[In this 2 hour plus interview, Brizer, an Irish co-host of the Graham Hart Show, talks with Monika Schaefer about her journey towards seeking the taboo truth about WWII, the “Holocaust“, and the organized jewish perpetration of 9/11. Monika was arrested in Germany on January 3, 2018, and sentenced, and served, 10 months imprisonment for her 6 minute video that was put up on YouTube in June, 2016.

In that video she gave a heartfelt, belated apology to her mother, for blaming her generation of Germans for not doing enough to stop the alleged genocide of jews. She has since come to know that the so-called “Holocaust” is a gigantic, diabolical fraud, in that, yes jews were put into camps, yet there were no plans to exterminate jews, there were no gas chambers, and that far, far, less jews died in WWII than the “magical” number of six million.

— KATANA]

_______________________

The Graham Hart Show

Brizer with

Monika Schaefer

Dec 2018

Click the link below to listen to the audio:

http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-graham-hart-show-with-brizer_10.html

Description

The Graham Hart Show – With Brizer 2018.12.10

Brizer’s guests: Monika Schaefer

Alfred Schaefer
Stadelheim Prison
Stadelheimer Straße
81549 Munich
Germany

Graham Hart – Hoax Train.mp3

Published on Dec 10, 2018

__________________________

TRANSCRIPT

(131:00)

[00:00]

[INTRO MUSIC]

[02:05]

Brizer: Okay, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Graham Hart Show with me Brizer. I’m here on Cornwall Revolution Radio I don’t. And out of grisson dot blogspot dot com, where Mami welcomes you to the best news aggregate site on the World Wide Web! It’s good to have your company folks. Now if you’d like to join us in the Chat Room, click on the HTML 5 link on the top right hand side of the page, just below the player of your choice.

So I’ve got that one out of the way. It’s my first time doing that!

So, welcome along everybody! We have a great guest on our show tonight, which I’m really looking forward to talking to.

She needs no introduction to many of you, I’m sure. Her name, of course, is Monika Schaefer — a sister of Alfred — who was incarcerated in a German gulag for pretty much most of this year, 2018.

Thankfully she’s back in her native Canada again. And she’s still quite willing to speak out. Jail didn’t do anything to shut her up, or anything! She’s still going strong, fighting the good fight for our people, for our cause. So, without further ado, I’ll welcome Monika to the show. And Monika please give small introduction to the people who made not have heard about you. But I’m sure most people have.

Monika: Thank you so much for having me on! I am just honoured and delighted to be here! And I guess it was the better part of a year ago that Alfred was on your show, and I quite enjoyed that. And I wanted to tell you the song at the end was just fantastic, “The Goyim Know!” I sure enjoyed that! So I’m so happy to be on. And just a short introduction.

Yes, you mentioned I spent the better part of a year, that’s 10 months in the German jail in Munich. And that was just as a political prisoner! You know, I didn’t rob a bank, or hit anybody over the head with a sledgehammer, or anything like that! They didn’t like the things I talk about, and they have some pretty draconian laws there. So that’s why it landed me in prison. Did you want me to get it?

Brizer: It’s all, because of a YouTube video, I believe.

That’s, a big crime these days if it’s not got the correct message in there.

Well according to the elite was they call the correct message. Well actually, there’s nothing really bad about the video you’re just apologising to your mother.

Monika: Yes that’s right the video is called “Sorry mom, I was wrong about the ‘Holocaust’”. 02s ing and it’s just 6 minutes long and I did it in English. I also did an original version in German. And within a few days of it being released, out into the world, other people, who I had never met, or seen, or heard of before, translated into several other languages.

I think within the first four days there are already 3 more translations, like where they had to put the — what do you call it — the subtitles, I guess once, onto the English version. And it just kind of took off! It took my breath away at the time. That was June of 2016. I knew when that went out into the Internet that it was a door that I went through. I knew that I was going through a door. But heavens, I certainly did not expect all the things to happen that did happen to me! It’s been quite an education. Yeah.

Brizer: So you actually recorded that video in Germany? Is that the reason why you were nabbed. Is that it?

Monika: Well, you know, we studiously avoided answering that question, because first of all it was irrelevant where it was created, although for “the powers that should not be” over there, it was very relevant. That’s all they were interested in was the technical aspects. They were not interested in whether the contents of the various videos were accurate historically, or not. I mean, obviously that’s what bothered them, because they were exactly, you know, telling the truth about matters. But the truth hurts to those who hate the truth!

And so they basically invert everything and that’s what happened with the trial. It’s what happened with the prison time. It’s what happened with the hearings to see if I should be let out on bail awaiting the trial. They’ve basically always had a verdict first and followed with the show, whatever the show would be, whether it was a hearing itself in front of a judge, or whether it was the trial, and all of that. Everything got inverted! So just as we have everything in inverted in our world, everything gets inverted in these kinds of trials. And also the words they use to describe us and what we’re doing. So would you like me to describe what’s in the video, a little bit?

Brizer: Yes please.

See: Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust — TRANSCRIPT

Monika: Okay. It’s a short video, so this won’t take long to summarize it. But basically, I start out and finish with a little piece of fiddle music. So that’s kind of a cheerful way to have this message. Because I wanted it to be cheerful, because I was very relieved and happy to have learned the truth about my parents and ancestors.

So when I was a teenager and learning all these “terrible, horrible, evil” things that those bad Germans were doing, I was horrified! And being a very sensitive person, I was just so devastated. And I reproached my mother. She’s the person who basically I was closest with in the family home. And there I was, reproaching, and saying:

 

“Why didn’t you, and your friends, and relatives, … You should have organized! You could have organized, you could have gotten together and stopped all those things from happening!”

And I remember her listening to that, and saying:

“Well, Monika, we just didn’t know about those things, like those death camps! We just didn’t know!”

And she was very solemn, and quiet, and that’s all she said to me:

“We just did not know!”

Anyway, fast forward, many, many years, to just a few years ago, when I learned that those stories we’re false! That we’re talking about World War Two. We’re talking about “Holocaust” matters, and the gas chambers. And I started to open my eyes. Actually, first opened my eyes with relation to 9/11. But even that, it took till 10 years after 9/11 to learn about that. And then I kind of kept going down the rabbit hole, as it were, and figured out that lying was not invented in 2001! And it goes way back.

See: Organized jewry Did 9/11 — The 16th Anniversary, 2017

And so, when I learned about that these things just did not happen the way they told us they happened, I felt really bad about those reproaches when I was a teenager. I never forgot that. I never forgot how I felt! I never forgot that I had reproached my mother, my parents, but mainly my mother. And so I felt really bad about that, and I regretted it, and I wished I could talk to them about it. But they were long gone, my parents had died already. And so, I didn’t have the opportunity to talk to them. So anyway, Alfred had set up, you know, he was already making some very good educational videos.

First one was about 9/11, “Gate keepers and Controlled Opposition”. And his videos were meant to educate people about how this all happens. How we have been subjected to the psychological warfare of deception and lies. Anyway, so with that, yeah, I was able to make an apology to my parents, and to my mother, to their spirit. And that’s what I did in that video. I apologized for those reproaches.

See: London Forum – Alfred Schaefer – Psychological Warfare – TRANSCRIPT

[10:42]

Brizer: It was a nice thing to do. I mean, you realized you were wrong. But, of course, back in those days you had no idea really. Most of us had no idea about this anywhere. So, when you do figure out something like this you want to apologize to your mother, in spirit. Just say:

“I was wrong about all of this.”

The German people were not the “nasty” Germans that we all were told that they were. So, yeah, you just kind of, I suppose, made a little bit of peace with her. Something like that?

Monika: Definitely! Definitely! And not just peace with my mother and with my parents but also this notion that the German people are just “bad people”! You see, because many of us — I am really not alone in having experienced this — but many, many of us in our generation, and several generations now, of Germans, were quite ashamed to be German! And there developed this real rift between us and our ancestors. And that’s all very deliberate too. So these lies they serve many, many, purposes.

And one of these purposes is to cut us off from our ancestors, our parents, which means cutting us off from having pride in our culture, having pride in who we are as a people. And when that happens, we become like little children really. And that’s what Cicero, I think it was, has a quote to that effect that:

“If you do not know what happened before you were born, then you are reduced to being children forever.”

And so this is what has happened to us. We have a false understanding of what came before us, and, of course, a false understanding of the world as it is right now. But if you do not understand your history, and you do not have a sense of pride in your people, well that is just a recipe for annihilation, isn’t it? And, of course, we know what they have in mind with us.

You see, all these things are related, and they like to compartmentalize us anyway, with all these control words, and weaponized words. And that’s something that Alfred is really good at describing, you know, these words that trigger us to stop thinking. You know, neo-Nazi, or radical, right-wing, or “Holocaust” denier! I mean, that’s just the most weaponized term, and what does it even mean? It’s a so completely a ludicrous term! Nevertheless, this causes us to become quite compartmentalized. But also, the fact that we have this disconnect, or feel guilty about being who we are, to be German.

I heard from so many people after I created that video. I’ve heard from German people from around the world who described to me the experiences they had growing up in wherever, like Canada, Australia, the States, wherever. People are just ashamed of their heritage and hiding it! And that’s what I did. I learned very early on to hide my German heritage. I loved it at home, and we had a very beautiful traditional, very German style. And this time of year, especially, now we’re in the Advent season, and then Christmas. That was a very special time in our home. I loved it! I certainly wasn’t protesting against it at home, but outside and in school, I really learned very quickly to hide that heritage, not make any issue of being German. I mean, if somebody asked me where did my parents come from, of course, I told them. And we spoke German at home, and so occasionally if friends came over to the home, they heard us speak German with the parents, and that kind of thing. So yeah, that’s kind of how it was. [chuckling]

Brizer: Yeah, I can imagine growing up, it must have been difficult because, you had to grow up in the sixty’s time, not too long after the war, really. That memory still and that whole thing of being German, was just kind of a blot on you, or something. Is that how you would feel?

Monika: Absolutely! And anything that was on television. I mean, we didn’t even get television till, I think it was the late sixty’s. But nevertheless, then we were exposed to the television series that really made fun of the Germans, or they were always kind of the “bad guys” and then the movies, … I mean, we all know there’s just hundreds of Hollywood movies that always depict the Germans as the “bad guys”. And then this got ramped up. I mean, as we’re talking about “Holocaust” that did not even really get going until it was in the seventies. And that’s exactly when I was going through junior high and high school.

And that’s when they really got going with “Holocaust” propaganda, and there was that mini series on television called “Holocaust”. And if you watched clips of it now, it’s just so absurd and ridiculous! But, you know, in the beginning the stories that were told about how people died in the camps were not even, … They kept changing the stories! I just read an article the other day that after the, quote, unquote, “liberation of Auschwitz”. First, there was nothing in the Russian newspapers for a few days, and then finally something came up. And they talked about:

“Electrocuting the prisoners along conveyor belts.”

And that:

“They would drop dead into these pits.”

So what a different story that is from what came out later! That the “gas chamber” story came out later. And now, the tourists are now led through these museums, or through what they say are the ruins of the camps now. And these are “reconstructions” that at Auschwitz for sure. And I think most of the other places, these are “reconstructions” and the Russians have admitted to doing that after the war. And then the reconstructions of what supposedly was there are so sharply done I mean, they’re just completely careless!

[Click image to enlarge]

And I’d like to mention the late, great, Robert Faurisson who just died. I believe it was October 21st, or 22nd, just a few days before I came out of prison, he died. And he did so much good work and if anybody was always trying to be exact in his research, in his methodology, his research. I mean, there is the man himself! Like, he spent decades researching and being very meticulous with his work. And he studied the architectural plans, and he studied a lot of other things about Auschwitz. And I’m not sure what other camps as well, but my goodness his work is tremendous!

See: Alain Soral – My Homage to Robert Faurisson, Oct 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

And I would highly recommend that if people want to learn more, to just look up some of his articles that he has written over the years, about those actual camps. And just did the absurdity of making out that gas chambers, all the showers were actually gas lines and whatnot! Well there were doors, wooden doors with cracks, and the windows! And what I mean, it’s so ludicrous what they report on! And then, of course, the numbers have changed over the years. That all these things change, and change, and change, and yet the mainstream goes on to just say well:

“Yeah if you question this, then you’re a criminal! And you go to jail! You can’t question this!”

And yet jewish “Holocaust” historians, they have changed their story so many times over the years! They’ve changed their numbers, they’ve changed the methods, they’ve changed everything so much, that you have got to, even just people who haven’t looked into this issue at all, you just have to ask yourself, well at what point does one just say:

 

“Look! If this part is a lie, and that part is a lie, you know, the shrunken heads, the soap, and another part is a lie, and another part is lie, then how can it be that they have such a stranglehold on this?”

Well it’s, because it’s turned into a religion! It’s “Holocaustianity”, that if you question it then you are a heretic, basically you get burned at the stake, figuratively speaking! Thank goodness they don’t actually burn people at the stake, because then I would not be talking to you right now on this program! [chuckling] There you go.

Brizer: Yeah. It’s silly, because my aunt now she’s quite elderly, but she went to Auschwitz and she’s still brainwashed by that stuff. I brought it up gently with her once. She said she was there and she was told:

“The birds don’t sing at Auschwitz, because of all the terrible deeds that happened.”

But yet she said the trees were full of birds! She said the birds were flying all over the place. So there’s the first lie right there!

Monika: Isn’t that something. And yet, this wasn’t enough to help your aunt?

Brizer: No, not really, because she’s just brought up with that whole generation and believes the whole thing. It’s hard to break through to the people who were, …

Monika: It is!

Brizer: It’s hard! With most people it’s very hard. But I think once we break this taboo, I think this is why the jewish elite are so afraid, because we are getting to that hundred monkey situation now, where more and more people are beginning to see through the lies of the whole thing.

Monika: Absolutely!

Brizer: And, then of course, what we’re doing is, and this is why when I talk to people about this I don’t go into the details of gas chambers. I kind of go into the situation, according to the jewish, their own records, it was 3,800,000 jews in Europe before 1938.

Monika: Yes.

Brizer: And then there’s what, 15,000,000 odd, jews in the world, I think in 1938. And there was still 15,000,000 left in 1948!

Monika: That is right.

Brizer: Let’s do some mathematics here! It’s very simple. And people are kind of scratching their heads and saying:

“Oh, okay.”

But it’s still trying to break that down! I mean, the conditioning that people gone through is quite incredible! I mean, I was there myself, but somehow I got into this. I was just intrigued, I don’t know why it was with me. Like, sometimes I wonder:

“Why did I figure it out? And why can’t other people figure it out?”

I just let go of stuff, because I was going through my own issues. After losing my wife, and then fighting for my house. I’m still doing what the banks at the moment. I realized I’ve just loosed the fear. Once you let go of all of that stuff, that baggage that we carry around with us, everything opens up. And we begin to really see. We step outside the box.

[22:40]

Monika: That’s exactly right! Yeah, many, many roads lead to the same conclusions. And something you said there, a minute ago, just really rings true for me too. That I often wonder how is it that some of us are able to peel those layers, you know, peel the lid off our eyes, basically, and see. And other people who with whom we grow up together in the same condition, same environment, are not able to! And I don’t know, I don’t know what that is! If we knew we could solve all these problems.

But I also want to point out something along the lines of what you’re saying. That these jewish sources actually tell us these population figures. Jewish sources are sometimes the best sources for finding out what’s going on. And then you can also just throw it back at those who are doubting us and say:

 

“Look I got this from jewish sources.”

Like, for example, the population figures before and after the war, and how many jewish people worldwide, and whatnot. And they often talk very openly about what their plans are, and what they do, and what not. So that’s really good to use those.

And I also wanted to bring up the fact that many, many, more people do know and understand the truth, than what is visibly apparent to the outside. And the reason for that is that most people who do understand it, they realize what the consequences are of speaking publicly about it. That’s why they make an example out of people like myself and Alfred, when we do speak out publicly about these things. And also what I went through in Jasper — my hometown since 35 years — before I went to Germany, here this last December, and then only to get stuck there, on an extended “State paid vacation”. [chuckling] It was involuntary, but, …

Brizer: Government hotel! [laughing]

Monika: Yeah exactly! [chuckling] I went through what they call “ritual defamation”, in this town. And there are many purposes of that ritual defamation. And one of the purposes is to scare other people from looking into these issues. To actually learn the truth, or if they do understand the truth, to keep them silent, and thereby it gives the appearance to the average person, that there are very few of us. And then, of course, they make us look like a total nutcase and insane, or whatever.

[Click image to enlarge]

I mean, I actually had the local doctor tell me that I need to go seek psychiatric help, or be charged! And this was a couple of years ago, when he told me that. So basically, he was prescribing institutionalization for me! And that’s the local doctor, you know, and I live in a town that’s a small town, 5,000, or so. And I was already sort of known. I was in the public eye, I could say, because I wore many different hats. I had the music hat on as a local musician, I also had run politically in elections with the Green Party — that’s a whole other story! I certainly am not part of the Green Party anymore, that’s for sure! And then I also wore a public hat, I guess, as being involved on some local boards, and the culture and recreation board and some other involvements that I had.

So I was in the public eye. And visibility enhances the vulnerability to ritual defamation, right? So, if I had been a sort of an unknown entity and came out with this public proclamation — like I did in my apology to my mother — they could have quite easily just ignored me and it wouldn’t have become anything.

But, because I was in the public eye it was for them, those who do not like what we speak, those who do not like the truth, it was important for them to take me down! And boy oh boy, did they ever try hard to take me down! Now luckily, I had the confidence to know that truth lies on my side. It doesn’t mean I know everything, and I’m always open to learning more and looking at the evidence.

If somebody takes issue with anything I’m talking about, show me the evidence. Have a discussion with me. However, to generally have truth on my side when I did this, … And I didn’t do anything bad, I didn’t do anything wrong! I’m apologizing for having reproached my mother as a teenager. And that I’ve learned more about it now, and so it was quite a kind of loving thing to do really, in terms of my relationship with my parents. And yet I’m being called a “hater”! And I’m being called all kinds of other things, and they’re trying to destroy my livelihood, and all these other things that they did, and do!

But I kind of stayed upright on my feet, and they were probably surprised by that! [laughing] And it’s very threatening to them when somebody stays upright and doesn’t apologize for what they just did. Because that’s something that a lot of people will do if they’re subjected to this ritual defamation, they’ll immediately go:

“Oh I’m so sorry! I was wrong about that, and I take all that back!”

And then they go overboard in the other way, or something. [chuckling] I didn’t do that!

Brizer: Yeah it’s interesting what you’re saying, because tonight, just before I come on the show, I was at an anti-corruption meeting, hosted by this very brave journalist Geraldine O’Doughty [word unclear] who is exposing corruption at very, very high levels. In fact it’s infected everything in the public life in this country! It’s quite shocking what she had to say. And there were a few other speakers there as well. And actually one, or two of the other speakers, this guy who was a chicken farmer and he was trying to get his business going. He realized that he was working with companies who are committing absolute fraud! Getting backhanders, left, right and center. And he tried to expose it, and he brought it to the police, he brought it to the government ministers, and the whole lot, and they turned on him!

You know, they actually turned on him! Threatened to take he has, ruin his business and put his family out onto the street!

Monika: Exactly! That is what they do.

Brizer: And so it’s coming down to all levels of how we live.

Monika: Yes. And so what that tells us, is that there are some very corrupt officials at the top levels of wherever, like the police, the politicians, they have some very compromised people! That’s a better word, there are compromised people at the powerful levels.

Brizer: And they use fear as a weapon, they threaten people and that’s why you might have people within the media who, you know, again the media, as we all know, is corrupt as hell! But there’s people in there who might want to say things. And she, this lady Geraldine O’Doughty [word unclear] and another great journalist, John Waters, another great guy who, … He just got out, because it’s a complete cesspit!

You know, they just try to threaten them, and they’re standing up and saying:

“No, no, they’re going around the country, doing these talks and trying to wake people up to this kind of, … The bread and butter issues, if you will, just to see how we’ve been lied to, how we’re been deceived, how we’re being used! How they are using our tax monies against us! In every possible facet.”

And it was kind of grim to hear all that stuff. But we need to hear it, to see that really deep level of how this goes. So, as I just say, it just goes up the ladder to all different aspects of what’s going on. Our history has been rewritten more, or less. Like even here in Ireland where I am, our history it’s been kind of erased. It’s going to be taken out of school books.

Monika: Oh my!

[31:00]

Brizer: We’re all supposed to be good EU citizens now. All this kind of stuff. All the kids have been programmed with its nonsense! And a lot of “Holocaust” stuff being pushed into their history books constantly! So let’s not talk about the genocide, which was the potato famine. No, no, we’re not talk about that anymore! Let’s not talk about 1916 where a few brave man stood up against the Crown to declare our freedom for Ireland! Well, let’s not forget about all of that stuff! We’re all good EU citizens! And you just shut up and obey! And here’s your toys and our gadgets, TV and all of that.

So there you go. It’s insanity! I’m really enraged by this! And then last Thursday I was at a meeting, I spoke on this with Denis Fetcho’s show. I rang in after that meeting, that evening. A new party came out called the Irexit, which are all but trying to exit out of the EU. Of course, you’ve heard about this “Global Compact on Migration” Have you heard about this?

Monika: Yes. Yes! It’s absolutely horrifying!

Brizer: Yeah. I know Canada is fully committed to it. I know our country is fully committed to it. But the people aren’t, but their governments are, of course.

Monika: Yeah.

Brizer: So we kind of held a silent vigil. Of course, they had their Antifa groups all set up. The “rent a mob” were there calling, shouting “Nazi scum off our street!” and all this party is saying:

“We want to take control of our country again, take control of our borders, our economy, our laws. We want to take it all up back!”

And yet we were called “Nazi scum”, “fascists” all this type of stuff.

Monika: Yes, …

Brizer: And by a lot of young kids who are in university probably. Who were probably paid some beer money just to let them do that. I mean it’s just disgraceful!

Monika: Absolutely! It is, I mean, that’s the thing, if you take away people’s history, … Well, how did that same go in the 1984 movie?:

 

“If you control the past you control the future. And those who control the present control the past.”

See: House of Orwell

I mean, it is just absolutely spooky. And so they’re erasing the history from the history books, and I hear, I think it’s in some New York schools, they’re doing away with their actual physical libraries now. They’re getting rid of the physical libraries, so that it will only be virtual libraries online. Which means that they can just, at the click of a mouse, actually change these books online. Change the history. So it’s only when you have books that can last in a paper form that you can really check what’s going on in history.

I mean, when historians can look back at books that were actually printed in the previous century, in the thirty’s, forty’s, fifty’s, and see what was written in them, compared to what they’re trying to tell us now in sort of mainstream media, then you can verify it. If they’re changing it, or not. But if it’s just all online and you’re erasing, … I mean, that’s their specialty isn’t it? Like this group that we’re not supposed to name lest we be called “anti-semitic”. And they also talk about it in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, that the agents will become, sorry, the “goyim” will become agents of their own destruction!

And so with the programming that happens by all these lies and deceptions, and they’re going younger and younger into the schools to actually soften up the brains of the youngsters that is making them ill actually. Like you could say it’s causing the people to be mentally ill, because it’s just these poisonous lies!

And amongst those poisonous lies, they’re also doing this thing that they call “sex education” in the schools. But really, what I have learned, what they are teaching the children, it’s porno pushing! It’s perversion pushing! That they’re doing at a younger and younger age! It’s absolutely horrifying!

And this just softens up the brains of these youngsters that they can’t even get to first base anymore, to be able to look at something that they’re being told in the news. You know, maybe first base would be to figure out 9/11, and then second base might be to figure out something further back in our history books. And then 3rd base might be to figure out that:

 

“Gee! They want to get rid of us!” [chuckling]

These things are all connected, these lies. And, of course, the “Holocaust” is the big, sort of like a chain, a hammer, that they can use on anybody’s heads when they start talking about:

“Gee! I don’t know, we never were asked about all these people coming into our country. Like this is just kind of happening, and I don’t remember being asked about this!”

So this is what perhaps is going through the heads of the average person. And they’re feeling uncomfortable about it. But lest you think out loud about it:

 

“Oh! You’re xenophobic! The next thing, you know, you’re going to have another ‘Holocaust’!”

This is how the “Holocaust” story, or fairy tale, is being used as a hammer, especially in Germany. And, of course, that’s where you see this invasion really going crazy! But it’s in all the European countries, and it’s in other White countries as well. You have this huge invasion of what they call “migrants”, but it’s basically opportunists from all kinds of places. And they lie about where they’re coming from! And I have firsthand experience with people lying about where they’re coming from. And if you want I could tell you a little bit about that.

See: Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT

But, yeah, so that’s what we have. These things are all connected. That they use one part of the history that they’ve changed they use it as a blunt hammer to make sure you don’t question anything else. And then the children are being just prepared for the slaughter, basically.

See: Red Ice Radio Interview: Invasion of Europe — TRANSCRIPT

Brizer: Yeah, they’ll throw it in anywhere. Again, I was on another kind of march against the banks and how they are evicting people out of their homes. And one guy had a placard — one of the banks is called “AIB” — it says:

 

“AIB — Rothschild Sewer Bank!”

And the media immediately jumped on that and said:

 

“Anti-semites out marching against the banks!”

Can you believe that nonsense?

Monika: Oh!

Brizer: They just throw that in, just to push people away from that, because they don’t want to be associated with that.

Monika: Yes that word, …

Brizer: You’re probably next, your family’s next! They’re coming after us, they want to dispossess us, they want to replace us.

Monika: Exactly.

Brizer: They want to turn our countries, our beautiful White countries into third world slums! Not while I’ve got a breath of my body, they are not!

Monika: Yes, that’s exactly right! This is an existential crisis. And I feel the same as you do, that while we are still breathing, I mean, this is just the most important thing! If we do not turn this ship around then, well, we’re doomed really!

Brizer: We’re gone.

Monika: We can never give up hope. And that’s a big part of it. And that’s why I do like to talk about some of the things I learned.

After creating that video I learned that there are so many more people who are aware, and know, and have their eyes wide open, than as apparent. And I found that out, because people are writing me, and calling me, and what not, just from all around here, for starters. But then from many other places in the world. And then I realized every little hamlet, every little town, every little billet, every place, has people who are wide awake! And it’s up to us to make it easier for people to talk about it, and to, … I don’t know, I mean, we can’t sort of tell people what to do with this. Everybody has their own abilities, their own ideas, and imagination, what they can do as individuals. But everybody has to somehow do something, get involved, whether it’s little, or big!

Everybody needs to get involved in this! And the more people’s eyes we can open the better. And nobody should feel that they’re the only one. They are not! That’s what the enemy likes us to think, that we’re just isolated little cliques of people, here and there. But no! We are many! We need to repeat that again, and again, that we are many! And we need to be educating our neighbors, our friends, our family! I mean, that’s also a way to immunize ourselves from being “burned at the stake”, so to speak. Because if we have people around us who do understand, then it’s going to be harder for them to persecute those of us who do speak publicly, right?

[40:16]

Brizer: Yeah, like I mean, tonight there was the Q & A afterwards. Like, how can we do this? What can we do to turn this around? And this guy John Waters says:

 

“We have to get the conversation going. Get people talking about it.”

Also there is that fear, because people are afraid they might lose their jobs, and all this kind of stuff. And that is understandable. There’s also the friction maybe, within families, with matters like this. I know many people who have had friction within their families.

Monika: Yes. That’s right, lose your fear! That’s one of the most important things. And I’m telling you it is extremely liberating! And in spite of all the things that have happened to me, for example, I have zero regrets! I have absolutely no regrets! I never ever, you know, perhaps in the evening, just before going to sleep, say to myself:

 

“Gosh, darn! If only I hadn’t done that little video! If only I hadn’t done this, or that! That caused all these subsequent things to happen in my life!”

No! Never! Not once have I felt that way, because it is extremely liberating! That old saying:

“The truth will set you free!”

It really, really is true. So I would encourage people to lose their fear. It might mean you have some discomfort, it might mean a decrease in disposable income, it might mean a few things like that. However, the rewards are far greater! It liberates you! It is an uplifting that there’s nothing that can compare really. And while I was in jail, I felt that as well. And I wrote that in some letters to people too that, if they were concerned that I was going to be in a deep dark depression in there, or something. No! No! I said I feel a 1,000 times freer than the jail boss, for instance. I would never want to change places with the jail boss there, and I felt free, still. It was only in body that I was incarcerated, and even with that though, once I kind of found my, … I mean, in the beginning, of course, it was a shock, and it was difficult to sort of de-stress myself about my concerns about the home front. I was sort of ripped out of my life, right? Out of my normal life — whatever normal is anymore, anyway — that it had already changed so much through the ritual defamation.

But then once I kind of settled into the fact that I couldn’t do anything about it, I didn’t have the key, they had the keys. They had the power to turn the keys and dictate the routine of my day. Like okay, open the doors at 10:00, you go in the courtyard, and bring the hot meal at 11:15, and then lock the doors again, and open the doors again, for an hour and a half in the afternoon.

And so they had the control over my daily life. However, once I resigned myself to, okay, this is where I am for now, I can’t do anything about it, well, I’ll just make the best of it! And I really did! I made the best of it. And I can tell you that for the most part I was in a very good mood. And yes, and you do get to know other people there. You become very close friends with other prisoners with whom you can share a little bit of what you’re going through there. We’re all in the same boat there! One tends to be not judgmental. You take people at face value, who they are, while there. And I’m telling you, I’m not the only person there and it shouldn’t be there, like in terms of being innocent. True wrong doing, right? And you just get into, well I got into a very good rhythm and had a good routine going. And yeah, it was fine that way. I’m not saying that a voluntary place to be. I didn’t go knock on the door on January 3rd and say, :

“Hey! Do you have another room? And can I just come in? [laughing] I’d like to stay a while, and have bars across my window!”

No, it’s not like that at all. But once you’re there and you can’t do anything about it, well you make the most of it.

And I’m telling you, it was a huge education, like, I learned so much! And you could just sit back and watch things happen to, and learn about other people’s story. I’m telling you, I learned a lot of things there that, oh my goodness, what an education that was! And I would say I got stronger and grew. I grew in different ways. I learned a lot, but I grew I think in a spiritual way, as well. And yeah, I made the best of my time there, I could say.

Brizer: Now, because I do know of few other people who were incarcerated for saying the wrong thing, or doing the wrong thing, or was perceived to be the wrong thing. And they came out even stronger, they didn’t come out in repentance to the government:

“Oh I’m sorry! Oh my God!”

They were actually coming out stronger and more committed to the cause, I think. So maybe sending people to jail isn’t such a good thing!

[45:55]

Monika: [laughing] That’s exactly right!

Brizer: I think you had your music as well to help you. Were you allowed to play? I know you’re an accomplished violinist. Were you allowed to play the violin much, or what?

Monika: Well thank you for asking about that. Yes. So I was incarcerated January 3rd, and I believe it was March 22nd that I got my violin into the jail. And, of course, I had no idea how long I was going to be there, and whatnot. So I was very concerned at first that I’m going to lose my skills. I’m going to lose all those tunes I have in my head, as well. Like I play a variety of types of music so not just classical music but also a lot of fiddle tunes and a lot of those are by memory in my head. And so I made lists of the tunes, the names of them, right at the beginning I wrote down every tune name that I could remember. And then every day I would just hum the melodies to these tunes, like maybe three, or four, or five of them each day, to keep them in my head. Because I was quite worried that I would lose them because, you know, with that kind of thing if you don’t play them, you lose them. I have to have a little sip here. My throat is getting, …

Anyway, excuse me, my lawyer, who is a brilliant, brilliant, lawyer, I cannot say enough about this man who represented me! He gave a very good argument to the court. He had to, we had to get court approval for getting the violin in. And it was all his idea to do this, too. But he argued, very well, that:

 

“Look, I was there as an innocent person, because if you have not yet been charged charged and convicted then you are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty. No matter what they think of you! No matter what kind of an evil ‘Nazi’, terrible persons they label me as. I am technically still innocent until proven guilty!”

 

And he argued that as a musician, who makes her living as a musician, everybody knows that if you don’t practice your instrument, you’re going to lose your skills. Thereby I would be losing my ability to make a living!

Now, I mean, just putting aside the fact that they’ve just ripped me out of my normal life, so I don’t have my capacity to make a living now, anyway. But just putting that aside, there they are holding me, awaiting some kind of a trial, that’s at some unknown date in the future. And possibly a long sentence. You just don’t know, right? Anyway, he argued that they were already punishing me by not allowing me to have my violin with me. They were already punishing me, and I am innocent, right? So that was his argument. He made it much shorter than in my description, just now. He was very articulate and succinct. And it took a while for them to decide. But they then decided “yes”, but then it still had to go through the prison authorities. And I’m telling you, they make their own rules there, which override the court if they deem it for security reasons — that’s always the catch all phrase:

 

“Oh, for ‘security reasons’ we’re going to do this, and not the other thing.”

But anyway, they did then finally permit me to have it. And I’m telling you that really improved my life a lot! It also opened the door for me, in many ways, into other people’s hearts! [chuckling] I can say, because people enjoyed it, that I had it. It was very unusual. Long term guards there had never seen anything like that. And I got to play every Sunday in church. And so it was like a mini performance for me, a mini concert opportunity. And I practiced every day in my cell for about an hour. Like, I didn’t overdo it. I didn’t want to overdo it. Now the way the cells are there, we’re all surrounding a courtyard. So all the windows of the women’s prison, it’s a sort of a small prison there for the women. Next door is the men’s prison, the much older Stadelheim, which is where Alfred is right now. And it’s huge!

But the women’s prison, it’s quite new there, that they made next door. And we all face into the courtyard. And so the windows all face into the courtyard. Now, in the first few days that I had my violin, I was just so excited about this, I noticed that when I played and my window was cracked [open] a bit, suddenly I saw all these other heads at other windows, like heads and shoulders. You could see them all coming to the other windows, and I realized:

 

“Oh! They could hear me!”

And so, then I just opened the window really wide, like not just cracked [open] but just opened it wide and stood in front of the window and played into the courtyard! [laughing] And we had a bit of a, sort of a, quote, unquote, “party” for a few minutes! People were just loving it and applauding it!

Of course, it’s illegal there to talk even, from one cell to another, through the windows. So this was really, we were breaking all the rules! And then there was one woman who got all excited, and she didn’t like it at all, and she screamed at me, and said:

 

“Close your window if you’re going to practice that thing!”

And so I guess, maybe she was traumatized once by somebody who played the violin! I don’t know. And then the others all shouted back at her:

“No! No! We want more!”

And it was really quite funny! Anyway, I did that for a few days in a row, just for a few minutes each day where I had it wide open like that. Do a little little concert into the courtyard.

But then all that ended when a guard caught us. I didn’t realize there was a guard in one of the windows. I hadn’t seen her. And then she was jotting down everybody that she could see that was shouting, or applauding through the windows, because that was highly “verboten” [forbidden]. And then they stormed my room and locked my windows shut for a few days! Like that was my punishment! And I got called to the jail boss’s office. And got the little “disciplinary action”! And it was really quite, … It was worth it anyway to have had that little bit of fun, like this joviality. And I didn’t care about the little bit of disciplinary action, it was all worth it. We had our fun.

[52:23]

And then, they didn’t take away the violin, thank goodness, that would have been the worst. But they also realized that the world was watching and paying attention. Because I did get a lot of mail. And that was a godsend for me! Because they probably would have treated me more strictly had I not been receiving all that mail, because they would have just thought they could get away with things. But there were other things that happened there, whereby I knew that the fact that I was getting all this mail was helping me a lot! Because they understood and realized that the world is watching. So anyway, they didn’t take away my violin, they let me have it, but they said:

 

“Oh you have to always have your windows closed when you’re practicing.”

But after about a month, I started to crack it open again a little bit, but nobody was applauding any more openly through the window. But I got a lot of positive feedback at the courtyard hour. People were really enjoying it. They would close their eyes and dream for a moment that they were somewhere else, that they weren’t in prison, that they were in a normal place. And so I got a lot of that kind of feedback, you know, I mean, it could be hardened criminals that are telling me that! [chuckling] And it was very nice for me to have that extra little thing that made my life a little bit more like “normal”. And also that I could keep up my skills, because really, I mean, if I had gone 10 months without having my violin it would’ve taken a lot of work to get back into it. And it just provided a little bit of enjoyment for not just me, but for others. So I was very grateful for that.

Brizer: And it’s kind of, when you think of it, it’s these small little things that you’re stuck in there on your own, you don’t really know anybody, and you’re able to get your violin which you can play and you can cheer yourself up, and the people up, and probably even a prison guards up. You know what I mean?

Monika: Yes!

Brizer: Just little small things like that can always make a difference. And also it just kept you kind of sane in many ways, because this is the love of your life, the music.

Monika: Absolutely!

Brizer: It just keeps keeps you’re kind of, you know, … Because you could easily sink into a deep depression and all the rest of it, couldn’t you?

Monika: Yeah, I think you could. I mean, I had many things going for me that would prevent me from sinking into any kind of depression. Like I said I was in a good mood most of the time. So the violin was definitely one of those things. And the letters were another of those things that really were a lifeline for me! And with that I would like to encourage people to write letters to political prisoners and Alfred, my brother, he’s in Stadelheim jail — I’m sure that you will probably put his address into the description, or something. But sometimes people say they don’t know what to write, and they are afraid to write because they don’t know what to write.

But, you don’t have to write anything that is controversial, or political. In fact, it’s probably just as well if you don’t, but it’s the support, it’s the encouragement. You could just write about your pet dog, [chuckling] or a funny story, or whatever! It just doesn’t matter what you write, but the fact that you’re writing something. It could just be two lines, and it’s very encouraging for the person in the prison, and it also shows “them”, you know, the staff, the guards, and the court, and whatnot, it shows them, this person has not been forgotten, they’re not alone. And, that is a really good thing, if the they are shown that we are watching what’s going on, and we are many! That does help a lot.

For example, I’ll just give you a little story too while I was in prison there with the mail. Like, when you are still awaiting trial, all the mail goes through the court. They read it and they might photocopy letters that they deem they want to use as evidence, and all this stuff, and whatnot. But they read it and they send it on to the jail, and then the jail people check it for inserts, or if anything has been smuggled in, or whatever. So they check it again.

Now, if it goes through the courts it’s supposed to be opened in front of us, and I realized after a while, and I learned from other prisoners what the rules were on that. And they’re supposed to open these big brown envelopes in front of us! To do the final check for smuggled goods, or inserts. But mine were all opened already. And so the mail room in the basement downstairs, they were already opening mine and they were doing another check in front of my eyes. But that was like the 3rd check now through my mail. So I was getting extra special treatment there, in terms of having my letters controlled. So I called a meeting with the jail boss on this. I requested a meeting, and I had a meeting. And I brought this up and I said:

“This is against the law! You should be opening in front of my eyes in the office here.”

And she said:

 

“Oh no, in some special cases we open it already, in advance, you know, it’s a special case.”

So I said:

“What do you mean? Why special?”

“Oh, you know, for the safety and security of the institution.”

 

And, because I was challenging her on the legality of it. And she pulled a binder off the shelf and showed, you know, “safety and security” and all that stuff. That catch-all phrase, right? That they use when they want to do things against us and keeping things secret. It’s always that catch-all phrase:

 

“Oh, for security reasons! We can’t tell you this and we can’t tell you that. And we can do this, and we can do that.”

Anyway, so I said:

“Oh! Okay, well why? What’s this going to help?”

“Well in case you’re making plans! Maybe you’re making a gang here, or gathering followers, or whatever.”

I said:

“Oh, that means you’re reading my outgoing mail? I am sealing those envelopes to the court and sending them direct there. But you’re reading those too?”

“Oh no, just the incoming mail.”

“So, how are you going to find out about my plans, and my gang members, or whatever?” [chuckling]

And she says:

“Well they might be responding to your letter and saying, ‘Oh yes! Good plan! Good plan!”

Something like that. And I just burst out laughing at that point, because it was just getting more and more ludicrous. And then at some point I just said:

 

“You know, if you’re so worried about my conversations that I’m having here with other prisoners, then really you should be putting me into isolation, like into solitary confinement.”

I just said that right to her face. And she did not blink an eye, and she said:

 

“That’s the next step!”

And I did not blink an eye either, and I said to her:

“The world is watching!”

[chuckling] And that was about the end of that meeting with her. And I stood up and left. But I was very proud, and confident, and I think she was probably purple in the face, by then. She did not like me at all, the jail boss! Thank goodness I didn’t have very many interactions with her, or didn’t have to deal with her on a day-to-day basis. That was the big boss. But it was really true, that she knew that the world was watching! She knew I was right about that. And I think that give me a degree of safety. Because, I mean, it was a little bit uppity of me to say to her:

“You really you should be putting me into solitary, if you’re so worried about things I’m talking about here.”

And I just felt I could just get away with it! And I did. And they didn’t put me into solitary confinement, no way!

So I told you that she didn’t like me very much, I knew that. But, the guards, I have to tell you that from the beginning to the end there was a real transformation in how I was being treated in that jail. When I left and, of course, for months prior to leaving, I was being treated very well, with respect. I mean, they’re doing their job okay, they have to do their job and all that.

So they are strict and it’s not like they’re giving me special favors. But they treated me well. And in the beginning it was not like that. I was the “Nazi” coming in, and this is in “reeducated” Germany, where they’re all indoctrinated and programmed. And here I am, the “Nazi” coming in. And so I got kind of “extra special” treatment in the beginning, and I’m putting that in quotation marks. They really try to humiliate and degrade you in all kinds of ways.

And I think other prisoners also receive that kind of humiliating treatment, but they kind of loaded an extra dose of that on for me. And I know that for sure, because there were certain guards that, they just, … Oh my goodness! They just couldn’t stand that “Nazi”! And they gave me sometimes an earful.

Anyway, so that was an interesting transformation that took place through the course of time. And I think, because they saw that I was just a normal human being, and I was polite with them, and just tried to be friendly and normal. And they also can see that I’m in a pretty good mood most of the time. I’m getting along with other prisoners. I’m not creating strife, or conflict. And, in fact, sometimes I would mediate between people to try to smooth things out, that kind of thing. I mean, yeah it’s just life in prison, and I’m telling you, by the time I left I was being treated very well.

[62:01]

Brizer: Right. We’re just on the hour mark, or just over it. We can take a musical break, but before just that, Monika, I sent you a card ages ago. I don’t know if you remember, you probably got hundreds of them, but again it was just a simple message just saying I was thinking about you and praying for you and wishing you all the best. You know, that’s all you have to write.

I have a Christmas card here at home which I’m going to be sending off to Alfred. And I would urge everybody who is listening tonight to send Alfred a Christmas card! It’s that time of year. And I’ll just give out the address here, but we’ll put it in the show notes afterwards. It’s:

Alfred Schaefer.
Stadelheim Prison.
Stadelheimer Straße.
81549 Munich.
Germany.

So that’ll cheer him up no end. Just send loads of Christmas cards to him and just wish him a Merry Christmas, that’s all. You don’t have to say anything else. That will just cheer him up no end, I’m sure.

As you said Monika, it helped you big time, and I’m sure it’s going to help him. And we have to give him the support now because he’s there, where you were. We should keep him in our thoughts this time of year. It’s not going to be nice to be stuck in a prison at this time year, either.

Monika: That is for sure!

Brizer: So let’s do that guys, just get the cards out, it’s a simple thing to do. And it just makes a huge difference.

So, I’ll tell you what we’ll do, we’re going to play a song. I’m sure you might have heard of Monika, her name is Loreena McKennitt. She’s Canadian.

Monika: Oh yes! Love her music.

Brizer: I particularly like this song that I think she wrote when she came to Ireland. She connected with her Irish roots. And it’s called “The Old Ways”. And really, when you think about it, the old ways, okay, they weren’t perfect but they were a lot better than they are now, that’s for sure! And we can learn a lot from it. So we’re play this song, it goes on for about 5 minutes, so Monika, if you want to get a glass of water, or tea, or coffee, whatever. We’ll be back in 5 minutes folks and we’ll continue with this great conversation! So stick with us.

[64:19]

Okay, welcome back everybody! A beautiful song there by Loreena McKennitt, called “The Old Ways”.

That is the kind of music that just drives me on! Sometimes when you feel a bit down about all the stuff that’s ing on, the madness that is ing on in this world you just kind of go back to the old ways, think about our ancestors and what sacrifices they made. We’ve got to carry the torch forward, it’s as simple as that!

We have a special guest tonight, Monika Schaefer. We had a great first hour talking about her experiences. Welcome back Monika!

Monika: Thank you!

Brizer: Right, let’s go into the actual trial that yourself and Alfred went through, because I was reading a lot of this as it was going on. I never saw such a kangaroo court in all my life! An unbelievable nonsense! And I know a lot about law, because I’ve been going through my own situation regards the banks. And I see the lies and the deception, the corruption that is going on in there.

But in Germany it just seems to be a lot worse, from what I can see. I was shaking my head of disbelief. So anyway did you want to just kind of just go back to when it all started? So you were in prison at the time, but then Alfred was speaking out. You take it from there, Monika.

Monika: Okay. Yeah I’ll take it from there then. Yes, one day short of the 6 month deadline that they have, for how long they can hold a prisoner before trial begins — 6 months in Germany — one day before that, the trial began, July second. Now they would have just renewed that. It wouldn’t have been a problem for them, because I did meet other prisoners that were there a lot longer than I was without trial. So the things that go on in the prisons in Germany are just something that is unbelievable! I was shocked to learn that! Anyway it did start on July second. At first they had scheduled four days, then they scheduled seven days for the trial. But they just wanted to get it over with and done! And, you know, wipe their hands clean of it. They already had the verdict, of course, we know that. This was just for show, now. I mean, they made their verdict a long time ago, and now they need to to, … Because they still have laws, and it’s not quite overtly a dictatorship, but it certainly is covertly, one!

And yeah, that was the first time that I had seen Alfred in the 6 months. And it was a very joyous and jovial, very wonderful meeting. But what had been unexpected for me when I walked into that door — of course I was escorted there handcuffed to the guard — suddenly I am confronted with all these cameras! And I hadn’t even considered that would happen. But it’s just like in the news that you watch on television, where somebody goes through this throng of reporters, and all the cameras are blitzing away! And this is quite a surprise to me. And the door where I came in, that’s where Alfred was sitting, and he didn’t see me first, because his back was to me. And I just tapped him on the shoulder and he jumps up and out of his chair! And we have a big hug, and then he turns towards the cameras and he’s just giving them the whole spiel, like:

“Yeah! The lies are going down! And we’re winning!”

[laughing] It was really great! [laughing] Anyway it was quite the moment! It was such an adrenaline rush for me. Perhaps, because I just didn’t know what to expect. And, of course, having sat in jail for 6 months and then here is my first court day, you’re a little bit nervous going into that situation! Anyway, I could couldn’t even move my mouth, or my tongue, because everything had just became dry, I think it was a reaction as an adrenaline rush, reaction, or something. [laughing]

Anyway the camera people had to leave, because there were no cameras for the trial. So okay, got lead to my seat, this commotion all settled down then. And then there was the story of the water. Like, I needed water desperately, because like I said, I couldn’t even move my mouth! So if somebody had asked me a question, to even just answer my name, I wouldn’t even have been able to at that point. It was just completely, I was kind of paralyzed [chuckling] And we couldn’t get water. No, it was not permitted! No you can’t have water here! So you have to have a recess. Okay, well let’s have a recess and get water now! [laughing] I mean, this is the first half day, or the first day was such a show!

Then there was the issue of the microphones! There was a beautiful microphone system, all of us had one in front of us. Like each judge, the prosecutor, the lawyers, Alfred and I, we each had a microphone in front of us. But the system wasn’t turned on. And we were trying to have them turn it on! And the judge just dismissed that. He says:

 

“No, no. We don’t need it. We can all hear each other.”

But people from the gallery, the public gallery, were kind of shouting out that they couldn’t hear. And the judge got really angry at them for even opening their mouths. And he would just shout back at them, and say:

“You have nothing to say! It is not for you to speak. Keep your mouth closed! You’re not to open your mouths!”

He was really angry at them. And he was dismissing us about the microphones:

“We just don’t need them!”

He brushed it aside.

[70:30]

Anyway, this went on for some time, and then I just stood up out of my chair and kind of spoke out of turn. But I just couldn’t believe this was going on. And I just stood up and said:

“Look, either this is a public trial, or it is not a public trial! If the public cannot hear, then they really are there just for show. And then what Alfred has been saying is true!”

And, of course, Alfred was calling it a Muppet Show, and he was also calling it an “inquisition”. And he had done some other things, like he didn’t stand up for the judge when the judge walked in. That was very very, you know, going against the rules, and the judge was trying to get him to stand up. And the judge just didn’t know what to do with all this. But when I said that about either this is a public trial, or this is not a public trial, and if the public cannot hear, then they are just there for show, and then it really is a Muppet Show. Then Alfred is correct in what he has been describing this as!

And he still didn’t budge! Finally in exasperation I just muttered something about:

 

“Oh! My hearing isn’t so good anymore. I can’t hear.”

And that caught his attention! And I didn’t even, really say that very loudly. I just kind of muttered it, as I was frustrated. And suddenly though, his ears pricked up. He said:

“You can’t hear?”

I said:

“No. No, I can’t hear.”

And that’s when he got the technician in, and it took all of one, or two minutes to get this system turned on, and then we had microphones. But I’m telling you that was not at the beginning, that was halfway through the day, after we had a few recesses in this and that.

Now this this, what Alfred was doing there, that landed him in jail, that day. So he was held in detention. Actually, I think he was held in a police cell that night. And he came out the next morning on bail and certain conditions. Like, he had to give up his passport and show up at the police a couple times a week, or something like that. And then he was free again that week to travel back to his home each night. But the trial went for four days in a row there, the first week. And they went back to his home on Friday and picked him up, and arrested him. And he has been in jail ever since. And I did not know that until the following week. Then we didn’t have trial days til the following Thursday. And we’re all sitting there at 10 in the morning, or 9:30 in the morning and there’s no Alfred! And I’m looking around wondering what’s going on. And somebody is muttering something about the transport from the jail. And I’m just thinking:

“What is going on?”

And my lawyer looks me says:

“You don’t know?”

And I said:

“Know what?”

And he said:

 

“He’s in jail.”

And I just about fell off my chair! I did not know that he had been in jail already for 6 days, at that point. Right next door to me, basically. And I was just devastated! I was shocked that there he was incarcerated now.

Brizer: Was he held in contempt of court?

Monika: No, not at that point, okay. So the first night that he was held in detention it was, because of the behavior in court. I guess “contempt of court”. Thank you for that word, yes. After that they found a reason to put him away. And, of course, they couldn’t stand the fact that he kept talking to the world, you know, he wasn’t shutting up. And they found some reason and they said, called it [words unclear], which means to darken, which means, hiding evidence, which is completely ridiculous, because Alfred is doing quite the opposite, he’s exposing things, he’s telling things, he’s talking, he’s not hiding any evidence of anything!

[74:36]

And the other reason, I guess, they put was “flight risk”. And I mean, that was also ludicrous. It was clear that Alfred was very interested in attending court and being there for this inquisition. And basically giving them a big education and bringing them to the, well “plausible deniability”. That’s the term that he used a lot. They were going to be at the point of no return, that they could no longer use “plausible deniability”, as in, they didn’t understand it, or they didn’t know what was going on. I mean, that’s what the trial then was all about. But in the first week it was really quite tumultuous and wild. There were two other people besides Alfred who were thrown in jail. Sylvia Stolz that was thrown in jail for two days, for, in German [words unclear] which means, like, what did you say the word you used there?

Brizer: Contempt of court.

Monika: Yes, contempt of court. But she’s just said a word, at the end of the day, after court was already dismissed, but the judge heard her and didn’t like it. She just said:

“This is terror!”

When he had jailed Alfred. And she just said it very quietly, she’s a very soft spoken woman, but powerful! My goodness!

And she said that and the judge “woof” he just, you know, his ears pricked up and he and he threw in jail for to days for that. And then on day four, there was a fellow who had been attending all week, and he was thrown in jail and hauled off for four days. For something that he had said to the prosecutor outside of the court room. So again, not during court proceedings, but outside of the courtroom in the hallway. And he had said something to the prosecutor about:

 

“That he hoped that she would see the inside of a jail at some point.”

He just started out saying “shame!” you know, “shame on you!” hoping that she would see the inside of a jail. And then they fabricated more that he did not say. And there were witnesses around, but those fabrications stuck. And they were a little bit stronger than what I just told you and I’m not going to repeat them. Because, you know, you repeat fabrications and suddenly they become true. And they weren’t. So anyway, they have to lie even in things like that! So they threw him away for four days. And it was interesting when they were doing this, he stood up and said — just out of concern — he said:

“Okay, what’s going to happen with my car?”

Because obviously he was worried that his car was going to get hauled off somewhere, it was parked somewhere where it shouldn’t be parked for four days. The judge at that point lost his temper, and he just started screaming at this guy! It was unbelievable! Screaming at him:

 

“I don’t care what happens to your car! I just don’t want to see you! Get over here! I don’t care what’s going to happen! I don’t care what’s going out to you!”

And he just went off the rails there. And, in fact, the female judge beside him, she put her hand on his arm and trying to pull him down from his elevated state,

Brizer: Calm him down a bit.

Monika: Calm him down. And that happened several more times during the course of the trial. That she had to kind of bring him down a little bit from his state. And she could see that he was doing things that were not good, that were mistakes on their part. And she would kind of touch him, put her hand on his arm. And then they recessed. And he even said that, :

“Yeah, we’re going to have to bring this down a little bit. We’re going to have a 20 minute recess.”

Or whatever it was, to recompose, and come back. So the first week was just wild actually!

Now I could go into more details about what took place there, but I’ll just tell you what basically transpired during the trial, and then we can talk about some of the details.

At first, like I say, they wanted it to be over and done with very quickly. Why and how they thought it was going happen, is that they were going to just show little snippets, little clips, like a 30 second clip from this video and maybe a minute from that video. All the offending bits, the bits that they had outlined in the charges against Alfred and me.

Now for my part, that six minute video was so short, they were just going to show that whole thing, when it came time for that. But with Alfred’s videos as, you know, he has made quite a few educational videos. Some of them are one hour long, some of them are half an hour long. And there are a number of them. Now they picked little snippets and said:

 

“This is bad! This is bad! This is bad! You go to jail!”

Okay. Well, he had a brilliant strategy to force them to show the entire video so that they would be shown in context. And basically he did that by not answering certain questions that the judge was asking him, wanting to nail him, right away in that first week. They just wanted to nail him. Okay:

 

“You produced this there, and that time, and there you pushed a button and sent it out to the internet.”

Well, he just didn’t answer certain questions, the technical questions about where, and when, and how, and who, he produced this and put it on the Internet. Because those things then would just be enough for them to nail him! Because it’s against the law, and that’s it! :

 

“Ba-ta-boom ba-ta-bing! Off you go! And we’ll throw away the key while we’re at it!”

You know, that kind of thing. So finally the exasperated judge — they could see that they were losing this battle — they decided:

“Yes okay, we’re going to see the videos in their entirety.”

So then a lot more days were ultimately scheduled in for the trial. And it went on till late October. It was supposed to be over in July, right! But anyway. [laughing]

[80:44]

Basically that was huge chunk of time to see these videos. And if they were in English then the translator they had to give a translation, and the lawyers insisted that this be done properly. That they write the translations out so that it’s not just sort of simultaneous translation while the video was being shown. Because then you lose a lot. So they had to do that, like their homework. They had to translate these videos and then they would read the translations after the video was shown. And then there’d be question, answer, and discussion, and that kind of thing.

And it was a huge education! Alfred’s whole strategy here was to make sure that not a single person could sit through that trial and not understand what is really going on in the world. They could not at some later point in time, when this regime has collapsed, and fallen. And if they find themselves on trial, that they would say:

“Oh we just didn’t understand it! We just didn’t know we’re just, you know, going with our understanding and following orders!”

Brizer: Instead of the truth is no defense, lies is no defense.

Monika: There you go!

Brizer: That is the way to look at it. They are lying through their teeth and they know it! And they are getting away with it. That is where we come in to call them out on their lies. And we keep calling them out, call them out, call them out!

Monika: Exactly! Exactly!

Brizer: These people have been getting away with too much, for too long. I’ve had enough of them, and I’m sick of it! I’m sick of what they’re doing to my country! I’m sick of the doings of European countries! To our people! This is wrong! These lies have to come to the top and they will be exposed at some point, and it is getting there. We just have to stay strong and don’t give in.

Monika: Well, their means of upholding these lies are getting more and more extreme, so that it becomes more, and more, obvious that they are just upholding lies! That’s the thing, they’re kind of falling flat on their faces, because of the means that they use to keep these lies going.

Brizer: We will remember them Monika, we will remember those days and we will come to them and say:

“Right! We hold you accountable!”

Monika: Exactly.

Brizer:

“Now you’re going to prison, we’re going to throw away the key! You’re going to be on the other side of it!”

Monika: That’s right.

Brizer: And we’re definitely going to throw away the key this time. Because you people shouldn’t be out there! And don’t be coming go out with these excuses that:

“We didn’t know!”

Yes you did! You knew exactly what you were doing.

Monika: Of course, they know it. Absolutely they know it.

Yeah, I mean, they didn’t allow us to put evidence forth. Any of the motions for evidence, or requests for proof, that our side put forth, like Alfred, or his lawyer, or my lawyer, or myself, they rejected it. For example, if we wanted to have a historian, an historical expert to verify that what Alfred was reading out in these statements that he read out, like longish papers. That these are actually true, that these are real quotes.

For example, from jews who have said this is not about us. That they want to get rid of the White race, just simple things like that. Just minor details, okay, but that these are not just made up. We were not just making these things up. And an historical expert could come in and verify that these things were actually said by those people, the way that Alfred is putting it, either in his video, or in his statements that he was submitting. No! That was all rejected! All rejected!

And I’ll tell you about one specific witness who they weren’t even going to have, but he had to be called be due to exposing the fact that this witness had written a big long letter to the judge and they were hiding this from us! So, this man’s name is Gerd Ittner. You have probably heard of him, and many of your listeners may have heard of him, because he has been a political prisoner in the, what they call the BRD, Germany, for years. He’s out now, but again, he was in jail again for 6 months, or so just recently.

See: Entschuldigung Mama, ich hatte Unrecht was den Holocaust betrifft — TRANSCRIPT

Anyway, he originally was going to be called as a witness for this trial, the Schaefer Trial, then he was called off as a witness. Nobody explained why he was called off as a witness. But we think it’s because he’s in an “inconvenient” witness. And in the meantime he was in jail, and he wrote a very long letter to the judge. And it was because of our trial that he was going to be, how do you call it, [word unclear], like he was going to be taking, “lightening our load”, so to speak. I don’t know exactly the words to use. For example, one of the charges against me included the fact that in the video, “Dissidents Speak Out” which is an interview between Alfred and Gerd Ittner, they attached my 6 minute video at the end of that one, the German version. Because the German version was eliminated from the Internet in Germany very quickly. And Gerd Ittner had liked that video, and he decided he was going to give it more airtime, and put it on.

See: Alfred Schaefer – A Dissident Speaking Out – Gerhard Ittner — TRANSCRIPT

Anyway, so they charged me for that, because they said:

“Oh, in collusion with Gerd Ittner.”

And he was arguing that I didn’t even know. And that is true! I didn’t even know until after they did it, right? So it’s kind of like if you teach somebody the skills of building a fire and then they go down the street the next week and they light somebody’s house on fire, and now they charge you, because you taught them how to build a fire, like a bonfire in the backyard! It was just crazy logic!

And so, that plus he was also going to talk about the fact that the video interview that he did with Alfred, it was his inspiration, his talking, telling Alfred his own story, that inspired Alfred to go on and do all these videos. And then causing Alfred to be indicted now. So he was going to try to lighten that load, and take take the blame himself, right? And the judges didn’t let us know. But this was sent to the judges and they were hiding evidence. And they didn’t even share it with our lawyers, which is completely illegal!

But our lawyers caught wind of this long letter, and they brought it up. And suddenly the one judge turns red, purple in the face, and the other one goes White! They each had their physical reactions to this, because they knew that they really blew it! And suddenly he’s called in, yeah! I’m serious! [laughing] suddenly Gerd Ittner got called in for the following court day. Which was the Monday. And this was on a Friday.

Anyway, I’ll go back a little bit to just how they give a verdict first and then create their story. Going back, before the trial, when they were giving me hearings to determine if I was to still continue staying on in jail awaiting trial, or if they would let me out to go to my brother’s place, sort of in a form of house arrest. And this happened twice, that I went before a judge during that 6 month period, once in March and once, I believe it was, in May. And I guess that’s part of the rules, every so often you have got to have a hearing. But they weren’t going to let me out. There’s no way!

But at the first hearing there was some hope that I would get out. In fact, the judge in that case seemed very sympathetic, and she was talking about how I’d only have to go maybe twice a week to the police station to present myself. Whereas my lawyer was saying:

 

“I should go every day.”

And she’d said:

“Twice a week would be enough.”

So it really was going towards this notion that I would be let out, but not to go away from Germany, but to await trial. And at that point we had no idea when the trial was. I didn’t even have my charges yet, until late April. And this was in March.

Anyway, she said:

 

“Okay, well I’ll let, you know, tomorrow by fax what the result is.”

Everybody there thought that I was getting out. Even the guard that accompanied me, she was very nice, and said:

“Well, one more night in the jail, it’s not so bad with us, is it?”

She was being friendly. And the next day no news, and the day after that I kind of knew in my heart that I was getting out. And I had kind of a rough day that day because I started to get my hopes up! Then kind of crashed then. And then the day after that, I put the pictures back on the wall, because I had packed everything. Because, if you do get let out, you can’t go back in the cell. And then by Monday, or Tuesday, finally the reply came. And by then, I knew anyway. But the reply was “No!” And then they have to give reasons.

[90:10]

And one of the reasons was a complete fabrication! It was a complete lie! They said that something about my “active letter writing”. My letter correspondence with Gerd Ittner. Now I had not had a single letter from him, which also meant I had not written a single letter to him, because I wouldn’t have had an address, anyway. But not one letter went between us!

And they’re using this is one of the reasons like, oh, by the way, the judge why she said she would give the answer the next day, because she had to still talk to the prosecutor. And that’s what did it. The prosecutor gave her a bunch of lies, and one of these lies was that I had this active letter writing correspondence with Gerd Ittner. And this was a dangerous thing, I guess. I don’t know how they justified still keeping me in. Maybe they just didn’t want me to communicate with him and this is preventative, rather than reactive.

But there you go, it was a complete and utter lie! And that’s how it changed from giving me all indications that they were going to let me out to:

“No, you’re staying in.”

Right? So they give the verdict first, and then they make up the story. And so that was a hearing back in March. But fast forward to the trial, Gerd Ittner comes in. Then it didn’t work out in the end, because the judge was very impatient with him. And while he indicated that he wants to testify as a witness, but first he wanted to clarify this identity problem with him. Because they have him in there with the wrong name. But the judge was very impatient. Now the judge could have handled that differently and just said:

“Look okay, are you the person that appears in that video?”

And then he would have just said:

“Yes that is me.”

But anyway, that’s neither here, nor there.

The important part they were going to avoid him, because he was an “inconvenient” witness.

And I’ll tell you a little bit of an aside here, about another trial that was going on at the same time. But it had been going on for 5 years, and it finished up, I believe, it was in August that it finished up. And that was another trial which Gerd Ittner was supposed to be a witness too, but they kept him out of it, because they only want witnesses that are “convenient” to their side a story, and not the “inconvenient” witnesses, the ones who tell the truth and actually do have knowledge of what transpired. And that is the NSU. Did I tell you about that already in the first hour, I don’t think so?

Brizer: No you didn’t, no.

Monika: The NSU, that’s stands for the National Socialist Underground. And this is a very interesting story, because it tells you how these operations happen, and a little bit about, you know, deception coming from the government agencies, and whatnot, or the spy agencies. So the National Socialist Underground, it was basically a terrorist organization. And there was a woman in jail there with me that I got to know a little bit. And she has now been given a verdict of life! Life in prison! And like I say this trial that went on for about 5 years and, of course, the whole time she’s in prison, and I think she was in prison already before that. And maybe 300 court days, and very, very, many witnesses. Okay. So that wrapped up.

And I’ll just tell you in summary here a little bit about that, and it just knocks your socks off! Over 50 witnesses, or over 50 people, sorry, over 50 people it was revealed that they had been paid agents. So they’re called [words unclear] is the letter V. And that stands for [word unclear] And these are like, it’s like a secret agency type of thing, you know, to protect the Constitution type of agency in Germany. But this is a constitution built on a country that’s built on lies! And it’s not even a sovereign country, so the whole thing is just a criminal regime!

So there were over 50 people who were involved in this NSU. Some of whom became really good friends with this woman that I got to know, who was now a “fall” person. She was like one of the real people who was not a paid agent, but she was pulled into this organization. Now they could never prove her presence at any of these actual bombings, and actual events where people died. They actually could never prove her presence, but just from all the other surrounding, circumstantial evidence, and whatnot, they have convicted her to life in prison.

And get this, 120 years is how long they have locked the files away! So in 120 years if somebody wants to access them through Freedom of Information, or whatever rules they have at that time. Yeah, several generations later, they can access these files! Now what does that tell you?

Brizer: There’s something big to hide there!

Monika: Absolutely! So what they do is they create a story, and then, you know, they create the problem and then they create the solution. So the problem in this case was this organization was terrorizing immigrants okay, so well, these migrants, or invaders, as Alfred calls them. And that’s how they should be called, because they are being invited in by people who want to demolish us, and replace us, and destroyed us! And he’s their opportunists, and quite often they’re criminals themselves that, you know, maybe they’ve emptied their jails in some of these countries. Where they’ve just let them loose on our countries. And so, some of the people did die. There were some families that died and whatnot. And now this NSU, so National Socialists Underground, this is neo-Nazis, and there are all painted with this brush of being this, you know, they’re Nazis, they’re neo-Nazis! Oh my goodness, they’re radical right wing people!

And now all the people who are talking, raising their voices in concern about immigration policies, or about how we’ve been lied to about World War Two, are we being lied to about some of these other events going on now? We’re all painted with the same brush, all of these radical right wing people. And look at them, they’re violent, they kill people, and they’re awful! And then the general public, they don’t know what to make of this. And that’s how it goes, they create the problem, and they create the solution. Create a police state, more and more. And if anybody speaks out against all these people coming in, they scream “racism”, or they scream about xenophobia! They use all these weaponized words against us!

Brizer: Yes. And now that’s becoming a criminal act by voicing your opinion.

Monika: Exactly.

Brizer: And that is why all these “hate speech” laws are being pushed in all these countries. That’s what they’re going for now, because people are beginning to talk about it.

Monika: Exactly.

Brizer: The conversation has begun, and it’s getting bigger, and it’s getting bigger. So they have to shut that down. And the way to shut it down is just label people “neo-Nazis”, “fascists”, whatever. Whatever they want. But the way I look at it, it’s just a label. They can put it on me, I can take it off again, okay? I just a sovereign man who cares about my country, my people! I don’t want to see it turned into a 3rd World slum, it’s as simple as that!

Monika: Yeah!

Brizer: I have no animosity towards these people, wherever they come from. None at all. I wish them well in their countries. I’d love to see them thrive and do, but they don’t need to come here!

Monika: That is right! I am so glad you said that, no animosity towards these people. No. And think of it this way, if they are skilled people, and talented people, and they can do work, then they should have stayed home and done work in their own country and stayed there. They have abandoned their own countries. Now, if they are the criminals being let loose on us, we don’t want them either! Like go back home! I don’t have any personal animosity to any of them, either. And in jail I got along with everybody, no matter who they were really.

Brizer: You judge people by their character.

Monika: Exactly! Exactly! It’s these policies that are being made by people who want to replace us and do us in. And that is the important point. So people need to open their eyes and learn about it. And also they need to learn to not react to those words! Just let it fall off like water off a duck’s back, and laugh back at their faces.

Brizer: Laugh at them! That’s what we did on Thursday night when we were called “Nazi scum, get off our streets!” We just laughed at them! We all had our Irish flags. You know what flags they had? I saw an EU flag and a communist flag. That is what they had. There you go, that is very telling, isn’t it? And they were shouting:

“One race — human race!”

All this kind of thing. These are just idiots! Brainwashed idiots! A few people tried to go up and talk to them. And ask them, like:

“Why are you like this? I mean, we’re just standing up for our own country.”

And it was like:

“Fff-off Nazi! Fff-off fascist scum!”

Monika: They have nothing to say!

Brizer: They have nothing to say! They’re complete brainwashed idiots! And sadly Monika a lot of them, I could see, are university students. And with know the universities now, are complete cultural Marxist cesspits!

[100:31]

Monika: They are!

Brizer: Where they’re not being educated at all, they are being programmed and pumped with this nonsense!

Monika: That is right.

Brizer: I’m more worried, like this the next generation coming through, who are supposed to be educated. What are they going to be like? It’s bad now! What is it going to be like in 20 years time?

Monika: Yeah. The people who are getting it the easiest, are the people who are the ordinary folk working with their hands, the people who have not been “highly educated”, you know, in quotation marks. Because “highly educated” people have been highly programmed, [laughing] you know!

Brizer: A lot of people I meet in my circles of people who started up their own businesses and fell on hard times — no fault of their own — had literally everything taken off them.

Monika: Yes.

Brizer: So there’s nothing left, so they’re shouting out about it now and saying:

“I’ve not much left to loose.”

So I’m shouting out there. And maybe it has to kind of go down that way a bit. I don’t like to see people going through hardship, a lot of it is going on. But sometimes we have to kind of get into the darkness to come back into the light again.

Monika: Yeah.

Brizer: So we’re getting there. And another thing I wanted to bring up, I remember you were talking about it on the Andy Hitchcock Show, not too long ago. How any statements you make in your defense [Monika chuckles] can be used against you as another offense!

Monika: Yes.

Brizer: And I believe Alfred is due back in court in January, sometime.

Monika: Exactly! Now if that doesn’t make George Orwell roll over in his grave I don’t know what will! I mean, that is just mind blowing! What can you say? That in your own defense you cannot actually defend yourself. Like, for example, explaining how you reached these conclusions, or anything like that, because and you just recommitted another offence!

Brizer: Ohhh!

Monika: It’s laughable, except it’s so serious. And I’ll tell you one other example. I know we’re probably getting almost towards the end here but, …

Brizer: We can go over a bit, Monika. There’s no problem if you want to go over.

Monika: Okay. You were saying how the antifa people, or the counter demonstration people there, they just tell you to fff-off. They have nothing to say.

Well, I’ll tell you about a little incident in the trial too, where the prosecutor had absolutely nothing to say! This was after my lawyer had given a very rousing and, just a super powerful speech, I think was about 45 minutes long, and just filled with good information. And it was just such well documented information and whatnot. And he read it out, because in Germany that’s another issue — but we don’t even have time to go into that — if it’s not submitted in writing there’s no record of it. It’s just unbelievable! It’s like a secret trial in the Deep Dark Ages, that nothing, there’s no records, no transcript, no recording, of what went on in the trial!

But anyway, he did this, and when it came time for the prosecutor — they always have an opportunity to give a rebuttal, that kind of thing — well, she stands up and she says:

“You showed too much emotion in your speech!”

She was complaining about his tone of voice, because there was too much passion and emotion in it. Now, she had obviously found nothing that she could critique in the content of what he just said in this wonderful speech. And so she attacked him on that he was too passionate, or too emotional, and he looked over at the gallery once in a while, because he wasn’t just looking at judges. But it was just a surreal moment! And I did bring that up in my last word to that. I said:

“These issues that we’re talking about, this whole trial is about issues that go towards peace, and war, or destruction of our culture, or preservation of our people, and our culture. This is about the very fundamental question of life and death! And if we can not get emotional about these things, then what on earth can we get emotional about?”

And so I did raise that as an issue in my “last word”. And I just looked her straight in the eye when I said:

“If we can get emotional about these things what can we get emotional about?”

And I paused for a while and she starts squirming and having her funny smirk on her face that she always had when she was being like the devil. And it was surreal! It was surreal!

[105:08]

Brizer: Now you see these judges and politicians, they are all career judges, career politicians. Where all they care about is the big paycheck they get every month. From us, mainly!

Monika: Yes.

Brizer: From us! And then of course, you know, the lawyers who are making off like bandits, as well. So it’s a big corrupt system going on there. I suppose for say, you and Alfred to be going in there, you’re just ordinary people, you are up against a huge machine here. I’ve seen it myself, in my own experience, it’s daunting. But there’s more and more people now, who are going through the same thing. Whether you, like, facing eviction from their home. The homes that they worked hard, … [accidental musical interruption]. People now are beginning to see this.

And then this UN Global Compact thing has woken up quite a few people over here, because our government can’t WAIT to sign on the dotted line! Like Trudeau, over there in Canada.

See: Salim Mansur – Globalism and the UN Compact for Migration, Dec 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Now we have a gay, half Indian, prime minister over here, Leo Varadkar, an absolute traitor! I mean, this guy does not give a, I’ll say it, he doesn’t give a shit about the people of this country! None of this party, or none of the opposition, anybody! There’s no politicians who are there who will actually stand up for anything. We’re beginning to realize now it’s, of course, it’s up to us!

Monika: That’s right!

Brizer: We’ve got to get these gangsters out of out here!

Monika: Yeah, yeah.

Brizer: And the thing is again, it’s about getting the conversation going and getting more and more people, and maybe put in some kind of political party. And there are couple who are out there. I mean, the only problem I find with political parties is that they can get corrupted, as well, and infiltrated.

Monika: That’s right, they do get infiltrated. It’s like this Catch 22, how do you come up against it?

Brizer: Exactly! So we have to be aware of all of these things, we have to look at all the tricks that they pull in the trade.

We can use against them, in many ways. But just keep exposing them for tie lies and corruption.

Monika: Yeah, that is right. Like their measures are getting more and more extreme. And it’s like the devil is dancing more wildly, and ever closer to the light. And the light being truth, and the people waking up. But the devil is dancing, closer and closer, to the light, so that the shadows get worse, darker and more clear cut! And I mean, that we are all witnessing how they do seem to be going quite berserk, and they make a lot of mistakes, and so this does help a lot of people to see and wake up about it. So yeah, …

See: Andrew Hitchcock with Alison Chabloz – “No Regrets!” — TRANSCRIPT

Brizer: Your trial and Alfred’s trial has shown that. See what happened to Alison Chabloz in the UK, same thing.

Monika: Yes.

Brizer: She didn’t go to prison, but she’s on a suspended sentence. But she hasn’t shut up either. She can’t go on social media, but she’s still writing, still calling out the lies of this organization called the “Campaign Against Anti-semitism”.

See: Inside the Eye Live with Alison Chabloz – Mar 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Monika: Yeah!

Brizer: She’s received death threats and all this type of stuff.

Monika: Oh my goodness!

Brizer: I mean that’s a criminal offence right there! Where are the police there? Where are they? Where are they?

Monika: Oh! And speaking of that kind of thing. Like the things they do to us, and our comrades, and then they call us the “haters”!

Brizer: Yeah!

Monika: And they’re charging us for “hate” speech! And what is this “hate speech” thing anyway? When I talk to ordinary people about free speech and then they say:

“Oh, oh, of course, I believe in freedom of speech! But hate speech that’s different!”

And then you try to call them out on, what is that? What is “hate speech”?

Brizer: Well, we’re not preaching “hate”, Monika! Were preaching love! Love for our people, love for our country!

Monika: Exactly! And during the trial whenever there were non-court days following trial days, I would be telling my friends in prison how they were proving to us, over and over again, how they were supporting lies and that truth was on our side. And just by the things they were doing, and saying, in court and not allowing us to bring evidence. And just everything they’re doing.

You know, this prosecutor complaining about the emotion that my lawyer showed, critiquing what he said. So I was quite joyful, and happy, and telling them how we’re proving, over and over, how the truth lies on our side. Of course, I realized that wasn’t going to necessarily go in our favor, but I was just happy about it anyway. And then at the very end the judge said:

“We proved over and over again what haters we were!”

And then he looks right at me and he says:

 

“Oh! And we even learned that musicians and composers can be good haters too!”

[laughing] It was quite something! I mean, just everything is inverted! Everything is inverted!

[110:46]

Brizer: Everything! I’ve just come to realize that pretty much everything we’ve been told is a lie! Pretty much everything!

Monika: Yes.

Brizer: If it’s not a lie it’s been spun out in some way which suits them but not us. We’re being shafted, the ordinary folks of our country! We have been lied to, shouted to, and robbed!

Monika: Yeah.

Brizer: Our country has been stolen from underneath out feet!

We need to really get ourselves together here to save our civilization.

Monika: We really do.

Brizer: I’m committed to this! I don’t care, I’m going off, I’m ready! I’m ready for it! And I’ll do what I can.

It’s got to be said a lot of people are waking up. I spoke to a lot of people last Thursday night who know all about the jewish Question. They know big time what’s going on! And it was very refreshing, because I thought a lot of them were just kind of wanting to go on about, you know, :

 

“The Muslims are taking over!”

Yes. We know they are all coming over and we don’t want them here, particularly. We’d rather they stay in our own country and do their our own thing. Not against them or anything, but we don’t want them here. But we have to look beyond who’s controlling that. Who is on top of that pyramid? And people are beginning to get it now! And they know all about the “Holocaust” lie and are seeing it. And it’s very, it was really, it made my heart feel good, you know what I mean? Knowing that people, … I was in good form going home that night, knowing that my fellow folk are waking up to this and are beginning to realize this. And more, and more, people are doing it. That’s why, as I said they are coming go in now trying to bring in these “hate speech” laws.

See: Red Ice Radio: Dr Andrew Joyce – The History of Jewish Influence — TRANSCRIPT (Part 1)

Monika: Yes.

Brizer: We can challenge all of that, because again, speaking your mind, or even being hateful, is not a crime!

Monika: That’s right!

Brizer: It’s as simple as that!

Monika: And I like how you’ve expressed it too. Just, because you don’t want these people in your own country, doesn’t mean you have something personally against them as individuals. No! You just don’t want them in your own country.

Brizer: Exactly!

Monika: That’s all!

Brizer: Think about it. Bring it back to your own house. You are not going to invite all and sundry into your house, and feed them, and clothe them, and look after them, and give them everything! Of course, you’ll invite your friends and people you know. You’re going to be a nice host and look after people. We all do it. But you are not going to invite strangers in, to just take everything you have and then just throw you out! [Monika chuckles]

Monika: Exactly!

Brizer: But this is the same with our country, because our country is our home. This is our home! We have nowhere else to go to!

Monika: That’s right.

Brizer: So, we can’t emigrate to Nigeria, or Somalia. They won’t let us in. Wrong skin colour! Well that’s racist! There we go!

Monika: Didn’t you hear about it? The only people that are able to be racist are whites? Didn’t you hear that? [laughing]

Brizer: Oh yes! It’s the same again, blacks and Africans can come to Europe, and move in, call themselves “migrants” and “refugees”, or whatever. White South Africans? Oh, no! No! No! Can’t have them!

Monika: Isn’t that just something else! Oh my goodness! We should actually be looking towards South Africa to see what they have in mind with us. I mean, the real story of South Africa, because they certainly don’t talk about it in the mainstream media very much, what is actually going on there right now. It’s just an absolute tragedy what’s going on there.

See: A Blind Eye to Murder of Whites in South Africa

Brizer: Clearly. We’ve had guests on here about that.

Monika: Yeah, that’s good., you know, thing I’d like to say, kind of as a hopeful thing, is that they are in such a panic! And they keep showing us what a panic they’re in, you know, they’re trying to shut down this and that site. And they throw people in jail. That means they’re in a panic. Now if they’re in a panic, that should actually be a sign that there is hope for us. Because if there was no hope for us, then they wouldn’t have to resort to these measures. They’d already have it all all fixed up, and done with, right? But they don’t!

Brizer: No they don’t.

Monika: Yeah, that’s my message of hope! It gives me a lot of hope! I think that if they were so, … Why were they so worried about me? Little old me!

Brizer: Yeah!

Monika: Like why were they worried about me?

Brizer: Yeah, some little lady in Jasper, Alberta playing her violin. She’s a threat to humanity, somehow? That is amazing isn’t it?

Monika: Yeah.

Brizer: That is crazy! A here’s little old me who’s worked most of my life, trying to take my house away. And I’m fighting back. I’m a threat. Because I talk to people who are of a like mind, or care about the country, I’m a “fascist”, a “neo-Nazi”! Whatever! But I don’t care! I don’t care about any of that. I just get on, talk to people about it. I used to be a little bit reticent a few years ago, but not anymore!

Monika: Yeah!

Brizer: Time for all of that has stopped! I speak out my mind. If you disagree with me, fine!

If you don’t want to listen to me, well go away then. Because I’m not going to talk to you if you don’t want to listen to me. But I’ll talk to people who want to listen to me. And there are people who are listening. There might be only one, or two, in a group of ten, but that is one, or two people. If somebody even listens to you a little bit, and gets a little bit of what you’re talking about, that’s a result!

Monika: Yeah. That’s great! Actually, having gone to jail for me, like I mean, I was already feeling quite free to speak oh before that. Like, as soon as that video [Sorry Mom] went out into the world, I felt freed up by that. Because okay, now I’ve broken the big taboo, now I can just talk freely! That was very liberating for me.

And then going to jail and then discovering that they do their verdict first anyway, and then they’ll put the show on afterwards, it also kind of gives a certain sense of freedom, ironically, you know?

Brizer: Yeah.

Monika: But it does. It frees you up, we’re free!

Brizer: Yes, you’re free! Because you don’t worry about anything anymore! You don’t worry about any of these labels, nothing! I don’t care about it any more. And I just get out now and just say, I speak my mind, and I don’t care what anybody, I don’t care about it really. I used to be like that:

“Oh! What will the neighbours think?”

That nonsense! Just say it! Speak your mind.

Monika: Exactly!

Brizer: It’s wonderful, let it go!

Monika: Yeah.

Brizer: Before we finish up Monika, how is Alfred doing? Have you been in touch with him? Any kind of communication with him?

Monika: Oh yeah. He writes just such excellent letters. So we’re writing letters. They take a long time to get back and forth. But, you know, he is such a positive person and in good spirits! Pretty much all the time. Although it was heartbreaking just after the trial was over, because suddenly he felt very, very alone there. But he got over that pretty quick. And then, he’s its just such a positive guy! And he’s got a job, and the job is not to get rich! He’s making about one euro twenty an hour in the job, in the laundry there. But the job gets him out of his cell and socializing with other people.

And he’s such a sociable character too, that I think he’s going to find that people just gravitate towards him and like him. He’s funny as get go! I mean, he has me in stitches so much, and the thing is [chuckling] I grew up with this guy, so I had the benefit of having that great sense of humor around me as we were growing up. And then during the trial too. Like once he was imprisoned, as well as me, and we’d be filed in and out of the court room from the basement dungeon’s waiting cells — because we’re in separate waiting cells always. Like, they wouldn’t allow us to be in the same waiting cell, because that means we might actually have, you know, conversation with each other.

But even the guards there, they got pretty friendly, and kind of turned a blind eye to us yakking the whole way down the halls and up the stairs, and all that. We were yakking, and just in stitches, laughing sometimes! I mean, his sense of humour is just terrific. And he always sees the silver lining of the cloud, in any situation. And we saw that before when they raided his home, and then he right away says:

“Okay, well yeah, thank you very much for that opportunity! I’ll make another video out of that!”

That type of thing. And he carries on in that vein, so it’s just wonderful. And I just want to stress to people that if you write letters, write cards, write whatever, just do it! It’s a really easy thing to do, but I know for younger people, they sometimes need instruction of how to do that! [laughing] You know, you just have to stick a piece of paper in an envelope, seal it, put a stamp in the right hand corner, go to the post office, get a stamp for the right amount, and address it, and send it off! And I mean, I know it sounds funny to be giving instructions, but I know for a lot of younger people they’ve never sent a letter in the snail mail letter system!

Brizer: Yeah, the old fashioned way of doing things. The old ways!

[120:27]

Monika: Yeah. [laughing]

Brizer: Well just put out the address. It’s coming go up for Christmas folks. And you still have time I’m sure. Send a Christmas card to Alfred. Just wish him a Merry Christmas, that’s all.

Just say you’re thinking about him and all the rest of it. That is all. It’s:

Alfred Schaefer
Stadelheim Prison
Stadelheimer Straße
81549 Munich,
Germany

[As of 2020]

Hindenburgring 12

86899 Landberg am Lech

Germany

And I’m sure he’d love to get them from all his supporters all around the world who know what he’s been doing, what he’s going through. It looks like he could be there for a while. Do you ever think he might get out early, on good behavior, or something like that?

Monika: Unfortunately they don’t, … Other prisoners, they could be violent criminals, they could be in there for whatever, they generally can be let out at two thirds, if they’re on good behavior, that kind of thing.

But not political prisoners! No! They kept Ernst Zundel, they kept him until the very last 5 years sentence, the maximum sentence. They don’t let political prisoners out one day early, ever! But he would get out earlier if, for example, the regime changes! That if the regime falls! And once again Alfred is optimistic that, that will happen. He’s in now for 3 years two months. But they have another court case coming up in January. Plus he’s still got this Dresden thing hanging over his head, that still hasn’t been dealt with, finished, for a speech he gave there in, I think it was in 2017.

There’s all these things, like they intend to keep them in there for a long, long, time. But hopefully that’s not going to be the case.

Brizer: We are praying for him. We have to put ir out there into the universe, all of us, to stop it, because this is pure injustice! There’s only one word for it. This is totally wrong! Totally wrong!

So, anyway Monika your last words please, to everybody. All I can say is, you’re a heroine! One day they will be naming streets in Germany for you, and Alfred, and others. Ernst Zundel, Robert Faurrison, and others who went before us.

Monika: Yeah.

Brizer: You know, we have to look to that day that we will get there. We have a big struggle ahead, there’s no doubt about that. But as long as we stand together, start talking to people about this, getting people to think, getting people’s heads out of mobile phones, and the TVs and all that nonsense, the mainstream media which is just filling their heads full of crap! Let’s get out there and do the ground! It’s up to us, as you have said. It’s up to us!

Monika: It is indeed! It is indeed! It is up to us. And thank you for those very kind words. And I also want to just thank you, and Graham Hart, for putting this together, and just for doing all the work you’re doing. It just is so important, and it is up to us! We can’t just wait and hope that:

“Oh it’s going to get better all on its own!”

Because it isn’t going to get better all on its own! We need to do the work! And it is not just a little game. Our very existence is at stake here! It is big. This is the big times!

Brizer: We are living in credibly “interesting times”, as the Chinese say. We are at a unique point in history, because this is probably the first time where a civilization is at risk here, the White race, the White people!

But we’ve got a small window of opportunity to turn this around. But as each day goes by, that window gets smaller.

Monika: Yes.

Brizer: And we have a corrupt, … We know what’s running the whole show at the top of the pyramid, but we know that. But we’ve got a corrupt government, corrupt officials, everybody, playing their part for the shekels. And we’ve got to pull them down first, and then well come after the others. Because then they will have nothing. They’ve got nothing else to stand on, have they? They’ve got nothing!

Monika: That’s right, because they suck their energy solely from us, or from the host. I mean, it is a parasitic relationship! They have used those words themselves. And we’re not just guessing this. It is that way, and we do need to regain our spirit, and regain our health. And part of that regaining of our health is from detoxifying ourselves of the lies and the deception. And what you said is so good, about unhooking from the television, and the mainstream. It is poison! It is poisoning our minds! Yes. And so we need to get healthy again and regain our spirits.

See: The Realist Report – Tanstaafl: The Jew As A Parasite — TRANSCRIPT

[125:40]

Brizer: Eating healthy and doing the healthy things to get our body strong, because if we’re not strong, in ourselves we can’t fight this. And that is another way they’re attacking us, is on the health front. GMOs and fluoride in the water, all this type of stuff. Vaccines, we know what they are doing.

Monika: Oh yes!

Brizer: And that is another form of genocide that they are pushing on us, you know what I mean?

Monika: Yes! They’re attacking us chemically as well. That’s right, that is a whole other topic.

Brizer: Another whole topic. Another whole show on it. They’re attacking us from every angle. And we’re kind of in a corner. But the one thing is, that there are more of us than there are of them. So the more of us that get together, … And it is growing, that’s why I’ll always kind of remain optimistic, even though I get very frustrated sometimes when I see it the apathy around me. But there are a lot of people, and I’ve met them, and it’s great to know that they are on my side. They’ll support me, I’ll support them! That’s what it’s all about. So there we go.

Monika: Yes! Thank you so much for having me on!

Brizer: Monika, absolute pleasure having you on. Thank you! You lost pretty much a year of your life there, but you’ve come out, you’ve put out a beautiful message there. You’re still just standing strong, not giving up. We’re all praying for Alfred and wishing him well. Let’s keep it going, guys! It’s up to us, as you said.

So Monika, thank you very much indeed! Wish you all the best for Christmas, and the New Year! May it be a lot better than the last one. Put it that way.

Monika: Thank you so much, and to you too! I wish you all the best! Thank, you very much. Bye, bye.

Brizer: We will call it a day. Monika, if you want to stay on for a little bit afterwards, no problem.

Monika: I certainly will. Yes.

Brizer: Hang in there. Folks, thanks very much for listening.

We’ll be back again next week, same time, not sure the guest. I think we could be having Max Igan on. But I’m not sure yet. But all going well, next week, same time we’ll be back, okay. So take care folks! And as usual we’re going to sign off with a great song!

“The Goyim Know!“

And by god the goyim do know! And it’s growing! Take care folks.

[Song lyrics]

https://lyricstranslate.com/en/unknown-Artist-english-goyim-know-lyrics.html

The Goyim Know.
Hey, ha Chaim.
(What?)
I think the goyim know.
(That’s ridiculous, the goyim don’t know!)
I think they know, there.
(They don’t know)
They know.

The goyim know, the goyim know.
They know all the things that we have done.
And now they’re telling everyone.

The goyim know.
The goyim know.

They know all the things we did back then.
And now we’re trying to do it again.
But the goyim know, the goyim know.

We wanna open the borders to their countries.
And fill them with diversity.
But the goyim know, the goyim know.

(SOLO)

The goyim know (the goyim know)
The goyim know (the goyim know)

We wanna turn the women into men.
And make the guys more feminine.
The goyim know (the goyim know)
The goyim know (the goyim know)

We wanna make the white man, feel guilty.
And put the black man all over the TV.
The goyim know (the goyim know)
The goyim know (the goyim know)

And soon they won’t want us around.
We’re gonna have to shut it down..

Cause the goyim know.
The goyim know.
The goyim know.
Cause the goyim know.
Cause the goyim know.

[130:58]

END

============================================

NOTES

===============================================

See Also:

Brian Ruhe — Monika Schaefer’s First Public Appearance Since Imprisonment in Germany! Nov 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Brian Ruhe Show — Monika Schaefer – One Month in the “Free World”, Nov 26, 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

The Graham Hart Show — Brizer with Monika Schaefer, Dec 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

============================================

PDF Notes

Version 1 —

* Total words = 21,471
* Total images = 29
* Total A4 pages =

(Available later)

Version History

Version 12: May 19, 2022 — Improved formatting. Added link for Orwell House.

Version 11: Jan 5, 2020 — Re-uploaded images for katana17.com/wp/ version. Updated Alfred Schaefer’s prison address.

Version 10: Dec 30, 2018 — Added See Also links.

Version 9: Dec 29, 2018 — Added 20 more minutes. Added 14 images. Total transcript complete = 131 minutes. TRANSCRIPT NOW COMPLETE!

Version 8: Dec 28, 2018 — Added 10 more minutes. Added 2 images. Total transcript complete = 110 minutes

Version 7: Dec 27, 2018 — Added 10 more minutes. Total transcript complete = 100 minutes

Version 6: Dec 24, 2018 — Added 10 more minutes. Added 6 images. Total transcript complete = 90 minutes

Version 5: Dec 23, 2018 — Added 10 more minutes. Total transcript complete = 80 minutes

Version 4: Dec 22, 2018 — Added 8 more minutes. Total transcript complete = 70 minutes

Version 3: Dec 21, 2018  — Added 10 more minutes. Added 1 image. Total transcript complete = 62 minutes

Version 2: Dec 20, 2018  — Added 22 more minutes. Total transcript complete = 52 minutes

Version 1: Dec 19, 2018  — Published post. 30 minutes of transcript complete.

[In this interview Dennis Fetcho talks with Alison Chabloz about her upcoming court appearance (March 7) after being charged under the Communications Act in the UK, for causing “gross offence” to some jews, by uploading several of her songs to YouTube, that parody the nonsense claimed by some alleged “Holocaust survivors“.

Readers are urged to show support for Alison by, if possible, attending her court appearance this Wednesday morning at Central London Magistrates Court   — KATANA.]

UPDATE: “A blogger accused of broadcasting anti-Semitic songs has told a court there was “no proof” gas chambers were used to kill Jewish people in World War Two. …

The trial continues and a decision is expected in May [2018].”

Source: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-derbyshire-43321482

Inside the Eye Live

with

Alison Chabloz

Mar 3, 2018

Click here for the audio:

https://ia601503.us.archive.org/33/items/ITELRadioFullShow3.3.18/ITEL%20Radio%20Full%20Show%20-%203.3.18.mp3

Click here for: Inside the Eye — Live!

Published on Sat, Mar 3, 2018

Dennis Fetcho, Inside the Eye – Live! 2018.03.03

Dennis Fetcho, aka “The Fetch“, is an American ex-patriot living in Amman, Jordan.  He is the author of the Illuminatus Observor, a blog regarded by many as simply the finest Hermetic Qaballa blog in all of blogdom. The Fetch also has a second site called “Inside The Eye – Live!“ 

Alison Chabloz appeared on Inside the Eye – Live! on Saturday, March 3, 2018. Alison’s first appearance in November of 2016 was greeted the following day with an arrest initiated by an Israeli front NGO/charity known as “The Committee Against Anti-Semitism”.

Alison will be in court on Wednesday, March 7, 2018 in what, hopefully, will bring about a successful closure for the interests of free speech and Western values in the face of Jewish onslaught against Western civilization.

Many items of discussion were raised in this entertaining and delightful interview, including the ongoing social media purges, destruction of social working groups, “anti-Semitism”, and so much more.

Definitely worth a listen for anyone interested in contemporary battles for the heart and soul of Western civilization.

Hour 1 – News And Current Events

Hour 2 – Guest: Alison Chabloz

Hour 3 – News And Current Events

TRANSCRIPT

(106 mins)

[00:00]

Intro: Good morning everyone! Coming from somewhere in the Middle East. It is Saturday morning’s hottest streaming media political talk show! Inside the Eye Live with the Fetch!

If it was up to me I’d dump the Israelis tomorrow!

Hey good idea! Did someone tell us a standing member of Congress, that if it were up to them they would dump Israelis tomorrow?

Sound like something you might hear here on Inside the Eye Live.

The Fetch! Oh what a man! Oh my god! You have to listen to that show! He was brilliant! I didn’t know he had gonads of steel, like that! And a mind like a frigging razor! I didn’t realize the was so clear. He cut through that cognitive dissonance that is going on in the whole patriot movement!

Now it’s time for Inside the Eye Live! Intelligent media for the politically aware!

[01:20]

Fetch: This is the Fetch. And you are live Inside the Eye. Today’s date is Saturday March third, 2018. A good Saturday morning to all of you listening in the United States, and Canada, and a good late afternoon and evening to all of you listening in European and Asian time zones. And, of course, wherever you are listening out there on the worldwide web, or our F.M. and micro F.M. Broadcasting outlets, may all be well with you and yours.

The weather here in Riyadh is actually quite a comfortable day. Hitting a high of about seventy-five degrees right now. We’re certain as of the just sunset, just a few minutes ago we’re sitting at what? I don’t know something like seventy-one degrees so it’s really really nice. Got winds about seven miles per hour out of the south-east. And overall just sunny skies, just a beautiful day today. We’re going to be going down to what? Let’s see what the morning lows are going to be tomorrow. It looks like we’re going to go down to fifty-five degrees in the hour before sunrise, and throughout the useful part of the evening looks it like are going to be around sixty degrees, which is going to be about one o’clock in the morning here. So very, very nice weather for sure. So you have very, very nice weather.

And again thanks for the feedback over there. We’re going to be pretty much same old same all again. A little bit of a rise in temperature over the next few days, but for the most part here in Riyadh it’s going to be in the seventies, lower eighty’s, and then we’re going to hit maybe ninety, ninety-two by next weekend, but that’s not expected to last. We’re getting that tease of the summer months now, where we are hitting the ninety’s, but we are not getting it to sustain. The folklore around these parts, there’s actually a folklore about the man who sold his jacket too soon! And it has to deal, excuse me while I drink some coffee folks, has to deal with this idea of people selling their winter cloths before the winter is really over.

And so what happens here is it gets a little deceptive. You get a few days in the ninety’s. Next thing, you know, you’re almost down to freezing again. And so there’s that whole folklore story about the old man who sold his jacket too soon. Meaning that he just really wasn’t prepared to stick it out through the final part of the winter, and now he’s stuck in a bad situation, because he doesn’t have enough clothing to actually stay warm through the balance of the winter. But, you know, winter’s really coming to a draw, or to a close now, pretty quickly. We’ve only got a few weeks to go really before winter ends.

[04:08]

But that’s not really relevant I guess for the people of Britain, where you’ve got still lots of snow and ice warnings throughout the UK. It looks like the kids are out there having fun now, sledding around. Authorities warn that the rail travelers and drivers should expect ongoing disruptions even as temperatures rose above freezing for the first time in a few days. Heathrow Airport warned travelers to check with airlines before arriving at the airport. So if you’re listening you might want to do that everybody. Two hospitals in southwest England continue to appeal for four by four drivers to help get essential staff to work. Saying that icy roads still pose a problem. There are thousands in the UK still without power and flood warnings remain for some coastal regions. The Met Office said that temperatures are likely to inch up to 7 degrees Celsius. That’s 44 degrees Fahrenheit in the southern city of Plymouth. So they’re starting to see a little bit of warmer weather, but they’ve had quite a chill blow through the UK recently.

Meanwhile across the English Channel, the big chill, as they call it right now froze the canals in the Dutch capital of Amsterdam. So that means that you had ice on the historic Prinsengracht canal, which was thick enough for residents to lace up their skates and glide across the surface! How cool is that? I mean, I would love to do that, quite frankly. Live in a city where your canals freeze over, put your ice skates on, and just kind of cruise down the canal! That’s faster than walking, that’s for darn sure. So what a lot of fun time! I love winter folks! Winter is a great time a year, I know it’s a bit expensive for the traveling and not the traveling but the, you know, the heating bills and things like that. But you gotta love snow! You got to just love the way that ice comes down and just coats everything White! And I know everybody, you know, we in the European civilization we’ve been instructed now that snow, that’s right! Even snow is politically incorrect and probably is racist! You know, Mother Nature had a very racist tone when she created the idea of snow. So, you know, how the Leftist nutcakes are out there in the world today.

Now I was just out all week. I was at what’s called the AFED convention, here in Riyadh. And it’s called the “Armed Forces Exposition for Diversifying” their supplier base. There’s something like eighty thousand items were on display, not on display, not all eighty thousand, but some eighty thousand items are going up for bid. Basically taking that business away from US companies, and European companies for that matter and trying to diversify the supplier base here in Saudi to create jobs for their people. Mind you, that’s not a bad thing guys. Governments are creating jobs for their people, that’s not a bad thing. I had meetings and discussions with Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop, British Aerospace, and major heavyweights here like Taqnia, Sarvik.

Had a great to actually discussion with Sarvik.

Lets see, Armaco America on, Saudi Armaco America on. Really a lot of key players here were present. And so I worked the darn show for four days, five days, really had a lot of good high level meetings here about future plans going on inside of Saudi Arabia.

[07:48]

And the excitement somewhat is there! Now as I was leaving today I just left the facility about five fifteen this afternoon and rushed home. Got home just ten minutes ago, quite frankly, to try to get set up for the radio show. But as I was there one of the, I think the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or the commander for the Saudi ground forces was there. He’s from the House of Saud. There was quite festivity. They had marching bands coming through, military marching bands, that would be. They had, really this guy had, like he was like, locally it’s like a rock star person. You know, we Americans, it’s not that big a deal. But nonetheless he did have some, you could see the energy coming off these guys! You know, it’s interesting if you guys are ever around power, or powerful people, they do carry about them a type of energy and a type of charisma. It’s hard to quantify, but you can certainly feel it, as they walk by. If you’re tuned into what is going on. And I can’t quite put my finger on it, but you can actually feel it! It’s rather a fascinating phenomenon.

So he was cruising around. So I got some pictures in. Not with him. But I got some pictures of him and some people that we know, of interest to us. So it was really quite an interesting show. If you’ve never been to one of these trade shows that has to deal with defense, or military weapons, or anything of that nature. You might want to look into it. It’s actually quite good stuff, just to get yourself educated. I learned quite a bit today and all throughout the week. So we had quite a lot of fun for sure. As we visited the show here today.

[09:35]

You can join us in the chat room everybody, Inside the Eye Live dot com. That’s Inside the Eye Live dot com. And I’m heading over there now everybody. And it’s now loading the page. You just click on the live chat button up there on the menu bar. That gets you over there. You’ll see my buddy, One Eye sleeping up a storm over there. And now we are there, I got Road Dogger, Wolfgang, Fake War, White Devil 1970, that’s a new name, so welcome. Uncle Douchebag, Black Bird is there, so already humming along. Saturdays are a great time to catch the chat room for sure. So definitely give us a shot over there. Say hello and see what else is going on. And lots of good information come through the chat room, when a show of this nature comes on. So it’s very, very good.

Good morning! I guess I can say good morning, right everybody? It’s telephone lines. If you’d like to call and get in early one three two three two seven five one three one four. That’s one three two three two seven five one three one four. And we’re going to have a guest in hour number two. Alison Chabloz. She is the gal from the UK that’s being targeted by the Committee for Anti-Semitism, or Committee Against Anti-Semitism, or something.

It’s basically a troll operation by a couple of jewish goons. From observing from the outside, these guys are thugs! I mean, these are literally jewish thugs! That’s our observation, again from the outside. But inside of the UK, these thugs carry at least some weight. They’re able to bring trials, and they’re able to bring charges against people. And that obviously, is not a great thing! So we’re asking people to obviously try to make it out to the Westminster courthouse tomorrow [Wed, 7th March], to support Alison Chabloz and really support your own interests, as to preserving your ability to speak freely in the face of jewish tyranny. And so it’s very, very important that you get out there.

[12:10]

You know, there’s been a lot of complaints to me recently. And they’re all valid, by the way. About jewish organizations, like Facebook, and Youtube. And then Twitter, which isn’t necessarily jewish, but works hand in hand with the ADL and the SPLC. And what is happening here is these anti-American, jewish organizations, like again the ADL and the SPLC especially. What they’ve done is they’re creating algorithms on behalf of, or in line, or in collaboration with Facebook, which is a jewish, let’s be honest Facebook is a jewish intel gathering site! YouTube, which is essentially now being super censored by jews, I guess, within the company. And then, of course, Twitter which is also censored quite heavily in favor of jews, and their agenda of bigotry, hate, or whatever you want to call it in there, with the way they use our language.

So they’ve created this idea called an “online hate index”. And imagine that our entire civilization is being dominated, or suppressed, by a hyper criminal gang stalking type of operation, like the ADL, or the SPLC! Folks, these guys spy on you! They go back and they monitor what you said ten, five, six years ago! And should you ever get into a position of some type of influence, they have run your entire history and say:

“This person said this about jews in 2005! They must be terminated! They must apologize! They must bow down to us jews now! , or else! Terminate them!”

You know, it’s like, guys this is a tyranny!

There’s a battle, really waging! It’s just like swirling around us now for control of political thought, political opinion, political ideas!

[14:25]

It’s become absolutely unconscionable that our major corporations, like a YouTube, like a Twitter, like a Facebook, that have garnered so much monopoly power, are able to participate in the political process, because that’s exactly what they are doing! When you have essentially a utility, like Facebook, like Twitter, like YouTube, that are engaged in taking sides inside of the political spectrum, they are no longer corporations serving the public interest. They are corporations serving a specific interest, or a special interest. And when it becomes clear that Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, are clearly coming down on the side of foreign powers, like Israel, like the cosmopolitan internationalists, like the jewish power structure inside of America, then we know, as Americans, as British, as Germans, Swedes, as a united European group, that we have a very serious enemy working within our midst!

And, quite frankly, since these still remain from a, let’s just call a demographic still, they remained our majority positions, we should make it an absolute priority to do whatever is necessary to smash the ability of these corporations to control the flow of ideas! It is high time that the people that are making these decisions, start feeling the heat. And that the investor … [breaking up].

Everyone who are interested in the preservation of your nation states, really it’s time for real serious debate! Every day, absolutely, they brag about it. And it’s unconscionable that we continue with this treasonous fifth column in our midst and some obviously have to, … [breaking up]

[17:06]

Welcome back! It’s the Fetch Inside the Eye Live. Intelligent media for the politically aware, right here in revolution radio and Revolution dot com radio! Good Saturday morning everybody here on this March the third. Rapidly approaching, what do we call that, the spring equinox. And, of course, that means that winter will have officially finished. And we’re going to be rolling into spring before, you know, it! I know here I’ve only got a couple more months to go here on this particular contract and I’ll be out of the country. And obviously working overtime I think lately! Trying to get something happening! But yeah we are going to be out of Saudi Arabia ourselves, before, really, before summer. After right before the Ramadan holiday which is going to be somewhere around the month of Ramadan that is, somewhere around May sixteenth, the seventeenth. I’m hoping to wrap everything up and get home.

So guys we’re trying to wrap things up. Just want to remind you that in hour number two Alison Chabloz is going to be coming on. Alison is, of course, kind of famous for really being assaulted, I don’t know if you could call assaulted, but targeted by what’s called “C AA”, which by all indications appears to be an Israeli hate organization. It goes after pretty much anybody and everybody that they feel like. That they feel like they can pick off in a trollish way. Their actions are uncouth, to say the least. Their actions are uncivilised, they’re barbaric. They’re basically jewish, in a nut shell!

When we talk about jews and their uncouth, uncivilized, disgusting, quite frankly, mentality! Their lack of etiquette, their lack of morals, or lack of values, we’re often thinking about groups like the Committee Against Anti-Semitism, or something like that. Campaign Against, … anyway, a lot of people call this a fake NGO. But it is an Israeli run NGO. Israeli paid for NGO. And it’s really trying to stifle free speech in the UK.

And, quite frankly, to those of you who are in the UK and understanding this message, you’ve got to get over there to the Westminster courthouse and make your stand! Let it be known that you are tired of these punks and thugs that happen to be, oh boy! Just happen to be jews! Always trying to stifle debate and real discourse here in the West. Look, they’re not part of our culture. They are not part of our civilization! And it’s time for us to accept that. And to start pushing back! , because there’s a hundred times, or a thousand times more of us than them! And as long as everybody’s just quiet and cowering in the face of this hyper rabid minority, well they’re going to keep pushing, because they don’t know any other way folks! They only know how to act like a bunch of idiots, and that’s just the way it goes. Deal with it! They don’t like you! They don’t like your civilization! They don’t like your culture! They’re going to do anything they can to supplant you and destroy you!

So okay, understand that’s the game, and start to deal with it accordingly! That would be my advice.

[20:22]

Just like to remind you this is listener sponsored and supported radio. It relies upon your donations to help keep the network alive, funded, etc., etc., The best thing you can do is work your way over to Revolution dot radio. That’s right, Revolution dot radio, and when you go there, there is a page called, I’m going there now just so I can get a good handle on it. It’s called “Funding”. And if you click on the “Funding” page, you’ll see that so far we’re three days into this, we’ve raised about 173 dollars of the goal of to, 700 a month.

There’s books that you can buy. Looks like there is, I got to update my pages here. But guys, again there’s things you can, there’s swag as you call it. There’s the-shirts, I don’t know what else we have there. But my favorite thing guys is just, because we like this show so much. I’m assuming you like the show, is to get out there and make a donation on behalf of Inside the Eye Live. It’s very little, three, four, five dollars a month. Our attitude is, look if we can get one hundred of you guys and gals out there to sponsor the show at four dollars a month, that’s a dollar a week basically. And there’s one hundred of you that would be four, or five hundred dollars a month, that we would be raising straight up! Just for this show and Inside the Eye Prime Time. And so guys we really encourage you to do that, because again, with the way things are getting de-platformed nowdays, it’s really hard to build these platforms! And it’s worse for taking care of the platform itself and that means by fundamental ng it and helping keep the thing going. So guys, again we ask you to make a donation on behalf of Inside the Eye Live.

And again, three to four dollars, five dollars a month would be a great thing! Now the Intel Cat Report, of course, is how we are partially sponsored here. It’s proudly sponsored by North Cacalacky Trading Post, goods services and solutions for all things great and small. It’s inconveniently located at the corner of Walk and Don’t Walk and, of course, by Blackbird Nine Breakfast Club. A radio show hosted by Blackbird Nine, aka, Frederick C. Blackburn. Frederick is an NSA whistleblower, 9/11 Truth advocate, former thirty-two degree Mason, and a former North Carolina House candidate. And you can hear Blackbird Nine’s Breakfast Club every Wednesday evening from eight to ten pm on the Spreeker network. For more information you can visit Blackbird Nine Trading Post dot org. That’s Blackbird Nine Trading Post dot org.

Well, not a whole lot to report on the Cat Report today. It’s been very quiet this past week. The House has been quiet. Mating season everybody is pretty much over, you know. What that entails, is One Eye, the big guy, he is staying home again. He just kind of goes out does his thing. Stays out for an hour, or two. Kind of like wanders around and get some fresh air and by the afternoon hours one eye is right back inside the house chillin.

And saw a nice picture of him today. He was up on their favorite perch. I got to say take some pictures of these so you guys can just see what I’m talking about. But when I was out there in the kitchen, just chillin, we still got the cardboard there, so that black cat can’t jump into our house. But he was chillin and sleepin. And it was kind of cute this morning, I was on the phone to Jordan and One Eye comes into the bedroom. And he does it meow everybody, he kind of talks to you. Actually, my cats don’t meow too much. They all kind of talk. And so he just came in the room and he just like meowing at Emilie. And hey, you know, hopped up on the bed, climbed up to her left shoulder and just laid his head down, a starting to rub his head into her, basically around her armpits! I hope she took a shower! That, I hope she did! I’m sure she did! But you have to wonder sometimes with the way the cats react. But he just was a sweetheart today as usual. Bruiser usually has a sweet heart quite frankly. So for a blind cat what a great little guy!

But that’s about it you don’t not a whole lots going on right now. Not a whole lot around here quite frankly. The cats I used to feed Ma, she’s a mom again, you can see she’s nursing some kittens. She’s running around looking for food today. I saw our outside my hotel today. But it’s been very, very quiet, quite frankly. Even the fights, that I used to hear a lot around the house every night, sometimes two, three for a night they have been tapering down to one every other day. So it’s been very quiet. Cats just trying to get back to the routine of just being cats and not worrying about mating season., because mating season, if you really follow cats, it can be a really crazy, wild, insane time! , but that’s about it for the Intel Cat Report. Again probably sponsored by a North Cacalacky Trading Post, good services and solutions for all things great and small. And also, of course, by Blackbird Nine Breakfast Club. A radio show hosted by Blackbird Nine, aka Frederick C. Blackburn. And again you can hear Blackbird Nine Breakfast Club every Wednesday evening, from eight to ten pm on the Spreaker radio network.

And if you haven’t heard his shows, this guy really puts a lot of effort into his shows. It’s very well researched. Very well-organized. Very well presented, and so it’s a different style show for sure, but if you haven’t heard it before you ought to give it a call, or give it a listen, because we’re sure you’re going to like it. We know, because his audience continues to grow. So check out Blackbird Nine Breakfast Club! Again, every Wednesday evening from eight to ten pm on Spreeker. And then you can, of course, get up more information at Blackbird Nine Trading Post dot org.

[26:54]

Oy Vey Moment. [Music]

[27:20]

This Oy Vey moment is brought to you by Radio Wehrwolf and Heartland online. Radio Wehrwolf is now streaming twenty-four hours of no nonsense, uncensored radio, centered around the pro European Western Civilization spirit. And be sure to catch all their live shows eight o’clock pm Eastern. To listen live, or catch the archive shows a related content, visit Wehrwolf Radio dot com. That’s WEHR Wolf Radio dot com. And if you want to expand. Your information options and find like-minded content visit Heartland Online dot net, or you will find many popular and insightful Western centric podcast, news articles, videos music, and much more, including yours truly, The Fetch and Inside the Eye Live, so just remember Radio Wehrwolf as WEHR Wolf and Heartland Online dot com.

[28:26]

And everybody, this week’s “Oy Vey Moment” is coming to us from Poland. And it really is some of the fallout coming from the recent passing and now suspension of a law that made it a crime to implicate Poland in the “Holocaust”. See it was, of course, Poles are actually quite guilty of murdering many, many Germans. In fact, perhaps over a million Germans. So the Poles are not innocent on this, by any stretch of the imagination. And that’s with all due respect to our listeners in Poland.

I think all of us have an obligation, quite frankly, to recognize the crimes of our governments, and to deal with it in a professional way, and draw attention to it, so that we can really start to set the record straight. Because, quite frankly, a lot of us have been fighting this scourge called, really this jewish scourge, in all it’s different manifestations. And the Poles have done it, I guess in their way, from time, or from generations on. You know, from generations, some generations, or whatever. The Russians, of course, about their experiences. We Americans have lost many millions of people. Probably, quite frankly, to the scourge, through the various wars that jews have convinced us to fight. The Canadians equally are under a very heavy strain right now to jewish tyranny. The Brits themselves, are a proud people, who have had, of course, many of their crimes had been committed under the flag of Britain too.

[29:55]

So guys to us, one of the things I think we should always do is recognize the crimes of the government, so we have a very fair understanding of history. Is not fair, quite frankly, for the Russians and the Poles, and in my opinion, again I’m not there, I don’t understand. But I know they’re at each others throats, quite often. I guess I can respect that. It’s their nature, their culture. But at the same time, a lot of the crimes committed over the last century was done by the jewish people themselves!

They were some of the greatest mass murderers this planet has ever witnessed! In fact, they are probably the greatest mass murderers! It’s really the great thing that they brought to us, was misery! I think ,when you think of jews in Judaism, I think what we should all think about is deception, criminality, misery and things of this nature.

So now the Simon Wiesenthal Center, which is again, brought to us by a guy [Eli Wiesel] that was a fraud, who left Auschwitz, he joined the Germans to march away from Auschwitz. He joined the column of Germans and others. And then you would think to yourself, why would a jew like anybody, march with these Germans away from the front lines, when the Russians were coming to liberate your camp? Why did Simon Wiesenthal [Eli Wiesel] do that? Why did nobody talk about the “Holocaust” in any of their memoirs? Churchill didn’t write about it. Eisenhower didn’t write about it. Nobody wrote about it! Until some many, many, years later, as jews started to gain a stranglehold on media. And, of course, they’ve always had a stranglehold, but let’s just call a larger stranglehold.

So the point here is, that when history cannot support these jewish lies. And the lies can only be supported by absolute tyrannical methods, which is basically to try to jail you, remove you from your job, destroy your family, whatever the case is, because you don’t believe in it! Folks! I’ve been there! I have dealt with this issue since the early 2000s and even before that, I was still talking about it. And I understand the way that jews go after you, and how they will try to make you a victim! And whine like a bunch of crybabies, because they don’t like what they heard.

Well now, you’ve got the Simon Wiesenthal, and I would tell the Simon Wiesenthal Center to get the hell out of my country! , because they’re joining in this intensifying, quote, unquote, “dispute” over the country’s past treatment of jews.

Look, if I am Poland, I’m going to bring up every single issue of jewish criminality within my country! I’m not going to hide the history, because I’m trying to protect Poland. I would be raising every single criminal act of the jewish people! Every single treasonous act of the jewish people! And then I would talk about how the jewish people mistreated the Poles and consequently they were treated overly fair under the circumstances.

Why on earth! Really! Why on earth should people continue to remain on the defensive in the face of an adversary who has no defense when you attack them with logic and reason? Let them! Seriously! Let the jewish people whine like a bunch of crybabies! Who cares? Keep raising the facts about their criminality! About their sadism! About their cannibalism! Whatever the case may be. Now there’s a couple of quotes here.

[33:41]

Rabbi, well it’s not a quote really, but Rabbi Marvin Hier. He’s the dean of the Simon Wiesenthal, … he’s the founder and the dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center. He cited, again get this, declassified US intelligence report, released by the organization this week that counters the Polish narrative. Nobody cares about fabricated US intel reports! Look! US intelligence, as an intelligence agency, is so fricken stupid, they sold the world on an idea of Saddam Hussein and weapons of mass destruction! They have no credibility folks!

The US intelligence community is so, is so incompetent, they can’t even solve something as obvious as 9/11! Look, we’re not interested in jews bringing out some type of document about, quote, unquote, “anti-Semitism”! They’re trying to claim that there was a thirty-three page document from 1946 describing widespread anti-Semitism in Poland, after liberation from the Nazi occupied, or the German occupation.

It states that some jews “fearing for their lives”, well who cares whether they were fearing for their lives! That’s not our business! If they want to fear for their lives, hell they fear for their lives now, when somebody says “Oy Vey” to them in the wrong tone! So who cares that these guys “fear for their lives”! How stupid do people have to be to keep reading and actually responding to this crap! Says that they:

“Sought refuge in camps for displaced people in the US zone in Germany, rather than staying.”

Yes, because the people who were coming behind were also jewish and they were some of the most sadistic, disgustingly evil people, that has ever graced planet Earth! But jews don’t want to talk about that do they! They want to hide behind their little facade of whining victimhood! Don’t they? Now, they go out there:

“What made us released documents were comments by Polish officials that there were bad Poles, just like there were a few bad jews”

Well no, there were a lot of bad jews! Jews were probably the most sinister, evil component of World War Two! And that is the part of the history that has never ever been sold, told, or acknowledged! And I think it’s time that jewish people start to acknowledge the fact that they were exceedingly evil during World War Two. They were guilty of war crimes during World War Two! They were promoting mass genocide during World War Two! They actually enacted mass genocide during World War Two! And it’s time that the jewish people start to acknowledge these crimes, and start to pay back everything they have taken from the West!

[36:42]

There’s no reason why governments in the West should continue to kowtow to this classless “group think” strategy used by the jewish people here.

They’re talking here, Jasinsacken. He’s an aide to the prime minister. He insisted, Friday, yesterday, that:

“The dispute is a misunderstanding. And that anti-Semitism exists across Europe.”

Well again, anti-Semitism should exist across Europe! If it doesn’t exist, it means that Europeans are being idiots! , because the jewish people have made it very clear to everybody that it is their intent, their motive, and their motivation, to destroy European civilization! Well, if you’re not against these people, then you’ve got something wrong with you! You need to be against the jewish people. And no amount of “anti-Semitism” as they like to call it, or anti-jew sentiment, is unjustified here! No amount! It’s all justified!

[37:49]

Folks, they are not good people! They lie, they gaslight! They do whatever they can to gain a moral advantage over the people. It says here, Hier, whose parents emigrated from Poland in the twenties, said “neither he, nor his organization is anti-Polish.” No! It’s purely jewish! Which means that if it is, quote, unquote, “jewish” and it happens to be against Poland, then they don’t have a problem with that. So again, if you are Polish and your policies happen to be against the jewish people here, hey, just leave it. It’s not anti-Semitic! Hey, were just we’re just doing our thing, man! And it’s in our interests, and hey, we don’t give a crap what you jews think anymore! That’s how it has to be. And if you don’t like it, you are a foreign element by your own definition, get the heck out of our countries!

That’s what we created Israel for! That’s what the US [Europeans] lost a hundred million people for, so that the Israelis, the jewish maniacs that run this planet, pretty much, in the West, have a place to go to.

So it says here:

“Of course, there were no Polish death camps. But any scholar tell you, that the problem of anti-Semitism in Poland had nothing to do with communism.”

Are you kidding me! Are these jews that much friggin pathetic that they got to lie to our faces like that! Everybody in the West at that time understood the pure evil of jews and their communist ideologies! It was very well-known. Everybody knew about it. So, how does Hier, some classless clown, get off gaslighting us by trying to tell us the opposite is actually true?

You see what I mean? It’s like a never-ending parade of lying to us! Straight to our face! In a form of intellectual violence, and they never, ever, even blink, about the way in which they go about lying to us.

Poland, … This guy says here. He says:

“Poland would go really far by saying ‘We didn’t murder jews, but we have to acknowledge that anti-Semitism was a serious problem in Poland.’”

Well, you know, what, it’s time for jews to admit that:

Look! You weren’t murdered in a bunch of Death Camps, so stop playing the game! And the justification for the anti-jewish sentiment in Europe was not only valid, but a necessary part of the society of that day! And that it was absolutely critical for people to hold anti-jewish sentiments, because jews were such a criminal force within these countries, within which they were staying!

It’s time for jews to start literally acknowledging their crimes, acknowledging the fact that they are anti Western! Acknowledging the fact that they are not patriotic to their people! That is absolutely what must start to happen! It’s not a one way street here, folks.

[40:50]

People should start demanding of jews, you should absolutely acknowledge all of your crimes! And you should come up with ways to compensate all of those who were victims of jewish crimes in the last century! And while we are at, it let’s talk about the Iraqis today, the American servicemen and their families, who have lost their loved ones, because of who knows what, that’s killed off [killed, or injured] half a million American servicemen since the Gulf War. Folks, all of this goes on!

We must recognize jewish terror! We must recognize that Auschwitz, Birkenau, and all of these camps were not, quote, unquote, “death camps”. They were labor camps. They were providing a safe haven for jews to hide out the war, while everybody else was dying all around them. They were swimming in swimming pools, they were working. Yeah, well I know jews, that’s a crime to make a jew work. I know that. You know, their fingernail might have broken, they are not a working class. They could never survive, if they cannot parasite seemingly over everybody else.

But look, there were no death camps, folks! And none of this is real, and really it is becoming high time that jewish people start to absolutely recognize this! I don’t want to see a wall of jews sitting out there like mug shots, showing, “look at me, were all criminals, we were all criminals and we deserve to be here.” It’s time for jews to start showing the pictures of the tens of millions of people they went out of their way and executed, murdered, etc., within our lands.

Folks we were, as Europeans, over thirty-three percent of the world’s population in the 1930s. Now, Europeans are less than ten percent. If you don’t figure out that there is an absolute campaign against Europeans to prevent births, to prevent population growth, to stifle growth, to destroy growth, and even to destroy life itself, as we’re witnessing through this mass immigration scam, ongoing in the West, then you are just really not paying attention anymore.

[43:16]

Hi everybody. Welcome back. It’s the Fetch, Inside the Eye Live. Intelligent media for the politically aware. I believe she’s now live, joining us from somewhere in the UK, Alison Chabloz. She became kind of famous by being charged with a private crime of promoting something, or other, that jews didn’t like. And I’m not exactly sure what this case is really all about, because it’s all a lot of nonsense to me!

None the less, she’s here to join us. Alison Chabloz! Welcome back!

Alison: Thank you Dennis, it’s a great pleasure to be back again.

Fetch: Yeah. I mean, you know, what I don’t like to over use my guests, you know. [Alison laughing]

I’m not, you know, and people like to listen to me, so what can I do, you know? They say Fetch don’t bring on too many guests, we want to hear you talk. [Alison laughing]

Alison: Your very good at that!

Fetch: You listen to the show, from time to time, don’t you?

Alison: Yes I do, yes I do! You’re great! You’re a wonderful radio broadcaster. Really.

Your audience should be a lot bigger.

Fetch: You know, what, I think we’re being throttled. But, you know, what the heck, you know, we’re doing the best we can, and you know, what it’s like. Real quick. You were on the show a year, or so ago, and the issue was then, you were just, I think, going to trial. Was that the case when you?

Alison: No, you interviewed me, because I was banned from Twitter. That was, I mean, I’ve been going through problems, you know, I’d lost my job and the police were investigating some unwanted deliveries sent to my home address. And I think that investigation by then it being closed. But we spoke, the issue which led to you inviting me on was that I lost my Twitter account. And I think several of us at the same time had also lost theirs. So you kept a thread of that going, having me on. But that the funny thing is, that was obviously on a Saturday, it must have been the eleventh, or twelfth of November 2016, and the next day, there was a knock on the door, the next evening, and I was arrested! And that’s when my legal problems began.

Fetch: Now, just so people who aren’t familiar, a lot of people are, because we kind of talk about your case from time to time. But really there is a non-government NGO called the, I think the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism.

Alison: Yes.

Fetch: Campaign Against Anti-Semitism, I believe it is.

Alison: Yes, a charity.

Fetch: Well, it’s a NGO. Charity, NGO, the same thing. We believe it’s funded by Israel. We can’t really say that from a fact. But we believe it’s really an Israeli front, that I think, targets really a lot of the BDS people that are trying to raise awareness about BDS and sanctioning Israel. Is that kind of true about these guys, from your understanding?

[46:23]

Alison: Yeah absolutely! And I think their objective, regarding people like me, another activist was one of their targets. Jez Turner, who you have also spoken to, I think, and had as a guest. And it’s that they want to bring about a legal precedent, which basically acts as a “Holocaust” denial law, as there is in Germany, France, etc. So that’s also there.

As well as going for the BDS, as well as, you know, trying to outlaw these boycotts of Israeli goods, etc., and to prevent the Boycott Divestment and Sanctions movement.

They also are, I think, tasked with trying to bring about a legal precedent via, mine is a test case for the moment. Jez Turners slightly different. He’s been charged under a different Act than me. But they’re going for me under the “Communications Act” to try and say that “Holocaust” denial, Revisionism, is grossly offensive. That’s how they’re trying to do it.

Fetch: What I don’t understand, and I follow some jewish logic, you hear my thing “jewish logic” which is as illogical as it gets. You have to call it “jewish logic”. And they talk about “slandering in the memory of millions”. I mean, have we reached peak stupidity within the jewish community, that they actually continue to sell that? And isn’t it about time that we the people, start to push back against this type of level of idiocy from the jewish community?

Alison: Yeah!

Fetch: What do they mean by “slandering in the memory of millions”? What a stupid thing is that! You’re going to make that a criminal offense? I mean, what type of bizarre world the jews live in where they believe this type of tyranny is even acceptable?

[48:21]

Alison: There’s so much at stake, isn’t there, with the official narrative. And the mainstream, you can forget the mainstream. They’re still pumping out the weekly press releases from the Auschwitz museum. You know, they found such and such a carving, you know, by a prisoner who suffered, and six million jews died in the gas chambers! They are still pumping it out. And I think there is a push back, but we have been corralled. And hence the draconian censorship of social media, not only Twitter, but now Google in YouTube.

Since September last year, my YouTube channel has been banned in the UK!

“This channel is no longer available. Please click here to unsubscribe.”

Can you believe that? But my channel is available in Ireland. It’s certainly available in Jordan, in Egypt, in Denmark. But my own channel with my own work on it, is not available in my own country! So desperate they are to silence me, and limit my reach. And that all began with another tweet on Twitter.

Fetch: Like you and I, mean, we are good at what we do, but our reaches is measurable. It’s not like were like some massive reach. We don’t have that, but I think perhaps, Alison, what they’re afraid of with you, and not so much me. They honestly don’t go after me too much, I don’t know why anymore. I’m starting to feel bad. It’s like maybe I’m doing something wrong. [laughing]

They just don’t bother me anymore. Like why? [chuckling] I don’t know if you heard last week, by the way, Twitter was investigating a lot of my tweets. That were raised about some of my anti-jewish rhetoric. And they came back and said we found nothing wrong people. Keep going.

What’s wrong with you guys? [laughing]

[50:21]

Alison: I mean, that is what they do all day is complain! They have the money to pay teams of dedicated flaggers! I’m sure the people who are clicking “Report” don’t even read, or watch the videos being flagged. They will be in groups, in messaging groups, etc., and there will be an order given “Report this video. Here is the link.” and they will just open the link and click “Report” without even bothering to watch the content. Richie Allen had his entire YouTube channel closed down! Now, I can consider myself lucky, my channel at least still exists!

Fetch: Yeah. And YouTube quite frankly, it’s not just regarding, I understand these jewish issues, they’re doing a lot of just nondescript, from UFOs, to body language. People done body language analysis of leading elites. They’re going out there and they’re hammering, going after everybody that doesn’t fit a very narrow definition. And you have to wonder, at some time, where’s the push-back going to come? Even from investors, you know, it’s got to be hurting the shares, in the stocks, by cutting views, cutting their advertising, etc., In other words there is more going on here and I think we’re just going to, obviously, let it play out. We have no choice, you know, we’re just going to see where it goes. But I think people really need to push back, we keep pushing for that.

Just want to cover a few more things, then we will go onto your trial here, coming up soon. But, you know, I look at some of the stuff that you used to tweet. And you used to tweet under your musical account, I believe, at one time, or yourself also.

But you would just say things like:

“It’s now widely accepted that most camp inmates died of typhus.”

That is such an innocuous statement. Yet, jews are putting this out there to be some massively evidence of denial and hatred! It’s like, what is wrong with the jewish community right now?

Alison: The jews and the liberals, the liberals as well. I had notification earlier today — there’s a group, I sometimes attend, there’s a group in London called the “Keep Talking Group”. And it’s just a discussion group. They began with talking about 9/11, and it’s moved on to other subjects. But the main Anti-fa, a Labour party front, but also a Zionist front. And it’s called “Hope Not Hate”, and they’ve managed to cancel this group! And it’s full of senior citizens! And there’s no way that any of these people are going to be, going to be creating any trouble for anybody. All they want to do is have a venue where they can invite interested people to go and discuss issues. And they’ll have a speaker who will talk on various topics.

And the excuse this time, is that they had Nick Kollerstrom, who once said that there was a swimming pool at Auschwitz. And I’ve also tweeted about that, and that too, even tweeting about soap and lampshades! Even tweeting about soap and lampshades, or singing about soap and lampshades, as the case of one of my songs which is subject to charges! That is considered to be anti-Semitic and a slander of the memory of the supposed six million.

Fetch: I hear you, but the point is, but so what?

Alison: Yes, exactly!

Fetch: You have the right to be anti-semitic.

Alison: Yes!

Fetch: Jews have a right to be anti-White and they show it every day!

Alison: They do!

Fetch: It’s like what is it about the jewish people, the insanity going on where they believe they are above any and all criticism, even when they’re rightly deserving of this criticism.

Alison: Yes, yes. It’s a whole industry, isn’t it?

Fetch: Now this all started back in 2015 with your famous quenelle salute.

Alison: Well, that was the first time my name hit the press. Prior to that, I’d lost at last one contract in Germany. I had been working for a cruise company. But yes, that’s when my name hit the headlines, with my quenelle salute, at the Edinburgh Festival. When my accusers didn’t want my show to go ahead, but the Edinburgh Fringe at that point said:

“Oh, we are the Edinburgh Fringe and she has the right to her freedom of expression. Therefore she can continue.”

The organizers had very kindly informed me of these letters trying to get my show banned. That was my response, I just tweeted a photograph of myself on Twitter with a nice quenelle.

Fetch: Now at the end of the day, come on! This is a silly picture and they make this out to be like the second coming of Joseph Stalin, or something! [Alison laughs] what do they mean by it. It’s like a silly little pose, at the end of the day!

Alison: Yes, yes.

Fetch: I mean, silly little pose at the end of the day! It’s just a pose! And they make it be this massive symbolic thing that’s worthy of going after and destroying people! They have to just, really, again! What is wrong with the jewish community, right now?

Alison: One of the top jews in France, Ala Yakubawitz, is his name, he said that the quenelle was symbolic of the sodomization of the victims of the Shoah! [laughing]

Fetch: Well, that’s a heck of a vivid imagination there! [Alison laughing like hell]

I would have to dig deep to come up with that imagery and put that on the air.

Alison: And then you have the double standards, you know, you have the French, this is in the case of the French political activist Alan Savale, is his name, going to the Berlin “Holocaust” memorial, you know, this horrible and ugly, slabs of concrete stones.

Fetch: An abomination!

Alison: Yes. And he made a quenelle salute in there. And he’s been fined so far about 30,000 euros for defaming the memory of the victims of the Shoah. But you get Israelis going there, so-called BDS Israelis going there, and doing even more obscene things. Which I won’t go into here. But not being subjected to any consequences, at all! So there’s this double standards, as well, in the way that certain figures are attacked, whereas others seem to be able to cause gross offense with impunity!

Fetch: Again, “gross offense” is so innocuous, it doesn’t mean anything. At the end of the day, unless it’s “jewish logic” from logic, it doesn’t mean anything. I don’t know how we are allowing as a people, to allow this stupidity to prosper within our country! What does this even mean?

[57:29]

Alison: I think that the shoah and the memory of the shoah that’s pumped, continually pumped, at us by the media, and these memorial days, and the ever increasing “Holocaust” memorial sites around the world. Museums. There’s a new one going to be built in London, right next to our Houses of Parliament!

You know, that’s the way they can start indoctrinated children at an early age with school trips, etc., When I was at school we didn’t go and visit Auschwitz. But I think it’s a pretty much par for the course now. You know, you get to these cheap flights. Day flights in and out of Poland and the children are taken around Auschwitz! And the “Holocaust” education begins in primary school now! It’s not just high school! It begins at an early age!

Fetch: They have that in America too.

Alison: Yeah, they use this myth, they use this myth, which is the foundation myth of the world we are living in and today, to create these liberal, good, democratic citizens.

“Oh racism! We can’t be having any racism”, “we know what leads to racism! It begins with name calling, and leads straight to the gas chambers at Auschwitz!”

So you can’t be racist! And you’ve got to remember the victims of the shoah. So it’s not only used to fortify the jewish angle of things, that jews are above criticism., but it’s also used to reinforce globalism and the globalist agenda of creating the world of endless tyranny and slavery for us all.

Fetch: Have you been in touch with anybody from the Monika Schaefer camp?

Alison: Yes, yes.

Fetch: Do, you know, what’s going on with case?

Alison: Well, I think she’s in good spirits.

Fetch: Is she still in jail?

Alison: Yes, she’s still in jail. She’s still awaiting trial now. I think that they can only keep her for six months.

Fetch: Only?

Alison: If there’s no reason to bring her to trial, … Yes, only! If there’s no reason to bring her to trial at that point, then I think that they are obliged to release her. I mean, she’s kept up, she’s held on remand as a flight risk, because she’s not a German citizen.

Obviously she’s of German origin, and she speaks the language. Imagine if you were in a German prison and you didn’t speak the language! And it must be the case with Middle Easterners, etc., But for an educated Western woman, who’s absolutely delightful and charming. But she’s in good spirits.

I’ve heard that she’s in a cell with three other German, well three other ladies. Three other women, not sure of their nationality, could be anything [one was White and the other two, Nigerians]. And she’s keeping fit. She can paint, and draw. She certainly in good spirits, and she’s certainly not having her spirit broken by this. And I think Alfred, her brother, is right in saying that this will further increase public awareness and be in our favor. They always go too far. And this isn’t just one more example of how they do that. Shooting themselves in their own foot. For a video where she apologizes to her own mother! There’s absolutely nothing hateful about this! Nothing!

[61:00]

Fetch: Just apologizing to your mother!

Alison: Yes!

Fetch: It’s like, I’ll be honest it’s like, I’ve given up trying to figure out what motivates those people.

Alison: Well, even the lawyers admit, you know, the truth is no defense! They know but the system is just so corrupt! So utterly corrupt! That even the top judges in Germany have said this, with the Horst Mahler case, in particular, this law is an ass!

Fetch: Yes, it’s an embarrassment to the German people, which are a proud people. They’re allowing themselves to be made fools of, quite frankly. In the public eyes, global eyes here, because how can you guys be that stupid? You’re proud people! And here we look at you prosecuting things in a way that truly makes you look like a laughingstock and a blight upon Western civilization! And that’s a sad situation.

[61:56]

Alison: Yes. I would like to see some big public outcry over this. There’s also this young Palestinian teenager who slapped a soldier, Ahed Tamine, who is now in prison in an Israeli jail.

Fetch: I think they have taken out fifteen of her family members last week.

Alison: This girl she slapped a soldier in an illegally military occupied zone, and they banged her up! And, of course, there’s no question that’s unjustifiable!

Fetch: You know, they shot her cousin in the head. Did you know, that?

Alison: Yeah, yes!

Fetch: But then, you know, what the story was? “Oh, he fell off his bike!”

Like you guys have become a level of evil I just can’t get my mind around.

Alison: They are evil, they are truly evil!

You know, there’s a Muslim human rights organization, Islamic, you know, the name’s “Inmines”. And they organized, it was a great “guerilla projection” they called it. A great initiative. They projected, they used a projector and they beamed onto the facade of the Houses of Parliament in London, great photographs “Free Ahmed Tamimi” and they did this group guerilla presentation. Of course, the press completely ignored it. But there were lots of people there, and they took photos. And I think we should do something similar.

Fetch: Do you find that the Palestinian advocate segment of the culture is actually much more affective than we are ourselves, in combating the issue relative to Israel and human rights?

Alison: Well I think this particular initiative impressed me! I thought yes, you know, why aren’t we doing the same for our own political prisoners? A young man, twenty-two, twenty-three years old, who said something unwise on social media, and has been locked up for two, or three years of their lives! Of their young lives, in the prime of their youth!

Why aren’t we coming together and organizing for these political prisoners? Yes! I think the Palestinian movement does do good work, but they need to be more vocal. I mean, I and others, and Gilad Atzmon, we think that, you know, a lot of the pro-Palestinian organizations have been taken over by jews! And these people who claim to be anti-Zionists, are, in fact, still Zionists! And still “Oh yes, Israel, blah, blah, blah, and the Holocaust”.

So yes, I think there is a possibility for us to join together and talk about racial issues, talk about national nationalist issues. But for the moment I think we have to concentrate on our own people and our Western governments. And opposing this tyranny.

[64:58]

Fetch: When I first met Graham Hart, he was really pro-Palestinian — he’s listens to this, so Graham don’t shoot me — but he was very pro Palestinian when I first met. I told him exactly what you said there. No, I think we need to spend more time on our own issues, and what is Palestine is Palestine. We have enough of our own issues to worry about. To just always “Palestine”!

Alison: We are all Palestinians now! We are all in “occupied territories” here in the West! Britain is occupied! Germany is occupied! France is occupied!

Fetch: Right.

Alison: The States they still have the First Amendment, but they’re going after that.

Fetch: Alison, what have you learned, really? , because you’re kind of late to this, but you’re also obviously having a court case brought against you, makes you become very focused, very fast. But what have you learned over the last few years now? From the time when you were just doing it, like most of us, doing our thing out there, not really paying attention. To now being in the spotlight and having to confront this power that a lot of people want to try to deny even exists. What have you learned about this? This Israeli infiltration of our nations and the type of tactics they use. What have you learned?

[66:23]

Are you there? What a great question, and she disappeared off the radar screen.

Fetch: Alt-Right everybody, welcome back. It’s a Fetch Inside the Eye Live. Intelligent media for the politically aware. A lot of funny things happening with Skype. Not sure exactly what’s happened to Alison. Are you still on the air?

Alison: Yes, yes. Did we get cut you off?

Fetch: Yeah. Here’s what’s happened, your contact has disconnected from my network, which means you would have to re-approve my contact request for you to actually communicate through IM, but I’m glad to hear you’re still on the air, so that’s a great thing.

Come on man, Skype, who know people I’m not a conspiracy guy about this stuff, you know, computers do wacky things. Before we went in the break I was asking a quick question. You were never into the nationalist side of things, you are an entertainer, you were doing your gigs, you’re on your cruises, pretty much minding your own business. Is that kind of a fair statement?

Alison: Yes, yes.

Fetch: And then all the sudden you find yourself being targeted for unknown reasons, obvious you have to look into why. You start to understand why. But now that you have a court case being brought against you, which is a very serious issue in any situation. What have you learned about this power structure that target citizens in our nations, that’s really a foreign power? What have you learned that you might share with some of the audience, about this power structure?

Alison: Well, they have the means, immeasurable fundamental ng to be able to carry out what they do. Do what they do.

Before I got cut off, I was realizing that I was cut off, I was saying that, … I’ve learned that everything I learned growing up was a child, … my grandfather was a soldier in the British Army and he was killed aged 23 in 1940. And I think he was, you know, like many of the others, thinking that they were going to war — propagandized by the powers that be — into fighting for the glory of this country!

And that if he knew, if he’d survived and became aware of the fact that, no, he was, in fact, fighting for the establishment of the Cudenhove Kalergi Plan, and the foundation of the Greater Israel, then I think he would have had remorse about going in there and fighting these brothers wars! I always learned:

“Oh, your grandfather sacrifice was to ensure that we can enjoy the liberties of Western civilization!”

But it’s just not true! Western civilization, yes it’s supposed to be founded on open debate, honesty, honour, duty, these pillars of Western civilization. But it’s just not true! And it was learning about the plight of people like Horst Mahler, Ursula Haverbeck, Sylvia Stolz, now Monika Schaefer, of course, Professor Faurisson in France. That these people are being silenced via legal means! And it’s not just the intimidation. Many of them have also suffered. The professor’s been beaten up ten times by people who are connected with the militant jewish organizations, Defense League type organizations. But they’re also using the law. They are also able to buy our corrupt, vain, greedy politicians to the extent where these politicians basically betray their own country and their own people!

[70:14]

Fetch: When you hear a lot of the arguments brought against you, you know, and they’re the same thing we’ve all received over time. But they talk about how this idea of diversity, diversity, diversity! And being tolerant of others. But I think what we’re now learning and people are grasping, is that these people aren’t tolerant to even one ounce of a pound, or a quarter of an inch! These guys have zero tolerance for anybody but their own views, don’t they?

Alison: Yes! And that’s the double standards Dennis! I was looking around the other day. I thought okay, well, you know, there are saying that my songs, for the listeners, I’m on trial for three songs that I uploaded to the internet. My own compositions. And two of these songs I take jewish melodies, which are parodies and, of course, I change the words, I wouldn’t sing in Hebrew, no thank you!

But I looked on the internet for parodies of Christmas carols. Not your Rudolph the Red nosed Reindeer, I’m talking about religious Christian, Christmas carol music. And I found an American acapella act going by the name of “Paint” and it’s progressive Christmas carols. And it’s the usual stuff, you know, some of it might be okay. I didn’t find it particularly funny, but at one point, they imply, quite specifically, that Jesus was gay! Now, I find that quite offensive, to be honest.

Fetch: I’m not even, …

Alison: If a legal precedent is set with my case, then will it be possible for devout Christians to also cite this section one twenty-seven of the Communications Act for causing gross offense for things like this?

Fetch: I think the British people should en masse go after every single jewish person for this! You know, you make it a nightmare for the jewish people, because that’s what they’re looking to do. So okay, once they put it in motion, use it against them, because that’s the fastest way they will appeal it.

Alison: [laughing] Yes! You know, using jewish tunes, my goodness! What a crime! We have a stabbing every day in London, every day somebody is killed via stabbing!

And the drug dealing! And the theft! And not to mention all the terror plots, this, that and the other. Goodness me, going after a singer, really what, … [laughing]

My grandfather, to think that he was fighting for that? So that singers could be brought to trial for their parodies of jewish tunes! Did he think that he was fighting so that gay couples can adopt children? That’s the Jonathan Bowden quote, by the way, that is not come from me. But I really don’t think that the people who fought in the Second World War if they could see what’s happening today see that they would be impressed at all! And they wouldn’t consider that they won!

[73:25]

Fetch: How long has your trial been going on, from the time they, it went from a private prosecution, which is absurd, to a public prosecution. How long have you been now dealing with this headache?

Alison: Well I’ve been dealing with it since we last spoke! So that’s fifteen months, going on sixteen months!

Fetch: It’s that long, since you were here!

Alison: Eight, or nine court hearing for a summary, it’s a summary offense, under the communications Act for “sending”. There’s also this, you know, what did I “send”? I didn’t “send” my music to these individuals who are complaining! I simply posted a link uploaded to YouTube. They went and sought out these links themselves! There’s even one of the songs that’s been sand-boxed on YouTube.

They were all played in court last month, and the first day of my trial, which was very bizarre. And the sand-boxing “Are you sure you want to continue to watch this video” well, they know it’s me, you know. Why are they clicking on this song? Clearly it’s, because they want me locked up! They want me clamped in irons, Dennis! And made an example of!

Fetch: Did you have a lot of chuckles when they played it in the courtroom?

Alison: Yes! Yes, it was quite surreal for me to be sitting there in the dock.

Fetch: Now, just to set the record straight. You did not sing your song in the dock?

Alison: No! No I did not!

Fetch: So the Daily Mail and all these mainstream publications are just lying through their teeth?

Alison: They lie! They lied in unison! It was quite an experience! These songs are my babies, Dennis, you know, they have, they are part of me. They come from me! So to see my performances that I’ve not been allowed to share, or promote over the past eighteen months. I’ve been gagged on bail. I can’t share them.

To see these songs being played in court, especially the two videos from the London Forum, which was in front of a live audience, who were all cheering and laughing and clapping at the end. It was quite surreal! Quite something! Yes, the public gallery, they applauded after the first song was played. But the judge told them off! That they shouldn’t be doing that again.

Fetch: A lot of people may think that this is really personnel wise, a really big thing, right? But the truth of the matter is, this is just a couple of good, to me, okay? I can’t speak for you, but for me as an outside observer, a couple jewish thugs, basically. Trollish thugs, who have been empowered with the money to go after somebody. They decided you were one they were going to go after. And that’s it! There’s no other real issue here, is there? It’s just two of these thugs making a complaint! And again, that is not you speaking, that’s me as an outside observer looking at what’s going on. You’ve got the presiding district Judge, John Zane, is he still there?

Alison: Yes, yes, yes.

Fetch: No jury. Karen Robinson, she’s your prosecuting counsel. Adrian Davies is with you, correct?

Alison: Yes, yes.

Fetch: Then you’ve get Giddeon Falter the chairman of the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism and Stephen Silverman, who’s the director of quote, unquote, “Investigations and Enforcement”! What a stupid thing that sounds like! And, well, who is he to enforce anything?

Alison: Exactly!

Fetch: You know, I mean, who’s he to be enforcing anything? This is almost like, dude! You know, in America maybe, you know, I don’t want to say, but my goodness! You come at people like that in America, they may not be tolerant of you!

[77:11]

Alison: Well, one of my theories, you know, music is a powerful tool, a powerful language. And I think, someone said to me:

“Your songs are doing more than any textbook that’s ever been written on the subject.”

Because it is a heavy subject, the “Holocaust”. And yes, it might well offend certain sensibilities, but that’s subjective. It’s on their part. Lots of things offend me! I don’t have friends high up in the House of Commons, or in the police to go and complain constantly and whine about these things. And life’s too short, you know!

Fetch: Offence is nothing! It’s subjective. I’m offended that this guy actually believes that he should be in charge of “investigations and enforcement” against a private individual! I’m offended by that! Should he be in trial? Absolutely then! , because he’s going after the rights of the British people.

Alison: Yes!

Fetch: That’s highly offensive! And people should treat him in this way.

Alison: Well, I think they have lost credibility, not only among the public at large, and among the politicians, and the police, etc., But among the jewish community. That’s how it seems to me.

Fetch: And it should be!

Alison: The clever jews know that, you know, that they’ve, … my lawyer said under cross-examination of these two witnesses, that:

“If you’d have left her alone she’d have been with her handful of followers, doing her thing. Nobody would have heard more. But you have created this publicity around her by bringing this prosecution! You made her into a minor celebrity!”

And it’s true. Now, I think they’re trying to retract. They complained to police about “Survivors” [song] the day that I uploaded it to the Internet! They reported me to police!

Fetch: Isn’t them telling the police, they’re obsessing over you?

Alison: I think so. But they applied so much pressure. The poor Police and Crime Commissioner, he had three letters a week from the Silverman, trying to get me locked up, which they didn’t manage. They did eventually manage to get me locked up for two days last October, for this other song that I’m now charged with it.

I don’t know, perhaps they were also afraid of my influence, because I’m a fluent French speaker and they and, of course, the revisionism movement pretty much began in France with the work of Professor Faurrison. They knew that I was in contact with him. They considered him to me to be somebody specifically dangerous for their “foundation myth” of the shoah. Which is, you know, the religion of today, that one is not allowed to commit sacrilege, or heresy against these ridiculous lies. And it’s not as if my songs attack that particularly, they attack the lies of those survivors who have been debunked as such!

Fetch: This is very true.

Alison: But it’s fine for others, for liberals, to go out there and denigrate our Christian heritage, Christmas carols, our sacred music, and have millions of views on YouTube. Not get sand-boxed, be able to monetize their work. Yet we are not allowed to do that. So yes, they can become quite crucify us, but they can try their best to crucify us socially and professionally speaking!

Fetch: Well, of course, they have done that, but at the same time, I mean, this is going to happen. If not you, somebody else, unfortunately.

Alison: Yes.

Fetch: So it’s just a matter of people taking a stand, which to your credit you have taken this stand. I can’t stand when people apologize!

Alison: Oh no! Oh no, I won’t be making any groveling apology! And I don’t really need to. I don’t have any assets, such as to speak of but they will go to any lengths. They will continue, whatever happens on Wednesday.

Fetch: Last time we had thirty some odd, according to a caller from Scotland, who came down to support you. We’d like it more. I know Graham Hart has made a big robust statement out there. I told him that’s a little bit much, but we’d still like to get a lot of people. How do people get to this, … well first of all, let’s go back to the first day. The first trial was what? The prosecution presenting it’s case about a month, or so ago?

Alison: Yes.

Fetch: What was interesting about that, or can you talk about that? What was interesting about the way the case was presented by them?

[82:08]

Alison: There’s been a couple of interesting articles one was written by Dr Kollestrom again, Nick Kollestrom, which was published on the Occidental Observer and on the Unz Review. And that the prosecution doesn’t really have any evidence to prove one, that I broke any laws, because there’s still this “sending” issue. The “sending”, well is posting a link to the Internet, can that be construed as “sending” under this particular law? And secondly, neither of the prosecution witnesses really had any evidence to prove that I offended anybody, except them!

They talked about Irene Zisblatt, for example, and the chief witness Gideon Faulter, admitting that he had not even read this woman’s book! [The Fifth Diamond] So he’s trying to defend somebody, but he’s not even bothered to read her book!

It was quite amazing I have to say. Just sit there and listen to, they were reading from a script.

Fetch: At the end of the day, they are trolls and clowns! Let’s be honest. You’re not very, … they went after me, by the way, after you came on my show.

Alison: Yes.

Fetch: They did! They went after me, and I made some complaints to my circles and said:

“Hey, you need to, you better back off dude! Because, you know, it’s not just you running this world.”

And so they disappeared. They didn’t challenge it to beyond about thirty hours.

Alison: Yes. Well they want a law here. They know they’re never going to have a chance to have a similar rule in Jordan. But they will, that’s what they want here in the UK, you see. They’re not bothered about somebody singing quote “anti-Semitic” unquote songs anywhere else. They want to set a precedent here, in the UK. That is their, … and yeah the trolling, this guy.

Fetch: They are trolling, they are trolling right?

Alison: That was the most interesting thing as well, the most significant thing I think, of my trial in January, was this Nemo guy, “Sekara72” who was the one who had me banned from Twitter. But later on it was found out that it wasn’t he who had me banned, it was the Community Security Trust, which is the main jewish NGO in the UK. They admit on their own website, they admitted on Twitter that they worked to have me removed from Twitter! So it’s not as if I’ve broken any Twitter rules. This is the Community Security Trust.

Fetch: That’s an important sounding name.

Alison: Yes, they’re a long running body that supposed to, …

Fetch: Basically, the main jewish NGO there, has admitted to targetting British citizens?

Alison: Yeah! Yeah! Not me, I’m not the only one in this case.

Fetch: They are targetting British citizens. That’s it.

Alison: Yes!

Fetch: Targetting! Admitted to targetting British citizens.

Alison: Yes! Yes! Hasbara trolls who get suspended, the same organization will then work to have these hasbara trolls unsuspended from Twitter. [laughing] It really is that absurd! And I think that they are panicking. To some to some extent, they are panicking. They know that we are reaching, what’s the term, the point of no return, when our ideas will simply gain strength, while it.

Fetch: Come on! We are everywhere now. The dam has already broken! There’s leaks so far out there now, it’s not even it’s, … I can’t categorize it, quite frankly. If I go into Twitter now, I’m still there thankfully. What happened to Facebook? Were you blocked on Facebook also again?

Alison: Yes! Yes, yes.

Fetch: Well what did you do there?

Alison: For, oh, some fake news post that I’d shared. So yes, that was the day after my trial, so I was unable to share all the wonderful news coverage about me, supposedly singing in the dock.

Fetch: What were some of the great, well, what are some of the positives you’ve taken so far, out of what’s happened?

Alison: Can I just come back to that the significant thing of the trial.

Fetch: Sure, absolutely.

[86:32]

Alison: It ties in. The guy who did get me banned from Twitter, we discovered with the help of a long working, dedicated colleague, that this man is, in fact, a journalist, a freelance writer and film critic, going by the name of Steven Applebaum. And he writes for the jewish Chronicle. He wrote for the jewish Chronicle, an article about my quenelle salute in 2015. And he was the one, along with this Silverman character, who was trolling me, to the point of 500 tweets to me over the space of a few months. He was the one, he was the one, that was trolling me the most.

And one of these songs is about him! At that point his name was “Nemo” on Twitter. And I wrote one of the songs called, “Nemo’s Anti-semitic Universe”. So that will be interesting to hear the cross-examination of me, because that’s what’s going on next Wednesday. Of course, I’m the one that will be in the witness-box, presumably. Anything could happen, and it usually does.

Fetch: Are you going to the stand in your own defense?

Alison: Yes. Yes.

Fetch: It’s great! For people who want to come out and support you. What should they do?

Alison: Well, if they want to come to London, the court is the Westminster Magistrates. Central London Magistrates Court on Marylebone road. And the nearest train station is Marylebone. And there’s a tube there as well. And there’s another one at Edgeware Road, tube station. Good to be there at nine thirty. There’s a little security check before you go in. There will be quite a number of supporters who will be there outside court, waiting already, I presume, I suppose. There may be some media there, so for people who don’t want to be recognized, wear a hat and a pair of sunglasses! I’m not sure what the weather’s going to be like, but thankfully the snow’s melted.

And if people can’t come along, to just have a quick look at my blog. Leave a message there, leave a comment under one of my articles. That is Alison Chabloz dot wordpress dot com. And there’s also links where you can find my Pay Pal, Bit Coin, etcetera., for people who would like to leave a small donation to help me, get by!

Because, you know, that’s the thing. It’s been going on for so long! Will it be all over on Wednesday? I have doubts! Now will the judge reserve his decision and that will mean another month, or six weeks, still on bail. I’m still hoping.

Fetch: How it is this judge? Is he fair, or do you to think he’s really, …

Alison: Well I think so. When the second song was played, the “Anti-Semitic Universe” song. “Nemo’s Anti-semitic Universe”, the last verse, there’s a, it’s very pro-Palestinian. It’s:

“Zionists will flee, everybody will agree, from the river to the sea. Palestine will be Free! Free Palestine!”

And if that isn’t fair comment, I don’t know what it is. But, of course, the Crown witnesses were claiming that was an incitement to genocide all jews! So I think the judge, you know, I can’t really say more than more than that, but he seems to want to be a fair man.

[90:05]

When I was arrested and in court in the beginning of October, I think he was quite upset about that, as well. And the way that I was treated, like a common criminal for having, for singing songs. Yeah, it’s caused quite a lot of uproar. And no, the press has said nothing about this Applebaum character, who was trolling me relentlessly for two years, pretty much. They said nothing about this. It was all “Chabloz was singing in the dock!” There’s no surprise there. There’s no surprise that the press would take this angle, but it will be interesting to see what will happen on Wednesday. Will there be an outcome? And if not, you know, how the press going to spin things this time.

Fetch: How many seats are available inside the court?

Alison: Forty seats perhaps.

Fetch: So that we should know that everybody, and then get a crowd outside to take pictures of the media.

Alison: Yes! [laughing]

Fetch: Really! Take pictures of the media. I recommend it, because they’re the ones promoting this. To make them feel some heat.

Alison: Yes. Get down there! Get down there and show them! Show the authorities! It was a private prosecution! And then that the Crown took over, because that was a request from my team, that the Crown take over the charges. They didn’t take over that original charge. They brought new charges. Similar but different, because, …

Fetch: Why would a country being involving themselves in the stupidity?

Alison: Well I think it’s lobbying isn’t it? And the donations to political parties in this case, Theresa May, just a few weeks, or a couple of weeks before I was in court the first time, that was at the end of 2016, December 2016. The government “adopted”. Adopted — why they didn’t legislate — they adopted this international definition of “anti-semitism”. This awful definition which says, oh! :

“We can’t have ‘Holocaust’ denial on any media platform.”

You know, we are silenced, we are corralled, but with the Internet they are limited to the extent that, … and who believes the mainstream media? Who believes what they say? And who believes what government says?

Fetch: I tell you what, governments are putting themselves in the position what they look really childish! Seriously! This is the most childish display and abuse of power that I’ve seen in a long time. You’re a singer at the end of the day, Alison! You’re nothing! I don’t see you’re nothing, but in the realm of criminality, this is about as nothing as it gets! [Alison laughs] And what are you doing bringing charges like this for?

Alison: And this is the Conservative Party under Theresa May, and yes, eighty percent of the conservative members of parliament are “friends of Israel”. But it’s the same with the Labor Party! So even if May gets chucked out, it will still be the same with under the Labor party! We really need complete change.

Fetch: We’re out of time. Sorry to part with you Alison.

Alison: Thanks very much Dennis.

Fetch: All right everybody, we will get that out and get your web sites out. It’s Alison Chabloz everybody! Again get out to the Westminster courthouse on Wednesday the 7th [of March].

[94:02]

All right everybody, welcome back. It’s the Fetch, Inside the Eye Live. Intelligent media for the politically aware. Today’s March the 3rd, 2018. I want to thank Alison Chabloz for making an hour available to us. You know, she’s got the court case again coming up. She’ll be on the witness stand. Should be a very interesting time. So guys, everybody get out there that’s listening in the UK! Again this isn’t just about Alison. This is really about the thug, and again, this is my observation, because I know this will get back to certain people, so we’re going to phrase it in a very clear way. This is about, from clear observable observation, from a basic human perception, a couple of thugs, who wear a yarmulke, decided to go after and target somebody that, for whatever reason they don’t like. And if this isn’t tantamount to an exceedingly, oh, let’s call it an ostentatious display, how’s that for flowery words for you? But an exceedingly ostentatious display of bullying by people within the jewish community! I really don’t know what is. I mean, that’s exactly what was happening here.

Can you imagine, … I can feel for Alison, because I was trolled by some of the meanest, nastiest trolls that ever graced this planet! For years and years! So I can relate to some moron in the jewish community trolling me for five, six, just on, and on, and on, and on. I can get it! And you have to understand that when, and we don’t advocate trolling here. We think it’s a disgusting display of human interaction here. So we don’t really, we don’t condone it, by any stretch. You make your points, you get out! Make your points, get out! Not this constant droning of idiocy that is this troll world. Look, make your points, get out! Make your points, get out! But when you’re subjected to all this massive trolling, why is it that you can troll a politician that is jewish and you find yourself getting hauled into court for harassment!

But jews believe it’s more than morally acceptable to troll for a year, or more, because they think that you’re, quote, unquote, a “denier”. What a bunch of idiots, are we dealing with here? And we need to start calling it that guys! Look! There’s a time to grow up out there, when it comes to dealing with these types of clowns!

You know, if you look at some of the comments coming from the jewish community and why you should get out there. One of the things they said is something like, this comes on a Facebook post, and it is, let’s see if I can find it quick enough for you. You think I would be able to. I just had it. The name is jewish, Tim De Rosen. He writes in a post he said, obviously Mr De Rosen has to be obsessed here, to even bother, quite frankly, to go on to somebody Facebook page and comment. What an obsessed little jackass clown this guy is! That’s the facts guys! But his name is Tim De Rosen, and he says:

“There is no point in prosecuting this woman. She is clearly insane.”

Well, you know, what Mr Rosen, you’re an insane freak moron, quite frankly! And for you jews out there, to consistently try to consolidate, or define the reality for us, we’re sick of you clowns! I’m serious! The last thing I want to see is some a hate filled bigot like Tim De Rosen. Yeah that’s using their language everybody! Telling me what is, is not, acceptable out there! Look there’s nothing acceptable in the jewish community!

They’re out there celebrating right now, “Purim”! The mass slaughter of some 85,000 Persians, for no other reason than that jews were, people hated the jews! Whatever that’s supposed to mean. Don’t give us this idea what’s insane, dude! You’re sitting there celebrating Purim! You’re out there celebrating the mass slaughter of tens of thousands of people! And you’re going to tell us you’re sane! Are you kidding! Are you fricken out of your mind dude! And it’s that way across the entire jewish spectrum. These guys continue to want to just pop off with a lot of chutzpah, with a lot, a lot, a lot of gaslighting against us! And we’re supposed to actually take these people seriously?

[98:49]

No! You need to learn to push back guys! Put them back into some type of defensive mode! Stop being on the defensive here! Make them go into the defensive mode. Make them support why they are such flaming lunatics within our midst! And how they continue to insult and assault us with their stupidity, time, and time, again! They’re not smart people, folks! These are idiots! At the bottom end of the spectrum of the human scale, these are idiots! They’re not intellectual people by any stretch! Come on, the Committee Against Anti-Semitism, what a bunch of morons! Seriously! You come after me. You want to go complain to my people, you know, what? Try to come into certain areas, maybe we arrest these guys. These guys are clowns. They’re disgusting vile elements of human existence here. They want to sit there and try to oppress the rest of us, because what? They’re jews? Well, go back to Israel dude! Seriously! That’s why we all died. That is why our relatives died for you, so you can have your fricken place called Israel. Go! Go! Get out!

That’s my observation, as an outside observer. And it’s not people like Alison Chabloz that are promoting hatred! The people that are promoting hatred are this Mr Silverman, who wants to go after me for what? Dude you want to go after me, and you don’t think you’re not the one promoting hatred? Believe me dude, you want to go after us professionally, we have every right to find you loathsome and to go after you, and to hate you, and to do whatever we feel like doing on a rhetorical scale towards you! Because, you know, what? Who are you to go after us professionally all the time? No, we need to go after these guys professionally. We need to mock them! We need to scoff them! We need to make them feel like outcasts, in our own lands, so that they get the heck out!

And it’s a mass consciousness here. It’s not like just one person it’s cumulative. It’s death by a thousand cuts! Don’t keep allowing these people to always be on the offensive. This trial has got to be one of the dumbest childish things I’ve ever seen! Really! It is absolutely childish to watch these people operate out there! They actually think that, because they’re jews, they can just go ahead and target anybody they want for the dumbest of things! How do you wear “stupid” on your shoulder? You put a star David on your forehead! Is that what jews are trying to tell us here?

Mr Silverman, if you are listening, than you just might be, because I know you’re very obsessed right now with what’s going on. Dude! Where is that Star of David? Where is that symbol of hatred? Is it on your butt, or is on your forehead? Where is it dude?

See, we don’t hate anybody until you start to make a jackass out of yourself and then expect us to tolerate you! That’s the problem with the jewish community right now. They go out of their way to make complete moronic jackasses of themselves, and then they expect us to just stand by and say, :

“Oh you jews! You’ve just got so much chutzpah!”

“Oh! Let me worship your little finger nails, because they’re worth more than a thousand of us!”

No, we get it everybody! We are really starting, to really understand this idea of jewish hatred for Western civilization.

You know, there’s lots of comments over the years about Alison. And it’s not just Alison. It’s about a lot of us out there, who discuss a lot of these particular issues. And they always throw out this idea that you hate jews! And I’m like okay, well what’s wrong with that? Because what you’re telling me is you just made a judgment against me, not knowing me. You’re a fricken clown! Okay, I hate jews, so what! Are you telling me you like me? Do you love me? Are you going to worship me tomorrow? Otherwise you hate me too! So what’s the problem with you? Are you trying to tell me that your form of hate is different from my form of hate?

Look! Finish with these rhetorical games that we see continually see being played out there. How they use these words, weaponized words, to put people on the defensive! Look, being antagonistic towards other people is natural! Whether you like to believe it, or not. Trust me! It’s natural! I’ll give you an example over here in the Middle East. We have something on his cliques of Somalians out there. You cannot deal with them. You cannot rationalize with them. You cannot even, it’s hard to even socialize with them.

But, you know, there’s no reason for me to have to tolerate it. There’s no reason for me to kiss up and, “You guys are awesome!” And, you know, what? They’re often scheming against you, behind your back. This is normal behavior folks, within the human scale. Not everybody is enlightened. Not everybody has an open mind that allows them to work trans-culturally. This is normal. But when you meet particular ethnic groups out there, who do go out of their way to target other ethnic groups. Then the targeted ethnic group has every right, duty, and obligation see to go and defend themselves! That’s called human nature. That is what builds nations. That is what keeps different countries always at each other’s throats, because their views are such that they are never going to be able to work together!

And until they can work through these issues, that’s just the way human nature works. It’s not for enemies within your midst to define for you what is the moral battle ground upon which you will wage your wars! Look if you’re going to wage a war against a quote, unquote, a “semitic” mindset, understand it’s total war, one hundred percent of the time!

It is total war, one hundred percent of the time!

That means that they have no morals! They have no values! Have no ethics! It is whatever they can do to win the war! There’s no idea of Western chivalry out there! Not the Westerners have been all that chivalrous over their history outside their world. But there is this level still within our mindset of chivalry. It doesn’t exist when you’re dealing with these jewish constructions!

Look! They’re going after a singer for Christ’s sake! A singer! Who sang a song about a bunch of discredited “Holocaust” writers, who are a bunch of idiots on the scale of human existence here!

C’mon, Simon Wiesenthal, what a moron! Seriously! His story is pathetic! As are so many of these jewish quote, unquote “survivor” stories.

[96:00]

[Program continues, mostly on other topics]

[143:00]

END

============================================

PDF Notes

Version 1 —

• Total words = xxx
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xx

(Available later)

Version History

Version 4:

Version 3: Mar 24, 2020 — Re-uploaded images for katana17.com/wp/ version.

Version 2: Mar 9, 2018 — Added description from Inside the Eye website. Fixed some typos.

Version 1: Mar 6, 2018 — Published post. Total minutes proofed = 106. Added 18 images.

[Henrik of Red Ice Radio interviews Canadian-German activist Alfred Schaefer on the situation surrounding his sister’s arrest on Jan 3 this year, in Germany, for making a video called “Sorry Mom, I Was Wrong About the Holocaust“.

Part of the subversion of Whites has been achieved through the diabolical lie known as the “Holocaust” that is used by organized jewry as a “shield and sword” to draw attention away from its massive crimes against humanity, such as the instigation of the World Wars, 9/11, etc., while also instilling guilt and shame in Whites for their very existence.

Alfred is a tireless and impassioned “man on a mission” to alert all to the reality of our dire situation and the forces behind our looming racial and cultural destruction, if we fail to act! I would urge all readers to support Alfred in his work and to help him in exposing the Orwellian situation that his sister, Monika, finds herself in as a “thought criminal“, now locked up in a maximum security prison in Germany.

In Part 2 here (Part 1 is here), Henrik explains his thinking on how Red Ice should present such taboo topics as Revisionist material, and the role of organized jewry in our racial and cultural destruction, that Alfred discusses. Since Red Ice has a large and growing audience on YouTube, Henrik rightly concludes that despite wanting to get the truth out, they must avoid getting banned by YouTube by publishing certain material discussed here in the members section.

Alfred then talks about the use of “control words“, such as “extreme right wing“, “racist“, “anti-semitism“, etc., by our enemies to frame the debate in their favour. Organized jewry through its media domination have been relentless lying to us for the purpose of effectively genociding the White race through mass invasion of non-Whites, miscegenation and other means to drive the Whites into minority status.

He then talks about how the advert of digital technology has enable us to reclaim history and expose the lies that we have been feed. Despite the availability of the true history it is a traumatic process for most people to go through as they rid themselves of the lies that they have been brainwashed with all their lives. Alfred talks about how he overcame his fears to eventually come to conclude that Adolf Hitler was one of the greatest leaders that we have ever produced.

Henrik talks about how he has become “skeptical” about the so-called “Holocaust“, because of the many things that simply don’t add up, and as such is very interested to hear about what “Holocaust deniers” have to say. He goes on to say how the “Holocaust” is always talked about in an emotional way by the main stream media, leading him to conclude there is something “fishy” with the story.

Alfred goes on to explain how the people of the West have been, through psychological manipulation, reduced to the level of spiritual, emotional cripples, that have prevented them from resisting, so far, from being flooded with millions of the Third Word.

Henrik tells how that Red Ice has put everything on the line in talking about migration, the JQ, White genocide, etc., wherever the truth leads them. How jews like Barbara Spectre, Noel Ignatiev, Gregor Gysi, talk about the desirability of White population replacement.

Alfred describes how technological development has been used by jews to further their plans, for example with their control of Hollywood, the media, etc. The World Wars and what is happening now is the final phase of the “War of the jew” to dominate the world. And how our empathy, our jew induced feelings of guilt, pathological altruism, and so forth, is being used against us.

Much more is discussed, with Alfred and Henrik ending by urging listeners to write letters of support to Monika.

I would add that Monika’s imprisonment is a real expression of the war being waged against us and our freedom to exist. Her situation is symbolic of the repression that will only get far worst unless we stand up and fight back in any way we can, however small or large. So start sending cards and letters to Monika, and anything else towards helping her and our cause.

Write to Monika now, at:

Monika Schaefer
Stadelheim Prison
Schwarzenbergstr. 14
81549 München,
GERMANY

— KATANA.]

Red Ice TV

Alfred Schaefer

Thought Criminal

Monika Schaefer

Arrested and Imprisoned

in Germany

PART 2

[Henrik of Red Ice Radio interviews Canadian-German activist Alfred Schaefer on the situation surrounding his sister’s arrest on Jan 3 this year, in Germany, for making a video called “Sorry Mom, I Was Wrong About the Holocaust“. In Part 1 here, Alfred explains the intellectual journey that both of them took to arrive at the position that Western Civilization is being destroyed by organized jewry through a long term strategy of psychological and physical subversion, with them, for example, being the power behind the invasion of Western countries by non-Whites.

Part of the subversion of Whites has been achieved through the diabolical lie known as the “Holocaust” that is used by organized jewry as a “shield and sword” to draw attention away from its massive crimes against humanity, such as the instigation of the World Wars, 9/11, etc., while also instilling guilt and shame in Whites for their very existence.

Alfred is a tireless and impassioned “man on a mission” to alert all to the reality of our dire situation and the forces behind our looming racial and cultural destruction, if we fail to act! I would urge all readers to support Alfred in his work and to help him in exposing the Orwellian situation that his sister, Monika, finds herself in as a “thought criminal“, now locked up in a maximum security prison in Germany — KATANA.]

Write to Monika now, at:

Monika Schaefer.
Stadelheim Prison.
Schwarzenbergstr. 14
81549 München,
GERMANY.

Red Ice TV

Alfred Schaefer

Thought Criminal

Monika Schaefer

Arrested and Imprisoned

in Germany

PART 1

[In this interview Andrew Hitchcock talks with Canadian-German Alfred Schaefer again, this time about the sudden arrest of his sister, Monika, in Germany, for the “crime” of making a 5 minute YouTube video entitled, “Sorry Mom, I was Wrong About the Holocaust“. Alfred makes an impassioned plea for people to support Monika and to spread the word about this ongoing  tyranny being brought about by organized jewry and their shabbos goy minions — KATANA.]

Andrew Hitchcock

with

Alfred Schaefer

How YOU Can Help

Monika Schaefer!

Video:  AZK – Sylvia Stolz

Lawyer Who Was Jailed for Presenting

Evidence in the Zundel Trial (full)

Video published on Jan 18, 2013

CLICK TO VIEW >>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoJY5cBxmdw

(English Subs) Sylvia Stolz, a German lawyer who was jailed for presenting evidence in the defence of her client in the criminal court trial in Germany of so-called holocaust denier Ernst Zundel, tells her story at the AZK (Anti-Zensor-Koalition) Conference in Switzerland, in November 2012. In 2008, she was banned from speaking during the trial, barred from presenting evidence, and criminally charged with contempt of court, and with inciting contempt, and charged under the same section of the German Criminal Code as her client, and subsequently imprisoned for 3 years. She is also barred from practising law. After giving this presentation in Switzerland, she is now again facing criminal charges, as is the host and organizer of the AZK, Mr. Ivo Sasek.

NOTE: For a translation of the short interview at the very end, please go here (contains C.C.Engl. Subs) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gJvE_…

Source of the following transcript: http://www.toben.biz/2013/05/sylvia-lionheart-stolz-2/

Transcript of Speech

Sylvia “LionHeart” Stolz

Holocaust®, Issue Banned Speech, banned evidence and banned legal defence. The reality of “Free Speech”.

Ivo Sasek (AZK)

[Image] Ivo Sasek at the AZK Conference, Nov, 2012

Our last speaker of the day will be lecturing on banned speech, banned evidence and even a ban on legal defence in court. On top of everything else, being banned from defending yourself in court constitutes a particularly disturbing problem. This speaker is a fully qualified lawyer and throughout her lecture I find it of particular importance, that we don’t let our judgement be influenced by what our eyes and ears have already been shown or told.

She really made the headlines a few years ago, as a defense attorney. So let me briefly explain with whom we are dealing with. This defense attorney has the courage of the lion. She is stronger than a man, and I have never met a woman with such a profile. She bravely stood up and took it upon herself to defend Ernst Zündel in the famous case against him, for so-called “holocaust denial” She was the trial lawyer of Ernst Zündel.

[Image] Ernst Zundel sits in a court in Germany in 2005 at the beginning of a trial where he was accused of incitement.

During the legal proceedings she provided evidence to the court, which could raise doubts regarding the official account of history. This caused furor in the courtroom. And she was prohibited from speaking any further. This speech-ban was ordered as she was presenting the arguments of the defendant. She was not allowed to argue the case, and barred from listing more evidence.

She ignored the speech-ban and continued to submit evidence. And was then threatened on pain of penalties if she persisted. As it became too much for the authorities, she was arrested right there in the courtroom during her defence of the so-called “holocaust denier” Ernst Zündel. But not even this could silence her, as she continued to speak the case of her defendant while being forcefully removed from the courtroom. For this she was imprisoned for almost three and a half years, in spite of her having no previous convictions.

Arrested in the courtroom and directly into prison. On top of this, she had to face 5 years of “berufsverbot” through cancellation of her license to work as an attorney, and was removed from the Association for German Lawyers. They threw her out, but we would like to carry her into our midst. I urge you to help her along. We are talking about a legend here. Making headlines across Europe.

Welcome Sylvia Stolz. If they won’t let you speak there, we will let you speak here. We trust you to know the limitations. I am sure you do.

Sylvia Stolz’s Speech

Thank you for the warm welcome. Ladies and Gentlemen, dear friends. I’ll say it again, thank you for the warm welcome.

I would like to begin my presentation with one sentence, with which I also intend to end it. I believe that in this sentence, the very essence of being human is unfolded.

 

“To think what is true, to sense what is beautiful and to want what is good, hereby the spirit finds the purpose of a life in reason.”

This is a quote from Johann Gottfried von Herder, “To think what is true, to sense what is beautiful and to want what is good”. Regardless of your religion, your world-view or philosophical orientation this sentence encapsulates the essence of human life, in my opinion. The alpha and omega.

One of the important topics we will be discussing, is “Freedom of Speech”. One hears from many places, that people who have certain opinions get into trouble. And this is not confined to political discourse. I am sure you know of quite a few areas, without me listing them. But to give an example, say, the issue of vaccines. There are doctors out there, who have been banned from practicing, because they warned against vaccination. This is just one example out of many within medicine. Or journalists who are ostracized because they have a differing view of the events of 9/11, 2001 and report on this. Such journalists are also bound to get in trouble. However, these people are not punished by criminal law, but find themselves punished in their respective occupations.

These examples should suffice to show, that the highly praised “Freedom of Speech” in reality isn’t all, that it is made out to be. And now to the issue of banned evidence, banned legal defence within the area of “holocaust denial”. Much could be said about this, one hour is far from sufficient. My job here is to omit that, for which there is no time. But there are certain points, which I think are essential to emphasize.

First of all, it must be said, that the principle of the “defined penal code” has not been fulfilled. It has been downright violated. This principle dictates, that the accused, must be allowed to know, what he did wrong. And what he should have done otherwise If someone takes a bicycle, that does not belong to him, then this of course constitutes “theft”, as we all know. In cases of libel, where a person says something negative, causing reputational damage, then the question of the court is, whether or not, what was said is true or false. And if true, it does not constitute “libel”, because in theory one is allowed to speak the truth. In the case of “holocaust denial” the first problem we are faced with is that the holocaust isn’t defined anywhere. That is the problem of a “defined penal code” An authoritative definition cannot be found anywhere. I’ll get back to this later.

Let’s turn to to the legal passages. First of all the ones within German Law. In paragraph 130 section 3 according to which so-called “holocaust deniers” are fined or imprisoned up to 5 years for each singular offence. In this paragraph there is no mention of the holocaust itself. It is not defined in the law as such. Instead it refers to paragraph 6 section 1 of international law. And here we find a definition of “genocide”. And whoever denies that such a “genocide” has occurred, commits an offence, provided that additional criteria are met, such as “disturbance of the public order”. But what I would like to emphasize is the definition of “genocide” in paragraph 6. It is very brief. I’ll give an excerpt. It is defined as “genocide” when “ONE member” of an ethnic, religious or other group is “killed with the intention of causing the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group”. This means that if just one member of say, a religious group is killed, and the perpetrator intended to kill a part of or the whole group. Then it constitutes “genocide”, according to this definition.

Let us now turn to the question of how it should be defined in order to clear. Normally in cases of murder, a verdict contains the established facts of the police investigation, such as where and when , which weapon was involved, the name of the perpetrators and so on. All this is included in the judgment, after being demonstrated by the prosecution that, say “this was the murder weapon” because it carries the fingerprints of the perpetrator and so on. These things must be stated in the judgment. In cases of “holocaust denial”, we are dealing with a criminal denial of murder, and then of course we would expect to find the details of that murder spelled out too. Otherwise we have no idea, what the accused actually denied. This is the problem, there is no clarity when it comes to what was denied specifically. There should be at least one case against a holocaust denier in which the specifics of the related crime have been demonstrated and specified. I know of no such verdict.

There are no details concerning the crime-scenes, the method of killing, the number of victims, the time-frame of the killings, the perpetrators, the corpses. We have no physical trace of a killing. The testimonies are not specified, neither are the documents or similar kinds of evidence. The intention to destroy all or part of jewry under national-socialist rule has not been demonstrated anywhere. There are no documents showing any prior decisions, plans or orders. When it comes to the trial of holocaust deniers, we do not find these things specified. Neither do we find any references to other verdicts, in which all these things could have been stated. This is the problem. As long as the court will not commit to certain specified crime-scenes on which these mass-killings are supposed to have happened As long as the court will not commit to at least one specified piece of evidence As long as this remains the case, these mass-killings simply cannot be demonstrated. And even less so the “denial” of said mass-killings.

Now some people might say, “What about the Nuremberg-trial? It’s probably in there somewhere, the details?” This is not the case. Let me read you the relevant passage of the Nuremberg verdict, where gas-chambers are mentioned. Here it says and I quote:

“A certain number of the concentration camps were equipped with gas chambers for the wholesale destruction of the inmates, and with furnaces for the burning of the bodies. Some of them were in fact used for the extermination of Jews as part of the ‘final solution’ of the Jewish problem. Most of the non-Jewish inmates were used for labor, although the conditions under which they worked made labor and death almost synonymous terms. Those inmates who became ill and were unable to work were either destroyed in the gas chambers or sent to special infirmaries, where they were given entirely inadequate medical treatment, worse food if possible than the working inmates, and left to die.”

That is all it says about gas-chambers in the Nuremberg verdicts.

[Image] The International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg 1945/6

It is all stated in general terms such as “a certain number of concentration camps”. It is not mentioned where the gas-chambers were. This means that a defense attorney is left with no place to begin. It is also important to emphasize that the rules of evidence where nullified in the Nuremberg trials. Very important parts of them at least. It says here, in the London statutes which were written specifically for this military tribunal. Here in Article 19 it says:

“The Tribunal shall not be bound by rules of evidence”.

That is a sentence which is worth pondering. That a military tribunal, from its inception is given a free hand when it comes to rules of evidence. And furthermore in article 21:

 

“The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge, but shall take judicial notice thereof.”

Interesting, right? It shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge, but what are “facts of common knowledge”. It is usually the job of the courts to establish the facts, not presume the facts.

[Image] Robert H. Jackson, chief US prosecutor at Nuremberg, during his closing address to the Tribunal at Nuremberg 1946

It all becomes somewhat clearer in the words of the American chief prosecutor Robert H. Jackson. He stated in the Nuremberg protocols vol. 19 p. 440:

“As a military tribunal, this Tribunal is a continuation of the war effort of the Allied nations.”

I’ll repeat, the Nuremberg tribunal is “a continuation of the war-effort of the Allied nations” Does a nation engaged in a war-effort need rules of evidence, as it seeks to burden its opponent with guilt?

I would now like to read you a passage from another verdict, in which one might assume to find the details of the holocaust specified. This is from the so-called “Frankfurt Auschwitz Trials”. Here it says in the final verdict, and I quote:

“The court lacked almost all the means of evidence of a normal murder trial and necessary for gaining a truthful image of the events at the time of the murder. There were no bodies of the victims, no autopsy reports, no expert reports on the cause and time of death, there was no evidence as to the criminals, the murder weapons, etc. Verification of the witness testimonies was only possible in rare cases”

And further below:

“The court was therefore in the clarification of the crimes of the accused almost solely dependent upon witness testimonies. Additionally, there were barely any of the witnesses, who could be described as neutral observers of the occurrences of the Auschwitz concentration camp”.

From this verdict we are forced to conclude … or simply take in what is written to see that:

 

“the court was in the clarification of the crimes of the accused almost solely dependent upon witness testimonies”.

 

[Image] The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trials (1963 – 1967) was a series of trials charging 22 defendants under German law for their roles as low-level officials at the Auschwitz camp complex.

This is the starting point of a trial for holocaust denial, and it is also the end-point of a trial for holocaust denial, because nothing ever changes. One never gets to know, neither as defence attorney nor as prosecutor what actually has been established as fact. One cannot know from the prior verdicts, old of new. Surely there is a lot in the media and much can be read in books about it, but obviously, we need to hear what has been determined by the courts. We want to know.

At this point I would like to add a very telling statement by 34 French historians. In 1979 these 34 historians issued a statement in response to the technical evidence presented by revisionist historian Robert Faurisson who sought to disprove the existence of gas-chambers. These 34 historians all hold to the official account of the holocaust and put forward the following as a counter-argument to Robert Faurissons line of reasoning. I quote:

“It must not be asked how, technically, such a mass murder was possible. It was technically possible because it happened. That is the required point of departure of any historical inquiry on this subject. It is incumbent upon us to simply state this truth: there is not, there cannot be, any debate about the existence of the gas chambers.”, end quote.

This also belongs to the point of departure of a trial for holocaust denial, because this is how the judges, the prosecutors etc. are behaving. Through their actions they are clearly letting you know, that you are not allowed to ask. This has had immense consequences.

I am in no way the first lawyer to be punished for “holocaust denial”. Not by a long shot. I might be the first lawyer to be imprisoned for it though. But for years lawyers have been accused of holocaust denial, because they submitted evidence regarding details of the holocaust. When submitting evidence, one necessarily have to phrase it as statements of facts. Otherwise it will not constitute evidence, and will be dismissed. That means you have to claim as fact, that which you want to demonstrate to the court. Otherwise it is not valid, and can be dismissed on formal grounds.

But when submitting evidence on behalf of a holocaust denier, asking the court to establish that “so-and-so is the case, by expert testimony or in accordance with earlier reports”, etc. Then the evidence is not admitted by the court, and the lawyer is then accused and sentenced for holocaust denial. The general public know very little of this, because the lawyer in question seldom wishes to attract any attention. They simply pay the fine, and tell themselves that they will stay out of trouble in the future. There are a great many cases like this.

But I thought to myself, why should this remain unknown to the public. The way the accused are being treated, the way justice is miscarried. To punish lawyers simply for doing their job. I felt it was important to me, that the public get to feel this too I will now turn to the Bavarian court for prosecution of attorneys, who was to decide whether or not I should lose my license. Here again i submitted evidence regarding the presupposed “obviousness” of the holocaust.

The evidence again was not admitted, and the reason given was, that the court in light of the available books and pictures hold no doubt as to the “obviousness” of the holocaust. I as well as my lawyer then requested that the court point out, which books and which pictures gave them certainty with regard to the “obviousness” of the holocaust. These requests were dismissed because: “the holocaust and the national-socialist violent crimes against the jews were ‘obvious’”. So, we did not receive an answer as to which material, formed the basis for the certainty of the court. All we got was a very general reference to “newspapers, radio and television, lexicons and history books”. End quote.

In other words, if you want to know why you are being punished, then you should go and look it up in the newspapers. It will not appear in the judgment. Go look it up in the “Bild-zeitung” (german tabloid). This is of course an important point they have, about “the newspapers”. What does the newspapers say?

A French historian Jacques Beynac ,was quoted in Le Nouveau Quotidien de Lausanne, a Swiss newspaper in September 1996. He said:

 

“When it comes to the existence of nazi gas-chambers, all one can do is, to point out the absence of documents, of physical traces and similar types of material evidence”. According to him, “all one can do is, to point out the absence of documents, physical traces and similar types of material evidence”

 

This is the opinion of a French historian, who by the way supports the official account of the holocaust. Does this not show that the “obviousness” could and should be questioned in court?

Another historian, Ernst Nolte wrote in his book “The Causal Nexus”:

“The witness testimonies are for the most part based on hear-say and assumptions. The few eye-witness testimonies we have, are in partial contradiction with one another, and raises questions regarding overall credibility”

The historian Hans Mommsen was quoted in the “Süddeutsche Zeitung”, saying “The holocaust was not ordered by Hitler”. Again statements showing that questions regarding the “obviousness” of the holocaust are valid.

The last statement I would like to read to you is from Fritjof Meyer. In the journal “Osteuropa” he had an article entitled “ The number of Auschwitz Victims. New insights from newfound archival documents” He wrote the the following with regard to the crime-scene. He is editor at “Der Spiegel” by the way… In may of 2002 this journal came out in which he states that the genocide did not happen within in the concentration camp Auschwitz. Instead the genocide happened: “In the two farmhouses outside of the camp, probably”… so the genocide did not happen inside the camp, but “probably” in two farmhouses outside of the camp?

Again this shows, that evidence concerning the “obviousness” of the holocaust should be allowed in court Now, let us see where the supreme court stand with regard to the criminalisation of holocaust denial. Because the law here prohibits a specific kind of speech it is regarded as a “special statute” within the law. This special statute is acknowledged as “unconstitutional”, by the supreme court, because it goes against the constitutionally guaranteed “freedom of speech”. This was determined by the supreme court in a rather recent decision from 2009. The official acknowledgment of paragraph 130 as a “special statute” is a small step forward. If they would just take the consequence and repeal the law criminalising holocaust denial due to its unconstitutionality… However, I will not spare you their reasons for not doing so. The justifications given by the supreme court for upholding the special statute.

In the so-called Wunsiedel-decision of the supreme court of 2009, the court declared that Germany is by way of exception allowed to keep special statutes such as paragraph 130. That is the statute criminalising one particular kind of speech, with the inherent criminalisation of evidence and legal defense… Germany is by exception allowed to keep this special statute because of “the unique historical identity of the Federal Republic of Germany shaped through contrast to national-socialism” In other words, they are allowed to keep the exceptions to free speech, because it is the “Federal Republic of Germany”?

This is very well put. It brings out the arbitrariness rather well. The second justification is not stated as clearly and is found elsewhere in this supreme court decision. Here they speak of “unique” crimes and seem to suggest that, because we are dealing with this “unique” crime, then by way of exception demonstration of evidence is both superfluous and criminal. Giving evidence is both superfluous and criminal, when dealing with a “unique” crime. Does this seem logical to you?

At the end of the day, these are the two pillars upon which the criminalisation of holocaust denial rests. It is the justification within legal-theory, so to speak.

“The unique historical identity of the Federal Republic of Germany” and the “unique crime” itself, are the reasons given for not allowing the demonstration of evidence.

Revisions and constitutional complaints are regularly dismissed as “obviously unjustified” Which again entails, that their decisions need no justification. When something is “obviously unjustified” it of course needs no justification… How neat, that is.

Again the answer is not given with regard to questions such as, “What are we allowed to say, then?” There is no answer. I heard the following statement by judge Meinerzhagen myself in court, during the trial of Ernst Zündel. But if I had simply told you, you would probably not believe me. And it is of course not stated in the transcripts. However the “Berliner Tageszeitung” (Berlin Daily) the socalled “TAZ” had the honor of reporting this statement by Judge Meinerzhagen. I now quote the Berlin daily newspaper “TAZ” from 9th of February 2007 reporting on the trial against Ernst Zündel:

“Towards the end, and much to the surprise of the anti-fascist groupings present, the court dismissed all the submitted evidence. For the short and simple reason, that it is ‘completely irrelevant whether the holocaust really did happen or did not happen. It is illegal to deny it in Germany , and that is all that counts in court.’”. Close quote from TAZ.

I will now return to the sentence with which I began this lecture, “To think what is true, to sense what is beautiful and to want what is good”. This implies the ability to identify and label lies the ability to identify and label the inhumane the the ability to identity and label injustice It also implies character traits, which is of particular importance in our age. The knowledge of our immortality, of steadfastness and incorruptibility. With such character we might be able to shape a world for the many children who were up here earlier today. A world in which we are allowed to speak the truth without punishment.

Thank you.

Ivo Sasek:  Thank you. Sylvia Stolz

——————————-

Transcript of short interview given after the AZK speech

BREAKING ∞ NEW CHARGES AGAINST Sylvia Stolz

 CLICK TO VIEW >>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gJvE_1HQPg

I would like to add something to my presentation, one thing which I could not mention for time reasons. I mentioned that everybody who does something reasonable, beneficial, something healing, … runs the risk of being called a “Nazi”. And if you want to avoid being called a “Nazis”, you MUST ignore the crucial topics and thus you become ineffectual.

However this is not the only reason why I don’t mind being called a “Nazis”. If you know what is behind it, if you dealt with the subject, it’s not an insult. If someone calls me a “Nazis” I don’t consider it as an affront.

There is the story of a late, senior lawyer, he was in a bakery and while he was queuing he overheard talks of “Nazis”, in the usual way, ill of course, and finally he said: “Did you ever actually encounter a ‘Nazi’? Look at me!”

I think this is the right attitude to deal with this matter.

——————————-

Sylvia Stolz’s

Last Words in Court

http://iamthewitness.com/doc/Sylvia.Stolzs.Last.Words.in.Court.htm

[Image] Heroic German lawyer Sylvia Stolz (with heroic German lawyer Jürgen Rieger), who was disbarred and served three years in prison for debunking the Holocaust and vigorously defending Ernst Zundel.

German Patriot Defence Lawyer Sylvia Stolz was sentenced to 3 and-a-half years in prison and disbarred for 5 years.

Below Sylvia’s comments to the court.

She says the Court is perverting and repressing the truth with the cudgel of “Holocaust,” making a mockery of justice. Her trial has made clear the criminal absurdity of prosecuting “Holocaust Denial.” How can one deny something that never existed? She says these entire proceedings began as a show trial in a kangaroo court and never progressed beyond that point. The main proceedings were projected with smoke and mirrors and the official fairy tale of “Holocaust” was enforced by undisguised force. She observes that the political intent of the Court is the ultimate eradication of the German Nation and its replacement by a mongrelized and deculturated population of mindless consumers.

Sylvia says she is confident that she has succeeded in exposing this Court to the whole world as an agent that is hostile to the German Nation. By openly and flagrantly violating the law, this Court flees before the truth. Incessantly, like turning a prayer wheel, it has rejected her every evidentiary motion with the cynical pretext of “abuse of court procedure.” ….. She has hope and faith that the German Nation will someday bring this treacherous Court to justice.

Sylvia describes how the Defense was forced to accept the contents of the indictment, and this caused the Court’s desired verdict to be the inevitable consequence. In the absence of material evidence, the Court relied on its infantile rulings that “Abuse of Procedure = Criminal Act.” Thanks to this judicial sleight of hand, there was no assumption of innocence and the Court did not have to prove guilt.

Sylvia asks: to what is Grossmann referring when he mentions “domestic and foreign” court verdicts? Could he be referring to the Nuremberg show trials? The Allied Military Tribunal was nothing but a postwar Talmudic Inquisition conducted by Germany’s enemies. It featured witnesses with “built-in credibility” and Jewish testimony that could never be questioned or authenticated.

She asks: what would people like Grossmann do without the official obligatory fairy tale of “Holocaust?” Her trial has again demonstrated that world political powers are players in the “Holocaust” game (or “Holocaust Industry” as Prof. Norman Finkelstein calls it, he should know, since both of his parents were interned at Auschwitz during the War.) This explains why objective historical research is still suppressed, sixty-three years after the end of the War. As an example of ongoing intellectual repression in Germany Sylvia refers to the “Hermann Case” in which a popular commentator was fired for referring to such positive aspects of National Socialism as its family policy and the construction of Autobahns.

Sylvia demonstrates that the Court’s procedural system is very, very simple. It consists of disallowing all evidentiary motions as “abuse of Court procedure,” which is a criminal act. She says that the District Attorney’s closing tirade was beneath all legal criticism, nothing but purest slander and abuse…..Then Sylvia shows how powerful interests profit greatly by inculcating a negative self-image into German society, with their incessant propaganda and brainwashing. If Germans were as evil as Grossmann depicts them, they would long ago have skinned him alive.

She points out that under the present Talmudic Inquisition, anyone who calls attention to the destructive nature of Judaism can be punished. Glenz tells the Court Reporter to write that remark down as well. Sylvia observes that today, no one is allowed to say anything the least bit derogatory about Jews, and yet the necessary first step toward changing and improving conditions in Germany is recognizing the cause of our malaise. She says that Horst Mahler’s writings provide the proof for this, and she will stand by this assertion. Glenz orders the Reporter: “Put that in too!”

Sylvia continues and remarks that Germany now stands under the yoke of world Judaism. Glenz threatens: “We are going to cut off your final address if…” But Sylvia ignores him and says that following World War II, the real criminals took over the world. Glenz growls “I’m warning you!” but Sylvia again urges the public to consider the causes of Germany’s plight and continue gathering and considering the material evidence. She tells the Court that National Socialism is not dead, regardless of how much Grossmann and his ilk wish it were dead. She says that National Socialism represents what is good and enduring in the German spirit. Idealism and patriotism are rigidly suppressed at this time but they cannot be suppressed forever.

Turning toward Grossmann and the Court, she asks:

 

“Is he German? Or is he perhaps related to that Moshe Grossmann who for four years following the end of World War II continued torturing and murdering German slaves in the East, as the Jewish author John Sack reports in his book An Eye for an Eye?”

Then she turns to the Bench and asks:

“What about you — are you Germans? ‘German’ stands for honor and steadfastness! Think of Deutsche Treue! Nobody can call what is going on in this court as ‘honorable.’ In this court, the only ‘justice’ is inspired by the Talmud!”

Sylvia expresses her faith that history will take its inevitable course and “the truth will win out.” She says that since the trial began she has been prepared for her preordained conviction — she told them at the beginning that she knew her verdict was handed down, even before her indictment. To the Bench she says:

“And you, my high-and-mighty judges, will never again experience inner peace… Your depiction of National Socialism as a criminal system will see to that. You are willing accomplices to the brainwashing and degradation of the German people…. Adolf Hitler accurately recognized the Jewish problem, the malevolent power of the Jews in certain respects… Yes, I share the values of National Socialism!”

Sylvia replies,

“If my actions bring a little more light into this dark hour for Germany, then I will gladly go to prison! It does not bother me that I am officially ridiculed and insulted by this despicable court and atrocious government … My high and mighty judges, you are convicting yourselves, not me.”

======================================

PDF of this post. Click to view or download (2.4 MB). >>Sylvia “LionHeart” Stolz

Version History

Version 3: Feb 28, 2020 — Re-uploaded images and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version.

Version 2: Dec 2, 2018 — Improved formatting.

Version 1: Published Aug 10, 2014