John Wear – katana17

The Dresden Firestorm Massacre Was A Botched Allied Mission If The ‘Official’ Death Toll Is To Be Believed & The Victims Are Conveniently Vaporized From History

admin — Fri, 15 Feb 2019 11:53:17 +0000

The Plum Cake

admin — Sat, 18 Apr 2015 01:07:11 +0000

The Plum Cake

By John Weir/Wear

[In this short article by John Weir (Wear), first published in The Revisionist, a journal published from 1999 to 2005 by Bradley R. Smith (founder of CODOH) an issue in itself fatal to the whole “Holocaust” narrative is discussed, namely where is the “Hitler order” to kill all the jews?

As Weir argues it simply never existed because there never was any plan or order, either in writing or given orally, to kill all the jews! If there had been even a secret oral order it would have generated an avalanche of paper work from subordinates seeking clear confirmation for why they need to kill all the jews! That doesn’t exist.

Wear likens it to the circular reasoning logic of Alice in Wonderland where she has to distribute the plum cake pieces before she has cut it into pieces.

The Holocaust story-tellers start with “fact” that the “Holocaust” occurred and then reason backwards that there therefore had to have been a plan and an order somewhere!

What is a fact is that diabolical lies have been told against Germans, and Whites in general, to justify the ongoing White Genocide agenda now being carried out.

– KATANA]

Since the end of World War II a search has continued, and for many has ended with the quarry having eluded its hunters. Some believe what they seek never existed in physical form, but existed nonetheless. It is vitally important that it existed during the war though it has never been located by those chasing it ever since Germany’s defeat. Though no one has seen it, circumstances dictate that it must exist. The fabulous item assumed, but never seen, is the order to commence the extermination of Jews.

The logic behind the assumption of a “Hitler order” is that since there was a Nazi program to exterminate Jews, it must have been ordered by someone; and the someone with authority to do it in Nazi Germany was Adolf Hitler. But no such order has ever been found. This being the case, the order must have either been destroyed or issued orally and never committed to paper. Or so the argument goes.

[Image] Michael Shermer author of Denying History

Michael Shermer in his Holotome, Denying History goes into a long, convoluted explanation as to why Hitler resorted to ordering the murder of Europe’s Jews without committing the elusive order to paper: It seems he had been pressured by various religious and political organizations into suspending his euthanasia program and didn’t want to be embarrassed again by having his signature on a piece of paper in case the same should happen with the “Final Solution.”

[Image] Michael Shermer’s Denying History

This explanation for an oral Hitler order is speculative. It also explains nothing since the pressure that was brought to bear to end the killing of disabled Germans had little to do with the fact that the order was written. If no paper order existed, relatives of the victims would still have brought pressure to have it stopped. And Hitler would have still been the logical focus for that pressure — a paper order bearing his signature would have made no difference.

Countering the need for Hitler to avoid embarrassment would have been the need for those carrying out the order to have a copy of it. An order is more than an command to do something. It confers the authority to a subordinate to fulfill the instructions given him by his superior. It also identifies who is responsible for the order along the chain of command and whether this person has the authority to issue it.

A German housewife during the war needed papers in the form of coupons in order to purchase butter or almost anything else. When she had run out of coupons she could not buy any more butter. People needed papers when traveling, or working. Nazi Germany was a top-down bureaucracy where paperwork was needed to do nearly everything. When anyone wanted to do something out of the ordinary, permission would have to be requested from the proper authorities who would then issue the proper papers granting permission. Yet this pattern is broken with the extermination of the Jews and no viable explanation as to why this is the case has ever been offered.

Written orders to kill Jews under Nazi control would have to have been issued. There is no way around it since issuing an oral command would have created its own consequences. Such consequences would have been as obvious in the historical record as any written order. For example, any time someone with any authority passed through Auschwitz or Treblinka or any of the “extermination camps” he would have asked what the meaning of the pyres piled high with dead bodies was. Such a visitor would ask to see the order which granted the camp administration the power and authority to wantonly kill camp inmates. When those in charge could not produce such documentation, because the order was oral, the requester would naturally have written to Berlin to request confirmation. Berlin would have to respond. One would expect to find hundreds of such letters if the extermination camps were operating on oral authorization. These queries and requests for verification would have produced a paper trail which would have survived the war since copies of this correspondence would have proliferated as they made their way through the Nazi bureaucracy in duplicate and triplicate.

One line of argument used to explain the void in documents relating to the Holocaust is that the order to kill the Jews along with other documents relating to the extermination program were destroyed by the Nazis in order to hide their crimes. This too is unlikely since it would have been nearly impossible to keep track of all of these documents. In addition, Allied intelligence agents had infiltrated the Nazi government and were intercepting coded German communications. The enemies of the Nazi Germany would have leaked these to the Allies long before the end of the war. Those implementing the orders would have had a strong incentive not to destroy these orders since these could be used in their defense in the event of their prosecution for war crimes.

For these and other reasons the “verbal command from Hitler” explanation is not credible. Rather it is an example of circular logic. Like Alice’s plum cake in Through the Looking Glass which she had to distribute before she could cut it, one has to start with the conclusion that there was a Nazi policy to exterminate the Jews before determining that a Hitler order must exist: There was an extermination program therefore there was an order to initiate it. Since no order has been found, an explanation for why the order is missing was created as a substitute to support the conclusion of an extermination program which was really assumed in the first place.

Such thinking is clearly backwards. Since no order has been found, [2]and one would be needed to initiate an extermination program as government policy, logic dictates that there was no extermination program. Our conclusion must follow our premise. Holocaust authors like Michael Shermer argue that evidence for the extermination program comes by way of a missing Hitler order. That the order was either given orally or destroyed can be concluded since the extermination program existed. Refusing our piece of plum cake, revisionists simply note that no order was issued because it would have been located if such an order existed. Since none has been found, the conclusion is inescapable:

There was no policy to exterminate Jews by the Nazi government.

Source: The Revisionist, Codoh Series, No. 4, 2001, pp.

http://vho.org/tr/2001/4/tr08plumcake.html

________________________

Notes

[1] From Through the Looking Glass Chapter VII:

http://www.bragi.com/classics/c/lc1832/tlg07.shtml

‘I’m sure I don’t know,’ the Lion growled out as he lay down again. ‘There was too much dust to see anything. What a time the Monster is, cutting up that cake!’

Alice had seated herself on the bank of a little brook, with the great dish on her knees, and was sawing away diligently with the knife. ‘It’s very provoking!’ she said, in reply to the Lion (she was getting quite used to being called ‘the Monster’). ‘I’ve cut several slices already, but they always join on again!’

‘You don’t know how to manage Looking-glass cakes,’ the Unicorn remarked. ‘Hand it round first, and cut it afterwards.’

This sounded nonsense, but Alice very obediently got up, and carried the dish round, and the cake divided itself into three pieces as she did so. ‘Now cut it up,’ said the Lion, as she returned to her place with the empty dish.

‘I say, this isn’t fair!’ cried the Unicorn, as Alice sat with the knife in her hand, very much puzzled how to begin. ‘The Monster has given the Lion twice as much as me!’

‘She’s kept none for herself, anyhow,’ said the Lion. ‘Do you like plum-cake, Monster?’

[2] The long lost (but now found) Hitler order [Ver 2]

[Image – click to enlarge] Could this be the long lost Hitler order??

The Daily Fail (a highly reputable British newspaper, sometimes known as the Daily Mail) reports that this document was reportedly found by Moshie Goldberg, a diamond dealer and ex-arms dealer now residing in Tel Aviv, in the back pocket of a dreaded, yet recently dead, SS officer, as Berlin fell in 1945. He swears on a stack of bibles on its authenticity.

Experts, from prestigious universities, after rigorous analysis funded by the Weaselberg Foundation believe this could be the the actual original document that sent at least six million Jews to their doom! The greatest crime ever committed in the history of mankind!

Questions as to why it was written in English were waved aside, by an expert historian, Sir Trevor Raper, as baloney and disgustingly anti-semitic.

“The evil Nazis were well advanced in their plans to invade Britain as part of their diabolical scheme to conquer the entire world. The Nazi hierarchy were busy learning English, as Great Britain was the nation that had already conquered most of the entire world. As such Hitler himself was learning English and setting an example by issuing all orders in English, inadvertently creating so much confusion, that it caused them to lose the war!

It [English] was one of our greatest secret weapons.

…

If it wasn’t for the valiant and heroic efforts of the British people, and the Allies, we would be all be speaking German today, and ironically, all the Germans would be speaking English!”

Source: katana

===============================================

Version History

Version 8: Sep 17, 2023 — Added my Intro.

Version 7: Feb 15, 2023 — Updated image links.

Version 6: Jan 27, 2020 — Added See Also links.

Version 5: Oct 7, 2019 — Re-uploaded images and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version.

Version 4: Sep 12, 2018 – Improved formatting.

Version 3: May 1, 2015 – Edited footnote [2]. Added PDF Ver 3.

Version 2: Apr 30, 2015 – Added to footnote [2]. Added PDF Ver 2.

Version 1: Published Apr 18, 2015

Holocaust Eyewitnesses: Is the Testimony Reliable?

admin — Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:51:00 +0000

Holocaust Eyewitnesses:

Is the Testimony Reliable?

UNCENSORED HOLOCAUST HISTORY

THE BARNES REVIEW • JULY/AUGUST 2013

By John Wear

INEVITABLY, WHEN ANYONE QUESTIONS THE GENOCIDE of European Jewry, the eyewitness testimony is raised as proof that the genocide happened. However, most of the eyewitness accounts of the holocaust story have proved to be extremely unreliable and at times even laughable. See for yourself.

[Image] June 3, 1992, John Demjanjuk laughs in Israel’s Supreme Court in Jerusalem.

John Demjanjuk, a naturalized American citizen, was accused by eyewitnesses of being a murderous guard at Treblinka named Ivan the Terrible.

Demjanjuk was deported to Israel, and an Israeli court tried and convicted him primarily based on the eyewitness testimony of five Jewish survivors of Treblinka. Demjanjuk’s defense attorney eventually uncovered new evidence proving that the Soviet KGB had framed Demjanjuk, and that documents supposedly showing him to be a guard at Treblinka were Soviet forgeries. The Israeli Supreme Court ruled that the eyewitness accounts were not credible and that Demjanjuk was innocent. [1]

[Image] Frank Walus (right) next to Ernst Zundel.

Another example of false witness testimony of the holocaust story occurred in the case of Frank Walus, who was a retired Chicago factory worker charged with killing Jews in his native Poland during the war. An accusation by Simon Wiesenthal that Walus had worked for the Gestapo prompted the U.S. government’s legal action.

During Walus’ trial 11 Jews testified under oath that Walus had murdered Jews during the war. After a costly four-year legal battle, Walus was finally able to prove that he had spent the war years as a teenager working on German farms. An American Bar Association article published in 1981 concluded in regard to Walus’ trial that:

“… in an atmosphere of hatred and loathing verging on hysteria, the government persecuted an innocent man.” [2]

It would be impossible for me to discuss every eyewitness account of the Holocaust story. To illustrate the unreliability of eyewitness accounts of the Holocaust story, I will analyze the eyewitness accounts of probably its three most famous survivors: Elie Wiesel, Simon Wiesenthal, and Viktor Frankl.

ELIE WIESEL

Elie Wiesel, whose autobiography Night written in 1956 helped him win the Nobel Peace Prize, never mentions homicidal gas chambers in his book. Instead, Wiesel writes that Jews were killed en masse by being thrown alive in burning pits. [3] If there had actually been homicidal gas chambers at Birkenau [Auschwitz II], one would think that Wiesel would have mentioned the gas chambers in his autobiography. Also, if there had been burning pits at Birkenau, these would have shown in some of the Allied aerial photographs taken of Birkenau in 1944.

[Image] Elie Wiesel’s autobiography Night — earlier and later editions.

Wiesel also mentions in Night that he had surgery on an infected foot in January 1945. The German authorities at Birkenau gave Wiesel and other hospital patients unfit to travel the option to remain in the camp. Wiesel and his father decided to evacuate Birkenau and travel to Buchenwald with the Germans rather than be liberated by the Russian army. [4]

[Image] Map of the Auschwitz camp complex (click to enlarge).

If Birkenau had been a place of mass exterminations, why would Wiesel choose to travel with his supposed killers? Also, why would the German authorities at Birkenau leave behind thousands of witnesses to their genocide if a policy of genocide had actually taken place at Birkenau?

[Image] All three of these men are considered “best witnesses” to the “holocaust.”

Left, perhaps the planet’s biggest liar, Elie Wiesel, used photo fakery to “prove” he was an inmate in Buchenwald. Evidently he was never even in Buchenwald at all, yet he has made millions on books and speaking engagements telling people about the “horrors” he saw there.

Middle, famous Austrian Jewish “Nazi-hunter” Simon Wiesenthal claimed he had a concentration camp tattoo but would not show it to anyone. Photos of his arm didn’t show any tattoo at all. Was he even in a camp? He stands accused of making millions of dollars by flagrant lying.

Right, Viktor Frankl, another shady fellow, had a best-selling book in which he described his extensive experiences in Auschwitz — yet he was ultimately forced to admit he spent four days or less there.

That Wiesel survived his internment at Buchenwald is, of course, the result of a miracle. Wiesel states:

“In Buchenwald they sent 10,000 persons to their deaths each day. I was always in the last hundred near the gate. They stopped. Why?” [5]

[Image] See: Tales of the Holocaust — A Historian’s Assessment.

Image Text: Pope Elie’s Miraculous Escape

The Pope of the Holy Hoax is his Pontificance, Elie Wiesel. By a miracle, Pope Elie survived the Nazi killing machine at Auschwitz only to be imprisoned in Buchenwald where according to Elie, “They sent ten thousand to their death every day!”

But despite the methodical nature of the Nazi killing machine, Pope Elie miraculously escaped being killed. “I was always in the last hundred (to be killed) near the gate.”

… Yet the Nazis never got him … IT WAS A MIRACLE!

Loudspeaker: … We repeat! … Number 100 … Pope Elie … Report to the gas chamber at once!

Pope Elie: … I keep tellin’ ya … I’m busy … Re-schedule me, already!

Today no credible historian believes that 10,000 Jews per day were executed at Buchenwald.

A remarkable witness himself, Wiesel assures us that he has met other remarkable witnesses. Wiesel states in one of his books that after Jews were executed at Babi Yar in Ukraine:

“Eyewitnesses say that for months after the killings the ground continued to spurt geysers of blood. One was always treading on corpses.” [6]

Wiesel repeats this claim later with some embellishment:

“Later, I learn from a witness that, for month after month, the ground never stopped trembling; and that, from time to time, geysers of blood spurted from it.” [7]

This story lacks all credibility.

Wiesel does not seem to know that photos taken at Babi Yar shortly after the alleged mass executions of Jews show no indication of any mass grave site or any disturbance of the foliage or ground cover. [8]

SIMON WIESENTHAL

Famed Nazi-hunter Simon Wiesenthal also reports a trip to a National Socialist camp hospital in his book The Murderers Among Us. Wiesenthal wrote that he tried to commit suicide by cutting his wrists while incarcerated by the National Socialists. Instead of letting him die, the National Socialists sent him to the hospital, where they nursed him back to health. [9] If the National Socialists were intent on committing genocide against European Jewry, why would they make the effort to send both Wiesel and Wiesenthal to the hospital to restore their health?

[Image] Simon Wiesenthal’s book The Murderers Among Us was also made into a movie in 1989.

VIKTOR FRANKL

Viktor Frankl’s book Man’s Search for Meaning has been ranked by the Library of Congress as one of the 20th century’s 10 most influential books in the United States.

Frankl describes his experiences at Auschwitz in this book as if he had spent many months there. In reality, Frankl was in Auschwitz only for a few days in October 1944 while in transit from Theresienstadt to a sub camp of Dachau. Frankl has admitted this to the American evangelist Robert Schuller:

“I was in Auschwitz only three or four days …. I was sent to a barrack, and we were all transported to a camp in Bavaria.” [10]

[Image] Two covers of Frankl’s book Man’s Search for Meaning.

Frankl’s short time in Auschwitz is substantiated by the prisoner log from the sub camp of Dachau, Kaufering III, which listed Frankl’s arrival on October 25, 1944, six days after his departure from Theresienstadt. [11] Thus, Frankl’s descriptions of his long stay at Auschwitz in Man’s Search for Meaning are pure fiction.

PREPOSTEROUS VERBOSITY

The unreliability of eyewitness testimony of the holocaust story has also been commented on by some historians. Jewish historian Samuel Gringauz criticized what he called the “hyperhistorical” nature of most Jewish survivor testimony. Gringauz wrote that;

“Most of the memoirs and reports are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors bias, partisan attacks and apologies.” [12]

Shmuel Krakowski, archives director of Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust Center, confirmed in 1986 that more than half the testimonies of Jewish survivors on file there are unreliable. Krakowski said many survivors, wanting to be a part of history, may have let their imaginations run away from them. He stated that many of the testimonies on file at Yad Vashem were later proved to be inaccurate when locations and dates could not pass an expert historian’s appraisal. Krakowski commented on the Jewish survivor testimony:

“Many were never in the places where they claimed to have witnessed atrocities, while others relied on second-hand information given them by friends or passing strangers.” [13]

Although seldom mentioned in the press, numerous eyewitnesses have reported that they did not see any evidence of genocide in the National Socialist concentration camps. One of the first to dispute reports of National Socialist genocide was Paul Rassinier.

Rassinier was a French professor of history who was arrested during the war for passive resistance activities, which included helping to smuggle Jews into neutral Switzerland. Rassinier stated that although he suffered greatly during the war in the Buchenwald and Dora concentration camps, he never saw any evidence of homicidal gas chambers nor any program to exterminate the Jews. After reading sensationalized accounts he knew were false, Rassinier felt it was his ethical duty to tell the truth about the camps and refute the false claims being made in the world’s press.

[Image] Paul Rassinier and his book The Drama of the European Jews (Das Drama der Juden Europas). He came to the following conclusion:

“During the last 15 years, outside of Soviet-occupied territories, when someone named a witness who claimed to have himself attended the gassings, I went there immediately to record his testimony. And each time the same thing happened: with my file in hand, I asked so many precise questions to the witness, that he finally declared that a good friend, unfortunately deceased, whose testimony could not be questioned, told him about the matter. In this way, I have laid back thousands of kilometers across Europe.”

Rassinier wrote extensively about his own experiences and observations in the German camps. He also began to research the entire issue of National Socialist genocide against the Jews during the war. Rassinier concluded that the death toll in the camps was far lower than alleged. He also concluded that the deaths in the camps were not caused by a German program of genocide, [14] but rather primarily by the poor conditions of the camps attributable to the economic collapse of Germany during a devastating war. Rassinier had nothing to gain personally from taking his unpopular position, and after suffering greatly in the German concentration camps, he then suffered intense persecution in postwar France for his courageous writings after the war.

[Image] Thies Christophersen being interviews by Ernst Zundel, 1992. Ernst Zundel Interview mit Thies Christophersen ueber die Auschwitz Luege 1992 GER [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSa43yWqnpk]

Thies Christophersen was another witness who said the alleged genocide of Jews during the war never happened. Christophersen supervised about 300 workers, many of them Jewish, at Auschwitz from January to December 1944. On a number of occasions during this period he visited Birkenau, where allegedly hundreds of thousands of Jews were being gassed to death. In a memoir first published in Germany in 1973, The Auschwitz Lie, Christophersen wrote that during the time he was at Auschwitz he did not notice the slightest evidence of mass gassings.

In March 1988 at the Ernst Zundel trial in Toronto, he also successfully answered numerous pointed questions by the prosecuting attorney about his experiences at Auschwitz.

[Image] AUSCHWITZ — A Personal Account by Thies Christophersen. First English edition 1974 under the title, The Auschwitz Lie

(Note: This booklet can be viewed and downloaded in English and German versions at https://katana17.com/wp/2013/05/05/auschwitz-a-personal-account-by-thies-christophersen/)

After The Auschwitz Lie was published, Christophersen received thousands of letters and calls. He wrote in regard to these letters and calls:

Many of those who contacted me can confirm my statements, but are afraid to do so publicly. Some of those are SS men who were brutally mistreated and even tortured in Allied captivity. I also immediately contacted those who claimed to know more about mass gassings. My experiences were precisely the same as those of French professor Paul Rassinier. I have not found any eyewitnesses. Instead, people would tell me that they knew someone who knew someone else, who talked about it.

In most cases the alleged eyewitnesses had died.

Other supposed eyewitnesses would quickly begin to stammer and stutter when I asked a few precise questions. Even Simon Wiesenthal had to finally admit before a Frankfurt district court that he was actually never in Auschwitz. All of the reports I have heard about are contradictory. Everyone seemed to tell a different story about the gas chambers. They couldn’t even agree about where they were supposed to have been located. This is also true of the so-called scholarly literature, which is full of contradictions …. [15]

[Image] Dr. Wilhelm Staglich and his book Auschwitz: A Judge looks at the Evidence. (Note: This book, along with many other related books, is available as a free download at: http://holocausthandbooks.com/)

Another eyewitness who did not see any evidence of genocide of the Jews is Dr. Wilhelm Staglich. Dr. Staglich, a German judge, visited Auschwitz several times during the Second World War as a German orderly officer of an Anti-aircraft Detachment. Dr. Staglich published the following account of his visits to Auschwitz:

On none of these visits did I see gassing installations, crematoria, instruments of torture, or similar horrors. The camp gave one the impression of being well-kept and very well-organized ….

The camp reminded me of the German Labor Front camp in which I served out my six-month stretch in the Labor Service, except that Auschwitz was, of course, considerably larger ….

None of the inmates behaved as though they were in fear of mistreatment, let alone death.

On the later point, one encounter with inmates especially sticks in my memory. As some comrades and I were standing near the camp one evening, we caught sight of a big gang of inmates returning to camp from work in the industrial plants. They were escorted by a relatively small contingent of SS-men — mostly older people — and seemed to be thoroughly undisciplined.

They talked loudly among themselves, laughing all the while. Two or three inmates dropped out of line when they spotted us, opened their flies, and made water. Although this gesture could have been interpreted as a sign of contempt for German men in uniform, the SS guards ignored it completely. Later, whenever I heard that mortal terror prevailed in the concentration camps, I had to recall this incident. That is hardly the way people who are in constant fear of death behave. [16]

Another credible eyewitness is the Austrian-born Canadian Maria Van Herwaarden, who was interned at Birkenau starting in 1942. Van Herwaarden testified at the 1988 Ernst Zundel trial that she saw nothing at Birkenau that resembled mass murder. She did testify, however, that many of the inmates at Birkenau died of typhus and some inmates committed suicide. [17] No prosecution witnesses were called during this trial because the prosecution knew of no survivors who could withstand cross-examination by Zundel’s defense attorney.

While I know that National Socialist Germany did not have a program of genocide against European Jewry, I am equally certain that the inmates in the camps suffered tremendous hardships. This point was driven home to me in 1999, when I met a Jewish lady who had spent her early childhood years in four different German camps during the war. She barely survived Bergen-Belsen, where she contracted typhoid and was very close to death when the British army took control of the camp. Her experiences in the camps had been so traumatic that she still had major psychological damage from her internment 54 years after the war was over.

However, if National Socialist Germany had conducted a program of genocide against European Jewry, she would have been executed, since as a little Jewish girl she was too young to contribute to the German work effort. She was living proof that Germany did not have a program of genocide against European Jewry.

________________________

ENDNOTES:

[1] An excellent account of John Demjanjuk’s trial is provided in Sheftel, Oram, Defending “Ivan the Terrible,” Washington, D.C., Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1996.

[2] “The Nazi Who Never Was,” The Washington Post, May 10, 1981, pp. B5, 3 Wiesel, Elie, Night Trilogy, New York: Hill and Wang, 2008, pp. 51-52.

[4] Ibid., pp. 98-100.

[5] “Author, Teacher, Witness,” Time Magazine, March 18, 1985, p. 79.

[6] Wiesel, Elie, The Jews of Silence, London: Vallentine, Mitchell, 1968, p. 37.

[7] Wiesel, Elie, Paroles d’etranger, Editions du Seuil, Paris, 1982, p. 86.

[8] Ball, John C., Air Photo Evidence, Delta, B.C., Canada: Ball Resources Services Limited, 1992, p. 108.

[9] Wiesenthal, Simon, The Murderers Among Us, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967, pp. 37-38.

[10] Frankl, Viktor, “Dr. Robert Schuller Interviews Viktor Frankl: How to Find Meaning In Life,” Possibilities: The Magazine of Hope, March/April 1991, p. 10.

[11] Pytell, Timothy, “Extreme Experience, Psychological Insight, and Holocaust Perception; Reflections of Bettelheim and Frankl,” Psychoanalytic Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 4, Oct. 2007, p. 646.

[12] Jewish Social Studies, New York: Conference on Jewish Relations, Jan, 1950, Vol. 12, pp. 65-66.

[13] Amouyal, Barbara, “Doubts over Evidence of Camp Survivors,” Jerusalem Post, Israel, Aug. 17, 1986, p. 1.

[14] Rassinier, Paul, The Holocaust Story and the Lies of Ulysses, Costa Mesa, California: The Institute for Historical Review, 1978.

[15] Christophersen, Thies, “Reflections on Auschwitz and West German Justice,” The Journal of Historical Review, Volume Six, No. One, Spring 1985, p. 118.

[16] Staglich, Wilhelm, Auschwitz: A Judge Looks at the Evidence, Institute for Historical Review, 1990, p. 293.

[17] Kulaszka, Barbara, ed., Did Six Million Really Die: Report of Evidence in the Canadian ‘False News’ Trial of Ernst Zundel, Toronto: Samisdat Publishers Ltd., 1992, pp. 253-255.

JOHN WEAR was born July 11, 1953 in Houston, Texas. Mr. Wear graduated with a degree in accounting from Southern Methodist University in May 1974 and passed the CPA exam later that year. He graduated from University of Texas Law School in December 1977 and passed the Texas bar exam in February 1978.

He has worked most of his career as a CPA. His longest and most recent employment was from 1994 to 2008 working for Lacerte Software, which is a tax software division of Intuit Corporation.

======================================

PDF Notes

* Total words = 3,275
* Total images = 13
* Total A4 pages = 23

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (3.0 MB). >>

Holocaust Eyewitnesses- Is the Testimony Reliable – Ver 3

===============================================

Version History

Version 7: Nov 30, 2021 — Improved formatting.

Version 6: Jan 28, 2020 — Added See Also links.

Version 5: Oct 22, 2019 — Re-uploaded images and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version.

Version 4: Jul 24, 2018 — Improved formatting.

Version 3: Sep 26, 2017 — Improved formatting. Fixed typos. Added “Pope Elie” cartoon. Updated cover. Updated PDF (Ver 3) for download.

Version 2: May 26, 2015 — Updated cover page, added map of Auschwitz complex.

Version 1: Published Mar 18, 2015

John Wear – katana17

The Dresden Firestorm Massacre Was A Botched Allied Mission If The ‘Official’ Death Toll Is To Be Believed & The Victims Are Conveniently Vaporized From History

The Plum Cake

The Plum Cake

Notes

It [English] was one of our greatest secret weapons.

…

If it wasn’t for the valiant and heroic efforts of the British people, and the Allies, we would be all be speaking German today, and ironically, all the Germans would be speaking English!”

See Also:

Version History

Holocaust Eyewitnesses: Is the Testimony Reliable?

Holocaust Eyewitnesses:

Is the Testimony Reliable?

UNCENSORED HOLOCAUST HISTORY

THE BARNES REVIEW • JULY/AUGUST 2013

By John Wear

“… in an atmosphere of hatred and loathing verging on hysteria, the government persecuted an innocent man.” [2]

ELIE WIESEL

“In Buchenwald they sent 10,000 persons to their deaths each day. I was always in the last hundred near the gate. They stopped. Why?” [5]

“Eyewitnesses say that for months after the killings the ground continued to spurt geysers of blood. One was always treading on corpses.” [6]

“Later, I learn from a witness that, for month after month, the ground never stopped trembling; and that, from time to time, geysers of blood spurted from it.” [7]

SIMON WIESENTHAL

VIKTOR FRANKL

“I was in Auschwitz only three or four days …. I was sent to a barrack, and we were all transported to a camp in Bavaria.” [10]

PREPOSTEROUS VERBOSITY

“Most of the memoirs and reports are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors bias, partisan attacks and apologies.” [12]

“Many were never in the places where they claimed to have witnessed atrocities, while others relied on second-hand information given them by friends or passing strangers.” [13]

ENDNOTES:

See Also:

Version History