Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and welcome to tonight’s Book Review. We are here tonight with Student X to review his book, Equal Training. And we are live tonight on Odysee, DLive and Rumble. The usual platforms. We’re also live on Entropy. If you can share this stream, that will be very, very much appreciated.

 

Obviously, I’m expecting there to be a bit of a hit in numbers tonight. I’m not expecting this to be the usual book review because sadly, the football is on, so unfortunately, what can you say? It’s gone into extra time. The very multicultural England team are taking on the very homogenous Slovakia. And I’m sure that many people are tuning into that.

 

But if you can help us get a few viewers in, as I say, we’re not expecting the usual numbers, but we shall soldier on regardless and hopefully a few people will pick it up on replay. So England are now winning two one as well.

 

Anyway, let’s get straight into things. Oh, by the way, we’re going to do the new usual format.

 

So if you like the book review, if you like what we do, please do send a Superchat. You can Superchat via Odysee or Entropy.

 

So let’s get into this and we’ll start by introducing our special guest, Student X.

 

Now, he’s written a book, it’s a different book to the sort of books we usually review. It’s more in line, I would say, with a textbook, sort of a self help textbook, which is aimed at students.

 

But I’m not going to say anything more than that. Let’s let him speak for himself. Student X, this is the first time we’ve worked with you. Do you want to tell us a bit about yourself, your personal journey, then describe the book and why you wrote it, before we get into things.

 

Student X: Yeah.

 

First of all, thanks for having me on. It’s a pleasure to be here with all of you. So, for me personally, background, I was born and raised in southern California, also called North Mexico, jokingly. And this journey kind of started out before I ever had a social media account or any online footprint. And I didn’t know that there was a broader, White positive community out there.

 

So a lot of this was done just from my own personal point of view, thinking, what’s the best impact I can have just as one person and what can I do? Right?

 

So basically, I graduated high school. My main focus was working. You know, I started working as soon as I could. And after I secured a pretty good job that would pay the rent and I had enough free time, I then said:

 

“Hey maybe I should go back and finish my degree.”

 

So I would try to attend evening or weekend classes at the local community college. And I was quite shocked by the type of material that I was encountering in there.

 

So at the time, I was pretty good at navigating bureaucracy and stuff. I had been working for large companies for a while now, and I thought:

 

“I’m going to file a formal complaint, and I’m going to go through their process and kind of see what comes of it.”

 

So I did that.

 

I would say off and on while attending classes, this probably ranged from about 2012 through 2015. Around that timeframe. I spoke with all top officials at the school location that I was going to. I escalated things to the state level Chancellor’s office. I spoke with the AA UP, which is the American Association of University Professors, and I wound up back at the school speaking with their attorney, trying to make sense of, you know what are the rules that you operate by, basically.

 

So what I encountered through this journey was a lot of gate-keeping. All these different levels of bureaucracy, they’re selective about who they enforce the laws on behalf of and who they don’t. A lot of times they operate by unpublished criteria or resort to using undefined terms. So after I go through this whole exercise, and it became apparent to me that they’re clearly stonewalling me and they’re using this giant barrier and this bureaucracy to avoid being held accountable.

 

So I’m going through this thinking:

 

“Okay, so this is clearly intentional. They’ve got some kind of agreement going on.”

 

So I thought:

 

“How can I bypass this gate-keeping? Like, how can I work around all this?”

 

And I was also thinking from the point of, I’m just one person. I have no network. You know, my demographic maybe was around 5% of the total school demographic, and those include people going during the day, which I don’t even see or interact with. So I truly felt really alone!

 

And I thought:

 

“Okay, what are my options? What can I do to kind of disrupt all this stuff? How do I work around the gate-keeping and the people who deflect and all that stuff?”

 

So I thought, if they use the literature and the academic material as a means of putting our population on trial publicly, then my strategy was going to be to draught the criteria and the terminology that can be used to put their literature on trial publicly along with its author. You know, the thought process is I don’t control that narrative. I’m not really giving a say, which stories or collection of narratives that get picked.

 

So that’s already in place. But what I can do is expose the tactics that are being used and try to cause them to backfire, and incriminate the people who use them. Right?

 

Around this time personal and work life got really, really hectic. I actually had to stop going to classes and pivot and focus on work.

 

[06:40]

 

And I remember coming across a story of a young boy who is about nine years old, and I think his name was Aaron Dugmore, and it says that:

 

“He was bullied for being White at school and he wound up taking his own life.”

 

And that’s something that stuck with me and really haunted me. So that stayed with me. And regardless of how busy life got or when I did or did not have time, I made a personal commitment, …

 

Mark Collett: Just to interject. That’s a UK case, isn’t it?

 

Student X: That is, yeah, I believe it was out of Birmingham, …

 

But that really solidified the commitment inside of me, Mark, that said:

 

“I have to do this or else it’s going to haunt me all the way to the grave!”

 

So this is something that’s for all of us world-wide. This is not just for me to say:

 

“Hey, I’m an author or whatever.”

 

Right? This is to begin the process of actually busting up that media cache and surgically taking it apart.

 

And that’s how my work is designed to operate.

 

Natty: And just a quick question. This was one institution, or did this start in one institution or., ….

 

And then you kind of played it out in local government or the local education body?

 

Student X: Yeah, good question.

 

So I was working full-time during the day. And at the time, the only option for me to attend college courses was at my local community college, and it was on nights or evenings and weekends. So I was going through classes in the evening and weekend and I was encountering this kind of stuff, and I just thought:

 

“Hey, this is something that should be confronted!”

 

So I took it upon myself to draught a formal complaint that I sent to Academic Affairs. I copied the Dean on there as well. So in addition to taking night and weekend classes while working full-time during the day, periodically I would have in person meetings with that Dean or members of Academic Affairs or whatnot. And it’s kind of sprinkled in wherever they could fit on the schedule.

 

So that’s what happened at that specific location.

 

And then when I was not getting what I wanted, when they were not being cooperative with me, I looked to higher levels that I could escalate. So that went to the state level Chancellor’s office. In California, they have a state level office for Chancellors. I then went to outside institutions like the AA UP, which is An Association of University Professors. And they pride themselves on “academic freedom” and “freedom of speech” and things like that. So it actually started local, but I went to, I basically exhausted the whole bureaucracy to say:

 

“Okay, I’ll go through this whole process!”

 

Because it felt like they were trying to exhaust me, so I quit.

 

And I’m not that kind of person. I’m like:

 

“Okay, you want to take the long way? We’re going to go the long way!”

 

So I kept notes, I kept all my emails. I kept all my communications, to this day. It’s all there. I have all the receipts for it, just so I can go back in the end and say:

 

“Hey, you gave me wrong information six months ago! You sent me down the wrong path six months ago. You said X, Y and Z.”

 

So that was the purpose of me co-operating and going through all that so I could really remove all of their excuses.

 

Natty: And to be clear, when you started this process, you weren’t ideological. You’d just seen some of this stuff and it was starting to weigh on your mind. And did you have any expectation that the process would actually work, or did you go into it knowing, kind of having some expectation that you were going to be stonewalled and you were going to get sent around the houses?

 

Student X: Well, I mean, I was already somewhat aware simply because of the location I grew up. Right.

 

So when I went to high school and stuff like that, there was like a lot of gangsters there from each population. I already knew that just from personal experience. The piece that got to me is, why are the teachers chiming in? Why are the teachers going on with this and doing it? Why is the administration and the faculty entertaining this? My thought process was:

 

“Hey, if you’re an employee, if you’re on payroll at this school, you have behaviour requirements that you have to meet as an employee. This piece shouldn’t be optional for you to go along with.”

 

Like, I expect it from the student body, but not from the people who are supposed to be the working professionals.

 

So that’s the piece that caught me by surprise. And that’s the piece that said:

 

“Hey, I’m going to bypass arguing with students and everyone else.”

 

I’m just going to go directly to the administration and say:

 

“Hey, what are the rules that you’re supposed to be operating by? Let me see those. I want to review those.”

 

And that was really the path I took.

 

Natty: And just one more question before we get into the kind of, the content of the book. You, in the first few chapters, you outlined that you didn’t have a lot of money growing up. Your family didn’t have a lot of money growing up, so you were kind of working class.

 

I mean, I know we’re in the UK, it’s a little bit different, but there are ways, if families have enough money, but they can avoid kind of racial schools and go to homogenous schools, whether, you know, White schools where the kids are well behaved. You didn’t have that option, presumably.

 

Student X: No.

 

Natty: And it’s very, it’s all very well to say:

 

“Oh, well, you shouldn’t have gone to that school!”

 

[12:12]

 

Student X: And, well, to clarify on that, though. My grandparents raised me. I was taken, … They took me into their custody. I think I was around one or two years old. I was very young. Simply because my parents were not fit for it, right? And in the area I grew up in, the only other White families were that generation of grandparents that was left. Everything else that had moved in was from different populations. So there may be like four or five other sets of grandparents in that whole community.

 

And this kind of just grew up around them. You know, they bought that house 40 or 50 years prior, and then it got socially engineered into a pretty ghetto atmosphere. But you also have generational differences too, because my grandparents generation were big on manners. They were big on like:

 

“Hey, if you mouth off, you deserve a fat lip!”

 

You know, they just handled things differently. And they wouldn’t understand if they were to encounter somebody behaving all nasty like these anti-Whites do, they would think:

 

“Oh, that’s just one person. Maybe they’ll work out of their system. Maybe it’ll stop one day.”

 

They don’t know that this is actually receiving government funding and academic support, and people are making careers out of this, and it’s not gonna go away!

 

So that’s not really something, … It’s hard to communicate something like that to someone in their generation. Because they don’t understand the reason why people want to engineer conflict like that, you know?

 

But going back to what you said, it was working class, they were older, they were fixed income. I didn’t want to request money or anything like that from them. I didn’t want to, like, burden them. I was kind of born into this. I grew up with it from grade school to high school. Started working on my own, and really just became independent and kind of just left without saying anything, you know, as far as the reasons why. And I just kind of operated independently. But it would not have been an option to relocate and go to different schools because any of the surrounding cities around mine, they’re all pretty similar in demographics, so, …

 

Natty: Sure. And before I hand it back to Mark, I will say this. What you’ve just said hearkens back to something that we talked about a few years ago, where it’s all very well running away and trying to find schools that are well behaved and homogenous and are White, but eventually the barrier to that gets more and more expensive.

 

So you have to be more and more wealthy to be able to afford that. And even if you can there are some people who don’t even know that’s an option, and working class kids who go to comprehensives. And this is true from what you’re saying. This is true in the United States. It’s certainly true in this country cwhere there are certain schools that are totally just non-White, 90% ethnic minority. And you can say that:

 

“Well, the schools enforce behavioural codes.”

 

And all the rest of it.

 

Now, this book exposes that that isn’t the case! But it’s also the case that kids are ruthless and will pick on differences.

 

When I was a kid growing up, it would be the slightly tubby kid or the kid with ginger hair or whatever.

 

But you can imagine a few White kids in a school full of blacks or Asians [Pakistanis, etc.] or anything like that, they’re going to have a really tough time of it. And the Aaron Dugmore case just exemplifies that.

 

So I think this book is very important.

 

But let’s get into it. I’ll hand it back to Mark on that one.

 

Student X: One thing I would add, though, is where I was at, they had what’s called “Busing”. So they would literally bus kids in from other cities to that specific school to meet quotas.

 

I don’t know if you guys have ever heard of those, you know, nineties rappers, like gangster rappers who talk about the city of Compton. People were bused from that specific city to the high school I went to!

 

Natty: That’s, uh. That’s pretty crazy!

 

Student X: Yeah.

 

Natty: And it’s like the schools require a certain amount of minority students in order to claim funding.

 

So they’re more, …

 

Student X: Federal funding. Yeah, yeah. And they create all sorts of false excuses like:

 

“Oh, the schools in their area are overwhelmed, so we need to offload to a different school or whatever.”

 

So it truly, even if I were to try to evade this and go to a different location, it’s impossible with busing and all the other quotas that are put in place.

 

Mark Collett: So obviously, this isn’t necessarily about the book, but I’m really interested in what you’re saying.

 

So when you go into one of these multiracial American schools, I’m obviously aware of busing and that this was a treacherous policy put in place by the American government to, basically integrate via the gun, because people were forced at bayonet point to go to these schools! I’ve seen the pictures of the National Guard literally forcing White children or White teens to go to these multiracial schools. It’s quite sickening! It’s absolutely horrendous!

 

 

 

Now here’s the interesting thing, or the thing that I’d like to get to here, or the topic that I want to sort of discuss. When these blacks, because you’re talking about ones like, gangster rapper types and they’re obviously black the ones from Compton, you know, that you mentioned earlier, they’re obviously being bussed into these schools, but what are they actually like? Do they stick together when they get to your schools? Are they basically acting as one homogeneous group or is there any attempt whatsoever for any form of integration? Or is that just doesn’t happen?

 

[18:21]

 

 

Student X: Well, I mean, if you’re asking like, hey, during lunch, does everybody group up and sit in their own space? I would say yes, for the most part.

 

Mark Collett: When you say “group up”? So when they meet blacks, …

 

Student X: Yeah, totally. Same way you see it go down in the jails, that’s kind of the same way it goes down [chuckling] in these high schools. And then as far, …

 

Mark Collett: Then there is racial segregation still then? But the racial segregation, rather than being segregated by school, you’re all in the same sort of, you’re all thrown in the same area, but they segregate in a different way, if you like.

 

So there is the segregation. There are the battle lines drawn. But rather than the segregation being in different buildings in different cities, the segregation takes place in one building in the same city. And I guess that leads to tension, does it not?

 

Student X: Well, I mean, everyone’s got their own lunch table in the cafeteria, so to speak. Right.

 

And a lot of times people they try to avoid conflict for the most part. In California, it’s well known people just don’t even make eye contact, and they don’t even say anything when they walk by each other. That’s just the norm. That’s kind of how I grew up. If you don’t know them, don’t, … You have nothing to gain by interacting with a complete stranger because it can just go to so many different directions. And then sometimes you would see the normal beefs between guys over girls or whatever, and sometimes it would cross certain lines. It would be one guy from this group and one guy from another group.

 

And then you have the few strays that go outside of their group and talk and mingle with others or whatnot. So.

 

But for the most part, if they don’t have us under forced interaction policies, we all tend to keep to our own. It’s just the best way to avoid conflict.

 

Natty: You know, funnily enough, there was a story that emerged recently, in the past month or so about Britain’s strictest head headmaster. And it’s an Indian or Pakistani lady. And she runs a school called Makayla Community School, and she’s been lauded as this new pioneer of education. This school has all different students, all different ethnicities. It has Muslims, it has Christians, it has, you know, Africans, Middle Easterners, all of these kids.

 

And on the surface, and they have lots of visitors who visit this school to see this model, exemplary school that really works. And the kids are well behaved and they get on with their work. But they have to treat them like prisoners. And they have some of the craziest rules where they not allowed to hold anything in their hands. They’re not allowed to look around. The parents who send their kids to these schools agree that there’s the detentions that they can be put under and they can be kept behind the school and all this stuff.

 

So for this multiracial, multicultural, [chuckling] utopian school idea to work, they basically have to treat these kids like they’re in some sort of forced labour camp! And it just puts a lie to all of this idea that it can work and it can be successful.

 

Student X: Yeah. You know, I remember being excited about graduating from grade school and going to high school. I was like:

 

“Wow! You know, you’re growing up!”

 

You’re like, you think:

 

“I get to have a locker now? I get to have stuff like that?”

 

Nope! They took the lockers out. My 7th grade year was the only year I had one. After that, they removed them over the summer. They put in just random checkpoints. There was a constant., … We used to call them “narcs”. They were just security, you know, that would be riding bikes around or walking the campus at all times. There was anywhere from, like six to ten of those. And they would have a wand on them if they wanted to search you, or they could just take you to the main office and say:

 

“Hey, we’re going to go through your backpack or whatever, because we heard X, Y and Z.”

 

So in reality, you are operating kind of like a captured population. And they have to put all those controls in there to kind of to force these interactions against free people, basically.

 

Natty: Yeah. One of the things that came out of this documentary about Britain’s strictest head headmaster was the kids would constantly have their things searched. And when [chuckling] they’re asked by this, the documentary maker, the kids are saying:

 

“Oh, they’re making sure we don’t have chewing gum and sweet wrappers and stuff.”

 

And it’s like:

 

“No, no! They’re making sure there’s not knives and switch blades in them.”

 

Student X: Yeah:

 

“Which one of you is selling drugs?”

 

That’s what they’re looking for.

 

Natty: Yeah, yeah. Exactly!

 

Mark Collett: Sally has now rejoined us. Sally, can you hear us?

 

Aunt Sally: Yes, I can. Yes, I can hear you. And can you hear me?

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, you’re clear and fluid. Would you like to give your., … I don’t know if you’ve heard anything of what we’ve been saying or if you’d like to join in, but it’s good to have you here and it’s good to have you on a proper connection. My blood pressure is now falling.

 

Aunt Sally: He said his blood pressure is falling. It’s great! Yeah, no, I have heard, because I’ve been listening on my old laptop, but this wouldn’t work tonight.

 

But, yeah, I have heard. No, and I like what you’re saying, so, yeah, I’ll say what I think of the book at the end. It’s great! It’s great! I just need to check my notes now and see what questions I had for him. So you just carry on, please.

 

[23:45]

 

Mark Collett: Yeah. Okay.

 

One thing I will say about the American school system is when you see it from the outside looking in, you see it in movies and TV shows, they do touch on this sort of segregation. Were the schools you’re in, …. And this is the last question I ask. Were there metal detectors when you went in? And how regularly are there serious outbreaks of violence that either end with stabbings, shootings? Did those things happen? Were those regular occurrences? And how does being involved in that kind of very tense standoff, almost like a war zone, if you like, on a day to day basis, how does that affect White children? I mean, that’s a number one sort of priority here, isn’t it? How does this affect our people? What would you say? What would the long term mental stresses be on young White people in these institutions?

 

Student X: Oh, that’s a big question!

 

As far as metal detectors. You know, back when I was going to high school there, they didn’t have the doorway style ones that you had to walk through, but they did carry the wands on them. The narcs or security guards, they had those, and they could use you know, randomly or spontaneously if they wanted to. So it was really up to their discretion.

 

And as far as education, you know, education comes secondary to survival in that type of environment.

 

So really you’re not absorbing a lot of the subjects and stuff that you’re supposed to be. What you’re mainly looking out for is avoiding conflict, things like that.

 

I would say as far as fights, breaking out, physical fights. Yeah, you’d probably get one like every, you know, three, four weeks somewhere randomly on the campus, and the narcs would come and break it up like that. Don’t remember any shootings or anything like that when I was attending there, although it’s quite possible it’s just nobody did.

 

But I do remember that one time there was a pretty nasty attack where people, you know, resorted to using baseball bats out towards the sports field, which is just not good. But, yeah, that’s kind of the environment.

 

Education becomes secondary to the social engineering that they’re forcing on you, basically.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, so, … Go on Natty.

 

Natty: So I’ll just cap that off by saying that’s interesting, because secondary school, for a lot of people, I think, is where they become socialised and learn how to deal with groups and how to interact with other people properly without the kind of oversight that you get in primary education. I’m not sure how that breaks down on the American level. But like you said, group dynamics the social side of things, totally take over for a lot of people and become, like you said, become secondary to, like, academic studies.

 

So that’s very interesting that you’ve come to that conclusion as well.

 

Student X: Yeah, I mean, ideally, you’re just hoping not to get jumped when you’re walking home. And you’re hoping not to have your bike stolen from the bike rack or stuff like that.

 

Mark Collett: Can I just ask one last. This is another tangential question before we get really into the book, and I know we’ve been half an hour just discussing the sort of school system, but this is really interesting.

 

So how come more, I might be missing something here, but how come more White Americans obviously aren’t racially, ….

 

So one of the arguments that’s made in the UK, and this is, I think, you know, Natty, if I’m saying something wrong here, Natty, just let me know whether you agree with this.

 

One of the problems in the UK that we always hear is that things aren’t bad enough yet, that basically, here in the UK, things haven’t got to that awful point yet. Where people are fighting for their life, begging for scraps of food, and as such, unfortunately, people don’t accept there are problems because life is just too good.

 

But it seems to me that these young White Americans are growing up in pretty much a living hell in sort of this racially charged almost war zone in what should be a educational institution. How come more young Whites, or how come so many young Whites are still drinking the Kool Aid*, so to speak?

 

[* “Drinking the Kool-Aid” is most strongly believing in and accepting a deadly, deranged, or foolish ideology or concept based only upon the overpowering coaxing of another; the expression is also used to refer to a person who wrongly has faith in a possibly doomed or dangerous idea because of perceived potential high rewards. The phrase typically carries a negative connotation. It can also be used ironically or humourously to refer to accepting an idea or changing a preference due to popularity, peer pressure, or persuasion. In recent years, it has evolved further to mean extreme dedication to a cause or purpose, so extreme that one would “drink the Kool-Aid” and die for the cause.
While use of the phrase dates back to 1968 with the nonfiction book The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test, [citation needed] it is strongly associated with the events in Jonestown, Guyana, on November 18, 1978, in which over 900 members of the Peoples Temple movement died. The movement’s leader, Jim Jones, called a mass meeting at the Jonestown pavilion after the murder of U.S. Congressman Leo Ryan and others in nearby Port Kaituma. Jones proposed “revolutionary suicide” by way of ingesting a powdered drink mix made from Flavor Aid (later misidentified as Kool-Aid) that was lethally laced with cyanide and other drugs.]

 

Student X: Well, regarding the argument of its just not bad enough yet, I remember hearing that years back and I kind of view that like a dismissive argument. Somebody who’s just being dismissive and not actually confronting things, because once they admit to things being bad enough, there’s not going to be much of a White population left to fight back. Right?

 

So to me, it’s kind of like:

 

“Oh, you know, eventually everyone will rise up and we’ll get someone to save the day.”

 

I don’t see that happening.

 

As far as networking on this particular subject. You know, Whites have been conditioned to pretty much accept what’s dictated to them and not speak up for their own interests and not organised based on their own interests. In addition to that, and I’m seeing this in the UK from afar as well now, because I know the tactics, I’m familiar with them at the institutional level. You know, the institutions are told:

 

“You only enforce the laws on behalf of minorities!”

 

That’s it!

 

“If Whites want to enforce the laws, it’s up to them to do on their own. Right? And stay quiet about this. Do not admit that you’re operating this way. Keep it a secret!”

 

So that’s where we’ve run into the gate-keeping and the stuff like that. So even if Whites want, let’s say, parents wanted to speak up to, who can they tell? You know, the institution won’t do anything. The police are ordered to stand down. The media, the mainstream media is controlled, and they won’t report it.

 

So, I mean, they can maybe tell the person standing next to them who already knows. Right? But there has been, somebody has disrupted our abilities to communicate. Kind of like they do at the military level when they’re going against other countries. They cut out their communications. They do certain things. Those are the tactics that have been used on our population.

 

And if you do ever get up to a media platform or anything like that, you’re going to have one of these radicals that are there to sabotage you and smear you and just call you all kinds of dirty names and stuff, and really derail your true purpose.

 

[30:19]

 

 

Following Transcript Quality = 3.5 Stars

1 Star — Poor quality with many errors, contains nonsense text 2 Stars — Low quality with many errors, some nonsense text. 3 Stars — Medium quality with some errors. 4 Stars — Good quality with only a few errors. 5 Stars — High quality with few to no errors.

NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section. Thanks.

 

 

Mark Collett: So all of this, then, was a inspiration for you writing your book. And your book, as I said, it’s quite different from things that we’ve had in the past because I would say that I don’t want to put people off buying it. That’s the thing. But this book has got more of a specific purpose than probably any other book that we’ve reviewed. It’s almost, if you like, if you’re reading a book on gardening the book has very little use if you’re living in a one bedroom flat, you know, four stories up, and you’re in the concrete jungle. And this book has a very specific use for a specific group of people. This is pretty much a textbook, if you like, but a self help textbook to help White students within these institutions. I would say not just to fight back, but both to understand what’s going on and to help orientate these students in some way so that there could be some fight back. Would you agree with that?

 

Student X: Yes. Think of this like a training manual. I already know that White students are being sent into an environment that’s hostile to them. I’m trying to give them the information and the language they need, not only to bob and weave as they go through it, but to actively de-weaponise that public school curriculum and defend themselves and be able to stand their ground on site in front of the teachers, in front of anybody else who starts using these hostile terms and things like that.

 

Mark Collett: Now, my first question is about the book in that thing, then I’ll let everyone go around the group. And this is really a major question. What would you say? Because it’s more of a potential criticism, but what would you say to people who, because a lot of this is, and I noticed its how to argue back, it’s how to use language, it’s how to frame things in a way that should be able to help people who are disenfranchised and angry with the system to get their point over. What would you say to the argument of, it’s better just to keep your head down, acknowledge the problem, get your diploma degree, whatever, get the hell out of there, and make sure you move to a White area before you have kids so your kids don’t have to go through this. What would be your answer to people who said:

 

“You know, fighting it in a university, or a college is fruitless.”

 

Student X: There’s nowhere to run this specific agenda. Once I’ve mapped out the tactics the way that I have, and I took a long time to map these out, just so you know, there’s a lot of strategy that went into it.

 

I started working backwards on the timeline saying, have I seen this used in other countries? And the answer is 100% yes. And it ran me back to a country that was called Rhodesia, something that was never taught to us here in American public schools.

 

But when I start pulling a lot of the scripting and the verbiage that was used on public platforms to kind of whip the populations up into a frenzy and get them to annihilate the White population there, that same canned language is here in America. It made its way here, and now I see it being used in the UK and even in Ireland, the laws are being changed the same way so that the government institutions only have a legal obligation to enforce the law on behalf of non-White populations, both that are here and that will be installed in the future, there is nowhere for you to go. I’ve already seen the articles, the random articles of, oh, the countryside is too White here in England, or just random stuff like that, when you say:

 

“Oh, well, I’ll just get my degree and move to a White area.”

 

Well, within your lifetime, long before you’re even going to retire, this will be brought to your doorstep courtesy of the people behind it. So that said, that’s not an option, in my view. I understand people want to avoid conflict, and that’s one of the elements I built into this book is dissent. The power of dissent. That is something that we can use immediately and we can use without getting in trouble. That’s the best and most effective way you can avoid conflict in this situation. But you are going to have to stand your ground. Your own institutions are being turned against you, the same way they have in America, same way they did in South Africa and what they originally did in Rhodesia.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, well, let’s let Natty and Aunt Sally bring up some stuff and make their points. You go first, Natty, and then we’ll go over to Aunt Sally.

 

Natty: So, getting into the meat of the book, I don’t think we’re going to have time to go through all of the all of the chapters and the sub chapters.

 

However, the first bit you get into is group blame, using colour. And you talk about the way that the word White is used versus the way that brown or yellow or, I can’t remember, black is not used, and how media reports and celebrities and politicians will use the word White.

 

Now, I guess I’d like you just to talk about that briefly, but I also wanted to ask you a question in that. Do you think that us as White identitarians, White nationalists, nationalists, whatever, however you want to term Us dissidents, have made a mistake in owning the term White when we refer to ourselves?

 

Student X: Yeah, good question. First off, the term White does have its proper uses among us. I believe all of us are. That is an umbrella term. Right. And within that umbrella, there are multiple different subgroups. Later on in that book I talk about, I prefer to use the term White ethnics. I like that because it both acknowledges our shared heritage, but also does not diminish or erase our different cultures and things that we have branched off to become. Right.

 

So in that respect, I like that.

 

Natty: Talk about that. Talk about that for a second, because when I heard that, I was a bit sceptical, because using a term like that, we’re trying to force a sea change or changing people’s opinion. You’re going up against a lot of pre-established ideas and ideology to.

 

Student X: I understand it’s very controversial.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah.

 

Natty: Add the word ethnic to a term that we use for ourselves, which is White, and ethnics is a term used to describe the other, especially in Western countries undergoing this change.

 

Student X: Yeah.

 

So let me first preface this by saying the first chapter took me the longest to write out of everything, out of any other chapter by far, because trying to convey that in a way that’s not confusing or to getting off into the weeds, so to speak, it took a while for me to really just be content with the way I wanted to write that out and convey to the reader, understand it this way.

 

Okay, so the first chapter even. Well, let me say this. White is one word. Yes.

 

However, there can be multiple different uses and meanings for this one word. So one way is to refer to people’s colour or their visual appearance. Right. You’re a White person, you’re a brown person, so on. That’s when you refer to people by what colour they are the second and the different way to use it is in the context of race. Right. So in America, our official census has a racial category of White, and that defines anyone from North Africa, the Middle East, the semitic populations, the original peoples of Europe, Hispanic and Latino, all fit into that White category. Right.

 

Natty: And this is the reason why the term Caucasian has very, very rapidly just completely disappeared from the lexicon. Right.

 

Student X: It’s possible. I didn’t really focus on that term, to be honest with you. I’m focusing on the way that they weaponise the word White and they vandalise it, and they maximize the amount of times they can use it in a negative way. So all within one piece of literature, you can see the word White used by its author, but they might be using it in the context of colour or flipping over to use it in the context of race. So they can maximize the amount of times they get to use the word White in a derogatory way and really install that into the mind of the general population or the kids in the schools. Right. And which leads into chapter three. So chapter one is colour.

 

Chapter two is race. It explains the difference between the way the word White can be used in these two contexts. And chapter three says, okay, now that you understand these differences, let’s analyze what you see in your school literature. Let’s analyze what you see in the media reporting. So, as an example, in America, when somebody is Hispanic or Latino, North African, semitic, or any of the other subgroups in there, when they commit a crime, since crimes are recorded by race, the blame gets shifted to White. That’s the official descriptor. These people are considered White when they commit crimes. There’s this giant criminal record that’s been exaggerated, and blame has been shifted over to our demographic for things that were actually not done by our demographic. These were done by other subgroups or members of special treatment groups or the special treatment class.

 

But this is needed, this understanding is needed for the readers to go this far in depth and understand the reason why certain materials I view as anti-White. Was this intentional? Was this their strategy? You know, so back to the term White ethnics. Like I said, in the racial category of Whites in America, anyone who is not classified as Asian or black is classified as White, basically.

 

And all of those different subgroups have an additional unique identifier except for us, the original peoples of Europe.

 

So the position that leaves us us in is we have no way to measure our level of access to our own institutions. We have no way to measure if we are proportionately represented at all levels of our own society. We have no way to document discrimination against our subgroup by other subgroups, which, by extension, locks us out of accessing our own justice system. We have no identifier we can use to gather the evidence that’s needed to access our justice system and present this in front of a judge. Right?

 

So it was a total lockout, basically. So without going that far into. I mean, it just goes deeper and deeper and deeper, right. But to try to keep it at a level where I don’t want people going too far off into the weeds, I say, hey, here’s some important reasons why I propose a unique identifier for our subgroup. Those of us who are not members of special protection or special treatment classes, those of us who are the original peoples of Europe.

 

I like the term “White ethnics” because, a, it shows a shared heritage, but be, it acknowledges our different cultures and things along the way. And there’s no active erasure that happens. You know, Italians can still be Italians. Same for Germans, same for Irish, same for French. You know, we’re under the umbrella of White ethnics and then under the larger racial umbrella of White.

 

Natty: Now, just two quick points to come back on that one.

 

So this is where British readers, British listeners, are going to struggle with this, because for us, the umbrella term White doesn’t cover anyone else apart from the White British at the moment.

 

Now, judging by what’s happening in America.

 

Mark Collett: Well, it does. I’ll be wrong there. I think you’re wrong there. I’ve got to counter signal you immediately on this, because if you look at our census, our census does have White British, White other, and then a series of sort of like European ethnic categories as well. And I would argue, and this is just to throw this out there.

 

I mean, look, I’m not bashing Americans per se, but the term White is generally more of an Americanised term than something that’s less used or was less used in Europe or wasn’t used in Europe until it was imported from America, because America is a White or was founded essentially as a White multicultural nation. You know, there were Germans, there were Brits, there were.

 

Student X: America was founded by White ethnic, right?

 

Natty: Yeah.

 

Student X: By different White fighting amongst each other. They said:

 

“Okay, we’re going to have this homogenised identity of Whites. We’re putting all of you different White ethnics in this category. Stop the infighting.” That’s my story.

 

Natty: So hold on a second.

 

Mark Collett: But wait, I just got to say one thing. Like, in Europe. So in our census, myself, Natty, and Aunt Sally would all be classed as White British, which is the ethnic group we would be.

 

But in Europe, it is far more common. And sorry for cutting in May, but in Europe, it’s far more common to hear people talk of themselves in terms of things such as, like here, I’d say, I’m English, I’m English, I’m English.

 

And then there’d be Scots who say:

 

“Well, I’m Scots, I’m Irish, I’m Welsh.” We are only termed as White in the sense that we are White British.

 

Student X: On the census, that’s changing, though, because now you have the other installed populations that are coming. And take Ireland, for example. You have people installed from Zimbabwe. You have people like what’s her name, chu, who have taken it upon themselves to deconstruct Irish identity. And now they’re saying, all of us are going to be called Irish, and we’re going to hyphenate wide in front of that. When we refer to you. To indicate that you are no longer one in the same Irish does not mean only this. There is White Irish, and this is the creeping agenda that you’re seeing. They’re first separating your population from its own identity and allowing foreigners to claim it.

 

Natty: Yeah, that’s absolutely true! And just coming. Coming back to the question I was going to ask, and I may have been missing something from when I read the book, but why use the term White ethnics when White Europeans has become fairly synonymous both in Europe and America? To refer to ourselves or we’re dealing with revision.

 

Mark Collett: Before you answer that, Dr David Duke is somebody that everyone knows, I work with with regularly. And Dr David Duke coined the term European American. And if you’re friends with him on Skype, that’s his name, on Skype, Dr David Duke, European American. And he uses that term to differentiate and say that you could be a White American, but he is a European American, so he’s American of European descent. So an African-American, quite obviously, is a is a American of Elon Musk. Yeah. And he would. Elon Musk. Well, you know what I mean?

 

Student X: Mark, did you, did you see, a couple years back, there was a black woman who took to a stage. It was like a performative, but it was very dramatic. And she said:

 

“Europe does not mean a Whiteman. Anyone can be European. I’m here.”

 

Natty: This is.

 

Student X: But here’s the problem. You can dismiss it as nonsense, but this shows you the formula and the steps they use to actually make the change permanent in the permanent record. Right?

 

So if I were to use the term European American here in America, and I have all of these migrants who have recently been sold in Europe who are told, oh, we get to identify as European now. You know, they go identity shopping or whatever you want to call it. A. If I were to use the term European American here in America, that could include anyone who’s been installed into Europe, whether they have a heritage based connection.

 

Mark Collett: Oh, that’s fine. Look, by the way, this wasn’t. This wasn’t.

 

Student X: No, I know, I know.

 

Mark Collett: It was just genuine, a genuine kind of like, query. Just because I know, I do find these things quite interesting, although here’s what I’m getting at by what I said earlier about Americans being the ones that introduced the term White.

 

Student X: I know. No, no, no, I know. Here’s what I’m getting at, though. Why do I like the term White ethnics? Well, a the properties I said before, it acknowledges a shared heritage. It does not result in acts of erasure amongst the different subgroups within it.

 

But also, Mark, there’s now reclaiming properties. If I get White ethnics coded into law and an official identifier that can be used, I can now refer to you as a White ethnic English, or I can refer to someone in Ireland as White ethnic Irish or White ethnic Swedish or White ethnic German. It reclaims the identity that their population made with the intention for their heritage and it reattaches it to them by wording it that way. Sothere’s a lot. Think of language, kind of like you would mathematics. Right. There’s a certain end I’m trying to get to, and there’s certain things I’m going to do along the way to get there without even announcing it, because I don’t want to give anybody a heads up. But that’s the long answer to your question.

 

Natty: So in a way, the term White ethnics is like a lot of

Aunt Sally: The

Natty: Lessons and the experiments are not experiments, but when you ask people to go away and do something is like a judo move where you’re using their terminology against them and holding us under the same umbrella to basically turn us from the victim into.

 

Student X: Because we use these as a heritage based identifier. We always knew them to be that. Well. Silently, someone else came along saying:

 

“Hey, I want to start revising the category this is and make sure the whole world gets to claim this identity.”

 

I even saw a while back, like a year or two ago, there’s a black politician there in the UK. He said:

 

“I want the census English to be defined to where other groups can claim to be English because we are English.”

 

So he’s trying to take it away as an ethnic identifier and open it up for the west of the world to use, thereby leaving your group without a unique identity, thereby leaving your group vulnerable to being dissolved off into a giant tidal wave of global traffic. You know, that’s how this works.

 

So when I look at what way do I need to phrase this? What kind of a language lock do I need to put in the terms so that can’t happen again? I like the term White ethnics. It had all the properties I was looking for but now I didn’t even go into this depth of an explanation in the book because the point was:

 

“Hey, simply pointing out that we have no unique identifier we can use to document discrimination, access our own justice system, or measure, you know, our current levels of access should have been sufficient.”

 

I’m not going to tell everybody the real agenda behind all this stuff and how it’s going to perform.

 

Natty: Well, that’s a really good point, because it highlights the one of the differences between me, Mark, and Sally, and hopefully the intended audience of this book is that we are. We’re not. We’re not hatchlings. We’re not. We’re not young students.

 

I mean, I suspect that me, Mark, and Sally are all probably a little bit older than.

 

So this is. It’s been a while since any of us have been through the education system, and we’re slightly more well versed on the rhetoric and the propaganda and the marketing machine that’s kind of demonised us.

 

Student X: Good.

 

I mean, there’s those of us who have seen. Who have been in this a lot longer and thought our way through these things and see a little bit further ahead, and we’re just trying to bring on a larger part of the population and warn them, like, hey, you need to know these things. So I’m really glad to be in your guys’s company.

 

And like I said, I understand this is a very controversial topic as far as the use of the word White, but my aim is to show through explanation and through examples. Hey, this one word White is being used in all these multiple different ways. So when a radical who uses it as part of their strategy to continuously flip and I. People confused and refuse to define the terms that they use and whatever, this is one of those tactics and you have to know to watch for it, you know?

 

Natty: Yeah, sure. I wasn’t being condescending or anything like that, but it’s really interesting the way this, the way the ideas in this book are laid out. It’s like from all the, from the, from the years I’ve been aware of, like an anti-White machine that’s kind of set against us. This book does quite a good job of like, if you imagine those ideas being a mat laid out on the floor, this book kind of pulls in each individual Strand out and lays them out so you can follow each of them and look where they come from. So it’s not, I’m not saying it’s not for us. It very much is. And it’s very good at laying out the individual thought processes and the individual reasons why certain words are used and certain terminology is used.

 

Student X: Yeah, I appreciate that. And that really was my goal.

 

Let me tell you guys. Most of my work hasn’t even been shown to the public.

 

So what I did was I said:

 

“Okay, this obviously goes way deeper than I expected it, right?”

 

So I said, what are the, what are the concepts I can use in relay in a logical manner? What can I give terms to that are not derogatory, that allow people to talk about them without getting in trouble? You know, what kind of communication tools can I create and cultivate and disseminate for everybody else?

 

So these were the top concepts I pulled. These are the ones I said, this is what should be in this book and how they all tie in together at the end. After you’ve learnt each of these concepts, at the end, you’re going to have basically the playbook that these evil teachers are using against the student body. And you might just know these tactics a little better than they do and be able to wield them a little better than they do because they’re, a lot of them are operating under a lower level narrative just to get them to do what the administration wants them to do. They’re not fully clued in on a lot of this stuff. Right. I actually reverse engineer stuff. I own a giant dry erase board with the multicolor pin packs. I will literally sketch things out like you see on a movie, like where there’s a writing all over the wall. I will leave it up. I will go back, I’ll make adjustments. I’ll retest it. I’ll test my responses to certain verbiage and stuff like that. And all that is what went into this.

 

And a lot of the explanations as to why it’s designed the way it is, they’re not relevant. I just need to make it target the Right audience with it and say:

 

“Hey, here’s some instructions. I’m going to show you a roadmap. When they say this to you, ask these direct questions to kind of bust up their language manipulation tactics and stuff like that.”

 

So one other thing on that concept of colour is there’s a different chapter called denial of identity. Right? And in that chapter, I asked you, hey, would it seem strange to you guys if I personally were just to fly to Africa and flood their school system with literature that trains everyone to refer to everything as African except for black people? Would that seem like a strange way for me to train that population to talk? I think yes. And then I ask, is it equally strange that somebody has flooded America school system with material that trains everyone to call everything American except for White people? They’re referred to by their colour. I argue, yes, it’s strange. That tactic, denial of identity, is now in Ireland. I’ve seen it pop up and stuff from the UK when I’m, when I’m researching over there. So.

 

So they are actively detaching you from your I own heritage based identity and allowing the insurgent populations to claim that identity. And they’re all being trained to refer to you by your colour instead, visual observation. And this goes back to that first chapter. You know, when you refer to people by their colour, you’re impacting that entire colour category in a lot of ways without even fully realizing it. You’re engaging in-group defamation. You are incriminating all people on the planet at the same time who’s in that colour category. Right?

 

So we have been kind of desensitized to having national conversations about White people, right?

 

But we don’t have the same national conversations about yellow, brown, and black people, even though we’ve been desensitized to it and it’s been normalised to point it at us. No one else wants that exact same language structure pointed back in their direction. Right? So all this stuff intertwines, guys.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I was going to say this is a good point to throw over to Sally, because Sally hasn’t had a chance to say much, and she was sorting out her stuff. Sally, have you got anything to say on this or any questions that you’ve specifically got to ask up to this point or anything that you. You’d like to raise?

 

Aunt Sally: Oh, I want to raise this, but this is. Goes towards what you were all just saying. It’s something I noted on page 74. It says, the goal in destroying a recognised population of people and slowly revising them out of existence is first to destroy their group identity and ensure it’s no longer officially recognised, socially validated, or reinforced by the general population. This is because any population which does not have an officially recognised identity will no longer exist as a group and will be mixed away into a sea of global traffic, which sort of sums up what we, very powerful words there. But I ended up making so many notes about this book, I was basically rewriting the book in my own words. It’s just such a brilliant book.

 

And I actually strongly disagree with what you said earlier, Mark, that it’s a book more for the young. It isn’t at all, because it’s helped me tremendously. It’s opened my eyes to a lot of what’s going on now, but also what happened to my generation, how this crap creeped in. And my three children. I had a child in every decade. So I had one in the seventies, one in the eighties, one in the nineties, and actually could have gone on had one in the two thousands, because I was 14 in 2000, still fertile, but I didn’t. So I’ve seen it happen incrementally over the years in our country.

 

And I think the big thing that they did, and I noticed this, was to destroy the English identity in particular, while still letting the Irish and the Scottish. I’m not sure about the Welsh. I think they were on at them as well. But they’ve been destroying the English identity to the point now where we don’t exist, even on paperwork on a form you can fill in an online form, but English doesn’t exist, but Welsh and Scottish and Irish does. And I’ve actually typed in English, and it’s been deleted by the auto thing, so we don’t exist as a group.

 

And I think part of that was voluntary, where they portrayed the English as a bunch of football hooligans and their dwarf. Well, so that middle class English people didn’t want to identify with them. I don’t know if the Whiteman van thing with the England flag on it. That was all directed at anti-English. And literally the middle class population moved away from the label. And now no one really, no one says it anymore, that they’re English. And maybe they’ll do that with the Irish and the Scottish. I don’t know the Scottish. They have such a strong identity. I can’t seem ever getting away with it there. I’m not so sure about the Welsh.

 

Natty: Well, sal, you make a really good point. You just jogged my memory about something because I was going to mention earlier that the people who have put these narratives in place and have had a very long game plan with this stuff have used wedge issues and the grey area to push this stuff through. So in the United States, the history of slavery was used to create this divide and to drive a wedge in that all of this stuff could flow in, behind. And in the UK, I’m pretty sure, and this is just an idea and I may be wrong about this, but that divide was the class divide and that’s how they’ve done it, to make the middle class really find the working class, like you said, the White van man with an England flag hanging out his window as like, something utterly repulsive and say, we don’t want. We want to disassociate with that kind of person so much that we’re willing to welcome in the kind of middle class Nigerian dentist or doctor or whatever else is so these wedge issues that exist in societies have been used to create a gap wide enough to start forcing this stuff through until it just becomes like a tidal flood that you can’t stop.

 

Student X: Yeah, let me propose this to you guys, too, because there’s a lot of booby traps, so to say, that have been put in place before this agenda was targeting us. So back to, let’s say that an Irish person sitting in school and a Nigerian was recently installed. The teacher goes, okay, this is what Irish means, and points to the Nigerian kid. If the Irish kid said:

 

“Hey, you know, Africans or whatever group are not Irish, yada yada!”

 

They will then get slapped with a policy that school has on racism, discrimination and whatever, right? So a different approach is for the Irish kid to be trained to say:

 

“Hey, this is what we know to be denial of identity. When you’re using my population’s identity in an inside out way or in a way that distorts it and separates my population from it. So we want material that reinforces our Irish identity instead of material that revises it and takes it away.”

 

Phrasing it that way, giving them that term, denial of identity bypasses all of those little landmines and stuff like that, and they can say that directly to the administration. They can avoid naming any other groups. All of the policies on discrimination or whatever don’t even come into play. It’s a valid claim on the Irish kids part. They just need to be trained, like I said, to bob and weave. You know, you think of those spy movies when people drop down on that really thin little line and kind of blow cigarette smoke to see where the lasers are. This is what this book is aimed to train people to do.

 

And their parents, anybody outside who’s helping them and providing support to them, anyone who’s emailing the administrations, asking the correct questions and doing the data gathering, even people in the legal field who can draw on this verbiage and these frameworks to strengthen their arguments and increase their chances at winning when they challenge this stuff, this is all built in here, and this is what this is to do.

 

I’m basically showing you, hey, this is the enemy’s playbook. These are the main dirty tricks they’re going to use on you. Here’s how you respond, here’s how you move without getting in trouble. So.

 

Mark Collett: I don’t know if you want to follow up there, Sally. I didn’t want to jump in because you’ve not really had as much chance to talk as everyone else tonight. I was hoping that you would.

 

Aunt Sally: No, no, because I was just busy scanning my notes now, because I’ve got so many, and I’m just looking for the next question. A lot of the things that I actually did write down, you’ve already covered.

 

So I’ve just been. I’ve just been listening.

 

Mark Collett: I was feel guilty you sat here, though, because you don’t. Sometimes you don’t get as much time as everyone else. I was hoping to throw something more your way rather than. Because I think tonight. Tonight we’ve actually focused less on the book, and we seem to have. We seem to have focused more on probably other things about the themes of the book, rather than doing sort of a chapter by chapter breakdown, etcetera. But I have found it really interesting. But if there’s nothing else you want to add, I’ll throw it back over to Natty.

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, I’m just looking at my notes, so I have got a few questions, so I’ll come back in a sec.

 

Mark Collett: Are you sure you don’t go now?

 

Aunt Sally: I’m sure. I’m sure. Like, you just carry on flowing. Sorry, Natty.

 

Mark Collett: Go for it, mate.

 

Student X: Natty, you mentioned slavery earlier. Yeah, yeah. Can I add to that?

 

Natty: I was going to ask you next about this idea of cropped narratives, because you talk about crop narratives, and one of the biggest topics in there is this idea of slavery. There’s a really good picture, actually, that describes it. And there’s pictures throughout the book, and they’re very. Not childish, but, like, they’re very simple. They’re very easy on the eye cartoons. Right? And this picture explains it perfectly. I wish I could bring it up on screen. If I’d had time, if I’d had the sense to do this, I would have sent it to Mark so he could show you.

 

But it’s basically the idea of slavery. There’s like a picture of Africa with Europe above it and the lines of where slaves came from and where they went to. So there’s obviously European slaves who got taken from the shores of Spain, France, and even England. Cornwall. The Cornishmen were taking slaves as well and sent to the Middle East.

 

And there’s also lines emanating from Africa coming up to Europe, which is where they were sent. But you have this, like, cropped on your iPhone, if you crop a photo, you get this little square that comes around it, and you can move it around, you can Zoom in, zoom out, crop it. And the part of Europe where the arrows are leading out of Europe, which is where slaves were taken from, too, is completely cropped out, so that all you see is Africa with the lines going out of it.

 

So maybe we could talk about cropped narratives a little bit.

 

Student X: Definitely! And this goes back to my strategy of, it’s more effective to name the actual tactic and confront the teacher for using that manipulation tactic than it is to speak about the subject at hand. Right, right.

 

Natty: So rather than, like, whining about, oh, yeah, but White people were taken slaves, too.

 

Student X: Right, right.

 

Natty: We were victims as well, rather than being on the back foot with that.

 

Student X: Say, right, because then they’ll try to hit you with their other policies, racism, discrimination, whatever. And I just. I, Bob. And we’ve all through that. I say, hey, you know, an example? In America, Washington, non-White slave owners and non-black slaves were cropped out of all school lesson plans nationwide for decades. And that level of precision does not happen naturally on its own. That requires coordination, that requires planning, that requires people at higher levels who disseminate to all of the different schools below them.

 

So that in itself is enough, gives us enough information to confirm it was then intended intentionally. Right.

 

And then we have these guilt monuments that are built in real life, like these museums about slavery, or these little, you know, monuments to pass slaves or whatever, to provide support to those crop narratives that were disseminated in school. Right? And slavery is not the only one, though.

 

Now, one thing I do touch on is there’s been this really big ruckus for we want reparations. You know, and my response is, you can’t. I don’t support reparations if they’re all based on cropped narratives. You know, if you’ve cropped out the fact that White people fought to end a slave trade that was started by elite black Africans, you don’t really deserve a penalty to be signed to our population. It’s misdirected. You have to focus it at the source. You have to send that to the people who arranged all this and who made it possible, which is to elite black Africans. You know, that’s where. That’s the proper way to direct it, you know?

 

But I think that when radicals try to activate different groups and try to engineer conflict and destabilise things, this is a very effective tool at turning different groups against one another. Right? Because when I was growing up in school, that left me under the impression that only White people owned slaves and only black people were slaves.

 

And then all of the social retaliation, the negative remarks, the if beatings ever came into play for other people, whatever, all of that was justified by citing these crop narratives, which were given lots of air time and lots of circulation, both in the schools and in the media platforms. Right? So, bypassing the most effective way.

 

And I thought:

 

“Okay, what strategy can I use to give your average person, or even a younger person, who is now challenging some older PhD who’s skilled in manipulation? What term can I give them to incriminate that teacher for trying it to show that all they’re doing is using a manipulation tactic and really to speak down to them.”

 

And I say, let’s name the tactic. Let’s call it a cropped narrative. Slavery is not the only subject. We see crop narratives used in other countries, like Germany. We see monuments put there. We see them all over, and they’re very tightly controlled. A lot of times, people recite these crop narratives or point to one of these guilt monuments, and then it’s always followed up with concession demands or extortion demands, transfer money to me, you know, things like that, and they’re really used as a money making scheme over generations to continuously milk the host population of that country and to freeload off of it, basically.

 

So to create a communication tool that’s simple, that stays out of the weeds, that people can use without getting hit by the discrimination policies or accusations of whatever ism, I said, let’s just call it a crop narrative and let’s teach people about this concept. And you’re absolutely right, Natty. I took that icon. I was inspired by the phone. Your ability to crop an image and determine what you want to be publicly visible and what you want to be cropped out before you present it to the public. And this is literally one of the communication tools.

 

Natty: I’m just thinking of your board with all the circles with things written on and lines going this way and that way, and the crop, like, you could crop out just one connection and focus on it and say this is the whole issue, whereas in reality, there’s all of these spider lines going everywhere and different ideas and different actions taken throughout history that feed into it. And before I pass it on, I just want to hammer on this again just one last time. Instead of being defensive, just ask why, when someone is talking this way, why they are ignoring it rather than saying, no, no, we. You know, I don’t think this is right, or I think this is no. Why you ignoring so much of this topic? Why have you only decided to focus on this one specific thing? I think that’s a really, really strong, strong rhetorical corner.

 

Student X: Them, Natty. Students should be trained to ask the teachers, hey, why are you using crop narratives instead of complete ones? What is your real intention in this class? Because this doesn’t seem like it’s education. Is that, like, a false cover argument? Are you really here to instigate trouble or incite violence? You can really push that teacher up against the wall or that activist and say, you need to explain your actions, and this is a way for you to word it and to do it that a, that teacher hasn’t seen before. It’s new material. And be, puts the power in the hands of the kid at the student level or the parent or the attorney, if they’re involved, or so on, know.

 

Natty: Yeah, absolutely! Fantastic! I really. I really like that. And I really like that chapter for that. For that very reason. I’ll let someone else talk.

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah. Can I just say with those, the cartoon through the book, they’re brilliant! They’re really, really brilliant! I just wondered, did you design them yourself or. Because whoever drew them knew exactly what you meant, so I just thought.

 

I’m just curious for that.

 

Student X: Thank you.

 

Aunt Sally: And another thing want to ask, I want to say is I love these little phrases like crop narratives. I’ve sort of started making notes of them. Guilt monuments. Brilliant! And there’s a few more I can see. Part time Whites. That’s a brilliant one. The minority privilege. Love that. Yeah. But, yeah. Please answer my question. Who designed them and how?

 

Student X: Thank you, Sally. I appreciate it. So, as far as finding people to work on this book, a lot of people were scared, so I had to search online, and I had to locate other folks that happened to be out of the country, but I think it was kind of fate. So I located a gentleman who was in Hungary, and I was able to supply him some good income streams and whatnot.

 

And what I would do is I would actually make the memes on my phone. They were kind of crude or whatnot, but he was the artist, and then it would give him a better idea of where I wanted him to take the picture and whatnot. The idea I was trying to convey and we worked together for a few months and all the pictures and everything the way I wanted them or were good enough and then I put them in the book. What was most important to me was that wording, this using simple language that I wanted to reach the lowest level readers out there that I could. Not just the intellectuals, right. But this, I want to be to reach as many people as possible.

 

But also, I’ve noticed that there have been deliberate attempts to make our population illiterate. Right. And to sidestep that illiteracy. Memes and illustrations have the ability to do that.

 

So I wanted to marry both of them in there. And depending on what type of reader dealing with, increase the chances of do you understand this concept? Do you understand what’s being directed at you? And do you understand how to defend yourself and stand your ground?

 

Aunt Sally: So I think that’s one of I really, really love this book. And that’s one of the things I like, is its a positive book in that it tells you what you can do in them in the most lawful way or the most agreeable way without causing conflict. I really love it. I can’t recommend it highly enough, I’ll say that at the end.

 

But, yeah, I love the way you give people the verbal tools and the backup, really, the wording to back it up with, to argue their corner. I just love it!

 

Student X: Thank you. I appreciate it. High praise.

 

One thing I think a lot of people need to realise is a lot of the mainstream terms that are marketed like discrimination or racism or whatever through various means. The definitions of those have been revised through academia or in the legal system, through case precedent. They’re revised so that they really exclude anything that’s directed at White people. And they’re therefore, by extension, do not offer equal protection to us. Right.

 

And I think this is where, this is one of the things that are exploited when we Whites engage in these conversations and say:

 

“Well, this is racist, or that is racist!”

 

Well, then the radical reply is:

 

“No, it’s not, because X, Y and Z.”

 

And these conversations just go on for forever, like semantics. So I do encourage the use of the term anti-White as a way of working around that and sidestepping the debate and actually moving forward and making progress.

 

And then I’ve tried to establish some kind of criteria or guidelines to say:

 

“Hey, these are the properties you can look for. And if you find these, you can say, yes, this piece of material or this remark is anti-White.”

 

You know, you’re levying charges or incriminating White people for things that are not even unique to White people. You know, and you could go the direction of, so did the other colour groups, so did the other racial categories, so did this sort of that none of that’s unique to us. You’re just really bringing about a public shaming session or trying to make extortion demands from our population. You know, it’s, it’s. We have to take the longer way and work around it because they’ve, they’ve got all these language locks in place, you know, so.

 

Natty: Yeah, it’s a good point. Just to. Just to cap that, we, the people who are teaching this stuff in schools have been trained to use. To use language as a weapon, whereas we’ve been trained to, or taught not to use language as a weapon. And the inherent politeness of White people is being used against us.

 

And I think to understand that words, words can be like a game of chess, or a judo match or something, is quite important. And this book does a good job of explaining that and giving you the tools to use it in that way.

 

Aunt Sally: Something I wanted to, something I didn’t quite get, the only thing I didn’t quite get is, and it might be because it doesn’t apply to us so much here in the UK, but the four colour categories are White, black, yellow and brown, where they’re all sort of being moulded into every ethnic group that’s yellow.

 

So the Chinese and the Japanese and the Koreans and whatever, they’re all yellow and they’re taking away, are they taking away their individual identities as well as they’re doing to the White population or European population? Or is it. They’re just doing it for other purposes so that because they’re doing it to Whites. I don’t know if I’m making sense. It’s a bit that I didn’t.

 

Student X: Yeah, I understand.

 

And like I said earlier, that chapter was the hardest. I had to work the longest on that chapter just due to that concept, trying to bring it, bring it to existence and show it to others, you know?

 

But one of the ways, you know, as you encounter people publicly, one of the ways you can refer to them is you can refer to them by their name if, you know, them, or you can refer to them by their cultural or heritage based identity, or you could refer to them by their colour. Right. Their visual observation. Oh, I saw this colour person or that colour person today on my way. So and so these are all options when we, when we phrase the remarks and the statements we want to make and the effect we want those statements to have as they reach the broader population.

 

So this one subject shows you, hey, when you’re referring to people by their colour category, because all of us can do it, and all of us, you know, can have it directed at us, this shows you an example, physical colour.

 

So that’s where you see above each of those colour groups. You’ll see the individual identities crossed out. Those are not being enforced anymore. Right. And you’re just referring to them by what colour they are. And then it kind of shows the reader, it walks the reader through the application process, the effect it has on the general population, the way they react. And then it shows the reader, this is how you can actually pivot this, make it your own and redirect it or wield it yourself. You know, this is how you can strengthen arguments, or you can assign blame to a colour group as opposed to an individual.

 

And most importantly, this is the way that 100% of the incoming populations, this is the standard way they’ve been trained to speak, think, and write about our population, but our population has not been given that same training to use that same language structure back.

 

Therefore, they’re not experiencing the same social climate or all of the negative social effects that they have created for ours. And this is really just pointing that out simply by the way you phrase things and structure it shows you the abilities you have to pivot populations and people without them fully detecting it. So.

 

Natty: Okay, unless Mark or Sally’s got anything to add to that, I want to move on to, very briefly, just touch on this because we. I think most people listening would have heard this before, and it’s one of the most prevalent kind of anti-White terms.

 

But there’s a there’s a very short chapter on White privilege. And you say something here that is like a perennial truth. You say there’s nothing White about the general concept of inherent rights that all populations have to their own societies and institutions. It’s a universal understanding. The unrelated populations around the world do not possess the same inherent rights or sense of ownership to the societies or institutions of other populations.

 

So maybe you could just touch on the building blocks that you’ve already laid out in the previous few chapters, how that comes into play with White privilege.

 

Student X: Yeah, definitely. So I encountered that argument firsthand, personally, and it took me a while to kind of detangle that riddle, so to speak.

 

And basically, first of all, there’s a number of things that intersect with this. Right? Right. In that chapter I explained. I start off by explaining a privilege checklist can be constructed and pointed at any group. Right. You just have to change the criteria that’s being put on that list, and you could redirect which group’s going to be targeted by it. So what is this exercise, truly? I think it’s one of those public humiliation rituals that are used in past communent movements or the struggle sessions or the public sessions. I think that truly is what this is. White privilege is just one of the flavours that comes in. Right. You can use different subjects, but this is what they get the group to surround you and do.

 

Secondly, it appears that all they’re doing is changing the name of White rights to a privilege for these incoming foreigners to be instructed to challenge. Right? Which, you know, for those who support globalism and borderless world and whatever this is, what they want those populations to do is they want to take away our sense of ownership to our own societies, our sense of protecting them. And they want to say:

 

“Oh, what you have is now the property of the globe. And you don’t have any special rights or you’re not more entitled to be here than foreigners are. You just have this privilege that we’re here to challenge.”

 

Right. And going through that chapter, I kind of talked about, okay, well, let’s say you know why don’t I fly one of you on a plane to Nigeria? I think I put an illustration in there that I don’t know if you saw that one, Nettie, but it just shows you this is how you can wield it. This is how you can turn it back on them.

 

Natty: There’s a brown guy standing here. He says:

 

“Why are you moving to Nigeria?”

 

And the little White kids come in, he says:

 

“To challenge black privilege!”

 

Student X: Yeah, simple as that.

 

So one of the questions, knowing that now, this was one of the subjects that came up when I was in one of my meetings with. There was more than one Dean at this meeting, and I had, I think, people from Academic Affairs there and someone from the curriculum committee. So somebody up there was feeling really important and saying, I have a PhD, and whatever. So I thought, let me ask them this. How are you, like, can you explain the difference between White rights and White privilege? Can you explain how you personally are differentiating between those two concepts when you recite the scripting and they couldn’t? And I phrased the question that way to basically stab it right then and there on the thing that all you’re doing is changing the name of our rights to a privilege. You’re telling invading populations to feel entitled to challenge White rights. And that’s literally all you did.

 

Natty: Now, when I heard this argument, this is one of the things I wasn’t so sure about, because I imagine that using, using that rhetorical language of saying, how are you differentiating between White privilege and White rights, that the people who are ideologically ingrained with this kind of anti-White narrative wouldn’t have a problem with saying:

 

“Well, White rights is something that we should oppose as well, because it’s White supremacy.”

 

And I know that’s a little bit further on in the book, but that seems to me. And now I, it’s all very well me saying this. You use this, you use this against. You use this in a proper conversation against someone who is using the term White privilege. But it seems to me like people who are ingrained and ideologically in tune with anti-White narratives wouldn’t have a problem in saying, I don’t care if it’s White privilege or White rights, we should be opposed to it. Does that make sense?

 

Student X: Yeah. And there’s like I said, I tested a lot of this literature out online in real life with just random, like, tweets at radicals and stuff like that. And I tested the responses I got back, and what I found was, they do they do engage in semantics, right?

 

So if I were to take a direct approach and try to argue, no, these things are rights and they’re not privileged, that argue would go on forever. Right? But if I say okay. If I know that they’re trying to flip flop, let me do it this way.

 

Let me ask them, can you explain the difference between these two concepts? Show me how you’re differentiating between these two. Since you’re the one talking about it, let me put it on them and take away their ability to flip flop when I. When I structure that way. Sure.

 

Natty: Yep.

 

Student X: And that even worked up. There was nobody in that meeting with the Deans, the PhDs, the act, the so-called academics and whatever. And I literally took down a room of eight people on my own, not even somebody with a degree. I just. I can cut through the, you know what? You know. So I take a different approach. When I notice manipulation tactics being used in lieu of honesty or intellect, I say:

 

“Okay, how can I disable this manipulation tactic?”

 

And I try to take that. So.

 

Aunt Sally: Can I ask something? And it’s not actually about the book. It’s a phrase that you see it a lot in Right-wing circles, I think, and I don’t like it because it doesn’t. The Kalergi Plan, you know, where they’re supposed. There’s this plan to get everyone to breed with and mix up the races and whatever. Yeah. As if it’s some sort of benevolent thing they want people to do so that we’re all one colour and one race, which is that implies that they really want us all to be all get on, which is nonsense! But I just wonder what you thought. How.

 

I think it’s nonsense, but it’s for me trying to explain to people, don’t go on about the Kalergi Plan, because it’s really the opposite. They’re bringing that it’s something that they use. People can use it as, oh, this is what they do. And they want us all to breathe. No, they don’t! They don’t. They want us all to conflict. That’s the thing. I just wondered what you thought of it.

 

Student X: So I do believe that agenda to be real and in motion. I personally don’t use that terminology. I took a different approach, and I kind of built that into the chapter on denial of identity, because it will function. Because to beat that agenda, to survive that agenda, we need the ability to reclaim our identity and reinforce its existence. Right? That’s how we do it.

 

So I don’t really need to go into, like, historical citations or discussions of older plans like that and walk people through a history lesson, a, because I’m going to lose a portion of them along the way, but be, there’s already verbiage surrounding that where they have names to call you and stuff, if you even try to educate people on it.

 

So I just took a different approach. I said:

 

“Hey, when you encounter material that uses denial of identity in it, as explained in this book, I showed people a number of ways that you can challenge that.”

 

We want stuff that reinforces our identity as the Irish. We don’t want you training everyone to call themselves the Irish and referring to us by our colour. Because what happens over time is if there’s no identifier for your population and you don’t exist on paper, you don’t exist in the census. The definition and the dictionary has been changed and legal precedent has been set. If there is no word for your kind and you get flooded, you know, 20 to one with global traffic, you will be dissolved off and disappear into that global traffic because there’s no name to call you, there’s nothing to keep you together, you know, that’s just how I understand it.

 

Aunt Sally: No, that’s brilliant! Yeah.

 

Natty: Just on that term, you say global traffic. Probably a more common term that we would use, or we, I don’t know, in the circles I move in would just be mass immigration. And I think, and I don’t know, maybe you’re going to say I’m wrong here, but I think mass immigration is a more. It has like a more negative connotation, and it sounds deliberate.

 

Whereas global traffic could mean just a natural occurrence, which is one of the things that the people responsible for this are. Try and argue that it’s just a natural movement of people. Why did you use the term global traffic?

 

Student X: Agreed. Like I said, as I tested a lot of this verbiage in terms, one thing I encountered was there were already people who had a pre-planned ability to counter argue it or to defame it.

 

So what I wanted to do was be able to convey things using verbiage or scripting or terms that does not have handles on it, allowing the enemy to grab onto, to really work with. You know what I mean?

 

So when I just say global traffic, I’m just talking about this tidal wave of people from all over the world. I have excluded, you know, any reference to ethnicity, colour, nationality, or whatever, because I. And I can still convey the concept and educate people, this is what’s going to happen. But I can word it in a way where the opponents don’t really have much to grab onto. And using the term global traffic doesn’t express negative connotation. It just. It’s a it’s expresses an overwhelming volume that’s just going to get dumped in a small space and kind of wash out the existing population there.

 

Natty: Sure, yeah, I understand that. I’ll pass it back. Mark or Sal, if you’ve got questions.

 

Aunt Sally: There’s another term that he says, don’t say diversity, use the term variety. I’m not sure about that myself, because variety. Variety is kind of its a nice word to me, it’s a positive word.

 

And now here, diversity is amongst the general population, the English people, we think of it as a bad word now. Like it’s dividing.

 

I think that’s the latin root for it, isn’t it? It’s a divisive word, but things like we’ll say where they put barriers up to stop the bombs and whatever going off. In London, we call them diversity barriers. You know, at Christmas, they put up these bombs. We call them diversity barriers. So now, diversity, the word is people associate it negatively here. It’s progressed to that.

 

So I’m not sure about it might be different in America.

 

Mark Collett: I’d agree with you on that, Sally, because we also have something here, diversity targets, and they are very unpopular amongst normal people.

 

So if you say to people, oh my company’s got a diversity target now. That’s something that gets people rolling their eyes.

 

Whereas there are.

 

Whereas variety. The thing with the difference between diversity and variety in England is diversity is something that now has a connotation of being forced upon you to cause an outcome.

 

So it’s not opportunity, it’s not, what am I looking for here? It’s not about bringing about equality of opportunity, it’s about bringing about an outcome. It’s not that everyone has the same starting block and everyone gets to come to the job interview, because a lot of people in Britain agree with that if you say to people in the UK, do you believe in equality of opportunity? They will say:

 

“What do you mean? Everyone should be able to attempt to get the job.”

 

People will say:

 

“Absolutely, we do agree with that. We believe that anyone should be able to walk into that company and sign up in the sense that they can attend the job interview.”

 

But they will then say:

 

“Well, actually, though, we believe that the person who gets the job should be the best person for the job and there shouldn’t be a forced diverse outcome.”

 

Whereas variety is something like, well, if you go to. If you go to an all you can eat buffer, you’d say:

 

“Oh, there was a lot of variety.”

 

And that’s like a good thing.

 

So I do think there might be some linguistic differences in the UK between the UK and potentially, obviously, America. And that might sound obvious to people, but I do think that’s an important thing to raise because diversity is a dirty word here. And I’ll just throw that back to you as soon. X. Is diversity seen as a positive thing still in America? Because, as I said here, it’s much more maligned to the point where if you see a headline in a newspaper that uses the word diversity, obviously anyone, chime in if you think I’m wrong with this. Usually if you see a headline in a newspaper that uses the term diversity or the word diversity, it’s one of those things where people will immediately be like:

 

“Oh, God, diversity!”

 

Student X: Same here. What the context that was put in. I think she’s referring to the chapter that touches on some of the top used terms, the higher mileage terms that we see in the media and whatnot. And there’s a couple of things that intersect here and come into play. One, one of the forms of manipulation that we are targeted with is the radicals will make up secondary or altered alternative definitions to words and when. And the radicals use that definition in their normal conversation and stuff without disclosing that they’re doing it.

 

So a lot of times it leaves someone on the other side kind of scratching their head and saying, is that really what that means? Or whatever, or it goes to debate and so on.

 

Right now in this book, what was explained to the students is the success of these radicals relies on the whether or not they’re successful at forcing you to participate, to validate and to normalise and to accept this type of scripting and stuff like that. And the way that you cause that to malfunction on the ground level is to opt out, to disrupt, right? So around that term diversity, it says, you know, we’re often told scripting to recite or say that we value diversity.

 

And I encourage the students to disrupt and say, we’re not going to say that. Instead, I could say I value variety, but I can’t say I value diversity.

 

And here’s the logic behind that. Diversity is just divestment by another name. There is no difference in the way a divestment policy impacts your country, then a diversity policy impacts your country.

 

So if I go to, let’s say, Korea, which they’re now being targeted, and I enter a diversity policy, I am divesting and the Koreans themselves and I am transferring all that stuff over to non-Koreans, right, to increase diversity.

 

Now, we’ve all seen recently in the news that certain boycott or divestment policies have been met with swift action, Executive Orders, media, you know, co-operation and all that. Right. They won’t allow a divestment policy.

 

So how do you skate through a divestment policy in a majority White country? You change the name of it to a diversity policy, and you kind of push it through the legal system that way, if that makes sense.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, well, we’ll move on, then. And we’ve got a Superchat here. It’s from Glen19. He says:

 

“Natty, I hear you’re in the military. Have you checked out the new Antelope Hill book, the 60 year Caucasian War? I think Russia shouldn’t have conquered the East Caucus because it. Because it cost more in political stability than it was worth. Russians hate Caucasians more than any other minority.”

 

Natty: Well, I was in the military. I’m not anymore, and I haven’t heard of the book.

 

However, I’m just very, very lightly aware of what he’s talking about.

 

And I think the if I’m not mistaken, the general idea is that the Russian country, by prosecuting a war in the Caucasus, allowed a certain ethnic group to foment the revolution that happened at the end of the or the beginning of the 19 hundreds, basically, and bled the Russian government dry.

 

Now, I might be wrong about that’s my very surface level understanding of what he’s talking about. But this book by Antelope Hill seems to go into that in some depth, so I won’t try and talk on it because I don’t really know much, but that’s my basic understanding of what he’s talking about there.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, well, it wasn’t based around the book anyway. So look, the book we’re reviewing, and we’ve got another dot. We’ve got a very generous donation from Wally Fender, who gave $50 and said:

 

“Cheers!”

 

Well, thank you so much, my friend. I’m pleased you’ve enjoyed the stream. That’s the donations for tonight.

 

So that was short. And to the.1 thing I was going to say is, does anyone have any last questions? Because we’ve got a maximum of 20 minutes left. We don’t have to drag it out. There’s no more questions or nothing else to say. I’ve really enjoyed tonight. I kind of regret doing this now as a book club because we get less viewers or fewer viewers, should I say, when we do a book club than we do if we just do sort of an interview? Because obviously people thought, well, I haven’t read the book. Why would I want to tune in etc. Etc. The football, bloody football was on tonight as well, and all that. And I kind of feel that Student X has given us something far more than a book review, which I don’t often say after these things. But for me, the most interesting part tonight was actually going through what it’s like being in an American school, the racial divides, how bad things really are. And I found that absolutely fascinating!

 

And to be honest, I could have probably sat for an hour or so more just talking about or asking questions about racial dynamics in a multiracial American school. You know, obviously, California is one of the most mixed race states, whereas there are probably other states out there which are largely White and retain almost a feel in their schools of sort of 1950s America or something like that.

 

But obviously in California, you’re not going to get that. And I found that really, really interesting.

 

So I want to thank Student X for that.

 

But I also want to throw out to you guys, is there anything else that you want to bring up before we go into summations and wrap things up.

 

Natty: I’ve got one question, and this might be controversial. I don’t know. It’s kind of related to modern, where we find ourselves at the moment, where there’s this war going on in the Middle East between Palestine and Israel, and it’s basically an ethnic cleansing that’s been carried out on behalf of Israel, and it’s generated a schism, as if there aren’t enough schisms on the dissident Right, the Right-wing, whatever you want to call it, where people are saying we shouldn’t be supporting one side or the other. If you’re going to be pro-White, just be pro-White.

 

Now, I just want to ask you, student time, do you think pro-White is the most valuable route to go down, or do you think there’s some value in recognizing that sometimes the enemy of your enemy is also your friend?

 

Student X: Well, I’ve actually been kind of passionate about this and recently, first of all, I don’t. I agree with you. It’s a cleansing.

 

Regardless of the semantics of what you want to call it’s a cleansing, number one.

 

Number two, anytime young children are getting taken out, there is no arguing about that it’s wrong.

 

Regardless of which way it occurs, young kids should not be involved in that. But third, I think we need to use this as leverage both in America and in the UK, because what I’ve seen is deliberate acts of disrespect. I’ve seen the government show in so many ways that they won’t defend the White population. Well, then we need to say, don’t ask us to defend you. If you’re not willing to explicitly outlaw anti-White ism, then best of luck, you go fight your own wars.

 

But you can’t ask us to defend you if you don’t defend us. Right?

 

So that’s a stopping point. I personally don’t want us to get into that. And it feels like it’s unfortunate, but the level of corruption, it actually takes this level of an ultimatum during this time to force them to cooperate and do what they should have been doing this entire time. That’s just my opinion. And if racial equity wants to come into it, then we can say, hey, we fought the first two.

 

The other groups have to fight the next two World Wars. You have to make an equitable contribution. You don’t just get free equitable asset distributions. You know what I mean?

 

So there’s a number of ways I tackle this, but a, we should not be involved in its not ours. And be, we need to use this as leverage against the government to force them to outlaw anti-White ism, restore self representation in all of our institutions at every level, and give us oversight and legal enforcement abilities, and restore our media reporting because we need the ability to report on attacks. You know, that block has to be removed and reversed.

 

So that’s my stance is a little tougher, so.

 

Natty: Okay. Yeah, thank you for that. I’ll hand over in case or Mark has got.

 

Aunt Sally: I’ve got a question I just want to ask. I really love the book. Are you writing anymore?

 

Student X: Oh, well, thank you. This was the first time I ever attempted to write a book. And I did it because, like I said, I’ve got something that needs to be said. And then I was motivated when I saw another kid and harmed by this stuff.

 

So this was the one that was the most important to me. I do have enough material to probably do three or four more. And this will be original works, new terms, new concepts, new strategies that no one’s ever seen! I already have a lot of it written out and sketched out, but I didn’t know how much went into writing a book, Sally. And I honestly don’t know if I could put myself through that again. But if the time arises and if I think I can coordinate it, the answer is yes. I already know the title. I already know what the chapters are going to be called. I already know what’s going to be in a lot of its just a matter of framing it correctly, testing some of the verbiage in terms, getting my artists back and getting this out there. You know, I would say, may I touch on a few other things, guys, that I wanted to cover while I had you? But we did.

 

Mark Collett: Sure, sure.

 

Student X: Go for it. This has to be done at the student level because there’s so much gate-keeping and so many policy changes that parents and outsiders are locked out.

 

So it’s only somebody who’s within the belly of the beast that can initiate this process. Right?

 

So this is why I’m speaking directly to the students. I’m bypassing all faculty, all politicians. Like, if they’re not even there, I’m saying:

 

“Hey, I’m speaking directly to you. Wherever you are in the world. This is something for you.”

 

And I’m going to show you this. You need to know this. Okay? So I want them to look for options to dissent, right? Because dissent and disrupt. Because these radicals, if they can’t normalise things through repetition or forced participation, then they can’t. They can’t really get certain stuff off of the ground, and it causes their agenda to fail. So dissenting is something students can do at the student level and cause it to malfunction without getting in trouble. Right?

 

So if you get. You know, if they want to force you to participate in a public shaming session, whether they call that cultural appropriation or White privilege or whatever other flavour they’re doing, the student can simply say, we’re not going to participate in a public shaming session. I don’t see anywhere in the guidelines or laws that say schools have the authority to force us to participate in these type of sessions.

 

So we’re opting out. We want something different. That’s all you got to say. It goes directly to the office of the administration. They don’t have recourse. They have to let you go. Right? So that doesn’t give the teacher the satisfaction. We already covered denial of identity. When you encounter material that uses this property, you can say, hey, this has denial of identity present in it. We want something different. This is not adequate for us. And you can dismiss a good chunk of their entire curriculum. You can disqualify a large portion of it just using this one topic.

 

But it’s really about chipping away. And at schools that have taught it’s impossible to be racist to White people, this one will give you a foothold on campus because they say all students and all people need to know to identify racial discrimination. How to confront it and how to defend themselves when they’re targeted. Right. So if White kids are at a school that says:

 

“Hey, we use the definition that it’s impossible to be racist to White people.”

 

Fine. White students won’t learn how to defend themselves or identify racial discrimination by attending your conference on racism. White students will now need their own dedicated conference and training on how to identify race based exclusion, how to challenge it, how to seek justice, and so on.

 

And this gives a really good example of dissenting right there on the spot, establishing a space that’s only for us, and it gives a valid reason, you know, so dissent, definitely very important. Political. Once these concepts and terms float out to the general population, which I don’t see how they’ll be stopped. They can’t call them derogatory or anything, but once this stuff floats out and more and more people become aware of it, you can now get active in the political arena. You can bring up old tweets or old news clippings of politicians who have used these tactics on public stages and call for them to be removed. Name the tactic, call for them to be removed and replaced with politicians who will pledge to fight against anti-White discrimination and represent us using White positive politics. You can kind of marry those two things together and put them out there in a publicly visible way, in a way that’s palatable to the general population. You don’t have to use negative verbiage words. You don’t have to mention the other groups. It’s really more about the skill and how you word it.

 

And like I said, in each of these chapters, at the end, there’s a dedicated section for students of what they can do pertaining to that one subject.

 

And there’s also a dedicated system section for politics and how you can start weaving this into your political action and the way you can phrase things and stuff like that. Like I said, view this more like a training manual the enemy’s playbook. I’m going to open this up. I’m going to show you what their next or what their common moves are. I should say show you how you can kind of get through those, still convey your message, what to ask for, and really start making institutional changes and start rolling a lot of this back.

 

So that’s what I wanted to say.

 

Natty: And just to cap that off, the last thing I’ve got written in my notes is how the situation we’re in and the reason that these narratives have been allowed to spread is because we’re not in power as a group.

 

However, this book gives you some degree of personal empowerment to fight back against it.

 

And I think that touches on what, basically everything you’ve just said, student time.

 

For that reason, it’s a really useful, non-worthwhile piece of literature.

 

Aunt Sally: Can I add to that that nati, that I think it is really important for everyone to read it’s not just for students, because as a parent or my children are all out of the school system now, but as a parent, quite often if your 15 year old is in trouble at school, you’re the one that’s got go and back them up. And if you’ve read this book and you’re behind your children, then that gives you the tools as a parent to go in and help your children child or argue with the teachers of just backing up your own children.

 

So I think it is an important book for everybody, even this old boomer here, because I can use it in my life and help my grandchildren now, very subtly or whatever.

 

But, yeah, I think it’s important that parents read it, too, because I know whenever my children were trouble at school and all my children were good children, but if there was a conflict, it would be me to back them up and I would. And it would help for that.

 

So, yeah, carry on.

 

Student X: I appreciate that, both of you. It means a lot to me. One other thing I wanted to add is we have to change the way we’re approaching this because we know that on the inside they’re corrupted and they’ve also been instructed not to acknowledge it verbally or to disclose that they’re operating that way. Right.

 

So we need to change our Angles and think about as far as existing politicians, what are direct questions you can ask them that you can’t get in trouble for? So one is will you work to outlaw anti-White discrimination? Ask that question in a public microphone and put them on the spot. Let’s see what they answer. Think about the optics. For a politician who resists the request, they have no win. When you ask it that way, you haven’t offended anyone and you can bring up a piece of paper or literature from a nearby school that says you can’t be racist to White people or whatever. So to show that it is valid. And we need to know, you know, we have to know how things are going to work here if we’re going to live here. So just that one other thing.

 

And then two, like I said, I greatly appreciate the feedback this was done more to get this off my chest and help as many people as I can, really, around the world, what’s been fashioned here, and once they’ve polished their rhetoric, so to speak, and gotten the recipe right, that finished product is now getting sent to the UK as a finished product is going to Australia. It’s going all over and it’s just blindsiding people that aren’t ready for it. So I’m hoping this is racing along behind it to help them. And if all of you could, once you get it, once you get time, if you could leave a review on the Amazon or like, a book review online or something to let you know, other people know, it would help make it more visible to all of them, and I would appreciate it.

 

Mark Collett: So not a problem.

 

Well, look, let’s do our final thoughts. We’ll go around the group, Natty, Aunt Sally, then me, and then Student X can have the final word and we’ll shut things down.

 

Natty: It’s very clear that Student X is a very intelligent and well thought out individual. I think there are lots of people on whatever you want to call this dissident Right, the far-Right, who are criminally underrated and have been shut down by a system that doesn’t want their ideas and thoughts out there. And Student X is obviously belongs to these people. This has been a more foreign, in depth and educational stream than I thought it was going to be. I should have known, reading the book, really. But everything you’ve said speaks to your level of intelligence and knowledge on this subject and how far you fought into it.

 

So it’s been an absolute pleasure and I think the book is an easy recommend for anyone, really. But thank you for being on here and I appreciate it. And go and buy the book, guys.

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, I’ll just try. Mean, I wrote that down, too, Natty, about his IQ, because I’m suspicious that he’s got levels of Keith Wood’s IQ, but he’s more relatable for me anyway. Definitely! I love the book. It’s my favourite.

 

Now, how many have we done? And I love them. I love quite a lot of them, but this is one that I find very, very important that everybody read it. He focuses on solutions and counter tactics as well as explaining how the current agenda works, works, and he does it all in a relatable way. I learnt a lot, also reflected on how it’s been done to my generation and the other generations of my children. I’ve learnt so much from it. I can’t recommend it enough and yeah, definitely. I’ll go and write a review. I might buy a couple more to give away. It’s that good a book. It’s really impressive. Please write some more.

 

Another one. I’m going to put Mark on the spot now. Please invite this guy on to PWR. He’s just too good to let him go.

 

I don’t know if you have a

Mark Collett: I think that’s what I was getting at earlier, Sally, when I said that it was wasted to simply have him on the book review because he’s been so good!

 

Aunt Sally: Sorry, I pre-empted you there.

 

Student X: All right.

 

Aunt Sally: Anyway, but just saying, everybody buy this book, please. It’s a diamond of a book. It’s really. It’s worth its weight in gold. I think someone said it’s only $6 on Amazon. It’s really worth buying.

 

So thank you, Student X, for coming on the show. We never know when we get an offer because some of them are really, especially when it’s the first book, some of them are frightened we’re going to. We’re going to be awful or. And some of them just aren’t very talkative. And it’s just so nice to have someone who knows his stuff and is able to just speak about with so much enthusiasm and written such a brilliant book.

 

So it’s been great. It’s my favourite one, I think so, even though I’ve not said much, as usual.

 

Anyway, I’ll go. But thank you. Thank you so much!

 

Mark Collett: Thank you very much, Anthony. I’m going to give my final say. Maybe I was wrong about this because I said it was sort of a book for specifically one group of people, but an Sully got a lot out of it and it is extremely well written. It’s got some great debating skills in there. It’s one of those books that if you pick it up, it will teach you maybe nothing new in terms of some big reveal on an ideological level, but it will teach you an awful lot when it comes to how to approach these topics in public. And I like these books because they are practical. And practical things are useful. You can spend hundreds and some people spend thousands of hours listening to podcasts, listening to productions which deal with issues on an ideological level. But very rarely do they teach you how to frame an argument so that normal people understand it and so that those who enforce rules against us are stopped in their tracks. And this book does that.

 

So if you want to think of it as a book, that’s great! But you could also think of it as a shield. If you will as a defensive tool that you can use to essentially turn back the fire that is breathed at you by the anti-White dragon.

 

So if you are in an institution and it might not be a school, or a university, could be a workplace, you could be advocating, as Sally rightfully said, not even think of this on behalf of your children or your grandchildren. This book is, as I said, it’s not that ideological book that explains it all the people behind it, but it is the book that gives you the arguments and the common sense and easy to understand ways to frame a rebuttal to the things used against White people on a daily basis in all manner of institutions. And because of that, this is a very, very useful book and I can’t recommend it enough. I will say it is cheap on Amazon. Go and grab a copy. The link is in the description below and it’s been a joy to do this stream. Tonight we’ve got a couple more Superchats. Anti Mattoy gave $25. Thank you for your generosity. He says equal training sounds like an excellent guide to navigating and combating the language games that are relentlessly played on us. Student X mentioned Rhodesia earlier. Can he say something more about what he learnt about how manipulative tactics were used in Rhodesia? Would you like to say something about that, Student X?

 

Student X: Yeah.

 

First of all, thank you all so much for even having me. This has been great and I love having these conversations and helping anyone of our population in any way that I can. Like I said, I do this because it comes from the heart.

 

As far as Rhodesia, you know, from what I’ve investigated, it was the anti-White scripting or the scapegoating of the White population which riled up the other populations to a point where they outnumbered and collapsed that White population and even massacred a big portion of them.

 

And then the instruction was given to the government, do not respond to attacks on White people.

 

Therefore the Whites were left to defend for themselves and they were outnumbered. And that’s the same playbook that is already at work in South Africa. It’s now here in America, it’s now in Australia, it’s in Canada. And I now see the exact same thing, copy and paste strategy being introduced in the UK and in Ireland. So I even have an interview saved to my phone, a video of a young black lady who was in Rhodesia at the time and she spoke about this firsthand. She goes, yeah, this was, this was intentional to word remarks using these tactics because they want to incite violence and retaliation against the White population. Knowing it’ll be overwhelmed, and the government can just stand down, and then the destruction is complete. You know, they walk off with whatever they want, you know, cash be it, or whatever.

 

So also, I did intercept that hate law that was going in Ireland around December and January. I emailed a number of Senators. I emailed the school curriculum committee in Ireland directly because I’m outside of their legal jurisdiction and I can do what Irish people cannot.

 

And I also found that people from Zimbabwe have been installed in Ireland. There’s a lady by the name of Donna Vuma. There’s another guy I came across who was supporting the EFF, the land back movement, and his Twitter listed him as being in Dublin.

 

So the people that are already trained in this scripting, they’ve already used it to destroy a White population on another part of the planet, have been relocated to Ireland, and the laws are being changed in Ireland, or they’re attempting to where the government only protects those populations and the White population or the Irish population. So it’s there. It’s going to happen rapidly. But anything you want to look up on Rhodesia and stuff, I personally have looked up on YouTube. I’ve talked with people in South Africa, maybe like AfriForum or Africon or networks or something like that could tell you because they’re a lot closer there. You know, they probably saw stuff firsthand. But there. This goes back to what you guys said earlier about, can I just move to a White area? Can I run from this? I argue no. This is all planned. It’s all centralised. It’s, you know, multiple supposedly independent countries are all following one playbook, which tells us it’s coming from a centralised location. People who’ve already done it are being relocated through immigration, diversity, Visa programs, whatever. And it’s gonna hit guys, and I’m giving it five to ten years max, so.

 

Mark Collett: Okay. And we’ve got another Superchat. RoryHerbert gave $5. Thank you so much, my friend. He said:

 

“Dear Mark, I just learnt that General Sir Rowley Walker is just been appointed chief of the general staff of the British army. Not only did he go to my old school, but he’s also a member of my old regiment. If you or Natty were in command of the British army, what would you do to ensure its future? Natty, what would you do to ensure the future of the British army?”

 

Natty: At the risk of starting a long discussion that’s not on topic and also FED posting, I think I’ll skip this.

 

I mean, there are some pretty obvious and easy steps you could take but.

 

Mark Collett: I’ve got the best step. Natty.

 

Natty: Yeah, go ahead.

 

Mark Collett: You won’t have even thought of this. What we need to do is pull. Pull all the military R & D, that’s research and development money, and pump it into making a real life gundam. Once we’ve got a fleet of real life gundams, nothing would stand in the way. The UK military forces, it would absolutely shake the world.

 

Can you imagine it? It’d be, you know, where do we go first? You know, not even the not even America and the White House would be able to withstand the firepower of one single gundam. But nobody’s thought of this yet.

 

Natty: I think there’s a good reason for that, buddy. You can keep dreaming.

 

Mark Collett: No, no. If I was. Look, it’s very simple, really, joking aside, because this is the guy Superchatted and we appreciate that. But joking aside, I would definitely. I would definitely do a couple of things that would reform the army and it’d be very, very simple. And without sort of going off, off topic for 30 minutes, you just really need to get back to what makes a proper, professional army a good thing, which is proper training, proper standards and proper discipline. The fact the British military isn’t what it was is largely due to it losing the things that ensured a good intake, vetted that intake.

 

And if you remember, I remember this from when I was a kid. I’m sure Robbie remembers this. I’m sure you do, Natty. But the old British army slogan was be the best. That was it, wasn’t it?

 

Natty: Yeah, we used to have a joke when we were in the army.

 

When I was in the army, it wasn’t be the best, it was be depressed.

 

Mark Collett: Oh, God. Well, be the best was always on the army army advert. And I used to like that slope. And I like the idea that you go through this rigorous selection and the British army would choose the best and then turn them into the best of the best. And we were a professional military nation that had an army that selected for the elite. And the whole idea of the British army post Second World War, the ethos of the British army was, we’re not the biggest, but we punched a so far above our weight. And it was almost seen as if the Royal Marines, and I know the Marines, some people view them as an elite regiment, but they’re not an elite regiment in the same way as sort of the SAS or Special Forces. But the Royal Marines at one point were seen almost on the same level as other nations Special Forces units. And that said a lot about the British army, that we had sort of a regular regiment that was trained to that level, a mass regiment that was trained to that level that the rest of the world feared. And I don’t think we’ve got that anymore.

 

And I think if we started just doing things as we used to, selecting for the best, stripping out the diversity, stripping out the we need women here, we need women there. Oh, look, we’ve got a midget in that unit, but we can’t get rid of him because we had to abolish the height restrictions, you know, same with the police. I was walking through the city centre the other day near where I lived, and there was a police officer, and she must have been under five foot tall and as wide as she was tall.

 

Now, how this butterbean was going to stop anybody committing a crime, I mean, if she’d have tried to chase you’d have probably ended up being dumb for some kind of involuntary manslaughter, because in giving chase, she would have had a heart attack and they’d have blamed you for causing her to give chase. These people aren’t fit for duty. And I genuinely think it’s simple stuff like that that could, you know, people seem to think that because we face big problems, the solutions must be, you know, big and complex, and I simply don’t think they are. And I definitely know somebody’s going to clip that Gundam thing out and make it as if I make it as if that was a serious problem, but it wasn’t. But I’ve kind of always wanted to say that imagine being like, mark, you’re in charge of all the money. What are you going to do with it? And I just say to Natty, let’s get the Gundam programme underway.

 

Natty: I will just. I will just add, I mean, the army. The army is just an institution in this country. Yes, it stands alone, but the problem is where it intersects with politics and who pulls the levers of power in this country.

 

So whether it was the army, whether it’s schools, which is what we’ve been talking about, hospitals, whatever else, where it intersects with this anti-White power system is where you have a problem. The army, the British army itself is probably still made up, mostly professionals, people who are capable of problem solving and getting things done. But unfortunately, like the rest of us, we’re ruled over by people who absolutely hate the native population, so it suffers like everything else.

 

Mark Collett: Agreed.

 

Well, look, that’s the end of the show. Thank you to everyone who Superchatted tonight and we will throw this. Oh, open borders for Israel gave five odds. Can you review the horror cause narrative or The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit by Michael Jones? I’d love to do that. Yeah. I’ll email him. Okay. That’s a good suggestion. I will email him tomorrow morning.

 

So that brings us to the end of the show. Everyone’s highly recommended this book. It’s been a really entertaining stream. I’m sorry about the slightly depressed numbers because the football was on, but it is what it is. Student X, have you got any short final words? Because we’re ten minutes over.

 

Student X: No, just again, thank you all for having me on. It’s been wonderful talking with you. Anyone in our population can reach out to me. If there’s anything I can do to help or if you want to know further have further discussions or whatever, I’m here. I’m on standby, so.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much! Thank you for being on.

 

I will be back next week for Patriotic Weekly Review on Wednesday, and I’ll have my German friend Sasha Ross Muller on with me. People have been asking for a European to discuss what’s going on in Europe. We’ve got one, obviously, the general election next week as well. Stay updated with my thoughts on that and all the latest news on my Telegram and gap.

 

Thank you to everyone who’s been here. Thank you to Natty. Thanks, Ansali. Thanks to Student X. Massive. Thank you to everyone who donated so generously. But the biggest thank you, as always, goes to this incredible community. I love you all.

 

Thank you for being with us and we will see you again next month. It will be for another wonderful book review and I’ll be back on Wednesday. Until then, stay strong. Keep fighting. Thank you so much! Love you all.

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/2/2024 = 89)

Mark Collett
1 day ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

2
0

@Aunt-Sally
1 day ago
It was one of the best streams we’ve done. I highly recommend you listen to it.

12
0
Hide replies

@Mcavoy
1 day ago
Thanks Sally, it was a great show!

3
0
Based and Rempilled
21 hours ago
Thank you Sally.

@LottaSense
1 day ago
great guest

7
0
MagicManintheSky
1 day ago
Weimar Britain

5
0

@Glen19
1 day ago
Those who say that they’re anti-Imperialism aren’t really. They ignore all Non-European imperialism. It’s just a way to attack Europeans not imperialism

6
0

@What3
1 day ago
FINNALLY. Someone in the white dissident sphere who’s smart and gets it! Just got the book.

5
0
Vettekid1488
1 day ago
damnit …I’m getting notifications after the streams are finished

5
0
Hide replies

@Apollo
1 day ago
Same

2
0
Based and Rempilled
21 hours ago
Phenomenal book to have on hand for any parent. It’s entirely moral and I’ve heard of people using it at school board meetings. If you attend I highly recommend it. It’s cheap and effective to help stop antiwhite indoctrination at schools.

4
0
Natty
1 day ago
Check out White Student T. on X. Resource offering a combination of Podcast, tutorials & literature to counter #AntiWhite’s. #White #Student #Learn #College #University #America #Europe #School
https://x.com/WhiteStudentT

4
0

@LottaSense
1 day ago
funny how climate crap goes on and on about nons being displaced while they purposely displace White people from their own homelands

4
0
Hide replies
Vettekid1488
1 day ago
so much projection smh

1
0

@WhiteLightKnight
7 hours ago
Sorry but couldn’t make this live. Not because of sportsball but family commitments. Now listening on replay. Absolutely incredible stream. As usual

@Natty
is making excellent points. Especially why has the word Caucasian disappeared?

1
0

@MississippiCoops
6 hours ago
Just ordered his book. Thanks for introducing me to the author and to all your other guests Mark. Great stream.

2
0
Randy McDowell
6 hours ago
Can’t believe I watched Kalergi FC vs SLOVAKIA over this. Riveting stuff

2
0

@AlbionForever
1 day ago
You used to have to be at least 6ft to be a copper, didn’t you?

1
1
Hide replies
Wizard
22 hours ago
Had to be 6ft 2in to be a Florida State Trooper. Which is highway patrol.

@Rixille
1 day ago
Are there alternative online vendors for this book? I deleted my Amazon account.

2
0

@RoryHerbert
1 day ago
“Rhodesians never die”.

2
0
MagicManintheSky
1 day ago
Jews are not “White”

2
0

@EndJewishPrivilege
1 day ago

@LottaSense
White Genocide by the Juden

2
0

@LottaSense
1 day ago
GREAT STREAM

1
0
MagicManintheSky
1 day ago
Please make this book available at pro-White booksellers.

1
0
Bianca Fights The Zombies
1 day ago
this speaker is so fantastic

1
0
Bianca Fights The Zombies
1 day ago
grassroots, decentralized

1
0
WarpSpeedJudas
1 day ago
The Jews will never just give that up. It must be taken back by force.

1
0

@AprilRainFilly
1 day ago
Would be good to get Student X on a full show – so interesting to hear what’s going on in the US and the parallels with what we are seeing in the UK

1
0
Anti Mattoid
1 day ago
$25.00
Equal Training sounds like an excellent guide to navigating and combatting the language games that are relentlessly played on us. Student X mentioned Rhodesia earlier – can he say something more about what he learned about how manipulative tactics were used in Rhodesia?

1
0

@Glen19
1 day ago

@LottaSense
The climate agenda is a massive scam. The carbon trading system Korea implemented isn’t doing anything to stop climate change

1
0

@Glen19
1 day ago
Japan was doing colonialism in the 1500s in Korea

1
0

@GaelicNord
1 day ago
Saw that yea. She said “EUROPE IS NOT WHITE!” In a loud bantu voice. And all the stupid White shitlibs applauded to her. sickening

1
0

@RoryHerbert
1 day ago
$5.00
Dear Mark, I just learned that General Sir Roly Walker has just been appointed Chief of the General Staff of the British Army. Not only did he go to my old school but he’s also a member of my old regiment. If you or Natty were in command of the British Army what would you do to ensure it’s future?

0
2
MagicManintheSky
1 day ago
^

@RoryHerbert
1 day ago
I still have a friend who is serving in the SBS,

@MarkCollett

@FashyChad
1 day ago
butterbean lol

Bianca Fights The Zombies
1 day ago
get the kindle version for $6

@LottaSense
1 day ago
or maybe that is S&H fees to be sent to where you are?

@LottaSense
1 day ago
omy gosh. gatekeeping it already?

MagicManintheSky
1 day ago
This book is listed at $52 in Australia on Amazon.

@Aunt-Sally
1 day ago
You won’t regret it

@keribou
it really is brilliant

Bianca Fights The Zombies
1 day ago
buy it while you can, can’t trust Amazon

Keribou
1 day ago
have just bought it!

@RoryHerbert
1 day ago
Good evening

@Chief_Moody
Sir.

Chief Moody
1 day ago
Evening troops

MagicManintheSky
1 day ago
Will Amazon allow this to go forward?

Natty
1 day ago

@BIANCA
he really is

@Glen19
1 day ago
Japan has a plan to be net zero carbon by 2050. All it has done is raise electricity prices. I suppose it will make us produce less carbon by forcing us to use less electricity

Hide replies
Vettekid1488
1 day ago
all nations will do this …raise costs for our modern conveniences to ween us off of them

Bianca Fights The Zombies
1 day ago
$6 on Amazon, well worth it

@LottaSense
1 day ago
nothing wrong with strategizing and doing tactics

MagicManintheSky
1 day ago
He wants to do an “end-run” around the Jewish gatekeepers.

@LottaSense
1 day ago
the jews did give that up in america technically. They got a supreme court decision a few years ago that says they are not White

@LottaSense
1 day ago
every time you do something it gets easier- look, you already know the title and chapter names

@LottaSense
1 day ago

@Natty
lol i know its a massive scam! saying “climate crap” was unclear,,, haaa cheers

@Glen19
1 day ago
I think it’s a way to get less developed countries into the global market for more profits.

@Glen19
1 day ago
Its just a redistribution scheme

Natty
1 day ago
of course, and it would be easy to weigh in but ultimately, language and narratives have to be understood as tool and weapons used by certain groups of people in certain ways. it benefits the Chinese government to use that language and narrative

@Glen19
1 day ago

@Natty
In Asia you will hear more complaints about Japanese imperialism than European imperialism. The CCP in particular uses as a foundational myth.

@LottaSense
1 day ago

@EndJewishPrivilege
exactly

Natty
1 day ago

@Glen19
yes, its an example of a cropped narrative

@LottaSense
1 day ago
If you research it, there is nothing benevolent about the Kalergi plan. And it is an actual plan that was put forward by the usual suspect group

@LottaSense
1 day ago
OMMMMG you are so right! I never thought of that before! They are just changing the name of our rights to “privilege”

@LottaSense
1 day ago
but then again, public school employees are teaching the same tactics along with the media

@LottaSense
1 day ago
africans are taught the tactics from day one in africa and then they are shipped into our countries

@Insightful_World
1 day ago
Student X sounds like Mike Enoch

@LaylandSue
1 day ago

@SomeRandomBloke
I second that.

@LottaSense
1 day ago
VERY good point whoever just talked about words as weapons and how White people are conditioned to NOT use words as weapons

@Glen19
1 day ago
$2.00
Natty, I hear you were in the military. Have you checked out the new antelope hill book, The Sixty-Year Caucasian War? I think Russia shouldn’t have conquered the East Caucasus because it cost more in political stability than it was worth. (Russians hate Caucasians more than any other minority)

@EndJewishPrivilege
1 day ago
Perhaps Jonathan Greenblatt and the Knesset should be asked for reparations, considering the jewish role in slavery?

@Glen19
1 day ago
Slavery was the economic model prior to the Industrial Revolution. I would say it held back industrialization. Either way it was going to be made obsolete

@RoryHerbert
1 day ago
:heart:

@Aunt-Sally
xxoo

@LottaSense
1 day ago
ty Natty

@LottaSense
1 day ago
It is very strange when you have children many years apart, to see the differences in society that your children have to navigate.

Natty
1 day ago
Check out White Student T. on X. Resource offering a combination of Podcast, tutorials & literature to counter #AntiWhite’s. #White #Student #Learn #College #University #America #Europe #School
https://x.com/WhiteStudentT

@LottaSense
1 day ago
is Student X/WST on x or gab or does he have a website?

@LottaSense
1 day ago
This guy is amazing

@01123581379
1 day ago
mass deportations must happen or Trump is a traitor

Natty
1 day ago
joe*

Natty
1 day ago
hey jo

Joe Marsh
1 day ago
yo guys

@Aunt-Sally
1 day ago
Hi everyone, won’t be long… just setting up on a borrowed laptop

@Amalek61
1 day ago
All sports ball is GAY!!!

Natty
1 day ago
evening all

@Amalek61
1 day ago
Equal training does not guarantee equal learning

Hide replies

@What3
1 day ago
Not the sharpest tool in the shed i see.

@AprilRainFilly
1 day ago
looking forward to this

Open Borders for Israel
1 day ago
5
can you review the holocaust narrative or the jewish revolutionary spirit by e michael jones and have him on as a guest?

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and welcome to Book Club.

 

Now, it’s been a little while since the last book club, and that’s because we had Easter Sunday, and obviously we didn’t want to be streaming on Easter Sunday because everyone’s spending time with their family, etc. And it was a nice night off, but it delayed this particular episode. But we’re finally here, and we are live tonight on Odysee, DLive, Rumble and Entropy.

 

So you can find us in all of those good places. And tonight we are reviewing The Myth of German Villainy.

 

Now, this is the second edition, so I could only find this edition available in one place, and that’s directly from Money Tree Publishing. And we have Dave Gahary from Money Tree Publishing tonight to talk about the book, because the author has sadly passed away, so he’s going to be the representative discussing the book and discussing the things that have been added to it and why it’s an important book. So he’s taking the place of the author.

 

Now, I would just ask you all a small favour. If you like these streams, if you like the book reviews, if you like the work we do, please consider making a small donation, and you can donate via Odysee or Entropy.

 

And also, you don’t have to donate, obviously.

 

And if you can’t afford to donate or want to help in another way, a great way for you to help us is by sharing the stream.

 

And I think this is a really important stream, and it’s a really good book!

 

And I’m going to throw it over to Dave in a minute because I want him to give sort of the intro. We’re still waiting on Aunt Sally. She’s having a few computer problems, so she might be with us tonight. She might not be, but her computer’s running really slow, so we’ll see if she arrives.

 

But before we get into the book, I want to say something about this.

 

Now, we’ve reviewed, or this is the 31st book we’ve reviewed on Book Club. So we’ve reviewed, you know, 30 books up until this day. And we have reviewed other books that have dealt with the realities, the truths of the Second World War. And you might be thinking to yourself:

 

“Well, Mark, we’ve had a few reviews like this. We’ve covered a few books like this. Why would I want to read this book?”

 

And I’m going to start by saying, I read this book, and there were things in this book I didn’t know.

 

Now, I’m not saying that I am the best read or the most educated when it comes to the historical facts of the First and Second World War. But there were some pretty major things that cropped up in this book that I actually hadn’t heard about. And there was things that I had heard about. And this book allowed me to build on my knowledge and my sort of historical grasp of these events. So I found the book very interesting.

 

[03:07]

 

So if you’re coming into this thinking maybe:

 

“Well, this sounds really great, Mark. This is the kind of book I’d like to read. But what makes this book different from other books like this that you’ve reviewed in the past?”

 

I want to just get that out the way straight away that I enjoyed the book and I always knew I was going to like it. But I didn’t realise what an education it would be for someone like myself who’s been doing this, been in dissident politics for 24 years, who has had, you know, been at numerous meetings where people have talked about things such as revisionism, the Second World War, where there’s been multiple books on sale about the topics that are broached in this book, yet this book still brought new things to the table.

 

So I’m going to start by throwing it over to Dave. Dave is obviously the commander in chief over at Money Tree Publishing, and we always love having Dave on because he’s a very entertaining guy and he does his own show.

 

So basically, Dave, why don’t you plug your own show for a start and where we can find you? Tell us a bit about why the second edition was published, how you got the rights to doing the second edition, and a little bit about the author who sadly passed away. And then we’ll go around the group and we’ll give out our impressions.

 

Dave Gahary: Sure. Sure. Am I coming through loud and clear?

 

Mark Collett: As loud and as clear as a blackbird song in the morning. Absolutely perfect!

 

Dave Gahary: Lovely. We’ve got the mockingbirds down here in the Florida panhandle, and they sing throughout the day and night. So you could hear them at, you know, two, three in the morning, going wild. It’s lovely.

 

Yes, the book.

 

Now, when I was at American Free Press writing for them and the Barnes Review for about ten years, I remember hearing about the book when it first came out, and it just really struck a nerve with a lot of folks and struck a chord. And it was lauded. And I heard that. I had never read the first edition, but it was brought to my attention at a later date by Jim Rizzoli and Diane King, who, as you may be familiar with, they do the Hoaxbusters show over on our network Speak Free Radio, which you can access by going to speakfreeradio.com. And it’s a 24/7 Internet radio network.

 

And I guess it would probably make sense if it’s okay to read the quick note from the publisher that I put in there. Mark, if I could read that.

 

Mark Collett: Of course, my friend, you’ve got the floor, so please feel free to.

 

[06:02]

 

Dave Gahary: Thank you. It says:

 

“This book would not exist if not for the enthusiastic encouragement of Jim Rizzoli and Diane King, two true American patriots. Here’s the backstory after Jim heard a radio show with Benton Bradbury, and he’s the author, of course, on as a guest, Diane was able to get a hold of Ben’s contact information to set up an interview with Jim, which was done in January 2016. After the interview, Diane stayed in touch with Ben, and anytime a hurricane would sweep through the Jacksonville, Florida area, she would call to check on him. The last time she did, Ben informed her, probably in his characteristically matter of fact, no nonsense way, he had esophageal cancer and had about three months to live.”

 

“Seeking to preserve Benton Bradbury’s legacy after his unfortunate passing in 2019, and to give the book a larger audience, Jim and Diane suggested we contact Mister Bradbury’s family to speak with them about the future of the book. They were enthusiastic to keep the book in print, and this second edition, with some corrections and amplifications, is the final result.”

 

“Thank you to the heirs of this book and to Jim and Diane for entrusting us with this task to keep this most important work alive. We hope it meets with your approval.”

 

 

“And that’s it.

 

Mark Collett: Superb.

 

So how did you go about putting together the second edition, then?

 

And I think this fits very well in your library because obviously, we’ve had you on here before. We reviewed Hell Storm, and that was a, I mean, the package you put together for Hellstorm was some interesting, truly special.

 

I think it was one of the first book reviews we did with you, and that package was incredible! Because you guys really, really went out there with not only the fantastic printed edition, but also with the audiobooks and the documentary as well. I think this fits in well with the rest of your library.

 

Dave Gahary: Yes, absolutely! And we’re not going to be adding too many more parts to the library, for the simple reason that we just wanted to focus on what we consider to be the best examples of the particular topics that are being addressed.

 

So this book took, as most books take, a long time to copy edit. And Ben was a former US Navy pilot. He had served in the military for, I think about 30 years. It’s in the actual, About the Author.

 

Let me just quickly get that. Yeah. So he served from 55 to 77. Yeah, 32 years. I’m sorry, I can’t even add! 22 years in the US Navy. And he was born in 1937.

 

Of course, as I said, he passed in 2019.

 

So Ben wasn’t an historian. He was somebody who had visited Germany and was perturbed about what he witnessed up close and personal with the beautiful German people and what the poisonous media was spewing about the beautiful German people and their wonderful history.

 

And so that’s what spurred him on to write a book about this.

 

[10:13]

 

And as you mentioned in the intro, sadly, he has passed. And I, of course, am quite saddened by that because I know we would have hit it off, both being navy guys and both having an interest in this topic. So Ben, again, I wish I would have known the actual steps he went through, but he went through a process of reading a lot of books, as you could see in the bibliography. And he put together a manuscript and self published the book. And it was through another company that self published it wasn’t like money tree or even more traditional publishers. It was a publisher that said:

 

“Well, just give us your manuscript, and we’ll just make it into a book.”

 

So when I dig into a manuscript, or a book, I dig in like a copy editor and a proofreader. So I look at not just every page or every paragraph, every sentence or every word, but every character. And it takes quite a bit of time. Some would say that “analysis is paralysis”, but I can’t do it any other way. Just like if I’m reading a book, I always have a highlighter with me because I instinctively highlight stuff that I’m interested in or highlight errors. And then later, many times contact the author or the publisher and let them know, which they’re very much appreciative of.

 

So I was born with this attention to detail, and I put that to work in Ben’s book, The Myth of German Villainy, the first edition.

 

I think, because, you know, Ben wasn’t trained as an historian, or a writer there were some things that slipped through, some facts that weren’t facts, some quotes that were spurious, some material that needed, as I mentioned earlier, some amplification.

 

And so I went through the entire manuscript along those lines. And the structure of what he wrote is there. That’s not changed. But the errors, maybe the wrong dates or the wrong names, the wrong facts, they’ve all been removed. And some parts of the book that I felt needed to be expanded upon were expanded upon. And photographs and images were added. Whereas the first edition had just black and white photos, some of them not very clear. This edition has a lot of colour photos, and when the actual photo itself or image itself was not in colour, black and white.

 

Amazingly, and of course, I never would have thought it would have turned out this way. But the first edition and the second edition are almost the exact same number of pages! And for all the work that was done on it, that was surprising to me when I discovered that at the end.

 

But this has 171 images. So we offer, let me see if that’s offered in this book. It is.

 

So this book is offered in black and white and colour. And the black and white version has 171 black and white images. And the colour version, out of those 171 images, 123 are black and white, and 48 are a colour.

 

[14:21]

 

So I was very happy with how it turned out. It’s a project like this that goes on for three years. It’s kind of like birthing something, and you really don’t know until the end, at least I don’t, how it’s going to turn out. But I was very happy with the way that it turned out. And I’ve heard from a lot of folks stuff similar to what you said, Mark, that they knew a lot about this topic, but they learnt a lot from reading the book.

 

Mark Collett: Fantastic! Thank you, my friend.

 

Well, let’s go around the group.

 

We’ll start with you, Natty. Obviously, you’ve been here with the book club since the very beginning. What did you think of this book? Did you enjoy it? Give a bit of an overview, please.

 

Natty: Well, like you, in fact, I was looking at Hellstorm as you were giving your preface to the stream here. And this is a topic we do seem to cover a lot, but it’s evergreen, and there’s so much that feeds into us, and there’s a lot of stuff that’s going on in the world at the moment that makes this relevant.

 

And I would argue that World War One and then the lead into World War Two and everything that’s happened since the Second World War is one of the most pivotal moments in the civilisation of Europe and probably the world. And I know it’s easy to say that given that we’re living in a time that is controlled and has echoes of the decisions made then and the events that happen then, because we’re living through it now, but it really does feel monumental.

 

And the Second World War and the lead up to it and the aftermath of it, the immediate aftermath of it, without understanding it, you simply cannot have any logical or coherent narrative of the way the world is today. So revisiting this period in history, to me, is always interesting. And I echo what you said, and I’ve got it in my notes. There’s things in here that I didn’t know. And I’m less well read on this subject than you, to be honest, Mark.

 

But even then, it was a pleasure. Might be the wrong word, but it was a pleasure to read just for that simple reason.

 

Before we get into the heavy stuff, and I know we do this a lot on book club, and we’ve been chastised for it before, but the cover is just so fantastic! Because, …

 

[17:02]

 

Mark Collett: You know what, mate? I’m going to cut across you there. Not only is the cover fantastic, but it has loads of pictures in. And this book, it really commands your attention.

 

And I’m not saying that everything should be a picture book, but that cover made me want to read it. And what kept me going through a lot of it was when I was seeing actual illustrative proof of everything that the book was stating.

 

Natty: Yes, it makes it a much easier read.

 

And in fact, the cover which you can see in the thumbnail to the video, has this kind of long nosed, like, big chinned, be-monicled Nazi officer on it, right? And he’s standing in front of the famous train tracks that lead to Auschwitz.

 

And recently me and my fiance have taken, well, not her so much, me have taken great pleasure in watching films about the Nazis in the Second World War. You know, most of its trash. Some of its slightly more high class, like The Boy in the Striped Pajamas. Schindler’s List is obviously, is the most famous one, but there are tropes [chuckling] that come up in these films over and over again! And you could drink yourself silly playing drinking games, you know, jews raking the sand, barking dogs, Nazi officers screaming about:

 

“Show me your papers!”

 

You know, it’s the same thing in every film!

 

And as soon as I saw this, the cover for the book and this kind of be-monicled demonic old Nazi officer, I was like:

 

“Yeah, it’s very fitting.”

 

So I know there’s heavy stuff in here, but I thought I’d make a comment on that because I think it’s definitely relevant. And like you said, the pictures go along with everything that’s written here. Makes it very easy to get through.

 

Mark Collett: It certainly does.

 

Well, now we’re going to introduce Bill. Sadly tonight it’s Bill’s last Book Club. I thought I’d mention this now. We were going to mention at the end, but now’s as good a time as any. Bill is basically simply just doesn’t have time to do this anymore. And we’ve really enjoyed Bill’s input, and if everyone would like to say a big thank you to him, that would be wonderful!

 

But, Bill, this is your last Book Club. But what a Book Club to go out on, my friend. First, I’d like to thank you for all your hard work, and it has been a pleasure working with you over the years on this particular project. But what did you think of this book? And do you want to give a bit of an overview like Natty did?

 

[19:27]

 

Bill Atheling: Well, thank you, Mark, for your kind words. Yes, this book, when I read through it the last few weeks, it reminded me of my own period going through the so-called “red pill”, because mine feel like I come from – my sins – from an academic background and teaching. And I began close on to 20 years ago, starting to look at and ask questions effectively, and I became interested in different aspects of this particular period. I’d really like to echo what Natty, yourself said, Mark.

 

That period in time is the crux upon which the hammer of the future was hammered out. So it’s absolutely important! And I think for anybody who’s listening who’s not particularly interested or enamored with historical introspection, well, this is a good place to start to actually wake you up a little bit about it.

 

The thing about this period, of course, is that it’s the time when truth really died! And a complete revision, if you want to use that word, is made of historical facts and occurrences. What this book does, of course, is it lays it out in a very clear, concise, readable, accessible way. It’s not written in highfalutin academic style. It’s not written in a low brow style. It’s written in a way that you can read it, you can enjoy it, and you can engage with it presents a lot of facts, a lot of facts which have been erased or are pushed under the carpet.

 

So, yeah, it’s a very impressive piece of work. I agree about the aesthetics of it. The cover is very nice. I love the fact there were photographs and illustrations throughout, backing up everything that was being discussed as well. Very impressive piece of work! Yeah, that’s my initial summary, at least.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you, Bill. We’ve got Sally in tonight. I don’t know whether Sally can hear us. She’s been having computer problems. This will definitely be sorted for next time because she’s got a new computer, but she haven’t had time to set it up. So, Sally, if you can hear us, obviously, if you can’t, we’ll just continue on without you.

 

But if you can hear us, give us a brief overview of what you thought of the book.

 

Aunt Sally: Well, I can hear you, so please just say yes or no.

 

Mark Collett: We can hear you now. But yeah.

 

Aunt Sally: Can you hear me?

 

Mark Collett: Just about, yeah. There’s a little bit of a delay, I think.

 

Aunt Sally: Just quickly, in case I have to leave. Because of [words unclear] this is one of those books that’s up there with the greats that we’ve had. It’s a book I wish I’d had in my childhood in the sixties, because much of what I was being told didn’t make sense. It just didn’t make sense even to a child. You just didn’t ask. You didn’t ask because of everyone was war weary. My parents were war weary, even though my mum was a child during the war, but my dad just about got [words unclear]. Yeah, it’s one of the great books. I read it again with my mouth wide open at some of the things I didn’t [word unclear]. It’s a fantastic book and every boomer should read it, really. They should read it. Yeah, that’s it for now.

 

[23:22]

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you, Sally. I think it’s a really, really good book.

 

And one thing I want to say about this, and this is where I’m going to kick things off, I think this is important when you see, and I do like the cover I do like the cover. I think the cover is a good cover and we have bashed bad covers. But the cover gives kind of this misconception about the book, that it’s all going to be based around World War Two.

 

Now, the first thing I want to say about this book is its not all about World War Two. This actually goes into a huge amount of detail about other topics, about World War One and sort of the origins of these anti-German myths. And some of the information within it, as I said, is stuff that I didn’t actually know.

 

And I’ll read something from the beginning of chapter three, because this really jumped out to me. I’ve actually got the book here in my hands and I’m just flying through this.

 

So this isn’t all just about National Socialist Germany. It isn’t all about the Second World War. It isn’t just sort of a rehashing of Germans did bad things and rounded up jews. There’s a lot of things here that I didn’t know and that give a greater context. Because obviously I know quite a bit about the Second World War. I know a little bit about the First World War, but I didn’t know this. And I’m reading directly from the book, and I quote:

 

“On December 12, 1916, two and a half years into the war, Germany made a peace offer to the Allies to end the war on a status quo ante basis. That is, no one wins and no one loses, no one pays reparations. Everyone just stops fighting and goes back home.”

 

“Germany had never wanted war in the first place. By that time, in the course of the war, Germany seemed on the verge of victory. Her submarine force had effectively stopped the supply convoys coming from America to Britain, creating critical shortages of all war material in Britain. France had already lost some 600,000 men in the battles of Verdun and the Somme, and the French soldiers were beginning to mutiny. The Italian army had collapsed completely, and Russian soldiers were deserting in droves and returning home. Germany appeared to be winning on both fronts, but the slaughter had been too great, and the British and French were unwilling to stop fighting short of victory.”

 

“The only way to justify the carnage and horrific loss of life was to fight on until victory could be obtained.”

 

“Moreover, as explained in the previous chapter, Britain had entered the war to destroy Germany as an industrial and commercial rival, and that remained her goal. British leaders were determined to find a way to break the stalemate and win the war. And they knew one sure-fire way of doing so was to bring America in on their side. A relentless effort was already underway to bring that about, but so far without success.”

 

[26:30]

 

And this goes into basically the jewish role in the First World War, which is very, very interesting indeed! But I didn’t know that when Germany were on top in the First World War that they had actually said:

 

“Look, we can win this, but there’s a huge loss of life here and we want peace, and we don’t want any more of our young men being slaughtered.”

 

And that, to me, was this sort of nugget of information that completely changed my perspective on the First World War and I’m sure would change the perspectives of many other people. And I hope those listening tonight will hear stuff like this and be like:

 

“Wow! That’s really interesting!”

 

Because I said I didn’t know that. And that’s something I drew from the book.

 

Now I’m going to throw this over to Dave first, and we’ll go around the group and talk about this. But Dave, when you put this together, have you had any similar feedback to that? Because this is a lot more of a broad topic than the usual sort of post Second World War, you know, revisionary material, which is all based around, really a couple of the larger concentration camps and based on whether they were actually concentration camps or death camps, and then disputing figures based on facts.

 

But this is a lot deeper than that, isn’t it?

 

Dave Gahary: Yeah, it is. And let me say that I too, of course, learnt tons from this book.

 

So it’s not like I went in and knew it all and said:

 

“Oh, let me find the errors and the misspellings and fix them all and make it better!”

 

No, I learnt a lot as well, and that was one of the parts that I really was not strong on, and I’m still not strong on it. I’m not, like you said, I’m not someone who knows everything about one topic. It’s virtually impossible to know that. But we can learn as much as we can, of course.

 

So, yeah, that was an important part of understanding the whole story about, or what we think might be the whole story about how Germany felt, the government of Germany felt at that time and what was happening, how they did appear to be on top.

 

And of course, that’s where the whole “stab in the back” comes in. Because how could it be that the Germans lost when they were winning on all fronts? Until, of course, the machinations that were occurring behind the scenes with that wildcard of what I call “organised international jewry”.

 

[29:16]

 

Mark Collett: Thank you.

 

Now, throwing this over to Bill. Bill is a very modest man, and he’s actually had a very high profile academic past. He’s a man who is very well read, and he’s a man who certainly knows his stuff. I’m going to throw this over to you, Bill. This book was Illuminating to me, and I’m not for one minute going to suggest I am as well read as you are.

 

But was there anything amongst this that sort of stood out and taught you something? And what did you think of the structure of the book? Because I think there is a misconception about these books, that they are just going to be sort of going over the well trodden ground.

 

And as I said this, for me, a lot of it was absolutely new ground. That was fascinating!

 

Bill Atheling: Yes, absolutely!

 

And I think the way that the book builds up to the main thesis, the discussion at its centre, is by, as you say, laying the groundwork and touching upon areas which are outside of the central part of the 20th century, the late 1930s, 20th century build-up, and absolutely pertinently relate to that culmination that occurred.

 

It’s a bizarre thing, you know, that you mentioned there about, and Dave mentions about the Germans were on the top of their game at certain points. And actually, both times, both the First and Second World War, Hitler did the same thing when he conquered France. He turned back to Britain and said:

 

“Look, I don’t want a war on this front. This isn’t what I’m about.”

 

Offered generous peace terms, even proposed defending the British Empire, and, you know, he was spurned.

 

So these are things which, when I first encountered them, I thought:

 

“Well, you know, this can’t be right.”

 

And when you start looking at the actual facts of it, it’s there in black and white. It’s there and it’s evidence. You know, I refer to someone like David Irving, who’s someone who have read quite, quite deeply. And he did this, you know, “heinous” thing amongst historians. Instead of going to other historians and quoting and referring to what they were saying, he actually went and looked at source documents and looked at the facts of the original from the period and presented those things. And it tells, it paints a completely different picture.

 

So I think that’s one of the significant things about this book and some of the books that are out there. But why this book particularly should be widely read, because it lays those grounds, those facts out.

 

And as I said earlier, these are some of the things which, when I first began to be reckoned were really important to me, was if there’s a fiction that’s being perpetuated here and that’s being blown out of the water, as is evidenced by this information, what else am I being told that isn’t true?

 

So it begins the whole process, and it’s like a flower opening and you see all the petals. Yeah. So just again, I mean, I don’t think there was anything specifically in this book that I thought:

 

“Oh, I didn’t know that!”

 

Only because I’ve had my nose in this topic for such a long time. But this book brings it all together in a very succinct and clear and concise way and presents it in a structured and deliberate ladder of information that you can follow to reach some kind of understanding of the events and truth.

 

[33:01]

 

 

Mark Collett: Thank you. Sally, if you’re still with us and you’re still able to hear us, you summed it up perfectly earlier, saying, if every boomer read this, it would have sort of changed the world. How much of this was new to you?

 

Aunt Sally: How much of it was new to me? Yeah, I’m here. A lot of [word unclear] was the propaganda that the war generation grew up. Sunday afternoon, there’d be a film on TV, a black and white film. And it was all about the concentration camps and the war and how noble the British were and how evil the Germans were. [words unclear] That’s actually what I would call the book, it’s the other side. The book is the title, because I wouldn’t buy that book if I saw it in the shop. [words unclear] It is the other side of the story, not just the other side to it. It’s why it happened, how things happened, and also the propaganda and deceit, which those [words unclear] what it was and what was going on. Although there were clues, and I would ask questions that they [words unclear] even by my own parents, because they needed to believe the lie, because they suffered.

 

So everybody was invested in perpetuating the myth of lies. They wanted to perpetuate that. So as a child, you were silenced. I hope you heard all that?

 

Mark Collett: We did. We did. Natty, again, you’re somebody who’s very well read. How much of this was sort of new to you? And which bits did you feel were the most Illuminating? Because for me, as I said, it was the sort of First World War was the bits which I didn’t really have full knowledge of, …

 

Natty: Yeah, well, the First World War, again, is this like massive conflagration, that had world changing impacts in the aftermath of it.

 

But again, it pales, given what happened in the Second World War, it’s become less important, especially given the direction of Western countries, Europe, the United States, Australia, South Africa. So less is said about it. But given what actually happened and the aftermath of the First World War, it’s certainly something that when you start saying to people:

 

“Well, if you really want to understand the modern world, you need to look at the Second World War.”

 

And for people in the know, they’ll say:

 

“Well, it’s earlier than that you know, it’s the First World War.”

 

And then, you know, someone will come along and say:

 

“No, no, no! It started with “X”, the expulsion of these people from this, …”

 

Yeah, whatever.

 

[36:29]

 

But the First World War certainly is pivotal. I’m going to read a part of the book here. That talks about the aftermath of the First World War. And Benton says this:

 

“The generalised belief was replaced by a feeling of pessimism and cynicism. There was a feeling that Europe had been profoundly and permanently damaged, a feeling that turned out to be highly pertinent. In retrospect, ancient empires, the Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman, Russian, and German, crumbled as a result of the war.”

 

And I’ll just add, myself, that I think the British Empire suffered because of the First World War:

 

“These empires had been a source of political and social stability, and now chaos reigned throughout Europe. The Paris Peace Conference, after the war, did a very imperfect job of putting it back together again.”

 

“It is clear from the perspective of today that World War One precipitated an irreversible decline in Western civilisation.”

 

So these great empires and great nations of Europe and the control of parts of the world were stable.

 

And then all of a sudden, this kind of mass hysteria, mass propaganda, happens, and we end up killing each other in the millions on what’s known as an industrial scale slaughter, artillery shells and machine guns and gas and all the rest of it. And in the wake of that, the continent is devastated! And what follows from it is all these social changes and all this chaos.

 

I mean, there’s a chapter in here about the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, which is a story into itself. But all of this leads into the Second World War, which probably cements the changes that were on the cards during the First World War. And obviously, this book goes into post Second World War, which is also covered in Hellstorm.

 

And, I mean, there are other books that cover other areas of, you know, expand on things that are chaptered in this book. Like I said, the Bolshevik Revolution. You could read the Gulag Archipelago, maybe, for that. Hellstorm covers the retreat of the Germans from Russia in the east and what happened to the Germans after the war in a little bit more detail. And a lot of, like Bill said, David Irving covers a lot of Hitler and what the Nazi high command was doing at the time.

 

But this book is fantastic! It gives a great overview of things that led up to the First World War all the way through and things that were happening and decisions that were being made that fed into everything that resulted from that conflict.

 

[39:26]

 

Mark Collett: Now, looking over this book and having enjoyed it so much, I think the book essentially stitches together a lot of pieces of history, because people often talk about the First World War, the Second World War, but this stitches it all together and also includes information about the Russian Revolution, the Red Terror, the founding or the beginning of the founding of the state of Israel, as well. It covers information about the Balfour Declaration.

 

Now, when I was looking through this and we touched on this earlier, I really, really enjoyed the pictures. And I really, really enjoyed the sort of these annotated. Well, there’s just so many sort of, so many pictures, drawings, pieces of propaganda.

 

And you can see when you look over this book that it draws all these different pieces together, and it allows the reader to see this not as a series of sort of isolated one offs, but as a concerted effort to demonise the German people, and specifically to also demonise nationalism. So Germans became the sort of avatars of, you know, nationalists in Europe, and they were demonised for that to a great degree.

 

And I think people have, you know, seen snippets of this. But to see it all pulled together in one place and to see the people behind it and to see those people named, and often to see pictures of those people sat together, because it’s very easy to give people lists of names. And if you’re new to this, to just be given a list of names of people who are involved is one thing, but to be given an image showing all those people sitting together at a conference arranging these very things, I think, is also incredibly important!

 

And then to juxtapose the information that we’ve been fed about German villainy and place it next to a genuine information about the Red Terror, about the Gulags, I think that places a lot of things in context as well. And this book does a brilliant job of placing everything that people may have been taught or may have heard as separate individual pieces and putting them into a larger context.

 

Now, obviously, when you were editing this, Dave, and putting this together, was that your intention, to bring all this into one place, contextualise it, and ensure that people saw this bigger picture?

 

Dave Gahary: No, I went into the project not knowing what to expect.

 

And like I said, it took about three years. I was interrupted by, of course, my hospitalisation from what is known as Covid for four months. But I jumped right back in it after I addressed another book that we had put out that I had begun before the hospitalisation. But no, I went into it without knowing what to expect. And it just evolved the way that it did.

 

Of course, a lot of time was spent on selecting these photographs and finding the ones that I thought might best represent the text on that particular page. So many hours are spent going through photographs. And Ben did have a lot of photographs of Hitler with children and all of his adoring fans to show how the Germans thought about him.

 

[43:56]

 

Of course, we’re pretty much all familiar with that, and it’s a fantastic thing to look at. But I didn’t want to place an inordinate number of those type of photos in there. I just wanted to, as you all have mentioned, select photographs that were applicable to what was being discussed and perhaps some that we might not be that familiar with.

 

Mark Collett: Bill, obviously people talk about the Second World War as being a critical turning point in the history of Europe, and that’s something we all know. And I often say, I mean, I was at the Awakening Conference in Finland this weekend, and when we talk to anyone about modern Britain and about what is known as liberal democracy, that is something that has essentially grown post Second World War. We look back and we say the Second World War cemented all this, and in many ways it did.

 

But I think this book puts into context that the plans for this liberal democracy and the sort of taking away of the power of indigenous Europeans, those wheels were set in motion a long, long time before the Second World War even broke out. And this book really placed that in context for me. How would you approach that?

 

Bill Atheling: Yeah. Yes, I agree. Does that sound better now? I’m not clicking or making strange noises.

 

Mark Collett: No, no, the clicking is gone.

 

Bill Atheling: Yeah. It’s just because I’m an old bugger. Okay. That’s what it is. And I had the cable wrapped around my headphone.

 

You’re absolutely right, Mark. It’s so important that these things are laid out as, rather than being event X happened at this date, event Y happened at this date, and event Z happened at this date. It demonstrates the kind of interlinked and the causality of different events and how they culminated in certain events. And that’s what this book is very good at painting, that picture. But there’s something else, which I think is why it succeeds so well in terms of presenting that kind of mosaic of information. It’s the tone of the writer, and I’m sure Dave had a hand in that, in terms of developing the way that texts work together.

 

But, you know, he says things about, for example, when he talks about communism, for example, he says:

 

“The obvious flaw in communist ideology was that it defied human nature, moreover, it defied common sense.”

 

You know, he says these things in very clear, very concise and demonstrably true manner.

 

And then in the chapter, when he’s talking about Nuremberg, he concludes about the way that the trial was prosecuted:

 

“If these standards had been applied at Nuremberg, all sides would have been guilty of war crimes.”

 

Very straightforward, simple sentence, and underlines everything that’s come before. So he has this ability to say things in a very clear, direct, straightforward way.

 

[47:30]

 

And I think that’s one of the most attractive things about this book, is the prose of the writer himself. I did mention this earlier, but this idea that it is presented in a way which is immediately digestible. And these facts are kind of woven together so that we don’t just see the picking over the carcass of a particular event at a particular specific time, but rather the kind of tsunami that rolled into town in the early 20th century and whose fatal flooding has continued to affect our civilisation ever since.

 

Mark Collett: Sally, how does this place things into context for you? Because, I mean, you and I have known each other for some time now, and it’s one of those things where you do believe that the Second World War was this pivotal moment.

 

But I don’t think people really realise how long these changes were building and how long this plan stretched back even before the First World War.

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, really, the book was a revelation for me. We grew up with so much of it and how righteous we were and how wicked the Germans were. And I felt so guilty already just reading the book. Like when I was a child you looked down your noses on them and you very rarely saw any. But I just so happened to have a [word unclear] as a child, and she was a wicked cow! Real wicked cow! And now I understand why. Yeah, we look down on noses at them, even as early twenties, and if you met a German kraut, we called them “krauts”. And, yeah, I feel guilty. Guilty [word unclear] because I’ve been so deceived. I’ve bought into everything that I’m taught and grown up with, and the book, [words unclear] it’s a fantastic book!

 

When I read these books for the book club and I write down any questions I have or something to make sense, but when I did write down [words unclear] and the question within two or three, it answers everything that you ever wanted to know. If I just answered your question mark. But the yeah, the book is a revelation. Other people, other boomers should read it. Well if you could convince someone to read it, but then the title would put a lot of the boomers off. It is such a such a good book. I’m still flabbergasted by it!

 

And I read it a couple of months ago. It really is. And, yeah, I’ll pass now.

 

Mark Collett: Natty, what’s your thoughts about the way this pulls everything together? And then we’re going to move on to a slightly different topic that I think is very important.

 

[50:58]

 

Natty: Yeah, it’s a well presented narrative.

 

I mean, I’m happy to move on. You guys have covered everything that’s you’ve said about the way this book’s presented.

 

I will say this. It’s one thing to hear about propaganda against Germans in the First World War and the early in the outbreak of the Second World War and the times in between. And propaganda today looks a bit different and is more sophisticated.

 

But there are pictures in here of and they’re drawings. They’re not photographs, obviously, this is back in the First World War, where photographs would have been prohibitively expensive. But pictures of German soldiers bayoneting babies or crucifying allied soldiers to trees in the First World War, or dragging women off when they’re marching through Belgium to whip up this frenzy of hate against German people. Whereas that just hadn’t existed before on the outbreak of the First World War.

 

It’s almost like a switch is flipped, and all of this stuff gets produced, and all of a sudden, without any., … You know, you’ve got to remember this is a time without Internet. No counter narrative was available. All of a sudden, people., … And, it’s hard to know how suckered in by this people were or how much control there was and whether people were resistant to this or not. I’m sure a lot of people would have been, but simply there was no voice for that kind of dissent. Although maybe I’m wrong about that. And you could look into archives and newspaper cuttings and find journalists and newspapers who were sceptical of these claims of the evil of Germany. But just all prevailing, all pervasive and totally.

 

I don’t know, it’s crazy to think about how effective but crude that propaganda was and how different it is to propaganda from today. But I’m happy to move on. And I know I haven’t really answered your question, but to see it in the illustrations in this book is something else, really impressive.

 

Mark Collett: Well, you’ve kind of taken me on to the topic I wanted to speak about next, because we’re coming up to the hour and we’ve got some Superchats. If people do want a Superchat, please do consider sending a small donation. If you want to say something about the book or ask any questions to the panel.

 

But I will say this, reading this book in the current context of the modern geopolitical struggles going on in this very moment was very, very interesting. And it was very, very interesting because at the moment, there are two conflicts. There is the conflict in the Ukraine, and there is the conflict in occupied Palestine.

 

And as you flick through this book, you see some, well, images and words and phrases and propaganda that alludes to a certain picture of Germans, and the Germans were obviously the enemies at this time.

 

So you see pictures of Germans pretending to be normal soldiers as they stand over the bodies of women that they’ve just mutilated. You see pictures of German nurses who apparently would rather pour water on the floor than give it to a wounded allied soldier. There are pictures of Germans bayoneting children or walking or marching with children impaled on their bayonets. There are pictures of Germans crucifying allied soldiers or dragging away girls set to the background of villages or towns on fire.

 

[55:26]

 

So the Germans are all always portrayed as these murderous brutes who not only are almost sort of like Orcish, if you were to put it into sort of a the writings of Tolkien, these are sort of Orcs, and Orcs in Tolkien’s writings are absolutely inhuman! You know, they don’t think like us. They’re not like us, and they should never be treated like us. They’re a different breed, a different creature. And that’s what Germans were sort of written up like.

 

But if you take all of that and you look at the propaganda surrounding both the conflict in the Ukraine and the conflict in occupied Palestine, it’s almost amazing, because, you know, from the First World War, we’re now over 100 years on from the end of that war. But the propaganda used to make Britons and the other allied nations hate the Germans is almost identical to the propaganda we see today around the war in the Ukraine and Israel’s wholesale genocide of the Palestinian people, which is incredible!

 

So you hear today about Palestinians butchering babies, you know, roasting them in ovens, and every day, the number of babies that were apparently either beheaded or carried off, you know, grows. But that’s exactly what the same people were saying about the Germans.

 

Natty: And we’re supposed to believe that Russian soldiers today, who are fighting on the front lines in Ukraine, if given the opportunity, would storm across Europe and kill us all in our beds and subjugate us to the most terrible tyranny and also believe that Palestinians hate us for some ridiculous reasons that were never solidified.

 

And like I said, sometimes the propaganda is crude, and sometimes it’s sophisticated. But you see this whole network of today, these supposedly Right-wing influencers and stuff like this, trying to reinforce these narratives as in some cases, more heavily favouring Israel, and in some cases, on the Left or progressive side, more favouring the Ukrainians [Palestinians].

 

But in both cases, we’re supposed to believe that people who have nothing to do with us and don’t know us from Adam, are kind of eternal enemies and are ontologically evil and would do terrible things to us, given the opportunity. And it’s simply not true! And it wasn’t true of the Germans, either.

 

But it’s the same propaganda machine, the same people telling us these things, and it’s ridiculous! As soon as you start to scratch beneath the surface and look at the realities of conflict and land and control and governments and policies, it’s just absurd on its face. Palestinians don’t hate me. Why would they? They probably hate my government. Russians don’t hate me and don’t want to take over my country. They’re engaged in a kind of empire expansion, or a quest to take back natural resources.

 

These are questions that are answerable, and there’s questions, and there’s policies like that that revolve around the First World War and the Second World War. But to expand it into people being evil enough to do something that is kind of almost religiously bad, is just insane! And it’s insane to anyone who’s capable of making their brain cells fire more than you need just to watch the new Netflix, you know, series or whatever.

 

[59:31]

 

Bill Atheling: You’re right, Natty. And, it’s absolutely what you’ve said there is spot on! It’s an absolute case of “Plus Les choses changent, plus elles restent Les mêmes”. The more things change, the more they stay the same. And there is that historical echo. The same fallacies are trotted out, and the same number of people believe them, unfortunately. These things are., …

 

There’s an example of the power of this propaganda is, if I can just deviate very slightly, but there’s a Welshman, a writer called Arthur Machen*, who wrote a story called The Bowman, in 1914. And it’s a fictional story about how, during an attack at Mons, Agincourt bowman arrive and shoots spectral arrows into the air and stops the German advance and so on.

 

[* Arthur Machen (3 March 1863 – 15 December 1947) was the pen-name of Arthur Llewellyn Jones, a Welsh author and mystic of the 1890s and early 20th century. He is best known for his influential supernatural, fantasy, and horror fiction. His novella The Great God Pan (1890; 1894) has Garnered a reputation as a classic of horror, with Stephen King describing it as “Maybe the best [horror story] in the English language.” [2] He is also well known for “The Bowmen”, a short story that was widely read as fact, creating the legend of the Angels of Mons. Source: Wikipedia]

 

And people believed this story, that it was published in the press, and it was published as a piece of fiction, but people implicitly believed it.

 

And in fact, Machen would receive letters saying:

 

“What was your source? What happened? How did you find this information?”

 

He got a letter from a clergyman about this, and he had to say to the clergyman:

 

“Well, no, it’s a piece of fiction.”

 

And to the point where the clergyman wrote back to him and said:

 

“No, you’re mistaken. It’s real. It must be real! What’s your source?”

 

So this is the problem you have with propaganda.

 

Mark Collett: Does Dave, or well, Sally’s not commented yet. Sally, would you like to say anything about this? Because I’m going to ask Dave a few questions in a second. Sally, what are your thoughts on this?

 

Aunt Sally: About?

 

Mark Collett: Yes, about propaganda.

 

Aunt Sally: Well, as far as propaganda is concerned, I think I realised that what the telly told you was a lie, and I cancelled my TV licence and actually haven’t watched TV since. And I stopped consuming mainstream [word unclear] or buying and reading their news. Sometimes I keep an eye on what’s going on, or what they are, but I know now, and I’ve known for a few years, and probably that’s the difference, that are still people believing it.

 

Yet the power of propaganda is, it’s deceit, isn’t it? It’s just all about deceiving you into going with what they want you to believe. And the war generations they were invested in it. And that they invested their lives, [words unclear]. Would have been awful for them to realise the truth! It really would. So they had to invest in the propaganda, and [words unclear] Russians, and it was a righteous war, and the Germans are evil. They needed that. Otherwise, if they realised what they’d really done., … And they’re all dead now, aren’t they? It goes to the next generations, if they ever find out.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you. Dave?

 

[1:03:05]

 

 

Dave Gahary: Yes.

 

Mark Collett: I mean, obviously, you do your own show and you publish many books. Do you think this book, at this point in history, is something that carries a more pressing message because of this? I mean, I think we were discussing this briefly before the show and whether we were going to go into this.

 

And obviously we have got here, and I was thinking about it as we were talking about generally what the book was about.

 

But I do think the issues in this book today are as relevant as they ever were. And how do you view this? Because, I mean, ultimately, they’ve been telling exactly the same lies now for almost a century. Well, for over a century.

 

Dave Gahary: Right. Yes. And that actually is., … Well, before I say that, just let me say that I’m floored by all of your comments about how much you love the book, because, as I mentioned, I poured a lot of work into it, and it’s great to hear that, especially from this group, that you all loved it! So thank you. Means a lot to me.

 

And Tom Goodrich of Hellstorm, he wrote the foreword. As you know, I wanted to mention that earlier, and the cover was done by a close colleague of mine, Paul Angel from the Barnes Review, an American Free Press, we have worked together for going on about 20 years, and he’s a terrific guy. And it took us a while to come up with this cover. It was one of those covers that we really weren’t quite sure about which direction we would go in. And this was what we settled on, and I think it came out very well.

 

But as far as this topic and how it relates to today and what you and I, Mark, had touched upon briefly was that with all of the stuff happening since we first talked about doing this book review, it’s almost like the discussion of a book like this, a historical book like this, would be viewed as something pedestrian or staid.

 

[1:05:34]

 

Maybe the main attraction that I have to history is what you had touched upon earlier is that everything’s the same. And the reason that everything’s the same, I think, is that people don’t change. One could read The Iliad and The Odysee, written thousands and thousands of years ago, and it’s almost as if you’re hearing about something that occurred in your life in the current day, because human nature doesn’t change!

 

And I think a book like this is very important, as are many other history books, because they reveal that what happened over 100 years ago, the people who were manipulating and deceiving with their propaganda are doing the same exact thing today at a different target.

 

So I think that if someone picks up this book and if it gives them just that, the understanding that there really is nothing new under the sun, that all of this was done before, not just in the 19th and, 200th century centuries, but thousands of years ago, because human nature doesn’t change.

 

So besides giving one the knowledge that I feel is necessary to understanding this particular topic, it also gives the reader the ability to get a greater grasp on human nature and how that stays constant throughout the ages. So, yes, I think that although we are confronted with currently much, much different challenges than you might read about in The Myth of German Villainy, they are all tied together and they can’t be separated.

 

In fact, it might be that someone gaining the knowledge of the propaganda and manipulation that took place during the First World War and the Second World War and continues to take place via the you know, there’s plenty of terms for the media, but, you know, one of one of my recent favourites is the “lying legacy media”. The lying legacy media, I think, is really the biggest culprit for the dumbing down and kept in the dark propaganda for the public. And that ties into people like us who are looking for answers outside of what the lying legacy media is spewing.

 

People like us are in the stark minority. You know, I refer to people like us as mutants because we are not afraid to entertain any thought or idea, whereas the masses, who can’t. If you told them that:

 

“I’ve been looking into the history of this and of World War Two, and I just I don’t think that Hitler was as bad of a guy as they tell us he is.”

 

You know, most people would recoil in horror because of how they’ve been programmed.

 

So these are the people. And I mean, like, 99.999% of humanity cannot entertain an original thought, an original idea. If it goes off course from what they’ve been programmed, they are going to have a violent reaction to it.

 

So I don’t think we can wait. And I’m going a little off topic here, but I think it ties into it.

 

But I don’t think we could wait for them to catch up to us. I think we just have to steam ahead and try to get the important information, like we’re talking about today, to as many open minds as possible.

 

[1:10:18]

 

Natty: I just want to push back on that a little bit, Dave, because I think that after October 7 [2023, Hamas attacking the Israelis] and for Americans, maybe a little bit more so, the amount of money that’s being sent to Ukraine, I think that people are becoming more receptive to jewish power or jewish over representation and nepotism in a way that I haven’t seen before.

 

And I’m not sure. Maybe you’re going to tell me:

 

“No, this is a cycle. And people go back to, …”

 

Dave Gahary: No, I agree with you 100%. Absolutely! Yeah, 100%. As a matter of fact, I predicted what would happen in 2022. I thought it was going to happen in 2020, but then they rolled out that Covid thing.

 

But in 2022, I predicted that 2023 would be our best year and, 20024 would be even better than that. And the reason I did was because I saw things happening. And at the time I said that in 2022, none of my colleagues agreed with me, none saw it.

 

And I’m not saying that I’m some kind of a seer and that I have great, you know, predictive abilities, but I did see it. And it was obvious to me because of what was happening, how people were responding, the comments that were, in posts.

 

And I’m not an “anti-social media” guy or social media guy, which I call “anti-social media” because that’s what it is. I’m not a social media guy. But I did see a post that somebody brought to my attention on X. And it was this vampire like character from the ADL, Greenblatt, who, you know, had spewed some filth about Leo Frank and saying he was exonerated. And this was the first time I actually read comments on a post.

 

And this was last year, and the post was made in March of last year. And I read every comment. There were about two to 300. And there was only one that said:

 

“My God, I’m jewish! You have to tell these people off!”

 

Something like that. All the rest were saying:

 

“What are you talking about? You guys framed that black guy!”

 

And going on and on. When those sort of opinions are allowed in the public square, which they were and are now, it was very clear to me that there was a huge seismic shift in the understanding of organised international jewry and, of course, that imaginary jewish power. And we are in the middle of a great awakening that has never before happened!

 

And I remember I was talking about it on the show, I do that Mark mentioned with David Duke on Sunday nights, a call in show which allows anybody from anywhere to call in and talk to the good doctor. And I brought that up about this mass awakening.

 

[1:13:39]

 

And, of course, as I mentioned, nobody thought that that was happening, but now everybody sees that it’s happening.

 

And I said to David that:

 

“You must be feeling pretty good, because what you’ve been talking about for nearly six decades is finally people are seeing what’s going on.”

 

But I’ll temper that with saying that the people who are seeing what’s going on are the “mutants”.

 

So these are the ones who are already susceptible to accepting pretty much anything. It’s just that now it’s so obvious that they were like, wow, I can’t ignore this anymore. So I still think that those, the 99.999%, because we’re a very tiny number, our group of mutants, that 99.99% is still bubbled into their lying legacy media programming.

 

But I do think we are in a great awakening.

 

Natty: Sure. Yeah. I do agree with that, and there are a few things to watch out for. I know you say we’re a tiny amount of people, but we for the most part, have remained laser focused on this issue.

 

And I think it really does help. You know, if you could think about motes of dust surrounding us being pulled in and pulled into that laser as well. And there are a lot of distractions. You know, aliens are now apparently a thing, and the Illuminati and, you know whatever else, whatever else can be a distraction.

 

But I think for the most part, people like us in larger ways, like you and your publishing house, and sometimes in tiny, small ways, like us doing this podcast and this book review, and millions and millions, which is small in the grand scheme of things. People on places like Twitter and on social media sharing memes and ideas and talking and being dissidents, is forcing people who are trying to hold the tiller into swinging very slowly in this direction.

 

And to make another point, there are so many inroads into this now. Like I said, the liberal progressive people are suddenly finding out that Israel and the jewish power structure has carved out an exception to, if not genocide, ethnic cleansing at the very least. And they don’t like it. And now they have this inroad into:

 

“Well, why is there this exception?”

 

And they start asking questions like that. And it’s only going to lead to one place. And for the American Right, for the kind of the much lauded and shat upon boomers, their money, their tax money is being sent to Israel like never before, and the Ukraine, which for those people is a country on the other side of the world, but shouldn’t be receiving their money.

 

So all of these otherwise disparate groups are being forced to look into this issue and confront it and start asking questions if they have any desire to enact some sort of political change. Which I know is extremely hard, and we all know that here.

 

But I don’t think it’s not nothing. I’ll say that.

 

[1:17:17]

 

Dave Gahary: No, no, it’s not. It’s something.

 

But I think we’re at a point now, and I’ve mentioned this several times on shows in private and publicly, that we can literally kick back a little bit because now the unhinged Left is doing our job for us. And we see that happening.

 

So it’s a great time to be alive because all of the stuff that we focused on, in our group, if I can call it that, is the most educated group out there, because again, it goes back to not being afraid to entertain any idea or thought. So we are interested in learning. We want to dig into things. And yes, there are a lot of distractions. Flat earth, aliens, the Illuminati, Hitler was a Rothschild, all that stuff.

 

One of the things that keeps me going is that I feel like I do have that. And I’ll borrow your term “laser focus” on what I’m trying to do. And I don’t let this stuff distract me. And I don’t., As Sally was saying, I don’t watch television. I haven’t watched it since 1991, when my first son was born. I have no interest in it. I have no interest in the jew’s media, or whatever you want to call it. I tangentially look at it, but I know what they’re going to say, of course.

 

So the good news is that media is dying! But you’ve got people like Joe Rogan and his ilk who refuse to, or are unaware of what is really happening, and they don’t go to that next step.

 

So I really think that people like us, it is an incredibly small, minuscule group, but it’s those small groups who have changed history.

 

I mean, I’ll use, you know what you all created, your ancestors created this nation here. And it was only about 8,000 Patriots with a capital “P” who were organising the rebellion against their British overlords. Because of what we mentioned earlier, taxation without representation, nothing has changed. They went against all the odds to defeat the greatest empire in history. So I’m certainly not saying that we cannot win. If I woke up every day and sat down at my desk and thought that I wouldn’t wake up, I just give up.

 

So I have high hopes. I think that in America, we’re taught that, or at least we were when I grew up – I was born in 1960 – that anybody could be the president.

 

Unfortunately, we’ve seen that happen. Anybody could do anything that they want to do. I’m a firm believer in that. I’ve experienced that. I’ve done things that I still can’t believe I’ve done them. I don’t think it was myself doing. I think I had help, but I think that we can do anything. And if we don’t think that way, we sell ourselves and those around us short!

 

And I think we should all believe that we can achieve victory.

 

And I believe that we can!

 

[1:21:20]

 

Mark Collett: Thank you. Some inspiring words there, Dave.

 

So this is the part of the show where I really want to throw it open to Bill, Sally and Natty. I’ve done a lot of speaking. Are there anything, is there anything in the book that you guys would like to particularly focus on or bring up or anything about the book that you think I’ve missed or maybe something in the book that was missed? So, Bill, is there anything you’d like to bring up?

 

Bill Atheling: Well, I don’t know whether it’s something that you might have missed, but there’s a particular quote in chapter 13, which is by an English Daily Express reporter, and it’s quite a lengthy quote. But it’s very interesting as an insight into how Germany was perceived in the thirties before things swung around.

 

So, for example, this is six months after Germany’s militarisation and the incursions of the Rhineland and a month after the Olympics. And he writes things like this:

 

“There is, for the first time since the war, a general sense of security.”

 

Speaking, obviously, about Germany:

 

“The people are more cheerful. There is a greater sense of general gaiety of spirits throughout the land. It is a happier Germany. I saw it everywhere. An Englishman I met during my trip and who knew Germany well, were very impressed with the changes.”

 

And he goes on to say:

 

“It impressed me more than anything I witnessed during my short visit to New Germany, a powerful revivalist atmosphere, an extraordinary effect in unifying the nation.”

 

And then he goes on to say about all the different types of Germans who have brought together, Bavarians and northerners and so on.

 

Natty: Wait, Bill, can you imagine anybody walking around England today and asking any Englishman and getting that impression? I don’t think so.

 

Bill Atheling: Absolutely! Absolutely! And there’s this sense that we have this lens that has been calcified in the years since 1945, and that was still fluid and it was still moving before that period. And but we still have documentation like this to look at and to access and say:

 

“Well, actually, there was this idea that there was this, you know, we’re showing all the television dramas and films and movies, and there’s the coming storm and all this kind of thing, and everybody’s gloomy, and everyone thinks that there’s a terrible evil rising in the east.”

 

And it’s just not the case. There isn’t this kind of Sauron like monster rising in the east. You know, people didn’t see it in that sense. This is a post-war painting. And just looking at things like that, just looking at that, just very simple series of quotes from that particular period really underlines that.

 

[1:24:16]

 

One of the things which when I was teaching, I used to say to students before lectures was “question received wisdom”. That sounds in some ways to be a negative thing. You say:

 

“Well, you don’t question tradition and so on.”

 

But actually, we were getting students, kids who had done A levels and so on.

 

Their minds had been so constricted and narrowed that all of a sudden I was saying to them:

 

“Well, actually, no, you can question this. You’re allowed to question this. There’s these narratives.”

 

And I would try and red pill them and show them things and talk about things, and to a degree, got across to them that, it’s okay to actually question these narratives that we’ve been fed because I mean, the classic one thing I said was:

 

“When we’re looking at history, we are allowed to question all kind of interpretations of was Henry VIII the good king? Was Henry the bad king? And so on. But there’s one period in history we’re not allowed to question, and why do you think that is?”

 

You know, so I just pose questions to them and leave them to think about, to cogitate a little bit on that. And that’s what this book does in the sense it kind of breaks through that calcification and allows that kind of marinade in information which wouldn’t normally be denied to them.

 

And I think coming back to what Dave and Natty were saying about the propaganda war and in terms of the shift, we have this thing, the Internet, and as constricted and as restricting as it has become, in some ways, we’re streaming on Odysee and not YouTube, for example.

 

At the same time, it’s a barrel with too many holes in it, and they can’t plug all the leaks.

 

And so I think what this book does is it provides buckshot to knock through some of those barrels and let some of the water out.

 

Mark Collett: Sally, is there anything about the book that you think I’ve missed or anything that you’d like to bring up?

 

Aunt Sally: Right. My dog might bark because there’s a fox outside.

 

There is. I mean, for me, the thing, I just keep thinking about mine [words unclear] and I think I’ve covered it already. I don’t want to repeat myself, but we weren’t taught about the war. We were given films on [words unclear] no one talked. The parents didn’t talk about it. The school didn’t talk about it. And I grew up why the war happened? And I used to ask my father:

 

“Did you go to war to save jews?”

 

That’s what I thought they went to. He didn’t really answer me, but I presumed it. So I thought it was about saving the jews. I had no idea, even till.

 

And this book, it’s just all there and I can’t recommend it enough. It’s such an eye opener. It explains every little thing. I wish I’d had it, you know, when I was a child. It would have. [words unclear] Yeah, well, I’ve just written down, we were brought up in total ignorance, that generation. And to go forth, and my father used to say:

 

“Go! We had to suffer. Enjoy it. Enjoy your life!”

 

And I think that was the case for all the boomers:

 

“Go forth, because we never had any [words unclear] go forth and enjoy the world.”

 

Because our parents and our grandparents, … So that’s me making excuses for the boomers, although I know that they’re kind of irredeemable, but they don’t know what I know. Yeah, I’ll stop now, Mark.

 

[1:28:45]

 

Bill Atheling: Well, you’re quite right, Sally.

 

And I think and I speak to my dear old mum, who’s in her eighties, and then she’s got a very fixed eye idea of that period in history and, you know, won’t move on it in many ways. But that generation is the old generation, and that’s very different amongst Zoomers and so on.

 

I think there’s a very different attitude that’s growing now.

 

Mark Collett: So, Natty, is there anything in the book that you think was missed out or anything you want to add to what we’ve said tonight? And then we’ll do the Superchats.

 

Natty: Well, there’s loads in here that I don’t think we’re going to get round to, namely the Katyn Forest massacre, which I think you’ve done a podcast, or a standalone video yourself, Mark, and I think was covered in Hellstorm. It’s not famous, normie wise, but it’s fairly well known on the Right, so maybe it’s not worth going into. But I will just note that initially the allies blamed the Germans for the Katyn Forest massacre, in which something like 26,000 of the Polish, the elite, the kind of cream of Polish society, a cream of Polish men, officers and educators and teachers and stuff, were executed, turned out to be the Bolsheviks.

 

The second thing, this book also goes into Dresden, which we’ve covered before. I know we’ve covered before, which is probably one of the worst war crimes, minus, if you set aside Hiroshima and Nagasaki, one of the worst war crimes, I think, to come out of the Second World War.

 

But one of the things I wasn’t aware of which I’m not sure if this was covered in Hellstorm, if I’ve read it somewhere else. I don’t think I have. Was the jewish Brigade. And, Dave, you probably know about this. Mark, I’m not sure if this was something you’re aware of but essentially the book says this:

 

“There was a jewish infantry brigade group, more commonly known as the jewish Brigade, that not many had been aware of a military formation of the British army. It was formed in late 1994 [1944].”

 

It goes on:

 

“Using their British army credentials and uniforms, they travelled around Germany (this is after the war) and Austria, hunting down and killing high ranking German officers. They had unlimited logistical support from the British army, could requisition anything they needed and travelled anywhere in Germany or Austria. They had all of Germany’s official records, which the allies had given them, obviously.”

 

[1:31:36]

 

And these guys were, like, hell bent on executing people just for being in charge of groups of soldiers. There’s a quote here:

 

“One of the jewish executioners, Israel Kami, explained in Beckman’s book how they dealt with their selected targets. When we arrived at the home of our suspects, we were put on British military police helmets, wore white bands and police armlets. Then we would enter the home and take the suspect with us, saying that we wanted them for interrogation. Usually they came without struggle. Once in the car, we told the prisoner who we were and why we took him. Some admitted guilt. (He doesn’t say guilt of what) Others kept silent. We did the job. We were burning with hatred. We knew that our people would never forgive us if we did not exploit this opportunity to kill nazis.”

 

What he really means is kill Germans. I wasn’t aware of that you know, that’s a British, supposedly a British brigade, a British army unit operating after the Second World War, going around and executing soldiers who had surrendered. There’s so many things like that about the Second World War that just fill you with revulsion and sickness of what your own government was up to!

 

Bill Atheling: It’s as if the dreadful Tarantino., …

 

Natty: Yes, exactly. In reverse!

 

Bill Atheling: Yeah, absolutely!

 

Natty: Yeah. There’s so many things like that.

 

I mean, this is going off on a tangent a little bit, but there’s a lot of instances in the media doing that kind of thing, switching up the sides. So Inglourious Basterds [2009] has this, you know, group of jews going around and killing people during the war. Well, it wasn’t, they weren’t taking prisoners in some partisan raid and carrying out daring things. They just got records and were going around extra judicially taking revenge on Germans.

 

And to get slightly off topic here, the same thing happened with, I’m going to forget the name of the film now, but it’s about a court case in which, oh it’s Our Time to Kill, it’s called. And it’s about a black father who kills two White kind of supremacists in the deep south after they rape his daughter. And the court case is all about the lawyer trying to get this black father off because you probably aren’t going to be judged too harshly for killing those two men.

 

But it turns out that the case was entirely reversed, and it was actually two black guys who had raped a young White girl. And that was the case that John Grisham had based the book off, which was the film was based off. That’s just an aside, but it just goes to show you the power of propaganda and what media can do.

 

[1:34:31]

 

 

Dave Gahary: Yeah. A pure jewish piece of propaganda! Screenplay by Akiva Goldsman, produced by Arnon Milchan.*

 

[* A Time to Kill is a 1996 American legal drama film based on John Grisham’s 1989 novel of the same name. Sandra Bullock, Samuel L. Jackson, Matthew McConaughey, and Kevin Spacey star with Donald and Kiefer Sutherland appearing in supporting roles and Octavia Spencer in her film debut. The film received mixed reviews but was a commercial success, making $152 million world-wide. Source: Wikipedia]

 

And of course, that’s that jewish Israeli spy who up until now has gotten off the hook with all the spying he did for Israel here in the United States.

 

Natty: Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you. Let’s do some of these Superchats. We will go through these and then we’ll give our final thoughts on the book. Open borders for Israel gave $5. Thank you so much, my friend. And thank you so much for your continued support. He says:

 

“Hey, Mark, would you consider doing a review of any Lothrop Stoddard’s books?”

 

I’m not sure what they are:

 

“I recommend The Rising Tide of Colour Against White World Supremacy*. It was written in the 1920s and predicted a massive number of non-Whites coming to the West.”

 

I haven’t actually heard of that, but thank you for the suggestion. I will look into it.

 

[* The Rising Tide of Color: The Threat Against White World-Supremacy (1920), by Lothrop Stoddard, is a book about racialism and geopolitics, which describes the collapse of White supremacy and colonialism because of the population growth among people of colour, rising nationalism in colonised nations, and industrialisation in China and Japan. To counter the perceived geopolitical threat, Stoddard advocated Nordicism, racial segregation, and general racism, restricting non-white immigration into white-majority countries, restricting immigration of non-members of the “Nordic race” to countries primarily containing members of the “Nordic race”; restricting Asian migration to Africa; and slowly giving independence to European colonies in Asia (including the Middle East). A noted eugenicist, Stoddard supported a separation of the “primary races” of the world and warned against miscegenation, the mixing of the races. Source: Wikipedia]

 

Natty: I had it. I had a quick look at that, Mark. And Wikipedia is probably not a good source, but it seems that Stoddard had some other ideas, like we talked about earlier, that went off the rails slightly, but it might be worth looking into.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, I’ll have a look into that. And thank you for the Superchat. D salon seven gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Here in America, German villainy did not exist before 1916.”

 

Now, this is a really good point. I don’t know if Dave wants to comment on this briefly. He says:

 

“We had German language schools, newspapers, social clubs, and strong ties to Germany all long gone now. A rich cultural legacy eradicated, leaving only faint traces behind. In any of the context, this would be called a mass atrocity.”

 

Would you like to comment on that, Dave?

 

The fact that America was once a lot of German representation and that was basically stamped out.

 

[1:36:28]

 

Dave Gahary: Yeah, a lot of this stuff, personally, I get angry about it. But yes, there was, there still is a huge German population here in America. And unfortunately, because of the propaganda and who spews it, yeah, the Germans were wholesale looked upon as the enemy. And the people who control the media have had it out for these poor folks for a long time. And they still do, obviously.

 

So that’s why it’s incumbent on us in our positions, in our individual and group positions, to make sure that we do whatever we can to get the proper information out to as many people as possible, not knowing who we’re going to impact, but knowing that we are, in fact, having a great impact, especially now.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much, Andy Great Story. Good to see you tonight, my friend. Again, $10. He said:

 

“The award section of Money Tree Publishing is fantastic! Exemplary awards!”

 

Well, thank you, my friend. And obviously, if you want this book, please do go to Money Tree Publishing. The link is in the description below. It takes you to where you can purchase this second edition of the book.

 

And I believe that’s exclusive to Money Tree Publishing. I couldn’t find it anywhere else.

 

Dave Gahary: Yeah, it is, Mark, I just want to say first two things. One is the awards section. I named it “Awards” because that was if you go to Money Tree publisher and you look on the menu, you’ll see it says Awards. And what that is that was the award I was given by the Anti-Defamation League. So thank you again, ADL and Jonathan Greenblatt!

 

Now in the United States, and yes, it is exclusive just to us, and we carry a lot of banned books and exclusive products. But the way that the US postal system works, the United States, Postal Service, is that currently the US government is subsidizing China.

 

And of course, this is at the expense of countries like the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, pretty much everywhere else.

 

So China is getting great rates because of, obviously, economics, and they’re making everybody else pay through the nose. So if somebody from the UK went to Money Tree Publishing and, let’s say, selected the colour version of the book, the cost of the colour version is $35. The cost of the black and white is 25. The shipping to the United Kingdom is $32.58.

 

So if you got the black and white version, the shipping would cost more than the actual book, which is really horrible, but we have no control over that.

 

But what I will say is that if anyone from the UK wants to get the book, just go to moneytreepublishing.com and click on the contact tab and send an email to me. I’ll get it. And just have the subject line Villainy or MGV, capital M, capital G, capital V for Myth German Villainy. And just let me know you’re from the UK and I can arrange it so the shipping cost will be reduced to maybe five or six pounds sterling versus almost US$33.

 

[1:40:32]

 

So I can do that because we can get this printed in the UK at a facility in the UK and shipped to the UK. So that would probably help out with anyone who doesn’t., … And I can’t blame you. I wouldn’t want to pay those prices. But these books are available only from Money Tree Publishing. And when we first started in January 2017 with one book, we have never raised our prices and we don’t plan on raising the prices because the goal is just to disseminate the information. This isn’t like a typical “for profit business”. It’s to get this information into as many hands as possible.

 

So we’re not focused on making money, we’re focused on educating with this material.

 

So please go to moneytreepublishing.com, click on the contact tab, fill out that information and let us know you’re from the UK, and we’ll save you close to probably $30.

 

Mark Collett: Superb. Thank you so much! It Was Made Up gave $5. Thanks so much:

 

“Just a small donation to keep the lights on. Thank you and farewell to Bill, and thank you for making me aware of Money Tree Publishing.”

 

Thank you so much! Robbie Herbert gave $5. Thanks so much. Said:

 

“My maternal grandmother went over the top. Sorry, maternal grandfather went over the top on the first day of the Somme in 1916 with nearly 800 men while serving in the 8th Battalion, King’s Own Yorkshire Light Infantry. He was wounded himself, but returned with less than 200 men on that fateful day. Something that he would never talk about.”

 

Thank you so much! And Robbie Herbert gave another $3.

 

Natty: Can I break in on that Superchat? Because, …

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, sure.

 

Natty: Someone mentioned this in the chat. There’s a brilliant YouTube channel [https://www.youtube.com/@ZoomerHistorian] at the moment called Zoomer Historian, or I think it’s Historian Zoomer. I’m not sure it’s even which way around, but he has just produced, I think it’s almost an hour long video saying:

 

“What would the war veterans think today? Would they have fought?”

 

It’s a really good channel and I don’t think it’s going to last long. So I’ll give it a plug here and if anyone wants to check it out, you can, because that Superchat, I think it was Rory Herbert, is very relevant to that topic, which is his latest video. So give Zoomer historian a chance if you’re on YouTube, guys.

 

[1:43:10]

 

Mark Collett: Thank you. Good plug there. And Rory Herbert gave another $3. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Just over a year ago, I was invited to a St. George’s Day dinner at my old regiment. One of the guest speakers was the Ukrainian ambassador. Needless to say I decided not to attend. But it just goes to show how the British army, the Ministry of Defence and our government are in cahoots with one another.”

 

Thank you so much! Zach gave an Aussie token, said:

 

“Mark, please review Joe Haldeman’s Forever War.* And did you ever hear from Jeremy from Kentucky, Patrick Satter is co-host about doing a show about PA on RBN?”

 

No, but it is something I would like to do, so if Jeremy’s listening, I would do that.

 

[* The Forever War, a 1974 novel by Joe Haldeman. The Forever War is a military science fiction novel by American author Joe Haldeman, telling the contemplative story about human soldiers fighting an interstellar war against an alien civilisation known as the Taurans. It won the Nebula Award in 1975 and the Hugo and Locus awards in 1976. Forever Free and Forever Peace are, respectively, direct and thematic sequel novels. Wikipedia]

 

Skip Meister, 68, gave $15. Thank you so much for the kind donation, and Space Can gave $5. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“What is a world of peace if it is made from the blood of innocents? Our ancestors demand an accounting for the World Wars inflicted upon us!”

 

I agree. That is a very, very good Superchat! And we have one more Superchat that was over on, … Let me just bring it up. Where’s the where’s the other tab? It was over on Rumble and it’s for $20 from Red Pill. Thank you so much!:

 

“Thank you, Mark, for all you do. I own this book. Will watch the replay. Wanted to throw you some funds, though. You’re a living legend!”

 

Well, thank you for so much, my friend. Thank you for the kind words.

 

So that is the Superchats wrapped up. We’ve got about ten minutes left, so let’s everyone give their summations of the book going around the group. Bill, Aunt Sally, Natty, then me, and then we’ll give Dave the last word. Starting with you, Bill. Go ahead, my friend.

 

Bill Atheling: Thank you, Mark.

 

And I must say that I’ve been very fortunate. Every book that I’ve been involved in reviewing on the book club has been really good, and this is no exception. My grandfather was a Dunkirk veteran. He was very badly wounded at Dunkirk and invalided out for the rest of the war. Very patriotic man. Believed he was doing the right thing. Lied about his age to join up. After the war. And what he saw, the way the country was going, he was incredibly disillusioned in it. And I think, just going back to what Natty was saying about with these ex-servicemen, he certainly would have had second thoughts if he had the chance again.

 

I think this is an excellent book! It challenges the orthodox historical interpretation of events throughout recent history. The last 150 years. It does so in a very concise, direct and convincing way, and in a way that is actually very accessible. It’s very well written. It’s written in a very clear style of prose. It’s well backed up, it’s well referenced and it’s well worth buying.

 

[1:46:14]

 

Aunt Sally: First of all, I want to apologise for the sound quality of me tonight. It will be fixed for the next one.

 

And also, I want to say thank you, Bill, for being part of the book club. It’s been great having you. This book, out of all the books we’ve done, I think this is the most important book! If I could only keep one, it would be this one, alongside Hellstorm. It’s not my favourite book, but it’s the most important. When I saw it was a book about politics, I don’t like reading about politics in particular, really bore me.

 

But it was just one of those I couldn’t put it down. In fact, when I did put it down, I was then thinking, it’s a fantastic book and I can’t recommend it highly enough. Thank you.

 

Mark Collett: Natty.

 

Natty: Yeah, fantastic! Highly recommended! And, like I said, there are many books that cover various aspects, but this book is a great overview.

 

So if you are looking as someone who isn’t well read on this subject, this would be a really good place to start, and then you could branch off and dive into other topics.

 

Just as a final note, there’s loads in this book we didn’t cover, and I’ve got quite a lot in my notes, but Dolo on Odysee says:

 

“Big A, (and he’s talking about Adolf Hitler) let the Dunkirk lads go.”

 

That’s correct. And there’s a there’s a section in this book that covers Dunkirk, what happened and how the Brits were amazed when they found out that Hitler essentially let the entire British force go. And didn’t wipe them out and didn’t take them captive, because he was hoping that, … He had a lot of admiration for the British and was hoping that they wouldn’t pester him anymore. Unfortunately, I didn’t pan out for him.

 

But there’s just so many nuggets of information like that in this book, and there’s a quotation by German admiral on that subject. So, like I said, there’s loads of stuff like this in this book.

 

So if you want to find out about this pivotal period in history, this book is a very good place to start.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, well, I’m going to give my thoughts on it. I obviously really enjoyed the book. I thought it was excellent, and it went well beyond the scope of what I was expecting it to go over. It’s much bigger, much more in depth.

 

And I think I went through a few of the chapter headings earlier, but here’s that again. The myth of Germany is an evil nation. The Bolshevik Revolution spreads throughout Europe, the nation of Israel, life in Germany under Hitler creating the case for war, Germany as the victim. There’s plenty in there, and it covers a real lengthy period of a tumultuous period of European history and puts it all into context.

 

So I really recommend it. But the thing I really like about this book is its very illustrative as well. I think these books can be very heavy, especially when they’re trying to explain things. But this book stops short. It doesn’t actually explain things. It shows you them with great pictures, illustrations. All these things are annotated, and it let’s, you know exactly the kind of propaganda that the people at the time were being fed.

 

[1:50:08]

 

And I think this book is so important at the moment because it let’s everybody know that this isn’t something new, that what we’re living through now is not unique. Our time is not something out of the ordinary. This sort of manure has been fed to our people for decades. For centuries, in fact, now. The weaponisation of propaganda to force people to go to war, to make people hate other people. This is an age old tactic. And the tactic hasn’t really changed or evolved. It’s still the same today as it was 100 years ago. Babies being beheaded, people dragging women off as they burn their homes down. And in today’s world, these things are being used every day to make British people want to go to war with Russia, to want to stand by and let Israel carpet bomb Palestinian civilians.

 

So I think this book is not only important from a historical perspective, but it helps people today place what we’re seeing within wider perspective.

 

So, yeah, a fantastic book! Dave, is there any last words you would like to say before we shut things down?

 

Dave Gahary: Yeah. Thank you, of course, for having me on and headlining the book, and great to take part in this discussion, and thank you all for your kind words about the book. Like I said, it shows me that I did my job, and I’m very appreciative of that. I want to just thank you, Mark and the panelists here and your organisation for everything you are doing, because we’re all noticing what’s happening, of course, over here on this side of the pond. And we’re very sad about the direction that things are going with the stifling of freedom of speech.

 

Of course, we have those protections enshrined here in our constitution, thanks to, as I mentioned, your ancestors. We have the Constitution. We have the so-called Bill of Rights with the speech protections and other protections.

 

And so we’re in a much different position, again, thanks to your country.

 

So we’re able to say the things that, sadly, you can’t. But we are very appreciative of what your organisation is doing, and we’re very saddened by some of the recent development with Sam and seeing the child born and him not being able to take part in that, it’s very disheartening the direction of things.

 

But again, I’ll say that for me, as long as I’m alive and breathing, I’m going to do whatever I can to make sure that we do have free speech.

 

And that’s really what keeps me going. It’s not that I have anything against a particular race or ethnic group. It’s that being an American and being raised with the protections that we were raised with, if you don’t use it, you’re going to lose it. And I don’t want anyone telling me what I can say, when I can say it.

 

And again, I can’t obviously equate this country with yours, but I can say that we’ll do whatever we can here on our side to help you guys out and make sure that you can get what we have. Thankfully, again, thanks to your great country.

 

[1:54:26]

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much! I think it’s been a great show tonight. I am extremely tired because I’ve been up since 03:00 am, traveling back from Finland. So I hope it’s still been a high energy show and that I’ve been coherent throughout. There’ll be more updates through the week, hopefully when pictures and speeches emerge from the event in Finland, which I hope you all enjoy.

 

Anyway, we’ll be back next month. I’ve got to just firm up who the, whether the author of the book that we’re having on next month, so I don’t want to announce it, is free on that particular Sunday. So going forward from there. I’ll be making an announcement very shortly on that, and if it is the book we think it’s going to be, there will also be a free PDF of that, which I’ll share with everyone so people can actually read the book before, for free. So that’ll be quite exciting.

 

Anyway, I just like to say a huge thank you to Dave for coming on tonight. Massive thanks to Aunt Sally and Natty, but a special thanks to Bill. It’s his last episode tonight.

 

I’d like to thank him for all his hard work with the book club over the years. It’s been really great hosting with him, and I look forward to seeing him at future events. And if he ever wants to come back for a one off, he is more than welcome.

 

So, would everyone like to say goodnight? And let’s give the last word tonight to Bill. So Sally, Natty, if you’d like to say goodnight, and then we’ll throw it over to Bill and close things down.

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, I just want to say good night Dave, and thank you very much for actually doing the book in the first place, because I think it’s a valuable resource for future generations.

 

And as Natty said, it’s a brief overview. It’s almost, I say, an idiot’s guide to what happened, but it’s an easy read guide to what happened.

 

So I just want to thank you, really, from the bottom of my heart, for bringing it all about. Thank you for being on the show as well. Thank you.

 

Dave Gahary: Thank you, Sally.

 

Natty: Yeah, good night, guys. Bill, you’re going to be missed! And to echo what a lot of people are saying in the chat, we miss Sam as well. And Dave, thank you for your kind words on that.

 

I mean, I didn’t have loads of interaction with Sam, but I miss him. You know, he was always present and I look forward to the day he’s back.

 

So thank you Chat, everyone who’s been interacting tonight, it’s been good and look forward to it next time.

 

[1:56:51]

 

Dave Gahary: Thanks, Natty.

 

Bill Atheling: Oh, thank you, everybody. And Mark, thank you so much! I totally enjoyed doing this. It’s just one of those things, circumstances beyond my control unfortunately, at the moment. It’s been a great privilege and a great pleasure to be here with this group of eloquent and interesting people. And thank you, Dave, for your book. It’s excellent!

 

As I said, it’s a high recommendation from me. And, yeah, Mark if things. Circumstances change, who knows? Maybe I’ll be allowed to come back on at some point in the future. But we’ll see what happens. But thank you, everyone. Keep supporting our guys. You know, I’m off to see Sam again next month. I write to him each week. You know, I write to Sam as well. Keep supporting them. You know, they, they’re doing well, but they need to hear from everyone and I’m sure many people are doing that anyway. Yeah. Thank you, everyone. And I shall bow out.

 

Dave Gahary: Thanks, Bill.

 

Mark Collett: Thank you so much to everyone.

 

I will be back in the week for Patriotic Weekly Review with Blair Cottrell.

 

I will also be gracing your screens when the footage from the Awakening Conference comes out. I did a speech all about Sam Melia and about the heroes of the future, so look forward to that.

 

I will also be back with Natty next weekend for the Nationalist A-Team. He will have all the maps installed or else he will face my wrath! And we will have a special guest for that stream as well, No Chance!

 

So we will be doing plenty through the week.

 

And if you haven’t checked it out, I’ve got a video out this week. It’s a bit of a light hearted one. I was in a bit of a rush this week, so I’ve got a light hearted video.

 

So if you’ve got ten minutes to kill and you want to laugh, that’s up as well. It’s about Lauren Southern. So I look forward to seeing you same time next month and hopefully before then.

 

And as I said, I’ll be back on Wednesday. Thank you to everyone. Thank you to Dave, thank you to Bill, thank you, Sally, thank you to Natty, and thank you to everyone who tuned in, everyone who donated so generously. Thank you so much! Have a great weekend, have a great evening. Good night, everyone. I’ll see you all again soon.

 

Dave Gahary: Thanks, Mark.

 

[1:59:08]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 4/29/2024 = 283)

Mark Collett
3 hours ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

0
1
MagicManintheSky
45 seconds ago
I have a copy of this absolutely brilliant book. It is easy to read and full of surprises to those who have been spoon-fed the Jewish propaganda narrative of WW2 all their lives.

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
Sign-up to the PA Newsletter (scroll down):
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/get_involved

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
Patriotic Alternative official links:
PATV:

Patriotic Alternative Video

Website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk
Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticAlternativeOfficial
Membership:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/join

@MilosM.
1 hour ago
oh great No Chance will be on the next gaming stream

0
1

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
Mark Collett video | Shut up Lauren, you Daft Bint!

@dsallen7
1 hour ago
14

All political expressiveness is flatulence; censor a fart and it will come back as thunder.
1 hour ago
thank you

@cheflad
1 hour ago
14 Deus Vult

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
Support Bill Atheling’s work (C.P. Webster):
► The Horror Beneath:
https://tinyurl.com/je8vsr44
► Albion: ARVA – VALA – DEVA:
https://tinyurl.com/4sw9er7d

@MilosM.
1 hour ago
14

0
1

@W_Poe_White
1 hour ago
14

@MilosM.
1 hour ago

@ReedJohnson
oh great.

@Aunt-Sally
1 hour ago
14

Nordic Warrior
1 hour ago
14

@CampsLindburgh
1 hour ago
14

@RoryHerbert
1 hour ago
14

DOLO
1 hour ago
14

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
14

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
14s for Bill

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
Thanks folks. Till next time.

)))Joker(((
1 hour ago
later o/

danzimmons
1 hour ago
thx

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago

@MilosM.
Mark’s speech on Awakening:

Awakening III 27.4.2024 https://t.co/EThZ8q7y84

— Monokulttuuri FM (@monokulttuuri) April 27, 2024

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
FREE Mark Collett eBook | The Fall of Western Man:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
Follow Mark Collett:
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/MarkCollett
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/c/MarkCollett
Telegram:
https://t.me/markacollett
BitChute:
https://tinyurl.com/ynec2sys
Gab:
https://gab.com/markcollett

DOLO
1 hour ago
Thank you gentlemen.

@MilosM.
1 hour ago
The Death of the West by Pat Buchanan idk if it is any good.

0
1
DOLO
1 hour ago

@Natty
np brother

@MilosM.
1 hour ago
oh, Mark was in Finland! Cannot wait to hear his impressions.

0
1
DOLO
1 hour ago
Very good all things considered, i would be miserable lol.

@cheflad
1 hour ago
14

@RoryHerbert
1 hour ago
14

danzimmons
1 hour ago
1⃣4⃣8⃣8⃣

Natty
1 hour ago

@DOLO
thanks Dolo, i havnt read that one

)))Joker(((
1 hour ago
14

@W_Poe_White
1 hour ago
Freedom of speech is a precious thing. It should have been part of European nations’ legal constitution. When bad actors are not allowed to monopolize the media, good actors have nothing to fear from allowing (((bad actors))) to spew their lies. You just answer them.

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
14

Nordic Warrior
1 hour ago
14

DOLO
1 hour ago
He personally had over 17 hand to hand fights lol

DOLO
1 hour ago

@Natty
by Leon Degrelle

@Zach
1 hour ago
even if Politicians don’t listen to Petitions to release political prisoners they are still helpful.

@W_Poe_White
1 hour ago
Jews don’t care about honor. They care about the collective power of the Jewish global nation-in-dispersion. The shame belongs to Churchill for allowing himself to be used against Britain, Germany and the entire White West.

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago

@Zach
That’s greatly appreciated. Thank you for doing so. No worries. We all do what we can, when we can.

DOLO
1 hour ago

@Natty
Campaign In Russia: The Waffen SS on the Eastern Front

@Zach
1 hour ago
but even if you can’t afford to donate theirs other ways to help I’ve also petitioned for Sam Melia and Sven longshanks immediate release.

Natty
1 hour ago

@DOLO
what is the book called? is it burning souls?

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago

@BillAtheling

danzimmons
1 hour ago
jews who compromised Churchill have zero honor.

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago

@Natty
Indeed. We all do.

@MilosM.
1 hour ago
14 for Sam.

Natty
1 hour ago
i miss sam

@cheflad
1 hour ago
Free Big Sam.

)))Joker(((
1 hour ago
Free Sam Melia

DOLO
1 hour ago
Great book sir, thank you.

@cheflad
1 hour ago
Deus Vult.

DOLO
1 hour ago
All his unit seems to do is go in hand to hand combat, it’s crazy.

@ArcadeOutpost
1 hour ago
14

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
The Myth of German Villainy | Benton Bradberry:

The Myth of German Villainy

► Money Tree Publishing:

Money Tree Publishing

Dave Gahary’s podcast with Dr David Duke:
https://speakfreeradio.com/category/podcasts/dave-and-duke-call-in-show/

@tuer
1 hour ago
interestingly many british vets became catholics

@Zach
1 hour ago

@ReedJohnson
I’m always boosting the stream whenever I can. I’d give money if I could but I don’t have a lot of money. if I had the money I’d be donating but I don’t though I do what I can to help. including boosting the stream and advertising on platforms for mark like YouTube.

@BillAtheling
1 hour ago

@ReedJohnson
cheers mate

DOLO
1 hour ago
Should read Degrelle’s campaign on the western front, it’s incredible.

@W_Poe_White
1 hour ago
Britain should have fought on the side of Germany against the USSR. If only alcoholic traitor Churchill had died of cirrhosis of the liver in the 1930s.

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago

@RoryHerbert
You’re welcome.

mb14
1 hour ago
My great grandfather was in Verdun on the right side. he got shot thru the arm.

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago

@BillAtheling
Thank you for all your contributions on Book Club. Always a pleasure. Best of luck.

DOLO
1 hour ago
Big A let the Dunkirk lads go.

@RoryHerbert
1 hour ago
Thanks for the above link

@ReedJohnson

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
Support Bill Atheling’s work (C.P. Webster):
► The Horror Beneath:
https://tinyurl.com/je8vsr44
► Albion: ARVA – VALA – DEVA:
https://tinyurl.com/4sw9er7d

jm
1 hour ago
Yes, Zoomer Historian is great !!!

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

All political expressiveness is flatulence; censor a fart and it will come back as thunder.
1 hour ago
zoomer historian looks fantastic

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
Zoomer Historian | Do British Veterans Regret Fighting World War 2?

DOLO
1 hour ago
I had a Great Grandad die at the somme as well.

Reginald Collett
1 hour ago

@mb14
6’1

@Zach
1 hour ago
moneys tight for everyone RN.

DOLO
1 hour ago
Bulk buy them mark

danzimmons
1 hour ago

danzimmons
1 hour ago
lol nice Dave

mb14
1 hour ago
1
How tall is mrs Mark?

DOLO
1 hour ago

@Patria
https://odysee.com/@DigitalAlexandria:5/Gilgamesh:9

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
The Myth of German Villainy | Benton Bradberry:

The Myth of German Villainy

► Money Tree Publishing:

Money Tree Publishing

@Zach
1 hour ago
1
mark please Review Joe Haldemans Forever war. and did you ever hear from Jeremy from Kentucky Patrick slattery Co Host about doing a show on PA or RBN.

Pro Patria: Patriot and Nationalist Channels
1 hour ago

@DOLO
Which audio of Gilgamesh?

mb14
1 hour ago
Hey Mark.

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

@tuer
1 hour ago
there was a hate crime in the mall of america, black man throwing a white baby three stories down, that was used race reversed in Wonder Woman 1984 – it’s just what a miss IDF does

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
A Time to Kill (1996 film):
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117913/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

DOLO
1 hour ago
Typical

@W_Poe_White
1 hour ago
No one hates more fervently and maniacally than Jewish supremacists.

DOLO
1 hour ago
Yeah

@UltimateTruth
1 hour ago
They love a false flag!

@RoryHerbert
1 hour ago

@Aunt-Sally
Just asking, I had a fox that broke into my chicken pen and killed all of them. My young children were upset for months.

)))Joker(((
1 hour ago
NKVD wore SS uniforms when doing the massacre

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
Hellstorm | PA Book Review:

@Aunt-Sally
1 hour ago
no Rory … I usually feed it

Long Knife
1 hour ago

@Natty
… I’m just want to examine the lampshade a little; that’s all … don’t tell me it mysteriously disappeared ?

@RoryHerbert
1 hour ago
Is the fox after your chickens, Aunt Sally?

DOLO
1 hour ago

@Natty
If you criticize the Shoes you hate the Jews!

Natty
1 hour ago

@LongKnife1934
a black and white photo of a pile of shoes isnt enough for you??? OY GEVALT

@RoryHerbert
1 hour ago
$3.00
Just over a year ago I was invited to a St. George’s Day dinner at my old regiment. One of the guest speakers was the Ukrainian Ambassador. Needless to say I didn’t attend but it just goes to show how the British Army, the Ministry of Defence and our government are in cahoots with one another.

Long Knife
1 hour ago
it’s ok to demand evidence

@ReedJohnson
1 hour ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@UltimateTruth
2 hours ago
The vanguard

Natty
2 hours ago

@SublimeBraid
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

SublimeBraid
2 hours ago
they’ve dug 666 rabbi holes around the one truth, Jewish Supremacy.

@UltimateTruth
2 hours ago

@DOLO
It saddens me that so many are taken in by him

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
The Myth of German Villainy | Benton Bradberry:

The Myth of German Villainy

► Money Tree Publishing:

Money Tree Publishing

DOLO
2 hours ago

@UltimateTruth
He was in London on St George day with Isreal flag lmao

)))Joker(((
2 hours ago

@DOLO
I liked how he praised the American Freedom Party, didn’t like what he just said about Patriot Front

@UltimateTruth
2 hours ago
If it wasn’t for the rigid & sophisticated censorship algorithms Jew elites have set on YouTube, millions more would be wake right now. Their shills & controlled opposition assets (Robinson, Murray, Hopkins, etc) don’t help matters

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
ancient Persia allowed Neahmiah to rebuild their temple. israel likes Idea of Persia. Its why you see the Paivlvo royal line consulted in the news. Today, the blood soaked temple sacrifice probably going thru.

DOLO
2 hours ago
Mark Dice was calling Patriot Front feds today, they are hopeless.

)))Joker(((
2 hours ago
well said

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
Follow Dr David Duke:
Website:

Home

Gab:
https://gab.com/realdavidduke
Telegram:
https://t.me/drdavidduke
RenseRadio:

Radio

SpeakFreeRadio:
http://tinyurl.com/mrxdkf26

DOLO
2 hours ago
lol

)))Joker(((
2 hours ago
(((Nosferatu)))

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
ancient Persia allowed Neahmia rebuild their temple be rebuilt. Today, the blood soaked temple sacrifice probably goung thru

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
you will all live to see concerning iran, it return to the name PERSIA. SEE trump cyrus coin. israel states they can wirk with Persia.

DOLO
2 hours ago
In the book the, monsters of babylon, he really tries to state how our ancestors have been made to look stupid, and that they were really just as smart as we are, but they just didn’t have access to the updated knowledge that we have in modern times, with modern science.

@UltimateTruth
2 hours ago
They are expert liars. They always invert the truth. Just look at how they’ve continually gas-lit & lied throughout the period of the Gaza genocide

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
jews and moslems. same thing

Natty
2 hours ago

@LongKnife1934
yeah just like in kuwait, testified to in front of congress……and was exposed as complete horse shit

)))Joker(((
2 hours ago
… human nature hasn’t change

)))Joker(((
2 hours ago
so real

DOLO
2 hours ago
I actually listened to Gilgamesh the other day, fantastic story.

@tuer
2 hours ago
some people seem to enjoy to hate on germans, ever watched sargoy of akkads video on the Suebi?

Long Knife
2 hours ago

@WhiteLightKnight
… did they take the babies out of incubators before throwing them ? :hyper_troll:

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
Purchase Grandma Towler’s tea, coffee, and honey:
https://www.grandmatowlers.co.uk/shop/

DOLO
2 hours ago
The book was excellent in my opinion, highly recommended.

@WhiteLightKnight
2 hours ago
The level of brainwashing is astonishing

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
When this book is REQUIRED READING in high schools, youll know America is healed.

@WhiteLightKnight
2 hours ago
A junior colleague told me of a hospital in Poland he visited. There was a plaque telling of how German soldiers threw babies off the roof. I told him to wake up and think about the German people of today. They are no different and Germans in 1940s were human and would not throw babies off roofs.

@Zach
2 hours ago

@karuppusuriyan
they were Jewish Bolsheviks the ones on top at least.

@UltimateTruth
2 hours ago
Jewish control of western mass media has been their greatest weapon in terms of conditioning the masses

)))Joker(((
2 hours ago
uh, source

)))Joker(((
2 hours ago
or stormtroopers from star wars

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
For sure! Tikkun olam. looks great. whoever thought putting talmudic mandates in charge of fixing the world, was a good idea.

@CampsLindburgh
2 hours ago
ordered. look forward to reading

DOLO
2 hours ago

@Darth_Joker
\o

@Zach
2 hours ago
it’s so Ridiculous it should be easy to perceive as blatant propaganda. but many of the Teachers who taught it in school believed it was actually true. my area has a lot of Christian Zionists so I think they were just regurgitating propaganda that they were fed.

)))Joker(((
2 hours ago
o/ guys

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
Please consider a small donation of $3, $5, or $10. When everyone donates $3, $5, or $10 it adds up!
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@tuer
2 hours ago
had I to describe the English in one German word it would be “vermessen”

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

@Zach
2 hours ago
being a Former liberal I used to think similar to Aunt Sally obviously not her real name. but similar propaganda here in America the German’s and Japanese Roasting Jewish babies on Bayonet’s. similar to the 40 beheaded babies the same people are claiming what a Cohencidence.

danzimmons
2 hours ago
the intelligence agencies have given billions to the true traitorous scum the reporter’s ie activists sellout pukes

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
Support Bill Atheling’s work (C.P. Webster):
► The Horror Beneath:
https://tinyurl.com/je8vsr44
► Albion: ARVA – VALA – DEVA:
https://tinyurl.com/4sw9er7d

@tuer
2 hours ago
just think about how much more dehumanizing it is to call others cattle/goy by default and compare that to barbarian, infidel or even a rat (which is at least free)

danzimmons
2 hours ago
so clear to even the most gullible fecking normie, or should be

@SkipMeister
2 hours ago
Truth is, this Ukraine war started in similar fashion to German/Poland.

SURIYAN
2 hours ago

@Zach
id rather call them soviets rather than russians

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
moslems and jews. same thing.

@Zach
2 hours ago
oh there was plenty of pillaging and merrymaking of women to put it in a PG way. but it wasn’t the German’s dragging women and underage girls to the barns. it was the so called heroes the Russians and to some degree the Americans.

@tuer
2 hours ago
with the printing press, fertilizers and that car thingie that we shared with the world, it’s kinda stunning what propaganda can achieve

)))Joker(((
2 hours ago
…lol

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
it answered all my questions for sure. Diane King and Rizolis recomends if the book sold me

@Elledee77
2 hours ago

@RoryHerbert

The Awakened Saxon
2 hours ago
‘Find a reason to go to war with Germany.’ Letter from King George V to Sir Edward Grey, Foreign Secretary. However when the Foreign Secretary Sir Edward said that the cabinet hadn’t found a justifiable reason to enter the conflict, the King replied: ‘You have got to find a reason, Grey.’

@RoryHerbert
2 hours ago
The bombing of Dresden was clearly a war crime.

DOLO
2 hours ago

@Zach
My mistake. You could always pull a Bowden and whip out the magnifying glass lol

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago

@SerenaJB
You’re welcome

@SerenaJB
2 hours ago

@ReedJohnson
Thanks Reed!

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
Follow SerenaJB:
X:
Tweets by SerenaJB3
Gab:
https://gab.com/SerenaJB

@Zach
2 hours ago

@DOLO
I’m aware this is available on Audio but apparently the fall of Western man isn’t.

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
Mark’s speech on Awakening:

Awakening III 27.4.2024 https://t.co/EThZ8q7y84

— Monokulttuuri FM (@monokulttuuri) April 27, 2024

@SerenaJB
2 hours ago
Good evening.

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago

@Zach
Indeed. That would be a good idea.

Natty
2 hours ago

@WhiteLightKnight
i cant see it lasting long

@WhiteLightKnight
2 hours ago

@Natty
Nice one. I am hooked to his stuff.

DOLO
2 hours ago

@Zach
https://odysee.com/@DigitalAlexandria:5/MythOfGermanVillany:8

@Zach
2 hours ago

@ReedJohnson
I’m sure it’s a good read but unfortunately because of my eyesight I won’t be able to enjoy it. hopefully someone can make it available in a Audio Format for people with Vision problems.

Natty
2 hours ago

@WhiteLightKnight
was going to plug him at the end of the stream

@tuer
2 hours ago
ZH’s video on british vets is dope

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
The Myth of German Villainy | Benton Bradberry:

The Myth of German Villainy

Money Tree Publishing:

Money Tree Publishing

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
heres the cazm of America and Europe ww 2. When my Dad met my mother here in America, 50s, he told her he was a nazi. her ww2 info from America, caused that news to scare her.

@WhiteLightKnight
2 hours ago
On youtube there is a mind-blowing content creator callled Zoomer Historian. His playlist of AH is absolutely incredible.

@Zach
2 hours ago
what I find aggravating is how the Jewish plot to kill millions of German’s by Jews. by poisoning the water is covered up by the media and on the rare occasions it’s talked about the Jews are portrayed as the Victims acting in self defense. a blatant lie but stupid people believe it.

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
Please consider a small donation of $3, $5, or $10. When everyone donates $3, $5, or $10 it adds up!
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

@WhiteLightKnight
2 hours ago
This book is fantastic. It’s such a great gateway to give to the Vagues.

@RoryHerbert
2 hours ago
$5.00
My maternal grandfather went ‘over the top’ on the First day of the Somme in 1916 with nearly 800 men whilst serving in the 8th Battalion, King’s Own Yorkshire Light Infantry. He was wounded himself but returned with less than 200 men on that fateful day. Something that he would never talk about.

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago

@Zach
I’m sorry. No, unfortunately.

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
im German Hungarian. my dad was a child in ww 2

@Zach
2 hours ago
I enjoy reading but it’s very hard on my eyes so I’m forced to use audio formats.

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
YES!!!

@Zach
2 hours ago

@ReedJohnson
is marks book available on Audio due to my bad eyesight it’s how I learn from books.

@Elledee77
2 hours ago

@Zach
2 hours ago
the forever wars is available on Audio it’s not an expensive book either although I prefer Audiobooks over reading due to my bad eyesight.

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
FREE Mark Collett eBook | The Fall of Western Man:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
and things my dad said. he was a child in Europe during ww 2

Avid Fan
2 hours ago
Sort your mic out Bill, ffs.

danzimmons
2 hours ago
“concentrate” jews

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
let me say, Diane made reference to a vid for zio deprograming. THAT IS A FACT. Deprogramming from what has been puked into the mind if the west makes PERFECT SENSE TO ME. ive dealt with these. My self also. thanks to the Rizoli infos, i made it out.

@BillAtheling
2 hours ago
it’s because I talk like an Italian, even on my own, waving my arms about

@Zach
2 hours ago
but I think Haldeman had unintentionally stumbled onto their plans for the military in the Future and it spooked them to some degree. but then again I can’t see the Future just making an educated guess.

@Zach
2 hours ago
Joe Haldeman that was his name I’ve only read the first book of the series. but I consider the gay parts to be a Warning of the Future of America rather than LGBT Propaganda. especially considering how his book was attacked by the media not to the extent of a WN book would be.

Bianca Fights The Zombies
2 hours ago
“big tiddy goth girls needed, stat”

danzimmons
2 hours ago
steady your mic cord Bill

@tuer
2 hours ago
so basically our hope should rest on the chinese avenging the opium shame

@EndJewishPrivilege
2 hours ago
I can hear what sounds like a stapler

danzimmons
2 hours ago
lol

Bianca Fights The Zombies
2 hours ago
the code is “send more beer”

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
Sign-up to the PA Newsletter (scroll down):
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/get_involved

@WingITprod
2 hours ago
Morse code

Long Knife
2 hours ago
Finally, England, through the Balfour Declaration, took over the safeguarding of Jewish interests in all states. The Frankfurter Zeitung knew exactly at the time what it was saying when it declared that the Balfour Declaration had been the yeast of English victory.” ~ Alfred Rosenberg

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
yep! their walk and talks are awesome.

Bianca Fights The Zombies
2 hours ago
microphone is clicking

Long Knife
2 hours ago
It had allowed the opium trade to fall increasingly into Jewish hands. The Jew Lord Reading, whose real name was Isaacs, took care of important loan negotiations with the United States of America.

Long Knife
2 hours ago
It had handed over control of all financial transactions to Jewish bankers such as Rothschild, Montague, Cassell, Lazards, and the rest.

Long Knife
2 hours ago
“Before and during the World War, Jewish high finance had declared that its policy coincided with the policy of Great Britain. England had conquered South Africa for the Jewish diamond dealers such as Lewis, Beith, Lewisohn, and the rest.

@Zach
2 hours ago

@Natty
he was attacked by the Media back in the day as being anti gay. I’m familiar with the Future soldiers being gay and Lesbian but back in the 70s when he wrote the book. his critics said that will never happen mate now look at the state of the military.

Bianca Fights The Zombies
2 hours ago
Rizoli walk and talk are great

danzimmons
2 hours ago
Bill hold your mic cord please

@Thor’sHammer
2 hours ago
It was not for nothing that the German Emperor was known as the Emperor of Peace in World War 1

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
ive followed the Rizolis since 2014-2015. It was amazing to see Diane King and Rizolis contributions in credits! too.

danzimmons
2 hours ago
ThX for everything you do for our people Dave

@BillAtheling
2 hours ago

@RoryHerbert
hello Rory!

@tuer
2 hours ago
makes post ww2 british ‘comedy’ even more disturbing and disgusting

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
what i loved mean

@tuer
2 hours ago
always been the bad guys …

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago

@Clasha
Hello and welcome.

@Elledee77
2 hours ago
YES!! THATS what i lived about it. it goes back to Germany becoming a nation, ww 1. And it provided photo DOCUMENTS

@Clasha
2 hours ago
Good afternoon

NOMATAWOT
2 hours ago

@BIANCA
Sir

Bianca Fights The Zombies
2 hours ago
sup bros

@PaganBear
2 hours ago
I wish there was a way to get it in Canada without the crazy shipping. It will cost over 65 USD dollars in Canada, I really want it though

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago

@ItWasMadeUp
Thanks for your support.

danzimmons
2 hours ago
good point Aunt Sally

@AndyGreatstory
2 hours ago
:first_quarter_moon_face:

@ItWasMadeUp
2 hours ago
$5.00
Just a small donation to help keep the lights on. Thank you & farewell to Bill, and thanks for making me aware of Moneytree Publishing.

@ReedJohnson
2 hours ago
The Myth of German Villainy | Ben Bradberry:

The Myth of German Villainy

@RoryHerbert
3 hours ago
Good evening ‘Bill the Academic’ ! :laughing:

meaty
3 hours ago
Brilliant book a must read for all.

@ReedJohnson
3 hours ago

@RoryHerbert
Good evening.

@RoryHerbert
3 hours ago
Good evening folks.

@ReedJohnson
3 hours ago
Support Bill Atheling’s work (C.P. Webster):
► The Horror Beneath:
https://tinyurl.com/je8vsr44
► Albion: ARVA – VALA – DEVA:
https://tinyurl.com/4sw9er7d

Rebellious Goy
3 hours ago
Early 20th century, Germans were the USA’s largest ethnic group

@ReedJohnson
3 hours ago
Please consider a small donation of $3, $5, or $10. When everyone donates $3, $5, or $10 it adds up!
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 hours ago

@MarkCollett
Donation on Rumble:
R3dPill3d
$20
Thank you Mark for all you do. I own this book. Will watch the replay. Wanted to throw you some funds though. You are a living legend.

@ReedJohnson
3 hours ago

@MilosM.
Evening mate. Unfortunately, couldn’t make it.

Natty
3 hours ago
howdy milo

@MilosM.
3 hours ago

@Natty
hey Natty

Natty
3 hours ago
i read it before i was redpilled

@Zach
, i thought it was just a boring version of starship troopers but its been a long time so i might re-visit it, dont they end up in a future where everyone is gay and brown??

@MilosM.
3 hours ago

@ReedJohnson
hello Reed. I asked where you been last sunday.

@ReedJohnson
3 hours ago

@AndyGreatstory
Thanks for your contribution.

@AndyGreatstory
3 hours ago
$10.00
The awards section of Money Tree Publishing is fantastic! Exemplary awards!

Awards

@ReedJohnson
3 hours ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

@MilosM.
3 hours ago
evening everyone.

@Zach
3 hours ago
the Forever wars is a good read it’s a 3 part series I believe. even though it’s Fiction the writer was a Veteran of the Vietnam War. and is a great anti war book discussing how wars only benefit the Rich. of course he doesn’t talk about who the Rich benefiting from wars are but it’s a good read.

@ReedJohnson
3 hours ago

@dsallen7
Thanks for your dedicated support.

@dsallen7
3 hours ago
$5.00
Here in America, German “villainy” did not exist before 1916. We had German language schools, newspapers, social clubs, and strong ties to Germany, all long gone now. A rich cultural legacy eradicated, leaving only faint traces behind. In any other context this would be called a mass atrocity.

@ReedJohnson
3 hours ago
Hellstorm | PA Book Review:

@Amalek61
3 hours ago
Great topic. More should be known about what really happened

@UltimateTruth
3 hours ago
Tremendous book!

@ReedJohnson
3 hours ago
The Hoaxbusters podcast on Speak Free Radio:
https://speakfreeradio.com/category/podcasts/hoaxbusters/

Natty
3 hours ago
hello

@EnglishRose

@EnglishRose
3 hours ago
Hello

@ReedJohnson
3 hours ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 hours ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

@ReedJohnson
3 hours ago
The Myth of German Villainy | Ben Bradberry:

The Myth of German Villainy

@ReedJohnson
3 hours ago
Follow Mark Collett:
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/MarkCollett
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/c/MarkCollett
Telegram:
https://t.me/markacollett
BitChute:
https://tinyurl.com/ynec2sys
Gab:
https://gab.com/markcollett

All political expressiveness is flatulence; censor a fart and it will come back as thunder.
3 hours ago
cheers

@ReedJohnson
3 hours ago
This stream is also available on DLive:
https://dlive.tv/MarkCollett

@aeonsof
3 hours ago
there is an audio version on Bitchute and here it is:

@ItWasMadeUp
3 hours ago
Nice, thank you.

All political expressiveness is flatulence; censor a fart and it will come back as thunder.
3 hours ago
I think its on archive.org

@ItWasMadeUp
3 hours ago
This sounds like a book I would be interested in, looking forward to the stream!

All political expressiveness is flatulence; censor a fart and it will come back as thunder.
3 hours ago
evening chaps

Pro Patria: Patriot and Nationalist Channels
3 hours ago
Dave Gahary:

Money Tree Publishing

Natty
3 hours ago

@SomeRandomBloke
stoddard looks interesting

@ReedJohnson
4 hours ago

@SomeRandomBloke
Thanks for your ongoing support.

@ReedJohnson
4 hours ago
Please consider a small donation of $3, $5, or $10. When everyone donates $3, $5, or $10 it adds up!
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
4 hours ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

@ReedJohnson
4 hours ago
Patriotic Alternative official links:
PATV:

Patriotic Alternative Video

Website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk
Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticAlternativeOfficial
Membership:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/join

@random
5 hours ago
the racist German stereotype its created by Jews from the propaganda machine Hollywood

Open Borders for Israel
7 hours ago
$5.00
hey Mark, would you consider doing a review of any of lorthrop stoddard’s books? i recommend the rising tide of colour against white world supremacy… it was written in the 1920s and predicted the massive number of non whites coming to the West

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Part 01 — Cover text; About the Author; Preface; Chapter 1: The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation

Part 02 — Chapter 2: Aftermath of the War in Germany

Part 03 — Chapter 3: The Jewish Factor in the War

Part 04 — Chapter 4: The Russian Revolution of 1917

Part 05 — Chapter 5: The Red Terror

Part 06 — Chapter 6: The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads Throughout Europe

Part 07 — Chapter 7: The Nation of Israel

Part 08 — Chapter 8: Jews in Weimar Germany

Part 09 — Chapter 9: Hitler and National Socialists Rise to Power

 

 

Part 10 — Chapter 10: National Socialism vs Communism

Part 11 — Chapter 11: Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany

Part 12 — Chapter 12: The Nazis and the Zionists Actually Work Together for Jewish Emigration out of Germany

Part 13 — Chapter 13: Life in Germany Under Hitler

Part 14 — Chapter 14 & 15: Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory; The 1936 Olympics

Part 15 — Chapter 16: “Anschluss” The Unification of Austria and Germany

Part 16 – Chapter 17: Germany Annexes the Sudetenland

Part 17 – Chapter 18: War with Poland

Part 18 – Chapter 19: The Phony War

 

 

Part 19 – Chapter 20: Germany invades France – The Phony War Ends

Part 20 – Chapter 21: The Allied Goal? Destruction of Germany!

Part 21 – Chapter 22: Germany as Victim

Part 22 (last) – Chapter 23: Winners and Losers

 

 

 

See also:

 

The Myth of German Villainy: Author Ben Bradberry Interview — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

 

 

 

The World’s First Anti-Holocaust Convention — Instauration Dec, 1979

An Open Letter to New Jersey’s Governor

Historians or Hoaxers?

House of Orwell

Misha: Surviving with Wolves or …

Bradley Smith’s Smith Report # 1

The Liberation of the Camps: Facts vs. Lies

The Plum Cake

 

 

 

Auschwitz: Myths and Facts

Powers and Principalities XI – Ewen Cameron, MK-Ultra, Holocaust Revisionism — TRANSCRIPT

Tales of the Holohoax – A Historian’s Assessment – Part 1

The Holocaust Lie — Made in America

Probing the Holocaust: The Horror Explained — TRANSCRIPT

Jim Rizoli Interviews Prof Robert Faurisson, Oct 2015 — TRANSCRIPT

Holocaust Eyewitnesses: Is the Testimony Reliable?

Alain Soral – My Homage to Robert Faurisson, Oct 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Inside Auschwitz – You’ve never seen THIS before! — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

Amazion Bans 100s of Holocaust Revisionist Books!

AUSCHWITZ – A Personal Account by Thies Christophersen

Jim Rizoli Interviews Bradley Smith — TRANSCRIPT

London Forum – Alfred Schaefer – Psychological Warfare – TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report Interviews Eric Hunt — TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice Radio – Germar Rudolf – Persecution of Revisionists & Demographic Disaster – Part 1— TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice Radio: Nicholas Kollerstrom — TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice TV – Ingrid Carlqvist – Scandal in Sweden When Ingrid Questions the Unquestionable — TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report with Carolyn Yeager on Johnson vs Anglin debate — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

 

 

911 – The Jews Had Me Fooled: A Jewish Engineered Pearl Harbor

Organized jewry Did 9/11

Organized jewry Did 9/11 — The 16th Anniversary, 2017

Know More News — Christopher Bollyn, The Man Who Solved 9/11 — TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report with Christopher Bollyn – Sep 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Guns and Butter interviews Christopher Bollyn — The War on Terror – Dec 18, 2019 — Transcript

AE911Truth – Exposing Those Who Covered up the Crime of the Century – May 28, 2023 – Transcript

 

============================================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 17,596

• Total words in post = 22,755
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

 

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3: Wed, May 1, 2024 — Published post. Transcript now complete. Added links to serialised book (first edition) posts here.

Version 2: Tue, Apr 30, 2024 — Published post. 95/119 mins of transcript complete.

Version 1: Mon, Apr 29, 2024 — Published post. 33/119 mins of transcript complete. Includes Odysee comments (283).

Mark Collett: Hello everybody. And welcome to tonight’s stream. And, of course, it is the final Sunday of the month. So it is Book Club. And tonight we are reviewing Hammer of the Patriot, which is published by Claymore Books.

 

Now, we are live tonight on Odysee, which is our preferred platform. It allows you to stream, upload videos, take donations. It allows you to trade crypto. It allows you to support your favourite content creators. It’s basically like YouTube without the censorship. So please support us there.

 

We’re also live on Dlive and we are live on Radio Albion.com which is the home of Sven Longshanks who is a wonderful nationalist and works tirelessly for this cause. It’s a place where numerous different streams, numerous different radio shows, are all collected. So basically if you go there you will find a wealth of nationalist material that you can sink your teeth into.

 

Now tonight’s stream lasts about two hours. We review the book. And then we take questions and answers from the audience. So if you would like to contribute to this stream, or if you’d like to contribute to my work you can contribute via going to Entropy. The Entropy link will be spammed in the chat throughout the night Entropy allows you to ask questions. If you ask a question which is unpaid we’ll answer them at the end. But if you ask a paid question, or send a donation, which is called a Superchat, we will read any question, or comment that is attached to a donation.

 

Odysee, as I said, earlier, is a wonderful platform there is a support button on our Odysee. If you hover over that and click support, you can send a donation. And all of those donations again if they have a question, or comment attached we read them out live on stream.

 

Now if you don’t like donating that way. And you want to be more anonymous, you can donate via crypto. All my crypto links are in the description beneath this video whether you’re watching it on Odysee, or on BitChute for the replay.

 

Secondly, if you want to find those crypto links. You can find them on my Telegram and GAB. Now obviously crypto is like magic beans! And at the moment the beans are worthless. But, one day they might turn into a big beanstalk which may, or may not have an ogre living at the top of it. But if you want me to look after your magic beans, I am happy to do so. So you can send crypto.

 

Finally, if you want to get in touch with me, or send bank transfer. Or if you want to give feedback on this stream, or any other thing, you can write to me at mark@thefallofwesterman.com. And I nearly always reply unless you send me a circular. So don’t subscribe me to your newsletter if I haven’t asked to be subscribed. Because that will be deleted. But if it’s a genuine message, a cry for help, or a question, or some feedback, I will always reply. So you can write to me there.

 

Now I’m really looking forward to this particular Book Club. And the reason being is this book has been published by Claymore Books. And tonight we’ve got Kenny Smith with us.

 

I’m going to start by introducing him. Because Claymore Books is a nationalist book publisher based here in the United Kingdom. They’re going to be publishing a number of other books that relate to ideology and the struggle here in the UK. So this is really important. Because again, it’s another nationalist business. It’s another business that you can help build, it’s another business that is providing a service to nationalists. But in this case it’s not something you’d maybe use in your everyday life. It’s actually a nationalist service for nationalists, by nationalists. So very, very important.

 

And it is important that if you’re buying these books you buy them from a nationalist source. Obviously if the only place you can get them is Amazon, or Lulu, fair enough. But if you can buy them directly from the publisher that’s a lot better for publishers.

 

So Kenny, obviously we know you from your work with PA, and from your lifetime involvement in the nationalist cause, you’re now running Claymore Books. Would you like to tell us a little bit about Claymore Books and introduce yourself.

 

 

Kenny Smith: Hi Mark. Thank you very much. Yeah, I have been wondering to myself recently if I’m absolutely barking mad, because I have a day job, I’ve got a post in PA that takes up a lot of time I’ve also got a family. And I struggle to fit all these things in, quite often. But I decided to start a business as well! [chuckling] So yeah, I’m not quite sure it was the wisest move in the world. But it is something I’ve wanted the movement to have for a very long time.

 

You and I were involved in the BNP when it was at its height. It was massive! And a lot of money came through the movement, and it fell apart! And there’s nothing left to show. Not a printer. Not a business. Nothing!

 

And what we’re doing in PA is very, very different. We’re encouraging the nationalist movement to act like a proper community. To build businesses. To work with each other and support each other.

 

And for me one of the biggest aspects of that is education. I think we failed previously when we were part of the BNP. In that we got lots of people involved, to get involved with the politics. But we didn’t get the families involved like you did a normal community. And we didn’t educate them to stay in the struggle.

 

So I have been working with quite a lot of people behind the scenes. And we’ve got a fabulous team at Claymore. And we decided just to go for it! And start getting back into print books that are hard to get. As you’re aware, Amazon, and Lulu, and places like that, have shut down access to nationalist publishers.

 

So we just did, you know, really what Laura did with Grandma Towler’s. And decided:

 

“We’ll just do it ourselves!”

 

And so far it’s working well. I am seem to be pushed for time a lot. But we’ve got a fabulous team. Some folk in England, some folk in Wales, and a couple of guys in Scotland. And we’re all doing it for the good of the moment. And I’m really excited that you guys have chosen to review our first book tonight.

 

 

[5:02]

 

Mark Collett: Well it’s a real pleasure having you here Kenny. And, as I said, it’s always even better when we are pushing something that is a product, as I said, by nationalists for nationalists! It’s a business that primarily is geared to our needs, run by our people, for our people. So absolute pleasure to have you here tonight.

 

Now let’s go around the group. Obviously it has been the weekend. Different people would have been doing different things. And we’re going to start with Laura, because she is next to Kenny on the screen. Laura. How are you doing? Have you had a good weekend? And did you enjoy the book? And what was your first impression of it.

 

Laura Towler: Hi everyone. Yes I had a good weekend. Thank you and I did enjoy the book I actually bought this when it went live, when Claymore books went live and this book was out to support Kenny and his publishing company.

 

And I sped through! It’s quite a short book. It’s, how many pages? Let me see. 150 pages. So you can read it really fast. But it’s one of those that you just pick up when you want a response to something. So this book for anyone who’s not read it, it teaches you how to argue from a nationalist perspective.

 

But, rather than filling your head with a load of statistics, and a load of sort of like logical rebuttals, it teaches you how to use force. And it’s more of a battle for dominance, rather than a battle for facts. Obviously [chuckling] we have facts on our side as well.

 

But so, for example, do you remember when Tommy Robinson went on TV with Piers Morgan. And Piers Morgan were calling him all these names. And Tommy Robinson were like:

 

“Oh no! I’m not! No, I’m not! No I’m not!”

 

And he was defending himself. The audience are watching that and thinking to themselves:

 

“Well, Piers is in power there.”

 

So what this book does is it teaches you to be in power and put the other person on the back foot. So it doesn’t have things like:

 

“Well, actually that’s wrong. Because these are the correct statistics.”

 

They’re not the kind of arguments it has. It has stuff where you put your opponent in their place, and mock them, and humiliate them. And you can actually be quite brutal with them, as well. And it’s like a battle for dominance and power. And the idea is that if somebody’s watching, they’ll see you as a winner and want to side with you.

 

So it’s a really good book. You can just pick it up and, if you need an answer to a certain question there are some in there. And I like a lot of them there are some of them that I wouldn’t use. I think I’d say something else. But I do think there is something for everyone in there.

 

The only criticism I will have. And it’s not actually a criticism, it’s just by chance. But it is from an American perspective. So some of the responses they don’t really count for us. So, for example, when someone says:

 

“Oh! You invaded someone else’s land.”

 

And there were immigrants, or there weren’t natives there already. Obviously as an American you’d have a different response to a British person. So that’s the only criticism that have really, but 90 and 95 percent of the answers in there are relevant. So yeah, it’s really good. And I’ll pass back to you Mark.

 

Mark Collett: Well, our next guest on the panel tonight is the lovely Aunt Sally. But wait a second! Aunt Sally used to be the Queen of technical issues. But she now has a world-class, professional microphone and headset set up. So I’m hoping tonight we’re going to have the first night of absolutely perfect audio from Aunt Sally!

 

And take it away Aunt Sally! Did you enjoy the book? Did you have a good weekend. And what are your initial impressions?

 

[10:00]

 

Aunt Sally: Oh hello everybody. I did have a good weekend. Yes, it’s weird now I’ve got this microphone. I hope the sound’s coming through really well.

 

Laura Towler: It’s really good. It’s really clear.

 

Aunt Sally: Good. It’s like I still want to lean all over it like I used to before with the computer, when I was using the mic on the computer. I used to lean on it. And it was terrible. But yeah. Thank you for this Mark. I’ve forgotten the other question. Did I enjoy the book? Yeah, I really did, I really did. I’m too old, I’m not into debating. But there’s some really good sound bites in there for when you do come up against somebody. Like, I’ve had family members argue with me, and this has really good sound bites. So yeah, I really enjoyed it. Thank you.

 

Mark Collett: Okay. Absolutely wonderful audio there! As clear as a black bird song. And finally last, but certainly not least, is Natty. Did you have a good weekend my friend? What have you been up to? Did you enjoy the book? And what were your initial impressions?

 

Natty: Hi guys. Yes, I’ve had a fantastic weekend. Been at a rowing competition in Plymouth on Saturday, followed by, …

 

Mark Collett: Did you win?

 

Natty: Oh, sorry. What was that Mark?

 

Mark Collett: Did you win?

 

Natty: We didn’t, no. We got knocked out in the semi-finals unfortunately.

 

Mark Collett: Oh! Gutted mate! Gutted! I wouldn’t have put my money on you, anyway mate! I wouldn’t put my money on you anyway!

 

Natty: Well [chuckling] I wasn’t rowing, I was coxing. So that’s probably why we didn’t win. If I’d been in the boat, you know, big arms, big shoulders, we would have won.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah mate, you are impressively built. So why were you just hiding in there giving orders like, …

 

Natty: Unfortunately the way the crews had to be stacked. It was a mixed championship. So it was girls and boys in the boat, and we didn’t have any more experienced coxes. So I had to take the reins, unfortunately, but still, it was good fun. It was good fun. And it was a good weekend.

 

And I went to a festival last night. A local festival down here in Cornwall called Tunes in the Dunes, which was good fun. I didn’t drink too much. Had a good night, and gave some friends a lift home, so very, very, very non-degenerate weekend, thankfully.

 

As for the book, this is fantastic! We’ve covered a lot of books on the Book Review. And most of them have approached things from our perspective in different ways. I remember The Transgender Industrial Complex. I’m sure you can all remember that book. That was a slog to get through, although it was packed with information and various parts of the puzzle.

 

I’m looking up at my shelf now. We have Edward Dutton’s, Making Sense of Race. These are really educational books. So really help put things into place in your mind Hammer of the Patriot is almost like being back in secondary school. It’s like a textbook.

 

And for anyone who’s ever gonna run into debates, or it even thinks about getting into debates with lefties, or the kind of disingenuous people you find on the internet, even in the media, or politicians.

 

Just as an aside, some of the responses that Mark, yourself, and Laura, have put together. And some of the regional guys have done, to media attacks on PA, have included responses such as leave absolutely no room, no equivocating, they’re not rolling over like Laura said, Tommy Robinson style. And saying:

 

“No! No! We’re not racist! No! No! We’re not this! Stop! Stop!”

 

You know, full-on dominate, dominate the response! Leave no room for them to kind of pick things out and make you look weak. And this book is brilliant at giving you the tools in your mind to do that. So I can’t recommend it enough!

 

And if I’d had this book before I’d started making groipe calls, I’m sure they would have been at least some order of magnitude more effective, and more engaging to listen to. So unfortunately this book comes to me slightly too late. But I was happy to buy it as soon as Claymore Books got off the ground. So mine’s not review copy, either. I purchased this one, and I’m happy to do so and I recommend, before we finish, I recommend that everyone else does the same thing.

 

Mark Collett: Okay! Well, as, you know, I’m not really a reader. I’m not somebody who enjoys reading. I’m not somebody who can sit down for hours going through a book. And as in the past I have been quite critical of some of the longer books, and quite enjoyed some of the shorter books.

 

And I’m a fan of what is known as a “toilet book”! And a toilet book is not a book that should be flushed down the toilet! But is a book that you can, in fact, read on the toilet. Now that means you can pick it up, you can leaf through it. And you can pull out bits of information that you need, or read a couple of pages at a time, put it back down, and then pick it up a little bit later, without losing your place in the book, or forgetting where you are.

 

[15:08]

 

I remember I once wrote a Stephen King novel, called Needless Things, or something needless things. It was a needless things, as I didn’t finish it. It was called Needful Things. I did enjoy it. But the chapters were so long that it just took so much effort to read them. And if you tried to read a chapter in multiple parts and sleep on it, you’d kind of have to jump back a few pages to remember what you read.

 

And this is the very opposite of that this is like a handbook that you can pull little bits of information out of and if you wanted you could read it in one session, or you could read it in 100 little sessions, as I said, like a toilet book, and you wouldn’t lose anything either way. And that gets my thumbs up! That initially makes me very happy. So if you haven’t got a lot of time you can buy it. It’s quite a short book as well, which is good.

 

It’s not a book which is padded out with rubbish. It is all killer, no filler! This isn’t a book that’s just padded out with extra bits that you don’t need. And it’s one of the few books we’ve reviewed on book club that actually covers something that people always ask me.

 

Now when I started doing my long form shows. And by long form, I mean, the shows like This Week On The Alt-Right [TWOTAR], which then morphed into PWR. And I remember doing those shows. And I always get asked, still to this day, get asked:

 

“Mark, how do you present an argument? How is it best to talk to our people? How can we introduce our ideas to normies, in the best way possible?”

 

And that’s something that’s very important. And I think this book answers that question. This book helps anybody who is sat around a dinner table, … Now I would say this is primarily sort of about debates between liberals and nationalists. And that’s what it says on the back. It says:

 

“Debates between liberals and nationalism, not about logical finding the truth. Their struggles for dominance.”

 

But how many people do you know, or you might even be one of these people, who sat at a dinner table with friends, or relatives. And somebody at the table will pick an ideological fight with you. Somebody at the table will, I’m not going to say kick off, but start throwing insults at you, or jibes, or trying to rip you apart in front of the other guests.

 

Now this is the book you need to read to answer that person! This is the book that gives you an answer to everything. And it doesn’t give a dry answer. And by a dry answer. I mean, it doesn’t answer everything with oodles of statistics.

 

Now statistics are good, because they back up your point. But they’re very difficult to remember. You know, think back to being at school. If you went into an exam, and you had to remember sort of a list of percentages, or statistics, or pure facts, that’s very difficult to do. But remembering a theory, then applying that theory to an example that’s posed to you in an exam paper, is much, much easier.

 

And I felt that this book totally strays away from, well 13% [blacks] commit 56% [crime] kind of thing. And instead goes towards arguments that I would use. Short analogies, little quips. Things that you could say to people that would make everyone at the table laugh! That would make everyone at the table see your point of view. And without being rude you would actually manage to demean the person you’re arguing with. And that’s very important, because nationalists have spent years being very, very polite, and being on the defensive.

 

When I debate people I’m not particularly polite. And I’m not ever on the defensive. I’m always on the offensive! I’m always looking to silence them, to talk over them, to push our points. Because that’s how you win those debates.

 

And somebody so rightly said tonight when Tommy Robinson ended up with Piers Morgan, he allowed Piers Morgan to bully him. And I wouldn’t have done that. I would have come back with something cutting. I’d have come back on the attack.

 

And I’ve got to say this, because it’s topical at the moment and not everyone will like the guy. But at the moment in the news there’s a guy called Mick Lynch. I don’t know how many of you are sort of familiar with this guy. He is the head of, or the leader of the RMT Union. He’s doing the rounds at the moment justifying the rail strikes, because they’re causing a lot of pain for normal people. But he believes in his cause.

 

And I’m not saying whether his cause is right, or wrong. But he is a master at debating! He’s a master at humiliating people! And he completely humiliated Piers Morgan the other day, on Piers Morgan’s new show. To the point where Piers Morgan is basically blocking anyone on Twitter who’s mentioning it. Because everyone’s laughing at him and roasting him. And that’s the kind of thing that nationalists need to do.

 

And I’m going to say this and this will probably please Kenny more than anyone. It might please a few other people listening. But if Nick Griffin [chuckling] had read this book, or had this book before his disastrous Question Time performance, we could be living in a very different timeline now!

 

Because when nationalists go out to debate they have to be able to quip. They have to be on point. They have to be able to present their ideas in a very, very emotional way that pulls on people’s heart strings, gets people laughing at the person they’re debating with, and fundamentally connects on a level deeper than just dry facts and figures.

 

And as such, I’ve got to say, and I usually leave my recommendations to the end. I’d recommend this to anybody who has asked the question on PWR, or TWOTAR before it:

 

“Mark how do I sell our ideas to the public? How do I sell nationalism to people around the family dinner table?”

 

Well, this is how you sell it! It’s a phenomenal handbook. And if you want to get on the debate scene. If you want to be a public face of a nationalist movement, if this isn’t in your library, you’re doing yourself a disservice.

 

Now let’s go around the group and we’ll discuss the book in a little bit more detail. Kenny, obviously you are not Charles Chappelle, or Chapel, or however he pronounces it. Do you actually know the author?

 

[22:20]

 

Kenny Smith: No I don’t. He’s a French Canadian, who is in a bit of bother with the authorities over there at the moment. And has not basically responded to any attempts of communication. So I have got a section in The Forward, where we’re basically saying:

 

“Get in touch. We love your work. We’ve republished it, because it’s impossible to get. And we’ll sort you out if you’re wanting royalties from it.”

 

So yeah, we’re putting it back into service, because it is such a great book.

 

Charlie Big Potatoes was the first man to tell me about it. And said that he’s one of these newer guys in the movement who is fantastic at debates, as well. He’s taking on Muslims and lefties and all sorts, and always done fantastically well. And he does it with a smile on his face! He doesn’t lose his cool. And some of his put downs are fantastic!

 

And I was talking to him about it, and he recommended this book. And we could only get PDFs on the internet. So I tried for months reaching out to this fella, we knew who he was, and just had no response. But I think it may be to do with his legal bother. So maybe when that’s resolved he’ll get in touch.

 

But yeah, for me, this book does all these things. Debates as mean [words unclear] has said to me, one of the chaps from PA Talk, where we refine points among friends, this book teaches us that the enemy is there to be crushed! And that’s what we have to do!

 

Their arguments are repetitive. They are the same all the time. They look for victimhood status, they rely on emotions and feelings. And quite often mask their true agenda. And that usually gets unmasked when they’re dealing with us, because they become extremely hostile. And we can use that to our advantage. And this book is brilliant for teaching that.

 

And one point I’d like to pick up what Laura said earlier. Yes, this book does come from a North American perspective. I think the author’s French-Canadian. And when they talk about things like:

 

“Oh, you Americans, you stole the Indians’ land!”

 

We can still use that same argument, and that same idea, the rebuttals that are in this book. Because from a UK perspective, we get told about colonialism. We get told about:

 

“Oh you went to India and you stole the land! And you stole these resources! And you treated people abysmally!”

 

It’s all nonsense. But this book is more about teaching the methods of how to deal with these people. And that really they’re quite repetitive in their arguments. There is a pattern to it. And we just have to tailor our response to deal with that.

 

So there’s a lot of things in the book that do come from a North American perspective. They’ve got a different constitution from us. And the Right wing is very religious as well. And you see elements of that in the book. But it’s the way we deal with these things. And with the way we respond with these things, on the front foot. And quite often what I love is just it’s the combativeness of it! It’s being aggressive and standing up, just as you were saying.

 

And you had to go back to touch on that Question Time. That was one of the lowest points in the movement for me. And something with that if he had brought this approach, would have been absolutely fantastic! Because nationalism should promote dominance, should promote confidence, because what we’re saying is standing up for our people! We shouldn’t be cowed and apologizing for anything! And this book is brilliant.

 

[26:40]

 

Mark Collett: So I’m going to go around the group now and say, what was your favourite, like going through this, obviously some of the talking points you might know, some of you wouldn’t. What was your favourite talking point in this book? And we’ll start with you Laura.

 

Laura Towler: Oh gosh! I’m not sure if I have a favourite one. I’ll just read out some of the headings. So that the audience can get an idea of what’s covered. So there’s politics. So nationalism, democracy, freedom, capitalism, and Libertarianism, use of violence, and helping the Third World. And then we’ve also got things like feminism, religion, homosexuality. And then there’s a chapter called “other perversions”. And then there’s a race chapter. So racial differences, diversity, jews, White genocide, White pride. And then there’s a miscellaneous chapter at the back.

 

[Image] Table of Contents of an earlier version (V 1.3) of the book.

 

So it covers everything really! And they are topics that we talk about. So I think it was a good few months ago now that I read it. So I can’t remember which arguments come from this book and which ones were from other places. But any topic that you will get into a debate regarding as a nationalist, it’s covered in this book. So yeah, that’s how I’ll answer. I’ll pass it back.

 

Mark Collett: Okay. Natty over to you.

 

Natty: Yeah, I was going to let Sally go first. But I don’t really have a favourite rebuttal to a single argument.

 

But one of the best chapters, well. One of the best sections in here is the rebuttal to human rights. And it’s very topical at the moment, because in this country we’ve got the whole channel crossing illegal migrants in dinghies, pony show with the ensuing flights to Rwanda. But again, it’s just theatre. And some of the underpinning political arguments are focused around the human rights issue.

 

And then in America, which I know this book is kind of more geared towards, although it only shows in a very, very few areas, the whole Roe vs Wade retracting in the Supreme Court. Human rights, again just before I go into this. The rebuttals to these arguments. The arguments may be one sentence long, okay.

 

So for instance, if I just turn to a random page here:

 

“Argument: You’re being racist!”

 

That’s it. And then the rebuttal is maybe two sentences. So there’s a few rebuttals here that you could just use. Number one:

 

“Everyone’s racist! We all understand that there are different kinds of people, and we treat them differently. It’s just that some people are comfortable with that, and accept it as part of life. And others feel guilty and are in denial!”

 

That’s it! That’s an argument against you, and a rebuttal you can use. And there’s a couple more rebuttals in here.

 

The point is, for most of these subjects, it’s covered in such a way that you don’t have to know. The replies are instinctual. And with human rights, the whole human rights section of the book, it leans into the fact that it’s just who holds power. Human rights is just this invention by Europeans to ensure that we try and treat each other nicely, and decently.

 

[30:08]

 

And when you try and map it on to Africans, or South Americans, or people who have no concept of what our idea of human rights is, it just becomes a power struggle. A power game of those in power what you can impose on those who aren’t in power.

 

And to point that out to people, especially now. And for most of the topics, and most of the kind of 24-hour news cycle focuses around something that will involve the base argument about what we can do to each other, and what we can’t do to each other, due to human rights. It’s really good on just being able to take that stuff apart and rip into people who use it as a shield against policies that hurt White people, and hurt Europeans.

 

Mark Collett: Okay. Sally did you have any particular favourite parts of the book? Was there anything in the book that you thought was really sort of eye-opening for you in the way it was presented?

 

Aunt Sally: Yes. Definitely. I’ve got so many notes, because the others have read the book before. But I’ve read it this last week. And I’ve got so many notes on it.

 

But I think the chapter on society was my favourite. I’ve actually written that down and there’s so many notes just from that. But the feminists put downs I thought were really good. There’s one here:

 

“Women are oppressed by men.”

 

“You must really have contempt for women if you think they’re these fragile, spineless, children, who must be protected from men by government regulations. And you really must have a dark view of men if you think they will conspire for thousands of years to keep women in servitude, while living with them, raising children with them, and growing old together! I think you’re a completely disconnected from reality! You seem to hold everyone in contempt!”

 

I like that one! Yeah. There’s so many I’ve got there.

 

Natty: It’s funny isn’t it? Because loads of these responses, quite a few of them, have this kind of humourous edge to them as well. And if you think about, I mean because I know that these people as well. If you think about the way Charlie Big Potatoes argues, or the Ayatollah, or even Mark, and Laura, they’ve got slightly different styles.

 

But you can see where the strengths are. And Charlie’s ability to laugh off quite pointed, or attacking questions. Or the Ayatollah’s aggressiveness! When he goes on someone who’s just being like rabidly anti-White.

 

So it’s having that aggressive response that makes someone feel really stupid! When you read that in the responses, is like humourous as well as enjoyable to listen to.

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah. I mean, there was another one as well, I really liked. Well, I can’t find him.

 

Natty: Well, I’ll just say while you’re looking for it. I know Mark you said about the dining room table and maybe someone attacking you for your nationalist beliefs, while you’re sitting around the table. But most of us will have been, like you said, most of us would have been in that situation.

 

But even when you’re like a school kid you could probably remember a time when there was a group of you standing around. And maybe you’re getting roasted for something, or maybe you’re the one doing the roasting. And you feel so small, and you’re getting like laughed at, whatever it is. And it doesn’t have to be, I’m not saying it’s like a bullying thing. But you’re being dominated verbally for whatever reason.

 

The ability to kind of change it around and then bring the audience back onto your side, this is what that book is about! Because it’s not so much about educating whoever you’re arguing with. The book recognizes that it’s going to be someone who’s arguing with you in bad faith, and is attempting to make you look bad, make you look like an evil person, and to attach all these labels to you.

 

The idea is to just bring whoever’s listening onto your side, and make them look stupid! And make them look foolish! Make them look evil! And everything that they’re trying to you is just put it right back on to them. Like you said, without the use of statistics, or graphs, or studies, the famous Vaush and Destiny claims:

 

“Have you got a study to back that up? Have you got a study to back that up?”

 

Well, it just bypasses all of that.

 

So it’s an enjoyable thing to read. Like I said, it’s a textbook to have this on hand if you were going to go into a Telegram debate. Even if you were just to go into oneness practice, look at some of the arguments in there, and say, one of the Tommy Robinson chats, or maybe the Reverend Simon Sideways’ chat. And then just go through and formulate and look through this book and have a look the kind of things you would respond to.

 

[35:02]

 

Aunt Sally: I found that one that I was just saying:

 

“Good and bad depends on culture. You’re just Eurocentrist!”

 

And rebuttal is:

 

“I judge things according to European values, European ethics, and European culture! You can call that Eurocentrist, if you want. What values are you using to judge the world? Chinese Taoism? The tribal laws of the Bantu? We better settle this before moving on.”

 

And then there’s a reply:

 

“I’m a humanist. I don’t require Eurocentric views.”

 

That would be their reply. And yours is, I like this:

 

“Humanism is the most European ideology there is! Good luck finding humanists in the jungles of the Congo, or mountains of Peru!”

 

I like that one. Yeah, I’ve got so many notes on it. And you have to memorize these things I’m gonna read this book over, and over, again. And probably highlight the most common things. Like the common one, which is:

 

“There’s good and bad in all races.”

 

And all that sort of thing. Just work work my way through the book and save the best responses, and adapt them to my own.

 

Kenny Smith: I think that’s the nail on the head Sally. The key is not just to memorize word for word what’s in these rebuttals, it’s to tailor them to your own needs, in their own unique circumstances, depending who you’re debating with.

 

My personal favourite from the whole book is quite early on. But where it says that the argument is:

 

“The whole world is becoming multi-ethnic. It’s the future! Get used to it!”

 

And the rebuttal is:

 

“The world is not becoming multi-ethnic! White countries are becoming multi-ethnic, and nowhere but White countries! And the average White person is intelligent enough to know that they have been displaced by these immigrants. Only degenerate weaklings would embrace that, and get used to it!”

 

I absolutely love that! And I used that oh dozens of times on Twitter before I finally got banned. And pretty much every time they responded to, I mean, I was putting in things like that like “limp wristed, degenerate, weakling”, and things like that [chuckling]. And that ended up is what they would focus on. So they would attempt to change the debate away from the fact that it’s only in White countries and pick on that, I would call them weak. And I said:

 

“No, never mind how weak you are, you tell me that this is happening in black countries, or Asian countries?”

 

And the book is full of wee devastating things like that. But it’s tailoring them to your own needs and depending on who you’re debating with that’s the key. Learn the rules, learn the pattern. And then do what suits you.

 

Natty: Can I just expand, just very quickly, just cap off what you were saying there Kenny?

 

Mark Collett: You and Sally, go for it! You sound like you’ve both got loads of notes. I mean, I find it fascinating hearing what you said. Because obviously I spend a lot of time doing these big debates and things like that. And Laura does as well. So hearing from people who don’t engage in that kind of thing. And what you found off the book is fascinating. So both of you please carry on.

 

Natty: Yeah, I just wanted to just Mark what Kenny said there. This is from the conclusion. And the conclusion is only, a page and a half. It says, and this is something that we should all remember. I mean, you can have this book, or not have this book. But this is something that should be instilled into anyone who’s even interested in this subject, like Kenny was saying:

 

“Make no mistake! The overwhelming majority of Whites are concerned about the waves of hostile immigrants flooding into their country. They are also horrified at the degeneracy being promoted on television and in movies. They are silent, because they believe they are alone and isolated. But that is where we come in.”

 

And then it goes on from there. But that’s just to kind of say what you’re saying there Kenny is true. We’re not alone, but people feel isolated. So to be able to say this stuff, and say it proudly, clearly, with purpose, whilst at the same time making making our enemies look stupid, is no small thing!

 

Aunt Sally: There’s another one there, as well, that I really liked. This is really common one:

 

“Diversity is our strength!”

 

And the rebuttal is:

 

“Which group is stronger? A group of strangers speaking different languages, or a close-knit family?”

 

You can’t argue. Who can argue with that?

 

Natty: That’s even smaller. That’s an even shorter response than the normal one.

 

Aunt Sally: That’s my note. So that’s probably me abbreviating it.

 

Natty: No the usual response to that is about the football team. And if you’ve got a football team where everyone’s doing their own thing, versus a football team where they’re all working together, who’s gonna who’s gonna win? But the response in here is even shorter, and more succinct, more appropriate.

 

[39:58]

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah. I mean, reading the book I found myself wondering if you’d written the book, Mark. And if you and Laura had written the book, because it’s a definite masculine style of debating in the book. When Laura debates, and I watch all your debates, you are Laura, what’s it? You call her a hammer in a sock, a sledgehammer in a sock. Because she comes out, …

 

Mark Collett: A lead hammer in a silk glove [chuckling]! It’s a snooker ball in a sock, Aunt Sally!

 

Natty: [Laughter] Sorry!

 

Natty: You’ll be in a prison beating with a snooker ball in a sock!

 

Aunt Sally: What was I thinking? I think I watched the film Scum a couple of weeks ago. Yeah, I forgot what I was gonna say now. But when Laura debates you come out with you have these facts and figures in your head to throw at them. It’s a more feminine way I think of doing it is having the facts and figures, because no one can argue with them. Whereas Mark you are quite aggressive when you debate.

 

But I like the gentle path, the gentle way that Laura does it. But I’d love to see that sort of book written by you too. And that’s why I kept wondering, like what would Laura say? And what would Mark say to this sort of, …?

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, well there’s one thing I really liked in the book. My favourite was this. It says:

 

“Argument: If something is done between two consenting adults is none of society’s business.”

 

“Rebuttal: If two consenting adults make a campfire in the privacy of their own bedroom, it’ll definitely be society’s business when the house burns down, and damages the surrounding buildings. People these days have no sense of responsibility. Acts have consequences!”

 

“Reply: What consequence does it have if two people do S&M stuff?”

 

“Rebuttal: People with mental problems need to seek help, if they don’t, it will be a bad influence on society!”

 

Now I found that really humourous. And I think the campfire analogy is pretty funny! And I think that’s the kind of thing that I like, because when you get people laughing, it’s hard to dislike somebody, who makes you laugh.

 

And I remember watching a debate. I actually forget what the guy’s name was. And I feel really bad saying that now, because he’s a really hilarious guy. He used to help nationalists with their IT work. And he’s got a funny name which is sort of an abbreviation of a name. He’s a well-known hacker, and internet trouble causer. I forget his name. It’ll come back to me. He had a really interesting YouTube channel at one point which has now been taken down.

 

And I remember seeing him in this debate on whether you should wrap your children in cotton wool. And he was coming out with stuff. And it was just so funny, everyone was laughing! And the people that were trying to belittle him then, couldn’t! Because the audience was just thought he was so funny. That from that point, they couldn’t help but like him.

 

And I think that has a real level of effectiveness. And laughter is sometimes underestimated. And this did give me a few chuckles during reading it. And I think that is something that is really important.

 

[43:26]

Laura Towler: Mark did you read this before you and I debated those two young American lads?

 

Mark Collett: Oh, no, no! That night, …

 

Laura Towler: Because you were brutal that night!

 

Mark Collett: I was brutal. And I’ve got to say they were two absolute divs. And the things they were saying, … What they were trying to do was bring an argument down to a level where it can’t be won. So we would say something like:

 

“Look, when it comes down to it, if you grow your population endlessly there is going to be a greater fight for resources.”

 

There’s going to be a greater level of scarcity. And, as you increase scarcity prices always rise. And obviously we’ve seen that in the UK. We’ve seen a huge rise in house prices as the population booms. I mean, last year alone, Boris Johnson let in a million people!

 

Well, if you’re letting in a million people the argument is some of them will leave. Well they might do. But while they’re living here they’re all going to need a place to live. Well, if every year a million extra people are needing places to live in the UK, that is going to cause a massive scarcity of rental properties, of land, of houses on the housing market. And all of that will drive prices up. That’s a common sense argument.

 

So when somebody comes back at you with:

 

“Oh, do you have a learnt report from an anti-White university to back up that idea?”

 

The answer is not to get bogged down in that. That’s just to then insult the person, belittle them, and call them out for being an idiot.

 

Because, if you actually go down their road and start looking for a learnt report from Finkelstein and Shekelberg, that backs up the common sense argument, pro tip! There isn’t going to be one! And they will keep saying things like:

 

“Hey! We’ve got a peer-reviewed paper that backs our ideas up!”

 

Well yeah, Dr Shekelberg has come up with this crazy idea that the more people living in an area, actually, that reduces house prices, because, reasons! And then he passes it to Mr Finkelstein, who peer reviews it, and says:

 

“You know what Shekelberg? I’ve never heard such a brilliant theory! House prices are pushed down the more people come into an area!”

 

Well, that’s your peer-reviewed paper. It’s written by somebody, and reviewed by somebody, who have an activistic hatred for people of European descent! And once you’re in that playpen, once you’re in that ring, of arguing based on who can find the most peer-reviewed papers from anti-White institutions that back up anti-White ideas, well, no nationalists winning that argument! It’s impossible to win that argument!

 

Because the argument is stacked against you, because there’s nobody at university who agrees with us. Well there might be a couple of people. But they’re certainly not writing papers. And if they did they’d never achieve peer-reviewed status. Because they’d be putting forward talking points that the people who run the universities don’t want to talk about! And that’s why I made the point during that debate, and a lot of people:

 

“Oh Mark! You weren’t professional! You didn’t have all you didn’t have all your peer-reviewed papers there!”

 

Well, that’s because there isn’t any. And I did say during that these are the kind of things where if I say:

 

“Grass is green.”

 

There will be somebody at this university who says:

 

“No! It’s blue!”

 

And they’ll find somebody to back it up. They’ll say.:

 

“Yeah, it’s blue.”

 

And I’ll sit there saying:

 

“Well, I can see it’s green. Everyone can see it’s green. This is observable to anyone. It’s a common sense point, but the peer review papers say the opposite!”

 

And that’s why this book’s important, because it doesn’t get bogged down in that naval gazing! Where you’re actually looking for something that you’ll never find, because no nationalist will ever ever find one of these peer-reviewed papers that backs up their point.

 

Because the people writing them hate us! And they’re not real science! They’re not real academia! Because academia and science has now been completely captured by people who are pushing an agenda. So when the science, or the academia, doesn’t back up their feelings, and their political viewpoint, it just gets absolutely discarded.

 

That’s why you’ve got entire sections of science such as race and IQ, the link between IQ and civilizational development, that have just been developed over, you know, decades, or centuries, but have just been completely thrown aside within a short number of years, because they don’t fit the current political views of those running institutions. So again, that’s why I find this book so interesting.

 

And also I do kind of like being brutal to people when I debate them. And the reason I like being brutal, and just humiliating them, and getting the audience laughing, is because when you look at Piers Morgan, and people like that, usually they do win their debates.

 

And how do they win them? Well they don’t always win them by putting over the best talking points. They win them by getting their opponents on the back foot. And unfortunately I’ve seen numerous nationalist leaders get to the highest pinnacle of TV representation, whether that be GMTV in the morning, or Question Time in the evening, and completely crack!

 

Because instead of coming out swinging, they go on the defensive. Now ultimately you’re never, ever, going to win a fight by putting up your hands and hoping to block every blow coming in, or dodge every blow coming in. The only way you win a fight is by landing blows yourself. And every nationalist that has been schooled in debate. And they’ve been just they’ve been schooled by somebody who’s told them:

 

“You will win by being the nice guy, and going out there and being meek and mild and playing the victim, and being kicked around for 45 minutes.”

 

Well, that’s not the right kind of schooling. That’s bad advice! And this book gives the opposite it! Gives good advice. And I think it’s certainly got me laughing.

 

Aunt Sally, you said you’ve got loads of notes. So I do want to hear these notes, because in the past sometimes you haven’t been able to say all the things you’ve wanted to say due to technical issues. But tonight we have no technical issues.

 

Aunt Sally: Oh, I’m just looking at the moment. Hang on.

 

Kenny Smith: While Sally’s hunting, can I just say, Mark, you’d actually spot on there! I’ve heard for years “the truth will prevail” mantra. And it’s utter tripe! It doesn’t! You have to win and dominate the argument.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I remember seeing Nick Griffin on Question Time. And they kept asking him about the “Holocaust”. And he kept coming out and saying:

 

“Oh, I can’t say. I can’t say. If I say something about the “Holocaust” I could be extradited to Germany, I could be extradited to Germany.”

 

And he thought that was a good argument. So he had Jack Straw on the panel, who was the Home Secretary. Jack Straw said:

 

“I promise you. I give you my word, as Home Secretary, that you can say whatever you want for the next 45 minutes, and I will make sure you are not prosecuted. Tell us what you really think.”

 

Now that was a dangerous thing for Jack Straw to say, because Jack Straw was saying:

 

“Do as you please.”

 

But at that point, Griffin was exposed! Because he wasn’t saying, I’ll be extradited to Germany, I’ll be extradited to Germany, because he really thought he’d be extradited to Germany! He was saying that, because he didn’t want to answer the question. And Jack Straw gambled on the fact that Griffin didn’t want to answer the question. And when he gave him his assurance, and Griffin still didn’t answer the question, everyone burst into laughter! [garbled] Jack Straw said you can say whatever you want. [chuckling]

 

Well, I would have, … I think at that point I’d have taken my jacket off, rolled up my sleeves, and it had been 45 minutes of pure, [chuckling] unadulterated madness! That would have been clipped out and replayed on YouTube, Telegram, Gab, wherever, for eternity! Because I’d have gone to town. And, even if I felt I hadn’t been able to go to town, I would’ve thrown something to him. Such as:

 

“Well, if you believe in the ‘Holocaust’ so much, if you believe that six million people really were exterminated by the Nazis, why is it illegal to question this, because if it’s so true, why does the truth fear investigation? And why is everything else that’s happened throughout history, all the other mass murders, the tens of millions killed by communists in Eastern Europe, the tens of millions of Chinese killed under Chairman Mao, why do the killing fields of Cambodia, why are all of those things up for debate? Why are numbers constantly debated? But the ‘Holocaust’ is the one thing you can’t debate. What makes that so special?”

 

And you’d throw it back to them! You would, if you don’t want to answer a question, there’s always a way to throw it back, without directly answering. But obviously there’s so much to say on those things.

 

But Jack Straw got people laughing at him. And once people were laughing at him there was no come back. There was no way, there was no way to pull back from that.

 

Because once, … And just remember, what happens at school might seem to be something that’s a long time away, especially when you’re my age, I’m 41. You might think the classroom and being at school is a long time away. But people don’t actually change that much from school.

 

When you’re at school you act in a certain way. And you more, or less, act in an instinctive way you do things more instinctively. Now, as you get older, you still have those instincts but you bury them and you become slightly more polite. But in the right circumstances those instincts do come out.

 

If you remember in class when there was a guy humiliating another kid and everyone was laughing, once everyone was laughing at that kid there was no way he could make a comeback. Even if everything he was saying was right! Even what even if what was being done to him was unfair. Once the whole class was in fits of laughter at someone else, that someone else, the only way they could get out of that was wait till the bell rings and come back the next day and start again. Because everyone was giggling at them.

 

And that’s what happened on Question Time. Jack Straw gambled on making everybody laugh. But he also knew the psychology of people. That deep down we all have those instincts that we had as children. It’s just we bury them. And if you can bring them back to the surface. [chuckling] And you can get everyone acting in that sort of mob mentality, as they do at school, well at that point whoever’s on the beating, or on the receiving end of the beating, they’re absolutely done for! That is what you have to do.

 

And that’s why when I was debating those young lads, the audience were mainly people of Zoomer age. It was all Nick Fuentes audiences, on Nick Fuentes’s platform. And at the time that was the second most watched stream ever. And when it came to the vote at the end, who won the debate, me and Laura won 100%, because we got everyone laughing. Once they were laughing, there was no turning back the tide.

 

Laughter is an important thing. Facts and figures are also important to back up your argument. But they’re dry and boring! And normal people respond more to laughter and emotion than they do just tides of facts and figures.

 

Now Sally, have you got your notes, because I’m eager to hear them.

 

[55:47]

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, there are so many! It’s like which one do I pick? There’s one here. The argument is:

 

“Now we’re liberated from all those traditions, old traditions, we’re free. I don’t want to be constrained like we used to be. Our old European traditions and customs that have all gone.”

 

And the rebuttal:

 

“Our ancestors weren’t idiots! Those old traditions have been devised over thousands of years and we kept them, because they worked. The purpose of these traditions is to promote society in which people are safer and happier. The traditions protected us against our own childish inclinations. We threw it all away to get a little bit of fast living in our youth. And as a result our civilization is on the brink of destruction. Whilst the fast livers will be rotting in old folks homes, with no kids to support them, no spouses to share their old age. And no one but employees paid by the government to take care of them. What a mess.”

 

Yeah, I really like that one, because I’m in my early 60s, and I’m seeing it now of people that didn’t have children, or they were lousy parents, you know, fathers split up, and whatever. And didn’t bring up their children.

 

Now, they’re old and no one cares about them. They’re the ones that are in old folks home, and being abused, and god knows what. And it’s all because, really, if you track it back to our traditions, … When I was a child old people weren’t abandoned like they are now. So yeah, I really like that one. I don’t know what anyone else thought of that.

 

Natty: That’s the kind of argument made by someone who regrets maybe their decisions in life, like you say, ends up childless, drinking wine, surrounded by cats! For instance, right? Rather maybe as opposed to a Lefty, or a liberal, who’s making those kind of arguments. But it’s certainly true.

 

It’s right to point out, you know what if 50 years worth of change and the promotion, or even less, you know, 20 years, whatever it is. Five years. The heavy promotion of transgenderism, sodomy, homosexuality, single parenthood as just being a fine and equally acceptable way to raise children. It’s just having this terrible effect on society. And it to deny it, it’s just denying reality. I mean, who’s going to argue that:

 

“Well, now we can have a washing machine that’s connected to the internet.”

 

Well, isn’t that great, when families are falling apart, politics is this kind of just giant joke, where nobody feels like they’re represented, at all! And you think about the time my parents grew up. Like you say, Sal, where you could leave your door unlocked, even if you lived in certain parts of London that are now just complete, you know, multi-ethnic ghettos, that you wouldn’t want to step foot in, in daylight, let alone in the middle of the night.

 

That’s why we long to go back. And I think that argument and the rebuttal captures the essence of that.

 

But you think, maybe the people who lived before us were constrained in certain ways, in terms of their behaviour in society, in a way it affected society. Because the lack of the internet meant there would be, unless you wanted to be a hermit and a recluse, which some people were. I mean, to be sure, I know old people now who lived like that, and still live like that, surrounded by stacks of newspapers and train sets. And all the rest of it.

 

But you had to interact with people. And that interaction forced a kind of a social cohesion. And a kind of looking over what everyone else is doing. And if they started doing something that was passed out through generations as to be understood as something destructive, or would lead to destructive things for society, like Mark said, lighting a campfire in your bedroom, you would frown on that. And maybe there would be some tut-tutting from the ladies. And maybe the guys would say:

 

“Sort it out mate!”

 

And give him a nudge, or if he really got out of hand, you know, take him around the back of a pub and fill it in, or whatever. [chuckling] So there were these corrective measures that have just been completely thrown out in favour of:

 

“Do what you want!”

 

I mean, I don’t know if you guys are fans of the Simpsons. But there’s an episode on the Simpsons where this self-help guru turns up in Springfield and he’s on stage selling his latest book about how to be more happy and more successful. And he brings Bart up on stage. And he says:

 

“How did you come up with this amazing philosophy of life Bart?”

 

Bart says:

 

“I don’t know. I just do what I feel like.”

 

And the guy obviously sensing his opportunity, says:

 

“Do what you feel like! Man what a great slogan! Do what you feel like!”

 

And he has a whole town doing what they feel like. And in a matter of days, like there’s no police force anymore. The place is complete anarchy, and everything’s fallen apart!

 

And it seems like that’s just a microcosm of what’s happening in society, or certainly in the West today. Is this kind of “do what you feel like” attitude.

 

Mark Collett: Do, you know what I find really interesting about that? And I’ve got to throw this out, because I think it’s very important. When you actually look at where this “do what you feel like” started. It was actually a guy called Aleister Crowley. And I’m just looking up the quote. He was obviously an occultist, a satanist. And his law. I think it was something as:

 

“Do as what thout will. And let that be the whole law.”

 

And it was basically do whatever you wish, and do it as much as you want, …

 

Natty: Without anyone else, or anything, …

 

Mark Collett: Yeah. And basically, it’s quite interesting that this occultist, this man who lived a very debauched, and bizarre, and fundamentally oddball life. Who dabbled in black magic and all kinds of strange things. He’s sort of someone who really captured the imagination of a lot of artists, a lot of musicians, a lot of people in Hollywood, a lot of rock stars, specifically.

 

And his mantra has kind of fed in to the mindset of Western civilization. That we should just do whatever makes us happy.

 

But by doing so – and I wrote about this in my book – you become more animalistic, and less human by doing so.

 

[62:41]

 

Natty: Of course! I mean, it flows, if you give in to your baser instinct that’s what animals do. I think there’s one in here. I don’t know what page it’s on. But it’s saying:

 

“If gays want to kiss in public, that’s fine. And some animals are homosexuals too.”

 

And the rebuttal is something like:

 

“Well dogs lick their balls in public, [chuckling] but you don’t go around licking your balls in public, or other people’s balls in public! Why would you aspire to be like an animal? Why would you use animalistic behaviour as your kind of defense?”

 

That’s one of the things that we were talking about. For thousands of years the strive to be better human beings and create better societies has been founded on moving away from animalistic tendencies, or controlling them to the point where they don’t become destructive.

 

And that’s not a bad thing. It sounds kind of stifling. But, in fact, it’s liberating to take on responsibility, and not give in to your base instinct. It makes you feel human. It makes you feel alive. The struggle against just living in a pit, and doing nothing, and, you know what people mean when they say “degeneracy”. Not giving into those kind of things, you know.

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, I was going to say that on top of Aleister Crowley, before him there was in the Victorian times, there was, I think her name was Helena Blavatsky. And her protege which was Alice Bailey. And they were very much into all that Alistair Crowley crap, “do what they will”. But I think they were before him. Yeah, of course, they were Victorian.

 

But yeah, they were part of this subversion, definitely. I think from that sort of crowd, the Fabian Society and all that lot. And they probably targeted the famous people of their day that we were on the last book club. The rock stars of their time, the Victorian times. I forget their names. The people that we did the last Book Club. You put his picture up, Natty. What was his name?

 

Mark Collett: Oh God! Yeah. We were talking about the Madar [sp]

 

Aunt Sally: Those people, the poets, and the painters, and those people of their time.

 

Natty: Wyndham Lewis.

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah, Wyndham Lewis. They were undermined by the likes of Alice Bailey and Helena Blavatsky. So it’s been going on for centuries really, this subversion of society.

 

And talking about that there was another argument in the book I really liked, about having children. Because my generation is the one, … I was young in the 80s. I was a child back then in the 80s. And we were the ones, it was very confusing, because we were being, … The propaganda was that we were overpopulating the planet. And I had three children, and I felt really guilty that I had three children, you know. Little did I know. And you had three children.

 

And you were told about all these starving kids everywhere. Literally, it was non-stop starving kids all over the world! And you wanted to help them. And so you didn’t have any. Three was pushing. Having two, one, too many as according to the propaganda. But here it says in the book under the society thing:

 

“Who cares if we have fewer children. The earth is overpopulated anyway.”

 

And the rebuttal is:

 

“Only Whites who are having fewer children. And it’s only non-White countries that are overpopulated. Is Canada overpopulated? Is Australia overpopulated? Are the United States overpopulated? No we’re fine. And if you look at if you took out the non-Whites out of Europe they’d be fine too. The other races are multiplying at an incredible rate. And nothing we can do will change that. The only thing we can change is we will we be part of the future world?”

 

So yeah, I like that. I wish I’d read that when I was 25.

 

Kenny Smith: It’s one of the things that breaks my heart most. That these hand rubbers, the same people that promote all this hedonism and liberalism, are the people that are making European people guilty for having children!

 

And they’re saying we’re overpopulated. Yet they’re opening our borders to all these people from around the world! And, you know, overpopulation doesn’t matter then.

 

It’s one of the sickest thing these people have done to our people! That so many men and women are deciding, they don’t want to bring children into this world. It’s actually horrific!

 

Natty: The worst thing the politicians are busy talking out of both sides of their mouths. Because on one hand they’re berating the fact that there’s not enough children being born in this country, or the population’s too low, we need to bring in more immigrant workers and all the rest of it. Whilst on the other hand promoting, all their newspapers and everything else, telling White people to stop having babies.

 

And there’s a climate emergency, and all this other rubbish! That’s presumably, like you said Sal, been going on for the last 30 years plus. It’s always:

 

“Oh we’re going to be at tipping point in 10 years!”

 

There’s going to be another tipping point in 10 years. It’s always just 10 years off. I think that Down syndrome girl from Scandinavia. What’s her name? Thunberg? Was at Glastonbury over the weekend, spouting off the same thing!:

 

“We’ve only got 10 years!”

 

It’s like, well I seem to remember you saying something similar 10 years ago! Just this rubbish! This scolding of Europeans! The scolding of Europeans wherever they are and wherever they’ve expanded to. Whether it’s South Africa, whether it’s Australia cwhether it’s North America, into just genociding themselves!

 

We know who’s doing it. We know who’s telling them to do these things. But it’s us who are being censored and shut down. All the while the arguments against us that are ceding the ideas of self-destruction, and negation, and horror, and complete disenfranchisement, are just pumped out mainstream! Day, by day, by day!

 

So that people like us have to argue with drones who have one word attacks to try and belittle us, and make us sound crazy. When we’re the furthest people from crazy. We’re the stewards, we have the ideas for the stewardship of the future, of who we are!

 

It’s not going to be up to someone from India, or someone from Pakistan, like Priti Patel, or that other guy the Chancellor, the free form, dwarven, hobbit, Chancellor of the Exchequer, to tell me, in my country, how the future is going to be, or what the future of my people in my country should be.

 

No! That’s completely wrong! It’s wrong on an instinctive level. And to be able to articulate it is no small thing.

 

And to bring it back to the book that’s what this book helps you to do.

 

Kenny Smith: Yeah for me nationalism is a positive message. It’s something that I’m proud of I believe it’s the answer to pretty much all our problems. If you’ve got a sound worldview and ethnonationalism, if you’ve got an answer for anything, put your people first in everything you do! They ask us, have you got a source for this, all the rest of it. You don’t need a source for this. You do what’s instinctively right for your people. And I think what PA does.

 

And what this book also does, in spades, is be brave, and be open! Because, if we take every opportunity we have to discuss these things with the people in our lives, and show that we’re not hiding some dirty little secret, it gives them confidence.

 

I think it was yourself Natty, you said it earlier, this book can give other people the confidence to do these things.

 

I’ve got a lady who works for us, and she originally used to live in the States, and she was actually a Bernie Sanders voter. And I thought:

 

“Oh my goodness! What have we hired here! She’s gonna be trouble!”

 

And she came in one day and she was discussing some charity things. She was trying to get a collection. And my question was this:

 

“Where are these funds going? Are they going to support British charity?”

 

Because for me, charity begins from home. I only give to British charities. And well, she was taken back! And she said:

 

“Oh, Kenny! That’s a really negative attitude! And there’s poor people around the world!”

 

And I said to her:

 

“If you had only a small amount of money. Enough to buy the bare essentials at a weekly shop. Would you feed your family first, or would you feed the neighbours kids?”

 

And you could actually, physically see, the penny drop in her head! And she goes:

 

“Yeah. I’ll feed my family first. But if I’ve anything leftover, I’ll help the rest!”

 

And I said:

 

“Exactly! That’s how I feel too! See, when everybody’s taken care of in this country, I’ll gladly help anything next door, and around the rest of the world. But where we’ve got people starving. Old folk who can’t turn on their heating. Schools that tell you that they can’t afford books. Hospitals that can’t provide right medication for people. I’m not giving one penny to anybody outside of this country!”

 

And she was basically, the rest of the day, she didn’t stop talking about this. How she really actually understood that what charity begins at home actually meant. She thought that was being selfish, people just looking after themselves ignoring others. But no! It’s looking after your own people, your own family.

 

And these are the interactions that we need to have with other people, to make them understand what nationalism is. There’s no point all of us having this understanding, going on to platforms like Telegram, and just chatting amongst ourselves. We have to get out into the real world and put the lessons this book teaches us into action, in the real world.

 

Natty: Yeah. Totally agree! One of the things I mentioned briefly in my intro, was how Roe versus Wade being repealed has got, even people who I know, I mean, I’m on Instagram. And I’ve got friends in there. Some of whom are girls, and women, who are posting stuff about the repealing of Roe versus Wade. And it’s like they don’t know what they’re talking about.

 

And I’ve had an argument with one, or two of them, along the lines of this book. The kind of responses I that I know to give. But it’s like, it’s a surface, it’s a real surface level understanding of the issue. There’s nothing else there! It’s just repeating something for social points, or social acceptance points. Especially if it’s something posting on Instagram, or posting on Facebook, or whatever it is because they feel safe saying it.

 

Whereas the things we’re saying people don’t feel safe saying it. Because the whole of society has been taught not to! So the book is trying to break that conditioning, and saying:

 

“No, no! We’re right! We’re right! We’re right to say this a and it’s acceptable to say these things.”

 

And it may not feel safe, and it’s illusion to not feel that way, and not feel that you can say the things you feel, or the truths that are self-evident.

 

Mark Collett: I agree with that fundamentally.

 

Now we are an hour and 15 minutes into the show. So we have got some Superchats. We’ve got three Superchats and a couple of questions. So we’re going to do those. If you haven’t Superchatted yet. And you want to Superchat, you can do so either through Odysee, or through Entropy. But let’s do some of these. And we’ll do them all, and we’ll answer them as best we can.

 

So Archie gave five dollars. Thank you so much. And said:

 

“Lawrence Summers backed Fink’s claims that nationalism leads to protectionism, and anti-immigration, thus causing inflation in the USA. Because there are not enough people to fill empty jobs. Fink says USA needs to million people per year. We know that the solution is marrying early.”

 

Well, thank you very much. And yeah. I think the argument about mass immigration, sort of aiding us economically, is based on the fact that we have an ageing population.

 

And one of the things that always gets me with the argument of an ageing population, is that we have been told, repeatedly, not to have children! We’ve been told that having children is terrible for us, it’s terrible for the environment, it is terrible for our country as a whole. That we are happier if we don’t do these things. And we’ve been guilt-tripped in many ways into not having children.

 

And then when we don’t have children, we’re told:

 

“Oh, you fools! You didn’t have children! You have to import lots of young, virile, non-White men of fighting age who are gonna come and do all the jobs.”

 

And where has that led us? So thank you for that Superchat. Archie gave another three dollars. Thank you so much. He said:

 

“You’ve all heard Harari talks about the necessity of nationalism to solve big problems. He emphasizes that nations aren’t tribes. He defines a tribe as a group upwards of 200 people, that know each other.”

 

Okay. Thank you very much.

 

Natty: Can I just make a comment on the first Superchat.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah! Yeah! Of course, yeah if anyone’s got anything to comment on these, go for it!

 

Natty: I’m not sure if you’ve seen it, the clip the Superchat was talking about, is Larry Fink of Blackrock, talking about why there’s inflation in the US. And you could expand out to include the UK as well. Basically blaming nationalism.

 

All that is, we know who (((Larry Fink))) is! We know what race he belongs to. We know what ethnicity he is. It’s just him blaming his enemies! He’s doing a version of what’s in this book, where he’s attacking, he’s in a position of dominance, in a meta sense, because he’s got the platform to do that. To sit in this chair of this interview on mainstream television, and attack who he perceives as his enemies.

 

In that case, White, North Americans. You know, European Americans, who would absolutely oust him if they knew what he was about! Knew who he was, and had the political power to do.

 

So so Larry Fink is just doing what we would be doing in his position, right, blaming the other side.

 

It’s the same as when there’s any political issue comes up in this country, the Conservatives will blame the Labour Party, the Labour Party will blame the Conservatives, you know, endlessly! It’s just that.

 

So understand who Larry Fink is. Understand where he’s coming from. And understand why we need to depose people like him.

 

Mark Collett: Thank you. And with a final Superchat from Archie for three dollars. Thanks so much. He says:

 

“The nation is a larger group that finds ways to unite strangers using common stories. What is he avoiding?”

 

Well I think the idea that bringing people together through some kind of common ideas, is really something that’s come about very recently. So only very recently have I heard this and it’s something that seems to be pushed by both liberals, and actually by conservatives. It’s a line that’s held by both sides of the sort of false political spectrum, which tries to lock us out of any form of discourse. And they both say that:

 

“Britain is an idea! America is just an idea! Every nation is just an idea that anybody can come to and fit in with, as long as they subscribe to the idea.”

 

I think that’s completely false! I’m sorry if I’ve misread that one. As well, I’m not sure about the speech that you’re talking about. But I hope I’ve got that right.

 

Kel asked a question for Kenny. And said:

 

“Kenny, you live in a remote White Scotland. Was it a book that caused you to become active in nationalism so long ago, or something else?”

 

[79:19]

 

Kenny Smith: Great question! I did live in probably one of the Whitest place in the whole of the UK. I’m originally from the Isle of Lewis the Western Isles [Outer Hebrides], the most northwesterly island in the country.

 

And we did have a small Pakistani community who were the people that came over with, … They were the very Uriah Heep kind of people. Very humble, nice and polite. But they would come over like with a suitcase full of clothes, and then go around the houses selling it, buying stuff, and then built up. And eventually some of these people actually had stores. And one of them even spoke Gaelic, which was phenomenal when considering that a lot of people from [word unclear] themselves don’t speak Gaelic.

 

But it wasn’t really that. I basically was one of these kids who always supported the underdog. I was a bit rebellious. And I supported Patrick Thistle [chuckling]. Everybody else’s Rangers, you know, Aberdeen and United were popular back then, because they were successful. But I was always kind of a bit rebellious. And I got into the punk movement, which took me into the Rock against Communism scene that the skinheads and stuff like that.

 

And it was actually listening to a bootleg tape of Ian Stewart Donaldson and the words that he said in between the songs that really hit home for me and that I felt. So I then wrote away to a fanzine that was advertising national stuff. And the stuff that Ian was talking about. And I got National Front papers. I got British National Party papers. Went along to my first BNP meetings a little later, and got properly educated by the people I met.

 

But before I actually moved to the mainland, I relied mostly on things like National Alliance publications. There was The Oak from the UK. National Vanguard. I read John Tyndall’s Spearhead. I had a massive collection of these things. I used to get every publication going. Basically I bought lots of books from an early age, in order to expand in my world of view. I very quickly learnt not to be a fascist, because Mosley didn’t deal with the JQ..

 

And yeah, I read a lot of books on socialism a lot of books on nationalism. And so I don’t think there’s what one book did it. It was mainly the words of one man initially, that that spoke to me. And then I learnt, and I read, and I became educated. But that the best lesson that I ever got was from guys like Scott MacLean, Jim Laird, Stevie Cartwright. The BNP officers from Scotland when I first joined were really sensible, screwed on people, who told me:

 

“Don’t be a skinhead. Get serious and be of service to your people, rather than just being a follower.”

 

Mark Collett: Okay. Thank you very much a very comprehensive answer.

 

Saturn Five gave three pounds and says:

 

“Does the panel think that the fundamental change in our favour would be as a result of one major upheaval, a hard smack on the nose, or emerge from several factors?”

 

Well I’ll answer this first. I think this is a really good. I think this is a really good question. What would it take to wake people up? What would it take to get things changing? I think that would need to be a series of converging catastrophes, if you like. I think you’d have to have several things all come together at the same time to make a massive change. So you would need economic, social, and large national issues, all coming together at the same time to bring about change.

 

But saying all that, my outlook is one that this is a fight for the long haul. And I don’t think there’s any immediate answers. And I don’t think there’s going to be a big immediate upheaval that will work in our favour. Because people are becoming less, and less, willing to actually stand up and make a difference.

 

And I’ll give an example of that. It wasn’t long ago that people were protesting, blockading roads, over petrol hitting a pound a liter. Now petrol is hitting two pounds a liter, nobody’s doing anything.

 

And one thing that always bothers me to a certain degree, is that people on the continent seem very willing to do something. They have this revolutionary spirit. It’s almost built into them. So the French, for example, are very willing, even now, years after numerous revolutions, to go out on the street as either the Yellow Vests, or to vote for an alternative form of governance.

 

The best we ever got was UKIP which failed to make any meaningful breakthroughs at a Parliamentary level. And they were so soft, I think if they had got in they would have been completely ineffective, and fallen to pieces as a Parliamentary group.

 

So I think they’d take quite a bit in this country. And it would be a convergence of numerous great crises, all at the same time. What do you think Kenny? Then we’ll go Laura, Aunt Sally, and Natty.

 

Kenny Smith: I’m sorry Mark I wasn’t really paying attention, [chuckling]!

 

Mark Collett: The guy, Saturn Five, asked, he said:

 

“Does the panel think that that fundamental change in our favour would be a result of one major upheaval, or a number of smaller, several factors, all intertwining?”

 

Kenny Smith: Yeah. I don’t think, there’s no going to be any quick fix for this. We’re in for a long, long, struggle. There’s no two ways about it. And for me, that’s why we have to build community. I believe we have to manage the expectations of people in the movement.

 

If you read the history of the movement going back to even to the BUF days and before, they would have massive peaks and troughs of people. And the NF had the same. The BNP had the same. You know, something would happen in the public eye would drive people to us. And these people thought they were in for an instant win! You know:

 

“They just have to stick in for a year. And it’s going to happen.”

 

Rubbish! You have to work for it and win your people over. For me as long as people have jobs, as long as they have their distractions, you know, their TV, their internet, the majority people aren’t going to wake up.

 

And so that means that we have to become positive influences within the community to make that happen. Otherwise I think people this is, … It’s like the boiling frog analogy, isn’t it? As long as the heat isn’t turned up too far, these people will still sit in it and get boiled to death, you know. Yeah, there’s no quick fix. It’s going to be a long painful thing.

 

And we’ve seen in the past with the BNP. The thing that made the difference for communities was we would get activists actually going into communities and making a physical difference in these people’s lives, and a positive impact in these lives.

 

There’s a great story I tell a lot of time from Burnley, that sadly isn’t in Steve Smith’s book. But they went to a housing estate once. And put a whole pile of skips in and put magnetic BNP posters on saying:

 

“These skips are free for the community. Let’s clean up this estate!”

 

You know, they went around leafleting the place. The community absolutely loved it! People filled these things up! I think they had to do it a second time – if I remember correctly – it was so popular! And the enemy absolutely panicked! They sent Labour MPs across:

 

“Oh, don’t vote for the BNP! They’re Nazis!”

 

And basically the community rose up and told them:

 

“Bugger off! Get out of our estate! The BNP are the first people who have ever done anything positive for our lives!”

 

And it seems simple, you know what they’ve done is just clean up a dirty park, or a dirty estate. But that actually made something good happen for these people! They could take their kids to the park. And there was no rubbish, there was no needles, there was no dog poo. They made a positive impact in these people’s lives! And when the enemy comes and starts saying:

 

“Don’t trust people, they’re Nazis!”

 

They’re saying:

 

“We don’t care what you call them. They actually helped us!”

 

That’s for me is where it’s going to count for us. That we actually become leaders in our own communities, and dispel that spell on this. Because., like I said for me nationalism is a positive thing! It’s the answer to all our problems. And we just have to be brave enough and to get out there and spread the gospel!

 

Mark Collett: Laura?

 

Laura Towler: Yeah, I don’t think these big events do wake up the majority of people. Because, if we look at things like the Black Lives Matter riots, a year and a half ago, nearly two years ago, if you didn’t wake up during that, then what is going on? Do, you know what I mean? I think these big events do happen and people trickle over to us. And I do think we grow daily.

 

But I think the majority of people will just take whatever’s the most comfortable option. And if we were in power. And we had the media on our side, then most people would be openly and confidently nationalists. So I think it’s up to a very sort of dedicated, and strong willed few, to lead by example. And then I think eventually most people will come up to our worldview.

 

But I don’t think there’s going to be some massive event where everyone’s like:

 

“Okay I’m a nationalist now!”

 

I don’t think it happens like that. I think it’s like Kenny said, it’s a slow battle. And we see people join Patriotic Alternative and then, because we haven’t secured total victory within six months, they’re like:

 

“Oh I can’t do it!”

 

And they drop out. But there was plenty of those that were there on that first day and we know that this is not going to be solved in five years, or even 10 years. And it’s a really long struggle. That’s why we call it a “struggle”, isn’t it? And I think we need people that have got that that longevity really, to stick it out. So yeah, I hope that answers the question.

 

Mark Collett: Okay. Sally and Natty. What do you think?

 

[90:27]

 

Aunt Sally: I agree with what everybody else has said. The subversion has been going on for a very, very long time! And it’s going to take a long time to undo. And I think the elderly, or the boomers seem to be the worst to try and bring over to our side. They just don’t want to know. There’s a few of us, but not in enough numbers, I don’t think.

 

The target audience, maybe it’s the young, the Zoomers and the Millennials we need to educate more. And it’s hard, because they’ve grown up in the system. They’ve been educated against their own best interests. So I think it’s more education.

 

I know we can’t go into schools and do anything, but education in real life, where we just keep telling other parents what the agenda that’s in the school books, and that’s in the media and the films and stuff. And the more they see that the more they’ll see what’s really going on. That’s what I think anyway.

 

Natty: Well my answer to this is probably slightly black pilling, maybe a bit depressive. But after reading Solzenitzen’s book the Gulag Archipelago, it’s apparent, like Kenny says, with the boiling of the frog, just how compressed you can make people before they do anything. And even then, you get to the point where you put them in a camp and they die from logging duties after three weeks, starvation rations, just how a crumb of comfort can turn people inwards and stop them mobilizing. In the camps, in the Gulags, just a simple comfort like a piece of bread, or an extra shirt to keep you warm at night, was enough to stop people uniting, because they didn’t have anything else. So it’s like:

 

“Well, this is mine now! I have to have to protect myself from my fellow inmates. The other people who are in here with me. I’ve got to look out for myself.”

 

Now on that note, however, I will say that. I was convinced by Gavin Bobby [sp]. I don’t know if you guys remember him. He turned up and he spoke to Chris Dangerfield a year ago, maybe a little bit more than a year ago. And he talked about how things would go downhill quite fast. And he was convinced it was the collapse of the Welfare State.

 

If the government runs out of money, or the government is unable to provide services in the way that they currently do. So electricity, internet, water, you would rapidly see people just tried up, basically. And it would be very messy. And I think this was his thesis. It would be very messy. And over the course of years, a few years, it would gradually sort itself out.

 

And people who were actually responsible. And actually had a thought for the future, rather than the kind of five-year election cycle would come to the fore. By it’s very nature they would be nationalistic. Because they would have spent time looking after the people around them, and gaining enough of a power base to then kind of expand that out.

 

So it’s kind of pie in the sky stuff. But I was fairly convinced by that argument.

 

Mark Collett: Okay. And we have a Superchat from A Coconut Nuts a Big Nut, who gave three dollars, and said:

 

“Dear Mark. What was your wake-up moment? You’re the greatest!”

 

Well, I have to concur with the last part of your Superchat. That is a very astute observation on your behalf. My wake-up call was just living where I lived. I lived in a small village, all White, called Roethly. Community, everyone dead friendly. Biggest major city nearby, Leicester, very multicultural. Compared the two from a young age, from going shopping with my mother in the village, to the butchers, the bakers, the green grocers, the newspaper shop, then going with my mum to Leicester. Wow! Well, you saw the difference.

 

And the difference wasn’t just the level of community, it was the difference in people. And the more diverse you went, the less community there was. And the less you felt at home. And that’s something that lived with me through my whole life. And I just was instinctively drawn to nationalism after being brought up with those two very big differences in my life. So thank you for the Superchat.

 

Max Anderson gave 10 pounds. Thank you so much. And he said:

 

“Counter-Currents had a good podcast recently. They said nationalist organizations could be more like the NRA, with a legislative arm attacking policy, and running ads against candidates they don’t like.”

 

Well, I’ve got to say this. I think one of the big things that’s come about very recently. And it’s not actually PA related. I’ll give credit where credit’s due. One of the big breakthroughs lately within the nationalist community, is the Workers of England, Union. Now I know this doesn’t help our friends north of the border, like Kenny but the Workers of England, Union has been one of the most powerful advocacy groups for people of European descent living in Britain. People who have been discriminated against with the face masks, with the forced jabs, etc.

 

And I think one of the most powerful things that we’ve developed is this legal response. PA…. I’ve obviously helped people with legal responses in other ways. But the Workers of England, Union have been great. And I think the NRA is a good organization to base what we do on, because fundamentally they do apply major pressure.

 

Now, I don’t think our MPs, or our counselors, would listen. But we can apply legal pressure and advocacy to big organizations. And I think that we’ve promoted Workers of England, Union. We’ve obviously had Robin Tilbrook help us with advice for how to deal with the police, and Prevent, etcetera. And I think that legal string to our bow, as nationalists, is something that’s very, very important.

 

And I will say this that groups like the NRA. Groups in America that are advocacy groups do push on the legal front. And that’s something that nationalists haven’t done enough of in the past. I think that’s been a big change.

 

Embrace the Struggle said:

 

“Hopefully Mark reads the chapter on homosexuality and reconsiders his stance on dissident Right individuals, who happen to be homosexuals.”

 

I would say that there are people within the dissident Right who are ultimately providing a good service to nationalism. Now the way I judge homosexuals, is that I think the homosexual lifestyle is rather degenerate, it’s rather deviant. We’re seeing this with the Monkeypox. Their lifestyle is not conducive to being healthy. It’s not conducive to a long life. It’s also not conducive to family values, etc.

 

However, not everybody who is a homosexual leads what we would call “the homosexual lifestyle”. There are homosexuals who do not lead a degenerate life. Who do still think that family values are important. And you do push for the rights of people of European descent.

 

Now if there was a homosexual that wanted to be involved with PA. And I didn’t know they were homosexual, and they kept it behind closed doors. And they didn’t push for it in any way, I would fundamentally not even know they were homosexual. So how would I have an issue with that?

 

Now if there was a homosexual who wanted to join PA and wanted to hand out PA leaflets at gay pride events, and wanted to come to PA Conferences dressed up as one of the village people, that would be something completely different. So I think we have to judge people on their actions.

 

And what I’ll also say is people often like to criticize one particular nationalist author, and activist, and speaker, about his homosexuality. And this guy has done an awful lot for this cause. He’s done an incredible amount for this cause.

 

And one thing I will say. If you’re gonna throw stones at that guy, make sure you’ve done something for this cause which is in some way comparable! Because one thing that always strikes me as odd, is when people in this “movement”, and I say movement in inverted commas, are taken very seriously, very seriously, and they’re faceless, nameless, they hide behind an avatar online, but have all manner of “constructive”, in inverted commas, criticism for those in the movement who actually show their faces, put their necks on the line, and do a lot of work.

 

If you want to have your criticisms, and inputs, taken seriously, you have to in some way prove that you are someone who should be taken seriously. If you want to be taken seriously you have to prove that. And that means you have to put something into the movement.

 

And I do not believe that democracy is the best system. I believe a system of meritocracy is a good system. And meritocracy is a system whereby people who commit to a cause, put something in, and work hard, have more input in the steering of that cause.

 

So I’ve got to say, ultimately when it comes down to it, if you’re going to criticize the guy that you criticized in the Superchat, make sure you’re doing something comparable to his level of input, [chuckling] because he does an awful lot!

 

Bernie, ….

 

[101:12]

 

Kenny Smith: Sorry I think it’s well said Mark. There’s a lot of people who are fond of throwing stones in this wider movement who do absolutely nothing at all! But they aim their slings and arrows are people who do work. And I’m sure that there are probably more homosexuals in the wider movement than people think.

 

I know there were some in the BNP who even stood as candidates, and nobody was aware they were homosexual, because they didn’t behave in a camp manner. They were very discreet about it. You know, they were not people who tried to force homosexuality down the throats of other people. They just were aware that that’s what they were. And I dare say some of them would probably be ashamed of it.

 

But they kept it to themselves, to a degree behind closed doors. They weren’t promoting it. They agreed with the BNP stance and family values. And I bet that there’s probably people still in the movement today, exactly in the same boat. And if they’re doing good work for the movement I’m not going to throw any stones at them.

 

Natty: Well said. I think the other thing is that it, just in general, sexuality as a political position is the kind of underlying issue here, right? Because you wouldn’t want someone who was a leader, or a thought leader, to be out there promoting any sort of sexuality, as some sort of raison d’être, a reason for being, or a reason for pushing political issues.

 

And just to add to what you were saying Mark, that’s to the people who criticize you for your stance on certain things. You’ve got to remember most of the time, like you said, these people are anonymous, they’ve got, you know whatever picture is avatar on Telegram, or any YouTube comment. You don’t know who you’re arguing with.

 

I mean, you can kind of guess sometimes by the kind of things they say, you could be arguing for all you know with someone who looks like Harvey Price, and is probably a few brain cells short of someone like Harvey Price. [Mark bursts out laughing]

 

Kenny Smith: I’m wondering where this is going [chuckling]!

 

Natty: You imagine that you’re speaking with someone who maybe you imagine that there’s some sort of professorial type who’s got their head around all these issues, and knows about all this stuff. But, in actual fact, a lot of the time it’s attention seeking. It’s just nagging, and trying to push buttons and stuff like that. So just ignoring people who are naysayers, or don’t have anything constructive to add, is a perfectly legitimate way to go about things, I think.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah. I’ve also got to say as well, if we were living in the perfect world, then we could legislate for us all to be absolutely perfect! And that would be wonderful, wouldn’t it. But I’ve got to say this. At the moment we are so close to annihilation, turning down talented, decent people who are pushing in the right direction is madness! It would be akin to being on the Titanic and a load of lifeboats turn up. And then you say:

 

“No! No! Turn those lifeboats away! They’re not the regulation lifeboat shade of red. They need to be a couple of shades lighter! Take them away, get them repainted, and bring them back!”

 

Well when you’re in a crisis you take what you get and you work with it, and you attempt to build a movement from what you’ve got. And that’s not me being a defeatist. That’s me being a pragmatist. Because, if we are looking for utter perfection. If we’re looking for a group where everyone agrees with each other on a hundred percent of the issues hundred percent of the time, we will all be in a party of one. And it’s as simple as that!

 

And we’ve got another question here from Kelt. He says:

 

“Everybody, this book is for reposts. What is your favourite first strike argument to win an audience over to nationalism?”

 

Your favourite first strike argument? Well, mine just has to be that we are the indigenous people of these islands. And as such we have a birthright to them. And like any other indigenous people we should not be reduced to a minority in our ancestral homeland. And I think that chimes very well with most people.

 

What do you all say? When you introduce yourself as a nationalist and you lay down your first strike argument, as he said. What is that? We’ll start with you Kenny. And we’ll go around the group.

 

Kenny Smith: Yeah, pretty much what you just said. We are the indigenous people of these islands. And we have a right to be proud of our history. And our heritage. And to govern ourselves. That’s it! It’s about self-determination for our own people. And I’m not going to be ashamed of saying that publicly.

 

Mark Collett: Laura, do you have a take? Or have you got, … Oh, you have because Sam’s away. Bloody hell! Why do you let him get away with this?

 

Laura Towler: Oh, I says to him:

 

“Why have you booked a gig when you know I’ve got Book Club?”

 

And he’s like:

 

“I bought these tickets before me and you got together!”

 

So we bought these tickets years ago, apparently. And it’s like Ramstein.

 

Mark Collett: Oh.

 

Laura Towler: I think it’s been cancelled and delayed and stuff, because of Covid. But yeah. She’s alright she’s just, …

 

Mark Collett: Give him a slap anyway!

 

Laura Towler: [Laughing]. But yeah. One thing that I always do when I’m having discussions with people is I always try and twist it round to another group. So, if somebody says something like:

 

“Why would you be proud of something that you had no control over?”

 

You know, talking about our people. Then I’d say:

 

“Would you say that to Black Lives Matter supporters? Or would you say that to somebody at a pride march?”

 

Or if they say something like:

 

“British? What do you mean? Is it the Angles, or the Saxons, or the Jutes?”

 

I’d say:

 

“Well, would you say to a Japanese person, what is Japanese? And then break their ethnic group down?”

 

And usually when you flip it round to a non-White group, it really does highlight like how anti-White they really are. And I think if you can do that, hopefully they might go away and think about it. But if they don’t, at least the people who were watching saw how things are different for us. And maybe that will encourage them to take their own side as well.

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah I love what Laura just said. And I wish I could remember it when it comes up. But I do sort of tend to say what Mark and Kenny said about it’s indigenous people. It’s about us. It’s our homeland.

 

People are different races, because they belong in different environments, different heats. That’s why people from Africa are black, because of the sun. We belong here. This is our country we absorb vitamin D differently to other races. And they belong there in their own continent. So yeah, that’s where I stand. That’s what I say to other boomers, anyway.

 

Natty: I think the best thing to do is just ask a question. If someone says:

 

“Well, that’s a bit racist!”

 

You say:

 

“What do you mean, racist?”

 

And they’ll just fall apart, straight away, you know what their idea of racism, is like a precursor, it’s just some anti-White claptrap that they’ve heard. And they can’t just say:

 

“It’s discrimination based on race!”

 

Because then you can, that opens them up to all sorts of stuff! So the first thing you can do if you’re ever on the back foot, you’re ever wondering how to respond to someone who’s coming at you for something, just ask them the question. Just turn it straight around on it:

 

“You’re racist.”

 

“What do you mean, racist?”

 

“Well, that’s pretty bigotted of you! You’re a homophobe! You’re a homophobe! You’re a transphobe!”

 

“What do you mean? What do you mean transphobe? Explain that.”

 

And watch how quickly they crumble. That’s the first strike, it’s the best tactic! It gives you breathing room. And it makes them have to think about what they’re saying. Which most of the time they can’t do. Like I said, it’s surface. They have a surface level understanding, of all of these issues, to a much lesser degree than you do. So if you ask them a question, they’ll crumble.

 

Laura Towler: Yeah, I’d just like to add something to that actually. Usually people say stuff. And it’s like, it is just empty words that mean nothing. And if you actually ask them to explain, … I’ll give you an example they can’t do. And I posted on my Telegram channel the other day. Gary Lineker was saying:

 

“Refugees bring skills and talents!”

 

If you said to him:

 

“What skills and talents do they bring that we can’t do ourselves?”

 

I guarantee you he would not be able to say one thing! But they use all these buzz words, and fancy words, and like nice little things wrapped up in bows. But if you actually ask them to explain something, and say:

 

“Oh. Can you give me an example of that?”

 

Nine times out of ten, they haven’t got a clue. They just know what they’re supposed to say. But they can’t actually go in scratch below the surface, or go into any more depth. So yeah, I completely agree with Natty.

 

Natty: Just to add to it people like Gary Lineker and his ilk, have been given immense kind of space, by the fact that nobody is allowed to rebut them. No one who could rebut them, or has the sense, or will, or willingness to rebut them, has any form of presence online in which to do.

 

So Gary Lineker can post something like that, it gets hundreds of thousands of retweets, and likes by, quite frankly, morons! And the people who would slap him down, who deserve to slap him down, are silenced all across the place. So these people’s grip on the kind of national discourse, or international discourse in some cases, is completely astroturf!

 

It’s not real it’s a manifestation of those who hold power over us at the moment. So that’s, I guess I’m just explaining really, why is that they’re allowed to say such stupid things. And how easy it would be to take them down if we were allowed to, or given the space to rebut them.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, I do agree with that. You’ve got these people whose ideas are presented in such a vacuum. And when ideas are presented in a vacuum, they’re much easier to uphold, unless they’re, you know, than being presented in an open environment.

 

Archie gave five dollars. Thank you so much. He said:

 

“The Japanese courts recently said that not allowing gay marriage is not constitutional. But they are LGBT groups pushing for gay marriage, arguing that there are social economic advantages. Global corporations don’t like nations that aren’t LGBT friendly.”

 

Well, indeed. But I do think it’s good that Japan is basically standing up against the LGBT lobby. I think that’s really important. It’s nice to know that there is a developed world nation doing that. I know there are other countries that do. But for Japan to do it, I think that’s a pretty big thing.

 

So we’re getting towards the end of the show. And we’ve answered all of the questions. If anyone else has got any Superchats, or questions, get them in now! Because we are about to round up. And we will now give our final thoughts on the book. And we’ll go around the group.

 

We will start, … We’ll give the final word to Kenny obviously. He’ll tell you where you can get the book. But let’s give Laura, Aunt Sally, Natty, then myself. Let’s have a good round up. All right?

 

[113:02]

 

Laura Towler: Yes. Well I do recommend the book. Like I said, I bought it myself to support Claymore Books. And it’s a good one. It’s sometimes you get books from book club. And it’s like I probably won’t read that again. But I think this is one that I will come back to. And so I do recommend it.

 

And also recommend that you support Claymore Books. And perhaps when Kenny speaks you can tell us what the next book’s going to be? Because it’s an exciting one.

 

But yeah, this book is good for when you’re debating 99% of people that you debate, because they do not debate in good faith. I wouldn’t recommend it if you’re having a conversation with like, I don’t know, like maybe if I was talking to my dad, or my brother, and they wanted to understand something a little bit more, we’d have a more in-depth conversation and go over things in more depth. I wouldn’t use this book for that.

 

But I would use it for like 99% of conversations when people are just trying to catch you out, or humiliate you. This will just stop them in their tracks, and put you into the position of power. And so, yeah I do recommend it.

 

And I just wanted to say, thanks for having me as well. And I’ll be back tomorrow with Sam for tea time. And I pass it to Aunt Sally.

 

Aunt Sally: Yeah. I think it’s a really good book as well. I really enjoyed reading it. And I will read it again, and again. And I probably will leave it in the toilet. Because that’s where the brightest light in the house is to be honest.

 

I think it’s a really good start the book for someone like me who I just get lost! I get slapped down in any debate. I don’t actually want to debate anybody. But sometimes it crops up at family dinners and gatherings. And yeah, I tend to avoid them. But I’ve now got a few sound bites to throw at people. So I’m really grateful to it for that.

 

So yeah, I do recommend it. I really think every nationalist should have one. You really should. It’s a really good book. And thank you for the microphone. And I hope my sound’s been good tonight. Thank you Mark.

 

Mark Collett: It’s been so good Sally, that next episode of book club, you are doing it all on your own. [chuckling]

 

Aunt Sally: Oh yeah! Good luck with that!

 

Mark Collett: Natty, what’s your final thoughts, my friend?

 

Natty: Even if this book was total trash, and I didn’t enjoy it. And it didn’t have any value, I would recommend it just because Claymore Books is a worthy cause! And this is the first publication from Claymore Books. You should be supporting them if you’re a British nationalist in any way, shape, or form, you should buy a copy of this book.

 

However, it is not a crap book. It is totally worthy, a totally worthy book to have on your bookshelf. If you’re even partially on the Right, or even if you’re not fully over, or you’re kind of wavering, whatever. This book is a fantastic edition. And I know that books, a lot of these books, can be compared to funko pops the way that soy boys and manlets collect funko pops, Right-wingers collect books.

 

But this is definitely one for the collection. So 100% recommend! Go to Claymore Books, pick up a copy of this book and you won’t regret it.

 

Mark Collett: Thank you. Well my opinion on this book. I think I’ve made it quite clear I think it answers the question I get asked all the time, or have been asked. We’ve been doing, I think it’s about 263, 264 episodes of my weekly show now. So that’s obviously over, that’s over five years of doing a weekly show every week! It’s a lot of shows. And throughout that five years I’ve often been asked:

 

“How do I argue with people? How do I present arguments to my family, to my friends, to my co-workers? How would you answer this question?”

 

Well, you’ve now got a handy handbook which gives you all of those answers. So buy it! It’s not an expensive book. But it’s worth every penny, in fact, I’d say this is worth it’s weight in gold, if you were to want a book that helps you debate. And these sort of arguments do come up on a regular basis.

 

And I’ve seen nationalists go into debates online, in person, and get completely minced by people who put forward emotional arguments. And they’re just trying to argue in a dry way. And this book arms you with everything to fight back against those arguments, and to completely dominate your opponent with wit, with short snappy answers, with analogies, that will hit home.

 

It’s worth the money, and it really does do something that I don’t feel any other book that we’ve reviewed really does. Which is actually arm our activists with the most important weapon of all, which is the weapon of being able to win the public discourse, whenever you engage in debate.

 

So yeah, and again as Natty said, Claymore Books another nationalist business that does deserve your support.

 

So Kenny! You are the guy behind Claymore Books. So would you like to have the final word, my friend?

 

Kenny Smith: And thank you very much Mark. And thank you Laura, and lovely to speak with Sally and Natty, it’s been a wew while. And I’m so glad that you all enjoyed the book so much.

 

For me we did this in the PA Scotland book club, which is an educational book club. We’ve got a safe curriculum and we do things for a reason. But we laughed so much during this book! We broke it up into his different sections. And we made somebody do the arguments and somebody do the rebuttals. And we have some funny characters in Scotland, who are brilliant at accents. So I’m sure you can imagine [chuckling] how some of the arguments went! But we actually laughed so much, because this book is absolutely brutal against the enemy!

 

Gordon Freeman who’s one of our officers in Scotland, a prolific writer for the website, I was asking the guys, book club, how they found the book. And he was saying that for him, it helped him see and understand the patterns that the enemy have. And they certainly do. And it allowed him to be ready to crush him! And he’s absolutely spot on!

 

If, you know, your enemy, you’ll defeat your enemy. And this book will do that for you. But you have to practice it. Don’t just read it and forget it. There’s loads of nationalist books I’ve only ever read once. And then it sits on my bookshelf. And I say I’ve got it. But I don’t go back to it.

 

But there’s other books, I will read religiously, year after year. And I get different things from them as I age, through my life experience. And this book I think is one of these things. You can dip in and out it.

 

But you must read it, you know, regularly for me, and then tailored to your own needs. And like Laura said it’s not one for the family. Be nice to your family, and friends [chuckling]! Don’t try and belittle them and mock them! You want to win them.

 

I’m so proud that this is our first book, because it is a useful tool in the national movement. I think there are so many books out there for nationalists. And they’re basically telling you the history, or they’re doing a deep dive into some esoteric, philosophical point.

 

This book is practical help! That can help us win the struggle.

 

So yeah, just want to finish off. Thank you very much terribly for the amazing words on the book. And it was a absolute joy to be on the show. And thanks to everybody who was interacting in the chat as well.

 

Natty: Wait. Before we end Mark, before we give your final thoughts. If you want to be able to mash rhetorically for Hebrews, in a debate, and make two of them storm off in rage, this is the book you start with! I’m sure you remember the debate Mark Collett had in 2017, 2018! This book would go some way into helping you be able to achieve such things.

 

Mark Collett: Thank you for those kind words! And yeah, that was a good night! That was a good night. I think tonight’s been a good night as well. I always enjoy our chats with this little group. And we will be back next month.

 

Next month though we have a very different book. We have a science fiction book, set in the future. It’s a nationalist book, but a science fiction novel. It’s one that Natty really is looking forward to, and one that Laura is dreading! So we’ll see how that one works out! I’m looking forward to it, as well.

 

And thank you for tuning in tonight. Thank you to Kenny. Thank you to Laura. Thank you Anne Sally. Thank you Natty. Thank you to all those who donated so generously. Thank you to everyone who tuned in. This community is absolutely wonderful. Laura and Sam will be back tomorrow night for tea time. And I’ll be back on Wednesday with Morgoth for PWR. It’s going to be a good one!

 

Until then, stay strong! Keep fighting! Pick up this book! And I’ll see you all again soon. Thank you and good night everyone.

 

[122:37]

 

 

END

 

top

 

 

============================================

 

 

ODYSEE COMMENTS

top

 

401 comments

[As of Jun 27, 2022]

@MarkCollett
9 hours ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago
The book being discussed this evening can be found here:
https://www.claymorebooks.co.uk/shop/
Reply
2
0

@Sons_of_Odin
7 hours ago
i bought the book just because I love burning arseholes in arguments lol
Reply
2
0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
The book being discussed this evening can be found here:
https://www.claymorebooks.co.uk/shop/
Reply
2
0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
Excellent show that returned to FIRST PRINCIPLES.

@KennySmith
Reply
1
0

@simmons6319.2
7 hours ago
shame on the tribe & their paid shabbos goy-eam for using brown people as biological weaponry against the people who made civilization. the parasitical tribe!
Reply
1
0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
“Anti-Semite!” — “No, I have nothing against the Palestinians”
Reply
1
0

@Sons_of_Odin
7 hours ago
What does Semitic mean? that stops 99% people dead in their tracks too pmsl
Reply
1
0

@BritishGammon
7 hours ago
“racist” is an anti White slur. We should not be afraid of it.
Reply
1
0

@Hobbit-Habit
7 hours ago
“Yes, I’m a national socialist, what of it?”
Reply
1
0

@Dewitt
7 hours ago
The holohoax is just an idea!
Reply
1
0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago
Israel is just an idea!
Reply
1
0

@BritishGammon
7 hours ago
Great answer Kenny
Reply
1
0

@BB
7 hours ago
greetin thumbsperg
Reply
1
0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
Spot on, Kenny. The social side of Nationalism
Reply
1
0

@KennySmith
8 hours ago

@BeerHallPooch
Andrew Brons would have been amazing on Question Time
Reply
1
0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
The book being discussed this evening can be found here:
https://www.claymorebooks.co.uk/shop/
Reply
1
0

@KennySmith
8 hours ago

@BeerHallPooch
Indeed, I am a big collector of nationalist books and I have started telling folk I’d be happy to take anything they don’t want or would like preserved for posterity. I’ll open a reference library when we win the struggle.
Reply
1
0

@KennySmith
9 hours ago
Hi Folks, you can get the books here:

Hammer of the Patriot

Reply
1
0

@BeerHallPooch
9 hours ago
The book being discussed this evening can be found here:
https://www.claymorebooks.co.uk/shop/
Reply
1
0

@BeerHallPooch
9 hours ago
The book being discussed this evening can be found here:
https://www.claymorebooks.co.uk/shop/
Reply
1
0

@Nobody
3 hours ago
I like Kenny’s accent but what they’re saying about Pakistani is unacceptable. See? They think the Pakistani are amazing! I have to leave. I can’t stand this.
Reply

1
Show reply

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
Morgoth on Wed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
0
1

@Kelema90
3 hours ago
People are taking far too much time to wake up. This show should be broadcast worldwide in all English speaking countries.
Reply

0

@TheEuropeanSpear
4 hours ago
This book together with Go Free and you’ll never lose an argument ever again.
Reply

0

@Horatius
7 hours ago
thanks guys! awesome stream!!
Reply

0

@Horatius
7 hours ago
check out counter currents if looking for a stream to listen to now
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago
Thanks folks. Have a great night.
Reply

0

@Dewitt
7 hours ago
Great show o/
Reply

0

@BritishGammon
7 hours ago
night all. Great show. 14
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
ace
Reply

0

@PureNomad
7 hours ago
14
Reply

0

@Sons_of_Odin
7 hours ago
cya all Wednesday, take care all x
Reply

0

@ChainReaction
7 hours ago
Hᴇɪʟ Bʀᴏᴛʜᴇʀs ᴀɴᴅ Sɪsᴛᴇʀs \ᴏ \ᴏ \ᴏ
Reply

0

@KennySmith
7 hours ago

@Miss_Right
Yes we do, though somebody said it was not working tonight. Email sales@claymorebooks.co.uk and we can sort it for you.
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
14
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
7 at one blow.
Reply

0

@Horatius
7 hours ago
I like when Mark debated 6 at once and destroyed them all
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
If in doubt, listen to Uncle mark who listened to Uncle A
Reply

0

@Dewitt
7 hours ago
You’ve got me talked into but I’m on a different island
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
I go turbo on my family cos I can get away with it
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago

@KennySmith
Do you ship outside the UK ?
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
No brother wars.
Reply

0

@Dewitt
7 hours ago
No shipping outside of UK?
Reply

0

@JohanFredrickson1290
7 hours ago
NO Brother wars
Reply

0

@MEAN_PEEM
7 hours ago
great book, great stream
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
Hard to believe Mark and Kenny were once daggers drawn. DO NOT let grudges overwhem you, people
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago

@ReedJohnson
They don’t seem to ship outside the UK ???
Reply

0

@Outtolive
7 hours ago
audio books are great. Hope it goes to audio books
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago

@Stonewall-brigade
my pleasure
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago

@Stonewall-brigade
^^
Reply

0

@Stonewall-brigade
7 hours ago
thanks
Reply

0

@Stonewall-brigade
7 hours ago
post link to book??
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago
not just win the public discourse, but dominate
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
14 all. Great stream
Reply

0

@Horatius
7 hours ago
our side needed a book like this
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago

@Sons_of_Odin
Sometimes that’s a good enough reason alone
Reply

0

@JohanFredrickson1290
7 hours ago
Thanks Pooch , great stream, thanks all. 14
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
Hail teh Cause
Reply

0

@Horatius
7 hours ago
every major Court decision over the last 80 years has been total b s. Brown vs Board of Education as just one example
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
Bloody good show. Nationalist principles came to the fore
Reply

0

@KennySmith
7 hours ago

@BeerHallPooch
Thank you
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
Good notes make a good stream! Thanks, Aunt Sally!
Reply

0

@Horatius
7 hours ago
been
Reply

0

@Horatius
7 hours ago
they were made to finally work and they will never forgive for having be made to do so
Reply

0

@simmons6319.2
7 hours ago
yeah I enjoy a hard day’s work.
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
The gay marriage decision is one that was poorly argued and wrongly decided, constitutionally, in the ‘States, and it may be overruled by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Reply

0

@14Ways
7 hours ago
Work sets you free
Reply

0

@simmons6319.2
7 hours ago
they’re greedy pathetic parasites that would rather scheme than work one day.
Reply

0

@Sons_of_Odin
7 hours ago
or – did you know DNA tests now prove most modern Jews are not Semitic –
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/leaked-report-israel-acknowledges-jews-in-fact-khazars-secret-plan-for-reverse-migration-to-ukraine/
Reply

0

@PureNomad
7 hours ago
\o night all, thx for the show
Reply

0

@ChainReaction
7 hours ago
oh corporations love saudi arabia
Reply

0

@Horatius
7 hours ago
we are the normal ones. they are the evil genocidal freaks and bastards
Reply

0

@Horatius
7 hours ago
not racist just normal like you great grandfathers were. most people on our side just support what was normal 80 years ago
Reply

0

@Sons_of_Odin
7 hours ago
^
Reply

0

@Archie.Bunker
7 hours ago
I am a racist but the good kind
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
talent == successfully applied for benefit
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
^^^^^^^^^^^
Reply

0

@Horatius
7 hours ago
I’ve heard Greg Johnson is a homosexual and he does great work for the cause at counter currents but he is an exception
Reply

0

@ChainReaction
7 hours ago
‘racist’ is the White man’s n-word
Reply

0

@JohanFredrickson1290
7 hours ago
tolerance = submission
Reply

0

@Dewitt
7 hours ago
They won’t hesitate to turn on you when the heat is on them
Reply

0

@Outtolive
7 hours ago
Bible quotes that a fool is one who thinks he is good when he is really evil. Know your place get the best results
Reply

0

@Dewitt
7 hours ago
Gays are naturally submissive, the type of ally with no honor
Reply

0

@JohanFredrickson1290
7 hours ago
Laura made me think of doolan lol
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
Hi Catherine!!!
Reply

0

@JohanFredrickson1290
7 hours ago
lol get back to china bitch pmsfl
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
7 hours ago
I submit that some influential figure turning up at a PA event with his non-white fiancee is the same as a gay turning up dressed as in pride parade leathers and oversized codpiece.
Reply

0

@Sons_of_Odin
7 hours ago
Did laura say Ramstein ?
Reply

0

@Dewitt
7 hours ago
I still won’t beg with my back against the wall.
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
It might be a smaller movement if we only admitted the perfect
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago

@14Ways
Call it what you want: our backs are against the wall
Reply

0

@PureNomad
7 hours ago
lol
Reply

0

@14Ways
7 hours ago
We are not beggars.
Reply

0

@Outtolive
7 hours ago
Pride is illegal
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago
^^^^
Reply

0

@Outtolive
7 hours ago
beggar is the correct word for our situation.
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago
utter perfection and purity spiraling are counter-productive
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
army*
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
One works with the amry he has, not with the army he wishes he had
Reply

0

@Dewitt
7 hours ago
do…..do we have a lot of gays who aren’t completely indoctrinated in leftist ideology who actually want to help us? is this a thing?
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago
Mark is correct; beggars can’t be chosers
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
SPOT ON, Mark
Reply

0

@Dewitt
7 hours ago
Pink Triangles will work too
Reply

0

@BB
7 hours ago
as long as they wear bells so we know where they are
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
14
Reply

0

@Outtolive
7 hours ago
always learn something from the show. Merits. UH Respect and courage.
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
7 hours ago
Very witty, Miss
Reply

0

@TheThinRedLine
7 hours ago
well said
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
Y. M. PA, Y. M. PA
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
Mark is spot on here. Gay or not, both this person and Martin Webster have a done a hell of a lot for the Cause. That can’t be denied.
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago
Counter-Currents article on the value of creating new patronage and philanthropy networks:
https://tinyurl.com/bddkbxdk
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
The Spoons Hall Putsch in Kendal was serious uplifting
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
What if they were actually construction workers?
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
7 hours ago
LOL.
Reply

0

@deadeye30o6
7 hours ago
gun owners of america
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
3
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago

@Miss_Right
Poochs change things
Reply

0

@deadeye30o6
7 hours ago
now every one is going with GOA
Reply

0

@BB
7 hours ago
^
Reply

0

@deadeye30o6
7 hours ago
NRA sold out years ago
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
^^ advocating a Pooch, are we?
Reply

0

@KennySmith
7 hours ago

@Nobody
I’m not sure you understood what I said about these immigrants!
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
CORRECT. Unionise with them. MASS STRIKES needed. Attack the System
Reply

0

@Dewitt
7 hours ago
Community means everyone living according to the same rules as much as it does values. Other cultures don’t give a fuck about our rules or values.
Reply

0

@BritishGammon
7 hours ago

@Carlota
The UK gov lied and said it was only 5 million!
Reply

0

@Sons_of_Odin
7 hours ago
nps buddy
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago

@Sons_of_Odin
Thanks for that. Very interesting. Cheers
Reply

0

@Outtolive
7 hours ago
Get under handed if you have too. survival is the name of the game. Acting British and selfish makes liberial so mad love it
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago
once you reduce people to the level of beasts, they’ll be capable of just about anything
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
It takes some intelligence, maturity, and courage to be nationalist. It was not my starting point, not being the sharpest knife in the drawer: I carried a “Little Red Book” when I was a pre-teen – Mao’s stuff was popular on the left in the ‘States during the Vietnam war.
Reply

0

@Sons_of_Odin
7 hours ago
1.3 million immigrants left the UK during lockdown – economic collapse will encourage even more to leave. The WEF will help us greatly –
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/covid-uk-immigrants-job-loss-b1787785.html
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago

@Horatius
*a full-spectrum genocidal campaign
Reply

0

@BritishGammon
7 hours ago

@Carlota
Yes. According to the Daily Expose

UK Gov. report admits 19.2 million people in England have not had a single dose of a Covid-19 Vaccine, and another 12 million have refused a 2nd or 3rd Dose

Reply

0

@Horatius
7 hours ago
whites are forced by threat of prison if they don’t subsidize non white children with their tax dollars. if they got to keep that money, they would have money to have their own or more than they have. this is a genocidal campaign
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
Folk will soon be in need of charity (toys, clothes, etc) this Christmas. We could start prepping for this by collecting / centralising this goods

@MarkCollett

@KennySmith
Reply

0

@Outtolive
7 hours ago
Quit feeling guilty. good point
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
Which is why when people make fun of ‘they made the trains run on time’ they are completely missing the point.
Reply

0

@Outtolive
7 hours ago
tell them to get out of UK Do not give them preverbally food from your tables
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
7 hours ago
welocme

@Nobody
stay cool old chap, we will prevail!
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
PAIN and SUFFERING is needed to change the nomie. I do not welcome it, but it’s a necessity
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago

@Miss_Right
either way, the most important question regarding the repeal of Roe v. Wade is: “Is it good for whites?”
Reply

0

@Horatius
7 hours ago
whites think of someone is friendly to them, then they are a good person when in actuality they don’t know them and non whites know how naive and gullible whites are when it comes to them
Reply

0

@Outtolive
7 hours ago
women have enough children for replacement in USA. Immigration policy cares to much for the fourth world. 75 percent of USA would be white in 1965 immigration act was not enacted. Mass non european immigration caused it
Reply

0

@Dewitt
7 hours ago
all the legal “experts” on the left are just straight commies. fuck their arguments
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
My story is similar to Kenny’s. Supporting the underdog, NF, etc
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
Repealing Roe was actually wanted by Constitutional lawyers on “both sides of the aisle” since it was badly argued and improperly decided. There are three other cases that the left is up in arms about but that were also badly decided that should go with support by legal experts on both sides.
Reply

0

@Nobody
7 hours ago
I come here to clear my head after being targeted by middle easterners and blacks to have a fucking guy talking about how Pakistani people are great in Wales where they shouldnt exist? Fuck off!
Reply

0

@PureNomad
7 hours ago
screwdriver rocked
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago
As long as people have food in their belly, a job to go to, money in their pockets, and are able to walk safe streets; they generally will not act
Reply

0

@Carlota
7 hours ago

@BritishGammon
19 million? Really?
Reply

0

@BB
7 hours ago
would you really want an influx of supporters only joining in reaction to single event or a trickle of supporters that have experienced mulitple events
Reply

0

@Sons_of_Odin
7 hours ago
The Great Reset will push many people into politics and it will also make many immigrants pack their bags and go home by their own accord.
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
Spot on, kenny
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago
^^^
Reply

0

@BritishGammon
7 hours ago
19 million people in England didn’t get a single jab-that has to be encouraging.
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago
it’s about being in the right position and ready to go, once circumstances and factors turn in our direction
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago

@BeerHallPooch
sadly
Reply

0

@KennySmith
7 hours ago

@Sons_of_Odin
Thank you. I’m sure you will enjoy it.
Reply

0

@Sons_of_Odin
7 hours ago
just ordered the book.
Reply

0

@PrevailingWest
7 hours ago
looks interesting
Reply

0

@Dewitt
7 hours ago
Imagine not fucking without regard to the life you create
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago
^^^^^
Reply

0

@Horatius
7 hours ago
the left will create whole networks to bring women from states where abortion is banned to states where it isn’t. they have billions of dollars to make the network. unless anti abortion states outlaw the trafficking
Reply

0

@Outtolive
7 hours ago
Modern Politics quoted that immigration policy was the problem 2million people were born in USA. 4 million people migrated there. guilt tripping to accept replacing our young with migrants,
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
7 hours ago
How are violent young males on benefit going to benefit the economy? SMH
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago

@Sons_of_Odin
Repealing Roe v. Wade checks a number of boxes: 1.) your point 2.) it will produce more hostile blacks to attack whites and 3.) it will reanimate the Left.
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
Projection
Reply

0

@Dewitt
7 hours ago
every other race breeds out of control without any regard to carrying capacity
Reply

0

@Nobody
7 hours ago
Abortion hit blacks way more than Whites. I do not support abortion of Whites. Then you have Whites praising a black justice for now forcing more blacks being born.
Reply

0

@KennySmith
7 hours ago

@BB
Greetin Thumbsberg lol! I’ll be re-using that.
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Reply

0

@ChainReaction
7 hours ago
pity streams like this don’t have a 144p vide quality option
Reply

0

@Sons_of_Odin
7 hours ago
They banned abortion in the USA for the explicit reason that the abortion statistics are going to plummet due to how many women can no longer get pregnant anymore after the covid vaccine and they don’t want people asking questions.
So to cover it they banned abortion, it’s as simple as that.
Reply

0

@Archie.Bunker
7 hours ago

@Nobody
The problem isn’t just the Zios that cry “antisemitism” if truth is spoken to their power. The other problem is the political correctness by all other alien cultures
Reply

0

@Horatius
7 hours ago
I can’t see your name but I was the same way. No idea really why I could see through it all since I was a kid. I think it might be a mix of certain personality traits. The book American Extremist is said to discuss the subject of why we are different
Reply

0

@KennySmith
7 hours ago

@BritishGammon
Thank you. Sub to this man’s channel folks.
Reply

0

@Nobody
7 hours ago
I am being targeted by blacks and an Iranian and do you think there’s a White group that I can get support from in Europe? No. There’s no unity. You can only believe in so much BS before waking up.
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
7 hours ago

@Carlota
yeah, there’s definitely something wrong with Greta
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
Roes be mad LOL
Reply

0

@Archie.Bunker
7 hours ago
Re: “Politicians that have the …” I am referring to Boris Johnson and Priti Patel. They don’t put their money where their mouth is.
Reply

0

@Nobody
7 hours ago
The thing is we are in this situation because of corrupt Whites that let the Jews in and now because of the brainwashed ones that hate their own people and love other races.
Reply

0

@Nobody
7 hours ago

@Horatius
I know I can’t compare other to me, I was reading Mein Kampf when I was a kid, I never felt sorry for the holocaust even when I thought it was real as a kid, but people in general are stupid, no matter the race. I’m White so I want Europe to be 100%
Reply

0

@Archie.Bunker
7 hours ago
Politicians that have the strongest principle are “populists.” All others lie to pander to the largest mass in order to hold power and push their ideology.
Reply

0

@Duncan_Onzog
7 hours ago

@Horatius
yep
Reply

0

@Nobody
7 hours ago
If you want to see all the pajeets in the British parliament, here’s my cartoon celebrating the Queen’s Kwanzaa
https://gab.com/nooneisperfect/posts/108192696141444517
Reply

0

@ChainReaction
7 hours ago
nice

@Archie.Bunker
Reply

0

@Horatius
7 hours ago
whites are not stupid. they are living under terrorism perpetrated by a psychotic genocidal cult. maybe propagandized to be gullible and naive and trust the hierarchy way too much
Reply

0

@Nobody
7 hours ago
If you want to see all the pajeets in the British parliament, here’s my cartoon celebrating the Queen’s Kwanzaa
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
7 hours ago
“Everything I do is for the love of my own, not for the hatred of others”
Reply

0

@deadeye30o6
7 hours ago
and bring the ones with blood on there hands to trial and make sure there is a RECORD of there crimes
Reply

0

@Archie.Bunker
7 hours ago
The New American has a video of Daniel Natal titled “Bargaining With A Chimp” that’s about how progressives pull conservatives towards social degeneration.
https://thenewamerican.com/bargaining-with-a-chimp/
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
it’s not just scolding it’s psychological warfare and abuse
Reply

0

@Nobody
8 hours ago
She looks like she has down syndrome, with those asiatic eyes of hers
Reply

0

@Dewitt
8 hours ago
just 6 more years goyim
Reply

0

@Sons_of_Odin
8 hours ago
she has autism not down syndrome lol
Reply

0

@Nobody
8 hours ago
White people are just stupid and their relative nobility (compared to other races) is their own downfall. At one point you stop feeling sorry for imbeciles.
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
8 hours ago
The hand-rubbers have their ecology too: They are parasites who cannot live without us.
Reply

0

@Horatius
8 hours ago
evolved past animalistic traits? no but whites built civilizations which pushed down those traits and ostracized those who gave into the 7 deadly sins and other hedonism and debauchery
Reply

0

@BritishGammon
8 hours ago
If the UK is “over populated” why then did the Tories import 1 million foreigners last year?
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
hypocrisy is their stock and trade!
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
“starving kids in Ethiopia” I never heard the end of that one
Reply

0

@Sons_of_Odin
8 hours ago
my mate is having his 7th child this year
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
8 hours ago
We wear clothes and build houses.
Reply

0

@LauraTowler
8 hours ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
8 hours ago
Humans have their ecology, which is their extended phenotype.
Reply

0

@Nobody
8 hours ago

@Horatius
you think people have evolved from their animalistic traits? Only a few Whites throughout the ages have, maybe some Japanese.
Reply

0

@deadeye30o6
8 hours ago
the problem is people in the west just tolerate these scamers to much just kick them out
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
just because something happens, doesn’t make it right
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
The book being discussed this evening can be found here:
https://www.claymorebooks.co.uk/shop/
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago

@KennySmith
haha, indeed
Reply

0

@Horatius
8 hours ago
because they want people to revert back to being just animals as part of their humiliation ritual
Reply

0

@Nobody
8 hours ago
Animals do things in tune with nature. Animals > Human animals
Reply

0

@Ancientworld
8 hours ago
Sgt Pepper
Reply

0

@Ancientworld
8 hours ago
on the Beatles album
Reply

0

@ChainReaction
8 hours ago
I’m a centrist myself
https://preview.redd.it/yh42m1ir4in41.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=5f3832928ae44a644e6382537f16106ff8ac2ddb
Reply

0

@0KT0BER
8 hours ago
theyve been renovating/rebuilding Boleskine, Crowleys house on the quiet
Reply

0

@KennySmith
8 hours ago

@ReedJohnson
But how white will it get your whites?
Reply

0

@deadeye30o6
8 hours ago
thats because the jew is always scamming every one even legitimate clams if they can, they’ll will milk every one what there woth regardless
Reply

0

@Nobody
8 hours ago
Have you heard of the news about that Ethan Melzer guy? I haven’t had the opportunity yet to read it, no sources seemed to be very reliable.
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago

@KennySmith
Glad we agree
Reply

0

@Sons_of_Odin
8 hours ago
i spent 15 hours a day for 2 months solid debunking the holocaust. It was the good days back before the mass banning of information.
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
8 hours ago
Libtards will move the goal posts as follows: If you document the evidence that there were no homicidal gas chambers then the reply will be “well, the nazis certainly committed atrocities.”
Reply

0

@Dewitt
8 hours ago
I know I know
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago

@Dewitt
jewish lives matter more than yours
Reply

0

@ChainReaction
8 hours ago
always amused me – yanks bomb supplie lines – then wonder abt starving inmates – wtf…
Reply

0

@Horatius
8 hours ago
the films show prisoners that were starving because the rail lines and infrastructure were bombed and food could go no longer get there. why would they allow them to live?? lol. you have no answer to that. the guards could of just shot them and split
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago

@Natty
correction: a washing machine connected to the internet that spies on you
Reply

0

@ChainReaction
8 hours ago
60 – 120 milion Christian Whites exterminated by jew communism
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
I’m not supporting Barnes, merely saying it was a good idea. Brons looks like a cuddly uncle and and is well spoken and knows more of the Cause. It would have been much better

@KennySmith
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
8 hours ago
It’s a made-up figure and the burden of proof is on those claiming such a number.
Reply

0

@Dewitt
8 hours ago
Forget about that Holodomor stuff the (((commies))) committed goyim, only the Jews deaths matter
Reply

0

@ChainReaction
8 hours ago
in the East during peak war a few hungarian jews might have been executed due to threat n terrorism – all countries have done far worse
Reply

0

@schintzellove
8 hours ago
Thanks sons of odin
Reply

0

@Nobody
8 hours ago
Natty saw the meme from yesterday, of the woman that supports abortion lying on the couch with wine, cats, crying.
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
wine aunty!
Reply

0

@Dewitt
8 hours ago
and 24 million have been saved
Reply

0

@regnark
8 hours ago
That’s why 12 millions get reparations.
Reply

0

@deadeye30o6
8 hours ago
sorry they have films of the camps of prisoners in them when they free them
Reply

0

@Sons_of_Odin
8 hours ago
that link is a keeper
Reply

0

@Sons_of_Odin
8 hours ago
PDF of the official redcross investigation into total deaths in the camps
https://archive.org/details/ReportOfTheInternationalCommitteeOfTheRedCrossOnItsActivitiesDuring/ReportOfTheInternationalCommitteeOfTheRedCrossOnItsActivitiesDuringTheSecondWorldWarseptember11939-June301947Vol.2/
Reply

0

@KennySmith
8 hours ago

@BeerHallPooch
Barnes the unqualified legal eagle lol! Even broken clocks are correct twice a day. One Lamp’s yes men buttered him up and he was not ready for it. He was no longer used to combating the dissenting voice.
Reply

0

@deadeye30o6
8 hours ago
dude they have file of the camps of prisoners in them when they free them
Reply

0

@Dewitt
8 hours ago
only 6 million out of 6 million survived the holohoax
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
laughter is deadly
Reply

0

@ChainReaction
8 hours ago
plenty of proof that it couldn’t have happened, even the number on the plaque kept changing, which is why it was made illegal to question
Reply

0

@Dewitt
8 hours ago
HEY NICK FUENTES BELIEBERS IN THE HUWHITE RACE
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
know your audience and your target demographic
Reply

0

@Horatius
8 hours ago

@dead
there are no records and they have no proof. look into it because you’ve been lied to
Reply

0

@Nobody
8 hours ago
Guys are there groups where we can get vetted to do normal activities and befriend people in our sphere in Southern Europe?
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
the tide of laughter has turned at that point
Reply

0

@PureNomad
8 hours ago
damn wish I’d have caught the start
Reply

0

@deadeye30o6
8 hours ago
so you really can’t say it didn’t happen
Reply

0

@Horatius
8 hours ago
records of what?
Reply

0

@Horatius
8 hours ago
blackpilled talked about how all the movie industry heads went to the concentration camps in 45 and came back to the U S and didn’t mention a Holocaust or anything at all
Reply

0

@Nobody
8 hours ago
They say because it’s so “bad” that if you question it, you’re evil and there’s room for “misinformation”.
Reply

0

@deadeye30o6
8 hours ago
well they do got records of it though
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
I’ll keep saying it: Lee Barnes was right is proposing pulling Griffo at the last minute and sending Brons instead.

@KennySmith
Reply

0

@JohanFredrickson1290
8 hours ago
wheres the reciepts
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago

@Horatius
as useless as tits on a bull
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
8 hours ago
Mark snapping a Roman?
Reply

0

@ChainReaction
8 hours ago
oh give me that chance just once…
Reply

0

@Horatius
8 hours ago
debating a libshit is like trying to nail jello to a wall
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
Ok if we’re going down that route, Uncle A
Reply

0

@Nobody
8 hours ago
Good evening. Trying to stay cool while being targeted by blacks and an Iranian in Europe. I wish I had friends in our sphere but I live in a melting pot in Europe.
Reply

0

@Sons_of_Odin
8 hours ago
mosley, my fave as well
Reply

0

@JohanFredrickson1290
8 hours ago
^^^
Reply

0

@BB
8 hours ago
mosley
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
Apart from Bowden, who’s the best Nat speaker???? Arthur Kemp for me
Reply

0

@Horatius
8 hours ago
global warming hoax has exposed the science industry, paid for by government, as completely corrupt and converged
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
brutality and savagery is a virtue in debating. Or rather, there’s debating, and then there’s intellectual combat
Reply

0

@BritishGammon
8 hours ago

@Hobbit-Habit
What do you mean by “green”?
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
8 hours ago
Physical anthropology was killed by (((Boaz))).
Reply

0

@Dewitt
8 hours ago
even when it does they discard it because you quoted it
Reply

0

@LauraTowler
8 hours ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
8 hours ago
They will deconstruct “greenness.”
Reply

0

@deadeye30o6
8 hours ago
whats wrong goy you don’t like my arguments
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago

@Carlota
you know that
Reply

0

@Dewitt
8 hours ago
gotta have the (((peers))) check it out for “truth”
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
8 hours ago

@Hobbit-Habit
Yes, I have the .PDF, I’d like a printed copy – maybe I can get it printed in a “Pocket Constitution” format
Reply

0

@Horatius
8 hours ago

@Bill
you can’t like on your phone until the video is uploaded after
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
Iron fist in velvet glove. Laura is bad ass
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
the public wants to be entertained as they’re influenced
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago

@Hobbit-Habit
Haha, nice. I like raptors
Reply

0

@LauraTowler
8 hours ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
8 hours ago
It’s a literary velociraptor’s sickle claw.
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
yeah, combo phrases and strategically placed insults are fun too. Mark’s good at that
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
8 hours ago
97 currently watching on Odysee 47 likes, come on folks….
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
#Basedkenny
Reply

0

@deadeye30o6
8 hours ago
oy vey
Reply

0

@Horatius
8 hours ago
propaganda articles and propaganda studies are created on purpose to be used by activists later
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
Dr Shlomo Chickenswinger says….
Reply

0

@PureNomad
8 hours ago
cool nattys back on the book review show
Reply

0

@Nordic_Warrior14
8 hours ago
Lol
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
hahaha
Reply

0

@Horatius
8 hours ago
meet rhetoric with rhetoric. dialectic with dialectic. also most people are rhetorical thinkers so rhetoric will work much better on them. speaking dialectally to them is like speakinga foreign language. pointless
Reply

0

@Carlota
8 hours ago
Trump owned hostile interviewers by making the audience laugh without even having to address the questions
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
Soy Squared!
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago

@MarkCollett
100%. Laughter is deadly, highly-effective, and totally underrated. Make them laugh and they will love you and your message.
Reply

0

@sparkofspirit
8 hours ago
spiteful mutants
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
8 hours ago

@Miss_Right
You can find the pdf on the “wayback machine.”
Reply

0

@Sons_of_Odin
8 hours ago
I like the sound of this book, i think I will buy it
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
Perhaps some light facts and figures where effective, but yeah, the public doesn’t really care about “muh facts”. They do however, love wit
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
humiliating a bad faith opponent is always a crowd pleaser. The crowd loves it
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
Tollah’s a cheeky monkey
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
8 hours ago

@KennySmith
Do you ship to the U.S. ?
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
haha, that’s a pretty funny rebuttal
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
“racist!” I just laugh and say, “spare me you meaningless cliches -they have no power with me”
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
human rights don’t apply to whites, by their standard anyway
Reply

0

@KennySmith
8 hours ago

@Miss_Right
Only via the website for now.
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
LOL. No wonder I was lost
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
8 hours ago
lol you wrote ty (I guess for ta), ty is the Welsh word for house
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
You’ve lost me, mate???????

@BillAtheling
Reply

0

@JohanFredrickson1290
8 hours ago
Evening all
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
haha, what (((group))) was helping to fund colonialism? As usual, no legs to stand on
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
8 hours ago
Libtards are knuckle-dragging halfwits.
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
8 hours ago
ty … house

@BeerHallPooch
?
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
8 hours ago
Claymore doesn’t (yet?) ship to the ‘States.
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
the public appreciates dominance with style and panache
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
ty
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
8 hours ago
WALES
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
Excellent. Puts my mind at rest.

@BillAtheling
What region are you (if you can say here)?
Reply

0

@ChainReaction
8 hours ago
TA ^
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
8 hours ago
Where is it available in the ‘States?
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
8 hours ago
Mike Lynch

@ChainReaction
Reply

0

@ChainReaction
8 hours ago
who was the guy that humiliated piers morgan?
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
8 hours ago

@BeerHallPooch
they will be, my lad’s in PA too and my kids are all ‘red pilled’
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
8 hours ago
PM Nick
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
“Failure to prepare, is preparing to fail”
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago

@BillAtheling
Futher to what me and Kenny were just saying, please ensure the books will be preserved within the Movement. I dread to think how many Nat books have ended in the bin after deaths
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago

@BeerHallPooch
Agreed. It’s not for everyone.
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago

@Hobbit-Habit
I like e-books too. You’d be surprised how much ground you can cover on your phone with life’s dead time (waiting in line, doctor’s office, etc.)
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
8 hours ago

@BeerHallPooch
yes, me too, lots of reference encyclopedias, etc. pre’woke’… surrounded by books here ready for the next generation….
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
8 hours ago

@BeerHallPooch
same here. paper is my friend
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
I struggle to read digital books. It’s just not the same
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
^^ out of the gate
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
8 hours ago

@ReedJohnson
agreed, Mark’s on point today
Reply

0

@KennySmith
8 hours ago

@BeerHallPooch
Good on both of you. I couldn’t agree more.
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
8 hours ago
I’m used to reading digital books.
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
8 hours ago
Laura said she likes to read Kai Murros speeches in chapters at her leisure.
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
“All killer, no filler” is a fantastic phrase
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
are*
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago
Nice one

@KennySmith
Glad to hear that. Myself and Fenek Solore have extensive libraries. We need to ensure they and suitably passed on
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago

@14Ways
If Mark comes off Red Bull now, he’ll likely die from the withdrawal
Reply

0

@14Ways
8 hours ago
Mark need to change his diet
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
8 hours ago
A Readers Digest condensed book.
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
many writers take too long getting to the point and being careless with the reader’s time
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago
^ good thinking
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
8 hours ago

@KennySmith
Bad loss. I keep banging on about folk ensuring their wills and book collections go to a good home within the Movement
Reply

0

@KennySmith
8 hours ago

@BeerHallPooch
Not sure what happened to his set up after he passed away.
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
8 hours ago

@Hobbit-Habit
Indeed
Reply

0

@LauraTowler
8 hours ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Reply

0

@Dewitt
8 hours ago
o/
Reply

0

@Rill
8 hours ago
dulcet tones
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
8 hours ago
Verbal ammunition.
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
9 hours ago
My kinda book.
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
9 hours ago

@ReedJohnson
Hear hear
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
9 hours ago
facts and truth are not always enough; rhetorical sparring skills, however, count
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
9 hours ago
short and sweet
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
9 hours ago
“educate them to stay in the struggle”, I like the sound of that
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
9 hours ago
What happened to Anthony Hancock’s printing op at Liss House, Hants?????????????????
Reply

0

@deadeye30o6
9 hours ago
like the slavs etc, etc
Reply

0

@deadeye30o6
9 hours ago
what about eastern europeans
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
9 hours ago
^ haha, yes indeed
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
9 hours ago
We have reality on our side.
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
9 hours ago
‘When we win – and we WILL win….”
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
9 hours ago
when we take power, the beans will be worth more
Reply

0

@Murderbaycasual
9 hours ago
14
Reply

0

@14Ways
9 hours ago
14
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
9 hours ago
Odysee is the Model T of video platforms.
Reply

0

@simmons6319.2
9 hours ago
1⃣4⃣
Reply

0

@deadeye30o6
9 hours ago
14 all the way
Reply

0

@Miss_Right
9 hours ago
14 everyone
Reply

0

@deadeye30o6
9 hours ago
hello
Reply

0

@ChainReaction
9 hours ago
looking forward to this
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
9 hours ago
lmao…
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
9 hours ago
What time does Spoons stop Sunday dinner????????? LOL
Reply

0

@Hobbit-Habit
9 hours ago
88, all!
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
9 hours ago
^ that sounds tasty
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
9 hours ago
Beef and mustard, baby carrots, that really dark cabbage, garden peas… kin starving now
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
9 hours ago

@BeerHallPooch
and roasties cooked in beef dripping mmm
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
9 hours ago
lol
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
9 hours ago
STOP, Bill! I’ve only had fishcakes and chips! LOL
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
9 hours ago

@BeerHallPooch

@LauraTowler
and of course home made gravy from the stock…
Reply

0

@ChainReaction
9 hours ago
don’t forget to BOOST the visibility of streams you like with your LBRY via SUPPORT button, it’s refundable so can keep reusing
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
9 hours ago

@BeerHallPooch
yes, we cook the beef overnight slowly…
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
9 hours ago
Yorks pud at least then. Beef is my fav
Reply

0

@LauraTowler
9 hours ago
Ooh sounds lush!
Reply

0

@ChainReaction
9 hours ago
Hᴇɪʟ Bʀᴏᴛʜᴇʀs ᴀɴᴅ Sɪsᴛᴇʀs \ᴏ \ᴏ \ᴏ
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
9 hours ago
Roast chicken, veg and Yorkshires
Reply

0

@BeerHallPooch
9 hours ago
Superchats, questions, comments.
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
9 hours ago
just finishing a late Sunday roast as I listen!
Reply

0

@LauraTowler
9 hours ago
Hey Bill
Reply

0

@BillAtheling
9 hours ago
evening folks, evening

@LauraTowler
Reply

0

@LauraTowler
9 hours ago
Good evening
Reply

0

@Rill
9 hours ago
evening
Reply

0

@DairyMilkDisciple
9 hours ago
very interested in this one. had the opportunity to talk about the GT red squirrel pin and what it means to some normie veterans recently and really wasn’t able to get the message across
Reply

0

@ReedJohnson
9 hours ago
Good evening patriots
Reply
0
0

 

 

============================================

 

 

xx UNFINISHED TRANSCRIPTS — Volunteers Needed

 

============================================

 

See Also

top

 

Mark Collett – The Queen Doesn’t give a SH*T About You – Jan 7, 2022 — Transcript

 

 

History Debunked – Is Multiculturalism Predominantly a Jewish Enterprise? – Feb 21, 2022 – Transcript