Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and welcome to Patriotic Weekly Review, episode number 267. And I’m here tonight with lots of people. This isn’t a regular episode, it is our election special, so we’ve got an entire panel who I’ll be introducing shortly. I’m going to try and keep my intro to an absolute minimum. We’re obviously live on Odysee, we’re live on Rumble, we’re live on DLive, and we’re live on Entropy.

 

I will be back on Friday. I’ve got a pre-recorded video about how it’s actually us, the people who are genuine ethno-nationalists, that have influenced the election in more ways than one and forced Farage into adopting our talking points. Look out for that Friday. I’ll also be back for a special stream with my brother from another mother, aka Natty, on Sunday, but we’ll discuss that later at the end. Please do consider making a small donation towards this show if you enjoy the work I do, if you value the fact we’re putting forward general election candidates, if you like all of the other bits and pieces that I do on a regular basis, please consider donating via Odysee or Entropy.

 

Remember, none of my work goes behind a paywall. Everything is free. All of the streams you can watch anytime, anywhere. You can even download my book for free. You can also donate by crypto-currency. All the crypto links are in the description below. That’s on Odysee, that’s on Rumble, and that’s on replay over on BitChute.

 

If you’re watching there, please consider donating via crypto if you want to be more anonymous.

 

And finally, you can download my book for free, which is at www.thefallofwesternman.com and you can write to me at Mark I think that’s the quickest intro I ever did. Less than two minutes. Let’s get into it. We’ve got three people here.

 

I’m just going to describe them all to the best of my ability. We have Natty, who is a very good friend of mine. Myself and Natty, we like gaming together. He has great political takes. He was obviously somebody who was a leading groyper back in the day. I’ve met this guy on numerous occasions. He is a wonderful man. He is a father, he is a nationalist, he’s a role model. He’s also a great speaker. We’ve got Tollah is another very good friend of mine. He’s been here from the start. Former host of TASOB [The Absolute State Of Britain] of he now has a couple of awesome shows of his own. He is a comedian. He’s a man who gives absolutely wonderful advice on how to deal with belligerent women. A hero to us all, I would say.

 

And finally, we’ve got David Clews, the media mogul of the group. David is another man I’m proud to call a friend. He is the host and owner of Unity News Network. He shows an absolute fire. I enjoy watching them. And if the family are out on a Saturday or Sunday, and David’s doing one of those all afternoon streams, there’s nothing better to dip into. He’s a scholar, a gentleman, and I get on really well with him, too.

 

And of course, he’s also a family man.

 

So let’s get into it, guys. I’ve done the intros, everything’s out the way in three minutes. That’s never been done before.

 

So let’s get into this, because it’s about the general election.

 

I was going to do it maybe next week. I didn’t want to do it on the eve of the election, but I think so much stuff has happened that it was worthy doing it tonight. And we’ll go around the group, always starting with Natty. We’ll try and keep our answers short.

 

And let’s start with the big question very briefly, what are your predictions for the outcome of this election? And obviously, we’re going to talk about the big parties, talk about Reform. Also mention our friend George Galloway, who we’ll speak about later because he’s in the middle of suing Hope Not Hate, apparently, which is very interesting. But what are your predictions, Natty?

 

Natty: Labour win. Farage takes a few seats, Tories hopefully lose a lot and end up with very, very few seats, but get humiliated by Reform. Labour government may be the biggest, biggest number of seats in a very long time, so that very, very, basically, that’s my prediction for it. I’m pretty sure that’s pretty standard. I don’t know if anyone’s got any in from the left field ideas, but I’m pretty sure that’s what’s going to happen.

 

Mark Collett: Well, not to butt in, mate, but very quickly, if you were to predict, I’m not saying down to the last seat, but predict roughly how many seats Labour will get. What’s your prediction?

 

Natty: 570. Is it something like that? I think that’s probably about right. 570.

 

Mark Collett: Wow!

 

Natty: I don’t know if there’s going to be some Green seats. I know people always talk about alliances. The thing is, when you’re this close to it, the noise is almost unbearable and you can’t make out much. And every morning there’s another story, political gaffe or blunder or whatever, but it’s going to be a big Labour win, I think.

 

Mark Collett: Good, good.

 

Well, thank you for that. Tollah, my friend. Good to have you here on the all star panel. What are your overall predictions, my friend? When you’ve given them in, if you say Labour, if you say Tory, what do you think the winning party is going to have in terms of seats?

 

The Ayatollah: Well, thanks for having me, first of all. Yeah. You can’t predict anything other than the Labour win, despite the fact that there isn’t an enormous amount of grassroots enthusiasm for Starmer or for Labour. And that’s not helped by the fact that they’re seen as being complicit in the Gaza genocide, you know, by their sort of, broadly speaking, their kind of zionism and so on.

 

Obviously, it always bears repeating that Keir Starmer. Keir Six Pointed Starmer, as I called him on TASOB four and a half years ago when he replaced Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader, when the jews had Corbyn ousted. He’s married to a jewish woman and they’re raising their daughters in the jewish faith. My main prediction is that the Tories won’t do as badly as people predict, sadly. I think they may well still get over 100 seats.

 

As to how many Labour we get, I don’t know. Reform might take one or two, but they won’t take more, despite the fact that they may actually get a really good number of votes, because I think we’ve got an unprecedented level of disillusionment with the two major parties. I mean, on the lack of popularity of Labour, the one point I would make is, even though it was all predicated on, like, a type of deception, of a sophistication we haven’t seen before in British politics.

 

And it was all predicated on kind of lies and spin, say what you will, about new Labourites, demonic as they were, and their kind of successes remain. People were deceived into genuine enthusiasm for them before the 1997 election, before the kind of Blair and brown era. I don’t think that’s the case that time. But people hate the Tories so much, and with good reason, you know, that they’ll. Yeah, they will get hit hard, but I think they may still get over 100 seats.

 

The Tories. The latest prediction today from Telegraph was that they’d get 53 in a survey, the Telegraph commission, the Tories. But I don’t know how many that would leave Labour with? It’ll be a lot. I think they’ll have a decent majority because I can’t imagine the vote’s going to be split too much other ways because of First Past the Post, basically.

 

Mark Collett: So if you were to give a number of Labour seats, what would you go for? Natty’s gone for 570, so you’ve got to pick a whole new, …

 

The Ayatollah: What’s the total in Parliament? Is it about 630 or something? Right.

 

Mark Collett: Remember, 2 seconds. Remember, only 632 of those seats are on the mainland, so 18 and Northern Ireland seats, which basically you never get Labour.

 

So, you know, even if Tories totally whitewashed it, they’d still probably only get 632. Do, you know what I mean?

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, I mean, a bit would depend on how the and [word unclear] do, but I would think Labour would be on course to get well over 450, I would think.

 

Mark Collett: Give me an exact number.

 

The Ayatollah: 463.

 

Mark Collett: Okay.

 

And finally, on to the big man himself. Big daddy David, we are blessed to have you here tonight, mate. And I am really looking forward to your take. Specifically, the next question is a question for you. But what are your predictions, my friend?

 

David Clews: I’m predicting victory for the Likud party, the Trilateral Commission, the Fabian Society. It is quite, quite funny. I just took Tallis to the next level. Yeah. I’ve had the opinion from the very start that Sunak is actually deliberately throwing this election.

 

Now, you know what? I quite like my rabbit holes. I like to be, perhaps one might say, slightly more conspiratorial. I think that Sunak is throwing this election on purpose, and the reasons I think he’s doing that is he had no excuses or reason to call it when he did in July. He could have waited till October, November. His behaviour on the campaign trail has been so horrific, it was the same as during Covid. Remember, they always used to say:

 

“Well, it’s just incompetent. There are degrees of incompetence.”

 

So I think he’s deliberately throwing it, and I think they’re doing it because they want to install Starmer, because Starmer’s their golden boy, and Sunak is a puppet. He’s typical of all these sort of basically Indian CEO’s that run companies now. They’re all very, very Zionist. They’re all very pliable. And he’ll go to San Diego. Job done.

 

I mean, yes, it’s an uncomfortable couple of months. Yeah. I mean, seats wise, really, it could be anything. I think the one thing I would say is, I think the SNP might do better than people think. That’s the only one up in Scotland. Like, everyone’s written off the SNP. I am not so sure that Labour will do as well as people think up here, but in terms of seat predictions.

 

So you’ve got 630 at play. I would say that that Tories will get less than 100. I think the Lib Dems will do pretty well. Probably about five. I would say about 540 would be my number.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, well, I’ll give my brief predictions. I’ve already predicted a Labour landslide and I’ve said Labour will get between 500 and 550.

 

So I’m going to go square in the middle there at 525. I think the Tories will get less than 100 seats. I think, like David said, the SNP will do slightly better than expected. And I’ve already said, actually, that the Tories could be pushed into third or fourth place actually behind the Lib Dems and the SNP, if things go particularly badly, because you’ve got to remember, not every marginal seat is a marginal seat. That is Tory, Labour. There are many marginal seats which are Tory Lib Dem. Lib Dem seem to be a vote that people would rather jump to rather than Labour in certain sort of leafy Tory areas.

 

For some reason, I think that Farage may well get elected in Clacton. Now. I said he wouldn’t earlier, but he’s become such a legitimate celebrity candidate after being on the:

 

“I’m a celebrity, get me out of here!”

 

He’s just got this power. You rarely get this.

 

I think there’s only two candidates in the whole country you would call celebrity politicians, and that’s Galloway and Farage.

 

But I don’t think Farage will get enough of a block in Parliament to be significant. I’d like to be proven wrong there, but because although I don’t like Reform and what Farage really stands for, the fact they’re talking our talking points, it’d be nice to see them going over the line on an ethno-nationalist ticket, which is what they’re fighting on. Deport all migrants. Which is basically his new campaign slogan. Deport all illegal migrants. Stop the boat is the exact same wording, minus two letters. What is on the election leaflet that we’ve put out for the ethno-nationalist candidates as they deport all illegal immigrants rather than migrants? Stop the boats. He’s basically lifted that off us.

 

So in a way, it’s an endorsement of our points, which is good. So my prediction is 525 for Labour fewer than 100 for the Tories. Lib Dems doing okay, SNP doing better than expected, but Reform really unfortunately slightly underperforming. And I do think Galloway will be unseated in Rochdale as well due to the amount of establishment pressure being put on him. And I hope, I’d like to be proved wrong there, but I think that’ll be the case.

 

Anyway, let’s go on next because this is a real David Clews question. We’ll go around the group. I didn’t have to stop David earlier because he was going into the territory of the next question, which is, what do you think this is all going to lead to? Because we’re going into a time which may make the majorities of Blair and Thatcher look piffling. It’ll certainly likely to make the Johnson majority look small. This is going to be for one party to end up with over 500 seats and the rest to be very fragmented, is new territory, post Second World War in the UK. What do you think that will lead to, Natty? A massive Labour majority. What will that lead to?

 

Natty: Well, it’s hard to predict because I know David said that it’s the Likud party winning.

 

However, a significant proportion of Labour’s base and their core voters are really not on board with Israel. And a lot of, like Corbynite voters who will hold their noses and vote for Labour Party aren’t happy with Starmer’s stance on Israel. So it’s easy to think, well, big majority, pro-zionism and just unwavering support for Israel.

 

Now, you may get that in the backrooms, but it’s not going to be on the surface. And they can’t go shouting about that if they do. I just want to say, I mean, I have given the biggest prediction for the Labour seats here. I haven’t just pulled that number from my backside. I know that there are going to be conservative holdout seats, but you’ve got to remember that there is still a racial component to this and a lot of the kind of pension age people who died in the war, Conservatives are going to find it very, very hard to vote for Rishi Sunak, if nothing else, purely on racial grounds, because it’s like a national shame, national embarrassment, that we have an Indian man at the head of the country, ostensibly the head of a country. I mean, we all know that he’s beholden to other powers.

 

However, don’t underestimate the fact that, as the Twitter and the pundit class would say, these people are racist in the best way possible and will not vote for Rishi Sunak.

 

Mark Collett: That’s a good take. Tollah, what do you think? Where’s this leading? And what will happen with such a sizable Labour majority?

 

The Ayatollah: I think it would be terrible. I think the overwhelming majority of what we hate will rapidly accelerate. There wouldn’t have, you know, had the Tories carried on it like people somehow kind of been kind of psyopped by some, but even by kind of this occupation standards, incredible conditioning and manipulation into just voting the Tories in again, which isn’t going to happen. It would have continued to accelerate because that just seems to be what they’re doing.

 

But there’s going to be even less kind of token resistance to that with Labour. What you’ve got to remember with the Labour Party is they are staffed not entirely, but almost entirely by true believers, like actual cultists. These are cultists of the Zionist occupation regime, make no mistake about it, and a lot of vengeful non-Whites.

 

Now, don’t get me wrong. Obviously it’s comics, as Natty was just talking about. It’s comically true of the Tories of recent years with Sunak, with Braviman, with Patel, with Javid, with Kwarteng. You know, that the name goes on. The list goes on. Sorry, the names go on, whichever you prefer. Yeah, they’re obviously racial foreigners as well.

 

But I think some of them probably are somewhat milquetoast Conservatives rather than absolute grievance mongers like your Diane Abbotts and everything else.

 

Now, as despicable as the Tories are, and we can’t say that enough, I think there are some people within the party, albeit they don’t have much influence at all! They’re somewhat normal. Still, in their sensibilities. They are not total ZOG cultists. I think that’s much less true with Labour. They will feel they’ve got a mandate to do all of this stuff. Yes, it’s antithetical to what, you know, people in the old Red Wall, which is presumably going to be at least partially restored in, like the north of England want. But who gives a damn about what they want? Who’s give damn about what, you know, who’s giving damn about what they want and what people like us want for generations? Nobody.

 

So they’ll feel they’ve got a mandate to just go full throttle with immigration, with anti-White legislation, with just creating an atmosphere of anti-Whiteness. They’re obviously going to be controlled enough by the usual Zionist interest that, yeah, they’ll have to ride out the tension of being hated by part of their Muslim base and whatever else for continuing to support Israel and jewish interests.

 

Now, the other thing with that is that what that may lead to, and this is an obvious prediction to make, is a fracturing in which they lose a lot of their Muslim support and Muslims look to form their own party. That’s probably been sort of down the road for a while and we’re getting closer to it, but I think things will get worse.

 

But, yeah, that may, as awful as that sounds, that may not be a bad thing because the riots been on the war for a while, that things will have to get worse before they get better. But whether they will or not, that’s another matter. Whether they will get better, that is. They’ll definitely get worse.

 

Mark Collett: Thank you, mate. This is one for you, David. It’s almost the question written for you, but what’s going to happen with this Labour majority and how bad could it be?

 

David Clews: Yeah, these are all fantastic takes and everyone really gets it. I’ve been listening to a lot of the Academic Agent, he started the zero seats campaign and he’s obviously a very, very sharp guy.

 

I mean, yeah, I’m quite black pilled when it comes to politics in general, but I understand what he’s trying to do and his point is you destroy the Tory Party, which is one part of the university-party, at least one standing, Labour have nowhere to hide. If I was Keir Starmer or if I was in the Labour front bench, I would probably be excuse, shitting myself right now because you’re going to get in, you’re going to have this huge majority. This isn’t 1997, you’ve not got a balanced budget, you’ve not got an economic surplus, you’ve got huge financial problems like nothing compared to what Blair inherited, and you’re going to be the only ones left. Like, there’ll be nowhere to hide and what he is saying will happen.

 

And I think this is very believable and even, dare I say, as much as I hate him, Andrew Neil pointed this out as well. Within six months, like, support for the Labour Party will collapse because you’ve got all those internal conflicts. People will see what’s going on.

 

And that’s where, though I, again, I am slightly more conspiratorial about it all. I think there is a plan for some form of conflict and war and I think that’s what all this is leading towards, whether it’s NATO troops on the ground in Ukraine or. I also think Trump will get in a war with Iran on behalf of Israel. So I think. And that’s where you’re going to talk about Farage. That’s where I think Farage also has a role to play in. We could maybe expand on that.

 

So initially, I think you’ll have Labour will come in, there’ll be this groundswell of support. But this is not 1997. This is not like I remember when Blair won in 97. People loved Tony Blair. Like, there was I hated him, I hated the guy, but you could see it and, like, things can only get better. What basically this election is, we fucking hate Britannia, mate.

 

Mark Collett: Is what?

 

David Clews: Britannia.

 

Mark Collett: Britannia.

 

David Clews: We hate the Tories. Let’s give them a do. And everyone’s right as well about the racial aspect of it. Starmer, even Labour have been playing the dog whistle. Starmer was. Well, that’s the problem with Rishi Sunak. He just doesn’t get Britain. Now we know fine well what that means. He’s saying:

 

“Well, he’s not one of you.”

 

And the public get that as well, and that will be the nail in the coffin for the Tories.

 

And at the end of the day, whether people like Starmer or not, he is an English man. He was born in, I mean, he’s a Cockney. I mean, well, he’s not really a full Cockney, but it’s in the southeast of England. He’s genuinely one of the people. And people don’t view things the way we do. So for your average normie, they’ll look at it, they’ll say:

 

“Well, yeah, he served the government, he’s a Sir, we’ll vote for him.”

 

The Ayatollah: His father was a tool maker, apparently. Yeah, he definitely did. Yeah. Funny, funny, funny.

 

Natty: As to cycling back to the question, it’s very easy to say things are going to get worse before they’re going to get better.

 

But when it actually comes down to the wire and you’re staring down that choice of a huge Labour majority, it is intimidating, because you’re right, it is going to get worse. You think it’s draconian now, things are going to be bad, and we’re looking at different aspects and different things going on and saying, it’s bad now, it’s bad now, it has to get worse before it can get better.

 

But for things to actually get worse and to actually make that choice and put a Mark on a piece of paper, that’s a difficult thing for nationalists to do because it’s so much easier just to cling on to hope and say our Reform, they could change it around, this is good times and maybe the right people in a Conservative Party could change things around.

 

But it’s a tough choice. Every man in his own head is probably thinking, you know, Labour are gonna really really hurt us as the native population and there’s no question about it.

 

Mark Collett: Well I’m gonna have a couple of predictions that you can all comment on.

 

Firstly, I think there is a meaning to all this. I’ve noticed that Labour are campaigning with the Union Jack a lot.

 

There’s been prevalent discussion of conscription, return to national service, the importance of the military being a strong nation. Sunak said he doesn’t want to be a wartime leader. Andrew Bridgen said the country’s already at war. I believe Suella Barverman said that we are effectively at war as well. I think they’re cleaning out a tattered worthless government that wouldn’t have the moral backing to take us into an actual hot war, to bring in a party that would have such a backing on paper that it would look like they had the legitimacy to take us into a war and a clean record because all those old Labour MP’s that were part of the Blair Brown times, most of them have gone now.

 

This is a fresh start. I think they’re looking to take us into something very very dangerous and I think part of that will be bundled with if we’re going down this route, if we’re going to war, if we’re going to be fighting, we need a massive clamp down on any form of dissident discussion and that will be dissidents on both the Right, mainly the Right, but also on the left as well because they will want to say:

 

“Look, we need a unified nation because now.”

 

And look this is shades of World War Two because World War Two was:

 

“But we’re fighting for democracy, we’re fighting for freedom, we’re fighting for British values.”

 

All this crap. When really they were fighting to keep a certain group of bankers in control of the Western world, that’s what it was for, and to prop up communism. And the communists were the brothers of the bankers who were controlling the Western world. That’s what happened. It’s just a fact.

 

And I find that a lot of the same rhetoric used then is being used now:

 

“We’re fighting for democracy. There’s a shadow over the world, an Axis of evil!”

 

What were the, what was the German and Italian forces called? The Axis forces. It’s almost like when you’re reading a poem and everything rhymes you can see the lines that match up with the ones that have been previously spoken. And this is all happening.

 

And just as they did with Mosley, just as they did with other dissident groups in the UK, I can see them really clamping down on indigenous groups specifically because they’re going to need White men. A war in this country, or a war involving Britain does not get fought without White men marching off happily to die. And they don’t want White men listening to this panel of people tonight or listening to UNN or tuning into one of Tollah’s shows. They don’t want that! They want White men thinking Labour is the party of the Union Jack, the party of patriotism, so they’ll fight.

 

Natty, I don’t know if you want to comment on that. And we’ll go around the group before we move on to Farage.

 

Natty: Let someone else go first, I think, on this one.

 

Mark Collett: Go on, David. You go first, mate.

 

The Ayatollah: This is your one.

 

Mark Collett: We’ll do it in reverse this time. We’ll go David Tollah, Natty this time.

 

David Clews: Yeah, I mean, he’s exactly correct. The language being utilised. Grant Sharp’s an Axis of Tyranny. Except I struggle to comprehend, though, how the ruling elites are the powers that think people are going to fight these wars for them. Because where is that support going to come from? And who is going to go to the recruitment offices? Because we have this aged population. Young guys have never been in the cadets, the scouts, they don’t know how to fire or strip a gun. I mean, you watch the footage of cadets marching. They can barely march, certainly not in step.

 

So it is a weirdness about it, which, again, makes you feel you’re at this kind of end of Empire stage.

 

But yeah, that’s where, and I know we’re going to talk about Farage. That’s where I think the likes of Farage comes in, Tommy Robinson comes in, Geert Wilders, there’s Marine Le Pen. And that is why you see the Zionist power structure, you know, pivoting away now towards what you would call Right-wing politics. And there is this clear alliance that now exists.

 

And a lot of people are mistakenly thinking, well, we work with these people and we get to deport people. We get to do all that.

 

Actually, no, you’re still on the strings. You’re not going to achieve anything.

 

And I think that’s probably one of the more interesting dynamics that’s coming out of this, because you look at some of the Reform stuff, you look at what, and all that seems okay, but then you just realise, well, it’s not being done for our interests. It’s being done for that group’s interest. And I was putting this up today. You’ve got Blackrock supports Starmer coming in. You’ve got Blackstone now buying up rental properties.

 

So the international banking cartel is still, business is still booming in the UK for them.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, I mean, just follow up on that. I mean, well, particularly on what you were saying, Mark.

 

I mean, that’s interesting because if they’re going to do what you described, then it has to be, it needs to be, as you’ve said, they need White men if they’re going to actually participate in like a kind of a NATO versus Russia and its allies war or Iran or whatever. They need a lot more White men than they’re getting. And we’re talking kind of long time scales because you’ve got to recruit them, get them in and all of that kind of thing.

 

And it would necessitate, if they’re going to do that and then kind of basically clamp down harder on non-compliant Whites. They need to draw a sharp distinction between the two. And it needs to be a lot of carrot and a much more conciliatory tone. Contrary to what I was saying, I would expect the Labour government to be like before. They will need to box a bit more clever with that and just throw the White working class a bit of toffee and just soften their rhetoric a bit and make it, you know, sort of butter them up. You know, make it, make a few token concessions.

 

And then, yeah, people like us, they will kind of quarantine as much as they can and really clamp down and it will be a kind of a, well, which way do you want to go? Do you want to be patriotic or do you want to be one of those people in jail? And it’s quite possible they’ll go that way with it, I suppose. Yeah. Because as you say, when you look at it in its geopolitical contexts, the sort of the drums of war seem to have been being struck for a good while now.

 

But I mean, just picking up on what David said, I think it was you, David and other people shared it around. I think it was you that shared the video of the, like, it was kind of combined services marching. And I used the word loosely through London a couple of, like a month or two back and they’re all just like fat, uncoordinated idiots. Like, with the greatest respect, I’d be more scared of sees.

 

Mark Collett: It was like the old police.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, no, I’d be more. I’d be more scared of the Bass street kids teaming up with Harvey Price, you know, so, I mean crikey. Yeah, it’s extraordinary! I mean the slight black pill on that is they’ll get enough, like high IQ, autistic people to kind of do the high tech stuff, which is a big part of our war is fought now with your drones and your unmanned vehicles and all sorts of other things and cyber warfare and all the rest of it. And you ain’t going to be mega-bright to go and be cannon fodder, but you’ve got to be at least competent and have a bit of bottle. Are they going to get people that are like that? Well, if they do, yeah, they want to get more working class White people.

 

So, yeah, they might have to sort of be a bit of current. Stick with the White population. And that’s always our lament.

 

I mean, I said this after Chris Kearney, better known as Charlie Big Potatoes, got his sentence this time last year. The great frustration under this regime is, and it’s like the old point that I heard Warren Balogh make this point once about communist Hungary after 1955, I think it was. They kind of realised you can’t, it doesn’t really pay in the long run to be absolutely brutal with everyone because you make an enemy of everyone together and everybody knows what’s going on. The more people, you limit that to the real harsh treatment.

 

On the one hand, it’s not that it’s more effective, but you aren’t creating so much ill will among the other people that are allowed to just sort of stay fat and comfortable. Not that too many people were kind of fat under communism, although apparently they were in Russia. The Russians were fatter in the seventies than in the eighties. Sorry, than Americans in the seventies, apparently. That’s courtesy of Eric Striker. I’ve been forever checked that off your bingo card.

 

But, yeah, that’s me done for the moment.

 

Natty: Yeah, that’s right. At the moment, the client groups of the British government and European ZOG, whatever you want to call it, are immigrants, third world immigrants, Africans, Middle Easterners, whatever. But a war, all out war with NATO’s enemies, it’s entirely possible and reasonable to predict.

 

But actually the White young men of this country are treated as a client group and are riled up in the way we see Tommy Robinson riling up against Muslims. And he obviously gets paid for that, paid handsomely, to ignore people pointing out the obvious truth to him, that it’s actually people not exactly like us, but our peers, young guys, young White guys, native people of this country, who are treated as the client groups of the British state in order to get them back in tanks, to get them back in trenches, to teach them how to fight and to try and instil some sort of patriotic values in them.

 

Whether that’s possible, I don’t know. Have they done enough damage? It’s hard to see from where we are, because all of us here, I hate our government because they’re absolute scum and they’re absolute traitors! But for a bricklayer, or a tradie, or a guy who’s not that plugged in, it’s hard to say.

 

I mean, this may become illegal at some point, but I wouldn’t fight for this government. I think you’d have to put me in jail first. And maybe that’s a choice all of us are going to have to make down the line at some point. Hopefully not.

 

But it’s entirely possible that they can actually achieve that with the right people. And we’re skirting around for arch.

 

But I think that’s where the conversation is going to go.

 

David Clews: Again, just to come in quickly on that from a more chess perspective, what they would require to do that is some form of, I would call, serious false flag provocation. You would need 9/11 style events because you look at America after 9/11, George Bush’s approval rating went up to like, what, 94, 95% or something like that.

 

Now, if you’re to witness, I know, dare I say, someone running around a shopping centre shooting people and their Hezbollah ID card drops out like they did with Mohammed Atta’s passport falling out of the sky. Don’t underestimate the power a serious false flag attack or some form of real visual thing would have on the general population. When I come across people in the counter jihad movement the hatred that is there for Muslims, for Islam, for the Islamification which is real, you know, that many places have been changed. If you were to see Lee Rigby style situations, Manchester bombing situations, I think people would mobilise.

 

You saw the football lads alliance, the amount of people that got out for that. So I certainly wouldn’t put it past the government that there would be these huge false flag attempt things, there would be Muslims that do it linked to Iran, you know, that funded this was funded by Tehran, this, the mullah. Even though Shia Muslims have never engaged in international terrorism or done all that, it’s always been sponsored by Mossad, the CIA. I think you would find that would really, and as you say, they know people are race based and they want to plug into that.

 

So that’s what I think is how they would really mobilise public support.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I want to pivot away from that slightly before we go on to Farage, just for a quick point, because there’s been a lot of this in the press over the last couple of days.

 

Now, one of the things that Labour is intent on doing as well seems to be attacking middle England. And I was prompted to mention this because David said something very interesting about Blackrock, Blackstone. These are the huge investor groups, but they really do seem to be intent on already preparing a charter that will primarily hit your sort of just above average tax paying people who’ve got a little bit of something for themselves.

 

So one of their insane schemes is to put VAT on private school fees or why would you do that? If somebody’s paying to send their own child to school, they’re doing the nation a service.

 

Number one, they’re easing the burden on state schools, which are already too full.

 

Number two, they are paying for a better standard of education for their child.

 

And the more educated people you have in your nation, that’s a good thing. Why would you then increase that family’s burden by 20%, potentially forcing their children out of a better schooling, dumping them into an already over stretched, oversaturated state school system, unless you just hated people having anything nice. And it’s the same with inheritance tax. They’re already talking about increasing inheritance tax, they’re talking about swooping on family savings accounts.

 

This, to me looks like a blatant attempt by what can only be described as people who have serious aspirations to produce some kind of communist terror, redistribution of wealth, etcetera, to actually take what little there is left from people who have lived a frugal life and got a bit of a nest egg.

 

I mean, that to me is in many ways as terrifying in terms of its intent as taking us to war. Because really what you’re saying, and if you put those things in the same basket, let’s not totally separate them, let’s put them in the same basket. Now you’re reducing everyone to the level of being an utter peasant under these political rulers, these financiers etcetera. And then you’re saying to the peasantry:

 

“Now you’ve got nothing. We’re marching you off to war to die.”

 

What’s your thoughts on that, guys? Who wants to go first on that one?

 

Natty: Yeah, there’s a level of discomfort that states who oppress and are, in our case, in the process of slowly ethnically cleansing. There’s a level of discomfort where people don’t rebel. And it’s typically in revolutions, it’s been the middle class who have been activated against the elites. This is true in Russia. And they’ve always had elite support, normally from the elites who aren’t in power, who support a middle class uprising.

 

Now, again, I mean, maybe I’m in the Right company here for conspiratorial talk, but reducing the middle class and taking enough away from them so that they become dispossessed and hard up and struggling to make ends meet, but not to the point where they’re ready to grab a pitchfork and a Molotov cocktail is exactly the kind of evil shenanigans that a government like ours would pull.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, I think a lot of people heading towards that point because of cost of living increases as well. I would just say quickly, and because of the lack of viability for a lot of people, of even renting sometimes, let alone owning a home, forming a family and all the rest of it.

 

But, I mean, if they’re orchestrating that to the degree we think they might be, it’s whether they end up striking the right balance, because, as you kind of allude to, Natty, it’s a delicate balance.

 

But anyway, I digress.

 

David Clews: Look at what they did to try and curb inflation. They stuck interest rates up to, what, five and a half percent?

 

Now, all they’ve actually done is created a boom for the boomer generation. I actually go quite hard on boomers, no offence to based boomers watching, but what they did by doing that was people under the age of 60 who had mortgages, you’re shafted. You’re an extra 5% a year interest, you know, 5% on 100 grand, five grand, 200 grand, that’s ten grand.

 

Whereas if you’re sitting there with a decent enough nest egg.

 

So what they’ve done is they’ve done that and they’ve screwed this generation.

 

And as you say, Mark, about the private schooling as well, is for a lot of people, the choice is a local comprehensive school in a diverse area, or you pay a bit extra.

 

And the thing is, that’s actually a very regressive policy on private schools, because when you do that, it subsidizes a place for someone else, actually benefits the state system.

 

And again, it is what you find with the people like Starmer and the people behind him is it really is race to the bottom stuff. It will be about equality and diversity.

 

Whereas at least, dare I say, Blairism. Blairism at least got the more aspirational aspect of this country that he got Thatcherism, whereas with Starmer, his career, he’s been director of public prosecutions. Very banal. And they don’t want anybody to be in. Like they probably another thing they’ll do, and I know a lot of people watching this will do, is they’ll probably ban home-schooling, because if they hate you sending your kids to a private school, though, they would hate you even more that you’re educating your own kids.

 

I mean, that, I think should be another cause for concern. They would say:

 

“These kids might be getting taught far-Right propaganda at home, and they’re not getting the same.”

 

So they’ll start with private schools, then it’ll be home-schooling, and then it’ll be faith schools as well, until it’s just bog standard comprehensives preaching the gospel according to Starmer.

 

Mark Collett: So does anyone else want to comment on any of that before we move on to the man, the myth, the legend, Nigel Farage? Because that’s where this is going.

 

Now, Farage has come out of nowhere, and from a guy who at the beginning of this election, wrote an open letter to the public saying he wouldn’t be standing, he now seems to have been reactivated to the point where either he was playing an amazing game or the state needed him to do this. It’s one or the other.

 

Now, on one hand, you could say the state needed him because they want to smash the Tories and grant Labour this year, huge majority, to take us to war.

 

But on the other hand, he has played a very good game. And look, I’m not his biggest fan, but you’ve got to grant credit to a Smooth Operator when it’s due. And apparently, allegedly. Supposedly, when he left the Brexit Party, it has been said to me by several people that he took in the region of 18 and a half million pounds because it was his company, he took it with him. He said that was his money, it was his severance, etcetera. No one stopped him doing this. And I don’t believe there’s any litigation against him. I don’t believe he’s technically done anything illegal.

 

If it is true that he did this, and then he used that money, apparently, allegedly, supposedly, to buy his way into things like GB News. He’s effectively now, whilst retaining full control over the Brexit Party because he is the sole director of it and it is a company.

 

And then he uses GB News to pump out, 24 hours a day, Nigel Farage, publicity broadcasts and boom! What have you got? It’s almost like I’ve got the name of the damn film now.

 

David Clews: Orson Welles in Citizen Kane.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, almost like Citizen Game, where he buys up the media to get himself elected. This guy has used his money, he’s used his power, he’s got the Daily Express on his side, he’s got GB News running constant reels. The BBC and other groups are having to wheel him out, because if they don’t, no one’s going to watch the debates. I mean, no one cares about Angela Reyna, some low IQ chav debating with Penny Mordant to some relatively yummy mummy, middle class housewife.

 

I mean, that’s just mild titillation as best. They want Farage on there, ripping them a new one so they can’t ignore him.

 

And what’s more, they’ve made him what he is, a little bit like they made Trump by putting him on. I’m a celebrity by building him up when he wasn’t doing the politics. It let him come back even bigger, tougher, more relatable, more lovable than he was before. I believe the milkshake thing was a setup to get him sympathy and get him talked about. There’s pictures of him and that girl hugging each other when she’s., … You know, on that day, she looked like a scruffy little chap that no one would have got on with. The night when she’s hugging him. The night when she’s hugging him. And she met him before in a beautiful dress, hair done, nice, makeup all done properly. She looks like the kind of girl he might have on his arm the casino or something.

 

And to me, it looks like a mixture of him playing his cards very well, a little bit of maybe contrivance and the system having to build somebody up to make the election interesting.

 

But I think Farage is pulling it out the bag.

 

But I’m not sure whether he will get the electoral gains that you would think he would deserve for the amount of publicity he’s getting.

 

What are your thoughts on Farage and on his prospects? Natty?

 

Natty: Well, I think this is a lesson and unfortunately, the Americans have not learnt this, and you’ve put a lot of detail in there, and it’s very well done, and you’re absolutely correct on all of it. But you take a slightly more bird’s eye view on this is a lesson, unfortunately, the Americans haven’t learnt yet, despite Trump betraying them. I think we in Europe are still going to have to learn this, which is why our fortunes are not going to change in the next 5, 10, 15 years, possibly that far out. But he goes to America, meets up with Trump, comes back, and all of a sudden, the playbook is almost exactly the same as Trump in 2016. He’s probably got the same type of money behind him, and we would be looking at the same sort of betrayal if Farage did get in.

 

Now, he’s obviously not going to become the prime minister, not in this election cycle, in the next election cycle, if Labour are really going to be as unpopular as we think they are. Possibly. But at that point, we have to then learn exactly what the Americans failed to learn with Trump and what the French are going to have to learn with Marine Le Pen and the Germans, possibly with AfD, and that Reform isn’t good enough and Reform isn’t going to save us. I don’t know what is yet.

 

But it’s trying to keep a decrepit and rusty train on the tracks using dog whistles and red meat, tastier red meat, than you’re going to get with the Tories, for sure. But unfortunately, for all the excitement and to read Nigel Farage’s manifesto, I know it’s not called that, it’s called a “Contract”. And it’s very easy to write something like that when you’re not staring down in the face of power. But to read that even someone like me, who can’t stand Farage, and I know the history of Farage, even me reading that is like, this is amazing!

 

But like I said, it would have to be a lesson that we would have to learn, and it’s going to be a hard lesson.

 

Mark Collett: Tollah, your thoughts?

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, well, I mean, you mentioned there about Farage probably playing a smart game and being controlled intelligently as well, and some combination of, too. But he’s probably not. There’s still not a great likelihood that Reform are going to get enough seats in Parliament to exert much influence. And I mean, look, even if they did, again, they would be controlled to a greater degree than they are now and to as great a degree as the powers that be need, really, and First Past the Post is the perennial obstacle to that, to any insurgent candidate or party really exerting much influence over even the discourse in this country, because discourse and kind of the Overton Window is the only thing that ever really seems to get influenced, influenced.

 

But then again, and acknowledging that even with that, Farage is possibly somewhat controlled. I mean, to the degree that you can probably have some idiot true believer who’s the head of whatever. I mean, he was banking with Coots, wasn’t he, when he got debunked? But coots are owned by one of the big sort of they were owned by Nat west or something, and it was some senior executive there. He’s probably some idiot true believer who’s not in on the whole thing, has signed off on him, having his bank account taken off him, and then it’s come back to like, well, no, no, no, you don’t do that to him. You do that to these far-Right people, you do that to White nationalists, you do that to people from Patriotic Alternative and so on and so forth.

 

But, yeah, I mean, Farage somewhat controlled and somewhat of an asset that we would appear to be. I mean, bearing in mind, whether consciously or not, because, I mean, he’s obviously sort of proud to proclaim how UK sort of were a massive spoke in the wheels of the British National Party 15 to 20 years ago.

 

However, what people miss is the fact that they were then promoted for that purpose. They were promoted by the establishment. That’s why the idiots, the mushrooms, or the vegetables, as I like to call them, the rank and file regime loyalist liberals would be in paroxysms of rage about Farage. Why is Farage on Question Time again? Farage is on there so that they can boast for more support for UKIP, so that that gets in the way of the British National Party, gets in the way of the thing that you’ve really being conditioned to be afraid of the genuine article. Farage is a bit of a scarecrow.

 

But, I mean, even then, unless you believe that the powers that be wanted Brexit, and in the end, even if they didn’t think it eight, nine years ago, they’ve probably been given this and we’ve seen enough evidence to show that they could have been more or less indifferent about it, because it’s got us none of what we would have wanted. UKIP under Farage, despite only winning one seat in the First Past the Post system did a lot to force the referendum which led to Brexit.

 

But again, when that kind of thing happens, like you know, if, say, Le Pen gets elected in France, they can control them enough that nothing ever really happens. Same with Trump in America. Nothing, you know, nothing that the native White population ever really want that really matters is ever allowed to happen. And barring any kind of political rupture, I think we are stuck with that.

 

David Clews: Yeah.

 

I mean, the way I kind of describe it is what we’re really viewing is a pantomime or some theatre, and it tends to be the people that direct the films in Hollywood direct this pantomime as well.

 

So when you’re, if you look at it that way, there will be some characters that you really identify with. There will be characters that get really angry and walk off stage every so often, but they’re still part of the same play, they’re still part of the same nexus and power structure. So it’s always important to recognise that.

 

And I think there is a level of pragmatism you do need to have and say:

 

“Well, look, this is the system that we’re in. You have to work within the confines of it.”

 

But I am much more negative about Farage because I think he is there for a very specific reason.

 

And I think that October 7 was such a pivotal moment in history. And Farage has been brought in to co-opt the genuine anger, the Right-wing support for potentially upcoming conflicts with Iran or whoever. And Farage, if you look at old Farage, Farage knows the score. He knows who pulls the strings. He talked regularly about Soros. He would talk about, he was much more sympathetic to Putin, doesn’t do any of that now. You know, he is very focused.

 

And I had our guest on Kathryn Blakelock the other night, who’s certainly taken an interesting turn recently. And she was like:

 

“Well I’m not really into geopolitics. I’m more worried about the potholes and Greater Yarmouth.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Well like, geopolitics is really everything here and the power structure and so many people are still stuck five years ago. They’ve not moved on.”

 

And it’s the same with Trump. Like, the big thing for me about Trump was this hundred million donation that Trump’s got from (((Miriam Adelson))). You don’t get given 100 million by Miriam Adelson, who is the richest woman in Israel, owns the casinos, if you’re just going to be a nice guy and put the interests of White Americans first, that’s the money.

 

And then all of Wall Street is now behind Donald Trump as well, Bill Ackman, Steven Schwartzman at Blackstone, even Larry Fink, even the ADL have given the nod. So I see this as all the pieces being put into place.

 

And I think Farage is a key part of that because he will represent the sort of contain the Right-wing anger that there may be. He will be a Churchill figure, if you’re using the analogy. Again, he will act as that “I’m patriotic, I love this country”, etcetera. He’ll play that role, and he’ll play it very well, and people will subscribe to it. Again, we can look at it on a short term vote Reform to give the Tories a kick. Fine.

 

But I think with Farage in Parliament, I think he’ll have a very, very specific role to play. He is, again, he wants to be part of the establishment. Like, I watched all the royal coverage. Farage was there at the Coronation, all the wonderful patriotism. King Charles, like, he is only gonna take things so far. He will do what needs to be done, whether it’s because he’s blackmailed, compromised financial, or maybe he just, he just wants the title.

 

And again, the other thing that I think we sometimes forget is a lot of these people have blackmail on them. Like, you know, we don’t work or live in these circles. You know, a lot of these people have done a lot of things in the past. They’ve been a lot of places. It’s such a murky, murky, murky world, and we only see a very, very shallow part of it.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I’ll say one thing, and this is partially about what my video’s about on Friday, so I don’t want to go into it. I’m going to lay out in my video all the reasons, all the sort of evidence I’ve got, Farage not being us, but he is talking our talking points. You know, when we put together these campaigns about stop the boats, deport all illegal immigrants, I didn’t think Farage would take that point on verbatim.

 

Yet he has.

 

And I’ve got to say this for me personally, I believe the more radical Right has had a profound effect on this election, because our constant badgering of people, our constant banner drops, leafleting, pressure that we’ve put on, seems to have driven people like Farage into new territory. We’ve pulled the Overton Window in our direction, and I’ll actually present evidence of this in my video on Friday.

 

But if you look at what Farage is standing on, it’s actually a more radical platform than what the BNP stood on in 2009 at the European election. I did the videos. I did the leaflets back then and the leaflets back then were not heavy on the anti-immigration. They were putting British people first, British jobs for British workers. They did say “no to immigration” boldly on there, but they didn’t say anything about deporting illegals or rounding anyone up. Farage is unironically being forced to fight this election on a more ethno-nationalist re-migration platform than we ever did.

 

David Clews: But again, they can do that.

 

The Ayatollah: No. And they’re never going to get voted in.

 

David Clews: Sorry, but do you not think that they’re doing that on purpose to try and, like, destroy, like someone like yourself? The people here, our viewers, who are genuine nationalists, of course they’re doing it because of that.

 

Mark Collett: But the fact they’ve been forced to do that.

 

David Clews: Yeah, it’s true. It’s a black pill and a white pill at the same time. You know, I’m not saying.

 

Mark Collett: I’m not saying it’s going to get us to power, but for them to start using nakedly ethno-national, like, deportations, remigration, all of that, once you start talking about net numbers, Net Zero-500,000 these are the discussions taking place. But these aren’t the discussions of civn ats in 2016. They’re the discussions of ethno-nationalists that we have been absolutely staunch on.

 

And I just wanted to ask you all whether. Is that a little bit of a silver lining to the cloud of what is clearly, you know, controlled opposition?

 

Natty: Absolutely!

 

But with the caveat that you just do not rest on your laurels. You just have to be uncompromising on this idea that we are being ethnically cleansed.

 

However, whatever definition you want to use, it is happening. It’s happened to the Cockneys, it’s happened to the Brummies, it’s happened to the people of Leeds and Leicester. That is happening! Be uncompromising on that and be uncompromising on calling out jewish supremacy. And the power of the tiny ethnic group seems to hold just all of our governments under total power, basically.

 

So just don’t bend on these and look what happens. You do force, you do change opinions, you do force people to come around. You’re right. 2016 was a different time. It was meme worthy and Brexit and all the rest of it. But there have been certain people who have just held the line on these ideas.

 

And in a way you’re right, it has worked and it is depressing to see like David said, it’s a double edged sword. You see these talking points taken up by people who were just doing it for the grift and are just doing it to contain, but nevertheless, they had to pick them up anyway and had to pick them up and use them to gain popular support.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah. I mean, while sort of politically aware White nationalists, and I say politically aware White nationalists, I’m talking about us because we’re aware of the fact that on certain things, large swathes of the population agree with us, but they’re kind of still what we would call “normies”.

 

And I’ve always been fond of the line that a normie is someone who can say have some sound instincts, but say:

 

“Well, we’re all one race, the human race. But Enoch Powell was right!”

 

In the same sentence because that’s what sort of normal people are like. They’re kind of suggestible to the last compelling, the last thing they heard that sounded compelling and authoritative. But while we’re sort of smaller in number than we would like to be the case, small groups of people who kind of understand what’s going on and make a lot of noise have an outsized impact.

 

And I think you can see the legacy of things they obviously didn’t want to happen and didn’t want to have to contain in ways they did more in terms of rhetoric than anything, rather than anything that happened electorally. But you have got stuff like Brexit and that adjacent to it in sort of the middle of the last decade, we’re going back nearly ten years now. It’s 2015, 2016. And you could actually see this. It probably illustrated all the better not by all of the reaction, but by part of the reaction. Certainly the reaction on the American sort of kosher right to October 7. The Left is another matter that’s basically entirely of the jews own creation through the anti-White agenda and the kind of the victim of hierarchy and all the rest of it.

 

The way the Left reacted is entirely, you know, something they created blown up in their face, which is something to sort of villainise and demonise and attack White people, however, in the way that they just can’t contain the Right, in the way they used to. In the kind of reactions you see to particularly US military recruitment videos. Yeah, I don’t want to die for Israel. You know, they put a load of White men and adverts for the army and the Rangers and whatever else, the Marines. And the comments are just all basically people like us, people probably not as radical as us, but people that are aware of the idea that, yeah, you know, sold that for a game of soldiers, if you give the expression, I’m not dying for Israel. Yeah, it’s had an impact. It’s definitely had an impact that they wouldn’t want to have to contain.

 

I mean, I always say this like, the thing is, the problem is with each round of gatekeeping, they have to kind of hold the gate slightly more ajar. And you’re always going to get the large majority of the people the wrong side of the gate are not going to get through. But the people with the most initiative, some of them will make it through because they’ve to have a sort of a perception, like perceived legitimacy. They’ve got to hold the gate ajar a little bit. And that basically, in practical terms, just means, like, rhetorical concessions. And, yeah, to a degree, they do sanitize some of our talking points.

 

But if they wanted to be using them, they’d have been using them all along, and they haven’t been. I mean, Tommy Robinson was on record saying this last week, wasn’t he? No chance! Posted it on Twitter on X. You know, saying, like, Tommy Robinson was basically saying:

 

“The reason I talk about the White replacement agenda is because the only people that do it otherwise are all, they’re anti-semitic!”

 

Yeah. Because, of course, the great priority for any White political activist is to prevent, you know, criticism of and dissatisfaction with a foreign group of people who basically hold a grossly disproportionate amount of power and ultimately have the final say on pretty much everything naturally.

 

Mark Collett: But, yeah, so what Tollah is saying in the politest and kindest way is that’s the, that’s the polite and kind way to kick me in the bollocks and say, Mark, you spent your whole life crusading for something that you were absolutely right about, but these shills are going to Nick it off you at the last minute, run with it and get all the credit. So there you have it.

 

But that’s what happens when you have a system with contingency. That’s a system with contingency. They have a contingency for everything, and their contingencies control opposition.

 

But one last thing I’ll say about fo this is just my personal take. I do love seeing a different candidate coming out in the news every day for saying something nice about Hitler or the Third Reich. It’s like, you know what?

 

David Clews: Is interesting about that because for when Tice was in charge. They were so cucked to everyone, they basically, they buckled.

 

Whereas when Farage came in, they’ve actually been. It was when the guy said that we shouldn’t have got involved in the Second World War. Reform actually initially put out a press release saying:

 

“Well, that was actually a widely held opinion by many people in the 1930s.”

 

And all of this stuff is very helpful in the Overton Window.

 

And again, it’s like Farage was talking with more on Susanna Reed and Ed Balls, and he was talking about. He said:

 

“Look, he disagrees, etcetera, you know, we did the right thing.”

 

But then Farage did actually say at the end, he says:

 

“But I mean, all that guy was doing was expressing an opinion.”

 

And that’s the thing again, about Farage is like, I think deep down, like, Farage wouldn’t put us in jail for talking about the things that we talk about. Nigel Farage wouldn’t jail you for putting up “It’s okay to be White” stickers, right?

 

We will obviously be very critical of Nigel Farage, but he’s not like Keir Starmer, he’s not like Hope Not Hate, he’s not like the psychopaths that will be around the Tory Party or even the Labour Party. So it’s.

 

I think a lot of people will just have that pragmatic approach to. And say:

 

“Well, look, he’s, he is where he is.”

 

And again, you saw the audience the other night, had Clark.

 

I mean, we’re all probably, what, late thirties, early forties is the only people that really vote on mass are the 60 plus generation. That’s who votes. Like, by and large, the people don’t vote as much under the age of 60, so they have to pander to that boomer generation, they have to do everything. And really, Farage, Farage, I mean, he’s so kind, like, he goes to a pub, like, everyone laughs, you know, he’s infectious and you just, you can’t take that away from him. He is clearly the number one political performer as is Donald Trump. As I say, unfortunately, they’re acting and being paid for by the wrong people.

 

Mark Collett: We’ve got two more questions for you, then we’ll do the Superchats. If you haven’t Superchatted yet, or if you like the stream and think we deserve a donation, please consider doing so. but two very quick questions.

 

The first is about George Galloway. David Clews, best mate. I actually like George and I actually think, look, I got a lot of flack a while back. I’m not going to make this into a monologue, but I got a lot of flack a while back for saying it was a good thing that he got elected.

 

A lot of people in my comments calling me a cuck, I said both the Tory Party and the Labour Party need destroying with new alternatives on both the Right and the Left, which were both of which were willing to talk about different issues. I thought Galloway fulfilled that point, but I don’t think he’s going to get re-elected in Rochdale. I think the entire establishment’s coming down on him.

 

If you’ve seen the stuff on my page today, he’s talking about suing Hope Not Hate. He’s saying that they’ve literally pulled everything out of the bag to destroy his party in Rochdale. That the increased turnout and the fact he’d be up against the Labour candidate this time when he wasn’t last time. I think, sadly, he’s going to lose his seat and I think that’s going to be a bad thing because I was disappointed with his party’s performance. Farage came out there stood 609 of the 632 mainland seats, but Galloway only stood 125. That’s still a good look, still a good effort. It’s still a lot more than any ethno-nationalist group did. But he was initially saying he was going to stand over 500. And look, I’m not putting him down because I wanted him to stand more. I was just disappointed. There isn’t that alternative for Labour voters that there is for the Tory voters. I don’t know what your thoughts are on Galloway, but I do wish him all the best. But unfortunately, I don’t think he’s got he hasn’t come out with the numbers.

 

Natty: The Labour alternative seems to be the Green party, which is just dead on arrival.

 

I mean, it’s really sandalwares and juice drinkers voting for the Green party. You know, I can’t vote for Keir Starmer type of people. No, Galloway is good. I mean, you got to look at Galloway as an instrument of destruction as opposed to anything else. And the only, this is a this is a very basic test. But who receiving the hardest when Galloway won? Zionists. And if Zionists deceiving. You know, it can’t always be a bad thing! You know, the enemy of my enemy, and all the rest of it.

 

So, yeah, I’m pro-Galloway. It will be a shame if he loses just having him out in front out in the public view. It is in the same way as Farage dropping ethno-nationalist talking points.

 

And if you remember, Galloway was nodding to racial politics in his election.

 

So that’s a good sign. That’s a good sign. >As far as I’m concerned.

 

David Clews: George Galloway is, as a performer, but I mean, he is a bit older now. I actually think he might be nearly. Let me actually just look up exactly what, what?

 

Mark Collett: He is in his seventies, mate.

 

David Clews: Yeah. You know what, he might even be nearly 80, I think.

 

Let me just actually double check that.

 

The Ayatollah: He’s only 69. You know?

 

David Clews: He’s only 69? I thought he was older.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah.

 

David Clews: Do, you know, why? The reason he wears the hat most of the time. Do the reason behind that? He actually got a really bad kick in from a jewish guy in London. He got beaten up really, really badly and he’s got like a big bruise on his head.

 

So, yeah, he got a real kick in. I think Natty’s point was accurate. Who was seething the most about Galloway? And that’s when member Sunak came out and gave the speech and the former Nick Griffin backed him. And this guy’s so dangerous! I think, on geopolitics, George Galloway has been really correct over the last 30 years on his geopolitics. He was right about the Iraq war, he was right about Afghanistan, he was right about Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria. He has been outstanding on geopolitics. But George Galloway is also a kind of creation of the post 1945 mythos. And he does view the world through a Marxist prism of politics. I’ve interviewed a few of the people from the Workers Party and they’re all really nice people.

 

And again, when it comes to the war issue, I get on really well with them and we’re all anti-war, but they still, like, they have this weird take on why people do things. And obviously, I think it’s wrong, but it will be a shame to see Galloway not doing well. But I think he was caught off guard. And the reality is most sort of Left-wingers out there who are busy enough to get involved will be kind of, hate to say the word, but “woke”, you know, Galloway stuff would cut through to the public.

 

But it’s a tough one. And for him.

 

And at the same time, you know, he does, a lot of people on the Right find it hard to support Galloway because he does play the Muslim vote. You see pictures of him down the mosque and he’s surrounded by hundreds of people from Pakistan. The optic is a tough, it’s a tough one for Galloway to do because a lot of people, the other point.

 

Natty: Is that the old Red Wall, the Corbinistas, you could, you could appeal to them that immigration is bad because they’re basically scab Labour, destroying the hard working gains of the Labour movement of the last 150 years. Unfortunately, George Galloway is not strong on that.

 

So there’s a whole tranche of people out there who could be stolen from Labour in exactly that way.

 

David Clews: I always say that mass migration is a “tool of the cat”, to use Marxist parlance. It is a tool of the capitalist classes. You’re correct. You’re scabbing like Keir Hardy, who founded the Labour Party. He actually led numerous walkouts in the coal mines because they were bringing in Lithuanian coal miners. If you are a Leftist, or a communist, you should be against free movement because it suppresses wages and it overly benefits the capitalist classes. But like, as you say, Galloway, the thing about mass migration is for a lot of reasons, sort of the Left, so to speak, they just, they love it. They think they enrichment, like, they love multiculturalism. So it’s such a hard nut to crack amongst that demographic of the population.

 

The Ayatollah: One of the things I had in my notes for tonight, if it were going to come up and it kind of, it didn’t in the way I might have thought it would. And it’s a point I’ve made before about the trade unions. The same thing applies to the Labour Party because in theory, they were founded to represent the same interest, the interest of working people. And it just relates to the fact that obviously we’re pretty unanimous in wanting to see the absolute destruction of the Tory Party now, just because of pure spite of what they presided over over the last 14 years.

 

I mean, their treachery goes back much further than that, as it does with Labour, when we sort of the terms in which that’s couched, like, well, look at the horrors the Tories have inflicted upon us for this past 14 years, always either explicitly stated with that or taken as read is, well, they’re supposed to be the ones that look after us. We know Labour will betray us and ethically cleanse us. That’s the Labour Party we’re talking about again, established to represent and govern on behalf of working people.

 

Yet we take it as read that they will be more treacherous than the party of the rich, which is basically what the Tories are.

 

I mean, that tells you first, not that any of us need telling, how utterly poisoned all of our institutions are by the occupation under which we live.

 

But, I mean, it’s funny, David, you mentioned the Labour Party, a one time campaign against the import of Lithuanian miners and that kind of thing. I knew somebody who was a Labour councilor on the south coast at one time and he gave it up basically in the midst of the mid 2010s because of how anti-White they were and because he was becoming more of a nationalist. And he referenced that.

 

And then also that actually reminds me of, funny enough, there’s no Reform candidate standing in my constituency because whoever was standing is utterly spineless. He was worried that Labour might actually beat the Tories in this constituency. So he’s not standing. They can’t put anyone else up now because it’s passed the legal sort of time limit.

 

But I’m going to vote for the SDP in my constituency. Very, very small party, but the Social Democrats are basically a little bit like what blue Labour promised.

 

But, I think that was always a controlled opposition thing as well because it’s run by somebody called Maurice Glassman, but they’re kind of like old Left social Conservatives, anti-immigration and so on.

 

But, yeah, no Reform candidate where I am, but there is an SDP candidate.

 

Natty: Just get blue balls and a blue and white flag. Hey, Tollah.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, exactly, mate. Yeah, yeah. Speaking of which, there’s been a score in the football, but anyway, I won’t spoil that for anyone if they’re trying to avoid it.

 

Mark Collett: Right, guys, one last question. And Natty, Tollah’s already ruined it by answering it by mistake. Who are you all going to vote for, if you don’t mind saying? I’ll say, I don’t think I’ve got an English Democrat, or a British Democrat in my constituency. I’ll likely vote Reform just because it’ll be the only thing on the ballot paper that represents anything like my views.

 

And I’ll be voting that as a way to thumb my nose at both Labour and the Tories whilst still going out and voting and not being one of those bums who just sits home and does nothing and allows the rest to say:

 

“Oh, well, you don’t count in the statistics.”

 

What about you, Natty?

 

Natty: Yeah, Reform. There are a couple of independents down here in my constituency who are good as well. But to kick the Tories and kick Labour again, like you said, it’s Reform.

 

Mark Collett: Tollah said SDP. What about you, David?

 

David Clews: Well, I’m going to be. I’m in a purity spiral here.

 

And I’m not voting. I just find the whole thing a farce, to be honest.

 

Mark Collett: Are you going to go and spoil your ballot paper?

 

David Clews: No, I’m not even going to do that. Because that’s in dot. That’s all right. If I was running the show, I would say the best thing to have is nobody voting. Because then the regime has no legitimacy.

 

But obviously people aren’t going to do that.

 

But it’s so stupid. Like, you go in, you tick a wee box. I think they want that because it legitimizes them. Democracy lends legitimacy.

 

Mark Collett: Now, I’m quite the opposite.

 

And I’ll tell you why. If you had 98% of the voter in public went and wrote all rubbish on their ballot paper, they’d have to say the Labour candidate was elected with 1.2% of the vote.

 

And I think that would be a problem for legitimacy. Far more than Labour were elected with 52% of the vote. 90% stayed at home, though.

 

David Clews: I just think the whole democracy. Democracy is a scam!

 

I mean, that was one of the I was reading about the Dune novels and one of the things they said about it is how Frank Herbert showed that people will intrinsically return to basic form. I mean, democracy is, I think, in years to come, people look back and say, what was that all about? For hundreds of thousands of years, you had a leader and you had a people and that was basically it. If you went back 200 years ago and said:

 

“Well, what are you Left-wing? Are you Right-wing? Are you conservative?”

 

They’d be like:

 

“What? I’m out working to put food on my table!”

 

Personally, I think democracy is used as a tool of subversion.

 

Whereas it should be really the strongest in society should rule. And if somebody else wants to come along and overthrow them, then they have to be stronger.

 

But again, look, maybe I’m a bit black pilled by White. I don’t knock people who still vote. I understand why they still do it. It’s like if you look at dissidents during movement, say dissidents in East Germany, like, people still stayed, they still worked, you know, they put out books in their spare time, you know, you. I would be the one jumping over the wall and sitting in West Berlin smoking a cigar, like, do you know what I mean?

 

So I’m not going to be a complete dickhead. I understand why people vote, but I personally think that it’s wrong and it legitimizes the corruption of the system.

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, different answers there. Me and Natty, obviously the same, but Tollah is voting. David’s not all legitimate answers. It’s up to every person. I always advise. If there’s not a nationalist candidate, spoil your ballot paper.

 

But I think it’s better to have a say than just to be a guy that stayed at home. But everyone’s entitled to their own opinions.

 

Let’s do these Superchats. If you haven’t Superchatted, there’s still 45 minutes of the show left.

 

Obviously, we might run over five minutes if we get too many. I’m hoping not to run over by a long period because these guys are here and it’s boiling hot. It’s about 25 degrees in this room and I feel like I’m about to melt. Open Borders for Israel, $5.

 

The Ayatollah: Thanks so much.

 

Mark Collett: He said:

 

“Did you see the US government designated Nordic Resistant Movement as a terrorist group?”

 

We’ll go around the group on this very quickly. I saw that. I’m sure everyone else did. I find this utterly disgusting! The Nordic Resistance are a registered party in Sweden. They stand in elections and they’ve just been like:

 

“Whoa! Well, there you go. They’re terrorists!”

 

Absolutely scandalous.

 

But I think one of the reasons behind that is to stop international resistance forming. Because now there isn’t any nationalist group in America who can support the Nordic Resistance. Because if they do you know, if they Superchat to a Nordic Resistance, show anything like that could lead to them being prosecuted for supporting a terrorist group. But absolutely scandalous! And the guy who’s done it is obviously Anthony Blinken, who is jewish. Again, it’s jewish power flexing its muscles to attack any form of resistance. What do the rest of you guys think on this?

 

Natty: It definitely has the fear of ZOG lashing out blindly. I’m not sure. Maybe there are machinations I don’t understand. But like you said, they’re a registered party in Sweden, so this just seems really silly to me. And you’re right, it does cut that tie between America and Europe.

 

But I just get the impression that ZOG is just fighting on too many fronts and it’s struggling to contain it. And a move like this, to me, just reeks of that desperation and stupidity.

 

The Ayatollah: Yes, I’ve not got a lot to say. Your summary of it is correct. Mark, just to elaborate or just to add a bit to what Nat is saying there, I think the concern for the current occupation in terms of using everything as a vassal for Israeli interests and jewish interests is certainly Israeli interests geopolitically in that they haven’t got either the young Left or the young Right under control. They had the Right 25 years ago in that age group. They haven’t now. They’re going to probably not find it that easy to get it back, and they’re certainly not going to have the Left. I think that is a big concern from just picking up on what Nat was saying about fighting on too many fronts. That’s a problem that isn’t going to go away. It’s only going to get worse.

 

David Clews: Yeah, I mean, it’s just ridiculous banning these groups.

 

I mean, the problem is it does work because the media are calling them a “terror group”.

 

Therefore, the vast majority of people will read all, a terrorist group’s been banned. It’s a bit like the way they’ve done that here as well with all these, like, even, like his boot to rear. Like, I mean, obviously I’m not a fan of his boot to rear, but they weren’t terrorist group. The band, them, like, they’ll just keep throwing this around and mud sticks at the end of the day and most people will just see the superficial. Well, the band, a terrorist group, one of their members once knew somebody who went somewhere and spoke it breathed air just like Anders Behring Breivik, you know, that’s. They know exactly the game to play. They just throw enough mud out there.

 

But as Natty said, it is a very good point. Like, all the fronts that are being fought on a war in Gaza, war with Hezbollah in the north, a war with people over there, a war with Iran. It is more like the machinations of someone lashing out than someone who’s in power and really in control.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you for that. JakesChannel gave $5 and says:

 

“What a fantastic lineup. Cannot wait to watch. Thanks for putting on a great show, Mark.”

 

Well, thank you for supporting it. Jakes, really nice to see you here tonight. D sound seven gave $10. Thank you so much, my friend. He said:

 

“Conservatives delenda est!”

 

Or is it delenda est? Conservatives.

 

I can’t remember which way round the Latin goes, but basically he’s saying:

 

“Death to the Conservatives!”

 

Well, I think that may be happening. And you will see the last thing the Conservatives will see is the grinning face of Nigel Farage as he pours mud into their open grave. Merry Englander gave $5 and said:

 

“Greetings all!”

 

Thank you so much! AlbionForever said:

 

“Don’t forget Tollah is also a rapper. There might be somebody requesting some Tollah rap later.”

 

I don’t know, but that might happen. RoryHerbert gave $5. Thank you so much!:

 

“Just a thought. Mark Collett, I would appreciate your comments on Just Stop Oil spraying orange paint on Stonehenge earlier today. I’ve got a lot of respect for the woman who intervened.”

 

What is the panel’s opinion? I’m going to Fed post now, so if you want to leave the panel, you can.

 

But I got to say this. If I was at Stonehenge with my family and I saw people spraying orange paint over something that’s, I don’t know when it was built. I don’t know when Stonehenge was built, but it was a long time ago and it’s an integral part of our culture. It’s a historic landmark that inspires all the world over. And if I saw these daft idiots spraying it orange, I think I’d run over and punch one of them.

 

And anyone that does run over and punch one of these people who are destroying priceless works of European art, destroying cultural, historical sites, they deserve having a pint bought for them, not being prosecuted.

 

So yeah, my advice is, if you see them, I will buy you a pint. If you punch them. If you see somebody destroying Stonehenge, it’s your moral duty to stop them.

 

Natty: Let me just say as well, I mean, as shocking as it is, it shouldn’t be surprising the people responsible for this have destroyed or attempting to destroy our history, our culture and our people. Cultural vandalism is just small fry to them. And the people who did this work for a lady called Margaret Klein, Salomon. Okay. She’s jewish, so that’s all I’m going to say.

 

David Clews: Yeah, I think with a lot of these psy ops, I think with a lot of them, it’s actually best to ignore them because there’s so many of them now. Like, they’re always up to stuff. These Just Stop Oil people, I think obviously if they engage in criminal damage, they should be arrested.

 

But I think the media actually deliberately pushes Just Stop Oil because that’s part of the net. The Net Zero agenda is to stop oil. So people do stuff all the time. The media will always push Just Stop Oil. They’ll always push these stupid stunts.

 

I think the best thing for these people is to not give them the oxygen of publicity.

 

And I think the fact that the media does give them so much publicity, I think it’s part of the wider Net Zero, because then they can say:

 

“Well, look, people are so outraged that the lack of moves towards a sustainable, decarbonised economy.”

 

And like the one I noticed, like Ash Sarkar, like the stuff she says as well, these people are the suffragettes of the 21st century and like Owen Jones will use that one as well.

 

So they’re these Just Stop Oil people are actually doing the bidding of the state because they agree with kind of the same things, but yet lock them up and throw away the key.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, I posted about this earlier when I saw it and basically just. I put it quite simply, I said, if you polled native Britons, I reckon about a third of them would be in favour of people like that. I’ll put it more politely than it is on Telegram being tried and then publicly executed under a benevolent state. I really do. That’s how angry it makes people. That’s how much contempt people have for it because it’s not a popular agenda in the first place. Setting aside, and yeah, David may well have a point. Setting aside, know David’s kind of ideas.

 

And again, he may well be right as to why this is promoted as much as it is. The question I would have there is why the kind of idea of and I’d be open to. Not the discussion for now, but I’d be open to kind of theories on this. Why the effort to kind of get publicity for this through something which is massively unpopular, you would think it’d be counterproductive. But maybe there’s a long game there that like, is beyond my comprehension. It may well be.

 

David Clews: All publicity is good publicity. I think it’s like a suffragette style situation. What was Emily Pankhurst? She threw herself in front of the horse. Everyone would have been whereas now she’s a hero. So I think. Yeah, yeah. About Emily Pankhurst, though, I’ll tell you.

 

Mark Collett: This, the day just stop wheel, go and vandalise an actual state building or.

 

Natty: You know, Holocaust memorial.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, a Holocaust memorial or something like that. That’ll be the day they start arresting them. You know, when they go to the Holocaust memorial, the local synagogue, the local mosque, that’s when they’re arresting them, when they’re doing it to churches. Stonehenge, European works of art. It’s all fun and games before because the system hates us. Simpler, ItWasMadeUp, gave 1488. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“Great lineup!”

 

Well, thank you so much! Stan1 gave $14. Thanks so much, said:

 

“Great show and great guests. As my granddad once said, embrace the struggle, enjoy the decline!”

 

Thank you so much! ThinRedLine said:

 

“Very interesting.”

 

$14. Thank you so much, my friend. And Eddie gave $16 and said:

 

“Thanks for the stream. Great lineup.”

 

Well, thank you so much! ThinRedLine gave $5, said:

 

“This should be an extra long show.”

 

Well, thank you so much, my friend.

 

Natty: Hold on, hold on. I’ve just had a thought, Mark. You know, you could make about 20% extra on Superchats if we changed 14.88 to 25.66 or something. You know, maybe you’d make $5 a Superchat instead of 14.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, yeah. Maybe we could go even further. 44, 55 or something.

 

David Clews: The problem will be inflation. It will soon be worth, like, nothing. You know, that’s the or it’ll be 1488 quid they’ll have to give you to make it worthwhile.

 

The Ayatollah: Just switch it around for now. 8814.

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, if people keep.

 

The Ayatollah: Call it on the drift again, if.

 

Mark Collett: People keep sending in questions, we will answer every question. We always do that within reason. Obviously, if people are sending in joke, you know, two Odysee token Superchats, that doesn’t count. RoryHerbert gave a dollar. Thank you so much, said:

 

“My American wife met Nigel Farage in 2015 at a UK conference and asked him who he was supporting for the 2016 US election. Nigel replied, Rand Paul. My wife replied that he should support Donald Trump. He shortly changed his mind and must have made a fair amount of money on that advice.”

 

Thank you so much, Rory. I think Farage, just as an aside, I think Farage and Trump were kind of made for each other. I think they are pretty much cut from the same cloth, and I think they’re more interested in many ways in their own sort of destiny and the power that they’re going to receive and their place in history than they are actually what they’re pushing for. And my assertion about Nigel is, I think he is somebody who feels awfully scorned because the system won’t acknowledge him.

 

And the fact the system won’t acknowledge him is something that angers him to the point that he’s now saying, I want to destroy the system to force the Conservative to acknowledge me. I think it’s his anger at the fact a lot of this is is his anger at the fact people won’t acknowledge him. But him and Trump are very similar. I think Trump only fought that first presidential election because people mocked him and said:

 

“You’ll never be able to stand for president.”

 

He was like:

 

“Well, just watch me.”

 

I think there’s a lot of ego in this.

 

David Clews: Sometimes I think I’m guilty of that as well. Like, I think maybe even these people don’t even know that they’re playing a role on the chessboard. Like, they’re doing it for a different reason. And you’re right. They said that when Trump decided to run was when. Remember, they do that roast at Washington and Obama said:

 

“That’s one thing about me is I’m president. That’s one thing you’ll never be as president.”

 

And they said after that was when Trump really, really said:

 

“I’m going to stand, that I’m going to win!”

 

And it’s used to say with Farage, like, these people love honours. Like, he’s probably embittered, he’s not a sir. And it’s such a dif, they just have a different mindset, I think, to the vast majority of us and people who are genuine, they want, it’s like Starmer with all the tool maker stuff. Like, he, remember the people started laughing when he mentioned it. The people were clearly laughing because he brings it up all the time. Starmer went on and complained. He went, I can’t believe in this day and age, people are still laughing that my daddy was a tool maker. He’s a lunatic. Starmer’s a nut job. They operate in just a completely different world, I think, from normal people.

 

Mark Collett: I agree. Does anyone want to add to that? Tollah, I’ve got you.

 

The Ayatollah: Sure?

 

Mark Collett: Unmuted.

 

The Ayatollah: No, nothing to add, mate. Nothing to add.

 

Mark Collett: Okay.

 

The Ayatollah: Just basically agreement on the point of they’re not always. Sorry, just to say they’re not always conscious of the ways in which they’re perhaps being used. Yeah, but I kind of made a similar point earlier on myself, but, yeah, I do agree with that. Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: Okay. The Resident Baker gave $10. Thank you so much!:

 

“An excellent show tonight, gentlemen.”

 

Well thank you very much, my friend, for the support. It’s Okay to be a Nationalist gave $25. Thank you so much! He said:

 

“If six pointed Starmer and his handlers are so smart, they’d reduce immigration by 5% and say to the media, we’ve reduced immigration! Normies will think he’s a messiah. Great lineup, great show!”

 

There is some debate on this, and that was a generous, supercharged, let’s just say this. There are some people who do believe that under Labour, there will be a reduction of immigration. I don’t think there will be. I think once they’re in power, all things like the like Tories would lie, at least lie and say:

 

“Look, we’re going to do the Rwanda plan, we want to stop the boat. We’re trying to reduce this.”

 

I can’t remember who it was. I think it was one of our guys wrote to their MP saying:

 

“Look, this is all a load of rubbish!”

 

And their MP wrote back and said:

 

“No, no, no. Since we brought in the Rwanda plan, you know, we’ve seen a reduction in people trying to cross the channel. This is working. Part of its a deterrent.”

 

I think once Labour are in the veneer of, we want to do something, will be completely removed. Most of their people are hardcore anti-White. Bring them all in at any cost.

 

And I think under Labour it will get worse. And the reason I believe that is because it has got worse under every successive government. If you track, you know, from the late 1970s to now, you can see an upward trend in migration. And I can’t see that turning around under a government that have done it, that when in opposition, did everything they could to basically.

 

Basically stop any form of migration control that the Tories pretended to bring in.

 

I don’t know if you guys have got any takes on that, or if.

 

Natty: You think just very quickly, over the winter, the Tories claimed that they were stopping the small boats, basically because the weather was so bad that they weren’t crossing the channel. And the lying scumbags in the Tory Party were happy to claim that as a victory.

 

So the Superchatter, I can’t remember his name is, right, yes, they could reduce it by 1%, and they would happily claim that as a kind of win that they could publish in their newspapers.

 

Mark Collett: I remember that, actually. I remember people saying:

 

“You’ve not slowed it down, all you’ve done is capitalised on the weather.”

 

David Clews: That’s one thing, David, I really nailed very early on, is the whole Hegelian dialect. Problem, reaction, solution. They create the problem, they then create the reaction, and then they provide the solution. Yeah.

 

Starmer is utterly shameless in his pursuit of power. Like, say what you want about Corbyn, Corbyn was a genuine Lefty, right? He believed in all this stuff. He wasn’t bought and paid for. He was ultimately very weak, which was why he failed to stand up to the media. But Starmer is a completely empty vessel. And even I think Starmer is even more dangerous than Blair, because Blair, there was something Machiavellian about Blair. Like, Blair loved the power, whereas with Starmer, he is this empty vessel.

 

I mean, I actually have the theory that Starmer was a closet homosexual because he didn’t marry till his forties. Both of his girlfriends he had throughout his life were both Zionists. And he was knighted.

 

And then he meets this nice Israeli lady. I think he’s been groomed for this position. And he was obvious a member of the Trilateral Commission, which is one of these big international NGO’s. He did that whole one with Emily Maitlis. Who would you prioritize, Davos or Westminster? And he said Davos. You know, he is this empty vessel that’s so easy to be shaped.

 

And I think he’s very dangerous. Starmer, more so than any of any of the rest of them.

 

The Ayatollah: Closeted homosexual. A bit like his lookalike, a certain Mr Spencer.

 

David Clews: Supposedly.

 

Natty: Hardly, hardly closeted anymore, is he?

 

The Ayatollah: Who?

 

Mark Collett: Spencer?

 

The Ayatollah: He’s not home when the rubber hits the road.

 

Natty: That’s hot stuff. You can get that at many places.

 

The Ayatollah: Is he really not as intelligent as you think you are?

 

Anyway, enough from me.

 

Mark Collett: No, he’s not.

 

David Clews: As long as there’s no kissing with tongues, it’s not gay. That’s what I heard. At least. That’s the man trial.

 

Mark Collett: What I’ve heard about Richard Spencer is that he. Quite the opposite of that. I’ve actually heard that he’s a bit of a stallion, that he’s a bit of a lady killer, that when the ladies are around big Richard, they know who’s in town. I’ll tell you. That’s what I’ve heard.

 

David Clews: I like Richard Spencer.

 

The Ayatollah: We’re not allowed to like no one else.

 

Natty: The five head herself.

 

David Clews: Richard Spencer is quite funny because the more I look back on it, when he started supporting Biden and supporting the, like, Ukraine war, I actually have a bit of respect for that because he obviously went very contrarian. So I like listening to. I think he’s very, very bright guy, but very narcissistic, though I think it’s fair to say.

 

Mark Collett: Look, I’m going to say this. I had a bit of a fallout with Richard Spencer live on air, on an episode of the Kill Stream, where we ended up in a little bit of acrimony because he been somebody who’d supported the Covid narrative. And I ended up debating a little bit on. It ended in acrimony, but I’ve always said this since then. He’s the one person I never really wanted to end up debating because I always actually really liked Richard and admired what he did. I thought he put his points over really well. I thought he presented himself in a good way and I don’t want that. I don’t want people in the movement who are high value people going the way he did. Sort of pro-Covid restrictions, pro-Biden, etcetera. He seemed to just go complete contrarian into this mad spiral when he realised that ethno-nationalism wasn’t going to get him exactly where he wanted to overnight. And I found that disappointing.

 

And I’ve always held him in high regard for what he did when he was in the movement.

 

And I think it’s a big loss to the movement that he isn’t with us. You know, a lot of people don’t like that take. They don’t like Richard anymore. I tend to quite like him. I still view him quite fondly. I don’t think he’s gay.

 

Glen19, gave $2. Thanks:

 

“What do you think about the White nationalist rally in Detroit over the weekend? I saw it on Japanese news media over here. It looked very more multiracial. I expect, however, Jared Taylor and Delta David Duke were there. Many may hate Fuentes for being a castizo, but it looks like he’s doing well.”

 

I don’t hate Nick Fuentes and I had a big argument on my Telegram with people were very angry with me for saying what I said about him because I said it was sad that his event got cancelled. He’d sold 2,000 tickets. He had 100 strong team setting up at the venue. They cancelled it at the last minute. The venue called the police, threw them all out. Wouldn’t even let them get their stuff out. Absolute scandal!

 

And I think it’s terrible! I think it’s sad. I think it’s sad for the team. And I’ve been in that position where you’re putting on an event, people start bombarding the venue with abuse and the next thing the venue turns on you and you’ve got to pull something together because you’ve got all those people there.

 

And I’ll say this, I can understand that some people don’t like him personally. They might have a personal thing against him. They might say:

 

“He’s not my cup of tea. I don’t like him because of this. I don’t like his sort of whole Catholic thing or whatever.”

 

But I don’t understand why anyone would wish defeat upon a young man who spends the vast majority of his time talking about two things, White genocide and jewish power. He’s putting on a conference with, 20,000 people there, two of whom are Jared Taylor and David Duke. You know, when it comes down to it, I wish him all the best. You know, other people there, like Keith Woods, Jake Shields, there’s plenty of people there.

 

So I don’t really and I hope that America First go on to sue that venue to the point where the venue has to shut down and they end up owning it. That would be my ideal outcome for this. And like, I know Nick Fuentes doesn’t like me. I know that people always say:

 

“Well, he would never come out and bat for you, Mark.”

 

Well, maybe he wouldn’t. Maybe he wouldn’t. Maybe he doesn’t like me.

 

But I’m not going to say anything bad about him. And I feel for him, I feel for his team, and I hope they get justice over this scandalous abuse of power.

 

Natty: Well, I know you’re not going to say anything bad about him, but at the risk of being the bad guy here, Nick Fuentes did a deal with Ali Alexander for political power and a time when he knew that Ali Alexander was basically a paedophile and was preying on his fan base. And Nick Fuentes gave him access to this.

 

So it’s very hard for people who know about the backstory of this to support Fuentes, even though he says the right things. This is a guy who’s done very, …

 

David Clews: Did someone not do a deal with Ernst Rohm to get power?

 

Natty: Okay.

 

Mark Collett: Natty literally has been put in his place.

 

David Clews: And I see that if you are in the ruthless pursuit of power, then sometimes you perhaps have to do deals with people that you might not like or agree with. You know, is that is like, I mean, look, obviously that stuff you, I wouldn’t do it. You wouldn’t do it.

 

But, you know, do we not maybe need to be a bit more Machiavellian as Fuente is not quite Machiavellian.

 

Natty: In that way, not in my opinion. And you could do deals with unpleasant people, but brown paedophiles? No, I’m drawing a line on that one.

 

David Clews: But see, the thing about Fuentes as well, I quite like him as well. I think he’s very charismatic. But is it not that he reflects young people and young people live in a multiracial world? People were criticising him, saying, look at all the foreigners. What was he meant to do? Like, these are people he obviously does speak out about White people being in charge. He speaks about Christians being in Charlie. What is he supposed to say? Well, you’re not allowed to come along because you’re not White. What should he do in these situations?

 

Natty: No no no. I’m not saying any of that. They’re all good points. And Mark’s made good points as well.

 

And none of what you guys are saying isn’t true.

 

But this is a guy who gave Ali Alexander knowing who Ali Alexander was, access to his fan base and access to the people who followed him and looked up to him. And that for me is totally reprehensible and is like a line that just should never be crossed.

 

Mark Collett: Do you have any points to make on that, Tollah?

 

The Ayatollah: No, not really. Just sat with a popcorn.

 

Mark Collett: Okay.

 

David Clews: This is not a bit like Baron Harkonnen, like sometimes you need to offer up a young boy as a sacrifice. You know.

 

The Ayatollah: I really do.

 

Natty: David, I really hope you.

 

David Clews: I’m joking.

 

Mark Collett: This is what I like, having David Clews on. He’s the guy that you expect utter maturity and professionalism from, but he will. He never fails to shock and amaze when the time comes.

 

So yeah, thank you for everyone’s points on that. ThinRedLine gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Democracy equals plutocracy!”

 

Thank you so much! AlbionForever gave an odysee token. Thank you so much!

 

“If you Just Stop Oil did a protest as a synagogue that have to be renamed Just Stop Moil!”

 

Thank you very much.

 

The Ayatollah: Do you hear any story? There was a story about a Moyle. There was a story about a Moyle in Crown Heights, not far from where those tunnels were discovered at the start of the year, this moil. And he’d been going to work drunk and he got the sack.

 

Natty: Do you know, before this dream started, I realised I was going to have to keep a sharp eye on your jokes because a lot of them just fly over my head, especially when you’re referencing Brittany pop.

 

But that was good. That’s a good one. We’ll take that.

 

The Ayatollah: Cheers. You’re welcome.

 

Mark Collett: Wife Waffen gave $7. Thank you so much, my dear. She said:

 

“Good morning. Hope you have a great week.”

 

Thank you very much. Katie Fanning’s Padded Cell gave $3. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“Do you think Kenny’s party and Alec’s party will form a coalition majority in the next general election? They think. So now can we get an impression from our true leader, the Ayatollah of Alec Yearbury?”

 

The Ayatollah: No, I can’t do an impression of Yearbury. I’m afraid I can’t. It always reminds me of the guy is it Paul Dempsey who used to host the boxing on what is now TNT Sport? But that’s a very obscure reference that no one’s going to get and that’s not going to be satisfactory to people but I think they’ve formed a thing there’s a new division he’s formed continuing the kind of military autism theme called and it’s got an acronym it’s tactical observation surveys and special expeditionary reconnaissance service.

 

So it’s TOSSERS. Yeah, I got that.

 

David Clews: Can I just say as well like from an outside perspective. Like I speak to a lot of people, I try and maintain good relations with as many people. I understand if you’re in the trenches there’s going to be. I find it quite disappointing that there is and I don’t like seeing the whole. There’s so much division. I just, I do think a lot of it is really down to and I was talking about this the other night I think a lot of it is down to the lack of money and this wider movement that we’re in.

 

If you look at the Labour Party so many of these people would love to probably strangle each other but at the end of the day they’re an MP, they’ve got ninety! A year in an office in London or they’re a researcher, they’ve got 30 year. I mean you imagine if we as a movement were able to pay just what I see, a wider nationalist movement. You were able to pay 50 people 25, 30 grand a year. I mean you’re not buying silence. You’re going to have people more likely to just say:

 

“Well look, we’re going to have to do this.”

 

And again, any sort of fledgling revolutionary movement from history, it’s had a lot of money whether it was on the Right, whether it was on the left. Whereas you know, now people spend their money on their holidays, they spend their money on going to the football. You know that’s why I do see this and I’m glad to see people support you, Mark, people need to support content creators. They need to because it just becomes a situation where you do like the easiest thing to do is just go and show for Israel like I could just turn my Twitter off tonight and just become Ollie of London and just start, you know, push and you get 10, 20 grand a month. You know, doing what we do is so hard.

 

And I think there’s a lot of energy and frustration and again, fundamentally, intellects, which is one of the problems, I think, on this wider movement, which does have a lot of different aspects of it, and it is hard to keep it united because you have a lot of very intelligent people.

 

Mark Collett: Look, I say this.

 

One of the things I do find tiring is this constant nonsense where people say:

 

“Oh, it’s the grift, mate, it’s the grift. People do it for an easy life.”

 

Well, you can total up the donations I made on the stream tonight so far, and it’s under $200. You know, that’s not if it was ten times that, I could understand people saying:

 

“Oh, the grift, it’s an easy life!”

 

Look, but it’s not an easy life. And outside of really those huge American shows where the big American donors are chucking in huge, huge sort of silly kind of money, there isn’t vast sums of money in this. And I don’t know anyone that’s really come out of ethno-nationalism as a millionaire. It just doesn’t happen. To suggest that people have put their lives, families, etc., at risk. They, you know, some people have been jailed, they’ve lost their bank accounts and then people are whining because there’s a couple of Superchats over a two hour stream. It’s pathetic, to be honest!

 

The Ayatollah: Same people will pay for Netflix and whatever else in a lot of cases as well. Not all of them, but a lot of them. I mean, we used to get called grifters on the Tasob podcast when we didn’t even take donations. So frankly, people talk out their asses.

 

Natty: Well, the, I mean, you’ve, Mark, you’ve kind of answered your own question, or you’ve answered David’s question there. The reason we’re ideologues, we have an ideology, that’s why we can’t get on with each other. And because we’re rigid and hard line and there’s no money in it. There’s grifters could get on with each other. If you’re making a hell of a lot of money, you’d be willing to compromise and do things with other grifters of a different stripe. But no, we’re not in that channel.

 

David Clews: That’s an excellent point, Natty, because in my shows, I show the sort of nexus, the way they’re all linked, like Russell Brands, all LinkedIn, Joe Rogan, they all, Trigernometry, they all go on each other’s shows. They all benefit each other. And they will never actually have an honest conversation about race. They would never have an honest conversation about the role of jewish power in the world.

 

And again, I don’t necessarily see my points out of anything ideological. These are just real. It’s like saying:

 

“This is a bottle of water. And then well, actually, it’s not. It’s a plastic.”

 

You know, these people are doing everything they possibly can to evade talking about what is really going on. It’s so annoying because when you actually talk about what is really going on, people want to go and listen to, like, Russell Brand or they want to go and listen to Alex Jones. It lulls them into this sense of security that. All right. Okay. That’s easier for me to understand what’s going. Look, here is the problem. This is why. This is the history. They don’t want to know about it.

 

Mark Collett: Right.

 

Next Superchat, Katie Fanning’s Padded Cell gave another $3. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Also.”

 

Natty: That’s your takes.

 

Mark Collett: Also, could Tollah do the dead man shoes scene, but instead have Marcus Richard and Tommy Robinson as the other guy? That would be class.

 

The Ayatollah: I can try. So what was it? Marcus Richard. Right. Okay. I’ll have a go. Bear with me a second.

 

Mark Collett: I love this scene.

 

Natty: Is this the scene where he gets out the car?

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, that’s the one.

 

David Clews: Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah.

 

The Ayatollah: If you’ll bear with me a second while I find me text so, I can’t remember it off the top me head. I’m liable to.

 

Mark Collett: I really like the film Dead Man’s Shoes. And the film-maker, he really did. He really did sort of sum up these sort of like sink that.

 

The Ayatollah: The sink.

 

Mark Collett: Estate. Life in these bad areas and how people live. I thought it was really well made.

 

Natty: Yeah.

 

The Ayatollah: Small.

 

Natty: Small town thugs. Yeah.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: The fact they’re all driving around in that crap old car, you know.

 

The Ayatollah: Well, I’ll give it a go. Yeah. Okay. So I’ll check. I’ll change the names accordingly if I remember to as well. Right:

 

“Well, mate, how you doing, Mark? You okay? Yeah. You know, the lads of this ridiculous idea that. Yeah, it was me. I was for. So we up to mooching about. Mooching about in my house? Yeah. Jaws pipe. Men like women. What are you doing, lad? That’s my concern. Not when you’re in my house. Where are you staying? Motson’s farm. You’re gonna come and see me, are you? Maybe I will. Not Friday me? Are you just all chinning? Hang on. He’s weighing it up. He’s weighing it up. Shut up! Making me very nervous, Mark. Well, you should be. If I were you, I’d get in that fucking car and I get out of here, man. And I gather them goonies and get whatever you’ve got and come at me. Cause believe me, I’m gonna fucking hit you all. I don’t like being threatened, Mark. Not threatening you, mate. It’s beyond fucking words! Watched over you when you were asleep and I looked at your fucking neck and I was that far away from slicing it. You’re fucking there, mate. So get in that car and fuck off! You get to me first. I just might.”

 

Oh, yeah. That’s it!

 

Doesn’t really work.

 

Mark Collett: I like the way you added the sniffs for Tommy.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, I had to ad lib the odd bit of it as well.

 

But, yeah, it doesn’t quite carry over because you can’t really imagine Tommy Robinson speaking in a hushed voice, can you?

 

Mark Collett: You can’t. Gus in Lanzarote gave $5. Gus, I have posted your items. And he said:

 

“The Reform candidate resigned just for saying vote. Resigned just for saying vote BNP in 2010. Even Sivnat Sargon stood up to the liberal media bullies about online comments because boomers have had lives of security. Does this give a dread of being an outsider? Pariah. Pariah. >Hence they cuck.”

 

Yeah. What do you guys think about this? One of these Reform candidates has actually resigned and walked away. And he’s been hounded out just for saying that people should vote BNP 14 years ago.

 

Natty: At some point they’re going to run out. They’re going to run out of clean cut candidates and everyone’s going to have said something like:

 

“Yeah, maybe we shouldn’t have fought the Nazis, or, yeah, maybe the BNP were right about immigration.”

 

Or whatever.

 

So, yeah, there’s a limit. How many people Hope Not Hate can highlight for them to kick out. And some people are going to fold. People have their own considerations. But at some point that does start losing power and doxing starts losing power and all this kind of opposite research starts losing power. It is powerful, don’t get me wrong. And people, like I said, people are going to walk away, but at some point, that just doesn’t hold sway anymore.

 

The Ayatollah: Well, Reformed a good term for this in their statement, didn’t they? Sorry, just a quick point. They termed it in their statement after what Ian Gribbon, who, by the way, incidentally, half jewish, their candidate for Backs Hill and Battle, who said the things about we should have stayed neutral with regard to Germany in the forties, thirties and forties. They had a good term for it. They called it “offence archaeology”. And I mean, actually that their statement, and anyone can go and find it, they basically said:

 

“Look, he’s saying something that people thought was true at the time and it probably is true, we’re not endorsing it, but it is true.”

 

So it was an amazing statement. They put out, like, a lot of us would have been proud of that statement. They played that one quite well and I was surprised they would say something so basically heretical to say, we shouldn’t have fought them, we should have stayed out of that wall and objectively we would have been better off doing that.

 

But yeah, there we are.

 

David Clews: I think anything that’s done to shrink the Overton Window is bad. Thing is, if you’re going to cut to Hope Not Hate, if you’re going to allow Nick Molé’s to decide, are you honestly going to come in and you’re going to take down the international power structure? It just shows you how weak they are.

 

And I actually had a bit of a not falling out. I got annoyed the other week at Galloway’s party. They kicked a guy out because apparently he made Islamophobic comments and I actually got in touch. I said:

 

“Look, this guy’s clearly done nothing wrong here. Why are you playing that game?”

 

It’s just, it has to be. If people have said things that Hope Not Hate, find offensive, no one should ever buckle to these people on anything. Obviously, if it’s something that is beyond the pale, like say an Ali Alexander situation or something like that, or the conduct of a candidate, that’s very different. But on free speech, people expressing an opinion on the Second World War on anything, you have to stick by your candidates and your people and not throw them under a bus.

 

Mark Collett: Thank you so much! Snake, Using a Real Snake, gave $5.

 

Thank you very much. And said:

 

“I feel a system have wheeled out Farage to take the energy from those who voted for the Tories. In 2019, Labour will take a big win as a licenced to make huge unannounced, pre-planned seismic changes to society via the 1997 CP to Hitchens.”

 

I think we’ve all said that actually, is that. I mean thank you for the Superchat, but I do believe that is literally the point we’ve all made tonight. Would you all agree?

 

Natty: Yeah, Tony Blair didn’t stand on mass immigration, but that’s what we got.

 

So you’re going to get the same thing here.

 

Mark Collett: A Snake, Using a Real Snake gave another $10. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Keir Starmer is largely funded by a Trevor Chin, president of Israel based UJIA [United Jewish Israel Appeal], and he’s also on the executive board of Viacom, the largest Israel lobby group in the UK. Viacom is headed by a Richard Peter. Who was formerly employed by the Israeli prime minister’s office. And it is still an IDF reserve.”

 

I didn’t know any of that. Did any of you guys know that? I’m actually going to make a note of that.

 

David Clews: Yeah. Yeah. One of Starmer’s other biggest funders, a guy called Gary Lubner and whose son is now head of Labour Youth, Gary Lubner was brought up in South Africa. Auto glass. Ran the auto glass chair. Ultra, ultra Zionist. I think he gave. Let me actually tell you how much Jack Lubner. Sorry, Gary Lubner gave to Labour. Gary Lubner Labour. He gave 13 million quid to the Labour Party. A guy called Gary Lubner. So like, Starmer’s Left-wing Zionist control, Keir Starmer and that they bankrolled him. Huge sums of money. 13 million this guy’s given to Starmer.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I’ve just Googled that Viacom, you know, British Israel communications and research centre. And yeah, if that is all true and he’s being funded by them, I mean he tells you everything you need to know, really. Ants Alligate $5. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Happy that four of my favourite lads are together on PWR tonight. Loving David Clews, Unity News channel. I rely on him for the real news now. He has a unique presentation style that I really enjoy. Big hit with the ladies.”

 

David Clews: David, how do you feel to be expected? Happens to me if I can get home without being accosted by gangs of gorgeous 20 something women. It’s a good day.

 

Mark Collett: Very good. Jay Bradley gave $5. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“Communism, capitalism are two sides of the same coin. Both are jewish. They’re in too deep. No voting our way out of this one.”

 

Well, thank you very much. The David Clews fan there. AlbionForever. I know we would have done that one. Scaredycat. $4. Thank you so much!:

 

“Hi, David. Ayatollah Natty and Mark, is it possible to introduce Sheikh Imran Hussein to Mark? I think your newspaper interviewed him. Right now he’s in Malaysia, then Indonesia onto Armenia and then Russia, eventually to stop over in England on his way home. To Trinidad, the Caribbean island. He organised emigration.”

 

But if there’s people that are interesting, I will talk to them. I get into trouble for doing this. I did the Dilly Hussein interview. People were very angry about that. At one point, I spoke to those black lads down in London. I really enjoyed the trip down there for the day. That was interesting. And I’ve said to other people that I would be more than happy to have Muslims on here.

 

In fact, I actually did an interview with a member of the Syrian government during the war in Syria when that was on. And that was an interesting. That was an interesting chat. And he was literally saying:

 

“Look, you know, we don’t want our people going over to the UK. We’re against you guys disappearing, you know.”

 

Very interesting.

 

So, yeah, I’d be open to that. Does anyone want to add anything to this?

 

David Clews: No. No, I don’t know. Who is he? Who is he?

 

Mark Collett: I have to Google him.

 

David Clews: Just on. Without mentioning the name, there’s actually some news that’s come out tonight that the leader of Hezbollah, Hassan Nasrallah, has said that Cyprus is being used by the Israeli air force to launch attacks on Lebanon because geographically, Cyprus there. So he said:

 

“If a war takes place, then Cyprus would be within their crosshairs.”

 

Now, who, which country has a lot of Air Force bases on Cyprus? We do! These air forces are clearly being used.

 

So, yeah, have a look at the that stuff. He’s made a speech that’s being regarded as quite incendiary, that if, because it looks like Israel are going to launch. They’ve got bored of Gaza, they’re going to launch a ground operation in southern Lebanon.

 

And again, these Hezbollah aren’t Hamas. They’ve got, he says, 100,000 people. They’ve got some serious weapons and that if you want a pretext to war with Iran, well, we’ve got British interests on Cyprus. They’ve got missiles that can hit us.

 

Mark Collett: You know, look, I’ll tell you this as well, and I know it’s running over slightly, so we’ve got a couple more Superchats.

 

But one thing that has, or should be shocking the current world order is the way that these very expensive, very complex, state of the art tanks are getting completely wrecked both in the open battlefields of the Ukraine and in the cramped ruins of Gaza city. I have seen videos of Israeli tanks being, you know, dozens of them being destroyed by guys who have got state of the art, shoulder mounted, armour piercing rocket launchers. And you’re seeing a crew being completely, you know, turned to jam on the inside. And a piece of equipment that’s probably worth, I don’t know, a couple of million for a tank. Is a tank a couple of million?

 

Natty: Probably much, much more than a couple of million.

 

Mark Collett: Well, okay, well, let’s say it’s 10 million. How much is it to train the troops in there? How easy is to replace that once they’ve been trained? War is changing. And I would say this, the fact, and this is really for a different show, but the fact that the war cabinet in Israel is breaking down, I think it’s in no small part to the fact that they’ve rolled into Gaza and it hasn’t been the pushover they thought it was going to be. I think they’ve got spanked.

 

And the problem is, today you’ve got two types of war. You either obliterate from the air, and I mean obliterate to the point where literally nothing’s left. You know, there’s not a rat, there’s not a cockroach, nothing. Or you have a meat grinder. It’s either obliterate or your own troops are getting chewed up. It’s as simple as that.

 

David Clews: Well, that’s what Putin could have done that to Ukraine.

 

The Ayatollah: Or it’s Ukraine now.

 

David Clews: Yeah, that’s right. I mean, Putin could have flattened, they could flatten Kiev, they could flatten all these cities in Ukraine.

 

But again, not simping for Putin, but he clearly doesn’t do that.

 

And as you’re right, Mark, it’s either you just carpet bomb the place or you have a meat grinder. And that’s what it is.

 

And I think it’s just these people go on about how civilised they are. I think it’s a terrible situation that we are, 2024, and they’re leading us towards this war.

 

And I think I’ve met a lot of you guys. They talk about blood thirst and bloodlust. You know, I’ve never met anyone that says:

 

“Yet, war is a great thing. We need to do it!”

 

It’s crazy, crazy times.

 

Mark Collett: Right? AlbionForever said:

 

“Nativist bars.”

 

Thank you so much! Anti Mattoid gave $59.12.

 

Thank you so much for such a generous donation. And he said:

 

“Great show!”

 

Well, I’m pleased you enjoyed it so much, my friend. ScaredyCat gave $4.

 

Thank you very much. And said:

 

“Hi again, Mark, David, Ayatollah, Natty, Sheikh Imran Hussein. Samir was born in London but emigrated to Morocco and openly invites Muslims in the West on YouTube to settle back in Morocco, where he will help them establish themselves in their new country. Sheikh in previous years did this in Pakistan.”

 

Well, look, if you’ve got a Muslim scholar that wants to speak to me and you can put this guy in touch with me, and he is somebody who has the same opinion on us that we don’t want war between Christians and Muslims, but we do want a peaceful separation. You know, I don’t want a war, but I don’t want multiculturalism either. I don’t want a war because I want peaceful separation. And if there are Muslims or blacks or from any other racial group that have the same ethno-nationalist leanings as us and want a peaceful separation and a re-migration of people in the West to elsewhere in the world, I would absolutely hold out a hand of friendship and, yeah, that would be great! And I’m sure David would interview someone like as well, because David interviews anyone, usually with hilarious consequences.

 

David Clews: Anyway, you should be open.

 

The Ayatollah: Malaysia, then Indonesia, Armenia, Russia. Sorry. Go on, mate. Go on.

 

David Clews: You know, I think everyone should be open minded too. I think if there is a threat of a war, like, because clearly if there’s a war, it doesn’t matter if you’re a ethno-nationalists, civic nationalists or whatever, like, it’s not going to end well.

 

So I think if they do keep ramping this war rate to the cup, I think speaking with as many people as possible is healthy and to try and stop this.

 

Mark Collett: I agree. And the interesting thing with ethno-nationalism, real ethno-nationalism, you see, one last thing I’ll say to sum up on this issue, and everyone can have the same, we’ll close it down. We’re not going over by a massive amount of time. But genuinely, when I see the Tommy lads and like I said this about Anne Marie Waters a long time ago when she was talking about the need to invade Iran, the real hatred actually comes from these sort of civn ats who are playing the system’s game because they see Muslims.

 

And their natural response to the conflict between Whites and Muslims in this country is to level every single Muslim country in the Middle East, slaughter as many as possible, and they’re all cheering for that. I absolutely don’t want that! I understand that this conflict is created by the globalists in order to fracture, atomize and create a state where you will not have a homogeneous force that can overthrow the globalists.

 

Henceforth, we need peaceful separatism.

 

And one thing that we absolutely don’t want is more war, because more war creates refugees who end up coming. Coming here to the West, that is a succinct worldview. The worldview of, say, like the Tommy people or the Anne Marie Waters’ people when they’ve both, respectively pushed this line is one that ultimately leads to more problems and ironically, to more Muslim immigration.

 

So I would absolutely speak to these people.

 

Anyway, it’s been a wonderful show tonight.

 

I’d like to thank all these great guests, Natty, Tollah and David, if you’d all like to say you goodbyes, shill your own work. And then me and Natty have got our little gay announcement to come at the end and then we’ll shut things down.

 

Natty: Well, I’ll save my goodbyes until you make your announcement, but thanks, everyone. It’s been a pleasure.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, okay, I’ll be in forever.

 

Basically was being cheap. He was requesting for me to wrap when he did Nativist bars. So I’ll oblige him as quickly as I can with some that’s been sanitized.

 

So this is in character as Nativist is concerned:

 

“Been the scourge of the noses since I co-founded TASOB making more black sons and De Niro and Azov ZOG sweating buckets because I’m sticking the boot in. And I got more lines in the civn at from Luton. Catch me every month on the PA film review. World’s greatest movie critic for naming the jew. And I’m teaching young nationalists about strategy and planning a set of made up trials. Like Katie Fanning still telling all the birds about the Nat Soc solution. And I’m picking up more tens and Pearl Jams distribution. We’re going to save the White race and I’m the best of those trying. Best chapters lie ahead in the life of Ryan.”

 

That’s me done. Thanks for having me. Good night.

 

Mark Collett: Thank you, mate. David, shill your work and then me.

 

David Clews: And very, very impressive. Can I just say what absolutely fantastic show. Pleasure to be here with Tollah and Natty and yourself, Mark. Really interesting, deep, thorough conversation and it’s always good to be around people that have such a good knowledge and including the audience as well, that have a knowledge of what is going on. Like obviously some people will have different conclusions, they will interpret things differently.

 

But the thing that really pisses me off the most is so much of the Right, even the Left or whatever. It’s so superficial. There is no in depth analysis done on anything and it’s terrible! You need people more researched. You need people understanding. You need a penetrative analysis.

 

And that’s why I think conversations like this are so good! So thanks to everyone, and thanks very much for your audience for the warm welcome as well.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, we’ve got one little final announcement. Tonight, Natty, being a kind and loving brotherly friend, was good enough to gift me Helldivers 2, at the weekend on steam. So me and him are doing a special brotherly stream on Sunday night, killing bugs as space marines. What do you have to say about this, Natty?

 

Natty: It’s going to be absolutely epic. I’m going to drag you, drag you into the modern age of gaming. No more side scrolling, platforming, eight bitness crappy, crappy games we’re playing. Hell, we’re dropping onto hostile planets and we’re going to be dropping napalm on bugs, flaming them out, rocket launchers, the whole shebang. So look forward to that one.

 

Mark Collett: Look forward to that. Sunday night, 07:00 pm well, look, I just want to thank everyone again. Thank you to Natty, Tollah, and David. Support these guys. I genuinely love all these fellows, and when I got a chance to stream with them all tonight, I was over the moon. I hope you’ve enjoyed it as much as I have. It’s been a very fast moving and informative show. We don’t often do panels like this, but please support all these guys because they all do so much for this cause.

 

And all of them are people that actually want to work together towards some kind of unity to do something positive. You know, these aren’t the back biting people. These aren’t the people in the dark depths of Telegram stirring things up. They’re all powerful content creators working together in the real world for change. Support these guys. I love them all. Thank you so much! Thank you to everyone, Natty, Tollah, David, thank you to all those who generously donated. I couldn’t do this without your continued support. You know, if I didn’t get donations, if I didn’t get people Superchats, I wouldn’t be able to afford to do this. It’s as simple as that.

 

So thank you for keeping this show going for as long as it’s been going. 267 episodes plus 100 episodes of Tutar before it. And thank you most of all to everyone who tunes in on a weekly basis. I’ll see you all again next week, hopefully see you on Sunday when I’ll be playing with Natty. Until then, stay strong. Keep fighting. Good night.

 

The Ayatollah: I love you all.

 

Mark Collett: See you all soon. Thank you. Bye.

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/23/2024 = 916)

Mark Collett
3 days ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

2
4
Hide replies

@Trevor
3 days ago
Labour will be in deep shit within 6 months to a year. If they dare put taxes up ever so slightly the Tory media will lambast them deliberately forgetting that their party are the ones who gave us the highest ever tax burden
The Tory Right are becoming unhinged in terms of who they want to throw under the bus: the sick, the disabled, the unemployed – and for many of the younger Tories, the elderly
I don’t think Labour will be overtly anti-white but they are very likely to crack down on dissidents. I think the panel are right that war is coming and it’s going to be disastrous for a society as atomised, as selfish and as ethnically divided as this one is. We are also grossly over-dependent on food imports

2
0

@Trevor
3 days ago(edited)
Having gone to a private school myself I am completely ambivalent about them paying VAT on the fees. This society is dominated by the privately educated, it’s they who are running it off a cliff and having been educated at such a place, I can tell you that from day one you are encouraged to view the rest of society as being beneath you
David Clews is a bit contradictory on that – he’s talking about the politics of envy on private school fees yet knocking “boomers” for benefitting from higher interest rates. I guarantee bashing boomers will backfire on people – that generation’s property is being eyed up by the asset management firms and it won’t be passed onto their kids.

1
0
Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Be patient with those in our movement. We may not agree on everything but thats ok

7
0
Fancy
3 days ago
THEY need people to sign up willingly. The only way to do that is a false flag so we all think we are the good guys fighting terror. remind you of anything ?

4
0

@What3
3 days ago
best stream ever. high level political analysis, i agree with the clews fella on sunak, sunak is throwing it. zog is getting all their ducks in a row for war with iran/russia and their proxies

3
1
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
the west is not in anyway ready to fight a war against anyone

1
1
danzimmons
3 days ago
Dave & Tollah both are hilarious

2
0

@ИванКожедуб
2 days ago(edited)
All Star Panel! Great show.
Disabling splats was gay though.

@MarkCollett
, or anyone: can you link the photo of Farage with his arm round Thomas-Bowen? I can’t find it, or any reference to it.

1
0

@xero
3 days ago
1:42:59
top notch lmao

1
0
Henry
3 days ago
What is the point of the Lib Dems? I don’t get it.

0
1
Henry
3 days ago
Likud (The House) always wins!

1
0

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN-UP to the PA Newsletter (scroll down):
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/get_involved

0
1
Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Beau and Dan got chipped from Reform… and they’re with The lotus eaters

1
0

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
Good evening everyone.

0
1

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
I’m quite bored by the general election, but this show was actually really interesting. Great stream, great guests.

1
0

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
bugs and terminators.

0
1

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
JOIN the Patriotic Alternative gaming group on Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticGamers

0
1

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

0
1
danzimmons
3 days ago
nothing better than spending the evening on Tgram watching dirt poor sandal clad orphaned Palestinian kid’s yeeting IDF hiding in their billions of dollars armor tanks

1
0
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I called it from the start, Israel will defacto loose this war

2
1

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
Mark Collett on Britain going to war with Germany:

1
0

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Patriotic Alternative official links:
PATV:

Patriotic Alternative Video

Website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk
Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticAlternativeOfficial
Membership:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/join

0
2

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN the petition to FREE SAM MELIA!
https://www.change.org/FreeSamMelia

0
2

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
FREE Mark Collett eBook | The Fall of Western Man:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

0
2

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Mark Collett:
Telegram:
https://t.me/markacollett
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/c/MarkCollett
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/MarkCollett
BitChute:
https://tinyurl.com/ynec2sys
Gab:
https://gab.com/markcollett

0
2
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
^^

0
2

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow SerenaJB:
X:
Tweets by SerenaJB3
Gab:
https://gab.com/SerenaJB

0
2
Chief Moody
3 days ago
I’ll be streaming tomorrow, guys

1
1
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
David Clews has been a great addition I hope he returns

1
1
ScaredyCat
3 days ago
$4.00
HiAgain, Mark,David,Ayatollah & Natty: Sheikh Imran Hosein’s student “Sameer” was born in London, but emigrated 2 Morocco & openly invites Muslims in West on YouTube 2 settle in Morocco, where he will help them establish themselves in their “new” country. Sheikh inPreviousYears did this in Pakistan.

0
2
danzimmons
3 days ago
Nick was great on Periscope, every since getting his first $500K Bitcoin he’s been doing nothing but cucking

1
3
Hide replies
GusinLanzarote Alt Right
1 day ago
I cant understand those who Cuck once they have enough Surely the best thing about having the £$ should be not having to worry about being sacked/ cancelled- Farage is the same

Honkey
3 days ago
hopefully AF wins huge damages $$$$

1
1
Henry
2 days ago
This guy is spreading lies about nick fuentes and ali alexander. You should ban Natty.

2
5
Hide replies
Natty
2 days ago
How is it a lie? Ali Alexander was messaging a 15yr old boy who was part of AF

5
0

@JohnConnor
2 days ago
Are you non White? If the answer is no, get your head out of your behind about spic Fuentes

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Good night Brothers and Sisters

0
2

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Chief Moody:
Odysee:

@Chief_Moody
Telegram:
https://t.me/chiefmoody
Gab:
https://gab.com/Chief_Moody
YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@ChiefMoody

1
2

@Glen19
3 days ago
$2.00
What did you think about the White Nationalist rally in Detroit over the weekend? I saw it on Japanese news media over here. It looked more multiracial than I would expect. However, Jared Taylor & Dr. David Duke was there. Many may hate Fuentes for being a Castizo but looks like he is doing well.

2
5
Hide replies
Henry
3 days ago
This comment was slimed to death. (Click to view)

0
5
ScaredyCat
3 days ago
$4.00
Hi, David,Ayatollah,Natty & Mark: Is itPossible 2 introduce Sheikh Imran Hosein 2 Mark ? I think YourNewspaper interviewed him. RightNow he is inMalaysia, then Indonesia, onto Armenia & Russia, eventually 2 stopover in England on his way home in Trinidad, the Caribbean island. .HeOrganizedEmigration

1
3
Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Phew. Thankfully Mr Clews didn’t have a Freudian moment @
1:24:00
when he said “these stupid stunts” in reference to disruptive attention seeking actions by the likes of Stop Oil

GusinLanzarote Alt Right
1 day ago
Didnt know about the Nonce aspect to Ali Alexander I remember Alex Jones fawning to him because he is Non White Once again Alex picks a winner! Not the greatest judge of strategy or men If he led an Army regiment back in ye Olden days he’d do a Custer & get himself + everyone else wiped out Best not invite him on PWR or the show will be shut down the next day!

Stolen Content
2 days ago
1:16:00
the «rant» may be close to over and I am unaware who the gentleman bottom rigth is, but Mark: you should jews his words.
There is no white and black pill that is coming your way with Farrage..
He is granted his words to prove to the fence-sitting elite that you common people now like 80 years ago felt the same, thus justifying your complete and final remowal

Hide replies
Natty
2 days ago
Interesting take

@filled_soda
2 days ago
Great stream!

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
I appreciate Mark’s succinct comment about WWII being about maintaining the current bankers monopoly on currency. This needs to be repeated until everyone understands.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
the power of one! the power of two! the power of maany

withey
3 days ago
goodnight all

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Great stream 1488 o/

Honkey
3 days ago
great show o/

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
o/ tollah

The Ayatollah
3 days ago

@why
Odysee and Rumble:

@TheAyatollah
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision

Honkey
3 days ago
good to see Clews on the show

@EnglishRose
3 days ago
Thank you, great stream.

danzimmons
3 days ago

@why
3 days ago
I bet spencer had a go on it

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@danzimmons
LMAO

@why
3 days ago
And you have something against the number 3???

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
she has already been on maybe twice

danzimmons
3 days ago
Natty

Natty
3 days ago

@danzimmons
absolute kek

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
yes remigration

@why
3 days ago
Have Syrian Girl on, just so we can simp…

@why
3 days ago
Gen Z aint fighting, theyre more radical than we are

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 days ago
<0.01
based dungarees please Tollah

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Thanks folks. Till next time.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Great show

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Hahahaha the Katie Fanning line

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
Good night good folks. Thanks everyone for attending the stream.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
yes agreed

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
lmao

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@why
Follow The Ayatollah:
Main Telegram:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah
Off-Topic Telegram:
https://t.me/TollahOffTopic
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision
Odysee:

@TheAyatollah

@Joesmith
3 days ago
lol

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
lol

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
Great show tonight.

@why
3 days ago
where is tollah streaming now?

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
That didn’t sound good lol.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Gay announcement ?

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 days ago

@Natty
evening mate

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
amen

@Joesmith
3 days ago
14

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
we’re the most desirable in the world

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow David Clews:
X:
https://x.com/unitynewsnet
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/UnityNews
Website:

home

Telegram:
https://t.me/UnityNewsNetwork
Rumble:
https://tinyurl.com/ms7mnm7d
Facebook:
https://tinyurl.com/mr4ym3f8

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
militarily speaking russia cannot keep it up for more than 2 years from now. they don’t have the demographics for it, they are imploding. 2nd they need to plug 3 more sensitive areas if they are to feel safe as they were in 1952. plus china already took territory from them in the east.

@why
3 days ago
lol

@why
3 days ago
they lost a sperg who cucked

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
have

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
they should

@why
3 days ago
gay

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
bravo

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
‘The drip’s the best part!’

@why
3 days ago
needed the minecraft music

Natty
3 days ago
fanatastic

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
3 days ago
bravo

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
What did they expect? The Palestinians are fighting off extinction.

@cheflad
3 days ago
if you listen to Scott Ritter ,the IDF are taking a beating and are totally demoralised

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Ayatollah:
Main Telegram:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah
Off-Topic Telegram:
https://t.me/TollahOffTopic
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision
Odysee:

@TheAyatollah

Honkey
3 days ago
Cyprus didnt learn its lesson in the Kitos War

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Kinda would like some more attention on American topics also

@why
3 days ago
get george galloway on

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Mark Collett | Interview on Blood Brothers Podcast:

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ScaredyCat
Thanks again for donating.

@why
3 days ago
these are the best interviews mark

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
David the Chad

Honkey
3 days ago
nice dono o/

@AntiMattoid

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
lol

@why
3 days ago
j’s would never cuck, they would just say he was having a bad day because of holohoax anxiety

@Diogenes
3 days ago
y

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
agreed

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AntiMattoid
Thanks for your generous donation!

Anti Mattoid
3 days ago
$59.12
Great show.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Join us at Patriotic Alternative:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/get_involved

@cheflad
3 days ago
ar least we’re not Speaking German

@why
3 days ago
you just need to make it as an MP once and youve made it

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Hahaha

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Katie taking a doing

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
LMAO

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Charles
It’s not looking good.

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
I’m going to have to watch it again.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
The sniffing hahaha

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
<0.01
Nativist Bars

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
PA FILM REVIEW – Dead Man’s Shoes:
https://tinyurl.com/3wyw42md

@Joesmith
3 days ago
i use to hang around mannor house because of some lass

@why
3 days ago
bullying each other

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
Perhaps they are a lost cause and are destined to be useful morons?

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
An autistic 14 year old got nicked a few weeks ago for just possessing those documents, Charlie got extradited from Spain, but this particular guy, nothing. Nothing to see here…

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
LMAO again.

@why
3 days ago
best name on the internet

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Charles
Drinking overpriced food and beer. Plus murderous fees for parking.

@why
3 days ago
embrace the sperg

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
I got free tickets to a NFL game and the amount of normies screaming their idiotic heads off is astounding

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
I never knew him, but that’s irrelevant. As soon as I saw he has not been arrested for doing something that autistic teenagers get nicked for, I knew he was a state asset.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
so true

@why
3 days ago
and we’re all spergs lol

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
I never liked that particular lad. There was always something not right about him.

Chief Moody
3 days ago
Egotism is partly the problem with Nationalism

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
possibly. but the state doesn’t give out free passes on terror offences in exchange for nothing…

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
I’d say that sounds like strategic by the state.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
yes pay your tidings

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
When I became aware of that, I knew they were a fed op without a shadow of a doubt.

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
Indeed.

danzimmons
3 days ago
#David Clews is NOT gay. x10

@cheflad
3 days ago
i get it ,Paul Dempsey is a top footy commentator as well.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
good name

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ScaredyCat
Thanks for your consistent and loyal support.

@hunter
3 days ago
miss tasob

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
Quid pro quo perhaps.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
cancel netflix pay your tidings

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
The country is burning but hey…is the football game on?

@cheflad
3 days ago
go and ask Sam & Laura if its an easy life.

@CrankyCracker2
3 days ago
mexican catboy made his million

@why
3 days ago
Ralph did ok for a while, the gunt.. cant abort the retort

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Fed, gay, jew, or grifter. The classic divisive accusations.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
it is a meager existance

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Isn’t it interesting how Homeland’s second in command got let off sharing the same links as Charlie Big Potatoes?

@why
3 days ago
Clews News…

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I like David Clews

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
FREE Mark Collett eBook | The Fall of Western Man:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
I had to spell it “moil” because Mark would pronounce mohel “mo-hel”

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
LMAO

danzimmons
3 days ago
think about the children just stop moils

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@14Reasons
that is kind of a joke, he meant you shouldn’t let your desires/vices govern you

@why
3 days ago
catboys not gay

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
HAHAHAHA

@why
3 days ago

@Charles
bruh

danzimmons
3 days ago
lol

@why
3 days ago
when even gaped alaska ended up as an informant

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Natty is right

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
PA FILM REVIEW – Dune Part 2:

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Dont think there’s any evidence Nick is gay

@MrRoboto
3 days ago
lol

@why
3 days ago
he also recieved about 1m quid in BTC a few days before jan 6th

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Chief Moody:
Odysee:

@Chief_Moody
Telegram:
https://t.me/chiefmoody
Gab:
https://gab.com/Chief_Moody
YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@ChiefMoody

@hunter
3 days ago
is that true?

@alpha007org
3 days ago
Was that 100% confirmed. Because I heard a slightly different story… But I don’t know

14Reasons
3 days ago
“having sex with women is gay”

@why
3 days ago
nice was there in jan 6th as well and got away scot free

Chief Moody
3 days ago
Fuentes said that women were pedophiles

14Reasons
3 days ago
fuentes is a homosexual. is he not?

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Be good if Nick matured a bit more

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Unfortunately Fuentes rubs a lot of people the wrong way.

@Glen19
3 days ago
we can treat them all universally with contempt

@Glen19
3 days ago
I don’t care if a pedo is brown or not. lol

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I like him

@Diogenes
3 days ago
I like Nick but the virgin queen Chihuahua is a hilarious nickname

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Spencer is camp as a row of tents

danzimmons
3 days ago
Fuentes is gud at getting free publicity, and that’s it

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Keith Woods was there too

@DissidentZelda
3 days ago
Thank you.

@CrankyCracker2
3 days ago
exactly

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Gay pedo rates are insane and yet no one in the mainstream even dares speak of the reality

@why
3 days ago
laura loomer also

danzimmons
3 days ago
is it true that a chic got hi on shrooms & stooped Dr. Duke

The Crucible 01
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
the event was cancelled Thursday and nick didnt say anything until Saturday

@Glen19
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Gays adopt kids so they can abuse them

@why
3 days ago
greg and his “merry men”

@Diogenes
3 days ago
if you say down with Israel no venue in Western World

The Crucible 01
3 days ago
nick fuentes is an obvious grifter

@MarkCollett

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Honkey
I think they will

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@why
Grindr is full of pedos and big surprise…a Israeli Jay created the app

@why
3 days ago
his russia missus has a proper pair of norks

@alpha007org
3 days ago
I heard months/weeks before Trump got elected, there were promises of gov. jobs. But then 180 turn. And Richy got mad. that’s all.

@BillBikes
3 days ago
Gaayyyyyyy!

Honkey
3 days ago
AF isnt “white nationalist”

danzimmons
3 days ago
Ninart Spencer was always a clout chasing fa@@et

@why
3 days ago
RS deffo not gay

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Donate via the PA website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/donations

Natty
3 days ago
yeah guys i know he’s probably not actually gay, but chasing novelty takes for rage bait is pretty gay

Honkey
3 days ago
supporting Biden is just absurd

@Glen19
3 days ago
I hated the COVID nonsense that went on. There is no mass death coming.

@SomaComa
3 days ago
we should try and stand together

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
That speech he gave at Auburn university in 2017 was brilliant too. Shame what happened to him.

@why
3 days ago
grindr greg

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Diogenes
yes

Stan1
3 days ago
thought you were talking about Frank doh

@Diogenes
3 days ago
ask Faith Goldy

@Glen19
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Both are gay?

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@AwarenessOfBeing
Excellent spot on example. Thanks

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
TO be fair, those old NPI propaganda videos were brilliant.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

@why
3 days ago
he’s shagged everything

Honkey
3 days ago
haha

@why
3 days ago
nah hes not

@why
3 days ago
lol

Merry_Englander
3 days ago

@Charles
That’s pretty much what happened with Liberia.

danzimmons
3 days ago
lol kuer starmer the hotdog stormer

@why
3 days ago
He’s probably mi5

@why
3 days ago
he spent 5 years in northern ireland working for the police

@Glen19
3 days ago
They slow it down because of the pushback but then they ramp it up

@hunter
3 days ago
Labour will introduce a race equality act which will sail through parliament with labours huge majority

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Glen19
mhm

@Glen19
3 days ago

@14Reasons
It happened in the past. After the migrant crisis in Europe years ago they slowed it down

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Glen19
impossible to believe it

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Glen19
Interesting video recommended by Keith Woods | How Denmark SOLVED The Immigration Crisis:
https://tinyurl.com/ysratcvb

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Glen19
by what? 5 people?

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
already signed

@Glen19
3 days ago
There is a pattern of left wing parties reducing immigration after right parties increase it

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN the petition to FREE SAM MELIA!
https://www.change.org/FreeSamMelia

14Reasons
3 days ago
lmfao

the woodlander
3 days ago
good for david…

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
I like Farage but he’s not our guy

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Charles
mhm

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@14Reasons
Its pathological delusional thinking

14Reasons
3 days ago

@why
you aren’t one of our guys

@Glen19
3 days ago

@14Reasons
It wasn’t stopped completely but they did slow it down

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Glen19
I don’t believe most of mainstream data

Honkey
3 days ago
because these govts are just theatre for the masses

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
we should put Morgoth in charge.

@IPF89
3 days ago
labour are for open borders so more invaders

@Joesmith
3 days ago
blare was the worst

@why
3 days ago
Farage isnt our guy, but, he’s not motivated by money or blackmail.. He has a vision for the country and he’s single minded and will keep at it.

@Glen19
3 days ago

@14Reasons
Check out the left wing party in Denmark and how much they decreased it

withey
3 days ago
biggest channel crossing numbers yesterday

the woodlander
3 days ago
its a corrupt anti white system. dont take part

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Starmer is like a stepford wife

14Reasons
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
k

@why
3 days ago

@14Reasons
lol, you just outed yourself as a Uketard

@sonof7s
3 days ago
Putin is a Communist OBVIOUSLY!

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@14Reasons
I can’t take credit for that point. Just passing on a superchat from Rumble.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
I voted SDP at the local elections.

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Charles
time after time

the woodlander
3 days ago
sdp are very pro family, which is good.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
If Black Americans were given their own ethnostate I guarantee within 6 months it will fall into utter chaos and Whites will be blamed

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
and entropy doesn’t accept my bank card

14Reasons
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
right with putins multi racial utopia russia

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Someone superchat asking for Nativist bars. I’m out of odysee tokens.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
NATIVIST BARS

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Donation on Rumble:
kevinnormansavage
$5
I wonder if Putin might see his way clear to giving or selling us Ethno nationalists a nice chunk of land where we can thrive and be the best neighbour he ever had

Natty
3 days ago
thats good

Natty
3 days ago
lmao

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
0.01
If Just Stop Oil did a protest at a synagogue they’d have to be renamed Just Stop Moil.

@SomaComa
3 days ago
I think they both like eating cut dick

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
They’re both born blaggers.

14Reasons
3 days ago
yea farage with his place being pro invasion as a worthless traitor

14Reasons
3 days ago

@why
why are you even here

@why
3 days ago
Honestly, if you think farage doesnt give a shit about the UK youve lost the plot.

@cheflad
3 days ago
its like Diane Abbot ,she could race bait anyone until she had a pop at the Tribe ,then the hammer came down on her.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
200+ years of Black American failure wont magically be cured by bringing down confederate statues

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
so true

danzimmons
3 days ago
$1⃣4⃣*⃣8⃣

@SomaComa
3 days ago
wait who’s selling used cars here?

14Reasons
3 days ago

@why
lmfao no

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
hyper consumption. they aren’t designed for it. they’re supposed to be in mud huts.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
If they did it at a synagogue, they’d be called Just Stop Mohel.

@TheAyatollah

@why
3 days ago

@14Reasons
its obvious that he cares about his country

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
Come on lads. Only 6 more likes for the magic 109.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
well said Mark

the woodlander
3 days ago
taking an african and transplanting him in europe increases his consumption of commodities by 80% great for capitalism dire for the environment.

14Reasons
3 days ago
they’ll only attacks the states enemies

danzimmons
3 days ago
they’ll never attack any synagogue

@hunter
3 days ago
just stop oil are no threat to the state. perfect controlled opposition

@why
3 days ago
lol

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
poor horse

@why
3 days ago
Hed be dumb not to

danzimmons
3 days ago
paid actors

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
DEFO. Tollah. Fetch the noose

@why
3 days ago
Has Farage spoke about it?

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Tollah Telegram post regarding violation of Stonehenge:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah/5341

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Just Stop Oil were a state op to bring in increased police powers on protests.

@IPF89
3 days ago
they’re vermin

@cheflad
3 days ago
i Agree wth David Clews ,these groups are being promoted by the media and Establishment.

14Reasons
3 days ago
“bring down White history so brown people can have their turn to power”- pure evil

danzimmons
3 days ago
^

14Reasons
3 days ago

@why
uh huh

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
we must understand that the emotions that rule the left are anxiety and greed. while on the right those emotions are pride and disgust. just wait for people to get there.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
Sure, for now.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
pretty sure destroying White made statues wont bring West Africa to our level like they think

danzimmons
3 days ago
farrage the mirage

14Reasons
3 days ago

@SomaComa
the dildo that isn’t used for the conventional orifice

@why
3 days ago

@14Reasons
lol, i mean you know thats not true

Blankeon
3 days ago
Its good. Make it obvious to everyone that America is under Zionist occupation.

14Reasons
3 days ago

@why
he probably supports it

@SomaComa
3 days ago

@14Reasons
They are the dildo of the state

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
as temporary solution

14Reasons
3 days ago
they are basically the state

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Their logic is bring down White heritage because brown people cant build civilization

@SomaComa
3 days ago
they need to go

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
David is right about starving their oxygen of publicity.

danzimmons
3 days ago
lol

@SomaComa
3 days ago
The pussy hats create a lot of C02

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Stan1:
X:
Tweets by s_stan1
Gab:
https://gab.com/S_Stan1
Odysee:
https://tinyurl.com/4ter3r4y

14Reasons
3 days ago
the government is probably funding these stop oil bastards. because it’s what the establishment wants. destroying european history

danzimmons
3 days ago
all part of war on the west

@SomaComa
3 days ago
it’s not just a rock

withey
3 days ago
about 5000 years

@Joesmith
3 days ago
lol

14Reasons
3 days ago
these just stop oil people are terrorists themselves

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Fetch the noose

@SomaComa
3 days ago
yea someone would get a slap for doing that

@IPF89
3 days ago
just stop oil should be put in the stocks

ItsOkToBeANationalist
3 days ago
He means death to the conservatives in Minecraft

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
the goy are restless

14Reasons
3 days ago
I’d physically intervene. don’t care

Stan1
3 days ago
Always always against European culture & art

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Stonehenge has a fence around it.

@hunter
3 days ago
the government already basically agree with just stop oil.

@cheflad
3 days ago
again ,where does the just stop oil funding come from

@Joesmith
3 days ago
press 1 for gas

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
JOIN NOW! PA Membership Now Open! Only £3 per month.
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/join

@Gundobar
3 days ago
Every.Single,Time

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Kline

@SomaComa
3 days ago
(((Surprise!)))

@why
3 days ago
what happened?

@Joesmith
3 days ago
every single time

Honkey
3 days ago
EST

14Reasons
3 days ago
the real terrorists are propped up by the elite. good white men are lied about. the terrorists project and claim we are the terrorists

danzimmons
3 days ago
White people are already creating parallel societies in murrica

ItsOkToBeANationalist
3 days ago
Milkshake isn’t enough

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
REDS

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Capitol punishment for destruction of a national monument

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Rope and Pole

14Reasons
3 days ago
they’re vandalizing beautiful things. they must be punished

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
It’s pre-historic

@why
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
yeah. They screwing up all over the place

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
hope so

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
this will be a crazy century with the collapses of the USA, russia, china.

@Glen19
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
It shows that it isn’t a lack of funding because foreign States gave funding in the past

@why
3 days ago
Ukraine is their plan b

danzimmons
3 days ago
can’t even contain sandal wearing Houthi’s lol

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
and they can’t trust anyone and they increasing have to rely on Jews and not their usual shabbos

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Reuters | US imposes sanctions on Nordic Resistance Movement in fight against white supremacy:
https://tinyurl.com/msme9drf

@SomaComa
3 days ago
The shitbags have taken control of all pressure points in white countries globally.

danzimmons
3 days ago
wait till Hezbollah is done with israel gonna be was real

@why
3 days ago
the citadel is under attack

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
yes

@why
3 days ago
Theyre stretched

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@SomaComa
it is nice

@why
3 days ago
Natty dead right

@Glen19
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Nationalists in Europe have worked with Arab nationalists in the past prior to 9/11. Hafez Al-Assad & Gaddafi even funded White nationalist organizations.

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@noreplacement
i believe that european states will split. and then the reconquest will begin.

@SomaComa
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
This is the best colour

@why
3 days ago
how much balls would it take to take ZoG’s money and betray them

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
It’ll be proscribed here next.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@SomaComa
the kek colour

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Terrible racist green colour

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@Glen19
and what are we doing about the devshirme system, the mediterranean white slave trade, the destruction of the roman empire, etc. they are anti white. wake up.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I always vote as well

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

@why
3 days ago
cant barage the farage

Honkey
3 days ago
write in for Hitler

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow David Clews:
X:
https://x.com/unitynewsnet
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/UnityNews
Website:

home

Telegram:
https://t.me/UnityNewsNetwork
Rumble:
https://tinyurl.com/ms7mnm7d
Facebook:
https://tinyurl.com/mr4ym3f8

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
yup

@SomaComa
3 days ago
The cool thing is that none of us want to be doing this

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for Clews

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
$5.00
Democracy = Plutocracy

the woodlander
3 days ago
as interesting as these elections are, and it is good to see the public moving slowly our way, im afraid the direction of travel for the UK has already been determined.

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
mark it doesn’t matter. look at ancient rome. they decided to go for 2 parties optimates and populares. they were the exact same thing. until augustus came it was all a complete joke.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
CLEWS totally ruining Mark!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PMSL

@Glen19
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
Germans have went to fight with Palestinians and received training. They have streets named after American & European martyrs. What are you on about?

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
PA FILM REVIEW – Dune Part 2:

Stan1
3 days ago
I’m likely to pass this time, so agree with David. All the candidates are not for me

@noreplacement
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
You are correct, it’s awful to hear them squirm and excuse their traitorous behaviour. I do say to my peers that I care more about their grandchilren than they do, despite being comfortable. I don’t have many friends ha ha. But beware, time isn’t on your side.

@SomaComa
3 days ago
What recourse have you got though when you’re not represented at all?

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Democracy is a scam

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Anarchism

@Glen19
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Being Pro-Palestine should be a Non-sequitur. I have no idea why it is so controversial

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Clews has got the Pooch bug!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@SomaComa
3 days ago
I’m sorry to fed post, but…..

ItsOkToBeANationalist
3 days ago
Reform aren’t standing in my area or I’d vote for them

withey
3 days ago
the only choice i have is SDP so i will vote SDP

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
voting is just offering them legitimacy.

14Reasons
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
allot of us don’t care for them. I think they shouldn’t be slaughtered by jews but that’s it

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
SDP are old-Left. Not bad

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@ADayWithoutYesterday
That was a fake accent he put on for years.

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
I thought Tollah was born and bred London but he’s got a northern accent.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@14Reasons
no we don’t

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Glen19
Thanks for your loyal and consistent support.

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@noreplacement
as I’ve said u sir are a particular case. completely opposite to the others in your generation. but they lived under the highest living standards in human history. it made them soft and fat. also numerically the largest generation in history. so all politics is voted by them.

14Reasons
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
‘far right’ doesn simp for non whites

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Glen The Chinaman on Gab:
https://gab.com/GlenTheChinaman

Blankeon
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
tragic comedy yes

withey
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
it seems SDP are centre left but are against immigration

ItsOkToBeANationalist
3 days ago
British democrats

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@14Reasons
and they still hate us. they would rejoice of the same happened to us.

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
Jeff Taylor UKIP.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
it is not taking the knee , we hve common enemy

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Galloway or Reform

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
Reform.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Reform

Natty
3 days ago
but it has no mass appeal BHP beacuse hes doing it whiles trying to avoid the paradigim of the “far right”

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ItsOkToBeANationalist
Thanks for your generous donation.

ItsOkToBeANationalist
3 days ago
$25.00
If six pointed Starmer + his handlers are smart, they’d reduce immigration by 5% and say to the media – we’ve reduced immagration. Normies will think he is a messiah. Great line up! Great show!

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow SerenaJB:
X:
Tweets by SerenaJB3
Gab:
https://gab.com/SerenaJB

@why
3 days ago
If Farage was anti-zionist, Galloway would possibly team up with Farage in a coalition… not that it will happen.

@SomaComa
3 days ago
it’s all fun until the golem rips their head off.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Ayatollah:
Main Telegram:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah
Off-Topic Telegram:
https://t.me/TollahOffTopic
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision
Odysee:

@TheAyatollah

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
I constantly make this point on X. The ‘woke’ are supporting the capitalist elite.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
money power loves mass migration

14Reasons
3 days ago
the left is severely disturbed

@noreplacement
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
Obviously I hope you are right, but the youngsters I talk to (outside of our sphere) are low energy zombies

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Homa_Tawk
Anytime.

danzimmons
3 days ago
millions of jewish golem’s

@Homa_Tawk
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
Cheers friend!

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Galloway is quite good on immigration, FFS, NAtty

@SomaComa
3 days ago
immigration is a golem

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
greetings

@Homa_Tawk
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
Hey bud!

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
yes

@why
3 days ago
they will never vote tory or labour while they have farage

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@14Reasons
hello brother.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
SCAB LABOUR

@why
3 days ago
red wall is going Reform

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
true

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Need leadership with courage

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Homa Tawk on Telegram:
https://t.me/Bunch_a_hunks

withey
3 days ago

@WelshNationalistJoe
if i cn watch it i will

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@Homa_Tawk
o/

Joe Marsh
3 days ago
We ruined two.of Galloways meetings in South Wales back in the day. He had to be taken out the back door

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
revolutionary politics

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@noreplacement
it is funny to us as well. seeing your grandparents care more about their pensions that the ethnic make up of the country their grandchildren will live in…

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
He seem like a old school leftie (tankie)

@Homa_Tawk
3 days ago
Gentlemen

@SomaComa
3 days ago
yea that’s distasteful

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Had a lot on with work recently, but I didn’t want to miss this one.

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
You can be right on all those things without cosying up to Muslims.

danzimmons
3 days ago
like i said, kommie bastards

withey
3 days ago
we need galloway to split the vote of left and muslim, but i hate galloway

@noreplacement
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
Polite and hate conflict ha ha

@SomaComa
3 days ago
I like Galloway, but he was wrong about south Africa

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
Ay up, Mark,. Long time no see

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
o/

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
o/

Joe Marsh
3 days ago
Im on a stream with the Irish at 9pm on twitter
https://x.com/OffgridIreland/status/1803191281000014320?t=_AGon72qSeyhaUu2pPSqBg&s=19

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Tenner say Galloway wins Dale, We on?

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@noreplacement
u are a particular case. the boomers are the 1st generation in history that decided to live better than their children. u are all very polite and hate conflict. our generations need struggle to flourish.

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Evening young man. Hope you’re well.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
Thanks for your loyal and consistent support.

@why
3 days ago
Som jew attacjked him

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Mark Collett video | Galloway Winning is a Blow for the System:
https://tinyurl.com/2tjs6ktu

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@RoryHerbert
probably

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
$10.00
Excellent show tonight, gents.

@why
3 days ago
Galloway and Farage in UK Parl would be epic

Mark Collett
3 days ago
I think the Muslims will go back to Labour, the rest to Reform, he will be squeezed out.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
SPOT ON, NATTY

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
$1.00
My American wife met Nigel Farage in 2015 at a UKIP conference and asked him who he was supporting for the 2016 US election. Nigel replied ‘Rand Paul’. My wife replied that he should support Donald Trump. He shortly changed his mind and he must have made a fair amount of money on that advice !

Joe Marsh
3 days ago
Galloway hates us

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Coming to something when me and Mark (NatSocs) support Galloway for him bloodying the nose of the System

@why
3 days ago
I think he will lose his seat also

@why
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
he released his manifesto today and he seemed really depressed. He was canvassing in Rochdale last night and tweeted that over 50% of people they spoke to would vote Reform..

@noreplacement
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
Nope, you won’t. We boomers thought we’d change things. You will soon run out of time and be the target of younger people. We need to work together, not look for scapegoats

danzimmons
3 days ago
intil they’re starving

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Zoomer Historian | Do British Veterans Regret Fighting World War 2?
https://tinyurl.com/bdzsdndt

Blankeon
3 days ago
How many times will the normies accept being tricked until they have had enough. That is the real question.

the woodlander
3 days ago

@WelshNationalistJoe
its a sad indictment on our leaders.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@WelshNationalistJoe
Zoomer historian did a great video on that

@noreplacement
3 days ago
I’ve heard from people who have met Farage over the years, that he is more base than his TV persona

danzimmons
3 days ago
^^

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
once the boomers are gone… then u will see an explosion of nationalism like u won’t believe.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Some very good takes, it’s a great panel.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
The “White Silence is violence” mantra is absurd. So being a passive uninvolved White person apparently is violent

Joe Marsh
3 days ago
Read the Unknown Warriors by Nicholas Pringle its full of people who fought in WW2 who say it wasnt worth it

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
$5.00
This should be an extra long show

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
^^^^

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
You’re on good form mate. :clapping_hands:

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
Clews is correct.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
Yeah, that’s what they said once the anaesthetic wore off.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
Ouch! :rofl:

danzimmons
3 days ago
Derrick Day has taste in transportation

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Candace Owens had a interesting take on WW2 recently

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Tollah’s getting cutt off more than a tranny

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
lol, that is very possitive

@noreplacement
3 days ago
Powell was of his time remember. Things were not as bad back then

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Robinson is too busy chasing leaves and sucking jew dick to be of any use.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow No Chance:
https://linktr.ee/NaeChance

withey
3 days ago
hail

@WelshNationalistJoe

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Joe Marsh (Welsh Nationalist):
Odysee:

@WelshNationalistJoe
Telegram:
https://t.me/realwelshnationalist
YouTube:
https://youtube.com/@WelshNationalistJoe

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
typical conservative. he was not revolutionary in his ideas. look at the german ’30s pre-meme drawings. they all came true.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
‘Rhetorical concessions’… Well said.

Joe Marsh
3 days ago
Powell was the Farage of his day

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Mark Collett:
Telegram:
https://t.me/markacollett
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/c/MarkCollett
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/MarkCollett
BitChute:
https://tinyurl.com/ynec2sys
Gab:
https://gab.com/markcollett

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Even leftists are redeemable if they have a +100 i.Q

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@SomaComa
normies literally don’t matter in political terms. they are the biggest eunuchs in political history. the most radical group always wins. so don’t go for quantity. quality is the most important.

Blankeon
3 days ago
Red zionist vs blue zionist. Pick your poison.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
We punch way way way above our weight

@Snow
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
shame

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Powell was a loser

danzimmons
3 days ago
kommie priq

@SomaComa
3 days ago
A normy is a potential fren

danzimmons
3 days ago
i helped the jew destroy White South Africa ~ G Gallaway

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
GALLOWAY is ant-ZOG

@why
3 days ago
I think nationalists are over thinking the Farage thing. He’s just promising the earth for the sake of votes. He’s giving a taster of what people want.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
I agree

@SomaComa
3 days ago
It is happening. You can look in your street and see it.

danzimmons
3 days ago
i saw a comment on George Bagby’s Tgram about Mark, how i knew he was streaming

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
It’s a postitve sign, but don’t trust Farage obviously.

withey
3 days ago
we must demand non-white deportations regardless of criminal or how long they’ve lived here

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
once the living standard really starts going down, just wait for them to actually turn to real nationalists. now they are living without struggle.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Woodlander’s website, The Woodlander Initiative:
https://woodlanderinitiative.co.uk/

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Good point, MARK

@Snow
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Das macht es für uns einfacher, andere zu erreichen.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Remigration

the woodlander
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
i know.. good stuff

@SomaComa
3 days ago
We exist in a ‘first past the post system’

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
Sargon was the first to move and perhaps he dragged Farage along. Farage can’t ignore the younger commentators.

withey
3 days ago
??

withey
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
yeah the cucking with HnH is too much, was that just under tice

@noreplacement
3 days ago
you don’t have to get elected to influence politics

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Join us at Patriotic Alternative:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/get_involved

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
Galloway is suing HnH

@SomaComa
3 days ago
It’s true, it helps us

The Ayatollah
3 days ago
Barry Stanton 4 PM.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@withey
I have heard similar double standards

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Beer Hall Pooch:
Odysee:

@BeerHallPooch
X:
Tweets by BeerPooch

the woodlander
3 days ago
not sure i can advocate voting for a party that uses HnH as a vetting agent.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
agreed

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
indeed. but they are playing a dangerous game, because the people will be extremely mad that they didn’t deliver.

withey
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
i know a homeowner who backs 100% the farmer who killed the gypsy burgler yet can’t back kyle rittenhouse all because of the media

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Farage should never become PM, but he could be useful in destroying the Tories

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
David has a good take on Farage’s role.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
I despise the Royal Family, honestly.

@SomaComa
3 days ago
All of the bollocks and words and no action

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@SomaComa
exactly.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Get Clews on GALLOWAY

@SomaComa
3 days ago
it always feels like ‘pressure valve’

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Trump must loose

Blankeon
3 days ago
Pseudo-Nationalism

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Clews gets it

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Most of the Jewish billionaires support Trump

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@withey
the older generations.

withey
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
the people follow the media

Horse Consoler
3 days ago
pothole nationalism, simple as

withey
3 days ago
farage must rule before he can be dismissed

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
certainly

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@withey
of course he talked like a puppet. if he was an actual nationalist he would go on the attack. never allow them to dictate the course of the discussion.

Echo_Harp
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
I know. And they live in Switzerland.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@TheAyatollah
more experienced, then

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Bjorn Hocke would be a much better leader of the AfD.

withey
3 days ago
for reform to go it must first fail

withey
3 days ago
farage hasn’t got to power yet

The Ayatollah
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Mordaunt is in her 50s.

Blankeon
3 days ago
Farage is just like Meloni and Trump. They sound good, but they dont deliver on anything and they are Zionists.

withey
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
so msm vultures are baying for blood, you must appear as a fellow vulture not a carcass

Echo_Harp
3 days ago

@mikefromcleburne
:hundred_points:

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
CLEWS GETS IT

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@mikefromcleburne
a lot of truth there

LoveLoad
3 days ago
the system is designed to give you hope and screw you in the end

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN-UP to the PA Newsletter (scroll down):
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/get_involved

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
what is good with this whole situation is that farage was pushed into talking about our talking points. and of course he is the zionists property.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Ironically lefties think they are against the system but they are actually fighting for the regime and dont even realize it

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp
agreed

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Brexit in name only

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Germans supported the great one because he was undeniably correct.

withey
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
true he’s no patriot but he just might be racist

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
14

Echo_Harp
3 days ago
The AfD voted against a petition calling for an end to arms exports to Israel. They are probably just a controlled bunch too. Too bad there are a few good ones in the party. But the top is conformist.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14

Horse Consoler
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
he wasn’t a banker, common misconception

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for more revolutionary shows like this

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@withey
u actually answered that with a question?

the woodlander
3 days ago

@withey
hes a man of the system, exbanker, he may have some right wing ideas, but ultimately he will buckle to what is best for the system itself

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
S. M. Lipset, who argues that electoral support for Hitler was essentially a middle-class phenomenon

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
No agreement yet exists among social scientists as to sources of naziism’s sudden electoral surge in 1930 and 1932. One widely held view, stressing the importance of the “outcast and apathetic,” has been sharply challenged by S. M. Lipset, who argues that electoral support for Hitler was essentially

withey
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
what would you say to msm?

@SomaComa
3 days ago

@withey
Farage feels more legit than most, even though he’s political and shits on people.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Get to :hundred_points: LIKES! HIT THE :fire: :fire: :fire:

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@withey
farage who said that his greatest political achievement was stopping actual nationalists? does that sound legit to u??

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Im getting off track. I just thought that is some scary stuff

withey
3 days ago
they say farage is further fight than what we think he is

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Agreed

withey
3 days ago
i believe farage is legit

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Farage is constrained, but like Trump, it’s better than the leftist rocket ride to doom.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
The lack of privacy is extremely concerning

withey
3 days ago
can’t believe the banana milkshake, they say different woman, they say she’s a labourite

@cheflad
3 days ago
looks like hes on course to win Clacton by some margin,so he’ll be in the HOC.

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
farage is the very definition of controlled opposition. without revolution their manifesto cannot be implemented. he will tell u what u want to hear and they will do nothing at all.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Through genetic genealogy

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
I read that every single White American can now be identified through DNA. One could sip a coffee and the feds get it and can know extremely personal information now

Horse Consoler
3 days ago
everything isn’t 8D chess mate

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@TheAyatollah
Mordaunt has a good rack

LadyOfMercia
3 days ago
it was a diff girl

Horse Consoler
3 days ago
it wasn’t the same girl

@MarkCollett

Blankeon
3 days ago
Equity is just rebranded Communism

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
indeed in name only. it was financed by actual german elite and former nobility.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
NEW: Mark Collett video | Farage’s Plan to KILL the Conservative Party:
https://tinyurl.com/bdzxu79e

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
I was looking to buy property in Virginia and the taxes are just insane. Cant I just live in peace without the system constantly trying to control me

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
we must understand that the more tyrannical they become, the closer that system is to complete collapse.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
The problem in Britain is the elites have played the classes off against each other for generations.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
They have gone mad with power and the people must push back

Echo_Harp
3 days ago
You might think that they think the state is God and its politicians are the angels.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
in Germany the disaffected middle class a very important role

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
I have to disagree with that. revolution is always fought between two elite groups. workers, farmers, peasants are simply drafted against their will. except for a couple of cases in china there are no workers revolutions.

@noreplacement
3 days ago
No offence taken

@SomaComa
3 days ago
The talk is for proletariat equality, meanwhile the fatcats eat in a way that makes capitalists blush.

@Joesmith
3 days ago
gust got ere 14

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Eddy
Thanks for your support.

@Eddy
3 days ago
$16.00
Thanks for the stream great lineup

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Blair is a Fabian society socialist

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
agreed

Stan1
3 days ago
‘Activate the Farage’!!!!

Blankeon
3 days ago
Blaming Islam does not really solve anything though since Islam is not the problem. The problem is non-Whites in general.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Activate protocol Farage!

@cheflad
3 days ago
the man who bragged about taking down the BNP.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
It was called the National SOCIALIST German WORKERS Party for a reason, buddy

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
My opinion is that parents that send their children to private schools should receive a tax rebate equvalent to the cost of public school education.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Revolution always comes from the WORKERS

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
this will upset the Boomers

@SomaComa
3 days ago
With fatcat Oligarchs that creep in

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Government always wants their cut of our hardworking money

withey
3 days ago
homeschool

@SomaComa
3 days ago
It’s pure (((Communism)))

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Remove your kids from school

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
$14.00
very intersting

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
im speaking in terms of the military

withey
3 days ago
a prison cell for a few good years or killed within 30 mins of being on the battlefield

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Me and Natty are ex-military: NO WAY will we fight again

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
true

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
How the heck could we ever respect a government that’s actively working on erasing us. Patriotism is dead

@cheflad
3 days ago
but surely they know the ultimate outcome is mutual destruction..

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
SPOT ON, NATTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
But you need a tory style party for that , labour can’t do that

@SomaComa
3 days ago
WW3 3rd time lucky

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
damn

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Da,n, this is SPICY!

RedPillFrog
3 days ago
Enjoy the next month or two before the next dancing Jew boogaloo

RedPillFrog
3 days ago
False flag will probably happen towards the end of Summer right as people are heading back to school and work

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
No White American should ever even consider fighting for a country that has shown no loyalty whatsoever to them

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN the petition to FREE SAM MELIA!
https://www.change.org/FreeSamMelia

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Iran DID NOT lock up Sam

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
That’s why we need to question EVERY attack.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
They’re more than happy to drive our countries into oblivion for profit and Israel.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
a shooting wouldn’t be enough

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Jet fuel can’t melt through passports.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Get to :hundred_points: LIKES! HIT THE :fire: :fire: :fire:

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Look at this utter mess we are left with

@PaganBear
3 days ago
They want to kill off white in a war and leave our kids/women with the brown people.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
They have the audacity to call multiracial society a strength. It’s clear increasingly everyday that the exact opposite is the truth.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
ACE point, Tollah

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
lmao

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

Stan1
3 days ago
57

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
If the reform party can destroy the tories , I think it is a good outcome for this election

The Awakened Saxon
3 days ago
‘James Baker, former US Secretary of State ‘We painted Hitler as a monster. The devil incarnate. Thus, we were forced after the war, to play along with this devil’s scenario. We could not possibly have explained to the people that the war was only an economic preventative measure.’

@PaganBear
3 days ago
If we are stupid enough to fight for them we deserve to die as a race.

pa
3 days ago
i aint fighting for starmer of sunak

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
We’re the Fash Street Kids

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
they can’t fight wars anymore.

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
Special Needs Platoon.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Bash street kids, lol

@IPF89
3 days ago
fat cnuts

Stan1
3 days ago
LOL

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I think the days of the regime are numbered

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
ACE revolutionary Nationalist politics

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
White men back in British Army ads…..must be time for another ziowar

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Ayatollah:
Main Telegram:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah
Off-Topic Telegram:
https://t.me/TollahOffTopic
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision
Odysee:

@TheAyatollah

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp
Anyone who argues otherwise is either in denial or flat out unintelligent

@cheflad
3 days ago
Le Pen said yesterday that long range missiles shouldn’t be provided to Ukraine.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
CLEWS GETS IT

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago

@Charles
Indeed

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Labour is not a war party

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Ace point, Clews

withey
3 days ago
no marching it’ll be ‘enemy at the gates’ scenario

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp
Multiracial society for the most part leads to massive suffering

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow David Clews:
X:
https://x.com/unitynewsnet
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/UnityNews
Website:

home

Telegram:
https://t.me/UnityNewsNetwork
Rumble:
https://tinyurl.com/ms7mnm7d
Facebook:
https://tinyurl.com/mr4ym3f8

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
let alone a forced march in full military gear.

@cheflad
3 days ago
only one difference these days ,Russia have got Hypersonic missiles.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp
so true

withey
3 days ago
also the london riots type won’t leave the inner city estates

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Diversity and Unity are literal opposites. Pick one.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@RoryHerbert
toolmakers are the backbone of heavy industry

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Axis of evil is a term Bush coined.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
National + Socialism = ideal

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
It’s going to be a wild ride, that’s for sure.

withey
3 days ago
can’t be unified with muslims

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
Fair point. Galloway’s 10-points is also revolutionary

@cheflad
3 days ago
as Sam Fender sang ,”high time for Hypersonic missiles ”

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
Some of my ancestors were toolmakers in Sheffield using the best steel in the world at the time.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@TheAyatollah
When Nativist tries to chat up Tory birds. “Scuse me love, give me one night and in 9 months and I’ll have you in Labour.”

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
Net Zero Immigration. 10,000 engineers leave, 10,000 illiterate unskilled Afghans arrive.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Is it’s conscription, RIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

the woodlander
3 days ago
reforms manifesto is pretty good, but nearly none of it wiould be possible to implement without a revolution, its just telling you what you want to hear, with no intention of doing it.

@alpha007org
3 days ago
Reform Manifesto read like Twitter right wing talking points.

withey
3 days ago
no one matched blair, but now it’s a whole different world

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Please consider a small donation of $3, $5, or $10. When everyone donates $3, $5, or $10 it adds up!
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
ACE CHAT. Revolutionary politics

@cheflad
3 days ago
things can only get apocalyptic.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Toolmaker is an honorable profession

withey
3 days ago
blair was young, strong and a gogetter

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
He made one specifically big tool…

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Typical middle-class cnt

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
Labour’s placards around my way have the Union Jack on them.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
Good to you as well

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
It’s all words from Starmer

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
Good evening brother.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Hello Folks

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
or Fool Brittania?

@cheflad
3 days ago
the Faux Gatekeepers, Shills and Controlled opposition like Farage are going to fill the Void ,just when we need a Grassroots funded Right-wing party.

Stan1
3 days ago
Starmer looks like a rabbit caught in the headlights of a juggernaut.

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BritishGammon
agreed! That is what a friend of mine says

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
as in france, once u fail to pass a budget a revolution will follow.

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
Labour are quite capable of tearing themselves apart once the honeymoon period is over.

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
I agree with Tollah’s take.

The Ayatollah
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
I might struggle to get it in. Unlike with actual dots.

@cheflad
3 days ago
the Labour Party arent even going to abolish the Bedroom Tax ,which 75% are disabled who pay that punitive Tax.

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
see, do as I say, happiness follows!

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Back on my feet, mate. Even working 6-9pm. Happy now

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Purchase Grandma Towler’s tea, coffee, and honey:
https://www.grandmatowlers.co.uk/shop/
NEW: The official Free Sam Melia Mug:

Free Sam Melia Mug

withey
3 days ago
green green green propaganda, muslim independents, lib dem clowning, non-white led tories, labour no passion no drive reform is energetic ……..it’s all up in the air

Natty
3 days ago
its hard to say who is worse

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
You laughed when I said that

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Galloway says Labour are worse than Tory

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
14

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Tay-sob

withey
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for WOODY

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
evening

withey
3 days ago
do we think the greens will take from liblabcon?

the woodlander
3 days ago

@RoryHerbert
hi rory

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
Good evening

@Woodlader.4
my friend.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Woodlander:
Website:
https://woodlanderinitiative.co.uk/
Telegram:
https://t.me/the_woodlander
YouTube:
https://tinyurl.com/367pzrj4
Odysee:

@Woodlader.4

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Evening

@The
woodlander

withey
3 days ago
hail

@Woodlader.4

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Galloway will win. A tenner says so.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
14

Better Based Than Erased
3 days ago
Yes that was a disgrace.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Stan1
Thanks for your loyal and consistent support.

@cheflad
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14

)))Joker(((
3 days ago
GROUNS

Stan1
3 days ago
$14.00
Great show & guests. As my Grandad once said. ‘Embrace the struggle, enjoy the decline’.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
14

@cheflad
3 days ago
1 Little Indian

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
14

the woodlander
3 days ago
gents

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
Apparently Farage is the most handsome political candidate according to a recent poll !

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
It sickens me how the public will go back to voting labour despite both parties crapping on us for decades.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN the petition to FREE SAM MELIA!
https://www.change.org/FreeSamMelia

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@TheAyatollah
how long before you tell your “connect the dots” joke?

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
One Reform say “Blood and Soil! I will vote for them

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Steve Laws missed a shot by not campaigning under the slogan “Laying down the Law”

Honkey
3 days ago
good to see Clews welcomed onto these shows

Stan1
3 days ago
Pretty sure Boris said something similar in 2019

The Ayatollah
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
More dots than a pallet of dice.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
The Sunak family has more dots than a website url.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Labour will not have an easy ride. Clews is right

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Sunak is trying to curry f(l)avour with the Israel lobby. It’s a sari state of affairs.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
The Scots won’t vote for a brown man

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
A hung Parliament is our best bet. Let’s tie the System up in knots. Fk it. Disorder is now our friend.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

The Ayatollah
3 days ago
San(skrit) Diego.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Sunak wants to skip off to the states with his family.

Stan1
3 days ago

@BritishGammon
you won, here’s your shekel – lol

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow British Gammon:
Odysee:

@BritishGammon
Gab:
https://gab.com/BritishGammon

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
I predict a victory for ZOG

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
ha ha David!

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Victory for the “Friends of Israel” lobbies.

)))Joker(((
3 days ago
awwwwr nawwwwwr

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Hahaha, well played David.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
LULZ

The Ayatollah
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Go ‘ead lad.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Soz, mate, Busy. 2 jobs now. Hope that cheers you up.

@MarkCollett

withey
3 days ago
vote reform vote SDP

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
650

@why
3 days ago
reform 40+ seats

withey
3 days ago
fear of labour, fear of the tories, both as bad as each other

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
sent weeks ago

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
I would advise everyone to vote Reform purely to help break up the Tories.

withey
3 days ago
hail

@TheAyatollah

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
The card? I’ve been busy. 2 jobs now. I’ll let you know

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Chief Moody:
Odysee:

@Chief_Moody
Telegram:
https://t.me/chiefmoody
Gab:
https://gab.com/Chief_Moody
YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@ChiefMoody

@why
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
saw that about Dowson

withey
3 days ago
hail

@Chief_Moody

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Wonder what Nick Griffin will think of Galloway suing HNH, given that he supports Galloway, and his employer Jim Dowson works for HNH.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Heil

@TheAyatollah

withey
3 days ago
SDP is in a pact with reform, i’ll vote SDP

The Ayatollah
3 days ago
Evening all.

Chief Moody
3 days ago
Evening troops

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
YOU HAVE BEEN SENT IT, did it arrive?

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp

@RoryHerbert
Thanks for your ongoing support.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Clews is munching

@why
3 days ago
galloway might lose his seat, he said rochdale was 50% reform

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Galloway tuns on Hope not State!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Stan1
3 days ago
We are approaching some fun times I think – 14’s for all Nationalists.

@BlackwaterPark
3 days ago
Zero Seats?

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow David Clews:
X:
https://x.com/unitynewsnet
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/UnityNews
Website:

home

Telegram:
https://t.me/UnityNewsNetwork
Rumble:
https://tinyurl.com/ms7mnm7d
Facebook:
https://tinyurl.com/mr4ym3f8

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
$14.88
Great line up!

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
$5.00
Just a thought

@MarkCollett
. I would appreciate your comments on ‘Just Stop Oil’s spraying orange paint on Stonehenge earlier today. I have a lot of respect for the woman who intervened. What is the panel’s opinion?

@noreplacement
3 days ago
14

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
0.05
Don’t forget, Tollah is also a rapper.

@noreplacement
3 days ago
This line up has the makings of a great cabinet when we win the election

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for Clews. He’s come a long way

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Let’s goooooo hello lads

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Ayatollah:
Main Telegram:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah
Off-Topic Telegram:
https://t.me/TollahOffTopic
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision
Odysee:

@TheAyatollah

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
get MARRIED!

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Don’t forget a rapper

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
JOIN the Patriotic Alternative gaming group on Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticGamers

)))Joker(((
3 days ago
o/

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
np

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Thanks for the info.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
FREE Mark Collett eBook | The Fall of Western Man:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/
Email Mark Collett: mark@thefallofwesternman.com

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Serious A-Team. Clews is a top boy

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
To donate to Mark Collett via Bitcoin Lightning (click DONATE):
https://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

withey
3 days ago
good evening all, 14/88 28

@BlackwaterPark
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Oh man, that’s awful.

Stan1
3 days ago
David, Tollah, Mark, Natty – ‘the A Team’

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
This stream is also available on:
Rumble:
https://tinyurl.com/3p8t6k5m
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/MarkCollett

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
14

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Mark Collett:
Telegram:
https://t.me/markacollett
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/c/MarkCollett
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/MarkCollett
BitChute:
https://tinyurl.com/ynec2sys
Gab:
https://gab.com/markcollett

Speak your mind
3 days ago
14

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
88

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
14

Stan1
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for Azzmador. So long, mate. Sad news.

The Krypto Report’s Azzmador Has Passed Away at 57

@SerenaJB
3 days ago

@BaritoneHarmonica
Hello CB, thank you :grinning:

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
Good evening everyone.

@SerenaJB
3 days ago

@Stan1
Hello Stan!

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
o/

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Stan1:
X:
Tweets by s_stan1
Gab:
https://gab.com/S_Stan1
Odysee:
https://tinyurl.com/4ter3r4y

Stan1
3 days ago

@SerenaJB
o/

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@SerenaJB
Anytime.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Oh hello

@SerenaJB
I’m a big fan

@SerenaJB
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
Thanks Reed! :thumbs_up:

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow SerenaJB:
X:
Tweets by SerenaJB3
Gab:
https://gab.com/SerenaJB

@EnglishRose
3 days ago
Hello

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Sheeeeeeeiiiiiiiittt

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
Good evening.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
What up

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Please LIKE and SHARE the stream!

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Next pabtomime is the election. HAIL GALLOWAY!

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Lulz

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
I haven’t seen any of the sportsball… Have the Germans been singing Auslander Raus?

Natty
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
hahahahaha true that

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Get what?

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Anyone watching the Euro pantomime with Africa (France)? Romainai beat Ukraine 3-0 so they will get U.S. sanctions

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
did you get it?

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
This is just going to be Tollah on his own impersonating the rest of them.

@SouthernAsshole
3 days ago
LFG.. failed mobile gamer vibes..

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Hopefullly some Nativist Bars during the interval.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Tasty chat tonight. Tollah’s my bro. I know his views

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Please LIKE and SHARE the stream!

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Reed

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Super-mod Redd

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AwarenessOfBeing
Thanks for your dedicated support.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Beer Hall Pooch:
Odysee:

@BeerHallPooch
X:
Tweets by BeerPooch

Merry_Englander
3 days ago
$5.00
Greetings all.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Tremendous line-up. Clews has come a long way. Top boy. Hopefully we will have some revolutionary Nationalist chat instead of the usual bitching about news of the day. Stop piss-arsing about with elections and the old failed ways. Move on.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@dsallen7
Thanks for your loyal and consistent support.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
The Fairchild A-10 Thunderbolt II has a single 30-milimetre Gatling cannon, and two General Electric turbines. When it fires its gun and puts its engines to full, it will actually accelerate backwards. That is how powerful it is.

@dsallen7
3 days ago
$10.00
Conservatives Delenda Est!

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Please LIKE and SHARE the stream!

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@SomeRandomBloke
Thanks for your consistent and ongoing support.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@JLPhillips
Thanks for your contribution.

JakesChannel
3 days ago
$5.00
What a fantastic line up, cannot wait to watch. Thanks for putting on a great show Mark.

Honkey
3 days ago
i like the thumbs down button too, then we can see how many nosebergs showed up

Open Borders for Israel
3 days ago
$5.00
did you see the US government designated the Nordic Resistance Movement as a terrorist group?

@chris
3 days ago
Why is there no thunbs down buttom any more. hum…

Honkey
4 days ago
Great Lineup :thumbs_up:

@ReedJohnson
4 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
4 days ago
SIGN the petition to FREE SAM MELIA!
https://www.change.org/FreeSamMelia

@ReedJohnson
4 days ago
Please LIKE and SHARE the stream!

@ReedJohnson
4 days ago
Patriotic Alternative official links:
PATV:

Patriotic Alternative Video

Website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk
Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticAlternativeOfficial
Membership:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/join

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

Mark Collett: Good evening everybody and hello and welcome to tonight’s book club. And tonight we are here live on Odyssey, live on DLive, and live on Radio Albion.com. And we are reviewing The Camp of the Saints.

 

Now this is a very, very famous book. And it’s, it’s not just famous because of its content, but it’s famous because of the people who read it, the people who were influenced by it. One of whom was Trump’s original strategist in the 2016 campaign, Steve Bannon. It’s one of these books as many have helped inform his opinions.

 

Now, as I said, we are live on Odyssey, DLive and Radio Albion.com. And tonight’s going to be an interesting stream. Hopefully people will have read the book. And remember, if you haven’t read the book, you can get it for free. It’s very, very expensive if you’re looking for a physical copy in English.

 

But there is a PDF copy and a full audio book up on my Telegram channel so basically you can get them from there. I know not everyone likes reading a PDF off a screen, but certainly I can’t see any problem with anybody reading the listening to the audiobook.

 

So if you have enjoyed this book and if you want to contribute to the stream in some way, you can do. And you can contribute to the stream by sending donations or questions either through Entropy, through Odyssey. Well, there are the only two ways. Any paid donation is gratefully received and will read out the comments live on air.

 

And if you write non-paid questions through Entropy, we will also deal with those if we’ve got time. And as this is the book club, it’s one of our smallest streams, it’s not one of the biggest streams we do, there usually is time for some of those.

 

So please let me know your thoughts as well, and we’ll take your feedback.

 

Now, as I said, this book is one of those very famous books. It’s one of those books that liberals really, really hate. And I actually found this a particularly interesting book for several reasons.

 

And one of those was because I’m actually a big fan of sort of monster or horror films. And I actually found that this book was structured a little like a monster or horror film, because most of the book is about this impending doom! It’s about this flotilla or fleet of beat up old vessels bringing migrants to France. And it’s about the way the nation reacts to that impending horror, and about how a nation decides to either defend their borders or to let in a large group of people.

 

Now this book was written in 1973. So many people would think it was quite prophetic. And some of the things in the book are some of them might be a little off, however, and we’re going to discuss all of that tonight.

 

Sadly, the author of this book is not on the show because he’s actually passed away, so he couldn’t be here even if he wanted to. So if anyone’s wondering why we haven’t got the author, we usually have the author, but obviously that would not be possible in this case.

 

Now, I did say there isn’t an English translation readily available for purchase, but that is something that Claymore Books is working on.

 

So if you are a fan of this book, please, please do either wait for that or get the audio or PDF copies free from my Telegram.

 

Now, we’ll start by going around the group. And we will begin with Natty. Natty, how are you doing, my friend? Did you have a good Christmas? Obviously we didn’t do a book club last month. Did you enjoy this book? What were your thoughts about this book and did you enjoy it?

 

[03:58]

 

Natty: Hi, guys. Yes, thank you, Mark. I had a wonderful Christmas. Very nice, cozy, family orientated Christmas. I’ve also just got back from a week on holiday as well, which let me listen to this book.

 

Going back to what you said quickly, before I give my thoughts on the book, I did actually look for a hard copy and I thought I’d brought a hard copy for about £17 off Amazon. Little did I know when it turned up it was the French language copy, which is relatively cheap and easy to buy.

 

However, like you said, the English copy, if you want to buy it, the only copies I could find were somewhere between 160 and £240. So any of our publishers who are going to publish this book I think is going to be worthwhile.

 

However, the copy I listened to, and I think the one you posted, is one Alex Linder from Vanguard Audio and it’s very well read and he interjects with fairly decent notes. He’s one of our guys. He understands the politics, as I think most of us do.

 

However, I think is something Sally is going to allude to, he does get some of the French words butchered to pieces, I guess, because he’s an American. So it makes for an interesting listen. But it is very well read by him and he does put the correct emphasis where it should be. He talks about if he has to make notes about it, he will. So it’s a very good audio book. If anyone wants to read it, I’m sure I’ll post a link at the end or I’m sure you’re going to post it.

 

As to the substance of the book. There’s a lot to like, and I think there’s a few glaring omissions which I’m sure we’re going to cover. I actually read this book three or four years ago and it was part of my red-pill journey, if you like.

 

But reading it again, it’s quite interesting the way you say it kind of reads as like a monster movie. You’re right. Kind of like a Sci-Fi book from the time, like a Robert Heinlein almost with this fleet that Jean Raspail, he kind of takes away the humanity of the fleet, if that makes sense. And these 800,000 Indians just become this one amorphous like blob in the book, of this evil intent that’s coming to the West to destroy it.

 

So it’s quite interesting. And the reactions of the people who are supposed to be in charge, and and how prescient it was, considering it was written in the 70s. As I was reading it you have to keep reminding yourself that this isn’t a book that was written two or three years ago when the migrant boats were crossing not just the English Channel, but the Mediterranean as well. But actually way before any of that happened, before the fall of Libya, and the killing of Gaddafi, which spurred that on. Raspail apparently had a vision of this happening and put it into this book almost 40 years ago, 45 years ago now.

 

So it’s crazy. It’s crazy that this book predicted so much and gets so much right. But like I said, there is one especially glaring emission, but I’m sure we’ll get to that.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, you keep saying that you see, I thought the glaring error was that fundamentally it has the people coming from India. He foresees this giant mass of people moving from the Indian subcontinent.

 

Whereas I think anyone writing this book today would have basically said it was a mix of people probably from the Middle East and Africa, flowing through North Africa, and they would be coming over sort of on a flotilla of sort of endless stream of small boats. That was, to me, the only thing that he seemed to really miss the mark on. But obviously he was predicting this at a different time. Anyway, we’ll get into that later.

 

And I do want to structure this one a bit more because I want to analyze sort of him as a prophetic character. I want to analyze the book in terms of its sort of power and whether people enjoyed it, but also the fact that I do find it to be written in a very, … Usually books are written as there’s a giant happening taking place. And that might be a world-wide happening, a nationwide or sometimes even sort of a galaxy spanning happening. But the story seems to zero in on individuals that do great things and change the course of that sort of nation, world, or galaxy spanning event like Star Wars. It centres in on Luke Skywalker, Han Solo, princess Leia and it tells their story.

 

Whereas I felt this always felt quite backed away. It didn’t deal with these micro plots and human side of things. It dealt with major national changes from a distance, which I found a very, very interesting way to write a book. But we can discuss that later.

 

Anyway, let’s move on to Aunt Sally. How are you doing Aunt Sally? Did you have a good Christmas. And what were your initial impressions of the book? Did you like it?

 

[09:48]

 

Aunt Sally: Hi, Mark. Hi, everybody. Yes, I did have a good Christmas. As far as the book goes, no, I hate it! I brutally hated it! I thought I’d waste hours of my life listening to it. It’s the first audio book I’ve ever listened to. So that was very much a different thing for me because I’m used to reading things, and when I don’t understand, I can turn back a few pages and go back and recap on what I’ve just read and make sense of it.

 

But with the audio, if I press rewind, it took me back to the beginning. It just didn’t didn’t work for me. So I didn’t like the audio. I didn’t really like the book at all. Sorry. Horrible! I wasted my life. 10 hours or something. [Natty chuckling] I tell you how bad it was for me, but quite often I listen to it in the bath and where it’s been cold. I get in the bath for about an hour. It’s the warmest place in the house. And I fell asleep virtually every time I was listening to it. And then I had to listen to it again in case I missed anything.

 

And what you said you liked the way it was structured. I hated the way it was structured! It was all over the place! It starts at the end, really, and it jumps. What you said about a horror film, because to me, that’s what I’ve written in my notes. It’s almost like a storyboard, like he expected it to be made into a movie or something. Or maybe he hoped that, I don’t know. But no, it’s been torture! Hated it. Horrible book. Horrible! Maybe it’s because I’m a woman and I’m playing girl card. It’s horrible.

 

Mark Collett: Do you think it was a bit dystopian Sci-Fi for you, Sally?

 

Aunt Sally: I like sci-fi. All my favourite movies are Sci-Fi. So no, it’s just trying to work out where the story is. 1 minute it’s in a press office, and another minute it’s on the ship. Each little batch of chapters that I listened to, I’m trying to work out where they are. It just didn’t grab me at all!

 

Mark Collett: Natty, if it didn’t grab Sally, what made it grab you?

 

Natty: Well, even as I was reading it, I thought Sally was going to hate it, but for other reasons. Although, Sally, you did say in our private chat that it was kind of very blokey, very male orientated. And I do understand what you’re saying, but as Mark said, it takes this great big event, this world changing event, and it tries to, I don’t know, have this snapshot of the I don’t know. It happens over the course of about a month or two months, and then it especially Zooms in on the last two or three days where the fleet actually arrives was Off the coast of southern France.

 

The focusing, the chopping and changing and going between different characters. And I think probably there’s five or six areas or characters and geographical locations. There’s a couple in Paris who are also towards the end, there’s an Arabic kind of crime lord, or community leader.

 

There’s the press stuff, which is quite interesting because you’ve got this old dinosaur Right-wing press guy or Right-wing in quotation marks who has almost zero circulation, whereas the direction of travel for every other press and newspaper and radio personality is very liberal, very progressive, very anti-racist. And this guy is kind of struggling against the tide.

 

You’ve got the old man on the coast. So what’s this, three plot-lines so far? The old man on the coast, who has a house in Provence, who watches his fleet, arrives and knows that his house and his village is just going to get destroyed by these people.

 

And then towards the end, there’s also the colonel of the army and the glorious last stand, which definitely is very male orientated.

 

I think Jean Raspail in his notes said that he didn’t want to let the West win at the end. He wanted it to be the disaster that he wrote about and he wanted it to, I don’t know, as a kind of shock as to make us think this could happen, the way everything structured, the way our leaders are, the way the Churches, this could absolutely happen.

 

And he wanted to deny victory for the old kind of knightly or elite ways of the West, which would have saved us. So instead he gave these six or seven men a glorious last stand. And I think they end up getting bombed by French fighter jets at the end and dying. Which is, maybe that’s a male fantasy of these guys who cling cling fast to their ideals right to the end in the face of this new, diverse, anti-racist Europe which swallows up everything.

 

And it’s not just France, it’s the rest of the world too.

 

However, coming back, the reason I thought you’d hate it is because the way I read it, it seemed to be attacking the Church pretty heavily. And I know that’s one of the things that you’re not a fan of so I don’t know what Jean Raspail thought about that. But as I was reading it, this is something that’s Sally was really, really going to hate. Yeah, sorry, go on, go on, Sally.

 

[15:49]

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, as far as the Church goes, I would attack the Church as. Well, I mean, I’m no fan of the Church. Just because I’m a Christian doesn’t mean that I’m a fan of the Church. The church, all the Churches are apostate religions as far as I’m concerned. I’m a Christian, I’m a born again believer. So the Church is the last, … You wouldn’t get anyone further from I mean, I think what I was yeah, …

 

Natty: What I meant to say was it poured scorn on the Church and Christianity whilst ignoring [chuckling] another religion, which is why I thought maybe you wouldn’t like it. Or you would have seen through that and been pretty disappointed, or hated the book for that reason. Or hated the content of a book for that reason.

 

Aunt Sally: It’s funny because you’re right, he doesn’t mention the other religion. One presupposes reading it that the people, these Ganges, he calls them the Ganges refugees, that they’re all Hindu. I don’t know why I thought that, but that’s the only religion that I saw mentioned briefly. The other one wasn’t mentioned at all, was it?

 

Natty: No, not at all. I got that in my notes, but I’ll throw it back to Mark.

 

Mark Collett: He certainly didn’t mention a specific (((ethnic group))) that seems to be very intent on opening borders for others, whilst keeping their own borders closed, if that’s what you’re talking about. And I think that’s because of the very, very strict laws in France about mentioning those people in any respect.

 

So that might be where, …

 

Aunt Sally: We were talking about the religion of, sorry, Mark, we were talking about the “Religion of Peace” [Islam]. That one.

 

Natty: No, I wasn’t talking about who he was talking about.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, that’s the reason why France has a very, very strict code of conduct when it comes to that kind of thing, and Jean Le Penn found that out.

 

So the way I read this book, and I do think, as I said, there were characters in it, but I never felt any of them were really fleshed out. I never felt you went on sort of a hero’s journey, or a villain’s journey for that matter. I never felt there was a decisive clash.

 

And I find that very interesting because when you read books, as I said, there’s often something happening on a macro level, but the book then focuses in on the micro level and how decisions by a number of hero characters change the course of history.

 

And I didn’t really find any heroes in this. There were people who wanted to stop this, but none of them were successful. There was the usual politicians who, despite people’s fears, did nothing about it and constantly talked about how this was actually going to make France a better place. I also thought that was interesting. It was almost like this guy, as I said, he was very, very prophetic.

 

And that is something I want to talk about because he predicted vast numbers of people coming to Europe, and I’ll take this from the Wikipedia, because this is very, very interesting. The migrants land in southern France and make their way north, and this is sort of an excerpt from the Wikipedia. It says:

 

“The immigrants make their way north, having no desire to assimilate to French culture, but continuing to demand a first world standard of living even as they flout laws, do not produce and murder French citizens, such as factory bosses, and shopkeepers, as well as the ordinary people who do not welcome them.

They are also joined by immigrants who already reside in Europe, as well as various Left-wing and anarchist groups across the West. More and more migrants arrive and have children rapidly growing to outnumber Whites. In a matter of months the White west has been overrun and pro-immigrant governments have been established while White people are ordered to share their houses and flats with immigrants.”

 

I’ve got to say that, …

 

Natty: Considering that was written in the 70s!

 

Mark Collett: I think the only thing at that point that he gets wrong is this happens over the course of months. And that might just be because he has to write a book, not a 40 part series. And obviously what we’re seeing isn’t taking place over months, it’s taking place over years. But it is the same thing.

 

But when you read that, and that is just the Wikipedia plot summary, so I’m not saying that’s equivalent to reading the book. But what I am saying is that little snapshot there is so on the money! And when I was born, I worked this out, I was born in 1980. And in 1980, Britain was around 95% White or White British. It was basically what we would describe as an ethno-state.

 

And if people had said to the average White Britain in 1980. Look, this is going to be the fate that White people will face by the 2020s, I don’t think many people would believe them. And this book was written in 1973. So a good seven years before I was born. So you would definitely be talking most Western European countries being easily 90% to 95%, maybe more, White. So this guy would you describe him as a prophet?

 

[21:39]

 

Natty: Well, he said, I think again, in the pre-book notes, or in his pre-word, he said it was almost like a vision that came to him. And I think one of the things to remember is, for whatever reason, and I’m sure more intelligent people will be able to drill down into this and know more about it than me, France seemed to be further along and more anti-racist, more accepting of the blacks from their former colonies in Africa than Britain was for whatever reason. Maybe they were 20 years ahead, 30 years ahead, whatever it was.

 

I mean, it’s all much of a likeness now, or maybe not, but certain their attitude was further along than we were. And I think probably for someone like Jean Raspail, who travelled to South America when he was little and travelled around and saw lots of different things and probably saw Paris. And as a writer, as a cultural contributor to kind of French writing, he probably had quite a good grasp on exactly how things would go down, which is why this book hit so hard, even though it was written way before anyone else could have said this was going to happen.

 

And for me, that makes it all the more jarring that the small hat tribe doesn’t get mentioned. He never once mentions kind of the jewish hands on the levers of power on the institutions. And I understand the reason why he can’t talk about that. But for anyone on, not the dissident Right, whatever you call it today, anyone who understands anything about the way politics works, reading this today, that’s one of the key takeaways one of the big omissions, big black holes in the middle of this book that kind of screams out to be filled.

 

He talks a lot about anarchists, and women’s libs, and lefties, and this kind of stuff, but absolutely no mention of jewish, …

 

[23:54]

 

Mark Collett: Well, that was another thing that got me. I don’t want to cut across you, but I was out at the big protest in Leeds at the weekend. I was obviously the final speaker at that protest because Patriotic Alternative, we were the ones who helped get that up and running. Wasn’t all us, but we certainly helped. And we brought the stage and everything.

 

And one thing that amazed me is at one point during that protest, or the rally, on that piece of common land, we were stood there and a group of Antifa charged across the road to attack us. Now, they were repelled by a mixture of football lads and locals who had come out, who actually gave the Antifa a bit of a hiding.

 

But then the police actually arrested the Antifa, and I think it was four or five of them actually were arrested. And the police immediately raised a dispersal order for anybody who wasn’t a nationalist, which is very interesting, certainly went in our favour on the day.

 

But one thing I find really, really interesting about this novel is that he linked all of these things together. And I was there, obviously, on Saturday. Behind me was a hotel filled with migrants, and there on their side were these anarchists, these Leftists, these anti-fascists. And I was speaking to young girls, to men, to women, in the area who were telling me about how they knew people who had been accosted, menaced, basically threatened by the migrants.

 

And there it was, these lefties defending them, defending their rights to be here. And to sort of put all of this together in 1973, I just find it pretty incredible! The whole book had lots of little bits in it that made me think this guy almost had a time machine [chuckling]!

 

So sorry, carry on Natty. That I just wanted to raise that point because this book was literally a snapshot of what he was saying was taking place in Leeds at the weekend!

 

Natty: Yeah, I totally agree. It’s going to be one thing that keeps coming up over and over again during this discussion is that he totally nails the way it is. And it would have been true five years ago. And I know that this book came to prominence, like you said, because I think Steve Bannon quoted it, or said it was part of his inspiration, and a lot of people read it after that.

 

Mark Collett: It was a book that when I was in the BNP, it was a book that was sold then and recommended then as well. It was known in dissident Right circles, but Bannon really pushed it into the stratosphere.

 

Natty: Yeah, well, that totally makes sense. But you’re right. Just like you said, this is on the eve of less than one day ago, you’re protesting potentially criminal migrants being housed in your neighbourhoods, and on their side of these Lefty anarchists, Antifa, whoever they are. And yet Jean Raspail writes exactly this situation, however many years ago it was.

 

And one of the vignettes, the kind of character interactions that happens towards the end of the book is this Lefty anarchist kind of faces off against the military forces that are on the coast. And he’s got a whole band of anarchist brigands who are just there to have fun and welcome these migrants. On the other side is this general, this colonel in the army, this Dragaris, I think he’s called, but he’s got a dwindling supply of men because they keep deserting and running away. But he’s pretty staunch and he’s pretty steadfast.

 

Mark Collett: But yeah, I just want to bring this up as well while you’re talking about the defense of the beaches. One thing I found really interesting in this, a lot of people in France are scared that this is going to happen. And I found this a wonderful sort of twist in the book that the French President basically orders the troops to go to the beaches. And you’re thinking, are they going to make a brave last stand?

 

But then he says:

 

“I will leave it down to every man’s conscience what they do.”

 

And instead, with that last twist, the President basically causes this mass desertion. And most of the army just throw their weapons down and run, don’t they?

 

Natty: Yeah, I guess it’s the start of the third act, and it’s alluded to throughout the rest of the book, but the eve before the migrants land. They’ve already beached the boats, but they’re waiting to come ashore on, I think it’s Easter Sunday. And everyone in France and everyone in the rest of the world because this event has triggered this kind of diverse uprising throughout the rest of the Western world. I think there’s demonstrations in London and New York.

 

So everyone’s tuned in to the President’s final message he’s going to give the country, although you don’t know it’s final, because it could have been that they could have pulled back from the brink. They could have stood up and blown these people away and gone and waged war on them. But like you said, he almost does it.

 

But then at the last, during his speech, he has this kind of change of heart where he says:

 

“I’m not going to order you to shoot them, it’s up to you.”

 

And because of this and because of this psychological experiment they carry out with the Navy, a few chapters previous, they realize that they can’t do it, they can’t shoot these poor unarmed people and these women and children who are storming up the beaches.

 

So you’re right, this triggers this waves of desertion. But one of the recurring themes throughout the book that’s kind of going maybe off topic here that we can get into I’m not sure if you guys have got notes on it, is the way that the fleet this horde of Hindus on the fleet is actually really violent, and uncaring, and unfeeling, and murders quite a few people on the docks as they’re boarding in India, on the crossing itself as this kind of this western fleet of do good rock bands and pope and all these other people try and board and give them supplies. They actually throw corpses over the side and beat one of the guys to death and all the rest of it.

 

But this is all hidden by the media because they don’t want the French people or the European people to see that this supposed poor, we just need help, we’re so weak and feeble. They don’t want these people to see that these are really nasty people and they’re capable of some really nasty things if they reach our shores.

 

And it’s like again, we come back to it, it’s so on the nose! It’s right there! He was writing about things that are happening exactly the way they’re happening now.

 

[31:22]

 

Mark Collett: Sally, what’s your thoughts about this thing? Would you call Jean Raspail a prophet? Do you think he was ahead of his time? I know you didn’t enjoy the book, but did you take anything positive from the book in terms of his ability to predict this nightmare future?

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, I think definitely, I’ve written that. I’ve got notes all over the place. But I’ve written many times:

 

“How did he know? How did he know that?”

 

And especially when you think he wrote it I think it was 1972. I’ve written down but you said 1973. But he must have thought about it years before. So the idea of the book probably a few years, and how did he know? How how did he know? Even the liberal thing about the liberals and, you know, that the women that were standing up for the refugees. He knew I grew up in this time. He was actually my father’s age, but he couldn’t have seen that. I know he travelled a lot, but I don’t know what on earth he could have seen that made him write it.

 

The other thing no one’s mentioned is that the refugees were men, women and children. They wasn’t just hordes of fighting age men. That’s a difference. I mean, I’m not sure what the proportion of women and children were, but women and children are mentioned a lot.

 

There’s one scene in it that they’re all having sex. Why am I listening to this? It is just horrible. [chuckling] But, yeah, much of it. You know what which bit I’m talking about in our tips. What the hell’s this? Why would they be doing that?

 

Natty: It’s pretty disgusting the way it’s written as well. He talks about semen flowing over brown bodies, and children involved and everything else. It’s really horrible!

 

Aunt Sally: The other thing is, he’s got a clear hatred, I think, hatred of people from India, because there’s barely a nice word about them. It made me think something must have happened to him that made him write like that, because he doesn’t talk about other, he doesn’t really mention any other races. There’s no Africans in there, is there? It’s all from people from the Ganges, that’s what he’s calling them.

 

And it’s like, why would they come from the Ganges? That was my big thing. Why would they go to France? I think the reasons were covered in the early chapters, where it was because they want what they’re entitled to. They want a share of the West’s wealth because they deserve it and they’re entitled to it. And I’m thinking, well, the Indians, why would they blame France? Surely they would be coming to England? Why France? I never really understood that. I don’t know if you did, Natty, because that really didn’t make sense to me, that it was Indians and not another race.

 

[34:38]

 

Natty: I don’t know where I read this, but I think I read that Jean Raspail actually chose to make it Indians, because making it Africans or sub-Saharan Africans, or North Africans would have been too easy, I think. Or they’re too alien. I think that’s paraphrasing what he said about it.

 

But then, strangely enough, the way he dehumanizes the Indians, you’re absolutely right. He couldn’t have written about them in a worse way. I think they’re eating poo and cooking with poo, I think there’s cannibalism on the fleet as well. This is one of the other things, …

 

Mark Collett: It’s every horror imaginable, isn’t it? The way he talks about them is this sort of floating ramshackle. And I’ve got to say this, one thing that I really liked as well is that they’re only able to get to the West because the West once colonized their part of the world and left these rotting boats there.

 

So there are all these old ramshackle boats that were once used by Western explorers and shipping companies that have just been dumped there. And they board them almost like a fleet of these boats, and they’re all sort of decaying. And some of them are sort of like lashed together to make them slightly more seaworthy. And they just set off on this slow journey.

 

But I did like the fact that it was almost sort of like the things we left behind for them, they use against us. I thought that was another subtle part of it. Sorry, carry on.

 

Aunt Sally: Even then, they’ve seized these ships, these rust buckets, I think he calls them, somewhere. But the amount of food that they would have, an organization that they would have had to have to bring those ships as far as France, that is fantasy, isn’t it? It just wouldn’t have been possible if these people were that starving, that they’re leaving their homeland to go to France for what they think is their fair share of Western wealth.

 

How on earth, could they afford to fill that ship with the food that they would have needed to get it sailing. And the fuel and the food and everything else? They couldn’t have been as poor. They couldn’t be that poor, could they? That didn’t make sense. Things have to make sense and add up to me. And it just, …

 

Natty: Sure, I know exactly what you mean. I’ve got this written down, actually, in that, …

 

Aunt Sally: You could probably explain it better. Yeah.

 

Natty: He gives a Ganges fleet this kind of constant miracle. He grants them constant miracles in order to get them where they need to be.

 

So I think the initial incident is this thing that happens at the Belgium embassy, where they say:

 

“We’re not taking any more orphans from India back to Belgium.”

 

And this triggers a stampede. A shot is fired and Agent Provocateurs actually whip up the crowd. Don’t just whip up the crowd, they whip up the whole of Delhi or wherever it is on the Ganges. Maybe it’s not Delhi. Into storming the docks.

 

Now, the fleet, it says, I think the numbers are 800,000, spread over 100 boats of varying sizes. Most boats carrying more than 1000 people each, obviously. But the speed that it travels, he does allude to the fact that thousands die on the route and they’re just even used as fire-lighting material, or thrown over the edge or eaten in some cases. And the fact that there’s no weather that stops this fleet, there’s no storms, there’s no anything that impedes this fleet in the slightest, it just makes its way there. There’s no talk about fuel, there’s no talk about leadership, …

 

Mark Collett: I read this completely differently to you. Carry on, then I’m going to give a slightly different story.

 

Natty: So, in my opinion, I mean, Jean Raspail, and I had this kind of theory as I was reading it, that maybe his granting the fleet this kind of just mythical ability to travel was maybe a cover for the JQ, in that it would have been NGOs helping these people out and buying fuel for them and supplying with food.

 

But in the book, they just manage it. It happens for them. I’ll be interested to hear what you’ve got to say about it.

 

[39:34]

 

Mark Collett: Well, I didn’t see it as something as complex as that. And I said I saw this as a bit like a horror film. And I’ll talk about what I mean. Often, something like, say, Jaws. You know, this monster is out there, you know, it’s coming. And throughout the film, you don’t really see the monster head on and the sort of true level of carnage it can cause.

 

I’ll give you a good example of a film like that. The recent first in the new Godzilla films, you saw lots of things sort of like telling you that something bad was going to happen. But it wasn’t until the end when you saw the true carnage of Godzilla sort of crashing through an American city. And I kind of felt that this film was like that, in that you knew that this monstrous human tide was coming, but you only saw it sort of crash on the beaches and the chaos toward the end of the book.

 

And one thing about a monster film that can make you feel unsettled is when the beast is relentless and unstoppable. And no matter what happens or no matter what you think might throw it off, it just keeps advancing.

 

So in horror films, you kind of have characters like Michael Myers who doesn’t matter how or Jason Voyage doesn’t matter how many times they’re shot or who chops at them with an axe or who hits them with a bat. They just keep coming relentlessly.

 

And I felt that Raspail sort of ascribed, like you say, it’s almost a horrifying, mythical, supernatural power to this fleet. But I also felt he did something else. He made it feel, by the end of the book, as you realize it’s coming, it’s coming, it’s coming, and it’s building in your stomach that this monster from like a horror film is unstoppable and it’s coming and it’s relentless.

 

But also from our point of view, from a racial point of view, an ethnic point of view, he made this feel inevitable. He made it feel like whatever you do, there is no turning this back! There is no changing this. This is the fate of the West. The West is fated to die! The West is fated to be defeated, to be destroyed at the hands of mass immigration, fueled by traitorous politicians.

 

And although he makes it clear that really in their heart of hearts, whether they express it or not, the vast majority of the normal French people who weren’t part of the government or weren’t part of these anarchist or liberal groups, they didn’t want it. But they just didn’t feel as if they could do anything other than flee, which I took as sort of a signal of White flight. And the way they moved north through the country with the White French fleeing north, thinking they could escape this if they got far enough north.

 

Basically, that’s what happens in Britain, isn’t it? They turn upon our southern coast and as they move north, people flee north! If I get to Yorkshire, I’ll be fine. Well, if I get to the northeast, I’ll be fine. Well, if I get to Scotland, I’ll be fine. And eventually it’ll be well, if I get to the Outer Hebrides, they won’t follow us there! But they follow you everywhere.

 

And I kind of felt, … Maybe a better way to put it is like The Terminator from obviously The Terminator films, this unstoppable force. And it really did sort of hit me that Raspail was saying:

 

“By the time this is all happening, it will already be too late to stop it!”

 

And I kind of saw this as his way of saying that this is a grim inevitability for the West. It’s the monster that you won’t be able to stop. But ironically, he more or less alludes to the fact it was a monster created by the West out of our own altruism, out of our own colonization, out of our own liberalism.

 

That’s how I saw it. I didn’t think there was anything more complex, hidden. But I did think he made it very much. This ever advancing terror, unstoppable terror, that was our destiny. Our destiny was to be destroyed by a monster of her own making. Have I got that completely wrong? I’ll ask both of you that question.

 

[44:11]

 

Natty: Well, funnily enough, one of the things that does differentiate it from today, is how much power the media personalities have, right? So the newspaper men and the radio, the radio people and the occasional address by this ambassador from India, or the ambassador from Belgium, or some minister from France is able to sway public opinion in a way that we wouldn’t really understand now, given that we’ve all got phones and Internet and the dissemination of information and news sources wide reaching and wherever you can get your information from wherever.

 

But one of the things that does keep the French from complaining too loudly and sway’s opinion is these big personalities, whether they’re on the radio or whether they’re in the newspapers of the time. And again, this is written in the 70s, so it’s understandable that those channels of communication or mass media were controlled that way.

 

And it’s actually one of the I’ll make this topical about recent times. One of the things we’re kind of grappling with right now is that certain sources of information or cultural touchstones for us, like the Babylon Bee, like maybe Steven Crowder, some other people who you kind of assume are on the dissident Right, or your side are being exposed as just bad actors. They’re supposed thought leaders, but they’re not good for you and they’re leading you down the wrong path and trying to divert you, act as gatekeepers and all the rest of it.

 

And it’s something that we have, I think since 2015, 2016, have been grappling with this and slowly exposing people. It’s very rare that someone can come on the scene now or turn up with a Telegram channel or turn up in someone’s media project, and not have questions asked about who they are, where they’ve come from or who’s funding them or any of that stuff. So again, it’s one of the things in this book that doesn’t sit right with the way things are today.

 

But you’re right, the people there are totally betrayed and their opinions are swayed by these people who stop them resisting, which is really interesting. And it’s the same thing they would try and do now, and they still do try and do now by banning people off social media, restricting their access.

 

Mark Collett: But I was just going to cut in there, mate. I do think there are increasingly people who don’t listen, but you’ve got to remember, I mean, just look at Piers Morgan. I mean, people joke that he’s the Gammon Whisperer, that he’s the one that when the public are actually at that point of snapping over something, he does an interview and sort of calms it down, or:

 

“Well, they’re not all bad. And this one here that I’ve got on the show, he’s not like the other ones.”

 

And do you still think, though, that there are some celebrities like that? There are Morgans, there are the Peter Hitchens, there are these sort of centrist people who would calm others.

 

And I’ll give you an example. I was on Twitter just looking at the response to our protest in Leeds at the weekend, and there was I don’t know whether this person really is a woman or if it really is the person who the account claims to be. But they were saying:

 

“Oh, well, I am completely against these migrants, but the idea of protesting outside a migrant hotel is disgusting! It’s anti-British! You are meant to be standing for the British people, but what you’re doing is the most anti-British thing! That’s their home. No British man, no decent British man would go out there and actually protest outside somebody’s home, making them feel uncomfortable. This is the most wickedly, un-British thing ever! Hang your heads in shame!”

 

And I looked at that and thought:

 

“That’s a very carefully constructed argument.”

 

But that’s the kind of argument that is designed to calm people into completing inaction.

 

And although I think that maybe the media doesn’t have the power it used to, there are still media figureheads. And I do still think there are, you know, subversive agents out there spreading this nonsense. The kind of people that will say:

 

“Well, I walked into the Gulag with my head held high and a smile on my face, because at least they couldn’t call me racist!”

 

And you’re thinking:

 

“So you did nothing for the last, 20 years except for agreeing with the government. Then the last moment, you made some meek protests and let them cart you off to the Gulag.”

 

Well, if you’d be a little less bothered about being called a racist for the last, 20 years, we could have actually done something. And I do think there are other things that sort of have emerged as sort of mind control devices that would stop people taking action, even in a horrific case like this, where there is literally an invasion fleet on its way.

 

[49:19]

 

Aunt Sally: One of the things about the book that did strike me was the word “racism” and the fact that he wrote it when Enoch Powell made that famous speech, And I asked my mum, what’s “racism”, and she said:

 

“It’s people that don’t like black people.”

 

And I said:

 

“Does that mean your one?”

 

And she said:

 

“Yes!”

 

And I thought:

 

“Oh!”

 

And then there was this drive from the press that Enoch Powell’s a racist and this and that. And that’s when that word first became for me, was a thing like, you mustn’t be a racist, they’re the worst things ever.

 

But he knew, he must have known that that word was the tool that was going to lead to political correctness and excuses for not standing up for what’s right and wrong for your own race. He knew it. He knew a lot. It just makes me think what I’ll always wonder, where did he get his knowledge from? How? I mean he travelled? I wonder what he saw. He knew too much and I’d love to know how he knew it.

 

And it crossed my mind that maybe he got some of it from the Bible? Some of what’s happening from the Bible? From Revelations in particular. Yeah, there’s a bit in Revelations about nation on nation, nation on nation being race against race. That’s what it means. But, yeah, I do think he got it from there. I forgot what was going to say next. So carry on.

 

Natty: I think we were talking about the fact that the people in France were betrayed by the media and their politicians. And actually that is going to lead me on to say something else, or kind of change the direction of this thing.

 

Mark, you talk about the fact that the fleet is kind of this creeping horror that’s going to end up in France, I think I guess Raspail chose France because it was his country. He understood it. He understood how beautiful the southern coast was in Provence and this total juxtaposition of this fleet of tramp steamers filled with emaciated brown Indian people covered in semen and poop, [chuckling] wading ashore into Provence, into one of arguably the most beautiful coastal regions in the world, the most well maintained and the most gorgeous, the best climate in the world.

 

But as always, and this is a theme that’s true in any major shift in history, it’s not the outsider that does you in, in the end, it’s your own countrymen! It’s the traitors inside your country. It’s the media. There’s one odious character called Clement Dio who’s a kind of mixed race, wealthy newspaper guy, who’s constantly attacking nationalists or people with nationalist sentiments.

 

There’s an incident with Arabs in a swimming pool and he just ruthlessly goes after, using his newspaper, he goes after the town council for trying to ban these Arabs from the swimming pool because it’s spreading syphilis and their pestering girls and stuff. So there’s this horrible anti-White mixed race guy called Clement Dio who eventually gets his comeuppance. And that’s one of the good things about this book, is that a lot of the scumbags and people who screw France over and screw Europe over, end up getting killed and brutalized. And I think that was Jean Raspail’s way of having his own version of revenge on these people, even if the West did fall.

 

[53:31]

 

Mark Collett: Well, I thought that was very realistic! Because all the people you see this in the in the UK, when you see these sort of liberal White women go on these BLM marches and something horrific happens to them all. And these things do happen! And I thought again, I didn’t think it was his way of getting revenge. I just thought it was prophetic. I thought that eventually the liberals meeting their end at the policies they advocated for was absolutely true.

 

And you could take that and you see it’s when I read bits like that, I’m not sure whether he was prophetic or just very good at reading history, because obviously that brings you to sort of the Haitian Revolution, where during the Haitian Revolution, the blacks, the mixed race and White collaborators took power over Haiti.

 

But as soon as they had taken power, it wasn’t long before the blacks and the mixed race did away with the White collaborators. So even the Whites that helped them, they then did away with. And shortly afterwards, many of the mixed race were also killed because they formed a strata above the black Haitians.

 

And it is with an understanding of history that you do start to look at this and say, maybe he did base certain aspects, not say, the migrant flotilla or anything like that. I mean, that would be unprecedented in his time. But there were certain historical aspects to the book, like the Haitian revolution, which I think he would have had a very strong knowledge of.

 

Natty: Yeah, for sure. Yeah, absolutely. And you kind of think about the people in this country. Now you extrapolate, we think, well, maybe not this country, but someone like Sean King or, …

 

Mark Collett: Sorry to butt in mate, sorry, sorry to butt in, but I just wanted to point out as well the reason he would have had such a great knowledge of the Haitian revolution, because obviously that was an insurrection against French colonial rule. So that may well have been something that as a Frenchman of that era, he was very well read on, because Haiti was originally a French colony. And the French there that did side with the revolutionaries were killed shortly afterwards.

 

Natty: Yeah, absolutely.

 

Aunt Sally: That makes sense. That answers my question, because it’s one of the things I was wondering, where did he get all this from? What made him write this book? Where did the ideas come from? It must have come from that, and he might have known people.

 

Natty: Well, if you think about what would happen to someone like Akala, or Alfa Hirsch, or Ash Sarkar, for instance. If this was to happen in the same way as the book, and even in different ways, these people wouldn’t be needed. They’ve been stabbing and jabbing at the stumbling, the shuffling kind of walking catastrophe that is the UK. And these guys have been jabbing their knives in and trying to draw blood.

 

But come any sort of revolution that these people would cheer on, they’d be the first to go. They wouldn’t have any place. And I think Jean Raspail understood that, especially in what happens to Clement Dio, which is his kind of personification of all of these people. Like you say, the White collaborator.

 

In Clementio’s case, he’s a mixed race, but he runs into a gang of escaped criminals, many of them black or Africans, who have been let out of his prison. And at first he’s kind of jokey and matey with him. And I think he’s got a Chinese wife with him who’s very attractive, and they start drinking together. And by the end of it, he’s beaten up and locked in an upstairs room and they’re downstairs in the bar raping his wife for three days. I can’t remember if he dies afterwards or whether they kill him or what happens.

 

But again, this is before the fleet even lands. So the army has its teeth taken away by the President, by the media, by the people of Provence running away, because they don’t have the have the stomach, or the heart, or the institutions behind them to stand up for themselves and defend their own patch of land.

 

So the French army has the artillery, has the navy, it has all these prestigious regiments who have travelled around the world and conquered and gone to war, but it’s not the problem that they’ve got of that. And they’re facing this fleet. Everything behind them has collapsed and the people inside the country have turned against them, essentially, and they can’t defend their land anymore. They don’t have the moral fortitude, they don’t have the institutions on their side. They don’t have the backing of anyone.

 

And in that case, if the enemy at your front is easy to see, but the enemy at your back is one that’s just constantly stabbing you and taking away your troops and trying to cause desertions and all the rest of it and sabotaging your supply lines. You can see why everything just fell apart at the end of a book and happened the way it did.

 

Mark Collett: Do you have anything to add on that one, Aunt Sally?

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah. No, I think most of the book seems to centre around the actual journey, the journey and what’s happening in press offices and governments. That’s all politics. And I hate politics! I really do. But it was all about this impending doom.

 

And if it did remind me of any horror movie, it was Walking Dead. It’s just like they keep coming, they keep coming. And then when they think they’ve got rid of all the hordes of zombies. There’s more coming. There’s more coming. It was all this impending doom and gloom that’s coming and then accepting their fate, they’re not going to make a stand. They’re not going to fight. They’re not going to fight for it. I’d understand that if it was men, women and children, which it was, I’d get it.

 

What would happen if that was the case? If this flotilla of people, real, genuine refugees, were coming from the Ganges and they were men, women and children, then different governments would plan where they’re going to go and make the rest of Europe take some of them, not just allow them all to land in France. So, again, when things don’t make sense to me, I can’t really take it seriously. It’s like this whole flotilla is going to France. Why?

 

[1:01:02]

 

Natty: I think that was one of the reasons why Raspail wrote it Sal. The way he did so was he deliberately took those decisions away from the governments of the West. Every interaction they try and have with the fleet is ignored. They don’t want anything to do with help, or aid, or anything else. There’s no radios on board the fleet. They’re just going where they go.

 

And interestingly, an incident where it looks like they might be heading for the Suez Canal. I don’t know if you guys remember this part of the book. But the Egyptian government only has one navy boat. So it’s got this old Second World War destroyer that’s kind of on its last legs. It’s been afloat for the last 40, or 50 years. It’s barely held together. And it’s the one navy boat that Egypt possesses.

 

But the Egyptian government, which still has some balls and does not want these people in their country and is still led by people who are willing to say as much, doesn’t want this fleet coming through the Suez Canal and ending up grounding. And then they’ll have to deal with it.

 

So the Egyptian government sends out this single navy boat and tells the captain:

 

“You stop that fleet and you turn it around by any means necessary!”

 

And the guy pulls up alongside. Again, there’s no radios. So he just shouts over the loud hailer and fires like a stream of antiaircraft, like cannon fire over the bridge. And the kind of crippled quadriplegic who’s in charge [chuckling] of this fleet is shocked into turning it around.

 

So this show of force by this crappy beat up old navy boat. But because the person who’s in charge of that boat and the person who’s giving him his orders is prepared to do what’s necessary. They managed to turn this fleet around and avert disaster for Egypt.

 

And there’s absolutely none of that will, or backbone in the West anywhere to make that kind of decision! France ends up getting the refugees. So it’s this interesting juxtaposition between the Egyptian navy, which achieves it’s aim with one rusty old tub with like an antiaircraft gun on it, versus the entire fleets of Western Europe who are utterly toothless and can’t do a single thing about it.

 

Mark Collett: I thought that was interesting as well. And something else I liked about the book. And I’ve talked about this many times before on streams. And when I’ve appeared on other people’s, shows. That this book, although it does take place primarily in France, by the end of the book, he’s made it clear that virtually every Western nation has been consumed by this. This sort of flotilla leads to sort of a knock on effect which basically destroys everything. And the last holdout is Switzerland.

 

But eventually, because every other country is now completely overrun with migrants and liberals and has succumbed to this nightmare, Switzerland is seen as this rogue state and basically that is forced to capitulate as well. And eventually everywhere succumbs to this nightmare.

 

And I thought that was really important too, and I speak about this quite a lot, as I said, on other streams and shows that this is a White issue. And a lot of people say:

 

“Oh, Mark, you shouldn’t talk with all these Americans and people from overseas, you should stick to just what’s going on in Britain!”

 

But this isn’t a British problem. And I thought Jean Raspail made it very clear that this wasn’t just a French problem in the book. That this led to absolute world-wide changes! Every Western nation ends up succumbing to this madness! Every Western nation ends up being crushed under this tidal wave of migrants! And really what could be described as anti-White policy.

 

[1:05:20]

 

And I thought that was very interesting too, because he realized in 1973 that despite what he felt was coming to France, that everywhere would go along with this, that you wouldn’t have Britain as an outlier, you wouldn’t have a resurgence of militant nationalism in Germany that would save Germany. America wouldn’t stand alone as the last bastion of the White nuclear family in their quaint houses with white picket fences. He knew this was going to be something that would essentially affect what would be described as the whole Western world.

 

And I do think that’s a very, very important point. And it’s also very indicative of his level of understanding of this problem, that it isn’t a madness that just affects a country, it’s a madness that infects, or an ethnicity for that matter. It doesn’t just affect the English. But it’s passed over the Scottish. This is a madness that infects our entire race!

 

And at the end of the book, essentially the whole West has sunk. He more, or less, says that. But you would think there be some small communities in parts of America, that would stand strong against it and remain there during the collapse of civilization. But obviously we’ll never know. I don’t believe unless he tells me otherwise, that. He did a follow up about any resistance. I think he left it at the end with complete destruction. In very many ways, as Natty said, probably to shock people and to make people think, look, you need to do something now before it’s too late.

 

But, yeah, to see this as not just a French thing, but as a White thing, I thought that was very important as well, because there’s still people out there who don’t understand that this is an anti-White thing, that this isn’t about being British, or French, or German, it’s about being White.

 

Natty: Yeah. And throughout the book there’s a couple of scenes where there’s a few Summits between the European nations. And it’s quite clear that I think Italy says:

 

“Oh, no, we can’t take them because we’ve got to think of the Catholic Church! And the fact that the Pope is here!”

 

And Britain says:

 

“Oh, well, we can’t take them, because we’ve got colonial ties with India. And all the rest of it.”

 

And they’re so happy when they don’t have to deal with this fleet. They’re totally, like, inward looking. If they can just have a few more months, or a few more years where they don’t have to deal with this.

 

And it’s exactly the same situation in the West. I mean, anyone with even half a brain cell can see where the current system of governance and culture is leading, and it’s nowhere good. I mean, it’s leading to what this book prophesies, basically.

 

We all understand this, and I’m pretty sure everyone listening understands this as well. Even if there’s people listening to this who hate us, or are working for the state, they know what’s coming. They know, whether it’s in 20 years, whether it’s in 50 years, if things carry on the way they are, it’s going to be bad for everyone. Not just not just us, because we’re raising our voices against it, but for you too, there’s going to be no progress, no improvement of the people you call your family and your ancestors. And all the rest of it.

 

The other interesting thing I found was, obviously France has a colonial past, and so does the UK. But this idea that this fleet is kind of retribution for the West completely ignores the fact that the same thing is happening in, like, Sweden and Denmark, which never expanded into Africa, or the Middle East, or anything like that.

 

Australia, or like you said, Mark, in the book, Jean Raspail, has this happening everywhere where there’s White people, right? So Australia, South Africa. And this book was written before apartheid ended. So while the Whites were still in charge in South Africa. And there’s quite an interesting part of the book which we haven’t touched on yet, that happens with South Africa.

 

But this happens everywhere and it has no bearing, and no worries about who did what in the past. It’s coming for all of you. I think you’ve kind of alluded to that with the idea of this being like a horror, a horror book, as well. TRS some horror aspects to this fleet and what it brings with it.

 

[1:10:01]

 

Aunt Sally: Yes, I’ve got notes on the bit about South Africa. And the fact that, well, he knew all this. He knew all this to write the book. But he didn’t know about South Africa. He didn’t see that coming, did he? It seemed out of place, the South Africa, but knowing what we know now, and now knowing what’s happened in South Africa, that he wrote this book, the one place that succumbed big time. In fact, they went first, didn’t they? That he didn’t foresee that it’s a strong White nation in the book still. And it turns them away as well.

 

I’m sorry. I’m not saying, … I just hated the book! [chuckling] I can’t say anything good about it! All I can think is, like, the audio of his voice, Alex Linder’s voice. Just these:

 

“Brown, putrid bodies!”

 

That’s all it’s saying. It’s horrible! Just words that he’s describing people, non-stop, being just filth! It’s affected me. It’s a horrible book! Sorry, you both liked it. I’m struggling to talk about it, because I’m almost traumatized by reading it. It’s awful. Yeah. Who suggested it? Was it you? Was it you Natty? I know.

 

Natty: Yeah.

 

Aunt Sally: Please.

 

Natty: I wasn’t sure where else I could find it as an audio book. I only knew about the Alex Linder reading of it. I found that Alex Linder emphasizing the kind of horror, the kind of body horror of the Indian fleet added to the book. Maybe it’s a male thing, I’m not sure, [chuckling] but it made it all the more pressing. What’s happening in the book.

 

As to South Africa, it is interesting, because South Africa does the same thing as Egypt. Because obviously the fleet leaves India, and initially it looks like it’s head for the Suez Canal, but it turns south, because of this one action by the Egyptian government with their rusty old torpedo boat, rusty old destroyer. So it turns south and has the head around the Cape of Africa. So around South Africa. If you can imagine it on the map. And initially, because South Africa is a White country. And it’s still in the hands of the White South Africans there, they think, well, maybe the fleet is going to stop there. Because it’s a prosperous country, they could get welfare. And all the rest of it.

 

But the South African government does the same thing as the Egyptian government and makes it clear in no uncertain terms, they are going to open fire on this fleet if they try and land in South Africa. They’re completely uncaring. They’re totally used to dealing with a majority population. In the case of South Africa, of these blacks that they’re in charge of, they know exactly how to deal with them. They know that you threaten and then you use violence. And that’s how you get the job done. And that’s how they treat the fleet. And it works. The fleet just sails past.

 

As a result, there’s this howling and screeching from the media, in this case, the French media. Because that’s who it’s focused on. And the ambassador is shunned and all this other stuff, and South Africa is racist and all this, and all that. And they go on and on. But at the end of the day, they achieve their aims. And the fleet sail was passed, even going so far as to throw off the aid that the South Africans try and give them, to help them keep moving.

 

So, yeah, it’s interesting that South Africa had the military might and the will to do that, but then, like you said, a few years later, it falls and is now where it is, which is not a good place. He didn’t foresee that, I’ll give you that Sal!

 

Mark Collett: Just one other thing as well, about the Egyptian Navy obviously being able to turn back the whole flotilla just with one boat. Do you think it was his way of saying, and this could all be ended so easily and the West will just do nothing to end it? Because obviously the Egyptians did very easily manage to avert the crisis landing on their shores. And that is very true, isn’t it?

 

So you could even draw an analogy between that and what happened during Covid. So during Covid the Royal Navy managed to have boats constantly patrolling the English Channel with the intention of arresting sun bathers, or swimmers, or anybody going out and enjoying the summer during the 2020 Covid. But the same navy that can patrol every inch of those beaches to ensure that there’s no sunbathers there, now can’t do a single thing to stop migrants landing on those beaches in their hundreds, or thousands every day.

 

And I do think he makes an important point there as well. This migrant crisis that we’re living through now, even though he’s not here to see it, it could all be stopped with such great ease, couldn’t it? They could literally close that southern border with a stroke of a pen!

 

[1:15:53]

 

Natty: Oh, that’s one of the things that is totally clear with what you’re saying, is that it’s not that the government. I mean, in the book, Jean Raspail does take the teeth away from the government.

 

But in regards to where we are now it’s not that the government doesn’t have teeth and willingness to use force and use violence. But they don’t want to use it for the good of the country. They want to use it to repress their own people, arrest people for Twitter, things they write on Twitter.

 

You’re absolutely right! Any single person with just an ounce of moral fiber knows how to stop those migrant boats. And maybe there’d be involved, who knows? But it wouldn’t be hard, like you say, to even discuss this sounds stupid, because it’s so easy. It would be so ridiculously easy. And yet our own government is facilitating it!

 

This is what I mean. It’s not the problem that there’s 50,000 migrants in France who want to come across a Channel in small boats. The problem is that the government is helping them and wants to house them and pay the money when they get here! It’s totally the running theme is that in this book. And what now is that you’re going to get betrayed by the people in charge who hate you, and have this kind of pathological altruism that they’ve instilled into everyone. This kind of multiracial Diversity is Our Strength. You all know for slogans. This is a knife that’s jammed into your back using these slogans and using this kind of mass brainwashing.

 

Yeah, the government absolutely has a teeth to do certain things and take hard measures and take necessary steps if it feels as necessary, like arresting people for sunbathing! But stopping violent criminals, landing on your shore in little rubber dinghies:

 

“No, if we can’t do that! It’s too difficult, it costs too much money!”

 

Whatever. Pick your excuse!

 

Aunt Sally: It’s interesting that you said that, Mark, because I hadn’t thought of it.

 

But you’re right that the Egyptian fleet and the South African, how easy it was to turn them back. He’s showing thid. And what do we make of that? What Natty just said? They want it all engineered for a reason by people that don’t like us.

 

Mark Collett: Right. So we do have some Superchats. We don’t have many tonight. But we’ve got a few. So let’s do the ones we have, because we’ve only got about 35 minutes of this show left. So let’s do those. And then we can discuss a bit more of the book, or if anything else comes in, we can answer those as well.

 

So these are all from the same guy. He calls himself “A Stupid Moron”. I don’t know why he calls himself that, because he’s always very kind. So thank you for these Superchats. His first Superchat is he says:

 

“Hi, Mark. Pat Buchanan recently retired from writing. He was as close as a dissident Right figure to make the mainstream as we got. A good book to cover is The Death of the West. He was talking about demographics in the 1990s.”

 

Would you guys be interested in doing a Pat Buchanan book?

 

Natty: Yeah, absolutely. I keep hearing about him. I hear about him in circles and Telegram chats all the time. But, yeah, definitely. I’d certainly be up for that.

 

Aunt Sally: I would. I wouldn’t mind.

 

Mark Collett: It’s quite interesting. That people are brought up The Death of the West. And it’s interesting, because that was another book that I believe. If I’ve got this right, that was recommended reading when I was in the BNP. Yeah, it definitely was. It was originally published in 2001. Camp of the Saints was definitely recommended and Death of the West was as well. I remember Buchanan’s name being thrown around.

 

But I also think Pat Buchanan was somebody he was very, very he was a lot sort of more mainstream than, say, the people we usually have on this show. So it was interesting that he decided to basically write a book that sort of incendiary. He did go down sort of a line that the West was being destroyed by demographic change.

 

And he also was somebody who sought presidential nomination for the Republican Party. So it was quite interesting to see somebody who was that high up actually go down the route of talking about demographics in such an open way. Thank you for that Superchat.

 

The next one says:

 

“Recent Daily Mail article showed that 250,000,000, that’s 250,000,000, Latinos alone now want to migrate to the US. We are talking about Armageddon of Western civilization here.”

 

Yeah. Because obviously we get the dinghies. And the dinghies are resulting in some sort of quarter of a million illegal migrants washing up on Britain’s shores every year. But that land border between America and Mexico is obviously a huge, huge threat to America’s current demographic balance, which is already teetering on the brink.

 

What do you guys think about that? Do you think that America [word unclear] what is going to change when America does hit that demographic tipping point? Do you think that could be something that fundamentally, although will be disastrous for White Americans, do you think that could actually be something that could lead to America being supplanted by China, or even Russia as the global superpower?

 

[1:22:06]

 

Natty: That’s an interesting question. It’s quite hard to predict what would happen. There’s definitely all of the intangible qualities that European that allowed America to become strong will slowly be lost as the demographics. I know it’s not exactly happening slowly, but as it changes, things just become worse and shittier and infrastructure becomes worse. American culture, there’s a certain, like, hollowness to it as well. The way the roads are laid out, you don’t walk anywhere. It’s all just buy this and advertising. So it’s not hard to imagine that at some point in the near future, the hordes coming up from South America who are totally on board, by the way, … Again, another aside. Sorry to keep doing this.

 

Another aside is that the people like White Europeans, we’ve got a certain taste for our media. And you have to kind of cater to that you have to tell stories that are good. This is why so much of kind of dissident adjacent circles are constantly harping on about how crap the new Lord of Rings is, or how crap the new Star Wars is, or how soulless Marvel films are. All the rest of it.

 

However, it seems like a lot of the people who they are trying to replace Europeans with successfully don’t have any of those hangups. They’re more than happy to just consume this garbage storytelling, this garbage crappy films and media and music that they just pump out to keep people entertained. And I think that’s part of the reason why they’re so keen to bring them in. I mean, it serves a dual purpose. It’s quick money and it replaces White people, which it seems to be what every establishment is hell bent on doing! And does it mean they’re going to lose out to China and Russia? Well, Russia, who knows? But China, yeah.

 

I mean, there’s no reason why it shouldn’t. There’s no reason why a country full of deracinated Mexicans, or Hondurans, or Brazilians, or whoever it is, is going to outcompete China who has a strong, if nothing else you can say about them has a strong sense of who they are and kind of this work ethic that means they are competitive and they’re willing to export and sell and buy. And all the rest of it.

 

So, yeah, I don’t see why not.

 

[1:24:40]

 

Mark Collett: You’ve got to remember as well, that the Chinese are very interesting people, in that they are racially aware. And they are all very, very proud to be Chinese and want China to be the best! They want China to be the preeminent global superpower. Now, there are very few Britons alive today that want Britain to be a global superpower. And that’s a very interesting thing.

 

And you even see that in the gaming world. If you ever play a computer game, and you get beaten by somebody from China, you will just hear them screaming down the microphone:

 

“China number one! China number one!”

 

They want to dominate everything. [chuckling] They’ve got this sort of fierce racial pride in everything they do. And it’s comical! Because if I beat somebody, Call of Duty Wars, and if we win a game which very rarely happens, I can assure you, I don’t scream down the mic, :

 

“Britain’s number one!”

 

Even for somebody like me, that would seem absurd.

 

But they have national pride in everything they do, even winning an online multiplayer game, which tells you an awful lot about the Chinese as a people. And I think that’s very important. And I do think it does put you into this mindset that as America becomes more racially mixed and the more the Whites, completely deracinated, and there is an uptick in this sort of racial turmoil and diversity hires, which always seem to result in lower productivity and more chaos, you can see China just surpassing the US in every sense. And when that happens, well, there’s going to be a complete rebalancing of power. And I think you will know when that has happened. Because the first casualty will be Taiwan will be invaded.

 

Aunt Sally, do you have any comments on the Chinese?

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, I agree with what you said.

 

I mean, they really have a racial pride of themselves as a people. They don’t deserve to have it about their products, because everything I get is Chinese. I’ve got to the point now where I look to see where something’s made. And if it’s Chinese I’m not buying it, because it’s junk. It’s junk!

 

But one of the things that puzzles me is trade, like how trade works. And it’s going off topic. But it’s like, if I want to buy something from America, just a book, just a book from America, it costs $40 to get imported here.

 

But if you buy something from China, it’s free. So I don’t know what the trade deals are, but no wonder China is a superpower when our government have something in place where they get free postage everywhere.

 

As far as the politics go, China and Russia are superpowers. And I think India is going to be the next one. It’ll be the third superpower. And we are deracinated. We are a global minority now. And that really, really worries me, particularly when you think that of that minority, an awful lot of those are boomers. Sorry, Mark, I’m not up on politics. I don’t really, I’m not listening to the news anymore.

 

Mark Collett: Okay. Thank you for that. The same Superchatter said:

 

“Hey, Mark and PA, Europe and the US have enjoyed multiculturalism and diversity. But now it’s Israel’s turn. Please help and support the message of open borders for Israel.”

 

Thank you very much. Also said:

 

“Even Colonel Gaddafi warned about Europe turning black in 2009. He noted, millions of sub-Saharan Africans want it to come in. If an African leader can recognize this, Western leaders are complicit.”

 

Now, this, I think, is really, really interesting. Really interesting, the Colonel Gaddafi stuff.

 

Now, Colonel Gaddafi was somebody who did prevent migrants flooding through his country. And he was a blockade, if you like, to mass migration into Europe. But he was obviously completely shut down and prevented from doing that. Obviously, his country was destabilized, and with a Western backed coup, he was killed.

 

But isn’t it really amazing, when you think about it, that he was saying, he said a long time ago that people were to get rid of him, if people were to do away with Gaddafi and his regime, that would lead to this absolute tidal wave of people flooding through Libya to get to Europe. And that’s what happened.

 

And Western leaders, for no real reason, destabilized Libya and replaced him as leader, even though they have no business. Libya is obviously a sovereign nation.

 

I mean, Natty and Aunt Sally, I don’t know how much you want to talk about this. But that’s an interesting point, isn’t it? It sort of plays into things that Jean Raspail was talking about, that the Western liberal elite are playing every card in their hand in order to bring this about, even to the point of destabilizing nations, which obviously always leads to further mass immigration.

 

[1:30:28]

 

Natty: So I actually had this in my notes about the book in that there are these kind of linchpin moments in history, the shooting of Franz Ferdinand that kicked off the First World War, the invasion of Poland, maybe as part of what happened in the Second World War. In the book, this incident at the Belgian embassy kicks off the invasion fleet heading to Europe.

 

But in reality, it was Gaddafi and the destruction of Libya and the destruction of Gaddafi’s government that led to this.

 

And if you put your conspiracy hat on, although I guess it’s not really conspiratorial to say that if Gaddafi understood this, when he was saying, :

 

“If you get rid of me, you are going to face this tidal wave of people flooding up from Africa in the Middle East and wherever else coming across the Mediterranean.”

 

If he understood that, then the people who were getting rid of him, namely the American regime, they obviously understood that too, which has to make you think, well, that’s exactly what they wanted, or part of what they wanted, whether it was a bonus on top of whatever else they were doing in the region. That’s what happened.

 

And as a result, not only did it lead to this gathering of people on the southern shores of the Mediterranean who wanted to cross to the northern shores, that’s just procedural, right? But it showed and exposed something that the book talks about as well, is that Europe had no backbone and no moral fiber to deal with it and stop it happening.

 

So, of course, everyone sees this, everyone recognizes it and so it just continues at pace and picks up pace. And even when it was happening back in, I think it was 2016, or 2015, people in this country were warning:

 

“This is going to be happening in the Channel soon enough. We’re a couple of years away from all of this being on our doorstep.”

 

And, of course nothing was done about it. Everyone just kind of turned over. Politicians ignore that kind of warning. And now, here we are. So history is a continuation. It’s not just stop, start, there’s cause and there’s effect, for everything.

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah. The thing about Gaddafi, I remember him and I had so much admiration for him when I was younger, just, :

 

“Oh, Gaddafi is doing this.”

 

And I’m talking through the 80s and 90s. He was almost a bit of a hero, if I’m honest. But the media did everything they could to demonize him. And they made out he was evil incarnate. But you could see through it. I could see through it. Like he ruled his country with an iron rod. I think they loved him, didn’t they? His people? They didn’t hate him. Although the press would make out that he was an evil despot, wouldn’t they?

 

But I was actually quite sad when they killed him. But at the time, I wasn’t aware of what’s going on now. I didn’t see the connection. But he was so right, what he said was going to happen, happened. And the rest really it’s all happening now, isn’t it? Just because of that one man’s death this is all happening. But, yeah, I liked him. I kind of had respect for Saddam Hussein as well. I’m not sure what was lies and what was truth, what we were told about.

 

Mark Collett: Everything was lies with him. I mean, he literally didn’t do anything. He didn’t have any of the Weapons Of Mass Destruction that they said he did. He just wanted a strong state for his people.

 

[1:34:15]

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, and I saw at the time, he was another evil incarnate as far as our media was concerned. But I saw things about his people loving him and shrines to him and thinking:

 

“Well, how could they love him? How’s that happening?”

 

I mean, do you remember all these dead children that were gassed by Saddam Hussein that our media put out? So now, I can look back to things in the media, things in the press at the time, the propaganda they were giving us to hate somebody. And it was like all these children that he poisoned gassed.

 

I don’t know if you remember that photo, because it was quite an iconic photo at the time, these little Toddlers just laying face down dead because of him. And then what followed from that was, I don’t think they killed him then. But there was a drive to arrest him and catch him and kill him. But, yeah, I didn’t know what to make of him. But I didn’t quite believe what I was reading, even though I didn’t know what I know now.

 

Mark Collett: You know what’s always interesting as well, Sally. And I’m going to pose this question to you both. But I want you to answer it first. Obviously, gassings have a very special cultural power over us. But haven’t you noticed whenever a mad Middle Eastern despot has to be taken care of, it’s always because they’ve gassed somebody! It was the same with Al Assad in Syria. It was a gas attack! That was the reason why America had to start dropping bombs with Saddam Hussein. He gassed his enemies. And do you think this is something that is used, because it obviously has a mental connection for people to that certain history that people have been completely brainwashed over?

 

Aunt Sally: You know what I mean? He gassed his enemies. No, he killed children. Men, women and children. That was what we were shown. That was all the photos in the newspaper of these poor little Toddlers, these little Arab children all laying in the sand, frothing at the mouth. And I’ve seen something as well with the White Hats. They’ve done that quite a few times, the gassing thing.

 

But, yeah, this does seem to be a fixation with gassing going on somewhere, doesn’t it? That’s for sure. I forgot about Assad as well. He’s supposed to have done it. Why would you gas them? Why would you gas them? So there’s evidence. You just round them all up and throw them in hole, bury them! Why gas them and then let people take photos of it?

 

Natty: Careful Sally! [chuckling] It was a stupid, dubious incident in Syria that almost led us in there. Yeah, history repeats itself!

 

Mark Collett: It certainly does. We’ve got some final Superchats. One more from a good friend who sent several ones he put:

 

“Camp of the Saints was ahead of its time. Steve Sailor is the only person talking about the most important statistic in the world. 4.5 billion Africans by 2100! 50% of the youth want to go to Europe.”

 

Yeah, as we said throughout this stream, the one thing that Jean Raspail got wrong for me was where this was coming from. Now, I’m not saying Indians don’t want to come here. I’m not saying that having lots of Indians coming here would be a bad thing. Of course it would. But I don’t see this Indian problem.

 

The problem is Africa. And Africa is the one part of the world where the population growth is, you know, explosive! And they are going to be heading here. I remember back in my early days of YouTube, I did a video saying 100 million Africans, or 200, I can’t remember it’s either 100 million, or 200 million headed to Europe. And this came from a speech from, actually, a French official, which is quite poetic considering we’re talking about a French author and a book which is largely set based around the fate of France.

 

But, yeah, they are coming here in large numbers. Rory Herbert gave £3. Thank you so much, Rory. And he said:

 

“Dear Mark, would you consider reviewing the novel Lord of the Flies, written by William Golden in 1954, or the film of the same name?”

 

I think it might be an interesting topic. Because yeah, you know what? I’ve actually read The Lord of the Flies. It’s been a long time since I have. And I always found that book quite disturbing, especially the end. There’s a lot that can be taken from that. I would be actually interested in reading Lord of the Flies again.

 

And as I say, I remember reading that in school. And Cheesy Watson gave a generous £25. Thank you so much, my friend. He said:

 

“Another book on a similar theme to Camp of the Saints is Fugue.”

How do you pronounce that? F-U-G-U-E. How do you pronounce hat Natty? I’m expecting you all know, because I don’t.

 

Natty: Sorry, Mark, I’m struggling to hear you. My audio is breaking up a little bit there.

 

Mark Collett: How do you pronounce the word? F-U-G-U-E?

 

Aunt Sally: Is it French?

 

Natty: Fugue? I think you could be in a fugue state. I think.

 

[1:40:03]

 

Mark Collett: Yes, that’s it. I didn’t want to read it out incorrectly:

 

“Fugue for a Darkening Island by Christopher Priest. It details civil war when African refugees flood Britain. Interesting. It was published around 1971, just before Camp of the Saints. Not sure if it’s any good, though.”

 

I would definitely be interested in reading that if it’s similar. And this is African refugees flooding Britain. And it was published in 1971.

 

By the way, Sally, you were correct. He wrote the book, or finished the book in 1972, when I said it was he wrote it in 1973. What I meant was it was originally published in 1973. But yeah. Thank you for that, Cheesy. What’s it. I’m going to see if that one is actually available.

 

And, yes, it is. You can get that on Ebay for as little as £3.49. And I’ll read you the premise of this. The novel story is told in an acronylogical fashion, jumping back and forth between several time periods. The protagonist, a former Professor of English named Alan Whitman, is initially concerned only with protecting his wife and daughter, but is gradually drawn further into the broader conflict over the course of events. And it says:

 

“It is brought about by the rise of a new third party who enter government and combat a massive influx in African refugees, which have been allied in part by the principal opposition faction known as the Secessionist, culminating into a multiple party conflict.”

 

So, yeah, that would be very, very interesting. And obviously it’s by an English writer.

 

So, yeah, would absolutely review this. Obviously, we probably [words unclear] next month. Because it would be like two books that are identical back to back. But, yeah, and the author is still alive. He’s 79. So maybe we could wrangle it and get him on the show? But that sounds very interesting. Have we lost Natty? We’ve lost Natty. He said he was having troubles.

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, he’s gone.

 

Mark Collett: He’ll be fine. And we got another question. This is from Jack Bevan. He said, :

 

“Would you be interested in reviewing Liberalism Unmasked by Richard Houk? He’s a writer for Counter-Currents?”

 

Yeah, well, look, anyone from Counter-Currents is welcome to come on. Richard Houk, if you’re reading this, or if anyone can get him to email us, would happily review his book, he’d be more than welcome to come on the show. So the answer to that is, absolutely! We certainly would review your book, my friend. So, yes.

 

As I say, Natty is still gone. And we’re getting to the point of the night where we’re about to wrap up. So that is very unfortunate, because we certainly want his wise words on the roundup at the end.

 

So, yeah, we’ll discuss a few other things and hopefully he will be back in the next couple of minutes. He’s probably rebooting his computer as we speak. Computers are obviously a bit of a pain in the butt and can be very irritating.

 

But, yeah, I want to say just a couple of final things about this. I just think it’s quite poetic, really, that we’re reviewing this book tonight, especially considering the protests that I’ve been at over the last few weekends. I think that everything that Jean Raspail said, other than them coming from India was largely-oh he’s back!-was largely correct. And I do think it makes for a very entertaining book. Natty, can you hear us? Can you hear me?

 

Natty: Can you guys hear me?

 

Mark Collett: You’re back. We’ve got a $5 Superchat. Somebody saying:

 

“Would we ever review two of the books written by William Pierce?”

 

No, we absolutely wouldn’t! I don’t recommend anybody in Britain seek out the books of William Pierce. I’m not saying the guy was a bad man. He did some excellent work. But some of his books are likely to be the kind of book that could get you into some trouble. And we certainly wouldn’t recommend that you read, or seek out any texts that could get you into bother. And we certainly do not endorse any form of violent direct action, or anything that could lead to any individual who is interested in nationalism getting into trouble.

 

We believe that the only way is peaceful, Democratic community building. And that is what we’re investing in. As I said, I think Dr William Pierce did some very good work throughout his life. But some of his books could well be books that are on that secret government banned list, which is enforced in a very unfair way. What I mean, by that is you can go to Waterstones, or WH Smith and buy certain books. And if you’re an anarchist, or a Leftist, there’s nothing wrong with that.

 

But if you happen to be a nationalist and you pick up those books, you will be arrested. And people have gone to jail for owning them. So there is definitely selective enforcement of the law there. So if you’re basically an Antifa terrorist, you can own those books.

 

[1:45:45]

 

But if you are a nationalist who might be curious about what’s in those books, you could get arrested. So what I’m saying is. You need to be very, very careful what you do. And we want to channel all of our energies into things that are legal, above board and are based around building communities and changing the political landscape. So we absolutely don’t endorse those books.

 

Anyway, what we should do is now head towards wrapping up this show. I think it’s been a very good show tonight. And we started a few minutes late. I’m sure everyone wants to get off at around 09:00, because it’s Sunday night.

 

So Aunt Sally is now the first one on my panel. So, Aunt Sally, do you want to give your final thoughts on this book. And whether you recommend it? I think it’s going to be pretty scathing.

 

Aunt Sally: .. I think it’s very much a man’s book. It’s not my cup of tea. I really didn’t like it. Almost traumatized by it. It’s horrible! But there are some very interesting lessons to be learnt, or to be had from it. So it’s not a bad book, it’s just really just not my thing at all. Yeah, but everyone else seems to rave about it. You both liked it, I think. But I’m a woman and I’m playing the girl card. It’s not for me. It’s nothing in it that, … Politics bore the hell out of me anyway.

 

But the interesting parts are the way that the liberals acted. And I thought, then how did he know that’s how they would act all the way back then? It’s worth a read if it’s your cup of tea. It’s not mine. Sorry. Anyway, I’ll pop it back.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much Aunt Sally. I’m sorry you didn’t enjoy the book. And obviously we don’t try to foist books upon you that you don’t enjoy. But, yeah, not every book is going to be for every man, or every woman.

 

So, Natty, I think your take is going to be slightly different to Aunt Sally’s. Do you recommend this book? Did you enjoy it? What’s your final thoughts, my friend?

 

Natty: Yeah, definitely. Not only is it an enjoyable book. Again it’s one of those books that’s quite important for it’s time. I’ll tell you what, on a personal level as well, it’s written a little bit like Starship Troopers and the way Robert Heinlein wrote in that there’s kind of political ideas and political essays coming out of some of the mouths of the characters in what is a novel form, which I really enjoy…

 

I think it’s quite easy when you have a book, a non-fiction book, it can get a bit dry and stale. But if you have political ideas coming out of the mouths of characters who are also taking certain actions, whether it’s going to war, or defending borders, or whatever they’re doing, it makes it much more interesting.

 

So there’s a lot of that in this book.

 

So, yeah, definitely. Highly recommended! Highly recommended!

 

Mark Collett: Okay, well, I’ll give you my final thoughts. I like this book, and I liked it for a few reasons. I liked it because it was very much a story told on a macro level that dived into a few different individuals and showed their story, but without really focusing. There wasn’t sort of one hero, or one central character. And I think that’s a very bold move! I think that’s a very difficult kind of book to write and to make it compelling. But it’s something I like.

 

I always really enjoy the beginning of zombie films where you start to see the crumbling of society and the zombie sort of taking over. And I tend to not enjoy the second half of those films where it just becomes the same well trodden heroes journey of five people fighting their way out of a shopping centre, or making their way to an airport to refit the last helicopter that can fly out of there and escape.

 

I like seeing how everything changes and society collapses. And I like actually watching that take place, or I’ve always wanted to watch that take place over the entire course of the film. But you never get this.

 

[1:50:02]

 

And I felt this book was really bold in the it showed you everything on a macro level. And it also wrote things from a certain perspective where you felt this impending doom. And as a reader, you’re constantly hoping that something was going to change. You were constantly thinking:

 

“Oh my gosh, can this be stopped?”

 

And it doesn’t! Which leads to quite a shocking ending, an ending that sort of gives you a slap around the face with a wet fish.

 

And that’s a good thing as well, because this author, he wrote things in a different way and he made you think about things. And there’s so much of it that’s prophetic. There’s so much of it which sort of draws on history, like the Haitian revolution.

 

And so much of it is relevant to the current struggle that we are engaged in. So much of that book can be applied to what’s happening today. And obviously so much so, that it has influenced people like Steve Bannon, who was really the mastermind behind Trump’s successful 2016 run.

 

So I definitely recommend picking this up. There’s a link in the description below to a copy on Archive.org, which is free. There is the full PDF that can be downloaded from my Telegram. And there’s also the audio book in several parts that can be downloaded from my Telegram. Obviously, they’re all free. So please do feel that you can go and get this book and enjoy it.

 

And obviously, if you want a physical copy in English, Claymore Books do have one coming out. But at the moment, physical copies in English are very rare and do fetch well over £100 per copy. I mean, I’ve seen them go for over 200. So that’s quite a lot for a book.

 

But it is obviously highly sought after, because it is one of those books you could say is a formative read. It’s something that helps people form their opinions and solidify their work, solidifies their worldview. And it does it all, probably with a little bit of Sci-Fi, with a little bit of that dystopian future. Which I do think Sally is very right when she says it’s certainly more of a male book than it is a female book.

 

So maybe if you are a female, you wouldn’t enjoy this as much. But considering it’s free and considering it’s available in audio format, I definitely do believe that this could be something that you may well enjoy. And as it’s free, I suggest giving it a whirl.

 

So, yeah, that’s my thoughts. And obviously everyone’s giving their thoughts. So that comes to the end of the stream. Obviously the stream has been slightly shorter tonight, because we’re having a couple of technical issues getting started. But I hope you’ve enjoyed it all the same. It’s only about five minutes shorter than usual anyway. So I think we’ve managed to wrap up just in time.

 

So I will be back next week. On Wednesday. We’ve got two guests on Patriotic Weekly Review. It’s going to be Laura Tower and Emily Yukis. It’s going to be a bit of a woman’s hour. So they will be doing what women do best, which is chat a lot. And you can obviously join them. And you can ask them your questions.

 

We should also be back next Friday night for a big stream. It’s going to be our monthly roundup stream and obviously if you’ve been living under a rock, you’ll have missed the fact that Patriotic Alternative have had probably one of their biggest ever months. It’s been a month to remember.

 

We’ve had several demos, which would be massive. I’ve spoken at two separate massive anti-immigrant demos, both of them with well over 100 people there. About 115 in Leeds, about 200 to 215 in Hull. So that’s been a busy month. So you can have the full round up there.

 

And Laura and Sam will be back tomorrow night with Teatime with Sam and Laura. So you can check that out too. And obviously we will be back at the end of next month for another edition of Book Club. And I’m talking to an author who’s contacted me through Twitter, who wants to send me and the guys here a copy of his book.

 

And next month we will be joined by another reviewer as well, a guy called Bill Aithling from Wales who is a PA activist. So we’re going to get the numbers back up to four reviewers. I hope you’ll all be looking forward to that. Anyway, everyone, if you can, please give you goodbyes and say good night and we’ll wrap things up.

 

Aunt Sally: Goodbye, everyone. Thanks for listening.

 

Natty: See you later, guys. See you next month. Look forward to whatever book comes down the pipe. Have a good evening.