Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT

Woes: Hello. And welcome back to Millenniyule 2021. I’m here now with a guest who’s hasn’t appeared before, but I think he’s a very interesting guy. He is called Marc Malone. Marc, welcome to Millenniyule! Would you like to introduce yourself?

 

Marc Malone: Yeah. Thanks for having me mate. I appreciate it so I basically run an organization called America 21. I’m from England. But I live in America now. I live in Arizona. The organization seeks to undo UN initiatives in particular Global Governance. And we will talk about why that’s obviously very important. So most people obviously think of a New World Order, they understand that there is this agenda. But my organization actually seeks to undo that the political level.

 

I’ve worked in data science. I’ve worked in linguistic analysis. And I’ve actually been studying Philosophy of Science at Oxford Online. I have a pretty broad experience when it comes to scientific processes and understanding behaviour analysis. I also work a lot in the tech world as well.

 

I’ve also been a musician [chuckling]! Funny enough, I wanted to be a musician, but the pricks won’t let me do it, because they keep throttling us at every step. So we can talk about that, as well.

 

So that’s basically my mission. My mission is to undo that, to free us up from technocracy. Then we can have our petty squabbles about politics, whatever they may be the ones that we used to have in 2019. But until we peel back what is happening. And, by the way, it’s nowhere near where it’s going to end right now. I see no validity in having no squabbles. So my focus is purely on the issue at hand. Which is peeling back global governance.

 

 

Woes: Okay. Now there are several videos on your YouTube channel that people should, I watched, and I think that people should go and familiarize themselves with that, afterwards. And from that I wrote the following introduction, which I’m going to rather stiltedly read out now as an entree into this discussion.

 

So I want you to describe your perception of what is going on. And that’s very broad strokes. But I think that’s generally what people expect from my channel. Now, most people think of what has been going on over the last two years as follows.

 

The governments of the world are reacting to a pandemic, a respiratory virus similar to the flu, but much more deadly. In combating this pandemic the governments of the world have tried various things; lockdowns, mask wearing, social distancing, and mRNA vaccines – which have been developed rapidly by experts. And if everyone gets the vaccine, and yearly booster shots, then the governments of the world are confident that we will defeat this pandemic, if not entirely eradicate the virus. We’ll at least defeat the pandemic. That’s the mainstream view of what’s going on. What we’re supposed to believe. And what’s been going on over the last two years.

 

Now some people will also have heard of the Great Reset. And they might think of that as a bunch of movers and shakers, Klaus Schwab types who have some ideas about how society could work better in the future. They might have quite a benign view of that it’s just visionaries, dreamers, futurologists, coming up with ideas for improving society. And that these ideas have been spurred on, or these thinkers have been spurred on in that project by witnessing the catastrophe of the pandemic. And so they’ve seen this as:

 

“Okay, we obviously need to really rebalance, re-streamline how the world works. So that such a catastrophe can never strike again.”

 

So I’ve outlined there, the mainstream narrative. And what some people might well think about the Great Reset. That it’s also benign.

 

So, Mark what in your view is really going on? Can you give me a improvised answer to that? And then we’ll get into the individual points that you want to cover.

 

Marc Malone: Sure. Well, we have to think of premises here. So this is a useful philosophical way, scientific way, to look at a situation. If you start from a false premise then it doesn’t matter how good the following premises are, because you’ve begun from a false presence, right.

 

So if we begin from the premise that the State. And by the State I don’t just mean the government. I mean, the State as in the oligarchy. So that includes the corporations, medical system, the climate system, yadda, yadda, right? Everything! So let’s just call that “State”, for brevity’s sake.

 

If you start from the premise that the State has your best interest at heart, you’re going to no matter how many good premises you create before you find the conclusion at the other side. They’re going to be incorrect! Because your first premise is incorrect!

 

Let me give an example. So:

 

“The government are trying to do their best.”

 

Would be my first faulty premise.:

 

“But they miscalculated the pandemic. Now, they’re trying to play catch up. Now it’s got out of hand, yada, yada!”

 

Well those are all false. Because the first one is false, so, ….

 

[05:15]

 

Woes: Exactly! And I’ve seen people say:

 

“Oh! There’s such incompetence in the government! Oh! It’s so annoying that they haven’t sorted this out yet!”

 

Marc Malone: Right, yeah, so you start from the wrong premise. So you have to start from the proper premise. And the proper premise in this case is you’re dealing with a predator! Think of it this way. Think if you are going to a forest. [chuckling] And you want to camp. You want to maybe you want to set up, I don’t know, maybe you want to live there. Maybe we will have to, at this rate. But let’s just say you want to live in the forest, or camp in the forest. If you take the premise that especially out here, because we have a lot of bears and stuff out here, a lot of wooded area in, you know, rural America. So if I take the premise that:

 

“The bear really wants to be my friend.”

 

Well, I’m not going to be very good at preparing for the bear, right? I’m going to think:

 

“Bears just want to be my friend, bro!”

 

I mean, they’re cuddly, they’re great, they’re friends of ours, right? Like maybe I’ll just set up, and just hope for the best. Well then, of course, what I’m going to do is, I’m going to put myself in a very jeopardized situation. Because what’s going to happen, of course, is the bear if it finds me is going to turn me to pieces.

 

So we have to approach it the same way with the State and with this pandemic situation. You cannot begin from a false premise! Like you’re not dealing with a predator. You’re dealing with a predator! So, …

 

Woes: The word predator, it’s a very interesting word, because I associate that with sociopaths, psychopaths, you know, people who pray on other people. On normal people. Yeah, I don’t know if you’d have anything to say about that. Because I think you do have experience, and expertise, in that sort of area general.

 

Marc Malone: Behaviour analysis, yeah. Not so much in predators, or psychopaths. But we can certainly get into that. Because that’s important. But yeah, psychopaths. I prefer to use the term “predator”, because it’s more I guess carnal, and it goes across boundaries. And in this case when you understand that’s the premise, when you take everything else they’ve done from March 2020 onwards, everything makes sense!

 

Woes: Okay. So then, what do you mean by a “predator”?

 

Marc Malone: I do mean psychopathy. I mean, it depends how deep you want to take that, right? On a material level I mean, psychopathy. On an immaterial level, I mean, demonic. So it depends on which place you want to go with that. But and we can take it there. But let’s stick with psychopathic for now. We’ll go with that.

 

So these are psychopathic people, premise one! Therefore they have no regard for you, or for what you want out of life, premise two. The conclusion is then they are out to get what they want out of life, out of society. That’s the conclusion that you find. When you understand that everything makes sense.

 

I mean, in March 2020 I was creating content. I have YouTube videos that I posted on my Facebook, which was deleted. I don’t have that up. But I reposted some of them to YouTube, in March and April, 2020, talking about that this was economic and then Social Credit system implementation. And people were like:

 

“Man! Mark’s fucking crazy!”

 

How did I see that coming in March of 2020? Because I understood what the premise was. I understood I wasn’t dealing with rational normal people! You’re dealing with rational, evil people! But not rational, normal people.

 

So in this case you just follow that through. So that’s how we got where we are today. And it’s very important, and we do this in all sorts of philosophy territory, including scientific territory, of course. Mathematics, as well. If you can start from the correct premise it’s very easy to then follow the steps to the conclusion. But if you do not start from the correct one, you will never get to the correct conclusion! That’s why I always really push people on this and say:

 

“You must drop the idea that you’re dealing with people like you! They’re not like you!”

 

Woes: Yeah. And I think that a lot of people, … One of the key things that they find difficult to grasp about rulers that they’re the – at least the present rulers – is the nature of power and power seeking. I think most people don’t really care about power seeking. It’s not something that they want to do in their lives. They have no interest in it. And so they can’t understand how someone else could be motivated by the desire for power. And then, they can’t understand that people will do things for no other reason than to advance their own agenda, their own power agenda.

 

Marc Malone: Yeah.

 

Woes: So it’s something, because you see people just failing to understand. For example, like I would say – this is my own pet theory, you might disagree with it. I’m not insinuating that you agree with this.

 

One of my own theories is that everything, the vaccines, the lockdown, and especially the mask wearing, and social distancing, all of these have psychological effects. As much as they have any other effect, they have psychological effects! With the masks. One of those psychological effects is submission! It’s degrading! It’s humiliating! Now. If you say that to a normal person, and I guess an ordinary average normie, they will say:

 

“But why on earth would they want to do that to us? Why on earth, those in government and whatever, global organizations, why would they want to humiliate and degrade us?”

 

Now I would say, because that helps them to exert power over us.

 

Marc Malone: Right.

 

Woes: But that is an alien concept to most people.

 

Marc Malone: Sure. Yeah, you’re right.

 

Woes: It’s a way that most people are not accustomed to thinking. And I’m not accustomed to thinking. [chuckling] And I don’t like it! But it seems to be very relevant to what’s going on, because everything, as I say, all of these things that are required of us now, the social distancing, it’s conditioning us! Now obviously we’ll get into that in a while. But can we return to so the mainstream narrative. The perception of what’s going on:

 

“The governments of the world are reacting to a pandemic.”

 

What would you say about that?

 

[11:15]

 

 

 

Marc Malone: Well if they were reacting to a pandemic how did I predict two years in advance in March 2020 my profit am I psychic. I mean, this is so there’s only three there’s only three answers to this I’m either a prophet I’m either psychic, or I just understand that this is a script playing now. It has to be one of the three. Because no matter how high an IQ you have. And I have one about 145, there’s no way you can still plan out to that kind of accuracy so you pick. But it’s obviously a script. And I can cite tons of literature. I mean, I’ve got their own books. Fourth Industrial Revolution by Klaus Schwab. Memoirs by David Rockefeller. America between two ages by Zbigniew Brzezinski. The Grand Chessboard by Zbigniew Brzezinski. Dialectical Imagination by the Frankfurt School. New Order of B genuine that’s not stoparbarians by people like Dr Richard day and planned parenthood and University of Pittsburgh in 1969 I could go on. These are their books right! These aren’t David Ike books! These aren’t Alex Jones books these are their books their material stuff that they have written and put out it’s in their own literature.

 

Woes: This is something that a lot of people just are baffled by that. Well, if you’re gonna plan something out then obviously you’re gonna do it in a dark smoky room it’s gonna be very secretive but no actually they’re completely up front about it sure the stuff they’re talking like Klaus Schwabian with the transhumanism nanotech cybernetic implants and all this he said it. I mean, it’s not some someone some paranoid guy has dreamt this up it’s they have said it themselves.

 

Marc Malone: Long before this stuff happened which is how we know that there’s a string that binds us together. We’ll get into that what that string really is when we talk about Agenda 21 later. Because that’s the most important thing about this whole thing, but the literature proves this, because they’ve discussed this stuff before they’ve discussed mandatory vaccinations in this literature they’ve discussed breaking up nations and making them regions they’ve been doing this for decades they’re talking about the end of the nation states talking about the end of culture and the end of most importantly religion in the Western world in particular. They discuss all of this they understand that to break a people you must break first a sense of inherent transcendence which is god. Break the god break the family unit break the culture make them into regions and centralize power globally it’s that simple. Five steps. And it’s all in most of their books Dr Richard day in the new order of barbarian said in 1969 University of Pittsburgh, as I said, high up in planned parenthood we’re going to make men and women. The same we’re going to promote homosexuality we’re going to downgrade Christianity. We’re going to yada yada it’s on and on 69.

 

Woes: Yeah. And I remember all this promote contraception from homosexuality promote yeah promiscuity. As well, I believe and downgrade downgrade the Church in people’s lives. And so on, and it’s staggering. When you see the list of things that he made there. So okay so the overall thing most people think the governments of the world are reacting to a pandemic a virus similar to the flu in combating this they’ve tried various things lockdowns, etc., etc., which have been developed and a vaccine that’s been developed and they’re confident that we will defeat this pandemic. And that’s what’s going on? Obviously you would say that is a complete tissue of lies all of every stage of that is a lie. So and what they’re actually doing is implementing well a new social paradigm would you say that’s an accurate way to.

 

Marc Malone: So I guess if we go to what the world view of the room class is [15:01] we look at let’s. Look at how they think so are they psychopaths yes that’s true but many people are psychopaths around one percent of population supposedly right so, but not everyone’s.

 

Woes: Probably a bit more than that to be honest.

 

Marc Malone: Well they say it’s one percent that are psychopaths about four percent that are sociopaths. And. It’s just a shy a bit above that are narcissists right. But yeah,

 

Woes: That’s more plausible. Yeah,

 

Marc Malone: But the important part is here is that if we look at yes they’re psychopaths that they have a specific world view and their world view is that they want to reshape man reshape humanity in their image right. So when I say that they’re Luciferians a lot of people kind of get the back up and go well that’s all that sort of Christian stuff that’s all sort of that’s all like religion hocus pocus. I’m like no. But even if you believe that’s fine I’m not talking about it religiously I’m talking about a philosophy here. In a similar way to how you may believe in the nuclear family does that make you a question. Well, that’s a Christian idea does that mean that you’re Christian no but it means that you’re playing out a part of a Christian framework regardless of whether you believe in it, or not. Similarly let’s just take it for that parentheses look at that as a philosophy not as a metaphysical fact really important that you do this. Because in that philosophy they believe that they are god. Now this is really important, because you and most normal people do not believe that we are god. Even if you don’t believe in god you don’t believe your god right you don’t believe that you get to control nature. I mean, I know a lot of guys who don’t believe in god. But they understand that nature is more powerful than them right. I mean, yes we all sort of understand this right we all sort of understand that nature has a certain power. The way that I would look at it is nature is just one expression of god’s voice. But regardless right let’s just say you believe as nature as the is the endpoints that we can understand that’s fine in that case they still believe that that nature is subordinate to them not the other way around.

 

So when you have that worldview when you have the worldview that you are god there really is no limit to what you could do right?

 

Woes: Yeah I can’t even imagine how, of course, I can’t even imagine having that attitude that the notion in my head that nature is subordinate to me it just seems incredible I mean, how would someone. Well, I guess this is psychopathy. I mean, if they are that massively predatory and egotistical in a way, or just calculating then I guess they would perceive everything as just an object as an instrument to be manipulated and that would even include the systems and grandeur of nature itself.

 

Marc Malone: And reshaping trying to make everybody the same trying to make everybody believe the same things and act the same way right. And it’s like oh no, you know, I’m not a [], right? Like I don’t have those belief systems. I don’t I have nothing against those people in their way their thing providing that they’re not like doing hurting children and the important stuff right. But as far as like their daily rituals, you know, knock yourself out right. But I’m not me and that that can never be me that can never be you. But that’s I don’t come from 2,000 years of Islamic civilization right. So but if you believe that you’re god you believe that it’s within your power to reshape things in there whichever way you want to reshape it, right? And this is very this is very prevalent in the writings of like George Soros and David Rockefeller in particular where they really believe it’s their mission to reshape humanity.

 

Woes: Yeah isn’t there a quote from David Rockefeller about how he says that basically all the myths about the illumi not the illuminate the builder burgers that it’s something that:

 

“People think that we plot about how to redesign the world. We do!”

 

Yeah, it’s something to that effect.

 

Marc Malone: Page 406, I think, from his memoirs. Yeah where he says we’ve been people populists he says this was written in 2003, by the way. So he was ahead of the curve on this one he said like our populists and conservatives and nationalists, you know, say that me. And my family are part of an international group who want to who want to kind of push power more globally. And if that’s why what I’m charged of I say I’m guilty right so he’s admitting it that’s exactly it but so their view is that right debut reshape man, because they view nature god as a dictator they view nature as a dictator they view. This idea that we have an inherent piece of ourselves that can’t be recreated by them. And therefore it creates this difference this thing that’s outside of their control. And they find that quite despicable. So they want control of that right they say no nothing is outside of our control. This is our world right and that man in the sky you believe in these natural [20:00] laws that you believe in the hocus pocus. And we’re going to prove it with our science we’re going to become trans human we’re going to become connected to the great we’re going to become omnipresent omniscient we’re going to become gods. So that’s the premise when you understand that everything makes sense. No amount of destruction that you cause would matter right everything’s justified.

 

Woes: Yeah I remember one story about the early on in the vaccine programs there was a thing I don’t know if this was genuine, or not I’m not I don’t want people to assume that. But there was a quote from someone who just they it got vaccinated. And he was saying they’ve killed god I can’t feel god anymore. And that was a very eerie scary story and, as I said, I don’t know if it’s true, or not, but it would certainly match with what you’re saying here that they’re effectively altering humanity so that it is more under their control, or they’re transforming a fairly independent species, or at least one that has the potential for freedom.

 

Marc Malone: Right.

 

Woes: Into a much more bovine species that doesn’t even have an interest in freedom.

 

Marc Malone: Yes and I guess that takes us nicely into the other thing we’re going to talk about right which is how they create the conditions of trauma to reshape the human population.

 

Woes: Well I’ve got five points here the philosophy of the world of world view of the ruling class the psychology of the masses who follow them. So yes, that would fit into this. So yes, go into that.

 

Marc Malone: So now we know the premise let’s move into action time. So they want to act on a premise well they’ve been doing this for really for a long time for decades and I explained some of the ways that they’ve done that. But I’m sure many other people on your show have talked about those so we don’t need to go into that today let’s stick with March 2020 and why this sped up and how it’s sped up. So generally speaking when you create a condition of trauma it puts the brain in a malleable state what I mean, by malleable is this thing called neuroplasticity.

 

Woes: Sorry first can you define trauma.

 

Marc Malone: Yeah. So there’s many different ways you can think of trauma I’m as I’m a philosopher and not a psychologist I’d rather explain it on a epistemic level what I mean, by epidemic is a knowledge level not a behavioural level. On a knowledge level what trauma really is that your world basically moves from harmony into chaos, or rather order into disorder right so suddenly the world makes sense. And you could car crashes death of someone you love, you know, loss of perhaps a career you love can kind of create these things. But when it’s on mass it’s much deeper, because you’re getting the collective trauma of everybody at the same time.

 

Woes: So the world at the end of 2019 wasn’t utopia let’s be honest but it made sense to most people it had basically been the same for decades many decades and everyone was familiar with it and everyone knew how to get by in that world everyone knew how to get ahead in that world how to navigate it and then March 2020 happens.

 

Marc Malone: Yeah. And look. I mean, I would rip your arm off for the 2019 problems now, you know, sure we had problems. But do you think those problems just seem so trivial now, because yes we had like work stuff all of that yeah, of course, it was all horrible obviously. But I mean, it was almost comical to some degree it wasn’t like get this lethal injection, or you can’t leave your fucking house. It certainly wasn’t that. So there was order we moved into disorder. So that’s kind of what trauma is in this sense right so you’ve created you’ve broken down the view of the world literally you view the world in spatially and temporally you view it in a way that makes sense to time and space so you go oh yeah things just make sense they broke that down now there really was no world that made sense in time and space it’s like I have no idea what I’m doing tomorrow I have no idea if. I’m going to survive I have no idea if the economy is going to survive nothing makes sense anymore. Now in that period in that six week period I actually take about eight weeks 60 days only takes 60 days to do this reconditioning so by mid-may first of June 2020 this reconditioning was complete right and that’s very, very important to understand it takes only 60 days to do this.

 

Woes: So that’s from mid march to mid-march to the end to the mid-may. And so by the first of June how did humanity differ from the human the public the general public. And at the start of March.

 

Marc Malone: Well I think we’ll, you know, it’s obvious right. But we do.

 

Woes: I know. But I want it nailed down just for clarity.

 

[25:00]

 

Marc Malone: Okay okay. So there are fundamental ways the obvious ways the obvious ways and the perhaps the most problematic would be the human distance right. So your entire life and perhaps your entire civilizational history right perhaps since the black plague there was a sense of closeness with people there was a sense of you like when you meet a friend you give them a hug shake your hand whatever right that had been completely reconditioned. And that was perhaps the biggest problem, because now you’re conditioned to create space. And, of course, to not be close to people even those that you love. And those that you care about.

 

Woes: But there were some horror stories about that with people visiting their elderly relatives and care homes and that kind of its really sick.

 

Marc Malone: Yeah, it is torture and I would like to come back to the mask part I want to talk about the mass thing separately to piggyback off the torture thing that you’re just mentioning. But so there’s separation. But there’s also just the complete disappearance of a routine so now you’re now you’re working from home now you can’t obviously go into a store without a mask on yada yada. So what happened is your old world had broken down. And now they’ve rebuilt a new one and as you’re kind of happy with that new one now, because at least you have some sense of belonging and this goes to the video that I made in about cult induction. If you want to get in. If you want to get into that I can speed through it. But essentially that was what we were witnessing in March 2020 was sort of the breakdown of your we were like our civilization was so already, you know, topsy-turvy they’ve been doing a lot of this work for decades but March 2020 pushed us into leaving the group we had and going into this new group this new group was we are covert survivors right we’re fighting this deadly pandemic we are now one unit in a Bolshevik style fashion.

 

Woes: Indeed in a global fashion as well, because we’re all implicated. I mean, we’re all connected now. And we’re all affected by this and this is something that I noted that it’s a collectivism. But it’s a very artificial collectivism. And it’s one that really emerged from nowhere. And it was actually in direct opposition to the attitude that everyone was brought up to have I mean, of our generation and the Zoomers maybe the kids will now be enured to that attitude the sort of collectivism. But everyone older than 10 we were all used to individualism which is a drastic change and very well, as you say, only takes 60 days.

 

Marc Malone: Yeah it doesn’t unfortunately doesn’t take that long. But, of course, the longer it goes on the longer it takes to undo, because where the behaviour is now is largely subconscious it’s largely subconscious behaviour now when you’ve reprogrammed behaviour. And this is good, or bad right it goes to the good too like. If you go to the gym for a couple of months you’re no longer having to be motivated to go to the gym you’ve trained your subconscious mind which is 95 of your daily activity to do the work. When you’re driving when I’m driving most of the time I’m not paying attention as a subconscious mind doing the behavioural racking pattern recognition for me right so I very rarely think when I’m changing gears, or anything. Well, this is the same when you’re putting on the mask when you’re doing a six feet distance when you’re staying at home when you’re virtually singling on Facebook. All of these things that they’ve created. And we’re not even getting into vaccine territory yet right we’re really still just in 2020, at this point, you’ve created a subconscious pattern. Now that is playing this out as if this is normal as if this is your reality now but you had to break down the old through trauma to get the brain infantilized childlike to reshape it in the way that they did.

 

Woes: It’s remarkable. Do you think that this. Do you think that this is, I mean, how reversible is it.

 

Marc Malone: Everything is reversible in theory right I mean, theoretically it’s reversible all the way back to pre — 2019 in theory. Is that probable no. So we have to separate the possible from the probable right is it possible yes. But I try not to work with possibility I try to work with probability it isn’t probable right. I mean, it’s possible the entire world population could hold hands together in sync by that’s certainly possible is it probable not really right so I work with the problem and the probable is about 80 20 this is the Pareto distribution this is generally how everything in nature works right 20 create most of the energy most of the resource whatever. So in this case we’re looking at about 20 of population that are like us that are aware of [30:00] what the Great Reset really is have you ever seen a movie they live where he puts on the glasses yeah right. So you could imagine twenty percent of the population are us with the glasses and eight percent, or not so when we see the Greek reset we put it on we go oh that’s the New World Order where’s the 80 don’t so I focus on the 20. And that’s what my organization is my organization is not looking to red pill everybody on this issue. I mean, I’m happy to include anyone in who wants to come in but my job is to separate from it before it comes to fruition. And we can talk about that after if you’d like in solutions territory.

 

Woes: Yeah. Yeah, well. Let’s move on to step three then, or point three the what the plan global governance reset and Agenda 21.

 

Marc Malone: Yes.

 

Woes: That’s a big topic for yeah.

 

Marc Malone: This is the most important part really, because while the globe while understanding their philosophy their psychology while understanding their own literature I do have their books and I recommend reading them if you can but we’re so late in the day now that it doesn’t really matter anymore the important thing is to understand okay. So, what is the string that ties this together. So you have a you have this thing called a New World Order a reshaping of global nations and people and society well what’s The thing that ties the idea that they have to the reality of it happening there has to be something like that actually takes it to a reality it can’t just be an idea it can’t just be an ideology. And the Great Reset doesn’t really help with this, because a Great Reset is in itself still just an ideology. Well enter Agenda 21 which was signed in 1992. So Agenda 21 is the political implementation of global governance it is the political implementation of this New World Order right. So basically this was signed in 1992 by 179 nations which includes the Vatican, but also includes America, Britain, of course, and many people may have seen George HW Bush father bush evil to the core, by the way, people probably would have seen him on the YouTube videos saying when we’re successful with this New World Order. And we will be we have a real chance for the United Nations to regain it’s peacekeeping role and yada yada well that was, because they’d signed Agenda 21.. So you have the idea you need an implementation in comes this almost entirely global political declaration to say we’re going to reshape things with the justification of climate change it is climate change that has been the driving factor politically of most of the problems that people have today economic mass immigration name your issue it doesn’t really matter the point is that climate change has been the justification for most things politically. Not necessarily socially, but politically speaking. And bearing in mind most of these other UN groups and the documents that they sign all fall underneath Agenda 21. So 1992 that was signed as we fast forward through we have agenda 2030 in 2015. 2030 is not a replacement of 21 it is a major milestone year this is really important because. A lot of people think oh Jenna 2030 is what they’re going for now no Agenda 21 is the umbrella Agenda 21 is the agenda for the 21st century the whole century. So gender 2030 is the major milestone yes. So that’s when they want to say all right we want most things achieved by this date right.

 

Woes: And just one example of what I well. Yeah, what do they want to achieve by 2030

 

Marc Malone: Yeah. So let me just finish off on it on 21, because it’s really important when you go through the document which I have the PDF of on my website. If you go to the thesis read the Agenda 21 section if you’re going to read one section of the thesis I recommend that one. I have cited the PDF the world not World Health Organization, the United Nations PDF of Agenda 21. Long story short is it says we’re going to centralize land water and air for the good of saving the planet from climate change you think oh at first glance that doesn’t sound unreasonable fingerland who doesn’t want to look after the land in the water. I mean, I don’t want to poison the water right I care about the land. But, of course, when you realize well lamborton is the entire planet right. I mean, that’s your property that’s your car that’s your movements that’s your economics that’s everything is included under this umbrella. So it really means total control of the world. And you can see this they break it down into every category you could possibly think of from farmland to economics to where you can move yeah everything. So it’s all broken down so then when we come back to 2030 they have tried to say look by the year 2030 so eight years from now we want to achieve 17 of these sustainable development [35:01] goals we want to achieve 17 major milestones I’m not going to go through them all. But there’s some fundamental ones like no poverty like good health. And you think oh good health, of course, when you break into good health and you look at the immunization schedule you start to find that good health really means compulsory vaccination. Now this is 2015 right now we’re just coming into this becoming a reality now but most of this has been documented and wanted for a long time. And they just came up with the excuse they rebranded a cold as the excuse and I knew they were lying from the beginning I did my own data model when they said 2.1 million we’re going to die it’s like okay well that’s pretty serious I just had a baby I have two babies, by the way, I thought okay I’ll do my day tomorrow and I was like oh that’s a bunch of bullshit what the hell. And then, of course, I realized what was going on so everything from mandatory vaccination through to destroying the economics and making everyone equally poor and equally as subservient. But there’s other really important ones too that most people do not know when people talk about globalism I think the mistake that a lot of people conservative types have made about globe globalism is that they think it is like this open border world what they’ve often thought of is its like oh it’s like a like an exal Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez type America with just open borders and everyone just comes and goes. And that’s not true that is just an intermediary step to break down the current structure once the current structure is broken down they plan on locking everybody into regions the global governance plan has nothing to do with, in with an open world, in fact, it’s quite the contrary it is regionalized parts of the world. So, for example, in America this will happen in Britain too and all over the world California is no longer a state it’s split into two regions one called so-called one called norcal. And they are city-state regions and you won’t be able to leave that city-state region does that sound familiar sounds like your life over the last two years just about doesn’t it.

 

Woes: So yeah, and this also sounds like the world of Judge Dredd with the mega cities.

 

Marc Malone: Closer to the hunger games. But yeah, so regionalization. And this is in the document. And you can read it on my thesis I have a 14,000 word thesis about this and we dive deep into much of this topic. But basically it’s a regionalization. So there is never there was never a plan really for some open border world it would there was a plan of fast breakdown Entropy of a current structure. But that was just a that was just an Entropy I was just like setting a house on fire that had nothing to do with the final plan the final plan is have you locked in a city-state region and they plan on breaking national borders with these city-state regions cascadia would be the one in Washington which actually goes into Canada, British Columbia west Canada so a city state’s actually crossed national boundaries so anyway do you have a region.

 

Woes: I just it is sorry to interrupt. But I do remember with the EU back well it must have been 2006 7. I was reading about that they had this region called the arkmanshi region which was the southeast of England and the closest corner of France. And they were saying that this had. This was a historic area a shared history right around here and it’s like these are two separate nation states that have historically been at loggerheads a lot and at war now and then and they have not much in common. And they’ve got a lot to differentiate them sure so, but the EU was trying to treat it as one area. And they had other areas around Europe where they were doing the same thing where they would arbitrarily. I mean, it’s like what the British Empire is accused of doing in Africa where it would just carve arbitrary lines across which would mix that would divide tribes and also mix them with other tribes with no respect given to historical divisions so as to just force them together. Yeah, it’s sick. I mean, it’s a sick thing to do. But yeah, sorry.

 

Marc Malone: No no problem you make a good point. Because a lot of these subtle things really get looked over right. And a lot of these subtle things have been happening for a really long time that we looked over. I mean, I knew about Agenda 21 in this regionalization of the world in 2012. And I thought that’s a bunch of bullshit that’s never going to happen well here we are.

 

Woes: Yeah it starts to everything starts to look a bit more plausible after, you know, after covert, you know, it’s really it’s just.

 

Marc Malone: Yeah. I mean, don’t be wrong I took a lot of the other stuff seriously I just thought that particular part was way too ambitious I was like that’s just gonna be but after seeing them change the human [40:01] condition of centuries in just two months I was like oh []. Well, I would not hold anything back no if this is what they can pull off in just a in a couple of months then give them 10 more years of constant onslaught then absolutely I expect that they could pull this off. But there are things we can do about that and I’ll come to that at the end. So it is no open border world right so okay. So you have a region let’s say the city state of London, or the city state of Birmingham you’re Birmingham that’s where I used to live for a big part of my adulthood Birmingham right. So yeah, Birmingham that is no longer controlled by Westminster that is controlled by let’s just say for arguments like the United Nations right there a global government structure controls Birmingham the same with Paris the same with so-called the same with cascadia which would be Seattle and British Columbia and Canada et cetera. So you have city-state controlled globally that is what we are looking at here. And that is all documented in evidence it’s not my opinion it’s not conjecture right it’s fact that’s true. And if you hear any contrary to that you better ask for the evidence, because I’ve got the UN’s own documents as my evidence I have a map that they created on my thesis on the website so you regionalize and it’s controlled by a global governing structure. And that’s where we have to come to the next important point.

 

It isn’t world government it’s global governance. And this is really important too because. A lot of people have thought we’re going for world government but government would imply that au still have some type of say be that it is an actual government but none of those things are evident at all. I mean, the World Health Organization shut down the world in a weekend Trump couldn’t have done that if he wanted to so who really has the power here well it isn’t really the governments that have the power. And that’s because that’s not supposed to be the case so what’s supposed to be the case is global governance is what we’re looking at here. So we’re looking at governance of the world these regions but not controlled by government controlled by various non-governmental organizations and corporate stakeholders this is all in Agenda 21..

 

Woes: And what about organizations like the World Health Organization, the World Economic Forum the world bank the UN

 

Marc Malone: So yeah, you’re on the Right track that’s exactly what you’re looking at. So you’re looking at a conglomerate of World Economic Forum people not the World Economic Forum itself. So people that attend the World Economic Forums such as, you know, Euromasks Bill Gates as Bezos those would be corporate stakeholders as documented in agenda 2030.. By the way, I can explain how that’s actually being implemented in your city right now. And we’ll get to that. As well, that’s the most important thing to understand here you actually have a lot more power than you think so global governance structure Davos type people UN World Health Organization, etc., yes IMF world bank eventually the world bank would want to swallow up the finances of the central banks like the Bank of England and Federal Reserve okay cool. So that’s what you’re looking at end game regions. So that’s what we’re truly trying to fight here we’re not truly trying to fight some abstract idea of a New World Order, or some abstract idea like one day it’s just going to come in no no it’s coming in now right now it’s happening.

 

Woes: So let’s just nail down this distinction between global like world government which that that implies something with the same kind of structure as the British government, or the US government. But it’s just big size it’s jumbo sized. What you’re seem to be illustrating is more a sort of anatomy of organization organs each of which performs a certain fashion like the world bank would control economics finances the world econom the World Health Organization we talked about health and we’d govern that. And then that would be filtered down the dictates from these different organs would be filtered down to the national level of what used to be called the national.

 

Marc Malone: The regional level regional no national level anymore bypasses national straight to region right so you go UN to Birmingham UN to California, or southern California UN to Minnesota you went to London et cetera.

 

Woes: It’s part of this, because it has been noted recently somebody pointed out that in Britain. And I don’t know how privy you are to this, the news cycle in Britain a few national politicians have been disgraced people closely involved with the Covid staff the Health Secretary Matt Hancock the government adviser Dominic Cummings and the Prime Minister Boris Johnson all three of these men have been disgraced in various ways over the last year. And somebody suggested that as a way [45:01] for these for National Park national governments to be painted as inadequate to deal with the Covid crisis. As a way to justify they are being supplanted in the near future yeah.

 

Marc Malone: So our mutual friend fergan he shared this Telegram post sighting that yes that was that it was him yeah yeah, so I forget who has posted what, because he’s like one of the only guys I follow on Telegram so he’s like. Because I don’t I had to be like dude I’m seeing too much stuff that I already know about. And like I’m just like I don’t need to keep seeing the [] I already know I’m glad people are posting it’s just my brain can only take so much so he shared this point exciting my mentioning of governance not government and pointing out that it’s a purposeful discredit of the politicians and he. And I have discussed this idea before. And that’s exactly what it is, I mean, technocracy is the means of governance with global governance being the end result technocracy does not require elected politicians at all technocracy is the merging together of science medicine politics education military, etc., the merging together of these systems. So what you’re looking at in this system today when a lot of people say this isn’t really communism it’s something new it isn’t really fascism and people always like argue about these terms and like the terms are irrelevant.

 

Woes: Yes!

 

Marc Malone: Right. It doesn’t matter what matters is the thing right it’s like, if I call you a man manu does it me mean that your penis is somewhat somehow gone, because I used a different label the labels are relevant.

 

Woes: Yes right I think people get quite invested in that and they start saying well. But it is like Nazism, because of this thing and it is like communism, because of it really doesn’t matter the reality stays the same regardless of what you call it. And what you associate it with from the past well.

 

Marc Malone: I think that we would we’re not in a we’re just not in we’re not exactly in a good position here guys like we don’t really have the fucking time to be arguing about that kind of shit in case you haven’t noticed in case you haven’t looked around. But since they were at the injection deaths in this country up about 600 percent in case you haven’t heard so there’s.

 

Woes: Yeah, there’s all the footballers having heart attacks and this.

 

Marc Malone: Yeah. The strange deaths yeah, of course, without time to like I said at the beginning it’s like we can have our petty squabbles later. But when the guy with the ax is trying to break down your door you don’t argue about who should pay the Bill on your table right. And that’s where we’re at right now it’s like people arguing about the Bill on the table I’m like the guy with the [] axe is trying to break down the door how about we work together to stop him we’ll talk about the Bill later maybe I should pay it maybe you should pay it maybe we’ll split it right yeah. Yeah, anyway so technocracy is important, because technocracy is the actual system here. So if you really want to know what term to use use technocracy. Because that’s the correct one when you’re looking at the merging of these systems via technology and science and business and politics. But they’re not one system they’re not individual systems anymore they’re one system. But they’re not communism, or fascism, or anything like that it’s something completely different right you’re looking at a centralized technological version of this system. And that’s what technocracy is. So basically what it means is that bureaucrats non-governmental organizations and financiers will control policy so corporate stakeholders as we said World Economic Forum types merged with UN types combined that’s technocracy. That’s what the means of government says and that’s happening in your city right now!

 

Woes: Right okay. So I don’t think there’s anything to paint to expand on that certainly not, at this point, at least. Let’s move on to point four the how which is covered climate change vax passports and digital identity systems so quite a lot there as well.

 

Marc Malone: Yeah I don’t know how long we’ve got like is it an hour one hour?

 

Woes: It was supposed to be an hour. But yeah, we can go for another half hour. That’s 20 minutes.

 

Marc Malone: So I’ll try to get through it covered. So we’ve already talked about covered we should probably talk about how covert and climate work together though and how that’s gonna. And how that ties into the box passport.

 

Woes: I’ll bring in another historical note here, because I just for the sake of scene setting really. I remember people talking about global warming in the 90s that was and it was the ozone layer. And then that didn’t come too much and it didn’t lead to much I didn’t really take hold of the public’s imagination that really. I mean, it was on TV I remember the scary graphics and whatever the ominous voices talking about it. But it sort of died to death. And then in the 2000s late to like 2567 climate change became a thing. And it wasn’t called global warming anymore it was called climate change yeah. Because I think global warming was too specific it wasn’t a flexible enough bogeyman. So [50:02] climate change was the thing. And then that was really taking off I remember politicians. Like what was I can’t remember their names which ones it would have been involved with. But I remember politicians talking about greening the economy that we have to and recycling and I like recycling I’m not against it I’m not against, you know, preventing pollution and whatever I am seen I do value the natural world. But I was always very skeptical about cli. I mean, I was always in just instinctively skeptical about the climate change thing. And I remember a libertarian I was I’ll never remember the website now. But it was a libertarian who wrote an article a rather long essay about climate change as a religion. And it was very interesting, because I had the sinners the apostates the priests the rituals all that. And that was and that’s came back more recently, but then. And so it was really taking off the climate change hysteria then it just died to death. Because the global financial crisis hit in 2008 and nobody had the luxury of thinking about climate change anymore it was. That it was a middle class indulgence and suddenly life was a bit more serious people didn’t have so much spending power the disposable income so they couldn’t afford the luxury of worrying about climate change right then it started to re-emerge again I guess about 2015. And then you’ve got figures like Greta Thundberg more recently. Then Covid hit! But fairly soon after I mean, definitely within the for that year definitely within 2020 climate change was reintroduced again, because It was like they it was almost like they didn’t want people to forget about climate change this time they wanted it to stay in the public’s imagination this time. So, you take it away from there I guess.

 

Marc Malone: Yeah, so as I said, you know, 1992 when Agenda 21 was signed which really is the political New World Order document the only one that’s actually relevant and provable that was all, because of climate change so they knew 30 years ago that that was going to be the battleground the reason Covid came in for a bit is because the climate wasn’t getting us there quick enough that the climate fear wasn’t working so they figured hey why don’t we just rebrand it cold all the old people that die will just give them rem deserve which has about a 53 percent [] rate shuts down the organs like the kidneys that’s great kill loads of them in the care homes oh. And then we’ll scare the [] out of people. And then we’ll bring in climate change later there you go.

 

Woes: And yeah and ban the treatments like Ivermectin and whatever that might be more I don’t know I’m not saying, they are more effective. But certainly the complete disinterest in them is suspicious to me yeah.

 

Marc Malone: So yeah, they had to do this they needed something to get this moving, by the way, they’re the first major milestone year. And it isn’t a major milestone like 2030 that there are sort of these mini milestone years every year the first one was 2020 just in of interest right so 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2050. Seven major milestone years and we hit the first one last year and he noticed anything change. So that’s when I knew how seriously I was like oh [] these people really are serious about this. Okay so the climate was the foundation covert got us through the door we did our reconditioning now they will have to bring climate back. And the reason that they’ll have to bring it back is because the whole thing is built on that ultimately. So also covert has limits it’s done a lot for them. But it does have limits, for example, as we come to the vax passport system which is where we are now which I said was gonna happen in March 2020. This system is only temporary you notice in the EU you notice in Israel they’re called Green Vaccine Passports right green vaccine passports. So eventually the vaccine middle section will just be dropped, because it’s already called a green pass and that green part is the fundamental thing we’re talking about here, because as the as this narrative evolves. And as it becomes climate change you already have a green pass they’ve already conditioned you to use it so the vaccine part will just be dropped I’m sure they’ll keep vaccine as part of it. But it’s supposed to expand obviously much further into this China style Social Credit system right. And what they call on the World Economic Forum’s website a digital identity system so that’s your green pass so then what will happen I predict by about 2025 if not a little earlier a little later they’ll start to incorporate everything climate into this past into this green passage. And then you’ll forget one day. That it was ever even a vaccine pass they’ll start saying things like we need to control your water usage we need to [55:01] control your food usage we need to control your travel usage this is all for the good of the climate course. So you can’t leave your region anymore just happens to be we anticipated there was going to be this region thing. So we have this whole plan lined up just like cloud Schwab is Great Reset, because we’re genius that way we always have this plan lined up so the green pass will take it to levels that the even the covey thing can’t. Because the cove they can’t undercover justify monitoring your water usage, or your food usage they can justify travel, of course, they can justify economic damage but it still has limits especially. Because there are treatments to it. But the earth there’s no treatments too we’re just you’re just gonna have to suck it up [] right.

 

Woes: Yeah. The the how’s the word priority of reducing carbon is that justifies that opens the ground for everything.

 

Marc Malone: We’re mostly carbon right it’s interesting and suddenly we’re just going to start dropping like flies all over the place. So there is definitely that, but so that’s where we’re going with it. And that’s how they’ll merge the two but the easiest thing to remember is that whichever excuse they use whether it’s curvature, or climate the solution they offer is going to be exactly the same so it doesn’t really matter. But we should be more concerned about the climate thing and we should get ahead of it now, rather than reacting to it like we’ve had to react and react and react we need to get ahead of it now before it happens this time and there are many ways that we can do that, right? So that’s very important.

 

So your green pass will be your Social Credit score system. And they’ll say look we have to cut back on everything’s for the earth. And if you look. I mean, if we. Look at how bad people have been when they think you’re they’re saving grandma just imagine how in suffer they’re gonna be insufferable they’ll be when they think they’re saving the world.

 

Woes: Yeah I it would be interesting to talk about the Social Credit score here, because ostensibly there shouldn’t be a direct link between your social life even assuming that there’s a need, or a desire for a Social Credit score that shouldn’t be really linked to climate I mean, how I can imagine a normally being confused by that. So can you explain how is the what will actually be what will count towards your Social Credit score and how will that be linked to climate change?

 

Marc Malone: Okay so imagine that your vax passport five years from now is just a digital identity system on your phone eventually they want it biometric, of course. But let’s just say for now it’s on your smartphone right. And then you tap in a code and it has your whole life on this phone. Now let’s just call it an a.z, to keep it simple. You have an a and it has everything on there how much you earn where you live. But it also has extra curricular activities on there as well and you’re monitored by the phone you’re monitored by the cameras in we have its called geoint geo in the this is what they’re installing in most major cities around the world right now smart sensor smart sensor monitoring right this is military technology which they are installing in camera areas across major cities in the world right now, so you’ll be watching your phone you’re watched from street lamps and from security cameras and every possible point work laptops and that’s it keeps a record of that keeps a record of your engagement how you interact with people did you pick up the dog poop how much beer did you drink how far did you drive how much fuel did you use yada yada you get to this point where they’ve ranked you based on that just imagine it like a actual credit score how much. How have you been a good boy have you been paying off your debts right, or have you been a bad boy have you been using people’s money that they stole and, by the way, that they lent you on money that doesn’t even exist, because interest is poison. But it’s the same thing just expand it out a little bit. And it can easily be done, because everything is done on your phone everything is seen outside they already have everything in place they just need you to buy into it. And then they can action it right now. So that’s a digital identity system it’s a 360 approach. It also include non… I mean, this is on the world economics forums you’ll see the digital identity system sphere and it’ll even include things like opinions on gender equality, you know. But we have to be serious about the other parts, because it’s monitoring usage this is the important stuff here.

 

Woes: I just want to emphasize here. This is why it matters so much to other issues that a lot of my viewers will have will have a great interest in those issues are now absorbed into this issue of the tyranny. And this is why? Because your opinions will be used to give you a Social Credit score which in turn will be used to control you limit your freedom of movement freedom of everything.

 

Marc Malone: So yeah, yeah. Yeah, there are many other issues that, of course, tie into it and we talked to them a bit at the beginning like the breakdown of the family and all [60:01] these sorts of things break down at the Church but where we’re at right now it’s a little bit. Like, if I don’t get my leg amputated I’m gonna die of like gangrene so I need to get my leg amputated that’s where we are now unfortunately so we’re not really at a place where we can go retroactively go. Yeah. But let’s fix all the other issues that we really care about it’s like dude if you do not amputate your leg you’re going to die that’s where we are like it’s really serious really serious we have to take this seriously what last year a billion and a half people were put into poverty 300 million were put into starvation, the death rate since they pull out the injections 600 increase that’s in one year children having children having heart attacks. I mean, it’s never ending 400 rise in suicides. It’s a really serious situation. So it’s like look we’ve got to] amputate the leg right. And then what I look at that’s cutting off technology that’s separating from this system then we can retroactively work on some of those other issues I’m a big family man love my wife I have two babies we’ll probably have another one next year. But they’re not going to have any future in this system we only have a few years right. So, what is the best use of our attention best use of our attention is getting sick rid of this everything else ties to this system everything that else that you have been bothered about over the last few years, or decades has been to lead to this system as I explained. So if you get cut this off you cut it off then we can fix everything else.

 

Woes: Yeah, okay I think that that makes sense it was, because of what you said about your opinions on gender equality. As well, your other your other opinions on everything what everything what kind of TV dramas you like even something like that could be used to gauge off what does that indicate and, etc., post on.

 

Marc Malone: Facebook everything.

 

Woes: Yeah. The algorithms will be astonishingly sophisticated they’ll be able to detect all sorts of things based on this. So that is the vax pass and what well the digital identity with the Social Credit rating.

 

Marc Malone: Yeah,

 

Woes: So I get. Is there anything else you want to say about that.

 

Marc Malone: No. I think that’s I think we kind of understand that this sort of digital identity system is the number one thing you have to resist the number one thing you have to stop, you know, I have heard people say things like we need we can’t resist that we have to be in the system to beat the system. I’m like no no this is the point in a return like this digital identity system there’s no getting back from this is a little bit like the internet itself it’s like saying hey I need to get on the internet to destroy the internet do you really think that’s going to work, of course, like. So this is as big a leap if not bigger than the internet itself. So all I would say is if there’s one thing in your specific personal life that you must resist it has to be the back’s passport that is the most important thing to resist.

 

Woes: Yeah, okay so then that brings us to the final point which is the why. And this is mostly to do with the world view of the ruling class and you wrote here destroying organic man and replacing him with inorganic man which is preferable to their worldview. And do you want to expand on that this is transhumanism really.

 

Marc Malone: Transhumanism yeah I feel like that’s probably a big dive. But yeah, essentially we kind of talked about this in the beginning more than I expected anyway which is the idea that they want to be in control of nature natural law they want to be in control of creating humans they just don’t want us to live a life that is transcendent that that seeks god that seeks good that seeks things that are natural and organic. I actually feel like perhaps the most important thing we should finish up on would be solutions would be local.

 

Woes: Well, indeed that that was the next thing I was going to ask, because he said earlier that people are more, or people have more power than they realize. So what can people do. And what would you advise yeah go for it.

 

Marc Malone: So the bad news. And the good news is the bad news is that this is implemented where you live. So in a sense it’s not going to be national as we talked about at the beginning but the good news is that means that you actually have a lot of control where you live. If this was say UN to Westminster style structure you really I could understand why most people feel powerless. But as I kind of explained it’s city level here they’re creating city region states like the Roman Empire the Roman Empire was a city-state empire. So under the Roman Empire across Europe people the city they were from they viewed as their nation in a sense their region so it’s similar to that, but global first ever truly global empire [65:02] so the good news is that you can actually repeal it from the city that you live in, because it’s implemented at your city council. This is something that most people don’t understand that 2030 legislation sustainable development is implemented by Birmingham city council not by Boris Johnson right, or it’s implemented in Los Angeles not by Joe Biden. That’s really important for you to understand, because you actually have control in your city council elections. I mean, 1,000 people is all. You need to show up demonstrate send letters I the legal system’s slightly different. But in America I opened the organization in June with a speech to the Republican Party in the state of Montana at their convention. So they had chairman directors Congressmen at the presentation that I did talking about this thing and we boiled it down to the local organizations and the local politics which you can see on my website you can go to the website you can go to the presentation under the learn tab you can watch presentations just 25 minutes long covers everything in detail and how this is implemented locally. Long story short is you have UN you have NGOs like united cities and local governments these work all over the world they coerce your city council. And the people slightly above them to adopt this 2030 legislation, the city council then take it on in America if they don’t take it on they won’t get federal funds. So they have to take it on. Otherwise they don’t get the money they will build the roads to pay for the schools so that’s how they get so many of these cities on board with this plan councils, or governments in particular say look do you want the federal funds. And then the county council says yeah and they go okay then sign on the dotted line essentially how it works. But it can be repealed we have what eight years. Now this is speeding up it’s happening very quickly, but we still have time this is the good news about doing this now think of it this way if you were to repeal 2013 legislation in your city that doesn’t save the nation. But what it does do is if that happens in just a few key cities across the nation you do potentially save the nation at that point right so you’re no longer focusing on trying to change things at Westminster you go right. If I can we can get a Birmingham city council repeal. And we can get a Manchester appeal. And we can get a Sheffield repeal suddenly now the nation is starting to look a lot freer and aggregate even though what we’ve done is just mobilizing different points of attention. And this is what we’re trying to do here I have three county governments three county governments backing my plan now a year ago I didn’t even know what I was going to do I started this in January I launched in June. And by the end of this year I have three county governments backing the plan so by next year we may have three states all. Right.

 

Woes: Well I mean, well done congratulations! It’s good. I mean, it’s good for people to see that it’s possible is its so much better to see an example than to hear a lecture.

 

Marc Malone: Yeah no it happened so after I did the first presentation, the governor of Montana dropped the climate membership two weeks three weeks after he then adopted this is super based but he’s banned mandatory vaccinations even on a private level in Montana ban them you can’t even do it at your own business. And now, we have three of their county governments who’ve asked me to go back in February do an event and they’re backing the plan so once we got out 2030 legislation in Montana Montana’s freed up regardless of what happens to the rest of America. Now if we repeat that 5 10, 15 states right red states in the middle of the country, of course, I’m not going to go to San Francisco and do it, you know, but the middle of the country we have a new America regardless of what happens on the coast regardless of what happens to the world right so this we’ve pulled the tentacles out before it happened now granted. If you find me floating at the bottom of the river at some point in the next few months, you know, why. That’s not gonna happen god’s got my back. So here’s what we’re gonna do. But if we do this in Birmingham Manchester in key cities across England. We’ll see the same results.

 

Woes: Right okay all right well that’s very encouraging and interesting and challenging it’s obviously a challenge for everyone who’s just heard that. I think that one of the problems on the Right and I am ostensibly on the Right at least certainly on some issues. But one of the problems with the Right has always been an a well analysis paralysis, but also a sort of defeatism reacting to what’s already been established. And it’s that the ship has sailed in every issue on every issue. And so I think it’s some people are going to have to realize this if you actually do want to enact change and have influence on the way the world goes and the way your country goes and the way your city goes [70:01] then it’s time to its time to get more proactive than a lot of us have been in the past.

 

So yeah, and there are people with natural talents in that direction people who are good at organizing people who are good at leading people are good at problem solving who I think need to discover those talents as soon as possible like no ideally.

 

Marc Malone: Yeah I have a local activism PDF and page on my website. This is probably the best starting point I recommend re watch the 25 minute presentation, because I explain how this works and then read the activism doc I give you just three steps to follow really easy to do like I couldn’t give you I couldn’t be giving you more to start with right. And, by the way, a guy messaged me on Telegram a guy who I think actually came to my channel from yours his name was David and he’s already been implementing this 20, 30 thing. And he said:

 

“He’s got people that are lawyers medicine who agree with this idea of repealing 2013 that’s in the south coast of England so this local activism step by step thing can work anywhere not just America. But this is so try to use the work that we’ve done as a base, because why not it’s obviously working to some degree so you already have a starting foundation now we’ve done a lot of the work already even a lot of this sort of the research and development and even some of the leadership work. But there is a certain amount that you’re going to have to do that like I can’t do right, because I’m trying to work at the sort of state senate level I can’t be in the city on the ground, because who’s then going to be at the state level trying to push these guys to keep doing what they’re doing right.

 

Woes: Yeah, of course, that is I didn’t know that. One of my well mind you that was how I discovered your channels, because somebody shared one of your videos in my Telegram chat so that there I think there is some interplay between these so people should go to your website could you want to see what your website’s called.

 

Marc Malone: Yeah, it’s a America21century.com what you need there. But like I said the presentation local activism should be mostly what you need to get started.

 

Woes: Okay all right. Well, we’ll end it there do you want to say some final words about the importance of this. And I would just say to anyone who’s set who thinks. That this is all very conspiratorial, grand over the top I would just say:

 

“Look what has happened to the world over the last two years look how quickly and easily it was implemented look at the understanding of human nature that. Those who orchestrated this must have and therefore look consider how vulnerable human the public are to their the future machinations of those people. And then consider whether this really is that over the top. So yeah, did you want to put in some final words there?

 

Marc Malone: Yeah even though I knew about a lot of this stuff before 2020, I thought it was over the top two until I started seeing the things that I thought were gonna happen actually happening right. And I would just always say to you look. What do you have to lose by watching a 25-minute presentation right you don’t really have much to lose right I’m sure you’ve wasted more time than watching my 25-minute presentation watch it, because you’ll find out that every single citation I use is from their own resources and literature so it can’t possibly be wrong it can’t possibly be random conspiracy. Do you think that the biggest party in the country the second biggest part in the country would have gone on board with the plan if it was out there and crazy. So I’d ask you to really reconsider that. But I know that we’re at a point where things do seem it’s very easy to, I guess, get to this point where you think well civilization is just ending and I probably should just give up. But I would always say to you is that really even if that were true don’t you want to be the person that you can look at yourself in the Mirror and have self-respect… I mean, this is what we all want, at the end of the day, I don’t know if we’re really going to win. But I have children I have two babies that are under two years old that I want to have a future so I want every day I feel tired every day I get up. And I don’t want to do it. But I do it and at least I can look at myself in the Mirror, at the end of the day, this is ultimately. What we have to do here we have to be able to fight through fear we have to be able to fight through apathy, because it’s very serious we’re no longer on that battleground of social media we’re no longer in the battleground of ideology we’re really at the battleground of actually taking people from their homes in [75:00] countries across the Western world and putting them into quarantine camps and forcefully injecting children. So we just don’t have the luxury of inaction anymore. But there is something we can do I have the plan on my website it’s all free I don’t ask for any money you can donate. If you want to. But I don’t ask for any money for any of the stuff that I’ve done just read it and act on it you will not regret it.

 

And one final thing I want to say too is that before I got into this work I still struggle with stress and anxiety problems, because I really feel like I have the world of the weight of the world on my shoulders many days. But I will say that the more you do these things the easier and the stronger you become as you do them often I think we think that thought precedes action so we go. Okay. If we can think right we can act right. But it’s actually reversed you have to act. And then you’ll think right. And I promise you if you just act for a week, or two your thinking will be much better much clearer and you’ll start seeing things in a more transcendent lens. If you do that and, at the very least, you will be you will have that self-respect and that confidence that’s all I can really say I appreciate your time today mate and thanks family on.

 

Woes: There is just one question from the audience what is the elites end game in regards to the sterilization agenda are they planning on growing cloning us, or growing us an artificial wombs that kind of thing I don’t know if there’s much do you want to say about that there’s still I mean, some people say that the vaccine reduces fertility sure I don’t know if that has been scientifically established yet, or if it ever will be what would you say about this.

 

Marc Malone: Yeah, we don’t have enough data we have some we don’t really have enough on the fertility thing we do know though that the spike proteins definitely cluster around high blood points which would include ovaries we do know from some studies where we’re about 70 percent of the clusters in many cases are around over us so we do know that it definitely affects fertility we just don’t know to what degrees how long.

 

What would I say? Well look the yes there is a Brave New World-esque part of this is what Schwab talks about in his book Fourth Industrial Revolution this idea of sort of genetic engineering he says this himself he said it on the Charlie rose show that the by 2026 only by 2026 gene editing is something that they’re interested, by the way, they’re already doing it right now.

 

Woes: Yeah. The Crispr machine oh well that’s well.

 

Marc Malone: But I would say focus more on the what matters right now and the reality is yes they do care about obviously reducing population especially in the West. Because that’s the most we that’s the most resistant population to global governance right. And then, if you just think of it strategically it’s like right. I’m going to take over. I’m going to take over a town there’s a few different tribes in this town they have the strongest people. So I’m going to take those guys out first. Because then it’s going to be easy to take over it’s really that simple just basic strategy. So in this sense that’s there’s definitely a reduction in fertility and there will definitely be a reduction in population as well unfortunately.

 

Woes: Yeah one other question if anybody here thinks that people won’t continue sleepwalking into techn techno com comey super hell go read about Milgram’s obedience experiment this is I think it was Stanley Milgram and the I’ve forgotten what it was. Called now. But I think most people will be familiar with its where people were told to continue administering a treatment that hurt the patient. And they were they did it, because they were told to by an authority figure a scientist. I’m not sure about the reproducibility of that experiment I’ve heard good and bad about that I’m not sure how reliable it is as a gauge of general human nature. But I don’t know I’m just saying I’ve heard that it can’t be reproduced very well.

 

Marc Malone: Yeah we have to be cautious though. Because there are different types of people within the population. So you have for let’s say, for example, I said was like an 80 20 rule but really the people that are resistant are always resistant. And the people that aren’t always on right. So if you’re talking about say 70, or 80 of the population you’re correct. But there’s about 20 to 30 percent of the population that aren’t like that. And that’s not a small amount of people right and that’s certainly enough to get the job done that was a lot more than they had in the American Revolution yeah a lot more.

 

Woes: Yeah indeed well in many revolutions.

 

Marc Malone: That’s like the only good revolution. That’s why I mentioned every revolution has been far worse than what happened before I think the English people that came here which, of course, were the Americans. But they were obviously English people right I think they’re like the only people I’ve ever done it right actually not. But I don’t know if it’s ever been done right in any other country so.

 

Woes: Well that’s another whole other topic [80:02] all right so we’ll end it there it’s something this has been a really good stream I hope it’s been informative and practically useful for people. So Marc Malone. Thank you very much for appearing on Millennial.

 

Marc Malone: Thanks sir!

 

Woes: Okay and i’ll be back in half an hour with Auron Macintyre. In the meantime, bye bye, for now.

 

[80:32]

 

————

Millennial Woes has created many things. And this is your chance to own one of them! A unique piece of work hand crafted by the vile vlogger, to commemorate Millennial 2021.

 

Millenniyule 2021 commemoration

 

A hundred hours of highly skilled labour went into producing this animated vector graphic, which can be magnified to any size.

In the iconic Millennial Woes font, it glistens and responds to your touch. And at the centre of it all, a figure representative of 2021, the White Stag!

Symbolizing endurance, discovery, and rejuvenation!

This one-of-a-kind creation is up for sale as an NFT. Follow the link below. And it can be yours forever! This is your only chance!

 

[81:30]

 

Millenniyule 2021 – 60 – Mark Collett

 

Well hello everybody. Welcome back to another Morgcast, which I haven’t done for a few weeks because a few things have got in the way.

 

I’ve been working on another script for a longer video. And I wanted to just take the opportunity, … The reason why I set up this podcast was mainly just so I could get into things without doing a load of editing, and it will be a little more off the cuff. Not that well organized. And where I could kind of just let me thoughts flow about things without worrying too much about censorship, like on YouTube, and things like that.

 

And one of the things that’s been on my mind and is on my mind more, and more, is this, the Great Reset, and how it ties in with the Covid and the vaccine passports, and all these kinds of things. And I find it’s just this cloud that kind of keeps coming and it keeps getting worse, and worse! By now I’ve actually done quite a bit of content on this. But I’m surprised that how few other people in my circuit, in this scene, they just don’t seem that interested in it, or at least as not as paranoid about it as I am. But I thought nevertheless I’m gonna carry on, [chuckling] anyway!

 

And one of the things you’ll hear from the people who do talk about this you’ll see links to the World Economic Forum being passed around, articles and clips, and things.

 

And so I thought it would be interesting to actually take a look at one of these articles. Like what is it that they’re saying? What’s actually in the text? And I’d heard of the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” before. I’d heard of “The Internet of Things” before. But I hadn’t heard of the “Internet of Bodies” before.

 

 

Now, just the title “The Internet of Bodies” sounds absolutely horrific to me! And they’ve got this article here which I thought would be interesting to take a look on and kind of go off on tangents and things as we go through it. And it says:

 

“The Internet of Bodies is here. This is how it could change our lives.”

 

And it’s written by a Chinese named Xiao Liu. A Fellow at The Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution World Economic Forum. So the thing is they’re not trying to hide it either. I think it’s fair to come out and like do away with a conspiracy kind of stuff. Even though, … Like that’s the weird thing, when you talk about this it does have the aura of a conspiracy about it. Yeah, it’s just up there on the website, you know.

 

And then you can have a look at what’s going on in the real world, and the vaccine passports and things. I’m sure I’ll get onto that. And you can have a look at what they’re saying on their own website. They’re not trying to hide it!

 

And another thing is, which I’m also going to touch on here, is that you can even argue that this is a good thing. Like these people don’t think they’re evil. They’re not, you know, I mean, Tony Blair is like the worst of the worst! And he’s all involved with this. Then you’ve got that Klaus Schwab, and you’ve got these other people.

 

When they tuck themselves into their beds at night, in their mansions, or their sort of high-rise flats and apartments, like they’ve gotten in Manhattan, or wherever, it is. They don’t actually think they’re evil. They think they are doing the world a service. And when you look into this, when you read what they’re saying, you can kind of understand the reasoning behind it.

 

And so the Internet of Bodies article here. It just says, I mean, this is how it kicks off. And this is again like Xiao Liu a Fellow at The Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution World Economic Forum. So the Fourth Industrial Revolution is basically where everything is going to be hooked up to the internet. And everything is going to be automated. And so that it kicks off and they say:

 

“We’re entering the era of the ‘Internet of Bodies’: Collecting our physical data via a range of devices that can be implanted, swallowed or worn.”

 

So yes, straight away it’s about imposing this on you. So a device that you’re gonna swallow, or they’re gonna implant it – again this is right there on their article – or worn. And the idea of this is that it’s gonna track everything about you. And the way they’re going to frame this is mainly in terms of “health”..

 

So then it says:

 

“The result is a huge amount of health-related data that could improve human wellbeing around the world, and prove crucial in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic.”

 

So Covid’s right at the heart of all of this. And I’m not the first person to point out that it is quite convenient:

 

“But a number of risks and challenges must be addressed to realize the potential of this technology, from privacy issues to practical hurdles.”

 

So they want to bring in the Internet of Bodies. And it’s going to explain what that is. But they are aware that there’s people pushing back. More people locally. I mean, thankfully that there is now a bit of a backlash against this stuff. But so then the article begins in earnest. And it says:

 

“In the special wards of Shanghai’s Public Health Clinical Center, nurses use smart thermometers to check the temperatures of COVID-19 patients. Each person’s temperature is recorded with a sensor, reducing the risk of infection through contact, and the data is sent to an observation dashboard. An abnormal result triggers an alert to medical staff, who can then intervene promptly. The gathered data also allows medics to analyse trends over time.”

 

[06:27]

 

So if you think of the smart thermometer. So you’ve got a thermometer that’s hooked up to the internet. And then it’s also an automated service which is looking at the health of a patient. So instead of having a nurse wandering around taking notes all the time, it’ll all be hooked up.

 

Now this sounds benign! And they’re really gonna hammer this, because they realize this is the carrot! This is like the sweetener. This is the cherry on the cake. The incentive to make it look benign. And yeah they’ve got their arguments for it.:

 

“The smart thermometers are designed by VivaLNK, a Silicon-Valley based startup, and are a powerful example of the many digital products and services that are revolutionizing healthcare. After the Internet of Things, which transformed the way we live, …”

 

I mean, that’s an interesting way to put it, because I’m obviously – if you’re watching this – you’ll know that I’m don’t like technology. And I complain about it’s effects on the world quite a bit. And I’m basically doing it again here. But I mean, the way they’ve put this like:

 

“After the Internet of Things, which transformed the way we live, travel and work by connecting everyday objects to the Internet.”

 

That hasn’t happened where I am! I mean, my telephone is like five years old. I’m not even sure if I could handle all this stuff. I don’t have tags. And what they mean, I mean, an example of the internet of things is where, … Let’s say your fridge. You order your food via the internet. And then like the idea is that you’ll have a “smart fridge”. So the smart fridge will then be keeping track of the things in the fridge. And then they’ll have like a tag on. So the fridge will be able to warn you if say that the butter is going out of date, or something like that. Then the fridge can say:

 

“Well you’ve got this, and this.”

 

Or the fridge will prioritize it and say:

 

“Well, this is the oldest stuff. So this is what you need to be using.”

 

What the internet of things, the Internet of Bodies is going to do, is then take up one step further and then see how this is going to affect your health. So they’ve just said before you’ll be hooked up. They’re gonna mention smart watches in a bit. But you’re gonna be hooked up to the internet.

 

 

So you all of your things in the house will be, the fridge let’s say, in this example, that’s going to be hooked up to the internet. The fridge will then be detecting the things that are in it. And how long they’ve been there. It’s possible that the fridge will also just automatically sort of contact the supermarket for you and then put in your own weekly shop, for example.

 

But then at a different level what’s also going to be logged is your body itself and what your body’s actually taking in! So, and if you’ve got an implant or a smart watch, whatever it happens to be, then you go from ordering your shopping. I mean, it used to be the case where you just go to the supermarket and buy it. I mean, I still do. And then it’s like that will be done on the internet. The fridge will be hooked up on the internet. The food inside will be hooked up on the internet. And then your body is going to be hooked up to the internet.

 

And all of these things are going to – which they’re going to come to a minute – it’s going to be this like huge sprawl of data which can be analyzed. But we are not there yet. I think they’re getting a bit carried away in terms of the internet of things. So anyway, they go on and say:

 

“Some of these solutions, such as fitness trackers, are an extension of the Internet of Things. But because the Internet of Bodies centres on the human body and health, it also raises its own specific set of opportunities and challenges, from privacy issues to legal and ethical questions.”

 

So again, like written right into the heart of this, is human health. So if you go out jogging, for example, if you go out for a morning jog what they call fitness trackers will be logging that. That will be more data and information about your body! And then you’ll come back and you’ll maybe have a shower. Having the shower will also be an internet process. And it will be sort of set in there on what temperature you like to have the shower.

 

[11:16]

 

And when you put the two things together with your implant, or your smart watch, if you’re jogging back home it may be that the shower will begin to turn itself on, or something like that. That’s where they’re gonna go. I mean, it seems to me that it’s a hell of a lot of things, as they would have it, that need to be replaced.

 

Like I mean, I’ve got nothing that can deal with any of this! My stuff’s all ancient! And I’m fine with it. But I suppose something like a fridge is closer there, than a shower. It seems to me it’ll be quite a bit of work to automate the shower. But the idea is everything will be automated and done via the internet. And I think it’s a good thing. So before everybody gets like paranoid like, they don’t see this as being “bad”. And it says:

 

“It also raises its own specific set of opportunities and challenges, from privacy issues to legal and ethical questions.”

 

Then they’ve got this sort of graph here:

 

“Most consumers are open to the use of digital in healthcare.”

 

And then they’ve got this big list of, … Just a few of them, I mean, “search for doctor ratings and reviews”, which is all digital. “Pay my health insurance bills” is digital. “Monitor my daily health metrics” is already digital. Mine isn’t! “Search hospital, or health system ratings and reviews. Order prescriptions. Search for a doctor.”

 

 

All of these things. There’s a lot of them there. So they’re saying that all of these things are already digital. I mean that seems to be a bit of a stretch. Because, at the end of the day that’s just googling like what doctors are in your area. So is that really the same thing as having a database of your information on which could be tracked? I don’t think so.

 

The next section says:

 

“Connecting our bodies. As futuristic as the Internet of Bodies may seem, …”

 

I mean, I just can’t believe that term:

 

“Many people are already connected to it through wearable devices. The smartwatch segment alone has grown into a $13 billion market by 2018, and is projected to increase another 32% to $18 billion by 2021. Smart toothbrushes and even hairbrushes can also let people track patterns in their personal care and behaviour.”

 

So I mean, I don’t have any hair brushes, because I don’t have any hair! But the smart tooth brushes, you can see again like the information which will be going through the toothbrush will be how many times a day that you’re brushing your teeth, and how much toothpaste that you’re using. So this is the internet of things.

 

A toothbrush will be a thing. And then like, how are you doing it, right? Or do you need to replace the toothbrush? Or even like what is the current state of your dental care? So this will be reported, then it connects with the Internet of Bodies, and then it’ll go into the data bank on you.:

 

“For health professionals, the Internet of Bodies opens the gate to a new era of effective monitoring and treatment.”

 

So yeah, [chuckling] so the internet will be monitoring your health for you and then suggesting treatment. So you may have a cracked tooth, or something like that. Eventually it’ll pick it up and report it into the database [chuckling], maybe:

 

“In 2017, the U.S. Federal Drug Administration approved the first use of digital pills in the United States. Digital pills contain tiny, ingestible sensors, as well as medicine. Once swallowed, the sensor is activated in the patient’s stomach and transmits data to their smartphone or other devices.”

 

So this is already in play in 2017. So you then swallow a sensor, and it activates in the stomach. The data which it’s picking up about your body then goes onto your phone, your smartphone, or other devices. Maybe a laptop, or something. And so, I mean, I still wouldn’t be interested in that. But at least in this case it seems that it’s kind of like just you and your computer. But they want to hook that up to the internet as a whole.:

 

“In 2018, Kaiser Permanente, a healthcare provider in California, started a virtual rehab program for patients recovering from heart attacks. The patients shared their data with their care providers through a smartwatch, allowing for better monitoring and a closer, more continuous relationship between patient and doctor. Thanks to this innovation, the completion rate of the rehab program rose from less than 50% to 87%, accompanied by a fall in the readmission rate and programme cost.”

 

.

 

[16:26]

 

So, if you’ve got health problems this will seem like a good thing! So this is the positive side of it. This is the way they’re trying to sell. This, you know, it’s all very well, if you’re fit and healthy and you say:

 

“Well I don’t need any of this garbage!”

 

But, you know, especially for old people, people with illnesses, this will be good for them. And I think if people are going to be critical about this, or scared of it, you have to think, you have to sort of confront it on its own terms. You can’t of just pretend it’s a bunch of evil demons. Like if you’ve got a sick relative and they’re housebound, this is good stuff for them. So let’s not pretend that that isn’t the case:

 

“The deluge of data collected through such technologies is advancing our understanding of how human behaviour, lifestyle and environmental conditions affect our health. It has also expanded the notion of healthcare beyond the hospital or surgery and into everyday life. This could prove crucial in fighting the Coronavirus pandemic. Keeping track of symptoms could help us stop the spread of infection, and quickly detect new cases. Researchers are investigating whether data gathered from smartwatches and similar devices can be used as viral infection alerts by tracking the user’s heart rate and breathing. At the same time, this complex and evolving technology raises new regulatory challenges.”

 

So this is really what they’re getting at, is that the internet of things is, as they would say, is a “done deal”! They need to have your body hooked up to it. And then that will then alert the various authorities to the state of your health.

 

Now the thing is like they’re basically changing everything about how we live, to keep people safe, as if people are like really weak. Because I mentioned just before about well if you are in a bad way, this stuff may be useful to us. But they want to bring it in for everybody, all across the board, whether you’re fit, or not! This is just going to be, this is just the Great Reset! So everybody will be hooked up to the internet and being monitored all of the time! And they’re selling it as:

 

“Well, it’s going to be good for your health!”

 

So in my view it makes people into babies. But if you look at the way they’ve came out with Covid, they’ve used the same logic as well. And it’s like:

 

“Well, we have to shut things down, because we have to keep people sort of safe. We have to prevent people from catching this! We have to stop people from dying!”

 

And you see that you are kind of like a child. And you do have this kind of big system, this Big Brother system taking care of you like you’re a little baby. And they want to have this is a permanent feature of everybody’s lives, where everybody is being monitored, everybody’s got an implant, a smart watch to begin with. And you’re taking care of your pulse. It’s seeing how active you’re being. It’s looking at the state of your heart rate.

 

You’ll take your little implant and swallow it and it’ll sit in your stomach. So then it’s maybe going to know if you’ve got some kind of cancer. And what you’re going to pay for that is, … Well this is what they’re going to come on to, because there’s problems with the implementation. And it says:

 

“What counts as health information? In most countries, strict regulations exist around personal health information such as medical records and blood or tissue samples. However, these conventional regulations often fail to cover the new kind of health data generated through the Internet of Bodies, and the entities gathering and processing this data.”

 

[20:50]

 

So the problem they’ve got is that basically it’s not allowed [chuckling]! It’s not allowed to do this [laughing]! Because the health legislation. Again like, it’s just this obsession with the health, bodily health! I just find it just speaks to such a weak population that they’re so obsessive about not falling ill. But they get you in a bind because then they’re gonna say:

 

“Well, you don’t care about people?”

 

Or:

 

“Would you do this if you were dying?”

 

But the problem that they’ve got is a lot of the legislation was written decades and decades ago, before this technology existed. And that is now sort of standing in the way of them bringing this in. So he says:

 

“In the United States, the 1996 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA), which is the major law for health data regulation, applies only to medical providers, health insurers, and their business associations.”

 

So the standard sort of practice in the Western world was that somebody’s data on health would be kind of kept very private. I mean, in the case of the health insurers that’s already a little bit of a leak, I suppose. But I don’t know how you get around that. But this little legislation is standing in the way basically. That’s what he’s getting at here.

 

And they need to find a way around it, or they need to find somehow to undermine it, so then your health information, … Which is to say, by the way, like this is just the thin end of the wedge. It’s going to be everything about how you live. But I’ll come on with that:

 

“This definition is turning out to be inadequate for the era of the Internet of Bodies.”

 

So what he’s saying is that the legislation is out of date. You know, it doesn’t occur to him for a second to say that the Internet of Bodies is like a bad idea, or unethical, or intrusive, or overreaching, or anything like that. No! It’s the previous legislation that’s a problem is what he’s saying:

 

“Tech companies are now also offering health-related products and services, and gathering data.”

 

Which, you know, they do. So this is like being tracked. And then targeted advertising and that kind of thing. Let’s just say, like I had an accident last year, I ended up getting burned. And then you look for creams on the internet, or your maybe I’m talking about it in an email with somebody. Then that gets picked up. And then you’ll find that the next thing you’re on the internet you’re being bombarded with like creams, different creams for burns, or some fancy bandages, and this kind of thing. So what he’s saying is that this kind of thing already exists. Your data is already being picked up. So like what difference does it make?:

 

“Tech companies are now also offering health-related products and services, and gathering data. Margaret Riley, a professor of health law at the University of Virginia, pointed out to me in an interview that this Act (HIPPA) does not cover the masses of data from consumer wearables, for example.”

 

So yeah, what they’re saying is that you can’t really complain about the internet of things, well the Internet of Bodies, primarily because the internet of things has already got your private data. Your private data has already been pissed all over the place, because of the internet of things [chuckling] which is coming in! So that it’s like there’s no point in complaining about it now! We’ve already traveled so far down this road, why not just go all the way? And put an implant in your stomach which tracks what you’re eating?:

 

“Another problem is that the current regulations only look at whether the data is sensitive in itself, not whether it can be used to generate sensitive information. For example, the result of a blood test in a hospital will generally be classified as sensitive data, because it reveals private information about your personal health. But today, all sorts of seemingly non-sensitive data can also be used to draw inferences about your health, through data analytics.”

 

So yeah, again like it goes back to if you’re ordering your shopping off the internet, then they kind of know what you’ve ordered, they know what your consumer habits are. The data is already being picked up probably through by your bank details. So they know what you’re buying.

 

[25:52]

 

But what’s going to happen, because they’ve already implied this at the beginning of the article. So let’s just take the example that you’re out for a jog, and you slightly overdo it. And your smartphone, you know, it’s too hot, you’ve gone too far, you’re getting overheated, or whatever. And then your smartwatch, maybe will start to buzz. And like say like:

 

“You’re going to have to sit down for five minutes and have a drink of water, because you’re reaching your Max here.”

 

The problem is like once we’ve hooked up everything else, once we’ve hooked up our food, and our fridge, and our the bank details. Like am I gonna get a warning if like I’m sitting on a Friday night, am I gonna get a warning? Is my implant gonna buzz when I reach for like the third bottle of Crafty Old Hen? Will it will it be that I’ve reached the Max? How does that work? What about if I have two bacon sandwiches, in two days in a row? Will the fridge buzz to say that I’m eating too much bacon?

 

 

Like, is it going to be like 2001 Space Odyssey? Where you’ve got HAL advising you, like [chuckling] a little robot? Advising you not to take the third bottle of Crafty Old Hen?:

 

“You’ve already reached your limit Dave!”

 

Is this what this is about? So they’re saying:

 

“But today, all sorts of seemingly non-sensitive data can also be used to draw inferences about your health, through data analytics. (((Glenn Cohen))), …”

 

[Laughing] I mean, a lot of people haven’t been interested in all this stuff, because they didn’t have, … My take on why so few people in the nationalist scene don’t seem to be very interested in all of this stuff was, because there wasn’t a clear, there doesn’t seem to be loads of (((Cohens))) at the top of it.:

 

“A professor at Harvard Law school, told me, …”

 

Mr Cohen there, …:

 

“Told me in an interview that even data that is not about health at all, such as grocery shopping lists, can be used for such inferences.”

 

So they’re going to say if your shopping list is full of donuts, and all this, then the data will be run through the system and checked off. And it will be yeah:

 

“You eat unhealthily!”

 

Now, are they then gonna sort of make a judgment on that? Well yeah, that’s the big thing, isn’t it? Is it gonna be benign, or is it that you’re going to be constantly bombarded with messages telling you like – just to keep with the example of donuts – will you get a message, or a little warning that you’re eating too many donuts?:

 

“As a result, conventional regulations may fail to cover data that is sensitive and private, simply because it did not look sensitive before it was processed.”

 

So again this is the thing where they’re saying:

 

“Well we’ve already come this far already.”

 

Then it’s:

 

“Data risks – Identifying and protecting sensitive data matters, because it can directly affect how we are treated by institutions and other people. With big data analytics, countless day-to-day actions and decisions can ultimately feed into our health profile, which may be created and maintained not just by traditional healthcare providers, but also by tech companies or other entities.”

 

[29:42]

 

I mean, what we’re going to have like Google take care of your health now? Or some internet app.

 

Is now going to be in charge of your health? And all of the data? I mean, yeah:

 

“May be created and maintained not just by traditional healthcare providers, but also by tech companies or other entities.”

 

I mean that’s kind of already here I suppose:

 

“Without appropriate laws and regulations, it could also be sold. At the same time, data from the Internet of Bodies can be used to make predictions and inferences that could affect a person’s or group’s access to resources such as healthcare, insurance and employment.”

 

So this is what I just mentioned. There’s the potential there that you will be judged on how you live. Like not how you perform in the job, but about you as a person. About what you eat. I mean, look we can come on to that. I know what people are thinking.

 

Let’s just for now stick with the issue on health. Because what they’re saying is the potential will be there to discriminate against you. So if you’re a boss, like you’ve got two employees. One of them is a heavy drinker. He doesn’t take care of himself. He doesn’t exercise very much. And the other fella’s like really super fit! All of the stuff he’s eaten, … And then the employer can look that up. There’ll be a way for the employer to think:

 

“Well, I like the guy who sits and has a high protein milkshake on a Friday night, more than the one who’s reaching for the third bottle of Crafty Old Hen.”

 

This is what they say. It’s a fear, but it seems to me all this amounts to is taking one more step. So they keep going these different steps:

 

“Well, we’ve got the internet of things, it seems sensible to have the Internet of Bodies! Oh we’ve got the Internet of Bodies, so now we can maximize efficiency around who’s healthy and who isn’t.”

 

So then goes on. It says:

 

“The affected people may not even be aware of this.”

 

So you wouldn’t even know why you’d been turned down. But, because you’re not going to be judged. You know, in the old days you’d go along for a job interview. And it was kind of like who had the best patter. Who had the best bullshit! Who could sort of kind of manipulate the boss, or whatever.

 

Now like with this, what they’d be saying like, this is what this is moving towards is that you as a person don’t actually exist. What exists is a set of algorithms and a spread of data, which will be just glanced down. You will just be data on a file. You’re just a mass of algorithms and numbers. And they’re going to be able to run down it and see which ones they like, which ones they don’t.

 

So this raises the question of, like is this ethical? And they’re going to move on and say:

 

“One solution would be to update the regulations. Sandra Wachter and Brent Mittelstadt, two scholars at the Oxford Internet Institute, suggest that data protection law should focus more on how and why data is processed, and not just on its raw state.”

 

So then it would the boss, and to keep on with this example, would have to ask why he had that data, or why he needed it. But the problem with that, … I mean, that’s weak!:

 

“They argue for a so-called ‘right to reasonable inferences’, meaning the right to have your data used only for reasonable, socially acceptable inferences.”

 

Now I’m calling bullshit on this right from the start! Because what is, or is not, socially acceptable in the West today changes like the wind! It changes like the weather! I mean, if you look at like a few years ago, nobody was talking about trannies. And yet now it’s just everywhere! It’s the media who decides what is, or not, socially acceptable. Because, if you raise an objection, you’ll just be platformed and ignored, or worse!

 

So I find this whole thing here socially repulsive! I find this not acceptable at all! I don’t find any of this creeping technology and the idea that you’re gonna reduce the person down to like an algorithm. I don’t find that acceptable at all!

 

But I haven’t got any choice in the matter, because what is, or is not acceptable is decided from the top! And then it drips down through the media. And then it sort of gets the normies on side. I mean, I’m pretty convinced. I mean, I’d love to see just how insane they could, … Like you see things coming out now about like beef with human DNA in it, or whatever.

 

Like just as a sort of mental exercise would it be possible, … Because, I mean, my sort of contempt for the normies has reached like maximum by this point, after witnessing the last few years. And it gets to the point where you realize they’ll just do what they’re told! They’ll just do what the media tells them.

 

You can even speak to normal people in the real world. And you can even know if they read The Daily Mail, or if they watch the BBC. So somebody, I mean, usually it will be a man who reads The Daily Mail. And I can tell by what he’s saying and his general attitude and things, that this is a Daily Mail reader. This is where he gets his information from.

 

I can also tell when it’s somebody’s more likely to be the BBC. So it’s not like an exact science, but I kind of get it. And so their opinions on the world are just being molded by the media. The media is itself then the sort of the propaganda wing of the those in power at the top.

 

[36:07]

 

So when they say:

 

“Well socially acceptable.”

 

Like that’s not acceptable! Because what is, or is not, socially acceptable, it’s just a matter of whatever the media wants! Would it be possible for the media to normalize cannibalism?

 

 

Because you see something coming in. I mean, I had this with “White Privilege Theory” years ago. And you think:

 

“Well, this can’t come in. This is obviously bullshit! This can’t grow legs! And here we are! Every institution, every education center, big documentaries on the television. Can you do that on cannibalism? Can the media normalize cannibalism?”

 

I mean, another one which is similar again is eating the maggots, eating bugs! Which is related to this. Are they going to normalize that? They’re already doing it. They’re already slowly smoothing the way, and sort of rewiring the brain of the masses, so that all of a sudden:

 

“Well, why not?”

 

And I know how they do it as well. They’ve got this sort of post-modernist kind of way of approaching it, which undermines the a priori assumption which went before it. Like:

 

“Well, why not?”

 

See there’s social standards that we’re used to. Like say eating maggot sausages, or something. Now the reason why we don’t do that, is like, is it rational? So then, when you go back:

 

“Well, we just we don’t do it, because we just don’t do it!”

 

It’s like that’s just the way things are. But you see that’s where the post modernism kicks in and says:

 

“So you can’t really explain it.”

 

So it’s like it doesn’t really make sense, and you begin to see this undercutting of these narratives. That’s why it’s so toxic.

 

So I mean, just in terms of like social acceptance, like forget it! They’ll just normalize it through the media:

 

“This would involve setting standards on whether and when inferring certain information from a person’s data, including the state of their present or future health, is socially acceptable or overly invasive.”

 

Like once again, that will be decided by manipulation, anyway.

 

The next section, which I think is the last one, is called “Practical Problems”:

 

“Apart from the concerns over privacy and sensitivity, there are also a number of practical problems in dealing with the sheer volume of data generated by the Internet of Bodies. The lack of standards around security and data processing makes it difficult to combine data from diverse sources, and use it to advance research. Different countries and institutions are trying to jointly overcome this problem. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and it’s Standards Association have been working with the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA), National Institutes of Health, as well as universities and businesses among other stakeholders since 2016, to address the security and interoperability issue of connected health.”

 

So this comes down to trying to centralize all this. Because if America is operating under certain conditions, certain legislation, certain rules, certain internet providers, and all of this. And then say Europe, and China, and Russia, … And this is a problem, they need to kind of sync all of this up.:

 

“As the Internet of Bodies spreads into every aspect of our existence, [chuckling] we are facing a range of new challenges. But we also have an unprecedented chance to improve our health and well-being, and save countless lives.”

 

Again, I mean, let’s not get carried away about the vaccine at the moment. But, is it worth it then? It it worth it to be sort of in the matrix, like hooked up to the internet, everything you do, everything you eat, how often you go to the toilet? And you’re being monitored by your own devices, your body, your physical health, you’re just being monitored all of the time!

 

Now, will that result in a healthier society? Well, probably it will, to be honest. But is there something missing? Is this what humans are all about? So then it moves on again. And it says:

 

“During the COVID-19 crisis, using this opportunity and finding solutions to the challenges is a more urgent task than ever. This relies on government agencies and legislative bodies working with the private sector and civil society to create a robust governance framework, and to include inferences in the realm of data protection.”

 

[41:20]

 

So what they’re doing is bringing in the entire system. So the government is then going to work with say the financial sector. And the financial sector will work with the media, and then law. And all of these things are going to be interconnected and pushing in the same way. What the Neo-reactions call “The Cathedral”. Like this is it! This is how it works! Each node of this network will reinforce the other nodes to make the narrative inevitable.

 

So what people tend to do is push back against one kind of node in particular. If you take the example of Donald Trump getting elected it’s like one sort of part of that network took a fall there. In this case it was like the government, the political. It took a bit of a beating there, because they didn’t want him in. And then what steps in is that all of the other nodes sort of step in to pick up the load, and undermine him on all sides.

 

And this is what they’re gonna do as far as this is concerned. And you see them all in lockstep. It’s bad! Like it’s really bad! Because it’s like this huge network that you’re up against. And it’s difficult. You can have a temporary win over one part of it. But you can’t take it all on, all of the time. Which is why like, once you really wrap your head around this it does kind of lead you to think:

 

“What do we do? What do we do about this?”

 

Because, if you were to win an election and declare a dictatorship, you’d have to have one hell of a powerful state. And you’d also have to be dragging people off to jail. Because then you’re going to be in the situation where one of the nodes has to overwhelm all of the other ones, and this kind of thing.

 

 

So what he’s saying here is that all of these different institutions have to get on board and push in the same direction. Which also, they do say, like keep in mind the data protection and this kind of thing. I’m not convinced! Because I don’t trust any of these people! But more than that is that I just don’t like the thinking! I don’t like the logic and the reasoning behind any of this! So:

 

“The key is to collaborate across borders and sectors to fully realize the enormous benefits of this rapidly advancing technology.”

 

So it’s going to be global, as well. So you’re going to have a global internet of things and bodies, which will all be interconnected. And that’s been, you know, I know people are going to say:

 

“Well it’s been like that for 20 years.”

 

It was like that in some ways. But what they’re doing now is like where the implant in your skin, and what you’re eating in your fridge, and everything, it’s all going to be hooked up to this data set.

 

Now the problem that they’ve got, is how to bring this in. Because sooner, or later, it seems to me, that there has to be a direct implementation of an ID which would make all of this much easier. Otherwise it would be too scattered.

 

And yeah, so this could be the vaccine passport. Because even though the Covid itself is like drifting away now, they talk about the vaccine passports is only now really getting off the ground. So if you’ve got a vaccine passport then there’s the “Digital You”. And again they’ve used health. You’ll see in this article that it’s all about “health”. Because it puts you in a bind where it’s like:

 

“Well do you want to have all of these people die off? We could save so many people! And people who are in danger of having a heart attack, if they’re hooked up to the Internet of Bodies they’ll be alerted to that, because their body will transmit the data.”

 

[45:36]

 

Your body is just a data set which is being monitored. And then it will be reported back to your smartphone, or your device, as they call it, and it will all be alerted.

 

This is a Social Credit system. That’s what this is. Because all it’s lacking is a judgmental sort of consciousness. But I don’t even think they need to do that, because everything you do is gonna build up an online picture of you.

 

And that’s certainly gonna be like what you actually watch on the internet. What you read. Even I mean, eventually if you read a book, or something like that. Because, if you order an edgy book off Amazon – well you won’t get one on Amazon! If you use your bank to order some edgy book off Imperial Press, then that’s going to be logged, because you’ve used your bank card, you’ve used your bank details, and that too will be part of your data set. That will then be logged. They’ll see that you’ve done that.

 

So then they’re going to say:

 

“Well okay this, …”

 

Then the data will be run through the system. And let’s just say you ordered said some reprint of a Julius Evola book, or something. You know, Revolt Against the Modern World, which seems quite fitting [chuckling] in this particular case, then that book itself will be run against more algorithms. And it’ll start and set off alarm bells and it’ll be like.:

 

“This is something that the far-Right read. This is far-Right literature! Julius Evola was a fascist!”

 

And then these little bells will start to ring. And then that will be against you as well. And that seems minor. But I mean, I’m doing this video here and just yesterday you see that people are being blocked from airplanes. You’re travel banned.

 

In China, which is just like one, or two, steps further along the line on this, that would be automated. It would be automatic where you:

 

“Well you’ve just dropped below the line! You can’t, I’m sorry. But there’s a bit of a problem there.”

 

At least in the case of say Nick Fuentes, it’s directly related. He’s well known, he’s outspoken. You’ve got what happened on January 6 and everything. So there’s actually something going on about it. What happens when it’s just automated, because of what you do? What happens if it’s, because you’ve ordered Julius Evola’s book from Imperial Press? Imperial Press will itself be down there. That will itself ring off alarm bells.

 

So all of a sudden the picture that’s going to be built up of you, will in that case would be a negative one. So that’s kind of like, why I’ve become so pessimistic about all of this stuff. And I’m not sure of a way out of it.

 

I mean, if you’re aware of the Michel Foucault thing, and the Panopticon of the prison. I think it was Jeremy Bentham before him as well. Where you have a prison, because people will use that word Panopticon quite a lot with the internet. They’ve done it for a long time.

 

And the thing is, it has subtle effects on the human mind. Because people are going to be aware that everything, they are doing is going to amount to data which is being logged. And it’s going to become algorithms. And this will actually affect human behavior.

 

In my opinion this will have a profound effect on how humans just actually exist. I mean, they use that language themselves. It’ll affect everything about your existence! Because you can say in the case of your fridge and whatnot, you’re going to be aware that what you’re putting in there is tracked. That it isn’t just the personal. It isn’t just a private thing anymore. And and so this will then have an effect and you’re gonna begin to comply in certain ways. Your mind will, in your habits of how you live, will be trained and it will push you into a certain mode.

 

Now what, let’s say the elites, the people behind this, what they’ll reply to that:

 

“There isn’t a brain behind it. That it is benign, and it is just sort of dead data.”

 

[50:41]

 

But the problem is we know that they have an ethical code. We know that they support say “Social Justice”. We know that there’s like a political slant to this. And we know that they think some people behave in ways which is better than others.

 

Now it will not just be political, of course, it will be also to do with your health.

 

But what this means is that it’s going to create a society where even if they don’t bring in like an outright social score – which I think they will – but as they said when it came to the employers, you may never know about it. I mean, if the employer is going to cross you off his list, because he’s seen your data, or a sort of condensed representation of your data, then like they admitted themselves in this article you’d never know about it anyway. So it may well be that this is also going to be in your normal day-to-day life.

 

And there’s going to be a certain model that they’re going to push that people are going to adapt to, because they know they’re being watched. So maybe you won’t reach for the third beer, you won’t buy that Julius Evola book, you won’t rock the boat, you will conform! Even if it isn’t explicit, even if the punishment isn’t sort of directly dangling over you, you will conform to a certain mode, and that’s exactly how a Panopticon works. And that’s what this is.

 

So whether, or not, they will just go full bore, I mean, you’ve already got people having their bank accounts closed down, and you begin to see that in the old days something like a bank would be like non-political. You may well have like a special rules about somebody supporting terrorism, or some crazy thing. Your country’s at war and that the government will lay down the law to the bank that you can’t have people using this bank to fund arms runs for people who the state is fighting against. And all of this kind of thing.

 

But when we look at how this whole network is constructed everything becomes politicized in a certain way. They’ve all got incentives to help each other out. So all of a sudden something like a bank on the High Street which didn’t care about your politics, all of a sudden that becomes politicized. It becomes involved! It becomes one of those nodes on the network.

 

And where does this come from? I mean, in the case of the World Economic Forum it is like the elites.

 

So this is the reason why I want to do is, because it needs to be pushed back against. But and what they’re going to do is say:

 

“Well, you just want, …”

 

It automatically puts you into this reactionary mode. It automatically puts you where you’re kind of waving your hands and just trying to tell the modern world to stop! Which is a bad, bad, situation to be in!

 

So if you go back to my conversation with the Woodlander, it is kind of like:

 

“Well how can we kind of have a different vision from this?”

 

So when the backlash comes, and it is! In all fairness it is. You’ve got hundreds of thousands of people on the streets of London just last weekend. But like the media just won’t report it properly. Again, because it’s just another node in the network.

 

So, when the people are pushing back against this they need to have a positive narrative. We understand all of this, and we’re not saying throw all this technology out. But let’s at least, why can’t we just get it to work for us in certain ways? There’s a conversation to be had there.

 

But yeah, that’s what I think of the Internet of Bodies. And even the word. Even the word of it, is like where the human body just becomes an object. It just becomes this sort of “meat sack” of data which is like numbers on a computer screen.

 

And the thought processes, you know. I find that they’re just the complete lack of poetry, and spiritualism, and metaphysics, in the world. Like we’ve seen that dwindle away over decades, and decades, and even centuries. And it reaches now to this point where the human form, the human being is just an object! It’s just a mass of numbers and data. Which will be controlled by more numbers and more data in the technology, in the technique.

 

Because in the end that’s what this comes down to its Western man who created all of these wonders. And all of these technological marvels, falling into his own machine.

 

Like as we look into the future you begin to understand what Martin Heidegger said, which I’ve mentioned before, where he said:

 

“Only a god can save us now.”

 

And you begin to get it. You finally begin to get what the bargain was. The downside of the bargain!

 

So let the pushback begin.

 

Thanks for listening folks. I know it’s been a bit of a gloomy one, but I feel like I’ve got to have a few words on this.

 

So I’ll see you next time. Take care now.

 

 

[56:39]

 

 

[Outro music and imagery by Theberton.]

 

[57:05]

 

 

END

 

[Readers: If you see any errors (however minor), or ways to improve things, in the transcript, please let me know in the Comment section. Also please share the link to this transcript, so others can benefit. Thanks.]

 

============================================

 

 

xx UNFINISHED TRANSCRIPTS — Volunteers Needed

 

 

============================================

 

See Also

 

 

Millennium Woes with Morgoth on Brexit — TRANSCRIPT

Millennial Woes’ Millenniyule 2017 No. 66 – Morgoth — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – YouTube Hangout 01 – Skeptics and Cucks — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – YouTube Hangout 02 – Merry Holocaustmas — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review — Discussing the Government’s Anti-Extremism Agency ”Prevent” With Based British — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review — Hate-Reading The Guardian – Hirsch, Critical Theory & Nihilism, Jan 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review — The Psychotic Left, Feb 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – Fishing For White Pills, Feb 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – Hope Not Hate and the State of Play, Feb 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

Morgoth’s Review – A Conversation with Jacktion, Mar 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – YouTube Hangout 01 – Skeptics and Cucks — TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice TV – Extinction Rebellion, Our Future of Bugs and Pods – Morgoth’s Review – Oct 10, 2019 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – Against The Controlled Warmongers of The Right – Jan 3, 2020 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – Turbocharged Atomization – May 15, 2020 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – Free Falling – Jun 1, 2020 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – ”Cracka” Is Anti-White Filth – Jun 29, 2020 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – Edward Bernays – The Group and The Herd – Jul 1, 2020 — Transcript

 

 

Morgoth’s Review – Why The Conservative Party Conserves Nothing – Jul 16, 2020 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – The Telegraph vs The Guardian – Or How To Lose A Culture War – Jul 31, 2020 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – On Liberal Blindness To The Jewish Question – Aug 4, 2020 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – Notes On Machiavelli – Aug 14, 2020 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – Neo-Liberalism & the Ballad of Terry Bell – Sep 15, 2020 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – Morgoth & Endeavour’s Classic Movies 1 – Lawrence of Arabia – Oct 10, 2020 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – Systems of Control – China’s Social Credit vs Western Political Correctness – Oct 16, 2020 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – The Deep Breath Before the Plunge – Nov 3, 2020 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – The Twitterfication of Everything – Nov 17, 2020 — Transcript

 

Morgoth’s Review – My Image of 2020 – An Analysis – Dec 7, 2020 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – London’s New Year’s Firewoke Display – Jan 1, 2021 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – Winter is Here – Jan 9, 2021 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – Reading ”American Extremist” by Josh Neal – Feb 6, 2021 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – The Frozen North & Frozen Thinking – Feb 10, 2021 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – The Equation That Destroyed Our World – Feb 14, 2021 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – The Last of Us – Feb 24, 2021 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review – How Piers Morgan Shapes the Discourse – Mar 3, 2021 — Transcript

 

============================================

 

PDF Notes

* Total words = 8,993

* Total images = 15

* Total A4 pages = xx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

 

 

Version History

 

Version 4:

 

Version 3:

 

Version 2:

 

Version 1: May 1, 2021 — Published post.