Updates — Plain List

Posts that have been updated are listed here, with the latest at the top.



Way of the World – How the Left Is Killing the Family — TRANSCRIPT

Version 3: Nov 5, 2019 — Re-uploaded images and pdf for katana17.com/wp/ version.






VertigoPolitix – The Tactics of Immigration, Jul 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Version 3Nov 4, 2019 — Re-uploaded images for katana17.com/wp/ version.





Jordan Peterson Debates Cathy Newman on the Gender Pay Gap — TRANSCRIPT

Version 9Re-uploaded images and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version..






Continue reading

Posted in Admin | 15 Comments

All Posts — Plain List

Continue reading

Posted in Admin | 6 Comments

Patriotic Weekly Review – with Blair Cottrell – Dec 4, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT


[Mark Collett, No White Guilt, and Patrick Slattery, have a two hour discussion with the Aussie patriot  Blair Cottrell on his activist activities in the land Down Under against the ruling Orgjew system that is busy destroying the country through mass non-White invasion, among other methods.





Patriotic Weekly Review


Blair Cottrell


Dec 4, 2019



Click here for the video:



Published on Dec 4, 2019


BitChute Description


First published at 21:48 UTC on December 4th, 2019.

Mark Collett


8664 subscribers

Episode 31 of Patriotic Weekly Review with special guest Blair Cottrell as well as regular contributors No White Guilt and Dr Patrick Slattery.

Patriotic Weekly Review is a news and entertainment talk show. Opinions, thoughts, and views of guests/hosts do not necessarily represent the opinions, thoughts, and views of all hosts, and their appearance on this channel does not constitute sympathy, agreement, or endorsement of said opinions, thoughts, and views.

You can now donate to me via Bitcoin:



Blair Cottrell
Telegram: https://t.me/realblaircottrell

No White Guilt
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkY8CvV8WQFe87CZGmvuYHA
Website: http://nowhiteguilt.org/

Dr Patrick Slattery
BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/patrickslattery/
Website: http://nationalbugle.com





Mark Collett: Hello everybody and welcome to Patriotic Weekly Review episode number 31! And we have a really packed show for you tonight as always.


Our special guest is the incredible Blair Cottrell who we will be interviewing and introducing very soon.


We only have a couple of short announcements. Last night Laura was fantastic over on TR talk. She did an amazing job over there. And I am on that our talk tomorrow talking to Chris and putting over the ethno-nationalists point of view. So please support me there I’ll be tweeting about that tomorrow. I will be talking at a later date about the Patriotic Alternative Christmas parties they’re now in full swing. One of them has already taken place in London it was a great success and there’s more of them coming. I will keep you updated on them.


And we will be doing to general election streams both next week. One on Monday with myself Morgoth, Xerius, and Laura, discussing the general election in its entirety. Who you should vote for. A bit of a lowdown on the candidates and then we’ll be doing a follow-up stream to that on the Friday where we discuss how it turned out and what the implications of the result are for the country as a whole. So there’ll be two general election streams next week.


So, that is it for announcements. Now straight over to Jason what have you been up to this week my friend?


No White Guilt: Well Mark I must say we had an enormous event last night. There, the big awards for the video “Last Message to the West”. And you all can get over there and still watch it at Last Message to the West dot com. And I won’t reveal the top five winners.


A significant sum of money was distributed to all of the winners of these videos. It was very exciting with what’s most exciting about it is that this was a great victory for the community in service to White well-being! Because so many folks came together. This was Lovely Porridge’s original idea. It started with him and he immediately roped in the great Jared George. They worked together and before you knew it people were coming in from continent after continent in service to White well-being! And they contributed their time, their talents, some of them their money.


Obviously we ended up, of course, Roy Danson ending the contributions to the prizewinners with a last-minute $500 investment to the prize winners did it was just absolutely magnificent I think we ended up with 29 videos. All of them beautifully done and can reach people that in ways that only they can be reached.


So if you head on over to that website you’ll be able to so find those videos. And then you’ll be able to use them for yourself for your friends their family and a big salute to everyone who participated in that. We had a lot of fun last night distributing those awards and talking about the runners-up and all of that sort of thing.


But today it is magnificent to be with Blair! So much has come to me about this gentleman here and the good work that he is doing. He’s been recommended a great many times. Heard his name over and over, so I’m delighted to be here with him and, of course, our leader the great Mark Collett, and Dr. Patrick Slattery the all-knowing encyclopedia of the White positive sphere! And everyone out there in the chat today I’m already seeing some great names and beautiful ladies. So I will pass it back to Mark


Mark Collett: Thank you. Now Patrick what have you’ve been up to this week my friend?


Patrick: Well obviously I got the week started off right with a interview with Mark Collett on the National Bugle Radio. That’s always a great way to start the week. And I do my National Bugle Radio show. Last week we had a an interview with Kevin MacDonald. I haven’t gotten it on BitChute yet but hopefully by the end of the broadcast maybe I’ll have it up on BitChute. Is so that’s all been that’s all been good.


And I’m very, you know, I’m a big Aussiephile, actually! Steve Irwin and the Wiggles and all these people. These are my heroes! And I actually I had a bunch of Australian friends and I played footie for a while. I played footy and it’s an insane game! Only could be invented by people who spend most of their time upside down, because, you know, north-south business! But no it is so much fun it’s just a little bit insane for somebody my age to be running around.


But one thing that I did learn is for somebody my age to run fast, it really helps to have a bunch of big burly [05:01] Australian guys chasing you around! So that’s the good part. I don’t do it anymore. But yeah it kept me fast for a while. And so I’ll pass it on back to Mark


Mark Collett: Okay. Well one last piece of news before we go over to Blair. If you want to contribute to the show please do so using entropy. The link for the entropy chat is now in the main chat. It is also in the description of the show. It’s on my Twitter and he’s on my telegram. Entropy is the only way you can make financial contributions to the show and it is the only way you can ask questions to the panel. All questions are voted on the best questions are voted up and the questions at the top of the pile will be asked to the panel.


Please keep all questions today, it’s all going to be about Blair. This is about nothing else! It is about Blair. So if you’re asking questions please make them relevant to him, or relevant to Australian politics, or to things that he campaigns about, so we keep everything on topic.


Now I am gonna introduce the man himself. Now when I was younger, when I was of school age Australia was known for three, or four things. It was known for the soap opera Neighbours. It was known for Foster’s lager. It was known for kangaroos. And it was known from Kylie Minogue, who came out of the soap opera Neighbours. But now it is known for something much much better! Even better than Kylie Minogue, or kangaroos! And that is, of course, the ultimate Australian chad, Blair Cottrell!


Now when I first saw Blair Cottrell on the political scene, he was talking a lot about um issues to do with Islam, issues to do with migration. And he has gone on to be one of the most woke people on our side of the political fence. He now talks about everything we talked about! And he’s undergone an incredible political journey. And that is something that I really want to talk about tonight. Because so many people are scared to follow the trail of breadcrumbs to the ultimate truth.


But that isn’t Blair at all! He has embraced the ultimate truth! He talks about so many different things and, because of the things he talks about he is now the most censored man in Australian history! So, without further ado, please introduce yourself, please tell us where we can find your work, and please tell us how we can contribute to the great work that you do.


Blair: Okay. Well thanks for having me first of all. Yeah it is early in the morning here. Someone in the comments just said, it’s not 3 a.m. I got up at about 4:30 in the morning. It’s probably won’t look as impressive as you guys.


But yeah, well basically in 2015 is when I first engaged in the political realm, after having been I suppose you could say self-educated. Leading up to that I joined in with a street movement organization, a grassroots political protest group called “Reclaim Australia”. And then we started the “United Patriots Front” out of that, because Reclaim Australia didn’t turn out to be all that consistent. But we grew into the most popular grassroots working-class activist group in the country very quickly.


Within about a year we had over 200,000 followers on Facebook, and my videos would get enormous amount of reach. We got more attention than I was prepared for actually. I didn’t know what to do with it at first. I didn’t have a long term plan for this kind of movement. But I did what I could with it.


And I used the platform to communicate not just what the media will tell you I communicated, which is anti-Islam, but my message was very critical of what I saw as an institutional corruption at a State level. Specifically in media, government, education system, law enforcement, and even military. It was a moral corruption, which I believed was destroying our country from the inside. And I think everyone, everybody’s pretty familiar, everybody who would watch Mark is pretty familiar with that kind of stuff.


It’s Psych-warfare, an aspect of Psych-warfare. Because I went further than the “no Islam” kind of rhetoric I am currently the most censored person in the country, by far! I’ve had my Facebook account, Twitter, YouTube, PayPal, and even my personal bank account closed! And I haven’t been given reasons for any of your censorship, but yeah, you know, whst the reason is. It’s because, you know, if you’re going up against communists, or Marxists, their whole world philosophy is based on such a intricate network of lies and they can’t have anybody telling [10:02] the truth.


So, that’s where I’m at now, which is just on Gab and Telegram. I haven’t made BitChute yet, but I’ve been busy in and out of court over the past two and a half years, after I was charged by the state government for intent to incite ridicule of Muslims on Facebook. I was a initially convicted of that charge at a lower level of court, but I didn’t really spend money on lawyers at a lower level, because I thought it would be a waste. I knew it was probably to go to a higher level, and that’s what I wanted.


It eventually went to County Court, which is like mid-range in this country. That’s when I got a lawyer and that’s when the state government pulled out all the stops. And that’s when the media stopped reporting on it, at the same time. The Attorney General of Victoria, the state’s highest ranking law expert was summoned and four other state prosecuting lawyers were up against me and my barrister, John Bolton.


And that trial just took place about three weeks ago actually. Even though mainstream media journalist chose to report that I failed the whole thing about a year ago, a year before it even began! It just finished three weeks ago. And we’re still waiting to hear the results.


We’ve made three major arguments, and they’re all centred around, first of all my innocence on the “intent” charge, because as I said I’ve been charged with “intent to incite ridicule of Muslims”. I’m not actually inciting anything, so it’s a thought crime. They’ve gone into my head and said:


Your intent is criminal!


And also we’ve argued that’s based on Australia’s Constitution I have an implied right to political expression, or political discourse, political religious discourse. And under the UN, funnily enough, the UN Charter of Human Rights, I have the right to free expression. So we based our argument on those pieces of legislation, or those laws. And we should be getting a result any day now, so it’ll be interesting to see what happens there. That’s pretty much it!


Mark Collett: So at one time you were running the United Patriots Front, and we were talking about that before the show began. And that was something that was getting pretty big. That was something that was getting quite a lot of traction. It was something a lot of young men wanted to be involved in. And they’ve effectively attempted to shut that down by censoring you, heavily! Especially on Facebook.


And you were telling me before the show, I really want my viewers to hear this direct from you. Tell the story about that. And tell, because you’re telling me that now anyone that posts anything to do with you is its basically banned immediately from Facebook. So it’s almost like a single picture of you, the system recognizes it and the person posting it is basically banned, or is given some kind of infraction for doing that!


Blair: Yeah, it was one of the biggest things on Facebook at the time, my political platform that I created for us. I think the only person I can think of who grew faster there at the time was Milo Yinnapolis, but we kept that with him. Like our growth happened just before or around the same time as he was on Facebook. And uh, I think I was one of the first Facebook pages at the time to get hit with this worldwide censorship phenomena in 2016, in early 2016, actually. It was reported on by the media at the time, because back then we still got at least, you know, at least contacted by mainstream media for the purposes of slandering us.


And so they were always happy to see some something bad happening to us. So they reported on it and gloated about it. These days they don’t report on anything at all. It’s not allowed, they don’t mentions us, or my name at all! But yeah, it’s been pretty intense. And since Facebook seems to consider me a “dangerous individual” now, if you post a photo of me and that photo is reported, but they might even have facial recognition technology, I’m not sure how it works. But several people over the past couple of weeks have sent me screenshots of their accounts being banned for posting a photo of me. And Facebook explains that the photo violates their standards, their community standards on “dangerous individuals”. So I don’t know who decided that I was a “dangerous individual”, or whether it’s, you know, whether it comes from state government.


And there is every indication that this censorship that I’m on the receiving end of, it originates from State government and security agencies. I had a colleague in Victoria police, who confirmed this about three years ago. Who said that the original United Patriots Front Facebook page was closed down after pressure from the Australian Federal Police, Australian Security Intelligence Organization [ASIO]. They said that we were a threat to national security to Facebook, and when they hear that they just comply. But now it’s pretty intense.


Like when my Instagram account was closed, which they used to just post photos of myself myself at work or at the gym, that’s when I realized that it’s a pretty intense. They can’t even, they can’t allow me to have any opportunity to normalize myself. By mainstream media and State governments standards, I am a evil “neo-Nazi”, and anything I do that I prove that’s not true is not allowed. Including regular photos of me at the pub with friends, or just working out at the gym. Because that sort of blows holes in their are in their propaganda narrative.


But yeah, it’s impossible for me to get on Facebook now. If I make a Facebook account I don’t know whether they flagged my SIM card, IP address, I don’t know what it is. Like I’ve tried different tricks. But in my opinion if they’re going to ban you based on who you are, there’s really no point in trying make an account and hide from them. You’re better off just getting off that platform altogether [16:05].


Actually I think everyone should just get off Facebook! I don’t know why anyone still on it. It’s just a big information gathering program! I mean, everything you post on there, every bit of personal information, every opinion if it’s political, goes down in a police file! It is sitting in the database of some intelligence building in your country. I mean, you’re really just feeding them information that you don’t need to be feeding them. So I would recommend that no one uses Facebook at all


Mark Collett: Well, that’s a big thing! I mean, here tonight we have the most censored man in the history of Australia! So if you haven’t liked and shared the stream please like and share the stream now! Get as many people here as you can. This guy’s story needs to be heard!


And he is on Telegram. That’s actually how I got put in touch with Blair, through Telegram. Now he does have a Telegram page. It is linked in the description of the show. I will be sharing that on my telegram and on my Twitter after the show. So please if you are on telegram go and follow Blair. Make sure you are getting updates from him, because one of the ways obviously we know the way that social media tries to defeat us, you know, it is the new “town square” and they are kicking us off! They’re silencing us! And the fact that there might be facial recognition software that instantly flags people’s photos, and also a really good point here, I want to talk a bit about this, because you seem to have a lot harsher, or more repressive laws in Australia. Because we get taken down from things, but you’re saying here that you had a personal account where you just, you know, posted gym photos, or photos of, you know, yourself out on a walk with your girlfriend, or whatever. Then that went as well.


Now the other week I had a PayPal account. And I had a PayPal account, because I like playing old computer games. I collect retro Nintendo games and I’ve got quite a big collection and I trade them on eBay.


So sometimes they sell stuff that I don’t need anymore, you know, forget it if there’s a deal come upon something that I’ve already gotten it’s better condition I’ll buy a nice condition box game put it on the shelf from the one that’s a bit tatty I’ll sell on eBay. It’s not a major money earner, or anything. It’s just my hobby. I’m not really going out drinking kind of guy, so I like doing stuff around the house. I like tending to my collection, playing a few games. And I thought, you know, having a PayPal, I’ve never made it public, I’ve never made, I’ve never advertised my PayPal. I wasn’t really using it for political purposes, you know, people who wanted to buy my book could write to me and send me a PayPal transaction to buy a book. But it was never publicly advertised, or used really for political donations, or anything like that.


Yet the other day I got out, completely out of the blue, I went to buy something off eBay and it said your PayPal is no longer working. So I went to log in, just to see if it was sort of like every few years it asks you to re-verify, or double check your bank account. But I got a letter telling me that I was a somebody that PayPal wouldn’t do business with, because I was doing business that they thought was objectionable! I don’t know how selling older NES games on eBay is objectionable? But it’s obviously, because of who I am. And similar things have happened to you guys over there.


And I’ve also heard in Australia that they can actually take your bank account away from you, just, because of who you are!


Blair: Yeah. And I don’t think it’s got anything to do with our laws. All of this activity might actually be contrary to the law. It’s to be argued. The State and the various bureaucrats connected to it can do whatever they want until someone creates a legal precedent and takes them to court. But that costs money! And sometimes with some average working-class people, such as myself, in order to get the money to take people to court, or to go to court to answer to some crime, usually we need to raise funds from supporters, from the public.


And I think that’s largely the reason that’s my PayPal account and my bank account was shut down. Because I wasn’t given any specific reason. They just said basically uh well the bank said it was for “commercial imperatives” and PayPal said “your account violates our community policy”, or something like that. Which isn’t an answer. It’s just an obscure, you know, excuse.


But yeah, it’s not, I don’t know what the law says in Australia, I’m not a lawyer. But I know that everything is arguable in Australia. Things can go on for quite a while in the courts in this country.


Our legal system is based off the same model as England. I’ve actually heard that we ended up making a fairer legal system than what England has, because we wanted to follow the example set by the United States and be a little bit cooler than England, you know, or a little bit “freer”, as they say.


But there’s nothing you can do about it. Like until you actually set a precedent by taking these people to court, take representatives from a bank to court, take a journalist from mainstream media, editors, whatever. Until you sue these people, you put in the time and effort necessary to do that, then they’re just going to keep doing it. I mean, why wouldn’t they?




They’re in a position where they can literally just delete the people they don’t like and get away with it! If you were a communist, and you were in a position of power, I’ll probably do the same thing! And so you’re gonna understand it from their perspective. These are tyrants! Their whole philosophy of life, and the propaganda program that they’re are disseminating, propagating, to people is all lies! So when someone is challenging them, they need to shut that person up. Because when your programs based on lies, you can’t reason with people, you can’t have logical discussions, you have to just scream at them! And if they don’t shut up you have to shut them up! You have to fine them, you have to censor them! It’s the only way that you can protect your regime.


No White Guilt: Well, if I could jump in, really quickly, before Patrick gets onto that mute button, as I know he’s gotten a hair trigger and the ability to get there.


But no, this is something I just quickly have a question for you Blair about the, any trends you may have seen in the censorship, the censorial activity that you have undergone. And so just kind of to prep you, get you thinking about that, while I make the point here that. It doesn’t, this is something we’ve talked about before ladies and gentlemen, it comes down to anti-Whiteism informing decisions that are being made when it comes to laws, policies, rules, etc.


So Blair, what Blair’s pointing out here is that there are not laws in place to enable these people to do these things. Anti-Whiteism is informing their ideas to either apply laws, or not apply laws. And he’s talking about getting a barrister, or lawyer, whatever it’s called in Australia, to go to court to sue these people, or to try to bring them up on some sort of charges. To appeal to the local law enforcement.


Again you’re going to see situations here where the anti-Whiteism is going to be applied to the rules, laws, policies, etc. That’s why in the United States, for example, we lose all the time! It doesn’t matter how right we are by the letter of the law, we end up losing! So it’s the reason why in the United States, why they will dilate the law, and we see elsewhere we saw on the UK, of course, many times this past year, dilate the law to punish those who are heretics to anti-Whiteism.


And at the same time they will shrink the law, they will absolutely desiccate and erase the law, policies, rules, whatever it might be in order to allow those who are anti-White to give them carte blanche to do whatever they want in the world!


This is also something else, by the way, just as a parallel thought. That it speaks to the danger of libertarian ideology. That governments are not the main source of oppression for White people today, it’s private industry that is the main source for oppression of White people today.


So this libertarian lust for an idealization of all things private property, etc., is something that if it were instantiated, if government were somehow eradicated, we would end up with a similar scenario! Perhaps get there even faster, and that is to White erasure! Because you would have these private entities that would be pursuing these anti-White objectives, as we see on places like Facebook. Look at all of these places that Blair has been censored from again, and again, and again! Look at me. Blair’s taking a little bit of a different track than I have, where I have said:


Everywhere the anti-White censor me, I’ll get on to more platforms!


I’ve kept that promise. I’ve gotten back on to many of these platforms. I can’t tell you the number of times I’ve been censored off of PayPal as a consequence. But these are not government entities! In fact, it’s a government entity that allows Jared Taylor to have his conferences down in Tennessee. [25:00] So private entities, such as hotels and the like, have been undermining us for two decades!


So what I want to ask here of Blair, I’ve actually got quite a few questions for you brother, and what you’ve had to deal with. I’ll ask two of them right now to you, because they kind of go together.


One, is this. What kind of, have you noticed any trends when it comes to censoring you?


Have you noticed that you get on a platform and you’d have to do very little on the platform and then you’re censored, or do you have to begin to engage others and then they find and identify you, or is it a number of pictures, or videos, or something like that that they finally find and then censor you?


When you are on a payment processor, do you have to begin taking in donations before you’re censored?


Is it a certain amount of days, or certain certain number of donations?


And along with that if you could answer this question. How do you — and this is something that we pride ourselves on here with Mark and Patrick and all the work that we do in service of White wellbeing, is that we always have a robust response a healthy response when they censor us, it doesn’t get us down. So how do you, how does it land on you emotionally, when they censor you?


You obviously seem to be more emboldened even though they censor again, and again css so if you could talk to that, because a lot of folks out there listening right now live and who will be listening soon are going to be looking at Blair, and they’re gonna be saying:


How does this land on Blair? How should it land on me if I’m censored? How should I feel about our people being censored?


So both of those questions please, sir.


Blair: First of all, it really depends I think on the staff member in question on Facebook who happens upon me at the time. It really the censorship really depends on the whim of whoever it is that’s reviewing any report, whatever staff member is reviewing the report. Facebook staff I think.


Because sometimes I’m banned straight away before I even post anything.


Like really within an hour of making a new account. And then other times I can survive for three months and get another ten, or twenty thousand followers, and then they’ll find some obscure reason to ban me. I’ve never been banned for a good reason, I don’t think. I’ve never I think being deliberately over the top, or two antagonistic, or engaged in arguing with someone where I’ve vilified them. I just don’t do that as a general rule.


I think it’s a bit of a distraction from the purpose for using the platform in the first place.


And how does it affect me emotionally?


It doesn’t really. Like I was never, I think I was compelled to get involved in politics obviously, because I love my country and my heritage, but it’s also for psychological reasons.


Since I was young I’ve always been a bit of a troublemaker, you know! When I see “Authority”, or someone purporting to be in a position of authority over me, my immediate responses always:


Oh! You’re in charge of me are you? Well show me why!


So I’m a bit, someone who rocks the boat just instinctively.


And so that in conjunction with what I saw happening to my country was the main motivating factor for me.


Emotionally? I can’t answer that, because I don’t really, I don’t feel that I have been emotionally affected.


If anything, I was relieved! I never wanted to be a leader of some movement. It just happened! Then everyone was looking to me suddenly, because I was the only one the delivering any sort of effective message to people at the time. And I fell into this position in the same way.


I felt a little bit like Katniss Everdeen in The Hunger Games, I was just a reluctant leader for a while. And when I was censored it was almost a bit of a relief for me! I was like:


Well, I don’t have to do that anymore! That’s actually pretty cool.


But then you feel obliged, because so many people are counting on you, so many people believed in you, and you inspired and woke a lot of people up. That’s what I did through my political activity.


And so I’ve felt called back into it again to participate again. And I believe that I’ll be building something pretty big at the start of next year, now that I’m free of court, and all the legal charges.


I’m basically free to dedicate my time so it’s of rebuilding the movement that I created three years ago.


Patrick: Well, I’ll jump in for a second. First of all, you know, it was interesting you said that Facebook says that they removed your account, because of community standards. And “community standards”! I guess we’re so used to hearing that, but it’s actually very Orwellian! Because they’re not community standards!


I’m sure that the community that you live in, that your values are, you know, your traditional values. So what really do they mean by community standards? And indeed, what do they mean by community? I mean, Jason knows that in America you’ve got a black community, and you’ve got a Hispanic community, and an Asian community.


But I don’t think I’ve ever heard anybody talk about a White community? We’re not allowed to have community. So community doesn’t mean what it used to mean. It just means a basically a group of non-Whites.


And I’m, yeah, I’m not trying to be incendiary about this, it’s just that’s what it means. Now I was in Australia, I’ve been there a couple of times, and I was there a few years ago. I remember walking around Sydney, Brisbane, and it’s like:


Daddy! Where are the White people?


They really weren’t! They weren’t! You know, you could walk around in big areas and you wouldn’t see very many White people. There’s a lot of Asians in some places, you go.A lot of Muslims.


And I went to Alice Springs. Alice Springs, I was going into one of the big stores there, where people shop, a supermarket, and there were security guards. And the security guards, or from South Sudan! Are they doing the jobs that Australians aren’t capable of doing? You know, why do there have to be a bunch of South Sudanese in Alice Springs working as security guards!


So it’s just all very bizarre! And somehow “community standards” prevent you from questioning it? It’s just all so bizarre.


And, you know, of course, also Jason brought up the issue of, well, are we being censored by the government, or being censored by business? And, you know, at some point like we know in the old fashioned Soviet style systems you had government controlled business. In our system maybe you have business controlled government. Instead of a government-run media maybe you’ve got a media run government, to an extent. You have an establishment and the establishment is rooted in both business and in the private sector. And sometimes it’s hard to see where one begins and one ends. They’re certainly both hostile to us.


We’ve got in the United States, you’ve got this ongoing coup d’etat.


So anyway, I guess to use this opportunity for a question.


My question is, in Australia really to what extent have people drunk the kool-aid?


To what extent are your views really shared by many people even if they’re afraid to say it out loud?


What do you think? To what extent are your views more mainstream than one would think?




Blair: Well, first of all I wouldn’t flatter the Marxists of the United States with the term “coup d’etat”. I wouldn’t describe what they’re doing as a coup d’etat.


From this White warfare, it gives the opportunity to people who are afraid of fighting, to use any and other means other than fighting, to worm their way into positions of authority. As a result in authority you end up with nothing but cowards and liars.


Also “community standards”, well what our community standards? Well if you’re a White person, you’re basically, your existence goes against multicultural community standards. And this is something a lot of people don’t understand about Australia. And I think a lot of Australians don’t understand it about their own country, too.


Multiculturalism” and the slogan “diversity is our greatest strength”, these aren’t just slogans, they are the law!


Since 1994 in Australia, through the “Racial and Religious Tolerance Act” multiculturalism, Australia being a multicultural and diverse society, has been in legislation, that’s been enacted since then. And specifically in that legislation it states that the purpose of the legislation is not so much “legal” but “social” and for “educational” purposes. And it goes on to give examples and steps of how, what sort of steps need to be taken in order to further educate the community in the direction of multiculturalism and diversity.


So the purpose of this law, since the beginning, since it was passed, and I don’t know whether the Parliamentarians who passed this law were on the payroll of some (((hidden hands))), or some special interest group, or whether they just pretended that it was a nice thing. They took it at face value and said:


Oh yeah, this sounds nice! Let’s pass it!


But the examples about how this law is to be enacted, is through education.


And what is education? It’s not just school.


I mean, television programs, even radio shows, are form of adult education. They’re a form of education that takes place on a daily basis. Propagation system for the average person.


But, yet the average person in Australia does not like multiculturalism! The average White working-class Australian. They’re actually sick of hearing the word! Which is why the word “multiculturalism” is not used anymore.




Now we hear “diversity”. And for a while we were hearing “refugees”. That was the big thing, “refugees welcome”. But that only lasted a few years, because mostly thanks to social media and Facebook, there was a extreme backlash from the working Australian public about the refugee policies that were basically being forced onto the country by political bureaucrats and members of the media class.


So now it’s all about “diversity”.


Actually, it’s not really about anything anymore. They don’t really talk about multiculturalism, or the mass migration system anymore. Now if anyone who is talking about it basically gets censored, or fired from their position from mainstream media. It’s a non-issue now! It’s treated like it’s a non-issue! Although Australia, in terms of infrastructure and space, is literally a bursting point as a result of mass immigration.


But the point is that in Australia multiculturalism is not just the political slogan, it’s the law! And it has been since 1944 [1994]. Think of it as a “speed limit”, right. I’ve said this once before. You can drive down a street, it might be 60 km/h speed limit. You can disagree with it all you want. You could say:


I don’t agree with this speed.


But if you don’t do it, you’re breaking the laws.


So if you don’t, if you take steps to prevent multiculturalism from happening in some way, even by speech, you could essentially be breaking the law in Australia. And that’s the situation that Australian workers are currently in. And most of you don’t even know it.


So, as I said before, all of the censorship against me and people like me in my country, it might, I didn’t say that it wasn’t legal, I said might not necessarily be legal. But based on the Racial and Religious Tolerance Act, which legislates multiculturalism into the law, it may technically be illegal to publicly criticize it! Because that may, that may, in the minds of everyday people, be discouraging them from believing in the beautiful, noble society of diverse equality!


But as I said, the average Australian person is against these policies.


They don’t like it! They see the transformation taking place in Australia and they are against it! Average working people on job sites, every day are talking about it. They recognize it as a destructive thing! They don’t necessarily see it as a deliberate destructive effort.


Many people believe that it is just a “mistake” on the part of the government. That they mistakenly took on this multicultural policy, because they thought it was going to be a really beautiful experiment, and it’s just gone horribly wrong! You know, so it’s just a mistake.


The possibility that it’s being done to their country deliberately, for a destructive purpose, is often a little bit too much for regular people. They get a little bit afraid. They refuse to believe that they’re being lied to on that scale.


But the point is, most Australian people, most working Australian people don’t like it! They don’t like it! They don’t like the political class! They don’t like the media class! And they will voice quite often their disgust in members of government and media elites, on job sites. [Blair works as a carpenter].




Mark Collett: Well, there’s something I really want to ask you. And it was something that Patrick said that sort of triggered me in wanting to ask this question. Patrick said that when he went to Australia he saw a huge number of non-Whites.


And I know that White people are indigenous to Australia, but White people did make Australia what it is today. Australia wouldn’t be the First World country it is, without European settlers.


Now, it’s a really interesting thing, because when Patrick said that, many people in the UK would be really puzzled by this, because here in the UK there’s this sort of conservative mantra that Australia has the best immigration system in the whole world! And we keep hearing from like the Daily Mail and the Conservative Party here in the UK:


Oh, we don’t need limits on immigration, we’re gonna have an Australian style points based system! Where every immigrant is vetted! And every immigrant is a apportion these points. I need so many points to go in.


But from what Patrick’s saying, it doesn’t sound like the points-based system is actually doing anything for Australians. In fact, it sounds as if Australians are facing exactly the same problems of replacement and displacement as Europeans are here in Europe, and in North America.


Can you comment about on this?


As I said, because lots of our viewers will have heard this from the Conservative Party. It’s actually an election pledge at the moment. Boris Johnson, who’s the leader of the Conservative Party, that he’s gonna bring in, he’s finally gonna sort out the immigration problem with an Australian points-based system! Is that simply just more hot air and rubbish? [40:53]


Blair: First of all there wouldn’t be Australia as a nation, or a nation state, without European colonials. Before the arrival of the first British fleet, Australia was known by sailors as “Terra Nullius” which I think means “unknown southern land” in Latin, [land without an owner] or “Terra Nullius Australia”, or something like that.


But that’s why I find it amusing that true indigenous people to Australia, the aboriginals consider themselves the “first Australians”. Mostly, because they hadn’t actually named the country that they lives on. They’d only named things on it. They hadn’t mapped it. What they didn’t even have any understanding of where they lived as being an island.


But the second part of your question, I’m sorry was what? It’s early in the morning.


Mark Collett: Yes, I’m sorry, for people who don’t appreciate this but Blair have to get up at 5:30 a.m. To come on, so it is very early for him.


I was saying that in the UK the Australian points based immigration system is kind of like trumpeted as the greatest immigration system the world’s ever known! And currently Boris Johnson’s going around telling everyone that:


Anyone who’s got concerns over immigration, we don’t even need limits on immigration, because once we have this Australian points-based system, everything is going to be sorted!


But obviously from what Patrick’s saying, you’re facing exactly the same problems as we are. And I just want somebody from Australia to explain, to sort of our wider audience, how the points-based system is just as rubbish as sort of every other system.


Blair: The points-based system for who doesn’t know, in Australia is a system through which any new arrival into the country earns a certain point of status, and must remain above a certain point threshold. I think it’s 65, or 70, in order to legally stay in Australia.


The way you earn points as a newly arrived immigrant is through maintaining a job, paying your tax, obeying the law, etc.


However what a lot of people don’t realize is the point system is only put in place for “legal skilled immigrants”. It’s not put in place for refugees, or people that come into the country claiming to be seeking refuge from some poverty, or war-stricken circumstance. Whether, or not it’s true is another thing.


Australia takes something of a strong stand point on immigration. When newly arrived immigrants who can’t prove who they are, can’t prove their work history, try to come into Australia, they’re sent off-shore to a detention centre. This is something that the “noble humanitarian” leftists are always disgusted by in Australia. They want to do everything they can to get these unknown people into the country as fast as possible! Because that basically proves what “nice” people they are, at least to one another.


But I can’t comment too much more on the point system. I only know that it’s only truly enforced, probably on Europeans, and maybe Indian immigrants, as well. There are a lot of Indian immigrants coming into Australia, because there’s so much new development.


There’s tens of thousands, I would say even hundreds of thousands of cheap new homes being built inland, in former swampland in Australia. So close to each other, they’re virtually touching. And you have to ask yourself if Australian birth rates are so low, why would developers be buying up all this land and building hundreds of thousands of new homes?


Who’s going to buy those new homes? Australians aren’t having children. The answer is simple! Moderately wealthy immigrants are encouraged, through various ambassadors that work for the developers, to come into the country and buy these homes. Get in and invest, and basically it’s like little Indian inland, from where I live.


And in various areas like that where all the new developments are taking place, it’s just a huge — for lack of a better term — clusterfuck of Indians and Pakistanis, mostly!


I’d say the Africans, they fall into a different category. Most of the South Sudanese immigrants are here on refugee status, or they are the children of immigrants that came here on refugee status. [45:23]


Mark Collett: Does Jason, or Patrick have any follow-up questions this? Jason you are unmuted


No White Guilt: I am unmuted, usually I’m unmuted, just in case, just in case! But yeah, I definitely do.


The immigration issue. We were talking a moment ago, I could tie it back to the conversation, or the topic that we were saying a moment ago. Which is this, the White people you said, our people in Australia, of course, the only real Australians are White people, because you have to have the biosphere to create Australia inside of you to be able to have an Australia, or sustain an Australia. So the real Australians there, the White people in Australia.


You were talking about how they think it’s some sort of accident that things are getting worse. So you have these border crossers coming in, doctors, lawyers, judges, and they are engineers, [being sarcastic] coming into Australia. And clearly neighborhoods are going to be changing.


Now one of the things that we think is very important is not just the fact when the neighborhood becomes more criminal, but also when the non-White peoples attain what we refer to as “numerical courage” and they begin projecting their biosphere, their different “world view”, their different likes and dislikes, norms, onto their environments around them, which makes it an environment very different from the environment that you all create and are used to seeing.


So am I right in hearing that many, or most, or a good percentage of Australians are of the perception that multiracialism is damaging the country, is damaging what they hold dear?


And yet you’re saying here — and this is the, I think important point for all of us to think about — is that they’re still projecting who and what they are onto those who are making this happen. And that’s why they think it’s an accident, because they themselves would never change an area for an entire people, would never change an entire country for an entire people.


And if this is the case, then if the perception is that multiracialism is that is the human soil, the human capital there of our people, is it becoming increasingly rich, increasingly ripe, for messages like you have to bring to them, about our well-being, visa vie, multiracialism and bringing in hordes and hordes of doctors, lawyers, judges, and astronauts? [47:43]


Blair: Yeah. Like I said, for regular people, the possibility that there is actually an ethnic genocide campaign taking place in their country, and they are scheduled for extermination and replacement by a cheaper, easier to lie to, easier to manage, workforce of smaller capacity for thought, it’s just too much for them! They can’t process that possibility! Instead, they prefer to repeat the slogan that “multiculturalism has failed”. But I always say to them:


It hasn’t failed! It’s doing exactly what it was supposed to do! I mean, what do you think it was supposed to do? You think all of these big, rich, corporate bureaucrats, and politicians, and mass media moguls, truly wanted to create a multicultural society of harmony? Like do you think that’s what these rich, and powerful, people had in mind when they legislated that policy in your country? Of course, not! You are scheduled for replacement! Ethnic replacement!


Why? Because you demand too much freedom, too many rights, you think too much.


Just look at examples of communism all around the world, in Eastern Europe and Russia. Whatever communism is imposed by White people, they don’t tolerate it. They eventually rise up against it and it collapses within one, or two generations.


The only people who seem to tolerate the Asians, like the Chinese can put up with it. And, you know, obviously India tolerated a tyrannical rule for a long time without doing anything about it.


And so, what a perfect system for a small network of corporate tyrants, or Marxists, we won’t call these people — we know who they are — to have! To have only two classes, themselves and then a mass mongrel, mixed, class of people too stupid, and too divided, to ever form any sort of resistance against them.”


And that’s what multiculturalism was about from the start! It wasn’t about “harmony” and “equality”! These are feel-good slogans! There’s a saying a Shakespearean saying:


Oh what a good exterior deception has!


Something like that.


It’s like that a beautiful apple that seems in great condition, it can still be rotten in the core.


And this is what they’ve done. They’ve created this never-ending repetitive network of slogans about how “humane” and how “good-natured”, how “good” their intent is. But really from the beginning, their intent has been power! Power, control, through genocide! It’s really that simple. And anybody who thinks that’s not possible, hasn’t been paying attention. And doesn’t understand history.


Like I said, for average minded people, it’s not really possible to process deceptions of that magnitude! Because regular people don’t lie like that. Regular people tell lies such as:


Hey boss, I’m sick! I can’t come to work today.


They tell small lies. They don’t plan the genocide of a whole people, because they want a more manageable workforce! That’s not an average person’s lie!


And so average people find it hard to process that’s happening. They find it hard to believe that that many people could be in on it. And that it’s been going on for that long. But the problem is, it is happening. That many people are in on it, consciously, or unconsciously. They’re being paid good money to be in on it. And it’s been happening to you for quite some time.




Patrick: Okay. So there’s a couple issues I want to address.


One is, you know, the issue of White people in Australia, and we had, if you turn the clock back a few centuries, there were some parts of the globe that had hunter-gatherers. Had Stone Age hunter gatherer societies, whatever, cultures. The only place where you still have, where one has been preserved, there’s a little island in the Andaman Sea and they’re left more, or less, unmolested. Nowhere else. Nowhere else. And it doesn’t matter, all the these Stone Age hunter gatherers societies were overrun, but typically by whoever was closest.


The pygmies and the Bushmen were overrun by bantus, by Africans, you know, black Africans. So it’s happened everywhere.


And the idea that the great continent of Australia would remain the domain of hunter-gatherers, there was no way that was going to happen!


And now it so happened that rather than being nearby Southeast Asians, or Chinese, who sooner, or later would have would have stumbled across Australia. Would have happened sooner, or later.


The Europeans, the British, got their first, Captain Cook. And they set up a society there. If they hadn’t done that in the late 1700s, probably by the early 1800s Chinese, or maybe Vietnamese, would have come across it. Probably the Chinese, because they were out in the Indian Ocean.


And if you look at the fate of minorities in China, Tibetans, or Wihgers, or Mongolians, or Manchurians, they’ve been completely overwhelmed demographically. And I’m not trying to whip up anti-Chinese sentiment, or anything, but the fact of the matter is they were completely overwhelmed. And we’re not talking about hunter-gatherer societies here, we’re talking about literate societies. And yet they were overwhelmed, completely marginalized.


And it’s not as if Europeans have always been benevolent rulers who took over Australia, at the end of the day, made much more provisions for a continuation of an Aboriginal race and an Aboriginal society then any other group would have, than the Chinese, or Indians, or Southeast Asians would have.


So I don’t think there’s any cause for guilt about a White country being set up in Australia.


And the Aborigines, I don’t mean to demean them in any way. And when I was in Dreamworld on the Gold Coast, near Brisbane, a few years back, I met, had a very nice conversation with an Aboriginal gentleman there who was who was sweeping the grounds with a broom. But he was also a musician. And he was somebody had travelled around.


And so it’s not to be demeaning, but the idea that you can expect the same from Aborigines as you could from, you know, either White people, or Asian people or, you know, other groups. You can’t expect them to live the same way. You can’t expect them to sit in a classroom for eight hours at a time and study and get degrees, because the genes that make that tolerable we’re not, were of absolutely no benefit to them prior to their contact with Europeans. And so they just don’t have that capacity. [55:26]


Blair: You can’t encourage qualities to the surface of people which were never given them in the first place. And that’s the point you’re making there.


Patrick: Yeah, and I’m not trying to be demeaning! I’m sure there’s a lot of things that they can do.


I mean, I know in I went outside Alice Springs, I can’t remember the place I went to, and some of the things that the men would do, they might track feral horses. And they might track the feral horses for a few days and get one, and be able to sell it. And a lot, I don’t know how many people could do that. But it’s a skill that’s actually not particularly valuable in a modern society, but, you know, it’s the type of thing that would have been valuable to them, at the time.


So, it’s not to be demeaning, but it’s just that they’re their differences. And, you know, at least the British who set up the modern Australian state in, at the end of the day, tried to make a lot of provisions for these people. And I doubt the Chinese would have done the same. And I’m not trying to be mean to the Chinese, either, but I doubt they would have done the same.


And I think Blair makes a really good point about communism. The American political scientist who was very influential in the mid 20th century after the World War Two. George Kennan is the father of the policy of “containment”.


A lot of people think of “containment” is, oh you don’t let the Soviet Union expand it’s influence so that ultimately we can defeat them! The whole idea, George Kennan’s concept of containment, was sooner, or later, the Russian people are too Russian to stay communist! The Russian people aren’t going to accept that system forever. And so let’s just wait it out. The Russian people will sort it out on their own. That was actually his concept.


And Blair seems to have, you know, the same understanding that that the European people, that type of system — which was very foreign — it wasn’t, you know, it’s a kind of a tribal ideology, and we know which tribe. It was imposed on them.


And the last thing I want to say, you know, we often talk about a more manageable work force, but really, at the end of the day, I think the replacement, the ethnic replacement, dispossession and replacement, it’s easier to talk about, you know, in business terms, they want a more manageable workforce. It’s a little bit more than just the workforce.


They want a more manageable population, a controllable population. And clearly a population where you have a potential of ethnic based nationalism that would have the strength to overthrow this small tribal elite that dominates our societies, that’s really what they want to prevent.


So not just manageable workforce, management population. So that’s not really a question, but it, you know, ….


Mark Collett: That’s definitely not a question!


But I have a question! I have a question!


I can follow that with a quick question, before we move on to the viewer questions, for the panel and for Blair.


Having you on, it’s been really great tonight. And we’ve talked about a range of different things. But when I first saw you when you first appeared on social networks, and I saw you on Facebook, when you were on Facebook. You sort of got involved through the sort of anti-Islam movement and that’s what you were known for.


But you’ve really gone on this incredible political journey! And now you’ve, you know, seen the bigger picture, you’re talking about the same issues as us. You’re talking about issues of White genocide, of people being bred out in the countries of their forefathers, or the countries their forefathers created.


And how has that affected you going on that political journey?


And have you found it’s made you more friends, or have you found that some people have dumped you, and now won’t work with you, because you now see and talk about the bigger picture?




Blair: It would be a mistake to think that I’ve developed this much more intricate, or a much deeper understanding as I progressed through politics. I knew everything I know five years ago.


I just was pragmatic about my political approach, even expedient you might say, you know, in choosing to alert the population about one small aspects of a greater problem in order to get their attention, so I could educate them more on the subject. The one small aspect that I chose to focus on in the beginning was Islamic immigration, because that’s what was getting people’s hearts beating.


But then I went on to explain a psychological warfare and the subversion that I saw was one of the root causes behind the threat to Australia and all West in the world, faces right now.


But really what I think is important to discuss is not so much the distant past, but the immediate past. And how this has happened to our countries. We understand how we’ve arrived, at this point, then we can understand what we have to do to get out of this situation. And also to prevent it from happening in the first place.


And I wanted to do a demonstration on that when I get back onto either Telegram or BitChute. And basically it’s the result of weakness in State security. Our own State security agencies that we set up in the beginning. And the inability to understand deceptive and manipulation. Deception and manipulation of words and terms. The concept of “freedom and democracy” basically made our Security, Intelligence organizations believe that people coming into this country with destructive and foreign concepts, ideologies, was also part of freedom.


Like I want to refer to Yuri Bezmenov and his demonstration — the former KGB agent for the Soviet Union — when he says that:


In order for a country to be targeted by psychological warfare and subversion it needs to be receptive. And the most receptive countries in the world to psych-warfare are democracies, because they’re obsessed with freedom.


And so when you have this idea of “total freedom” all the time, then your enemy sees an opportunity there to come into your country, fund whoever they want, buy whoever they want, and to start a slow process of transformation in your country for their own gains.


But yeah, it’s been good coming on. So I’m not sure what we go on so now. What the next part of the show is.


Mark Collett: It’s questions for you from the audience. We have Entropy, which is the free speech alternative to Super Chats. And that allows people to send us donations. It also allows people to ask questions. And the best questions are voted up. So we now have an hour of questions and answers from the audience. And I’ll start with the super chats. Gordon Miller gave us ten US dollars and said:


Great job lads!


Thank you very much. F22 Daniel gave three US dollars and said:


Blair how is the African youth crime in Melbourne? Getting better, or worse? And also what was the follow-up after the gay marriage referendum? And is the black population in Footscray increasing, or not?


So those three questions. Black youth crime in Melbourne. What was the follow-up after the gay marriage referendum. And what is the black population in Footscray like? [63:29]


Blair: The African youth crime crisis in Melbourne was something that was reported on sometimes, about a year ago, or just before a year ago, a year a half ago, because it was so rampant it was impossible for mainstream media journalists to ignore it. Especially after a man in the northern suburbs was murdered. A White Australian man was murdered by Africans wielding machetes on the street. Carjackings, jewelry store robberies, even MacDonald restaurants being exploited. It was so rampant that it was reported on.


For the last 12 months ever since I hosted a rally in San Kilda, that was very successful despite enormous censorship efforts on the part of Facebook, and the state government. And mainstream media journalists saying that I was essentially a domestic “terrorist” right before the rally, to try to discourage people to go. It was still very successful.


And the one of the main motivators, one of the main reasons I hosted that rally was to address the root cause of this crime crisis, which was our immigration policy, which was ultimately led back into government bureaucracy and media corruption.


But since that rally I haven’t heard a single report about the crime crisis! I haven’t seen anything in the media about any more carjackings, or robberies, or murders. There’s been out one thing I think in St. Kilda [a Mekbourne suburb]. But they don’t talk about the ethnicity of offenders anymore, and they don’t release photos or video footage, and say “If you’ve seen these people contact police” as if you can tell them anyway.


But so I think it’s interesting that there’s been a blanket ban on reporting on that crime crisis in Australia now. So even though you don’t hear about it anymore, it’s probably still getting progressively worse. I actually heard in some of the more wealthy suburbs, the young Africans are targetting people there, because they all have nicer cars and a lot of them just generally offer up a lot less resistance.


What was the second question?


Mark Collett: What was the follow-up from people after the gay marriage referendum?


Blair: Oh yeah. Well the gay marriage referendum in Australia, it was almost an enormous and very rushed brainwashing process by the government and media class.


Some Labour Party bureaucrat had a connection with Telstra, of some sort. And he used that connection to have Telstra send out texts that everybody telling them to vote YES on gay marriage. I myself got a text.


Every government office that you can see in any town, city, suburb, was covered in rainbow stickers telling people to vote YES! Radio programs were telling people to vote YES! The receipts, your docket, from the local supermarkets told you at the bottom to vote YES. It was everywhere! It was an enormous effort in terms of propaganda!


And what’s been the result? As far as I’m aware, nothing! It was not actually a referendum it was a “postal vote” and so it holds no legal power. It can be used in the courts as an argument for why it should be legalized. But, because it was not a compulsory vote, it doesn’t hold any actual power in Australia. It’s only it’s only an example, or an exemplary case.


As far as I’m aware nothing has happened. I could imagine that these government bureaucrats are drawing up some sort of legislation that they’re trying to get passed in the courts, but that’s that always takes some time.


I know that they’re being opposed by various Christian lobby groups, especially, because they’re trying to tell priests and pastors, Christian pastors, that they must marry gay people! And that if they refuse they can go to jail. And that’s really stirring the Christians up, as you can imagine. And the last question.


Mark Collett: That was about the black population in Footscray. Is it increasing, or not?


Blair: I don’t know about Footscray. I’m in the south eastern suburbs [of Melbourne] and I don’t go there very much, so I couldn’t comment on that. Couldn’t imagine it getting any smaller.


Mark Collett: No. Well thank you for answering that. The next question is from Serena JB. She sent five US dollars. Thank you very much. And she asked:


Is Australia suffering from the same group of (((people))) we dare not name, as we are suffering in the rest of the West.


Blair: Yes! And Julia Gillard, before failing to even finish her term as a prime minister, signed the global anti-semitism declaration, which pretty much makes it illegal to talk about that! So there’s your answer.


Mark Collett: Well thank you for that.















See Also








PDF Notes

* Total words = xx

* Total images = 2

* Total A4 pages = xx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)


Version History


Version 4:


Version 3:


Version 2:


Version 1: Dec 8, 2019 — Published post.

Posted in Antifa, Australia, Deception, Hate Speech, Jews - Hostile Elite, Marxism, Mind Control, Multiculturalism, Muslim, Muslim invasion, Propaganda, Race, Traitors - Journalists, Traitors - Politicians, Transcript, White genocide, White Nationalism | Leave a comment

Byram Campbell – The New Mythology of Racial Equality — Part 2

[A 1960s tour of the world by an American race realist and how, what he calls, “The New Mythology of Racial Equality” is a highly destructive ideology being foisted upon Whites.

In Part 2, Egypt, Ethiopia and India and their peoples are assessed and compared to Whites.





Byram Campbell


The New Mythology

of Racial Equality




Part 2 of 3




The New Mythology of Racial Equality.



38 Park Row.

New York 8, N. Y. 1963





[Part 1]

The New Mythology of Racial Equality.

The Spanish People

The Italian People


[Part 2]

The Egyptian People

The Monuments of India
India as a Civilization

[Part 3]







Other Works by the Same Author




The New Mythology of Racial Equality


BEFORE we start seeing the world we should gain some knowledge of the ideas that are throwing it into a ferment; otherwise, its lands emerge in half lights. For better orientation let us look backward to the early part of our century.


Lothrop Stoddard in the preface to his book The Rising Tide of Color (1920) came to the conclusion that since of her values depend on the quality of life Americans would wisely act to protect this value. Neither Stoddard, nor the many who agreed with him foresaw the psychotic forces that would arise dedicated to destroying the moral man’s values as well as our racial heritage. Because of the acceptance of the new beliefs the changes that have occurred are opposite to those forecast by Stoddard.


The ideas which we have mentioned have become Incorporated in a mystique. This we name The New Mythology.


Unless we can gain a knowledge of how this mystique has arisen we shall be handicapped in combating it. Even if given the facts most men do not accept them, for they are usually adequately prepared only to understand other, normal men. Fortunately we can call on a great philosopher for help.

Continue reading

Posted in Africa, Bk - The New Mythology, Communism, Ethiopia, Eygpt, India, Liberalism, Marxism, Multiculturalism, Muslim, Negros, Pakistan, Political Correctness, Race, Race Differences, Third World, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Byram Campbell – The New Mythology of Racial Equality — Part 1


[A 1960s tour of the world by an American race realist and how, what he calls, “The New Mythology of Racial Equality” is a highly destructive ideology being foisted upon Whites.





Byram Campbell


The New Mythology

of Racial Equality




Part 1 of 3




The New Mythology of Racial Equality.



38 Park Row.

New York 8, N. Y. 1963





[Part 1]

The New Mythology of Racial Equality.

The Spanish People

The Italian People


[Part 2]

The Egyptian People

The Monuments of India
India as a Civilization

[Part 3]







Other Works by the Same Author




The New Mythology of Racial Equality


BEFORE we start seeing the world we should gain some knowledge of the ideas that are throwing it into a ferment; otherwise, its lands emerge in half lights. For better orientation let us look backward to the early part of our century.


Lothrop Stoddard in the preface to his book The Rising Tide of Color (1920) came to the conclusion that since of her values depend on the quality of life Americans would wisely act to protect this value. Neither Stoddard, nor the many who agreed with him foresaw the psychotic forces that would arise dedicated to destroying the moral man’s values as well as our racial heritage. Because of the acceptance of the new beliefs the changes that have occurred are opposite to those forecast by Stoddard.


The ideas which we have mentioned have become Incorporated in a mystique. This we name The New Mythology.


Unless we can gain a knowledge of how this mystique has arisen we shall be handicapped in combating it. Even if given the facts most men do not accept them, for they are usually adequately prepared only to understand other, normal men. Fortunately we can call on a great philosopher for help.


William James in Pragmatism (1907) called attention to a group to which he gave the name, monists, or as we shall define this term, those dominated by an irrational faith in ideas based on oneness. He brought out the fact that they are subjective thinkers, ruled by their temperaments. In addition to their many a for oneness they have of her characteristics, one of which is of extreme importance in understanding them. For this quality James coined the term tender-minded.


I would judge from James‘ general position that he held extreme monists to be mainly the product of inborn [Page 6] qualities, though he does not clearly so state. Let us be specific. We now know that individuals are born with a temperament fashioned by nature, being a part of their genetic makeup. The monist inherits his qualities.


The normal people who are free from the monist’s mania for reducing everything to oneness, we shall name pluralists.


James, unlike Stoddard, was not trying to catch a glimpse of the future; and this being the case we could not expect him to foreshadow the phenomenal impact that tender-minded monists have had on our age. Therefore, let us take up where James left off.

Continue reading

Posted in Africa, America, Aryan, Brainwashing, Europe, Evolution, IQ, Italy, Political Correctness, Race, Race - Mixing, Race Differences, Spain, Spanish Inquisition, Third World, Western Civilization, White genocide, White Nationalism | Leave a comment

Morgoth’s Review – My General Election Dilemma – Nov 26, 2019 — Transcript

[Morgoth discusses whether you should vote or not in the upcoming elections, given that the choice between the main parties is like being offered the choice between a bowl of puke and a turd sandwich!





Morgoth’s Review


My General Election



Nov 26, 2019


Click here for the video:



Published on Nov 26, 2019


YouTube Description


Buy me a pint here


Thanks to Theberton for the intros and outros





[Intro music and imagery by Theberton.]




Hello again there folks. So I’ve been thinking for the last couple of days, that I should say something about the General election which is on the way. But the problem is, I mean, you may have noticed if you watch my stuff, that I don’t really get into party politics at all. I’ve been burned out with it! I’m one of these people that wandered off the plantation, after the Brexit fiasco and after watching three and a half years of being ripped off and ignored! It kind of broke the camel’s back and I realized that there is a clear agenda of (((cabal))) and their will, will not be defied!


And so if you vote for a party and they promise to reduce immigration, let’s say, it’s just not going to happen. They’ll just ignore it! They’ll just ignore you!


And in the case of Brexit, well it was an “in” or “out”, and I thought they would show their hand. And I was interested in how they would deal with it, how they were gonna carry that through without flouting the basic rules of a liberal democracy. And with this, that’s actually the story of the last three and a half years.


So all I did was confirm in my mind that democracy is a bit of a farce! You can vote on a policy about NHS beds, or something, and yeah, if that’s your big thing, then whooppee-do! You will be able to use your “power of the vote” to change how many beds exist in an NHS ward, or something like that.


But if it’s for something more fundamental to the current state of Britain, in this case, then you’re not! Then you’ll just be bullshitted and lied to, and your vote will be crushed! And the last three and a half years since Brexit has been, that’s been the story of it.


And I’ve came to the conclusion that I didn’t really want to play a ball with this farce anymore. Because it gets to the point where if you’re gonna carry on believing in the theater, you feel like a bit of a moron! You feel like a mug! Because you are then actively participating in this system, which is just a sham! Which is just rubbish! And so you feel like a bit of a muppet for going along with the lies!


And I decided that the moral position was to opt out and say:


I don’t believe the system works, and I’m not gonna endorse it anymore! I’m just gonna opt out and we’ll see how all of this plays out.


So now we look at the current situation where we’ve got yet another General election and we see that the parties lining up and all of that patter is coming out. And I watched a couple of days ago, I watched Academics Agent’s video on Jeremy Corbyn — the Labour Party’s manifesto — just out of interest. And I was actually quite horrified by how far they’re going. I expected heavy taxes. I expect a Corbyn to go after the CEOs and all of that. But what left me quite mortified was the social policy.


Let me just take a couple of steps back here, because some of my friends on the hard Right will back Corbyn, because they know there’s a certain clique who can’t stand him. And then there’s also that they see him as a wrecking ball against the neoliberal, global capital, let’s say. And with his overt, like communistic, socialist policies. He’s gonna lend 850 billion pounds, or something like that. And so it’s a fair argument.


My problem is if he’s gonna blow up the banking system, or whatever the hell it is, then all right fair play. But the problem that I have is the social policy. And as for taxing all of these CEOs and what not, to death, well they’re just gonna take their money! They’re just gonna leave Britain and the wider system will still be intact. All that’s gonna happen is that the so-called “White van man” is gonna be crucified by these taxes! And so you see where there was somebody on [05:01] “Question Time” talking, and he earns 80 grand a year. He was obviously lower middle class, or working class. He probably owned a factory somewhere, probably works about 70 hours a week. And then he was quite shocked to discover that he was actually in the 5%. And that they were gonna absolutely nail him on taxes! And so that’s this huge chunk of middle England, that are gonna have to pay for Corbyn’s socialism.


But then, the problem is the money. It’s not gonna work in the way that some people on the Right think, because the money is not gonna trickle down to a cohesive group. So you can’t think of it in terms of pushing socialism, or the Swedish model of the 1970s where you’ve got to have a very high trust society, and everybody’s watching each other’s backs. It’s a very comfortable, safe, society and people don’t mind paying a huge chunk of taxes.


And the reason you’re not gonna get that is, because the neoliberal social policy is mass immigration and what the centrists would call “identity politics”, pitting one group against another. And everybody’s against each other. Everybody’s aggrieved. Everybody is out for themselves! And this has resulted in the native demographic of atomization and everybody being out for themselves.


And so, I can actually understand it in that context why they’re gonna go and vote Tory. And on this the point here is that Corbyn’s regime is going to be absolutely savage! And so to get back to my original point of not voting, is it then the moral position to remain aloof from the system when you can see these lunatics coming in? Because I just don’t buy this argument that it will upset the, …. It will open up a gap for dissident politics. The dissident politics is going to be extreme neoliberal, socialist, policies! And Corbyn’s out there now saying there’s gonna be much more “White guilt” dripped into the classrooms!


And on top of all of that, it’s the equivalent to having Antifa run your country! That’s what we’re looking at here. And I don’t see how there’s gonna be any kind of opening for a dissident politics of the Right, whatsoever! In fact, when you look at who’s gonna be prominent within the party, those of us in Britain will be lucky not to be in jail by the time we get through it all! Because it will be like having the Unite Against Fascism, or Antifa running the country.


And so to get back to my original point then. Can you still be noble while you see these lunatics taking over the society? They’re in the running to come out on top. Is it a moral position to still do nothing? Even though — and this is what I have to stress, this point — even though the Tories are scumbags themselves? Even though the Tories are just again these neoliberal shills, but then purely in economics. But as far as something like immigration is going, it doesn’t make blind bit of difference! You’re gonna get 300,000, or 400,000 regardless of who comes in, even Corbyn, I think.


And the reason for that, is that I think we are running at maximum capacity for what we can actually handle. I think the system, because we take in the equivalent of a Normandy landing, like every six months, or something. It’s insane! And in terms of just housing and infrastructure, there’s only a certain amount of people can be processed. And I mean, they talk about capping mass immigration, in actual fact, the system works flat-out to facilitate them coming in by the hundreds of thousands! It’s streamlined to perfection! What people call “The Replacement”. And yeah, that’s gonna happen regardless. Corbyn and the Labour Party may want more, they may want to increase the numbers, but I don’t think it’s physically possible, because there’s just nowhere for people to live. And you’re gonna get the same under the Tories! So that’s actually a moot point.


But in terms of nailing our people to the floor and having what Jeremy Corbyn calls, “Social Justice Commissions” operating up and down the land, and then attaching [10:00] themselves to people’s businesses, controlling everything that people think and do. You are beginning to see something quite horrific coming into view here! So then this tests my original idea of saying:


Well politics is a big scam! It’s a big joke!


Like the neoliberals, the money lenders, the top brass, will just move themselves and their assets, their money, and probably their businesses, away from Britain. But we’re still gonna get the transgender issues, we’re still gonna end with all of these racial and ethnic issues. And we’re still gonna have the kids taught “White privilege theory”. It’s just going to be much, much, worse! You’re still gonna get the neoliberal social policy, just the money will have gone.


And so then, you look at the devastation that all of this is going to cause, is it right to say:


Well, I’m not gonna vote?


Even though — and this is where they get you again — even though, you know, that the party you’re gonna have to vote for — whether it’s Farage’s crew, or whether it’s the Tories with Boris Johnson — you know they’re a bunch of scumbags who hate you as well! It’s just that they don’t hate you too extent that the the Labour party does.


So this then is the culmination of the great idea of “democracy”, is that out of blind panic you have to vote for the scumbags who hate you least! And this is where we are now.


And so the problem that I have is that you’re then validating the system! You know, that it’s theater, you know, that nothing positive is gonna come out of this for you! And what you want! You, all right there, if you’re watching this video the world that you’d like to see is neigh on illegal. And anybody who holds your opinions will be purged before they get anywhere near political power! So what you have to do was vote for the scumbags who hate you least! And this is where we are. This is the “Great experiment”.


So you can say:


Well, I’m just not gonna partake in it anymore, and watch the world burn, or wait for the Antifa government to come after you.


Which in my case they’ll probably do. But as far having some sort of positive ideal is complete, complete, tosh! It’s not gonna happen. And so you’re dragged back in! You’re like Al Pacino in “The Godfather Three”. Just when I thought I was out of this madness, just when I thought:


Well, you know what it is? I’m giving up on it. I don’t believe in democracy anymore! And I don’t want a validate the system by voting in it!


Then all of a sudden you find that if you don’t, you’re gonna be having the Social Justice Commission come after you for “hate thought”. And so, you’re forced back into the mold of voting in this complete farce! Because it’s beginning to take a bit of a sinister turn. You’ll never get anything positive. What you’ll get is maybe to stave off the most destructive elements of social justice and cultural Marxism, for a little bit longer. Five years down the road, it doesn’t matter, because the Tories probably have those policies anyway. That’s just what happens, with cuckservatism. So, you’re treading water, or you bite the bullet and say:


Let’s go for it! Let’s do this the “accelerationist” take, which people will say.


So that’s another argument which you see on the Right. Where, yeah:


We know it’s gonna be a madhouse, let’s just get it done and maybe everybody will wake up.


Well the problem with having Antifa in government is that they’re not going to allow any kind of grassroots movement to form. They’re gonna hunt us down with a vengeance, if they get in! And maybe all of the native population will go through hell, and after five years there’s so much dissent in the country of five years of Corbyn, or whatever, that they’re all desperate to vote for the extreme far Right!


You’ll probably see that somebody like UKIP, or For Britain, will see this bump in popularity, if they don’t get banned. But by and large, it will be people who are desperately running back to the Tories, because they’ve got to try and pay off a mortgage. That’s where this is going to go.


And so we’re forced back into this, this theatre! This illusion of democracy! It’s the choice [15:01] between a bowl of puke and a turd sandwich!


And I think, with a very, very, heavy heart I’m gonna have to go and take a slurp on the bowl of puke! Because the consequences of the Corbyn government getting in is something quite quite awful and shocking!


So, that’s my thoughts on the election there, folks. And it’s not particularly happy, or uplifting, but I can’t, I don’t really see any other way out of it.


Well, alright, let’s try and look at the bright side! [chuckling] Well maybe we will get Brexit, again? Like a carrot dangling before a donkey! That is what it is. A farce! Just a big circus! And if you don’t take part in it you’ll get destroyed, if you do the decline we’ll just take a bit longer.


Thanks for listening folks, and I’ll catch you later.




[Outro music and imagery by Theberton.]











See Also





Millennium Woes with Morgoth on Brexit — TRANSCRIPT

Millennial Woes’ Millenniyule 2017 No. 66 – Morgoth — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – YouTube Hangout 01 – Skeptics and Cucks — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – YouTube Hangout 02 – Merry Holocaustmas — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review — Discussing the Government’s Anti-Extremism Agency ”Prevent” With Based British — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review — Hate-Reading The Guardian – Hirsch, Critical Theory & Nihilism, Jan 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review — The Psychotic Left, Feb 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – Fishing For White Pills, Feb 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – Hope Not Hate and the State of Play, Feb 2019 — TRANSCRIPT





PDF Notes

* Total words = 2491

* Total images = 3

* Total A4 pages = xx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)


Version History


Version 4:


Version 3:


Version 2:


Version 1: Nov 30, 2019 — Published post.

Posted in Antifa, BREXIT, Britain, Cuckservatives, Globalism, Jeremy Corbyn, Jew World Order, Jewish Supremacism, Jews - Hostile Elite, Marxism, Morgoths Review, Multiculturalism, Muslim, Race, Third World Immigration, Thought Crime, Traitors - Journalists, Traitors - Politicians, Transcript, White genocide, White Nationalism | Leave a comment

Morgoth’s Review – What If Classic Liberalism Is The Problem? – Oct 29, 2019 — Transcript


[Morgoth describes how classic liberal ideas and their current expression have failed us and have led us to a “clown world” where not only has nonsense — such as transgenderism and other sexual perversions — been promoted, but the whole, society destroying, multicultural agenda has been facilitated.

Liberal ideas chain and blind us to a system that enslaves us to the machinations of a (((cabal))) intent on destroying us, while its gatekeepers such as the smooth talking homosexual Douglas Murray misdirect by describing the ongoing murder of Europe by the cabal and its “goy” traitors, as a “strange death”!





Morgoth’s Review


What if Classic Liberalism

is the Problem?


Oct 29, 2019


Click here for the video:



Published on Oct 29, 2019


YouTube Description


Buy me a pint here


Thanks to Theberton for the intros and outros




[Intro music and imagery by Theberton.]



Hello there again folks. So there’s been another report out this week on the radicalization happening on YouTube. They call it “The Disease of Far-right Ideas Permeating the Platform”. The report says that since 2017 there’s been a drop in views to far-right channels, but classic liberals, safe conservatives, and the “Intellectual Dark Web”, they’re all doing very nicely. And I mean, that’s going to happen. If the system funnels a lot of money and publicity into a false opposition, and then shuts down the genuine opposition, it will have that effect! If you’re gonna play a game of tennis and you chop off your opponent’s arms, then guess what? You win!



And Sargon of Akkad did a video saying that the report was a good reason why he shouldn’t be banned. That the centrists can “hold the line”. The centre will hold them! That classic liberalism and soft conservatives act as a bulwark. And if they get banned, well the far-right is just gonna run rampant all over the platform.


But these discussions are always framed in a certain way. It’s always a question of whether, or not the center can hold, and not whether, or not, it should hold! We’re told that democracy is a wonderful thing, yet nothing that we discuss, or are concerned about was ever voted on! Multiculturalism was imposed on us without a single mandate! Where was classic liberalism then? In actual fact, it’s arguments based on rationalism, economics, and individualism, were being used to actively facilitate the multicultural project! After all, if we’re all just rational individuals with no interests beyond material gain, then what does it matter where somebody comes from?

Continue reading

Posted in Bk - Strange Death of Europe, Europe, Globalism, Hate Speech, Jew World Order, Jews - Tool of, Liberalism, Morgoths Review, Multiculturalism, Propaganda - Anti-German, Slavery, Third World Immigration, Transcript, Uncategorized, White genocide | Leave a comment

Laura Towler – We Were Never Asked – Oct 24, 2019 — Transcript

[Laura Towler and a team of volunteers recently conducted a survey of over 2,000 White British on their opinion on the non-White invasion of Britain that has been occurring in ever greater numbers since the arrival of blacks on the SS Empire Windrush in 1948. The vast majority of White British have always been against this invasion and remain so today, as this survey confirms.

The British people have never been asked whether they wanted this invasion, for the simple reason that they would have rejected it out of hand. Instead, it has been imposed top-down by traitorous “political elite” scum that does the bidding of the (((Money Power))) with the agenda of “genociding” Whites — turning them into despised minorities in their countries — in order to bring about  a jewish “New World Order“.





We Were Never Asked!


Laura Towler


Oct 24, 2019




Click the link below to view the video:


Also on Bitchute:


YouTube Description

Published on Oct 24, 2019

To support my work (from $1 per month): https://www.subscribestar.com/laura-t… – Thank you!

For more information:



British Attitudes to Immigration: https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/2011/brit…

2001 Government Census: https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/2001cen…

2011 Government Census: https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/2011census

Net Migration Figures: https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/stat…

Fertility Rates 1: https://iussp2009.princeton.edu/paper…

Fertility Rates 2: https://www.demographic-research.org/…

School Pupils by Ethnic Group: https://assets.publishing.service.gov…

Live Births by Ethnic Group: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…

White Britons ‘will be minority’ by 2066, says professor: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne…

News & Politics


YouTube Stats


Nov 2, 2019 — Comments = 3,066 — Views = 55,156 — Like = 6,500, Dislikes = 73

Oct 28, 2019 — Comments = 2,356 — Views = 40,054 — Like = 5,200, Dislikes = 49









[Screen text]

The following short film (and it’s supporting website) was made by volunteers.

We did not receive any outside funding for this project.

I would like to take this opportunity to say thank you to everybody who helped collect the data, helped with the website, or provided any other form of support.

And lastly, of course, I would like to say thank you to Mark Collett.

This project would not have been possible without you all.



Part One — The Current Situation



Laura: Since the end of World War Two immigration has always been a hot topic for Britain. It is regularly given a prominent position in party manifestos, in our newspapers, on TV talk show panels, and across social media. It tops opinion polls as one of our greatest concerns. And it can even be argued that it was a key factor in one of Britain’s largest historical democratic exercises to date; our decision to leave the European Union.


Continue reading

Posted in Brainwashing, BREXIT, Britain, England, Family - Anti, Globalism, Jew World Order, Jewish Supremacism, Jews - Hostile Elite, Jews - Tool of, Karlergi Plan, Laura Towler, Mark Collett, Multiculturalism, Muslim invasion, New World Order, Political Correctness, Propaganda, Race, Race - Mixing, Traitors - Journalists, Traitors - Politicians, Transcript, We Were Never Asked, Western Civilization, White genocide, White Nationalism, YouTube | Leave a comment

Millennial Woes at the Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

[Millennial Woes delivers a good speech at the Scandza Forum held in Copenhagen on Oct 12, 2019. His topic was on the delusion of egalitarianism that our corrupt “elites” promote and the necessity for them to lie to the public about their real agenda.

He is optimistic that we can succeed in turning the public to our ideas despite the generations of brainwashing that they have suffered with. He says:

But! We do enjoy an advantage which our opponents 70 years ago lacked. They were working against the public, at every level, and against human nature! We are not! Indeed, this is why they had to be sneaky and subversive. Had they proffered their ideas openly in 1946, the public would have rejected every single one of them.





Scandza Forum


Copenhagen 2019


Millennial Woes




Click the link below to view the video:


YouTube Description


Millennial Woes’ speech “Regenerate Against the Machine”, at the Scandza Forum in Copenhagen in October 2019


Published on Oct 16, 2019



News & Politics











Woes: All right! Hello everyone. Okay, so first of all thank you to Frodi for organizing this conference and inviting me to speak. I would also like to thank a Sikh friend of mine. I have very few of those as you might imagine, so y’all know who he is, for giving me some ideas for this speech. Now, in 2004 the public intellectual Paul Graham wrote the following:


Changes between the past and the present, sometimes do represent progress. In a field like physics if we disagree with past generations, it’s because we are right and they are wrong! But this becomes rapidly less true as you move away from the certainty of the hard sciences. By the time you get to social questions, many changes are just fashion.


And we see this with that, I mean, I don’t think I even need to illustrate this, that clearly a lot of attitudes are that we have today, that are popular today are not based on rationality, or logic, or whatever. It’s simply a change as a people — it is just fashion, trends, fads! People have been persuaded that X is better than Y, but there’s no actual reason for it, or indeed it might be a trick. It might be were there being actively deceived into advocating something that’s bad for them.


And it is interesting sometimes when you see this open contradiction where something that, like, for example, the border wall with Trump. Apparently that’s the worst thing the worst idea the most evil idea in the world! But Democratic politicians were advocating the very same thing ten years ago. I believe Hillary Clinton actually advocated it, and, or Obama, but I’m not sure about that. And in gay marriage, at the start of his presidency Barack Obama opposed gay marriage. But then within a few years it was suddenly an absolute essential that, of course, we have to have gay marriage. Amazing!


However Paul Graham says that this does not happen in the hard sciences, such as physics. But actually that’s not true, because even the hard sciences are affected by fashion. And the other day I was listening to an interview with Douglas Murray and he was talking about the transgender issue. And he said that:


For the first time science is being invited to lie, because saying that gender is performative, women are not naturally feminine, and so on.


But actually and, he’s saying that for the first time scientists are being invited to lie, to bolster a social trend. But honestly that’s not true. This is not the first time. For at least 50 years science has been invited to lie about the question of race, the existence of race. And that’s had interesting consequences all over the place. So, also now, possibly climate change. I don’t know what any of you believe about climate change, but it does seem like something that’s been co-opted by progressive forces. And now if you dare to question it, you’re risking a lot. So it’s no longer a question of logic and rationality. It’s no you are expected to believe this thing, regardless of what objections you might have to it. So yes, even the hard sciences are subject to this. So Paul Graham continues:


Swear words are part of the English language.


Of course, they are part of every language, but he’s speaking about English:


So therefore, because swear words are part of the English language, parents are giving their kids an inaccurate idea of the language by not using swear words. Why did parents do this? Because they don’t think it’s fitting that kids should use the whole language. We like children to seem innocent. Most adults, likewise deliberately give kids a misleading view of the world. One of the most obvious examples is Santa Claus. We think it’s cute for little kids to believe in Santa Claus, but one wonders do we tell them, this stuff further for their sake, or for ours?


That’s Paul Graham. And I thought that was a very [05:00] interesting question.


And I think perhaps it’s the key to understanding why today’s elite are corrupt. I suspect, that a good elite lies to the public. I think every elite inevitably lies to the public. I think it’s just as something that happens. But I think that a good elite lies to the public for the public’s sake. To give them hope, to allow them to simplify things, to allow them to have faith in their society, to enable them to keep going. And I think that a bad elite, lies to the public not for the public’s sake, but for it’s own sake! And the Western elites today, political, academic, media, they lie to the public constantly! Even systematically! And it’s not to benefit the public. Indeed, the lives positively harm the public in the short term, but even more so in the long term.


So, national populism, is a slightly contradictory thing. It is ostensibly the voice of the people, but it is channeled through particular individuals, leaders and intellectuals. A given here is the belief that people need to be led, and that people want to be led. I think the evidence of antifa outside, might back that up. The request that rings out from the public is “Lead us!”. But really this is what the public always asks for. It’s just that most of the time they do it subtly.


People are social creatures wanting to know what the situation is and how to navigate it. And they are hierarchical creatures as well, requiring that the situation and how to navigate it be defined for them by individuals whom they look up to. Very few people want to work everything out for themselves. It’s a difficult thing to do and most people frankly don’t seem to trust their own judgment that much. This is demonstrable. It’s why they seek culture to be guided by. Exemplars to emulate and leaders to follow.


National populism is a call for us to be much more honest about this perennial truth, this situation. The people want leaders who know what their role is, and to take it seriously. The people want leaders who look after them sincerely, who don’t just pertained to. The people want leaders whom they can trust, because the leaders they currently have, they can’t trust! And this applies to political leaders as well as cultural leaders. The commentators and the intellectuals who shaped society.


There is a need for this shake-up, because the leaders we have, and have had for many decades now have fallen into a combination of delusion and dishonesty! G K Chesterton once wrote:


I can trust the uneducated, but not the badly educated. And today’s elites are very badly educated!


Believe it, or not, you can be educated away from honesty, away from sincerity, away from common sense, and away from your kith and kin. In fact, these are all prerequisites for being in today’s elites. Meantime, the common people are as they always were, in need of a shepherd to protect them from danger, but also they are able to sense danger sooner than the Shepherd can. The people should listen to their Shepherd, but also the Shepherd should listen to his people and respect their instincts.


Today’s elites despise the instincts of ordinary people! When people today complain of problems their elites answer them with contempt, complacency, and dishonesty! They either deny that the problems exist at all, or they come up with false analyses and dreadful solutions! For example, the elites solution to the problems of diversity, is more diversity! The elites solution to the problems created by feminism, is more feminism! The elite solution to the warping of masculinity into toxic masculinity, is to keep demonizing masculinity! The elite solution to the public’s revulsion at unisex bathrooms, is more unisex bathrooms! Constantly, the elite solution is to keep doing whatever created the problem that now needs to be solved!


The elite do this, because they are sticking to the program that they have been beholden to for decades. [10:01] The truth is, the elite created all of these problems in the first place! Their central sin was to fall into the delusion of egalitarianism. They insisted that everything and everyone is equal, thus nullifying their own station as an elite! They did this while contradictorily pouring scorn on the White working-class. This exposed their lie, that everyone is equal, but it also absolved them of all moral responsibility. They can then say:


We are not really an elite! Everyone is equal! We are just managers, janitors. We just keep the infrastructure and the economy going! When it comes to morals, ethics, culture, metaphysics, you little people are on your own. You have to decide what is right and wrong! You have to decide how to live! You have to decide what to believe in! And most of all you have to believe in yourself, because everyone is equal!


This middle class, nouveau riche, nihilistic drivel, it’s what led to the Rotherham scandal in Britain. All morals have been negated! All metaphysics vaporized! All social institutions gutted of authority, prestige, respect, and the ability to function!


And it is this model chaos which leads to the desire for national populism. In short, the people are demanding a new elite, because the old elite are severely dysfunctional! Because they are severely dishonest, because they are severely delusional! They preach equality from a patronizing elitist perspective, while jealously guarding their own status as an elite, and openly despising those who are not in the elite. Calling them low information voters, and uneducated Brexit gammon, etc.


Meantime, the common people though flattered by the lie that everyone is equal, understand instinctually that this is not true, and cannot be true. And they don’t want it to be true either, because they want the comfort of an elite that is looking after them. And then there are people like us, in the dissident right, who advocate a return to elitist values, but on an honest footing. We believe the elite should accept that it is an elite, and that it should be an elite, and that it deserves to be an elite. And that the role of an elite is essential for society to function.


But furthermore, we advocate hierarchy while trying to escape the egalitarian orthodoxy, by demanding an egalitarian approach to freedom of speech, so that we can advocate hierarchy! It’s rather ironic. And so we arrive at the rather surreal situation that we have today. An elitist aristocratic paradigm is being proposed from below using a egalitarianism as it’s vehicle. Meantime an egalitarian paradigm is being imposed from above, using democracy as it’s vehicle, but also using anti-democracy as it’s vehicle. For example, opposition to the Brexit referendum and support for the distant EU Parliament, over local politics. But the egalitarianism is also proposed by using elitism as a vehicle, with ideas like:


Only stupid people don’t believe in equality! Only stupid people believe that there are any stupid people!


It’s insane, obviously.


So, it is often said that to combat the progressive elite we need to do our own “long march through the institutions”. There are at least three problems with that.


One they, are hyper aware of us and the threat that we pose. By contrast, the Conservatives whom they usurped seventy years ago, were not worried about them at all. And that’s why those conservatives lost everything.


Two! There isn’t time for another long march through the institutions. They had 70 years. We have maybe 20 years to rescue the West, or least to get onto a good footing again.


And then three. The people that we would be usurping in academia, media, etc., are backed up by not only global corporations, but the governments of virtually every country in the West. Those governments are also very worried [15:02] about us, and are implementing laws to criminalize our ideas. Therefore it is wildly naive to think that we can inject a virus into the system, and the system will calmly allow that virus to take it over. The system is hysterical about us! We are not going to be allowed to be sneaky and subversive! But even if that did happen, as I said, there isn’t time for the virus to do its work. We don’t have 70 years.


But! We do enjoy an advantage which our opponents 70 years ago lacked. They were working against the public, at every level, and against human nature! We are not! Indeed, this is why they had to be sneaky and subversive. Had they proffered their ideas openly in 1946, the public would have rejected every single one of them.


No! We don’t want mass emigration!


No! We don’t want multiculturalism!


No! We don’t want our granddaughters raped by Islamists!


No! We don’t believe that race is a social construct!


No! We don’t believe that male and female are social constructs!


No! We don’t want drag queens teaching our children how to twerk!


No! We don’t believe that everything is relative!


No! We don’t believe that Europe is meaningless, or that we have no special rights to our countries!


No! We don’t believe that Europeans are the cancer of human history!


All of these ideas would have been flatly rejected by the public in 1946. But guess what? They would be flatly rejected by the public in 2019! Even now the progressive elite have to hide their true beliefs from the public. We don’t!


We can be very honest with the public, because we are not opposed to the public. We do not despise the public. We are not trying to betray, trick, replace, or destroy, the public.


We advocates of a new elitism are, though idealistic, grounded in realism. We accept the public as they are.


We accept the old elite as they are. The purveyors of lies, which are creating a perverse and chaotic situation that will culminate with the complete destruction of everything that we hold dear! We accept that egalitarianism is the nullification of everything, and the endangerment of everyone.


And we accept that something desperately needs to change!


Thank you.













See Also:





PDF Notes

Version 1

* Total words = xxx
* Total images = xx
* Total A4 pages =


Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)






Version History


Version 5:


Version 4:


Version 3:


Version 2:


Version 1: Oct 22, 2019 — Published post.

Posted in Brainwashing, Denmark, Europe, Globalism, Hate Speech, Jews - Tool of, Millennial Woes, New World Order, Race, Race - Mixing, Race Differences, Scanda Forum, Transcript, White genocide | Leave a comment

Mark Collett at The Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — Transcript

[Mark Collett delivers a great speech at the Scandza Forum held in Copenhagen on Oct 12, 2019. His topic was the fraudulent nature of our our so-called democracies where the “popular vote” is only only acceptable if it fulfills the agenda of our hostile “elites“, the internationalist cliques, and their puppet prostitute politicians.

The true will of ordinary people is rejected as something bad and is labelled as “populism” by our rulers, since it is opposed to their real agenda of racially and culturally destroying us Whites.

Mark ends on a defiant note with; “… the will of the European people, will soon be heard by all of these parasites and traitors! Our people will come together! They will rise up as one! Not to ask for the scraps from the table! Not to beg for mercy! But to take back our destiny!






Scandza Forum


Copenhagen 2019


Mark Collett



Click the link below to view the video:


YouTube Description

Published on Oct 17, 2019


News & Politics










Mark Collett: Well hello everyone. I’d firstly like to say how nice it is to be here at another Scandza forum, despite what’s going on outside. And I’d like to thank the wonderful Frodi Midjord for inviting me along today, because it’s so great to come out here and meet all you wonderful people.


Now, I just want to say a few words about Frodi before I begin. Because after arranging a similar event in England, I’ve got to say, it is far more stressful arranging an event like this than you could possibly imagine! It really does push you to your limits. And Frodi always looks so cool, he looks so calm, he looks so collected, despite the circus going on outside, people not being able to get in, all the stressful other things that happen. And when I say stressful “other things”, if any of you have arranged even a smaller event, the stressful “other things” also push you over the edge.


But I think it’s a sign of a true leader, when, under such heavy fire, under such circumstances that would cause normal men to break, he just looks so calm and carries this off so perfectly! So, it really is an honor to know him.


And I’d also like to thank him today, because he said to me before I came, he said:


Mark, I only want you to speak for 20 minutes.


And I thought:


That’s really great! Because I get to fly all the way to Denmark, somewhere I’ve never been, meet all these wonderful people, have dinner with everyone, and I only get to do, or have to do, half the work that I’m usually expected to do!


And when he asked me to speak about the issue of “populism”, it was something that I could have said an awful lot more about. And it’s something I was very, very, eager to speak about. Because in the last few years the media have been talking about “populism” constantly! About this malevolent specter of “populism” that is rising up! And, it’s casting a shadow across the Western world, across all European nations! And all nations, in fact, which would have been referred to as Western nations, America and Australia too.


And the media have been very, very, very quick to decry populism as this great threat to democracy. As a threat to liberal values, as a threat to freedom of speech, and as a threat to almost Western civilization itself!


So I thought to myself:


What actually is populism? What does populism mean? What is this threat, that threatens us all, that threatens this wonderful democracy we live in?


Well, I defaulted to something that isn’t really our friend, to Google, and I asked:


What is populism?


And the answer that was spat back at me was:


A political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups.


And that made me think:


Wow! That sounds pretty good, doesn’t it?


I mean, when you read that, you would think populism would be a good thing! And that the “populist”, the people leading this populist revolution, the people who are actually standing up for ordinary folk, that they would be the heroes. That they would be the good guys! But no! According to the press, according to the media, according to the establishment, we’re, in fact, or the “populist” should I say:


Are the greatest evil of our time!


The populists, are in fact, the bad guys! They’re the ones who are threatening everything we hold dear.




Now that’s all a little bit strange, because we’re repeatedly told that we live in a “democracy”. And that’s the key word, because a democracy is a system where the ordinary people are meant to have representation in Parliament. And the key word there, the word that should be underlined in that sentence, is “representation”. Now, democracy is not meant to be a system where you elect someone to tell you what to do. You don’t go to the polling booth to elect someone to tell you how to think, to tell you how to feel. You’re not going to the polling station to elect someone who is meant to impose their will upon you. You’re going there, you’re going to the polling station, you’re marking your little cross in the box, and you’re popping it in the box, because you’re meant to be voting for someone to represent you in Parliament!


And that makes sense, because Parliament is a huge building. It’s a really large building. But it’s not that big. It’s not big enough to hold us all. It’s not big enough, so that we can we’ll just jump into our car travel down to Parliament and have our say when something is happening. Because if we did that, there’d be utter chaos! And there’s far more people in Britain who want to have a say in how the nation is run, than could ever fit into a single building.


So they’ve broken Britain down into constituencies. And in those constituencies the people, the constituents, elect someone to represent their views in Parliament. So each individual constituency sends one person to represent the ordinary people, so that the ordinary people get to have their voices heard. And that really makes sense, because it saves everyone in that constituency having to gang together, get in buses, get in their cars, you know, go down to London to have a say. It all makes perfect sense when you think about it.


But then you look at it and think, well “parliamentary democracy” — this system of electing one person to represent the ordinary people — by its very nature it seems to be exactly the same as the system of populism that the media hates! You know, ordinary people are voting for candidates and the winner of the popular vote, they get elected, they go to Parliament, and then they put forward the opinions of the ordinary people. That does sound like a good system.


But then you think isn’t it rather odd that the press, the media, the establishment, they’re all decrying populism! They’re all attacking the idea of ordinary people being represented in Parliament. They’re attacking the idea that ordinary people should have their voices heard. But at the same time as attacking populism, they’re all saying “democracy is sacred”! Democracy is central to our way of life! They tell us the importance of this wonderful democracy, and how our societies stand above all other societies in the world, because of that parliamentary democracy.


And you’re thinking to yourself:


None of this adds up. You’ve got democracy on one hand. You’ve got populism on the other. And the media is saying ‘populism’ is bad, yet ‘democracy’ is good, and that they, in fact, opposites!


But it goes further than that. They’re not just opposites, the politicians, the press, the media, they say populism is actually a threat to democracy! One threatens the existence of the other! And that populism, because he threatens this wonderful democracy, it needs to be curtailed! It needs to be stopped! We need to stop these evil populists from representing the ordinary people, because otherwise our freedom, our liberty, our entire way of life, will disappear as we know it!


And, at this point, I’m sure everyone in the room has got the message. It’s all getting quite clear, that the media attack populism — yet they praise democracy — because democracy in its current form, and populism — two things that should be the same — are, in fact, very different forms of governance. One represents the people, the other ignores the people!




And democracy — the system which is meant to be a system of representation of ordinary people — is now no longer anything to do with representing ordinary people!


So I thought, we should probably dig a little deeper into the terms that liberals use, the terms that are used by the establishment, the media, and the press, and we should look at those terms and we should translate them. We should provide a translation service from “liberal speak” into English!


So we’re going to look at three words, or three terms: “democracy”, the “popular vote”, and “populism”. And we’ll start with the term “democracy”..


Now we all know what democracy should be. We know what it should mean. We know it should be about representation. But what does it mean when that word is being spoken by a liberal? When you hear a liberal say “democracy”, let’s translate that “liberal-speak” into English. Because, when a liberal says democracy, you’re not talking about representation. You’re talking about a system of voting for an out-of-touch “gun-for-hire”. And that’s a very nice way of putting it, because when you say “gun-for-hire”, you think of some kind of Western hero in the Wild West doing something heroic.


So let’s not call them “guns-for-hire”, let’s call them “prostitutes”. [laughter] You vote for a prostitute, and crucially, you don’t vote for the prostitute that you like the best! [laughter] You vote for the prostitute you dislike the least! And that’s a very important point. That’s a crucial part of this process! Because few people still vote for a candidate that they really like. Instead they look at all the candidates and say:


I really don’t like him, and I don’t like him either, but I really hate him! So I’m gonna vote for him, who I dislike, because it’s better than him over there, who I really hate!


And that’s what happens in England. You know, you hear people saying all the time:


Oh the Tories and Labour, I can’t stand any of them! So who did you vote for? Oh I voted Tory. Why? Because I really hate Labour!


And then, on the other hand:


Ahh, I’m not a fan of any of those people in Parliament. Well did you vote? Yeah, I voted Labour, because me dad said ‘Never vote Tories, because they’ll be far worse than Labour’.


And you’re stuck in this system of voting for people that you don’t really want to vote for!


So, you start by voting for the candidate, or prostitute, that you dislike the least. And then that prostitute goes to Parliament on your behalf. But they don’t represent you. But instead they prostitute themselves to big business, to special interest groups, to internationalist causes. And when in Parliament that prostitute sits there, and basically implements whatever they want, what benefits them personally, what benefits their paymasters! And they do all of this regardless of what their constituents want. In fact, once elected most of these prostitutes, actually do the very opposite of what the people who voted for them — the people who voted for that prostitute to represent them — they do the opposite of what those people want!


So in short, what do liberals really mean when they say “democracy”? Well, this is the translation; democracy — in liberal-speak — is a system of electing the prostitute that you dislike the least, so he, or she, can then represent the interests of someone else, often to your detriment!


Now we’ll move to definition two, the “popular vote”. Now everyone knows what the popular vote is meant to mean. It’s meant to mean the total number of votes cast. It’s meant to mean all the people who go to the polling station to put their little mark, little cross, in the box, and pop their little a piece of paper in the ballot box.


Now again, this is very strange, because the vast, vast, majority of people who go to the polling station to put their little piece of paper in the box, who are those people? Well you’ve probably guessed it. They are actually ordinary people. The vast majority of people who vote, are ordinary people. But this isn’t “populist”, this is the “popular vote”.


So what’s the difference between ordinary people voting for something, and that being populism, and the popular vote? Well in the liberal system of democracy, the people are, of course, not voting for what they actually want, they [15:01] are presented with a narrow selection of candidates, narrow selection of options, which are all pre-approved and pre-chosen by the establishment.


So you can clearly see that it’s only “populism” when people get to vote for someone who they actually like! Who they actually want to vote for, who actually stands up for the ordinary people. In liberal-speak the vote is only popular and democratic when the person elected doesn’t represent the people who elected them! You see “popular” is always seen as good. When the press talk about popular it’s always good. But it’s only good, it’s only right, it’s only the correct thing, when “popular” chooses the right candidate, when it chooses the candidate that the establishment, the internationalists, and the media want.


So, when a voter elects a candidate who wants open borders, who wants to flood us with low IQ migrants, who wants to put GDP on a pedestal, who wants us all being attacked in the street by people who shouldn’t belong here, well, when somebody votes them in, that’s “popular”! Democracy’s triumphed! We all give ourselves a pat on the back! We cheer! What a wonderful system we live in! And the media and the press, they all congratulate themselves, they congratulate the system. And we are told by these people that we should all honor that result. And whatever the prostitute who’s been elected wants to do, we should adhere to that with slavish devotion! Because the popular vote has triumphed, and that is the will of the people.


So if the current ruling prostitutes let’s in those millions of low IQ migrants who create chaos, we have to sit there clapping like seals! We have to applaud it! We have to say it was the right thing, because the prostitute who is doing this, or the group of prostitutes, they won the popular vote!


So those low IQ migrants flooding our towns and cities, well, that’s what we wanted, isn’t it? That’s the will of the people! But, if one of these populists, one of these awful threats to democracy, ends up on the ballot paper and the people do the unthinkable and elect them into Parliament, or a regional body, and they elect somebody that really represents them.


If the ordinary people elect someone who actually represents them! Democracy has failed! Democracy has failed us all and the vote must be recast, or the candidate must be impeached, or we must have a second run at the referendum! And we’ll keep having a second run, in fact, we’ll have a third run, we’ll have a do-over, and we’ll do it again, and again, and again, until the establishment, and the media, and the press, get the result they want!


Because, the result is only “smiled upon” when the people make the “right choice”, when they elect the “right candidate”. When people elect the “right candidate”, it’s “popular”! When people elect the “wrong candidate” it’s “populism”! Do you see what they’re doing there? “Popular” is good, “populism” is evil.


And that takes us on to the third and final definition. Which is, of course, “populism”. Populism is the final piece of this puzzle it’s the final part of this interesting use of language. In reality, populism; the will of the people. It’s what ordinary people want. And it means true representation of people at grassroots level. It means talking about issues that ordinary people care about. It means saying:


We don’t want loads of low IQ foreigners flooding our lands, and taking our jobs, and raping young girls in Rotherham, in Telford.


It means talking about these grooming gangs and saying:


Why aren’t the police doing something about it?


It means saying:


The EU hasn’t been a good thing for our people.


It means talking about all the issues that we speak about! And the issues we speak about, are the same issues that normal people, in their homes, on a daily basis, talk about when they know they’re not being listened to by people who might report them to bodies and groups that want to shut up the ordinary people! And ultimately it means electing candidates who are free. [20:00] Who do not serve special interest groups. Who do not serve minorities. Who do not serve shady (((financiers))), or media hacks. It means electing people who are free of the strings that are attached to the claws of the (((internationalist clique))) !


You see, once the riddle of democracy, the popular vote, and populism, is all translated, once the “liberal-speak” is put into plain English, it becomes very, very, clear as to why the media and the press and the establishment hate populism so much, and why they’re so viciously opposed to it. They hate populism, because populism is actually true democracy. It’s the will of the people! And ultimately the media, the establishment, and the internationalists, do not want the will of the people to be expressed! Because the will of the people is a threat to their power!


And from the very beginning of this speech, I’ve kept using one phrase, and that’s “ordinary people”. And a theme has emerged throughout this short speech, a theme of the media and of the establishment wishing to take away the voice of the ordinary people! And ensuring that ordinary people don’t have a say. That the wishes of ordinary people are not represented!


And why is that? Well, quite simply, those who run the media, the internationalist clique pulling the strings of the prostitute politicians, they are not ordinary people! In fact, they hate the ordinary people! And they do not want the ordinary people to take their destiny into their own hands. Because what is good for the ordinary people, is not good for those who run the media, for those within the establishment, for the internationalists! And the opposite is true. What is good for the internationalists, what is good for those in the media, what is good for those in the establishment, is not good for ordinary people!


But, I still haven’t got to the bottom of this. I keep saying “ordinary people”, but who are the “ordinary people”? Who are the people having their will suppressed, the ones the internationalists want to control and deny a voice? Who are the people being disenfranchised, the people being turned into second-class citizens? Well, those people are the indigenous people of Europe! They are the people of European descent. They are us!


And the establishment, the media, the internationalists, they want to deny us a voice, because they hate us! They hate those of European descent! And what’s more, they want us gone! They want us bred out of existence and replaced in our own ancestral homelands! Thus, the internationalists have fashioned a system to do away with us. And they call it “democracy”! And they tell us we have a choice. But every time we choose something they don’t like, every time we vote outside of their narrow list of options, they go beserk and they decry our choice as “populism”! Because their system of democracy doesn’t present real choice. Because it was never intended to present real choice!


The so called “liberal democracy” presents the illusion of choice! Because the key to all this, is when you believe you are free, when you have the illusion of choice, you are much less likely to rebel! You’re less likely to try to break free from the cage that has been built around you! And wouldn’t that be the greatest kind of bondage, the greatest kind of cage? A prison where the inmates believed that they were, in fact, free and had a choice! And that’s the truth of the matter. The democracy that is promoted by the media and the establishment is just another tool of control! Just another way of ensuring that those of European descent will never be free!




But amongst all the liberal doublespeak, amongst all the babble, there is one truth. Our enemies do speak one truth. And that is that populism threatens their illusion of democracy! Populism threatens to wipe away their corrupt system, and do away with the political prostitutes that rule over us! Populism threatens to set our people free! Because populism is the will of the people, not the will of the internationalist clique!


And that begs a question. What is the will of the people? What is the will of our people? What do those of European descent want? What do we want so much that the internationalists fear and hate so much? Well, we want the one thing that they will never accept! We want to exist! We want to prosper! We want to celebrate our culture, our traditions, and our heritage! We want a future in our ancestral homelands, and we want a future for our children!


And the reason the internationalists, and their puppet politicians, are making so much noise about populism, is because they are scared! They’re scared that our people have started to stir! That our people are starting to speak up! And maybe, you can hear it. It may have started as a whisper, as a murmur, amongst the crowds, but the voice of the European people is getting louder! And more, and more, of us are daring to stand up! More and more of us are ready to be heard! Ready to stand up against the establishment, and dare to speak the words that are becoming the act of defiance of our age!


And the popular will of our people, the act of defiance, the will of the European people, will soon be heard by all of these parasites and traitors! Our people will come together! They will rise up as one!


Not to ask for the scraps from the table! Not to beg for mercy! But to take back our destiny! And to state clearly and unequivocally that we will not be replaced!


Thank you.


[loud applause and cheering]











See Also:





PDF Notes

Version 1

* Total words = xxx
* Total images = xx
* Total A4 pages =


Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)






Version History


Version 5:


Version 4:


Version 3:


Version 2:


Version 1: Oct 19, 2019 — Published post.

Posted in Bk - The Fall of Western Man, Britain, Denmark, Europe, Globalism, Jews - Hostile Elite, Jews - Tool of, Karlergi Plan, Mark Collett, Media - jewish domination, Multiculturalism, Muslim "Grooming" Gangs, Muslim invasion, Nationalism, Propaganda, Scanda Forum, Speech, Traitors - Journalists, Traitors - Politicians, Transcript, Uncategorized, Western Civilization, White genocide, White Nationalism | Leave a comment

Red Ice TV – Extinction Rebellion, Our Future of Bugs and Pods – Morgoth’s Review – Oct 10, 2019 — Transcript


[Red Ice’s Henrik interviews Morgoth, of Morgoth’s Review, on the current “astro-turf” psyop operation called “Extinction Rebellion“, no doubt financed by Orgjew organizations, such as Soros, and others, that allows young people to “rebel” by prancing and dancing around in defense of a global tyranny.





Red Ice TV


Extinction Rebellion


Our Future of Bugs and Pods


Morgoth’s Review




Click the link below to view the video:


YouTube Description

Published on Oct 10, 2019

#ExtinctionRebellion #ClimateScare #Bugs
Extinction Rebellion, Our Future of Bugs & Pods – Morgoth’s Review
•Oct 10, 2019
Red Ice TV
334K subscribers

Morgoth’s Review joins Henrik to talk about the many issues facing the United Kingdom. We begin on the Extinction Rebellion, a new climate weapon the globalists use to get even more money, power and influence. We talk about the promotion of bug eating and pod living. In the second part we discuss demographics, Islamization of England, rise in knife crime, corporate support of milkshake activism and Brexit.

Guest links:

Sign up for a membership at 👉🏻https://redicemembers.com. Get full access to our extensive archives, watch or listen to all our shows. Stream or download over 1800 programs, including radio shows, videos, TV segments & our live show Weekend Warrior. You get access to exclusive videos. All new videos are made available to members first.

👕 Get Our New T-Shirts Here: https://redice.tv/store



⭐️ Donate:
Cash.App: https://cash.me/$redicemembers
Donorbox: https://donorbox.org/red-ice
Swish (Sweden): 076 815 68 01

Donate Bitcoin and other Cryptocurrencies:
BTC: 1CfFFSB3aJqPtynJhsVvK5xm3UAJHNsvZ6
ETH: 0x93af71a3d5bf92e859b05b9e0de0f1985a2c9ce5
LTC: LdyptdN7XyqD6jGYUiTVA9RbiP5vBGADmc
BAT: 0x93af71a3d5bf92e859b05b9e0de0f1985a2c9ce5
XRP: rEb8TK3gBgk5auZkwc6sHnwrGVJH8DuaLh
XRP Deposit Tag: 103245046

Want to donate another crypto? Email us at redice@protonmail.com and we can provide wallet address for virtually any crypto.

Watch our content on the Brave Browser and support us with BAT (Basic Attention Coin)
🌐 Get Brave via our affiliated link: https://brave.com/red091

Thank you for your help! We can not continue without your support.

Send mail or donations to Henrik or Lana:
1866 C. Market St PMB 315
Harrisonburg, VA 22801


🔗 More Red Ice: https://redice.tv
🔗 Red Ice Members: https://redicemembers.com
🐦 Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/redicetv
👍🏻 Like us on Facebook: https://facebook.com/RedIceCreations
📰 RSS feeds: https://redice.tv/rss
✈️ Join our Telegram group: https://t.me/redicetv
🇷 Join Riot Chat rooms: https://riot.im/app/#/group/+redice:m…
📺 Follow us on Dlive: https://dlive.tv/redicetv
🖼️ Follow us on Instagram: https://instagram.com/redicemedia
💡 Follow us on Minds: https://minds.com/RedIceTV
🎤 Listen to us on Spreaker: https://www.spreaker.com/show/red-ice…
📺 Subscribe to our main YouTube channel Red Ice TV: https://www.youtube.com/user/RedIceRa…
📺 Subscribe to our backup YouTube channel Red Ice Media: https://www.youtube.com/user/RedIceMe…
📺 Subscribe to our BitChute channel: https://www.bitchute.com/redicetv/


Thank you so much for your support!

#ExtinctionRebellion #ClimateScare #Bugs
News & Politics










Henrik: Well ladies and gentlemen welcome back thank you so much for joining us today Henrik here with Red Ice TV. Today with another great show for you lined up with Morgoth’s Review. He’s a gentleman that I’ve tried to get on the show for some time. Actually a really good video made by Aaron Kasparov back, maybe two years ago, maybe even more. I forget when it was. And it was an article written by Morgoth’s Review about — essentially to boil it down into the most simplest sense — Sargon’s promotion of individualism, versus the efficacy of collectivism, or how the collective can operate against the individual.


We might have some time to talk about that later, but that’s kind of an argument that wasn’t that prominent at the time but it has since been. So maybe a little bit less urgent to discuss that, if you will. But anyway, Morgoth, great to have you with us today! How’s everything on your end?


Morgs: I’m doing very well thanks. Thanks for having me on. It’s nice to finally appear on Red Ice, because I was a little bit, just used to blogging in the past and not doing audio and things. But I’m a lot more comfortable with it now


Henrik: Nice. Yeah, of course, you do, you have a in addition to your blog, you do have a YouTube channel now. You do YouTube videos.



How regularly? Like one every week, every other week? What would you say.


Morgs: About two a week. It depends on unlike real life work and stuff


Henrik: Yeah


Morgs: But I go for trying, even when I was just doing the blog, I would always try and get something substantial out for the weekend. And the reason why I started doing YouTube videos was because it was easier to turn on a mic and sort of talk for a little bit, than blogging.



Like writing was actually hard work when you added it, and on top of doing a normal job, actually writing a 1,000 word article twice a week, was quite a lot. And I thought on YouTube I can just kind of speak it. And it was after I went on Millennial Woes I had some more confidence and decided to do it more. Because I first always worried nobody would be able to understand what I was saying, because I’ve got a thick North East accent, but it doesn’t seem to matter.


Henrik: You’re coming in loud and clear? [laughter] we can hear just fine. Now it’s great to have you here, and thank you for doing what you’re doing as well. Some of your videos are magnificent, really good! We’re just talking before we got on here, watching, not you’re absolutely latest one, but the one before that about the “Extinction Rebellion”. And that is something want to talk about as well. But we’re talking about your intro a little bit, which is hilarious! About the theme music which finally, … I called it the first time I heard it was like:


Oh it’s from Superman.


But then I Googled it and I couldn’t find it. But it let’s look at this folks, because I think you’ll enjoy it as well. Here it is here. I’ll turn up the volume a little bit here as well so people can hear that. There we go! Look at this



Nice! Alright! [laughter]


Morgs: The whole thing with “Hate Reading the Guardian” was — especially when I was doing the blog — I became kind of used to covering some very, very, heavy (((subjects))) which we can’t really talk about on YouTube now. And it was nice to go from that, to sort of deliberately going for ridiculously low hanging fruit and just rolling with it and having some fun with it. Because you can get bogged down in the really serious stuff. And so I try for like once a month, or something, to look at just the most ridiculous article I can find at the Guardian and then just tear to bits and have a big laugh at it! Because that’s what it deserves. And I think it’s good for morale, as well.



Henrik: Exactly I mean, that’s what it is. Ridicule is a very effective weapon in our arsenal. It’s certainly used by our enemies as well against the things that they don’t like. And it’s now there’s such easy targets, as you say, — it’s amazing that there aren’t more well, you know what? Movies, TV shows? And I mean, it’s even that some of their own are starting to eat each other over the ridiculousness! But it’s a it’s, as you say, it’s a fruit ripe for picking. But anyway, so this is a lot of fun, what you do going into the Guardian and looking at some of their articles, making fun of it and breaking it down. How long have you been doing the blog, though, before we talk about that, before we go into actually stuff about the “Extinction Rebellion“?



Morgs: I started the blog in 20, it was Christmas of 2014 going into 2015. And the reason why I got stuck with [the name]Morgoth’s Review” was, because I would go on The Daily Telegraph in the comment section and at Brietbart, and I was always, you know, trolling and trying to red pill people under the main articles. But I kept getting banned! And when I would go back I would have a different Tolkien-esque name.


And then, I finally got just tired of being banned and I happened to be on the one called “Morgoth” when I opened up the blog. I thought I want to have a place where I can’t be banned anymore. And I’m learning all of this stuff and I want to just write it on my own blog where I can’t be banned, rather than just sort of fritter it away on all of these comments which just keep disappearing, because they’re being deleted all of the time. And so eventually that’s how it ended up being “Morgoth’s Review”.


Henrik: Is that how you, sorry to interrupt, is that how you got the very thoughtful URL of nwioqeqkdw dot com as well? [laughter]


Morgs: Because I didn’t know what I was doing! With technology, and I tried writing it in and it wouldn’t accept it. And I ended up just mashing me hand into the keyboard! And then that one it did accept! So that’s how great things are born!


Henrik: People should feel fine about searching for Morgoth’s Review, it’s actually the top three results, I was surprised, I’m encouraged by that! That’s great! Google actually spat out your blog, your YouTube channel, and your Twitter account on that


Morgs: Yeah, well it’s not a title that triggers the algorithms really. And to be fair, I’ve always had a very heavy focus on sort of pop culture and movies, and what’s going on in the here and the now, as well.


Henrik: Yes


Morgs: So I’ve tended to fly under the radar quite a lot.



Henrik: All right. Well why don’t we talk a little bit about “Extinction Rebellion”? Obviously you’re in the UK, so that we could talk about some of the things going on over there. I mean, there’s so many things to discuss about, from demographics, to crime, to Islamification, to all these kinds of things.


But one of the bigger movements right now is — well in addition to I guess the Brexit issue that’s happening and we’ll hopefully we can squeeze that into here a bit later — but the “Extinction Rebellion”, the climate craze is just out of control in a lot of Western European countries right now.


The states included unfortunately, you know, this Swedish young girl Greta Thunberg is kind of heading, is really becoming the face of that. I did a video on that too that was going down fairly well. But what can you say about the “Extinction Rebellion” and is it is that something that came out of Britain? I think I’ve seen the most of that particular movement out of the UK, if I’m not mistaken


Morgs: Yeah, well the social media and stuff, they talk about having like what, I don’t know what you’d call them, “cells”, or something, but across 60 countries. But it definitely seems to be centered around London. That’s where the hub is. Which is interesting, because London is like the historical city of the (((money power))) and globalism, and whatnot.



And this is where they’ve chosen to be most prominent. I believe today, or yesterday they’ve shut off an airport. And one of the main airports for London’s being shut down, because of them. And yeah as you see on the screen there, they wear all of this freakish garb and terrify everybody.


But they have largely been mocked, because they don’t look like a grassroots movement. A grassroot movement doesn’t look like that. A grassroots movement has a couple of signs with some with some cheap paint on them. And this looks very professional and also very middle-class by the way.


Henrik: Right.


Morgs: Very, very middle-class! And it’s a bit ridiculous to be honest. Imhr but that I think I mean, I got into it on me me “Guardian Hate Read”. They’re pushing on an open door, because what they’re saying to the elites, is you have to have more power and more control to save the planet. They have arrested quite a few of them. But by and large, it’s seems a bit fake. I mean, last week they had a fire engine which spray-painted this red dye all over, …


Morgs: Yeah, I saw that.


Morgs: … The Exchequer, or something. And then they have obviously never done real work before, because they didn’t understand how to [10:00] handle a high-pressure hose! And it spun out of their hands and went everywhere. But there was like a Channel for News team was on hand to record it all. And you have to ask:


Well where did you get a fire engine and why did the security services allow you to park it outside of such like one of the most prominent buildings in London?


Where they wander into the very seat of power in Britain! And Mark Collett said on his show last night, that if it was a nationalist group, or some dissident right-wing group who did that, they’d be called terrorists, and absolutely destroyed by the security forces! And yet in the case of “Extinction Rebellion” the police danced along with them! They actually danced along with it, and get on board! It’s very strange


Henrik: I’m looking for the tweet. There’s one gal on Twitter I think she goes by, yeah “The European Housewife”. Oh there it is. Let me pull that up there to you. Because she had that on her tweet as well. She said:


My husband is a fireman, and it’s impossible to steal a fire engine. The keys are locked up and have GPS trackers. They know exactly where it is at all times. It’s hard to start up and drive one. Takes special training and we have security. Something is off here.



In other words, kind of implying that someone on the inside was more than willing to help out in this little stunt.


Morgs: Yeah. It makes you wonder.


Henrik: Yeah. Which kind of goes to the heart of what you’re talking about here. That this is essentially a globalist run promotion, a campaign essentially, to get people to, yes, essentially if we just dive down into the essentials of this. Give up power that’s what they were arguing in The Guardian article too, that you go through, right. We have to have more control! You don’t know what’s best for you, because we’re all gonna die in — I don’t know, what they pick up on this green New Deal story about 12 years I guess as well. We’re all gonna die in 12 years, therefore give us all the control, give us all the money, and we’ll take care of you! We’ll keep you safe! Right?


Morgs: Yeah. Well they are demanding that the elite take that power and then do it. And so in The Guardian article that I went through, Polly Toynbee was actually saying they should ban beef.



And you end up in a situation where we are all going to be put in pods, and we’re all going to have maggot sausages in Mega City One! And Extinction Rebellion is demanding that the global elite actually do that! Now the way to look at this I think, is if you remove that Extinction Rebellion from the equation, and then this is what the global elite want to have happen anyway. It’s all about just making you a unit of consumption and production, living in your pods and eating maggots, maggot burgers.



And then if they were to just come straight out with that, then everybody’s gonna riot in the streets and say this is ridiculous! You know, if the [word unclear] at the European Union, or the head of the IMF for the United Nations, if they said:


Okay here’s the plan. We are going to ship you all of these megacities and put you in these little pod complexes, and we’re going to put chips in your arms, and have a cashless society. And you just have to work and consume until you die.


Then everybody would reject the program outright. What Extinction Rebellion does, is add a sort of moral framework to that. So then it becomes the “moral thing” to do. They want to get from A to C, but you have to bring in B, which then adds the moral part of the equation. Because then they can see:


Oh! We’ve got no choice! We have to do this to save the planet!


And it becomes much easier when you have a controlled opposition, like Extinction Rebellion.



Henrik: Yes, exactly! But this is what they do, they create movements which you which they, you know, kind of pose as grassroots, or this comes from the people, or whatever. But it’s to say they’re very advanced in terms of the marketing of this, the logos, the flags and everything. And I honed in a little bit on their symbolism as well, which is the hourglass. I think they even release a free paper, by the way, that you can get it. I would assume it’s in the UK called the “Hourglass” which is interesting enough. This theme of:


We’re running out of time! There is no more time! We have to act now! Don’t think!


There are no rational thinking about this:


We’re all gonna die!


It’s a scare tactic essentially to gain as much power in as quick time as possible. [15:00]


Morgs: And this also has an effect on children


Henrik: Oh yeah.


Morgs: I don’t know if it was in Britain, or not, but there was a young boy actually committed suicide, because — I think it may have been in Britain — he had sort of been saturated in this apocalypse. This idea that the ice is going to melt, the sun’s gonna burn the planet up, we’re all going to die in 12 years! And a lot of children are being completely traumatized by it. And one one young boy committed suicide, because of it — if I’m reading it rightly. And, of course, the more minor part of that would be where the children will then put extra pressure on the parents to support the agenda.



Henrik: Yeah. There’s BBC climate change:


Twelve years to save the planet? Make that 18 months.


Lol that was released in July 2019. So they’re certainly not doing anything to mitigate this traumatization of the kids. But the reason why this is so effective as well is, because of “guilt”, right? That’s why they wheel children at the front of this thing. They’re hiding behind the kids, so that they can cry, and scream, and be traumatized by it:


Mommy! Daddy!


Or whoever they’re calling on saying:


Do something! Why are you not doing anything?


And it guilts the adults into thinking:


Well, what do we do? What’s the option?


And then you have the Extinction Rebellion groups out there saying:


Well just give the elites all the power and things will be great!


Morgs: I mean, the BBC article, it’s interesting when they released that, because we were having like the summer heat wave at the time. So everybody was walking around in their shorts and the T-shirts with a bottle of water. Everybody was hot and getting sunburned. And then somebody’s decided now was a good time to role this out, this idea that this is going to be the norm. This is a psychological thing where:


Yeah just look at it now. This is what it’s gonna be like on Christmas Day! And you’ve only got [words unclear]


Henrik: Oh God, it’s pathetic!


Morgs: There was one picture of a man and he was in London, like part of the Extinction Rebellion, and he had a photograph of his two children, and he laid down in the street crying holding the picture of his two children. As if they had both just been killed in some awful accident!



And so a reporter went over and said they’re like:


What are you doing? What the hell is this?


And then he just turned around and said:


Oh, I’m here with a protest. It’s okay. It’s all fine.


And so [the reporter] said:


What is it.


And he said:


Watch, I’ll show you.


And then he put his head back down looked at the photo again and started crying! It was all just a theater! Just, it’s ridiculous!


Henrik: Yeah! It’s a show. And, of course, many of these stunts that Extinction Rebellion do on the streets in the UK, is to do “Die-ins”, right? They lay down and die! They have coffins with them, and all this kind of stuff


Morgs: Yeah


Henrik: It’s like a death cult, right?


Morgs: Yeah you can see it even in the clothes that they wear. It is like a death cult. This is the end of the world. And, of course, I mean, this isn’t this isn’t new.


Henrik: No.


Morgs: They’re doing it again but for political ends


Henrik: Yeah exactly. I think it was Dave Vance on Twitter, he was posting a lot of the stuff here, in the last couple of days



They’re doing like dancing to raves things, they’re doing weird things on the streets. And it’s like:


What are they doing? Who’s this for exactly?


I think it was this. Let’s turn on the audio on this one. They’re like raving away and this, like [word unclear] and stuff like that here.



What the hell! [laughter] Oh all right, that seems to that seems to fix the climate right there Morgoth!


Morgs: I remember a meme of Oswald Spengler which just has his sort of miserable serious face, and he says:


I don’t want to say that I told you so, but I told you so!


Henrik: Yup!


Morgs: [word unclear] kind of materializing through that craziness there. This is where civilizations go to die!


Henrik: That is absolutely correct. I mean, it is interesting in that way. I mean, they don’t, they haven’t picked the death theme, if you will, for the same reasons that we kind of identified them with that as well. But it does interlock in an interesting way, these different positions. That it’s like:


Yeah it’s the death of our civilization.


This is peak Western world right now, and he’s obsessed about death and we’re all gonna die. And it’s almost like an embracing of it — I mean, sure they come with this idea, we have to stop it in whatever, but it almost feels like there’s a kind of a “sadistic embracement” of it! You see what I’m getting at?


Morgs: Yeah, I definitely do. I mean, what’s interesting to think of, I mean, I talk about pop culture, because I think and we all know, you know, we all know (((who))) controls it. And well, that’s why it’s interesting to look at this. This dichotomy between is this just something in the zeitgeist, or is this people making decisions — in this case it would be Hollywood studios?


But what I do find interesting is that in the Cold War in the 1950s, 1960s, you had that like 10-minute warning and people genuinely thought that missiles could land and wipe out life on Earth. And that it could happen at any moment. And yet the culture itself would be quite optimistic. So you would you do the “undercover” where you had, again, school kids hiding under their desks, because the Russians might launch their nukes. And people had to live with all this, all of the time. But then they would go through that, and they would watch that there are deals over nuclear warheads, and always images of mushroom clouds wiping out the world. But then they’d go off and watch John Wayne and Mary Poppins have this cinema! [laughter]


It was all relatively, the culture itself was optimistic. Yet today that’s not the case. Today the culture is either this sterile bland pop music, or the Hollywood Machine, which is just relentlessly pessimistic! All of these superhero movies where cities and nations are being wiped out! All of them are like that, you know.


And then we just look at the Joker movie everybody’s talking about. Everything’s rundown and grotty. And so the culture itself is full of doom and gloom in a way that it didn’t used to be.


Henrik: Yeah.


Morgs: There isn’t really an optimistic side to it.


Henrik: Yeah, that’s right. And at the same time, you know, we do have, of course, a lot of material success and stuff. But then you realize it’s not about that either.


And in this case it’s about inventing a plight, right? There’s so many things that various groups do talk about and what should be the primary focus of the culture, like, let’s say demographics, or like low birth rates. These are the disastrous things! Or open borders, or that the globalists are trying to eradicate nations and individual cultures, definitely the West! But all around the world essentially.


And those things should be at the forefront of discussions we should have about how we’re losing control, we’re losing free speech, we can’t say anything anymore! No dissent is allowed. But then this comes along and kind of hijacks the attention of all these other things that’s happening, and this is at the forefront. It’s very bizarre!



Morgs: It’s bizarre, because there is actually a serious discussion to be had about the nature of this technological, globalist, materialistic, society. And, you know, you’ve got to go back to the early nineteen hundred’s to people like Heidegger and Spengler, who are now, of course, very unpopular thinkers. And then you had some others as well. But the general thing was to have people say:


Oh wait a minute! Where is all of this going to lead? What effect is all of us having on the lived life of people?


And they were never taken seriously, because there was too much money involved, and you end up where we are now. So the discussion we should have is one of:


Do we really want to live like this?


Even with all of the technology that we have, nobody is saying we have to smash the whole machine to pieces, but at least sort of renegotiate how we actually live in it, you know what I mean?


Henrik: Yeah, because there are limits to growth. I mean, this is like the false dichotomy of the Left-Right, the Conservative-Liberal kind of thing that’s going on. Where the Conservatives are like, that’s ridiculous! Yeah economic growth, bringing them all in and convert them to, you know, the Westerners, right? And we’ll economically will do great, kind of thing. They’re trying to shut down our economy!


But it’s like, I’m sorry, but well I’m not sorry, but it’s not going to work forever. This is not gonna function! We are already at the precipice of this, you know, at the height of this population explosion. And at some point either we take charge of this and start to direct things and decide [25:01] where we go, or nature is going to do that for us, right? And at that point if we have a colony collapse, or some kind of disaster, or civil unrest, or something, it’ll be one of the biggest die-offs, I guess that we’ve ever seen in human history! That’s what awaiting us if we just continue on the path that we are on right now.



Morgs: Yeah. And this sort of hands of the zeitgeist, and it had sort of manifests itself in pop culture.


I mean, the last Godzilla movie fascinated me about what it was actually saying, in effect, it was where the old gods from the mother earth, Godzilla and then the other monsters as well, had come back to stamp out humans, which was like a virus infecting the planet and destroying nature. And so the old monsters had come back to protect the planet.


Now it’s very interesting that all of this stuff is sort of in the general culture, it’s all in the backs of people’s minds. And I would say, why don’t we just stop for a moment and ask ourselves what this is all for? Well, what is its purpose? What is the purpose of the global economy? And the conservatives, as you say, will say it’s for goods and services. But are they really that important to have? Are they more important than the actual quality of life?


Because it’s, again, it’s the early 20th century thinkers who are reactionaries and on the right — I think was Rene Gounon [sp] would talk about the quantification of the world, where everything became a quantity to be consumed and it overruled the actual quality of life.


And so the idea of sitting in a pod eating a maggot burger is where that all leads! Because if you’ve got the best iPhone and the flat-screen TV, you’re a success, you’ve made it, and it’s all worth it for that.



Henrik: Absolutely! I mean, look at the matrix, right? I mean, that’s really what awaits us if this continues, to work out those kinks that might follow. I mean, we do have a establishment that not only want to push us towards utilitarianism, because they want to incentivise essentially, having as many people around as possible, or something. Or for the sake of, let’s say demographically replace Westerners, or something like that, that’s why just cram em all in megacities and stuff like that!


But to deal with the potential fallout of some people being, if your biological entity might be unhappy, if you’re spending the majority of your life in a small pod. So the best way around that is just to jack you into a digital world, a virtual space, where you can run around! You can do whatever you want, you can be whoever you want, no restrictions, no limitations! It will be all clean and nice, if that’s what you want.


It could be a forever beach hut down in Bahamas, or something, right? And eventually we’ll be fed like a single-cell protein, or as you say, maggots, or something like that. I mean, that’s the future we’re looking at right now!


Morgs: Yeah. I mean, with the iPhone they’re already halfway there. Because it’s not as sophisticated as the matrix sort of jacking you in.


But I saw an interesting meme last week. Where it showed you all of these people on the London Underground, and one of the photos, they all had their iPhones and then they’ve done that again but they Photoshopped out the iPhones so they were just looking at their hands. And it was as if they were just staring, they were all atomized! Nobody was looking at anybody else, on one was talking to anybody else! And when you remove their phone they’re all just looking down into their hands. And it’s all just this emptiness internalized.


So they’re actually quite far with the Matrix scenario. It’s just it’s in the form of the iPhone that you walk around with, in which your eyes are glued to all the time, rather than having the plug going in the back of your head


Henrik: Yeah. And all this will be very subtle. The steps will be very gradual in a sense that it won’t be a dramatic shift towards that. I mean, I think they’ll probably go towards like augmented reality initially first. You know, projections onto things, or something that interfaces with your neural, with your visuals, you know, your eyes essentially. Where you see certain things, there’s like overlays on reality, rights and eventually you start, well remove the unpleasant things, or whatever you don’t want to see, and it becomes a very selective little experience. It’s all ultimately let’s [30:01] face it, it’s escape from reality, because we all know that right now reality sucks! And no one likes where this is going. Everyone sees that quality is going down the drain. Yeah go ahead



Morgs: It’s also interesting that what we’re talking about now which is solely the commodification of humanity, this is the kind of criticism Extinction Rebellion could be leveling at the elites, and at the system.


Henrik: Yes


Morgs: Well they’re not. They’re doing the opposite! They’re demanding that the system has more power, and more control, to save the world from an abstract problem. Whereas we, let’s say nationalists, or people on the dissident right, should be looking at this is that we’re interested in how this is affecting the people, more than the climate. How is the system, how is this machine actually dealing with people? And it’s dealing with us like the maggots!


I did a video on that called “Deep Fried Human Nuggets”, where essentially they’re breeding a new kind of person.


And what you’ll end up with is where you’re just, because you can apply this to the way they have done it on chickens. There are mass chicken batteries, and the you get some chickens which are specially bred for the breast, and then others which are specially bred for the legs. And the one that’s bred for the breast can’t walk, because they’re not interested in the legs. And it just lies, it spends it’s life lying hooked up with a tube in its mouth which is feeding it. And it’s disgusting! You can see that optimal production would just be this ball of meat, with a mouth and an anus {laughing]. And think of like when humans are on [word unclear].


Henrik: Yeah! I mean, yeah. What is it all for, right? Well, what’s the purpose of this thing? What is the experiences that we do want? And right now there’s no — well there are some people that do have direction and they know what they’re doing, they want to try to mold and shape the world in their image. They’re getting us there. This is, all this stuff that’s happening right now is a “success story” as far as they’re concerned, so far.


But there, of course, are ruminations of discontent underneath the surface, that’s bubbling up. And that’s why they’re so heavily trying to block, and censor, and shut people’s ability down to communicate these dangerous ideas that are poking holes and in this new global utopia that they’re building for us.


Morgs: And I mean, especially when you tackle the machine in these ways it does bypass a lot of the alarm systems as well. Essentially, it’s arguing from the Left. This is the job that the Left have left open to people on the Right, to say:


Well actually, we think living a genuine, quality, life is more important than having all of these consumer goods.


There should be a left-wing, but they have left that out. They’re become obsessed with the power. And they have become sort of locked in the system and in the grid themselves. And so there’s a big opening for dissident, more traditional minded people on the right, nationalists, to say:


Well, it’s not so much about hating other groups, it’s just that we want to have a genuine sense of being in community in our own country! And it’s gonna be outside of this sort of controlled grid of global capital and technology.



Henrik: Yeah I absolutely, … This is a very obviously important and interesting philosophical discussion to have. And it’s the one that we need to have more often. And I do want to continue with this. There was just one thing I wanted to go back to before we lose kind of the Extinction Rebellion and some of the things that they’re promoting here. Because we’ve heard in recent years, it’s really the recent few months now, that this has picked up about how dangerous people who are pro-nationalism are. It’s a very intense pressure, if you will, from the mainstream media, and kind of the culture of overall.



But I heard something, one of the guys at the Extinction Rebellion was talking about, speaking about, violence and things like that. Let’s play this, and I’m gonna get your take on this, because we always hear, of course, that people who object this kind of stuff, are the dangerous violent ones. But listen to this here:


We are going to force the governments to act! And if we don’t, if they don’t, we will bring them down and create a democracy fit for purpose! And yes! Some may die in the process. And yes! Some may die in the process.


Imagine if a nationalist would have said that, Morgoth.


Morgs: Yeah, they’d be destroyed! [35:01] There’d be an armed police force and helicopters! You’d be gone, you’d be gone off the face of the earth in no time at all!


Henrik: Yeah!


Morgs: It’s fascinating, it’s unbelievable!


I mean, for much, much less than saying something like that. I did a video, just somebody who called out the local labor councilors on issues relating to child grooming and sex trafficking, in town in the North called Sunland. And he went to jail for 21 months, because he stood in the middle of the town and had a big rant against who was responsible! And the carted him off to jail for 21 months!


And here you have like a well-spoken man, and very middle-class, and quite polished, talking about yeah, people will die. It’s unbelievable!


Henrik: Yeah, we’re gonna hold you off from the halls of power, and yeah, some people will have to die. But it’s fine, you know, because we gotta break some eggs in this wonderful omelet we’re making here! But of course, as you say, this is being allowed. This is being permitted, because this group is in the hands of the (((globalists))).


They are being used as a tool by them, because it’s effective to try to get people to, I guess to give the appearance that it’s some kind of grassroots support for us handing over power and influence into fewer and fewer hands.


Well, is there something else that you’ve been looking at, when it comes to like the Extinction Rebellion, of how they’re being used, or something like that, that’s worth to squeeze in here, in the first segment, before we take a break in a few minutes?


Morgs: Just one thing I would touch on, is that by and large, as this sort of controlled opposition psychological operation, it’s been a bit of a failure. It has become a bit of a joke. But we’ve reached a stage, I mean we’re probably going to go into Brexit, where the elite don’t really care whether you believe it, or not. Because you’ve got no choice in the matter. So you can tweet, and you can make videos laughing at Extinction Rebellion, but they don’t care! They’re just gonna run with the narrative anyway, because there’s nothing you can do about it.


I mean, in the past it used to be much more sophisticated. Occupy Wall Street and these kinds of groups, that you can actually debate. I think that was actually legit, but got co-opted. But whatever the case may be, the people seem to take them more seriously. Whereas we’ve reached a stage now where the elite say:


Yeah, okay, it looks ridiculous but, you know, we don’t care, because there’s nothing you can do about it!


Henrik: Yeah and it needs to be pointed out too, for maybe newcomers, newly red-pilled people — whatever you want to call it — but people are starting to question the lies and the garbage that is being shoved down our throats, that much of this, which the Extinction Rebellion bases their hysteria around, has been debunked.


I mean, Climategate back in 2010. All this was centered around Britain at the time. East Anglia University was it, the Climate Research Unit, the CRU. A lot of the numbers that the IPCC gathered actually came from CRU. And this 1.5 degrees which is the latest report that the IPCC released, is the whole basis of this:


Oh my god we only have 12 years!


Because if it’s an increase by 1.5 percent, it’s all gonna, you know, we’re all gonna die, we’re all gonna die in some major heat wave, or whatever, you know, some horrible fire! But much of the individual measurements that at CRU did was released in these leaked emails, that they had been placed in very shady places, like parking lots, had been placed in things about which were artificially warmed by human construction, denser areas. They have been fiddling with the numbers and stuff.


I mean, this is 2010, I can’t remember all the details from it. But Tim Ball, a lot of other people that covered this extensively back then. And it should have been an issue which was like laid to rest. And it felt at the time, Morgoth, that some of these things did die. That Al Gore was at the forefront at that time, and a lot of him and his work, kind of felt like he was discredited. But now it’s brought back again, because people don’t have that long-term memory. They can’t even remember this, right?


Morgs: Yeah. I mean, according Al Gore, New York should be under war are now! Also, he’s just bought up a beachfront property in San Francisco last year, or something. A really sort of slick mansion on the beach! [laughter] And he, of all people, knows that well we should be underwater, but it didn’t happen.


But it is, yeah, it is something that they roll out. This time it’s kind of like Extinction Rebellion is for the age of social justice, rather than sort of tackling [40:01] the more thoughtful, sits there and considers the facts and the science. That didn’t work, so in the age of the social justice warrior, we will retell the same narrative and do it again for people, these emotionally distraught Millennials. And you can see that exactly what they’ve done.


Henrik: Yeah. There’s so many things on a psychological level which are clever and weaved into this, because people do need a purpose, they need to feel good about something that they’re doing, and stuff. And so these groups, and these kinds of stunts, or whatever you want to call it, pop up on a regular basis really, to kind of allow people to flood, and put their discontent into that, their attention, their focus.


And again, yes there is a very real and important aspect of environmentalism weaved into that, but as you said, before, eloquently it’s a deflection, actually, away from the real kind of issues. And what’s happening with all the chemicals, and even human medication being dumped in the water supply. And, you know, things that are altering us, that are leading to other weird weird side effects. None of that is being discussed. It’s essentially just pay more money and hand over power, that’s all that it is now, at this point!


Morgs: The male suicide epidemic across the West, is another symptom of the modern world. And whether, or not this is all to do, it’s not to do with the climate, but it is to do with the way we actually live in the modern world, which is depressing a lot of men. And, of course, this doesn’t come in at the equation at all. In fact, you ended up living in a pod and eating a maggot burger, and watch virtual reality porn on your flat-screen TV, and that’s your lot, is not going to help with that whatsoever.


But in actual real problems which people are faced with, they don’t help at all. It’s to further empower the elite to restrict how people live, and actually get us into the pods.


Henrik: Yes. And you pointed out in that article too. So a couple of interesting facts, if we can squeeze in here before we take a short break. But they were arguing for people to stop flying, don’t travel, stop eating meat, or beef specifically, I think it was as well. Was there anything else they added on to that list of what we plebs need to do?


Morgs: What she said was that they will make it so that driving, and flying, and eating beef, will be made socially taboo in the same way that smoking was.


Henrik: That is right.



Morgs: So that this indirect pressure, and, of course, in the end smoking just became completely banned everywhere! And eventually with vaping it was kind of replaced entirely. I’m not saying that’s a bad thing. I used to smoke and I didn’t do it anymore.


But the point is you can, they can socially engineer things at that macro level, to change people’s behaviors and away from say eating beef. I mean, a couple of people pointed out that eating beef actually is genuinely terrible for the environment.


And yeah, so it gets back to that point. Again, is it natural that four billion people on earth have access to steaks, because all of our cattle has to be reared in, let’s say the Amazon or wherever. There’s definitely real deep discussions to be had on this subject. Should should beef be a luxury item? There’s a good case to be made for sayin yeah, it should. But then we can substitute it with like fish, or something like that. But this is not really what Extinction Rebellion are arguing for, at all.


Henrik: No, it’s you shut up, and you eat the maggots now! You get the bugs! And, you know, we at the top will do everything as usual, in fact, we get more luxury. We get more control, more money, more resources, and everything else!


No, it’s a total fraud! A total sham! If they were sincere about this they wouldn’t weave in migration into this, as a kind of, you know, I’ve seen the links, climate migration, we have to accept immigrants now, because of, you know, there’s climate change in other areas. And therefore bringing people millions of people each year into kind of a Western world lifestyle is somehow going to aid to this process?


I think it’s, at the end of the day, it’s, … I think one of (((their))) primary goals is demographic replacement! And that’s part of their control agenda, right? Destroy those pesky Europeans that might do some weird kind of unexpected things when it comes to protesting against their subversion, I guess their submission, right.


And so they might kind of, there’s a couple examples, let’s put it that way, historically, that have given them pause. And (((they))) think:


Well, yeah, if we can destroy national homogeneity, if we can destroy the ethnic makeup, the glue that makes up these various nations, globalism is going to be so much easier!


Another plus side is that can replace Europeans specifically! Kind of get they them out of the picture. And I think that’s related to what you mentioned before, that appreciation for freedom, liberty, and that kind of thing, is among the highest I think among Europeans overall.


So we’re a we’re an obstacle in the way towards globalism


Morgs: I would also just point out as well, that what we see emerging from “social justice” which is “Whiteness studies”, which is where Europeans are sort of, they will call the whole system “Whiteness”, and say “Whiteness” is something that has to be abolished. That ties in very nicely with this new climate agenda, because it’s the same system that they’re talking about.



Henrik: A few of those kinds of headlines which I was thinking about, like climate refugees, population displacement, building a trade union, civil society, Guardian again. Orwellian anti-refugee system hints at what’s to come for climate refugees. Everyone has the right to move safely and legally.



CNN: Climate change to create hundred and forty three million migrants. World Bank says:


You’re ready for tens of millions of climate refugees.


Right? So we’ve seen these kinds of headlines being pushed in the mainstream for some time time now, but no one questions bringing millions of people into Western lifestyle would be the worst thing for the environment, in fact.

Morgs: Yeah, exactly. Yeah. And it’s all one humanity, one mass, one big blob, and it will need one government to control it!


Henrik: That’s right! Oversee everything and it’s, I mean, it’s problem, reaction, solution, right? You create problems, you offer, you get outrage, and then you offer the solution. Which is again:


We’ll take care of you! Just hand over more control to us, and we’ll make sure it’s right!


It’s all very clever! It’s all in the books. But let’s take a break here Morgoth, and then we’ll dive into much more here in part two. But plug some of your stuff then. Let us know where people need to go, follow your blog, subscribe to your YouTube, Twitter, etc.


Morgs: Morgoth’s Review on all of me platforms, on YouTube, BitChute, which is becoming more of an important site.


Henrik: That is right. I do have to remember mentioning that, thank you for bringing that up, by the way.


Morgs: BitChute and Morgoth’s Review on blogspot as well is easy to find as well.



Henrik: Now does a search work on BitChute? Let’s see. I just know that sometimes it’s not the best on there


Morgs: If you type it in from Google, or your search browser.



Henrik: Yeah, I did find it there. Yeah, Morgoth’s Review. Yeah, doing good on subs over there too, so that’s great.


Morgs: I also do the occasional video. All of my live streams are probably gonna go on to BitChute. And then, from time to time, I do a sort of monologue, which is a bit too hot for YouTube. That one in the corner there called “Cracks in the Goldberg” is an example of a too hot for YouTube video. Which I’ll do, just for BitChute to help BitChute along. And you really see the difference as well. They’re popular when they just go on exclusively on BitChute.


Henrik: Yes, it’s true. No, that’s great! I think I watched that one, that’s about a month old. I recognized the thumbnail. I thought that that was really good, as well. And I forget, I think it was a BitChute right away that I saw it. But yeah, some good stuff over there. So make sure you subscribe to Morgoth’s Review on be BitChute as well.


But guys we’ll take a short break here. We’ll be back in part two. More with Morgoth’s Review coming up. Stay tuned and see you on the other side.



Alright ladies and gentlemen, we’re gonna continue in part two with Morgoth’s Review. Definitely make sure that you tune in. We’re going to continue to talk about Brexit, demographic situation, and new census that’s coming out in the UK next year. That’s gonna be very revealing in terms of the demographic transformation of the UK.



We’re gonna talk about the increase in knife crime, acid attacks. Of course, the kind of unholy alliance between the Left and Islam in the UK, is kind of beginning to tear a little bit at the seams. We will dive into detail about that and kind of discuss in a bit. What it will take to get people of English descent to realise what the establishment is doing to them, and what they actually what kind of future they’re going to create for their kids and their grandchildren.


Anyway a lot to get into. Definitely make sure you don’t miss it. Head on over to Red Ice Members com. Sign up for a membership with us, it’s the best way to support us and, of course, you get access to hundreds and hundreds of hours of good content. Interviews, weekend warrior, exclusive videos, bunch of stuff is in the members section for you, as well.

It’s only about the price of an expensive fancy cup of coffee per month. We have subscriptions from 3 months, all the way up to to years. And, of course, the longer sub you get, the cheaper that is per month as well. But check it out, Red Ice Members dot com! Great way of supporting us. We’ll see you guys after the break. Tons more coming up, so stay tuned, Red Ice dot TV, and Red Ice members dot com. See you after the break!









See Also:





PDF Notes

Version 1

* Total words = xxx
* Total images = xx
* Total A4 pages =


Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)






Version History


Version 5:


Version 4:


Version 3:


Version 2: Oct 13, 2019  — Added images.


Version 1: Oct 12, 2019  — Published post.

Posted in Britain, Communism, Extinction Rebellion, Freedom of Speech, Globalism, Henrik Palmgren, Hollywood, Jew World Order, Jewish Problem/Question, Jewish Supremacism, Media - BBC, Morgoths Review, Multiculturalism, Red Ice Radio, Red Ice Radio - Henrik, Thought Crime, Uncategorized, Western Civilization | Leave a comment

Patrick Grimm – Do You Get It Yet? – Mar 18, 2007



Patrick Grimm talks of how Whites’ obliviousness to how Orgjew has been systematically destroying our countries will not end well. The sheer sadism that jews are inflicting upon people in the Middle East, against the Palestinians, is a taste of what they will inflict upon us if we allow them to take total control over our societies. The solution to this immense problem that confronts us is to speak up, tell people your concerns — KATANA.





Patrick Grimm

Do You Get It Yet?




Mar 18, 2007




HERE is an article chronicling a criminal Jewish organization, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, this time its New England chapter, openly and unabashedly working to assist more illegal immigrants who are breaking into America. You still don’t get it yet? You still don’t see that the balkanization, the fragmentation and the dissolution of your nation is being orchestrated by one group and one group alone? It is the Jews, mostly Zionist Jews, who are sticking it to us.


Do you not yet understand that the Jews work better in a society that is not monocultural, but instead a stew of warring ethnicities more ripe for Hebrew control? Are you not yet capable of seeing the double standard and blatant hypocrisy of the international Zionist disease that is gripping America and indeed the entire Western world? I’m not mincing words here and I’m not going to disguise my ideas in pseudonyms about “liberals” and “secularists” when it is one group and only one group who is united in their desire to destroy us. Wake up! Wake up before it’s too late for all of us. Call me an alarmist if you want to. Call me an extremist, but as Barry Goldwater reminded us “Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.” He also told us that “Moderation in the defense of liberty is no virtue.” I won’t be a fence-sitter as American slides into the Jewish sewer right down that slippery slope that organized Jewry has planned for us.


Continue reading

Posted in America, Anti-Defamation League, Arabs, Jews, Jews - Hostile Elite, Patrick Grimm | Leave a comment