TRANSCRIPT — TEXT ONLY

If women sexual preferences are liberated and go unchecked, they destroy civilizations.

If women are allowed to choose, harems form.

If women are allowed a voice in matters that pertain to the safety of the nation, than that nation will die, inevitably.

[CIVILIZATIONAL COLLAPSE]

It’s as simple as that.

Once you realize this, you understand the entire basis behind civilized society.

[THE ENTIRE BASIS BEHIND CIVILIZED SOCIETY]

And if not, you’ll understand by the end of this video.

As this is a complicated subject, let me state briefly what I’m talking about in this video so you can follow along more closely.

[WOMEN ARE NOT CONCERNED WITH IN-GROUP LOYALTY]

Women do not, on an instinctual level, care very much about her tribe, nation or civilization. It’s in their nature not to.

[WOMEN ARE BIOLOGICAL CREATURES]

Women are biological creatures like all others and they seek to maximize their chances of having viable offspring.

[THE FEMINISATION OF THE WEST HAS BEEN A DISASTER]

This half-century-long experiment of women’s liberation and political enfranchisement has ended in disaster for the West. And the damage done to the West may be irreparable.

[WESTERN CIVILISATION MAY BE IRREPARABLY DAMAGED]

And the only solution would be a return to a more patriarchal society. And this seems highly unlikely.

I want you to hold onto this key thought as the meaning will become clear as this video progresses.

[WESTERN WOMEN]

When I’m speaking of Western women, I’m talking of women as an organism, or in general. Of course there’s a spectrum as every individual is different. But, for the purposes of this video, I’ll be speaking of Western women and their general characteristics.

[WESTERN WOMEN]

I realize that this is a sensitive topic and women with children are different from younger women.

[CAVEAT]

But it’s the broad strokes of Western women that need to be addressed.

If you’re a woman watching this and take offense to this video, please understand that I do realize that not all women are the same. But there are some very easily identifiable patterns of behavior that need to be discussed. Also key to understand is that every dramatic change that Western women have brought to society has been allowed by Western men.

Western women, or for that matter, any group of women are not consciously seeking to undermine the foundations of any particular society through calculation, or deception, or for any underlying agenda.

[MEN BUILD CIVILISATIONS]

It’s just that women have never been the builders of any of the larger edifices of civilization. And are not, and have never been responsible for maintaining them. This is borne out across every civilization throughout history.

[IN ALL SOCIETIES THROUGHOUT HISTORY]

So to be clear I am not assigning any, quote, unquote, “blame” on any group or gender in this video.

[NO BLAME OR RESPONSIBILITY]

I’m only trying to explain how I see the world that we’ve all inherited.

And let’s get this out in the open. Women are not very good at being loyal to the tribe.

[The Japanese women who married the enemy]

They never have been, they never will be. The reason is, it’s not in their nature to do so.

Women throughout history have shown time and time again. They’re quick to seek the favors of men they feel are stronger and more dominant, whether they’re part of their in-group or not.

Recent examples of this, besides Japanese or Vietnamese war brides, come from Europe and are illustrated by the countless numbers of Belgian, French, Dutch, what have you, women that took up relations with occupying German military personnel.

[Sleeping with the enemy: New book claimed Frenchwomen started baby boom with Nazi men during Vichy regime]

And this was only a short time ago, but when Nazis were defeated and social stability was restored, they were punished for their betrayal and transgressions against their people.

Now, not only are women not punished for inviting alien and unassimilated armies of men into the West, they then vote for parties that force the entire society to have its national wealth redistributed to this army of aggressive and hostile men.

[ANGELA MERKEL]

And women who are in positions of power even openly celebrate the destruction that they bring upon their people and openly taunt those that seek to retain their culture and civilization from obliteration.

As in the following video of German politician, Dr. Stefanie Von Berg in Hamburg.

[STEPHANIE VON BERG]

“Mrs President, Ladies and Gentlemen. Our societies will change. Our city will change radically. I hold that in 20, 30 years ther will no longer be [German] majorities in our cities. This is what we will have in our future. And I want to make it very clear, especially towards those right wingers, this is a good thing!“

And as our society has become ever more dangerous, because of people like Ms Von Berg, and even though women can take steps to protect themselves, the primary responsibility for protection, will probably always belong to men. This is very important. Women will thus, only have as much freedom as their men are willing or capable of guaranteeing them.

So the question begs. Why do women do this? Why do women betray their in-group? And how is the current situation different from those that preceded it?

[WHY?]

Well, in a word, enfranchisement.

[ENFRANCHISEMENT]

Women have been given the vote and in a democratic society, they vote their biological imperative.

Now what do I mean by this? Well, recent genetic research has shown that before the modern era, eighty percent of women managed to reproduce while only forty percent of men did.

[80% OF WOMEN MANAGED TO REPRODUCE]

[40% OF MEN MANAGED TO REPRODUCE]

The obvious conclusion from this, is that a few top men had access to multiple women while the bottom sixty percent of men had no mating prospects, at all.

Women clearly didn’t mind sharing the top man with a dozen other women, ultimately deciding that being one of many women sharing a man who leads was still more preferable than having the undivided attention of a man who serves.

[ROY F. BAUMEISTER]

Commenting on this Roy Baumeister, a prominent social psychologist who teaches at Florida State University, had this to say:

“It would be shocking if these vastly different reproductive odds for men and women failed to produce some personality differences.“

He went on:

“For women the optimal thing to do is to go along with the crowd, be nice, play it safe. The odds are good that a man will come along and offer sex and you’ll be able to have babies. All that matters is choosing the best offer. We’re descended from women who played it safe.”

“For men the outlook was radically different. If you go along with the crowd and play it safe the odds are you won’t have children. Most men who ever lived, did not have any descendants who are alive today. Their lines were dead ends. Hence. It was necessary to take chances, try new things, be creative, explore other possibilities.”

Many societies, including the last, long ago devised a simple plan to stop the inherent infighting that occurs because a large majority of men in the in-group, don’t have sexual access to women. or the ability to reproduce legitimate children.

[1 PUBLIC WIFE PER MAN]

The entire basis of Western society was the male agreement to keep only one woman in public, so that every male has near equal chance at reproduction.

[GENDER INEQUALITY]

It’s for this reason that organized and advanced civilizations have always needed to agree on the equitable distribution of women, so as to incentivize it’s men to produce and have a stake in the societies health and security.

But this, like other cultural arrangements that help the West together for centuries is breaking down. And can be observed in something as basic as the fact there are no Western countries that are even at replacement levels in their birth rates. This again can be laid at the feet of the loosening of sexual morality and the dating habits of young women.

[80/20]

Colloquially called the “eighty twenty rule“, what it basically means is that the vast majority, the eighty percent, are sexually pursuing the top twenty percent of men. This is highly damaging to the formation of monogamous couples and the successful formation of families and the children that will be the next generation of any given country.

[80/20]

I will be talking about this more later in the video, but if you’re interested see google for more information on this.

Also, one thing to understand is that female psychology has always been about adaptation. In our tribal past if women of conquered tribes didn’t submit to their new masters they faced death along with their husbands, brothers, sons and fathers.

Even today many women seek out aggressive men, whether consciously or not, as it seems that this psychology has been ground into women after countless years of our species evolution. That means criminals and gangsters and mass murderers are always going to be more attractive to women than hard working honest men. They always have been they always will be. Think of how many women throw themselves at drug dealers, versus, for example, math teachers. Sexual attraction is based on this reality for many women, regardless of whether they admit it, or not.

[METROSEXUAL is a portmanteau, derived from metropolitan and sexual, coined in 1994, describing a man (especially one living in an urban post-industrial, capitalist culture) who is especially meticulous about his grooming and appearance, typically spending a significant amount time and money on shopping as part of, … ]

And the feminization of men in the West adhering to the repetitive and decades long diatribe that vilifies anything and all things masculine are no longer, for many women, attractive potential mates.

[theguardian — No excuse for man-bashing  Rebecca Front]

[Male Bashing or Feminism? Are We Not Crossing The Lines Now?]

Especially for women in their critical prime childhood bearing years.

[HOW LONG IS TOO LONG TO WAIT FOR MR. RIGHT?]

But I do add, this may and does change for many, with age.

[Alpha females: you’re chasing the wrong guy  look for a Beta man

Too many successful women are making themselves unhappy by trying to marry men as driven as themselves, according to a new book by Dr Sonya Rhodes]

The culture of the sensitive man, the emotional man, the compassionate man is at odds with what women are biologically predisposed to desire.

[≠]

[√]

[SCOUNDREL]

Young women, if they tell you the truth, are drawn to the scoundrel, not the impeccable gentleman with the perfectly manicured fingernails.

[X]

[GENTLEMAN]

[Video scene from “Star Wars — The Empire Strikes Back” (1980 – TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX]

Leia: Afraid?

Hans Solo: You’re trembling.

Leia: I’m not trembling.

Hans Solo: You like me because I’m a scoundrel. There aren’t enough scoundrels in your life.

Leia: I happen to like nice men.

Hans Solo: I’m a nice man.

Leia: No you’re not, you’re, … ah, umm, an, … (they start kissing each other).

It’s so much a part of women psyche to want the scoundrel, that it’s wrapped up in their very DNA.

[What if my body had a sexual response during rape?]

Just to get this out of the way, because I have a feeling it might show up in the comments, …

[MSNBC: More than 87% of woman experience orgasm during RAPE]

Yes, I am aware that the vast majority of women when raped reach sexual climax, or orgasm. However from all the science that’s been done this is just basically a hardwired response.

[WHAT SCIENCE SAYS ABOUT AROUSAL DURING RAPE — YES ORGASMS CAN HAPPEN TO RAPE VICTIMS]

That if it does have an effect on women and their judgment, it must do so at a very subconscious or primal level.

[Rape, Fantasies, and Female Arousal]

I also know that the number one sexual fantasy disclosed by women, over and over again, is rape fantasy, forced sex fantasy.

[MR. GREY WILL SEE YOU NOW]

But fantasy and reality are two different things. So I’m not really going to count this as a reason why women are so prone to consciously betray their in-group.

The half-century-long experiment of women’s liberation and political enfranchisement has ended in disaster for the West. When you begin to start connecting the dots you realize that since women have been given the vote the entire center of politics and thus Western society, has shifted ever more to the left.

[FREE ABORTION ON DEMAN WITH APOLOGY]

Women have also used their political enfranchisement to further the cause of the, aptly named, “Women’s Liberation“.

[SOCIAL LIBERATION]

[FINANCIAL LIBERATION]

[FAMILIAL LIBERATION]

[MOTHERHOOD LIBERATION]

[RELIGIOUS LIBERATION]

Liberation socially, liberation financially, liberation from family, from motherhood. Liberation from religious dogma and most importantly, sexual liberation.

Once women were given equal say in the sphere of politics it was only a matter of time until our civilization was swept up by the event horizon of its own collapse.

[TIME MAGAZINE: THE DECLINE AND FALL OF EUROPE — AND MAYBE THE WEST]

All kinds of studies have been done on the subject. As this one from Columbia University.

[WHY HAVE WOMEN BECOME LEFT-WING? THE POLITICAL GENDER GAP AND THE DECLINE IN MARRIAGE]

[We trace this development to the decline in marriage]

And they all without exception, note, that as women become more, quote, unquote, “emancipated” the decline of the family is further accelerated.

[Why Do Women Vote Differently Than Men?]

And as the family disintegrates and women move politically further and further to the left in their voting, many then begin to use the government as a surrogate husband and provider.

[Women Today Have a New Husband — Today, more and more women are abandoning men for a new husband who does a better job taking care of them as providers and protectors. The new husband, of course, is the government. Jan 19, 2016]

Women are thus, even more liberated from their traditional roles within the family and society at large.

[Nearly one in four lone parents depend solely on welfare]

In one of the most comprehensive studies of civilizational decline, J. D. Unwin postulates in his book, “Sex and Culture” written in 1934, that the main driver for the rise of a civilization is the degree of chastity of the said civilizations’ women.

[Joseph Daniel Unwin (1895 – 1936)]

Unwin, a British social anthropologist at Oxford and Cambridge universities, studied eighty six different cultures through five thousand years of history and found a positive correlation between the cultural achievement of a people and the sexual restraint they observed.

[SIGMUND FRAUD]

Unwin’s impetus for the project was to test the Freudian theory that civilizational progress was the product of repressed sexuality. He found that discipline in sexual matters apropriated social energy to more civilizational ends.

It’s very complicated, but for Unwin the fabric of society was primarily sexual and heterosexual monogamy was the optimal arrangement for the planning, building, protecting and nurturing of the family. If enough heterosexual partners made a monogamous commitment, civilizational energy was directed toward promoting the finest societal foundation possible.

Without exception, each civilization he studied allowed its success to alter its moral code. According to Unwin, after a nation becomes increasingly liberal, with regards to its sexual morality, it loses its cohesion, its impetus and its purpose.

[EXPANSIVE ENERGY]

From a chaste moral code society’s gain what he called, “expansive energy“. And this energy allowed these cultures to expand into other weaker cultures.

Now when you compare the modern Western world with the Islamic one you see exactly the results that Unwin’s theory would predict. By allowing women to “fuck freely” the West has defacto entered a matriarchy that dis-incentivizes young men.

Islam on the other hand, keeps their women chaste and their expansive energy as Unwin’s theory predicts is manifested in what we’re observing today. The Islamic culture is the one who’s expanding into the West And it was only recently that the West was able to dominate all other cultures on the planet.

Ultimately, each civilization became less cohesive, less aggressive and less resolute. Civilizations in this liminal [a transitional or initial stage of a process] phase then collapsed from either, (a) an internal anarchic revolution or, (b) conquest by invaders with greater social energy.

[(MUSLIM PROTESTER PLACARDS): SLAY THOSE WHO INSULT ISLAM — EUROPE WILL PAY. DEMOLITION IS ON ITS WAY! — BEHEAD THOSE WHO INSULT ISLAM — BUTCHER THOSE WHO MOCK ISLAM]

Terrifyingly, Unwin also noted that there was no case in any of the studies he’d made in which a culture managed to restrict the sexual freedom of women, once they’ve been loosened.

[(WHITE WOMEN HOLDING A SIGN) I’M HOLDING A PIECE OF PAPER WITH SOMETHING WRITTEN ON IT.]

[(A FAT FEMI-NAZI LESBIAN WITH SIGN): NO, YOU MAKE ME A SANDWICH!!]

A “feminist society and future” is an oxymoron, as it’s unsustainable in the long run. Based just on past history, a civilization that embraces feminist values will cease to exist in a very short time. This is why we’ve never seen a feminist civilization, aside from very short spans, at the end of great empires.

15:00

The size of decline are already observable. While many countries are sliding into social decline, the canary in the coal mine is the self described humanitarian superpower that pursues a feminist foreign policy.

[Government Offices of Sweden

Feminist foreign policy

Equality between women and men is a fundamental aim of Swedish foreign policy. Ensuring that women and girls can enjoy their fundamental human rights is both a duty within the framework of our international commitments, and a prerequisite for reaching Sweden’s broader foreign policy goals on peace, and security and sustainable development.]

When looking at Sweden it’s one of the most gender equal countries on Earth.

[Shocking: Sweden is now the RAPE capital of the West. Here’s why…

Written by Ashley Edwardson on October 28, 2015]

[SWEDISH NEWS SITE EDITOR: FLOOD COUNTRY WITH ISIS SO ANTI-IMMIGRANT SWEDES ARE EXILED]

And while they’ve become the rape capital of Europe, they are flushing their culture and country down the toilet and pressing forward in their civilisational suicide at an ever accelerating pace!

[‘Sweden Will Become a Third World Country by 2030’—  UN]

[Soviet Sweden? Model Nation Sliding to Third World

— 09-08-2014 — Dale Hurd]

The total and complete feminization of Sweden and its men have allowed their women to invite their country’s own destruction through the importation of millions of unassimilatable and aggressive people from completely alien cultures.

[Sweden to set up border controls for migrants

Swedish authorities plan to impose temporary border controls to help the country cope with”record” numbers of refugees the interior minister says. The minister has also urged EU countries to take “responsibility.”]

[Sweden to borrow money to cover cost of immigration

Infowars – Tuesday 15th September, 2015

The Swedish Minister for Finance, Magdalena Andersson, now considers borrowing large amounts of money from the European Investment Bank to increase immigration to Sweden …]

Not only are they borrowing money to fund the colonization of their country, but they are now even creating gender imbalances that will have severe and lasting repercussions on their societies future.

[Mass migration gives Sweden male gender imbalance worse than China

Posted by fuzzy Slippers  Saturday, January 30, 2016 at 12:30pm]

And they await their doom with smiles of tolerance and passivity, calm as Hindu cows.

Looking again at Unwin’s work, he leaves us with a stark dilemma. It may not be possible to save the West. According to his model this process is irreversible. And the only way to do so would be to restrict the sexual freedom of Western women and move back to a more patriarchal society. And as things stand, this is probably an impossibility.

So, instead of, “having it all” Western women risk losing everything!

What are liberal feminists going to do when faced with aggressive gangs of migrants bent on theft and sexual violence? Burn their bras and throw a pocket edition of, “Cunt — A Declaration of Independence” at them?

[(Book cover): cunt — a declaration of independence]

The violence now being directed toward Western women in their own countries is undeniable proof of the breakdown of the leftist utopian ideals for society. The million migrants that have already arrived, and the millions on their way, already understand that the West is a toothless civilization ripe for plunder.

[(Smiling woman with sign): WILL TRADE RACISTS FOR RAPISTS]

While Western women might be the ones advocating, whether knowingly or not, for the destruction of the West via misplaced compassion and hyper emotionalism, it’s also the fault of Western men by giving them the choice and allowing their gender’s particular predilections to dictate what our civilization’s values, priorities and ultimately what our future, should and will be.

[VALUES]

[PRIORITIES]

[FUTURE]

And maybe Unwin is right. Maybe there is no peaceful way to resolve this crisis of our civilization.

Our feminized society hasn’t built an equality rainbow that will usher the West into a nirvana of peace and security, based on mutual respect and tolerance. No! It has succeeded in paving the way for the takeover and. Islamization of the West.

[(MUSLIM PROTESTER PLACARDS): SHARIAH FOR THE NETHERLANDS ISLAM WILL BE SUPERIOR — ISLAM WILL DOMINATE THE WORLD FREEDOM CAN GO TO HELL]

[(MUSLIM PROTESTER PLACARDS): DEATH TO FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY]

Ironically, it will be feminine tendencies and policies that rule our society, if not kept in check, that will bring down the more gender inclusive states of the West and replace them with the tribalism of Africa and the Middle East, and the hyper masculinity of Islam.

[(MUSLIM PROTESTER PLACARDS): DAVID CAMERON ENEMY OF ISLAM AND MUSLIMS — SHARIAH WILL DOMINATE THE WORLD — UK, US AND FRANCE TYRANT REGIMES ALL ARAB LEADERS]

[(MUSLIM PROTESTER PLACARDS): NIQAAB FUTURE BRITAIN]

You can have a feminized society, but it won’t survive Islam.

[WESTERN MEN HAVE GIVEN

WESTERN WOMEN FREEDOM OF WILL

AND CHOICE IN THEIR SOCIETY]

And here’s the crimson red pill of this video — Western men have given Western women, freedom of will and choice in their own society. And western women are now choosing who will take it away from them.

[AND WESTERN WOMEN

ARE NOW CHOOSING WHO

WILL TAKE IT AWAY FROM THEM]

[ If this kind of material resonates with you, please click, “Like”. And even better, if you’d like to see more of this kind of material, please click the “Subscribe” button.]

END

======================================

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

Click to download a PDF of this post (Text Only) (x.x MB):

Version History

Version 7: Oct 17, 2016  — Updated YouTube stats.

Version 6: Feb 26, 2016  — Updated my Introductory Comment (Ver 5).

Version 5: Feb 25, 2016  — Added screen text captions for remainder of text. Updated my Introductory Comment (Ver 4).

Version 4: Feb 23, 2016  — Added screen text captions for [05:00] to [10:00] text.

Version 3: Feb 22, 2016  — Added screen text captions for [00:00] to [04:55] text.

Version 2: Feb 19, 2016  — Proofread text.

TRANSCRIPT — TEXT ONLY

Duke: The head of the Anti-Defamation League, the aDL, is Jonathan Greenblatt. He recently condemned famous musician and gun rights activist Ted Nugent, for daring to say:

“Who is really leading the push to take away American Constitutional gun rights?”

I will quote Greenblatt directly:

Greenblatt:

“Nugent shared a graphic titled, ‘So who is really behind gun control’ on his Facebook page. The visual featured thumbnail photos of prominent Jewish Americans, including former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Senator Chuck Schumer, Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, and several others. With each photo. And blazoned. With the Israeli flag.”

Duke: Greenblatt, of course, could not refute any of this. He just called Nugent an, “anti-Semite” for daring to tell the truth. Every name Greenblatt mentions is a leading gun control advocate. And as far as the Israeli flag, all of them are dedicated Zionist jews, one hundred percent committed to Israel. Which by the way, allows its citizens to carry submachine guns if they want — while they oppose gun rights for American citizens.

Michael Bloomberg gave over fifty million dollars in efforts to take away your gun rights. Jewish Zionist extremist Senator Chuck E. Schumer, along with Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein and Carl Levin, before his retirement, were the driving force behind taking your guns in the Senate. So give them all Israeli flags!

Carl Levin, by the way, was head of the Armed Services Committee where he made sure Israel got many of our most secret weapons. Secrets, by the way, that Israel then sold for tidy sums to China. So give him a big Israeli flag too! The exceedingly Jewish Mayor Rahm Emanuel is a big gun control advocate. But at least he’s a veteran. However he didn’t serve in the American army. He served in the Israeli army and swore his allegiance to that foreign nation, not America. So give him a big. Israeli flag too. Oh well.

Gun activist Alan Dershowitz, a gun control advocate for America as well as being the most famous torture advocate in the world. Well, he’s a bit distracted right now by child rape allegations from his four visits to the Zionist Jeffrey Epstein sex island. So give him an Israeli flag too! And please add a prison sentence for child rape.

So thanks Mr Greenblatt, for calling attention to the fact that Ted’s graphic showed all these characters with the Israeli flag. I should note that Chucky boy Schumer cozied up to his chosen cousin Amy Schumer, to do a big anti-gun presentation. Now I don’t know why they choose Amy Schumer to promote gun control. After all, she is a self promoted image as the nastiest crudest most disgusting slut whore in the history of the known world. You know what I saw in a short video from the film, Trainwreck [2015]? I found it hard to believe that such an insanely repugnant human being could even exist. Then I found out that she was a blood relative to Chuckie Schumer. And then I understood completely why she is so vile. I guess we will find out of political satire is only allowed for mensches*, like Jon Stewart Leibowitz.

*[“Mensch” is a Yiddish word that describes a person of integrity. Being used here sarcastically.]

Mr Greenblatt goes on to say, and listen close to this one folks. He accuses Ted Nugent of, quote:

“Making the outrageous suggestion that Jews are behind gun control, is nothing short of conspiratorial anti-Semitism!”

It is, quote:

“Completely divorced from reality!”

Really Mr Greenblatt? Where would Ted Nugent or anyone else for that matter get the outrageous idea that Jewish organizations and. Jews in media are leading the push for gun control? Well let’s see. The leading Jewish newspaper in America is the Jewish Daily Forward. Read the headline folks, quote:

“Jews lead renewed push on guns.”

Here’s a respected Jewish Telegraph Agency:

“Jewish groups push for action on gun control.”

Here is one of the leading news sites of Israel, TheTimes of Israel. Read the headline folks. Quote:

“Jewish politicians lead chorus for tighter gun laws.”

And the height of hypocrisy, after Ted Nugent statement, The Times of Israel headlined:

“Jewish groups blasted Nugent for anti-semitic gun control post!”

 I guess he’s been condemned because he’s a gentile saying what Jews can brag about. So if what Ted Nugent said is anti-semitic than the Times and those Jewish publications, they must be as anti-semitic as hell!

Mr Greenblatt, if truth is anti-semitic, then liars like you are in big trouble. In fact, your own organization itself boasted of its dedicated leadership in fighting for gun control! Your own aDL brags about its powerful record against gun rights for Americans.

Here’s a headline from your publication eighteen years before Nugent made a statement, quote:

“aDL reaffirms support for gun control initiatives.”

In the article,it affirms that this powerful international Jewish organization has been working since 1967 to quote:

“Support gun control measures on both the state and federal level.”

That goes back to 1967. Now that’s longer than any gun control, major anti-gun organization in America. In fact mega-funded, well-funded, Jewish groups like the aDL, the American Jewish Committee and the American Jewish Congress were leading efforts to destroy the Second Amendment, even before any major organizations were founded exclusively for that purpose.

Look at an article titled, “Leading gun control advocacy groups the United States.” The aDL has been opposing guns longer than any of the leading organizations exclusively devoted to gun control. And that includes groups like, Stop Gun Violence by director Josh Horowitz, which is a coalition of forty seven separate organizations which was founded in 1974. aDL is older, and way older, in terms of its anti-gun fight than Bloomberg’s, “Everytown”.*

* [Everytown for Gun Safety is an American nonprofit organization which advocates for gun control. Everytown was founded in 2014, combining Mayors Against Illegal Guns and Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America.]

Mr Greenblatt’s own organization proves he’s a damn liar when he said it’s outrageous to say that Jewish groups led the gun control efforts. The truth is their paramount role is undeniable. And also we should not forget the paramount role they have, and media, which is a constant parade of anti-gun propaganda and lies.

What’s outrageous is that a tribe of two percent of the American people can have so much power over the ninety eight percent of the rest of us. So, Mr Greenblatt, thank goodness for the Internet. So your hypocrisy and lies can be exposed to the whole world.

If Nugent is an anti-semite for telling the truth and so are you and all the leading Jewish media organizations that boast of your own leading role. And the same thing is true about your role in supporting the massive immigration that’s destroying America and Europe. Interestingly enough, at the same time you support Israel, which doesn’t allow any of it in their country.

I will now share with you, Nugent’s powerful words after he revealed the real leaders of the gun control movement, quote:

“Know these punks! They hate freedom! They hate good over evil! They would deny us the basic human right to self-defense and to keep and bear arms, while many of them are have armed security. Know them well. Tell everyone you know how evil they are!”

You were right, Ted. They are the epitome of evil. And they’re doing a lot more than simply moving to take away our guns. They’re trying to destroy our heritage. They’re also behind the immigration meant to make us a helpless political minority in the nation that our own forefathers created! And if that happens, all of our rights will be taken away. Not only take away our guns, they’ll take away even the right to our own very existence!

But we are awakening and rising! If you stay strong, Mr Nugent you’ll bring more people by your side than ever before in your entire lifetime. You’ll have more fans than ever before and your venues will overflow across America just like Trump’s. Just don’t back down! And don’t stop telling the forbidden truths and you, along with all of us, will ride a tsunami to victory!

God bless you!

END

======================================

Click to download a PDF of this post (8.0 MB):

Ted Nugent vs the ADL — Who is Behind Gun Control? — TRANSCRIPT

Click to download a PDF of this post (Text Only) (0.7 MB):

Ted Nugent vs the ADL — Who is Behind Gun Control? — TRANSCRIPT (Text Only)

Version History