[Millennial Woes delivers a good speech at the Scandza Forum held in Copenhagen on Oct 12, 2019. His topic was on the delusion of egalitarianism that our corrupt “elites” promote and the necessity for them to lie to the public about their real agenda.

He is optimistic that we can succeed in turning the public to our ideas despite the generations of brainwashing that they have suffered with. He says:

“But! We do enjoy an advantage which our opponents 70 years ago lacked. They were working against the public, at every level, and against human nature! We are not! Indeed, this is why they had to be sneaky and subversive. Had they proffered their ideas openly in 1946, the public would have rejected every single one of them.“

— KATANA.]

_______________________

Scandza Forum

Copenhagen 2019

Millennial Woes

Click the link below to view the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46amg4OanUM

YouTube Description

Millennial Woes’ speech “Regenerate Against the Machine”, at the Scandza Forum in Copenhagen in October 2019

Published on Oct 16, 2019

18:28

Category
News & Politics
220 Comments

__________________________

TRANSCRIPT

(18:28)

[00:01]

Woes: All right! Hello everyone. Okay, so first of all thank you to Frodi for organizing this conference and inviting me to speak. I would also like to thank a Sikh friend of mine. I have very few of those as you might imagine, so y’all know who he is, for giving me some ideas for this speech. Now, in 2004 the public intellectual Paul Graham wrote the following:

“Changes between the past and the present, sometimes do represent progress. In a field like physics if we disagree with past generations, it’s because we are right and they are wrong! But this becomes rapidly less true as you move away from the certainty of the hard sciences. By the time you get to social questions, many changes are just fashion.”

And we see this with that, I mean, I don’t think I even need to illustrate this, that clearly a lot of attitudes are that we have today, that are popular today are not based on rationality, or logic, or whatever. It’s simply a change as a people — it is just fashion, trends, fads! People have been persuaded that X is better than Y, but there’s no actual reason for it, or indeed it might be a trick. It might be were there being actively deceived into advocating something that’s bad for them.

And it is interesting sometimes when you see this open contradiction where something that, like, for example, the border wall with Trump. Apparently that’s the worst thing the worst idea the most evil idea in the world! But Democratic politicians were advocating the very same thing ten years ago. I believe Hillary Clinton actually advocated it, and, or Obama, but I’m not sure about that. And in gay marriage, at the start of his presidency Barack Obama opposed gay marriage. But then within a few years it was suddenly an absolute essential that, of course, we have to have gay marriage. Amazing!

However Paul Graham says that this does not happen in the hard sciences, such as physics. But actually that’s not true, because even the hard sciences are affected by fashion. And the other day I was listening to an interview with Douglas Murray and he was talking about the transgender issue. And he said that:

“For the first time science is being invited to lie, because saying that gender is performative, women are not naturally feminine, and so on.”

But actually and, he’s saying that for the first time scientists are being invited to lie, to bolster a social trend. But honestly that’s not true. This is not the first time. For at least 50 years science has been invited to lie about the question of race, the existence of race. And that’s had interesting consequences all over the place. So, also now, possibly climate change. I don’t know what any of you believe about climate change, but it does seem like something that’s been co-opted by progressive forces. And now if you dare to question it, you’re risking a lot. So it’s no longer a question of logic and rationality. It’s no you are expected to believe this thing, regardless of what objections you might have to it. So yes, even the hard sciences are subject to this. So Paul Graham continues:

 

“Swear words are part of the English language.”

Of course, they are part of every language, but he’s speaking about English:

“So therefore, because swear words are part of the English language, parents are giving their kids an inaccurate idea of the language by not using swear words. Why did parents do this? Because they don’t think it’s fitting that kids should use the whole language. We like children to seem innocent. Most adults, likewise deliberately give kids a misleading view of the world. One of the most obvious examples is Santa Claus. We think it’s cute for little kids to believe in Santa Claus, but one wonders do we tell them, this stuff further for their sake, or for ours?”

That’s Paul Graham. And I thought that was a very [05:00] interesting question.

And I think perhaps it’s the key to understanding why today’s elite are corrupt. I suspect, that a good elite lies to the public. I think every elite inevitably lies to the public. I think it’s just as something that happens. But I think that a good elite lies to the public for the public’s sake. To give them hope, to allow them to simplify things, to allow them to have faith in their society, to enable them to keep going. And I think that a bad elite, lies to the public not for the public’s sake, but for it’s own sake! And the Western elites today, political, academic, media, they lie to the public constantly! Even systematically! And it’s not to benefit the public. Indeed, the lives positively harm the public in the short term, but even more so in the long term.

So, national populism, is a slightly contradictory thing. It is ostensibly the voice of the people, but it is channeled through particular individuals, leaders and intellectuals. A given here is the belief that people need to be led, and that people want to be led. I think the evidence of antifa outside, might back that up. The request that rings out from the public is “Lead us!”. But really this is what the public always asks for. It’s just that most of the time they do it subtly.

People are social creatures wanting to know what the situation is and how to navigate it. And they are hierarchical creatures as well, requiring that the situation and how to navigate it be defined for them by individuals whom they look up to. Very few people want to work everything out for themselves. It’s a difficult thing to do and most people frankly don’t seem to trust their own judgment that much. This is demonstrable. It’s why they seek culture to be guided by. Exemplars to emulate and leaders to follow.

National populism is a call for us to be much more honest about this perennial truth, this situation. The people want leaders who know what their role is, and to take it seriously. The people want leaders who look after them sincerely, who don’t just pertained to. The people want leaders whom they can trust, because the leaders they currently have, they can’t trust! And this applies to political leaders as well as cultural leaders. The commentators and the intellectuals who shaped society.

There is a need for this shake-up, because the leaders we have, and have had for many decades now have fallen into a combination of delusion and dishonesty! G K Chesterton once wrote:

 

“I can trust the uneducated, but not the badly educated. And today’s elites are very badly educated!”

Believe it, or not, you can be educated away from honesty, away from sincerity, away from common sense, and away from your kith and kin. In fact, these are all prerequisites for being in today’s elites. Meantime, the common people are as they always were, in need of a shepherd to protect them from danger, but also they are able to sense danger sooner than the Shepherd can. The people should listen to their Shepherd, but also the Shepherd should listen to his people and respect their instincts.

Today’s elites despise the instincts of ordinary people! When people today complain of problems their elites answer them with contempt, complacency, and dishonesty! They either deny that the problems exist at all, or they come up with false analyses and dreadful solutions! For example, the elites solution to the problems of diversity, is more diversity! The elites solution to the problems created by feminism, is more feminism! The elite solution to the warping of masculinity into toxic masculinity, is to keep demonizing masculinity! The elite solution to the public’s revulsion at unisex bathrooms, is more unisex bathrooms! Constantly, the elite solution is to keep doing whatever created the problem that now needs to be solved!

The elite do this, because they are sticking to the program that they have been beholden to for decades. [10:01] The truth is, the elite created all of these problems in the first place! Their central sin was to fall into the delusion of egalitarianism. They insisted that everything and everyone is equal, thus nullifying their own station as an elite! They did this while contradictorily pouring scorn on the White working-class. This exposed their lie, that everyone is equal, but it also absolved them of all moral responsibility. They can then say:

“We are not really an elite! Everyone is equal! We are just managers, janitors. We just keep the infrastructure and the economy going! When it comes to morals, ethics, culture, metaphysics, you little people are on your own. You have to decide what is right and wrong! You have to decide how to live! You have to decide what to believe in! And most of all you have to believe in yourself, because everyone is equal!”

This middle class, nouveau riche, nihilistic drivel, it’s what led to the Rotherham scandal in Britain. All morals have been negated! All metaphysics vaporized! All social institutions gutted of authority, prestige, respect, and the ability to function!

And it is this model chaos which leads to the desire for national populism. In short, the people are demanding a new elite, because the old elite are severely dysfunctional! Because they are severely dishonest, because they are severely delusional! They preach equality from a patronizing elitist perspective, while jealously guarding their own status as an elite, and openly despising those who are not in the elite. Calling them low information voters, and uneducated Brexit gammon, etc.

Meantime, the common people though flattered by the lie that everyone is equal, understand instinctually that this is not true, and cannot be true. And they don’t want it to be true either, because they want the comfort of an elite that is looking after them. And then there are people like us, in the dissident right, who advocate a return to elitist values, but on an honest footing. We believe the elite should accept that it is an elite, and that it should be an elite, and that it deserves to be an elite. And that the role of an elite is essential for society to function.

But furthermore, we advocate hierarchy while trying to escape the egalitarian orthodoxy, by demanding an egalitarian approach to freedom of speech, so that we can advocate hierarchy! It’s rather ironic. And so we arrive at the rather surreal situation that we have today. An elitist aristocratic paradigm is being proposed from below using a egalitarianism as it’s vehicle. Meantime an egalitarian paradigm is being imposed from above, using democracy as it’s vehicle, but also using anti-democracy as it’s vehicle. For example, opposition to the Brexit referendum and support for the distant EU Parliament, over local politics. But the egalitarianism is also proposed by using elitism as a vehicle, with ideas like:

“Only stupid people don’t believe in equality! Only stupid people believe that there are any stupid people!”

It’s insane, obviously.

So, it is often said that to combat the progressive elite we need to do our own “long march through the institutions”. There are at least three problems with that.

One they, are hyper aware of us and the threat that we pose. By contrast, the Conservatives whom they usurped seventy years ago, were not worried about them at all. And that’s why those conservatives lost everything.

Two! There isn’t time for another long march through the institutions. They had 70 years. We have maybe 20 years to rescue the West, or least to get onto a good footing again.

And then three. The people that we would be usurping in academia, media, etc., are backed up by not only global corporations, but the governments of virtually every country in the West. Those governments are also very worried [15:02] about us, and are implementing laws to criminalize our ideas. Therefore it is wildly naive to think that we can inject a virus into the system, and the system will calmly allow that virus to take it over. The system is hysterical about us! We are not going to be allowed to be sneaky and subversive! But even if that did happen, as I said, there isn’t time for the virus to do its work. We don’t have 70 years.

But! We do enjoy an advantage which our opponents 70 years ago lacked. They were working against the public, at every level, and against human nature! We are not! Indeed, this is why they had to be sneaky and subversive. Had they proffered their ideas openly in 1946, the public would have rejected every single one of them.

No! We don’t want mass emigration!

No! We don’t want multiculturalism!

No! We don’t want our granddaughters raped by Islamists!

No! We don’t believe that race is a social construct!

No! We don’t believe that male and female are social constructs!

No! We don’t want drag queens teaching our children how to twerk!

No! We don’t believe that everything is relative!

No! We don’t believe that Europe is meaningless, or that we have no special rights to our countries!

No! We don’t believe that Europeans are the cancer of human history!

All of these ideas would have been flatly rejected by the public in 1946. But guess what? They would be flatly rejected by the public in 2019! Even now the progressive elite have to hide their true beliefs from the public. We don’t!

We can be very honest with the public, because we are not opposed to the public. We do not despise the public. We are not trying to betray, trick, replace, or destroy, the public.

We advocates of a new elitism are, though idealistic, grounded in realism. We accept the public as they are.

We accept the old elite as they are. The purveyors of lies, which are creating a perverse and chaotic situation that will culminate with the complete destruction of everything that we hold dear! We accept that egalitarianism is the nullification of everything, and the endangerment of everyone.

And we accept that something desperately needs to change!

Thank you.

[Applause]

[18:01]

END

============================================

See Also:

Millennial Woes with Morgoth on Brexit — Jul 2, 2016 — TRANSCRIPT

A Woes By Any Other Name — TRANSCRIPT

Millennial Woes – To Be a Man in 2017 – Speech at Erkenbrand dinner — TRANSCRIPT

Millennial Woes – One Hour from Now – Speech to Erkenbrand — TRANSCRIPT

Millennial Woes’ Millenniyule 2017 No. 66 – Morgoth — TRANSCRIPT

Millennial Woes – The Passion of Jordan Peterson – Speech to Blue Awakening — TRANSCRIPT

Millennial Woes at the Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2019 – Daughter of Albion – Dec 28, 2019 — Transcript

Millennial Woes – The Strife of Tongues – Nov 30, 2020 — Transcript

============================================

PDF Notes

Version 1 —

• Total words = xxx
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages =

(Available later)

Version History

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2: Dec 4, 2020 — Added See Also image and links.

Version 1: Oct 22, 2019 — Published post.

[Mark Collett delivers a great speech at the Scandza Forum held in Copenhagen on Oct 12, 2019. His topic was the fraudulent nature of our our so-called democracies where the “popular vote” is only only acceptable if it fulfills the agenda of our hostile “elites“, the internationalist cliques, and their puppet prostitute politicians.

The true will of ordinary people is rejected as something bad and is labelled as “populism” by our rulers, since it is opposed to their real agenda of racially and culturally destroying us Whites.

Mark ends on a defiant note with; “… the will of the European people, will soon be heard by all of these parasites and traitors! Our people will come together! They will rise up as one! Not to ask for the scraps from the table! Not to beg for mercy! But to take back our destiny!“

— KATANA.]

_______________________

Scandza Forum

Copenhagen 2019

Mark Collett

Click the link below to view the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsMctb3E_HQ

YouTube Description

Published on Oct 17, 2019

28:28

Category
News & Politics
172 Comments

__________________________

TRANSCRIPT

(28:28)

[00:01]

Mark Collett: Well hello everyone. I’d firstly like to say how nice it is to be here at another Scandza forum, despite what’s going on outside. And I’d like to thank the wonderful Frodi Midjord for inviting me along today, because it’s so great to come out here and meet all you wonderful people.

Now, I just want to say a few words about Frodi before I begin. Because after arranging a similar event in England, I’ve got to say, it is far more stressful arranging an event like this than you could possibly imagine! It really does push you to your limits. And Frodi always looks so cool, he looks so calm, he looks so collected, despite the circus going on outside, people not being able to get in, all the stressful other things that happen. And when I say stressful “other things”, if any of you have arranged even a smaller event, the stressful “other things” also push you over the edge.

But I think it’s a sign of a true leader, when, under such heavy fire, under such circumstances that would cause normal men to break, he just looks so calm and carries this off so perfectly! So, it really is an honor to know him.

And I’d also like to thank him today, because he said to me before I came, he said:

“Mark, I only want you to speak for 20 minutes.”

And I thought:

“That’s really great! Because I get to fly all the way to Denmark, somewhere I’ve never been, meet all these wonderful people, have dinner with everyone, and I only get to do, or have to do, half the work that I’m usually expected to do!”

And when he asked me to speak about the issue of “populism”, it was something that I could have said an awful lot more about. And it’s something I was very, very, eager to speak about. Because in the last few years the media have been talking about “populism” constantly! About this malevolent specter of “populism” that is rising up! And, it’s casting a shadow across the Western world, across all European nations! And all nations, in fact, which would have been referred to as Western nations, America and Australia too.

And the media have been very, very, very quick to decry populism as this great threat to democracy. As a threat to liberal values, as a threat to freedom of speech, and as a threat to almost Western civilization itself!

So I thought to myself:

“What actually is populism? What does populism mean? What is this threat, that threatens us all, that threatens this wonderful democracy we live in?”

Well, I defaulted to something that isn’t really our friend, to Google, and I asked:

“What is populism?”

And the answer that was spat back at me was:

“A political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups.”

And that made me think:

“Wow! That sounds pretty good, doesn’t it?”

I mean, when you read that, you would think populism would be a good thing! And that the “populist”, the people leading this populist revolution, the people who are actually standing up for ordinary folk, that they would be the heroes. That they would be the good guys! But no! According to the press, according to the media, according to the establishment, we’re, in fact, or the “populist” should I say:

 

“Are the greatest evil of our time!”

The populists, are in fact, the bad guys! They’re the ones who are threatening everything we hold dear.

[05:01]

Now that’s all a little bit strange, because we’re repeatedly told that we live in a “democracy”. And that’s the key word, because a democracy is a system where the ordinary people are meant to have representation in Parliament. And the key word there, the word that should be underlined in that sentence, is “representation”. Now, democracy is not meant to be a system where you elect someone to tell you what to do. You don’t go to the polling booth to elect someone to tell you how to think, to tell you how to feel. You’re not going to the polling station to elect someone who is meant to impose their will upon you. You’re going there, you’re going to the polling station, you’re marking your little cross in the box, and you’re popping it in the box, because you’re meant to be voting for someone to represent you in Parliament!

And that makes sense, because Parliament is a huge building. It’s a really large building. But it’s not that big. It’s not big enough to hold us all. It’s not big enough, so that we can we’ll just jump into our car travel down to Parliament and have our say when something is happening. Because if we did that, there’d be utter chaos! And there’s far more people in Britain who want to have a say in how the nation is run, than could ever fit into a single building.

So they’ve broken Britain down into constituencies. And in those constituencies the people, the constituents, elect someone to represent their views in Parliament. So each individual constituency sends one person to represent the ordinary people, so that the ordinary people get to have their voices heard. And that really makes sense, because it saves everyone in that constituency having to gang together, get in buses, get in their cars, you know, go down to London to have a say. It all makes perfect sense when you think about it.

But then you look at it and think, well “parliamentary democracy” — this system of electing one person to represent the ordinary people — by its very nature it seems to be exactly the same as the system of populism that the media hates! You know, ordinary people are voting for candidates and the winner of the popular vote, they get elected, they go to Parliament, and then they put forward the opinions of the ordinary people. That does sound like a good system.

But then you think isn’t it rather odd that the press, the media, the establishment, they’re all decrying populism! They’re all attacking the idea of ordinary people being represented in Parliament. They’re attacking the idea that ordinary people should have their voices heard. But at the same time as attacking populism, they’re all saying “democracy is sacred”! Democracy is central to our way of life! They tell us the importance of this wonderful democracy, and how our societies stand above all other societies in the world, because of that parliamentary democracy.

And you’re thinking to yourself:

 

“None of this adds up. You’ve got democracy on one hand. You’ve got populism on the other. And the media is saying ‘populism’ is bad, yet ‘democracy’ is good, and that they, in fact, opposites!”

But it goes further than that. They’re not just opposites, the politicians, the press, the media, they say populism is actually a threat to democracy! One threatens the existence of the other! And that populism, because he threatens this wonderful democracy, it needs to be curtailed! It needs to be stopped! We need to stop these evil populists from representing the ordinary people, because otherwise our freedom, our liberty, our entire way of life, will disappear as we know it!

And, at this point, I’m sure everyone in the room has got the message. It’s all getting quite clear, that the media attack populism — yet they praise democracy — because democracy in its current form, and populism — two things that should be the same — are, in fact, very different forms of governance. One represents the people, the other ignores the people!

[10:01]

And democracy — the system which is meant to be a system of representation of ordinary people — is now no longer anything to do with representing ordinary people!

So I thought, we should probably dig a little deeper into the terms that liberals use, the terms that are used by the establishment, the media, and the press, and we should look at those terms and we should translate them. We should provide a translation service from “liberal speak” into English!

So we’re going to look at three words, or three terms: “democracy”, the “popular vote”, and “populism”. And we’ll start with the term “democracy”..

Now we all know what democracy should be. We know what it should mean. We know it should be about representation. But what does it mean when that word is being spoken by a liberal? When you hear a liberal say “democracy”, let’s translate that “liberal-speak” into English. Because, when a liberal says democracy, you’re not talking about representation. You’re talking about a system of voting for an out-of-touch “gun-for-hire”. And that’s a very nice way of putting it, because when you say “gun-for-hire”, you think of some kind of Western hero in the Wild West doing something heroic.

So let’s not call them “guns-for-hire”, let’s call them “prostitutes”. [laughter] You vote for a prostitute, and crucially, you don’t vote for the prostitute that you like the best! [laughter] You vote for the prostitute you dislike the least! And that’s a very important point. That’s a crucial part of this process! Because few people still vote for a candidate that they really like. Instead they look at all the candidates and say:

“I really don’t like him, and I don’t like him either, but I really hate him! So I’m gonna vote for him, who I dislike, because it’s better than him over there, who I really hate!”

And that’s what happens in England. You know, you hear people saying all the time:

“Oh the Tories and Labour, I can’t stand any of them! So who did you vote for? Oh I voted Tory. Why? Because I really hate Labour!”

And then, on the other hand:

“Ahh, I’m not a fan of any of those people in Parliament. Well did you vote? Yeah, I voted Labour, because me dad said ‘Never vote Tories, because they’ll be far worse than Labour’.”

And you’re stuck in this system of voting for people that you don’t really want to vote for!

So, you start by voting for the candidate, or prostitute, that you dislike the least. And then that prostitute goes to Parliament on your behalf. But they don’t represent you. But instead they prostitute themselves to big business, to special interest groups, to internationalist causes. And when in Parliament that prostitute sits there, and basically implements whatever they want, what benefits them personally, what benefits their paymasters! And they do all of this regardless of what their constituents want. In fact, once elected most of these prostitutes, actually do the very opposite of what the people who voted for them — the people who voted for that prostitute to represent them — they do the opposite of what those people want!

So in short, what do liberals really mean when they say “democracy”? Well, this is the translation; democracy — in liberal-speak — is a system of electing the prostitute that you dislike the least, so he, or she, can then represent the interests of someone else, often to your detriment!

Now we’ll move to definition two, the “popular vote”. Now everyone knows what the popular vote is meant to mean. It’s meant to mean the total number of votes cast. It’s meant to mean all the people who go to the polling station to put their little mark, little cross, in the box, and pop their little a piece of paper in the ballot box.

Now again, this is very strange, because the vast, vast, majority of people who go to the polling station to put their little piece of paper in the box, who are those people? Well you’ve probably guessed it. They are actually ordinary people. The vast majority of people who vote, are ordinary people. But this isn’t “populist”, this is the “popular vote”.

So what’s the difference between ordinary people voting for something, and that being populism, and the popular vote? Well in the liberal system of democracy, the people are, of course, not voting for what they actually want, they [15:01] are presented with a narrow selection of candidates, narrow selection of options, which are all pre-approved and pre-chosen by the establishment.

So you can clearly see that it’s only “populism” when people get to vote for someone who they actually like! Who they actually want to vote for, who actually stands up for the ordinary people. In liberal-speak the vote is only popular and democratic when the person elected doesn’t represent the people who elected them! You see “popular” is always seen as good. When the press talk about popular it’s always good. But it’s only good, it’s only right, it’s only the correct thing, when “popular” chooses the right candidate, when it chooses the candidate that the establishment, the internationalists, and the media want.

So, when a voter elects a candidate who wants open borders, who wants to flood us with low IQ migrants, who wants to put GDP on a pedestal, who wants us all being attacked in the street by people who shouldn’t belong here, well, when somebody votes them in, that’s “popular”! Democracy’s triumphed! We all give ourselves a pat on the back! We cheer! What a wonderful system we live in! And the media and the press, they all congratulate themselves, they congratulate the system. And we are told by these people that we should all honor that result. And whatever the prostitute who’s been elected wants to do, we should adhere to that with slavish devotion! Because the popular vote has triumphed, and that is the will of the people.

So if the current ruling prostitutes let’s in those millions of low IQ migrants who create chaos, we have to sit there clapping like seals! We have to applaud it! We have to say it was the right thing, because the prostitute who is doing this, or the group of prostitutes, they won the popular vote!

So those low IQ migrants flooding our towns and cities, well, that’s what we wanted, isn’t it? That’s the will of the people! But, if one of these populists, one of these awful threats to democracy, ends up on the ballot paper and the people do the unthinkable and elect them into Parliament, or a regional body, and they elect somebody that really represents them.

If the ordinary people elect someone who actually represents them! Democracy has failed! Democracy has failed us all and the vote must be recast, or the candidate must be impeached, or we must have a second run at the referendum! And we’ll keep having a second run, in fact, we’ll have a third run, we’ll have a do-over, and we’ll do it again, and again, and again, until the establishment, and the media, and the press, get the result they want!

Because, the result is only “smiled upon” when the people make the “right choice”, when they elect the “right candidate”. When people elect the “right candidate”, it’s “popular”! When people elect the “wrong candidate” it’s “populism”! Do you see what they’re doing there? “Popular” is good, “populism” is evil.

And that takes us on to the third and final definition. Which is, of course, “populism”. Populism is the final piece of this puzzle it’s the final part of this interesting use of language. In reality, populism; the will of the people. It’s what ordinary people want. And it means true representation of people at grassroots level. It means talking about issues that ordinary people care about. It means saying:

“We don’t want loads of low IQ foreigners flooding our lands, and taking our jobs, and raping young girls in Rotherham, in Telford.”

It means talking about these grooming gangs and saying:

“Why aren’t the police doing something about it?”

It means saying:

“The EU hasn’t been a good thing for our people.”

It means talking about all the issues that we speak about! And the issues we speak about, are the same issues that normal people, in their homes, on a daily basis, talk about when they know they’re not being listened to by people who might report them to bodies and groups that want to shut up the ordinary people! And ultimately it means electing candidates who are free. [20:00] Who do not serve special interest groups. Who do not serve minorities. Who do not serve shady (((financiers))), or media hacks. It means electing people who are free of the strings that are attached to the claws of the (((internationalist clique))) !

You see, once the riddle of democracy, the popular vote, and populism, is all translated, once the “liberal-speak” is put into plain English, it becomes very, very, clear as to why the media and the press and the establishment hate populism so much, and why they’re so viciously opposed to it. They hate populism, because populism is actually true democracy. It’s the will of the people! And ultimately the media, the establishment, and the internationalists, do not want the will of the people to be expressed! Because the will of the people is a threat to their power!

And from the very beginning of this speech, I’ve kept using one phrase, and that’s “ordinary people”. And a theme has emerged throughout this short speech, a theme of the media and of the establishment wishing to take away the voice of the ordinary people! And ensuring that ordinary people don’t have a say. That the wishes of ordinary people are not represented!

And why is that? Well, quite simply, those who run the media, the internationalist clique pulling the strings of the prostitute politicians, they are not ordinary people! In fact, they hate the ordinary people! And they do not want the ordinary people to take their destiny into their own hands. Because what is good for the ordinary people, is not good for those who run the media, for those within the establishment, for the internationalists! And the opposite is true. What is good for the internationalists, what is good for those in the media, what is good for those in the establishment, is not good for ordinary people!

But, I still haven’t got to the bottom of this. I keep saying “ordinary people”, but who are the “ordinary people”? Who are the people having their will suppressed, the ones the internationalists want to control and deny a voice? Who are the people being disenfranchised, the people being turned into second-class citizens? Well, those people are the indigenous people of Europe! They are the people of European descent. They are us!

And the establishment, the media, the internationalists, they want to deny us a voice, because they hate us! They hate those of European descent! And what’s more, they want us gone! They want us bred out of existence and replaced in our own ancestral homelands! Thus, the internationalists have fashioned a system to do away with us. And they call it “democracy”! And they tell us we have a choice. But every time we choose something they don’t like, every time we vote outside of their narrow list of options, they go beserk and they decry our choice as “populism”! Because their system of democracy doesn’t present real choice. Because it was never intended to present real choice!

The so called “liberal democracy” presents the illusion of choice! Because the key to all this, is when you believe you are free, when you have the illusion of choice, you are much less likely to rebel! You’re less likely to try to break free from the cage that has been built around you! And wouldn’t that be the greatest kind of bondage, the greatest kind of cage? A prison where the inmates believed that they were, in fact, free and had a choice! And that’s the truth of the matter. The democracy that is promoted by the media and the establishment is just another tool of control! Just another way of ensuring that those of European descent will never be free!

[25:00]

But amongst all the liberal doublespeak, amongst all the babble, there is one truth. Our enemies do speak one truth. And that is that populism threatens their illusion of democracy! Populism threatens to wipe away their corrupt system, and do away with the political prostitutes that rule over us! Populism threatens to set our people free! Because populism is the will of the people, not the will of the internationalist clique!

And that begs a question. What is the will of the people? What is the will of our people? What do those of European descent want? What do we want so much that the internationalists fear and hate so much? Well, we want the one thing that they will never accept! We want to exist! We want to prosper! We want to celebrate our culture, our traditions, and our heritage! We want a future in our ancestral homelands, and we want a future for our children!

And the reason the internationalists, and their puppet politicians, are making so much noise about populism, is because they are scared! They’re scared that our people have started to stir! That our people are starting to speak up! And maybe, you can hear it. It may have started as a whisper, as a murmur, amongst the crowds, but the voice of the European people is getting louder! And more, and more, of us are daring to stand up! More and more of us are ready to be heard! Ready to stand up against the establishment, and dare to speak the words that are becoming the act of defiance of our age!

And the popular will of our people, the act of defiance, the will of the European people, will soon be heard by all of these parasites and traitors! Our people will come together! They will rise up as one!

Not to ask for the scraps from the table! Not to beg for mercy! But to take back our destiny! And to state clearly and unequivocally that we will not be replaced!

Thank you.

[loud applause and cheering]

[28:07]

END

============================================

See Also:

============================================

PDF Notes

Version 1 —

* Total words = xxx
* Total images = xx
* Total A4 pages =

(Available later)

Version History

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Oct 19, 2019 — Published post.