[Part 17]

[Benton Bradberry’s 2012 book, “The Myth of German Villainy” is a  superb, must-read, revisionist look at how the German people have been systematically, relentlessly and most importantly, unjustly vilified as the arch criminal of the 20th century. Bradberry sets out, coolly and calmly as befits a former US-Navy officer and pilot, to show why and how the German people have been falsely accused of massive crimes and that their chief  accuser and tormentor, organized jewry is in fact the real party guilty of monstrous crimes against Germans and the rest of the world.

In Part 17, the lead-up to the German invasion of Poland is described and how Germany was provoked into that act by the Polish, who adopted a murderously belligerent and uncooperative policy towards Germany’s offers of a sensible solution to the Danzig and Polish Corridor issues.

Poland was encouraged in adopting that attitude because of the guarantees and promises made by the British and American war-mongers, such as Churchill, Halifax, Vansittart, Roosevelt and Bullitt who were acting as tools of International jewry to create another World War. This was engineered to finish what their World War I had not accomplished, that is, the complete crushing of Germany and its sovereignty.

Hitler, who knew first hand the horrors of armed conflict, never wanted a war, let alone a World War, yet was forced into one on the day that Britain and France, on the orders of international jewry, officially declared war on Germany on Sep 3, 1939 — KATANA.]

NOTE: The author has very generously given me permission to reproduce the material here — KATANA.

 The book can be bought at Amazon here: The Myth of German Villainy

The Myth of

German Villainy

by

Benton L. Bradberry

Contents

[Clicking on a link in the Contents here will take you to that Part, in a separate post]

[Part 01]

Preface

Chapter 1 – The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation

Germany’s Positive Image Changes Overnight

[Part 02]

Chapter 2 – Aftermath of the War in Germany

The Versailles Treaty

Effect of the Treaty on the German Economy

Was the War Guilt Clause Fair?

Did Germany Really Start the War?

[Part 03]

Chapter 3 – The Jewish Factor in the War

Jews at the Paris Peace Conference

Jews in Britain

[Part 04]

Chapter 4 – The Russian Revolution of 1917

Bolsheviks Take Control

Jews and the Russian Revolution

Origin of East European Jews

Reason for the Russian Pogroms Against the Jews

Jews Leave Russia for America

Financing the 1917 Revolution

Jews in the Government of Bolshevik Russia

[Part 05]

Chapter 5 – The Red Terror

Creation of the Gulag

Bolsheviks Kill the Czar

Jews as a Hostile Elite

The Ukrainian Famine (Holodomor)

[Part 06]

Chapter 6 – The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads Throughout Europe

Jews in the Hungarian Revolution

Miklos Horthy Saves Hungary

Jews in the German Revolution

The Spartacist Uprising in Berlin

Jewish Bolsheviks Attempt to Take Italy

Jewish Bolsheviks Attempt to Take Spain — The Spanish Civil War

Czechoslovakia in Danger of Communist Takeover

The Comintern’s Aim? World Domination!

[Part 07]

Chapter 7 – The Nation of Israel

History of the Expulsion of Jews

[Part 08]

Chapter 8 – Jews in Weimar Germany

Jews Undermine German Culture

[Part 09]

Chapter 9 – Hitler & National Socialists Rise to Power

The 25 Points of the National Socialist Party

[Part 10]

Chapter 10 – National Socialism vs. Communism

National Socialism

Jews Plan Marxist Utopia

[Part 11]

Chapter 11 – Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany

Text of Untermeyer’s Speech in New York

The Jewish Persecution Myth

Effect of Boycott on the German Economy

Jewish Exaggerations are Contradicted by Many

[Part 12]

Chapter 12 – The Nazis and the Zionists Actually Work Together for Jewish Emigration out of Germany

The Nuremberg Laws – 1935

The Zionist Movement

[Part 13]

Chapter 13 – Life in Germany Under Hitler

Night of the Long Knives

1934 Annual Nazi Rally at Nuremberg

Hitler Revives the German Economy

Hitler Becomes the Most Popular Leader in the World

[Part 14]

Chapter 14 – Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory

Chapter 15 – The 1936 Olympics

[Part 15]

Chapter 16 – “Anschluss”. The Unification of Austria and Germany

Austrian Economy Revived

Austria’s Jews

[Part 16]

Chapter 17 – Germany Annexes the Sudetenland

[Part 17]

Chapter 18 – War with Poland

The Polish Problem

Hitler’s Proposal to Poland

Kristallnacht

German-Polish Talks Continue

Jews Influence both Roosevelt and Churchill

British and American Political Leaders Under Jewish Influence

Roosevelt’s Contribution to Hostilities

Lord Halifax Beats the War Drums

Germany Occupies Bohemia and Moravia

Roosevelt Pushes for War

Anti-war Movement Becomes Active

Poles Murder German Nationals Within the Corridor

[Part 18]

Chapter 19 – The Phony War

Russo-Finnish War

The Norway/Denmark Campaign

German Invasion of Denmark and Norway

Churchill Takes Chamberlain’s Place as Prime Minister

[Part 19]

Chapter 20 – Germany invades France Through the Low Countries

The Phony War Ends.

Churchill the War Lover

The Fall of France

Hitler Makes Peace Offer to Britain

[Part 20]

Chapter 21 – The Allied Goal? Destruction of Germany!

[Part 21]

Chapter 22 – Germany as Victim

Rape and Slaughter

Jewish Vengeance

The Jewish Brigade

[Part 22]

Chapter 23 – Winners and Losers

Bibliography

Chapter 18

War with Poland 

The international jubilation over the peace pact between Prime Minister Chamberlain and Chancellor Hitler resulting from the Munich Agreement, did not last for long. Public opinion outside Germany soon began to cool again and turn against Hitler and the Nazis; the result of the relentless anti-Hitler, anti-Nazi propaganda. Propaganda is a powerful weapon and it was used to its fullest potential to turn public opinion against Nazi Germany, and to create pretexts for war, both in Britain and the United States. This hate campaign was controlled and managed mainly by the Jews who spared no effort to undermine the Nazi regime.

British historian Nesta Webster wrote in her book, Germany and England, published in 1938, shortly before World War II began:

“Britons in the past have not been easily worked up to hate, but this insane hatred of two men, Mussolini and Hitler, is being instilled in them by the Jews and those who benefit by them, and acting like a poison in the life blood of our people.

Germany is under a visible anti-Jewish dictatorship. We are under an invisible Jewish dictatorship, but a dictatorship that can be felt in every sphere of life, for no one can escape from it.

Already the Jews can make or break the career of any man as they please. Once war breaks out we cannot doubt that they will be found in every key position and will hold us at their mercy. Then the real purpose of the world war will become apparent. As long as the Jews do not hold Germany they can never realize their final aim – world domination. Therefore Hitler must be overthrown and Jewish power restored.” (emphasis added)

[Add. image] Nesta Webster’s booklet (33 pp), “Germany and England” (1938).

In this atmosphere of hate, distrust and bellicosity created by the anti-Hitler propaganda, the Western leaders were preconditioned to take the worst possible interpretation of any foreign policy initiative by Hitler. He had been made out to be an aggressive psychopath by the Jewish press and was therefore given no credit for having legitimate claims for Germany.

After the Munich conference, personal control of British foreign policy passed from Prime Minister Chamberlain to his Foreign Minister, Lord Halifax, who thereafter waged a relentless campaign to provoke a war with Germany. Halifax and certain British leaders on both the left and the right joined together to castigate Hitler and the Nazis and push for war. Principle among these was Sir Robert Vansittart, Chief Diplomatic Advisor to the British Government, who made anti-Nazi radio broadcasts.

[Add. image] Robert Gilbert Vansittart, (25 June 1881 – 14 February 1957), known as Sir Robert Vansittart between 1929 and 1941, was a senior British diplomat in the period before and during the Second World War. He was Principal Private Secretary to the Prime Minister from 1928 to 1930 and Permanent Under-Secretary at the Foreign Office from 1930 to 1938 and later served as Chief Diplomatic Adviser to the British Government. He is best remembered for his opposition to appeasement and his strong stance against Germany during and after the Second World War.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Vansittart,_1st_Baron_Vansittart

Vansittart’s radio broadcasts were intended to awake the British public to “The Nature of the Beast” ― to the habits of militarism, aggression and blind obedience which, according to Vansittart, had been inculcated into the Germans since the time of Tacitus, and which made them uniquely dangerous to their neighbors. Vansittart used the metaphor of the butcherbird he had observed years before on the Black Sea, ruthlessly eliminating its unsuspecting prey one by one. In Vansittart’s view, Nazism was no aberration but the logical outcome of German history. Vansittart and the others characterized each foreign policy move by Hitler as a new “surprise” and declared that he could not be trusted and had to be “stopped.” Vansittart’s broadcasts were very effective in inflaming British public opinion against Germany.

In reality, Hitler had made it clear from the beginning of his chancellorship that he intended to reclaim those territories taken away from Germany by the Versailles Treaty. His plan for a single German state that would include all Germans was also made clear from the beginning. “Ein Reich, ein volk, ein fuhrer,” (one country, one people, one leader) he repeated again and again. So far, he had remilitarized the Rhineland, annexed Austria, and annexed the Sudetenland ― all peacefully. The majority German city of Memel had also been returned to East Prussia from Lithuania. The only remaining pieces of the puzzle were Danzig and the Polish Corridor. It was obvious that they were next on the agenda. Hitler had already made that clear. But he also renounced any claim to the provinces of Alsace and Lorraine which had been returned to France at the end of World War I. Hitler stated his plan clearly and then followed that plan, step-by-step, precisely as he said he would do.

Moreover, numerous world statesmen, journalists and academics concurred with Hitler’s demand for reclamation of these German territories, and declared that his demands were both reasonable and just. The Versailles Treaty was based on the “War Guilt” clause which assigned blame for starting WWI to Germany. Revisionist historians had already disproved the war guilt allegation against Germany, so there was no longer any basis for the onerous terms of the Versailles Treaty and it should have been scrapped long before Hitler was elected to office. It was simply disingenuous for Churchill, Halifax, Vansittart, and the other members of the British “war party” to characterize Hitler’s moves as “aggression” or “surprises.” To say that his word could not be trusted was not true.

The Polish Problem

The Versailles Treaty had taken a large swath of German territory, along with its German inhabitants, to create the new sovereign state of Poland. This included a strip of land across Germany to give Poland access to the Baltic Sea, called the Polish Corridor. The main problem of the Corridor was that it split Germany in two, separating East Prussia from the rest of Germany. For Germans to travel back and forth between East Prussia and the rest of Germany, they were required to go around the Corridor by ship. They were not allowed to cross the Corridor. The German City of Danzig had also been taken from Germany and placed under the supervision of the League of Nations as a “free city” for the purpose of providing Poland with her port facilities. Around one and a half million ethnic Germans now lived as second class citizens in this Polish controlled territory.

This territory, along with its residents, had been German for centuries and its people made it clear from the start through countless mass demonstrations that they did not want to be separated from Germany. Danzig had been a member of the old Hanseatic League, and was one of the most German of German cities. It’s population was 96 percent German, and in a plebiscite they voted overwhelmingly to be returned to Germany. The ethnic Germans living in this region were now a minority in a hostile Polish state, under Polish rule, and suffered the same kind of discrimination and repression that the Germans had suffered in the Sudetenland. Germany had a just claim for the return of all of the territory taken from it by force by the Versailles Treaty, and many world leaders openly acknowledged that. A prominent British authority on Germany and German affairs, William Harbutt Dawson, wrote in “Germany Under the Treaty,” 1933:

“… no factor in the life of Europe today offers so grave and certain a menace to peace than the Corridor, which cuts Germany into two parts, and severs Danzig, one of the most German of cities, from the fatherland. Can Europe afford to ignore this menace and allow matters to drift? To do so would be tantamount to inviting and hastening catastrophe, for instead of improving, the conditions in the Corridor after and because of 12 years of Polish occupation, are steadily growing worse.

Because it is now abundantly clear that all the needs of Polish trade, present and future, can be satisfied without the corridor, and because good relations between Germany and Poland, which are so essential to the settlement of peace in Europe, will be impossible so long as that political monstrosity continues. The greater part of the territory should go back to the country to which it owes its civilization.”

Halifax and the “war party,” however, refused to acknowledge the justification of Germany’s claims, and characterized each of Hitler’s revanchist actions as naked aggression and proof of his intent to take over the world. They claimed that he even had designs on Britain itself. There was no basis in fact for either of these claims. President Roosevelt was at the same time, preposterously warning the American people of a possible German invasion of the United States through South America.

Hitler’s Proposal to Poland

Poland had traditionally harbored hostile feelings towards Germany and for all German people, so Hitler proceeded with caution in attempting to settle this last territorial dispute. He was moderate in his approach and displayed considerable generosity in recognizing Polish interests. British Ambassador to Berlin, Sir Neville Henderson, acknowledged Hitler’s reasonable approach.

“Of all the Germans,” Henderson said, “believe it or not, Hitler is the most moderate as far as Danzig and the Corridor are concerned.”

On October 24, 1938, Hitler had his foreign minister, von Ribbentrop, propose the following four step plan to Polish Ambassador Lipski that would have rectified the injustices of the Versailles Treaty and which should also have eliminated all sources of friction between Poland and Germany.

1.) The return of the Free City of Danzig to the Reich, but without severance of its economic ties to the Polish State. This offer would guarantee to Poland free port privileges in the city of Danzig, as well as extra-territorial access to the harbor.

2.) Germany would make no demand for the return of its former territory, now called the Polish Corridor, but Germany should be allowed to build a highway and a railroad across the Polish Corridor in order to reunite Germany with East Prussia.

3.) Mutual recognition of the location of the borders between Germany and Poland would be permanently settled. In other words, Germany would not demand return of any remaining territory ceded to Poland by the Versailles Treaty.

4.) The German-Polish Pact of 1934 would be extended from ten to twenty-five years. (In the German-Polish Pact of 1934, both countries pledged to resolve their problems through bilateral negotiations and to forgo armed conflict for a period of 10 years. The pact effectively normalized relations between Poland and Germany, which were previously strained by border disputes arising from the Treaty of Versailles.)

In his negotiations with Poland, Hitler could not have been more reasonable.

Kristallnacht

[Add. image] Jewish shops damaged during “Kristaslnacht”.

While these negotiations were going on an unfortunate event known as “Kristasllnacht” (night of broken glass) occurred in Germany which had the effect of further turning international public opinion against Germany. It could not have occurred at a worse time. The trigger for Kristalnacht was the murder of the German diplomat, Ernst vom Rath, in Paris by a young Jewish man named Herschel Grynszpan, on November 9, 1938. Grynszpan’s family, along with approximately 15,000 other Jews who had entered Germany from Poland after 1914, and who were not German citizens, had been expelled out of Germany back to Poland on October 27, 1938. Seventeen year old Herschel Grynszpan, who was living in Paris with an uncle at the time, shot and killed vom Rath inside the German Embassy in revenge for the deportations, though vom Rath personally had nothing to do with it. News of the murder was in all the German papers.

Anti-Jewish feeling was already running high as a result of the Jewish “holy war” against Germany, and the German people reacted angrily over vom Rath’s murder. On the nights of November 9 and 10, gangs of youths roamed through the Jewish neighborhoods breaking windows of Jewish businesses and homes and setting fire to synagogues. Uniformed SA men also participated. The official German position on these events was that these were spontaneous outbursts of angry German citizens over the murder of a German diplomat by a Jew, but the international Jewish press accused Nazi officials, specifically Goebbels, of orchestrating the event.

That seems doubtful, however, because early in the morning following the Kristallnacht events, Dr. Goebbels announced in a radio broadcast that any action against Jews was strictly prohibited and warned of severe penalties for disobeying this order. Numerous people were also arrested for violence against Jews. Government and Nazi Party officials were furious over what had happened because of the negative propaganda against Germany which would obviously follow. Hitler was also furious when he first heard about it and ordered a telex message to be sent to all Gauleiter offices, which read:

“By express order from the very highest authority, arson against Jewish businesses or other property must in no case and under no circumstances take place.”

Unfavorable international reaction was impossible to avoid, and popular opinion of Nazi Germany declined dramatically as a result of Kristallnacht. The British historian, Martin Gilbert, himself a Jew, writes that;

“no event in the history of German Jews between 1933 and 1945 was so widely reported as it was happening, and the accounts from the foreign journalists working in Germany sent shock waves around the world.”

The Times of London wrote at the time:

“No foreign propagandist bent upon blackening Germany before the world could outdo the tale of burnings and beatings, of blackguardly assaults on defenseless and innocent people, which disgraced that country yesterday.”

There was no need to exaggerate what had happened. The violent rampage against Germany’s Jews was truly a disgrace. But in typical fashion, the international Jewish press did exaggerate the event out of all proportion to what actually happened, providing their usual “eye witness” accounts. An orgy of brutal beatings, rapes, and murder of large numbers of innocent Jews all across Germany, as well as extensive damage to Jewish property was alleged. These exaggerated reports had the effect of poisoning international public opinion against Germany, as they were intended to do. Yet, it makes no sense that the German government or the Nazi Party could have orchestrated this pogrom, as the negative publicity resulting from it hurt Germany and the Nazis far more than it did the Jews. Already sensitive to the hysterical anti-Nazi propaganda campaign being waged against them, German officials were being very careful not to create incidents, such as Kristallnacht, for which they could be criticized further. It is more likely that Kristallnacht was a spontaneous pogrom against the Jews, caused by the buildup of hostility over the International Jewish “holy” war against Germany, and triggered by the vom Rath murder.

[Add. image] A New York Times headline.

In the aftermath of Kristallnacht, the world press became overwhelmingly sympathetic to the Jews, and bitterly hostile towards Germany. In France, Britain and the United States, calls for war against Germany became increasingly bellicose as a result of Kristallnacht.*

[*] [For an alternative view on who was behind Kristallnacht please see: The Bizarre Story of Kristallnacht – Part 1 ]

German-Polish Talks Continue

On January 5, 1939, Poland’s Foreign Minister, Josef Beck, met with Hitler at Berchtesgaden. Hitler reiterated to Beck a clear and definite guarantee that Germany would make no claims on the Polish Corridor, and reaffirmed that he only wanted to build a railroad and a highway across it. The following day, January 6th, in a meeting with Polish officials in Munich, von Ribbentrop confirmed Germany’s willingness to guarantee, not only the Corridor, but all Polish territory. This friendly, generous offer was repeated again by von Ribbentrop during a state visit to Warsaw on January 23, 1939. During this state visit von Ribbentrop appealed for a final all-inclusive settlement of German-Polish territorial points of contention.

A settlement in accord with the “four points” outlined above would have taken nothing away from Poland. Danzig was not a Polish city, but a “free city,” supervised by the League of Nations. Germany’s four point offer would have permitted Poland to continue to use Danzig’s port facilities, as before. Germany did not demand a return of its lost territory, now known as the Polish Corridor, only the right to build a highway and a railroad across it in order to reconnect with East Prussia. There was nothing unreasonable in Germany’s demands.

Yet, on March 21, 1939 French President LeBrun and British Prime Minister Chamberlain met in London and proposed a French-British-Polish alliance to contain Germany. This proposal was then sent on to Polish officials, which had the effect of further steeling their resistance to Hitler’s demands. Despite Germany’s best diplomatic efforts, the Poles were now refusing to concede anything.

The popular view today is that an overwhelmingly powerful Germany was threatening and intimidating a weak and impotent Poland, but in reality, that was hardly the case. Poland had a long military tradition and maintained a powerful, well trained army. The Polish army had only recently (1920) defeated the Russian “Red” army. Polish military leaders were not in the least intimidated by the power of Germany. It should be remembered that German armed forces had been reduced to only 100,000 men by the Versailles Treaty, and that Germany at the time of the crisis with Poland was still in the process of rebuilding her military forces. Not only was Poland not intimidated by Germany, she was even belligerent.

These Polish tanks were the equal of anything in the German army.

[Add. image] The Polish tank TP-7, 9 ton.

In October 1930, the influential Polish newspaper, Die Liga der Grossmacht, carried the following declaration:

“A struggle between Poland and Germany is inevitable. We must prepare ourselves for it systematically. Our goal is a new Grunewald (The Battle of Tannenberg on July 15th, 1410 when the Teutonic Knights were defeated). However, this time a Grunewald in the suburbs of Berlin.”

“That is to say, the defeat of Germany must be produced by Polish troops in the centre of the territory in order to strike Germany to the heart. Our ideal is a Poland with the Oder and the Neisse as a border in the West. Prussia must be re-conquered for Poland, and indeed, Prussia as far as the Spree.”

“In a war with Germany there will be no prisoners and there will be room neither for human feelings nor cultural sentiments. The world will tremble before the German-Polish War. We must evoke in our soldiers a superhuman mood of sacrifice and a spirit of merciless revenge and cruelty.”

At around the same time, Poland’s Marshall Rydz-Smigly said:

“Poland wants war with Germany and Germany will not be able to avoid it even if she wants to.”

 

Edvard Rydz-Smigly, Marshall of Poland

Jews Influence Both Roosevelt and Churchill

As the result of restrictions placed on them in Nazi Germany, Jews involved in theater and the movie business left Germany en masse for Hollywood where they were quickly made welcome by the Jews who ran the motion picture industry. These German émigré Jews then joined the Hollywood Jews in making anti-Nazi movies (usually with pro-Communist undertones) for American audiences. The stereotype Nazi officer, complete with monocle, cigarette holder, arch aristocratic manner, impeccable uniform, erect, arrogant bearing, and an evil sneer or a sinister smile on his haughty face, became a stock character in these movies.

[Add. image] The stereotypical Nazi officer as portrayed by Hollywood Jews.

The mass information and entertainment media in Britain and the United states was almost entirely under Jewish control, so a very one-sided picture of events in Germany was presented to the British and American people. Hitler and the members of his Nazi government were relentlessly smeared as guttersnipes, murderers and psychopaths, in total contradiction of the actual facts, thus public opinion in both countries was turned against Nazi Germany.

In 1940 and 1941 appeared Jewish made, pro-war films such as Charlie Chaplin’s burlesque of Hitler and Mussolini, The Great Dictator, as well as Man Hunt, directed by German Jewish émigré Fritz Lang, The Mortal Storm, A Yank in the R.A.F., Sergeant York, I Married a Nazi and numerous other such movies. These movies were an integral part of the vigorous campaign by various elements to get the United States into a war with Germany.

Once the United States was at war with Germany, the studios churned out one anti-Nazi potboiler after another. An audience today is likely to snicker at such “classics” as Hillbilly Blitzkrieg, Women in Bondage, The Devil with Hitler, I Escaped from the Gestapo, Hitler’s Children, That Nazi Nuisance, Strange Death of Adolf Hitler, Enemy of Women, Hitler’s Madman, The Master Race, The Hitler Gang, Hotel Berlin and Tarzan Triumphs.

[Add. image] Posters for Tarzan Triohphie Des Nazis and Tarzan Triumps starring Johnny Weissmuller. Storyline: “Zandra, white princess of a lost civilization, comes to Tarzan for help when Nazis invade the jungle with plans to conquer her people and take their wealth. Tarzan, the isolationist, becomes involved after the Nazis shoot at him and capture Boy: “Now Tarzan make war!””

A summary of the plot of Tarzan Triumphs will illustrate the flavor of these potboilers. Nazi agents parachute into Tarzan’s peaceful kingdom and occupy a fortress, hoping to exploit oil and tin. Johnny Weissmuller, a slightly flabby but still commanding noble savage, rallies his natives (all of whom are white) against the Axis. “Kill Nadzies!” Tarzan commands the natives. They nod eagerly. The Germans are so despicable even the animals turn against them. Tarzan chases the head of the Nazi troops into the jungle, and, just as the fear-crazed German officer frantically signals Berlin on his shortwave radio, Tarzan kills him. In Berlin the radio operator recognizes the distress signal and rushes out to summon the general in charge of the African operation. While Tarzan, Boy, and Jungle Priestess laughingly look on, Cheetah the chimp chatters into the microphone of the transmitter. Ignorant of the fatal struggle in the jungle depths, the general hears the chimp on the radio, jumps to his feet, salutes, and yells to his subordinates that they are listening not to Africa but to Der Führer.

The roles of the sadistic, sex-crazed, bullet-headed, Nazi “Krauts” in these Jewish made anti-German movies were played by such Hollywood “heavies” as George Siegman, Erich von Stroheim, Walter Long and Hobart Bosworth. Actor Bobby Watson was kept busy throughout the war playing the part of Adolf Hitler.

The American public, inundated with this kind of anti-German propaganda, was brainwashed to hate Germany and the German people. Anything our brave and noble armed forces could do to them was less than they deserved. Bomb their cities, kill their women and children. But destroy evil Germany by all means possible!

British and American Political Leaders

Under Jewish Influence

The political leaders in both Britain and America were also under the controlling influence of the Jews. Both Roosevelt and Churchill had surrounded themselves with Jewish advisors, to the exclusion of almost anyone else, and relied on Jewish money to support their campaigns for office. Jews were 2% of the American population, but of the 15 members of Roosevelt’s “Brain Trust,” 8 of them were Jews. The Jews therefore had control of the political leaders of both Britain and America, as well as control of public opinion in both countries.

A partial list of Jews surrounding FDR included: Bernard Baruch, Felix Frankfurter, David E. Lilienthal, David Niles, Louis Brandeis, Samuel I. Rosenman, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Benjamin V. Cohen, Rabbi Stephen Wise, Francis Perkins, Sidney Hillman, Herbert H. Lehman, Jesse I. Straus, Harold J. Laski, Charles E. Wyzanski, Samuel Untermyer, Edward Filene, David Dubinsky, Mordecai Ezekiel, Abe Fortus, Isador Lubin, Harry Dexter White (Weiss), David Weintraub, Nathan G. Silvermaster, Harold Glasser, Irving Kaplan, Solomon Adler, Benjamin Cardozo, Anna Rosenberg, …and numerous, numerous others, almost to the exclusion of Gentile advisors.

As a consequence, Roosevelt was enveloped in a milieu of Jewish hate and hostility for Germany, to the extent that he eventually became a part of it himself, habitually making malicious anti-Hitler and anti-Nazi remarks in public. These indiscreet public remarks by Roosevelt foreclosed any possibility of amicable diplomatic relations between Nazi Germany and the United States.

Moreover, these Jews were, to a man, sympathetic to Stalin and the Communists and acted essentially as the Soviet Union’s agents within the American government. These Communist leaning Jews proliferated in every branch of Roosevelt’s government and spied routinely for the benefit of the Soviets. Roosevelt warmly regarded Joseph Stalin and referred to him as “Uncle Joe.”

Churchill likewise surrounded himself with Jewish advisors. Churchill enjoyed living high on the hog though he had very little money. He was accused more than once during his long career of taking Jewish money in exchange for advocacy of policies which favored them. Churchill supplemented his salary as a public servant by writing as a journalist and by writing books, though these combined amounts were inadequate to finance his lavish life style. During his “wilderness years,” as he called them, between 1930 and 1939 when he was out of government, though still a Member of Parliament, Churchill was supported by a slush fund set up by a secret anti-German pressure group known as “The Focus.” Focus membership was composed of wealthy British Jews, like Sir Robert Mond, a directory of several chemical firms, and Sir Robert Waley-Cohen, the managing director of Shell Oil, who employed Churchill as their Gentile front man. The American Jew Bernard Baruch also made significant contributions to Churchill’s well being. Churchill’s assigned task was to fight Germany; to start warning the world about Nazi Germany. Churchill was a brilliant orator and a superb writer, and he did his job splendidly.

Jewish money, primarily through “The Focus,” paid for Churchill’s lavish life style, got him into the British cabinet, and eventually made him Prime Minister. From his position as a Member of Parliament, and subsequently as a member of the cabinet, Churchill, doing the bidding of The Focus, began loudly and belligerently berating Nazi Germany and sternly criticized first Stanley Baldwin’s and then Neville Chamberlain’s alleged blindness to the threat to Britain posed by Nazi Germany. He began to clamor for war. Both Roosevelt and Churchill became Gentile front men in international Jewry’s war on Germany.

A German Cartoon of Winston Churchill, depicting him as the paid front man of the Jews. In fact, he was paid lavishly by the Jewish group called “The Focus.”

[Add. image] The two faces of the jewish controlled Churchill.

Churchill, in a speech before the House of Commons on October 5, 1938, said:

“…but there can never be friendship between the British democracy and the Nazi power, that Power which spurns Christian ethics, which cheers its onwards course by a barbarous paganism, which vaunts the spirit of aggression and conquest, which derives strength and perverted pleasure from persecution, and uses, as we have seen with pitiless brutality the threat of murderous force.”

He was, of course, only repeating the super-heated, hysterical exaggerations and outright lies of international Jewish propaganda against Nazi Germany.

Contrary to Churchill’s warnings, Germany had no designs on Britain, whatever. Hitler actively sought an alliance with Britain, which the British rejected. Hitler even offered to provide German military assistance if it were ever needed to protect Britain. Hitler believed, and often stated, that the British Empire, and the Catholic Church, were international institutions which were absolutely essential to world peace and to world stability. Hitler was an open Anglophile who yearned to be accepted by the British and did everything he could to forge an alliance between Britain and Germany. He often said, as many British did also, that the British and German peoples were the same race; the same people actually, divided only by language. Hitler wanted only peace and friendship with Britain.

Hitler was dismayed by the steady stream of invective and hate propaganda directed at Germany by these British war mongers. In a speech given in Saarbrucken on October 9, 1938 he said:

“…All it would take would be for Mr. Duff Cooper or Mr. Eden or Mr. Churchill to come to power in England instead of Chamberlain, and we know very well that it would be the goal of these men to immediately start a new world war. They do not even try to disguise their intents, they state them openly…”

In the post-World War II world, Churchill has become almost God-like in the common mythology about the war, but the common mythology is so far from the truth that even an ardent Churchill sympathizer, Gordon Craig, felt obligated to write:

“It is reasonably well-known today that Churchill was often ill-informed, that his claims about German strength were exaggerated and his prescriptions impractical, that his emphasis on air power was misplaced.”

In “Rethinking Churchill,” 1998, Dr. Ralph Raico wrote:

“For all the claptrap about Churchill’s “far-sightedness” during the 30s in opposing the “appeasers,” in the end the policy of Chamberlain’s government to rearm as quickly as possible, while testing the chances for peace with Germany was more realistic than Churchill’s.”

Roosevelt’s Contribution to Hostilities

The attitude of President Roosevelt and his entourage toward Germany was even more extreme than that of the British leaders. Roosevelt was predisposed from the beginning of his career in public office to a deep antipathy for the German people in general, probably stemming from the anti-German propaganda of WWI, and there is no doubt that he personally despised Adolf Hitler. According to Professor David L. Hoggan (“The Forced War” – 1961):

“Roosevelt’s hatred for Hitler was deep, vehement, passionate ― almost personal. This was due in no small part to an abiding envy and jealousy rooted in the great contrast between the two men, not only in their personal characters but also in their records as national leaders.”

The public lives of Roosevelt and Hitler had many similarities. Both assumed the leadership of their respective countries at the beginning of 1933 and then proceeded down parallel tracks. They both faced the enormous challenge of mass unemployment during a catastrophic worldwide economic depression. Each became a powerful leader in a vast military alliance during the most destructive war in history, albeit on opposite sides. Both men died while still in office within a few weeks of each other in April 1945. Though there were many similarities, the contrasts in their lives were enormous.

Roosevelt was born into one of the wealthiest families in America, and his life was completely free of economic worry. He, like Hitler, served in the First World War, but in an entirely different way. Roosevelt spent the war in an office in Washington as Under Secretary of the Navy. Hitler was born into a provincial family and grew up in semi-poverty. As a young man he worked as a manual laborer and lived hand-to-mouth. He served in the First World War as a front line soldier in the hell of the Western Front, never higher in rank than corporal. He was wounded several times and was decorated for bravery.

Despite his Ivy League education, his confident, aristocratic manner and persuasive rhetoric, Roosevelt was unable to solve the enormous economic problems existing in the United State which he inherited when he became president. Throughout his presidency, he was never able to reduce unemployment or to get the economy moving again. At the end of his first four years as president, millions of people remained unemployed, undernourished and poorly housed in a country rich in all the resources required for incomparable prosperity. Roosevelt’s New Deal was plagued from beginning to end with bitter strikes and bloody clashes between labor and industry.

The story unfolded very differently in Germany under Hitler. When Hitler became Chancellor, he was faced with all the problems facing Roosevelt, multiplied many times over. Yet, Hitler rallied his people behind a radical program that transformed Germany within a few years from an economically ruined land on the verge of civil war, into Europe’s powerhouse. Germany underwent a social, cultural and economic rebirth without parallel in history.

The contrast between the personalities of the two men was also stark. Hitler tended to be straightforward in his relationship with others and unambiguous in communicating his intentions. He had a conservative sense of Christian morality and was not a liar. Roosevelt put on a front of bon homme, but behind the big smile he was devious and calculating, and he manipulated others by misleading them. He was very probably a sociopath, devoid of a conscience, as many successful politicians are.

Hitler, on the other hand, was truly a man of the people who genuinely wished to elevate the German people out of their “slough of despond” to the realization of their full potential as a people and as a nation.

In contrast to Hitler, there was much of the cynical politician in Roosevelt who may have cared about the people in an abstract way, but he believed that only he knew what was best for them and that they were incapable of understanding such matters themselves. He manipulated the American people through devious and deceitful means, such as lying about his true intentions about taking America to war. He even admitted his devious and contradictory nature. He once said:

“I never let my left hand know what my right hand is doing.”

Roosevelt had worked in the Wilson administration during the First World War and was impressed by Wilson’s boundless idealism, and also by the way he was idolized by people around the world for his high-minded approach to the peace settlement after the war. Like Wilson before him, Roosevelt had an exaggerated, messianic view of himself as uniquely qualified for national leadership, and believed that he had been called upon by providence to reshape the world. He was convinced, as so many American leaders have been, that the world could be saved only by remodeling itself after the United States. Presidents like Wilson and Roosevelt, and George W. Bush most recently, view the world not as a multiplicity of different nations, races, and cultures who must mutually respect each others’ separate collective identities in order to live together in peace. They look at the world from a self righteous missionary perspective which divides the nations of the world into two groups ― those representing “good” on one side (our side), and those representing “evil” on the other (This is known as a “Manichean” world perspective.). They also see America as providentially ordained as the permanent leader of the forces of “good” in the world, with the mission of either destroying or converting the forces of “evil.” (Luckily, this view just happens to correspond to the economic and political interests of those who wield power in the United States.) Nazi Germany, in Roosevelt’s view, represented the forces of “evil,” with whom normal relations were impossible, and with whom one could not even reason; and so, he refused to try. He regarded Nazi Germany with total hostility.

Roosevelt most certainly did not see himself as an evil man, though his actions certainly made him one. He sincerely believed that he was doing the right and noble thing in pressuring Britain and France into a war against “evil” Germany. He was St. Michael the archangel leading the world in an existential struggle against the forces of Satan. The result of his vision of himself as the leader of the forces of righteousness, and his view of Germany under the Nazis as the force of evil in the world constantly threatening the forces of righteousness, produced an atmosphere of war hysteria and war psychosis among those who surrounded him and who ran his administration, to the extent that any utterance or action of this “force of evil,” that is, Nazi Germany, was given the worst possible interpretation, and evil designs were imputed to them however benign their actual intentions. The Jews who surrounded him and advised him, and who hated Hitler’s Germany for their own reasons, fed Roosevelt’s delusions about himself and his role in the world, and validated his Manichean view of the world.

To illustrate the war psychosis which had seized American political leaders during this time, Assistant Secretary of State F.B. Sayre exclaimed to British Ambassador Sir Ronald Lindsay on September 9, 1938;

“…at such a time, when war is threatening and Germany is pounding at our gates, it seems to me tragic that we have not been able to reach and sign an agreement [against Germany].”

To imagine Germany “pounding at the gates” of America in 1938 was totally absurd. Germany lacked the means to pound at the gates of Britain, just across the English Channel. Moreover, Hitler and the Nazis had no motive or reason in 1938 to view America with hostility; only with dismay at America’s baseless bellicosity towards Germany. If anything, it was the United States “pounding at the gates” of Germany.

In this atmosphere of false urgency, America’s Jewish secretary of the Treasury, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., telephoned the Jewish French President, Leon Blum, and suggested freezing German bank accounts in France, in hopes of pushing France into war with Germany. Roosevelt, himself, became increasingly belligerent towards Hitler, and repeatedly made personally insulting remarks about him in public. (Rather like the current war hysteria over Iran, but more extreme.)

William C. Bullitt was the American Ambassador to France at the time, as well as Ambassador at Large to all other European countries. Like Roosevelt, Bullitt “rose from the rich.” He was born into a wealthy Philadelphia banking family and was descended from Jonathan Horwitz, a German Jew who had immigrated to America. Bullitt was especially close to Roosevelt and shared Roosevelt’s enthusiasm for “Uncle Joe” (Stalin) and the Soviet Union, as well as his enthusiasm for war with Germany. Bullitt was used by Roosevelt to transmit messages to other American Ambassadors, including Joseph P. Kennedy, Ambassador to London (father of President John Kennedy), and Anthony Biddle, Ambassador to Warsaw, and those messages consistently expressed Roosevelt’s belligerence towards Germany.

In 1919 Bullitt was an assistant to President Wilson at the Versailles Peace Conference. That same year, Bullitt was sent to Russia to meet with Lenin to determine if the new Bolshevik government deserved recognition by the Allies. Bullitt was impressed with what he saw in Bolshevik Russia, and upon his return to Washington, urged recognition of the new regime. He was very sympathetic to Communist aims. In 1923 Bullitt married Louise Bryant Reed, the widow of American Communist leader John Reed (The movie, “Reds,” starring Warren Beatty, 1981, was about John Reed). When Roosevelt became president in 1933, he brought Bullitt back into diplomatic service. Throughout his career, Roosevelt had consistently maintained close relations with people who were either Communists or Communist sympathizers. In 1938, all U.S. envoys in Europe were subordinated to Bullitt who was based in Paris. Roosevelt bypassed the State Department and frequently spoke with Bullitt directly by telephone, often daily, giving him precisely detailed and ultra-confidential instructions on how to conduct America’s foreign policy.

Bullitt had access to Roosevelt by telephone at any hour of the day or night. Roosevelt and Bullitt were close friends and saw eye to eye on all foreign policy issues, and were especially in consonance in their hostility to Germany. Both were aristocrats and thorough internationalists with a shared view on how to remake the world, and both saw themselves as destined to bring about that grand reorganization. In Europe, Bullitt spoke with the voice and the authority of President Roosevelt himself.

President Roosevelt riding in a car with his “agent provocateur” Ambassador William C. Bullitt

The Polish Ambassador to Washington, Count Jerzy Potocki, reported back to Warsaw that William C. Bullitt had informed him that President Roosevelt was determined to bring America into the next European war. Bullitt predicted that a long war would soon break out in Europe.

“Of Germany and her Chancellor, Adolf Hitler, he [Bullitt] spoke with extreme vehemence and with bitter hatred,”

Potocki reported:

“He [Bullitt] suggested that the war might last six years, and he advocated that it should be fought to a point where Germany could never recover.”

 

[Add. image] William Christian Bullitt, Jr. (January 25, 1891 – February 15, 1967) United States Ambassador to the Soviet Union, 21 November 1933 – 16 May 1936. United States Ambassador to France, 1936–1940. Bullitt was born to a prominent, well-to-do Philadelphia family, the son of Louisa Gross (Horwitz) and William Christian Bullitt, Sr. 

Potocki asked Bullitt how such a war might begin, since it was very unlikely that Germany would attack either France or Britain. Bullitt said that it would likely begin with a war between Germany and some other country, and that the Western Powers would then intervene against Germany. Bullitt predicted an eventual war between Germany and the Soviet Union, which Germany would probably win, but would then be so worn out that it would have to capitulate to the Western Powers. Bullitt assured Potocki that the United States would participate in any such war if Britain and France made the first move. When Bullitt asked about the German-Polish problem, Potocki said that Poland would fight rather than give in to German demands, and Bullitt and Roosevelt were both encouraging Poland in this stance. Potocki attributed the belligerent American attitude toward Germany solely to Jewish influence. He reported to Warsaw again and again that American public opinion was merely the product of Jewish manipulation.

In a report from Washington back to the Foreign Ministry in Warsaw, dated February 9, 1939, he wrote:

“The pressure of the Jews on President Roosevelt and on the State Department is becoming ever more powerful …

… The Jews are right now the leaders in creating a war psychosis which would plunge the entire world into war and bring about general catastrophe. This mood is becoming more and more apparent.

In their definition of democratic states, the Jews have also created real chaos: they have mixed together the idea of democracy and communism and have above all raised the banner of burning hatred against Nazism.

This hatred has become a frenzy. It is propagated everywhere and by every means: in theaters, in the cinema, and in the press. The Germans are portrayed as a nation living under the arrogance of Hitler which wants to conquer the whole world and drown all of humanity in an ocean of blood.

In conversations with Jewish press representatives I have repeatedly come up against the inexorable and convinced view that war is inevitable. This international Jewry exploits every means of propaganda to oppose any tendency towards any kind of consolidation and understanding between nations. In this way, the conviction is growing steadily but surely in public opinion here that the Germans and their satellites, in the form of fascism, are enemies who must be subdued by the ‘democratic world.’ ”

Lord Halifax Beats the War Drums

Britain’s Foreign Minister, Lord Halifax, continued to maintain a hostile attitude toward Hitler and Germany, and was determined to provoke a war with Germany. He circulated rumors both at home and abroad which presented the foreign policy of Hitler in the worst possible light. He would have found fault with Hitler no matter which direction he turned or what he did. Halifax dispatched a message to President Roosevelt on January 24, 1939 in which he claimed to have received;

“a large number of reports from various reliable sources which throw a most disquieting light on Hitler’s mood and intentions.”

He falsely claimed that Hitler harbored a fierce hatred for Great Britain. Hitler had, in fact, consistently expressed only admiration for Great Britain and had pursued a goal of Anglo-German cooperation. Regardless, Halifax continued to claim the opposite. Halifax claimed that Hitler wanted to establish an independent Ukraine, and that he intended to destroy the Western Powers in a surprise attack before moving Eastward. He claimed that not only British intelligence but “highly placed Germans who are anxious to prevent this crime” had furnished him evidence of this evil conspiracy. No German had furnished any such thing to him. He made it up. Hitler had not the remotest intention of attacking either Great Britain or France.

Churchill and Halifax were determined to have a war with Germany.

How to explain the desire of these men to have a war with Germany? These men, Churchill, Halifax, Cooper, Eden, Vansittart, et al, were conservative men devoted to the British Empire and to its dominant position in the world. But they were also nervously aware that British power was waning. Churchill had been one of the most vocal advocates for war against Germany before World War I. He, and the others, were now advocating war with Germany for the same reason as before ― Germany was becoming too powerful, both commercially and militarily, and therefore threatened to eclipse the dominance of the British Empire.

These conservative British leaders were devoted to the old balance of power principle worked out after the Napoleonic Wars. Preventing any one power from becoming dominant on the European continent had always been an overriding foreign policy principle of Great Britain.

Germany’s defeat in a war would serve the interests of both Britain and International Jewry. Vilifying Hitler and deliberately misinterpreting his actions and intentions served only as pretexts for a war they were determined to bring about for their own reasons. These advocates of war with Germany were well aware that Britain could not defeat Germany without bringing the United States in on her side, as in World War I. At the same time that they were developing pretexts for war against Germany, they were propagandizing President Roosevelt to make sure he was behind them, though little propaganda was needed, as Roosevelt was already in their corner. To fan the flames, Halifax made the most dire, though unfounded warnings to Roosevelt concerning Germany’s intentions. He told Roosevelt in a telegram that Hitler planned to invade Holland and give the Dutch East Indies to Japan. (Japan needed its oil.) Germany had no such plan. He told Roosevelt that he was certain that Germany would soon give Britain an ultimatum. Halifax added that the British leaders expected a surprise air attack from Germany before the ultimatum actually arrived. He claimed to have knowledge that Germany was mobilizing for such an attack as he was composing the telegram and that the attack could occur at any moment. These were preposterous inventions.

Hitler was preoccupied at the time with the Polish matter and had not given a thought to attacking Britain. But Halifax was determined. He went on to emphasize “Hitler’s mental condition, his insensate rage against Great Britain and his megalomania.” He confided that Britain was greatly increasing her armament program, and he believed that it was his duty to enlighten Roosevelt about Hitler’s intentions and attitudes;

“in view of the relations of confidence which exist between our two governments and the degree to which we have exchanged information hitherto.”

Halifax claimed that Chamberlain was contemplating a public warning to Germany prior to Hitler’s annual Reichstag speech on January 30, 1939, and suggested that Roosevelt should do the same without delay. Chamberlain gave no such warning, but Halifax hoped to goad Roosevelt into making another alarmist and bellicose speech.

Halifax had sent Anthony Eden to the U.S. in December 1938 to spread rumors about sinister German plans, and Roosevelt responded with a provocative and insulting warning to Germany in his message to Congress on January 4, 1939. Halifax hoped for a repeat performance from Roosevelt as a result of his most recent telegram. Halifax was preparing a war propaganda campaign for the British public and such a warning from Roosevelt would feed into his purposes. All of these machinations of Lord Halifax amounted to sheer fantasy, but Roosevelt, already predisposed toward war with Germany, swallowed it whole. Halifax only told him what he already wanted to hear.

Secretary of State, Cordell Hull, another strident advocate for war, sent a message to Halifax stating that;

“the United States Government had for some time been basing their policy upon the possibility of just such a situation arising as was foreshadowed in your telegram.”

This was the Roosevelt administration’s way of informing Britain that it supported the idea of war with Germany despite American public opinion, which was totally against it.

Roosevelt wanted a war to distract attention from his failed economic policies. He also wanted war because he cherished the idea of himself as a heroic wartime president. The Jews who surrounded Roosevelt, such as Henry Morgenthau, Jr., as well as all the other officials in the Roosevelt administration, worked themselves into a fever fantasizing about Nazi Germany’s malevolent intentions.

Henry Morgenthau, Jr.

According to David L. Hoggan, in his paper, “President Roosevelt and the Origins of the 1939 War”:

“…anyone within Roosevelt’s and Hull’s circle who did not declare that Hitler was hopelessly insane was virtually ostracized.”

On January 4, 1939, Roosevelt told Congress that U.S. neutrality policy must be re-examined. He wanted a freer hand to act against Germany. At this same time (the next day, in fact) Poland’s foreign minister, Beck, joined Hitler at Berchtesgaden in an amicable meeting during which Hitler stressed German-Polish cooperation in settling the matter of Danzig and the Polish Corridor. Though cordial, the conversations were unproductive and nothing concrete was settled. Hitler made clear, however, that as Danzig was a German city, sooner or later it would have to be returned to Germany.

The contrast between Hitler’s calm, diplomatic approach in his talks with Polish officials, and the deranged, hysterical, confrontational manner imagined of him by officials surrounding Roosevelt, could not have been greater.

American Charge d’Affaires in Berlin, Prentiss Gilbert, reported back that the situation between Poland and Germany was not as incendiary as Washington officials imagined. He reported to the State Department on February 3, 1939 that Hitler’s basic policy in the East was friendship with Poland. It seemed certain according to Gilbert that Beck would be willing to allow the return of Danzig to Germany in exchange for a 25 year Pact, and for a German guarantee of the Polish Corridor. That is not, however, what Roosevelt and his officials wanted to hear. But had Britain and America stayed out of it, that is most likely what would have happened.

Germany Occupies Bohemia and Moravia

Meanwhile, what remained of Czechoslovakia after the German annexation of the Sudetenland, soon fell apart, as described in the previous chapter. All that remained of the former Czechoslovakia was parts of Bohemia and Moravia, and on March 15, 1939, with the consent of the Czecho-Slovak president, Emil Hacha, Germany occupied Bohemia and Moravia and proclaimed it a German protectorate in order to prevent its being taken over by the Communists. In any case, Bohemia and Moravia had existed under German rule for most of its thousand year history, so this was nothing new. Czechoslovakia was a new, artificial creation of the Peace Conference after WWI, which now had already fallen apart. The entire region had a German character. Mozart premiered his opera “Don Giovanni” in Prague. Pilsen, Bohemia’s fourth largest city, is known worldwide for Pilsner beer, a German beer. Another Bohemian city with a German name, Budweis, is best known for the original Budweiser beer (the European brand).

Britain initially accepted the German occupation, reasoning that her guarantee of Czechoslovakia was rendered invalid by the collapse of the Czech state. But Prime Minister Chamberlain had been under attack by Churchill, Halifax, Duff Cooper, and Vansittart, among others, for his “appeasement” of Hitler through the Munich Agreement. After Germany occupied Bohemia and Moravia, the attacks on him intensified, and were egged on even further by Roosevelt. Chamberlain became flustered and defensive. In a speech on March 17, he declared that he wished to correct a misapprehension of weakness on his part. He said that Munich had been the right policy, but now Hitler had broken that agreement by occupying Czechoslovakia (Bohemia and Moravia). From that point on, Chamberlain stated, Britain would strenuously oppose, even to the point of war, any further territorial moves by Hitler, no matter how justified.

The occupation of Bohemia and Moravia caused a greater outburst of hostility towards Germany in Washington, D.C., than it did in Britain, or for that matter, in any other capital in the world, though the reason for it is not clear. The occupation in no way affected American interests.

Nevertheless, the head of the German Embassy in Washington reported back to Berlin that a violent press campaign against Germany had been launched throughout the United States. President Roosevelt also pressured Lord Halifax to adopt an “outspoken anti-German policy,” in Britain, as well. Halifax replied by promising Roosevelt that the British leaders were “going to start educating public opinion as best they can to the need for action.” In other words, they would launch an anti-German/pro-war propaganda campaign.

Roosevelt Pushes for War

Ambassador Bullitt informed the Poles that both he and President Roosevelt were counting on Polish willingness to go to war over Danzig if necessary. On March 19, 1939, Bullitt informed the Poles that Roosevelt was prepared to do everything possible to promote a war between the British and the French against Germany. Halifax, meanwhile, was attempting to create a broad anti-German front and an encirclement of Germany by proposing an alliance to include Britain, France, Poland and the Soviet Union. The Poles distrusted the Soviets as much as they did the Germans, and backed away from any such agreement that would bind Poland to the Soviet Union.

Both Lord Halifax and President Roosevelt began to vigorously encourage the Poles in their refusal to accept the German demands regarding Danzig. Bullitt finally told the Poles that he regarded an alliance between Britain, France and Poland, without the Soviet Union, to be the best possible arrangement. He said that British leaders hoped that there would be a war between Germany and the Soviet Union, and that they were not eager to make commitments to the Soviet Union for that reason. The Soviet Union was also becoming ever more distrustful of Britain and France.

On March 26, Bullitt contacted Ambassador to London Joseph P. Kennedy and instructed him to tell Prime Minister Chamberlain that the United States hoped that Great Britain would go to war against Germany in event of hostilities over Danzig. Britain then announced a doubling in size of its army. On March 31, 1939 Prime Minister Chamberlain announced in Parliament a “blank check” guarantee to Poland in event of war between Poland and Germany, that is, that Britain would declare war on Germany if Germany were to invade Poland. France joined Britain and made the same guarantee.

Ambassador Kennedy was appalled at the idea of a war with Germany, and only reluctantly carried out his duties as Ambassador when that possibility was involved. To this extent, he was out of step with the Roosevelt administration, as well as with the British government. Both Roosevelt and Bullitt disliked and distrusted Kennedy and Kennedy disliked and distrusted both of them. In a letter to his wife, he wrote:

“I talk to Bullitt occasionally. He is more rattlebrained than ever. His judgment is pathetic and I am afraid of his influence on FDR because they think alike on many things.”

Anti-war Movement Becomes Active

Meanwhile, back in the United States, the anti-war movement was growing in strength. One of the leading voices in that movement was that of Hamilton Fish, a leading Republican congressman from New York. Fish made a series of radio speeches to expose Roosevelt’s march to war while claiming that he only wanted peace. On January 6, 1939, Fish told a nationwide radio audience:

“The inflammatory and provocative message of the President to Congress and the world [given two days before] has unnecessarily alarmed the American people and created, together with a barrage of propaganda emanating from high New Deal officials, a war hysteria, dangerous to the peace of America and the world. The only logical conclusion to such speeches is another war fought overseas by American soldiers.

All the totalitarian nations referred to by President Roosevelt … haven’t the faintest thought of making war on us or invading Latin America.

I do not propose to mince words on such an issue, affecting the life, liberty and happiness of our people. The time has come to call a halt to the warmongers of the New Deal, backed by war profiteers, Communists, and hysterical internationalists [meaning Jews], who want us to quarantine the world with American blood and money.

He [Roosevelt] evidently desires to whip up a frenzy of hate and war psychosis as a red herring to take the minds of our people off their own unsolved domestic problems. He visualizes hobgoblins and creates in the public mind a fear of foreign invasions that exists only in his own imagination.”

In another radio address of April 5, 1939, Congressman Fish said:

“The youth of America are again being prepared for another blood bath in Europe in order to make the world safe for democracy.

If Hitler and the Nazi government regain Memel or Danzig, taken away from Germany by the Versailles Treaty, and where the population is 90 percent German, why is it necessary to issue threats and denunciations and incite our people to war? I would not sacrifice the life of one American soldier for a half dozen Memels or Danzigs. We repudiated the Versailles Treaty because it was based on greed and hatred, and as long as its inequalities and injustices exist there are bound to be wars of liberation.

The sooner certain provisions of the Versailles Treaty are scrapped the better for the peace of the world.

I believe that if the areas that are distinctly German in population are restored to Germany, except Alsace-Lorraine and the Tyrol, there will be no war in western Europe. There may be a war between the Nazis and the Communists, but if there is that is not our war or that of Great Britain or France or any of the democracies.

New Deal spokesmen have stirred up war hysteria into a veritable frenzy. The New Deal propaganda machine is working overtime to prepare the minds of our people for war, who are already suffering from a bad case of war jitters.

President Roosevelt is the number one warmonger in America, and is largely responsible for the fear that pervades the Nation which has given the stock market and the American people a bad case of the jitters.

I accuse the administration of instigating war propaganda and hysteria to cover up the failure and collapse of the New Deal policies, with 12 million unemployed and business confidence destroyed.

I believe we have far more to fear from our enemies from within than we have from without. All the Communists are united in urging us to go to war against Germany and Japan for the benefit of Soviet Russia.

Great Britain still expects every American to do her duty, by preserving the British Empire and her colonies. The war profiteers, munitions makers and international bankers [meaning Jews] are all set up for our participation in a new world war.”

The hero aviator, Charles A. Lindbergh, was also a leading opponent of Roosevelt’s war aims, and went around the country speaking out against going to war with Germany. In his diary entry of May 1, 1941, Lindbergh wrote:

“The pressure for war is high and mounting. The people are opposed to it, but the Administration seems to have ‘the bit in its teeth’ and [is] hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the Jewish interests in the country are behind war, and they control a huge part of our press and radio and most of our motion pictures. There are also the ‘intellectuals,’ and the ‘Anglophiles,’ and the British agents who are allowed free rein, the international financial interests, and many others.”

Roosevelt’s motives for wanting a war with Germany have long been the subject of debate. As America’s interests were not threatened in any way by Germany, nor would they be served by a war, Roosevelt’s determination to have a war made little sense…, that is, unless one takes into account Roosevelt’s intimate ties to organized Jewry. As Jewish historian Lucy Dawidowicz noted:

“Roosevelt himself brought into his immediate circle more Jews than any other President before or after him. Felix Frankfurter, Bernard M. Baruch and Henry Morgenthau were his close advisers. Benjamin V. Cohen, Samuel Rosenman and David K. Niles were his friends and trusted aides.”

Roosevelt was totally in thrall to the Jews, owed his political career to the Jews, and had so surrounded himself with Jews, almost to the exclusion of all others, that he essentially became one of them. Their attitudes, motives and goals became his. They hated Germany, so he hated Germany. They were determined to destroy Germany, so he was determined to destroy Germany.

In the summer of 1939 Polish ambassador to Washington, Count Jerzy Potocki returned to Warsaw on leave and was astonished at the calm mood in Poland, compared to the war psychosis that had gripped the West. In a conversation with Polish Foreign Ministry Under-Secretary, Count Jan Szembek, about the growing war psychosis that had gripped the West. Potocki said to Szembek:

“In the West there are all kinds of elements openly pushing for war: the Jews, the super-capitalists, the arms dealers. Today they are all ready for a great business, because they have found a place which can be set on fire: Danzig; and a nation that is ready to fight: Poland. They want to do business on our backs. They are indifferent to the destruction of our country. Indeed, since everything will have to be rebuilt later on, they can profit from that as well.” From the diary of Count Szembek.

Poles Murder German Nationals

Within the Corridor

Reports of increased hostilities breaking out between Poles and ethnic Germans in Polish controlled territories created a feeling of urgency in Germany. For several months before Germany’s invasion of Poland, ethnic Poles, protected by the Polish Army, launched a reign of terror against German nationals living within the Polish Corridor. (Formerly part of Germany where Germans had lived for several hundred years.) It is estimated that some 58,000 German nationals were killed during this period by marauding mobs, encouraged by the Polish government. The German government lodged dozens of formal complaint with the League of Nations, but with no results. Hitler became increasingly distressed about it and said to the British Ambassador Sir Neville Henderson on August 25, 1939:

“Poland’s provocations have become intolerable.”

Typical of these massacres was that which occurred in the German town of Bromberg, in the Polish Corridor. In this massacre, called “Bloody Sunday,” 5,500 ethnic Germans were slaughtered like pigs. Children were nailed to barns, women were raped and hacked to death with axes, men were beaten and hacked to death. 328 Germans were herded into Bromberg’s Protestant church, after which the church was set on fire. All 328 burned to death.

[Add. image] William Joyce, aka, “Lord Haw Haw” and a book on his radio work for the German war effort.

William Joyce, nicknamed Lord Haw Haw by British propaganda, became a German citizen and took up Germany’s cause against Poland. He described the horrible conditions of the Germans who lived in the former German territory which was now a part of Poland, in his book, “Twilight Over England.” The following is his description of what happened in Bromberg:

“German men and women were hunted like wild beasts through the streets of Bromberg. When they were caught, they were mutilated and torn to pieces by the Polish mob… . Every day the butchery increased… . Thousands of Germans fled from their homes in Poland with nothing more than the clothes that they wore.. On the nights of August 25 to August 31 inclusive, there occurred, besides innumerable attacks on civilians of German blood, 44 perfectly authenticated acts of armed violence against German official persons and property.”

According to historian John Toland in his book “Adolf Hitler,” when Hitler first learned of the Bromberg slaughter, at first he refused to believe that such a number had been killed, but, when Berndt (the German public official who had brought the matter to his attention) replied that it may have been somewhat exaggerated but something monstrous must have happened to give rise to such stories, Hitler shouted:

“They’ll pay for this! Now no one will stop me from teaching these fellows a lesson they’ll never forget! I will not have my Germans butchered like cattle!”

At this point, according to Toland, the Fuhrer went to the phone and, in Berndt’s presence, ordered Keitel to issue “Directive No. 1 for the Conduct of the War.” That may well have been the actual trigger for the war, though the causes of the war were multiple.

Murdered Germans before their burial in the Protestant cemetery of Bromberg.

German woman weeping over the murder of her husband in Bromberg by marauding Poles.

[Add. image] The German Catholic Priest of the Church of the Sacred Heart, Bromberg, in silent prayer before the bodies of murdered Bromberg Germans.

On August 24, 1939, a week before the outbreak of hostilities, Sir Horace Wilson, advisor to Chamberlain, went to Ambassador Kennedy with an urgent appeal from Prime minister Chamberlain to President Roosevelt. He wanted Roosevelt to “put pressure on the Poles” to open negotiations with Germany in order to avert a war. Chamberlain was already regretting Britain’s “guarantee” to Poland. Kennedy telephoned the State Department and said that the British;

“felt that they could not, given their obligations, do anything of this sort but that we could.”

Roosevelt rejected Chamberlain’s plea out of hand. When Kennedy reported this back to Chamberlain, Chamberlain, according to Kennedy, said:

“The futility of it all, is the thing that is frightful. After all, we cannot save the Poles. We can merely carry on a war of revenge that will mean the destruction of all Europe.”

Kennedy sent a telegram to Roosevelt urging him to intervene on behalf of peace. “It seems to me,” Kennedy wrote;

“that this situation may crystallize to a point where the President can be the savior of the world. The British government as such certainly cannot accept any agreement with Hitler, but there may be a point when the President himself may work out plans for world peace. Now this opportunity may never arise, but as a fairly practical fellow all my life, I believe that it is entirely conceivable that the President can get himself in a spot where he can save the world.”

 

Joseph P. Kennedy, Sr., U.S. Ambassador to Britain under Roosevelt.

Roosevelt rejected Kennedy’s efforts and called Kennedy’s plea;

“…the silliest message to me that I have ever received.”

Roosevelt told Henry Morgenthau that Kennedy was a;

“pain in the neck.” “Joe has been an appeaser and will always be an appeaser,”

Roosevelt said:

“If Germany and Italy made a good peace offer tomorrow, Joe would start working on the King and his friend the Queen and from there on down to get everybody to accept it.”

Angered by Kennedy’s stubborn attempts to prevent a war in Europe, Roosevelt essentially instructed him to cease and desist, and told him that any American peace effort was completely out of the question. Kennedy resigned shortly thereafter under pressure.

Deep distrust was developing between the British government and the Soviets. The British had made strong efforts to create a mutual pact against Germany that would include Britain, France, Poland and the Soviet Union, and had finally obtained the Soviets’ agreement to a joint declaration. But when Chamberlain gave his blank check guarantee to the Polish government, he did it without consulting the Soviets. The Soviets were bewildered that the British would go ahead with a new plan without consulting them, and took it as an insult. The Soviets were already convinced that France and Britain were scheming against them. The Poles, for their part, were deeply distrustful of the Russians, and the British/French guarantee of Poland strengthened Polish resistance to Soviet participation in any kind of alliance in which they themselves took part. The British/French guarantee antagonized the Russians but at the same time did not have the effect of restraining Hitler.

Unable to reach a collective agreement with Britain and France against Germany, the Soviets began to fear that they might face a war with Germany alone, so they began searching around for a change of policy. On May 3, 1939, Stalin fired Foreign Minister Maksim Litvinov, who was Jewish and an advocate of collective security with Britain and France, and replaced him with Vyacheslav Molotov, who soon began negotiations with the Nazi foreign minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop. The Soviets, at the same time, continued negotiations with Britain and France, but in the end Stalin decided to reach an agreement with Germany. In so doing, he hoped to avoid a war with Germany until such time that he could re-build the Soviet Military which had been severely weakened by the purge of the Red Army officer corps in 1937. For his part, Hitler wanted a nonaggression pact with the Soviet Union so that his armies could invade Poland without winding up in a two front war. After the Polish matter was settled, Hitler believed that he would then be able to deal with Britain and France from the stand point of a fait accompli regarding Poland. Hitler did not believe that Britain and France would follow through on their guarantee to Poland and actually declare war on Germany. It made no sense to him that they would take such a step when they were manifestly in no position to act upon it.

The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed in Moscow on August 23, 1939. Formally a nonaggression pact, the agreement also included a secret provision to divide Northern and Eastern Europe into German and Soviet spheres of influence. Poland was to be divided between Germany and the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was to take back the region of Poland that it had controlled since 1772. The Baltic states, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bessarabia, Northern Bukovina and the Hertza region (on the Romanian border in Southern Ukraine), were ceded to Soviet control.

Soviet Foreign Minister Molotov signs the Nazi-Soviet Non-aggression Pact while German Foreign Minister von Ribbentrop and Stalin look on.

The news of the Pact was met with utter shock and surprise by government leaders and media worldwide, most of whom were unaware of the negotiations which had been going on between the Soviet Union and Germany. They were aware only of the ongoing negotiations between the Soviets and Britain and France. Jews around the world, who looked upon the Soviet Union as the base of International Jewry, were particularly shocked by the agreement. They saw it as a sell out by the Soviets. In reality it was only a ploy to buy time by both Stalin and Hitler, and neither side saw it as permanent.

During the months leading up to the outbreak of war, Polish armed forces repeatedly violated German borders. Numerous altercations occurred between Polish irregulars and regular or auxiliary Germans all along the Polish/German border; in each case, on German territory. Poland in 1939 was highly militarized with an army larger than the German army. Moreover, Poland’s new leaders were military men with an aggressive attitude towards Germany. Poland even underwent a partial mobilization in March, 1939, and on August 30, 1939, ordered a total mobilization. (According to the Geneva Convention, mobilization is equivalent to a declaration of war.) On August 31, 1939, Polish irregular armed forces launched a full scale attack on the German border town of Gleiwitz.

The next day, September 1, 1939, German forces invaded Poland. On that same day, Hitler addresses the Reichstag.

“For months we have been suffering under the torture of a problem which the Versailles Diktat created ― a problem which has deteriorated until it becomes intolerable for us. Danzig was and is a Germany city. The Corridor was and is German. Both these territories owe their cultural development exclusively to the German people. Danzig was separated from us, the Corridor was annexed by Poland. As in other German territories of the East, all German minorities living there have been ill-treated in the most distressing manner.

… proposals for mediation have failed because in the meanwhile there, first of all, came as an answer the sudden Polish general mobilization, followed by more Polish atrocities. These were again repeated last night. Recently in one night there were as many as twenty-one frontier incidents; last night there were fourteen, of which three were serious. I have, therefore, resolved to speak to Poland in the same language that Poland for months past has used towards us. This night for the first time Polish regular soldiers fired on our territory. Since 5:45 a.m. we have been returning fire, and from now on bombs will be met by bombs. Whoever fights with poison gas will be fought with poison gas.”

The invasion of Poland occurred one week after the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed. On September 3, 1939, to Hitler’s great surprise, Britain and France declared war on Germany, though they totally lacked the means of intervening in Poland.

On September 3, also, Winston Churchill was returned to the cabinet by Prime Minister Chamberlain as First Lord of the Admiralty, the job he had had in WWI. Churchill’s bellicose warnings against Hitler leading up to the war now made him seem prescient and far sighted to many. On September 17, the Soviet Union invaded Poland from the other side. The Soviet invasion of Poland produced no reaction from Britain and France, though the Soviets had done precisely the same thing the Germans had done, albeit, without Germany’s justification of reclaiming lost territory. This gave the lie to Britain’s reason for declaring war on Germany.

Germany’s invasion of Poland provided only Britain’s needed pretext for war. It was not a casus belli. The war with Poland ended on October 6, 1939, after which Germany and the Soviet Union divided and annexed Poland.

As in interjection, we shall mention here the reaction of Poland’s Jews to the Russian invasion of Poland. Jews throughout Europe saw the Soviet Union as “good for the Jews,” and were very favorably disposed towards the Soviet Union. Alexander Solzhenitsyn, in his book “Two Hundred Years Together,” wrote that when the Soviets invaded Poland:

“Polish Jews, and the Jewish youth in particular, met the advancing Red Army with exulting enthusiasm” (as they had also done during the Soviet invasion of 1919).

The enthusiastic welcome of the Soviet invaders by Poland’s Jews angered Polish patriots and became a major aspect of Polish anti-Jewish attitudes in later years. Jews welcomed the Soviet troops in the very same way when they later invade Lithuania, the other Baltic States, and other central and east European countries. After the war when the Soviet Union took control of all of Eastern and Central Europe, all-Jewish regimes were installed in each of these countries.

Hitler’s invasion of Poland is known as the beginning of World War II, though that is not what Hitler intended. Hitler did not even want a war with Poland, much less a world war. Hitler had made every attempt to settle diplomatically the dispute with Poland over the return of Danzig and a highway across the Polish Corridor. In fact, Hitler wanted more than to simply settle the dispute with Poland; he wanted an alliance with Poland in his anti-Comintern pact against the Soviet Union, which he had already concluded with Japan. Poland saw the Soviet Union as her enemy and the anti-Comintern pact would actually have served Poland’s interests. They were foolish, indeed, to have rejected it.

The Poles had stubbornly refused to negotiate with Germany for a number of reasons. First, the Poles and the Germans had shared a mutual hostility for centuries. The military officers who ruled Poland were a proud lot with an exaggerated confidence in their military power. Britain, France and the United States all pressured Poland to resist Hitler’s demands; and finally, British Prime Minister Chamberlain had insanely given the Poles an unsolicited war guarantee, promising to declare war on Germany if Hitler invaded, and he talked France into doing the same. From March to August, 1939, Hitler did his best to negotiate a settlement with Poland over Danzig, and his demands were far from unreasonable. But the Poles, confident in their British and French war guarantee defiantly refused. Finally, at wits end, Hitler made a deal with Stalin and the two invaded and divided Poland.

What would it have cost Poland to have concluded a peaceful settlement with Hitler? The German city of Danzig, which was under the supervision of the League of Nations, and did not belong to Poland, would have been returned to Germany. Germany would also have been allowed to build a highway and a railroad across the former German territory, the Polish Corridor, to reconnect with East Prussia. That’s it! A peaceful settlement of the dispute would have taken nothing away from Poland. But the cost of refusing to settle the dispute peacefully was a world war in which millions of Poles were killed, much of their country destroyed, followed by 50 years of Nazi and Soviet occupation. If Poland had yielded, there would have been no World War II, no Cold War, no Korean War, and no Vietnamese War, and Eastern Europe would have escaped the horrific occupation and domination by the Soviet Union.

[END of Part 17]

______________________________

PDF Notes

* Total words = 14,484

* Total pages = 70

*Total images = 22

*Note: Images not in original book are indicated as “Add. image” (Additional image).

*Text in [square brackets] is not part of the original book.

*Special thanks to reader “mblaine” for providing the text for this book.

======================================

Click to download a PDF of this post (3.0 MB).

The Myth of Germany Villainy – Part 17

Click on a link to go to another part:

[Click images to enlarge]

Part 01 — Cover text; About the Author; Preface; Chapter 1: The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation

Part 02 — Chapter 2: Aftermath of the War in Germany

Part 03 — Chapter 3: The Jewish Factor in the War

Part 04 — Chapter 4: The Russian Revolution of 1917

Part 05 — Chapter 5: The Red Terror

Part 06 — Chapter 6: The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads Throughout Europe

Part 07 — Chapter 7: The Nation of Israel

Part 08 — Chapter 8: Jews in Weimar Germany

Part 09 — Chapter 9: Hitler and National Socialists Rise to Power

Part 10 — Chapter 10: National Socialism vs Communism

Part 11 — Chapter 11: Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany

Part 12 — Chapter 12: The Nazis and the Zionists Actually Work Together for Jewish Emigration out of Germany

Part 13 — Chapter 13: Life in Germany Under Hitler

Part 14 — Chapter 14 & 15: Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory; The 1936 Olympics

Part 15 — Chapter 16: “Anschluss” The Unification of Austria and Germany

Part 16 – Chapter 17: Germany Annexes the Sudetenland

Part 17 – Chapter 18: War with Poland

Part 18 – Chapter 19: The Phony War

Part 19 – Chapter 20: Germany invades France – The Phony War Ends

Part 20 – Chapter 21: The Allied Goal? Destruction of Germany!

Part 21 – Chapter 22: Germany as Victim

Part 22 (last) – Chapter 23: Winners and Losers

See also:

The Myth of German Villainy: Author Ben Bradberry Interview — TRANSCRIPT

_____________________

Version History

Version 5: Mar 13, 2021 – Added new Go2 Cover images (3).

Version 4: May 5, 2020 — Re-uploaded images and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version.

Version 3: Apr 9, 2020 — Updated links to other parts.

 Version 2: Mar 16, 2017 — Improved formatting. Added PDF of post for download.

Version 1:Mar 15, 2017 — Created post.

[Horst Mahler describes the creation of the Nuremberg Trials by American jews and how the trials were kangaroo courts that lynched the Germans  — KATANA.]

The Holocaust Lie

Made in America

circa 2006

[Source: http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/HomePage28April2009/holocaust_lie/holocaust_lie.htm]

No one denies that America and Germany incarcerated certain fractions of their populations under guard as war measures in the 1940s.  Americans like to forget that at least 120,000 Americans of Japanese extraction were rounded up and put in concentration camps in the western United States for the duration of the war.  However, they never permit the Germans to forget that Jews in German-controlled areas of Europe were treated likewise, though the reason was the same — a specific group was detained because some unknown fraction within it was a danger to the war effort and neither country was willing to risk letting it remain free for possible sabotage.  There is no dispute about this.  It happened.

However, what credible historical investigators worldwide now assert — and with excellent reasons — is that the German Reich did not give murderous orders concerning, and in fact did not actually murder, the Jews in its camps.  The Jews suffered more in Germany than the Japanese suffered in America because the enemy’s carpet bombing of Germany eventually destroyed the country’s ability to properly maintain the camps.  Everybody practically starved toward the end, Jews included.  We must remember that Germany had perfectly good reasons to distrust the Jews as a group.  As a nation within a nation they had utterly betrayed the country in World War I and moreover had literally declared worldwide economic and political war against Germany in 1933.

[Image – click to enlarge] Judea declares war on Germany, March 24, 1933

 Auschwitz (main Camp), Poland

Notwithstanding the understandably bad feelings against Jews in Germany, there were no despicable gas chambers or murderous crematoria.  No tattoos*.  No lampshades.  There were no sadistic plots but merely a war effort that failed — nothing for Germans to be ashamed of then or now.  The indictment alleging systematic extermination of the Jews was and is false.  Evidence was fabricated and/or purposely misrepresented and depositions falsified.  In fact, the “Holocaust” Lie was manufactured in America to justify the murder of captured German leaders as a precursor to the subordination of Germany, the Zionist-Jewish theft of Palestine, and genocidal American interference in the national affairs of Europe, each of which continues today.

[* See: http://www.cwporter.com/tattoo1.htm]

“Holocaust” Conference in Tehran, Dec, 2006

German lawyer Horst Mahler, probably the most brilliant political mind in Europe today, with a vast knowledge of history and politics, recently attempted to travel to Tehran to talk about the foregoing at a conference called by Iranian historical scholars.  The government of Germany — which is not an independent power even today in such matters — promptly ordered Herr Mahler’s passport to be confiscated.  On January 29, 2006, he protested in a letter to a certain Judge Dehne.  Here in essential part (as translated by James Damon) is what he told the judge in that case (we omit footnotes and edit slightly for brevity):

Horst Mahler

“Perhaps it still has not gotten through to you that the leaders of world Jewry — especially the brothers Jacob and Nehemiah Robinson, the ‘King of Diaspora Jews’ Nahum Goldmann, the ‘Emperor of America’ Felix Frankfurter, the ‘Right Hand of President Roosevelt’ Sam Rosenman, and Rabbi [Stephen] Wise — did in fact meet together and conspire in order to lend credence to the historical lies of the ‘International Military Tribunal’ for the so called ‘Nuremberg Trials’ conducted against the leaders of the Reich, which the Jewish leaders planned in detail.

Samuel Rosenman, the ‘Right Hand of President Roosevelt’

The Holocaust laws of the OMF [Organizational Form of a Modality of Foreign Rule — i.e., the current Federal Republic of Germany] are continuing the judicial tradition of Stalinist show trials introduced into Germany by the victorious Allies with the International Military Tribunal.  Far from being guided by a quest for reality and justice, they are a ‘continuation of the war effort of the allied nations’ in the words of U.S. Chief Prosecutor Robert Jackson.  The OMF/Federal Republic courts which impose the Holocaust laws are nothing but a cover for despotic rule by the enemies of the Reich.

Following unconditional capitulation by the Wehrmacht at the end of World War II, the victorious Allies had the power to write the history of the period as they saw fit.  Not surprisingly, they labeled the Germans as ‘criminal,’ just as they had attempted to do during the First World War.  They then established their postwar order of global Mammonism, based on the historical lies they fabricated.  There is no possibility that our enemies could ever be inclined to give up the fruits of their victory over the Reich.  They have always been determined and are still determined to hold onto them and protect the source of their wealth.

Willy Meller: ‘Hour of Fate’ (1944)

He who builds his house on lies fears nothing more that the truth, which can tear it down at any time.  This is the reason why, where historiography is concerned, the courts of the OMF/Federal Republic are bound to uphold the lies of the victorious powers in complete disregard for German public opinion.  These courts are forced to uphold the Allies’ lies against the Reich leadership exactly as they were proclaimed in the Nuremberg show trials . . . .

According to Article 19 of its statute dated 8 August 1945, the International Military Tribunal was not bound by rules of evidence.  According to the Article 20 of the same statute, the court could admit or reject evidence as it desired. Thus, rebuttal evidence that the defense could have used to counter the prosecutors’ charges was frequently not taken into consideration.

The basis of verdicts formulated by the Nuremberg court contain recitals of facts relating to the causes of the Second World War and the actions of German armed forces.  According to Article 7 (1) [an FRG statute], they may not be questioned by German courts and authorities, even in the light of new historical evidence.  Regarding content of school books, the ministries for education and the arts are also bound by these recitals of fact.

Mr. Dehne, you know very well what is expected of you.  By enforcing the Holocaust lies against historical truth you are acting as a direct agent of the destructive will of our enemies.  Enforcement of the ‘laws’ of the OMF/Federal Republic assures that no actions can ever impair the interests of the Jews.

Where Holocaust law is concerned, it is stated very openly.  This situation necessitates a brief discussion of the Nuremberg Tribunal, which is a disgrace to Western civilization.

The credit for inventing the Tribunal goes to two Lithuanian Jews, the brothers Jacob and Nehemiah Robinson, while credit for actual implementation belongs to the Jewish World Congress.  World Congress President Nahum Goldmann, the ‘King of the Diaspora Jews,’ praised its creation as:

‘One of the greatest acts in the history of international justice and morals.’

Nahum also gives us an idea of how Jewish circles were employed to introduce this idea to the U.S. government.

Nahum Goldmann

He writes:

‘Under the leadership of the two brothers Robinson, the Jewish World Congress devoted a great deal of energy to the mental and moral preparation of these trials.  To the great credit of the Roosevelt Administration, it unerringly adopted their principles and was able to put them through against the doubts of many among the Allies, especially in England.’

Goldmann’s account informs us just how this came about:

‘In the war years 1941 and 1942 we received information from Geneva concerning the destruction of Jews in the Nazi camps.  This prompted Wise to decide that we had to visit the President and insist that the Allies warn the Germans about the consequences of their brutal policy and their certain punishment after the War…    We arranged a weekend meeting with Rosenman in his summer villa near Roosevelt’s “Hyde Park” in order to discuss what he should recommend to the President in Washington on Monday.

Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill

It was a hot morning and we sitting on Rosenman’s veranda without jackets and ties when we suddenly heard the signal that the President’s car always gave.  We suddenly realized that Roosevelt was coming to see Rosenman.  We began putting on our coats and ties, but Rosenman said this was not necessary since Roosevelt attached no importance to formalities.  Very soon the President’s car stopped in front of the veranda, and before we could greet him, Roosevelt humorously remarked:

‘Well now, this is interesting — Sam Rosenman, Stephen Wise and Nahum Goldmann sitting here discussing what orders they want to give the President of the United States!  Just imagine what the Nazis would give for a picture of this little scene.’

We began stuttering that we were discussing an urgent message from Europe that Rosenman wanted to show him on Monday.  But Roosevelt just winked and said:

“That’s fine.  Sam can come to see me on Monday and tell me what I’m supposed to do.”

Then he drove off.’

In another place Goldmann expresses the pleasures of exercising power even more intimately:

‘Seduction can turn into passion…  The sensation of seducing a woman might be more intense momentarily, but winning a statesman is something very similar . . . .  During the time I lived in America nearly all presidents — Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon — had their “Court Jews,” wealthy people who helped finance their election campaigns and influential leaders of the Jewish community.’

Another prominent ‘Court Jew’ was Felix Frankfurter, to whom Roosevelt was always ‘very personally attached.’  For many years Frankfurter was ‘one of the most influential personalities in Washington,’ which made him a competitor for the sobriquet ‘Emperor of America’ among some Jews.  Many of Frankfurter’s students were appointed to high positions in the Roosevelt administration.  Goldman remarked that:

‘Frankfurter had no desire to perform on stage, but he derived all the more pleasure from pulling strings behind the scenes.’

Felix Frankfurter

While the British government argued in favor of summarily executing captured German leaders — at least 50,000 of them — Stalin favored the show trials that were dear to his heart.  The United States was also interested in such trials.  Under international law, however, it was not possible to punish military personnel for carrying out orders.  When Jacob Robinson suggested placing captured Germans before a tribunal anyway, American judges on the Supreme Court said he was crazy.

‘What was unusual about the wartime actions of the Nazi officers?’ they asked.

It might have been possible to place Hitler and even Göring before a court, but certainly not ordinary military men who conducted themselves as loyal soldiers and carried out orders.  Finally Robinson succeeded in persuading Supreme Court Judge Robert Jackson to accept his point of view.

Robert H. Jackson (1892-1954), a close friend and trusted adviser of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, had served as  Assistant Attorney General from 1936 to 1939 and as Attorney General in 1940 and 1941.  He was of the opinion that an Allied military tribunal would be;

‘a continuation of the war efforts of the allied nations.’

At war’s end Jackson was sent to Europe with instructions to juridically brand Germany for all time as the aggressor nation solely responsible for World War II.

Georg Slyterman von Langeweyde: ‘Knight’ (ca. 1935)

         Caption: ‘Victory or defeat rests in God’s hands/But we are masters and king of our honor.’

On Roosevelt’s orders, Judge Samuel Rosenman had gone to London at the beginning of April 1945 in order to develop plans for a collective trial of ‘German War Criminals.’  On 5 April Lord Chancellor Sir John Simon, head of the British juridical system, had argued for summary execution of Hitler and his cohorts without any kind of trial.  British Attorney General Sir David Maxwell Fyfe informed  Rosenman that he also was;

‘personally in favor of the method of summary execution.’

On the next day, however, Simon announced that Washington needed;

‘judicial proceedings before executions.’

Obviously, those who thought up the tribunal idea had persuaded  the ‘head of the British legal system’ of the advantage of having a high ranking international ‘Judiciary’ create the ‘manifest obviousness’ necessary to support the historical lies about German criminality and war guilt.  But would any judge accept the idea that the victorious Allies’ shooting of 50,000 captured National Socialists proved the 50,000 victims had committed the cruel deeds of which they were accused by their enemies?  That was most unlikely.  Any ‘judge’ who accepted the notion that being a victim of murder proves that the victim of murder had committed a capital offense and therefore makes his guilt obvious, would presumably land in an insane asylum.

President Truman. The 33rd President of the United States. In office April 12, 1945 – January 20, 1953

After Roosevelt’s death [April 12, 1945], and with the acquiescence of the President Truman, Rosenman officially offered Jackson the post of chief prosecutor at the victors’ tribunal.  The offer came with this stipulation:

‘The captured Nazis should first receive a ‘fair trial’ — and then be hanged!’

‘Extraordinarily happy about the offer,’ Jackson accepted immediately.  He had long defended the thesis that in the 20th Century, 19th Century concepts about war no longer applied.  He also believed that the USA, on account of its ‘leadership role in the world,’ was entitled to intervene in any military conflict and act as it saw fit.  Jackson announced that in order to ‘secure the moral leadership of the USA’ he was authorized to ‘prove,’ with the help of a military tribunal, that:

‘These damned Germans were solely responsible for the war . . . .  We need a scapegoat on which to foist the world’s evils for a long time to come.’

Robert Jackson at Nuremberg

In consultations preparatory to the tribunal, Jackson ignored the objections advanced by the European allies that the accused could prove, based on documents seized in France, that the Reich was not responsible for the outbreak of World War II; rather, the War had been forced on Germany.  They pointed out that the documents would prove that England, France, and the USA had all backed Poland in its stubborn and aggressive attitude toward Germany.  After all, Poland had mobilized twice before Germany mobilized.  In July 1939, Polish Marshall Rydz-Smigly publicly stated before officers in Thorn that;

‘Poland wants war and Germany will not be able to prevent it, even if it wants to.’

Furthermore,  Roosevelt had for all practical purposes declared war against Germany in 1941.  The German Declaration of War was completely legitimate, given the provocative American aggressions against German ships and its violation of neutrality by delivering weapons to the British.

None of that could be mentioned during the trial, of course.  Germany must be branded and condemned as the sole guilty party, and the European war had to be presented as German aggression from the very beginning.  Brigadier General Telford Taylor, later the chief American advisor for the prosecution, objected that it would not be possible in a fair trial;

‘to push through the absurd notion of Germany’s sole guilt — rather, the opposite will come out.’

Finally the USA had driven Hitler into a Polish trap from which he was unable to extricate himself:   Churchill and Roosevelt had agreed on the complete annihilation of the German Reich from the very beginning.

Troika:  Stalin, Roosevelt, and Churchill

To this Jackson retorted:

‘Who’s talking about a fair trial?  Of course the Germans will try to accuse the Allies of pursuing a policy that forced them into war.  I expect that, since I know about the documents seized from the German Foreign Office.  They all come to the same conclusion:

“We have no way out.  We must fight; we are encircled; we are being strangled:”

Well, it would be a catastrophe if this trial got into a discussion about the political and economic causes of the war.  That could cause an unending disaster in both America and Europe . . . .’

Taylor concluded:

‘That means the question of who is guilty of starting the war must be avoided at all costs . . . it must not be allowed to come up.’

That, however, would be possible only if Jackson could succeed as lawmaker, in setting up the rules of the game for a perfect trial by simply forbidding all discussion of the causes of the war before the tribunal.  Jackson took Taylor’s remarks as his guidelines and remarked:

‘If all documents and statements to this effect are rejected by the court as irrelevant or unimportant, the war policies of the Western Powers, Poland and the USSR cannot be discussed.’

 

Pax Americana (Anon.)

Taylor expressed the idea in a metaphor, saying:

‘The shark pool of European politics between the wars must appear as a carp pond with one single evil pike swimming around.’

Jackson added:

‘And this pike — Hitler naturally — must by the end of the trial have mutated into a monstrous killer shark, threatening to devour all the little fish and striving for world domination.’

On 6 June 1945 Jackson reassured Truman with a report setting out the new ‘legal concepts’ along with his plans for the course of the trial, which included a London conference with jurists from all the other allies.  This conference took place in London between June 26 and August 8, 1945.

The French Professor of international law, Dr. Gros, began by pointing out that ‘wars of aggression’ did not represent a criminal violation of international law . . . .  If the war were thought of as a ‘criminal act of individuals,’ however, the law could be bent.

The latest book by Trainin [the Soviet expert on international law who took part in the conference] states that:

‘A war of aggression is to be regarded as an international crime in the sense of the discussions held at the League of Nations.’

Compensation can be demanded, but criminal penalties do not ensue. For this reason, he said, one may not invent a punishment.   Trainin would have liked to come to a different conclusion; but, as he stated, a ‘war of aggression’ entails no criminal liability.  Furthermore  the Joint Declaration made at the Yalta Conference in February 1945 made no mention of the crime of aggressive war.

Adolf Hitler portrait

Adolf Hitler bust (B. Bleeker, 1937)

Jackson reacted to these objections with indignation.  He said that the U.S. had conducted total war and paid no attention to international law, unless it had reason to fear retaliation by the enemy.

Furthermore, since the U.S. was the most powerful victor, no one was in a position to hinder it from introducing new guidelines in the interest of the Allies.  With this in mind he had worked out his own proposal for the prosecution.  It contained the following main points:

‘Offensive war, invasion, attack in violation of international laws and treaties, along with war as an instrument of national policy.’

He stated that he considered charges of war atrocities as being of ‘secondary importance.’

In the course of further discussions he explained:

‘As far as specific charges are concerned, the United States are particularly interested in developing the (new) criminal charge of waging aggressive war, in order to depict Germany’s entire conduct of the war as illegal.  This is because, during the War, I suggested certain measures to President Roosevelt that under international law could be justified only with the theory that Germany’s conduct was illegal.  In order to justify these measures, the United States have [sic] a particular interest in judicially establishing the illegality of the German war.’

The French appeals court judge Robert Falco gave Jackson something to consider by pointing out that:

‘If we go through with this, the court will be punishing the Germans for crimes with which the Allies can also be charged.’

Thus the problem was, how could the victors conduct in international court, an international trial for violation of international law, in which Germany’s violations of international law would be pilloried and punished, but theirs would not?  It had to be anticipated that the world would hurl the response ‘But you did the same thing!’ back in the victors’ faces, and the judges from neutral countries would throw out the whole trial.

‘At the end, the whole thing would turn into an international tribunal,’ Falco lamented.

At this point Jackson dropped his mask.  His response was:

‘You must understand that it is not going to be just an international tribunal, but an international military tribunal!  And nobody will have a say about its composition except we and we alone.  All the judges will be picked from countries that took part in the War.  We will be the ones who frame the court charter, determine the composition of the court, and write the legal code for the court.  We will be the court prosecutors and the court judges.  In this trial neither the accused nor the witnesses will have a right to testify freely, except perhaps Hermann Göring.’

 

Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering portrait

Here Prof. Gros interjected that:

‘If lawmakers, prosecutors and judges are all the same persons, this fact alone will constitute a decisive objection.  In every legal system with which I am familiar, such a composition would be illegal and impossible.’

Again he raised the question:

‘Besides, how can men who have committed no criminal acts still be accused and sentenced?  We French may think that such a thing would be politically desirable, but it is not possible under international law.’

Jackson had no response to that except a cynical rejection of legal procedure by stating:

‘I must admit that international law is weak and unclear in support of our position . . . .  We simply have to explain that the Germans are personally responsible.’

Prof. Gros still could not follow his thought.  He objected:

‘The acts of which the German leaders can be accused is an old familiar story, but the fact remains that no one has ever declared such deeds to be criminal violations of international law.  If we do this now, it will be a case of ex post facto lawmaking.’

Prof. Gros’s objection did not impress Jackson in the least:

‘You may be right,’ he replied.

‘Precisely for that reason, explanations and discussions of the principles of international law must be restricted to the minimum in the courtroom.’

At this point British Attorney General Maxwell-Fyfe interjected:

‘What we want to avoid in this trial is a discussion about whether or not the proceedings are violations of international law.  We shall simply state what international law is and then not allow any discussion of whether it is international law or not.’

Jackson reiterated the quintessence of the discussion in these words:

‘You are entirely right.  After all, the Allies are still technically at war with Germany, even though its military and political institutions have collapsed.  Our military court represents a continuation of the war effort of the Allied nations . . . .  As the victors, we see it as our undisputed right to keep secret from the court every document and every witness that could prove damaging to us.’

Prof. Gros again objected:

‘But that is turning  the entire European legal tradition upside down.  So we are not interested in establishing the truth here, we are just interested in winning a judicial victory?’

Jackson:

‘That’s right.  And since all the advantages are on our side, our victory before the court is assured.’

 

Arno Breker: ‘Departure of the Warrior’ (1942)

Thus the Nuremberg Tribunal was and remains to this day a triumph of power over the law, committed by criminals who wrapped themselves in judges’ robes.

On 8 August 1945 the London conference ended with the ‘Agreement on the Prosecution and Punishment of the Principal War Criminals of the European Axis Powers’ including the court statute for this court that was appended to the agreement. The protocols of the London sessions were illegally published four years later as the ‘Report of Robert H. Jackson.’

If they had been made public in 1945, in any trial conducted according to English Common Law, they would have caused a mistrial.  As soon as they knew of these discussions, the judges would have had no choice except to discontinue the trial or begin anew.  Those present at the London conference understood this perfectly well:  any verdict that was reached before the trial would have to be overruled.  The judges who participated in the London discussions were clearly compromised.

They were obligated to recuse themselves, but they failed to do this.   The precise index of sources for this matter may be found in Hans Meiser’s book ‘Das Tribunal,’ a computerized copy of which is appended hereto [see PDF below].

Das Tribunal by Hans Meiser

When one realizes that the International Military Tribunal was nothing except a victors’ consortium for murder, it becomes clear . . . that . . . the so-called ‘judges’ at Nuremberg accomplished nothing more than rationalizing the murder of the Reich leadership [and] . . . have mercilessly delivered the entire German nation for all time to the ‘Auschwitz Cudgel,’ with which our enemy is annihilating the soul of the German nation.

Lectures on the Holocaust by Germar Rudolf

The ‘manifest obviousness of the Holocaust’ alleged by the courts of OMF/Federal Republic of Germany is but an empty phrase.  There is no evidence for the event conjured by this battle cry, as is clearly demonstrated in the appended book by Germar Rudolf: ‘Vorlesungen über den Holocaust — Strittige Fragen im Kreuzverhör’ (’Lectures on the Holocaust — Controversial Issues Cross Examined’).

Castle Hill Publishers, P.O. Box 118, Hastings, TN34 3ZQ, UK (April 2005) [Americans should visit http://vho.org/store/USA to purchase this illustrated 568-page book (ISBN No. 1591480019) in English.  For all non-Europeans Castle Hill’s address is 253 W. 72nd Street, #1711, New York, NY 10023 USA].

Mr. Dehne, perhaps you now understand the panic with which world Jewry is reacting to [Iranian] President Ahmadinejad’s announcement that Iran will sponsor a scientific commission and conference to investigate the authenticity of the Holocaust.  If, as you state, my participation in the conference planned by the Iranian government would threaten ‘serious consequences’ for the Bundesrepublik, then you have said everything about the Federal Republic that needs to be said.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

The Bundesrepublik, along with the Basic Law, is doomed to vanish on the day when:

‘A constitution goes into effect  that has been created by the German nation in a free election.’  (Article 146 of the Basic Law.)

This will be the day when the German nation through its Reichsordnende Versammlung (Constitutional Convention) officially rejects the historical falsifications sponsored by the enemies of the Reich and reclaims its sovereignty.  That day is coming sooner than you think.  The Tehran conference will greatly facilitate the dissolution of the Federal Republic, since it is constructed on a great lie that will be demolished in Tehran: the Holocaust Lie.

In conclusion [said Horst Mahler], I would like to remind you that the German Reich continues to exist.  Its laws are still in effect.  They can not at present be carried out, for the reason that foreign domination, in clear violation of international law, is hindering the Reich by force from doing so,.  When the Reich’s ability to function is again secured, actions such as yours will be punishable as treason.”

Reichsparteitag Nurnberg, 1939

_________________________

©-free 2009 Adelaide Institute

———————————————-

See also:

The World Conquerors — Part 10: New Purim and Nuremberg

Nuremberg and Other War Crimes — Part 1

———————————————-

This is a German translation of The Blackguard — Winston Churchill. If readers spot any significant errors in the translation please let me know in the comment section.]

[Click to enlarge]

Das Blackguard

Winston Churchill

The Barnes Review — 2012 Januar – Februar

ILLUSTRATION: RICHARD COLE I DRAWN & QUARTERED/NEWSCOM

& KATANA

Der Artikel wird von BROSCHÜRE exzerpiert kühn berechtigt, That Bastard Churchill, von patriotischen Schriftsteller Maj. ME Thurgood. Es wird eine Blasenbildung ausgesetzt werden von Winston Churchill Mangel an Menschlichkeit und Ritterlichkeit im Krieg, seine schlechte Laune und bizarren Gewohnheiten und seine unersättliche Gier nach Alkohol – unten gewaschen mit einer guten Dosis von Christian Blut. Die jahrzehntelange Propaganda haben Millionen von Menschen glauben, Churchill war eine Art eines englischen Retter, wenn in der Tat, der Architekt der Zerstörung des britischen Empire war er.

Von Major MERVYN F. THURGOOD

[Bild] Eine junge Winston Churchill (1881).

Winston Spencer Churchill wurde 1874 als Sohn von Lord Randolph Churchill, dem dritten Sohn des Herzogs von Marlborough, geboren. Die erste Erziehungschule des Knaben war Harrow. Nach dreimaligem Versuch gelang ihm später die Aufnahme zum Sandhurst Military College. Seine Stärke war die englische Sprache. In der Mathematik war er ein Versager, und beim Schulabgang zählte er zu den Schlechtesten seiner Klasse.

[Bild] Winston Churchill trat Sandhurst 1893 als Kavalleriekadetten.

Während seiner Sandhurstzeit wurde er eines schwerwiegenden moralischen Vergehens im “Oscar Wilde Stil” (homosexuelle Betätigung, d. F.) angeklagt. Churchill strengte ein Verfahren gegen den Vater eines der ihn beschuldigenden Kadetten an. Die Klage wurde zurückgezogen, und Churchill erhielt eine Abfindung von 400 Pfund. Kaum war dieser Zwischenfall vergessen, war Churchill in einen Steeplechaseschwindel (steeplechase = Hindernisjagdrennen, d. V.) verwickelt. Als Folge davon wurden er und seine Kumpanen von der Zeitschrift TRUTH angegriffen.

[Bild] Dezember 1894 im Alter von 20, Winston links Sandhurst als Kavallerieoffizier in der 4. Husaren.

1895 verbrachte Churchill zusammen mit einem Freund, Reginald Barnes, sechs Wochen mit spanischem Militär auf Kuba, von wo er tägliche Berichte an den Daily Graphic verschickte.

[Bild] Daily Graphic war eine britische Wochen illustrierte Zeitung, zunächst am 4. Dezember 1869 von William Luson Thomas Firmen Illustrated Newspapers Limited veröffentlicht.

Im Jahr 1895, Churchill und Kameraden Reginald Barnes, nach Kuba zu beobachten, die im Kampf gegen die spanische kubanischen Guerilleros; er den Auftrag, über den Konflikt von der Daily Graphic Schreiben erhalten hatte.

Die Betätigung als Journalist schien ihm interessanter als das Soldatenleben. Er erkannte jedoch schnell, daß die Armee ein gutes Sprungbrett für eine politische Karriere war. So schloß er sich der Malakandtruppe an der Nordwestgrenze Indiens an und beteiligte sich an gelegentlichen Scharmützeln mit den Afridis, die jedoch entgegen Churchills Darstellungen von schweren Kämpfen nur mit Steinen geworfen hatten. Churchills nächstes militärisches Abenteuer führte ihn 1898 mit den 21. Lancers beim Vorstoß Kitcheners auf Chartum nach Omdurman. Auch hier überwog das Schreiben von Berichten für die Times und die Morning Post über seinen militärischen Ehrgeiz.

Lord Kitchener sagte von ihm, daß er zwar Mut habe, jedoch die Armee nur als Hilfsmittel nutzte, und daß er seine Kommandierungen, die für seine Zwecke nützlich schienen, sich über seine Beziehungen durch seine Mutter verschaffen konnte. Von 1899 bis 1900 diente er als Kriegsberichter in Südafrika, und er verstand es, den Ruhm für sich zu begründen, daß er in Gefangenschaft geraten und daraus geflohen war. [1]

[Bild] Winston Churchill (rechts mit den Händen hinter dem Rücken). Picture drei Tage nach seiner Gefangennahme durch die Buren gemacht.

[Bild] Als Churchill aus dem Kriegsgefangenenlager entkommen, ein Fahndungsplakat herausgegeben wurde, mit £ 25 (tot oder lebendig) für seine Rückeroberung.

Im Jahre 1900 wurde er mit 26 Jahren als Konservativer zum Parlamentsabgeordneten für Oldham gewählt. 1904 trat er zu den Liberalen über. 1908 wurde er als Präsident des Board of Trade ins Kabinett berufen. 1910 wird er Innenminister, und 1911 Erster Lord der Admiralität. Man wird an eine Zeile in Gilbert and Sullivans HMS Pinafore erinnert:

“Bleib dicht an deinem Pult, fahre nie zur See, und du kannst Lord über die Königliche Flotte werden.”

 

 

[Bild] Winston Churchill eher genossen Krieg. Im Juli 1914, als Großbritannien vorbereitet für den entgegenkommenden Katastrophe, Churchill, die zum Zeitpunkt der Erste Lord der Admiralität, schrieb seiner Frau;

“Ich bin interessiert, und glücklich ausgerichtet. Ist es nicht schrecklich, so zu bauen?”

Und im Jahr 1916, in einem Brief an David Lloyd George Tochter, gab Churchill:

“Ich denke, ein Fluch soll auf mir ruhen – denn ich liebe diesen Krieg. Ich weiß, es zerschlagen und zerschmetterte das Leben von Tausenden jeden Augenblick, und doch, ich kann mir nicht helfen, ich genieße jede Sekunde davon.”

Im 1. Weltkrieg entwarf Churchill in seiner Eigenschaft als Erster Seelord den Plan, durch Öffnung der Dardanellen den Russen Unterstützung zu bringen, wobei er vornehmlich seine “Kolonialen” (Australier, Neuseeländer usw.) ausnutzte. Der Angriff auf Gallipoli wurde ein Fiasko und brachte den Ersten Seelord zu Fall. Schwerwiegender und unheilvoller noch waren seine Intrigen bei der Versenkung der Lusitania am 8. Mai 1915.

Er war mit dem damaligen Untersekretär der amerikanischen Flotte, Franklin Roosevelt, in eine Verschwörung verwickelt, durch die Versenkung des Cunardriesen (Cunard = bedeutende englische Reederei, d. V.) Amerika in den Krieg zu zerren. Die Deutsche Botschaft in New York hatte der Presse zwei mal Warnungen vor dem Luxusdampfer ausgegeben, weil er Konterbande und Munition enthielt. Die Deutschen konnten zudem darauf hinweisen, daß die Lusitania in einen bewaffneten Handelsdampfer umgebaut war und daß sich eine Kompanie Soldaten nebst Artillerie und Munition an Bord befände.

[Bild] RMS Lusitania (nach dem alten römischen Reiches Name für die Provinz, die heute den Namen Portugal benannt). RMS Lusitania war ein britischer Ozeandampfer, Inhaber der Blaue Band und kurz größte Schiff der Welt. Sie wurde von der Cunard Line im Jahre 1907 ins Leben gerufen, in einer Zeit des harten Wettbewerbs für den Nordatlantik Handel. Im Jahr 1915 wurde sie von einem Torpedo von einem deutschen U-Boot zu schlagen. Anschließend werden die Munition wurde das Schiff heimlich trägt explodierte verursacht den Tod von 1.198 Passagieren und Besatzung.

[Bild] (links) Die offizielle Warnung von der kaiserlichen deutschen Botschaft über das Reisen auf Lusitania ausgestellt.

(Rechts) Ein Plakat Iren drängen, um den Untergang der Lusitania rächen.

Am 17. April 1915 verließ Liverpool Lusitania auf ihrer 201. Atlantiküberquerung, Ankunft in New York am 24. April. Eine Gruppe von Deutsch-Amerikaner, in der Hoffnung, um Kontroversen zu vermeiden, wenn Lusitania wurden von einem U-Boot angegriffen, diskutierten ihre Anliegen mit einem Vertreter der deutschen Botschaft. Die Botschaft beschlossen, die Passagiere vor ihrer nächsten Kreuzung nicht an Bord Lusitania segeln zu warnen. Die kaiserliche Botschaft platziert eine Warnung Anzeige in 50 amerikanischen Zeitungen, unter anderem in New York:

HINWEIS!

TRAVELLERS die beabsichtigen, an der Atlantikfahrt begeben werden daran erinnert, dass ein Kriegszustand zwischen Deutschland und seine Verbündeten und Großbritannien und seine Verbündeten besteht; dass die Zone des Krieges gehören die Gewässer um die britischen Inseln; dass im Einklang mit Mahnschreiben von der kaiserlichen deutschen Regierung gegeben, die die Flagge von Großbritannien, oder einen seiner Verbündeten, unterliegen Zerstörung in diesen Gewässern, und dass Reisende Segeln im Kriegsgebiet auf den Schiffen von Großbritannien oder ihre Verbündeten, tun dies auf eigene Gefahr.

IMPERIAL Deutsche Botschaft

Washington, D.C., 22. April 1915.

————————————————————-

Es war Routine, daß Linienschiffe von der Südküste Irlands ab von mindestens einem leichten Kreuzer und zwei Zerstörern begleitet wurden. Am 6. Mai erhielt Kapitän WT Turner die Warnung, daß deutsche U‑Boote an der Südküste Irlands gemeldet waren. Er erwartete demzufolge, daß er seinen Kurs um die Nordküste Irlands verlegen dürfe. Normalerweise kümmerte der Erste Lord sich nicht um solche Dinge. Doch Churchill erließ Befehl, die Lusitania ohne Geleitschutz nach Liverpool laufen zu lassen. Er reiste dann nach Paris, wo er sich als Mr. L. Spencer ins Gästebuch eines Hotels eintrug.

[Bild] Commander William Thomas Turner (1856 – 1933) war der Kapitän der Lusitania, als im Mai 1915. Abgebildet sank hier an Bord der Aquitania 1914.

Um 14.12 Uhr des 8. Mai feuerte Kapitänleutnant. Schwieger, Kommandant von U-­20, seinen letzten Torpedo in den Bug der Lusitania.

[Bild] Walther Schwieger (7. April 1885, Berlin – 5. September 1917, Nordsee) war ein Offizier der Kaiserlichen Marine (Kaiserliche Marine) und einem U-Boot-Kommandant im Ersten Weltkrieg, bekannt für seine Rolle in der Untergang die RMS Lusitania.

Die Deutschen konnten deutlich eine zweite Explosion beobachten. Die mit Doppelwänden ausgestattete Lusitania galt als unversenkbar, aber sie verschwand binnen 20 Minuten in den Fluten. In der gerichtlichen Untersuchung wollte man feststellen, daß die zweite Explosion von Kohlenstaub hergerührt habe. Aber spätere Untersuchungen ergaben, daß es kaum Kohlenstaub auf dem Schiff gab und zweifellos nicht vorne am Bug. Diese Explosion mußte also von der Explosion mehrerer Tonnen Explosivstoffe im Vorderrumpf herrühren.

Beim Untergang des Schiffes waren 1.198 Passagiere und Mannschaften ums Leben gekommen, einschließlich 171 einflußreicher Amerikaner. Der Dampfer war nur 10 Meilen von Kinsdale Head, in Sicht von Queenstown, gesunken. Patrouillenboote verblieben jedoch so lange im Hafen, bis jede Hilfe zu spät kam.

Die Untersuchung hatte schwerwiegende Fakten unterschlagen, besonders die Rolle Churchills und die vermutliche von Roosevelt. Churchill war übrigens stets der Meinung, in Roosevelt einen Freund zu besitzen. In Wirklichkeit verachtete Roosevelt ihn zusammen mit seinem zerfallenden Empire.

Genau wie Kitchener ihn beurteilt hatte, benutzte Churchill die Armee wiederum als Sprungbrett als er am 18. Nov. 1915 als Major in die Queen’s Own Oxfordshire Hussars eintrat. Nach seiner Ankunft in Frankreich wurde er Sir John French vorgestellt, der ihm die Führung einer Brigade anvertrauen wollte. Premier Asquith, dem dies zu Ohren kam, war nicht von dieser Idee begeistert. French entschloß sich daraufhin, Churchill zum 2. Bataillon der Grenadier Guards zu versetzen, um Erfahrung im Grabenkrieg zu sammeln. Churchill verbrachte nur fünf Tage bei den Guards. Bei seiner Abmeldung äußerte der Oberst:

“Wir wollen nicht unhöflich erscheinen, aber ich darf sagen, daß Ihr Auftreten bei uns eine Sache war, bei der wir nicht mitzureden hatten.”

[Bild] Churchill, Mitte, in Uniform mit Kollegen.

Churchill wanderte nun von Hauptquartier zu Hauptquartier, in der Hoffnung, doch noch das Kommando über eine Brigade zu erhalten. Diese Sucht zu kommandieren sollte im 2. Weltkrieg zu traurigen Ergebnissen führen. Am Neujahrstag 1916 übertrug man ihm das Kommando über das 21. Batl. der Royal Scots Füsiliere. Während der 3 1/2 Monate dieses Einsatzes lag seine Einheit abseits von gefährlichen Frontabschnitten. So konnte er die meiste Zeit auf seine “parlamentarischen Pflichten” verwenden. Nach dem 6. Mai 1916 sah er keinen Frontdienst mehr. Am 22. Juli 1917 wurde er Munitionsminister. Wieder einmal hatte ihm die Armee gute Dienste geleistet.

Churchill immer gedacht, dass er einen Freund in Roosevelt, der in der Tat verachtet den Mann und seine “dekadenten” Reich hatte.

Churchills politischer Stern stieg und sank über die Kriegsjahre. Seine Nachkriegsbemühungen, die Weißrussen zu unterstützen, fanden bei den kriegsmüden Soldaten wenig Verständnis, die inzwischen von der Aristokratie aller Länder genug hatten. Im Jahr 1922 wurde er zum Kolonialsekretär für den Nahen Osten ernannt. Beeinflußt von seiner aus jüdischen Kreisen stammenden Mutter, spielte er eine bedeutende Rolle bei der Unterstützung der Balfour Declaration, die die mit England verbündeten Araber verriet und eine großzügige Einwanderung von Juden nach Palästina gewährte. In Churchills Augen war der Zionismus eine “mitreißende Bewegung”, und er schrieb:

“Falls in unserer Generation, wie es wahrscheinlich ist, an den Ufern des Jordan ein jüdischer Staat, geschützt durch die englische Krone entstehen sollte, der zwischen drei und vier Millionen Juden umfaßt, so wird ein Ereignis in der Weltgeschichte eingetreten sein, das von jeder Seite betrachtet, gewinnbringend und besonders in Harmonie mit den Interessen des britischen Empire sein wird.”

Jawohl! Er lebte lange genug, um die jüdische Immigration nach Palästina verfolgen zu können, und wie am 22. Juli 1946 die Sternbande (jüdisch-zionistische Terrorgruppe, d. V.) das King David Hotel, Hauptquartier der 6. Luftlandedivision in die Luft jagte, wobei 91 Soldaten, die einst als Befreier in der Normandie abgesprungen waren, getötet wurden.

[Bild] 2. Juli 1946: Das King David Hotel in Jerusalem wurde von Juden bombardiert, tötete 91 Menschen. Menachem Begin geplant die Zerstörung des King David Hotel und das Massaker von Deir Yassin. Ex-Premier, Shamir, war ursprünglich ein Mitglied der jüdischen Terrorist Bande genannt Irgun, die von keinem anderen als Menachem Begin geleitet wurde. Shamir später ging zur noch radikaleren “Stern-Bande”, die viele bösartige Greueltaten begangen.

Am 27. März versuchte Churchill, den Emir Abdulla zu bestechen, den Juden den Zuzug nach Palästina zu gestatten. Aber Abdulla warnte ihn, daß es das Ziel der Zionisten sei, ein jüdisches Königreich in Palästina zu begründen, um von dort nach und nach die Welt zu beherrschen. Die Engländer könnten eines Tages in die Lage versetzt werden, Deutschland und Rußland um Hilfe anzugehen.

Als Kolonialminister empfing Churchill seine ersten Eindrücke, daß die Kolonien selbstbewußter geworden und nicht mehr willens waren, blindlings dem Rufe Englands zu folgen. Doch er zog es vor, diese Entwicklung zu übersehen. Zuerst fragten die Kanadier an, ob es Churchills Absicht sei, den Juden die Regierungskontrolle in Palästina zu überlassen. Churchill antwortete, daß, falls die Juden die Mehrheit gewinnen würden, wie er es wünschte, sie natürlich auch die Regierungsgewalt bekommen würden. Im Jahre 1922 wurde England wegen der Gallipoli‑Halbinsel und der Dardanellen in einen Konflikt mit der Türkei verwickelt.  Am 9. September, die Türken eingegeben Smyrna, und griechische Herrschaft in Kleinasien zu Ende ging. Die 1000 britischen Truppen auf der asiatischen Seite der Dardanellen waren, um zur Halbinsel Gallipoli von Canakkale zurückziehen, aber später durch Aufträge aus dem lokalen Kommandanten blieb.

Sowohl Lloyd George wie Churchill wollten die Türken aus Europa heraushalten. Churchill schickte ein Telegramm an alle Dominien mit der Forderung, militärische Verstärkungen zu entsenden.

[Bild]  Lloyd George und Churchill (1922)

Die Haltung der Dominien zu dieser Forderung Churchills war unterschiedlich. Neufundland und Neuseeland boten ihre Unterstützung an, aber sowohl die kanadische wie die australische Regierung waren ungehalten darüber, daß sie vor Veröffentlichung dieser Forderung nicht einmal konsultiert worden waren. Der australische Premierminister [Billy Hughes] telegrafierte nach London:

“Für eine gute Sache sind wir bereit, alles zu geben, für eine schlechte nicht einen Mann!”

Auch Kanada weigerte sich, Truppen zu entsenden. Churchill gingen nie die wahren Hintergründe dieser Weigerungen auf. Auch später als Premierminister bildete er sich ein, noch immer volle Verfügungsgewalt über seine “Kolonialen” zu haben.

[Bild] Generalstreik, Mai 1956 in Stratford Broadway, England.

Churchill war ein Mann, dem am Los des einfachen Engländers wenig gelegen war. Während des Generalstreiks im Mai 1926 war er Finanzminister und nebenbei noch Schriftleiter der British Gazette. Seine Zeitung war die einzige, die während des Streiks erscheinen konnte. Darin nannte er die Streikenden “den Feind” und verlangte dessen bedingungslose Kapitulation! Seine gewerkschafts‑ und arbeiterfeindliche Einstellung waren der Grund zu ausgedehnten Streiks und Sabotageakten auch in der Rüstungsindustrie. Sie führten schließlich zu seiner politischen Niederlage in den Wahlen von 1945. Als Finanzminister schlug er Vorschläge für die Verbesserung der englischen Schulen und Arbeiterwohnungen in den Wind. Er stellte auch weiterhin eine seiner schlechtesten Eigenschaften zur Schau. Wie in einem Brief von Lord Milner an Herbert Samuel beschrieben:

“Er war immer vorschnell in seinen Entschlüssen, ohne über die nötigen Kenntnisse zu verfügen.”

Als er nicht mehr im Amt war, stürzte Churchill sich in Schulden. Darüber hinaus wurde er noch in Verleumdungsklagen verwickelt. Seinem Privatsekretär, Martin Gilbert, gegenüber hatte er einmal geäußert:

“Gib mir die Tatsachen, und ich werde sie so verdrehen, daß sie zu meinen Argumenten passen.”

Sein Kommentar war Gegenstand von Antony Cave-Brown zwei Bänden, Bodyguard of Lies [Leibwächter, der niemals lebte].

Obwohl er Finanzminister gewesen war, war Churchill unfähig, seine eigenen Finanzen in Ordnung zu halten. Durch seine Trunksucht, seine Schulden und seine jüdische Mutter geriet er an eine Clique und wurde ihr hörig, die später unter dem Namen FOCUS bekannt wurde.

Der Präsident der Anglo‑Jüdischen Association, Leonard Montefiore, erkannte in Churchill das perfekte Sprachrohr für seine Gruppe: Ein Mann mit einem Namen, mit Beziehungen, ein Zionist und ‑ tietverschuldet. Montefiore wandte sich an Churchill wegen der Behandlung der Juden in Deutschland, obwohl die Juden in den meisten Ländern Europas von ähnlichen Mißständen betroffen waren. Churchill sagte der Guppe seine Unterstützung zu, trotz der Tatsache, daß er früher einmal eine anglo-deutsche Entente befürwortet hatte. Die anglo‑jüdische Gruppe nannte sich später Anti‑Nazi‑Council. Es war daher nicht verwunderlich, daß die Nazis und auch das deutsche Volk Anstoß an Fremden nahmen, die sich in innerdeutsche Angelegenheiten mischten.

[Bild] LEONARD G. MONTEFIORE, O .B .E .

Da der Name Anti‑Nazi vielen Engländern mißfiel, wurde er in FOCUS abgeändert. Unter Sir Henry Wickham Steed und dem neuen Namen fanden sich Menschen verschiedener politischer wie ethnischer Herkunft zusammen. Prominente neue Mitglieder waren Sir Walter Citrine vom Gewerkschaftskongreß bis zu Sir Robert Waley‑Cohen, dem Vorsitzer von Shell Oil. Im Verlauf seines Wachstums rekrutierte FOCUS Gewerkschaftsführer wie Manager, Juden und Nichtjuden, darunter Josiah Wedgewood, Sir Henry Strakosch, ein südafrikanischer Minenmillionär und Vorsitzer von Union Corporation Limited, ein in Mähren geborener Jude.

[Bild] Sir Robert Waley Cohen, KBE (8. September 1877 – 27. November 1952) war ein britischer Industrieller und prominenter Führer der Anglo-Judentums.

 Andere Mitglieder waren Dr. Chaim Weizmann, von dem wir noch weiter hören werden, David Ben Gurion, Simon Marks und Israel Moses Sief von Marks und Spencer, Lord Melchett und Nathan Laski, um nur einige zu nennen. Interessanterweise gehörte zeitweilig, obwohl kein Jude, auch Captain Basil Liddell‑Hart, der bekannte Militärschriftsteller, zu diesem Kreis.

Als Churchills Schulden weiter anwuchsen, schrieb er für viele von Juden beherrschte Zeitungen. Trotzdem konnte er seine laufenden Unkosten nicht begleichen. Seine Lage verschlimmerte sich noch weiter, als er für $ 200.000 von der amerikanischen Zeitschrift TABLOID [The Enquirer] wegen einer Diffamierung verklagt wurde. Er musste seine Familienbesitz, Chartwell anzubieten, zu verkaufen. Obige Summe und seine übrigen Schulden wurden von seinem jüdischen Freund Sir Henry Strakosch und anderen Mitgliedern von FOCUS übernommen. Er war jetzt nicht nur an diese Leute gebunden; er kam unter die Kontrolle des Anti‑Nazi-Council, und all seine Reden und Schriften waren nun folgerichtig gegen die Hitlerbedrohung und die schlechte Behandlung der Juden durch die Nazis gerichtet.

[Bild] Chartwell war der Haupt Erwachsenen Haus von Sir Winston Churchill. Churchill und seine Frau Clementine kaufte das Grundstück, befindet sich zwei Meilen südlich von Westerham, Kent, England, im Jahre 1922 (Hinweis: die Menora im Garten ist nicht wirklich da.)

Churchill bestätigte “Milner’s Beobachtung” auch während der Münchenkrise, als er eine Gelegenheit sah, den Krieg gegen Hitler zu starten. Der Ausbildungsgrad und die geographische Position der regulären englischen Armee störten ihn dabei wenig. Sein Plan war, Frankreich und die Dominien seine Schlachten schlagen zu lassen, um schließlich auch die USA in den Krieg gegen Deutschland zu hetzen. Sowohl Chamberlain wie Hore-Belisha kannten den Zustand von Englands Streitkräften, die zu einem solchen Kampf nicht in der Lage waren.

Wichtiger noch, Churchill ignorierte die Tatsache, daß Polen schon rund 10 Jahre mit der Tschechoslowakei in Streit lag. Er übersah, daß, falls Rußland der Tschechoslowakei zu Hilfe eilen möchte, es entweder in Polen oder Rumänien oder beide Staaten einfallen müsse und daß England mit beiden Ländern Verträge zu deren Unterstützung im Falle eines Angriffs hatte. Das Ergebnis wäre gewesen, daß England und Deutschland gegen Rußland stehen würden. Churchill zog ebenfalls die mögliche Handlungsweise des jüngsten Achsenpartners, Japan, nicht in Rechnung. Ferner erkannte er nicht, daß abgesehen vom allgemein starken Wunsch nach Frieden, die meisten Staaten in Stalins Kommunismus eine größere Bedrohung als die von Hitler , und die meisten Hitler als ein Bollwerk gegen Stalin sahen.

Deutschland am Ende war ich von einem Mob von Streitereien, instabile Staaten mit jeweils großen Massen von Deutschen umgeben.

Nichtsdestotrotz verurteilte Churchill Chamberlain, weil er bei der Sudetenkrise nicht zum Krieg aufrief. Aber irgendwie würde er seinen Krieg bekommen und seine Wohltäter zufriedenstellen.

Erst nach der Zerstörung von Deutschland hat er die reale Bedrohung erkennen, als er sagte, um Gen. Hastings Lionel “Pug” Ismay (erste Baron Ismay):

“Wir haben das falsche Schwein getötet!”

Sowohl die Medien und Churchill wählte Chamberlain Aktionen in München falsch darstellen.

Gegen Ende des Jahres 1938 fielen die Polen in die Provinz Teschen (Oktober 1938 Annexion des Olsagebiets, d. V.) ein, während die Deutschen ins Sudetenland einmarschierten, das zu 90% deutsch, aber durch Woodrow Wilson der Tschechoslowakei zugesprochen worden war. Der Rest der Tschechoslowakei wurde von deren Nachbarn, einschließlich Ungarn, aufgeteilt. Alfred Duff-Cooper, ein überzeugter Zionist und Mitglied im Fokus, trat als erster Lord der Admiralität aus Protest für Chamberlain nicht mit, um Krieg mit Deutschland (und möglicherweise Poland) gegangen, über Sudetenland.

[Bild] Churchill und Duff Cooper

Churchill sieht über die Schulter des Alfred Duff Cooper, der Informationsminister. Cooper, Churchills Freund und politischen Verbündeten, wurde wieder in das Kabinett nach seiner sehr öffentlichen Rücktritt als Erster Lord der Admiralität aus Protest gegen Chamberlains Politik auf die Tschechoslowakei gebracht. Später wurde er der Zusammenarbeit mit den Freien Französisch Kräfte und war Botschafter in Frankreich nach der Befreiung 1944.

Gegen Ende März [1939] fielen tschechische Truppen in Preßburg ein und setzten seinen Präsidenten, Pfarrer Tiso, ab. Die Slowakei und Ruthenien (Ruthenen = Ukrainer im Gebiet Ost-Galizien, Nordost-Ungarn und Teilen der Bukowina, d. V.) erklärten nun ihre Unabhängigkeit von dem vom Völkerbund geschaffenen Kunstgebilde, von dem David Lloyd George gesagt hatte:

“Ich kann mir keinen ärgeren künftigen Kriegsgrund vorstellen als daß das deutsche Volk von einem Mob von Kleinstaaten eingeschlossen sein soll, von denen viele aus Völkern bestehen, die in der Vergangenheit nie selbst in der Lage waren, stabile Regierungen zu stellen und die sämtlich große Minderheiten von Deutschen einschließen.”

Aus Furcht vor einem Bürgerkrieg unterzeichnete (15. März 1939), Präsident Hacha ein Abkommen, das Deutschland den Schutz von Böhmen und Mähren übertrug. Ungarische Truppen überschritten die Grenze zu Ruthenien und vertrieben die tschechischen Einheiten. Dieser Wirrwar wurde von der englischen Presse verfälscht oder unterschlagen. Was das englische Volk, die Dominien und die ganze Welt dagegen zu hören bekam, war, daß Hitler die gesamte Tschechoslowakei geschluckt hatte.

Obwohl sämtliche Mitglieder des Völkerbundes zugestanden, daß der polnische Korridor rechtmäßig zu Deutschland gehörte, verfocht Churchill hinter Chamberlains Rücken. die Forderung, daß England wegen Polen den Krieg eröffne, obwohl Austen Chamberlain, der englische Außenminister erklärt hatte, daß der polnische Korridor nicht einen englischen Unteroffizier wert sei! Doch Churchill und Focus erkannten ihre Chance, den Krieg gegen die Nazis zu starten, deren Aufwertung und Besserung des Loses deutscher Arbeiter ihnen und den meisten Westmächten ein Dorn im Auge war. Polens Souveränität war das letzte, was Churchill und FOCUS im Sinne hatten, besonders nachdem Polen sich am Einfall in die Tschechei beteiligt hatte.

Dem englischen und französischen Volk lag nichts ferner als ein neuer blutiger Krieg wegen eines abgelegenen und unbekannten Landes. Doch dank FOCUS und Churchill wurden England und Frankreich und letztlich die Welt in einen Krieg gedrängt, den niemand wollte und der nichts als Unheil bringen sollte!

[Bild] Schlagzeilen, als Großbritannien und in Kürze folgen, Frankreich, erklären Deutschland den Krieg.

Am 3. September 1939 erklärte England Deutschland den Krieg. Churchill wurde zum Ersten Lord der Admiralität ernannt. Er erließ einen Funkspruch an alle Einheiten der Royal Navy: “Winston is back”. Aber die Freude über Churchills Ernennung in der Flotte war nicht groß, zumal Churchill sich benahm, als wäre er auch zum Kriegsminister bestimmt worden. Er fing an, Befehle auch an andere Truppengattungen auszugeben. Sein erster Befehl als Erster Lord erging an die Royal Air Force, die deutschen Kriegshäfen in Wilhelmshaven und Brunsbüttel anzugreifen.

Von 29 Blenheim‑ und Wellingtonbombern verfehlten zehn das Ziel und kehrten um. Eine der Maschinen bombardierte Esbjerg, eine Stadt in Dänemark ca. 170 km vom Angriffsziel entfernt. Drei Maschinen griffen eigene Schiffe in der Nordsee an, sieben wurden von der Flak abgeschossen. Nur acht Bomber fanden das Ziel und griffen das Schlachtschiff Scheer mit drei nicht scharf gemachten Bomben an, ohne Schaden. für das Schiff. Der Kreuzer Emden erhielt einige Treffer. Der einzig wirkliche Schaden entstand durch den Absturz einer der Bomber auf den Kreuzer. Die Treffsicherheit der RAF verbesserte sich nur unerheblich während der nächsten zwei Jahre.

MAJOR MERVYN F. THURGOOD ist Autor Um die Feinde und die Herausgeber der ein Symposium zu dem Zweiten Weltkrieg zu bestrafen. Er ist auch Autor eines viel längere Version dieses Artikels, dass bastard Chill berechtigt, geboren 1923 in British Columbia, serviert Thurgood mit dem Seaforth Highlanders kanadische Infanterie-Regiment.

Winnie the Kriegsverbrecher:

Eine Übersicht über die Gräueltaten von Churchill Bestel

Winston Churchill geplant und Kriegsverbrechen begangen, Wegwerfen die Regeln der “zivilisierten” Kriegsführung, die im Laufe der Jahrhunderte in der westlichen Welt entwickelt worden war.

Auf der Zweiten Quebec-Konferenz (16. September 1944), Churchill und Kollegen Monster Franklin D. Roosevelt nahm die finsteren Morgenthau-Plan, der Dutzende von Millionen von Deutschen getötet worden wäre, was den Deutschen eine erschreckende Bild davon, was “bedingungslose Kapitulation” würde bedeuten, in der Praxis. Deutschen aus Ostpreußen, Oberschlesien und alle westlichen Deutschland beraubt werden, und der Rest würde in separate nördlichen und südlichen Staaten aufgeteilt werden.

Churchill war überzeugt, der Plan würde;

“Britain vor dem Bankrott zu retten, indem sie einen gefährlichen Konkurrenten.”

Die Schätzung, dass Millionen sofort beim Einatmen sterben, und weitere Millionen würden später zu erliegen, in Betracht gezogen Chill fallen Zehntausende von Anthrax-Bomben auf die Zivilbevölkerung und bestellte eine detaillierte Planung für einen chemischen Angriff auf sechs deutschen Großstädten.

Seine größte Kriegsverbrechen beteiligt den Teppich-Bombardierung deutscher Städte, die 600.000 Zivilisten getötet und rund 800.000 verletzt. [Hinweis: rund 40.000 Briten während der Blitz getötet] Churchill angelogen des House of Commons und der Öffentlichkeit und behauptete, nur militärische und Industrieanlagen wurden gezielt, während das eigentliche Ziel war es, so viele Zivilisten wie möglich zu töten.

Tausend Jahre alten Stadtkultur wurde vernichtet, als große Städte, in den Annalen der Wissenschaft und Kunst berühmt wurden, um schwelende Trümmer. Churchill und Roosevelt waren zerstört mehr als Attila.

Dresden wurde mit Flüchtlingen um ihr Leben rennen von der Roten Armee aufgefüllt. Der Krieg war praktisch über. Aber für drei Tage und Nächte, vom 13 bis 15 Februar 1945 regnete britischen Bomben auf den wehrlosen Stadt, tötete 135.000 Menschen oder mehr.

Die Bombardierung von Deutschland und Tötung von Zivilisten weiterhin erst Mitte April 1945 nur zu stoppen, weil es nicht mehr links, um Ziele bombardiert werden.

— JOHN TIFFANY

———————————-

Fußnoten

[1] Hier ist ein kleiner “heroischen” wegen Churchills “Flucht” aus der Buren aus den Seiten 44 genommen – 45 von  Hidden History — The Secret Origins of the First World War [Hidden History – Die geheimen Anfänge des Ersten Weltkrieges] von Gerry Docherty und Jim Macgregor:

Winston Churchill hatte in Südafrika als Kriegsberichterstatter für die konservative Morning Post im Jahr 1899 übergeben und landete in einem Boer Gefangenenkriegsgefangenenlager. Die Geschichte, und es wurde weitgehend seine, leitet sich von Churchills Autobiographie. [57] Nach eigenen Angaben eine Aufklärungsmission an Bord eines gepanzerten Zug wurde er am 15. November 1899 und wurde zusammen mit rund 60 britische Offiziere und Soldaten gefangen genommen, als die Buren angegriffen. Getroffen, um Pretoria, sie in einer alten Schule mit einem zehn Meter hohen Wellblechwand umgeben abgehalten wurden. Churchill gab einen Bericht über die Entgleisung und seine Folgemaßnahmen bei der Herstellung einer “waghalsige Flucht” zu anderen Journalisten. The Daily Telegraph gedruckt eine Depesche von Reuters titelte “Mr. Churchill Mut und Coolness als herrliche beschrieben”. Der Held selbst erstellt.

Was lief nicht gemeldet war, dass nach seiner Internierung Churchill selbst als Nicht-Kombattant der Begründung, dass er Journalist war Kleinanzeigen wollte. Er nutzte seine Verbindungen, um einen Bettelbrief an Alfred Milner am 24. November senden fordern, dass er in einer Liste von Gefangenen einbezogen werden, um freigegeben und sagte, dass er seine Mutter gebeten hatte, um ihn durch Milner zu schreiben. [58] Er legte auch Anfragen nach seiner Freilassung am 26. November und 8. Dezember, [59] und versprach, dass:

“wenn ich entlassen werde ich keine Bewährung, die ich nicht kann erforderlich, um gegen die republikanischen Kräfte dienen zu geben”. [60]

Am 12. Dezember einigten sich die Boer commander-in-chief, ihn freizulassen, und einige Zeit danach Chill wurde nie wieder im Lager gesehen.

Bei seiner Ankunft in der nachfolgenden portugiesischen Hafen von Lourenco Marques Chill weitergeleitet ein fantastisches Abenteuer. Er behauptete, durch die Umzäunung unter den Augen der Wachen Boer geschnitten haben und machte einen gewundenen Weg in die Freiheit. Seine “waghalsige Flucht” wurde legendär. Auf eigene Faust und nicht in der Lage, entweder Afrikaans oder Kaffir sprechen, aber durch die überraschend große Summe von £ 75 (im Wert von über £ 6.000 in der heutigen Währung) gestärkt, machte er die 250-Meile Reise in den sicheren Hafen von Lourenco Marques. Seine Odyssee war würdig jeder griechischen Helden des antiken Mythos. Crossing gefährliche Terrain und Ausweichen der schwer bewaffneten Boer Kommandos, die die Jagd auf ihn, schließlich kam er zu einer Eisenbahnstrecke und sprang auf einen Zug, wie es donnerte vorbei. Dies muss mit erheblichen Schwierigkeiten wurden “zum Teil wegen seiner Schulter ausgerenkt” erreicht haben,. [61]

In einer anderen kriecherisch Konto wird Churchill gesagt haben:

“stürzte sich auf einen Lastwagen, und nach einem qualvollen Kampf gelang hockend auf den Kupplungen zwischen zwei Wagen zu bleiben”. [62]

Innerhalb kürzester Zeit jedoch zwang ihn Durst auf der Suche nach Wasser Sprung aus. Kriecht auf dem Bauch, schleppte er sich durch Sümpfe, bevor er über den Boer Township von Witbank. Er war unglaublich glücklich, an der Tür des “die einzige Familie, für 20 Meilen, wo er nicht übergeben worden” klopfen. [63] Nach drei Tagen im Versteck, die angeblich in der Gesellschaft von Ratten ab einem Bergwerksschacht, bekam er an Bord einer anderen Eisenbahnwagen und selbst unter Wollballen versteckt. Es war der Zug nach Delagoabai, Freiheit und “einer Flamme der Triumph”. [64] Das ist, wie Churchill seine Geschichte erzählte.

Kontroverse hing um sein Konto wie die Ratten in seiner Bergwerksschacht. Es gab Vorwürfe, dass er egoistisch und schlecht, indem Sie auf eigene Faust und die Schaffung einer solchen selbstsüchtigen Werbung benommen hatte. Glück und entschlossen Gerichtsverfahren jedoch scheinen solche Vorbehalte entfernt haben. Britische Offiziere im Lager, Captain Haldane, Sergeant Brockie und Lieutenants le Mesurier und Frankland fühlte er ihre Chancen der Freiheit ruiniert. Haldanes Ansprüche wurden durch seine Weigerung, vor Gericht auf Churchills Namen in einer Verleumdungsklage gegen Blackwoods Magazine im Jahr 1912. Trotz dieser Gegenteil Stimmen erscheinen gestärkt, seine “waghalsige Flucht” gedreht Chill in eine öffentliche Held und begabt ihm einen konservativen Sitz für Oldham in der Parlamentswahlen nur ein paar Monate später.

___________________________

Versionsgeschichte & Hinweise

Version 1: Veröffentlicht 20. Juli 2015

__________________

Aufzeichnungen

* Google Translate hat für einige Teile des Dokumentes verwendet. Wenn Leser finden keine wesentlichen Fehler bitte lassen Sie mich in den Kommentaren meines Blogs wissen.

* Bilder nicht in das Originaldokument.

* Fußnoten sind nicht in dem Originaldokument.

* Titelbild ist nicht Teil des ursprünglichen Dokuments.

Notes

* Google Translate has been used for some parts of this document. If readers find any significant errors please let me know in the comments section of my blog.

* Images not in the original document.

* Footnotes are not in the original document.

* Cover image is not part of the original document.

__________________

Knowledge is Power in Our Struggle for Racial Survival

(Information that should be shared with as many of our people as possible — do your part to counter Jewish control of the mainstream media — pass it on and spread the word) … Val Koinen at KOINEN’S CORNER

======================================

Versionsgeschichte

Version 2: Jun 3, 2020 — Re-uploaded images and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version.

Version 1: Veröffentlicht 20. Juli 2015

[Click to enlarge]

That Blackguard

Winston Churchill

The Barnes Review — 2012 January – February

ILLUSTRATION: RICHARD COLE I DRAWN & QUARTERED/NEWSCOM

& KATANA

THE ARTICLE IS EXCERPTED FROM A BOOKLET boldly entitled That Bastard Churchill, by patriotic writer Maj. M.E Thurgood. It is a blistering expose of Winston Churchill’s lack of humanity and chivalry in war, his bad temper and bizarre habits, and his insatiable lust for alcohol — washed down with a good dose of Christian blood. Decades of propaganda have millions of people believing Churchill was some kind of an English savior when, in fact, he was the architect of the destruction of the British empire.

By MAJOR MERVYN F. THURGOOD

[Image] A young Winston Churchill (1881).

Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill was born in 1874, son of Lord Randolph Churchill, the third son of the duke of Marlborough. Winston Churchill was educated at Harrow and after three attempts gained entrance to Sandhurst Military College. His forte was English, but he was innumerate and graduated near the foot of his class.

[Image] Winston Churchill entered Sandhurst in 1893 as a cavalry cadet.

While at Sandhurst, he was accused of committing an act of gross immorality of the “Oscar Wilde” type. Churchill brought suit against the father of one of the cadets who accused him, A. C. Bruce-Pryce. The charges were withdrawn, and Churchill received 400 pounds in damages. No sooner was that incident over than Churchill became involved in a steeplechase fraud, and he and his cohorts became the target of a tabloid called Truth.

[Image] December 1894 at the age of 20, Winston left Sandhurst as a cavalry officer in the 4th Hussars.

In 1895, Churchill and a friend, Reginald Barnes, went to Cuba and spent some six weeks with the Spanish forces, sending daily reports to the Daily Graphic. 

[Image] The Graphic was a British weekly illustrated newspaper, first published on 4 December 1869 by William Luson Thomas’s company Illustrated Newspapers Limited.

In 1895, Churchill, and fellow officer Reginald Barnes, travelled to Cuba to observe the Spanish fight the Cuban guerrillas; he had obtained a commission to write about the conflict from the Daily Graphic.

Churchill become more interested in being a writer than a soldier but realized that the army would be a good foundation for political life and joined the Malakand Field Force on the North West Frontier and on occasion enjoined in skirmishes with Afridis, who, despite Churchill’s reports of heavy fighting, only threw stones at the British. Churchill’s next military exploit was in 1898 at Omdurman with the 21st Lancers under Kitchener, advancing on Khartoum. Here again his military energies were directed to writing for the Times and the Morning Post.

Lord Kitchener was to say of him that he had grit enough but only used the army as a convenience and could secure postings that would suit his purpose through his mother. He served in South Africa for part of a year, from 1899 to 1900, as a war correspondent, and his claim to fame was that he had been taken prisoner and had escaped. [1]

[Image] Winston Churchill (right with hands behind his back). Picture taken three days after his capture by the Boers.

[Image] When Churchill escaped from the PoW camp, a wanted poster was issued, offering £25 (dead or alive) for his recapture.

He was elected MP for Oldham as a Conservative in 1900 at the age of 26, but joined the Liberals in 1904 and attained cabinet rank: as president of the Board of Trade in 1908. He became home secretary in 1910 and was made first lord of the Admiralty in 1911. Which of course, brings to mind Gilbert and Sullivan’s HMS Pinafore,:

“Stick close to your desk and never go to sea, and you may be the leader of the queen’s na-vee!”

 

[Image] Winston Churchill rather enjoyed war.

In July 1914, as Britain prepared for the oncoming catastrophe, Churchill, at the time the First Lord of the Admiralty, wrote to his wife;

‘I am interested, geared up and happy. Is it not horrible to be built like that?’

And in 1916, in a letter to David Lloyd George’s daughter, Churchill admitted:

“I think a curse should rest on me — because I love this war. I know it’s smashing and shattering the lives of thousands every moment, and yet, I can’t help it, I enjoy every second of it’.

In his capacity as first lord of the Admiralty, he devised a plan to bring support to the Russians by opening up the Dardanelles by the army, using mostly colonials, the ANZACs. The attack on Gallipoli was a disaster, and it was here that Churchill blotted his copybook. But far deeper and more sinister was his role in the sinking of the Lusitania on May 8, 1915.

Churchill was linked with the then-undersecretary of the U.S. Navy, Franklin D. Roosevelt, in a conspiracy to bring America into the war by sinking the Cunard liner out of New York. Twice the German Embassy in New York issued warnings in the U.S. press against sailing on the ill-fated liner, which, the Germans claimed was carrying contraband and munitions and was being converted to an armed merchant ship. It was also known that it would be carrying about one company of soldiers, field guns and ammunition.

[Image] RMS LUSITANIA, (named after the old Roman Empire’s name for the province which is now called Portugal). RMS Lusitania was a British ocean liner, holder of the Blue Riband and briefly the world’s biggest ship. She was launched by the Cunard Line in 1907, at a time of fierce competition for the North Atlantic trade. In 1915 she was hit by one torpedo by a German U-boat. Subsequently the munitions the ship was secretly carrying exploded causing the deaths of 1,198 passengers and crew.

[Image] (Left) The official warning issued by the Imperial German Embassy about travelling on Lusitania.

(Right) A poster urging Irishmen to avenge the sinking of the Lusitania.

On 17 April 1915, Lusitania left Liverpool on her 201st transatlantic voyage, arriving in New York on 24 April. A group of German–Americans, hoping to avoid controversy if Lusitania were attacked by a U-boat, discussed their concerns with a representative of the German Embassy. The embassy decided to warn passengers before her next crossing not to sail aboard Lusitania. The Imperial German Embassy placed a warning advertisement in 50 American newspapers, including those in New York:

NOTICE!

TRAVELLERS intending to embark on the Atlantic voyage are reminded that a state of war exists between Germany and her allies and Great Britain and her allies; that the zone of war includes the waters adjacent to the British Isles; that, in accordance with formal notice given by the Imperial German Government, vessels flying the flag of Great Britain, or any of her allies, are liable to destruction in those waters and that travellers sailing in the war zone on the ships of Great Britain or her allies do so at their own risk.

IMPERIAL GERMAN EMBASSY

Washington, D.C., April 22, 1915.

————————————————————-

It was normal procedure for all such liners to be escorted from the south coast of Ireland to Liverpool by at least one light cruiser and two destroyers. On the 6th of May, Capt. W.T. Turner received warning of submarines along the south coast of Ireland, and he expected to be diverted around the north coast of Ireland. The first lord of the Admiralty didn’t normally concern himself with such things, but Churchill issued orders that the Lusitania was not to be escorted to Liverpool. He then left for Paris and signed himself in at his hotel as Mr. L. Spencer.

[Image] Commander William Thomas Turner (1856 – 1933) was the captain of the Lusitania when it sunk in May 1915. Pictured here aboard the Aquitania, 1914.

At 2:12 pm on May 8 Capt. [Walther] Schwieger, commanding the submarine U-20, fired his last torpedo into the bow of the Lusitania. He witnessed two distinct explosions, as did others.

[Image] Walther Schwieger (7 April 1885, Berlin – 5 September 1917, North Sea) was an officer of the Imperial German Navy (Kaiserliche Marine) and a U-boat commander during World War I, noted for his role in the sinking of the RMS Lusitania.

The Lusitania was unsinkable and had double hulls, but it went down in 20 minutes. The inquiry stated that the second explosion came from coal dust, but recent investigations indicate that there would be little coal dust, and it was very unlikely it would be in the forward hold, and that the second explosion could only have come from several tons of explosive carried in the forward hold.

By 2:33 pm the Lusitania was gone, taking with her 1,198 of her passengers and crew including 171 influential Americans. The liner went down 10 miles off Kinsale Head within sight of Queenstown (Ireland). But patrol boats remained in the harbor until it was too late to help.

The official inquiry skirted many issues, including the role played by Churchill and possibly Roosevelt. Churchill always thought that he had a friend in Roosevelt, who in fact despised the man and his “decadent” empire.

True to Kitchener’s predictions, Churchill used the army as a convenience and enlisted as a major in the Queen’s Own Oxfordshire Hussars on the 18th of November, 1915. On his arrival in France he was taken to Sir John French, who offered him a promotion to brigadier general, to command a brigade. This did not delight the ears of Prime Minister Asquith, and French decided to send Churchill to the 2nd Battalion Grenadier Guards for experience in the trenches. Churchill only spent five days with the guards. On his leaving, the colonel would comment:

“We don’t want to be in any way inhospitable, but I think it only right to say that your coming was not a matter in which we were given any choice.”

 

[Image] Churchill, centre, in army uniform with colleagues.

Churchill meandered from headquarters to headquarters, looking for a command, hoping to eventually command a brigade. His desire to command would manifest itself with sad results in World War II. On New Year’s Day, 1916, he was given command of the 6th Bn. Royal Scots Fusiliers. During his three and one-half months in command, his unit was in no threat, and he spent most of his time working on his parliamentary duties. He saw no more of the trenches after the 6th of May 1916, and on the 22nd of July 1917, he became minister of munitions. Again the army had served him well.

Churchill always thought that he had a friend in Roosevelt, who in fact despised the man and his “decadent” empire.

Churchill’s political fortunes waxed and waned through the war, and his attempts to support the white Russians received no support from the trench weary soldiers who were now becoming disenchanted with the aristocracy of all countries. In 1922, he became colonial secretary in the Middle East and inspired by his American mother’s Jewish background, played a major role in supporting the Balfour Declaration that betrayed Britain’s Arab allies and allowed massive immigration of Jews into Palestine. He wrote Zionism is an “inspiring movement,” saying:

“If, as may well happen, there should be created, in our lifetime, by the banks of the Jordan, a Jewish state under protection of the British crown, which might comprise 3 to 4 million Jews, an event will have occurred in the history of the world which, from every point of view, would be beneficial and would be especially in harmony with the truest interests of the British empire.”

He would live to see Jewish immigration into Palestine, and on July 22, 1946, the Jewish Stern Gang blew up the King David Hotel, the headquarters of the 6th Airborne Division, killing 91 men who had jumped into Normandy to free the Jewish people.

[Image] July 2, 1946: The King David Hotel in Jerusalem was bombed by jews, killing 91 people.  Menachem Begin planned the destruction of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin. Ex-prime minister, Shamir, was originally a member of the Jewish terrorist gang called Irgun, which was headed by none other than Menachem Begin. Shamir later moved over to the even more radical “Stern Gang,” which committed many vicious atrocities.

On the March 27, Churchill tried to bribe the Emir Abdulla to allow the Jews to immigrate into Palestine but he was warned by Abdulla that the aim of the Zionists was to establish a Jewish state in Palestine and gradually control the entire world, and the British might have to call on Germany or Russia for some help.

As colonial secretary, Churchill got his first indication that the colonies were coming of age and would no longer be blindly subservient to Britain’s call. This he would ignore. First Canada asked Churchill if his aim was to give the Jews control of the government in Palestine. To this Churchill replied that if they become the majority, as he wished, naturally they would take it over. In 1922, Britain, primarily through Churchill, became involved with Turkey over the Gallipoli Peninsula and the Dardanelles. On Sept. 9, the Turks entered Smyrna, and Greek rule in Asia Minor came to an end. The 1,000 British troops on the Asiatic side of the Dardanelles were to withdraw to the Gallipoli Peninsula from Canakkale but later remained by orders from the local commander.

Both Lloyd George and Churchill supported the decision to keep the Turks out of Europe. Churchill sent a telegram to all the dominion governments to “dispatch military reinforcements.”

[Image]  Lloyd George and Churchill (1922)

The dominions varied in acceptance of Churchill’s demand. Newfoundland and New Zealand offered their support, but both the Canadian and Australian governments were furious at not even being consulted before the request was made public, and at the request itself. The Australian prime minister [Billy Hughes] telegraphed London, saying:

“In a good cause we are prepared to venture our all, in a bad one, not a single man!”

Canada would send no troops at all. Churchill never got the true implications of these refusals and later as prime minister, still felt that he had absolute command over his “colonial troops.”

[Image] General Strike, May 1956 at Stratford Broadway.

Churchill again surfaced as one who cared little for the common Englishman. It was during the general strike of May 1926, when he was chancellor of the Exchequer (minister of finance), and editor of the British Gazette. It was only his paper that appeared on the streets during the strike, in which he referred to the strikers as the enemy and demanded unconditional surrender. That same demand would prolong the war with Germany and his anti-union, anti-labor attitude would be the basis for escalating strikes and sabotage in war industries and turn him out of office in the 1945 elections. Again as chancellor of the Exchequer he turned down proposals for better schools and housing for the people Britain. He would continue to display one of his worst qualities: as described by Lord Milner in a letter to Herbert Samuel:

“He was too apt to make up his mind without sufficient knowledge.”

Out of office Churchill continued to run up debts, and, because of Milner’s observation, he became involved in libel suits. Churchill had commented to his personal secretary, Martin Gilbert [Jewish]:

“Give me the facts, and I will twist them the way I want, to suit my argument.”

His comment was the subject of Antony Cave-Brown’s two volumes, Bodyguard of Lies.

Though he had been minister of finance, Churchill could not control his own personal finances and was always in debt. It was through his drinking, debt and his Jewish mother that he became involved and beholden to a group that would eventually become known as Focus.

It first began with the president of the Anglo-Jewish Association, Leonard Montefiore, who found in Churchill a perfect spokesman for his association, a man well known, with connections, a Zionist and in debt. Montefiore approached Churchill with the plight of the Jews in Germany the Jews shared the same “plight” in nearly all countries in Europe. Churchill agreed to support the association despite the fact that Churchill had previously pushed for an Anglo German Entente. The Anglo-Jewish Association later became known as the Anti-Nazi Council. So it was not surprising that both the members of the National Socialist German Worker’s Party (the Nazis) and the German people, as a whole, took umbrage with foreigners of a certain ethnic background, interfering in strictly domestic German affairs.

[Image] LEONARD G. MONTEFIORE, O .B .E .

The name “Anti-Nazi Council” became offensive to many Britons, and the name was changed to “The Focus” under Sir Henry Wickham Steed. The change of name brought many people of different political as well as ethnic cultures together. Some of the new members were Sir Walter Citrine of the Trades Union Congress up to Sir Robert Waley-Cohen, the chairman of Shell Oil. As Focus grew it recruited both labor and management, Jew and non-Jew, including Josiah Wedgewood, Sir Henry Strakosch, a South African mining multimillionaire and chairman of Union Corp. Ltd. and a Jew, born in Moravia.

[Image] Sir Robert Waley Cohen, KBE (8 September 1877 – 27 November 1952) was a British industrialist and prominent leader of Anglo-Jewry.

Other members were Dr. Chaim Weizmann, of whom we will hear much more, David Ben Guirion, Simon Marks and Israel Moses Sief of Marks and Spencer, Lord Melchett and Nathan Laski — to mention a few. It is of interest to note that Capt. Basil Liddel-Hart, the noted strategist and military writer, was a member, though he was not a Jew.

As Churchill’s debts grew, he wrote for many Jewish-dominated newspapers but couldn’t cover his living expenses. To make matters worse, he was sued for libel by the American tabloid The Enquirer for $200,000. He now put up the family estate “Chartwell” for sale. His debts and libel problem were met by his Jewish friend Sir Henry Strakosch and other members of Focus. He was now not only beholden to, but also under the control of this Anti-Nazi Council and now all his speeches and writings were directed against the threat of Hitler and the ill treatment of the Jews by the Nazis.

[Image] Chartwell was the principal adult home of Sir Winston Churchill. Churchill and his wife Clementine bought the property, located two miles south of Westerham, Kent, England, in 1922. (Note: the menorah in the garden is not really there.)

Once again Churchill displayed “Milner’s observation” during the Munich Crisis, where he saw an opportunity to go to war with Adolf Hitler. He gave little thought to the state of training and the geographic location of the British Regular Army, and his only plan was to bring France and the dominions into the war to fight the land battles and eventually bring the United States into war with Germany. Both Chamberlain and Sir Leslie Hore-Belisha knew the true state of readiness of Britain’s armed forces, which were in no condition to fight.

But more important, Churchill gave little thought to the fact that Poland had been at war with Czechoslovakia for some 10 years over the Teschen province. He overlooked the fact that if Russia were to come to the aid of Czechoslovakia, it would have to invade either Poland or Romania, or both, and that Britain had treaties with both countries if they were attacked. The result of which would be that Britain and Germany would be fighting Russia, and Churchill did not consider the possible actions of the new Axis partner, Japan. Nor did he see that, apart from a strong desire for peace, most countries saw Hitler as a bulwark against Stalin.

Germany ended up being surrounded by a mob of squabbling, unstable states with each containing large masses of Germans.

But still Churchill condemned Chamberlain for not going to war with Hitler over the Sudetenland. Only after the destruction of Germany did he realize the real threat when he commented to Gen. Hastings Lionel “Pug” Ismay (first baron Ismay):

“We’ve killed the wrong pig!”

But somehow Winnie would get his war and satisfy his benefactors.

Both the media and Churchill chose to misrepresent Chamberlain’s actions at Munich. But by the end of September 1938, the Poles had invaded Teschen, as the Germans marched into Sudetenland, which was some 90% German ethnically and a product of Woodrow Wilson. The rest of Czechoslovakia was dissected by her neighbors, including Hungary. Alfred Duff-Cooper, a staunch Zionist and member of Focus, resigned as first lord of the Admiralty in protest for Chamberlain not having gone to war with Germany (and possibly Poland), over Sudetenland.

[Image] Churchill and Duff Cooper

Churchill looks over the shoulder of Alfred Duff Cooper, the Minister of Information. Cooper, Churchill’s friend and political ally, was brought back into the Cabinet after his very public resignation as First Lord of the Admiralty in protest at Chamberlain’s policy on Czechoslovakia. He later became the liaison with the Free French forces and was Ambassador to France following the liberation in 1944.

By the end of March 1939, Czech troops marched into Bratislava, Slovakia and deposed the president, Father Jozef Tiso, while Slovakia and Ruthenia declared their independence from the state created by the League of Nations and about which David Lloyd George was to say:

“I cannot conceive any greater cause of a future war than that the German people should be surrounded by a mob of small states, many of them consisting of peoples who have never previously set up stable governments by themselves, but each of them containing large masses of Germans.”

Through fear of civil war, President of the Second Czechoslovakian Republic Dr. Emil Hacha signed an agreement (March 15, 1939) making a German Protectorate of Moravia and Bohemia. Hungarian troops crossed the Ruthenian border, driving out the Czech units. This mess was played down by the British media as well as Germany’s offer of Slovakia to Poland, for the Port of Danzig.

The news that the people of Britain, the dominions and in fact all the world heard was that Hitler had occupied all of Czechoslovakia.

Though all members of the League of Nations agreed that the Polish Corridor rightly belonged to Germany, Churchill would organize a mutiny within Neville Chamberlain’s caucus to demand that Britain go to war over Poland, even though Austen Chamberlain, the British foreign secretary, had said that the Polish corridor was not worth one British corporal. But Churchill and Focus saw it as a chance to destroy Hitler. Polish independence was the last thing on their minds, especially after Poland had invaded Czechoslovakia, for which Churchill demanded war.

The last thing the people of Britain and France wanted was another bloodbath over some distant and unknown land. But through Focus and Churchill, both Britain and France and later the world, would be dragged into a war nobody wanted and that would solve nothing.

[Image] Newspaper headlines when Britain and soon to follow, France, declare war on Germany.

On Sept. 3, 1939, Britain declared war on Germany, and Churchill was made first lord of the Admiralty. He arranged to have a signal flashed to all ships in the Royal Navy, “Winston is Back.” But there was no joy throughout the fleet at Churchill’s appointment. Churchill behaved as though he had been made “secretary of state for war” and began issuing orders to the other armed services. His first act as first lord was to issue orders to the Royal Air Force to attack the German naval bases at Wilhemshaven and Brunsbuttel.

Here is the record; 29 Blenheims and Wellingtons attacked; 10 bombers failed to find their targets and returned to base; one plane bombed Esbjerg, a town in Denmark some 110 miles from their target, three planes attacked their own “men-of-war” in the North Sea; seven were shot down by German flak; eight bombers found their targets and attacked the battleship Von Scheer with three unprimed bombs, doing no damage. They scored several hits on the cruiser Emden, the only real damage being done when a plane crashed on the ship. The marksmanship of the RAF improved very little over the next two years.

———————————-

MAJ. MERVYN F. THURGOOD is the author of To Punish the Hostiles and the editor of A Symposium on World War II. He is also author of a much longer version of this article entitled That Bastard Churchill, Born in 1923 in British Columbia, Thurgood served with the Seaforth Highlanders Canadian infantry regiment.

Winnie the War Criminal:

A Synopsis of Atrocities Ordered by Mr. Churchill

Winston Churchill planned and committed war crimes, trashing the rules of “civilized” warfare that had been developed over the centuries in the Western world.

At the Second Quebec Conference (September 16, 1944), Churchill and fellow monster Franklin D. Roosevelt adopted the sinister Morgenthau Plan, which would have killed tens of millions of Germans, giving the Germans a terrifying picture of what “unconditional surrender” would mean in practice. Germans would be robbed of East Prussia, Upper Silesia and all of western Germany, and the remainder would be split into separate northern and southern nations.

Churchill was convinced the plan would;

“save Britain from bankruptcy by eliminating a dangerous competitor.”

Estimating that millions would die immediately by inhalation, and millions more would succumb later, Churchill contemplated dropping tens of thousands of anthrax bombs on the civilian population and ordered detailed planning for a chemical attack on six major German cities.

His greatest war crimes involved the carpet-bombing of German cities that killed 600,000 civilians and left some 800,000 injured. [Note: approximately 40,000 British were killed during The Blitz] Churchill lied to the House of Commons and the public, claiming only military and industrial installations were targeted, whereas the real aim was to kill as many civilians as possible.

A thousand-year-old urban culture was annihilated, as great cities, famed in the annals of science and art, were reduced to smoldering ruins. Churchill and Roosevelt were destroying more than Attila the Hun.

Dresden was filled with refugees running for their lives from the Red Army. The war was practically over. But for three days and nights, from February 13 to 15, 1945, British bombs rained down on the defenseless city, killing 135,000 people or more.

The bombing of Germany and killing of civilians continued as late as the middle of April 1945, only stopping because there were no more targets left to be bombed.

— JOHN TIFFANY

———————————-

Footnotes

[1] Here is a less “heroic” account of Churchill’s “escape” from the Boers  taken from pages 44 – 46 of Hidden History — The Secret Origins of the First World War by Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor:

Winston Churchill had been sent to South Africa as a war correspondent for the conservative Morning Post in 1899 and ended up in a Boer prisoner-of-war camp. The story, and it was largely his, derives from Churchill’s autobiography. [57] According to his own account, he joined a reconnaissance mission aboard an armoured train on 15 November 1899 and was captured along with around 60 British officers and men when the Boers attacked it. Taken to Pretoria, they were held in an old school surrounded by a ten-foot-high corrugated-iron wall. Churchill gave an account of the derailment and his subsequent action in making a ‘daring escape‘ to other journalists. The Daily Telegraph printed a dispatch from Reuters headlined ‘Mr Churchill’s bravery and coolness is described as magnificent‘. The hero created himself.

What went unreported was that following his internment Churchill wanted himself classified as a non-combatant on the grounds that he was a journalist. He used his connections to send a begging letter to Alfred Milner on 24 November asking that he be included in a list of prisoners to be released and said that he had asked his mother to write to him through Milner. [58] He also submitted requests for his release on 26 November and 8 December, [59] and promised that ‘if I am released I will give any parole that I may be required not to serve against the Republican forces‘. [60] On 12 December, the Boer commander-in-chief agreed to release him, and some time thereafter Churchill was never seen again in the camp.

On his subsequent arrival in the Portuguese port of Lourenco Marques Churchill relayed an amazing adventure. He claimed to have cut through the fencing under the noses of the Boer guards and made a tortuous journey to freedom. His ‘daring escape‘ became the stuff of legend. On his own and unable to speak either Afrikaans or Kaffir, but bolstered by the surprisingly large sum of £75 (worth over £6,000 in today’s currency), he made the 250-mile journey to the safe haven of Lourenco Marques. His odyssey was worthy of any Greek hero of ancient myth. Crossing dangerous terrain and dodging the heavily armed Boer commandos who were out hunting for him, he eventually came to a railway track and leapt onto a train as it thundered past. This must have been accomplished with considerable difficulty, ‘partly because of his dislocated shoulder‘. [61]

In another fawning account, Churchill is said to have ‘hurled himself upon a truck, and after an agonising struggle managed to remain crouching on the couplings between two wagons‘. [62] Within a very short time, however, thirst forced him to leap off in search of water. Crawling on his belly, he dragged himself through swamps before coming across the Boer township of Witbank. He was unbelievably fortunate to knock on the door of ‘the only family for twenty miles where he would not have been handed over‘. [63] After three days in hiding, allegedly in the company of rats down a mineshaft, he got aboard another railway truck and concealed himself under bales of wool. It was the train to Delagoa Bay, freedom and ‘a blaze of triumph‘. [64] That is how Churchill told his story.

Controversy hung around his account like the rats in his mineshaft. There were accusations that he had behaved selfishly and badly by leaving on his own and creating such self-seeking publicity. Fortune and determined legal proceedings, however, seem to have removed such reservations. British officers in the camp, Captain Haldane, Sergeant Brockie, and Lieutenants le Mesurier and Frankland felt he had ruined their chances of freedom. Haldane’s claims were strengthened by his refusal to appear in court on Churchill’s behalf in a libel case against Blackwood’s Magazine in 1912. Despite these contrary voices, his ‘daring escape‘ turned Churchill into a public hero and gifted him a Conservative seat for Oldham in the parliamentary elections just a few months later.

___________________________

PDF Version History & Notes

Version 4: Jul 19, 2015 — Added footnote on Churchill’s “escape” from the Boers.

Version 3: Jul 18, 2015 — cartoon image updated

Version 2: Jul 18, 2015 — 2 images updated

Version 1: Published Jul 18, 2015

__________________

Notes

* Images not in the original document.

* Footnotes are not in the original document.

* Cover image is not part of the original document.

__________________

Knowledge is Power in Our Struggle for Racial Survival

(Information that should be shared with as many of our people as possible — do your part to counter Jewish control of the mainstream media — pass it on and spread the word) … Val Koinen at 

KOINEN’S CORNER

======================================

[NOTE: Louis Marschalko was a Christian and as such his book reflects that. The purpose of posting his work is not to endorse his religious views but rather to present his study on the jews and their supremacist agenda of world conquest – KATANA]

The World

Conquerors

The Real War Criminals

by

Louis Marschalko

Part 19 (last)

Amazon Reviews

amazon.com

http://www.amazon.com/The-World-Conquerors-Louis-Marschalko/

9 of 14 people found the following review helpful

5 What a tremendous aid in understanding world events today.

By timothy k. price on December 25, 2013

This is a book that has to be read. Some people will protest and call it “anti-simetic” but this is not true.

A large tribe of people will deluge this site with protests against the book. Pay no attention to them. Read this book.

Showing 1 of 1 comments

Latimer the Cat 1 year ago

“What a tremendous aid in understanding world events today.”

Of course. Like it or not, today is a reflection of yesterday. Isn’t that why revisionist (real) history publishing was banned under the post 1917 judaic/communist incursion of Russia? Isn’t that why the other side of the coin (the NSDAP view) of what’s taught as WWII is never taught here in America even after 70+ years after the conflict?

8 of 12 people found the following review helpful

5 Must read

By john bebekon March 2, 2013

One of the most informative books I have read.If you want a unsanatised version of events, then this is the book.

Louis Marschalko tell’s it like it happened,and is still happening today.

11 of 14 people found the following review helpful

5 Truth Before It’s Time

By john thames “scholar1” on February 25, 2013

Long before the Holocaust denying Institute for Historical Review appeared on the scene, Louis Marschalko, a Hungarian, wrote a definitive expose of the six million myth in the context of a book exposing world-wide Jewish conspiracy. Remember, the book was published in English in the late 1950’s and got everything right long before its time. Although there are a few mangled quotations and slight errors of fact, Marschalko saw through the fog of propganda long before organized revisionism appeared on the scene. It is a remarkable book – and one still worth reading if you can find it.

19 of 23 people found the following review helpful

5 The Clearness of Marschalko.

By Paul Wasa on May 12, 2010

Mr. Marschalko does a good job in exposing the poisoning mind of the Jews worldwide.

He’s very well documented and has a very clear insight on things gone by. He analyzes the 2nd World War regarding the Jews and draws the most logical conclusions.

A book not only worth of being read, but I should say “a must” for younger people, who know nothing about WWII but from Jewish books and Jewish propaganda films, most of them untrue or biassed.

Paul Wasa.

Honest Critic 4 months ago

agreed… good read… goes hand in hand with a Greater Miracle of the Lost Ten Tribes Discovered and Fearless and Godly Pioneers for the Truth (which also gives a short bio. on Marshalko)… read it before you dismiss it.

31 of 34 people found the following review helpful

4 Controversial, but interesting

By S. Swink on August 27, 2007

Louis Marschalko — a Hungarian nationalist – published this book book in 1958. “The World Conquerors,” surveys the worldwide advance of communism from a decidedly Catholic perspective. The author’s argument is that communism is a worldwide movement, promoted everywhere by the same worldwide, transnational force.

In four chapters relating to WWII, “The Real Victors of the Second World War”, “Revenge is Ours”, “New Purim and Nuremberg”, and “What Has Become of Six Million Jews?”, Marschalko proves himself a one-man Institute for Historical Review.

Good Morning from the Zundelsite

Copyright (c) 1997 – Ingrid A. Rimland

September 23, 1997

In a book review published with permission from Granata Communications, below I give you yet another excellent summary of a classic:

Louis Marschalko’s book, “The World Conquerors,” first published in 1958, is more timely now than ever. It is one of those volumes whose prophesies lies in fulfillment.

Written by a Hungarian nationalist, it surveys the worldwide advance of communism as the unfolding of the scheme of the notorious “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”.

The book’s thesis is expounded in its first chapter. Entitled “The Oldest Nazism in the World”, Marschalko shows the bolshevism of the Old Testament. The Fuehrership of Moses laid the foundation for all that has come since.

Although not a study of organized religion, the author’s side comments show astounding clarity. The Catholic perspective of Mr. Marschalko underlies his opposition to “The World Conquerors” he exposes: Christianity as the antithesis of Judaism, Protestantism as a reversion to the barbarism of the Old Testament, the ancient worship of the Golden Calf as the basis for emerging capitalism.

The rest of the book piles fact upon fact to make its case. The Jewish background of communism is thoroughly explored. Much of the material is familiar. However, a very valuable survey of communism in South America is included. This reinforces the author’s argument that communism is a worldwide movement, promoted everywhere by the same worldwide, transnational force.

Moving on, Marschalko examines the real nature of the German National Socialist regime. Its achievements are noted, as well as the real reasons for the war. Hitler’s Germany had to be destroyed if the program of the “Protocols” were to be fulfilled.

The author provides much information on the persecution of the Germans in Poland at the time when such claims were almost universally dismissed as propaganda.

The section on World War II and its aftermath is astounding Revisionism ahead of its time. In four chapters, “The Real Victors of the Second World War”, “Revenge is Ours”, “New Purim and Nuremberg”, and “What Has Become of Six Million Jews?”, Marschalko proves himself a one-man Institute for Historical Review.

The Jewish staffing and orchestration of the Nuremberg Trial, the east-west collaboration in the hounding of “war criminals”, the real fate of the fabled Six Million, the setting up of Jewish persecution as the moral standard of the post war era, all are devastatingly analyzed to show the vested interests at work.

Even the well-informed reader will be amazed at the cohesion and extent of the Jewish revenge which was taken post-1945 in Europe. Each of these chapters can and should be expanded into full length books. Until that happens, these four chapters may be taken as a primer on the subject.

The rest of the book covers the post war era of the Cold War up to the date of publication, 1958. The Jewish involvement in the atomic bomb treason, the Hungarian uprising of 1956 and the efforts of the Jewish media to cover up anti-communist exposures by Senator Joseph McCarthy and others confirm the blackout on truth by “The World Conquerors”.

Particularly valuable is the voluminous evidence presented on the post-war Jewish control of the Soviet Union. Marschalko convincingly argues that the deportation of Western Russia’s Jews ahead of the Nazi invasion created a second Iron Curtain. The Jews were concentrated in the Soviet arms production factories behind the Ural Mountains. This allowed them to retain a key grip on power while denuding the western provinces where Jews were never popular.

The United Nations is also exposed as a front for Jews. A voluminous list of Jews in key positions is appended. In reviewing the evidence, it is difficult to conclude anything other than that the shoe fits.

If there is no Jewish conspiracy at work, the world has been treated to amazing coincidence. A better explanation is that Louis Marschalko is right. His presentation is logically lucid and well documented. It is also easily read and easily understood. A short book of only 296 pages, it is hardly all-inclusive. But as a statement of the essential facts, it has stood the test of time. It summarizes the facts and points the student in the proper direction for further research.

(Copyright 1958, reprinted 1983. Translated from the Hungarian by A. Suranyi. No Library of Congress #. No ISBN.)

Thought for the Day:

“There are persons, too, who see not the full extent of the evil which threatens them; they solace themselves with hopes that the enemy, if he succeed, will be merciful.”

“It is the madness of folly, to expect mercy from those who have refused to do justice; and even mercy, where conquest is the object, is only a trick of war; the cunning of the fox is as murderous as the violence of the wolf, and we ought to guard equally against both.”

(Thomas Paine)

The World

Conquerors

The Real War Criminals

by

Louis Marschalko

1958

English translation by A. Suranyi

Publisher: Britons Publishing Society, London

CONTENTS

CHAPTER

Introduction

1. The oldest “Nazism” in the World

2. The Meaning of Christ’s Resistance

3. World Domination in Three Stages

4. Millionaire Bankers Back Bolshevism

5. A Movement Maligned

6. The Real War Criminals

7. Why Hitler Had to Go

8. The Real Victors of the Second World War

9. “Revenge is Ours”.

10. New Purim and Nuremberg

11. What Has Become of Six Million Jews?

12. Spiritual and Economic Persecution

13. Biological Class-warfare Against All Nations

14. The Jews Have the Atom Bomb

15. The Betrayal of America

16. The Fulfilment of the Protocols and the Farewell Letter of a Hungarian Martyr

17. The Key Positions of Jewish World-Power

18. Secret Powers

19. The Hungarian Freedom Revolt

Epilogue

Dedication

To the memory of the Nationalist Martyrs

and victims of Bolshevism

About the Author

Louis Marschalkó

http: //en.metapedia.org/wiki/LouisMarschalko

Louis Marschalko (September 11, 1903 — May 20, 1968) was a Hungarian nationalist writer and author of The World Conquerors (1958).

His father was a secondary school teacher, his mother a musician.

He started to work for nationalistic newspapers. He lived in Debrecen until 1936, when he moved to Budapest. He wrote the booklet Who Betrayed Hungary in 1918-19. The booklet was banned after 1945, as anti-judaic and anti-semitic, even though the author had no influence to the fact that over 90% of the betrayers and Bolsheviks were Jews. He opened the eyes of the Hungarian readers with that book, since only few knew, that most the betrayers were Jews. Jews in Europe generally hide their Jewishness in the public.

He did not come home 1945, but had to remain in Munich, since otherwise the Bolshevists for sure had killed him. He wanted to emigrate to the USA, but having spent some months on Ellis Island in New York, the American immigration authorities refused his immigration application due to Jewish influences. He returned to Munich and worked as a simple worker, and wrote his books and articles at night.

Since Jews (Martin Himler and others) who betrayed Hungary and caused lot of suffering in Hungary, appeared after the Second World War in Europe as American officers in CIC uniforms, and gathered East-European patriots and delivered them to sure death under the Bolshevistic regime of their race-companions, wrote some scandalous smear books about Hungary and Hungarians, he wrote about the role of Jews in Hungary and in the world. (Conquestors of the Country, Conquestors of the World). He was also co-author of the book “Accusing Gallows” that described the tragic destiny of the last legal Hungarian administration. His book “Conquestors of the World” was published three times in the USA, but he did not receive any royalties.

He died in Munich, 1968. On his grave there are the words:

“For God, our country and freedom, forever”.

[Inside dustcover]

The Second World War was said to have been waged for “the rights of small nations,” but the author, like countless other Hungarians, is literally “on the run from Communism.” He has been living in exile since 1945 because of his anti-communist views, Although he was never a member of any party, the Communist regime of Hungary, with typical effrontery, demanded that the U.S.A. authorities “hand Louis Marschalko over as a war criminal.” A former special correspondent of two leading newspapers in pre-Communist Hungary, Marshalko is a brilliant novelist, playwright and poet and has many hundreds of articles to his credit. World Conquerors expresses some of the bitterness and contempt of millions of enslaved Europeans for the rulers of the “victorious nations.” It shows that by being urged to throw off the German yoke, the central European nations were tricked into becoming satellites of the Soviet.

World Conquerors indicts the real war criminals. It gives horrifying glimpses of the agony behind the Iron Curtain and describes the plot to extend the slave system to the Western world. Thousands of copies of the Hungarian edition have been sold and this English translation is published to warn the West. It is written by one who is a firm friend of the English-speaking people but an implacable foe of their vacillating and corrupt governments.

Chapter Nineteen

The Hungarian Freedom Revolt

In October, 1956, fighting broke out in Hungary for national freedom. An entire nation rose up — not only against the East, but simultaneously against the West as well. The Hungarian freedom fighters, who with undaunted gallantry turned against the secret police of the A.V.H., run by the Jews, with equal heroism refused to accept the corrupt chequebook régime of Western Capitalism.

Though a free Hungary could not be born yet, a new world was envisaged in the hearts of men. The several-thousand-year-old concept of Socialism took shape and materialised once more in the heart and imagination of the masses — a concept which could also be regarded as being part of a new exemplary world containing the most modern social order. The exploited slave of the mines and factories of Soviet State Capitalism, the pupil of the Marxist-Leninist Institute, the officer of working class origin in the People’s Army and the small peasant, all rose unanimously against Bolshevism, the most developed form of Jewish world domination.

The freedom fighters appear to have avoided raising the problem of Jewish dominion. The leaders and terrorists of the secret police (A.V.H.) were exterminated, not as Jews but as common murderers and as anti-social elements guilty of crimes against the people and humanity. Nevertheless, in its essential features, this freedom fighting constituted the first real revolution against the world conquerors, for the leaders of the Bolshevik terror regime in Hungary, occupying key positions in the terror organisations of the police and of the army, were almost exclusively Jews. The character of the terror itself was predominantly Jewish and only Slav-Bolshevistic to a small degree.

[Page 285]

“It is from us that the all-engulfing terror proceeds,” say the Protocols.

And everything prophesied and envisaged in the Protocols concerning the Jewish secret police was here materialised and highly developed. The State Security Department, which was solely controlled by Jews, had everybody in Hungary registered in its police files on the card index system. These so-called “cadre cards” gave details about each member of the population. In them each person’s character, peculiarities, etc., were recorded with meticulous care, including even occasional expressions of his or her views or ideas. It was known that the worst possible entry on anybody’s card was to be recorded as an “anti-Semite”. We know of the case of a young clerk who was stamped “anti-Semite” just because she was not keen on seeking the friendship of her colleagues, who thus “sensed” that she was perhaps not fond of Jews.

The State Security Authorities (A.V.H.) employed a staff of 40,000 to keep these secret records, compiled by 400,000 spies out of items passed on from factories, works, offices and every walk of life. Everyone summoned to the State Security Department was treated with the utmost cruelty and ruthlessness.

In 1945-46, the Fraternal Society of Jewish Labour Companies organised the Communist terror police in Budapest. This organisation was headed by Dr. Zoltan Klar, the former notorious Jewish millionaire doctor in Budapest, who is now active in America as an “editor”. The various groups of this society regularly visited the prisons and other places of detention where they raped the women prisoners several times daily. They invented such bestial methods for torturing people that their equal cannot be found even among the methods of Chinese torturers. Prisoners with long-term sentences were obliged to stage quarrels ending in bloody fights during their daily walk in the prison yard. It is of interest to note that the present Premier, János Kádár, was also tortured when for a short time he dared to defy the Muscovite system. All his fingernails were plucked out and, according to reports that appeared in several Swiss newspapers, he was castrated.

Thousands of similar cases were reported by the freedom fighters and by those released from the Communist prisons who came to the West. When the freedom fighters succeeded in occupying the buildings of the secret police, they found further proofs of a terror almost incredible to the Western world. Huge halls and large rooms were stuffed with the most unimportant telephone conversations recorded on tape and filed.

[Page 286]

Unimportant letters from abroad had been photographed on microfilms and filed away in a gigantic card index system. On Tisza Kálmán Square in Budapest, a secret prison with 3,000 cells had been built and equipped on the site of a half-finished underground railway station, the existence of which was unknown until the freedom fights started. Similar underground prisons were also detected in provincial centres together with subterranean passages to enable Communist “leaders” to escape in an emergency.

And so, if we take into consideration that in Hungary the leaders were Jews, it can truthfully be said that here the most extreme dream of Jewry’s world kingdom materialised.

This Jewish world kingdom had other means at its disposal besides terror. As well as biological class warfare which physically destroyed the most gifted personalities in Hungarian social life, there was also political class warfare. Anybody, whose grandfather had been a smallholder, the owner of twenty to twenty-five acres of land, or whose father had been a minor civil servant before 1945, was declared to be “class-alien”. Such a man might possess the highest qualifications as a doctor, university professor, lawyer or scientist, nevertheless all these were useless once he was declared “class-alien”, upon which the only employment open to him was in the capacity of an unskilled labourer. Positions thus rendered vacant were partly filled by ignorant and uneducated Communists and also, in greater part, by those Jews who occupied key positions in the régime. At the same time 50,000 intellectuals were deported to the provinces, where they existed in most miserable conditions. In 1953, there were about 95,000 political prisoners put to slave labour in the internment camps, while about 25,000 were in the various prisons. Furthermore, according to the records of the Communist régime, 15,000 “official” executions took place between 1945 and 1956. This latter figure came to light when the freedom fighters liberated the Central Prison on November 1st, 1956.

These are startling figures. In the whole of Czarist Russia there were only 40,000 exiles, and in Hungary between 1867 and 1939 the total number of persons killed during strikes, riots and disturbances, in consequence of the lawful use of force by the armed services, only amounted to seventeen.

[Page 287]

Clearly the object of these atrocities was to reduce the Hungarian people to an intimidated mass of slaves in accordance with the formula of the Protocols, and so to establish Jewry’s dominion over them. Against the dominion of this Jewish world kingdom the Hungarian nation rose on October 23rd, 1956, because in spite of everything it had not proved possible to break and reduce this people into an anthropomorphous, unthinking mass.

On the blood-soaked pavements of the capital city of Budapest both aspects of the world conquerors were attacked at the same time. The Hungarian proletariat together with university students, arms in hand, desperately fought against the third stage of Jewish conquest — against the terror campaign with its organisation of suppression. But the Hungarian people were equally opposed to the second stage, which consisted in the reintroduction of Liberal Capitalism.

Their unwritten programme was: Socialism without terror! National freedom without economic subordination!

It is quite evident that this programme could not be tolerated by the East any more than by the West. The Hungarian fight for freedom was of a nationalistic character. It was consequently as much opposed to Moscow as it was to the alternative terror and the slave system of U.N.O.

The reality of the world’s division into two hemispheres was well demonstrated when the Hungarian people tried to break out of the Eastern Hemisphere, and when the Arab world, led by the Egyptian nationalists, tried to break out of the Western Hemisphere. It appeared quite natural that Kaganovich, once more in the limelight, should start rolling Zhukov’s armoured divisions into Hungary. But on the other hand, it did not appear to be quite as natural for Israel, in alliance with Britain and France, to attack Egypt so suddenly.

Almost on the same day, events proved that the existence of the two hemispheres was a sober fact. And of course, the Yalta and Potsdam agreements were also in force, together with the Gomberg Plan. The demarcation lines laid down in these agreements cannot be transgressed either by Hungary or by Egypt. Otherwise, the armoured divisions of Ben Gurion and of Kaganovich will come and obliterate every form of nationalism with its longing for freedom and independence.

The Hungarian freedom uprising started on October 23rd and the Israeli forces crossed the frontiers of Egypt on October 29th. It was reported on this same day by the radios of the Hungarian freedom fighters that strong Soviet units had begun to invade Hungary from the East.

[Page 288]

The Western world grossly betrayed Hungary and Egypt. New York Jewry held a special gathering in the early days of the Hungarian Rebellion and promptly stamped the Hungarian war of independence as an “anti-Semitic” movement, so U.N.O. quickly decided not to help the freedom fighters but to give a free hand to the armoured divisions of the Soviet. Meanwhile, Britain and France, in alliance with Ben Gurion, made haste to bomb the “anti-Semites” of Port Said.

But the treason of the Western world was more insidious and fatal than the open brutality of the Soviets. The Western world betrayed its own interests as well as its own much advertised principles, not to mention democracy and humanity, when it became more and more certain that behind the bombastic phrases uttered during the Suez crisis there lurked an alien interest, namely, the interest of Jewish world nationalism. Needless to say, nobody dragged Ben Gurion before the Court of Nuremberg “for planning an aggressive war”, for which Generals Jodl and Keitl were executed. Meanwhile, the United Nations, with its 1,200 Jews out of a total of 1,800 personnel, looked on without a murmur while the Soviet committed acts of the most horrible genocide under their very eyes.

But all this was natural and according to plan, since the complete and perfect Jewish world kingdom was restored in Hungary, even without Mátyás Rákosi-Roth.

It pleases a certain section of the Press in the Western world to spread the rumour that the Hungarian Communist “government” formed after the suppression of the uprising is actually “anti-Semitic”. Let us examine what lies behind the headlines. Here can be seen an excellent example of the working of the “Gentile front”. Here, the puppet, János Kádár, whose real name is Csernák, is in fact of Slav rather than of Jewish origin.

[Page 289]

But the two deputy Prime Ministers, Antal Apró-Apfelbaum and Ferenc Munnich — are both Jews. The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Imre Horváth, together with his two deputy Foreign Ministers, Endre Silk and István Sebes are Jews. Moreover, Géza Révész, Minister of Defence; István Antos, Minister of Finance; Ferenc Nezvál, Minister of Justice; Sebestyén Bakonyi, First Deputy-Minister of Foreign Trade; János Tausz, Minister of Home Trade; Gyula Kállai (Campescu), Minister of Education, and his deputy-minister, György Aczél, chief organiser of the Anti-Religious Campaign and of the persecution of the Churches, are all Jews.

The world conquerors swarm in the Central Committee of the Hungarian Communist Party, an authority which is more important than the Government itself. The Jewish members of the Central Committee are at present (1958) : Antal Apró-Apfelbaum, György Aczél, Janö Fock, László Földes, Istvan Friss, Imre Horváth, Gyula Kállai (Campescu), Károly Kis, Ferenc Münnich, Dezsö Nemes, chairman of the Editorial Committee of the Hungarian Communist daily of Népzabadság, Ferenc Nezvál, Sándor Nógrádi, László Orbán and Kálmán Révai.

The ill-famed secret police (A.V.H.), with its organisation of terror, torture and murder, was set up again, and as before, its leaders almost exclusively consisted of members of the Jewish fraternity.

We do not feel guilty of prejudice in stating that the Hungarian fight for freedom in 1956 was of considerable historical importance. It proved that every form of Marxism had completely failed to win over the workers and genuine Socialists, despite the fact that in the promotion of the Jewish world kingdom values had been levelled downwards for more than a century. World power exercised from key positions also failed, since both workers and proletariat joined forces instinctively with the intellectual sections and their first action was to liquidate these key positions. It became evident in Hungary that the workers as well as the rest of the nation no longer desired the so-called Western Capitalist system. They refused to accept either the Eastern or Western form of exploitation. The Hungarian nation desires the means of production to remain in its own hands, and this not in the form of national Communism but on the basis of a new national and socialist system free of totalitarianism. This concept ought to give food for thought to the Western Capitalist world and to the Western workers as well. Humanity can be saved from the horrors of atomic warfare and atomic death only by the Western world showing to the workers of the East that same form of socialism which was born during the Hungarian freedom fighting of 1956, the charter of which has yet to be written. Such socialism could take the tommy-gun away from the terror groups, smash the Golden Calf and liquidate the power of Jewish International Finance.

[Page 290]

Only a socialistic society that has been purged of its hatreds can save mankind. Until the world is free of the hatred with which it has been infected by Jewish mentality for the last 2,000 years, the danger of atomic death or endless servitude will be ever with us.

The first step to take should be the abolition of all childish forms of “anti-Semitism”. It must be made plain that we are not “anti-Semites”. We condemn “anti-Semitism” first of all on a racial basis, for the real Semites, the Arab nations, are our brothers and natural allies of all nationalist forces in the global struggle.

Neither are we “anti-Semites” in the Hitlerian meaning of the word, i.e., on racial grounds, because we neither teach nor accept the superiority of any race.

We are not “anti-Semites” in the religious sense of the word either, for we are liberal-minded enough to respect one religion as much as the other.

And finally we are not “anti-Semitic” at all in the sense of hating any Jewish personal characteristic. We do not mind either the shape of his nose or his social mannerisms.

What we hate is Jewish world power with its 2,000 years of “Nazi” scheming and plotting to drive the whole of mankind into servitude, atomic death and exploitation. Therefore we must not attack the personal, racial or national characteristics of the Jews, but on the other hand, whether as democrats, socialists or national socialists, we should carry out our duty as human beings in resisting by all lawful means — and even, if necessary, by revolution — the survival of any form of Jewish world domination. We have every right to stand up against an illegal power to remove those in key positions behind the Gentile front.

Wherever this domination is exerted its identity must be mercilessly exposed. For this and other reasons an international — or better still — a supranational anti-Jewish world organisation should be established.

[Page 291]

This organisation would define the tactics to be employed according to the characteristics of the various countries. It should not attempt to prescribe to the various nations the form of government to be adopted, or to advise them on policy. Perhaps the best weapons in America would prove to be the democratic ones of the vote, backed by a policy of general enlightenment together with social and financial boycott if necessary. In the so-called Fascist countries it would be necessary to win over the central power, and in the socialist countries to convince the honest and sincere socialists. Behind the Iron Curtain it would entail fighting guerilla and partisan campaigns against the Jewish leaders of the régime. Here the tommy-gun is a lawful weapon in the struggle which those heroes of the Hungarian freedom fighters waged with such exemplary resolution. Terror is the reply to terrorism, but it must be used against terrorists only.

Law and order does not mean the suppression of freedom. The only “freedom” to be abolished is that spurious kind of toleration which enables the exponents of tribal “Nazism” to do anything they please. When all the “liberties”, so far restricted to the “chosen people”, permitting them to spread terror, exploitation and unlimited profiteering, are abolished, then Jewry, bereft of its privileges and monopolies, will be faced with the great question of its own fate.

How long can the present trend of events continue? For how much longer must the nations be dragged from one deception to another? How long can Bolshevism be maintained, and when will America at last awake? Are the nations to continue in servitude — suppressed and cheated — and from time to time subjected to wage bloody wars which are planned by an alien nationalism?

Although this world conquest has been continuing with growing impetus during the last 2,000 years, it has always relied on the bayonets of other nations.

“The Western Jew will equip an army of twenty million in the East…” presaged the Hungarian prophet. But the greatest and mightiest forces of world Jewry, the Soviet Red Armies, were shaken by the sacrifices of the Hungarian proletariats. In the northern provincial city of Miskolc in Hungary, the officers of the Russian armoured divisions ordered to advance against the university students, committed suicide in the street by putting bullets into their own heads rather than carry out their murderous tasks. The Russian soldiers frequently gave themselves up, saying they would not shoot at their Hungarian brothers. During the most critical moments of the uprising at Budapest it often happened that entire Russian armoured units went over to the side of the freedom fighters and together with them fired on the terrorists.

[Page 292]

It is reliably reported that a great Russian armoured division unit with 400 tanks sent envoys to the Hungarian freedom fighters saying that it was prepared to turn its T-54 guns against their oppressors provided the Hungarians refused to negotiate with the Western Capitalists. (An agreement was concluded, but it was too late. On November 4th, 1956, the Russian divisions were ordered to attack, and for the time being military discipline proved stronger than the individual sentiments of the soldiers.)

The confidence and faith of world Jewry’s greatest army was shaken. So also was the confidence of the soldiers of other suppressed nations who openly took the part of the Hungarian people. The Rumanian Army could not be sent to Hungary because the Rumanian Jewish leaders warned Moscow that its units would go over to the side of the Hungarians.

“When the hour strikes,” said a high-ranking Russian officer to the leaders of the Hungarian freedom fighters;

“we also will turn our weapons against our Jewish oppressors, as you did. Your mistake was only that you acted prematurely!”

The powers behind the scenes cannot rely on the Russian soldier any longer.

But can they rely on the American soldier? Despite the fact that American political life is to a great extent still geared to the Morgenthau outlook, nevertheless, the U.S. Army has learned a great deal since 1945. It saw the crushed body of General Patton, the sufferings of the German people, it was profusely bled in Korea and it witnessed how world Jewry removed General MacArthur, the victorious American military leader.

The Hungarian rising of 1956 was not the end but the beginning. And for the world conquerors this beginning posed the great question — how long can we go on?

Is it possible to continue being conquerors forever? Is it possible forever to go about in armoured cars like Rabinovich, Rákosi-Roth and their sort, guarded for the time being by Mongolian, Hungarian or Rumanian body-guards? Can we be certain that the Mongolians will not rebel one day? Can we sail in luxury yachts off Florida and sit on top of civilisation without being a prey to unceasing fears that at any moment our power may collapse? How much longer can the world be mesmerised into believing that everybody who sees through our designs is just a hate-mongering “anti-Semite”? And how much longer must fires of burning hatred be kept alive between the nations in order to repeat the horrors of another Auschwitz in America?

[Page 293]

For how much longer can we send the elite of the nations to the gallows and yet cry “anti-Semitism” when they rise up against our nationalism? How long can internationalism be preached by us to the nations while we ourselves practise the most extreme racial and tribal nationalism? How long can we maintain the fiction that if any harm comes to us that is “anti-Semitism”, but when we kill anybody or slaughter entire nations, that is the act of either American democracy or Soviet liberation? When we destroy, that is construction; when we murder, that is freedom; when we terrorise the whole world, that is democracy; but when one member of the holy seed of Abraham is lost then it is the duty of the whole world to mourn with us! If we exploit other peoples as befits our selfish principles, that is not nationalism, but if other people want to live their own independent life — that is barbarism!

How long will all this continue? When is the world going to wake up? How long will a state of double morality be tolerated, according to which a Jew is free to commit almost any crime against other people? When will the world hit upon the truth that behind the wars, revolutions and slumps it is our plans that prosper? The coil of the symbolic serpent has encircled the entire globe and also the life, mentality and morale of the nations. It has levelled the masses downwards and destroyed individuality in order to enslave the people. When, then, will our creature and slave — the barbarous masses — rise? When will the world find out that there is no such thing as a chosen people, but oppressors only? Might it not be better if we ourselves could wake up and find a country we could really call our own? In this country we should be oppressors no longer, but free citizens; not hated foreigners but natives of the land. Would it not be worthwhile to sacrifice the Golden Calf and the tommy-gun and found a country of our own by toil and sweat? Would it not be better to have secure homes in our own country rather than live a dangerous life as oppressors, bankers, dictators or as a ruling class, always haunted by the eternal trepidations and uncertainty of our position?

[Page 294]

The Learned Elders of Zion must have thought all this before, but no compromise is possible on the slopes of such chauvinistic lunacy. Still less is it possible when dealing with a nationalism of several thousand years’ standing, which has no other choice today but victory or death — world domination or destruction!

But the Christian people declare that there is yet another better way. For the enslaved world throttled by the grip of the symbolic serpent’s coils, there is the example of Christ with his scourge — Christ, the greatest “anti-Semite” of all. Behind the crucifix of Sadducean hatred He raises high the scourge among the money grabbers of the temple. This is the Christian counter-revolution which will replace all those values Judaism took away from mankind: respect for personal authority, the restoration of independence to the nations and of justice to the poor. It will favour the lot of the proletarian masses and will turn men’s eyes away from the material world towards the stars.

This is the Christian Resistance, this is the spirit of Maundy Thursday rising up against the world kingdom of the Jews. This is The New Testament, the truth of which will perhaps be victoriously vindicated in the last hour.

For St. Peter stands once more before the deceived masses of the people and, inspired by the Holy Ghost, cries aloud to those Judaised Gentiles who are “under the law” of the Jews:

“Save yourselves from this untoward generation!” (Acts ii. 40.)

Against the fulfillment of the commands in the Protocols the message of the New Age sounds clearly with its promise of freedom. During the last century another slogan said:

“Workers of the world unite!”

But today, in this suffering, half-ruined civilisation, the new slogan for an awakening people must be:

“Anti-Jewish people of the world unite before it is too late.”

[Page 295]

PDF of this complete book. Click to view or download (4.1 MB) >> (Available later)

[NOTE: Louis Marschalko was a Christian and as such his book reflects that. The purpose of posting his work is not to endorse his religious views but rather to present his study on the jews and their supremacist agenda of world conquest – KATANA]

The World

Conquerors

The Real War Criminals

by

Louis Marschalko

Part 18

Amazon Reviews

amazon.com

http://www.amazon.com/The-World-Conquerors-Louis-Marschalko/

9 of 14 people found the following review helpful

5 What a tremendous aid in understanding world events today.

By timothy k. price on December 25, 2013

This is a book that has to be read. Some people will protest and call it “anti-simetic” but this is not true.

A large tribe of people will deluge this site with protests against the book. Pay no attention to them. Read this book.

Showing 1 of 1 comments

Latimer the Cat 1 year ago

“What a tremendous aid in understanding world events today.”

Of course. Like it or not, today is a reflection of yesterday. Isn’t that why revisionist (real) history publishing was banned under the post 1917 judaic/communist incursion of Russia? Isn’t that why the other side of the coin (the NSDAP view) of what’s taught as WWII is never taught here in America even after 70+ years after the conflict?

8 of 12 people found the following review helpful

5 Must read

By john bebekon March 2, 2013

One of the most informative books I have read.If you want a unsanatised version of events, then this is the book.

Louis Marschalko tell’s it like it happened,and is still happening today.

11 of 14 people found the following review helpful

5 Truth Before It’s Time

By john thames “scholar1” on February 25, 2013

Long before the Holocaust denying Institute for Historical Review appeared on the scene, Louis Marschalko, a Hungarian, wrote a definitive expose of the six million myth in the context of a book exposing world-wide Jewish conspiracy. Remember, the book was published in English in the late 1950’s and got everything right long before its time. Although there are a few mangled quotations and slight errors of fact, Marschalko saw through the fog of propganda long before organized revisionism appeared on the scene. It is a remarkable book – and one still worth reading if you can find it.

19 of 23 people found the following review helpful

5 The Clearness of Marschalko.

By Paul Wasa on May 12, 2010

Mr. Marschalko does a good job in exposing the poisoning mind of the Jews worldwide.

He’s very well documented and has a very clear insight on things gone by. He analyzes the 2nd World War regarding the Jews and draws the most logical conclusions.

A book not only worth of being read, but I should say “a must” for younger people, who know nothing about WWII but from Jewish books and Jewish propaganda films, most of them untrue or biassed.

Paul Wasa.

Honest Critic 4 months ago

agreed… good read… goes hand in hand with a Greater Miracle of the Lost Ten Tribes Discovered and Fearless and Godly Pioneers for the Truth (which also gives a short bio. on Marshalko)… read it before you dismiss it.

31 of 34 people found the following review helpful

4 Controversial, but interesting

By S. Swink on August 27, 2007

Louis Marschalko — a Hungarian nationalist – published this book book in 1958. “The World Conquerors,” surveys the worldwide advance of communism from a decidedly Catholic perspective. The author’s argument is that communism is a worldwide movement, promoted everywhere by the same worldwide, transnational force.

In four chapters relating to WWII, “The Real Victors of the Second World War”, “Revenge is Ours”, “New Purim and Nuremberg”, and “What Has Become of Six Million Jews?”, Marschalko proves himself a one-man Institute for Historical Review.

Good Morning from the Zundelsite

Copyright (c) 1997 – Ingrid A. Rimland

September 23, 1997

In a book review published with permission from Granata Communications, below I give you yet another excellent summary of a classic:

Louis Marschalko’s book, “The World Conquerors,” first published in 1958, is more timely now than ever. It is one of those volumes whose prophesies lies in fulfillment.

Written by a Hungarian nationalist, it surveys the worldwide advance of communism as the unfolding of the scheme of the notorious “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”.

The book’s thesis is expounded in its first chapter. Entitled “The Oldest Nazism in the World”, Marschalko shows the bolshevism of the Old Testament. The Fuehrership of Moses laid the foundation for all that has come since.

Although not a study of organized religion, the author’s side comments show astounding clarity. The Catholic perspective of Mr. Marschalko underlies his opposition to “The World Conquerors” he exposes: Christianity as the antithesis of Judaism, Protestantism as a reversion to the barbarism of the Old Testament, the ancient worship of the Golden Calf as the basis for emerging capitalism.

The rest of the book piles fact upon fact to make its case. The Jewish background of communism is thoroughly explored. Much of the material is familiar. However, a very valuable survey of communism in South America is included. This reinforces the author’s argument that communism is a worldwide movement, promoted everywhere by the same worldwide, transnational force.

Moving on, Marschalko examines the real nature of the German National Socialist regime. Its achievements are noted, as well as the real reasons for the war. Hitler’s Germany had to be destroyed if the program of the “Protocols” were to be fulfilled.

The author provides much information on the persecution of the Germans in Poland at the time when such claims were almost universally dismissed as propaganda.

The section on World War II and its aftermath is astounding Revisionism ahead of its time. In four chapters, “The Real Victors of the Second World War”, “Revenge is Ours”, “New Purim and Nuremberg”, and “What Has Become of Six Million Jews?”, Marschalko proves himself a one-man Institute for Historical Review.

The Jewish staffing and orchestration of the Nuremberg Trial, the east-west collaboration in the hounding of “war criminals”, the real fate of the fabled Six Million, the setting up of Jewish persecution as the moral standard of the post war era, all are devastatingly analyzed to show the vested interests at work.

Even the well-informed reader will be amazed at the cohesion and extent of the Jewish revenge which was taken post-1945 in Europe. Each of these chapters can and should be expanded into full length books. Until that happens, these four chapters may be taken as a primer on the subject.

The rest of the book covers the post war era of the Cold War up to the date of publication, 1958. The Jewish involvement in the atomic bomb treason, the Hungarian uprising of 1956 and the efforts of the Jewish media to cover up anti-communist exposures by Senator Joseph McCarthy and others confirm the blackout on truth by “The World Conquerors”.

Particularly valuable is the voluminous evidence presented on the post-war Jewish control of the Soviet Union. Marschalko convincingly argues that the deportation of Western Russia’s Jews ahead of the Nazi invasion created a second Iron Curtain. The Jews were concentrated in the Soviet arms production factories behind the Ural Mountains. This allowed them to retain a key grip on power while denuding the western provinces where Jews were never popular.

The United Nations is also exposed as a front for Jews. A voluminous list of Jews in key positions is appended. In reviewing the evidence, it is difficult to conclude anything other than that the shoe fits.

If there is no Jewish conspiracy at work, the world has been treated to amazing coincidence. A better explanation is that Louis Marschalko is right. His presentation is logically lucid and well documented. It is also easily read and easily understood. A short book of only 296 pages, it is hardly all-inclusive. But as a statement of the essential facts, it has stood the test of time. It summarizes the facts and points the student in the proper direction for further research.

(Copyright 1958, reprinted 1983. Translated from the Hungarian by A. Suranyi. No Library of Congress #. No ISBN.)

Thought for the Day:

“There are persons, too, who see not the full extent of the evil which threatens them; they solace themselves with hopes that the enemy, if he succeed, will be merciful.”

“It is the madness of folly, to expect mercy from those who have refused to do justice; and even mercy, where conquest is the object, is only a trick of war; the cunning of the fox is as murderous as the violence of the wolf, and we ought to guard equally against both.”

(Thomas Paine)

The World

Conquerors

The Real War Criminals

by

Louis Marschalko

1958

English translation by A. Suranyi

Publisher: Britons Publishing Society, London

CONTENTS

CHAPTER

Introduction

1. The oldest “Nazism” in the World

2. The Meaning of Christ’s Resistance

3. World Domination in Three Stages

4. Millionaire Bankers Back Bolshevism

5. A Movement Maligned

6. The Real War Criminals

7. Why Hitler Had to Go

8. The Real Victors of the Second World War

9. “Revenge is Ours”.

10. New Purim and Nuremberg

11. What Has Become of Six Million Jews?

12. Spiritual and Economic Persecution

13. Biological Class-warfare Against All Nations

14. The Jews Have the Atom Bomb

15. The Betrayal of America

16. The Fulfilment of the Protocols and the Farewell Letter of a Hungarian Martyr

17. The Key Positions of Jewish World-Power

18. Secret Powers

19. The Hungarian Freedom Revolt

Epilogue

Dedication

To the memory of the Nationalist Martyrs

and victims of Bolshevism

About the Author

Louis Marschalkó

http: //en.metapedia.org/wiki/LouisMarschalko

Louis Marschalko (September 11, 1903 — May 20, 1968) was a Hungarian nationalist writer and author of The World Conquerors (1958).

His father was a secondary school teacher, his mother a musician.

He started to work for nationalistic newspapers. He lived in Debrecen until 1936, when he moved to Budapest. He wrote the booklet Who Betrayed Hungary in 1918-19. The booklet was banned after 1945, as anti-judaic and anti-semitic, even though the author had no influence to the fact that over 90% of the betrayers and Bolsheviks were Jews. He opened the eyes of the Hungarian readers with that book, since only few knew, that most the betrayers were Jews. Jews in Europe generally hide their Jewishness in the public.

He did not come home 1945, but had to remain in Munich, since otherwise the Bolshevists for sure had killed him. He wanted to emigrate to the USA, but having spent some months on Ellis Island in New York, the American immigration authorities refused his immigration application due to Jewish influences. He returned to Munich and worked as a simple worker, and wrote his books and articles at night.

Since Jews (Martin Himler and others) who betrayed Hungary and caused lot of suffering in Hungary, appeared after the Second World War in Europe as American officers in CIC uniforms, and gathered East-European patriots and delivered them to sure death under the Bolshevistic regime of their race-companions, wrote some scandalous smear books about Hungary and Hungarians, he wrote about the role of Jews in Hungary and in the world. (Conquestors of the Country, Conquestors of the World). He was also co-author of the book “Accusing Gallows” that described the tragic destiny of the last legal Hungarian administration. His book “Conquestors of the World” was published three times in the USA, but he did not receive any royalties.

He died in Munich, 1968. On his grave there are the words:

“For God, our country and freedom, forever”.

[Inside dustcover]

The Second World War was said to have been waged for “the rights of small nations,” but the author, like countless other Hungarians, is literally “on the run from Communism.” He has been living in exile since 1945 because of his anti-communist views, Although he was never a member of any party, the Communist regime of Hungary, with typical effrontery, demanded that the U.S.A. authorities “hand Louis Marschalko over as a war criminal.” A former special correspondent of two leading newspapers in pre-Communist Hungary, Marshalko is a brilliant novelist, playwright and poet and has many hundreds of articles to his credit. World Conquerors expresses some of the bitterness and contempt of millions of enslaved Europeans for the rulers of the “victorious nations.” It shows that by being urged to throw off the German yoke, the central European nations were tricked into becoming satellites of the Soviet.

World Conquerors indicts the real war criminals. It gives horrifying glimpses of the agony behind the Iron Curtain and describes the plot to extend the slave system to the Western world. Thousands of copies of the Hungarian edition have been sold and this English translation is published to warn the West. It is written by one who is a firm friend of the English-speaking people but an implacable foe of their vacillating and corrupt governments.

Chapter Eighteen

Secret Powers

The world conquerors would not be able to maintain their power for a moment without their auxiliary troops which they command from key positions. It is an appalling feature of our present-day world that the democracies and a certain section of the Christian Churches are controlled just as much by these auxiliary troops as are Bolshevik dictatorships and Masonic lodges. Parliaments and rulers, as well as the media of public entertainment such as the stage, radio and television, which are engaged in the systematic drugging of public opinion, are organised to act the part of auxiliary troops just as much as is the party congress of the Bolshevik dictatorships. But behind the governments, commissars and puppets of the opposition stands the Satanic Director — the Golden Calf — the “money power,” washing gold from the blood and sweat of the 2,500 million inhabitants of the earth.

How did this come about? Is the world really governed by a dark and evil power?

On the Russian front during the Second World War, an officer of the Spanish Blue Division found a file containing records of unique interest near the body of a Bolshevik police officer named Guzmin. These records, drawn up in 1939 by Guzmin, contained a statement by Rakovszky, then Soviet Ambassador in Paris, who was incriminated in the great conspiracy against General Mikhail Tukhachevsky. In the records, the authenticity of which seems to be beyond question, the veil obscuring Bolshevism is lifted and one of the greatest secrets of the world is exposed. They were dictated by an authentic witness, one of the closest collaborators of Lenin. Needless to say, Rakovszky was a Jew.

[Page 272]

Rakovszky frankly admits in the records that at the end of the First World War the position of Bolshevism became extremely critical due to the spread and progress of the Russian counter-revolution. At the end of 1917, the Bolsheviks had been driven back as far as the territory of the principality of Moscow. But at this moment a higher power appeared, which, according to Rakovszky, governs the world. This higher power acted from the West and stopped the flow of military and economic supplies for the counter-revolution, which up to then had been steady and reliable.

In a series of confidential confessions, Rakovszky also states in the records that the great financial crash on Wall Street in 1929 was the work of a mysterious group consisting of a few persons directed by a higher power. This same world power put to work Roosevelt’s famous New Deal, but on the other hand it also supported Hitler’s movement in its initial financial difficulties through the help of Hjalmar Schacht, who was a freemason.

“This world power is greater and more omnipotent than the Komintern itself,” said Rakovszky.

To Guzmin’s repeated question as to who were the holders of this world power, Rakovszky gave various evasive answers, such as: “Them”; “Those people”, etc. Apparently he did not want to pronounce the word Jew!

He said he did not know exactly who these people were. But he knew that they were omnipotent and within call anywhere. They had no visible form and appeared mostly in the guise of international financial interests. They are sometimes referred to as the “money power”. But one thing was certain: this world power would be sure to intervene should any overwhelming force arise to destroy Communism. Trotsky, more closely acquainted with these circles, on one occasion said to Rakovszky:

“The man who has succeeded in breaking the blockade closing round the Soviet is Walther Rathenau, the millionaire member of the Weimar government.”

These records also hint that this unknown world power is embodied in some kind of Freemasonic organization. But it is even more interesting to learn from Rakovszky that Karl Marx [birth name Moses Levy Mordecai, an Ashkenazi Jew, born May 5, 1818 in Prussia] was not the real founder of Communist world revolution. Its true father was Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Freemasonic order of the Illuminati. This Weishaupt, who came from Germany, was a pupil of Moses Mendelssohn, the Jewish philosopher.

Kuhn, Loeb and Co., according to 1935 statistics, controlled a fortune of four billion dollars, and today [1957] no doubt control much more.

[Page 273]

The world policy of this secret power is most interesting. Jewry’s hatred of the Czarist Russia was so great that this same bank, Kuhn, Loeb and Co., made a loan of 130 million dollars to the Japanese in order to finance the Russo-Japanese War. In later years, when it appeared that the Bolsheviks would be defeated, at the end of the First World War, it saved Bolshevism, too. It knew very well that the victory of the counter-revolution leading to the revenge of the tortured and cheated Russian people would end in the destruction of Russian Jewry.

But the most horrible chapter of this satanic policy is when, according not only to Rakovszky but to other reliable German sources, this same world power gives still larger sums to Hitler and National Socialism, in order to help Hitler and his movement over initial difficulties. They knew that if Hitler succeeded in taking over power, Germany could be forced into a new war. The real aim was not only the destruction of German National Socialism, but something even greater: the realisation of the final great and glorious aspiration, which is the biological destruction and enslavement of all non-Jewish nations.

Certain parts of Rakovszky’s statements attain impressive heights. He must have been familiar with the nature of this secret world power to have prophesied from a prison cell as early as 1938:

“Hitler will shake hands with Stalin in order to be able to liquidate Poland, and Stalin will accept Hitler’s offer [The Germany-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact, 23 August 1939]. Though both of them will thus have attacked a Catholic country important to the West, nevertheless the West will declare one of them only to be the aggressor, and that will be Hitler’s Germany.”

Grand Orient records relating to the Great Council’s meeting on May 29th, 1939, fell into the hands of the German counter-espionage service before the outbreak of the last war. From these it becomes evident that Arthur Groussier, the Grand Master, at this time had important consultations with Roosevelt’s ambassador at Paris, Mr. Bullitt, who was informed of the viewpoint of the Grand Orient, according to which all possible steps were to be taken to prevent any understanding on the Polish question being reached either between Hitler and the Poles, or between Hitler and the European powers. Chamberlain was told as early as March, 1939, that if he continued his conciliatory policy, the U.S.A. would withdraw all moral and financial support from Great Britain.

[Page 274]

The records of the Jewish Congress [the February 1936 Catholic Gazette article describes extracts from a series of speeches given at a secret meeting of B’nai B’rith that took place “recently” in Paris, likely December 1935 or January 1936],  which was held in Paris well before the Second World War, were published in the Catholic Gazette of February, 1936. At this congress, we are told, the secret world power demonstrated the full magnitude of its arrogance. The speakers referred proudly to the fact that the most important leaders of all nations were freemasons and were thus mobilised for the promotion of Israel’s aspirations.

“We are masters of war and of peace!” sounds the confident challenge of the world conquerors.

“France fell into our hands; Great Britain depends upon our money and is our slave. Many other States and nations, including the U.S.A., bow before our power and organisation.”

That this world power not only exists, but is in fact master of the world, is strongly emphasised, firstly by Rakovszky’s statements, secondly by ex-King Alfonso XIII, thirdly in secret reports found by the Germans after the occupation of Paris, fourthly by Forrestal’s diary, and lastly by the confidential papers of a Polish diplomat:

Comte Jean Szembek, one of the leading officials of the Polish Foreign Office, published his diary in France under the title Journal 1933-1939. Here he records his talk with the King of Spain, Alfonso XIII, on February 19th, 1939.

“The Spanish king has formed a very pessimistic opinion of the world situation,” says the diary. “World Jewry and freemasonry play a very important role in the attempt to unleash war.”

On July 6th, 1939, Jerzy Potocki, Polish ambassador to the U.S.A., returned to Warsaw from Washington to report to his government. In the course of his account he says:

“There are all sorts of people in the West driving us to war: the Jews, the big Capitalists and the armament firms. They feel they are entering an era of prosperity. They regard and handle us like Negroes, whose only duty is to work and sweat in the interest of multiplying their capital.”

[Page 275]

The Jews and freemasons found allies in unexpected circles. On March 19th, 1939, Comte Szembek visited Count Wlodimir Ledóchowski, the General of the Jesuit Order, and recorded the following:

“I happened by chance to be present during Count Ledochowszky’s consultation with Cardinal Francesco Marmaggi about the arrival of a deputation from the Spanish Falange. [Fascist movement that merged with traditional right-wing elements in 1937 to form the ruling party under General Franco] During their talk both of them sharply condemned Fascism and Hitlerism and arrived at the conclusion that the Falange was a similar movement. Ledochowszky referred to all of these systems as the ‘opera del diavolo’, i.e., ‘works of the devil’…”

On April 21st, 1939, Monsignor Montini, the papal legate to Poland at that time, told Comte Szembek that according to the official viewpoint of the Vatican, should Poland decide on war, it would be a just and rightful war.

Szembek also records in his memoirs that on August 11th, 1939, the Polish ambassador to the Vatican said to him that;

“an unbending attitude is to be maintained towards Germany and that this policy is openly encouraged by the Vatican!”

And so we find even the Vatican itself ranged among the satellites of the world conquerors, without apparently pausing to consider the inherent danger of Bolshevism.

We have dealt already with the key positions held by the world conquerors. But the political advance was only a rather modest consequence of that economic world power which world Jewry captured as early as the beginning of this century in order to dominate the nations.

The appearance of this mysterious world power was referred to by Marxists, Leninists, and other dreamy-headed Socialists, as “dollar imperialism”. Though the flags of the “dollar imperialists” were carried by Americans who died defending them, nevertheless behind these flags of a politically ignorant and inexperienced new and powerful nation [America] stood the world conquerors, who, in fact, are marching today towards the subjection of all free and independent peoples.

We will give a few examples to illustrate this. Speyer and Co., the great Jewish banking house, in 1903, gave Mexico her first twelve and a half million-dollar loan. They acquired by this transaction all oil concessions in Mexico. Rockefeller, Morgan, Jacob Schiff and the other great Jewish financiers followed suit and thus almost all the natural resources of Mexico fell into Jewish hands. Bernard Mannes Baruch, the National City Bank under Jewish management, and Guggenheim, the Jewish copper magnate, became the real masters of Mexico.

[Page 276]

In 1906, the same world conquerors obtained monopolies over Nicaragua’s national income from customs and excise and also over her railways and shipping lines.

The banking house of Kuhn, Loeb and Co. was one of the founders as well as chief financier of the Panama Canal Co.

The major part of Cuba’s industry is controlled by the Guggenheims.

Bolivia was turned into a colony of “dollar imperialism” by Speyer and Guggenheim, who exploited the zinc mines.

Since 1935, thirty-five percent of the potassium nitrate and ninety percent of the copper industry of Chile is in the hands of the Guggenheim and Morgan Trusts.

In Peru, the copper mines are in the hands of the Seligmans and Goldschmidts.

Lord Melchett, under his original name of Mond, controls the nickel industry of Canada. Out of a total of thirty billion dollars which constitute the national assets of Canada, a total of three billion is in the hands of the Jews.

Foreign trade with China was organised by the Morgans and also by the National City Bank and, of course, by Kuhn, Loeb. Later, the International Banking Corporation, led by Edward H. Harriman the railway king, and Isaac Guggenheimer, began the economic “exploitation” of China. Schiff, Morgan, Kuhn, Loeb, and Harriman made fortunes out of railway construction in that country.

According to Rakovszky, similar forces rescued Bolshevism, and with the ultimate aim of destroying Germany, supported Hitler’s movement in its early days. They were also behind the Ribbentrop-Stalin [non aggression] pact and total aerial warfare, the expulsion of eighteen million Germans from their homelands [post WW II] leading to the enslavement of Europe, and the suppression of those Asiatic nations struggling for independence.

This world power identifies itself with the Nuremberg Trials, with the sordid bargaining at Yalta, whilst the death of the democrat Forrestal as well as that of the Communist Zhdanov was due to the fact that these men wished to bring about a showdown between the Bolshevik and Capitalist world. It exterminated many of the leaders of the European Christian peoples under the pretext of “war crimes”, and from this has been hatched the latest theory of co-existence to save the Soviet Union. Rakovszky informs us that this “higher” power disclosed its real identity during the trial of the atom spies.

[Page 277]

Why did Julius Rosenberg refuse to tell the court the names of those who gave him his orders, though he could have saved his own and his wife’s life by doing so?

The answer is simple! This small and unimportant Jew was, together with his accomplices, the agent of this “higher” power. It was not on his own initiative that he passed on atomic secrets to Kaganovich and his friends. Certain persons ordered him to do so; certain persons succeeded in convincing him that it was a sacred, patriotic and religious duty for him — a small but loyal Jew — to pass on to the Kremlin the secret of the atomic bomb, and by so doing to prevent a third world war which would lead to the total extermination of Jewry.

What is certain, however, is that these comparatively unimportant Jews, Rosenberg and his wife Ethel, died like martyrs, taking with them to the grave one of the greatest secrets of the twentieth century. Those Jews who followed their coffins to the cemetery in a funeral procession enlivened by dramatic and fanatical incidents, knew very well that this couple had sacrificed their own lives for the survival of world Jewry. And thus, the names of the real culprits were never disclosed.

In its issue of June 15th, 1955, La Voix de la Paix, a French paper, published an interesting article from the pen of a leftist writer, throwing, though surely quite unintentionally, a very sharp light on the basic nature of “democracies” governed from key positions.

“The French Parliament itself,” he writes, “is a type of closed society in which the representatives of the great banking groups meet. These consist of: (1) L’Union des Banques Américaines which is represented in the French political field by René Pleven, who began his career as Jean Monnet’s secretary; (2) L’Union Européenne, to which the banking houses of the Rothschilds belong. This group is represented politically by René Mayer, a former director of the Rothschild concerns.”

In this short article a startling picture is presented, showing that the France of St. Louis is today under the dictatorship of various Jewish financial groups aided by rotten democratic parliamentarians, and that at the same time she serves as one of the main bases of the international conspiracy which is strangling the world.

[Page 278]

Among the many exposures of this secret world power to appear after the Second World War, perhaps Francis Quisney’s article is the most remarkable. It was published in the periodical Der Weg, edited in Argentina, and dealt with the world policy of the Rockefellers. To put it shortly, the present head of the “Christian” banking house of Rockefellers, Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller, has been working for a long time in close touch with the Jewish banking house of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. of New York. During the Second World War Roosevelt appointed Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller to the post of Coordinator of Hemisphere Defence, the purpose of which was “to keep in hand” the South American States and to control the South American markets.

It would fill a volume to attempt to describe in detail the fatal role played by the head of the Rockefeller banking house in the Bolshevisation of the world while under the influence of Kuhn, Loeb and Co., who financed the Bolshevik Revolution and the atomic bomb. In the Wall Street Journal of May 13th, 1948, Ray Cromley, an American journalist, confirmed that not only at Yalta but well before that conference, a secret agreement had been concluded between Nelson A. Rockefeller on the one hand and Andrei Gromyko, the Jewish representative of the Kremlin, on the other, to divide the globe into two hemispheres. The demarcation line bisecting the globe runs by the Eastern frontiers of Finland, and continuing along the shores of Sweden, cuts through divided Germany to run along the Eastern frontiers of Austria, from where it follows the Northern limits of Turkey and ends at the Persian Gulf. This secret agreement between the Eastern and Western conspirators took into consideration the fact that the rich oil fields of Saudi Arabia must remain under the control of the Rockefellers and of the Jewish oil magnates behind them. Another alarming part of this exposure is the statement, duly supported by evidence, that the oil delivered by the Saudi Arabian plants of Rockefeller and of Kuhn, Loeb and Co. for the Communist war machine, made it possible for the Korean Reds to carry out their attack on South Korea.

Upon several occasions, Bolshevism was saved from destruction by a secret Western conspiracy. The same secret power originally saved it through exerting pressure through the British trade unions and American bankers to put a stop to the anti-Bolshevik war of intervention; later on it helped Stalin in the industrialisation of the Soviet Union.

[Page 279]

It saved the Soviet Union again when at the time of the Ribbentrop-Stalin [non-aggression] pact, Hitler only was singled out as the enemy. It saved the Soviet once more when La Guardia handed over the eleven and a half billion dollar cheque to Litvinov, and yet another time when the second front was prematurely established by the invasion of Europe without waiting for the armies of the German and Russian dictatorships “to bleed one another to death”.

This was done, although Truman (whom we can regard as the only “anti-Semite” President of the U.S. since Jefferson) had said at the time of the outbreak of the Soviet-German War in 1941:

“Let them kill one another. We will later have to support the weaker party.”

Truman was still only a Vice-President and Roosevelt nearing the end of his days when the suggestion settling the Soviet question for good was being seriously considered by the Western world. Truman even conceived the possibility of destroying Bolshevism and Hitler together in one opportune swoop. This was the very last chance for the democracies and for the free world to secure real victory.

Consultations were begun with the military leaders of the defeated German Army. It was proposed that after a formal capitulation, the Germans would join forces with the Western allies and fall on the exhausted Soviet armies. All those who lived in Europe during those feverish times sensed that the world was on the threshold of a new clash, which would decide the fate of mankind. It appeared that although German Nazism might be destroyed, nevertheless, the victorious Wehrmacht [unified armed forces of Germany from 1935 to 1945] would march again in alliance with the even more victorious British and American forces.

In March, 1945, the operators of the German and Hungarian radio stations, and the General Staffs, knew that the Soviet Union was at the point of collapse. In Hungary and in the East German territories the coded messages sent to Moscow by the various Soviet commands were intercepted and decoded. They all consisted of desperate calls for the “victorious” Soviet generals for help — for weapons, ammunition and reinforcements.

But at this time, when the democracies had the opportunity of wiping out Bolshevism with the help of German National Socialism, the mysterious power mentioned in Rakovszky’s records once more intervened through the person of a typical puppet — General Dwight Eisenhower, who later became President of the United States.

[Page 280]

The news of the negotiations between the German Wehrmacht and the British were no idle tales. Rokossovsky, the “red” Field Marshal and recent Commander-in-Chief of the Polish Communist armies, brought to light some remarkable details about this matter. He said that Marshal Georgy Zhukov possessed proofs of the fact that in April, 1945, the British intended to conclude an agreement with the German Wehrmacht to swoop down on the Soviet armies which had advanced far into Western Europe. Meanwhile, the Soviet High Command intercepted and decoded the telecommunications between British and German headquarters. The sole condition was that the German Army should offer its capitulation by April 22nd, 1945. A combined attack would immediately follow in order to force back the Soviet armies, at least as far as the Oder.

A British Army colonel was believed to have given this plan away to Eisenhower, who in turn promptly told the British that if they helped the Germans against the Bolsheviks, he would cut off all vital war materials from Great Britain who would be obliged to go it alone.

And today Marshal Zhukov refers to the moment constituting perhaps the last chance for the freedom of mankind by saying:

“The intervention of my good friend Eisenhower foiled this treacherous plan.” (Das Neue Zeitalter, of September 28th, 1957.)

And so Roosevelt’s tame general, the influential master of American freemasonry, of whom General MacArthur remarked tartly: “Eisenhower was not my staff officer but my clerk” — destroyed the last hope of mankind. The Soviet Union was not only saved but became one of the strongest powers in the world. After this, it was only natural that the favourite of Baruch and Morgenthau and the executor of the Morgenthau Plan, should become President of the United States, while the powers behind the scenes prevented the nominations of Taft and MacArthur for the presidential elections. Once Eisenhower was elected to the presidential post, the investigations of the McCarthy Committee were stopped. The world conquerors returned to the White House, and in view of subsequent events even a child can understand the indifferent attitude towards the historical Hungarian Rebellion on November 4th, 1956, as well as this omission to give it any effective help.

[Page 281]

Thanks to Mr. Eisenhower the Eastern half of Jewish world power was saved again. Through the irresponsibility of this careerist puppet-soldier the secrets of the rockets fell into Soviet hands also. On learning of the approach of the Bolsheviks, the German scientists evacuated Penemuende in 1945. The V-1 and V-2 types of rocket had been made here, and the V-9, the equivalent of the Soviet sputnik of 1958, was also ready. The German scientists brought with them fifty-four waggons of blueprints and scientific material, which they intended to hand over to the Americans. The American C.I.C., which at this time consisted almost exclusively of world conquerors, ordered the German scientists to leave the fifty-four waggons of scientific material in the hands of the Soviet. The scientists themselves would be allowed access to the territory occupied by the American forces, but bringing only 100 pounds of personal luggage per head. It may be asked whether these things were known to Eisenhower — Morgenthau’s Commander in Chief. This may be open to question. But the fact remains that the secrets of the rockets, like the secrets of the atomic bomb, fell into the hands of the Soviet.

So to the question, “Is there a supranational conspiracy covering all nations?” we cannot give any other answer but a definite “Yes!”

This conspiracy has taken form and intervened in every great crisis affecting mankind. It had its hand in the French Revolution, in the Socialist-Communist movements of the 19th century and in the peace treaties after the First World War. Its features became visible for an instant in 1917 when Czarist Russia was destroyed, and according to the above quoted records of Rakovszky it was owing to this conspiracy that Bolshevism was saved during the time when the Russian counter-revolution was on the point of achieving success. This mysterious power started the Second World War, destroyed Christian Europe and exterminated the European intellectual elite. This mysterious conspiratorial power passed on the secret of the atomic bomb to the Soviet, and it betrayed America.

[Page 282]

Who, then, are the members of this conspiratorial group? There is no doubt that in the first place are to be found the leaders of world Jewry, the obsessed fanatics of Old Testament world-conquering “Nazism”, directed by the bankers of the great international finance groups and interests and also by the chief commissars of Bolshevism, i.e., the masters of the Kremlin. Perhaps all of these cannot be included, but there are many amongst them fighting under the leadership of Kaganovich for the establishment of the Jewish world kingdom.

Almost more dangerous than these conspiratorial leaders are the “auxiliary” troops they succeeded in rallying to their cause nearly half a century ago. According to the latest statistics, there are more than six million freemasons in the world, and four million of them are in the United States. The majority of these freemasons are probably not Communists, but nonetheless they are unintentionally promoting Communist aims. Furthermore, motivated by financial or material interests or convictions, they are consciously serving the Jewish aspirations, the final target of which is Communism, and through Communism the establishment of totalitarian Jewish dictatorship and the complete abolition of human freedom.

To understand the colossal dimensions and consequences of this conspiracy we must realise that mankind lives today in what we might term a “threshold age”, and has perhaps already passed from the Iron Age into the Atomic Age. It does not need much imagination to see that the world is over-populated and that the future of the whole globe — the life and bread of the population — depends upon greatly increasing production through the most efficient use of atomic energy. This energy, which might be a source of evil or, on the other hand, a heavenly blessing, is controlled by a closed group of the prophets of supranational “Nazism”. The majority of mankind is already helpless against this group which by means of atomic blast experiments served its own profit-making interests only, regardless of the fact that is has by now possibly poisoned our water and our bread and even affected the genes of our unborn children by atomic radiation. What will happen if this group takes over exclusive control of this fatal energy under the title of “atomic energy for peaceful purposes”? It is neither a Utopian concept nor a nightmarish dream, but on the contrary, highly probable that this energy may prove to be the medium for the establishment of world dictatorship. Only that continent which submits unconditionally will receive fuel and electric energy. Those not prepared to serve this Jewish group and thus to ensure retaining their position near the top of the social pyramid enjoying the sunny side of life, but who would dare to resist the general exploitation, will perish miserably. For this Old Testament “Nazism” knows neither mercy nor humanity.

[Page 283]

If its power is not soon eradicated, and if it continues to enjoy political, economic and intellectual monopolies, then in one or two decades the totalitarian world terror will come, bringing the destruction of human freedom, together with that of the free spirit of mankind and of all human ideals, including the concept of one’s own native land and of national pride. There will remain in the end, on one side, the helot-masses amounting to four billion enslaved people without national, racial or religious ties, and on the other, fifteen million chosen people who fulfilled the prophecy in Torah and became indeed the masters of all nations.

[Page 284]

[NOTE: Louis Marschalko was a Christian and as such his book reflects that. The purpose of posting his work is not to endorse his religious views but rather to present his study on the jews and their supremacist agenda of world conquest – KATANA]

The World

Conquerors

The Real War Criminals

by

Louis Marschalko

Part 16

Amazon Reviews

amazon.com

http://www.amazon.com/The-World-Conquerors-Louis-Marschalko/

9 of 14 people found the following review helpful

5 What a tremendous aid in understanding world events today.

By timothy k. price on December 25, 2013

This is a book that has to be read. Some people will protest and call it “anti-simetic” but this is not true.

A large tribe of people will deluge this site with protests against the book. Pay no attention to them. Read this book.

Showing 1 of 1 comments

Latimer the Cat 1 year ago

“What a tremendous aid in understanding world events today.”

Of course. Like it or not, today is a reflection of yesterday. Isn’t that why revisionist (real) history publishing was banned under the post 1917 judaic/communist incursion of Russia? Isn’t that why the other side of the coin (the NSDAP view) of what’s taught as WWII is never taught here in America even after 70+ years after the conflict?

8 of 12 people found the following review helpful

5 Must read

By john bebekon March 2, 2013

One of the most informative books I have read.If you want a unsanatised version of events, then this is the book.

Louis Marschalko tell’s it like it happened,and is still happening today.

11 of 14 people found the following review helpful

5 Truth Before It’s Time

By john thames “scholar1” on February 25, 2013

Long before the Holocaust denying Institute for Historical Review appeared on the scene, Louis Marschalko, a Hungarian, wrote a definitive expose of the six million myth in the context of a book exposing world-wide Jewish conspiracy. Remember, the book was published in English in the late 1950’s and got everything right long before its time. Although there are a few mangled quotations and slight errors of fact, Marschalko saw through the fog of propganda long before organized revisionism appeared on the scene. It is a remarkable book – and one still worth reading if you can find it.

19 of 23 people found the following review helpful

5 The Clearness of Marschalko.

By Paul Wasa on May 12, 2010

Mr. Marschalko does a good job in exposing the poisoning mind of the Jews worldwide.

He’s very well documented and has a very clear insight on things gone by. He analyzes the 2nd World War regarding the Jews and draws the most logical conclusions.

A book not only worth of being read, but I should say “a must” for younger people, who know nothing about WWII but from Jewish books and Jewish propaganda films, most of them untrue or biassed.

Paul Wasa.

Honest Critic 4 months ago

agreed… good read… goes hand in hand with a Greater Miracle of the Lost Ten Tribes Discovered and Fearless and Godly Pioneers for the Truth (which also gives a short bio. on Marshalko)… read it before you dismiss it.

31 of 34 people found the following review helpful

4 Controversial, but interesting

By S. Swink on August 27, 2007

Louis Marschalko — a Hungarian nationalist – published this book book in 1958. “The World Conquerors,” surveys the worldwide advance of communism from a decidedly Catholic perspective. The author’s argument is that communism is a worldwide movement, promoted everywhere by the same worldwide, transnational force.

In four chapters relating to WWII, “The Real Victors of the Second World War”, “Revenge is Ours”, “New Purim and Nuremberg”, and “What Has Become of Six Million Jews?”, Marschalko proves himself a one-man Institute for Historical Review.

Good Morning from the Zundelsite

Copyright (c) 1997 – Ingrid A. Rimland

September 23, 1997

In a book review published with permission from Granata Communications, below I give you yet another excellent summary of a classic:

Louis Marschalko’s book, “The World Conquerors,” first published in 1958, is more timely now than ever. It is one of those volumes whose prophesies lies in fulfillment.

Written by a Hungarian nationalist, it surveys the worldwide advance of communism as the unfolding of the scheme of the notorious “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”.

The book’s thesis is expounded in its first chapter. Entitled “The Oldest Nazism in the World”, Marschalko shows the bolshevism of the Old Testament. The Fuehrership of Moses laid the foundation for all that has come since.

Although not a study of organized religion, the author’s side comments show astounding clarity. The Catholic perspective of Mr. Marschalko underlies his opposition to “The World Conquerors” he exposes: Christianity as the antithesis of Judaism, Protestantism as a reversion to the barbarism of the Old Testament, the ancient worship of the Golden Calf as the basis for emerging capitalism.

The rest of the book piles fact upon fact to make its case. The Jewish background of communism is thoroughly explored. Much of the material is familiar. However, a very valuable survey of communism in South America is included. This reinforces the author’s argument that communism is a worldwide movement, promoted everywhere by the same worldwide, transnational force.

Moving on, Marschalko examines the real nature of the German National Socialist regime. Its achievements are noted, as well as the real reasons for the war. Hitler’s Germany had to be destroyed if the program of the “Protocols” were to be fulfilled.

The author provides much information on the persecution of the Germans in Poland at the time when such claims were almost universally dismissed as propaganda.

The section on World War II and its aftermath is astounding Revisionism ahead of its time. In four chapters, “The Real Victors of the Second World War”, “Revenge is Ours”, “New Purim and Nuremberg”, and “What Has Become of Six Million Jews?”, Marschalko proves himself a one-man Institute for Historical Review.

The Jewish staffing and orchestration of the Nuremberg Trial, the east-west collaboration in the hounding of “war criminals”, the real fate of the fabled Six Million, the setting up of Jewish persecution as the moral standard of the post war era, all are devastatingly analyzed to show the vested interests at work.

Even the well-informed reader will be amazed at the cohesion and extent of the Jewish revenge which was taken post-1945 in Europe. Each of these chapters can and should be expanded into full length books. Until that happens, these four chapters may be taken as a primer on the subject.

The rest of the book covers the post war era of the Cold War up to the date of publication, 1958. The Jewish involvement in the atomic bomb treason, the Hungarian uprising of 1956 and the efforts of the Jewish media to cover up anti-communist exposures by Senator Joseph McCarthy and others confirm the blackout on truth by “The World Conquerors”.

Particularly valuable is the voluminous evidence presented on the post-war Jewish control of the Soviet Union. Marschalko convincingly argues that the deportation of Western Russia’s Jews ahead of the Nazi invasion created a second Iron Curtain. The Jews were concentrated in the Soviet arms production factories behind the Ural Mountains. This allowed them to retain a key grip on power while denuding the western provinces where Jews were never popular.

The United Nations is also exposed as a front for Jews. A voluminous list of Jews in key positions is appended. In reviewing the evidence, it is difficult to conclude anything other than that the shoe fits.

If there is no Jewish conspiracy at work, the world has been treated to amazing coincidence. A better explanation is that Louis Marschalko is right. His presentation is logically lucid and well documented. It is also easily read and easily understood. A short book of only 296 pages, it is hardly all-inclusive. But as a statement of the essential facts, it has stood the test of time. It summarizes the facts and points the student in the proper direction for further research.

(Copyright 1958, reprinted 1983. Translated from the Hungarian by A. Suranyi. No Library of Congress #. No ISBN.)

Thought for the Day:

“There are persons, too, who see not the full extent of the evil which threatens them; they solace themselves with hopes that the enemy, if he succeed, will be merciful.”

“It is the madness of folly, to expect mercy from those who have refused to do justice; and even mercy, where conquest is the object, is only a trick of war; the cunning of the fox is as murderous as the violence of the wolf, and we ought to guard equally against both.”

(Thomas Paine)

The World

Conquerors

The Real War Criminals

by

Louis Marschalko

1958

English translation by A. Suranyi

Publisher: Britons Publishing Society, London

CONTENTS

CHAPTER

Introduction

1. The oldest “Nazism” in the World

2. The Meaning of Christ’s Resistance

3. World Domination in Three Stages

4. Millionaire Bankers Back Bolshevism

5. A Movement Maligned

6. The Real War Criminals

7. Why Hitler Had to Go

8. The Real Victors of the Second World War

9. “Revenge is Ours”.

10. New Purim and Nuremberg

11. What Has Become of Six Million Jews?

12. Spiritual and Economic Persecution

13. Biological Class-warfare Against All Nations

14. The Jews Have the Atom Bomb

15. The Betrayal of America

16. The Fulfilment of the Protocols and the Farewell Letter of a Hungarian Martyr

17. The Key Positions of Jewish World-Power

18. Secret Powers

19. The Hungarian Freedom Revolt

Epilogue

Dedication

To the memory of the Nationalist Martyrs

and victims of Bolshevism

About the Author

Louis Marschalkó

http: //en.metapedia.org/wiki/LouisMarschalko

Louis Marschalko (September 11, 1903 — May 20, 1968) was a Hungarian nationalist writer and author of The World Conquerors (1958).

His father was a secondary school teacher, his mother a musician.

He started to work for nationalistic newspapers. He lived in Debrecen until 1936, when he moved to Budapest. He wrote the booklet Who Betrayed Hungary in 1918-19. The booklet was banned after 1945, as anti-judaic and anti-semitic, even though the author had no influence to the fact that over 90% of the betrayers and Bolsheviks were Jews. He opened the eyes of the Hungarian readers with that book, since only few knew, that most the betrayers were Jews. Jews in Europe generally hide their Jewishness in the public.

He did not come home 1945, but had to remain in Munich, since otherwise the Bolshevists for sure had killed him. He wanted to emigrate to the USA, but having spent some months on Ellis Island in New York, the American immigration authorities refused his immigration application due to Jewish influences. He returned to Munich and worked as a simple worker, and wrote his books and articles at night.

Since Jews (Martin Himler and others) who betrayed Hungary and caused lot of suffering in Hungary, appeared after the Second World War in Europe as American officers in CIC uniforms, and gathered East-European patriots and delivered them to sure death under the Bolshevistic regime of their race-companions, wrote some scandalous smear books about Hungary and Hungarians, he wrote about the role of Jews in Hungary and in the world. (Conquestors of the Country, Conquestors of the World). He was also co-author of the book “Accusing Gallows” that described the tragic destiny of the last legal Hungarian administration. His book “Conquestors of the World” was published three times in the USA, but he did not receive any royalties.

He died in Munich, 1968. On his grave there are the words:

“For God, our country and freedom, forever”.

[Inside dustcover]

The Second World War was said to have been waged for “the rights of small nations,” but the author, like countless other Hungarians, is literally “on the run from Communism.” He has been living in exile since 1945 because of his anti-communist views, Although he was never a member of any party, the Communist regime of Hungary, with typical effrontery, demanded that the U.S.A. authorities “hand Louis Marschalko over as a war criminal.” A former special correspondent of two leading newspapers in pre-Communist Hungary, Marshalko is a brilliant novelist, playwright and poet and has many hundreds of articles to his credit. World Conquerors expresses some of the bitterness and contempt of millions of enslaved Europeans for the rulers of the “victorious nations.” It shows that by being urged to throw off the German yoke, the central European nations were tricked into becoming satellites of the Soviet.

World Conquerors indicts the real war criminals. It gives horrifying glimpses of the agony behind the Iron Curtain and describes the plot to extend the slave system to the Western world. Thousands of copies of the Hungarian edition have been sold and this English translation is published to warn the West. It is written by one who is a firm friend of the English-speaking people but an implacable foe of their vacillating and corrupt governments.

Chapter Sixteen

The Fulfillment of the Protocols

and the

Farewell Letter of a Hungarian Martyr 

In analysing the present-day world position we cannot emphasise enough the importance of a fact that nobody seems to be willing to face, i.e., that Jewry, who succeeded in unleashing two world wars among the Christian nations and who, as we pointed out in previous chapters, was the principal war criminal of the Second World War, does not consider it to be in its interest to allow a showdown with the Soviet or with Bolshevism generally. This would not be in the interest of Jewry because once the Bolshevik dictatorship was defeated, the world would learn who were the real murderers, hangmen, commissars and jailers of the enslaved nations and perpetrators of biological class warfare.

Beside their dreams of world power, the horrible alliance of a guilty conscience is the connecting factor between Eastern and Western Jews. People who cannot understand why world Jewry strives to prevent America fighting against Bolshevism and why the Iron Curtain is kept up between East and West, would do well to read the statement of Dr. Goldman, American leader of the World Jewish Congress, according to which “a third world war would mean the total extermination of Jewry”, Pinkas Lubianker, leader of the Israeli delegation in London, said essentially the same thing. Solem Traitsman, Chief Rabbi of Communist Poland, let the cat out of the bag when he sent out the following circular to world Jewry in 1951, urging them to sign the Soviet peace petitions:

“For Jewry the end of peace would mean their own end. The third world war is a new weapon in the hands of Jewry’s ancient arch enemies. The peace petitions, whether they are instituted by the right or the left, must be signed under all circumstances by the majority of mankind, but above all by Jewry. As for Jewry, this is not a question of ‘East versus West’. For Jewry, this is a question of life or death!”

[Page 226]

The rabbis in France joined the peace movements and made similar statements, and neither is it accidental that in 1950, 160,000 Jews in Israel signed Communist peace petitions. The percentage of those who signed, said the Daily Worker, is greater in Israel than in any other country, except the Soviet Union!

Now we can understand better why the Soviets had to be presented with the secrets of the atomic bomb, why the Iron Curtain is kept up as well as the purpose of the false peace slogans and the slogans of co-existence and why the cold war continues. We also see why there is no active European defence community and no European Army. It becomes plainer why nations are enslaved and bisected and why half of mankind tolerates the existence of the Soviet slave camps.

The answer is simple. World power over both hemispheres is in the hands of world Jewry.

It was said that the Protocols of Zion were forgeries. But within half a century the Great Vision came true. In this short time world Jewry has passed the first two stages of the struggle for world power and has come close to the third as well, but has not yet definitely removed its mask.

But actual world power is now in the hands of the world conquerors and it is only a question of time until Eastern and Western Jews shake hands openly across the enslaved nations and barbarised masses.

In 1904, Chaim Weizmann commented as follows on Theodor Herzl’s Judenstaat [Jewish State]:

“Four years ago world Jewry was divided into two camps: one on the east and one on the west. And when Herzl arrived and said to us that we must unite Eastern and Western Jewry, and we carried out this order accordingly. Our unity today is Theodor Herzl’s legacy to the Jewish people.”

Theodor Herzl’s Judenstaat states: “Wir sind ein Volk!” — “We are one people!” And today this is the only unity existing in a world divided into two hemispheres.

[Page 227]

“We are one people despite the ostensible rifts, cracks and differences between the American and Soviet democracies. We are one people and it is not in our interests that the West should liberate the East, for in doing this and in liberating the enslaved nations, the West would inevitably deprive Jewry of the Eastern half of its world power.”

The great programme of the Protocols is nearly accomplished and this is the best proof of their authenticity. Fifty years ago, the League of Nations and U.N.O. [United Nations Organization] was nothing but a dream, but the authors of the Protocols clearly envisaged the role and purpose of these organisations.

Thus to replace the unsuccessful and extinct League of Nations, U.N.O. was established, with its palace built at Lake Success (Lake Success, New York, temporary home of U.N.O. from 1946-1951] where under the blue and white colours of Zion the governments of the world unite. In Korea, American soldiers died fighting under Zionist colours. In these circumstances, therefore, the United Nations can rightly be regarded as the most accomplished and most perfected power organisation of world Jewry.

The formation of the Jewish world government is not yet announced officially. But Einstein, the prophet, together with the Organisation of World Federalists and the Federalist Organisations of several European countries, are openly proclaiming this. (See the programme of the World Federalists.) In that part of New York State most densely populated by Jews, Senator Herbert H. Lehman and Jacob Javits are elected under this programme.

The most important section of the United Nations is U.N.E.S.C.O. (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). It is almost exclusively in the control of Jewry. U.N.E.S.C.O. wishes to direct and control the education of the entire youth of the world. This is, in fact, also one of the instructions of the Protocols of Zion:

“We must so direct the education of the Goyim communities that whenever they come upon a matter requiring initiative they may drop their hands in despairing impotence.” (Protocol V)

U.N.E.S.C.O. is, therefore, the leading organisation envisaged by the authors of the Protocols, which was established at a given moment to produce and train a world youth consisting exclusively of atheistic world proletarians, who would have no loyalty to their own country and national traditions and who would regard everything unfavourable to Jewish world conquest as despicable “anti-Semitism”.

“In place of the rulers of today we shall set up a bogey which will be called the Super Government Administration,” is prophesied in Protocol V.

[Page 228]

“Its hands will reach out in all directions like nippers and its organisation will be of such colossal dimensions that it cannot fail to subdue all the nations of the world.”

In the U.N.O., the Western democrat, the Eastern Soviet Jew, the New York rabbi and the Soviet commissar, sit today side by side in full cooperation. While Gentile soldiers are busy shedding each other’s blood, a war is carried on even inside U.N.O. itself, where the famous dictum of Theodor Herzl influences every peace declaration of the United Nations:

“We are one people. We are all the same people!”

And everything besides this is a farce, just a put-on show.

In the Atomic Energy Commission of U.N.O., Jews talk to Jews masked as either democrats or Bolsheviks, and discuss among themselves the most formidable problem of the world. Though the author of the United Nations Charter, Leon Pavlovsky, is an American Jew, he copied out the Soviet constitution word for word into the Charter of U.N.O. Information considered suitable for the Gentile nations must be passed down by the Information Centre run by a Jew, Jacob Sapiro. In the Atomic Energy Commission, Bernard Baruch represents the United States and in the Political Committee, D. J. Manuilsky, a Soviet Jew, represents Soviet Russia. The International Labour Organisation of U.N.O. is directed by David A. Morse, whose real name is Maskovich — a Russian Jew. Though the Secretary-General of this powerful world organisation is not a Jew, nevertheless, Benjamin Cohen, Assistant Secretary-General is one. It is also most remarkable that during the Korean War, Constantin Zinkovich, a Russian Jew, was chief of the Security Service of U.N.O. And this meant, in fact that he was the boss of General MacArthur during the Korean operations.

From now on, it will not be the American Congress that decides the fate of America, but an unknown organisation, controlled by Jews. Thus Turkish soldiers must die at the behest of Jews in the United Nations, and these very same Jews may sabotage those who are struggling against Bolshevism. And again, U.N.O. will dictate and tell France, Greece or Western Germany whom these countries may accept as citizens, whether they can receive loans, and what kind of labour regulations are to be adopted. We will deal with this in the next chapter.

[Page 229]

Let us see to what extent the instructions laid down in the Protocols have been carried out in both East and West. We will first deal with Bolshevism. From a comparison it is clear that it would be more accurate to regard the Protocols, rather than Lenin’s works, as the Bible of Bolshevism:

“The people under our guidance have annihilated the aristocracy… (says Protocol III, written in 1897) who were their one and only defence and foster-mother for the sake of their own advantage which is inseparably bound up with the well-being of the people. Nowadays, with the destruction of the aristocracy, the people have fallen into the grips of merciless money-grinding scoundrels who have laid a pitiless and cruel yoke upon the necks of the workers.”

But, in fact, much more than this was achieved by world Jewry in half a century. It succeeded in destroying not only the aristocracy based on birth, but that also based on ability, as well as the intellectual elite, regardless of whether it belonged to the working class, landed peasantry or to the “aristocracy” of the middle classes. The intellectual decapitation of Russia was completed after 1917, and instead of Dostoievsky and his class, people like Ilya Ehrenburg represent today the “intellectual elite” in Soviet Russia. Half of the European elite was executed, some under the pretext of liberation, and others because they were found guilty of war crimes. The people fell indeed into the “grips of scoundrels”.

Today, while this chapter is being written, one can take a look at what is happening in Russia and behind the Iron Curtain. Firstly, the kings were dethroned and their sceptres and crowns taken from them, next the aristocracy was destroyed, then the middle classes of the various countries were shot and buried in common graves on the pattern of the Katyn Wood murders or deported to slave labour or extermination camps, and now it is the turn of the workers’ leaders to suffer the same fate.

“What we have to get at is that there should be in all the States of the world, besides ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires devoted to our interests, police and soldiers.” (Protocols VII)

This aim has been completely achieved in the Soviet Union, and its achievement in the other countries behind the Iron Curtain is well on the way. The Jewish world kingdom has taken material shape in the form of Bolshevism, in which there is nothing to be found but enslaved masses and Jewish commissars.

[Page 230]

“In this way … we shall destroy among the Goyim the importance of the family and its educational value and remove the possibility of individual minds splitting off…” says Protocol X.

Jewish teachers in the schools of countries behind the Iron Curtain teach artificial insemination to thirteen-year-old children. In the people’s colleges, thirteen to fifteen-year-old boys and girls sleep together. In Soviet Russia family life is scattered, but not by deportation only. The railway workers or postman born in the Ukraine is sent for duty to Vladivostok and vice versa. The Soviet youth movements ruthlessly detach the children from the family circle.

The following quotation from authentic American reports proves that part of the programme of the Protocols has been accomplished in America as well:

“Juvenile delinquency is growing at an alarming rate in America today [1956]. The police cannot name a section of the criminal code with which American youth, girls and boys alike, would not be familiar. The murder of parents and of brothers and sisters as well as all sorts of sexual murders, robberies, hold-ups, bank robberies, common kidnappings and dope smuggling are not uncommon amongst juveniles. The picture reflected by the statistics is simply appalling,” (The Hidveroek, December, 1955, page 939.)

In Der Weg, Vol. VI. No. 8, we read that in an interview, J. Edgar Hoover, head of the F.B.I., gave even more shocking figures. There was a total of 1,790,030 cases of crime during 1951. The daily average of persons murdered or attacked was 301; of houses broken into, 1,129; of persons robbed, 146; and of motorcars stolen, 468.

Thus, in every five minutes, one murder, robbery or kidnapping took place. The most disturbing feature of the crime wave is that juveniles are so often involved. Almost daily one reads cases of fifteen-year-old boys, armed with revolvers, committing hold-ups and armed robberies. According to statistics, hundreds of thousands of young people carry guns. Today in America a criminal atmosphere appears to have been intentionally produced which is inhaled with every breath. This begins with children regularly reading lurid stories in the so-called picture comics [comic books]. More than a hundred of these gutter-publications produce over forty million copies. Ninety percent of the children in the six to eleven year age group read these horror-stories. Detective and crime stories flood the bookstalls in lots of 100,000 or more. Six hundred “authors” are working full time writing and producing them. Perhaps it is right to add that more than ninety percent of these “authors” are Jews.

[Page 231]

The artificially created criminal atmosphere is even more intensified by television, explains the article in Der Weg. Last year, according to the scripts, 16,932 violent deaths were to be seen on the luminous screens of television receivers — 9,652 persons were shot dead by revolvers and 762 more were mown by machine guns. Various investigations held in the high schools brought to light the fact that about half of the students under eighteen are habitual dope addicts; marihuana, heroin and morphia [morphine] were mentioned among the narcotics they take.

Since we know that the films, television, radio and Press in America are almost exclusively in the hands of Jewry, this crime wave can scarcely be regarded as accidental. The authors of the Protocols knew well that the stability of their rule depended upon the masses being rendered corrupt and characterless. The programme of the Protocols was accomplished:

“… the Goyim are bemused with alcoholic liquors; their youth has grown stupid.” (Protocol I.)

“In our programme one-third of our subjects will keep the rest under observation from a sense of duty, on the principle of volunteer service to the State. It will then be no disgrace to be a spy or informer, but a merit…” (Protocol XVII.)

Today in the offices, factories and workshops of the bolshevised countries, several hundreds of thousands of informers and agents of the regime compete in observing and reporting even the most unimportant matters. Protocol XI tells us:

“The Goyim are a flock of sheep and we are their wolves. And you know what happens when the wolves get hold of the flock…”

The lethargy of the masses and the terror induced in them proved to be important safeguards for the survival of the Bolshevik regime.

“Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control,” states Protocol XII, and today all censorship in countries behind the Iron Curtain and especially in Soviet Russia is one hundred percent in Jewish hands.

[Page 232]

“When we are in the period of the new regime transitional to that of our assumption of full sovereignty we must not admit any revelations by the Press of any form of public dishonesty; it is necessary that the new regime should be thought to have so perfectly contented everybody that even criminality has disappeared… cases of the manifestation of criminality should remain known only to their victims and to chance witnesses — no more.” (Protocol XII.)

Today behind the Iron Curtain, police news and crime reports are missing from the Press. The secret Jewish command in the Protocols was faithfully carried out by the “new regime” fifty years later.

“When we come into our kingdom it will be undesirable for us that there should exist any other religion than ours…”

the Learned Elders of Zion state in Protocol XIV. And it is said that in the Soviet Union today [1957] the Jewish faith alone enjoys religious freedom.

“… we shall make it our task to see that against us such things as plots shall no longer exist … we shall slay without mercy all who take arms (in hand) to oppose our coming into our kingdom. Every kind of new institution of anything like a secret society will also be punished with death…” (Protocol XV.)

This Jewish order was carried out with almost classical severity by the M.V.D., [Ministry of Internal Affairs] led by the Jews. The purges and massacres in Soviet Russia and in the countries behind the Iron Curtain prove that the Jews in power are carrying out the instructions of the Protocols ruthlessly.

“Every kind of new institution of anything like a secret society will also be punished with death; those of them which are now in existence, are known to us, serve us and have served us, we shall disband and send into exile to continents far removed from Europe. In this way we shall proceed with those Goy Masons who know too much.” (Protocol XV.)

This explains why freemasonry was liquidated in Eastern Europe after the establishment of Communism, despite the fact that it had paved the way for Bolshevism. Freemasons behind the Iron Curtain today live in a rather remote land — in Siberia in fact!

Protocol VIII and Protocol X tell us:

“For a time, until there will no longer be any risk in entrusting responsible posts in our States to our brother-Jews, we shall put them in the hands of persons who in case of disobedience … must face criminal charges.”

“… we shall arrange elections in favour of such presidents as have in their past some dark, undiscovered stain, some ‘Panama’ or other — then they will be trustworthy agents… out of fear of revelations…” (Protocol X.)

[Page 233]

This system was employed with ghastly thoroughness by Bolsheviks in the countries behind the Iron Curtain until their power was firmly established. It can be best illustrated by examples in Hungary.

Since 1945, the real holder of power in Hungary was a Muscovite Jew called Mátyás Rakosi-Roth. The first President of the Republic was Zoltan Tildy, an alcoholic Calvinist priest whose wife, Elizabeth Gyenis-Gruenfeld, is a Jewess. The second President was Árpád Szakasits, an informer for the Gestapo whose wife was sent to prison for shoplifting. The third President was a gypsy called Alexander Rónai-Roma who had a Jewish wife. But real power is always in the hands of the Hungarian secret police (A.V.H.) led by Jews.

“… it cannot be allowed that out of fear of a possible mistake an opportunity should be given of escape to persons suspected of a political lapse…” says Protocol XVIII, which goes on:

“… in these matters we shall be literally merciless … there is no possibility of excuse for persons occupying themselves with questions in which nobody except the government can understand anything …”

And indeed, in Central Europe most political prisoners are rotting in Soviet prisons, in the internment camps of the enslaved countries or in deportation colonies. Political “criminals” were punished by the enforcement of retroactive laws. According to the statistics of the American Federation of Labour (A.F.L.), fourteen to twenty million slaves are building the structure of the Jewish world kingdom in the forced labour camps of the Soviet. The Protocols even give a prescription as to how political prisoners must be treated in order to prevent people feeling sympathy for them:

“In order to destroy the prestige of heroism for political crime we shall send it for trial in the category of thieving, murder, and every kind of abominable and filthy crime. Public opinion will then confuse in its conception this category of crime with the disgrace attaching to every other and will brand it with the same contempt.” (Protocol XIX.)

[Page 234]

Anybody closely watching political trials behind the Iron Curtain would realise that here too the leaders of the Soviet Union are following the fifty-year-old instructions of the Protocols. Thus, under duress [torture],  Cardinal Mindszenty was made to confess that he had dealt in currency smuggling; Bishop Lajos Ordass was forced to admit smuggling dollars, and László Rajk, an ex-Communist minister for home affairs, had to plead guilty to larceny. All those who do not like Jewish rule coated with Bolshevism are enemies of the people. They “commit crimes” against one race, i.e., against Jewry.

The authors of the Protocols are thinking not only of the present but of the future also. They want to secure world power forever, and the only possible way to achieve this is to blot out the historical past from the minds of the youth of all nations. Then these young people will grow up to swell the ranks of the servile masses, bereft of any tradition.

“Classicism, as also any form of study of ancient history, in which there are more bad than good examples, we shall replace with the study of the programme of the future,” we read in Protocol XVI.

Marxism and Leninism also teaches that:

“We will obliterate from the memory of Man all the historical facts of past centuries which could be unfavourable to us. We will abolish all private schools and private education.”

All this programme has been carried out behind the Iron Curtain with extreme precision, the above quoted instructions being followed word for word. The classics are no longer being taught in Soviet schools. The youngsters have to learn the doctrines of Marx and Lenin, together with details of the various five-year plans and of programmes relating to the future. All private teaching is abolished. The Latin language is banned and replaced by Russian. The besmirching of the past and the falsification of history is being carried out systematically. Jewish world rule, pulverising and rotting everything, can here be seen in its absolute form — in Bolshevism.

Jewish propaganda has recently suggested that “anti-Semitism” exists behind the Iron Curtain. The show trials of a few Communist Jews would appear to corroborate this argument, e.g. the cases of Slansky-Salzman, Anna Pauker-Rabinovich, Gábor Péter-Auspitz and the execution of Beria.

“… we have sacrificed many of our own but for that we have now already given them such a position on the earth as they could not even have dreamed of. The comparatively small numbers of the victims from the number of ours have preserved our nationality from destruction.” (Protocol XV.)

[Page 235]

This explains away the so-called “anti-Semitism” of Soviet Russia. The bodies of Pauker, Beria and Slansky appear to be rungs in the ladder leading upwards to world power.

What hopes have you got for the future, you men of the West, living in “free” lands, bombarded as you are by empty phrases proceeding from the lips of Jew-run statesmen and leaders? Can you not see that your much extolled democracy is really no democracy, but Judeocracy? In the East it is the tommy-gun, in the West it is gold coupled with political influence. Have you any hope, you men of the West, of escaping the fate of your Christian brothers and sisters in the East, whom you have deserted? Perhaps those who are promising you better things are really referring to you amongst themselves in the words of the Protocols:

“The Goyims are a flock of sheep, and we are their wolves.”

How much of the programme of the Protocols has been carried out in America up to the present time?

When Roosevelt broke off diplomatic relations with Germany on account of “the persecution of the Jews”, it became clear that the United States of America were by this time in the hands of the secret Jewish government. The Quebec Conference as well as the adoption of the Morgenthau Plan proved that power over America had passed almost completely into the hands of Jewry. The aerial bombings of the Second World War, the revenge campaign of Nuremberg and the Soviet alliance, all reflected an America which retained few of the traditions of the past.

“The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the public, with strict regard for their capacities for servile obedience, will not be persons trained in the arts of government, and will therefore easily become pawns in our game in the hands of men of learning and genius who will be their advisers, specialists bred and reared from early childhood to rule the affairs of the whole world.” (Protocol II.)

F. D. Roosevelt was such a pawn. As we pointed out before, the number of Jews amongst Roosevelt’s seventy-two (72) presidential advisers was fifty-two (52).

[Page 236]

The formula of gradual subversion and the scientifically planned destructive disintegration which has been applied in the case of the U.S. is prescribed by the Protocols:

“This evil is the one and only means to attain the end, the good. Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of our end. In politics one must know how to seize the property of others without hesitation if by it we secure submission and sovereignty.” (Protocol I.)

In this connection, in order not to offend America, it is enough to quote an article entitled “Return to Paganism”, which appeared in the American Catholic paper The Wanderer, on July 23rd, 1950:

“The citizens of this country had to witness throughout the past years a shameful theatrical play in which the leading members of our Government, both in foreign and home affairs, were exposed as Communists and traitors. Others were found guilty of perjury, and some of larceny, blackmail and forgery. Reliable observers think, that according to the most modest estimate, there are at least 5,000 homosexuals employed in the State administration in Washington, and that amongst the heads of departments of the administration not a single person is to be found willing to try to put things right and clean up this mess in our public life.”

The Protocols describe this state of affairs fairly accurately:

“If already now we have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the Goy communities … if already now there is not a single State where there exists for us any barriers to admittance into what Goy stupidity calls State secrets: what will our position be, then, when we shall be acknowledged supreme lords of the world in the person of our king of all the world?” (Protocol XII.)

The American spy scandals, the giving away of the secret of the atomic bomb, the passing on of confidential matter from the State Department and the stealing of military secrets, all show that Jewry was following out instructions from the Protocols since, as we have already pointed out, these crimes were committed almost exclusively by Jews.

Simultaneously, with the corruption of the American upper classes and State administration, the demoralisation of the masses began through their entertainments. The ignorance of the American masses concerning public affairs is not natural to the American character. This result has been artificially achieved and corresponds with the commandments of the Protocols:

[Page 237]

“In order that the masses themselves may not guess what they are about we further distract them with amusements, games, pastimes, passions, people’s palaces… Soon we shall begin through the Press to propose competitions in art, in sport of all kinds…” (Protocol XIII)

American films are produced today by Louis B. Mayer, Jack Warner, Harry Warner, Nicholas Schenck, Joseph M. Schenck, Samuel Goldwyn, Adolph Zukor and other film kings of similar names. Amongst the leading film stars there are more than one hundred Reds and Communists. Eighty-five percent of the Press is controlled by Jews. These same elements also cater for the masses on radio and television. And so refrigerators are more important today than the manufacture of weapons to defend the “free” world.

“Growing more and more disaccustomed to reflect and form any opinions of their own, people will begin to talk in the same tone as we, because we alone shall be offering them new directions for thought… of course, through such persons as will not be suspected of solidarity with us.” (Protocol XIII.)

All this has happened. Today, the Press, the radio, the films and television divert public attention from vital national and international problems. The gigantic network of the entertainment industry represents not only the “sunny side of life”, but remains at the same time the most formidable weapon for the destructive ambitions of a certain race.

Not a word is uttered by the Press against this state of affairs. The very emphasis of the word “freedom” is often nothing else but hypocrisy, or perhaps an excuse for Jewry to do as it pleases. It is enough to read Dorothy Thompson’s article, in which she admits that she was unable to find an editor willing to give space in his paper to her serial condemning the hatred artificially created in order to wage war. The freedom of the Press is either dead or is turned into a monopoly, and only things favourable to Jewish interests are published. This state of affairs was also prescribed by the authors of the Protocols:

“And if there should be any found who are desirous of writing against us, they will not find any person eager to print their productions.” (Protocol XII.)

Those American papers which understand the Jewish questions are kept going only by private donations. Their circulation is small and their influence is negligible. The truth that they champion and preach cannot reach the great reading public.

[Page 238]

“We have got our heads into the administration of the law, into the conduct of elections, into the Press, into liberty of the person, but principally into education and training as being the cornerstones of a free existence.” (Protocol IX.)

The notorious Felix Frankfurter is today [1957] one of the judges of the American Supreme Court. In his book, The International Jew, Henry Ford raised objections many years ago to the Judaisation of the administration of justice. Today in New York courts of justice, Jews make up the majority of the judges. Justice is no longer blindfolded; she looks out carefully so as to recognise and favour the world-conquering race. As at Nuremberg, Jewish nationalism administers the kind of justice that favours Jewish nationalists.

It is well known that public education is in the hands of Jewry. Various “educational” organisations, leagues and associations supply young people with obscure and misleading socialistic ideas. The American Liberty League, under the direction of Robert Filene, the well-known Jewish multi-millionaire of Boston, is the largest of these organisations. As Flynn writes in his book, The Road Ahead, it came to light that between sixty and seventy professors of Chicago and Harvard Universities were active members of the Communist Party. One of these professors belonged to fourteen Bolshevik front organisations. In several colleges the teachers and professors were all Jews. The result is that the next generation is being brought up on Bolshevistic ideas leading to moral depravity.

“We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the Goyim by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be false…” (Protocol IX.)

And the lurid game which consumed and plunged into poverty and servitude the people of Eastern Europe is being played out in America also.

“We shall raise the rate of wages, which, however, will not bring any advantage to the workers for, at the same time, we shall produce a rise in prices of the first necessaries of life…” (Protocol VI.)

Although the great wealth of the soil raised the living standards of American workers to fabulous heights, the end of this economic game is always the same. During the heyday of armament production wages rose, but the price of everything else went up, too. The dollar lost half of its purchasing power during the armament boom.

[Page 239]

“What we have to get at is that there should be in all the States of the world, besides ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires devoted to our interests, police and soldiers.” (Protocol VII.)

Today, the American worker still possesses his own house, his motorcar and refrigerator, and yet by means of the sham fight between capital and labour, the Jews are leading him inexorably towards Bolshevism.

The Christian sects have also become embroiled in a war of nerves. The principle of “Free State Religion” weakens the Christian Churches.

The Jewish rabbis protest against having Christian songs in the schools at Christmas time.

“When we come into our kingdom it will be undesirable for us that there should exist any other religion than ours… We must therefore sweep away all other forms of belief.” (Protocol XIV.)

The theory of “The Kingdom of God”, which we dealt with in the earlier part of this book, is a very effective way of inducing a sham Christianity [in 2014 called Christian Zionists] with a Jewish and Bolshevik [Marxist] twist. Moreover, in the background of the various sects the same mysterious power is found which is referred to by the Protocols and known as Freemasonry.

“Meanwhile, however, until we come into our kingdom … we shall create and multiply Freemasonic lodges in all the countries of the world, absorb into them all who may become or who are prominent in public activity, for in these lodges we shall find our principal intelligence office and means of influence. All these lodges we shall bring under one central administration, known to us alone and to all others absolutely unknown, which will be composed of our learned elders.” (Protocol XV.)

B’nai B’rith, the largest Jewish free-masonic organisation, has today [1957] 267 lodges under a central direction. This alone secures more influence for Jewry than all other similar organisations put together.

Protocol XV, amongst many other things, tells us:

[Page 240]

“In these lodges we shall tie together the knot which binds together all revolutionary and liberal elements. Their composition will be made up of all strata of society. The most secret political plots will be known to us and will fall under our guiding hands on the very day of their conception… It is natural that we and no other should lead Masonic activities, for we know whither we are leading, we know the final goal of every form of activity whereas the Goyim have knowledge of nothing, not even of the immediate effect of action.”

In America all this has been happening for a long while. Freemasonry is the real governor of American democracy and constitutes a most powerful and obedient auxiliary in the cause of Jewish “Nazism”. It is an invisible S.S., recruited from leaders of all nations and from members of all social classes. It played a leading role in the French Revolution, in the first Hungarian Bolshevik dictatorship of Bela Kun, in starting the anti-clerical and anti-religious movements and in the elaboration of the Versailles Treaties after the First World War. As a consequence of all these things, both freemasonry and its subsidiaries, the Rotary Clubs, were condemned by the Pope.

One thing is certain. Freemasonry is the very negation of democracy. When leadership is exerted by a secret organisation and when laws are conceived and elaborated in the lodges before being submitted to Parliament, there can be no talk of the expression of the will of the people. Under these circumstances democracy becomes a shadow. When a State is guided by Freemasonry, which is controlled by Jews, its democracy represents nothing else but a stage in a rapid descent towards Bolshevism.

The great Hungarian patriot László Endre, a high authority on the Jewish question in Europe, shortly before the outbreak of the Second World War wrote a most interesting book about the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, whose authenticity he establishes by diligent study and research. Is it any wonder, then, that in 1946 he was among the first to be dragged to the gallows in bolshevised Budapest? This man who endured martyrdom for his ideals, wrote a farewell letter during the night before his execution. In this letter, dated March 21st 1946, be states:

“The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are true … the means to establish a world kingdom are in their hands and they will destroy everything that might constitute an obstacle to their formation of the new World State. Everything happening here is for the sake of prevention as well as revenge, and of course has nothing to do with the administration of justice. For Jewish policy is to exterminate not only those who did something but even those who might yet do something or could have done something…”

[Page 241]

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are true. The reason for accepting their authenticity is not because a Hungarian martyr thought them to be true, but because everything written in them has so far come true. Can a better test of veracity be found?

[Page 242]

[NOTE: Louis Marschalko was a Christian and as such his book reflects that. The purpose of posting his work is not to endorse his religious views but rather to present his study on the jews and their supremacist agenda of world conquest – KATANA]

The World

Conquerors

The Real War Criminals

by

Louis Marschalko

Part 15

Amazon Reviews

amazon.com

http://www.amazon.com/The-World-Conquerors-Louis-Marschalko/

9 of 14 people found the following review helpful

5 What a tremendous aid in understanding world events today.

By timothy k. price on December 25, 2013

This is a book that has to be read. Some people will protest and call it “anti-simetic” but this is not true.

A large tribe of people will deluge this site with protests against the book. Pay no attention to them. Read this book.

Showing 1 of 1 comments

Latimer the Cat 1 year ago

“What a tremendous aid in understanding world events today.”

Of course. Like it or not, today is a reflection of yesterday. Isn’t that why revisionist (real) history publishing was banned under the post 1917 judaic/communist incursion of Russia? Isn’t that why the other side of the coin (the NSDAP view) of what’s taught as WWII is never taught here in America even after 70+ years after the conflict?

8 of 12 people found the following review helpful

5 Must read

By john bebekon March 2, 2013

One of the most informative books I have read.If you want a unsanatised version of events, then this is the book.

Louis Marschalko tell’s it like it happened,and is still happening today.

11 of 14 people found the following review helpful

5 Truth Before It’s Time

By john thames “scholar1” on February 25, 2013

Long before the Holocaust denying Institute for Historical Review appeared on the scene, Louis Marschalko, a Hungarian, wrote a definitive expose of the six million myth in the context of a book exposing world-wide Jewish conspiracy. Remember, the book was published in English in the late 1950’s and got everything right long before its time. Although there are a few mangled quotations and slight errors of fact, Marschalko saw through the fog of propganda long before organized revisionism appeared on the scene. It is a remarkable book – and one still worth reading if you can find it.

19 of 23 people found the following review helpful

5 The Clearness of Marschalko.

By Paul Wasa on May 12, 2010

Mr. Marschalko does a good job in exposing the poisoning mind of the Jews worldwide.

He’s very well documented and has a very clear insight on things gone by. He analyzes the 2nd World War regarding the Jews and draws the most logical conclusions.

A book not only worth of being read, but I should say “a must” for younger people, who know nothing about WWII but from Jewish books and Jewish propaganda films, most of them untrue or biassed.

Paul Wasa.

Honest Critic 4 months ago

agreed… good read… goes hand in hand with a Greater Miracle of the Lost Ten Tribes Discovered and Fearless and Godly Pioneers for the Truth (which also gives a short bio. on Marshalko)… read it before you dismiss it.

31 of 34 people found the following review helpful

4 Controversial, but interesting

By S. Swink on August 27, 2007

Louis Marschalko — a Hungarian nationalist – published this book book in 1958. “The World Conquerors,” surveys the worldwide advance of communism from a decidedly Catholic perspective. The author’s argument is that communism is a worldwide movement, promoted everywhere by the same worldwide, transnational force.

In four chapters relating to WWII, “The Real Victors of the Second World War”, “Revenge is Ours”, “New Purim and Nuremberg”, and “What Has Become of Six Million Jews?”, Marschalko proves himself a one-man Institute for Historical Review.

Good Morning from the Zundelsite

Copyright (c) 1997 – Ingrid A. Rimland

September 23, 1997

In a book review published with permission from Granata Communications, below I give you yet another excellent summary of a classic:

Louis Marschalko’s book, “The World Conquerors,” first published in 1958, is more timely now than ever. It is one of those volumes whose prophesies lies in fulfillment.

Written by a Hungarian nationalist, it surveys the worldwide advance of communism as the unfolding of the scheme of the notorious “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”.

The book’s thesis is expounded in its first chapter. Entitled “The Oldest Nazism in the World”, Marschalko shows the bolshevism of the Old Testament. The Fuehrership of Moses laid the foundation for all that has come since.

Although not a study of organized religion, the author’s side comments show astounding clarity. The Catholic perspective of Mr. Marschalko underlies his opposition to “The World Conquerors” he exposes: Christianity as the antithesis of Judaism, Protestantism as a reversion to the barbarism of the Old Testament, the ancient worship of the Golden Calf as the basis for emerging capitalism.

The rest of the book piles fact upon fact to make its case. The Jewish background of communism is thoroughly explored. Much of the material is familiar. However, a very valuable survey of communism in South America is included. This reinforces the author’s argument that communism is a worldwide movement, promoted everywhere by the same worldwide, transnational force.

Moving on, Marschalko examines the real nature of the German National Socialist regime. Its achievements are noted, as well as the real reasons for the war. Hitler’s Germany had to be destroyed if the program of the “Protocols” were to be fulfilled.

The author provides much information on the persecution of the Germans in Poland at the time when such claims were almost universally dismissed as propaganda.

The section on World War II and its aftermath is astounding Revisionism ahead of its time. In four chapters, “The Real Victors of the Second World War”, “Revenge is Ours”, “New Purim and Nuremberg”, and “What Has Become of Six Million Jews?”, Marschalko proves himself a one-man Institute for Historical Review.

The Jewish staffing and orchestration of the Nuremberg Trial, the east-west collaboration in the hounding of “war criminals”, the real fate of the fabled Six Million, the setting up of Jewish persecution as the moral standard of the post war era, all are devastatingly analyzed to show the vested interests at work.

Even the well-informed reader will be amazed at the cohesion and extent of the Jewish revenge which was taken post-1945 in Europe. Each of these chapters can and should be expanded into full length books. Until that happens, these four chapters may be taken as a primer on the subject.

The rest of the book covers the post war era of the Cold War up to the date of publication, 1958. The Jewish involvement in the atomic bomb treason, the Hungarian uprising of 1956 and the efforts of the Jewish media to cover up anti-communist exposures by Senator Joseph McCarthy and others confirm the blackout on truth by “The World Conquerors”.

Particularly valuable is the voluminous evidence presented on the post-war Jewish control of the Soviet Union. Marschalko convincingly argues that the deportation of Western Russia’s Jews ahead of the Nazi invasion created a second Iron Curtain. The Jews were concentrated in the Soviet arms production factories behind the Ural Mountains. This allowed them to retain a key grip on power while denuding the western provinces where Jews were never popular.

The United Nations is also exposed as a front for Jews. A voluminous list of Jews in key positions is appended. In reviewing the evidence, it is difficult to conclude anything other than that the shoe fits.

If there is no Jewish conspiracy at work, the world has been treated to amazing coincidence. A better explanation is that Louis Marschalko is right. His presentation is logically lucid and well documented. It is also easily read and easily understood. A short book of only 296 pages, it is hardly all-inclusive. But as a statement of the essential facts, it has stood the test of time. It summarizes the facts and points the student in the proper direction for further research.

(Copyright 1958, reprinted 1983. Translated from the Hungarian by A. Suranyi. No Library of Congress #. No ISBN.)

Thought for the Day:

“There are persons, too, who see not the full extent of the evil which threatens them; they solace themselves with hopes that the enemy, if he succeed, will be merciful.”

“It is the madness of folly, to expect mercy from those who have refused to do justice; and even mercy, where conquest is the object, is only a trick of war; the cunning of the fox is as murderous as the violence of the wolf, and we ought to guard equally against both.”

(Thomas Paine)

The World

Conquerors

The Real War Criminals

by

Louis Marschalko

1958

English translation by A. Suranyi

Publisher: Britons Publishing Society, London

CONTENTS

CHAPTER

Introduction

1. The oldest “Nazism” in the World

2. The Meaning of Christ’s Resistance

3. World Domination in Three Stages

4. Millionaire Bankers Back Bolshevism

5. A Movement Maligned

6. The Real War Criminals

7. Why Hitler Had to Go

8. The Real Victors of the Second World War

9. “Revenge is Ours”.

10. New Purim and Nuremberg

11. What Has Become of Six Million Jews?

12. Spiritual and Economic Persecution

13. Biological Class-warfare Against All Nations

14. The Jews Have the Atom Bomb

15. The Betrayal of America

16. The Fulfilment of the Protocols and the Farewell Letter of a Hungarian Martyr

17. The Key Positions of Jewish World-Power

18. Secret Powers

19. The Hungarian Freedom Revolt

Epilogue

Dedication

To the memory of the Nationalist Martyrs

and victims of Bolshevism

About the Author

Louis Marschalkó

http: //en.metapedia.org/wiki/LouisMarschalko

Louis Marschalko (September 11, 1903 — May 20, 1968) was a Hungarian nationalist writer and author of The World Conquerors (1958).

His father was a secondary school teacher, his mother a musician.

He started to work for nationalistic newspapers. He lived in Debrecen until 1936, when he moved to Budapest. He wrote the booklet Who Betrayed Hungary in 1918-19. The booklet was banned after 1945, as anti-judaic and anti-semitic, even though the author had no influence to the fact that over 90% of the betrayers and Bolsheviks were Jews. He opened the eyes of the Hungarian readers with that book, since only few knew, that most the betrayers were Jews. Jews in Europe generally hide their Jewishness in the public.

He did not come home 1945, but had to remain in Munich, since otherwise the Bolshevists for sure had killed him. He wanted to emigrate to the USA, but having spent some months on Ellis Island in New York, the American immigration authorities refused his immigration application due to Jewish influences. He returned to Munich and worked as a simple worker, and wrote his books and articles at night.

Since Jews (Martin Himler and others) who betrayed Hungary and caused lot of suffering in Hungary, appeared after the Second World War in Europe as American officers in CIC uniforms, and gathered East-European patriots and delivered them to sure death under the Bolshevistic regime of their race-companions, wrote some scandalous smear books about Hungary and Hungarians, he wrote about the role of Jews in Hungary and in the world. (Conquestors of the Country, Conquestors of the World). He was also co-author of the book “Accusing Gallows” that described the tragic destiny of the last legal Hungarian administration. His book “Conquestors of the World” was published three times in the USA, but he did not receive any royalties.

He died in Munich, 1968. On his grave there are the words:

“For God, our country and freedom, forever”.

[Inside dustcover]

The Second World War was said to have been waged for “the rights of small nations,” but the author, like countless other Hungarians, is literally “on the run from Communism.” He has been living in exile since 1945 because of his anti-communist views, Although he was never a member of any party, the Communist regime of Hungary, with typical effrontery, demanded that the U.S.A. authorities “hand Louis Marschalko over as a war criminal.” A former special correspondent of two leading newspapers in pre-Communist Hungary, Marshalko is a brilliant novelist, playwright and poet and has many hundreds of articles to his credit. World Conquerors expresses some of the bitterness and contempt of millions of enslaved Europeans for the rulers of the “victorious nations.” It shows that by being urged to throw off the German yoke, the central European nations were tricked into becoming satellites of the Soviet.

World Conquerors indicts the real war criminals. It gives horrifying glimpses of the agony behind the Iron Curtain and describes the plot to extend the slave system to the Western world. Thousands of copies of the Hungarian edition have been sold and this English translation is published to warn the West. It is written by one who is a firm friend of the English-speaking people but an implacable foe of their vacillating and corrupt governments.

Chapter Fifteen

The Betrayal of America 

In finally betraying America, world Jewry definitely removed its mask. Jewry may perhaps feel it has a grievance against every country in the world. The United States, however, gave everything to the Jews a country can offer — money, business, wealth, security, a peaceful life, an unrestricted liberty which was turned into unbridled wantonness and even political influence. America went into battle twice, sacrificing her sons for the sake of the business interests, the profiteering and the political influence of Jewish nationalism; for these were the forces that pushed her into both world wars. America defeated Hitler and also gave eleven billion dollars to the Soviet Union to help liberate the Jewish inmates of the concentration camps. She took her share of the odium resulting from the Nuremberg Trials and from dancing attendance on Jewry’s desire for revenge.

It look Jewry hardly seventy years to acquire and control the major part of American business and financial life. The destitute little Jew who had fled from Russian pogroms basked in the sunny side of life in the U.S.A., enjoying civic rights and many privileges. During Roosevelt’s Presidency, he occupied key positions in political life. He became the owner of an earthly paradise — of much of the riches and wealth of Miami, Florida and California. For him the Promised Land was not Palestine, but the United States of America.

Palestine, or Israel as it is called today, was re-established for the sole purpose of receiving those undesirable types of destitute and cadging Jews who scare New York millionaires, because they carry with them everywhere the germs of “anti-Semitism”.

During Roosevelt’s administration America became a land of the Jews. Thus one would expect the world conquerors to remain faithful to America of all countries, and not to turn against the United States when the time came for her to fight against Communism. But the Jews have shown in the case of America also that they feel themselves safe only as long as they are rulers and they will be faithful to a country only as long as the interests of that country are identical with their own.

[Page 205]

In the absence of knowledge of the Jewish question, America might indeed have had the right to expect that world Jewry would take her side in the cold war which followed after the Second World War. But exactly the opposite happened. Somewhere behind the veiled privacy of B’nai B’rith lodges the fate of the United States was decided by world Jewry. Surely America’s Gentile politicians, though in Jewish hands, did not want to win the Second World War for Jewry alone, to the exclusion of everybody else. Perhaps, with the exception of Roosevelt, they never believed in the possibility of a lasting agreement with the Soviet Union. Senator Truman, who succeeded Roosevelt, said on June 21st, 1941, the day of the outbreak of war between Germany and Soviet Russia:

“If we see that Germany is going to win we will help Soviet Russia, but if it is the other way round, we will have to help Germany. Let’s leave them alone so that they will weaken each other as much as possible.”

Friendship with the Soviet was not in the interests of the U.S., any more than was the cold war after 1945. Both of these things served the interests of world Jewry alone and nobody else. World Jewry’s interests played a decisive part in the unleashing of both world wars. But a third world war to defeat and liquidate the Soviet and to liberate the enslaved nations is not in the interests of the Jews. On the contrary, at Yalta and Potsdam world power was parcelled out between them.

As the Protocols tell us:

“It is from us that the all-engulfing terror proceeds.”

According to the well-known catch phrase America is the “land of freedom”, and in the estuary of the River Hudson the Statue of Liberty holds high the symbolic torch. But in reality an “all-engulfing terror” has reigned beyond Ellis Island since the time of Roosevelt’s accession to the Presidency. Felix Frankfurter, one of the judges of the Supreme Court of the U.S., said that;

“the real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes”.

The American citizen has the right to vote either for the Republican or Democratic Party, but those behind the scenes know very well that real power remains in their hands whichever party wins the election. Anybody daring to rebel, to protest or to utter a single enlightening word concerning this hidden hand will be either killed, gagged, driven into suicide or publicly “smeared”.

[Page 206]

Gerald K. Smith, the courageous leader of the American Christian Crusade, gives in his book an appalling account of the terror provoked by this hidden hand as well as of those patriotic Americans who fell victims to the world conquerors’ “all-engulfing terror”. We give here an abridged account taken from his book Suicide of how the powers behind the scenes exterminated those Americans who stood in the way of Bolshevism and of a second world war, and consequently opposed the aspirations of the world conquerors.

The reputation of James Forrestal, Secretary ofWar in Truman’s administration, was ruined by Drew Pearson and Walter Winchell (Lipsitz), the two radio commentators, exponents of the Jewish “M.V. D.” and of the Anti-Defamation League. They made Forrestal’s position impossible by stamping him as an “anti-Semite” for opposing U.S. foreign policy in the question of Palestine. Forrestal, after having publicly announced on one occasion that “these Jews will ruin America”, was detained in a hospital, and later mysteriously met his death one morning by “falling” from sixteenth floor window. Joseph Kennedy, the U.S. Ambassador to Great Britain, had to endure being silenced coupled with a kind local internment in Florida, because on his return home to America before the outbreak of the Second World War he declared:

“Only over my dead body will this country go to war.”

Kennedy’s successor, John Winant, after becoming familiar with the circumstances which falsely served to embroil America in the Second World War, was left with the choice of ignominious silence or suicide. This honest American diplomat chose suicide. Henry Wallace, who was a member of an odd Oriental sect and believed that with the help of some wildeat serum he would live 150 years, became Roosevelt’s Vice-President. But when he turned out to be difficult and not amenable to the powers behind the scenes, he died quite suddenly and quite young. General Patrick J. Hurley said in 1947, that;

“there are still several thousand Communists sitting in the State Department”.

For this, he was silenced by the mysterious Black Hand of Washington which drove him into exile — disgraced.

[Page 207]

The wife of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek, the daughter of Sun Yat-sen, lived in mortal fear whenever she visited America during the Second World War, because she knew that secret agents of the world conquerors’ “Gestapo” were planning her assassination. It came to light that the speech delivered by Edward Stettinius, Secretary of State, at the opening of the United Nations, was actually written by a Hollywood Communist film star called Dalton Trumbo. Morton Kent killed himself by cutting open a vein. He knew who stole very secret files for the Soviet Union. He knew well that it would make little difference whether he spoke or remained silent; he would be murdered in any case.

Whittaker Chambers, Louis Budenz and Tyler Kent still live, but in some danger of their lives. Budenz, who previously was one of the leading members of the Communist Party and who exposed several Jewish Communists, sought refuge in the Catholic University of Fordham. Should he step out of the protecting walls of the university buildings he would not live twenty-four hours. The same can be said of the other non-Jewish ex-Communist leader, Chambers, who exposed Alger Hiss.

Tyler Kent, who decoded the secret telegrams exchanged between Roosevelt and Churchill — some sent before Churchill was Prime Minister — and thus became one of the most important witnesses of how the world had been driven into war, was jailed for five years in Great Britain, on the Isle of Wight.

That benign and correct old gentleman, General Vaughan, had been kept busy removing Jews and Communists from the State Department in considerable numbers. He took a firm stand against David K. Niles, who was the “eminence grise” [a person who exercises power or influence in certain areas without holding an official position] of the White House during the administrations of Roosevelt and Truman. In his younger days Niles had been convicted and sentenced in Boston to several years’ imprisonment for sexual offences. Later he wrote speeches for American Presidents. General Vaughan had strong objections to letting such a Lombroso-type of character live in the entourage of the President of the United States. However, he was silenced, removed from office, and socially ruined under the pretext of “anti-Semitism”.

[Page 208]

General Frederick E. Morgan, U.N.R.R.A. chief in the American Zone of occupied Germany, was an Englishman by birth, who took the liberty to state in writing that the Jews living in Germany were well provided with both money and food, and thus suffered no need whatever. On the demand of Herbert H. Lehman, Senator for New York and head of U.N.R.R.A. at that time, General F. Morgan was removed from his post, despite the fact that at first the British government did not wish to give way to the pressure of American Jewry.

Mr. Earle, U.S. Ambassador to Bulgaria, was similarly silenced. He had been handed a secret memorandum by Von Papen in Sofia, in which Hitler’s Government made an offer to keep the United States out of the war. After passing on this memorandum to Roosevelt, Earle was recalled to Washington, then called up for military service and sent out to a Pacific island for the rest of the war. The American people were under no circumstances to be allowed to learn that the hated “Nazis” wished for peace with the United States.

The murder of Huey Pierce Long, Senator of Louisiana, was a most mysterious case. Long was one of Roosevelt’s rivals with the best possible chances of being elected as President of the U.S. He alleged in the course of a speech to the Senate on August 9th, 1935, that the American “Black Hand”, led by Jews, had ordered his assassination during a meeting in a New Orleans hotel. The Senate laughed off the old fighter at the time. But a month later he was shot dead by a Jew named Carl Austin Weiss.

According to Gerald K. Smith’s book, a good many of Roosevelt’s opponents perished under similarly mysterious circumstances. Amongst these were Senator Bronson M. Cutting of New Mexico, Senator Thomas D. Schall, of Minnesota, and John Andrew Simpson, president of the Farmers’ Union of Oklahoma.

Keep silent or die! — this was likewise the order to Admiral Husband E. Kimmel, who knew the real story of Pearl Harbour. And the Admiral remained silent, unwilling to risk his life.

William Albert Wirt, a university professor of Gary, Indiana, apparently as the result of a mistake, received an invitation to a very exclusive social gathering where he heard explained plans and preparations of the Jews and Communists to take over power in the United States. He reported what he had heard to the Press and was consequently summoned to one of the “anti-American activities committees” of the Senate, presided over by Senator O’Connor. The committee stamped Wirt as a liar. Wirt died not long after these hearings in the most suspicious circumstances. But on the first anniversary of Wirt’s death, Senator O’Connor visited the grave of this victim and prayed for forgiveness.

[Page 209]

Gerald Lyman Kenneth Smith, the leader of the American anti-Jewish movement, was once poisoned with arsenic, and the doctors only saved his life with difficulty. This same Gerald K. Smith writes that Gerhard Eisler, a Communist German Jew who emigrated to America and then, having been branded an important Stalin agent, escaped from the American authorities to the Soviet Zone of Germany, ordered the assassination of several thousand American citizens. Westbrook Pegler, one of the best-known American publicists, lived in permanent fear for his life. Those papers in which Pegler’s articles are published exposing the subversive activities of the Communists (Jews) are consistently threatened by Jewry with boycott and terror.

The story of Charles Lindbergh, the valiant pilot who flew the Atlantic, is now well known. Lindbergh opposed the war, and in the course of one of his speeches delivered in Des Moines, Iowa, he pronounced the word “Jew” in a not very flattering tone of voice. Such an intense campaign immediately started for his moral destruction that even today in circles of the Anti-Defamation League, the mention of “Lindbergh-treatment” conveys the assassination of a person’s character, career and social position. These circles know very well that the elimination of Lindbergh from public life was the work of Jewry. Martin Dies was silenced also by methods similar to the Lindbergh-treatment, because he was the first to try to drag Communists before the Senate and so into the spotlight of publicity. There were attempts to kidnap his son, and his wife was constantly threatened. Eleanor Roosevelt and her friends attended the sittings of the Senate Committee to poke fun at its chairman. The Press received confidential instructions to boycott the work of the committee. Yet though Dies was silenced, his committee’s work was carried on by Senator Joseph McCarthy on whom world Jewry’s anathema was declared and who may also be murdered at any time. [Since the publication of Gerald K. Smith’s book, Senator McCarthy has died in the most mysterious and suspicious circumstances. Several American papers hinted openly that he was murdered. — AUTHOR.]

[Page 210]

This was also the fate of the Canadian M.P. Norman Jacques, one of the most popular Members of the Canadian Parliament. Before his death he wrote to several of his acquaintances that:

“In my next speech in parliament I am going to open the eyes of my audience and I intend to expose the whole Jewish nationalist conspiracy.”

But before he could deliver his speech he died from “heart failure”.

Gerald K. Smith points out that the death of Franklin D. Roosevelt is itself a great mystery. It appears almost certain that Roosevelt did not die a natural death. According to some versions be suffered from having a guilty conscience because of Pearl Harbour, or because of that far-fetched Soviet friendship which resulted in a promise to hand over to the Soviet five million people consisting of Germans, Italians, Hungarians, Rumanians and Bulgarians. According to another theory, he wished to be proclaimed President of the World Republic, simultaneously with the establishment of U.N.O., but was forced to realise that the state of his health made him unfit for this office.

Only a single photograph remains to posterity showing the President of the U.S.A. Republic in his coffin. In this photograph a white flower can be seen covering a wound on Roosevelt’s head. And when his son Jimmy Roosevelt arrived for the funeral, his mother and family did not dare to open up the coffin so that he might see his father for the last time.

All these facts and events clearly prove that Felix Frankfurter is right. Actual power in America does not rest with the visible Government but is in the possession of individuals behind the scenes. They are the people representing supranational “Nazism”, whose interests were so well served by the Second World War, but whose interests would not be served by a third world war in which the sword of America would rip open the Iron Curtain. What would happen if the Soviet prisons were opened, or if the American soldiers saw the same things in the liberated territories that were seen after 1941 in Soviet Russia by the warriors of Europe? What would happen when the political prisoners were freed together with the slaves of the internment and forced labour camps? Would they not all tell the world who the real jailers, torturers, executioners and usurers of the Soviet regime were? Has not Lenin himself said that “anti-Semitism’ is the means of the counter-revolution”? With the fall of Bolshevism, a great awakening of the Gentile nations would follow. The secret archives would be opened. Woe betide the world conquerors then!

[Page 211]

World Jewry changed its tactics after 1945, because it saw clearly that a showdown between the U.S.A. and the Soviet must be avoided at all costs. The policy now is so to debilitate America that she will have no strength left to defend herself in the end. And so Jewish nationalism, having established unparalleled financial and political power, through armament races, inflation, unemployment, world wars and revolutions, now turns round suddenly and becomes “peace-loving”. It starts the greatest political campaign of its history with the help of U.N.O. [in 1958 called the United Nations Organization],  U.N.E.S.C.O., the European Council of Strasbourg and various parliaments which are under its influence. With the world Press in its hands, it works with the sole aim of making America weak and isolated, of leaving her without allies on the day when the clock strikes and she has to face a showdown with the Soviet. The aim is to make the policy of the United States unpopular with other people, at the time when she should be rallying to her side the Christian nations and other non-Christian people, such as Mohammedans.

Jewry’s interests lie in Jewish world government on the concepts of Einstein, and the totalitarian Jewish State. And this nationalism, after having carried out the most bloodthirsty war propaganda campaign against Hitler, now makes an about-face. Now, the hidden hand, acting quietly behind the scenes, is taking steps to force America on her knees by augmenting as much as possible the strength of the Soviet Union and at the same time by crippling those forces which consider war against Bolshevism inevitable.

These tactics have had a certain “merit” in the past. But in Europe they were used only at the end of lost wars. They are known as sabotage and as whispering campaigns that poison the mind.

“Do not fight any longer, you people! The Russians are also humane!” went the whisper assailing the ears of those ready and willing to defend their country against Soviet barbarism.

[Page 212]

Morgenthau’s Policy Plans to crush the might of America by almost identical means:

“After all,” say the triumphant Jews to each other — the Jews who beat Hitler — “just read the Book of the Prophet Isaiah and you will see that not only the Protocols promised us power over the world, but the Prophet himself too: ‘Therefore thy gates shall be open continually; they shall not be shut day nor night; that men may bring unto thee the forces of the Gentiles, and that their kings may be brought.’” (Isaiah lx. 11.) “For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted.” (Isaiah Ix. 12.)

“Over there, on the other side of the Iron Curtain, 40,000 Soviet tanks, 15,000 aircraft and 175 divisions of the Soviet Army are waiting in readiness to overrun Europe and accomplish the fulfillment of our world power. Churchill said in 1949, that the atomic bomb alone was protecting America and Europe from a Soviet attack. But the atomic bomb, as you know, is ours!”

“Those who carry the secret of the atomic bomb to the Soviet Union are all our blood-brothers. It is just as if Einstein had selected them personally and sent them to carry out their great missions. Such are Klaus Fuchs, whose treason speeds up the production of the Soviet atomic bomb by two years, and Bruno Pontecorvo, the Italian Jew, who carried atomic secrets to the Soviet in eleven large trunks. There are also many others such as Harry Gold, David Greenglass, Julius Rosenberg, Emmanuel Bloch, William Perl, Professor of the University of Columbia, Abraham Brothmann, Mirijam Moskovich, Simson the plutonium thief Jew, Jánosi the Hungarian Jew who would protect Lazar Kaganovich’s empire with a cosmic ray curtain, John Vág-Weiszfeld, who was Harry Gold’s accomplice, David Boehm and Edwin David, all of them members of our race. Why is there not a single Christian among them? Because Gentiles are not reliable! The secret is ours; we do not deny it. Julius Rosenberg admitted frankly to the New York Court that ‘Soviet Russia is our ally and I considered her, therefore, entitled to receive such information from us!’…”

[Page 213]

America possessed hidden weapons, which could have made her the leading anti-Bolshevik world power. They were the greatest military secrets of history, with the help of which she could have delivered the world from the menace of servitude. These secrets had to be stolen and sold, so that as a substitute for the powers known as America and Russia, a single power should remain in the world: the world power of Jewish nationalism which keeps at bay both America and the Soviet Union. If it does nothing else, the betrayal of America will prove better than anything that there is a grandiose Jewish plan in existence to divide the world into eastern and western hemispheres, and consequently to rule both of them, and that this plan has so far been executed with the most ruthless efficiency.

Radar and the inter-continental rocket were also among the military secrets in the hand of the U.S., and these could have offered her the greatest security, even after the loss of the atomic bomb secret. But today it is established by the F.B.I. that Julius Rosenberg was also the head of the radar spying. After investigations, held in the military research institute at Monmouth, it came to light that the culprits who betrayed the radar secrets to the Soviet were almost exclusively all Jews. Professor H. Coleman and Morton Sobell, a spy sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment, Hyman Gerber Yavis, Carl Greenbaum and Miss Glassman can be mentioned amongst others in this connection.

The handing over of China to the Reds is one of the most horrible chapters in the betrayal of America. China was one of America’s best markets. She had to be forced into the red hemisphere at any price. Otherwise, in the case of a showdown, the 500 million Chinese, among whom Jewish subversive ambitions were never able to find a favourable soil, could have become a formidable ally on the side of the U.S. It is generally known today that Owen Lattimore, an American professor of dubious origin, Roosevelt’s chief adviser on Chinese questions, was working against the U.S. in the service of Soviet military espionage. For seven years he was editor of Pacific Affairs, a paper issued by the Institute of Pacific Relations, from which the Soviet Union received first-hand information regarding China. The investigating officers of the F.B.I. found 1,700 very confidential files in the offices of Amerasia. The fact that the persons detained in connection with this case were all Jews is important. John Stewart Service, Larsen Mano, Andrew Roth, John Abt, Nathan Witt, Lee Pressman, Philipp Jaffé, an ex-ambassador, and Maria Bachrach, had all betrayed America, the country which gave them a home to serve their Jewish world-conquering nationalism.

[Page 214]

“The problem was how to bring about the downfall of China so that it would not appear to be caused by the U.S.,” wrote Owen Lattimore.

“Due to Amerasia and to the extension of the policy of the fellow-traveller, 665 million souls vanished behind the Iron Curtain!” some American papers stated later.

America lost her greatest export market and one of her best trading partners. And the whole position in the Far East was shaken to its foundation. Those who divided the world into eastern and western hemispheres cannot deny the object of their action: Divide et impera! Divide your opponents and so rule them. Rule over America as well as over the Soviet Union.

In furthering this aim, the hidden hand had deployed its own men everywhere, upon whom it relied not to serve America but only the interests and power aspirations of Jewry. Before the outbreak of the Korean War a certain Lyman L. Lemnitzer, wearing the uniform of a major-general of the U.S. Army, was the military leader in South Korea, and on him falls the responsibility for neglecting its defences, as was declared in Congress. Later, the half-Jewish general, Mark W. Clark, son of Rebecca Ezekiel, became commander-in-chief in Korea. This man, while commanding the American occupation forces in Austria, handed over refugees and displaced persons by the thousand to the Soviet. It is no coincidence either that during the Korean War a certain Colonel A. C. Katzin was chief U.N. delegate over General MacArthur, while another Jew called George Movahon directed the Korean section of the U.N. Information Centre. During the time of the Persian oil crisis, a certain Michael J. Lee was head of the Far Eastern Division of the State Department, and it came to light that he emigrated from Soviet Russia into the United States in 1932, and that his original name was Efraim Zinoy Liebermann.

As in the Far East, so in Europe too, the exponents of world Jewry did everything to ruin America’s prestige and good name, and to eradicate from the hearts of the people of Europe those ideals, which picture her as the land of freedom. We referred already to the fact that the Morgenthau Plan was actually conceived In Moscow. Harry Dexter White, a Russian Jew, was Under-Secretary of the Treasury Department as well as Morgenthau’s deputy in Roosevelt’s administration. He was one of the most sinister figures of modern times, being at the same time leader of the Communist cells and spy rings carrying on their activities inside the U.S. Treasury Department.

[Page 215]

He stole and handed over to the Soviet Union the stereo plates, paper material and printing secrets of the so-called “Allied ‘Marks”, the banknotes designed for the allied occupation of Germany, and thus caused a financial loss of about 225 million dollars to American taxpayers. But besides the original stereo blocks or the occupation banknotes and printing formulas, there were other most confidential documents received by the Soviet from Harry Dexter White. In the Communist cell under his authority names were found such as Frank Cohen, Harold Glasser, Victor Perle, Irving Kaplan, Solomon Adler, Abraham George, Silverman and Ludwig Ullmann, etc. President Truman appointed White to the chairmanship of the International Monetary Fund, while Harold Glasser became financial director of U.N.R.R.A. It is to be ascribed to the activities of this Jewish spy ring that the gold reserves and foreign exchange bills of the Hungarian National Bank, estimated at 42 million dollars, were also handed over to the Soviet Union.

It is impossible to name here all the hundreds and thousands of Jews who were active in the most important key positions of the occupation zones of Germany, secretly furthering the Soviet cause and doing their best to Bolshevise Germany, as propagandists, C.I.C. or O.S.S. agents, press and theatrical officers, city commandants, financial experts, etc. The files of McCarthy’s Investigation Committee tell us more about these things than the best detective thriller and are a most startling historical documentation.

And as if all this was not enough, Jewish nationalism produced from its ranks the chief traitor Alger Hiss, who handed over 110 million Gentiles to the Kaganovich gang at Yalta. And the witness for the defence, who came forward and tried to save him, was nobody else but Felix Frankfurter, Judge of the Supreme Court of the U.S. And the protector of Alger Hiss after his conviction was nobody else but the great senator, the uncrowned king of New York, Herbert H. Lehmann, father-in-law of Buttenwieser, who tried to hide the chief traitor of America in his flat.

[Page 216]

But the most characteristic feature of the treason committed against America does not concern the atomic bomb, the radar spy ring or the other spy scandals, but the active role of American Jews in the Communist movements. Here again the old saying is vindicated that;

“perhaps all Jews are not Bolsheviks but without Jews there would be no Bolshevism!”

The majority of America’s Jewish population came from countries behind the Iron Curtain. The greatest number of them fled to America to escape pogroms in Russia. America is not ruled by the Czars but by a so-called democratic regime. She gave the Jews everything, including even the privilege of taking part in the administration of the country. Yet despite all this generosity, the Jews were, and are today, actively at the head of all anti-American and Communist subversive movements.

The Communist Party has been planted in America and it is led by the same type of people who were leaders of the Russian Bolshevik Revolution. The members of the American Politburo, popularly referred to as the “Great Eleven” are, not taking Negroes into account, almost exclusively Jews: Eugen Dennies, Henry Winston, John Hates, Irving Pothias, Gilbert Green, Carl Winter and Guss Holl.

“If a spy or a Communist leader is detained anywhere,” boasts the voice of Old Testament “Nazism”, “he always comes from our ranks. Judith Coplon, the beautiful Jewish girl from Brooklyn, sold the most confidential files of the State Department to Gubichev, a Soviet agent. And we saw to it that she will not come to any serious harm.”

Again we perceive the flashing coil of the symbolic serpent in America, the emblem of Jewish nationalism, the network of which covers and reaches everything. It controls the banks, house property, family life, State, Press, society and the trade unions.

When the Californian Communist conspiracy was detected, the same well-known characters were dragged out of their underground hiding places by the F.B.I. The race of these traitors is stamped on their features. Robert H. Williams’ book, Know Your Enemy, shows a series of photographs of the American traitors. Under characteristic faces appear characteristic names. Alexander Bittelman appears in this picture gallery as one of the founder members of the American Communist Party, and the other leaders with him are: Gerhard Eisler, Jacob Abraham “Jack” Stachel, Leon Josephson, Alexander Trachtenberg and J. Peters (Goldberger). The participants in the recent Hollywood plot are: Dr. Sidney Weinbaum, Dr. Jacob Dubnov, Philip Bart, director of the Daily Worker, Alex Trachtenberg, V. J. Jerome, leader of the Bolshevik Cultural Committee (whose real name is Isaac Romaine), Simon Gerson, Elizabeth G. Flynn, Alex Bittelman, Betty Gannet, Isadore Begun, Jacob Minden, Claudia Jones (negress), Israel Amter, William Weinstone, George Charney, Fred Fine, Sid Steinberger, Louis Weinstock and Js. Jackson.

[Page 217]

The Reader’s Digest confirms that of the eleven top leaders of the American Communist Party, six are Jews, two are Negroes, and only three are American-born citizens. According to the same paper, the most important Bolshevik leaders are: Jacob Stachel, John Gates (alias Solomon Regenstreif), editor of the Daily Worker, Gill Green (alias Gilbert Greenburg), Gus Hall (alias Arvo Kustaa Hallberg of Lithuanian Jewish parentage), Irving Potiash, a Soviet Russian Jew, and Carl Winter (alias Philip Carl Weinberg).

Can all this be explained away as accidental? Is it merely a strange coincidence that the names of those directing subversive activities in America are the same as those turning up on the list of leaders of the Soviet Bolsheviks and of Hungarian and Rumanian Communists? 1s it another coincidence that the first five men to be removed from the U.S. Army for Communist activities, namely Harry Specor, Phil Weiss, Irving Specor, Abraham Kotlechuk and Rheabel Mendelsohn, were Jews too? Could it be really just chance that ninety-five percent of those persons summoned before the McCarthy Investigation Committee for Anti-American Activities and found guilty, were Jews as well? And may it not be a sense of guilt that, according to the Congressional Record of May 17th, 1946, all Jewish members of Congress voted for the discontinuation of the hearings of the Dies Committee investigating anti-American activities? Moreover, did not Senator McCarthy inform Bernard Baruch himself that as all the television networks in the United States were in the hands of the Jews, he would not be given the chance to expose the American traitors by means of the television service?

Another decisive proof of the existence of Jewish “Nazism” is the fact that those participating in American Communist movements never come from the “proletariat”, i.e., from the working class or from destitute people, but from Jews occupying the highest strata of American society. The publication Red Stars Over Hollywood draws attention to the fact that out of those Hollywood film stars whose earnings amount to millions of dollars, one hundred are Bolsheviks and all of these are Jews. To these people America gave glamour, wealth and success. And despite everything they are still Bolsheviks, or to put it more concisely, we think they are Bolsheviks. These stars, led by Charlie Chaplin (alias Israel Thornstein) are, first and foremost, Jews, who visualise in Bolshevism the perfect accomplishment of Jewish world power, and look upon Bolshevism as a bulwark of that totalitarian Jewish world rule of which they themselves will be the intellectual elite.

[Page 218]

The 3,500 American professors who took part in various Communist demonstrations also belonged to the storm-troops of this Old Testament nationalism. The overwhelming majority of them are Jews. The Communist teachers against whom disciplinary action was taken on account of their Bolshevik activities, also belong to the pioneers of this supranational “Nazism”. Among them were Abraham Biedermann, Cellis Lewis, Citron, Mark Friedländer, Isadore Rubin, Abraham Feingold, David Friedman, Louis Jaffe and so on. The first saboteurs detained on the outbreak of the Korean War were: Max Schnalzer, Minton Silverman, Samuel Zakkman and Samuel Kerr. At this time Nathan Ostroff sold the Chinese Communists ten million pounds’ worth of rubber to ensure that the armies of Red China marched in rubber boots against the soldiers of the U.S. The following were amongst the first batch of the above-mentioned Hollywood Communist film stars and film producers summoned before the Investigation Committee: John Howard Lawson, Dalton Trumbo, Ring Lardner, Albert Maltz, Alvah Bessie, Herbert Biberman and Samuel Ornitz — all of them Jews.

World Jewry’s greatest act of treason against America is that it undermined the earlier goodwill and trust of other peoples towards America, especially in the Near East and in Mohammedan countries. And it is of little use for the Americans to try to find excuses. This was no mistake of “inexperienced” diplomacy because it was part of a deliberate Jewish world scheme.

Corruption became prevalent in the State Department and later grew out of all proportion during Roosevelt’s anti-American activities. According to figures quoted by The Hidden Empire, eighty-six percent of the staff employed in the State Department was Jewish. And according to the McCarthy Committee, 5,000 homosexuals were then employed in the Civil Service. Such corruption and degradation proved itself to be the best ally of Bolshevism everywhere.

[Page 219]

Through cracks in the structure of the administration, through faults and weaknesses of dishonest and corruptible civil servants, Communist spies, agents and gangsters infiltrate into the Government of the country. At the same time, Communist propaganda will say to the ignorant masses:

“Look at them! Are these men your masters?”

But this does not explain the most important point, i.e., that these men or the majority of them at any rate, are Jews. When democracy sinks to such a low level that Jews can behave as they wish, then corruption cannot be checked and the rapid progress of Bolshevism is ensured.

World Jewry’s programme since 1945 has been to weaken America as much as possible. America is to be undermined by Communist conspiracy and corrupt practices. Her armament industry must be disorganised so that Bolshevism — the higher and safer form of the Communist system and of Jewish world power — can score an easy victory.

It is true that American Jewish organisations issued a declaration in 1950 against Communism, but this was a deception only! American Jews in fact wish to achieve very different aims from what they say. One of the most influential personalities among American Jews wrote in the leading article of the B’nai B’rith Messenger on November 1st, 1948:

“My soul revolts when I hear and have to stomach the fact that Fascism and Communism are concepts of identical composition. Some people talk about Communism … I say: this is Jewish ideology!”

And whenever Jewry has taken off its mask for one or two brief moments on various historical occasions, much the same message was delivered.

In celebration of the Bolshevik Revolution, the same idea was expressed in the Parisian newspaper Peuple Juif, on February 8th, 1919:

“World revolution, which some of us may live to see, is and must remain our concern, and its preparation must be in our hands. By means of this world revolution the power of Jewry will be established over all nations of the world.”

Zinoviev-Apfelbaum, the great Eastern Brother, announced the same thing when he received an eleven billion dollars Lend-Lease from the hand of La Guardia:

“We exterminated the Capitalists and the landowners in Soviet Russia, and we will go to any length to do the same to the intelligentsia of Europe and America.”

[Page 220]

And the Jew from Germany, who today might be an immigrant in America or a deputy-governor in Germany or perhaps an American press officer, said essentially the same thing in his German newspaper soon after the First World War:

“We must continue our fight not only for our own existence but to achieve world power for Jewry as a whole; it is for this we have ceaselessly worked during the last 2,000 years.” (Israelitische Wochenblatt, January 5th, 1926, Leipzig.)

All nations, including the U.S.A., must vanish. This is after all an old-world programme. That great leader of Jewry, Adolphe Crémieux, president of the Alliance Israélite Universelle, said almost a hundred years ago:

“The nations must vanish and religions must be suppressed. Only Israel must not disappear, for this small nation is the chosen people of God.”

Why, therefore, do the Americans believe that amongst the various national groups who immigrated to America and settled there, the group composing Jewry is just like any of the others? How could the American people imagine that Jewry will remain loyal to America when they were not loyal to the Roman Empire, to Spain or to Portugal or to any State in the world? There is no doubt that Jewry’s most resplendent dream is to become master of the United States and to treat her the same as other nations have been treated.

And why do Americans believe that this is not possible?

The proportion of Communists in those States conquered by Bolshevism was not more than three to five percent of the population at the beginning of “direct action”. In Russia nobody had ever heard of Bolshevism before 1917, when the Imperial General Staff of the Kaiser permitted Lenin and his gang to pass through Germany on their journey from Switzerland to Russia. Not a single Bolshevik was to be found in Hungary until 1919, i.e., until Béla Kun’s short-lived terror regime. The leaders were sent by Lenin and his gang operating from Russia. When in 1945, Mátyás Rákosi-Roth and his confederates returned to Hungary, the total number of underground Communist Party members was only 140.

[Page 221]

At the end of 1945, during the Hungarian elections, Communists secured seventeen percent of the total votes. They failed to gather more than three to four percent of the votes in Austria at that time, though by then the Communists in both Austria and Hungary were supported by the bayonet of the Soviet armies. The position in Rumania, Eastern Germany and Bulgaria was similar. Nevertheless, all these States are today in the iron grip of Bolshevik dictatorships.

The Bolshevik Party is by nature conspiratorial; it is a fanatical sect. In the beginning, Churchill saw this plainly and said so. This fanaticism is able to overcome even the most perfect democracy. Freedom is good because it can be exploited and misused! The greater the freedom, the greater is the menace of Bolshevism.

According to American estimates, Communist Party members in the U.S. number about 60 to 100 thousand persons only. Therefore, say the Americans, there can be no Bolshevism in America, where the standard of living is the highest in the world. As we can see, American democracy works moderately well and such a small Communist majority should stand no chance whatever of subjugating a powerful country of 160 million people.

Edgar Hoover, director of F.B.I, says that to the 100,000 Bolsheviks another 500,000 fellow travellers can be added.

If this is so, the overall picture of Bolshevism in America is immediately changed and may be summed up as follows:   we have 100,000 conspirators plus 500,000 fellow travellers (amongst these many holding important posts and key positions), plus five to six million Jews, plus twelve million Negroes, plus corruption, plus Soviet espionage, plus the national Press, television and radio networks (100 percent which are in Jewish hands), and finally, plus the ever-rising crime wave in which juvenile delinquency plays a shocking part.

Amongst the Negroes are many God-fearing, civilized and fine citizens. But the Negro feels he is a “slighted” person, and the Bolsheviks have always recruited their fifth columns from such people. Many Jews are not Bolsheviks at all. But the Jew is always a nationalist and he turns Bolshevik as soon as he recognizes the Jewish character of Bolshevism. According to Gerald K. Smith there are already at least half a million conscientious and fanatical Bolsheviks in the ranks of American Jewry. And, according to the highest estimate, the Russian Revolution was started by only 500 Jews.

[Page 222]

Working along these lines, the American Communist Party, led by American Jews, passed the following resolution on February 5th, 1951:

“… and our congress accordingly placed on its agenda, as its main concern, the fight for peace, the fight for the working class and for the coloured people, besides calling for the mobilisation of all peace-loving forces in the country.”

The Communist wing of Jewry intends, as can be seen from the foregoing, to mobilise the Black population of America. Half a million Jews intend thus to realise a ghastly American-Jewish dream. They plan to organise and to arm a Negro terror-force of one million men, led by American Jewish commissars.

The Communist wing of Jewry co-operates with those Jews who champion the rights of the Black man. The Hungarian Daily Journal, an admittedly Jewish Communist paper, printed a very illuminating article in its issue of April 14th, 1950, under the title: “The Jews fought for the rights of the Negroes and workers.” The article tells us about E. L. Rose, a Jew born in Poland, who came to America after the defeat of the 1848 Revolution in Vienna, and who made several speeches championing the Negroes, and thus became the leader of the movement for the liberation of Negroes in St. Louis. The Russian Jew, S. A. Bierfield, is referred to by Jewish Communist propaganda as a martyr of Negro-Jewish cooperation, when gangsters murdered him in his shop with his Negro servant. The above-mentioned article also points out that when the pamphlet “Labour and Capital”, by Karl Marx was edited in Yiddish in 1888, enthusiastic Jews of the East Side set out to organise trade unions among the Negroes.

Due to the opposition of religious Negroes, the great dream of American Communist Jews — the organisation of a large Negro terror force — has so far failed, but it will appear less of a dream to us if we read the reports of the American Special Committee on un-American Activities. According to these reports, the American Communist Party had 1,160 organisations among general labourers, farmers and Negroes, including political, and even so-called religious, groups and sections.

[Page 223]

John T. Flynn, the courageous American publicist, in his book The Road Ahead, quotes a rather formidable list of Negro Communist organisations. From this we learn that there are eighty-eight large Negro organisations working for American Bolshevism. Amongst these are the African Blood Brotherhood and many other movements and sects bearing the most varied titles and operating under the pretext of being religious peace movements.

The Americans are not yet acquainted with the tactics of Jewish nationalism. But the advent of an economic crisis, a third world war, or instability resulting from a lost war would be quite sufficient for hell to be let loose in America. The devils of Bolshevism were similarly let loose in Russia in 1917, in the Danubian Monarchy in 1918, and in the whole of Eastern Europe in 1945.

And if this happens in America, the day of the world kingdom will have dawned. The old promise will be carried out in accordance with the written instructions:

“It is from us that the all-engulfing terror proceeds.”

The Black Army will march led by the eleven leading members of the American Politburo, six of whom are Jews. This will be a force of one million fanatics held under iron discipline, to whom American white women will be promised. This will be the world’s most gigantic M.V.D., led by 500,000 commissars, officers, agents and secret police of the seed of Abraham, and it will assume power over America. But the ruthless ones will now come out of the ghettos of Brooklyn; of the Jewish quarters of Bronx and the stark masses of East Polish immigrants will be on the move. A Black army will emerge from Harlem too. The hearts of the Black soldiers will be suffused with hatred, and their thirst for blood, now disguised by a veneer of civilisation, will be whetted by Jewish propaganda. These Blacks hate the Whites, but they will not hate Jews whom they believe are their liberators, though in reality they are their lords and masters, and as such will be protected by the brute force of the Blacks.

Private capital amassed by individual Jews and others will be taken over by Jewish State Capitalism in order to get complete control over the enormous wealth of the United States of America. Jewry will run the Federal Government as well as the State Governments, and will abolish democracy and voting by ballot.

[Page 224]

The Jews no doubt reason somewhat as follows:

“The Americans say: ‘This is not possible in our country!’”

But so far it has turned out to be possible everywhere. And if the American people tried to resist us we should erect a gallows on Capitol Hill in front of the While House; and these gallows would be guarded by King David’s fierce black bodyguard, by twelve million Negroes and six million Jews. This power will be as firm as a rock. Just try to revolt, you people of Washington…! Try to rise against us, you American freedom fighters, and your fate will be that of Wrangel’s guards who, once tried to rise against us also! The sword of Damocles is now suspended over your head. Atomic artillery will exterminate you if you dare to go to war against our great King David. We should already have erected scaffolds and you must not expect either humanity or philanthropy to be shown once total power falls into our hands. No; it is from us the all-engulfing terror proceeds!

“Just think of what happened to the freedom fighters who defended the various Eastern European cities against our Bolshevik armies. At one end of the street fighting was still going on when we broke out of the ghettos; for we who supposedly never fought, took off our mask at the last moment. And when the freedom fighter looked through his sights into the city occupied by our Bolshevik troops, he could see that after half an hour gallows were standing there. We had erected them and we came out of the ghettos to hang our enemies on them — the Christians.”

And this vision may become a reality at any time because Jewry has betrayed America. The only question now is: Will the American people awaken while there is yet time to act? If they did, another terrible vision might come true, i.e., that of Oscar Straus, a great American financier and businessman:

“It is my people. I’m telling you my friend, that if my people do not mend their ways and be good citizens and that soon, the time is coming when America is going to see pogroms beside which the pogroms of Europe will have been nothing!”

One thing Oscar Strauss did not point out is that the way to solve the Jewish problem is not that of the pogrom. Physical force promotes only disarmed nationalism.

Jewish world conquest must be defeated, but by different methods. For if it is not soon checked, the hours of freedom for Americans and the rest of mankind, are running out fast with the sands of time.

[Page 225]