Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 10 – National Socialism vs Communism

[Part 10]

 

[Benton Bradberry’s 2012 book, “The Myth of German Villainy” is a  superb, must-read, revisionist look at how the German people have been systematically, relentlessly and most importantly, unjustly vilified as the arch criminal of the 20th century. Bradberry sets out, cooly and calmly as befits a former US-Navy officer and pilot, to show why and how the German people have been falsely accused of massive crimes and that their chief  accuser and tormentor, organized jewry is in fact the real party guilty of monstrous crimes against Germans and the rest of the world.

In Part 10, the profound differences between Communism and National Socialism are described. Under jewish communism there were no private rights or property and the economy was controlled through “central planning”, while NS supported both private and property rights, upheld Western and Christian values, and guided the economy.

NS was, besides its dedication to the well-being of the German people, a counter-movement against jewish communism. It embodied the philosophical ideas from a variety of popular writers and thinkers of the 19th and early 20th centuries and emphasized the concept of das Volk (the people as a national race), which required the subordination of the individual to the “community,” as well as “faith in the leader”.

In contrast, communism was dedicated to the very destruction of Western, Christian society, murdering upwards of 40 million of Russia’s best people and attempted to carry out similar policies throughout Europe in the name of creating a so-called, “Marxist Utopia”. To create this “Utopia”, Bolshevik Jews unleashed the greatest bloodbath in history, far exceeding anything the Mongols did, and incomparably worse than anything the “notorious Nazis” allegedly carried out —  KATANA.]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOTE: The author has very generously given me permission to reproduce the material here — KATANA.

 The book can be bought at Amazon here: The Myth of German Villainy

 

 

 

The Myth of

 

German Villainy

 

by

 

Benton L. Bradberry

 

 

 

 

 

Contents

[Clicking on a link in the Contents here will take you to that Part, in a separate post]

 

[Part 01]

Preface

Chapter 1 – The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation

Germany’s Positive Image Changes Overnight

[Part 02]

Chapter 2 – Aftermath of the War in Germany

The Versailles Treaty

Effect of the Treaty on the German Economy

Was the War Guilt Clause Fair?

Did Germany Really Start the War?

[Part 03]

Chapter 3 – The Jewish Factor in the War

Jews at the Paris Peace Conference

Jews in Britain

[Part 04]

Chapter 4 – The Russian Revolution of 1917

Bolsheviks Take Control

Jews and the Russian Revolution

Origin of East European Jews

Reason for the Russian Pogroms Against the Jews

Jews Leave Russia for America

Financing the 1917 Revolution

Jews in the Government of Bolshevik Russia

[Part 05]

Chapter 5 – The Red Terror

Creation of the Gulag

Bolsheviks Kill the Czar

Jews as a Hostile Elite

The Ukrainian Famine (Holodomor)

[Part 06]

Chapter 6 – The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads Throughout Europe

Jews in the Hungarian Revolution

Miklos Horthy Saves Hungary

Jews in the German Revolution

The Spartacist Uprising in Berlin

Jewish Bolsheviks Attempt to Take Italy

Jewish Bolsheviks Attempt to Take Spain — The Spanish Civil War

Czechoslovakia in Danger of Communist Takeover

The Comintern’s Aim? World Domination!

[Part 07]

Chapter 7 – The Nation of Israel

History of the Expulsion of Jews

[Part 08]

Chapter 8 – Jews in Weimar Germany

Jews Undermine German Culture

[Part 09]

Chapter 9 – Hitler & National Socialists Rise to Power

The 25 Points of the National Socialist Party

[Part 10]

Chapter 10 – National Socialism vs. Communism

National Socialism

Jews Plan Marxist Utopia

[Part 11]

Chapter 11 – Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany

Text of Untermeyer’s Speech in New York

The Jewish Persecution Myth

Effect of Boycott on the German Economy

Jewish Exaggerations are Contradicted by Many

[Part 12]

Chapter 12 – The Nazis and the Zionists Actually Work Together for Jewish Emigration out of Germany

The Nuremberg Laws – 1935

The Zionist Movement

[Part 13]

Chapter 13 – Life in Germany Under Hitler

Night of the Long Knives

1934 Annual Nazi Rally at Nuremberg

Hitler Revives the German Economy

Hitler Becomes the Most Popular Leader in the World

[Part 14]

Chapter 14 – Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory

Chapter 15 – The 1936 Olympics

[Part 15]

Chapter 16 – Anschluss”. The Unification of Austria and Germany

Austrian Economy Revived

Austria’s Jews

[Part 16]

Chapter 17 – Germany Annexes the Sudetenland

[Part 17]

Chapter 18 – War with Poland

The Polish Problem

Hitler’s Proposal to Poland

Kristallnacht

German-Polish Talks Continue

Jews Influence both Roosevelt and Churchill

British and American Political Leaders Under Jewish Influence

Roosevelt’s Contribution to Hostilities

Lord Halifax Beats the War Drums

Germany Occupies Bohemia and Moravia

Roosevelt Pushes for War

Anti-war Movement Becomes Active

Poles Murder German Nationals Within the Corridor

[Part 18]

Chapter 19 – The Phony War

Russo-Finnish War

The Norway/Denmark Campaign

German Invasion of Denmark and Norway

Churchill Takes Chamberlain’s Place as Prime Minister

[Part 19]

Chapter 20 – Germany invades France Through the Low Countries

The Phony War Ends.

Churchill the War Lover

The Fall of France

Hitler Makes Peace Offer to Britain

[Part 20]

Chapter 21 – The Allied Goal? Destruction of Germany!

[Part 21]

Chapter 22 – Germany as Victim

Rape and Slaughter

Jewish Vengeance

The Jewish Brigade

[Part 22]

Chapter 23 – Winners and Losers

Bibliography

 

 

 

Chapter 10

 


National Socialism vs Communism

 

 

 

 

German National Socialism has usually been characterized as a right wing ideology while Communism is said to occupy the extreme left of the socio-political spectrum. This is the traditional view. But there are those today who say that Hitler’s obsessive hatred of Communism was disingenuous because German National Socialism was essentially no different from Communism. Both were totalitarian Socialist creeds. But this is a superficial observation, and the terms, “right” and “left” are insufficient to describe the two systems. It is true that National Socialism contained aspects of socialism, as its name implied, but the differences between National Socialism and Communism were profound.

 

The most obvious difference was that National Socialism supported the concept of private property and a market economy, while Communism abolished private property and the government controlled the economy through “central planning.” Under National Socialism the means of production was for the most part in private hands, albeit, “guided” by the state.

 

Under Communism all private property, including farmland, manufacturing, or the means of production, and even private housing, were seized by the state. The only similarity between the two systems was that both were totalitarian in nature, though, between the two, National Socialism was considerably more benign. Under National Socialism, the private rights of “citizens” were respected and protected, while under Communism there were no private rights.

 

[Add. image — Communism, Capitalism and National Socialism compared.]

 

Hitler had this to say about the meaning of “Socialism” for Germany, as printed in an article in the UK’s “Guardian, Sunday Express,” December 28, 1938:

Socialist’ I define from the word ‘social’ meaning in the main ‘social equity’. A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency. Our adopted term ‘Socialist’ has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not.

 

Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, or efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.” Adolf Hitler.

The two systems were also different in their aims. National Socialism under Adolf Hitler was a revolutionary movement in “defense” of Western, Christian civilization, while Communism was a revolutionary movement dedicated to its “destruction.” Harold Cox, Member of Parliament in Britain at the time, and a classical liberal scholar, wrote:

What Socialists (Communists) want is not progress in the world as we know it, but the destruction of that world as a prelude to the creation of a new world of their own imagining…Their ethical outlook is the direct reverse of that which has inspired all great religions of the world…and they deliberately make their appeal to the passions of envy, hatred and malice.” Harold Cox.

 

[Add. Image — Harold Cox (1859 – 1936).]

 

The Communist Jews who took control of Russia did their utmost to destroy the traditional Christian culture of Russia and they murdered upwards of 40 million of Russia’s best people. It has been said that the average IQ for Russia was lowered several points by this slaughter of the “intelligentsia” and all the other successful, achieving people in Russia.

Through their “Communist International” (Comintern), they intended to do the same to all of Europe. The long term goal of International Jewish Communism, which had established its base in Russia, was to destroy the existing political regimes throughout Europe, and replace them, one by one, with Soviet Republics on the Russian model. Once in power, they intended the obliteration of the “possessing classes,” that is, to kill them, as they had done in Russia. Europe had every reason to shudder in horror at the prospect of a Communist takeover.

 

National Socialism (Nazism) developed after 1918 as a counter-movement to the Bolshevik revolution, and to a lesser extent, against the democratic parliamentary system, as manifested in the Weimar Republic. In an article in the Nazi newspaper, “Völkischer Beobachter,” May 11, 1933 ― soon after becoming Chancellor ― Hitler wrote:

For fourteen or fifteen years I have continually proclaimed to the German nation that I regard it as my task before posterity to destroy Marxism, and that is no empty phrase but a solemn oath which I shall follow as long as I live. I have made this confession of faith, the confession of faith of a single man, that of a mighty organization [National Socialism]. I know now that even if fate were to remove me, the fight would be fought to the end; this movement is the guarantee for that. This for us is not a fight which can be finished by compromise. We see in Marxism the enemy of our people which we will root out and destroy without mercy … We must then fight to the very end those tendencies which have eaten into the soul of the German nation in the last seventeen years, which have done us such incalculable damage and which, if they had not been vanquished, would have destroyed Germany. Bismarck told us that liberalism was the pace-maker of Social Democracy. I need not say here that Social Democracy is the pace-maker of Communism. And Communism is the forerunner of death, of national destruction, and extinction. We have joined battle with it and will fight it to the death.”

 

 

National Socialism

 

National Socialism did not spring fully formed out of Adolf Hitler’s head alone, though he made enormous contributions to its formation. It’s detractors (Jewish propagandists) characterized Nazi ideology as the shallow fantasies of bigoted psychopaths, but in fact, National Socialism was a coherent, well grounded social philosophy worked out by highly regarded thinkers and scholars. Contrary to his popular image, Hitler, himself, was a thinker and a philosopher of first rank.

 

History Professor Lawrence Birken of Ball State University in Indiana claims that Adolf Hitler was the most philosophical of all historical leaders.

Hitler had a gift for presenting his message in an attractive, accessible form.”

 

Writes Birken:

The most attractive feature of Hitler’s ideology was thus its optimism. It was not merely his mood but his message that carried an infectious excitement. He was a secular messiah proclaiming a Germanic version of the “good news.”

 

[Add. Image — “Birken challenges the conventional wisdom that Hitlerism was a revolt against Western values. Utilizing Adolph Hitler’s major writings, speeches, and recorded conversations, this path-breaking study in intellectual history delineates the relationship of Nazism to other European ideologies, both past and present. National Socialism, Birken maintains, was nothing less than an attempt to create a metaphysical foundation for the German nation-state after both the Frankfurt Assembly and the Bismarckian pseudo-Reich had failed to do so. In this context, Hitler can be seen as the last great exponent of the Enlightenment tradition that glorified fraternity.” Amazon description.]

 

The possibility of class reconciliation, the plans for a national revival, the identification of a universal enemy whose elimination would usher in the millennium, all stirred his audiences to the very depths. Hitler spoke the language of the [Enlightenment] philosophers, a language that had almost passed out of existence in the rarefied strata of the grand intelligentsia.

 

National Socialism’s intellectual roots grew out of the philosophical ideas of a variety of popular writers and thinkers of the 19th and early 20th centuries, including the following:

 

Friedrich Nietzsche’s theory of “will to power,” the components of which were, achievement, ambition, and striving to reach the highest possible position in life. Nietzsche believed that “will to power” was the main driving force in man.

 

Arthur de Gobineau’s racialist theory of the “Aryan master race.” Gobineau was a French aristocrat, novelist, and man of letters who became famous for developing the racialist theory of the Aryan master race in his book, “An Essay on the Inequalities of the Human Races” (1855). Gobineau believed that the white race was superior to other races, manifested by its achievements in developing a civilized culture and in maintaining ordered government. He believed that “race mixing” would result in decline and chaos. Gobineau’s views were by no means unusual at the time. They were generally shared by the entire white race.

 

Houston Stewart Chamberlain, British author of books on political philosophy and natural science. Chamberlain generally supported Gobineau’s ideas on the superiority of the Aryan race and also became an advocate of racial “purity.” He believed that the Teutonic peoples had profoundly influenced Western civilization, but that other European peoples had also done so. He included not just Germans, but Celts, Slavs, Greeks, Latins, and even Berbers from North Africa into the “Aryan race.”

 

Richard Wagner’sfaith in destiny.” Wagner, a friend of Nietzsche, developed the idea that the German people should have faith in their destiny for greatness. He also saw the Jew as a parasite on the host populations they lived amongst and the natural enemy of Germany.

 

Gregor Johann Mendel’s theory of genetics and heredity. Mendel was an Austrian scientist and Augustinian friar who was the founder of the science of genetics. He demonstrated that inheritance of certain traits in pea plants follow particular patterns. He developed the laws of “inherited traits” by experimenting on plants, which was then extrapolated to work the same in human beings.

 

Alfred Ploetz and Harvard Professor Lothard Stoddard both espoused social Darwinism, which led to the development of the science of Eugenics, or race cleansing. Eugenics was widely popular in the early decades of the twentieth century, both in the United States and in Europe. The First International Congress of Eugenics in 1912 was supported by many prominent people, including its president Leonard Darwin, the son of Charles Darwin, honorary vice president Winston Churchill, Alexander Graham Bell, et al.

 

Karl Haushofer, a German general, geographer and geopolitician who advocated lebensraum as the remedy for overcrowding in Germany. (The British, for example, had a similar overcrowding problem which they alleviated with their own version of lebensraum, large scale emigration of Britons to the colonies.)

Other influences of Nazi ideology were the ideas of Machiavelli, Fichte, Treitschke and Spengler.

 

The National Socialist (Nazi) ideology contained these basic points: nationalism, anti-Semitism, anti-Communism, and militarism. Jews were considered racially alien to Europe and the source of most of Europe’s troubles, especially as the source of Communist revolution. Hitler called for the defense of the “Blood and Soil” of the German people by, expelling the Jews from Germany, by limiting immigration into Germany only to those of German blood, and by maintaining a strong military.

 

[Add. Image — One difference between jewish communism, where workers are enslaved to work for its rulers and National Socialism, where the both the leaders and the led work together for the common good.]

 

National Socialism emphasized the concept of das Volk (the people as a national race), which required the subordination of the individual to the “community,” as well as “faith in the leader (Fuhrer).” Hitler believed that Germany, as the largest and most powerful nation state in continental Europe, should be the leader of an economically unified Europe (something like the European Union of today, which, incidentally, is led by Germany). National Socialism emphasized the community of the German Volk, and glorified the comradeship of men in arms as defenders of the German nation. The Nazi movement became a magnet for those who had become disillusioned by the chaos in Germany under the Weimar Republic.

 

Although he is endlessly castigated as “the most notorious racist of the twentieth century,” Hitler’s racial views were in perfect harmony with mainstream 19th and early 20th-century European thinking. Far from being aberrant or bizarre, his views on race were consistent with those of most prominent Westerners in the decades before the Second World War, such as those of Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill, for example.

 

Contrary to popular belief, Hitler never supported any program of breeding a homogenous blond “hyper-Aryan” race. That was just propaganda. He fully accepted the reality that the German population consisted of several distinct sub-racial groups, and stressed the German people’s national and social unity. A certain degree of racial variety was desirable, he thought, and too much racial blending or homogeneity could be harmful because it would homogenize and thus eliminate superior as well as inferior genetic traits.

 

Alfred Rosenberg, Ph. D

 

The most influential Nazi guidebook, after Hitler’s “Mein Kampf,” was Alfred Rosenberg’s “Myth of the Twentieth Century” (1935). Rosenberg, who held a Ph.D. in architectural engineering, was one of the principal ideologues of the Nazi Party and editor of the Nazi paper “Volkisher Beobachter.” Rosenberg believed that every people, culture and nation has a set of beliefs, or a national “myth,” and if and when that myth ever dies, the nation too will die. (A great many comparisons can be made between the period at the end of the Weimar Republic and America today.

 

The American myth, based on Christian belief and the ideals of our founding fathers is under constant attack today, and is being corrupted on a daily basis.) The German national “myth,” according to Rosenberg, was in danger of dying, and he made it his mission to resurrect it.

 

Rosenberg makes a distinction between the “nation,” or the “Volk,” and the state. The nation is the people or the Volk. The state is the apparatus of government.

The state,” he wrote, “is nowadays no longer an independent idol, before which everything must bow down; the state is not even an end but is only a means for the preservation of the “Volk”…. Forms of the state change, and the laws of the state pass away; the Volk remains. From this alone follows that the nation (Volk) is the first and last; that to which everything else has to be subordinated.”

 

No ‘Volk’ of Europe is racially pure,” he wrote, “including Germany. In accordance with the newest researches, we recognize five races, which exhibit noticeably different types. It is unquestionably true that the Nordic race primarily has borne the genuine cultural fruits of Europe. The great heroes, artists, founders of states have come from this race…. Nordic blood created German life above all others. Even those sections, in which only a small part today is pure Nordic, have their basic stock from the Nordic race. Nordic is German and has functioned so as to shape the culture and human types of the westisch, dinarisch, and ostisch-Baltisch races. Also a type which is predominantly dinarisch has often been innerly formed in a Nordic mode. This emphasis on the Nordic race does not mean a sowing of ‘race-hatred’ in Germany, but on the contrary, the conscious acknowledgment of a kind of racial cement within our nationality.” (Emphasis added.)

 

… On the day when Nordic blood should completely dry up, Germany would fall to ruin, would decline into a characterless chaos. That many forces are consciously working toward this, has been discussed in detail.

 

Europe’s states have all been founded and preserved by the Nordic man….. In order to preserve Europe, the Nordic energies of Europe must first be revitalized, strengthened. That means then Germany, Scandinavia with Finland, and England.

 

… Nordic Europe is the fated future, with a German central Europe. Germany as racial and national state, as central power of the continent, safe-guarding the south and southeast; the Scandinavian states with Finland as a second group, safe-guarding the northeast; and Great Britain, safe-guarding the west and overseas at those places where required in the interest of the Nordic Man.

 

It is clear from Rosenberg’s writings that the Germans, including Hitler, never considered themselves the Master Race, and never referred to themselves as such. That accusation was nothing more than Jewish propaganda. The attitude of the British on this matter was identical to that of the Germans. The British were equally as nationalistic as the Germans, and the British considered themselves to be a part of a superior race. Moreover, both the Germans and the British openly acknowledged that the two nations, Britain and Germany, were of the same race and of the same blood. (Yet, Rosenberg was hanged after the Nuremberg Trials for his views, as expressed above.)

 

 

Jews Plan Marxist Utopia

 

While Hitler and the Nazis were busy resurrecting Germany on the basis of the national myth of the German Volk whom they considered the foundation of Western, Christian civilization ― in Russia, the Jews were busy destroying the traditional Russian, Christian culture. Moreover, the very first program initiated whenever Jewish-led Communists took over a country, i.e., Russia, Hungary and Spain, was to try to eradicate the Christian church. They rounded up the priests, nuns and monks by the thousands and shot them, and then burned down the churches and cathedrals. Hitler and the Nazis considered the Jewish Communists as the destroyers of Western, Christian civilization, and they dedicated themselves to Communism’s eventual destruction.

 

The “Communism” which these Marxist Jews who now controlled Russia dreamed of, and intended to impose on Russia ― and the rest of the world, if they could ― was a strictly theoretical (and completely unproven) system imagined by Karl Marx in which all of society, all of economics and all politics would be combined into one perfect, classless, culture-less, government-less system based on common ownership of all economic means of production (meaning government ownership), with complete social and economic equality, which would, in the end, run itself without the necessity of having a government. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels (both Jews) wrote the “Communist Manifesto” for the purpose of inspiring violent revolution everywhere in order to bring about this Utopian dream.

 

[Add. Image — Friedrich Engels (left) and Karl Marx.]

 

Marxist theory called for the revolutionary overthrow of the bourgeoisie, followed by a preparatory stage of socialism, alternatively called “The Dictatorship of the Proletariat.” Pure Communism, the end goal of Marxist Socialism, would then follow, and would be the theoretical state of “statelessness” in which an un-governed, classless society would live in perfect order.

 

The remarkable thing about this ideology from the perspective of today, or perhaps any day, is that it was so clearly and obviously stupid that it simply astounds the imagination that intelligent, educated people could have believed in it. But belief in Communism was not limited to these so-called “intellectuals.” Marxist Communism became the Jewish secular religion. Communism was a Jewish invention, which sprang naturally out of the collectivist Jewish culture, and was generally accepted at some level by almost all Jews worldwide. Obviously there were non-Jewish adherents to Communism, but Communism was a Jewish movement, created by Jews, led by Jews and propagated by Jews. It would be inaccurate to aver that all Jews accepted Communism as a belief system, but surely the vast majority did.

 

[Add. Image — (left to right) Marx, Angels, Lenin and Stalin.]

 

The obvious flaw in Communist ideology was that it defied human nature. Moreover, it defied common sense. Man simply does not behave in the way required for Communism to work. Yet, Lenin, Trotsky, and all the other Jewish, Marxist revolutionary thinkers and leaders were convinced that they could implement it. The key to doing so, they said, was to kill off the bourgeoisie (“bourgeoisie”, for their purposes, was an all inclusive term meaning all those above the peasant and proletariat, or working, class). In the actual application of Communism, they never got beyond the “socialism” stage, or the dictatorship of a Jewish elite. The “dictatorship of the proletariat” never occurred.

 

Jews considered themselves to be God’s chosen people, and innately superior to the Gentiles they lived amongst, yet, over the centuries, they had long been held down, or even expelled by the Gentiles. For that reason, among others, they nourished an intense burning sense of injustice and resentment against Gentiles of all classes, but in particular, the bourgeoisie who had lorded over them. They also despised the ignorant, superstitious, fervently religious Russian peasants, who despised them in return, and who had carried out repeated pogroms against Jews. But now in control of the state, the Jews treated the ethnic Russians as a conquered people, against whom they intended to take their revenge. Vengeance seeking is a basic imperative of Jewish culture:

You kill my cousin; I’ll kill your cousin!

 

Their goal was to remake Russia into the Marxist Utopia they had long dreamed about. These ideological Bolshevik Jews saw the vast population of Russian peasants and proletarians as a malleable, culture-less mass who could be molded into a “New Soviet Man,” through which they could bring about their dream of a communist “heaven on earth,” provided, that is, that those wherein the traditional Russian culture resided ― the monarchy, the aristocracy, the educated, the Orthodox Church (collectively, the bourgeoisie) ― could be eliminated. The Jews were not Russians, but an alien people, and they felt no kinship nor compassion for the Russians they intended to kill. They felt only hatred.

 

[Add. Image — 1931 demolition of the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in Moscow.]

 

In order to create their Utopia in Russia, their first task was to destroy the culture that already existed, including Christianity. To do this, these Bolshevik Jews unleashed the greatest bloodbath in history, far exceeding anything the Mongols did, and a thousand times worse than anything the notorious Nazis did. As an illustration of the bloody mindedness of these Bolshevik Jews, Grigory Zinoviev (real name Hirsch Apfelbaum), as head of the Communist International, wrote in an article in the “Drasnaya Gazeta” in Moscow, September 1, 1918:

We will make our hearts cruel, hard and immovable, so that no mercy will enter them, and so that they will not quiver at the sight of a sea of enemy blood. We will let loose the floodgates of that sea. Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies in scores of hundreds. Let them be thousands; let them drown themselves in their own blood! For the blood of Lenin [shot but survived in 1918] and Uritsky [shot and killed in 1918], Zinoviev [shot but lived in 1919] and Voladarsky [shot and killed in 1918], let there be floods of blood of the bourgeois ― more blood! As much as possible.

 

[Add. Image — Grigory Zinoviev – Bolshevik revolutionary and a Soviet Communist politician. He was  the longtime head of the Communist International.]

 

These Bolshevik Jews murdered upwards of 40 million ethnic, Christian Russians. The precise number will never be known. This was so horrific that it terrified the traditional ruling classes in the rest of Europe, as they saw the possibility of the same thing happening in their own countries. This was especially true in Germany, still unstable as the result of losing the war, but also with the largest Communist party outside of Russia. The German Communist party [leadership] was 78% Jewish. Is there any wonder that Hitler and the National Socialists saw Jews and Communism as the mortal enemy of Germany and Western, Christian civilization?

 

The wonder is that Britain and the United States did not. By allying themselves with the Jewish-led anti-Christian, atheistic, Communist Soviet Union to destroy Christian Germany, Britain and the United States must bear the burden of responsibility for the decline of Western Civilization following World War II.

 

 

 

 

[END of Part 10]

 

______________________________

 

 

PDF Notes

Total words = 5,408

* Total pages = 31

*Total images = 10

 

*Note: Images not in original book are indicated as “Add. image” (Additional image).

*Text in [square brackets] is not part of the original book.

*Special thanks to reader “mblaine” for providing the text for this book.

======================================

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (2.1 MB).

 

The Myth of Germany Villainy – Part 10 – National Socialm vs Communism

 

 


 

 

[Click image to enlarge]

 

Click on a link to go to another part:

 

Part 01 — Cover text; About the Author; Preface; Chapter 1: The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation

Part 02 — Chapter 2: Aftermath of the War in Germany

Part 03 — Chapter 3: The Jewish Factor in the War

Part 04 — Chapter 4: The Russian Revolution of 1917

Part 05 — Chapter 5: The Red Terror

Part 06 — Chapter 6: The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads Throughout Europe

Part 07 — Chapter 7: The Nation of Israel

Part 08 — Chapter 8: Jews in Weimar Germany

Part 09 — Chapter 9: Hitler and National Socialists Rise to Power

Part 10 — Chapter 10: National Socialism vs Communism

Part 11 — Chapter 11: Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany

Part 12 — Chapter 12: The Nazis and the Zionists Actually Work Together for Jewish Emigration out of Germany

Part 13 — Chapter 13: Life in Germany Under Hitler

Part 14 — Chapter 14 & 15: Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory; The 1936 Olympics

Part 15 — Chapter 16: Anschluss” The Unification of Austria and Germany

Part 16 – Chapter 17: Germany Annexes the Sudetenland

Part 17 – Chapter 18: War with Poland

Part 18 – Chapter 19: The Phony War

Part 19 – Chapter 20: Germany invades France – The Phony War Ends

Part 20 – Chapter 21: The Allied Goal? Destruction of Germany!

Part 21 – Chapter 22: Germany as Victim

 

 

See also:

 

The Myth of German Villainy: Author Ben Bradberry Interview — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

_____________________

 

 

 

Version History

 

Version 2: Mar 24, 2020 — Re-uploaded images and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version.

 

Version 1Nov 2, 2016 — Created post. Added PDF for download.

This entry was posted in Alfred Rosenberg, America, anti-communism, Aryan, Banksters, Benton L. Bradberry, Bk - The Myth of German Villainy, Christainity, Communism, Europe, Europe - Eastern, Friedrich Engels, Germany, Hitler, International Finance, Jew World Order, Jewish Bolsheviks, Jewish Problem/Question, Jews, Jews - Hostile Elite, Jews - Lying, Karl Marx, Marxism, Marxist Utopia, Media - jewish domination, National Socialism, National Socialism - Philosphy, Propaganda - Anti-German, Red Terror, Russia, Russian Revolution 1917, Third Reich, Treaty of Versailles, White Nationalism, WW I, WW II, Zionism. Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Book – The Myth of German Villainy – Part 10 – National Socialism vs Communism

  1. John Engelman says:

    Books absolving the Nazis are motivated by hostility for Jews. Hostility for Jews is motivated by jealousy of Jewish intelligence and prosperity.

  2. The Man from Mars says:

    @Engleman(aka Angles)

    Hatred for White men by jews is because of a guilty jewry knowing their ill gain, why pray tell does the Jew follow the White Man wherever he should go just like the negro? I have seen you claim the jew(son of satan that he is) is better than the White, why? Because he has money? So what! Does being wealthy give some sort of moral leeway to a person’s actions? I suppose it makes all those African dictators very moral and wise men, most assuredly.

    You also speak of intellegence and yet… A jew will never hold a candle to what the White man has created, built, thought; he shall never love as deeply or craft arts of beauty as the White Man has painted, sculpted, wrote, sung, etc. This despite the jew’s so called IQ ignoring a vast variety of other indicators of a succesful race.

    It is quite easy to poopoo opposition but have you ever considered that mabye just maybe… there is something to accusations against jewry?

    • John Engelman says:

      Jews are no more than one percent of the world’s population. They have won one fifth of the Nobel Prizes. Their contributions to Western civilization are far out of proportion to their numbers.

  3. The Man from Mars says:

    @Angles
    They are also highly overepresented in financial scams, their so called contributions, are on net, highly negative for “Western Civilization” and anything positive that the jews may have done was only possible through the minds of the White Man and his laboring towards a better understanding of the world and its workings.

    Do you know how Jews rose to such positions? Nepotism and control over the specie which happened to be gold. They got really rich because a gentile normally only works by himself, the jew normally works with his kin to the detriment of all others.

    PS I noticed you didnt touch upon my points in the earlier post, please do so next time if you will.

    PPS I now Obama and a few other less than reputable people recieved Nobel Prizes, so in my estimation the Nobel Prize isnt such a great indicator of, well, greatness

    • John Engelman says:

      Jews achieved their prominence in finance, journalism, the academy, and in the popular culture with superior talent. These achievements were made despite persecution and discrimination.

  4. The Man from Mars says:

    @Angles

    What superior talent? Coin clipping? Inurance fraud? Fractional reserve lending? Lying?

    The only persecution those jews suffered was in their own head. For if gentiles saw multiple jews commit wicked acts they responded, sort of like lynchings with the negro murder, thief, etc.

    But jews are very adept at discriminating between gentile and jew, if a jew can he will usually hire a fellow jew, rather than a gentile as able or better than the jew he hired.

    The only reason Jewry sits on the seats of power today is their total control of specie of currency.

    Else ridle me this how come jews before a few hundred years ago gave to the world not one invention, art, philosphy, great statesman, warrior, or other person of note except criminals?

  5. Pingback: Why I Sympathize With National Socialist Germany – aladdinsmiraclelamp

  6. Pingback: Book - The Myth of German Villainy - Part 04 - The Russian Revolution of 1917 - katana17katana17

  7. Pingback: Book - The Myth of German Villainy - Part 02 - Aftermath of the War in Germany - katana17katana17

  8. Pingback: Book - The Myth of German Villainy by Benton Bradberry - Part 01 - katana17katana17

  9. Pingback: Book - The Myth of German Villainy - Part 16 - Germany Annexes the Sudetenland - katana17katana17

  10. Pingback: Book - The Myth of German Villainy - Part 17 - War with Poland - katana17katana17

  11. Pingback: Book - The Myth of German Villainy - Part 15 - “Anschluss” The Unification of Austria and Germany - katana17katana17

  12. Pingback: Book - The Myth of German Villainy - Part 22 (last) - Winners and Losers - katana17katana17

  13. Pingback: Book - The Myth of German Villainy - Part 21 - Germany as Victim - katana17katana17

  14. Pingback: Book - The Myth of German Villainy - Part 03 - The Jewish Factor in the War - katana17katana17

  15. Pingback: Book - The Myth of German Villainy - Part 05 - The Red Terror - katana17katana17

  16. Pingback: Book - The Myth of German Villainy - Part 06 - The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads throughout Europe - katana17katana17

  17. Pingback: Book - The Myth of German Villainy - Part 07 - The Nation of Israel - katana17katana17

  18. Pingback: Book - The Myth of German Villainy - Part 08 - Jews in Weimar Germany - katana17katana17

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.