Sven Longshanks

Albion Insights

Speech Crime

Tue, May 16, 2023

[In this audio James Allchurch, aka, Sven Longshanks the host of Radio Albion, talks (on Mar 19, 2023) before attending his trial, about the charges against him (inciting racial hate) and how they came about:

“Hope Not Hate complained to the BBC, the BBC complained to an MP and the MP complained to the police about the content on what was then Radio Aryan. This was in 2017.

The arrest and interview was in 2019, but the charges were not filed until 2021 and all except one were different to the podcast topics asked about in the police interview from 2019.”

Since then Sven has been found guilty and is now facing 2 1/2 year in prison for speaking up against multiculturalism and the ongoing dispossession of our lands by non-Whites, engineered by the (((Money Power))) and their traitorous puppet politicians.

– KATANA]

https://www.radioalbion.com/2023/05/albion-insights-speech-crime-ai-031923.html

Published on Tue, May 16, 2023

Description

HomeThe Daily NationalistAlbion Insights: Speech Crime – AI 031923
Albion Insights: Speech Crime – AI 031923
SL12:00
Sven Longshanks talks before attending the trial, about the charges against him and how they came about.
Hope Not Hate complained to the BBC, the BBC complained to an MP and the MP complained to the Police about the content on what was then Radio Aryan. This was in 2017.
The arrest and interview was in 2019, but the charges were not filed until 2021 and all except one were different to the podcast topics asked about in the Police interview from 2019.
Presented by Sven Longshanks
Albion Insights: Speech Crime – AI 031923
Download
The Audiobook archive contains many more Albion Narrations podcasts
See the daily radio schedule for more ethnocentric audio to download
Join the chatroom and follow the feed
Subscribe to Radio Albion on Telegram HERE
Add this http://audio.radioalbion.com:8777/; to your DAB player to listen to Radio Albion
Click for new Shoutcast player
We can accept donations sent to this NEW bitcoin wallet identifier:
bc1qvdwdj6gfruxrt9fre3vhpx650rmwa2p7hu0mg0
We can also accept Etherium to this wallet:
0xDfD578999B6FBc

_____________

TRANSCRIPT QUALITY = 4.5 Stars

1 Star — Poor quality with many errors, contains nonsense text 2 Stars — Low quality with many errors, some nonsense text. 3 Stars — Medium quality with some errors. 4 Stars — Good quality with only a few errors. 5 Stars — High quality with few to no errors.

NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(28:33 mins)

CONTENTS

Sven Longshanks Sentenced to Two and a Half Years in Prison

It’s Multiculturalism That’s Being Criticised

What Led up to Me Being Taken to Court

System Resistance Network 2017

Allegation That Hope Not Hate Made

BBC Makes a Program

MP from Cardiff Calls for Radio Aryan to Be Investigated

Two Years Later, My Door Got Knocked Down by Police in December 2019

Changed the Name of Radio Aryan to Radio Albion

Police Raid by 15 Officers and Equipment Taken

Questioned by Police

Audio Books – the Painted Savages of England, the International Jew

Mark Collett Gets Sven New Equipment

In 2021 Police Serve Sven with 15 New Charges

Going to Court in 2023

Why Waste Energy on Hating Non-Whites?

Our System was Built for Whites, Not Non-Whites with Low IQ

Tension Created When You Have Multiculturalism

You Can’t Change Blacks, Muslims or Jews

Other Groups Are Thriving but Not Whites

The Law Against Incitement to Hate – Legislating Against an Emotion

You’ll Only Be Listening to This If It All Goes Wrong!

Sven Longshanks Sentenced to Two and a Half Years in Prison

top

Hello and welcome to Albion Insights. You’re listening to me, Sven Longshanks streaming at Radio Albion.com. I am recording this today on the 19 March [2023] and the trial is supposed to start tomorrow, where I am accused of either inciting hate, or bearing in mind all the circumstances, hate was likely to be stirred up. And I’m recording this in case everything goes wrong.

There’s obviously no intent to incite hate against anyone. The whole point of the website is to encourage virtue among our people and to pursue legal and democratic means to solve the problems that we see happening in society, problems that we identify as stemming from the government policy of multiculturalism.

It’s Multiculturalism That’s Being Criticised

top

And it’s always been quite clear on the website that it’s multiculturalism that’s being criticised, not the individual peoples, the individual groups. And you certainly can’t blame an individual for the behaviour of a group, because the chances are the individual that you’re going to meet is not going to be responsible for any of the perceived negative behaviour of a group. And that’s not what we’re about.

When we talk about the differences between these different people groups, it’s just to highlight the fact that they are different. They are measurably different, not just in what they look like, but also with just about every statistic you care to look at that there is a different average. There’s a different average IQ, there’s a different age range for being fertile or going through adolescence. There’s different fecundity, there’s different incarceration rates, there’s different blood groups. All sorts of differences that there are between groups.

And obviously we are interested in that. We are nationalists, we are proud of the fact that we are different to these other groups and we wish to preserve that difference. And we think that multiculturalism destroys those differences and prevents the chance for a culture to grow in the way that it would naturally grow if it was on its own.

And that’s why we have all these different unique cultures around the world, different expressions of culture. We lose those unique individual expressions of culture when we have multiculturalism. But I’m sure you already all know that.

What Led up to Me Being Taken to Court

top

So I thought what I would talk about today is how this happened. How this led up to, what led up to me being taken to court.

Well, back in 2019 I was arrested. But the story goes back even earlier than that, really. In 2017, Hope Not Hate went to an MP and told the MP that at Radio Ayran we have been promoting a group called the System Resistance Network. And the System Resistance Network were later designated as a terrorist organisation.

System Resistance Network 2017

top

We had not been promoting System Resistance Network. I had a co-host at the time who was called Alex Davies, and we mentioned System Resistance Network twice in one podcast. He brought them up and said that:

“Their propaganda was very likely illegal and it made him blush, or even made him blush.”

Words to that effect.

The next time we mentioned them, they had vandalised a disabled toilet in Cardiff, I think it was, and we utterly condemned the vandalizing of a toilet.

[03:54]

We said that:

“Anybody that has anything to do with this group is either getting involved with idiots that vandalise things, or is getting involved in a group which has been set up by the State.”

Because nationalists don’t go vandalizing toilets, nationalists don’t go graffitiing, badly drawn swastikas places, nationalists don’t go desecrating graves. All of these misplaced ideas that the public have about nationalists, they’re all false. And instances like that, most of the time they’re hate crime hoaxes. They’re carried out by people hoping to make something like that look like a “hate crime”.

So we thought it could have been two reasons. It could have been that the State trying to set up an organisation. And it did turn out in the end that people that joined this organisation were being told that they had to carry out a ridiculous act like vandalizing a toilet.

Allegation That Hope Not Hate Made

top

So, I mean, it does look as if it may well have been a State operation, or the Secret Service may have been involved in there encouraging people to do these silly things so that they could then take them to court afterwards. Either way, we told people to have nothing to do with this organisation, which is the complete opposite of the allegation that Hope Not Hate made.

So Hope Not Hate went to, I think it was the MP of Cardiff. I’d never heard of him before. Doughty, I think his second name is. Don’t know what his first name is. But they went to this MP and they told this MP that we had been promoting this group, Radio Aryan had been. So this MP went to the police and the police said:

“Well, if there’s any crime that’s been carried out, we assure you there will be charges brought against them for this crime.”

BBC Makes a Program

top

The BBC wrote to me and they asked me about, … Just another point, the BBC made this program, and not once did they actually play any of the podcasts where I allegedly said anything positive about System Resistance Network, or whether Alex, or anybody at Radio Aryan, it was at the time, said anything about people should join this group, because we didn’t. And the BBC didn’t play any either. Although that’s what they alleged throughout the program.

MP from Cardiff Calls for Radio Aryan to Be Investigated

top

As I say, they got this MP then to call for Radio Aryan to be investigated. That was in 2017. And at the time I made a podcast in response to this, pointing this out that I’ve gone back, had a look at the podcasts at the time that they were referring to, and there was nothing positive said about this group.

So then we just carried on with Radio Aryan. I thought, should I go to the police station and say:

“Look, this is a false allegation that’s been made. You’re welcome to check out the podcast.”

But I thought:

“Well, they’re likely to say, ‘Well, who are you?’”.

If I say:

“Well, I’m Sven Longshanks.”

They’ll say:

“Well, anybody could be Sven Longshanks could say that.”

Or they might say:

“Well, we’ve never heard of you.”

I mean, which police organisation do you go to? Which police station would you go to for something like that?

[06:50]

So, yeah, I just left it at that. I thought:

“Well, we’re not inciting any hate, we’re not doing anything wrong here.”

We’re identifying multiculturalism as what’s wrong. We’re not directing people to attack minorities or anything ridiculous like that. We’re just talking about issues in society which are caused by multiculturalism.

Two Years Later, My Door Got Knocked Down by Police in December 2019

top

So two years later, my door got knocked down in December 2019! And shortly before that September 2019, I’d organised the first Patriotic Alternative Conference with Mark Collett. And Patriotic Alternative was unveiled to the world at that conference.

Changed the Name of Radio Aryan to Radio Albion

top

And as well, at that time I changed the name of Radio Aryan to Radio Albion. The reason why it was called Radio Aryan in the first place is because, and it said this on the website, is because the word Aryan, the root word, comes from a meaning of “noble and honourable” and it is also used to refer to White people. It’s a fairly old word. And it’s more accurate than saying European because we talk about history here at Radio Albion and we often talk about pre-Roman history.

We talk about history in the Near East and in India and all these places. And you can’t say that the people there were European, because they didn’t originate in Europe, they were Indo-European. And the old word for that was “Aryan”.

So you can’t say Europeans were in the Indus River Valley civilisation in 2000 BC, because they weren’t, but they were White people.

So it was accurate to say Aryan. But Aryan, of course, isn’t very politically correct and of course it brings up negative connotations. It even brings up negative connotations with prison gangs, which of course we didn’t want. It’s not so snappy to call it “Radio Indo-European” though, is it?

So we changed it to Radio Albion, which I would suggest shows that if the website was inciting hate and was likely to stir up hate, which means likely to increase in hate, the website would not have changed its name from Radio Aryan to Radio Albion. It would have gone in the opposite direction, it would have stayed at Radio Aryan and it would have been by that time, it would have been inciting people to take up arms and attack people, which it completely wasn’t! We go ahead and in the complete opposite direction to that.

We just started doing our Greatest Britain series with Lord Robert Baden Powell, and I think we looked at Captain Cook at that point. And that was something that I wanted to do for a long time, was bring history into it.

[09:31]

Police Raid by 15 Officers and Equipment Taken

top

So the police came round, they kicked the front door down, and I had half a dozen of them in my bedroom. I think there was about 15 of them in all. And they took me off to a police station somewhere, I think it was somewhere in Cardiff. And they basically went through my house, took everything that they wanted. They took over a hundred different items! Took computers, microphones. They took things that had nothing to do with the online radio, the internet radio. They took PA speakers. They took a large amplifier, a PA amplifier. Clearly nothing whatsoever to do with digital radio.

I mean, this is just amplification equipment that they took. They even took rags out of my car! Very bizarre! They took all sorts of stuff.

Questioned by Police

top

And then they questioned me. They said:

“We need to question you about this.”

And I thought:

“Well, I’ve done nothing wrong, and I know that my beliefs are not illegal.”

I believe what nationalism is, it is a creed. It’s something that informs every part of your life. The the way that you hold yourself, the way that you look at things. Even the things that you eat, can be related to nationalism. The clothes that you wear, the way that you look at history, the way that you look at religion, it’s all through nationalist lenses, which I’ve always thought:

“Well, it’s a creed, and you are supposed to be protected if you have a creed.”

And I told the police this, and I gave them an interview, and I answered all their questions. They asked me questions about audiobooks that I had done on lynching in the south. And I said:

“Well, that’s a book from, I think, the late 1800s, early 1900s.”

And I said:

“It’s all about statistics, it’s all accurate.”

And it’s basically pointing out that White people were also lynched as well as blacks. And the reason for these lynchings was because law and order had broken down, and because it was 100 miles away from a court.

And if you had people living 100 miles away from a court, and particularly if you had freed slaves there, and they had been riled up by the abolitionists, one of them might carry out a massacre. And then what you had to do was you had to punish that swiftly, which is what happened.

And you also had White people that were badly behaved, and if they carried out a heinous crime, they would be lynched as well. And it was purely and simply because they didn’t have a jury there, they didn’t have a judge there, or a court. So they effectively had to carry out justice themselves. That’s why they were all present at these lynchings.

[12:12]

Audio Books – The Painted Savages of England, The International Jew

top

But they asked me about that they asked me about an audiobook that I did called The Painted Savages of England, which was written by a vicar. A vicar in the Church of England. And the painted savages of England that he’s talking about were Picts. It was a quote from Julius Caesar. But the police seemed to think that it was to do with immigrants.

What else did they ask me about? They asked me about the International jew series, which was written by Henry Ford, which I said was a history of America at the turn of last century. Lots of bits of history that don’t get told in the mainstream books. And it wasn’t me narrating that, though I did host it. I said yes. This is me, Sven Longshanks. And this is Radio Albion. And it was Radio Aryan, you can call it either.

So I gave them an interview. They said, :

“You’ve accounted for yourself very well.”

They said. And they said:

“And if everything that you say checks out, then you don’t have the charges against you.”

So I thought:

“Right, well, sweet then!”

They took everything of mine, they’ll be able to see very clearly that any things such as violence, graffiti, property damage, they’ll see very clearly in my private social media that I’ve condemned, that sort of thing. There had just recently been something of that order that had happened in Denmark, and I was having a private conversation with someone from Denmark and saying:

“How awful it was, how terrible it was.”

So the police could see from my social media that I’m not somebody that supports violence, not someone that supports vandalism.

And I’ve always identified multiculturalism as being the problem. So I thought:

“Well, they’re bound to just drop the charges, aren’t they?”

Mark Collett Gets Sven New Equipment

top

And I didn’t want people to know what had happened either. The radio obviously went quiet for 24 hours, I think it was, and I phoned Mark Collett up straight away and said:

“Mark, can you order me a new computer, order me a new microphone, the police have taken everything, I’ll pay you back for it, but I need to get back online again as quickly as possible.”

So Mark very kindly ordered the equipment that I need, got it delivered to my house, and I was back up and running again within 48 hours. And I just said:

“Oh, we had technical problems yesterday.”

Didn’t think anything more of it, really.

And then we had Covid, and I was waiting for them to say, well, we checked through all your social media, there’s no evidence of you inciting violence or trying to hurt people or showing support for anything illegal.

[14:50]

In 2021 Police Serve Sven with 15 New Charges

top

And then at the end of Covid in 2020, I think it was, might have been 2021, because we’re in 2023 now, aren’t we? In 2021 they came to my door again, the police, and they said:

“Oh, we’ve got to serve you with these charges.”

So they hit me with 15 charges. None of them to do with the trouble with lynching in the South, none of them to do with the painted savages of England, none of them to do with Henry Ford’s, the International Jew. 15 charges on completely different podcasts this time!

So from an original start of Hope Not Hate, saying we were promoting System Resistance Network in podcasts, which we weren’t, and an MP then saying to the police:

“Will you investigate this organisation please, or whatever it is.

Radio Ayran at the time. To the police wanting to charge me on these other podcasts that they found, these audiobooks that I gave them an interview about.

And then they obviously decided:

“No, we won’t charge him for that. We’ll charge him for 15 completely different podcasts that we haven’t mentioned at all in the three hour interview.”

I gave them. So it’s all extremely strange. It’s like as if they couldn’t find a problem with what it is alleged that I’d done. They couldn’t find podcasts saying that we supported System Resistance Network, so they thought:

“Well, we’ll let the police have a go.”

And the police said I had accounted for myself very well. And they didn’t charge me with what the police had asked me about.

And then they come up with these 15 other charges! Which which seems to me as if they’re saying:

“Well, he was able to answer the police. Let’s see if he can answer a barrister these questions?”

Going to Court in 2023

top

So I’m now going to be going to court. It’s two weeks that this is supposed to be going on for. As I say, I have not got a hateful bone in my body. There is certainly not any intent to incite hate and the only way you could misconstrue things to claim that we were trying to incite hate is to take things out of context.

What I mean by that is to take things away from a website which makes it very clear that the solutions we are outlining are solutions to multiculturalism. And hide that from the jury, and then show the jury podcasts, which talk about things like Enoch Powell’s “Rivers of Blood” speech, and highlight the bits from that that have actually come true today. And then say:

“Oh, he’s doing this because he wants to encourage people to hate non-Whites and to resent non-Whites!”

Why Waste Energy on Hating Non-Whites?

top

And of course, that’s not the reason. What would be the point in doing that? What would be the point in getting people to waste their energy on hating non-Whites or trying to do something to non-Whites? It’s not non-Whites that are responsible for the government’s policy, is it? It’s the government! You’re never going to get changes made to government policy by taking out your frustrations on immigrants or minorities or illegal asylum seekers. It’s just ridiculous! They’re not the ones that are making these government policies that are having these negative effects. It’s the government! And we’ve always been really clear about that.

[18:17]

And if you talk about differences that people have, inbuilt differences, you’re effectively saying:

“You can’t really hold these people to blame for that.”

If you’re saying:

“Well, you’ve got one people group here that has a lower average intelligence and higher rate of incarceration.”

You don’t hate those people. You feel sorry for them! And you say:

“Well, perhaps you should be a little bit more lenient on them. The fact is that they carry out more crime because they’ve got a lower IQ and they can’t change that. That’s the way they are.”

And in actual fact, that is a defense, isn’t it? In America, if you got a low IQ, you can’t actually be executed for your crimes. It’s a mitigating factor.

And if you also have a group which is more likely to commit crime, it means it’s more likely to be the victims of crime. And you’re not saying everyone in the group is a criminal, you’re just saying that they have more than their fair share of criminals in that group. And even by saying it like that, they have more than their fair share. You’re going to feel sorry for the ones that aren’t because they’re going to have to put up with the ones that are! There’s going to be a lot of law abiding people in that group, but they’re going to have to put up with a lot of unlawful criminal types in that group.

So you’re not going to hate them, are you? You’re going to cut them a bit of slack and you’re going to feel sorry for them.

Another way you’re going to look at it is, well, if they’ve had that, they’ve always had that and they will be the ones best placed to know how to deal with that.

Our System was Built for Whites, Not Non-Whites with Low IQ

top

And that’s why we get these problems today. That’s why black people will say:

“The White man’s legal system penalises us, it’s racist. More of us end up in prison. It doesn’t work for us!”

And they’re quite right, it doesn’t work for them, because it’s not their system. Because they didn’t develop that system. That system was developed for a group with a certain average of crimes, with a certain average of IQ. That’s what that system was developed for. That’s why it seems to people that don’t have that same IQ don’t have that same average of crimes, it seems like they’re being picked on because of the system.

Whereas if they were just amongst their own people, it wouldn’t happen, would it? They wouldn’t be able to say:

“Well, it’s racist against me!”

Because the system would have been developed by black people and it would have been Instituted by black people.

[20:35]

And this is what we see. We see particularly black people, but all non-Whites saying that they want to see themselves represented. And you see that when you see non-Whites accepting awards like the Oscars. And they say:

“Well, I’m doing this for all the younger versions of me that never saw themselves represented on the screen, never had somebody to look up to, never had somebody to show them that it is possible to get to these positions.”

Tension Created When You Have Multiculturalism

top

And that’s the same for everyone! Everyone wants to see themselves represented. Everybody feels most contented and comfortable when they are around their own people. And everybody feels slightly on edge when they’re among another group of people with a different culture and different languages. It just means that everybody is in a sense of heightened tension when you have multiculturalism.

So you see groups like Black Lives Matter advocating for more black judges, more black teachers, more black police, and that’s the reason why they want that it’s because if they were just surrounded by their own people, they couldn’t then say:

“This system is racist!”

They couldn’t then blame White people for it. And the chances are they would develop a system which actually dealt with the problems. They would probably develop a way that had a much swifter execution of justice than the way that we have, where you can end up waiting one, two, three years before you actually go to court.

There’s also the fact that a lot of black people will refuse to plead guilty anyway because they think that there’s a chance that they’ll be found not guilty. So even if there’s a lot of evidence against them, they will still plead not guilty, which can lead to them getting longer prison sentences.

You Can’t Change Blacks, Muslims or Jews

top

Again, it’s because the system was developed by White people and it’s been applied to black people. That’s the root of the problem. You can’t change black people!

It’s the same with jews! You can’t change jews! Jews have been jews for thousands of years. That’s the way they are, and it serves them very well. It has meant that they have retained their ethnic uniqueness. It means that they have retained their ethnicity whilst being a minority amongst the majority. They have retained their ways of doing things and their separate religion, and they’ve done very well without having physical force. They’ve managed to gain the same amount of influence and power as the majority has.

So you can’t say that what jews are doing is wrong for jews. It’s good for jews. But there may be aspects of it that aren’t so good for other groups in a society when it’s multicultural and it’s shared with jews. For instance, things like usury. That’s good for the jews, that is good for them to make money for their own group with, and they refuse to engage in usury amongst each other.

[23:33]

But if you’re a non-jew and you’re paying usury, you can end up getting yourself into debt. It’s not so good for you!

You can look at Muslims. You can say:

“Well, Muslims really don’t like to see images.”

They see pretty much all images as idols and particularly not images of Muhammad. And that’s fine. If they don’t want to see images, they don’t want to see images of Muhammad, that’s fine. That’s part of their culture. It has served them very well for thousands of years, or over a thousand years, I should say.

But then if you put them into a territory with another group that does like images, does like pictures, does like drawing cartoons, you’re going to have friction, aren’t you? Because you can have one group that says:

“Well, this is really offensive. It’s so offensive to me that you’ve got this picture of Muhammad there, that some of us may even think that that requires a death penalty. It’s that serious!”

Yet then you have Christians who are quite happy to draw pictures of Jesus, quite happy to draw pictures of Muhammad.

So you have this conflict there! Because not everybody is the same. And you can’t say, well, the Muslims are wrong for thinking that because I’m not a Muslim, I can’t judge Muslims.

The only way you can judge a group is by whether it’s actions are conducive for that group. Are jews thriving? You have to say:

“Yes, jews are thriving!”

Are Muslims thriving? Yes, Muslims are thriving. Are black people thriving? Yes. There are more black people alive today than there’s ever been alive before in history. They most certainly are thriving!

Other Groups are Thriving but Not Whites

top

Are White people thriving? Well, no, we’re not thriving, are we? We’re not even producing enough to replace ourselves. And that’s the root of the problem. The criticism is of White people! And the criticism is of the multicultural policy. The criticism is not of these other groups and we are not encouraging hatred of these other groups.

A few years ago, we may have used folk taxonomy, we may have used some language that people might find a little bit offensive, but it’s no different to the language that you would hear down the pub just from people talking about things and talking about these different groups. We do shorten people’s names for these groups. We call the Scottish people, we call them Scots.

And people did used to shorten the word that we used to call people from Asia. No offence is meant by it. It’s just shortening a word. And that is what they’re going to try and use to say I’m inciting hate, is because I use just normal language to describe these things rather than politically corrected language. Not because I was actually encouraging people to go out and attack non-Whites or anything like that, but simply because I used language which wasn’t particularly “polite”.

I mean, that’s the situation that we are at today.

[26:36]

The Law Against Incitement to Hate – Legislating Against an Emotion

top

If you want to have a law against incitement to hate, okay, but what is the point of that law? Well, that law is there to prevent people encouraging others to have a feeling of hatred that is so much and so strong that they might go out and physically attack someone. That has to be the sort of hate that they’re talking about, because otherwise the law is being used to try and legislate against an emotion. And say:

“Oh no! You can’t feel hate!”

Well, everybody feels hate. The point of the matter is, is it hatred to a sufficient extent that would make you want to go out and hurt someone? That’s the point. It has to be that that’s what the law was intended. It was to prevent people from inciting that sort of a hatred, not simply using terms that some people might find impolite or some people might find offensive. And that is going to be more likely to make the listeners hate the person saying those terms. It’s not going to make people want to go out and harm black people.

You’ll Only Be Listening to This If It All Goes Wrong!

top

Anyway, I’ve got a lot of noise outside now. What I wanted to do was to let everybody know what had happened, how this came about. It was nothing to do with Patriotic Alternative. As I say, it goes back to 2017 really. And you’ll only be listening to this if it all goes wrong! Hopefully it doesn’t go wrong and hopefully I get found not guilty.

If they do find me guilty and you are listening to this, I have made arrangements so that Radio Albion should continue with the Orthodox Nationalist Parish of the Patriots and Patriotic Alternative. So do stay checking out the website because there will be new content on there.

Okay, thank you very much for listening. And I will be back with you when I next can be. God bless and hail victory!

[28:32]

END

top

============================================

Comments

top

==========================

See Also

top

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett at The Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — Transcript

Patriotic Weekly Review – with Blair Cottrell – Dec 4, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Dangerfield – Talking Tough with Mark Collett – Mar 28, 2020 — Transcript

============================================

PDF Download

top

• Total words in post = 5,280
• Total words in transcript = 4806
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB): (Available later)

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3: Sat, May 20, 2023 – Added Table of Contents with links.

Version 2: Fri, May 19, 2023 — Minor corrections.

Version 1: Thu, May 18, 2023 — Published post.

Mark Collett

British Justice – Wrong Speak Worse Than Child Abuse

TITLE 2

Fri, Apr 7, 2023

[Mark Collett, leader of the pro-White British movement, Patriotic Alternative, on the prosecution/persecution of Allchurch says:

“The recent trial of nationalist podcaster James Allchurch AKA Sven Longshanks, who was recently found guilty of stirring up racial hatred, exposes the fact that courts in Britain are now punishing ‘speech crimes’ more harshly than they do crimes involving child sexual abuse – resulting in THOUSANDS of paedophiles walking FREE from British courts. Find out the truth of how the British justice system is being perverted and how you can help James Allchurch in the wake of his conviction for speech crimes.”

– KATANA]

https://odysee.com/@MarkCollett:6/20230407—BRITISH-JUSTICE—Wrong-Speak-WORSE-than-Child-Abuse:8

Published on Fri, Apr 7, 2023

Description

BRITISH JUSTICE – Wrong Speak WORSE than Child Abuse
April 7, 2023
2,047 views

266
3
Support
Save
3 Reposts
Share
Mark Collett

@MarkCollett
13K followers
Join
Follow
The recent trial of nationalist podcaster James Allchurch AKA Sven Longshanks, who was recently found guilty of stirring up racial hatred, exposes the fact that courts in Britain are now punishing ‘speech crimes’ more harshly than they do crimes involving child sexual abuse – resulting in THOUSANDS of paedophiles walking FREE from British courts. Find out the truth of how the British justice system is being perverted and how you can help James Allchurch in the wake of his conviction for speech crimes.
HELP JAMES ALLCHURCH:
https://www.radioalbion.com/2023/04/how-you-can-help.html
Ways you can help contribute to my work:
BitCoin: bc1qzgjz953f4gznway0hvz6lx360yd2autdkwf6nu
Etherium: 0xb44739a8f2c57Cad38F96Aab8F2a0cA18258A7bA
BitCoin Cash: qpaaukrttfvq0j99gfl43hhs5q0tmhzfevkhp3r2c9
Monero: 42qypZQGMzNfFa5yXBxkqxL4iDw5cmzbtCC81dKcQbMrhLrsJUYAFSsLs9Um4hG32R5GfaqfgGj7oR6ZJ7pGyaY3FFu9HKD
You can also donate to my work via Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
My book, The Fall of Western Man is now available. It is available as a FREE eBook and also in hardback and paperback editions.
The Official Website:

http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

FREE eBook download:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3cctZ95PDYZTnRjSUd5VUtRR2c/view
Hardback Edition:
https://www.lulu.com/shop/mark-collett/the-fall-of-western-man/hardcover/product-23388841.html
Paperback Edition:
http://amzn.eu/9LaS7HN
PLEASE NOTE: If you wish to debate with me in the comments about anything I have said, I welcome that. However please listen to the complete podcast and ensure you argue with the points I have made. Arguments that simply consist of nonsense such as “what gives you the right to judge” or “I’m a [insert religious affiliation] and you should be ashamed of yourself” or other such vacuous non-arguments will simply be ridiculed.
free speech; hate speech; James allchurch; sven longshanks
204.31 MB
More
9.51K
40 comments

_____________

TRANSCRIPT QUALITY = 5 Stars

1 Star — Poor quality with many errors, contains nonsense text 2 Stars — Low quality with many errors, some nonsense text. 3 Stars — Medium quality with some errors. 4 Stars — Good quality with only a few errors. 5 Stars — High quality with few to no errors.

NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(16:43 mins)

[Intro imagery and music]

So as many people within nationalist circles will already know, James Allchurch, aka, Sven Longshanks, the owner of radioalbion.com, was last week found guilty on ten counts of stirring up racial hatred in relation to podcasts that he published over a two-year period on the aforementioned Radio Albion website – which at the time was called Radio Aryan. These podcasts were published back in 2016 and have now been removed from the site.

Now before we go on, I want to stress, James was charged with 15 counts of stirring up racial hatred, and in fact; he was found not guilty on five, and of the ten counts he was found guilty on, all were majority verdicts, meaning that the jury were not united in the decision to return a guilty verdict. In fact, one juror felt that James was not guilty of all counts and held out, refusing to go along with the other jurors. However, this was not enough, as in 1967 the British Government changed the law making it so juries no longer had to reach unanimous verdicts.

During the trial James was cross examined by a member of the King’s Counsel – the most senior level of legal representation in the country – and he held his own. As such I feel that James did himself proud, and the fact that he pleaded not guilty and fought the case to the end, winning over one juror and ensuring a third of the charges were dismissed, was, to say the least, impressive!

What makes this even more impressive was the fact that James’s legal team was changed at the last moment. Just days before his trial was due to commence, James was informed that the legal team he had been working with and preparing his case with for well over a year, were held up on another trial that was running over it’s allocated time. This meant that with just days to go an all-new legal team that were largely unfamiliar with the case were draughted in as James’s defence.

I find this unbelievable, and think it’s very unfair that the case wasn’t rescheduled to a later date so James could be represented by the team that he had been preparing with for well over a year.

I am not about to say that the legal team that represented him did a bad job, I am sure they did the best they could with the ridiculously short period of time they had to prepare, but I think it’s inconceivable that they could have done as good a job as a team that had been preparing for well over 12 months!

I am bemused as to why this case wasn’t pushed back and why the judge decided to hear the case – rejecting calls to move the trial date to a time when James’s original legal team that he had worked with for over a year were able to attend.

So, what do I think of the actual trial and the verdict?

Well firstly, let’s talk about the law itself. I don’t think these laws are just and I reject the idea that speech laws like this are necessary. Do I believe that any laws that place restrictions on speech should exist? Well yes actually, in two circumstances:

If someone is directly calling for violence or explicitly demanding that someone harms another person, the person issuing those calls should be prosecuted.

Also, if someone spreads known falsehoods about another person in order to damage that person’s reputation, that case should also be dealt with through legal channels, either through the criminal courts or through private civil cases.

However, there were already laws in the UK dealing with both genuine cases of incitement and the spreading of malicious falsehoods that predate any of the draconian and anti-free speech “race” laws passed by successive post-war governments.

The laws that James was charged under – in short, the race hate laws – are a perfect example of a scandalous and tyrannical attempt by successive governments in order to restrict freedom of speech on certain topics that pertain to race and ethnicity. These laws are designed to both prevent discussion and to instil fear in normal people who wish to raise perfectly legitimate political or social points.

What’s more, when these cases are brought to court; they aren’t really based on evidence as such. These trials end up being based on the opinion of the jury as to what the intent of the defendant was and fundamentally what affect the words that the defendant used would have on other people. This is a very murky way to conduct a trial. And in legal terms it is more in line with a Soviet-esque show trial than anything that could really be called “justice”.

Such trials aren’t like a murder trials where real evidence: DNA, fingerprints, CCTV footage or other physical and visual evidence will be presented and reviewed in a cold, hard and factual manner. Was the defendant seen or pictured at the scene of the crime? Was the DNA of the victim found on the defendant’s clothing? Were the defendant’s fingerprints found on the handle of the knife recovered from the crime scene? All of this is directly quantifiable.

However, in “race hate” trials, most of the proceedings are based on opinion – which is always governed to some degree by emotion. What do you think the defendant was thinking when he made that speech? How do you feel someone else would feel if they heard the defendant’s speech? How would someone be influenced by the defendant’s speech? Would the defendant’s speech by likely to make someone else feel a certain way?

Then throw in the fact that these juries don’t truly understand the law in question and that all of the jurors will have their own political, social and religious beliefs, and you have a trial which is based on anything but fact.

This heavy slant toward emotion and opinion turns such “race hate” trials into a mixture of a witch hunt and a reality TV show, where the defendant isn’t actually tried on the basis of a number of pieces of quantifiable evidence, but instead, proceedings are based more around whether the defendant is a “bad” person and whether the words said by the defendant could effectively cause other’s to be “bad people”.

It’s all very Orwellian and was designed to be so.

And remember: I’ve been part of one of these trials. I was once charged with 8 counts of stirring up racial hatred, so I know first-hand that much of any such a trial is spent not presenting evidence, but instead the prosecutor attempts to poison a jury into believing that holding certain views is reason enough to condemn the defendant to a prison sentence.

And as we live in a politically correct, liberal and progressive world, one where Judges are appointed due to “political merit”, those found guilty during such reality TV witch trials are likely to be served much harsher sentences than those convicted of real crimes – such as rape, child abuse and paedophilia.

And that’s not a joke, that’s not an overreaction, that’s not hyperbole.

The judge presiding over James Allchurch’s case, one Huw Rees, reportedly said the following after the guilty verdicts were read. And I quote:

“What I have heard over the last fortnight I regard as a stain on humanity.”

End quote. The Judge then reportedly went on to state, and again I quote:

“My intention is to send your client to prison immediately. And that sentence will be measured in years, not in months.

 

I make it very clear to you that you should prepare yourself for a sentence of immediate imprisonment.”

End quote. Yes, a stain on humanity and a prison sentence measured in years not months, pending a pre-sentence report that is.

However, let’s have a quick look at this judge’s previous record and see how he has dealt with other cases, what sentences he passed down for other crimes and where he decided to show mercy. Mercy for crimes, that I feel are far more severe and far more stomach churning than simply espousing opinions that the state deems “offensive”.

The first case is from 2022 and relates to a Muslim cleric who sexually abused a young girl in his care, I read this from Wales Online, and I quote:

“A trusted imam who raped a young schoolgirl in a mosque has been given an absolute discharge due to his dementia. Khandaker Mohammed Rahman pushed the child into a washroom and attacked her, and then went on to sexually assault her on further occasions when she attended the religious and cultural centre by touching her breasts and bum.”

End quote. The second case is from 2015, and relates to a convicted paedophile who worked at a primary school in Wales and was found to have over 600 images of child porn on his computer, I read from the Independent. And I quote:

“A 55-year-old primary school caretaker walked free from Cardiff Crown court, claiming possessing over 600 child abuse images was ‘just a morbid curiosity’.

 

Michael Pendry, a Cardiff primary school caretaker who lived on the grounds, was caught by police in possession of 658 child abuse images, which he admitted he had looked at and shared with other paedophiles online ‘for years’.

Yesterday, Judge Huw Rees decided not to award Pendry a custodial term but said instead he would take a ‘risk’ in sentencing him to three years community service.”

End quote. So, whilst James’s words were apparently a “stain on humanity” and should only be punished by a custodial sentence measured in years not months, the same judge allowed an elderly Muslim child rapist to walk free due to medical reasons and allowed a paedophile school caretaker to also walk free, because, well, I don’t know! I actually haven’t a clue why anyone would let a monster like that, who possesses images of children being sexually abused, walk free. And bear in mind, that 25 of the images possessed by the paedophile Michael Pendry fell into the worst category of abuse. But he still walked free from court.

And if you think this is an isolated case, it’s not. This isn’t just one judge making bad calls, this is mirrored across the entire legal system.

And I’ve made videos on this before, so I will be brief, but here’s a few examples:

Darren Phelps from Swindon walked free from court last year after being found with over 12,000 indecent images of children on his computer, I read from the Swindon Advertiser, and I quote:

“Darren Phelps stored images of children as young as one or two years old for his own sexual pleasure, and even posed as a child in a chat room and uploaded some of his cache.

 

He was chastised by the judge who told him ‘it is people like you that create the industry’ for child abuse – although he was allowed to walk out of the courtroom minutes later after being given a community order.”

End quote. In 2021 a married engineer from Liverpool walked free from court after being found guilty of possessing over 2,000 images of child porn, I read this from the Liverpool echo, and I quote:

“A shamed civil engineer walked free from court with his ‘supportive’ wife after he downloaded child rape photos.

 

Over the span of 12 years, 33-year-old James Shaw secretly amassed more than 2,000 indecent images of children.

The paedophile’s sick collection included files showing victims of child sexual abuse as young as four.”

End quote. And in 2020, a former Labour Councillor, Roger Spackman, walked free from court after being found with over one million child abuse images on his 68 electronic devices. I read this from the Daily Mail, and I quote:

“A paedophile Labour councillor who worked in a children’s home has walked free despite being caught with over one million child porn images – including of 12-year-old girls being raped.

 

Roger Spackman, 50, who was a Labour councillor on Exeter City Council until his arrest in 2017, worked at a secure children’s home at the time he started collecting the enormous hoard of images.

Exeter Crown Court heard that he was part of an underground internet network called ‘The Other Place’.”

End quote. So, I think it’s clear that cases of paedophiles walking free aren’t rare – in fact it’s now becoming the “new normal”. What’s more, these cases involving paedophiles are cases based on actual evidence, unlike cases involving so-called “hate” speech. A defendant either owns such images or they don’t, and if they do, they should be going to jail, or in an ideal world, be fed to badgers!

But this isn’t an ideal world. It’s a sickening and perverse world where words and opinions can land you a longer prison sentence than abusing children. Which is all very telling. When you distil this down to its base level, the highly politicised judicial system finds holding the wrong opinions a greater crime than child abuse.

But oh, I hear the liberals cry:

“How many people were offended by the words of James Allchurch? How many members of ethnic minority communities heard his podcasts and were deeply hurt? What psychological damage did James cause people of colour?”

Well, the shocking answer to this, is in fact, zero!

During James’s trial it emerged that not a single person of colour or minority complained to the police about anything James had said. The complaint was brought to the police by his Member of Parliament after he was pressured to do so by Hope Not Hate.

So, if you were still on the fence to whether this was a political prosecution, then I think that little piece of evidence seals the deal. But weighing all the evidence, I probably wouldn’t call this a “political prosecution”, as it’s not a prosecution, it’s “political persecution”.

James Allchurch, A 51-year-old disabled man who was dragged before a court with a legal team that had only had days to prepare for the trial is now facing years in prison for saying something that said court deemed offensive to minorities when not a single member of a minority community complained. And all this is all taking place when that very same court has let paedophiles walk free!

This isn’t justice! This is an inversion of justice!

Now I know many people listening would like to help. And James, aka, Sven Longshanks does need help. You can always make a financial contribution to his cause, or you can assist him with his pre-sentencing report by providing a witness statement as to his good character. There is now a page on radioalbion.com which details the ways in which you can help him, it’s linked in the description below.

Thank you for your support. And we wish James all the best for his sentencing later this month.

[16:43]

END

top

============================================

Odysee Comments

top

Mr
4 days ago
Too much, too much fu*king perspective now.
Log in to reply
2
0

Beer Hall Pooch
6 hours ago
The same Lib-Lab-Con Regime that 50% of our tribe insist on voting in every election contrary to all the evidence it is their enemy. The definition of madness: doing the same thing over and over again but expecting different outcomes.
We are easily not saving half of our tribe who are wedded to the System. At this point I say, fk em. Examples need to be set and they need to suffer their actions if they are to learn. They are dragging us all down into their private hell.
White or not -fk em. I’m sick of excusing them. Sven is doing time because the electorate have given their permission to the enemy. It’s really that simple.
Log in to reply
2
0

@PureNomad
4 days ago
Guilty of having an opinion that counters the (((globalists))) narrative.
Log in to reply
42
0
Hide replies
Asadafa
4 days ago
“guilty” of being correct.
Log in to reply
22
0

@Rumrage
3 days ago
guilty of infringing noahide laws
Log in to reply
1
0

@BritishGammon
4 days ago
People used to say “trust in British justice, it’s the best in the world.”
I don’t hear people saying that anymore!
Log in to reply
32
0
Hide replies
Beer Hall Pooch
6 hours ago
The whole System needs to be SMASHED. Anyone with loyalty to it at this stage is a partisan and collaborator -White or not.
Log in to reply
1
0

@EndJewishPrivilege
4 days ago
Off-topic: “RAF boss ready to test limit of the law to improve diversity”
https://news.sky.com/story/raf-boss-says-he-is-ready-to-test-the-limit-of-the-law-to-improve-diversity-in-the-force-leaked-transcript-reveals-12851128

RAF boss ready to test ‘the limit of the law’ to improve diversity
byu/wobblebits inunitedkingdom

What we need is a ‘White Strike’: we should stop contributing to the anti-White (anti-Indigenous British) system. Stop paying taxes. Stop supporting anti-White companies. A day will come when non-Whites in our armed forces will turn against the UNARMED and DEFENCELESS Indigenous British.
Log in to reply
27
0
Hide replies

@vettekid407
4 days ago
I’ve stopped paying taxes a decade ago …so far so good…very risky though. I’ve been selling on eBay during that period but they are required to report my sales to the Federal Government
Log in to reply
13
0

@Esau
4 days ago
Yes, and a worldwide “White strike” would be even better, but it would have to be coordinated, and have lots of committed strikers.
Log in to reply
10
0
Show reply
Beer Hall Pooch
6 hours ago
By far the best comment on this thread.
Log in to reply
Chaz
4 days ago
“This isn’t justice. This is an inversion of justice”
It’s Anarcho-tyranny and it’s psychological warfare designed to condition the masses into accepting heinous acts as the norm.
Log in to reply
22
0
Strawberry_Lynn
4 days ago
00:30
“James was charged with 15 counts of stirring up racial hatred”
NOTHING stirs up “racial hatred” like mass immigration. It’s the ultimate way of doing it. All responsible should be in jail
Log in to reply
16
0
Hide replies

@ゼロHope
4 days ago
When they accuse people of incitement of hatred or violence, it’s an admission of guilt because they believe what they are doing justifies that response if people notice it, thus talking about it logically follows as incitement.
Log in to reply
2
0
Awake since 1997
4 days ago
We must all take DAILY action online AND offline to push back HARD.
Log in to reply
16
0
JimB
4 days ago
The judge in Sven’s case is absolutely disgusting and deserves a jail cell himself. Sadly this is all too common across the entire Western world, and it’s so damn frustrating that these s***libs have managed to metastasize throughout every level of our respective societies like cancers. Unless reversed, we ARE doomed. This corrupt, antiwhite and utterly insane system must be dismantled. With extreme prejudice.
Log in to reply
15
0
Strawberry_Lynn
4 days ago
HATE SPEECH: Statements that the government doesn’t like
Log in to reply
11
0
Asadafa
4 days ago
The speech laws in Europe are a relic of past tyrannies, even if they were reimplemented after humanity’s loss in WWII.
Log in to reply
11
0

@BS2022
4 days ago
Sexual abuse is not an offence with these Freemasons, they condone it. It’s out in the open now.
Log in to reply
10
0

@Grumpole
4 days ago
Truths are now hate speech, everything is inverted, what we deem as evil and perverted these psychopaths see as normal, honesty and truths are abhorrent to the criminal perverted establishment.
Log in to reply
9
0
Lill Frigg main channel
4 days ago
Is this blocked for anyone else?? Since the site got updated half the videos I want to watch are blocked
Log in to reply
7
0
Hide replies

@ShoggyShaggy
4 days ago
Might be because of where you are watching them from. Since I’m in the US I don’t have any restrictions.
Log in to reply
5
0
Hide replies
Lill Frigg main channel
4 days ago
Yeah probably the EU trying to go full north Korea on us.
Log in to reply
2
0

@noreplacement
4 days ago
Sadly predictable. Absolutely disgusting.
Log in to reply
6
0

@ゼロHope
4 days ago
The judges sympathizes with rapists and pedophiles, yet calls the person who has a problem with rape and pedophilia a stain on humanity… thinking hmm… so the judge might very well be possibly be interested in similar hobbies.
Log in to reply
4
0
Hide replies

@MilosM.
19 minutes ago
nah the judge is some out of touch buffoon or likely being paid by higher authority to conduct such sentences.
Log in to reply
Randy McDowell
4 days ago
Absolutely appalling. That poor Man.
Log in to reply
5
0
MichaelB
3 days ago
This demonstrates that the British and all Europeans lost the Second World War with Germany.
Log in to reply
4
0
Hide replies
Reparations. Get Your Reparations!
2 days ago
If only we could show the people of the past what their sacrifices would bring about in the future… WW2 would not even have happened.
Log in to reply
1
0
CynanMacNial
4 days ago
Absolutely fantastic work Mark. I was utterly mortified when i saw the headline that Sven had been found guilty. Most of our people would glance at it and think; fair enough hes obviously a Nazi. Oblivious to the fact its one of our own being thrown to the wolves and our freedom, rights and nationhood are being further eroded. James is a hero of our folk and should be given Laurels. Many thanks and God bless!
Log in to reply
4
0

@cheflad
4 days ago
the Judiciary is totally infiltrated.
Log in to reply
3
0

@Deanfranjek
1 day ago
Time to rise up. Globalists must die
Log in to reply
2
0

@John_Connor
22 hours ago
Anyone got a link to the “banned” podcasts
Log in to reply
1
0

@MilosM.
21 minutes ago
strange trial, that is. the system is officially against native people and it’s shame and disgrace. Justice is put to sleep. I am afraid this won’t end well. I won’t advocate for harsher means, but I am afraid they will be necessary once.
Oh and I won’t defend pedo collectors of ghast material, but imo those who make such images of children in hurt are way worse than people who keep them on their phone.
Log in to reply

@MalteHenryk
1 day ago
A completely biased court that doesn’t even give the legal team of the accused enough time for proper preparations.
Nuremberg comes to mind.
Log in to reply
Awake since 1997
3 days ago
Ultra toxic brainwashed victim talking about the brainwashed lol….
https://t.me/endilluminati/22921
Log in to reply

@James_Smith
4 days ago
Thanks for the explanation Mark – A disgusting situation.
Log in to reply
MTaylor
4 days ago

==========================

See Also

top

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT

============================================

PDF Download

top

• Total words in post = 4,312
• Total words in transcript = 2,505
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB): (Available later)

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Wed, Apr 12, 2023 — Published post. Includes Odysee comments (40).

Sven Longshanks

The Daily Nationalist

UK Government Grooming Gang Initiative

Mon, Apr 3, 2023

[Sven Longshanks, a long standing British White nationalist, strong supporter of Patriotic Alternative, and the man behind the Radio Albion website gives a brief update on his ongoing persecution by the legal system under its Orwellian hate speech laws.

Successive traitorous (((British governments))) have been, and continue to be, involved in a genocidal agenda to replace the White British through “legal” (and illegal) mass migration of non-Whites, against the overwhelming objection of its White population.

Sven has been found guilty of (((hate speech))) for ten podcasts produced several years ago where he spoke against White genocide, and now awaits likely a sentence of years in prison.

All nationalists should give their support to Sven against this creeping tyranny, in any way, big or small.

– KATANA]

https://www.radioalbion.com/2023/04/the-daily-nationalist-uk-government.html

Published on Mon, Apr 3, 2023

Description

The Daily Nationalist: UK Government Grooming Gang Initiative – DN 040323
SL12:00
Sven Longshanks gives some brief thoughts on his recent trial and comments on Rishi Sunak’s new grooming gangs initiative.
After pressure from the alt-media and GB News, the UK Government have finally announced a raft of measures to deal with this national scandal.
Police will now record the ethnicity of the perpetrators and a new ‘aggravating’ factor will be added to sentences, similar to the one used in racial hate crimes.
A new taskforce of experts will help local police do the investigations, while the National Crime Agency will be overseeing them to make sure political correctness does not hamper proceedings.
It will also be mandatory for those responsible for children to report any fears of child sexual abuse occurring, which means fear of being called racist will no longer be accepted as an excuse for dereliction of duty.
Presented by Sven Longshanks
The Daily Nationalist: UK Government Grooming Gang Initiative – DN 040323
Download
The Daily Nationalist will be back on Radio Albion tomorrow at 12pm EDT/5pm BST.
See the daily radio schedule for more ethnocentric audio to download
Join the chatroom and follow the feed
Subscribe to Radio Albion on Telegram HERE
Add this http://audio.radioalbion.com:8777/; to your DAB player to listen to Radio Albion
Click for new Shoutcast player
We can accept donations sent to this NEW bitcoin wallet identifier:
bc1qvdwdj6gfruxrt9fre3vhpx650rmwa2p7hu0mg0
We can also accept Etherium to this wallet:
0xDfD578999B6FBc1F9e31574a48096209166F7589

_____________

TRANSCRIPT QUALITY = 4 Stars

1 Star — Poor quality with many errors, contains nonsense text 2 Stars — Low quality with many errors, some nonsense text. 3 Stars — Medium quality with some errors. 4 Stars — Good quality with only a few errors. 5 Stars — High quality with few to no errors.

NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(33:55 mins)

You’re listening to Radio Albion, talk radio for the Nationalist community.

Hello and welcome to the Daily Nationalist. Today’s date is Monday the 3rd April 2023 and you’re listening to me, Sven Longshanks, streaming at radioalbion.com.

Well, I’ll just say a few brief things about the trial. I don’t want to talk too much about it at the moment. I am very pleased that I was actually able to beat King’s own counsel on five counts, but obviously not happy about being found guilty on ten counts. And these charges related to language that I had used half a decade ago, and I would be the first to admit that I was using impolite or vulgar language back then. And the jury found me guilty of inciting hatred with that language.

And I think that was the reason why the judge had some harsh words for me at the end of the trial, which I know a lot of people have been upset about. But I think he did that for the journalists, because the journalists couldn’t, obviously couldn’t use the language that I had been using because the jury found it to be hate speech. And because the jury had found me guilty of incitement to hate, then the judge was duty bound to comment upon it.

And obviously because the journalist couldn’t use that same language, he gave them something that they could use to try and convey just how terrible the language was.

Now, what I’ve done, because this was language, as I say, it was used over half a decade ago, I was arrested in 2019 and it came out in court. There was one charge from 2019, and the detective in court said that they had been monitoring Radio Albion up until 2021 and they stopped monitoring it in 2021 because it became apparent that there was no more offending.

So in light of this and the decision that the language that I was using up to 2019 counts as incitement to hate, I’ve removed the social commentary on the website up to the end of 2019. So I’ve removed the Daily Nationalist, the Daily Traditionalist, Aryan Britannia. I’ve removed all of those.

So hopefully everything that is on the website now is within the law. And obviously we looked at these things in 2019, and, 20020 and came up with a formula for talking about these subjects and doing it in an objective way and doing it in a way that stays within the law.

There’s been no requirement that the website be taken down or anything like that. And to ensure that that doesn’t happen, obviously I’ve taken steps to make certain that there is nothing on there that could be considered to be incitement to hate.

So that’s all I really want to talk about as far as the trial goes for now. They’re waiting for a pre-sentencing report and sentencing should take place on the 28th April. So until that time I will continue as normal.

[04:09]

And there’s a bit of good news that I want to get into today, and it’s something that we’ve been calling for here at Radio Albion ever since this scandal first appeared in the news about the grooming gangs:

“Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has announced a new set of plans to stamp out sex grooming gangs who have targeted young women and girls in a major victory for a GB News investigates campaign.”

Now this is good. GB News, mainstream media source, and they obviously highlighted this, but this is highlighting it four or five years after the alternative media were also highlighting it.

So this just shows that if you put pressure on the government from the media, you can get them to institute policies that we want to see:

“In a landmark new policy for tackling the national scandal, Downing Street announced the formation of a new grooming gangs task force which would involve specialist officers being parachuted in to assist police forces with live child sexual exploitation and grooming investigations to bring more of these despicable criminals to justice.”

That’s an absolute quote there, calling them “despicable criminals”:

“The new force will be led by the police and supported by the national crime agency, the NCA.”

So let’s hope that this grooming gang’s task force are good at doing their job. It seems that they think they will be:

“The NCA has seen significant success in dealing with historic group based child sexual exploitation cases in Rotherham where it was brought in to deal with the town’s scandal after local police and council failures were exposed in a series of government reports.”

And of course we will remember all of those. I think they took place in 2014 and the main reason why these crimes were not investigated is because people had a fear of being called “racist”. And we still have that fear today. People are still very careful and they talk about certain subjects because they’re concerned that if they don’t talk about them in a certain way, they could put themselves at risk of accusation of racism, or accusation of incitement to hate:

“GB News understands that the NCA will act as oversight for local police forces with specialist officers being sent into specific areas if issues are raised about a hesitancy to tackle grooming gangs.”

And who is it that’s going to raise this issue about a hesitancy? Is there going to be a hotline set up? And if victims feel the police are failing to investigate their allegations, will they be able to call up, or will this be something that the police force themselves are expected to do? Sort of when the police announce that they’re going to be investigating themselves. It doesn’t make it clear here whether it will be a member of the public that can call for this to be investigation, call for this to be investigated, sorry, or whether it be the police themselves:

“The 2014 Jay Report found that some 1400 girls had been groomed, abused, raped and tortured in Rotherham between 1997 and, 2013, with the police and council failing to act due to fears that tackling the problem would look racist.”

And a lot of people forget that there was torture involved here. There was horrific things that were done to these girls:

“Since launching it’s own investigation in the town in 2014, the NCA has revised the number of victims to 1, 510, identified hundreds of suspects, and secured several high profile prosecutions and convictions.”

So it seems like the NCA and their specialists have had some success in doing this. And when you look at the numbers here, they’re talking about these 1400 girls, and that went up to 1500. And around about this time, Sarah Champion, the former Labour MP, I think she was Labour MP for this area, said that there could have been up to a million young girls that have been victims of these grooming gangs. And you can use a search engine for that and you can still find the article today. It was produced in the Mirror suggesting that up to a million girls could have actually been victims. And at the time, it was shocking enough that they said that 1400 girls have been groomed, abused, and raped. But you think a million, a million victims!

And of course, there is child abuse within the White community. And where the White community are the majority in this country, you could say, well, the majority of abuse is carried out by people who are White.

But if you look at the figures for the grooming gangs that were carried, actual grooming gangs, that is a gang of people involved in this, not an individual child abuser. And you will find that these grooming gangs are majority Asian. And then if you look at the percentage of the population that is actually Asian, you will see that they’re actually far more likely to be involved in this child abuse activity than somebody who is White.

I mean, the government famously brought a report out last year, I think it was, and they said:

“Oh, White people are more likely to be involved in grooming gangs!”

And they fudged the issue, basically, because White people are 85% of the population, so of course they’re going to be in the majority.

But if you look at the percentage of the population that are Asian, and then look at the number of grooming gangs, you’ll see that Asians are more likely, as a group, they’re more likely to be involved in this.

And of course, that’s not to say all Asians are groomers. It’s only a minority, but they are a group that is more likely to be involved in it! And part of these recommendations has actually addressed that issue, which I’m very pleased about. We’ll get to that in a bit:

“The government’s announcement comes less than two months after GB News broadcasted ‘Grooming Gangs: Britain’s Shame’, the Channel’s first documentary under the GB News Investigates brand. The documentary called for a new NCA task force to assist local police investigations into group localized child sexual abuse and exploitation.”

And the solutions that we were talking about a few years back when we were covering this issue, we were saying this could not have taken place if it wasn’t for multiculturalism! That is the root of the problem! No multiculturalism, no potential victims, no potential Asian grooming gangs either, because you don’t have the multiculturalism.

[11:16]

So of course people say:

“Well, how can we change that? We have multiculturalism.”

But you have to remember the ideal is to have homogeneous communities which everybody is always best off amongst their own family and amongst their own extended family. They’re always safest amongst their own extended family. We have to remember that ideal, even if we do have multiculturalism. And we have to hold the government to account for this because they are the ones that changed the demographics of the country. They are the ones that:

“Sent out search parties around the world.”

I think was the comment used by the Labor MP, the Labour government rather, under Tony Blair. They sent out search parties around the world looking for as many immigrants as they could find to import into the country, to quote:

“Rub the Right’s nose in diversity!”

Close quote. So we have to hold the government to account for setting up the conditions where this sort of abuse could take place:

“The documentary called for the task force to hold the police to account after decades of scandals, whether it is for failing to collect data on ethnicity or for not prosecuting criminals.”

And this is the important point. The government are now going to collect data on ethnicity because the majority of the victims are White and the majority of the perpetrators where it’s grooming gang activity are Asians.

So this is a factor. And if they’re not collecting the data on ethnicity, then they can’t find out this information.

And of course there is this fear of accusations of “racism” and that’s why they weren’t actually collecting the details on ethnicity. And what that effectively means is you could have a group in society that has a higher percentage of criminal types within that group for a particular type of criminal activity and they could be carrying out their crimes.

And because the government is not collecting the details on ethnicity, it would just pass them by and the government wouldn’t realize that one of these groups was responsible for this activity.

Once you can find out which group is most likely to be carrying out this activity, then you can target your resources to preventing that group from carrying out this activity.

So I think there’s two parts to this. They’re going to record the data on ethnicity so they can see who it is is most likely, or what group is most likely to be carrying out this activity.

And then the second part of this policy is going to be putting in these experts working alongside the police that understand these communities, I should imagine:

“Downing Street said the NCA supported task force will include data analysts to identify the types of criminals who carry out these offences, helping police forces across the country catch offenders who might otherwise be missed.”

And of course, it’s rather a generalization to say, well, it’s Asian grooming gangs, but there may be a particular positions in society within the Asian community that are more likely to be a part of these grooming gangs. I mean, it might be minicab drivers, for instance, might be kebab shop owners, might be restaurant owners, things like that.

So if they collect this data and they can see that that is a likely profession for these people to have, then that means they can target their resources on those areas, they can target the resources on the minicab drivers, they can be more strict on giving out the licences. They can investigate the people that they give the licences out to. They can give them a heightened investigation before giving them the licence. And this is a sensible thing to do.

Of course, the government is now being accused of profiling and racism and all the rest of it. And you have to give Suella Braverman, you have to give her some credit here because she is saying:

“Well, what’s more important, not being politically correct or saving these victims from happening in the first place or pursuing these criminals, preventing these crimes from happening?”

Surely preventing horrific crimes like this from happening is more important than the risk of being accused of racial profiling, or being a racist, or not being politically correct:

“In a statement, the government added that the task force will also include police recorded ethnicity data to make sure suspects cannot evade justice because of cultural sensitivities, which is another demand made in the GB News Investigates documentary.”

And of course, that’s something the alternative media have been talking about for a long time, that the ethnicity needed to be recorded. Because people who were pointing this out, who are saying:

“Well, this goes on within this community.”

They were told that they were:

“Racists, they were making it all up, and this community would never do such a thing!”

And if the police had actually been recording the ethnicity, they would have had the data there and it would have shown them that they were more likely to carry out this activity. And they’re saying here that people have been evading justice because of cultural sensitivities.

And I guess again, what they mean there is because people are sensitive about talking about these other cultures. And again, just the fact that people have evaded justice because of cultural sensitivities, that’s the government admitting multiculturalism has led to people evading justice. I mean, surely that’s what they mean by “cultural sensitivities”, they mean a different culture. So multiculturalism is to blame. It added:

“This will include better data on the makeup of grooming gangs, including ethnicity, to make sure suspects cannot hide behind cultural sensitivities as a way to evade justice. Elizabeth, a survivor of child sexual exploitation from Rotherham, told GB News ‘I truly hope this is the moment we have all been waiting for as survivors and campaigners. The national grooming gang scandal has dragged on for decades without major action, but these plans show huge potential’.”

So that’s good. One of the survivors here, one of the former victims, she’s had a look at this plan and she thinks it’s positive:

“The NCA secured the conviction of my abuser in 2018 and I hope the government’s new task force will help secure justice for other victims across the country, and not just in Rotherham. Elizabeth not her real name added the Home Secretary is right to speak frankly about the background of the perpetrators. Political correctness and fears of being called racist silenced so many people and prevented investigations when myself and thousands of other survivors needed it.”

[18:03]

Remember, this was going on for decades and it wasn’t investigated because they wanted to promote “community cohesion”, which effectively meant that they wanted to cover up these crimes because they were concerned that the so-called far-Right would be able to capitalise upon it.

And of course when you look at that they’re effectively saying:

“Well, they would rather have victims and girls being raped than have the chance of the far-Right being able to say, ‘Well look here, multiculturalism isn’t working! We never would have had all these victims here if it wasn’t for multiculturalism!’.”

And of course you get the accusation then, well:

“How would you deal with the problem of multiculturalism?”

And of course Patriotic Alternative have got a policy there: Voluntary repatriation. Then of course people will say:

“Well, what about people who don’t want to leave?”

Well they wouldn’t have to leave, would they? I should imagine that the sort of people that wouldn’t want to leave for voluntary repatriation would be the sort of people that have high paid jobs because they would be turning down a financial reward for voluntary repatriation.

And the ones with the high paying jobs are not really the ones that are causing the problems within society, are they? I don’t think there are many judges or doctors so far that have been convicted of being involved in these grooming gangs. So there is a way that we can limit the multiculturalism without harming anyone.

And in doing it in that way with voluntary repatriation, you’d actually be helping a lot of people as well because they’d be able to go back to their ancestral homeland with a large amount of money so that they could then set up a business there and they could help their people, they could be among their people.

And obviously it’s more conducive for happy living and a contented life to be living among people that are just like yourself, than it is to be living in a multicultural territory where it’s difficult to find people that think the same way as you and even speak the same language as you in some parts of the country.

Elizabeth said:

“I was sickened to see people calling the Home Secretary racist on Twitter after she correctly outlined the issue. Will these people never learn? Are our stories and all the data not enough?”

Well, it seems it isn’t enough for some people. You do get people on the extreme Left that just cannot see the wood for the trees. And you do get people on the Left that say things like:

“Well, these victims should just shut up for diversity’s sake! So we’ll just hide these crimes under the carpet and hope that nobody notices.”

Well, that’s gone on for long enough. And now it seems something will be done about this. There will be this special task force and the police will be recording the ethnicity so that we do actually have the data to point to:

“Maggie Oliver, the Greater Manchester Police whistleblower who exposed a rape gangs scandal in Rochdale, told GB News ‘I welcome the attention being focused today on this national shame, and I am cautiously optimistic about these plans. But my fear is this is more rhetoric, which I’ve heard many times over the past ten years’.”

And I think that’s what most people are worried about, that this won’t actually amount to something. But it seems one of these victims or one of these survivors has looked at this and thinks that, yeah, these are pretty good ideas. This former police lady, Maggie Oliver, she is concerned that it’s just going to be more rhetoric.

And of course, the answer to that is, we need to hold the politician’s feet to the fire, don’t we? The media, mainstream media, and the alternative media, need to make sure that the government carry through on this. And need to make sure that these figures and the details of this and the results of this, that they are made public. I think that’s the important thing, so that we can actually see the data for ourselves. She added:

“I heard similar promises made by former Home Secretaries Priti Patel and Sajid Javid, but sadly, action never followed the words. I hope this time it is different. But only time will tell. And until the monumental changes needed are actually put into place, victims of these horrific crimes will continue to have their lives destroyed!”

Well, I have to say, I think Suella Braverman, so far, she’s certainly doing a better job of being Home Secretary than Priti Patel and Sajid Javid, certainly doing a better job than Amber Rudd!

And at least she doesn’t seem too frightened to talk about these issues for political correctness reasons. And it is under Suella Braverman that this initiative is being started, so I can’t really criticize Ms Braverman. Mrs Braverman:

“The Maggie Oliver Foundation exclusively shared details of its annual report with GB News in February as part of the broadcaster’s year long investigations into the grooming gangs scandal. The charity said that it was currently working on over 50 live group localised child sexual exploitation cases.”

So on 50 different grooming gangs, basically, they’re looking at at the moment:

“Charity also confirmed that it had supported more than 1000 survivors of child sexual abuse and exploitation through its legal advocacy and emotional support services since 2020.”

It’s probably only about one in 100 of these victims that actually end up going to the police. I should imagine there’s 100 times that number there, especially if Sarah Champion was right when she said the number of people that were calling her up. She made this estimate that there could have been up to a million survivors in Britain.

And of course, that’s including all the years that this has been going on for. This charity here that’s been supporting 1000 survivors. I mean, that’s just the survivors this year, isn’t it? That’s not including the ones from 10, 20, 30 years ago:

“Last year alone, some 400 survivors contacted the foundation, having been failed by the police in some way. Ahead of the launch of the new task force the Prime Minister said the safety of women and girls is paramount. For too long, political correctness has stopped us from weeding out vile criminals who prey on children and young women. We will stop at nothing to stamp out these dangerous gangs!”

Well, he talks a good talk, doesn’t he? But does he walk the walk? That’s the issue. He says they will stop at nothing to stamp out these dangerous gangs. So we’ll have to look next year and see whether these victims are saying that they’re still being failed by the police and whether these gangs are still out there.

[24:51]

I mean, I do wonder if Tommy Robinson’s recent documentaries, maybe they have helped with this as well? It’s not just GB News that have been highlighting this. Tommy Robinson, for all his faults, has put out some excellent documentaries on this issue this year. I forget what they’re called. I think you can find them on Rumble:

“The government is also expected to introduce new legislation that will make being the leader of or involved in a grooming gang a statutory aggravating factor during sentencing. Which will secure longer prison sentences for perpetrators convicted of these offences.”

And of course, this is something we’ve been talking about at Radio Albion, and we were talking about this years ago, that these grooming gangs, it should be the equivalent of a hate crime. Because they are particularly going after White victims. And that is effectively what it means here. Because if there is a “hate” aspect to a crime, then that is a statutory aggravating factor.

So they are saying that being a leader of or being involved in one of these gangs, that will be a statutory aggravating factor. So we’ll have to see whether they consider it an aggravating factor. The equivalent to the aggravating factor, that would be if it was based on race or minority status:

“When Elizabeth’s abuser was convicted of two rapes in 2018, he was sentenced to just nine years. Being released after four and a half years, including two years spent in the comfort of an open prison. Elizabeth told GB News longer prison sentences are vital for us survivors. All too often, the rapists are back in their communities in no time. We see them in the street, we see them in the supermarket. It’s got to stop!”

And I remember there was I think there was two or three of these groomers that were put in prison and the Home Secretary said that they would be deported when they came out. And they came out and they weren’t deported. And the poor victim bumped into one of them in the supermarket:

“This new legislation is another campaigning victory for GB News Investigates in Grooming Gangs: Britain’s Shame. The broadcaster urged the government to act. We need stronger prison sentences for the rapists. No victims should see their abuser walk out of prison after only a few years.”

And, of course, again, Tommy Robinson has been talking about this. We were talking about this in Radio Albion. GB News is just the latest one, but GB News are a mainstream media organisation:

“The new developments come after Home Secretary Suella Braverman announced that the government would introduce a mandatory reporting for adults working with children if they suspect or identify that a child is being abused, which was a major recommendation from the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse.”

And this is good, because I should imagine it was also teachers that were being politically correct and didn’t want to report what was going on with the children in their care because they were frightened of being accused of being a racist as well.

So this will make it mandatory that anybody that finds out anything about this, if they’re responsible for children, they have to tell the authorities:

“Writing in the Mail on Sunday, Braverman said the inquiry found repeated individual and institutional failures to report child sexual abuse. It recommended that the government should introduce a mandatory duty for professionals with safeguarding responsibilities to report any signs or suspicions of such abuse. Had this duty been in place already, countless children would have been better protected against grooming gangs and against sexual abusers more widely.”

So it must have been that the people responsible for these children, they didn’t report it because they were frightened of what they would be called. They would be called nasty names, they would be called racist, wouldn’t they? Or Islamophobic, if they had reported this:

“The Home Secretary has also announced that the government will provide £600,000 in funding to the NSPCC Whistleblowing Helpline. So they have a specific grooming gang helpline that’s part of the National Association or the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelties to Children. If a professional has concerns that their organisation is not reporting or handling child abuse cases appropriately, they can contact the NSPCC Whistleblowing Helpline for support.”

So perhaps it’s this helpline that is linked up with the NAC that we were talking about at the beginning of this article, that they would then cause them to go in and investigate, and send in specialist experts to actually help the police force:

“The helpline was launched in 2016 following Professor Alexis Jay’s report into the Rotherham catastrophe and has led to over 300 referrals to the police since then.”

[29:39]

So that’s 300 referrals for child caring organisations who have not been caring properly for the children. They’ve been allowing this to go on.

So this is people that have then reported. I guess, children’s homes and things like that, where they’re supposed to be responsible for caring for these children. And in actual fact, they’ve been hiding the fact that these children are actually being abused by these grooming gangs:

“Commenting on the latest wave of legislation planned for tackling child abuse in general and grooming gangs in particular, the Home Secretary said ‘child sexual abuse is one of the most horrific crimes facing our society. It devastates victims families and whole communities. The protection of children is a collective effort. Every adult must be supported to call out child sexual abuse without fear’.”

She doesn’t say it there, but it’s without fear of being called racist or Islamophobic. That is the fear that people have when this abuse is being carried out by members of the Muslim community:

“The despicable abusers must be brought to justice. They should not be able to hide and they must face the full force of the law for their crimes. That is why I am introducing a mandatory reporting duty and launching a call for evidence. We must address the failures identified by the inquiry and take on board the views of the thousands of victims and survivors who contributed to its findings. I would encourage everyone to engage with the process once it starts. It is important to have a national conversation about this, to shine a light on this terrible but too often hidden crime.”

Very important we have a national conversation about this, she says there. But the fear is, of course, once you start talking about these things, you can be accused of racism and Islamophobia. I hope we do have a national conversation about this. I hope it isn’t just GB News that talks about this and the alternative media. We do need to keep this subject in the spotlight because it is still going on, it hasn’t got any better and it’s very good that the government are now paying attention to this. It’s very good that Suella Braverman is highlighting this. And it’s good that she has called for a national conversation about it.

And I’d like, hopefully we might see her step in there if people are having a conversation about this and they get accused of hate speech, because I’ve seen that happen a couple of times now. I’ve seen Suella Braverman step in and announce on Twitter that she does not agree with what the police are doing, for instance, with regards to allegations of hate speech. I can’t recall the exact incidents now, but there have been two or three of them.

I think she also stepped in there, didn’t she, to appeal the judgement on the people that pulled down the Edward Coulson statue, saying that that wasn’t a crime, when it quite clearly was a crime. It was thanks to Suella Braverman that she got that appeal heard and they said that that was a perverse judgement.

So this is good news all in all, and we’ll have to keep watching it to see whether they carry through on their words.

Well, thank you very much for listening. I’ll be back tomorrow with more of the Daily Nationalist for you. God bless and hail victory.

[33:13]

[Outro Music]

You’re listening to Radio Albion talk radio for the nationalist community.

[33:55]

END

top

============================================

Comments

top

==========================

See Also

top

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT

============================================

PDF Download

top

• Total words in post = xxx
• Total words in transcript = xxx
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB): (Available later)

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Wed, Apr 5, 2023 — Published post.