Evolution and Behavior – katana17

Sven Longshanks – Albion Insights – Speech Crime – AI 031923 – May 16, 2023 – Transcript

admin — Thu, 18 May 2023 09:59:50 +0000

Sven Longshanks

Albion Insights

Speech Crime

Tue, May 16, 2023

[In this audio James Allchurch, aka, Sven Longshanks the host of Radio Albion, talks (on Mar 19, 2023) before attending his trial, about the charges against him (inciting racial hate) and how they came about:

“Hope Not Hate complained to the BBC, the BBC complained to an MP and the MP complained to the police about the content on what was then Radio Aryan. This was in 2017.

The arrest and interview was in 2019, but the charges were not filed until 2021 and all except one were different to the podcast topics asked about in the police interview from 2019.”

Since then Sven has been found guilty and is now facing 2 1/2 year in prison for speaking up against multiculturalism and the ongoing dispossession of our lands by non-Whites, engineered by the (((Money Power))) and their traitorous puppet politicians.

– KATANA]

https://www.radioalbion.com/2023/05/albion-insights-speech-crime-ai-031923.html

Published on Tue, May 16, 2023

Description

HomeThe Daily NationalistAlbion Insights: Speech Crime – AI 031923
Albion Insights: Speech Crime – AI 031923
SL12:00
Sven Longshanks talks before attending the trial, about the charges against him and how they came about.
Hope Not Hate complained to the BBC, the BBC complained to an MP and the MP complained to the Police about the content on what was then Radio Aryan. This was in 2017.
The arrest and interview was in 2019, but the charges were not filed until 2021 and all except one were different to the podcast topics asked about in the Police interview from 2019.
Presented by Sven Longshanks
Albion Insights: Speech Crime – AI 031923
Download
The Audiobook archive contains many more Albion Narrations podcasts
See the daily radio schedule for more ethnocentric audio to download
Join the chatroom and follow the feed
Subscribe to Radio Albion on Telegram HERE
Add this http://audio.radioalbion.com:8777/; to your DAB player to listen to Radio Albion
Click for new Shoutcast player
We can accept donations sent to this NEW bitcoin wallet identifier:
bc1qvdwdj6gfruxrt9fre3vhpx650rmwa2p7hu0mg0
We can also accept Etherium to this wallet:
0xDfD578999B6FBc

_____________

TRANSCRIPT QUALITY = 4.5 Stars

1 Star — Poor quality with many errors, contains nonsense text 2 Stars — Low quality with many errors, some nonsense text. 3 Stars — Medium quality with some errors. 4 Stars — Good quality with only a few errors. 5 Stars — High quality with few to no errors.

NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(28:33 mins)

Sven Longshanks Sentenced to Two and a Half Years in Prison

It’s Multiculturalism That’s Being Criticised

What Led up to Me Being Taken to Court

System Resistance Network 2017

Allegation That Hope Not Hate Made

BBC Makes a Program

MP from Cardiff Calls for Radio Aryan to Be Investigated

Two Years Later, My Door Got Knocked Down by Police in December 2019

Changed the Name of Radio Aryan to Radio Albion

Police Raid by 15 Officers and Equipment Taken

Questioned by Police

Audio Books – the Painted Savages of England, the International Jew

Mark Collett Gets Sven New Equipment

In 2021 Police Serve Sven with 15 New Charges

Going to Court in 2023

Why Waste Energy on Hating Non-Whites?

Our System was Built for Whites, Not Non-Whites with Low IQ

Tension Created When You Have Multiculturalism

You Can’t Change Blacks, Muslims or Jews

Other Groups Are Thriving but Not Whites

The Law Against Incitement to Hate – Legislating Against an Emotion

You’ll Only Be Listening to This If It All Goes Wrong!

Sven Longshanks Sentenced to Two and a Half Years in Prison

top

Hello and welcome to Albion Insights. You’re listening to me, Sven Longshanks streaming at Radio Albion.com. I am recording this today on the 19 March [2023] and the trial is supposed to start tomorrow, where I am accused of either inciting hate, or bearing in mind all the circumstances, hate was likely to be stirred up. And I’m recording this in case everything goes wrong.

There’s obviously no intent to incite hate against anyone. The whole point of the website is to encourage virtue among our people and to pursue legal and democratic means to solve the problems that we see happening in society, problems that we identify as stemming from the government policy of multiculturalism.

It’s Multiculturalism That’s Being Criticised

top

And it’s always been quite clear on the website that it’s multiculturalism that’s being criticised, not the individual peoples, the individual groups. And you certainly can’t blame an individual for the behaviour of a group, because the chances are the individual that you’re going to meet is not going to be responsible for any of the perceived negative behaviour of a group. And that’s not what we’re about.

When we talk about the differences between these different people groups, it’s just to highlight the fact that they are different. They are measurably different, not just in what they look like, but also with just about every statistic you care to look at that there is a different average. There’s a different average IQ, there’s a different age range for being fertile or going through adolescence. There’s different fecundity, there’s different incarceration rates, there’s different blood groups. All sorts of differences that there are between groups.

And obviously we are interested in that. We are nationalists, we are proud of the fact that we are different to these other groups and we wish to preserve that difference. And we think that multiculturalism destroys those differences and prevents the chance for a culture to grow in the way that it would naturally grow if it was on its own.

And that’s why we have all these different unique cultures around the world, different expressions of culture. We lose those unique individual expressions of culture when we have multiculturalism. But I’m sure you already all know that.

What Led up to Me Being Taken to Court

top

So I thought what I would talk about today is how this happened. How this led up to, what led up to me being taken to court.

Well, back in 2019 I was arrested. But the story goes back even earlier than that, really. In 2017, Hope Not Hate went to an MP and told the MP that at Radio Ayran we have been promoting a group called the System Resistance Network. And the System Resistance Network were later designated as a terrorist organisation.

System Resistance Network 2017

top

We had not been promoting System Resistance Network. I had a co-host at the time who was called Alex Davies, and we mentioned System Resistance Network twice in one podcast. He brought them up and said that:

“Their propaganda was very likely illegal and it made him blush, or even made him blush.”

Words to that effect.

The next time we mentioned them, they had vandalised a disabled toilet in Cardiff, I think it was, and we utterly condemned the vandalizing of a toilet.

[03:54]

We said that:

“Anybody that has anything to do with this group is either getting involved with idiots that vandalise things, or is getting involved in a group which has been set up by the State.”

Because nationalists don’t go vandalizing toilets, nationalists don’t go graffitiing, badly drawn swastikas places, nationalists don’t go desecrating graves. All of these misplaced ideas that the public have about nationalists, they’re all false. And instances like that, most of the time they’re hate crime hoaxes. They’re carried out by people hoping to make something like that look like a “hate crime”.

So we thought it could have been two reasons. It could have been that the State trying to set up an organisation. And it did turn out in the end that people that joined this organisation were being told that they had to carry out a ridiculous act like vandalizing a toilet.

Allegation That Hope Not Hate Made

top

So, I mean, it does look as if it may well have been a State operation, or the Secret Service may have been involved in there encouraging people to do these silly things so that they could then take them to court afterwards. Either way, we told people to have nothing to do with this organisation, which is the complete opposite of the allegation that Hope Not Hate made.

So Hope Not Hate went to, I think it was the MP of Cardiff. I’d never heard of him before. Doughty, I think his second name is. Don’t know what his first name is. But they went to this MP and they told this MP that we had been promoting this group, Radio Aryan had been. So this MP went to the police and the police said:

“Well, if there’s any crime that’s been carried out, we assure you there will be charges brought against them for this crime.”

BBC Makes a Program

top

The BBC wrote to me and they asked me about, … Just another point, the BBC made this program, and not once did they actually play any of the podcasts where I allegedly said anything positive about System Resistance Network, or whether Alex, or anybody at Radio Aryan, it was at the time, said anything about people should join this group, because we didn’t. And the BBC didn’t play any either. Although that’s what they alleged throughout the program.

MP from Cardiff Calls for Radio Aryan to Be Investigated

top

As I say, they got this MP then to call for Radio Aryan to be investigated. That was in 2017. And at the time I made a podcast in response to this, pointing this out that I’ve gone back, had a look at the podcasts at the time that they were referring to, and there was nothing positive said about this group.

So then we just carried on with Radio Aryan. I thought, should I go to the police station and say:

“Look, this is a false allegation that’s been made. You’re welcome to check out the podcast.”

But I thought:

“Well, they’re likely to say, ‘Well, who are you?’”.

If I say:

“Well, I’m Sven Longshanks.”

They’ll say:

“Well, anybody could be Sven Longshanks could say that.”

Or they might say:

“Well, we’ve never heard of you.”

I mean, which police organisation do you go to? Which police station would you go to for something like that?

[06:50]

So, yeah, I just left it at that. I thought:

“Well, we’re not inciting any hate, we’re not doing anything wrong here.”

We’re identifying multiculturalism as what’s wrong. We’re not directing people to attack minorities or anything ridiculous like that. We’re just talking about issues in society which are caused by multiculturalism.

Two Years Later, My Door Got Knocked Down by Police in December 2019

top

So two years later, my door got knocked down in December 2019! And shortly before that September 2019, I’d organised the first Patriotic Alternative Conference with Mark Collett. And Patriotic Alternative was unveiled to the world at that conference.

Changed the Name of Radio Aryan to Radio Albion

top

And as well, at that time I changed the name of Radio Aryan to Radio Albion. The reason why it was called Radio Aryan in the first place is because, and it said this on the website, is because the word Aryan, the root word, comes from a meaning of “noble and honourable” and it is also used to refer to White people. It’s a fairly old word. And it’s more accurate than saying European because we talk about history here at Radio Albion and we often talk about pre-Roman history.

We talk about history in the Near East and in India and all these places. And you can’t say that the people there were European, because they didn’t originate in Europe, they were Indo-European. And the old word for that was “Aryan”.

So you can’t say Europeans were in the Indus River Valley civilisation in 2000 BC, because they weren’t, but they were White people.

So it was accurate to say Aryan. But Aryan, of course, isn’t very politically correct and of course it brings up negative connotations. It even brings up negative connotations with prison gangs, which of course we didn’t want. It’s not so snappy to call it “Radio Indo-European” though, is it?

So we changed it to Radio Albion, which I would suggest shows that if the website was inciting hate and was likely to stir up hate, which means likely to increase in hate, the website would not have changed its name from Radio Aryan to Radio Albion. It would have gone in the opposite direction, it would have stayed at Radio Aryan and it would have been by that time, it would have been inciting people to take up arms and attack people, which it completely wasn’t! We go ahead and in the complete opposite direction to that.

We just started doing our Greatest Britain series with Lord Robert Baden Powell, and I think we looked at Captain Cook at that point. And that was something that I wanted to do for a long time, was bring history into it.

[09:31]

Police Raid by 15 Officers and Equipment Taken

top

So the police came round, they kicked the front door down, and I had half a dozen of them in my bedroom. I think there was about 15 of them in all. And they took me off to a police station somewhere, I think it was somewhere in Cardiff. And they basically went through my house, took everything that they wanted. They took over a hundred different items! Took computers, microphones. They took things that had nothing to do with the online radio, the internet radio. They took PA speakers. They took a large amplifier, a PA amplifier. Clearly nothing whatsoever to do with digital radio.

I mean, this is just amplification equipment that they took. They even took rags out of my car! Very bizarre! They took all sorts of stuff.

Questioned by Police

top

And then they questioned me. They said:

“We need to question you about this.”

And I thought:

“Well, I’ve done nothing wrong, and I know that my beliefs are not illegal.”

I believe what nationalism is, it is a creed. It’s something that informs every part of your life. The the way that you hold yourself, the way that you look at things. Even the things that you eat, can be related to nationalism. The clothes that you wear, the way that you look at history, the way that you look at religion, it’s all through nationalist lenses, which I’ve always thought:

“Well, it’s a creed, and you are supposed to be protected if you have a creed.”

And I told the police this, and I gave them an interview, and I answered all their questions. They asked me questions about audiobooks that I had done on lynching in the south. And I said:

“Well, that’s a book from, I think, the late 1800s, early 1900s.”

And I said:

“It’s all about statistics, it’s all accurate.”

And it’s basically pointing out that White people were also lynched as well as blacks. And the reason for these lynchings was because law and order had broken down, and because it was 100 miles away from a court.

And if you had people living 100 miles away from a court, and particularly if you had freed slaves there, and they had been riled up by the abolitionists, one of them might carry out a massacre. And then what you had to do was you had to punish that swiftly, which is what happened.

And you also had White people that were badly behaved, and if they carried out a heinous crime, they would be lynched as well. And it was purely and simply because they didn’t have a jury there, they didn’t have a judge there, or a court. So they effectively had to carry out justice themselves. That’s why they were all present at these lynchings.

[12:12]

Audio Books – The Painted Savages of England, The International Jew

top

But they asked me about that they asked me about an audiobook that I did called The Painted Savages of England, which was written by a vicar. A vicar in the Church of England. And the painted savages of England that he’s talking about were Picts. It was a quote from Julius Caesar. But the police seemed to think that it was to do with immigrants.

What else did they ask me about? They asked me about the International jew series, which was written by Henry Ford, which I said was a history of America at the turn of last century. Lots of bits of history that don’t get told in the mainstream books. And it wasn’t me narrating that, though I did host it. I said yes. This is me, Sven Longshanks. And this is Radio Albion. And it was Radio Aryan, you can call it either.

So I gave them an interview. They said, :

“You’ve accounted for yourself very well.”

They said. And they said:

“And if everything that you say checks out, then you don’t have the charges against you.”

So I thought:

“Right, well, sweet then!”

They took everything of mine, they’ll be able to see very clearly that any things such as violence, graffiti, property damage, they’ll see very clearly in my private social media that I’ve condemned, that sort of thing. There had just recently been something of that order that had happened in Denmark, and I was having a private conversation with someone from Denmark and saying:

“How awful it was, how terrible it was.”

So the police could see from my social media that I’m not somebody that supports violence, not someone that supports vandalism.

And I’ve always identified multiculturalism as being the problem. So I thought:

“Well, they’re bound to just drop the charges, aren’t they?”

Mark Collett Gets Sven New Equipment

top

And I didn’t want people to know what had happened either. The radio obviously went quiet for 24 hours, I think it was, and I phoned Mark Collett up straight away and said:

“Mark, can you order me a new computer, order me a new microphone, the police have taken everything, I’ll pay you back for it, but I need to get back online again as quickly as possible.”

So Mark very kindly ordered the equipment that I need, got it delivered to my house, and I was back up and running again within 48 hours. And I just said:

“Oh, we had technical problems yesterday.”

Didn’t think anything more of it, really.

And then we had Covid, and I was waiting for them to say, well, we checked through all your social media, there’s no evidence of you inciting violence or trying to hurt people or showing support for anything illegal.

[14:50]

In 2021 Police Serve Sven with 15 New Charges

top

And then at the end of Covid in 2020, I think it was, might have been 2021, because we’re in 2023 now, aren’t we? In 2021 they came to my door again, the police, and they said:

“Oh, we’ve got to serve you with these charges.”

So they hit me with 15 charges. None of them to do with the trouble with lynching in the South, none of them to do with the painted savages of England, none of them to do with Henry Ford’s, the International Jew. 15 charges on completely different podcasts this time!

So from an original start of Hope Not Hate, saying we were promoting System Resistance Network in podcasts, which we weren’t, and an MP then saying to the police:

“Will you investigate this organisation please, or whatever it is.

Radio Ayran at the time. To the police wanting to charge me on these other podcasts that they found, these audiobooks that I gave them an interview about.

And then they obviously decided:

“No, we won’t charge him for that. We’ll charge him for 15 completely different podcasts that we haven’t mentioned at all in the three hour interview.”

I gave them. So it’s all extremely strange. It’s like as if they couldn’t find a problem with what it is alleged that I’d done. They couldn’t find podcasts saying that we supported System Resistance Network, so they thought:

“Well, we’ll let the police have a go.”

And the police said I had accounted for myself very well. And they didn’t charge me with what the police had asked me about.

And then they come up with these 15 other charges! Which which seems to me as if they’re saying:

“Well, he was able to answer the police. Let’s see if he can answer a barrister these questions?”

Going to Court in 2023

top

So I’m now going to be going to court. It’s two weeks that this is supposed to be going on for. As I say, I have not got a hateful bone in my body. There is certainly not any intent to incite hate and the only way you could misconstrue things to claim that we were trying to incite hate is to take things out of context.

What I mean by that is to take things away from a website which makes it very clear that the solutions we are outlining are solutions to multiculturalism. And hide that from the jury, and then show the jury podcasts, which talk about things like Enoch Powell’s “Rivers of Blood” speech, and highlight the bits from that that have actually come true today. And then say:

“Oh, he’s doing this because he wants to encourage people to hate non-Whites and to resent non-Whites!”

Why Waste Energy on Hating Non-Whites?

top

And of course, that’s not the reason. What would be the point in doing that? What would be the point in getting people to waste their energy on hating non-Whites or trying to do something to non-Whites? It’s not non-Whites that are responsible for the government’s policy, is it? It’s the government! You’re never going to get changes made to government policy by taking out your frustrations on immigrants or minorities or illegal asylum seekers. It’s just ridiculous! They’re not the ones that are making these government policies that are having these negative effects. It’s the government! And we’ve always been really clear about that.

[18:17]

And if you talk about differences that people have, inbuilt differences, you’re effectively saying:

“You can’t really hold these people to blame for that.”

If you’re saying:

“Well, you’ve got one people group here that has a lower average intelligence and higher rate of incarceration.”

You don’t hate those people. You feel sorry for them! And you say:

“Well, perhaps you should be a little bit more lenient on them. The fact is that they carry out more crime because they’ve got a lower IQ and they can’t change that. That’s the way they are.”

And in actual fact, that is a defense, isn’t it? In America, if you got a low IQ, you can’t actually be executed for your crimes. It’s a mitigating factor.

And if you also have a group which is more likely to commit crime, it means it’s more likely to be the victims of crime. And you’re not saying everyone in the group is a criminal, you’re just saying that they have more than their fair share of criminals in that group. And even by saying it like that, they have more than their fair share. You’re going to feel sorry for the ones that aren’t because they’re going to have to put up with the ones that are! There’s going to be a lot of law abiding people in that group, but they’re going to have to put up with a lot of unlawful criminal types in that group.

So you’re not going to hate them, are you? You’re going to cut them a bit of slack and you’re going to feel sorry for them.

Another way you’re going to look at it is, well, if they’ve had that, they’ve always had that and they will be the ones best placed to know how to deal with that.

Our System was Built for Whites, Not Non-Whites with Low IQ

top

And that’s why we get these problems today. That’s why black people will say:

“The White man’s legal system penalises us, it’s racist. More of us end up in prison. It doesn’t work for us!”

And they’re quite right, it doesn’t work for them, because it’s not their system. Because they didn’t develop that system. That system was developed for a group with a certain average of crimes, with a certain average of IQ. That’s what that system was developed for. That’s why it seems to people that don’t have that same IQ don’t have that same average of crimes, it seems like they’re being picked on because of the system.

Whereas if they were just amongst their own people, it wouldn’t happen, would it? They wouldn’t be able to say:

“Well, it’s racist against me!”

Because the system would have been developed by black people and it would have been Instituted by black people.

[20:35]

And this is what we see. We see particularly black people, but all non-Whites saying that they want to see themselves represented. And you see that when you see non-Whites accepting awards like the Oscars. And they say:

“Well, I’m doing this for all the younger versions of me that never saw themselves represented on the screen, never had somebody to look up to, never had somebody to show them that it is possible to get to these positions.”

Tension Created When You Have Multiculturalism

top

And that’s the same for everyone! Everyone wants to see themselves represented. Everybody feels most contented and comfortable when they are around their own people. And everybody feels slightly on edge when they’re among another group of people with a different culture and different languages. It just means that everybody is in a sense of heightened tension when you have multiculturalism.

So you see groups like Black Lives Matter advocating for more black judges, more black teachers, more black police, and that’s the reason why they want that it’s because if they were just surrounded by their own people, they couldn’t then say:

“This system is racist!”

They couldn’t then blame White people for it. And the chances are they would develop a system which actually dealt with the problems. They would probably develop a way that had a much swifter execution of justice than the way that we have, where you can end up waiting one, two, three years before you actually go to court.

There’s also the fact that a lot of black people will refuse to plead guilty anyway because they think that there’s a chance that they’ll be found not guilty. So even if there’s a lot of evidence against them, they will still plead not guilty, which can lead to them getting longer prison sentences.

You Can’t Change Blacks, Muslims or Jews

top

Again, it’s because the system was developed by White people and it’s been applied to black people. That’s the root of the problem. You can’t change black people!

It’s the same with jews! You can’t change jews! Jews have been jews for thousands of years. That’s the way they are, and it serves them very well. It has meant that they have retained their ethnic uniqueness. It means that they have retained their ethnicity whilst being a minority amongst the majority. They have retained their ways of doing things and their separate religion, and they’ve done very well without having physical force. They’ve managed to gain the same amount of influence and power as the majority has.

So you can’t say that what jews are doing is wrong for jews. It’s good for jews. But there may be aspects of it that aren’t so good for other groups in a society when it’s multicultural and it’s shared with jews. For instance, things like usury. That’s good for the jews, that is good for them to make money for their own group with, and they refuse to engage in usury amongst each other.

[23:33]

But if you’re a non-jew and you’re paying usury, you can end up getting yourself into debt. It’s not so good for you!

You can look at Muslims. You can say:

“Well, Muslims really don’t like to see images.”

They see pretty much all images as idols and particularly not images of Muhammad. And that’s fine. If they don’t want to see images, they don’t want to see images of Muhammad, that’s fine. That’s part of their culture. It has served them very well for thousands of years, or over a thousand years, I should say.

But then if you put them into a territory with another group that does like images, does like pictures, does like drawing cartoons, you’re going to have friction, aren’t you? Because you can have one group that says:

“Well, this is really offensive. It’s so offensive to me that you’ve got this picture of Muhammad there, that some of us may even think that that requires a death penalty. It’s that serious!”

Yet then you have Christians who are quite happy to draw pictures of Jesus, quite happy to draw pictures of Muhammad.

So you have this conflict there! Because not everybody is the same. And you can’t say, well, the Muslims are wrong for thinking that because I’m not a Muslim, I can’t judge Muslims.

The only way you can judge a group is by whether it’s actions are conducive for that group. Are jews thriving? You have to say:

“Yes, jews are thriving!”

Are Muslims thriving? Yes, Muslims are thriving. Are black people thriving? Yes. There are more black people alive today than there’s ever been alive before in history. They most certainly are thriving!

Other Groups are Thriving but Not Whites

top

Are White people thriving? Well, no, we’re not thriving, are we? We’re not even producing enough to replace ourselves. And that’s the root of the problem. The criticism is of White people! And the criticism is of the multicultural policy. The criticism is not of these other groups and we are not encouraging hatred of these other groups.

A few years ago, we may have used folk taxonomy, we may have used some language that people might find a little bit offensive, but it’s no different to the language that you would hear down the pub just from people talking about things and talking about these different groups. We do shorten people’s names for these groups. We call the Scottish people, we call them Scots.

And people did used to shorten the word that we used to call people from Asia. No offence is meant by it. It’s just shortening a word. And that is what they’re going to try and use to say I’m inciting hate, is because I use just normal language to describe these things rather than politically corrected language. Not because I was actually encouraging people to go out and attack non-Whites or anything like that, but simply because I used language which wasn’t particularly “polite”.

I mean, that’s the situation that we are at today.

[26:36]

The Law Against Incitement to Hate – Legislating Against an Emotion

top

If you want to have a law against incitement to hate, okay, but what is the point of that law? Well, that law is there to prevent people encouraging others to have a feeling of hatred that is so much and so strong that they might go out and physically attack someone. That has to be the sort of hate that they’re talking about, because otherwise the law is being used to try and legislate against an emotion. And say:

“Oh no! You can’t feel hate!”

Well, everybody feels hate. The point of the matter is, is it hatred to a sufficient extent that would make you want to go out and hurt someone? That’s the point. It has to be that that’s what the law was intended. It was to prevent people from inciting that sort of a hatred, not simply using terms that some people might find impolite or some people might find offensive. And that is going to be more likely to make the listeners hate the person saying those terms. It’s not going to make people want to go out and harm black people.

You’ll Only Be Listening to This If It All Goes Wrong!

top

Anyway, I’ve got a lot of noise outside now. What I wanted to do was to let everybody know what had happened, how this came about. It was nothing to do with Patriotic Alternative. As I say, it goes back to 2017 really. And you’ll only be listening to this if it all goes wrong! Hopefully it doesn’t go wrong and hopefully I get found not guilty.

If they do find me guilty and you are listening to this, I have made arrangements so that Radio Albion should continue with the Orthodox Nationalist Parish of the Patriots and Patriotic Alternative. So do stay checking out the website because there will be new content on there.

Okay, thank you very much for listening. And I will be back with you when I next can be. God bless and hail victory!

[28:32]

END

top

============================================

Comments

top

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in post = 5,280
Total words in transcript = 4806
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB): (Available later)

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3: Sat, May 20, 2023 – Added Table of Contents with links.

Version 2: Fri, May 19, 2023 — Minor corrections.

Version 1: Thu, May 18, 2023 — Published post.

Actual Justice Warrior – BLM Riots Destroyed Minneapolis Forever – May 5, 2023 – Transcript

admin — Sat, 06 May 2023 02:39:59 +0000

Actual Justice Warrior

BLM Riots Destroyed

Minneapolis Forever

Fri, May 5, 2023

[Activist Justice Warrior discusses the damage that blacks and their facilitators cause to themselves and law-abiding people, such as shop owners, when they riot. He says:

“In this video I discuss a viral TikTok video that shows the absolute devastation that was the BLM riots of 2020. I discuss how the riots were worse than you ever imagined & how the areas where they occurred will likely never recover.”

The long-term answer, of course, is: “Back to Africa!”

–KATANA]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igaNHN9UDWY

Published on Fri, May 5, 2023

Description

0:00 / 17:33
BLM Riots DESTROYED Minneapolis FOREVER
Actual Justice Warrior
234K subscribers
Join
Subscribe
8.5K
Share
Thanks
Clip
Save
108,953 views
May 5, 2023 #BLMRiots #Minneapolis #IamSean90
In this video I discuss a viral TikTok video that shows the absolute devastation that was the BLM riots of 2020. I discuss how the riots were worse than you ever imagined & how the areas where they occurred will likely never recover
Website: https://www.actualjusticewarrior.com/
https://linktr.ee/ActualJustice
Odysee: https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarr…
Rumble: https://rumble.com/ActualJusticeWarrior
Instagram NEW: https://www.instagram.com/actualjustice/
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/actualjusticewa…
Utreon: https://utreon.com/c/ActualJusticeWar…
2nd Channel:
/ ajw2dreamscometrue
TeeSpring Store: https://teespring.com/stores/actualju…
New Store: https://actualjusticewarrior.myspread…
Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/iamsean90
Parler: https://parler.com/profile/Actualjust…
https://www.minds.com/actualjusticewa…
Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SeanFitzgerald
Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/Iamsean90
Venmo: https://venmo.com/iamsean90
Support me on Subscribe Star: https://www.subscribestar.com/seanfit…
Gab: https://gab.com/Iamsean90
Twitter https://twitter.com/iamsean90
Backup Twitter https://twitter.com/AJWSean
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/actualjustic…
Discord: https://discord.gg/c7PGFFp
3rd:
/ dudemonkeyhq
Get Storable Food: https://www.preparewithajw.com
Get Pocketnet: https://pocketnet.app/actualjusticewa…
Podcast Links:
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/1o0q86A…
Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast…
Google Podcast: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0…
Sources:
Video Of Before & After: https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/statu…
60’s Riots: https://www.kqed.org/lowdown/22779/up…
Korean Businesses Video:
• Korean Businesses…
LA Riots Impact: https://www.marketplace.org/2020/06/0…
LA Riots Viewed As Good: https://www.npr.org/2017/04/28/526085…
Trevor Noah Cheers Rioting:
• George Floyd, Min…
Brad Polumbo Article: https://fee.org/articles/george-floyd…
Insurance didn’t Cover Demolition: https://www.claimsjournal.com/news/na…
Debate With Polumbo:
• Brad debates Actu…
Large Woman Cheers Destruction Of Minority Areas Performance Art:
• #BLM How Can We W…
#BLMRiots #Minneapolis #IamSean90
FAIR USE NOTICE
This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
3,539 Comments

_____________

TRANSCRIPT QUALITY = 5 Stars

NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(17:33 mins)

AJW: So we are right now coming up on the nearly three year anniversary of the death of George Floyd and the subsequent riots that absolutely devastated this country. And that devastation was concentrated in a lot of specific areas that we still have yet to recover from. And honestly, we have a long way in order to deal with the fallout of these Black Lives Matter riots.

And in light of this, I actually stumbled upon a video that showed different areas of Minneapolis, the city where George Floyd passed away, and the subsequent damage to all these different buildings comparing 2020 to how it looks today.

And I think this is very instructive because one of the things that I was saying at the time and a lot of people who weren’t just pandering to rioters and endorsing violence, breaking the social contract of our country, by the way were saying, was that:

“The riots are going to cause damage, drive the area into poverty and create all the problems that supposedly systemic racism are creating in the United States of America based on this behavior.”

And by the way, this wasn’t theoretical. This wasn’t hypothetical. It is inarguable that riots, specifically race riots, completely obliterate an area. I remember I talked about how the Martin Luther King riots were responsible for the death of Detroit. They never recovered from that, and Martin Luther King was killed in the 60s.

I also talked about this study of the LA Riots, the Rodney King riots from the 90s, which said:

“That it took nearly a decade for the areas where the rioting occurred to get back to where they were previous.”

Which still made them a decade behind everybody else. There was about $5 billion in lost economic activity. And there was actually a side by side comparison in one of the studies to that area of Los Angeles versus what happened in an area in Florida where they were. Hit by a storm and a similar dollar amount of damage happened and how quickly Reinvestment came back to Florida as compared to these specific areas of California.

So everybody knew rioting was devastating. Everybody knew that it was immoral. It was unjustified. Oftentimes these race riots target innocent victims.

In fact, almost all the time, they target innocent victims and businesses. As we talked about what they did to the Koreans in the LA Riots.

Woman (Korean): Why are we, the victims? 42 years down the drain! [Iron law of the (urban) jungle. Naggers will be naggers!]

Reporter (female): Many Koreans who yesterday were the shopkeepers of south central Los Angeles today have lost the businesses they took years to create.

Man (Korean): What can I say? I don’t have any word to say.

Reporter (female): George Huang woke this morning to find his mini mall burned to the ground. A loss of a million and a half dollars. And a lifetime of dreams and effort.

Man (Korean): I don’t mind that. Whatever they need to take it out. But why they blown out the property, that’s my question?

[03:00]

AJW: You know, every once in a while, when I cover instances that I’ve talked about before, like for instance, the damage to the Koreans during the LA Riots, I stumble upon some new information that I haven’t heard before that I have to share with you. And this MBR article [Apr 28, 2017] has an absolute gem. Because one of the things that the black people in the area thought at the time was that they were going to directly benefit from the destruction of the 2, 200 Korean businesses that occurred during the LA Riots.

From an unidentified Woman:

“Five to ten years from now, this place is going to be so nice. All this down here is going to be black-owned business. She’s going to have a nail shop. She’s going to have a beauty shop. It’s going to be our turn. It’s our turn now.”

AJW: Unidentified man number three:

“If you start to transfer ownership of the community to the community, everyone will prosper.”

And what I think about when I see quotes like this, obviously it didn’t work out. Obviously I’m covering articles that not only say it took ten years to get back to regular sales, but actually three decades later, these areas haven’t recovered. Or the people in my audience that I’ve met that happen to be black, that clearly and obviously don’t think like this, that want to prosper, that understand that they are not up against any other group. They are only competing with themselves. And how they’re essentially held hostage despite the fact that they’re good people by people like this and by attitudes like this.

It’s honestly heartbreaking to read how stupid people are. And it’s unsurprising when you look back at the LA Riots and how people thought they would benefit from them because it was going to be all black businesses from there, that people did support the George Floyd riots.

Man (black): I’m not surprised that the Koreans got targeted because their prices are high, their attitude is wrong, and they just don’t seem to have any respect for the black community.

AJW: And of course, the Black Lives Matter riots were no different, except for the fact that they were more destructive than any other riots in American history.

Now, this video has some copyrighted music, so I’m going to be talking over it so that way you could see it. But really it’s the imagery that I want you to see, and I will be describing it for the podcast listeners. It will be linked in the description if you want to watch it in full. That is quite stark comparing 2020 to current year because entire blocks are completely eviscerated by the Black Lives Matter riots.

[05:28]

So the first thing that is shown is one of the police stations of many that were attacked by Black Lives Matter rioters.

And as you can see, the building looks like it was actually bombed by a foreign country.

In fact, I’ve seen bomb attacks from Russia against Ukraine that have done less damage than what we’re seeing right here. It’s absolutely devastating! And symbolically, them destroying the headquarters of the police really let’s, you know, that lawlessness has taken over Minneapolis.

And by the way, homicide rate, all time highs! All these other problems which are effects of them driving themselves into poverty through this criminality also are everlasting consequences. But this perfect example of it and you get the premise of the video, they pan one way, then they pan back, and you see what it looks like today.

So right here you see a liquor store. It’s completely burned up. Again, I’ve seen less damage in war zones than what looks like happened in this area. And it’s absolutely devastated. These are just the rioting and the looting and all the effects that was supposedly called “civil rights protesting” in the year 2020, and how it absolutely devastated the area.

But the devastation is going to be more significant. Check this out.

Now, even though in this particular instance, the building itself doesn’t look like it was completely obliterated, what I really want you to focus on is the signage before they cut to how it looked post the riots, because I think that is infinitely more telling.

We had a Denny’s on the corner, another store with a green sign right next to it. And the whole first floor of this building appeared to be different varieties of shops and whatnot. And almost all of them are gone. All of these businesses, all of these jobs, the people who used to come and shop here, hang out here, eat here and all that, no longer have these places. And it’s replaced with this boarded up, tagged up, absolute degradation of a community.

And I just want you to realize that those businesses likely aren’t coming back.

So here we have a Popeyes Chicken, and honestly controversial take. I actually prefer the Popeyes Spicy Chicken sandwich to the Chick-fil-A one. Go ahead, skewer me in the comments! But guess what? The conversation is irrelevant because the Popeyes Chicken that was there gone completely! The building’s just obliterated! It’s just gone. They torched it. It had to be torn down. It was condemned. Popeye’s Chicken absolutely obliterated, according to this video.

Here we have another restaurant. I believe it’s called The Perkins. I’ve never heard of it. Could be a chain, could be a local to the area. But like I said before in that video of the building, what is important here is not necessarily the fact that you’re going to see it boarded up, but what I think is important is the fact that the signage is completely removed. The business has left! This is not a situation where they boarded up because of the rioting. This is a situation where the building is completely abandoned. And it’s boarded up to keep the addicts out. Maybe it’s going to be torn down in the future, but point being, no business replaced what was lost.

Now we have a building like one of the ones that we saw earlier, and you can see a bunch of different shops on the first floor, but the stark difference between what you see initially and after this, again, harkens back to images of wartime.

[08:44]

Now, I have to say, this speedway is my absolute favorite of all the ones here, because the gas station is completely obliterated.

But as you can see, it’s written:

“Where there’s people, there’s power!”

Well, guess what? You devastated your community! There’s no people here. So you quite literally destroyed the power in that gasoline is a power source, and no people are going to this gas station. It looks sketchy as hell. And you just ruined it. You ruined your entire community, supposedly for civil rights.

And then we wrap with the Family Dollar, also torn down.

And it’s at this point in time that I want to remind you that Trevor Noah over at The Daily Show was making the case during the Black Lives Matter riots when people were saying:

“You shouldn’t loot Target. That not looting target hasn’t worked, so maybe we should try that?”

Trevor Noah: And a lot of people say, well, what good does this do? Yeah, but what good doesn’t it do? That’s the question people don’t ask the other way around. What good does it do to loot Target? How does it help you to loot Target? Yeah, but how does it help you to not loot Target? Answer that question!

AJW: And again, Trevor Noah was just one of many people who were saying these ridiculous things at the time, excusing the riots. When we had all of the data, everybody could see what was happening. Everybody could predict it to show that this is exactly how areas impacted by rioting would turn out to be.

Family Dollar completely wiped off the board. Speedway wiped out. Gas stations wiped out.

I still remember, and I’ll never forget it, when we had a story of this group, I think they were religious, bringing in diapers and baby formula and vegetables and food to the area to support the Black Lives Matter riders because they had destroyed every single grocery store in the area! There was no place for the people to actually get diapers for their kids, just a few days into the Black Lives Matter rioting. And this area has not recovered.

[10:31]

And by the way, I want to give credit to Brad Palumbo, who actually was on his channel a long time ago, to discuss “qualified immunity”, which, by the way, we completely disagreed on for writing this amazing article talking about the cost of the Black Lives Matter riots, because one of the things that you often hear is this $2 billion number. That the Black Lives Matter riots were the most expensive riots in American history because they cost this country 2 billion in damages.

And as Brad points out in this fantastic article, which will be linked in full in the description, that $2 billion number is only the number for insured losses! So this is what was actually reimbursed to retailers and to homeowners and to affected parties based on the Black Lives Matter riot.

But as Brad pointed out, insurance is not this silver bullet against the downsides of rioting. 75% of US. Businesses do not have the adequate insurance in order to deal with something like riots. And 40% of small businesses don’t have any insurance at all. So all of their losses don’t show up in that $2 billion figure.

And to give you a bit of a refresher on this, if you’ll remember a lot of people who own small businesses that did have insurance, but it didn’t cover the absolute obliteration of entire blocks that was caused by these Black Lives Matter rioters, found out that they could only get about $25,000 in order to destroy their condemned building in order to prevent them from being fined further by the city. That was what their insurance covered. And there was case after case after case of this just out of the city of Minneapolis.

Well, this was something that happened nationwide. And those businesses that had no insurance that should have been perfectly fine, they’re gone. They’re done! There was no rehabilitation for them. There was no compensation for them. There was nobody to sue. They were just left devastated. And that’s what we’re seeing across the city.

And again, this is just Minneapolis. This is just the epicenter of the Black Lives Matter riots. Make no mistake, these riots occurred all over the country, and we’re still seeing the effects in closings, businesses not recovered, no new building in these areas, and of course, in high rates of violent crime, huge spikes in certain areas, some places getting record crime spikes. And it’s just horrific!

And what I can’t emphasize enough is that we knew that this was the consequence of these actions. We had the la. Riots as an example. We had the Martin Luther King riots as an example. And yet, time after time on channel after channel, we got defenses of rioting. We got excuses of rioting!

And one of the ones that I’ll never forget circulated widely online and was actually played on John Oliver’s Last Week Tonight, which was this overweight woman, this Black Lives Matter activist, talking about how:

“We don’t own anything, and it’s okay because you deserve it, and you actually broke the social contract!”

Whatever, justify the rioting. And look at where these areas are now.

[13:29]

Woman (black): So I’ve been seeing a lot of things, talking of the people making commentary. Interestingly enough, the ones I’ve noticed that have been making the commentary are wealthy black people. Making the commentary about we should not be rioting, we should not be looting, we should not be tearing up our own communities.

And then there’s been an argument of the other side of we should be hitting them in the pocket. We should be focusing on the blackout days where we don’t spend money. But I feel like we should do both.

So when they say, ‘Why do you burn down the community? Why do you burn down your own neighborhood?’ It’s not ours! We don’t own anything! We don’t own anything! Trevor Noah said it so beautifully last night. There’s a social contract that we all have! That if you steal or if I steal, then the person who is the authority comes in and they fix the situation. But the person who fixes the situation is killing us!

So the social contract is broken! And if the social contract is broken, why the fuck do I give a about burning Football Hall of Fame, about burning up Target?

AJW: And unsurprisingly that large woman who was just yelling for the cameras, doing this performance art, was not negatively impacted by the Black Lives Matter riots? You think she shops at Family Dollar? You think she shops at Target? You think she goes to any of those small businesses that are in Minneapolis? Absolutely not! John Oliver. No impact! Trevor Noah. No impact! Black Lives matter. The organization, no accountability! They got tons and tons of money based on the hysteria.

In fact, the only downside for Black Lives Matter was that certain individuals set up charities with BLM in the name and were able to divert some of the money from the official scam that is Black Lives Matter.

Kamala Harris who actually tweeted out a bail fund for these rioters to destroy this area even further. Vice president!

So when you see videos of the devastation like the one that I showed you throughout the course of this video, when you wonder where your stores are, why your neighborhoods look like crap, why poverty is increasing in this area, and how it’s being driven by the crime that it’s actually feeding into as well, just remember, it wasn’t me. It wasn’t Conservatives, it wasn’t the police, it wasn’t the evil White racists. It wasn’t the ghost of White supremacy past.

It was Democratic elites! Democratic politicians, mainstream media, pundits! So-called comedians that speak with a voice of the people. The Black Lives Matter organization and all these other people who knew for a fact that this kind of behavior would have long term devastating economic consequences for the people, allegedly, that they’re trying to advocate for, that not only excused this, but cheered it on, supported it, told you:

“You know what? This thing that has never worked throughout American history, that has only caused irreparable damage to the communities where it’s happened called race riots. Maybe give that a try and it will work this time!”

That’s why Minneapolis is garbage! That’s why they have a record homicide rate. That’s why all these areas across this country are getting significantly worse.

[16:33]

It’s because you allowed the violence, you allowed the looting, you allowed the rioting to commence, and you pretended like the consequences were something that you were just going to be able to ignore.

Well, you can’t ignore it. We’re three years in, and Minneapolis has still not recovered. And guess what? Ten years from now, they likely still won’t have recovered.

Now, maybe you think it’s worth it. Maybe you think you honored “St. George Floyd” by stealing all that stuff and burning the businesses that your community relied on. But I’m going to have to hard disagree on that and say that you ruined your own lives! You ruined your own communities, you ruined some great American cities. And honestly, we should have some accountability for the people who profited off of promoting this, but we’re never going to get it.

But hey, those are just my thoughts.

So let me know your thoughts down in the comments below. If you like the video, show them by leaving a like, subscribe for more content, follow me on all my social medias. Support me via the support links in the description of this video. This has been me talking about yet again the Black Lives Matter riots, completely devastating this country!

Till next time.

[17:33]

END

top

============================================

YouTube Comments

top

(Comments as of 5/5/2023 = 3,539)

[Note: Not all comments posted here.]

@richardg1426
8 hours ago (edited)
Why has not BLM and ANTIFA rebuilt these areas and created high paying jobs ?
1.4K

168 replies

@hobsdigree2
6 hours ago
Sean left out the best part. Those riots occured when we were told to stay quarentined, otherwise we were science deniers. But rioting, looting, and burning the community down was acceptable.
311

18 replies

@ridemywheelie
6 hours ago
Back in the day, there was genuine sympathy from the media towards the victims. Now it has switched to sympathy for the rioters
194

7 replies

@brianmorger2174
4 hours ago
And not a single word of restraint from a Democrat politician while the destruction was happening.
37

4 replies

@whoathatsanicememe3093
7 hours ago
I will never forget seeing an elderly black woman crying in front of a CVS or some other drugstore that had been destroyed right after the riots because she couldn’t get her medication that helps keep her alive.
I often wonder what happened to her.
It’s a real shame that the people that did this can’t see the devastation they caused affects the people that they supposedly love.
299
Actual Justice Warrior

42 replies

@bigredauto6774
5 hours ago
Born and raised in Minnesota. My dad was a Minneapolis police officer. Thank God he retired before this mess. I loved Minneapolis. That Target was a store I new well. This City was at it’s peak of safety and cleanliness in the 2010s. Now it isn’t safe for anyone. The people with money are protected, the middle class has left, and the poor are fending for themselves. Block E is dead compared to pre pandemic. Homeless is bad. Nicollet mall is dangerous, and police are down to patrol numbers only meaning no investigation units. Meaning no, crimes are being solved. If you don’t commit your crime in front of a uniformed officer, you’re likely to get away with it.
23

2 replies

@breecegriffith5896
8 hours ago
It’s a movement that is only used in specific scenarios, does not actually care about who they are supposedly protesting for, and ignores the vast amount of crimes perpuated by those very same people they are “trying” to support. It should never have been a thing.
466

22 replies

@vidcas1711
8 hours ago
I happened to move out of Minneapolis in 2019 and even planned on moving back at some point. I unironically thank God every so often that I moved out of the city when I did, and have absolutely no desire to go back.
The fact that the city actually decided to cut back the police after all of the rioting and continued BLM support after all of this rioting is utter insanity. The city government and a lot of people cucked themselves to woke ideology as far as I’m concerned.
It’s a shame too considering how beautiful and generally pleasant it was to live there before the politics became r-tarded.
74

4 replies

@garyodle5663
6 hours ago
I live in Minneapolis and I remember people in my neighborhood supporting the burning, looting, and destruction … as long as it wasn’t done here in our neighborhood. Their support of the rioting was absolutely immoral.
236
Actual Justice Warrior

8 replies

@facts-hurt-feelings8318
4 hours ago
Awesome comparisons, man. I Just discovered you and really like how you revisit and chain together these events. Certain black people celebrating the demise of other races businesses in their own community, gloating and professing to make everything black owned and prosperous, is really the epitome of racism. The racism that they so often claim is the cause of all their own problems. The irony…
14

@davidpeterson9550
8 hours ago
All those business should have sued the city or governor who held the cops back and let it happen. Trump offered help and they refused to take it.
309

19 replies

@funkyboda
5 hours ago
As a white guy who grew up in London in a predominantly black area , the best thing I ever did was move away from them..
I now live in an area which is mostly white and wow what difference, hardly any crime ,clean streets and peaceful people!!
Scott Adams is so right!!
48

2 replies

@treborkroy5280
8 hours ago
How do these riots not meet the definition of domestic terrorism?
418

44 replies

@bandman83
7 hours ago
As a black person, I couldn’t move out of the ghetto fast enough. It’s not a race issue but rather culture. The communities are destroying themselves because the families have no values, standards, leadership, and fathers. This doesn’t surprise me.
508

97 replies

@Vindicta0117
7 hours ago (edited)
I’ve lived in Minnesota for 21 years now and everything he’s said in this video is 1000000000% true. Most of the stores that were destroyed chose to not rebuild where they were but chose to move to nicer suburbs or they chose just not to rebuild at all.
81

2 replies

@jedbex7070
3 hours ago
There’s only one group of people that can do this every couple of decades and not get held accountable… now we have to ask do they fit in our society or is it time for us to move on?
15

@smythharris2635
6 hours ago
Over 30 years ago I had the misfortune to be at a university dinner table with 2 Minneapolis academics, naïve hardly begins to describe their misunderstanding of society.
40

1 reply

@GrizzlyTank
4 hours ago
“The person in charge of fixing the situation is killing us”
She almost gets it, she’s so close to the answer it’s painful.
19

@incurableromantic4006
8 hours ago
This is why it’s evil and pernicious to say “property damage isn’t violence”. Mass-destruction of property destroys prosperity, and that destroys people’s lives.
775

55 replies

@SGTDave
7 hours ago
I took my first trip to Minneapolis since the riots a few months ago. Buildings vandalized and boarded up, burnt out buildings, businesses buzzing in customers because they’re afraid to unlock the doors. It feels like a third world country now.
31

2 replies

@HeyJakFrost
3 hours ago
I lived and worked in the area when this happened. I just remember how hurt and angry I felt as I watched them burn my home city to the ground. I still hold heavy resentment in my heart. They turned people who would have had compassion for their cause against them.
13

@vaccinatedanti-vaxxer1820
6 hours ago
What’s so ironic is that when it comes to actions, the rioters are very individualistic but when it comes to identity they are very collective. What they do is reflective they do give a darn about anyone else even if that means destroying their own community, their needs and desires over everyone else, forget everyone’s experience, hurt, or rights. Meanwhile their identity as victims is collective. The fat woman said “we don’t own nothing!” Implying blacks can’t own anything because it’s other people’s fault. But why don’t she be the individual to make a change? Show her community blacks can make it to the top and inspire other blacks to follow her as the individual that got out of the cycle. But instead because she limit herself to being just black, just a victim she can’t think beyond her identity as a victim.
26

2 replies

@rayspencer8872
3 hours ago
I can’t say this enough….It’s Amazing how well our Country was Run by a Businesses Man and How Quickly a Career Politician has Destroyed it. Proven in History Got it Proven.
Need I Say More!
9

@robertmedinaphotography
4 hours ago
I was thinking how can people do this and the first thing that popped into my head was they do not pay taxes so they do not care. Really is a shame what this country has turned into.
7

1 reply

@Mitzoplick
8 hours ago (edited)
1 – destroy all the businesses.
2 – complain about “food deserts” and lack of investment
3 – complain about gentrification when investment begins
Even if businesses were replaced with “Black owned businesses” they would still get robbed and vandalized. When there is a culture of hating those that make better choices and succeed, there will not be progress. The core problem is not poverty, it is envy. It is people angry that someone else has something that they do not, regardless of how it was obtained. This is no different than out of shape people being envious of very in shape people, which easily turns into hatred. They are not willing to eat right and exercise, however.
I assume that at some level, the Black / Korean issue stems from the Black people in these neighborhoods being envious of the Koreans success, and the Koreans seeing the Black culture as too lazy to build these businesses themselves. Korean immigrants built businesses in the areas that it was most affordable to do so, because nobody else was doing it. The question to ask is, why are wealthy black people not investing heavily into building businesses in these neighborhoods? Because they are successful and realize that it is a terrible investment and will only get robbed and or destroyed.
542

51 replies

@Clownlife432
8 hours ago
Really liked this video. It’s important to look back at the results. Higher black on black crime, especially murder. More food deserts, less investment, less community.
41

2 replies

@DixieWhiskey
8 hours ago
Imagine having the menacing and destruction of your business be encouraged and handwaived by your local officials, only to be fined by those same officials because the building is now in ruin.
38

4 replies

@daniel5412
4 hours ago
I remember the first round of George Floyd riots in my area. Had a patient, older black guy, who had just been diagnosed with cancer and found out that night that his barbershop had been ransacked. They hurt the people in their own communities and don’t even seem to think about it.
7

@scar504
7 hours ago
There’s this girl I used to work with. She’d been passed around multiple stores and always had problems. Managers would treat her like crap. Bring out her personal business. We felt bad because we liked her and took her into our store. Well, 3 month, 6 months, 9 months, the more time passed the more issues began springing up; and eventually we pieced together that she was actually at the center of all these issues and then realized that we now felt how previous supervisors had felt when they allegedly mistreated her. Our compassion turned to annoyance as we came into agreement that she was actually the one bring all this trouble onto herself.
Now we watch her circle the drain in life and of course if you try to tell her about herself it’s somehow your fault, his fault, their fault. But somehow it’s never HER fault. Reminds me a of particular community of people..
64

3 replies

@cognitivedissident4880
4 hours ago
This is roughly the equivalent of setting your own house on fire to get revenge on people who live a mile away and never did anything to hurt you.
5

@robotempires
8 hours ago
I’m not conservative or hold conservative values, but it’s mind boggling how these guys are destroying their communities and being hailed as martyrs and heroes and yet melt down at jan 6 acting like it was 9/11.
242

37 replies

@notcrazy6288
8 hours ago
I had black friends on facebook who were completely ambivalent to the rioting, because ‘these stores have insurance’, and would open right back up again with no real loss to themselves. I guess the stores thought differently.
53

3 replies

@JA-ut8fi
7 hours ago
I still can’t believe I got in a huge debate with a Christian friend on Facebook with her defending the riots and me defending the community, she still couldn’t see the destruction of innocence and eventually blocked me. Saying stuff like insurance will cover it, and if they didn’t have insurance to cover a once in a lifetime phenomenon then she believed they weren’t worthy of business in the first place cuz they didn’t have adequate litigation I guess. Crazy.
21

5 replies

@rebeccagray986
1 hour ago
I lived in the area and moved because I knew it couldn’t recover. Went through the area recently and it broke my heart to see such a disaster still waiting to be fixed.
1

@t.b.a.r.r.o.
6 hours ago
The riots in the 60s ruined Camden NJ.
Over night large areas of the city were abandoned. Once the emptys were stripped of their wiring, plumbing, and other infrastructure… There was no going back.
20

1 reply

@jacklucas7265
5 hours ago
I must say your video was exceptionally well done. As a corollary to this; many cities have DA’s that don’t enforce the laws against shoplifting, the effect has been, as was easily foreseen, the stores close and the patrons who paid for their purchases now must travel far to buy what they need.
3

@skiman863
8 hours ago
13% of the population, but 90% of the problem.
369

51 replies

@reldoc
8 hours ago
Adults think: ‘What’s the worst that can happen if I do this?” There are cultures that never think like adults. They are governed by emotion and imagination, like 16-year-olds.
16

2 replies

@Jackie-zi2pq
7 hours ago
STILL FEEL SO SORRY FOR THE OFFICER JAILED. NO WAY SHOULD HE BE IN JAIL
32

@Godeias
5 hours ago
Black person from Minnesota here and I’ve been saying this since the riots started, but other Black people call me an Uncle Tom because I blame our culture for our problems more than other races.
11

2 replies

@louislee7717
8 hours ago
It’s scary to see. I used to work in the area and my business was destroyed. I went down a few times to aid with the cleanup and I never imagined that sort of thing would happen in Minneapolis.
16

@_TB3hnz
2 hours ago
You’re absolutely right when you say “we will never get accountability.”
The innate fear of consequences is a part of human nature.

@just_a_turtle_chad
9 hours ago
This is why stereotypes will always exist.
402

49 replies

@tearsofjoyforallthispain6160
8 hours ago
Actually all these people should sue state, local and federal government for not only allowing this to happen (they told police to stand down), but for going on TV/the internet and saying flat out to destroy/rob/burn everything down. They should also sue any celebrities that egged this on as well. We need some lawyers to help these people build their cases (or class action or whatever).
11

@winterlake4793
6 hours ago
I was thinking about one of my dad’s best friends, a man who in the early 1970s arrived in America from Armenia. He and his family worked hard and each had set aside and saved what little they could and combined that savings together and designated him, the oldest son, to be the one to send to America to work, pave the way, and build on that dream.
They were finally able to afford the plane ticket, the cost of traveling, and randomly chose Colorado as his final destination. He had $50. when he set foot in Colorado, 1 suitcase, and something similar to a fishing tackle box that contained the tools of his craft and skill, (which was making rings, jewelry), and approximately a dozen rings he had already made before his journey.
Because he only had $50. He couldnt afford hotels, he slept outside and rationed his $ for food.
Every day he would set up a tiny display of his rings on a blanket on the sidewalk on Pearl Street Mall, a popular outdoor shop street in Boulder Co. , and visited all the shops around to show them his rings to see if they might buy 1 or a few to sell at their shops.
Every ring he eventually sold he set the $ aside, and save, and then use that $ to afford to buy the material to craft another ring to sell.
He continued to do this, over the months and years profiting a little bit more to slowly build up an established business.
Eventually being able to afford to rent a room, in our family’s home, which is how we met him when he responded to the “room for rent ad.”
Eventually he was able to afford his own apartment. Eventually he was able to afford to pay for each of his family members still in Armenia, one by one, his wife, mother, sisters, to come to America.
They all worked hard together to build up his jewelry business. Living meagerly, humbly, saving, reinvesting into the business.
Eventually they were able to afford to rent a tiny shop space on Pearl Street Mall. They continued this cycle, method, sacrifice, and determination.
Today, he, his family, his children, are all now multimillionaires, owning and operating jewelry shops, cafes, clothing stores.
I have SO much admiration, awe, and respect for this man, that he was able to do this with merely $50. and a skill that he honed throughout the years all by himself (no formal training or higher education), and massive determination and discipline to his goal and dream. Being Armenian in the 1970s and 80s in Colorado, and struggling to learn english and adjust to our culture, he endured a lot of prejudice, and obstacles, but he was always so happy spirited, grateful, and driven. Truly an amazing and inspirational man.
Whenever we come upon difficult times i think about him, and that if he can do something like that, then surely i should be able to figure my way through each of my challenges.
I’ll never be a millionaire, and i actually dont aspire to be, I’m content and thankful with the humble but blessed life God has appointed for our little family, including the difficulties that arise now and then.
I know this is a long story/comment, but hopefully, maybe, it might inspire someone. Just a little example of how much the human spirit is capable of
44

5 replies

@pads-zr9ln
4 hours ago (edited)
3 years sober, well done george, you finally provided for your family
4

@saidtweini1422
7 hours ago
I’ll never forget those darling days and those who perpetuated those destructive, chaotic lies. I’m even more blackpilled by the fact that none of those politicians or institutionalist experts (schools with social justice departments) that supported and justified the looting and rioting will never be held accountable for their destructive words.
26

1 reply

@Bill_Cosby717
4 hours ago
as somebody that lives 10 minutes from Minneapolis, since said riots, I have outright refused to participate in anything to do with the location, no shopping, dining, or attractions period
3

@chriskola3822
8 hours ago
“How does it help you to not loot Target”
What a take. He should face “incitement of violence” charges.
Poverty doesn’t cause crime, crime causes poverty.
425

29 replies

@zach8019
8 hours ago
Trevor’s logic could be used to excuse Murder or any sort of crime.
I have never heard sutch a juvenile take on crime.
22

@zardox78
8 hours ago
People have this notion that “insurance” is just this bottomless pit of money that’s gonna come in, wave their magic wand and take care of everything.
One time I let my tires get a little too bald and ended up losing control on a rainy day and hitting a curb really hard. No other car was involved. I had full coverage (because I hadn’t paid off the car yet), so my insurance paid for the repairs. And then my rates went sky high for the next several years. I ended up paying them back at least 3 times what they had to pay out for me. Insurance companies are basically legal loan shark organizations with a hell of lot of patience… because they can afford to be patient.
23

6 replies

@user-ue8vz3km9c
6 hours ago
I’ll never understand why people destroy their own community.
4

2 replies

@jackmcslay
8 hours ago
“We want to drive out the koreans so that the people of our own skin color will prosper” sounds a lot like 1930s Germany to me.
82

10 replies

@Cfault9
6 hours ago
You said it right but the sad part is the people that need to understand it will never look up from their trance.

@incurableromantic4006
9 hours ago
Something that might help prevent this is if there were no more Federal funds provided to rebuild if the city didn’t try to stop those riots.
117

10 replies

@bentencho
7 hours ago
“If you start to transfer the ownership of the community to the community….” pretty much just accusing that those Koreans weren’t part of the community. Just a more polite way to justify racism.
18

1 reply

@dansmith1661
8 hours ago
Immediately after this happened, there was a Stop Asian Hate, which completely ignored naming the haters and the hate never stopped.
22

1 reply

@cleenlivin
54 minutes ago
I had the opportunity to live in the Twin Cities in the mid 90’s. Coming from a large city already I really like the small town feel of St. Paul and small city feel of Minneapolis. At that time I can remember how clean and well kept the two cities were and the nice downtown Minneapolis had. The Skyway system, Prince’s Club, many cool lakes, parks and laidback feel. Sad to see such a nice city self-destruct.

@stuartegrin7543
8 hours ago
love the logic spoken by the woman – if I/we don’t own something then it is okay to burn it down to the ground simply brilliant
18

@kingkoua1
5 hours ago (edited)
To add on to that Denny’s photo, just a block away from it, they also completely burned down a strip of multiple story buildings. One of which was an Indian restaurant that was one of my favorites to eat at, as they grew some their ingredients in house. They were featured on triple D and eventually relocated, so I’ve been told. On that same lake street if you drive about 10 minutes west going towards uptown, there are more buildings destroyed and burned down.
5

@peteredwards8737
1 day ago
I saw the original video of the knee-on-the-neck on the day after Floyd died. I thought it was shocking and disgusting. Then I heard about the fentanyl overdose. Then I saw the police video of the entire arrest sequence. Floyd said he couldn’t breathe when they first tried to put him in the police car like 20 minutes before he died. Then I heard difficulty breathing is a symptom of a drug overdose. Then I heard about the knee-on-the-neck being part of police training. Then the riots started. Then everybody starting lying about it all. People like Ana of TYT still lie about it and say it was murder. The cops were all charged with murder or some variation of accessory to murder. The ONLY shocking and disgusting thing is the scale of the lies and the damage they caused. The USA is a broken country.
571

100 replies

@Maxtastic101
7 hours ago
My favorite post on Facebook was everyone saying, “don’t tell others HOW to grieve.” Note to self… for every death in the family or community, it’s ok to burn down a family dollar!
13

1 reply

@kp4588
8 hours ago
I have a niece currently in Minneapolis on an ecclesiastical mission. I pray for her safety every day.
7

@KevvUploads
6 hours ago
this is one of your most important videos sean.
3

@gregmatz3693
6 hours ago
It’s good to see someone who knows the real truth.
5

@LonelyWendigo
2 hours ago
“Those who fail to understand the past, are destined to repeat it.”

@Mr_Fairdale
8 hours ago
I have family in Minneapolis. They still don’t get it. They’ll complain about how much the city has changed since summer of 2020, how they can’t go to certain places now or ride their bikes because of crime or how they get their cars broken into. But boy oh boy do they not want to hear my opinions on their local politicians and how BLM ruined their city. They get so mad and just keep repeating the same white liberal rhetoric over and over. Maybe one day they’ll figure it out.
143

18 replies

@glenndicus
8 hours ago (edited)
My grandfathers boyhood home in Long Beach, now shoreline crip territory. My dad’s boyhood home is now rolling 60’s and 50’s crip territory. All my siblings have left Los Angeles and I’m left alone in a primarily immigrant neighborhood.
For a hundred years they have been moving in and taking over by violence with the same mentality. Yet, I’m the problem.
10

1 reply

@therealfriday13th
8 hours ago
“You ruined your entire community. Supposedly for civil rights.”
That’s the really evil part of this tho, AJW: from what I remember, this destruction was mostly caused by outsiders who used the death as an excuse to destroy.
28

2 replies

@Techcensorshipbot
5 hours ago
Imagine living in a culture that tells you you’re a victim your entire life meanwhile a majority of crime is perpetrated by that same culture. Really slick mental gymnastics right there. Personal responsibility is difficult.
5

1 reply

@DaDa-kf4vp
8 hours ago
The Popeyes is the most shocking. That’s like if an Arab community burned down the only mosque in town.
23

2 replies

@libbyjensen1858
1 hour ago
As someone who lives very close to Minneapolis, I can tell you other cities had riot issues also and at least one of those other cities is dealing with the economic fall out as well.

@airman122469
8 hours ago
It’s amazing how short-sighted the rioters are.
50

7 replies

@brandonspencer6834
8 hours ago
Man what a lovely culture. So peaceful and understanding. No wonder everyone else wants to live around them. Businesses do so well in their communities.
17

@silverfox2086
6 hours ago (edited)
I saw the ’68 MLK riots as a boy on the near westside of Chicago. It was fiery and managed to destroy 90% of the businesses in the surrounding area. That capital has yet to be fully replaced, even after decades.
7

@zachborst4687
5 hours ago
Watching this is infuriating. The woman at 13:30 is totally convinced in her mind that she’s right.
1

@EL-ml5tl
7 hours ago
I live in a suburb of Minneapolis and hoping they don’t rebuild anything and those areas just self implode. I’m looking to get out because the crime continues at very high rates. You can actually see posts of groups of teenagers (almost always described as “BM”) rampaging all day at many different locations and cops don’t do a f*cking thing. We’ve even seen crime go up and increase in severity in the suburbs. I know many people that have moved or working to move out, MN and the Twin Cities are lost, there is no fixing this, Scott Adams is right in saying that.
6

@trevorjones1775
5 hours ago
I live in Minnesota used to work in Minneapolis during the riots I’m so happy I moved to buffalo away from that nightmare.
1

@sol-hunter2332
9 hours ago
When I see the long lasting effects of the riots, I can only think back to my “friends” who told me that I was cruel for caring about “things more than people” and that these business are insured. Smh
210

16 replies

@jeffreykempson7127
6 hours ago
The large woman should get an Oscar for that performance. Hey all those protests were peaceful. Oh the fires, they were just set to keep everyone warm.
7

@rahn45
8 hours ago
“You didn’t build that, so it’s okay if it burns down!”
– A President, probably.
11

@KimmiesK
2 hours ago
Unfortunately now we have this NYC subway incident, and things are already shaping up for history repeating itself… I totally see this exact scenario happening again… Some people have extremely short memories and no common sense…

@Joe-pc3hs
8 hours ago
I want to condemn those who partook in rioting from the 90’s on till today, but they’ve condemned themselves more than I ever could.
4

@brittisasome13
3 hours ago
Very well made and well informative video thank you!!

@williambarry8015
9 hours ago
I went through the riots of 92. We were allowed to defend ourselves back then at least.
108

4 replies

@uchi9
8 hours ago
I live in MN, I swear all the attractions and “fancy” tourism spot are there in Minneapolis.
But we seldom go there or the cities of st. Paul in general because of all the garbage vandalism and ghetto areas tainting the place; I don’t want to get jumped, robbed, or shot.
12

1 reply

@jantelliquawallace355
7 hours ago
Congrats on almost 3 years of sobriety George!
7

@dangander6771
1 hour ago
I lived in Minneapolis 20+ years ago and remember that liquor store. So sad. Glad I got the hell out of that hell hole. You could see the writing on the wall. Cities will only continue to degenerate absent massive efforts to combat the effects, which we are not up for as a society.

@akkamara
7 hours ago
As a dude that lives in the area and everyday works in both Minneapolis and Saint Paul. It’s even more devastating then those video show. They’ve closed down almost every Walgreens and Target in Minneapolis proper in Saint Paul proper.
4

@MechaBuu
5 hours ago
These side-by-side comparisons gives of Fallout map vibes. From bright, colorful buildings to what’s left of it after the atomic bomb hit.
3

@merkinert3773
9 hours ago
Amazing Atheist literally made a video in 2020 called, “I Love Riots” supporting the looting of a Target. Now he’s made videos complaining about food deserts.
165

23 replies

@typingcat
8 hours ago
In the 1990’s, the Korean news media called it “LA black people riot (LA heukin pokdong; 黒人暴動)”. I haven’t watched Korean television over a decade, but last year I happened to hear some Korean TV show on a supermarket. A young Korean celebrity (probably) was lecturing other guests how it is racist to call it heukin pokdong (black people riot) and black people were the victims of the society. I don’t know what the Korean media call it now, but in my mind, I will always remember it as heukin pokdong.
11

1 reply

@anthonyscozzari761
6 hours ago
I grew up in Minneapolis, and my parents still live there. I am so glad I didn’t live there when this happened.
1

@jaundiceelcompa6806
1 hour ago
What sucks is that we can’t do anything about it

@hatednyc
8 hours ago (edited)
9:26 This absolute GENIUS actually asked why NOT looting a local business in your own community is a GOOD THING. I just can’t anymore. We are done. It’s over.
5

@binjbinj8018
2 hours ago
This is the reason why everyone who is Non-Black American moved away from them or does not want to have anything to do with this troubling community! And at the end of the day they keep on follow us or destroyed our neighborhood that people worked so hard to build!
2

@justkeating8399
9 hours ago
I’ll never forget the “mostly peaceful” line from the reporter while there is a building burning down in the background
156

5 replies

@jilliancrawford7577
8 hours ago
3:32 Does this imply that they thought the Korean business owners weren’t part of the community just because they were different? The way the unidentified woman worded it makes it seem like she doesn’t believe anyone could be a part of her community if they aren’t black.
12

3 replies

@savagesweetheart7476
7 hours ago
So sad that communities are still suffering from this
Burn, Loot, Murder
2

@Trollificusv2
5 hours ago
4:48 “They attitude not right. They just don’t have any respect for the community that steals from them day and night.,”
~Translated
2

@mitc0185
8 hours ago
I live in South Minneapolis, equidistant from 3rd precinct and 38th and Chicago. There are signs of hope… but it has taken time to get here. What happened 3 years ago was an unprecedented failure of government for this city and state. I have not lost hope that this area will prevail as a lovely place to live.
2

1 reply

@angeloacosta9411
2 minutes ago
truly sad ! I’m glad this did not happen in Des Moines, Ia.

@mirror2760
9 hours ago (edited)
Imagine rioting and destroying a city while fighting for justice.
We want justice so we’re gonna destroy stores, livelihoods and create even more victims. Yes, this is totally moral and effect.
107

8 replies

@midsizetexas970
7 hours ago
History seems to repeat itself for those who refuse to learn.
1

@microcolonel
7 hours ago
The criminal mindset and culture makes communities poor… The people who were following the rules and working hard suffer the most.
3

@psyxypher3881
1 hour ago
I can see myself in the future telling the younger generation “No, there was no justice behind these riots.”.

@psymi-hk1fp
7 hours ago
years ago, I thought Minneapolis sounded nice place and wanted to visit….. let’s just say I’ve had a change of opinion
5

@terrybeasley5931
2 hours ago (edited)
I was born in Minneapolis and have realitives who still lived there untill about 5 years ago. They have all moved away. Family had lived there for almost a century. I am so sad. I have good memories from my childhood.

@Reyokultsia
6 hours ago
I say all the time as a black man, I have been saying “I just want to see my people stop fucking up” at this point. I can’t call those who cause destruction for no reason, my people. This has been 3 years of idiocy and I want no part of it
25

3 replies

@polisci-dam8828
7 hours ago
I was activated by the Minnesota National Guard for the Floyd riots and the Wright riots the next summer, Minnesota is a mess now.
3

@soniccd9983
8 hours ago
8:19 this is the perfect way to showcase how bad it got in such a short time look at the tree it didnt grow much between those 2 shots yet the second looks like its been abandoned for years.
4

@outofcompliance1639
2 hours ago (edited)
I was on site of the LA riots 2 weeks later (and the day before) and the bleeps there were pretty happy because they thought there would be money given to them to “build back better”. Didn’t happen of course. They did change the name from South Central LA to just South LA… didn’t help either.
1

@streaky81
7 hours ago (edited)
What that sort of behaviour says to people thinking about investing is “don’t invest there, don’t start a business there, don’t live there” – none of which is good for the people who are stuck in the area, who are always going to be the poorest. The businesses might recover, but they’ll do it somewhere else. Now what?
4

@trishrandall5031
2 hours ago
The word hubris isn’t strong enough to describe people who think their “community” deserves to destroy other people’s decades of hard work, just because the members of that “community” don’t own anything.
2

1 reply

@rlm9825
7 hours ago
I live in a red state and city and we don’t allow this BS. You get what you vote for.
25

2 replies

@fried2styles
6 hours ago
If a community destroys their OWN food sources, seems like the problem will solve itself after a few missed meals. LOL
5

@mikeactual7640
7 hours ago
Nobody feels bad for em. They did it to themselves and are teaching their youth to do the same. Beautiful culture.
4

@TanukiDigital
5 hours ago
I’m never going to forget the summer of 2020.
1

@dug3569
7 hours ago
I’m sure they taught those Koreans to respect the black
Community/ they can now tell everyone what respect they deserve
8

@DogWalkerBill
1 hour ago (edited)
I remember a special, on maybe NPR, discussing the 1965 Watts CA riots. Up til then, some companies had been doing the ‘responsible thing’ and investing in the area. That all stopped with the riots and 40 years later the community had not recovered. It’s 58 years later and they still haven’t recovered.

@paullambert8701
8 hours ago
I want to be fair and acknowledge that there are plenty of decent black folk who would never take part in such vile behaviour. However, there are many who do and who claim some kind of victimhood as as an excuse. They complain that they were brought to America in chains and against their will. They can leave the same way.
36

12 replies

@LeavesOAutumn
7 hours ago
I remember the “broken windows theory.”
3

@mightyporkinplowastranger8705
7 hours ago
“How does it help you to NOT loot Target?”
Well I mean first, do you have 20 minutes?
8

@capoman1
3 hours ago
I love how they act like insurance “fixes the issue” if there is looting or destruction. As if it doesn’t harm the community or the feeling of safety or the economy when shoppers face mass looting going on in shops or when the town is burning.
1

@gkelley77
7 hours ago
Such a beautiful culture. They really take care of their neighborhoods…
3

@toddbraddock236
2 hours ago
I just so happened to be working doing security at Thrivent Financial during the riots…..weekend security that is. It was crazy, I remember driving in to work and seeing places burning. It was crazy, and it has never been the same. A lot of this was due to 2 things, 1 the pandemic, 2 the riots. Once it burned down, there was no reason to bring it back. Some businesses did rebuild, and many did not. I do not work in security anymore, and I have not been downtown since…..no reason to ride the light rail, pay the high price of parking, or see the madness that Thrives on downtown!!!!

@ianmcgeehan4627
9 hours ago
Stereotyping is merely observing a behavior in a segment of society and because that behavior reliably occurs in nearly all of that segment it can be reliably applied to any individual of that societal segment with near perfect accuracy despite there being a few exceptions.
62

5 replies

@marcodarko6941
7 hours ago (edited)
A couple of years back I was standing in a line in a courthouse (personal property tax line) next to somebody I suspect that may have been a stalker, keeping tabs on me perhaps.. that individual told me a couple of things they knew firsthand about the “peaceful” protest that had happened up there in Minneapolis.. and something also about that unfortunate incident where that criminal with the funny money swallowed his drug stash and passed away.
After I left that courthouse I noticed a particular vehicle of another individual lingering around me for a few miles showing up at a gas station I stopped at.. I have the proof with pictures.. an individual that had already created some issues with some of family members a couple of years prior to that.
1

@jadenova
8 hours ago
Since you don’t own anything then you destroy that stuff and the person who does own it decides not to rebuild it.
3

@Godeias
5 hours ago
Worked security in the Denny’s building, and knew the owners of the liquor store you showed, they were across the street from each other, the police station was a block away.
1

@joespinella7773
8 hours ago
I live 30 minutes directly south of Minneapolis in Lakeville. You could see the fires from there. Everyone in town who had a gun was at the ready should the riots spread to the suburbs
3

@davidcarter7880
3 minutes ago
Every time I hear about the rooftop Koreans, I feel so proud to be American. Those men and women were paragons.

@MichaelMiller-xj1ti
9 hours ago
Progressivism is progressing our society off of a cliff.
78

6 replies

@dM-if9lj
6 hours ago
What a beautiful city. I hope they keep it up and continue this vision!

@macygray5984
5 hours ago
Most cities never recover or take a while to. For instance, DC didn’t fully recover from the 1960s riots until recently when they flipped H st, and yes it’s sad that so-called gentrification happened, but I’m happy to see thriving businesses vs ran-down storefronts with the horrid smell that they possess.
1

@deepconcealmentholsters783
8 hours ago
This is sad but it’s typical of these communities. I’m not sure if it’s because they are given everything that they don’t appreciate anything or a culture thing.but when I moved to South Florida, it was a brand new community built a few years before I got there within 15 years the place is condemned and torn down, but they rebuilt it again brand new modern state of the art. So maybe it’s a money laundering system.
2

@JayZonQt
18 minutes ago
the gas station that says
“where there is people there is power”
the actual saying I believe is
“where there is PAIN there is PROFIT”
1

@gyromurphy
8 hours ago (edited)
Here in Pittsburgh, Target regional management told the city planners that if police didnt stop people from looting, they were straight up going to pull the store from the area. Back in 2020, protests and mini riots were predominantly staged outside the East Liberty neighborhood’s Target on Penn Avenue. Where what used to be a horrible crime riddled project, now stands a Target. It really did bring life to the area. So the mayor told the police chief to make sure nothing happened to the Target….and nothing did because of the heavy police response. Grantes we only had a few riots here and there, it still wouldve been far worse if they just let it happen. To date the neighborhood is …ok, its still not great, but its far better off than pretty much every other neighborhood the George Kirby riots consumed
53

2 replies

@jayvan4353
8 hours ago
There are still empty lots in LA to this day from the 92 riots
4

@anabelgonzalez8984
8 hours ago
It’s sad. I think a lot of these businesses are trying to bring life and economy to their community. They can make a difference too.
3

1 reply

@Electronzap
18 minutes ago
Minnesotan here, grocery stores and large retailers are currently leaving Minneapolis due to theft and violence.
1

@alonsojorquera4199
6 hours ago
LOL they replaced the “Speedway” name with “Peoplesway”, absolute comedic gold.
6

@allengrantham6693
44 minutes ago
In Minneapolis the bodies of two people were found when the wreckage of the buildings was cleared. That was in the Minneapolis Tribune if I recall correctly.

@AusDenBergen
9 hours ago
The media need to be held accountable for all the blood they have on their hands. Severely. Physically.
164

15 replies

@B.B.-gu1zk
6 hours ago
I lived in this area of Minneapolis as a young adult struggling to find my footing. This area is very diverse, full of hardworking immigrants and children of immigrants. People from Africa, Asia, Mexico, and Eastern Europe to name just a few. Sure, many of the rioters were from the area, but just as many if not more came from elsewhere. I wonder if they would do the same thing to their own cities? Most likely seeing as they’re all so stupid.
P.S. Minneapolis is still a beautiful city.
2

@khiemduong379
8 hours ago
I drove through Minneapolis (where the riots were) but it looks like everything was rebuilt (apartments and condos replaced most of the building that were destroyed) but I don’t know if people are actually living in those buildings. I think those riots opened a gateway for gentrification where really wealthy companies bought those businesses and land lots. I try to not drive down there so besides what I saw- not sure how well those communities are doing.
3

3 replies

@johnsmyth8445
5 hours ago (edited)
Anyone else notice even the bus shelter is boarded up
2

@floodx4947
7 hours ago
Congrats to St. George on his nearly 3 years sober.
3

@gatchywatchyentertainmentb2090
3 hours ago
You know I almost feel bad for them…
no I don’t…

@judahofjudea4601
9 hours ago
Have you ever discussed the meeting Obama had with BLM members in 2016?
34

2 replies

@ccarmean1968
7 hours ago
Work from home becoming a permanent feature of the workplace is going to change all city centers. I used to work downtown every day, since 2020 I work from a surround exurb.
The money from business activity and rents has left and moved elsewhere.
2

@shlomogoldstein3373
4 hours ago
I cant express how happy i am that this happened. Couldnt have happened to a better, more tolerant group of people.
1

@daddydubs4349
5 hours ago
I went through Minneapolis recently. That Speedway is actually just across from George Floyd square. Most of the businesses on Chicago Ave are gone, I think Cup Foods is the only thing left and it’s super graffitied up. Most of the businesses in the Powderhorn neighborhood are boarded up, some are burned out, it’s not a good look. I’m sure that in another 10 years it won’t have improved much.
2

@cargopilotguy305
1 hour ago
It’s not all of us. Some of us just want to live in peace.

@meepmoopmeep1
5 hours ago (edited)
“The social contract is BRUCKEN” Lol 14:23
2

@samandmikikhardian1117
8 hours ago
“Stop caring about property over people. They were insured!”
I kept hearing that and it always enraged me. That property is how these PEOPLE made their money! They dont give a shit about the people. Get out of Murderapolis. Its a total loss and cesspool.
28

6 replies

@raimeyewens7518
1 hour ago
I saw a video recently of a Walmart being destroyed. One lady was upset. The lady next to her said—We will make our own Walmart. I thought how are a bunch of people with no jobs that go around looting everything going to build a Walmart? Who will fund that? Would they actually get a job there? They would just steal from it like they do everything else. It was one of the craziest things I’ve ever heard. And she actually believed the words coming out of her own mouth how slow minded some people are.
1

Actual Justice Warrior
·
1 reply

@uppercutgrandma4425
4 hours ago
So many local landmarks (businesses/restaurants/old bars) got demolished that some areas are now like a giant dying mall but, it’s neighborhoods.

@angiebervinkle1575
1 hour ago
They want to act like animals u get to live like one do these ppl know that we have zero sympathy for them
2

@petra9089
7 hours ago
I live in St. Paul. I remember we had a curfew because of it. About a month later after the riots, I went out to the areas that were hit and snapped some pictures.
1

1 reply

@N0stalgicLeaf
3 hours ago
“If you start to transfer the ownership of the community to the community, everybody will prosper.” That’s a cute sentiment, but that’s not what happened. Not even remotely. Nothing changed hands. Property and lives were destroyed. The community was devastated and we’re all worse off for it.
1

@antonchigurh3794
9 hours ago
I remember going out to stock up on groceries the day before the 92 L.A. riots. I knew exactly what was going to happen. It’s only gotten worse.
31

3 replies

@muaddib7685
2 hours ago (edited)
I was in Minneapolis 3 weeks ago. I stayed in the center of downtown.
Police sit in cars on EVERY block to prevent tourists and conference goers from getting attacked.
You cant leave the hotel after dark, homeless drug addicts wonder in to the lobby and they need a bouncer standing in lobby all the time.
Apartment buildings constructed 6 years ago are becoming empty and they are leaving.
It is dying for sure

@markfinkbeiner3034
52 minutes ago
Excellent analysis. Thank you.

@marm842
3 hours ago
Well if they dont get tought history. They are doomed to repeat it!!
1

@cindichean
2 hours ago
Live in Minnesota. Haven’t been to Mpls since 2020.
I remember these places…it’s sad that they were destroyed.

@merrythoughts1306
4 hours ago
Spot on! As always
1

@garbagemanbear406
8 hours ago
Similar situation is happening in Portland Oregon post 2020 BLM riots.
25

@Blakmagic88
6 hours ago
Yeah, I’m far from a wealthy black person but I’m starting realize that many of the people who think like this just don’t understand how the world works and refuse to learn.
5

2 replies

@trainnerd3029
3 hours ago
Congratulations to George Floyd on three years of sobriety!!

@treetoptia-2903
5 hours ago
My heart is broken
1

@charliedango2664
7 hours ago
“The person who fixes the situation is killing us”
She has no idea how profound and true that statement really is because she’s taking about the white man instead of the black man.
11

@jrjr3412
4 hours ago
One reason for all this insanity: NO FATHERS IN THE HOUSE.
2

1 reply

@keiichi8191
8 hours ago (edited)
They were just “fiery but mostly peaceful protests,” guys.
Meanwhile grandma who walked through the open doors of the Capitol and snapped some pics of the statues get 15 years for “insurrection”.
46

1 reply

@anitaeric2
1 hour ago
My wife and I left the city after 30+ years of living there. It’s sad to see this once really nice city turn to garbage and become unsafe.

@kurtk8926
2 hours ago
Amen! I am glad of it. They voted for it. They got it.

@Superduper666
3 hours ago
Whenever rioting starts, Marshall Law should be instituted and people gotten rid of who are destroying stuff and hurting others.
1

@Vax505
5 hours ago
“we don’t own anything” what she’s saying is “she doesn’t own anything”. There were a lot of black owned businesses that were destroyed in the riots.
2

@gregrcr3
2 hours ago
excellent video and commentary.. well done…

@SuperiorFanBase
9 hours ago (edited)
They think that we have magic dirt, and that is why our businesses prosper. They think that if they have our magic dirt, that they will prosper without effort.
53

5 replies

@Macleod1991
1 hour ago
Also people need to protect their communities. Arm up, ignore the corrupted DAs, fight like hell.
1

@jchavez612
7 hours ago
It’s crazy how old those photos are. You definitely haven’t been to Minneapolis in sometime or ever. Man I love the internet.
1

@docholliday5491
1 hour ago
I learned true hatred and malice in the last few years. It will explode on these people soon enough.
1

@warpswede
4 hours ago
I wonder if they ever found out the identity of the burned body in the pawn shop that was torched to the ground.

@jimschaffroth5652
1 hour ago
Violence and destruction is all these people know.

@cloudlessbluesky1748
8 hours ago
It’s better for them not to recover. A monument serves not only to celebrate auspicious occasion but also as a reminder of stupidity.
25

2 replies

@Jaxvidstar
4 hours ago (edited)
8:00 it is a restuarant/bakery chain but had closed a few Florida locations near me unfortunately. It has these big muffins called Mammoth Muffins and a close family friend liked them. 8:58 Or a power that destroyed businesses.

@lrnasigo1
1 hour ago
I lived through the LA Riots and my store in South Gate never reopened. Moved to Texas soon after.

@hungphat1553
3 hours ago
Need that video on lances timcast appearance Sean!

@robertmattox9715
2 hours ago
Makes sense they do this to em selfs but yet want to blame something that has nothing to do w it .

@jaspermartin7444
9 hours ago
Interesting thank you. So instead of working to better themselves, they want “other people’s money given to them”. Unlike literally any other ethnicity who understands we have to work for our success.
57

7 replies

@dontforgettolike7127
7 hours ago (edited)
When I was a kid about 15 (roughly 18 years ago), I was left alone in Compton by greyhound bus. The entire area looked like the building to the right (7:00), and all the sidewalks were covered in tents. Not knowing any better, I hung out with a homeless guy and paid for his beer. I was robbed of my $20 pay-as-you-go phone. Looking back, the area was like a hub for the homeless. Like it was their area, no business open besides a few liquor shops. The one thing I wondered was why they didn’t just break into these abandoned buildings and live in them instead.

@dennismcavoy8388
8 hours ago
Well there’s at least one good reason not to loot and burn a community is your gonna eventually meet resistance and possibly be removed permantly from existence. This individual is another self professed victim and it’s someone else’s fault for her disappointment in not being as successful in life as some others. Always easier to blame others. Truth can hurt sometimes.
1

@dominysynclair
41 minutes ago
I lived in South Central in 1996, it looked like the riots ended 2 days before I got there.

@SurvivalistMedia
4 hours ago
They didn’t need a liquor store but RIP Popeye’s you will be missed.

@siggyretburns7523
2 hours ago (edited)
7:25 notice how the building owners taxes didnt protect his building, but the city found enough funding to paint the crosswalk.

@unpopularopinion9831
8 hours ago
Why couldn’t the business owners sue the BLM chapters?
19

4 replies

@JodyBruchon
7 hours ago
I went to White Bear Lake in 2021 to buy a car. I was very happy to go around the core of the city and happy to drive away, 1,200 miles back home, despite my window exploding on the way.
1

@ampeater777
6 hours ago
“If you start to transfer the ownership of the community to the community, everybody will prosper” Uh excuse me, what? Were all those Korean victims not part of the community? Though with the direction race grifters have steered the opinions of their intended audience, I wouldn’t be surprised if the victims were in fact NOT viewed as part of the community
4

4 replies

@freedomhalfoff9771
8 hours ago
There’s no doubt if mobs we’re marching down Rodeo Drive burning out the merchants or further out and burning down the mansions Hollywood would be singing a different tune
2

@schneir5
51 minutes ago
“I’m sorry I had a fight in the middle of your black panther party.” – Forrest Gump

@swadams2
5 hours ago
I’m surprised there was anybody who didn’t foresee this outcome. Nobody wants to open up a business where it’s likely to get looted and/or destroyed. And even if somebody does open a business there, they have higher security costs which makes it that much harder to make a profit.

@michaelfreeman1726
5 hours ago
How about “reparations” for this inexcusable destruction? From the perpetrators, of course.
2

@cakesaregood5176
8 hours ago
I would like to congratulate George on nearly 3 years of sobriety.
54

1 reply

@Alex-vq8tg
6 hours ago
13:37 when someone starts speaking with “I’ve been seein a lot of thangs”, you know you’re in for an education in how to masterfully wield the English language.
1

@stefanlaskowski6660
6 hours ago
My brother lives in Minneapolis. He said it’s a shit show, but he can’t afford to move as he’s disabled.

@MrChase115
5 hours ago
Note to self: DO NOT RENT PROPERTY ABOVE STORES IN LARGE CITIES! EVER ! You never know…
1

@mr.marvelousmess6986
7 hours ago
If I spent my whole life blaming other people and taking a big dump on my neighbors lawn I accept that I will be a loser in life. But I take care of myself and look out for my neighbor so I don’t have that problem.

@titaniumgreen5367
2 hours ago
Some folk are not as important as the media makes them out to be..if they are suffering from their own actions so be it

@jazzerthecatsucks
8 hours ago (edited)
I drove through that area of L.A., a couple months after the riots. What I saw, were street corners with Korean’s, Asian’s and Mexican’s selling fruits / goods and blacks leaning up against buildings. This is a cultural issue and we can’t talk about it.
12

1 reply

@yaboimax6356
1 hour ago
Humanities’ stupidity will never cease to amaze me. How can so many people not comprehend CAUSE AND EFFECT?

@matthewmcinnis4565
50 minutes ago
Minneapolis isn’t destroyed. It’s diversified!

@pat11gpd
2 hours ago
“How does it help you to not loot Target?”
-Galaxy Brain

@TheMoneyMakingMentor
1 hour ago
Business owners need to go after the people that were in charge of this city and sue the pants off them.

@MrJoker2112
1 hour ago
Those people only dug our own grave!

@julians7785
8 hours ago
“Their attitude is wrong”
The utter lack of awareness….
19

1 reply

@MikeInOregon
54 minutes ago
At least Officer Fentanyl was held accountable for Saint Floyd’s overdose death.

@deadnamedex3180
6 hours ago
The Graffiti and murals are plastered over the damage like giftRAP and it’s hilarious
1

@stratblacknosugar.5125
1 hour ago
So a community can come together to destroy but not to build.

@coltfathwell6185
2 hours ago
Shawn has never had a piece of pie from Perkins man! Now that’s a crime against humanity lol

@JK-ex7zr
1 hour ago
Yeah and when these areas become “food deserts,” we’ll never hear the end of it.

@morbidplatypus
8 hours ago
Anyone worth their weight in salt might as well relocate to better communities. It’s a business death sentence to stay in these places. I don’t feel bad for any residents there. They did it to themselves and will suffer for it. Sadly, they will never take accountability and will always behave the same way, same victim mentality, same ignorance driven aggressive behaviors.
18

1 reply

@LordLoMR2
5 hours ago (edited)
I lived in Minnesota during the riots and moved out during the riots. It got so bad, people had to hire armed guards. And the most ridiculous thing was most of the small business burned down/looted were black owned.
Got to the point where black business owners had to put signs out saying the property is black owned.

@KickYouInTheThroat
7 hours ago
Just once i wanna trick an angry mob into destroying a FAKE Rock Ridge instead of the REAL Rock Ridge like in Blazing Saddles.
1

@xvonpocalypse3435
9 minutes ago
Couldn’t happen to more deserving people

@AM-dd4zb
4 hours ago
Lance was on Tim Pool last night. Sean, do your magic.

@missmandy2049
4 hours ago
NO ACCOUNTABILITY IS THE STANDARD!

@honestthoughts2622
9 hours ago (edited)
We know the ones who are doing all of this. Until we stop them, they will not stop.
23

3 replies

@nebula0024
8 hours ago (edited)
Thank you for bringing this blatant and unproductive destruction to light. Sure glad all these buildings getting destroyed solved racism.
Also to Trevor Noah: tu quoque logical fallacy – You avoided having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser – you answered criticism with criticism. You could also argue his claim is a Redding Herring logical fallacy as well.
14

1 reply

@golddragon6995
3 hours ago
I’ll be honest I wasn’t expecting them to destroy the Popeyes

@vv183
11 minutes ago
Constant civil unrest= no rest for the wicked

@r00tb0und
1 hour ago
i love in mpls… whole thing is like a play that nobody knows they are preforming in.

@Chordus_Gaius
3 hours ago
F for Minneapolis

@lonedogism
9 hours ago
There is something seriously wrong with Trevor Noah.
19

1 reply

@redneckroy8947
6 hours ago
CONGRATULATIONS TO GEORGE FLOYD ON NEARLY 3 UEARS OF SOBRIETY

@redrocket1193
4 hours ago
George Floyd sober for almost 3 years now. Congratulations.
2

1 reply

@leonardoserna2238
3 hours ago
Makin excuses to destroy nice performance.
1

@weslar7
1 hour ago
Part of having a successful business that is based on actually providing value to a community is NOT being a lazy POS

@colemurphy5124
5 hours ago
7:00 “Hey guys, let’s paint the street so maybe people won’t notice the vandalized building ”

@moosechuckle4144
9 hours ago
George Floyd, 3 years sober!?!
Congratulations to him man, congratulations.
137

22 replies

@TheNeonpeon
7 hours ago
I’m in 100% agreement with you. The Popeye’s spicy chicken sandwich is far superior to Chik-fil-A. It’s the number 1 chicken sandwich ever made, imo.
2

@nathanporrata9274
7 hours ago
Popeyes might have a better sandwich but they literally never get my order right and CFA literally never gets it wrong
1

@yvetteowens6924
35 minutes ago
You have to give respect to be respected

@justinemcpherson
8 hours ago (edited)
7:30 ‘W’ take from Sean on the Popeye’s spicy chicken sandwich. It’s the best one on the market, of any fast food place (saying that as someone who has loved chick-fil-a since I moved to the States).

@LarsonChristopher
5 hours ago
A lot of good people have moved out of the Twin Cities.

@Kirigakurejones
7 hours ago
Born and raised in “the community”. I left it behind long ago and unfortunately what you say is true. Those neighborhoods will never recover, and me and my house will keep a very wide distance from the same.
9

@guitarslinger2717
6 hours ago
I can’t remember which sci-fi movies it was, Maze Runner, Divergent, something like that, where everyone was in the cities and they were walled off from the outside to keep them safe. I’m thinking it will be the opposite in this country. Keep the cities walled in to keep the suburbs safe.

@john-juanlocke2124
3 hours ago
Guys this is why you need the 2nd amendment and community to help each other out

@varinderbains65
2 hours ago
The truth!

@robertcope9494
8 hours ago
Business owners take several things into consideration before opening a store. One is safety of/for the business. Insurance is very high in an unsafe location. Being uninsured in a previously violent location is fool hardy and a very bad business decision.
2

@rihardssv2647
1 hour ago
I would say it was an attack on small business to give a big companies take over in cover.

@watcher1269
9 hours ago
I’m pretty sure the people who destroyed these areas of Minneapolis were NOT all from the community.
34

2 replies

@martinjohnston4320
8 hours ago
Almost 3 years sober good job

@treybeaman1444
6 hours ago
I expect a future video on Timcast hosting the Serfs last night. He tried using Metadata to support his ridiculous claims on transing kids. Sean would have been a strong counter guest to have on.

@George-xu1ob
5 hours ago
What was learned from the 60s riots.keep it in the playbook use when needed

@danielbyrne5402
8 hours ago
Man, trevor noah has some things to answer right there

@benfridge7570
1 hour ago
Nothing says “we showed the yt man” like burning down your own community” lol then they blame y.t. for it being burnt down

@itchykami
8 hours ago
I’m not sure how that one woman thinks black people not spending money is a threat.
7

@dburleson5
6 hours ago
Definitely need to talk about SerfTV being on Timcast

@sasquatch6829
7 hours ago
Also there is a bud line that runs from Chicago to those cities…. Cutting that off would help
1

@briangibbons113
4 hours ago
They want thier own shit but want someone eles to pay for it ! Thats not how shit works!

@p.d.l7023
8 hours ago
The people who brought diapers to the riot = did they put their heads up on stakes?

@ctpierce181
50 minutes ago
Thanks for all your help while most sleep.

@hobsdigree2
6 hours ago
My God, do I ever hate Trever Noah. He lives in his ivory tower while encouraging violence in our backyards.
85

8 replies

@rationalbacon5872
8 hours ago
Everywhere they go, across the whole world, the same results. Watch the buildings magically return to rubble. Never do those bricks become buildings.
1

@vasnellen9158
7 hours ago
For sure. We love to go to the North Shore, if we ever go again, we will travel through Wisconsin and once again stay away from the Twin Cities.
1

@mikaelafox6106
6 hours ago
Ah, yes, the summer of love.

@greyfoxice
7 hours ago
I’m from South Minneapolis. I live about 1 mile from where G. Fl0yd’s died. We call Minneapolis Murderapolis now. My family moved in late 2020 and the police station is still burned and decayed. Its standing on purpose as a symbol of anti-police rhetoric. Minneapolis’s police force is down 50% and crime is surging to the point where carjacking’s are expected on a daily bases. Before the riots I never hear a peep about carjacking’s.
1

@milesh3651
6 hours ago
I just want to remind everyone this marks 3 years my boy George Floyd has been drug free! Pulling for you homeboy.

@messychavez6264
9 hours ago
Can confirm still burned out buildings and the crime in the area is worse than it already was
12

@therealfriday13th
8 hours ago
…He seriously asked “how does it help to not loot Target?”…
My god Trevor, i can think of two fucking ways right off the to of my head: it keeps the business in the area providing both jobs and goods, and it doesn’t make you look bad. Fucking hell man…
3

@minimatemasterworks
8 hours ago
I live an hour and half north of Minneapolis. I’m not going to pretend I spent a lot of money there, but twice a year id go there to bike their bike trails, eat at their restaurants, and buy a few things and random neat stores you dont have anywhere else in Minnesota. I haven’t been back since the riots. I have two young children that would add to that spending. I wont say never again, but at least not until they get their $hlt together.

@ickster23
3 hours ago
From my perspective, thus is the urban demographic getting what they voted for.
1

@ares190
4 hours ago
Does anyone have any reading reccomendations on crime creates poverty and not the other way around? Id like to educate myself more on this and looking for a solid place to start.

@malleycat24
2 hours ago
I remember when that boy was thrown off the escalator at Mall of America

@clarkr1065
7 hours ago
Who knew listening to people telling you to destroy your neighborhood would lead to a destroyed neighborhood.
5

@mpowe123
7 hours ago
Perkins – I used to call that the fancy Denny’s on road trips with my family. Went once in 1990. Dont remember much except the brand colors look the same as today, and they served pie in the morning.

@klake3580
8 hours ago
She came up with the solution to the problem… only shop at locally owned businesses!? But you didn’t just destroy the idea of the business but the actual physical building that is nearly irreplaceable.

@scottcolegrove5308
3 hours ago
Lets Hope!

@reneeh1783
6 hours ago
Wouldn’t that be considered race riots because they deliberately focused the destruction in the Korean area?
1

@adamhero459
4 hours ago
“The authority that comes in to fix the situation. But the person who fixes the situation kills us….”
Then stop stealing and destroying things…… it’s people like this that are “destroying the social contract”. And then they complain about it.

@belindakennedy5828
7 hours ago
Give a white man a brick he will build,give a black man a brick he will destroy a window.
31

4 replies

@brandonfrawley5151
7 hours ago
Those people saying how beautiful these places are going to be are hilarious yeah looks great
1

@DogWalkerBill
1 hour ago
There are Perkins in Staten Island NY. It is a chain of home-style family restaurants. Nice food, affordable prices.

@Chaosga
9 minutes ago
They do it to themselves.

@jdavis6650
1 hour ago
When I’m looking for an inciteful opinion and my choices are Trevor or my 2 year old, the kid wins every time. Especially when he’s been fed.

@SafeNEffective
56 minutes ago
We live in upside-down world

@immaleaf4964
9 hours ago
Rodney King did a lot of bad things
21

1 reply

@corinneaggar9755
7 hours ago
I think the media should have taken some of the blame for fuelling the fames of these riots and should be held accountable
1

1 reply

@JosephKulisics
2 hours ago
Perkins is an upper midwestern chain of diners kind of like Denny’s but a little better. They have them all over Wisconsin.

@theoneandonlyguyallikian1190
4 hours ago
Don’t worry.
I’m sure it will still be considered everyone else’s fault

@SuperDagod1
10 minutes ago
I would never have my family in these areas. I hear the birds chirping each day and it’s lovely . When five cities at once are on fire and the police step away I’m
Gonna watch all the excitement from my safe small town hot tub
Exciting

@rleeboston33
3 hours ago
And they’ll do it again. Ridiculous behavior.

@dr.poopoohead5871
8 hours ago
They’ll keep doing it, so long as they can get away with it.
11

@Hammerhead547
6 hours ago
Perkins is basically Denny’s with a specialty in fresh baked pies.

@christopleefulp5256
7 hours ago
If she went to work for a decade and was careful with her money she could get a loan and start owning property in the community. That’s how our grandparents did it.

@errolbarnes9729
2 hours ago
F—ing Amen….slow clap, thank you so so much for saying the quiet part out loud, I can’t add anymore to what you just said…. because I’ve been saying it for years as a black conservative, and you want to know why….not just white folks but every other persons of color and even newly arrived immagrants don’t want us in their community, let’s just be real and truthful about it, because the women in the video told the truth, “if it ain’t our we’ll destroy it” . So what Scott Adams said was correct….and the heavy set woman said it. I don’t think there’s many of us who agree with her feelings on the matter, I know I don’t, there are great black people like myself who want to live and thrive in a diverse community. But again thanks for saying the truth.

@xlerb2286
7 hours ago
There was a long time local bookstore in the area, was burned to the ground. In no way were they part of any problem and had been a stable employer for years. Years later and due to crowdfunding from their loyal customers they’re back in business. But not in that community. It’s a smaller store, and they employ fewer people. That was a loss bigger than their apparent financial loss. With the former location now being a vacant lot nothing else there is going to employ folk.

@malkmuslistener5459
5 hours ago
slam poetry doesn’t make a convincing argument for riot lady
2

@cernstormrunner7263
8 hours ago
I’ll never forget my friend telling me the riots and destruction was ok because ” they have insurance.”
6

1 reply

@GamerModz123
4 hours ago (edited)
At a certain point the “its not all of them” argument starts to lose weight. We’ve been dealing with civil unrest as a result of race and ethnicity since the beginning of the country. There is literally 1 group of people that never seem to learn or improve, in fact they seem to get worse with time. How many times are we as a society going to allow these people to hold our nation back, often destroying entire cities economically, before we say it’s enough.
1

1 reply

@chrissavage1534
2 hours ago
On a positive note, George Floyd has been clean and sober for almost three years now.

@lorenzell3104
5 hours ago
Milwaukee had riots in the late 68s. The area never recovered.

@someoneelse1904
6 hours ago
Interesting that the black people in the area don’t see the Koreans living in the area as part of the community.
2

@bolatluver29
5 hours ago
I don’t give AF about these cities who sat back and watched this happen

@MarvinHartmann452
8 hours ago
Congrats to George for 3 years of sobriety.
9

@frankfritz7625
5 hours ago
Hey AJW, Just for the record I enjoy your content however if you do not under stand that aspect of the L.A. Riots you need to know about the Killing of Latasha HARLIN. That is where the riff between the 2 communities began and the fact that “MEDIA” failed to cover this story and the influence on the community is perplexing. Keep making content and I will keep watching it.

@luvr381
3 hours ago
What a culture.

@nightowl2486
5 hours ago
All by design… some are all too willing to be controlled

@omniscience9631
25 minutes ago
I would love to see those animals try something like that in Texas.

@Enoch115
18 minutes ago
Ohhhh yeah, I remember those ‘peaceful,’ riots.

@cbixby8335
7 hours ago
I feel bad for the innocent people caught in the middle, cant affors to leave these “warzones”
4

@deflamrek
6 hours ago
The biggest takeaway from this video is that Sean doesn’t know about Perkins

@etrigan911
8 hours ago
Detroit is just now recovering it may never be what it was though as most of the people have moved out of the city

@ukaszlis1838
4 hours ago (edited)
Im from Poland and Im shocked what is going on in your third world country. If you will need some aid, I mean : food, clothes, medicine just ask. We will send some humanitarian help. Cheers from straight, white, christian european country
3

@michaellombardi5831
7 hours ago
I live in philly. Hate to say it but any neighborhood that’s completely minorities, you can tell immediately by how it looks as soon as you enter. I traveled a lot in the USA, it’s super obvious when you drive into most all black neighborhoods. No other group destroys their own community.
2

@samwithers8477
4 hours ago
This is what they do.
1

@gyromurphy
8 hours ago
“The Ghost of White Supremacy Past”
Never change, Mr Fitzgerald, never change.
8

@christophercrowley5994
8 hours ago
I love it!

@buddyguy4723
5 hours ago
I think even a three-year-old can understand that you can’t break a lego house into a bigger better one.

@brendasmith3244
5 hours ago
Yeah the businesses got their insurance money and fled to a place with law and order.

@ralphkilloran8065
5 hours ago
It was very educational learning that Miami could recovered quickly and fully after a hurricane but other American cities do not recover after race riots. I hope your government is also learning from the comparison.

@nobiden3134
6 hours ago
“Dont Shit Where You Eat”
even ANIMALS know that!

@HardcoreFourSix
8 hours ago
Poverty does NOT cause crime (especially not violent crime). Crime causes poverty to a greater extent than the reverse. See how Walmart and Walgreens are closing locations where crime is allowed to run rampant.
9

1 reply

@aliciasavage6801
7 hours ago
Perkins is a semi national company. We had some in Colorado. Its like a denny’s.

@stuartd3881
7 hours ago
What’s ironic is they only destroyed their own homes/ businesses and not what they were protesting against

@jadenova
3 hours ago
For years they worked without pay now they want to be paid without work.

@veeDAH225
3 hours ago (edited)
Please do a video on Lance, from the terfs or whatever, visit on tim pool!!

@mtbakerxt40
4 hours ago
I keep wanting to call it “minionapolis”

@Sherry-qi2ju
9 hours ago
If you ever agreed with a riot then you reap what you sow! No peace, forever riots, because you made an agreement with the devil. The people who are against any riots live in peace.
6

@Notisaidthebat
1 hour ago
I’m curious if any one made it out better. They obviously ruined the chance to shop again but the stole everything they didn’t burn down. So I wonder if any of them took enough to profit, and if they did how far did they get with that profit. Did even last a year?

@tacob69
3 minutes ago
I guess Perkins is a chain restaurant because there is one in Baltimore City that’s been there for 10 years or so and I actually thought it wasn’t because I’ve never seen another till now so I guess it is.

@arydant
5 hours ago
The Perkins was in my old neighborhod. Fortunately we moved to the burbs 10 years ago.

@leeroyjenkins2528
7 hours ago
Perkins is a restaurant chain that tries to do things better than Denny’s

@hydrolito
45 minutes ago
She has money for hair dye, nail polish and clothes and pretends she doesn’t own anything.

@Apple_3.1415
7 hours ago
“Oh No, ThOsE pOoR bUsInEsS oWnErS sarcastic cry ”
-Destructive Rioters
“….Wait… how do we get food and services now….? ironic cry ”
-Also Destructive Rioters
8

@yt_hatescrime_data4301
5 hours ago
Did Trevor really just say… “how does it help u to not loot Target? ” wtf

@corylemons7242
5 hours ago
Popeyes over chick-fla. omg unsubscribed! Lol jk. Perkins is a northern breakfast chain. A lot of them are in Wisconsin but they’re actually starting to close. Great info and analysis as always!

@fecklesstech929
2 hours ago
They’ll complain bitterly that they live in a “food desert”.

@brainstorage4645
6 hours ago
“Why’d you burn down your own community?”
“ITS NOT OURS WE DONT OWN ANYTHING”
You want to own your community, for you to take responsibility for it’s caretaking?
Smoothbrained.

@MK-he1jz
5 hours ago (edited)
Kenosha is the same way. So many long time businesses gone forever. The car source lots have a million worthless cars sitting in them STILL. It’s a mess.

@alterangel
8 hours ago
This does not fill me with hope for our country.
6

1 reply

@korinogaro
7 hours ago (edited)
Not that I condone it but I can only imagine that it would be rather fun to rob Trevor blind and spray paint: “how does not robbing Trevor Noah help us?” on his walls.
3

1 reply

@chalzen1012
5 hours ago
The racism against Asians from certain communities is so well known that Eddie Murphy used to work out into his stand up in the late 80s / early 90s
1

@gogeta667
5 hours ago
Did you see Lance get absolutely roasted last night?

@dead_or_alive2649
41 minutes ago
Perkins is a restaurant chain and yes, I doubt they’d ever even bother considering coming back.

@MaverickhunterXZero
4 hours ago
They voted for this.

@HeartyJoe
9 hours ago
I hear about the NYC subway crime and one of my first thoughts is “Good content for AJW”. Am I a bad person?…
12

2 replies

@Dilbert1999
6 hours ago
Funny how the Tulsa riot is blamed for absolutely all of the poverty the black community faces today, even though they were actually able to rebuild five years later and it didn’t all fall apart until after segregation, and yet these riots are never blamed for any of the poverty the black community faces.
2

@hatednyc
8 hours ago
George Floyd would’ve been fine had they just given him a little milk. He was clearly a healthy, law abiding citizen.

@leewhitaker538
5 hours ago
– Hear, hear!

@rq2944
3 hours ago
Do the politicians in the USA still say that diversity is our strength?
1

@NathanHedglin
6 hours ago
My black friends struggle because they’re called white for working hard, being a father and not going to jail

@pumpkinjoe2827
9 hours ago
Lower “intergenerational wealth” and higher police interactions are both consequences of a higher birthrate. High birthrate means a lower average age meaning more young males who commit more crimes and more kids means wealth gets spread out more from parents and inheritance. This world is dumb
4

@cmdstraker
1 hour ago
“Why not loot Target?” Maybe because you want to keep them around. A month later they start complaining about not having infrastructure

@StarCustom-pk5ff
5 hours ago
This is hilarious. You can’t fix stupid, but it can starve itself to death.

@vandalayindustries3057
1 hour ago
And the one single common denominator in American urban decay, social unrest, and crime is……..

@ridingrules10000
4 hours ago
“How does it help you to not loot target?” How does it help you to not sleep with your neighbor’s wife? How does it help you to not slap your boss in the face? How does it help you to not shoot yourself in the foot?

@rickyclark4870
5 hours ago

@truthwarstv
3 hours ago
As a wise man once said Jogger’s are going to Jog….
1

@justinbailey6515
8 hours ago
Never underestimate the power of stupid.
7

@nitewatchman1576
8 hours ago
If I lived there, and had a business there, there would of been a foot deep of used shell casings. The building would not of been touched.

@FreeAimDog
7 hours ago
this is why i usually say walk with a german shepherd or doberman pincher but they probably wont stop a mob of 100 + cowards. the dog would probably get stomped out trying to protect you and have seizures from cortex/spinal cord damage.

@RIFFRAFF104
43 minutes ago
Lock and Load good people. Never again. Take these thugs out if this ever happens again.

@eudaenomic
6 hours ago
Luckily, in San Antonio, the destructive rioters participating were curtailed and controlled after a small amount of damage occurred.
1

@themeanhornet1070
4 hours ago
I didn’t feel a thing.

@JM-nm3oo
9 hours ago
yeah basically, the city is at a point of no return, crime is up, carjackings even
having branched out into nearby wealthy suburbs
5

@dougdonelson9471
8 hours ago
Perkins was a nice little chain restaurant. Open 24 hrs for your convenience. Pretty good food. Definitely catered to the late night crowd if ya know what i mean. Had one in my city for a while but it closed down years ago. One of our local political folk heroes would hold meetings there. Good times.

1 reply

@swollenmadman16
6 hours ago
It’s ironic that you stopped at 3:00, with the NBC logo showing at the bottom. Do you think NBC would cover that kind damage done by a riot nowadays?

@Willyousitonmyface
50 minutes ago
Thanks to the media

@NeperaPark
8 hours ago
certain people are not happy unless they live in a literal toilet along with the smells associated with a full toilet. it brings them joy.

@xxxm981
3 hours ago
Reminds me of that comparison picture of Hiroshima vs Detroit.

@richardlbowles
8 hours ago
“Passengers, this is your pilot speaking. We are just about to land at Minneapolis Airport. Please remember to put your watches back fifty years.”
3

@jamesmorrison7989
8 hours ago
“How does it help you to not loot target?”
Well Trevor, I understand you don’t live in Minneapolis, and neither do I thank god, but I think we can clearly see the cons that come with looting target. The city is a dumpster fire now. Anyone who has resources to invest will stay clear away from cities where targets are being looted, especially when it gets to Minneapolis levels of looting
1

@depressobbq404
2 hours ago
Perkins is an old half dead chain (there are a handful in Ohio)

@reallifeawesome5400
2 hours ago
Have you heard of the Tulsa race riots? No one talked about them outside the state of OK

@Sacto1654
5 hours ago
Interestingly, in ethnic Asian and (most) ethnic Hispanic communities, they’ve managed to build (and thrive!) many new businesses catering to their own communities. Look at the many successful Asian and Hispanic supermarkets in the Los Angeles, CA area, for starters.
1

1 reply

@jak9955
1 hour ago
Unnecessary Reparations have been Paid In Full.
1

@aaronwilkinson8963
8 hours ago
Don’t look at these places and people with pity. They wanted this.
4

@cnnblackmailsupport1375
6 hours ago
Evil. The only fix is going to be a reversal of Blackstone’s formulation. “It’s better that 10 innocent suffer than 1 guilty person goes free.”
It’s too much.

@JasonZimmerman1980
7 hours ago
Dude has never heard of a Perkins? I guess I’ve never really looked into where all of the branches are, so maybe Perkins is only a Midwest thing? They’re all over the place….well, they used to be all over the place in MN, but there are less of them than there used to be, but there are still quite a few.

@angiebervinkle1575
1 hour ago
They tried in my town and everyone went with Thier guns to protect the businesses and they quickly left and never came back

@ampeater777
3 hours ago (edited)
I can’t feel bad for communities so willing to destroy what they have and then turn around and blame it on other people or racism. I feel pity for the people truly hurt by this, but beyond that no

@supfreshitsourturnbaby5093
5 hours ago
“we dont own anything” and you never will

@v-2010
9 hours ago (edited)
Ughhh I usually listen to the previous day’s Tim Pool episode in the morning. The Surfs is unbearable though. Thank you for giving me something else.
20

9 replies

@neilhernandez7625
8 hours ago
That Perkins is the only thing that wasn’t destroyed during the riots, they closed close to 10 years ago. Everything else is pretty much destroyed. They should’ve showed where the pawn shop used to sit on the opposite side of the Denny’s.

@bryanlamm8107
5 hours ago
for Popeye’s endorsement.

@hcv66666
1 hour ago
you know the thing! Run away from that thing!

@matthewdolton8654
4 hours ago
The sad thing is that rioting and looting will be repeated over and over again as soon as a career criminal gets shot by a cop while resisting arrest. So zero lessons were learned at all.

@Krysnha
4 hours ago
The evil, can not build, it can only corrupt

@timterell6671
7 hours ago
Im so tired of hearing about George Floyd he finally got what he spent his whole life asking for
4

@ninjagirl226
4 hours ago
Perkins is the most amazing chain. It’s a 24 h restaurant and bakery. They have half off pie and apps and an unlimited pancake deal after 9 pm.
Favorite college hangout; sad to see.

@FluffsuneGaming
7 hours ago
Thing is a lot of business lots also require taking care of their local area/plot so no businesses means the place slowly develops into an overgrown, littered and graffitied mess. So basically they’re successfully turning their own city into a slum and blaming everyone else for it.
5

@railroad2258
52 minutes ago
Couldn’t happen to a more deserving body of voters.

@shirinshirazi
5 hours ago
I experienced the LA riots as a child.. the community has still not recovered, the best thing around there is a Ross and bebe’s or Marshalls with 24hr police. All you see are food trucks, used clothes stands. The only people who were able to recover with their own effort where the Asians/middle eastern. The few black owned places never came back. The screw themselves.

@dougcharles5004
4 hours ago
It’s time to fight violence with violence.

@emalinedickinson7492
9 hours ago
Part of the issue is that “black community”, the second term. Community. I am not part of a “community” just because I live in an apartment complex: if my neighbor wants me to join some sort of cause, fuck no I got shit to do. It always boils down to the individual, and bringing a bunch of individuals into a singular cause is COMPLEX.
11

4 replies

@incinerator1016
29 minutes ago
Perkins is a chain like ihop, here in NJ we have an ihop next to a perkins and both stay open somehow.

@BluePatch-pc7sx
7 hours ago
As a father I resent that George floyd is called a father, it is my understanding floyd spent most his time behind bars not raising his kids. As a father I spend my time making sure my family has a roof over their heads and food on the table. That is my job as a dad! So you my identify as a dad and father, but if you do not put the work-in, YOU ARE NOT!!! CAN YOU DIG IT!!!
1

@santiagorodriguezguillen2281
5 hours ago
What you can say? we got what we voted for.

@Zillion3170
2 hours ago (edited)
It take years for societies ransacked by riots to recover. I grew up in Tulsa. Ok, and the Greenwood area finally started rebuilding…it took roughly 100 years though.

@alfredoalcantar8691
1 hour ago
But reee he was a good person

@christopherrocco56
8 hours ago
I live across the river in St Paul so I got to watch Mogadishu burning across the river. This video that you’re making is not untrue, even today there are still buildings that are unoccupied or torn down and not replaced. There is family generations of businesses that have been there for a hundred plus years and in one night of Summer Love they were obliterated and never recovered.
Also, FYI, Perkins has like a slightly fancier Denny’s and it is a chain in the midwest but some of them are also family-owned
7

@smellymala3103
6 hours ago
Prevent riots: respond to aggressive policemen with lethal force not submission.

@quijybojanklebits8750
7 hours ago
It wasnt a complete loss our 2a is getting stronger and we got Kyle Rittenhouse

@yaboimax6356
1 hour ago
13:59 Tell that to David Dorn.

@sdlausen1
2 hours ago
Honestly, it wasn’t locals that destroyed the area. Many videos show people driving in who were most likely aNtiFA and FBI destroying buildings.

@gilligan80
4 hours ago
The auto zone the cop was busting the windows out of….

1 reply

@cympimpin20
9 hours ago
Worst farm equipment investment in history.
67

4 replies

@qzwxecrv0192837465
4 hours ago
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” – George Santayana, The Life of Reason, 1905
lack of education creates an unnoticed ignorance in those that do such things. Who would want to start a business in Detroit, Minneapolis, etc after all this?

@edwinnaidu
4 hours ago
Man, i hate viewing any group of peoples as a monoliths, but seeing how easier manipulated some races are is shocking, given its so very easy to research and look back at how similar mentalities led to nothing but turmoil. I grew up thinking i was going to be the daft one in the group, but the older i get, the more i loose faith in people.

1 reply

@jackryan7767
4 hours ago
Even the trees are gone!

@keltonschleyer6367
7 hours ago
Yeah, Popeyes > Chic Fil A for spicy chicken sandwiches. But I’ll happily take either any day!
1

@angiebervinkle1575
1 hour ago
This is why I don’t care let them live with it
1

@hogefinance7251
7 hours ago
With cell phones being everywhere I wonder if there’s video footage of each of these buildings being attacked.
6

2 replies

@radman6797
7 hours ago
Perkins is like a Dennys or a Shari’s believe they have gone out of business by now completely. Was a okay place to eat.

@SpeedBoost
1 hour ago
Seeing them tearing down their own businesses and infrastructure brought a good few tears of joy to my eyes!
They literally proved everybody right!
They can only destroy, they are physically incapable of creating or maintaining anything!
It’s not a coincidence that their own neighbourhoods are always the most dangerous and rundown neighborhoods in every town!
They do it to themselves and they celebrate each other for causing as much damage as possible!

@ekscalybur5247
1 hour ago
“We don’t own that”
Yeah, you don’t. And it’s 100% your fault you don’t.

@CrowofApproval
8 hours ago
Perkins is regional. There’s one in just about every decent sized town here in Iowa.

@sophalheng
55 minutes ago
“We don’t own anything!”
Me: yeah you don’t own that hair neither. That’s someone else’s hair. Burn it off

@KantiDono
8 hours ago
I’ll never forgive Fentanyl for killing George Floyd.
9

@puddleofthoughts2822
5 hours ago
When you learn about the collapse of the Roman empire, you know for a fact that America’s time has come.

@bobbygermano9926
6 hours ago
We had 2 Perkins on SI.
1 in BK. All closed. Used to be good.

@josephfalardeau7841
5 hours ago
by vandalisming or destroying store they sedn a clear message they don’t want store in their community

@TheMhannah100
4 hours ago
Perkins is like a higher end Denny’s.

@notmypotato3730
3 hours ago
Good! those people. They deserve it all.

@keithsargent6963
8 hours ago
They haven’t learned and they never will.
3

@stuartegrin7543
8 hours ago
love the graffiti it’s telling

@rufeo2826
6 hours ago
Perkins was my favorite breakfast spot growing up. Very disappointing

@geroutathat
18 minutes ago
Should never let the people that cheered it on forget, I mean trevor noah isnt even american, how does he sleep at night.

@phillipsims2425
7 hours ago
Your wife must be a good cook!! Love ya

@Superduper666
3 hours ago
14:11 Trevor Noah should go to jail
1

@matthewbrantner798
7 hours ago
4:46 why should someone respect you and your culture when you don’t respect theirs?
5

@seanparker4461
5 hours ago
Popeye’s and Chic Filet are both pretty good, they’re just different. Chic Filet is the upscale and Popeye’s is the ghetto. The prices reflect this. But, as far as their spicy chicken sandwiches go – they’re both pretty awesome.
1

@nsob8897
3 hours ago
I had popeyes chicken for the first time ever a couple of months ago and it was the shit. Those little chicken nuggets they have are fantastic and the taters n gravy was no slouch either.
Perkins on the other hand stopped being good in the 80s. Dont go!!! Haha

@xvonpocalypse3435
8 minutes ago
Damn. They destroyed the fried chicken factory.

@ramieskola7845
6 hours ago
People of certain persuasion are quite easy to incite into irrational violence.
An interview of a prison psychiatrist by C. Flaherty illuminates the root problem convincingly.

@roberthicks9191
2 hours ago
liberty city, a maimi suburb has never really recovered from 1960’s riots

@jocktheripper2073
7 hours ago
They’re just a bit homesick, so they’re redeveloping the area to look more like Africa.
4

@redactedc1928
2 hours ago
You are an interesting individual, you must talk to a lot of black people.

@PrincipalProductions
4 hours ago
This is gonna be every city this is the end of this country

@benrider6353
8 hours ago
as a current resident i cant wait to get out of this city

@billbaum1706
5 hours ago
Gonerners and mayors allowed this

@briansharp4388
8 hours ago
Ok, here’s the thing….they tear up the whole area they live. Drive out bussiness that they need to live there, destroy housing where they live. Then they’ll just move too another place and do it all over again.
3

@shanegrayson7068
3 hours ago
Dude, no, Popeye’s spicy chicken sandwich is fire.

@georgescurious2717
8 hours ago
…yet Sean these are same people crying about businesses not opening in their communities and the one that are there, are closing their doors.

@muhdikyomouf9490
5 hours ago
We didn’t have these problems in DFW.

@Mike-tp1wb
8 hours ago
I live in Greater Minnesota. Those of us who don’t live in Minneapolis/St. Paul used to go down there a lot for venues, sports, shopping, ect. Now? You’d have to find someone who goes down there because they want to. Minneapolis is far too dangerous to live in or even visit. Hell, there were 3 shootings at the Mall of America within weeks of each other, some by people who came to Minneapolis from Chicago. These weak-kneed politicians who run these cities have ran them well…into the ground. If native Minnesotans won’t bring their money to the Twin Cities, you can bet your ass others are doing the same thing. Unless these leaders of America’s cities fix their shit, this is only going to get worse.

@jonasweiss5817
3 hours ago
The country is not “absolutely devastated”, but it may be having issues.

@souljahtite17
8 hours ago (edited)
Good show GREAT content
3

@jasonmaclean719
3 hours ago
And now the media and even people in Congress are pushing for justice for Jordan Neely. It’ll be Floyd 2.0

@MayhemMby
7 hours ago
Shocking, when natural events decimate an area people are quicker to reinvest in it than when the hoard go wildling through it and destroy it. Who would have guessed?
A storm, you can see coming, can predict and prepare as best you can for to mitigate the damage. A throng of destructive looters and rioters who don’t care what they destroy (until their neighborhood is devastated and businesses won’t come back when they cry about not having places to shop or jobs) can’t be predicted, can’t be prepared for. That’s the difference.

@rash9488
2 hours ago
Wendy’s 4 Alarm Spicy Chicken Sandwich from almost 2 decades ago was the best ever….

@viasevenvai
8 hours ago
This channel is great. Who else is explaining how other races are having hate crimes committed against them?

@lunar_locust
5 hours ago
There goes the neighborhood

@liftedgifted6211
9 hours ago
did you consider the systemic systemism of systematic systemicism?
8

@asmkalrizion7078
6 hours ago
just because you don’t own the local farm doesn’t mean you don’t need its food

@jasonking1284
5 hours ago
Wasn’t Chaz supposed to be a new garden of eden and save the day…..

@Talot
2 hours ago
Why invest in a community that will burn it down at a moment’s notice… and maybe more importantly, who will insure something in that community?

@zacksshed7585
8 hours ago
Perkins is a chain , not bad food not super great either , but if you need food and a comfortable place to eat they work.

@jamesd5701
41 minutes ago
Maybe the people in these areas can pay reparations to the business owners.

@thisguy4505
9 hours ago
Derek Chauvin did nothing wrong
52

4 replies

@ianbelletti6241
1 hour ago (edited)
The moral here is that lawlessness chaces the lawful who do actual good for the community away and it takes a long time for the lawful to decide it’s safe to come back to the community. Natural disasters don’t do the same long lasting psychological damage to the community.

@hornetguy9063
5 hours ago
There’s nothing stopping these people from owning things.
Finish high school. Stay out of jail. Work full time. Don’t have kids out of wedlock. And, God forbid, leave the hood for places with lower CoL and job opportunities. Plenty of places in America where you can buy a home off a $50k a year income.

@michaelpau1583
4 hours ago
I bet there are food deserts in the community for some reason.

@warrengoss7547
6 hours ago
Black culture is so rich and interesting.
1

@scarletlegg
4 hours ago
They still act like they are in the jungle.

@gristle_lumps8190
9 hours ago
I have it under good authority that it’s okay because these business owners have insurance
14

1 reply

@dandare9055
3 hours ago
TBH I am shocked by how little talk there is about that… the scale seems to be a humanitarian crisis type of thing.
I was not expecting it was THAT bad. It seem like few dozens of dead was ‘just’ few dozens of dead considering collateral damage.

@cliffcampbell8827
6 hours ago
“When you transfer ownership…” To who? Members of the community? All of the upstanding members of the community left the community so who are the members of the community left? They are the ones burning and looting, do you think they are going to run a business?

@KamikazeIsaaku
2 hours ago
Damn, they stole a whole ass popeyes
1

1 reply

@LeatonNick
8 hours ago
One option is to get the feds out of welfare. Make welfare a local issue. Each state runs their own welfare system.
1

@swaggoffosaurmunchakoopas2013
4 hours ago
wow they ate the entire popeyes

@DF-hl2ds
9 hours ago
You had 69 likes, and I made it 70. I sincerely apologize.
9

2 replies

@thompson1558
1 hour ago
Perkin is GREAT and don’t you dare challenge the Lord’s chicken sandwhich!

@soronir3526
7 hours ago
The Culver’s spicy chicken sandwich is the best, though.

@ripmemes8962
3 hours ago
greedy people not “good people”

@rileyfahl9787
7 hours ago
No one brings down the black community like the black community

@user-es4xj5wu1x
5 hours ago
Them liquor stores must have been really racist to loot all that alcohol.

@erkl8823
7 hours ago
13:38 her shirt should say “I can’t breeve “…
6

@mike2245
5 hours ago
And people are shocked and wondering why business after business is closing and leaving Portland and other cities. Businesses are out to make money PERIOD. Not to help employees, Not to help the community or anyone else, they are out to put money in the owners wallets. And anyone stupid enough to stop them from that is to blame for them packing it in, cutting their losses and leaving creating the poor conditions and poverty that area is now in.

@billietyree2214
2 hours ago
None of this could have happened without the approval of the bureaucratic machine in DC. We still have rubber bullets, tear gas, dogs and clubs. If the rioting were happening in the Martha’s Vinyard, it wouldn’t last ten minutes.

@v13r3r
5 hours ago
Don’t worry, insurance will cover it.

@danishdogbreath
7 hours ago
Fallout 5 looks amazing.

@get1rocstartim5
4 hours ago (edited)
Did she ever think to get a JOB.. You have to actually go to WORK to own a house a car.

@Punkertoon
9 hours ago (edited)
Sean,
Let me just say,
“Popeye’s chicken is fucking awesome.”
6

2 replies

@hunn20004
4 hours ago
I am for reinforcing the social contract,
We, who do not wish to share the country with these people that burn down neighbourhoods, won’t have taxes go towards them, but for our own neighbourhoods, while they can have all the responsibility they want by paying for all the social systems themselves and not receiving anything from us, who according to them, are breaking their social contract.
As seen in Portland, even without my measure, big businesses will move out all by themselves.

@uncleterry2148
6 hours ago
It’s the woke mindset of the city officials and the people that elected them that is the reason Minneapolis will join the ranks of Portland, Baltimore, and San Francisco as once great cities that died of self inflicted wounds.

@GrimrDirge
5 hours ago
Where do they begin? The rubble, or their sins?

@billpaxton1345
8 hours ago (edited)
its funny how the buildings are still “standing” and there are people just walking by everyday and nothing is done to take it down lol. not around me, thats why i dont care and if you think it can happen around here youll have a hell of a time doing something like that in south Mississippi. and trevor noah is the reason why i wouldnt mind catching a charge for aggravated assault

@angiebervinkle1575
1 hour ago
Look at these places today businesses and jobs gone forever grocery and drug stores gone what w did ppl think would happen

@andrewbochicchio2232
9 hours ago
Did somebody steal half of her hair?
3

@fasteddie5936
8 hours ago
Sean, I know you like truth, so let me clarify what you said about Detroit. I grew up there and lived thru what you were talking about. The Detroit Riots happened in July of 1967, and were among the most destructive in US history in that over 30 people died and there was massive amount of destruction. Martin Luther King was assassinated in April of 1968, some 9 months later. To my memory, there was not much rioting in Detroit when that happened, as there was in other cities. Hope you’ll put an update about that as you usually correct what you said in error. Thanks

@morganmadison366
6 hours ago
Insurance is very expensive, and insurance companies won’t insure you if risk is too high.
Businesses often have to get large deductibles or only get fire insurance and no coverage for theft.
Even very large businesses are often “self-insured”/pay out of pocket for the first large portion of losses like the first $500,000-a million. It’s the only way to get insurance.
Insurance is a profit based business, not a guaranteed lot lose money business.

@thesoloist2490
3 hours ago
Let’s purge them.
1

@peanutdoggie8917
4 hours ago
I think it’s obvious that ending Welfare is a MUST. Also a reestablishment of a penal colony island in the Atlantic for repeat violent offenders should be seriously considered in my opinion. Repeat violent offenders should be moved OFF the mainland and away from civilization.
1

@tsunamirojomajore1762
3 hours ago
Perkins is a chain restaurant akin to Dennys.

@jonathanpollock5386
9 hours ago
Looks like “Escape from New York”
3

@Bowhunterohio
6 hours ago
The communities should have came together and protected their city’s and stores. The people that was rioting came from across the US. I can almost bet there was only a few locals that participated in destroying their city’s. More could have been done. The national guard should have been called and and the local police could have joined. They could have used force and that would have prevented something like that from happening again. Instead we arrested people like Kyle Rittenhouse that was just protecting himself. It’s just a sad outcome and this country has went downhill since.

@joevalentine2048
7 hours ago
Take a drive down Springfield Avenue in Newark NJ and see how the riots of the 60’s have affected this once thriving shopping are. Has it recovered? I don’t know. I will not be driving down this road. It would make an interesting add on to your research. Perhaps a Google trip would be better

@franklinshaki9
5 hours ago
No it’s not driving them to property it’s driving them into there own doom

@stephenyoung1484
5 minutes ago
They should just put a huge wall around the destroyed cities so they have to live in the world they created. It will also prevent them from coming to your area to do the same.

@grantsamson2384
2 hours ago
The difference between riots and hurricanes is that hurricanes don’t destroy public trust.

@tali3san337
9 hours ago
Koreans have a better work ethic than we do… it’s racism
4

@hellbound9136
3 hours ago
That large yelling woman wearing her hero on her shirt is losing her mind. We need these businesses in our communities. If we want to own anything, we have to pool resources like others do and purchase if we can’t do it individually. Burning the neighborhood solves nothing. Being angry and stupid is a bad combination.

@bufordhighwater9872
6 hours ago
While I don’t agree with what happened in Minneapolis-St. Paul, from the murder of Floyd through the riots. But it’s easy to point fingers and blame and condemn. It’s hard to fix the problems.

@AthenaSaints
5 hours ago (edited)
Detroit after 1967 riot. Detroit turned into Chernobyl. History repeat itself. Detroit did not start to recover until 2014.

@clfieldsballer
1 hour ago
It’s clear the black community isn’t helping their situation, but they are far from solely to blame. 500 years of oppression followed by 0 attempts to bring them towards any kind of financial equality is why we’re experiencing this.

@vn2183
5 hours ago (edited)
‘We don’t own anything’!
Acquiring wealth requires hard work, dedication, sacrifice, blood sweat and tears! Don’t get mad, get to work!!!

@Nut-ml5wc
8 hours ago
I like to get a lil drunk on the weekends and crash my car into buildings. It’s ok because I have insurance.
5

2 replies

@marvinjackson1215
7 hours ago
And everybody that encouraged what happened to Minneapolis and other cities will not invest a dollar for them to rebuild.

@gitrdun3710
48 minutes ago
Thank you, Father, for Your Love, thank You for allowing Your Son, Jesus, to die for our sins. Thank You, Jesus, for Your suffering and the Blood You shed to wash away my sins. Thank You, Holy Spirit, for the peace and comfort You provide each day.
Father, I pray that You allow the Holy Spirit to convict the hearts of man. Father, I pray that they turn away from their ways and acknowledge You, they seek Your forgiveness, and they ask Jesus into their hearts.
Father, please forgive us as a nation. Please do not turn Your back on America. In God We Trust. In Jesus’ name, Amen.

@kevinhenophy8873
5 hours ago
They destroyed their community. Seniors r done where do get your food . Where do take your date.

@kekistaniattackhelicopter2242
7 hours ago
I wonder if there are now places in US, where black people disappear without a trace shortly after entering. Like in all those movies, where family moves in to start a new life and entire town plots agains them.

@elenatramsti5176
1 hour ago
Boarded up businesses, especially those with fences around them and graffiti are basically an announcement to everyone that the area is a “no-go” zone — FOREVER. Write these places off because they will never come back. Businesses in other parts of the city will start to move out as well in order to avoid this fate. This is how you destroy a city, a country and a nation.

@nickwilson5774
9 hours ago
Little firary …… but “Mostly” Peacful…..
3

@ObservingLibertarian
1 hour ago
6:25 The continual comparison to war zones is more accurate than you think: I did a cross comparison of the casualty rates in Iraq and Afghanistan during the wars there (when those were still active) and then examined that data next to Chicago. Neither beat Chicago – and only during the worst “surges” did Iraq manage to beat Chicago… for – that – month…. So called “inner city” areas should be considered active war zones – because they wrack up more casualties than actual war zones. Mind you I used Chicago because the data was easy to get – but Chicago isn’t the most violent city in America… most years Chicago isn’t even in the top 10 most violent.

@SuperOdyss
4 hours ago
Possibly. Will there be an effort to make our cities crime free like in the 80s 90s and 00s? Will there be a desire by young people to rejuvenate downtown cores and gentrify old housing?

@bobbackward6461
1 minute ago
From what I hear, Minneapolis was existing in kind of a destroyed state beforehand…

@OuroborosChoked
14 seconds ago
“We don’t own that!”
And by burning down and victimizing anyone who might want to help you, you never will. Trying to save the black community from itself reminds me of the frog and the scorpion.
Eventually, the frogs won’t be around anymore, and it’ll be, “good luck, scorpions.”

@Scott-xb7ov
21 seconds ago
n April of ‘68, I was 4 years old and physically attacked and beaten by a large group of older black girls roaming my area. Subsequently, I’ve been physically attacked by groups of black women on three separate occasions. This is not to mention the numerous attacks by black males. All of these attacks were for no reason other than my skin color. I’ve since learned how to fight back.

@markmitchell5051
8 hours ago
Look as a black man of character I truly apologize to all affected by these terrorist activists. This is Biden’s build back better plan! Jan 6 was the rebuke to democratic politics.
3

1 reply

@AiWERone
5 hours ago
I agree with you on mostly everything but comparing it to war zones is a little too much

@reesegibson6237
4 hours ago (edited)
Dude, when you look at the side by side pictures, the weather seems to be worse in the “after” photos. Democrat cities are actually turning into mordor. But maybe that’s just me

@hattorihanzo2275
7 hours ago
We need more people from Korea and Taiwan in America. They get it and are rabidly anti-communist.
1

@riskybniss5914
29 minutes ago
Rap lyrics preach the doctrine “don’t know how to act”.

@BadWolf1958
45 minutes ago
All the rioting happened at the height of Covid. I found it odd our political figures on the left said rioting didn’t spread Covid, but normal every activity did.
My wife pre Covid worked in down town MPLS. I never had a worry with her working there. Post riot as retired people we to this day will not set foot in MPLS due to the high crime rates

@Dunge0n
5 hours ago
I hate life.

@UFOsIdentified
8 hours ago (edited)
Saint Floyd Syndrome. It’s terminal. San Fran and Portland are next.
3

@Douglamagne
4 hours ago
It definitely has long term impacts. When looking for a house, if you’re smart, you won’t just look at prices and crime levels in the immediate areas around a prospective home. You also have to look at whether or not BLM rioters got close, how close, and how the local government handled the situation. If it’s not adequate, don’t buy. Same goes for choosing a location for a business. So that means prospective businesses will pass on your area if it was hit by the riot. You would think local authorities would understand this and have worked much harder to actually protect their communities from the rioters, but they didn’t and now everyone there suffers due to their lack of insight and leadership.

@shawnfinlay4952
7 hours ago
What these idiots fail to understand is the fact that businesses do NOT magically appear after they’re burned or destroyed. You need people with the money, investors and developers, to build and start new businesses. Why would anyone want to invest one red cent in a community that the people living there, have a history of destroying their community if they become angry. That is a high risk investment most businesses won’t make.

@nancyborden5860
1 hour ago
Some people are like a flock of ducks and chickens , they poop where they eat !

@pearlywhite123
2 hours ago
Vanilla birth rates, achievement rates, coupling rates should be the focal point of your interest

@angiebervinkle1575
1 hour ago
Do they think we care at all not our problem

@jasoncornell1579
8 hours ago
“We don’t own anything” yeah well enjoy ur empire of ashes because that’s all urs now
7

1 reply

@Gumberculesus
6 hours ago
You would have to be insane to think the CFA sandwich is better than Popeye’s.

1 reply

@jrutman4441
8 hours ago
Perkins is a chain very similar to IHOP… Only much much better

@Simon-ml4lu
55 minutes ago
And I’m from the UK so right back at you MoFo’s. what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

@superturkle
17 minutes ago
sometimes the best option available when dealing with violent idiots is to just wall them in and let them fight it out amongst themselves. toss in a few race hustlers for good measure, its a win win for everyone

@valerieclark4580
19 minutes ago
The people who need to watch are not watching. They still don’t give a care.

@jbp4532
9 hours ago
I’m waiting for the video about Lance making a Lance of himself on Timcast IRL last night.
7

1 reply

@markmcgoveran6811
5 hours ago
What good does it do you to not loot Target? You might want to go there and buy something to eat and cook it at your house in a pan you bought there.

@cineris2389
2 hours ago
Where we’re heading will make this look like nothing. Why? because rather than look at the root causes of such national instability, and address them, be it BLM riots, Jan 6th or just simply going postal on steroids (which has basically become a normal day to day expectation) . People would rather use it all as a political tool, to create more strife, finger wagging and as a warry. We’re in desperate need of more moderate viewpoints being lifted.

@isaacgorski6054
6 hours ago
So… trevor noah encouraged this and had influence on this… and will never face responsibility

@stanbartsch1984
1 hour ago
The Watts Riots produced no discernible improvement in the lives of those who lived in the area. Riots only hurt the communities they occur in – which is what made some of the BLM riots so tragic. Outside agitators came in and rioted amid legitimate local protesters. My daughter is in Birmingham, and she said you could tell there were two distinct groups during the BLM events – there were peaceful protestors upset by an outrageous event, and there were opportunists ready to burn it all down, without regard to the devastating effects that had on local economies. The latter should have been locked up – but ever since Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake said protestors “need space to destroy” it’s been open season in liberal cities….

@robinaustrin8193
54 minutes ago
Well make them all live there and enjoy the life they now have

@groverrogers6916
9 hours ago
You make it hard to “like” these videos with titles like Minneapolis will never recover. I liked your video but dang now it looks like I’m like “yes fk Minneapolis”
3

@Arcane740
7 hours ago
That woman doesn’t honestly believe anything she is saying. Why doesn’t she rebuild her community with her own stuff? I bet real estate prices on burnt out, abandoned shell buildings are pretty low in Minneapolis

@GenoSalvati
56 minutes ago
Dear Trevor Noah:
The Ferguson Target closed after being looted. Now where do Ferguson residents shop?
The QuickTrip with the “don’t snitch” message was burned down and never reopened. Now where do Ferguson residents get gas?
Is this what you were hoping for? Mission accomplished? What good did the riots do?

@daveofyorkshire301
2 hours ago
Anybody still wondering why business are pulling out of these lawless, anarchical zones where they suffer losses that nobody does anything about? This is the consequence of not providing a safe area to trade, it’s simple – trading goes somewhere safer….
1

@thelast9021
5 hours ago
I often wonder if yoi dug deep into BLM you would find rich land investors who wanted property values to plumet so they could buy them cheap.

@MEEG0L
2 minutes ago
They turned these places into Africa
1

@bobbybands4506
9 hours ago
BoweL Movement.
4

@tracexl
3 hours ago (edited)
If you are a chain store owner in this or any other riot-smashed area, leave. Even if you weren’t hit, get out of there. Why? Because the community is attacking itself, which makes your business unsafe. Sure, maybe you’re insured or whatnot, but that’s not the point. “how does it help you to not loot [business]?” It helps because that business stays in your neighborhood and offers job opportunities and the convenience of their goods and services. If they have to deal with being broken into, looted, and burnt down, they’re going to leave, and with it goes jobs and shorter travel for necessities and luxuries. Let communities that can’t act like grown-ass adults deal with not having places to go for resources. They’ll start thinking twice about burning everything down when they know it won’t grow back after.

@erkl8823
6 hours ago
13:38 1st of all, she’s wrong , bleeps own stuff, but 2ndly, if she’s right, if they don’t own anything, then WHY might that be, is she saying bleeps are too dumb to save any $ to buy anything ? Is she saying bleeps are too concerned with owning extremely unnecessary jewelry & clothes & “rims” instead of important investments like owning homes & businesses??? Because if she’s saying that, we just might have a real conversation here, we might actually be able to start the discussion about how the bleep “community” can start to turn things around, but just like a drug addict, the 1st step is recognizing the problem & admitting guilt , & only then can you start to unravel the conditions which are the only actual oppression facing bleeps in current year, which are the conditions they’ve SUPPORTED, for 60+ YEARS!! TEAR DOWN ALL THE “CIVIL RIGHTS” ERA WELFARE FOUNDATION & START FROM THE GROUND UP!!
1

@bidenhunter777
5 hours ago
I didn’t see any riots, nor did
i see any differences between the before and after pictures.
“Helen Keller”

@TheMelstone
3 hours ago
We need a new law that says IF you or your kids commit ANY crime, YOU NO LONGER QUALIFY FOR WELFARE EVER!!! THAT WOULD STOP CRIME FAST!!!

@abegiants
4 hours ago
The main reason that cities like minneapolis will realistically not come back is not just bc of their reckless and careless social and fiscal policies, its more that they dont even recognize that their policies have negative impacts on the popualtion bc they are too busy feeling good about themselves. That or these policies are politically expedient and sadly if you indulge people enough they will go along with almost anything even to their own peril. If there would be a change in mindset they could actually restore some prosperity in that city. It would be difficult but at the very least it would put things in the right direction and provide a vision to move forward and attract investment. This is the consquences of no fanily structure, no community cohesion and lack of financial/civic education on the dichotomy of the rights and responsibilities of the citizens.

@mainegroyper904
9 hours ago
somaliapolis
20

1 reply

@aaronheidengren7854
8 hours ago
I know this has nothing to do with the video but please do a video on the recent Tim Pool episode with The Serfs. he is totally insufferable and should have his arguments torn apart for it.

@scinanisern9845
5 hours ago
Only one thing left to do… DEFUND ALL POLICE!
Do it! You worked hard for this! You earned this in every way! You deserve it!!!! Defund the police COMPLETELY!!!

@Universe7-LordFrieza
27 minutes ago
Mostly peaceful

@xray606
8 hours ago
I’m from the midwest, and I’ve never really understood MN. I mean, you expect a certain level of liberal nonsense in a big city, but… MN is pretty blue overall now. More than IL for sure. It’s really strange. I don’t know how it got that way. You can explain it with neighboring states near CA, but… I’m in L.A. and I’ve never heard a single person say they’re going to MN. I was here during the King riots, and I’ll never forget it. I lost my faith in humanity those days, and I never got it back. Those days taught me that there’s a culture of people in society that are just waiting for the right moment to go out and do the worst things they can dream up.

@cavaleer
4 hours ago
Minnesotans gotta buck up and get over that “nice” shyt.

@TheWrathsblade
9 hours ago
I was a kid when he LA Riots happened, apartment building next to mine got lit up and they started trying to bust into my apt to loot.
Been living in Minnesota since 2010 and never thought I’d end up seeing the riots 2.0, but here we are. This country has become so broken, unfortunately.
4

@michaelconnors7668
8 hours ago
The Second Amendment states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State…” It’s the duty of local, state and federal government to ensure domestic tranquility. it’s in the Constitution. There are old laws like the 1714 Riot Act and the 1757 Militia Act enacted to ensure the public peace. It’s an old story: when governments do not ensure the public peace equity investment stops. In Minneapolis the investment drain has picked up the pace. Walmart and other retailers are closing up shop and moving out. And community leaders want answers. If democrats were tough on crime, they’d be world beaters. But no. We’re in for a rough time in this country. You’re on your own and you have to solve your our own problems.

@mason4354
7 hours ago
Popeye’s is superior to all others

@WarChild-is9bk
22 minutes ago
Wakanda forever!

@ampeater777
3 hours ago
I never understood the “insurance will cover it” argument. Only people who have never had to use insurance would say such a ridiculous thing because those companies will do every last little thing in their power to weasel out of paying. The normal use of car insurance or any form of house insurance for anything serious is to just sue the company and hope they fold. I was hit by a drunk driver and I provided dash cam footage, had multiple witnesses, and the tire marks on the road were undeniable as to who was at fault, and I still had to take geico to court. I lost almost half my coverage payment due to lawyer fees. And still the only reason I got that much was because a friend on the inside told me how to legally kick them in the nuts because the situation was so disgusting that he could not support his companies decision to try and fuck me out of what i was owed by rights. He quit immediately afterwards. Fuck geico and insurance companies in general

@KV-S2K
2 hours ago
Smart things thinking it’s beneficial to destroy where you live. Geniuses!

@anthonymonaghan4964
3 hours ago
insurance should not have paid anything out as these terroristic riots were preventable by actually deploying police forces fully armed and taking out the most violent terrorists

@phookadude
6 hours ago
It would be easy for people to start businesses in their own communities. 3 people on welfare could rotate running a convenience store and dealing with childcare loan are easy to get for impoverished communities and minorities. The reason they don’t and foreigners do is the foreigners don’t know what they are getting into with those neighborhoods. The foreigners buy it from a cousin and then after 5 years they have enough money to get out they sell it to another cousin.

@coolclearwater7396
1 hour ago
Wow, it doesn’t seem that long since Saint Floyd overdosed.

@MikeSmith-ch7jv
13 minutes ago
Fun fact, the reason the LA riots stopped was the pissed off Koreans. After seeing the destruction of their property, and little to no help from the cops, they knew something had to be done. So the Koreans sat on the roofs of their property and shot any rioters coming their way. This lead to several gun fights, forcing the hands of government to intervene. A lesson can be learned from this.

@carltonbanxx9804
4 hours ago
Ive been listening to your video, i honestly thought you was black. I’d like to do a video on this also…
1

@gertexan
8 hours ago
@9:36 The EFFING arrogance of a South African import lecturing Americans is stratospheric. This guy has bought into his own hype.
6

1 reply

@jaysaburo5108
3 hours ago
Nobody knows Americans and what’s good for Americans and especially in Minnesota than Trevor!

@TROOPERfarcry
8 hours ago
Turning off welfare would fix most of this. People who have to work for a living do not stay up all night getting drunk, high, and destroying whatever they can.
To be sure, “work” won’t make people honest or decent, but a lot of this behavior is what happens when people have too much time on their hands. Nobody that has to earn their calories will waste calories dancing on top of over-turned vehicles. Bonus: it would help with the rampant diabetes in that community.

@EtotheFnD
3 hours ago
Sean Fitzgerald…WHERE WERE YOU ON JANUARY 6TH…WHERE WERE YOU?
1

@agarthastudio6005
7 hours ago
Theres another good story to be told here about “black” neighborhoods.
I recently saw an Asian woman talking about how she was not allowed to open her business in the nice, “white” neighborhood that she was trying to establish her in. She could only get into the black neighborhood, & was even given incentives to do so. She points out that all these Asians & Indians run businesses in black neighborhoods because of this, while the black people are turned down for the loans that they try to get to open businesses there.
Dudes like this aren’t trying to look into why these ghettos & the people living there are the way they are now though.
1

4 replies

@puckyoutube
6 hours ago
All over a druggie and armed robber

@swordofthespirit9358
9 hours ago
Bring back SEGREGATION
18

7 replies

@xraftermanx
5 hours ago
DETROIT. All cities are about 50 years behind Detroit but catching up rapidly. In the 80s, 90s, 2000s, Detroit was a food desert. Now a few stores have started but are in the gentrified stretch that extends 2 blocks on either side of Woodward Ave where they built the Gentrified Light Rail system that took $40 Million to build 6 miles. SE Michigan self-segregated into pockets of suburbs in a term called white flight but it wasn’t just white people that fled. Everyone that had the means fled. Southfield, Inkster, Ypsilanti, and a few others are almost 100% black suburbs. East Dearborn was/is all Arab and West Dearborn was all white. If you want to see what will happen to the USA just look at SE Michigan where in Wayne County more people vote than there are residents.
And there is the FACT that most of it is built on a swamp with a water table that goes through freeze/thaw cycles and the Govt uses technology from the 1950s to build roads with Union Only Labor in a perpetual cycle of road construction followed by 2 years of potholes. Its a racket. I275 has been repaved and redone 6 times in 12 years. Detroit and really all of Michigan has the worst Road Construction Workers in the World. I would be embarrassed to call myself one but they are the top paid.
So if you want to live in a warzone keep doing what you are doing. In 2006 at the height of the war in Iraq the murder rate dropped in Bagdad to below that of Detroit making it safer in Bagdad during the war than on any given day in Detroit in a time of peace.

@ThePawnisking
8 hours ago
I think the US should have standing riot forces deployable within one hour to any location. Maybe even multiple units for each section of the country to get response time down.

2 replies

@lochdedy8674
5 hours ago
The lesson is for many large and small business owners is don’t build your base of operations in any majority community.

@alp3428
6 hours ago (edited)
These people are ridiculous, if it’s REALLY that bad here, why not move?? By that, I mean another country. That’s right, there is no better place than the US. EVERYONE needs to understand, that if you don’t cherish this place, we won’t have it long. Isn’t Trevor from a country where he in fact had it worse? Where is that same energy when it comes to the country he’s from?? Hmmmm…

@Simon-ml4lu
49 minutes ago
Reparation’s my A.

@tornoutlaw73
5 hours ago
Why you shouldn’t steal or burn down places you don’t own? Maybe, something something food deserts? Something about not having places to shop near your home. Having to pay higher prices.Going to step out on a limb here and say that’s why you don’t destroy those businesses around you. But hey, what do I know…….

@tommygunsFTW
3 hours ago
In slight relation to the LA riots:
blacks have always been envious of, and targeted Asians. We’re supposed to be part of the “minority”, thus meaning we’re “oppressed” yet we thrive. My mother and father came from the Philippines as INCREDIBLY poor immigrants. All of the money went into coming to America legally. For most of my childhood, we lived in the south Bronx in someone’s garage, and then “upgraded” to a 1 bedroom apt in Jamaica, Queens (around the same neighborhood where 50 cent grew up). My parents never made an excuse, they just worked their asses off. We made it out of the ghetto, thanks to them. They ended up making over 6 figures EACH, and that’s all due to the hard work they put in. There was never an excuse. They never blamed “MUH rAciSm”, or the “HUWYTE man”. In fact, I’d argue that White men are the ones that have helped us the MOST. I lost 2 of my cousins through targeted attacks from blacks, so that’s the help that they’ve given me. I know that there are exceptions in this community, but they are few and far between. Instead of bitching, moaning, lack of accountability, spending money on material things instead of investing or saving, STOPPED the violence, etc – they’d prosper the way Asians and Whites do. You can only make excuses for so long. They’re the most privileged group in America, yet they trash said privileges in favor of chaos. When does it stop?

@Hotboi1
2 hours ago
They just wanted the community to look like where they came from: africa

@joeyk19801
6 hours ago (edited)
She doesn’t own anything? Why? Who’s fault is that? I understand she’s angry, but how have the rioters benefited after destroying MPLS? It’s like ppl refuse to realize that you aren’t going to own something you don’t work for. And work is hard. And it requires discipline… I have a feeling she’s not really down to work hard, and stay disciplined until shes in a position become an owner….

@AnthonyMoore-rd7yv
2 hours ago
That’s Good.

@markmccreadie6212
2 hours ago (edited)
Let’s be honest, likely more than half of the violent rioters are likely dead now living the lifestyle they did. Sadly there is thousands ready to take their place in the next riot. Luckily the upside for everyone else is they have to live in Minneapolis

@billnomac1827
5 hours ago
Is there a list available that you could show us of all the good things BLM has done. I’ll wait

@angiebervinkle1575
1 hour ago
And this why we don’t care not our problem. That girl will never own anything with that attitude

@gregrock7451
8 hours ago
How do you suppose the people saying that the looting/destruction of Korean businesses during the LA riots was going to clear the way for black-owned businesses reconciled that notion with the mass destruction of black-owned businesses in LA during the same riots?
Surely I’m not the only one who remembers the heart-wrenching video of the middle-aged black man crying hysterically and screaming at all the locals destroying the business he’d busted his ass for years and years to build during the LA riots, riot?
Oh, wait…they didn’t reconcile anything…or even think…because they were (and presumably still are) ignorant pieces of s—.

@lylelarson1943
6 hours ago
Something else a lot of those protesters we’re not from the local area or state

@pygmalionsrobot1896
2 hours ago
I’m definitely not brainwashed by Left or Right thinking … but I do agree with you on this video. And when I see people talking about a rebound for Detroit, it literally makes me LOL, very loudly, because they STILL have not broken out of the denial about how they got to where they are today. They are STILL delusional about the causes of the fall of Detroit, and this will (guaranteed) prevent them from getting their city back on it’s feet. Keep in mind, in the 1950’s Detroit was considered The Most Prosperous City On The Planet. Today … it is an ashtray.

@guitarken6446
4 hours ago
So Trevor Noah said how does it help not looting Target. Insert the word Walmart for Target and then ask the people how they feel about their Walmart or the lack of Walmarts in Chicago. Hahaha

@1-800-WILLIAM
8 hours ago
One need only consider how the historic Greenwood District aka “Black Wall Street” used to thrive until it was destroyed during the Tulsa race massacre by white Oklahomans. That was 100 years ago and it’s still largely undeveloped.
Where black Tulsans once thrived in the area, it is impoverished.
It doesn’t matter the race or ideology of the rioter or business owner. Destroying the means of income injures the community.

@ash_lucario_ship183
1 hour ago (edited)
The far left did this to Minneapolis, all of them should be ashamed of themselves. Everyone who took part in that destruction deserves to be in prison for life.

@zombiehashi3762
6 hours ago
There should be plenty of empty spaces to open more “black owned” businesses in these liberal progressive cities. Hope they enjoy what they’ve created and will vote for again without a doubt.

@guitarken6446
4 hours ago
I got a question, if, and when that area does get controlled by black owned businesses as the quotes in the video described. Would it be justifiable that the Koreans get to burn down the black owned businesses?

@hydrolito
49 minutes ago
Target will still be there so people will still have jobs later if Target is not looted. Why do we need to explain things to Trevor. If businesses destroyed will be fewer jobs and people will have to travel farther to work and to shop.

@blakerackley8874
4 hours ago
Trevor Noah should be held accountable for inciting violence and community destruction.
1

@Andrina-fl9ef
14 minutes ago
I applaud the businesses leaving destructive neighborhoods. I say after all the riot damage nationwide, it’s an insult to ask for reparations. Why put money back into a community they destroyed and will continue to destroy?

@thanelewis8893
6 hours ago
The biggest limit of this video is that it’s not a person of color speaking. Not that anything said is incorrect, but it will be dismissed out of hand because the speaker/producer/narrator is not a minority and “couldn’t possibly understand”.
As for the charities created to recompense the “victims” need only look to the historical precedent of the disaster at Abervan, Wales to see that graft is complete.

@thezackseven
20 minutes ago
Cause billions in damages then turn around and demand billions in reparations for something they never were subjected to.

@MrCuttysark1982
1 hour ago
Just a quick note AJW. I notice you kept saying “you destroyed your own neighborhood and look where it got you.” It should be noted a lot of the BLM riots had imported agitators. I’m not saying there weren’t locals who rioted but when you look at the movement of people, social media, and interviews, you really get the impression that the BLM riots were fueled by outside actors and that many of these communities that got trashed were in part obliterated by outsiders who used the situation to enrich themselves. And that is a problem that needs addressing: cracking down on full time agitators who literally throw gas on the fire.

Actual Justice Warrior
·
1 reply

@bc8648
5 hours ago (edited)
I’m sorry you have to spend time to present and articulate common sense this way

@tcbink
6 hours ago
Protesting is a necessary right but the moment you cause damage to any person or property you are no longer protesting. This needs to be dealt with immediately without prejudice.

@TROOPERfarcry
7 hours ago
The “$2 Billion in damages” does not — and cannot — account for opportunity-costs. Or look at it this way, a stock is valued based on its prediction of future earnings…. what’s the future earnings of a blighted town? Correspondingly, what is the current-value when taking those future-earnings into account?
Or here is yet another way of examining the situation: if Bezos, Gates, or Musk decided to sink $2 billion to restore each of those destroyed buildings and store-fronts to their pre-riot condition… would the local economy then just turn-back-on? No. It would not do that. Just like you can’t take a corpse out of the morgue, heat it to 98.6 degrees Farenheit, put the heart-paddles on the chest, and then expect it to come back. And businesses know this, too, which is why they don’t individually come back — like why Popeyes, or Family Dollar, or Perkins … they can’t just rebuild the store-front and then ‘everything-is-back-to-normal’.

@HLZBORO738
5 hours ago
If they built wakanda why can’t they build Minneapolis lol

@NoBody-pw3kf
5 hours ago
If you own a business or a property it needs to be insured and if a democrat comes to power and lets their voters burn your stuff to the ground you do what the people in Minneapolis did. Take your insurance payout and reinvest it some place else.

@chesto7440
22 minutes ago
destroyed themselfs
1

@Scott-xb7ov
31 seconds ago
In April of ‘68, I was 4 years old and physically attacked and beaten by a large group of older black girls roaming my area. Subsequently, I’ve been physically attacked by groups of black women on three separate occasions. This is not to mention the numerous attacks by black males. All of these attacks were for no reason other than my skin color. I’ve since learned how to fight back.

@baccala49
7 hours ago
Over 80,000 ARMED, for the first time, armed IRS agents is equal to over 3 military divisions. WHY? FYI, there was ONLY 73,000 armed US military that participated in the June 6,1944 D-Day Normandy invasion, WHY does IRS require their own personal ARMY?

1 reply

@rosgill6
7 hours ago
Its fine to live there even though you don’t own it but not ok to protect your home even though you don’t own it? Perfect encapsulation of black apathy. They are unique when it comes to self destruction

1 reply

@SnowLepard92
2 hours ago
Its funny seeing all this shit.. then they complain about their poor circumstances. I feel bad for the business owners ofcourse. They didnt deserve that.

@pete6300
6 hours ago (edited)
Cool story bro. I uses to be empathetic to “the rights” arguments about democrat run cities until I started looking into the campaign investments. The right will never make headway into democrat strongholds because they don’t invest in candidates. The right keeps whining about black people voting 90% democrat but when was the last time republican party leadership actually supported local Republicans.

@Kafagway
2 hours ago
Well… that’s what they wanted right? They cried injustice…they went and got justice that they think they deserved….and now they are living happily ever after . Oh, and they voted the leaders they think will help them. So… at the end, they did GET what they deserved.
Nope. I don’t feel sorry.
1

@williamhancox860
6 hours ago
The Black Panthers were correct. Make an American State possibly California as a black only state and buy an Island hopefully including Haiti as well as another area of land in West Africa to join with Sierra Leon for all the Black American community to live and relax in and thus enabling them to show their outstanding quality enabling them to prosper and show their real qualities in an unprejudiced society.

1 reply

@judywilliamson2068
5 hours ago
Wealthy Black people who have something positive to say about the riots, my question to them would be when you got rich why didn’t you move back into a black neighborhood? Why didn’t you build yourself a mansion in the middle of a black neighborhood? Why aren’t you there helping Black people to have businesses in the black community? But every time I see a black entertainer or other black wealthy person they never go back to the black community. They move in just as close to Martha Stewart as they can!

@jasonreynolds6643
1 hour ago
Do they own stuff after the riots? No? Oops.

@TheDanilushka
7 hours ago
It does not matter for two reasons: 1) city residents voted for the government that let this happen and 2) the city council just vote unanimously to allow an amplified Islam call to prayer to violate the noise ordnances 5 times a day. Perhaps the Islamic government will handle rioters and crime as well as LBGTQ+ differently.

2 replies

@axaaxa6667
5 hours ago
even dogs dont shit where they sleep
1

@mulletbaby01
5 hours ago
I hate to break it to you AJW, before the riots Minneapolis was a hell on Earth. There were murders daily, long before George OD’d on fent and from complications of covid on that day he met a cop who was protected by a city run by liberals. Gangs ran the North side of the city. There was a pipeline from Chicago for fent, coke, meth. It had massive illegal immigration from South America which did lead to poverty. Most of the business gutted very few outside massive chain stores were local small business, and restaurants were minority owned. The city and its leaders did nothing to take care of infrastructure, these same people ran and won for election again even after the riots. The state and city let the riots happen for pure political reasons to hurt the economy, and hurt then President Trump. The hardest attacked were offices, buildings owned by African immigrants because there is deep black racism rifts inside their community. You are right the lie about these places have insurance is a fabrication because they got pennies on the dollar because civil unrest waivers inside the policies most of these places had. Move ahead the area around the Cup store is a no go zone. People who could afford the leave got out. The ones forced to stay are subject to gang members, BLM and antifa thugs carrying AR15’s. Residents in the area they can’t call the cops, fire, EMT’s.

@epi2045
7 hours ago
Your video is very misleading. Have you physically come out to the area??? I live in the area and saw the fires from the riots. It will recover. It already is coming back strong. They have built three luxury condo and apartment complexes during and after BLM. Luxury meaning 1-2 bdrm condos are $1.5-3M and apartments $3K-10K+/mo. A famous chef, James Beard winner, runs a successful restaurant which opened during the riots. It’s jam packed.
Large retailers Apple, H&M, Gap, Victoria Secrets, Target, Urban Outfitters are no longer and have come and gone. Majority of residents, including the very wealthy in the area, prefer smaller local businesses in the area. The mini-Target wasn’t ever busy because many residents felt it hurt local small businesses. Additionally there are 3-4 Targets within 4-5 miles of the area. So Target moving out was a non-issue.
There’s been constant protests against allowing large retailers into the area for decades. Unfortunately the large businesses in the area actually hurt the community and vibe over the last decade.
There were some small businesses that were looted or damaged during the rioting which was sad. I don’t condone the violence of BLM but it was a crack into deeper problems including stress caused by the pandemic closing down small businesses.
Minneapolis has not fully recovered from BLM but the bigger problem actually was due to the pandemic and many small businesses not being able to survive due to the lockdowns.
It will take few more years to recover but in the meantime, Minneapolis is significantly nicer and better, even right now, than most metropolitans I have lived in and visited.

1 reply

@hoopoo3721
4 hours ago (edited)
No good will ever come from doing evil ! I’m sure Satan is proud of them and will welcome them home.

@matthewhopkins9934
8 hours ago
No Sean all those people you listed as to blame for the riots are not responsible for the riots.
I notice in your long list of people to blame there was one giant group conspicuously absent.
At no point did you pin responsibility for the rioting on the rioters.
You talk as if these people have no choice but to do what the politicians, media and grifter organisations either tell them to do or condone and that’s BS.
Ultimately everyone is responsible for their own actions and all you did with this video is absolve those people of their actions.

@exaltedone2799
3 hours ago
Jokes on them, I don’t have to live there.

@brennanhearn6342
6 hours ago
I too prefer Popeye’s over Chikfila, for multiple reasons. One, it just tastes better, but more importantly…Chik is owned by horrible people.

@dianaelizondo2247
8 minutes ago
I rather build a store My Future in a city that cares , too bad walmart is wise to closed

@infinityg35maniac
4 hours ago
This reminds me of the fentanyl floyds graffiti getting struck by lightning in a clear day. Someone up top was not happy about all this worship over a felon
1

@aquatarkus2022
4 hours ago
Eliminate the root cause and everything will return to normalcy in 5 years.
1

@grbenway
1 hour ago
Typical jogger behavior, she still found a way to find someone else hair to sew into her scalp

@RezaQin
5 hours ago
I don’t want to live in a place that looks like the country in Elysium.

@jppalm3944
1 hour ago
Let them eat sneakers

@ashleyhenke5230
5 hours ago
HELp
America
great shows
,
1

@angiebervinkle1575
1 hour ago
Now target is gone now isn’t and Walmart gone never ever coming back so again how did it help

@EmekaTNwosu
5 hours ago
To be correct, it’s: Saint Floyd of Fentanyl

1 reply

@jeffrey7938
2 hours ago
LOL.

@TravisTennies
4 hours ago
Look how smart black people are!!!
2

@swolleneyes
5 hours ago
the gas station area is so utterly destroyed, the cars use the crosswalks instead of the road. that photo is so surreal it looks AI generated.

@Rexhunterj
44 minutes ago (edited)
Not sure how it is with the koreans in the USA but at 4:50 the gentlement there is speaking about something many white Australians feel towards the Chinese immigrants who are very much not spies of course. There may be some truth to his statement but of course I dont live there and cannot verify it.

@ValenHawk
5 hours ago
Karma

@almichaels6443
5 hours ago
People keep saying “Minneapolis riots” like St Paul doesn’t exist (offended)

@TheeLynnChase
6 hours ago
Perkins is a pancake house. This is from my home town. It’s heartbreaking what people did to this place. Ignorant beyond belief.

@woke2truth452
5 hours ago
Nail & beauty shop.. REALLY is that all you can do???

@punkeasy
5 hours ago
Somehow I doubt anyone who should, does not give two shits.

@angiebervinkle1575
1 hour ago
That’s on u if u don’t own anything

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in post = 27,570
Total words in transcript = 3,661
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB): (Available later)

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Sat, May 6, 2023 — Published post. Includes YouTube comments (3,539).

Way of the World – Twitter – Black Woman – Let the Power Go Back to the White People – Mar 13, 2023 – Transcript

admin — Mon, 13 Mar 2023 03:39:52 +0000

Way of the World

Twitter – Black Woman: Let the Power

Go Back to the White People

Mon, Mar 13, 2023

[A black woman (by the sound of her voice) talks sense about the “mess”, aka, death and destruction, that black rule has created in South Africa (and elsewhere in Africa)

– KATANA]

https://twitter.com/wayotworld/status/1634937993428615169

Published on Mon, Mar 13, 2023

Description

Way of the World
@wayotworld
After 28 years of failure in South Africa, this black woman now realises that, without white people running the government, her country has no future. Reminds me of the crowds of black farm workers cheering the return of white farmers in Zimbabwe.
2:11
46.2K views

12:22 AM · Mar 13, 2023
·
156.2K
Views
654
Retweets
91
Quote Tweets
2,336
Likes

_____________

TRANSCRIPT QUALITY = 5 Stars

NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment section. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(2:18 mins)

Black Woman: Let the power go back to the White people. We as black people, we just have to accept that we failed dismally! For 28 years we were given chance to prove ourselves and we failed dismally!

This thing of voting one black person after the other, it won’t help us with anything! Let power go back to White people. When White people were governing this country irrespective of whatever that they were doing, but our parents were working.

Kids used to get [word unclear] to go to universities. Towns used to be clean. There was jobs everywhere!

You apply, you get a job! Even if you didn’t have qualifications you could work in hotels, you could work wherever! You could work even in the farms. There were farms where people could work. Black people are a dismal, dismal failure!

They can’t govern. Let the power go back to White people. Let us just swallow our pride and give these White people power back so that the country can go back to normal.

We have to accept that we really, really respect people who fought for the liberation. We respect them and we were still going to respect them. But at the end of the day, we just have to take this power back to the White people.

We are tired! South Africa is a mess! Everywhere you go is a mess!

We are tired! We accept we failed! Black people cannot rule. Black people cannot govern.

White people should take over this country so that this country can have dignity back. All these things that are happening in our country, they will never happen again.

This problem of foreigners, this problem of crime, it won’t be there anymore! White people they don’t play. They don’t play, they rule, they govern!

The police, White police, they don’t play with criminals, they don’t play with undocumented people in the country.

END

top

============================================

Twitter Comments

top

Way of the World

@wayotworld
6h Replying to @wayotworld
It takes a lot of character to admit you were wrong, but unfortunately for everyone, she’s not going to get her wish – the genie can’t be put back in the bottle. Whites who are determined to stay in SA should be buying land and building sustainable and defendable communities.
12
21
432
13.3K
Mr_MaTtRoSiTy

@MaTtRoSiTy
8h Replying to @wayotworld
Respect for her for swallowing any pride and admitting failure. This is how you learn and move forward – by identifying failures and why/how they happened. But I feel she may be a minority and little progress will actually be made.
2
2
109
5,794
𝕵𝖆𝖘𝖔𝖓

@YT_Music_Review
4h Replying to @wayotworld
Sadly all of those white farmers they killed in the middle of the night to take their farms will never get justice
3
54
1,815
Nianello6

@nianello6
8h Replying to @wayotworld
“Black people are a dismal, dismal failure. They can’t govern.”
Sub-Saharan Africa really is still at the tribal/clan stage of development. It’s not a criticism, just an observation. Trying to graft a modern society/government onto that underlying structure will not work.
3
1
145
3,273
lukas (paperclip manufacturer)

@lukassian
6h Replying to @wayotworld
There’s something off with this accent. Could be fake.
4
1
2,875
David Pyper

@DavidPyper33
8h Replying to @wayotworld
In the 1980’s we sang “Free Nelson Mandela” and we encouraged the tribalism that consumed South Africa. Decades later, that country is collapsed, and some suggest the return of rule by whites. South Africa is a democracy, they can just vote for whites, right? Or is their racial… Show more
8
1
31
4,516
Show replies
Zanekstim

@zzanekk3
8h Replying to @wayotworld
Theres no place for whites in Africa,just stay in Europe,as everyone belongs to a continent. We need them here. Come back!
5
33
2,164
“Unhosted” Wallet Maxi

@CoatTrapper
6h Replying to @wayotworld
If I were white, from that area, I would never return to an ungrateful country where I was demonized for my skin color and because I was better at making safe societies.
I’d build an Orania, like those white folks did.
Good for them.
1
115
2,234
Serena Brown

@SerenaJB3
4h Replying to @wayotworld
It’s a tragedy for everyone who lives there.
1
29
763
Andrew Jackson

@July071832
6h Replying to @wayotworld
somehow, prosperity and civilization requires white people.
1
26
1,685
blueberries

@blueber46479831
4h Replying to @wayotworld
Incredibly insightful. If only the majority of them felt this way. It makes you wonder if it weren’t for the lying fake news media, if this could be possible
1
471
Greyed_out

@OutGreyed
8h Replying to @wayotworld
This looks like it’s filmed in UK. Not sure about this one tbf
4
1
3,086
Joshua Hogarth

@JoshuaHogarth1
7h Replying to @wayotworld
They’ll make the big mistake of bringing in the Chinese or worse.
34
1,984
ThoughtCriminal

@dravynst
7h Replying to @wayotworld
Believe it or not, a ton of black people in south africa feel this way. African blacks are an entirely different breed than american blacks. I am not saying they are all like this woman, but a lot of them are.
2
1
43
994
Ian

@ianscooper
6h Replying to @wayotworld
This is a very powerful statement by this lady… Colonial rule wasn’t always positive, however tell me of one African or Caribbean country where the transition has improved the lives of the many; Zimbabwe, South Africa and Jamaica etc?
3
1
10
1,289
Dj King Arthur/Canada

@DjKingArthurCa1
6h Replying to @wayotworld
Seems some African countries have a good track record. Ghana, Kenya, Gambia, etc. Why not look to the good examples.
4
2
1,539
nognverra

@nognverra
8h Replying to @wayotworld
Europeans should get back in power… in Europe.
2
2
158
5,336
Jon Murray

@TheJonMurray51
7h Replying to @wayotworld
and

@ramzpaul
Reality is undefeated.
Gerardo Esteves

@GerardoEsteves9
6h Replying to @wayotworld
She is mistaken on that last bit
1
1,212
RR

@rwt737
6h Replying to @wayotworld
Wakanda for….oh no, wait!
4
1,745
Dave B

@Aekos31
5h Replying to @wayotworld
Mam, I am here to help the people.
821
1&Done

@tweeet2tweet
6h Replying to @wayotworld
Sad to hear this.
2
1,138
No.

@No17485973
1h Replying to @wayotworld
Communism doesn’t work anywhere. Never.
1
56
Ron

@spryrdfarm
3h Replying to @wayotworld
That Bono guy is no where to be seen or heard from
152

@TattooEvryThing
7h Replying to @wayotworld

@AnthonyCumia

@CompoundBoss

@TheCumiaShow
chum for tomorrow’s show
1,324
Roman Kandle

@hubcap617
4h Replying to @wayotworld
Powerful thoughts
465
Deena Keys

@DeenaKeys
4h Replying to @wayotworld
Yes. It’s true. Says a lot about our race.
277
Veritas

@Veritas_deu
28m Replying to @wayotworld
and

@JackSpagnola
You know what she put that better than a lot of people!
23
Adjutor de Vernon

@AdjutorV
8h Replying to @wayotworld
Smart’s farm yeilds fruits after their return.
youtube.com
Zimbabwe farm yields fruit after return of Smart family | DW English
After Emmerson Mnangagwa ousted Robert Mugabe from power, Robert Smart and his family returned to the lands they had been forced from last year. The news cam…
2
19
3,066
Trolling101

@Trolling9696
5h Replying to @wayotworld
Finally granted we can’t see her skin color but assuming she’s black… I’m glad she said it. A smart one has arisen from the ashes!
GIF
ALT
2
436
Dad

@Jean_Tanlelou
29m Replying to @wayotworld
Don’t forget, wakanda is for ever.
16
LoneWolf907

@LoneWolf907
3h Replying to @wayotworld
No, what you need is competent politicians, irrespective of race, who will govern in a manner that is best for the entire country, not just for certain groups. Please do that and set a good example for Europe, New Zealand, Australia, and America.
99
Big Zukk

@kubatism
6h Replying to @wayotworld
It’s been 28 years already? God I miss S.A. from my youth.
1
4
1,299
I.L.

@leglos24
6h Replying to @wayotworld
This is an interesting take. While I’m sure she’s not the only one frustrated with the state of things in SA, I doubt most people there share her opinion. Antiwhite attitudes are quite prevalent in SA.
1
1
913
LNCVNC

@LNCVNC1
8h Replying to @wayotworld
Probably true, but almost definitely fake.
2
3
2,480
Nagy István

@trispora
5h Replying to @wayotworld
Negroes in the US could also include in their prayers the names of the white people who support them. But they would rather ask for money to compensate them for their slave past. Which, let’s face it, was the equivalent of winning the lottery.
5
238
Gareth Davies

@GarethDavies007
7h Replying to @wayotworld
Silly woman only has to look at Zimbabwe
They are pleading for white farmers to go back and save their country
2
27
807
LexOrandi

@Lexvevindi
8h Replying to @wayotworld
Haiti before the slave revolution; Detroit, Michigan; Oakland, California…..
She’s not wrong….
2
66
2,448
𝙱𝚊𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚋𝚢 𝚆𝚒𝚕𝚍𝚎

@TheBarnabyWilde
13m Replying to @wayotworld
‘Black’ pilled.
5
Jimmy

@JakeTheShake69
3h Replying to @wayotworld

@chatGPT
397
Bruce A. Prokopets

@bruceprokopets
5h Replying to @wayotworld

@JLPtalk
1,306
Royero.hodl

@Royero5
1h Replying to @wayotworld
93
Zhāng wei

@Zhngwei2
1h Replying to @wayotworld
Join

@VickyMo74553996
ongoing class to learn how to make minimum of a thousand dollar daily
27
Ol Blue Shoes Willy

@GoodOlBlue
6h Replying to @wayotworld

@dandakich
321
I_am_a_rich_one

@IAmARichOne
3h Replying to @wayotworld
Didn’t Monty Python point this out some 40 years ago?
48
JoCo

@qetah1
6h Replying to @wayotworld
Nonsense!
255
immortal italiano

@GinoSuperhero
8h Replying to @wayotworld

@IGGYAZALEA
1,087
Cole

@Colleen25346029
3h Replying to @wayotworld
white people just had more contacts and resources, I would think, that provided progress but also fed different cultures, I guess? Africa wanted more for their people, not white immigrants like? what caused this?
63
Thy Raven Wings

@ThyRavenWings_
11m Replying to @wayotworld
They had their chance with us. Now? Don’t exactly hear of people lining up in droves to move to Africa anymore now do you?
1
7
David Miller

@DavidM31970
3h Replying to @wayotworld
No way,let it be a model and it isn’t there yet.
61
rockveta

@rockveta1
5h Replying to @wayotworld
sounds made up
109
Danyellsabells

@danyellsabells
7h Replying to @wayotworld
I just feel terribly sorry about the world as a whole. Each country is suffering something, the 1% at the top have caused so much division, their plan to create chaos so they can bring about order. It’s time to harmonise our differences to create a new healing human symphony .
332
Napoleon Bonaparte

@Napoleon15869
2h Replying to @wayotworld
It appears that democracy must go in South Africa to realize this woman’s vision. I don’t know how easy it would be to stage a coup there, but plenty of people would know. The boss here would know. Vive l’Afrique du Sud.
23
Dylan ★★★★☆

@DylanDelargee
5h Replying to @wayotworld

@EllDonne
110
Adam

@jiggumoe
4h Replying to @wayotworld
Update the list of countries that failed when honky left
Gstein

@opgalvanic
6h Replying to @wayotworld
SA looks worse than LA…
1
204
🅉

@nukeisraelnow
4h Replying to @wayotworld
Doubt modern Whites even have the fortitude to rule over non-Whites rather than grovel and self-abase
1
45
MichaelBunchofNumbers

@Michael72561665
4h Replying to @wayotworld
We waz kingz
2
110
KiwiHatesTwatter

@HatesKiwi
5h Replying to @wayotworld
This is where it’s ok to be racist. Accept the fact that “white” people are good at systems, order, running shit. They are great at establishing and enforcing rules. It’s ok to be racist. The denial of any difference has thrown SA into hell.
1
100
Frank Booth

@RobertW50349289
7h Replying to @wayotworld
The end to apartheid & gaining civil rights was important, but responsible governance should be based on merit & competence, not tribal solidarity. Black Africans can & should have positions of power but not just because they’re black, but because they’ve joined modernity.
1
1
341
Russ Shackleford

@beakforce1
5h Replying to @wayotworld
Nah. I don’t think white people need to babysit you anymore. Time to grow up and leave the nest. Sink or swim.
5
163
DH

@dh333rd
3h Replying to @wayotworld
She’s right and wrong. White people used to govern well but when you look at what we’re doing now in the west we’re doing things she doesn’t want, e.g. undocumented people being allowed in.
27
Make Globalism Great Again!

@BillCor26578964
7h Replying to @wayotworld
As an aggregate I think there’s too large a black underclass to maintain a highly functioning polity.I think it’s largely biological too.Selective evolution is not functional,not sure how this can be remedied in light of woke leftism either.
2
512
Greg Wicker

@percolatorfish
7h Replying to @wayotworld
how about no. they chopped some of us up and now they can eat dust.
2
2
302
Pedro Gomes

@gpstr0
8h Replying to @wayotworld
LMAO, enjoy the collapse, blacky
1
29
2,434
Fafiyalatha

@fafiyalatha
1h Replying to @wayotworld
She’s dropping truth bombs like there’s no tomorrow
8
Natural Born Male

@UnVaxxxxed
3h Replying to @wayotworld
I think the Chinese will be the next governing entity in Africa … Feels bad man
47
Marsoff9898

@marsoff9898
7h Replying to @wayotworld
No Non white will miss the jews in any way.
175
Магнум

@Magnumforce911
2h Replying to @wayotworld
wondering why… ahahaha, what a bunch of clowns
13
Danny

@FloriduhManDan
1h Replying to @wayotworld
White people are terrible. They should all leave S. Africa asap and let black people there live in peace and harmony.
10
InfoScape

@InfoScape_Chat
2h Replying to @wayotworld
South Africa might be the first to realize the effect IQ and cultural stability has on a nation
1
29
Scipio Hadronicus

@ScipioHadronic
1h Replying to @wayotworld
Unfortunately, Whites are not serious people anymore either.
4
Vaughn Trapp

@vaughn_trapp
4h Replying to @wayotworld
Wow.
“Black people are a dismal, dismal failure…They can’t govern. Let the power go back to white people. White people don’t “Play”…They rule, they Govern”
Where’s the lie?
32
TealD90

@D90Teal
40m Replying to @wayotworld
The problem is the African men, way to jealous, corrupt, like to flaunt wealth, get upset when the women lead, and violent when their perceived authority is threatened.
Nicolasz Keizer

@keizernicolasz
6h Replying to @wayotworld
Let them rot in their own mess
47
PandaA

@Panda_Banned
6h Replying to @wayotworld
sorry hun but most white people who have their head in check are leaving Europe and moving to New Zealand or Latin America because caveman mentality is ruining civilisation. Nature is just washing out the inferior people. Start a community on the fringe of your broken world
74
Michael Leovinus

@Michaelallalone
6h Replying to @wayotworld
The real question is; why would anyone want people in their society who are inherently harmful and detrimental to it? Those people would be literal parasites; producing nothing, improving nothing, just consuming and reproducing without thought.
87
Fisherman/them?

@Fish3rman66
7h Replying to @wayotworld
Tough,mugabe told them to slaughter the ‘evil whiteys’ and claim back their farmland,they did and because their NOT farmers and haven’t got a clue about farming they will now suffer the consequences……not our problem!!
2
143
Gary Colburn

@GaryColburn12
4h Replying to @wayotworld
Negroes have never created anything worthwhile, let alone a civilization. The whites in South Africa should leave, a terrible fate awaits them otherwise.
34
the demagogue

@thedemagogue1
2h Replying to @wayotworld
i remember watching a documentary about the special police like swat/commandos in south Africa it took place after the black rule and every time they caught someone ie about to rob a bank or that kidnap a child the judge with let then walk free everytime
youtube.com
South African Special Task Force – Episode 1 # 3
Episode 1 # 3 – Please note that this depicts the early 90’s and as such is not relevant today any more.
12
Boom Shakalaka

@BoomSha60236653
4h Replying to @wayotworld
I promise you this has nothing to do with white people. It’s useless low IQ lefties of all shapes colors and sizes vs much smarter God fearing republican/conservative governments.
23
Bosch

@Boschcomp
1h Replying to @wayotworld
The Afrikaners are very attached to their land, so they wont leave. But I would like to see all whites move to countries where they are safe and respected. Let South Africa rot and descend into chaos.
15
Chief Joseph

@ay28955782
4h Replying to @wayotworld
It’s not a black failure, it’s a white western progressive failure. Without the gae and their plans to destroy the planet, many many country’s would still be intact and prospering. Racial divide IS the tactic of white progressive leftists.
22
leonardo Abisso

@leonardoabismo
6h Replying to @wayotworld
white people should avoid Africa like the plague. They will always find a way to blame on the whites.
53
Randy Mathews

@RandyMa41478953
4h Replying to @wayotworld
and

@ramzpaul
When blacks rule, everything turns to ….(see any black ruled city)
42
Silver Mooncrab

@SilverMoonCrab1
7h Replying to @wayotworld
LOL a black white supremacist.
2
94
mo sort

@mo_sort
4h Replying to @wayotworld
Hey

@DieAntwoord
Why don’t you make some dangerous art again? Why don’t you tell the real story about Nelson Mandella, the murderous scum, your hero? Why not cover what this women is talking about? Because you’re cowards. Rich kid cowards. Don’t worry, us real ones will do it.
22
13
1
35
2,473
Henry… our world needs a lot of

@Henrysmithob
7h Replying to @wayotworld
Very flattering Mam and thank you..but I don’t think white people are interested! Seriously.
82
Memes Are Weapons!

@SteveSibbet
7h Replying to @wayotworld
3
108
Memes Are Weapons!

@SteveSibbet
7h Replying to @wayotworld
2
100
reginald denny

@kibapuppycat
8h Replying to @wayotworld
GIF
ALT
1
134
mo sort

@mo_sort
4h Replying to @wayotworld
RACIST BITCH!
23
GIGITY

@GIGITY34327699
4h Replying to @wayotworld
and

@ramzpaul
Fuck them they can starve to death
33
travel schmavel

@schmavel
8h Replying to @wayotworld
the problem is blacks are really stupid. esp in America. For some reason they seem to think they invented everything and built everything here. Which is fucking crazy. Idk if they’d ever admit to the fact that they destroyed everything whites built in america.
1
119

==========================

PDF Download

top

Total words in post = 3,048
Total words in transcript = 321
Total images = xx
Total A4 pages = xxx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB): (Available later)

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Mon, Mar 13, 2023 — Published post.

VertigoPolitix Collection – On the Ethnic Genetic Interests of Europeans – Jul 5, 2020 – Transcript

admin — Thu, 28 Jul 2022 12:00:30 +0000

[In this 13 minute video VertigoPolitix discusses Frank Salter’s article in a peer reviewed journal titled “Estimating Ethnic Genetic Interests – Is it Adaptive to Resist Replacement Migration?” Salter answers, obviously, yes, and gives his sound reasons.

Although not discussed, I would make the following observations.

Organized jewry, the true “deep state” behind the curtain and facade of “democracy“, are carrying this genocide out primarily through mass non-White invasion (labeled as “migration”) but also through the promotion of feminism, miscegenation, abortion, homosexuality, gender dysphoria, etc.

In addition, to facilitate the effects of such dysgenic factors, Organized jewry has subjected Whites to — over generations now — psychological warfare, through their control over the media, education, etc., to induce White guilt and self-hate.

The ultimate aim of these programs is to bring about a Jew World Order ruling over former White countries, that will have been turned into multi-racial brown skinned, dysfunctional societies, no longer able to resist jewish tyranny.

— KATANA]

NOTE: This video is longer available at the VertigoPolitix channel, but is available at the YouTube channel below.

VertigoPolitix

On the Ethnic Genetic Interests of Europeans

Jul 5, 2020

Click here for the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuUAa9q4ptE

Re-published on Jul 5, 2020 by:

VertigoPolitix Collection

YouTube Description

VertigoPolitix – On the Ethnic Genetic Interests of Europeans

1,021 views

Jul 5, 2020

VertigoPolitix Collection

4.01K subscribers

Comments

TRANSCRIPT

(13:55 mins)

Racially conscious Whites are often frustrated that people of European descent do not understand a simple fact that others take for granted. That it is normal for an ethnic group, or race, to want to survive and to avoid displacement by others. Unlike people of other races Whites seem to demand some kind of objective, rather than subjective, reason for survival.

Activists have long hoped a respected academic would offer an objective, scientific justification, for the defense by Whites of their own ethno-racial interests. One such academic publication however was written almost two decades ago.

Dr Frank Salter of the Max Planck Society published in a peer-reviewed journal called Population and Environment, in volume 24, number to, November 2002, a tour de force article entitled Estimating Ethnic Genetic Interests – Is it Adaptive to Resist Replacement Migration? And it is the single most important intellectual contribution to ethno-racial studies available today.

Mainstream discussions about immigration usually consider only secondary questions such as economics, crime, culture, etc. They ignore the ultimate interest of a people, genetic continuity. Which is the focus of Dr Salter’s paper.

In the very first sentence he asks the central question:

“Does ethnic competition over territory pay off in terms of reproductive fitness.”

From an evolutionary standpoint fitness means reproductive fitness, or the propagation of distinctive genes from one generation to the next. Living organisms can be seen as the vehicles by which this propagation occurs. Thus as Dr Salter explains, adaptive behavior maintains, or increases the frequency of one’s distinctive genes in the population. Family, or kin, share many of the same distinctive genes. So a person’s fitness is increased by the survival and reproductive success of his kin.

This is also true for ethnic groups, or ethnies, which is the term Dr Salter prefers. Like families ethnic have more distinctive genes in common with each other than they do with other populations. The same can be said of members of the same race. Although the genetic kinship of ethnic members is more diluted than that of family members, ethnies are large reservoirs of genetic interests for the members therefore just as a person has a great genetic interest in the well-being of his family, so does a German have for Germans, an Italian for Italians, etc.

In this sense it can be as adaptive to support one’s ethno-racial group, as to support one’s family. A defined territory is crucial for the survival of ethnony according to Dr Salter. The special quality of a defended territory is that it insulates a population from the vicissitudes of demographic disturbance. Acquisition and defensive territory are therefore an integral part of the tribal strategy of humans.

The passionate relationship between a people and it’s homeland has been constant throughout history. And as Dr Salter points out a people can suffer many setbacks, but as long as it retains it’s own territorial space, it can recover.

In the long run only territory ensures survival. And human history is largely a record of groups expanding and contracting, conquering, or being conquered, migrating, or being displaced by migrants. The loss of territory whether by military defeat, or displacement by alien groups, brings ethnic diminishment, or destruction. Precisely what is happening in the multicultural West today.

A large part of Dr Salter’s work in this paper is a quantitative analysis of this negative genetic impact. The analysis is based on two concepts. Carrying capacity and genetic kinship. Carrying capacity is the maximum population that can live in a given territory. Although technology and increased economic efficiency can increase carrying capacity there is a practical limit above which further population growth is simply not possible.

Many ecologists believe we are approaching, or have surpassed the practical carrying capacity of the earth. Even if these ecologists are wrong about the earth as a whole, it is clear that carrying capacity has already been exceeded in those areas where overpopulation has badly damaged the environment, or depleted natural resources.

Immigration undermines the interests of native populations, even if their territory has not reached it’s carrying capacity. For example, the carrying capacity of the United States is probably significantly greater than it’s current population.

However, one day it’s carrying capacity will be reached. And if at that point part of the country is filled with the descendants of today’s immigrants, heritage Americans will have no room into which they can expand. In other words, even if the carrying capacity of the US is as high as 600 million, or more, if that population figure is ever reached, some portion will be the descendants of genetically alien immigrants.

The presence of millions of non-Whites will make the parts of the US they occupy unavailable to Whites. And we may reach this carrying capacity sooner than later, as America, as is the rest of the globe is a closed system.

Dr Salter notes that immigrants can change the caring capacity of their new nation. Intelligent, hard-working immigrants, could in theory raise the carrying capacity by increasing the efficiency at which resources are used, or incompetent immigrants can drain on resources and lower the carrying capacity. Obviously the latter is occurring in all countries in the West.

The other concept central to Dr Salter’s paper is genetic kinship. Even though all humans share many genes, kinship is a measure of the genetic similarities and differences above and beyond this general gene sharing. It measures the relative frequencies of ethnically distinctive genes. Kinship values can be either positive, or negative.

If individuals, or groups share more genes than is typical of a population then the kinship is positive. If they share fewer genes than average kinship is negative.

Genetic kinship can be mathematically derived from studies of the genetic variation, or distance between populations.

The genetic data that form the basis of Dr Salter’s quantitative analysis are from the work of Luigi Luca Cavalli Sforza’s 1994 book, The History And Geography Of Human Genes, which examine the frequencies of genetic variations in a broad range of human populations. In general the data are sound. And they can be used to measure the extent of the damage alien immigration does to the genetic interests of native populations.

It is important to note that Dr Salter treats the arrival of immigrants not as a simple addition to the population. But as a one-for-one displacement of natives. This is methodologically correct, because when a nation reaches it’s carrying capacity it is the presence of immigrants and their descendants that make it impossible for natives to increase their numbers.

What may not appear to be one for one displacement today, will, in retrospect, be seen to be precisely that in future.

Dr Salter expresses the loss of genetic ethnic interest in units, he calls “child equivalence”. In other words, for any given member of the native population, what is the number of lost children that would equal the loss of his ethnic genetic interests caused by the arrival of a certain number of aliens.

Note that we are not talking about actual children. But the gene equivalents put into the form of a genetic parent-child relationship.

Put differently the arrival of immigrants from other ethnics will change the genetic character of a population and make it more alien to every member of the native ethny. The amount of genetic change from the point of view of any given member of the native ethny can be calculated as the equivalent of the number of children not born to that person.

An example will make this clearer. Dr Salter begins by considering the English as the native population and examines the effects of the immigration of ten thousand Danes an ethny that is genetically very close to the English. Replacing ten thousand Englishmen with ten thousand Danes, changes the genetic characteristics of the population so much that the resulting post-displacement population differs from the undisturbed population by the equivalent of an Englishman, or woman, not having had 167 children. Again we are not talking about actual children, but of the genetic equivalent.

Let us consider another example. What if the immigrants were Bantus, a population very genetically distant from the English, rather than Danes. Here the genetic cost to any given Englishman of the arrival of ten thousand Bantu’s, is the equivalent of ten thousand eight hundred and fifty four lost children.

Clearly the extent of the genetic transformation of a population depends on the genetic distance between the native and immigrant populations. And what if the level of immigration were larger, and more in keeping with the massive displacement of Western peoples we see today?

The English population is roughly 50 million. If 12 and a half million were replaced by an equal number of Danes, the genetic loss to the English would be the equivalent of 209,000 children not born. If the immigrants were from India, the loss would be 2.6 million children. If the immigrants were sub-Saharan African, 14 million.

These figures are not guesses, or estimates. They are objective mathematical results based on genetic data accepted by the scientific community. And you can be assured that the top brass in the liberal intellectual elite understand all of this!

While plunging birth rates may be genetically damaging for European derived peoples, the replacement by genetically alien immigrants is far worse. A falling birth rate reduces the population, but does not transform it genetically. And a future increase in birth rates can always make up for the loss.

Once immigrants have established themselves in a native territory their genes are a permanent addition. From the standpoint of genetic ethnic interest the idea that immigration makes up for low native birth rates is pathological.

And why does immigration cause such large genetic loss? Dr Salter writes, random members of an ethnic group are concentrated stores of each other’s distinctive genes, just as children and cousins are concentrated stores, some ethnies are so differently genetically that they amount to a large negative store of those distinctive genes.

Also migration has a double impact on fitness. First by reducing the potential ceiling of the native population. And secondly by replacing those lost individuals familiar genes with exotic varieties.

Dr Salter also stresses that this loss is not somehow reduced by being spread over the entire native population. The loss in terms of genetic equivalence reflects the change of population from the point of view of every member of that native populous.

It is well understood that within group charity is potentially adaptive, because it encourages the survival of kindred genes. Dr Salter explains that the self-sacrificial heroism that preserves one group genetic interest, is also a form of adaptation.

For example, Dr Salter points out that an act of charity, or heroism performed by an Englishman that prevented ten thousand Danes from replacing ten thousand Englishmen, would be worthwhile genetically, even if the Englishman sacrificed his life, and with it the potential of having up to 167 children.

Preventing replacement by Bantu’s would justify an even larger sacrifice, given the greater potential loss of genetic interest.

It is clear then that pro-White activism intended to avoid displacement is normal and adaptive, and justified by rational analysis. It is multicultural surrender that is pathological. As all peoples in all periods of history have instinctively known. Men have not had to be taught to die for their countries. The preservation of their land and people has been more important to them than life itself.

Dr Salter further observes that White Americans have, in the name of multiculturalism, engaged in a unilateral withdrawal from ethnic competition, with devastating results for their genetic interests.

The majority also suffer from minority free-riding of two kinds. Minorities that cluster at the bottom of the social scale form an underclass that increases it’s reproductive fitness by absorbing resources and welfare from the majority, making the majority pay for it’s own genetic dispossession, and loss of fitness. At the same time more competitive minorities can manipulate public policy in their ethnic favor, against the interests of the majority.

Dr Salter’s paper can be summarized as follows. Ethnies and races are large reservoirs of genetic interest for group members. Ethnic genetic interests are real and vitally important. Genetic kinship can be calculated and the harm to any persons, or groups ethnic genetic interests resulting from alien immigration can be quantified. Immigration of even closely related groups has a negative impact on genetic interests. And this detrimental influence increases rapidly with a greater genetic distance.

Putting this detrimental impact in the form of child equivalence is a particularly powerful way of demonstrating these effects. If people of European descent understood that every non-White face they see is diminishing their personal and group interests, they might begin to understand that they are being ill-served at a fundamental genetic level by non-European immigration, and the ideology of multiculturalism.

Dr Salter’s paper stands as an objective, scientifically, sound justification for the active pursuit of ethnic and racial interests. Liberals cannot deny the facts discussed here, nor can they deny that they point to the necessity of European ethno-racial nationalism. The formation of ethnic-based national states is the most efficient way of safeguarding ethnic genetic interest.

Closing off the safety valve of Third World immigration to the West should be as attractive to the sincere Left as to the racial Right.

Dr Salter’s works must be widely disseminated among thinking Whites. For the survival of our people will eventually depend on such scientific narratives.

[13:55]

END

============================================

PDF Notes

* Total words in post = 2,655

* Total words in transcript = 2,272

* Total images = 5

* Total A4 pages = xx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

Version History

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Jul 28, 2022 — Published post.

Morgoth’s Review – Paradise Lost and the Birth of the Left – Nov 12, 2021 — Transcript

admin — Fri, 12 Nov 2021 12:41:49 +0000

[Morgoth discusses the parallels between modern liberalism, the Left, with its focus on rationalising freedom from innate morality and nature, and Milton’s Paradise Lost, an epic poem that tells the story of Lucifer’s rebellion in heaven and the becoming of Satan.

— KATANA]

Morgoth’s Review

Paradise Lost and

the Birth of the Left

Nov 12, 2021

Click here for the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDU4tkSuclo

Published on Nov 12, 2021

YouTube Description

Morgoth’s Review

Paradise Lost And The Birth Of The Left

8,025 views

Nov 12, 2021

SAVE

Morgoth’s Review

45K subscribers

The audio book mentioned:

https://youtu.be/GINzUBvQ5nw

Buy me a pint here:

https://www.subscribestar.com/morgoth…

https://www.patreon.com/Morgoth

Buy me a coffee

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/morgoth

Bitchute

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/morg…

Thanks to Theberton for the intros and outros

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_0K…

394 Comments

Thanks to Theberton for the intros and outros

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_0K…

TRANSCRIPT

(31:45mins)

[00:00]

[Intro music and imagery by Theberton.]

[00:34]

Well, hello again there folks.

So I recently saw this post going around by a Left-wing activist. And I thought it says so much. And I was just thinking, how did we arrive here? How did we arrive in these mountains of madness? How did it come that we are now staring straight into the abyss, here? And they have brought us here as well. And I’m not going to leave this up on the screen for too long, because it makes me feel sick!

But let’s just like have a look at what he said here. And we’ll try and answer the question of how we got here:

“Because I’ve got a bunch of angry Right-wing reactionaries saying being a pedophile is wrong and not natural. I’m simply asking they back up their claims. Thus far, not a single one can.”

And so he’s asking for a peer-reviewed study as to why paedophilia is unnatural. Now the first thing here, like let’s just dispense with the sophistry. He’s neglected any kind of moral framework. He’s making an appeal to science. Like a scientific study as to why paedophilia is wrong, because he knows morally speaking he doesn’t have a leg to stand on. And, in fact, he wouldn’t even accept that there is such a thing as morality, because he’s a pure materialist. And this is kind of like where we are. This is where they’ve brought us.

I mean, on other issues, of course, which are more close to their heart, they are the most hyper moral people you will ever come across! But when it’s about being degenerate, when it’s about sending civilization into darkness and into hell, you’ll find all of a sudden they make an appeal to “scientific realism” and even here, he’s wrong.

Because the simple fact is, and this is why I don’t like this subject. But the simple fact is children can’t breed. And it’s not healthy for them to have sex. There’s reasons why we have these blocks. There’s reasons why civilizations set these things up.

But what I think’s very interesting to explore is why the Left don’t seem to have any kind of moral framework. And leaving aside the hypocrisy. Leaving aside that on other issues they are the most hyper-moral clique that you could ever come across. Let’s just take this on face value, because it is, in my view, the driving force of their entire world view, their entire ideology.

So I’ve recently been reading Paradise Lost, John Milton’s great epic poem. And so Paradise Lost is, by the way, there’s also an amazing audiobook on YouTube where the Emperor from Star Wars, Ian McDiarmid, does the role of the devil.

Because, if you are not very familiar with Paradise Lost – I’m sure many people have heard of it – it’s an epic poem that tells the story of Lucifer’s rebellion in heaven. And then the war in heaven and how he and his lieutenants and around about a third of all of the angels in heaven were thrown out! They were defeated and mauled, and thrown out of heaven, to cast down into the abyss!

And one of the things that really jumps out at you is the character of Satan. Which over the centuries – it was written in 1690, I think, so just kind of beyond before the onset of the Enlightenment. And one of the things that jumps out at you when you’re reading Paradise Lost is Satan. And, as I said, been controversial over the years how Milton depicted him. And there’s a lot of discussion around it.

But Satan, in Paradise Lost, he isn’t just kind of this seething demon that wants to roast people over a fire, and do all of these depraved and horrible acts! Satan, you could almost call him an “anti-hero”, or some people would even say the “hero” of Paradise Lost. Which is why there’s so much sort of discussion about it.

[05:02]

But he’s very charismatic. And he’s a leader of his rogue captains. People like Belial, and Moloch, and Mammon. He’s also prone to making these big, very articulate, grandstanding, speeches in front of his minions, and raging against God. And this, I think, touches on something quite profound. Because you have to ask yourself what is Satan’s main problem here? What is his main bone of contention with God?

And what he has a problem with, beginning right from the start, in heaven is the authoritarian nature of heaven and God. Satan questions how it can be good if they aren’t free. He will say like:

“Why is it that we are in this perfect God-created heaven? And yet we don’t even have individual freedom! We don’t have liberty!”

We live under what he calls “the tyranny of heaven”. And so from Satan’s perspective, and he says it throughout all of the speeches that he makes:

“God is something of a tyrant! God is like the big daddy who you need to have liberty from! You can’t express yourself under the tyranny of heaven! Under the authoritarianism of God!”

And so what we find is that Satan is actually a man of the intellect. Which is how it kind of segues into the Enlightenment, which of which was coming at that time.

Because then what you can do is replace that with God, with the King, or with religion in general. God is a religion, or even the state. You’ll see these things kind of repeating again, and again. And they become this oppressive force which you need to be liberated from.

And, in my opinion, this is the essence of the Left. This is where the Left is “birthed”, if you like, in this idea of all things being oppressive. Because today when we think of the Woke Left. And then some of it just seems downright ridiculous.

But there’s a clear line there which goes all the way back to when we were much more religious. And an example of that would be something like the French Revolution. So in the French Revolution, the reason we have a Right and the Left is because the revolutionaries of the Left wanted to destroy the old order, the traditional order, which was the peasant to the aristocracy to the King and then up towards God, and the great chain of being.

They wanted to annihilate all of that, because they thought that it was oppressive. And then in the National Assembly, after the French Revolution, the Left, the revolutionaries sat on the Left side of the chamber, and the Right representing, defending tradition, sat on the Right side, the conservative side. But it would be genuinely conservative.

And this is how we got the Left and the Right.

And when you look at some of the thinkers of the time, you look at some people like Rousseau, where:

“Man is born free, but everywhere he’s in chains!”

It kind of brings back again Satan’s speeches in Paradise Lost. Except this time it’s the King and the Church, which is the oppressive force.

And so once you’ve abolished the, let’s say, the heavenly order, the great chain of being, of God, to King, the traditional order, the question then comes, … Because then at least you had a set morality. The morality which everybody understood and everybody obeyed.

And so then the question becomes that if you are going to marginalize this, if you are going to brush all of, … I mean. In the case of the French Revolution, which is completely annihilated! And you’ll see again the religious were persecuted. The Royal Family was executed.

But then the problem that arises from that, is how then do you arrive at laws? Like, where do you see your morality come from? And, of course, this is an Enlightenment thing, where we will use our own reason. So man will decide that! Our laws and our, … And then you get “Rights”, you get “Constitutions”. And you get all of this talk of “Liberty” enshrining Rights, and all of this. But it’s all man-made, because now God has been brushed off to the side. The old order has been brushed off to the side.

[10:00]

And so in place of having an objective morality, you’ve got man-made laws, and mad made constitutions, and politics. And so this is essentially what the French Revolution, to pick one example. The big one in my view.

This is actually what the revolutionaries ushered in. And to go back to Paradise Lost, you can see that in Satan’s speeches, it’s literally mirrored in this! Because Satan revolted and rebelled against God. And when he’s down in heaven having a like a conference with his lieutenants, the question then arises about what to do next, and how to frame things. And Satan is typically of the Enlightenment. He’s a man of intellect! And he says that he rationalizes all of this in a way which he can say, the famous line being:

“It’s better to reign in hell, than serve in heaven.”

So basically he comes to the conclusion that it doesn’t really matter, because he can create a mirror version of heaven, in hell. And:

“What is good to God, evil will be to him!”

And it’s this kind of relativistic mindset that he’s got. Which is like, this will all work itself out and one isn’t really any better than the other. It doesn’t make any difference.

So this is his version of bringing in these laws, and you brushed aside the “absolute”. And you will just do it yourself using “pure intellect”, about how you look at the world. And so Satan in Paradise Lost is a “liberal”! [chuckling] It seems paradoxical, and it seems strange, but he is a liberal. What he’s rejecting is “authoritarianism”, and what he’s driving towards is the intellect of the individual, and being free to express that in any way that he can.

So when people say the Left have become something “satanic”, what I want to explore here is the idea that it always was! Because people will say:

“Well, they were just a bunch of socialists, but in more recent years it became corrupted, and it became something toxic, and insane, and satanic!”

In actual fact, if you traced back the Leftist thinking, Leftist thought, all the way back to its origins in somewhere like the French Revolution, I think it’s been satanic from day one. Because it kind of corresponds perfectly with the story of Paradise Lost.

It’s this idea that there can be no authority over you, and you must then enshrine all of these laws which, basically, you’ve just made up yourself! They’re just purely man made.

I mean, even in the case of something like socialism, the end goal of socialism is supposed to be the liberation of the masses from capitalism. They’re actually on some firmer ground there, because it brings in the question of whether, or not, capitalism is itself a legitimately Right-wing force. But that’s another subject.

The end goal in the socialist utopia, which you see them talking about now, “luxury space communism”, it is that the individual has been liberated from work. They’ve been liberated from all of these institutions, and structures of capitalism. And so they are then finally set loose into the world to express themselves as they see fit.

Again there’s another paradox here, because they also think that everybody is just formed by their environment. So if you’re then gonna change the environment, you’ll change the person. But if you’re going to liberate them, completely liberate humanity, to do what they want, and they no longer have any higher power over them, or any kind of structures sort of moulding them, then what is it that you’re actually going to set loose? Because there’s not really any essence there! It’s just a void, if it can just be moulded by society. But so I don’t see how that makes any sense very much either.

And you see in the Russian Revolution, once again, which is also from the Left. Again it’s this rebellion against the old order. It’s a rebellion against God. Again the religious institutions were annihilated.

And once again you have all of these horrible laws coming in, and which are purely man-made, and not rooted in any kind of like sort of metaphysics at all. And you’ll see that straight away. It’s a tyranny, because of what they have to deal with. Because they’re trying to figure all this out as it goes along and it ends up in a bloodbath and a tyranny, over, and over, again! Because all they have to rely on is the intellect, is the human. And they can kind of just make stuff up on the fly, and change the rules willy-nilly, because they’ve rejected an absolute morality.

[15:22]

I mean, an interesting thing, and I already know what many people in the comments are going to be thinking, is that when we look at the revolutions, the Russian Revolution in particular. Also the French Revolution, and even the American Revolution. Which again, is all about liberty from the old tradition. Liberty from, freedom from, the old order. And look how America has turned out. America is what people think of as being the greatest satanic force in the world today!

But nevertheless what you see in all of these things is this idea that it’s “top down”. In other words, it’s secretive groups, and cliques, with their own agenda, pulling the strings from behind the scenes. All you’ve got to do is look at them, like Freemason symbology on America’s currency. And all of this. The same thing about the French Revolution. Something slightly different about the Russian Revolution. But it’s there as well.

In Juri Lina’s amazing documentary, Under the Sign of the Scorpion, he does a bit of a deep dive into some of the more esoteric, and secretive, groups that had a hand in bringing down the Russian aristocracy and then formulating the Russian Revolution. It was more groups than one.

But in Paradise Lost it’s not like a head-on sort of attack against the law, like the traditional order, it’s always covert. And it’s always being done from behind the scenes.

And in Paradise Lost there’s actually a scene when Satan, and Belial, Moloch, and mammon, and the rest of his lieutenants. They when they get cast out, and they’re all bloodied, and they’ve been thrashed, and they’re in hell, deciding what to do next, Moloch comes up with the idea that they need to basically just go straight back into battle against the forces of good. And Satan comes up with the, or Belial, mouthing Satan, comes up with the idea that they should be more covert. And this is where Satan hatches the idea that he will sneak his way back into God’s realm, into Eden, as it would become, because he was basically busy creating man. And he would use covert means to corrupt from within. And so this again, it’s funny how this repeats itself again, and again, and again throughout the history of like Leftist destruction on earth.

But what’s so surprising about it, is the way today we’re so like saturated in liberalism, that we automatically think of it are as a “good”, or as a “softening force”, a force of freedom and liberation, away from tyranny. And yet, Satan in Paradise Lost he isn’t like a communist, or something like that. He is more like a liberal. He’s a liberal raging against the traditional order and God’s authority. And so what he’s doing is setting people “free”.

And the perfect example of this, of course, will be when he goes into the Garden of Eden, and he tempts Eve to eat the Apple, the forbidden fruit. And this is where we really get to it, of course, when we go back to that disgusting fella at the beginning of the video.

Because what is that? What is pedophilia? It’s a forbidden fruit! And that’s now where they are heading towards. And it begins, and the framing of it as well, they are using like the language of “freedom”, to do. So so you arrive, at this point, where there are no constraints left at all! Anymore! And they’ve done away, long ago, with any sense of right, or wrong. And what they have done is make up these man-made laws. And the man made laws that they can just be changed, because it’s just ink on a piece of paper.

And so when we go back to Paradise Lost, and we see the interaction with Eve, this is precisely what is happening here. It’s a temptation away from the divine authority and towards personal freedom. But once you go into the idea of personal freedom, then you’re kind of cut loose! You don’t really have any kind of direction anymore.

[20:00]

And this was compounded in the history of Leftism. When we come into the more modern era and you begin to see post-modernism enter the scene, because what we begin with all of these rights. And all of these laws. And all of these man-made constructs, to replace the old order.

And then post-modernism comes in. And post-modernism which is also from the Left, of course, and riddled with pedophiles, it then begins to deconstruct all of the laws which were brought in by what amounts to this previous incarnation of itself.

And you can see the famous thing in France with Foucault, and Sartre, and all of these others. And they were all hell-bent on abolishing the age of consent! Why? Because it was arbitrary.

And you can go back to that tweet at the start of it there. And what was also on that thread was this idea he was coming out with was it, … So it was in America, and the age of consent is 16 in this State, and it’s 17 years old in this State, and it’s 18 years old in another State. And then another time they will point out:

“Well, you know, Henry VIII had a 13 year old wife!”

And all of these kinds of things. And what they’re doing is saying:

“Well these laws and the way we thought about this, it hasn’t been consistent. It’s changed slightly over time.”

But especially when it was man-made laws, it changed a lot, because there was no longer any divine authority. It was just men making it up and trying to do the best that they could, to put some constraints and some blocks on society, when they could no longer call on a higher authority.

And so then what the postmodernists do is point out that the things that men made in the past, these laws, doesn’t really make a whole lot of sense. So we have to sort of deconstruct them. And we have to abolish them. And we have to point out that it’s just about power. It was just those with power, were making these laws. And it doesn’t really have anything to do with right, or wrong.

So now we’ve arrived at the point where we abolish that too! Eve cannot explain through a peer-reviewed scientific study of experts why she shouldn’t eat the apple. And so she does! And is therefore liberated.

And so what this does, Satan’s general arc over the course of the whole poem, is one of degeneration. So he begins with the grandstanding, charismatic, sort of defiant speeches against what he calls “the tyranny of heaven”. And then over the course of the story he kind of degenerates. And then it becomes more, and more, that he becomes the sort of the pure hellish creation of nightmares, and, you know, lava and blood, and all of this kind of thing. You can see that he’s going in that direction. He enters as a comet. And by the end of it, he’s just this lisping snake!

And Milton puts his words in a certain way, where the lisping is like very pronounced. There’s lots of s’s, there’s lots of syllables at the start of his words. So it sounds like he’s lisping more, and more, as he goes on. And this mirrors the sort of the way that like liberalism which starts with these grandstanding speeches and appeals towards personal freedom, and man-made laws, based on reason, degenerates and collapses in under itself. And this is again mirrored in Paradise Lost.

And I was reminded of an article that I did, a blog post that I did some years ago on Richard Dawkins. And Richard Dawkins was engaged in a similar issue that I raised at the beginning of the video. And Richard Dawkins was engaged in the debate on abortion. And he was kind of owning a kind of patriotic American.

And Dawkins had been in Africa to some sort of conference about saving the elephant and he pointed out that the an elephant, a baby elephant, or a young elephant, is more worthy of saving. Because the person had said:

“We’re aborting millions of babies across the Western world, and you’re trying to save the elephant.”

And so Dawkins response was that the elephant, it’s been born, it’s alive, and it has empathy, it has feelings, and it has emotions towards it’s family. And a human embryo doesn’t! And so therefore based on reason, it makes more sense to be worried about the elephant than an unborn human embryo.

[25:22]

And the problem is what he’s describing there in the elephant, again, so often this stuff relies on sophistry. Because. If you take that what he’s saying about the baby elephant. The elephant is a noble creature. The elephant is, you know, it’s majestic. People like elephants.

But the problem is what he’d actually described were the basic traits of any mammal. And a rat is a mammal. And the rat studies have shown also has empathy. A rat also cares about it’s siblings. And a rat also knows fear. And it knows degrees of happiness, just like an elephant does.

And so now we can switch, we can remove the elephant from the equation. And we can say:

“Let’s bring the rat in instead.”

So now that argument is, all of a sudden, the rat is worth more than an unborn human child, or an embryo is, in this case! So now an unborn human actually doesn’t have as much empathy. And it doesn’t have as much feelings as a fully grown rat, amongst its siblings.

So according to Dawkins’s logic, the rat is more important. And so you see that very quickly what is supposed to be this rational mindset, it very quickly takes you towards hell, if it isn’t kind of shackled to ideas of objective goodness in the world. You can see how quickly it degenerates, just like Satan.

Because eventually he’s rationalizing the most hideous acts that you can possibly imagine. You can see this playing out in Dostoevsky’s work, as well. Something like Crime and Punishment.

So in the story of Crime and Punishment you’ve got the young student in his dilapidated department building, disaffected with the world. And he looks at his landlord, which is a woman, an old woman, and she’s a horrible person, and she’s greedy, and she’s charging them too much rent. And she doesn’t really offer the world anything good at all.

And so Raskolnikov’s sort of runs the maths and comes up with the conclusion that the world would be better if she was dead! Like the world is not going to be any worse off, if he takes an axe and murders his landlady, because she’s just a terrible person! She’s greedy, she’s unpleasant, and she doesn’t give anything back. So if you remove her from the world, then will be a better place. It’s as simple as that. And that’s what he does. And then he has to suffer the consequences on his conscience, and everything like that.

But what really comes in there is a kind of utilitarianism, so that what constitutes “good” becomes a matter of running the numbers. And you can see the technocrats in the world doing that today. Which is why I kind of speak out about it so much, because I can’t stand it! Because you end up rationalizing your way into committing acts of complete barbarism! You end up asking for a scientific peer-reviewed study on why paedophilia is wrong! You end up saying:

“Well a creature such as a rat has empathy, and feelings, and an unborn human doesn’t, therefore the rat is more worthy of life!”

And at each stage it began with just rationalism. It began with:

“Well, we can use our reason as men, to formulate all of these laws. And all of these moral norms. And everything will be just fine! We’ll just do it all ourselves. And then we’ll write it in.”

And then slowly, but surely the laws change. Because the thinking changes. And it always deteriorates. And it begins with liberalism, and it brings you where you are now. So to the question of, have they been hijacked? Has this like thought been hijacked in recent years? And that we can get rid of the Woke stuff, and everything will be grand?

No! I’m afraid this is the path that which began a long time ago, reaching it’s final kind of hellish conclusion. And at every stage it seems to mirror the descent of the rebellion against authority, against God. And then you end up where you’re having to say:

“Okay, well we, like Satan, I’ll just make it up! I’ll just relativize all of this stuff. And I’ll just make up my own laws. And we will at least be free! We will be liberated And that’s what happens. We’re going to liberate everybody! Everybody should be able to do whatever they want. And what we will do, we’ll just put some laws in, here and there!”

[30:29]

And it’s been [chuckling] just a bloodbath for hundreds of years, at the end of the day! And the question is, what is the response to this? What has become a political philosophy which, even if we grant, which a lot of people would dispute, even if we grant that it meant well, which, you know, … when you look at what happened in something like the French Revolution, doubt! But even then, like it’s obviously degraded into something now which is quite literally satanic.

So, what is the response to this? What is the response to this problem?

Let me know in the comments below.

And thanks for listening folks.

[31:21]

[Outro music and imagery by Theberton.]

[31:45]

END

[Readers: If you see any errors (however minor), or ways to improve things, in the transcript, please let me know in the Comment section. Also please share the link to this transcript, so others can benefit. Thanks.]

============================================

xx UNFINISHED TRANSCRIPTS — Volunteers Needed

============================================

PDF Notes

* Total transcript words = 4,517

* Total post words = 5,007

* Total images = xx

* Total A4 pages = xx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

Version History

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2: Corrected name McDermott > McDiarmid. Thanks to commenter Heimdall in Africa.

Version 1: Nov 13, 2021 — Published post.

Morgoth’s Review – The Frozen North & Frozen Thinking – Feb 10, 2021 — Transcript

admin — Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:11:42 +0000

[Morgoth muses on how the harsh winters of northern Europe made altruism an evolved trait that aided in our ability to survive. Which is now being used against us by the (((usual suspects))).

— KATANA]

Morgoth’s Review

The Frozen North

&

Frozen Thinking

Feb 10, 2021

Click here for the video:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/yHpad4Q8gpTx/

Published on Feb 10, 2021

BitChute Description

Morgoth’s Review

First published at 12:01 UTC on February 10th, 2021.

channel image

Morgoth’s Review

11306 subscribers

Thanks to everyone who supports my work
https://www.subscribestar.com/morgoth-s-review

Thanks to Theberton for the intros and outros

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_0K…

TRANSCRIPT

(11:15 mins)

[00:00]

[Intro music and imagery by Theberton.]

[00:29]

Hello there folks. So I’ve braved the brimstone Darcy, or whatever, and come out for a wander here in the north, the barren north. And I’m just looking at this landscape. On the one hand it’s absolutely spectacular, it’s beautiful! But, on the other hand, I’m looking at I’m thinking back in primordial ages, thousands of thousands of years ago, when European people actually had to scratch out a living on this.

I mean, these days it’s kind of we assume barrenness are places which are hard to live. And we assume that Europe and northern Europe was some bountiful place. Well it is for a small portion of the year. But like for a sizable portion of the year it looks like this. And it would have looked like this a lot more in the past. So just imagine like waking up every day and then like thinking that you’re going to have to survive in this.

Where’s the food coming from? Where, even the water that you drink is turned into a solid block! And that’s not even to mention, the fact that you’re gonna have to keep warm.

And so you get this sense that when you come out on days like this, like in the past, European people were just under assault from nature like on all sides! So I mean, some of the things that I’ve got into recently is this overcoming of nature, this conquering of the natural world.

But when you look at a place like this and you think about how people had to survive in days gone by, you can see where that drive actually originated from. Because it was just the European, the northern European, being under assault, heavy assault from nature at every turn.

And people like Kevin MacDonald have said, like this is what led to altruism on a more sort of individualistic society. I mean, one of the things I remember reading in one of his books was that if you’re a thief, or a bit of a scoundrel, in amongst, in such a harsh environment, then you will naturally just be outcasted by everybody else, because you can’t be trusted. And, you know, people will die essentially.

Whereas, if you can’t be trusted and you bought a, I don’t know, like a turnip for a piece of fish, then that’s so highly rewarded, that’s going to be become part of a network. Because that plays in with the individualist side of it, which is people scattered, just scattered, across the barren wastes. So when you actually do meet somebody else, the tendency, the incentive was to be nice and kind, and exchange goods, in order that everybody would survive. Whereas the thief, or the liar, would be thrown out.

So you can see, in a way, that this kind of harsh environment actually did lead, in the end, to a high trust society. That was kind of the argument there. Where if everybody is settled for thousands of years in this, and they have to trust each other in order to cooperate just to survive, you can see that the high trust society was kind of almost built into the DNA of the land, if you like.

There’s a big problem with this though. And it’s a tendency that leads towards universalism, which can be misused. It means you can have out groups come in and rig the game! But when we look at so many of the, say something like liberalism, you can see that it kind of shines through.

But so, this gets me back to an argument that I was having with a sort of high-tory, neo-liberal, shill type. Now I know that for a lot of these people that just loathsome lying bastards, and they’re cowards who don’t want to go against the sort of dominant orthodoxy of the day. But nevertheless, I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt here just for framing this argument a little bit.

We were talking about the, let’s just say, the changing face of England. And he was calling me a racist! And he was falling back on an argument, which basically was one of individuals. Where you shouldn’t judge groups, we shouldn’t judge whole groups, we should only judge the individual.

And the problem is that makes us blind! Because, if we go back to the idea of pathological altruism, and the idea of where we had to coordinate in the barren north in order just to scrape by in these harsh winters, then what you’re going to see is that this is something, which is specific to Europeans. And which doesn’t apply to other people from other parts of the world.

And so there’s this grim irony here, where our kind of thought processes and ways of looking at that world are being weaponized and used against us! But these people are so blind!

And, by the way, like I say — this is just to give them the benefit of the doubt — these people are so blinded by that, they can’t actually even break through it, to see that, well the other people had a different path through life, even to the evolutionary degree. They grew up and sort of came of age as groups in a different part of the world, and had a different outlook on life.

So then he’s going to say that, the assumption then, is that all of them, everybody across the world shares the same traits as the high trust northern Europeans! Even though they come from completely different environments and had different pressures on them across time.

What’s more, is that normally I don’t even talk in these kind of empirical Darwinian terms. I’m more of an idealist. But again this is like their ballpark. So these people are like classic liberals! This is their thing! These kind of scientific and empirical theories based on evolutionary pressures. And all of this that’s what they should be defending.

And it becomes so chronic that, because of the pressures mainly on society today on the propaganda we get, which I think informs their position more than any real understanding, we can sort of see that the universalism that was born out on the northern plains, has now become so such a dominant worldview that we can’t even assume that not everybody else shares it.

So another problem that we get with these people — who can’t see past the universalism, they can’t see that it’s only one group that’s actually has a historical path for that — another problem they have is this thing where it’s that you come in contact with the reality of it. The reality of it not actually being the case in the real world, and then in the abstraction. In other words, it’s to say:

“Well it should be like that! And we just have to work on it!”

And it’s not actually happening in the real world, because of this reason, or that reason. And usually they’ll cite outliers. You’ll cite one group behaves in a way which isn’t universalistic, or even I mean, more, and more, just has complete contempt for, they say, us. And then they’ll write that off as like an outlier.

But then you’ll take another one. And it’s another outlier. You say to another example. And it’s another outlier. And so all of a sudden you’ve got like the situation where the outliers are the norm! But they can’t see that, because the abstraction is still there. It should be like this, but we don’t know why!

And they don’t know why, because they are the only ones who are even expected, or have any kind of evolutionary pressure put on them for thousands of years, to think in these ways. To have that kind of intergroup altruism, if you go back to what I was talking about. When you bump into somebody and have a bit of barter and trade with them on the barren steppe of the north in winter. None of the other groups have any of that. They don’t display it! They don’t show any interest in it! And yet still! Still! You get these people, these kind of center right Tory types, these classic liberal types, who just refuse to see reality!

And funny enough, like this is another trait of this universalist European thing, is to boot everything into this fair space of abstraction, and not actually, … I mean, on the one hand it led to beautiful art, music, because you can pull it out of this here. But then at the same time it leaves people completely myopic to what’s going on, like actually on the ground!

So they’re being like cucked on all sides, and under assault from all sides, like what was once nature. So instead, it’s like humanity now! Humanity is the pressurizing force in the way that nature was in times gone by! But these idiots just can’t see it! I can’t stand them all! I can’t stand the shallow materialism as well. Because even what I’m saying now, they would ask:

“Well do you have a citation for that? Do you have this for that? Do you have?”

They can’t use reason. And they’re stuck in this kind of suicidal paradigm! And I’ve just got nothing but contempt for them!

So now that’s off my mind, I’m gonna carry on blowing the cobwebs away in this harsh barren climate! [chuckling].

I’ll catch you later folks.

[10:29]

[Outro music and imagery by Theberton.]

[11:15]

END

============================================

xx UNFINISHED TRANSCRIPTS — Volunteers Needed

============================================

PDF Notes

* Total words = 1,813

* Total images = 6

* Total A4 pages = xx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

Version History

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Feb 16, 2021 — Published post.

Millennial Woes – Millenniyule 2020 – The Jolly Heretic – Dec 29, 2020 — Transcript

admin — Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:09:57 +0000

[Millennial Woes continues his tradition of yearly Millenniyule series of interviews that started in Dec, 2016.

Here he chats with the thought provoking and entertaining Prof Ed Dutton, aka The Jolly Heretic, an Englishman living in Finland. They discuss witches, both old and new, the damaging effects to academia done by too many females, sex and violence, feminism, the patriarchy, etc.

— KATANA.]

_______________________

Millenniyule 2020

The Jolly Heretic

Dec 29, 2020

Click the link below to view the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nH6y6ObISGs

Also on BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/nH6y6ObISGs/

YouTube Description

Published on Dec 29, 2020

Millenniyule 2020: The Jolly Heretic
17,408 views
•Streamed live on Dec 30, 2020
581
20
Share
Save
Millennial Woes
56.3K subscribers
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMRs…
https://www.millennialwoes.com/millen…
https://www.millennialwoes.com/donate

463 Comments

__________________________

TRANSCRIPT

(103:50)

[00:00]

Woes: Dr Edward Dutton. So Ed welcome to Millenniyule!

Ed Dutton: Hello. Thank you for having me again. How’s it going?

Woes: It’s going quite well so far. As I say we’ve only got one, two, nights left. Well one night after this. So Millenniyule 2020 seems to have been a great success I’m very glad to say. So anyway, what kind of year have you had before we go into the main topic.

Ed Dutton: Well, what’s been going on this year? So I was working on, for a lot of the year, on a book, on a number of books. Well, at the end of last year I got onto the radar of Hope Not Hate! That was good fun. So I was in their magazine, whatever. Their thing about YouTube people.

Woes: Yeah. Annual State of Hate Report.

Ed Dutton: Chucked off PayPal and things like this. And then I carried on with my YouTube channel.

And then my colleague Michael Woodley of [word unclear], for various reasons left the YouTube channel halfway through the year. So I had to rebuild it. Which at first I was quite frightened about. And it was a bit of a kick in the nuts really. But I seem to have managed to do that. So I was quite pleased about that. I kept that going and whatever.

And then I’ve been working on a number of books. One’s called “Making Sense of Race”, which was published a few weeks ago. And then I’m working on a book at the moment called “Witch is Feminism and the Fall of the West” which looks at how our society is increasingly dominated by literal witches!

And then I’m working on a book on the future of civilization have in terms of breeding patterns for political views. And then I’m working on a book about the future Christianity. And then I’ve done various papers on various topics, intelligence, and religion and intelligence, and things like this. And then otherwise there was, …

Oh! And I was made professor! I was recognized! I was made full professor of Evolutionary Psychology at Asbiro university in Poland, despite all the evil.

Woes: Congratulations on that!

Ed Dutton: And then what else has gone on? And then, no. And then, that’s it! And then well, I one thing I got back into the other day with my, … I was couldn’t work out what to buy my son for Christmas. And so I got him a WWF wrestling game for the playstation. And I’d completely forgotten about how brilliant WWF was.

And then I found out about all the skullduggery behind the scenes and all this stuff, which I’ve been watching documentaries about that. And then I’ve noticed that the wokeness of wrestling! So now the wrestlers have gone from being big, beefy, guys they were in the early 90s, to people that like:

“Oh. I don’t take steroids, because I’m too moral. And I’m a moral woke wrestler!”

This is what’s going on now. So even that’s fallen into wokeness. And lots of women wrestlers and stuff like that, as well. So even that’s gone! Even they’ve even taken hold of WWF, which is very sad. So yes, that’s been my year. What about yours?

[03:03]

Woes: Oh it’s been not quite as productive as your year, from the sounds of it. But yeah, I mean, most people have talked about the BLM have Covid, and lockdown, and the US election. But obviously, you. And I have a different topic that we’re going to discuss. It’s to do with the book that you’ve got coming out next next year, about witches, transsexualism, and feminism.

Ed Dutton: Which is in “Witch is Feminism and the Fall of the West”.

Woes: And the fall of the West. Okay. So, first of all could you get us into this topic by discussing the archetype, or the figure of the “witch”?

Ed Dutton: Yeah. So I got thinking about it, … There was a comment actually that was made by Robin Riley, who I think you interviewed. And it was that comment that inspired it. That she was confronted with these purple-headed dragons, or something, and she said:

“Oh, could we start burning witches again?”

And I thought:

“That’s interesting! What are the kind of people that were witches in pre-modern England?”

I mean, the height of the witchcraft was the 17th century. And what were the kind of people that are witches now? What was going on? What’s the dynamic of the witch? What does the witch actually do? What’s her function? Why did they want to kill them? Are we supposed to believe the narrative that they were just unpleasant? They were just picked on, or whatever? Or is there something more to it?

And the more you look into it, what you’ve got is a system in evolutionary terms, as I discussed when I was on here last year, you can pass on your genes directly by having children. You can pass them on kin selection by looking after your nephews and nieces. And you can pass them on by elevating your inclusive fitness! That is your group, your extended kinship group, your ethnic group.

And once that happens then well certainly with the aristocracy of these two groups fighting, you get into a situation of group selection. Of two groups fighting each other to win out. And then, if you look at the qualities which ensure that you would dominate, that you win in the battle of group selection — and computer modeling has looked at those — these are high positive and negative ethnocentrism. High positive ethnocentrism is internal cooperation. High negative ethnocentrism external violence. So those are the groups that dominate.

So what the group is going to be selected to do, is to optimize it’s group fitness by ensuring it’s ethnocentric. How does it do this? Well, one of the things it does is it brings in religion. And religion makes adaptive things i.e., positive and negative ethnocentrism into the will of god. But another thing it needs to do, is it needs to ensure there isn’t much conflict. You need in cooperation.

So you can’t have inter-male conflict. Inter-male conflict is a bad thing! Now a lot of societies, weak societies, they’re under weak levels of selection pressure, like in Africa, or whatever. There’s massive inter-male conflict, because there’s polygamy. And so all of the women want to go for the high status males.

[06:00]

And so you get, in the case of the Bushmen, about 60% of the male population don’t breed! And what those men spend their time doing, is fighting and whatever. And so there’s this very little in the way of cooperation! It’s not good for the group.

So you have to reduce inter-male conflict! How do you reduce inter-male conflict? You create patriarchy! And there was a fascinating paper which looked at this. It was in the “Mankind Quarterly”. You create patriarchy. What patriarchy does it means that the male has control over the female. He controls her sexuality. She is controlled, by him whatever means it is. Whether it’s foot binding, or veiling, or whatever. But he controls her sexuality, so she is not independent of him. And that’s patriarchy.

And therefore the patriarchy helps to ensure the group is more positively and negatively ethnocentric. And therefore the patriarchy becomes part of the religiousness and becomes the will of god, and is promoted as the will of god. So that’s it! And the witches deviate from this.

And if you look at the kind of people that were accused of being witches everywhere — men are a slight exception that we I look at separately in the book. Basically the men that are accused of being witches are anti-social men! So they’re damaging to group selection. Group selection is about cooperation. They’re anti-social men! So they get accused of witchcraft. Deeply unpopular anti-social types.

It’s mostly women, because what these women are doing is inadvertently questioning the patriarchy. They do that in a number of ways. One, they work as prostitutes. They work as financially independent women, which is showing other women that they can operate outside the patriarchy, and which is also undermining the system of sexual ethics, and whatever. So prostitutes are accused of being witches.

Two, they’re sexually loosely! They have illegitimate children. Things like this. Again, they’re not conforming to the patriarchy. They should never be alone with a man. They’re not conforming to the patriarchy!

So thirdly, they are independent women, they’re widows that have money, and are independent, or they’re spinsters and they never marry. And so they operate as independent women.

Fourthly, they are anti-social women, who in a context of literal belief in witchcraft do actually believe it. They’re basically operating a separate religion of folk magic, which is therefore a rival to the patriarchal system. And so some of these people would genuinely believe that they were witches. And they would genuinely believe they had magic powers. And they would confess to it, and whatever.

And so in all of these ways that you can see that from an evolutionary perspective these witches were people that were undermining the patriarchy. And that’s why at times of intense selection — and that’s what the 16th the 17th century was, it was bloody cold — there was very intense group selection.

And so you can see how therefore the group is under harsh selection for religiousness. And it becomes so religious that gradually across the 16th and 17th century they start persecuting witches, particularly in your native Scotland. That was where it was very, very intense.

[09:02]

James sixth of Scotland, first of England, wrote a book on this, which I quoted extensively in my own book and he said:

“Witches are real!”

And I agree with him. So this is basically what you have. This is the nature of the witch! It is the person that undermines the patriarchal system. And in a system of harsh group selection it is adaptive to remove those people from the population, because they will spread negative social epistasis. They will spread behavior which undermines the group’s inclusive fitness. And so therefore they had to be removed, or they had to be stopped. And that’s what you get!

And you get it more intensely the more harsh the group selection. So it’s much harsher in the north of Europe than in the south of Europe. And so, yeah that’s basically the essence of it.

Woes: I can imagine a feminist hearing this and feeling quite vindicated. That witchcraft, the demonizing of certain women, was all an attempt by men to stay in power and maintain their power structure. And you seem to be saying that:

“Yes! That’s exactly what it was!”

Ed Dutton: Well, there’s slightly more to it than that. So yes, this is the nature of these witches. And so what you have is a society which is adapted towards patriarchy. If you are a female and you are patriarchal, you will signal that you are patriarchal. You will signal that you are religious. This is why one of the reasons why women are more religious than men.

Men will want religiousness, because it will be a sign, the woman is saying in order to have sex with me you have to invest! Then the man wants evidence that she’s not going to cuckold him. What is the evidence that she’s not going to cuckold him? It’s conformity to the patriarchal system. What is the evidence that they conform to the patriarchal system? It’s religiousness!

So you’re going to have a system where religiousness is going to become selected for, particularly in women, where submission to the patriarchal system is going to become selected for, particularly in women, and women that don’t select for, don’t conform, will not pass on their genes. And so the way that you will get women who don’t conform to the patriarchal system, and who go into prostitution, and illegitimacy, and witchcraft, and all these things that deviate from the patriarchal system, is through mutation. So you’ll get mutant genes!

Woes: Spiteful mutants!

Ed Dutton: Right! People who are high in mutational load will be born every generation, and they will die, because the child mortality rate in 17th century, 18th century, was 50%. And they will die out to varying degrees, of course, but they will die out.

And what you would expect is for these people who deviated mentally from the norm in terms of not being patriarchal and thus being accused of witchcraft for that reason, you’d also expect them to express other maladaptive behavior. Such as being mentally ill. Such as having depression. Such as having schizophrenia. Such as histrionic disorder. Such as being anti-social. Such as all the things that are associated with witches! So you’d expect them to be these ghastly, nasty, psychopathic, women who we are warned in fairy tales that we have to avoid! These nasty women, that live in gingerbread houses and kill you, or whatever.

And that’s what these women were! They were at the bottom of society, because and not only that, but, of course, the brain is about 84 percent of the genome. And so if you’ve got mutations of the brain, you’re going to sure as dammit have mutations of the body, because the brain is a massive target for mutation. And so this means that they’re going to be physically ugly! They’re going to have ugly faces, and big noses, and big chins. And they’re going to age quickly, just as the stereotypical witch did!

[13:00]

And. So if you look in detail those that were targeted, it was women who were spinsters, it was women, … I think I read that it was over half of those that were executed for witchcraft across the 17th century were spinsters, over the age of 50.

Woes: So that’s, because they were ugly?

Ed Dutton: Exactly! Why would they spinsters. Because they were ugly! Because men don’t want ugly women.

Woes: But then the other fifty percent of them must have been sexually promiscuous.

Ed Dutton: Widows, prostitutes, those that practiced magic, whatever. But yeah, so generally they were physically unattractive. So you have a situation where under conditions of harsh Darwinian selection, health correlates with intelligence, health correlates with good character, good character intelligence, good genes and they all are co-morbid.

And so those that rise to the top in that kind of society, are going to be highly patriarchal. And those that deviate from this, will be at the bottom, because of their personality, because of their low intelligence.

And, because of their high mutational load, which will mean that they’ll be more likely to find them being witches. So they were at the bottom of society these people, these anti-feminists. These women who were adapted to a fast life history strategy and ecology. Basically of the pump and dump, of live fast, die young. That’s the kind of people we’re talking about, right? Basically women that were whores, sluts, or wanna be whores, sluts. And that’s who ends up at the bottom of society.

Now, once those conditions break down. And that’s what you get in 1800. Once those conditions break down. So we go from 50% child mortality to 1% child mortality today, then you get a huge rise in mutational load across the population. You get more, and more, people who are mentally ill more, who deviate from what we were selected for was to be patriarchal, was to be religious, was to be pro-social personality, and was to be intelligent.

And you get more, and more, people that deviate from this. And it’s gonna normally be in a negative direction, because it was so strongly selected for these things. And they are going to be higher in mutational load. And they’re going to be physically ugly, and whatever.

But the selection pressure broke down first among the higher classes! They were under weaker selection pressure for longer. What is it that weakens selection pressure? Good housing, access to medicine, wealth basically. And so they have been under weaker selection for longer. And so you’re going to expect higher mutational load.

Remember the heritability of socioeconomic status is very high! It’s about 0.7. Higher mutational load among the higher classes. And therefore the witch, the women who are these maladaptive spiteful mutant witches, have moved from the lower classes to the upper classes!

And you get these women in those classes who are anti-patriarchal, who advocate male roles for women, who are aggressive, who are anti-religious, who advocate destructive ideologies for the group, who advocate things that just mess the group up and make the group maladaptive, and low and positive and negative ethnocentrism, who advocate the destruction — what is it that causes the reduction into male conflict monogamy? So they advocate the breakdown of monogamy.

So you have an increasing system whereby there’s lots of men that can’t get women. And so you have, you know, as we now see. And so they have lesbianicious tendencies. And they are feminists! They call themselves feminists. And they are the modern day witches!

And they are also physically ugly! I mean, there’s detailed studies on this that show that feminist identification correlates being ugly! It correlates with having masculine hands! It correlates with all kinds of markers of being [word unclear] and unattractive.

So you have basically these witch spinsters of yore, and the witch spinsters now! The social class has changed. But they are both witches. And the difference was that under pre-modern conditions we were adapted to be highly religious and thus skeptical of witches, so we dealt with them! Right? We jailed them, or we hanged them.

Now, because of a build-up of mutational load. And also, because of the destruction of the conservative society, and the inculcation of society, the flip of society over to these Leftist values that promotes Leftist ideas, anti-group ideas, as the norm.

Once you reach about 20 percent of the society advocating maladaptive things everyone moves over, apart from the genetic cream. Then people are inculcated by these feminists. Normal women are inculcated by these feminists to do maladaptive things. To delay fertility. To not have children, and whatever. And to destroy their own children! To allow their own children to be transsexuals. To what whatever it happens to be.

And. So that’s what I think we’ve got. The modern day feminists are literally witches! And when James VI of Scotland said:

“Witches are real.”

Yeah, they are. And they’re here now, and they’re called feminists!

Woes: But he didn’t mean, just for the sake of clarification, when James VI said that, he didn’t mean that witches are real in the sense of supernatural beings, you know, working with potions that alter, you know, affect life in a metaphysical way, did he?

Ed Dutton: Yeah! He strongly believed in, he literally believed in witches. And he believed that they tried to kill him when he was trying to get married to his Norwegian wife. And they tried to sink his ship. And that’s how this witch craze in southern Scotland in the 1590s, that’s how that started. And lots and lots of people were killed.

[19:15]

Woes: But out of interest, do you believe that there is any supernatural element to this? And presumably not.

Ed Dutton: No. But I think that what you’re dealing with the same type of people. But, for the reason I laid out, these people have migrated from the lower class, from what was called the lower sort the people at the bottom of society, to the people basically near the top of society, which is where these feminists tend to be.

Woes: Yeah. The Champagne socialists.

Ed Dutton: Yeah! Yeah! But you’ve got to talk about the really extreme examples, because a champagne socialist might just be some stupid private school girl, like Harriet Harman*, or something that push pushes the society in a maladaptive direction.

[Harriet Ruth Harman is a British politician and solicitor who has served as Member of Parliament for Camberwell and Peckham, formerly Peckham, since 1982. A member of the Labour Party, she has served in various Cabinet and Shadow Cabinet positions.]

I’m talking about the people who influence her! So the Andrea Dworkin, the Kate Millet! The real battle axe feminists.

Now one of the interesting things about. And it’s a parallel, so what we’re thinking is that women are selected to patriarchy. What does that mean? It means that the woman is submissive! It means that the woman is selected to what’s called a slow life history strategy. A woman that’s selected to patriarchy is the kind of woman that is selected to a society where you invest! The man invests in the woman, and the man invests in the children. And the woman invests in the man, and is loyal to the man. And the woman invests and nurtures the children

So we’re talking about a mother, rather than a whore, basically. If you think about the deviation from this, is a fast life history strategy. If you’re evolved to an unstable ecology, live fast, die young, you could be wiped out at any minute. And so you don’t bother with nurture and bonding with people, because there might never be any pay off.

Woes: R-type and K-type.

Ed Dutton: Yeah, R-type individual. That’s right, as we talked about last year. And so those, …

Woes: There is actually the expression “fast women” ironically, from decades gone by.

Ed Dutton: Right. Yeah, well that’s what we’re talking about. These kinds of women, right? And so they are evolved to an ecology of violence and whatever, where the men don’t invest in them. It’s not patriarchal at all! The men don’t invest in them, they are not invested in. They have to take on some of the male roles. It’s perhaps the polygamy and the man will invest in them for a bit, and then shun them in favor of the new younger, more nubile wife. And so they will have to bring up their children somehow. One of the things they will do, by the way, is alloparent*.

[Alloparenting is a term used to classify any form of parental care provided by an individual towards a non-descendant young. Non-descendant refers to any young who is not the direct genetic offspring of the individual, but does not exclude related young such as siblings, or grandchildren].

So they’ll get together with other co-wives and like lesbianiciously bring up the children. And it’s been suggested that’s the heritability of sexuality in women is very, very low. It’s 0.2. And it’s been suggested that one of the reasons for this is that women are adapted to this kind of situation, where you have to be able to — you’re going to get dumped, basically. So you have to be able to bring up your children.

And so you bond strongly to the point of sex with another woman, and you co-parent your children. Which is what happens to Sanna Marin [born 16 November 1985] who’s the current Prime Minister of Finland [since Dec, 2019]. We have it, by the way, a kind of witch government of Finland! I call them the spice girls. But you, …

Woes: Or the spiteful girls! [chuckling]

Ed Dutton: Spiteful girls! That’s very good, my Scottish friend in earlier, calls from the “spice girls”. He came up with that one. But the “spiteful girls”, that’s excellent! That’s right, that’s very good! I might have to quote you on that.

And so what you have is these women who, because they have to take on some of the masculine roles, because they’re not being looked after, there’s no patriarchy, they’re more masculinized! They’re much more physically and mentally masculinized.

Now one of the things that’s interesting in terms of the witch. So you’re [word unclear] and therefore they’re physically ugly and unattractive, which is true stereotypically, and provenly true of these feminists . And, of course, true based on the historical sources of these witches. Masculinized, unattractive, ugly, women. Also faster life history strategy, greater diversity, more ugliness.

[23:08]

But what’s fascinating is the fantasies they have. So it’s been shown that women feminist identification weakly correlates with having rape fantasies.

Now, why would that be the case? Well, because if you’re in a fast life history ecology, the kind of man you want, the kind of man whose genes will be passed on, the kind of man if you have his children your children will survive, will be a violent, domineering kind of kind of guy, because that’s who survives in an unstable ecology. Selection isn’t particular particularly favoring intelligence, or emotions, or character, or whatever. It favors a violent, you know, sort of WWE [World Wrestling Entertainment] wrestler, Chris Benoit type. Well that’s perhaps not a good example, but whatever.

Woes: It’s interesting thing that such women also create social discord, so that it is the violent men who will be able to survive that situation.

Ed Dutton: That’s a very good point! Precisely. That’s what I want to move on to now. You’re ahead of me here Woes! So it’s like sperm selection. So the man ejaculates with half a billion spermatozoa, and the woman’s immune system, she wants to get pregnant,. But she also does everything she can to kill the sperm! So that only the strongest possible sperm can get through. Only the R-strategy sperm, if you like, can get through. So she violently repels the sperm, like she’s being raped! She fights it off. And ultimately only the strongest man, the strongest sperm, if any of them, can get past her violent defenses. And then that’s the one by which she gets pregnant. Well, that’s how these rape fantasies work.

The woman is dominated by, she’s fantasizing about being raped by a fast life history man who can’t keep his hands off her. But ultimately, you know, by doing that, he’s proving ironically, that paradoxically, that he’s the man she wants. And so these fast life history strategy women will tend to have rape fantasies.

And feminist identification has been shown to correlate with having, ironically, having rape fantasies. And two of the major feminists, or second wave feminists that you may have heard of, (((Andrea Dworkin))) and Kate Millet, both had intense rape fantasies, and wrote about them.

In the case of Andrea Dworkin she thought it was real! Obviously it wasn’t. I mean, she was a fat, ugly, hairy, old woman!

I’ve got a paper that’s coming out soon on this. If you look at the witches in the 17th century. Right, first of all in England, not Scotland, forget Scotland, that’s different. In England they weren’t subject to torture, other than in the case of Matthew Hopkins, the Witch Finder General, where they were walked and sleep deprived. But put that thing aside. They weren’t subject to torture. They admitted freely to — in many cases it is documented — to being raped, to having sex with the devil!:

[26:06]

“The devil appeared to me in the form of a black man, and he had sex with me on six consecutive nights; the devil appeared in my chamber and he sucked my breasts until it hurts, and then he had sex with me from behind.”

Now what I think these were, were rape fantasies. And I think these are the kind of women who we would expect to have rape fantasies. These fast life history strategy, relatively fast strategy women. And I think that they were having, … There’s no reason, they weren’t tortured, they weren’t induced.

And if you go back, the idea of the incubus, is very ancient it’s not some new thing that was created, or something, by the patriarchy to have a go at women, or whatever. It’s very ancient, the idea of the incubus, of women, these night devils. And equally, .

Woes: Is that the same as the succubus?

Ed Dutton: The succubus is a woman. A succubus is a woman. And now that’s an interesting point as well. Because if you look at the research on BDSM. So people that like, you know, hitting, and whipping, and canning, and stuff like this. Those people are tend to be fast life history strategists. And also the tendency is for the women to like to be hit, which makes sense, and the men to like to hit.

Now why does, why is that the case? Well, because we know from the evolution of sex. There’s a very interesting book on this called “A History of Rape”, or something, “A Natural History of Rape”. I can’t remember the author, Palmer and something, or other.

And they look at this. Why is sex related to violence? Why do men become more aroused by violent porn than normal porn? They become more aroused by rape porn than normal porn. They ejaculate more when watching rape porn, and violent porn, than normal porn, right?

What’s going on? Well what’s happening is that in pre-history men that raped passed on more of their genes, of course! So, how do you pass all genes? Normally within marriage, or whatever. But also by ganging together and going around and gang raping. As you see with these Muslim immigrants, whatever, that are right at the bottom of society. That’s how you do it. And so therefore it would make sense that a man would be sexually aroused by violence. It would make sense that the two would go together, because it was the men that were, …

Woes: Yeah. I have heard that the parts of the brain in men that process violence and process sex are overlapping. I don’t know if that’s a physical thing, or just functional correlation.

Ed Dutton: Equally with women, you’re gonna get the same sort of thing. The women that would in a sense be aroused by violence, would get the more violent man. And that would be the man with the better gene quality in a fast life history strategy ecology, or the women that would just give in and would not be killed, or whatever.

So there was an advantage to being aroused by violence. And this would be higher among fast life history strategy people. And so you can see where these relationships come from. And then that you can again further understand the relationship between fast life history strategy, non-patriarchal types, and this rape fantasies, and whatever. So I think that’s what you’re dealing with.

And I think that basically this irony that these women who are these feminists, and whatever, go on about how:

“I’m an independent woman!”

And they ultimately, probably, want to be hit, and smacked, and beaten up! And that’s what they want.

[29:39]

Woes: There does seem to be a correlate. I mean, you hear about this. A correlation between women who hate men, and women who want to be beaten up by men. And rape fantasies, and so on.

Just for the sake of clarification, because some people are saying in the live chat that they don’t have rape fantasy, they don’t like violent porn. For the record, [chuckling] I certainly don’t like it.

Ed Dutton: Hang on! Wait a minute. We are a broadly nationalist show yeah?

Woes: Yeah.

Ed Dutton: So people who are going to watch are going to be highly group selected and patriarchal. So why would they like rape fantasies and violent porn?

Woes: I see. I just wondered, because you were saying it’s part of our makeup from, ..

Ed Dutton: It is part of our makeup. But you’re going to get group and individual variation in the extent of it. And what I would expect is that the kind of people that were religious, or were patriarchal, or who would have survived under harsh Darwinian conditions that I’m talking about, they would be less inclined towards this stuff, than the mutants, than the feminists, than the witches, than whatever. So that’s it!

So if I was on this show and there were a lot of Leftists watching. And they were perfectly honest, I think they would perhaps say:

“Yeah, I bloody well like this kind of stuff!”

The other thing I was going to say though, that you mentioned with the succubus, was that the relationship is in general that when it comes to BDSM the men like to be the dominant partner and the woman the submissive.

But there is crossover. And so you do get some, particularly men, that like to be the submissive. Why? Well, because if the woman could dominate them, then there’s a sense in which it’s like she’s a fast history strategy woman. Her genes would survive, good to get her pregnant.

Woes: Right.

Ed Dutton: So you can see some crossover. But in general, not. So basically that’s it.

So the rise of feminism then on that level is extremely bad for society! It’s the rise of anti-ethnocentrism. It elevates into male conflict, and it makes the society less group selected. And those that are advocating it are in that sense paralleling modern witches.

The second problem then is another element of a society that dominates, that wins in the battle of group selection, is ingenuity, is intelligence, is genius. And what the genius is outlier high IQ combined with, … By the way, you said there’s a chat. I can’t see the chat! Where is this chat that you’ll see? I can’t see any chat in the comments.

Woes: Oh, hold up. All right, yes, because Stream Yard doesn’t show that. Hold on a second I’ll show you where it is. I’ll send this to you on Telegram so you can, ..

Ed Dutton: All right. What’s that on then? Oh yes. All right.

So the other way that you win in the battle of group selection is genius. So even though the Japanese and the Chinese are more ethnocentric than us, they have a smaller gene pool than us, and they produce fewer per capita geniuses. They have fewer outliers, they produce fewer geniuses.

And so what is the genius? The geniuses outlier high intelligence plus moderately psychopathic traits. That’s what the genius is. And so that means that he can come up with the original idea and he thinks outside the box, low conscientiousness, and he doesn’t care about offending people, which new ideas almost always do! You know, I had a chap on my show and he’s disputing dark matter. And there’s so much wrapped up in that he’s like an outcast in physics, just disputing dark matter.

[33:09]

So women are a problem then! The promotion of women in academia then becomes, and in life in general, becomes a problem, because there’s less female genius. And one of the things that you have to do is you have to nurture geniuses. They’re often these kind of impractical types, they need someone to do their laundry for them, or do their cooking for them, or whatever.

And so the universities were a place that nurtured genius. They would allow these people to get there and just get on with it! It was about finding out the truth! Indeed these universities were founded originally on religious lines. We’re here to discover the nature of god’s creation, and lies, therefore blasphemy!

Now it’s been suggested by Simon Baron Cohen that you have an extreme male brain, which is basically autistic and focused on systematizing, and therefore essentially low in agreeableness and low in conscientiousness. And sort of quite the high testosterone they inter-correlate. That’s the male brain. High in systematizing, but blind to empathy.

And the female brain is very high in empathy, but system blind. So what the female is concerned about is not truth! It’s not systematic, you know, understanding the world. There are things that are more important than truth! Like everyone getting along, and being happy, and feeling validated, and all that.

Woes: Yes, of course.

Ed Dutton: But it is inimicable to what the genius does, which is the search for truth! And so if you have a society where women are allowed into higher education, then eventually you’re going to get the distinction between the genius who’s going to be outlier intelligent, but socially awkward, and, you know, crap to work with, and whatever. And the “head girl” type! The type who runs Finland. The straight A’s pupil at school, who’s very reasonably intelligent, but not outlier intelligent. And who’s very conscientious, and very hard at work, …

Woes: Very conformist!

Ed Dutton: Socially skilled, and conformist, absolutely conformist! Women are higher in conformism than men. Much higher conformism than men! Because they’re higher in agreeableness and higher in conscientiousness. And so who’s going to get the job, if you’re put up with a genius and someone like that? Well, obviously it’s going to be the woman that’s going to get the job, who would you like to work with?

And so, then original ideas, and originality, and new ideas, and whatever goes! And the whole spirit of academia that it’s to do with coming up with original ideas, and challenging convention, and whatever, you know, come what may, is suppressed, in favor of the new model of university as a kind of nursery school. Where everyone’s a winner, and everyone has to be happy, and whatever.

And eventually once the women make up about 20 of an organization, it starts to tip towards them and their values start to take over. And so the values of academia which is the pursuit of the truth no matter what, which is the genius strategy, that where you find out things, that goes!

And so you have a society dominated by women and all these things that would have happened, you know, things that, … We’ll think of all the inventions that have come about. Rockets! If people think we’ll have died in the attempt to get to the moon. All of this wouldn’t happen, because you have women in charge and women are averse to these things and they want everyone, …

[36:25]

Woes: Yeah, absolutely! And so modern academia is a very conformist space which specializes in enforcing a consensus! And adopting it. I mean, I did a video just for the sake of plugging here, I did a video back at the very start, 2014, called “How Feminism Killed the Space Age”. And it was basically making this point. That once you have women in charge of things there is going to be less innovation. And there’s going to be less, because women are less interested in things that aren’t immediately useful. I think that men have an ability to get, …

And they also have something called I would call “random curiosity”. I did a video with that title as well. Where I was making that point. That men can be fascinated by things which are not immediately relevant, or useful! But which end up being extremely relevant and useful. And I think that difference alone means that an academia dominated by women is going to be much less intellectually curious. Which is exactly what we see now!

[37:26]

Ed Dutton: Precisely! So that’s downstream of the destruction of patriarchy. And what that does to ethnocentrism. That’s the next problem.

Now the next problem then is that a lot of these women are, of course, adapted to patriarchy — most women are adapted to some extent to patriarchy — undermine the patriarchy and undermine the religious system. And what you get is this free-for-all that we now have. What they promote, these feminists, is not just feminism, but it’s this broader undermining of the traditional system a and what that does is it undermines group selectiveness, …

Woes: Just before you continue, there’s one thing that just occurred to me that I think (((Germane Greer))) actually said that:

“If women had been in charge all along, we would still be living in caves.”

I think that there’s a quote from Germane Greer about this. Let me just see if I can find it. But it’s basically backing up what you and I are saying here. Let me see if I can see it. Yeah, I don’t know, I can’t find it now. But anyway I’m pretty sure that even Germane Greer is on our side on this.

Ed Dutton: I wouldn’t be at all surprised. And by the way, she has this fast life history strategy background. She was beaten up by her parents, and things. She confesses to this.

So the downwind of that then, the next thing you get is the general Leftism of these feminists. So it’s undermining patriarchy. It’s undermining traditional values, promoting things like anti-natalism, and whatever. Being a feminist, as with the witches of yore, being a feminist and being a left-wing woman, of course, is associated with being mentally ill.

Why? Because it’s a reflection of general mutational load. And also having high levels of depression tends to be associated with being individualistic, and self-interested, and just everything’s bad! Everything’s awful! And having just a negative view of the world. And then the next thing that becomes. The problem is that it creates this arms race of virtue signaling. Where you have to move on to the next group, and the next group, and the next group.

And under normal conditions women are more religious than men. And they’re adapted to patriarchy, and they’re more religious than men. And this makes them more Right-wing and more conservative than men.

If you undermine the religiosity, if you undermine the patriarchy, which directs the women, because the women remember are evolved to be directed, they are evolved to not make decisions for themselves, but to make their fathers make decisions, or their husbands make the decisions. Then, of course, they become completely maladaptive. More so than men. And this is what you see.

So once the religiousness collapses and the religion itself stops being a protective force. They are more religious than men, but it becomes this left-wing deracinated religion of just pathological altruism! Of generalized altruism which means they’re highly in favor of immigration and stuff like that. And they make these very maladaptive decisions, which involve lots and lots of not having any children, and things like this.

Furthermore it may be the case that women are literally selected to be less ethnocentric than men, because under prehistoric conditions, it would be the women that would be abducted and taken away by other tribes, and raped by them, and whatever. And so if they could be less ethnocentric then they would be more likely to survive.

That may also be why women are better at learning languages than men, perhaps.

[40:52]

Woes: And then they’re also more social. I mean, they need language in a more immediate ways than, …

Ed Dutton: Yeah. And then the next thing is the issue of transsexuality. Which I think is absolutely fascinating! So you then move on to the next minority group, you know, this constant empathy, this constant desire, this female desire to constantly help the unfortunate, and help the marginalized and whatever.

And then you end up with the issue of transsexuality. Now I think that it associates with this sort of stuff in the sense that it’s like. I mean, it’s kind of demonic! It’s basically telling us that, … It says in the Bible:

“The devil is the father of lies.”

And it’s basically telling us that “lies are truth” and “truth is lies”. The purpose is to make us in a situation where there’s no structure, there’s no order! In religious terms:

“God decides what you are. God is the source of ultimate truth. And god says you’re a man. God says you’re a woman. Jesus says I am the way the truth and the light. God is truth. There is objective truth. God is truth! And the only person who is his own truth is God!”

And what these transsexuals are saying is:

“If I say I am something then I am that!”

And in that sense they are saying:

“I am God!”

And so that you could argue that like the devil, they are literally a fallen angel that is challenging God! And I look at this in the book, and it’s worse than that! If you look at these things about titles. Who is it that we give a special pronoun to? It’s god! God gets a capital “H”. Who is it that demands their own pronouns? And to have different say what my pronoun is? Transsexuals! And who is it that says to you:

“Look, this is how I have to be addressed! I have to be addressed like this. And if you cheek me I will banish you!”

The monarch! Who is it that asserts:

“Oh, I have to be addressed in this way. And that’s what you have to do! And I want sanctions if you don’t!”

Transsexuals! So it strikes me that there is something kind of demonic about this. To humiliate people, and to just grind them into the dirt and say:

“There’s no meaning! There’s no nothing! There’s nothing! It’s this is just hell! There’s no meaning! There’s no logic! There’s no nothing! There’s nothing! It’s just about power! It’s about power! And you bow down to me! Bow down to me! And if I say I’m a man, I’m a man! If I say a woman, I’m a woman! And it’s power!”

And that’s either saying you’re god, or it’s something demonic, as far as I can see. I don’t literally believe in these. I’m saying that’s how you can interpret it.

[43:55]

Woes: Yeah. And it does say, … I think Roger Scrutton might have made this point as well. That when he saw Leftists rioting in 1968 in Paris, it was as if they were wanting to be “God”. They wanted to take control of, to have power over everything. He made some vague point in that direction which I’m completely misquoting it, but that was the broad point that he was making.

And apparently it was Camille Paglia who said that about, … It wasn’t Germane Greer, by the way, earlier on. People are correcting me.

Ed Dutton: Oh I see.

Woes: Yeah, go on.

Ed Dutton: No, I was just going to say that what you have, it’s quite interesting this, what you have with these transsexuals, if you want to understand what’s going on. Transexuality is strongly associated with autism.

And it’s also strongly associated with being masculinized. I did a paper on this recently. It’s one of the only papers that’s got like an immediate complaint, demanding, saying it should never have passed peer review. And it should never have been published. And that was published by the journal. And that was written, of course, by a trans-woman. A trans-women academic.

And what they are saying is all of these markers of being masculinized, associated with being a trans-woman. So trans-women, that’s male to female transsexuals, are more masculinized, psychologically and physically, than the average man. Now this is fascinating!

Now what that means, autism is an expression — of which is low empathy, high systematizing, whatever — is an expression of being of masculinization! So people that are high in autistic traits tend to be more masculine. So that’s consistent with that.

Now what you get with autism, is you get a limited sense of self! So the sense of who you are, a sense of having:

“This is me. And this is who I am. And this is my place in the world.”

Doesn’t develop properly. And it doesn’t develop properly, because autistics don’t pick up on social cues very well. And they’re easily overwhelmed by stimuli. And so they feel that they’re in a world of sort of chaos, and that they’re not in control of things. And so they feel almost separate from themselves. Almost like they’re watching their lives pan out. And they have no control over it. Which is why some autistic people will refer to themselves in the third person, and things like this.

And so, that’s what that that then is associated with what’s called borderline personality disorder. Which is when you have a fundamental lack of self and your world is chaos. And there’s this void at the heart of you. And you deal with that, …

[46:32]

Woes: And this is usually women who have borderline disorder, …

Ed Dutton: That is more likely to be women. And you deal with this — it’s also present in men — and you deal with this by creating a separate sort of personality, or something like a black and White clear sense of structure that gives gives life meaning and whatever. But that can be unstable and sometimes that will break down and you’ll flip to the opposite, the exact opposite of it.

You see that in religious converts. And you see that in even in the Alt-Right. People that go from being far Left, being far Right, to being Christian fundamentalists, to being whatever. You see people like this.

Now one thing that’s parallel, that’s very similar to borderline personality, is perhaps an example of it, is narcissistic personality. And this is much more common among men.

Woes: Yeah.

Ed Dutton: Because the way you deal with your chaos and your void at the heart of your life, is to create a very, very, you know, superior sense of self. You decide that you’re better than others, and whatever.

But you also need to have this, others need to tell you that’s the case, others need to worship you, and whatever so that you’re reassured that you are, in fact, brilliant! And when they fail to do that, indeed when they do something which questions your sense of self, or questions the dogmas which you believe in and, because you believe in them you’re brilliant, and whatever, … When those are questioned by them, this can trigger narcissistic rage!

Because you can realize that this will undermine everything, and you will be confronted with the hell and the nothing that you are! And so you can see that you’ve got these two things. Narcissism, which goes together with a limited sense of self, which goes together with borderline personality.

So another thing that’s associated with autism is sexual fetishes! Autistics, and masculine men in general, are focused on things! So a man will say:

“I’m a breast man!”

Or:

“I’m an ass man!”

And what a fetish is, is that taken to a kind of extremes. You could only get it up if there’s a nice pair of tits, or whatever! And these fetishes can then become things that are associated with sexual things, that aren’t actually sexual. Like, I don’t know, people that want to like leather [?], or something like that. And these are more common among autistics.

Now, this all comes together in the trans sexual according to the research by Blanchard. Because the transsexual is a narcissist! Transsexuals are high narcissism. And the transsexual fetish is that he is sexually aroused by the idea of himself as a woman!

[49:22]

Woes: Oh my god! This is like in Silence of the Lambs!:

“Would you fuck me? I’d fuck me! I’d fuck me hard!”

Buffalo Bill.

Ed Dutton: Right! Well, that’s what we’re talking about. They are sexually aroused by the idea of themselves as women! There’s a small minority where, yeah, it is true, they are intersexual, or whatever. But in general that’s what we’re talking about. They’re sexually aroused by the idea of themselves as a woman.

And why would that be the case? Well, because they’re narcissistic. And so what you would expect then, if they’re narcissistic, is they would demand that society accepts them as women. And they would demand! And they would get narcissistic rage and go bonkers, if people question them, which they do! They’d be very aggressive, because they’re very masculinized, and indeed they’re narcissistic.

And I think we shouldn’t even call them these, … What do we call them? Transgender, … We should just call them “trans-narcissists”! That’s what they are.

And so what is the devil? What is the narcissist? The narcissist is the person that thinks he’s god. And so that’s what these people kind of think they are.

And so I think it’s extremely dangerous! These people are seriously mentally ill! They are a danger to society. They’re narcissists, they’re capable of narcissistic rage and all that entails. And the idea that they should be given equal rights, or something, is insane!

Woes: Mmm.

Ed Dutton: And this I also look at in the book. That this feminism, this witchcraft, just takes us down to the bowels of hell.

Woes: Well, indeed! There is a dizzying array of personality disorders that one can encounter in life. And I think that a lot of us, … I certainly wasn’t familiar with it until maybe a couple of years ago. And yeah, they are very dangerous and destructive people.

I think it would be useful if you were to talk about, … You know, you were saying earlier about witches being anti-social, causing problems in the community, and so on. Could you go into some examples, or just detail about that? What would it be that they were doing?

Let me just preface this. Women are capable of social degree of social intelligence that I think often completely eludes men. And so they can do things, they can set things up, that really take men by surprise! I think women are very good at that. And so there are all sorts of subtle small things that could be set up by malicious women which then have devastating effects for the community.

Would you like to talk about this?

[51:52]

Ed Dutton: So in the book I look at examples from the 17th century, which was the height of the witch craze. And so it’s things like:

“Oh. Yeah, she put a spell on my cow and the cow died.”

Probably she poisoned the cow. So nasty things like this. Babies! Killing babies was a big thing that they were often accused of killing other people’s babies. And so it may have been that kind of behavior. You know, you get these nurses, what was her name, this case recently? There were case in the early 90s of a nurse killing babies and whatever.

Woes: Yeah.

Ed Dutton: And there’s that. And you have them just cursing people, and with a society that believed in the power of the curse, they believed in the power of the curse! People believed this:

“And they told me, now I curse you! I hope you’re infertile!”

And whatever. So they engaged in what you would call the “nocebo effect”. It’s the opposite of the “placebo effect”. And it can be extremely powerful! If you believe in the nocebo effect, then it can make you infertile if you really believe it. And these people did believe it. They believed in the power of the witch’s curse. And people would identify as witches, they’d be known as witches, and they cursed people.

Woes: That’s the power of suggestion.

Ed Dutton: So exactly. I mean, there was a case of a known witch. A little girl, she was about 16 years old, and she was walking past — this is about 1610 — and she was in a Pendle, in Yorkshire, Lancastershire is it? And she was walking past this guy called John Laws. And she asked him to give her some pins. And he wouldn’t give her any pins — which we used to hold clothes together — so she cursed him! And he immediately fell down and had a stroke. And then she admitted. She felt really guilty at what she’d done, and she admitted:

“I cursed him, and I did this!”

And they hanged her. And so, that’s the kind of thing they would engage in. Deeply anti-social, nasty behavior, which for people at the time, was very serious! And was taken very, very seriously, and had, as far as they could see, serious consequences. So that’s what we’re talking about.

And what do these feminists do now? They engaged anti-social behavior. They sit behind keyboards telling you I hope your children get killed in a car accident! You know, they smash up public, …

Woes: Yeah. And another thing that feminists do, and you see this in public life now, is they specialize in destroying men’s character!

Ed Dutton: Oh yeah! That judge that Trump appointed. Some Scottish, Irishy sounding name. And the moment he was appointed.

Woes: Kavanaugh!

Ed Dutton: Kavanaugh, right. And all of these women, some of them were ugly, frankly, who had dated him in the past, suddenly came forward after 30 years, or 40 years:

“Oh! He raped me! Touched me up!”

And you had this hysteria of all these women, one after the other, coming forward. Because this person had dumped them basically, or refused to have sex with them, or something. And so they had borne a grudge, as women do, for a very, very, very long time! And they had seen this person get into a position of power and success. And the resentment that they felt, they wanted to bring him down.

And these would, perhaps, be the kind of women that would have rape fantasies. That would have fantasies that he raped them. And that would deal with the feeling of humiliation of being scorned, by concocting this! I mean, we know that the nature of memory is such that it’s highly inaccurate. And you will tend to literally alter your memories to make you seem good at any given time.

And so you can see how one way you would do that is, if you get dumped by a girl and you alter the memory to:

“Oh well it was a mutual thing, or whatever.”

And you might genuinely believe that. And you can see how fast life history strategy women would have rape fantasies and things. And if it made them feel better that they had those, they would genuinely believe it happened:

“Yeah, I wasn’t dumped by this guy, because I’m ghastly. He dumped me but it was good that he dumped me, because he raped me.”

And all of this came out! And none of the allegations went to court, because they were for sure, they were all false. And so you get this in the wake of divorces, as well. I mean, women can concoct all kinds of things:

“He hit me!”

You know. And it turns out that she’s exaggerating, or whatever. And so, yeah, I think that’s the damage that some, a lot of modern feminists do. That’s why it’s so dangerous to have this idea in British courts, they should automatically be taken seriously. Automatically. No! I would say quite opposite!

Woes: Believe women, and so on. Yeah, it is very dangerous! I mean, obviously men are capable of all sorts of crimes, of course, they are. And they’re also capable of deluding themselves. But I think that women seem to have, especially when encouraged by society, women have an ability to believe whatever is necessary. Now obviously I’m not saying all women do this, or whatever. I just think it seems to be something that’s more, …

Ed Dutton: If you think about the kind of person that is high in empathy. We talk about multiculturalism and it being inconsistent. Of course, it’s inconsistent to say:

“Race is a social construct.”

And then to say:

“Oh! We need more black people to donate their organs, because black people are dying, because there’s no black donor organs.”

Well that shows that racism isn’t a social construct, clearly. That shows it maps onto something very important indeed. And they could hold together this, they’re like the Queen of Hearts from Alice. They can hold together two contradictory things! It doesn’t matter to them! Because there’s things that are more important. There’s power! Power is more important! So they can engage in practical nihilism. And they can:

“Oh yeah! Oh, when it’s race! Oh well there’s no clear borders!”

And whatever. Where’s anything else there is. Or when it’s race there’s no clear borders when I’m arguing with a racist. But when I want money, then:

“Yeah, race exists, it’s very real!”

Woes: Of course!

Ed Dutton: You can’t be racial! That’s a complete contradiction. But they don’t care about that, because what they care about is power, or empathy! That’s the other thing, you know, you give someone a logical reasonable argument, and the response of an extreme female type woman who traditionally would perhaps be quite patriarchal, would be:

“Oh, that’s just so mean! It’s so mean!”

Yeah, but it’s true. And it’s true! Woes is Scottish.:

“Yeah, but it’s so mean to say he’s Scottish! Scottish isn’t generous. It’s so mean to say he’s Scottish!”

Or whatever.:

“And the Scottish are run by Wee Jimmy Krankie*. And so, that’s fine! It’s fine.”

[*The Krankies are a Scottish comedy duo who enjoyed success as a cabaret act in the 1970s and on television in the 1980s. The joke is that SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon looks like Wee Jimmy Krankie – the pantomime, red-capped schoolboy figure played by the Glasgow comic Janette Tough — a female absurdly pretending to be male.]

And so you see what I mean? So that’s why it’s so dangerous in terms of academia, in terms of science, in terms of what I’m interested in, to allow women to overwhelm academia. I’m not saying there shouldn’t be any women in academia. But when they started it at Oxford they brought in women, and it was found that it interfered with the ability to have harsh academic disputation. And then they reduced the numbers. And they said there could only be one woman to every seven men. Because they took the view that it wasn’t working. And eventually, of course, they overturned that and they brought them in.

I remember talking to an academic, a British academic, who working in Finland. And they have a thing here called a “Phd defense”. Now, it’s meant to be a formality. And you’ve got them having a party arranged in the next room, I think called “karanka”, and whatever. But as far as he was concerned the thesis that he was presented with, was not very good. And it was the first time he’d done one of these. You’re meant to have an opponent. And the idea is the opponent, you know, pulls apart your thesis and you defend it.

Now that’s what happens in a British, … Well, if you’ve ever had a Phd viva*, it’s private though. But you’ve got your internal, I had one. You’ve got your internal examiner, your external examiner. And their purpose is to rip your thesis apart! And your purpose is to defend it.

[*The PhD viva examination, or thesis defence, represents the culmination of the PhD examination process, and how you perform at it can determine whether or not you are successful overall.].

And this is being criticized increasingly because, of course, you end up with, if a girl has presented a thesis that only just passes, or whatever, or it’s not very good, then they’ll end up in tears! Because the people are being mean. And this is what happened at this defense.

The guy was expecting — he’d never done it before — he was expecting an academic disputation. It was a female Phd student and he basically just pulled it apart. And she was almost crying! And he couldn’t believe it! And people said to him afterwards:

“I think you were maybe a little bit too much, too harsh.”

And he’s like:

“What do you mean, a little bit too harsh? I was presenting her with the problems with her thesis. And I was asking for her response. What do you mean?”

Woes: And, of course, if it was a person who was committed to the truth no matter what, they wouldn’t really care about their own, they would separate their own feelings from the matter at hand, from the mission, as it were.

[61:10]

Ed Dutton: That’s right! But a lot of women I think like Jill Biden, or whatever they don’t get PhDs as a means of knowing more about the nature of the world. They get PhDs, because it’s a tick on the good girl picture on the fridge. [Woes laughs]

Woes: All right. Somebody makes the comment — this is when we were talking about society, stability, women, witches, and so on — and someone said:

“So it’s all women’s fault then?”

What would you say about that?

Ed Dutton: No. Maybe you could argue that it’s men’s fault for not standing up against this nonsense. And a lot of the spiteful mutants that have undermined the patriarchy and have undermined the traditional system have been men! So it’s not “all” women’s fault. No. But I’m just showing you the parallel is very, very clear, as far as I can see, between the witches of yore and the feminists now.

Woes: Okay. We have some Superchats:

“We’d love to know Ed’s thoughts on Gnosticism. Would it be a preferable Christian alternative for us well?”

Ed Dutton: Well, in the early church, so Gnosticism was this sort of esoteric belief system where you sort of gain greater knowledge through your own esoteric belief, you get closer to Christ. And I think that in the early church they were very unhappy about Gnosticism, because it was so subjective and whatever. And so it would break down into all kinds of infighting and things like this. And so then eventually the Gnostics were sort of wiped out. They were considered an element that, as it were, didn’t help in the matter of group selection.

So I’m not sure, … I was writing about Gnosticism quite recently. I’m just trying to find the document. Here it is. So I’m just trying to remember what it was they were unhappy about with Gnosticism. But they had these various Gnostic sects, but they didn’t get the balance right.

So one of the things was that they were extremely sort of generally pro-social, rather than ethnocentric. And so that was potentially a problem. Or they believed in all kinds of weird stuff which meant, which wasn’t in line with the broader church. And so that meant there was splitting and disagreement. And so that was a problem.

For example, Marcion — the blasphemous heretic Marcion — preached that the jewish god had created the world, but that a higher god had sent Jesus to the world. And there were some of them that believed that the Sethians, that Seth in Genesis was the receiver of crucial revelations and was kind of a divine savior.

The Ophites believed that Jesus instructed them to worship the serpent from Genesis, because he was the genuine source of knowledge. And so a lot of these things weren’t even particularly Christian at all. They involve sexual rituals and stuff like that.

So, no. I’m not sure that there would be a great deal of future. A lot of these Gnostic sects were not particularly ethnocentric. And I think that was why they got rid of them in the end. They weren’t ethnocentric enough!

They were promoting a “brotherhood of man” to a greater extent. And so they were selected out! There was basically an evolutionary battle of different ideas that were expressed in religious terms. And it was the Gnostic ones that were selected out. So I suppose not then.

[64:32]

Woes: All rights another Superchat. I don’t know what this is referring to, but he says:

“Ed, I had a fat Norwegian Forest Cat that lived to be 18.”

I’m not sure if this is a reference, …

Ed Dutton: He’s referring to my cat, Margaret the cat.

Woes: Oh yeah and he says:

“How is Margaret doing?”

Ed Dutton: I’ll just see if Margaret’s around. Just a minute.

Woes: Okay!

Ed Dutton: She’s been she’s been great, because the kids have been in northern Lapland, at a place called Keviarde [sp] for the last few days. And so they haven’t been here to stress Margaret out! And so she’s been a completely different cat. I mean, she’s been sociable. She’s been upstairs with us and just like not the anti-social cow that she normally is! And she’s been spayed, which I believe extends their life expectancy. And she’s 12, she’s 13, I think it is now. She’s 13. So yeah, so I think she could live quite a lot. She’s a moggy, but to the extent that she’s anything, she does look a bit like a Norwegian Forest Cat, that is true.

Woes: All right they look very nice and fluffy, and cuddly.

Ed Dutton: Very fluffy very, very furry! Very luxurious looking!

Woes: Okay [chuckling]. All right:

“Hi Ed! Why are the Ulster Scots so fiercely loyalist and pro-Britain, while Scots in Scotland seem to be slowly edging in the direction of abolishing the union, Great Britain? Why are people who are so similar ethnically beginning to diverge so drastically in their political expressions?”

Ed Dutton: So I think that there’s two reasons.

One is that it’s just the basic political reason, that the Ulster Scots are Protestant. And therefore they see themselves they are different from the Catholics religiously. And they are different from the Catholics ethnically, genetically.

And so they want to remain, obviously that it’s a choice between being part of a Catholic — and they’re deeply committed religious people — and that it’s a choice between being part of a Catholic Ireland, or a religious Catholic Ireland, or historically it was, and a choice of being part of Britain. And so it would be humiliation for them to be part of Ireland. And so therefore they are very, very pro, being part of Britain.

Secondly I think you’ve got to understand that the Ulster Scots are not representative of the Scots. Any more than the English people of Virginia, or the English people of Massachusetts are representative of the English. These immigrants tend to be more religious. And immigration is correlated with religiousness. They were very religious people they are under group selection more harshly, because of violence, or whatever in Ulster. So they’re highly, highly, highly, highly religious! They’re a fundamentalist community. And therefore they tend to be very conservative against change, and whatever. And therefore you would expect them to want to stay part of Britain.

Whereas the Scots, they’ve not been subject to that. So they’re going to be the religiousness and traditionalism and whatever is going to be less of an issue. And the nationalism element as well is going to be higher.

What is it that’s holding, used to hold things together? What held nations together? Group selection, the threat of destruction. Well that’s gone. There’s no Russia. There’s not gonna be a nuclear war. That’s under check. So we’d expect things to fall apart. We’d expect the European Union to fall apart. We’d expect Britain to fall apart.

Britain came together, because of war with other European countries, and stayed together, because there was something in it for the Scots. The Scots were dominant in the Empire. They were hugely overrepresented in the Empire, and indeed in geniuses, in British geniuses. I mean, pretty much a tiny population. I suspect they were more intelligent than us until quite recently, because they were under harsh Darwinian selection pressures. They were better at killing their witches, and so on. So they had every reason to be part of the union.

Whereas then you have this moving apart. And so therefore you have this rise in Scottish nationalism which has happened in Scotland. Their sense of national identity becomes wrapped up in their religiousness in a way:

“We’re better than the British, because we’re more left-wing!”

And that’s kind of what their Scottish nationalism is:

“We’re better than the English, because we’re more the sanats [?]. Because we’re more woke than them. Even though we can afford to be more woke, because we’re like 98% White!”

And so, that’s why those are the reasons why I think there’s a difference.

And also you should remember that the Ulster Scots and Scots diverged a very long time ago. I mean, we’re talking the 1600s here, early 1700s at the latest. And the people that emigrate they’re always more conservative.

The Afrikaans are more, even the language is more conservative. I suspect that the way the northern Irish speak is probably how the Scots spoke in the 1600s. And it’s just been preserved. Like we know that the way that the Cornish spoke in the 1600s is the way Virginians speak now. And the way that the Dutch spoke in the 1600s is the way Afrikaans speak now.

I mean, they like your “I”. The Scots people saying “aye” for “yes”. That’s a very old word. It’s died out in England. There’s some people say in Scotland. In Northern Ireland they love it! They can’t get enough of it! “Ayeee” all the time! And so on. So I think that’s my answer.

[70:01]

Woes: All right. Thank you. Okay. So Mr Dutton, Professor Dutton:

“Is removing female equality that was established into Western law in 1920 for most Anglo nations, the Right solution for a nationalist and traditionalist to aim to achieve? Removing female equality that was established in law in 1920?”

Ed Dutton: Who asked this?

Woes: Someone who’s constantly asking questions about women. [laughing] He says he’s not a MGTOW! But yeah:

“It’s time to grow and learn.”

Ed Dutton: I don’t see what, I don’t know what he’s talking about. Female equality was put into law in 1920? I’d dispute that. What do you mean?

I mean, in England, for example, women were allowed to become priests in 1992. Women weren’t allowed to engage in boxing until the late 90s. Women couldn’t be bishops in England until relatively recently.

Woes: I think he meant, I think he means a more legal level.

Ed Dutton: Does he mean, in America women got the Right to vote in 1920. Is that what he means?

Woes: I’m guessing, so yeah.

Ed Dutton: Right. So interestingly there was a very interesting book by a chap called Simon Webb, who I interviewed on my channel, and he showed that these women that wanted the vote, when the women’s social and political union broke down, a lot of them joined the British Union of Fascists.

So they were attracted to these, … Again this is what we talked about earlier, borderline personality disorder. They were just attracted to these extreme things. And Emmeline Pankhurst argued at a trial that 80 percent of English men had syphilis, and would go mad! And in order to save the English race from destruction women had to be allowed to take over England!

Anyway, that aside, what the vote for women initially brought about was greater conservatism, because in that time we lived in a conservative society, women were more religious than men. And so women were more inclined to vote for Right-wing parties than men.

And this flipped in the generation born in the 50s, and 60s, because this is when the religious society broke down. If you want to think a year it was probably 1963.

“Sex came rather late for me in 1963.”

Somewhere between the end of the Chatterly ban*, the Beatles first LP, and Kennedy, and all that.

[In 1960 Lady Chatterley’s Lover sold out all over England. Penguin’s first run of the controversial novel by DH Lawrence — a total of 200,000 copies — sold out on the first day of publication. The sexually explicit novel was published in Italy in 1928 and in Paris the following year. It was banned in the UK].

And so then women start to become more liberal than men. And now women are more inclined to vote for the Left than men.

So yeah! If you want to restore order then there has to be less female influence.

[72:42]

I mean, the damage! Think about the damage to children, as well. When I was at school, at my infant school, it was a hundred percent female. Okay, that’s fair enough. What kind of man would want to work at infant school other than a nonce? But at my junior school it was only two male teachers. And at my secondary school, okay that was probably majority male. But this is decreasingly the case.

Now about 60% even of secondary school teachers of women. And so it’s turning schools into female spaces! Where you have these different values like harm avoidance and equality. That’s female values. And male values, authority, and structure, and loyalty, and things like that. And that means you aspire for something. And it means that you see life as a struggle, which it is.

And so I think women dominating education doesn’t prepare people for life! And you just get these people that aren’t properly brought up.

I mean, I had a paper published recently on corporal punishment. We found that controlling for other factors like genetics, and whatever, corporal punishment has positive outcomes. But the feminization of education means it’s gone, no punishment anymore. And so you have a generation now that has no corporal punishment at school, no fear at school basically. Like we had in the 80s.

And so, yeah. I think the influence is ultimately too much, it’s too strong, it’s destroying academia, it’s destroying education. You’re getting boys that aren’t being taught with boys. That are being taught it’s bad to be a boy! You shouldn’t be a boy. So they’re going to become depressed, and maladapted, and developed sub-optimally.

And the only people that are going to be resistant to this barrage of maladaptive, environmental, pressure are those that are strongly genetically resistant to it, i.e., the remnant normal population! That would have survived, that would have been around in the 1600s, or whatever, before Darwinian conditions broke down. I think that’s what quite a few of us are! We’re the remnant normal population.

And so what I suspect is going to happen is that eventually all those people that aren’t the remnant normal population will die out. They’ll just won’t pass on their genes. And what you’ll be left with — and the data is consistent with this — is the people that we now call the “far-Right”, that’s who’s breeding, that’s what predicts breeding. A hundred years from now that’s what will be left, or less than a hundred years from now. And so things will change radically.

But yeah, the one way you could check it would be the abolition of higher education for women. That’s one thing that’s been suggested, or the limiting of it, or something like that. I mean, like this thing Jill Biden with a Phd, you know, education, it just undermines the value of it, because it becomes “woman’s work”. It’s like being a secretary.

Woes: Yeah, okay. Somebody’s asked:

“You explained earlier about the psychology of people who have rape fantasies. Do you have any insight into the increasing prevalence of incest porn in society?”

Fucking hell!

[76:00]

Ed Dutton: There’s been a couple of books on this. So there was one called “A Billion Wicked Thoughts”. And there was one that I did a video on. I can’t remember what it is, what the video was. It was quite recently I did a video that drew upon this book.

Yeah, what I would suspect is that what you get if you have no Darwinian, very, very limited Darwinian selection pressure, so lots of mutants, who will have maladaptive sexual desires that would have been selected out under harsh Darwinian conditions.

And so people who would want to bang their brother, or something, that those kind of people would be selected out. And people did. I mean, Egyptian royalty, ancient Egyptian royalty used to used to have sex with their siblings. They would be selected out, because of the consequences of that in terms of dysgenics. And so you would expect therefore this to spread.

Secondly at the environmental level you would traditionally have had a conservative religious system, which would make all this taboo, to the point of unthinkable! But now that is gone. And so you have free access to pornography, and free access to like increasingly aberrant taboo, or formally taboo practices. And so once you’ve moved away from “vanilla”, and once you’ve gone, … You can see how if you’re particularly into porn:

“Let’s go on to the next revolting thing! And the next revolting!”

And eventually you need some, … And there was research on this as well. That a lot of the zoomer generation that have had access to porn all their lives, they can’t get it up to the “vanilla” porn.

Woes: Yes. That has to get ever more extreme.

Ed Dutton: They’re immune to that. It has to be extreme! Whereas if you go back to Victorian times people could get up, if there was a bare ankle! Because they were so unused to nudity. And this is actually quite important. If you think that we have evolved basically, we Westerners, to a society where people are covered up. And so when nudity is something, … Not perhaps Finns. I mean, they’re into sauna and stuff.

But we British perhaps, to a society where people are covered up. And so you would expect us to be easily aroused by nudity. Now people that are fast like history strategists, of course, they’re involved with society doing any aberrant stuff. And so they would need more, and more, extreme things. Nudity’s not good enough in these fast life history societies. Women walk around naked, who cares with nudity. So you need more, and more, and more! And you eventually end up with more, and more, sick stuff. And incest porn would potentially be one.

I mean, it should also be noted there’s something called the “Westermark Effect”. Finnish anthropologist Edward Westermark. And he found that, … Kibbutz’s have shown this. That if people are separated at birth, you know, let’s say twins, a brother and a sister, or father and a daughter, and they’re not raised together in early life, then they will meet later and be deeply sexually attracted to each other. Because we tend to be sexually attracted to genetic similarity.

And so if someone’s 50% the same as you, and you haven’t been brought up with them in early life. And then you meet them later, then you’ll be very attracted to them. And this is a serious problem.

So yeah, that’s how I would explain the rise of incest porn. And there’s things that are much more. I mean, there’s sex with animals.

Woes: Yeah. On that note, I remember reading about two people who met and they very attracted each other. And then it turned out that they were both from sperm donors, and they had the same father. So they were half siblings.

[79:48]

Ed Dutton: And that would make sense. Because the sweet spot is third cousin. There’s research from Iceland. Of course, there’s only three hundred thousand people there. So everyone’s related. And the sweet spot in terms of fertility and not getting divorced, is third cousin. So the person you should marry is your third cousin, or equivalent.

So that is to say 1.5 percent above the baseline of the society, in terms of how related you are. And that seems that’s what slow life strategists do, because you select people that are similar to you. Because if you’re similar to each other you’re going to get on better, and you’re going to indirectly pass on more of your genes and whatever.

And so people who are slower life strategists do tend to be attracted to people that are more genetically similar to themselves. And that’s true. But in extremis you could see if they didn’t know they’re brother and sister, you could see, of course, they’re gonna be attracted, because they’re 50% the same.

Woes: Right. Okay, …

Ed Dutton: What?

Woes: Just the questions! All right:

“Why do some relatively inbred groups have high IQ? Icelanders and Ashkenazi jews, for example.”

Ed Dutton: Well in the case of the Ashkenazi jews it can be argued that, … So there’s two ways of understanding this. You have inbreeding depression, which is that if you have a child with someone that’s very similar to you, then there’ll be double doses of harmful genes. And so, that’s bad.

But there’s also out-breeding depression, which is that if you have sex someone that’s very dissimilar to you, then genes which haven’t combined, alleles that haven’t combined for a very long time, will combine, which in polygenic traits will have unpredictable results. So that’s bad!

But you could also have inbreeding vigor! Which is that if you inbreed then it will elevate positive traits. And you could have out-breeding vigor. And so there’s no reason why it can’t be the case. If you’re a highly intelligent subgroup and you want to make, …

This is what you see with the Indian caste system — inbreeding vigor. So they make sure that someone is relatively similar then, whom they marry, and they keep the highest castes highly intelligent, and whatever. That’s what they’re doing. Inbreeding vigor!

If they didn’t do it, then the men would just go for stupid, but pretty women. And the women might go for, you know, well off butch idiots. What’s that wrestler called? John Cena. People like him.

So that’s the problem. So you can be positive. And that’s what you have with the Ashkenazi jews. The Ashkenazi jews were pushed into a situation where they could only engage in certain professions [I don’t think this is substantially true. See Andrew Joyce on this.]. And this meant that if you couldn’t, if you weren’t intelligent enough to engage in that profession, then you would you couldn’t really marry out.

And so you just die out, and not pass on your genes. And so this heavily selected for intelligence. And it meant that if you marry other Ashkenazi jews, rather than who is of your family, or similar to you, you know, then you’re ensuring as an intelligent person you’re marrying someone else that’s intelligent. And so you get inbreeding vigor!

The flip side of it can be, of course, certain genetic disorders, being prevalent among them. And interestingly there was a theory by Henry Harpending, and somebody else, that some of those Tay Sachs, and some of these jewish disorders, are actually correlated with intelligence. So if you have, you know, one of the alleles, one of the mutant alleles, then you are very, very clever. If you have two then you get Tay Sachs. So the inbreeding vigour continues, and it stays in the population.

As for the Icelandic, I would say, you have must remember that until relatively recently cousin marriage was quite high. Parts of Sicily, and whatever, used to have in the 60s even very high levels of cousin marriage. So marrying people that are quite similar to you, … I mean, in Finland, for example, … In England we’re all 12th cousins. So we English are all related if you go back about 500 years, or 400 years.

In Finland you’ve only got to go back about 250 years, 300 years, everyone’s related. So even in Finland you’ve got people that are, perhaps without knowing it, marrying their third cousins, and stuff like this. And with the Icelandic, it’s just an extension of that. They were under very harsh levels of selection. And so you would expect very high levels of intelligence to be selected for. And that’s what’s happened.

So it is a problem though. There is actually an a in Iceland where you can type in the name of this boy, or girl, you want to go out with. And you can see how related you are. Because they’re all at least, they’re all like no less than fifth cousins. They’re all highly related.

Woes: Right.

Ed Dutton: And most people they marry their third cousin.

Woes: All right. Somebody asks:

“What mating strategy should Incels adopt?”

And that’s from someone calling himself Patrick Bateman! [laughing]

Ed Dutton: So it depends. I get the impression that what Incels are, are failed fast life history strategists. So they want to have lots of sex and be promiscuous, and stuff like that, and not commit. That’s what they want to do, and they can’t. Because in a situation where women are liberated and where women have power and control, then the women will just go for the alpha males. And the beta males, the women that are sluts, I mean, will just go for the alpha males, and the beta males won’t get much of a look in.

So what I would suspect the Incels need to do, is to go for the slower life history strategy females and be content with monogamy. And then at least they won’t be celibate. But I don’t think that’s what they want. I think that, I get the impression they want to compete to be alpha males. So that’s, that.

Woes: So it’s kind of all, or nothing for them.

Ed Dutton: Yeah.

Woes: Perhaps. Okay, someone asks:

“Ed, you previously mentioned the Irish score higher in extroversion. Which European ethnic group scores highest in introversion?”

[86:01]

Ed Dutton: It’s very hard to have exact measures of this. Because if you give somebody a personality test and they will compare themselves to people they know. And so you end up with this insane situation where if you compare international averages on personality tests Nigerians are higher in conscientiousness than the like Japanese. Which is insane!

So you can’t use personality tests. You can use them within a nation. But you can’t use them between nations. So based on proxies it’s, as far as I can see, it’s the Finns. The Finns are the lowest in extroversion, based on various proxies.

Woes: Well, they’re famously unsocial, aren’t they? There’s a sort of national joke about that. They like to keep to themselves.

Ed Dutton: Yeah! A pissed [drunk] Finn behaves kind of like, you and me are behaving now.

Woes: All right! [chuckling] Okay! All right. So in a related to that, the same person asks are there any measurable trait differences between Eastern and Western Europeans?

Ed Dutton: Well, if we regard the Finns as Eastern Europeans, then yes. They are lower in extroversion. There is a so-called J-curve of alcoholism which goes across north down, through Eastern Europe. And they tend to be more, the sort of Urgeric type people, this includes the Hungarians and even people in Slovenia. And they tend to be more prone to suicide. And in contact with alcohol particularly, suicide and depression, and things like this. Latvia, and Estonia, Hungary, Slovenia.

So that’s a known difference for some Eastern European groups. That there’s propensity alcoholism, and that it associates with suicidality and depression, and things like that. So that’s a known difference.

Woes: All right. Here’s a very good question:

“Is it psychologically healthier to be a jack-of-all-trades, or a specialist?”

Ed Dutton: Psychologically healthier? So you mean, …

Woes: Well, there’s more to that. I should read the whole thing:

“How does it affect the dynamic between insectoid European people, and all-rounder non-European people?”

I don’t know, let’s concentrate in the first bit:

“Is it psychologically healthier to be a jack-of-all-trades, or a specialist?”

Ed Dutton: Well, you will tend to have psychological health if you are (a), if you are of high status within your group. This makes people happy and undepressed and whatever, if they feel that they’re reasonably successful. And in Western societies normally the way you become successful is by being a specialist. That’s how you become successful. You specialize and you find a niche.

But, on the other hand, those that have a sort of easy attitude to life, that just live for the now and don’t care and are happy anyway, those people won’t tend to work hard, they won’t tend to specialize. And they’ll be quite content to be a generalist, that switches jobs, and they won’t worry.

But I think in general people are happier if they have high status, and it is specializing in a Western society that gives you high status. So that’s the first thing. Specializing is more important the more complex the society is. So if it is a complex society like ours, it’s much more important to specialize, and it’ll be much more important for social status that you specialize, that you find a niche.

Whereas in more easier societies everyone does the same sort of job, whatever. There’s less of a need to specialize.

[90:05]

Woes: Okay. So it’s conducive towards social status.

Ed Dutton: It’s conducive to a social status to specialize. So people want social status. And so people, and that’s associated with if you’re saying “contentedness”.

The other thing that’s associated with contentedness is an “evolutionary match”. So if you’re in an evolutionary mismatch, you know, like an elephant living in a cold place, or whatever. You will be unhappy. And that’s why we’re increasingly unhappy in the West, because we’re in an evolutionary mismatch! We’re not supposed to live like this. We’re meant to live in small communities where we know everybody. And they’re all genetically similar to us. That’s what makes us happy. That’s what we want.

Woes: Right!

Ed Dutton: And so we’re in an evolutionary mismatch! Immigration, people different, that is an extreme evolutionary mismatch! Being surrounded by ugly buildings is an evolutionary mismatch. Lack of religiosity, evolutionary mismatch.

So if you are the kind of person that is sort of fast life history strategist, or whatever, or happy go lucky type, and you’re lazy, or something, your evolutionary match may well be to be a generalist. And you will be unhappy if you are compelled to be a specialist.

So it depends on the kind of person you are. Maybe your evolutionary match is to be a generalist. So there’s different dynamics to the question.

Woes: Okay. It’s impossible to answer the question really, because it’s depends, it varies from one individual to the next. Okay:

“It’s one thing to prove that women are a negative influence when empowered in society, but quite another to offer a solution. Do you have any suggestions about how we can push back female influence?”

That is quite another thing indeed. And I don’t think it’s fair to ask the person who diagnoses the problem to also have a solution to it. But Ed is there anything you would want to say about this?

Ed Dutton: Well to the extent that you can do anything you need the promotion of a more conservative society. And once that starts to happen then you can more rationally present the evidence, and it is true that women are happier. And they are happier, because it’s an evolutionary mismatch! Remember, that’s what makes you unhappy.

The evolutionary match for most women is to be what they’ve always been. That’s what their happiest being. They’re happier, and they show this. If you look at the research by Joanna Williams on this. They show this, even if they get jobs. They want to retire early. They want to have a work life balance. They want to spend ages off work and be with the kids. That’s what they want to do!

To the extent they go into jobs, they go into jobs where they’re caring about people, and looking after people, and basically doing the kind of jobs which they always did even when they could work. It’s just that now they’re teaching boys and girls, whereas historically they’d just be teaching girls. And that’s what they do! That’s what they want to do! That’s what makes them happy. And you might get a few, and that’s interesting that when they have a real choice which they do in very feminist type societies like us.

Woes: Like Sweden.

Ed Dutton: Right! Whereas in Italy, or whatever, where there’s less choice they feel more of pressure, you know, because they need to make money, or something. They may feel more of a pressure to go into the sciences, which they don’t like doing! And they’re not very good at! And they ruin when they do go into it, because they don’t like, …

The kind of person that will come up with brilliant and original ideas, is the kind of person that will be autistic, and is therefore the kind of person that will make inappropriate jokes, and offend people, like Alexander Stromio — who I’m gonna have on my show next year — and whatever. And they’ll drive those people out! As they tried to do with him.

And so it’s bad for society that women, … We talk about how can we encourage more women to go into STEM subjects. No! How can we encourage women to NOT go into STEM subjects? [Woes chuckles] How can we encourage women to not go into STEM subjects?

Woes: Okay:

“Which European nation has the optimal level of in-group preference, not too high leading to a backward, or violent society, not too low, where they’ll be taken advantage of by hostile outgroups?”

[94:33]

Ed Dutton: European, … By the way, I’m perfectly happy with women to be involved in STEM subjects of a certain kind. Probably religious women, actually. Margaret Thatcher went into STEM subject. Highly religious, patriarchal, conservative women go into STEM subjects, and invent ice cream! [Woes smiles]

But with regards to that question, probably one of the Eastern European nations. It’s hard to say which, because the Eastern Europe is going the way of Western Europe, very slowly. There’s some evidence there is a backlash as well happening. There’s some very based stuff happening in Poland and Hungary, and whatever. But it is also, I think it will polarize very strongly. I think that’s what’s happening. But it’ll polarize.

We are polarizing now in a situation where the Left are culturally in power and the Right are not. And there’s this polarization, and it’s increasingly obvious. And eventually I think it will result in a tip back towards the Right. It may be that the Eastern Europe polarizes with the Right in power, and the Left not. I don’t know what’s going to happen.

But one of those kind of countries, probably has the optimum balance, somewhere like, … I would have said Finland 15 years ago. But now Finland has fallen to the “spite girls”. But probably one of those kind of countries, Hungary, or something like that.

Woes: Okay.:

“Professor Dutton, please consider Dr Andrew Joyce, Dr MacDonald, or Dr Johnson on one of your future shows.”

[96:01]

Ed Dutton: Well I’ve had Kevin MacDonald on my show twice. I don’t know how many other more times I can, … You’ll find that show on BitChute. Two of them, both those shows BitChute. And who are the others?

Woes: Dr Andrew Joyce and Dr Greg Johnson.

Ed Dutton: Andrew Joyce and Greg Johnson, right.

Woes: Okay. And someone else asks:

“Are people from the British isles predisposed to violent behavior? When I’m in mainland Europe, I don’t see half as many fights as I do in England.”

Ed Dutton: Possibly. I can think of two things. First of all, we industrialized earlier. And so if we industrialized earlier than anybody else, we’re going to be more dysgenic than everybody else. And also we were reasonably large population anywhere. But we’re more dysgenic.

And all of the religious people left, went to America. And so what you’re going to end up with is just the violent scum. And that’s quite possible, actually, that we would be more dysgenic. That’s certainly we were more dysgenic. That’s possible.

Secondly that we are a temperance culture. So this is something to do with being in the north, and also coming to farming relatively late by European standards.

So once you get farming, then you get the development of alcohol. Once you get the development of alcohol, it’s adaptive to be able to drink alcohol and not get drunk, or not get alcoholic, or whatever. Because then you don’t have to drink the water. And as you get a more complex society the water is going to be dirty and whatever. And so as farming spreads the genes resistant to alcoholism spread.

Now farming was founded in the Fertile Crescent ten thousand years ago. And so we’ve had the Spanish, and the Greeks, and the Italians, and the southern Europeans, have had much longer for the genes to spread. So therefore they’re completely resistant to alcohol. They don’t particularly like it. They don’t drink it much. They drink it only with meals. They have very low levels of alcoholism. And when they go out on a Friday night, they get dressed up in nice clothes, and go out on vespers and talk very loudly in cafes! That’s their Friday night.

Whereas our Friday night, because we are less resistant to alcohol there is a critical mass of people that are very attracted to alcohol and get drunk, and whatever. And very easily become alcoholics, and whatever. And become violent. And that may well be the reason for the difference.

Woes: All right. One last question:

“The genetic basis of your claim of today’s pervasiveness of witches is underpinned by the hypothesis that mutations leading to infant mortality also affect pro, or antisocial behavior.”

Ed Dutton: Not really.

Woes: And he said:

“Is there evidence for that?”

[99:00]

Ed Dutton: Well yeah, there’s evidence that with the collapse of, … That infant mortality is the crucible of evolution. There’s a paper on that called “Infant Mortality”, or something like that. It’s called something like “The Crucible of Evolution”, and looks at this.

And so there is certainly evidence of a rise in mutational load. There is evidence that physical mutations are correlated with anti-social mental problems, like schizophrenia, depression, autism, whatever. And violence psychopathology. It correlates with these mutations. So in that sense, yes! There is evidence for that. That physical mutation correlates with mental mutation, and mental mutation in a maladaptive, anti-social, direction.

One thing I’d add actually, about transsexuality. Being a transsexual correlates with hereditary deafness! And all kinds of other things as well. Crohn’s disease, asthma, whatever. Now you could put some of these things down to stress of being a transsexual, or something. But I can’t see how you could put deafness down to it. Curvature of the spine.

I was at university with this guy, Alex, who then became Drea, and then worked as a prostitute in Brighton and was murdered by a Scottish Sky Television fitter. Who he told he used to be a man. I probably told you that story. But he had some kind of appalling series of problems that they had to like operate on his anus, and things like this. Like all these hereditary mutations. And that would be consistent with narcissism, all these physical problems that correlate with narcissism, with mental problems, that are anti-social.

Woes: It’s not the kind of thing you want to hear about while you’re fitting someone’s Sky Television box!

Ed Dutton: Well no, he went there — he was a Sky fitter who went there to fit Alex’s box. And then I get the impression that Alex must have said, …

He [Sky guy] might even have said something like [putting on a Scottish accent]:

“You have very nice breastees, don’t you? Have very nice breasts, they’re very perfect!”

And then Alex would have said [in a soft feminine voice]:

“Oh. Yeah, they would be really nice, because I was born a man. So they’re fake.”

And then he saw red, and strangled him!

Woes: Bloody hell! Okay [chuckling]. There’s a very strange story! Okay. So that’s that question. And then we’ve just got the “diamonds” on Dlive. Someone says:

“Good to see Dr Dutton on Dlive. Thanks as always.”

And someone else said:

“Hail Woes! Hail Ed! Hail Scrubs!”

I’m not really sure what the term “Scrubs” refers to. But I’ve heard it’s associated with Dangerfield, and so on, so all right.

Well, excellent! It’s been very interesting stream. I hope that people have enjoyed it.

So would you like to summarize, just before we finish, could you summarize the theory about witches and anti-social behavior and the fall of civilization again? Just so that we can end the stream on a summary of that theory.

Ed Dutton: So the summary of the theory is that what witches are, in evolutionary terms, is people who are undermined patriarchy, the patriarchal system in various ways. And that was bad, because at the group selection level patriarchy was associated with maintaining positive and negative ethnocentrism, and maintaining religiousness, which is all associated with winning in the battle of group selection. So that’s what these witches are doing. They’re undermining patriarchy!

And that’s what modern day witches do. They undermine patriarchy. And it’s the same. They’re functionally the same. And so we must understand that we are living in a society that is dominated by literal witches! And that is not good!

And as I say that the book should be coming out later this year, “Witches, Feminism and the Fall of the West”.

Woes: You mean next year, 2021?

Ed Dutton: Next year. And yeah, I should plug my channel, shouldn’t I? Jolly Heretic, Online public house, live stream Mondays and Thursdays, seven pm UK time, two pm New York. And various books you can get if you look into it. So yeah, that’s it.

Woes: All right! Well excellent! Well, thank you Professor Edward Dutton, The Jolly Heretic, for taking part in Millennial 2020.

Ed Dutton: Thank you for having me.

Woes: Okay. I’ll be back in 15 minutes with John Bruce Leonard. In the meantime hope you enjoyed this. Thank you to everyone for watching. And I’ll see you later. Bye for now.

[103:50]

END

============================================

PDF Notes

* Total words = 17,982
* Total images = 6
* Total A4 pages =

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB):

(Available later)

Version History

Version 7: Mar 11, 2021 — Added See Also image 2 and 4 links.

Version 6: Jan 20, 2021 — Added last 23 mins of transcript. Transcript now complete = 104/104 mins.

Version 5: Jan 18, 2021 — Added 19 more mins of transcript. Total transcript complete = 80/104 mins.

Version 4: Jan 17, 2021 — Added 9 more mins of transcript. Total transcript complete = 61/104 mins.

Version 3: Jan 15, 2021 — Added 8 more mins of transcript. Total transcript complete = 52/104 mins.

Version 2: Jan 14, 2021 — Added 9 more mins of transcript. Total transcript complete = 46/104 mins.

Version 1: Jan 11, 2021 — Published post. Total transcript complete = 37/104 mins.

Luke Ford – JQ Debate with Age Of Treason – Mar 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

admin — Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:13:53 +0000

[Luke Ford, an Australian living in the USA, who “converted” to Judaism in 1993, interviews Tanstaafl from the Age of Treason blog on the subject of the Jewish Question, aka, Jewish Problem.

— KATANA]

_________________________

Watch the video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2laXMYmRAY

Luke Ford

Streamed live on Mar 27, 2018

http://lukeford.net/blog/?p=121133

Jonny Anomaly writes: On the alt-right, it has become fashionable over the last few years to recycle a trope from 1930s Germany: “The Jewish Question” (to which the Holocaust was supposed to be “The Final Solution”).

The contemporary version of the question concerns why Jews have so much influence in cognitively demanding occupations, including science, medicine, law, and politics. Although the “JQ” (as alt-righters call it) has a mundane answer, many subscribe to elaborate theories to account for the fact that most Jews don’t conform to the stereotype alt-righters expect them to.

For example, when a scholar documents the fact that 4 out of the 10 speakers at an inaugural white nationalist conference were Jewish, along with a vast array of other evidence that conflicts with alt-right dogma, the predictable response by people in the grip of an ideology is that Jews do this to create a smokescreen: it provides cover for all of the other Jews who plot against white nationalists.

http://age-of-treason.com/2018/03/27/…

http://age-of-treason.com/2018/03/19/…

https://www.researchgate.net/publicat…

http://quillette.com/2018/03/23/alt-r…

https://link.springer.com/article/10….

http://quillette.com/2018/03/15/alt-r…

Luke Ford

JQ Debate

with

Age of Treason

Published on Mar 28, 2018

TRANSCRIPT

(140 mins)

Introduction — Tanstaafl’s Journey on the JQ

A Personal Disclosure

The White Network

Consequences for Your Marriage?

Growing Up in New York

The jewish Grandfather

Hitler’s Struggle and Yours

On Circumcision

Reading MacDonald

Jewish Crypsis and Parasitism

On Finding Support

How Your Work Differs from Others

An Existential Threat

Mein Kampf and National Socialism

Jewish Crypsis — Spain and Portugual

Jewish Crypsis — Today

“In Your Face” jews and “Down-low” jews

Ford’s Critique of Critics of jews

Tan’s Response

Complicating Things as jewish Camouflage

Jewish Gaslighting

Ad Hominem — Cofnas vs MacDonald

Jewish Deception and Coverups

Cofnas’ Critique and Your Respect for MacDonald

Cofnas — MacDonald’s Evidence is Counter-evidence

Any Factual Errors in Cofnas’ Work?

Cofnas Call MacDonald a “Bad Person”

Jews “Didn’t Du Nuffin!”

Ford — So Criticism of Scholarship is a Personal Attack?

Cofnas — Worried About MacDonald’s Work

Cofnas Doesn’t Prove His Case

Ford — Does Cofnas Screech “Anti-semitism”?

I Always Write “Anti-semitism” with Sneer Quotes

Whites Have Not Taken Their Own Side Hard Enough

You are Arguing Like a jew, Luke!

Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy

Jews Marrying Non-jews

Ford — So anything jews Do is Group Evolutionary Strategy?

Jews Always Arguing About What’s Best for the jews!

“Jews are Not a Monolith” — A Silly Statement!

The Root of jewing is: “Is it Good for the jews?”

Culture of Critique’s Chapter 7 on Immigration

Open Borders for Israel is My Attitude

Jews Not Threatened in a Multi-ethnic Society

Jews and the Second World War

Being Evidence Based

School Shooting in Florida

Does MacDonald’s Model Have Predictive Value?

Jewish Out-Marriage One Half of the Parasitism

Whatever jews Do is Bad Because They are the Enemy!

Do White People Have Agency?

Luke, You’re Not Making Honest Valid Arguments

Would You Describe jews as Ethnocentric?

Jews Moralize to Whites to Convince Them That What is Good for Whites is Bad

Fifteen jewish Intellectuals

Whites Don’t Recognise That jews are at War with Them!

Jews Behaving as “Nazis”

Intersectional jewing — Where One jew Agenda Conflicts with Another jew Agenda

Intersectional jewing — Promoting Reich, Pinker and Cofnas as Being Against “anti-racist” jewing

Why are Whites Unable to Overcome the jews?

Super Chats — What Should White Guys Do to Spread Awareness of the JP?

Ford — Are You a Leader?

Comments — Are All jews In On It?

Comments — Is Monomania on the JQ Better Than White Improvement?

Do jews Control the Weather?

Comments — How are Whites to Speak on jew Influence Without “anti-semite’ Being Shrieked

Jews are the Enemy Whatever They Do?

Is Steve Miller Anti-White?

Are You an Unhappy Guy?

Things That Make You Happy?

Reflections on This Interview

What Does It Mean To Be a jew?

Ford’s Fundamental Misunderstanding of Judaism

Do You Believe in Universal Morality?

Ford’s Journey To judaism

A jew Told Ford That you Can’t Convert To judaism

Ford Hasn’t Fooled jews

On Ford Being Rejected By his Peers at School

Ford As Cover Article in “The jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles”

Lawrence Auster Admitted That jews were Responsible for Open Borders

On Ford’s Hatred of jewish Organizations That are for Open Borders

Ford — Do You Thinks I’m Delusional?

How Ford Can Help Whites by Blowing the Whistle on Jews

Introduction — Tanstaafl’s Journey on the JQ

top

Ford: Hey, I’m Luke Ford. I’m here with the Age of Treason blogger, Tanstaafl. Tan, you’ve been blogging for quite a long time. Tell me about your evolution, in particular on the JQ.

[background sound]

Tan: Sorry let me mute that.

Ford: And here with Tanstaafl*, so we are going to get that microphone problem taken care of, and then we are going to discuss Nathan Cofnas’ critique [of Kevin MacDonald’s book “The Culture of Critique”].. So Tan, take it away! Tell me when you started blogging. Tell me about the evolution of your journey on the JQ.

[* A pseudonym using the acronym for “There Ain’t No Such Thing As A Free Lunch“. The phrase and the acronym are central to Robert Heinlein’s 1966 science-fiction novel The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress.]

Tan: Right. I started in 2005. I started blogging, and that was after I had spent about twenty years, maybe, of not paying attention, being fed up with politics, mainstream politics, and ignoring it, focusing on my career. But in 2005, I think, it was Hurricane Katrina that triggered me, the racialization of that. It was sort of a “Trayvon Martin” experience that many people experienced years later. I experienced during the Katrina thing.

And so I started blogging. I had been talking to friends before that privately, and I just basically took it public. And moved through pretty quickly neo-conservative thought, which attracted me at first, because it seemed like a more serious approach to politics, than plain old conservative politics. And then I ran into someone named Lawrence Auster. You might be familiar with [him] — that might have been where I came across you.

And it was really Lawrence Auster, reading Lawrence Auster, that made me aware that there was something going on with the jews. Auster himself was a jew, was a convert to Christianity. But what I noticed over time with him was that he was hyper-sensitive to criticism of the Jews. He indulged in it himself, but it was always from the point of view of “What’s good for the jews?” He thought that the jews, in various ways, he criticized them for not doing what was best for themselves.

From there — let’s see, trying to run through it — there was Steve Sailer. I became interested in Jared Taylor. And this is where I don’t recall exactly when I came across Kevin MacDonald’s work, but it was somewhere in there. Probably, it might have been Lawrence Auster who mentioned MacDonald.

As I mentioned in my Cofnas piece, there were several other jews, later on, years later, that I noticed their allergic reaction to Kevin MacDonald. That they had a visceral negative reaction to MacDonald, that seemed irrational to me. But by that point, I was already aware of the jews, and aware of the harm they were causing.

[03:01]

Back when I was first paying attention to Lawrence Auster, I wasn’t so aware. And so it probably came across to me as:

“Oh! This guy is ‘bad think’. I shouldn’t pay attention to him!”

So, it was probably years later before I really started, actually reading and listening to what Kevin MacDonald had to say. This is about, I think it was 2007, when I came across Lawrence Auster, and started, over time, becoming critical of him. It was probably around 2009 that I started becoming critical of the jews explicitly. I made a post called, I think, “Committing the Most Mortal Sin”*, or something like that.

[* “Committing PC’s Most Mortal Sin”, Sep 28, 2007]

Because I still understood things from a very “politically correct” point of view. But I understood that I was violating the primary rule of political correctness, which is really, “semitical-correctness” which is, you know, it’s a jew Sharia.

I didn’t realize that at the time, but I knew instinctively that any criticism of the jews was radioactive. Was going to make me a radioactive person.

A Personal Disclosure

top

And then it was 2010, I think, that I realized that my wife, whose father was jewish, that this was something that was important. That, I mean, I realized it was important as soon as I started questioning the jews. But I realized it was important for me to be straight about that with people who were reading and interacting with me online. And so I divulged it.

I forget what I called that post. But, “A Personal Disclosure” I think is what I called it. And so, but I didn’t become less critical of the jews after that. I became more critical. I became more, I started to understand more about the history, and more about race.

[05:08]

The White Network

top

In 2012 through 2014, I partnered up with Carolyn Yeager and produced radio shows for The White Network. Which was a collaborative effort. And that ended in early 2014.

And then since then I continued podcasting for another year, maybe two, or year and a half, and then ultimately I petered out even with podcasting. And today I continue blogging, but at a reduced rate. So that’s where we are.

Ford: Now, it seems like there was some dark nights of the soul there in your journey, you must, I mean, particularly the personal disclosure.

Tan: That was one! That was hard to do. But I also felt better about doing it, because I had come clean about it. And from that point on I could talk honestly, basically. And it got darker later on when I realized just how deep this problem goes! I wouldn’t call it the “jewish Question”, it’s “the jewish Problem”! And it’s a big problem! And it’s been a big problem for a long, long, time. It’s an existential problem for White people.

And as I realized that, I realized I’m doomed personally! I, you know, no matter what I do. I’m compromised! So I’m not going to, … if White people survive I won’t! My line won’t! And if the jews win, likewise! I’m not going to join them. So, either way I’m screwed!

But that just freed me to keep digging and keep talking.

Consequences for Your Marriage?

top

Ford: What were the consequences for your marriage?

Tan: None! My wife, I have I am very frank with her. I talk with her about what I’m thinking, and she is well aware of why I think what I think. And she agrees with what I think.

She does not identify as a jew So she’s never had this visceral reaction as a jew that she’s just loses her cool about any criticism of jews. Her father was a full-blown jew, but married out. Married a woman who was not at all a jew. And was kind of the black sheep of his family for doing that. And died when my wife was only ten years old, so they never really gave her any indoctrination as a jew.

[07:55]

So, she’s never felt defensive about my criticism of the jews. And she identifies herself, you know, as being part White. She has sympathy for White people as well.

Ford: And have you had jewish friends?

Tan: In the past I have. There were people in school, at university, and people at work. But I never got along with them. They always struck me as odd people. I mean, from the time I was in grade school, in New York City, the jewish kids always struck me as different. And it wasn’t something I could put my finger on. But they were not the same as the Italian kids, or the Irish kids. So anyway, that’s all I thought of them.

Growing Up in New York

top

Ford: You grew up in New York, so it is that we had abundant real life experience with jews.

Tan: Not abundant. No, because I went to a private Catholic high school. I was in public school through junior high school, through eighth grade. And then when I went to high school, I went to a private high school. And it was a college preparatory high school, that’s why. And then I went to college, studied mathematics, computer science, and didn’t meet too many of them there, either.

It’s strange, the guys I did get to know well and become friends with, none of them were jews, my close circle of friends. That wasn’t a conscious thing, but it was just what happened. And there were people who were jewish. My wife who I met at that time in college, had jewish girlfriends. And there was a circle of jews, that in retrospect, I see that they all knew who the jews were and who the non jews were. And they were hyper aware of it! And there were several comments that in retrospect, once I became aware of jews as distinct and as an enemy, I started to realize that some of these things that they had said, should have clued me in! If I had been more aware I would have recognized them as being shit tests, or what’s the other word for it, just probes, you know.

[10:29]

The jewish Grandfather

top

I remember when I first met, I was well aware too that her father had been jewish, and when before we were going to get married, toward the end of school, I went and met her grandparents. It was funny, it was at a golf, country club that was jewish. I didn’t know that at the time, but in retrospect, again. And this old man, who was pleasant enough, nice guy to me, the grandfather. His friend came over, also an old man, an old jew. And he looked me head to toe, and he goes:

“Oh boy! It doesn’t get much more goy than this!”

[Ford laughs]

And I just thought:

“‘Goy’, what’s the hell is that?”

Even though I had been around them through grade school, and through college, I didn’t know the yiddish terms for things, including the word “goy”. So I just thought:

“Oh! Whatever!”

You know, I took it as in stride, because, well, this is my future grandfather-in-law, and this is one of his friends. So, I’m not going to take offense at that, even though I don’t know what it means.

But it was a test, basically. It was a probe! Is this kid, who I can see is a “Nazi”, basically, is he really a Nazi? Does he know he’s a Nazi? Does he know what jews are? How’s he going to react, if I poke him in the face, like this? And since I didn’t even know what he was talking about, I didn’t respond at all. Just sort of smiled stupidly, and went on with my life.

[11:56]

And it wasn’t until many years later, like I said, with reading Lawrence Auster, that I became aware of just how active jews were in politics. And then, of course, after my eyes were opened. Then I was able, in retrospect, to realize all of these things that had happened in the past politically, that I had been dimly aware of, it involved jews.

Things like Henry Kissinger being in the White House. Being, you know, one of the primary advisors to Richard Nixon. And, not so much with the Reagan, but, although now I know the details and the shadows behind him, there was definitely a jewish, a strong jewish hand. And lots of other things like that, that I only realized in retrospect.

Hitler’s Struggle and Yours

top

Ford: So Hitler struggled with his thinking about jews. He thought that most anti-semitism was primitive and stupid. He thought religious anti-semitism was stupid. He struggled for about ten years before he finally came down and said:

“The jews are not just a problem. But the problem!”

How long did you struggle?

Tan: About six months, maybe nine months. Once I had been exposed, … And something had set me up for that I feel, I didn’t mention, was that for a while as I think even before I became interested in what Lawrence Auster was saying. I was interested in what the counter jihad, or what I would call today the “jewhadis”. What they were saying critical of Islam, opened my eyes to criticizing non-Whites, criticizing non-Westerners. And seeing them do that, kind of laid out the steps that I was able to follow later, in saying:

“Well, why can’t the jews be criticized in the same way?”

And today I would realize and say that jews can be criticized in virtually every way that Muslims are criticized, jews can be criticized, just as well.

Ford: Yeah.

Tan: For the same things. I mean, for being outsiders, for having alien ways, for having negative attitudes toward their hosts. They go about it in different ways. There are different tactics that they use, the halal, the kosher. jew Sharia versus Muslim Sharia. Takkiya, the Muslims their code of being able to lie to infidels, and the jews basically have that dual morality, as well, that goes much deeper.

And so a lot of that research and time that I had spent reading and thinking up my own critiques of Muslims. I was very easily able to map it into, okay, well now do the same thing to jews. So that’s why it was partly, it was almost like a rubber band snapping in my head, once I realized that race was important.

Which had to do with a Muslim protest, it was some nationalists in Belgium, or something, were getting beaten by the cops. These were White cops beating White politicians that were anti-Muslim. It snapped in my head that this is crazy! That White people are beating each other up over aliens! And I realized that I’m a White man and I’m against this. This is insanity! And I wanted to understand it more. And it was several months later that I realized this has to do with the jews. This is all about the jews!

[15:29]

On Circumcision

top

Ford: Were you circumcised at birth?

Tan: I was. Yeah.

Ford: How do you feel about that?

Tan: I resent it. [Ford laughs] I’m angry about it! And I’m angry that it happens to other kids. In fact, my boys are circumcised, because I was not aware what it was all about, when that came up. It was like:

“Oh well, you know, you get circumcised”.

It’s just the thing that people do. I didn’t realize that there was a jewish aspect to it at all.

Reading MacDonald

top

Ford: So what was your first Kevin MacDonald book that you ever read?

Tan: I’ve never read any of have MacDonald’s books, cover to cover. I have all three of his major trilogy. But, what I’ve read of Kevin MacDonald are pieces here and there. I have Mein Kampf too! [laughing] But I’ve never read that cover to cover, either! I used to read voraciously. I have a bookshelf full of books that, by the time I became active on the internet I was doing almost all of my reading on the internet in electronic form. So I really had stopped reading books. And also I had lost interest in the kind of books I was reading. I used to read history of science, and science fiction type books.

So I’ve never read those books all the way through. But I’ve read the whole chapter on immigration, the chapter on, I think it was the Frankfurt School, he goes into. And there’s another one, Freud.

A lot of that I really dug into when I was doing the White Network podcasts. I was basically digging in-depth into every subject that was related to race and jews, for two, almost three years, I think. Every week, to put together a thirty minute summary of what I had learned.

Jewish Crypsis and Parasitism

top

And, you know, you were in one of those as well, probably around the middle of the body of podcasts that I did. I did a whole series on jewish crypsis. Which was inspired largely, … That’s one of the main things that I got from MacDonald, besides the jewish intellectual movements, was this idea of “crypsis”. Which I had never heard of before, but which fit into their behavior, and explained to me, … What I saw it was, was an element of what I later realized was “parasitism”. That it’s really the best way “biologically” to describe the relationship between jews and Whites is “parasitism”. They’re the parasites, and we’re the hosts.

[18:15]

On Finding Support

top

Ford: How did you find support during your journey into the JQ? Did you find it online, did you find it in real life?

Tan: I didn’t need any support. I didn’t feel the need for any support. I was basically curious about these things, curious enough to start blogging, and then, once I started blogging, I just kept following the bread crumbs back to where they led. I followed the dots. I connected the dots. And there were several places, I’ve already mentioned Auster, and Sailer, and there was a forum called “Majority Rights” that was important to me for a while. There were a group of people there that I thought were speaking the truth. They were, you know, arguing with each other, but that’s where a lot of Kevin MacDonald’s work and Lawrence Auster were criticized.

Think that’s pretty much it. Other than my own blog. And I had people coming to my blog criticizing me, and I would answer them. And I would, you know, do more research. I was a blogger for a long time, for several years, before I ever started podcasting, and now I’ve gone back to being more of a blogger than a podcaster.

[19:32]

How Your Work Differs from Others

top

Ford: So there are a lot of Alt-Right blogs, and there are a lot of JQ writings on-line. Could you tell me about the things that distinguish your work?

Tan: I don’t know. I lot of people have complimented me and said that I really “get it”, and that they don’t know of anyone who does a deeper, better job of it. And I’m proud of that. I like, … I’m pretty thorough, and I also think I’m pretty reasonable, maybe too reasonable. In fact, my criticism, and I have criticism for other people who have worked on this problem, is and for my race as a whole, is that we’ve been too reasonable! We’ve been too fair-minded!

And I try not to do that. I try not to be fair-minded. I try to be partisan. I take the side of White people, unashamedly, unabashedly, and unreservedly! Without any, you know, I’m not put off by people who call me names, or try to question my sanity, or call me stupid, or whatever.

The typical academic type, and I think of Kevin MacDonald, and Andrew Joyce as the two premier academic critics of jews. They seem, well, [laughing] I don’t to be too critical, because they have been very, very good! They are good. And their work is very, very, solid! But, at a certain point and intellect, somebody who puts stock in being seen, as somebody who’s, you know, smart, and intelligent, and makes well-reasoned arguments, I think puts too much stock in that. And so they are a little bit too affected by critics who try to get at them that way. That try to erode their confidence. And I think Andrew Joyce, in particular, has made great strides. He’s now much more of a “shit-lord”, at least on Twitter. And has taken more of a fighting attitude.

And MacDonald’s has moved along in the last few years and become more serious. Although even recently with this Cofnas thing, my criticism of him, is that he seemed a little too willing to — this has to do with his academic attitude and identity — of playing the game the way the jews want to play it.

An Existential Threat

top

And I’m not interested in playing the game. I’m interested in identifying the game that they’re playing! Calling it out, exposing it for what it is. And that it’s not really a game. To call it a game is wrong, because as I said, earlier on, it’s an existential threat! It’s a problem. It’s not a game, it’s not a question. And so, what I do, the work I do, the research I do, the summaries I provide of what I’ve learned, are aimed at White people to try and jump White people ahead of where I started. And to wake them up. To give them the information that they need.

And for that, I value what MacDonald did, even though I’m not an academic and I wouldn’t taken his approach, and I wouldn’t phrase certain things the way he does. His work is great, because of the way he did it. So I can respect it. But I can’t be that. I don’t think we necessarily need more academic work. Because it’s not a question, anymore. The question has pretty much been resolved. Every day you can go on Twitter and you can see the jewish journalists talking to each other in a way that we couldn’t see before, where they were able to talk privately. And now it’s in our face every day.

[23:54]

Mein Kampf and National Socialism

top

Ford: Do you differ in any way from the ideological foundations of Mein Kampf?

Tan: Well, I can’t say that, because I don’t know what the full thing is. I don’t understand entirely, the entirety of National Socialism. But from what I understand of National Socialism, I think Hitler was right. I think the National Socialists were right. And although the situation has changed since then, so there may be some things on which, you know, they’ve been proven insufficient, or that they didn’t address, or whatever that might have to be addressed. But in every experience that I’ve had in reading what is available to read of them — and this is another problem is that some of it was destroyed deliberately. It was obscured. So we’ll never really know what they, what it was all about.

[Image] A Short Sketch of His Life.

But from what I’ve looked into about it, they were definitely doing the right thing, the right way. And I don’t fault them for anything. Hitler did nothing wrong!

[Ford bursts out laughing]

And I don’t mean that ironically. I mean, that utterly soberly.

Ford: [happily amused] You know what is really cool about talking to you? You don’t use irony!

Tan: I hate sarcasm and irony.

Ford: Yeah! Yeah. It just makes, just makes it so much easier, just to talk to you. I mean, you’re not playing any games.

Tan: No I’m not.

Jewish Crypsis — Spain and Portugal

top

Ford: So, talk to me about “crypsis” and why this is a problem for White people.

[25:35]

Tan: Well it’s very important.

Crypsis is an indication of bad faith. Crypsis is the, just to describe it for people might not have heard of it before. It’s a biological thing, where a predator, or a parasite, will use camouflage to disguise themselves, in order to give them an advantage they may not otherwise have, over an organism that’s bigger, stronger, or has some other advantage. So crypsis is a tactic of warfare, or of competition, of biological competition.

And the jewish crypsis that MacDonald introduced me to was basically things like in Spain when there was the Reconquista* and the jews were compelled — I’m skipping a lot of history here — but they were compelled by the Spaniards who had reconquered their territory, to either convert to Christianity, or get out!

[* The Reconquista (Spanish and Portuguese for the “reconquest”) is a name used to describe the period in the history of the Iberian Peninsula of about 780 years between the Umayyad conquest of Hispania in 711 and the fall of the Nasrid kingdom of Granada to the expanding Christian kingdoms in 1492. The Reconquista was completed just before the Spanish discovery of the Americas—the “New World”—which ushered in the era of the Spanish and Portuguese colonial empires.
Source:https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconquista]

Probably equal numbers of them left, or converted to Christianity. But the conversion was insincere, as it had to be. Because, you know, jewishness is not what’s in your head so much, as it is what’s in your genes. It’s a biological, genetic trait. It’s not purely a religion. The religion comes into it, but it’s a amplifying effect. A reinforcing effect. It’s an adaptive, it’s a jewish “survival strategy” in Kevin MacDonald’s terms.

But in Spain — and what I found out is that this has happened many times, in many different places — those jews who had converted, they remained jews, they remained aware themselves as jews, they maintained their rituals, and they married within other [jews]. They were called “Marrano”*, those new Christians. Crypto jews. And this had a dramatic impact on how the New World unfolded. Especially south, in central and southern America.

[* Marranos, now considered an offensive term for which the academic term “crypto-Jews” substitutes, were jews living in Iberia who converted, or were forced to convert to Christianity yet continued to practice Judaism in secret. The term specifically refers to the accusation of Crypto-Judaism, whereas the term converso was used for the wider population of jewish converts to Catholicism whether, or not they secretly still practised jewish rites. Converts from both Judaism, or Islam were referred to by the even broader term “New Christians”.

The term “marrano” came into later use in 1492 with the Castilian Alhambra Decree, which outlawed the practice of Judaism in Spain and required all remaining jews to convert, or leave. By then, the large majority of jews in Spain had converted to Catholicism and conversos numbered hundreds of thousands. They remained under the watchful eye of the Spanish Inquisition subject to suspicions of secret practice of Judaism by formal Catholics, also known as “Marranism”.
Source: https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marrano]

There were times when “Portuguese” was a sort of slang term for “jew”, because there were so many Portuguese jews who had converted to Christianity and tried — basically didn’t like having to pretend, so they wanted to go to the New World, where they wouldn’t have to pretend. But although even there, they were still compelled to a certain extent, to pretend that they were Christians. This insincerity was noticed by the Christians. And this is something when you read jewish sources about all of this history that I’m recounting, it’s entirely from a jewish sympathetic point of view. That the poor jews were compelled to either leave, or convert.

But the fact is, that they could have left, if they really wanted to be honest about it. But they saw the advantage of sticking around, even to the point of having to pretend to be something that they weren’t. And that is really the crux of it! That this crypsis that jews do, it’s multifaceted, and it has to do with them not really wanting to change who they are, but wanting other people to think that they’re not jews!

[28:58]

Jewish Crypsis — Today

top

So in modern-day times, it’s things like, changing their name to something that doesn’t sound jewish. Getting plastic surgery, so that they don’t have the identifiably jewish face. Things like that. Not telling people that they’re jewish. This is very important, because when you, well from a very simple point of view, if you have a competition, you have two teams. And one team has players on the other team! And the other team doesn’t know it! Who do you think is going to win the competition? Who’s going to win the game?

This is very bad for Whites! And this is throughout history. I mean, when you’re talking in this debate between MacDonald and Cofnas about the harm that the jews have caused Whites, we don’t even know the half of it!

[30:00]

Because, an unknown amount of it was done without even being attributable to the jews! We don’t even know! And that’s part of what MacDonald’s “Culture of Critique” the third volume in the series. He focuses on this very damaging, very recent, in the last century, these aggressive movements that were identifiably jewish. But they were kind of playing games with identity. They were trying not to be identifiably jewish. They weren’t wearing their jewishness on their sleeves.

“In Your Face” jews, and “Down-low” jews

top

I distinguish between jews, two different branches of jews. I call them the “in your face jews” who openly identify themselves as jews. And then there’s the “down-low jews” that are basically engaging in crypsis, in one form, or another. They’re trying to pretend that they’re not jews. And there’s other facets, other ways you can see distinctions between jews, but that’s sort of one dimension of it.

And as an example you’ve got an organization like the ADL, which is “in your face jews”. Being jews, openly jews, and openly jewing! What they’re doing is openly pursuing jewish interests. But then you’ve got groups like the SPLC, that are supposedly not a jewish organization. They don’t identify themselves openly as jews. But they get a lot of their funding from jews. They get a lot of support from jews. They get support from the jewish media. And there are a lot of jews on the staff. So they follow basically the guide, or the line set down by the ADL.

And that’s the other thing, to mention the ADL and the SPLC, is that jews organize as a group. And [have] many, many, organizations. Whereas Whites have been brow beaten into thinking that’s basically bad! That’s racist! That’s being a Nazi! To organize, to even think about your own group and what’s best for your group is wrong!

[32:06]

Ford’s Critique of Critics of jews

top

Ford: Let me bounce off you my criticism of critics of jews, and you tell me if there’s any value in my critique.

Tan: Sure.

Ford: My critique of “Mein Kampf”, and probably most of the Alt-Right’s reaction to jews, is that they simple mindedly want a “magic key” to unlock history! So Hitler wanted a magic key to unlocking history! He thought he found it in jewish perfidity*, so he attributed Germany’s loss in World War one to the jews! For which there’s very little in empirical evidence. And so, most criticism of jews is that kind of simple-minded, conspiracy mongering. You know, what’s the “magic key” to unlock history, which is a childish desire that we can do a shortcut on understanding how the world works.

[* Backstabbing of World War I

The Backstabbing of World War I refers to the series of events which took place pertaining to Jewry and Germany during the First World War. It is commonly referred to in Jewish propaganda as the “Stab-in-the-back myth” (German: Dolchstoßlegende). Jews had encouraged and financed Prussian participation in the war, primarily as a means to destroy Russia which was then under Tsar Nicholas II and to insert Bolshevism in that country. Once the Russians had been defeated and signed the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, more Imperial German Army troops were freed up for the Western Front, with victory in sight, organised Jewry bribed the British Empire to turn the tide.

Source: https://en.rightpedia.info/w/Backstabbing_of_World_War_I]

Tan: It isn’t childish at all!

Ford: Okay.

Tan’s Response

top

Tan: There’s a principle called “Ockham’s Razor”. There’s a principle of science that sometimes critiqued, or criticised for being reductionist. That’s a term I’ve often heard applied to biology generally, or people who believe in science, or, …

But there’s no nothing childish about wanting to understand what is really the most important thing about a complex world. It’s one thing to, … And I consider myself a realistic person. I look at reality as it really exists. I’m not running away from complexity, but I am trying to identify what is really the power structure here? What is really going on here? And is it possible for it to happen?

And a lot of times, I’m led to investigate something, or I was curious about something, because it seemed impossible! It seemed, the analogy that I often think of, is like a boulder just floating in mid-air! Which doesn’t comport with how I understand reality is supposed to work! And when you see a boulder floating mid-air, or rolling uphill, there must be some force. Maybe that you don’t see. Some string holding up the boulder, or pushing it up the hill! But my goal has always been to find those forces and identify them. And this goes hand in hand with the jews trying to disguise what they do. It’s not an oversimplification to say, “It’s the jews!” Most of the time it’s true! The jews have a role in what’s going on.

Complicating Things as jewish Camouflage

top

Now, you know, Ken MacDonald uses the phrase, something like it’s a “necessary condition”. Which is kind of for mathematics. This distinction between “necessary” and “sufficient” conditions. But in plain English, sometimes things really are actually simple. And in the case of the jews they oftentimes try to make things more complicated than they are. They make things appear more complicated than they really are! They obfuscate. It’s part of the camouflage, it’s part of the crypsis to confuse the goyim.

Jewish Gaslighting

top

And then this is where “gaslighting” * comes in. The psychological effect of basically telling people:

“You’re crazy! The jews don’t have anything to do with this!”

It makes you question your own sanity. And that again is another, to me, it’s an indication of bad faith! They are not being honest!

[* Gaslighting is a form of manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or members of a group, hoping to make targets question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, it attempts to destabilize the target and delegitimize the target’s belief.

Instances may range from the denial by an abuser that previous abusive incidents ever occurred up to the staging of bizarre events by the abuser with the intention of disorienting the victim. The term owes its origin to a 1938 play Gas Light and its 1944 film adaptation. The term has been used in clinical and research literature, as well as in political commentary.

[Image] Ingrid Bergman in the 1944 film Gaslight

The term originates in the systematic psychological manipulation of a victim by the main character in the 1938 stage play Gas Light, known as Angel Street in the United States, and the film adaptations released in 1940 and 1944.In the story, a husband attempts to convince his wife and others that she is insane by manipulating small elements of their environment and insisting that she is mistaken, remembering things incorrectly, or delusional when she points out these changes. The original title stems from the dimming of the gas lights in the house that happened when the husband was using the gas lights in the attic while searching for hidden treasure. The wife accurately notices the dimming lights and discusses the phenomenon, but the husband insists that she just imagined a change in the level of illumination.

The term “gaslighting” has been used colloquially since the 1960s to describe efforts to manipulate someone’s perception of reality. In a 1980 book on child sexual abuse, Florence Rush summarized George Cukor’s Gaslight (1944) based on the play and wrote, “even today the word [gaslighting] is used to describe an attempt to destroy another’s perception of reality.“

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting

Also see: http://age-of-treason.com/?s=gaslighting

[35:41]

Ad Hominem — Cofnas vs MacDonald

top

In this thing with Nathan Cofnas, for instance, they got into a bit of a back and forth on “ad hominem”. MacDonald said I’m not going to address Cofnas’ ad hominem. Cofnas then countered, and said:

“Oh no! Kevin MacDonald is the one committing ad hominem! He called me, he said I’m doing what I’m doing, because I’m a jew!”

It’s important, you know, the fact that he’s a jew is important! And he’s basically trying to obscure that fact, and make it about some technical details, as if Kevin MacDonald did something wrong “technically” with his paper. If Kevin MacDonald had written a paper and had it published in a sociological journal, or had these textbooks considered sociology rather than evolutionary biology, or evolutionary psychology, there would be a lot less grounds for this “scientific criticism” of them, because sociology is all bull shit! It’s all just people’s opinion about what they think about what’s going on.

And it’s mostly jews criticising White people!

You know when Whites criticize jews it’s called “anti-semitism”, and when jews criticize Whites it’s called “sociology”, or “psychology”. They’ve set things up such that, they’re the authorities, they’re the experts, and they spew off all kinds of nonsense, all kinds of alternative explanations to keep us confused! And it’s really not so difficult. They are the enemy! It’s that simple! They don’t have our interests in mind. They have their own identity. They play games with:

“Who’s White?” “Who’s a jew?” “What does it mean anti-semitism?” “Everything is anti-semitism.”

You talk about simplification. Anytime you’re critical of even a single jew, that has anything to do with their jewishness, the defense is:

“Oh, that’s anti-semitism!”

They immediately turn it into a group thing! And every criticism of anything, I mean, you criticize Soros, criticize globalists, the jewish organizations come out and call it anti-semitism! Because they realize it is simple! They’ve got to defend! They’ve got to circle the wagons and defend themselves.

[37:57]

Ford: So my critique was, I thought it was childish to think that there’s a “magic key” to unlock history. And my summary of your answer now is, it’s not childish, it’s reality.

Tan: Yes. Yes.

Ford: That’s excellent! Yeah I mean, we really just boiled it down right there!

Tan: Yes, sorry I went on so long.

Ford: No, no! It was great! It was great! But I mean, that’s what it comes down to. I see you, not you personally, but your type of critique is childish. You know, there’s a magic key that unlocks history and that magic is jewish perfidity. And you say:

“No Luke! That jewish perfidity, that is real, and it is, if not, … “

You’d probably say it is the “key” to unlocking modern history in the Western world. Correct?

Tan: Yes.

Ford: I mean, that’s awesome! Like we’ve like boiled it down!

Jewish Deception and Coverups

top

Tan: Look, another way of putting it is that you can’t really understand what’s happened for the last two, three thousand years without accounting for what the jews have been up to. And my other point, that I mentioned even before we got into this, is that you can’t account for what the jews are doing, because they try to hide what they’re doing!

And it’s not just the act of hiding that they do, at the time they’re doing it. It’s the “after the fact” hiding. Sometimes they’ll come out and they’ll say:

“Oh yeah! We had a role in this!”

The secret jewish role in “Peeps”, was the latest article I saw on a Tablet, or Forward. And the secret jewish role in this, or that, is the kind of article they come up with on a regular basis! Revealing what their secret machinations were. Long after it’s safe to do that. But just as often they omit it from history. They blot it out, so that it’s never discussed. Their role in slavery, for instance, is one of those things that has been mostly blotted out.

[40:01]

Cofnas’ Critique and Your Respect for MacDonald

top

Ford: I’m thinking for a second.

Was your respect for Kevin MacDonald at all diminished by the Cofnas critique?

Tan: No! Not at all! It was raised! I thought his response was a bit wordy but then again he was trying to respond in academic fashion to a supposedly academic critique of his work, of his academic works. So he was staying in character. And he ultimately, I saw when he was talking to you, he realized that there was no substance to Cofnas’ critique. And so, he gets it. He knows.

I just wonder sometimes, some of the things he says, that whether he even understands the depth of what his own work implies? You know, I think have reduced it, or called it “an indictment of the jews” an “indictment of jewing”. He’s done a thorough job of documenting, quite enough. I mean, there’s plenty more that you could dig into in a similar fashion, and write book, after book, after book, about the things that they’ve been involved with — in the same fashion that a MacDonald, or Joyce [Andrew Joyce, a contributor to “The Occidental Observer“] would do. But at a certain point you don’t need to see any more of it! That’s why I never felt compelled that I had to read all three of his volumes, cover to cover. I read enough of it. Okay, I get it! I understand this.

Cofnas — MacDonald’s Evidence is Counter-evidence

top

Ford: So, it doesn’t bother you that Cofnas shows that the examples that MacDonald used to exemplify his Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy, were actually counter examples?

Tan: No. I didn’t think that they were counterexamples. I thought it was, first of all, he was trying to disprove something, a large number of examples that demonstrated basically a rule, by citing some exceptions to the rule. Rather than providing his own exhaustive list of counterexamples, which would have been a better way to go about it, if he was actually sincere in what he was trying to do.

But I thought, basically, his critique was: Here are some jews that I think aren’t jewing as well as I think, or the way I think, that they should be jewing! And so therefore that counters what Kevin MacDonald thinks about jewing, what he documented about jewing. It was a very weak, lame argument, from my point of view.

I’m biased, and unapologetically biased in favor of Whites! I think that, you know, MacDonald comes at it from a kind of “above it all” academic, you know, I’m going to be objective about this, I’m going to write a book. His first book about how the jews do their jewing. And I’m going to write a book about what the European reaction to that jewing was — “anti-semitism”.

[42:56]

And I don’t like the fact that throughout that volume he uses the term “anti-semitism” un-ironically, without, apparently, any awareness of the built-in anti-White, anti-European meaning that it’s loaded with. And then he wrote a third book where he basically laid it out as — in what I think is closer to the real partisan point of view of — these jews are warring on us! And he gave examples of these jewish intellectual movements that have been doing this in the past century, and that it predates “Mein Kampf”, it predates the rise of National Socialists in Germany.

See: Rethinking Mein Kampf by Thomas Dalton.

Ford: So you could you find any factual errors in what Nathan Cofnas wrote?

Any Factual Errors in Cofnas’ Work?

top

Tan: Factual errors? No, I didn’t have any factual errors that I found. Let me see, I wrote some notes here about the argument itself. You know, I went into lots of different points about his argument, my own critique of his critique.

Let’s see, I’ll just go through them here from the beginning.

Yeah, what I thought with the basic structure of Cofnas’ complaint was, that MacDonald is biased himself. And that he made mistakes, he made “scientificky” mistakes, and these logical mistakes, supposedly. The “cherry picking” and the, what was the other phrase that he used? I can’t recall now. I’ll get to it further down in the list here. “cherry picking” and “misrepresentation”. That he misrepresented sources.

Okay, but basically it all amounted to, he was trying to excuse the jews, Cofnas’ was. And he was trying to blame Kevin MacDonald for being biased and being a bad person, for even making these books critical of jews.

Ford: Can I stop you right there?

Tan: Yeah, sure.

Cofnas Calls MacDonald a “Bad Person”?

top

Ford: Thank you. Okay you just said he tried to accuse Kevin MacDonald of being a bad person. Can you read to me, or reference me where Cofnas does that, because I believe that your accusation is completely false.

[45:06]

Tan: It was more of an implication, than it was an outright, spelled out, accusation against MacDonald. It was in the way he phrased things. It was in the pieces that I snipped out and quoted in my blog post on it. I’m scrolling now to see it.

The terms like “cherry picking”, “misrepresenting sources”. And that he said that was, … he used a modifier and said, … made it sound like that’s all Kevin MacDonald’s work was! That he cited a few things that he said were the those things. But then he basically used that as an excuse to say that the whole work was that. And it wasn’t just that his original critique it was the Quilette piece that he did, that published it about the same time. It was in some of his statements he need to you then, on the podcast.

Ford: Okay, you said that Nathan Cofnas accused MacDonald of being a “bad person”, …

Tan: Yes!

Ford: I asked you for something to back that up, …

Tan: Yeah, let me read, …

Ford: … and you got to be honest, there is nothing in what Cofnas has written that says MacDonald’s a “bad person”. It says he does “bad scholarship”.

Tan: That’s my interpretation of it. That’s my characterization of it.

Ford: Well no, you can’t, … you need to, …

Tan: Sure I can! [laughing] Here’s a sentence toward the end of his conclusion. He says:

“But misrepresenting sources and distorting history are not part of the methods of evolutionary psychology, or any other legitimate academic discipline.”

He was implying with that, that Kevin MacDonald is not doing legitimate academic work. That he’s not a good evolutionary psychologist. And that his work is all about misrepresenting sources and distorting history! And that is, what I think Kevin MacDonald himself was referring to, when he said that was what he meant by Cofnas making ad hominem. And that was the part he was going to ignore in his own response to Cofnas.

[47:08]

Ford: Okay. I’m just going to boil down, in my own words, a synthesis of what I think you just said in response to my challenge. My understanding of your synthesis is that if one person criticizes a scholar for doing bad scholarship, they’re saying that, that scholar is a bad person. And I just think that’s a completely absurd accusation!

Tan: No! I think between academics that actually respect each other, and that are actually trying to do good academic work, that they are a lot more circumspect than Cofnas was. That they don’t just provide a couple of examples, and then say things, sweeping things, like he said. That MacDonald was misrepresenting sources and distorting history. They leave it for the reader to come to that conclusion on their own. They might hint at it. They are more circumspect.

And that’s partly why I’m not an academic, and I don’t take an academic approach, because I can’t control myself like that. I just want to say what I think about it.

Now MacDonald himself characterized it as “ad hominem”. That’s all I’m saying, is that it’s an attack against MacDonald. And I think it was an attack. MacDonald used the term properly, that it was basically an attempt to distract from the argument and focus it instead on the man. That the man himself did bad science, that was Cofnas’ basic claim!

Ford: Do you want to walk back your claim that Cofnas accused MacDonald of bing a bad person?

Tan: He didn’t literally say MacDonald is a bad person! But that was the thrust of his critique! Yeah, I stand by that.

Ford: [in a tone of disbelief] The thrust of the Nathan Cofnas’ critique is that Kevin MacDonald is a bad person!?

Jews “Didn’t Du Nuffin!”

top

Tan: Yes! And that the jews “didn’t du nuffin”! Yeah! That’s what I wrote in my blog post and I stand by that.

Ford: Okay.

Tan: From a twenty thousand foot level, that’s basically what was going on, from my point of view.

Ford — So Criticism of Scholarship is a Personal Attack?

top

Ford: So, from your point of view you can never criticize a scholar for making mistakes in a scholarship, without “that is a personal attack”? There’s just no separation? You criticize someones scholarship, that’s a personal attack.

Tan: It’s kind of interesting why you generalize it to any criticism of any scholar, any academic That’s not what I’m saying. I’m talking about this case of Cofnas versus MacDonald, That’s all I’m talking about. Not academics in general. And I think that’s what happened.

And I think when you criticize jews, generally the response is “Oh! That’s anti-semitism!” and that’s the end of the discussion! There is no Cofnas thing.

Now Cofnas is trying to follow the right channels, or at least put on the right appearance, that he’s making an academic critique of an academic work. And so he’s been very careful not to just screech “anti-semitism” about everything. And he’s been careful not to just say:

“Well, Kevin MacDonald is a stupid, crazy, evil monster, who wants to gas six million jews!”

He’s been careful not to do that. But it’s been a very careful thing that he’s done. And it shows. He is actually concerned about “anti-semitism”! He’s concerned about “what’s best for the jews”. And that’s what gets lost in this debate. The way I summarize it, from the twenty thousand foot level, is what’s really important about this. It’s a guy who says in his own paper. In the introduction. That he’s doing this, because he’s concerned about the negative consequences of not having been done yet!

Cofnas — Worried About MacDonald’s Work

top

And what are those negative consequences? It’s implied that there are negative consequences for jews! It’s resulting in, … MacDonald’s work appeals to “anti-semites”! What’s an “anti-semite”? Everybody just knows that it’s somebody that the jews don’t like! It’s painted as the opposite by the jews, that it’s somebody for irrational reasons, for childish reasons, hates the jews! And thinks that they will solve all the problems of the world if they just get rid of all the jews!

But that’s not exactly what’s going on. The main conflict, I thinks between the point of view! It’s not something you can just stand above and outside, and look at it objectively. White people, if they’ve done anything wrong the last two, three thousand years, it’s been to not take their side hard enough! And to allow the jews to take their own side to the detriment of Whites. And that’s something that, I’m not going to make that mistake!

[51:42]

Cofnas Doesn’t Prove His Case

top

Ford: Okay, so I read your blog post on Cofnas, and I asked you again tonight. You don’t have any factual errors in your critique.

Tan: Yes. Well here it is in the Quilette piece further on toward the bottom of my blog post. And to I get into more criticisms of Cofnas’ attack in the comments. But, just in the opening salvo, I said, I pointed out his conclusion toward the end of his “What the Alt-Right gets wrong about the jews” piece. He says:

“We don’t think MacDonald will be able to rescue his hypothesis. Built as it is on misrepresented sources and distortions.”

He didn’t prove that case. He didn’t even come close! And MacDonald got upset about this too, because he was just exasperated that the Cofnas had provided just a handful of examples and then declared, basically, all of his work “null and void”.

Ford — Does Cofnas Screech “Anti-semitism”?

top

Ford: Okay, You said a couple minutes ago that Cofnas did not just “screech anti-semitism”. Okay, is there anywhere where Cofnas “screeches anti-semitism”?

Tan: I think it was in the original piece.

Ford: So, in your original piece you’re saying he’s “screeching anti-semitism”

Tan: No he doesn’t! I said he doesn’t “screech anti-semitism”!

Ford: You said he doesn’t, … he could not just “screech anti-semitism”. So you’re saying he doesn’t “screech” at all?

Tan: He does appeal to the term “anti-semitism”. He includes them in his papers.

Ford: And does he accuse Kevin MacDonald of “anti-semitism”?

Tan: No, not directly.

Ford: Okay.

Tan: No, he does it indirectly by saying that what Kevin MacDonald writes, appeals to “anti-semites”. That it’s popular with “anti-semites”. And it begs the question, you know, what the hell is an “anti-semite”? And why are “anti-semites” like inherently wrong? What’s wrong with that? What’s wrong with being critical of jews? What’s wrong with opposing the jews for wanting to kill your people?

[53:37]

I Always Write “Anti-semitism” with Sneer Quotes

top

Ford: So, Cofnas doesn’t, …

Tan: No he doesn’t. But that is all packed into the word “anti-semitism”.

I always write the word “anti-semitism” with sneer quotes around, because I don’t accept the jewish definition of that term! I don’t accept that term! It’s just another word for jewing! It’s their word for when people react negatively to their jewing! They go “Oy Vey! Anti-semitism!”

And they expect, … it’s a two-pronged thing. It’s like a calling out for their own tribe to come and target this person. And it’s also serves, and I don’t think they intended to do this, but it has served, as basically, as a Pavlovian signal to the people so targeted, they start shaking in their boots, because they know what it means! Once you’re called an “anti-semite” your career is over! Generally. And that’s why people like me don’t even come out. And use my real name, you know. I don’t want to lose my job. But I do want to oppose this!

Ford: So are there any logical errors in Cofnas’ critique? And if you’re were just to pick one, which one would you, …?

Tan: I said no. Well actually, you know, that’s not quite right. “Logically” I did accuse him of a lie further on, having to do with the ad hominem thing. Let me see if I can scroll down to that.

[55:01]

Ford: Yeah, Cofnas says:

“I never made any ad hominem attack.”

And you say that’s a lie. So on what basis do you say that’s a lie? Well, I guess you’ve already answered that so people can decide for themselves.

Tan: People can read, … I urge people to read my blog post and the many comments that I made afterwards. He is maybe a strong word, because it implies that he is consciously telling an untruth and knowing it is. But, I’m not going to be charitable with jews.

Whites Have Not Taken Their Own Side Hard Enough

top

Ford: You said a little earlier:

“White people, if they have done anything wrong, it’s they haven’t taken their own side hard enough.”

Is that accurate?

Tan: Yes! Yes.

You are Arguing Like a jew, Luke!

top

Ford: So basically, you’re saying White people are the one people in the world who haven’t done anything wrong, beside from not taking their side hard enough?

Tan: Luke! I can’t understand how you can argue so well like a jew, since you’re not biologically a jew! That is how jews argue! If you argue that Whites are not one hundred percent responsible for what’s going on, it’s like, “well you think the jews are one hundred percent responsible!” It’s like, all, or nothing!

And that serves them very well, actually. That they don’t take any shit whatsoever! No criticism, whatsoever, is tolerable to them! And good for them! That’s the way, that’s adaptive behavior, from a biological point of view, at least until the point they piss people off that won’t take that any more!

But, no! You’re putting words in my mouth!

[56:33]

Ford: No, no, wait! You didn’t say that White people, if they have done anything wrong, they haven’t sufficiently taken their own side?

Tan: That’s my main criticism of Whites as a group. Yeah, historically speaking.

Ford: So I didn’t invent your words? I accurately quoted back your words.

Tan: No! You said that it implies somehow that I think that White people aren’t to blame for anything.

Ford: Yeah!

Tan: I don’t remember the exact words you said, but, ..

Ford: You don’t think White people are to blame for anything?

Tan: I don’t know how you can take a statement where I’m saying that I think White people have done something wrong, and say that I don’t blame White people for anything.

Ford: I said, “aside from not taking their own side sufficiently”.

Tan: Yes. Well there’s probably other things that they’ve done wrong too! , but that’s the main thing vis-a-vis jews. When it has to do with the jews, and the existential threat that the jews pose, yeah! Not recognizing that existential threat and doing something about it, yeah, that’s the big mistake! It’s going to be an existential mistake, the way things are shaping up.

[57:34]

The lie, by the way, just to go back, because I think it’s important. It has to do with this ad hominem thing, and the fact that when he came on with you Cofnas, what Cofnas described as an ad hominem, was the fact that MacDonald, toward the end of his response, had noted that Cofnas was basically behaving like a jew. That he was doing “cognitive group, conscious cognitive thinking”, or something. I forget what the term was exactly. But then Cofnas turned around, and said “that’s ad hominem!”

No! First of all that’s something he admitted himself! That his attitude about MacDonald, and his work, changed. He originally had an a positive attitude, and this is when he was talking to you, and then when he became more involved with Judaism and the jewish community, as he put it, that’s when his attitude changed. Because, according to him, he said, “then he saw that it was different”, or that it didn’t agree with the way MacDonald described things.

But the second way it was a lie, I say, to call it “ad hominem” is that’s what MacDonald’s work is all about! Is understanding jew psychology, and understanding jew tactics, and strategy, and what they do! How they do it!

So, you know, pointing to that and saying it’s “ad hominem”, as if MacDonald is trying to distract from the argument by calling attention to Cofnas’ jewishness, no! It’s Cofnas that’s trying to escape attention as a jew! That, what he’s doing as a jew fits the very thing that MacDonald has been writing about!

[59:05]

Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy

top

Ford: Is Judaism a “group evolutionary strategy”?

Tan: Yes!

Ford: What does that mean?

Tan: It means it’s an adaptive thing that they do. That help them survive. Helps them thrive. And there’s many other examples.

Jews Marrying Non-jews

top

Ford: Okay, so in the United States, at least sixty percent of jews are marrying non-jews. Is that part of their “group evolutionary strategy”?

Tan: In a way it is. First of all, I think I’ve actually blogged on this Pew poll that I think that number is based on. And that’s the jew spin on the poll, that “Oh Vey”, you know, jews are marrying out. The jews are going to disappear, it’s a second “Holocaust”!

And what they gloss over is the fact that jews are not going to disappear, because there’s all these ultra orthodox jews that have lots and lots of kids. So for every jew that’s marrying out, there’s three jews that are Orthodox jews, that are the jewishy jews, the most conscious jews of their jewishness.

[60:11]

But it also goes to this point I made earlier about there’s two kinds of jews. And they work together. They’re maybe not consciously, or directly linked to each other, but their actions reinforce each other. And that is, the jews that are marrying out tend to be these “down-low jews”. The jews who are in one way, or another, moving away from the core of the jewishy jews, of the ultra orthodox, Haradim jews.

Who are going the opposite direction which is, you know, basically insulating themselves from everyone else. But this is the basic mechanics of their form of parasitism. That the jews that marry out, they don’t forget that they’re jews, they don’t totally leave behind their jewishness. It informs their politics, and what they do in the world, and what they tend to do in the world. And White racialists have known, have recognized this for a long time. Is that somebody who’s part jewish tends to take the jew side in any sort of conflict. They side with the jews, they argue in favor of the jews, and they generally tend to undermine Whites who are trying to stay White and do things the White way.

And that’s the effect of this marrying out that, you know, you’re deploring from a jewish point of view, that it means the jews are going to go extinct in time, when it’s not, because there’s plenty of jews who don’t marry out. And the second thing is the great harm that it causes. Every jew that marries out into the non jew world becomes an agent for jewry, and then redirects resources from the non jew world toward the jews, that are staying jews.

Ford — So Anything jews Do is Group Evolutionary Strategy?

top

Ford: So jews marry out as part of the group evolutionary strategy, and if jews marry in, it’s part of the group evolutionary strategy. So whatever the jews do, it’s just part of this group evolutionary strategy?

Tan: Yes, this is the kind of, … talk about simplistic childish arguments. The jews do it all! Yeah! And I’m criticizing both aspects of it and explaining how it works together in favor of the jews as a group.

And you’re saying, oh that somehow I’m being silly, because I’m basically, that I’m making a tautology out of it. No matter what the jews do it’s wrong! Well in a sense that’s actually right! Whatever the jews do, because they’re a distinct group of people and they see Whites as their enemy, they’re a parasitic group and that they harm my group. Yeah! Everything that the jews do is wrong! No matter what they do.

[62:50]

[Ford starts laughing]

A jew can kill themselves and I’m going to say:

“Yeah they were just doing that to get sympathy, or something!”

I could find some way to figure how it is best for the jews. Now I want you to admit something here! And this is one of the key things about the Cofnas thing that was lost in the scuffle between the two of them. Is this “good for the jews thing”.

Jews Always Arguing About What’s Best for the Jews!

top

That underneath, … the way I put it, is I take these this these two jewish sayings that, you know, “two jews, three opinions!” and I say:

“Two jews, three opinions about what’s best for the jews!”

That’s the key! They are arguing with each other and taking different routes to doing things, but it’s always with the underlying idea that it’s best for the jews. They’ll have knockdown, drag out, fights with each other about this, or that aspect, of how they should go about their jewing. But in the end, the premise that both sides, or all sides, of the jewish argument have, all the different facets of their jewing, is what’s best for the jews?

The Zionist jews are saying;

“This is what’s best for the jews!”

The anti-Zionist jews are saying:

“No! No! This is what’s best for the jews!”

The communist jews are saying:

“This is what’s best for the jews!”

The anti-communist jews, the same thing! I mean, that’s what’s at the root, and that’s how you understand what the jews are doing! And to reduce that down to: [in a mocking whiny jew tone of voice]

“Well you’re just criticizing the jews, no matter what they do! If they say black, or if they say White, whatever, …”

Yeah, it is that simple! But it’s not, because I’m crazy! It’s not, because I’m imagining things. I’m explaining to you that’s what’s going on. They explain it! They use this phrase, one of the articles about you is:

“Is Luke Ford Good for the jews?” This is not some phrase that Hitler invented! This is not some phrase that “anti-semites” invented. This is the question that they ask themselves! This is the way they justify trying to pursue their interests. It’s a sort of key phrase, that when you see it, it means they’re trying to pursue their interests.

[64:49]

“Jews are Not a Monolith” — A Silly Statement!

top

And that’s another key phrase that comes up in this context is “monolith”. “The jews are not a monolith!” is what you constantly hear. And anybody who thinks the jews are a monolith is crazy! , because the jews:

“Look! The jews are arguing with each other all the time! There are jews that do the complete opposite of what another group of jews are doing!”

Yeah, well, but they’re still jews aren’t they? Even the statement “The jews are not a monolith” is a silly statement. Because it’s basically saying this category, this group, “the jews” which implicitly by calling them “the jews” are saying they’re a monolith, is categorically not a category! It’s ridiculous! It’s a ridiculous statement! But people don’t generally take things apart! They don’t look at it that way. I’m a computer programmer. I work on abstractions and solving problems, so I know how to take things, logical statements like that, and reduce them down to the essence of what they’re saying. And I point those things out. And it always surprises me. I say something like that, like:

“Jews are not a monolith! Well yeah, the category is not categorically a category and that’s nonsense!”

And people go:

“Wow! Gee! I never even thought about that!”

And I sometimes think it’s too simple even to write!

The Root of jewing is: “Is it Good for the jews?”

top

Ford: Okay, you said a lot there. What was it that you wanted me to admit? I didn’t quite follow.

Tan: Admit that at the root of the jewing is: “Is it good for the jews?” This question that all the jews, of all the different stripes, ask each other. And that’s the root of all their debates, is they disagree on what’s best for the jews, which is a fundamental agreement.

Ford: No.

Tan: It appears that they’re not monolithic. It appears that they’re disagreeing with each other. But it’s really just all about, what’s best for themselves as a group.

[66:39]

Culture of Critique’s Chapter 7 on Immigration

top

Ford: No. I think that’s ridiculous! And I tell you why. Many people find the most powerful chapter [Chapter 7] in Kevin MacDonald’s “Culture of Critique” is the chapter on immigration.

And Kevin MacDonald has absolutely no doubt that non-White immigration is a very important threat to, you know, Whites sovereignty in their own lands! As Kevin MacDonald writes in his response to Cofnas:

“Ethnic displacement is like reducing an extended family, or other lineage. It’s a drastic loss of fitness! And really no different from displacement on one’s species, or subspecies, by another, in the natural world. This is natural selection in action as the gene frequency, genetic combinations, and bio-culture’s characteristics of other peoples increased relative to those of the indigenous peoples of Western European countries, as well as their descendants in North America, Australia, and New Zealand.”

So, in his response to Nathan Cofnas, Kevin MacDonald is very clear that ethnic displacement is just an absolute disaster for the people being displaced! So, when you have jews who are lobbying for and pushing the displacement of jews in the jew state of Israel, they are doing the very thing that Kevin MacDonald says is a disaster! So, you have all these jewish intellectuals who Kevin MacDonald sites as evidence of Judaism’s group evolutionary strategy, who are promoting Arab immigration to Israel! Who are promoting African immigration to Israel! Who are essentially promoting open borders for Israel! Who are promoting the end of Israel as a jewish state! But they are promoting ethnic displacement, and that is a widespread theme in the jewish left!

Tan: Are you saying that they’re doing it, because they want to destroy the jews?

Ford: I’m saying that your point doesn’t make any sense, because these left wing jews are pushing the very ethnic displacement that MacDonald says is an absolute disaster for the people being displaced. Jews are pushing the displacement of their own kind, obviously they’re not acting in Jewish interests!

In Kevin MacDonald’s own logic.

Tan: It’s based on the premise that jews and Whites are very similar to each other. Which is wrong. The jews are a people that have lived as a minority amongst other peoples, their whole history. And so even if you were to flood Israel, and jews were to become a minority in Israel, it wouldn’t be a real existential threat to the jews. They’ve lived that way in diaspora forever!

Open Borders for Israel is My Attitude

top

And they live that way in the United States. So let’s take the United States, which is what I really care about. I don’t give a shit about what happens in Israel! Open borders for Israel is my attitude!

But in the United States, what’s going to happen, is there’s going to be different outcomes. I know Steven Steinlight and his attitude is:

“Oh my God! It’s going to be a disaster! We’re going to a whole bunch of people who are going to believe in the “Holocaust”” like the current White Americans do.

But, what’s actually going to happen, is it’s going to lead to the mixing out of the White population of America, in much the same way as happened in Brazil, or any of the former White countries, anywhere. Because Whites don’t have this strong and long history of identifying as a group, and fighting consciously against other groups.

I mean, there was when the country was founded, Whites had a stronger identity when they were conquering the North American continent. But that’s been psychopathologised, and demonized in Whites. And Whites are cowed, whether it will kick in again when the existential threat becomes clear, is, … I think it will eventually, but whether it’s going to be too late, or not, I don’t know. Whites will already be reduced to a small minority by then. And they don’t do well.

Jews Not Threatened in a Multi-ethnic Society

top

We’re seeing what’s happening in South Africa with a small White minority. That will not happen to the jews! The jews already run the country. And they’ll continue to run the country, no matter how fractured it becomes ethnically. And, in fact, it’ll become easier for them to run, because they’ll have even more players that they can set at each other. The “let you and him fight” tactic that they use. The “divide and conquer” will become all the easier, because the people are already divided. They’ve imported all sorts of different types of people that they can create strife between.

So they’re not threatened in the United States, and I don’t think that they’re threatened in Israel for the same reason. That they’ll still be able to maintain control. They have colonies all over the world, that they can always go to. They’re not threatened, and I don’t give a shit anyway, if they were threatened! But I’m pointing out to you that it’s simplistic, at the very least, you’re being naive to argue as if they are the same as Whites! As if the threat from immigration is the same to jews as it is to Whites. Because it isn’t!

[71:33]

Jews and the Second World War

top

Ford: So, how did the jewish tactic of “divide and conquer” work for them in World War Two?

Tan: I think it worked very well! Millions and millions of Europeans killed each other.

Ford: How many jews do you think died in World War Two?

Tan: Not enough! And not many. Certainly not the magical six million that they always quote.

Ford: How many would you expect?

Tan: I don’t know. I have no idea. But it was nothing [?] really.

Ford: So you think the jewish strategy really worked really well for them in World War Two?

Tan: Let me put it in jewish terms. One jewish life isn’t, or one European, one White life, is not worth a million, six million jewish lives! So I don’t care how many jews died in World War Two. I don’t care!

Ford: Awesome!

I appreciate how open and honest you are. And so, I think you said earlier if jews kill themselves you see that as pursuing jewish interest. Was that sarcastic, was that ironic, or was the how you really feel?

Being Evidence Based

top

Tan: No. I think I could actually find literally a way to see how, … Well I would find the evidence. You know, that I’m evidence based. If you’ve ever read my blog, you know, I don’t just make shit up out of nowhere! I find people what people have actually written, I go to pains to quote it. I don’t just write about it, and misrepresent it. I snip it out with context. I give links to what I write, and then I explain, this is the way I see it.

And I think to the extent I appeal to any of my readers, it’s, because I do that. It’s, because I lay it out very clearly! I’m not just making stuff up.

In that case I was speculating, that if a jew killed themselves, that I could probably, I would look for evidence that they were doing it for some advantage to the jews, or some way to harm Whites. Yes for sure.

School Shooting in Florida

top

Because that’s what I do in general with anything that happens. An example is the school shooting in Florida, you know, how the jews, … The first thing I heard about it was that some White supremacist shot up a school in Florida. And that’s all I heard. But when you dig into it you find out the kid is half jewish. At least. The jewish media didn’t report that, except sort of as a detail buried in some other story that portrayed him as a racist.

And the other thing about it is that the school is something like forty percent jewish, which explains why the jews were so up in arms about it from the get go! Because they all knew that it was a heavily jewish County, and a heavily jewish school. And the funny thing about that is that less than forty percent of the victims were jewish, but they never talk about that. They just jump to the conclusion right away, there’s a shooting at a school in a jewish area, it’s got to be a White supremacist that did it! They found, some idiot gave them a tip, that turned out to be false. That it was a White supremacist and they ran with it! And for a day that was the what the narrative was in the cycle. They never corrected it. Never paid any price for it.

Yeah. So that’s the kind of thing I do. I look at what’s going on in the world, what are people excited about, and what’s the jewish angle to it. And if I find a jewish angle I write about it, and I talk about it.

[74:57]

Does MacDonald’s Model Have Predictive Value?

top

Ford: So does the model of judaism as a group evolutionary strategy have predictive value?

Tan: Predictive? In a couple of ways, yeah. First of all I think when something happens it’s probably involves the jews. And there’s probably some hidden angle to it that involves the jews. So it’s predictive in that way. It’s predictive in the way I said about immigration. That we kind of know what’s going to happen when the country is flooded with that with non-Whites. It’s not going to harm the jews, they’re used to living that way.

Ford: So I just want to point out a couple of ways that you are significantly different from Kevin MacDonald. Kevin MacDonald says explicitly that Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy, does not have any predictive value. And he also says that once intermarriage rates start climbing north of sixty percent, that for those jews who are out-marrying, that’s no longer a model of Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy. So, you and Kevin differ.

Jewish Out-Marriage One Half of the Parasitism

top

Tan: Yeah. He’s never made the point, … Yeah, about the out-marriage thing, I don’t know of anybody really who’s looked at it and talked about it the way I have. That it’s actually the other half of the parasitism. That it facilitates, … I reduce the parasitism to “infiltration, manipulation, and exploitation”. And it kind of goes in that sequence. That first the jews infiltrate your society as jews, or maybe in secret. But part of that infiltration is intermarrying with the host population. And they do that maybe not consciously, but it ends up working to their, in fact, and they go to pains to indoctrinate their children not to marry out.

The other remarkable thing about the out-marriage. The stink the jews make about all the out-marriage, is that it’s in spite of the fact that they consciously, explicitly, tell their kids that’s not what they want them to do! They want them to find a good jewish boy, or a good jewish girl, to marry. But despite that, some still marry out. But it still ends up working to their advantage. For the point that I’ve made. That it helps them to infiltrate. It helps them to further manipulate the host population, so that they can exploit the resources of the host population for the benefit of the jews who remain jews!

[77:22]

Ford: Right. So, when jews marry out, that’s part of that group evolutionary strategy, and when they marry in, that’s part of their group evolutionary strategy! [Tan starts laughing] When they promote immigration restriction that’s part of their group evolutionary strategy! When they promote immigration expansion, that’s part of their group evolutionary strategy! When they promote the Republican Party, …

Tan: Yes! Whatever is good for the jews, Luke. We’ve already covered this. It’s situational. And I think that’s the point that MacDonald was making. I don’t think he said that, … I don’t remember him saying that it’s not “predictive”, his Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy.

Ford: You’ll find that on Twitter. He said that it doesn’t have any predictive value.

Tan: What I remember him, … the point he emphasized a lot, is that the jews adapt their strategy. That it doesn’t stay constant over time. That they adapt to the changing environment around them. And that is a good indication that they are active, conscious, … What is it, … they have agency. And a lot of the arguments that you’re from jews, in defense of their jewing, is this pretense that the jews don’t have agency.

And that’s another thing MacDonald has never talk about that, I don’t think. But that’s one of the ways that I analyze what’s going on. That, this idea of “agency”, about being in control. Being, first of all, conscious of yourself as a group, and then exerting what power you have over the reality around you, to change it. And that the jews, … I agree with MacDonald that the jews don’t just consistently follow one strategy, that they change. They morph, they sometimes go back and forth between the out-marriage in and the staying insular. It goes back and forth.

The genetic evidence, for instance, shows that the Ashkenazi jews, at some point in the past, took European wives. But then that stopped. And for many generations then, they just were endogamous. They married within their population. And that’s what’s remarkable about Ashkenazi jews. It’s not the fact that they lived in Europe, but the fact that they’ve stayed jews! That they’ve stayed an insular, identifiably different, distinct population. And they’ve resisted mixing with Europeans. They’ve mixed a little bit, but not as much as other groups of Europeans have mixed together and blend.

[79:48]

Ford: Okay, so I want to respond to something you said.

You said jewish strategy is situational, but the essence of the Cofnas critique, and what I’m saying, is that the examples of jewish disagreement that are given in the Cofnas critique and what I gave, are not comparing jews at different historical periods. They are comparing jews in the very same period, in the very same place.

So I’m talking about in the United States of America. You are saying when jews marry out it’s “group evolutionary strategy” and when they marry in it’s “group evolutionary strategy“.

United States of America, when they promote immigration restriction, that’s part of the jewish “group evolutionary strategy“. When they promote immigration expansion, it’s part of the “group evolutionary strategy“. If jews kill themselves as part of the jewish “group evolutionary strategy“. [Tan starts laughing] Like whatever jews do, … So your theory cannot, …

Whatever jews Do is Bad, Because They are the Enemy!

top

Tan: Luke, I’ve already commented to that! Yeah, whatever jews do is bad! Yeah! That’s, because they’re the enemy!

So, from my point of view, … I didn’t start out with that point of view, but over time I’ve realized it’s pretty fruitless to argue with the jew, about what they’re doing wrong. Because they’re not going to stop it. They’re going to come up with arguments like what you’re coming up with. Which is that:

“I’m the problem! That I’m imagining! That no matter what jews do, it’s a problem!”

Yes! It is!

And I think I’ve been reasonable. I’ve explained how it’s different. And you, you know, this, to different jews at the same time, are doing different things. Yeah, well, did it occur to you that maybe those two different jews disagree about what they think is best for the jews?

But the point is that they’re both trying to pursue what they think is best for the jews, or at least they say that. At least that’s their act. I grant that some of them may do what they want to do and that their excuse is:

“Well it’s best for the jews!”

But I think Whites aren’t even doing that! So, we’d be a lot better off if we were pursuing a strategy like that, “What’s best for the Whites”. And even if some of them would were not sincere, if at least some of them were, we would have a better chance of thriving, than we are now, where basically, Whites are demoralized, disorganized, and dying.

[82:02]

Do White People Have Agency?

top

Ford: Though White people have agency?

Tan: Yes they do!

Ford: They’re responsible for the societies that create?

Tan: Yes.

Ford: So then the jewish question isn’t really that big?

Tan: Yes it is, actually. Because it has to do with control. Who actually has control at this moment? And it’s pretty obvious to me that the jews have control, maybe not absolute control. There are things that they can’t control. The Internet is one, for instance. The fact that I can publish my thoughts on the internet. But they’re working to change that! And they will eventually succeed. We know from history, in the Soviet Union they made “anti-semitism”, air quotes, a crime! They made it a capital crime. You paid with your life!

Ford: How do you think someone who doesn’t know either of us, and doesn’t have a strong opinion either way on the JQ. When they hear you say anything jews do is for jewish interests. How do you think they hear that?

Luke, You’re Not Making Honest, Valid Arguments

top

Tan: I think the they’ll hear that you’re playing games! That you’re smart enough to realize that the arguments you’re making are not honest arguments, are not valid arguments. I’m upfront about my bias. I’m biased in favor of Whites. I see it jews as the enemy of Whites. And that’s where everything that I’m saying springs from. But that doesn’t mean I’m making stuff up, out of nowhere. It doesn’t mean that I’m being irrational! So, I trust that will come through to any White person who listens to this. And I don’t have any, … I wouldn’t be talking to a “jew jew” to begin with. I’m not interested at all in saying anything that appeals to them.

[83:59]

Ford: So you said the arguments I mentioned are dishonest. So could you restate in your own words what are my arguments, and why they’re dishonest, or just pick one.

Tan: No. I don’t have a photographic memory, and you would then pick nits with “I got some word wrong” about what you said. I’m confident that if somebody listens to this, if I listen to this afterward, I’ll be happy with the arguments that I made. And I’ll be happy, I think, that people whose opinions I care about, will hear the way that you’re arguing. It’s not like the first time I’ve heard these kinds of arguments made. The intermarriage argument, or the “immigration is also bad for the jews”. These are not important to me. I don’t care!

Would You Describe jews as Ethnocentric?

top

Ford: So would you describe jews as ethno-centric?

Tan: Absolutely! They are probably, the most ethnocentric people that there! The most a ethnocentric group, the most powerful group. They are the most hyper conscious of themselves as a group.

Ford: So jews are the most ethnocentric people there are, yet they marry out of a sixty percent, while there are plenty of other groups that rarely marry out. But somehow jews who are marrying out in the majority are more ethnocentric than groups that don’t marry out?

Tan: I’ve already explained how the marrying out actually ends up helping them as a group. And that the ones that don’t marry out, reproduce at very high rates. And so there’s no threat to their survival. And that I think I’ve made that case, repeatedly So, if you are to continue to characterize it as somehow wrong, I’m not going to repeat myself on that point.

Ford: I didn’t characterize it. Anyway, I just asked you a question.

Tan: Okay. Next question.

Ford: Okay. So when we have jews who are over-represented among the leadership of violently opposing movements, this does not seem to fit in any obvious way with MacDonald’s theory which is, … the essence of at least one of MacDonald’s theories in “Culture of Critique”, is that jews push the opposite on non-jews, that they seek for themselves.

So, on non-jews they push multiculturalism, multiracialism, while they seek to conserve the benefits of cohesion and exclusion for their own group.

Jews Moralize to Whites to Convince Them That What is Good for Whites is Bad

top

Tan: I think that’s just normal behavior. I would term it and explain it in a different way, or describe it in a different way. It’s just what you do to your enemy.

If you have a rifle and your enemy has a rifle, you try to take your enemy’s rifle away. If you can do it by talking nonsense to him, getting him to think that holding a rifle is wrong, morally, well that’s great! That’s what the jews do, in fact!

A lot of what they do is just moralizing! That’s what they’ve been doing the longest. They convince people that doing what’s good for the jews, is good! And doing what’s good for themselves is bad! It’s really that basic! And they’ve been doing that since Christ, and probably before, into the dim traces of history. We have a less complete understanding of, …

Ford: So the examples that Kevin MacDonald uses to back up their assertion, actually turn out to be counterexamples, so, …

Tan: I don’t agree with that. That’s Cofnas’ characterization of it. And I don’t agree with that.

Ford: Okay. So I’ll just give one of his arguments and you can point out where it’s factually, or logically incorrect.

Tan: Sure.

Ford: So Kevin MacDonald notes that in a 1974 article of the top twenty one intellectuals in the United States, that fifteen with jews and MacDonald’s notes that eleven them were New York jews. All who were at one point, or another, this is MacDonald’s exact phrasing:

“Significantly influenced by Freudian theory.”

Tan: Yeah.

Fifteen jewish Intellectuals

top

Ford: So! When you examine these fifteen jews, they are: Daniel Bell, Noam Chomsky, Irving Howard, Norman Mailer, Robert Silvers, Susan Sontag, Lionel Trilling, Hanna Arendt, Saul Bello, Paul Goodman, Richard Hofstadter, Irving Crystal, Herbert Marcuse, Norman Podhoretz, and David Reinsman.

Only one of these intellectuals actually exemplifies his theory. That Norman Podhoretz, who pushed immigration restriction for Israel and, you know, immigration expansion for the United States. So the very example that MacDonald uses to try to make his case that judaism is a group evolutionary strategy, actually turns out to be a counterexample, because so many of these names were pushing the very same thing for Israel, as they were pushing for the United States. So, that seems to me, a substantial challenge to MacDonald scholarship. What do you think?

Tan: I think MacDonald has to defend himself on that point, if that’s the way he chooses to argue it. Then he’s got to defend his approach to arguing it.

I would argue it as it’s not, … I would simply say the jews are the enemy. And so that’s, you know, jews, jewing freely like they were. Some of those names, Marcuse, and Sontag. I mean, these were virulently, in the true sense of the word “virulence“, virulent anti-White jews! They were enemies of White people! They were explicit about it! And that’s what’s important about those jews from my point of view. Not that they were part of a jewish intellectual movement that was intellectually consistent, or not.

[90:00]

In the case of the Freudians they were just fraudulent! So, you know, the fact that some of them were, this list of jews was supposedly Freudians and that was supposed to prove something. The fact that they’re jews. And the fact that some of them, two of them, at least off the top of my head, if you read that list again I could probably name another one, or two, that I know for sure have been anti-White. Hofstadter is the other one I can remember. He was the one who wrote the about the conspiratorial mind of the right wing, or something stupid like that. He was a half jew too, Richard Hofstadter, if I’m correct.

Whites Don’t Recognise That jews are at War with Them!

top

They were basically at war with the Whites in America! And the Whites in America didn’t recognise it as warfare!

The jews understood it as warfare! They saw themselves as a group — opposed to the Whites who still had control over some parts of the levers of power in America — and they worked as a team in different ways, doing different things. So you’re going to be able to find examples where this jew argued for this and this jews argued for the exact opposite, but they consciously saw themselves as being on a team, and as being opposed to those other people, the White people in America. And that they were in a struggle for control over America. And they won, in the end. They have control today. More control than they had, back when they were working!

Ford: So in 1948 when Hannah Arendt along with Sidney Hawk and twenty four other prominent jews signed a letter to the New York Times describing the political party of Menachem Begin as closely akin in it’s organization, methods, and political philosophy, to the Nazi Party, is out also part of the jewish group evolutionary strategy, where they call their own major political party in the jewish state, as akin to Nazi Parties?

Jews Behaving as “Nazis”

top

Tan: I could see how it could be. Just to make the point, the Nazis were reacting to jewing, and in some ways you could say that what they were doing was trying to meet the jews, using the same tactics. So it’s not a surprise when even jews recognize that Israelis are behaving like Nazis, or that jews are behaving like Nazis. The jews to the extent they can, have tried to forbid anyone from saying such a thing. That’s the most, that’s the strongest form, of quote, unquote, “anti-semitism” that there is, according to jews. To call jews a “Nazi”, because, you know, they would want Nazi to mean the exact opposite of jews. That “jew” means good, and right, and righteous! And “Nazi” is wrong and evil!

[92:56]

But the fact is, if you look at it objectively, and I’m not even looking at it objectively, you can see the similarities.

It’s about being conscious of yourself as a group and being ruthless about pursuing your interests as a group. And I’m not surprised at all that there are some jews who say as a jew:

“I think it’s bad for the jews, if jews act like Nazis!”

That’s pretty much how they put it! I wouldn’t be surprised at all if you could find that in this statement, whatever this document is that you’re citing, that you find what they’re arguing is that it would be bad for the jews, if people got the perception the jews were acting like Nazis! Because they are sensitive to the fact that White people don’t like hypocrisy!

They don’t like when people, like jews, say this is not good you shouldn’t do this! You shouldn’t organize! You shouldn’t be tribal! You know, this tribalism is bad! Some tribalist jew is, … I see this on a daily basis in the jewish media. Some jew, who is basically pretending not to be a jew, most of the time, or at least not openly identifying themselves as a jew, writing a an op-ed about how bad “tribalism” is for democracy.

That’s hypocrisy! Right? And so when a White person points out, or notices on their own, that this is a tribalist jew saying it’s bad, that tribalism is bad, a White person gets upset about that. A White person resents that!

Intersectional jewing — Where One jew Agenda Conflicts with Another jew Agenda

top

So there are jews who are sensitive to that, and want to head that off before it happens. They want to get out in front of it.

That’s something I wanted to bring up about this, you know, jews taking supposedly opposite positions.

A good example with Cofnas, is Cofnas is part of the upstart reaction to the dominant jewing which is going on right now, having to do with race. The “anti-racism jewing”, I call it. The prevailing opinion about race, is that it’s just a “social construct”, there’s no biological founding to it. And jews like Cofnas which I identify as say, “race realist” jews, they’re pushing back against this. It’s something, it’s a phenomenon I call “intersectional jewing”. Where there’s some jewing that’s going on, and it goes on so hard, and so long, and so deep that it’s starting to, maybe impinge on other jews and their jewing! What they want to do! They maybe working in biology, there maybe working in DNA research, and there uncovering stuff that’s being somehow impinged on by this anti-racist jewing. So they start to push back, like Cofnas is part of this movement. Pinker and David Reich.

[95:37]

But then it’s not like those are the only two opinions. You’d think it, because those two jewish groups, they point at the other as the enemy, and they start fighting and it’s a big fake fight! They never identify the jewish core at the heart of both of the groups! And they’re pushing, they’re stealing the air from anyone else! The “racists”! I mean, this is something I need to write about still. This thing that’s going on with Pinker and Reich in the paper that Cofnas, is like a just a sideshow to. He’s part of it, but they don’t want MacDonald to be better known.

Intersectional jewing — Promoting Reich, Pinker and Cofnas as Being Against “anti-racist” jewing

top

But they’re putting Reich and Pinker out front with their new books. All about this anti, this pushback against the “anti-racist” jewing that’s been going on since the end of World War Two. Because science, there’s evidence for race in science! They’ve never been able to destroy it. And it’s bubbling up again! It can’t be, the truth about that can’t be suppressed.

But they are basically, in their papers, Reich and Pinker both, what they share in common, is they’re both saying:

“Look! We’ve got to confront this truth! We’ve got to confront this reality! Because otherwise my six million, the ‘Holocaust‘, these bad people, the racists, the Nazis, are going to be talking about it. And they’re going to be boosted by the fact that they’re actually talking about the truth, and we aren’t!”

So this is the phenomena. It’s not as simple as just the jews do, some jews walk on the Left, and some jews walk on the Right, and those are the only two ways. That’s a false dichotomy! The jews steal the air! They have both the dominant position, and the challenge to the false opposition to the dominant position. And they squeeze the air out of the room, so nobody else, so no true opposition can arise.

Why are Whites Unable to Overcome the jews?

top

Ford: Why are Whites unable to overcome that?

[97:30]

Tan: Well the first part of it. Millions of White people died in that war [WWII], and why people are hesitant to go to war again over this kind of issue. So, I think, that at a very primal level it’s just bad “juju”.

That’s not a pun, it’s just bad! You know, at a subconscious level, I think White people just realize there’s, … first of all on an individual level, a White person thinks:

“Hey, I don’t like what’s going on, and, you know, it seems to have something to do with the jews. I better shut my mouth. Just keep my mouth shut!”

So White people tend to be kind of individualistic. They’re encouraged to be individualistic, either that, or humanistic. Definitely nothing having to do with race! And so it sort of squeezes out, this pressure from the media, pressure from the government, pressure from all the authority figures, that says:

“Don’t think about race! Don’t think about your own kind! That’s evil!”

And so Whites tend to think individually:

“What do I have to do to survive on my own?”

Or:

“How do I join some foreign legion, or some other larger group that seems to care about all of humanity?”

And that’s why it doesn’t happen. It wasn’t always like this! A hundred years ago, before the war, there was a vibrant and growing awareness. Maddison Grant is a good example. That came up in Cofnas’ paper. Maddison Grant’s “Passing of the Great Race” was a popular book. It was a bestseller! It was these ideas, were being presented to White people, and White people were beginning to understand, and beginning to accept them.

[99:15]

Super Chats — What Should White Guys Do to Spread Awareness of the JP?

top

Ford: Let me read some super chats and I’ll pause after each one. If you want to comment, just jump in and comment, or just say “pass”.

Frank writes:

“Luke, thanks for having Tan on the show. Could you ask him what young White guys should do to spread awareness of the jewish problem?”

Tan: Talk about it. Don’t let it slide!

And talk about it seriously! I mean, there’s a value to the memes. I understand the whole, you know, let’s joke about it. Let’s make it ironic and all that. And we can slide in under the radar that way.

But, talk seriously about it, too, and think seriously about it. One of the things that I’d like people to do, is to not take away from the example I set. Is don’t think that anything that I’m doing, says, or implies that I think it’s okay, to get married to somebody who’s jewish, or somebody who’s half jewish. I don’t! Part of why I do what I do as unapologetically and as unrelenting as I do, is I don’t want other White kids, White boys to make the same mistake, or White girls for that matter.

I don’t, you know, I chalk it up partly to my own bad instincts that it happened to me. But also I was in a society that didn’t teach about the jews. Didn’t, there was no, nothing bad could be said about the jews. It’s still true to a certain extent today, although we have on the Internet the freedom to start talking to each other. And that’s why there is hope now. And it’s better.

But, you know, keep your head low, too! Don’t do anything stupid, I would advise young White guys. Keep your powder dry. The kind of silly way of putting it, that old men usually put it! But it’s coming! And they’ll be a time to act. And just wait for that time. Be a leader. We need leaders too! Not everybody needs to be a leader, but we’re still waiting for a good leader to come forth.

[101:25]

Ford — Are You a Leader?

top

Ford: Are you a leader?

Tan: No.

I recused myself. First of all, it’s not in my personality, even if I wanted to be a leader, I wouldn’t be a good leader. I’m too, … I don’t know how to describe it. Basically I refuse to do it. And I’m not cut out for it. I’m damaged goods, I’m compromised. So, there’s no way I could be one.

Ford: Okay, I’m going to read three comments by the same jew, and again you’re welcome to comment, or say “pass”. One:

“My father is a military officer and a NRA member. Strategy?

Tan: I don’t know what that means.

Comments — Are All jews In On It?

top

Ford: Okay. Second comment:

“Ask this guy, if all jews are in on it?”

Tan: No. I don’t think all jews understand things the way I understand it. But they certainly, and this goes along with the most ethnocentric group, they are the most aware. The largest percentage of their population is aware of themselves as jews, and unapologetically pursues the interest of the jews, what’s best for the jews. Ask him back, does he know the statement “What’s good for the jews”? Can he acknowledge that?

Ford: I’m sure he does.

Tan: So he’s in on it! Yes!

Ford: Okay.

Tan: He’s in on it!

Ford: Okay.

And then he also writes:

“Tell Tan that many jews are screwed over by jewish power. I am one of them.”

Tan: Take it up with the jews!

Ford:

“They ruin society in general. I’m not elite, I am just as screwed.”

Tan: I don’t care! He should take it up with the jews then, just like I am.

Ford: Okay.

Tan: That’s his business. It’s between him and his own people. Go move to Israel and vote for open borders.

Comments — Is Monomania on the JQ Better Than White Improvement?

top

Ford: OK. Randolph write:

“Is monomania on JQ better than White improvement?”

[104:31]

Tan: [laughing] Yeah, well, I’ve already addressed that. But “monomania” is one of those things, that’s one of the psychopathologizing words, that if you talk too much about the jews — which is easy to do, because not many people talk about the jews — that it can be characterized that as “monomania”.

I’ve been accused of “monomania” by other people who supposedly are not just White racialists, but are critical of jews themselves. They think I go too far! That I talk only about the jews! And they call it “monomania”. Which is basically just following the jewish pattern of criticizing people who are critical of jews. I dismiss it!

If anything, Whites are not critical enough of jews. Imagine jews criticizing other jews for being too monomaniacal about “anti-semitism”. I’m sure that there are some that do. I don’t really care that they do, but it’s not a problem that jews have. jews complain plenty about “anti-semitism”. That’s their number one concern, they’re obsessed with it. They’re obsessed with their own interests. And so I would see, I would say that this my concern about the jews, which is being characterized as “monomania”, is nothing but concern for my own people. I wouldn’t care at all about the jews, if they were living on the other side of the planet and had no impact on White people.

Do jews Control the Weather?

top

Ford:

“Do jews control the weather?”

Tan: You know what was interesting about that the black guy who said that, he said the Rothschilds. That was immediately interpreted by the jews media, as the jews! That’s the first thing about that. And the second thing about that, is the jews do control what that black guy says, because as they came down on him like a ton of bricks, and he immediately apologized, and explained that:

“Oh no! I’m sorry, the jewish people are such, …”

I don’t even know what he said, but it was just grovelling. It was grovelling. And so the jews do have power where it counts, which is making people who are critical of them, either shut up, or grovel, and, or both!

So that’s what’s that’s the interesting thing about that “jews control the weather” thing.

[105:45]

Comments — How are Whites to Speak on jew Influence Without “anti-semite’ Being Shrieked?

top

Ford: Okay. Fortress comments:

“Nathan Cofnas wrote: ‘there are outliers therefore Kevin MacDonald is now disproven’. Kevin responds: ‘I never said that at all’. So, how are Whites to speak on jewish influence without ‘anti-semite’ being shrieked?”

Tan: It won’t. It will be shrieked, and Whites just have to grow a thicker skin. I interpret it as bad faith, to put it mildly. Like hiding who they are, pretending not to be jews. That it’s the kind of action that an enemy makes. When they screech “anti-semitism”, because George Soros is being criticized, or, because the Rothschilds are being criticized, because globalists are being criticized, they’re basically announcing that they’re the enemy! So if anything, I think considerate helpful.

Ford: Your model that jews are the enemy, is there any way of falsifying that model?

Tan: It’s not a model! It’s an attitude!

Ford: Okay, is it way of falsifying that attitude?

Tan: No! I don’t think there is!

Ford: Yeah.

Tan: I’m not an academic. I’m not trying to prove some thesis.

So, no!

Jews are the Enemy Whatever They Do?

top

Ford: So, you believe jews are the enemy, no matter what they do?

Tan: I believe the jews are the enemy based on what they’ve done. And I believe it won’t change, no matter what I do. No matter what I say. So, that’s my answer to that.

Ford: So, are some jews more of the enemy than other jews?

Tan: I think they’re active at different levels, and in different ways, yeah. You know, like the “in your face jew” versus the “down-low jews”, that I mentioned.

Ford: Okay. I don’t think that answered the question Are all jews equally the enemy, or some jews more the enemy than others?

Tan: All jews, equally? No. I’d say no, not “equally enemies”. It’s like some of them are generals, and some of them are privates, and some of them aren’t participating at all, actively.

Ford: So, are a significant number of jews who are, in effect, not the enemy?

Tan: Not that I’m aware of. That’s the old “good jew”, the search for the “good jew”, that White people tend to fall into the trap of trying to name jews that they think are doing a good thing, and doing the right thing, and “more jews should be like this jew”. I don’t engage in that nonsense.

[108:34]

Is Steve Miller Anti-White?

top

Ford: So, do you think Steven Miller is anti-White?

Tan: No, I think Stephen Miller is against immigration, because he thinks America is a good thing, much like Lawrence Auster. These are jews who basically, I know in Lawrence Auster’s case, he said explicitly, you know, basically “America is good for the jews”! America as it was. But all these Muslims coming in is going to be bad for the jews. And that’s why he was basically against immigration.

And Steven Miller, I assume is similar. His particular thing was Mexicans in California, and then later I think he was critical of Muslims too. I’ve never really analyzed him too closely. I’ve watched a few of his things, his activism in high school and college.

But, I don’t care! I mean, the jews, as a group, don’t get a pass, or don’t get any sort of credit from me, because of what Steven Miller has done.

Stephen Steinlight’s another example of a jew who is critical of immigration, and even the jewish role in immigration. But, it’s, because, he says, he thinks it’s bad for the jews. It’s not, because he feels sorry for White people. It’s not, because he gives a, he cares at all about White people! It’s only, because he cares about jews, that he’s against immigration.

And I wouldn’t say that I know that about Steve Miller, but I would guess that’s the most likely explanation for Miller’s behavior, as well.

[110:04]

Are You an Unhappy Guy?

top

Ford: So there’s some people in chat who say Tan is just an unhappy guy. Are you an unhappy guy?

Tan: [laughing] No. Personally, I’m very happy! My family situation is great! I mean, other than the jew thing, which is as I said, “dooms” me. [Ford laughs]

That is looming always in the back of my mind, so maybe that does make me unhappy. But, in every other respect, I’m well off. I live in a nice place. Partly because I was racially conscious enough to pick a nice place. And my family situation is good. I have nothing to complain about. When people say, “Hey! How you doing?” I have nothing to complain about, except the jews! What’s going on in the world outside and long term is not good. That concerns me, yeah. But my personal situation is not bad at all.

[111:08]

Things That Make You Happy?

top

Ford: So, obviously, as you picked up, some people think you have a “monomania”. I was wondering if you could expand and talk about the things that make you happy?

Tan: Makes me happy?

Well for many years I poured my attention, and got happiness from my career, my profession as a computer programmer. And I still get that. When I get a little bit too angsty about the stuff that I’m dealing with, this sewage that I have to wade through. When I look into what the jews are up to, or have been up to in the past, I often retreat back into my work and I just program for a while. Solve abstract problems with things that have nothing to do with human beings.

And that makes me feel good.

Ford: What about music? Does music make you happy?

Tan: I’m not musically inclined at all. I’ll just leave it there. My kids are, but I attribute that to the jewish side of the family thing, more than me.

Ford: Okay, So there are two critical super chats, I think I’d be more honorable if I read them, while you’re here rather than wait until the end of the show, so, …

Tan: I don’t care about criticism. I do have a thick skin. I don’t care what people have to say about me, and I’ll answer it honestly, to the extent I can. Shoot.

Ford: Rondo says:

“Too many White advocates fall into this monomania.”

Tan: And I say exactly the opposite, not enough do.

Ford: Okay, and Jake the jew says:

“The fundamental point is that being jewish is a crime.”

Tan: The fundamental point is that being a jew, means you’re the enemy. And I don’t give a shit, what you think anyway!

Reflections on This Interview

top

Ford: Okay, so I want to give you five, ten minutes, however much, or two minutes, whatever time you want to take, to just reflect on our dialogue, and at times, debate, and do you think I was fair to you? Do you think I was unfair? Do you think I was playing dirty pool?

Tan: Well at times, … yeah. No thanks for hosting this conversation.

There’s no technical obstacle to me doing podcasts, but it’s hard. The kind of podcast I like to do, are packed with information and insights, and it’s hard to sit down and discipline myself to do them. So, I enjoy these opportunities to just sort of, off the cuff, talk about issues.

And I think for the most part you were fair, or at least you asked questions that got to the root of things, you know, prompted me to get to the important points I wanted to make. And I think I got to all of them. If I didn’t though, I’ll make notes and comments on my own blog post about this. Things I forgot to mention. But, in the middle there you got a little bit, you know, tedious with that childish argument about over simplifying things, to reduce it all to the jews, by continuing to go back to that. That was annoying. But otherwise, I thought that you’re fair when it comes to dealing with the jews. You’re biased in favor of them, because you have joined them!

What Does It Mean To Be a jew?

top

You know, you basically, you’re a White guy who like what you saw and you decided to join their religion, because you thought it was just about a religion. And you even have shown some signs, I thought, some of the stuff I read years ago that you had written, that you realized that it’s not just a religion! That you realize that there is a racial aspect to it. So before I go I did want to get to you on that, you know, ask you, how do you feel about the relationship between genetics, race, and jews, and jewish identity? And what it means to be a jew?

[115:16]

Ford: Well, I’m glad you asked. I think genes are here [putting his hand up high] and I think everything else is downstream from genes. So I think religion is downstream from genetics. I think culture is downstream from genetics. I think politics is downstream from culture, religion. You know, genetics are up here and everything else flows from genetics.

Tan: Is what you’re doing a personal survival strategy? That you think you join the jews, because you’re joining the winning team?

Ford: Not consciously. When I converted I did it, because I thought it was the best way to make a better world. I thought it, …

Tan: A better world for yourself? Or for a better world for somebody else?

Ford: Better world for everyone. I saw it judaism as a step, by step, detailed system for making a better world.

[116:02]

Ford’s Fundamental Misunderstanding of judaism

top

Tan: Now that seems like a fundamental misunderstanding of judaism.

Because they, I know that’s the rhetoric. But that’s not what jews really pursue. They pursue their own interests. And you can understand the double talk as:

“Well, to them, human, you know, jew is all they mean when they talk about humanity.”

They’re talking about jewry! When they talk about God, they’re talking about jewry! When they talk about, in universalist terms, they’re talking about the universal group of jews, not everybody! But they also, they’re smart enough to realise that other people are misled by this kind of rhetoric, and think that they’re talking about everybody. So, now you’ve been in it for years, and you’ve stuck with it! So have you fallen for that? Or do you want to disagree with me and tell me that:

“Oh no! jews really do, … the jewishy jews, the Orthodox jews, really believe that they’re doing the best thing for all of humanity, including the goyim?”

[Ford pauses for a moment]

Ford: I’m thinking. I don’t have an immediate response. I would say that the primary focus of judaism, and of jews, is on the best interests of jews.

Tan: Yeah!

Ford: Not on preaching a moral message to the world. But it’s pragmatic, primarily. What’s in the best interests of jews.

Tan: Yeah. The way I’ve put it, is it’s “particularism”. And that’s one of the hypocrisies that they preach “universalism”, or talk in “universalist” rhetoric to other people, and encourage other people to think in universalist terms, but they think in “particularist” terms themselves. That’s their morality, it’s about themselves. They define themselves, what’s good and bad, in terms of themselves.

That led me to a deeper understanding of what morality actually is. That you can have an individualist morality where good and bad are defined in you in terms of what’s good, or bad for you personally, or you can have a tribal morality, like the jews do, were good and better defined in terms of your limited group, or you can have a universalist, you know, closer to Christianity, Christianity is closer to that morality, where you think in terms of universal good and bad. That something is good, or bad based on some abstract understanding that involves, that applies equally to everyone.

[118:30]

Do You Believe in Universal Morality?

top

Ford: So do you believe in universal morality?

Tan: No! And I don’t believe in individual morality, either. I don’t really think in moral terms. I understand when people struggle and talk about morality though, I decode what they’re saying by understanding it in this way, I’ve just described. I try to understand, are they talking from a individual point of view, maybe even without being conscious of it themselves.

And that’s what I’m getting at with you. Is when you decided to become an Orthodox jew, was it, because you had just been, you know, through hell in being involved with porn, and there were lots of jews involved in that. You, like Madonna style, thought:

“Oh, I think I’ll just get into this thing that all these jews are talking about!”

And that you did it, because you saw it as a way of cleaning up your life. You describe it that way, don’t you? That at one point some rabbi advised you to like, scrub all the porn stuff off of your personal domain, and you did that. And so it seems to me like that’s probably subconsciously why you gravitated toward it. You saw it as a way of basically cleaning up your life.

Ford: Yeah and I mean, that started many years before I had anything to do with the porn industry. I fell in love with jews and Judaism in the late 1980s.

Tan: Oh! And then you went to porn? I got it backwards?

Ford: Yeah.

Tan: Okay.

[120:00]

Ford’s Journey To judaism

top

Ford: And so for me I first consciously met openly identifying jews at UCLA in 1988. And I was blown away by how smart they were. How articulate they were. The supreme quality of their family life. And I was fascinated, and at the same time I was going through, what turned into six years of bedridden illness! And so my life it just completely fallen apart. I was sick every day, for six years on end!

[Image] UCLA in the 1940s.

And so I was desperately looking for something to inspire me, and to anchor me, and to, you know, just help me get up in the morning. I was just trying to survive! And it was my passion for judaism, and my passion passionate attachment to some individual jews, who I met, who I found just so impressive, that enabled me to overcome those six years of chronic illness. And I’m not sure that a Darwinian approach to life would have enabled me to survive that.

Tan: So, does it bother you at all, and this is something that when I was talking about and researching crypsis and half jews. It occurred to me that a lot of these jews, they complain, some of them complained about the fact that jews tend to push away half jews especially the ones whose, they’re only jewish to their father. But they don’t really seem to resent the jews for that.

Not to the extent that, say Whites. When Whites try to be exclusive to the extent they are and it’s a lot less than jews. Whites seem to incite this deep hatred in people, you know, who aren’t pure White, because when Whites say:

“You know, you’re not White, you’re half something else.”

They get very upset about it. But they don’t seem to get upset with jews in the same way, even though jews are basically more so. They’re maybe more sneakier, quiet about it, the way they say it, but that never caused any resentment from you that you meet these jews who basically look down their nose and don’t accept you, because you’re not really a jew?

[122:27]

Ford: Sure. I have emotions. I was even emotionally affected by some of the things you said tonight. So, …

Tan: I hope as a White man, not as a jew! This imaginary identity you’ve accepted, this identifying with a group that’s not your own. I hope it was because I said something that made you feel shame about your duty to your own people!

Ford: It’s hard to disentangle emotions. So I won’t try, …

Tan: What did I say that upset you?

A jew Told Ford That you Can’t Convert To judaism

top

Ford: I’m not sure, but I’ll admit I noticed my voice cracked at one point. So, I’ll just admit that. You know, I really wish it hadn’t. [laughing] I really wish that I’d be totally beyond that, but I got to be honest at one point my voice cracked! I just got to admit that.

But as far as jews not regarding me is jewish. Only only one woman said that to me seriously. She said:

“I don’t believe anyone can convert to Judaism.”

It did take me aback. And also I kind of disliked it for it. [laughing] And I still have a very clear picture of her face. I know who she is. She’s prominent in the jewish community, and I still remember her name. So I have a, …

Tan: She was the only one that was honest with you. Because that’s actually the predominant view amongst the Orthodox, and beyond, the ultra Orthodox.

Ford: Okay. But if that is the predominant view, then why did they invite me to their homes? My perception, … But wait, let me finish.

Okay, So obviously my perceptions, you know, may be somewhat removed from reality. But my experience of Orthodox judaism is that overall I have been welcomed, according to my merits. Now, I’m a pretty messed up guy in many, many ways. So whatever community I was going to join, I was going to have a lot of problems, because I’m very, I have a lot of problems. But jews bring me into their homes for meals. Jews set me up on dates with other jews. Jews have offered me jobs. Jews have steered me towards good doctors, or good psychotherapists, or a good psychiatrists, or, …

They have they have trusted me to drive their children to school, to pick that children up from school. There is nothing, of which I’m aware, that the jews have not, you know, trusted me with. So I’m not saying every jew, but overall, if you look at my life, my participation in orthodox judaism, there’s no area of orthodox judaism where you’d say:

“Well, he clearly doesn’t belong.”

For example, one of the most clear signs that you’re a part of the community is that they set you up. It’s called a “shidduch”, a “match” and that’s happened to me repeatedly. So why would orthodox jews set me up on matches with women who are born jewish, if they don’t accept me? It wouldn’t make sense. Now I’m sure some of them do not accept me. And much of that has to do with my own problems as a human being, but I’m sure also some of them do except me, because I’m a convert.

Tan: Yeah.

Ford: I could be mis-reading reality. Like I might be completely delusional.

Tan: And you might be. I’m surprised, frankly I’m surprised to hear that, but I’m glad I asked. And I’m not ashamed when I’m wrong about something, or wrong in assuming something so. But, there was something I noticed on Twitter, I don’t have an account on Twitter, an active account, I have a read only account on Twitter, which enables me to create lists.

And I have various lists for different topics. I follow biologists, and scientists in one list. And one of my main lists, and one of the main reasons I rejoined Twitter just to do this, was so that I had a list of these, mostly Jews journalists. And I call it the “echo chamber”. And the funny thing about that, is whenever I find a new one that I haven’t followed yet, and haven’t added to the list, is it will list out, … I know I got a live one, because that’ll show me the ones that I’m already following, that follow that one. And [laughing] I noticed when I went to your Twitter, is you’ve got the “(((echo parentheses)))” and everything.

Ford: Yeah.

Tan: But there’s no jews following you! None of the hundreds of jews that I’m following, all the jewishy jews, all the most toxic jews on Twitter.

Ford: Yeah.

Ford Hasn’t Fooled jews

top

Tan: You haven’t fooled any of them. There’s Nathan Cofnas us who I just followed recently, and added to my list.

But, here’s, I think there might have been one other, but I was struck by that! There’s not a whole bunch of jews that think what you’re saying is, …

I don’t want to, that’s too harsh to put it, but they don’t seem to include you in their circle of other jews.

Ford: Yeah.

Tan: Like I see, it’s a very tight cluster. You find one jew journalist you immediately find a zillion others. And they’re all following each other on Twitter.

[127:51]

Ford: Yeah. I don’t know if you’re what your experience of grade school was like, but I didn’t start school until second grade. And I quickly encountered that there was this like, “cool circle”, you know, …

Tan: Yes.

On Ford Being Rejected By his Peers at School

top

Ford: Their parents were cool, they did cool things, they hung out with each other. And whenever. I tried to join that circle, sometimes they’d be forced by parents getting together, they always let me know that I was not welcome. And so that exclusion is like such a painful thread in my life, that my therapist said I should call my memoir “The Uninvited”. And so what you’re touching on there is something very real. I’ve always been excluded by the cool crowd!

[Image] “The Uninvited?” The Uncensored Memoirs of Luke C Ford click image to enlarge)

Tan: Well maybe that’s why you fell in with the jews, ultimately. Because as a race, as a tribe, that would describe the jews. Although part of it is just part of the parasitism. They are so upset about exclusion, they get so, you know, angry about exclusion they psychopathologize it to anyone who tries to do it. Because it doesn’t serve their interests. Any group of people that excludes them, recognizes them as different and keeps them out, is basically a threat to their survival, because they need a host to feed on.

I don’t get that sense from you, personally. And I never had that problem in grade school myself. I saw cool crowd sometimes I was part of them, sometimes I wasn’t. By the time I got to high school, I was doing my own thing. I had my own thoughts. I had a few close personal friends, but I wasn’t part of any cool circle, and I didn’t care.

[129:28]

Ford As Cover Article in “The jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles”

top

In 2007 I was featured in a cover article of “The jewish Journal of [Greater] Los Angeles”. And the journalist who wrote it, just got so much abuse from fellow jewish journalists, who pretty much all had the attitude that this guy, Luke Ford is like “dirt under my shoe”! Like how could you put this creep on the cover of your publication!

Tan: Is that because of the exposé you had done about jews in porn?

Ford: I’m sure that didn’t help. It was just kind of part and parcel. Yeah I mean, that was unbelievably creepy to, you know, any normal Jews. And then I, mean, other exposes I did about Rabbi child molesters. Like “The jewish Journal of Los Angeles” was angry, because I keep breaking these stories of scandals in the jewish community. And then they’d be forced to go cover them. And they’d rather not do that, because that just creates division, and it loses advertising in it. And it just makes your life very uncomfortable to write negative things about your own community. But, because I kept breaking these stories on my blog, I was forcing them to do things that they didn’t want to do. And so they really hated me for it. And they made sure that I looked like an idiot in their, …

Tan: “Most hated blogger!” Yeah, I remember that phrase.

[Ford laughs]

[130:42]

Yeah, well I attributed to the fact that you’re not really a jew.

Ford: Right.

Tan: And that’s what did those things. And that’s why you didn’t get more of a devastating withering attack on you, from the jews, I don’t know. But then again, I don’t know exactly what they did, or didn’t do to you, anyway. But I would be interested to read about it. If you ever wrote your memoirs and told the truth.

Lawrence Auster, you’re familiar with Lawrence Auster?

Ford: Yes, of course.

Lawrence Auster Admitted That jews were Responsible for Open Borders

top

Tan: Did, you know, that at the end of his life he had this unpublished work, that he published in the last months, or weeks, of his life. And it basically revealed that, yeah, he knew that the jews were responsible for the open borders in the US. And by that point I had already realized he was, you know, an ethnic partisan. And I didn’t like him. But I thought at least he came clean at the end with that book.

[131:47]

Ford: Yeah, you’ll see, I mean, I don’t expect you to watch my streams, but pretty much every stream I rail that every single major American jewish organizations supports immigration amnesty! Which from my perspective is the equivalent of wanting to fill my bedroom with poisonous snakes! So the way that I react to the organized jewish community, these major jewish organizations, is the very same way I’d react to someone trying to fill my bedroom with poisonous snakes!

On Ford’s Hatred of jewish Organizations That are for Open Borders

I hate these organizations and these people! At least in this respect, with an absolute passion! Because they’re trying to pour poison into the bloodstream of my country! And so, I hate them!

Tan: Yeah! Yeah, well it’s ethnic warfare. And it’s got a long history amongst the jews. I remember when I first started to become critical of the jews I was looking around for information and found out. I read, it was some jewish site where they talked about how the jews themselves had been subjected to this open borders treatment back in ancient history, when the Babylonians, or it was either the Assyrians, or the Babylonians.

Maybe both of them and had taken different approaches. And the one, I’m probably mis- remembering here, but the Assyrians had conquered the northern half of Israel at the time. And opened the borders and flooded them with non-jews. And they basically killed the jews in that part of their country. And in the other half they were taken into captivity.

And you know, I long ago realized that a lot of what the jews say about their history has to be interpreted, not just with big grains of salt but is the opposite of what they say. You know, that the Exodus story being a good example. Where, you know, according to the jews they were enslaved, and they escape the evil Pharaoh. It’s more likely based on what you see they’ve been doing within recorded history, that they were victimizing the Egyptians. And they were finally, for one reason, or another, they were expelled, or left, because they had sucked all the blood out of Egypt, worn out their welcome.

Ford: Great. So we’re coming to the two hour mark. I just want to throw it open to you. I’m sure you don’t trust me, but, on the other hand, you don’t completely dismiss everything I say. So is there anything that you’re curious about us up on who’s obviously a gentile in their genetics, obviously gentile in their mannerisms, obviously gentile in their looks, and yet is still to some degree and in the middle of orthodox Judaism. Have also been around the porn industry, which is heavily jewish. And I’ve also written a book on Hollywood. Is there anything that you’re curious about from secular jewish pornographers, to secular Hollywood movie producers, to the most fanatical the orthodox jews. My lived experience, I just want to throw it out to you to in case you anything you’re curious about?

Tan: No. No. I asked the main question about your experiences.

Ford: Excellent.

Tan: I think I’ve said it all. I’m talked out.

Ford: Great! Great! So I just want to read the chats rather than have you leave and then read them, because they are critical so you can feel free to ignore them. But I’d rather do it while you’re here. They’re all from Jay the jew. He says:

“The WASPs invented universalism, not jews.”

He says:

“I grew up orthodox. jews are convert according to jewish law are absolutely jews. Luke’s issues are issues with himself. He is accepted.”

And Jake says, presumably to me:

“This guy’s trying to get into your head!”

So those are all the super-chats. Any final words?

Tan: Yeah, I am trying to get into your head. I’m trying to understand your head. And, I am trying to get into it. But, you know, you invited me to come talk to you, so I’m talking to you.

Ford: Yeah.

Tan: I wouldn’t of talk to “Jake the jew”. I’m not interested at all in what Jake the jew has to say about anything.

Ford — Do You Think I’m Delusional?

top

Ford: So, I’m just curious, … I am lying, because I know I got one more question! When I tried to describe the world as I see it, and as I experience it, you think I’m ten percent delusional, do you think I’m fifty percent delusion, or do you think that I’m making a sincere effort to describe the truth as I see it. What’s your read?

[136:25]

Tan: I get the impression from you, that you’re a White guy. Just, because you are fairly straightforward and honest, in most respects. And I also see the effect though, that identifying with the jews has had on you. And that it’s not good. And I don’t like that part of it. But, yeah, that’s what I think about that.

I think you’re pretty, … you don’t have the same reaction to hearing this criticism of jews, that a jew does. “Jake the jew” is a good example, or the other jews, in my experience, that are confronted with the criticism that Kevin MacDonald has made.

They can’t control themselves! And they just have this irrational hatred of him! They haven’t read his work, but they know they don’t like him! And they really don’t, what they really don’t like, is that he appeals to White people. That White people read his stuff and go, “yeah this guy has a point.” that really really frightens them!

And I think that is what’s going on with Cofnas. I think that’s his thing.

[137:34]

Ford: Okay, great. You think, possibly, you might come back one day?

Tan: If there’s something substantial to talk about, yeah. I don’t generally like these long rambling conversations, but hopefully some of the people listening to me will enjoy hearing what I have to say. And I think I’ve said some new things that I haven’t said before.

So, this was good overall, I think.

Ford: I find when I talk to someone, it always helps me get clarity, or it always helps me come out with ideas that I would not of had, or at least the way I express them, if I hadn’t had the conversation.

Tan: Yep. I just want to leave you with one more thought to get inside your head. Is, be more critical of jews! Blow the whistle on them some more!

If, for some reason White people are, and this is one thing that I didn’t like about MacDonald’s work when I first, not at first, but after I had come to understand the jews, I was like:

“Can’t we make our own criticism of the jews? Why do we have to quote the jews to have some sort of sound, something that appeals to White people?”

Do you understand what I’m saying?

Ford: Yeah!

How Ford Can Help Whites by Blowing the Whistle on jews

top

Tan: We seem to have this need to hear from the jews themselves, these things. That we don’t believe other White people when they say it. And in that respect, you could help, because you have basically an insider’s knowledge about what’s going on. How they do what they do. And you could blow the whistle, like you did, to a certain extent, with porn and the child molestation. I wasn’t aware of that, that you had uncovered that too. Publicize that stuff more!

And I think what you’re doing too in talking to jew critics, in the end, is good for White people as well. Even though, you’ve come at it from an adversarial point of view, you’ve joined with this alien tribe against us. You put the questions fairly enough, and you give us the time to talk about, explain how we think about things. And I think that it will come across to the White people who stumble across this, as, they’ll side with me. They’re not going to take your side.

Ford: Okay. Excellent Tan! And your blog is Age of Treason. So Age of Treason, you’ll find it online: age dash of dash treason dot com. And it goes back for thirteen years. So thank you so much! And I’m going to say good night everybody. Take care man.

Tan: All right, good night.

[140:10]

END

top

============================================

NOTES & LINKS

top

Luke Ford – JQ Debate with Age Of Treason – Mar 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report Interviews TANSTAAFL — 2016 — TRANSCRIPT

After a year’s break from blogging and interviews TANSTAAFL returns with this interview with John Friend at his The Realist Report site. I consider TANSTAAFL to be one of the most insightful commentators on the jewish problem, and in this interview he doesn’t disappoint with his take on what’s being going on in our movement to expose and rid ourselves of the organized evil jewish cabal that dominates our societies.

Topics include; the ongoing jew war on Whites, the meaning of “conspiracy theory”, kikeservatives, Twitter, the jewsmedia, Trump, Bannon, (((the echo meme))), Alt-Right, Richard Spencer, Greg Johnson, Jared Taylor, Hitler and National Socialist Germany, and White racial consciousness — KATANA.

The Realist Report – Tanstaafl: The Jew As A Parasite — TRANSCRIPT

On this edition of The Realist Report, we’ll be joined by Tanstaafl of Age of Treason. Tanstaafl is one of the most knowledgeable and insightful commentators in the alternative, independent media today. In this podcast, we discussed the jewish problem and Jewish parasitism, the root cause of so-called “pathological altruism” prevalent in the White race today, the 2016 president campaign, and related matters.

Talking with Luke Ford

Tanstaafl blog post on this interview with Luke Ford.

============================================

PDF NOTES

top

Version 1: April 22, 2018

* Total words = 24,843
* Total images = 17
* Total A4 pages = 124

Click to download a PDF of this post (4.0 MB):

Luke Ford – JQ Debate With Age Of Treason — TRANSCRIPT

Version History

top

Version 15: Feb 1, 2022 — Added See Also links.

Version 14: Jun 8, 2020 — Re-uploaded images and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version. Corrected minor errors. Added “Top” links to each heading.

Version 13: Apr 22, 2018 — Added PDF of post for download.

Version 12: Apr 21, 2018 — Added link to Age of Treason’s blog post on this interview.

Version 11: Apr 15, 2018 — Added links to previous interviews with Age of Treason.

Version 10: Apr 14, 2018 — Completed adding entries to list of Contents with links.

Version 9: Apr 13, 2018 — Added more entries to list of Contents with links.

Version 8: Apr 8, 2018 — Started on adding a list of Contents with links.

Version 7: Apr 5, 2018 — Added image “The Uninvited“.

Version 6: Apr 3, 2018 — Added 39 minutes of transcript. Total completed = 140 mins. TRANSCRIPT TEXT NOW COMPLETE!

Version 5: Apr 2, 2018 — Added 30 minutes of transcript. Total completed = 101 mins.

Version 4: Apr 1, 2018 — Added 19 minutes of transcript. Added 3 images. Total completed = 71 mins.

Version 3: Mar 31, 2018 — Added 22 minutes of transcript. Added 2 images. Total completed = 52 mins.

Version 2: Mar 30, 2018 — Updated cover image. Added request for volunteers. Added 20 minutes of transcript. Added 4 images. Total completed = 30 mins.

Version 1: Mar 29, 2018 — Published first 10 minutes of transcript.

Do Africans Really Have an IQ of 70 — TRANSCRIPT

admin — Thu, 25 May 2017 12:43:43 +0000

[Here, Canadian Prof. Phillipe J. Rushton at the Amren Conference 2000, reports on his travels to South Africa to find out for himself whether studies showing that Africans have an average IQ of 70, is true or not.

The very idea that there are differences in intelligence between the races has been made into a taboo topic by organized jewry, turning commonsense on its head and forcing people to believe nonsense about “racial equality”. One main purposes why organized jewry pushes this propaganda lie about the “equality of races” is to remove objections from White people to the flooding of their society with masses of low IQ blacks and browns. This is why rare academics, like Rushton, who tell the truth about racial differences are vilified in our jewish controlled media — KATANA.]

_______________________

Click link here to view:

Do Africans Really Have an IQ of 70?

[As of Sep 2019, video removed from YouTube for violating its policy on “hate speech“. To find an alternative upload do a search on YouTube or Bitchute for “Do Africans Really Have an IQ of 70“]

YouTube Description

An except from Prof. J. Philippe Rushton’s speech given at the Fourth American Renaissance Conference in 2000.

Ranging from original IQ testing in the classrooms of South African universities to the study of anatomy, Rushton once more details racial differences and explains why they are important. His latest research supports the findings that the average African IQ is 70.

_________________________

Do Africans Really

Have an IQ of 70?

Published on Apr 14, 2013

TRANSCRIPT

(12:25 mins)

[00:00]

Thank you very much. It’s a pleasure to be here again. The first slide is actually a postcard from South Africa, which I was very fortunate to be able to visit, about a year and a half ago. The New South Africa. It is a fascinating country. When you arrive in Johannesburg, as I did, you see a very modern skyline. In fact, it’s very undifferentiated from any American city, or Canadian city.

The roads are big super highways and the motor cars are modern. Even the people on the streets and driving the cars, for the most part are indistinguishable from North America.

On the other hand, South Africa is a city of, a country of contrasts, and there’s a great deal of traditional society as well.

And the reason I was in South Africa, is, because of this particular chart which summarizes IQ scores that Professor Richard Lynn alluded to in his talk, based on his review, which was published in 1991.

East Asians, both here in the United States and Canada, as well as in their home continents, as Chinese, Japanese and Koreans, average a slightly higher IQ than do White people. Now the average I have there is 106. Sometimes you see the average a little bit lower, around 103. Whites average about 100. A few estimates may place it a little bit higher and say 103. Black Americans average about 85. And again blacks in Canada, or Britain, or in the Caribbean, average around 85, to maybe slightly higher, up as high as 90.

But is the very far bar on that graph which has excited a lot of controversy, the IQ of 70. Because an IQ of 70 is the lowest IQ ever found in the world. And it’s based on twenty to thirty different studies from East, South, West and Central Africa.

And it really doesn’t seem to change, even if you select the population to be studied from people in primary school, people who have got jobs, people in urban centers. In other words, samples that might be thought to have a slightly higher IQ. The average of 70 to maybe 75 consistently comes out.

[Add. Image] The Bell Curve and its authors, Murray and Herrnstein.

When “The Bell Curve” was published in 1994 this really elevated Richard Lynn’s review to international appraisal. And a lot of people in the United States were outraged! And very, very critical!

[Add. Image] The Black and White IQ distributions in America in the NLSY study, as per The Bell Curve.

In fact, they trashed “The Bell Curve” and my own book, partly, because we discussed as a serious piece of data, the average IQ of 70. Indeed, some members who of the academic community who were in favor of “The Bell Curve” decided that this was an embarrassment to their perspective. They actually argued something like:

“Look, perhaps within the academic and intelligentsia circles of America, with ‘The Bell Curve‘ behind us, we just might be able to convince people that IQ is a predictive variable. That it’s partly heritable, that there is a black White difference for whatever reason. But how on earth are we ever going to make headway when there are these extremists, like Richard Lynn and Phil Rushton, …”

And depending on which side they got out of the bed that morning:

“… Charles Murray and Arthur Jensen, who actually take this seriously, that the Africans have an IQ as low as 70 to 75?”

I should put it into context. If White people in Canada, or the United States have an IQ of 70, this is considered borderline mentally retarded. So, to label an entire continent as having an average IQ of 70, in which case fifty percent of the African population fall below an IQ of 70, fifty percent of the African continent by White standards is mentally retarded, is the sort of “preposterous sounding” rhetoric that academics have to face.

So, what’s the cause of that IQ of 70? Can it be real, or is it somehow false?

So I went to South Africa essentially in search of a high IQ African population. I decided I really needed for my own sake to at least satisfy myself, as to what the true, well, what the true African IQ score was. Had Richard Lynn underestimated the African IQ?

[05:06]

So I searched for a top university within Johannesburg.*

______________

[* The University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, is a multi-campus South African public research university situated in the northern areas of central Johannesburg. It is more commonly known as Wits University. The university has its roots in the mining industry, as do Johannesburg and the Witwatersrand in general. Founded in 1896 as the South African School of Mines in Kimberley, it is the third oldest South African university in continuous operation, after the University of Cape Town (founded in 1829), and Stellenbosch University (founded in 1866).
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_the_Witwatersrand]

[Add. Image] The Great Hall of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Some of my colleagues were arguing in saying:

“Look, we know there are many top African students at Harvard and Berkeley and Stanford, or Oxford and Cambridge in England, or even at top-notch universities in South Africa. Boy, if you could only test their IQ’s, you’d find that they were just as bright, or almost as bright as the genius level physicists in North America.”

So I went to South Africa to look for a high IQ group.

I teamed up with a group of people who shall still remain anonymous until the article is actually published in about three months time. We had Africans and Cape coloreds as well as our assistants for those who actually do these tests, and so on. It’s sometimes considered that test takers need to be tested by members of their own race, and so on. We can have the next one [slide].

I went to South Africa myself, rather than let my collaborators collect the data, because I was very concerned that perhaps all the other IQ tests that had been given, had being given under very poor conditions. And I wanted to absolutely standardize the conditions and satisfy for myself, as well as I possibly could, the integrity of the testing.

What we did, we had 300 first year undergraduate psychology students. Half of whom were black and half of whom were White. And we paid them 10 US dollars for taking part. And we had a huge exam hall, so they couldn’t possibly read each other’s answers. It was proctored, monitored by five of our assistants. I myself prowled up and down these rows looking and making sure that everybody did the test studiously. We gave clear instructions that this was a very, very simple test, which I’m going to describe in a minute.

But most people finish it within twenty minutes., but we said you could not leave your seat, in fact, for the first thirty minutes. We figured this would ensure that people didn’t just slapdash out their answers and collect their ten dollars and leave. They may as will stay there and do the answers. But, in fact, it wasn’t even timed. We said you could stay there for an hour and a half and finish the test if you wanted to double-check and quadruple check your answers. So it was a stress [free], it was a perfect testing condition that I can imagine.

Would you go to the next one [slide].

This is one of the tests. It’s a very well-known Raven’s Progress of Matrices. It’s nonverbal, so you don’t even have to use language to explain it. And what you have to do essentially, is to pick from the array of answers at the bottom, the piece that is missing from the top. And if you examine the top there, you can see that there’s a circle with a couple of lines which goes into a circle with a full line, and there’s a square with a couple of lines and you’re looking for what does it turn into. And you look around the bottom then you’ll see that there is, in fact, a square with a full half bottom and that’s the correct answer. Which is number six I believe.

What? [laughing] It is number six, is the correct answer.

Well, the White university students get 90% of this particular item correct. The African students, 77% of them, get it correct. So there’s no question that it’s a very, very easy item for the vast majority of Africans. They know what is expected of them and they answer the question. It’s just that more of them fail this particular item than do the Whites.

Can I have the next one [slide].

Now this is a much more complicated one. So avert your eyes if you didn’t do well in the last one [laughter from the audience].

You now have to choose from an array of eight at the bottom and the whole test is much more difficult., but if you examine, … If you go down the left hand column, for example, of answers, you’ll see that you’ve got three kinds of symbols. You’ve got a diagonal, you’ve got a vertical line, you’ve got a vertical and horizontal, and you got a horizontal line. And so in each of these columns you’re looking for a horizontal, a vertical and a cross. And so what’s missing in the bottom?

[10:00]

And then the clue you’re looking for is the background, you know, do you have a plain background, or do you have a lattice-work, or do you have crossed lattice-work, and so you combine them and eventually you figure it out.

And don’t forget you have a whole minute and a half to do this single item.

Anyway this is another one of the more complicated items and about 88% of Whites pass it, and just under 70% of blacks pass it.

Maybe we will go to the next one [slide].

[Audience noise getting louder] D8! Do you want to put it back on? I didn’t realize.

Was it number one? Oh, it’s number one! D8 is the item number. [laughter] Number one is the correct answer, I’m informed.

Okay, these are the results.

There were 60 of those items all together. And they started off very, very easy. The two you saw were, medium to high, in difficulty. These are the answers. These are the bell-shaped curve that you often see. They’re not smoothed and so they don’t look quite like the bell curves.

But the African scores peaked considerably lower down, than do the White scores. In fact, the average Africans get 44 out of 60 correct. Whereas the Whites got 54 out of 60 correct.

Now, 44 out of 60 correct is roughly, according to the norms of the test, what a fourteen year old Junior High school student in America gets. And these [African students] are first year university students.

Putting it into an IQ context, getting 44 out of 60 correct is an IQ of 84.

And IQ of 84 is substantially higher, it’s about a standard deviation higher than an IQ of 70, which is the [average IQ for the] African population. But it implies that since most university students are one standard deviation higher than the average, and the university students have 84, then the average for the South African population as a whole, must be about 70!

And therefore this search for a high IQ population supported Richard Lynn’s review of all the previous literature, showing an IQ of 70.

[12:25]

NOTES

Below are the original slides that were not used above due to their poor quality.

The average IQs of the world’s indigenous peoples (click image to enlarge):

============================================

Version History

Version 7: Mar 13, 2023 — Updated image links.

Version 6: Jul 14, 2020 — Added See Also with links. Improved formatting.

Version 5: Sep 10, 2019 — Re-uploaded images and the PDF for the katana17.com/wp version. Added image and note that YouTube has removed the video for “hate speech“.

Version 4: Nov 11, 2017 — Updated cover (added croc). Improved formatting. Updated PDF (Ver 3) for download.

Version 3: Jun 1, 2017 — Added Ver 2 of PDF of post for download. Added 3 more image.

Version 2: May 26, 2017 — Added PDF of post for download.

Version 1: Published May 25, 2017

Red Ice: Lana Lokteff Interviews Arthur Kemp — TRANSCRIPT

admin — Sun, 29 May 2016 12:45:14 +0000

[In this friendly interview, Lana Lektoff from Red Ice (Radio 3Fourteen) talks with Arthur Kemp on the past, present and future of White people. Kemp has had long involvement in the White “movement” and has written several books on the subject.

Although he makes many good observations, I would consider his significant weakness to be his downplaying of the jewish problem. His focus is on the symptoms of jewish rule, that is, the deluded liberals who are the outward manifestation of jewish power over the masses through their control of the media, etc.

Also his optimism that Whites will survive is not reassuring as, by “survive” he means that perhaps a few million will remain after the West crumbles.

That said, this is a useful interview in that it gives us an insight into the mind of someone who is on our side and well informed on many issues, yet despite years in this movement, still hasn’t grasped the extent of the central issue of jewish control over us — KATANA.]

Red Ice: Lana Lokteff

Interviews Arthur Kemp

March of the Titans:

The Rise & Fall

of Caucasian Civilization

https://redice.tv/radio-3fourteen/march-of-the-titans-the-rise-and-fall-of-caucasian-civilization

Click on the above link, or copy the link into your browser to view the audio.

Published on May 16, 2016

Arthur Kemp was born in Southern Rhodesia in 1962. Educated in South Africa, he holds a degree in Political Science, International Politics and Public Administration, having studied at the University of Cape Town and the University of South Africa. He is the owner of Ostara Publications and the author of eleven books, including March of the Titans: The Complete History of the White Race.

Arthur joins us for a look at how the aspects of racial homogeneity and racial disillusionment (multiculturalism) have historically contributed to the rise and fall of civilizations.

We begin by considering the essential questions of what causes culture and what happens when a civilization’s creators vanish. Arthur talks about the misconceptions of early English colonialism and the vastly different process of mass foreign invasion transpiring in the West today.

He addresses the proclivity of the White race to explore the world and provide humanitarian support to the less fortunate, along with the consequences of these interventions.

We discuss some logistics of the Out of Africa theory and the role of environment in racial differences, touching on the bureaucratic baloney that thwarts modern day archaeologists from properly investigating tremendous troves of ancient human remains holding clues of Europeans’ origins in the Northern Hemisphere.

Then, Arthur explains the dire reality of the population replacement events being orchestrated by the West’s rulers, and we deliberate how to wake up the ill-informed masses to their looming extinction.

Kemp also gives an account of his life in South Africa during the ANC’s takeover, relating the hard fact that demographics ultimately dictate the rules.

Our conversation rounds off with thoughts on the viability of recruiting quality Europeans to create a great ethnostate and the terrific potential that exists when enough Whites are able to unlearn their self-defeatist programming and abandon the egalitarian fantasies driving their cultures to demise.

RELEVANT LINKS

Ostarapublications.com

Transcript

[00:00]

Lana Lokteff: Arthur Kemp I’m delighted and honored to have you here. So, thanks for joining us.

Arthur Kemp: It’s a great pleasure Lana. I think you and Red Ice do a great job and I’m very honored to be on your show.

Lana: Well it’s refreshing to speak with you, because I’ve actually tried doing a couple White archeology shows with some racialists and it never turns out good! And unfortunately it can come across a little wacky sometimes. I’m sure you’ve come across that too.

Arthur:Unfortunately, I’ve had more than my fair share of dealing with wacky people, so I know exactly what you’re talking about. But, it doesn’t necessarily have to be. I think what happens a lot of the time, is that people tend to over play what the reality is and sometimes if they’re not not happy with the reality is, they add to it. I think that’s quite common amongst, not only people in this so-called White nationalist movement, but probably everywhere.

Lana: Yes. But when I mentioned to our listeners that you are coming on, a lot of people responded in, saying how, “March of the Titans” was a major eye opener for them, and for me, you know, I just love Euro-centric history and archaeology. “March of the Titans” is a masterful body of work, so I wanted to read a quote to kind of summarize it.

“Most importantly revealed in this work is the one true cause of the rise and fall of the world’s greatest empires. That all civilizations rise and fall according to their racial homogeneity and nothing else. A nation can survive wars, defeats, catastrophes, but not racial dissolution”

Aka, diversity, right? So Rome didn’t collapse from debauchery and decadence. So where do you like to begin when approaching the subject with new-comers?

[Image] Arthur Kemp’s book, “March of the Titans”.]

Arthur: Well, the very first way to understand it, is to take a step back away from any idea or denigrating other people. That’s probably a very important basis to start with. It’s one of the biggest problems in this so-called movement is that it seems to be based more on putting other people down. You don’t have to put anyone else down. All you have to do is stand back and look at it from a purely objective point of view.

What causes culture? What causes civilization and how do these things change? Now my basis, whenever anyone asks, “Can you explain what you mean?” I always say, look it’s very simple. Each culture, each civilization is a product of a certain people. So for example, the Chinese people create a Chinese civilization. The Japanese people created Japanese civilization. The Australian Aborigines created Australian Aborigine civilization. And the Europeans created European civilization. Now you don’t have to be subjective about any of them. Of course, we all like to think that our own version is better, but that’s a subjective opinion.

We can be objective about it. We can say:

“Yes, the Europeans created European civilization”

and so on, and so forth. Now if you, and generally everyone will say, yes well that’s obvious. Obviously Europeans created European civilization, obviously Chinese people created Chinese civilization and so on, and so forth. Once you got them to agree with that very basic and very simple fact, then all you do, you say to them:

“Well what happens if all the Chinese people vanished tomorrow? What would happen to Chinese civilization?”

“Oh, well, probably it would disappear.”

Yes, obviously if the Japanese people disappeared tomorrow would anything remain of Japanese civilization? No! If the Australian Aborigines people disappeared tomorrow, would anything remain of their culture and their civilization? No! So therefore, obviously if the European people disappear, nothing will remain of their culture or their civilization. Yes. Everyone will say, “Well, yes, that’s pretty obvious.” Well, there you go. That is the cause of the explanation of the rise and fall of all civilizations.

If the people who created the civilization disappear, for any reason, whether it be replacement through mass immigration, whether it be through extermination in warfare, or death by disease or whatever, if a founding population disappears that founding population’s culture and civilization will disappear with it. And once you’ve got that particular, and that’s a very basic, it’s not a sort of radical position and there’s almost no one I’ve ever met anywhere in the world that’s been able to disagree with that.

Once you’ve got them to understand that basic principle, then all you have to do is show that every great civilization in history, no matter what it’s race, no matter what it’s origin, that every great civilization has vanished once the people who created it vanish. And if you can get that very, very simple, very basic principle, then history stops becoming a jumble of meaningless states and events and you can see a very clear flow in it.

[04:53]

Lana: And you’ve done a beautiful job outlining a lot of these civilizations. Egypt’s the classic one that people like to point to. You also mention, like the Great Depression, or Germany after World War Two, how all these countries have been able to pull themselves up after these events because racially they’re still homogenous, right?

Arthur:That’s exactly the point. Germany is actually a good case in point, what you’re talking about, because a lot of people say:

“Oh, the Roman Empire collapsed because the barbarians sacked Rome in 453 and that was the end of Rome,”

In actual fact, the Celts sacked Roman in 212 BC, but Rome came back. Rome eventually conquered the Celts that sacked Rome. So you’re absolutely right. People who believe, for example, that a military defeat would be the cause of collapse of an empire, you’re right. You know, eighty percent of Germany was flattened to the ground in 1945 and by 1955, 1960, it was once again the strongest nation in Western Europe.

If debauchery, or moral degeneracy would be the reason for the collapse of a civilization, then I can assure you, Britain should have collapsed in the 1600s! You look at the debauched histories of the royal families of Britain, and I’m not picking on Britain in particular, but it is a good example. If you look at the murders of of each other, and brothers killing each other, and all sorts of horrible things, moral debauchery should have finished Britain many, many, centuries ago. And of course that didn’t happen. Precisely because, as you said there, as long as a founding population remains in place, the longer it remains the majority population and as long as it remains homogenous, that society will continue to be in existence.

Lana: I know this is nearly impossible to answer, but according to history from what you’ve seen, what or who in these societies begins pushing towards diversity, if you will? Yeah.

Arthur: Yes, now that’s the great question. I know a lot of people say:

“Oh, it’s the Jews” or, “Oh it’s this” or, “It’s Christianity” or, “it’s this religion” or, “that religion” or, “this belief system”.

I’m sorry to say, that in almost every case that I can think of, it’s simple ignorance of the long term racial consequences of using foreign labor.

And the example that I always use is, for example, if someone had invented a time machine, which would be great, because if someone had invented a time machine and I could go back to pre Civil War Atlanta in Georgia and fly out there and pick up one of those big cotton plantation owners, who’s got his five hundred negro slaves slaving away in the field, picking it’s cotton, making him and his family a very rich man. Put him in a time machine and take him to Atlanta Georgia in 2016. And drop them off in the middle of Atlanta and say,:

“Look here, the direct consequence of you and small number of plantation owners who use black labor is that your great grandchildren cannot walk the streets of Atlanta Georgia. Cannot walk the streets of your state’s capital anymore, because the place is now taken by blacks and it’s now unsafe for White people to walk in the street”.

I’m quite sure that that plantation owner never dreamed, never wanted in his wildest imagining, never wanted that for his great grandchildren. But he didn’t understand the long term consequences of using foreign labor.

And I think this played out in Egypt, has played out in Sumeria. This played out in every great civilization that has fallen, or in South Africa or in Rhodesia. I don’t think they understood the consequences of using it, so it’s easy to blame others, and certainly others do have a role to play, I’m not denying that, but it’s, I’m afraid, the truth which hurts, is that it’s quite often White people themselves.

Lana: Yeah.

Arthur: Which don’t have an understanding of the global, geopolitical, racial consequences of their actions.

Lana: Now one thing, you know, the English always get blamed for it’s colonialism and I always say, English colonialism cannot at all be compared to the mass invasion of today. But what are your thoughts on English colonialism, was it wrong?

Arthur: Yes. I’m a firm anti-colonialist. There are two ways to approach colonialism. The colonialism that’s done on a Ragnar Red Beard, “Might is Right” principle, is an immutable law of nature. Almost every colonization process has been probably undertaken on that basis. Just to divert for one second, you do know of course that the first colonisers of anywhere were in fact non-Europeans colonizing Europe?

Lana: Yes.

[10:00]

Arthur: It’s a factual inaccuracy to say that Europeans started the colonization process. In actual fact the first great colonizing invasions were of non-Europeans into Europe. So if anyone should be screaming for reparations it should be the Europeans.

Now leaving that aside, if you look at the English colonization process, when, for example, if you going to colonize a place properly and I’m not divorcing it from any moral issues, because I believe there is a moral issue at play here. But, if you’re going to divorce it from a moral issue, the way you colonize a place, is you move in and you push out, you eradicate the native inhabitants and you occupy the territory and you take it over, OK.

A good example of English colonialism that was done this way would have been Australia or the United States of America. They simply pushed the natives, I don’t want to call them the native Americans because they weren’t even native, I want to call them the American Indians. They simply pushed them out through mass immigration and they simply took their lands and they colonized them. They fought them, defeated the Indians and that was it. That’s how America was colonized. That’s how Australia was was colonized.

Now in those days, morally, no one thought anything of it, because that’s how all of history had run. I think that we nowadays have a reached stage where all of society has advanced and we can take moral judgments on things.

Say, for example, and it is a great case. The Jews all move into Palestine, beat up the Palestinians, kick the Palestinians out, torture them, oppress them. I think we have a right to say,:

“Listen, time has moved on, this is no longer 1700s or 1800s where people could get away with such immoral or morally questionable things as colonizing and beating up the native population.”

And therefore Israel should be criticized for colonizing Palestine at the expense of the Palestinians. Because that’s essentially what they’ve done. They’ve adopted the Ragnar Red Beard approach of driving the Palestinians out.

Now that would have, might have been acceptable, in the 1800s or 1700s as the English did in America or Australia, but it’s no longer acceptable in this day and age. Going back to, if you look at English colonization, for example, in where I was born, Rhodesia, or what was then Southern Rhodesia, when I was born there. You look at English colonization there, that was wasn’t done on a on a “might is right” principle. That was done on a White supremacist principle, where small number of Whites moved in and established a government to rule over the many, many more millions, in fact, of blacks.

And now, a White supremacist government, apart from it’s moral questionability, is also doomed to failure, because it ignores the demographic principle which governs all society. Those who make it, and the majority of people in a society determine the nature and direction of that society. And that’s why White supremacism never works. And it’s actually a recipe for failure. Apartheid in South Africa was another system like that. Designed on minority rule over majority population, was guaranteed to fail over the long term. No matter what the short term policy applications were.

So, yes we can now, from the advantage of many centuries later, say:

“Well it wasn’t really fair of the English to colonize North America,”

or the Germans, or the French who all took part in it, because they all took part in it.

But I think we can now look back and say, “Look ,it was done”, we can draw a line underneath it. We can say we now deal with the reality of the situation as we have it now. And if we adopt the principle that it was wrong for the English to colonize any part of the world, or it was wrong for the Europeans to colonize any part of the world, therefore it is also wrong for the Third World to colonize any part of the world as well. So, if it was wrong for the English to colonize America, but that’s not done, then it is also wrong for the Mexicans to colonize America in this day and age as well. Or it is wrong for Africa to colonize Europe in this day and age, just because Europeans colonized Africa in the 1600 or 1700s.

Lana: Now, would you say there’s a difference there between colonialism and exploration because the, you know, White people, we explored, you know, we cataloged plants and animals, we learned so much, right?

Arthur: Huge! It’s huge difference between exploration and colonization. Absolutely massive! You’re right, absolutely right!

I think that exploring the world was something that Europeans had to do. It’s no coincidence that the Europeans explored the world and no one else did. I think that’s an inherent search for xxx which is still valid to this very day. And, certainly, but I think, … As I said to you, I’m not, I’m not going to condemn people for what they did in 1600 or 1700. That was the norm at the time.

[15:00]

It’s like condemning people for not allowing women to have the vote, you know. Most people, I know there’s some people in the Alt Right who don’t think so, but most people today would not suggest that women shouldn’t have the vote. But, you know, one hundred years ago it was an accepted principle that woman didn’t have the vote. Now one can sit nowadays and moralize on that, or you can say:

“Well that was the norm of the time. I’m not going to condemn anybody for holding the views which were dominant at that time, but these are the values which we have today.”

And so you’re right. I think colonization is morally, … You can judge colonization only in the morals of the time. You can judge it by today’s morals and standards.

Lana: Yeah I suppose the better thing to do, would have been to explore and perhaps help or interact with people who wanted helping or wanted to trade information and learn skills from each other, but then leave afterwards and not settle there for good. Because there’s a difference between having an exchange and permanently living there which creates problems, right?

Arthur: Correct. And I think the immigration crisis that faces the First World today is the direct product of colonization. Let me explain it to you, this way. And I can explain this to you, because of my own personal experiences in Rhodesia and South Africa.

Before the arrival of the White colonists, the average black reproduction rate, the average black woman would have had maybe, from the time of puberty to the time of whenever they would die, and they died in an early age, in the forties, or something like that. The time from puberty to the time of the cessation of their reproductive life cycle, put it that way, they would have, maybe, twenty pregnancies. But, before the advent of White colonization, of those twenty pregnancies, probably seventeen or eighteen would die, either in pregnancy, or would be stillborn, or would starve to death, or whatever the case was.

So their population numbers were always in proportion to the land’s ability to support their subsistence existence. OK, so along comes Whitey, along comes the White colonist, sometimes with a gun in one hand and a Bible in the other, or sometimes just holding a Bible, or sometimes just holding a gun. But whatever it is, he comes along and he sets up a society and he says:

“Wow! Look at this infant mortality rate. It’s terrible! How can you have infant mortality rate of ninety five percent? We’ve got to fix this! It’s our Christian duty. It’s our moral duty. It’s whatever duty, to do this!”

And so, what they do is they bring in hospitals, they bring in schools, they bring in medicine, they bring in education. Now, the black woman is no longer having a 95 percent infant mortality rate, now she has a ten or fifteen percent infant mortality rate. So what happens to the black population? It’s skyrocketing! And that’s what happened in South Africa.

There’s a good good test, if you look up and you can find it online now days. You can find the 1913 Encyclopedia Britannica, the famous eleventh edition. It’s the grandest Encyclopedia Britannica of all time. And you look up there, they have a section there on the Transvaal which was the Boer Republic that was taken over, occupied, militarily occupied by the British during the second Anglo-Boer War. And the British conducted the first census in the Transvaal, in the ZAR. They found, the census figures and I’m speaking speaking under correction, but I’m pretty sure the figures are close to this, that they were just under 300,000 Europeans in the Transvaal. And there were 690,000 Africans in the Transvaal in 1907.

And if you look at the disproportionate population growth between 1907 and say 1990, which is not long. It’s 80 something odd years. If you look at the disproportionate growth you will find that by 1990 there were, I think, 1.2 million Europeans and, I think, in the region of 12 to 14 million Africans. Now the population growth is exclusively due to the introduction of White medicine and White education. Giving them jobs and giving them employment. In other words artificially boosting their population.

Now this is happened all over Africa and it’s still going on, all this Doctors Without Borders and Live Aid and, you know, “help the starving Ethiopians”. What happens? Whites go over there and interfere with the natural, nature’s ordering of the population and all of a sudden you’ve got these huge extra populations who are incapable of feeding themselves, incapable of organizing any agriculture, incapable basically of doing anything except breeding more. And whoops! And now they’re pouring into Europe and the same thing’s happening in South and Latin America, as well. That’s why you’ve got the problem in the US where, you know, where all this population from Central and South America, where’s it all coming from? It’s simply they’ve been bred up by White colonialism.

[20:39]

Lana: That’s why we’re always trying to create order everywhere. And I’ve heard with apartheid, one of the things is they were trying to create peace among the tribes, right? Because all the tribes were also killing each other. But that’s one way the population was also staying low, right?

Arthur: Yeah, I don’t think intra-tribal warfare killed so many as the disease and starvation. People who aren’t familiar with Africa, or, let me rephrase that, Europeans who aren’t [are] liberals, who aren’t familiar with Africa don’t understand exactly how backward Africa was. Another one of my favorite stories, just here to illustrate this point, is when you read the diaries of Dr Kenneth Livingstone, the great explorer, Livingstone, you know, the guy, Stanley, “Dr. Livingstone, I presume?”, you know, that story?

[Image] Stanley meets Dr. Livingstone. Leading an expedition of approximately 200 men, Stanley headed into the interior from the eastern shore of Africa on March 21, 1871. After nearly eight months he found Livingstone in Ujiji, a small village on the shore of Lake Tanganyika on November 10, 1871.

Lana: Yeah.

Arthur:If you read his diaries, and he describes going into an African village in 1871. So that’s not that long ago, in the grand scheme of things. And he describes, he sees, he’s got a donkey and a cart. He couldn’t use a horse because the horses all died from African horse sickness. He had a donkey, which is somehow resistant to African horse sickness. Anyway, and he describes in this diary so nicely, how he’s driving up into this village of what, 4,000 souls and all the Africans come out and they’re all stark naked because they haven’t got cloths. And they’re all standing on the side of this path, this rudimentary path that he’s coming, trotting up there in his cart and his donkey. And he sees all their heads going round and round and round, like they watching some kind of big Ferris wheel. And he can’t work it out. Why are their heads moving? Maybe it’s some type of tribal greeting, and then he realizes, they’re looking at the wheels on his cart. They’ve never seen the wheel before!

Lana: Yeah, I know.

Arthur: So you’re dealing with people who, a hundred [odd] years ago, didn’t have the wheel!

Lana: Yeah.

Arthur: So, there’s no way they’re going to be resistant to any type of bacteria or any type of medicine, or anything like that at all. So, yeah, tribal warfare played it’s role, but tribal warfare would be a summer activity, it wasn’t a winter activity. They didn’t fight each other during the winter. And let’s be honest, Europeans have a good long history of tribal warfare as well.

Lana: Yes they do! We do better than anyone else I think. I’ve actually been through Africa and I’ve been to parts of Africa, out in the bush, where I was the first White person a lot of these kids saw. I have photos of that. So, yeah I’d seen firsthand how some of them live and they still have their witch doctors and all kinds of fun stuff.

Arthur: Oh no, the witch doctors in Birmingham, in England nowadays, you can find, you can look them up in the local newspaper. Dr Ujuubi, to cure impotence, financial trouble and anything else. [laughing] Well, I’m not joking. The Third World moves with them.

Lana: Now what about the, “Out of Africa Theory”? Obviously, I know, you’re not a believer of it. I don’t either. But, you know, if we come from Africa, then what’s the problem? Why can’t we be there, right?

Arthur: Well, that is true. First of all, there are number of problems with the, “Out of Africa Theory”. I remember having this great discussion with Dr Philip Rushton, once. Sadly he’s passed away, but, because he was a great believer in the, “Out of Africa Theory”. But, the discussion that I had with him on this basis was, number one: That the time periods that we’re talking about, the continents weren’t even formed properly, so you can’t even say out of Africa, really if one is going to believe the continental shifts and drifts and that type of thing.

Secondly, the, “Out of Africa Theory” relies on genetic mutation over a period of between 120,000 and 150,000 years. That’s the most common time period which they say that the great migration out of central Africa came and then branched both into Asia and one group went into Europe and then they mutated out according to their environments, you know, the theory.

Now, as I said to Dr Rushton at the time, if this is true, if this is truth, this would imply, in fact, people are walking, right? Because they haven’t got cars, they haven’t got wagons and they haven’t got anything, they’re walking, they’re walking a hell of a long way to get to Europe and to get to Asia. Normal migration periods would take hundreds of years, to cross even a small part of Africa, never mind those huge distances. So we’re actually probably looking at genetic mutation period of maybe half of the time. Maybe 50,000 years, maybe 60,000 years?

[25:24]

So what you’re trying to tell me, is that the, “Out of Africa Theory” means that some form of Homo habilis, some form of semi-ape thing, sort of jumped out of the trees, ran across the plains of Africa. Ran, ran into Asia, ran into and over the Alps into Europe and within 50,000 years evolved into Nordics, evolved into Mongoloid racial types, evolved into the various specific racial types that we have today. And I just can’t see it! You know, I just I just cannot see it!

And for me the killer argument against that theory, is, of course, the existence of racial differences. Because that theory relies on a belief that environment causes racial, causes genetic mutations, i.e., Europeans have light skins because they live in the cold north and they need to absorb much more sunlight and that’s how they got light eyes and light hair and I don’t know what else. And that Africans are black because they live in that deep hot, deep, deep south of the southern hemisphere, where it’s very dark and very hot all the time and you don’t need to absorb a lot of vitamin D, and that’s why they got dark skins and all this type of stuff.

My problem with that theory is that the Asians, the Mongoloids, because I’m generalizing now because they are different subgroups amongst them, as well, but, they all live in the northern hemisphere as well. And if the north-south division theory holds true, which is a critical part of the, “Out of Africa Theory”. If the north-south genetic mutation theory holds true, people living in, all people living in the northern hemisphere should look the same. Because they are subjected to the same environmental influencing.

Lana: Right.

Arthur: Harsh winters, relatively warm, sometimes moderate summers, back into a harsh winter. They should all look [the same], but, of course, they don’t. You’ll find that people living on the same latitude, or longitude, whichever it is [latitude], with the ones that run horizontally across the globe, I can’t even recall which one it is now. I’ve got advanced dementia! You’ll find that people living in the same geographic spread look very different, and if environment was the cause of genetic mutations they would should all look the same.

Lana: But we’ve also had some interesting White people have had interesting migrations. I know some of this is probably, obviously later, but we had European mummies in China, we have White Indians in America, White xxx of Peru, the Canary Islands, Easter Island, I mean it’s just really all over the place where you see, you know, White civilizations and they have just mysteriously disappeared. But, we seem to have been everywhere one point, but you include a mural in your book of a White prisoner being sacrificed by a xxx warrior’s. So is it farfetched to say, maybe there have been, you know, White genocides in the past?

[Image] A mural, reconstructed in life-size showing a white prisoner, with long blond hair, being sacrificed by Chichen Itza warriors.

Arthur: Yes. I’m absolutely convinced of it. Depending on how you define White genocides. For example, the Tarim Basin mummies which is the Indo-European group that got to western China, the Gobi Desert.* They were genocided out, not through physical extermination, but certainly through mixing with the locals, the people of the Tarim Basin to this day speak Turkic**, they don’t speak Chinese. And you can see the actual physical characteristics, it’s clearly a mix between Chinese and European.

[* The Tarim mummies are a series of mummies discovered in the Tarim Basin in present-day Xinjiang, China, which date from 1800 BCE to the first centuries BCE. The mummies, particularly the early ones, are frequently associated with the presence of the Indo-European Tocharian languages in the Tarim Basin, although the evidence is not totally conclusive and many centuries separate these mummies from the first attestation of the Tocharian languages in writing. Victor H. Mair’s team concluded that the mummies are Europoid, likely speakers of Indo-European languages.

Source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarim_mummies]

[** The Turkic languages are a language family of at least thirty-five languages, spoken by Turkic peoples from Southeastern Europe and the Mediterranean to Siberia and Western China. The Turkic languages originated in a region spanning Western China to Mongolia from where it expanded to Central Asia and farther west.]

[Image] Map of Eurasia showing the location of the Tarim Basin and the areas occupied by cultures associated with the settlement of the Tarim Basin.

Now the whole, it’s still very much up for debate and it’s made more difficult by the establishment’s refusal to investigate the full extent of who were the original North and South Americans. The the very basic evidence that we have now, indicates that there were certainly a European presence of some sort. It’s very difficult to say exactly whether that was a dominant presence or whether it was an xxx presence. There’s certainly more than enough evidence to indicate that this was.

The Tenochtitlan sacrifice that you’re talking about I think those were probably just Canary Island wash overs who managed to, who were caught in the cross current, the same one that took Columbus to that part of the world, and they ended up in what is today modern Mexico. And they probably got sacrificed for their trouble.

[30:07]

I’m not sure one can go as far as saying that those were huge numbers of Whites who were genocided. But, as I said, all that’s speculation. We don’t know if one day, perhaps, there is a reordering of governments in society which will allow proper investigation of these things, which will allow proper analysis of ancient remains in North America and Central America. Which as I’m sure, you know, is currently forbidden by law. The law which George Bush brought in forbidding anyone except Indian, American Indians, from claiming ancient remains on the presumption that they are Mongoloid origin.

If that gets reversed and we’re able to start doing, for example, what I’d really love to do, what would really be interesting, for example, would be to investigate the graves around the Nevada cliff dwellings.

Lana: Oh yeah.

Arthur:That would be really interesting to have a look at the skeletal and find out what DNA we could extract from the tooth enamel of graves in that area. Because the Nevada cliff dwellings, for example, are so un-Indian, that it simply isn’t true. They are particularly European looking cliff dwellings and they’re just not replicated anywhere else in the entire North American continent. So, that would indicate that they that was built by people different from the American Indians. But until the political climate changes, I don’t think we’re going to have to make any final call on that.

[Image] Cliff Palace, Mesa Verde’s largest cliff dwelling.

Lana: And that’s unfortunate. I want to go back to an idea, we were talking about colonizers. Now, in your opinion, you know, we always hear that Europeans, they were also fleeing to find better conditions. So was it wrong for them to abandon Europe and go somewhere else? Should they have stayed there and fought hard for their continent?

Arthur: Well, [during] the Age of Exploration and the Age of Colonization, Europe wasn’t under a direct threat at that stage of the game. The great non-European invasions had all be more or less defeated by the time of the Age of Exploration and the Age of Colonization. And yes, you can see, for example, it’s no coincidence that Christopher Columbus was sent off to discover the Americas, he didn’t know he was discovering the Americas, of course, but he was sent off across the Atlantic in the same year that the Moors were finally driven out of Spain, 1492. And that’s not a coincidence. The Turks being the Ottomans, the Muslims had been defeated at the gates of Vienna in 1683, and they were being pushed back all the time. So it’s no coincidence that the European colonization process started once the great non European invasions of Europe had been defeated and turned back and were being driven back.

So, I don’t think it’s accurate to say that that they were fleeing anything. It was just the natural European inquisitiveness. They knew where India was and they were looking for a better place to, or quicker way to get to India. And probably more of an economic motivation. If anybody did flee Europe, it was probably to escape Feudalism. Probably for economic reasons. You know, most of the early homesteaders who came to the US, unless you were born into privilege and wealth in Europe, you basically had no chance of acquiring land or property of your own. In this regard, I’m reminded of what Thomas Jefferson wrote about, he warned America are about building cities and he said, very famous quote, he said:

“No we can’t build cities because we will soon become as heaped up with each, upon each other, and become as corrupt as the Europeans”.

Warned against cities, would have been a lot more ideal to keep America a more rural place I think.

Lana: I agree. Definitely agree.

Arthur:Yeah. It suddenly struck me, I think it was the Roman historian, Terence, I think it was Terence who wrote about Rome in the year 200 BC 200 and something. That Rome, that metropolis to which all evil things in the world are drawn. [chuckling] the nature cities hasn’t changed much.

Lana: Have you explored much of Scandinavia and some of the mounds up there? It’s amazing how they don’t do any digging around Scandinavia. It’s like it’s not allowed, they don’t want people to know about their Nordic heritage up there.

Arthur: Very much so, very much. Unfortunately that is not only limited to Scandinavia. The last time I was in Malmo in Sweden I was really disappointed, because Malmo is becoming a hell, as you know. But, yes, you’re right.

[35:00]

Unfortunately that anti-Nordicism is not limited to Scandinavia. I’m sure you’re aware of the discoveries made by a Canadian archaeologist, a year or two ago. She found another Viking settlement in Canada. And she was, I forget her name, offhand, but she was just sacked from the job. The Canadian government withdrew her subsidies. She had all her papers seized, it was unbelievable!

Incredible, you know, this goes in line with everything I’m saying about the physical climate. Unfortunately you’re allowed to be black conscious, you’re allowed to be Hispanic conscious, you’re allowed to be American Indian conscious, you’re allowed to have a Black caucus, you’re allowed to have a Black History Month, you’re allowed to have a Jewish History Month, you’re allowed to have an American Indian History Month. But God help you, if you have a White History Month! Then you’re just a racist.

Lana: Well, we’ll just have to do it and not care about what people think.

Arthur: I think that’s a stage where it’s come to. I was greatly amused to see a recent RamzPaul video where we finally address the issue of being labeled, … Where he said, look people actually just don’t care about the labels. They are so used if you say anything, you just get accused of it. If you say, well Israel, … Why does the Jewish lobby in America object to Donald Trump suggesting that they build a wall on the border with Mexico? Where Israel’s got a huge wall around it. So it’s good for Israel but bad for America. And their only answer is, “Oh, anti-semite, anti-semite!” and, you know, it doesn’t work any more. I don’t [think] anyone cares anymore.

Lana: By the way, RamZPaul, we’re friends and he said to tell you that he loved your book, so it’s funny that you bring him up, because he asked me to say, “Hi!”

Arthur: Oh, that is great, I’ve never actually spoken to him. I must try to get hold of him. I was watching his latest or what I presume is his latest videos, “How to beat anti-Semitism” I think that’s the latest. Very good video to watch, very, very good video.

[Image] Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8t6s-9S3Ys

Lana: Now, you made a good point I wanted to come back to, because a lot of people worry about, you know, the European population. But we hear there’s more Europeans alive today than ever in history, right? We’ve gone through massive, you know, population losses in the past, so your idea that we don’t have to be so worried about that. It’s not as dire as we think, right?

Arthur: Well, it is on the face of it. I wrote a book called, “Nova Europa” which you might or might not be familiar with, and I’m made this exact point. I said:

“It’s ironic that although there’s never been as many Europeans alive, ever in history as there are today. In reality we have never been so close to extermination as we are today”.

[Image] Nova Europa: European Survival Strategy in a Darkening World

Because each time in history where there’s been a collapse, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Sumeria, and so on. For each time when there has been a collapse there has always been a White heartland which has been able to provide a new wave of European gene pool. A new wave of explorers, settlers, this type of thing. We’re reaching the stage now where most of our heartlands are now being actually taken over.

And if Europe should fall, and I must admit it, I’m pessimistic about Western Europe, if Western Europe should fall there’s actually not that many places left over. So, No you’re right, we do have very large numbers. But unfortunately we are probably in the most dire situation that we have probably ever been in before.

And, once again, it’s largely Europeans’ fault, I’m sorry to say.

Lana: Yep.

Arthur: If I look, … Let’s use Germany as an example, right? Now I know there’s lots of causes of this and that’s a separate topic, but let’s look at Germany today, where they say they’ve had 1.2 million, quote, refugees, unquote, come into Germany. It’s a lot more than that, because they don’t even know how many have come in. It’s an absurd situation. Apart from the fact they’re not refugees at all, because they’ve all left Turkey, which is a safe country. Anyway, they’ve poured into Germany now, and the Germans are trying to cope with them. They’re raping, rampaging, criminal rampage through Germany and through the surrounding countries. And they’ve bombed Paris, they’ve bombed Brussels. It’s just mad what’s going on! It is absolutely insane, and you would have thought anyone who had half a brain cell, not even half a brain, but half a brain cell, would say:

“Woo, this is a bad idea! This is a really bad idea” and they would vote for someone who would say right now, “End this! Not having any more of this. We’re going to throw this lot out. They can all go back and, you know, we’re going to be humanitarian about it to help them and their countries. We’ll stop backing the rebels in, so-called rebels in Syria and will stop the war in Syria by backing Assad. And the good guys in Syria will crush ISIS! That way, we won’t arm them and supply them under the guise of being moderate rebels, and we’ll make sure we’ll help them rebuild Syria, the Syrian cities in Syria. We won’t invite them all to come here and smash our place.”

[40:25]

So, you would think that would in the logical, consequential, anyone anyone normal would say that. So what do they do? They have elections in Germany and, “Wow!” thirty percent of them or twenty five percent of them vote for Alternative für Deutschland, the Alternative for Germany. Which, between you and me and pardon the language, is a real half assed party!

Lana: I’ve gathered that.

Arthur: Well, now they’re saying the right things but they’re not saying things which need to be said. Basically, what needs to be said is:

“Woo, now that’s it! Stop immigration and all non-White immigrants out!”

Lana: They don’t want to look like Nazis, right? They are the alternative to the right.

Arthur: But they don’t even believe [that]. That they actually expelled some some branch somewhere outside Frankfurt, I think it was. Which actually struck a local election deal with the NDP. They actually expelled them, because they dared to have an alliance with the NDP, which is saying the things which need to be done.

Anyway, the point being that only twenty five percent of the voters in those three areas, the three states which voted recently, dared vote for the NDP. Which means that sixty five or seventy five percent of voters still voted for the parties who bringing all the invasion in!

Now that’s a really worrying figure, that’s a really worry, … It’s only worrying if you are unlike me. Because I’ve crossed the psychological Rubicon and I’ll explain what I mean by that in a second. That’s really worrying if you think:

“Wow, anyone in their right mind would say, no we need to stop this!”

And, you know, what, you look at the Front National in France. The Front National has also watered down it’s policies a lot. But even they struggle to get more than thirty five percent of the vote. Which means that sixty percent of Frenchmen, and that’s why they keep on losing when they have the run-offs in the presidential elections. That’s why the Le Pens keep on losing the runoffs. They come second and then all the communists, the conservatives, the liberals and the communists all gang together, and all of a sudden they are one party and they vote for the other people. And it’s the same thing over and over again.

So, while I agree with you that there are lots and lots of Europeans alive today. Sadly we’re, what appears to be a majority of them, still don’t know or understand what is going on. Now we can take two approaches. Just one approach we can take is to say:

“Yes well we need to alert them and wake them up, you know, we just need to reach, them tell them the truth and the truth will make them free blah, blah, blah” all that stuff.

Well let’s just say I’ve tried that and I’ve found most people have formed their opinions and facts have very little to do with how they how they reach their opinions. A lot is driven on emotion, a lot of it is driven on personality, a lot of it is driven on on a number of other factors. Basically any other factor except the facts.

So, while we can, whatever we say can be true, unless you can motivate a large number of people, and there’s only been a few periods in history where that’s actually been done. I don’t have to mention which ones they are. A lot of people, most people are motivated not by facts. So, that’s a real problem. Having said that, I’m not pessimistic over the future of the European people or the White race, per se. The reason for that, is that I think, although we have large numbers, ever larger numbers than ever before, I think we’re going to go into a population bottleneck simply because our large numbers have up-bred the stupid class amongst Europeans. That there are now more degenerate stupid, brain-dead Europeans than before.

Lana: Oh, yeah!

Arthur: Again, I think nature is remorseless. Nature isn’t immoral, nature is amoral. Nature doesn’t say this is right or wrong, nature says these are the rules, abide by them or die. And I think those Europeans incapable of understanding the laws of nature will die.

Lana: Yep.

[44:54]

Arthur: And I don’t think we we can do anything about that, but what I do think, is that, as long as we who understand it and can take the necessary steps to secure a geographic area which is homogenous and which can then serve as an attraction point for Europeans who understand what it is all about. Then, even if we are substantially reduced, even if we are reduced by eighty percent, our core will remain solid and anything is possible once all the White liberals vanish, which they will vanish, as well.

Lana: So, is thinking in terms of ethnostates really a luxury here, or a big dream at this point?

Arthur:No, I don’t think so. I think it’s going to come about naturally. I think, White flight is an inadvertent acknowledgment of the reality of that principle. It’s not, people say, “Oh, White flight is just racism”. No, it’s not racism, simply because Whites can’t live in Third World standards. I think that the concept of the enthnostates will come about. And I think it’ll come about sooner than what many people think. I think the developments in Eastern Europe are going to come about within the next couple of decades.

Lana: Now, do you see people moving to a different area, or should they stay where they’re at, if someone’s Swedish and they stay in Sweden and fight for that land?

Arthur:Yeah, that’s a real difficult one. It’s easy for me to say having moved around a lot.

Lana: At the same time you need people to watch your back, right? You need your tribe of people, you know.

Arthur: It’s all good and well to sit and say, “Yes, I’m standing my ground” and you’re in Los Angeles and you’re standing your ground and then the next minute there’s only you and five other Europeans left. You can stand your ground as long as you want to then you can be murdered, for your principles. Or, you can do like what like, what’s happening in South Africa. You, … people can say:

“We’re never leaving the Transvaal, the Orange Free State, that’s the traditional Boer Republic, that is our home!”

Yeah, you can do that, or you can move to Orania, where you actually are not going to be murdered instantly. You might have to defend it eventually. I’m sure you’ll have to defend it eventually, of that there is no doubt. But you can stand and be murdered for your principles, or you can move somewhere else where you can generate the seed of a new revival.

Lana: And it’s going to take hard work. And I think some people don’t want to do that, they don’t want to make the sacrifices and have to start over somewhere else, but that’s what it’s going to take. We’re going to have to be pioneers, once again.

Arthur: Absolutely, absolutely. And if you think it can’t be done, think of your ancestors who did it over and over again. America was created by those people. I mean, the people who arrived in early America, what did they arrive with? They arrived with a few tools, which they had brought across and that was it! They were dumped down on the East Coast and man, that was it. They had to get on with it. They had to move out. They had to build their own houses, they had to build their own wagons, they had to eventually start building their own weapons, that had to do everything from scratch. No, we can do it, it’s easy to do it. Much more difficult to get the will-power to do it.

Lana: Now, how, this is always the question. How do we appeal to the White masses, if the facts and the hard hitting truth isn’t working? I mean what’s it going to take to reach those people? I mean, it seems like they respond to things like entertainment and superficial pop culture, right?

Arthur: You’re asking the wrong person, to answer what appeals to the masses. I have crossed what I mentioned earlier, a psychological Rubicon. When I was younger and I was first involved in this craziness, called the “movement”, I believed, all you have to do is tell people what’s going on. They’ll say:

“Oh yes, of course, I understand who controls the media. I understand! Oh yes, racial demographics, of course! Why didn’t I see this?”

And I saw this in South Africa, you know. You’d explain to people that having a black maid and a black gardener and a cook boy in a White, …

Let me let me tell you about the house which I was raised in Southern Rhodesia. We had a cook boy, black, we had a ironing boy, who would do all the ironing. We had a garden boy and we had a house boy. So we had we had four and their wives and all their piccaninnies [kids]. I mean, when I think about it now, and this is normal for White colonists in Africa, I must tell you. They had virtually an entire tribe living with you.

Lana: Yeah.

[49:43]

Arthur: It was incredible. And it’s still happening today, because they still don’t understand, you know. Everyone talks about the White farmers being murdered in South Africa, and it is a tragedy, don’t get me wrong. It’s terrible, I hate reading about it. But, you know, how many times haven’t, … I spoke at a Transvaal agricultural union meeting in 1991 in Pretoria. And I told him that the die was cast, and the ANC Government was coming and what they needed to do quickly was mechanize, get rid of all the black laborers and get what they needed for security and for land claim purposes. They were going to have trouble, if they’ve got, as they do, even to this day, hundreds of black laborers on their farms, it’s just going to cause trouble with crime. It’s going to cause a problem with land claims, all that type of stuff.

Anyway of course they ignored me. Some of the even booed me:

“Oh no, Philomon been working on my farm for, him and his family, for the last hundred years, you know, even the family they’ll never do anything to us!” blah, blah, blah.

When you’re living on a farm and your outnumbered by your black farm workers, two hundred to one, you’re asking for trouble. Absolutely asking for trouble! So people who fail to understand that demographics controls everything, you can take a horse to water, but you can make it drink. You can lay out all the facts to them and if they don’t, if they refuse to accept it as a reality, there’s nothing more you can do.

And this is where I passed my psychological Rubicon.

I used to believe that if I just explained all of this to everyone, they’ll say:

“Oh, yes of course ha ha. How could we be this stupid. You’re right Arthur! We will quickly support you, we will vote for whatever party you tell us to vote for, and everything will be all right.”

Of course they don’t. Absolutely don’t! And eventually after many, many years, maybe twenty five, thirty years of activism I thought well, it’s either I’m crazy and deluded, or they are. One of the two. I like to think that I’m not, so therefore they are. And then it suddenly struck me. People who are going to die, will die, no matter what you tell them.

I’m I’m reminded of a speech by Hitler, if I’m allowed to mention Hitler?

Lana: Of course.

Arthur: A speech that Hitler gave once, he said:

“Do not imagine that a nation of sixty million cannot die. All it has to do, is decide to die, and it will.”

He was talking about Germany of course. And that’s a very valid thing. If people refuse to, if people decide to ignore racial reality, decide to ignore lessons of history and demographics and race, then they will die. That’s a conscious decision they’re going to take. And so, I have switched my approach completely. I no longer attempt to win with the masses for a great revolution.

My approach now is to recruit as many as I can, to the understanding of what it’s going to take. Consolidate them in a geographic area, stroke, areas, and generate a new resource, a new gene pool for something that can happen in the future.

Lana: That is right, quality not quantity, right? More of a eugenic approach here.

Arthur: That is right. I mean, honestly, sometimes when you look around at Whites around you, do you really, even want to live with them?

Lana: No. No.

Arthur: Well, this is it. A hundred years of maybe, not a hundred, maybe sixty, seventy years of social welfare dependency in Britain has created a huge White underclass! Which God forbid, I would prefer to live in Thailand, rather than live with the British underclass, the White British underclass. And that’s the same everywhere and that’s not knocking, … Everybody, everyone knows what I’m talking about. You get degenerate Whites and I just wouldn’t want to live with them, anymore than anyone else. And now I’m convinced that we can recruit enough White people to restart again somewhere else. The critical thing is the geographic area. I’m not even worried about the numbers, the critical thing is the geographic area. Let me give an example of what, I’m sorry I’m talking so much, …

Lana: No, it’s great. That is why you are here.

Arthur: Let me give you an example of what I’m talking about with numbers, all right. People say:

“Oh, how many people do you need in an ethnostate to make it viable?”

Not, actually, that many. There is a NASA Project called, Hyperion, I think it’s called Hyperion, where they planned, … It’s a theoretical thing because NASA is on it’s last legs. But, it’s a theoretical group of scientists and people planning for interplanetary travel, what it would take to travel inter-planetary.

[55:00]

And with current propulsion systems they say, to get to the nearest solar system, if they should ever send a rocket out there with people needed to colonize a new planet. How many people would they have to send to make a genetically viable planet? You know, to colonize, to set up. But what they’ve done is they’ve calculated, they use geneticists, they’ve calculated that if they are to send a certain number of people to another planet without any additional genetic input from earth, how many people would they have to send to create a genetically viable colony which would not be afflicted by the problems of inbreeding? Okay, have I made myself clear?

Lana: Yeah

Arthur: The answer which came up was quite quite amazing. And it is really, I’m just going to actually put it up here because it’s actually well worth reading. The answer is quite incredible! You would think that you would need millions at least. In actual fact not. They’ve worked it out, a Doctor Cameron Smith, he’s an anthropologist and a prehistorian at State University in Oregon. He compiled the reported in question and I’m right, it’s called Project Hyperion. His report which he compiled and handed in to them, said that the number of people which you would need to create a genetically viable colony on another planet, … You could create it between 14,000 and 40,000 people.

Lana: Huh! Well that’s encouraging.

Arthur: That is! He says, I’m quoting from his report:

“A safe and well considered figure is 40,000 for interstellar migration population. Composed of an effective population of 23, 400 reproductive male and females, the rest being pre or post reproductive individuals. This number would maintain good health over five generations despite (a) increased inbreeding resulting from the relatively small human population, (b) depressed genetic diversity due to the founder effect, (c) demographic change through time and (and) expectation of at least one severe population catastrophe over the five generation voyage.”

So there you go. I mean that’s an extreme example, but the truth is if you think about it logically and you think of the original founding European population, you’ll see that probably the original founding population of all Europeans, all of them, it’s probably not more than a few hundred thousand.

So no, I’m not worried about the grand scheme of things. I think we are going to lose in the coming racial bottleneck, because they simply don’t understand or don’t want to understand what’s happening. I think we’re going to lose huge numbers and we’re going to be compressed geographically. We’re going to lose a lot of territory. But I think we have the advantage now, having an understanding of race history demographics.

If we are reduced down to a few million, we have this understanding we will survive and I’m sure we will create a huge resurgence later on, in a generation or two’s time.

Lana: I suppose to you to want to recruit people who are very technological and maybe work in weaponry, right?

Arthur: That goes by the by. The other angle about ethnostates, is that people say:

“Oh, well the Jewish lobby won’t let you do it!” or, “America will bomb you or whatever.”

The counter argument to that is, of course, is Mexico a world power? That’s my question to you. Just say yes or no.

Lana: No!

Arthur: Right. Why isn’t Mexico a world power?

Lana: Well, because it’s got a Third World population.

Arthur: Because it’s full of Mexicans. Now when America fills up with Mexicans will America be a world power? I can’t imagine Mexicans keeping those B17 [?] bombers going and all the missiles and the, …

Lana: They don’t have a space program in Mexico. So, no.

Arthur: There you go. So you understand that the demographic changes we’re talking about is so immense people don’t grasp the vastness of it. Of what is coming, providing it isn’t reversed. I must add that I’m always, obviously, my first choice is that it’s reversed. If there’s a populist political victory somewhere and then it’s reversed, that’s the first choice, obviously. But I just like to plan for plan B, just in case. But if it goes as it appears to be going, the racial demographic change is going to be so vast that the geo-political order which we know today is going to be turned on it’s head.

[60:08]

Lana: Yes. And if we could use that, actually, to our benefit in the future.

Arthur: Absolutely! There isn’t going to be a great big policeman America, saying:

“Oh no, you can’t have an ethnostate in Eastern Europe” or, “No, you can’t have an ethnostate in Oregon” or, “No, you can’t have an ethnostate where ever”.

Because there ain’t going to be no big American policeman.

Lana: Yeah.

Arthur: There’s going to be a Second, stroke, Third World shambles. And they will be too busy fighting over the scraps, or, who owns the palace, to worry about what a few million Europeans are doing on the other side of the planet or the other side of the continent.

Lana: I think that’s why it’s good what you’re saying, we need to be planning for the future and start building something that people can come to in the future, because it’s inevitable. This is going to fall. We’re watching it fall. So, we shouldn’t be so concerned with all the hows and the who’s, but more of like:

“What are we going to do about it now?” Right?

Arthur:That’s the critical thing. The ethnostate idea and it’s ironic in the extreme. I mean, as you know, the ethnostate idea has been around for a long time. In fact the first ethno-estate theorist was, of course, Theodor Herzl. Zionism is just nothing but a Jewish ethnostate, as you know.

Lana: Yep.

Arthur: And he drew that up in 1896. The next ethnostate project was, of course, National Socialist Germany, and that was destroyed.

And after that it’s basically been put on the back burner, or Japan is probably a good example of a functioning ethnostate. They are coming under increasing pressure. China is, Pakistan is, India is. They’ve all got laws which encourage Indian, Pakistani, Chinese, Japanese immigration only. So, therefore they could be, in the broader sense of the word, that could be called ethnostates.

But apart from that, apart from Israel, the only other near ethnostate project to date, has been the Orania people in South Africa and the Pioneer Little Europe which emerged in the 1990s, I think.

[Image] Orania is an Afrikaner-only South African town located along the Orange River in the arid Karoo region of Northern Cape province. The town is split in two halves by the R369 road, and lies halfway between Cape Town and Pretoria.

[Image] Orania lies halfway between Cape Town (bottom left) and Pretoria (top right).

All that I’ve been trying to do with with my Nova Europa book and my little website and that, is just to try to popularize the idea and give it some practical impetus, that is all. But yes, no, we do need to be planning for that.

Having said all of that, one must never abandon completely the possibility that Europeans will wake up. If Europeans wake up, they can reverse everything overnight, literally. Europeans are so powerful they just have to think that they can survive and they will. Just to invert what Hitler said earlier. And I’m not yet completely convinced that Austria isn’t going to be the first country in Europe to rebel, formally. I mean Hungary already has. Hungary’s a great country. If you ever want to go and visit that country, it’s a great place to visit. Poland’s great. That Czech Republic’s great. Slovakia’s great. Those are all nations which have already, European Russia, Byelorussia, those places.

Those are all nations that are already seen and understood what’s going on. And they are already nations with firmly established infrastructures and I’m not convinced that there won’t come a revival from that point of view. In this regard you can watch what happens at the May 22nd Austrian presidential run-off where the FPO [Freedom Party of Austria] stands a good chance of taking the presidency of Austria. And that might spark off an FPO Government, which the rest of Europe is going to go mad. The rest of liberal Europe’s going to get mad again. And who knows where that can lead? But, just in case that doesn’t happen we should have a plan B.

Lana: And simultaneously have our people, have our people getting into politics! I say this all the time, where’s our people, where’s our party, where is our watch groups, we shouldn’t abandon that either, right?

Arthur:Absolutely! I do think that was a great mistake of the post 1970s, 1980s and 1990s so-called movement in America of retreating and waiting for the establishment to fall, in the great Turner Diaries White liberation army would rise up and seize power. Of course it’s just fantasy. I think that people should have been out there campaigning as hard as they could. Even if you didn’t win you would have just racially conscientized* so many more people.

[* To conscientize somebody/yourself (South African English) is to make somebody/yourself aware of important social or political issues.

Example: People need to be conscientized about their rights.]

[65:03]

You know, Donald Trump’s the case in point. He hasn’t set out to racially conscientize anything. I think, if anything is run an incredibly multiracial campaign. But just saying one or two half sensible things has conscientized millions of people. And that shows what can be done under the right circumstances.

Lana: Meanwhile in London, your first Muslim mayor, right? How’s that going?

Arthur: Well, that’s only a shock for those who don’t, who haven’t been following the immigration invasion into Europe. People don’t know, Birmingham had a Muslim mayor before. Birmingham’s the second largest city. There is a black mayor of Bristol, the town of Bristol. That’s old hat. I mean Whites are an absolute minority in London. Whites are an absolute minority in Birmingham. They’re close to minority in Manchester, and those are your three biggest cities in Britain.

Lana: And people are celebrating becoming a minority over there, right? Meanwhile all the nonWhites know that demographics matter most. They know that’s what it takes to win!

Arthur: Well, there’s an intrinsic understanding to that. Just getting back to what I was saying earlier about people worried about what the Jewish lobby will say about a European ethnostate. The Jewish lobby is only powerful as long as Europeans are in charge. For some peculiar reason, there has to be a reason for it, not having had the time or the interest to fathom it, but when countries swing majority nonWhite, the Jewish Lobby loses it’s power.

So that, it’s a very self-defeating thing for the Jewish lobby to encourage nonWhite immigration because they will end up losing. Can you imagine, for example, a Vicente Fox [a Mexican businessman who was President of Mexico from 2000 to 2006] controlled US government in Washington DC, continuing to pump four billion dollars a year into Israel?

Lana: No.

Arthur: When they’ve got hundreds of millions of Hispanics on their food stamps. It’s not going to happen. Israel’s funding is going to dry up. The day that America collapses is the day Israel’s funding dries up.

Lana: That’s right. It’s generally only White people that care about Israel.

Arthur: Correct! In fact, I would go even further and say the nonWhite world is probably inherently hostile to Israel because of the way Israel has treated the Palestinians. So, it’s a very self-defeating thing and that also, … I think one once that happens, once as a swing of that nature happens, it’s also going to take the teeth out of the Jewish lobbies ability to effect anything else, anywhere, as well.

Lana: And I know we’re getting ready to close here, but I wanted to ask you about one more thing. You write about the third great race war which is, you know, the Moors invading Europe. How is it that Europeans have forgotten that we fought off Arabs before?

Arthur: It’s a good question. I think ultimately the outcome of the Second World War has to be the biggest deciding factor in that. I think, prior to the Second World War and all the propaganda that has followed it, I think most Europeans were, had an understanding of race and racial world issues. I think America led the world before World War Two in terms of eugenic research. And certainly far more developed than what anything the Germans had. And I think the advent of the Second World War and the propaganda fallout from that war has caused the science of race to be completely suppressed. And anyone who even raises the topic on the subject, has been subjected to endless smears and attacks.

And the at the same time the communists reds have had their long march through the institutions [the Frankfurt School with its Critical Theory and cultural Marxism]. And with the result people don’t know anything about race, anymore. I think that’s the real reason.

They actually believe that importing the Middle East into Europe is going to make them Europeans in a few years, instead of importing the chaos of the Middle East into Europe, that’s what they actually appear to believe. And as I said, I can only ascribe it to the outcome and the propaganda following the end of the Second World War.

Lana: It just blows my mind. I mean European women in Europe had been raped by non White invading hordes for a long time now. And now we’re inviting back in some of the same bloodlines. Its pretty outrageous, and they’re doing the same thing, right?

Arthur: Someone said to me just today, he made the exact point which you are making now, is that the only people who are prepared to change, appear be the Europeans. Everyone else is acting true to form. Which is really a sad thing to think about. But! As I said to you, if that’s what they’re going to believe in, and when all the facts are staring them in the face, well then that’s what they’re going to believe.

What we have to do, we have to step up our recruiting efforts and recruit as many people, awaken as many people as possible. To those who are receptive to the idea and make them understand that great sacrifices are coming, but if they make the sacrifices our future is assured.

[70:20]

Lana: What always drives me nuts too, when I hear European people say:

“Well, we need to race mix, you know, it’s survival. It’s about adapting to change, so we need to blend in.”

Have you heard that?

Arthur: I’ve heard that and much worse. [laughing] I’ve heard people say:

“Yeah, well there’s nothing you can do about it”.

The one thing, and this might tread on listeners’ toes, and if it does, it’s a case of, “Veritas odium parit”, “truth purchases hatred”. One thing that I have noticed, is that the so-called White nationalist activists tend to be those with the fewest children.

Lana: Yep, that’s true.

Arthur: And I think that’s a serious issue which unless all these activists who run around saying:

“Fourteen words and preserve a future for our children!”

Unless they themselves start living this out, everything becomes pointless without children.

Lana: That’s true. That is absolutely right!

Well Arthur, I really appreciated your time today. I’m honored to have you here. Please tell everyone how they can buy your books. They really need to help support you. I actually bought your complete volume of March Of The Titans last night, so I could have it digitally, loving it. It’s great to go back to and I think people should share it with their friends and family and children. But, tell people how they can get your work.

Arthur: Well OK, you can get March of the Titans on Amazon, of course. A great miracle of modern marketing, that website is. Or you can get a good spread of everything else that I do on ostarapublications.com. That is Ostara as in the goddess of the spring, Ostara Publications dot com. Ostarapublications.com, ostarapublications, one word, and you basically get everything that you need to know there.

Lana: So does that mean you enjoy a lot of the Nordic pre-Christian traditions?

Arthur: Yeah, well, Ostara I chose because it symbolizes rebirth, you know. Easter, the celebration of Easter as we have it today is taken from Ostara. And the goddess Ostara was the goddess of spring, of new life, that’s where, that’s why she had the egg and the rabbit as her symbols, because the egg is the symbol of fertility and there are few animals more fertile and more reproductive than the rabbit. And that’s where the Easter Bunny comes from. And that’s where the Easter egg comes from. So, I thought, well I’m going to pick something with symbolizes what I feel, then it’s going to be about revival, rebirth of new life.

[Image] The Goddess of Ostara (or Eostre in old English) with symbols of fertility and new life.

Lana: Very nice. Well thank you so much for your time this evening. I really appreciate it.

Arthur: Lana, thanks so much for having me.

[72:55]

END

_________________________

======================================

Click to download a PDF of this post (3.0 MB). Please download and spread around:

Red Ice – Arthur Kemp — TRANSCRIPT

_____________________

Version History

Version 4: Jun 1, 2020 — Re-uploaded images and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version.

Version 3: Dec 29, 2016 — Formatting improvements.

Version 2: Jun 2, 2016 — Added PDF of post.

Version 1: May 29, 2016 — Created post.

Evolution and Behavior – katana17

Sven Longshanks – Albion Insights – Speech Crime – AI 031923 – May 16, 2023 – Transcript

Sven Longshanks

Albion Insights

Speech Crime

Tue, May 16, 2023

https://www.radioalbion.com/2023/05/albion-insights-speech-crime-ai-031923.html

Description

TRANSCRIPT QUALITY = 4.5 Stars

TRANSCRIPT

CONTENTS

Sven Longshanks Sentenced to Two and a Half Years in Prison

It’s Multiculturalism That’s Being Criticised

What Led up to Me Being Taken to Court

System Resistance Network 2017

“Their propaganda was very likely illegal and it made him blush, or even made him blush.”

“Anybody that has anything to do with this group is either getting involved with idiots that vandalise things, or is getting involved in a group which has been set up by the State.”

Allegation That Hope Not Hate Made

“Well, if there’s any crime that’s been carried out, we assure you there will be charges brought against them for this crime.”

BBC Makes a Program

MP from Cardiff Calls for Radio Aryan to Be Investigated

“Look, this is a false allegation that’s been made. You’re welcome to check out the podcast.”

“Well, they’re likely to say, ‘Well, who are you?’”.

“Well, I’m Sven Longshanks.”

“Well, anybody could be Sven Longshanks could say that.”

“Well, we’ve never heard of you.”

“Well, we’re not inciting any hate, we’re not doing anything wrong here.”

Two Years Later, My Door Got Knocked Down by Police in December 2019

Changed the Name of Radio Aryan to Radio Albion

Police Raid by 15 Officers and Equipment Taken

Questioned by Police

“We need to question you about this.”

“Well, I’ve done nothing wrong, and I know that my beliefs are not illegal.”

“Well, it’s a creed, and you are supposed to be protected if you have a creed.”

“Well, that’s a book from, I think, the late 1800s, early 1900s.”

“It’s all about statistics, it’s all accurate.”

Audio Books – The Painted Savages of England, The International Jew

“You’ve accounted for yourself very well.”

“And if everything that you say checks out, then you don’t have the charges against you.”

“Right, well, sweet then!”

“How awful it was, how terrible it was.”

“Well, they’re bound to just drop the charges, aren’t they?”

Mark Collett Gets Sven New Equipment

“Mark, can you order me a new computer, order me a new microphone, the police have taken everything, I’ll pay you back for it, but I need to get back online again as quickly as possible.”

“Oh, we had technical problems yesterday.”

In 2021 Police Serve Sven with 15 New Charges

“Oh, we’ve got to serve you with these charges.”

“Will you investigate this organisation please, or whatever it is.

“No, we won’t charge him for that. We’ll charge him for 15 completely different podcasts that we haven’t mentioned at all in the three hour interview.”

“Well, we’ll let the police have a go.”

“Well, he was able to answer the police. Let’s see if he can answer a barrister these questions?”

Going to Court in 2023

“Oh, he’s doing this because he wants to encourage people to hate non-Whites and to resent non-Whites!”

Why Waste Energy on Hating Non-Whites?

“You can’t really hold these people to blame for that.”

“Well, you’ve got one people group here that has a lower average intelligence and higher rate of incarceration.”

“Well, perhaps you should be a little bit more lenient on them. The fact is that they carry out more crime because they’ve got a lower IQ and they can’t change that. That’s the way they are.”

Our System was Built for Whites, Not Non-Whites with Low IQ

“The White man’s legal system penalises us, it’s racist. More of us end up in prison. It doesn’t work for us!”

“Well, it’s racist against me!”

“Well, I’m doing this for all the younger versions of me that never saw themselves represented on the screen, never had somebody to look up to, never had somebody to show them that it is possible to get to these positions.”

Tension Created When You Have Multiculturalism

“This system is racist!”

You Can’t Change Blacks, Muslims or Jews

“Well, Muslims really don’t like to see images.”

“Well, this is really offensive. It’s so offensive to me that you’ve got this picture of Muhammad there, that some of us may even think that that requires a death penalty. It’s that serious!”

“Yes, jews are thriving!”

Other Groups are Thriving but Not Whites

The Law Against Incitement to Hate – Legislating Against an Emotion

“Oh no! You can’t feel hate!”

You’ll Only Be Listening to This If It All Goes Wrong!

END

Comments

See Also

PDF Download

Version History

Actual Justice Warrior – BLM Riots Destroyed Minneapolis Forever – May 5, 2023 – Transcript

Actual Justice Warrior

BLM Riots Destroyed

Minneapolis Forever