============================================

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/27/2024 = 40)

Euroicus
4 days ago
It is now undeniable, Britain is under occupation and this time it didn’t even require a military invasion. At least the Romans, Viking and Normans lost a lot of good men fighting to take over this country. This time the invaders were simply handed Britain on a plate.

46
0
Hide replies
All Govs are Zionist Occupied
4 days ago(edited)
That’s the force multiplying power of jewish central banks and fractional reserve banking. Unlimited leverage for societal manipulation, propagandization and demoralization.

33
0
Hide replies
All Govs are Zionist Occupied
4 days ago

Claudia Sheinbaum is on track to become Mexico’s first Jewish and woman president

1
0
Blankeon
4 days ago
Our current occupation is not comparable to the Roman, Viking or Norman occupations. The Romans, Vikings and Norman were European people almost entirely similar to the indigenous British. Being ruled by our racial enemies from the other side of the world is a trillion times worse.

28
1
Hide replies
GusinLanzarote Alt Right
4 days ago
at least we didnt end up speaking Germán

2
0
Euroicus
3 days ago
Yes, absolutely. This is genetic warfare. This is a biological holocaust against Europeans on a global scale. There have been many occupations in history but this is the first global genocide deliberately designed to exterminate and replace an entire race worldwide. The British Empire ruled India for nearly 200 years but today India is still full of Indians while the British are being replace by Indians, Pakistanis and blacks in our own ancestral homeland. The Kalergi Plan is our Holocaust.

5
0
Hide replies
Blankeon
3 days ago
True, except I do not believe the Holocaust was real. If it was, there would not have been any survivors.

2
0
Hide replies
Euroicus
3 days ago
Neither do I, I was using the term “holocaust” in a general sense as in “nuclear holocaust” or “zombie holocaust”… The jews have no right to monopolise this word. In fact if I ever hear a normie say “THE holocaust” I always respond by asking which holocaust?

4
0

@cybertec69
4 days ago
By the Jew.

23
0
GusinLanzarote Alt Right
4 days ago

3
0
All Govs are Zionist Occupied
4 days ago(edited)
*Britain is Ruled by JEWS…who install brown puppet figure heads.
This is the same for all White nations.

34
0
MTaylor
4 days ago
Tools for the Js

22
0
Redpill Rundown
4 days ago
complete and utter insanity

12
0

@Articulus
4 days ago
The title is incorrect it should read “Britain is Overruled by Foreigners”
Britain has had it’s say repeatedly and every single decision the collective has made has been overruled by foreigners.

10
0
Hide replies

@cybertec69
4 days ago
It’s the Jew who is behind it ALL.

19
0
Dissident Doctrine
4 days ago
I thought colonialism was bad and that in ‘insert current year’ it should have been consigned to the history books. Yet, here we are in ‘insert current year’ with coloniser insurgents running our countries… It’s only bad when white people do it. Das raysis.

8
0
GusinLanzarote Alt Right
4 days ago
If only Britain had been ruled by a General Franco from 1939-75 the 3rd World immigrants would be less in number & less established in the society think there is one Black in the Spanish parliament. Remember in the 80s 90s clueless Boomers telling us about vulnerable unheard minorities – “why are you so obsessed with 5%of the population?”Now they RUN Britain & they havent forgotten their race like Normie/ Libtard whites

9
1
Not So Great Reset
4 days ago
The Welsh too??

6
0

@phaethon
4 days ago
from the Gandhi movie
Brigadier : You don’t think we’re just going to walk out of India!
Gandhi : Yes. In the end, you will walk out.
in 2024
Rishi Sunak: You don’t think we’re just going to walk out of Britain!
Mark Collett: Yes. In the end, you will walk out.

4
0

@mamoralesnyc
4 days ago
Very sad to see what’s happened to Britain. The Brits are far too kind, particularly the Scots nicest, humble people.

4
0

@ИванКожедуб
3 days ago
You missed out Northern Ireland.

2
0
Hide replies
Mark Collett
3 days ago
Northern Ireland is in the United Kingdom, Great Britain is England, Scotland and Wales.

1
1
Stephen Spry
3 days ago
It’s not figurative at all to say this is a war. Mass immigration is invasion and occupation, and political installation is the attempted coup de grace.
Brought to you by international jewish mafia, who operate in each country through its corrupt element, tying them together in an international criminal order.

2
0

@popovacianen
4 days ago
ffs ;(

2
0
Mr
10 hours ago
Shakespeare himself couldn’t have written a more somber tragedy.

1
0
Krimsun
1 day ago
By anti-humans*

1
0

@FriedrichC
2 days ago
Jews and white race traitors are helping islam to conquer Britain.

1
0

@Phineas_T_Ramsbottom
3 days ago
Brown, brown, brown and brown. Super diverse

1
0

@ScotChann
4 days ago
Its not diverse, it’s a mess. But if you import the third world, expect the third world

1
0
Hooter McGavin
4 days ago
Being ruled over by foreigners is specifically addressed in the Bible. Its a self inflicted curse upon nations for being ungrateful cunts.

3
5
Hide replies

@Anathema2me
4 days ago
Browns publicly ruling is happening directly as a consequence jews covertly ruling the entire West.

1
0
Land of Ghosts
4 days ago
Relax, go to the movies, prepare a review.

0
14
Hide replies
GusinLanzarote Alt Right
4 days ago
the land of Normie oblivion does seem tempting at times – but soon there will be No sand left for the ostriches head

8
0
Hide replies
Land of Ghosts
4 days ago
I was being sarcastic. He goes to the movies too much. Of course, none of us care to identify the enemy and try to eliminate him, except for the psycho ones.

0
3

@HariUK
4 hours ago
The British far left took full advantage of the weakness of polite white society. It could only happen because the indigenous majority thought that “diversity” was ever a good thing. It wasn’t and now all of Britain’s captured media and political entities either normalise or legitimise balkanisation in order to destroy our once-great nation.

Instinct
3 days ago
I would oppose shitskins ruling Britain but I don’t want to be arrested.

@SPWKarlsson
4 days ago(edited)
[ DO JEWS FEAR BRITAIN GOING WHITE?! – TalkTV’s Grike Maham Shocking Reaction to ‘Londonistan Becoming Most Antisemitic City in the WEST!’ ]

Hide replies

@Zardoz
4 days ago
I would think the opposite, if jews feared the native Whites, they would think twice about placing these clowns in office, I would think that the problem is they don’t fear the native Whites which only encourages them to pull shit like this.

5
0
Hide replies
Land of Ghosts
4 days ago
Correct. All we do is whimper and cry. They aren’t afraid of us.

2
0

==========================

See Also

top

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett at The Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — Transcript

Patriotic Weekly Review – with Blair Cottrell – Dec 4, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Dangerfield – Talking Tough with Mark Collett – Mar 28, 2020 — Transcript

Mark Collett – Sam Melia Sentencing – with Laura Towler – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

Joe Marsh – Sam Melia Going into Court Before He was Sentenced – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

============================================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 800

• Total words in post = 2,367
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2: Tue, Apr 9, 2024 — Added images.

Version 1: Sun, Apr 7, 2024 — Published post. Includes Odysee comments (40).

Lana Lokteff: The Scottish government didn’t like my video exposing the new Pakistani First Minister of Scotland, where I exposed his blatant double standards and hatred of Scottish White people. He’s only in that position because of 71 Lefties in Parliament that voted for him.

This week, I was on the front page of the Scotsman! “Police Scotland launches investigation into racist abuse and threats aimed at Humza Yusaf”. And my video was at the centre of it. The Scottish police are investigating my content, trying to get it removed from BitChute, which is based in the UK, just one of the many places it’s available after receiving a complaint from Yusaf’s office! Yes, from his office! His office is upset about my two videos calling out his racial hatred of Whites and double standards, one that was viewed a million times on Twitter.

So then they got the Tech Against Terrorism, a UN organize involved to try and get my video blocked. Terrorism! They’re accusing me of terrorism for valid criticism of a man in the highest office of politics!

As First Minister, he was inciting hatred against Scottish people, White people, the majority of the country. He’s disgusted that in a European Scottish country that they make up the majority. He is a public authority in a government building, charging and targeting one race, inciting hate against them. This is the type of behaviour that leads to violence and genocide! The Scottish police should be investigating him for racial hate crimes, not investigating my videos or BitChute.

My truth telling video exposing Humza Yusaf’s own words is “terrorism”, according to him. He is in the highest office of government and yet he’s crying abuse and racism when people respond to and criticise his own words and actions. He wants people like me silenced and imprisoned. He’s the one pushing the tyrannical anti-free speech Hate Crime Bill in Scotland. He has made everything about race and his religion. And when you respond to it, you are the terrorist! He gave some sob story in Parliament about being a young kid and people seeing him differently. Check it out.

Humza Yousaf: I just wanted to share a personal anecdote to hopefully illustrate why I think the Hate Crime Bill is needed, not because my experience actually is unique. Actually, it’s the very opposite! They are the experiences of hundreds of thousands of our fellow Scots. As a young child, I wasn’t aware that the colour of my skin made me different to the majority of most Scots. That may seem unusual, but anybody who has, I think, young kids or young nephews or nieces, grandchildren, they’ll understand that innocence.

The first time I ever became aware of my race was in primary school. In primary two, in fact. It was my best friend. He’d be my best friend in primary one. He came up to me one day completely out of the blue. We hadn’t had a fight, we hadn’t had a disagreement of any sort. And he said in a very matter of fact voice:

“I can’t be your friend anymore!”

And I remember feeling quite stunned, as I say. It came completely out of the blue.

And of course, I asked him why, and he said to me, and I always remember it, he said:

“Because you’re a Paki.”

I had no idea what the word meant. I remember skulking around the playground, not really having a clue of what just happened.

And I went back home after school and I asked my mom:

“Am I a Paki?”

I remember my mom being quite visibly upset, and she explained to me how some people, very rude people, she said, sometimes make fun of us because of the colour of our skin. But I had done nothing wrong.

And from six years old to the very present day, some 30 years, not a day goes by presiding officer that I’m not conscious of the colour of my skin!

[03:47]

Lana Lokteff: You are different! You are making that clear every day. The solution is to go back to Pakistan where literally everyone is like you! In Pakistan, kids would do the exact same thing to a White kid. So because of this story, he wants “hate speech” inside the home to be prosecuted, because that’s where someone learnt to say “Paki”.

Humza Yousaf: I mentioned that because there’s some here who believe that if racism that is intentionally stirred up using threatening or abusive language takes place at home with a sibling, child, or grandchild present, or that they were the ones that that hatred maybe was even directed towards, that that should not be prosecuted.

My contention is that the impact is exactly the same, regardless of where hatred is intentionally stirred up or whoever is the target of that stirring up, whether that is at home or out with the home.

Lana Lokteff: Yeah, let’s hear what they say about White people at home. Again, there’s a country called “Pakistan”. Go there! No, it’s about pushing Islam in our face! They can’t even get along with their Indian Hindu brothers. Humza wants to do whatever damage he’d like without facing any criticism and hide behind the words “Islamophobia” and “racism”, much like the word “anti-semitic”. It’s a trick! I’m sure he wishes he could throw me in prison for seven years for my video.

In fact, he even sicks the cops on an SNP supporter, a supporter of his own party after they sent him an email calling him a “racist piece of shit” after constantly attacking White Scots.

Humza Yousaf: White! White! White! White! Headed by people who are White! White! White! Every chair of every public body, White! That is not good enough!

Lana Lokteff: The new hate crime legislation was described by SNP veteran Jim Sillars as:

“One of the most pernicious and dangerous pieces of legislation ever produced by any government in modern times and in any part of the United Kingdom.”

Are you surprised a Muslim who hates European people would be pushing this? I’m not.

The Scotsman article doesn’t post a link to my video so people can hear my words in their fullness.

But as usual they post a few half quotes and cite other dirty, corrupt Lefties like the SPLC as their source for why you can’t listen to me. She’s bad because these people said! So they don’t and can’t refute anything. They never do they just shout “Nazi! White supremacist!”, and then they conveniently omitted the part where Humza Yusaf is disgusted that Scotland is a White country!

[06:20]

Humza Yousaf: White! White! White! White! White people who are White White. White! White! That is not good enough!

Lana Lokteff: Humza claims he is suffering from racist abuse. Oh please! He is protected by the entire White Scottish establishment, sitting in the highest office and he’s whining about a few comments online stating the fact that he’s not a Scottish man. He may have a Scottish passport, but he is not a Scottish man! The police should be investigating him for inciting hate against the White majority in Scotland. How is he suffering? People have the right to respond to and criticise a man holding a powerful position in politics, especially after he charged an entire race of people.

If he is so disgusted by Scottish men, he should return to Pakistan. This is the logical conclusion. It’s all Pakistanis in government in Pakistan and no one ever, ever says “Pakistan is too brown”!

People have the right to call out his political duplicity, one standard for Pakistan and another for Scotland. So they accuse us of being “racist, abusive and inciting terrorism” for pointing out that he is of Muslim Pakistani background, questioning his interests. But it’s not hateful of him to charge all of Scotland and White countries for being too White, calling them all racist because they exist as a majority in the nation of their ancestors! Pakistan would never let a White man be in charge in their country.

You see, Yusuf is just upset that I’ve called him out. I’ve hit a nerve because I am right. He is not an oppressed minority.

Well, I think it’s hilarious that Humza responded to my video. But of course he turned it around like:

“Poor me! See, I am an oppressed abused minority!”

He called for swift action to remove my videos from BitChute since they are in the UK. Humza has the entire lying corporate media behind him, but shut down my videos because I am the threat! Yeah, because I actually tell the truth.

Where is the lie in my video though? Where is it? And where is the call for violence and terrorism? He is attacking the White race of Scotland as a public leader of millions, how is that not inciting hate? His kind of hate as a public authority is what leads to genocide. Humza claimed:

“As First Minister, I’m determined to use the office to help build the country where all of our citizens live a life free from hatred.”

Yeah, all the non-White citizens that is! Charging the entire country for being too White, is not a Scottish country where all citizens are free and protected from hate! The Scotsman article goes on and on to attack Red Ice, sourcing the same old tired anti-White Lefty sources.

[08:53]

Basically, we’ve been banned on the big platforms for truth telling and now they’re complaining that we still exist on alternative platforms and Twitter. So shut them down! Even whined about my blue check. [chuckling] It gets better! Martin McLaughlin. Yeah, (((Laughlin))). The lying journalist activist writes an entire piece defaming and attacking me, and he gets cool-headed, honest, to the point responses to his lies, and he cries:

“Nazis! And they’re attacking me!”

This is a classic example of crying out in pain as they strike you. He starts blocking everyone, including me, and I didn’t even tweet at him. Brave journalism, Martin!

And then his editor, Neil Macintosh, posted this lame article and tweet something about:

“Standing against Nazi descendants.”

Wow! That’s pathetic, Neil. You dish out the lies, stoke up the anti-White fires, but cry “Nazi” when a few people call it out.

In response to their Nazi post. I even saw another Lefty call out the SNP’s Nazi past.

So you have Conservatives calling these commies Nazis. And you have Lefties still untrusting because of the SNP’s Nazi ties 89 years ago! They just cry fascist and Nazi at each other all day long. It’s all they’ve got!

This Scotsman is hardly Scottish. Owned by a huge corporation since 2020, it has been owned by the National World Group. And the most hits they’ve had in a long time are from this story. [chuckling] Most of their tweets get 1300 or so views. Ours got over 100,000 views!

Yusaf is a practicing Muslim. Islam doesn’t belong in Europe, it’s not part of our native faith! And we have every reason to be skeptical, considering Islam’s past. And, by the way, do Islamic countries allow Christians and pagans? Yeah, exactly! Yusuf may say he’s progressive and he’s for Scotland, as many jews say that. And they’re Conservatives in their homeland, liberal in ours. It’s the art of subversion! The Art of War! And they play Global Europeans.

In Islam. They have something called “Taqiya”, where they can deny their religious belief or practice when they feel they are threatened. Taqiya is the action of committing a sinful act for a pious goal. A related term is “kitman”, the action of covering and in Shiaism they are permitted to conceal their religion when under threat of persecution or compulsion.

So the first minister can say:

“Yes, I support gay sex!”

Although Islam doesn’t, and he’s a practicing Muslim, as a means to an end.

In other words, he can lie to further an Islamic agenda.

[11:29]

By the way. He didn’t show up to the vote on gay marriage because of religious pressure from mosques. That day he conveniently had to be in Pakistan to try and bail out a “Scotsman”. Yeah, you’re looking at the Scotsman, from death over blasphemy charges. A Scotsman on Blasphemy charges in Pakistan! Look again, not a Scottish man.

This is where his priorities lie with Muslims and Pakistanis. He cared more about this one guy on death row in Pakistan than the Pakistani rape gangs in the UK. Well, check him out when he asked if he thinks gay sex is a sin, when he is put on the spot.

Interviewer (female): You say there that you don’t allow your personal faith to impact legislation. And you say very clearly there that you think that equal marriage is something that’s important and something that you fully back. The question was, do you believe that gay sex was a sin?

Humza Yousaf: No. If I can just be clear about that. I’ve been asked that question about 25 times and I’ve answered it the same way 25 times.

So I can’t change what’s in certain faiths, I can’t change what’s in scripture. What I can tell you is the approach that I will take, which is that I will not allow personal faith to be the basis of legislation.

Lana Lokteff: Yeah, right! He can’t separate being a Muslim from politics. It’s very intertwined. He’s also annoyed and agitated because he does think it’s a sin. According to Islam, it is. But he’s practicing Taqiya. He isn’t who he says he is, but he has said enough for us to know who he is. Not a friend to Europeans! And definitely not fighting for the best interest of Scottish people.

Scotland needs Braveheart, not more hostile foreigners and Pakistanis!

[Mel Gibson in Braveheart]:

“They may take our lives, but they’ll never take our freedom! Scotland!”

Henrik Palmgren: Thank you so much to our executive producers: Lothrop Stoddard, V Miller. Resin Revolt, Goodlucklap, Jake, Red-pill Rundown, Choccymilk, French47, Mark Smith. No1jeeves, President OBunga, Mongoose, William Fox, Angry White Soccer Mom, The 2nd Wanderer, Operation Werewolf, The Ride Never Ends, Francis Parker Yockey, Dylbob, Lastplacesimp, Joseph Hart, PurpleHaze and Jay P. Thank you, guys.

Producers: Also, Mr. Walker. 696Yuanson, Leroy Dumonde, Snarkpup, Eyesopen, Mr. Lemery, Uri Obadah Hakeswill, Single Action Army and Jorj Porj.

We’d love to have some new guys in there as well. And gals, for that matter. We’d love to get 20 more executive producers aboard. We’re going to set that as a new goal so we can continue to expand.

So thank you, guys. Please consider that if you want to do something extra for us and ensure that we can continue and hire more people and do more good stuff.

[14:55]

END

top

============================================

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/7/2023 = 82)

Comment as
0/2000
Comment
HyperChat min: 1

@SolusVir
1 day ago
These aren’t TRUE SCOTSMEN, obviously.

43
0
Hide replies
My brother-in-law weighs 600 pounds and hates white people
4 hours ago
ha, I see what you did there, and you are correct he will never be Scottish.

1
0
Hide replies
Gabe Lakmann
4 hours ago
Yeah, that was pretty clever.

@CZR
1 day ago
sick of all these “minorities”, which are larger in number in the world population than whites, constantly complain about being in a white country. move to one of the MANY countries where people are the same race & religion as you if you don’t like it.
white people should be just as racist as all these other races are toward whites. and Christian countries need to ban non-Christians/white from citizenship. wake up gentiles!

41
10
Hide replies
In Scelus Speramus
18 hours ago
i don’t like christianity

23
8
Hide replies
Heartland
18 hours ago
Exactly. Xtianity is also another foreign import into the west.

18
9
Show reply
Per-Inge Eliasson
11 hours ago
Me neither. Christianity is like the light version of judaism.

16
0

@Rileybuns
1 day ago
Tell us again about White fragility you weak, pitiful, pathetic non-Whites who screech and stamp your feet the second you’re called out on your sh*t. Can dish it but can’t take it? Humza is a walking skidmark and so are the Scottish traitors siding with him.

29
0
Unelected Expert
1 day ago
I take it The Scotsman is to Scotland what The New York Times is to the US of A?

28
0
Hide replies

@Now-Beowulf-Spake
22 hours ago
Yes.

6
0
Father Padrigo
23 hours ago
Way to go, Lana. As the saying goes, you only get flak when you’re over the target.

23
0
Lampshade Denier
22 hours ago
Browns are only good at stealing what Whites create. They need to be deported out of our White countries!

21
0

@doobeedoo
1 day ago
Imagine being such a pathetic dirty Pakistani trash line that clown speaking in a Scottish accent as of he’s an actual Scot lol he thinks he’s a Scot

21
0
I’m back
22 hours ago
Scots need to find their inner William Wallace before the loose their country!

21
1
By Their Works
22 hours ago
Subversive non-Whites and race traitor whores are going to keep tightening the noose until all Whites are slaves and until we are bred/raped and murdered out if we continue to let them. The sooner we get active, the better chance we have to repel the scum, and rebuild the White world. They know that, and that’s why they are accelerating the lawfare and the invasions of all White nations. We need to stop buying into an image of ourselves created by our enemy and remember who we really are. The best warriors (and everything else) nature has ever made. Our inherent goodness is our Achilles heal. It is supposed to be reserved for ourselves. We don’t owe non-Whites anything at all. Taking back your own lands from invaders is not terrorism, no matter what some rat says.

20
0
Lady Bret Crain
1 day ago
this infuriates me it’s absolutely disgusting send all the foreigners and the Jews that let them in back… Leave Europe alone let it be European let Scotland be Scottish !!!

19
0
Hide replies
In Scelus Speramus
18 hours ago
stop paying them interest and taxes

4
0
renunciate
1 day ago
Telling the truth is a threat now? What does that say about hummus youza?

17
0
Pure
23 hours ago
I dont care at all whether pakis are brown, black, violet, green or white. The fact that pakis are pakis and do paki things is the point. And the reason i dont want any pakis in my country, not the skin color. Obviously the prime paki knows that, but tries to make it seem like native europeans are so utterly stupid and irrational that they simply dont like certain colors. So again, to him native europeans are not only a race that must be replaced and punished, but that they are on subhuman level.

17
0
Hide replies
By Their Works
22 hours ago
Yes, every time these retarded liars try to use this false framing we need to make a point of it. This is why i prefer to say Negroids, as opposed to “black people”, as if they are just like us, but happen to be darker. Yeah right.

7
0
Show reply

@JOUJOU
13 hours ago
EXACTLY! WELL SAID! They are like poison dart frogs, in a way! You may be all for the frog, like the coloring etc…. and if you try to avoid it or contain it, you could be accused of discrimination, etc…. But they’re poisonous and can hurt you, and so you try to be careful. The same is true of skunks.
AND, for what it is worth, ironically, the only countries I EVER planned to maybe emigrate to if the “SHTF” were ones that were predominantly WHITE.I didn’t do that because I was racist, but simply because I would fit in better and knew I would have fewer problems with racism, etc…. It would be bad enough living down the garbage reputation some americans apparently worked so hard to get. Of course I would speak the local language and try to come close to the local accent. The UN and WEF destroyed my zeal to emigrate though. 8(

1
0
I’m here to radicalize
23 hours ago
Scotland is committing suicide by not removing these sand nogs from their country.

14
1
Hide replies
Dick Head Jr.
15 hours ago
*being murdered.

5
0
WhiteLightWhiteHeat
18 hours ago
Go Lana. Expose the hateful crybaby for what he is!!!!

12
0

@TheLastBoyScout
18 hours ago
I’m sick of these shitskins!!! They all gotta go!!! Fuck this paki POS!!!

12
0

@starchip769
22 hours ago
Fuck you Yousaf you clown racist if you don’t like white people piss off back home or at least to the place you think is home.

12
0

@JoeVlogs
23 hours ago
Unreal. This is the supreme example of “being over the target.” O/

12
0
Dick Head Jr.
15 hours ago
Keep speaking truth to power, Lana.

11
0
Hello. Ye be fren or foe ?
21 hours ago
On a side note … this is good free advertising :fire_up:

9
0
Hide replies

@JustAnotherODCer
17 hours ago
Good point.

3
0
Lampshade Denier
22 hours ago
If Pakis didn’t resent being Pakis, why do they risk life and limb to live in White countries?

10
0

@SheepdogShack
18 hours ago
Scottish cops are all literal Antifa pedophiles, their lives are forfeit.

9
0

@LordAragorn
20 hours ago
Paiki Orc!

8
0

@Jewmadbro
20 hours ago
Smelly paki subhuman

9
0

@WesternRevival
19 hours ago
GREAT JOB LANA !!
We need to Pack up these Aliens and Ship their Arses Back to THEIR NATIONS Where they should be !

7
0

@Trump_Nukem6
20 hours ago
EUROPA THE LAST BATTLE (2019)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/YDyz9eZKkSQv/
https://archive.org/details/ETLB_Europa_Net
(Alt Link)
OSWALD MOSLEY EUROPEANS (2016)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/CpPpZ6OyFYFP/
YOU ARE AMALEK 1-3 (2022)



WORLDWIDE SATANIC FREEMASONRY

COMPILATION OF MEDIA AND GOVERNMENT PUSHING FOR WHITE REPLACEMENT (KALERGI PLAN)

CRYPTO JEWS
Jews tend to lie about their race. It’s called ‘Crypto Judaism’ and is the secret adherence to Judaism while publicly professing to be of another faith.
Practitioners are referred to as ‘Crypto Jews’ (Greek Kryptos meaning hidden)
JEWS SPECIALTY
Jews do subversion and social manipulation. That’s a fact. Japanese specialise in science and tech. Germans specialise in engineering. Jews specialise in subversion and social manipulation.
JEWS EXPELLED HISTORY

Jews expelled 1030 times

KEY POINTS TO REMEMBER
Georgia Guidestones, Denver Airport Murals, United Nations Mural, Jewish Melting Pot Plan AKA Kalergi Plan
More

7
0
Grey Templar
22 hours ago
Publics services should nt allow fuckn moron that cannot even speak properly …
He s a fuckn retard and you can feel the hate when he say the word white …
They should throw him out of office period .

7
0
Under The Radar
1 day ago
The world has spun out of control in every way possible. I hope there is a AI takeover that wipes them all out.

6
0

@YouKnowTheGuy
15 hours ago
What the fuck is going on in the West right now?

6
0
thebluebeastie
21 hours ago
the stabbing and rapping is looked down on in western societies, used to be

6
0
Matt Hammond
10 hours ago
That cheeky fucking bastard foreign parasite enemy combatant, whose people have raped, sexually enslaved and even murdered our underage white daughters in their thousands, better be prepared for the consequences of his actions when nationalists come to power. He will be very fucking lucky to get off with mere repatriation. And those fucking criminal traitor scum police that not only ignored, but actually covered up these awful, heart-breaking crimes are in deep fucking shit too. Trials await you cunts!!! Take your hate speech bollocks and cram it!!! Trials await!!!

5
0
Swedes Are White
10 hours ago
Send them all back

5
0
Asadafa
12 hours ago
I lived with a German family for a brief time and am still friends with the son. He told me back then that he and his (French) mother and sister lived in Spain for thee years and was made fun of for being a “nazi” (more like “nathi”) as a 9yo. It is a part of being a foreigner. Stay amongst your own or grow a thicker skin. Pakis do not need to be colonizing any part of Europe. They have a big enough country and can use birth control or move to israel if not.

5
0

@LudditeStrength
14 hours ago
Insane that Scotland spends their money & time investigating y’all lol

5
0
Bigot Smalls
14 hours ago
what a lying sack of enemy shit. he never noticed his parents or siblings were brown and very different? fuck you. how the hell are Whites so naive?

5
0

@JustAnotherODCer
17 hours ago
Facts cited, as in using anti-whites’ own words to point out their hypocrisy, are now called, “hate facts.”
Well, I LOVE hate facts and Mrs Palmgren is laying out clearly AND strongly. A beautiful white woman, mother, & wife.
Bravo Lana bravo, & t/y.

5
0

@owengrant86
18 hours ago
We have to stop using words because action is the only way out now, the longer we take to accept that the worse it will get and before long it will be too late. Communists/Jews are taking action whilst we just keep using words, we are losing the culture war.

5
0
Sheeeeeeeit
1 day ago
ALBA GU BRATH….indeed :flag_scotland:

5
0

@ScotChann
9 hours ago
Red ice should thank the fake mainstream media for the free advertisements. Many Scots will now be supporting Red Ice TV. Humza is the least liked foreigner in Scotland.

3
0

@Trimax
11 hours ago
RedIce you are doing great job. He should be deported for his hate towards white civilization.

4
0

@bcor29
12 hours ago
Red Ice is over the target :thumbs_up:

3
0
Goycott carunka
14 hours ago
ooh nooo lol someone said bad things about my raysisums towards native Scotts

4
0
Apollonian Slumber
15 hours ago
Nice one Lana.

4
0
suckmychannel
18 hours ago
Oh, believe me, far “worse” is said daily in pubs and housing schemes all over Scotland.
Scottish media live in a fantasy world, obsessed with celebrities and stupid shit like UFO’s & ghosts.

4
0

@TheLastBoyScout
18 hours ago
we are quickly getting to the point where violence against these traitorous antiwhites, Jews and shitskins will be necessary. We will make them regret taking advantage of our kindness and abusing our people after we took pity on them and allowed them in to our country’s.

4
0

@dirk_diggler
6 hours ago
Europeans needs to wake up right now

2
0

@Torwell
7 hours ago
Lana beefing with the Prime Minister of Scotland was not on my bingo card. I’m loving it.
Logos rising friends!

3
0
Christina the Astonishing
7 hours ago
Unintimidated!! :star_struck:

2
0
White Supreme Pizza with extra spices
8 hours ago
If Scotland is predominantly White how did this brown cunt get into this position?? Are there that many self hating Whites in Scotland??

3
0
Meow
9 hours ago
We love our racism in Scotland. (It’s pronounced reeecism by the way – reee reee reee)
GB News was even accused of reeecism for calling this creep Humza Useless. In effect, any criticism of him is racist, as any criticism of Nicola Sturgeon was misogyny.

2
0
Talmudvision Zogberg
10 hours ago
Evil looking ugly dirty Paki bastard, fuck off and die!

2
0
Ferrum_Intra
10 hours ago
7:20
He can’t even comb his hair or shave his disgusting beard when addressing the parliament…
It’s so clear that they hate anyone of European descent with a fiery passion.

3
0

@JOUJOU
13 hours ago
If whites were to dare to say that some arab countries should be white, you can bet those countries would scream racism, even though it seems some of them WERE white. But whites aren’t even supposed to have a home, according to them. And if whites are telling lies, etc…. WHAT DO THEY CARE? I mean we OBVIOUSLY don’t even have weapons, planes, cars, or ships. We are too feeble minded to get such things! They claim we don’t even have a CULTURE! I heard a black yesterday say that whites would have NOTHING if it weren’t for blacks.
It would be nice if we could see the racial makeup of everyone at a glance. I bet a lot of lies would suddenly STOP! It is amazing how many mexicans and other hispanics suddenly end up at a loss for words when they find out they have genes from the iberian peninsula! I guess they all figured that spanish was stolen from the countries THEY claim to love so much. And the iberian peninsula is in EUROPE!

3
0

@MaybeNextTime
21 hours ago
I bet that kid thanks his Parents now !

3
0

@peterflynn2912
22 hours ago
Has Mr. Yusuf ever used the word “gora”? The pakis’ word denotes a white or fair-skinned person.

3
0

@FEDFEDFED
6 hours ago
Being Muslim and yes, brown, makes you out of place in a white, European country. In the same way a white European person would be out of place in a Muslim country. Your parents abandoning your country was thier first mistake.

2
0
LargeNoseCollider
10 hours ago
Quality polis

1
0
unorthodox normie
11 hours ago
I like the fact that his “office” is on the warpath about it, means he has most likely seen the videos lol

2
0

@Dive2663225
11 hours ago
I wonder…How much rehearsal…This Clown did…To speak..like a Scot ..for this public speech….Can We Hear This Speech in Paki ?

1
0
Hello. Ye be fren or foe ?
21 hours ago
Imprisoned ? He wants you dead …

1
0
Truth
3 hours ago
great clip, fuc all them antiwhite racist fucs.

1
0
Luke
4 hours ago
Good! More publicity!

1
0

@spartan0670
6 hours ago
police are cunts dropped my support defund

1
0
Tune Soop
6 hours ago
Surely you have grounds to sue for slander, or something?

1
0
All political expressiveness is flatulence; censor a fart and it will come back as thunder.
7 hours ago
those scenes from bravehart are terribly white :-):-):-)

1
0
None
18 hours ago
he has a lovely story, im sure its real in his imagination

1
0

@whitegirlmagic
4 hours ago
i see two people from yousafs office have this video too.

Talmudvision Zogberg
10 hours ago
McLaughlin is pronounced McLocklin Lana :laughing:

@dirtylizard
17 hours ago
He’s as Scottish as whiskey and haggis

In Scelus Speramus
18 hours ago
watch out humza’s one of those government-protected thugs
https://archive.org/details/illustrationshi00thorgoog/page/n9/mode/1up

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett at The Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — Transcript

Patriotic Weekly Review – with Blair Cottrell – Dec 4, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Dangerfield – Talking Tough with Mark Collett – Mar 28, 2020 — Transcript

============================================

PDF Download

top

• Total words in post = xxx
• Total words in transcript = xxx
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB): (Available later)

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Sat, Jun 10, 2023 — Published post. Includes Odysee comments (82).

Mark Collett: Hello and good evening everybody, and welcome to tonight’s stream. Now, you’ll be well aware that this stream tonight replaces my usual prerecorded weekly video. And it is a very special stream with a very special guest. So I’ll be introducing very shortly.

Now, the purpose of tonight’s stream, which is live on Odyssey. It’s live on DLive, and it’s live on Radio Albion.com. And the purpose of tonight’s dream is to give you all an introduction to the Workers of England Union, but also allow you all to ask questions or ask for legal advice. Because our guest I’ll be introducing very shortly is a practicing legal professional. He is a fully qualified, practicing English solicitor, who runs his own company. He is the perfect man to be answering questions.

And you can ask him in the second half of the show anything you want relating to the Workers of England Union for legal advice. Or if somebody has come to you with anything like this “Freeman of the Land” stuff, or other more sort of out there legal ideas, this would be a great time to ask them.

Now, if you want to contribute to the show, you can contribute in a number of ways. The first way is to send Superchats through Entropy. You can send paid Superchats through entropy, and the Entropy link will be placed in the chat throughout the evening. The second way is through Odyssey. You can click the support button. There’s a little dollar sign. If you click that, you can send a Superchat. And any message attached to a paid donation, we will read out live on stream and we will ask to Robin Tilbrook.

Now, if you don’t have any money but do have a good point to make, you can do that through entropy. You can ask nonpaid questions also through entropy. And if you like me a lot and want to contribute in other ways, you can either send crypto-currency donations remember crypto-currency, those magic beans! They’re all worthless now. So you can give me them all. You don’t need them anymore. And you can also write to me at mark@thefallofwesternman.com.

Now, this is a very important stream tonight because more and more political dissidents on the Right are facing draconian, or anti-White, legislation. People get sacked from their jobs, they get discriminated against. And now we have a way to fight back. And that’s what the Workers of England Union does. But I’m going to let Robin tell you more about that in a couple of seconds. But I’m going to give this guy an introduction because he really, really does deserve an introduction.

Now, I’ve known Robin for a long time. He would probably tell you too long! It’s been well over a decade since I’ve met Robin Tilbrook. And he’s one of the most genuine, nicest and most approachable people I have ever met. And he doesn’t get really the accolades within the movement that he deserves. In fact, he’s one of those guys that does an immense amount of work at his own cost behind the scenes. And he’s not out there on streams very often. He’s not there front and centre. He’s not sending thousands of begging letters, he’s not getting huge amounts of donations for what he does. He donates his time. And he has real effects in the real world, and that’s very important. I’m going to give you a very short of example of what kind of man he is, and I think this will resonate with most people watching.

Now, during the Covid madness, I had a very good friend who I’ve been friends with for quite some time, friends with her since she was a member of the BNP, when I was a member of the BNP. And she had been discriminated against in the workplace because she was exempt from wearing a mask and they had forced mask wearing upon her. And on a Sunday evening, she was up the wall with panic because she hadn’t prepared anything for this legal tribunal. And she texted me and said, look, Mark, I’m desperate. I need help. I’m out of my depth. What can I do? And I gave her Robin’s number. And on a Sunday evening, Robin answered that call. He helped that girl. And many of you will have read about her in the newspapers. Because she was the first and most notable person in the country to win a discrimination case against her employer, because she was forced to wear a mask. That made national news.

And Robin, he doesn’t come out here tooting his own horn. He doesn’t send begging letters saying, look what I’ve done. He’s not there on all the streams getting accolades for the work he does. But that’s the kind of guy he is if you need help, he’s always there. And he’s always willing to give up his free time, even on a Sunday evening, to help somebody who is part of our greater community, who has fallen foul of this anti-White, anti-commonsense, anti-Christian system we live in.

So please give a warm round of applause for Robin Tilbrook. And, Robin, give yourself a bit of an introduction and tell us about the Workers of England Union and the progress it’s made since it came into being.

Robin Tilbrook: Well, Mark, you certainly given me a good introduction there. Thank you very much for that, and thank you for your kind words. So, yes, I’m a solicitor. I’m also the chairman of the Workers of England Union, and chairman of the English Democrats. As far as the Workers of England Union concerned, part of the reason why we founded it is obviously we wanted to mention the “E” word, which none of the other unions were prepared to mention. So obviously it’s called the Workers of England.

We also wanted to be something that the establishment unions aren’t, which is a union that basically sticks up for it’s members and will do whatever is necessary in the legal system to try and protect members from whatever’s happening in their workplace.

And during the lockdown we saw this really being brought home as to exactly what that meant. Because for instance, we had a woman who had been a member of Unison for something like 15 years. She had never asked them to do anything. She had asthma and she was being asked to wear a mask at work. It wasn’t a role where you would think that she’d actually need to wear a mask because she wasn’t really having much contact with the public, even if you accepted the whole narrative about masks being necessary, which I must say I wouldn’t. But some people did of course.

But anyway, she was being told that she had to wear a mask. And so she approached her union, Unison, and said:

“I need some help with this, I need to grievance this demand. And I need to be helped through any disciplinary proceedings that might follow, if I don’t wear the mask.”

And lo and behold, Unison then responded saying they weren’t going to help, because they said:

“That it was against Labour Party policy, what she wanted to do.”

And the fact is the big unions are not there for their members, it seems to me. What they’re there for is to advance the Labour Party cause. And you see this also in another thing that Workers of England are unique about, which is we don’t have workplace reps. What we have is people who come in, they’re paid for by the union, and they represent you in your grievances or trying to resist unfair disciplinary procedures against you.

Whereas the Labour supporting unions, mostly have people who are just simply a workplace colleague. They’re not paid for by the union. But they are on the other hand, fellow employees who if they over do their keenness to help you, are likely to be the next ones to get sacked. Obviously got a conflict of interest straight away. And you’re not getting a good service there, I don’t think. But it’s anyway hit and miss.

But the main thing about it is of course it doesn’t cost you anything and that means that they can give more money to Labour. And that is their main function it seems to me. And I just think that’s completely wrong. It’s not what members expect to be paying for when they join a union. And so in effect you haven’t really got very professional unions in this country. And that matters a lot because the employers are often very clueless about basic rights and legal obligations about dealing with their employees. Is that enough, Mark?

[09:44]

Mark Collett: No. Say as much as you need, Robin. I mean, I was going to come in with a question and just say, obviously there are many political dissidents today who are either traditionalists, they are Christians, they are anti-immigration activists. They hold views that a few decades ago would have seemed very, very normal. But in today’s society, there are political zealots who more or less want to turn everything normal, natural and healthy on its head. And now making simple comments in the workplace, or even outside of the workplace, can see people discriminated against, or even losing their jobs. And Workers of England, Union, as far as I am aware, is the only union in England that is willing to defend people who are being discriminated against, because their political views fall outside of the current liberal political dichotomy. Would you agree with that?

Robin Tilbrook: That’s certainly the case, as far as I’m aware. I’m not aware of any other union that would do. So the point there, Mark, is as a union we are trying to represent our members. So if a member has got an issue, and we can do anything about it, we will try and do. And that doesn’t mean that we’re necessarily endorsing a particular point of view. It just simply means that we’re going to stick up for our members as best we can.

And I think that is a service that is much needed. And it’s also a service that is not being provided by anybody else. And it just seems to me obvious once you stand back and think about it, but actually that is exactly what unions ought to be doing!

Mark Collett: I completely agree. I mean, obviously we do have a situation with, say, the mainstream unions that would definitely go out to bat for anyone who was a part of a group like BLM, or anyone who was part of, say, a trans activist group that felt they were discriminated against in any way. And there are these huge, very well funded bodies doing that. But with you being the only one that is doing that for people who are sort of political dissidents on the right of the political spectrum, how can people get involved? What are the fees, how much is it to join, and what’s expected of people who do sign up?

Robin Tilbrook: Well, not very much is expected, but the union is on the internet, of course. We have a website, Workers of England Union dot co dot UK. And you can join up there. There’s a monthly fee of just under £10. That’s a reasonably cheap fee by comparison to some of the big unions. So the big unions are not offering value for money, but that’s because their purpose is to look after Labour [Party]. We’re not affiliated with any other party, we’re not even affiliated in terms of trade union law with the English Democrats. Obviously I am also an English Democrat, but that’s not the point. The point is we’re not there to provide money for, the union is not there to provide money for the English Democrats. It’s there to look after it’s members and to focus on doing that.

And we don’t get involved in the sort of campaigns that’s currently going on with the nurses, where the big Labour supporting unions are basically trying to get the nurses to go out on strike for a huge pay rise claim. And they’re not thinking in the interest of the nurses at all! What all that is about is trying to produce a cause for Labour to fight over, and to attack the Conservative government. I’ve got no problem with somebody attacking the Conservative government! But the fact is they’re not there for their members. They’re there for the Labour Party and they are partisans for the Labour Party. And I just don’t think that is what people expect. And they’re being sort of dragooned into doing things that aren’t actually in their own individual interests.

[14:34]

Mark Collett: Now, with the Labour controlled unions or the Labour affiliated unions, you’ve explained to me in the past how they funnel huge amounts of their members money into the Labour Party. And how often the Labour Party actually gives them, when in power, huge grants from the taxpayer, which the union then feeds back to the Labour Party. So it’s the Labour government either taxpayer, that gives money to the union and then the union gives it back not to the government or the people, but to the Labour Party itself.

Do you want to briefly explain that? Because I actually find that quite corrupt and quite astonishing. And I think most normal people wouldn’t know how the unions and the Labour Party work hand in glove to basically siphon both the public’s money and members money into the Labour Party coffers.

Robin Tilbrook: So first of all, there is a legal rule that a trade union can’t make a profit. And that’s partly about trying to make sure that any extra money that’s made is funneled back, like you say, into Labour. Also, if the union is a member of the TUC, one of the conditions of being a member of the TUC is that they are Labour supporting, and that means that they have a political fund where any excess money is put into that and then handed over to Labour.

And on top of that, one of the oddities of the labour market system, is that many big employers, and particularly state employers, have union reps who are full-time union reps, and they work either for the union or for the Labour Party directly itself, but they’re being paid for by the taxpayer.

So when the English Democrats won the Mayority of Doncaster, we looked into what was going on in Doncaster. And they got eight full-time trade union reps, that were notionally working for Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council, but in fact did no work whatsoever for Doncaster Metropolitan Council at all! And instead were working full-time for Labour and for the trade union.

There’s been a Freedom of Information act request recently about the National Health Service in England. And it turns out that the English National Health Service is paying £27 million a year for workplace reps like this, which are full-time people who are not doing the job that they’re paid to do! And obviously that is a way of cycling money off the taxpayer, to fund the Labour movement.

Mark Collett: So essentially it is basically a huge scam! Whereas the money that you guys get, that goes primarily to frontline activities. And I don’t know how much you can say about this, but you’ve had a huge number of successes already.

Now, I know that many people who are activists and supporters of Patriotic Alternative, they are also members of the Workers of England Union. And they’re very happy to talk about that, and to promote Workers of England Union. Because any of those people who have had problems at work have obviously come to the union and had excellent legal representation. I’m not sure if you can give any examples of any cases, but if you can, please do. Because I gave one earlier of the lady who was discriminated against. She worked for a major car manufacturer. Now, that was a pretty notable case, because it was all over the news, wasn’t it? That got major newspaper coverage in sort of every mainstream paper. It was on national news. But you’ve had several cases like this where you have successfully represented people. So please give us an example of that because I’m sure people would like to hear.

[19:10]

Robin Tilbrook: Yes, so you’re right, Mark. The difficulty is, of course, that without members saying that we can name them, that wouldn’t be right to do so, I don’t think. But we can talk about the type of cases that we have been winning.

So we have been winning cases relating to discrimination. And the type of cases that you’re thinking of I think of come under the heading of a “system of philosophical belief” and basically if somebody has a “system of philosophical belief” and they’re then discriminated against very often, certainly if they’re discriminated against in the workplace, the union is likely to be able to help them. And I think that’s important.

We were in a phase up until quite recently, where most of the cases that you’re hearing about were people who were on the Left who had been discriminated against on the basis of system philosophical belief. So there was a case of a vegan. There has been a case of somebody who’s a Democratic Socialist. And various others who sought to rely on that position.

But now we’re at the point where, for instance, we had a case where it was upheld that you couldn’t discriminate against somebody who’s an English nationalist. You can’t discriminate against people who have religious beliefs. So, for instance, one of our cases involved a Catholic woman and she didn’t want to have the jabs. And we won the point that she had a protected characteristic! I’m quite optimistic about where this is all going in terms of the kind of cases that we’re winning. Is that basically what you were asking me about?

Mark Collett: No, definitely. And I want to make this clear as well because this is something you and I have spoken about privately. There’s a lot of hesitation from people to get involved in nationalist politics of any sort. Now, people might say, well, getting involved in Patriotic Alternative, you guys talk about race and ethnicity. But you’re the chairman of the English Democrats and, you know, that people are nervous to speak about anything. They’re nervous to speak about the boats at Dover. They’re nervous to speak about demographics in any sense. They’re nervous to give any sort of pushback against nonsense such as White privilege, or anything else that sort of chips away at us on either a racial, or a cultural level.

Now, that kind of expression is actually protected. And I want you just to say a little bit about that, because people don’t think they have any protections to speak about politics. They think the protected characteristics are essentially just race, disability, gender, sexual orientation, and religion, which are the ones covered by the police when they talk about this hate crime legislation. But in fact, when it comes to the workplace, and discrimination that you can take civil legal action over, political beliefs are covered as well, aren’t they? If you could say that about that, that would be much appreciated.

Robin Tilbrook: Yes. So that’s absolutely right, Mark. Political beliefs are, provided they amount to a system of philosophical belief. So, for instance, if we revert back to the jabs and masks for a moment, if your objection to wearing the mask was that you didn’t think it worked, and you also didn’t like wearing it, we wouldn’t be able to run that as a discrimination against the system and philosophical belief. If, on the other hand, you had a medical condition, such as asthma, we would certainly be able to do that as a discrimination.

But also there might be, for instance, with the jabs, one of, some of the cases we’re arguing about, is that people have a view of “my body, my bodily autonomy” that amounts to a philosophical belief, we think. We’re testing that at the moment.

And so as far as political views are concerned, all sorts of things have been held to be political views. So, for instance, the MOD, we’re trying to sack, a Scottish independence campaigner who was a member of the SMP, I think. And the support for Scottish independence was held to be a system of philosophical belief. And he succeeded in that. That wasn’t one of our cases, of course, because we are the Workers of England, Union, rather workers in Scotland. But I think it makes the point that somebody who has a political point of view, isn’t wide open to being sacked, or sanctioned, or disciplined, or whatever. They do have to be willing to fight their case. This is one of the issues that I think we’ve seen certainly anything on the right of centre, people are often just not willing to put their nose over the parapet and fight for things! And of course what that means is that that issue gets won by the other side.

So we do need people who are willing to fight. But we also, I think, need an organizational structure which supports people in fighting. And obviously that is one of the reasons why we need a trade union like the Workers of England Union.

[25:35]

Mark Collett: Now, that’s a very interesting point you make because we obviously have discussed this privately before, but there’s an awful lot of people out there who immediately assume the worst. So if something happens to you in the workplace and you’re a nationalist, you’re a patriot, you’re a Christian, you’re anti-abortion, you tend to find that people who hold those beliefs, straight away think that they won’t have any recourse. And they’re usually spoken to by maybe family members, friends, colleagues, in a way that makes them lose hope, or thinks it’s not worth fighting or not worth going all of the way.

And I’ve got to say this, I think the system we live in, gets its way a lot of the time because normal people don’t stand up to it. Normal people, and I’m not sure this is a British thing, because when I see the French, their petrol prices go up and you’ll have half a million people bringing Paris to a standstill in Yellow Vests. Our petrol price is double and everyone keeps their heads down, grumbles a little bit, but just getting in the queue for the petrol. British people kind of take things on the chin, and have that kind of stiff upper lip attitude. Where they don’t really think they can do anything about it and think that just soldiering through should be the sort of done thing.

Now, I think, obviously, because of what I do, that the best thing to do is fight tooth and nail for every inch! I mean, what would be your, you know what would be your words on that for people who are feeling maybe a little bit of despair and thinking the best thing to do is just keep their head down, walk away and start again?

Robin Tilbrook: Can I quote a communist on your show?

Mark Collett: You can quote anyone you like! [chuckling]

Robin Tilbrook: There was an East German communist who is a playwright, who said, I think this is something that we all to keep in mind, that he said, obviously in German. He said:

“He who fights may lose, but he who does not fight has already lost.”

And I think that that is something that people have to bear in mind. People need to be thinking that they want to fight for their rights. If you don’t fight for your rights, you lose them! It’s as simple as that.

And that’s basically much of the story of what’s been going on over the last 30, or 40 years, in the country. We’ve got people not willing to fight for traditional rights in any form or another, and traditional views, and patriotic views. And the net result is that the Left has really more or less taken over completely the State.

It’s worth bearing mind however, that I think we rather saw this actually very clearly with the whole lockdown situation. The State is much more pervasive, or establishment, perhaps is a better way of putting it, really than just the State. The establishment is much more pervasive than people imagine. So with lockdown, it turned out that the media weren’t prepared to report any contrary narratives. They were just fully on side! They just went along with it. And nobody who was trying to say anything else was allowed to speak on most of the media. And were not reported in the papers, or anything like that. It was only if something happened in the way of them being arrested, or convicted, or something like that, that it got reported. It was just quite appalling to see how abject most of the mainstream media are!

And I think even those of us that thought they were pretty abject anyway, were surprised just how abject they were, and how little they cared about genuinely telling people what was going on.

And if you think back to the fuel protesters during Tony Blair’s time, they were actually standing up and fighting. But what the establishment had done since, they basically destroyed the businesses of the truckers, and haulage firms, and so on. And they used mass immigration and flooding the market with foreign truckers, that enabled them to destroy people that were actually trying to stand up against the way that government was operating.

So you do have to bear in mind that our system in the UK is really quite, well, I can’t think of any better word to describe it other than authoritarian. The only limitation on the authoritarianism of the British establishment, is actually that they’re pretty inefficient and incompetent. If they were efficient and competent, as well as authoritarian, then we would be in even more trouble than we are.

[31:32]

Mark Collett: Now obviously when people are in the workplace, and when you are going about your normal daily routine in the workplace, what would your advice be for people who ask things, or who express opinions? Do you find that there is boundaries that people have to stay within? Or can you express yourself in the workplace? Because people often see there’s a big distinction between things that people say outside of the workplace, and things that people say within the workplace. Because obviously at one time there was probably a much greater distinction. So if you did something outside of work that would have been treated as outside of work. But obviously today with social media, anything you do on, say, Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram, can obviously impact your working life, or it can be brought into work.

So my question really is, what is the distinction for people legally between doing or saying something outside of work hours, and doing or saying something within, say, the office? So say somebody attended, say, a PA hike, and they had been photographed there, or some Leftist group had said, right, this guy attended it. What would be their rights as opposed to if they openly said in the office:

“I support Patriotic Alternative and everyone should go and sign up”?

Robin Tilbrook: Well, the first thing that we start looking at is whether an employer actually has got anything at all in way of policy on social media, or anything that you do outside of work. Most of them haven’t. And so when you get them trying to interfere in what something has done outside of work, they haven’t got a leg to stand on.

Now, let’s say you’re a member of an ordinary Labour supporting trade union, the trade union rep would certainly refuse to represent you! So you wouldn’t know what your actual position was, and you’d get browbeaten in effect by an HR rep, who didn’t really know what they were doing either, but was determined to try and get you out.

And so therefore you might well have jeopardized your chances of success by not properly fighting the first stages. Because you have to fight the whole thing right from the beginning, rather than hoping that the tribunal is going to come in and right all wrongs, at a later stage.

So it is important to set the thing up properly. And that’s why you do need to have proper experienced trade union reps who actually properly represent you and challenge the employer on all the key points that they need to be challenged on.

Probably, unless you work in some sort of politically sensitive job. I mean, if you were, for instance, one of the spades to the Prime Minister, one of the special political advisers, in which case I think you’d probably struggle if you were shown not to be actually supportive of the Prime Minister, or one of the ministers. But for most people they don’t work in politically sensitive jobs, so it’s a complete nonsense for them to then be victimized. But it happens, it happens quite a lot, particularly in State jobs. And the NHS comes to mind straight away. Their management are very much in cahoots with Labour supporting trade unions. So they’re not really neutral on it, they’re already politically engaged. And it may well be that their political engagement is against whoever we’re talking about.

But the only way to deal with that is to challenge it right from the start and to fight the thing properly. And I would just remind your listeners, Mark, one of the lead cases on this issue is a guy called Redfern. Redfern was a BNP activist who had also stood as a BNP candidate in Derby, I think. And he worked for the local bus company. He had been commended as being a very good employee, I think he was the Employee of the Month for several months. And so it wasn’t anything to do with his work, but once it came out that he had stood for the BNP, the bus company forced him out!

Now, at that time, which is before the current legislation came into force, it’s quite a long time ago now. There was no protection for “system of philosophical belief”. And there was not much protection for somebody like him, who’s a White race nationalist, to claim that what was going on was anti-White. That just wasn’t what the system then allowed.

However, that case was taken all the way through the court and tribunal system in England. And then taken to the European Court of Human Rights, where the European Court of Human Rights said that basically he shouldn’t have been discriminated against. And it was a breach of the European Convention for him to be discriminated against.

So the result is that we now have this system of philosophical belief rule, which does actually allow us to challenge any attack on any particular point of view.

So if Mr Redfern was now sacked, I’d be confident that we would be able to win that case for him. But he would have to get proper representation right from the start, otherwise he might find that he got to the point where he was bringing the case, and not able to argue key points, because they hadn’t been raised with the employer.

[38:42]

Mark Collett: So really, in essence, what we’re saying is people have far more protections than they think they have. It’s just essentially people have been beaten down into believing that if they’re sort of White, straight, Christian, traditionalist, they have nothing! And the only people that can be themselves are people who are pushing narratives that we stand against.

So if you’re walking around the office fundraising for a refugee charity and handing out vegan cupcakes, … God, that’s an awful thought, isn’t it? A vegan cupcake? I shudder at the thought of it! Handing out vegan cupcakes to raise awareness for LGBT children, or something. These people, they obviously are completely at ease doing that. And people who are traditionalists just think:

“We have to bite our lips, and get on with it!”

But really, it’s not like that it’s just our people aren’t used to fighting now, used to putting in that graft and pushing back.

And I’ve got to say, I have pushed back against things before, and it can be quite overwhelming for people, especially when there’s the idea of lots of paperwork, lots of forms to be filled out. Sometimes you have to use those ghastly online portals, where you have to go in and you spend half an hour filling things out, only for a big red bar to come up at the end and say:

“No, you missed something. Go back to stage one.”

Now, you at Workers of England, Union, you do have, I think, a number of full-time employees. So people aren’t on their own. There is a full-time group of people. I know some of them, I’ve spoken to them in the past. Very, very friendly, very, very nice people, very, very welcoming, and they’re there to help. So people aren’t sort of left to do the legwork themselves, are they?

Robin Tilbrook: No, that’s right. Obviously, some aspects of things have to be done by the individual. Like, for instance, you’re saying going into portals, some of these portals require the individual to be doing it, who’s making the complaint. But they’re assisted in what they have to do.

I think the key point is partly people are not aware of what their rights are. They’re also not aware what they could do to protect themselves. And if they’re relying on one of the Labour supporting trade unions to help them, they’re going to find themselves straight away in difficulties. And the fact is, there isn’t organizational support for a lot of people doing things. And that’s obviously part of the reason why we need an organization like the Workers of England Union to support people.

Mark Collett: Now, I do have one other question for you about Workers of England Union. Obviously, Patriotic Alternative exists outside of England. We aren’t just an English nationalist group. We have supporters in Wales, we have supporters in Northern Ireland, and we obviously have a very active group in Scotland.

Now, what is the situation with people outside of England? Because obviously there’s going to be people watching the stream tonight, you’re going to be saying:

“Hey, I’ve really enjoyed all of this, this is absolutely fantastic! And what you’re saying is right up my street, but I live in Scotland.”

Or I live in Northern Ireland. Is there any legal protection from you guys for them? Is there anything they can do?

Robin Tilbrook: So many of the rights are very similar and in some cases identical. But the legal systems are different in Scotland and in Northern Ireland, which makes it very hard for an organization to be covering the whole of the UK the same. Even the Labour sporting trade unions have separate elements, or departments, or structures, for Scotland and Ireland, and maybe also for Wales, I don’t know. But the legal jurisdictions in Great Britain are England, Wales, and Scotland. And then you’ve also got Northern Ireland, and obviously the various islands, like the Isle of Man, and Guernsey, and Jersey. They’ve all got different legal systems.

People tend to think that the UK, when I hear people talk about “British law”, for example. There has never been such a thing as British law, and there never will be. The law is different in England and Wales. And the Welsh government is currently trying to break Wales away from the jurisdiction of England. So there will be a Welsh jurisdiction, and an English jurisdiction, and a Scottish jurisdiction, and Northern Irish jurisdiction. So all I’m just saying is it would be quite hard for us to operate throughout all the jurisdictions, because we’d have to have people who knew how those different jurisdictions actually worked.

[44:32]

Mark Collett: So essentially, then, if we have people in Wales, if we had Welsh supporters, you could represent them, because they fall under, …

Robin Tilbrook: Yeah. We intend to. At the moment, our constitution talks about members being in England only. But we’ve got an EGM coming up in early December, and we’re intending to change that so we can take members who are also in Wales. And that is simply about the jurisdiction point. We want to be able to represent members throughout the jurisdiction of England and Wales.

Mark Collett: That’s superb! We’ve done 45 minutes and we’ve had a few little issues with the stream tonight. Unfortunately, our main platform is not actually working tonight for everyone, so we have vastly depressed numbers, which is very unfortunate. Because obviously we’re hoping for a slew of different questions and so far we have none! [chuckling]

Robin Tilbrook: You are going to have to ask the questions, then, [chuckling] Mark!

Mark Collett: I’m going to have to come up with some questions to kill the next 45 minutes. Because I’m not getting a guest like Robin Tilbrook on the show and not getting our money’s worth. Not that we paid him for anything! But, [chuckling] yeah, unfortunately we don’t have any questions because Odyssey is not working. And I’ve tried it everywhere. I don’t know what the problem is. Very kindly, we have had Tom from Odyssey reach out to us, so I’m sure we can work it out. And I really have to apologize for Robin for giving up his Friday evening for this sort of obviously not to be working, which is quite embarrassing, especially on my count, because I hold, obviously, Robin in very, very high regard.

So I’m a little bit upset about this issue, embarrassed and frustrated. I’ve been tapping away like a mad fool attempting to fix this, but unfortunately, I haven’t managed it yet.

So I’m going to start off with a question that Robin is dying, dying to answer! I’ve got two questions for him that people always ask me. And I want Robin to answer this because I get these questions all the time from people who write in. And Robin’s already smirking because he knows what they’re going to be, and he’s already answered these to me in person.

But I’m going to start with “Freeman of the Land”. There are these people who think a legal defense in a court of law against something like a Public Order Act, charge, etc, in England is to declare themselves as a “Freeman of the Land” and that somehow magically gets rid of every sort of charge against them.

Now, there are several things like this, and I’m being a bit reductive and reducing these down to one thing. What is your advice for people who get arrested? They’re out on a protest. The police kettle them, and the police then, as an intimidatory tactic, begin arresting people, and charging them with some trumped up public order offence. What is your advice to those people?

Robin Tilbrook: They probably wouldn’t be charged straight away, but they might be arrested, and taken off to be interviewed. And obviously one of the things that one has to say to anybody who’s arrested, and the police then try and interview them, is that they simply should absolutely refuse to be interviewed. Unless and until the duty solicitor is present. And at that point, they need to get the duty solicitor to say that they’re not going to give any comment.

And it is one of those extraordinary things that people seem to think, and I often hear people say that:

“If you haven’t done anything wrong, you’ve got nothing to hide, you should then speak.”

But you’ve got to bear in mind the police are not interested in anything that you might say that would tend to get you acquitted, or prevent you from being prosecuted. They are only interested in getting you to say something which will get you convicted.

So you shouldn’t be doing these interviews or saying anything, at these interviews. And if you do, it should be very, it should be on specific advice from a solicitor. And anything else, it’s just very foolhardy indeed!

I generally suggest people look at the Professor from West Virginia telling us why you should never talk to the police, the video out there. And that’s an amusing way of seeing the issue. Because he’s saying that even if you’re innocent, totally innocent and you can say that you were actually in a different part of the country when whatever it is happened, if the police can then produce any witness who says he thought he saw you in that area, even if you completely mistaken, you’re probably going to be convicted.

So it doesn’t even help you to say that you were somewhere else, necessarily. You may well wind up being convicted as a result of having said that. So there is absolutely no benefit, in most cases, to say anything to the police!

[50:36]

Mark Collett: So moving on to somebody who has been charged and they’re in court. Obviously, I’ve had a number of people, … I say lots, I don’t get emails about it every day, but I have had people come to me saying that:

“If you declare yourself a Freeman of the Land, if you declare that you are a Free Englishman.”

And the court has no jurisdiction over you, et cetera. That somehow that’s kind of like magic words, it’s a magic get out of jail free card.

Now, obviously, I know you’ve heard similar things to this, and I know some people say:

“Well, you’re a solicitor, so you’re bound to say that doesn’t work because you’re sort of part of the system.”

Et cetera. I don’t believe that nonsense. I’ve been in court enough times to know, [chuckling] listen to your solicitor! Listen to your solicitor! My advice, this is a question for Robin, but I’m going to tell you what I think anyway, because essentially it’s my show, so I’m going to say what I think.

There are several people you should always listen to, right? Always listen to your dentist! Always listen to your mechanic! Always listen to your solicitor! There are three things that you definitely want to take good advice about! [chuckling] When that guy’s got the drill in your mouth, you don’t want to be saying to him:

“No mate, use the drill with a bigger head and then use that, like, little Hoover thing they put!”

No, no! Let him get on with his business. And the same with your car. You wouldn’t go, you won’t go to your garage, you mechanic at your garage and he says:

“Look, you need this certain size spark plug.”

And you’re like:

“Well, actually, mate, I want one that’s six million bigger!”

Because you just don’t know what you’re talking about. But you do get a lot of people who have read something online and think they’re a legal expert. They think they know it all. So you must have heard about these people that stand up in court and come out with these. I don’t want to malign them, come out with these sort of, how should we say, irregular defenses. What is your advice for those people? And what do you think those people are basing these irregular defenses on? And can you sort of debunk any of them that you’ve heard?

Robin Tilbrook: Yes, the point you make about the Freedom of the Land, it just doesn’t work in a legal court. And if anything, I think people who say that tend to be the butt of jokes, certainly amongst the court staff, and the judges. And the fact is that the legal system isn’t always fair, it isn’t always something that where there’s a big overlap with common sense, but it is the legal system. And you can’t sort of duck out of it by uttering expressions like:

“I’m a Freeman of the land!”

Particularly the sort of idea behind this freedom of the land is that somehow some sort of universal human rights, which has some overlap with Common Law concepts.

And the fact is, most legal systems in the world are not Common Law anyway. There’s no connection to Christian thinking in most legal systems in the world. If, you know, anything about history, you know, that most states in history have been tyrannies of one sort or another. There’s no sort of universal system that’s going to come in as a rescue you, if the legal system in this country isn’t helping.

And I can see why people want it to be so, but it just isn’t! And people also often think that if they tell the police what’s going on, and they sort of confess a little fault, that that’s somehow going to get them off the hook. Whereas, in fact, of course, the police need every conviction they can get, because they’re not very good at getting convictions of real criminals. And so they’re normally quite keen to jump on anybody that’s overstepped the mark in such a way that they can claim a conviction.

So I think it really is important to do what you said and to get proper legal advice before plunging in. After all, it is an old saying, isn’t it:

“That fools rush in where angels fear to tread.”

Mark Collett: Agreed! Now, there’s another thing that I’ve been emailed about. And this is another one that I’ve been asked about. And it’s something to do with they call it “legal name fraud”. Now, it’s quite an interesting thing where there’s this I’m not going to call it a rumour, but it’s kind of a theory. Somebody’s come up with this idea that when you’re registered at birth that forms a corporation in your name. And that is somehow a fraud against you. And that you can essentially get out of lots of your different obligations by burning your birth certificate, and ordering a new one online from certain people who produce birth certificates that are not registered with the government. Is there any truth in this? Is destroying your birth certificate a magic golden ticket that allows you to not pay tax, walk on water, and never answer to the court?

Robin Tilbrook: You’ve answered your question there, Mark! [chuckling] No, of course not! But no doubt it is of some financial interest to those that produce such certificates, who I think charge for them. Somebody who does that is heading towards more and more difficulties with the legal system.

And I’m afraid one of the things that we saw quite a bit of in the whole lockdown situation was people refusing to give their name and address when the police asked them for it. Thinking that by not giving their name and address, they were refusing “joinder”, I think was the cry, or not consenting to be involved in the legal system.

The police carry truncheons because they know that not everybody is going to knuckle down to the legal system. And the power of the state does in the end rests at least partly on force. And so it’s not about totally whether you agree you’re going to be involved. You are in the State. The State is going to enforce it’s will upon you.

If you refuse to give your name and address, the particular way which the state’s going to enforce it’s will on you is the police officer is going to then have power under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act to arrest you! So you may have been committing originally a parking offence, or something very minor, that wouldn’t allow the police to arrest you. But if, for instance, you haven’t got any number plates on your car, and you’re committing a parking offence, they are entitled to ask you for your name and address. And if you refuse, or they think that the name address you’ve given is false, they’re entitled to arrest you! And very likely they will. So you’ve got yourself arrested simply by refusing to cooperate as required.

Mark Collett: Thank you. Now, we do have some paid questions. I’m going to ask them now.

Cheesy Watson gave £50. Thank you so much, my friend. That’s very, very generous of you, he says:

“Has Robin dealt with many positive discrimination cases? I noticed that state employers explicitly exclude White British people from professional programs and courses, and then call it positive action. Also, does Robin think the 2010 Equality Act should be abolished or reformed!”

Now this is something we’ve spoken about privately in terms of positive discrimination cases. So please do give your thoughts on those first, and then we’ll move on to the second part of the question in a second.

Robin Tilbrook: OK, yes. So “positive discrimination”, so-called, is actually obviously discrimination. And your listener is certainly right that that’s used often to advantage non-indigenous people and non-mainstream people. And the snag is, of course, that we very rarely have people come forward saying they want to challenge that.

But there was actually quite a good case, I think does illustrate the point, rather than easily, where I think Cheshire Police had such a provision in force about recruitment of new constables, or central constables. And there’s an English applicant who did better than everybody else on all the tests that he was put through. Part of the selection process. But he still wasn’t offered the job at the end of it. And so he, full marks to him, he challenged Cheshire Police, and he beat them! And they were shown to racially discriminated against him as a White, heterosexual, English man. But of course, most people don’t take the organizations on, and so they get away with it.

I would urge anybody who sees such an advert, who thinks that they might qualify apart from the ethnic, or religious, or whatever it is characteristic that has been promoted, to apply. And the traditional Leftist method of doing so, is they apply in two names. One their actual name. And the other in a name that seems to suggest that they are a member of whatever group it is that’s being promoted. And if they get an interview with one, but not the other, they’ve then got a pretty strong case for bringing a discrimination claim.

[62:11]

Mark Collett: Well, I’ve got an interesting thing that I’m going to mention to you. I was recently contacted by an old friend of mine and I’m not going to give her real name, but she had applied for a number of jobs with a CV in her real name and we’re going to call her Anne Jones. That will work.

And basically, she then put in a CV in the name Anne Yang, with an oriental sounding name. And basically she started getting callbacks immediately from places that had rejected her when she used her own name. And is there cases like that? So, say, when the BBC or the government, or the police or an organization like that actually specifically advertises for in a way that discriminates against, say, the indigenous English people, the indigenous Scots, indigenous Welsh. If you were then indigenous and you did apply for that job and got turned down, would you, and you could prove you were turned down because of your ethnicity, you could then take legal action, couldn’t you?

Robin Tilbrook: Yes! Obviously, the Cheshire Contemporary case, I’ve just been talking about that’s exactly that, really. He’d gone through more of the process and it was unarguable that he was the best candidate, and yet they wouldn’t appoint him. In the case where somebody gets approached in the Anne Yang name, but doesn’t get approached when they’re Anne Jones, it’s discrimination.

And I think it’s worth saying that even for a basic discrimination, where there’s no insult, or anything like that, the award can be up to about nine and a half thousand pounds. So there used to be quite a number of “culture warriors” who went around and made quite a lot of money out of doing that. And you still could. But obviously the culture warriors won’t make any money. They’ll be the ones that are immediately appointed [chuckling] now, whereas 30, 40 years ago they were ones who were saying that they were being discriminated against. But the boot is very much on the other foot now.

So I would say Anne Jones would be in with a good chance of a good payout. But it is worth bearing in mind that the case has to be brought within three months. She leaves it, she can’t bring a case in the employment tribunal. And that is the safest place to bring such a case. If you bring a case in the employment tribunal, you’re very unlikely to be ordered to pay any costs. It’s really quite easy access to it. And the employers are going to know that it’s going to cost them a lot of money. They could wind up with a finding of discrimination against them and that’s going to be a serious problem when they come to try and deal with the State, or advance their careers. Because there is a rule that if you are found to have discriminated, then the State is closed off to you from a promotion point of view.

We did actually have a case with the Workers of England Union, where somebody was found to be an English nationalist and he was marched off site straight away, and this was one of these development agencies. So what we did was we put the name of the chief executive who’ve been involved in this decision on the charge sheet, as it were, on the ET1, and we also had the name, obviously, of the organization. There was then a judicial mediation which made it clear that they were going to lose. And the person in question got to pay out of £25,000.

Mark Collett: This is what people need to hear. Basically, we are the underdogs in many ways, but that doesn’t mean we can’t fight back. And it certainly doesn’t mean there’s no way for us to win. And I think one of the important things you should take away from this stream is Robin is here arming you with ways that you can win. And the Workers of England Union, if we’re going to go with the military analogy, has all the best armaments. You’re not just going on to the battlefield alone, fighting alone. If you’re joining the Workers of England Union, you’ve got your own tank division backing you up. That’s what we’re saying.

And the second part of the question is:

“Do you think the 2010 Equality Act should be abolished, or reformed?”

Robin Tilbrook: Well, I think the first point is, as far as Workers of England Union are concerned, we are working within the current legal system, which includes the Equality Act. The Equality Act does give us some tools that we can work with, as I’ve been saying about bringing cases based on discrimination on the grounds of philosophical belief. We are making a success of bringing those type of cases. So I’m obviously slightly reluctant to Chuck out the Equality Act if everything else remains the same.

If you were talking about an overall reform that balanced the legal rights much more effectively than we’ve currently got, well, then I could see that you might not need the Equality Act. But if you just checked out the Equality Act and left everything else in place, all that’s going to do is prevent us from challenging organizations for discriminating on the grounds of philosophical belief.

Mark Collett: Excellent. So basically, in a nutshell, because I don’t want any editing this out and miss sort of representing what we’re saying, in an ideal world, all this equality nonsense would be basically done away with. But we don’t live in an ideal world. So throwing out the one thing that does give sort of White traditionalists or nationalists legal protection would actually be a detriment to us in terms of fighting back within the current overall legal framework.

Robin Tilbrook: Yeah, I mean, give me another slightly different sort of point. I remember when we, the English Democrats were talking about standing in the EU elections. We were in favour of coming out of the EU. And we had people trying to say to us that because we wanted to come out of the EU, we shouldn’t stand any EU elections. And the same argument had apparently been run by various people within UKIP. I’d dare say it was also run by various people within the BNP, probably, for all I know.

But of course, what they’re basically saying is that because the other side have got a good weapon and we don’t agree with that weapon, we shouldn’t use it. Well, that’s more or less the same as saying we ought to surrender right away, rather than actually fight in a way that’s effective.

Because court cases aren’t just about the argument, they’re also about the process. And the same is true of war generally. War isn’t about the argument. The argument comes into it. You couldn’t completely knock it out, but it’s mainly about resources and organization and focusing on what’s needed in order to win. And the same must be true of court cases. And the same is also true, I think, of any political orientation campaign.

Mark Collett: Thank you. Aunt Sally gave £3. Thanks so much, Aunt Sally. I hope you got your book in the post. And it says:

“I’m sure I heard you say on Patriotic Week review that it was your mother’s funeral today. I really do appreciate the sacrifices you make for our people. Thank you, Mark and Robin.”

It was actually yesterday, Aunt Sally. It’s Thursday when I usually record my weekly video, so obviously I was at my mom’s funeral yesterday. And it passed off just as I’d hoped it would. But things got remarkably grimmer when I got home, and was awoken at two in the morning to scrape my daughter sick off the carpet. So if I’m looking a little tired today, it’s because Sofia did her best impression of Reagan from The Exorcist. And as our heads spun round, the vomit cascaded everywhere! So we’ve had four rather large bouts of throwing up. It’s quite good because she was regular 02:00, 04:00, 06:00, and 08:00! So it was in two hourly bursts! But we are through that. Hopefully when this streams over she’ll be tucked up in bed, and I won’t be scraping last night’s tea off the carpet!

Robin Tilbrook: [words unclear] for as long as possible?

Mark Collett: Yeah, I’m not taking part in any bedtime procedures. Robin’s here with us tonight till 11:00 p.m. And just dropping that bomb shell. [chuckling] Hopefully she’ll be worn out by then. But thank you for their kind wishes Aunt Sally.

Max Anderson gave £3. Thank you so much. He said:

“What about agency zero based contracts, locum workers, versus full-time-time employment? Will you have less of a leg to stand on being a locum zero based contract, etc, on terms of political discrimination?”

So what about these people on these zero hour contracts, et cetera? Can you represent them and help them?

Robin Tilbrook: Obviously, the first precondition is that they are actually members. But assuming that they’re members, yes, of course! They are employees. And if they’re being discriminated against, they’re entitled to bring an employment tribunal case about it. That’s all there is to be said, really, about whether you can bring in a discrimination case.

The more difficult case for somebody who’s on zero hours, is actually an unfair dismissal case. But in order to qualify for that, at the moment, you have to have done, two years continuous employment. So that might be an issue. But certainly if we were talking political views and zero hour contracts, we could do something about it.

[63:51]

Mark Collett: And I just want to point out, because I’ve assisted in a case like this. You get more employment after two years. And essentially you get very few before two years. But discrimination is an exception to that.

Robin Tilbrook: Yep.

Mark Collett: So, for example, if you’re a normal guy and they sack you at work because you had an argument with somebody and they took the wrong side, and you feel it was unfair, you only get protection for that after two years. But if somebody gets rid of you after three months because you’re White and they turn around and say:

“Look here, white guy, we don’t want your type around here. Viva the Coloured Revolution!”

Or something like that. Even if you’ve only been there three months, you get all the protections, because that’s a discrimination case.

Robin Tilbrook: Sorry, just referring back again to the Redfern case. Because Redfern hadn’t done, two years. So he couldn’t apply for unfair dismissal at the time. And at the time there wasn’t any right to claim discrimination on the grounds of philosophical belief. And philosophical belief has been interpreted quite widely. So it does include political viewpoints. He would have been able to claim it. He would have been able to claim protection against discrimination and get compensation award, because he was a White race nationalist, he would have been able to claim that.

But because at the time there wasn’t the Equality Act, they didn’t have the provision about the system of philosophical belief, he couldn’t claim that. And it was that the European Court said was wrong. And it’s also that why is the reason why there is now that protection. Actually it’s a good example, isn’t it? Of the importance of fighting! Because in the end, he’s established an important point.

Mark Collett: Thank you so much. Winston Fuji Moore, he gave $10. Thank you so much, Winston. He said:

“Mark, fix your Joe Biden tier internet, lol!”

I actually take exception to that. So I’ve done a sneaky speed test during this stream, I have a download speed of 148.66 megabytes, and an upload speed of 29.52, with a ping of eleven milliseconds! I can assure you, if anything is at fault, it’s not my connection! But he asked the question and this is yeah, he did also ask an important question. He asked a number of questions, actually. He said he looked up Robin:

“Does he think the UK itself could have a confederal form of government like Switzerland, and break away from international groups like the World Trade Organization, and the UN, etc. And would that solve the problem. Or is English independence the only solution?”

Robin Tilbrook: Well, the fundamental issue about English and the reason why we support English independence is because what the British political establishment want to do, is they want to break England up. So we’ve actually got, in my view, a quite straightforward binary choice. Are we happy to see England broken up, or the UK? And of course, the English, quietly and without protest, pay to bankroll Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. We don’t get any credit for that. We get very much the bill and the blame.

But we’re probably nowhere near the point where it will be the English that break up the union. It looks like that the Scots again have beat everybody to the mark on that one. And bringing up second place at the moment seems to be Sinn Fein and the Irish nationalists in Ireland.

Mark Collett: Thank you. Winston also asks:

“Does Robin think that hearts and minds can be won against immigration to Britain by emphasizing the negative economic impact towards workers and regular folk. If so, how would politicians listen?”

Robin Tilbrook: Well, obviously [chuckling] I’m being asked questions about the English Democrats here, rather than my capacity with a hat on as a Workers of England Union person. But I think the answer to that question is that hearts of minds are already pretty firmly on the side of us having far too much immigration into this country, and much more needs to be done in order to prevent illegal immigration, deport illegal immigrants, and restrict the numbers coming in.

But that’s not really the key issue in what we have in the way of our political system in the UK, where the establishment parties, and governing entities, including the bureaucracy, are fully wed to the idea that they’re going to carry on having mass immigration, whatever we want!

And I think you can’t really do better than to point out that Boris Johnson was elected on a ticket which included clamping down on mass immigration and controlling it. “Controlling our borders” was the cry! And what did you do last year? He went off and organized his government to let in, to grant visas, 1.1 million visas, last year alone! And 1.1 million is more than the population of Greater Manchester, I think.

So, in effect, they’ve let in a new Greater Manchester.

And it’s probably more than that, because, for instance, the figures, the way they expressed it was you need to think about it quite carefully. Because they didn’t just say they’re letting 1.1 million people. What they said was they’d granted 1.1 million Visa applications. Well, family of eight. That’s probably one Visa application, isn’t it?

Mark Collett: Indeed. Thank you very much. And Winston also gave another $10. Thank you so much. And he said:

“US employers are given tax breaks for hiring illegal immigrants, and Visa holders who themselves don’t have to pay as higher tax as native citizens. There are also other benefits from the government for immigrants. Does the UK government do things to promote immigrant hiring, apart from just bringing them here?”

Robin Tilbrook: Yeah, I don’t think they do anything specific like that, but they certainly, … One of the things that Boris Johnson did was he took away the requirement for an employer to look into whether or not they could employ people in England before advertising for people to apply for visas to come here from somewhere abroad. So he, in effect, green lighted employers picking the cheapest employees to come from wherever they wanted them to come from.

So our political system and our political establishment groups, they’ve got different ways of doing it, but it’s probably amounts to more or less the same thing. They are trying to encourage mass immigration!

Mark Collett: Thank you so much. Saint Harrison said:

“Do you have to unlock your phone if the police turn up at your home?”

Robin Tilbrook: Well, if they demand that you unlock your phone and give them the codes, they will tell you that if you don’t do so, they can arrest you under the Terrorism Act, of all things. So the answer to that question is yes, in effect. But you have to be asked in the right way. And they have to offer the right threats before you would do that.

And I think it’s also an interesting example of how the British political establishment have been basically trying to make it easier to convict people for the last 30, 40 years. A lot of the protections that used to be in the legal system have been removed. And you wouldn’t use to have to provide access to things in that kind of way. Obviously we didn’t have mobile phones 40 years ago, but if you could think of something that would have been equivalent, you wouldn’t have had to have provided access to it. And they certainly wouldn’t have gone around claiming there was something to do with terrorism, which is obviously ridiculous!

[84:00]

Mark Collett: Thank you so much. Nativist Warning said:

“Can an employer have a policy that if someone’s political activities slash beliefs contradict their ethos slash standards, that is ground for dismissal?”

Robin Tilbrook: But I’m not quite sure. Is he asking whether employers do that, or is he asking whether there is anything that we could do about it?

Mark Collett: He’s asking, is that legal, effectively? So if an employer said:

“You have to hold these certain beliefs to work here, and if you hold beliefs, or get involved in activities that the company feels contradict their beliefs, or core values, would the company be entitled to dismiss you for that?”

Robin Tilbrook: Okay, so this very much depends on what the circumstances are. So, for instance, the Catholic Church. If your employer was the Catholic Church, obviously the Catholic Church might well be able to say that you got to be a Catholic. If you were working in something that was religiously sensitive.

You might be amused to know that the Church of England has now got to the point where people that work in the diocesan offices of the various Bishops, many of them are no longer Christians, let alone Anglicans. But that’s the way that the Church of England’s gone.

If you were working for, say, the Labour Party, perish the thought, but if you were, they could obviously insist upon you being a Labour supporter.

But for most businesses, there’s no legitimate reason for insisting on political conformity. And when they try and do so, the only reason they get away with it is that the people that are being subject to this are not taking proper advice, and not got the proper support.

Mark Collett: Thank you. I’m Just Talking Serious said:

“If Patriotic Alternative became a registered political party, would that gain those associated with it extra legal protection?”

Robin Tilbrook: Actually, no. Because it’s the system of philosophical belief that’s protected, not the membership of any particular organization. So your argument, if challenged, isn’t:

“I’m a member of so and so.”

Your argument is:

“I believe in this system of philosophical belief and you’re discriminating against that.”

Mark Collett: Thank you. Popcorn Power said:

“Is there a comparable organization to the Workers of England in Ireland?”

Robin Tilbrook: I don’t believe there is. We did have contact with some Irish activists who were saying they needed something like the Workers of England. I don’t actually know what the regulatory system is for trade unions in Ireland. But there would be some sort of regulatory system.

In England we have to register with the Certification Office. And Workers of England Union is registered with the Certification Office as a trade union. And furthermore, we’ve also got our certificate as an independent trade union, which means we’ve got all the regulatory boxes ticked that we can do.

And there’ll be something similar in Ireland, I suspect. And people that want to organize such an equivalent organization, I just think they could do it. It’s just a question of the time and effort involved.

Mark Collett: Thank you so much. And Popcorn Power also said, and this is a really interesting question, actually, I think I can answer this one, but I’m going to let you answer it because I might get it wrong. But I think I do know the answer to this. He says:

“Have any of the companies told you that you cannot represent someone they employ because they already belong to a different union that covers that company, and has negotiated for them?”

I think what he’s asking is, can a company say:

“Well, look, you can’t come in and help because you have to be a member of a specific union to work at this company?”

I think that’s actually illegal. I think Margaret Thatcher outlawed closed shops. Is that correct?

Robin Tilbrook: I think she did. I also think the European Court of Human Rights again, has said that closed shops are not allowed, because there has to be freedom of association. And there is also a specific law in the jurisdiction of England and Wales, I think, also in Scotland, and maybe in Northern Ireland, which says that basically:

“You can be represented in a disciplinary or grievance procedure, either by a workplace colleague, or by a union rep of your choice.”

So it isn’t actually the right of the union to come in. It is the right of the person who’s got the problem with the employer to choose who comes in.

And if they choose a Workers of England Union rep, the employer has no right to resist that. Any decision to dismiss will be automatically unfair if that occurs. And so there are some teeth to that.

We had a quite amusing instance which I think demonstrates just how hopeless quite a lot of the HR human resources departments actually are. So we had a member who had difficulties with head office for Marks and Spencers. You might think Marks and Spencer would be an organization that would have a very efficient, knowledgeable, and proficient, HR department. But they reckon that they got a policy they wouldn’t allow any other unions other than those who had signed up to HR to be recognized. Sorry, Marks and Spencers, to be recognized.

And so obviously our rep pointed out that was wrong, read out the legislation and the person who was dealing with it was a full national board member. And they then rang the HR department who said that what they were saying was right. Again, he pointed out what the actual statute says. So she adjourned the hearing, went off and got legal advice. Of course, the legal advice was that we were right and their HR was wrong. She was absolutely livid about how incompetent their HR was! But the net result was we saved the members job.

But I suppose in a sense, what that shows is these things are as much about fighting, and arguing, about things and not giving up. Things don’t just sort of automatically fall into your lap. You’ve got to fight for it!

Mark Collett: Thank you. And Jonathan Hannah gave £10. Thank you so much. He said:

“Thank you very much for the stream, gentlemen. There are very many ethnos in Ireland, north and south. We see our country being destroyed by these parasites!”

Well, thank you for that observation.

Well, that is the end of the questions and obviously we’ve had a few technical struggles this evening, which is very, very unfortunate. Now, before we close things down, I’m going to say thank you to Robin, but also remind people that Robin did an entire two hour stream with me and Laura some time ago, on how to actually deal with the police. And he also helped with the preparation of our document “Don’t Say a Thing. How to Deal with the Police”, which can be downloaded from the Patriotic Alternative website.

So, Robin, I’m going to give you the last word, if you’d like to give yourself a little bit of an outro and one last plug for the Workers of England Union. I’ll also tell you that the link to Workers of England Union is in the description of this stream, and on all the replays. So you will be able to find the Workers of England Union there.

And I do recommend, please do go and join them. It’s a small amount of money per month, but if you are in a job that you think may, if you’re working for a company and you think you may end up in a sticky situation, these guys really are the best.

Robin, I’ll give you the final word before I close things down.

Robin Tilbrook: Well, I’m certainly going to agree that we’re the best! Thank you for saying so, [chuckling] Mark. We are, I think, not only the best, but we’re the only ones who are actually trying to fight for our members rights. And obviously, it is, in effect, an insurance policy to be a member of a trade union. You want to make sure that the insurance that you’re signing up to actually covers you for what’s likely to happen to you.

Whereas if you sign up for one of the so-called mainstream, TUC supporting trade unions, what you’re signing up for is giving money and resources and help to Labour. If that’s what you want to do, that’s fair enough. But if you actually want a union that is going to support you, then you need to join the Workers of England Union. And I would hope that you do so.

Could I just break off slightly, Mark, and ask if you did have the advert that we’ve had broadcast on GB News recently?

Mark Collett: I don’t, but I could pull it up as an outro, if you wish. Whereabouts can I find that?

Robin Tilbrook: I have sent it to you. Whether it’s easy to find or not, I’m not sure.

Mark Collett: I’m sure I can find it.

Robin Tilbrook: Let me see if I can get hold of it.

Mark Collett: Oh dear! I’m rapidly scanning my emails like the ill prepared buffoon, that I am. But no, I have found it. I have found it. Give me two seconds. I just got to save it to my desktop and then we will play out with that.

But before we do play out with that, I am going to say the following. Thank you to Robin, thank you to everyone who’s watched, thank you to everyone who donated so generously. And remember, we will be back on Sunday night for our film review of Dogville. It’s actually a very interesting film. It’s 3 hours long, it’s a bit of a monster! But it is a really, really interesting film. Definitely a lot to discuss there. And obviously we will also be back next week. PWR will feature Eric Striker and Monday will be Tea Time with Sam and Laura.

So I just like to say a huge thank you to Robin again. And we are going to play out tonight with the advert for Workers of England Union.

Thank you, everybody. I have really enjoyed this dream, despite the unfortunate technical errors. But remember, if you couldn’t watch it on Odyssey, you will be able to watch it on replay. Thank you. Good night and enjoy this advert.

GN News guest (male): The Covid Only Service, was that it was not Covid itself, but it was the policy responses. The fact that people with cancer, heart disease, stroke, we saw a lot of them go from stage one to stage four. We saw all different sorts of things from acute diabetes, even dentist issues. And what that meant was a huge backlog now, 7 million people waiting to get treatment on the NHS. We also saw that the vaccine mandate that was threatened to the NHS staff, which, by the way, where were the unions representing the NHS workers then?

There was only one, as it happened, the Workers of England Union. But that also put enormous pressure because we know that care workers were lost. So over 40,000 care workers were lost, which now we’ve got a situation where staff are under even more pressure on the front line because there’s people in beds that could be released that can’t go there.

I think we need to stop treating the NHS like a holy grail, like a deity. It was a remarkable contribution at the end of the Second World War. But it’s there to serve us. And I think I really concur with some of the things Renny was saying. I think it was Dr. David Wrigley that was saying that we’ve actually had a lot of investment going, but you get a lot of higher level management and bureaucrats doubling in size, and doubling in fees. Yet frontline staff at the coalface are not receiving that.

This is about organization and logistics. It’s about execution. I happen to think that everyone in Britain should get paid more. I think we can have wealth creation for all. I’m not in that whole dichotomy of either you get this or we get this taken away, but we have to have a rational way of engaging it. And not say:

“This is a diety and you can’t touch it!”

We see lots of issues going on with bureaucratic management. We’ve seen consistent policies that have had an impact. And I believe in the right for people to withdraw their labour. But actually what we’ve got to have is we’ve got to have an honest reckoning with this situation. We need to be able, the fact that the A&E services are so impacted because people aren’t seeing GPs. All of this needs to be approached from a macro level. And obviously the people on the front line, I think in Britain people have a normal, … [clip cut out]

[98:58]

[END]

============================================

Odysee Comments

216 Comments

(As of Nov 13, 2022)

@MarkCollett
1 day ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Log in to reply
2
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
They are teating us like slaves. We need a RISING
Log in to reply
4
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Why are names on BLOCK CAPITALS?
Log in to reply
2
0

@why
1 day ago
Ask him if he is pro-LGBT, because there’s a load of pro-LGBT stuff on their website
Log in to reply
2
0
Hide replies

@djh1697
9 hours ago
please provide a link?
Log in to reply
0
0

@phantom_reborn
1 day ago
any views
on this one….. can someone refuse mandatory EDI training at work on the basis that they have protected philosophical beliefs as nationalists?
Log in to reply
1
0
Hide replies

@FellowAethelweard
15 hours ago
You brough a very important concern and subject here that I belive Robin and his team should look and study into legally defeating it making one self lawfully immune to its demands.
Log in to reply
1
0
Hide replies

@phantom_reborn
15 hours ago
thanks for saying that. appreciated. Mandatory diversity training in the form of an online module started this year at my place of work. I’m annoyed with myself because I didn’t choose to resist. Loads of people must be in the same situation as me. It would be great if there were some standard piece of advice on the legal position, which we could all use. For example: a standard letter expressing non-compliance would be really useful.
Log in to reply
1
0
Hide replies

@FellowAethelweard
15 hours ago
After watching the video i am thinking of joining this union despite detesting unions since i saw the modern types are now.
Log in to reply
0
0

@hungowapower
1 day ago
Sometimes it looked like Mark was wearing a yarmulke
Thanks for the advice guys!
Log in to reply
1
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Nothing in Nature is equal.
Log in to reply
1
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
The System is so corrupt – but not with law, apparently?
Log in to reply
1
0

@ethno
1 day ago
odysee is bankrupt from LBC
Log in to reply
1
0

@djh1697
9 hours ago
An independent union that is nothing to do with your employer is a massive bonus. The rep will challenge company policies, and use other arguments when representing you. I was in an independent union, which saved me from getting the sack. The retailer argued that the union could not come to the meetings, prior to the law was changed, but gave me valuable advice.
Log in to reply
0
0

@FellowAethelweard
15 hours ago
Robin what would be your legal advice for self defence law tactics against home invasion so that you as the home resident do not get prosecuted by the same hand in the law?
Log in to reply
0
0

@Red97
17 hours ago
Outstanding.
Log in to reply
0
0

@r.madden
1 day ago

@Aunt-Sally
Hello to you Glad you are still around.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
The official Patriotic Alternative website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk
Join us at Patriotic Alternative:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/play-your-part

https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/donations
– PA needs financial support to get us onto the next level.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@Aunt-Sally
oh my, thanks for the head’s up
Log in to reply
0
0

@Aunt-Sally
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson
It’s usually porn bots that I see but not on Mark’s streams lately
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
spamming “Shush” is no real drama. They weren’t organised or saying anything illegal or attack people.
Log in to reply
0
0

@Aunt-Sally
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson
I was trying to delete them on DLive but you got them quicker than I could
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@Aunt-Sally
Oh well, we managed it. That’s the most important thing. The show must go on.
Log in to reply
0
0

@Aunt-Sally
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson
I’ve never known it that bad tbh
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
no
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
Have you see those spam attacks before?
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
HOW TO DEAL WITH THE POLICE – With Robin Tilbrook & Laura Towler

Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Speeches from the recent PA Northern Conference
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/patv
Log in to reply
0
0

@Ir0nW1LL
1 day ago
That bugle is suspect?
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Fair play to GB News
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Mark Collett
Telegram
https://t.me/markacollett
BitChute
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/IYXqC1BYZH31/
Gab
https://gab.com/markcollett
The Fall of Western Man
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Tea Time with Sam and Laura
Odysee

@LauraTowler
DLive
https://dlive.tv/LauraTowler
Log in to reply
0
0

@Wrecked
1 day ago
striker will be a great guest
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
STRIKER!!!!!!!!!!!
Log in to reply
0
0

@Wrecked
1 day ago
oh dear. lol
Log in to reply
0
0

@Wrecked
1 day ago
I say don’t talk to cops… but I have talked my way out of a few tickets.
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Hail the workers! Join up
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Robin Tilbrook
Twitter:
Tweets by RobinTilbrook
Blog:
http://robintilbrook.blogspot.com/
Workers of England Union website:

Why the W.E.U is the Union for you?

Log in to reply
0
0

@CrankyCracker2
1 day ago
Thanks Robin. Have a good day buddy \o
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson
No drama. Nothing illegal. Show’s over anyway
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
HOW TO DEAL WITH THE POLICE – With Robin Tilbrook & Laura Towler

Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
it sort of ruins the chat a bit, oh well
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Only bots saying “shush” no drama
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
too late now. The vid will be removed after the show
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
Look at DLive right away, we’re getting Bot spammed
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
^^
Log in to reply
0
0

@Ir0nW1LL
1 day ago
The time is way over due, that we stop living this lie
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Workers of England Union website:

Why the W.E.U is the Union for you?

Log in to reply
0
0

@RhythmAndSound
1 day ago
Canada as well give tax breaks to companies that import workers.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Log in to reply
0
0

@TheTrUKShow
1 day ago
the question was could they then fire you because you’re not in line with this
Log in to reply
0
0

@TheTrUKShow
1 day ago
most grad jobs say they value diversity and inclusion at the very first step
Log in to reply
0
0

@TheTrUKShow
1 day ago
not true
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago

@Vivec
Objectively, it’s the other way around. The UK is under Common Law; Europe is under Napoleonic law where man his to prove his innocence .
Log in to reply
0
0

@Vivec
1 day ago
Innocent until proven guilty, in the UK its guilty until proven otherwise it seems.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
UK Terrorism Acts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_Acts
Log in to reply
0
0

@Wrecked
1 day ago
wow, BC is screwed up.
Log in to reply
0
0

@Vivec
1 day ago

@Ir0nW1LL
ideally yeah, the first step (even if it seems mild) would be imo to deport anyone who acts up (unruly or violently). Might seem a more palatable for normies to get on board.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Saint Harrison
Telegram
https://t.me/saintharrison
Odysee

@SaintHarrison
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Log in to reply
0
0

@Ir0nW1LL
1 day ago

@Vivec
, No mercy, they all have to go back!
Log in to reply
0
0

@Vivec
1 day ago
yeah fair enough wrecked
Log in to reply
0
0

@Wrecked
1 day ago
I say deport all poc’s
Log in to reply
0
0

@Vivec
1 day ago
Need to send a message to those who wish to immigrate, behave or get deported.
Log in to reply
0
0

@Vivec
1 day ago
Not only deport illegals but deport anyone who commits crimes.
Log in to reply
0
0

@Ir0nW1LL
1 day ago
)))they((( have tried to break us up for centuries
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
The official Patriotic Alternative website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk
Join us at Patriotic Alternative:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/play-your-part

https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/donations
– PA needs financial support to get us onto the next level.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Chairman Mark has spoken
Log in to reply
0
0

@ClaudeFermi
1 day ago
Rookie Numbers
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
boom
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Grandma Towler’s Cakes & Bakes is now available for pre-order!
https://www.claymorebooks.co.uk/product/grandma-towlers-cakes-and-bakes/
Log in to reply
0
0

@Ir0nW1LL
1 day ago
..skills
Log in to reply
0
0

@Ir0nW1LL
1 day ago
What does that say about mothers cooking?
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
“bursts” is definitely the right word for it lol
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
poor Mark, that’s rough
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Poor Mark
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Log in to reply
0
0

@Ir0nW1LL
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
, The Natural Order, is thier eternal enemy!
Log in to reply
0
0

@Ir0nW1LL
1 day ago
(((thier))) “equality act”
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Equality Act 2010
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equality_Act_2010
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
HAIL the workers!
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Robin Tilbrook
Twitter:
Tweets by RobinTilbrook
Blog:
http://robintilbrook.blogspot.com/
Workers of England Union website:

Why the W.E.U is the Union for you?

Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@ClaudeFermi
I don’t know how they could stand it. Perhaps they’ve seen the light.
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Anarchists must be having a wet dream at the demise of the West and the State.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ClaudeFermi
1 day ago
funny how Yang & Gabbard were the only Democrats that I liked & now they’re no longer Democrats.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@ClaudeFermi
Yes, Andrew Yang promised a $1000 bag every month. “Get the bag”
Log in to reply
0
0

@Ir0nW1LL
1 day ago
Race grifters
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago

@MarkCollett
Ask him about the validity and consequences of thousands employing the can’t pay, won’t pay. TY
Log in to reply
0
0

@ClaudeFermi
1 day ago
Yang Gang! $1,000/Month
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
^ haha
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
#YangGang
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Mark Collett
Telegram
https://t.me/markacollett
BitChute
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/IYXqC1BYZH31/
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon on the left side of this page for a like!
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
Ah, understood
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
legal**
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson
All legalc docs
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
Thanks for the helpful links
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Part 1 of the video I mentioned

Part 2

ZERO prosecution for council tax avoidance
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
Which names? Where?
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Log in to reply
0
0

@ClaudeFermi
1 day ago
Don’t talk to cops <–Good Wisdom
Log in to reply
0
0

@Wrecked
1 day ago
why is robin tilbrook all max headroom?
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
HOW TO DEAL WITH THE POLICE – With Robin Tilbrook & Laura Towler

Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
There was a video on Youtube of a court being filmed. The defence presented a birth certificate for the accused of non payment of Council Tax. The court was abandoned cos they couldn’t prosecute.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ClaudeFermi
1 day ago

@MarkCollett
Odysee decided to work all of a sudden. You have 2 entropy superchats.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Professor from Virginia, Don’t Talk to the Police video (for American law)

Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
No one talks, everyone walks. :thumbs_up:
Log in to reply
0
0

@Wrecked
1 day ago
Same as america. say nothing to them.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
HOW TO DEAL WITH THE POLICE – With Robin Tilbrook & Laura Towler

Log in to reply
0
0

@why
1 day ago

@DickMorrison
its fine on dlive
https://dlive.tv/LauraTowler
Log in to reply
0
0

@Echo_Harp
1 day ago
A true labor leader never takes a vacation!
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Robin Tilbrook
Twitter:
Tweets by RobinTilbrook
Blog:
http://robintilbrook.blogspot.com/
Workers of England Union website:

Why the W.E.U is the Union for you?

Log in to reply
0
0

@DickMorrison
1 day ago
Stream won’t load, more bandwidth! more bandwidth! Lol :thumbs_down:
Log in to reply
0
0

@why
1 day ago
no buffering at dlive
https://dlive.tv/LauraTowler
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
I hope the buffering isn’t a cohencidence
Log in to reply
0
0

@why
1 day ago
everyone get to dlive
https://dlive.tv/LauraTowler
Log in to reply
0
0

@Wrecked
1 day ago
Stream is working for me now.
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Help us to help YOU. Please consider giving PA the tools.
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/donation
:thumbs_up:
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
PA Wales on Telegram
https://t.me/PAWales
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
PA Northern Ireland
https://t.me/PatAltNorthernIreland
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
PA Scotland on Telegram
https://t.me/PatAltScotland
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
The official Patriotic Alternative website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
People need assistance when engaging the system.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Robin Tilbrook
Twitter:
Tweets by RobinTilbrook
Blog:
http://robintilbrook.blogspot.com/
Workers of England Union website:

Why the W.E.U is the Union for you?

Log in to reply
0
0

@CrankyCracker2
1 day ago
change settings to 480p. worked for me
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Redfearn v. The United Kingdom, Human rights victory for BNP bus driver

Human rights victory for BNP bus driver

Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Log in to reply
0
0

@why
1 day ago
dlive is fine tho
Log in to reply
0
0

@why
1 day ago
odysee buffering..
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
HR hens
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
The official Patriotic Alternative website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk
Join us at Patriotic Alternative:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/play-your-part

https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/donations
– PA needs financial support to get us onto the next level.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Speeches from the recent PA Northern Conference
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/patv
Log in to reply
0
0

@0KT0BER
1 day ago
indeed
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
If buffering, watch here but chat on Ody
https://dlive.tv/LauraTowler
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
“Who fights may lose, but who does not fight has lost already.” ~ Bertolt Brecht
Log in to reply
0
0

@0KT0BER
1 day ago
evening

@ReedJohnson
streams pooped here for me
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon on the left side of this page for a like!
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@0KT0BER
Good evening
Log in to reply
0
0

@0KT0BER
1 day ago
evening all
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
If buffering, watch here by chat on Ody
https://dlive.tv/LauraTowler
Log in to reply
0
0

@hoyle.alan
1 day ago
dont seem to be loading up
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Robin Tilbrook
Twitter:
Tweets by RobinTilbrook
Blog:
http://robintilbrook.blogspot.com/
Workers of England Union website:

Why the W.E.U is the Union for you?

Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@14Ways
You’re welcome
Log in to reply
0
0

@14Ways
1 day ago
thnaks
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@14Ways
If buffering, the stream is also on DLive
https://dlive.tv/LauraTowler
Log in to reply
0
0

@14Ways
1 day ago
Just got here, not working
Log in to reply
0
0

@MarkCollett
1 day ago

@thomas.zarebczan
Been working like a charm until tonight!
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
on and off
Log in to reply
0
0

@thomas.zarebczan
1 day ago
stream working for everyone recently?
Log in to reply
0
0

@Identitarian
1 day ago
uo
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Robin Tilbrook
Twitter:
Tweets by RobinTilbrook
Blog:
http://robintilbrook.blogspot.com/
Log in to reply
0
0

@tiswas
1 day ago
Unions have agreed to let temp workers , work while perms are on strike !!!! work it out !!
Log in to reply
0
0

@tiswas
1 day ago
Galloway !!!! are you sure ?
Log in to reply
0
0

@why
1 day ago
Ask Robin if anyone can set up a Union..
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Workers of England Union website:

Why the W.E.U is the Union for you?

Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Speeches from the recent PA Northern Conference
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/patv
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Unions need to defect from Labour and support Galloway
Log in to reply
0
0

@Charlie_Boy
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
thanks!
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
https://dlive.tv/LauraTowler
Log in to reply
0
0

@Identitarian
1 day ago
or going into apprenticeship
Log in to reply
0
0

@Identitarian
1 day ago
is it worth doing a levels
Log in to reply
0
0

@Charlie_Boy
1 day ago
stream not loading for me, anyone have any suggestions?
Log in to reply
0
0

@Identitarian
1 day ago
yo
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Workers of England Union website:

Why the W.E.U is the Union for you?

Log in to reply
0
0

@PopcornPower
1 day ago
Going to dlive. Odysee is just failing too much for me today.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
HOW TO DEAL WITH THE POLICE – With Robin Tilbrook & Laura Towler

Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Help us to help YOU :thumbs_up:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/donation
Log in to reply
0
0

@PopcornPower
1 day ago
Funny. A refresh on my browser solved the buffering issue.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If buffering, the stream is also on DLive
https://dlive.tv/LauraTowler
Log in to reply
0
0

@SchlomoZahnstein
1 day ago
Dont forget to like Freunde!
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Mark Collett
Telegram
https://t.me/markacollett
BitChute
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/IYXqC1BYZH31/
Gab
https://gab.com/markcollett
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Fine here
Log in to reply
0
0

@VicTomised
1 day ago
not playing for me either.
Log in to reply
0
0

@SchlomoZahnstein
1 day ago
Whats poppin homies :surprised:
Log in to reply
0
0

@Hullensian
1 day ago
Doesn’t work for me even after refreshing.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Robin Tilbrook
Twitter:
Tweets by RobinTilbrook
Blog:
http://robintilbrook.blogspot.com/
Workers of England Union website:

Why the W.E.U is the Union for you?

Log in to reply
0
0

@NativistWarning
1 day ago
Refresh and it will work
Log in to reply
0
0

@ethno
1 day ago
buffering, stream isn’t loading
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon on the left side of this page for a like!
Log in to reply
0
0

@tiswas
1 day ago
53 people watching ?? a real army !
Log in to reply
0
0

@Aunt-Sally
1 day ago
Its buffering for me so I’m off to DLive
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If buffering, the stream is also on DLive
https://dlive.tv/LauraTowler
Log in to reply
0
0

@wayha388
1 day ago

@tiswas
Everything must be studies and discussed if we want to avoid defeats and set back.
Log in to reply
0
0

@Rich
1 day ago
buffering
Log in to reply
0
0

@NativistWarning
1 day ago
Free man of the land, I remember watching a video of a guy saying he was one, never paid tax apparently!
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Nail McCrae from the Workers of England Union was recently on with Galloway. Great to see the false Left/Right dichotomy being smashed

Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Email Mark Collett mark@thefallofwesternman.com
Log in to reply
0
0

@streakybacon
1 day ago
buffering bad for me but Dlive is fine
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Donate via Odysee or send a paid question or comment:
BROWSER: type your question before sending, then click either the “$” icon for a cash donation, or the coloured icon to send a LBRY token.
MOBILE APP: select the “Wallet” icon at the bottom of the opening screen.
Log in to reply
0
0

@PopcornPower
1 day ago
What car? This is my sailing yacht!
Log in to reply
0
0

@tiswas
1 day ago
im still waiting for an apology from the english !!!
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Log in to reply
0
0

@PopcornPower
1 day ago
I am a freeman of the land….
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Workers of England Union website:

Why the W.E.U is the Union for you?

Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Robin Tilbrook
Twitter:
Tweets by RobinTilbrook
Blog:
http://robintilbrook.blogspot.com/
Log in to reply
0
0

@tiswas
1 day ago
oh dear
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Radio Albion:
https://www.radioalbion.com/2020/12/players.html
Log in to reply
0
0

@NativistWarning
1 day ago
Good evening
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Hurts you by your response
Log in to reply
0
0

@tiswas
1 day ago
truth hurts dont it poochy boy
Log in to reply
0
0

@tiswas
1 day ago
why not
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Why bother then?
Log in to reply
0
0

@tiswas
1 day ago
but changed nothing
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
^he says by talking
Log in to reply
0
0

@tiswas
1 day ago
talk will change nothing !!!!!
Log in to reply
0
0

@Aunt-Sally
1 day ago
Hi folks
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon on the left side of this page for a like!
Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Nail McCrae from the Workers of England Union was recently on with Galloway. Great to see the false Left/Right dichotomy being smashed

Log in to reply
0
0

@BeerHallPooch
1 day ago
Hail the workers.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
The official Patriotic Alternative website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk
Join us at Patriotic Alternative:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/play-your-part

https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/donations
– PA needs financial support to get us onto the next level.
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Good evening patriots
Log in to reply
0
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Log in to reply
0
0
============================================

See Also

top

Mark Collett – The Queen Doesn’t give a SH*T About You – Jan 7, 2022 — Transcript

History Debunked – Is Multiculturalism Predominantly a Jewish Enterprise? – Feb 21, 2022 – Transcript

Woes: Hello. And welcome back to Millenniyule 2021. This is the second night. And there are going to be four streams tonight. Let me see. In two hours it will be Survive the Jive, and then Mark Gullick, and then Charles Robertson.

But first it’s UK Column. Now, I have three representatives from the UK Column here. This is Brian Garrish, David Scott, and Alex Thompson. Now I last had UK Column on in 2017. There have been various reasons why they haven’t been on since. But I wanted to have them on since then. But unfortunately it just wasn’t possible for various reasons.

But I’m a big fan of UK Column. I’ll introduce you this way. A lot of people might have once thought UK Column is a conspiracy based thing. It goes into that sort of territory.

And a lot of people have been skeptical of that whole area until the last maybe five years, and then especially the last two years. I think a lot of people are now much more amenable to the notion of things being orchestrated behind the scenes. And sometimes openly, shamelessly, than they once were.

So we’re going to talk about the last two years.

So welcome UK Column! Thank you for agreeing to appear.

David Scott: Thank you.

Woes: Yeah that’s Alex there. That’s Brian and David.

David Scott: It’s lovely to be here. It’s been a while since 2017.

Woes: Yes.

David Scott: In 2017 we’re sitting in, I think Brian Garrish’s kitchen, the three of us!

Brian Garrish: Yes.

David Scott: Squeezed in quite narrowly. And we were talking about how dire 2017 had been compared to 2016, which was an absolute hoot!

Woes: Yes. Yeah, it’s strange, because in different years have different pluses and minuses. And 2016 had been a hoot. But 2017 was a big year for dissidence. It was a very good year for that kind of thing. But the world was clearly getting darker. I mean, Trump had got elected, and the Syria stuff had started. Which had immediately ended the honeymoon period for Trump.

But anyway, I would like to ask you, … I mean, clearly the world has transformed since then. It feels like a different age. When I think about 2017, I was doing very well on YouTube. Since then everything has darkened [chuckling] in terms of the online world! The online world, social media, has become a system for control, rather than a system for freedom of speech.

So would any of you like to talk about that.

Brian Garrish: Well, if I may, I’ll respond to that straight away and say that if you’re still on YouTube you’re doing well. Because, of course, the UK Column was banned from YouTube a few months ago.

Woes: And I was banned in February [chuckling]

Brian Garrish: Okay. Well you beat us to it. Then well done! But perhaps I’m allowed to just add. And if your viewers and listeners would like to know why we were banned, it’s, because we put up a audio testimony of a lady whose husband had suffered from neurological damage after having the vaccine. Guillain-Barre syndrome. And he’d ultimately been paralyzed from the neck down. So we just simply broadcast her testimony. Which was very quiet, very measured, but very emotional. And that produced us a ban on YouTube. And then I think it was sees.

David Scott: A little wrinkle to that story, actually, was we didn’t get immediately banned. The video was up, the offended video was up for about three weeks. It was then picked up by Conservative Woman, who we suspect is read by Tory Central Office. They did a transcript of the piece and linked to our video. Then we got banned.

Brian Garrish: Then we got banned. And then a few weeks later the Daily Mail ran exactly the same story. And the key the key part of the story was that when this unfortunate gentleman suffered the vaccine adverse reactions, he went on to a ward where the doctors diagnosed it as a adverse vaccine reaction. It was diagnosed as Guillain-Barre syndrome. And there were at least six other men on the ward all with similar neurological damage. When the Daily Mail printed the story it was acceptable, but the UK Column having broadcast that story months, well month and a bit, weeks earlier, we were banned.

Alex Thompson: There was a time Brian when we were actually, I think a year and a half ahead of The Daily Telegraph on one of the Covid stories. I forget which one.

[05:10]

Brian Garrish: Yes. Well there’s been a number.

David Scott: That was Sage. And the Sage minutes that described how they were going to increase people’s sense of personal risk in order to control their behaviour. I think that was it.

Brian Garrish: Yeah.

Alex Thompson: And at that point, of course, The Daily Telegraph had to come out with it, because Laura Dodsworth had written a whole book on this theme, State of Fear. In which she never gives attribution to UK Column. But I think clearly she’d read us quite thoroughly, because she was in every UK Column talking point in that book.

Woes: This is quite remarkable that you could get punished. How many subscribers did the YouTube channel have?

Alex Thompson: We were just shy of a hundred grand so we didn’t quite get our silver album! I think perhaps they were minded not to give us that.

Woes: Yeah. I think a lot of people get frozen at about 90, 95, 96, 98, and mysteriously never make it to one hundred thousand! That’s happened to a lot of people, that I remember. Yeah, that’s a big loss. I’m sorry for that. My own channel I think had 57,000, I think it was at the end. But what’s incredible about all of this is that there is no way to put it to YouTube that what they banned you for is something that, did you say the Daily Mail?

Brian Garrish: Daily Mail, yeah.

Woes: Daily Mail reported a few weeks later. There’s no way to reason with them and say:

“Can’t you see that you’ve done something irrational, and unfair?”

This is something that as a feature of this age is these massive, monolithic, corporations that you cannot reason with. I think that’s a big characteristic of this, I think.

David Scott: Like UK Column, we’ve also had run-ins with Twitter [Woes laughs]. I’m a Twitter refugee as well. I got banned from Twitter.

And the first strike I got, I was actually doing it in real time. Because I was on the UK Column news and Mike had organized, … There’s a database that the government put out, called the Yellow Card System, which reports on vaccine adverse reactions. And it was basically, if it was a pencil written ledger faxed to somebody, and then scanned, and then put up, it would have it wouldn’t have been any more crude! It was basically an Excel spreadsheet. And it was almost impossible to find anything!

So we got all the information out of this, and put a front end on. So you could search for things that you could understand. You could say, okay, headaches, or pains, or leg pain, or problems with eyes, or whatever it was.

Alex Thompson: It had manufacturers.

David Scott: Yeah!

Brian Garrish: Well should we just focus a bit on this. One thing I’d like to say is the other member of the team is Mike Robinson, who’s not here. And I’d like to give him a mention, because it was Mike Robinson and his team that actually built the database, the searchable database for the Yellow Card data.

But I think your audience would want to know that the official figures from the MHRA that’s the UK’s Medicines and Health Products Regulatory Agency. It collects data on vaccine adverse reactions. And the total to date is one million, fourteen thousand, six hundred and thirty nine [1,014,639] recorded adverse reactions. And total fatalities one thousand eight hundred and twenty two [1,822].

And those figures should be considered, bearing in mind that the MHRA was prepared to admit that probably less than 10 percent of adverse reactions got recorded. And probably down to about two to four percent of serious adverse effects. So that isn’t the UK Column’s data. That is the Government, the UK Government’s official data!

But the MHRA provided that data in a very clumsy system that was very difficult to search. And so Mike Robinson and the team built this amazing front end to allow people to search the government’s own data. But this is where we are, with vaccine adverse effects in UK.

[10:15]

David Scott: And so my Twitter ban, my first Twitter strike, suspension, came. Mike had created this website. It took nothing but the government’s own data and simply made it searchable. I thought that’s fantastic! And I tweeted it out, whilst we were live on air. And whilst we’re live on there, about five minutes later, I got a message to say my Twitter account been closed down.

Brian Garrish: For medical misinformation, was it David? I can’t remember what they viewed.

David Scott: They came up with a few explanations as to why they cancelled me. But yeah, that was the main one.

Woes: Yeah, it’s just so incredible! The medical misinformation from the UK Government’s own data! [chuckling]

Brian Garrish: Yeah. But it actually makes sense, because I’m going to be very direct here, and say. If people want to know how the scam works. The scam is very simple. The MHRA collects data which is recorded on vaccine adverse reactions. So it sucks all that data in. It does print it on sheets which are very difficult to view and analyze. But it does produce that data.

But there’s then no risk assessment, no analysis, done on the data which it has collected. So the MHRA – and June Raine [sp] is the chief executive, who’s usually the spokesperson. She’s the one who constantly says:

“Well, the vaccines are working! They’re safe! Benefits outweigh the risks!”

But the scam is that they’ve never investigated their own data on the risks! Even though we’ve got over 1, 800 people dead! And over a million adverse effects!

Alex Thompson: We better tell the audience that the buck doesn’t stop there, because we like to use our research skills in which Mike, who’s not with us this evening, is supreme on the statistical side. But we all have our contributions to make.

We have found that the MHRA only poses as the data owner. Actually, the decisions clinically have to be made – as far as we now understand – by a doctor Pierre Mohammed. Perhaps you might want to add something about him Brian?

Brian Garrish: Well yes this is the Commission on Human Medicines, which is another part of this soup of organizations which the UK government claims are looking after our health and well-being and safety, as far as vaccinations are concerned.

So that gentleman is the head of the commission on Human Medicines. And that organization holds ultimate responsibility for vaccine safety. But they never speak out. You never hear them say anything it’s always, I’ll say, delegated back down the line to June Raine from MHRA. So there’s a little system.

And it works by the fact that there’s lots of good words about who is working hard to protect us from any possible vaccine damage. But the reality is that they never act on any of the information that they’ve got! What they are doing on a hour-by-hour, day-by-day basis, is working with the pharmaceutical companies.

And this is to such an extent that, if you look at the MHRA board meetings which you can find on YouTube, listed as MHRA board meetings. I’m afraid I’ve forgotten her name. But one of the members of the board has allegiance to Bill and Melinda Gates and their organization. So there is no independence in the MHRA whatsoever! !

And it’s primary function is to help develop the pharmaceutical industry world-wide, and to increase their profits.

Alex Thompson: I think what we’re getting at is there are some surprising, maybe not so surprising, similarities between how this scam is operated and how in previous events, or reporting that we’re known for, establishment complicity in child abuse is covered up. A lot of buck passing! And a lot of leaving local, or better known faces, to face the music. To leaving councils, in that case, to sink, or swim.

And in this case, as Brian describes, there is a line right up to the Secretaries of State, who never seem to take responsibility for anything. I think one of the best quotable quotes from last year’s Millennial, Colin, was Godfrey Bloom, when he came on.

And he was speaking about Britain’s then Secretary of State for Health before his fandango with his assistant. Which, of course, may have been me on sen, in order to shuffle him off to his next technocratic post. But anyway, he was Health Secretary at that point as you recall. And Godfrey Bloom memorably told you in Millenniyule 2020:

“At the investment bank I used to work for, Hancock wouldn’t even got in to clean the bloody cars. And it doesn’t help that he looks like a child molester!”

So again [chuckling] people are noticing, comparisons, between different establishment scandals.

[15:43]

Woes: Yeah, indeed! I think that when I first discovered UK Column it was, if I recall correctly, it was to do with, … You see. This is an interesting historical comparison. I think I’d like to bring Brian in here on this. There was the world of the 2000s, in the late 2000s. I think that that was when and the smoking ban came in. And there was that the climate change thing was going on. They were trying to sell it then.

And then I became aware of UK Column, or Brian Garrish, as an individual, at that time, because of the Common Purpose phenomenon.

Brian could you sort of draw a line between Common Purpose and that culture in the late 2000s, to Covid now?

Brian Garrish: Well. I’m going to say for me this is a very easy thing to do. Let’s deal with what we’re up against at the moment. Of course, a lot of people are focused on the, we’ll call it, the hard facts of vaccines whatever you think about Covid.

Let’s assume that there is some form of fluid type virus around. And it’s severe enough that if you’re vulnerable and elderly you can die. And the response of the government is to say that we’re all going to be injected with a pharmaceutical product. That’s hard reality.

But there’s something else that’s going on. And we can call it “propaganda”, because there is a massive, massive, propaganda exercise, control of the media, going on in order to facilitate everything around Covid-19 and lockdown vaccinations.

But alongside the propaganda that we can see as the adverts in the paper or, for example, that absolutely disgraceful broadcast that Boris Johnson gave to the nation last night. Pitiful broadcast!

Alongside that type of propaganda, we’ve got something much deeper. And that is the use of applied behavioural psychology to change the way people think and behave. And the track for that psychology, if viewers, listeners want somewhere easy to start, they should simply search online for a document called Mindspace that’s M-I-N-D-S-P-A-C-E, all one word, mindspace dot PDF.

And if you search for that you’ll find the British Cabinet Office document, dated 2010. And if you go, I suggest you read it all, you should, because it’s important. But if you go to the bottom of page 66, there is a paragraph which says:

“That we the British government can change the way people think and behave, and they will not even know this has happened, or if they realize their behaviour has changed, they will not know how it was done.”

Now this is very dangerous applied psychology, which is now fully in the hands of the British government, via essentially the Behavioural Insights Team which was an integral part of the cabinet office. But this was the type of a plate behavioural psychology which Common Purpose was using in order to reframe it’s so-called “future leaders”..

So when I look back to the work that I did in the very, very early 2000s, and a little bit before when I was aware of Common Purpose, and I was tracking what was happening with them, they were choosing people in all sectors of society, … Could be public sector schools, businesses, police, military, NHS, even within Parliament. And those people were being gently “reframed” to hold new values.

So Common Purpose was effectively the Trojan horse that was putting it’s people in positions apparent influence across the whole fabric of government and our society.

And. So when we march through the 2000s, let’s take ourselves into somewhere like 2010, 2012, what you can see is these chosen leaders are the people who are the ones helping to facilitate all of the policy that we can now see is being used to enact everything to do with Covid and the vaccines.

[20:37]

Woes: I could I just interrupt? I should have explained for the audience that Common Purpose was ostensibly a management training organization. When was it founded? I think it was, …

Brian Garrish:1985. Is when Julia Middleton the then chief executive, said. That it was formed. And her story is that she’d been over in America, and previously she’d worked for The Industrial Society, which is a so-called “think tank”.

But she’d then been in America. I believe she was in Chicago and working with the “Chicago Set”, i.e., Barack Obama’s roots. And she discovered this wonderful system. And then she came back to UK.

And she said she was able to raise a large sum of money through a number of banks. She would never disclose which banks. But we know Deutsche Bank was one of them. And then all of a sudden Common Purpose popped up everywhere in the country! To train thousands, and thousands, of these future leaders.

So it called itself a charity. But it’s whole basis was political. And indeed at one stage they were actually operating out of the office of the Deputy Prime Minister when John preScott was having his dalliances in Westminster.

Woes: You see, this is, … Sorry I muted you Alex just because there’s background noise. But you can unmute yourself. But let me get into, …

Alex Thompson: Thank you. Thanks for that. Just, at this point, in the narrative, she came back in 85. But I have her pamphlet from 1981 published in Britain entitled “Quality Circles” and published under her maiden name. And the point of that was she doesn’t give details on which American industrialists and Chicago satanists gave her orders. But it basically says:

“The plebs produce poor work in Britain. And in order to get them to do as they’re told, they’re going to have to engage in struggle sessions. Sit in circles and tell each other what they did wrong this week.”

That was the founding idea.

Brian Garrish: That’s reframing. Doing that is starting to get people to talk in that way in front of other people, is reframing.

Woes: Yeah. And so I think. One of the reasons this is significant is there’s one theory of what’s going on? Now. Is that it’s a decentralized, just sort of amorphous, social force, social consensus, that has a thousand ways of reinforcing itself.

But I think Common Purpose indicates that actually this is quite top-down. It’s quite coordinated. I mean, it results in a social consensus, well whatever, a managerial consensus. But it’s created in the first place, generated, in a very deliberated way. A very conscious way! And, of course, there’s a lot of effort and a huge amount of funding that goes into make making that happen.

And in the case of Common Purpose you’ve got an organization that, … I should have said this at the start. In the 2000s it became apparent. And I think this was, because of New Labour largely, but maybe it pre-existed that. There was a lot of movement between large corporations, government, charities, NGOs, people would show up, …

I mean, a good example since then would be Nick Clegg, who was first in I think in the EU, then he was a British national politician. And now he’s working at Facebook. He’s very high up at Facebook. I mean, that’s a perfect career!

Alex Thompson: Actually, what happened in Scotland in the same time frame was a bit the other way around. But with the same results in the end. Because people came in from US-based globalist think tanks. And a few I think from big tech. David might know more than I do.

But then with the sudden and unexpected collapse of the Labour vote in Scotland, and the SNP forming a government in 2007 with an ideological vacuum, other than blaming the English, this created the perfect opportunity for people to be brought in.

Many of them were actually from Mandarin lives south of the border. Sir David Elvich [sp] who became the top civil servant in ScotGov, the Scottish government in the early SNP period.

Bill Alexander, the Englishman who ended up running the Child Department at Highland Council, pioneering the Named Person Scheme. And some of these people if I’m not mistaken, David, have gone into financial situations after their time in government, thus being exactly the opposite of what was happening in England at the time.

[25:34]

David Scott: I mean, Sir John Elvich was, of course, Common Purpose to the core! He was a Common Purpose supremo! He was taken by Common Purpose to take the message of the charity to Hong Kong, once he was finished running Scotland.

And his big innovation was the Scottish model of government, which had been running for about seven years by the time I found out it existed. And that was no departmental boundaries. It’s one organization.

And when you factor in the Common Purpose approach, which is networks of informal influence. And people operating beyond their authority, you end up with a very dangerous situation where you can see what’s being done.

But there’s no clarity to as to who is actually responsible for anything. And there’s no clarity as to who makes the decisions, and who sets the policy. It becomes this iceberg-like mass moving slowly across society, and taking all before it! That’s what they’re trying to achieve.

Woes: That’s an excellent point. Thank you for because that’s a very good summary of what this actually does. And I think the phrase “leading beyond authority”, was that not the title of her book, Julia Middleton’s book?

Alex Thompson: Right.

Woes: Could either any of you give a summary of what that actually implies, “leading beyond authority”? Because obviously it’s going to cause a lot of fuzziness about, as you just said David, about who did what, who’s responsible for this, who should be appealed to, who should be persuaded, top down, leading beyond it.

Alex Thompson: That is probably one for Brian. But Brian in your answer don’t forget to mention, the unification of Cornwall Council. Because that’s a good nutshell example of how even elected councillors are told we have cabinet responsibility, which has the same effect. Nobody’s responsible for anything, just as in the Scottish model of government. All the ministers act as one.

Brian Garrish: Well yeah, that’s certainly part of it. I think I might just come in a little bit below that, if you like. And say what Common Purpose did, is that once it got itself established in a city, it would seek out people of influence, people that it thought were worthy of coming into its courses. And then it would mix groups of people.

So in a Common Purpose course you might have somebody from the local police, somebody from a couple of schools, somebody from the local council. And they would all be invited to talk on various subjects about their own job, in the first instance. And the other members, of course, would find this interesting. And they would learn from that. But what they were doing with the people is saying:

“Well here you are as a group of people. You’ve come together. You’re not in your normal professional role. And we can now throw problems at you. And ask you how you would solve them.”

So, what is happening very subtly is that you’re taking people outside the boundaries of their own expertise and their own professional limitations.

If we focused on a police officer that would make life quite simple for us. But now in this new group of people they start to have a look at how they would solve problems of crime in the city, or how they would deal with problems of health within the city. And with the addition of some nice evenings out, and people being able to sit down eat together, and have a drink together, teamwork forms amongst this group of people.

And they form the view that they now have the ability to work – I’m deliberately going to use this phrase – “outside their existing professional silos”. This is the expression by Julia Middleton. They’re going to come outside their “silos” and work with other people they don’t usually work with, in order to solve problems.

And then Common Purpose stirs the pot and helps this process by linking together people that have been trained with Common Purpose courses, so that they continue to work unseen across the city.

And the best example I can give of this was that in Plymouth at one stage I’d never heard of Common Purpose, then I discover it. Then I discover it’s prevalent in a lot of organizations and professions in Plymouth. But I then discovered that people who were sat alongside me in the chamber of commerce were Common Purpose trained. But they never mentioned it. But what they were doing unseen.

And the Daily Mail when it printed its 11 pages on Common Purpose, described it as a quasi-Masonic organization. And what they were getting at was the Common Purpose people liaised with each other unseen! So you’ve created a group of people who believe they’ve been selected as future leaders. And that they are now going to be working to solve problems outside of the limitations of their normal professional job.

It’s a very clever, very devious, system!

[31:28]

Woes: Hold on a second David. I just want to get this clarified. Because some people would say that actually sounds like a good idea to blend different people’s expertise, their experience, the attitude that each one has adopted in his profession. He can give in fresh insights to someone else in some other profession. So it’s new ways of thinking about problems. Some people would say that sounds good.

Brian Garrish: Well they could say that. And I could go so far as to say:

“Yep! There are some positive elements in doing that.”

However, when you start to see the Common Purpose documents showing, for example, that where they set up Advisory Boards, and in a city when they’d got people that they knew they’d got them as Common Purpose graduates as for future leaders.

And these people had some gravitas in their position. Maybe they were the chief executive of the local council. Maybe they were quite a senior policeman in the local police force. They put these people on what they called Common Purpose Advisory Boards.

And those Advisory Boards would then seek out the next people to be trained. But the point I really want to make is that we were able to show documentation where Common Purpose was telling the local police Common Purpose advisory board member what they were to do.

And they were also, particularly in local authorities, telling the Common Purpose graduate, that they’d obtained, to help them seek funding from the council in order to train more people.

Why can I be very confident about this? Because I have a very old website, but the data is still exactly absolutely correct. The website is called cpexposed.com. And if you go onto that website there’s a database system where you can search for documents. And you can read the actual documents that we were able to obtain, now many years ago. But they still show the evidence where Common Purpose was absolutely using people in very important positions, chief executives in local authorities, in the NHS, police.

They were even getting into military camps to do training. Which I found astonishing! And Common Purpose was instructing their graduate within the police, or the NHS, or the local authority, to do their bidding.

Woes: In other words, these graduates, these members of Common Purpose, are, regardless of their profession, in some sense they are working for Common Purpose, even in their day-to-day lives.

Brian Garrish: Yes.

Alex Thompson: Yes! Yes! Absolutely! I looked up the string “GCHQ”, my former employer, Britain’s signals intelligence agency, on Brian’s website cpxposed.com. And I found three names to my astonishment where two were people that I knew. Well, one personally, and one by repute on the staff news groups.

And both of these two had been initially on message with the thinking of most of the staff. And sometime in the mid 2000s which I think correlated with when Brian had records of them being trained and becoming a graduate of Common Purpose, they became under a bit relentingly hostile to the old ethos of GCHQ!

[35:08]

Woes: That’s incredible! So did you actually witness that?

Alex Thompson: Yes! And it wasn’t just my personal impression. In one of the cases the person who had taken this course at GCHQ and become a Common Purpose graduate, was described by at least two of my other very solid older colleagues as a “changed person”. As not the person they were before. A new set of values attacking their old person, their old self.

Woes: Wow. That’s so sinister. David can I bring you back into ask to answer the question of what is meant by leading beyond authority? And you can talk about Scotland though.

David Scott: Yeah yes this is sort of putting in there a moment ago. This is what I was going to say is. You raised the issue about the link between Common Purpose and the Covid policy.

Woes: Yes.

David Scott: And this is the link in my view is the whole concept of leading beyond authority. Because we have well in Scotland we’ve got Devi Sridhar. And I understand that Nicola Sturgeon doesn’t, or at least, wouldn’t do a thing on Covid policy without Devi Sridhar.

Devi Sridhar is 37 years old. She is an Indian-American. She’s a Rhodes scholar. And she’s written a book called Governing Global Health with Chelsea Clinton.

But she’s making decisions that alter society! She’s deciding when the economy closes down! She’s deciding when children can see faces of adults! She’s deciding when people can go to school, children could go to school. She’s deciding when you can go to a hospital to see your elderly relative. She’s deciding everything about how we operate! Based on what? Where’s the authority? It’s so far beyond the authority you can’t see it!

And there is a requirement for an almost unbelievable amount of arrogance to think that you can organize society, based on either a niche bit of information, because you’ve done some work in epidemiology, or you’ve done perhaps some rather badly executed computer programming. And you have a model that’s predicting the future course of pandemics. And that makes you somehow qualified to instruct the world, or the nation, on everything!

Alex Thompson: And I have a nice update on this. I have a nice update on this, David. Because when you were on UK Column news today, as you always are on Mondays, one of the segments was about Boris Johnson getting at Number 10 Downing Street an equivalent of Devi Sridhar. Someone to tell him what to do.

And it’s a chap called Dan Rosenfield. Who had an incredible and improbable rise from being a German graduate, or a graduate in the German language, to being a Treasury bod. And here’s the link. The New Statesman, as we quoted today, is tapping up former colleagues for what this Dan Rosenfield is going to be “The Enforcer”, as he’s called, at Downing Street. The man without whom Boris Johnson:

“Will not sleep, yea will not wake.”

And this is it.:

“The former treasury colleague says the truth is that Number 10 has not yet recovered from the tragic early death of Sir Jeremy Hayward, the last enforcer. Dan Rosenfield is potentially a worthy successor to Jeremy. He is somebody who understands morale, maths, markets, M16, and M15. If you’re looking for somebody who can operate well in the deep centre, Dan Rosenfield has got the full package.”

End of quote. I’ve never heard of the “deep centre” before. I thought we were supposed to be on top of these things. But that shows you something. And then in the next paragraph in their own rubric the new statesmen add that what the deep centre means is:

“The most important decision-making across the institutions of government.”

And The New Statesman says that:

“Rosenfield’s knowledge of this deep centre is considered his greatest asset.”

Woes: Would one way to characterize this be that it’s the sort of clandestine implementation of a technocracy?

Alex Thompson: Yes!

Woes: All right! [chuckling] Okay.

David Scott: A managerial state. The idea that democracy for all of its flaws means you have some control, has been, that’s gone! But it’s been removed very subtly.

[40:00]

Alex Thompson: So yeah, you’ve done a lot of reading David of the golden, well not, anti-golden period around 1948. One of the many books that came out this year. And it’s been touted in the Dutch Parliaments – I live in the Netherlands here now, so I know this – is a book by James Burnham in the US called The Managerial State, just about this. And the subtitle when it was first published is What is Happening in the World Today.

So Burnham, who is no sloucher, thought. This was a key thing about the post-war world. And the institutions were many of them especially in Britain forged in that year 1948. It was the go ahead for technocracy.

Woes: And so it’s almost embarrassing that we’re only catching up with it, and defining it.

Alex Thompson: We were the first. We were the first two, or three years ago to discover a memorandum from I think the third, or fourth of January, 1948. Have I got the date, right? Just after the New Year break, or during it, Prime Minister Clement Atlee dictated a memo:

“Saying Britain is going to invent something called European Military Union.”

Nobody reported on that, for decades! Until we did in 2018, 2019, I think gentlemen.

Brian Garrish: Yeah.

Woes: European Military Union, would that be the start of the EU?

Alex Thompson: Well yes, that’s the whole point. It was these guys need military union therefore we’re going to have to invent a political pretext for it.

So we’re going to in the first instance tell Benelux to start existing. Because the Belgians and Dutch had been often former foes. But the Belgians, Dutch, and Luxembourgers were told once their government in exile returned, at end of the war:

“If you want any Marshall Plan money you’re going to have to become a quasi-unified state with no customs borders between you.”

And then that was then spun out to the whole EU

Woes: Right? So there’s the sort of artificial merging of States. So that they’re more managerially convenient.

Alex Thompson: That’s exactly it. Yeah. Sorry about the clock chiming in the background I’ve just muted most of that. But that’s exactly what it is. Well the long history of technocracy preferring to work at a European level.

But the key thing is, it came out of Manhattan, and the City of London. There’s no aspects of European unification after the war, that –. And I’ve been burying my nose in continental documents as long as I’ve been over here. Like I’ve never found anything in French, German, Italian, or Dutch, which suggests that the original six members of the EEC. Well, let’s remove Germany and Italy, because they were the foes, right?

But let’s say the continental allies, right? So France and Benelux, there’s no evidence that they innately and genuinely wished for any kind of union on any level!

That Jean Monet was, as reported widely in books such as The Great Deception by Booker and North, was widely – and including by De Gaul – correctly understood to be an Anglo-American stooge with bad debts to, should we say Deep State companies. In his case, the Hudson’s Bay company. But it’s just one of the many tentacles of the old money in the City.

Woes: Gosh! There’s so much to know isn’t there’s? So much to find out! And I can just imagine a dense fabric of deals, and organizations, and bribery, blackmail.

Alex Thompson: Yeah. The Italians were co-opted pretty soon. There wasn’t much bribery needed they just took old unreformed commies like Alberto Spinelli who has rooms in his honour at the European Parliament these days.

And Antonio Gramsci. He hasn’t got any suite of rooms named after him in Brussels. But he was of the same era. And down at the Italian end they were just openly writing:

“We need to do this to overturn the Patriarchy.”

But in France and Benelux, it was a bit more dressed up as:

“We won’t be able to suck the teat of Anglo-American investment. If we don’t do this.”

Woes: Right. So what? And this is a very sort of open question. What is the top level of this web, as it were? I mean,

Alex Thompson: Brian. And I have answered this enough times in our own words in previous interviews. I’ve never heard David go for that one. So I’m very intrigued what he might say!

Woes: Because obviously just to introduce this. You can talk about the manager of a leisure centre in Nottingham. That would be the bottom level. But then you go up through the echelons. And do we end at the EU? Do we end at the British national level? Do we end at the UN? What? How high [chuckling] does it go?

Alex Thompson: We can’t enter the UN. I’ll say this before I hand over to David. We can’t enter the UN, because we know who created the UN. It was created on privately owned land in San Francisco, in an irregularly and not according to international law, in an irregularly called meeting.

And it was not really the diplomatic envoys that got it going. It was a wartime slogan that the allies had become the United Nations as of 1943. Which Roosevelt was already talking about. So, well, over to David. He’s looked into this more deeply.

[45:12]

David Scott: Well, I don’t know about that! I find this one of the hardest questions. I think the Column finds this one of the hardest questions. Where does the instructions actually come from? Because it’s manifestly not the people you’re seeing.

At a low level I had the pleasure of going along to an SNP Yes Movement meeting in Perth. At the Salutation Hotel some years ago. And I went there just to ask some questions and see what would happen. And it was remarkable, because it was all tactics, they were getting people geed up for the next independence referendum. This would be about 2016, 17, I think.

So they thought we’re going to go again, and clearly there was a tactic. The tactic was we’re going to do just what we did the last time, but the Labour Party is collapsing so we’ll win this time. That was it. They didn’t go any further than that.

And all the discussion was mobilizing the troops, who would go where, how would get people out in the street, how would get little shops set up, and street stalls, and badges, and things. But there was no ideas. And I found this very funny. So I asked them, you know:

“What’s the policy relating to Scottish independence? And where does the policy come from?”

And there was a kind of embarrassed silence in the top table. And they said:

“Well you might try common [word unclear].”

Really? So they actually had no idea where the policies were coming from. And that problem is visible at national cabinet level, as well. So it doesn’t reside there.

So when you go to the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization, some of the UN bodies time trying to get closer to it. But it’s not quite there either.

Alex Thompson: When you get it to the Bank for International Settlements, you’re getting perhaps closer.

David Scott: A wee bit closer.

Alex Thompson: But then above them, because they own the central banks, that own the banks, and et cetera, et cetera. And, of course, the level above that is what’s interesting. Hedge funds, and private investors.

The same people who set up the world’s first Central Banks, the Bank of Sweden, the Bank of England, the Bank of Scotland, the Bank of France, the same clubs around 1700.

These people turn out to be closely guarded lists of shareholders, right? So they are both acting above and below the level of the banks. And they are signaling often in their dummy run exercises and their think pieces and their think tanks, what is going to be the policy at the level David just mentioned, like the World Health Organization.

But there’s clearly capture of many of these organizations. Anything like that calls itself the World Health Organization, or the American Medical Association, sounds like it is a conclave of the best minds. In that case, the discipline of medicine. But they are bought and paid for. We know the date and format, for example, in which David Rockefeller bought up, or the Rockefeller clan of his age, of that time, brought up the AMA. In fact, called it into existence.

And likewise Gates have played that role with regard to the WHO and got it diplomatic status in Switzerland.

So you’re looking to a small number of old money families.

David Scott: When you say Gates and you say Rockefeller, you’re immediately talking about the tax exempt foundations, right? And the Dodds Report that gives you information about that.

So that level of control of big money, where the people who actually made the money, are long gone. But there are people who control it. And who have agendas. And the agendas are very difficult to get at.

And then you’ve got the question what makes the agenda? And then you’re getting into criminality, sometimes satanism, sometimes various forms of belief, you’re getting into the spiritual war.

And ultimately, my view is that’s ultimately the battle you’re fighting. It’s principalities and powers. It’s not any easily identified human organization.

Woes: Thank you. That is a very interesting answer. Brian, would you like to have a go at this question?

[50:00]

Brian Garrish: Well I’m gonna say I fully support where we’ve just got to. But I just like to put in an intermediate step. And that if we saw, if we’re happy with the concept, the Common Purpose established itself in order to choose future leaders, which it recruited, it trained, it then let loose in order to seed and propagate its own agenda, we can move up the ladder to somewhere like the World Economic Forum. Where we’ve got Klaus Schwab running an organization that is selecting global leaders.

And today on the UK Column news we mentioned a website which has got a very good list of names which I took the trouble just to call up the website. It’s called Tara Blue which is that-A-R-A-B-L-U-E Tara blue, dot com. And you will find on that website very nice list of all the world leaders who have actually been recruited and trained through Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum system.

So we can now show that across the world in all sorts of different countries, we’ve got leaders, political leaders, or leaders within corporations, or foundations, who have been trained through the World Economic Forum system.

So we can see Klaus Schwab, we can understand a bit about him, because we can read what he is happy to declare about himself. But really we have to ask a question. Who put Klaus Schwab in the position he’s in? Who provides him with the money to enable him to do what he’s doing?

And very quickly we’ve moved from the World Economic Forum, global leaders, through to the fact that the people who control that must be people who also control money.

And it’s the same with Bill Gates. You can look at Bill Gates and say:

“Well Bill Gates is a very powerful man.”

Well he is by what he does on the ground. But actually if he’s got billions squirreled away in bank accounts, the people who own Bill Gates are the people who control his bank accounts.

So it’s very easy to climb up the pyramid. And it has to be the people that control the money who are at the top.

But I think the weakness that, I’ll say many of us, because I used to fall into the same trap. What happens with people is they then just focus on the money people that we know. So they will talk about Rothschilds, or the Rockefellers.

But I’m going to say that the trouble with that, is that they are people we see. I think the people for really inventing the policy and driving it through, are people who have immense financial control within these private banking systems.

But we don’t even know who their names are.

Alex Thompson: I’ll give a stab. I’ll tell you in general terms. And I said this in. One of my most popular talks at Alternative View, when I talked about the bloodlines, and the history of the world. There’s said to be 13 families, often called satanic bloodlines. And Rothschild and Rockefeller are often called number one. And number two on that list.

But every time I’ve mentioned that. And I think the authors of the concept, as well Robin [word unclear] and Fritz Springmeier would be quick to add this. I always add these other visible guys, as Brian was just saying. Above and beyond them, you have got basically in the part of the world I’m in now. From about the North Sea down to northern Italy, which has always been the linchpin of European and world economic progress. And where the monopolies and the cabals hang out.

That’s where you’ve got the really old families that shun publicity. They tend to have French, or Italian names although some of them migrated to what’s now Germany, during the Middle Ages. And some of the names that keep popping up there are Orcini, Alavichini, Hazer, Breakspear, an English name, as a family that supplied England’s one and only Pope in history. And also some of the minor, now minor seeming, Bavaria in princely dynasties. That area of the world. Switzerland and Austria is right in the middle of it too. But Belgium and southern Netherlands as well.

Those families are to this day where you find the de facto monopoly. For example, there’s a big five set of companies that control most of the primary food supply in the world, certainly grain. And to this day, even though the US and Canada and Russia supply far, far more grain in other parts of the world, obviously. Look at the map. The companies that make sure that food gets sold, ultimate ownership of those companies, is still in the continent of Europe.

Not even the City of London. So we’re looking a bit more closely there.

And with regard to that, I don’t want to get into the debate about the Jesuits. But it’s interesting that some of the people who were at the very top of Britain’s, let’s have war with Russia agenda, a couple of years ago. People who were as I found out pulling the strings of the top foreign office experts on Russia and neighbouring countries at the time I was in service.

David did some personal digging, because some of them turned out to be registered to a disused mill just down the road from him. And we found an undue prevalence didn’t we David of Irish-Catholic priests, and strange things going on in the leadership of the thought of what of these groups.

Like the Integrity Initiative. And again, I’m quick to add, I’m not saying the Roman Catholic Church is the top layer. But this is again, old money, Vatican area, Central, or Western Europe. That seems to be where all the nodes come together before we lose track of them.

[56:12]

David Scott: Well the Integrity Initiative was an interesting diversion over the last, what 2019, 2020, sort of area? Just before Covid. And it was an organization with very little substance and a great deal of influence. And it was made up of a former NATO official. A businessman with a very interesting past, and the ability to get spirited out of places like Beirut quite quickly, who was probably some sort of spook, secret service. And a former Roman Catholic priest who was then running a charity to bring peace, love, and harmony to the Middle East.

And they decided that what they were going to do was sort out the narrative with respect to Russia. And get involved in all forms of communication and shaping the narrative. And whether they originated, or whether they were repeating, they were going over ideas which we were finding were being pirated in the top of the British army, the top of United States, Air Force, Navy.

Alex Thompson: They got in one day, in one day, they got Major Pedro Banos, a very fine Spanish officer, sacked, just at the time his candidacy was announced, or his selection was announced to be Spain’s new National Security Advisor. Simply through pulling strings with their own people and the press. But go on David.

David Scott: And what they were saying was concepts like:

“Peace and war is not a binary.”

You could never be entirely at peace, or entirely at war. That’s old-fashioned thinking! Like men women, I suppose. But that’s old-fashioned thinking! Everything, you’re always at war in a funny kind of way! And everything that your country does and is, is part of that war. So your industry, okay. Your culture, your churches, your belief system, your education system, everything! The degree to which your population will be obedient to the state, that’s a weapon of war!

Everything is a weapon of war! And it’s live and it’s active. And we have to be aggressive. And we have to be going out. And we have to be defeating these pesky Russians in this battle of ideas.

And it looks like the sort of tactics that the Soviet Union were running to destabilize the West. We were running to destabilize Russia.

Alex Thompson: And there’s a closer link than that actually. Because the very successful and little talked about German equivalent of GCHQ in the Third Reich. It was the [word unclear], literally the Research Bureau. And all it’s best tricks such as plotting what the population was thinking, and shifting the Overton window, went hook line and sinker over to a private corporation, the Mitre Corporation on the West coast of the US. Which is a big NSA data holder, and contractor.

And one of the GCHQ heroes of the war, Golden Welchman. And we know this is genuine, because he unexpectedly got prosecuted for it by the FBI in the States, with the Brits leaning on him. So genuine disclosure. He, in all innocence, at the end of his career in the late 70s, wrote it, The Hutt Six Story, is the name of his book, on my part in deciphering Nazi codes.

[60:12]

And the last chapter which is probably what he really got persecuted for, because when the book was reissued it was taken out. Is one in which he gayly says:

“Yes well from now on the enemy is the domestic population. There’s going to be this thing called domestic extremists. And that’s where the enemy is going to pop up. So we have to be ever vigilant and monitor the totality of telecoms.”

So that that thinking comes right from both totalitarian models of the early 20th century. Which is yet one more indication that the thinking behind those models, I think, was neither German, nor Russian. But more at home in the City of London, and in Wall Street.

David Scott: And when you go around to, … What I said earlier on, that ultimately it’s a spiritual battle. If you view life as an extension of warfare. If you view there’s no possibility of peace with your fellow man, it’s just a different way of dominating him. If your view is that it’s ultimately a great big survival of the fittest Darwinist world, then that generates a certain society. That generates a certain way of treating your fellow man.

And it generates an atmosphere and the background where organizations like Common Purpose can thrive, because there is no alternative spiritual viewpoint to push back against them. Because It’s all just about survival, and competition, and some sort of social Darwinist process.

So:

“Where’s my advantage this week?”

There’s nothing, the finer points of life, the nobler ideals, these are viewed as irrelevant, or old-fashioned, or out of date, or.

Brian Garrish: Weak! Viewed as weak!

David Scott: Weak, yeah.

Alex Thompson: But a lot of them are British thinkers, because it’s Malthusianism. A lot of the best dissidents these days from clergymen, through to former bankers, are saying we’re up against Malthusianism, right?

But Thomas Malthus has a direct line through to Francis Galton, the cousin who basically ghost wrote, or whispered ideas to Darwin. Particularly on his less scientifically based social Darwinism site. Galton lived rather longer than Darwin, right until the eve of the First World War. And was a mate of the Huxley brothers! Whose father was quite a dodgy character in himself.

But Julian who wrote the charter for the World Health Organization, the only so-called UN body which has a constitution, by the way. Another example of how private money put things into operation and gave them the mandates.

And, of course, Aldous, who did it more in fiction, through Brave New World. They’re both saying:

“This is going to be the way of the world, from now on.”

So again, we’re back with a few rather disproportionately British, as well, old money families, saying that:

“Nature will be read in tooth and claw.”

Basically.

Woes: Well I suppose that brings us to Covid and the present era. I don’t even know how to approach this. Because there are so many things that have been said that could link to it. Let’s say that there is a programme to subdue the general public, and condition them for a certain future, in which. They will be much less numerous. Would that be accurate?

Brian Garrish: For me it would be. There’s a cull! There’s no question of the fact that very large numbers of people, certainly in UK but in other countries. But we can talk with confidence in UK. Large numbers of particularly elderly, vulnerable people have already been killed off.

[64:57]

Woes: And that’s even before we get to the vaccine. Because a lot of elderly people were killed off. Well. Let’s say that they died in 2020 through being stuffed into care homes. And so on.

[Transcript Quality from here 2/5 Stars]

Brian Garrish: Go just interject there? Sorry to do that. But I’m going to say no, actually well before that. Because the one of the key clues we got to what the real agenda was, is if we go to the Staff’s Hospital in UK, where it emerged that supposedly thousands of elderly people had died unnecessarily as a result of hospital procedures. But some time ago I was able to speak to a key individual who’d been part of the government’s initial investigation team into the Mid-Staff Hospital crisis. And they said to me. I was sat in their own home. They said to me that actually the investigation revealed that the numbers were not fifteen hundred two and a half thousand people who died in Mid-Staff. They were up in the 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,000 people! And similar levels of death were actually occurring in at least quote:

“10, or 11 hospitals.”

Alex Thompson: And. This was a good five, or six years before Covid.

Brian Garrish: Yeah, so this individual was talking up towards hundred thousand of elderly people who were dispatched.

Alex Thompson: And we were getting undertakers from various parts of Britain as well. Yeah I don’t understand your thunder. But this was also at the same time frame but go on.

Brian Garrish: Just before you go in that direction Alex. So this was happening in mid-staff’s hospital there was an inquiry team put together and they submitted a report exposing that this was the level of deaths which was much, much higher than the level being reported publicly. What then happened was a new team was brought in which subsequently Whitewashed the original report. And the reason that the particular individual got in contact with me was. Because the name of the new team that the government brought in to do that Whitewash was called the Common Purpose team. And that’s rather telling that was one incident but also, of course, we had the Liverpool care pathway running which was sold as being a way of giving people the so-called good death. But then it emerged that, of course, people were being killed via that system. And the reality that we see as a result of our own research and many good and detailed reports from people in the NHS is that the Liverpool care pathway never stopped. It continued although it was continuing undeclared as to what it was by name. So they didn’t use Liverpool care pathway. But they were definitely killing people. And then we arrived at the situation where we had the start of the Covid crisis where they knowingly discharged elderly people who had Covid who were in hospital beds they discharged them into care homes residential homes and locked them down with the other vulnerable elderly people. And, of course, the deaths, tens of thousands reported in the paper but the reality papers. But the reality is hundreds of thousands. Those deaths have been noted and recorded the Independent the express the Mirror even the Daily Mail has talked about this but nobody’s followed it through.

Alex Thompson: It’s so evident that Scotland’s corrupt crown office the monopoly prosecutor had to open a case against a care home on the isle of skye and poultry for that very culpability and in most cases the Crown office and similar continental monopoly state prosecutors will simply ditch the nearly half of their caseload that they don’t think is going to be easy to prove, or not politically opportune. But it was so blaringly obvious that they’ve run with it for quite a while at the Crown office other things that happened well before Covid mid — 2010s besides the things Brian mentioned were a string of undertakers from various parts of Britain talking to us about distressingly large numbers of elderly and children deceased coming to them in an emaciated state and we and a number of other free media outlets were broadcasting with face and voice unaltered at that time as well people who had left care homes talking about the deliberate dehydration whether it was called care pathway, or not, or just a bunch of thuggish carers within a local care home there was a deliberate withholding of water from people in care homes. And then by horrible things like giving the elderly foul water to drink and then saying ah you see she doesn’t want to drink. And we then went a step further and spoke to a gentleman in Chester Dr Mark Jones very well qualified and he’s never given up on his mother’s case who is speaking in quite lurid terms but without with the evidence about a bunch of bent lawyers [70:00] in towns like Chester no doubt up and down the country. But there’s a particular concentration there who managed to be in league with certain staff in their care homes to such an extent that the smothering by a pillow, or the dehydration magically happens just in the same time window of certain weeks when the legacy runs out. When there’s no more money to be milked from the system. So this was all in place well before Covid. And very similar things I can tell you have been going on for 20 years here in the Netherlands which is famous for being pioneers of things like euthanasia and Dr killing the doctor killing you. It’s just that there’s less speaking out over here. And I have to say even more fear of the doctor among the elderly over here, because there’s no they don’t make any bones about it over there it’s just okay time for your death chat.

Brian Garrish: Now David you’ve done some interviews with nurses who’ve been aware of these sorts of things happening.

David Scott: Well yes the nurses are, you know, they’re astonished for what with what actually went down. Some aspects of it you have what one very bizarre thing and I was speaking to a senior consultant in a Scottish hospital on this subject just to check that I had interpreted this correctly he confirmed it that what happened when Covid came in. You had maybe 150 years worth of medical practice building experience on experience refining safety Protocols and developing the most effective way so that you could cut someone open take a bit out stitch them back together. And they live without infection and without any more distress that is necessary. And all of these processes have been had been improved since the days where it was a literally a theatrical performance where speed was everything, because there was no anesthesia. And there was no antiseptic. And after all, this improvement they had all of these procedures to how you treat people who are ill whether it’s operations, or whether it’s ill with other things. And Covid came along. And there was panic. And all of the processes got bend and they started changing the most fundamental parts of how people were handled where they where they’re prepared for surgery where they come around after surgery how they’re monitored how with all the fundamentals got changed in what looked like a moment of blind panic, because they were so convinced that Covid was this unbelievable killer! This is so deadly this is at the end of the end of the world type scenario.

Woes: Well there was the footage coming out of China of people just sort of slouching around zombie-like and dropping dead in the street.

David Scott: And statistics coming out of Italy which later proved to be not true. But the initial message was this is terrifying and the medical profession dropped all of its protective procedures and tried to rewrite them all on the hoof. And that really happened. So that caused a lot of problems. You had lots of just bad practice was introduced. And this is what the nurses were speaking at you can’t do that’s not safe and you’re not allowed to speak out in the society in which we currently live if you work particularly if you work for an arm of the state your comments and criticisms are not required if we want you to have an opinion we’ll give it to you.

Alex Thompson: So shall not bless theme the name of the NHS thy god.

David Scott: Yeah, they got pressured. And then you had things like the vaccination programme was being run out and we picked this up very quickly and asked questions to the Scottish government you’re running a vaccination programme into the care homes, because it’s the elderly they got it first. And as soon as you run that out there was a doubling, or tripling of the death rate there was a huge spike in death when did that lasted for three weeks.

Woes: When did that happen? Was that in like at the start of this year.

David Scott: Yes yes from December through to February this year yeah. So there’s a huge spike in deaths, because what and the mechanism is known. Because the vaccines the jabs cause a collapse, or a certainly a huge [75:02] reduction in the natural immune system yeah.

Alex Thompson: If you want to see the pictures we have a bit of a coup. As of last night sorry as of Friday night anyway go to ukcollum.org and look for the recent doctors for covered ethics symposium. And the first presentation given in that video you’ll find there is the almost the only pathologist in the world that has bothered to report to the world about cutting open patients who had died after Covid jabs and finding the be lymphocytes sorry the yes it is lymphocytes and various other types of cells clustered right inside the organs. It’s yeah I’ve probably got the name of the cells wrong there Brian you must correct me.

Brian Garrish: Well the main thing they were pointing out was what they were talking about the spiked proteins. But they were showing.

Alex Thompson: The response to them that is done by these, you know, I always hate getting medical details wrong. But it’s a certain kind of leukocyte the killer cells cluster inside the organs, because they see that every organ is producing expressing the spike protein that’s there that’s triggered as a result of getting the genetic jabs.

Brian Garrish: Yeah. So these were actually shown on screen are the tissue slides with a qualified professional describing what you can see slides around the heart, or the heart membranes kidneys skin. And there was also another professional showing computer images of people’s eyes retinas and showing the damage that had occurred to those from vaccines. So as Alex has said if people go to that symposium they instead of listening to us they can listen to the qualified medical professionals describing the damage they’re seeing inside bodies as a people’s bodies as a result of vaccination.

David Scott: And the three week spike in death rate that was replicated as the vaccination programme ran through the population doing cohort by cohort so, you know, started off with over the 80s and then went in roughly decades by decade down through the population, the same spike in death rate was visible in each age interval and turn. And it’s quite the it’s quite clearly visible in the starts. And there’s a professor of professor fenton a risk analysis expert who’s speaking out on this. Just a few days ago so this has happened and that’s. If you like in addition to the blood clots. And the other more direct causes of death, because you’re talking there about a reduction in the immune system and therefore anything that happens to be floating around might kill you. So it solves particular concern. When you see what’s happened over the last four to eight hours where. We’ve been told that essentially the whole of the adult population of the British Isles is going to be is going to be vaccinated by the third booster job. Inside of three weeks. 80 days 20 million vaccinations nothing like this has ever been happened. But it’s never happened before. And I’m curious as to what will happen if you reduce simultaneously the immune system of basically your entire population all at the one time.

Woes: And in the middle of winter.

David Scott: In the middle.

Alex Thompson: Actually, it puts me in mind when you put it like that of a line in John bunyan’s pilgrim’s progress when one of the ogres in the book. I think it’s giant Pope, or giant pagan well that’s probably giant Pope says to our hero there’ll be no mending of you till more of you be burned!

Woes: Ominous. So if we speak in very general terms then what has happened over the last two years what is Covid what is going on? Alex you take that first. I’ll ask each of you in turn, because I want this like just speak in general terms. And I’d like your each a summary of that from each of you.

Alex Thompson: What is going on right now that we’re not noticing so much with Covid.

Woes: What is Covid? What is the is, …

Alex Thompson: I’ve been doing a lot of thinking about this recently from as many strands as I can. Covid is the seizing upon a genuinely [80:01] novel respiratory illness I’m not sure to what extent being a layman in medicine it’s respiratory borne. But anyway an illness that’s clearly novel and has respiratory symptoms the greatly inflating of that genuine novel problem in medicine in order to bring about a plan which as we’ve been talking about all evening. Well I plan sounds sinister and gets laughed at as a conspiracy theory. So I say a determination a change to society a weaponization of society that was clearly so advanced by 10, or 15 years ago in the English-speaking countries that the people were being lined up ready for it. And the manifestations that this change will particularly have as we now see from the economic side I think Catherine Austin fitz is by far the best commentator on this. The economic repercussion of this is that within two, or three years the sooner if they can get their programming sorted out, genuine crypto-currency will have been replaced by something that looks the same masquerades as the same. But isn’t which is a controlled currency. The link, of course, being digital identity within people’s bodies the tracking of people through not just face facial recognition but their digital their biometric fingerprint wherever they go and whatever they do this is. Again, if you listen to the Bill pawlek from this an interview talking about what’s going on in the 70s. This would this was something that was waiting for the technology to catch up with a plan that the families we’ve been talking about had back then to track their cattle. So that’s the big thing. And then the other big manifestation that’s going to be obvious I don’t mean in the new age sense manifestation just the popping up of it is. That there’s going to be ice I fear war and in very general terms our Deep State wants the war, to begin this side of 2025, because we will might just about still outgun Russia and China and Iran and their Deep State would rather hang back until the latter half of the decade. Because then they think they will comprehensively outclass in every domain including cyber and space. But as with the previous World Wars standing above and behind both sides are the gentlemen who. And a lot of ladies these days who are profit from the arms sales and particularly from the chance to remake the world and it’s institutions the day the ceasefire is signed. That is the big plan. And if you want a really singing sort of one-liner from me at the end which I don’t tend to do but you ask for it is I have I’m fairly confident now that the cabal will pull out as rabbit like from its hat at some point what you can call alien 9/11. A mixture of exotic weapons and psychographic and holographic technology to tell us that the world’s been invaded by so-called aliens, and therefore we must unite under global government to advance said agenda.

Woes: Well okay! I will all right let’s go to David. Covid the last two years, the Great Reset, lockdowns, the vaccine, what does it all mean? What does it all represent? What has actually been going on here?

David Scott: Yeah Covid for this control it’s the actual disease. I don’t think it was manufactured. I think it’s real I think that the people who are saying that the germ theory of illnesses flawed have a point. But I don’t know exactly what the correction to the current theory should be. But I think the illness is real. It’s not particularly threatening for anyone who’s healthy. But it had a very, very good PR consultant. And it was elevated to be a major threat that it never was. And that’s given the government’s control unbelievable control we’ve seen it in Australia we’ve seen it in New Zealand the Anglo-Saxon countries the last bastions of liberty that we are have been amongst the worst not quite the worst but certainly amongst the worst for closing down their own populations the populations have mostly accepted it so far. And it’s given the it’s given the state a great deal of control and they will now do something with that control I’m not quite sure what. And it’s been clear to me that the spiritual aspect of this fight [85:01] is to get people to realize that their compliance is not virtue their compliance is cowardice.

Woes: Yeah. I would I’m not going to comment on that. But I would certainly agree with that last part. Brian would you like to give a summary of Covid in the last two years? What it represents? What it signifies?

Brian Garrish: Okay. Well, I also believe that the virus exists. I believe that the actual virus that we encountered had been interfered with by the human hand so I don’t regard it as being totally natural. I know there’s a lot of discussion about this and I’m also going to say there are some people who say well. Because the virus has never been what’s the term the correct term.

Alex Thompson: It’s never been isolated. Although the virologists say we can’t speak of isolation with viruses. But it’s all rough terms.

Brian Garrish: Well all I wanted to say is that there are some people who say:

“Well, you can’t even call it virus.”

I’m just gonna say I can accept I can see people get ill and I’m old enough to know that in the past people have got ill in a particular way and they feel really bad and they say they’ve got flu. And some vulnerable people elderly people with other underlying conditions can easily die if they get the thing called flu. So I’m going to say for me I accept this thing called flu exists. But I would agree with the comments that we’ve then seen this normal natural winter phenomena has been ramped up to literally frighten the pants off people. And on the back of that fear where we can show that the British government used a group of individuals trained in psychology the spy B team operate operating alongside it’s Covid sage team that spy B team were producing documents saying that the British government should ramp up fear in order to make people better, or dear to the policies that they wanted the lockdown policies. So that’s what I see with the background. But then what’s been the result of this. Well, we’ve seen people killed in very large numbers there is no doubt about this at all we have seen. I’m going to say hundreds of thousands of mainly elderly people, but not exclusively have died. And we’ve seen our society completely changed in that we have been locked in our own homes we’ve seen families divided against each other’s. We’ve seen families denied the opportunity to mix and carry on normal family loving family interactions and we’ve also seen society divided in a particularly callous and vicious way. And that is continuing under this latest scam that we’ve now got the moronic the omicon virus. We are back on this division of society so the vaccinated are frightened of the unvaccinated people. And we’re being told that if you’re not vaccinated you are a threat to society. So in the matter of a couple of years we’ve seen the most draconian lockdown of society in a way that I think back now to 20 years ago 30 years ago unbelievable! Where we’ve come to. People frightened to go out to the house you can’t go to the pub you can’t go to a gym you can’t go to a club. The government is controlling our lives down to who comes into our house.

So this is a huge, huge power grab but the bit that goes with it is the other policies that we see coming out of these globalistic think tanks such as the World Economic Forum, because alongside AI where AI and the AI algorithms the smart technology are going to run our lives. They’re also talking about the trans humanism agenda where they are working to change us from being human beings into Cyborgs, or the equivalent. And there’s no question that they’re doing it in the labs. This is reality so we’ll call it the hidden hand has now taken away basic freedoms it’s locked us down in a way which has made the majority of the country absolutely powerless through fear.

And then we can already see where this goes next the AI is coming in where [90:02] everybody is to be tracked and face scanned and fingerprinted wherever they move. Some people are saying the mark of the beast. And I think they’re not far off it. And then we are going to be denied the opportunity to be human beings in its true sense. We’ve even got an attack on men and women now it’s not right to say that there are men and there are women. So the agenda as you get into these larger policy areas I think is clearly demonic, or we could call it satanic. But whatever the mind is that’s created this situation in the world to me is utter evil. And we need to think about it in these terms. And we need to deal with it in these terms, because it is not just political policy this is not conservative policy, or Labour policy, or even global policy. This is so bad it must come from a mind which is demonic.

Woes: Yeah. I would echo that. I think that there is a sense of evil permeating all of this. When you see various examples various manifestations of what’s going on? Families being split apart families being artificially separated children not being allowed to cuddle their grandparents children being raised to be accustomed to distance between them and other people being paranoid about other people as a biological threat to you there are so many manifestations here. Yeah, I agree it is evil. You see the thing is I do I’m not against hierarchy. And I’m not even against the I’m not against the concept of authority. But I think that we need, you know, society and human beings deserve and need an elite that is humane and sane and kind kind-hearted. And I think that what we’re seeing here is an elite that is there’s anything but those things.

Just to end I think that people like us tend to be very good at finding problems and analyzing problems. But I think it would be good to end on some kind of positive advice. And David said earlier that compliance is not virtue it is cowardice. David I’ll ask you to expand on that. And then I’ll ask Brian and Alex to give their own just something of advice for people in the coming in the coming years.

David Scott: I think what this has done is this made resistance easy, because anything normal is resistant resistance anything that is not ruled by fear is resistance you go and you smile a neighbour you’re resisting you ask a question you resisted they don’t like questions they can’t answer them it’s very funny how things suddenly get reversed when well-placed questions start getting get in place. So much of what they do relies on their consent. The little bit at the end of the UK Column and silencers consent the so speaking out what we’ve got to do is going to learn learn to resist. And this is don’t accept lies don’t accept half truths. Question what’s been told to you have the confidence to use your own intelligence to see what appears right. And if it doesn’t keep asking questions the system doesn’t really cope well with that at all. So the ability to resist is much broader than it ever was. Because the tyranny is much more obvious than it ever was. We are planning on doing a lot of development in the UK Column in the next year since the Covid thing started we’ve gone from being what would you say I as a little organization run by dedication and not much else to organization that’s starting to look [95:01] like it’s reasonably well founded and looking to expand and looking to put a lot more content on so it’s enabled us to be followed lots of other people who are resisting this tyranny will be finding the same thing the new voices will be emerging support people who you’ve considered are telling the truth encourage them subscribe to them and remove your support from. Those who are lying to you. Don’t subscribe to the BBC! Don’t subscribe to the Guardian! Don’t do these things! And I’ll keep asking questions and the fight is out there. And it’s not far away you’ll find it quite quickly.

And if you can lose the fear and enjoy the process of resisting it becomes the world becomes a lot less frightening for a start very quickly and it becomes I wouldn’t quite say fun. But there’s certainly an element of comedy in it for sure. And you also find that you make an awful lot of very good friends you might lose some friends but you’ll make better ones than the ones you’ve lost right.

Alex Thompson: Our Russian lesson for the evening which means don’t believe! Don’t fear! And don’t request. Right that is the distilled wisdom of all the Soviet dissidents. And, in fact, it was quoted by an old mate of mine give orgratz when he appeared on UK Column from odessa recently and David went into detail on the communist injunction in the Bible fear not he just did. So in that little speech and he did so equally well in a blog you’ll find on UK Column.org if you search for it called fear not. Fear is pretty obvious to people of all religious persuasions and none as to why it’s a bad thing, because well in the Christian understanding it’s blocks out all the things that there should be such as fear of even of your creator and of your of those who really have authority over you. But the remedy in the Bible is that perfect love which means mature love by the way, rather than naive love the kind of love that says I must get jabby jaby to protect gran that’s naive love perfect love adult love casts out fear, or drives out fear. So people are aware of that it’s even in the culture through Frank Herbert’s dune, you know, fear is the mind killer it switches the mind off it turns you back to the reptilian brain. And all these things so that’s been well covered.

The other two which I’m astonished how regularly feature in all the best philosophical and religious writing from around the world from antiquity onwards is the other two should we see sources of problems that you can switch off, at this point, by constantly working on them are greed and pride! Pride, of course, is often referred to by the Greek word hubris Latin superbia. And both of these words express more than English pride does that’s the problem is not being genuinely proud of what you and your people have achieved but rather the problem is thinking of yourself more highly than you ought and this sets you up for a full pride goes before a fall. So if there’s any unexamined assumptions within yourself that I will just do fine, or I need to be in the lead and whatever then let that be knocked out of you, you know, we have a great time in sort of the fraternal atmosphere of UK Column, because without any kind of confrontation we managed to smooth each other’s rough edges by saying. You don’t want to be doing it that way my good fellow and that works just fine. So wherever you are. You need to be in a small team of people.

And as I was saying to some young Dutch people I was sitting around a table on Saturday with a dozen Dutch dissidents schooling them in this. And I said. Well, the first thing you do is go out in skirmishes together as we did when we were a small organization and enjoy your acquiring your battle scars and your wounds limp back home and have a post match confab with each other and say:

“Well, that was fun wasn’t it guys if it isn’t fun then you shouldn’t be in dissident work. Because the enemy can never enjoy what he does he doesn’t have any fun.”

So that’s you’ve always got one up on the enemy there. So engage in skirmishes see what worked well as a team what didn’t and tighten your game so that’s get rid of prize just be, you know, humble and the third one is pretty obvious to greed get rid of it in every sense that many traditions say you are a slave as many times as you have passions, or greeds, or desires so cut out the obvious ones the ones that plague modern life like porn addiction like addiction to the wrong kinds of food examine what it is that makes [100:00] you weak for these things the feeling of helplessness and emotional damage that comes before indulging in any habit. Turn that into a moment of meditation instead and say I can live without that if you’re a Christian but express say it with Paul in the words of colossians 3 for ye are dead and your life is hid with Christ in god. So if you can get that sorted out then the attitude is well they can have whatever that they can take off me. Because that’s not the real me. And if it comes to it if. It really does come to being carried off the camps god forbid. Learn from Solzhenitsyn and many others who lived through the totalitarianism that as he said. In one of his purple passages in the Gulag Archipelago how we burned in the camps that we hadn’t kicked and screamed when they came for us right. I am not advocating violence in any situation short of people coming to cart you away obviously not. But think of it this way anywhere you take your last stand, or live out your last date is going to be less comfortable than doing it on your own doorstep yeah. I’ll just put it that way but don’t let it come to that so don’t fear, or I’ll repeat the Russian phrase right believe not! Fear not! Request not.

Woes: Okay. Thank you. Brian would you like to give some closing thoughts.

Brian Garrish: Well, thank you for that it’s fascinating isn’t it when we get to this point. What’s in my mind is that just a little while ago we were trying to pin down who was causing the trouble. So we went up through the structure to the people we thought could be controlling the policy and we were looking up certainly at international banker level, but above that. And then we come to a little bit of a smoky area, because we realize that we can’t actually see the individuals that are really controlling this global totalitarian policy. We can’t see them and we can’t name them. And on one hand this makes the battle difficult, because you can’t easily fight an enemy that you can’t see, or you can’t detect.

But we get told something else why are they hidden. And the answer is very simply that they albeit that they’re extremely powerful extremely powerful they’re actually frightened of us, because if they weren’t frightened of us why would they need to be hidden? So the enemy we’re up against is very powerful, very strong in many ways. But ultimately we’re being told. And we can see very clearly that this enemy is frightened of ordinary people, because it hides it’s face.

And. So I think that the way we can fight back is so easy, because what do people like to do people love to talk. This is why mobile phones are so successful why social media is so successful people like to talk. But if we’re going to use that system to fight. Then we’ve got to focus on some simple things we’ve got to focus on truth. We’ve got to make sure that what we’re saying is true that that helps with personal relationships as it does with putting across perhaps a more political answer.

We’ve got a deal, in fact. And we’ve got a deal in evidence. So as long as we’re talking and interfacing with our fellow human being men and women. Then we’ve got to be accurate in what we talk about. But if we want to bring down this very powerful, very evil totalitarian regime we’ve got to be warning other people about it. And we’ve got to be showing them what’s happening. And we’ve got to be supporting and winning people over helping and comforting them.

So that’s a communication war and without mentioning any names there’s a channel which calls itself information wars and whatever you think of the individual running that. I’ve always thought what a brilliant name it was, because we are in an information war. And we can win that war, because we have the millions and billions of people world-wide on our side. And we easily easily outnumber the bad people that we can’t see.

So my advice is to talk. But when you talk and exchange ideas with other people you’ve got to be truthful you’ve got to deal with facts and evidence. And you’ve got to put across your ideas in a way that’s loving.

And. I’m going to say to the audience I’m still quite surprised to hear myself say [105:01] this, because if I’d gone back 20 plus years ago to my military time I would have imagined then I’d be talking more in terms of how many rounds we had, rather than saying we’ve actually got to use truth. And we’ve got to love one another. But we’re up against utter evil. If you want to fight evil then you’re going to have to turn to scriptures. And you’re going to have to deal in truth. And you’re going to have to treat your fellow man and fellow woman with due love and respect.

Woes: Okay. Thank you very much for that there was actually a question posted which is related to the military and I wasn’t sure how to fit it in but you’ve just mentioned the military. So I’ll bring it in here. And this is a quick question before we end. Is using the 77th brigade to propagandize Covid a ripping up of the principle of not turning the army against the British public.

Alex Thompson: Yes! Yes! America has the doctrine codified possible comitatus, but all common law countries have the same actually you cannot use troops in any common law constitution any English-speaking country’s constitution then they all the countries have them the government lies when it says they don’t. You cannot use the troops against the people. You’ve already forfeited your right to rule that way.

Woes: Oh that’s something for us all to bear in mind [Laughter] okay. Well thank you very much. I think this has been a really interesting and useful stream. So thank you very much UK Column.

Brian Garrish: Okay. Thank you.

David Scott: You’re very welcome.

Woes: Thank you very much. It’s been a real pleasure excellent. Well, thank you very much and i’ll be back in about 10 minutes with Survive the Jive in the meantime bye bye for now.

Brian Garrish: Okay bye-bye.

[106:55]

————

Millennial Woes has created many things. And this is your chance to own one of them! A unique piece of work hand crafted by the vile vlogger, to commemorate Millennial 2021.

Millenniyule 2021 commemoration

A hundred hours of highly skilled labour went into producing this animated vector graphic, which can be magnified to any size.

In the iconic Millennial Woes font, it glistens and responds to your touch. And at the centre of it all, a figure representative of 2021, the White Stag!

Symbolizing endurance, discovery, and rejuvenation!

This one-of-a-kind creation is up for sale as an NFT. Follow the link below. And it can be yours forever! This is your only chance!

[107:50]