Updates — Plain List

Posts that have been updated are listed here, with the latest at the top.


Version 2: May 17, 2020 — Re-uploaded images and  PDFs for katana17.com/wp/ version. Improved formatting.




Red Ice TV — Why They Want To Replace White People, Nov, 2018 — TRANSCRIPT
Version 4May 3, 2020 — Re-uploaded images for katana17.com/wp/ version. Added See Also links.





Book: White World Awake! — Stopping the Planned Extermination of Our Volk
Version 3: Mar 5, 2020 — Re-uploaded images and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version.






Continue reading

Posted in Admin, Updates to Posts | 15 Comments

All Posts — Plain List

Continue reading

Posted in Admin | 6 Comments

“White Lives Matter” Banner Day — Sun, Aug 9, 2020

“White Lives Matter”

Banner Day

Sun, Aug 9, 2020







Suggested Method of Displaying Banners


“Virtual” White Lives Matter Banner Images

Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 01 — House of Commons

Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 02 — Stonehenge

Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 03 — Tower Bridge London

Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 04 — ?

Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 05 — ?

Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 06 — ?

Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 07 — ?

Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 08 — ?

Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 09 — ?

Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 10 — ?

Banner Making


See Also

PDF Download

Version History







Sunday, Aug 9th, has been designated “International Day of Indigenous Peoples” by the United Nations since 1994 to celebrate the progress and achievements worldwide for Indigenous peoples and their rights.

The indigenous people of Europe, Whites, are being subjected to a generations long program of psychological warfare by “Globalists“, led by Organized jewry that will lead to the “gradual” genocide of Whites through a combination of below replacement rate birthrates, miscegenation, and the mass invasion of non-Whites into the homelands of Whites in Europe and the White settled lands of North America, Australasia, etc.

The recent “Black Lives Matter” protests, riots, and mass propaganda, by Main Stream Media acting on behalf of the “Globalists” are based on lies that aim to further guilt trip Whites into self-hatred.

As a counter to this, Whites need to stand up and proclaim that “White Lives Matter” to raise awareness of our looming demographic demise, in order to prevent it, and assert our right to live in White only societies, free of the chaos created by the poison of multiculturalism to all concerned.

Recently Patriotic Alternative, a British based movement, recently held a “hike and banner reveal” at Mam Tor, Derbershire, UK. PA urges Whites activists worldwide to engage in a mass “banner reveal” around this coming Sunday, Aug 9, Indigenous Day.

To this end, here are a series of inspirational images and suggestions to spur on activists for that coming day and beyond.

Please do your part, small or big, in this activity.





Suggested Method of Displaying Banners



Patriotic Alternative suggests that banners be displayed in a “hit and run” style where the banner is displayed briefly, and photos and videos are taken that are then uploaded to social media for publicity. A “photo shoot“.

This will lessen the chance of any confrontations developing with the brainwashed anti-White zombies and authorities working on behalf of the (((Globalists))).






Displaying banners, putting up stickers, posters, etc., should all be done in a legal and safe manner. Don’t let your enthusiasm get the better of you, that causes you to place yourself in harm’s way, or get into legal trouble. This is a long struggle that requires patience and sustainability.



“Virtual” White Lives Matter Banner Images


(All images can be enlarges by clicking on them)

Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 01 — House of Commons



Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 02 — Stonehenge



Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 03 — Tower Bridge London




Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 04 — ?



Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 05 — ?



Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 06 — ?



Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 07 — ?



Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 08 — ?



Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 09 — ?



Virtual White Lives Matter Banner 10 — ?




Banner Making


Banners can be made professionally, of course, but also can be made at home with only basic materials. Please put suggestions in the Comments section.




Please leave suggestions, criticisms, etc., in the Comments section below.





See Also



White Lives Matter Banner Man Jake Hepple Stands Tall!






PDF Download



PDF Notes
* Total words =
* Total images = 4
* Total A4 pages = xx
Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):
(Available later)



Version History


Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Jul 12, 2020 — Published post.

Posted in Laura Towler, Mark Collett, Multiculturalism, Patriotic Alternative, Propaganda, Western Civilization, White genocide, White Lives Matter, White Nationalism | Leave a comment

Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 22 (last) – Winners and Losers

[Part 22]


[Benton Bradberry’s 2012 book, “The Myth of German Villainy” is a superb, must-read, revisionist look at how the German people have been systematically, relentlessly and most importantly, unjustly vilified as the arch criminal of the 20th century. Bradberry sets out, coolly and calmly as befits a former US-Navy officer and pilot, to show why and how the German people have been falsely accused of massive crimes and that their chief accuser and tormentor, organized jewry, is in fact the real party guilty of monstrous crimes against Germans and the rest of the world.


In Part 22, (Chapter 23) the author concludes the book by stating that the winner of World War II was its instigator, International Jewry, while the loser was Western Civilization.








NOTE: The author has very generously given me permission to reproduce the material here — KATANA.


The book can be bought at Amazon here: The Myth of German Villainy




The Myth of


German Villainy




Benton L. Bradberry






[Clicking on a link in the Contents here will take you to that Part, in a separate post]


[Part 01]


Chapter 1 – The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation

Germany’s Positive Image Changes Overnight

[Part 02]

Chapter 2 – Aftermath of the War in Germany

The Versailles Treaty

Effect of the Treaty on the German Economy

Was the War Guilt Clause Fair?

Did Germany Really Start the War?

[Part 03]

Chapter 3 – The Jewish Factor in the War

Jews at the Paris Peace Conference

Jews in Britain

[Part 04]

Chapter 4 – The Russian Revolution of 1917

Bolsheviks Take Control

Jews and the Russian Revolution

Origin of East European Jews

Reason for the Russian Pogroms Against the Jews

Jews Leave Russia for America

Financing the 1917 Revolution

Jews in the Government of Bolshevik Russia

[Part 05]

Chapter 5 – The Red Terror

Creation of the Gulag

Bolsheviks Kill the Czar

Jews as a Hostile Elite

The Ukrainian Famine (Holodomor)

[Part 06]

Chapter 6 – The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads Throughout Europe

Jews in the Hungarian Revolution

Miklos Horthy Saves Hungary

Jews in the German Revolution

The Spartacist Uprising in Berlin

Jewish Bolsheviks Attempt to Take Italy

Jewish Bolsheviks Attempt to Take Spain — The Spanish Civil War

Czechoslovakia in Danger of Communist Takeover

The Comintern’s Aim? World Domination!

[Part 07]

Chapter 7 – The Nation of Israel

History of the Expulsion of Jews

[Part 08]

Chapter 8 – Jews in Weimar Germany

Jews Undermine German Culture

[Part 09]

Chapter 9 – Hitler & National Socialists Rise to Power

The 25 Points of the National Socialist Party

[Part 10]

Chapter 10 – National Socialism vs. Communism

National Socialism

Jews Plan Marxist Utopia

[Part 11]

Chapter 11 – Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany

Text of Untermeyer’s Speech in New York

The Jewish Persecution Myth

Effect of Boycott on the German Economy

Jewish Exaggerations are Contradicted by Many

[Part 12]

Chapter 12 – The Nazis and the Zionists Actually Work Together for Jewish Emigration out of Germany

The Nuremberg Laws – 1935

The Zionist Movement

[Part 13]

Chapter 13 – Life in Germany Under Hitler

Night of the Long Knives

1934 Annual Nazi Rally at Nuremberg

Hitler Revives the German Economy

Hitler Becomes the Most Popular Leader in the World

[Part 14]

Chapter 14 – Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory

Chapter 15 – The 1936 Olympics

[Part 15]

Chapter 16 – Anschluss”. The Unification of Austria and Germany

Austrian Economy Revived

Austria’s Jews

[Part 16]

Chapter 17 – Germany Annexes the Sudetenland

[Part 17]

Chapter 18 – War with Poland

The Polish Problem

Hitler’s Proposal to Poland


German-Polish Talks Continue

Jews Influence both Roosevelt and Churchill

British and American Political Leaders Under Jewish Influence

Roosevelt’s Contribution to Hostilities

Lord Halifax Beats the War Drums

Germany Occupies Bohemia and Moravia

Roosevelt Pushes for War

Anti-war Movement Becomes Active

Poles Murder German Nationals Within the Corridor

[Part 18]

Chapter 19 – The Phony War

Russo-Finnish War

The Norway/Denmark Campaign

German Invasion of Denmark and Norway

Churchill Takes Chamberlain’s Place as Prime Minister

[Part 19]

Chapter 20 – Germany invades France Through the Low Countries

The Phony War Ends.

Churchill the War Lover

The Fall of France

Hitler Makes Peace Offer to Britain

[Part 20]

Chapter 21 – The Allied Goal? Destruction of Germany!

[Part 21]

Chapter 22 – Germany as Victim

Rape and Slaughter

Jewish Vengeance

The Jewish Brigade

[Part 22]

Chapter 23 – Winners and Losers





Chapter 23




and Losers



It has been observed that World War II was a continuation of World War I.


While that observation is clearly true, it is not the whole story. World War I was fought to prevent Germany from dominating the continent of Europe, and the Versailles Treaty was then imposed to hold Germany down. When Germany managed to throw off the Versailles fetters and became a great power again, her old antagonists, France and Britain, were determined to have another war. But that was only one element of the Second World War. In the mean time, another predatory force ― International Jewry under the banner of Communism ― had emerged from the wreckage of the First World War to threaten a now prostrate and defenseless Europe. The Jews had always been there as a rival force to Western, Christian Civilization, but they had always been kept in check. Now, they were spreading over Corpus Europa like surging bacilli in an ailing body with a weakened immune system.


All of Europe, including Russia, was bankrupt and disorganized as a result of the First World War, and therefore extremely vulnerable to the predations of this new aggressor. Russia was the first to fall into its grip, the result of the 1917 Revolution, which then became its base of operations. Using the economic and military power of Russia which it now controlled, International Jewry, under the banner of Communism, set about to seize control of all of Europe. Their modus operandi was to foment revolution amongst the disgruntled masses through a network of Jewish dominated Communist parties (which were organized under the Moscow based “Communist International”, or Comintern), and then to coordinate with the Jewish populations in each European country who functioned as “fifth columns.” (A “fifth column” is a group who clandestinely undermines the nation from within.)


Germany alone seems to have recognized this new threat to Europe for what it was, and organized itself to oppose it. Germany’s old antagonists, Britain and France, eventually initiated a war against Germany (WWII) in pursuit of their same old agenda of holding Germany down, though this aspect of the war became subsidiary to the main struggle. The main struggle was between Germany, as the self-designated defender of Western Christian Civilization, on the one hand, and International Jewry masquerading as Communism, intent upon the conquest of all of Europe, on the other. Germany’s Hermann Goering understood the true nature of the war.


“This war is not a Second World War. This is a great racial war. In the final analysis it is about whether the German and Aryan prevails here, or whether the Jew rules the world, and that is what we are fighting for out there.” (Hermann Goering, as quoted in Michael Burleigh’s book, “The Third Reich, A New History,” 2000)


It is not clear the extent to which President Roosevelt and the Roosevelt administration understood the true nature of the war, and to which of the two aspects of the war it was most devoted. Many in the Roosevelt administration no doubt had been convinced that Germany was a threat to world peace and had to be stopped (nonsense, of course). But what did Roosevelt believe? Roosevelt himself was inclined to socialism and was himself an admirer of Joseph Stalin (“Uncle Joe,” as he called him) and of Communist Russia, and he surrounded himself with like-minded men.


The Roosevelt administration was infiltrated through and through with Communist Jews who were the devoted agents of Jewish controlled Communist Russia. These men did all in their power to harness American might to the cause of Soviet Russia (and thereby, to the cause of International Jewry). Roosevelt’s Jewish Undersecretary of the Treasury Harry Dexter White was a secret Soviet agent, and the majority of Roosevelt’s advisory staff were Jews with undisguised Soviet sympathies.


Roosevelt’s agenda appears to have been to join with the Soviet Union to destroy Germany and then divide control of the Western world between the United States and the Soviet Union. Every decision he made throughout the war indicated that that was his consistent aim.


Through the Lend-Lease program, Roosevelt threw the entire industrial might of the United States behind “Uncle Joe” and the Soviet Union. 20,000 airplanes, 440,000 trucks, and massive quantities of all other kinds of war materiel were funneled into the Soviet Union from the United States. Without this massive support, Russia could not have defeated the Germans.


At the same time that the Soviet Union engaged Germany in a titanic struggle on the ground, both Churchill and Roosevelt, each with a different agenda, worked together to destroy Germany’s cities through aerial bombardment. Britain and the United States only entered the ground war at the end when Germany was already essentially beaten.




With millions of her people killed and most of her cities destroyed, Germany was the palpable loser of World War II, but the real, long term winners of the war were less obvious, at least, at first. Britain is listed as one of the victors, but for Britain, it was a pyrrhic victory. By forcing Germany into the war, and then doggedly refusing to consider Germany’s numerous peace overtures, Churchill accomplished nothing except to bankrupt his country and bring the curtain down on the British Empire.


The two obvious winners of the war were the United States and the Soviet Union. That was clear to everyone. But the other big winner, which was perhaps not so obvious, at least not at first, was International Jewry. One could even say that International Jewry was the primary winner of the war, though, to make such an assertion violates a very strong taboo today. Jews may only be portrayed as the war’s ultimate victims, not as victors. But, in actual fact, the Jews won on all fronts.


After the Soviets entered Eastern Europe at the end of the war, Jews were installed as the ruling elite in nearly every country which fell under the Soviet Union’s control. John Gunther, in his book, “Behind the Iron Curtain,” Harper, 1949, wrote that:


“Poland, Hungary, Romania, and Czechoslovakia all have Jewish Dictators.”


The three Jews at the top of the Hungarian government, according to Gunther, were Matyas Rakosi (Rosencranz), Erno Gero (Singer), and Zoltan Vas. In Poland they were the Jews, Minc, Skryeszeqski, Modzelewski, and Berman. In Romania, the Jewish ruler was Anna Pauker. In Czechoslovakia it was Rudolph Slansky. The only non-Jewish dictator behind the Iron Curtain was Tito of Yugoslavia, though his right hand man was the Jew Mosa Pijade.


According to Gunther:


“He is Tito’s mentor… Whatever ideological structure Tito may have, he got it from the shrewd old man.”


Not only were the dictators of these countries Jewish, their administrations were almost entirely Jewish. The key positions were filled by Jews in almost all of the Soviet occupied country. The Jews controlled the Soviet Union, and Jewish elites now controlled nearly all of the countries under Soviet occupation. These ruling Jewish elites were loyal not to the countries they ruled, but to International Jewry, based in the Soviet Union.


The Jews also obtained their long sought after state of Israel as a result of the war, and in the time honored tradition of winners of wars, the International Nation of Israel demanded and received billions of dollars in reparations from the loser, Germany (Germany has paid Israel $75 billion in reparations to date. The reparations demands of the ruinous Treaty of Versailles only required Germany to pay $35 billion.) Today, six and a half decades after the war, Germany is still paying lifetime pensions to half a million so-called “Holocaust survivors” ― that is, to Jews who either lived in German occupied territory during the war, or who were forced to emigrate as a result of the war.


When the war in Europe came to an end, it seemed that the Jews were in control of everything. They controlled the Soviet Union, and virtually controlled Britain and the United States. They were so numerous within the Allied occupying administration in Germany that they dictated all the terms of occupation, including the Morganthau Plan. They were in total control of the Nuremberg Trials. They were even placed in charge of most of the newspapers in occupied Germany.




Germany was not only the loser of the war, but also the victim of aggressive war waged against her by Britain, the United States, the Soviet Union, and International Jewry, for reasons which were very different from those publicly declared. Not only did the Jews control the Soviet Union, as has been repeatedly stated herein, but both Roosevelt and Churchill were surrounded by Jews, and their foreign policy decisions were heavily influenced by Jews. International Jewry had as much to do with instigating the war as any other faction, perhaps more, and the Jews were the greatest long term beneficiaries after the war was won. A series of quotes from that time supports this view.


“When the National Socialists and their friends cry or whisper that this [the war] is brought about by Jews, they are perfectly right.” – The Jewish magazine Sentinel of Chicago (8 October 1940).


We managed to drag the United States into the First World War and if they (the US) do what we demand in regards to Palestine and the Jewish armed forces, then we can get the Jews in the USA to drag the United States into this one (the Second World War) too.” – Weizmann to Churchill (September 1941).


“Hitler doesn’t want war but he will be forced to it, and in fact soon. England has the final say like in 1914.” – Zionist Emil Ludwig Cohn.


“On the 3rd of June, 1938, the ‘American Hebrew’ boasted that they had Jews in the foremost positions of influence in Britain, Russia and France, and that these ‘three sons of Israel will be sending the Nazi dictator to hell.’”Joseph Trimble, The American Hebrew.


“The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish hegemony throughout the world.” – Brigadier General George Van Horn Moseley, The New York Tribune (March 29, 1939).


“The millions of Jews who live in America, England and France, North and South Africa, and, not to forget those in Palestine, are determined to bring the war of annihilation against Germany to its final end.” – Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederland (September 13, 1939).


“In losing Germany, Jewry lost a territory from which it exerted power. Therefore it was determined to re-conquer it.” – Louis Marschalko, “The World Conquerors: The Real War Criminals.


“The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism.” – Rabbi Felix Mendlesohn, Chicago Sentinel (October 8, 1942).


“We are not denying and are not afraid to confess that this war is our war and that it is waged for the liberation of Jewry… Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry. We are not only giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based, we are not only providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going. The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. And we are the Trojan horses in the enemy’s fortress. Thousands of Jews living in Europe constitute the principal factor in the destruction of our enemy. There, our front is a fact and the most valuable aid for victory.” – Chaim Weizmann, President of the World Jewish Congress, Head of the Jewish Agency and later President of Israel, in a speech on December 3, 1942, in New York.


“We made a monster, a devil out of Hitler. Therefore we couldn’t disavow it after the war. After all, we mobilized the masses against the devil himself. So we were forced to play our part in this diabolic scenario after the war. In no way we could have pointed out to our people that the war only was an economic preventive measure.” – US Secretary of State James Baker (1992).


“There can be no doubt: National Socialism was part of a modernization process in German society. It expedited the social changes in Germany. It transferred more to the underprivileged segments of society and brought equality and emancipation to women.” – Heinz Hoehne, Gebt mir vier Jahre Zeit [Give Me Four Years], Ullstein Publishing House, Berlin-Frankfurt 1996, p. 10).


“I see no reason why this war must go on. I am grieved to think of the sacrifices which it will claim. I would like to avert them.” – Adolf Hitler (July, 1940).


“It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. Nor had I ever wished that after the appalling First World War, there would ever be a second against either England or America.” – Adolf Hitler (April 1945).




Though the Jews emerged as the unequivocal winners of the war, at the same time they managed to establish themselves in the public mind as the war’s ultimate victims, entitled to billions of dollars in reparations, while being totally exempt from any criticism for their own violations of civilized standards of behavior and conduct. They were able to do this because they control the news and information media.


For the Jews to continue to characterize themselves today as a threatened minority surrounded by hostile majorities determined to “persecute” them, or even to “exterminate” them (as they claim Iran, and for that matter, the entire Arab world, wants to do), is totally absurd. The Jews are now the most powerful nationality in the world, despite their small numbers. Having won the war, they have abandoned the now defunct Soviet Union (after looting it of its assets), and moved their base of operations to Israel and the United States. Within the past three or four decades, the Jews have risen to elite status in the United States, totally displacing the traditional WASP (White Anglo/Saxon Protestant) elite who used to run the country. Their infiltration of the highest offices of every American institution, their extreme over-representation in every profession, their control of government, their control of banking and finance, their control of the news and entertainment media, their over-representation in the universities, is even more pervasive in America today than in Weimar Germany. For instance, of the eight Ivy League Universities in America, six have Jewish presidents.


But unlike the WASP elite whom they have displaced, the Jews have become what Professor Kevin McDonald, in his trilogy of books on Jewish culture, calls a “hostile elite.” The old WASP elite never lost its sense of noblesse oblige towards the ordinary people of America. They were, after all, of the same religion and of the same ethnic origin, and they felt a sense of responsibility for the general welfare of all of their fellow citizens. Our new Jewish elite is different. They feel no identity with ordinary Americans, only disdain, and they concern themselves only with “what is good for Jews.


Not only does this new Jewish elite have no empathy for the traditional European majority in America, they actively work to undermine it. According to E. Michael Jones, in his book, “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History,” 2008, Jews have been behind each and every one of the anti-white, anti-Christian movements in this country, especially since the early 1960s. The NAACP was founded by Jews. The Civil Rights Movement was organized and promoted by Jews. So was the Sexual Revolution, the Hippy Movement, the Feminist Movement, the promotion of homosexual rights, same-sex marriage, the Separation-of-Church-and-State Movement (an attack on Christianity), and especially the Multicultural Movement. It was the Jews who managed to change our immigration law in 1965 which then opened our doors to swarms of non-white, non-Christian immigrants.


This new immigration policy bodes to doom the traditional America we knew. It has been projected that the white majority of the United States will be reduced to minority status within two or three decades. This demographic shift will completely change the character of this country, and not for the better.


Moreover, the Jews have done precisely the same to Europe, so that the demographics of Europe are being drastically changed also. It is deemed that undermining controlling majorities and promoting multi-culturalism is “good for Jews.” Divide and conquer, as it were. While all the different ethnic and religious groups now resident in the United States are squabbling among ourselves, our new Jewish elite uses its power to promote the interests of Israel and International Jewry.


The 5.2 million Jews in the United States, and the 5.8 million Jews in Israel conspire together to manipulate and control the great power and wealth of the United States and direct it to the benefit of International Jewry and the nation of Israel. American money and technology has been used to build one of the most powerful military forces in the world in tiny Israel. Working through their fellow Jews who control the American government, Israel virtually dictates our foreign policy, especially in the Middle East, and the American Army is being used as a proxy army for the tiny state of Israel, in order to achieve their foreign policy aims. In addition, vast sums of money are continuously siphoned off from the American taxpayers, without their consent, and funneled into Israel. A portion of that money is then sent back to the United States to fund the campaigns of politicians who obediently do their bidding, thereby insuring that the money cycle continues unabated.


By these means, and others, the Jewish AIPAC (The American Israel Public Affairs Committee) totally controls the American government, both the Congress and the Executive branch, and the Jewish dominated news and entertainment industry controls American public opinion.


Though Jews claim only to be perpetual victims, under constant threat of persecution and even extermination by their Gentile host populations, they were, in fact, the indisputable winners of World War Two, and they have reaped all the rewards of that victory. They now rule everywhere.




The Jewish dominated Soviet Union could not have defeated Germany unassisted, but then one must realize that the war was not just a war between Germany and the Soviet Union; it was a war between Germany and International Jewry. The Soviet Union was only a component of that war. Powerful Jews in the United States and Britain pulled both of those countries into the war on the Soviet Union’s side.


Germany, of course, could not withstand this overwhelming combination of forces arrayed against her and so, Germany was destroyed.


Conventional wisdom still seems unable to comprehend that Germany’s destruction was a disaster for the West. Germany has always been an integral component of Western, Christian Civilization; the very heart of the old Holy Roman Empire, which formed the foundation of modern Europe. By allying ourselves with the Soviet Union and International Jewish Communism against Western, Christian Germany, the United States and Britain brought about the virtual suicide of the West. Adolf Hitler, the champion of Western, Christian Civilization and the man most responsible for preventing a complete takeover of Europe by Jewish led Communism during the inter-war period, was driven to suicide, and Europe’s great promise under the leadership of Hitler and Germany died with them.


The consequences of the war were immense. Two thousand years of accumulated art, architecture, culture, and science went up in smoke as the heart and soul of Europe was gutted by the war. The European economy was bankrupted. Survivors of the war were starving to death in their millions. The British Empire crumbled. Half of what was left of Europe fell under the control of the Jewish, Communist Soviet Union. A long Cold War between East and West then ensued. As a result of the war, Western Civilization’s path was changed from one of limitless possibilities to one of inexorable decline.


At the beginning of the twentieth century, the white race dominated the world. The First World War dealt Western Civilization a deadly blow, though Europe might have recovered from that. But today, some six and a half decades after the devastating Second World War, a war which could easily have been avoided, the white European race faces the danger of eventual extinction. Its birth rate now hovers below the population maintenance level, while hoards of non-white, non-Christian immigrants swarm in from all sides ― both in Europe and the United States ― polluting, diluting, factionalizing, and Balkanizing our once homogeneous populations, to the point that the process now seems irreversible. If “Demographics is destiny,” then the destiny of the West is in inexorable decline, while the fortunes of International Jewry are in the ascendency. The so-called “good” war has resulted in a very “bad” end for the West. Even Churchill eventually recognized the great error of Britain and the United States in siding with the Soviet Union against Germany. In a speech long after the war, he said:


“We slaughtered the wrong pig.”



The End





In addition to the numerous books and articles cited within the text, the following list of books, almost all from the author’s personal library, were used in writing “The Myth of German Villainy.

Baker, Nicholson, “Human Smoke,” 2008

Barnes, Harry Elmer, “The Genesis of the World War,” 1929

Barnes, Harry Elmer, “Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace,” 1969

Beard, Charles A., “President Roosevelt and the Coming of the War,” 1941

Beckman, Morris, “The Jewish Brigade,” 2009

Bellock, Hilaire, “The Jews,” 1922

Best, Nicholas, “The Greatest Day in History: How, on the Eleventh Hour of the Eleventh Day, of the Eleventh Month, the First World War Finally Came to an End,” 2008.

Black, Edwin, “The Transfer Agreement,” 1984, about the agreement between Adolf Hitler and the Zionist Jews to help create a Jewish state in Palestine by “transferring” German Jews there.

Blum, Howard, “The Brigade: An Epic Story of Vengeance, Salvation and WWII,” 2002, about the Jewish Brigade that entered Germany after surrender.

Britton, Frank L., “Behind Communism,” 1952, a history of the Jews in Europe and their founding role in Communism.

Bryant, Sir Arthur, “Unfinished Victory,” 1940, a book supporting Nazi Germany.

Bukey, Evan Burr, “Hitler’s Austria: Popular Sentiment in the Nazi Era, 1938-1945,” 2000

Burleigh, Michael, “The Third Reich, A New History,” 2000

Dawson, William Harbutt, “Germany Under the Treaty,” 1933

Dilling, Elizabeth, “The Roosevelt Red Record and its Background,” 1936

Dreyfus, Paul, in “La Vio de Tanger,” May 15, 1939, about Nazi Germany’s barter system.

Duffy, Christopher, “Red Storm on the Reich: The Soviet March on Germany, 1945,” 1991

Eby, Cecil D., “Comrades and Commissars: The Lincoln Battalion in The Spanish Civil War,” 2007

Evans, Richard J., “Lying About Hitler,” 2001

Finkelstein, Norman, “The Holocaust Industry,” 2000

Finkelstein, Norman, “Beyond Chutzpah,” 2005

Fish, Hamilton, “FDR: The Other Side of the Coin,” 1977

Fish, Hamilton, “Tragic Deception,” 1983

Fleming, Thomas, “Illusion of Victory,” Basic Books, 2003

Flynn, John T., “The Roosevelt Myth,” 1948

Friedrich, Jorge, “Der Brand, (The Fire),” 2004, about the bombing of Germany.

Gay, Peter, “Weimar Culture: The Outsider as Insider,” 1968

Gilbert, Martin, “Churchill and the Jews,” 2007

Gilbert, Martin, “The First World War,” 1994

Gooch, John, “Mussolini and His Generals: The Armed Forces and Fascist Foreign Policy, 1922 — 1940,” 2007

Halter, Marek, “The Wind of the Khazars,” 1988

Hoggan, David L., “The Forced War,” 1961

Hansen, Randall, “Fire and Fury, The Allied Bombing of Germany, 1942-1945,” 2008

Howe, Irving, “World of Our Fathers,” the story of East European Jewish immigration to America, 1976

Irving, David, “Hitler’s War,” 1977

Irving, David, “Churchill’s War,” 1987

Irving, David, “Goering,” 1989

Irving, David, “Apocalypse 1945: The Destruction of Dresden,” 1963

Jentsch, Mary Hunt, “Trek: An American Woman, Two Small Children, and Survival in World War II Germany,” 2008, about the “Trek” out of East Prussia after the Russian invasion near the end of the war.

Johnson, Eric A., “Nazi Terror: The Gestapo, Jews, and Ordinary Germans.” 2000

Jones, E. Michael, “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, and Its Impact on World History,” 2008

Kershaw, Ian, “Making Friends with Hitler: Lord Londonderry, the Nazis and the Road to War,” 2004, about Londonderry’ admiration for Germany and friendship with Hitler.

Kershaw, Ian, “The End: The Defiance and Destruction of Hitler’s Germany, 1944-1945,” 2011

Kilzer, Louis C., “Churchill’s Deception: The Dark Secret that Destroyed Nazi Germany,” 1994

Knappe, Siegfried & Ted Brusaw, “Soldat: Reflections of a German Soldier, 1936-1949,” 1992

Knight, G.E.O., “In Defense of Germany,” 1934

Koestler, Arthur, “The Thirteenth Tribe,” 1976, about the Khazar origin of Ashkenazi Jews.

Kramer, Mark (Editor), “The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression,” 1992

Lindbergh, Charles, “Autobiography of Values,” 1978

Lindemann, Albert, “Esau’s Tears, Modern Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews,” 1997

Linge, Heinze, “With Hitler To The End, The Memoirs of Hitler’s Valet,” 2009

Lowe, Keith, “Inferno: The Fiery Destruction of Hamburg,” 2007

Mandell, Richard D., “The Nazi Olympics,” 1971

Marschalko, Louis, “The World Conquerors: The Real War Criminals,” 1948

Martin, Ralph G., “Jennie, The Life Of Lady Randolph Churchill: The Romantic Years,” 1969

McDonald, Kevin, “A People That Shall Dwell Alone,” 1994

McDonald, Kevin, “Separation and it Discontents,” 1998

McDonald, Kevin, “The Culture of Critique,” 1998, — a trilogy on Judaism and Jewish Culture.

McDonough, Giles, “After the Reich,” 2007

Meyer, Henry Cord, “Five Images of Germany: Half a Century of American Views on German History,” 1960.

Mueller, Margarete G., “Lost Years,” 2008, a tale of German civilians escaping East Prussia ahead of the Russian army.

Neumann, Franz, “Behemoth: The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, 1933 — 1944,” 1944.

Nitsch, Grunter, “Weeds Like Us,” 2006, yet another story about a German civilian family escaping East Prussia ahead of the Russians.

Orwell, George, “Homage to Catalonia,” 1938

Persico, Joseph E., “Roosevelt’s Secret War: FDR and World War II Espionage,” 2001

Pine, L.G., “Tales of the British Aristocracy,” 1956

Pipes, Richard, “The Russian Revolution,” 1990

Preston, Paul, “The Spanish Civil War,” 1986

Radzinsky, Edvard, “The Last Czar,” 1992

Radzinsky, Evdard, “Stalin,” 1998

Raico, Ralph, “Great Wars & Great Leaders,” 2010

Rayfield, Donald, “Stalin and his Hangmen,” 2004

Reed, Douglas, “Disgrace Abounding,” 1939

Rosenberg, Alfred, “Myth of the Twentieth Century,” 1935

Service, Robert, “Lenin, A Biography,” 2000

Showalter, Dennis E., “Tannenberg: Clash of Empires,” 1991

Simpson, Colin, “The Lusitania,” 1972

Slezkine, Yuri, “The Jewish Century,” 2004

Solzhenitsyn, Alexander, “The Gulag Archipelago,” 1973

Sontag, Raymond J., “A Broken World 1919-1939: The Rise of Modern Europe,” 1971

Stinnett, Robert B., “Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor,” 2000

Sutton, Anthony C., “Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution,” 1974

Tannehill, Evelyne, “Abandoned and Forgotten,” 2006, a tale of a nine year old girl orphaned in East Prussia by the war, and left to fend for herself.

Taylor, A.J, P., “The Origins of the Second World War,” 1996

Taylor, Frederick, “Dresden,” 2004

Ungvary, Krisztian, “The Siege of Budapest:100 Days in World War II,” 2002

Waydenfeld, Stefan, “The Ice Road: An Epic Journey From the Stalinist Labor Camp,” 1999

Webster, Nesta, “Germany and England,” 1938

Wilton, Robert, “The Last Days of the Romanovs,” 1920

Viola, Lynne, “The Unknown Gulag: The Lost World of Stalin’s Special Settlements,” 2007




[END of Book]




*Special thanks to reader “mblaine” for providing the text of this book.

PDF Notes

Version 1

* Total words = 5,738

* Total A4 pages = xx

*Total images = 1

Notes: Images not in original book are indicated as “[Add. image]” (Additional image).

Text in [square brackets] is not part of the original book.




Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB).


(Available later)








[Click image to enlarge]


Click on a link to go to another part:


Part 01Cover text; About the Author; Preface; Chapter 1: The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation

Part 02 — Chapter 2: Aftermath of the War in Germany

Part 03 — Chapter 3: The Jewish Factor in the War

Part 04 — Chapter 4: The Russian Revolution of 1917

Part 05 — Chapter 5: The Red Terror

Part 06 — Chapter 6: The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads Throughout Europe

Part 07 — Chapter 7: The Nation of Israel

Part 08 — Chapter 8: Jews in Weimar Germany

Part 09 — Chapter 9: Hitler and National Socialists Rise to Power

Part 10 — Chapter 10: National Socialism vs Communism

Part 11 — Chapter 11: Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany

Part 12 — Chapter 12: The Nazis and the Zionists Actually Work Together for Jewish Emigration out of Germany

Part 13 — Chapter 13: Life in Germany Under Hitler

Part 14 — Chapter 14 & 15: Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory; The 1936 Olympics

Part 15 — Chapter 16: Anschluss” The Unification of Austria and Germany

Part 16 – Chapter 17: Germany Annexes the Sudetenland

Part 17 – Chapter 18: War with Poland

Part 18 – Chapter 19: The Phony War

Part 19 – Chapter 20: Germany invades France – The Phony War Ends

Part 20 – Chapter 21: The Allied Goal? Destruction of Germany!

Part 21 – Chapter 22: Germany as Victim

Part 22 (last) – Chapter 23: Winners and Losers




See also:


The Myth of German Villainy: Author Ben Bradberry Interview — TRANSCRIPT






Version History


Version 5:


Version 4:


Version 3:


Version 2: Jul 7, 2020 — Added new See Also image and link.


Version 1: Jul 6, 2020 — Created post.

Posted in Banksters, Bk - The Myth of German Villainy, Britain, British Empire, Christainity, Churchill, Communism, Europe, Germany, Hitler, Jew World Order, Jewish Supremacism, Jews - Tool of, National Socialism, New World Order, Propaganda - Anti-German, Revisionism, Third Reich, Traitors - Politicians, Transcript, Western Civilization, WW II | 3 Comments

Morgoth’s Review – Edward Bernays – The Group and The Herd – Jul 1, 2020 — Transcript

[Morgoth reviews a section of Edward Bernays’ book “Crystallizing Public Opinion” where Bernays discusses the methods to manipulate established public opinion, where he used them to successfully convert the female population to take up smoking. Morgoth suggests that the same methods can be used by the dissident Right to bring more people to our side.




Morgoth’s Review


Edward Bernays


The Group and the Herd


Jul 1, 2020




Click here for the video:



Published on Jul 1, 2020


YouTube Description


31.7K subscribers
Buy me a pint here






Thanks to Theberton for the intros and outros








[Intro music and imagery by Theberton.]




Hello there folks. On a recent video, the Civilization one, I took a look at history through the prism of technology. That technology was the driving force of history. Played around with that idea and took away a lot of where that’s going to lead us, where it is leading us. And in that I kind of side-lined the idea that there’s people pulling strings and manipulating people according to a certain plan, and that kind of thing.



And I wanted sort of go right back in that direction on this one. And look at, in this case it’s a book I’ve been reading by Edward Bernays. So Edward Bernays is the nephew of Sigmund Freud, similar ((((heritage))), of course, and he has a few books, which I’ve been reading his one called “Crystallizing Public Opinion”.


And Bernays went from Austria to America, and once he got there he began to apply the thinking of Sigmund Freud psychology, of course, psychoanalysis. And Bernays wasn’t interested in it at the individual level, so much as he was in mass manipulation. How you can use psychoanalysis and psychology to play on the fears and manipulate the masses. And he’s written some books about it. And one of them which I’m reading is called “Crystallizing Public Opinion”. In particular, Part Two, which is called “The Group and the Herd”. And Chapter One, “What Constitutes Public Opinion”.



So people may know of Bernays from Adam Curtis documentary, “Century of the Self”, which is a brilliant documentary. But Curtis’ documentary is looking at how Capital did this, how they molded the public and public perception. It touches on the Frankfurt School.


But Bernie’s runs alongside of that. Obviously similar background, but he’s not coming at it from the neo-Marxist, or whatever you want to call, side of it. It’s about psychology. But the effects of it on discourse, and on the West, beginning with America, are very similar.


So the problem that what Bernays is going to do here is look for ways at the public and the opinions of a public and how they view the world can be manipulated. And he ended up working for cigarette companies, big money. And then eventually what you could call like the sort of the “proto-deep state”. So and in his book “Crystallizing Public Opinion” and the other one which is just called “Propaganda”, he’s really like straight out saying like:


“This is what we do!”


It’s really surprising just reading how balls-out it is, how in your face it is! He’s not trying to hide anything.


But what I found interesting about the chapter “What Constitutes Public Opinion” is that Bernays is going to approach the problem of how you manipulate the masses. And he’s going to raise a few issues, which I think can resonate with people in dissident Right circles today. Because I think that when you mention somebody like Bernays, or you mentioned people like Horkheimer, Adorno, there’s this knee-jerk reaction to, sort of, they’re just like bogeyman! And there’s too few people looking into the text that what it is they’re actually saying. And I like this idea of demystifying them and their ideas. And in some cases they’re actually approaching problems which people in the dissident Right are focused with.



And you can see it with Bernays straight away, because the problem that he’s, what I find interesting in this chapter, is he’s gonna come up with a problem that if you want to, let’s say from his perspective it would be to red pill the masses. But the problem that he comes up against is that the masses have already been programmed. Somebody’s already been there and done it. And he says they’re getting their opinions from the radio at this time, from the newspapers, from the church, from the schools. And so, they’ve got this “deadwood” that needs to be cleared away. And he wants to figure out how that can be done. And he’s gonna play around with a lot of ideas here.




But what’s interesting is that you can see here this idea that we’re all rational liberals. And that we all form our opinions based on our own reason, is actually complete rubbish! He doesn’t believe that at all! And he sees it again, and again, and again! And so for an example there’s this part where he says:


“The religious man accuses the atheist of being shallow and irrational, and is met by a similar reply. To the Conservative, the amazing thing about the Liberal is his incapacity to see reason and accept the only possible solution of public problems. Examination reveals the fact that the differences are not due to the commission of the mere mechanical fallacies of logic, since these are easily avoided, even by the politician. And since there is no reason to believe that one party in such controversies is less logical than the other.”


And so what he means is that people already have their own preconceptions and their own biases about the world that they’ve already been programmed, and that you can’t talk them out of them.


Now this is something that’s going to resonate with a lot of people who watch this video, because we run up against this every day. We talk about how do you red pill normies, how do you red pill the masses, how do you convince them of our opinions? And again, and again, we come back to the problem that they’ve already had another set of ideas, and another set of biases, handed to them by the media. It’s just the media today is much more sophisticated than in Bernays’ time.


But nevertheless he’s still touching on something, which is very similar. And he goes on to say:


“The difference is due rather to the fundamental assumptions of the antagonists being hostile, and these assumptions are derived from herd-suggestions.”


Now as I showed in the title he again, again, and again, throughout what I’ve been reading by him, he’s got nothing but contempt for the masses, and he literally calls them “a herd”. And it’s about how you manipulate the herd. And there’s a famous passage somewhere where he says:


“All of your opinions and what you think of as your take on the world, is literally being written elsewhere by people that you’ve never heard of!”


And it’s as if Bernays wants to get in on the action. And he is actually hired to do this. But we’re going to get into an example of that later, and the most famous one, of course, now:


“To the Liberal certain basic conceptions have acquired the quality of instinctive truth, have become a priori syntheses, because of the accumulated suggestions to which he has been exposed; and a similar explanation applies to the atheist, the Christian, and the Conservative. Each, it is important to remember, finds in consequence the rationality of his position flawless and is quite incapable of detecting in it the fallacies which are obvious to his opponent, to whom that particular series of assumptions has not been rendered acceptable by herd suggestion.”


So what he’s getting at here is that if you think that the basic standard — in Britain that would be the Conservative voter and then the Liberal, the Labour voter — they both have their own fundamental truths and it’s handed to them by the media that they consume, by the church, or in the Left it would be the University, and then so on. So they are forming their opinions and then they belong to a herd, and then that herd reinforces all of those opinions. And even when you show them something, which is flat-out wrong, they will merely sort of fall back on, and draw from their own sources, to create the narrative all of their own.



And so Bernays is interested, because he needs to change this. So, at this point, he is faced with the same problem that dissident people do. And he goes on:


“Thus the public relations counsel, …”


He’s talking about basically being the deep state, the public relations counsel, as he calls it. There’s this kind of interconnection between the American government and big money, as there is today. Much more so today, in fact, largely based on some of the ideas that Bernays got into. So this:


“Public relations counsel has to consider that a priori judgment of any public he deals with before counseling any step that would modify those things in which the public has an established belief.”



So what he’s saying here is that when you hit them directly with counter evidence, facts which run against the grain of their narrative, they just reject them. This is the problem that he’s facing.:


“It is seldom effective to call names, or to attempt to discredit the beliefs themselves. The counsel on public relations, after examination of the sources of established beliefs, must either discredit the old authorities, or create new authorities by making articulate a mass opinion against the old belief, or in favor of the new, … The average citizen is the world’s most efficient censor. His own mind is the greatest barrier between him and the facts. His own ‘logic-proof compartments,’ his own absolutism, are the obstacles which prevent him from seeing in terms of experience and thought rather than in terms of the group.”




So, what Bernays is saying here, is that when you’re directly antagonistic to these people, if you just, obviously as he says, calls them names, or if you just trash their arguments outright, it isn’t actually very productive.


What you do instead — there’s two parts to this — there’s, you have to speak from authority, which is nigh on impossible. But, if you get a large enough presence on social media, or you form your own political party, you can reframe these things where you’re speaking to somebody’s gut instincts, rather than just being negative.


And the second part of that, is that you don’t antagonize them. And so you’re speaking from authority. And then the second part is that you give them a new narrative upon which they can not trash their old opinions, that will come later, instead what you’re doing is supplanting one narrative, one worldview, with your own.


And this is what Bernays perfected. This is what’s being done so successfully in the West. And you can see it just in the riots and all of the trouble going on for the last few months. And as I’ve said, like ad nauseam on this channel, to be honest, it’s all backed up by all of these PR companies, advertising agencies. You can see how it all links together. It’s just that it’s much more sophisticated now than in Bernays’ time. But here’s the man who is widely regarded to have come up with it all. And he’s got some very interesting books about it.



So, what he’s most famous for is the cigarette advertising campaign, where he was hired by a few different companies. And the problem that they had was that women in America, it was considered taboo for women in America to smoke cigarettes. Now this is a problem, because it means that essentially that big business have lost half of the potential buyers of cigarettes, which is a hell of a lot of money! And they hired Bernays to come up with PR campaigns and advertising techniques, where they could get women smoking.


And so just to go back on the earlier point that he was making there, the one thing that you could do is to hit the taboos dead on. But that would antagonize them. So, he’s gonna use his own techniques here. And eventually what he came up with this idea. If you look at all of the — on Google Images as I did — all of the pictures, the advertisements being used of women, are just women with a cigarette. And the “torches of freedom” as they called it.


The women in the advertisements, they don’t have a husband there, or a man. They don’t have a father figure. They aren’t portrayed as daughters, and they don’t have children. There’s just the women! Just a woman. And the narrative which is being given to them is that they are now “free”! They are now “liberated” and it’s a positive vision, something for them to aspire to.


And I’ll describe this Wikipedia page:


“Because it should appear as, …”


This is Bernays:


“Because it should appear as news with no division of the publicity, actresses should be definitely out.”


He wants to make this look normal:


“On the other hand, if young women who stand for feminism someone from the Woman’s Party say — could be secured, the fact that the movement would be advertised too, would not be bad, … While they should be good-looking, they should not be too ‘model-y’. Three for each church covered should be sufficient. Of course, they are not to smoke, simply as they come down the church steps. They are to join in the Easter Parade, puffing away.”



So it’s not to be connected with the traditional family, because that’s the old narrative. He doesn’t want to hit it straight on. Instead, he’s creating a NEW vision and a NEW image and it will be of the woman alone, liberated from men! The feminist movement is just coming in here. You see that big business, big capital, is absolutely on board with what would be perceived as being a left-wing movement, a feminist movement! And you can see that they complement each other perfectly.


And that the image of the woman with a cigarette is kind of like a crypto, proto-feminist image. And yet, it’s coming from big capital.




This leaves us onto something else, because it’s been a hot topic recently in dissident Right circles where people have been much more vocal in attacking big money, big capitalism, because it was standard to say, well, lay all of this squarely at the foot of Marxism. And then to say the end result will be that we all live in, … Basically they’re going to deconstruct everything about Western civilization, all of our norms, all of our traditions, and they will then bring in the Communist revolution.


And yet here we have Bernays, and as I say, in literature, and so on, he often runs alongside the Frankfurt School. He has the same (((heritage))) and he is a kind of a foreigner to America. And that means he can stand outside of the normal cultural fabric and attack it, and undermine it, and study it, from that perspective, which is more difficult if you’re a native and you’re submerged in it.


But you can see here that the problem is that big money, big capital, employed him to subvert the values, just in the cigarette advertisements here. There was more. And I think I’m gonna do more videos on this, as well. I just want to focus on this little part here.



You can see here that it was corporations who hired him to study how you can then begin to break down these more conservative, more traditional, values and all of that they can open up what was then half of the market of America, which was women. And needless to say, tens of millions of women will have died of lung cancer, because of this. And Bernays himself was adamantly opposed to smoking and I didn’t want his wife to smoke either. But later on in his life he did get on board the anti-smoking thing.


But the point here is that this is a cultural value, a cultural more which was a good one, and it was a healthy one. And it was abolished. And feminism went alongside big money here. So we have to have a closer look at the role that big capital, high finance, has played in the current state of the West today. And it triggers a lot of people, because you’re going to be called a Marxist, you’re gonna be called, you know, you’re just a communist. But nevertheless we have here a clear example of capital hiring somebody to break down the mores and values, to open up markets.


And we can see this happening again, and again, and again, in fact. Mass immigration will be another one.


But just to get back to the basic narrative which is an interesting one for this particular chapter here. When we get into the how we kind of confront people, if you want to use Bernays, or if you’re in a dissident movement, you can whittle his advice down to three different points.


And it’s number one, don’t antagonize. Number two, replace the source. And, three, use the source to replace the narrative.


So you have to get into a position where you can dish out your narrative. You do not have to be completely antagonistic to everybody else around you. It’s actually why I find debates to be a waste of time, because it’s exactly what Bernays is talking about with the sort of Left-Right dichotomy. Everybody is just gonna dig in to their own trenches. You’re not going to get anywhere. If you opened up a third trench, a “third position”,  you might say.



But when you’re deliberately antagonistic all it does is reinforce people’s beliefs and they’re going to get on the defensive. You replace the source, obviously, so you you can peddle your narrative.


And then instead of being completely antagonistic, you just replace the narrative, you know, with your own, which is followed by words that are positive, or speaking some sort of fundamental truth. And then you’ll find that people from elsewhere will move towards you.


This is an interesting way to look at this, in how you manage the masses. But what’s most interesting is that you can get rid of all of these liberal preconceptions that all of the people, all of the normies, have all arrived at their positions through their own reason. It’s not the case.


And the people who control the discourse, the people who control the culture, and set the running here, they know it as well! The only people who think they’ve arrived at their own opinions, that we live in this society where everybody is rational, and everybody has come to their understanding of the world through their own volition, is completely deluded!


And when we can just step over these false preconceptions about the world we might actually get somewhere.


So I think I’m gonna carry on reading this and do another video, because I think we need more stuff like this.


So, thanks for listening folks, and I’ll catch you later.




[Outro music and imagery by Theberton.]













See Also





Millennium Woes with Morgoth on Brexit — TRANSCRIPT

Millennial Woes’ Millenniyule 2017 No. 66 – Morgoth — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – YouTube Hangout 01 – Skeptics and Cucks — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – YouTube Hangout 02 – Merry Holocaustmas — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review — Discussing the Government’s Anti-Extremism Agency ”Prevent” With Based British — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review — Hate-Reading The Guardian – Hirsch, Critical Theory & Nihilism, Jan 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review — The Psychotic Left, Feb 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – Fishing For White Pills, Feb 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – Hope Not Hate and the State of Play, Feb 2019 — TRANSCRIPT





PDF Notes

* Total words = 3,308

* Total images = 16

* Total A4 pages = xx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)


Version History


Version 4:


Version 3:


Version 2:


Version 1: Jul 5, 2020 — Published post.

Posted in Edward Bernays, Feminism, Goebbels, Jews, Liberalism, Marxism, Mind Control, Morgoths Review, Propaganda, Transcript, Western Civilization | Leave a comment

TOO – Andrew Joyce’s Podcast – Talmud and Taboo — Part 01 – Jun 30, 2020 — Transcript

[The is the first of hopefully many podcasts from The Occidental Observer contributor and scholar Andrew Joyce on the “jewish problem/question“, titled “Talmud and Taboo“.

The problem is that Orgjew engages in activities that are deeply hostile to the West while at the same time constantly attempting to hide and deny that fact, as part of its strategy of long-term White genocide and the creation of a Jew World Order.


[Cover image — The bottom image is the painting: “The Conjurer,” painted by Hieronymus Bosch. The painting accurately displays a performer doing the cups and balls routine, which has been practiced since Egyptian times. The shell game does have some origins in this old trick. The real trick of this painting is the pickpocket who is working for the conjurer. The pickpocket is robbing the spectator who is bent over.

The top painting: Talmud Readers by Adolf Behrman.

Overlaid on the painting is the jewish star.]


The Occidental Observer


Andrew Joyce’s Podcast


Talmud and Taboo

Part 1


June 29, 2020




Click here for the audio:



[Jul 3, 2020 — The audio is no longer available at Spreaker — taken down by Spreaker]



But, you can listen to the podcast here:



Published on Jun 29, 2020


TOO Description


First published at 15:27 UTC on June 29th, 2020.

Editor’s note: Andrew Joyce has undertaken to do a podcast series, Talmud and Taboo. Enjoy!






Barbara Lerner SPECTRE:


“I think there’s a resurgence of anti-semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural, and I think we’re gonna be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place!

Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that.

[She continues: It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.]”


[Image] Jewish activist Barbara Lerner Spectre, second from left.






Hello and welcome to “Talmud and Taboo”! The podcast voted most likely to be banned, destroyed, censored, and eliminated within the next 24 hours!


I am your host, Andrew Joyce. Podcast host voted most likely to be arrested within the next 24 hours! Thank you for joining me.


It’s been interesting 24 hours. I looked on with horror at the banning of Richard Spencer’s NPI/Radix podcast channel. And in a way it has prompted me to move into the area of audio-visual presentation of my material.


For those of you familiar with my work this is quite a big departure from what you are used to. I’ve written over 200 essays or articles now for the Occidental Observer dot net, where I have worked closely with Dr Kevin MacDonald, who I am sure everyone is familiar with. And for those of you who aren’t familiar with my work I tend to focus on the “jewish question“. I would suppose 90%, if not more, of my essays concern that topic.


I look to build upon, expand, and maybe in some areas, to take a new direction to the jewish Question as Dr Kevin MacDonald. And I’ve done a couple of podcasts over the years, but it’s not something that I’ve done consistently. To be honest it is not something that I really enjoy doing. I’m much more of a text based activist. I enjoy reading and digging deep in a sort of analytical way. I don’t really get as much enjoyment out of discussing these things verbally, but I understand the importance of doing. So, this is something that I’m now going to devote a little bit more time to.



The last 24 hours have been interesting, as I say, it has prompted this move. The censorship which probably began actually before Charlottesville, just before Charlottesville, has just steadily accelerated over time to the point where it’s almost like every time it looks like this movement, whether you want to call it the dissident right, the Third Position, whatever, every time it starts to build up a little bit of momentum again, something comes in to destroy it. It can be disheartening, it can be frustrating, it can be morale sapping.


So, in this particular instance I’ve decided to throw another voice out there. I’ve decided to create another podcast. It maybe in this giant game of left-wing wack-a-mole, this podcast is destroyed relatively quickly. I will save the podcast that I record for posterity. I will attempt to put them up on different platforms as required.


I don’t know what Spreaker is like in terms of censorship. I’m going to give this a go and see how long the podcast can stay up for. I’m just testing the waters. I’m going to test the waters for a section of the podcasts to see if it fulfills any role within the movement at all. To see how it is received by people out there, whether you are a non-shit poster on Twitter, or whether you are Richard Spencer, or whether you are Kevin MacDonald. I want to see how people react to the podcast to see if it’s useful, and we will take it from there.


In terms of a broader picture of what this podcast is meant to do, we all have some baseline knowledge of the jewish Question. This isn’t going to be harping on familiar talking points. I want to get back to intellectual basics, but I also want to take things in a deeper level. I want to get into the philosophy, get into the economics, into the social and political aspects of jewish Question in a really challenging way. To look at the most complex aspects of this issue.


And also, if I can introduce a little bit of entertainment value! It’s not my forte as you can tell from my essays – we tend to be deadly serious and sincere. But I’ll make it as entertaining as possible. I do think that helps to get some messages across.


In terms of the current movement as I see it, there’s a lot of content out there that is philosophical. There’s a lot of content out there with heavy critiques of neo-liberalism, capitalism, communism, woke leftism. All of that is fantastic! I appreciate all of that content. I agree with so much of it.


But what I have noticed is a definite drift away from discussions of the jewish Question, in and of itself. Perhaps this is fatigue, perhaps we don’t know how to transition from a [word unclear] where we have looked at it predominately through the lens of a kind of humour. There has been a lot of shit-posting about Jews, concerning Jews, over the last four or five years in particular. But I have noticed a fatigue set in.


The Daily Stormer – A Normie’s Guide to the Alt-Right


I did notice – and I find it very interesting that Andrew Anglin deleted the jewish problems section from the Daily Stormer – I think that is symptomatic of the drift away from the discussing this topic again. And it is something in a later podcast I am going to dissect and discuss, because I do think this is an interesting development, in and of itself – I have some ideas about it. And I think we need to look into as to why that has happened.


But, for the time being I think we should come right back to basics and we should look into the problems we are facing right now, and then we kind of just move from there, and we do look back at history and engage in as much comparative work as possible.


It can be difficult right now, at the present moment, to actually see where the jewish influence is coming from, where it’s going, what are its motivations, what are its techniques and methods.


With the banning of NPI/Radix from YouTube I see a lot of commentary online:


“Oh! It’s the CEO of YouTube. And what’s going on with the board there. And who are these anonymous people making these banning decisions and what have you within YouTube.”


YouTube, just like Twitter, Google, whatever it might be, the problems don’t end there. These people are acting on legislative proposals, policy recommendations, and really dubious, and in many cases false reports. Developed [?] organizations like the Anti-Defamation League, like the Southern Poverty Law Center, which probably since 2013, 2014, have been working on restricting free speech. This is a policy development, this is a form of activism that is probably, in a real and immediate sense, about six, or seven years old.


But really the tradition of jewish efforts to restrict free speech probably goes back almost a century, at least! And that is if you want to discount efforts in the Middle Ages, or the early modern period. And the early modern early period in terms of limiting the freedoms of non-jews just by working closely with elites in order to stymie conversation and smother dissent about Jewish activism.



So this is a part of a longer trajectory, and we really need to look at the bigger picture. I think in one of the early podcasts we do we will actually look at some of the policy movers and shakers. They are normally jewish. Some of them are actually Israeli, even. And they tend to have an academic, some media, background. And we will look into some of the proposals that were made, when they were made.


And we will try and track how these initial jewish moves have resulted in the fact that most of these big tech companies have more or less just rolled over and shown their belly. They are completely submissive. The trend and trajectory of culture right now is to just submit to the full force of censorship demands in the name of “woke” leftism, defending supposedly oppressed minorities. And in many cases this is going to get a lot worse. It’s going to go really widespread.


So I want to pick up on that with one of the earlier podcasts. And then we’ll move from that to the issue of jewish influence as a whole.


Right now I think as we set off in this first short, brief podcast, is just to say:


“Well what is the jewish Question?”


I’m assuming if most of you have tuned in to this in the first place that you already know my work, which means you already know a great deal about the jewish Question. But if you are completely new to this issue, the only thing to say at this point is:


“What is the jewish Question?”


Well, it’s two questions. The first question is:


“Are jews a cohesive group?”


The second question is:


“Does that group have out-sized or disproportionate influence, and is that influence harmful to the majority population, the host population?”


In terms of the first question we look at parallel narratives here, parallel realities in some sense. On the one hand jews are most definitely a group! They self describe as a group, they organize as a group. Every thing they do demonstrates group behaviour. The diaspora and Israel are symbiotically linked. This is disavowed and denied by jews the world over, but we know that it is linked!


We know that support flows from the diaspora, political, financial, even in terms of morale. There are different forms of support that flow from the diaspora to Israel. And in a way, we could argue that Israel simply couldn’t survive without the diaspora. That is why the Jewish state was never going to be a solution to the jewish problem. That is why more than half a decade, approaching a century, I suppose, in a couple of decades from the founding of the state of Israel we still have a major jewish problem around the world.


The nexus of that problem may have shifted slightly from Europe to the United States, but it remains a very, very, powerful Western problem. The problem of jewish influence in Western society has persisted, and it will persist until we reach absolutely coherent and satisfactory conclusions!


The second question is this influence that they have out-sized? Is it out-sized? Does this group have out-sized influence? Well we can track influence numerically. We can look at the number of jewish politicians there are in our parliaments, and congresses. We can look at the number of jews that there are in really influential aspects of society, like the media, like the government, like finance, like education, like academia. We can track all of this.


And it’s quite obvious that there is an over-representation there. And we can look at it qualitatively. We can say that these members of these various spheres of society, these jewish members, most definitely advocate for jewish interests. In many cases they’re quite explicit about that.


So what’s the problem then? What’s the confusion?


Well, the confusion about the jewish problem, the reason why jewish influence is everywhere, and yet somehow nowhere, is that it is simultaneously denied. Jews will organize as a group to deny that they are a group! They will use the fact that they have organized. They will pool their resources, they will act as a group! And in doing so, use all of those group resources to deny that they are a group!


So they will disseminate an article, for example, that jews are as individualistic as anyone else, that jewish financial criminals were acting completely on their own. It has no broader ramifications with the jewish population as a whole. And so we get a kind of vicious cycle where jews repeatedly engage in group behaviour and deny it, engage in it, deny it, engage in it, deny it!


[Image] Cartoon — Son asks jewish dad for $50. (click image to enlarge)


And these tactics — which we will break down and analyze in the course of these podcast series — have been honed over the course of centuries. It’s why they are so efficient. It’s why in many cases our population is so numbed to it, and somehow so well accustomed to it. But it is everywhere in our education, it’s everywhere in our culture. And that is why so many people are blind to what’s going on in front of them.


One of the goals of these podcasts is to present bite-sized chunks of material, perhaps with each episode focusing on a case study which kind of opens up a much broader aspect of the problem. We can kind of zoom in, we can put something under the microscope and we can say:


“Right, here is an example of jewish influence.”


So, this is the goal of the podcast. Thank you for listening.


As we get under way I look forward to journeying this project together. I don’t know how long it’s going to last. It might last a day, it might last a week. Those of you that followed my stuff on Twitter will see that it was kind of “blaze of glory” type stuff! We ran with it, we got a lot done! Someone flagged it up and I was never able to come back. I saw a Twitter post the other day, someone said:


“When is Joyce coming back? He bestrode the Twittersphere like a giant!”


Those days are over. I’m not coming back. I can’t get into Twitter. I have tried. They are looking out for me. They are keeping an eye on me. It’s not going to happen.


But this is something new and, look, if they have to chase me all over the internet, trying to ban these podcasts, at least it consumes a little bit of energy, on their part. So, I’m happy to do this. I hope everyone enjoys it.


And thank you for tuning in.










See Also


David Duke Interviews Dr Andrew Joyce — TRANSCRIPT


Red Ice Radio: Dr Andrew Joyce – The History of Jewish Influence — TRANSCRIPT (Part 1)
Red Ice Radio: Dr Andrew Joyce – The History of Jewish Influence — TRANSCRIPT (Part 2)

Barbara Lerner Spectre







PDF Notes


  • Total words = 2,738
  • Total images = 12
  • Total A4 pages = xx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):
(Available later)



Version History


Version 5: Jul 9, 2020 — Updated Cover.

Version 4: Jul 4, 2020 — Added “Transcripts Matter Project” message. Added 2 images (Anglin).

Version 3: Jul 3, 2020 — Added note that the audio has been taken down at Spreaker. Added 1 image. Added the audio file.

Version 2: Jul 2, 2020 — Improved formatting. Added 4 images.

Version 1: Jul 1, 2020 — Published post.

Posted in Andrew Anglin, Andrew Joyce, Anti-Defamation League, Barbara Spectre, Charlottesville, Israel, Jew World Order, Jewish Problem/Question, Jewish Supremacism, Jews - Hostile Elite, Jews - Lying, Jews - Naming, Talmud, Transcript, Twitter, Western Civilization, White genocide, YouTube Censorship | 2 Comments

Morgoth’s Review – ”Cracka” Is Anti-White Filth – Jun 29, 2020 — Transcript

[Morgoth reviews the trailer for the upcoming Amazon movie “Cracka”, portraying an alternative American history where blacks enslave Whites and where a White man, a “neo-Nazi”, is shown all the love and kindness that blacks are capable of when they have the whip hand.

As Morgoth points out, this is black torture porn, and will undoubtedly prompt some ferals to kill and maim Whites. Another point raised is how this movie coincides with the current BLM anarchy that is being promoted by the (((media))) to create conflict and stoke the anti-White narrative.




Morgoth’s Review


“Cracka” is Anti-White Filth


June 29, 2020



Click here for the video:



Published on Jun 29, 2020


BitChute Description


First published at 15:27 UTC on June 29th, 2020.

Morgoth’s Review

7412 subscribers

Thanks to everyone who supports my work




Thanks to Theberton for the intros and outros







[Intro music and imagery by Theberton.]





Hello there again there folks. Quite a few people have asked if I would take a look at this new trailer for this new Amazon Prime movie called “Cracka”, which is related to that slur for White Americans, especially the South, I think. And I don’t like this, but I kind of know where people are coming from. And this is the latest in a new genre that with see emerging in the mainstream media, which is basically “torture porn”. We get to see White people racially humiliated, raped, and enslaved. And just generally trashed!


And in this one the gist of it is that a supposed White supremacist goes back, gets magically transported back, to an alternative universe, and an alternative history where White people are enslaved, where black people enslave White people. So it’s the other way around, and you get to see them enact all this sadistic, … Think of it as a sadistic revenge story.


And I just want to go through the trailer a little bit. I’m not going to use rolling footage because they will probably come after us for copyright. But you can see, like it says:


“You took our breath away.”


This is what comes up at the start. And so there is a clear reference to what’s going on with George Floyd, and with all of the trouble in America right now.


So they are tuned in, it’s got a clear political conscious. So this isn’t just a fantasy. It isn’t just “let’s have this tongue in cheek crazy comedy”. They are clearly linked in what’s going on. They have probably just cobbled that together before they threw the trailer up, because it relates directly to what is happening in the real world. So they can’t say:


“Well, it’s all just fun and games. It’s just a crazy movie!”


It’s got a clear political conscious.


So then it goes on and it says:


“What if we took yours?”


In other words:


“You killed us! What if we kill you?”


This is where we are. It beggars belief, but we’ll get onto that in a little bit.


And in the background there’s a mugging or something. There’s White people being terrible to black people in the trailer. It just says:


“You raped our daughters.”


When did that happen? What are you talking about? What is this? We don’t know. But it’s just to demonize White people:


“What if we raped yours?”


So now we get the threat. Mainstream media folks. This is the mainstream media now.


And what you find they do, so this is the main character being introduced. That, when previously may have seemed a little bit on the nose, a little bit too much and it might get a lot of White people, … In all fairness this did get trashed, but it’s not good enough for me. I think it should be banned! I’m not a liberal.


So what they have done here is that they have introduced the main character, and because it may be a little bit too much for a lot of White people they are going to have him plastered in the “demon symbol” itself, the symbol of satan! The swastika.


In popular culture they know that when you do that, it’s like a stamp that says that anything goes for this person now. This person is evil, this person deserves absolutely everything that is coming 3 him. He then gets transported back to where he is the slave, and he gets treated like dirt and a lot worse off the African-American masters, slave masters in the past. So it’s switched upside down.


But really they have to put the symbol on there because if it was just the case of a White guy, then it would be a bit too much. They are not going to risk doing that yet. So what they are doing here is dirtying the well. But only just a little bit, because you will see in the trailer they make it clear that he’s actually a Donald Trump voter. So this is just the avatar of White America. It’s just White America. The “Nazis” are there to poison the well.


What they are saying is that if you vote for Trump, if you are a Whiteman and you are not guilt ridden and suicidal, like all these loony tunes we are seeing now, then you are a White supremacist and you deserve to go back in our alternative history and be enslaved and be degraded.


And the reason that I know that they have put the swastika as kind of symbol, just to sort of demonize and make it acceptable, because just a little while later you’ll find that there’s White women being raped by the black slave masters. And this is the trailer by the way. This is what the audience is actually going to see, rather than someone sieg heiling, and all of the rest of it.


So what it comes down to is just humiliation, dehumanization and like a genocidal hateful wrath against not what they are pretending, that is bullshit! This is against European people! And this is the media. This is what is now going up in the mainstream media.


Now, the funny thing is, like I said I would have this banned. And they would say:


“What the hell is it? It’s just content, you know! It’s just entertainment! It’s just a joke, bro!”


But the fact is, “stochastic terrorism” is a thing. And this is what they want. So let’s say that you have a YouTube channel and you are complaining about certain groups, certain groups of migrants, or somebody because of their religious background, or what have you, then even if you don’t say it directly, even if you are being vague about it, they can say that you are a “stochastic terrorist”!


The Christchurch killer, he is said to be brainwashed and stirred up because of what he saw on the internet. And the actual definition is:


“That stochastic terrorism model is a stochastic process, a random model of those terror attacks intended by the random nature of their timing and targets to excite a generalized fear.”


So the attacks are random. And what I’m getting at here is that because of this garbage, I can say with certainty that White people are going to die because of this propaganda, because of this product. Because this is going on, this is going to have the effect on certain demographics — being careful, of course — who are going to watch this and they going to go out and kill White people because of this product.


And they can say:


“Well this is just crazy talk, you know? We are all free individuals.”


But they don’t use that argument when it’s somebody on YouTube whose complaining about various issues related to multiculturalism. Then that is “Stochastic Terrorism”! So how’s the fuck is this not “Stochastic Terrorism” against White people?


And this is not somebody on YouTube with a Yeti microphone practicing his editing and he gets a few thousand views.


This is the mainstream media! This is going in the cinemas, this is going on the TV shows. This particular one is going on Amazon. So what do you do when, … Because I do believe that stochastic terrorism is a thing, because I don’t actually grant individuals with that much agency. I’m not liberal. So yeah, I think there’s some soft minded people who will go out and do crazy shit! I’ll say that happens in the Right as well.


But what do you do when that is coming from the mainstream media? What happens when this is the actual mainstream media content of your civilization is stirring up, directing people to dehumanize and murder White people! What can you do? Can you write a petition?


And this is not even to mention how this product ties in with pulling down all of the statues, with White privilege theory. With how everything is institutional racism, how we have to bend the knee.


It’s very strange why this has come out. Because this must have been in production for a year, or so. Very strange that this is coming out like in a few days time. And that the trailer dropped about a month ago. So, it basically reflects what’s going to happen on the streets, as if the two are feeding into each other.


I mean, all I can suggest is that you get out of the cities, because the double standards here just leave you gobsmacked!


And we are finding our now what’s its like to be genuinely powerless. And that is what they are telling us as well, by the way. That is what this is all about. They constantly talk about when White power, institutional power.


So what happens when you lose your grip? I mean these particular institutions have never actually been in our hands for a long, long time, if ever. But at least the people who controlled it had to be a little bit careful. They couldn’t get too carried away.


This isn’t what we used to get when the, … And it’s why I detest this exploitation torture porn stuff! It’s because it’s brain dead! It’s because it’s being targetted at very low IQ kind of people. It isn’t clever in its messaging. I don’t mind the movie where I have to make my brain work to get the anti-White messaging, to figure it out, to sort of twist it around a bit like a rubik’s cube, so that you see what they are getting at.


With this, it’s just like how do you make a deep analysis of a punch in the face? It is what it is. It’s telling you straight away what it is. And it’s just hate propaganda against White people. And it is allowed. And I know that it is low-hanging fruit as well.


But you want to be kind of sophisticated, you want to raise the bar on what you talk about and what you get into. But you just have to stop for a second and say that this mainstream outlets are promoting propaganda which seems to want White people to be dead, and raped, and enslaved!


That is what coming out in the mainstream media! And it’s coming out by people who, if this was some lad on YouTube complaining about mass immigration, they would call him a “stochastic terrorist”! Even though, what they would produce, someone like the Iconoclast who got banned, it would be nowhere near the level of this! Nowhere near as explicitly hateful!


So, it’s just pure filth!


So, all we can do here, … I mean I’m going to try and wrap it up on a more happy note. It’s really the old judo technique, where you can say to your family and your friends:


“Look at what’s actually coming out in the media. There’s something not right here! This isn’t normal anymore.”


And it’s not going to stop. This is the new genre that is been coming out since Django Unchained.


So when the propaganda is this in your face, you can begin to tell people and say:


“Look, I know you want to be gentle and I know you want to love the world and everything, but you are going to have to get fucking real! Because this is getting really bad!”


So I’ll try and do a happier one next time folks. I’ll catch you later.






[Outro music and imagery by Theberton.]










See Also





Millennium Woes with Morgoth on Brexit — TRANSCRIPT

Millennial Woes’ Millenniyule 2017 No. 66 – Morgoth — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – YouTube Hangout 01 – Skeptics and Cucks — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – YouTube Hangout 02 – Merry Holocaustmas — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review — Discussing the Government’s Anti-Extremism Agency ”Prevent” With Based British — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review — Hate-Reading The Guardian – Hirsch, Critical Theory & Nihilism, Jan 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review — The Psychotic Left, Feb 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – Fishing For White Pills, Feb 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – Hope Not Hate and the State of Play, Feb 2019 — TRANSCRIPT





PDF Notes

* Total words = 1,952

* Total images = 7

* Total A4 pages = xx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)


Version History


Version 4:


Version 3:


Version 2:


Version 1: Jun 29, 2020 — Published post.

Posted in Black Crime, Jew World Order, Jews, Jews - Hostile Elite, Marxism, Morgoths Review, Review - Movie, Traitors - Journalists, Traitors - Politicians, Transcript, White genocide | Leave a comment

White Lives Matter Banner Man Jake Hepple Stands Tall!

[Jake Hepple, with the help of others organized an aerial banner with “White Lives Matter Burnley” to be flown over a Burnley soccer match at Etihad Stadium, Manchester, UK,  a few days ago. Following the predictable anti-White media outrage at doing so, he was sacked from his job as a welder at “Paridigm Cuckcision” and was investigated by police for a committing a crime, as part of the official harassment campaign against him.

This wonderful publicity act of standing up for Whites was then followed by something equally wonderful! He refused to cuck or grovel and defiantly tweeted:

“I’d like to take this time to apologise …TO ABSOLUTELY FUCKING NOBODY!”

May Jake Hepple continue to stand tall!



To be continued, …




See Also

Laura Towler – We Were Never Asked – Oct 24, 2019 — Transcript





PDF Notes

* Total words =

* Total images = 2

* Total A4 pages = xx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)


Version History


Version 4:


Version 3:


Version 2:


Version 1: Jun 25, 2020 — Published post.


Posted in Antifa, Black Crime, Britain, Freedom of Speech, Globalism, Hate Speech, Liberalism, Multiculturalism, Nationalism, Negros, Propaganda, Race, Soccer, Thought Crime, Traitors - Journalists, Traitors - Politicians, Twitter, White genocide | 2 Comments

Dionne Moller – My Patriotic Alternative Conference Speech — Spring 2020 — Transcript

[Dionne Moller, aka, Secret Sources, gives a very graphic speech at the spring 2020 Patriotic Alternative Conference, on her experiences of when she was a police officer in Leicestershire, UK, and how that has made her understand that Islam, with its so-called “honour killings” and other barbaric practices, is incompatible with British culture and tradition.

She urges people not to balk at asking a simple question, even if you are called an “anti-semite” or a “racist“:

Who, or what, lies behind it?

She makes an impassioned call for all Whites to fight for the defense of our people, our traditions, our culture! She ends with this classic call to arms:

And we shall secure the existence of White people and a future for our White children!



NOTE: Special thanks to contributor “Alexandra” who provided this transcript.



Dionne Moller

My Patriotic Alternative

Conference Speech


Spring 2020



Click here for the video:




Published on Mar 17, 2020


Secret Sources










Mark Collett: In the last few days that our foreign speakers weren’t going to make it. And I’ve said this before, that the women in the movement are the ones that never let us down; they always show up! And this woman is like a rock in this movement! And she was at that airport, she was there, there were only 50 people there, she didn’t flinch once, I never doubted her; she has a will of iron! Please give her a round of applause she so rightly deserves!


[long applause]




Dionne Moller: Thank you. Thank you Mark, thank you for the kind words.


Hello everybody. My name is Dionne Moller, for those who don’t know me. I am a housewife.


I’ll give you a very, very short insight into my life up to now for those of you who don’t know anything about me. I was born in Leicester in England to an English father and a Danish mother. I am an ex-British police officer. I served as a Constable for Leicestershire Constabulary. I have numerous commendations received from senior officers. I have been awarded a chief constable’s commendation for outstanding service. And I am the recipient of a Bravery Award, given to me by the then Prime Minister at Number 10, Downing Street.


I moved to Denmark in 1999 when I married. I became a mother to my beautiful children, who are now young adults.


When I accepted Mark Collett’s invitation to speak at this conference I began to question myself as to what on earth I could offer to such a meeting. To be in the company of so many well-read and knowledgeable people and having to make a speech can feel a little bit intimidating. I don’t have years of political experience like Mark Collett, I am not clued up on demographics as much as Laura Towler, nor am I a deep thinker like Millennial Woes. But I don’t have to be!


What I have to be is concerned about what I see happening in the UK and in Europe. And what I have to be is concerned that my people, White people, are being replaced and will in my lifetime become a minority in their own countries.


What I have to be is concerned for my children’s future and the generations of my family to come. And so, because I am concerned about all of those things, I thought it appropriate to share an experience from my past. As I have already told you all, I was a police officer for Leicestershire Constabulary, and as such I’ve seen things that people shouldn’t see, and experienced things that have left a mark on me. Incidents that I have attended have shaped me and made me who I am today.


I will not apologize for the graphic content of this speech, because life is graphic! And it is time that we all accepted the consequences of the actions of some people in our society. Actions caused by people that have lost their moral compass, and a society that is becoming depraved and accepting of low personal and community standards. And a society that accepts the crimes caused by devout religious beliefs and customs.


Police officers often see the very worst side of human nature. And with the rise in violent crimes seen today we can literally see the decline of our society before our very eyes. Of course there will always be tragic accidents that occur. The sight of a forgotten old man dead and literally melted into a chair, and having to peel him from it, left a mark on me. As did attending an industrial accident where two men were baked alive in an industrial bread oven. Attending such incidents such as suicides by hanging, or by overdose, by self-harm or by any other manner of disposing of one’s own life, is a very normal and every day event for any police officer.


Fatal road traffic accidents, dead children, abused children, aggravated burglary, stabbings, pub brawls, rapes, car chases, theft, deception, bloated corpses floating in rivers, the result of heroin abuse, the result of alcoholism, and murder in many forms, are all signs of the decay of our society. And all have left their mark on me.




But strangely enough through the thousands of incidents I attended, I only ever shed one tear over anything I witnessed as a police officer. I did not shed a tear for any of the dead children, nor for any of the battered wives, nor for any of the rape victims or the families of the suicide victims, not for the melted man in the chair, or the men baked alive in the oven. There was only ever one tear shed because of an incident that I attended. And I will tell you about this incident, because it has plagued me and played on my mind for 25 years, and the question about why I shed that tear.


In recent months the mystery of that tear has been solved.


For the majority of my police career I worked on the Melton Road area in Leicestershire. The Melton Road is an area just outside the city centre, and was made up of a very, very large percentage of ethnic minorities: Minorities at the time; Sikhs, Hindus, Muslims and Afro-Caribbeans, all living in the same community.


One early evening I was called to an incident at an address in Melton Road. I entered a terraced house and walked up the stairs. At the top of the stairs lay a body of a middle-aged man. And he was covered in so much blood that it looked like he was wearing a burgundy coloured suit. He was dead.


I walked along the corridor to an open doorway which led into the bathroom. I stopped at the doorway and peered into what I can only describe as a slaughterhouse. I had never seen so much blood before. It was sprayed up the walls on both sides of the room, it was in puddles before my feet. There were bloody footprints and places where the feet that had trodden in the blood had slid and created smears. The sink, the toilets, and the bath, were sprayed in blood — everywhere I looked there was blood.


In this bathroom there was a window, an old style sash window; it’s frame was painted white. Slumped beneath this window was the body of a teenage girl. Her long hair was matted with blood, her slashed clothes drenched in blood. She too was dead.


What I saw next stayed with me, burned into my memory for the last 25 years, and will stay with me for the rest of my life. The white painted sash window was bloody, there was blood half way up each side of the frame and the sash was completely stained red with blood. The wooden sash had visible claw marks in it. There were bloody hand prints on the glass. These hand prints had been smeared downwards leaving a trail of blood from the middle of the panes of the glass to the bottom of the window frame. These bloody hand prints belonged to the girl who had tried to claw her way out of the window. I don’t think she had known that the window had been nailed shut.


The bloody hand prints that had created the smears down the glass were the physical remnants of a life on the verge of extinction; the girl’s last effort to escape.


An investigation was conducted and it was established that this had been a so-called “honour killing”. The dead man at the top of the stairs was the girl’s father, who after slaughtering his own daughter in a frenzied attack had killed himself. The girl had sustained 18 puncture wounds and 7 slash wounds to her torso, back and face.


The investigation concluded that the girl had gone against her religious Muslim upbringing, and had been involved in a romantic affair with a man from a lower caste.


The caste system is a division of society into distinct social classes. Economics, social status, occupation, and education levels, are some of the factors used to divide the society into castes. People from higher castes are forbidden from having romantic relationships with those from lower castes. This practice is known as Varna* and has been found in texts written more that nineteen hundred years ago. And so it was this girls’ crime to have fallen in love with the wrong person, for which she paid with her life.




When I returned home from work that evening, I shed that tear.


Twenty-five years later I now know why that tear was shed. And as harsh as it might sound, the tear was not for the dead girl. I understand now that the tear was shed for me, and for all of you. I had realized all those years ago what Islam was. I realized it was not a religion of peace, but one of cruelty and intolerance, even for it’s own people, even for it’s own children.


I have realized that these people were not like me, they did not possess the same moral compass as I did. And that they would sometimes be forced to choose between the love for their own children, or their devotion and adherence to a strict religious dogma.


My tear was one of anger and one of frustration, and one of disbelief! My tear was a symbol of the recognition that my people, my own kind, are, in the United Kingdom and in Europe, required to accept and be tolerant of religions that slaughter children, and beat, and rape women! We are taught to be tolerant when Muslim families cut off their daughters’ clitorises! And now we even have hospitals in the UK assisting in this procedure.


More than 11,000 cases of so-called “honour crime” were recorded by UK police forces from 2010 to 2014. The figures revealed 11,744 incidences of honour crimes, consisting of data from 39 out of 52 police forces in the UK, reported within a four year period. They included forced child marriage, and female genital mutilation. The Metropolitan police recorded the highest number of incidents at 2,188, followed by the West Midlands police with 1,269. Bedfordshire police with 1,106 examples recorded. South Yorkshire had 1,009 unconfirmed incidents in 2014 alone. Whilst Lancashire police had 1,049.


Society will today have us believe that diversity is progressive, that multi-culturalism is the way forward, that we should open our arms and embrace the hundreds of thousands of immigrants flooding our countries.


My view is that there is nothing progressive about the ancient, barbaric practices of Islam! There is nothing progressive about brutal machete attacks, suicide bombers, or disfiguring people with sulphuric acid!


I encourage people to look behind this wave of forced immigration to the West and ask themselves:


“Who, or what, lies behind it?”


I ask them to question the motives of the politicians who enforce and endorse mass immigration into Europe! I ask them to delve into history and find the origins of these events.


The answers to my questions are easily found, but often result in people accusing me of being “anti-semitic” and “racist”.




When I read articles in the newspapers and see videos in social media about the effects of diversity in the West, and read the negative comments left by people who have read or watched the same information, I see tears! When I read articles about the effects of political correctness, and read the angry comments from the people attached to these articles, I also see tears.


Every single angry comment is a tear! Every comment of frustration is a tear! And slowly we are all creating a type of internal bank account not filled with money, but filled with tears, filled with negative emotion.


But this fills me with hope: These negative comments, these angry and frustrated comments, are all signs of hope, because people do not have these emotions unless they care. People like Billy Charlton who made an angry speech in a northern British town about the lack of action from the Labour council over the rape of a young woman by immigrants, was jailed for 21 months. He made that speech because he cares! The comments and reactions from ordinary everyday people to the jailing of Billy Charlton were quite rightly ones of anger. The people who wrote these angry comments in response to and in support of Billy Charlton, are people who care. Every single angry comment is a drop of hope! Every single angry comment you read on YouTube videos, on Facebook, Bitchute and Twitter, about the state of the UK and Europe in relation to immigration and political correctness, is a drop of hope.


Every angry comment directed at those who kill and maim, rape and torture because of their perceived rights afforded to them by the practice of an ancient, foreign, religious custom is a drop of hope! Our internal bank accounts are filled with these drops of hope and they are brimming over. We are so full of anger and frustration that we have searched for each other, online and in real life! We feel we need to be amongst our own people. We have begun to gather together. We have begun to organise.


When the time is right we will be so organized, that each of us will be able to cash in these internal accounts for something very, very real! Our anger and our frustration can be transformed into currency, the currency of power! This war will not be won on the streets in clashes with Antifa. This war will be won politically and by the use of intelligence and timing.


When the time comes, we will be able to cash in our internal accounts for a vote. Not for the Conservatives, or the Labour party, or the Green party, but for this movement. There is no other group in the United Kingdom that talks about the cause of our current problems. There is no other group in the United Kingdom that will strive to stop the insanity we see every day on television and social media! No other group that will strive to put our people first. None!


I am sick to death of seeing videos on Twitter of our people being beaten! Sick to death of reading accounts of children being raped and nothing is done! Enquiry, after enquiry, into corruption and government dealings are held using taxpayer’s money. Months, and months, go by, year after year, and nothing is done! Enquiry, after enquiry, into Muslim rape gang scandals have been held and nobody has been held to account for the rape of the thousands, upon thousands, of raped British White girls! Nobody!


It seems to me that after every enquiry into rape gangs, or enquiries into governments are made, that more and more people are outed as criminals, rapists, abusers, and traitors. People that sit in high office, and people who should have the welfare of our people as top priority, are those who corrupt the system, or abuse our children! Promise, after promise, is made by politicians who haven’t got the spine to protect their own people! These are the people that time, and time again, are being elected into office. And enough is enough! Too many White people have suffered under the hands of these corrupt politicians! Too many of our people have suffered at the hands of diversity and inclusion!


I stand here today because I care! I care about my family. I care about you, and I care about your families. I stand here today because I will not fail my children! And I will not fail your children! We are the true defenders of the United Kingdom and Europe! And we shall ignore the hateful smears on our good characters. We should be honest about who, and what we are. We, as true nationalists shall stand together as one! We shall aid and assist our kith and kin to create strong communities! We shall uphold our high moral standards, and we shall aim to fight degeneracy in all it’s forms. We shall protect our heritage. We will not bow, or bend to Islam, or any other religion that seeks the demise of White people!


Our Christian, Catholic, and Pagan, beliefs will continue to be the prevalent faiths in the United Kingdom and Europe. And will continue to practice our customs and traditions with a sense of pride. We shall continue to fight for, and protect, the sovereignty of our European countries! We shall acknowledge and be proud or the achievements of our ancestors!


And we shall secure the existence of White people and a future for our White children!


Thank you.




[Long applause]




Mark Collett: Thank you. That was an excellent speech. And that was one of the most moving personal recollections I have ever heard. So thank you Dionne. You are truly a remarkable woman!




[* The Four Varnas — Although every Hindu must follow general moral codes, each has individual duties according to his or her own nature. These are called sva-dharma, literally “own duties.” They are regulated by the system of four varnas (social classes) and four ashrams (stages of life). The four Varnas are: Shudras (Artisans and Workers); Vaishyas (Farmers, Merchants, and Business People); Kshatriyas (Warriors, Police, and Administrators); Brahmanas (Priests, Teachers, and Intellectuals).

Islam does not recognize any castes, but, when it came to Persia and India, the existing divisions in these regions were adopted among the local Muslim societies.
Source: Https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste_system_among_South_Asian_Muslims]








See Also

Laura Towler – We Were Never Asked – Oct 24, 2019 — Transcript

Mark Collett – My Speech at the Patriotic Alternative Conference – Mar 18, 2020 — Transcript

Laura Towler – My Patriotic Alternative Spring 2020 Conference Speech – Mar 22, 2020 — Transcript

Mark Collett – My Speech at the Patriotic Alternative Conference – Mar 18, 2020 — Transcript

Dionne Moller – My Patriotic Alternative Conference Speech — Spring 2020 — Transcript




PDF Notes

* Total words = 3,092

* Total images = 4

* Total A4 pages = xx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)


Version History


Version 4:


Version 3:


Version 2: Jun 26, 2020 — Added See Also links.


Version 1: Jun 24, 2020 — Published post. Transcript provided by Alexandra.


Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

UnHerd – Malcolm Turnbull – Don’t Count Trump Out – Jun 12, 2020 — Transcript

[Freddie Sayers from Unherd interviews the former Australian Prime Minister (2015-2018) Malcolm Bligh Turnbull (born 1954) on his views on current events including the Black Lives Matter movement, China and Trump. Turnbull was a so-called moderate member of the Liberal Party, which is similar to the Conservative/Rebuplican parties in the UK/USA.

Turnbull, typical of other Australian and Western politicians, was a servant of  Organized jewry (Orgjew) — a Rhodes scholar (training ground for their servants), former Goldman Sachs guy — promoting Zionism, globalism, and especially the racial and cultural destruction of Whites societies through the mass invasion of non-Whites.

He proudly talks of having a Chinese daughter-in-law, and how the Chinese population in Australia of around 1.5 million (Australia’s population is 25 million) is most welcome. He also parrots the obligatory propaganda of being against “racism” while seemingly being oblivious of his hypocrisy by being for the racial destruction of his own country.

In his recent book “The Big Picture” he talks honestly about how if it wasn’t for jewish support:

I may have never got into Parliament, let alone become Prime Minister.





Malcolm Turnbull

Don’t Count Trump Out


Jun 12, 2020



Click here for the video:




Published on Jun 12, 2020

58.9K subscribers
See here for accompanying article: https://unherd.com/thepost/malcolm-tu…
Click here to subscribe to UnHerd: https://unherd.com/subscribe-daily-em…

Malcolm Turnbull, Prime Minister of Australia from 2015-2018, doesn’t hold back in this wide-ranging interview with Freddie Sayers.

We cover everything from the Black Lives Matter protests to rising China and the absence of conservatism in much Right-wing thought. Singling out Donald Trump as someone who is “clearly not a conservative”, the two-time Liberal Party leader explains what he learned about the president from his time in office. Some key quotes:

0:00 Intro

0:58 On statues
• “I’m not a fan of tearing down statues… you can tear down a statue, but you can’t tear down the history”.

2:10 On Black Lives Matter
• Supports the movement but hasn’t “had the opportunity” to take the knee.

3:25 On China
• “China has changed its approach in recent years to bullying and bellicose rhetoric”.
• “Wolf warrior diplomacy is counter-productive”.
• “Trump is using China as a way to deflect from his failures with Covid”.
• Says US-China relations risk “falling into the Thucydides Trap”.
• No need for relations to “become any more intense”.

5:17 On 5G
• “I’m not saying that Huawei is spying for China, but if they’re required to, they will have to”.
• “Surprised” by the British government’s decision to grant Huawei access to key infrastructure.
• “Most people in the Five Eyes Intelligence World would say that Australia has taken a more prudent approach”.

16:48 On Dominic Cummings
• “Going to Barnard Castle to check your eyesight seems like a pretty wild thing to do”.
• “It’s important that the Prime Minister is not seen as being under the dominion of another”.

19:35 On conservatism
• Boris could “place Brexit within the tradition of practical, patriotic British conservatism”.
• But “most people who claim to be conservatives nowadays wouldn’t know the difference between Edmund Burke and Tony Burke” [Labour politician in Australia].
• “Many conservatives are the absolute antithesis of conservatives”.
• Instead there is “a lot of Right-wing, nativist populism flying around, which doesn’t respect institutions”.

21:19 On Trump
• Trump is “clearly not a conservative”.
• The most “idiosyncratic president in history”.
• Describing him as a “bully” is like saying “the Pope’s a Catholic”.
• Expected Trump to be “changed by the office”, but this was “confounded”.
• Found him “practical, pragmatic and business-like” in personal dealings.



(33:24 mins)




Freddie: Hello and welcome! You’re watching Lockdown TV from Unheard. Throughout this pandemic we have been bringing you interesting and influential thinkers to help us understand what’s really going on in this world. Today we have a very special guest. Joining us from Australia is Malcolm Turnbull. And hello Malcolm! Can you hear me?


Malcolm Turnbull: Hello Freddie! I certainly can. I can hear you and see you.


Continue reading

Posted in Australia, China, Donald Trump, Israel, Jew World Order, Malcolm Turnbull, Political Correctness, Race, Third World Immigration, Traitors - Journalists, Traitors - Politicians, Transcript, Uncategorized, Western Civilization, White genocide, Zionism | Leave a comment

Black Pilled – Unity is Our Strength – Jun 9, 2020 — Transcript


[Devon Stack, aka Black Pilled, gives a spirited call for unity among nationalists, saying diversity of views among us should be accepted, else we will fall to our enemies whose goal is our destruction.

He ends with:

We stand together, or we hang separately!





Black Pilled


Unity is Our Strength


June 9, 2020


Click here for the video:



Published on Jun 9, 2020


YouTube Description


Black Pilled
206K subscribers
Subscribe to my D-Live here: https://dlive.tv/DevonStack
My book “Day of the Rope” IS BACK, get it now while you still can!
Google Play:

You may also support BlackPilled here (they demonetize most my videos):


Bitcoin (BTC): 3MfSmMkhkxmPsLW3DaqxefVzEBBDVsa4db
Bitcoin CASH (BCH):
Age-restricted video (requested by uploader)






All right everybody, I’m recording this, because I got into a little bit of an interchange with some people on Instagram. And if you don’t follow me on Instagram it’s black underscore pilled, black_pilled. You should go check that out. But I posted something that I got a lot of push-back on that I wasn’t expecting, quite frankly. I posted this post here, and it just simply says:

“In 1629 Japanese religious authorities made suspected Christians stand on an image of Christ. If they refused, or hesitated, they were tortured and executed.

The [our] ruling class has decided that you will be multicultural! Their religious authorities are asking you to kneel.”



And what I thought was a rather clear-cut metaphor caused some people to disagree and get angry, for what I think are really kind of silly reasons that illustrate why we are so disorganized. And why we can’t seem to get anything done in the same way that the Left has been really getting things done, recently.


Continue reading

Posted in Black Pilled, Charlottesville, Liberalism, Media - jewish domination, Multiculturalism, Nationalism, Negros, Traitors - Politicians, Transcript | Leave a comment

Morgoth’s Review – Free Falling – Jun 1, 2020 — Transcript

[Morgoth gives his take on the ongoing riots, looting, and general mayhem that has spread to dozens of cities in the US sparked by the death of the black, George Floyd, while being arrested by police in Minneapolis, Minnesota on May 25.





Morgoth’s Review


Free Falling


June 1, 2020




Click here for the video:



Published on Jun 1, 2020


YouTube Description


Morgoth’s Review
29.9K subscribers
Buy me a pint here






Thanks to Theberton for the intros and outros






[Intro music and imagery by Theberton.]




Hello there folks. So I thought I would just do a stripped-down monologue on the situation in America, which seems to be getting worse every day. Washington DC is on fire. The lights of the White House, they’ve gone out. Presumably, because they’ve got snipers on the roof, because they’ve got rioters and folks outside. There’s a hundred and forty cities under siege basically, in America. And it looks like a war zone. And it looks like somewhere in Africa, not without reason, actually.


And I what I thought was interesting is the way that the system itself doesn’t seem to be able to cope with it. I mean, I didn’t expect the American government to do very much for the White population. But I at least expected the American system, the American state, to stand up for itself. But it doesn’t want to do that.

Continue reading

Posted in America, Antifa, Black Crime, Liberalism, Media - jewish domination, Morgoths Review, Multiculturalism, Negros, Race, Race Differences, Transcript, Uncategorized | Leave a comment