[Millennial Woes, a Scottish vlogger, discusses his recent doxing by the Main Sewer Media, Hope Not Hate and some low-life anti-fa types  — KATANA.]

_______________________

YouTube Description

The story of the attack on me by the Daily Record (including ace reporter Alan McEwen), the Scottish Sunday Herald, and other low-brow newspapers, done in collusion with Hope Not Hate and some gormless Scottish antifa.

Part 1: 0:00:00
Part 2: 0:03:57
Part 3: 0:28:02
Part 4: 0:53:48
Part 5: 1:08:42
Part 6: 1:16:53

[This channel is my livelihood. Donations to www.paypal.me/MillennialWoes are appreciated, as are pledges on www.patreon.com/MillennialWoes and bitcoin donations to 1743rc3jnBaYL3piL9eeEHqbrXrroZLVWW. Thank you.]

[This video is not intended to condone violence or hate.]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AhMPTFRwPM

A Woes By Any Other Name

TRANSCRIPT

[00:00]

Part One: Introduction

Hello. This video is going to describe what has happened to yours truly over the last few weeks. And it’s going to be quite an involved story, I’m afraid. I’ll try to be brief, but we know that, I don’t tend to do that successfully very often. Nonetheless, I will try. But before I get into what happened, first things first. I’ve got a few messages from various people. To my supporters. These are the most important people. Thank you very, very much for the help you’ve given me over the last seven days! Thank you for the donations which have been very generous and numerous and certainly have made my immediate future more navigable than it was before. And also, thank you for the countless messages of moral support and encouragement that you’ve sent. Well, … It would have been pretty awful without them, honestly. I would have felt quite alone without that, so thank you!

To the public. I do not hate. This is contrary to what you will have read about me in the press. These ridiculous articles that are being printed, or have been printed. I want to give you my side of things. You need to be able to see me as I am and not as these hack journalists portray me. I do not hate. I do not spew hate on this channel, or anywhere else. And I don’t, I don’t encourage hate either. And certainly not deliberately. I’ve no interest in doing that. I never have had any interest in doing that.

I mean, we’ll get into that later. Anyway, to the police, because I know that I’ve probably been reported for “hate speech” in the last few days. I mean, I expect so.

So on to the police. Honestly, it seems to me [laughing] that you have better things to do than investigate someone like me. I’m just a guy talking about the world and trying to do so honestly. And that’s all I’ve ever been doing on this channel. But, I know that you have to follow up on things. So, maybe I’ll be speaking to you soon.

To the Scottish Government and judiciary. I don’t believe I’ve said anything illegal on my channel and I don’t think it’s “hate speech”. That is just an infantile category, of course. But I don’t think that what I do qualifies as “hate speech”. However, if you do put me on trial —and this is not threat. This is just what I think is likely to happen. If you do put me on trial for “hate speech” I think it will backfire hugely on yourselves, for various reasons. I have international support. Tens of thousands of people I know will rally around and it will just look ridiculous to put someone like me on trial. However, I’ll go into in more detail in a future video. For now, let’s concentrate on what has happened recently in the last two weeks.

Part Two: What Happened

OK, so we’ll start with our rundown, a chronological rundown of what happened, starting from the 19th of November last year, 2016. And with the NPI [National Policy Institute] gathering in Washington DC. This is my, the third conference I’d attended and everything was going just swimmingly — up until the end of Richard Spencer’s speech, when some people gave Nazi salutes in the audience.

Now, I’ve talked about this before on the channel, briefly, but I think it’s worth emphasizing there were about, at least, three hundred people there, I believe, at that conference. And from the footage it looks like about four people did these salutes. I don’t know who they were. I saw one of them bragging about it on a forum.

[05:00]

I don’t know if they were leftist infiltrators. I don’t know if they were just young men drunk and showing bravado. And I don’t know if they were genuine neo Nazis. But what I do know is that they did not represent the majority of that audience, or anything like it. They’re a tiny minority.

And certainly it’s irritating when people do something like that and I get associated with it. That’s, it’s annoying! It’s inconvenient. Of course, it’s worth saying that our opponents on the opposite side of the spectrum do not have any fear about being associated with the extremists. Indeed, well some people who have attacked me recently, are proper Marxists and they have no shame about that, whatsoever.

But, let’s leave that aside, the point is that “Heilgate”, as it has come to be known, clearly sow the seeds for trouble later on. I had premonitions about NPI. I thought something was going to happen at NPI. And as it turns out I was absolutely right. Three days after the conference, on the 22nd of November, some Leftie blog in Edinburgh, … Well I don’t know if it’s in Edinburgh, or Glasgow. Somewhere in Scotland. This Marxist blog, “A Thousand Flowers”

Now you can talk about the genesis of that name. The irony is delicious! Chairman Mao [laughing loudly] for God’s sake! Chairman Mao! And, in fact, I don’t really care to, it would take too long part. The point is, Chairman Mao asked for people to give their opinions, their criticisms of his regime. And then when those criticisms were too harsh, too inconvenient, he turned against it and halted the campaign and imprisoned people!

And I thought, now when I read about that, I had heard the phrase “One Hundred Flowers” that was what it was called, this campaign. I’ve heard of before, but didn’t really know what it was. And when I Googled this I thought, “Fuck me!” you know, this total lack of self reflection! Which I’ve come to really associate with the Left. Perfectly example provided by Chairman Mao! When things go bad, … In fact, first of all you say you’re going to do this, but then, when it goes bad you just renege on that earlier promise. And then also you don’t, you know, you are not honest with the people and you’re honest with yourself either. Because you told yourself that you’re being open minded, but you weren’t at all. And you told yourself you’re being benign, or that you were a benign person. But, in fact, there’s venom in you! There’s hatred in you!

So, the fact that these people would choose the name, “A Thousand Flowers” for their blog, I can’t help, but think it’s significant. Are they hoping to be ten times as self deluded as Chairman Mao?

Anyway. So, three days after NPI, these people, this blog published a post about me, because I had spoken at that conference. It’s worth saying that the speech I gave was not really, it certainly wasn’t political, it was philosophical and spiritual. But, of course, that’s of no importance to these people. I’m just evil to them! So, I have to be vilified.

And in that blog post they asked people to sell me out. They asked people to contact them with my details. Much as “Hope Not Hate”, has done eighteen months earlier, it’s worth saying. I did a video about that at the time. There’s no point going into it now. Now that was on the 22nd. The very next day, the 23rd, “The Daily Record” a Scottish tabloid, gutter newspaper, published an article. It was not on a prominent article, I think it was towards the back of the paper. And it was titled:

“Who is this mystery Scottish racist who spoke at a rally where White supremacists gave Nazi salutes in support of Donald Trump!”

And then it continued:

“The vile blogger, believed to be from Edinburgh, gave a speech at a White Nationalist conference in Washington DC that has sparked a political firestorm!”

And you can see them sensationalizing here. But, I also have to point out that the use of this word “vile” which is repeated over and over in The Daily Record coverage of me. Enough! I’m not going to go into that.

[10:00]

This article also asked people to e-mail, or phone the Daily Record with my information. Again, they were trying to get people to sell me out. And we’ll get into that later, but I just do want to ask, just drop the question in here. Why is it important? Why am I, why is my name important? Why is my age important? Why is my address important? Why is any of this important? Why do they want these details? Is it, because knowing these details will help them to understand my ideas? Why? Will it help the public to understand my ideas? How? There’s no reason for them to want this information.

I said the same thing when Hope Not Hate tried to find me. It’s just ridiculous! It’s childish! Anyway, the print version of that article, which appeared the next day, I think, had the headline twisted! “Can you identify a racist scum bag?” Again, that this puerile, childish, spiteful, ignorant, close minded, yeah hateful, I think has the word, prose is not worthy of a national newspaper. And is not worthy of the British public. It’s insulting to everyone and well, as for me, I think calling me a racist scum bag is just ludicrous!

I think it’s absurd!

Anyway, that was going on and I was still in America at this stage. I think I came back, I should say I went back to Scotland about two weeks later. And it was decided as a result of all this new controversy, — which I have not sought, I had not wanted and they said later that sought, that I got notoriety, or I won notoriety — I had never, I’ve never wanted notoriety!

But anyway, as a result of all this exposure, it was decided that I would move out, because I’ve been living with my dad. I decided that I would move out and get a flat of my own. It’s worth, it’s important to point out that my dad does not share my views. None of my relatives are very political, at all! And we agreed that it wasn’t fair for him, or them, to be associated with my views.

So, I was going to move out. And, if you’re wondering why I at the age of thirty four was still living with my father, that’s gone into my channel long, long ago. So I was going to move out, but before I could do that I had the Millennial, the “Christmas Hangeouts” on my channel to organize and host. So, things had to be delayed. I couldn’t do it. However, by the fifth of January I was well on the way to finding a place of my own and I was probably about three weeks away from moving out.

But then the next thing happened. On Thursday the fifth of January, 2017. There was a knock at the door at my house — my dad’s house — and I went and answered it. And I he’s twenty five or twenty six.

I can’t remember what he said. I think he said, “Hello. Collin?”

And I said, “Yes?”

And he said:

“We’re here to talk to you. We’re here from the National. We want to talk to you about Millennial Woes.”

And I said — this was the first time, I mean, this was, immediately I knew, OK. I’ve been found. That’s it!

And I said:

“I don’t want to talk to you about that. I’ve got nothing to say about that.”

And then he started talking, started saying something else. And then I noticed a car parked nearby with the window rolled down. And I said to him, “Is that guy taking photos?” I think it was a guy. I think there was a guy in there taking photos. And I said that to the journalist and he paused for a second and then said, “Yes”. And I looked him right in the eye and I said, “Go away!” And I was angry. I was disgusted!

We’ll get into that later.

[15:00]

So, he began, he actually looked scared, I have to say. He looked scared. I don’t kn why. And he began turning away and I just closed the door. So that was that. And then, what happened then? What happened then? Oh yeah. Nothing happened the next day. And then on what must have been the Saturday, Saturday the seventh of January. It was decided that I should just leave. I should just leave, because they’re going to keep coming now and indeed they did. I arranged my flight, my escape from Britain that day, on Saturday.

And then, at about noon, there was another knock at the door and I knew it was going to be a journalist, so I didn’t answer. And I have to say, this is the first time I’ve been in this kind of situation and I didn’t seek it out. I didn’t want it. I don’t really, I don’t want fame.

I’m happy just working on YouTube. And to suddenly be thrown into this position where you’re having to deal, where you’re being publicly broadcast, like to everyone, nationwide, not just by an internet YouTube channel, but for a national newspaper. To be thrust into the public limelight and to have journalists coming to your house knocking on your door and, you know, that they don’t mean you well. You know, that they have malice for you. And to be in that position is rather scary, rather intimidating actually. For the first, … I think if it happened again I would deal with it a hell of a lot better, but it was scary!

It was intimidating because, you know, these people mean you harm. It’s not that they’re going to beat you up, or something, but they think you’re a bad person. That’s the only reason they’re at your house. And so they have come to your house. They’ve come to your sanctuary. You know, your place where you’re safe from the whole world and they have violated that. They have taken that away from you. And, of course, this is the whole point. This is something that the the media have done to people for ever! And it’s disgusting! I mean you would think that they were dealing with really villainous people. People who deserve something like that. People who had committed crimes, you know, violent crimes.

I mean just to emphasis, all I’ve done is say things on YouTube and I’ve gone to three conferences, spoken at three conferences. Anyway, a certainly on a Saturday there was a knock at the door and I knew it was going to be a journalist. So I just ignored it. And then I heard this voice coming round the back. He must have gone round the back of the house, trespassing on my father’s property, it’s worth saying. And he went around the back of the house, down the driveway, I think into the back garden. And I heard him say, what was it? It was a voice of this age, youngish guy, middle class, but not well spoken.

I think he said something like:

“Colin! Mr. Robertson! Are you there? Want to ask you a few questions!”

And I thought:

“For fuck’s sake!”

And, of course, I just, I didn’t do anything. I was just sitting there waiting for him to fuck off! And eventually he did.

I don’t know how long he stayed for. But eventually he left.

I think this was Liam. Let’s say, Liam, from the “A Thousand Flowers” blog.

I don’t know. I don’t know for sure. It might have been someone else from that blog. Or it might have been someone, … I don’t know. I think they did say that they had gone to the house that day. And he said, “We want to ask you a few questions.” So maybe it was multiple people from that blog. I don’t know.

Anyway, at four thirty that day, the Saturday, I decided to email the National telling them that if they published the photos that they’d taken there on the Thursday, or my name or address, or anything like that, I would take a legal action against them.

[20:06]

It is interesting that three hours after that e-mail was sent, “A Thousand Flowers” doxed me by publishing the article. So I suspect that there was some communication between – and I don’t, can’t prove that. It’s just this supposition. I think that the National had communicated with “A Thousand Flowers” saying:

“He’s threatened legal action against us, so we won’t publish it, so you go ahead and break the story, and that will circumvent normal journalistic rules and laws”.

I think that’s maybe what happened, but I don’t know, and I’ll never be able to prove it.

So they published that at 7.30 p.m., roundabout. And one thing they did that did amuse me actually, about that article on “A Thousand Flowers”. It said:

“After an extensive investigation we can reveal who Millennial Woes is”.

And I have to say, you know, I don’t know these people personally, obviously, I’ve never met them, or anything, but I suspect that this is all self-aggrandisement. I don’t think that they had launched any “extensive investigation”. I doubt that they’d done anything at all. I think what happened was that simply, someone who knows me in real life – and I also I think I know who it was as well – but I think someone who knows me in real life sold me out. I think they probably contacted the National, who then gave the information to “A Thousand Flowers”.

So, I think that’s what happened. I don’t think there was any extensive investigation by these these numpties at “A Thousand Flowers”. So, that’s what I think happened. I think someone contacted the National to sell me out, the National came to my house, but they were then ordered by me not to reveal the information, so they passed it on to “A Thousand Flowers”, who published the information and then passed on to the Daily Record. Which I think also happened in November. I think it was “A Thousand Flowers” first, and then immediately the next day the Daily Record.

So, I think there’s communication between them as well, especially, because the guy who runs “A Thousand Flowers” has previously written articles for The Daily Record. So, there we go. I just need to emphasize this, I can’t prove it! I don’t know for sure! It’s just what I suspect. I think there was collusion going on between the official press and anti-fa.

OK. So that was the Saturday. I was doxed on that Saturday at 7.30. And then on the Sunday at about two p.m. – oh, well, before that my mother phoned to say that people had been round at her house. And they’d asked about me and she just closed the door in their face, which was rather amusing. But then I knew that they were bound to be coming round to my dad’s house. And, of course, just a few minutes later they did. And, you know, what it was? Someone knocking at the front door; but not in a normal way. Not in a warm way. It was three ominous thumps on the door like this: [knocks on table three times] . Like that. And I didn’t know who they were. I heard voices, and then they began talking to my neighbours, and it sounded like it was multiple men, that I didn’t know – it was difficult to tell. I looked outside and I saw the car.

And there was a fat old guy in there looking at his phone and – he never seemed to put his phone down – and I looked out about ten minutes later and he was still there, and his colleague was still talking to my neighbours. It was really weird, and eventually they drove away. But then they came back, and then at that point I called the police, because I thought this is scary. Frankly, this is intimidating! And I’ll admit I was intimidated. Well done!

So, I called the police. Because I didn’t know if these were the same people who’d come the two times before – I didn’t know who they were. So, the police arrived and I had, oddly enough, I had spoken to both of them. It was two policemen, and I knew them both, because they had been at my house before, but we’ll get to that later.

[25:01]

They ended up going outside and speaking to the two – oh yeah, because that was it, the men had gone away by the time the police arrived, the men had gone away, again.

So then the police came in and spoke to me, but then the men came back for a third time and they were outside. One of the policemen went out and spoke to them, then both of the police went and spoke to them, and they’re talking to them for ages. It was like forty minutes or something. They ID’d the two men, it turned out that they were Daily Record journalists, and they told the police that there was going to be an article about me published the very next day.

So, there was the fat old guy. I don’t know who he was. Maybe it was a photographer. Maybe he was hoping to get some photos of me. I don’t know. And then there was a younger guy. He was very tall. And I think he was Alan McEwen, but I don’t know, it was difficult to see. And that was really it. The men left after quite a long time. They’d spoken to several of my neighbours, and they had tried to frighten me. And it succeeded, honestly – I’ll be honest – and I think they had wanted to, well, do what journalists do. Do what unscrupulous, ruthless journalists have always done, which is to get someone on their doorstep, ask them a bunch of awkward questions, take photos of them looking scared etcetera.

So, they didn’t get what they wanted, but they did at least get to manipulate my neighbours and inconvenience two police officers. And then they got a few quotes for their story, and then eventually they left.

And then, later that night, I left my house. I left that room. I was packing up the computer, I was packing up everything — frantically — and I was spirited away from that room where I created Millennial Woes!

All right, in the next segment, I will talk about the articles that were published the next day and in the subsequent days.

Part Three: The Newspaper Articles

I could dissect the various articles that were written, but I don’t think there’s much point. They are simply disingenuous, hateful hate pieces, and they’re misleading, they’re manipulative; they’re awful! You know, I was never really – I had heard the phrase the gutter press – but I didn’t really know the reality of it until now. And, well, it’s sickening! Just sickening! The way they have portrayed me; the way they’ve lied about me, and picked out certain things, exaggerated them, given them undue emphasis, lied by omission, twisted certain things; it’s just awful!

And now – but I won’t go through dissecting them, but I will just pick up on certain things that I think especially relevant.

So, the next day, Monday – this is the ninth of January 2017 – the piece was published. And this was written by the same journalist who wrote the previous Daily Record piece in November, Allen McKeown. And it was titled “Meet the Vile Vlogger” – the word “vile” again, they are very fond of that – “Meet the vile vlogger, his racist rants have made him a global internet sensation!”. Now, the phrase, “a global internet sensation” is, you know, – I’d like, you know, in a way: I don’t seek fame, but it would be kind of nice to be “a global internet sensation”: It would feed my ego – but the truth is that’s ludicrous exaggeration. My channel had fewer than twenty thousand subscribers at this time, when this was published. And that is… I’m not a global internet sensation and I’m a – I’m still a very long way from being that, so they’re sort of over egging my impact; my reach and my fame, or my infamy. So it’s absurd!

[30:21] 

But anyway, it’s worth pointing out that this was not only, … It had a lot more prominence than the previous Daily Record article in November. This was a front page article! I was, … My face was plastered over the front page of The Daily Record.

Ironically enough, next an article about a British woman who was accused of adultery by her violent Muslim husband in Bahrain and had successfully got a quickie divorce from him. I mean, for God’s sake! Anyway, … Let’s just ignore that.

So, the subtitle of this article was:

“The 34 year old extremist YouTube star is a jobless ex-student who films his hate filled videos from a bedroom at his dad’s!”

Now, a few things. “Extremist!” Who’s the extremist? You know, I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again. All I want is a safe society for my people, for my ethnic group. That’s just what everyone else in the whole fucking world wants, and had, up until very recently! You know, I mean, we demonized the phrase, “Britain for the British!” Why? What’s so bad about that? And what so extreme about that? It’s the way we evolved, it’s the way we are! Every other ethnic group wants this and most of them have it.

So what’s wrong with us wanting it? What’s wrong, what’s so extreme about me wanting that? That’s all I want.

Now, I think the extremists are the ones, I think the situation is extreme! You know, this drastic mixing of global populations that’s going on just now. I think that’s a very extreme phenomenon! And I think the extremists are the ones who are perfectly happy with this radical change that’s going on. I think they’re the extremists. I think I’m just, … All I want is what our grandparents had and took for granted! Is that really extreme?

I don’t understand how that’s extreme!

I don’t want a totalitarian dictatorship. I don’t want goose stepping up and down the streets. And I don’t want any of these things that we associate with extremists. I don’t want violence, I don’t want bombs, I don’t want terrorism.

Am I an extremist?

I don’t understand.

That’s my first objection to this ludicrous subtitle. The second one is the word “jobless” here. It describes me as a jobless, well the editor, whoever it was who came up with this. Describes me as a “jobless ex-student”. So, let’s deal with that, “jobless”. I’m not jobless! And the Millennial Woes project is my job. It’s my full time job! It’s what I do all the time. And if my channel gets taken down, by the way, Millennial Woes will still be my job. I’ll simply migrate onto other platforms, like many people have done before me.

This is my life and it’s my job. And I am certainly not jobless. But that’s just completely dishonest to describe me in that way.

And then the other one, “ex-student”. [laughing heartily] I mean, that’s one of these phrases that doesn’t actually mean much at all, if anything. But it’s just designed to sound bad! And the fact of the matter is, anyone who was once a student is an “ex” student. Now I’m used to be a student, then I graduated. Now I’m an ex-student. Though, I don’t think there’s anything to hate there. I don’t think there’s anything laughable about that! So, what are they playing at? This manipulative nonsense!

And then finally, “his hate filled videos”.

What the hell! [laughing] You know, maybe I sound hateful in this video, because I’m talking about people who have personally attacked me, but I don’t think I’m genuinely, … In fact, I’m sure I’m not hateful. I think that’s just a lie!

It’s so manipulative, it’s so, … It’s such a tainted version of, … A tainted representation of my channel and my work to say that it’s hateful. It’s dishonest, just dishonest! I think it’s bullshit to say that I’m hateful and to say that my work is somehow motivated by hate, or driven by hate.

[35:09]

No, I don’t accept that at all. It certainly goes on, Robertson, that is me Colin Robertson, admits being reported to police over his videos. Now again, quite frankly, this is just a lie! They are just lying! I do not admit to being reported to police. It wouldn’t surprise me if I’ve been reported to police, because as I said, because of the very sensitive climate that we live in now. But, I have no idea whether I’ve ever been reported to the police. It seems likely to me, but I don’t know whether it’s happened. And therefore why would I admit to it having happened?

I’ve never admitted to it! I don’t know that it’s happened. So they’re saying that I’ve admitted to being reported to the police. No! No!

And so, that’s what I wanted to talk about, the article. And I want to also, … Oh yeah, I said that neighbors said they’d seen police officers call at his home late last year. It’s another quote:

“Neighbor said they’d seen police officers call at his home, late last year.”

Now, I think it’s definitely worth going into this, because I think it is very significant. It wasn’t late last year, it was at the end of June. It was on the day of the Brexit referendum funnily enough. I had a hangout in the morning and then had a hangout at night and in between that and then after the second hangout as well, I was dealing with something. I was dealing with something very serious. Which required the attendance of the police at my house. So I’m going to tell you what it was. Just to show you how malicious and disgusting it is that they mentioned this.

The truth is, that the police have indeed known who I am, since at least at the end of June and the Brexit referendum day at the latest. And maybe before then, but definitely since then. And I know this, because I doxed myself to the police on that day, June last year. And I did this in order to save a man’s life! How about that?

Somebody contacted me through the channel. He was very depressed. I tried to counsel him, that was a few weeks before. Then he contacted me on that day, telling me that he was going to kill himself. I tried to talk him out of it. He was determined he was going to kill himself.

So I contacted the police. They came to my house and interviewed me. They asked me how I got in touch, or how this guy had got in touch with me. I told them. I told them about the channel. They asked what it was called. I told them what it was called. So they knew from that point on, Colin Robertson, Millennial Woes at that address. And I then stayed up all night. Oh well, I did the second hangout about Brexit. And then the police arrived again at my house and we stayed up all night with police sitting next to me in the living room. And we were emailing this guy, trying to talk him out of it. And in the process of this they were able to locate him and save his life. Save him in time. He did actually attempt suicide. But, because of my help — I’m not bragging here, it’s just the facts of the matter — because of my help they were able to get him in time to save his life. And that is why there were police and my house.

So, you could say that there were police at my house, because of my channel, back then. But the truth is without my channel that man would now be dead!

So, I can legitimately say that I have saved lives with my channel and I wonder what Alan McEwen can say that he has achieved, with his work?

So! It really is fucking infuriating! And that’s why there were police outside my house. Not, because I’ve done something bad! It was because I was trying to save someone’s life!

[40:00]

As I say, ever since that day, they’ve known who I am, where I lived. So if they’d wanted to contact me they could have at any time and they haven’t. And also those two police who came and interviewed me about the man, they were the two police who came, … If go when the Daily Record journalists were outside my house. That’s how I knew them.

Anyway, last Monday, last week, Monday the ninth. That was the day I left Britain so as to avoid any further encounters with shitty, immoral journalists! And frankly also, because I felt there was a lynch mob coming after me! And that certainly seemed to be what the newspapers were trying to promote, trying to encourage. I no longer felt safe in Linlithgow. I no longer felt safe in Edinburgh, and since I’m not a physical guy, I thought it was best not to risk it. I’m not going to become a martyr, not pointlessly, not just like that.

And then once I reached my destination, I made a video, “Fugitive Woes” explaining the situation and asking for donations. And also saying that it might be the last video I uploaded to the channel. And I thought it was likely that the channel may get taken down.

And I also thought it was likely that I would be a reported for hate speech! Just all these SJW’s, all these antifas. And so I thought, I’m probably going to be, I might well be in court, sometime soon And so, if so, I’m going to need money. And before that I’m going to need money to move around, because if antifa is going to pursue me, then — and people will put me up, but only for so long — so I’m going to have to move between different places. I needed money and that’s why I asked for donations. That’s why I “begged” for donations, in the words of the Daily Record!

Now that was two days later. The next day, the tenth, the Daily Record put out their second article. This time anonymously. And can I just point out, the disgusting, laughable hypocrisy of boasting about “unmasking” someone and not even having the balls to use your own name! Because he done it before, the previous article was done by Alan McEwen, this one was anonymous Record reporter. Maybe it was McEwen who wrote it, maybe not. We’ll never know. He was anonymous. And this one of was titled “Vile vlogger” remember “vile”, I think this is the third time, the third time they described me as “vile”!

“Vile vlogger, Colin Robertson could face police probe over racists rants!”

And then:

“We unmasked Collin Robertson yesterday!” [laughing]

“… And Hope Not Hate say that he should face a police investigation.”

Now, this is a bit weird, honestly. I think that they were doing some sort of damage control with this article. I think they realized that they had gone too far with the previous article and therefore they were probably going to need to make me look like even more of a villain. So they, I think, they were trying to encourage people to report it to the police. And they were trying to encourage the police to investigate me. So they were then wouldn’t have to answer for vilifying me. I think that’s what the Daily Record was doing here.

As for Hope Not Hate, who they had apparently consulted about my “villainy” — Hope Not Hate is a joke organization, but we’ll get to them in a few minutes. And then on the next day, and by this time they’d seen my video “Fugitive Woes”, this is on the eleventh of January. Again, an anonymously written article in the Daily Record.

“Vile”, yet again, the fourth time:

“Vile YouTube racist flees to US and puts out the begging bowl after the Record exposes him!”

What fucking heroes you are, Daily Record! What public servants!

[45:00]

And then the subtitle:

“Hate filled vlogger Colin Robertson says he may have posted his last vile rant, …” the fifth time!

And it says:

“... He may have posed as his last vile rant online as he begs supporters for donations to keep him going!”

So, just in that sentence alone at least these two, the words “vile, racist, begging, hate filled, vile” and “begs”. Now, I know that I’m ranting a bit in this video for, I think, understandable reasons, but just thinking about these words here, “vile, racist, begging, hate filled, vile, begs” do you think they’re being fair to me?

Do you think our press are being fair, even handed, open minded?

I mean, I’m angry! Right now, I’m fucking angry at these people! If I sound hate filled, [laughing] I think you can understand why. And if I’m ranting, I think you can understand why.

It’s a campaign of vilification. And I don’t want to sound like I’m feeling sorry for myself. Honestly, this hasn’t been the most fucking pleasant experience!

And I’m sure they’ll probably write another article, once they see this video, they’ll probably, write another article, saying, you know, vile, whatever, does something, moans about us doing our duty as a public, … For, fuck off! Just, just fuck off! This sickens me, sickens me! The tactics, that attitude! The lack of scruples.

Anyway, that’s pretty much all I’m going to say about the Daily Record, I think. Yeah, I think so.

So we’ll move on to some other things.

Oh yeah, there were articles in various other papers. They’ve been spawned by this Daily Record campaign. If I remember correctly, these other peoples were the Daily Mail, the Daily Mirror, The Sun and the Scottish Sunday Herald.

Now I won’t talk about the others, but the Scottish Sunday Herald article is interesting, because, [laughing] well firstly, because it uses a photo taken by The National’s photographer back on the Thursday. The first, the fifth, when he had been, .. I thought, it looks like, … I thought the photographer had been hiding in the car with the window rolled down. But that was off to the left. This photo looks like it was taken right in front of the door. So, I don’t know how that happened maybe he was hiding in the opposite driveway, the opposite side of the road. I don’t know! But it’s a weird, it’s a strange. And also I have to say that the photo off me is so dreadfully bad! It’s a terrible, terrible photo! [laughing] This is kind of thing you just gotta laugh about, you know. It’s, you see this photo of me and I look, … They’ve made me look as bad as possible! I’m sure they’re probably took dozens of photos in those few seconds, that I’ve had the door open. But they’ve chosen the one where I look awful.

It’s amazing that there are photographers, and this is part of the malice of the press, there are photographers whose job it is, to make their subjects look as bad as possible. In this case there’s no way to sugarcoat it. I look like a whale! Coming up for air out of the sea! And it’s terrible. But I don’t know, I mean, I think they must have caught me in middle-sentence, or something. I don’t know. My mouths wide open. I look terrible!

Anyway. It’s one of those things. It does bother one! You know, it’s like, “God, could you have made me look any worse?” And they’re obviously trying to make me, make the public think, “God! What a fat loser!” and “How stupid he looks, how thick he looks!” and so on. Whatever!

So, that was one thing. And the other thing that was interesting about the Herald article is that it had this quote from some guy from Hope Not Hate. And in that it was Joe Mulhall from Hope Not Hate and here’s the quotation.

“If the American stuff hadn’t happened, he would just be an online irrelevance, his YouTube views aren’t massive, but the American stuff makes him of interest,” “It pulls him into the higher leagues of this cesspool of people all pumping this stuff out online.”

[50:01]

And that’s Joe Mulhall. I have to say, if I am just an online irrelevance, then why was your organization trying to hunt me down, trying to get people to sell me out, trying to get my details as far back as eighteen months ago in July, 2015. It’s a bit weird isn’t it? For your organization to do that to someone who’s just an online irrelevance. Of course, the same questions apply as applied with the Daily Record. Why do you want my details? Why do you want my name? Why do you want my age? Why do you all my address? What has that got to do with any of my ideas? What has it got to do with my work? I don’t think it’s got anything to do with my work, or my ideas! I think you’re just trying to intimidate people!

I think that’s why you asked them for my, … Why you asked people to sell me out, eighteen months ago, Hope not Hate. First, I invited you to a debate on the channel where we could talk about our ideas and our disagreements, but you’ve never got in touch, because you don’t do that kind of thing. That would be too reasonable, that would be too human. You’re in the business of intimidation and silencing.

Fucking pieces of shit!

But, to be fair to Joe Mulhall, maybe he doesn’t know about this, that his organization which wanted to hunt me down eighteen months ago.

So, let’s assume that he’s speaking honestly and he sees me as just an online irrelevance. Until I got involved with NPI. Well in that case, I have to say I think he’s rather behind the times. Now, to say that someone is just an online irrelevance, that’s really behind the times when it comes to cultural movements. The fact is they are online now. Everything important happens online nowadays. Apart, obviously, from real life instance when someone gets shot, or whatever. You know, cultural movements happen online.

And I think this is very interesting, because it shows that these people that Hope not Hate and similar organizations are still dinosaurs! I mean, they still think it’s the nineties. And they can vilify nationalists, when they think that Nationalists are just bugs, skinheads marching down a street causing trouble. And, of course, even then they were organizations like Hope not Hate were demonizing them out of hand. But still, I know that those guys were not angels. But the point is that Hope not Hate and similar organizations have not moved forward. They think and they’re desperate to paint people like me, as people like that. Because, if they didn’t do that then they would have to engage with me on an intellectual level. They would have to engage my ideas. And they’ll never do that! Because whenever they do try that, they lose.

So they have to say things like this, what was the phrase, “this cesspool of people pumping this stuff out”.

Whatever! And I just think it’s rather interesting and I think that Hope not Hate are a bunch of dinosaurs and as I get to in the next segment, I think that the mainstream media, the legacy media, the Daily Record and so on, I think they’re just a bunch of dinosaurs as well.

Anyway, we’ll get to that in a wee minute.

Part Four: Thoughts on the Legacy Media

OK, in this segment I’m going to summarize the newspaper coverage. Hopefully get this over with.

All right, so some questions for the media. Of course they’ll never answer them, but still, let’s just put them out as rhetorical questions.

What is the purpose of going to my house? What is the point of that? Do you really think you’re going to get an enlightening calm interview by showing up out of the blue to someone to whom you are clearly vehemently opposed and who you are at trying to set up. And trying to get his neighbors, also poised against him? Do you think you’re going to get some choice “quotes”? Do you think you’re going to get a picture of the real man, the real person by just showing up at the house, out of the blue? Doesn’t seem very likely. I think if you don’t expect to get a good interview from me, or from similar people by showing up at our houses.

I think you do that specifically and solely to intimidate to make them feel unsafe in their own homes. I think that’s why you do it. And that’s what you were hoping to do. I think you’re also going to get some horrible photos of me as well, looking shocked that I’ve been discovered!

[55:23]

So another question for you, because you’re not going to answer them so I’ll move on to the next. What is the purpose of printing my name and address in public? Was the point? It’s my ideas that matter, not me. I am not important at all! And as for my address, what on earth does that have to do with my work, or of my ideas, or anything that I do? Why do people, why do the public need to know where I live? Are you crazy? I mean, that, all you did was, … Let’s just cut to the chase Daily Record and need all these other papers.

The only reason you did that was to endanger me! That’s what I think. And that’s what a lot of people think. I think is what a lot of the public who are not connected to me in any way also think about this. About what you’ve done.

And then, finally another question What is the purpose of talking to my neighbors? And by the way, apparently he, I don’t know whether I said this earlier, but I’m going to include it again. He said to my neighbor, one of them, because I talked to him afterwards. This neighbor, apparently the journalist said to him:

“So, how does it feel to be neighbors with our racist and anti-semite?”

Again, are you expecting, or what are you expecting? And he asked some other questions like that. Are you expecting truth, calm reasoned discussion? I don’t think you are.

I also think you don’t care about how it affects me, or my family, when you say something like that to my neighbors.

And then, as for the articles themselves, it’s difficult to avoid noticing that they don’t contain a single argument against my ideas, or my views, or my opinions. Not a single argument! And there’s just demonization of my ideas, my opinions, and so on. And character assassination of me! Often quite pointed and ruthless, merciless, below the belt! And I shouldn’t be surprised. I’m not really surprised, but I just want to point it out. That they don’t make any attempt to refute my ideas about the world, about people, or anything. Just demonize those ideas and demonize me.

Another point that has to be made about, especially about the tabloids, especially about the Daily Record articles, is the puerile prose! Honestly, it would be marked down if it were an essay at school. It’s appalling! It’s very, very bad writing! Not grammatically, it’s grammatically correct, but the attitude! I mean, if I’d written an essay like that at school I would have been marked down, very much, because, apart from anything else, it shows no lack of interest [sic] whatsoever in the subject, or his ideas, or his reasons for holding them. It’s just a rant! I mean, if you want to see a rant, read one of these articles about me in the Daily Record. They constantly insist that I constantly rant.

If you want to see “hate”, read one of those articles about me. You’ll see hate. They’re appalling, it’s terrible journalism!

It’s also worth pointing out that they’re attacking someone for his ideas, not his deeds. This is something in itself. A person’s moral value being judged not by what he does, but by what he believes. That is an interesting intellectual discussion to be had about that.

I think that, perhaps, someone’s beliefs are a reflection of their core nature, to some extent. But, you can’t afford to judge them in that way, because it’s just, … I mean, everyone has all sorts of beliefs that they may not act upon, or rather they may not want the world to know, because they’re not sure. And they’re not sure about how it fits into a bigger system and so on. So to judge someone by their ideas is very slippery ground, indeed. And that’s why we insist on judging them by their actions. That’s just a prerequisite of living in a sane society.

[60:04]

And then, another point I wanted to make about everything that’s happened, is old media tactics, legacy media tactics. And I use that phrase quite gleefully, the legacy media, because I think these dinosaurs are doomed. We’ll get to that in a minute. Let’s just talk about these tactics.

You have to know the person’s name. You have to publicize their name! You have to publicize their address! And you have to show up at their door, out of the blue, even though this does not in any way aid the discourse! Which is what you’re supposed to be doing. I mean, that’s what I do, public discourse, journalism. That’s public discourse. But these tactics of basically intimidation. They don’t aid that in any way. And I think nowadays we know that, it’s just, it’s so crass and obvious.

I don’t think that the alternative media will go in for that kind of thing, so much. I think it’s very often an other age, a previous age. And everyone can see the cruelty of them. The crassness of then.

And then as for trying to set my neighbors against me. Get me ostracized in my community and ruin my life. And let’s not beat about the bush, that is what they tried to do. The Daily Record has tried to ruin my life! Let’s not split hairs about that. That’s what they’ve tried to do.

And them failed, of course! But that is what they’ve tried to do, nothing short of that. So trying to set my neighbors against me! God! I don’t know what to say! There’s no, … It’s just so obviously, self evidently wrong and immoral. So, yeah! OK.

And then the issue of free speech. They shut down the comment thread under these articles, because they’re getting such bad feedback from the public. Thye shut down the comments threads after trying to shut down me. [laughing] It’s ludicrous! And then, the other thing, witch hunt slash lynch mob. That’s what they were doing! They were engaging in a witch hunt. And it might not be over yet? You know, I mean, I talk in the past tense but they might still continue it. I don’t know. But if they do, I want this video, I want this video to survive on. This video to be evidence of what they’ve done from my point of view. I want my side of the story to be out there. This is why it is essential to do this video. Because these people are expert at manipulation and distortion. And they have tried to instigate a witch hunt and a lynch mob. I think that’s what they were trying to encourage.

I don’t know how much of the public would fall for such a thing. Indeed, I think increasing numbers of the public share my ideas. I really do think that. And so, I don’t know if it would ever happen. Certainly there are some sections of the public who probably would want to lynch me. [laughing] It seems ludicrous, because I know that I haven’t harmed anyone and I haven’t wished anyone harm. But certainly when you read those articles about me you probably, you could be forgiven for thinking that I’m just a piece of shit!

So again, is this responsible journalism? I hardly think so. But! One thing that I must say, for moral reasons and for more pragmatic reasons, I must say that I don’t want these journalists to be harassed. I think these people should be judged by the public and the through the usual channels. Through the proper channel. And I think they’ll be judged harshly.

So, a few other points, about the mainstream media, the legacy media. The circulation of the National newspaper is fifteen thousand, which is minuscule for a paper.

And it’s worth saying that I’ve got more than that. When this broke, I had twenty thousand, or just under. I’ve actually got more subscribers than the National has readers. It’s kind of amazing! The Scottish Sunday Herald, twenty five thousand. And for a national newspaper that is tiny and if you look at the graph, the trend, of all these newspapers, it’s remarkable how they’re just losing readers, hand over over fist.

[64:55]

So that’s, that. Then there’s the Daily Record, one hundred seventy six thousand. Daily Mail, one point five million. Daily Mirror, one point nine million. And The Sun, four and a half million. And all of these, I mean, some of these are big numbers still, but they’re nothing compared to what they were ten years ago. And I think this is very interesting, because some we’ve seen in recent months, several attempts by established media outlets to demonize alternative media outlets. “Fake news”, that phenomenon that they’ve just invented out of thin air.

Then something like this, I mean, you know, I have enough subscribers to rival the National and the Scottish Sunday Herald. I think, I honestly think they’re a bit freaked out. And I think that they can see their doom coming. You know, the Daily Record, I think within five years they might be bankrupt. I don’t know, but it wouldn’t surprise me at all.

I think they can feel it. And so, they’re freaked out and they’re vengeful. And that might explain some of their behavior. But it’s not surprising that people are abandoning them, because of things like this! Things like what’s happened to me! Their treatment of me has been dishonest and malicious and I think that a lot of the readers can tell that. You know, you’ve only got to come and see my channel. It’s blatantly obvious that I’m not the man they’ve described. And I think people are sick of this stuff, you know, the contempt that these newspapers have for their readers.

I think there’s an inevitability to all this, which is kind of comforting.

One final thing about this. I want to emphasize I will not do any interviews with any of these newspapers, or any media outlets, any established mainstream media outlets.

I don’t trust them! I think they are utterly uninterested in being honest! And I think, well as I say, I think they’re malicious. I think they have no scruples. There are other words I could use to describe them, but I will hold back.

The only newspaper I would consider cooperating with would be the local paper in the Linlithgow, because that’s more personal. I don’t like the people from Linlithgow being manipulated, being lied to. Actually, I don’t think it’s been successful, because it’s obvious that the whole the whole town knows by now. And people have contacted and me who haven’t spoken to me years and years, have contacted me. Just offer their support and say that they know the papers are lying about me. You know, people see through this shit! But nonetheless, I would like to set the record straight, so to speak, by speaking to the local Linlithgow paper. That’s the only one I’d consider, and even then I would want a guarantee that they’re going to, well, not misrepresent me, or to do so to a minimal extent.

As for the rest of the newspapers, fuck them! Fuck them all! And their conduct has utterly disgusted me! And I think many other people too. If ever, there are an example of why the legacy media should die a quick death, I think the way they’ve treated me probably qualifies.

Part Five: Thoughts on the Antifa

OK. Now I’m going to talk about the anti-fa [anti-facist] activists who are involved this. The names of these activists, these Marxists, and they are proper Marxists, have been widely disseminated.

I wasn’t responsible for the discovery of their names and I wasn’t responsible for the disseminating of their names, either. Since I’m a nice guy, I’m not even going to name them here, even though the information is widely available. I’m not going to do it. Because I’m above you people! I don’t do the kind of things that you do! And I know you’re watching. I know you’re watching.

So, I’m certainly not going to publish their addresses, or other photographs, or photos of the homes either.

Imagine that? However I will list their first names. Just for the sake of it.

Liam. Lovely Liam. Sarah. Lindsay. Jonathan. Ashley. And fanboy Jammie.

[70:10]

Now, I want to say that the full names, addresses and phone numbers of these people were all found by members of the Alt-Right, within five hours of the article being published on A Thousand Flowers.

That really didn’t take very long. And there was no extensive investigation. There was no months of waiting and searching and hunting. It was all done, it was all managed in a few hours. They knew who you are. And it was rather amusing, a few days later when the Daily Record out, I had a look on Twitter and these numpties, these anti-fa Marxists, were puffing themselves up for doxing me. It was so strange to watch them being all triumphant. And they had no idea that they had already been identified days earlier. They were basking in the glow of self-satisfaction for endangering someone that they disagreed with.

God, it’s sickening! It’s sickening!

Now, the ringleader, for what it’s worth, Liam seems to be a middle class ne’er do well who has been in scraps with the police. And yes, there he is. To do with that and I won’t go into it now, but he doesn’t seem to be a very well adjusted young man. And then the rest of them look like a fairly typical assortment of troubled young leftists who display the three prime traits of, well what I would call that the prime traits of leftists.

Smugness, lack of self reflection and self knowledge, and irrational, almost unbridled hatred of their opponents, or people they see as their opponent. Smugness, lack of self reflection and self knowledge, and irrational hatred of their opponent. It’s so typical, down the ages. And here they are, another iteration of blind leftists.

One of them said that doxing a fascist — by which he was referring to me — isn’t the same as doxing saying an ordinary person. And this is an exercise in dehumanizing their opponents so that they can abuse him and put them in danger.

I’m sure there’s a psychological term for it. “Transference”, or something. I don’t know. It’s very interesting to witness. No, he’s not an ordinary person. Doing this to him is not the same as doing it to an ordinary person. We can endanger him without feeling bad.

And then the ringleader, Liam, … His father congratulated him on, I think it was on Twitter, on publishing my details! Imagine that? I think it’s bizarre and sickening that a father would congratulate his son on endangering another man.

“Well done son! You endangered that guy. You put his life at risk. Well done! I’m proud of you!”

What kind of family is that?

Ideological leftists, I think is the answer. But good God!

Well, also incidentally, there was apparently a prank phone call made to that father. And I want on record, so to speak, that I had nothing to do with this. I put the message out once I heard, around that people had found their names and addresses. I didn’t want trouble. And I put the message out:

“Don’t harass these people. We should be better than them.”

But, unfortunately, not everyone heeded that call and somebody phoned his father. It’s unfortunate and regrettable. To be honest I don’t really want to beat on these anti-fa losers very much, because it seems to me that they are just naive, internally troubled. And, of course, they would laugh about that Scoff at that, the very idea that they’ve got any psychological frailties, but I’m pretty damn sure they have. I think though, troubled, naive young idealists, who probably have heads full of bright ideas and not a shred of realism and not a shred of self reflection.

[75:03]

I also think they have probably been used as pawns, useful idiots, by other people who are more powerful. But, I don’t want to get too paranoid about that. Could be that this is just all their game. I don’t know.

Anyway, I think the salient point is that anti-fa, including these Marxists, have a limited window in which to operate. Much like the legacy media have a limited time frame.

Anti-fa, ten years from now, I think will be despised by the public in general. I’m pretty damn confident about that. And I think that probably they are as well. I think they probably sense this as well.

Unsavory people indeed! And honestly, I think they are tragic people! And they are lost, lost young people!

How much compassion should I show them? They’ve endangered me.

It’s funny, I can’t help feeling sorry for them. I can’t help, .. I actually feel some concern for these people, can you believe that? I actually do.

I think I’ll end this segment now, before I get too nice, because these people are after all fucking villains! I mean, what they’ve done is shitty! Yeah. I’ll leave it there.

Part Six: Closing Thoughts

OK. And some closing thoughts.

At the end of this Sunday’s, what is it, the Scottish Sunday Herald article, read thus:

“Last year was a good one for the Alt-Right. The election of Trump has bolstered the movement thinning the lines between the broad alternative American right and the White nationalist extremism of the Alt-Right. This year hasn’t been a good one for Collin Robertson.”

There’s this note of rather sickening triumphalism;

“Last year was a good one for the Alt-Right. This year hasn’t been a good one for Collin Robertson.”

And they wonder why I refused their interview back in November.

But I have to say, on the contrary, my channel has grown by twenty percent since this whole thing started. And what’s more, the exposure has achieved what ten years of torment couldn’t achieve. It has finally got me out of the house!

I’ve finally flown the nest! And well, as for my name being known, so what? I never wanted a normal life anyway. It’s not going to be possible, now. But I don’t care! I never wanted one. So, I haven’t really lost anything there. And then what’s in a name? I mean, why did they want my name in the first place? What do you think you’ve won?

I would say to the mainstream media and these anti-fa types as well, who are involved in it.

Anyone, and this is really crucial, anyone can look at my work, whether it’s on YouTube, or anywhere else. Anyone can look at my work and see that I’m not the villain you’ve tried to paint me as.

And then, they will see how dishonest you are! And for what it’s worth, since this all started, four thousand people HAVE looked at my work and they have liked what they’ve seen! And have realized that you are disgracefully dishonest! So, so far, although it has been stressful, 2017 has actually been a very good year for me. I’ve got four thousand new subscribers [laughing] and I’m away from home.

I no longer live my dad! So you can’t even use that charge against me anymore.

So we’ll see what the rest of 2017 has and store. And I’m not complacent about this. It might well be a stressful year. But, certainly I think it’s rather too early for the mainstream media to be smug about this.

Now, one final thing. In all of this they have tried to paint me as a villain, hater, ranter, whatever else, neo-Nazi, racist and all this. But also, they’ve tried to paint me as some kind of political activist.

[80:03]

Now, I started this channel three years ago. Actually, funnily enough something I meant to mention is that. That guy turned up at my door on the fifth of January. That was the anniversary ersary of the first video being uploaded to the channel. Rather ironic! Anyway, I started this channel three years ago thinking that it would come to nothing. I thought I’d make fifteen, or twenty videos. No one would watch them, and I would just lose interest and give up and find something else to do.

I never intended it to be political activism. And even as it grew, I didn’t intend it to be political activism. And I don’t see myself as a political activist. The world of politics does not appeal to me. I think it’s a cesspit! And I don’t think I’d be any good in that world.

So I don’t see myself as a political activist. If anything, and this sounds a bit pretentious, I’m going to say it. I see myself as a psychological activist, or even a spiritual activist. I see myself working at that level. I’m trying to help people as individuals and as a group, my group.

So, that’s what I’m trying to do. I’m trying to heal people. To help them overcome the nihilism and the confusion of the age that we live in.

In my work I try to understand the world. I try to understand people, and to help them, enlighten them, inspire them, work through their problems, counsel them and bring them together with other people. In the course of doing so I have enabled relationships to begin and children to be conceived [there’s a joke somewhere there — KATANA] . And occasionally I have even saved lives.

So, I’m not ashamed.

I’m not ashamed of what I’ve done! And I’m absolutely going to continue!

So, I hope you have enjoyed your campaign. It has backfired! It has failed!

It has benefited me! And it has only encouraged me to keep going.

Thank you for watching.

[83:18]

END

[After a year’s break from blogging and interviews TANSTAAFL returns with this interview with John Friend at his The Realist Report site. I consider TANSTAAFL to be one of the most insightful commentators on the jewish problem, and in this interview he doesn’t disappoint with his take on what’s being going on in our movement to expose and rid ourselves of the organized evil jewish cabal that dominates our societies.

Topics include; the ongoing jew war on Whites, the meaning of “conspiracy theory”, kikeservatives, Twitter, the jewsmedia, Trump, Bannon, (((the echo meme))), Alt-Right, Richard Spencer, Greg Johnson, Jared Taylor, Hitler and National Socialist Germany, and White racial consciousness — KATANA.]

_______________________

On this edition of The Realist Report, we’re joined once again by Tanstaafl of Age of Treason. To begin the program, Tanstaafl gives listeners an overview of what he’s been up to lately, including being banned from Twitter for making factual statements about Jews and their anti-White agenda. We move on to focus on the Jewish problem more generally, and the open and quite blatant war being waged on Whites by the organized Jewish community. We also discuss Trump’s election, the Alt Right, and related topics.

Click the link for the audio:

The Realist Report – Tanstaafl

The Realist Report

Interviews

TANSTAAFL — 2016

Published on Dec 8, 2016

TRANSCRIPT

[00:00]

John Friend: And he was openly, you know, he had the (((brackets))) around his name and whatnot. And he wrote this article a couple months ago titled, I can’t remember the exact title, but is basically, “A vote for Trump is a vote for mainstreaming anti-Semitism!”

And his argument was that the Alt-Right has been so energizing, has gained so much traction, because of Trump and, because of the Trump campaign and what he’s done and how he’s criticizing the media. And how he’s criticizing the establishment and it’s stance on immigration. And political correctness and so many other important issues. And I think all of that is true, although I don’t know if Trump himself was attempting to do that.

 

[114:24]

 

 

END

 

 

======================================

 

 See Also:

 

The Realist Report Interviews TANSTAAFL — 2016 — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

The Realist Report – Tanstaafl: The Jew As A Parasite — TRANSCRIPT

 

Luke Ford – JQ Debate with Age Of Treason – Mar 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

======================================

 

Click to download a PDF of this post:   (not yet available)

 

 

Version History

 

Version 10: Feb 5, 2022  — Transcript now fully proofed (114mins).

 

Version 9: Feb 4, 2022  — Now proofed transcript up to 94/114 mins.

 

Version 8: Feb 3, 2022  — Improved formatting of transcript up to 67 mins.

 

Version 7: Feb 1, 2022  — Added See Also links.

 

Version 6: Dec 15, 2016  — Proofed 20 more minutes of transcript. Total completed = 65 minutes.

 

Version 5: Dec 14, 2016  — Proofed 20 more minutes of transcript. Total completed = 45 minutes.

 

Version 4: Dec 13, 2016  — Proofed 10 more minutes of transcript. Total completed = 25 minutes.

 

Version 3: Dec 12, 2016  — Proofed 10 more minutes of transcript. Put out requests for volunteers to help with the transcript at: The Realist Report and Age of Treason.  Total completed = 15 minutes.

 

Version 2: Dec 11, 2016  — Proofed 5 minutes of transcript. Put out requests for volunteers to help with the transcript at: Morgoth’s Review, Stormfront, VNN, Irish Savant, and The Daily Stormer.  Total completed = 5 minutes.

 

Version 1: Published Dec 10, 2016  — Added rough draft of transcript.

[In these two latest videos Ramzpaul explains why he has dropped his support for the Alt-Right “label” after Richard Spencer failed to disavow the movement’s “Nazi” element following the NPI Conference, where some attendees gave “sieg heils” when Spencer raised his glass and declared loudly, “Hail Trump! Hail our people! Hail Victory!”  

Although Ramzpaul makes many good points on some side issues I think he’s making a mountain out of a molehill out of this whole incident by declaring the Alt-Right’s “brand” toxic because of it.

More seriously though, is Ramzpaul’s belief that the website, “The Daily Stormer” which has recently claimed to be Alt-Right, is in fact fake opposition, funded by the ADL.

But then in that case, what about Amren, which Ramzpaul does support, and its leader, Jared Taylor, who attended the conference and is openly pro-jew? The very people whose organizations are behind our on-going destruction! Is Amren also fake opposition, funded by the ADL, Ramzpaul? —  KATANA]

RAMZPAUL

ON

Alt-Right — RIP

&

“Sieg Heiling”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8HBLX_khwQ

 

Description

 

Published on Nov 23, 2016

 

Donald Trump disavows the Alt Right after Roman salutes are featured at the NPI conference.

After NPI’s Roman Salutes,  President elect Trump was forced to disavow the Alt Right. Most normal people can support the Alt Right ideas of self-determination, protection of borders, good trade deals, America First, etc. But normal people can’t support anything that is associated with Nazism.

In my discussions with Brietbart I explained the tension between the Alt Right versus the 14/88 crowd. In general, Breitbart was sympathetic to the ideas of the Alt Right as I described them.

However, they obviously did not support the 14/88 notion of the Alt Right.

Eventually, the 14/88 crowd won this battle once Richard Spencer was associated with Nazism. Of course, I don’t think Richard is a Nazi. But it does not matter at this point. Whenever the Alt Right is discussed in the media, they will show the Roman Salute clip over and over. And as Richard is the self proclaimed leader of the Alt Right, the brand is now impossible to rehabilitate.

But it really doesn’t matter at this point. The Alt Right was a phenomenon that helped launch Trump into the White House. Now that he has been elected, there is no need for the “alternative” label. We are now the Trump Right.

 

http://www.returnofkings.com/76454/what-is-the-alternative-right

 

___________________

 

 

Alt-Right — RIP

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

[5:37]

 

 

 

Hey guys. First of all I’m still in the process of moving back home. I don’t know my final location, but, so I don’t have my camera equipment. But I thought I had to discuss this whole thing that blew-up with Richard Spencer and the NPI and the Alt-Right. And, first of all what was reported was outrageous. Because supposedly Richard said that he asked the question, “Are Jews even human?” He didn’t ask that and in his speech he said, “Are Republican strategists even human?”. It was a joke! He wasn’t talking about Jews. So, CNN had lied there. And there’s supposedly the, you know, the Roman salute that happened. All Richard did was he had a glass and did a toast, “Hail Trump!” at the end. Big deal! We say “Hail To the Chief” for the president. It shouldn’t be that big of an issue. But unfortunately, we have some people that intentionally got up and did the Roman salute, a couple times, I guess there before and they did that and tweeted it.

 

[Image] Richard Spencer raising his glass while announcing, “Hail Trump! Hail our people! Hail Victory!” at the NPI Conference 2016.

 

And yeah, at that point, Donald Trump had to disavow the Alt-Right. Because, you can’t hang on to something that’s Nazi. You just can’t! Because Naziism, it was seventy years ago. It’s just a brand that doesn’t translate well. It scares people. And if you’re going to do a seig heil, it’s over! It’s really over! And so, the truth, it doesn’t really matter what happened with NPI and with Richard Spencer. It’s a perception. And whenever they think about the Alt-Right now, people are going to think about the Romans salute! [laughing] And I won’t even do it now otherwise they’ll use my image.

 

[Image] “Hands up” at the NPI Conference 2016.

 

And yeah, that’s not fair, but politics is not fair. So now the Alt-Right brand is damaged. It’s associated with Naziism. And normal Americans aren’t going to support that. Which is a shame, but it’s really OK, you know. Why am I saying it’s OK? For a period of time before Trump got elected, the Alt-Right really grew. And part of the reason — I’m a little of the reason, just hang on — I did an interview with Milo and I spoke to him briefly. He’d use a lot of my quotes with Breitbart when they talk about, “What is the Alt-Right?” And I did some also some articles for “Return of the Kings”, some videos. And I try to explain what the Alt-Right is. It’s not traditional conservatism, which is about low taxes and open borders, but it’s also not 14/88, about neo-Nazis and all that shit! It’s about having an identity. That all people, jews, White people, Chinese — we all have an identity and we all have the right to live and of self-determination. That’s a core.

 

There’s other issues too with trade and so forth, but that was basically the core. It’s not like this Nazi hate ideology! And, you know, what? Most people can really get on to that. Most people are like:

“Yeah, I’m tired of political correctness. If other groups have identity, why can’t we? Why can’t we all have nationalism?”

 

And it really resonates with people.

 

And it did with Breitbart. And I know, because Milo published it and Steve Bannon saw that. And that’s why Steve Bannon, Trump’s Chief of Staff now, was on board with the Alt-Right. Because it’s something you can defend! But what happened is, immediately the enemy primarily and I’ll say it, I’ve said this before. I think Daily Stormer, to be honest, is a fake opposition. I think is funded by the ADL. And I’m not going to get into debates, why. I think that, I really do. And initially this Daily Stormer, they were opposed to the Alt-Right. But when they saw that it was getting on, they changed their strategy. And I said “they”, because I don’t think it’s just Andrew Anglin [laughing] that is in charge of it. I’ve heard his interviews. I think there’s a whole group that works on that website. And they decided to repurpose it, or try to co-opt the Alt-Right, to say:

“Hey! The Alt-Right is all about Naziism, of 14/88”.

 

And they were so good at that, they were basically able to say:

“Hey! 14/88 and Naziism, that is the core of the Alt-Right, and the rest of you are trying to co-opt what we’re doing!”

 

Which was nonsense. But that was their strategy. And, but there was a lot of tension there between it. But still the ones that looked at the Alt-Right is not being Naziism, but being [about] identity, about being nationalism, were able to win the day initially up to the election. Then right after the election, … Yeah, finally because of the Richard Spencer thing that blew apart, now it is associated with Naziism!

 

But it’s OK! It doesn’t matter. It would be kind of like you’re playing a basketball game and you’re winning by two points, at the last second the guy shoots it, and it’s a three point shot. And you go, “Oh no! We lost!” But no, the game ended before the three pointer went in! And that’s kind of what happened.

 

We kind of won. We won, we got Trump in! So that’s fine.

So, I no longer identify as Alt-Right, just because, there’s no way of rehabilitating that whole image of what the Alt-Right is. It’s, I mean, good for Daily Stormer, I guess. They got it associated with Nazism and they’ve kind of quit that now. They’re trying to associate Republicanism with Nazism! [laughing] That’s their new strategy. Good luck with that!

 

[Image] The Daily Stormer, “America’s #1 Most-Trusted Republican News Source”.

 

That’s OK, because I want to look at the Alt-Right now instead of it just being the Right. There’s no need to have the “Alt” label anymore.

We have Donald Trump. People like me that support borders, that support immigration controls, that are opposed to globalism and free trade, we have our man in office now. We don’t need to call ourselves, “Alt-Right”.

 

So, I’ve given up the label, but I still support self-determination and nationalism for all! I’ll talk to you guys later.

 

[5:37]

 

END

 

 

_______________________

 

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHKU1n5kTWQ

 

Description

 

Published on Nov 29, 2016

 

A response to Richard Spencer’s video addressed to me:

https://youtu.be/zbQhie3ApyE

 

Richard Spencer created a video (see link above) that addressed me concerning many topics concerning the Alt Right. This is my video response to cover some of the common questions that people have raised that include:

 

1. What is Nazism

2. Punching to the Right

3. Disavowing

4. Cucking

5. Brand identity

6. Boundaries needed for a movement

 

From the list above, #6 is key. The idea that you can have a movement that has NO boundaries is insane. Yet, because some people have been fooled with the mantra “never punch to the right” and “never disavow” we now have the Alt Right brand associated with Hollywood Nazis. And as the mainstream media looks at Richard Spencer as the leader of the Alt Right, the fact that he won’t explicitly disavow Nazism is fatal to the movement.  The serious thinkers have been replaced with Hal Turner and Andrew Anglin types.

 

I think Richard is intelligent and quite eloquent. But I fear his message will be muted and he will become the new David Duke for his generation – pulled out every 4 years by the media to try to discredit the politician he endorses.

 

I recommend that Spencer should explicitly disavow that the Alt Right has any connection with Nazism. If he refuses to do so, the Alt Right brand will remain toxic and attract only the kook element.

 

 

The Alt-Right and Boundaries

 

TRANSCRIPT

 

 

 [11:42 min]

 

All right. This is going to be my last video about the “Richard Spencer, sieg heil” case.

 

But I want to do some clarification. And is going to be a little bit more in depth, because there’s a lot of questions about, you know, what is a Nazi, is it National Socialism, is it Hitler, is something new? What’s a Hollywood Nazi? And there’s a lot of ideas like:

 

“Hey dude, you can never punch right! Never punch right!” or, “Never disavow, don’t disavow! The left doesn’t do that!” or, “They’re going to call you a Nazi anyway, so why do you fight it?”

 

So, there’s all these things I just want to discuss a little bit.

 

Part of the problem whenever the word “Nazi” is thrown out, is like, “What’s really meant by that term?” Because it’s really so ill defined now. And, so I thought it was good to take a step back, you know, to understand there’s basically three categories that sort of fit the word “Nazi”.

 

The first one is National Socialism. National Socialism is not a political party. It’s a ideology. It’s an economic system, sort of like Socialism is, or Marxism. You know, for example, you can have Marxists, but there’s a lot of different political parties that may adopt Marxism, the same way with National Socialism. And National Socialism is really not about concentration camps, the Holocaust, jews. No! It’s an economic policy. It’s, for example, if you believe in single payer health care. That was a National Socialist policy. Protecting the environment was very important to the National Socialists. Protecting the workers through good trade deals. That was National Socialist. That’s all it is, and that they don’t really have any symbols as an ideology, like Capitalism, or Communism.

 

Then, in the 30’s, 1933 to 1945, just twelve years, just twelve years! That’s all it was in Germany. You had a political party that advocated National Socialism. And they were called the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. What we now know as the Nazis. Adolf Hitler and all that. And as a political party, like the Republicans and the Democrats, you had the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. And the Republicans, they have the elephant as their kind of symbol, the Democrats has a donkey. Well, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party had the swastika. That was it! It didn’t have anything to do with the National Socialism ideology. It had to do with that specific political party. And they also used the Roman salute, which became the Nazis salute, and so forth. And it was headed by Adolf Hitler.

 

That was in a sense the Nazi that ended in one 1945. And it was over! It was specifically German. So where is National Socialism, the economic policy, or the ideology, you could export to various countries — even Hitler thought that. But National Socialism German Workers Party, it makes absolutely no sense to export, because it’s just for Germans! So using a swastika elsewhere, especially like the Slavic areas, is stupid! It makes no sense! That party is dead. So the Nazis the real Nazis are all gone. They don’t exist anymore.

 

But we have this thing called, “neo-Nazis”. And neo-Nazis, they’ve really started after WW II and almost all of them, like, I posted the link before, have been false flag, heavily Jewish funded, or government funded organizations. And you can ask, “Why would they want to fund something like that?” Well, it’s to discredit nationalist organizations. Because after the war the National Socialist German Workers Party, the Nazis, were really demonized and that’s part of the propaganda. And some of it was justified, some probably wasn’t. But that’s not up for debate. What happened is they were made out to be the devil and it’s got all the worse. So they’re looked at, like Satan now! The worst thing imaginable. So what happened, these groups, they fund these neo-Nazis and then the neo-Nazis — and then this happened through the 70’s and the Illinois Nazis, headed by a Jewish guy, in the 90’s there was a guy named David Wolf something, that was a famous Nazi, he was fake, a Jew.

 

Recently we had Hal Turner, the big Nazi, he turned out to be a Federal informant, and you have groups like Daily Stormer, that I believe are fake and they are doing the same thing. And what they’re, … The goal of the neo-Nazis are is to attach themselves — because they know they’re toxic and 99.9% of people are opposed to them — they attach themselves to a movement they want to discredit. And, for example, originally that the Daily Stormer they attach themselves to Donald Trump and it’s not because they like Donald Trump, it’s because they wanted to discredit him. So the mainstream media can say:

“Look at these evil Nazis are supporting Donald Trump! Do you want to support someone that’s supported by Nazis?”

 

See, that was the psychology they were using. And it is pretty effective. And that happened with the Alt-Right too, the Daily Stormer was originally opposed to the Alt-Right, but when they saw it was gaining momentum, they decided to try to cut it off, by saying:

“No! No! The Alt-Right, it’s all about Nazis! If you’re not a Nazi you’re Alt-Right!”

 

They started to push that. Now they’re trying to tie it to Republicanism.

 

But the goal of neo-Nazis is just to discredit normal identity nationalist movements. And not to say, … I’m sure some people are very sincere. There are some sincere neo-Nazis, but in general Neo Naziism has nothing to do with the original National Socialism. I mean, if you go to sites like the Daily Stormer, they don’t really talk about the ideology of National Socialism, or the economic policies, they say the word “kike” over and over. But the original National Socialism wasn’t about saying, “kike, kike, kike, kike, kike, kike!” It had to do with something deeper. And it has nothing to do with the old Nazis of Adolf Hitler. They just use the same symbols, but it is really not related at all.

 

So, you have the three different groups. You have national socialism, which is the ideology. You have the National Socialist German Workers’ Party that was in Germany and then you have these Hollywood neo-Nazis that are mostly fake!

 

One of the things that just bugs me, it’s so frustrating! You hear this all the time is, like, “Dude! Never punched to the right!” Or, “Never disavow!” I mean, that is just retarded! It really is! [laughing]

 

Because, just think about it logically, right! If you can never punch to the Right, which means never criticize someone to the supposed right of you. That is the most extreme positions are beyond criticism! Right, just think of a thought experiment, the most the extreme Right-wing stereotypical position. I don’t know, anyone that doesn’t have blue eyes or blonde hair should be put to death! ! That’s pretty extreme! And so, anyone trying to criticize it, you behave:

“Dude! Dude! Don’t push to the right! Don’t push to the right!”

 

You see how stupid that is? And the guy has a psycho position could say:

“But why? You believe people with brown eyes should be able to live? What are you, a cuck? Cuck, cuck!”

 

See, this is just insane!

 

What you need to do as any organization is have a circle, a boundary. Yet, you can cuck, and what does cucky means, is you have your principles and you compromise your principles to try to appease the left. God knows, the mainstream Republicans have done that so much they have cucked on that. They’ve taken their principles, they betrayed them. That is wrong. That is cucking! But holding to your principles is not cucking! So you don’t have to support these neo-Nazi, Hollywood Nazi types, otherwise you’re a cuck. In effect if you don’t draw the boundary, you’re screwed. Because they’re going to taint your brand, which we saw with what happened in the Alt-Right.

 

So you do need to punch right when needed.

 

Now, the Left, they will punch right, left, if they need to, if they’re pressed on it by the Press. But they usually aren’t. That’s why they usually don’t punch left. But if they were pushed on it, they would. You know they would! And, for example, the whole idea too, that:

“Hey they’re going to call you Nazis, anyway, so you might as well just be a Nazi”.

 

That’s another argument, I hear. Well, again that is stupid! And I use an analogy. There’s the pick up artist community, of guys that try to seduce women, or whatever, into bed. I’m not saying that I agree with it or disagree with it, but the feminists always call them rapists! “Rapists! You’re a rapist!” Which is not, which is absurd! They are not rapists. They try to charge people. That’s not the same thing as rape. But should, by that logic, should they say:

“Well, hey, these feminists are going to call us rapists anyway, so we should self identify as a rapist!”

 

That’s stupid! No you don’t want to do that! It is the same thing with this “agree and amplify”. That could be a good strategy at times, but not like someone accuses you of being a child molester of an eight year old girl. You don’t want to “agree and amplify” and say:

“No! No! No! You’ve got that wrong! I rape four year olds!”

 

So that’s just dumb! You’ve got to have some maturity with this. So, as an organization including the Alt-Right, or whatever organization you have, you got to exclude people on the left, or the right. If you don’t exclude anyone on the right, then you’re just going to be, you’re going to lose it! Because the clowns are going to take over and define your movement. That’s what has happened in the Alt-Right.

 

Now, the sad thing is, I don’t disavow Richard Spencer, because — I’ll find this interview and I’ll link to it. He did after the conference and — the man really is brilliant. He’s eloquent. He has really interesting things to say. But, what’s really sad, is that is not going to be heard anymore because of his refusal to disavow these Nazi types. And it’s not that hard to say, to disavow. And, you know, he, I think he said:

“It has bad optics, but I’m not going to disavow, or anything like that.”

 

Well, if you don’t do that, then you’re always going to be associated with Nazis. And you could say:

“Well, I don’t care they could all be associated with Nazis”.

 

But 99.9% of the populace does care, and they won’t take your message seriously. And every time you’re introduced, you’re going to be introduced as a Nazi sympathizer with the “sieg heiling”. And again this has nothing to do with Naziism back in the 30’s. I’m talking about this Hollywood neo-Nazi, Daily Stormer version. You’re always going to be tainted with that, and no one is going to take you seriously.

 

And it causes also problems for the people that attended the convention. I kind of feel sorry for them, because whenever you’re attending convention you assume there’s going to be certain protocols. I’ve spoken at Amren, American Renaissance, and one of the things I’m confident of, is Jared Taylor is never going to turn [it] into this “sieg heil” fest. Because it would be embarrassing, that would taint me. And the same thing with the people that spoke at this now, they’re all have this on their hands and they have to say:

“Hey! I didn’t have anything to do with this!”

 

So, you’ve got to really think what you’re doing and look at the image of your brand, and you’ve got to have a brand that will appeal to people.

 

[Image] “Exuberant” attendees going all Roman on us. Actually the guy on the left kind of looks like Ramzpaul!

 

Now, White identity, self-determination, really all those things are winning points. Trade, the whole idea of the Alt-Right really sells to people. But once you mix into it the “sieg heiling” you just lose it! You just lose it.

So, what Richard, I wish he would have said is:

“Hey, I gave a speech, some people, four, or five people did this ‘sieg heil’. We can’t control what people do. I do not approve of this. We are not a Nazi organization. We disavow any Nazi influence, that’s not we’re what we’re about.”

And if you just said that, it would have ended it. Because people, yeah the Leftist still would have been mad, but who who gives a shit about them, but normal people would have looked at it and said:

“Yeah, well that makes sense, you know, you can’t control what your audience does. He disavowed the people who did that sort of thing, that sort of behavior.”

That’s the end of it. But if you don’t disavow it, you just try to play the game, like:

“It was just, they’re just trying to have fun, it’s bad optics”.

People are not going to buy it.

So, I think that is the last thing I’m going to to say on the same subject.

Talk to you guys later.

 

[11:42]

 

 

END

 

 

_________________________

 

============================================

 

Click to download a PDF of this post (1.2 MB):

 ramzpaul-alt-right-rip-and-sieg-heil-transcripts

Version History

Version 1: Nov 30, 2016 — Published post. Added PDF for download.

[In this 50 minute speech (including Q & A) at the Nov, 2016 NPI Conference, Prof. Kevin MacDonald discusses the long term role of organised jewry in pushing multiracialism, multiculturalism in the United States and the West. Jewish money power is at the forefront of financing both the Democrat Party and the Republican Party and steering their respective policies towards jewish goals, despite growing grassroots opposition, especially towards Israel and its murderous apartheid policy towards the Palestinians. MacDonald also discusses how organized jewry is notorious for opposing free speech related to race, ethnicity and immigration, in other words, anything that interferes with the jewish goal of destroying homogenous White societies  —  KATANA.]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g93OfL1Fybc#t=493

Youtube Description

Prof. Kevin MacDonald gives an informative talk at NPI 2016 in Washington D.C. about organized Jewish influence. Q & A follows the talk.

_____________

Kevin MacDonald

NPI 2016 Conference

TRANSCRIPT

[50:42]

[00:00]

Richard Spencer: I hope our next speaker won’t be insulted by the brevity of the introduction that I’m about to give.

There is no man on the planet who was done more for the understanding of the pole around which the world revolves than Kevin MacDonald! [audience applauds]

Welcome! They know who you are.

Kevin MacDonald [Kmac]: They know, oh, OK.

All right. It’s great to be here after such an exciting, inspiring victory for Donald Trump and I mean, I don’t think anybody really expected it, you know, watching that movie that Richard showed tonight, you know, he could be a hero of our people. And I think that’s what we would all hope and it could happen. I really do think it’s going to happen.

But tonight I’m going to talk about Jews. [audience erupts in laughter]

[Kmac laughing] it’s not that I relish doing this, but somebody’s got to do it! And it’s definitely a subject that should be addressed. The best that we can fairly, factually and realize, we’re not talking about all Jews. We’re talking about activist Jews, we are talking about the main thrust of the organized Jewish community, which is pretty easy to figure out.

[Image] Edward Alsworth Ross (December 12, 1866 – July 22, 1951) was an American sociologist, one of first sociologists who pursued a comprehensive sociological theory. Regarded as a founder of sociology in the United States, he believed that the purpose of sociology was to bring about social reform, solving problems in human society. 

The fact is, the beginning in the 19th century Jews often saw America as a promised land. Whose, quote, “streets are paved with gold” as they often wrote to their families back in Europe. Paved with gold. Jews were therefore staunch advocates of unrestricted immigration. Writing in 1914 University of Wisconsin sociologist, Edward A Ross believed that a very liberal immigration policy was exclusively a Jewish issue. And he quoted the prominent author and Zionist pioneer, Israel Zangwill, who articulated the idea that America is an ideal place to achieve Jewish interests. Quote, he said:

“America has ample room for all the six million Russian Jews. [audience laughter] Any one of her States could absorb them and next to having a country of their own there could be no better fate for them to be in a country. Land of civil and religious liberty, of whose constitution Christianity formed no part and where their collective votes were practically guarantee them against future persecution.”

Again, that was 1914.

[Image] Israel Zangwill on the front cover of “Time” magazine, 1923.

Zangwill, who was the author of a famous play called “The Melting Pot” that premiered in 1908, here in Washington D.C., the heart of American political culture. What’s interesting is his idea that America was a land where all the old ethnic hatreds would be abolished in a grand symphony of ethnic harmony.

[Image] Cover of Theater Programme for Israel Zangwill’s play “The Melting Pot“.

We’ve heard that a few times!

In the play, a Jewish immigrant fleeing Russian pogroms comes to America, writes a great symphony and marries a Christian woman. Audiences were wildly enthusiastic. There were cries, a quote from an academic paper. There were cries for Zangwill after every scene and President Teddy Roosevelt himself joined the applause. During the play he sat next to Mrs Zangwill and positively raved. When Zangwill took his bows afterward, the President shouted across the room, “That’s a great play Mr Zangwill!”

Throughout the drama the main Jewish character argues that the United States is a land of universal love and brotherhood. He sees it as a place where all the divisions among men will soon disappear:

“Within the stirring and seething in the vast cauldron, the great alchemist was melting Celt and Latin, Slav and Teutons, Greek and Syrian, Black and Yellow. He was fusing together East and West, North and South, pole and equator, Crescent and Cross” end of quote.

So you see what he’s getting at here, Crescent and Cross, Black, Yellow, White all coming together in beautiful harmony. And, of course, this is fifty years after the Civil War.

[05:51]

The reception given the play, and remember this is over a century ago, that this image appealed to many Americans, including many prominent Americans, like President Roosevelt. Of course it didn’t appeal to all Americans. This is a period when actually most Americans opposed continuing this unrestricted immigration policy. And Jewish organizations were doing the best they could to keep the doors open, which they did do until 1924.

Immigration restriction was, in fact, picking up steam in no small part because many Jewish immigrants were on the politically radical left.

Professor Ross went on to discuss the endeavor of Jews to control the immigration policy of the United States:

“The systematic campaign in newspapers and magazines to break down all arguments for restriction and to calm nativists fears as waged by and for one race. Hebrew money is behind the main anti-restrictionist league and it’s numerous publications. From the favorable ??? The commercial body, or the scientific association, to the heavy treatises produced by the aid of the Baron de Hirst Fund, the work that proves the blessings of immigration to all classes in America emanates from subtle Hebrew brains.” End of quote.

Nothing much has changed in the last century, except that someone like Professor Ross would have a terrible time in today’s academic world.

Jews were correct that America did indeed hold great promise as a place where Jews could thrive. And part of that was about who we are, the, the “goyim” [audience laughter and clapping], us! There’s a very long liberal tradition in America, going back, most importantly to the Puritan strand of American culture that dominated America really until the 1960s and the rise of Jewish power. This tradition prized individualism, which I think has an ethnic basis. Individuals are relatively less ethnocentric, they tend towards assimilating other groups rather than erecting strong barriers between groups. Hence the appeal of Zangwill’s play. He knew what buttons to push.

[Image] Citizenship and equal rights.

And important strand of this type of American individual had been to develop wildly optimistic theories of the American future. Liberal theories of the nineteenth century saw a future America as dominated by people who looked and thought exactly like themselves. Even people of different races would ultimately become White Anglo-Saxon, and Protestant, no matter what their racial religious background. Or as Zangwill proposes, it is actually quite a bit different. The idea that all Americans come together and meld into one great race.

Of course now we have multiculturalism. But that continues it’s optimistic trajectory. Americans are supposed to remain optimistic that this is all going to work out as Hilary often said, “stronger together” right? We’re going to continue to just keep going and things are going to turn out, … There maybe some problems, you know, it’s going to all work out.

Zangwill obviously understood how to appeal to American optimism about the future, even though his own views were strongly Zionist. And he saw the Jewish religion as not only morally superior, but also as a way of preserving the purity of their race, as they call it. And, of course, we see a lot of contemporary Zangwills in the media and the academic world.

If indeed America is a promised land for Jews, a large part of the credit must go to Jews themselves for using their power in the media and the educational system to campaign against nativism while retaining their own strong ethnic commitments, and for creating the image of America as a, quote, “land of immigrants”.

[09:54]

[Image] Lothrop Stoddard (June 29, 1883– May 1, 1950), was an American political theorist, historian, eugenicist, and anti-immigration advocate who wrote a number of prominent books on race. Stoddard was born in Brookline, Massachusetts in 1883 to a prominent New England family. He attended Harvard College, graduating magna cum laude in 1905, and studied Law at Boston University until 1908. Stoddard received a Ph.D. in History from Harvard University in 1914, and was also an avid stamp collector. He published many books on the peril of non-White immigration, his most famous being The Rising Tide of Color in 1920. In this book he presented a view of the world situation pertaining to race focusing concern on the coming population explosion among non-Whites in the Third World.

Jews therefore did not create this liberal tradition in America, but they very quickly discovered how do appeal to it as the reception given to Zangwill’s play shows. And they fought hard against non liberal views on America, particularly views associated with the American South, where separation between the races had become the norm by 1908. And also against theorists like Madison Grant, Lothrop Stoddard, and so on. They were very much influenced by Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution and so on. After World War Two anti-Darwinian Jewish intellectuals became a dominant elite in American universities and in the media. Most noteworthy was the Frankfurt School’s claim that ethnocentrism among Whites was a psychiatric disorder! [audience booing] Very influential. This scene was quickly picked up by Jewish activists, organizations with access to the schools and the media and, of course, it continues today.

[Image] Madison Grant

I wrote a chapter, showing that Jews were the main force, and a necessary condition, I think, for the 1965 immigration law that opened up immigration to all the peoples of the world. But Jewish support for immigration and multiculturalism creates obvious problems for Jews. One example is immigration of Muslims. Many of whom are hostile to Jews and hostile to Israel. And once they get here they often make alliances with these White social activists who are also critical of Israel.

The situation is particularly acute in the U.K., although it’s just a matter of time before a critical mass of Muslims in the US leads to similar patterns. In the U.K. you’ve got Jeremy Corbyn’s Labor Party is absolutely dependent on Muslim votes and Jewish money. But Jewish money has been deserting the party as Labor takes an ever more critical view of Israel. The same process is brewing in the US, but it will take a while longer. Right now, only a bare majority of Democrats actually favor Israel, 53% compared to 23% favoring the Palestinians. Compared to the Republicans which is 79 to 7  [percent], much more lopsided. And, of course, that explains why Donald Trump would have been foolish indeed to criticize Israel.

[Image] “The Center for American Progress is an independent nonpartisan policy institute that is dedicated to improving the lives of all Americans, through bold, progressive ideas, as well as strong leadership and concerted action. Our aim is not just to change the conversation, but to change the country.”

Source: https://www.americanprogress.org/about/mission/

As usual Jewish money talks. It should surprise no one that the far left Center for American Progress hosted far right Israeli ethno-nationalist Benjamin Netanyahu with a softball interview. And Wiki Leaks showed that this action resulted in new members of the board of directors. The implication being that they came up, he came up, with a large donation. The result is someone who supports the nationalist right in Israel is on board with the Center for American Progress in the United States. So we certainly won’t expect the Center for American Progress to take a principled stand on Israel.

As Philip Weiss notes, Jewish money is critical to the Democrats and a big reason is supporting Israel. He cites Jeffrey Goldberg saying that the Democratic Party is divided between the progressive rank and file who have had it with Israel, and the donor class which is, quote, “disproportionately Jewish and has been so for many years”. And it’s sort of the same, or sort of similar to the Republican Party with a similar gap between the rank and file and the donor class, but on very different issues.

For example, the top five donors to Clinton were Jews. “Forward” editor J. J. Goldberg said, quote:

“You ask a Democratic fundraiser, where did he get the money from? Well, from trial lawyers, from toys, from generic drugs, from Hollywood, from Jews. Those are all essentially Jewish industries. When you’re raising money you need to find rich people, who are not right-wing and they are not, pardon me for saying this, are not many rich goyim who are not right-wing.” end quote.

This is another example that Jews fund the Left and that has been going on, probably for forever, you know, decades!

[Image] Sen. Bernie Sanders is flanked by Rep. Keith Ellison, left, and Imam Talib Shareet at an event at The Nation’s Mosque, in Washington, D.C., Dec. 16, 2015.

But it’s a mixed picture! The times are changing! And it’s a good sign of this, is that both Bernie Sanders, it’s really interesting, and Israel Lobby stalwart, Chuck Schumer are both supporting Keith Ellison. This Muslim black activist congressman from Minnesota as head of the Democratic National Committee. Even though he’s been a strong critic of Israel. He called Israel an apartheid state. It’s amazing!

And even many Jewish donors are discontinuing their support for Israel because of it’s policies. According to Stephen Cohen a very prominent Jewish demographer, Where they used to say, “I don’t like Israeli policies, but I love Israel” it is now affecting their commitment to Israel. Being an Israeli, being liberal in support of Israel obviously sets up a lot of cognitive dissonance. But there is lots of evidence from Wiki Leaks that the Clinton campaign was exquisitely sensitive to the pro-Israel sentiments of it’s Jewish donors, including, especially someone like Haim Saban who is number one, or two. He’s a pro-Israel fanatic. He said, “Israel is my only issue.”

[15:05]

Most of the hostility towards Israel is deeply entwined with their religious identity, but among Whites, as usual, it’s all about wanting to be morally upright. In the past, much of this support for Israel has been based on a sense of moral righteousness of Israel, as a result of wall to wall propaganda for as long as I can remember. It’s the usual mantra. Israel is America’s best ally, the only democracy in the Middle East. The Israeli army is the most moral army in the world, etc. But basing the sense of righteousness on Israel is indefensible given Israel’s record of ethnic cleansing, apartheid, oppression of the Palestinians, which has resulted in very substantial international isolation.

This increasing isolation and contentiousness within the Jewish community, because it really is a big issue now in the Jewish community, will continue because the oppression is so obvious that even the media can’t cover it up completely.

Fundamentally, Israel is incapable of reforming itself. We have to come to grips with how pervasive Jewish ethnocentrism is, particularly in Israel. I suspect there’s always been a tendency for the most ethnocentric Jews to move to Israel. In my 2007 review of Mearsheimer and Walt’s, “The Israel Lobby” I noted that Mearsheimer and Walt try to see Israel as a normal state, capable of making rational decisions. But the extremists are in charge and have been so, since at least the 1967 war.

[Image] The Israel Lobby by Mearsheimer (left) and Walt.

Any attempt to make a meaningful withdraw from the West Bank and Jerusalem and allow a viable Palestinian state would produce a civil war. As throughout Jewish history the most committed members have determined which way the entire community is going to go. This is doubtless true of most groups, but is especially true with Jews. They have a very long history of fanaticism, even suicidal fanaticism, going back to the Middle Ages in the ancient world.

I reminded of Christiane Amanpour’s depiction of Jewish fanatics in their excellent TV documentary, “God’s Jewish Warriors”. These West Bank settlers and Jewish activists are massively ethnocentric and unlike the propaganda put out by the [Jewish] lobby, they are not at all democratic. They live in a completely Jewish world where their every thought and perception is colored by their Jewish identity. Their’s an apartheid world, separated by high walls from the Palestinian neighbors. And at a time when Americans are constantly being encouraged by Jewish organizations such as the A.D.L. to be ever more tolerant of all kinds of diversity, these people are anything, but tolerant. Calls for expropriation, expulsion of the Palestinians are common place. Israel has created a classic Middle Eastern segmentary society in which different groups live in in-group-out-group world, completely isolated from each other.

[Image] Palestinian blood on the hands of organized jewry and its proxy power “America”.

And since the fanatics are the ones having the children this situation will become more extreme in the future. If you look historically, Israeli governments have steadily moved to the right over the years. The present Israeli government is the most right-wing in its history, including overtly racialist cabinet members like, Avigdor Lieberman. Israel is not going to change. The fanatics will go down fighting, rather than give up the West Bank, or Jerusalem. This does not appeal to the average social justice warrior in the United States.

What I’m saying, is that a combination of Israeli intransigence, the felt need to cooperate with Muslim groups that are critical of Israel, hostility by White social justice warriors, and now even for many Jews. The relationship between Israel and the Jewish Diaspora faces difficult times and probably a transition period. In this regard it is interesting and in the wake of the election, Jewish groups are making very high-profile overtures to make cooperation with Muslim groups. And that could be what’s going on with Chuck Schumer supporting Keith Ellison for head of the D.N.C.

I realize that non-White immigration and encouraging social warrior justice mentality have been intensively advocated by Jewish organizations for decades. In a very real sense they brought this on themselves.

The fact is that despite Muslim hostility and the increasingly felt need for Jews to cooperate with groups that are hostile to Israel, Jewish organizations have uniformly supported high levels of Muslim immigration and refugee gees without limit.

An obvious problem for Jews is that opposing Muslim immigration would be completely at odds with the ideology of multiculturalism and diversity. The, “We are all the same” mantra. The idea that immigration is a moral imperative that should not be judged by the interest of Western nations, and the idea that the nations of the West are “proposition nations” dedicated only to ideas like, “freedom and democracy” with no ethnic, or religious connotations. Obviously this was Zangwill’s view back in 1908.

[20:20]

This ideology of America has been promoted by Jewish intellectual movements and the organized Jewish community at least since before World War Two, is a major theme of my book “The Culture of Critique”. Jewish organizations were unanimous in condemning Trump’s proposal for a moratorium on Muslim immigration, and has been a strong proponent of increasing Syrian and African refugees throughout the West.

Just recently I ran across a couple of paragraphs from Lawrence Auster, of course, he’s dead now, but he was a Jewish writer, very, really understood Jews in a lot of ways. He expressed the logic this way. He said:

“When Jews put together the idea that, quote, ‘all social prejudices and exclusion leads potentially to Auschwitz’ and the idea that all bigotry is individual. They must reach the conclusion that any exclusion of any group, no matter how alien it may be to the host society, is a potential Auschwitz!”

So there it is he says:

“We have identified the core Jewish conviction that makes Jews keep pushing relentlessly for mass immigration. Even the mass immigration of their deadliest enemies! In the thought process of Jews, to keep Jew hating Muslims out of America would be tantamount to preparing the way for another Jewish Holocaust!”

End of the quote from Auster.

[Image] A prominent jewish writer, Lawrence Auster. For critical commentary on Auster please see: http://age-of-treason.com/tag/lawrence-auster/

I also think that Jews see Whites as more of an enemy than Muslims, down the road. You know, Muslims are not a high IQ group, they’re not going to become an elite in our society. And I don’t think that Jews see them as competitors.

And when they think of history, when Jews, if you ask the average Jew who has been to synagogue and learned his history from the rabbi, you know, Jewish history starts out in the world with the Romans sacking the temple. And it goes to the Middle Ages where there were expulsions. Middle ages where there was the Crusades, the Inquisition and so on. And it moves into the more modern period and you have persecution in Russia, the pogroms, and then you have the Holocaust. That’s Jewish history in a nutshell, right there.

Well who did all that? White people did that! Europeans did that! European civilization did that! Christianity did that! That’s the way they think about it.

Jewish organizations in the West have actually been aware for some time that many non-White immigrants have anti-Jewish attitudes, or at least they are much less likely be sympathetic to Jewish issues like the Holocaust, and Israel.

One issue has been street crime against Jews, especially in Europe. And as a result Jews have been strong advocates for police state type controls on thought and behavior, to ensure Jewish security. In Germany, Belgium and really everywhere in Europe now, most everywhere, synagogues, Jewish schools and other organizations are put under constant police surveillance, even before the big recent upsurge in migration.

So an obvious upside to this low to moderate levels of Muslim hostility for Jewish organizations is that they provide a rationale for adopting policies that have long been advocated by the Jewish community, including, especially, curbs on free speech. And in particular, speech related to ethnicity and immigration. It’s no accident, for example, in Germany the migrant crisis that led to a campaign to shut down criticism of the invasion on Facebook with the full Cooperation of open borders fanatic Mark Zuckerman. Recently Twitter set up a committee which includes the A.D.L. and various social justice warriors, in order to better police it’s content and now we find that Richard Spencer and Radix, and so on, have been excluded from Twitter!

The fact is, the A.D.L. is notoriously opposed to free speech. I’ve written a couple of things on that. Not only in America, but throughout the world, wherever there’s Jewish communities. Jewish communities are opposed to free speech, especially on immigration and race.

In general, the organized Jewish community throughout the West have been a major force in placing penalties on speech related to race, ethnicity and immigration. And I do fear that in the wake of the Trump victory, that we’re going to see a major attempt to shut down discussion of the Alt-Right. That other accounts, they’re worried that the Southern Poverty Law Center wanted one hundred different accounts taken off Twitter. Well, maybe I’m on there, maybe you’re on there? There are a lot of other accounts that may well be shut down. They don’t, I think in their ideal world, they don’t want any more stories on the Alt-Right. They want to put them back in the box. I’m not sure that’s going to be possible.

[25:03]

But in short, the mainstream view among Jews remains that the transformation in the West is manageable for Jews. And if some Jews are motivated to emigrate to Israel because of street level hostility towards Jews by Muslims, this will not impact Jewish elites. In Europe they are not affected by street level crime. Wealthy, powerful Jews are not likely to leave and will continue to be a critical force in favor of the dissolution of traditional Western, of traditional European cultures and the displacement of European peoples. Jewish power and influence in the West has never rested on numbers. Western societies function much more like oligarchies than democracy as seen by the fact there are huge differences between popular attitudes and the attitudes of the elite donor class, and so on, on critical issues like immigration. In such a political structure, a tiny, but wealthy, group with access to the media can wield enormous power.

Steve Bannon saying that he would like to destroy all of today’s establishment, is heartening indeed.

[Image] Stephen Kevin “Steve” Bannon (born November 27, 1953) is an American campaign manager, businessman, and media executive. He became chief executive officer of the 2016 presidential campaign of Donald Trump in August 2016. Bannon has been named chief strategist and Senior Counselor for the Presidency of Donald Trump.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Bannon

Audience member: Yeah! Yeah! [Audience applauds]

Kmac: Because all of today’s establishment oppose Trump. From the far left to the neo-conservative right. We were the only group, the only identifiable intellectual perspective that supported Donald Trump. We should be given a seat at the table, but, … [Audience applauds] However, given that a major political party in the U.K. has gone in a direction not at all to the liking of the Jewish establishment, could not have done so without the aid of Muslim votes. I suspect that a change of attitude on Muslim immigration, refugee gee policy may be in the offering. Not yet. There’s definitely a point at which Jews will be forced to rethink their attitudes.

Notice that such a shift would not be the result of low-level street crime against Jews that has occurred in France. This is manageable and actually it produces a lot more policing. And it actually produces some Jewish in-group solidarity when you have this kind of thing go on. They identify more as Jews and so on., but this shift will come about, because such a development hits the Jewish community where it hurts the most, at the level of political control. Because Muslim votes are having an effect at the level of power politics. The very real consequences of this for Jewish power, is indeed very worrying to the Jewish establishment.

If the U.K. is any indication, this Jewish donor base, of the Left will bail, if the Democrats adopt an anti-Israel position. They haven’t done that yet. This could result in another crisis in American politics for most Jews, which support the Republicans. But, of course, only if the Republicans retain their cuckservative globalist ways and support things like non-White immigration. However, if Donald Trump succeeds in reshaping the Republican Party — and we all hope it does — into a White populist party, this will not happen. Mainly Jewish neo-cons in the Chamber of Commerce, both of which are globalists to the core, led the Republican opposition against Trump and this will not soon be forgotten!

[Audience applauds]

But if the G.O.P. becomes a populous party, Jews will have a virtually unsolvable problem, having only a choice between an anti-Israel Rainbow Coalition of the Left and a White populace Right. Both with overtones of anti-Semitism. This is not a choice that they want to be forced to make.

In fact, by far the biggest problem for Jews that has been unleashed by Jewish activism in favor of immigration, multiculturalism, is that it has unleashed a rise in White identity politics, either implicitly, as among most Trump supporters, or explicitly, as among the Alt-Right, which has been the only intellectual movement supporting Trump.

Prominent Jewish writers, like Jonathan Chait, David Brooks at the New York Times, Paul Krugman, New York Times, have been very aware that, or make this claim exactly, that Trump has been successful because of White identity politics. For Chait, Trump is a reincarnation of decades old Jewish bogeyman in American politics Right wing populism. He says, the party has grown increasingly reliant upon White identity politics to supply his votes, which has left an indelible imprint, not only the Republican Party, it’s function, but also it’s form. For Brooks, Trump voters are, quote, “Just going with their gene pool.” A rather bald statement that Trump voters are voting [in] their racial interest.

[30:07]

And then Paul Krugman, describing Trump voters. He said, they were voting for blood and soil patriarchy and racial hierarchy.

Audience: Yeah! [loud applause]

[Image] Portrait of Professor Kevin MacDonald.

Source: http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/heil-trump-this-is-the-alternative-right

Kmac: Would that be ever so! After the election Brooks predicted that the country be split into two factions, with one faction advocating ethnic separatism. Which, of course, many on the Alt-Right are already advocating. Would that were so! In other words ethnic separatism being an absolutely mainstream thing with, you know, sixty million White voters on board with it.

Once White identity politics starts gaining traction, it’s only a matter of time before there is a critical mass of Whites who are dialed into the Jewish role in White dispossession, and that would, as they say, would not be good for the Jews. Psychologically, we expect that racial identity and a sense of racial interests will be more important as Whites become a minority As any psychologist would agree with that. This is especially the case that Whites are routinely subjected to hostility in the educational system, the media and so on. In a very poignant letter, this really struck ??? Actually got it on Twitter from a tweet from Radix. There’s a college student, a college Republican, wrote this letter in response to an article on the American Conservative on the Alt-Right. It wasn’t a very positive article.

He says:

“I am in college and nearly all of my conservative friends are at least sympathetic to the Alt-Right. Even if they don’t openly talk about it, they’re regularly browsing, The Right Stuff, Radix, [audience cheers, clapping] VDare, Occidental Observer and AmRen. How did this come about as. It’s harder for older people to understand, but we younger Whites have been vilified all our lives. Throughout elementary school and high school, I was regularly demonized for being White. I attended public and Christian schools and it was even worse at the latter. And now it’s even more extreme in college. Our entire White race is regularly trashed on a daily basis. … We have the right to oppose our own dispossession and extinction – just as every other race does. It’s time for younger Whites to pick up the gauntlet because we’re the future.”

[Loud expressions of agreement from the audience, applause.]

Now, I suspect that applies to a lot of people here. You’ve seen the hostility. When I grew up you didn’t see anti-White hostility in the schools at all. In fact, we were very proud of our culture, our history and our contributions. Not anymore. Whites tuned into the internet are also aware of greater crime, black on White crime, that sort of thing. We’re aware of affirmative action. In universities you’ve got a situation where you have these minorities that need affirmative action, blacks, Latino’s and so on and then you’ve got Asians at the top and Whites are squeezed in the middle. We really are at a huge disadvantage and it’s hitting the young people the worst. They’re the ones that are losing out here and they are the ones, I think, that are really going to be on our side. I think that’s really what’s happened with the Alt-Right.

Research shows that Whites who see diversity increase — there’s several recent papers on this, academic papers — tend to vote for candidates of the Right. Anxiety over those changes makes plain a lot of Trump supporters. Even if these people won’t admit it. In fact Wall Street Journal reported in counties in Iowa and Wisconsin a change from Obama to Trump, were in the areas of the US undergoing the fastest ethnic changes.

So the bottom line is that Jews remade America in their interests, constructing intellectual theories and media messages designed to make White America comfortable with massive non-White immigration and it’s own dispossession. Toward the end of Hillary’s campaign, we were treated to a constant barrage of such messages on the wonders of diversity and inclusiveness. Quote:

“Instead of Trump’s dark and divisive vision, mine is hopeful and inclusive. Mine is big-hearted, not small-minded. It is about lifting people up, not putting them down. … It’s a vision that says, and I believe this with all my heart, we are stronger together.” (Nov 1, 2016)

That was her whole pitch at the end of the election. And an awful lot of White people, most White people, did not listen to that message and that is a very good sign.

But let’s face it, 35–40% of White Americans still buy into it. Far too many. Too many Americans are suckers for idealistic, optimistic rhetoric, full of lofty moralism and entreaties for empathy, and Jewish activists have known this for a long time. As our friend Israel Zangwill said to a Jewish audience in opposition to the immigration restriction law of 1924:

“You must make a fight against this bill; tell them they are destroying American ideals”.

Again, Zangwill knew exactly what buttons to push. That these are idealistic people. Tell them they’re violating their ideals.

[35:23]

But this idealism is part of the psyche of many Whites, and engrained in our culture, blasted out 24/7 by the media and the educational system. Interviews with White protesters horrified by Trump’s victory shows their extreme sense of moral superiority and moral fervor and their genuine belief in the glorious rainbow, kumbaya future of America.

We have to understand these White people and convince them of the moral righteousness of our cause. We have to make them realize that their idealism is suicidal in this situation.

[Image] Jewish “intellectuals“, like Trotsky, with their Communist “utopias” murdered tens of millions.

Multiculturalism is the contemporary version of utopian Marxist rhetoric that was pushed by three generations of Jewish intellectuals: Even after millions of murders and the incarceration of many more millions, they preached that we can look forward to a future this utopian future of a classless society. Now we’re supposed to look forward to the future of blissful ethnic harmony. Despite the long bloody history of ethnic conflict around the world. As with communism these utopias ultimately fail because they’re not based on scientific views of human nature, or on social science research on the costs and consequences of multiculturalism for native populations.

The end result of this Jewish activism has been White flight away from the diversity, the beginnings of a police state, restrictions on free speech and an upsurge of implicit White identity politics. And an urgent need to create an explicitly White identity politics of the Alt-Right. This activism is also resulted in increased conflict — conflict that could ultimately lead to civil war. The protests following trumps the election may only be the beginning. We are entering a very dangerous period. And we can only hope that Donald Trump will actually live up to the expectations of those who voted for him.

Thank you.

[Loud, long applause from the audience.]

Richard: Before I start speaking, I think it would be a good idea to do two things. A brief, say ten minute Q & A with Kevin. Also if you need to use the restroom, if you want to refill your drink before the final speech of the night, this would be a good time to do it.

So, if you have any questions please line up here.

I’m curious, Kevin, about the psychology of you could say, contemporary Jewish consciousness. Of the one traditional way that people in our movement have been critical of Jews, is that it’s a kind of “nationalism for me, but not for thee”. So, “I am an Israeli, I’m an Israeli identitarian, however you Americans must be open and multicultural and so on”. Don’t you think that there is the “Jon Stewart” type Jew that seems to, in a way, genuinely imbibed their own poison? You could say, and that there might be something, some kind of change. I mean, if you look at Jon Stewart over the ten year period, whatever you want to say about him, he was actually the most openly anti-Israel commentator in the mainstream media. And, you know, you could figure out ways to explain that, but there’s something, there seems to be something going on.

Kmac: I think that’s very true. And there are quite, as I was trying to say, there’s a lot of contentiousness down in the Jewish community about Israel. You’ve got web sites, say Mondoweiss, I read that all the time. Very critical of Israel. And they’re very Jewish though. They are trying to identify as Jews. They view themselves as progressive. You’ve got Jewish Forces for Peace and so on. It does exist. And as say, before it really didn’t have an impact on the donors class and so on, and the Democratic Party, but it’s starting to. As Cohen, the demographer was saying, that’s a serious issue.

You know, and the whole boycott divestment sanction thing, very serious now.

[40:00]

So I think that there are these poles now in the Jewish community. They are very upset and, you know, discombobulated here, there’s a lot of contention there. There’s real contention and it’s not easily solvable. It’s not easily solvable. You can’t square the circle on this one. Because as I said, Israel is not going to change. It’s not going to say, “OK we’ll go back to 1967 borders”. It is not going to happen. Give it up! And one of the big things that they were happy about Trump is that he’s even insisting on that. You know, that’s a big deal. So, Israel is going to be what it is. It is going to continue. Just recently the Israeli government approved something where they could take, they could expropriate more Palestinian land, just take it away! Given some money and then move the sellers on. Make make these outposts that have been illegal. Israel is not going to change. But, American Jews have increasing cognitive dissonance, increasing tension with the social justice warriors in the Left. Something has to give here! It can’t continue like that.

Audience member (male): Now, have you looked into, do you think that a large part of the strategy against us, is dumbing us down from young childhood using the mass media, cartoons for education? I mean, you said there are more afraid of intelligent goyim, White, intelligent Whites, than they are of violent Muslims who are less intelligent.

Kmac: Well, yeah I did. There’s a sort of dumbing down. I would characterize it even more as propaganda. I think the schools now, are wall to wall, you know, their teaching materials for kindergarten, the Holocaust and so on! And so it’s pervasive! And what’s amazing is so many young people are getting out and they’re rejecting it pretty quickly. I mean even in 2012 Mitt Romney, a majority of Whites eighteen to twenty nine voted for Romney and not Obama. And this year the same kind of thing happened. So young Whites are not, you know, entirely molded by the educational system. The ones we see on TV breaking windows in Portland and that kind of thing, they’re not the majority I don’t think.

Audience member (male): Yeah, I wonder if you could just comment on two things.

One is the legitimate concern of Muslim immigration to Western countries. But the danger of that just being hijacked by the Zionists and used for their purposes. And, the other thing is the whole fundamentalist Christian Zionist thing. I mean we used to have people like Father Coughlin and Gerald K. Smith. Christianity was not, you know, Christian Zionism. And what do you think about the chances of a return, or a split in Christianity to get back to the kind of Christians that those people were?

Kmac: Yeah, two questions. The first one I agree that, you know, Islamic terrorism and so on, has been used by Jews. They advocate restrictions on free speech, increased police surveillance and all that. Protection for synagogues, greater security. And that’s happened throughout Europe and is happening in this country. One more Supreme Court justice so they can, you know, had Clinton had gotten in, then that would have been the end of the First Amendment, I think. So, there’s no question it plays into their hands and you, … You have all these activists like Pamela Geller, you know, hates Muslims and all this stuff. But, you know, she’s really motivated by Zionism. She’s a strong, strong Zionist. That’s her whole motivation. And it plays into that and, you know, it’s easy to, you know, to generate hate, xenophobia and so on, one when there is so much terrorism from them. So it really works for them. Christian Zionists, these guys are patsies and the organized Jewish community has seen that for a long time. And a lot of the organizations, the Christian Zionist Organization is actually run by Jews, and funded by Jews.

[Image] The Scofield Bible

The whole Scofield Bible is a very interesting story, how that came about. Oxford University Press, Jewish influence getting it published. And a lot of that, and then you had the prestige of Oxford University. It became very, very popular. And you read it and it’s a Zionist tract! You look at all the footnotes and it would have been written by Herzl, or some some radical Zionist! I mean it’s an amazing document. But that’s forming the thinking of an awful lot of American Christians. But the good news is they didn’t, a lot of people said they were going to vote for Ted Cruz and so on in South Carolina and Texas. Well they did in Texas but not in South Carolina, which very critical! Everybody expected Cruz to win his home state, but South Carolina, everybody said that Trump can never win this. Well, the evangelicals voted for Trump! They didn’t put that first, that is a huge thing and I think we’re going forward with that.

[applause]

[45:02]

Audience member (male): Hi Kevin. It’s an honor to ask you a question. My parents immigrated to the US from Israel. My dad was a paratrooper in 67 to 73, and I was raised there very Zionist. Today, the Lukid is kind of left-wing for me. [laughing]

First of all I want to say I really love your work. I read the Occidental Observer very regularly.

I really agree with you that this is, we’re at the cusp of a paradigm shift and something needs to change. And that the Jews are still in this mood where they think they can continue this sort of neo-con mass immigration thing, which is imploding on itself, as we speak.

I would really like to promote a sort of disconnection between the US and Israel because, on one hand, yes, we get aid, we get a foreign policy that’s tailored to our interests. On the other hand, America seems, and not under Donald Trump — that’s one of the reasons I like him in foreign policy. I think he’s going to have a very hands off approach and I want a hands off approach. I’d like to change the attitudes of Jews, but it’s not easy, …

Kmac: It’s not easy, no, …

Audience member (male): We’re a stiff neck people! But in some ways, you know, us better than we know ourselves. But what do you think? What are some persuasive strategies, because honestly, I’ve tried a lot and it is absolutely true that a lot of these Jews believe the double standards. Like, maybe some of them in the elites, they understand and they still pursue it. I’ve talked to many young Jews who were campaigning for Hillary Clinton and they really don’t even understand that their views are totally hypocritical!

Kmac: And that is amazing and I think there’s a high, … [Audience applause] I’ve been been corresponding by email with this gentleman, very interesting.

And, yeah, there’s a lot of hypocrisy and I actually had a chapter on Jewish self-deception and I think it happens. If you are extremely ethnocentric you just can’t see [your] behavior in any kind of bad light, and so on. It’s very hard to change their views on things. I am worried about Trump’s Israel policies. He talks about moving the embassy to Jerusalem, talked about, I guess Huckabee is going to be ambassador, he’s a Christian Zionist. He’s gung-ho for Israel. And that is not good. Steve Bannon is partying with the Zionist Organization of America. These guys are radical!

And he also, you know, he’s associated with David Horowitz. So it suggests that he really is sort of an intense kind of neo-con, kind of guy. And I don’t know where they got idea the he’s anti-Semitic. Weird! I worry much more that he is the reverse.

No, he’s too philosemitic and will not have a reasonable idea of what America’s interests are in the Middle East. So, I don’t, … It’s really a tough, a tough job to think about what we can do to convince Jews. I’ve been thinking about that for a long time! I don’t have any clues on that! [Laughing]

Thank you. [Audience applauds]

Audience member (male): Thank you.

[Image] Portrait of Richard Spencer.

Source: http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/heil-trump-this-is-the-alternative-right

Richard: Let’s take one more question and could Sam and Bill come to the stage.

Oh, that was very gentlemanly.

Audience member (female): Coming from a very, very Christian background, I found it’s almost impossible to criticize Israel and discuss it with my family members or community members. And it seems that among even very, maybe right-wing, you could say, Christians, very socially conservative Christians, they cannot give up this idea that we have to defend and support Israel at all costs. And how can you argue against that in a way that they would understand?

Kmac: That’s a problem and, you know, it’s embedded in this religious ideology and as everybody knows, we’re talking about Jews. But true Christians too, it’s very hard to make religious arguments opposed to what someone believes. There are a couple of people who have written to sort of address within their worldview and language. That’s not me. But they’ve tried to do that, and maybe that is what you have to do. You have to take a religious point of view yourself. And try to, you know, get into their way of thinking, you know, in a way I wouldn’t unsettle them. Because, yeah, I mean it’s dramatic. As I said, seventy nine to seven percent support of Republicans supporting Israel. And Donald Trump, you know, he’s a politician, you simply can’t ignore that. You’re not going to go out and criticize Israel. You’d be crazy to do that. But, you know, there’s a long history where presidents, you know, say all kinds of things in the campaign and then they back out. Obama was a great example. You know, serious Jews hate Obama, because he, you know, seemed to back up and a lot of them called him Israel’s greatest enemy and all that. Which is a bit over the top but, you know, he certainly didn’t do what the Israel lobby wanted. And I think that’s because he’s one of these Zionist leftists, he’s a social justice warrior, he has a little problem with what they’re doing the Palestinians. And so he, you know, he’s sort of honest in that regard.

But, I don’t know how to convince these people. I’ve written a couple of things, but it’s just, it’s not going to appeal to them. Certainly.

Richard: Thank you Kevin.

[audience applause]

[50:42]

[END]

============================================

Click to download a PDF of this post (4.0 MB):

kevin-macdonald-npi-2016-conference-transcript-ver-2

Version History

Version 6: Nov 29, 2016  — Added montage image of some attendees; updated PDF (Ver 2) for download. Fixed typos.

Version 5: Nov 28, 2016  — Added more images; my Intro; PDF for download. Fixed typos.

Version 4: Nov 27, 2016  — Proofread 25 more minutes. Added portraits pics of Kmac and Spencer. Total complete = 51 minutes. TRANSCRIPT now complete.

Version 3: Nov 25, 2016  — Proofread 10 more minutes. Total complete = 25 minutes.

Version 2: Nov 24, 2016  — Proofread 10 more minutes. Added 4 images. Total complete = 15 minutes.

Version 1: Published Nov 23, 2016  — Added rough full transcript. Completed proofreading first 6 minutes of transcript.