Monika Schaefer: Greetings. Good day. Good afternoon. Hello, wherever you are. Today’s date is August, 24, 2024. This is episode nine of The Flip Side with Monika. And I am your host, Monika Schaefer. Before I introduce today’s guest, I’ll give you the phone numbers to call after the bottom of the hour. We like to invite guests or callers to call in. And those numbers are 512-248-8252 or 1800 313 9443.

 

Okay, today’s guest is Grace Eki Oyama. And I’ll just give you a brief, a story of how I met Grace Eki. And this was back in 2015. So nine years ago almost. I attended the trial, the speech crime trial of Arthur Topham in Quesnel, British Columbia, Canada. And there I met some very interesting people.

 

And one of the people I met was Grace Eki Oyama. And it turns out she had attended other such trials and was very, very knowledgeable in many things.

 

And at that time we were talking about World War Two history, those kinds of things. The kind, the very subject that I got into some trouble with the powers that should not be, the Holocaust subject and all those things. So Grace Eki Oyama has been in this for a long time.

 

And today we’re going to talk about some other subjects a little bit different from that. But I’ll just, before I bring her on, I will just say that in my Chatango site, this is the chat room. And how you can find that chat room, it’s all spelled out The Flipside W Monika. So instead of with. It’s just a W.

 

So the Flipside W Monika Chatango. That’s Chatango. Chatango. Chatango.com. And I posted a video. It’s a five minute short video. It’s called The World Owes Germany an Apology for World War Two. And that’s a video of Grace Eki, who made this very brilliant and succinct little five minute talk, which was this apology.

 

And so I’ll let her talk a little bit about that too, because we were just revisiting that a few minutes ago. But the subject we’re going to talk about today are about musical frequency. And people have probably heard about 440 being the standard tuning for A and many people these days are aware that perhaps 432 might be a better frequency. So that’s one of our subjects.

 

And the other subject, and I had put this into the show notes, if you’re going to find this in the archives, is on the three stages. This is a Japanese philosophy about the three stages of development, childhood development. And I will let her just discuss that at length. So, Grace Eki, are you there?

 

Grace: Yes. Hello, Monika.

 

Monika Schaefer: Welcome.

 

Grace: Thank you.

 

Monika Schaefer: Would you like to start about this, the title of that video? Because we just talked about that a few minutes ago.

 

Grace: Yes. Because often it’s not me who put the title, but what I wanted to say. And if you. The idea was war is war. And then I feel that the world does owe an apology for what happened to the Germans, actually, after the war, how they were treated, and also the fact that there is no real official peace treaty, and the expellees, et cetera, et cetera. I think that’s very important for people to know and understand, because it leads away for the problem in what’s happening now in Palestine. There is a similarity, but the fact that it is not known at all, it’s a shame, because it’s things that, oh, including the Nuremberg, which was not a real trial, nor was it very fair.

 

And so that was the part that I wanted people to be at least conscious of.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, thank you for that. Just clarifying that that wasn’t, you know, our main subject today. But it does give the audience, the listener, a little bit of background about first of all, I explained how I met you was at this speech crime trial. And why don’t you give a little bit of a snapshot about background of yourself? I know you’ve done many things. You’ve lived in many places. You’ve been a writer, you’ve been a translator.

 

Can you just give maybe a couple of minutes, a bit of background of yourself?

 

Grace: Well, a couple of minutes.

 

Monika Schaefer: Maybe that’s not possible! [chuckling]

 

Grace: Once we get into the detail, we can go all over. But maybe, just as an honor to my father, I just want to add the fact that my father participated in World War Two. And the fact that he is a martial artist of karate.

 

So I wanted to say that you are brought up in a different environment than if my father was a banker, or a businessman, or a Professor, let’s say. And that was one thing.

 

And then later on, I worked with this researcher, a Japanese researcher who would also make history on his own. But his name is Ryu Ota. And Ota is the one who got me very much interested in, … Well, what really happened was when Eustace Mullins came to Japan, there was a presentation with a professional translator. And the translator, I realized, wasn’t really translating, not accurately. And it was about 9/11. And whatever Mr Mullins was saying, basically, she was translating it the opposite. I almost thought she could be a saboteur. But later on, I understood this, that we, first of all, in Italian they say, “translator traitors”. “Traditore, traditore”. Because it can’t be helped because you can only translate something that you understand. So she wasn’t, I feel, purposely doing that. But from her standard of knowledge and common sense, the alternative so-called conspiratorial theory sounded so absurd, I think she just couldn’t digest it and kind of purified the translation.

 

[08:40]

 

Monika Schaefer: Wow! And when you say 9/11, you’re talking about 9/11, the events of September 11, 2001, right?

 

Grace: Correct?

 

Monika Schaefer: To clarify, yes. Oh, that’s very interesting.

 

Grace: Well, he said a lot of interesting things, but she was diluting it down.

 

But anyway, so what I did was I wrote out what Mr Mullins said and what the translator said, and how I would have translated what I feel he really said. And I showed it to Ota. And ever since then, he’s asked me to basically become his translator. And through him, I met really not just Eustace Mullins, but he had more than 13 books by John Coleman translated into Japanese. Now he’s famous for the Committee of Three Hundred. He also, I think, was the first to talk about Bohemian Club and Bilderberg. I was also his translator when David Icke came two times when Ota called David Ike to Japan, for example. And he would have called Webster Tarpley. But unfortunately, he became ill and died. And that was about 2009 anyway.

 

So that taught me very much. That’s how I found out a lot about true history in the West. Yeah, true history in the West.

 

Despite this slogan of “democracy and freedom”, there really wasn’t., … You know, one of the reason about Arthur Topham’s trial is like, do we really have free speech? And ever since I found out about Zundel.

 

Monika Schaefer: Ernst Zundel.

 

Grace: Yes. And when the court in Canada, when the court judged that “truth is no defense”, I was so shocked! Because, well, how else are you expected to defend yourself? Yes, I just found it so absurd!

 

And I think that is, at least in, as far as Canada is concerned, that was when things started to crack. That was like the beginning of the cracking of the justice system.

 

And the other thing is that I really, honestly believe in freedom of speech. Even for your enemies, even for things that you don’t like. Because that’s the only way. I don’t want to sound like cliche, but the only way to peace is through negotiation and through diplomacy and so forth. And it saddens me also to see what is happening with Ukraine and Russia, too.

 

But instead of diplomacy or negotiation, basically a dialogue, it seems that the world has gone mad, and it’s like more money, more arms, more of the things that’s, more sanctions more of the things that’s really not a solution or working!

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. And I would say the really important element is deception. Right? In all these things that are happening.

 

Grace: Well, like, I think we would all agree that without deception, war is not possible, that war is propaganda!

 

Monika Schaefer: I’ve never heard anybody say it that way. That’s really, really good! That’s profound. I would say. [chuckling]

 

Grace: Thank you.

 

But I also think you have to demonize the enemy, because if you had one drop of sympathy, imagination, or compassion, you really could not have war.

 

So you have to demonize or as an “alien”, I say alien in quotation Mark because it can mean many things, but something so foreign and different and something to be demonized! And I’m sure you would understand.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

And, I mean, otherwise you wouldn’t have all these soldiers going and killing people who look like them, especially all these brother wars. Cousin wars.

 

Grace: Yeah.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. For sure. So, Grac Eki, that’s really very, very good! Thank you. I didn’t know how your beginnings were in translation, but that’s how you met all these people and then learned a lot about true history. And then I know that you were a writer for a while, I think, at the American Free Press.

 

Grace: No. Well, I had a job with them at the Barnes Review for a while, but it was very short. It was work, but that’s how I managed to go to Palestine in Israel.

 

So I am very appreciative of their help at that time.

 

Monika Schaefer: Right, right. Okay. Well, would you, do you feel ready to jump into the first of our subjects that we., … And the reason we’re going to talk about this, people might say:

 

“Well, why? This is kind of unrelated to anything else.”

 

But Gracie spent a few weeks with me a month or so ago, and we, of course, had time to talk about lots of things.

 

And I like to play music, and we talked about these frequencies. And generally, people, the standard tuning is for A is 440.

 

Now, anybody who plays and tunes up their instrument, they’ll know that.

 

Now, we talked about this other frequency, A 432. And I was just delighted and surprised to hear Grace Eki talk about this because you revealed to me that a lot about this.

 

And so I thought:

 

“Oh, well, we have to talk about this on the show.”

 

[chuckling] So tell us a little bit about how did that come to be that this frequency of 440 was pushed upon us. I think that’s what we had talked about when you were here.

 

Grace: But Monika, it’s not always 440. It can be 442. And I have heard of 446, so it isn’t always 440 either. It can even be higher.

 

Monika Schaefer: Well, I’ve heard that there are some orchestras that in Europe, for example, who are pushing to have the 442 tuning, and it’s just kind of tightening things up.

 

I feel like it’s tightening up a tight wire and to the bursting point or something. So go ahead and talk about the history, perhaps.

 

Grace: I would also say from 1980 to 85, I was in Italy actually studying music, you see, and around that time, there was also this revival of Baroque music and original instruments.

 

So I was always interested in this. But in order to save time, I will be a little bit practical.

 

I happen to be very, very fond of the Italian composer Verdi. This is also called La Verdiana, meaning Verdi’s A, meaning. He thought this was the best that it should be. This was the best pitch. So I assume that was the pitch he was writing in.

 

[16:13]

 

Monika Schaefer: Sorry, which was the best pitch?

 

Grace: Well, it depends how you count it. But basically 432.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Grace: If you want to really get into the science and all this is actually supposed to be like 430.8 or something, but because it depends how you count it from, the, C equals 256.

 

But in order to simplify, I also, later on, I knew, have you ever heard of Schiller Institute in Washington, DC?

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Grace: But anyway, there was a politician called Lyndon Larouche and his wife Helga, who is German. She heads the Schiller Institute. They only doer. Music and performances in a A equals 430 or 432. And from their Institute, if you Google, you can see musicians actually performing for you in two different pitch. I was lucky. I tried to look for some of the things that I managed to experience a long time ago, but not everything is on the Internet still, and I couldn’t find it.

 

So I’ll tell you one radio program with Carlo Bergonzi, but he was like the Italian star tenor. And in that radio program, he actually has three, like, graduate students in music singing opera arias in both pitches.

 

And all of them said that it feels so much natural to sing in 432 as opposed to 440. And Bergonzi would explain why he feels that is. I also, …

 

Monika Schaefer: Can you tell us a little bit about that? Why that is? Why does it feel better?

 

Grace: Well, first of all, I think you are getting, apparently the standard for classical music was about 430, 32, definitely until the fifties with Fruk Wengler [sp].

 

Now, you know, there are many people who like retro recordings. Could there be a possibility that the pitch does also influence? Is one.

 

And the other thing is that let’s try to get nearer to the composer’s original intent.

 

And the other thing is that without going into too much detail, we have chest and middle voice and high voice.

 

Now, if you, if the tuning is too high, your voice register changes at the wrong place, and that may not reflect correctly with the words that’s meant to be colored. Before you go and ask me, let me just add, I was also fortunate enough, … So there was a time when these musicians were actually doing presentation, like Norbert Brining. He was like the head of the Amadeus Quartet, and he actually played Bach Partita in two tones right in front of you, and you can feel the difference.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes.

 

Grace: Now, at the same time, I also want to tell you that there are people who like brilliant, who don’t like, who prefer the more brilliant tilling sounds.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Grace: And, but anyway, Verdi lost. Why? Apparently the Russian military equipments were already tuned higher and it, they can be more penetrating and they can be heard much better at distance. So for like, military bands in the 1800s.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Grace: That was their preferred pitch.

 

Monika Schaefer: I just want to, if I may jump in, for people who have not heard about this and they might think, well, why don’t you just play in a different key? That’s not actually what happens with this different tuning. It’s not just simply playing in a lower key. Like instead of C being C, go to B flat or something. That’s not what’s happening. This frequency is, I would say it’s less than a quarter tone or something. It’s really just a change in frequency. And it literally just is., … It’s something that we, … We all have a vibration. We all have a frequency. Everything around us is vibrating at a frequency. And the 432 frequency for the A is, to my knowledge, a more natural frequency that we simply, our bodies will vibrate more naturally to that.

 

So that’s the important point to make here. Otherwise people will say:

 

“Well, why don’t you just play lower, play in a lower key?”

 

[chuckling]

 

Grace: Just like when you change the tonality, the coloring of the piece changes. It’s a very subtle difference. But I would just say that for people interested, try looking for this kind of experiment that was done where they would switch the pitch, and you can also see what you, how you feel.

 

And as a last comment on this, I want to add that when I changed my piano tuning to 432, my daughter, who was in kindergarten, said:

 

“Much more relaxing!”

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Grace: That was the key for me.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes. So I did that once, Gracie Aki. I paid the piano tuner extra because it took longer, and I got him to tune my piano down to 432.

 

But then my next music jam, when I was asking all the musicians to tune their instruments down the guy with the twelve string guitar, [chuckling] and they didn’t appreciate it! [chuckling] So it didn’t work out. Well, that’s the problem. When we have this standard tuning that everybody’s tuned to and when we’re playing with people, we have to come to the agreement where we’re going to be tuned at. And what about accordions? I mean, all these instruments are tuned to that certain frequency.

 

So that’s a little bit of a, just a technical problem with this.

 

But it’s an interesting subject, and I do hope that maybe we’ll get some callers after the bottom of the hour on that subject.

 

I mean, I don’t want to be sounding like we’re jumping around one subject to another, but I think these things all kind of do relate back to us because it’s like we’re being, you know, damaged or assaulted on all fronts, and this is one of them. I do think that the musical frequencies is just another way that those who wish us harm are, you know, degrading us and this kind of thing. But unless you had something more that you wanted to talk about that.

 

[23:25]

 

Grace: Well, yeah, let me ask you, more for people can also try and find things, but 432 mathematically is two to the fourth power times three to the third power. And I have seen documentation how it corresponds with many other amphithegorian numbers.

 

But we don’t have time to really go into that. But I feel like, and before we go into that, let me, can I give you my favorite quote of Mozart, which is that he said:

 

“Music is painted on the canvas of silence.”

 

And that’s the other thing we are lacking. We don’t have enough silence!

 

And the other thing is that I think there is, music is used especially, … How can I explain this? Okay. Records used to, the sound would come in waves.

 

And I’m not so sure about the cassette, but I think it’s still rather relaxing compared to the CDs, all this digital sound, they actually come in square blocks exactly like in the computer screen. If you enlarge it’s made from little squares.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes. Pixels and pixels, right?

 

Grace: Correct. And it’s the same thing with music. You break it down into blocks and then you remake it, but it’s in blocks as opposed to waves. This is my personal comment, and I’m very much interested if anybody else ever felt the same, but I don’t listen so much to CDs anymore. It hurts my ear after a while.

 

Monika Schaefer: That’s so interesting. There’s a real resurgence in people buying records. Records, actual records, because it is a different quality of sound. It really is. And I’m sure that many people are nodding their heads as we’re speaking about this. For sure. For sure.

 

And that quote, because I just interrupted just when you were saying it was Mozart, did you say?

 

Grace: Yes. It’s hard to find the original, so I cannot guarantee.

 

But it’s supposed to be something he wrote in a letter.

 

Monika Schaefer: I think it’s very apt. We do need silence, and it’s Sorely lacking. [chuckling]

 

Grace: And [chuckling] the fact that it’s only beautiful because there’s the pause is one. And second. Mozart was like a kind of child prodigy that can say:

 

“Oh, the birds are Twittering in G major.”

 

For example, and I think he could hear natural sounds and decipher them better than many of us.

 

But I think that’s one of the reasons why his work is so eternal. And it seems to, … I’ve read research is how it increases the IQ of children.

 

Monika Schaefer: Oh, yes.

 

Actually, that’s a very good point. People say if you have Mozarte while you’re studying, you do better on your exams! [chuckling]

 

Grace: Interesting! No? And so but shall I, … Let’s move to the next.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, I just found this was the most interesting thing. And we’ll just have a couple of minutes before the bottom of the hour to touch on, but we’ll continue after the break. But you had talked to me about this Japanese. It’s a philosophy about the three stages of childhood. Go ahead.

 

Grace: It’s like a seven year cycle, but actually it corresponds very well to what Rudolph Steiner felt and thought, at least as far as education is concerned.

 

But this is the way I interpret. Well, in Japan, you are not adult until you are 20.

 

Monika Schaefer: Or 21? No? Because you said three times seven. The seven year cycle. Yes?

 

Grace: Well, although let’s say in the year that you will be 21, you are officially an adult. And it seems strange because if it’s just physical, you seem to have matured much earlier on. But apparently research has shown that human brain takes that long to genuinely finish maturing and growing, 20 years.

 

And the other thing I was trying to say is that, okay, for the first seven years, you’re just growing physically and you need a lot of physical activity. And then seven from 14, then you get your education in grammar and the basis. And then from, like, 14 till later, it’s, I think it corresponds to the classical concept of rhetoric. You know, grammar first, dialectic first, and then rhetorics. But it also, I don’t know exactly where and how I got this idea, but you’re physically, maybe even a 14, 15, you’re more or less done.

 

But as far as the concept of philosophy, physics, abstraction, spirituality, that kind of realm, you really don’t understand, you have to be at least 14, more or less. You know, we all have, like, I’m not talking about child prodigies or exceptional people. But usually it takes that long for you to really start to have that kind of capability to comprehend.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, it’s like the philosophical, the spiritual development, all of those things start after maturing.

 

We’ll come back after the break, Grace Eki, and you can discuss some of the factors that are stalling those processes. So please stick around and we’ll be back after the break.

 

[29:41]

[ad]

[36:00]

[music]

[36:58]

 

Monika Schaefer: All right, welcome back. That music is so beautiful! And it just makes me think of what you just told me about before World War Two, anyway, that it would have been commonplace for families in Europe and Germany to be playing chamber music together after supper, after dinner.

 

And can you imagine the enrichment that provided in their lives as opposed to being stuck in front of a screen.

 

But anyway, before we go on with our discussion, I’m just going to remind the listener, if you have the means, please, please do support the Republic broadcast broadcasting network.

 

And if you go to the website, there will be all the information there. There’s still the special on T-shirt that’s still going on right through September. A special T-shirt? I would say if you do, I think it’s a $100 donation.

 

And if you don’t have the means, there are other ways you can help this network, and that is by sharing these programs. And you can do that anyway, even if you are supporting financially or support the sponsors. Yeah. So this is not mainstream. We have such a we’re very fortunate to have the Republic Broadcasting Network so that we can speak freely and speak truth.

 

Okay. So we were going to get onto these three stages of development and this third stage, which is critically important, but it’s less visible to the eye because the physical growth has happened. And the learning, a lot of the learning is in school, like, you were talking about the grammar and this, that.

 

But this other thing that happens, it’s like philosophical spiritual development that comes in that third stage, does it not? And we had talked about, what are some of the things that could arrest that development? This is the critical part. Go ahead.

 

Grace: Well, like, I’ll put it bluntly. Sexualization! Over sexualization at a young age.

 

Now, the West is theoretically at least a Christian country.

 

And I think it’s somewhere in the Bible or the New Testament. Doesn’t it say something like:

 

“Children should not see wicked things.”

 

Or do you know?

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, no, I’m not familiar with, did you say a Bible verse?

 

Grace: But, anyway, innocence should be protected and childhood should be protected. It’s like you don’t offer a cigarette to a six year old.

 

Monika Schaefer: Right? No! And what are we seeing in the schools? I mean, this is a subject that we talk about often. I’ve talked about it before, the hyper sexualization, and it is shocking what is going on in the schools. And this is a direct attack on us, on our people, on our children. And my goodness, it’s beyond even just exposure. It’s like downright, you know, poisoning of the minds. And then even physical like:

 

“Oh, yeah, you don’t feel like a girl today. You want to take these hormone puberty blocking things and, oh, well, oh, well, just. Sure, we can cut off that penis!”

 

I mean, it is just over the top, outrageously bad what is going on! And I mean, it already, it started a while back, but now it’s just accelerated to beyond belief! And, you know what you say:

 

“Okay, there’s hypersexual or over sexualization of children at too young, of age.”

 

This arrests, arrests their emotional development.

 

Grace: And many other things. And it’s like, I think this was the metaphor I gave to you. It’s like you cannot force open a flower to blossom while it’s in the bud. You would damage it forever! You have to have patience, and it has to grow. Everyone, basically, personally, you have to discover so-called sex or sexuality in some ways on your own, because the internal makings of a human being is far more complicated. And you have to let it blossom in quotation Mark “naturally”, because we have been so cut off from nature. So everyone has to kind of figure it out by refining their instinct.

 

But it’s just like children can mimic words to appear sophisticated, but to have had the experience to back it up.

 

And frankly, there was a Japanese writer that said he feels sorry for the younger generation of Japanese because in Japanese there is a word for “love”, and there is another word specifically for “falling in love”. And he said that children have no time, basically, to discover that mysterious emotion of falling in love, for example.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes.

 

Grace: And the other thing is you know why I think the other thing is, in childhood you must play a lot!

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes.

 

Grace: It’s very important. Well, one of the things, and also you can’t, I think, the way they keep the children so occupied. So yeah. Because sometimes you must have a lot of breathing space and you must sometimes even be bored for you to become creative. I wonder if that’s an oxymoron.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, you’re absolutely right! I’ll just tell you, the German word for “boredom” is “Langeweile”, which literally means “long while”.

 

So it’s a completely different meaning on that. And I love that.

 

But, you know what? We have a couple of callers on the line.

 

Kathleen: Yes.

 

Monika Schaefer: And let’s take Kathleen from Texas.

 

Hello, Kathleen, are you there?

 

Kathleen: Hey, Monika and Grace. A great show. And I called because I heard an author interviewed about ten years ago, maybe on RBN, and he wrote a book called the “440 Conspiracy”. And it was all about. I heard him interviewed several times. It was very interesting. And he had said many of the things you’re talking about, but he was talking about that 432 was actually what everybody played before the Rockefeller changed it to all the marching bands of the horns were all made with the 440. And it was unnerving, and it was very good to get people nervous and upset about going to war or something.

 

Monika Schaefer: Well, is that something? So that sounds like a good book. Grace Eki, are you familiar with that book?

 

Grace: No, I don’t know that book. So thank you.

 

Monika Schaefer: Who was the author, please?

 

Kathleen: I don’t know that. I don’t remember the author’s name, but it was called, The 440 Conspiracy.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay, I’m gonna write that down and I’m gonna look that up. That’s great!

 

Kathleen: It was about ten years ago, so.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay, thank you. Do you have any additional comments?

 

Kathleen: No, I love your show. I mean, I heard you for a long time before you had the show. And you just been great. So I’ve enjoyed every one. And thank you so much!

 

Monika Schaefer: Thank you so much, Kathleen, for your call.

 

[45:22]

 

Kathleen: Yes. Oh, I loved it when you said that you’re an ice skater in the wild. [chuckling]

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. [chuckling]

 

Kathleen: Wild skating. Oh, that’s so great.

 

And then all of your music, it’s wonderful! And, Grace, I really appreciated everything that you said, too.

 

Grace: Okay. So thank you so much!

 

Monika Schaefer: Well, thank you for your call. Okay. So, Mr producer, could we please have Nightingale on line three? Are you there?

 

Nightingale: Yes. Monika, can you hear me?

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, we can. Thank you. Would you like to add a comment or question?

 

Nightingale: Thank you so much! I’m overjoyed to meet you. I want to say it’s an honor to meet such a brave, talented, honorable lady. Thank you so much! Just a fact that you play the music for your bumper music. I said, wow, RBM is getting classy. Fun! [chuckling] It was so beautiful! What a change. Usually I shut the bumpers off. Some of the host I listen to, I run to the phone and say:

 

“I don’t want to hear that!”

 

And I wait till the ads and the music are gone. [chuckling]

 

But with you, …

 

Monika Schaefer: That’s sweet of you. Thank you. Did you have any questions or comments for your guest, Grace Eki?

 

Nightingale: Yes, yes, I’m getting there. This has been fascinating! I just turned it on. Sometimes I listen live, sometimes it doesn’t work for me. I’m always on the cell phone, but sometimes it does a bit, and I turn it on just when your wonderful guest, her name is Grace. She’s been very, very personal to me. What I heard, very fascinating! She talked about a beautiful., … It was a beautiful anecdote. She thinks it’s from Mozart. That “music is painted on the canvas of silence”.

 

And I wanted to add that that is so beautiful, because it’s not just music, but it’s, I think, pretty much everything. Mystic experiences, the feeling of sacred is also. Everybody talks about it. All the mystics are on the, come out of silence. Even our myths of creation come out of silence. Things were “created by the word”, Elvero Incarnado, which is Spanish. What is it, the word incarnate? I don’t know if that’s that. But yeah, but it’s sound. Started creating the manifest world, I guess.

 

So this is very, very beautiful. And I heard many beautiful things. I heard the comment about spirituality, Rudolf Steiner ideas, spirituality developed later on.

 

But I have to say that I have to disagree with that a bit because I had, personally, some very mystical experiences. A very, very young child. And they did start going away. I totally agree with the over sexualization, because I think that’s when they started going away for me. Sex was just very much in my face with the world I lived in, my parents, and a lot of violence and jealousy! [chuckling] And it was always sad for me as a very young child.

 

But then when I hit puberty, I was very, very curious, and I did naughty things. You know, I wanted to see what this wonderful thing was. Right? And I learned that it wasn’t what it was touted to be. If love is not involved, if the falling in love, like you mentioned, but it can be a lot of fun. But it’s not falling in love. That’s a totally different thing.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Nightingale: This has been very personal, what you were speaking of, because, yes, I had a, as a very young person before I was into sex, you might say, I had even incredible out of body experience, which I will always cherish. I hope that just before I die, I get there again, because it was like total unity.

 

I don’t know if you guys ever felt that, but the only experience I’ve ever had that I reserved the word “bliss” for. And it was just, it was just fascinating because I was totally not there. But you’re in everything when you exist, I guess, what people call a cosmic consciousness. And it was this overwhelming, powerful light that was so incredibly beautiful.

 

But then I was, it was going to annihilate me, which is a very mystery because I was not there, and yet I felt totally annihilation. And somewhere, I guess I was very young, somewhere in the body, I guess I wasn’t ready to go. And I was at the moment, so I realized that fear the root of all our issues, because it was fear that brought me back into the body. And then I felt so horrible to be back in the cave, and I just hated myself for being a coward! But someday maybe it’ll come back and I’ll be ready too.

 

Monika Schaefer: That’s an incredibly profound experience. Thank you for sharing that, Grace Aki, do you have any comments about it?

 

Nightingale: Well, it has a lot. Yes. It relates to everything you’re speaking of and I think I was lucky enough, even though I did have a very turmoil, not very happy household growing up. And yet my father did play classical music, and so I was imprinted with that. And it was the old vinyls, I must say! [chuckling]

 

And I think that is what, …

 

Monika Schaefer: Sorry, go ahead. Grace, did you want to comment on that.

 

Grace: Yes. That I wanted to say. I agree with her. You know, silence is the base of everything. And she was saying the Bible, I think. No, sorry the Testament in the beginning was the word, and word was “God”, but the word is “vibration with intent”. And I do kind of agree and with silence will show how important this intent and so-called vibration is, even more in the future.

 

And as speaking, I just wanted to make a comment as far as the frequency is concerned. You know those famous water crystals?

 

[51:52]

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes.

 

Grace: Photographed. Well, if it’s the ones I have seen anyway, at A 432, it actually makes a flower. At A 4040, it makes the outline. It’s different.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes. And it scrambles it, doesn’t it? That’s what I’ve seen and heard.

 

Grace: Oh, it’s not as beautiful as 432. 432 definitely looks like a flower.

 

Monika Schaefer: Isn’t that something?

 

Grace: Yeah. Interesting!

 

Monika Schaefer: So, Nightingale, did you want to make a quick final comment? And then we’ll let you go, and I really appreciate that you called in and shared a your story with us. Yes, Nightingale.

 

Grace: Oh, perhaps she’s already gone.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay, so let’s have John in New Hampshire, please. Are you there? Okay, yeah, that’s great! You see, this is such an interesting subject. I find it just fascinating! And the vibrations, the music, and then, of course, this. Go ahead.

 

John: Hello? Am I on?

 

Monika Schaefer: You are on. Is this John?

 

John: Right, right. Okay. Thanks a lot, ladies. That Grace perked me up because when she mentioned Verdi, I was born in the same province as Giuseppe Verdi, Parma. I was very, very happy to hear that. And I’m wondering maybe, hopefully, maybe I can get in touch with her. And I got some interesting stuff.

 

So maybe somehow we can get connected through you, Monika, or through the board. I don’t mean to be rude, but I also would like to see if I could get in touch with Kathleen from Texas. I’ve been trying to get in touch with her, too. So maybe through the board op or something. But if you could call back in, or I could leave my number or something like that.

 

But anyway, yeah, this is a very fascinating conversation. And that, Grace, you’re a pretty amazing, remarkable woman!

 

And, I mean, I love my Italian heritage and I love, … I was born in Parma, but I was only 14 months when I came to this country. But most of my relatives still live in Italy. So maybe we can get in touch or something like that. But anyway. Okay, see what you can do.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay, I’ll just tell you how you can get in touch with me. My email address is posted on RBN. If you go to the host the page where they have my brief bio and that kind of thing. There is a, an email address posted there. Okay. So you could get in touch with me and then I could send your, I’ll get you connected with Grace.

 

John: Okay, I appreciate that. Do you think that would be a good way to get in touch with Kathleen from Texas?

 

Monika Schaefer: I have no idea. You’ll have to perhaps take that up with the producer. [chuckling]

 

John: Okay, great!

 

Monika Schaefer: So, yeah, and if you have a brief comment, final comment, because we have a couple of more callers on the line.

 

John: No, no, no, I’ll go, I’ll defer to them.

 

Monika Schaefer: So if that was John, thank you so much for your call. We have John from California.

 

Another John, are you there?

 

John: Yeah. So 528. I don’t know what, you know, about it. Good frequency or bad frequency?

 

Monika Schaefer: I don’t know. That’s a good question. Grace Eki, do you know, this 528?

 

Grace: I think it’s like you. Continue. I think it’s just a, C higher.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, I don’t know. I think I’ve heard things about it that are actually kind of terrifying about it, but I don’t know. I’m not sure. [chuckling] What do you know, about it, John?

 

John: Yes, well, I don’t know a lot about it. I know that it’s titled. There’s a guest, I won’t use names that comes on this RBN that claims it to be a love frequency. But I’ve heard from others that it’s a not so much.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. This is something we’re gonna have to do some more research on. Maybe the next caller will know. [chuckling]

 

Grace: But let me add that everything has a plus and a minus, the yin and the yang. So something that’s positive in one sense is possible, that it’s very, quite negative in another sense. But I’ve heard of this number. I think it was just, 2056 that you keep on going higher up. But I could be wrong.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay. John, did you have anything like to add?

 

John: Well, yeah, I don’t know a lot about it. Supposedly it’s called Esophageal [sp]. I don’t know if I pronounced it correctly, which was something that was kind of in Rome, they had this thing kind of under wraps for a long time. And supposedly someone got a hold of this following. It’s supposed to come from the Bible and, …

 

Anyway, I just wondered what you knew about it. But thank you very much. Great show.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay. Thank you for your call. Let’s take Chris from Alabama. And we really literally have just, 20 seconds left or so. chris, are you there?

 

Chris: Yeah. Hi, Monika. Sometimes when I have more time. I’m Chris from Alabama. I moved here from California along. I live in California. Born there in 57, married a Canadian woman in 88, and she’s lived in the United States for all this time. We’ve been to Canada many times. British Columbia.

 

Monika Schaefer: Did you have something for our guests?

 

Chris: That book is called The 440 Enigma, and it’s basically trying to blame the 440 frequency on a collaboration between the Rockefellers and the Nazis. And it has a swastika on the cover of it. And like everything else, they want to blame everything on the Nazis! I’m just adding that right now.

 

Monika Schaefer: Ha! Thanks for that. It does sound like we know that they’re lying to us about who are the “Nazis”, quote, unquote, and what they did and all that stuff. So that’s a little bit suspect, isn’t it? And the producer did write in the notes. Maybe it’s The 440 Enigma by LC Vincent.

 

Grace. Do you have a final comment? Just while the music is taking us out?

 

Chris: It’s a pleasure listening to you.

 

Grace: Yes. I wanted to say that, remember that your voice is the free gift of so-called God and nature, an instrument you already have inside and so is your body. And I think it’s in our DNA to love, to dance and sing, and it should help one when one that’s not really so happy. Thank you.

 

Monika Schaefer: Beautiful! Thank you for being my guest, and thank you to all the callers. Thank you very much.

 

Monika Schaefer: And thank you to the producer, too. Awesome job!

 

Grace: Thank you.

 

Monika Schaefer: Keeping everybody straight. Okay, bye bye.

 

[59:01]

[music]

[59:05]

[ad]

[59:59]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

RBN Comments

top

(Comments as of 8/25/2024 = 0)

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 1 – Intro – Jun 29, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 2 – Jul 6, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 03 with Paul Fromm – Jul 13, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 08 with Alfred Schaefer – Aug 17, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 15 with Jürgen Neumann on Ernst Zündel – Oct 12, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

 

 

 

Jacob Hersant: The never ending tide of non-White immigration is drowning us! We are but 25 million in Australia and New Zealand, ten thousand miles from our brothers in Europe and surrounded by a Third World coloured masses. Everywhere we look, we see the foreign faces leering with thoughts of taking their land!

But make no mistake about it, they’re guests here and they’re unwelcome! It’s our civilisation! These islands belong to us, and we’ll fight for them! That’s what they’ll never understand. These scum that leave their kind to parasitise off us! With the nerve to insult and make demands of us in our country!

Yet what do they offer us to return? They can only pollute our blood and dishonour the estate our ancestors left us. The time has come to set us back! No more apathy! No more patience! No more tolerance! Get out! Australia for the Whiteman! The rest must go! Mass deportation now! Blood and honour! Blood and honour! Blood and honour! Blood and honour! Australia for the Whiteman! The rest must go! Australia for the Whiteman! The rest must go! Shut up you race traitor! Hail victory! Hail victory!

 

Joel Davis: Just realised my mic was muted.

 

Another show Thursday night.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was going to tell you bro, you’re muted.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, Thursday night, August 1, 2024, 8:30 Australian Eastern Time. So another show. Tom can’t make it tonight. He’s got a family engagement. I was actually going to get Jacob Hersant, but didn’t quite work out. I might do a stream with him separately to discuss some things in the future, but it’s going to be Blair and I this evening.

 

And yeah, Joel and Blair show has Joel and Blair on it, so should be an interesting show. I got one Superchat from Ukrainian Groyper that said:

 

“Hey, Joel, they banned your Telegram channel for the iPhone users.”

 

Yeah, I got my Telegram channel got App blocked on both just like ten minutes or 15 minutes before we went live on the stream. So that kind of sucks! I might have to make a new Telegram as a result. It’s kind of inexplicable. I don’t think I really posted anything outrageous lately in comparison to what I generally post, so don’t know why that happened, but once it happens, you can’t reverse it.

 

Like it happened to Tom Sewell’s channel. And there’s no appeal process. I mean, you can still access my Telegram if you download the a directly from the Telegram website onto your Android phone or on the web a if you use Telegram on a computer, on a desktop. If you’re on an iPhone, basically, you can’t access Telegram without the blockages that they put on certain channels without going through the browser.

 

So that’s quite annoying for Apple users.

 

And so it’s kind of just annoying in general when you get App blocked because it kind of takes out maybe a third of your audience from being able to see your channel.

 

So maybe more so that really sucks, but it is what it is. We soldier on!

 

But yeah, Blair, how are you feeling this evening?

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Fine. I actually saw your channel get censored because I shared the link for this stream. It was visible. I was using an Apple device when I shared it, and then I checked it five minutes later and I couldn’t see it anymore. So I said:

 

“Bro, you’ve just been Apple banned!”

 

And it’s pretty annoying because it reduces your channel traffic by at least 50% because at least half people out there are still using iPhones. It’s iPhone technology is good. It’s easy, and so it draws in the people who want to be using the easy services.

 

But you can make a Joel Davis alerts channel like Tom did, just to keep everyone., … You can keep using your main channel and just make, like, a secondary alerts channel that’s not censored, that can still reach people. The amount of people who are using Telegram, dissidents, people who are interested in nationalism, seems to have reduced somewhat since those lockdowns and vaccine mandates.

 

Joel Davis: Because Twitter was bought by Elon Musk and Twitter is just a better platform now.

 

Blair Cottrell: Definitely! Everyone’s moved over to X. Telegram is still a reliable alternative, but it seems to be most of the traffic is moving through X at the moment. So Telegram is still a sort of corner alternative platform, and you’re still allowed to post on X, is that right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, my Twitter’s fine.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I don’t see the point in having one, like, two different channels.

 

And, I mean, I’ll keep the other one up for a little while I transition, but it seems better to just make a whole new channel. And I’m sure the majority of the audience that actually check the channel will probably move over.

 

[06:12]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s annoying that you don’t have any information about why you’ve been censored. There’s no appeal process. You don’t actually understand what’s going on. Like, you’re just kind of targeted because of who you are. But that’s the way censorship seems to roll out these days. It’s like you didn’t really say anything specifically that they’re concerned about. It’s just everything you believe and who you are, that’s the problem.

 

Joel Davis: It’s not the Telegram platform either that makes a decision. I think it’s like the a itself, like, Google and Apple impose it upon Telegram in order for them to have an a on the a store. So, like, what are you supposed to do? Appeal the ban to like, Apple and Google, it’s so convoluted.

 

So, yeah, there is no recourse. It’s the probably the main issue with the Telegram app, which is otherwise quite good, quite reliable. There have been instances where people have been banned outright from Telegram, but that’s, I think, almost always because they’re outright advocating calling for like a genocide or something quite explicit in a quite explicit way or something like this. And even still, you can usually get away with that kind of thing.

 

Or they, like the state, like specifically requests Telegram to take a particular channel down. I believe that probably is what happened to Tom’s first channel that was taken down. Um, it was probably literally like the Australian security services that requested it of Telegram.

 

But that is quite rare. So in this instance, that’s not what happened to me. I think what happened is probably just getting mass reported by the various political enemies that we have.

 

And eventually it’s succeeding.

 

Blair Cottrell: I have made something of a conscious effort to not get Apple banned by Telegram. And so far it seems to have worked. The effort I have made is just not to post that much.

 

And then when I do posts, I word things in such a way where it’s not so explicit or vulgar. You’ll notice that I go through periods where I’m like making a lot of content and then I calm down for a while and go through a rest period. This is for a couple of reasons. Like recently, I haven’t been posting much content because work’s picked up for me and I’ve needed to make some extra money because I was a bit behind in my personal life.

 

But I also don’t mind taking a break because it just kind of takes the heat off you. The all seeing eye of international jewry, you might say, kind of just overlooks you because you’re not really posting for a while. Then you can pop up again and make some videos for a couple of months. And you can take a break again for a couple of months. It seems to have worked so far, but I could be wrong. They could just target me next and I’d just be eating my words.

 

So I don’t know.

 

But the point is that I am concerned about being censored. Unfortunately, that’s just the game we’re in. And I try to balance my posting in such a way where I’m less likely to be censored, although I probably still will be eventually.

 

It’s a very frustrating game we have to play with these platforms, but it’s just the way it is.

 

The worst thing you can allow censorship to do is affect your own thoughts and perspective, though censorship can have that effect. If you’re so geared towards avoiding censorship, you can actually start changing your own thoughts and words. And, well, if you change your words enough to suit censorship standards, you’ll end up thinking differently.

 

And I think it can then have an impact on your psychology and even on your fundamental philosophy and perspective of the world. It’s very important not to let censorship do that.

 

But we obviously opened up this stream with a pretty cool video. Really good video, actually. I think it’s sick! Jacob’s peech. Jacob Hersant and some kind of flash activism. When did this occur? Joel? This particular rally? Was this recently?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So we marched on Saturday, a bit after 03:00 pm. I was there. Like, the rule basically is, and this is actually isn’t what my preference is, but what the current decision is in the group, is that we should have uniformity. All of us should have balaclavas on, except for the one speaker who’s going to do the speech. In this instance was Jacob. In the past, it has been Tom.

 

And I think actually, in one rally, maybe a smaller one, I think maybe Tim Lutz actually was leading that one and went mask off for that rally.

 

But personally, and this is how some of the prior rallies went, they had basically anyone who doesn’t care about being doxxed, who’s already maybe a known figure, would have their face out. Everyone else would have to mask on. But the argument is that breaks down the kind of uniformity. The idea is to have this idea of anyone could be in the march, and to create this certain kind of Enigmatic vibe. I get the logic behind it.

 

So I had a mask on, as everyone else did other than Jacob. I was actually standing next to Jacob for the majority of the rally.

 

[11:25]

 

 

So basically what happened was that we formed up near the Immigration Museum, and for those who don’t know Melbourne, the Immigration Museum is just down the road down Flinders Street from Federation Square, which is a kind of prominent point in the kind of middle of the city, across the road from Flinders Street Station, which is, I think, the biggest train station in the city of Melbourne.

 

And so the objective was to basically form up at the Immigration Museum, snap a photo at the front of it, and then march down adjacent to the Yarra river, which runs through the centre of Melbourne down to the Federation Square, where we would kind of form up and do a speech and so on, make a little bit of a scene. There’s a lot of foot traffic around there, although it was quite a dreary day, actually. It was raining on and off. When we marched, the rain had died down, but it was periodically raining on and off, and it was quite cold, so there wasn’t as much foot traffic as you’d usually get.

 

But nevertheless, there were people about.

 

And so we formed up there in a couple places, and Jacob, you know, gave some speeches and we did some chants. Just made a bit of a scene, as we customarily do. Then we kind of Marched across the road, formed up in front of the train station. And as we formed up in front of the train station, I started to notice the police had started to react. And cop car after cop car was pulling up, and more and more police were forming up into a larger and larger blob.

 

And I said to Jacob:

 

“We probably want to get moving, [chuckling] because it looks like they’re about to kind of set upon us.”

 

But Jacob had other ideas and just kind of got on the front foot, [chuckling] kept yelling into the megaphone, and ultimately the police targeted him. So they must have been about eight or ten police, and they just kind of surrounded Jacob, grabbed onto him, said:

 

“Jacob Hersant, you’re under arrest!”

 

And just all grabbed him instantly.

 

So there wasn’t really much that could be done to prevent that without committing a crime and, like, violently resisting arrest.

 

So that was at the point at which we decided, let’s get the hell out of here. Because what’s the point of all of us getting arrested? We basically already finished the march at that point.

 

So we started moving off as a group, and we got out of there. The police grabbed on to some of us, including me, and just kind of like, just pulled my sleeve away, and they kind of gave up trying to grab us, and we all left, went home.

 

So that was the situation. But Jacob was arrested. They didn’t actually charge Jacob yet. They took him into the police station and processed him and threatened to charge him with this crime called “grossly offensive behaviour”, which is a crime in the state of Victoria. Most other states in Australia don’t have this as a crime. It’s actually quite a recent addition to the Crimes Act of Victoria, and in my opinion, is a totally ridiculous law. I mean, what is “grossly offensive behaviour”? This is such a vague and general notion.

 

I think, actually, we talked about up the stream before. I think Tom talked about the infamous so-called Dick Pusey incident. This guy, Richard Pusey was his name. I believe he had some interaction with a police officer. I think he got pulled over for speeding while high on cocaine or something like this, and the police officer got hit by an oncoming car. I believe. I could be misremembering this, so apologies if I get the details slightly wrong.

 

And I believe he kind of had a really callous reaction of filming him on his phone and laughing at him, rather than aiding the police officer, I think might have actually died. And this was considered such a horrible thing, but it wasn’t a crime to laugh at a dead police officer. So they brought in this so-called grossly offensive behaviour law, I believe, as a way to put something on the books so that when someone engages in particularly “callous and heinous behaviour”, they said at the time that they could go after them.

 

But in this instance, the pretext is a political march. Now, in Australia, we do have an implied right to a political free expression under the Constitution.

 

So if they do decide to try and charge Jacob with this crime, we’ll see them in court. And I would anticipate that we would have a good chance, actually, of success. And that would be fantastic, actually, if they would charge Jacob, because then we could attack this in court and basically try and maybe even countersue the police for denying us our political constitutional rights. But that would be a very long process.

 

And they still haven’t charged him yet. I guess they’re still weighing up whether they think it strategically makes sense, because what they have done, basically, if they don’t charge Jacob, is that they’ve invoked a law that probably is unconstitutional and shouldn’t really be applied in this context anyway, to a political rally. There’s no precedent for it.

 

But then if they don’t actually place the charge, they don’t actually have to defend this in court, but they can still use that as a pretext to make an arrest and break up the rally and basically prevent us from engaging in our, what is lawful political activity. So it just shows the lengths that the state is willing to go to mess with us, really, where we weren’t doing anything that required police intervention. We were literally marching around peacefully, giving speeches, making chants with a sign with a big banner that said, Mass Deportations Now!

 

At the RNC [Republican National Convention] in the United States, a week or two ago, there were a bunch of boomers holding up Mass Deportations Now signs in the crowd while Trump was speaking and stuff, and other people were speaking at the Republican National Convention. This is a mainstream political idea. Senator Malcolm Roberts of the One Nation party from Queensland, he called for mass deportations on Twitter a few months ago.

 

So we weren’t really engaging in rhetoric that was particularly extreme, even by our own standards! So this, to be considered grossly offensive, is basically crossing a line where now basically they want to say that it’s illegal to advocate for a political position, that, I wouldn’t say that maybe the majority of Australians would agree with, but a very substantial minority of Australians, if polled – haven’t seen any polling on mass deportations in particular – but I would anticipate there would be a significant portion of the public that would support such a thing. And regardless of the percentage of the public that would support such a thing, we’re supposed to have political rights and freedoms under, quote, unquote, “liberal democracy” in this country.

 

So it was a particularly egregious act of political policing. And we will look at probably what we can do legally about this.

 

[18:23]

 

 

But in addition, this law is also being used in a couple other applications. I think it’s being used to go after people who did the Roman salute. I think Nathan Bull is one of the members, Nathan Bull and Michael Nelson, who infamously threw Roman salutes in the city while wearing a provocative T-shirt which had like a Chud Jack on it and said:

 

“6 million. That’s a bit much, mate!”

 

We’ve covered this on the show before. This was one of, before the Roman salute was made illegal under these more recent laws that they’ve brought in to ban the Roman salute and the swastika and so on in public display.

 

But this was before those laws, so they’re saying:

 

“But it was grossly offensive behaviour.”

 

So that’s now before the courts. So those court cases are active. I anticipate there’s going to be a big legal battle against this idea, this notion of “grossly offensive behaviour” as a way to stifle political speech.

 

And I think it’s important that we maybe try and reach out to some of the libertarians. Some of the libertarians don’t agree with us on a lot, but supposedly they care about political freedom of expression. And so insofar as they do care about these things, it will be consistent for them to actually come and defend it in this instance.

 

So if anyone is out there listening, who’s in the libertarian sphere, or who has associates in the libertarian sphere, or who’s a lawyer who wants to help, who wants to give legal advice or whatever, get in contact, because this is really where the battleground for Australian free political expression is going on.

 

I mean, even from a non-nationalist perspective, if they can successfully implement this law to stifle our political speech, well, then what’s next? Then they’ll move on to the next controversial thing and the next controversial thing. They could use this under who knows what pretext. You know, you saw how tyrannical the state was during Covid against the Covid protesters.

 

The jews are now coming out and calling for the pro-Palestine protesters to face kind of legal repercussions. But who knows in coming years what pretexts and what political context they could try and extend this to, if they can successfully use it against us. So even if you don’t agree with our politics, you should come to our aid in this instance and come to our support.

 

But overall, I think the rally was a great success. Videos circulating from the rally accumulated almost a million views online over the past few days.

 

So that’s been very good to see a lot of public support. Even on the day, there was a lot of people that yelled out support at us, beebed their horns and put the thumbs up out the window of the car as we were walking down the street. There were some people that were filming us and they had kind of friendly expressions and so on.

 

Yeah, there were some Lefties that also had something to say as well, as you would expect in the middle of Melbourne. It’s a very Left-wing city.

 

But I would say the public reaction was pretty balanced.

 

A lot of people were just kind of interested, like:

 

“What is this?”

 

And what’s interesting as well that I find is that in these kinds of things, the non-Whites never have anything to say. Non-Whites just kind of like scurry past, whereas the, you either get White Leftists who yell out something negative or normal White people who give, like, a positive reaction.

 

So that’s kind of interesting.

 

But yeah, the idea with the rally was to do something that was kind of get in, march around, get out. We almost succeeded in doing that other than the Jacob Hersant arrest.

 

But maybe the Jacob Hersant arrest was in the grand scheme of things for the greater good, because maybe it’ll give us a chance to fight an unjust law here. And also it was all over the news.

 

So maybe that’s for the best to kind of get the message out that we’re out there and operative. So overall, I think we consider the rally to be a great success, and on to the next one.

 

But what do you think about all this, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I just wrote down a few points that I’ll make and a couple of questions for you as well.

 

But my take was that I was really impressed by the ferocity of Jacob’s speech. I’ve known Jacob since he was a kid. He was always smart, witty, loved to laugh, loved to joke. But I didn’t know he had that passion, that fire in his belly that I heard in his voice in the speech that he gave. And I was inspired! I was roused by it! It was a really good speech, and I’m really glad that he’s putting himself out there, like that. It was ballsy!

 

That’s what I said on my Telegram channel when I shared it’s ballsy stuff! Considering the current political climate and considering the fact that enemies to your country seem to have all the resources, to just throw yourself out there and speak your mind, stand up for what you believe and point out the truth! Because everything that Jacob said in that speech was the truth! It’s how things are.

 

But at this point, from what you’ve said, the information you’ve given about the day, it seems like Victoria police have just moved you on and haven’t formally charged you with anything criminal at this point. And Victoria police in Australia, they have the power to move protesters on if they believe it will prevent an incident. So they can just say:

 

“Oh, we believe there was going to be a violent incident, so we had to move them on to keep the peace.”

 

The thing is, though, they can’t really move you on if there’s enough of you that you can stand your ground and you don’t move on.

 

So if you can make these kind of flash protests more regular, to the extent where you’ve grown to two or 300 participants, at that point, the police couldn’t really move you on without excessive force and without making a real scene.

 

So I think maybe that could be the goal. You want to grow this kind of thing to the point where the police are forced to facilitate your rallies and you become a legitimate, regular protest, that happens in Melbourne. Because there’s heaps of regular protests that happen in Melbourne. And for that reason, in Melbourne, I, …

 

Joel Davis: I believe 21 protests a weekend!

 

[24:38]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: And many of them are much more aggressive than the protest you guys had.

 

So I think for that reason, there’s a lot for the police to think about if they’re going to charge you with some grossly offensive conduct, because if they’re going to charge you, they’re probably going to have to think about charging other protesters with something similar, and they’re going to be going up against all of Melbourne protest culture eventually. And there probably exists at least a few legal precedents where protesters have won against government intervention or overreaching, because there’s a lot of rights in Melbourne for public protest and political protest. It’s why everybody comes to Melbourne to host their protests.

 

There’s people in Melbourne from all over the world protesting about some country that I’ve never heard about. I walk through Melbourne and there’s these little, like, islander, Asian looking people holding some banner or flag that I’ve never even seen before, and they’re complaining about some dictator in their country in Melbourne. And I’m thinking, I don’t even know what’s going on here, know who these people are. That’s what Melbourne’s known for, right?

 

So, like I said, what I was getting at is it’s going to be a bit of a minefield for the department, Department of Public Prosecutions to successfully convict you guys of a criminal charge just for peacefully protesting. Because that was your intention, right? Your intention was to host a peaceful protest. Am I wrong?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. If they were going to charge anyone, it would exclusively be Jacob, because the rest of us literally walked around without saying anything.

 

Blair Cottrell: They could claim that something Jacob said or did was specifically offensive. So they could then argue that you’re not being charged for protesting, Jacob himself is individually being charged for something that he did, but nothing that he did or said seemed overly inflammatory or illegal.

 

So I don’t know how they gotta go about doing that. Like I said, it’s gonna be a lot of work for the prosecution to actually put this into practice. But they may try. I don’t think they will. It’s going to be too hard for them, I think. But they may try because they may want to get a precedent, a foot in the door, something they can use against these other protesters, namely the pro-Palestinian protesters who the jewish lobby and jewish groups in Australia who are very upset with these protesters, and they probably want some sort of legal precedent to work with towards shutting these protesters down as well.

 

So for that reason, the prosecution might actually, police prosecution might try to put a case together. However, I think it’s going to be pretty easy to defend against it.

 

As I said, though, this kind of activism, if it’s made more regular, it will normalise it. And then you can potentially grow your attendance to the point where you’re protected by your own numbers. And that’s the immediate thing that comes to mind for me, I don’t really have much more to add other than that. I was really kind of shocked and impressed by it. Like I said, it was really ballsy. Jacob has the fire in his belly, and, yeah, it was cool to see someone just speaking their mind on the street. You got to admire that. It doesn’t even matter if you don’t like this kind of activism or politics. You got to admit, it takes balls to do that in this day and age, in our current political climate.

 

So it was cool to see.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think people will criticise. They say:

 

“Oh, well, normal people might be a little freaked out by the masks, and why do you say mass deportations? Why don’t you go for a more toned down message and so on?”

 

And it’s well, there’s ample opportunity for anyone who wants to do that, to do that kind of thing. The objective, the main objective of mobilising in the way that we did is to try and appeal to a specific niche, to appeal to people with a more aggressive, militant mindset, people who want the whole enchilada. People who want the style that we’re putting forward, because we want to recruit those kinds of people into our organisation to get bigger. But also we want to create a kind of forceful expression of willpower.

 

Because the largest problem that we face as White people is not that we don’t have the correct marketing strategy for how to dress up our politics or that we don’t have the right arguments or, … The problem is that most White people are fucking pussies! That’s the problem. That’s the fundamental problem!

 

And until White people stop being pussies and start getting angry and start getting focused and organised and start putting our willpower into practice in the world and start manifesting our will in an outward way, in an ostensible way, and taking the challenge to the system. Nothing is going to change. Because the all these other races and all of our enemies, they, at the moment, laugh at us! They can’t believe how easy they have it, that we are just allowing them to run over us like this.

 

[29:38]

 

And basically, all the immigrants pouring in, the anti-White agenda infecting all the major institutions, the way in which they sap White men of their dignity, the way that they strip White women of any kind of safety or civilised security that they can expect when they’re out in the public. They can’t believe that we’re letting them get away with it. They can’t believe that we’re sending our kids to school where they can be picked on by gangs of Arabs or blacks, and the teachers are going to propagandize them with all this nonsense about how evil their ancestors were. They come to our country, they have no gratitude. They then tell us that:

 

“Well, it isn’t your country anyway. You stole it from the Aboriginals! And White people, you’re all convicts and so on.”

 

You’ve heard all the talking points. There’s no respect! And you only get respect in this world when you demand it. No one’s going to give it to you. And the same thing is true when it comes to political power. The same thing is true when it comes to political support. No one is going to support a political movement and be willing to make sacrifices and put their life on the line. I don’t mean necessarily die, but just make sacrifices, put in money, put in time, potentially take damage, maybe get fired from a job, maybe lose certain opportunities lose certain friends.

 

People aren’t going to be willing to make those kinds of sacrifices if there isn’t a leadership, if there isn’t a kind of Spearhead of people who have balls! Who have determination, who make them believe these guys are going to be going at it till the end. These people are completely committed. Their hearts are pure. They care for the cause. You know, you have to instil that confidence in people to make them follow you.

 

And that is true on a smaller scale in terms of just building our current movement, but also on a larger scale upon trying to convince the public that there is a far-Right that can actually do something, that actually can mobilise enough numbers that it can actually protect them in some way from what is happening.

 

Until we become a horse that’s strong enough to take the fight to the enemy, who’s going to back us? You know, you’re backing a losing horse at the moment. So the only reason people are going to back us is because we light a fire of passion in them and they really resonate. And that’s basically what we were trying to do on the weekend. We’re trying to say:

 

“Look, there’s 40 of us out here.”

 

I mean, that’s just the Melbourne guys. There’s people all around the country. And not all the Melbourne guys showed up. But we got 40 guys in the street this weekend. Wouldn’t it be better if it was 400? Wouldn’t it be better if it was 4,000? Well join us! And then eventually it will be.

 

And then when it’s 4,000, people see 4,000 people in the street, then they start believing in something quite different. They start actually taking the message very seriously. And it seems as though it’s a message that has force, manpower behind it, and it will make people believe.

 

And so when the time comes where there’s something that needs to be responded to, like what we’ve seen. I want to talk about what’s happened in England with the horrible stabbing murder of those three young girls by that African. And he stabbed a bunch of other children, like, between the ages of six and ten. I think the rest of them, hopefully, are going to make it. I don’t actually know the full update on all of their conditions, but he killed three little girls, injured I don’t know how many more, eight or nine more or something. And the English are in the streets. They’re actually responding. They’re showing that there’s a reaction. They’re showing that they’ve had enough, and it’s making other people wake up and go:

 

“You know what? You’re right! This is enough. This has gone too far!”

 

And people are organising and people are radicalising and so on.

 

They’re radicalising not because of what happened in particular, because what happened in particular is that kind of thing has happened before many times in England, and it’s happened all over Europe. But there wasn’t the same reaction. And so it didn’t really move people enough.

 

But now that there’s a reaction, it actually inspires people to develop and cultivate a fighting spirit in themselves. And if enough White people start cultivating that fighting spirit, then all of a sudden we have a political movement that can actually do something.

 

So that’s the objective of that kind of activism, and our kind of approach, is we’re not going for mass appeal. We’re not trying to tone ourselves down and be maximally agreeable, because agreeable, toned down white people are getting nowhere! They’re getting run over! They’ve been getting run over for decades. What we need is White people that have had enough of the bullshit, and they’re not interested in putting on the suit and the tie and toning down our attitude to meet the sensibilities of middle class conservative types that don’t actually want to put anything on the line, that don’t want to risk anything. They just want to be able to vote for a party that solves the problem for them. That’s not how it’s going to work. How it’s going to work is thousands and thousands of men willing to go into the streets.

 

So that’s who we’re trying to appeal to. We’re trying to find that next 1,000 men that’ll come stand in the street with us.

 

And the only way that you can do that is by going and standing in the street and saying:

 

“Hey, come join us! Look, we’re ready!”

 

[35:09]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: I think increasing the frequency of the protests, as I said before, and also leaning heavily on that “right to peaceful protests” and obeying the law as much as you can, I think that’ll help you guys out a lot.

 

But you mentioned something earlier which I thought was interesting, even though you were standing there and Jacob was screaming “Australia for the Whiteman”, calling for mass deportations and so forth. Speaking of non-White races, you mentioned that non-White people passing by didn’t say anything. They didn’t really pay attention. They kind of just scurried away. And it got me, it got me thinking just now, is mass immigration and multiculturalism an exclusively White programme and policy?

 

And I think it is.

 

And while White governments kind of implement these policies and debate whether they’re good enough or whether they’re being moral or anti-racist enough, people who aren’t White, they just actually take advantage of those policies and then privately laugh about it.

 

So I think that’s why they don’t actually react when things like this happen, because they probably don’t feel that it’s their right to do so or that it’s in their interest to do so, or it’s just in their interest to take advantage of the policy and to kind of fly under the radar. I don’t know. What do you think?

 

Joel Davis: I mean, there’s plenty of approaches that people can take. Like, as I have said before, anyone that wants to do anything that is vaguely supportive of White interests and White nationalism, like, as long as you’re not like raping kids or doing something additionally that’s completely egregious that I can’t cosign, i’ll support you! Because anyone doing anything is better than nothing!

 

And I believe in honouring people that put in work, trying to advance our cause and the race. So there’s lots of different approaches that can make sense for different strategic reasons, but the idea is someone has to go full balls out and go:

 

“You know what? We’re going to take the fight to the enemy!”

 

Obviously as legal, like within the legal framework. No overstepping the legal Mark outside of these grossly offensive behaviour, bullshit laws that they’re trying to use. But not overstepping any actual laws.

 

And then the idea with that is we’ll march right up to the limit of what’s possible and what’s acceptable. And that’s going to appeal very much to a fraction of the population that are people that are potential radicals, people that are likely to actually devote their life to, like, White nationalist activism. And then we’re going to try and recruit that 1% or recruit that 3% into the movement.

 

And then you can have a movement of people who are really, really radical that then can then really, like, push the boundary of what’s acceptable and inspire the rest of the population, stretch the Overton Window and so on. That’s the idea.

 

And then there’s a whole bunch of other groups that can kind of fill in behind that and occupy different strategic positions behind that. The idea that us doing what we’re doing is going to make people less racist or something. Like:

 

“Oh, there’s guys in Balaclava’s marching around, therefore, I don’t like racism anymore or something.”

 

It doesn’t really make any sense. I don’t think that’s how anyone thinks. The public response whenever I’ve done these things has actually been more positive than negative, which I actually found surprising. I was expecting it to be more negative than positive.

 

So I think a lot of average working class White Aussies, they kind of appreciate the ballsy style of the way that we go about things.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s not what the mainstream media said, though. The mainstream media report was, well, they made it their business to broadcast in their report that passerbys and the public did not support you.

 

But because they went out of their way to put that in their broadcast to make that part of their quick little story about you guys the opposite might be true. You can see that there’s a strong effort by the what would you call the institutional class, the media class, to reinforce into the minds of their viewers that:

 

“People do not support this!”

 

They kind of try to tell people what’s popular and what’s not popular, what they should support and what they shouldn’t support. And they were very quick to hone in on a couple of people who allegedly said something negative to you guys when you were protesting.

 

But my question for you earlier was, why do you think, or you remarked that non-White people didn’t react to your protests? Why do you think that is?

 

Joel Davis: I think non-Whites don’t react, number one, because they’re intimidated. And I think a lot of them like a lot of the non-Whites in Melbourne are like Asians, Indians. I mean, these people are not known for being particularly confrontational.

 

So I think it’s partly because of that.

 

But yeah, I think it’s also because I don’t think they feel the same kind of moral indignation because I think a lot of them realise that they’re outsiders and they’re just kind of making hay while the sun shines and almost can’t believe how accepting and permissive White people are because no other reason.

 

[41:10]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s like they themselves understand better how foreign to Australia they are, than kind of like White liberals or White people in Australia who are educated from a young age to see outsiders and foreigners as Australians as well. Everyone’s Australian. But the people who actually come from other countries into this country, even people who are born of families of immigrants, they still feel and understand that they’re not from here. They’re not native to the Australian nation as it was established by the British colonials. And I do see this phenomenon all the time. They themselves, foreigners, understand how foreign they are.

 

Yet White people who grow up in Australia are taught not to see them as different. And they actually fully believe that these people are equal to them. We are raised from a young age to believe that. And a lot of people do still thoroughly believe that’s the conditioning of human equality program.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think basically the White liberals that express their indignation as well, the thing is they have to morally differentiate themselves from their own Whiteness. They have to kind of come to terms with their own Whiteness as individual White people within our culture.

 

And so if they come to terms with their own Whiteness in the way that Leftists do, by pathologizing White Identity and kind of seeing Nazis as the most evil thing ever and so on, and develop this kind of out-group sensitivity, really a traitor mindset, frankly, then that’s going to become very important and integral to their identity.

 

Whereas if you’re just like some Asian immigrant, how you feel about Nazis actually isn’t really that important, because you don’t have to kind of contend with:

 

“Could I be a Nazi? Am I a racist?”

 

And have to go through some kind of cuckery within your own, like some kind of subconscious cuckery of your own, like racially charged thoughts or something:

 

“Oh, I had a racist thought. I’m so terrible. I must never allow myself to think that again or something!”

 

So it’s kind of like this thing with White people.

 

Blair Cottrell: I had an argument once in a taxi when I was younger. A couple of friends and I were getting a taxi home from a pub, and the Taxi Driver was Indian, and I was ranting to my friends because I had a couple of drinks. I don’t often drink, and I can handle my drinks. I don’t not drink because I can’t handle it. I just prefer not to drink. That’s why I don’t do it.

 

But when I do drink, I can get a little bit of that confidence kicks in. And I was trying to explain to my friends that people who weren’t White or descendant from the colonials, they weren’t actually Australians, and they themselves understood that they weren’t Australians, right? But my friends were arguing with me and saying:

 

“Nah, man. Like, as long as they obey our laws and live by our standards, and they’re Australians, too.”

 

But I used the taxi driver, the Indian character, driving the taxi, as an example, and I questioned him. I said:

 

 

 

“This guy himself.”

 

Let’s just say his name was Sadid or something. I said:

 

“Sadid, you’re not Australian, right? You’re from India, you’re not like me. We are different. You’re foreign to this country. Correct?”

 

And he says:

 

“Yes.”

 

I said:

 

“Right, so you’re Indian. You’re a different race to me. We’re not the same. Correct?”

 

He says:

 

“Correct.”

 

I said:

 

“So you would put your people first because that’s who you identify with. And I could be expected to do the same thing. Fair?”

 

And the Taxi Driver was like:

 

“Yeah.”

 

And I said to my friends:

 

“Well, there it is. Plain as day! Plain as the nose on your face, boys!”

 

And they still argued with me. They still said:

 

“Nah, nah, he’s just as Aussie as we are, man. He’s an Aussie as well.”

 

I said:

 

“He just said that he wasn’t!”

 

I said:

 

“He just openly told you that he’s foreign. He doesn’t consider himself Australian, and you’re still trying to argue that he’s Australian. He himself doesn’t even say that!”

 

I couldn’t believe that it’s like a core memory for me because it eally demonstrated the ignorance and the level of brainwashing of my own people in my own country. And it’s sometimes hard not to resent my own people, but I decide to regard them as victims of bad influence rather than being stupid or deliberately bad. And that gets me in the mood to spread some good influence and help people.

 

But, yeah, that’s, I thought that would be an interesting story to add to the equation.

 

Joel Davis: Well, on the leftist question, to me there’s two kinds of Leftists. There’s I think there’s what I would call “spiteful Leftists” or “bio Leftists”, where someone who is seriously biologically defective, whether it be mainly in their mental illness constitution, but generally it corresponds to physical weakness, physical ailments, sickness of the body of various kinds, being ugly, being small. If you feel like you, like, lesser than the average person, you feel like you basically got the short end of the genetic stick, then you’re going to be kind of quite resentful. You’re going to have this deep resentment towards White people who are actually healthy and noble. Resentful towards the standard racial hierarchy. And you’re going to be kind of turned off by any kind of ideology which celebrates hierarchy or celebrates certain virtues that are basically distributed to people better than you.

 

And so, you know how can you get revenge on all the chads and the Stacy’s? Obviously through this kind of egalitarian moral inversion.

 

And then you can then ally with out-groups against your own people as a way to then basically invert the status hierarchy. And you can dress it all up as you being a moral and superior person.

 

[47:30]

 

So I think for those people, I think those people, there’s no saving them. And they’re just basically like our biological enemies. They might as well be reclassified as of a different race because they’re such a defective part of our race that they’ve basically become differentiated into this totally distinct biological entity from us.

 

But then, and that’s, I think, a minority.

 

But then the majority of people with Leftist views are what I would call like “status seeking Leftists”.

 

And I think a lot of people are kind of conformist by nature. And just because the prevailing moral sensibilities of our time are Leftist, they basically think:

 

“Well, this is the values of all these institutions and determines the culture and the social status around me.”

 

And so they internalise those values and they don’t actually really think about it too deeply.

 

I think a lot of people, they just kind of internalise the values around them:

 

“Well, everyone else around me seems to believe this stuff, so it’s obviously true.”

 

And then anyone who challenges that, they then perceive as there’s something weird about this person. Why is this person thinking differently and violating all the moral norms that seem to be holding together the social space that I’m participating in and I have all these incentives to agree with so I just tell myself I agree with it internally because it’s just so much psychologically easier for me to just believe all of this stuff than to have to actually think about it because I don’t want to be cut off from society. This is all like subconscious thoughts that I’m describing.

 

So I think there’s a lot of people like that. Where if we had a society that was more Right-wing in its culture, they would all become more Right-wing as well, they would just conform to whatever the values of society were.

 

Whereas like what I called bio-Leftists or spiteful Leftists, I think they would still basically have Leftist proclivities even in a more Right-wing society.

 

So, yeah, I think the status seeking Leftists, I think we should have more compassion towards them. It’s not necessarily a bad thing that some people are conformist. If you have a society that has good leadership, it’s actually a good thing. It holds together society, makes it more stable. They are kind of the glue that holds together the social fabric and they just need better leadership. It’s not their fault that they have terrible leadership. They just don’t have much agency.

 

So whatever the leadership is, that’s what you’re going to get out of them. And it is what it is.

 

Blair Cottrell: Sounds like a supervillain, doesn’t it? Bio-Super-Saiyan Leftists. That’s what we’ve got to deal with these days, guys, bio-Leftists!

 

But did you want to segue into the story that you already mentioned, the story in England of little girls who I think were at a Taylor Swift themed dance party or something. They were set upon by a knife wielding African immigrant.

 

But I think he was a first generation or maybe second generation immigrants. I think he may have been born in England, but I’m not sure of all the details. What do you know, about that?

 

Joel Davis: So I believe the killer was a 17 year old of Rwandan descent and the media was like:

 

“Oh, he was born in Cardiff!”

 

Which is in Wales, and his family moved to, I think, Southport, I think is what it’s called, which is right near Liverpool in the northwest of England. Near the top of Wales on the Western coastline. Oh, when he was a six year old boy with his, with his family.

 

But you know, don’t neglect to mention that. And then like later it’s like:

 

“Oh, and his family were from Rwanda.”

 

Or something:

 

“But he’s British, you know! We’ve got these probably these Welsh baby killers out there we’ve got to watch out for!”

 

There was an image that I saw on Twitter of the guy, and he just looks like this, like, demonic. Like, he’s just black as fuck! And he had this, like, demonic expression on his face. They said he was 17. He looks like 35, horrifying, kind of dead look in his eyes!

 

So, yeah, anyway, so it was a Rwandan. I don’t think he would necessarily have probably have been a Muslim, because there was some speculation like, is this an Islamic, you know, terrorist attack? I mean, it’s possible. Most Rwandans, I don’t think, are Muslim. I think most of them are Christians or whatever weird variant of maybe they nominally Christian, but they have some, like, weird voodoo religion or something. But, it’s possible that he could have converted to Islam or that he’s from a minority of Islamic people that are Rwandans. I don’t know. But I think that’s beside the point.

 

I mean, the point is that he’s black! The point is that Rwandans shouldn’t fucking be in Britain! Or any Africans, for that matter! And that Africans are savage, and they’re way more predisposed to psychotic behaviour. And the media response was, rather than sympathizing with the victims, that we have these little girls stabbed to death for literally no reason.

 

Instead, the media focus is covering up the race of the murderer and then demonizing and attacking the protesters, who I think the reason why the riots initially broke out was they got together for a vigil. People of that community, they got together for a vigil for these girls that died.

 

And then a Islamic individual who wasn’t African, he looked like he was somewhere from the subcontinent in the images I saw, was arrested wearing a balaclava, holding a machete, by police. And when the people got wind of this, they reacted quite forcefully, saying:

 

“You know, so there was basically a Muslim coming to come and hack us for holding a vigil for dead children?”

 

And they lost it. Justifiably. And a bit of a riot ended up breaking out of sorts in the area, and protests and so on seem to be kind of erupting around the area now and maybe even in other parts of Britain from some of the things I’ve seen online.

 

So, which is good. It’s good to see a reaction, because when this thing happens, horrible things have happened where young people have been killed senselessly by hese racial aliens, these savages from Africa or the Middle East and there’s no reaction. They’ll have some big vigil in the middle of the city where they all sing Kumbaya and talk about how:

 

“We can’t blame this on race or something. We all have to come together!”

 

And that kind of bullshit! And that’s all that happens. It’s good to see a proper reaction. It’s good to see that the English people have a little bit of dignity left in them and righteous anger. Because righteous anger, bridging on what I said before, that’s the force that’s going to fucking save us! We’re not going to be saved by optics at the end of the day, we’re going to be saved by willpower!

 

So I think it’s actually quite good to see such a strong reaction, and long may it continue. I don’t think it’s over. I think there’s still a lot going on.

 

[55:00]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: That being said, I think the optics of your last demonstration were pretty good. Everyone being in black, everyone being pretty fit, everyone being in, I suppose, what you could say, an organised structure. Everyone knew where to stand, knew when to speak, knew what to do.

 

And I think it kind of looks cool that there’s only one guy with the mask off. At least it creates that perspective of uniformity.

 

So the aesthetics, which is what I regard optics as, the aesthetics were good. And it never hurts to have good aesthetics. You’ll notice people who protest on the left, whether they’re communists or Marxists, they always lack aesthetics because they’re not very healthy people. They look like shit!

 

And if you look like shit, it’s really hard to sell something to people because you’re like a physical example of what a philosophy is producing in a person, right?

 

So if your philosophy is good, you’re gonna look good. If you believe it well enough, and if you actually adhere to it. If your philosophy is bad, false, you’re gonna look like shit eventually, the longer you adhere to it. So a philosophy produces a physical expression relative to the quality of the philosophy itself.

 

And so I think for that reason, aesthetics will always be on our side, which is good.

 

Joel Davis: Aesthetics, I guess, like the word optics, it depends what you mean. Obviously you want to look good, you want to look cool.

 

But I guess what I meant to say is often optics is used as “don’t scare the hoes”. You know, don’t come across as too aggressive or too forceful. Tone it down. Make your message something that the majority of people would agree with. But the problem is that the majority of people are fucking pussies! And the majority of people have the wrong sensibilities.

 

So I don’t want to put a message forward that the majority of people would agree with, because that message isn’t good enough. I want to put forward a message that majority will don’t agree with, not yet. And they need to be challenged with. And, yeah, we’ve got to make it look cool.

 

So in that sense, you need good optics. You always got to look cool.

 

But it’s about showing strength. It’s about showing conviction.

 

And that’s what I love to see about what’s coming out of England at the moment is a lot of people disavowed the violence, so to speak. I’m not gonna do that. I could probably don’t want to say too much, but it’s good to see that these people just don’t give a fuck that they’re angry and that they’re expressing a true emotion. And we saw just in a week or two ago in, there was a massive riot in northern England. And I can’t remember which city it was. I think it was in Leeds. And some gypsy kid was, … Child Services came in to take a gypsy kid custody away from its parents. I don’t really know what the story was about, why they were trying to take custody off the gypsy parents. You know, maybe the gypsy parents were abusing the kid, I don’t know.

 

But then the gypsy community started rioting. And then a bunch of local Muslims just started joining in on the rioting as well, because why not? They just, like rioting. And the city descended into total anarchy. And the police basically had no control of the situation, and it lasted for days. And they had to just wait for them to stop rioting, and they got the kid back.

 

And so the message that that sent was like:

 

“Well, in England, like if you try to, like, peacefully and politically organise, you know, particularly as White people, you won’t get shit! But if you go and kick up a stink, then you can get something.”

 

So they basically said riot, and the police have shown weakness and a lack of capacity to restore order. Multiple instances in England. And the police have a reputation there for basically solving no crimes, being totally just weak and inept at protecting communities from violence, from all the rape and the gang violence and other forms of racially motivated hate crimes and so on.

 

But they’ll go knock on your door, if you make a racist tweet or something, Britain’s fucked! Particularly England, in the way that it’s policed. So no one should have any respect for the police in Britain because they don’t actually do their job. They don’t actually protect the people. They uphold an anti-White anarcho-tyranny.

 

And so White people ultimately are going to have to start organising to take care of their own fucking communities because the state is no longer actually functioning in a way that protects them. That’s what happens when you don’t protect people, when you invite in all these violent people where you give them soft sentences.

 

There’s been child rapists in Britain that have been sentenced to paltry sentences and, like, let out early and stuff because of their:

 

“Oh, they’re struggling with cultural assimilation or and where they come from, they don’t have laws against rape. How are they supposed to know they weren’t supposed to rape ten year olds or something!”

 

I mean, it’s insane the kinds of things that happens.

 

Meanwhile, they put Sam Melia in jail for two years for distributing stickers. They put other nationalist activists in jail for even longer sentences than that for handing out literature or giving speeches that were too edgy or something. Britain is unbelievably fucked! It’s way worse than Australia with this kind of thing. It’s quite bad here, as we were talking about earlier.

 

So this idea that the English people are supposed to just get your local representative elected and just peacefully organise, even though they tried to do that, they tried to build the nationalist party, the BNP. The intelligence services of Britain actively sabotaged and destroyed it. They had the National Action guys, various other nationalist groups that were prescribed, listed as terrorists, mass jailed. So many nationalist activists have had to flee the country or if they have, to avoid being locked up. The nationalist movement in Britain has been utterly attacked for decades by the State.

 

[1:01:05]

 

Anyone who tries to organise to defend, basically the idea that English girls shouldn’t be mass raped by Pakistanis or that they should have some modicum of justice for White victims of senseless and egregious acts of violence, in some cases murder, get called racist and marginalised from society and fired from their jobs. And so on. The list goes on.

 

So what the fuck are they supposed to do? All their other options have been exhausted.

 

So there’s absolutely no moral reason whatsoever that you can conjure up that’s good to justify not supporting almost anything that they do at this point, because their anger is totally justified. Their country is being fucking stolen from them, and they’re basically being forced to be subjected to third world conditions.

 

And basically the entire government is designed around preventing them from organising to protect themselves while completely unleashing an anarchy, a brutal anarchy of these foreign invaders engaging in all kinds of egregious behaviour against them! Like, it’s fucking insane! So godspeed to them.

 

I hope that the protests get bigger and get more aggressive and more and more people get in the streets, and I hope it swells up into a fucking mess that the government doesn’t know how to deal with over there. I really do, because that’s what’s necessary probably, to, like, force the issue and to force a polarisation.

 

And I’ve seen a lot of more conservative types on social media from Britain saying:

 

“You know what? I don’t give a fuck anymore! I’m a racist! There, I said it!”

 

And this kind of rhetoric, you know, it does seem like it’s a very polarizing time in Britain at the moment with recent events and good! About fucking time!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I even saw Marcus Fallon, the Golden One, good friend of mine, posting about it saying that Sam Melia had a very reasonable, normal position and he was jailed for it. And until re-migration happens, White children will keep being murdered senselessly and unnecessarily. Probably true. I think the action that the government needs to be forced into taking is re-migration is sending these people back. And what’s it going to take for the government to actually get to that point? I don’t think they will do it. I think the government needs to be replaced in a fundamental way. Even the form of government needs to change, I think people know what I think. I don’t like the idea of democracy. The idea is fine, actually, but in practice, it ends up just being a seditious means. God, you can tell I’m tired. A seditious means for foreign control and, dare I say, a jewish influence to creep into your country and take over it from the inside.

 

And I suppose that’s why Netanyahu, at his recent speech to American Congress, hailed America as the “great citadel of democracy”. What that actually means is America is the “great citadel of jewish sympathizers” as a result of the jewish tentacles in all of the American institutions!

 

And I actually remarked about that specific speech on my Telegram because I was sickened by it! I couldn’t believe how Netanyahu was actually introduced by the Speaker of the House. Speaker of the House said:

 

“Ladies and gentlemen, I have the great honour of presenting to you his excellency Benjamin Netanyahu, prime minister of Israel.”

 

And I’m thinking, his “fucking excellency”, he’s just a prime minister. He’s not Palpatine. And then before Netanyahu even said anything, there was this, like, sickening, drawn out applause that just would not stop! And it was reminiscent, eerily reminiscent of a Stalin speech, footage that I’ve seen of a Stalin speech, where Stalin is just enduring this painfully long applause, and he almost becomes frustrated with it. And he has to put his hand up to tell people to stop clapping.

 

[1:05:02]

 

And I think at the time, everyone in the crowd was probably too scared to be the first one to stop clapping because later in the day they could be shot. And that seemed to be the same kind of vibe that was in American Congress that day. Everyone was trying to be the one who cheered Netanyahu on the most. And every time he paused or finished his sentence, the American Congressman and Congresswomen, of which there’s far too many, they all took the opportunity to do another standing ovation and applaud the guy even more, even though he wasn’t really saying anything significant. It was all just very simplistic, us versus them propaganda like wartime dynamic of:

 

“We are the civilised ones and the enemy are barbarians! We are for life, the enemy is for death! We are the good guys, the enemy is the bad guy. Down with him. Let’s destroy him!”

 

And everyone was just clapping and, like, hysterically cheering this guy. And I’m thinking:

 

“This is weird! It’s like watching some alternative universe of absolute jewish worship. It’s the weirdest shit I’ve seen in a while.”

 

And that’s what I wrote almost word for word on Telegram after watching it. So what’s going on over there in America, guys? It looks like your entire Congress is just kissing Israeli boots. How did that happen? [chuckling] I knew that jewish influence was significant in the West and specifically in America, but I didn’t know it was that bad! That was really eye opening to see Netanyahu treated like a God Emperor by all of American Congress. Did you see that, Joel?

 

What are your thoughts about that?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, it wasn’t all of American Congress, because I think about 100 Democrats refused to attend. And one Republican, Thomas Massey, who’s the only elected Republican in the Congress who doesn’t have an AIPAC guy, he said that himself. AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee] is a like the number one institution that in American politics that advocates for Israeli interests and is a massive donor to political campaigns. And Thomas Massey was interviewed by Tucker Carlson recently and said:

 

“You know, every other Republican has an AIPAC guy. They all have an individual AIPAC guy who tells them, ‘well, this is kind of what Israel wants, is what the jews want, and this is what we wouldn’t be so happy with. And we’d love to help you out in your next campaign. So you keep your AIPAC guy happy, then we fund you. If you piss off your AIPAC guy, maybe we fund your opponent’.”

 

And that’s kind of how it works. And obviously, the jews have massive influence over the media. You go against the jews, you’re pissing off people that aren’t just people that you’re relying upon for campaign financing, but media coverage. They have institutional influence within the Republican Party.

 

So that is how they divide up many of the other forms of campaign financing and support and so on.

 

So in order to be a professional politician in the United States, you kind of have to suck jew dick! It’s almost impossible to function in American politics without doing. So very few people have managed to do it, but it’s quite rare. Thomas Massey is admirable because he is one of them, and he openly criticises Israeli influence, and it’s notable because he’s on the Right.

 

But obviously, there’s a lot more Leftist or Democrat politicians that are quite sympathetic to Palestine who are more like, socialist in their leanings and therefore are anti-zionist because they see zionism as a form of White supremacy or something.

 

Blair Cottrell: There was an effective method for engaging in politics without being subservient to either jewish or some other special interest group for funding. And that was to speak directly to the people and just use social media, which is what I was doing in 2015 and, 20016 before I was censored. But I suppose now aggressive censorship has made that a lot more difficult.

 

So it’s like maybe these, … But people in the political class rarely go for that angle anyway.

 

I mean, they believe in speaking in the upper echelons of the ivory towers and never getting their hands dirty by speaking directly to the public on the streets of America, Canada, Australia, whatever Western country we’re talking about.

 

And so that separation between working class and political class, I think, would need to be broken in order to effectively represent the people of a nation and become popular within the nation without having to be subservient to campaign funds and stuff like that, because they’re going to fund you, they’re going to keep throwing support and money your way as long as they know you’re there and they like what you’re saying. But I suppose having control over social media and also threatening people with legal action and anti-fascist action, anyone who dares speak in public, directly to the people, that’s what keeps these campaign funders and lobbyists in control of politics.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So the only way that the Australian Labor Party was able to operate back when it defended the White Australia Policy, or the only way in which the NSDAP [National Socialist German Workers’ Party-NationalSozialistische Deutsche ArbeiterPartei] was able to operate in Germany, was because they both had massive rank and file working class members who paid dues.

 

And so they were able to basically fund themselves on the backs of the people as opposed to having to go to elite donors.

 

Whereas in American politics, nothing like that exists.

 

If you look at the biggest campaign financing lists, it’s dominated by jews, as you would expect. Just look at who Trump’s biggest donors are in this current election cycle. There are all these jewish Zionists throwing hundreds of millions of dollars, at him, and this is customary in American politics. There was a study done I had posted about on Telegram, …

 

[1:10:47]

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel, I was under the impression that Trump didn’t need money from anyone. Or does he?

 

Joel Davis: Well, that’s false. [chuckling] No, he’s raised hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars, so he clearly needs it.

 

But anyway, there has been a study that has been done on opinion polls relative to whether a law passes or doesn’t pass the American Congress. And what was found that statistically, there’s absolutely zero relationship between how popular or unpopular a law is and its chances of passing.

 

But then if you look at the amount of campaign financing and lobbying, how many dollars are behind a particular law being passed, then you have almost like a perfect correlation between dollars into laws.

 

And so it shows that the American political system is an oligarchy that’s larping [Live Action Role Playing] as a democracy, because people get to vote, but your vote is conditioned by who has enough money to actually put together a campaign and who controls the media and so on. So it’s a vote within a very conditioned environment, conditioned by money.

 

The only way that which you could actually have the assertion of the popular Democratic will would be if the people got their money together independently of these elite groups. And you know, okay, no one of us can compete with these millionaires, but if a million of us chip in, then we can compete with the millionaires or whatever, right? That’s the principle. And that’s basically what I said, the NSDAP and the Australian Labor Party, when it was actually pro-White Australia, did. In the Australian Labor Party since it was through the unions, unions obviously basically funded by the workers.

 

So anyway, the point is that you can’t really compete unless you can compete financially. And that doesn’t exist in America.

 

And that’s another big reason why mass immigration is such a weapon against the political power of the people.

 

Because if you can basically create diversity within the people, you undermine their principles of kind of loyalty to one another and so on. And solidarity.

 

And so the ability to then organise the people into not just voters, getting someone to vote, it’s not that hard. I mean, it’s just tick a box. But to organise them into donors, into a membership that’s a completely different story.

 

But, yeah, like, yeah, America, the American political system, obviously it’s completely owned by jews. But I, the reason why I brought up that there was 100 Democrats that weren’t there was because they filled all the seats with just like random, I don’t know who, like actors. So they were probably all like clapping like seals the whole time, because they were just put there to clap for Netanyahu, like seals.

 

And so that increased the kind of sycophantic quality of it. It created this impression that all of Congress is all behind Netanyahu, but it’s because over 100 of them didn’t show up.

 

And in addition to that, I’m sure that there was a lot of eyes on all these Senators. And if anyone was seen to not be clapping hard enough, then maybe AIPAC, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I definitely, definitely got that impression. But it seemed really contrived. Like if they were trying to make it seem like there’s a great deal of support in the room for Netanyahu, they went a step too far and it just seemed contrived. It was weird to watch. Creepy, even! That was the impression that I got as a fairly normal person. I consider myself a normal person. I don’t know what the audience thinks, but I think dabble in the realms of normal. And it was weird! It was like a weird alternative reality I was watching there.

 

But I’m not really that familiar with American politics, so I can’t comment much further. I just I just know that seeing how much influenced Netanyahu and the jewish community, Israel, has over America in that particular speech, … I don’t know if that is actually reflective of the influence or not. What do you think? Is the influence Israel has over American politicians that bad? Or is it not that bad?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, obviously they completely. I mean, it’s called ZOG for a reason! Zionist Occupied Government. I mean, obviously.

 

I mean, the Iraq war made no sense. It was not in America from the standpoint of American strategic interest. It was entirely conjured up for the benefit of Israel by, through Israeli infiltration of the American government.

 

Blair Cottrell: And it’s concerning too, because I’ve spent more than a decade studying the jewish people, their history and their nature. And they’ll use nukes, they’ll use gas, incendiary bombs. They don’t give a fuck! They think they’re the master race and everyone else is scum! They actually are raised to believe that’s what their religion teaches. And the speech that Netanyahu was giving was dehumanizing anyone who stands against Israel as barbarian terrorists who need to be destroyed. Essentially, that’s what he was saying. And these aren’t just empty words, the things that jews are capable of I won’t even get into. Its just a concerning trend! [chuckling] I’ll leave it at that.

 

I’m reading a book right now, though, a book I want to recommend to people.

 

I’m just going to segue into this subject quickly. It’s a book by a former soldier, social scientist, and I believe he’s providing or playing some sort of advisory role in America to American military and even social life for politics. His name is David Kilcullen. He wrote a book called The Dragons and the Snakes: How the Rest Learnt to Fight the West. And he coined this term, which I think is something we should spend a little bit more time trying to understand. We already understand it to some degree, but the way it’s described by Kilcullen is interesting. It’s “Liminal Warfare”. And according to David Kilcullen, the word “liminal” comes from the Latin term “threshold”. So you might call it a “threshold of warfare”. His term, “liminal warfare”, or a threat, a warfare that is below the threshold of what the West considers warfare. Because unfortunately, up until rather recently, and probably still for a lot of people in the West, we see that the concept of warfare, in too much of a black and white perspective, it’s understood that warfare means land, air and sea, military superiority or combat to some degree. Tanks, boats, guns, planes.

 

 

But obviously, warfare has many different expressions. Sometimes when you’re watching something on television and there’s messages in the programme that’s going to have an effect on the children in the room, that might make them a little bit confused as to what gender they are or confused about what was formerly understood as easy to understand, like their position in the family, whatever it may be, that can be a form of warfare. And we understand that as “psychological warfare”.

 

And I think liminal warfare is very similar to psychological warfare, but it’s got a couple of important differences which are explained by Kilcullen in his book, which I’m still reading now. So I’m still developing my understanding of it. I won’t embarrass myself by trying to explain something that I probably don’t fully understand yet.

 

But a couple of the examples he gives as to what separates liminal warfare from psychological warfare are non-Western states have been engaged in liminal warfare against the West for quite some time, and that’s how they’ve been gaining ground on a global scale. They know they can’t go up against the American military directly, especially after how the American military steamrolled over Saddam and humiliated his forces so quickly. And that was kind of a demonstration of American military power at the time.

 

Even China didn’t want to mess with America, still doesn’t want to mess with the American army. But there’s certain other aspects of warfare they’re constantly engaged in.

 

And he gives an example of Russia, but like the books written four or five years ago, so its kind of behind the times. Before Russia, quote, unquote, “invaded Ukraine”, they were kicking up a stinking Crimea at the time, I think the Russians.

 

And basically there’s a few stages of liminal warfare which I think are of interest to us and could even be better incorporated into some of our activism and politics. The first stage is you make aggressive action for a specific purpose, but at the same time, you have to kick up smoke and dust to confuse what you’re doing, to obfuscate the purpose of what you’re doing and make it look like something that it’s not.

 

So, for example, if you’re trying to host a protest for the purpose of purposes of agitation and recruitment, you need to make it look like that’s not what you’re doing, you’re actually just trying to protest peacefully and freely, as is your right as an Australian citizen. Stuff like that is kind of or would be a very small example of what resides within the realm of liminal warfare.

 

And you might say:

 

“Well, this is all very obvious.”

 

And some of it is obvious. Like I said, some of its very relative to psychological warfare. Like influence that’s designed to turn your youth against you, turn men against women, turn families against each other and atomize the community. And it is very similar to that. And someone in the comments is mentioning Yuri Bezmanov. I’m very familiar with Bezmanov. I’ve listened to his lecture a lot. When I was young, before I even got into politics, I used to play video games, and rather than listen to music, I would listen to Bezmanov’s lecture over and over again just to make sure the message really sunk in.

 

But like I said, liminal warfare, or that is warfare that’s below the threshold of what’s understood as warfare, is going to be important for us not only to understand, but to incorporate in the future, I think. Even just in the form of like, active protesting.

 

Another example he gave was getting in and out before anyone actually has the opportunity to flag you for any action. So you get in and out of an area before anyone even understands who was there or what they were really doing.

 

So that’s another way you can incorporate it. But I’ll go through it more once I’ve understood it better. I just wanted to throw it out there because the guy seems to be a really clear thinker, and it’s difficult to find people like that in the modern day with people like Drew Pavlou running around and all the other crazy cats trying to be influencers these days. There’s just so much convoluted information out there.

 

But this guy is for me, and this is saying something because I don’t read authors very often, and I don’t appreciate authors very often. David Kilcullin seems to be a pretty clear thinker, so I’d like to recommend his book for that reason.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I actually haven’t read that book. You were talking about it last night a little bit. It does sound quite interesting. But that concept of liminal warfare is already basically, I think, a principle that we’re already applying where the idea is let’s figure out basically the maximum amount of offensive that we can get away with without overstepping the line and getting thrown in prison, basically. And let’s try and apply pressure there, because one of the largest problems, and this builds into what I was saying before, is a kind of learnt helplessness.

 

A lot of people are so afraid, a lot of people are so afraid of associating with me or with you because they’re worried that the feds are going to start, look, be watching them or like:

 

“Oh, what could happen? I could lose my job!”

 

And a lot of people live in a perpetual state of fear. And they constantly like:

 

“Well, don’t do that. This bad thing could happen.”

 

And people are always warning me:

 

“Joel, this could happen. That could happen. Don’t do this, don’t do that, don’t do this!”

 

And they have this kind of paralysis because we do live in a society which is quite hostile. So I can understand why people would develop that mentality.

 

But ultimately you can’t allow that mentality to fester because that mentality will keep you from ever actually doing anything! At a certain point, you have to be wise. You have to also not go too far, and get yourself taken out. So that’s the idea of that liminal warfare concept, right, is to just find that kind of sweet spot.

 

And that’s what I try to do in everything that I do. The maximum amount of boundary pushing I can get away with without just overstepping the mark. And it’s difficult because sometimes you can overstep.

 

But yeah, I think that’s what’s necessary. I don’t like the overly cautious approach that other people take. It doesn’t, it makes me feel, it offends my kind of sensibilities. My sensibilities are I want to basically extract the maximum amount of ground as I can from the enemy with the way I live my life. Every single piece of ground I can take, I want to take it! And be constantly on the lookout to take more.

 

I also want to say, I was talking to a few friends in English nationalism.

 

And basically what they’re saying is that they’re organising, they’re organising protests all over the country, I think. And they’re looking to kind of build upon the anger right now to push further.

 

And I’m going to make a prediction. I think a lot of these protests are going to become violent. And I’m not going to disavow or vow, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Which protests exactly you’re referring to?

 

Joel Davis: There’ll be protests in England. There’s going to be, they’re getting organised at a grassroots level in these local communities, and nationalists are pushing them.

 

Blair Cottrell: But man, the hell, like, …

 

Joel Davis: I would advise anyone going to these things to put a face coverings, just like anything to protect yourself, you know, some of the boys in our organisation have hats that have like a hard, kind of a hard brim so that like, if you get a blow to the head, it can protect the head from damage because there was incidents wherever Antifa were throwing, like cans of tomatoes and stuff at people. You cop one of those in the head, you know, that’s not too nice.

 

So I would say protective gear. I would be advising people to protect your gear, protect your identity. It could turn pretty, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You need to really, you need to be careful of those five foot one British cops with their batons, … [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: They got dogs. They might use tear gas. I don’t know what they’re going to use. I don’t know exactly what is customary for British police to use in these kinds of situations.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you see that footage? There was viral footage that went around of some, I think they were actually English police officers arresting a couple of what seemed to be Muslim characters at a train station, really dropping the knee into him. Did you see that footage? I don’t know what that was in relation to. I heard a girl, a female police officer was attacked, ….

 

And so the boys rolled in.

 

It actually got me thinking, maybe it’s not so bad to have one female cop in sort of like a little group or unit of cops, because then when she gets violently attacked by some of our, you know, alternative ethnic cousins, then it sort of throws the rest of the male police officers into an aggressive hysteria they otherwise wouldn’t be able to get into without seeing a member, a female member of their clan injured like that what I’m saying is the female police officer could be used as kind of like a sacrificial tool to anger all the male police officers and make them go even harder. That’s what seemed to happen at that train station situation. Did you see that footage, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: I didn’t see that footage. I saw another bit of footage where there was some dude arguing with the cop, and then a copy smacked him in the legs with his baton. And then some other guy came out from the crowd and started telling the cops off, saying:

 

“You know, what are you doing? That was such an unnecessary escalation.”

 

And then one of the cops set one of their attack dogs on him, and the dog just latched on and just bit him! And then someone came in to try and, like, get the dog off him, and the police attacked him for grabbing the police dog. So, I mean, it just seems like a total shit show!

 

Which is why I said, if you’re gonna go to any of these things, expect things to get hairy, expect things to get violent, and prepare yourself for that eventuality. It’s better to be prepared and not need to be prepared then to show up, you know, shorts and a T-shirt and you cop a brick to the head or something. So be safe out there!

 

But at the same time. There’s never been a better time, I think, to get in the streets then right now if you’re in England. So godspeed to all the patriots. And I saw some good images. I posted one on Twitter of this guy throwing a big Roman and all these guys up above the crowd. If, I don’t know if someone hoisted him up and all these guys throwing Romans around him in this crowd with like police surrounding them and so on, it does seem like the energy is the Vrul is rising in the Anglo Saxon! They are learning to hate!

 

So it’s a beautiful thing to see! It would be interesting to see how things unfold. If the energy dissipates or if momentum can somehow build.

 

[1:27:56]

 

 

And I think I just hope that nationalists project, you know, mass deportations or re-migration, if you prefer that term. I don’t like re-migration as much for this kind of thing because I think re-migration gives off the idea of like, “government programs to help immigrants resettle back in their homelands”, where “mass deportations” is just like, get them the fuck out! It’s more forceful. So I like that kind of rhetoric. But I understand if you’re trying to have a political party, re-migration is better to like present to voters as like a kind of sensible policy.

 

But I think for street activism, I think “mass deportations” goes harder, but it depends what you want to do. But that needs to be injected into this. That needs to be injected into the consciousness of the English people, that there is no solution to what is happening other than deportations.

 

Blair Cottrell: We can’t just hope for momentum to build. I mean, what does that mean? Err, let’s, maybe momentum will build. These people will just be angry. They’ll punch on with cops. Like, the state will just use increasingly aggressive measures, and then everyone will get sick of it and go home, because they remember that:

 

“Oh, shit! I’ve got a job, I’ve got a mortgage, I’ve got a car to pay off!”

 

And then it all just dies in the arse within a few days. So there needs to be like a concerted effort to organise a long term strategy out of incidents like this, rather than just like being like:

 

“Oh, well, let’s build momentum!”

 

Momentum doesn’t build on its own. It doesn’t build organically within the working class, within the peasantry, you might say. These people need consistent organisation! They need to be active members, and they need to be organised for long term political agitation.

 

And I suppose this is a good opportunity for some of the Right-wing groups in England to really get out there and make sure they’re absorbing as many people as possible who are hitting the streets and attending these protests. Absorb these people into your organisations and make use of them. Absorb them into active groups where they can then be put to long term use, rather than just letting this kind of fire burn down.

 

That’s what happens over and over again! In Australia, I’ve noticed there’s like an aggressive response from the people against some government program, whether it’s immigration policy or lockdowns, vaccine mandates.

 

But it’s not really capitalised on by any organisation. And that’s not really to throw dirt on anyone. I was probably in a position, for example, where I could have capitalised on the anti-lockdown protests and really contributed to them in a big way, or even helped absorb people from those protests into more long term political strategies. But I was being harassed by the police at the time. Several times before some of those lockdown protests, the police called me and said:

 

“If you’re at the protest, if you’re seen there, we’ve been instructed to arrest you on site. Just letting you know.”

 

So there was a strong effort made by the government to actually prevent any long term organisation or capitalisation of these events by anyone who had the willpower or had the capacity for understanding to actually do it. And I think that’s probably happening in England, too.

 

But there’s got to be ways around that, and there’s got to be risk, sort of necessary risk to take. I just don’t want to see this die down. I want to see as many people as possible going to work and absorbing as many people as possible into active organisations, nationalizing people, not necessarily keeping the fire alive, because the fire is naturally going to simmer down on its own, because people have lives to go back to. And that needs to be taken into consideration I think.

 

I mean, it’s easy to just throw fuel on a fire that’s burning in the moment, but you have to understand that fire is eventually going to burn low. And when it does, what you’re left with is the resource that you’ve actually gained at the end of the day.

 

Joel Davis: That’s a good point to make. I think there’s a lot to be said, though, for the English people showing a response, just showing an angry response rather than a cucked response, as what has basically unfolded over other recent tragedies. Because that means the next time this happens, as a precedent of:

 

“What we do in response to this, is we get angry! And we get angrier and angrier each time!”

 

As opposed to sit on our hands and talk about how:

 

“We’re all one people and no race is to blame for this, don’t look back in anger.”

 

That kind of shit!

 

So I think that’s why I do like to see the fuel on the fire in this instance, because there just needs to be a little bit of balls being grown and a reassertion of some masculine energy!

 

But yeah, I 100% agree with what you’re saying. And my understanding, I don’t want to name any names, but talking to people I know in England, I haven’t actually spoken to Mark Collett about this, so this doesn’t apply to him, by the way. I’m not saying it’s, but I’m sure I would almost guarantee that there’s got to be some kind of involvement in this kind of thing from Patriotic Alternative people because, you know, they’re like a big faction in the nationalist movement.

 

[1:32:57]

 

But yeah, my understanding is that basically all the nationalist organisations are super active and doing their best to co-ordinate things and to network and to recruit and everything.

 

So that’s obviously a really good thing to see. I think one problem maybe that they’re having is that there’s a lot of support in the public for the anti-Islam, Tommy Robinson [aka, Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon] type approach. And getting people to look at things racially rather than just in terms of anti-Islam is also another task for the nationalists to ideologically redirect things into a White nationalist direction.

 

So, I mean, I’m not in England. I only see what people are saying online. People are telling me online, but there seemed to be a lot of energy over there. So it’s a good thing to see. Because it seems a bit similar to what happened in Ireland. Like, in Ireland, you had a few big, high profile immigrants killing natives in brutal and egregious ways, and then you had these big riotous responses from the Irish people, and people said:

 

“Oh, well, what’s the point of that?”

 

But it did show a bit of fighting spirit, and it seems as though that’s actually translated somewhat into a little bit of organisation. And I’ve seen lots of stuff coming out of Ireland all the time where they’re successfully resisting refugee settlements. You know, how they try and, like, take, like, a hotel in a particular town and pack it full of immigrants and that kind of thing, or take public housing and pack it full of immigrants.

 

They’ve got quite good, it seems, in Ireland, at protesting against that and preventing that they do that in England as well. I remember particularly talking to Joe Marsh about pretty successful protests they had somewhere in Wales where they just basically camped out in front of this hotel and just prevented it from being filled with immigrants. And they won. It was successful.

 

So, you know, translating into those kinds of like regular actions where it isn’t just throwing a few bricks at cop cars and everyone goes home, but then it becomes something also productive.

 

But yeah, and I also saw that the Reform Party has been quite disappointing. I think Richard Tice, who is like the 2IC [Second in Charge] of the Reform Party, he was running it until Farage stepped back in just before the last election. He came out and condemned the violence and so on, which I thought was quite disappointing because, you know, Left-wing politicians don’t condemn the violence. We saw this in, we saw this in America and most particularly when Black Lives Matter were rioting and all the Democrats were like:

 

“Well the police are racist and we can understand these communities and their struggles and so on.”

 

You know, that’s the kind of rhetoric that you would expect from so-called Right-wing populists. They should be coming out and saying:

 

“Well obviously, you know, everyone should stay peaceful, but at the same time look at what has happened there you got to understand what these communities are going through and take their side, sympathize with them, rather than taking the side of the Leftist and the system against them.”

 

So that was, I thought, quite disappointing, but also to be expected.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is there anything else we want to touch on in relation to news, local news, international news? What else we got?

 

Joel Davis: Um, maybe there’s a funny thing we could touch on which is, you saw Friendly Geordie’s video on Drew Pavlou, right?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I did. Nipples protruding.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it was quite funny.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d never thought I’d watch a Friendly Geordie’s video and find it thoroughly entertaining. I usually find the guy kind of annoying.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s just got that Left leaning nature that just irritates me. But he’s actually been posting some based shit lately and it was genuine. Like, I watched it with my girlfriend and it was like we genuinely laughed about it.

 

So, yeah, Friendly Geordie. I don’t know what’s happening, man. I don’t know what kind of universe I’m living in, but Friendly Geordie’s is actually kind of enjoyable content at the moment.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. The video where he went, … The Israel lobby a month or two ago and it was pretty good.

 

And apparently his live shows are actually more based than his YouTube channel. Apparently, at his live shows, he’s actually steps over the line with racial remarks and anti-semitic remarks.

 

Now, I don’t think that Friendly Geordie’s is our guy. He’s very much a Leftist, and he’s a Labor Party shill, and his missus is Asian.

 

So, you know, any podcast with there’s that brown dude on his podcast. So he’s clearly not a White nationalist. But at the same time, he’s a man of a lot of influence. And it does seem as though he’s kind of occupying that kind of Joe Rogan kind of style of politics, where you kind of mix elements of the Right and the Left together. Like, you take some Left-wing social, economic policies, I should say, and you mix it with a kind of anti-woke, conservative, like, social attitude.

 

And that’s quite interesting, because usually those things aren’t coupled together. Well, that actually seems to appeal to the sensibilities of a lot of Australians. Because a lot of Australians are kind of soft core National Socialists. They like nationalism, patriotism, mixed with a Left-wing economic slant. That’s kind of what this White working class in this country have always been like, but just obviously a lot more radical than Friendly Geordie’s on issues of race.

 

But, yeah, I thought it was quite funny because in his taking the piss out of Drew Pavlou video, which I was surprised that he just made a whole video taking the piss out of Drew Pavlou, he kind of imitated his accent, and he put on this, like, really, like, exaggerated wog accent.

 

[1:38:52]

 

And then he kind of insinuated that he looks Middle Eastern and played a clip of Drew Pavlou speaking and put Al Qaeda style video overdub on it. And it was quite funny. So he kind of was basically racist. Like, he was mocking Drew Pavlou for not being White, basically, which I thought was funny.

 

And then he basically just called him gay and fat. Like, that was the video. It was pretty good. [chuckling] It was just basic insults! But it’s excellent! You know, that’s the kind of thing that we get under Drew’s skin. And the video was titled, I think, “Lolcow” or something. And it’s probably the perfect way to describe what Drew Pavlou is. He is basically just a lolcow*.

 

[* Lolcow, a portmanteau (A word formed by merging the sounds and meanings of two different words, as chortle, from chuckle and snort) of the acronym LOL and cow, is a derogatory slang term used to describe an individual who is deemed highly exploitable and therefore susceptible to trolling and flaming due to their display of gullible behaviour online. The term is also closely associated with the forum Kiwi Farms, which helped to popularise it throughout the 2010s and, 20020s.]

 

So yeah, I think I like this idea of Drew Pavlou just being this whipping boy of all of Australian politics. Like, I see even like the far-Left, like, Antifa types. Like, they shit on Drew Pavlou.

 

Blair Cottrell: Tell me, Joel, tell me, do you, do you think he’s genuinely being serious or is he trolling for me? It’s hard to tell if he is trolling. He’s doing a really good job acting like he’s being serious. Like, is this guy, …

 

Joel Davis: It’s a mixture of the two. He is seriously narcissistically deluded, but then also he just trolls for attention and the two things are quite mixed together. So it becomes this kind of convoluted mess of like, is he trolling right now or is he being serious? And he’s kind of masked all of his mental illness in this elaborate facade of bullshit! And it’s just quite hilarious to watch! Like, he actually, it actually is entertaining that he exists. So I’ll give him credit for that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Agreed. I’ve actually been checking whatever he’s doing, it’s working for the purposes of getting himself into the field of vision of anyone who’s anyone in Australian politics at least, because even I’m checking his ex-account just for cringe value lately, and just to kind of laugh at the comments. But I’m still clicking his account and that’s the point, right? I’m still traffic that’s now going through his account.

 

So maybe that’s the genius of Drew Pavlou. Maybe he’s just a content genius! I don’t know, [chuckling] but it’s hard for me to understand whether he’s for real or not, but whether he is, whether he isn’t, he’s definitely an entertaining character, and he’s managing to get. Didn’t you get the attention of Andrew Tate? Andrew Tate threatened to sue him or something.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s what he tries to do. He tries to get the attention of lots of people. That’s his whole modus operandi because he doesn’t actually have anything in himself.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s a very standard method for people who aren’t really significant, intelligent or special in any way and don’t really have much to offer. Their way of becoming significant is to just get people who are bigger and more impressive or established than them to attack them. And that, as a result, raises them up to a similar level as the people who are attacking them, at least publicly. It’s a very standard method people who aren’t talented use to try to get on the similar level of talented people.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But I like that he attacks us and me, because every time I talk, I interact with him on Twitter. I just ratio him and make him look like a like an idiot! And it just makes me look good by comparison.

 

So it’s just like low hanging fruit. Like, I might as well just go pick some Apples from the Drew Pavlou tree, like, every now and then, because it’s free Apples. Why not?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah. What else?

 

Joel Davis: Anyway, if you guys haven’t seen it, you can find the link on my Telegram, if you don’t use an iPhone.

 

And also download, if you have an Android phone, download Telegram directly from the Telegram website, not from the Google Play store. So that you can see now my channel, which has been A.

 

Banned, but also Tom Sewell’s channel and a few other channels that are A.

 

Banned. It’s really not that hard to download it straight from a Telegram website. Takes just a few seconds.

 

Sorry to the I-cucked [iPhone], though. It’s not an option for you, as far as I know, but I will make. I will make a new Telegram channel. I said that earlier, and I’m reiterating that, but for now, that’s what it is. But maybe we’ll go through a few Superchats. There’s actually one from Entropy, from The Gump. He sent $14.88. And he said:

 

“When will Joel Holder learn how to ban to workshop for Swedes?”

 

It’s quite funny!

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s that in reference to?

 

Joel Davis: I think I talked about how I didn’t think Scandinavians, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, yeah. Because Swedish people apparently don’t understand sarcasm. That’s what you told me.

 

Joel Davis: I didn’t say they don’t understand sarcasm. I said the way that we use it, they don’t really use it. Like, they don’t really appreciate it. I think they understand it, but they don’t appreciate it. Like, they just have a different appreciation.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay.

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, but anyway, banter isn’t just sarcasm. Banters complex. A complex thing, I think. Yeah. Only really, like, Anglo-Celtic people are true masters of the bance.

 

And then, you know, every other ethnic group, you know, is kind of trailing behind us in the art of banter, …

 

[1:44:20]

 

Blair Cottrell: I think banter is like some fundamental tool that you need in order to be a good comedian. I wonder how many Swedish comedians there are. I can’t think of any. And there’s plenty of comedians that come out of England and Ireland. I don’t know about northern Europe, though. They might be a little bit too serious. Maybe it’s true? I’ve never been to northern Europe, so I don’t know. Haven’t got personal experience. But what could be the essence? How would you describe banter? What is banter? Is it, I don’t know, teasing each other, picking on each other, but in a way that’s not aggressive or hostile, but just playful.

 

Joel Davis: The idea of banter is that you basically tease each other and then you see if the other person can just tease you back but maintain a lighthearted, jovial attitude, or if it actually starts to impact them and they start to feel personally affronted, and if they start getting offended and start defending themselves and lashing out and so on, and you can see that they have a weak mentality. Whereas if they just kind of fire it back but maintain a kind of detached, jovial aura that shows that they have a kind of mental stability. And that proves that you can kind of trust them to maintain mental stability in general!

 

And so it’s a way for men, in particular testability of all their other friends to see, like, is this guy a fucking bitch? Is he going to snap under pressure? Is he going to get, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a male shit tests! It’s a male shit test.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah

 

Blair Cottrell: And that’s why people who can’t take banter get bullied, because they deserve to get bullied. If you’re going to be so emotionally fragile that you’re going to take banter to heart, well, then you make yourself a target of bullying, don’t you? Right.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But I’m not saying, anyway, I don’t want to shit on Swedes. I can see the Swedes in the chat getting upset. I’m not, … I love Swedes! I was just responding to a Superchat. And I was just, … I think our banter is superior. It doesn’t mean I think all Swedes are like, retards. I don’t understand humour or anything like that you know, just, again, this is an example of learn to banter. You don’t have to take it so seriously.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m starting to see that arrogance could be the crux of the issue. One of the most prominent Swedes and a regular supporter of the chat said that:

 

“Actually, our humour is just more advanced than yours.”

 

Okay, [chuckling] that explains it! [chuckling] We’re just not smart enough to keep up with the superior master race Swedish humour!

 

Joel Davis: To be fair, you have to be really high IQ to understand Swedish humour or something. It’s like Rick and Morty.

 

Anyway, the whole, … [chuckling] No, but it’s an Anglo-Celtic thing. Like, this is how we are. Don’t be so anti-Anglo. Like, let us be ourselves. You know, it’s part of our our identity.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think anyone’s being anti-Anglo. I think this in itself, what we’re doing right now is banter to a degree.

 

We got another Superchat. $14 donation from Alt Cuperian. You know, consistent supporter of the channel. I’ve seen this name pop up a few times, so thank you very much, GM from US:

 

“What’s your thoughts on starting a non-profit for the purpose of White advocacy?”

 

I suppose he means not for profit organisation:

 

“Is that a waste of time? Is the only meaningful way to organise the active club strategy. So should we start?”

 

I don’t know. Personally, I think you should try whatever you think might work. I think maybe this has been tried and maybe it hasn’t in certain places. I’ve always felt in my core that setting up a religious type institution protected by freedom of religion law, specifically in Australia, that was actually more of an ethno-religious community. I really think that’s something that should be explored further. People agree with me, but then nothing is ever done about it.

 

So I might have to do that myself one day. I don’t know. But you won’t know until you try. That’s the point.

 

And I’m not against someone setting up a not for profit, you know, White advocacy organisation. You might go up against some sort of discriminatory accusations and you might find yourself in court, blah, blah, blah. But there’s precedents where other ethnic community organisations that are not for profit exists. And you could probably leverage the fact they exist to support or justify your own existence as a White advocacy group.

 

So I’m not against it. I don’t think it’s a waste of time. I think things like that, they all sort of contribute to putting pressure, not necessarily putting pressure on, but gaining ground against the system, which is fundamentally anti-White, which regards White people as devils, descendants of colonials who have to pay for perceived historical injustices. And we need to gain ground against that system in a thousand different ways, and in as many different ways as possible.

 

So definitely not against the idea.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think it would be a good thing to have a not for profit. I think the main functions that are necessary are things that can actually protect pro-White activists, like some kind of organisation that could network small businesses in order to provide jobs for pro-White activists, something that would be really good to set up. So that if you put yourself on the line to advocate for our people, that there’s actually like a pro-White economy, if you will, that can scoop you up and make it so that it’s still possible to pay your rent and put food on the table for your family and so on, to make it more viable to be a pro-White activist or other kinds of initiatives like that.

 

So I think that kind of thing is quite good. And certain things kind of like that already exist, but they are limited in their functionality.

 

So, yeah, obviously we should have basically every single idea anyone has ever had about:

 

“Should we have this or should we have that?”

 

My answer to it is basically:

 

“Yes! We should just have all of it!”

 

That’s what a successful political movement has, lots of different organisations, lots of different initiatives. There isn’t just one organisation that we need. You can’t completely transform society with one organisation.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, good answer. Tend to agree. Basically echoes what I said, I think.

 

And $5 from White Power, regular supporter and contributor. Thanks, mate. He said:

 

“Republic for Australia. I did a poll for it a while back and it was around 50-50. 50 for people with our views.”

 

Well, I don’t know, Joel, this is a question for you. I don’t even really understand what a Republic in Australia would mean.

 

Joel Davis: It would mean getting rid of the Monarchy.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, like that hasn’t happened already. I mean, look how much power the Monarchy has in Australia! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course. I think the I think that’s a good retort. That is something that’s not really worth focusing on. The issue is that getting rid of, … I’m not in principle, like:

 

“Oh, we have to hold onto the Monarchy.”

Because, as you say, it’s basically dead anyway. But the Monarchy is an institution that represents our heritage. It connects us to Britain, to the rest of our people, ethnically speaking.

 

And so that’s why the Left attack it. They attack it as a form of trying to attack our heritage, to attack the foundation of our nation, our identity.

 

And so I defend it upon that principle.

 

And I also whenever the Left, because the Left is the one that are pushing for a Republic, when they push for constitutional reforms, it isn’t just remove the Monarchy and leave everything else the same. What they did in the 1999 referendum was proposing a completely different kind of constitution.

 

If they put forward another constitution now, like, imagine if they’re not going to do it. I don’t think it’s on the cards for the immediate future, but, like, let’s say the Albanese government puts forward a Republic referendum. Imagine how cucked the Constitution that they would put forward would be. It would have all this, like, pro-abo shit in it and pro-multiculturalism and pro-gay stuff, and it would be horrible!

 

So they would package deal it with all of this other crap that we wouldn’t want in the Constitution.

 

If you had a Right-wing, like, a far-Right Republic, then I would be maybe interested, because maybe that the Constitution they’ll be putting forward would actually be better than the one that we currently have.

 

And so it’d be worth moving to a Republic, and it wouldn’t be done in an antagonistic way towards our identity, which is how the Left would attack the Monarchy. But they would just say:

 

“Well, the Monarchy no longer serves us, and it didn’t defend us, and we needed it to defend us, so we might as well do away with it.”

 

Then maybe I would listen. So it really depends.

 

But, you know what is likely in the current political system to come forward as any kind of Republican push would just be trash.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I think that’s why they’d want it. Just to kind of wipe the slate clean legally and make their own laws, do away with constitutional laws and rewrite it, maybe. I don’t know. But I tend to feel the Monarchy is just a cooler concept.

 

You know, maybe we could just re-establish a monarchy down here and create our own monarchy, name a new King. That’d be cool. I wish we could do something like that. I like the idea of power being more centralised, individualised, even of a single figure that’s actually responsible and can be held to account! Rather than this kind of like, majority rule grey area where no one’s even really sure who has power, and no one’s really responsible for anything because it’s the institution that’s at fault, not any individual.

 

I think that’s gay. I think that’s pathetic! I’m sick of it, actually! I’ve only ever lived in a system like that, and I’m just thoroughly repulsed by it. Repulsed enough to really support anything that concentrates power into an individual, single party, or a person, wholeheartedly. That’s what I want now. I’m sick of this majority ruled democracy bullshit, to be honest. But that’s the system.

 

Joel Davis: I would much prefer an absolute monarchy, with no Parliament. If we could restore the Stuart monarchy in Australia or something, and they were based and racist and so on. I like monarchy as a principle. I think monarchy actually is probably the most ideal form of government if it’s, like, an actual functional monarchy with power, but we’re just so far away from that. Like, our true Royal Family was basically betrayed and taken out, like, centuries ago.

 

Blair Cottrell: Let’s start a new one!

 

Joel Davis: The ones in place, are totally cucked and have no actual power.

 

Blair Cottrell: What made our true Royal Family the true Royal Family in the first place? Probably just brute force!

 

So let’s just start a new Royal Family. Maybe circumstances get dire enough for us to do that in the future. Might be able to take advantage of some sort of chaotic situation. If, like, there’s some sort of global reset and everything falls to shit for a while, maybe we’ll get the opportunity to re-establish a monarchy. That’ll be pretty cool!

 

[1:55:51]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think that would be great, but, I think a dictatorship is something that’s more likely than a monarchy.

 

So I would say we’d probably be working towards that [chuckling] first and foremost and any kind of likely progression.

 

But, yeah, I mean, functionally, obviously, democracy is retarded! It’s not real, but it’s an illusion that facilitates the rule of nefarious elements. So I have no loyalty to it whatsoever in principle. But that should be quite obvious. I mean you’re watching a show that is, it’s not like some centrist, like, conservative show.

 

Anyway, so there’s a few Superchats on Odysee. There’s one from GoyBoy 1488. He said:

 

“This has become one of my favourite shows despite being American. Thanks for the good work, lads.”

 

I appreciate that. Filled Soda said:

 

“Thanks for your content. I’m here in Belfast, Northern Ireland.”

 

He didn’t say Northern Ireland. He said:

 

“Northern Potato, Niggerland. And I’m incredibly angry at recent events. The murder of three little girls, at the sickening Leftist reaction. I recently found your show, but I’m happy to find a stream that doesn’t pull any punches. 1488.”

 

I appreciate the support, and yeah, obviously what happened was fucking disgusting! Uh, it makes my blood boil! To me, I feel such a strong connection to Britain that when things happen in Britain, it feels like it feels like it’s happening to my country.

 

Blair Cottrell: I feel the same. Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

I mean, that’s my ancestral homeland. Ninja 404 said:

 

“Good morning from Cucknada. Thanks for the stream. It’s the first one I’ve caught in full. Keep up the good work.”

 

Yeah. Shout out to our Canadian friends. I think the Diagolon guys who we’ve collaborated with before, Ferryman, being kind of their main kind of streamer organiser, and Jeremy Mackenzie, they’re doing, like, a tour at the moment through Canada. It seems like they have a lot of fun and putting on interesting events. So it isn’t as though there’s no one doing anything in Canadian politics. So Canadians kind of sell themselves short. But there’s plenty of Canadians in the movement. I’ve seen a lot of Canadians in the White nationalist movement online over the years. There seems to be quite a substantial amount of our guys up there, so no need to be so self depreciating.

 

Confederate Patriots said:

 

“How about them Brits in Southport? Whites all over are waking up and pushing back. Thanks for all you do. Dixie is ready!”

 

Yeah, based! I am a big supporter of the Confederacy, because obviously, the Confederacy was run by a Davis, my clan, and what else is there to say?

 

Yeah, I 100% agree that it’s good to see the English pushing back. It is interesting, as well, that they’re pushing back in Liverpool or near Liverpool, first of all, because Liverpool actually has a lot of Irish blood, a lot of Irish immigrants, historically. So there does seem to be a little bit of a correlation [chuckling] between Irish blood and rioting. You know, Australia has a lot of Irish blood here and maybe that gives us a little bit of an edge. Uh, maybe sometimes you need a little bit of that angry Gael to whip things up!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, man. Well, my mother is half Irish. Her maiden name was McGaughren. I’m not sure how it’s spelled. I think it was McGaughran. And her mother’s maiden name was Bradshaw. So she’s half Anglo, half Irish. And my dad’s got, like, a Norman name, like Cottrell. My last name comes from old Frankish Norman tribes. During the Norman conquest of England, it started to appear.

 

But my dad is cool, calm, practical. Like, you just never really get a reaction out of him. Like, very pragmatic, very German. And my mom is, my mother’s anger is like, I don’t want to throw dirt on my mother. I love my mother. And she was very maternal. She was a great mother. But, man, her anger, you’ve never seen anything like it. The fighting spirit of my mother, it’s frightening, man! My mother, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s where you get your ginger beard from, right?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah. Well, I get my Irish from my mother’s side, and often I often seem to be a bit of a, you know, combination of my mother and father in that regard. I have the ability to be pragmatic and to consider logistics, but then I also have this, like, difficult to understand, difficult to explain fire in my belly that I’ve inherited from my mother. But I’m kind of glad that I’ve got my father’s influence, because my mother can really lose her mind!

 

Like, my mother’s rage is just off the charts! And I don’t know if it comes from her Irish ancestry, but, yeah, the Irish definitely have that fire in their bellies, and I love to see it. I can resonate with it! Like, when I hear the Irish speak, when I see the Irish move, like, I feel connected to that. I understand it, you know what I mean? You know, when you see your own kin, it’s hard to explain, but I definitely feel a strong connection to the Irish, but also to the kind of German-Anglo elements as well, because I have that in my ancestry, too.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, obviously, I’m the same in my ancestry. I mean, it’s mostly English, but there’s some ancestors from all over the isles. And obviously, there’s the Anglo Saxon migrations and the Celtic migrations before that, and the Norman migrations from the rest of Europe. So, obviously, we’re all northwest Europeans were all very racially similar. We’re one big family, and English is a Germanic language, you know, for a reason. We worship the same gods as the Germans and the Scandinavians for a reason.

 

So, yeah, there’s a no, obviously, the Celts had a bit of a different religion, so there’s a little bit of a distinction there, but yeah, very racially similar. Very similar in temperament with only kind of slight ethnic differences. So I do feel a strong connection to basically all those northwest European countries in particular.

 

But yeah, I think that might be all the Superchats for this evening.

 

[2:02:32]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s been a good show. We had about 500 peak viewers on Rumble, which is pretty standard viewership. Really appreciate you guys for tuning in and staying with us.

 

We’ll be back next week.

 

Joel Davis: 90 something on Odysee, and, yeah, some on Cozy as well.

 

So, yeah, usually we get it all across the three platforms, 600 and something peak viewers on an average show.

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel and I going to a national weightlifting event soon, but that won’t interrupt our streaming schedule. We should still be able to stream next Thursday. And yeah, really excited to get into it next week. I hope you guys have a nice week and we’ll see you again next time.

 

Is there anything else you want to drop on the audience before we tune out? Joel?

 

Joel Davis: No, just thanks for watching White power and, yeah, I guess I’ll probably make a new Telegram over the next few days, so keep an eye out for that. Also this weekend I was going to do a stream with Thomas 777. I haven’t done anything with him for a while, so I was keen to catch up, get his thoughts on., … He’s an American White nationalist kind of Internet personality. He’s very well read, he’s been around a long time. He’s got a lot of wisdom.

 

So I always like streaming with him so that go up on all the chans, I think Australian time on Saturday. I think it might be Friday night American time. But I’ll just confirm that. I’ll put it out on social media. I’ll give you guys warning. And yeah, I want to do something with Jacob as well at some point in the next few days, so just keep an eye out. There’ll be a few streams going up between now the next Thursday night show. I will be on the road next Thursday night, but I think I’ll be able to set up and we’ll still be able to do the show as normal.

 

So yeah, but just watch out for social media and I’ll try and get a new Telegram set up for those of you that are Apple iCucks that now can’t access [chuckling] my Telegram channel because, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that me? I’m running the Apple. So I’m going to have to use alternative means to see your channel.

 

But before we go, I’m going to be dropping some new content out this weekend. Just training content. I might vlog a gym session, do some legs, show you guys what I do, just have a bit of banter and have a bit of fun with that. Like I said, I’ve taken a break from content recently. I haven’t really made much, but I’m going to get back into it. Work starting to slow down again, so I’ll have a bit more time and I’ll get a bit more fun stuff out there for us to engage with. But yeah, thanks for joining us, guys. I’ll see you next time.

 

[2:05:05]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 8/2/2024 = 432 )

@Alison-Chains
53 minutes ago
Id join you guys and march in the streets if i was in Australia.
i tried linking up with the NJEHA since they’re near my state.

1
0
VotingDoesntWork
1 hour ago(edited)
Russia DID invade Ukraine and is conducting a genocidal war targetting civilians as well, what’s so “quote on quote” about that mr. Blair?
1:18:45

1
1

@SammichLubber
2 hours ago
o/

1
0
Indo-European
3 hours ago
it may be hard to judge but the appearance of the protesters and the harshness of the message seem counter-productive. This sort of hardline NS rhetoric is a total turnoff for all but the initiiated and coming from masked men in black fatigues it seems to me to be playing into the enemy’s hands. Best wishes to all the brave men who are prepared to demonstrate and I hope that I’m wrong.

0
1
Hide replies

@Alison-Chains
48 minutes ago
screw the optics! we’re at war and innocent children are being killed by these niggers. white people have every right to be angry and taking to the streets. so far nothing else has worked. third world people only understand violence. the politicians don’t give a shit either so it’s time to send a message.

1
0

@Mr.Fox
4 hours ago
i dont like hersants voice. makes me cringe. bring back sewell.

1
2
Hide replies

@Moonman
1 hour ago
I think he’s done a great job. Very inspirational and persuasive.

1
0

@BMC1488
4 hours ago
\\\

1
0

@BMC1488
4 hours ago
Blood & Honour, Sieg Heil! o/

2
0
TheLastBoyScout
7 hours ago
how old is Blair

Hide replies
Lampshade Denier
5 hours ago
33-34

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
9 hours ago
Everything Electron sucks real hard.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
9 hours ago
Odysee’s desktop app is an Electron app (based on Chromium) and therefore it’s slow as hell sometimes.

1
0
Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
9 hours ago
Okay. Maybe I will take a look at it. But I still guarantee you that they will get in trouble eventually because of some new censorship law or whatever.

@Moonman
9 hours ago
o/

2
0
Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
Gonna be frost in VIC overnight, cover your veggies

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
It’s also why they are shifting away from cdn77.com and moving over to arweave

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
o/

Smokey
9 hours ago
Later, boys!

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago
nothing is stored on ldry………and i know this because im fiends with the top lbry guy…….

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Oh yeah they did that for legal reasons

1
0
Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
9 hours ago
Hail Australia!

1
0
Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@bodvar_biarkey
I need to sort it

1
0
StrongerTogether
9 hours ago
lol

@filled_soda
9 hours ago
Looking forward to the stream with Thomas

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
god i hate arguing with you… but again are you wrong… when odysee bought out lbry they took over the content storage…

@bodvar_biarkey
9 hours ago
Dawnie come to Rumble chat

@Moonman
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
ahh gotcha

@CampsLindburgh
9 hours ago
o/

@bodvar_biarkey
9 hours ago
Heil!

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
JoelBlairLove Love to all you Beautifuls MWAH

Ziohazard
9 hours ago
Thanks for the stream

@Ninja404
9 hours ago
WP O/

@sparkofspirit
9 hours ago
thanks guys o/

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
o/

@CampsLindburgh
9 hours ago
WP

Walther Mauser
9 hours ago
Thanks for the show \o

StrongerTogether
9 hours ago
WP

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@Moonman
It was the original storage front for video content, odysee was the user friendly front end they made for it

DOLO
9 hours ago
Cheers chaps o/

@WhiteStrike
9 hours ago
thanks for the stream lads o/

@Ninja404
9 hours ago

@Moonman
yeah, check the blockchain explorer, it should let you search for vids and files

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
If it really is an actual free speech platform, then I’m pretty sure that they will get in trouble eventually. I guarantee you.

Smokey
9 hours ago

@tropicanaNFT
I think that they got a lot of Irish, Scottish and French.

tropic
9 hours ago
canadians are very irish

@Moonman
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
I’m unfamiliar with lbry. lbry.com?

@Ninja404
9 hours ago
lol david

@david_smith
9 hours ago
I think I had that feeling when I had some of the Irish spirit

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
It’s Irish.

Smokey
9 hours ago

@Moonman
yeah it’s starting to make sense now. Blair has said that Australia contacted Facebook to ban him from Facebook.

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago

@HoldTheHeathenHammerHigh
vaughn live, the owner literally played the new zealnders greatest streamers video when it was shunned by ever other platform…….

StrongerTogether
9 hours ago
Italians too. The anger is unreal. Tempered by my Nordic stoicism

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
No they are currently using cdn77.com for their VOD services (check your network TCP’s right now as you watch the stream) they are switching away from this to the arweave platform.

@Moonman
9 hours ago

@Smokey
I suspect they were both Canadian

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
A few regions far away from Southport UK kicked off.

Smokey
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Yeah this is what I suspected. They’re doing a bit of ‘house cleaning.’

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
9 hours ago
I have my doubts.

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
nah cat man you are wrong… it was bought out by another platform and they are switching away from lbry who were the “free speech” side of things

Rebbe Schneerson
9 hours ago
GTV maybe the only option for our content creators at this point

Hide replies

@Alison-Chains
12 minutes ago
i can’t access gtv from my phone. its an android galaxy. i tried going in through the brave browser and still nothing

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
aerweave is a bit of a funny one.

@5PY_HUN73R
has had a play with the source code and already setup a website that uses it.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Can you really criticize Christianity on there? Or promote National socialism for example?

@Ninja404
9 hours ago
\\\

1
0
Bo Sinn
9 hours ago
I attended the terror tour o///

Enlightened Despot
9 hours ago
We’re here, just no political outlet. There is no political party right of far left

StrongerTogether
9 hours ago
o/ confederate

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago
vaughn live is the other one

Smokey
9 hours ago
Dissident was Canadian, right? Was Freddy Canadian, too?

@Ninja404
9 hours ago
o/

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago

@HoldTheHeathenHammerHigh
joshwho and fuck… i forget the other one… are truly free speech… which is why they dont get money or get advertised…..

@david_smith
9 hours ago

@Smokey
Probably Canadian government tap them on the shoulder for that ban

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
This is the announcement of the new ownership I’m aware of
https://x.com/OdyseeTeam/status/1780019630100320311

Smokey
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
Yeah, that would not surprise me. They get the ADL / SPLC telling them to take certain channels down.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
9 hours ago
A so called Free Speech platform will never really exist, because the current system simply won’t allow it. That’s just how it is.

Smokey
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Aha aha. I thought that I heard that there were new owners. At any rate, something is going on with the deletion of channels, etc.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@Smokey
I think the SPLC is on their ass
https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2023/11/06/digital-threat-report-odysee

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago
odysee themselves announced it

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
not only did odysee change ownership… but they are divorcing themselves from lbry and going to some other jew platform

Smokey
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
Ah, I thought that they had new owners with the new changes.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Yeah like bitchite draw us in to build up the platform and then kick us off.

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago
odysee was always the enemy sadly…

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@Smokey
Odysee did not change ownership
https://x.com/OdyseeTeam/status/1780019630100320311

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago

@Moonman
you can probably stil find freddy on lbry….which is why odysee is removing its self from lbry……..

Smokey
9 hours ago

@Moonman

@TheRebbeOfficial
Dissident and Freddy were good channels. Sad to see them gone. I was just getting into their stuff, too. Odysee changed ownership recently and is going through some changes.

3
0
Hide replies

@EverybodywakeUp
6 hours ago
I noticed Freddy had gone, his channel was great I’m sure he was from the Uk.

3
0
Show reply
Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
A New Nobilty

@Ninja404
9 hours ago
you still might be able to extract freddys stuff off of the lbry site before they take it down

@Moonman

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Yeah it happens, streams are long format a lot is always missed, people set it on and are doing something while it going, sometime even going to sleep. I did that to Maldric today.

StrongerTogether
9 hours ago
a republic if you can keep it (spoiler we didn’t)

Rebbe Schneerson
9 hours ago

@Moonman
Yeah, I’ve just been doing the same, with the same result. FFS

Enlightened Despot
9 hours ago
LOLcow was pretty good

@Ninja404
9 hours ago
kek, we are everywhere o/

@Moonman
9 hours ago

@TheRebbeOfficial
I had a pretty good look across a few other platforms, it appears Freddy was only on odysee

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago
i totally miss loads of what you say in your streams lol

Confederate patriot
9 hours ago
$5.00
how bout them Brits in Southport! Whites all over are waking up and pushing back. Thanks for all yall do. Dixie is ready!

@DanTheOracle
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
tbh anything after sundown here im only 1/2 listening to…. otherwise it fucks my sleep patterns

Rebbe Schneerson
9 hours ago

@Moonman
I hope to god they haven’t broke his resolve and he bounces back. I can imagine it been very disheartening after the amount of effort he obv put in

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
interesting re GV

jbabybakes
9 hours ago
the hardest part of non profits is getting a dissolution clause that the bureaucrats like. you can just copy another org’s though

@Moonman
9 hours ago

@TheRebbeOfficial
Absolutely. I’ve been racking my brain trying to find some stuff again.

@WhiteStrike
9 hours ago
CI is just like that, but retards can’t get past their tiny brains beyond “hur dur we wuz jewz”

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago
NZ has one already and the state and media fucks with them all the time. Gloriavale.
https://gloriavale.org.nz/

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
Agree with the auto religious. 100%

Rebbe Schneerson
10 hours ago

@Moonman
I’m gutted. I loved both of their content. Freddy was a fucking gold mine for content

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
I’ve always been a big fan of British humor. I love irony.

StrongerTogether
10 hours ago
NGH non governmental Hitlerism

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
$5.00
Good morning from cucknada, thanks for the stream, its the first one i have caught in full. Keep up the good work! o/ o/

DOLO
10 hours ago
I don’t think trying anything that is pro white is a waste of time.

@Moonman
10 hours ago

@TheRebbeOfficial
I’m really unimpressed about Freddy and dissidents content disappearing. it needs to be back up somewhere.

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
Be quick off the mark….or die

Rebbe Schneerson
10 hours ago

@DOLO
:rofl:

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
But you’re still correct to a certain degree. You really are.

DOLO
10 hours ago

@TheRebbeOfficial
Yeah, if i was training for the banter olympics i would just employ some ghetto blacks to talk shit to me all day to build resolve lol

Rebbe Schneerson
10 hours ago

@DOLO
In England “Banter” is absolutely ruthless. You find you mates weak point and take the piss relentlessly

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
Most of our comedians here in Sweden are politically correct and extremely boring. There are some good ones, but they’re only on the internet.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago
Yeah what Joel said

DOLO
10 hours ago
The ability to laugh at yourself is how i would describe banter

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago
Banter is a sensitivity test. It lets you know if you can trust and rely on a person in difficult times.

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
i spell banter with a rope and a truck

@Moonman
10 hours ago
I’ve got big chunks of my favourites missing

Rebbe Schneerson
10 hours ago

@Moonman
Fuck. Nooooooooo

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
You had probably gone to bed when I showed that

@Moonman
10 hours ago

@Smokey
fascist Freddy is also gone. He had great audiobooks and ebooks.

DOLO
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Yeah

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@DOLO
wut, freedy was banned too?

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
fark, that’s why my odysee notifs are low. I thought it was an upgrayed

Smokey
10 hours ago

@Moonman
yeah would not surprise me.

@Moonman
10 hours ago

@Smokey
From what I’ve heard the Canadian government went after him again and demanded he be removed from odyssee.

DOLO
10 hours ago
Also a guy called Nietzsche’s pupil that did mainly philosophy, but he was pro Hitler/NS

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
nordic resistance, facist freddy and jeremy mackenzie, all gone on odysee this week. some people say you can still get the content out of the blockchain on lbry’s site

@david_smith
10 hours ago
“The empty turkroach reverberates loudly” Sun Tsu

Smokey
10 hours ago
Yeah, a few channels I’ve been watching are suddenly gone…

Hide replies

@BMC1488
4 hours ago
Nordic Frontier getting banned was a big loss.

Smokey
10 hours ago
I’ve noticed Odysee has banned a few channels this week

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@Smokey
FascistFreddy is gone too

DOLO
10 hours ago
Fascist Freddy was banned as well

Smokey
10 hours ago
Any word on why he was banned?

@Ninja404
10 hours ago

@Smokey
about 48 hours ago plus or minus

Smokey
10 hours ago
Odysee seems to be getting strict.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago
For attention not fun? Weird.

Smokey
10 hours ago

@Moonman
Why did he get banned? I just checked, and his channel is gone.

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
I haven’t seen the Jord : Pavlova vid. Link anyone?

DOLO
10 hours ago
lol

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
i loved joels “debate” with the turk roach, i was sold after that

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@Ninja404
That is Thor

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
based, the more you know.

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
i only know joel

DOLO
10 hours ago

@Ninja404
Yes

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
\\\

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
is that blair catrell?

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Blair you should go on his stream if he has one

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
jajaja Jordies calling out Israel lately

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
me too, moon man, im kkkangry

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
Tice is disappointing. Farage is just as abysmal.

DOLO
10 hours ago
Very

DOLO
10 hours ago

@david_smith
Vey Aryan thing to do.

@Moonman
10 hours ago
I’m spewing about dissident being deleted

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
no no, raging dissident, of diagolon fame

Rebbe Schneerson
10 hours ago
(caps sorry)

@david_smith
10 hours ago
They stopped when they thought innocent dogs may get hurt by the bricks

Rebbe Schneerson
10 hours ago
i’M FROM THE uk AND YOU’RE 100% CORRECT

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
who was the guy asking about optics before? i mean i like rage… despite how much he cucks…. but this is where cucking gets you..

DOLO
10 hours ago

@Ninja404
Quartering got nuked? I actually dislike that guy.

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
no body has covered it that i have seen

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
i hope jeremy is okay, after his channel got nuked.

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DOLO
Good. It’s worth having a look at, but he is verbose. A long book, very detailed.

DOLO
10 hours ago

@Smokey
I did, thank you. I think i’ve read some of his work, the name is familiar.

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DOLO
– Did you see the name of the book I gave you on JFK?

DOLO
10 hours ago
Just make sure the Transport Police are not present because they are usually armed.

DOLO
10 hours ago
One*

DOLO
10 hours ago

@Smokey
Who of the only benefits of being a disarmed nation is that for a while at least you can go toe to toe with the cops.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@DOLO
There’s still transmissions not decoded today ‘The M4 Project is an effort to break 3 original Enigma messages with the help of distributed computing. The signals were intercepted in the North Atlantic in 1942 and are believed to be unbroken.
http://www.enigmaathome.net/

@david_smith
10 hours ago
The virus vax thing is a complex issue, like I mentioned earlier in chat it is a wedge issue, both the vax and virus were probably weapons. Then they send propaganda to make people fight for being on one incorrect side vs another.

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
we’re still simmering

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
zog*

@Ninja404
10 hours ago

@Smokey
the gov are big fags down there, fuck the x

Smokey
10 hours ago
I suspect that it is going to be very dangerous being a police officer in the near future in countries like Ireland and England.

Smokey
10 hours ago
wow that’s crazy. telling you that you will be arrested for showing up in a public place?

DOLO
10 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
They’ll never break the code!

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
we did it… reddit!!111!!oneone!!!!eleven!!!

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
o7 o/

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
lol

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago
A little elongated but it’s still good ^

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
dawn shamed again….

@Ninja404
came through tho

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
awesome gents!

@Moonman
10 hours ago
R

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
Rrrrrrrrr

DOLO
10 hours ago
E

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
G

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
G

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
G

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
I

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago
N

@GrandPaLampshade
10 hours ago
Covid was a gift ( it shows you the police , politicians , Unions , Religous groups , welfare groups etc are spinless maggots that will turn on you )

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
can we get an N tower for joel?

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@david_smith
They should get Rand on, I’m sure he’ll have something insightful to reiterate from “the boyz”

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
“it is better to be a warrior in a garden, than a gardener in a war” – Sun Zu Davis

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@david_smith
there is a reason my first comment on any stream is “hello lads”…………

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
o/ patriots!

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
lol woman or the dog as bait?

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
X’D

@david_smith
10 hours ago
We need Tom on the show to stop chat talking shit through the show

@Moonman
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@david_smith
LOOL you dont even know who new zealands best streamer even is…. was callaghan even around in 2019?

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@Ninja404
:rofl:

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@david_smith
LOL

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
thanks, Dan.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
ok thank will check it out. feel free to post/chat on my community page if you have anything you think i might be interested in

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Your are only saying that because callaghan got on joe rogan

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
only culligan is better than CCG, ya know know cause he sniffed his sisters pussy.

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
Back again. Blinking son #2 always wanting a chat

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@david_smith
cat man is literally new zealands 2nd best streamer… there is no shaming him…

@Moonman
10 hours ago

@Ninja404
Have fun. Sounds like a pleasant weekend

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
i have a full box of clays and a full ammo can of target shot

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
dan, found it here:

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@david_smith
I don’t see the problem really

DOLO
10 hours ago

@Smokey
Cheers.

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DOLO
Final Judgement: The Missing Link in The JFK Assassination.

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
no game, probably just some shotgunning and chilling in the forest

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@david_smith
I heard it, was busy not watching, just listening

DOLO
10 hours ago

@Smokey
What’s the book called? I like Piper.

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
has left chat?

@david_smith
10 hours ago
lol CCG shamed

@david_smith
10 hours ago
What game?

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
Camping

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
– He’s a French writer, his book is dedicated to Michael Collins Piper. I do not think it is mainstream.

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
just confirmed im going csmping this weekend!!

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
i dont watch anything main stream, so no i have no idea.

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
I recently watched that documentary on the JFK and RFK assassinations by that French writer. Do you know the one I mean? It was pretty interesting.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
black pilled did a good stream on it i think

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
nor the jew rubenstein who killed oswald did it to “protect jews”

Smokey
10 hours ago
5th Dimensional Warfare.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
about the jfk thing… what you wont read about is his praise of hitler…… or the fact the jew zapruder who filmed it didnt even flinch when the gun went off behind him and the bullet went literally over his head

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
The Zapruder film didnt flinch when jfk was killed live on tv in a killing of the king ritual

@Moonman
10 hours ago

@jbabybakes
Yeah that is crazy

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
I’m reading Michael Collins Piper’s book right now on the JFK assassination. So I know what they’re capable of. But I’m speaking more about the details surrounding the Trump shooting. A lot of questions there.

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
37 assassinations to get a jew elected in mexico

@david_smith
10 hours ago
They will use viruses and vaccines, make it a wedge issue and make people think viruses are not real

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
in 2016 with the election of trump literally everything since has been obvious, they were obviously going to censor the internet which they did, they were obviously going to do everything they could to stop us which is why they released the coof….

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
they treat earth like a private minecraft server

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
There’s no Antisemitism without Semitism. Simple as.

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
yes its that bad

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
its not that strange if you have been following politics for at least the last decade, in fact its to be expected

Smokey
10 hours ago
Netanyahu even told them, “No! Don’t clap! Listen!” aha. The Boss is speaking.

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
whites need to control the root of all evil. create a shadow dollar & stfu about it until you have enough power to replace the dollar

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Yeah. I saw that. but a lot of questions….very strange.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
oh he was definitely shot. there is a clear screen shot showing the bullet that hit him…. but this is a very complicated issue… its maybe going to spiral the left into starting the civil war… but its also going to put the normies to sleep

@PureNomad
10 hours ago
100%

Smokey
10 hours ago
I just saw a new clip today of the shooter running around on the roof, and Secret Service and police never noticed that? 150 meters away? Does not pass the bullshit smell test.

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
all it cost was selling his daughter to the kushner family

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
It’s not a white mindset, that’s for sure.

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
his father was a massive developer in israel

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Do you think Trump was really shot, or is it gay ops?

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
trump was personally saved from bankruptcy by rothschilds loans

Smokey
10 hours ago
trump’s ear seems to be healing nicely. No mark at all.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@HoldTheHeathenHammerHigh
while the 109 thing is the meme… the actual number of times they were kicked out was over 1030 times……… i have the short list on my channel…

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
Amazing mindset when you think about it.

@david_smith
10 hours ago
imagine banning 109 people from chat and the cube

Smokey
10 hours ago
yeah. imagine getting kicked out of 109 pubs and blaming the bar staff. :joy: :joy:

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
break more toasters ffs…. i need more content….

Smokey
10 hours ago
Jews are the largest donors to both the Democrats and Republicans. Yet they are only around 2% of the population.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
109 countries, but NEVER their fault. Funny how that works.

Smokey
10 hours ago
Miriam Adelson pledged $100 Million to get Trump elected.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
o/ IDK yet maybe monday

@david_smith
10 hours ago
good luck trying to red pill the chat

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
1913 the jews were given america, 1917 america gave jews the middle east….. its nothing new

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
Bingo.

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
More

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
I know.

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
congress kisses jew ass because they’re in mossad’s blackmail economy

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
*odd

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Balanced ratio of lies per minute vs standing ovation by minute

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
thats nothing new. its been happening for the last 100 off years…. look into uss liberty

Smokey
10 hours ago
Blair, it’s bad. Real bad.

Smokey
10 hours ago
Netanyahu is literally a war criminal and they give him 58 standing ovations.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
The future for white children. o/

Smokey
10 hours ago
that Netanyahu speech was crazy – 58 standing ovations? so crazy.

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
yeah, that’s probably true, the trick is to unify into a cohesive or coordinated group.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
o/

DOLO
10 hours ago
That’s exactly why they kept clapping lol

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
sup cat man. whens the next stream?

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
its why the uk gov are gulagging people who arent even breaking laws…..

@PureNomad
10 hours ago
the beautiful red hair jews line had me lol

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
we were past 3% in the meme war of 2015/16… we are FAR above that now which is why all the censorship

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
purpose of democracy is to conceal oligarchy

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
10 hours ago
The state is ruled by the enemy

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
Sam’s judge let off pedo’s before sentencing Sam for stickering…

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
thanks. 3% is not many. but we’re not there yet.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
this is why i particularly like tom, i dont agree 100% with him but i 100% agree with what he is doing… join an active group

DOLO
10 hours ago

@Smokey
Is Dalton allowed on?

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
I’m glad that they are rioting on the streets and showing that there is a limit. It proves that there’s still hope.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
that is why they are trying to shut us down so hard

Smokey
10 hours ago
Kevin MacDonald is another example of god optics. Literally a professor and academic, yet he is banned on on social media.

@PureNomad
10 hours ago
it’s like the protest in London last night, they arrested random people. And gave them a caution to not attend future protests

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
it only matters what you do, not how you look… i think the stat is that you only need 15% with an unshakable believe but you only need 3% to get onto the streets to make a revolution

@Aus1788
10 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
will never know but the English youth is one of the cuckd demographics I’m Europe

@WhiteStrike
10 hours ago
that’s happening everywhere, in the US recently a nigger got 180 days for raping 4 and 9 year olds while a dude just got 20 years for clear self defense

DOLO
10 hours ago
NA got 8 years some of them.

Smokey
10 hours ago
2 years prison for putting up stickers.

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
its now kick sfo cause hes a faggot

@Ninja404
10 hours ago
LOL KICK VEE

@WhiteStrike
10 hours ago
I heard a kid had been thrown out of a window, that’s why CPS was involved

Smokey
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Yes. When you talk about ‘jews’ and ‘race,’ it does not matter whether you are wearing a suit and tie or a swastika on your T-shirt – they will still hate you. There is now ‘optical’ way to talk about these things.

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago

@Aus1788
You never know.

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Kick Vee

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
good optics grow our numbers, bad optics makes us look like fools n loons – unlearnable for some, sadly

@david_smith
10 hours ago
LPVO FTW

DOLO
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Yeah, i’ve seen so many 35yr old looking black ‘teens’

@WhiteStrike
10 hours ago
yeah, compromising for the sake of NPC’s gets us nowhere

jbabybakes
10 hours ago
Scare all hoes, last one standing gets a ring

@Aus1788
10 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
likely murder two self hating whites.. But still a loss

Smokey
10 hours ago
Jared Taylor has great ‘optics’ – he’s banned from all social media platforms.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Smokey
optics have never mattered.. they will slur us no matter if we are anywhere right of chairman mao…

Smokey
10 hours ago
Aesthetics are powerful, I agree.

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
He murdered 2 of OURS. Parental & familial heartbreak aside, think of how much progeny we have lost.

Smokey
10 hours ago
Yeah, but the Left have shitty optics and are in power.

jbabybakes
10 hours ago

@Smokey
How much money goes into advertising & marketing?

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@Smokey
Trump likes bad optics

@Aus1788
10 hours ago
the very fact that they have to come out and say we can’t blame race just demonstrates that it’s a racial problem

Smokey
10 hours ago
Do optics really matter?

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
Such a horror show.

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@DOLO
apparently it was born in the UK to nigger parents so the age thing is likely accurate. its only the first gen invaders who claim to be “kids” so they get an easier path to illegal occupancy

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Jews kill thousands of children all the time, just a small sample of what is coming.

warren-g
10 hours ago

@WhiteStrike
remember all of it…teach it to future generations

@WhiteStrike
10 hours ago
Don’t get sad, get angry, then get even

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
I saw the images of those little girls. It almost made me cry.

DOLO
10 hours ago
They probably are lying about his age so they don’t have to reveal any details.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
10 hours ago
Race first. Always.

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
jajaja he was totally 17… …as am i…

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
I don’t believe for 1 second that he’s 17

Smokey
10 hours ago
Yeah

Smokey
10 hours ago
They said he was 17, but he looks about 35.

@david_smith
10 hours ago
He was nigletted as achild

DOLO
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
Absolutely.

@david_smith
10 hours ago
oh a youth

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@DOLO
makes a lot of sense. easy to be a sparky that also learns hvac than the other way around

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
“17” who looked 40…

DOLO
10 hours ago
Born in Cardiff

@Moonman
10 hours ago
They’re different from us, not in a good way and they have to leave now. Whatever shitty beliefs they hold is just another layer of incapability on top of the core problem.

DOLO
11 hours ago
I used to go with the air con lads to wire it up for them, i had about a 30 min job and got paid as much as they did.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
11 hours ago
“Racism” = Survival instinct

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@jbabybakes
Choose the one that you more attracted to

DOLO
11 hours ago

@jbabybakes
You can choose to do air con as an electrician.

@david_smith
11 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
I have sated earlier I care more about genetics, I simply want to know if there is info on a simple question

jbabybakes
11 hours ago
what trade is better, electrician or HVAC?

DOLO
11 hours ago

@Aus1788
o/

@Aus1788
11 hours ago
Blessings to my European Aryan brothers and sisters 0/ be well of good mind and body

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@david_smith
It doesn’t matter. Rwanda has a horrid recent history. Let’s not have them in our homes.

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago

@david_smith
it dosnt matter if he holds one of the jewish religions,… he was a shitskin invader

@david_smith
11 hours ago
Dans has lots of alcohol

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago
its a religious myth just like the holocaust

@david_smith
11 hours ago
I was just trying to find out if anyone knows if the thing was a muslim or not, there are conflicting claims.

@WhiteStrike
11 hours ago
so dumb

Smokey
11 hours ago
Because they are totally demoralized.

@WhiteStrike
11 hours ago
“it’s all jewish”

Smokey
11 hours ago
Yuri Bezmenov said that you can show normies facts, data, etc. and they still will not change their thinking.

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago

@WhiteStrike
no scholar who wrote about such things ever wrote about the things claimed in the jesus story at the time, the (((eye witnesses))) who claimed he existed were born some 20 to 400 years after the story was invented…

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@david_smith
Precisely. None of the 3rd world should be anywhere around us in the 1st place.

@WhiteStrike
11 hours ago
Jews don’t follow the Torah

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago
i know the first books of christianity are the same books of the jewish torah which existed before

@WhiteStrike
11 hours ago
“I know history, Jesus was invented”

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
11 hours ago
Nobody hates all non-whites as individuals. Most of us perfectly understand the difference between general group pattern and individuals. But they still all need to leave. The west is ours.

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago
nah dont like him at all… but i know history……….

@WhiteStrike
11 hours ago
ah so you’re an Adam Greenberg fan

@david_smith
11 hours ago
My point is is if they were not a muslim, then subversives like Tommy have no argument. I have no idea if they were muslim.

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago

@WhiteStrike
what was the religion called before the story of jesus was invented?

@WhiteStrike
11 hours ago
A judeo-Christian isn’t a Christian either

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago

@david_smith
its a whole lot more difficult to understand that simply “which flavour of the jewish religion is he”. there are massive swaths of “white” judeo-christians who are far worse than say assad the muslim leader of syria.

@Moonman
11 hours ago
When nons feel the pressure they’ll leave.

@WhiteStrike
11 hours ago
No real Christian is stabbing little girls…

@Ninja404
11 hours ago
^^^

@david_smith
11 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
For example misdirecting it as a purely religious issue eg. Tommy Robinson who is antiWhite and just misdirects to a subsection of muslims

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@david_smith
What if he was raised Christian? Rwanda is predominantly Christian.

Smokey
11 hours ago
I saw a lot of White women on Twitter attacking those brave White men protesting and fighting with police in England.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
11 hours ago
If everything was hopeless the censorship would be unnecessary.

@david_smith
11 hours ago
It does, I’m more genetics based in thinking. The truth is important for various reasons.

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@david_smith
His religion doesn’t matter.

@david_smith
11 hours ago
Was it even a muslim?

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
Rwandan. Southport.

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
We’re still comfortable, even in the slow decline.

ChainReaction
11 hours ago
“When will there be justice in Athens? There will be justice in Athens when those who are not injured are as outraged as those who are.” ~ Thucydides

@Moonman
11 hours ago
it was fantastic

@Moonman
11 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
lol my boomer mums on board. COVID woke her up.

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
I don’t hear about all these other protests.

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago

@Moonman
and that is a glorious thing, when the normie began to hate

@Moonman
11 hours ago

@danzimmons
It’s the beginning of the end. Their abuse of power is beginning to rub even the normies the wrong way.

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@BoSinn
Thanks

Bo Sinn
11 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
no, the Dick Pusey incident

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@whiterabbit
4 re Southport?

danzimmons
11 hours ago
yeah lol

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@danzimmons
Re Blair vs Tommeh: In size, not in fundamentals

danzimmons
11 hours ago
the systems going after the protester’s like they slaughtered innocent children

@whiterabbit
11 hours ago
4 died

danzimmons
11 hours ago
lol Blair equal’s three tommehs

ChainReaction
11 hours ago
it’s just abuse of power, pure n simple

DOLO
11 hours ago
Dick Pussy lol

Bo Sinn
11 hours ago
why does Blair look like Tommy Robinson right now?

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
We can’t get burners anymore

@DOLO

danzimmons
11 hours ago
fucking zogbots man take a knee fagget’s

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
11 hours ago
Community driven distros only. Corporate Linux sucks.

ChainReaction
11 hours ago
Linux is da whey

@Moonman
11 hours ago
Jacob’s a champ. Showed the clip to a coworker today, after working with him for a while he’s now sympathetic to the cause.

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago

@DOLO
yea its part of the digital ID shit

DOLO
11 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
I can see that happening globally, or at least in the west.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
11 hours ago
Goolag.

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
11 hours ago
Crapple and Microshaft.

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago
you gotta give ID to get a number here now

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago

@DOLO
dont think you can get “burners” down here in aus any more,even in the 90’s the only way was to get prepaid sims from a servo but im pretty sure they ended that long ago now

DOLO
11 hours ago

@Moonman
o/

@Moonman
11 hours ago

@DOLO
good idea, cheers

ChainReaction
11 hours ago
Friendly Jordies made a funny vid abt Drew Pavlu lel

@TASMANIANDEVIL
11 hours ago
Based superchat

Hold The Heathen Hammer High ᛟᛉᛏ
11 hours ago
All big tech companies are onboard with the anti-white globalist agenda.

DOLO
11 hours ago

@Moonman
You could always get a burner sim card just for sign-ups

@GoyBoy1488
11 hours ago
$14.88
this has become one of my favorite shows, despite being american. Thanks for the good work lads

@Moonman
11 hours ago
I’m banned from telegram and not a big fan of it requiring a number.

Bo Sinn
11 hours ago
make a private channel where you forward posts from, seems to work

@filled_soda
11 hours ago
$5.00
Thanks for your content. I’m here in Belfast, Northern Potato Nigger Land and I’m incredibly angry at recent events (the murder of three little girls and the sickening leftist reaction). I recently found your show, but I’m happy to find a stream that doesn’t pull any punches. 14/88!

@Moonman
11 hours ago
o/ hey fellas

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago
o/

@DanTheOracle
11 hours ago
hello lads

danzimmons
11 hours ago
°///

@katana17
12 hours ago
Grandma Waffen image:
https://katana17.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Grandma-Waffen-SS-Anime-20240724.jpg

@katana17
12 hours ago
Here’s one for Tom: [Thomas Sewell – Messiah or Caeser – Jul 25, 2024 – Transcript]

Thomas Sewell – Messiah or Caeser – Jul 25, 2024 – Transcript

@katana17
12 hours ago
Here’s last week’s transcript: [Joel Davis – When Will Enough Be Enough? – Jul 25, 2024 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – When Will Enough Be Enough? – Jul 25, 2024 – Transcript

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/17/2024 = 68)

danzimmons
11 days ago
jews ruin & invert everything, they’ve pozd every important institution in the west.

29
1
Hide replies

@What3
11 days ago
True, in addition to that tho, look at the very snapshots and pictures presented in the video, what is the major demographic? Jews have their golems and most of them are traitors. Traitors get no quarter, they know the right thing but do otherwise. Jews arent white/aryan, they’re a foreign group at least their hostility can be dealt with. U never see traitors coming and when its seen, a lot of people like to give them forgiveness/leeway. That has to stop.
Yayah sinwar, the head of hummus said with his own mouth that it is traitors who were the biggest obstacle to Palestinian dissidents getting statehood because they acted on behalf of jews as jannisaries/golems; selling out dissidents, thwarting their efforts, leaking intel etc.
Sinwar was tasked with rooting out these traitors….and liquidating them. Until aryans get over that soft spot they have for traitors…jews will keep winning. The Dutch used to keelhaul traitors; drag them across the bottom of their ships, the British used to hang them forthwith. Just sayin. Traitors make the best golems for jews or any outside group hostile to the group being betrayed.
Less

7
0

@Spectromancer
11 days ago
While they drag us into war. We are at the end of the parasites life cycle I think. The spores get spread over our ashes.

6
0
ThinRedLine
11 days ago
Get in the pit

23
0
Hide replies

@nboeger
11 days ago
I came here to say the same thing.

2
0
Hide replies
ThinRedLine
10 days ago
cactus crew

1
0
Robert Demon
9 days ago
MEGAPIT.

4
0
Hide replies

@filled_soda
7 days ago(edited)
Mmmmmmmmmmm-MEGAPIT

@dsallen7
11 days ago
They Reproduce Through Abuse!

23
0
ThinRedLine
11 days ago
We are paying for our own destruction

21
0
Hide replies
Vettekid1488
11 days ago
just said those very words to my neighbor yesterday smh we are subsidizing our own demise

3
0

@BMC1488
11 days ago
Thanks Jews!

11
1

@What3
11 days ago
no cohencidences

11
0
Matt Hammond
11 days ago
These LGBT perverts are the extremists, not nationalists.

9
0
Fan of the Era
11 days ago
faggots should kill themselves

10
1
Hide replies
Vettekid1488
11 days ago
yeah sling themselves off of tall buildings would be pretty cool

3
0
Elizabeth1984
11 days ago
its perversion ,if i ever come accross one of them half naked in my town,i’m going to rush to a caffee and get hot black coffee and throw it on them

8
0
Hide replies
wytisryt441
10 days ago
based

1
0
ThinRedLine
11 days ago
regarding the video of the pride event : how is this not an illegal public display of obscenity ?

8
0
Hide replies

@01123581379
11 days ago
the human chimeras are coming in 2030 with their own pride flag and if you don’t love it you’re a bigot

5
0
Vettekid1488
11 days ago
I heard one parade in America had men massaging their meat sticks smh

1
0
Hide replies
ThinRedLine
11 days ago
disgusting

HeliRides4AntiWhites
11 days ago
The police are making an exception for these perverts because that is their (((overlord’s))) agenda

1
0
Hide replies
ThinRedLine
11 days ago
agreed

Brynner737
11 days ago(edited)
I was once in a car that took us to see the Pride parade in Toronto because they knew how disgusted I would be. It was beyond what I could imagine – faggots walking around naked and even sucking each other in broad daylight in public – blatantly against the law. If I did it with my wife we would be arrested and charged instantly, yet the police marched side-by-side with those sick bastards, encouraging them.
Never forget, the police and governments in Western countries are against decency and are enemies of civilization. If not, they wouldn’t allow any of this.

6
0

@Deanfranjek
10 days ago
God I wish Hitler had won

4
0
Hide replies
Robert Demon
9 days ago
Imagine how white, crime free and family friendly Europe would be, such a shame they lost the war.

HydraulicHydra
11 days ago
Man, I find porn gross. Like yes yes it’s sinful it messes up your brain etc etc but even beyond that. It’s just… Blech.

3
0

@MaybeNextTime
11 days ago
Rainbows belong to little kids not sexually confused, narcissistic, exhibitionist adults.

3
0
Hide replies
JimB
11 days ago
They’re not sexually confused, though. They’re sexually degenerate.

2
0
Hide replies

@MaybeNextTime
11 days ago
Yes and some heterosexuals wave the flag at children as well.
Those are simply degenerate

2
0
Hide replies
JimB
11 days ago(edited)
Well, if they’re hetero they’re not confused either, just shitlibs. I’d say the only confused ones are the children and teens. Either way, I’m not trying to be too argumentative with you, m8, just pointing out something that I think some of us assume about these degenerates, namely that they’re confused, which entails the unspoken possibility that they simply need to have things cleared up. They’re degenerates and shitlibs, out to confuse and mind-rape the youngsters. And in many cases, actually rape them.

2
0

@noreplacement
11 days ago
I hope you’re are right about Sophia not noticing Mark. These evil people know a backround, steady drip of this vile stuff gradually seeps into their young, plastic minds.

3
0
Hide replies
Save your offspring
10 days ago
When my daughter reached the age of about 9, I finally woke up and connected the dots of “strange observatons”, “accidentally dysfunctional paedagogics”, “accidentally bad advice considering child-rearing from the state”, …
it’s all one big web. And if you as a parent aren’t aware soon enough, and guide and teach your children and keep them away, they will become dysfunctional adults, like 80% of today are. Their line will end with them, or at best with their children.
It’s a war, far more deadly than WW1+2 combined.

1
0

@Deanfranjek
11 days ago
Surely we can repeat the events if 1939 surely

4
1
Hide replies

@MaybeNextTime
11 days ago
Weimar problems invite Weimar Solutions.
And we are way past Weimar

4
0
Robert Demon
9 days ago
I hope so and then the faggots can burn.

1
0
Good Evening Godless Sodomites!
11 days ago
LGB is about sexual preference..
T is about mental illness & attention seeking.
Q is about actively destroying civilization out of a deep seated hatred for everything normal.
None of these things are suitable for children

5
2
Hide replies

@Deanfranjek
11 days ago
Spot on that

3
0
Hide replies
Vettekid1488
11 days ago
celebrating mental illness and degenerate deviant behavior smh

1
0
JimB
11 days ago(edited)
Just remember that each letter is a bird of the same feather.

1
0
Hide replies
Good Evening Godless Sodomites!
10 days ago(edited)
Edit: Ah wait! You are right! By my own logic bellow (the Islam comparison) they are birds of a feather!
Kind of, but not exactly…
Based on the UK government census data of 2021, only 1% of LGBs also say they are T and/or Q.
We’ve had bummers all throughout history and we can get by with a few bummers as long as that’s all their up to.
The Qs are a different matter altogether, they’re basically the equivalent of Jihadis.
In that respect it may be fair to compare LGBTQ+ to Islam as a whole, and within that the Ts are the equivalent of Muslim Rape Gangs, and the Qs are ISIS & Hamas.

Robert Demon
9 days ago
They are all degenerate pederasts who belong in a pit.

1
0
Hide replies
Good Evening Godless Sodomites!
9 days ago
Yes but there are different layers of hell.
People who rape kids & animals should be tortured to death in public.
A grumpy old lezza? Not so much, as long as she isn’t causing any trouble I think we can leave her be (but FFS stop giving them government funding and special treatment!).

Marcus
8 days ago
Hi Mark,
It’s me, the black guy who used to message you on Facebook. I love your work and resonate deeply with your message. It’s unfortunate that England is experiencing racial changes, and I believe separation by race is necessary to avoid conflict and tension. Many black and Asian people don’t see this and are focused on fitting in and financial gain. While I don’t agree with everything white nationalists say, I do think immigration harms Europe and Britain. Despite our differences, I support your work and hope for a better future.
Yours sincerely,
The Black guy who supports your work

2
0
Hide replies
Jagdeep Jano
6 days ago
If you ever decided to start making videos using these talking points and sharing your views
on things, it would likely be very lucrative once you built up a following. eg. The Hodge Twins, and to a lesser extent Tommy Sotomayor

1
0
Hide replies
Marcus
3 days ago
No I don’t think so ultimately my veiws are very controversial as I don’t beleive multiculteralism works or that each race can cohexist in a way that feels natural and authentic so people would not likely support my veiws. As a black person raised in multiculteral Birmingham I am expected to see diversity and multiculturalism as normal and not question it, i am not meant to have a brain and am meant to look up to stormzy and ash sakaar for my logic. it couldn’t make sense. the other blacks and browns would not listen to me as they have already made up their mind on how reality works. i am also not white so i couldnt make videos on white nationalism as i am black and have a totally different experience. fortunately there are people like mark and laura trying to make a difference to the world and hopefully in the future in race will live separately

1
0
Htrac
9 days ago
The amount spent on this LGBTQP+ stuff is absurd. Every large and medium sized company, every charity, every council, and the government themselves, spends billions on painting rainbows on everything, repainting all the trains and trams and ambulances and police cars, repainting the roads, having banners and flags everywhere.
It’s honestly so bizarre and I don’t understand how normies don’t see how weird it is. Especially after they added the brown chevrons for “black and brown” people to the rainbow flag. I genuinely thought that was a joke started by 4chan, but it was real. The flag is just “anything except white men”. They celebrate and praise and push anything that stops white people from reproducing.
The measure for how insane things are is imagine explaining what’s happening to people from a few decades ago. Even the gays in the 80s would be shocked at the pride parades today.

2
0

@nboeger
11 days ago
Anyone who supports this LGBTQ garbage needs to get in the pit.

2
0
Hide replies
Robert Demon
9 days ago
MEGAPIT.

1
0
HeliRides4AntiWhites
11 days ago(edited)
Their appropriation of the rainbow is an outright mocking of God, as the rainbow was his sign to mankind he would not destroy the world, although with the groomers doing what they do, maybe He ought to reconsider.

2
0
Hide replies
Jagdeep Jano
6 days ago
It was a sign He wouldn’t flood the world again, Jesus is going to destroy this place when He comes back though, don’t worry about that

Hide replies
HeliRides4AntiWhites
5 days ago
I really would not blame Him at this point

1
0
Nothing of interest.
7 days ago
Well guess who’s having MORE children now. Well it’s certainly not these LGBT +WHATEVER.

1
0
Robert Demon
9 days ago
I would love to go to that pride parade wielding an assault rifle and cutting all them faggots in half.

0
1
Robert Demon
9 days ago
The lgbt faggots use the rainbow on purpose to attract children because they are pederasts, not only do they want to molest children but this is how they reproduce, it’s only a matter of time before there’s a p attached to their title. For every white child turned faggot also reduces white peoples numbers because they’re not having a family, so it serves the pederast jews who are trying to kill white people well. I hope I live to see these pederasts hang.

0
1

@SPWKarlsson
10 days ago
RAINBOW PUNX – How Antiwhite Pride Events Groom Children for a Lifetime of Degenerate Self Erasure

1
0
HydraulicHydra
11 days ago
LGBT decides to have their month in JEW-NE! Coincidence? I think not!

1
0
Vettekid1488
11 days ago
totally destroy the moral compass of future generations smh

1
0
Save your offspring
9 days ago
Very well done! Is there something like PA in Germany?

Cone of Silence
10 days ago
Weimar, money runs politicians and then the government.
Take away the money from political donations and whilst there’s still time, there will be no incentive.
NGO’s, Lobby think tanks and International Treaties hold countries to ransom, get out of any Zionist World Forums and purge those that harm societies and it’s children.

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 1 – Intro – Jun 29, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 2 – Jul 6, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

Joel Davis: We are live. It is the 13th of June 2024. Should be a good show tonight. I think Tom will join us in a little bit. He said he would join, but for the moment it’s just Blair and I. How you feeling, Blair? How you doing?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I’m good, man. Been a big week. Busy day. Always. Busy, busy, busy, busy! But making it work, running your own business, it gives you a bit more freedom, but it’s a lot more work for your mind. You can’t just switch off at the end of the day. But that’s what I choose to do. It’s what I have to do. It’s kind of what the government’s forced me to do. Government doesn’t like, … Oh, hang on a sec. I’ve actually got, 1 second. 1 second, 1 second.

 

Joel Davis: What happened?

 

Blair Cottrell: Nothing! I had the Rumble link open so I could hear my own voice and was spitting me out. I’m like:

 

“What the fuck? That’s me talking.”

 

Don’t worry, I fixed it.

 

Joel Davis: Amateur hour.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. How’s your week been, my friend? What’s on, what’s news?

 

Joel Davis: It’s been pretty good. Just been plugging away, working on these, … I’ve got all these like half finished essays, so I’m trying to get one of them to completion. I see Thomas joined. Start publishing some things on my Substack. Also Tom and I actually recorded an interview on the weekend with Lana from Red Ice. I think she said she’s going to post that maybe in the next, like later this week, over the weekend maybe. I don’t know exactly what day. But so that will come out. That should be interesting content for you guys.

 

Also, when I did the Elijah Schaefer show, I actually took Tom with me and him and Elijah recorded something actually, which Elijah is going to release, I think, also over the next couple days at some point. So with the Elijah Schaefer Tom Sewell interview, you’ll get the Tom and Joel Red Ice interview.

 

So there’s been a little bit of content cooking in the background for you guys. But we’ve got a great show for you this evening. A lot on the agenda.

 

And I was going to get straight into it because I want to get you guys thoughts on these things. I’m sure a lot of people have seen they had the European Parliament elections across Europe last week. And all the populist Right-wing anti-immigration parties basically just did really well all across Europe. But they’ve been polling well for the last couple of years and that was to be expected.

 

I thought actually they didn’t do as well as the media sensationalism kind of blew it out of proportion. Did all right, but I thought they could have done better. They were polling better, I thought last year, some of these parties.

 

[02:46]

 

But anyway, that’s the narrative that anti-immigration politics is on the rise. I think it’s a valid narrative. Also posted on Telegram a graph talking about the changing, like the sentiment between Zoomers and older generations.

 

And basically it was showing that Swedish Zoomers and German Zoomers and French Zoomers are way more anti-immigration than the rest of the population, which is quite surprising, but also quite encouraging.

 

Then also we have Nigel Farage announcing that he’s going to join up with the Reform Party. They’re surging in the polls now. They’re competing with the conservatives in the polls for the Right-wing vote. They almost split the Right-wing vote in half between the two parties. That’s really interesting to break down.

 

But basically what we’re seeing is that obviously it’s election year in the United States, British election next month. There’s going to be French elections and all this turmoil there after Le Pen’s National Rally party did really well in the European electionss basically there is a kind of vibe shift, there is a paradigm shift where increasingly Right-wing discourse is fixated upon immigration, almost entirely. And that seems to be the winning ticket.

 

We’re seeing Nigel Farage going out to the media and just talking about immigration constantly. That’s the whole election campaign that they’re going to run is just:

 

“Why would you vote for the conservatives? They keep saying they’re going to reduce immigration but increase it!”

 

It’s all quite interesting to observe, to think, well, if all this can happen over there, how come we’re not really getting that much here and what implications that might have for Australian politics. And what implications it has in general. Because what I said is all of these fake Right parties or populist Right parties or whatever, I say fake Right in the sense that they all ascent to liberalism, they all ascent to liberal democracy, they all ascent to basically what the Left was saying in the 1990s, almost entirely. But they’re just like:

 

“Hey, don’t you think we’ve got a few too many migrants coming in?”

 

And have like an optical anti-immigration stance.

 

But nevertheless, what that shows is, I think a shift in how people conceive of the Right. Like in the two thousands, when people thought about the Right-wing, they thought about conservatives, they thought about tax, like lower taxes and smaller governments and capitalism versus socialism and maybe like some Christian, you know, moral issues that the Right champion and the Left oppose, like gay marriage or something. Obviously, the LGBT thing is still there and relevant. But increasingly the division is racial. Increasingly the division is identitarian.

 

So how did you guys perceive these? Because I’m sure you’ve seen all the news. How are you perceiving this? Do you see this as a positive thing, like polarization is happening, things are moving in the correct direction, or are you less optimistic?

 

[05:56]

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you reckon, Tom?

 

Thomas Sewell: No, you first, Blair, please.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, all that comes to mind from my standpoint is its just national existentialism. I think it doesn’t matter how hard you hit Europeans with propaganda, you’re not going to completely eliminate the basic collective instincts or the instinct for collective self preservation.

 

So I think a lot of people in Europe, specifically France, are starting to understand that their ethnic identity is being threatened, that unless something changes and unless something changes in a radical way, there’s not going to be French people in the future! You’re not going to be able to go on a holiday to France and see French people. They’re going to go extinct!

 

Like I said, no amount of propaganda is going to convince every last Frenchman that they need to die out. Eventually, they’re going to understand that they are dying out and they’re going to do something about it!

 

And I think what we’re seeing in the polls, what we’re seeing in the elections right now is exactly that, just an outward expression of the international existentialism that is trying to express itself. Like, it’s just, that’s the way I look at it, really? What do you think?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, it’s just good to see that the Zoomers in a lot of European countries are leading the polls in terms of nationalistic political views. They’re seeing the outcome of multiculturalism, and they’re seeing the outcome or the decay of liberalism. And liberalism is, it hasn’t completely run its course, but liberalism is running its course. People are more depressed than ever. They have less of an identity than ever, or a more corrupted sense of identity than ever. They’re completely humiliated and demoralized. And most people just accept this.

 

But there is a part, I think, of all people, no matter how demoralized they are before obviously crossing over that point of becoming completely demoralized and becoming a communist, I think there’s a part of a lot of people that want that reinvigoration, that spirit of their people.

 

They do believe that their people exist and have an identity, no matter how much they’ve been browbeat. And the diversity, I think we spoke about this maybe in person or on the last show. The diversity in the nineties and two thousands. The liberalism of the nineties and two thousands was a pretty good sell.

 

I mean, the hedonism, the lifestyle. You know, you get the best migrants from the third world. You know, you get more chicken shops or whatever it is. More restaurants. You know, you get doctors and engineers. And the Liberalism as well is like compared to the Soviet Union, where everything was banned and totalitarianism and socialism, bad! You know, in the nineties, in the US or Britain or Australia, you had awesome movies coming out, you could wear what you wanted to wear!

 

And so there was just all these endless benefits for the youth and for the middle class. And now liberalism is like a Drag Queen Story Hour and more brown people! And Drag Queen Story Hour! And more brown people! And your kids go to school and they get indoctrinated into gay sex and anti-White hatred!

 

And so it’s reached its, I wouldn’t say climax, that’s probably the wrong word, but it has reached its decay.

 

[09:31]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, we got a $6 donation, while you were speaking from Skinhead Friend, he says:

 

“I still think we need more Jeet Shakers.”

 

Does anyone want to explain to me what a Jeet Shaker is? I’m not sure what that is, and I’m being honest. What do you, what do you think, Joe? What’s that mean?

 

Joel Davis: I’m not sure if it’s a thug shaker reference, but that still makes me confused.

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. Well, thanks for your comment, and thanks for your money. Feel free to send more and ask a new question. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Well, I wanted to stay on this subject because, yeah, I love my graphs because I’m autistic.

 

So here we go. I posted this on Telegram. It was actually originally posted by Henrik from Red Ice. That’s where I got it from the question was posed:

 

“There are many foreign nations whose cultures are so incompatible with our own way of life that I would prefer if their people were never allowed to immigrate here.”

 

And this shows a spectrum of countries and the percentage which agree. Red is percentage of young adults born between 1997 and, 20006. So basically, Zoomers who agree. And the blue is percentage of older population born before 1997 who agree. We can see here really pathetic numbers. Canada, United States, and United Kingdom. That’s pretty sad viewing.

 

Australia, as far as the Anglo-sphere goes, we are way more anti-immigrant than the other Anglo-sphere countries.

 

So I guess that’s maybe some cause for optimism. But what’s interesting here is that our Zoomers are less anti-immigrant than the older generations, where if we look at Germany, France, and look at Sweden! I mean, the Swedish Zoomers, and, it’s about like 70% of Swedish Zoomers or two thirds. I think that the other third of Swedish Zoomers aren’t even White!

 

So it’s like literally all the White Swedish Zoomers are like:

 

“Fuck these Muslims and niggas that they let in!”

 

Blair Cottrell: So why is that, though? Is there more youth crime? And by “youth” crime, I mean more …

 

Joel Davis: Yes! New generation Africans. The Swedish migrants, they’re all Arabs and blacks almost entirely.

 

And so, yeah, that basically, if you’re a Swedish Zoomer, unfortunately, you’ve probably been raped or bashed by an immigrant or someone you really care about has been raped or bashed.

 

[12:06]

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. So what this graph is essentially showing is you need to experience the reality of diversity before you start not wanting it. So it sounds nice in theory, with all the colorful slogans, the quality, holding hands, smiling, everyone’s getting along, but the reality makes you really don’t want it. And that’s what this graph shows to me.

 

Joel Davis: Wait a second. I know what the Jeet Shaker is now. I remember posting this, actually, on Telegram. There was this guy, he had Indians move into the apartment below him and they were stinking up the place with their curry or making noise. They were doing something to irritate him. They were being rude and obnoxious. I think it was noise.

 

And so he basically rigged up a “Jeet Shaker”, which was this kind of rudimentary, … Don’t remember exactly how he designed it. But basically it was just this heavy object. Yeah, that’s. Yeah, yeah.

 

Basically it would just constantly tap on their roof and he would just run it all day, so they were just constantly irritated and couldn’t sleep. And he called it the “Jeet Shaker”. And he posted the whole story on 4chan, plus like a video of it, and it went viral anyway.

 

Thomas Sewell: Like he would turn it on every time he would leave the house.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, [chuckling] quite funny.

 

But anyway, this data is quite interesting because, yeah, you could say that, yes, Sweden and Germany and France, they have more violent immigrants.

 

But I don’t think it’s just that. I think that it’s something about also the way in which anti-immigration propaganda is marketed in these countries.

 

Like if you look at the Swedish Democrats or the Alternative for Deutschland party in Germany, or the French Right, it’s a lot more youth focused. Whereas here we have One Nation which is just boomer coded. It’s basically appeals to, like, old bogans* or middle aged bogans. It doesn’t have a youthful feel. Everyone in the party is literally a boomer or, like, a really old GenXer. And it’s basically just the same kind of collection of characters that it always has been.

 

[* Bogan is Australian and New Zealand slang for a person whose speech, clothing, attitude and behavior are considered unrefined or unsophisticated. Depending on the context, the term can be pejorative or self-deprecating. The prevalence of the term bogan has also been associated with changing social attitudes towards social class in Australia.

Since the 1980s, the bogan has become a very well-recognized subculture, often as an example of bad taste. It has antecedents in the Australian larrikin and ocker, and various localized names exist that describe the same or very similar people to the bogan. Source: Wikipedia]

 

And we’ve talked about it on the show before about how one of the main problems with One Nation is that they don’t have branches. There’s no way to get involved in the party and work your way up. It’s, like, completely gate-kept. Because if they did allow people to infiltrate the party. Well, I say “infiltrate”, but they allow people to join the party. A bunch of people like us would have infiltrated and probably taking it over by now. So they have to gate-keep it. Pauline Hanson is written into the party constitution, basically, as, like, a dictator over the party.

 

Blair Cottrell: Hasn’t she written her name into the name of the party? So, like, it’s “Pauline Hanson’s One Nation”?

 

So if you do take over, you still got her name in the registered title for the party.

 

[14:57]

 

 

Joel Davis: So if you become a member of One Nation, it doesn’t give you any rights. You basically just sign up to give them money, and they send you a newsletter, and that’s it. There’s no branches. There’s no voting on anything. There’s no consultation, really.

 

I mean, yeah, maybe they might read your emails, but, you know what does that mean? So, basically, there’s no way for enterprising, young, politically minded, savvy, social media savvy young people who understand the culture to get involved in politics and make a name for themselves. Yeah, well, but even we’re kind of radical. Like, even someone who’s more clean cut and optical, like, for example, someone like Jordan Knight, many might have seen him. He runs [words unclear] Yeah, he’s a clean cut young guy who just has the optical talking points and speaks well.

 

Anyway, people like that who were running the parties in Austria, the Freedom Party, which now, like, polling is the biggest party in Austria, and they have re-migration. Like literally deporting immigrants, you know, optically deporting immigrants, back to their home countries on their party platform. So you know, we just don’t have that really here at all! It’s really undersold. There’s clearly a market for Right-wing populism in Australian politics.

 

The other thing is that we have the two party system. So a lot of these European countries, they have Proportional Representation. So basically, it’s easy for smaller parties, like the Greens or One Nation or the UAP [United Australia Party] or whatever, here, to get maybe a Senator, because the Senate is more proportional. But it’s really hard for them to get any seats in the House, because of the way that our system works.

 

Whereas in a lot of these European countries, if you get 5% of the primary vote, then that qualifies you for a certain amount of seats. It doesn’t go by, like, electorate. And that’s similar to how it works in Britain. Obviously, we have the Westminster system.

 

But what’s interesting about what’s happening in Britain, which, with the Reform Party surging in the polls just prior to the election, and that’s got context because obviously the conservative Party installed Rishi Sunak, this brown guy, no one wants to be in charge. Right-wing, patriotic British people don’t want a brown prime minister. It’s embarrassing! It’s fucking, … It’s beyond embarrassing, it’s shameful! So no one wants to vote for him. Obviously, they’re massively unpopular, as is if anyone has been following the situation.

 

And so now there’s a potential opportunity. Farage just announced that he’s gonna join up with the Reform Party. That almost, like, doubled their polling in a matter of weeks. He’s doing these media tours. It’s the biggest story in British politics right now. The election is in, like, four weeks. If they can outperform the conservatives, it’s possible that there’s a scenario where after the next election, the conservative. There’s almost, like, no actual conservative MP’s left. Like, imagine if we had an election and One Nation got, like, 20% of the vote, and the Liberals got, like, 15% of the vote, and then the Labor Party won the election or something, and the Liberals had, like, two people in Parliament and, like, everyone is out of a job.

 

[18:08]

 

That’s potentially a scenario that could happen in Britain where the conservative Party is just obliterated and maybe it never comes back, which would be crazy! So it’s potentially a model there to show that Right-wing populism could, if it was done well, if it was done with the right skill, if it wasn’t Pauline Hanson’s boomer retard show. But it was done with someone that has intelligence, someone that has a youthful marketing strategy to get the young voters on side with some tactical nous, some charisma, and with a kind of updated, more modern style of doing politics, rather than just reproducing the same tiried paradigm, it could work.

 

Blair Cottrell: We need someone who’s willing to give a $20 Superchat, like Harold Flight, who sent us $20. Thanks very much, Harold Flight. He says:

 

“I know it’s off topic, guys, but a marine biologist has discovered a link between sharks and humans. The Great ones are White!”

 

Thomas Sewell: Very funny.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, we have Great Whites down here in Australia, don’t we? I don’t know what you’re insinuating, there.

 

Thomas Sewell: What do you think, Blair, of the collapse of the conservative Party in Britain? Do you think this is a good thing?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Yeah. It’s too lukewarm. It’s boring. It’s not getting anywhere. And conservatives have a tendency to become comfortable in their minister’s chairs, comfortable in their positions. They give the corrupt establishment, or they treat the corrupt establishment with too much legitimacy. They don’t understand that there needs to be a complete overhaul of the entire political system. We can’t keep subscribing to this Parliamentary democracy, which is the reason our countries are in the turmoil they’re in the first place. Right? We can’t use the same method that’s created the problem to solve the problem. Like, if people want to go down that route and try to sort of re-subvert the institutions, I think the kind of resources you’re going to need to effectively do that, it’s unrealistic.

 

However, I don’t necessarily see a clear path for an effective revolution at this stage. Well, it depends on what country we’re talking about.

 

But it’s good to see the conservatives dying out. It’s good to see the conservatives not appealing to what I described as that basic national existentialism before, because they’re not appealing to that. Conservatives are just appealing to arbitrary talking points that don’t really matter. Like, it’s typical of conservatives, as we know, to say:

 

“Oh, you’re Australian as long as you give your vote to an Australian political party, you know, promise to obey Australian laws, then you’re just as Australian as anyone else.”

 

[21:00]

 

That’s bullshit! Because it denies the fundamental essence of what nationality is, which is ethnicity doesn’t just deny it, it just completely ignores it. Like, ethnicity is not even real. How can you go through life, like thinking ethnicity is not real?

 

Everything is downstream from ethnicity. The way we feel, the way we act, the way we communicate, our capacity for culture, creativity, understanding, relating to one another. It all stems from our ethnic core, who we are racially, ethnically, that’s what nationality is.

 

We got another Superchat while I was banging on about that, from White Power, $5, he says:

 

“Would the NSN [National Socialist Movement], EAM making a party, optical or not, be a future endeavor for you guys?”

 

I think he’s asking, would you consider in the future Tom, making a political party to, I suppose what I was just describing. This is what I was just describing. To try to, like, enter into and retake some of our existing institutions. Do you think that’s worth doing?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes it is. There’s two reasons why it’s necessary for us to make a political party in the future. Not at the moment, but in the future.

 

And firstly, is for the legal protection. And if we have enough boots on the ground, if we have enough men in the organization, we will register as a political entity purely to begin with, to just play the game and exercise our political rights. Because we’re currently treated as a borderline criminal organization. The way we’ve been treated with our political demonstrations is like we’re an organized crime gang, like with the bikies, like we’re running drugs and guns and prostitutes. When all we’re doing is saying:

 

“We are White men and we have a political opinion.”

 

And the government treats us basically the same way in terms of its persecution.

 

So I think making a political party would give our activism more legitimacy, and I think that gives it legal protections.

 

And the other reason why I would look at making a political party is actually to increase the platform of our political message. It wouldn’t be necessarily to grab 50% of the vote, although if conditions allow that would be something we would work towards. But I would be more interested in building a political party that wasn’t, … I wouldn’t rebrand NSN or EAM [European Australian Movement] as a political party. I would look at doing something fresh and clean, and I would look at doing it with a fixed purpose.

 

So I think you’ve got to have different horses for different courses.

 

And I think the best way to register the movement that we have and the different types of communities we have, EAM being an active club and community group, NSN being an offensive, agitating, propaganda activist network. To make a political party, it would have to be in a different form. It wouldn’t be in the same form as NSN and EAM. And that’s what’s being brainstormed at the moment. And when we’re ready to, and when we’ve got the numbers, we will deliver on that.

 

But I don’t see that happening this election cycle!

 

[24:11]

 

Joel Davis: I think, in the meantime, it’s good to see, like, I don’t support these Right-wing populist parties, obviously. I don’t believe Pauline Hanson’s One Nation can save Australia. I don’t think Nigel Farage’s Reform Party can save Britain. But I do want to see people who campaign upfront as immigration restrictionists beat conservatives. Because what it does is it shifts politics into a greater level of polarization.

 

So it’s moving the political discourse closer to our entry point. Instead of, I want the political discourse to be arguments about immigration, arguments about nationalism, arguments about race and identity, I don’t want it to be about arguments about economic policy, I don’t want it to be arguments about tax policy. And how are we going to pay for:

 

“How much money are we going to put into the schools and the hospitals?”

 

And all this bullshit! That is the kind of politics that is the luxury of a homogenous White society. When it’s luxury, we don’t have. White people bickering about how best to run the country, and it’s entirely boring and it’s, … Yeah, exactly! It’s a luxury no longer have.

 

I was going to play a video shortly of what the future of the Labor Party. And the future of the Labor Party is the only White people you’re going to see in the Labor Party are going to be faggots, like, literal faggots! Otherwise, you’re not going to be going to be in there. So in, like, 20 years time, that’s going to the Left is polarizing, the Left is getting more and more radical, and it’s impossible for them to reverse course, and the Right needs to go in the same direction.

 

And then in 20 years time, we’re going to have nationalism versus communism as the political paradigm. There’s going to be any conservatism, there’s not going to be any centrism left. There might be people trying to do that, but the centre needs to be vacated.

 

And so the trends that we’re seeing in Europe, and even though Trump is been a massive disappointment, that kind of represented a similar shift, a kind of paradigm shift in American politics, where I remember there was polling done with the day Trump got elected, or around the time that Trump got elected in 2016:

 

“Do you support mass deporting illegal immigrants?”

 

And only 40% of Americans said yes. It was still unpopular even though he just became president. They put a poll out the other day, and 65% of people said, yes.

 

So, you know, he won the argument basically over a decade now. That just seems like milquetoast Right-wing:

 

“That was crazy! Whoa! Mass deporting illegal immigrants. Whoa! What a racist!”

 

And now it’s just kind of seen as like:

 

“Yeah, obviously we should do that. Why not?”

 

And obviously, that’s ridiculous! Obviously, it should be 100%.

 

[26:48]

 

But the point is that you’re seeing a shift in the consciousness. You’re seeing a shift in the radicality of the message, like, Right-wing discourse in general. You know, in 2018, Charlie Kirk was talking about how good gay marriage was and how good immigrants are, and now he’s, like, trying to sound like Nick Fuentes. And that’s a mainstream Right-wing political commentator.

 

We’re seeing a massive vibe shift across the board where the discourse is changing, and now we’re also seeing it start to manifest politically where, like, conservatism is dying. Like, conservatism has a pretty short shelf life in the form that we’ve been accustomed to over the last couple decades. And the Right-wing has to mutate. It won’t become us, but it will have to mutate in our direction. And then we’re going to be fighting fake nationalism versus real nationalism or fake civic nationalism versus ethnic nationalism.

 

Blair Cottrell: As the radical Right becomes cool there’s going to be a stronger effort from established authorities, government, to try to make it illegal. So as it becomes cooler and more popular, more mainstream, so too will certain interested parties, current establishment powers, be trying to associate it with violence more and more so they can justify making it illegal, or certain groups associated with it who are effective. Individuals associated with the radical Right who are effective. I think the government’s going to do its utmost to associate them with violence, to provide justification for censorship, imprisonments.

 

But we just got a $100 Superchat, while we were blabbering on there from Top Three Martingale, $100. Thanks very much! He says:

 

“American Republicans are RHINOs [Republicans in Name Only], not much different than Democrats. We have nobody to help us inside the government. Grassroots revolution feels like the only thing that will bring change.”

 

And also a second $10 from The Shogun. Thanks very much, mate. He says:

 

“Hail victory, boys!”

 

Appreciate it, bro.

 

Joel Davis: But the thing is to get revolutionary conditions, you don’t go from milquetoast, boring kind of conservatism versus this kind of really docile political paradigm, straight to revolutionary conditions. You need a progression. It needs to phase shift.

 

Thomas Sewell: I think the success of, and I mentioned this all the way back when I started Lads Society in 2017 was that, where are the Right-wing suburbs? So this, I’ll repeat his name out here, Top Three Martingale. He says:

 

“A grassroots revolution feels like the only thing that will bring change.”

 

[29:19]

 

And I think grassroots is something that everyone should focus on. In 2017, I commented that you go into the northern suburbs, in the northern suburbs of Melbourne, and it’s like a Leftist hive mind. It’s like all these communist stores, all these communist cafes, all these faggot bars, or like there’s pride flags, every gay flags, whatever you want to call it, everywhere. Like, every street has stickers and posters for the new student union or Marxist thing. They infiltrated institutions, obviously, and I’m not talking about necessarily infiltrating or trying to un-infiltrate those institutions, but we have to think about what kind of institutional power we can build at a grassroots level, what kind of suburbs we can take over. And how does the march of the Right-wing, because everyone knows this. Everyone knows that we know it, our enemies know it. Even the people in the center, even journalists that aren’t specifically Left-wing or Right-wing, they’re saying that there’s a rise in the far-Right, the rise in the far-Right, and they’ve been saying it for 20 years. And they’re not just saying it as a scare tactic to try to encourage the Left to mobilize better. They’re already mobilizing at full steam ahead.

 

It is a factual reality that the far-Right or the pro-Whites, however you want to put it, are on the rise. And how we need to start transforming that energy that we have in these kind of this is like the opposite of grassroots. What we’re looking at here is we’re spokespeople, we’re on the Internet. You’re watching us. You’re consuming this content. This is not grassroots, although we’re grassroots in terms of our personal journeys, in the sense that we’re just everyday men like you, and we don’t have, like, millions of dollars backing us. We need to start thinking about how do we transform this energy where you’re consuming content, into mobilizing. We have to realize that we’re in a political war, and we need to mobilize! We can’t just consume propaganda. Or:

 

“How’s the front line going? Oh, the frontline’s going good. Oh, excellent!”

 

No, we need to actually mobilize politically! And that means voting with our feet, voting with our wallets, changing our lifestyle, engaging in real life with other people that have the same values, and being intolerant of people in institutions that don’t share those values.

 

I could give a million examples, but one that I’ll give you is, I don’t agree with putting kids in daycare, but I know that basically everyone does it. But you should put your kids in a daycare where the people that are looking after the place aren’t waving tranny flags. And if they do wave tranny flags or gay flags, you boycott them. You say:

 

“I’m pulling my kids out. I’m not having them around this faggot shit!”

 

And if all the families did that if you network with other families at the daycare you know, Right-wing daycareism, if you can network with those other families and you can find a daycare or you can find a school or whatever it is that has better values, that what you feed grows!

 

[32:13]

 

So if we take our resources away from these people, these companies will fall, these businesses will collapse, these institutions will lose power. And institutions that are doing the right thing, or at least slightly better things, will gain our energy and our momentum, and that will reinforce itself until the point where it will be normal and mainstream for a lot of institutions to have quite Right-wing and or at least anti-Left wing stances, as protocol, as policy built into the institution itself. And this will help us continue to build momentum in separating society into two camps.

 

And that ultimately is the goal! We cannot be attached to the Left. We cannot be part of a society, a harmonious, loving society with people that want to cut the genitals off children or with people who want to flood our country with refugees, with brown refugees.

 

So we need separation. We need segregation, we need balkanization. We need to start mobilizing our forces in the opposite direction.

 

Joel Davis: There needs to be, as I said, there’s got to be a progression. So, like, absolute intolerance is the goal. We want the average Right-wing White person to be as intolerant as we are of miscegenation, of all kinds of flavors of LGBTQ nonsense, particularly directed at children and so on.

 

But it’s going to require, like, steps. You know, that people aren’t going to just wake up tomorrow and be, like, full on ideological far-Right in everything that they do. I posted on Telegram the other day. We have political, it’s like what I call political Christians, where they don’t even really go to church or whatever, but they support Christian politics.

 

We also have political racists where they’ve got non-White friends, and they hire non-Whites at their business, and they associate with non-White people all the time in their everyday life, and they don’t live any different than an average normie.

 

But then they consume pro-White propaganda on the Internet and maybe vote for a immigration restriction party or something. That isn’t sufficient. It has to become like a lifestyle. You have to stop divesting from as much multiracial society as you can and investing in your people in the way that you conduct yourself on a day to day basis in your workplace.

 

I mean, I understand that if you’ve got a job and you’re working for a corporation, you can’t control that environment, but you need to strive as much as possible to.

 

Blair Cottrell: Intolerance! Intolerance begins on an individual level, doesn’t it? Like anything.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: So you have to, in order to contribute to a national intolerance, you as an individual, need to start becoming more intolerant of things you shouldn’t be tolerating. Stop tolerating disrespect. Stop tolerating speech control in your workplace. Stop tolerating unnecessary levels of bureaucracy, for example. When you become more intolerant as an individual, then so too others around you will feel more comfortable to do the same. And then suddenly, that intolerance is like, I don’t want to say an infection, or a disease, but it spreads. It becomes something that, its taken up or emulated by the surrounding community.

 

[35:51]

 

 

Joel Davis: Except the little things as well.

 

Thomas Sewell: You’re feeding the White blood cells when you look up. There’s a video recently of a guy, I know it’s very kosher, civic nationalism.

 

But there was a guy that got on a plane in America, and he was wearing a MEGA hat, the Make America Great Again hat. And some libtard dumb bitch was just screaming at him and going ballistic and saying that he needs to take the hat off. And he didn’t. And Beck watched this video, and she said:

 

“Why is this woman going so crazy like this?”

 

You know, she obviously is aware of communists and stuff, but she didn’t understand. It just seems so surreal.

 

And I said, my answer to her, which I think a lot of people need to consider is that the Left or the anti-Whites for decades have been wearing their colours on their sleeves. They have been shoving their political views in our face! They have been asserting themselves. You can go all the way back to basically Woodstock. And even before Woodstock, the whole hippie movement, the way they dress, the way they act, the way they talk, everything, their lifestyle, it’s all assertive! They were asserting the whole time they were on the offensive. And the whole time, the conservatives were like:

 

“Oh, yeah, I vote for the Republicans or I vote for the conservative Party.”

 

But, you know what I mean? They don’t wear it on their sleeve. They don’t advertise it. They don’t. They’re not on the offensive in any way. And what Trump really signified in this timeline of politics, shifting back towards our favour, is he started encouraging people to wear it on their sleeve. You know, people were wearing the hat, they’re wearing the MEGA hat. They were like:

 

“Yeah, I’m a Republican.”

 

It’s signaling to everyone else. And that’s so absolutely crucial.

 

And as a Right-wing person or as a pro-White person, everywhere you go to the maximum capacity that you can get away with, you need to wear your views on your sleeve! You need to wear it on your sleeve. That’s why the Nazis wore armbands. They literally wore the swastika on their sleeve. They’re like:

 

“Yep, I’m a Nazi!”

 

Well, obviously, they didn’t say this. I’m a National Socialist. They say:

 

“I’m part of the National Socialist German Workers Party.”

 

[37:51]

 

Blair Cottrell: And you can supercharge that. Yes, you can supercharge that with a little bit of personal pride as well. Like, it’s not a bad thing to lose your temper and stand up for yourself when someone’s showing you disrespect. It’s actually cool. People respect you when you stand up for yourself and refuse to tolerate shit!

 

There was a video I saw recently where couple of young kids walk up to a guy in a gym, let us take his hat off. They’re filming him, trying to get a reaction out of him. He says:

 

“Give me back my hat!”

 

And he slaps this kid open hand, slaps him, he slaps him hard! And the kid gets a real shock and immediately gives the hat back. And they’re like:

 

“Oh, what the hell? What the hell?”

 

They didn’t expect that because they’ve grown up in a ultra pacifist society where they’ve learned that no physical contacts, no standing up for yourself is ever allowed. None whatsoever!

 

And so they’re shocked that this guy actually slapped, slapped one of them. They couldn’t believe it!

 

But the guy looks cool. He’s cool because he stood up for himself. People respect you more sometimes. You don’t necessarily have to lose your temper and blow steam and punch holes in walls. That’s not what I’m saying. But you just need to stand up for yourself and refuse to tolerate disrespect. Like I said, supercharge your views. Whether they’re nationalist, National Socialist, supercharged them with a bit of personal pride.

 

 

Joel Davis: It’s little things as well. Like in your social group.

 

Like if you got friends and they want to go out drinking or they’re having a house party or something, and they’re inviting a homosexual or they’re inviting a non-White, like some black guy or something, just tell them straight out:

 

“No, I’m not coming, because I don’t want to associate with that person. If you want to hang out with me, you’re not hanging out with them.”

 

You know, you might lose some, but fuck them!

 

And then you might win some, and then you’re actually teaching them principles. You’re teaching them hygiene, in how they conduct their personal lives. And that’s going to inspire them to maybe think differently about how they associate with others.

 

And so you don’t understand the kind of chain reaction that you can produce by just simply practicing hygiene in your personal life. If you can’t be a Nazi in your personal life, if you can’t maintain an ethno-state in your own friendship group, in your own family, how, how the hell are you going to do it in a whole country? So e need micro-Nazism before we can do macro-Nazism!

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, everything begins with you as an individual. Right? That’s what we’re coming back to.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: The collective is only a sum of individuals.

 

So the collective is only worth as much as every individual is capable of producing, is capable of so the stronger the individual, the stronger the collective becomes. So making the right choices on a daily basis, it’s all going to contribute to the growth of the collective.

 

So you need to think of it that way. So even though it might feel like:

 

“Oh, I’m going to the gym and fixing my diet up and working out because I want to improve myself.”

 

Without even realizing it, you’re actually feeding the growth of the collective.

 

[40:43]

 

And we’ve got a $50 Superchat again from Top Three Martin Gale. Thanks very much, mate! He asks:

 

“How would you men react if your daughter started dating a black guy?”

 

I mean Tom actually has a daughter, so he’s probably the one who’s going to be most emotionally affected by that question. I’m yet to have a daughter. I’d love to have a daughter. I’d love to have a bunch of daughters, actually. It’s like something I’m really looking forward to.

 

But what do you think, Joel? How would you react to that?

 

Joel Davis: Well, it just won’t happen, so, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But hypothetically, if it did, without Fed posting, have you got any hypothetical response ideas?

 

Joel Davis: Well, no. It’s like, to be my daughter. There’s a standard. Blood and honor! Like, if, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Obviously you wouldn’t raise her to the extent, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. No, it would never happen. But if it did happen, then I would no longer have a daughter.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. I don’t like hypotheticals, but if he wants to get all philosophical, then I understand that life is a schisming force. So I’m sure my brother, so my father is upset about the fact that my brother is gay. And he’s only got two sons, and one is a Nazi and one’s gay.

 

And likewise, I’m sure I’m going to have a lot of children. And if one of them ends up as a degenerate of some form, of any form, it would be sad. I would feel sad! But ultimately, life would go on.

 

So I would do everything in my power to not allow that to happen. But I understand that we are currently in a society where we’re enslaved! And we need to remove that bond, that slavery that’s on us. And there’s a lot of issues within people’s personal lives that actually can’t be resolved because micro issues can’t be resolved sometimes because the macro issue isn’t resolved.

 

So, not to give too many details away, but there’s a situation where there’s a couple getting divorced, and it’s a very messy divorce. And in a healthy society, it would not be a messy divorce. It would be resolved very, very simply and very, very easily. But because the state is so evil, and because the conditions of the state are so evil, and because of the way the courts treat men and just the way the whole society is structured, men aren’t able to get their Patriarchal justice, their Patriarchal rights, as they have for thousands of years.

 

And so what we need to do, most importantly, is overthrow the government and install, in whatever means necessary, a government that is pro-White, pro-patriarchy, and pro-natural law, which is probably is the top down of Patriarchy’s downstream of just natural law.

 

So we need to reassert the racial and natural law concepts that guide our society upwards to the coming man.

 

So that’s the hypothetical. If you want to get technical.

 

[43:54]

 

Joel Davis: Also have a Superchat from Odysee, from GoyBoy1488, who said:

 

“Greetings from the United States. Last show, someone asked if there were any non-Australian shows that were comparable to yours. War Strike with Warren Balogh and Striker is similar, but not the same. Keep up the good work, lads.”

 

Well, Warren Balogh is a man I like. I’ve actually met him in real life. He’s quite a gentleman.

 

Eric Striker is someone I do not like. I never met him in real life, but, yeah, he’s a faggot. So that’s the difference between our show. Our show. I like everyone on the show. Everyone’s cool. But that shows 50% AIDS. So, …

 

Blair Cottrell: , you know what, actually? While you’ve just mentioned that, I’ll bring this up. I realized the other day how special I feel as a result of how nice Joel is to me. Because when you see Joel with other people that he doesn’t know that well, people who aren’t in his circle, he’s not always that nice. You know, he can be pretty dismissive and cold. And I’m thinking, why do I feel so good being around Joel all the time? I’m going to analyze this, and I realized its because he’s so nasty when he doesn’t know, …

 

Joel Davis: Micro-Nazism!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. He doesn’t care about you. Get the fuck away!

 

But when you’re one of his boys, he’s so kind, so empathetic. He’s paying so much attention to you. He’s so tuned into you, and it’s just like, wow! Makes you feel really cared for and special. So I’ve worked you out, bro. I’m on top of it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, it’s micro-Nazism. There’s no value, if you’re a slut and you’re just giving out your, like, charity to just anyone, then you’re just giving away all this energy that you could be giving to people who actually deserve it, who are worth anything.

 

So I just don’t give it to anyone that doesn’t deserve it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, to be intolerant, you got to be intolerant!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s the whole problem with the White race. The White races has become a slut! It’s giving away all of its energy to all these people who don’t deserve it, when we should be focusing it only to the highest grade Aryans and focusing all our energy on uplifting them.

 

And then we’d be having this conversation on Mars right now because we would have already built this, like, super advanced technological civilization. We’re doing Star Trek shit! But because of egalitarianism, because of yeah, all the values, … Yeah, we are now sitting on Rumble, you know. Counting, …

 

[46:28]

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m surprised the amount of views, engagement, Superchats we get through Rumble. Rumble’s awesome! Like, it’s almost comparable to YouTube. Like, we’re getting more views on Rumble than we used to get on YouTube, surprisingly.

 

But we’ve been at this for a while. There’s a consistency now. You’ve done a lot of networking and appearances on other shows and stuff, so I’m sure all that’s contributed to the growth of the show.

 

But I’m just putting it out there that I’m impressed with Rumble. Like, the engagement’s great! The website works great, too. Faster than Odysee.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. The jews who run Rumble are doing a good job.

 

Blair Cottrell: So is it actually jews running Rumble? Is that true?

 

Joel Davis: Jews run everything? Of course!

 

Blair Cottrell: Uh, but we’ve gotta steal some of that industrious, …

 

Joel Davis: You know, they’re trying to use us to help grow their platform and then once they get big enough, they’ll probably cast us aside.

 

So, you know, make hay while the sun shines!

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, we got $5 while I was speaking just then from Fellow Comrade. Says:

 

“If Tom didn’t get the $2 from the last week’s Superchat, he’s considering legal action.”

 

That was for the door fund Tom. But I don’t think your door needs replacing. So put that money aside, I suppose, and it can go towards replacing the next door that the police kick down. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I want to play this video, actually. I did post it on, so people who follow me on social media probably saw it did go get passed around, but we just need to react to it. Here we go.

 

—————

Indian woman: Of course we’re going to take you to Canberra for the Federal Budget.

Indian man: We’re at the Labor Club. Of course. We get our coffees from the Parliament with Labor Club.

White man: We are Labor Club, of course we are going to make you meet MPs and Ministers.

Indian woman: We’re the Labor Club. Of course we will discuss and debate policies.

White woman: We’re the Labor Club, of course we are pragmatic, progressive and principled.

Indian woman: We are the Labor Club, of course we’re going to deliver the best events.

Indian woman: We’re the Labor Club, of course we there’s a space for everyone.

————————

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s going on there?

 

Thomas Sewell: What the fuck?

 

Joel Davis: That’s a recruiting video for a Young Labor.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you see the guy start walking, like, awkwardly? Like, he started walking too late when the camera rolled. It’s like they were like, now. And he was like. [chuckling] But everyone in that video had a foreign accent, I think, except one guy who, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Who’s obviously a faggot.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. So, wow! Future of the Labor Party is looking a bit bleak. But hey, …

 

[48:54]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s awesome! My initial reaction is frustration, but then when I kind of zen out a bit, I realized, this is good. This is very good! This is all going to plan. Excellent! Excellent! Like, this is so stupid. This is the worst thing that these people could be doing right now. And it’s what they’re doing.

 

So, yeah, the fire rises! Yes. Chaos ensues.

 

Blair Cottrell: They cannot help. They can’t tap into the consciousness of the average Australian worker because they’re so far removed from the average Australian worker. They grow up seeing nothing but the four walls of a classroom and doing nothing but trying to appeal to their Marxist Professors.

 

And so, yeah, they’re never going to understand how to appeal to the masses.

 

But, yeah, like you said, …

 

Joel Davis: They’ve built their ideology on miscegenation, upon multiculturalism. Yeah, exactly! So you attract what you are. So there’s not normal young Whites. The thing is the Liberal Party isn’t too far behind.

 

Thomas Sewell: More pajeets in the Liberal Party. Like darker ones.

 

Joel Davis: Yes. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why in Australia, why don’t we have like, a solid Right-wing party? They have them in America. We don’t even have like, Right-wing corporations here. Like in America, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, they haven’t come out of the woodwork yet. There are a lot of people with resources,

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s true.

 

Thomas Sewell: With our politics, but they haven’t come out of the woodwork yet because it’s a chicken and egg situation. They’re waiting for a winning horse and we’re waiting for the funds to build a winning horse. So we’re slowly, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Someone’s got to jump the gun. Someone has to go first.

 

Thomas Sewell: Chicken, egg. Chicken, egg.

 

Blair Cottrell: Someone’s got to go first. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, we are, we’re getting there. It’s moving slowly. It’s moving slowly. It’s just not moving as fast as people, as we would like, because we’re doing this every day.

 

But if you’re checking in once a week or you check it in once a month, probably looks like it’s moving pretty quick.

 

Blair Cottrell: But it’s understandable why there’s like, hesitation because this is new territory now, culturally, socially, no one wants to throw millions of dollars down the drain. I mean in the past, a lot of influencers online got pretty big and they made a lot of money and just bailed! Right? Now, no one cares about them anymore.

 

Thomas Sewell: Look at Milo*, like he extorted hundreds of thousands of dollars out of people and then just, …

 

[* Milo Yiannopoulos (né Hanrahan; born 18 October 1984) is a British far-Right political commentator. His speeches and writings criticize Islam, feminism, social justice, and political correctness. Yiannopoulos is a former editor of Breitbart News, an American far-Right news and opinion website. Source: Wikipedia]

 

Blair Cottrell: Allegedly, yeah. I don’t know how much it was exactly.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well. He spent a lot of people’s monies on Gucci handbags and not on what he said he was going to spend it on. So.

 

Blair Cottrell: We’re all talking at the same time! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: What I was saying was that we’re all young guys in our thirties. So early thirties, you know.

 

Joel Davis: Hey, I’m not in my early thirties!

 

Thomas Sewell: What are you, 30? 29?

 

Joel Davis: No.

 

Thomas Sewell: What are you, 29, 28?

 

[51:57]

 

Joel Davis: 29. Let me hold on to my 20s while I still got it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Okay, well, you’re 30 this year probably. Or next year.

 

Joel Davis: It sucks, man.

 

Blair Cottrell: Enjoy it.

 

Thomas Sewell: 29, 31, and what’s Blair, 34. So we’re young guys, and we have all been doing this for some time. But again, it’s all about trust. People aren’t going to put a huge amount of resources on the table until there’s trust and there’s proof that you can deliver on that trust. As much as we hate, I hate money, I hate that side of politics, and I hate that side of what we’re doing.

 

But ultimately, resources come with time, and resources come with trust. And when we can deliver and prove on what we’re building and producing, there’s going to be more people coming to the table.

 

But also we need more support. Boots on the ground from the community. We need more people attending community meetings. We need more people involved. They don’t have to get involved in activism, they don’t have to get involved in physical training. There is just a community that’s being built, and there’s many communities. It’s not just what I’m doing. There are many communities being built and you can network with them through the Internet. But ultimately you have to get off the Internet and get engaged. Boots on the ground! And then when all the communities are growing, all these different ones, 50 guys here, 100 guys here, 50 guys here, it all adds up.

 

And then you can start looking at those communities coming together for a purpose, like registering a political party or registering as an ethno-religious group or an ethnic group, and start creating legal protections for our identity and our culture. Challenging things at a legal level.

 

So there’s a multifaceted approach to politics. You know, like, if we had a thousand men in the room. We don’t have a thousand men in the room. But if we had a thousand men in the room, our options are almost endless. We’ve got all the ideas.

 

We could make a Right-wing, or a pro-White version of the SPLC, the Southern Poverty Law Center in the United States, which is like a big jewish law firm that helps black rapists get off and helps prosecute White people that say racist things. And we could do it the other way around. We could fund lawyers to support White races and also to pressure the government into re-sentencing black rapists and get political victories. You know, if we had a thousand men in a room and one movement lawyer or two movement lawyers, we could look at things like that.

 

But again, that all comes with time. But it’s not just time. It’s time and energy. It’s time and energy! We can’t change time. Time is what it is. And every year we need to move closer and closer to our goals.

 

And the only way to get there is man hours, manpower, resources, energy, time under tension. We got to get guys out of their comfort zones and get them somewhere, wherever it is. In the gym, in the legal discussions, in the whatever it is, whatever your strength is, IT, it doesn’t matter.

 

But when you’ve got a thousand men in the room, there’s got to be at least ten or 20 that’s fucking competent at somethings that can help build the movement up.

 

[54:58]

 

Joel Davis: We’ve got a massive advantage.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s great to see some of the younger guys that are, you know, associates of yours, Tom, or just in the community, generally get into the gym, even though they don’t have a lot of knowledge. They’re just starting out. They’re still there. They’re still putting themselves out there. I mean, it takes guts to actually put yourself in a position or to try something that you’re not an expert in, that you are just a beginner in, and you don’t even know what you’re doing.

 

Like, as a man, it takes guts to do that. And I appreciate the young guys that actually throw themselves out there and are willing to learn. You got to have that willingness to learn, I suppose, in order to progress in any field.

 

But we’ve got a double Superchat here on Rumble. Double $10, 20 in total from Smarty 98. He’s got a bit of a question for us. It’s:

 

“Do you think the democratic system is set up so that, for example, in the UK, Nigel Farage will become the new conservative Party and the conservatives and Labour team up as a centrist party block and then bam, we’re back to a two party system?”

 

So I’ll just read that last part again so we’re not confused:

 

“Nigel Farage UK will become the new conservative Party and the conservatives and Labor will team up as a centrist party bloc, and then we’re back to a two party system. Then eventually they will all drift left and then there will be a new far-Right outflanking Farage, and the process repeats itself again.”

 

It’s a pretty …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Yes. In short.

 

Blair Cottrell: That would be the ideal, I think would be the ideal situation for the current, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Joel, you muted.

 

Joel Davis: Am I unmuted now?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, you’re good now.

 

[56:42]

 

Joel Davis: I said that would be the ideal situation because then that just moves the flank. And we’re obviously on the flank of the flank. So we want the Overton to shift. We want greater and greater polarization. We want the center to vacate and so we want these repositionings to occur.

 

Like if in Australia, if the One Nation party gobbled up the Right-wing vote, I don’t think this would happen. But let’s just say for argument’s sake, and the Liberal Party just collapsed or made a coalition with the Labor Party and they teamed up to become the new opposition or something that would shift everything to us.

 

And then us attacking the One Nation party from the Right all of a sudden becomes way more politically viable because now they are the new center-Right and everything has shifted rightward. So we want to see this action happen more.

 

But also it’s good to see the Left shifting further Left as well. Like that video that I just played, I want the Labor Party to have a non-White leader. I want White Australians to feel alienated!

 

Thomas Sewell: Gay! Gay, non-White leader!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: Transsexual, non-White leader!

 

Blair Cottrell: Don’t you think that it might be a little bit, how should I say, debilitating, damaging to the spirit of the Australian people?

 

Joel Davis: Then they’re going to see us with White faces or people that represent our views with White faces and then they go:

 

“Those are the only people I can identify with.”

 

Blair Cottrell: As long as there’s an active counterpart is there, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: Then only actually aiding our selling, sort of channeling more power to us.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Joel Davis: The system is going like full accelerator pedal into becoming as brown and gay as quickly and rapidly as possible. And we have a very apolitical population. Like in America where they have a very political population and there’s all of these enterprising young White guys in suits they can keep wheeling out, even the Democrats can still produce them somehow.

 

Whereas here we don’t have that kind of conveyor belt. And it’s absolutely fantastic that we don’t, because want people to be looking around like:

 

“Wait a second. What happened to all the normal people? Like, why is it just like the freak show now? Why is politics a freak show all of a sudden?”

 

It used to be like this kind of, yeah, they were like politicians were more nerdy than people on average, or a little more lame than people on average. But it kind of was a snapshot of, you know what you would expect when you went into any business and you went to like a, a corporate meeting. The kinds of faces and voices that you’d see there were the same that you see on the television.

 

Blair Cottrell: The Australian elite class, the political class has put circus grotesqueries out of business! [chuckling] Because the real grotesquery is just Parliament now. The real grotesquery is just Australian social life. No longer do you need to go to a circus and pay $2 to see the freak show. Just go outside to your local shopping center and have a look around. Right?

 

But from White Power we have $5 donation, again. Thanks very much, mate. Asking me:

 

“What’s the best way to get started in the gym?”

 

There’s a bit to unpack there, but you just don’t overthink it. That’s the best advice I could give for anyone who’s actually really beginning and not sure what to do. Don’t overthink it. It’s not rocket science. Get in there and move the weights, learn the movement, learn your body. It’s not that difficult. And once you get into the gym, half the work’s already done.

 

Yeah. I’m sorry to interrupt. Let’s continue.

 

[1:00:03]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: Get a sweat as well. Get a sweat. Everyone’s got to get a sweat. A lot of guys go to the gym, a lot of beginners, and they don’t get a sweat. They go there and they just mumble around, mosey around. Low energy, low vibration.

 

Blair Cottrell: You have to go intense.

 

Thomas Sewell: You gotta go in there, get on the treadmill, or get on the step machine, get on the rower. Five minutes, ten minutes. Go hard! Even if you’re spastic, just go hard! And then start doing push ups. Start doing pull ups. Start! You know, just do full body squats, bench press, shoulder press, lap, pull down, everything. You know what I mean? Just as a young guy, as a beginner, do everything! Doesn’t matter. You can’t go wrong.

 

Blair Cottrell: I trained with a young guy just yesterday, just last night, like, a guy who’s about 19. I think it was one of his first sessions, and it really reminded me of myself when I was younger. Because he had a similar frame to me when I started, and it reminded me that I used to not even be able to balance the bar on bench press. Like, I couldn’t push it directly up. I would almost kind of drop it over my head and stuff.

 

Because, you know, that’s where everyone starts, almost like, it’s not, … Everyone’s a genetic sort of abnormality. How do you say abnormality? He goes into the gym and just has some sort of, like genetic predisposition to weightlifting. Like, the average person starts off quite weak. The average person needs to build up stabilizer muscles.

 

So, yeah, don’t be scared to get in there and just give it a crack. Like, just get moving, man! Get in there and, like Tom says, get that sweat happening.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. And you’ll learn with time, but you just got to do every machine. Every machine, every exercise. Just do it all.

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel’s been going well at the gym. Joel’s been going really well at the gym. How you finding it, Joel? Do you enjoy it?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, sure. I like fighting better, though, but, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I can tell you do. You’re probably more geared towards that, to be honest. Like, weightlifting is kind of almost easy for you, I’ve noticed. Like, you’re sort of still having conversation in between sets and stuff, because for you, it doesn’t seem as challenging as a good fight does. But you like to fight. Like, you like to argue as well. So that comes out in you, in the way you deal with people.

 

[1:02:12]

 

Joel Davis: But I’ve been enjoying it. I’ve been enjoying trying to, like, keep making improvements and beat whatever I did last week or the week before. And the numbers gradually, like, going up and up little by little each, each week or two. It feels good to keep trying to unlock that next level and then thinking like:

 

“Oh, I’ve got it!”

 

Like, when I the other day I went to get a burrito, and I was like, I’m getting two burritos. You know what I mean? Like, I got to bulk. It just feels good to be just expanding, you know? I just feel like I’m growing. I’m just expanding as, like, as a human. Becoming more imposing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, absolutely!

 

Joel Davis: A little bit more aura. Like, I walk around and under my shoulders are back more, and I’m just kind of thicker and people are looking at me a little different. So I like that. I like that feeling. You definitely want to get as big as possible.

 

For the people at home, particularly if you live in Melbourne. You want to be able to intimidate niggas. You want niggas to be like, … You want to be a Whiteman, be a Viking, a Whiteman walking down the street, like I’m a fucking Anglo Saxon bitch, you know?

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly! Preach!

 

Joel Davis: You want the browns cowering. You want the niggas taking a step back. You want to walk at a nigger and he takes a step to the side as you walk by blair Cottrell: What you’re saying, might sounds vulgar but it holds merit.

 

Joel Davis: It’s your fucking land!

 

Blair Cottrell: It definitely holds merit, what you’re saying, because when they see a big guy, when they see a strong guy, like people from Africa, and that, they associate that with a high level of violence, and so they respect that! Because violence is actually all they respect! You know, some of these, especially young African immigrants, the only thing they understand, the only thing I respect is violence.

 

And if you look like you’re capable of a lot of that violence, all you got to do is look the part. Yeah. They won’t be messing with you.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Everyone should get as big as they can and still remain functional. That’s my opinion. You should max out your frame. You should absolutely max out what God has given you and still be able to move. Yeah, I don’t recommend [word unclear] If you can.

 

Joel Davis: Blair’s been trying to, like, he’s trying to encourage me to start taking steroids, but I’m resisting.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s not true! I said:

 

“If you did take them.”

 

Theoretically.

 

[1:04:24]

 

Joel Davis: :

 

“Oh, like, Joel, like, imagine if you took steroids, how, like, you could look like a God and everyone would, … You’d be 10% and, 20% more, because you’d be so Chad!”

 

Blair Cottrell: I think in past times, I would have been a mad, …

 

Joel Davis: Imagine if I just blew up to, like, Blair Cottrell size, and then it’s just I’m just like Blair Cottrell 2. Like it would just become ridiculous!

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, yeah, yeah, but really, I probably just want to like see what happens to you. Like I think I would have been one of those mad scientists that like built Frankenstein’s with pharmacology experiments like in times before this time, just to see what happens. Like I’m really curious to see how someone’s like kind of biological genetics will react to certain compounds. I’m actually shattered that I can’t do that, but maybe I should have joined the medical, …

 

Thomas Sewell: When you get as big as Blair, it takes about a decade to understand the power. You know, with great power comes great responsibility. And Blair has taken at least a decade to be able to cultivate that ego and control it and master it.

 

And Joel, if Joel got as big as Blair within like a twelve month period, Joel would go off the rails! There would be a redemption arc, but it would be like. Yeah, it would be a very Appollian, or whatever it’s called.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well the bigger you get, the ego, …

 

Joel Davis: I want functional balls, so, …

 

Blair Cottrell: The ego lives in the body Joel.

 

Thomas Sewell: Joel I think your Mike has changed. When your mic cut out before, you sound different. Now you sound. It’s harder to hear you, it’s less clear. I think your mic setting changed to your computer mic.

 

Joel Davis: Oh.

 

Blair Cottrell: While you figure it out, the ego lives in the body. I tell people this. So the bigger the body gets, the bigger the ego can get.

 

And so that’s a mental challenge. You always have to maintain ego control. Sometimes when you hear that inner dialogue, whispering things to you, like that person’s looking at you funny, you know, you’re comparing yourself to someone, you’re getting negative feedback. Yeah. Like you gotta understand that that voice isn’t always you! That voice is your ego talking to you need to differentiate yourself from your ego. That’s a good way to practice ego control. It works for me anyway. That’s the method I used personally.

 

How’d you go with your mic, Mr Davis?

 

Joel Davis: I think we’re back.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, that’s much better. So what’s next on the agenda?

 

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, I was just basically my main agenda was just talking about, yeah, these election results and how best or how to interpret them. Because there’s a School of thought that like:

 

“Oh, it’s. Everything is just an op by the jews to like subvert us and like there’s smoke and mirrors.”

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, that’s lazy. It’s so lazy.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. It’s such a reductive framework, …

 

[1:07:16]

 

Thomas Sewell: Obviously jews have a lot of power, but that, … What’s the correct term for that? Not White Fragility. It’s like White defeatism. It’s like a complete demoralization. Like, we’re not capable:

 

“Oh, if you do this, they’ll shut it down! If you do that, they’ll shut it down!”

 

It’s like, just fucking do it! Just try! Just do your best! Just move it in the direction, …

 

Joel Davis: What it is, …

 

Thomas Sewell:

 

“Oh, I can’t go to the gym!”

 

It’s like the same as the incel logic. Like:

 

“Oh, I can’t get a girlfriend because of the jews!”

 

It’s like, fuck you! Shut up! Shut your mouth. Your little fucking sperg! They shouldn’t have the right to speak. People that say things like that, they should be starved of oxygen.

 

It’s like Hitler in the trenches bashed people when they were like:

 

“I don’t think Germany’s gonna win!”

 

He’s like:

 

“Fuck you!”

 

And he bashed them. He’s like:

 

“Germany’s gonna win!”

 

Even if Germany didn’t win, it doesn’t., … You’re definitely gonna lose if you got that attitude.

 

If you’re like:

 

“I’m never going to get a girlfriend!”

 

Then you’re never going to get one. You’re never going to get one with that attitude. You know, it’s like:

 

“Oh, we’re never going to get our country’s back!”

 

Not with that attitude:

 

“We’re never going to win anything!”

 

Oh, we’re not with that attitude. So just shut up! Shut up and win!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Shut up and let the guys winning win. And support the men at the front that are fighting, that are winning. If you can’t be a fighter because you’re a little bitch, that’s what God made you. At least support the men that are fighting.

 

Blair Cottrell: And lose well until you win.

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: Approaching those girls. Keep trying, keep fucking trying. Keep failing.

 

And then eventually you win, right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Get a gym, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s what I told one of the boys in the group chat the other day. He was talking about his struggles getting a girlfriend. And I said:

 

“Just, just keep approaching cute girls at the supermarket, okay? Maybe 99 of them don’t give you their number, but eventually one of them will just date you.”

 

Then you can just have babies with her and everything will be fine. People say:

 

“Oh, it’s not that easy.”

 

But they haven’t approached 100 girls at the supermarket. None of you have!

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly!

 

Joel Davis: No one has done that. So you. It actually is that easy, probably. I don’t know. I haven’t done it, frankly, I wouldn’t need 99 girls! [chuckling]

 

[1:09:15]

 

Blair Cottrell: But, you know, mathematically. Mathematically you’re going to get some sort of result. But do you have the emotional control to deal with what is probably going to be 97 out of 100 rejections? I mean maybe it’s not going to be that bad, actually. Maybe I’m being a bit cynical, but, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Men need to know where they’re punching. Like, we live in this world where men and women are incompatible or struggling with their compatibility because they’re both looking for nines and they’re not realistic with what they are. All the women are like:

 

“Oh, my God! The guy that just approached me, he’s like a six.”

 

And it’s like, well, you’re probably a six, if a six is approaching you, or you’re probably not far off a six, you know?

 

And likewise, there are men that jus shoot their shot, and it’s like:

 

“You just wasted that! It was dumb.”

 

You know, you should just start at a comfortable level and build up your confidence. And you can build that up by just talking to women that you’re not actually attracted to. Every time you go get your fucking McHappy meal or whatever you get, you should be talking to the girl. You don’t have to try to grab her attention, but you should at least try to make some discourse other than:

 

“One Big Mac, please!”

 

You got to build up your tolerance.

 

Blair Cottrell: Build your Riz man. Become a Risley bear.

 

But I think we got, we got a few Swedish viewers. We’ve had a $20 Superchat from Gustavus Varsa. Thanks very much for the $20. He asks, based on Joel’s, … I think it’s he, anyway:

 

“Based on Joel’s recent tweet about Swedish Zoomers, will he now confess and explain how epic the Swedish are compared to a previous statement and that he would gladly come back to Sweden and hold a seminar.”

 

What do you reckon, Joel Davis?

 

Joel Davis: Did I talk shit about Swedes at some point? Maybe I did. No, but I’ve been to Sweden, okay? I’m allowed to have an opinion. I like Swedes. Swedes are cool. Swedes are fucking, they’re eugenic as fuck! They’re Aryan as fuck, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Small noses. Compared to us they have small noses. Have you noticed? Like, we have these big Australian konks, Gonzo noses, …

 

Joel Davis: Big noses are aristocratic, so it’s an L for Sweden.

 

But it’s okay, we, you got a small nose. You’re all, like, beautiful! So you can have a small nose.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think small noses are nice on women. But I don’t think, like, it depends how big we’re talking. But, like, a big prominent nose can sometimes, like a Roman sort of nose, you know? I think that kind of is aesthetic for men, personally. Maybe I’m just coping.

 

[1:11:45]

 

Joel Davis: No, you want a big schnoz. I think, obviously, people say:

 

“Oh, jewish. Like, big nose equals jewish!”

 

No! There’s a different shape on a jew nose. It’s a different, it’s a whole different kettle of fish. But thing is, on Swedes, I like Swedes. They need to learn how to banter. They don’t understand banter. It’s like, I don’t know what it is. Like, Anglos, we understand banter, but Swedes, they need to learn to bance!

 

And so I was probably, I was probably bantering, and a Swede read this and was like:

 

“Oh, man! Like, he has the wrong opinion. Like, how could he think this?”

 

You know, just, it’s just banter.

 

Like, obviously I’m a racist. Obviously, I like Sweden. Sweden is, it’s pure, pure Nordic genes. Everyone is very lovely and sweet, and yeah, obviously it’s good to see.

 

I mean, I marched with the Nordic Resistance Movement when I was in Sweden. Great bunch of guys. Had a good time. I support the movement over there and, yeah, Swedish friends. So I’m with you guys.

 

I mean, we’re all in this together! That’s the thing. I’m race first. Like, I’m race before nationality, in the sense that, like, a high quality, spiritually aware Aryan who’s from Sweden or Germany or America, I have more in common with than just some random White Australian. So I care about the top class Whites of the whole world, more than I care about any particular national group.

 

And so, because that’s the essence of our entire civilization, those are the people that drive forward human greatness. And so that’s who I’m principally loyal to.

 

But then, obviously, we have to maintain all of our nations. But the struggle in every White country is important.

 

Blair Cottrell: I noticed [word unclear] was up in Sweden lately. Him and Marcus Follin [The Golden One] got together and did some workouts and offered some advice to their viewers. And that was cool to see. Like, Sweden’s a beautiful country. Like, I would love to see it one day. I don’t know if I ever will.

 

But we got $10 while you were speaking there from 65Stoney. Thanks very much, mate. He says:

 

“Australia, by far, still probably has the best chance boys. The White Australia Policy was only about 50 years ago. We are a new nation, and Australia is still 80 or 90% White, I think.”

 

Joel Davis: It’s not 80 or 90% White. It’s about officially 72% White. Something like that. 70, 72% White.

 

And last year, we just got the official statistics. Uh, this is, by the way, I should probably pull this up because this is the Noticer article that was just published. Everyone Noticer.news. That’s the only place to get your news:

 

“Australia allowed in a record 751, 500 immigrants in 2023, new official figures show.”

 

And how many of them were White? Fuck all!

 

So, yeah, population grew by 2.5%, and that’s a mostly brown 2.5% anyway. Absolutely disgusting!

 

And then whatever they say the immigration intake is, it’s always more. And they always say the net intake, they don’t tell you that about 100 something thousand White Australians basically leave the country and move somewhere else every year.

 

So they give you the net intake. We took 500,000, but they subtract everyone that left. So you’re getting browner than the number suggests because you’ll be mostly losing Whites and taking non-Whites.

 

Anyway. Sorry to black pill, but it’s just reality. We need to come to terms with it.

 

[1:15:37]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: No, it’s not a black pill. We got to be realistic about what’s going on. There’s a few Superchats that I can read out on Odysee. GoyBoy:

 

“Greetings from the US. Last show, someone asked if there were any non-Australian shows.”

 

Oh, sorry. You read that one out. 1488 White Rabbit radio:

 

“Great show, guys, as always. Joel, be on with me today at 05:00 pm Eastern Standard Time, US.”

 

Joel Davis: Today? It’s tomorrow.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, he’s saying you’re going to be on. You’re going to be on in nine and a half hours is what he’s saying.

 

Joel Davis: I thought I agreed to a Saturday show or, like, Friday US time. Saturday my time. How am I going to do that?

 

Blair Cottrell: I do that all the time as well.

 

Thomas Sewell: Just messaging. Because he might have said Eastern standard time to you. And you must have thought that was our Eastern standard time, because they also have one. $20 from White Bracer:

 

“Greetings from Canada. Love what I’m hearing, but I need your help. My friend Sleeves is black pilled. Please snap him out of it.”

 

Well, I’ll do this quickly.

 

Basically, you have two options. You fight for the White race, you fight for our survival in some way, shape, or form, or you just kill yourself. Like, why do people need to be snapped out of being black pilled? Like, just stop being a faggot. It’s not hard. Like, what are you doing here on earth? Why are you here? Like, you’ve got this gift of life. You wake up every morning, the world is your oyster. You know, if you’re in a living situation that you’re not happy with, it’s probably more that than politics. You’re probably just not happy with your living situation.

 

This is where I kind of agree with the Leftoids in a way. Like, you have the ultimate privilege. Yeah, we’re being genocided, but the Left are correct in the sense that we have White privilege. You can just get up from where you are right now if you live in Canada or the United States or Australia, you can just get up and move anywhere you want in Europe, in the non-White world, if you wanted to gentrify a section of that, there’s little expat colonies everywhere.

 

You can go anywhere you want on six months worth of savings, working a shit job, and do whatever you want for probably six months. You can do a working holiday. You can meet new people. You can read books. You can develop your personal identity in solitude. It’s endless! It’s literally infinite. And you’re gonna sit there and be black-pilled. Fuck you! I hate you! You’re a piece of shit! You’re destroying, like, you basically deserve to kill yourself.

 

I just have no sympathy for it anymore because our struggle is so immense. We’re at war. We’re all suffering. Just get with it! Get with the fucking program. Piece of shit!

 

[1:18:13]

 

Blair Cottrell: Brutal! Brutal!

 

Thomas Sewell: Hail Hitler.

 

Blair Cottrell: If you’re a man, sue, speaking of, …

 

Joel Davis: Speaking of Hitler, Chain Reaction put this in the chat. He said, this is a Hitler quote:

 

“He who would live must fight. He who doesn’t wish, …”

 

Blair Cottrell: You cut out. But I know the quote.

 

Joel Davis: :

 

“Permanent struggle is the law of life.”

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Joel Davis: :

 

“Has not the right to exist.”

 

Thomas Sewell: Joel, I think your Internet is, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, your Internet. A bit bouncy, man. This is my favorite quote. Yeah, I was saying, you’re a man, right? You’re a man. You’re black pilled, but you’re a man! Do you know how strong you can get if you apply yourself? And you know how good it feels to be that strong? I mean, I wake up every day just like a bottomless pit of self confidence!

 

But no, you just. He’s gone completely now.

 

So we’re having problems with Joel here, so I’ll just, like us, skim over the subject and basically just say, if you apply yourself, you can not know yourself. You won’t realize what you’re capable of until you try. Until you get up every day, apply yourself and try! And just start with the gym. Start with something small that benefits you, seemingly on an individual basis, but it will then extend into other areas. You’ll develop mental discipline. You’ll develop self pride, a strong sense of self worth. Then you’ll want to expand that worth more, or channel that worth into something that’s greater than you. Right?

 

So you start small on yourself. You grow. You work a way out of that self pity. Because despair is self pity! You’re feeling sorry for yourself. You’re keeping yourself in that position. Your greatest challenge is you! You’re your greatest enemy, if you’re dealing with black pill, melancholy, depression. And there’s no other way to look at it, really, you’ve just got to start not liking yourself for the way you are and doing something about changing your position.

 

Fellow Comrade loves a Superchat. This guy loves a Superchat. Another $5:

 

“Tom should grow, …”

 

Maybe actually, I’m not going to read that one out. I’m not going to read that one out because I feel it’s beneath Tom. It’s just a it’s a shitty little comment, and it’s only $5. Thanks for the donations.

 

[1:20:40]

 

Joel Davis: What do you mean Tom should grow sideburns? He has a whole beard!

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s been read out now. So, Thomas should grow, … I think you’ve got sideburns already. I think he has sideburns already. This reminds me of that Simpsons episode where, …

 

Joel Davis: Sideburns come down, like. Yeah, it doesn’t make any sense. It’s just a retarded premise.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I don’t know. Yeah, let’s keep our questions a little bit more worthy.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, just low IQ.

 

Blair Cottrell: But how’s that Internet going? How’s that Australian Internet connection?

 

Joel Davis: I think maybe it’s better now. Yeah.

 

So, yeah, I don’t know. Mossad is fucking with me, boys. I was trying to read out a Hitler quote, and then it just they just went:

 

“No, shut it down!”

 

But seriously, I mean, I’m sure you guys already covered it pretty well, but basically the essence of why being black pilled is fucking gay is. So, like, what do you mean? Like, you’re just gonna stop being racist? Like, you’re just gonna become, like, a fucking. You’re just gonna start, like, loving niggas all of a sudden? You’re just gonna like that. Like what? Like, what does that even mean? If people say:

 

“Oh, I don’t really believe in a political solution.”

 

It’s like, okay, but, like, who are you as a person? Like, what are your values? Like, you just got to abandon your values because society doesn’t conform to them. Like, that just makes you a cuck! Like, you should just go down swinging. Like, even if the black pill is 100% true, still be true to yourself! Like, I would rather die for the swastika than live a fucking communist. You know what I mean?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. A lot of these people that are black pill, it is just temporary. And as you said even if you think there’s no political solution, well, is there a personal solution?

 

Is there a way you can cope with living in this world but maintain your values and your honor? Yes, there is! So do that. And then think, is there a family solution? Is there a community solution? Can I associate with people that have the same principles as me?

 

So now we’re building grassroots revolution. Now we’re building the foundations of a future society.

 

So it’s very slow, but it’s very steady. It’s very steady because it’s your life. When it’s your life, it’s different. You can’t be black pilled when it’s your life. And if you’re doing too much, which some activists are, they’re doing more than what they’re capable of sustaining. And that’s why we have something called burnout. And people need to be able to identify the difference between being black pilled and being burnt out.

 

A lot of people just burn out. And it’s because you constantly watch the hate porn. You’re constantly watching, like, White people getting beat up on Telegram or Twitter. Like, you’re just burnt out. Like, you just need to get off fucking the Internet for a week at a time, maybe even longer, maybe a month at a time, and just fucking do something else with your life.

 

[1:23:23]

 

Blair Cottrell: Bench press.

 

Thomas Sewell: And do some bench press, do some push ups, and go for a walk, touch grass, all that cliche, Platonic shit! And then you can digest what you’re consuming. If you’re constantly consuming, then you have no ability to digest it and incorporate it into your sense of self, you know?

 

Joel Davis: So digesting is an important point. I was talking to Blair about this last night when we were having dinner. And I was saying that when I see these anti-White hate crimes, whatever, I tried to really just take a moment and just imagine, like, play through the scenario in my mind and imagine what it would be like if it was my grandma or my sister or something like that and just, and just sit there and feel it. Because I want to use that motivation. I want to take it personally. Every time, every time I get the opportunity to, I want to take something like that personally and internalize it and use it and then turn that into fire within to keep motivation, to keep going in what I’m doing.

 

Because, and the thing is also, like, there’s all these videos, like blacks will see me on Twitter and they’ll DM me some video of some, you know, black bashing a White. I don’t dignify it with a response, but sometimes I just want to send them, like, one of the reverse videos because I do try to cultivate a library of White W fight videos as well. Because you got to, like, gee up. You’ve got to see the Whiteman getting his own back. You got to internalize that and feel that and feel the power as well. Your heart’s got to break for the White race, but then you’ve also got to, like, energize for the White race. Like, watch The Sun of Rededit [sp], watch the Nuremberg Rally. Watch Hitler’s speeches and just feel the energy.

 

It’s so important to be actively cultivating inspiration for yourself in order to actualize the kind of motivations and directions you want to go in your life. Don’t just be, like, passive and allow the outside world to direct you the way it’s trying to direct you. Take from the world what you want to take from it. Seek inspiration so that you can, … Because, I mean, I’m a romanticist. I believe in racism for romanticist reasons ultimately. Like I said before, I believe that racism is the most beautiful way to live.

 

[1:25:48]

 

So that’s why I choose to be a racist. I also think it’s necessary to secure a future for my progeny. And there’s all these other reasons and there’s all this other logic to it, that it’s more practical and so on.

 

But fundamentally, I think it’s the most beautiful way to live. Because I’m trying to honor my blood, honor who I am, be authentically myself through the practice of racial consciousness and advocacy and so on.

 

So to me that’s what it’s ultimately about. It’s about when I look at myself in the mirror, am I being real? Am I being true to myself or am I a fraud? I don’t want to feel like a fraud when I look at myself in the mirror. But if I was just a normie and I was playing video games and just gratifying myself with banal entertainment and there was no real higher purpose or meaning to my cycle of getting out of bed, going to work, coming home and so on, then I would look in the mirror and I would be ashamed.

 

So to me that’s what the motivation is. It’s like you want to be able to actually love yourself for a good reason. Not just tell yourself that you’re amazing, as a cope, but you want to be able to feel dignity in who you are and feel a sense of direction and purpose in your life. So you actually have to go and get it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, there’s something, you described it as a “romanticism”.

 

And what I find particularly romantic is the man who, regardless of setbacks, does not give up! Does not buckle! He just keeps getting up, he keeps going. He’s still believes in himself. Not just himself, but whatever it was he was representing. Nothing breaks him, nothing breaks his spirit. Just the perpetual maintenance of the national spirit, which I said you can supercharge with a bit of self pride as well. Right? You can tie those in together. There’s something beautiful about that. And that’s what keeps me going, man. Like it’s a no-brainer.

 

Joel Davis: A couple other Superchats. White Power said:

 

“Make better Internet future ethno-state policy.”

 

Yeah, well we just put White people in charge of everything and deport all the brown people and all of these problems like the Internet not working and some, will just fix themselves. 65Stoney said:

 

“The Spanish golden age started in 1492. They expelled the jews in 1492 and they expelled the Muslims in 1492 as well. Check the scoreboard of history. We stay winning!”

 

Yeah, that speaks for itself. I’m not going to go on some whole tangent about that.

 

[1:28:42]

 

Also, I think we need to discuss this. Tom, you made a really long post about former associate. I can’t remember his actual name because it’s some Greek bullshit! But everyone knows him as Medi, Stefanos. You know his name.

 

But you made a long post detailing how basically he was raising money under the auspices of representing the organization. He was a former member, raising money for when you were in jail or for your legal fund or whatever, for the various legal appearances. Totally unbeknownst to you, just under the just basically convincing people as a scam that he was doing so in order to basically just screw them over, take their money and spend it on God knows what. And you’ve kind of gradually kind of uncovered this in recent months and decided to go public. And then since you went public, you said all these other people came out of the woodwork saying:

 

“Oh, yeah, he hit me up for money.”

 

And like this guy has managed to scam a lot of people a lot of money. It’s probably an important thing to inform the community about it and discuss. Because it’s really important because there was a few people that also came out of the woodwork and said:

 

“Oh, yeah, I knew that guy was a piece of shit from years ago. He doxed my friend.”

 

And so on.

 

And I was like, why didn’t you say anything until now? It’s actually kind of important in a community that when there’s a bad actor, that people inform the rest of the community quite publicly as best they can about someone who’s a bad actor. Not just like they don’t like someone, like they don’t get along with them or something. But when someone has done, like, seriously immoral behavior, that is cause for genuine concern. So, like, in this instance.

 

So anyway, I don’t know, Tom, what you want to say about this.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, so his name is Stefan Heraculus, which I believe that Heraculus, I think, is a translation of Hercules. It means Stephanos of Hercules, which is a good name. That’s a very strong name. But he certainly didn’t live up to his name. He certainly didn’t behave Herculean. He caved to pretty simple vices.

 

I only met Stefan once before I went to jail. And he had no interest in joining our organization. He was happy to watch on the sidelines and do his own thing.

 

And I think he was studying at Melbourne Uni at the time. And I met him with Jacob and we had a good chat. And I’d seen him online, but I’d never met him before. And it was a good meeting. I didn’t have necessarily a good or bad impression of him. He just seemed like a hard worker in his own field, and he was going to stay in his lane, and it was just cool to meet him.

 

[1:31:21]

 

And then when I got out of jail, I noticed that he was started to get involved. When I got out of jail, he was actually one of the first guys that I met that had joined the organize while I was away. And I was just impressed with his determination. I was impressed that he would show up to everything. I was impressed that he was just a hard worker. He just put his head down and whatever was asked of him, he did it.

 

And a lot of people online were talking shit about him. A lot of people disliked him. And a lot of that, I found was almost clouded by the fact that he was a Cypriot. And we had never had a Cypriot in the organization before. We made it very clear that we allow Greeks and Italians in our organization.

 

Obviously, we don’t want to become a Greek and Italian organization. But a small amount of Greeks and Italians is a reflection of the European, broader European community in Australia. So we were okay with that. And a Cypriot, well, they’re a Greek.

 

So obviously we’ve had our issues with Drew Pavlou recently, which is an interesting conundrum. This has happened at the same time. You’ve been battling a Cypriot and I’ve been battling a Cypriot for different reasons. And they’re actually quite similar people. Drew Pavlou and Stefanos are quite similar people. Drew Pavlou’s kind of engaged with the Labor Party, and he goes to a good university, and he’s quite well educated and he’s quite verbally intelligent. And he’s the son of a greengrocer, or a fishmonger or something like that. And Stefanos has a very similar tale. So he’s the son, I think, of a cobbler, a shoemaker, and he’s quite well educated and he’s very verbally intelligent like Drew. And he had a lot of issues online, a lot of drama, but I never had any issue with him personally.

 

And so I saw all the beef that he had on the Internet and I just stayed away from it. There’s so much beef on the Internet that you can kind of get lost on it. And no one had really given me any clear reason as to why I should dislike him, other than the fact that they think he doesn’t look White enough. And that’s fair enough. I don’t have an issue with people having that opinion of Cypriots. I know you probably have that opinion of Cypriots, Joel. I don’t have that issue. We all draw the line in the sand somewhere. We all draw the line in the sand somewhere. There’s some people that say that I don’t look White enough. I get messages all the time saying, why is your beard so dark? Are you even Anglo Saxon and shit like that?

 

So I’m like:

 

“All right. You know, I only have green eyes. I don’t even have blue eyes, you know.”

 

So not to be a slippery slope fallacy.

 

[1:33:47]

 

Obviously, we draw the line somewhere and we draw it somewhere around Cyprus and Malta. Right? That’s a fact. We all do.

 

So we don’t have an issue with northern Italians, but when it comes to Sicilians, we’re like, okay, all right. We don’t want, like, a hundred of these in the group, but one or two, if they’re good blokes, maybe we can make it work, but we don’t want to turn into Sicilian society.

 

So anyway, I’ll get to the point.

 

The whole time the guy was stealing money. And I didn’t really have any suspicion of this because I didn’t believe anyone was giving him any money. The first time I heard a rumour that anyone was giving him any money, which I was a little bit concerned about, was he was selling stickers on the Internet. And that was against my values. We don’t do that. Activists will compensate each other by paying cost price. Like, if South Australia print a bunch of stickers and they’re nice stickers, they’ve got a better machine than Victoria or Queensland, cost price will work it out. If it costs $50 to print 10,000 stickers, then we give them the money.

 

But he was selling them like he was making a profit off it, like a clear, obvious profit. He was selling, like, two cent stickers for more than two cent, like a considerable amount more. And I was concerned about that, but it wasn’t on my list of priorities. I was like, I just told someone to tell him to not do that.

 

He wasn’t in the inner circle, although he had a bit of clout on the Internet, he wasn’t in any decision making. He wasn’t in the inner circle of the Org. He wasn’t even a full member. He was what’s called an Initiate Member.

 

I was just keeping an eye on him, and I had many conversations about his development and whether he was going to be asking to become a full member or not in the future. And if he was, there were things that he might have to compromise on. He liked to do certain things on the Internet that I didn’t appreciate, I didn’t think, fit the values of the organization.

 

Anyway, we’ll cut to the point. Yeah, I cannot, … At no stage instructed him to ever collect money for me. Ever! Not once!

 

And yet there seemed to be a perception by people, not in real life, people on the Internet, that aren’t connected to the, in real life community. They had a perception that because they saw him in a photo with me, or because they saw him sort of strategically placed with me during key events, that he was therefore maybe a leader in the organization, and that him asking people for money, … Because what he basically did was every week he would make multiple calls to people in the online community and hit them up about money for the organization.

 

[1:36:26]

 

And nobody ever messaged me about this until about nine months ago, which was around the time that I was removing him from the Org, for a different reason. And no one ever questioned that. And I asked everyone that gave him money on the Org’s behalf, I said:

 

“Why did you give him money on the Org’s behalf? I don’t understand.”

 

And the response that I got from everyone in the community, the wider community, was that they just assumed he was the errand boy. They just assumed that he just followed up things, that he was like an errand boy. He just did all these little tasks for the Org. That was just his job in the Org to follow up people and ask people for money. And I was too busy to do it myself. And he was tasked with that role. He almost, he created this kind of sense of that was his position within the Org, without officially saying it it was very clever to not, like, incriminate himself. He tried to cover his tracks as cleverly as possible. Because he’s got a very high verbal IQ, like Drew Pavlou, but very poor morals. And I think he has very expensive habits. And that’s why he was milking the movement for, I would say, about two years.

 

And I cottoned onto it early, sorry, late last year, around the time that I was removing him from the Org. But I didn’t have enough proof. I only had a couple people that kind of gave me vague messages. They didn’t give me any concrete evidence. They said:

 

“Oh, it was all over voice call, so I can’t give you his exact words.”

 

And I would say to him, I need a statement. I need, like you to write out an official statement of the conversation you had with this person. Did he or did he not say exactly that he was raising money for my legal fund, or did he say for legal funds in general, or did he say the Org in general or did he say for his legal fund?

 

I needed people to be more clear with what they were saying. The first three people that messaged me, it was kind of a mixed bag. But as time went on over the last six months before making that statement, it became an almost weekly occurrence where someone would message me and say:

 

“Oh, hey, man, I hope you had a good birthday. I sent Medi a bunch of money for your birthday dinner. You know, I hope you had a good meal. That meal was on me that Medi shouted you.”

 

And I’m thinking to myself:

 

“What the fuck are you talking about? Like, Medi never bought me dinner, so why’d you give Medi $300?”

 

Like, what? Like, why would you need to give Stefanos, Medi, why would you need to give him hundreds of dollars for my birthday dinner? We have a fundraiser. Why wouldn’t you just send it to the fundraiser and say:

 

“Hey, this isn’t directly for the fundraiser. I want to buy tomorrow dinner. Can you go out to dinner? I’m paying for your dinner.”

 

I just don’t understand when we have things pinned very clearly. There’s no confusion. This is our official fundraiser, or this is our official whatever. Why does it need to go through a middleman?

 

Why did people not see that as suspicious? I mean, it’s very sad. It’s very sad.

 

Blair Cottrell: How did this come to light? How did you discover this?

 

[1:39:24]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, the first person that messaged me, just a random person in the community. I think he was in Medi’s group chat. He just randomly messaged me one day and he said something like:

 

“Oh, hey, Tom I hope everything’s going well with the legal fund I sent you. I sent through $1,000 recently and I hope it all goes well.”

 

And I said:

 

“Oh, cool, like, where did you send a $1,000?”

 

Like, because I’m looking through the GiveSendGo the fundraiser.

 

I’m like:

 

“Did you send it through that or did you send it through the crypto?”

 

And he’s like:

 

“No, no, I gave it to Medi. I gave it to Stefanos.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Why did you give it, … Like, what? What do you mean?”

 

And he’s like:

 

“Oh, you know, he called me and he said it’s really urgent. I have to talk to you know, like, it’s a it’s desperate times at the moment. Like, it’s really, really important. Can you give me a call?”

 

And then chewed his ear off for half an hour about stuff.

 

And then, yeah, got the guy to transfer money. And, yeah, that was the first person to sort of come forward.

 

And then, yeah, as I said, since then, it’s been. I think there’s been about maybe 15 people, 16 people that have messaged me before making that statement.

 

And since I’ve made that statement, it’s been another maybe seven people that have messaged me. And in total, I estimate it’s around., … We’re getting, we’re over $51,000.

 

Blair Cottrell: Wow! Now, you mentioned there that this guy had strategically, this is the way you put it, strategically placed himself next to you in photos. And that stood out to me because I don’t get in a lot of footage these days, public footage, but occasionally someone will film me doing a lift or something if I’m training with some of the boys. And probably well over a year ago, we’re ripping out on some deadlifts.

 

Thomas Sewell: It was up in northern suburbs. Yeah.

 

[1:41:03]

 

Blair Cottrell: You know which video I’m referring to? And I noticed that he, like, was awkwardly standing in the exact place, he knew that he would be in the footage. Like, he went and stood there deliberately. And I thought:

 

“Well, maybe that was part of his con as well.”

 

It’s just like:

 

“I know these people. I’m close to these people. You can trust me!”

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: I mean, it may not even be a conscious thing. It may just be a bad bone in his body that compels him to do this as a survivor thing.

 

Joel Davis: Absolutely conscious! He’s a little weasel! I mean, he’s $51,000 and counting. He basically griffs an entire life for himself.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that what the fears are? The 51 after his name? Medi51 grand I’ve ripped from you guys. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: But. Sorry to hear it, man. But look, you live and learn. These people are always going to exist. But through experience, you can put measures in place to prevent this kind of thing from happening again. Right.

 

Joel Davis: But a key measure is that don’t ever trust some middleman. Like exercise a little bit of discretion. Yeah. No one is ever going to ask you for money on my behalf or Tom’s behalf or Blair’s behalf. That’s just not how we operate. I don’t ask anyone for money in a direct way, period. You know, like, there’s ways that people can donate. They can send a Superchat to the show or something, or Tom has GiveSendGo fundraisers. It’ll all be done in a very obvious and public way so you can trust it. Otherwise, don’t trust it.

 

And if you got any issues, there’s ways to contact people. Send an email, send a message. Like, if someone is trying to raise money on people’s behalf, like, say something, inform us so that nothing like this can happen again.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s an expensive lesson for the community to learn. And if anyone ever approaches you and says that they’re raising money on somebody else’s behalf, you need to immediately report that up the chain of command. You need to immediately report that to the person. Like, if some random person that’s connected to the movement, that has a public page and says:

 

“Hey I’m doing a crowd fund raiser for Joel’s fucking studio launch. You know, we’re trying to get Joel a studio. You know, can you help? I’m one of Joel’s admins. Can you make this happen?”

 

Like, don’t give them any money! Like, message Joel straight away and said:

 

“Hey, do you know, this guy’s trying to raise money on your behalf?”

 

Just straight away. If anyone tries to raise money on my behalf or Blair’s behalf. I mean, we have a treasurer in the Org and everyone that’s in real life here in Victoria knows who that person is, and that person accounts for all the money that’s raised.

 

[1:43:58]

 

And likewise, the other states, it’s usually the state leader collects the monthly payments. So that way there’s accountability. That way the leader has control of the money, knows how much money they have, and then when an event comes up, we’ve got the money to spend it. But there’s not just some sidekick, you know, some merchant little middleman collecting it on, … Like, it’s just bizarre! It’s utterly bizarre to me. And it’s just an expensive lesson for everyone.

 

Blair Cottrell: Any strategies for repayments? Maybe a bit of community service, work off the debt? I suppose you’re still brainstorming.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Well, as I said, it’s like the same question as the guy that said:

 

“You know, what would you do if your daughter was dating a black or something?”

 

It’s like, well, we don’t have control of society, so what we would like to do and what we can do are two different things.

 

So obviously, if this was done at a national scale, if we were a nation controlling organization, and there was a dude in there, this is just pure corruption. This is what the government are currently doing at the moment. Like Scott Morrison, he organized a grant for $444 million for the Great Barrier Reef. And he had four of his mates just on the board of the company, and they didn’t do anything to preserve the Great Barrier Reef. And they just pocketed, like, $400 million.

 

I mean, the Albanese government does 600 million for PNG Rugby team. Where the fuck is that money going? 600 million so they can get a private jet and they can pay coaches to train up these fucking monkeys in PNG to play rugby. That’s going to his buddies! It’s all money laundering. It’s all corruption!

 

And in China or in Vietnam, if you do this, they execute you. They have capital punishment. And if you’re caught stealing, if you’re caught stealing a little bit, you probably just get flogged. And I’ll probably give you a year in jail. Like, if you steal ten grand or 20 grand or something. Yeah. You’ll probably lose the finger. You’ll lose a hand. They’ll put you in jail for a year, something like that. They’ll teach you a lesson. They’ll be like:

 

“Hey, hey, hey! You’ve, you know, spent some money that you shouldn’t have spent.”

 

But if you steal millions of dollars, which is what this is equivalent to the amount of money that Medi has stolen is more money than what we raise as an Org in a year. So he’s basically stolen the GDP of the nation. Like, our community is our nation. And so he’s stolen the equivalent of Papua New Guinea’s GDP, or Vietnam’s GDP. Like, so if you did that in Vietnam, if you stole the equivalent of Vietnam’s GDP. Not GDP, sorry, but not gross domestic product, but gross domestic revenue. If you stole what the government takes in tax, if you took that off, like, they would just execute you!

 

So how do we get the money back? We take control of the nation. Unfortunately, all these things. Divorces, women doing things inappropriately, Medi stealing money. There was a guy, there was a kid years ago called Ethan Zakola, and he leaked our manual to the press and to Antifa. Like, we had an activism manual. And this little piece of shit, you met him once, he had the bung shoulder. It was like, the weirdo out of 300 Spartans. He had bad posture and he had a bung shoulders. And it was Ethan Zakola. He was just a dorky little 16 year old kid. We had him on the bench press. We’re teaching him how to box. You showed him how to, like, do bicep curls and stuff. And he would always complain about his shoulder. Anyway, for no reason whatsoever, he just leaked our manual to our political enemies.

 

And, I mean, why do people do this? Why? Like, they’re just rotten people! They’re just rotten creatures!

 

So, yeah, that’s like. That’s equivalent to giving away nuclear research to the Russians. Like what those jews did in the USA after the Manhattan project. You gave away state secrets, it’s execution.

 

But, yeah, we unfortunately just have to ride the storm.

 

Blair Cottrell: Stay the course, mate. Stay the course!

 

Thomas Sewell: Just these fuck heads.

 

Joel Davis: Next time there’s a ugly little wog that tries to insinuate himself in the movement. I ain’t being his friend.

 

And now, by the way, some people, so there’s some Italians out there that are upset at me because of comments that I’ve made. I’m a racialist. Many of you are fine. Many of you are all right. It’s a case by case thing. A high racial stock Italian, look White themselves. Well, yeah, they conduct themselves properly. But then there’s some that have got this where they almost look like they have to explain how they’re White. Like, it’s not exactly obvious that they’re White. They look racially ambiguous, and they behave according to that racial ambiguity. Because people are what they are the quality of the character is dependent to a very large extent by the quality of the blood. And, yeah, the Mediterranean is a hotbed of alien, you know, alien blood that has infected some of these populations, and these people behave, you know, according to the standards of their Levantine jewish, whatever, …

 

[1:49:23]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Can you put the genetic map up? I’ll send you the genetic map. Can you put that up? We’ll just have a look. We just got to have a look at the genetic map.

 

Joel Davis: I’m going to read a couple Superchats because there’s a few on Odysee. White Bracer said, a few said:

 

“This is really good discussion. This is my much higher standard of discourse than I’m used to. I usually only hear about Australia from Randbot 2020.”

 

Thanks again, guys. Well, thanks for the kind words. Cardiff said:

 

“Cheers from the US Pacific Northwest. Excellent show, gentlemen. Becoming my favorite to watch. You lads come across intelligent and knowledgeable, with a positive fervor of our shared situation in Western societies. Hitler’s words about his mother’s passing is quite deep. Do, you know how Hitler, …”

 

With a little, you know, Roman iconography. So that was nice.

 

Land of the Fake Home of the Gay said:

 

“Great panel. Thank you, gentlemen, for being exemplary White men for our boys to look up to.”

 

There’s lot of love in the Superchats over on Odysee, so it’s quite nice.

 

And also, Lon Awfully sent a Roman and said:

 

“Some dough.”

 

So and he said:

 

“$14.88.”

 

I always liked the $14.88 Superchat, so thanks for that. And Jadam’s 43 on Rumble said:

 

“Keep up the good work, lads.”

 

So, anyway, thanks for the encouragement.

 

What were you going to say, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: Can I re-summon the Italian question? Is that all right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course. We’re going into.

 

Thomas Sewell: He wasn’t Italian, he was Cypriot.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I know. But we were talking about Italians after the Cypriot question.

 

Joel Davis: Because some Italians objected to my, … Because when we talk about wogs in Australia, because wogs in Britain, by the way, this is for those who don’t know who are foreigners, and we’ve got a lot of foreigners watching. So a wog in Britain basically means a non-White. A wog is just a catch all term for non-Whites.

 

[1:51:18]

 

Blair Cottrell: Or Western Oriental Gentlemen, I was told by my father, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s something that people say, but I don’t think, etymologically, that’s where it comes from originally. I think it originally comes from Gollywog, and then got shortened to wog.

 

But anyway, when Italians and Greeks first came to Australia, which was after the Second World War, prior to the Second World War, we were somewhat Nordicist in our immigration policy, so we didn’t really allow, … I think there was a few immigrants, but it was a very small amount that ever came from anywhere other than northwest Europe. Heritage Australians referred to them as wogs. That’s how racist we were. We’re being like, inter-European racists. That’s how, like, racist Australia was prior to the Second World War and immediately afterwards.

 

And so that was a it was basically saying:

 

“Oh. You’re Greek, you’re basically a nigger.”

 

Like, it was kind of like banter. It was kind of racist banter. But then over time, it just became a term to just mean someone from the Mediterranean is now in Australia, is known as a wog.

 

So when we say wog, it could be like, an Italian, a Greek, it could be a like any kind of Balkan country.

 

Sometimes people get called wogs who are actually, like, Middle Eastern. Like, if they’re from the Levant or something, they get called wogs as well. Muslims have tried to appropriate the term.

 

Blair Cottrell: These are the sorts of people you’re describing. These people were attacked on site during the Cronulla riots. They call them riots, but really it was kind of just like a, I don’t know, some flashbang awakening process where Australians just decided to chase everyone out of town who wasn’t Anglo. And anyone who was Middle Eastern, of Middle Eastern appearance, they said in the papers back then, was literally chased down and beaten up by just packs of angry White guys. You can look this up. If you haven’t heard of it, you’re in America, some European country, Cronulla riots in Australia. It’s good Australian history.

 

But what I was saying about Italians, I’m going to try to spit it out quickly. There’s all this hype about Italian cuisine. But all it is is white carbs! Just like, white flour pasta, white flour bread with shitloads of garlic thrown onto it. Like, what’s the hype about, man? It’s really bad for you! It’s simple food. It’s not nutritious. It’s actually peasant food. Like, you know what pizza is, right? Pizza is just like, dough with the Leftovers from the Lord’s table sprinkled on top. So the regular peasantry had something to feed on when the Lords were done. I mean, this isn’t cuisine. This isn’t like, real food.

 

So yeah, it’s delicious for the brain because it’s just fast glucose energy, but there’s no protein in it. It’s not going to rebuild muscles. It’s just I just want people to stop talking so much to me about how great pasta is and Italian food is so amazing! Like, man, I’d rather have a steak and potatoes.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Heil steak and potatoes! Anglo maxing steak.

 

[showing genetic map]

 

But anyway, this is the principal component analysis. Principal component analysis is not, it doesn’t give you the whole picture. There’s better ways than this to determine all these genetic differences, but it is like a good basic snapshot of how genes cluster.

 

[1:54:39]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, yeah. It’s about genetic distance.

 

So if we can just draw a circle around. Obviously, everyone can see in the middle there, it says Sicilian and it says Ashkenazi and Sephardic jewish. And the Sicilian points are in that kind of like all those woggy colors you’ve got. The wogs there are in that kind of teal color, and the jews are pink.

 

So you see how they cross over there in the middle a smidge. But where we say broadly European is we can draw a circle around that whole cluster of everything from the yellow in the top corner all the way down to Spanish. And the and obviously, we include Sicilian. They’re in Europe, they’re European.

 

But you can see that Sicilian is quite far away from Germanic. Germanic, and central European, and Baltic and Slavic and French are all quite similar. Obviously, Spanish are quite dark. You can see that quite clearly.

 

But again, genetic distance from where we are. As and when they say Germanic, they also mean Celtic, so they mean Germano-Celtic, because Germans and Celts are so similar. I think the Celts are more to the bottom right corner, and the Germans are more to the top left corner of the Germanic cluster, which is that little blue cluster there.

 

And then obviously, the French, you can see, are kind of like a different variation of Germano Celtic, in their own little cluster over to the side.

 

So what we’re dealing with is, I don’t know, Joel, if you can put your mouse cursor just below Sicilian, halfway between Sicilian and Ashkenazi, there’s crosses just down a little bit. Yep. You see those crosses there? So that is, I think, Maltese there. So, as you can see, Malta is kind of that’s very borderline. A lot of people might not consider Maltese as being fully European. And then I think if you go up a bit, there’s crosses that go the other way.

 

So, yeah, those crosses. So those crosses that go from there all the way towards the Balkans, that is Cypriot. That’s a, the crosses that are closer to Balkan are Greek, and the crosses that are closer to north Levantine are Cypriot.

 

So you can see, and also, interestingly, you can see that there are some Turkish, which are the blue triangles above. Those are Turkish haplogroups, and they are in some cases closer to Europeans than they are to normal Turkish people. And so those are obviously Anatolian Turks. They’re Greek Turks. They’re actually more Aryan, more European.

 

But you can still see how they are quite genetically different from Europeans, even if they possess some phenotypically European features. You will meet Turks with blue eyes. You’ll meet Lebs with blue eyes, and sometimes you even meet Turkish women with quite light hair, like blonde, blondish hair. That’s because they’re in those clusters. They’re not in the normal Turkish clusters.

 

But this is a good genetic map that just shows the, in a two dimensional scale, the distancing, the genetic distance. And obviously, nationalism, this is scientific nationalism. Nationalism comes down to how closely related you are to someone. That’s what it comes down to.

 

And so we feel the most affinity as Anglo-Celtics here in Australia with other Anglo-Celtics.

 

[1:57:49]

 

But obviously, because we had the “Big Australia” policy in the fifties, we included all the people around Germanics. We created this, like, greater Germanic sort of colony here in Australia, that’s still 90% of the White population, is primarily Germano Celtic.

 

So what we’re dealing with here, and what a lot of frustration in the movement is, and this frustration within my organization, of course, and this frustration within the wider movement is, how do we define European? Where do we draw that line? Do we allow these clusters, like Cypriots and Maltese? Do we allow them in the movement, considering how far away they are from the Germano Celtic?

 

So, yeah, it’s not a conversation I really want to create a conclusion to, but I think it’s worth having the conversation, and I think it’s a fair conversation regardless of whether your views are, yes, we should allow these people, or whether your views are, no, we should not allow these people. I think it’s worth hearing.

 

Joel Davis: I support the physiognomy check principle. I kind of if someone, like, trust your gut, I think that’s how I see things, because you could see, you can see the race in someone’s face. Like, no one is going to sit there and debate whether I’m European or whether Blair or you, Tom, whether we are Europeans. It’s just obvious.

 

So if it’s not obvious, then we’re in a, …

 

Blair Cottrell: When in doubt. When in doubt, there is no doubt. If you need to ask yourself, if you need to wonder, probably no. I suppose that’s a good policy.

 

Thomas Sewell: And then the only other thing, just quickly, is the component of we also have to consider the fact that we are in a European alliance in the sense that even if we want Sweden to remain Nordic and England to remain primarily sort of Nordo Celtic, we are also in alliance with nationalist groups in Italy, in southern Italy, in these border nations, like Golden Dawn in Greece, that are leading the struggle. You know, the Greeks at the moment, they cop a lot of flak here in Australia, but in Europe, the Europeans look towards the Greeks as being on the front line and have been on the front line for hundreds of years holding the borders of Europe, strong and true.

 

And obviously the Austrians and the Polish came down and helped with the sieges of the Ottomans and stuff. But the majority of the losses and the majority of the sacrifice keeping Europe White came at the cost of Greek blood. It came at the cost of Spanish blood.

 

And so we can look at the Spaniards, we can look at the Sicilians, and we can look at the Greeks from our ivory towers, in some cases, literally ivory in the sense that our skin is fairer, is whiter, but our skin is fairer and whiter because they kept the sates of Europe safe. They held the fort.

 

[2:00:38]

 

So I think on that ground, I’m a big believer in this idea that I’m a Nordicist. I do agree. I like the Nords, even though I’m not Nordic, pure Nordic myself. I’ve obviously got some Celtic and lower European blood in me, but I like the Nordic principle.

 

But I think that we draw the line in the sand where we draw it, and the men on the front line, we don’t necessarily want to lose Sweden and lose Norway and lose Denmark for what they are in terms of their genetic stock. We don’t want to see all the Danish breed with all the Germans, sorry, all the Greeks. We don’t necessarily want to see that, but I think we should have a healthy relationship with our cousins, even if second cousins.

 

Joel Davis: Of course, And obviously, like the Italians, …

 

Thomas Sewell: There are a lot of people watching,

 

Joel Davis: And the Greeks have have contributed amazing things to Western civilization. And I mean, not even just going back to the ancient Romans and ancient Greeks, but even in the contemporary period, I mean, the Italians in particular, you know, incredible fashion, incredible cars, incredible cultural output of various kinds. So many great, …

 

Blair Cottrell: The original fascists.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! They’ve contributed a lot. So obviously, I respect Italy as a nation, it’s a very respectable nation, and the same for the Greeks. But they’ve just been somewhat contaminated. And it’s for geographical and historical reasons.

 

I mean, the Roman Empire brought in some more foreign blood. But then also., … Then you’ve got the yeah, as Tom said, they’ve been on the front lines defending Europe from, like, Islamic raiding and things. So over the millennia, so obviously, that’s taken its toll to an extent.

 

And that’s why it’s a case by case thing. There’s plenty of good stock Italians and Greeks. Yeah, they are very clearly European, and their blood has remained relatively solid and pure despite all these factors.

 

But then there’s some people that look kind of fucked up, and it’s like, what? This guy looks kind of fucked up! Just because you can slap the name Greek on this guy doesn’t mean he’s a pure Greek.

 

[2:02:56]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. I think the Greeks and Italians, when we won the race war and we’ve taken back control of our nations, I don’t think they’d complain if perhaps there’s some, you know, gentrification of the genes. I don’t know how to explain at this stage.

 

It’s like what you were saying before. If we had a million Swedes move to Australia, no racist Australian is going to complain that, like, we’re going to be too argy-bargy. I don’t think the Greeks would complain if, like, there was an excess birth rate in the Nordic countries and they created holiday homes in Greece or something. I don’t think they would complain. I think they’d be like:

 

“Yeah, this is probably good. Let’s bring the Greek blood back to where it was.”

 

I think the Greeks would appreciate the help, the genetic help. And if they don’t, well, whatever. Okay, then closed borders, and we can, you know, we don’t have to go full Kai Murros*, you know what I mean?

 

[* Voice of Europe: Kai Murros-TRANSCRIPT
https://katana17.com/2016/01/31/voice-of-europe-kai-murros-transcript/]

 

Blair Cottrell: I just want to be around people who look like me, or who look close to me. I still respect people who look a bit different and who are a bit different, but I just would prefer not to be around them. And why would they want to be around me? You know, this brings us to the argument which is at the core of what we believe, doesn’t it?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, it’s like everybody wants to be White, and I around White people. The whiter you are, the more people want to be with you, around you and like you. Almost like the Whiter you are, the better you are. Isn’t that? It’s strange.

 

But Harold Flight donated another $10. While we were speaking about this subject, he said:

 

“Wogs, WOGS, Worker on Government Service from the British when in Egypt with the nomadic Ghuls. Gollywog was the term that developed.”

 

So I think Joel’s right about the term wog. I think maybe the development of the phrase Western Oriental Gentleman was a way to maybe steer the public consciousness away from the fact it was kind of a racial slur and they were trying to dignify it.

 

Joel Davis: Well, no, I mean, no. Western Oriental, … They’re basically just., …

 

Thomas Sewell: In west Asia.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: My granddad was the one that told me that it was Western Oriental Gentlemen. And he said that it referred to Afghanis and Turks, when he was a kid. It didn’t refer to Italians and Greeks.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Because Afghanis are like western Asians, you know what I mean? They look very Asian. And Turks. Most Turks look very Asian. You can see the Asiatic blood in them. The Genghis Khan blood in them.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, race is the key to all human history. If you can’t acknowledge and appreciate race, you’re basically going through this world blind. You’re not seeing what’s right in front of you. Because I think race and what is, unfortunately, a lot of the time, crude interracial mixture is what gives rise and fall to civilizations, human civilizations. And it really is that simple. Race is at the core of human civilization, always will be and always has been.

 

[2:05:57]