Mike Baillie – New Light on the Black Death – two reviews

There is an inherent tendency to view historical events in the light of prevailing theories. It is therefore unsurprising that, with the ‘germ theory’ firmly entrenched in medical establishment thinking, the ‘Black Death’ continues to be reported as an ‘infectious disease’ caused by bacteria, which, according to the WHO fact sheet, are,

“…usually found in small mammals and their fleas.”

The archaeological evidence has not yet persuaded the medical establishment to alter their obviously incorrect theory. [ →British archaeologist, Barney Sloane, who has claimed that the ‘Black Death’ could not have been transmitted by rats; as reported in an August 2011 article entitled Can We Stop Blaming Rats for the Black Death. The article refers to archaeological work that has been conducted in London and states that,

“…excavations in the city have turned up little evidence of a massive rat die-off coinciding with the plague.”]

It sometimes requires a scientist from an entirely different scientific discipline to view evidence from a new perspective, and thereby produce a more compelling explanation for that evidence. In this instance, a new hypothesis about the likely causes of the Black Death has been developed by a dendrochronologist, a scientist who studies tree-rings to identify different growth patterns.
The dendrochronologist in this instance is Professor Mike Baillie, whose study of tree-ring data of the 14th century led him to discover some interesting tree growth patterns, and to undertake further investigations that included the study of ice-core data, as well as contemporary 14th century accounts of the event. Professor Baillie has recorded the results of his research and the basis for his hypothesis in his book entitled New Light on the Black Death, in which he includes extracts from some contemporary documents. One of the extracts he quotes includes the statement that,

“There have been masses of dead fish, animals and other things along the sea shore and in many places trees covered in dust …. and all these things seem to have come from the great corruption of the air and earth.”

Contemporary writers were sufficiently observant to be aware of, and write about, ‘masses of dead fish, animals and other things along the sea shore’, as well as ‘trees covered in dust’. They would, therefore, also have been sufficiently observant to have noticed, and specifically written about, masses of dead rats or even gerbils, had there been any to observe. Such reports are conspicuous by their absence; a situation that supports the archaeological findings.

An even more significant aspect of the quoted extract is the reference to ‘the great corruption of the air and earth’. In addition to these documents, Professor Baillie obtained evidence from his examination of tree rings that led to his statement that,

“The Black Death sits in a clear environmental trough visible in smoothed tree ring chronologies from around the world.”

The corruption of the atmosphere certainly must have been extremely severe to have been able to generate a ‘clear environmental trough’; it was sufficiently severe to have been able to cause death from respiratory problems; as Professor Baillie states,

“The most likely mechanism would be through affecting their respiration system in some catastrophic way. After all, writer after writer on the Black Death makes the point that it is the ‘pulmonary’ form of the disease that was the dominant killer.”

It is clear therefore that ‘something’ must have occurred to have caused such a severe corruption of the atmosphere over a large portion of the world. One interesting and undisputed fact is that a major earthquake erupted in Europe on 25th January 1348. Professor Baillie reveals however, that this was not a singular event, but part of a series of earthquakes that occurred during the mid-14th century, both before and after the January earthquake.

Another interesting piece of the puzzle is that an unusually high level of ammonium has been discovered from the examination of ice core data. A higher than normal level of ammonium has also been discovered in ice cores that have been dated to periods in which other epidemics of ‘plague’ occurred. The result of his investigation of the evidence led Professor Baillie to conclude that,

“There really is enough information about comets, earthquakes and ammonium to permit the quite serious suggestion that the Black Death was due to an impact by comet debris on 25th January 1348 as witnessed by the major earthquake on that day.”Investigations and analysis of the toxic chemicals found within comets and comet debris have produced further supportive evidence for this conclusion; Professor Baillie explains,

“Apart from ammonium, it is now known that a range of unpleasant, toxic and evil-smelling chemicals, including hydrogen sulphide and carbon disulphide, have been detected in recent comets.”

The presence of ‘evil-smelling chemicals’ would certainly explain the documented reports about the ‘corruption of the atmosphere’; their toxicity also explains how these chemicals would have caused severe respiration problems and rapid death from asphyxiation for those people in close proximity to the dense atmospheric poisoning.

Herbert Shelton provides further documentary evidence of 14th century earthquakes and the subsequent pollution of the atmosphere, in his 1967 article entitled Pestilence and Plagues that states,

“Hecker’s Epidemics of the Middle Ages says of the Plague that ‘mighty revolutions in the organism of the earth, of which we have credible information, had preceded it. From China to the Atlantic the foundations of the earth were shaken, throughout Asia and Europe the atmosphere was in commotion, and endangered by its baneful influence, both vegetable and animal life’.”
In the same article, Herbert Shelton also quotes from Berdoe’s Origins and Growth of the Healing Art that provides further information about the prevailing conditions,

“In 1337, four millions of people perished by famine in China in the neighbourhood of Kiang alone. Floods, famine and earthquakes were frequent, both in Asia and Europe. In Cyprus a pestiferous wind spread a poisonous odor before an earthquake shook the island to its foundations, and many of the inhabitants fell down suddenly and expired in dreadful agonies after inhaling the noxious gases. German chemists state that a thick stinking mist advanced from the East and spread over Italy in thousands of places, and vast chasms opened in the earth which exhaled the most noxious vapors.”

These conditions can be explained by comets, comet debris and earthquakes; they cannot be explained by rat fleas ‘infected’ with disease-causing bacteria.

Another outbreak of ‘plague’ occurred in England during the 17th century. Although it is reported to have been minor by comparison to the Black Death, some fascinating details have been found from contemporary writings, including those of notable authors Daniel Defoe and Samuel Pepys, both of whom lived during the period in which it occurred.

The following extract from The Diary of Samuel Pepys, dated 24th December 1664, states that he,
“…saw the Comet, which is now, whether worn away or no I know not, but appears not with a tail, but only is larger and duller than any other star…”

The episode of ‘plague’ that affected England, and especially London, occurred in June 1665, and therefore only a few months after the sighting of the comet.

This is also described by Daniel Defoe, who, in his novel entitled A Journal of the Plague Year, wrote that,“In the first place, a blazing Star, or Comet, appeared for several months before the Plague…”

The evidence from contemporary records as well as tree-ring and ice core data demonstrates the existence of a ‘corrupted atmosphere’ during the 14th century. The earthquakes and impact of comet debris provide credible explanations for that corrupted atmosphere and for its ability to have permeated a significant portion of the planet. The toxic substances known to be associated with comets and comet debris provide an extremely compelling explanation for the rapid onset of severe respiratory problems, asphyxiation and death.

The medical establishment theory about fleas infected with bacteria that were spread by small animals to humans is entirely unsupported by the evidence; the theory that the Black Death, or any other epidemic of ‘plague’ can be caused by a bacterium is shown to be fatally flawed.

from the book What Really Makes You Ill?: Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong
***

(…)According to Baillie, illness and death resulted from poisoned water and air as the comet flew overhead.

But the symptoms—especially bruise-like blotches on the skin and high fatality rate—indicate radiation poisoning★, probably rendered even more deadly by dust and ammonia-like compounds in the atmosphere. Imagine a large comet passing near the earth, crackling with intense electrical arcing, pelting the earth with X-rays and casting off fragments that fall to the earth and spew up toxic clouds of dust, followed immediately by horrible death, sometimes wiping out whole towns. This is not the kind of catastrophe that we can blame on microbes.

Perhaps our solar system is calming down—mankind has not seen such violent phenomena for centuries. But smaller electrical disturbances, ones that can’t be seen, are still likely to promote outbreaks, albeit less disastrous. And if radiation poisoning—whether ionizing or nonionizing—provokes disease, there are obvious cofactors. Poisons in air, water, and food; toxins from insect bites; deadly fungi on grains; exposure to filth; malnutrition; and starvation; as well as fear and despair—we don’t need to resort to the notion of contagion to explain outbreaks of disease.

★The current explanation for the correlation of comets and disease is that of “panspermia.” We now know that outer space is populated by clouds of microorganisms, and the theory holds that comets are watery bodies—dirty snowballs—that rain new microscopic forms on the earth, to which humans and animals have no immunity.¹

However, recent evidence indicates little if any water on comets. Rather, they are asteroids that have an elliptical orbit and become charged electrically as they approach the sun, an exchange that creates the comet’s bright coma and tail. Their surfaces exhibit the kind of features that happen with intense electrical arcing, like craters and cliffs; bright or shiny spots on otherwise barren rocky surfaces indicate areas that are electrically charged. Comets contain mineral alloys requiring temperatures in the thousands of degrees, and they have sufficient energy to emit extreme UV light and even powerful X-rays. Moreover, as comets approach the sun, they can provoke high-energy discharges and flare-ups of solar plasma, which reach out to the comet.²

Thus, comets can create electrical disturbances in the atmosphere even more powerful than those created by man-made electrification*— and this radiation includes demonstrably dangerous ionizing radiation. No wonder the ancients were afraid of comets!

*See The Invisible Rainbow by Arthur Firstenberg. Firstenberg chronicles the history of electricity in the United States and throughout the world, and the outbreaks of illness that accompanied each step toward greater electrification.

¹“Panspermia and the Origin of Life on Earth,” https://www.panspermia-theory.com/.
² Wal Thornhill, “Comets Impact Cosmology,” July 20, 2004, https://www.holoscience.com/wp/comets-impact-cosmology/;
Wallace Thornhill and David Talbott, “The Electric Comet,” 2006, https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/electric_universe/esp_electricuniverse17.htm.

From The Contagion Myth by Thomas S. Cowan, MD, and Sally Fallon Morello

Anyway any electromagnetic field generated by modern technology has some, sometimes strong influence on organic life. Suggested reading:

The INVISIBLE RAINBOW A History of Electricity and Life by Arthur Firstenberg

DIRTY ELECTRICITY ELECTRIFICATION AND THE DISEASES OF CIVILIZATION
by SAMUEL MILHAM, MD, MPH

Radiation Nation by Daniel T. DeBaun Ryan P. DeBaun

OVERPOWERED What Science Tells Us about the Dangers of Cell Phones and Other WiFi-Age Devices Martin Blank, PhD

HIDDEN DANGERS 5G
How governments, telecom and electric power utilities suppress the truth about the known hazards of electro-magnetic field (EMF) radiation By Captain Jerry G. Flynn
(Retired Electronic Warfare Specialist)

EMF*D … By Dr Mercola

THE 5G THEORY from Mr Perloff book:

Wuhan was China’s rollout city for 5G, the 5th generation mobile network that, unlike previous wireless networks, will operate through millions of “small cells” that transmit over short distances. Another major hypothesis circulating in alternative media has been that 5G was the primary cause of the COVID-19 pandemic. YouTube has systematically deleted videos making this assertion. From one perspective, this may validate the videos, given YouTube’s record of draconian censorship. On the other hand, there are responsible people in alternative media who argue against, or at least question, a 5G role. For example, activist and blogger Derrick Broze, an opponent of 5G, was interviewed on the Corbett Report. Broze did not see 5G as causing the COVID-19 crisis; he pointed out, for example, that he had lived in Houston, an America rollout city for 5G, and no one started having COVID-19 when 5G began there.1 (However, as 5G operates at widely varying frequencies, and since the initial U.S. rollout was “soft,” one could question if this was done so there would be no public alarm and the “frog could be boiled.”)

Also, I received an email in April 2020 from 5G Crisis, a leading anti-5G activism website which I subscribe to. While affirming that harm from EMF (electromagnetic field) waves is undeniably well-documented, they asked subscribers to refrain from saying 5G was causing the pandemic— that there was no hard, evidence-based science for this, and that the assertion was causing ridicule of 5G opponents, making their work harder.

Nevertheless, there are responsible scholars who see a possible correlation between COVID and 5G. In February 2020, Dr. Ronald Kostoff of the Georgia Institute of Technology published a 1086-page paper on EMF dangers, The Largest Unethical Medical Experiment in Human History? Appendix 5—starting on page 648—is “Potential Impact of Wireless Radiation Exposure on the Opioid Crisis and the Coronavirus Pandemic.” He questions if EMFs contributed to the pandemic by weakening the immune system.

Magda Havas, PhD, did a study showing that, in U.S. states with 5G, both the infection and death rates for COVID-19 were about double that of states without 5G.3 Others who see a 5G link with COVID-19 include Thomas Cowan, MD, and Robert O. Young, PhD, both of whom YouTube has heavily censored. Cowan calls attention to the work of Arthur Firstenberg, whose book The Invisible Rainbow points out that past pandemics—in 1889 (Russian Flu), 1918 (Spanish Flu), 1957 (Asian Flu), and 1968 (Hong Kong Flu) — each corresponded with new electric/electromagnetic rollouts: electric power lines, radio, radar and satellites. He believes that the impact of these on the ionosphere—the Earth’s electrical envelope—had negative ramifications for human health. Our nervous systems are, after all, largely electrical; and our bodies themselves, at the most basic level, consist of electrons, protons and neutrons. Firstenberg’s book is well-researched and deserves a hearing. If he’s right, then 5G’s introduction, like previous rollouts, might indeed play a role in the current pandemic.

Shigeaki Hakusui, president of the Harmonix Corporation, wrote an article in 2001 on wireless radiation which states: “At the millimeter wave frequency of 60 GHz, the absorption is very high, with 98 percent of the transmitted energy absorbed by atmospheric oxygen.”4

5G operates at frequencies as low as 450 megahertz, but can go to well above 60 gigahertz.5 (1 gigahertz is a thousand times stronger than 1 megahertz.) One of the strangest things about the Wuhan outbreak: residents, who appeared healthy and were engaged in routine activities, were photographed suddenly dropping dead. This has led some to ask if they were unable to process oxygen due to directed electromagnetic blasts from Wuhan’s network of approximately 10,000 5G antennas. As Scientists for Wired Technology has noted:

The Department of Defense has developed a RF-EMR crowd-control weapon called the Active Denial System (ADS). The ADS works by firing a high-powered beam of 95 GHz waves at people—that is, a millimeter wavelength weapon—similar to millimeter waves being used for new 5G installations.6

During a Congressional hearing, representatives from the telecommunications industry admitted to Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal that no safety testing has ever been done on 5G. The exchange went viral and can be watched at (for example) “US Senator Blumenthal Raises Concerns on 5G Wireless Technology Health Risks at Senate Hearing,” Environmental Health Trust channel, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekNC0J3xx1w.

This complete lack of safety testing for 5G is rather shocking, given the abundant evidence of physical harm from the less intense 4G and Wi-Fi, a matter I addressed in an interview with wireless educator Cece Doucette.1 Peer-reviewed scientific studies have linked wireless radiation to cancer, DNA damage, heart irregularities, lowered sperm counts, and many other health issues. For anyone looking for an introduction to wireless dangers, I recommend downloading the film Generation Zapped, winner of the Best Documentary at the 2018 D.C. Independent Film Festival; it includes compelling testimony from leading world scientists, doctors, and public health experts, as well as victims.

NOTES

1. “Fact Checking the 5G/Coronavirus Hypothesis,” The Corbett Report, March 6, 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cszlsGiD1-E.

2. Ronald Kostoff, The Largest Unethical Medical Experiment in Human History, https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/62452/LARGEST_UNETHICAL_ MEDICAL_EXPERIMENT_FINAL.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowe.

3. Magda Havas, “Is There an Association Between Covid-19 Cases/Deaths and 5G in the United States?” April 22, 2020, https://magdahavas.com/5g-and-mm-waves/is-there-an-association-between-covid-19-cases-deaths-and-5g-in-the-united-states/.

4. Shigeaki Hakusui, “Fixed Wireless Communications at 60GHz Unique Oxygen Absorption Properties,” RF Globalnet, April 10, 2001, https://www.rfglobalnet.com/doc/fixed-wireless-communications-at-60ghz-unique-0001.

5. “What Frequency Spectrum Will 5G Technology Use and How Does This Compare to 4G?” Arrow, February 15, 2019, https://www.arrow.com/en/research-and-events/articles/what-frequency-spectrum-will-5g-technology-use-and-how-does-this-compare-to-4g.

6. “5G Will Use the Same Frequencies as Pain-Inflicting Military Weapon,” Scientists for Wired Technology, Feb 27, 2018, https://scientists4wiredtech.com/2019/02/5g-will-use-the-same-frequencies-as-pain-inflicting-military- weapon/. 1 7. “James Perloff Interviews Wireless Educator Cece Doucette about the Health Risks of Wi-Fi, the Coming 5G, and What People Can Do to Protect Themselves and Their Communities,”JamesPerloff.com, December 18, 2018,

https://jamesperloff.com/2018/12/18/james-perloff-interviews-wireless-educator-cece-doucette-about-the-health-risks-of-wi-fi-the-coming-5g-and-what-people-can-do-to-protect-themselves-and-their-communities/.

Suggested reading: BÉCHAMP OR PASTEUR? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology by
Ethel Douglas Hume; PASTEUR: PLAGIARIST, IMPOSTOR The Germ Theory Exploded R.B. Pearson
The Private Science of Louis Pasteur, by Dr Gerald Geison; The Blood and its Third Element by Professor Antoine Béchamp

Quote from “Good-Bye Germ Theory” by Dr. William Trebing

The idea of entities called “germs” maybe causing disease predates Louis Pasteur by Louis Pasteur by several centuries. However, in 1878 Louis Pasteur was credited with the full tenets of the germ theory, solidifying all its’ laws and postulates which are used this very day in the determination of disease. History paints a much better picture of Pasteur than reality dictates, as he is credited with solving the mystery of fermentation, the silk worm disease in France, the rabies dilemma of his time, as well as being able to control the spread of anthrax through his vaccine. Hey, after all, its’ been on TV! It must have happened that way.

Who was Louis Pasteur, really? He was a chemist. He had no formal training in biology, as the story dictates. The discovery of fermentation did not belong to Pasteur alone. The Silk Worm “cure” that he instituted cut the production of silk in France by half.

More people got sick and died from his rabies vaccine then ever had rabies to begin with during his time. In 1956, JAMA ( The Journal of the American Medical Association ) reported that the Academy of Medicine in France found “Pasteur’s rabies vaccinations may be followed as much as 20 years later with a rare form of psychosis.” This, at the very least, shows the AMA acknowledged at some point in time that vaccines can cause health problems decades later. It has been shown statistically that in countries where the Pasteur rabies vaccine has been employed, the number of deaths from hydrophobia (rabies) has actually increased and not diminished.

Pasteur’s anthrax vaccine in Russia was nothing short of a disaster. 4,500 sheep were administered the vaccine, and 3,600 dropped dead almost immediately following. Pasteur’s rabies vaccine killed King Alexander of Greece, who was given the treatment after being bitten by a monkey. He died within one week of the vaccine. These are all the wonderful Pasteurian facts you’ve never heard in school.

What really happened around 1878? Well, it turns out that the real credit for most of Pasteur’s success belonged to a man named Pierre Bechamp. He was a French scientist contemporary to Pasteur, who for some reason not fully understood, made all the discoveries given claim to Pasteur well before they became common knowledge. Pasteur and Bechamp may have had some form of working agreement that was never known to historians, but it is said in some historical circles that Pasteur actually plagiarized most of Bechamp’s hard work. Bechamp was known as a quiet, humble man that did not like the limelight. Bechamp continued to pursue his work quietly as Pasteur became more popular with most of Bechamp’s earliest discoveries, including fermentation.

Bechamp’s work was based on the observation of live tissues ( as opposed to dead tissue samples of lab work today ). In these live tissues, he saw tiny bodies he called Microzyma. He then went on to propose publicly that these Microzyma were the basic unit of life, indestructible, immutable and eternal. He found these bodies in both plant and animal tissue. He found them in both healthy and diseased tissue. In healthy tissue, he found them to be normal, constructive parts of the growing metabolism of the cell. In unhealthy tissue, he discovered that they evolved into bacteria. By this time, Pasteur was off on his own running with his recreation of the germ theory. He did not realize what Bechamp had realized; that the medium determines whether or not micro-organisms, such as bacteria are present. Bechamp saw clearly that bacteria are endogenous; that is, they come from within us. From within our own tissues and cells from some basic point of life, in which he called Microzyma. The important difference here, is that Bechamp realized bacteria and other microbes are formed out of necessity by the body itself. They do not come from some outside attacking mode of virulence. It’s too bad that Pasteur, who was best at promoting himself, did not catch on to this theory of the Microzyma. For if he did, things would be a lot better today for it.

Bechamp carried on some fantastic experiments that never made it to the history books. All of his work confirmed his belief in the presence of Microzyma, that all bacteria originate from them, and
that bacteria are pleomorphic ( able to change shape ) upon the need of the tissue. Pasteur on the other hand, claimed that bacteria are monomorphic ( only one shape per strain, or “species” of bacteria ), and that they originate from outside the body in nature. Pasteur postulated that there is one bacteria or other microbe for each disease.

This microbe is the causative agent of the disease, and you will find it in every sick tissue of that diseased person or animal.

Bechamp obtained the carcass of a kitten and embedded it in calcium carbonate ( chalk ) for approximately 8 years. He took special care to prepare the carcass aseptically, which means no “germs” could possibly get in through the outside world. Upon examination of the carcass after this 8 year period, as would be suspected he found it primarily decomposed. He repeated this experiment again, only this time he removed all the dead internal organs, treated them separately with another aseptic process, and examined the organs and the skeleton separately after a shorter period of years. He found identical results; in both cases, there were varying forms of bacteria with abundant Microzyma. Other scientists became intrigued with Bechamp’s work and decided to repeat the process for themselves. Internal organs were taken from varying dead animals. The external portions of the organs were then treated aseptically, usually with an alcohol base or other antiseptic, bactericidal fluid. This was to ensure that no external microbes could affect the experiment. Some of these organs were even left suspended in a constant stream of bactericide. In all cases, it was found that where the antiseptic fluid could not reach, endogenous microbial activity flourished. How did these microbes get inside the organ? A doctor today may tell you that of course certain strains of bacteria and microbes are endogenous. They sit inside our body, in all our organs, waiting to take advantage of the medium when its’ resistance is low, or in this case, quite dead, to take over and ingest the now morbid organic matter.

The medical profession is mostly correct with this fact, but they miss one subtle and very vital point. The microbes, such as the differing strains of bacteria, are not there as evil opportunists;
hidden time bombs just waiting in the shadows to take advantage of our low resistance. They are actually created out of our necessity, following the commands of the organic web of life. They spring forth within each cell upon the need. In a living person, they spring forth to eat poisonous organic material, with the most common form being that of foreign or excess proteins, in an effort to cleanse the system. If there is an abundance of toxicity, especially in the form of proteins either from vaccines or poor dietary habits, they will be created in abundance. Their respiratory, metabolic and excretory processes ( breathing, eating and going to the bathroom processes, just like you and I ), can then make the surrounding body tissue sore. This is when we go to the medical doctor, he takes a culture of our throat and tells us we have a bacterial infestation. Here, take these antibiotics! This is as smart as blaming rats for the garbage pileups that occur during a sanitation worker strike. The rats are just there doing their job! They eat garbage, and if you don’t want to see them around your neighborhood anymore, well then, clean up the garbage. Spraying rat poison on the garbage pileups is only a temporary solution, and one that has serious side effects to the greater good of your neighborhood.

Taking antibiotics for this kind of bacterial “infection,” is the same bad idea. The bacteria did not create your sickness.

Nor did the virus, the yeast, or any other natural microbe you can name ( save the ones created by government genetic experiments to actually cause havoc with living tissue ). You are sick because you have a sick system, either physically, emotionally, spiritually, or some combination of the three. The microbes that arise from your cells, quite possibly through Bechamp’s Microzyma, are members of the web of life called Saprophytes.

These are defined as a group of micro-organisms whose sole existence is designed by God to break down dead, diseased and or dying organic material into its’ simpler forms of organic chemicals. The Biblical ashes to ashes and dust to dust scenario.

Nothing in the web of life is ever wasted. When physical matter becomes devoid of life force; i.e., when you leave your physical body at the time of so called “death,” the organic materials which comprise the physical form are broken down and thus returned to the Earth from whence they arose. The physical form cannot survive without the spirit, life force energy which animates it through the nervous system. It is simply a vehicle for this energy, which as Einstein stated, “can never be created nor destroyed.” Now consider a smaller version of total physical death; simple cellular death, which occurs thousands of times each second with the rebirth of new, healthy body cells. In a totally fit and healthy individual, white blood cells of the immune system find it easy to handle the job of cleaning up these dead cells with some help from indigenously created microbes, like bacteria. This is precisely why, healthy or not, a throat culture will always show some bacterial activity. Microbes are never absent from your body. They are a ubiquitous form, and fact of life. But most people are not so healthy, since most people do not exercise healthy habits, physically, emotionally and spiritually. To the direct proportional degree that we do not exercise healthy habits, we have a proportional level of increased cellular death. When the white blood cells and antibodies of the immune system cannot handle the load of this increased cellular clean up, microbes are created, indigenously, as extra workers for the process.

Pasteur, being the chemist that he was, saw this connection ( which he most likely acquired from Bechamp ) that bacteria and other microbes carry out chemical processes within the body. He also noticed that these chemical processes have to do with microbial respiration, metabolism and excretion. Pasteur’s difference however was in his lack of vision. The party line during his time was demanding a culprit enemy for the high level of disease in certain areas of the globe, and Pasteur was determined to give them one.

Microbes, due to Pasteur, then became the phantom ghosts of disease. A new enemy to wage war on, taking the responsibility ( once again ) off the people; in this case it meant the responsibility of providing sanitary living conditions, both externally and internally. (…)

External sanitation improved by leaps and bounds into the turn of the 20th century. This is why all statistical research shows major infectious disease rates declining rapidly around 1910. But the war on germs was seen to be a worthwhile one, most likely due to a mixture of human superstition and greed. Out of this war was born the oppressive medical cartel we are all struggling with today.
It’s time we educate the people as to the truth, and real purpose of these microbes, and end this fictional war. It is high time to say, “Good-Bye Germ Theory!”

The Bechamp experiment was reproduced many times by many scientists through the early 1900’s. Upon the advancement of laboratory procedure, isolated tissues were used instead of entire organs suspended in aseptic fluid. The same results were produced time and time again. On the outside of the tissue that had been in contact with the aseptic material, there were obviously no microbes.

There were microbes, as before, within all of the more internal cells that did not contact the fluid. Finally around the turn of the 20th century, there were some interesting technological advances which gave birth to the work of another brilliant American scientist named Raymond Riffe.

In the 1920s, Riffe postulated that there was something he was not seeing when he looked at cellular materials under the common compound microscope of his time. He brilliantly theorized that the reason he could not see everything one could see when viewing living tissue under a microscope, was because of the lack of ultraviolet light, in which the common microscope’s lenses could not detect. The glass of a common microscope does not allow UV radiation to enter the Field of view. Riffe then built a series of amazing microscopes, that still to this day are second to none. For example, all of his lenses were made of quartz crystal, and not glass. This allowed the full range of UV light to come into the scope’s field of view. He then began to see another realm of existence.

Riffe also came up with a system of magnification that rivaled early electron microscopes of our day; about 150,000 X magnification. He viewed all kinds of tissues with his new scopes, live and dead, and found Bechamp’s Microzyma everywhere. When viewing these Microzyma with the quartz scope, under higher and higher magnification he found smaller and smaller units of Microzyma. Like Bechamp, Riffe discovered that these small units of life spontaneously evolved into varying forms of larger micro-organisms, solely dependent on the type of tissue in which they existed ( healthy or toxic ). Amazingly enough, he completed experiments where through carefully controlling the level of toxicity within any given tissue, he was able to have the Microzyma evolve into a viral type of organism that created cancer in the tissue every time.

This of course, indicated an intimate connection between cellular toxicity and cancer. From this place, he attempted to work on a cure for cancer by reversing the process. These experiments were not successful, however Riffe continued his work to the discovery of healing EMF ( electromagnetic fields ). He built a device which created EMF s that could disintegrate certain viral substances from a distance. Riffe was truly a brilliant man, unfortunately lost to history on purpose through the actions of the medical cartel.

The Journal for the Franklin Institute in Pennsylvania wrote an article about Riffe’s work in 1944. The title of the article was, “The New Microscopes:”

“Riffe showed that by altering the environment and food supply, friendly germs such as colon bacillus can be converted into pathogenic germs, such as typhoid, and that this process is reversible. Experiments in the Riffe lab established that the virus of cancer, like viruses from other diseases, can easily be changed from one form to another by means of altering the media upon which they feed…. with the first change of the media, the cancer virus becomes enlarged (looking very much like E. coli ) … . observation under an ordinary scope is made possible through a second alteration in media . … a third change is undergone upon an asparagus based media, where this cancer virus is now transformed from its’ filterable state into cryptomyces pleomorphia fungi . . . .”

This is a very important article to the nature of our discussion.

Riffe was able to show from this experiment, that took place in the 1940s, that he could take the virus that created cancer in his lab animals and turn it into E. Coli ( the friendly colon bacillus ), and then into a fungus! This fits in well with the basic premise of our text. These microbes are saprophytes, produced primarily for breaking down matter into its’ constituent elements. This is precisely what they do when you get sick. They are not attacking you. Indeed, they are attempting to help bring you back to better health and wholeness. By removing the diseased, toxic cellular material from your tissues, you are better able to create new healthy cells to heal the tissue. The nature of disease is NOT germs. The true nature of disease is the toxic input you place into your body, or randomly run across in your drinking water from pollution or radiation, and your body’s quest to eliminate it.

We said before that so called “germs” are ubiquitous. They are ever present, in many varying forms in both healthy and sick people. These microbes kick into what modern scientists call pathogens, when the media is toxic and conducive to clean up. When you enter into a healing crisis, and your body is throwing off toxins, these “germs” appear out of your very substance, to help eliminate, process and break down these toxins. Germs have absolutely no causal relationship to disease.
But germs do appear to help you clean out, because put quite simply, your disease is your cure!

Modern medical professionals have made a very false, yet understandable assumption, that germs create disease due to their mere presence in sick people. This is a vast oversimplification of the real process however, and it is high time to end it.

Riffe’s work is actually preceded by another great study completed by Dr. H. Rosenaeu at the Mayo Biological Laboratory in 1910. He did the reverse process of Riffe, who showed you can turn bacteria into different forms by altering their environment. Roseneau took a myriad of disease germs and placed them in the same media, and found that over time they all transformed into the same micro-organism!

Rational Bacteriology is a milestone, yet out of print text of microbiology. It was independently published in 1953 by three doctors, Verner, Weiant and Watkins. This text confirms Bechamp’s work, and speaks of the actual basis of bacteriology that is not Pasteurian propaganda. It cites countless experiments, hidden from the public, which prove that micro-organisms like bacteria are formed from “granules” which are inherent as a healthy constituent of every living cell.

When these granules morph into bacteria, they do so to ACTUALLY BOOST IMMUNITY AND AID IN THE HEALING PROCESS. Staphylococci bacteria were found to be a primary force involved in the production of white blood cells for immunity against varying poisons, as well as generalized blood clotting.This truth is miles away from the Pasteurian nonsense we were all led to believe in school; that these “bad germs” are single minded opportunists that work for your persistent demise. Nothing could be further from the truth. They are part of the bodies defense mechanism to clean house and purify the system back to homeostasis (balance).

They exist in this granular form until needed. When are they needed? When your body has reached a certain limit of toxicity from your external environment, or more likely, your dietary and drinking habits. What does the medical establishment say to do once they detect these bacterial healing agents? Wipe them out with antibiotics (translation is “against-life”)and other toxic drugs, and further turn your internal body fluids into a toxic soup. This Germ-Theory of the Dark Ages is nothing but a deliberate mass insanity pushed upon society to gain profit and power. By acting against microbes as the medical establishment dictates, one is actually helping to dig one’s own grave, while paying someone else to show where to dig. This insanity must end.

Rational Bacteriology states:

“Extensive studies of bacteria show definitely that there are no fixed species. A cocci can become a bacilli, a spirili, and vice versa. All bacteria either acquire or loose virulence depending upon their environment. Bacteria change to molds and vice versa in response to adequate environmental stimuli. Furthermore, they can resolve into their smallest form, a sub-microscopic granule [ Bechamp’s Microzyma ]. The bacterial “toxins” which were once thought to be entirely free of particles, are not really homogeneous solutions at all, but actually contain the tiny granular stages of bacteria which broke down to form them.”

The largest problem I have discovered with presenting such evidence in today’s “modern scientific world,” is that the professionals say, “so what if all this is true! They can transform all they like, and who cares about Microzyma? Germs still cause disease!” Studies are not done on the correlation of “germs” to disease anymore, because the scientific community assumes that germs create disease without question. This is similar to the witch hunts of old, where everyone was certain there were witches running about, and if you were a non-believer, perhaps you should be burned at the stake as well! Any work challenging the correlation of germs to any disease is simply not supported, and due to finances, simply viewed as a waste of time and money. What pharmaceutical company do you know that will fund a study to prove that germs have no correlation with the creation of disease? Bechamp’s findings can easily be reproduced today, but no one wants to reproduce them. The medical cartel has suppressed any information available on such discoveries, and financially discourages medical professionals from inquiring further study into Microzyma. Since virtually no one on Earth knows of this information today, it can be said that they have been immensely successful in their suppression of the truth.