“Normal political debates use extremely few sources, debates are formed around language and presenting your enemy e.g. “Politician A supports this policy which shows they do not support these people” etc.

If your going to be Jew-Wise in public and be prepared to face a hostile media and conditioned public you need to know your sources, organisations, names, past quotes, activities, dates etc as on every-point you make you are going to be challenged.”
————–
Ideally, yes.

But practically speaking what you need is a passion for the cause, truth and a thick skin. The knowledge will come as you learn from experience.

“Dr Duke can do this very well as his career for the last 20+ years is studying and writing on these people.”
—————
I think it’s been more like, nearly, 40 years.

“He is an authority on them and can give around 100 examples during an argument fairly easily. If in a live interview/debate if he cannot remember a certain quote, name, group etc he can always make reference to his writings aka “see my book Jewish Supremacism where I document from Jews themselves that 95% of Russian communists were Jewish”.”
—————–
True enough. But you only become an authority by starting to become an authority.

“Jared Taylor and Richard Spencer have their own skills sets, decades of experience in their respective areas and have their own way of presenting themselves. Unlike Duke’s encyclopedia knowledge on Jewish activities Jared is unlikely to be well versed in this, his specialty is racial differences.”
—————-
That’s the problem I have with Jared Taylor.

Instead of talking about the root cause of why and who is destroying our countries he has chosen to focus on symptoms. If that was all he did, that would be kind of acceptable in terms of just doing his bit.

Jared Taylor, though, dismisses the role of organized jewry in our destruction! He waves it off as not being that significant. He doesn’t want Duke at Amren conferences, although he welcomes jews. Ther’s something seriously wrong there.

“Even then some would argue that too much focus on Jews is disengionous as it ignores the weakness in our societies’ behaviour (influenced by plutocratic/jewish media), alturism, misguided trust, short termism, having our moral values altered etc.”
—————-
It is not disingenuous to NAME the ENEMY. It is disingenuous to say that you shouldn’t name the enemy at every opportunity. The jews have exploited all of our traits in order to harm us. Those traits in a jew-free society would not be a problem in themselves. An honest person is weak against dishonest persons.

“If a person is attempting to be Jew-Wise in public but cannot reference quotes, past actions, names, organisations etc then what can happen is it falls into conjectures or accusations which they are not able to provide references to in the heat of the moment. If they cannot provide source/s to support their point as well as when replying to the other sides’ counter points then, in my opinion, we just fall into stereotypes which are pre-conditioned into the public.”
——————–
This is all true, but like anything else you need to learn how to walk before you run. If your knowledge is limited then only deal with issues that you can handle. If you find yourself thrown in the deep end then you will quickly have to learn to swim or else.

“Even then the thought process of the human mind is heavily inclined to the emotional than logical even when well sourced. The main propaganda for Jews, the ‘Holocaust’, does not manifest itself by people logically accepting that over 1 million can die in gas chambers with inward opening wooden doors, ovens burning bodies multiple times above their maximum potential but the emotional propaganda propagated through media, education and unfortunately partly mainstream patriotardism.”
——————

The “Holocaust” lie has been deeply programmed into peoples heads and may be the last domino to fall.

Yet, we don’t need to convince everyone of everything all at once. Undoing life-times of lies can be fairly easy, in my experience, if the person is interested in knowing the truth. The emotional people are like sheep and will follow their shepherds, the thinkers in their world. That’s who we need to mostly talk to, the thinkers in any group. And they are at all levels and positions in society, although rarely where you would expect them to be.

“I support the ever expanding movement/community of those presenting a structured expose. We can probably agree that the scholarly approach of the Occidental Observer offers one of the best structures to educate people on the negative impact of organised Jewish activities in relation to European Nations current demographic predicament.”
—————–
I agree. The Occidental Observer (TOO) is a great resource for that type of person. All the sites that talk about the JQ are also valuable. They all have short-comings, yet all contribute to making people aware of how organised jewry is our enemy.

“Your listing of primary and secondary sources of Jewish activities and community projects to transcribe videos (so they do not become lost when Youtube deletes them 1-2 years after being uploaded) is important as well so don’t take my disagreement as being opposed to research on organised Jewish politics.”
—————
Yes, we need to document everything in various formats, especially written.

I take your comments, whether they agree or disagree with my position, as being made in good faith and I welcome further discussion at our leisure.

“In closing I think that if people are to be consistently Jew Wise in public they need to be able to present sufficient sources and discredit counter arguments, such as what Duke did.”
————–
We can’t all be David Duke in terms of knowledge, and we don’t have to be.

Bring up the JQ issue with people and from the responses learn more about it. As time goes by you will become better at it and at the same time be doing your bit in helping yourself, family, country and humanity. That’s what Duke did.

Your comment reminds me of that saying, “Perfection is the enemy of the good”.

Forget about knowing all the answers about the JQ. Dive into it and then you will become good at responding to any challenges.

Thanks Ryan for your thoughtful comment.

Normal political debates use extremely few sources, debates are formed around language and presenting your enemy e.g. “Politician A supports this policy which shows they do not support these people” etc.

If your going to be Jew-Wise in public and be prepared to face a hostile media and conditioned public you need to know your sources, organisations, names, past quotes, activities, dates etc as on every-point you make you are going to be challenged.

Dr Duke can do this very well as his career for the last 20+ years is studying and writing on these people. He is an authority on them and can give around 100 examples during an argument fairly easily. If in a live interview/debate if he cannot remember a certain quote, name, group etc he can always make reference to his writings aka “see my book Jewish Supremacism where I document from Jews themselves that 95% of Russian communists were Jewish”.

Jared Taylor and Richard Spencer have their own skills sets, decades of experience in their respective areas and have their own way of presenting themselves. Unlike Duke’s encyclopedia knowledge on Jewish activities Jared is unlikely to be well versed in this, his specialty is racial differences.

Even then some would argue that too much focus on Jews is disengionous as it ignores the weakness in our societies’ behaviour (influenced by plutocratic/jewish media), alturism, misguided trust, short termism, having our moral values altered etc.

If a person is attempting to be Jew-Wise in public but cannot reference quotes, past actions, names, organisations etc then what can happen is it falls into conjectures or accusations which they are not able to provide references to in the heat of the moment. If they cannot provide source/s to support their point as well as when replying to the other sides’ counter points then, in my opinion, we just fall into stereotypes which are pre-conditioned into the public.

Even then the thought process of the human mind is heavily inclined to the emotional than logical even when well sourced. The main propaganda for Jews, the ‘Holocaust’, does not manifest itself by people logically accepting that over 1 million can die in gas chambers with inward opening wooden doors, ovens burning bodies multiple times above their maximum potential but the emotional propaganda propagated through media, education and unfortunately partly mainstream patriotardism.

I support the ever expanding movement/community of those presenting a structured expose. We can probably agree that the scholarly approach of the Occidental Observer offers one of the best structures to educate people on the negative impact of organised Jewish activities in relation to European Nations current demographic predicament. Your listing of primary and secondary sources of Jewish activities and community projects to transcribe videos (so they do not become lost when Youtube deletes them 1-2 years after being uploaded) is important as well so don’t take my disagreement as being opposed to research on organised Jewish politics.

In closing I think that if people are to be consistently Jew Wise in public they need to be able to present sufficient sources and discredit counter arguments, such as what Duke did.

“I think it’s important to have people taking differing positions.”
—————
From a practical point of view that can be important when you are still trying to figure things out. But once you have figured out who the real enemy is, it is wasteful of resources to continue to do so.
.
.

“David Duke has his position and way of influencing people, Jared Taylor has his, Richard Spencer has his etc.”
—————-
Duke names the enemy, organized jewry. Jared Taylor does his best to deflect attention away from the enemy and as such is suspect. Richard Spencer is a lightweight who also doesn’t like to name the enemy, as far as I’m aware.
.
.

“I believe there is little marginal gain in someone endorsing the same position, especially when said position is the most vilified position in the Western world.”
———–
That position, exposing organized jewry as the cause of our destruction, is the most vilified because it is over the target. Because it is true. So naturally it is severely attacked.

So contrary to being of “marginal gain”, it is the complete opposite. It is tremendously powerful to go from not knowing who the hell the enemy is, to knowing who is the enemy. Like having a blindfold removed.
.
.

“People change their position in gradual steps and many come by it in a different way. I see him as a useful stepping stone between the convoluted EDL (anti-Islam but anti-racist) and more genuine Pro-White viewpoints.”
———–
People can change gradually or in big steps depending on how coherent the explanation is for making a small or major change in viewpoint.
.
.

“I also think his implicit position on Zionism is more to do with his personal strategy of focusing on islamic extremism, demonstrating it’s incompatibility with Western values etc.”
————
I listened to that interview with Majority Rights again (especially the last 10 minutes) and it is apparent, assuming he is being honest (which I think is likely the case), that he is not jew-wise at all. He suspects that Liberty GB couldn’t get a bank account because of Saudi influence on the banking system! He says that jews have a big influence over the media, yet he doesn’t connect those dots to see that they control the political system as a consequence. He trots out the simplistic argument that jews couldn’t be behind the Muslim invasion because Muslims are anti-Semitic! I mean, this is all basic jew 101 stuff.

So how does he remain so clueless? He’s intelligent and involved in the politics of it all. Something is not adding up, here.
.
.

“It’s questionable but sadly as the majority of right wing people are willingly Zio loving patrio-tards then to get anywhere he has to ‘sell out’ a bit.”
—————–
See above. The majority of “right-wing” are zio-loving because the people they listen to don’t tell them the reality of jewish control over the system.

“I expect he wants to deal with issues in it’s own way and not battling historical associations.”
—————
See above. Again he appears to be clueless and doesn’t battle WW II issues, for example, because he accepts the court historian point of view.
.
.

“I think his persona and background lends itself to the position he has taken. Privately educated in Southern England, an adventurous professional career including a deep sea diver in the North Sea, cargo plane pilot in Africa and real estate developer in the Prague. He can mingle and adhere himself to southern tories and UKIP’ers on the borders of the ‘mainstream’ right.”
—————
So he should be a practical man who is willing to accept reality. That reality is jewish control over our societies is THE CAUSE behind the third world invasion of White countries.
.
.

“The speech he gave at the Swinton club is basically the same type of speech you would expect at the London Forum just without reference to Jews here, Jews there, Jewish hypocrisy etc. In content there is not much different.”
—————-
Not naming the enemy, organized jewry, for the third world invasion, etc., is like not declaring that the cause of malaria is the mosquito and being content to blame it on “bad air”, or something equally vague.

I hope that Paul Weston is sincere and that his lack of jew awareness is simply a matter of him lacking knowledge on the subject. Perhaps jew to an aversion to delving into this matter because of being exposed throughout his life to poisonous jewish propaganda that makes him shudder at any anti-jew thoughts.

I like what Paul Weston has to say, except that he leaves out the jewish elephant, crushing every White country in the world into racial oblivion, either because he is; ignorant, fearful, traitorous, or some blend of those.

I recommend that he and others listen to or read the recent Alex Jones vs David Duke interview to get a better understanding of what’s going on.

Thank you Ryan for the civil conversation.

I think it’s important to have people taking differing positions. David Duke has his position and way of influencing people, Jared Taylor has his, Richard Spencer has his etc. I believe there is little marginal gain in someone endorsing the same position, especially when said position is the most vilified position in the Western world.

People change their position in gradual steps and many come by it in a different way. I see him as a useful stepping stone between the convoluted EDL (anti-Islam but anti-racist) and more genuine Pro-White viewpoints.

I also think his implicit position on Zionism is more to do with his personal strategy of focusing on islamic extremism, demonstrating it’s incompatibility with Western values etc. It’s questionable but sadly as the majority of right wing people are willingly Zio loving patrio-tards then to get anywhere he has to ‘sell out’ a bit. I expect he wants to deal with issues in it’s own way and not battling historical associations.

I think his persona and background lends itself to the position he has taken. Privately educated in Southern England, an adventurous professional career including a deep sea diver in the North Sea, cargo plane pilot in Africa and real estate developer in the Prague. He can mingle and adhere himself to southern tories and UKIP’ers on the borders of the ‘mainstream’ right.

The speech he gave at the Swinton club is basically the same type of speech you would expect at the London Forum just without reference to Jews here, Jews there, Jewish hypocrisy etc. In content there is not much different.

I did listen to that podcast when it first came out and recall not being convinced by Weston’s deflection of the JQ. I’ll need to re-listen to it to comment with any detail.

That said, wouldn’t you call him Zio friendly? He doesn’t denounce Israel and in fact panders to them.

We need to name the enemy, organized jewry.

People who don’t, are wittingly or unwittingly aiding and abetting the enemy that is out to destroy us.

It’s as hard as that.