BitChute – katana17

Mark Collett – Is the Covid Jab Causing Heart Attacks? – Oct 8, 2021 — Transcript

admin — Sat, 09 Oct 2021 08:01:18 +0000

[Mark Collett, leader of the pro-White British movement, Patriotic Alternative, discusses some of the possible adverse effects of the Covid-19 vaccine.

— KATANA]

Mark Collett

Is the Covid Jab

Causing Heart Attacks?

Oct 8, 2021

Click here for the video:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/BriMYxHKpxiO/

Published on Oct 8, 2021

Bitchute Description

MarkCollett

IS THE COVID JAB CAUSING HEART ATTACKS?

First published at 12:00 UTC on October 8th, 2021.

channel image

Mark Collett

MarkCollett

21550 subscribers

The Covid Jabs have already been linked to myocarditis, but are they behind a worrying rise in heart attacks? This video explains how the immune system works, what a traditional vaccine is, and why the Covid jabs are NOT vaccines and how in fact the…

Category News & Politics

Sensitivity Normal – Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over

Ways you can help contribute to my work:

BitCoin: bc1qzgjz953f4gznway0hvz6lx360yd2autdkwf6nu

Etherium: 0xb44739a8f2c57Cad38F96Aab8F2a0cA18258A7bA

BitCoin Cash: qpaaukrttfvq0j99gfl43hhs5q0tmhzfevkhp3r2c9

Monero: 42qypZQGMzNfFa5yXBxkqxL4iDw5cmzbtCC81dKcQbMrhLrsJUYAFSsLs9Um4hG32R5GfaqfgGj7oR6ZJ7pGyaY3FFu9HKD

You can also donate to my work via Entropy:

https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

My book, The Fall of Western Man is now available. It is available as a FREE eBook and also in hardback and paperback editions.

The Official Website:

http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

FREE eBook download:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3cctZ95PDYZTnRjSUd5VUtRR2c/view

Hardback Edition:

https://www.lulu.com/shop/mark-collett/the-fall-of-western-man/hardcover/product-23388841.html

Paperback Edition:

http://amzn.eu/9LaS7HN

PLEASE NOTE: If you wish to debate with me in the comments about anything I have said, I welcome that. However please listen to the complete podcast and ensure you argue with the points I have made. Arguments that simply consist of nonsense such as “what gives you the right to judge” or “I’m a [insert religious affiliation] and you should be ashamed of yourself” or other such vacuous non-arguments will simply be ridiculed.

_____________

NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(14:00 mins)

[00:00]

A recent article in The Times stated, and I quote:

“Health experts have been left baffled by a big rise in a common and potentially fatal type of heart attack in the west of Scotland. During the summer there was a 25% rise in the number of people rushed to the Golden Jubilee National Hospital in Clydebank with partially blocked arteries cutting blood supply to the heart”.

End quote. Health experts may indeed be baffled, or they may well be ignoring the elephant in the room. That this mysterious rise in heart attacks may well be linked to the Covid vaccination drive.

We already know that the Covid jab is linked to an increase in myocarditis. An inflammation of the heart muscle that can lead to heart attacks. But could this increase in heart attacks also be linked to the Covid jab?

Well, to answer this question it’s good to start by ensuring we understand what our immune system does, what a traditional vaccine is, and why the Covid jab is different to a traditional vaccine.

Your immune system is a wonderful thing! It is one of the ways the body protects itself from disease. Your immune system learns and adapts and creates a targeted response to viruses and bacteria that enter the body. When a harmful virus, or bacteria, enters the body the virus, or bacteria, will do two things. Multiply and cause damage. The more time that the virus, or bacteria has to operate without a response, the greater it’s numbers will become and the greater the damage it will create due to the cumulative effects over time.

But also, because over time it will have multiplied and a larger number of pathogens have the ability to create far greater damage. As such, the immune system attempts to deal with any bacteria, or virus as quickly and efficiently as possible.

However, every bacteria and virus is different. This presents a problem for the immune system, because when the immune system creates a response in order to kill a particular bacteria, or virus, that response is specific to the particular bacteria, or virus, in question. An immune response that deals with one bacteria, or virus, does not work against any other bacteria, or virus.

If you think of the immune system as an army, and a bacteria, or virus, as the invading enemy, then every time that the army engages with a new enemy it needs a new type of bullet. And that bullet only works against that specific enemy.

So what happens when your body encounters a new type of virus, or bacteria?

Well, your immune system attempts to act as quickly as possible by firstly analyzing the new threat and then producing the specific bullet needed to deal with that threat. This is a race against time, as your body tries to develop and deploy it’s response before the bacteria, or virus, can multiply and cause damage that may, if too much time elapses, be serious, or even fatal.

Once the body has developed the bullet to deal with a specific bacteria, or virus, the blueprint for that bullet goes into the immune system’s memory bank.

Then, if the body ever encounters said bacteria, or virus, again a response can be immediately deployed. This is why you never get ill twice from exactly the same type of bacteria, or virus. Because if a bacteria, or virus, invades your body a second time, your body’s immune system recognizes it, selects the right bullet to deal with it and destroys the bacteria, or virus, long before it has time to multiply and become a problem.

Bearing this in mind people often ask why they catch a cold multiple times, or why they will experience flu more than once in their lifetime.

This is because cold and flu viruses are part of a family of pathogens that evolve fairly rapidly. Hence, there are many different individual cold and flu viruses. Even though you won’t get exactly the same cold, or flu twice you will inevitably suffer from more than one infection from a virus that is a member of those particular families of viruses.

So, what is a traditional vaccine, and why do we vaccinate? Certain bacteria and viruses are more harmful than others. Whilst a cold is a mere inconvenience that will leave you feeling slightly under the weather for a couple of days, typhoid will likely leave you disabled, or even kill you!

Sometimes a bacteria, or a virus can do serious damage before your body manages to create the specific bullet needed to destroy the threat. And in the time your body takes developing that bullet, the damage caused by the bacteria, or virus, may even be fatal. These more serious threats are often negated with what we know as a vaccine.

[05:01]

A vaccine is essentially an inert, or harmless form of a bacteria, or virus. Vaccines can be made in two ways. Firstly, they contain either a live form of a bacteria, or virus that has been weakened. And because of that the virus, or bacteria, can’t multiply, or is unable to cause the damage it would normally cause.

Secondly, a vaccine can be produced that contains a virus, or bacteria, that is completely inactive and essentially dead. When these vaccines are injected into the body, the body’s immune system then has a chance to analyze the weakened bacteria, or virus, safely without said threat being able to multiply, or cause any damage.

This means the body can produce the specific bullets necessary. So if a fully active version of that virus, or bacteria, gets into the body the body is ready and can act swiftly before any damage is caused.

So what are the mRNA Covid vaccines produced by companies like Pfizer? Well, they are not vaccines!

They do not involve injecting an inert form of a virus into the human body. They, in fact, do something completely different. They cause the human body to produce a protein which is meant to be sufficiently similar to a protein that is found in the capsid that surrounds the Covid-19 virus.

However, there is a big problem with this. Your immune system is being taught to attack a protein that your own body has produced. And if that protein is similar to other proteins within your body, this could result in what is known as an autoimmune response.

Which is a situation where your immune system mistakenly attacks your own cells. As the fundamental building block of your body’s tissues are, in fact, proteins, if your immune system was to attack. One of those proteins in error the results could be serious, or even fatal.

And so far in the UK there have been well over a million adverse reactions to the Covid jab including over 1400 deaths.

This statistic is taken directly from the NHS’s own Yellow Card Reporting site. What’s more these figures are only for the adverse reactions that were reported and logged. Some reactions will not have been reported. And there has been widespread anecdotal evidence to suggest that some doctors have been reluctant to log these adverse reactions.

As such it’s highly likely that this number greatly underestimates the number of adverse reactions caused by the various Covid jabs. These adverse reactions include headaches, blurred vision, swelling, tinnitus, heart problems, and strokes.

These reactions are often caused by blood clots forming in the body. Blood clots can form as part of an immune response. And in this case an autoimmune response. What causes these adverse reactions from the Covid jab is that the body’s immune system is mistakenly attacking proteins in the body’s own cells, causing damage to the body. If the cells being attacked are blood cells, then clotting takes place.

If these clots are either large enough in size, or number, they can be life-threatening, or even fatal. The rising heart problems we are seeing in parts of Britain may well be linked to the rapid deployment of Covid jabs. The jabs in question are largely untested and were rushed to market. These jabs were not subject to what is known in the medical profession as “Good Manufacturing Practice”.

Good Manufacturing Practice, or GMP is a system for ensuring that products are consistently produced and controlled according to quality standards. GMP is designed to minimize the risks involved in any pharmaceutical production. And as these particular jabs were rushed to market, the long-term effects are still not properly known. What’s more the companies that produce them have been granted total immunity from any form of legal challenge if their product causes side effects, or even death.

This fact alone should set alarm bells ringing. But if it doesn’t let’s look at a historical case of a drug that was presented as safe and caused widespread suffering.

In the 1950s a West German pharmaceutical company developed a drug called Thalidomide. It was originally intended as a sedative, or tranquilizer, but was soon used for treating a wide range of other conditions, including, colds, flu, nausea, and morning sickness in pregnant women.

The drug was sold under a variety of different names in 49 countries, and was specifically recommended to pregnant women. Thalidomide has a number of side effects. One being severe birth defects with limbs and internal organs often failing to form.

Over 100,000 babies were affected by the drug. Yet it took until 1962 for the British government to issue a warning over it’s use. Similarly, it could be years, or even decades before we have all the data necessary to assess the safety of the Covid jabs.

But just remember, future data on the safety of these jabs will come from the public. We are the guinea pigs!

Now, it is worth noting that Thalidomide is a drug and the Covid jab is being marketed as a vaccine. But both of those treatments were meant to be subject to the same testing and set of standards.

But why would these big pharmaceutical companies push largely untested products upon the population? Well, the answer to that is quite simple. These so-called vaccines are products, and these companies are interested in profit.

Recently Project Veritas released a number of damning exposes, featuring secret recordings of researchers and scientists working at Pfizer. This footage is very Illuminating. And one of the Pfizer employees elaborates on this very point. Have a listen.:

“[Cris Croce] I mean, I still feel like I work for like an evil corporation, because it comes down to profits in the end. And I mean, I’m there to help people not to make millions and millions of dollars. So I mean, that’s the moral dilema.

[Journalist (female)] I would say billions and billions?

[Cris Croce] I’m trying to be (laughs) nice.

[Journalist] No, I hear you. I hear you, I do. I mean, I’ll still give you a hard time about it.

[Cris Croce] Basically, our organization is run on COVID money now.

[Journalist] How so?

[Cris Croce] By it netted, like over $15 billion last year.

[Male voiceover] Chris Croce is a senior associate scientist with Pfizer. He goes on to explain a test that is currently taking place at Pfizer. Not to determine the effectiveness, but to see if it is leading to heart attacks.

[Journalist] I’m glad you didn’t get any myocarditis. That’s a concern, right?

[Cris Croce] Yeah. More so for younger people.

>

[Journalist] Why?

[Cris Croce] That’s what we’re looking into right now.

[Journalist] Oh, cool.

[Cris Croce] So yeah, we’re doing, we just sent like 3,000 patients’ samples to get tested for … like elevated troponin levels (levels to detect heart attack) to see if it’s vaccine-based, or so …

[Journalist] What’s it look like?

[Cris Croce] I don’t know. But we just sent that over this past week – and the last batch will be sent over next week. All external testing. We’ll see, hopefully it’s good. I mean, if not then, my opinion, that might pull something from the market.”

I have left the link to that video in the description below. So you can watch the full presentation.

In closing, I repeat. At the time of writing there have been over one million adverse reactions to these jabs in the UK alone. And these are just the reactions that we know about, and have been logged. The true extent of the number and severity of these negative reactions is not yet fully known. Only time will tell exactly how safe these jabs are.

But the worrying rise in heart problems that we are witnessing, may well be far more than just a coincidence.

[14:00]

END

top

============================================

BITCHUTE COMMENTS

top

NewestOldestPopular

============================================

PDF Download

top

Transcript Total words = xxx
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Oct 9, 2021 — Published post.

Morgoth’s Review – The Morgcast 01 – Flying Solo – Mar 17, 2021 – Transcript

admin — Fri, 26 Mar 2021 01:25:24 +0000

[Morgoth discusses the murder of a White woman in London and how the event is being manipulated by the system to divide women from men; the ever tightening of free speech in Britain with new laws being introduced to even restrict what is said in private, as what is happening in Scotland; how he’s sick to death about being told what he can and can’t say about what’s happening.

— KATANA]

Morgoth’s Review

Morgcast 01

Flying Solo

Mar 17, 2021

Click here for the video:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/kGcjc3q9md45/

https://odysee.com/@MorgothReviews:5/morgcast1:f

Published on Mar 17, 2021

BitChute Description

Morgoth’s Review

First published at 15:39 UTC on March 17th, 2021.

Morgoth’s Review

11518 subscribers

https://www.subscribestar.com/morgoth…

https://www.patreon.com/Morgoth

https://ko-fi.com/K3K3RSEG

Thanks to Theberton for the intros and outros

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_0K…

TRANSCRIPT

(41:38 mins)

[00:00]

[Intro music and imagery by Theberton.]

[00:40]

All right. So hello there everybody. And welcome to my little podcast that I’ve decided to do. I wanted to do something different, and I wanted to use old tech in a way that it wasn’t just offloading basically videos that were too hot for YouTube. And then, basically using Odysee, or BitChute. I’ve really gotten Odysee in mind for this one. To do something like actually different and new.

And maybe it’ll work. Maybe it’ll not, I don’t know. And I decided that I was going to do like a little podcast. And it’s just me on this one, going through some news of the last week, or so, and see if I can tie it together with some threads.

Because the thing with the way YouTube is I think you can kind of avoid the censorship a bit if you do kind of high quality, optics friendly, videos. But you’re constantly policing yourself. And you’re constantly sort of paranoid about what you do and you’ve got to keep everything tight And I want to do something where I can kind of ramble on a bit. And, you know, I’ll be coughing maybe [chuckling] through the stream! And I’m just gonna kind of go for it.

I mean, I was watching Sargon on his new channel, The Lotus Eaters, as he does. And you can sense just how paranoid he is! And he does it with some young fella that he’s got on there. And he’s constantly having to police what he’s saying. So they’re not allowed to say like fuck, or shit! And obviously when it comes to the politically correct words and terminology, they’re in this constant battle about how can you say it, and how can you say it in this context, or that context.

And. I think one of the things I’ll probably touch on here is that I’m sick and tired of jumping through those hoops! And it gets to the point when in like say YouTube you may get a lot of views on YouTube just for being a normal blog. I’ve always been like amazed at how many people watch my stuff, and it’s great! But like it gets to the point where there’s not really much point if I can’t just speak my mind.

And I think that’s going to be like a running theme of like my little podcast here. And like I say this is very going to be very rough around the edges. I’m going to keep it as absolutely basic as possible. Maybe I can like I’ll have a look at the comments next time and see if anybody has any suggestions. But I wanted to do something which had a feel and look to it which was just a little bit different.

I’ve always thought the live stream format was quite tacky and it’s throw away. I mean, one of the reasons I like doing the video essays is there’s channels out there and you find yourself, like you caught on a loose end and you go back. And you have a favorite video. You have a video that sticks in your mind. And that’s kind of how I got into it with YouTube when I found me way. I ended up thinking about some great video I’d watch somewhere else. And I’d think I want like that kind of thing to happen on my channel as well.

So the first thing is when you just do endless live streams, you kind of water that down and nobody goes back and watches a live stream from three months ago. I think anyway it’s – and I see it on sort of the ones I’ve done on my channel – it’s more, or less, dead content a week after it’s done.

And this is also the case with like doing hot takes and like news stuff, which I do less, and less, these days. But this means that I’m actually doing fewer videos, because, by the time you get the video out there, the way the situation with like women in London at the minute, and what’s going on. Which, I’m going to touch on here. By the time you actually get the video out there, the news is gone.

And then you’re left with like you’ve got to make a decision whether you want stuff which is going to last, which is kind of where I’ve gone, with the odd kind of news item in there, or whether you’re gonna end up with having all of these dead news stories of your hot takes on the news of the day, kind of shitting up your channel.

So I’ve decided to sort of play that right down and mainly do longer format video essays, which I thought were probably safer on YouTube as well.

[05:26]

So what I wanted to do was to have a like a podcast style thing, where I could just sort of not worry too much about policing myself and kind of have a look and have a gander at some of the stuff going on.

And so the first one that I wanted to get into, … And it obviously means it’s not going to be as slick as like a ton of bullet points where you keep on track. I mean, I can just wander all over the place on this format. But we’ll see how it goes. Maybe it’ll bore people the tears, I don’t know. But I just thought instead of just being stuck doing the same same thing all the time. I think it’s good to like try something different.

And another thing is like when we started I was guilty of this as well, is that on say BitChute, because we had like a free speech – you see this a lot –, because you have like a free speech platform and you’re used to censorship. And this is also the same on Gab, and Telegram. And it was also the same on BitChute.

So some site has flagged themselves up as being free speech. And then what happens is that people go completely berserk! And it becomes like, I know people complain about it. But it does become like an optics nightmare! Where all of the videos are like borderline illegal. And I think that’s going to the extreme. And I don’t want to be that edgy.

I’m not going to like set up my own thing off YouTube just so I can be like as outrageous and as offensive and like borderline illegal. And all of this. But mainly just so that I can, … Because that’s kind of fake as well! That’s a bit affected and a bit put on.

Really, I just wanted to have somewhere where I can speak normally without being paranoid that YouTube are going to shut me down. And so this is what it’s all about. Who knows where it’ll go. Maybe I’ll get guests on in the future. But the point is that from time to time I want to sort of touch on some stories which didn’t actually become like big news stories, big YouTube videos, or anything like that. Because I can kind of get them all done in one podcast kind of format on this old tech platform where I don’t have to worry all the time about what I’m saying.

And so it actually ties in with the stories that are going on in Britain. And I mean, ever since the American election I’ve just mainly been focusing back home. I’ve got no idea what’s going on? In America. And there is actually things going on in Britain as well. I mean, on the run up to the election it seemed like almost nothing was happening in Britain at all. It was just like this political dead zone! And it kind of is.

So let’s, if you look at what’s happening with the women in London, you have this woman was murdered by a off-duty police officer. And then you’ve had these vigils and it led to that ginger girl being pinned down by the police. And then straight away it was like she’s this actress, it turns out.

And then all of a sudden there’s this new crusade, like a feminist crusade, against the police force in Britain. Which is surprising, because like it’s literally run by a lesbian, that Cressida Dick! It’s already the most politically correct police force you can possibly imagine.

And so like what you end up with is this thing where you think this feels astro turfed, and this feels gay! It feels fake! But like do I then, and it gets back to the sort of “news of the day” hamster wheel. And you think:

“Do I actually want to invest any time in this? Do I actually, do I really give a shit! Or do I really care?”

But in the case of the ginger girl, I actually thought she looked quite hot, and quite attractive when she was lying on the ground. So I thought:

“Well, what’s the story here, you know, let’s have a look what she looks like when she’s normal and all this.”

And that led me down down the rabbit hole as they say. The rabbit hole of like:

“All right. So what’s the next news story?”

And before you know it she’s even like got a Twitter account! [chuckling] And it’s like she’s now become like a activist! A professional victim! And it’s like you get that toolkit, and you’ve got like the police have been tough on you, you’ve got a Left-wing cause to champion, you go on Good Morning Britain. And then all you’re just missing is the Twitter account!:

“Love, get the Twitter account up and running. And then you’re in with the club!”

She’ll probably have a column at the Guardian soon, or she’ll go swanning around on in the TV studios. And it’ll be like telling the story of the “fateful day”.

[10:45]

I mean, that she was actually shouting her mouth off and behaving like a total bitch. But that all gets swept to the wayside. And so all of this adds up to this feeling of fakeness. And just feeling kind of surreal, where you’re being played for a sap. And you’ve just got to make the decision of whether, or not you’re like:

“You give a shit, or you should just ignore the whole thing.”

And more, and more, I find myself ignoring these things, … Except when it’s a sort of cute redhead.

But another thing about it which everybody has picked up on, or at least I did. I mean, so I posted some of these things on Telegram. And this is like another reason why I wanted to do this. Because I find myself writing longer, and longer posts on Telegram. And I think, well I can just actually use the platform and put it all together. And then one of the things that you’ll notice about this is that the way they’re kind of approaching it as “all men”. So the gist of this whole like gay op is like:

“Men treat women like shit!”

And it’s mainly, seems to me, almost entirely centered in London. And you get all of these middle class like women coming out and talking about like:

“Men are bastards!”

And there was like Marina Hyde in the Guardian, writing columns about how she was followed down the street by some man, who was just calling her a cunt.

Like, you can do that kind of dead brain centrist take. And you can say how women are playing the victims. But at the same time I kind of think, well I can imagine what it’s like in London for an attractive woman in her 30s, or whatever age really. But in this case it is like these middle class types. And I can actually have some sympathy for it. I can actually imagine what it’s like for a professional White woman. And they’ll be liberal, because they’re still in London.

And I can actually imagine what it would be like for them walking down the street at night. And I do actually think that they’re taking a lot of crap! I do think they’re being stalked! I do think there’s a lot of men touching them up, feeling their boobs, maybe touching their ass on the tube, making all of these lewd comments. I think that White women in London really are getting a lot of crap like that. And I think there’s an element to the energy of London which is releasing itself.

Now the problem, of course, is that the men they’re talking about probably won’t be White. They’ll probably be other ethnicities. And London, you know, it’s all kinds of shit! Not just black men, not just the Asians and the Muslim community. But you’ve got all of this stuff coming in, like Turks, and fucking Kurds and Kosovos. And all of this. It’s all there in London.

And yeah, I actually think these women are taking that shit. And then this is like this surge of energy that’s come out. But only, because it’s safe! Only because the man who’s killed the woman, he’s just like a White Englishman, or something. So now it gives them a pass. It gives them a pass to kind of come out and release this energy and say:

“Yeah, all men are bastards! We need more laws!”

Because beforehand I think within these kind of libtard circles in London, …. I mean, I’m as far, I’d never go to London. I’m very far removed from London, like psychologically, culturally, and geographically. But I can imagine in London that you get at the dinner parties and things, I can imagine that they all are like that. I think there’ll be this code of silence among women who they all know.

All of these English, these White women, in London, they’ll all know that they’re all getting shit. And they’ll also all know that mainly the people doing it are immigrant stock, you know, non-White men of all kinds.

[15:08]

But then the political correctness is going to kick in, and it means that they can’t actually sort of address that issue head on. Because it’s going to go down pretty bad at the dinner party. They’re going to be ostracized. They’re going to be called racist. And so you see that they have to lie to themselves! They have to cope and come up with all of this bullshit. And then eventually they can say:

“Well it’s just all men are the problem!”

And now they’ve had that tip off.

[15:38]

And then you notice the grooming gangs issue has been going on for years, and years in this country and none of these women give a shit, really. Because then there was no way around it. Then it was just the kind of the ethnic issues, it was just one racial group, one cultural group, whatever you want to call them, sort of abusing that of the other. And they would have to hit it head-on. There was no little rabbit holes that they could bolt down to escape the issue, to escape reality of what was going on.

But when you’ve got up like a prominent case of a White man killing a White woman it kind of gives them the green light to kick off on that, and to vent their frustrations.

Because, yeah I do think they’ve been taking a lot of crap and getting abused. I can imagine what it’s like, it must be terrifying if you’re a good looking White woman, you’re walking down London late at night, you’ve come from a restaurant, you know. And there’s a gang of black youth, or whatever. Yeah. [chuckling] But if somebody like me points that out I’m called “racist scum”! And they’re the women that do it!

And just generally though the way this whole thing has gone, it’s what I was thinking about how perfect it was. Just the picture of the redhead girl like being pinned down to the floor.

And it reminded me of that other picture where you had that big like muscular black fella at a Right-wing rally last year to protect the statues, or something. And you got this big black fella like lifting this scrawny little White bloke who was, of course, like framed as being a “racist”. And he lifts him through the crowd, like this big black savior!

And it turns out like they the black fella was like he ran his own security firm, or something, and the White fella was like an ex-policeman! And so all of a sudden you get feeling that it’s a fucking gay op! It’s like a pile of crap that you’re watching! It’s just some sort of play that they’re putting on the television.

And it’s the same with that woman like now with that Twitter account, going to be touring the TV studios as a victim of the police! And you get the impression, …

I mean, I was looking at the government’s “Nudge Unit”. They’ve got this whole website and where they kind of tell the government how to frame things. And I’ve done videos on this before, but mainly I’m not actually that impressed with the Nudge Unit. I think the PR firms are much better at doing this. But I think it’s the same thing at play.

And they’ve got this sort of chart. It was a very long article at the government’s website on the Nudge Unit. And they’ve got these tips on how to frame the discourse, and how to nudge the population in one way, or another. Like I got into with Piers Morgan on the sort of the “bait ball of the sardines”. And they’ve got things like it says:

“Messenger: We are heavily influenced by who communicates information.”

So in if you take up with the ginger girl you do have that interest, because she did look quite sexy. She did look like there was something drawn in that as well. So you can say:

“Well who is the messenger there?”

And it’s kind of her. And then on social media they pick it up, you know, especially Twitter. And so the “messenger” then becomes the mainstream media, which most people still go along with, unfortunately. At least it gives it that impression. They actually pick this up. It says another one here is:

“Norms: We are strongly influenced by what others do.”

So once the narrative gets underway and it begins to pick up momentum, it acts like a sort of snowball. Again like the “bait ball”. People gravitate towards this new narrative that you know, like gravity pulling them in. And so eventually you’ve got an actual fully blown movement there. It’s also got:

“Defaults: We go with the flow of preset options.”

So the sort of opinions you can have on this are kind of limited. I mean, if you’re on the Right wing, you’re gonna have to say:

“Well, you just don’t give a shit what the police are doing!”

Or I don’t know what they’ll do. I mean, somebody like Lawrence Fox, or the sort of centrist types who represent the Right wing anti-establishment position, which is always quite feeble and laughable. They’ll have some kind of useless argument against it. Or maybe on this occasion they just decide to check out. Because it does come down to the protest and being banned by the police.

[21:03]

And then you’ve got things like:

“Affect: Our emotional associations can powerfully shape our actions.”

Yeah, you see like a good look woman being pinned to the ground, you’re gonna notice it, you’re gonna kind of feel something:

“We seek to be consistent with our public promises and reciprocate acts.”

That’s “Commitment”.

And “Ego”. It says:

“We act in ways that make us feel better about ourselves.”

So here you go back you’re then been sucked into this movement, which is to put pressure on the government, and how men are bastards to women, the police are fascists. And you find that you can make yourself feel good! You are doing the right thing! You are standing up for women! And you’re going to get approval from others within the herd, within the bait ball, if you like, the social media “bait ball”.

I mean, there’s a few other points on there. I’ll get into it more another time.

So this is the government’s Nudge Unit. And I just thought it was interesting how you can go through this. And you can look at these events which unfold. And they’ve always got that kind of fake feel to them. They don’t feel as raw and visceral as news events did in the past. If you go back to a terrorist attack, or Rotherham, …

Just look at newsreels from the past. And they have something real about them. Whereas now just in the last few years, … I mean, you can say that this has always been the case. But I think something’s changed in the last few years. And I noticed the, I think the Nudge Unit itself only opened in 2016.

But then, as I’ve done videos on before, you get these PR management companies to manage the narratives, to get the hashtags right. They’re all there waiting, they’re all being professionally done, how they get them trending. All of the sort of the propaganda, the graphic designing. It’s all rolled out [chuckling] by PR companies to nudge the public! To get them to act in a certain way.

And in this particular thing here what I think is happening is that the kind of Left needs to be thrown back into the role of just being a sort of a victim class. They need to have the discourse reframed so that they are back fighting the system.

So now the new narrative is that it’s women standing up against these “fascist Tories”. So it puts them back where they’re comfortable, because otherwise, I mean, you’ve got too many people in this country just thinking the Left are these like sociopaths who do the bidding of the elite. But it happens more, and more, where the Tories will be like the fall guys. They kind of like being seen as being much more authoritarian than they actually are, when it comes to the Left at any rate. I mean, they’ve got these other things coming in which are basically just going to ban nationalism.

So another thing I wanted to get into is the Humza Yusuf use of the hate speech laws coming in Scotland as well.

I mean, I’m sure everybody listening to this will be aware of basically Scotland’s going full retard on the fucking hate speech laws! It’s unbelievable! You see where people can be arrested in their own home, if you’re having a private conversation in your home and somebody’s there and they get offended. Basically it’s horrible!

And you’ve got this, I think he’s a Pakistani, Humza Yusuf coming in, and he seems to revel in it as well he really seems to love the fact that he has this kind of power over the Scottish, over these White people. And I say that like quite bluntly, because that is how it seems to me. And like what irritates me is that there’s so many like shit takes in this.

[25:21]

So you again like the sort of the centrist’s types, … And I never seem to grow tired [chuckling] of slagging off the centrist’s types. But look, there’s clearly an ethnic element here, because he’s got that speech where he’s talking about how all of the institutions in Scotland are:

“White! White! White!”

And he’s fucking moaning on like that. And then you think this is a racially conscious man. He isn’t this blank slate liberal who is using the legislation in some sort of neutral way. He isn’t like a civic nationalist, or where he doesn’t see race, he doesn’t see ethnicity, or anything like that. He clearly does! And he is clearly like “the other”.

And there’s so many like bad approaches to this, and how people have taken it on. And one of them like, for example, was the women. So what they’ve done is expand the special interest groups to include like trannies and gays, and all of this, and like normal women, especially the White women in Scotland. Because the non-White women will be covered under other things.

So basically you had this situation where a lot of women were complaining that they weren’t included in the special group category. Again that’s because they’re White women, they’re Scottish women, that’s why. But then what they’re really saying there is that:

“Well, why aren’t we special? Why aren’t we included?”

But then they’re acknowledging the need for the hate speech laws in the first place. They’re sort of, as Jonathan Bowden said, that they’re kind of holding up their hand and saying:

“Well we want to be part of this as well. We want our protection!”

And I just think it’s an absolutely stupid and blind way to approach this! So there’s a lot going on with it.

And another thing is to get back to the race-blind liberal thing, Humza Yusuf isn’t that! He’s ethnically motivated! And he likes having his power. What do you think when he’s sitting with his Pakistani family, or whatever? Like what are they talking about around the dinner table? When they’re behind closed doors?

And it’s not just him. There’s groups all over the country doing it. They’re all over the country vying for power to beat down the native Whites!

So what are they actually talking about behind closed doors? Are they like when they’re among themselves, over the dinner table, their families, these ethnic minority groups, what are they saying to each other? Are they coming out with this kind of civic nationalist guff? Or are they actually quite proud at what they have achieved? How do they talk about the White population? Well we don’t know.

And nobody’s going to go into his house and like arrest him for what he said, because there’s not going to be anybody there to snitch him up! Because this is what happens when you have a cohesive group going against a bunch of individualists! And he isn’t playing that game! He’s kind of just stepping all over these liberals.

And when people call this out like, because of hate speech laws themselves, in some way. But even the way so many people think, they’re not thinking in terms of him doing this out of his own interest. They’re thinking of like he’s a fascist, or he’s a communist, or like this is the far Left.

Well I mean, in part, because they’re scared to say he’s doing this, he’s a Pakistani and he’s silencing and censoring the native population of Scotland.

The exact same things going on in England with Sarah Khan, and the new hateful extremism thing. So what I’m actually saying here will be considered illegal. And in England you had hate speech. But it was considered where you would just be like kind of insulting, and slandering, and shouting abuse about another ethnic group, or something like that. And then on the other side they had this terrorism thing as well. Which obviously, I’m not doing either one of those.

But they realized there was a gap in the middle, and that needed to be plugged! There was a problem, because people were still able to use dog whistles, and speak with a bit more nuance, be a little bit more careful about how we approach these things.

[30:14]

And they realized that was a problem, because you can still change people’s minds even when you’re not being like a total spurg, and just coming up with all kinds of racial slurs. So that, yeah, they’re going to clamp down on that now, as well. And what I think’s interesting about all of this is like.

And that’s how I would say like to the Humza Yusuf thing, is if this is what’s required to make a multicultural society function, then instead of holding up your hand and saying:

“Well you want to be included in these special groups.”

What you have to say is, say:

“Well this isn’t worth it!”

If to in order to make a multicultural society function, then we’ll just not have a multicultural society! It’s time to break it all apart! Because, at the end of the day, we weren’t asked, as they say:

“We Were Never Asked!”

We weren’t asked if we wanted to create a society which needs the surveillance state and all of this censorship to function. You can approach that from a liberal point of view. As a liberal you can say:

“Well it’s quite clear that this society, it means that my liberal values are gonna have to get thrown out! It’s not that I’m a racist. It’s not that I have any problem with this, or that group, but well, at the end of the day, the level of censorship, the level of control that’s coming in, it isn’t worth it!”

If we can’t have a liberal society and a multicultural society then these sort of the centrist types they’re going to have to make a decision! They’re going to have to say:

“Well, look, if this is what you need to do, then we’re going to have to get rid of the multicultural society!”

Or they’re going to have to throw up the hands and say:

“Well we need to get rid of the liberal society. And then just live under this totalitarianism, this tyranny!”

Which is deliberately targetting them as White liberals. Because as it stands now they’re fucked! They’ve got no way to reframe these arguments against it. And I would say, in the case of England as well, if you need this Police State, then it’s an admission that multiculturalism doesn’t work!

But I mean, the worst of the censorship – I just paused it when I was coughing there – the worst of the censorship is like look at the idea and it’s whether it’s on YouTube, it’s whether it’s Hamza’s use of Hate Speech laws in Scotland. It’s whether Sarah Khan’s new hateful extremism horseshit in England!

What I dislike about it the most, and why I’m gonna why I was decided to do this podcast is because, at the end of the day, I’m a grown man in these 40s! And I don’t need some arsehole telling me what I can and can’t say! I mean, there’s almost a pun there now. When you look at who’s at least the front of this censorship, I can’t do it! The “Khans”, the “Khan to do this”, and “Khan’t do that”! I mean, [chuckling] like a bad joke!

But I’m a grown man! I’m in my 40s, I’ve been around a bit! I’ve got the scars, and the stress, and the grey hair to prove it! I don’t need to have some wanker in Parliament to kind of come down and tell me:

“You can’t say that!”

Who the fuck are you? And you begin to see that you, I know I slag them off, these old classic liberals and stuff, where they make this big song and dance about free speech. But there is an element to it where it’s emasculating! And you get people who want their little special privileges. Because you’re admitting that these people have the right to dictate to you what you can and can’t say.

And I’m not talking about just screaming abuse like an idiot in somebody’s face, because of this, or that race. It’s just in general kind of political theories, or whatever it happens to be. I don’t want these people interfering with that. And it’s not because I want to say something extreme. It’s, because I’m a fucking adult!

And I think people internalize this infantilization that goes on with it. And it’s really destructive! And so you can see it with the way the women lined up, holding up the hands:

“Now why are we not included in this? Why aren’t we getting protections?”

Fuck all this! This society is shit!

This is the society that they’ve created. It’s one in which everybody has to be treated like a little fucking child! And we’ve had enough of it! I’ve had enough of it!

Which is why I’m kind of doing this podcast. It takes away the fact that you’re an adult, and you’ve got opinions around the world. You’re trapped like a little kid on whatever platform it happens to be, or even when you’re sitting having a few beers in the pub in Scotland now! Or you’ve got to make sure everybody that’s around you is trustworthy, and safe. Like everybody turns into mice, because they’re scared to speak their mind.

[35:18]

This is totally alien to England, by the way. I mean, yeah, I can kind of see it, the actual free speech argument in fullest here. I mean, you get problems of when people say:

“Oh well, what about if you’re subverted?”

And all of this. But at least just in terms of this, you can see how it infantilizes people. And I think it’s absolutely disgusting!

Another thing which I wanted to just sort of touch on recently. I’ve noticed in sort of the Right-wing community on YouTube, there’s been this talk of “deterritorializing” and “territorializing” things. How capital does that.

And I was thinking of that when you see these rainbow flags. Again part of this process which I’ve been talking about. And you see these like rainbow flags everywhere. And somebody was telling me that they went to a military cemetery for World War One. And so you expect to see a Union Jack, and all of this.

And instead they had like the tranny banner, the rainbow banner in a war cemetery full of monuments and things. And they’ve got that gay, you see it everywhere, the NHS had it. And like it’s all merging together, the global-homosexual empire.

But what I thought was very interesting there was that YouTube channel I really like, “All Last Things”. This is a concert from like Duluth, or one of these post-modern big brains. And you can see the process of “deterritorializing” of the patriotism of the soldiers in their graves, and the monuments, by having this horrible rainbow sort of banner fly triumphantly all over the cemetery.

So when you say like well it’s “deterritorialization”, because something’s been removed then. And you can’t prove this empirically, you can’t drag it up with a data sheet and kind of draw out the stats on this. I know that the sort of the Left, or whoever, would say:

“What are you complaining about? It’s just like a rainbow flag.”

But it isn’t! But what’s being taken away is the specialness of the graveyard full of soldiers. And instead what’s happened is really the spirit of it has been removed. And you get this sort of global-homosexual imperialism which is then flying triumphantly over the cemetery, over the soldiers dead bodies. It’s now like in a space which is now being re-territorialized by something else. And that something else is the global-homosexual empire of these values, what in the end is like the neoliberal value set.

And I think this is something quite interesting to get into it. And it’s a very interesting concept.

And I can go to a lot of places, because you get back to that thing where it’s the Kurt Cobain sort of problem that I’ve heard people mention. The more commodified and territorialized something is the more you fight against it, the worst it gets.

Like his albums are like, they get weirder, and more hardcore. Like never mind the first one was like really commercial, and they get more, and more, esoteric and he seems to lose his mind more, and more! And it wasn’t just, because he actually was going mad. And he was like a junkie, and a degenerate.

But it was also, because he was trying to find a way, he was actually against being commodified. He didn’t want to be just a product. But the problem is the more he did that the more popular he became. And the more that — shirts, and even did a song called “Radio Friendly Unit Shifter”. I mean, Smash and Pumpkins did a song:

“Despite all my rage, I’m still just a rat in a cage! There’s no escape!”

So yeah, [chuckling] I think I may do a video on that little trollop, that Bell Delphine [sp] at some point as well. Because I think she’s probably not going to make to 30, because of these reasons. But, I’ll leave that for another time.

So I think wrap this up here. It’s just a sort of my first little flying solo podcast. We’ll see how it goes. Maybe I’ll get guests on in the future. We’ll expand it a bit. But I quite like just sort of offloading what’s on my mind, where I don’t have to like do a crafted video. Where I’m walking on eggshells about what I can say. And all of this.

So it’s just about making the use of old tech, and in a kind of getting back to basics kinda way, which I quite like. So we’ll see how it goes.

Thanks for listening everybody. And I’ll catch you next time.

[41:04]

[Outro music and imagery by Theberton.]

[41:38]

END

[Readers: If you see any errors (however minor), or ways to improve things, in the transcript, please let me know in the Comment section. Also please share the link to this transcript, so others can benefit. Thanks.]

============================================

xx UNFINISHED TRANSCRIPTS — Volunteers Needed

============================================

PDF Notes

* Total words = 6,821

* Total images = 15

* Total A4 pages = xx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

Version History

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2: Mar 27, 2021 — Added images.

Version 1: Mar 26, 2021 — Published post.

Morgoth’s Review – The Frozen North & Frozen Thinking – Feb 10, 2021 — Transcript

admin — Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:11:42 +0000

[Morgoth muses on how the harsh winters of northern Europe made altruism an evolved trait that aided in our ability to survive. Which is now being used against us by the (((usual suspects))).

— KATANA]

Morgoth’s Review

The Frozen North

&

Frozen Thinking

Feb 10, 2021

Click here for the video:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/yHpad4Q8gpTx/

Published on Feb 10, 2021

BitChute Description

Morgoth’s Review

First published at 12:01 UTC on February 10th, 2021.

channel image

Morgoth’s Review

11306 subscribers

Thanks to everyone who supports my work
https://www.subscribestar.com/morgoth-s-review

Thanks to Theberton for the intros and outros

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_0K…

TRANSCRIPT

(11:15 mins)

[00:00]

[Intro music and imagery by Theberton.]

[00:29]

Hello there folks. So I’ve braved the brimstone Darcy, or whatever, and come out for a wander here in the north, the barren north. And I’m just looking at this landscape. On the one hand it’s absolutely spectacular, it’s beautiful! But, on the other hand, I’m looking at I’m thinking back in primordial ages, thousands of thousands of years ago, when European people actually had to scratch out a living on this.

I mean, these days it’s kind of we assume barrenness are places which are hard to live. And we assume that Europe and northern Europe was some bountiful place. Well it is for a small portion of the year. But like for a sizable portion of the year it looks like this. And it would have looked like this a lot more in the past. So just imagine like waking up every day and then like thinking that you’re going to have to survive in this.

Where’s the food coming from? Where, even the water that you drink is turned into a solid block! And that’s not even to mention, the fact that you’re gonna have to keep warm.

And so you get this sense that when you come out on days like this, like in the past, European people were just under assault from nature like on all sides! So I mean, some of the things that I’ve got into recently is this overcoming of nature, this conquering of the natural world.

But when you look at a place like this and you think about how people had to survive in days gone by, you can see where that drive actually originated from. Because it was just the European, the northern European, being under assault, heavy assault from nature at every turn.

And people like Kevin MacDonald have said, like this is what led to altruism on a more sort of individualistic society. I mean, one of the things I remember reading in one of his books was that if you’re a thief, or a bit of a scoundrel, in amongst, in such a harsh environment, then you will naturally just be outcasted by everybody else, because you can’t be trusted. And, you know, people will die essentially.

Whereas, if you can’t be trusted and you bought a, I don’t know, like a turnip for a piece of fish, then that’s so highly rewarded, that’s going to be become part of a network. Because that plays in with the individualist side of it, which is people scattered, just scattered, across the barren wastes. So when you actually do meet somebody else, the tendency, the incentive was to be nice and kind, and exchange goods, in order that everybody would survive. Whereas the thief, or the liar, would be thrown out.

So you can see, in a way, that this kind of harsh environment actually did lead, in the end, to a high trust society. That was kind of the argument there. Where if everybody is settled for thousands of years in this, and they have to trust each other in order to cooperate just to survive, you can see that the high trust society was kind of almost built into the DNA of the land, if you like.

There’s a big problem with this though. And it’s a tendency that leads towards universalism, which can be misused. It means you can have out groups come in and rig the game! But when we look at so many of the, say something like liberalism, you can see that it kind of shines through.

But so, this gets me back to an argument that I was having with a sort of high-tory, neo-liberal, shill type. Now I know that for a lot of these people that just loathsome lying bastards, and they’re cowards who don’t want to go against the sort of dominant orthodoxy of the day. But nevertheless, I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt here just for framing this argument a little bit.

We were talking about the, let’s just say, the changing face of England. And he was calling me a racist! And he was falling back on an argument, which basically was one of individuals. Where you shouldn’t judge groups, we shouldn’t judge whole groups, we should only judge the individual.

And the problem is that makes us blind! Because, if we go back to the idea of pathological altruism, and the idea of where we had to coordinate in the barren north in order just to scrape by in these harsh winters, then what you’re going to see is that this is something, which is specific to Europeans. And which doesn’t apply to other people from other parts of the world.

And so there’s this grim irony here, where our kind of thought processes and ways of looking at that world are being weaponized and used against us! But these people are so blind!

And, by the way, like I say — this is just to give them the benefit of the doubt — these people are so blinded by that, they can’t actually even break through it, to see that, well the other people had a different path through life, even to the evolutionary degree. They grew up and sort of came of age as groups in a different part of the world, and had a different outlook on life.

So then he’s going to say that, the assumption then, is that all of them, everybody across the world shares the same traits as the high trust northern Europeans! Even though they come from completely different environments and had different pressures on them across time.

What’s more, is that normally I don’t even talk in these kind of empirical Darwinian terms. I’m more of an idealist. But again this is like their ballpark. So these people are like classic liberals! This is their thing! These kind of scientific and empirical theories based on evolutionary pressures. And all of this that’s what they should be defending.

And it becomes so chronic that, because of the pressures mainly on society today on the propaganda we get, which I think informs their position more than any real understanding, we can sort of see that the universalism that was born out on the northern plains, has now become so such a dominant worldview that we can’t even assume that not everybody else shares it.

So another problem that we get with these people — who can’t see past the universalism, they can’t see that it’s only one group that’s actually has a historical path for that — another problem they have is this thing where it’s that you come in contact with the reality of it. The reality of it not actually being the case in the real world, and then in the abstraction. In other words, it’s to say:

“Well it should be like that! And we just have to work on it!”

And it’s not actually happening in the real world, because of this reason, or that reason. And usually they’ll cite outliers. You’ll cite one group behaves in a way which isn’t universalistic, or even I mean, more, and more, just has complete contempt for, they say, us. And then they’ll write that off as like an outlier.

But then you’ll take another one. And it’s another outlier. You say to another example. And it’s another outlier. And so all of a sudden you’ve got like the situation where the outliers are the norm! But they can’t see that, because the abstraction is still there. It should be like this, but we don’t know why!

And they don’t know why, because they are the only ones who are even expected, or have any kind of evolutionary pressure put on them for thousands of years, to think in these ways. To have that kind of intergroup altruism, if you go back to what I was talking about. When you bump into somebody and have a bit of barter and trade with them on the barren steppe of the north in winter. None of the other groups have any of that. They don’t display it! They don’t show any interest in it! And yet still! Still! You get these people, these kind of center right Tory types, these classic liberal types, who just refuse to see reality!

And funny enough, like this is another trait of this universalist European thing, is to boot everything into this fair space of abstraction, and not actually, … I mean, on the one hand it led to beautiful art, music, because you can pull it out of this here. But then at the same time it leaves people completely myopic to what’s going on, like actually on the ground!

So they’re being like cucked on all sides, and under assault from all sides, like what was once nature. So instead, it’s like humanity now! Humanity is the pressurizing force in the way that nature was in times gone by! But these idiots just can’t see it! I can’t stand them all! I can’t stand the shallow materialism as well. Because even what I’m saying now, they would ask:

“Well do you have a citation for that? Do you have this for that? Do you have?”

They can’t use reason. And they’re stuck in this kind of suicidal paradigm! And I’ve just got nothing but contempt for them!

So now that’s off my mind, I’m gonna carry on blowing the cobwebs away in this harsh barren climate! [chuckling].

I’ll catch you later folks.

[10:29]

[Outro music and imagery by Theberton.]

[11:15]

END

============================================

xx UNFINISHED TRANSCRIPTS — Volunteers Needed

============================================

PDF Notes

* Total words = 1,813

* Total images = 6

* Total A4 pages = xx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

Version History

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Feb 16, 2021 — Published post.

Andrew Joyce – A Farewell to 2020 – Dec 29, 2020 — Transcript

admin — Thu, 07 Jan 2021 11:31:36 +0000

[The Occidental Observer (TOO) contributor and scholar Andrew Joyce on the “jewish problem/question“, discusses reasons for his recent absence from podcasting, including social media outrage by Africans (and supporters) about a nationalist newspaper article he wrote, titled “The Blackening of Ireland“. Also talks about: the government Minister Alan Shatter, a jew, and his role in flooding Ireland with negros, and the upcoming sly introduction of “hate speech laws”.

He concludes wishing us good luck in 2021!

— KATANA]

Andrew Joyce

Farewell to

2020

Jan 7, 2021

Click here for the video:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/C5o9WrhKypoP/

Published on Dec 29, 2020

Bitchute Description

A Farewell to 2020

First published at 13:54 UTC on December 29th, 2020.

channel image

OccidentalJoyce

1489 subscribers

_____________

TRANSCRIPT

(18:22 mins)

[00:00]

[Intro music — The Best is Yet to Come, by Aoife Ní Fhearraigh]

[01:11]

Hello everyone. And welcome back to the Andrew Joyce podcast. I’d like to begin by apologizing for the relative lack of frequency in uploads over the last several months. Not all which has been intentional.

I have to confess that there are sometimes when I’m puzzled on seeing how productive some people are in our movement can be in terms of the number of podcasts they can produce with multimedia effects and the amount of interviews they can provide, and the constant social media activity.

As someone with work commitments and family commitments and so many other interests, and aspects of my life, I am baffled, and not all certain that I would want to be so online, as some of these people are. And certainly there has been many people over the years who have encouraged me to become a more online presence.

But I just have to say that is not something that it a goal of mine. And it’s not an ambition. It’s not a place where I want to go. And it’s not the type of activist that I want to be.

As a personality, I’m much more of a reflective type. I prefer to read, rather than write. I prefer to listen, rather than speak. And that is just the natural state of affairs for me. So whereas some of you have been asking for more content, it’s just not something that I’m going to be able to provide much of, naturally.

That being said not all of the delay in my uploading has been intentional, as I said. After the upload of my podcast on the Trump-Biden election result I was intending on once again posting at least weekly, perhaps fortnightly.

But there was a little incident in Ireland which I now want to get into, which caused my to decide that the better part of valour in this instance might be to unplug the BitChute channel for the time being, and let the storm pass over without BitChute coming under unnecessary heat for hosting content associated with me personally.

Now to rewind the clock back to the start of the year, I was approached by an Irish nationalist who goes by the name of “The Irish Patriot”, called Niall McConnell. And Niall contacted me and said that he was starting a newspaper, a nationalist newspaper in Ireland. And he said:

“Look, could you contribute a very short pieces to the newspaper. We would love to have you on board.”

And I said:

“Look, how often are you going to publish the paper?”

He said:

“Roughly once a month.”

And he would basically each month contact me and say:

“Look, we would like a piece on this. Can you produce something on that? If you can great! If you can’t, that is okay. We will maybe leave it to the following month.”

So it was a very loose and relatively informal relationship between myself and Niall. I had the freedom when he did ask me to write on these topics to more or less say what I wanted to say. And he would retain along with his editors some editorial control, and we would proceed from there.

And we have proceeded along those lines since the inauguration of the newspaper. And it’s now possibly in its sixth, or seventh, edition. So far, so uncontroversial!

One of the more recent requests from Niall was that I wrote an essay, or a very small newspaper piece, on the demographic changes that Ireland has now undergoing. Predominately of course the increase in the African population.

Now this subject seems uncontroversial to me. The fact is that Ireland as a nation is be coming more African, in the sense that it’s African population is very, very, rapidly increasing.

[Image] Alan Shatter.

A lot of this increase, as I have explored in a couple of essays is due to immigration changes that were brought about under the leadership, of the foreign and domestic office and the legal departments of a jewish Minister, called Alan Shatter, who has now left government. But while he was in government he brought about some very significant changes in how Ireland brought in foreigners, and the kind of legal status they would be given.

Now Alan Shatter at one point was declared “Man of the Year” in Nigeria. Now that should tell you something. It should tell you something loud and clear! And that is the fact that Alan Shatter made it much, much, easier for Africans to be able to migrate and become permanently resident in Ireland.

So the essay, or short newspaper piece that I wrote was basically a brief overview of some of the legislative changes that had taken place in Ireland. Some of the key personalities, and some commentary on, for example, on unemployment statistics and so on, and so forth, from some of the top Irish universities.

Now the headline of the piece appears to have caused some controversy. The headline, or the request from Niall for a piece was that he wanted any kind of content produced under the heading “The Blackening of Ireland”. I had recently written a review of a book by a lady called Claire Ellis on the origins of the ideology behind the EU, called “The Blackening of Europe”. So Niall wanted a piece specifically on the blackening of Ireland.

So that what the piece was. And in a conversation I had afterwards, after this little storm in a teacup occurred, with Richard Spencer, Spencer simply said:

“The title of the article, and the article itself sounds a little bit basic bitch!”

And the content was “basic bitch”! It was not really anything more salacious or startling than you would find in something like Amren, or Vdare, or similar websites. This was not dramatic, abusive, or inciteful content. This was fairly commonsense demographic observations albeit with a somewhat provocative title.

But the basic message remained that Ireland, as a country, certainly in some enclaves becoming blacker! The complexion, the hue of certain residents, in certain areas is certainly darkening, inline with the massive demographic changes which Ireland is undergoing.

But unbeknownst to me some enterprising individuals in some of the smaller Irish towns, like Longford, decided that they would take this particular article and print photocopies of it and distribute it as a pamphlet, basically through peoples mailboxes.

Now as I say this occurred probably about a month after I had written the piece, and without my knowledge. Would I have supported the indiscriminate distribution of the piece? I don’t know. But so be it, is my attitude. So be it! They obviously decided that the content was worthy of widespread distribution to the public, and they undertook this particular effort.

Rather predictably the pamphlet resulted in coming into the hands of some African immigrants who then posted it on social media and said they were threatened by this literature. Threatened by the title of it and what have you. Threatened by having it put through their doors.

And so they contacted the local government, and the police and everything else that they could try and create some kind of a social storm. That someone should dare to point out the “obscene” fact, … And again this is them alleging that this is “obscene”. The fact that Ireland is becoming blacker! This [is an] uncontroversial and easily demonstrable demographic fact!

So as this flared up and people were clamouring ever more tightly for the introduction of hate speech laws into Ireland, I decided, because BitChute was already coming under calls for censorship, and was already losing some of its supportive infrastructure from minor companies, I decided that it would be a good idea to put my channel to sleep temporarily. To let the storm pass over and avoid any kind of longer term structural damage to BitChute in terms of either reputation or in terms of further efforts towards it’s de-platforming.

In terms of the bigger picture the furore over the distribution of this pamphlet worried me also somewhat because the first instinct of these reactive people was to clamour for the introduction of hate speech laws in Ireland. Now these are all already in the pipeline. And like so many hate speech laws they are coming down the pipeline in a very abstract form.

Now some years ago I wrote an essay on the introduction of Hate Speech Laws in the United Kingdom, in which I pointed out that the actual legislation in which the speech laws are contained was originally designed to stop riots and public disorder linked to a miner strike in Wales. And right in the middle of this legislation they snuck in the Public Order Act, the legislation being the Public Order Act of 1986. They snuck in a little clause relating to speech that incites violence and so on, and so forth. And there is a racial element to that.

Well in Ireland currently in the pipeline as primarily designed to stop what’s been called “revenge porn”. So it’s to do with malicious communication around the distribution without permission of images of males and females who have taken sexually explicit photographs of themselves for, I suppose, the private gratification of their partners.

And these communications are then being spread more widely. And this of course is a horrible thing.

I have my own opinions about this specific type of behaviour. I think that it’s a product of the technologization of our society. It’s the product of a decline in morals and spirituality and the general debasement of the human condition. And the focus on the material and the bodily. And everything just moving towards the lowest common denominator. And we have effectively objectified ourselves. And this distribution of photographs of one another’s bodies is simply a symptom of that.

And it’s a rot that lies at the very heart of neoliberalism and the societies that we have now thrown ourselves into so it’s a serious problem! But society doesn’t want to address the causes of such behaviour. It just wants to introduce laws which can act in this “wack-a-mole” way, where we have so many problems sprouting up because the basis and foundation of society is so rotten! And we think the the way to deal with that is to endlessly create new laws and just try and imprison people for these behaviours as and when they happen.

So in the midst of creating one such law they have decided that they will tweak the language a little bit and make it equally applicable to communications regarding race, or online bullying and so on and so forth. And Irish Hate Speech Laws will come to pass wrapped in the clothing of this anti-revenge porn legislation.

So the incident worried me in that regard in that it would accelerate this kind of demand and provide some form of justification.

And in retrospect I would have my doubts about the use of that title to the piece, “The Blackening of Ireland”. I think it would have been better if a less provocative title had been used with the piece. But that it would still have been in its entirety, then printed and distributed. I think we could have perhaps reached a lot more people, but without creating just such a clamour for the introduction of such laws. Not that in any event that this furore had it happened or not happened would really have impeded the longterm progress of such legislation.

But in any case it’s Niall’s newspaper and the activists I think were acting with the best of intentions in that regard.

Now in terms of the year as a whole when I look back on it I think it’s been a pretty dismal year. And I hope that 2021 brings much more optimism.

By nature and temperament I am Chopinian [?], should I say, in the sense that I tend towards a pessimism, I tend towards a disdain for the conditions that prevail. But at the same time I do wish that circumstances and the situation were better. I just find the in so many of the people I associate with on a day-to-day basis, and so much what I see on the news and so much of what I see playing out with our people, and among our older as well, I must say. That I find it utterly disillusioning, and it fills me with so much, at times I must confess, a kind of despair.

And that I suppose also plays it’s role in the lack of production of content on my part. Sometimes quite frankly I am speechless at the situations that I see. At the stupidity of the people I encounter, and of the general lack of will in so many of our people.

So I have a tendency to retreat into reading and listening to music and trying to get in touch once more with the things of the world that do remain beautiful! And that are worth devoting the time to.

In the new year I do hope to produce more content and to once more I suppose make an effort in terms of multi-media production and getting more in contact with others as well, and having conversations with some of the leading lights that are in the movement, the spotlight.

But for the time being I must say I wish each and everyone of you very well for 2021. I thank you sincerely for listening to what I have had to say. And I simply want to say that each and everyone of you is valuable in your own way, in comprising the broader part of what we are doing.

Thank you and good luck.

[18:22]

(Readers: please enter any corrections in the comments section.)

END

top

============================================

PDF Download

top

* Total words = 2,581
* Total images = 8
* Total A4 pages = xxx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

Version History

top

Version 3: Mar 21, 2021 — Added See Also Part 3 image and links.

Version 2: Jan 8, 2021 — Added an image.

Version 1: Jan 7, 2021 — Published post. Total transcript complete = 18/18 mins.

Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2020 – Dangerfield – Dec 21, 2020 — Transcript

admin — Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:17:11 +0000

[Millennial Woes continues his tradition of yearly Millenniyule series of interviews that started in Dec, 2016.

Here he chats with the worldly and entertaining Dangerfield, an Englishman living in Cambodia. They discuss the Covid 19 issue, “grifting”, defamation, YouTube censorship, BitChute, Jordan Peterson, Douglas Murray, Lefties, bitcoin, starting own businesses, BitChute, darkweb, etc.

— KATANA.]

_______________________

Millenniyule 2020

Dangerfield

Dec 21, 2020

Click the link below to view the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZOaF8-9OJc

Also on BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/-ZOaF8-9OJc/

YouTube Description

Published on Dec 21, 2020

Millenniyule 2020: Dangerfield
9,548 views
•Streamed live on Dec 21, 2020
861
52
Share
Save
Millennial Woes
56.5K subscribers
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSkC…
https://www.t.me/strangerfield
http://www.millenniyule.com
https://www.millennialwoes.com/donate

174 Comments

__________________________

TRANSCRIPT

(61:38)

[00:00]

Woes: Red Pill Germany. Then Bitcoin Beginnings. That’s with Karl Thorburn. And then Jared Taylor. And Jared Taylor will be on Dlive only. So please make sure you’re subscribed to that, to me on Dlive.

But first it’s Dangerfield. It’s Chris Dangerfield. Now I should also say just before we get to that, E Michael Jones has been rescheduled. So tomorrow night there are going to be five hangouts. But do we still use the word “hangouts”? I can’t remember. Anyway there’re going to be five streams and E Michael Jones will be at midnight GMT, tomorrow night.

So with that said, I’ll just do the necessary linky stuff with Telegram, and so forth. There we go.

And Dangerfield, welcome to Millennial 2020!

Dangerfield: What an absolute pleasure! Three years on the trot I think now.

Woes: Yes! I think 2018 was the first time. I wasn’t aware of you with Millennial 2017. But by 2018 I think had you started doing the Three Stooges by that time.

Dangerfield: I think that’s probably where that link was made. I went [chuckling] and had a look at it and survived about five minutes!

Woes: What was that? Was it quite amateurish?

Dangerfield: I don’t watch my content back anyway. Not, because I’ve got any issues with my voice. Because I’ve been in stand-up. And I’ve been in bands all my life. So I’m used to hearing my voice.

But eeeehh! It was just a bit, you know, when things are significant, and important to you, they’re really significant! And they’re really important! And then when they’re no longer that important. And you see yourself with them fuuckk, blooody! I was like, oh, come on!

You know, it’s like when I watch videos around that Gamergate period, when I’m talking about, you know, transgender toilets. And it’s like it’s the most important thing in the world to me. And today I, well lack of a better phrase, couldn’t give a shit about [Woes laughing out loud] gender neutral toilets!

Woes: Yeah, it’s funny back, well in 2015 that stuff did seem important. And I guess it was important for a lot of people who were, …… I mean, I started in 2014 knowing Western civilization is in a terrible condition. And I don’t think I believed at that point that it was literally the end of Western civilization. I do now. But definitely I knew that things were very, very serious.

But then you’d get people who were more concerned with, who were baffled, rather than doomers. They were more like just:

“Well, what the hell is going on? Why are these feminists always moaning about this and that? And this trans thing and gay marriage! We never voted for that! And mass immigration, Islam!”

You’d get people who were still feeling around and trying to work out the scope of the problem. But I mean, a lot of them still don’t get the scope of the problem, even now, of course. I think that, I won’t name names. But there are people who still think that this is actually quite a trivial problem. And it’s just there are just some silly people who are “woke”. The woke people. They don’t get this is actually a very deep civilizational malaise.

[03:45]

Dangerfield: Sure. I think something else that affected me was, for various reasons, 2020 has made me, …

Well I might as well actually go into it. I mean, once I turned up in that Times article. I don’t know if you’re aware. I don’t know if anyone watching is aware. There was a Hope Not Hate had done some, what they usually do they decided to call out loads of dissident YouTubers. And the Times picked it up. And I was in that article.

And the article was about terrorism! It was about people who are actually planting bombs! They had these images that I had never seen before! I wouldn’t be surprised if they made them up, you know, skulls wearing Waffen SS helmets! And just bizarre images that have nothing to do with my experience of the dissident Right.

Woes: Was it a Photoshop of you holding a bomb, or something?

Dangerfield: Well it might, just as well have been. But they had me in this, you know, sandwiched in there. And although they couldn’t outright say I was involved the implication was. And they said I was grooming teenage Nazis! And this stuff’s serious! I just thought I had to step back from that.

And I luckily, about three weeks before that all happened, I had already decided to make some changes to my account. I thought now the climate has changed. YouTube, with the glory days of like 2010, you say anything you want! You build up a back catalog. You make money out of your back catalog. People can find your channel. They can binge watch five, six hundred videos. And I had about 600 videos.

But before the Times article I started thinking my 600 videos are actually the potential for people to use that content against me. Nearly all my videos were improvised. I’ve written about two scripts. And a lot of its jokey. A lot of its edgy jokey. And people can take that stuff out of context. They can put, …

Woes: Let me just interject briefly, because I know that this is an important story that you’re telling. And I don’t want to interrupt it.

But I mean, Hope Not Hate still use against me something that I said as a joke four years ago! At the end of 2016. I said that I think I might be pro slavery. It was like, yeah someone had asked me:

“What’s your most controversial, or your most outrageous Right-wing opinion?”

So it was like two in the morning. I’ve been streaming for two hours. I was exhausted. And so I just said, oh, that. There we go. Obviously a joke. And I’ve corrected it. I’ve clarified it multiple times! Surprisingly enough, I’m not pro-slavery!

But Hope Not Hate continued to use this, because it’s useful to them. And they can get away with doing that. I mean, they shouldn’t be able to get away with doing that. And this is again why I wish that we had, …

This is, you know, people often scoff at me when I say that the movement needs big funding. But this is an example of exactly why. We should be able to just fucking sue these cunts!

[06:52]

Dangerfield: Yeah.

Woes: You are misrepresenting me! You’re deliberately, you’re knowingly misrepresenting me! But we can’t, because we don’t have the funding to do that. And they will use that to get me de-platformed. Get me banned from things. So yeah, we need funding, surprisingly enough.

Dangerfield: Well that’s something we can get onto a bit later. Because I’ve been pulling what’s left of my hair out recently about this whole “grifting” thing:

“You’re grifting! You’re people are voluntarily donating to your stream you grifter!”

You don’t get that on the Left. The Left aren’t complaining about earning money. It’s just all our lot. I get it every day! Emails sent to me!

Woes: That’s another, that’s a problem from within our movement.

Dangerfield: Yeah!

Woes: And there’s a lot to say about that. I mean, I haven’t asked for money. I did the other night just as a one-off, because someone else brought it up. But other than that, I haven’t asked for money since March 2019, march last year. And people still moan at me for that.

Dangerfield: But I think that’s your detriment! I think that’s your detriment! And I think it’s your detriment, because of the environment you find yourself in. Anyone watching this channel give Woes some money! He’s doing five streams every day almost! This is hard to organize! Believe me, I do one stream, I kark out for an hour afterwards. Give him some money!

But I’d say that you don’t ask for money, because that environment is so toxic! If you were to:

“He’s asking for money out there! He’s only put five hours working today!”

Woes: I mean, in my specific case I can understand people not donating, because apart from Millenniyule, I’ve hardly made anything for two years, right? That’s a specific case. This is why I don’t really ask for money, because I don’t feel, I think it would be cheeky.

But the more broad point is there is a thing in this movement of you should be doing this for the love of it. You should be doing this, because you care about your country. Of course, I fucking do!

I mean, if you were doing this for the money you’d be doing something else. [Dangerfield laughing] You could make a lot more money far more easily by doing anything but this!

[09:09]

Dangerfield: Yeah!

Woes: It’s just a silly thing for people to say. But I think it’s a sort of purity spiraling thing.

Dangerfield: Without a doubt.

Woes: Does he ask for money? Well then he’s a fake! He’s a grifter! It’s:

“You should be suffering! You should not be able to get a normal job! And you shouldn’t be asking for money. You should be just the lowest in the lowest position you could be in. And then I’ll believe that you’re genuine!”

Dangerfield: It’s absurd!

Woes: It’s insane! And it’s not how our enemies got anywhere. Our enemies never had this mentality. They were completely shameless, right? It was, they’re thinking:

“Well, I’m doing something good, so why shouldn’t I get remunerated for that!”

Their attitude was:

“We want as much money as possible, because that creates options, and it strengthens us, and so on.”

But, of course, it’s a completely different, … And I remember Hope Not Hate again saying that I was begging! They used the word “begging” for money! But when they put out a funding drive on Twitter to ask for like tens of thousands of pounds to make up for their budget shortfall, well they’re not begging!

Dangerfield: No, of course, not.

Woes: They’re doing a good thing! [loud laughing] They’re doing good work, ruining people’s lives!

Dangerfield: Madness!

Woes: Scum!

Woes: Yeah, so we were talking about how the movement has evolved.

Dangerfield: And yeah, I realized that the environment’s different. I had five, six hundred videos. And I realized that people can chop bits out of it, you know, I was seeing the sorts of things that were happening to other people.

And I thought, you know, for the handfuls of views, literally like 20 a week my old content got, it’s not worth having that there. It makes me vulnerable. So I deleted it. You can’t even put it in private. You can get strikes for private videos. It might be private to the viewers. But it’s not private to YouTube. I got a strike for a video I’d already deleted! But that’s a different story.

So luckily I got rid of most of that. But they’d obviously done their research before I done all that, because in that time thing, … It was amazing! The quote they put in there, was I’d done a series of videos called “Talking with Teens”. And I said to my viewers:

“Are there any teenagers?”

I said:

“Not 13, 14. 16 and above really, who want to come on my channel and talk about life as a 16 year old, or as a teenager?”

That was it! That was it! They made out it was a like some kind of Nazi recruitment drive! And it wasn’t!

One of them was this kid with Asperger’s who couldn’t get a girlfriend. One of them was a kid whose parents were disabled, and life was a nightmare for him. It was a wide range of different topics, different kids at university.

[12:14]

And one of them who had Right-wing views was saying that he does try and get his Right-wing ideas into debates at university. And I said to him:

“Listen. I’d suggest not doing that. Keep your head down, because the liberal machine doesn’t want people like you at university.”

Basically trying to encourage him to keep his place at university. And they used that quote. They said:

“Dangerfield even told one of them to keep his head down, because the liberal machine!”

If it was some kind of evil thing!:

“You can’t encourage people to keep their place at university!”

Woes: So that’s like, okay you’ve got a message so just blare it out indiscriminately regardless of the consequences. If it will actually work, or not. If it will backfire on you, or not. Just talk! Just say it! That’s retarded! The real world doesn’t work like.

I mean, again you’ve got to look at what our enemies did. And I’ve said this so many times to so many people about so many different examples.

In 1967 they campaigned to legalize homosexual sex, right, behind closed doors, between two consenting adults. What they didn’t do in 1967 was say to the British public of 1967:

“We want drag queen story hour.”

Because they knew that the British public of 1967 were not ready to hear that, to tolerate it. They would go nuts if they heard that! So they met the public where they were. That’s just human communication. You’re meeting people where they are. This seems to be completely obvious.

So that’s to do with what you actually say, but also the context in which you say it. So you don’t do this at a fucking dinner, like a cheese and wine evening, or at a friend’s wedding, or something like that. It’s specific context where this will work. Where it’ll just backfire on you and turn you into a leper! [laughing]

Dangerfield: The crazy thing is its people like Hope Not Hate that made me say to this bloke:

“Don’t say things like that at university, because they’re part of that problem.”

And then they used it against me, and the Times used it against me.

So the point is though, the upshot is, the climate has changed. And this idea of having a channel with hundreds of videos, I think that’s finished! I think it’s interesting that people especially on the dissident Right, they’re now on Dlive, you know, that everyone’s gagging for BitChute to sort out streaming, because I think streaming’s where it’s going now. You don’t want all that stuff out there, that makes you really vulnerable!

[15:07]

You want to do a stream, people watch it live, when it’s finished, it’s done! The amount of people who are putting videos on YouTube now. And when it’s finished it’s gone! You don’t get to see it. And people are like:

“Oh, does anyone know where I can see that? No it’s gone.”

And what I do now, I stream twice daily. And when I’ve got five streams live, I’d chop a couple off the end. I record two more, I chop two off the end. So there’s only ever five, or six, up there. Now, if I do an interview stream, or if I do a stream that’s quite playful and not really political, I’ll leave that up.

But, yeah, I realized this year that I’m not going to let my YouTube channel make me vulnerable. I’m going to do something else.

And I’ve changed from being reactive to proactive. I’m not interested in looking at the news and laughing at it, or getting all mad about it. I’m more into trying to give advice, or discuss ideas that we can actually do in our daily lives. Again, because you have to, because you’re not allowed to do that other stuff anymore.

Woes: Yeah, it’s definitely a different climate. I don’t like, as you’ve said, you can’t really afford to have a big archive of all your past stuff anymore. I don’t like that, because I loved that there were all these old videos that I was still proud of some of them I was a bit embarrassed about but, you know, from the early days. But still I was happy to have them up. And that was a way that people discovered my channel and discovered me.

But YouTube throttled that anyway, because they stopped recommending you. You stop appearing in the recommended lists. So these videos were no longer useful to me in that sense. But they made me vulnerable.

Dangerfield: Yeah.

Woes: But, of course, the thing is when you take them down that means that no one can watch them anymore. And that is a shame! There are videos that I made, I mean, there’s basically nothing left on my channel about, you know, race, ethnicity, Islam.

Dangerfield: Same! Same.

Woes: There’s nothing left! And I think it’s a fucking shame!

Dangerfield: Yeah. Well, this is the mad thing! You can go in my back catalogue, YouTube are fine with stories of when I was a junkie, when I was a crackhead, doing the most horrific things! No that’s fine! And the press won’t call me out about that.:

“Oh, that’s no problem! You can inject in your groin, you can take a dump in the middle of the street, you can have a girl stop breathing when you’re having sex with her. Those videos aren’t a problem! This is YouTube, you’re fine!”

And those videos are literally still up! But everything about race? No. Got rid of all of it! You just can’t! That conversation isn’t allowed unless you’re pro those ideas, you’ll lose your channel.

[18:08]

Woes: Yeah. I mean, this is what’s so frightening about YouTube, they actually got rid of the slogan “broadcast yourself”. For a long time that was YouTube slogan for like, 10, 11, 12 years. They got rid of it.

Styx, actually, Styxhexenhammer, made this point about a year ago, or less six months ago, that YouTube got big in the first place, because it wasn’t the mainstream media. And it wasn’t the authorized word. It was little ordinary people putting their voices out there and growing big, because it was independent voices basically.

But now YouTube has obviously decided:

“We really don’t want this anymore. Yes it’s what made us, it’s what made the platform in the first place, but we don’t need it anymore. And it’s causing us a headache. We’re having to employ thousands of moderation staff and censors.”

So I think that they’ve just decided to basically get rid of all of it. And I think in time they will shut down every channel that’s political, unless it’s explicitly progressive. I think even centrist channels will go, as well.

Dangerfield: I think it’s an interesting point, because it’s been a bait and switch really. Make a channel, do this, establish the most successful video hosting platform on the internet. And let’s not forget after Google, it’s the biggest search engine! People go to YouTube after Google more than anywhere else to search things! You know, they don’t mind that the content is video. And I think it’s now like it’s an albatross, they’re absolutely gutted. But they can’t just shut it down, because then they hand that power over to someone like BitChute.

So I think you’re right. I think they have board meeting after board meeting and they’re pulling their hair out!:

“What are we gonna do about this!”

Which is [chuckling] good! You’re lumbered with it Alphabet [Google’s parent company]

Woes: Yeah. They’re in this weird position where they can’t afford to hand the cultural power to some other website, of being the political video place. Because that’s a huge amount of cultural power for any platform to handle. They want to have that power.

But at the same time they don’t want to have those political videos on their platforms! [chuckling] It’s like it’s a very difficult dilemma for them. And I guess what they’re doing is just slowly throttling it.

But I think what they’ll also do is, I think they’ll set up rivals to BitChute. I think Silicon Valley will deliberately create, because I do believe that, … For what it’s worth I have talked to the BitChute guy, once, or twice. And he is not very Right-wing. He’s not a nationalist. That’s worth saying. He’s just a guy who genuinely believes in free speech! That’s actually the truth. But he does genuinely believe in free speech.

And that’s the thing! Silicon Valley don’t. So what I think they’ll do is they’ll create rivals to BitChute in order to drive traffic away from BitChute. And then they’ll just shut down each of those.

[21:23]

Dangerfield: They’ll have a struggle though. I talk to Ray a lot, and BitChute is absolutely smashing it! He said I think they got 40 million unique viewers in November! It’s now something like, I think it’s something like the 800th most popular website in America. So out of everything. But it’s about 800. And this is two guys! This is Ray and his mate.

And what’s making BitChute a real threat to them now, isn’t a handful of Nazis, because no one really cares about that, it’s now starting to look like YouTube in 2010. There are people doing makeup, how to put your makeup on, whatever they’re called. There are people doing unboxing videos. Oh! It isn’t suddenly this evil dissident Right channel, it’s a video hosting platform. And it’s growing remarkably fast!

Woes: Yes it is.

Dangerfield: And in terms of what YouTube are going to do about that, I can remember a few years ago when they considered Jordan Peterson to be problematic. Well, I asked my subscribers the other day to give me a one in the chat, how many times do you get recommended Jordan Peterson videos. And everyone said:

“Yes!”

I get recommended Jordan Peterson after whatever I watch now. And I think that’s the angle they’re taking.

Woes: This is amazing isn’t it? [chuckling] I mean, Jordan Peterson is this guy who’s, it’s like they just wheel him out constantly! Like a thousand times a day gets wheeled onto the stage to do the thing!

But he’s, I don’t know what to say about that. He’s ineffectual, he’s unconvincing! Yes it’s true that you should tidy your room up! I’m hoping that my background doesn’t look too untidy while I say those words. But yes it’s true that you should get your own life certainly. I’ve always said that! I will make a point of emphasizing that in future. I think it’s better for people to be doing that than to be thinking about, to be leapfrogging that, to:

“Oh! I’ve got to change the world!”

Best if you get your own life under control first. Then you’re in a better position to change the world. Anyway.

That’s his one, that’s really the only good thing that he said, as far as I can see, Jordan Peterson. The rest of it is just flim-flam and waffle! And as he said it himself, that he’s trying to divert people, young men, away from nationalism, identity politics.

Dangerfield: And that’s what YouTube are now trying to do with him, as well. I think that’s the angle. They’re now trying to say:

“All right, you don’t have to be a progressive, but how about this? Because you don’t have to go over there and look at all that stuff! Because look, we like Jordan! Look, here he is! Yeah loads, loads of him! Read it!”

[24:12]

Woes: Fucking take your Jordan Peterson! [loud laughing] Be grateful! Enjoy it! Yeah, the message is:

“Don’t worry! You don’t have to be a progressive. You can be a complete cuck instead! You can be completely ineffectual instead!”

So that’s the option. [chuckling] But it is hilarious. Again it maps into this thing that I have this theory. That there are two poisons. One of them is progressivism, or communism, and the other is Libertarianism, or individualism. And they’re two different poisons designed to appeal to two different key parts of the European psyche. Altruism; communism, progressivism. And in the individual, the sort of innovation that independent-mindedness, that’s what Libertarianism appeals to.

And basically you can get almost any White person with one of those two poisons. And that’s why they’re there! Because they both end up in the same place! Which is that you’re an atomized, demented, individual, with no history, no identity, no meaning in your life, you’re just meat! You’re just meat that consumes and buys things!

Dangerfield: Sure.

Woes: Each of those two poisons results in the same end result.

So I think that Jordan Peterson is basically, he’s probably a well-meaning guy, who has been utilized to make that happen. So either you go with feminism. YouTube will give you these two options. It’s either fucking communist, Marxist, feminism, or it’s Jordan Peterson! Those are your options.

And, of course, they’ll also throw Douglas Murray in there, occasionally. You know, a bit spicy well. [loud laughing]

Dangerfield: The thing about Douglas, that’s hilarious, is this is the man that writes, “The Strange Death of Europe”. But ask him for a solution, and the geezer runs a mile! He doesn’t want to go anywhere near the solutions! And so, that’s why you’ll get Douglas Murray. We can all sit back and read and go:

“He’s right! Yes! Put the book down and then watch some Jordan!”

But you can’t dare say:

“Well look, we know this is now happening. Here’s some people who’ve got some ideas that might, maybe change the course of history. No you could [mimics Murray waffling on].”

Woes: Yeah, at that point Jordan Peterson will tell you [mimicking Peterson]:

“Don’t get into the identity politics!”

And Douglas Murray will say:

“Oh well, this is reminding me of the 1930s!”

Dangerfield: There you go.

Woes: So okay, I mean, that’s where he always goes to immediately is:

“Ideas from the 1930s, ..”

He always fucking does that! [Dangerfield chuckling] He nods his head, it’s a signal to the interviewer to nod his head in agreement. And it always works.

But this is his sort of cucky, just don’t care about, I don’t know what to say! I get so exasperated whenever I start talking about Douglas Murray, because he’s so annoying!

Because he comes across as very intelligent, erudite. But I just think he’s selling, he’s just selling a sort of very discerning, stuffy, version of cuckoldry. And cowardice!

[27:47]

Dangerfield: Yes.

Woes: I want to like him. But I just wish that he would man up!

Dangerfield: Well no, you nailed it. It’s that cowardice. It’s like looking at someone dying and just writing about them dying. And the last chapter is:

“And then they died.”

Okay. Thanks for your help.

Before we move on, because I can feel that’s happening, I just want people watching to just enjoy the fact that we all hate YouTube! We hate what it’s done. We hate what they’ve done to us all. We hate the bait and switch. But it is a real pest for them! It’s causing them big problems! And that’s at least something we can enjoy.

Woes: Well, the fact is, they’re still writing reports about us. They’re still campaigning against us. They’re still lobbying social media to ban us, and so on. So they’re obviously still worried about it.

I mean from my point of view I don’t really want, and I never did want, to be involved in politics, direct politics. Because I always knew I’m not, I wouldn’t be any good at that.

But I do take an interest in dissidence. In general opposition to what I see as an encroaching, … Well frankly, at this point, an encroaching Police State. And I was always against political correctness, that kind of thing. So that remains the case. And I think that’s enough to make them worried about you.

You don’t need to be an explicitly whatever, anti-immigration, anti-Islam, anti-LGBT. Just the fact that you’re an independent voice. That you don’t have the rainbow flag somewhere on your channel. That you’re not voicing support for whatever, the latest BLM, that’s enough to make them think:

“Okay, you’re not on board. Because if you were on board we would know you were on board.”

And I think it’s got to this point where you’re either with them, or they assume that you’re completely against them.

[29:55]

Dangerfield: But I think there’s ways around it, because again, coming off of the back of that rethinking what I was gonna do as a channel, and deleting all the content. You know, this year I’ve mainly been telling people to start looking after themselves. Start dressing better. Start dressing well. Look after yourself. Get some nice shoes, get a suit made.

And this is where I’m going. This is what my content’s about. Set up neighborhood watch organizations, you know, community building actually works.

And I think they’re gonna struggle to ban channels like that. And the thing is, it’s overtly nationalist to talk about that. Set up revenue streams for yourself. Some passive, dress well, have self-respect, look after your body, set up things that involve your community.

And if people start doing those sorts of things, that will help the nationalist project as a whole immeasurably. And YouTube are going to struggle with that are they going to shut my channel down, because I’ve been telling people to see a bespoke tailor. [Woes laughing]

Woes: The latest horror that YouTube is profiting from is giving a platform to people who talk about this [laughing]

Dangerfield: But exactly, you know, I see channels like we Renew Britannia, Wes [?] bless him! A young man set up a channel, done loads of work, got very popular, gone! No strikes, or anything, they just got rid of him! And I just thought Wes, and I told him this:

“You’re in the 2016 model of dissidents. And they’ve got the TOS [Terms of Service] now to just wipe you off! You can’t do that anymore. But what you can do instead of that reactive stuff, don’t talk about.”

I can’t even think what, ..

Woes: The latest atrocity.

Dangerfield: Yeah! Don’t talk about that! Talk about things we can actually do to be proactive. And it kind of keeps us safe. And it’s worth doing.

Woes: Yes. And it’s also more productive. I mean, I think it’s better. It just makes you feel better, than constantly ruminating over what the Left has done now, or what some foreign element has done now. Because then you’re just their victim. And you’re constantly waiting for them to do the next thing so that you can then be outraged about it. That isn’t a good, it’s unhealthy! And I did unknowingly, unwittingly, do that for a while.

And I remember one stream I did in 2016 with my two friends, Reactionary Expat and Pale Hominid, we were going over the news, we did it once a month, and we’re going over the news of what everything that had happened in that month. And it was just unbelievable! I think it was in like June, July that year. And it was just an astonishing catalogue of things that had happened across Europe with the migrants, and so on. And I did think while I was doing it:

“Is this actually helping anyone?”

And then in the next year, in 2017, I started to have more doubts, because I started to think:

“Well we all know all this already, and there must be something more.”

And that’s what I’ve always been thinking about. That’s just partly why I was inactive for so long, because I was thinking:

“Well, now that we know the problem, or now that we at least have enumerated the symptoms of the problem, now what? Because there’s no point just continuing to do that, because that really is just, that actually is grifting. That’s just, you know, milking people’s disaffection. So what to do next?”

And I really wasn’t sure. But it’s at the point, I’ve kind of reached a similar conclusion to the one you’ve reached. Which is, it’s better to just encourage people to work on themselves.

And actually, the best way you can do that is to do it yourself, and be an example, I think, to other people. So that’s what I intend to do in future. I wanted to do it this year, but things got waylaid by Covid and the lockdown. And by other things as well, that we don’t need to go into. But yeah, that was my plan for this year.

[34:19]

Dangerfield: No, for sure! And look I understand there is an argument perhaps that:

“Well, we all know what the problems are, but maybe youngsters don’t.”

But they live it! They go to their schools, they’re seeing what’s happening. You know, they’re living it! They know what the problems are don’t worry about that! They’re not having to predict them, they live them! And there’s channels like this is why we fight. Very proactive, you know, talking about self-sufficiency. And they’ve got this ward idea they do. It’s a very small channel at the moment, but it’s really optimistic! And people come away from that feeling empowered!

Woes: What channel is that?

Dangerfield: It’s called “This is Why We Fight”. It’s very small. But they’re actually trying to strategize about the things that we need to do. We need to build stronger communities. We need to be more sufficient self-sufficient. And we need to get away from corporations.

The reason I talk about clothes, and my subscribers are getting proper sick of it! We’ve had a different culture imposed upon us! When I see people walking around in sportswear, that’s not English! That’s nothing to do about history that wasn’t a development that come through the Edwardians, and the Victorians, and through the wars, and all of a sudden. No! That’s been imposed on us by massive corporations, who have outright shown that they hate us! They hate us!

And I see loads of people walking around, especially the youth, in what is essentially African-American streetwear. And it’s appalling! And if you’re going to support that and give your money to those corporations, bearing in mind your polyester trousers are going to wear out in a year and you’re going to have to buy a new pair, compared with a bespoke suit which is in the classic style. Which is part of our ancestry, part of our history. A local tailor with cloth sourced from England, or Scotland, or the UK. It’s becoming more local. That is overtly nationalist, and it’s going to last you 20, 30 years.

[36:26]

Woes: Yeah.

Dangerfield: And these are the things that I’m now talking about. Because all that other stuff you were saying. About those channels where people read the news, I can’t watch them! I don’t want to see White people getting the shit kicked out of them for breakfast! I don’t want to finish my day’s work and:

“Oh, I see. They burnt down another church in France!”

And it does depress you. And then the problem with that is everyone’s getting black-pilled. Black-pilled gets rid of hope and optimism. And without hope and optimism you can’t win any fights! You lose them all!

Woes: Yeah. Very much. I think it’s an interesting thing, because you’ve got to be careful about the lessons that you learn. Because the lessons that you learn will affect your behavior going forward. But the lessons you learn are selected by the things that you do. So if you do things that are going to result in failure, then you’re going to learn the lesson of failure.

Dangerfield: Sure. Sure.

Woes: So, in other words, if you focus on what’s going bad in the world, then that is going to get you down. And then that in turn is going to make you feel impotent! And that’s not surprising. And so I think you’re absolutely right! That it’s better to focus on what you can do and, as you say, a proactive attitude.

Because, god knows, there’s enough shit going on. I mean, seriously I’m the same as you. I cannot watch a lot of stuff that once upon a time I watched religiously. I just can’t do it anymore! It’s too depressing.

Now, someone made the point in the live chat that there are a lot of people just arriving at certain realizations, and they do need to see this stuff. And that’s true. But I’m happy for other people to show them, this stuff.

Dangerfield: Spend a couple of hours on BitChute, you’ll be fine.

Woes: Yeah! Yeah, exactly!

Dangerfield: The other thing is, look England, I keep saying England, but Great Britain, is still probably one of the best places on the planet to live! It still is! By a long chalk! It’s a fantastic place! If you want to generate revenue, the UK is a fantastic place to be in! You can generate wealth there! The amount of people here going:

“Well there’s no jobs! There’s no jobs!”

Fuck jobs! Generate wealth! Make a job! I live in a country where there’s no welfare. If you’d haven’t got any money, you don’t eat. And so people create wealth. They generate it so that they can eat. And they manage to feed families of 20, 30 people, because they have to!

And how easy it is to do that in the UK, is unbelievable! It’s still a fantastic nation! And also if we’re generating wealth, setting up businesses, making passive, and active revenue streams. If we’re doing that, that money isn’t available for, let’s just say, other people. It makes you stronger. It’s overtly nationalist to make money. It’s overtly nationalist to be an entrepreneur. And so encourage people to do this, especially young people. Because they’re walking around saying:

“Well, there’s no jobs!”

Woes: Get into crypto! [loud laughing] This is one of the reasons I want people to get into crypto, because I know there are no jobs. It’s shit! And it’s not something that I want to take lightly at all, or trivialize.

But, as Dangerfield says, you could start your own business, or you could get into crypto and investments. And I know how ridiculous that sounds to a lot of people who are young, who don’t have any money! But just trust me on this. Well you don’t need to trust me on this, you can do what you like.

But I would advise that you get into to crypto. And I definitely would advise that you look for other thing ways that you could make yourself useful to the community. And including your local community, as well, not just the online community.

[40:30]

Dangerfield: There are, I mean, look I’ve got crypto. I’ve made and lost a fortune in crypto. It’s gambling! It’s gambling! That’s all it is really.

But I think if you spread your portfolio, bit of precious metals. And you haven’t got to go and buy a kilo of gold. You can go and buy a gram of gold. Get one of them every few months. Get a couple of grams of silver, then chip a little bit into your crypto.

But there’s just so many ways of generating money in a nation like England, in somewhere like Great Britain. You don’t only have to wait for someone to give you a job. You could just find ways to make money. You know, I lost the one that I had though. I had an example of something. But I would be a bit careful about just putting all your money into crypto.

Woes: Oh yeah.

Dangerfield: I mean, a good old ISA [Individual Savings Account] is still a good way, a reliable way, of making your money go up. I’d probably say if you haven’t got a lot of money, an ISA is a better idea than crypto, at this stage.

But if you come into a few grand maybe, maybe put a grand into crypto, and then four grand in your ISA. And get your 20 grand annual ISA allowance.

Woes: Yeah. I mean, this is the kind of stuff that I would rather be telling people. And that I would rather people were finding. This is much more useful to you than, :

“Oh! Another mosque built in this, and another town!”

Yeah that is bad! It’s depressing! It’s another sign of the cultural change. But the issue is, well what are you going to do? What can be done about it? And that’s something I’m not sure we should go into in this stream. But I think that we need to start thinking very practically, put it that way. Because dreaming that:

“Well, if we complain enough about this, then the powers that be will change their minds about it.”

That’s obviously not the case. They would have changed their minds about it in 1960, if they were going to do that, or 1970, but not now. So I mean, yeah, again we’re veering into territory that I don’t think is safe for YouTube anymore.

But all I would say is I’m not saying don’t care about this. Of course you should care about this. But I think that you should approach it in ways that are realistic. Because there are so many people who just are not realistic about these things.

[43:02]

Dangerfield: I think that the point I was going to say was there are countless resources on the internet for entrepreneurs who haven’t got a pot to piss in. You can go and join these forums and you can read countless stories of people who are in situations like you might be, where you’ve just left school, or you’ve just left university. You’re living at your parents house and there’s no employment, or there’s nothing exciting. You don’t want to wash dishes down your local hospital.

And there’s thousands, upon thousands, of stories in full detail, because people are proud of what they’ve done! How they’ve done it, how they set up their business. There’s no one way to be an entrepreneur! There’s the way you do it that’s successful.

And, rather than sitting around watching videos of bombs going off all the time, or god knows what, you could be spending that time on entrepreneurial forums reading how people done it. Doing that kind of research. Looking at your options. Start putting a little bit of money together away. So when you’ve got your five grand, you can make a little investment. And then you can start turning it over, doing a product, or a service, or whatever it is you want to do, based on the stuff you’ve learned from these forums.

And again, that will make us stronger. That makes us stronger as individuals. When you’re stronger as an individual and you’ve started generating wealth you’re more likely to have bigger families. So if we’re having bigger families across the nation, you know, once you’ve got bigger families happening then you start getting stronger communities. And then you can obviously see where I’m going with that.

It’s just a question of being proactive about our future, rather than just dwelling on this reactive stuff, that had a function four years ago. But now, not so much.

Woes: Yeah, I agree. Well, we’re at 45 minutes now, so we should probably finish in about 15 minutes, just for the sake of my health. But before we do that would you like to talk about 2020? Because that’s what we were thinking we were going to do. We’ve actually gone on a 45-minute detour. But we were going to talk about the year, or your general feelings about this year. So what would you say about that?

Dangerfield: Well, it seemed to start with, … I am the eternal optimist and I’m eternally hopeful. Because I know that, strategically that’s important. Psychologically that’s important. And the year seemed to start very optimistically on various fronts, various projects. And I remember thinking, this is interesting — got to be a little bit careful with this bit, because again we’re on YouTube — but what’s just happened in America seems to be quite a disaster really. The year’s ended disastrously, because I think without the “God Emperor” — do I really have to say:

“I know he’s not our man.”

Why does everyone always say that after they mention him? I know he’s not our man, all right? Everyone knows he’s not a man. But the alternative really isn’t our man. And he’s against us!

Woes: Oh yes.

Dangerfield: And that’s been quite, … You know, when I heard Greg Johnson talking about the realities of — I think it was Greg — the realities of what is going to happen when that man starts doing things concerning people like us, it seems to have ended quite the opposite. The year ended quite on the opposite of how it started. I started the year thinking:

“Wow! This is amazing, this is amazing! Look what’s happening here!”

And this little turnout has proven shocking. And again I know you can’t say too much. But I am convinced what’s being said that happened, is what happened.

Woes: It’s amazing how cryptic we have to be! Unbelievable! But yeah, so am I. I’m also convinced that what is being said happened, did happen, yeah.

Dangerfield: And you’re not allowed to talk about it. Which doesn’t make me think:

“Oh, okay, then I’m wrong.”

It makes me think:

“Well yeah, thanks for confirming my suspicions.”

Woes: Let me, actually I’ve got a good thing that I could read out to you, because I was thinking how could how to fit this into to Millenniyule. And I found this thing. Did I accidentally, I think I might have accidentally closed it. Ah shit! I think I have. Damn! How annoying!

There was a thing that I find on Facebook, because I hardly ever go to Facebook nowadays. But I did the other day. And someone was basically making the point that, imagine if we’d had the attitude to news and commentary that we have today. Imagine if we’d had the same attitude throughout history. Basically so many things wouldn’t have happened. Even the founding of America. And then the American civil war, and so on. All of these things it would have been fact checking, you know, rumor control, authorized sources. All of this would have thwarted any sort of innovation, or change, basically!

You see that’s what this is now. What’s emerged with social media is an engine to maintain the status quo, and to direct people in certain ways. But especially to just maintain the status quo.

Dangerfield: Well also to contain an illusion, a particular interpretation of it. So it’s not like you even get to see what they want you to see, you get to see the illusion they want you to see. It’s barking mad!

[49:01]

Woes: Yeah. It’s incredible! Hold on a second. Yeah, it’s this illusion. And I do think that — and I talked about this with Apollonian Germ last night, which is on BitChute, by the way — it is amazing how distant most people are, the general public, from our understanding of things. They really do believe what they see on the BBC, or on Fox News, or CNN, or Twitter, Facebook, to a great extent, still.

And it’s a shame because, you know, five years ago we really thought that we were replacing the mainstream media. And we probably were in actuality. It probably was the case. But then they joined forces with Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and then banned us! Or deplatformed us, and throttled us, and so on.

Now that’s not the end of the matter. And I don’t want it, you know, I don’t want the end of it to be this note of despair. I’m just noting that they have to put a huge amount of effort into maintaining the public’s ignorance and acquiescence.

Dangerfield: But it’s rather desperate that all they can do is try and silence us. And look at the speed that BitChute’s grown. Look at the speed that Parlor’s grown. The speed the brand new Tuba [?]. There’s all loads of others popping up. I think that the cat’s out the bag, and they can’t win that. I think it’s the desperate flailing of an empire on its last legs.

The mainstream media empire of the 20th century is literally just going:

“Shut it down! Shut them up! Just shut them up!”

And it’s not working. There’s a temporary kind of, sort of, the balance of power has gone back to them. But as these other platforms grow, I think that’s, … Look at all the surveys into the mainstream media. Faith is just going through the floor! People just don’t go for it! And that’s people now!

Zoomers, you know, come on! They’re not buying any of that nonsense. I’m absolutely confident they’re not.

Woes: I’ve managed to find this thing. And I’ll read it. And then we can maybe wrap up. It is actually quite lengthy. But I’ll go through it:

“Did you happen to catch the hearings with Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey? I thought it was fascinating. A lot of interesting points were raised. And I like doing thought experiments about this issue. Imagine if Facebook and Twitter had existed at the time of the American revolution. Could the revolution have occurred at all? I mean, if the largest disseminators of information to the populace had refused to let ideas and debates happen openly in the public square, then where would America be right now? Would Twitter and Facebook block the organizers of the Boston tea party from organizing on the grounds of inciting violence and criminal activity against the reigning British government? Would Twitter and Facebook block the likes of Benjamin Franklin time George Washington time from publishing their ideas and advancing ideas of limited governmental power and personal freedom and liberty?”

And so on, and so on. It comes out with other examples. But I think I’ll just read the last paragraph:

“I also wonder about social media companies policies on conspiracy theories. Some actually turn out to be true! Like project MK-Ultra, when the United States government, via the CIA, undertook immoral experiments on their own citizens in an effort to force confessions, and have a type of mind control of people. It’s all documented! My point is, without the freedom and ability to speak, discuss, debate, and examine, issues freely and openly we lose the ability to ever get at the truth. I feel that’s a danger in any free and open society, and people.”

Woes: So yeah, I thought that was quite an interesting post.

[53:02]

Dangerfield: But on that. And I think it’s relevant with what we’ve been talking about, YouTube and the internet. Don’t forget that the “clear net”, the Google internet, it’s only the tip of the iceberg. The internet is huge! This huge, massive, almost infinite space! And if we did get banned to that extent. If you couldn’t say anything that was vaguely controversial, or dissident, well I think we’ll be using Tor browsers.

And the day that happens, the day where we’re now going into the dark web to have our conversations, we’ll be absolutely free as a bird! I mean, I’m not into, oh what’s it called when you things all speed up and it gets worse really quickly?

Woes: Accelerationism.

Dangerfield: Yeah I’m not really into accelerationism. But, the day that people like us are on the darknet, incredible! Absolutely incredible! Because Google, YouTube, Alphabet, have got no place there! It’s not theirs! We are currently fighting this on their terms in the clear net. But once we go under that, we rule that! We’ve got the technology there, not them. They don’t! We get to chuck them out! [Woes laughs] And that’s coming! I think that’s coming.

And what a fantastic, … You talk about crypto, well that’s how I learned about crypto. Because I had to use a Tor browser to make purchases in the dark net. But people talk about these people owning the internet. They own a tiny little fraction of it. But yeah, I don’t fear that we’ll ever end up in a place where we can’t talk.

Woes: Well I hope not. I definitely hope not, because it just seems, certainly for me, it’s just become an absolutely central part of my life, even though I haven’t done it much for the last two years. The experience of being able to communicate with a very large number of people is something that’s just precious! I mean, it just changes your life really.

I mean, I know that if I get banned from YouTube — which is probably going to happen soon — I’ll still have BitChute, and I’ll still have Telegram. And I have like two and a half thousand people on there. So it’s not like that would be the end of the matter.

But still, it’s not something I’m looking forward to, to be honest, because I do — even though I don’t make much use of my channel these days — I do enjoy having it. I do enjoy the ability. And it used to be great, you know, that’s the thing. It’s now something that I treat very, very delicately. But it used to be that you could just say whatever you liked. And it was a wonderful feeling to be able to just be candid.

Dangerfield: You know, you wake up and your channel’s gone, every day!

Woes: Yeah. Yeah, definitely, exactly.

Dangerfield: Ray told me BitChute are going to have streaming, live streaming in 2021. And I went on the beta, and it’s all there set up. They’re just waiting to get it finished.

[56:00]

Woes: Oh fantastic! That’s great news!

Dangerfield: It’s all very well people saying:

“Get on Dlive! Get on Dlive!”

Dlive isn’t a free speech platform. It’s just everyone over there is under the radar. It’s not a free speech platform.

Woes: No. But it is its useful in the meantime.

Dangerfield: Sure.

Woes: But it’s definitely, I do agree with you that ultimately we need a platform that is dedicated to free speech. And that’s where we will be safe. That’s where it will be safe to speak openly. Although, as I’ve said, I’m not actually that interested in talking about these very dangerous topics anymore.

Dangerfield: So do I

Woes: Because I feel like I’ve said everything about it that I wanted to say. But yeah, it’s interesting times we’re living in. Let’s put it that way.

Dangerfield: And then look, let’s not forget, life’s always been a struggle. It’s always been a struggle for resources and power. And that’s where we are! Welcome to the world!

Woes: It’s a nice way to end. All right. Well let’s wrap it up there. So this is Chris Dangerfield. His channel is linked below, and you can get to there. And all right, you are on Telegram as well, you have a Telegram channel?

Dangerfield: I’m on Telegram, yeah. t.me/strangerfield.

Woes: Okay.

Dangerfield: I stream live twice a day, about half seven to eight. Starts about half seven, eight o’clock am English time. And then another one at four o’clock in the afternoon, English time, every day.

Woes: All right. Okay, I was muted. Okay. Well I’ll end it there. I really enjoyed this one. I’m sure that everyone else did. And okay, oh there’s one superchat, sorry! I forgot about that. Okay, this is not really connected to what we’re saying. But it’s a fifty dollar superchat!

Dangerfield: Well done! Give this man his money!

Woes: Thank you! It’s weird, Superchat seems to have died this year. I’m hardly getting any this year. Maybe it’s something that people aren’t aware that you can still do with Entropy. But anyway, here’s one:

“Any opinion on Steve Franson teaming up with Nick Fuentes? I asked Franson on Dlive if he’d be on Millenniyule this year. He was on in 2017. I think that’s the only time he’s been on. I asked him if he’d be on Millenniyule this year. He said ‘No. He was going in a different direction.’ He also said that ‘America First doesn’t need any more talent in the leadership area’, which raised my eyebrows. All the best woes.”

Well this is about very, very obviously, very much the American scene. And I honestly have completely fallen out of sync with, … I mean, in 2015 and 16 were there was a very close connection between Britain, and especially me, and the American the Alt-Right, as such. But honestly I definitely drifted apart for various reasons.

And, at this point, it’s well, Nick Fuentes in America First. I really don’t know much about them. And I don’t know much about Steve France neither. To be honest. I know that he’s on BitChute. I’ve got nothing against the guy. I watch his videos sometimes, but it just feels like, …

And this is weird to say this, because there are actually quite a lot of Americans on Millennial this year. But I really feel like we’re just operating in different arenas, because of the first amendment and the second amendment that leads to a different culture in America. Where they have different presuppositions about the way civic life is. I don’t know, there feels like there’s a big distance. And so they have a different war to fight.

Dangerfield: Sure. I think the biggest difference is our clock is ticking a lot faster than theirs, just due to the size of their nation.

Woes: Right.

Dangerfield: I can’t remember who said it, but they have — Kai Murros — they’ve got the luxury of White flight for about another 100 years. We haven’t! You run out of London, you’re in Birmingham.

Woes: Yes. Yes. It is a different thing. So do you have any comment on Steve Franson teaming up with Nick Francis? I don’t, because I’m not familiar enough with the stuff.

Dangerfield: I don’t really. I don’t really know what I make of Nick Fuentes. I think it’s probably quite a young audience. I think it serves a certain function. Actually it’s probably serving the function that we were talking about YouTube channels were in 2016. It’s probably bringing people in who aren’t too aware of what’s going on. And then they’ll move off and end up somewhere more proactive. But I don’t watch it enough to be able to help you earn that bull’s eye [chuckling].

Woes: All right, okay. Well we’ll just end it there then. Yeah, I don’t know either, so okay. Well this has been fun it’s been a lot of good points raised. So thank you for appearing on Millenniyule 2020 Dangerfield.

Woes: Thank you very much for asking me on. It’s always a pleasure.

Woes: All right. Thank you very much I’ll be back in an about an hour 45 minutes with Red Pill Germany. In the meantime, thanks for watching.

[61:38]

END

============================================

PDF Notes

* Total words = 10,056
* Total images = 5
* Total A4 pages =

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

Version History

Version 5:

Version 4: Added See Also image 2 and 4 links.

Version 3: Jan 6, 2021 — Added remaining 18 mins. Transcript now complete = 61/61 mins.

Version 2: Jan 5, 2021 — Added 13 more mins. Total transcript complete = 43/61 mins.

Version 1: Jan 5, 2021 — Published post. Total transcript complete = 30/61 mins.

BitChute – katana17

Mark Collett – Is the Covid Jab Causing Heart Attacks? – Oct 8, 2021 — Transcript

Mark Collett

Is the Covid Jab

Causing Heart Attacks?

Oct 8, 2021

Bitchute Description

TRANSCRIPT

“[Cris Croce] I mean, I still feel like I work for like an evil corporation, because it comes down to profits in the end. And I mean, I’m there to help people not to make millions and millions of dollars. So I mean, that’s the moral dilema.

[Journalist (female)] I would say billions and billions?

[Cris Croce] I’m trying to be (laughs) nice.

[Journalist] No, I hear you. I hear you, I do. I mean, I’ll still give you a hard time about it.

[Cris Croce] Basically, our organization is run on COVID money now.

[Journalist] How so?

[Cris Croce] By it netted, like over $15 billion last year.

[Male voiceover] Chris Croce is a senior associate scientist with Pfizer. He goes on to explain a test that is currently taking place at Pfizer. Not to determine the effectiveness, but to see if it is leading to heart attacks.

[Journalist] I’m glad you didn’t get any myocarditis. That’s a concern, right?

[Cris Croce] Yeah. More so for younger people.

[Journalist] Why?

[Cris Croce] That’s what we’re looking into right now.

[Journalist] Oh, cool.

[Cris Croce] So yeah, we’re doing, we just sent like 3,000 patients’ samples to get tested for … like elevated troponin levels (levels to detect heart attack) to see if it’s vaccine-based, or so …

[Journalist] What’s it look like?

[Cris Croce] I don’t know. But we just sent that over this past week – and the last batch will be sent over next week. All external testing. We’ll see, hopefully it’s good. I mean, if not then, my opinion, that might pull something from the market.”

END

BITCHUTE COMMENTS

See Also

PDF Download

Version History

Morgoth’s Review – The Morgcast 01 – Flying Solo – Mar 17, 2021 – Transcript

Morgoth’s Review

Morgcast 01

Flying Solo

Mar 17, 2021

BitChute Description

TRANSCRIPT

“Do I actually want to invest any time in this? Do I actually, do I really give a shit! Or do I really care?”

“Well, what’s the story here, you know, let’s have a look what she looks like when she’s normal and all this.”

“All right. So what’s the next news story?”

“Love, get the Twitter account up and running. And then you’re in with the club!”

“You give a shit, or you should just ignore the whole thing.”

“Men treat women like shit!”

“Men are bastards!”

“Yeah, all men are bastards! We need more laws!”

“Well it’s just all men are the problem!”

“Messenger: We are heavily influenced by who communicates information.”

“Well who is the messenger there?”

“Norms: We are strongly influenced by what others do.”

“Defaults: We go with the flow of preset options.”

“Well, you just don’t give a shit what the police are doing!”

“Affect: Our emotional associations can powerfully shape our actions.”

“We seek to be consistent with our public promises and reciprocate acts.”

“We act in ways that make us feel better about ourselves.”

“White! White! White!”

“Well, why aren’t we special? Why aren’t we included?”

“Well we want to be part of this as well. We want our protection!”

“Well you want to be included in these special groups.”

“Well this isn’t worth it!”

“We Were Never Asked!”

“Well, look, if this is what you need to do, then we’re going to have to get rid of the multicultural society!”

“Well we need to get rid of the liberal society. And then just live under this totalitarianism, this tyranny!”

“You can’t say that!”

“Now why are we not included in this? Why aren’t we getting protections?”

“Oh well, what about if you’re subverted?”

“What are you complaining about? It’s just like a rainbow flag.”

“Despite all my rage, I’m still just a rat in a cage! There’s no escape!”

END

See Also

PDF Notes

Version History

Morgoth’s Review – The Frozen North & Frozen Thinking – Feb 10, 2021 — Transcript

Morgoth’s Review

The Frozen North

&

Frozen Thinking

Feb 10, 2021

BitChute Description

TRANSCRIPT

“Well it should be like that! And we just have to work on it!”

“Well do you have a citation for that? Do you have this for that? Do you have?”