Joel Davis: It is the 7th of November 2024. Thomas Sewell will be with us shortly. But we already have obviously Jacob Hersant here next to me and Blair Cottrell. It’s been a big few days and we did a stream on Monday earlier this week because we missed the stream last week because of some Halloween antics. And those Halloween antics have become, I guess now notorious, apparently illegal in the state of Victoria to have fun. So we’ll be talking about that tonight.

 

But also Donald Trump White Power. He did it. The libtards in meltdown. I saw a statistic that there’s been over 2,000 suicides in the United States overnight. So W Trump, L Trannies, L Libtards. Yeah, it’s been kind of humourous to witness the meltdown. But yeah, so we’ll discuss that, but later in the show I guess we’ll discuss the American election.

 

But first and foremost we’ve got news of our own, because today four of our comrades, including Jacob and Tom, two other individuals, Will and Nathan, woke up to being raided by the police, and no one was charged except Tom.

 

So the reason why Tom was raided, according to the police, was basically over the, there was an intent to charge Tom, allegedly. But they stated, but they didn’t follow through today over the Yellow Grubs rally, so to speak. The rally we did at the front of the Chinese consulate a few weeks ago where we burnt Chinese flags, effigies of Mao, effigies of Xi, and also an effigy of the baby mutilator himself. And then Tom gave a speech and this is being construed somehow as “racial vilification” and so forth, apparently, because calling the Chinese Communist Party, calling the Chinese government “yellow grubs” apparently is really offensive. So they came to Tom’s house and arrested him this morning for this. But they couldn’t arrest the actual baby mutilator himself!

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you want to make sure the audience is aware of what the baby mutilator did? Like this was a, I think a Chinese guy who wanted an Australian citizenship, was in the process.

 

Joel Davis: His permanent Visa application was denied and then he got upset about that and decided to throw scolding hot coffee on a nine month old White baby in a racial hate crime before jumping on a plane and flying back to China. And the police did not capture him or arrest him because they refused to put out a description, or a picture of him, because they didn’t want to stoke “racial tension”, quote, unquote, in the community.

 

So basically he was allowed to get away from justice because we can’t allow White people to become racist!

 

But then at the same time it’s really racist that we refer to the Chinese Communist Party as “yellow grubs” for not handing over this baby mutilator to face justice in Australia despite such an egregious act that he committed.

 

So anyway, that happened. They also charged Tom with the so-called crime of “intimidating a police officer”.

 

Now, apparently this was actually because of remarks he made on this very show a few weeks ago where we were discussing the second Fuck Off! We’re Full! Rally that we, now, I think about three weeks ago or so now, and where we got pepper sprayed and so on. We discussed it on the show. And Tom was discussing the undercover police officer who was employed, the plainclothes police officer who pulled down the mask of one of our guys during the rally, which is technically a form of assault. And so efforts were made to identify who that individual police officer was because he assaulted someone.

 

And Tom said on the stream where it’s the effect of:

 

“Well, we’re not going to release his identity now because we’re not sure exactly, you know how that would be construed, maybe that would be construed as illegal, as intimidating a police officer. So we’ll look into the law and then we’ll figure out what the right course of action is.”

 

Hasn’t done anything since. Apparently that’s grounds to charge him for breaking that law, which is crazy! Because his statements literally state the opposite, that he was going to abide by that law and take care to abide by that law and didn’t reveal his identity to the public on that basis. So it’s totally, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Hang on, has he actually been charged in relation to that commentary specifically?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the comments he made on this very show.

 

Blair Cottrell: And what’s the wording of the charge?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, intimidating a police officer.

 

Blair Cottrell: So by stating that he didn’t want to reveal this police officer’s identity because he was concerned about the legality of doing that, he’s been charged for saying that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, he was going to try and figure out how to reveal his identity in a legal way. He said he would see if there was a way to do it because this individual committed assault against one of our guys. He was peacefully demonstrating with us.

 

And so we want this police officer to face some kind of justice. He committed a crime! Not that we want, we’re not threatening violence against him that we will execute, but that he needs to face some kind of like legal justice. Right? It’s in the public interest for police officers who assault private citizens peacefully, politically demonstrating, probably to be named and shamed in some way. But he was going to look into the law and figure out how to go about it without breaking the law, then hasn’t done anything since. Apparently that’s grounds to raid his house, handcuff him and charge him with this nonsense crime.

 

So I think basically what this is, … And obviously Tom will be on soon to give his take and Jacob will give his take, but my interpretation of what this is we did a series of very successful rallies in short succession that got a very positive response from the wider Australian community, but also drew widespread condemnation from the political elite.

 

And so there was a lot of political pressure on the police to do something to show that they’re “standing up to the Nazis” or whatever. And so they’ve just basically tried to slap a bunch of bullshit charges on our guys in order to, basically say:

 

“Hey, look, you know, we’re going after the Nazis, we’re shutting them down.”

 

And so on. But I didn’t expect any of these charges to really hold up in the courts. I think most of them will end up being dropped before they even get before a judge.

 

[06:46]

 

Blair Cottrell: Didn’t you say, only Tom is being charged?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, only Tom has been charged at this stage. They indicated they intend to charge the others, but they didn’t lay any charges today. They’re just investigating at the moment, apparently.

 

So anyway, Jacob can articulate, I guess, his experience. I don’t want to speak on his behalf with him sitting right here. What happened to you this morning?

 

Jacob Hersant: Well, I woke up really early this morning. I was feeling sick. I woke up at like 5 and I had a really sore throat and a bad headache.

 

So I went and drank some water and had had some, what do you call it, Nurofen. And then I went back to sleep and it was a good sleep and I felt like I woke up and I felt so much better.

 

But as I woke up, [chuckling] there was two police officers in my room! Two! One was, I think they were Counter-Terrorism. I don’t know. Not all of them were.

 

Blair Cottrell: How did they get into your room? Did someone let them in?

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, well, they just barged through the door. I believe my father let him let him in because I was staying with my parents because they live close to Melbourne, the Magistrates Court. So they’re a lot closer in the city than I normally am. So I’m staying there to obviously go to court tomorrow.

 

So I was just preparing for court, really. Like, I expected to just spend today just relaxing so that I could go to court. But obviously the police had different ideas.

 

Blair Cottrell: So what did they say to you when they, like, you woke up and they were just standing looking at you in your room?

 

Jacob Hersant: Oh, they’re just like:

 

“We got a search warrant.”

 

And then they just handcuffed me and then took a bunch of my electronics, took my phone, took my computer. It just took a whole bunch of electronics because that’s what they do every single time.

 

Blair Cottrell: And they still have that stuff now?

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah. Oh, they’ll have it forever. That’s what they do. Not forever, but, like, they’ll have it for however long this takes, which could be a year or two years or however long.

 

So it will be a while. That’s what they count on. Like, part of it is obviously just harassment. Stealing our equipment, holding onto it as long as they can so that we can’t operate with it. It’s kind of annoying that they took my phone because I only just got it repaired the day before. I was having problems, and I went and paid to get it fixed, and then, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that sucks! It’s also if they have it for extended periods of time, so I’m pretty sure if the batteries aren’t charged for ages, it can kind of cook them a little bit. And they’re basically shot anyway, so you have to rebuy all that stuff.

 

So hopefully they don’t have it for too long.

 

Jacob Hersant: And they’re unsecure, obviously. They put all kinds of spyware on it every time. Yeah, it’s really annoying.

 

But, yeah, they raid me and then they handcuffed me and they take me to Melbourne West police station. They drive me there. Then they give me an interview in relation to Halloween. So they ask a bunch of questions about a Ku Klux Klan robe. And their charges were the that they allege “grossly offensive behaviour or grossly offensive conduct”, which has a maximum of five years, and it’s an indictable offence, which is crazy to me. Yeah, pretty crazy! What people conceive to be offensive can get you jailed for five years in Victoria. And then “serious vilification”. I don’t know what constitutes serious vilification as opposed to regular racial vilification.

 

And then the other one was “swearing in public”, like acting offensively and Swearing in public.

 

And then there was a fourth one I’m struggling to recall right now. What was it?

 

Blair Cottrell: But they didn’t actually lay any of these charges on you. They just notified you of their intent to do so, is that right?

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, and they made it pretty clear that they’re gonna do it.

 

Joel Davis: So just for the benefit of the audience, this is on the basis of if you saw the Hersant Klansman content over Halloween. This is in relation to, I guess, the Halloween antics. That’s also what Nathan Bull is charged in relationship because he was in blackface. But they allege all of this nonsense!

 

Like, they allege that they have these two black women who. I didn’t even see some of that. One of the other boys saw them, apparently. But they were apparently sitting in their car filming us while we’re in a Bunnings car park. Because we were going into Bunnings to get some supplies to make a Klan torch, a little homemade tiki torch kind of thing.

 

But anyway, the apparently they allege that we racially abused them and we’re throwing Romans profusely and all this. But I didn’t like that never happened! Like, literally there was just like these two black chicks sitting in a car far away with their phone out filming us inside their car.

 

[12:12]

 

Jacob Hersant: We didn’t interact with them at all!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So it’s total bullshit! It’s total bullshit!

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah. Yeah, they claim that we were like, throwing Roman salutes and stuff, like, constantly. And they tried to imply that if you’ve seen that Hersant short of the Klan, that this gesture, like this [palm face up] with the left hand going like, White Power. They were trying to say that was a Nazi gesture.

 

So I guess that’s a Nazi salute. Doing this:

 

“White Power!”

 

So, yeah, they took a still [picture] of that and they were trying to say, … And whoever these witnesses that were lying about us, they were saying basically we were throwing like 20 to 30 Romans yelling “White Power!” at like two black women in a Bunnings car park!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Jacob Hersant: And the CCTV, they didn’t show any pictures or anything like that. Like, it’s pretty easy to see if someone’s throwing a Roman from CCTV footage. It’s pretty distinctive.

 

Blair Cottrell: How long did they hold you for in the interview room?

 

Jacob Hersant: Probably took three to four hours or five hours in total.

 

But, yeah, I was in the cell for a little bit and then I was in the interview room. The interview went for 50 minutes, I think. And yeah, they were just talking about the Klan robe and everything. And just these witness statements. And they’re like reading out the transcript of the video so that, like, you had a police informant, like, saying to me:

 

“Happy Halloween!”

 

And [chuckling] then read out the whole script. So yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: What was your intention in making that video?

 

Jacob Hersant: It was just satire. It was just fun on Halloween. Like, it’s pretty obvious what it was.

 

Blair Cottrell: So you guys were just like dressing up, making costumes and having a good time, basically?

 

Joel Davis: Well, as every parochial Aussie knows, Halloween apparently is an American holiday. And you know, what’s more American than apple pie and baseball? We thought, you know, Klu Klux Klan and dressing up in blackface. Like, what’s more American than that? I mean, that’s quintessential Americana, if anything is, right?

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, but Tom’s here now. We should hear what Tom’s experience was.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: If you can hear us, Tom, and you’re ready to go. What happened this morning, mate?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I can hear you. And I’m assuming I’m unmuted. I’m on the backup laptop because they got two of the laptops. Fucking arseholes!

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, this one still seems like it’s pretty good quality.

 

Thomas Sewell: So I have the same webcam. They didn’t take the webcam. They came just to take our electronics. And my NSN uniform. My LARP uniform.

 

Yeah, I’m just reading through. I’ve got two intervention orders put on me. One for a police officer who I’ve never mentioned before on stream, and the other for his wife. Again, I haven’t mentioned them on stream, but I probably shouldn’t say their names. It doesn’t say specifically in the intervention order. It’s just as a brief description.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why the police officer’s wife? Has the wife ever been discussed before, like, even privately?

 

Thomas Sewell: No, no, not at all! The last show that we did. Not the last show, I think the show before we had the Fuck Off We’re Full rally number two. And at that rally there was a cop that was taking masks off the boys, trying to identify them, like illegally. He was assaulting the guys.

 

Now, obviously we’ve put in complaints in the past about police. We haven’t put in complaints about this police officer specifically, but maybe we will follow it up and see if there’s any chance. But there is basically no chance that the Corruption Commission will actually address our members being assaulted.

 

And I’m not talking about the pepper spray earlier. The police are saying that they used “justified force as a tactical response because of the ever encroaching risk to human safety”. You know, like they covered the Fuck Off We’re Full rally with a bit of lingoistic jargon. But about 20 minutes later when we’re around the corner on the other side, there was no risk to safety. We were at like an appropriate distance. We were an opposing rally with an opposing view. And this detective from the city, who shall not be named on the Internet at this stage, walked in to our ranks and just started grabbing people by their face.

 

And one of the young guys, I think he’s maybe only 18 and he’s injured actually at the moment, I’m surprised that he came to the rally because he actually twisted his knee. But the cops came in and this cop came in and just grabbed him by the face trying to take the mask off. And he did it twice. And there’s video footage of this is obviously an assault. There’s no law that says that you can’t wear a face covering while protesting unless it’s a designated place. And that was not a designated place. He was lawfully, we were all lawfully allowed to wear masks at that rally. And this cop has gone above and beyond the law to a point of “I have the gun so I can do what I want” and assaulted one of our members.

 

And what I mentioned on stream was that this person. I’m only repeating, I’m only going to repeat what I said on stream already, because it’s already on stream. It’s already there. It’s going to go to court. There’s no point arguing any of that nonsense!

 

But you know, I’m sure someone can clip it can edit from that Fuck Off We’re Full rally maybe 60 seconds or so, maybe not even 60 seconds. But I merely mentioned that this person felt the need to expose the identities of our members and perhaps we should expose his identity. I mean that’s fair, isn’t it? If they feel the need to pull off our masks at a demonstration, perhaps the public should know who these people are, who these police officers are? And because I said that on stream and I think word for word on the stream, I may have used the term, I mentioned the law. There is a law about intimidating a police officer. It’s like section, it’s in the charge report because they actually quote me in the charge saying that I talked about this on stream, where I basically said that, I said on the stream that doxing is still legal. The law hasn’t passed yet. We can’t dox someone, but there is a law about intimidating a police officer.

 

And so we have to be very careful. We can’t do it in a way that could be seen threatening or intimidation. And I think I said something like maybe we could do it comically or I don’t know, I have to go back to the drawing board.

 

And then we moved on and we didn’t talk about it any further. They’re using that segment of the stream to say that I have threatened violence to a police officer and his wife.

 

[19:23]

 

Blair Cottrell: Just to clarify, that’s the only commentary that they’re actually relying on as the basis for the charge. There’s nothing else. Not anything private, like that’s it.

 

Thomas Sewell: That is their entire evidence. Their entire evidence is that we downloaded his social media.

 

Blair Cottrell: What does that mean, downloaded his social media? What does that entail?

 

Thomas Sewell: We said on stream that this person wants to dox us. Well, we’ll dox, … You know, he wants to reveal our identity. Well, maybe we should reveal his identity. Not that we’re going to, but maybe we should. Maybe we should consider it. Not for the purpose of harm and intimidation, but merely for the purposes of public shame, which is what they’re trying to do to us. And it made me really think that we don’t use doxing or public shaming really, as, we don’t use it as like a weapon. We don’t use it as a threat of violence or intimidation.

 

The only time we’ve ever doxed anyone, we’ve done it in a way. There’s been, I think, two or three people that have been doxxed from our own camp like that that I’ve ordered the doxing of and they are people that have just fundamentally betrayed us. They are people that have gone above and beyond to hurt the movement from the inside. And they’re of poor character and of disrepute. And they should be publicly shamed, or not necessarily publicly shamed, but people should be aware of these people so that they don’t deal with them, so they don’t have dealings with them.

 

And in the past, I’ve had police come to my house and threaten me and lie to me and pretend to arrest me, but not actually arrest me. And in those circumstances, I mention them by name as well on the Internet. I said, these are the people that came to my house and they did this. And likewise today the police that came to my house was an Officer Pecker, an Officer Wright, and an Officer Christensen.

 

Okay, so this is lawful language. I can say that. I can say these are the police officers that came to my house and in an attempt to intimidate myself and my family. I can say that that’s not actually illegal.

 

So the police are so sensitive. The police themselves are so full of hatred and violence towards us, violence that they’ve used against us. That merely mirroring in any way, in the most vaguest way possible, like saying:

 

“Maybe we should publicly shame this person or maybe we should document this person?”

 

That is construed as an act of intimidation, threatening and violence. And they’ve actually written, … I can read out here. I think I can read this out. It’s just the intervention order, so it’ll be read out in court anyway.

 

But basically what it says is that, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I think as long as you redact the names of the people on the order, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m not going to say their name, because I don’t think I’m allowed to.

 

But, yeah, basically saying:

 

“On October 24, a video on Twitter, the leader of the National Socialist Network, Thomas Sewell, talking about him as the police officer who took their mask off during the protests. Sewell states they have positively identified who Blank is, and they are aware of his family members and recent events, such as getting married. Sewell also mentioned that he’d seen a photo of his house. Da da da, … This is an old house. They’ve since moved. And since now, they’ve gotten rid of their social media. The way Sewell is talking is very consistent with the posts that they have made. And Sewell also stated he is reading the Crimes Act and exploring avenues on how to dox (insert person’s name).”

 

Yeah, the police are trying to allege that’s a crime. That I’ve read the Crimes Act and I’ve gone:

 

“Can we legally publicly shame this person for what they’ve done?”

 

And when I think about that, it’s interesting. The media and police have doxed so many of our guys in the hopes to bring harm to them, physical harm to them. Tim has been firebombed because of the way that the media have doxed him.

 

[23:47]

 

So the media are responsible for terrorism against him! The police didn’t even investigate the terrorism against him!

 

Furthermore, when the media do this and when the government does this, like when Channel Nine infiltrated our organisation along with ASIO, along with a subcontractor and the police, the Counter Terrorism police, when they did this, they filmed inside our homes. They filmed Jacob’s missus in the kitchen. They went into our homes and filmed our wives in our homes!

 

Furthermore, they organised us to be attacked during this whole process.

 

Furthermore, they had about 20 guys, they publicly shamed us across the newspaper. Not that any of us really care about that public shaming. I would say almost all of us now, maybe not back then, but all of us now are completely open with all our friends and family. That’s why it’s so important to be open with your friends and family, so when you get doxed one day, no one’s surprised. But they plastered about 20 men’s names and faces across the newspaper. If you remember this. I still remember this newspaper. I still remember reading it when I got out of prison, because I couldn’t read it when I was in prison.

 

But when I got out I remember reading it and it had 20 men’s names and faces on it. Every single one of those men had their bank account shut down. Every single one of those men is still harassed by the police to this day. Every time they board an international flight or really anything of any opportunity to be harassed.

 

So the police are projecting their terrorism, their terroristic intent onto us! We haven’t terrorized anyone. We haven’t attacked anyone’s home. We haven’t. We don’t go to people’s homes, barge on the door and rock up with guns and search warrants. We don’t do this. The police do that when they find out who we are! Hence we protect our identity.

 

So it’s a very, very interesting situation and I’m very happy to go to court over it. I’m very happy to put my case forward to a judge. I don’t even think I’m going to get a lawyer for this one, to be honest. I know that it does carry a pretty serious sentence, but the police have a habit of overexerting their power. And then when it does get to court, they realise:

 

“How can we back this up?”

 

There’s been no threat made. And this is the same nonsense which kept me locked up in solitary confinement for 210 days. The reason why I had my bail removed was they said the police lied in the court and said I was threatening witnesses. And the sheer notion of threatening witnesses gets your fucking bail taken off you, basically!

 

And so I was in solitary confinement for 14 days, and then I should have been released when it went to the higher court. But the police lied in court and said that I was threatening witnesses. What were the threats that the police allege? The police alleged that I used a prison phone to organise my men outside of prison to threaten witnesses. But that never happened. That’s not true. When it got to a higher court, I tried to get the audio from the police [word unclear]. I’d been in prison for 210 days. And I was trying to get my lawyer to ask the judge, can we play the prison phone call? Police are saying they’ve got a copy of the prison phone call that it’s recorded. Let’s play the phone call to a judge so the judge can hear it. Before my lawyer can even get the prison phone call played in court, in open court, not these closed secret kangaroo courts, but in open court:

 

“Let’s hear the phone call. What did Mr. Sewell actually say?”

 

Before my lawyer could do that, the police dropped their accusation.

 

So I had already served 210 days. And the police dropped their accusation. And the judge said:

 

“Well, what the fuck is he doing in here?”

 

And released me. Well, he didn’t say “what the fuck?” but he said, like:

 

“What is this man still doing in prison for?”

 

And he released me on the spot!

 

So what the accusation the police made, the lie that they made, was they said:

 

“I was getting men, I was rounding up men on the outside to go attack these people.”

 

What the prison phone call actually was was we had worked out the connection between the people that attacked us at Cathedral Ranges, that they were friends on Facebook with people in Antifa, close friends on Facebook with people within Antifa, that had attacked us in the past. And we were making the connection that people that put screws in our tyres and people that attacked our cars were the same group of people that were down at the at the Cathedral Ranges car park, that just happened to be on a holiday.

 

And I said to the boys over the phone, I said:

 

“Okay, screenshot everything and send it through to my lawyer, send it through to the defense, send it through to Kieran Reynolds. Screenshot everything. All the Facebook likes, all the Facebook friends. Screenshot it all and send it through. Document it! Document who these people are. Document their alliances, their friendships, their business associates, their whatever it is. Document what you can and send it through so we can make a case.”

 

And the police were so threatened by that:

 

“That we dare build a defense for ourselves!”

 

So this is something that we’re very used to. It’s very frustrating, but it’s just a fight. We’ve got a fight on our hands. Absolutely!

 

[28:53]

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

[3:00:32]

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 11/13/2024 = 332)

HyperChat min: 100

@SpyroTheFascistDragon
5 days ago
Donald Trump is only loyal to jews and money. he is the most transactional president since Lyndon B Johnson

25
0
Hide replies
Hit the mark
3 days ago(edited)
ALL politicians are controlled on all sides…….WW2 was a defeat…….our governments are not our own but are ruses…WW2 was a victory only for the NWO aka JWO…..we must stand together and in time these hostile agents to our people must be removed from power….

1
0
warren-g
5 days ago
that bullshit about blacks or poc’s being better fighters than whites is crap…they like fighting more, thats all

11
0
Hide replies
MrWebster
5 days ago
We should learn to fight and love being savage More than their Monkey Nigger brains can even comprehend!!!

5
0
Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
read the culture of critique by Kevin macdonald

7
0
Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
the merchants found a well to poison…

6
0
Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
antifa is a Jewish militia

6
0
warren-g
5 days ago
trump is going to fail do anything for a second time

6
1

@SpyroTheFascistDragon
5 days ago
Pat Buchanan chose a black female running mate when he ran lol

4
0
Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
lactose intolerance is common among people of Jewish descent. Studies have found that between 60-80% of Ashkenazi Jews are lactose intolerant, and one study of Jewish adults in Western Canada found that 68.8% were lactose intolerant

4
0
Hide replies

@e2
5 days ago
Any none aryan, not just jews

1
0
Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
the only intolerance we dont tolerate is lactose intolerance!

3
0
Mark Collett
5 days ago
Morning guys!

3
0
Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
Americans complain about democracy. Yet they have millions of weapons. The constitution legally says (its not me who says) they are allowed to overthrow a government if it is tyrannical. “Any form of government becomes destructive. It is the right to abolish it and overthrow it” – BF

2
0
Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@warren-g
How can it be failing if your plan is to intentionally fail?

2
0

@kiro_darkpaw
14 hours ago
You would think with all of these false arrests, unlawful imprisonments, assaults, etc.. that you guys would have been able to sue for millions by now and not have to worry about finances anymore.

1
0
My Awesome Channel
4 days ago
2000 mostly whity suicides is great for you.
get off my stream u grub

0
1
Whitefreedom
4 days ago
cannot say….white power with Trump. he isnt European….hes a filthy askanazi jew, who’s loyalty is to jiz-rael.

1
0
ThinRedLine
5 days ago
good show o/

1
2
Walther Mauser
5 days ago
Thanks for the show \o

0
1
DOLO
5 days ago
o/

1
0

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
This is why I liked Matt Walshes ‘Am I Racist?’ documentary. He doesn’t need to be /ourguy/ to spread our message. A broke clock is right twice a day.

0
1
Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
the CEO of norco looks jewish as.

1
0

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago

@DoctorK.
Don’t they drink goats milk instead

1
0
BASEDVLAD
5 days ago
See jewish Brave browser a.i. answer is democracy jewish? Very many results

1
0
Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
Lactose intolerance is common in people of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander descent, with a 70–95% chance of being lactose intolerant…

1
0

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago
Liberalism is born out of weakness

1
0
Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
i can’t believe how many articles lefties have written about this. Milk literally is white power aye

1
0

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago
Their success has only been successful, through the compliance of gullible White’s through out History…this needs to stop or we are doomed to extinction!

1
0
Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
ed dutton

0
1
milkFed
5 days ago
We are very much in the minority mindset, only 2k or so views
on these videos. Alot of other proper people like us “growing smaller”, Simply Chalk it up to the Elite or Rich. – Oy Vey

1
0
Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
teals are all white wealthy women who live in rich suburbs who want open borders for Australia but they are all Zionists

1
1
Hide replies
Indo-European
3 days ago
I don’t know about that. I’d say they’re liberal, consensus-followers. Whatever the left-leaning Jewish media are bleating about is their next cause celebre tempered by a modicum of NIMBYism.

1
0
Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
handsome truth retweets jacob… you are worldwide jacob!

1
1

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
Too many Debbie downers in the dissident right.

1
2
Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
u guys should have handsome truth on… he is pushing revolution in the US

0
4
King Tut
2 days ago
Ashlli Bambit getting shot was the fakest shit ever. i guess that makes me a schitzo. she’s an actress that’s living somewhere under a different identity. the whole Jan 6 was a psyop, but i’m sure you all know that by now

Hide replies
King Tut
2 days ago
not sure if links are allowed here but search Odysee for “Everything WRONG with the Capitol Shooting in 21 minutes”. Ashlii Bambit just had a fake blood dripping down her cheek and played dead like a good actress she is.

Hit the mark
3 days ago
the bottom line is when our countries rant about the crime of whites standing together , nations that were before WW2 white countries that the enemy KIKE communist zionist has taken over and is in complete control……It means these governments are invalid and need to be removed.

Mallard Supremacy
4 days ago
ALL COPS ARE PEDOPHILES. Literally…

Whitefreedom
4 days ago
within the political freakshow, voting for change is an illusion. prime ministers and presidents are harvested and developed years previous. they are chosen by jew vermin.

GreatWorks
5 days ago
commenting for the algo

@ElleT
5 days ago
Need a CPA or someone with finance/accounting/tax experience will do?

Hide replies
joeldavis
4 days ago
if you are
a) Australian
b) Willing to help us for free
c) Know your shit about tax laws and regulations
DM me on telegram

@joeldavis

WhiteLightWhiteHeat
5 days ago
“The Halloween Investigation Unit”! Classic! Prayers for you lads.

ThinRedLine
5 days ago

@SpyroTheFascistDragon
he cucked out

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago
True lads bible

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
arh rude lol

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
$5.00
Do you think Australia would benefit from a paleoconservative figure like Pat Buchanan who pushes a pro white message into mainstream message with a more subtle way?

Hide replies
Indo-European
3 days ago
Sure but who would fit the bill? Frank Salter is improving as a speaker but his British Australia Community project is avowedly supportive of White Australia and he is very low profile. Advance’s figurehead Sandra Bourke seems like a lightweight kosher conservative. Ricardo Bosi?Again he has no public profile. Staunch Catholic Tasmanian Senator Brian Harradine might have served but he died ten years ago. She’s served her time with Murdoch and has a Rambam fellowship under her belt but maybe Janet Albrechtsen? Or there’s Andrew Bolt or Alan Jones, both of whom are very well-seasoned. Ross Cameron potentially but he may be a rabid Christian Zionist.
The four men on this panel are probably in the top ten most geopolitically aware members of our race on this continent and they’re all under thirty-five.

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
and to press these nons super hard

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago
Uses a Glasgow kiss

DOLO
5 days ago
lol

ThinRedLine
5 days ago
bitch slap

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
yes

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
my observations red pilled me on abos

M88
5 days ago
spanian is a arab mutt

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
freaking hell im now reading a pubished scientific study of synthetic estrogens being passed through the foodchain from cows to humans. this spiral has gone too far. catchya later guys im interneted out. gonna have a glass of milk and an arimistane pill lol. o/

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
We need to relentlessly push them right.

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
Exactly.

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago
I saw pics of Blair at Tintagel, he probably enjoyed that visit?

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
if i were a jew, id be targeting milk supplies with estrogen since jews cant drink it and whites beast it.

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago

@DoctorK.: That or camels piss, being they’re from the Middle East!

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago

@Ir0nW1LL
filthy bastards lol

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
Tone policing.

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
You got a loicense for that woke faggotry?

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
Seems legit.

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
freaking hell im spiraling down this milk rabbithole. We stand alone, all other races biology suck at milk digestion whereas we beast it.

ThinRedLine
5 days ago
also it is the only way to fight Jewish power

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago

@warren-g
, And who have been the successful architect’s of those lies?…answers on a postage stamp please!

@Alison-Chains
5 days ago
hey

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
wfp.

warren-g
5 days ago

@Ir0nW1LL
its a lie…its un-natural…it cant work in the long term

ThinRedLine
5 days ago
Ban usury

ThinRedLine
5 days ago
Nationalize the banks

@GoyBoy1488
5 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
o/

ThinRedLine
5 days ago
Jewish power

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@DOLO
Nah. They only killed communists.

DOLO
5 days ago

@AryanizedGoebbelsboo
They did. They should have invaded the Soviet Union on bicycle divisions.

ThinRedLine
5 days ago

@GoyBoy1488
o/

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
Jews look at a population of Whites and look for the tall poppies to buy or kneecap.

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
Japan did nothing wrong

@GoyBoy1488
5 days ago
gotcha. just got lost for a second

ThinRedLine
5 days ago

@GoyBoy1488
NS Germany

@GoyBoy1488
5 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
and who would that be?

warren-g
5 days ago

@Ir0nW1LL
do did macarthur

ThinRedLine
5 days ago
Poland was a dictatorship

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago
General Patton found that out too late

ThinRedLine
5 days ago
how can be going against the last people standing up for White people be the right thing

@david_smith
5 days ago
By that logic we should all be zionists because of Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

@GoyBoy1488
5 days ago
best we can do without fedposting is point that out harder this time

@GoyBoy1488
5 days ago

@warren-g
that was literally the only silver lini g i could find

warren-g
5 days ago

@GoyBoy1488
they had it all the last time and didnt do shit either, so fuck them

ThinRedLine
5 days ago
BS

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
sue Mark liebler

@GoyBoy1488
5 days ago
$14.88
Trump sucks, but now the Republicans have the presidency, the senate, congress, and the Supreme Court. There can be no denying that what happens next is completely their fault. Time to deconstruct the GOP and build back with a small mustache o/

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
I’m a Web developer… can i help you joel?

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
The classics are basically free.

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
lactose tolerance, race, and masculinity can be connected to similar arguments originally made during the19th century against colonialized populations and immigration groups. In the 19th century, colonizing populations classified colonized populations as ‘effeminate corn and rice eaters’

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
$5.00
jacob got retweeted by handsome truth… handsome truth might by on jake shields show… you guys should get on handsome truth

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
https://ro.uow.edu.au/asj/vol7/iss2/7/
uni of wollongong was unintentionally based about it lol

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago

@SomeRandomBloke
, They become bitches for blax and latins

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
White Sheets!

Low_Born
5 days ago
American prisons are 3/4 niggers. What is racial balance there?

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
if prison is organised along racial lines, what do white leftists do? refuse to clique up?

ThinRedLine
5 days ago

@DoctorK.
Milk is White power

warren-g
5 days ago

@DoctorK.
people are the only mammals that drink milk into adulthood…maybe we shouldnt drink it

@Ninja404
5 days ago
sure ur not a fed kapow?

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
Everyone eventually will go to prison. No matter what peaceful or violent you do

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
Who wants to spend time in a cell or fox hole with some whiny bitch?

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago

@warren-g
But like, one week i drank over 20l of milk (not evern joking) and i naturally ended up here. This is a rabbithole im gonna have to go down now

ThinRedLine
5 days ago
Humour is dangerous

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
Morale is very important.

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
racial prison gangs? whites, lebos, viets, maoris,abos

warren-g
5 days ago

@DoctorK.
this is my opinion…everything is political if you choose it to be…thats how the other side does it, so why not us

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
o/

warren-g
5 days ago

@SomeRandomBloke
i dont think so

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago

@warren-g
yeah thats what i thought too

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
are Australian prisons racially segregated?

warren-g
5 days ago

@DoctorK.
wow

ThinRedLine
5 days ago
o/

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
they wouldn’t let me keep my gaol breaking for dumbies either

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
theres all these articles if you type in “right wing milk” and these boys are just unironically charging milk on the stream lol

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/03/10/the-alt-right-rebrand-of-raw-milk-00145625

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
jacob should use the defence that he was hailing an uber

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@warren-g
Americans on a daily basis complain that democracy isn’t working. Yet they have millions of guns in their hands.

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
get Mark liebler to represent you

warren-g
5 days ago

@AryanizedGoebbelsboo
i hear you

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
god speed jacob

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@warren-g
Why do we still depend on him? Why do we depend on democracy while knowing that it kills and rapes us?

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
joel is right

warren-g
5 days ago

@AryanizedGoebbelsboo
trump is a pos you satisfied?

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@warren-g
Come on… Look at the wall. Has it stopped any gringos or negroes?

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
joel should start Australian renaissance

warren-g
5 days ago

@AryanizedGoebbelsboo
lol alright, whatever you sy

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
groups beat individuals

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
White unity at every opportunity.

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
Indians are ethnocentric

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
Sadly you cannot build any of those things because democracy is in the way. They will hit you with the hammer. Kill you, put your prison, ruin your life and the list goes on.

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
“we Jews are the destroyers and we will forever destroy”

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago
History has been built on the success of ‘division’ with one small tribe of people profiting from it!

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
jews are hyperethnocentric

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
tom is wrong… the world is turnining into ethnocentric clans who the jews use as weapons against whites

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
Instead of voting. You can [REDACTED FOR FEDPOST]

milkFed
5 days ago
Have an nice night – Get on that Milk Jacob

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
matt walsh wants a divorce for America… he says that the differences between irreconcilable

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@SomeRandomBloke
:moai:

@ItWasMadeUp
5 days ago
Great points by Joel

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@SammichLubber
God.. everyone knows he never will. Since 10 years ago. Why do people still except that to happen?

warren-g
5 days ago

@AryanizedGoebbelsboo
you know what i mean

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
if white people collectivise, the adl will go after them… whites go after jared taylor even when he tried to welcome jews into the movement

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
toms gonna smash a whole litre and a half of milk in this podcast. Joel has barely touched his. I’m also starting to think that Blaire must have drank all of his milk before the stream. There isn’t enough milk to satiate Jake.. and Mark Collet is wearing a jummper and drinking milk in england.

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
Trump has yet to utter the phrase ‘White people’.

M88
5 days ago
btw tenacious d is a jew

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@warren-g
He isn’t failing. He is doing it like intendent. Its his plan

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
Oh you advocating for white people? Off to prison you go! Oh you funding white groups? Off to Prison? Oh you are building networks? Off to prison for terrorism.

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
You can’t even do anything peaceful. As you start doing something peaceful. The hammer hits you

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
If only that was true

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
ironically israel is national socialist

milkFed
5 days ago
Weak people these days, Dysgenic collapse – Capitalist welfare state

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@SammichLubber
Well what do you except? 79 years of victory of the others. All we got was decadence, lack of morality and democracy that kills whites. And ever since 79 years ago people have tried to get in power let it be peacefully or violently. Nothing succesful at all.

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
Dutton doesn’t seem to understand sexual crypsis in humans and its ramifications.

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
everyone sip milk

milkFed
5 days ago
Edward dutton – The spiteful Mutant

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
The purple headed freaks are the true accelerationists.

@LargeinCharge
5 days ago
Spiteful Mutants

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
in Australia, the most white suburbs are the most left wing suburbs ironically

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago
Die-versity proves this point

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@SammichLubber
So nothing new has happened? Democracy is still standing

@SammichLubber
5 days ago

@AryanizedGoebbelsboo
Sure but it happened the day after Trump won. So there is a ripple effect to consider.

milkFed
5 days ago
Good idea Tom

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@SammichLubber
Woah.. let me guess they will replace it with another democratic bullshit thing

@SpyroTheFascistDragon
5 days ago
the new patriot act

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
paul joseph watson talks about architecture

@SpyroTheFascistDragon
5 days ago
trump will put this into practice

@SpyroTheFascistDragon
5 days ago
https://www.heritage.org/progressivism/report/project-esther-national-strategy-combat-antisemitism

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
I heard the German coalition gov is falling apart.

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@SomeRandomBloke
Why not? What took him so long to make that happen?

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
I voted Ron Paul in ’88 and not at all Tuesday.

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
Would it be a problem to volunteer to the Iranian side if in a fictional timeline if the Iran war was to start?

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
jews hate whites so much it doesn’t matter how much we do for them, they still hate us

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
Would it be a problem if that war with Iran was to start. Who should we side it?

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
80% of Jews voted for Harris

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
They never have done anything

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
look. at Canada… left wing political victory moves the conservatives to the left

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago
Imagine X being in the hands of Torba!

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
Real inflation is up ~ %10 a year for 4 years and everyone feels it.

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
x is gold…i troll on it all day

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
gab is the best

@SpyroTheFascistDragon
5 days ago
you’re being played

@SpyroTheFascistDragon
5 days ago
to get Trump elected

@SpyroTheFascistDragon
5 days ago
Wrong. they will clamp down on WNs online and irl now that giving them any voice has outlived the purpose

@ItWasMadeUp
5 days ago
It’s like the UK protestors, the J6’ers are political prisoners, he should pardon them if he has any morals.

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
he pardoned jonathan pollard

Mighty_Whitey
5 days ago
if they ain’t black or jewish, they’re fucked

@SpyroTheFascistDragon
5 days ago
Donald trump only pardons BLACKS

@SpyroTheFascistDragon
5 days ago
no,

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
I say we shit all over Trump and the other civnats at every opportunity.

@Galileo’sTongue
5 days ago
It also gives our enemies more time to plan and prepare.

milkFed
5 days ago
Only got 40 years or so :smiling_face_with_tear:

@ItWasMadeUp
5 days ago
$5.00
I don’t often get to watch your live broadcasts, so I just wanted to say keep up the good work.

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
jared taylor is philosemitic

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago

@MarkCollett
, Was Blairs visit to Cornwall, before or after the Conference?

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@SomeRandomBloke
Why would they leave to Israel? They need to keep puppets to keep Israel alive.

milkFed
5 days ago
I actually made an Promise if Kamala got in, id celebrate by going to the Pub, after an few months. White Americans are practically the same people, this was bad for us.

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
should we be zionists to get all Jews to move to israel?

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@david_smith
Well David did try the democratic way to gain some power. It only resulted with the hammer of democracy landing on him.

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
narh his hands are all fuked up

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@SomeRandomBloke
Just writing his name made my coincidence detector go insane

@SpyroTheFascistDragon
5 days ago
groypers are pubic lice on MAGA’s dick, irrelevant

@david_smith
5 days ago

@SomeRandomBloke
He should have written himself in

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
isn’t stephen miller jewish? he is pretty based on immigration

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@SomeRandomBloke
Sadly people depend on something useless out of desperation… Everyone has tried to come democratically in power. They all failed and even if they faced victories they were very short lived.

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
have u seen jd Vance wife?

@SpyroTheFascistDragon
5 days ago
the heritage foundation is jewish as fuck

Mighty_Whitey
5 days ago
more jews voted for the right this year than ever before

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
The only people who support Israel. Sheeps to Jews or you are jewish 100%

@david_smith
5 days ago
Lots of Christian believe that too

Mighty_Whitey
5 days ago
nah

@david_smith
5 days ago

@Mighty_Whitey
80% voted for Kamala

Dirty White Boy
5 days ago
$14.00
you said earlier that there were about 20 million illegals in the US. The official number has been 11 million. They’ve put out that number since the 1980s. I forced chatGPT to do an analysis of the actual data and cumulate it, and it suggests that since the 60s, we have absorbed about 60 million +

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@Mighty_Whitey
No wonder some people resort to accelerationism…

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
maybe if his Jews say ” yes trumpy, go be barbaric, so we can finally save Israel. maybe then,they might hard deport but prob not

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago
Selected, not elected

Mighty_Whitey
5 days ago
Jews voted for Trump this time

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago
did you see David duke voted for jill stein?

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago

@dirtywhiteboy
the figure currently stands at 66 gorrilion.

Mark Collett
5 days ago

@SomeRandomBloke
hi mate!

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago

Open Borders for Israel
5 days ago

@MarkCollett
hi Mark!

Dirty White Boy
5 days ago
$5.00
That figure of 60 million doesn’t even include Biden’s presidency.

Mark Collett
5 days ago
Joel loves Nick!

milkFed
5 days ago
Anyone who Voted Trump is an Luke Warm Conservative. Remember Both sides are controlled

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@david_smith
Due to manipulation. Go look at the muslims in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain and Egypt. The muslims support Israel too

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
his family’s Jew… his words

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
The powers that be are on board with Trump II electric boogaloo. You can see it in the msm with them trying to placate the radical left.

Mighty_Whitey
5 days ago
^

milkFed
5 days ago
Just figureheads, trump getting in stopped many of our people from waking up. suffering will go on longer

Mighty_Whitey
5 days ago
we’ve already been through this 8 years ago

Mighty_Whitey
5 days ago
there won’t be any mass deportations

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
ima throw on a sloppy joe and screw dad outta his morning cuppa.

@katana17
5 days ago
[Know More News — Christopher Bollyn, The Man Who Solved 9/11 — TRANSCRIPT]

Know More News — Christopher Bollyn, The Man Who Solved 9/11 — TRANSCRIPT

@katana17
5 days ago
Org joo did 9/11

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
Donald hates WP. hope its a double cross tho

Mighty_Whitey
5 days ago
juju cum

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
I want trump to enact TND, A return to hyperborea and state mandated Aryan Big tiddy goth girlfriends to any mf.

milkFed
5 days ago
Good old Saturated fats, Only whites can digest as much Milk

Mighty_Whitey
5 days ago
Trump is mericas favorite WWE character at the moment

@sparkofspirit
5 days ago
lol

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@Ir0nW1LL
I agree. its a craze.

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
what the hell is going on the boys are all wearing jumpers and drinking milk. am i missing something lol

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago
Tom getting his calcium fix

milkFed
5 days ago
An fellow milk drinking Celt o/

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago

@AryanizedGoebbelsboo
, They do like a rubber necklace back home

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
duh

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
to hide the ned Kelly plate

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
where even are these boys that they all are wearing jumpers lol

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
well as a fair race, we might as well stomp back…it is cultural after all

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@Ir0nW1LL
Oh jesus i forgot that…

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago
God help them if any tyres are laying around near by!

Mighty_Whitey
5 days ago
it’s lack of morality

Mighty_Whitey
5 days ago

Ziohazard
5 days ago
Osama was born in Saudi Arabia but he moved to Sudan

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
Only White men are assumed to have agency and free will.

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
Shieettt i dindu nuffin! Judges: You are right. You are free!

@deathcamp_counselor
5 days ago
stickers scare the shit out of the authorities. It doesn’t take much…

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
They wouldn’t go after those such terrorists. Because those terrorists are state agents

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago
Bolshevik play book

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@david_smith
Everyone will eventually end up on TV. Even if you are a peaceful guy.

@david_smith
5 days ago
Hey it is that famous guy from the TV
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/melbourne-neo-nazi-charged-over-police-intimidation/vi-AA1tF47z?#details

DOLO
5 days ago
Sounds Talmudic

@deathcamp_counselor
5 days ago
a Rothschild satellite state I’d presume

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
dumbie cops need to git WP or they can live next to clanging dish washing dot heads and fuked up bins forever

milkFed
5 days ago
Always was, Always will be British commonwealth Land.

Mighty_Whitey
5 days ago
*smacks lips

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
they dreamed of 80s action, but instead they choose traitor goon

milkFed
5 days ago
The Boomers, GEEZ from 1st hand experiance they are Oblivous” and seemly not capable of understanding or resisting the wickness of todays world. In somekind of day dream – Oy Vey

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@Ziohazard
At first he supposedly live in Saudi Arabia

Ziohazard
5 days ago
Osman was apparently a millionaire living in Sudan

@deathcamp_counselor
5 days ago
Tim Osman

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
I hate it how there needs to be “Islamic terrorist” (Everyone knows (((who))) finances and arms those groups) attacks for people to move to nationalism so that the goddman overton window can shift so that progress can atleast be done.

@david_smith
5 days ago
Osama was an agent used against the Russians.

@deathcamp_counselor
5 days ago

@DoctorK.
make your own!

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
I doubt if “Osama Bin Laden” was even a real person. Or just some US agent

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
where do you get the NSN stickers tho? i rag out antifag posters with graffiti but would slap that NSN shit religiously.

Hess’ Channel
5 days ago
Senator Paterson clip from Nov 6th 2024

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@deathcamp_counselor
* The whole west is

@deathcamp_counselor
5 days ago
Australia seems like the testbed for the tikkun olam jewish prison planet

milkFed
5 days ago
You guys should publicly shame them when they Quote Grossly offensive behaviour – Not even offensive in the slightest. :high_voltage:

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@deathcamp_counselor
Its nothing but a bunch of lies. They want Netanyahu to be brutal on Palestinians, Lebanese, Syrians, Jordanians (funny because they are bootlickers to the jews) basically they want Netanyahu to enact Greater Israel.

@deathcamp_counselor
5 days ago

@AryanizedGoebbelsboo
wow…I guess thats not surprising. The media is trying to sell it like the jews are a moral people rebelling against the lone psycho Satanyahu

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
Spooky men in masks with a Scary ideology! Oh my god! Such scary terrorism. Meanwhile Actual Terrorist groups plan fire bombings, stabbings, shootings and suicide bombings.

@SammichLubber
5 days ago
Morning fellas.

milkFed
5 days ago
Oy Vey

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@deathcamp_counselor
Netanyahu isn’t able to keep the jewish supremacist coalition stable. They are angry because he isn’t violent enough and they see him causing problems and making jews look weak.

@deathcamp_counselor
5 days ago
i heard there’s some kinda insurrection in Pissrael overthrowing Netanyahu. fishy as all things jewish are…

milkFed
5 days ago
Not even slightly offensive

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
Just in. Reports of violence in the street in Chicago.

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
Only 5 years?

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
most watch tucker or gayer shit

@deathcamp_counselor
5 days ago
I’m wondering if any boomers in Australia have shown any interest in what you guy are doing or are they all as retarded as they are in the states?

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
can’t they also charge the people who threaten baby Hitler

@Sweet_Nerevar
5 days ago
can’t even have human shaped targets….. someone could be offended

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
i love how tom dedicated his life to being a thorn in people’s flesh over what he believes in lol

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago

@DOLO
My muscles became bigger than Cottrell after subscribing

DOLO
5 days ago
I grew 2″ after subscribing.

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
If you don’t subscribe to JoelDavis you get barred from the ethnostate.

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
I don’t like the police at all. Sheeps of the state. But many of them happen to be whites. And they will be easily replaced with racial strangers.

Ziohazard
5 days ago
Tom said the truck driver was Iranian

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
What a manly name

Archive Mr.AG
5 days ago
So all of those idiots are crying “The US has become a fascist country lead by a dictator!” I really wish that was the case

Dr.KAPOW
5 days ago
nobody asked these boys to go through any of this drama, they just actually have the knackers to stand up for what they believe in. To me, that’s hardcore, and admirable.

@Ir0nW1LL
5 days ago
Stasi tactics

Ziohazard
5 days ago

@MarkCollett
I appreciate you fighting for our people. Most Brits are cucked.

Ziohazard
5 days ago

@MarkCollett
At my workplace here in America half of the workers are White.

Mark Collett
5 days ago

@Ziohazard
Demographically, it is worse in America, but America is a vast country made up of 50 states, Britain is tiny.

Ziohazard
5 days ago
Mark do you think the racial situation is worse in America or Britain? Seems pretty bad in both.

Mark Collett
5 days ago

@Ziohazard
Translation: shit stirring losers are saying…

Ziohazard
5 days ago

@MarkCollett
People are saying that Ayatollah guy is Turkish.

Mark Collett
5 days ago

@Ziohazard
What are you babbling about? We’ve never had a Turk speak at our conference.

Ziohazard
5 days ago
Mark why did you have a Turk speak at your conference? I like you but Turks are historical enemies of Europeans.

@Moonman
5 days ago
morning/evening Mark

Ziohazard
5 days ago
Do you guys want all the Europeans to mix together or stay as separate ethnicities? I am curious because mixing all the Europeans together is not what the National Socialists in Germany wanted but you guys seem not to have a problem with it.

ChainReaction
5 days ago
charged for saying HE WON’T BREAK THE LAW… welcome to Straya

@Moonman
5 days ago
All these pricks are in desperate need of redacted

War_Goose
5 days ago
$10.00
good morning brothers

@Bogus1
5 days ago
bigly

ChainReaction
5 days ago
trumpsteinbergowitz will save us o/

Callaghan
5 days ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE 0/

@katana17
5 days ago
[Joel Davis – Fuck off We’re Full – with Tom and Jacob – Oct 24, 2024 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – Fuck off We’re Full – with Tom and Jacob – Oct 24, 2024 – Transcript

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

/>

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: Live. It is the 26 September 2024. Another episode of the show.

 

We’re back on Twitter. We had an incredible viewership on Twitter last week. We got way more views on Twitter than we get on any other platform. But our Rumble audience sustained. We got the same amount of views on the Rumble stream as we did the week before. Plus all these extra Twitter views. A big expansion of the audience just from broadcasting to Twitter now.

 

So as I said last week, I can’t believe we didn’t do this earlier, but it’s really nice to get that kind of response. And it feels like the show, man, I remember going back to last year when my YouTube was banned. We had a Joel and Blair show YouTube account that was banned. Then my YouTube was banned. I think Blair got a YouTube account banned as well. So we got hammered! We got completely wiped out on YouTube, and that was a real blow.

 

And then we were shunted onto Rumble. And we were already on Odysee and Cozy, but we’re shunted onto Rumble and we have to build up from scratch on Rumble.

 

And then this year, we got the Rumble audience back up to where it peaked on YouTube and then actually went past the peak YouTube audience. So we grew the show bigger on Rumble than it ever was on YouTube, and that felt like an achievement.

 

And then we then just now added a Twitter audience that then more than doubled the audience that we already had. So being de-platformed off YouTube has never been this good. Fuck YouTube! We don’t need YouTube. We’re now pulling, you know, three times the audience for the show that we were pulling when we were on YouTube a year ago. So that feels really good that we were able to withstand that hit. That really sucked at the time. And it felt a lot., … You know, if you told me a year in a year’s time, the show will have three times as many viewers, even though you’re still banned from YouTube, I would have probably not believed you. So kudos to everyone tuning in. Feels really good that we were able to basically take that blow and keep soldering on. Fuck YouTube! Fuck Google! Fuck ZOG! Hail Elon Musk! Hail our people!

 

But anyway, let’s get into the show. Blair, you want to? It’s grand final weekend here in Australia, and that means for Victorians, we don’t have to go to work tomorrow. So that’s pretty sick. But sports ball is kind of gay. I’m sure they’ll do some, like, gay abo [Aboriginal] shit at the beginning and maybe some just gay actual gay shit as well. Sometimes they Chuck that in with the gay abo shit! So I won’t be watching it. I don’t give a fuck about it! But you had some thoughts.

 

Blair Cottrell: Big sports ball weekend. That’s what we’re about to experience, especially in Victoria. Victoria was the birthplace of the Australian Football League [AFL] or Aussie Rules football.

 

So everyone’s looking forward to four days off. The holidays begin tomorrow, Friday, Saturday, Sunday is the sort of sporting experience, sports ball experience. And then I think Monday people get off as well. And there’s a real retard vibe out there. I just went to the gym and got home a little bit late and people are driving erratically, lining up at bottle shops, takeaway food shops and just getting in the way and being more retarded than usual. And it’s because this is the last day they had to work before sportsball weekend. So they’re just very excited for that reason and more retarded than usual for that reason as well.

 

A little bit frustrating for me because I’m completely disconnected from the public consciousness. I’m able to feel it, but I’m not connected to it. I’m still removed, so I can observe it, I can sort of read it, but it doesn’t rub off on me so much and I just want to go about my business as normal. But not everyone is as cynical as I am.

 

So I’m not trying to say you can’t enjoy your football. Like, we have a big sporting culture in Australia and I come from an AFL family myself, so I can appreciate it. Some watch, some somewhat. There’s a certain sort of soldierly aspect to the football player. They do do a lot of intensive training and they do have a lot of personal pride and team pride, like that sort of camaraderie, you might say that similar to like a battalion, or a political group like the like you boys are involved in.

 

So I can appreciate it, I can respect it. But the average peasant that sort of goes to the sports ball games and gets all hysterical and drunk and who looks forward to drinking a lot and taking a lot of drugs on sportsball weekends, they’re out in force right now and it’s just a little bit annoying.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I think there’s something special about it. Whenever you talk to non-Whites and they mention Australian culture, it’s the first thing that they do mention. They say:

 

“Oh, yeah, foottie and beer and meat pies.”

 

And look, I think football can be saved. I think certainly when we take state power we can certainly de-commercialise football, refocus on its localness and we can do a lot for football. We can make sports ball great again, certainly.

 

And as you said, there’s a martial component to it which is valuable. Australian soldiers were so highly regarded in the First and Second World War because we’re like a footy nation, like we’re a sporting nation and the Germans, the British. There’s lots of historical accounts of commentary on how Australian and New Zealand soldiers were of great stock and just great physical composition. And a lot of it is due to better diet and better exercise. So and just being a new colony as well. But I won’t get too caught up in that.

 

[05:34]

 

But what I will say about the weekend is I think the whole experience that go like, because I talk to the guys that work about, I am connected to it in the sense that everyone I work with, I’m the alien. Everyone I work with is obsessed with football. And I don’t want to get too like a psychoanalysis on it, but there’s something about the process, the ecstasis and the catharsis. There’s something about cheering and being disappointed or cheering and being happy at the end. There is some sort of strange spiritual, there is a metaphysics to it, certainly, that they, that does exist within the psyche of the majority of the population that should be nurtured and taken care of in a positive way. Obviously it’s been commercialised. It’s been made gay and pro-aboriginal and all this sort of nonsense! So obviously it’s been hijacked.

 

My main criticism of the nationalists that came before us is in Australia is their lack of, and I mean before us. I’m talking about the generation before. It’s not five years before we came on the scene, but the people that were around 30, 40 years before UPF [United Patriots Front] existed, or we came on the scene, they should have focused on AFL. If they had focused in the seventies and eighties on politicizing AFL for the Right-wing and bringing about a will to power and making that a central part of Australian nationalism back then, the movement as a whole would be just so well established. Because in Europe we have these intergenerational nationalists, intergenerational families of nationalists that did this at the end of the Second World War.

 

And a lot of the firms in England and a lot of the hooligan clubs in Europe, most of them are National Socialists or fascists or just very, very Right-wing. And that took a long time to develop that culture, that subculture within the football. And football in Europe is very political! But in America and Australia it’s very gay! It’s very anti-political. It’s very depoliticised to the point where it’s just anti-White. It’s so non-political that they’re then in the absence of a political nature of the sport, the state apparatus and the corporate state apparatus have managed to infiltrate and put their astroturf, fake culture, not a grassroots nationalist culture, which is what it should be.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s modern day coliseum. It’s just the coliseum. There’s a tribal aspect to the energy there. It’s something we’ve failed to tap into politically, but not entirely. We did take a banner to the footy once, remember? Probably 2016, I think that was.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that caused such an hysterical reaction from the AFL official community. I mean, like the AFL administrative officers, because they couldn’t believe that someone had the guts [chuckling] to actually walk in there with a Right-wing banner and display it right in front of the scoreboard in front of everyone in the middle of a game!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: And they realised that they can’t actually stop people from doing that. Like, all we did was put that banner under my shirt. I just wore a baggy jacket and I walked in and paid for my ticket.xLike, anyone. And how are they able to identify everyone who’s going in there? That’s a lot. There’s like hundreds of how many people. Tens of thousands of people going into that.

 

Joel Davis: Especially if you larp as a fat guy!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, that’s actually exactly what I did. What was the game? It was Essendon versus.

 

Thomas Sewell: Collingwood.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah. And I bought an oversized Collingwood jacket. I didn’t even support Collingwood just to conceal the banner and I never wore it again. I don’t know what happened to that jacket. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Your dad’s probably got it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe, [chuckling] but Dad tends to wear the baggier jackets. He’s of that generation.

 

But the point was there’s no way they can actually stop us doing stuff like that. I’m kind of disappointed that no one’s done anything like that since. And even in us, I suppose, for not replicating that kind of activity. But who knows? Plenty of potential for that in the future.

 

Thomas Sewell: We’ll get back to it. We’re just trying to build up the footy boy culture at the moment. So it’s important, I think, for there to be an innate organic culture of people that already go to the footy.

 

And so we’ve recruited a lot of people this year and probably 5% are avid football fans, which is an improvement from the 0% that we’ve had in the past. Most people that we’ve recruited over the years have wanted nothing to do with AFL, just because of its de-politicisation and its anti-White nature.

 

But now that we’re becoming larger as a movement, we are starting to tap into a bit more sportsball fans, which is good. I actually appreciate that. I want that. I want to build a subculture of people that like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, we’ve definitely been too dismissive of football fans as though they’re beneath our politics for some reason, which is a little bit arrogant, I think we should really be tapping into the, …

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s got to be a class marriage, there’s got to be a class marriage and there’s different classes of politically active people. And what we need to focus on. We’ve been a Spearhead for a long time. We need to focus on, “inclusivity” is a bad dirty word these days, but we do need to focus on mobilising further classes of political agency.

 

[11:00]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think I understand the take. Though, when people say:

 

“Oh, look at all these grown men giving so much emotion and concern for some football team, but they put absolutely zero time, effort, resources or emotion into saving their nation or the existential threat that our people feel.”

 

And I do have that contempt myself. I do understand it.

 

So I get that. But you said this before, Tom, and I agree we kind of need to pick one team and put all the racist energy behind them and make them the racist team.

 

And so all the Lefties, like, start hating that particular team and then they become notorious. And then young racists get, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s already happened to some degree, like the wogs*. The wogs notoriously support Carlton. Carlton’s notoriously supported by wogs. And Collingwood is like the team of the White Aussie Bogans. So that already organically took place to some degree.

 

[* Wog is a racial slur used to refer, in British English, to black and South Asian people, and, in Australian English, to people from the Mediterranean region. Whilst it is extremely derogatory in British English, in Australian English it may be considered non-offensive depending on how the word is used, due to reclamation and changing connotations. Wikipedia]

 

Thomas Sewell: And St Kilda is the team of the coke snorting builders.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: I remember a friend of ours, Patrick O’Sullivan, shout out to Patrick O’Sullivan.

 

Thomas Sewell: Shout out to the Reverend!

 

Joel Davis: Hail Combat 18 and death to ZOG!

 

Anyway, he said that back in the day, St Kilda, because St Kilda is a very jewish area in Melbourne. It’s like one of the most jewish suburbs of Melbourne for those who are foreigners and don’t know. Their football team, it actually has the red, white and black.

 

So it’s the same colours as, like the Imperial German colours. And the jews got very upset about this and lobbied for it to be changed and obviously it was unsuccessful. So that’s kind of like a funny piece of history.

 

But yeah, I think we got to pick a team and make them the Nazi team. I don’t know which team it is, but like when we figure it out, let me know. I’ll buy all the gear, I’ll wrap it and, … It’ll happen organically.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’ll happen organically.

 

Joel Davis: I’ll be a watching the games. And yeah, I’ll get into, …

 

Blair Cottrell: [words unclear] Victorian thing.

 

Thomas Sewell: A series of players and they’ll refuse to do the latest jargon, whatever the latest political humiliation ritual is. Eventually, like we saw with that Welcome to Country recently, was that the semi-final or the preliminary?

 

Blair Cottrell: I think so.

 

Thomas Sewell: And how many of those players were looking at the ground or scoffing. So the body language is already like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s already resisting.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, there is a resistance and all it’s going to take is one, similar to, there was a scandal probably five or six years ago with an islander rugby player that didn’t he say something on Facebook about how like:

 

“Fags aren’t going to heaven.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Folau or Falou?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, he said something on Facebook like:

 

“Gays aren’t going to heaven.”

 

Joel Davis: He’s a Mormon.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. And then the NRL tried to remove him and then I think he took them to court. I can’t remember whether he won or lost, but that set a really important precedence that you can stand up to these institutions and there is going to be a lot of support from the public and it is worth dragging it through the courts. It is worth not necessarily being a political Martyr, but it is worth taking a stand, win or lose.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it would be good to, …

 

Thomas Sewell: It’ll happen again.

 

Joel Davis: Like if, like one of these teams, if they do like a mass walk off of the Welcome to Country, then, okay, we’ll get behind them. NSN will be at the next game. [chuckling] We’ll be there shaking around the scarves or whatever.

 

But I guess one thing about AFL, which is good is that it is a very White sport. Like if you watch the English Premier League or the NFL or like the equivalent in other countries, which they are, there’s a lot of non-Whites. Like, it’s almost majority non-White, I would say, like these leagues. I know they’re completely different sports. But AFL is like even that now they’re starting to bring some blacks into its still like 95% White.

 

Thomas Sewell: They’re doing programs. So if you’re Aboriginal or black, you’re, they’re being hyper selected. There’s a lot of programs at the moment for Sudanese youth and for Aboriginal youth to just play footy full-time. They’re just trying to astroturf the sport full of brown people. There’s no such thing for Whites, for White kids. If you’re a twelve year old, 14 year old, you’re a White kid at high school, there’s no programme for you to just play footy full-time.

 

But when I was doing Resi-care because all the kids on paper were written down as Aboriginal, even though they weren’t, they all had these openings. They all could, because they weren’t going to school anyway. So they can just go to this like, this football thing. Especially in the Northern Territory and wherever, like there’s like refugees being sent. And the purpose of it is to inorganically stack the AFL. To basically branch stack it. They basically want to branch stack it. They want to fudge the statistics, they want to fudge the representation.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you reckon the way Australian football, like the rules are set up, it makes it a sport that’s kind of favours the Anglo Saxon predisposition, genetic predisposition, because it’s not just endurance, but you need ball skills, team skills, you need to work together as a unit. There’s a great deal of discipline that goes into being a professional footballer in that field.

 

[16:24]

 

Thomas Sewell: I wouldn’t say Anglo Saxon. I would say, and it’s ironic that it is your exact racial description. I would say it favours Celto-Nordics. I would say it’s a sport that favours the Nordic, the traditional German racial classification of what Nordics are and favours, I think. And it’s, and it comes from a Celtic background. I mean, its origin is a modified version of Gaelic football, which again, was a martial art designed by the Celts to maintain an army under British occupation. Basically all Celtic sports were built like that.

 

And that’s why we did it. That’s why we’ve done it for a long time, why it’s absolutely crucial we continue to do it.

 

And obviously because it favours the longer, the longer tendon and limb length. You know, most footballers are quite tall and long limbed, like all sort of running and throwing sports. Yeah, they’re lean, they’re endurant. It doesn’t necessarily favour like kind of Denarids or lower Saxons or like short, stocky guys or mountainous people. It doesn’t really suit that kind of type. It suits the kind of Nordic plain runners. So and, but there’s that type. There’s that build. There’s that AFL build in almost every race except probably Asians. There is that build. But obviously, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, there’s no Chinaman playing AFL.

 

Thomas Sewell: No. And obviously there’s a lot of reasons for that, but, yeah, they certainly don’t organically have that kind of build. It’s suited or Celto-Nordics. And unfortunately, Central Africans. Central Africans are going to be very good at it if they can stack enough of them with it.

 

So if they can run programs to promote Central Africans,

 

Joel Davis: Which they are.

 

Thomas Sewell: West Africans are too fast, twitch. They’re probably better for rugby and power sports. And East Africans are too endurant, they’re too brittle. So, but Central Africans are a hybrid of the two. So they would actually make good AFL players if the sport was to be played over there, unfortunately. That doesn’t mean I’m not a racist anymore! That’s just a genetic fact.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, family members of mine that have been draughted and have played in the past, they’re all long limbs sprinters, jumpers, lean endurance. So that there’s something to what you’re saying for sure.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. And what the advantage of the Whiteman is, it’s just that we’ve got the brain on the sporting field or on the battlefield. The Whiteman didn’t conquer Africa or these other continents because we’re like infinitely physically superior in terms of muscle mass or strength, although we’re definitely a lot better than Indians. Indian men have lower upper body strength than White women. That’s a fact. Which is, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Even grip strength.

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, yeah. Upper body strength, grip strength.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s interesting because that makes them bad rapists! You’d think that’d be like, …

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s why they’re gang rapists.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh right! They need to work together. I see, I see.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s how their continent works.

 

But, yeah, certainly the reason why we’ve been such great conquerors and the reason why we also, as a race, good sportsmen or kind of obsessed with sports is more to do with the tactics involved in the sport. You don’t win by just being more athletic than the opposition. You win by having better teamwork and better communication. And that’s where the Whiteman excels.

 

So when you take away all the White coaches and all the White culture and all the White establishment around these English soccer teams, for example, and it’s just Africans coaching Africans. They’re not going to be as good as the White team. You know, they’re only good because they’re propped up.

 

I think Hitler says something in Mein Kampf about how you can basically, you can teach an African to do an opera or to be a conductor, or you can teach an African to play a musical instrument and do jazz, or you can teach an African to be a politician, even. Like one day they might in France. I think he makes like this little subtle mock of the French saying, like:

 

“One day there’ll be African politicians in France. They’ll manage to teach one like that.”

 

But ultimately it’s still a Whiteman that taught him to do that. So that’s an important distinction. That’s straight MK, that’s straight Mein Kampf. That’s important to know.

 

Blair Cottrell: Straight Pastor Manning too. Remember Pastor Manning? He said:

 

“Talk to a black man. I don’t care! He could be an astrophysicist, or a doctor. You talk to him. He’s got no fucking sense!”

 

I [chuckling] remember that Pastor Manning. If no one’s seen Pastor Manning, it’s kind of an old meme now, but it’s still a good laugh if you can find it.

 

Thomas Sewell: The only sense Africans make is when they’re talking about women, especially their own women. They understand their own women very well.

 

Blair Cottrell: And is that why they avoid them? [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: [chuckling] That’s why they make good comedians, because they usually just complain about women and they’re really funny when do it, because it’s just spot on! They know exactly what’s going on there. Because they’re operating on a lower Chakra. Their masters of like the lowest dimension because that’s where they live. That’s where they’re always gyrating and moving their hips around because all their energy is actually in their, … They don’t have any higher Chakra.

 

Joel Davis: The use the word “arse” to describe everything.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, everything’s “arse, shit”.

 

Joel Davis:

 

“Yo, arse! Oh, yeah, I saw y’all arse down the street. You know what I mean?”

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, yeah. Between their dick and their ass, that’s where all their energy is. That’s why their pants are saggy. Like, they crip walk. All their energy is down there. So they understand that realm quite well because that’s where they live. They live in the shit!

Blair Cottrell: Harsh [chuckling] but fair! Yeah, well, look, we’ve begun by talking about football. We’ve unbelievably segued into a racial discussion. What are we going to bring it back to, what’s our next subject?

 

Joel Davis: Let’s actually get into like the bread and butter of the show this evening because we’ve done a little bit of waiting for people to get in.

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s 1, 300 viewers and we’re just talking about sportsball. It’s hilarious!

 

Joel Davis: No, so let’s, what I wanted to discuss tonight, and it will bridge into another aspect of this, but I want to discuss the principle of building nationalism from the ground up. That’s what I titled the stream.

 

We’ve covered this kind of thing on the show before, but I think this is important to go back over and discuss it between three of us, because that’s basically what we’re trying to do. We believe that, not necessarily happy about it, that we have to build nationalism from the ground up. We would like to be able to cut the line. We’d like to be able to build it from the top down or skip a few stages ahead.

 

But we don’t see that as possible. We see that basically we’re in a position where we’re building from square one. Our ancestors have completely let us down and handed us down. They didn’t hand it a baton of anything. We’re like starting the race from the very beginning, from the very start line. And there’s a lot of people that agree with us on the problem. They agree with us that Whites are being replaced, Whites are being genocided. The jews are the primary enemy of our people.

 

But we’ve got all of these White traitors. We’ve got liberalism. We’ve got this kind of cucked humanitarian ideology permeating through our people that prevents us from seeing politics in the correct way. And that is kind of used, Holocaust narrative, colonialism narrative, et cetera, used to demonise us, demonise organising on behalf of White people. They’ll agree and have good talking points about on all these issues.

 

But then their view is that:

 

“Well, okay, but if we can just influence the conservative movement or if we can influence the current establishment and move into elite positions, there’s some way in which we can redirect the ship.”

 

And there’s all different kinds of approaches that more or less fit underneath these categories. And I would love that to be true!

 

A few years ago if I wind back the clock, you know, four years, five years, I thought more that maybe something like that could be possible and that maybe there would be elements of the elite that could be won over and that a strategy like that potentially could work. And I became disabused with that notion over time. And I’m sure you guys probably did as well at one point, have more of that kind of thought. Where you thought of more of a conservative mainstream political movement would be potentially enough.

 

But I think we’ve all seen enough and experienced enough, particularly in Australia. But this is true around the world where we don’t actually think that’s going to be possible. We realise that in order for White interests to be asserted politically, White people have to get organised from the grassroots! We have to come together at the absolute base foundation, bring our men together, bring our money together, and build from the ground up so that we can get to a position where we have enough power emanating from us as a people, independently from us as a people that isn’t subject to the Liberal ideology of the White traitors or to jewish interests or whatever, all these economic interests from people who profit from globalisation and the perpetuation of the status quo, but could instead, in a revolutionary way, assert White interests. Particularly and only because it’s fundamentally backed by White power, White people, White money for explicitly pro-White reasons. And that’s a very difficult thing to build. Because you’re trying to build from scratch against the hostile system. And it’s pretty hard to sell it at first. If you have a pre-existing institution, it’s easy to convince people to put their money and manpower and faith in it.

 

But when you’re starting from scratch and you only have a small amount of people and a dream and a vision, that’s quite difficult. But we see no other way. Because nothing exists in Australia that we can see that is filling that role. And so we’re basically starting from square one and trying to build something that could fill that role.

 

Blair Cottrell: What does starting from square one physically look like?

 

Joel Davis: It physically looks like, I think step one is what we’re doing is just trying to get White men organised around the principle of a no compromise White nationalism a pure White nationalism, a pure pro-White position around the country. And they’re going to be paying dues into the same pot and bringing along their wives and girlfriends and bringing their mates baby from work or something, or they went to school with. And we’re doing the streams like this. We’re putting the message out, we’re doing street activism and so on to put the message out:

 

“Hey, we exist! Hey, White Australia, someone’s going to stand on behalf of you! There’s actually another option than just passively accepting the kind of gradual genocide of our people and just trying to advance your own individual interests within the decaying and collapsing civilisation and a system that’s taking away more and more of your dignity and well being and your children’s future, piece by piece, every day. There is a resistance movement!”

 

As we grow larger, as we get more professional, that message will get louder, it will get more attractive, and we’ll bring in more and more people, and then they’ll make us able to make it louder and more attractive, and we’ll bring in more people and more resources and so on until we can swell to a size where we have enough men, and we have enough money and we’ve bought out a whole series of land, businesses. We’ve got people on the payroll of all these different specifications, and we have a parallel economy for our activists, so that we have a political party, we’re running political candidates, we’re full spectrum. We’re doing all the different functions. We’re doing a big conferences, we’ve got a sophisticated media arm and so on, where we are a serious, fully fledged, well funded political movement.

 

And when that exists, then we can present to White Australia a genuine political alternative. Like there is something else other than just voting for Liberal or Labour or maybe One Nation or the Greens, or something every four years. And that’s all politics is.

 

[28:48]

 

Blair Cottrell: I would like to see and contribute to, like manufacturing a popular counterculture from which we can siphon people. A counterculture that has working class Australians saying:

 

“Yeah, I’m a nationalist. Like, you got a problem with that? Fuck you!”

 

And the youth are saying:

 

“Yeah, I’m racist! Of course I’m racist. I’m not stupid!”

 

If we can create a counterculture like that, then people will say it’s kind of like, build it. And what do they say? If you build it, they will come. Yeah, yeah. So siphoning from a counterculture and helping, fostering, nurturing the growth of that kind of culture is the role I see myself playing personally.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. Well, the mission, the original mission statement for NSN, EAM has always been more of a community group focused on collating, collecting, and centralizing all the people that have this basic position. And that’s always been my main objective, is just:

 

“Okay, if you feel this way about the situation, let’s organise in real life.”

 

Because being on the Internet is not enough. And Jacob’s mission statement for NSN was, well, the first essay that he actually wrote and distributed through the NSN website, the original one before the jews had that one taken down, was about the nature of “metapolitics”, which is a word that gets thrown around a lot. Most people don’t understand it. But it’s about the idea that we need to make cultural changes or changes in the dialogue, changes in the dialectic, in the national conversation, if you want to call it that. There needs to be that change in how people perceive politics before this space, for political change. For actual political change, whether that’s Parliamentarian change or that’s change within the state apparatus. But there needs to be, first that culture shift. That needs to be. Yeah, I’ve already explained it. I won’t repeat it again, but that’s an important concept. You kind of have to go through a meta-political, grassroots focus.

 

Likewise with what I’ve always been focusing on. The strategy, not necessarily always, but since 2017, is about building loyalty at that grassroots level. What does grassroots nationalism look like to me? Well, it looks like loyal groups of men at a local level. And when all the loyal groups of men at a local level can meet up with each other, and then they can network with groups of men that aren’t necessarily local to them on a rare occasion, whether it’s once every month or once every three months or once a year, then you start to have some sort of political agency.

 

And this is why the jews have power. They don’t have power just because they have money. They have money because they have mobilisation and organisation power. Money is not the source of their power. Money is the medium of their power. Their power comes from their organisation. They organise together. They have synagogues.

 

Blair Cottrell: Their power comes from their racism, you might say.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, the power comes from their racism, which drives their mobilisation and organisation. Their racial consciousness, or their religious and racial consciousness breeds their, hyper selects, their organisational skills.

 

Blair Cottrell: And the most fundamental way that they can actually eliminate threats to their own community in that regard, or even ensure no one can challenge them, is to attack people in the most fundamental way, which is preventing other forms of racism from taking root.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like racism in different communities.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. If you can defeat racism in other groups, then you’re the dominant group.

 

And likewise, once you’ve defeated racism in other groups, then you can attack their ability to mobilise. So any group, like, of White people that are mobilising, but they’re not racist, well, then you can then enforce diversity quotas on them. You can say:

 

“Oh, you’re not racist. Well, how about you have some more refugees over here? And why aren’t you teaching the curriculum at your schools?”

 

Or, you know, any attempt you have at building parallel society without being explicit, is kind of like a temporary situation where you’re eventually going to meet your political, you’re going to hit a political brick wall, where, … A better way of putting it is you’re going to eventually meet your small Rubicon. You’re going to meet a, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You’ll hit an existential brick.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: Your whole existence will be cancelled out and changed.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. If you don’t cross that Rubicon, if you don’t go:

 

“Well, actually, this is the moment where our group are, …”

 

Whether it’s some sneaky project or not, at some point, you’re going to hit that Rubicon where it’s like you either cross the river and take back Rome, or you just, you stay forever on the other side, and you’re just attacked and attritioned into the abyss.

 

[33:42]

 

So I think it’s very important that, and I took some notes earlier, for people to really understand what strategy they should use, they should first assess what is going on with Western civilisation and what is going on with the White race. And the shortest way I can explain it is we’re going through a civilisational death, but death in itself is paired with life. It’s paired with rebirth. So death in itself, we can be black pilled about and we can say:

 

“Oh, it’s so sad that Western civilisation is collapsing.”

 

Or we can say:

 

“Well, hang on a minute. It’s lived its life cycle. It’s time for it to be reborn. Now, because it’s dying. It’s full of traitors, it’s full of cancer, it’s full of asbestos, it’s full of anything that’s basically attacking the healthy organs.”

 

And even though the organism is itself, the shell of the organism is dead, or at least very seriously dying, there are still healthy living parts within the cell.

 

And if you understand how a Venn diagram looks, my belief is that the cell needs to duplicate elsewhere. I don’t believe you can reform something that’s dead. You have to be revolutionary. You have to extract on a long enough timeline, you have to extract everything that is living, everything that is still healthy and beautiful and noble and upright. You have to extract that from the current civilisation and put it somewhere else, in a different space. It needs space. It needs distance. I call it authority through exclusion. Joel calls it the pathos of distance or space, but it needs to be separate, needs to be physically separate, culturally separate, even linguistically separate. It needs to be a completely separate entity. And eventually with separate borders as well, at a national level as a nation state.

 

And so this is not an immediate process. This civilisational mitosis, where it’s a single body like this, we’re all mixed into one and all atomized and alienated all in one. And for it to split into two different cells and we allow the other one to die on its own weight. It’ll fight of course, it’ll fight. It’ll have a, an attempt at dragging us down into hell with it, and we just have to not go down into hell with it. And if that means we have to fight it, then it means we have to.

 

Blair Cottrell: This has arguably happened organically with separation of certain groups from the motherland in England to America and Australia.

 

But as you said, there wasn’t an explicit enough understanding of a racial consciousness and identity, at least not a unified one, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, it’s happening also at a micro scale with White flight. Everyone’s already organically doing a it. And that’s important. You know, people overuse the statement, “I’ll lean into it”. What’s it, what does that look like? Okay, let’s lean into it. So we all just, we all just run away forever. We can’t do that forever, can we? But we do recognise that there is an energy where there’s healthy people within the system that are doing everything they can to kind of be slightly outside the system, and we have to continue to promote that culture.

 

And this is where the primary schism comes from between the two strategies, the reformists and the revolutionaries.

 

The reformists say, don’t do that! That’s downwards, backwards social mobility:

 

“Don’t do that! You should become a lawyer, you should get involved with the Liberal Party. Rah, rah, rah!”

 

And look, I’m sure there’s some talented people that can do that, and good on them and good luck with them. But on a long enough timeline, the Liberal Party is controlled, as Joel mentioned last show, by jews! It’s controlled by jewish money. And if we don’t mobilise and organise on explicitly racial lines, which means not reform, it means revolutionary strategy.

 

The only way for infiltration to work is actually just simply to support for people that exist within the system to support the mitosis. That’s really the only way infiltration will work, is to use their skills and their resources from within the decaying system to help rebuild the next system. And that takes a lot of money and takes a lot of skills and a lot of knowledge. And we don’t want to lose that knowledge. So it’s good that people are getting highly skilled jobs. It’s good that people are staying within the system, but their motivation for staying within the system should be to extract as much wealth and knowledge as they can and then let it die. Let it die and move across!

 

And the last point that I’ll finish on before I hand the mic back over is, why won’t the elites back us? Why won’t the elites back us? They’re never going to back us until the last minute! Because its grassroots!

 

Since World War Two, everything’s reset. And what Hitler went through is a microcosm of what the world is going through now. The first people to support Hitler were the working class, were the ex-soldiers, were the homeless, were the mentally ill veterans. Those are the first people that helped Hitler. The lowest people! Yes, there were some brains, there were some academics, there were some spokespeople, some Thule and Vril. You know, there was a little bit of esoteric. There was people that were doing this for some time and hadn’t made it with their politics because the time wasn’t right and they didn’t have someone like Hitler. So they backed him and they helped him.

 

So he had some good advisors in his corner. But ten advisors in your corner don’t make a movement. It’s thousands of men with the good energy, with good faith! And those are the first people he attracted. Then he won over the middle class, then he won over the upper middle class. And then right at the last minute, he started winning over intellectuals, philosophers, Professors at the university, judges, media people.

 

And eventually the old money! The old stock money. The people that own the steelworks, the people that own the coal. But this is all in the last year or two. The people that built the movement were working class and middle class people, in that order.

 

So what grassroots nationalism looks like globally, across the West, across all White countries, is it looks like World War Two is over. Allegedly. Hitler’s lost. Allegedly. And we’re back to square one.

 

And so who were the people that kept the fire lit from 1945 through to basically us? Who were the only people? There’s a few intellectuals. Of course, we can name ten or 15 intellectuals, but the people that kept the fire lit were fucking football hooligans, working class bogans, tatted up to the eyeball, skin heads, …

 

[39:58]

 

Blair Cottrell: People were most emotionally invested or with the capacity to be emotionally invested.

 

Thomas Sewell: But also it was the people that had the least to lose. And how Hitler took power was the people with the least to lose were like:

 

“Fuck it! Mask off. Let’s do it!”

 

And then eventually they built enough numbers of that they started moving up the social strata.

 

So this whole process of how we’re going to take power, the elites will join us when it’s in their interests, and then when they’ve got nothing left to lose! When the Marxists are at the door, when the communists are at the door, when they’re about to lose everything! And it’s basically us or lose everything, then all of a sudden we look really attractive, and they’re like:

 

“Actually, I’ve been sympathetic the whole time. Can have a party pin, please?”

 

And that’s what happens in the last twelve months before you take power.

 

So don’t expect any elites to back us anytime soon! We’ve got a long road ahead.

 

Joel Davis: It’s important. This, this is a point that for some reason, so many people can’t get through their fucking head! And it’s so simple. Which is that they think that we need to go to people that have a lot of money right now and get their money. Otherwise, we can’t build a political movement. In the example you just gave of the NSDAP, they got 80% of the way there just on like, the rank and file donations of their members. And that made them a serious and the biggest political party in Germany.

 

And then the big money started coming in right at the end. There’s a great book written by Henry Ashby Turner* called, I think it’s called The Rise of Adolf Hitler and Big Business, or something akin to that. And he details this. And he completely destroys in that book this Marxist nonsense, that National Socialism was funded by the capitalist elite to stop the communists or something. It’s just total bullshit! It’s not true historically. And I think, actually we should probably do a podcast on that book one day and go through it, because it’s a fantastic book, and I would like to reread it, and there’s a lot of really valuable stuff in it.

 

[* Henry Ashby Turner, Jr. Was an American historian of Germany who was a Professor at Yale University for over forty years. He is best known for his book German Big Business and the Rise of Hitler in which he challenged the common theory that industrialists in Germany were the Nazi Party’s most influential supporters. Wikipedia]

 

But putting that to one side. Just think about it like this. If you have 10,000 people, 10,000 Australians, and there’s 10,000 already White Australians that watch our streams and know who we are and follow us on social media, at least there’s more than 10,000. But you got 10,000. And they all put in $20 a week. Everyone can afford $20 a week. It’s fuck all! It’s like you go out to get a feed, and it costs more than that it’s nothing. You just have dinner at home one night instead of going out. And that’s basically $20 a week. That is $10 million a year. Just that.

 

There’s 100,000 Australians. There’s more than 100,000 Australians that are White nationalists, that have White nationalist opinions. If 100,000 White Australians put in $20 a week, which is fuck all, anyone, even if you’re on fucking Centrelink, you can put $20 a week in. That’s 100 grand a year. [$2,000,000] That’s enough to have a political campaign and compete for political power.

 

Like, I’d be interested to see how much money the Greens are pulling in. I reckon they probably would not even have our operational budget of $100 million a year. I reckon they probably pay less than that’s the third biggest political party in Australia, right?

 

So that’s just a hundred thousand people putting in $20 a week. It’s actually very feasible. There’s already 100,000 White nationalists in Australia, in my opinion. Like, at least! There’s more.

 

So the idea that you can’t build a political movement with the grassroots is just wrong. You can actually. If everyone chips in a little bit, it adds up very quickly. And you can compete with the big money, you can compete with the big property lobbyists and the business lobbyists and so on. And that’s a very measly sum. That’s a number I pulled out of my arse. And if you’ve got a political movement that’s already got that kind of money behind it, you can have a very sophisticated and professional outfit. And that’s going to attract the big money because it’s like:

 

“Okay, these guys are serious!”

 

So if we organise that first 10,000, and we work our way up to organising that first hundred thousand, and there are more than 100,000 White Australians that are ready to hear our message. There’s millions of White Australians that want to hear our message. If we organise just a fraction of them and get them organised and paying into the same pot, organised under the same leadership we can become one of the one of the big forces in Australian politics and start throwing our weight around in a serious way. It actually isn’t, like that complicated. It actually isn’t that crazy to think.

 

So people need to understand there is a lot of power and value in the grassroots, in that five to 10% of Aussies that are already basically ready to receive our message in almost its entirety. If we just focus on getting those guys organised, reaching those guys, getting them to show up to events, getting them to pay money into the same pot, getting them to respect one set of leaders and professionalise our output. We build a parallel economy to support our top activists, to withstand attacks from the system, and we make ourselves presentable. We have good propaganda. We ensure that we’re part of the conversation. Our message will sell itself. We’ve got a great message. There’s millions of White Australians ready to hear our message. And if you have a serious political movement putting our message forward, they will get behind it, they will back it.

 

So to me, it’s actually not that complicated. We don’t need magic billionaires to come in and save us. We don’t!

 

[45:39]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, there’s enough working class people with the resources. I mean, all you need is those weekly or monthly dues and you have enough members, enough card carrying members. They don’t have to be like, active physical participants, card carrying, paying members. Then you’ll have all the resources you need to grow that parallel community, I suppose.

 

Joel Davis: That’s the other thing as well about de-platforming. If you register as an official political party, you get there’s a whole bunch of protections, like legal protections that you get that prevent you from being de-platformed in, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Same as if you register as a religious group too, which is something that I’ve always argued would be beneficial for any Right-wing or nationalistic community group.

 

Joel Davis: And also there’s like, if you make a formal group, there’s like transparency and so on. The point is that there’s legal Avenues to set up a proper White nationalist outfit in this country. I don’t think almost anyone really has the political will to get the men in the room and get the people together, except us and our associates. I don’t see anyone else in Australia that putting a serious effort towards it.

 

So if you’re a serious White nationalist movement, either go and build something better than what we’re doing and show us how it’s done. And if you, if your shit takes off, well, we’ll go:

 

“All right! We’ll fucking come along and we’ll fucking put our guys and we’ll come along and do your thing.”

 

If you can do something that will work better than us, prove it! Make it, prove it and we’ll back you. Even if you do something that is worse than us, we’ll still give you some fucking support, because that’s how we just care about the movement.

 

There’s other organisations in the movement that we give one sided support to, and we don’t get a lot of support back, because we just want to see everything work. We want to see the movement grow. We actually just care about saving White people more than anything.

 

But we’re the guys that can get an actual serious amount of men together in this country over the next few years. If the people that are already following us and know who we are want to get behind it and give us their support, we can fucking do it! It’s just about the willpower, the determination.

 

The reason why the jews are winning. I posted about this on Twitter. One of the main reasons why they’re winning is very simple! It’s because jews put their money in to pro-jewish organisations. There’s all these jewish activist groups and jewish lobbyist groups and shit! The jews chip in! And yeah, there are some wealthy jews that put in serious dollars, but the jews put their money into pro-jewish organisations.

 

And so there’s all these big, powerful pro-jewish organisations that throw their weight around in politics and throw their weight around in the media. And the jews get what they want, nine times out of ten! We don’t do that. White Australians will do that. No White group does that.

 

And so we don’t ever fucking get what we want! It’s like, it’s very simple and there’s more to it than that. But it is a very large, basic component, White people are too fucking individualistic! Like, I made a tweet about this yesterday and this guy came back like:

 

“Oh, Joel, why don’t you go and start your own business and make the money yourself? Why are you e-begging?”

 

And I wasn’t even e-begging. I wasn’t requesting donations.

 

We need to get our act together, our organisation. We don’t even have things set up for anyone to fucking donate to us. We only take dues from our own members. We probably need to fix that.

 

We need to get better at that kind of thing. We don’t because we’ve got this culture of this anti-grifting culture, anti-money culture, this hyper individualistic White culture. We need to fucking get over that! ! We need to start putting our money together and building collective power.

 

Because if I go, all right, I’m going to go and start my own business. He’s like:

 

“Joel, you’re a smart guy. If you started your own business, you would be cancel-proof. You’d make all this money!”

 

Okay, I’ll go put fucking 70, 80 hours a week into starting my own business. And then there goes one of the only, like, four White nationalist political activists in this whole country that anyone knows who they are.

 

[49:51]

 

Blair Cottrell: You just end up working for the man to pay tax!

 

Joel Davis: Like, is that what you really want? We have, like, four. Okay, maybe there’s a few others. Like, I guess we could say five. I can name a few more. But there’s a small group of us that are the only, like, White nationalist political activists that from Australia that anyone even fucking knows who they are!

 

So do you really want us, … You know, would you want us building the fucking movement, or do you want us, like, what? Like, at some point you’re gonna have to fucking give us some fucking money! Not so that we can go and pay off our mortgage and live it up, but so that we can pay for the fucking movement! It’s gonna cost a lot of money for us to fucking get this shit together. So at some point, like, if you don’t trust us, that’s fine. I said in my tweet:

 

“Support someone.”

 

And I was talking internationally, there’s groups in other countries to support as well, if you’re from other countries.

 

But if you don’t want to support us, go find someone else to support them. But we’re going to have to put our money fucking somewhere. And you go and join them to give your manpower, give your hours, give your time. If we don’t put our money and our fucking time and our effort into the White nationalist movement in some fucking capacity, it won’t fucking exist!

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, everyone subscribes, Joel. Everyone’s ready to subscribe to Netflix and Audible and Spotify. And they pay that subscription. It’s like, what? Some of them are $7 a month, some are $14 a month. Why not subscribe to White Australia? Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, that’s all stuff that I’m working on the moment. So as I’ve said before in the past, we’re looking at streamlining everything, the whole operation. And what we’re looking at doing is integrating more of a supporter class of our movement.

 

So obviously, our expectations for people being involved is very high. And what I’m talking to the state leaders about is developing an apparatus that people can be involved. It’s actually quite interesting. I got a message, sadly, just as the stream was about to start from one of our new members, new recruits that’s looking to get involved. Who’s saying he can’t really be involved anymore. I just skimmed. I said:

 

“I’ll answer this question after the stream.”

 

But out of the last maybe 20 guys we recruited, one guy’s messaged me saying:

 

“Hey, look, it’s a big time commitment.”

 

Which it’s not, but I’ll address that later. Unless he’s watching, then he will understand it’s not a big time commitment. We’re not asking for much. But he’s saying that he doesn’t really want to engage in the activism and the training. He’d rather just donate a lump sum of money every month, more than what he’s already paying in dues, the $50. So I’ll address that with him when I get off the show.

 

But that is interesting timing, because that is actually something that we’ve been in discussions about in the last couple of months, and especially in the last couple of weeks, about how do we go about building that apparatus. So it’s still in a planning phase. I can almost guarantee by the end of the year, we will be in a situation where there will be a clear cut pathway.

 

What I need to do first is register as either an incorporated society or as an ethno-religious group. I need to register things on paper. Because the issue that we’re going to have when we start taking a lot of money, because we’ve done fundraisers in the past, and what the government’s trying to do is its trying to claim that that money is personal income.

 

So all the fundraisers that we’ve done, they don’t just shut down your bank accounts, they’re trying to asphyxiate you everywhere with everything! So we’ve raised a little bit of money from time to time, especially for things like legal fees. If we’re starting to take in massive amounts of money, like we recently raised 16 grand on GiveSendGo for the deposit on the farm that we’re trying to get. And that money was all refunded to everyone, and everyone’s really upset about that.

 

But look, when we put the fundraiser back up, I’m sure it will fast pass $16,000 when it goes back up. But where does that money go when that 16 grand is cashed out from the website? If it goes to my personal bank account, the government’s going to take probably close to half of it. So I need to set up the infrastructure to have everything above board and legal so that we can then start taking in. Because 16 grand is nothing as I was saying before, and as Joel was saying, you know,

 

Blair Cottrell: Was that GiveSendGo Tom? Was that GiveSendGo that actually refunded everyone’s money?

 

Thomas Sewell: That was GiveSendGo. And it was under pressure from the Australian government. So it happened at the same time that it was raised in the Senate inquiry.

 

So at the Senate inquiry, some fucking communists were saying:

 

“How come there’s American websites, you know, raising money for this terrorist organisation, NSN, you know, rah, rah, rah. Why is this happening? Why isn’t the government doing something about it?”

 

And the government obviously wrote letters pressuring GiveSendGo to be like:

 

“Hey, can you refund this money to everyone? Like, we don’t want it going to this group. This group is obviously like a national security risk to faggot brown Australia.”

 

Because I think the GiveSendGo just said, like:

 

“Fundraiser for the White Australian community to have a property.”

 

Like, to have a home. We don’t have a home. Most of us are renting or we have mortgages in the city. We don’t really have living space for an Org to really, truly grow and take off, for an Org to grow and take off, it needs a physical home that its members or its leaders aren’t indebted to trying to pay off all the time.

 

[54:56]

 

So if we’re all at work, you know, 40 hours a week plus, to try to pay off a building like a headquarters, or a house for us to operate out of, not just a personal home, but a home for the Org, then how can the leaders then have the freedom, like the physical freedom, the time, the free time, to then push the movement into the next stage? It’s just not possible. We just stagnate at this level where it’s like one podcast a week, and it’s like we get a little bit of work done or we do some activism and we organise the manpower, we vet new members, and we slowly grow. But to really unlock the next stage, which is where we’re heading. The amount of recruitment we’re getting, we’re going to need people working full-time on this. And it can’t just be funded purely from the in-house. And there are a lot of people willing to donate and that’s awesome and be supporters.

 

So what I’m looking at doing is setting up an apparatus so that we have a governing organisation, and then that governing organisation is legally registered within the system so that it is protected. And I saw some smartass in the comments say just then, not just then, but like five minutes ago:

 

“Why would you be doing all this, if the civilisation is dead?”

 

These people are just so frustrating and annoying. Something dies over hundreds of years. So this idea that we can’t operate a little bit in the system in order to not get fucking Wacoed*, or not get fucking $100,000 tax Bill! Like this is just like splitting hairs. Analysis paralysis. These are just the worst kinds of fucking political commentators!

 

[* The Waco siege, also known as the Waco massacre, was the siege by U.S. Federal government and Texas state law enforcement officials of a compound belonging to the religious cult known as the Branch Davidians, between February 28 and April 19, 1993. The Branch Davidians, led by David Koresh, were headquartered at Mount Carmel Center ranch in unincorporated McLennan County, Texas, 13 miles (21 kilometers) northeast of Waco. Suspecting the group of stockpiling illegal weapons, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) obtained a search warrant for the compound and arrest warrants for Koresh and several of the group’s members. After 51 days, on April 19, 1993, the FBI launched a tear gas attack in an attempt to force the Branch Davidians out of the compound’s buildings. Shortly thereafter, the Mount Carmel Center became engulfed in flames. The fire and the reaction to the final attack within the group resulted in the deaths of 76 Branch Davidians, including 20–28 children and David Koresh. In total, the 51-day siege resulted in the deaths of four federal agents and 82 Branch Davidians, somewhere between 20 and, 208 of whom were children.]

 

And I try to ignore it, but they just kept commenting. Pain in the ass, to be honest, because these people are fucking do-nothings! This person will never do anything. They just sit on the Internet and be like:

 

“Oh, but you’re not doing this exactly correct!”

 

It’s like, fuck you! Shut your fucking mouth! Didn’t ask for your opinion. Pain in the arse!

 

Like, we’ve dedicated ten years to this, and I dedicate probably 30 or 40 hours a week, on top of my day job to this. And then you’ve got these fucking wankers that think their opinion is just as valid as you because they can nitpick something at you. No, we’re not a democracy. That’s not how it works. Get your feet in the movement. Actually get your foot in the door, and let’s have the conversation in person. But you won’t do that, will you? Just a piece of shit on the Internet.

 

So, as I was saying, more importantly, we set up the apparatus, and what we’re going to do is set up a supporters class. And so we have activists, we have a leadership team, we have activists, and we have a pool of associates. We have people that they’ve kind of dipped their toes in. They’ve come and trained a little bit or done a little bit of activism, but they don’t really want to commit to the once a month thing.

 

So what we’re trying to do is work out a class within the organisation that isn’t necessarily going to attend once a month, but maybe we might see them once or twice a year, and they can engage with the movement when they feel like it at those bigger events on the condition that they’re a financial supporter. And I think that’s a fair equilibrium of forces.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that would be another good thing as well. When we get some property. The reason why we want to do that, is because it’s just a cheaper option for us to all homestead on it and so on, rather than individually, you know, working out our arrangements. We want to be within, like, on the periphery of the city, like, attack distance of the city. But the objective then, if we can build a large community, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, [chuckling] I can think of a better term to use!

 

But yeah.

 

Joel Davis: But if we build like a large community, …

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re still politically relevant, we’re not just like hiding out. Obviously long term, we do want to do that. Long term, we do want to build something ages away with a huge amount of people, but for the amount of people we have at the moment, it’s better for us to stay connected to the city. I don’t think we need to build, …

 

[58:52]

 

Joel Davis: The city is the main, like, we’re building chapters in the rural areas, which is fantastic! And we’re getting a lot of good recruits from those areas. And there’s a lot of good stock, high quality White men that live in rural areas that are switched on and that are going to be great assets to the movement.

 

So we don’t want to be just a city movement. But the cities, there’s a large concentration of people, a lot of disaffected young White men dealing with the perils of diversity, that we want to bring in. That’s why we want to have our gyms and things like that. I’ve floated the idea it would be nice to buy some pubs in the cities and have, like, White nationalist pubs where we’ve got, like, our guys doing the DJing or our guys playing in bands and our guys at the security, and we got a bunch of Aryan babes behind the, pouring drinks and a place for the young White men to hang out. Community hubs for young White people in general. Because it’s important to build that community structure for the activist corp and to keep replenishing the activist corps with more and more recruits.

 

And then as they go up in the life cycle and they get ready to settle down and have kids, well, then if we have, like, peripheral rural areas, they can homestead on, where they can live a lifestyle that is like, somewhat de ZOGified. Some food is being generated on the farm, so they’re not eating just pure ZOG slop. They’re not gonna have to pay a giant jew mortgage, and they can home-school their kids in an environment with lots of young pro-White families with shared values. And the kids can grow up with other good stock, good families, you know, that are trusted and so on. So, like, that’s a very attractive arrangement for a life cycle to keep them within the movement.

 

But then also, if we build a big community centre on these, then we can have our conferences. We don’t have to go and rent some place out and they can do venue cancellations and shit like that! We can do it on our own property, we can manage our own security, so we can make it a very secure event and it can go as long as we want and we don’t have to pay extra to rent it out or they cancel it the last minute or the police show up and try and shut it down or any of this nonsense that you can deal with trying to organise big nationalist events. And that’s very important, to have these big events where we can have speeches and we can have big meetings and so on in the major cities.

 

So that’s part of the vision as well. Because a lot of people say, like:

 

“What’s the vision? You know, you just kind of marching around on the street and putting up stickers.”

 

And it’s well, that’s really, …

 

Thomas Sewell: It could be a social media issue. I think if they’ve only seen us on Twitter in recent time, then they think that’s all we do. I don’t really see that from the community on Telegram. Everyone on Telegram knows that we have this back end of our organisation, that we’re trying to build homesteads, that we’re trying to build living space for White people, we’re trying to build parallel institutions. We’ve been talking about this stuff for four or five years. That’s stuff that we’ve been working on. We’ve got a “mums and bubs” crew or club. The women are helping each other with an in-house daycare, lending each other help and services and stuff like that. We’ve got a huge back end community that we’ve built.

 

So, yeah, I only see that really on Twitter where people are like:

 

“Oh, but what’s actually the plan, guys? Where’s the money going, guys?”

 

And it’s like, we’ve explained it like 500 times, but we can explain it again. I’m happy to explain it again. Like, you know, gyms aren’t free! To set up a gym. It’s not free to set up any sort of business, or a studio to do this podcast professionally. If we professionalise something like this, the audience will become larger, the clips will become more mainstream. It just builds a gravity around it because it’s not like three dudes in their studies or spare bedrooms talking on kind of crappy webcams. So stuff like:

 

“Where’s the money going? Or where’s the money going to go?”

 

It’s well, it’s going to go everywhere. The more money there is, the more institutional power we can build that’s explicitly White nationalist.

 

And again, as I said, we’ve always started and centreed our two primary focus, or our three primary focuses would be the physical training element of it. We are an active club. That’s a big part of what we do, and it’s what’s held our community together for this long, is providing that as a service, like trying to maintain a masculine and health and fitness focus for young men. We’ve got the community model as well, the community building, so setting up kind of like little homesteads and having living space for people, because it’s unaffordable for most people to live in the major cities, and that’s where all the work is so we want to be able to work out a community solution to that problem.

 

And thirdly, we need propaganda. Not in any specific order. It’s not like that’s the third most important thing. That’s probably one of the most important things, but they’re all equally important. We need a home, we need a tribe. Tribe and train. And we need propaganda. We need stronger and better propaganda efforts. And we need to hire services as well. Like, none of this stuff is free. Once you’ve got a website, we’ve got a website up and running. It’s nothing flashy, but with more money, we can get a better website up and running, we can get better social media. We can have a social media manager, someone that works full-time doing that.

 

I mean, most people just go to work and they just work for ZOG, or they work for some subcontract of ZOG, or they work for some big corporation that’s a subcontractor of ZOG. And then it’s well, for nationalism to work, we need people that are working full-time doing nationalism. And you’ve got groups like the NJP, National Justice Party in America. I mean, they had like six guys. Say again, …

 

Joel Davis: They’re defunct now. They no longer exist.

 

[1:04:42]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I know.

 

But what I’m saying is that these guys, they raised millions of dollars over the years. They paid off a whole bunch of their own mortgages, and then they just sort of, … I can understand the hesitation to support people like the three of us or the project that we’re building, because groups in the past, that’s how they behaved.

 

But I think if you look at the physionomy*. Do a physionomy check on the NJP guys and, …

 

[* Physiognomy or face reading is the practice of assessing a person’s character or personality from their outer appearance—especially the face. The term can also refer to the general appearance of a person, object, or terrain without reference to its implied characteristics—as in the physiognomy of an individual plant or of a plant community. Wikipedia]

 

Joel Davis: If we pick up a formal organisation, there’s ways to have transparency where like everything is recorded and accounted for. Like, if you become a member, like that gives you like rights to kind of, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, that would only be something for members, like people that are just spectating on the Internet. You don’t get to decide where the money goes.

 

Joel Davis: Exactly! The people who are supporters, there will be transparency for them.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, yeah. And there always has been in our organisation, everyone that’s been in our organisation, obviously that I saw someone in the comments, some other smarter saying:

 

“Oh, but someone stolen from you in the past.”

 

Well, again, that was not from a lack of transparency. That was just one, you know, disgusting little creature that was grifting on the internet and, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That was just from, that was excess Greekery! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, yeah. That individual, … They didn’t like physically steal money out of my bank account or out of the like, coffers of the Org. What they did was they had their own parallel social media and they used their parallel social media platform to extract money out of people in the wider community, pretending that they were raising money on my behalf.

 

Blair Cottrell: And there’s the lesson.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s literally illegal.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s a threshold of Greekery that can be tolerated, but then you can’t go above that threshold or it just becomes dangerous and someone gets robbed. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: He was so Greek, he became jewish.

 

Thomas Sewell: If finances are centralised. But what my frustration with that whole situation was at the time that that was going on, we had three official fundraisers. We had a crypto fundraiser, a Monaro crypto fundraiser that was on our Telegram page. We had a GiveSendGo, and I have a PO Box if you want to send cash or books or gifts or whatever.

 

So we had three official fundraisers that were put up on all the official pages. That were put up on my page, all the other spokespeople of the Org’s page. But people were still sending money to the personal bank account of someone they knew was a member of our Org, on the basis that they were a member of the Org. But there was three official, …

 

So to me it’s, yeah, he’s a piece of shit for doing that. But also it’s pretty naive and stupid to be doing that was never, that was never publicly:

 

“Oh, by the way, if you want to donate money to the, pay it to this random member of our organisation.”

 

If any random member of our organisation messages you on social media saying:

 

“Hey, I’m raising money for the Org!”

 

I guarantee you they’re not! And report it to someone within the Org, that’s not that person, straight away! And we’ll fucking remove them on the spot! Because, yeah, it’ll never happen again.

 

Joel Davis: We weren’t defrauded. We weren’t stolen from. Like, technically it was stolen because it was money that people intended to give to the organisation. And so it was theft in that sense.

 

But really what it was fraud. It wasn’t direct theft.

 

So it wasn’t like:

 

“Oh, we don’t control our own money and we’re leaving the cash box in the hands of some scumbag. And what retards we are!”

 

It was like someone going around, sneaking around, presenting himself as a representative of the Org, soliciting donations.

 

So when people attacked us for that, it was like, if somebody had reported that to us earlier, that wouldn’t have happened. So, like we didn’t know that it was going on.

 

There’s a bunch of I think they’re like, pajeets. Maybe they’re Nigerians, but they’re probably pajeets on my Telegram. They’ll go into my Telegram chat, and then they’ll DM, they’ll create a fake account with my profile picture called Joel Davis, but it’ll be slightly different. And they’ll DM people and try and, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Instead of the “l” in Joel, it’s a capital “I” so, yeah, “JoeI Davis” Yeah, I’ve had them message me all the time.

 

Blair Cottrell: It just almost got me. Almost got me once. Like, my heart skipped a beat because I got a message from JoeI Davis just saying:

 

“Fuck you!”

 

And I was like, “what?”, that’s not the real Joel. Thank God! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, no!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but the point is that people come in:

 

“Surely this isn’t you, Joel?”

 

And it’s like, obviously it’s not me. You know? Like, why do you even, like, come in and alert. Like, there’s been about literally 2,000 people that have come into the chat. Like:

 

“Is this Joel? I don’t know if it’s Joel or not.”

 

And everyone’s like:

 

“No. For the 3,000,000th time!”

 

People need to use a little bit of discretion. You know when something’s obviously bullshit! But at the same time, like, it’s not my responsibility. What am I supposed to do about that? If you have an open Telegram chat and that happens? Like, I don’t actually know what I can do about that.

 

So it is what it is. I would have to have, like, no open Telegram chat would be the alternative, and people would get very upset by that.

 

So, yeah, I don’t think anyone has been dumb enough to fall for the scam. If you have, shame on you!

 

[1:10:07]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: We’ve got so many ideas in the chat, I think we should change the subject. Or maybe we should address some of these ideas. Look, I’ll just do a blanket statement on ideas then. If you haven’t heard the rant already, we don’t need any more ideas. Okay? There’s a lot of people giving us ideas in the chat. We have all the ideas. We have all of them! We have at least 99% of all the ideas. We’re actually overloading with ideas.

 

Blair Cottrell: We have as many ideas as we have wholesome grandmas.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, [chuckling] exactly! And what we need is men to implement these ideas.

 

So I have a rule in the organisation, when someone comes to me with an idea, I say:

 

“When are you starting?”

 

That is the rule! Because I have been doing this for so long now, and I have so many people come to me with an idea. All I say is:

 

“When are you starting?”

 

Because I used to be like:

 

“Wow, that’s a great idea. Let’s sit down and let’s discuss this idea and let’s work out this idea!”

 

It’s like, no, I’ve already got, like, 50 things on my plate. And when some guy in the chat said:

 

“We should really capitalise on the housing crisis!”

 

Like, [chuckling] we’re not doing that?

 

Blair Cottrell: I love Jacob’s perspective. Jacob says:

 

“Prove your worth first!”

 

Jacob says:

 

“Fight for the ideology! Sacrifice, take blows, and then still stand with us after years of that, then I’ll hear what you have to say.”

 

I like that.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. We should be capitalizing on the housing crisis and spread propaganda and truth, how it’s caused by browns that will make the average Australian tick. It’s like, we just went to Bendigo and, well, we do the show every week and we talk about it every week. We post about it on Telegram and Twitter every week1

 

And also we’re doing in real life, rallies about mass deportations, doing speeches about how it’s causing us issues. And we don’t want these people in the country.

 

And on top of that, if that’s not enough, we also went to Bendigo just last weekend and handed out thousands, if not tens of thousands of flyers to all the people in Bendigo about how crime and housing is a problem, …

 

Blair Cottrell: How did that go, by the way? How did the people receive you?

 

Thomas Sewell: We talked about that last stream, didn’t we?

 

But, yeah, I can repeat it. It was good. It was awesome!

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know if we did discuss it on the stream last week, I think.

 

Blair Cottrell: I can’t remember covering it.

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, it was actually really good! We’re all in NSN jackets. I wasn’t. I decided to be different because I’m me.

 

So I just had a different black jacket. I didn’t really think, … But everyone was in NSN jackets, and we had the EAM shirts on. We had these flyers that said “Whiteman Fight Back” on them. And we were going around handing them out to people. And I noticed a few things. One is that all the cutie girls took the flyer! They were like:

 

“Oh, yeah. Hey, thanks. Yeah, have a good day!”

 

Thomas Sewell: And the Zoommer boys.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the Zoomer boys. And then the more like Chad Dads and the boomer, the White boommer! Like, all the boomers are White, but like, the boomer granddads and the Chad Dads.

 

Thomas Sewell: And the gracious grandmas. Don’t forget the racist grandmas.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, they were all into it.

 

But then when it was like, the fat dads, the soy dads, they weren’t about it.

 

And then the soy male, like, left hard physiognomy, they were like:

 

“Oh, no, no, thanks!”

 

But physiognomy is very real. Just in that interaction, the ugly girls suck. Ugly girls, I’m changing from before, people accuse me of being a misogynist. Now I’m basically, what I am is I’m pro-hot chicks! And I’m anti-ugly chicks! I’m adapting. I think actually hot chicks are awesome! And it’s just the only problem is the ugly chicks. That’s my new view on women.

 

So you can debate that in the chat. Because I have noticed this time and time and time again, that hot chicks are so much more chill about racism, and ugly chicks are the only chicks that are really getting that offended by it. I’ve had countless experiences like this. So be that what it is.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why is that?

 

Thomas Sewell: Empathy.

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know about the short answer. I don’t know if I can do short answers on questions like this, Blair. I guess maybe the short answer is this. Hot chicks do well in a society run by White men. Ugly chicks don’t do as well! Because all the White chads that run the society want to marry and bang all the hot chicks, or the White cuties and buy them nice houses and give them a nice life.

 

And then the ugly chicks are just kind of stuck with all the duds. Whereas, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Attractive women already have value and they don’t need to pander to things.

 

And so, like, less attractive women, they need to represent some sort of social justice value in order to seem valuable or useful to society.

 

Thomas Sewell: Attractive women find pity, disgusting! Attractive women hate pity! They find pity disgusting! So social justice doesn’t work.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s true. They won’t openly admit it. But yeah, women are kind of geared to despise weakness.

 

[1:15:19]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, attractive women. But unattractive women, they make a compromise with pity. They actually don’t have a negative relationship with pity. They’re okay with pity as a concept because they have insecurities. They actually want people to be okay with their issues and they pity themselves. So it’s a flow on effect.

 

So race mixing women, the majority of race mixing women do it out of low self esteem. That’s why they’re anti-racist. Because they’re actually worried that maybe they won’t get a nice boyfriend. They might not get a nice husband if they’re racist. Because they’re insecure about some genetic issue that they have. They always have a genetic issue. They might look semi-healthy on the surface but when you dive into it, there’s some serious genetic issue. Or at least an issue that flares up. It’s an issue that maybe flares up because of the toxic environment we’re living in. So it’s a cycle of poverty where they might have genes that are prone to, …

 

I’ll give you an example. I was at the shopping centre recently and there was a White girl. She was kind of average looking at best, with an Indian boyfriend. And they were at McDonald’s. Not Indian, but I don’t know, West Indies or something, he was brown but not black, but not Indian. Just some mulatto, right?

 

Blair Cottrell: What was wrong with the girl?

 

Thomas Sewell: She had really bad eczema. I had to walk past her and really sort of evaluate her. But she had really bad eczema. Really bad eczema. So she’s very insecure. She feels pity on herself. And so she’s not going to be prone to racism because she has some issues, some serious issue that she’s insecure about. She hasn’t worked out how to address it by changing her diet and exercise or environment. She might need to live in a different country or different region within a country. There’s something, you shouldn’t have, horrible eczema. That’s just you’re obviously doing something wrong. Right. If you’ve got a skin condition like that, move, live somewhere different where the climate’s different so your skin adapts to the better environment.

 

Blair Cottrell: Could be bad karma?

 

Thomas Sewell: It could be bad karma as well. Yeah, certainly.

 

But I think there are also just material reasons for it as well and I explain them. But what they do instead with a lot of these mental illnesses is they cope and say:

 

“Well, I’m accepting!”

 

Because if they’re accepting of other races, then other races are accepting of their bad genetic structure.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: They’re more likely to be obese. They’re more likely to be low IQ. This is a fact. These are the statistics of women that race mix. They’re obese, they’re low IQ, they have genetic conditions, so they have organ issues, for example. They usually don’t finish high school. They usually become single moms.

 

Blair Cottrell: But even these women who have all of these genetic weaknesses, would it ethnically, racially, would they still stand higher than the people they choose to mix with? Or are we like casting off our genetic impurities and just spreading them amongst other races? So for that reason, …

 

Thomas Sewell: The trash is taking itself out. Civilisational mitosis is the final red pill. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Also, that’s true about homosexuality and feminism and like, Leftists are disproportionately dysgenic. They’ve got all these kinds of genetic issues that predict for Leftism. Like, they basically have high mutational load and all these indicators correlate with that. And at the same time, they engage in a whole series of behaviours that are less fertile.

 

So they’re going to not pass down as much of their mutant genes, but the more Right-wing, conservative, patriotic, healthy Whites breed more.

 

So there’s a lot of these trends that are, yeah, the trash taking itself out is occurring. But the problem with that is that when you do miscegenation, you create these spiteful, mutant offspring that are going to be hostile towards the kind of politics that we want to put forward because ultimately they’re excluded from it. So they’re just creating enemies. They’re creating enemies. On that’s why I can’t be tolerated to the fullest extent possible.

 

But anyway, on the kind of ugly girl question, we live in a society where there are all of these artificial privileges and statuses that are assigned not on the basis of your inherent quality, your inherent health and vitality and value as a human being, but on the basis of your conformity to systems which ultimately have basically the function of destroying the White race and upending natural hierarchies and subverting natural hierarchies, blocking the vile, the healthy, the good, from taking over society. Because there’s this coalition of resentful mutants and racial aliens and so on that are ruling over us. So they’re doing a lot better.

 

It’s the same thing with, like whenever you see the communists organise an event, there isn’t one, Chad. There’s no one Giga Chad, communist. That doesn’t exist. There isn’t one! They’re all fucking ugly, soy, low test, pathetic losers, every single one of them!

 

And that’s why. Because if you’re an ugly, pathetic loser, you’re not going to do very well under fascism. Whereas, like, they’re able to kind of get a discount and gain social prestige and status and so on by signaling, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Only the weak argue for equality. Huh?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, the inferior.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! And there’s actually been a study on this, by the way, that they rated women by attractiveness. They got a whole bunch of men to rate, like, what is she, out of ten? And then collated the scores, and then they tested the women for political belief. And the hotter chicks were the most Right-wing. And the lower down the score, the more Left-wing they became.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

[1:21:17]

 

Joel Davis: So that’s scientific fact!

 

So what we’re saying here isn’t just cope like:

 

“Oh, you’re saying all the hot chicks are more predisposed to being Right-wing?”

 

No, it’s just actually a scientific fact.

 

Blair Cottrell: Curious segue. But I suppose what I was interested in, because I’ve got some political history, and Bendigo, close to my heart is Bendigo. And I was disappointed that I didn’t find the time to make it up there, to be honest. I wanted to go with you guys, but had to do some extra work. But my question, I suppose what I want to know is, what was the vibe like, Tom? Was there a similar feeling that used to be there years ago? Has it changed much? What was the vibe?

 

Thomas Sewell: I only encountered, or we only encountered, maybe a dozen men that were probably the young guys that were at the rally.

 

So most of the young guys we ran into were too young. They wouldn’t have been there. They would have been preteen, because it was so long ago. I mean, it was 2016, so it’s eight years ago, which is pretty scary to think about. But we ran into about a dozen men, in their thirties or really late twenties, and they might not have recognised. They probably would have recognised you. I don’t think they recognised me because I was kind of like a second or third speaker.

 

Blair Cottrell: You also missed out. You didn’t come to the first big rally there. You only came to the second. And just so the audience is aware, Bendigo was kind of a big datum point for Sewell and I in our, how should I describe it? In the way that we first came onto the scene through activism, and we generated a great deal of support through Bendigo. So that really put us on the map. That’s why Bendigo is kind of significant to us. It’s a historic Australian town. A lot of great culture there. But, yeah, the vibe?

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s centreed around., … To also give some back note to the audience, it centreed around an organic protest that evolved in Bendigo against a mosque being built. Because there was only on the census, I think, 16 or 17 Muslims in a town of 110,000 or 150,000. There was only 16 Muslims on the census.

 

Blair Cottrell: They were trying to build the largest mosque in the southern hemisphere there.

 

Thomas Sewell: In Australia, because there’s a bigger one in Indonesia. But they were trying to build a mega mosque, like, for 10,000 plus people in a town with 16 Muslims. And there was no transparency with the public! There was no transparency with the people of Bendigo. And these organic little groups were forming, but they had no real strong leadership. And Blair was organising the UPF [United Patriots Front] and primarily out of Melbourne, and we were doing rallies against far-Left treason and against the Islamisation of Australia. That’s what our, you know, it was a pro-Australian, anti-Islam and anti-traitor position.

 

And I wouldn’t have called us civn ats, but we certainly weren’t., … Were playing an optics game. We didn’t want to go full White nationalism. We didn’t think that people were ready for that. We wanted to focus on being pro-Australian, working class, and anti-Islam, and obviously anti-traitor as well, the Left.

 

Now, we went up there in support and tried to basically get all these little groups of people together. There was these kind of organic protests that were forming, and we had some huge turnouts. I think our biggest rally was maybe two and a half thousand people. We completely dwarfed the counter-protesters, and it was just all organic. No money, no media support, no nothing! Whereas they had everything. They had all the system behind them, and they could only, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It scared the shit out of the government, too. Scared the shit out of the government! We had big marches through the streets. Half the town was basically shut down, and we ended up gathering in a park just to actually keep the mass of people that we had acquired away from the centre of town to prevent disruption of businesses. That’s how big our rallies were there back in these days.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. So in saying that, there was a huge organic support from the public, and I think people still remember that, even if they don’t remember me personally, they remember that energy. I don’t think that disappears.

 

It’s like Cronulla. Everyone remembers Cronulla*. Even if you don’t remember the leaders or the individuals, there’s an energy, there’s an anonymity of the message, of the symbol of what that was. And those people are still in Bendigo. And the greatest support we got, because the Zoomers aren’t very serious. They’re all irony bros. They’re a strange generation. They’re not politically mature enough to really understand what’s going on, but they agree with it and support it, I think, at a subconscious level.

 

[* The 2005 Cronulla riots were a series of race riots in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. It began in the beachside suburb of Cronulla on 11 December, and spread over to additional suburbs the next few nights. The riots were triggered by an event the previous Sunday, when an altercation turned physical between a group of youths of Middle Eastern appearance (Lebos) and White Australian lifeguards on the beach. Wikipedia]

 

So with Zoomers, you’re kind of always tapping into the subconscious. There’s not really much of a conscious political conversation you can have with them. They, like, they just kind of FED post and say kind of ironic things and speak in their kind of mumble, mumble language. But the guys around our age, Blair, they remember, like, they were with quiet voices they came in close and they said:

 

“It’s getting out of control. The Whiteman’s got to fight back. Love what you guys are doing. This is awesome stuff!”

 

And a couple of them that I spoke to, they were there. They were present at the rallies. But the biggest support we got, and I know it’s a bit cliche, the biggest support we got and the biggest vibe that we had, or the general vibe, was actually from the Boomers, and which was surprising. I was actually shocked, genuinely shocked. The Boomers were the most supportive people. The Boomers and the Zoomers. The Boomers and the Zoomers!

 

[1:26:47]

 

Blair Cottrell: For different reasons. Like, it’s probably a genuine racism in the Boomers, but like you said, the Zoomer is more ironic.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Basically every single grandma, except the refugee grandmas. So there’s two types of grandmas, obviously, as I’ve explained on the show. But the fizz was incredible because we’re doing in real life activism, and we’re talking to people on the street, and we’re handing out flies on the street. Every old lady that had a normal haircut took the flyer, read the flyer, and said:

 

“Thank you!”

 

It literally came down to the haircut. Every grandma that had a shit haircut, that had a retarded purple haircut, they all just looked at us and was like:

 

“No, thanks.”

 

But every single, like, normal looking, wholesome grandma that has grandkids, like, a real grandma, not a refugee grandma, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Only the non-poisonous grandmas were friendly?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, the non-poisonous grandmas, they loved it! A couple of them, actually, at one point walked with me across the road with me and told me about how it’s getting out of out of control. And we’ve got all this on footage, so we’re just working out a way to sort of blur them and protect their identities so that they don’t get, like, attacked by Leftists, because these were some older women, they’re in their seventies and eighties, and they were basically saying:

 

“Thank you for what you’re doing.”

 

Like, it’s what all the Boomers had to say to us was:

 

“It’s getting out of control. Are you the guys that are going to do something about it? Are you the guys going to do? Are you going to do it?”

 

So it was really special. It was really awesome! And I want to do more of it.

 

Joel Davis: I was going up to people saying:

 

“Hey, I’m from the National Socialist Network. Can I interest you in a flyer?”

 

It was like:

 

“Hey, I’m a National Socialist. Here’s a flyer.”

 

Blair Cottrell: The standard Australian worker probably wouldn’t even really know what National Socialist was. They’ll know what Nazi is. But not everyone would actually understand what National Socialism is, so you’ve got that to your advantage there.

 

Joel Davis: Maybe we proved that there’s an optical valley to National Socialism.

 

But, yeah, we had some funny interactions. I went to one Boomer and handed him the flyer, and he just kind of took it. And I don’t think he was fully really paying attention. He just kind of took the flyer, and he looked at it, and then he read, said:

 

“Whiteman, fight back.”

 

And he’s like:

 

“Hey, mate, come back! Can I shake your hand?”

 

I was like:

 

“Yeah.”

 

And I shook his hand. And he’s like:

 

“Fuck the wokes! Fuck the wokes!”

 

Thomas Sewell: He’s like:

 

“This is a awesome!”

 

Joel Davis: And that was pretty cool!

 

And then, …

 

Thomas Sewell: There was another Boomer that you gave a flyer to, and he did the same thing. He kind of was:

 

“Oh, thanks, man.”

 

And just didn’t even look at it. And then you gave on to his wife. And then his wife was really interested! She’s like:

 

“Oh, yeah, this is awesome!”

 

And then we kept going because we were on the march. We’re kind of walking through. And then about five minutes later, he came charging up to us and was like:

 

“Can I have more of those? I’m gonna put them on my car! I’m gonna put them on the back of my car!”

 

Blair Cottrell: That was awesome! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe you’d walked off by then. But he came back, that guy. He was in a cowboy hat or something, like a cattleman’s hat. Yeah, it was awesome! The vibe was good. The vibe was very good.

 

There was only really two antagonists. One was this fat soy boy in his twenties, and they were doing, like, a little Palestine rally. There was, like four or five of them on the corner. They were waving Palestinian flags. So he was like a social, alternative fucking estrogenic faggot. And he came over to us and he said, it was really funny. It was really, really funny. We got on camera and he said:

 

“I’ve got it on the tip of my tongue. I’m about to say it.”

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m like:

 

“All right. Like, what is it? What have you got to say, buddy?”

 

And he was like:

 

“I’m trying! I’m trying here!”

 

I’m like:

 

“Yeah, it’s okay. Like, we’re here. We’re waiting. We’re listening. It’s okay. Like, spit it out. It’s all right.”

 

And he was like:

 

“Ahh. Ugh, this is hard. This is really hard for me!”

 

I’m like:

 

“It’s all right. Just come on! Calm down. Relax. I’m not gonna hurt you. Just say what you gotta say.”

 

And he was like:

 

“Ahh! Umm, you guys! Your problem, Tom, is you protect paedophiles!”

 

And I was like:

 

“What! What the fuck are you talking about?”

 

Blair Cottrell: Where did he get that from?

 

Thomas Sewell: And he was like:

 

“Oh, not paedophiles. Sorry. Hebrophiles!”

 

And then he just, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You know what this is, Tom?

 

Thomas Sewell: And then he said, …

 

Blair Cottrell: , you know what this is? This is his programming, which is commanding him to scream abuse at you, conflicting with the fact that if he does scream abuse at you’re going to uppercut him. And he’s like, … [chuckling]

 

[1:30:55]

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe. He was trying. He had a good try.

 

And then he was like:

 

“Anyway, that’s what I’ve got to say!”

 

And then he walked off, and was kind of chuffed with himself. And we were like:

 

“All right, all right, fair enough. Okay. Like, go away fatty.”

 

And then about ten minutes later this guy, and I hadn’t really properly processed this at the time, but I’ve had a lot of time to think about it since the weekend. He was wearing a Lego T-shirt. He was probably 55, 60 years old, fat as fuck, and he was wearing a Lego T-shirt and jeans. Yeah, he was really oestrogenic. And I think he was actually gay. He was running a Lego stand. He was kind of a closeted gay, like a secret gay. He was running a Lego stand. And we’d walked past maybe five or ten minutes earlier, and we’re handing out flyers and talking to people. And he came over and he said:

 

“I need you to go! I need you to leave1 I’ve called the police.”

 

And I said:

 

“I’m not going anywhere. Leave me alone. Like, go away. Like you’re causing an issue.”

 

And he was like:

 

“No, you need to go. You need to leave.”

 

And I was like:

 

“I’m standing here. Welcome to democracy, buddy. Go away!”

 

He started getting in my space, like, he started touching me and kind of elbowing me and I said:

 

“You’re a fucking professional victim, aren’t you? You’re looking to get hit, like you’re a piece of shit!”

 

He’s like:

 

“Oh, there’s no need to be aggressive, mate. There’s no need to be aggressive, mate!”

 

And he’s like, getting in my face and elbowing, elbowing the side of me just nudging me. And I kind of just gently kind of got him because I’m like:

 

“Fuck, I’ll kill this person accidentally if I hit him. So I’ll just move him away.”

 

And I just said:

 

“Go away. Like, you obviously, you don’t agree with us. You don’t support us. That’s cool. Go back to doing what’s important in life, which is Lego. Go back into your children’s toys. Go back to Lego.”

 

And he’s like:

 

“You guys feel special about yourselves marching around your uniforms. You’re a bunch of clowns!”

 

I’m like:

 

“Mate, you’re 60 years old. You’re in a Lego T-shirt!”

 

“I care about children!”

 

Blair Cottrell: What was that? Town in Queensland, that inland town in Queensland when we rallied. Toowoomba. What I did in Toowoomba, …

 

Thomas Sewell: In hindsight, honestly, we just need more of that. These people should be a little bit intimidated that we’re clearly not scary enough. The media make us out like we’re terrorists. If we really were these people wouldn’t come up to us and behave this way. So I think we need to be a little bit more scary because they’re so fucking annoying!

 

But anyway, this fat, oestrogenic faggot came over. He hassled. He kind of haggled us for five minutes, but we just kept handing out flyers. And one of his talking points was:

 

“Nobody agrees with you. Nobody supports you.”

 

And then we just hand out, like, ten flyers to a Zoomer crowd that go past. They’re all loving it. They’re like:

 

“Fuck Indians! We hate Indians! Kill them all!”

 

Like, Fed posting. And he’s like:

 

“Oh, no way!”

 

And then handing out flyers to all the hot chicks going past. And then two dads come over and start talking to us. And then another guy comes over and shakes our hand and he’s wearing military, what’s it called? Like, the military-surplus. He was a prepper or something. And he shook our hand. [chuckling] And it was funny as man, just seeing his morale drop the more people greeted us. And he was the only guy that was against us in the whole area.

 

So that was interesting to see.

 

But in hindsight, what I didn’t realise and what I should have said or asked was:

 

“Whose children are you doing Lego with? Because they’re not your own, are they, buddy?”

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: He was a fucking paedophile! He was a fucking faggot paedophile! And I want to know his name. I want to find out what his name is. And I want to make sure that the people of Bendigo know who this is.

 

Blair Cottrell: He might have just been a Lego enthusiast.

 

Thomas Sewell: No, no! He had a sinister energy.

 

Joel Davis: I thought he was just like one of the dads organising, like, a Lego day for the kids. Because at one point he was like:

 

“I’m just here trying to organise a Lego day for the kids here.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Why don’t you organise a fucking push-up day, you fat cunt?”

 

You know what I mean? [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s always the same physiognomy, though, man.

 

Joel Davis: But, an older other gentleman that was probably his gay lover that I just thought was one of the other dads or something.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. They weren’t with their kids. I didn’t realise it at the time. I thought they were dads and I thought they had kids with them. But there were other people’s kids. They weren’t their kids. They were just two random volunteers that were friends with each other that were running a Lego stand in the middle of town.

 

And the more I think about it, the more I’m like, I’m pretty sure he was secretly gay. And I reckon he’s a sex offender. I reckon if I can find out the guy’s name and send it to all our colleagues in Bendigo. And Bendigo is not a big place. It’s maybe 100,000 people. I’m sure the people of Bendigo will be able to tell us whether the guy was a paedophile or not.

 

[1:35:24]

 

 

Joel Davis: I just want to say if you like the stream, retweet the stream. Even better, like and retweet and let’s get the views up. Promote the stream. We’re on Twitter. We’re taking over Twitter. Hail Elon Musk, hail our people! I just want to say that now. So we get the retweets juiced. But you can go back to calling out this pedo, because we need to find him.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s what we said earlier. Who has a problem with fascism? Who has a problem with a nationalist government taking over the state apparatus? Who will lose from that? Every single working White Australian and even people that aren’t working, people looking for work, every single White Australian that is not up to some nefarious act to betray the country and destroy it, has literally nothing to fear. They only have things to gain. They’re like:

 

“Oh, cool. Housing is cheaper, there’s less traffic. Like, the services work better. Everyone’s kind and polite. You don’t need to lock the door. You don’t need to worry about your safety.”

 

Like, the whole society is going to improve except for people trying to destroy the country. And people that are up to nefarious acts.

 

So if you’re a financial parasite, for example, like the people within the financial sector that are robbing the country and enslaving it through interest, debt slavery, the people that are profiting off selling off Australia and its assets, the people that are grooming children, the paedophiles, the whole industry, the whole LGBT industry. These people have something to lose. These people are going to be unearthed. These people are going to have the state apparatus used against them.

 

So that’s why they haggle us in the street. They don’t want us to succeed. They don’t want us to take power. But every normal, functioning human being in society is just like., … I mean, obviously if they’re brown, they’re usually functioning, but they have to go back.

 

But all the White people, they’re either neutral or they support us. They’re like:

 

“Oh, well, we’ll see if you guys take power!”

 

You know, they don’t believe it. They’re not believers. There’s a lot of people that don’t think we can do it, but we can do it. And we’re going to do it, and we’re going to show everyone.

 

And then after we win and the state apparatus is being used against the people that are trying to destroy the country, the country will suddenly work a lot better.

 

Blair Cottrell: You’ve got to will it into action, don’t you? What I wish I could will into action is the removal of LED lights! Does anyone else hate LED lights? Like, I feel like they’re damaging my eyes.

 

Thomas Sewell: You gotta remove the [words unclear] room first.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah. And when I’m driving around on the street, I remember when I was young, car headlights, they just had this pleasant glow through them, but now they’re blinding! Now I’m squinting even at night while I’m driving, and I feel like my brain. I get headaches. My brain not shutting off. I’m not sleeping as easily as I used to, and I swear it’s LED lights, man. I think they’re really screwing with my eyes and my mind. It’s so sick of it! I don’t know if anyone else has the same experience, but.

 

Thomas Sewell: Hundred percent, 100%.

 

Blair Cottrell: So what’s next? Joel Davis?

 

So we got a new topic to move on to.

 

Joel Davis: We do. But I just wanted to tell one more funny story from the Bendigo thing, because I think the audience will enjoy this.

 

So there were there’s a couple little packs of Zoomer kids who loved us, and some of them may or may not. I cannot confirm more than I threw Romans. That would be illegal. But and, yeah, one of the boys may or may not have declared that he wanted to shoot Indians in the head and so on. There was a lot of based chatter.

 

Blair Cottrell: No! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the Zoomers were, … Talk about bad optics. Think we’re bad optics. The Zoomers were were making us look like a bunch of cuckservatives. You know what I mean? Some of the chat.

 

But there were this group of Zoomers, and they, like, walked off after we, like, spoke to them, and we handed them some flyers. And then they were all talking amongst themselves, and one of the guy’s girlfriend was down, and she was taking some pictures of us as we were doing things throughout the day, so she was a little bit further away, and she overheard them chattering. Like, the boys were like:

 

“Oh, let’s sign up. This would be sick! Like this is like the Aussie KKK! This is fucking based!”

 

One of the kids is like:

 

“Oh, I don’t know.”

 

And he’s like:

 

“What are you, a cuck?”

 

And they were like, full, like, so that was kind of cool like, to hear that report back. So, yeah, that was a cool story.

 

One thing I will say, though, about Bendigo, there’s a lot of surprisingly, it’s sad. There’s a lot of non-Whites there. We were only handing out flyers to White people, obviously. Like, but there was a lot of chinky there.

 

Thomas Sewell: There was one Asian, like, tourist that asked for one, and we were like:

 

“All right.”

 

We gave it to them.

 

Joel Davis: We gave them to all the White people and not to them, and they’re like:

 

“Can we please have one?”

 

We’re like:

 

“Okay.”

 

And then they, like, read it, and they just sat there.

 

[1:40:10]

 

Blair Cottrell: An Australian cultural experience for the Asian tourists. Like, they’ll tell that story when they go home. But Asians like to live amongst Whites, too, so they’re probably looking for the White racist areas.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, yeah.

 

There was an old man and a young kid that saluted us like a normal kind of military salute as we marched past, which was pretty. Well, we didn’t march past, as we walked past, which I thought was pretty funny.

 

Blair Cottrell: Tom, what is the standard Australian military salute? Is it the hand up or down?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, it’s like that. 45 degrees, right?

 

So when you wear a hat these two fingers here touch the brim of the hat. Like that. Yeah. And your arms kind of at that angle, like, at a 45 degree. Whereas the you know, the American salute like that. Yeah, we salute like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s more of an open handed. Almost like an honest salute.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. And I think, though, the Germans saluted differently. Like, they kind of had the hand facing them before, like the Wehrmacht salute versus the SS salute, which is obviously the HH one.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: But salutes all mean the same thing metaphysically. I mean, it means, like, we get the word “hey” from hail, which is like, hail, like, hello, hey, hail, like, hail Hitler or hail Odin or whatever.

 

Like, to say hello, hey. All that stuff to throw the salute, to do the open hand, it all means the same thing. It’s all a gesture in good faith between White people. And we’ve been doing it for 10,000 plus years. And they’re never going to be able to get rid of it. Just the only difference between the National Socialist or the staunch Roman salute is its a very exaggerated version of just saying hello to people. You know, everyone does it. Like, when you’re driving your car and someone let’s you in, you, like, you give them a little hail, you give them a little wave. So all that it is a militant, staunch, like, there can be no question asked about the faith of the gesture. Obviously coming from someone that’s pro-White when you’re doing it with that straight arm. It’s a very nationalistic, masculine and staunch physical gesture.

 

That’s why it’s so important that we continue to fight it, which is actually going on at the moment in the courts. A little update is that the police have charged two of the young guys with performing it prior to, like Michael Nelson and Nathan Ball, prior to the salute ban. And they charged them not with doing the salute because it wasn’t illegal at a time, but they’ve charged them with public indecency. Which, if you read the law, it’s basically like showing your genitals in public or mooning someone. And they’re trying to correlate the Roman salute prior to the Roman salute ban being like, akin to mooning or showing of genitals in public.

 

So they’re fighting that in the courts at the moment, but they’re postponing the court date until after we get a result from Jacob’s hearing, which should be, I think, in two weeks.

 

Joel Davis: For those who don’t know, Jacob is being charged more directly under the Roman salute ban over throwing a Roman salute, allegedly.

 

So that’s a very important case because from our position, collectively, legally, and also, I think Jacob’s position legally in the case is that Australians have a constitutional right to free political communication. There’s been many, …

 

Blair Cottrell: An implied right. It’s not actually a right. It’s an implied right.

 

Joel Davis: Implied right. Regardless. Like that’s the High Court precedent, is that we have a right to free political communication in this country according to the High Court, which is the highest court in the land.

 

So we have it, according to the court. That’s just, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s true. And actually the way they argued I was guilty in my hate speech or intent to incite ridicule hate speech court battle, was that my speech was actually limiting the free political expression of others by making them feel offended or uncomfortable. Right. So they argued it from that angle, which was interesting.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s the same argument that they’re making with Jacob. I swear I talked about this on stream last week, but maybe I didn’t.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, maybe they’re using the same precedent as they did with my, it worked with me. They got a conviction, so they’re probably using the same method.

 

Joel Davis: Well, what we’re arguing is that, yeah, like the non-Whites, they’re too intimidated to exercise their right to free political communication because Jacob throwing a Roman salute is intimidating them into staying silent and, or something. Which is a totally absurd argument!

 

Blair Cottrell: They should have to provide evidence of that they should have to have witnesses and evidence for that.

 

Thomas Sewell: If it was a real court. [chuckling]

 

[1:44:54]

 

Joel Davis: It’s an absurd argument on its face. Like it’s an absolute joke!:

 

“Oh, so you can’t exercise your right to free political communication because other people might be upset by what you say and therefore not communicate their politics!”

 

That’s just absurd on its face! That’s not freedom of political communication. It’s inherently wrong.

 

But yeah, this is an important case. Because free speech is a very important case. There is going to be, I think the Libertarian Party, but they’re bringing in other people. They’re doing a protest, not a protest, kind of like a rally in Sydney, I think, on Saturday. Don’t quote me on that. It could be Sunday, but look it up, in Sydney. And they’re going to have a lot of big speakers. I think Craig Kelly is going to be there. Like mainstream populist Right and libertarian speakers are going to be there rallying against the Misinformation Disinformation Bill*.

 

[* A proposal for legislation designed to tackle online misinformation has seen Australia’s Federal Government come under fire from an unlikely alliance of critics, who have warned it constitutes a “chilling assault” on free speech in Australia.

The Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024, which was introduced to Parliament last week by Communications Minister Michelle Rowland, would give the Australian Communications & Media Authority (ACMA) wide-ranging new powers to impose massive fines-up to 5% of global revenues-on social media platforms that allow the dissemination of misinformation and disinformation on their services. Claiming that misinformation and disinformation pose a “serious threat” to social cohesion and democracy, the legislation shifts responsibility for enforcing compliance onto the platforms hosting it, running the risk that corporations would put the protection of their bottom line above free speech and religious expression. Already in its second draught after an earlier version was universally condemned, including by the Australian Human Rights Commission, the updated legislation immediately came under ferocious attack by groups from all sides of public discourse. https://www.christiantoday.com/article/unlikely.alliance.forms.in.australia.over.fears.misinformation.bill.puts.free.speech.at.stake/142179.htm]

 

And obviously we’re not Libertarians. You know, we don’t support them politically. But on this issue we agree that they’re actually trying to provide some opposition to the bill.

 

And I encourage nationalists in Sydney to go down there and rub shoulders and maybe have a chat with some people, maybe be good networking opportunity for like minded people. I find lately it’s been very easy as a nationalist to talk to conservatives and libertarians. They’re much more open minded and receptive to hearing what I have to say than they were two years ago. Conservatives and libertarians are increasingly feeling that we’re on their side against the same enemy. Even if they don’t agree with us. I think we’re a little bit too extreme and too radical. Their attitude has shifted. Where before they really kind of like saw us as just like too crazy and that we were like a completely different category that they don’t associate with. I think now they’re feeling more like bunched up with us and more proximal to us.

 

And a lot of conservatives are just outright chill with us now. And that’s probably why we had such a chill reaction on the streets of Bendigo the other day and why no recent rallies that we’ve done have gone down a lot better, I think with the public.

 

Blair Cottrell: The normalisation of racism happening.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think that’s happening to a large extent.

 

But also, yeah, I think on this particular issue, the reason why they’re trying to censor the Internet is because they’re trying to shut us down! And people like us, like people with nationalist views. That’s the main reason! It’s not because they’re trying to shut down any of these other political ideologies. Like, yeah, they want to, they want to shut down certain other discourses they don’t like, critical of other government policies.

 

But the main number one priority is shutting down, quote, unquote “racism” and quote, unquote “anti-semitism”. That’s really what it really boils down to. And they’re trying to stand up and fight for our freedom of speech, our freedom to be racist, our freedom to advocate for our worldview.

 

And so we’re in alliance with them on this particular issue. We’re in a kind of free speech alliance de facto in Australian politics.

 

So we should go stand shoulder to shoulder with them and kind of create that camaraderie. Because that’s the message that I have to libertarians and conservatives. You might think that myself and Blair and Tom and people in our movement are too extreme or too radical for your taste, but we’re the fighters that are going to go and fight your enemies. The communists, the Marxists, the social liberals that have taken over not just the government, but all the kind of institutions of power in this country that are bringing in all these immigrants, that are destroying our culture, destroying our way of life, trying to teach the kids to be trans, teach them to hate Australia, trying to change the flag, change the national anthem, you know, give all the land back to the Aboriginals and all this crazy shit that they’re doing. We’re the guys that are going to go and take the fight to that enemy, which is your enemy, and you understand that’s your enemy.

 

So get out of our way at the very least, or maybe cheer us on going and kind of like taking the battle, being the Spearhead against all the political powers that be, that you hate and that you’re opposed to, that you recognise as your enemy. Like, we’re in this together in a certain sense. You need us. You need the radicals that are going to take the fight to them because frankly, the conservative movement, libertarian movement, you guys don’t have enough fight to really beat these guys. You don’t! You need a hardcore radical edge.

 

And that’s why the Left have won. Because the Left got out of its way of its communists, of its. Of its radical fringe. It allowed its radical fringe to take the charge, to lead the charge against the right for decades. They took over the universities, they infiltrated the Labour unions, they infiltrated the political parties. They got themselves in the media, all these different positions of power, and they push their agenda.

 

Because they got out the way of their radicals while conservatives and so on were canceling our radicals on the Right because we were bad optics or we were too extreme or whatever. They just ran over us!

 

So it’s time for you guys to take the shackles off the Nazis and let us fucking. Let us go at the enemy. Like we’re chained up in the backyard and we’re the pit bull, we just want to go and like bite the bone! [Blair laughing] you know, take the chain off. Let us go and bite these fucking commies!

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re worried, man. They’re worried that if we bite someone, we’re going to get put down. [chuckling]

 

[1:50:13]

 

Thomas Sewell: Before we move on from the Roman salute thing, I just wanted to read out. I’ve been helping them draught their submissions for the court. And one of the final points in the conclusion for their statements, I had, I’m just going to read it out to people because most people won’t actually watch the actual court case because it’ll be in a closed court or there won’t be the option for that. But what I’m helping them draught up was:

 

“To charge or convict White Australians for asserting their political rights in the face of foreigners asserting their foreign political issues.”

 

Because the context of their Roman salutes were, there was an Iranian protest in the city and they were aggravating the boys because obviously, you know, these fucking foreigners in our country, they assert their political so-called rights over us.

 

And anyway, the Roman salute was in retaliation. Well, not necessarily retaliation, but it was one group asserting their political rights, and then these two boys asserting their political rights. And one group got charged and the other didn’t. And you can guess who. But to finish that, I said:

 

“For them to assert their political rights in the face of foreigners creates a clear two tier policing and legal system, which ultimately establishes White Australians as Second Class citizens in their own country, whilst foreigners waving foreign flags become first class citizens who are allowed to offend with impunity.”

 

So they’ve actually done their homework, they’ve done a lot of work, and they’ve actually put together, they’re self representing, which at this level of court is fine to do it. Magistrates, you don’t need to get a lawyer. It’s a waste of money. They’ve already had five court dates and still nothing has happened. It’s still getting adjourned and pushed back.

 

So they’ve already saved themselves tens of thousands of dollars, which is very smart of them. And they’ve been doing their homework, and they’ve put together a very strong case for the history of the Roman salute. You know, the laws in regards to this, the precedents in regards to this, or the precinct cases. And also the fact that all part of living in a democracy or part of living in Victoria is you have to put up with other people you don’t agree with, and showing that these other groups do and say things that would be considered offensive by normal Australian standards.

 

Like, for example, the Aboriginals saying, you know, that Australia is going to be black in the future, or saying that they want to basically kill Whitey, or whatever their banner is supposed to say. And that none of these people have been charged. There’s no precedence that any Aboriginal has been charged for any of their offensive political demonstrations, which are against the sensibilities of all normal Australians.

 

And likewise, you know, there shouldn’t be a two tier system where White people should be charged for their political assertions. Which we obviously know there’s already precedents there. They’ve charged Blair and they obviously charged Neil Erikson and Chris Shortis with hurting the feelings of Muslims in 2017.*

 

[Far-right nationalists found guilty of inciting serious contempt for Muslims after mock beheading video. By James Oaten Topic: Courts and Trials Tuesday 5 September 2017 White nationalists found guilty of inciting serious contempt of Muslims (Louise Milligan) Three far-Right nationalists who staged a mock beheading to protest against the building of a mosque in Bendigo in central Victoria have been found guilty of inciting serious contempt of Muslims.

Blair Cottrell, Christopher Shortis and Neil Erikson have each been fined $2,000 after they filmed the beheading of a mannequin with a toy sword outside the Bendigo council offices in 2015. The so-called ‘Bendigo Three’ argued that their video, which was released on the United Patriot’s Front Facebook page, was an act of free speech that focused on a specific tenet of Islam. But the magistrate disagreed, arguing the video was clearly intended to create serious contempt for or ridicule of Muslims.

“We live in a community which is inclusive and that each individual deserves the right to live their life peacefully.”

Magistrate Peter Hardy said.

“You more than just crossed a line.”

It is the first time a criminal charge under Victoria’s Racial and Religious Tolerance Act has been tested in court. Other charges relating to damaging public property were struck out. The three men have since told the media that they intend to appeal the decision, saying they “expected” the outcome. Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-09-05/three-men-found-guilty-of-inciting-serious-contempt-for-muslims/8874804]

 

Joel Davis: I just want to say quickly, the details. The rally is Saturday, like this coming Saturday, the 28th in Sydney at Speaker’s Corner. 08:30 am. So get down there. I encourage you if you live in Sydney and I’d get down there on Saturday, go check it out. I think some of the boys would be down there. So you might meet some friendlies. You know, you might spot the [word unclear] of a seemingly co-White nationalist. It’s a chance to meet and greet at a neutral location and maybe have a chat also to the conservatives and the Libertarians down there. You could have some productive conversations and support the opposition to this Bill, which is a really bad Bill that’s going to negatively impact our ability to spread our ideas online and just our general online freedoms. So it’s good to see public opposition. And I think they’re going to do a rally in Melbourne, a similar outfit, a similar rally, I think not this weekend, but next weekend, but I guess we’ll talk about it on the show next week. I don’t know too many details about that one, so just want to put that out there. It’s important to be politically involved in issues like this.

 

I think free speech, our core engagement with the mainstream, the political mainstream is free speech issues, obviously anti-immigration and pro-deportation. Anything to do with those are like our kind of bread and butter. Like, one is like our core most core issue and which is just the demographics of the country.

 

And the other is like protecting our ability to advocate for ourselves, like in public and organise a political movement. You know, those are like really like the two most essential issues, I think, when we’re engaging with the political mainstream. So, I mean, there’s lots of other issues to concern ourselves with. So, yeah, that’s just my view on that.

 

Do you guys want to talk about, because, Blair, you did a Twitter space a few days ago and you were making, I think, an interesting point, which I think you should reiterate here on the stream. Where you were talking about how you think that excessive moralizing and ideological minutiae often gets in the way within the movement of focusing upon a clear and focused form of messaging that is just going to achieve maximum popularity and achieve maximum clarity of, who’s on our side, who’s against us.

 

And I thought you stated your case quite well. So I thought I was just going to invite you to reiterate that point. And it’s actually interesting. So, yeah, you want to jump into that?

 

[1:56:00]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: I think I stated it so well it over the heads of a lot of my standard audience.

 

So for that reason, I just removed the replay because I wanted to articulate it better. I don’t expect I’ll articulate it as well as I want to now. It’s getting late in the night, and this is the time at which my brain starts to shut down, because I’m only slightly smarter than average. I’m not that smart. When I get tired, I go to average and below become like everybody else again. And I’m almost at that point now. [chuckling]

 

So look my observation was that we basically suffer from too much idealism. White people generally, we get tricked, misled, and have the scope of our reasoning powers severely limited by that idealism. An example of this is the equality concept. We all know you guys watching this show probably agree that human equality is ridiculous! But it doesn’t really matter how matter how ridiculous it is. It’s this kind of reality, this social programme that most people adhere to, even if they don’t agree with it, in order not to suffer social consequences, right?

 

But in contrast to our race, our ethnic community, we have the jewish community, jewish people. And they don’t have this long list of ideals and social values about justice and truth and morality that they’re in adherence to. They just have this singular ideal, one only. And that is the ideal of their own superiority over non-jews.

 

And the fact that non-jews exist only to serve them, or die, whatever. They don’t care, as long as they’re number one. That’s the ideal governing our enemy.

 

And you can see how we’re at a tremendous disadvantage if we’re going to allow ourselves to be severely limited, not just in belief and understanding, but also in action, in what we can actually do in order to effectively stand up to and overthrow this enemy, right? Because this enemy, to quote Churchill when he was speaking about the power the jewish communists had over Russia:

 

“This enemy has gripped us by the hair on our heads all around the world!”

 

And I think in order to fight this enemy, we need to understand that over moralizing, having too many ideals is going to restrict our reasoning powers and our ability to move. We need to be able to move in many different directions, and we need to be able to say whatever we need to say and do whatever we need to do in order to establish the kind of results, measurable results! Victories! And results in regards to securing our own existence, right? And that was the point that I was trying to make in the space. I thought that I could articulate it better, though.

 

And like I said, I don’t think I’ve done that good of a job now, either. I’ve got to think more about it because it all just comes down to what I always talk about, which is just having that singular, simple view of life, boiling everything down to that one us versus them dynamic. This is who we are. We’re defending that. We’re advancing that over there is who our enemy is, down with them.

 

And whatever you need to do in that process of building up your own community and sort of destroying or at least releasing yourself from the grip of your enemies, you do it. And what frustrates me, I suppose, is there’s a lot of things that members of our own ethnic community won’t do for moral reasons. You know, they won’t fight dirty enough.

 

For example, the jewish community, they’ll say that they support equality in our nations, but they won’t support equality in their own nation, right?

 

So they’ve got that ability to change their stance where necessary in order to put their enemies at disadvantage and then make their own position more advantageous to them in certain circumstances. I don’t want to get too much more into it for the time being, but, you know what I’m trying to say, right? We need to be able to do whatever we have to do to win! That’s what I’m trying to say. And if we’re going to be restricted to a certain scope of reasoning or activity as a result of morals, truth, justice, idealism, anything which restricts us too much, shouldn’t be taken into consideration. Or at the very most, we should pretend or ostensibly be seen to observe it. But then we’re not actually observing it. You understand what I mean by that?

 

The jews are very good at that as well. They pretend to observe our morals and traditions, for example. But then when you pay attention to what they’re actually doing, they’re not showing any respect whatsoever to our traditions and basic moral structure of society. They’re changing it from within.

 

So, yeah, something to think about, that’s all.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. The way I would phrase it is that politics is more fundamentally existential than it is moral. Like, politics is not there to decide over all moral questions. A lot of that is left to the domain of your personal life. The point of politics is to secure peace and security for your people.

 

Basically, the reason why we have to come together and form governments and form big societies is because we need a powerful entity to stand up for us against all the other potential powerful entities in this world that are going to come and take our shit and fuck us over. Because we live in a hostile world. There’s many other groups in this world that don’t give a shit about you. They don’t give a shit about your family, I don’t give a shit about your country. And they want to take as much from you and your people as they can.

 

And the reason why you need politics is so that you can have guys that are on your side that understand that our group, our people need to stand up and defend ourselves to protect what is ours from that hostile world.

 

So that’s what politics is about. It’s about securing a future, securing your way of life. It’s not about deciding on all these moral questions. So, like, for example, I see in my Telegram chat or on Twitter, like a basically endless argument, for example, between Christians and pagans that agree on White nationalism, and they get into this massive back and forth. And this is a very intellectually interesting debate. And it’s an important debate, like your personal decision, but whether you are a Christian or not, or a pagan or not, or whatever is actually very important, obviously.

 

[2:02:27]

 

But when it gets to the point where you’re dividing the entire movement on the basis of this other issue, and therefore you’re dividing Whiteman power, you’re dividing pro-White resources, and you’re basically limiting our capacity to build the most powerful possible movement to defend our people’s interests, well, then it’s actually destroying the point of this. The point of this movement is securing a future for White people, and particularly in Australia, it’s for securing this future for White Australians and White Australia. That’s what this is about.

 

There’s other issues that are important, but they aren’t essential to that goal. And so there has to be a kind of marginalisation of things which aren’t essential to the political movement from the political movement where we can agree to disagree and work together upon securing a future for our people.

 

And obviously you’re going to go to, one group’s going to go to church, one group’s going to do whatever.

 

And once the ethno-state is secured and all enemy threats have been neutralised, then you guys can debate over are we going to have Christian White Australia or pagan White Australia or whatever? If you really want to.

 

But, you know, now is not the time for that. And there’s so much like ideological spurgery where people want to debate minutiae rather than getting done to the brass tacks of how the hell are we going to get manpower and resources organised to defend our fucking race? How are we going to make sure our race fucking survives?

 

And if you’re not operating on that level where that’s the main focus of what you care about and what you’re doing when you’re in the White nationalist movement online, if instead you’re going on in the White nationalist movement online and all you’re doing is engaging in e-drama against other White nationalists and picking fights over like, dumb shit and arguing over, yeah, as I said, ideological minutiae or whatever, that is tangential to the essential points of how we’re going to progress the movement, how are we going to advance our people, then like, what the fuck are you doing? You’re not in the White nationalist movement. You’re not actually engaging in politics per se. You’re just like, hanging out on the Internet, getting into frivolous arguments.

 

So that’s something that’s very important, I think, where we must focus upon the core, as Blair said, like, who are we? Who are we against? And how are we going to advance our cause against the enemy and just be like, very single mindedly focused upon those objectives. And if we can get our attention and focus on those objectives and our money and time focus on those objectives, then we have a fucking chance of surviving as a race. But otherwise we’re just going to be having these dumb spurgy arguments for the 4,000,000th time on the:

 

“Oh, all pagans are jews, all Christians are jews!”

 

Or whatever.

 

Blair Cottrell: All we have to do is survive, …

 

Joel Davis: Calling each other jewish, communist. And it’s like, what the fuck are we doing here? You know what I mean?

 

Blair Cottrell: The simple nature of our struggle too, is all we have to do is survive. I think I said it on last stream, or the stream before that we’re a race that so long as we survive in our most basic form and we don’t become overly diluted, if we have the same opportunity to procreate, flourish, then we eventually adapt, win, overcome. We become master of the world. That’s why there’s such a strong genocide effort against our race right now. Because in order to win against White people, you need to ethnically destroy them. If you don’t, they eventually rise, win, adapt, and become master of the world again. So all we have to do is survive as a race, and by default we end up winning as a result of our own genetic predisposition.

 

Joel Davis: And like, I understand that a lot of these arguments are actually important, and there’s a space for them. Like, if there’s intellectual content creators and there’s an intellectual, and I engage in that sometimes as well. But we have to learn how to bracket that from the political, that, like, we can have that argument in the intellectual space of the free marketplace of ideas, and we can debate these subjects, but we need to be able to bracket the political friend-enemy distinction from that and say:

 

“Well, at the end of the day, I don’t agree with this person on this issue and that issue, but we need to have some kind of coordination or some kind of allegiance or loyalty to one another if we’re going to get out of this as a race.”

 

Because if we have, like, every different ideological sub faction and religious sub faction and so on splintering off and doing their own thing, that isn’t going to cut it. We need to be pro-White first and foremost. That has to be the essential principle of the movement. Race has to be the foundation. That’s the only foundation which is the correct foundation!

 

First of all, because we are being attacked as a race by the enemy. Fundamentally, the enemy is coming after us because of our race, not because of any of these other details. And they’re coming after us as a race. So we have to defend ourselves as a race.

 

But secondarily, race is the only principle which is going to be strong enough to build a political movement around to resist this.

 

[2:07:33]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s because it’s the most integral, fundamental identity that you can use to identify yourself, right? Like Christian, pagan, Catholic, Protestant, and various other social political identities they’re all just abstract. They exist inside your mind and you can change them tomorrow. Like, I can wake up tomorrow and decide I’m going to be Catholic. I can wake up tomorrow and decide that I’m going to be Protestant of some degree. But I can’t wake up tomorrow and decide I’m going to be black, or a different race. I’m like, genetically this race. This is who I am, and it’s a result of hundreds, thousands of years of survival, through my family lineage, and that is my most fundamental identity, as is the same for you if you’re watching this stream. So you’ve really got to boil it down to that, because that’s the most important fundamental identity that you can have the understanding of, right? That’s who you are.

 

Joel Davis: It also, like these other things are important. Religion and everything is important, but as a principle of unity, because politics is a team sport, politics it’s not a individual sport. You know MMA is a sport for individuals. Like, you need a team to train with and stuff, but politics is a team sport. You need a big team. If you try to play a team sport with not enough players against a full strength team, you get smacked. That’s why if you play soccer and half your team gets red carded, well, you’re going to lose. You know, if it’s five to eleven, you’re going to lose.

 

And White people are playing like, one vs eleven because everyone wants to be an individual and we’re so atomized, but then also we’re like, intellectually atomized and so on. And we have to just at the end of the day, be, we’re on the same team. You don’t have to like everyone on your team. You don’t actually have to like everyone on your team. You can think there’s a bunch of people on your team that are shit people and they’re fucking retards! But they’re on your fucking team! And we win as a team or we lose as a team. Like, White people win as a race or we lose as a race. That’s how this is going to go down.

 

So we need to play as a team to the fullest extent possible.

 

And then, yeah, once we win, then we can go back to fucking our disputes and differences and so on. And they are totally legitimate disputes and differences. Like, I’m not denying their importance, but we are born into a time in history of race war. Race war is already happening. Like, the race war isn’t going to happen at some point.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s arguably been a constant for known human history.

 

Joel Davis: Well, yeah. We are born into a race war. Like, the invaders are in our country, the shit skins are raping the women, they’re breeding with our tribe, they’re taking over our institutions. You know, the jews are controlling the banks, they’re controlling the media, they’re controlling the government. They’ve got all that third world invaders taking all these positions of power and all the systems in place to elevate them to rule over us. Like, we’re already being occupied by, like, alien forces that are systematically using state repression to prevent us from organising. Like, the race war is already here. You’re in a race war!

 

So it’s like you can have all your arguments about everything else, but it’s like, do you want to fucking win or lose? I want my grandchildren to not be a persecuted minority in the land that their forefathers built. I want them to actually have protection. I want them to have their own country that’s going to take care of them.

 

So that’s what this is about! And a lot of people somehow managed to lose sight of that. And it’s actually quite frustrating.

 

I don’t know if you have thoughts on this, Tom.

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ve expressed my feelings on this many times on the show, and I don’t really want to repeat myself. To have a sort of fresh, fresh eyes on its a very good point this idea that it’s a team sport, we’ve got to stop thinking about it as individuals. Lot of people that just want to be left alone, and you need to take your politics to its logical conclusion. You can be left alone for now and maybe next year, and the year after and the year after, but you’re just kicking the can down the road.

 

At some point, we need to solve the problem. There is a problem, an existential problem, or a problem for the existence of our people, and we are slowly becoming a minority in our countries, and we have to put a stop to that! And we’re in a stronger position to put a stuff to it now, rather than later.

 

So let’s deal with it now!

 

Anyone that’s like:

 

“Oh, well, actually, I’m going to stay as embedded in the system as possible and I might send a Superchat and yeah, I’ll consume content, but, yeah, like, I’ll just I’ll just keep working on my career. And that’s the priority because then I can pay for my 2.5 kids and a Labrador in a city.”

 

It’s like:

 

“Okay, and then what are your kids gonna do?”

 

And really disagree fundamentally with the strategy, the life strategy of:

 

“Well, we’ll just build the tower taller and then we won’t have to smell the shit!”

 

It’s like, no, let’s just clean up the shit! Like, let’s just solve the problem. And then your children, whatever they do in life, they’re gonna just kick goals, they’re gonna succeed, they’re gonna be winning, because they’re going to be growing up in a healthy society, and that’s just not the future that’s destined for them on the current trajectory.

 

[2:13:09]

 

So we have to be radical in changing that trajectory and not giving a fuck about what traitors and faggots and weaklings think about how we should change it.

 

So in summary, it comes down to a triumph of the will. It comes down to, as an individual, are you subject to or subject of this society, or are you going to contribute to building a better society?

 

And I think that’s really what it comes down to, this master and slave morality. If you have a slave morality, then you’re subject to society’s whims. You know, if it’s socially acceptable to be X or Y or Z, then you’ll do it, because it’s socially acceptable:

 

“It’s not socially acceptable the moment to be a Nazi!”

 

It’s like, well, it’s fucking never going to be with that attitude!

 

So why don’t you just stop caring about what it is or isn’t to be socially acceptable in a society that glorifies faggots and traitors and fucking merchants! That’s the faggot society we live in. It glorifies that shit! Why don’t you not care about that? Why don’t you have a solar morality, or a master morality where it’s:

 

“Well, actually I value these things. I value integrity. I value honour, I value our race, I value our culture, I value our heritage. I don’t actually care about society’s values. It’s society that needs to change, not me!”

 

And when you bring that attitude to the table now, you’re more committed to solving the problem.

 

And what I’ll finish with is Western Chauvinist, if you don’t follow them already on Telegram or Twitter, you should. Western Chauvinist shared something today that was a good summary of what all the critics have of us and our model and our worldview. And it’s in quotation marks:

 

“You think you’re going to win by meeting up with guys to box in the park?”

 

End quotation mark. And what Western Chauvinist replies to this is he says:

 

“No, I think we’re going to win by organising. You can’t organise seriously with a bunch of risk adverse, conflict avoidant podcast fans. If someone will meet in the park to train with you, they’re infinitely more committed to the cause than someone who sends Superchats to their preferred online hot taker. If your entire connection to the cause can be cut off by your phone running out of battery, you’re not doing anything.”

 

And that’s what I’ll finish on. That’s where power comes from small groups of men and their families banding together and forming local community. They’re only able to do the kind of shit they’re doing to us at the moment, like the horrible treatment that they’re having of us, because we’re atomized.

 

Despite the fact that we’re still a majority in our own country, we’re an atomized majority! We’re an alienated majority! We don’t have community that is 100% clear as to what its community purpose is. We have all these sub communities within the White race. We have Richmond Football Club or Carlton Football Club. We have the Diggers Club or the RSL. We have the Rotary Club. We have, you know, it just infinite White people clubs. Infinite White people clubs, but none of them are explicitly White. We have infinite White people clubs, but also zero White people clubs! Because they’re not explicit.

 

So for us to secure an existence for our people, a future for our children, we have to make explicit organisations that stand on that bedrock of race! And be unafraid and confrontational and prepared to bear the brunt of that.

 

So when you go down that path, you will initially lose. When you go down that path, so lose is the wrong word. You will initially have loss. And that’s what everyone’s afraid of that’s why people don’t want to do it, because you’re afraid of that initial loss. I understand that loss is not nice. But to grow, you have to have trauma. To grow, you have to have stress.

 

Blair Cottrell: You only, like doctrine is written in blood. You only actually learn by losing, adapting, and sort of growing as a result. If you never lose, you never learn anything. And you never actually develop the necessary adaptations to prevent yourself from losing in that same way again.

 

And so the more we lose, the stronger we get.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, you will lose family. You will lose friends. You will lose privileges. You will lose maybe extra income. You know, you will lose career prospects. You will initially have loss. And those losses will be a sacrifice. They will all add up.

 

But it’s highly unlikely that 99.9% of you, while things are still peaceful, are going to be killed. You’re actually more likely to die in a car crash than from being a nationalist. So far, we haven’t had a single nationalist in Australia this decade assassinated. Not one! We’ve had one terrorist attack against us, one serious one, and a few minor ones. But these are publicly facing spokespeople. We’re not asking anyone to do that. We’re asking for men to stand with us in the street and to be part of our community and for our wives to know your wives and for our kids to grow up together so that they’re not growing up around all the freaks in society. You know, we’re trying to build. That’s what we mean by parallel community.

 

[2:18:36]

 

So, yeah, we’re at the Spearhead, we’re at the vanguard. We’re at the forefront. But there is no reason why you can’t be in a supporting role with that.

 

But in the absence of that, as I said earlier in the show, we are trying to build a way to incorporate more people into the broader, another ring or another circle to our movement. If we’ve got a kind of inner circle and an outer circle, we’re building another circle, a supportive circle.

 

But that is still, like, what we really need more than just money and finances to push the movement into the next area that it needs to go, which is more professional, more facilities. We need support in managing the whole operation as well, financial support. What we need also is people to come to events.

 

So we have all of our community meetings, we have all of our protests, stuff like this. We understand if people want to be risk averse to that, but we need people to come out in person, in real life, to events, whether they be ticketed events, whether they be like, once or twice a year at a national meetup. We’re not asking you to necessarily be in black block and march in the street with us. We understand that the apprehension for some people to do that, for a lot of people to do that.

 

But, you know, it would be good to have you on the mailing list. It would be good to be able to send you guys stuff, physical stuff that we can produce, when we’ve got all that sort of stuff set up, of showing you what we’ve done, like progress reports, monthly reports of:

 

“Hey, this is what we’ve done. This is the activism we did. This is the training we did, this is the meetups we did.”

 

Stuff like that would be awesome to have in order to continue to build community.

 

And then when we do have these events, you can be actually there, you can be present, you can be a live listener.

 

And then that in itself, even if it’s just a photo of the back of your head, in a crowd of 100 or 200 or 300 or 500 people, that in itself encourages other people to get involved at different levels, at different capacities. So your sacrifice, what you risk and what you sacrifice, actually pays into a spiritual fund. I know this sounds a bit ridiculous, but your sacrifice, everything you lose, it actually contributes ultimately to our victory. Because when enough people have sacrificed enough, then we win. And it’s going to take a lot of men and a lot of families and a lot of sacrifice, a lot of time, a lot of blood, sweat and tears to get where we need to go. I’ll finish there.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think we should maybe start getting into the Superchats. Cause we’ve been going for a while now.

 

But my final thoughts on this. You know, one of the main criticisms that we get is that we refer to ourselves as National Socialists ideologically. And the view is that people would be willing to organise around White nationalism, but National Socialism freaks people out or something. This is the argument. And my response to that is that I think, and we think, that until National Socialism is seen as something positive for a large portion of the community, they will be too cucked to actually organise a revolutionary, pro-White movement, because of all the things that are bound up with that.

 

Now, I can understand you say:

 

“Should we use the swastika as a symbol?”

 

And these are all like interesting arguments or whatever, but as a basic point, if you are willing to put your race first and organise around on the basis of race, you are going to at the very least, be kind of open minded to the idea that National Socialism is a good idea. You’re not going to be freaked out like:

 

“That’s a horrible, evil thing!”

 

But also additionally, the main way in which people get freaked out that being a pro-White or being White nationalist is a horrible, evil thing is implicit in this argument is through its association to National Socialism. So that means we’re going to have to do some work to try and give National Socialism a new meaning and a difference of perspective in the community. We have to do some work to normalise National Socialism.

 

We’re going to have to do some work, get people comfortable with and supportive of National Socialism to break that spell! Because that spectre is still going to be there. Like, if you make, if we make an organisation, it’s purely just called “White nationalists”. It’s purely White nationalists. There’s no explicit association with National Socialists. You’re going to get called Nazis! And there’s going to be this spectre of:

 

“Well, what do you think about Hitler and the Holocaust?”

 

And like, this whole thing is still going to be like this spectre, like lingering over the movement that you can’t step over.

 

And if you basically refuse to then go out and actually defend National Socialism or talk about it in a positive light and just try and avoid, avoid, avoid, avoid, avoid! That thing is going to stay there. It’s going to be this thing hanging over your head entirely, and you’re doing absolutely nothing to fight back against it or break the spell, because you’re afraid of breaking the spell because you think that:

 

“Well, that’s extra work if we have to break the spell and advance White nationalism. Now we’re doing two things. Wouldn’t it just be easier if we could just advance White nationalism?”

 

And it’s like, no! We actually have to break the spell. I don’t think we’re actually going to be able to get there without doing some spell-breaking.

 

[2:23:53]

 

So that’s why we’re taking the hard road of breaking the spell. But we’re creating a new brand of White nationalism. It’s going to be this Australian 21st century. It’s not a copy and paste. We don’t have the same uniformity. We have a lot of differences with our own personality. We’re going to do a new form of this. And, yeah, we’re going to talk about what we like, about what the Germans did and so on, but it’s going to be our version, it’s going to be different, and it has our characteristics. And as it grows, it’s going to have all these very 21st century Australian characteristics, because we’re very 21st century Australians. If, you know, us, you see us, we’re kind of normal Aussie guys. We’re nothing doing like this German larp on the basis of some German fetishism. But we do take inspiration from that movement, because within European, and particularly Germanic, and we’re a Germanic nation. We’re not a German nation, but we’re a Germanic people. A Celto-Germanic people. The Australian nation, in its core.

 

The one political ideology that stood up to liberalism and communism successfully was National Socialism! There isn’t actually another ideology in the modern world that has done that.

 

So that’s why we’re taking our cues from that, because that’s what we’re trying to do here, because we see these two other option ideologies as both ideologies that are trying to genocide our fucking race!

 

So that’s what’s happening.

 

So to me, like, that’s our position. You might disagree, but deal with that particular argument. The argument that we’re always. I’m always hearing is that if we just step over National Socialism and pretend it doesn’t exist and say that we aren’t Nazis and just completely avoid the subject, that somehow, by magic, this will prevent us from having to defend ourselves from the accusations or deal with the subject of National Socialism in any capacity. You’re not going to be able to do that. Sorry!

 

So we’re going to have to normalise this.

 

That’s why it’s so good! Hitler’s going viral on TikTok. And people are making videos about World War Two revisionism, and David Irving and his books need to be promoted. And we need to talk about these things we talked about, like the Tucker Carlson interview the other day with the revisionist historian and so on. This stuff is also fucking important because we need to break the spell and we need to put all of our energy behind breaking the spell. And White people need to develop a positive view of Adolf Hitler en masse. They need to develop a positive view of National Socialism. You then have to become necessarily ideological National Socialists. They need to develop a positive view, or at least a neutral view and a kind of more objective view. Where right now no one is even really doing that except for us on the fringe because of this spell.

 

So we’re trying to break that spell. We’re trying to present a form of National Socialism contemporary in the modern day to, for people to relate to and support. And that’s one of the key ways in which that spell is going to be broken. So that’s what I have to say about that.

 

If you want to say something about that, Tom, you can. Otherwise we’ll get into the Superchats.

 

Thomas Sewell: No, I think it’s being covered. We should go into the Superchats.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So Rose Rock.

 

Thomas Sewell: Let’s do the first one.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Rose Rock 444 said:

 

“Why do you support Fuentes? He pushes inceldom and finds non-White women more attractive than White women. Not to mention he simps for nons like Candace Owens and Muslims.”

 

I have a suspicion that Rose Rock 444 is a woman. I don’t know, but we.

 

Thomas Sewell: How out of touch is that commentary, though?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, if you watch the show last week. I’ve listened into a few of Fuentes’s shows this week and he basically talks shit about me in every single episode.

 

So we’re not exactly getting along so great lately. But yeah I don’t know, whatever comments that he made about non-White women being more attractive or not, that’s not really, … The substance of our disagreement is about political strategy. I don’t know. All the comments that he’s made on all of these subjects. Simping for Candace Owens was pretty cringe, though. I remember seeing that.

 

Warbow 84, said:

 

“Here’s my $20. Great show. See you guys next week.”

 

Thanks, man. Ghost dog Man’s did like one of, like the little o’s with like, the slash, like throwing a Roman. Fellow Comrade said:

 

“Here’s my $200 for the week. Spend it wisely.”

 

But he only sent $1, so I don’t know.

 

Blair Cottrell: What does he mean by that? I saw that earlier. I thought, what does he mean by that?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, you owe me $199, dude!

 

Blair Cottrell: By the end of the week, too. By the end of the week. You have to be man of your word in this stream, bro.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I think he probably just clicked the wrong button.

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know. Ferryman 47. I don’t know if that’s Ferryman as in from Ferryman’s Toll in Canada, but friend of the show. He sent $14. He said:

 

“Cheers, boys!”

 

Duke of Meme said:

 

“I was not full blown White nationalist until you said, you want to ban LED lights, Blair, please take complete control of Australia!”

 

There you go. You won someone over.

 

[2:29:18]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Don’t worry, I hate them enough to actually implicate an immediate ban if I’m ever in a position to do so.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Adolf Caesar said:

 

“Good evening, White men. Do we have any NS literature from Australia?”

 

I’m not sure if there’s explicit ideologically National Socialist literature that is from Australia. There’s a lot of White nationalist literature. I don’t know. Tom, are you aware of anything that’s explicitly NS, that’s been written?

 

Blair Cottrell: I have a feeling there’s something, but nothing’s coming to mind immediately.

 

Thomas Sewell: First thing that came to mind wasn’t explicitly National Socialist, but interestingly, some of the first works done at the beginning of the 20th century on neo-Paganism was done by an Australian, and he actually went and visited the fascists and National Socialists in Europe, as Alexander Rud Mills*. So that’s sort of proto-NS stuff.

 

But, yeah, I can’t really think of anything. I mean, Jacob would know. I mean, there’s a lot of Australiana literature that is pretty close. I mean, Jack Lang** wrote pretty similar.

 

[* Alexander Rud Mills was an Australian barrister and writer, interned in 1942 for his National Socialist sympathies and fascist beliefs. He was also a prominent Odinist, one of the earliest proponents of the rebirth of Germanic Neopaganism in the 20th century, and an anti-semite. He founded the First Anglecyn Church of Odin in Melbourne in 1936. He published under his own name and the pen-names “Tasman Forth” and “Justinian”. Wikipedia]

[** John Thomas Lang (21 December 1876 – 27 September 1975), usually referred to as J. Lang during his career and familiarly known as “Jack” and nicknamed “The Big Fella”, was an Australian politician, mainly for the New South Wales Branch of the Labor Party. He twice served as the 23rd Premier of New South Wales from 1925 to 1927 and again from 1930 to 1932. He was dismissed by the Governor of New South Wales, Sir Philip Game, at the climax of the 1932 constitutional crisis and resoundingly lost the resulting election and subsequent elections as Leader of the Opposition. He later formed Lang Labour that contested federal and state elections and was briefly a member of the Australian House of Representatives. Wikipedia]

Joel Davis: Jack Lang was a little bit more like of a liberal socialist that was also a White nationalist.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. It’s all sort of proto-National Socialist stuff. I wouldn’t say it’s explicitly like post World War Two. I can’t think of anyone post World War Two, any Australian that stands out in terms of National Socialist literature.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I’ll be, I’ll be writing some. So there you go. You’ll get some from Joel Davis. I’m cooking things up. I got a lot of draughts, and I’ll start putting some things out in short order. Eventually, I will write a book. I’ve been cooking ideas up for many years.

 

So, yeah, you’ll get some. Joel Davis, Australian NS literature. So there you go. Keep an eye out for that.

 

Thomas Sewell: I wrote two draughts, a fiction and a nonfiction book when I was in prison. I just don’t find it, I don’t think it’s appropriate to publish. I want to do something better. So I’ll either rework it or I’ll write something else from scratch. But my book projects definitely on the back burner. I’m focusing on just putting a roof over our heads as a movement. And for my own family to begin. And things like books, I think they can age better with time.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I know that as I get older, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m not rushing it.

 

Joel Davis: I’ll become more and more of a writer and speaker, intellectual type, and it won’t be doing as much on the ground work on the streets. You know, at some point you get, when you’re an old man, that’s kind of like your main thing that you can do because you’re just old and old! So but that doesn’t mean I’m going to wait till then to get started.

 

Ethan 4BD1 said:

 

“Australia for the Whiteman. Destroy pedo freaks!”

 

Indeed. And Leviran, or, yeah, Leviran said:

 

“If you are watching this and you’re under 30 years old and you haven’t joined a nationalist organisation to serve your people, then you are a pussy! Australia for the Whiteman and Reclaim America!”

 

I think Reclaim America is like a Patriot Front slogan. So maybe he is a Patriot Front, bro.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why at 30?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. If you’re in your early thirties, you can still join, or even late thirties. I mean, we have guys that are in their forties in the Org.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is 30 old? Why, is that what’s being implied, that 30s old?

 

Thomas Sewell: Our oldest member is 64, and our oldest supporter, I think, is 74.

 

So, yeah, there’s no excuse. I don’t think age is a factor. It just, age to me just means there’s so many different cliques, social cliques within our Org and within the wider movement. Age is not a determining factor as to whether you should join or not. Age is just a factor of what you participate in and what you can participate in. You know, you might not be doing Muay Thai at the park, but you can man the barbecue and hang out with the other old guys. Like, there’s not really any excuse. There’s a place for everyone.

 

Like, not everyone, obviously. Like, we don’t want the scum and filth of society, but there’s a place for every, like, honourable Whiteman and his family in our organisation, no matter how old you are. Yeah, I would say we don’t recruit anyone under the age of 16 just because of the maturity level.

 

The majority of 15 year old boys are just not politically mature enough to take this seriously. It’s usually irony. But, yeah, we’ve got guys in their late teens and they’re obviously always keen as mustard because there’s genius, not just genius in the youth, but there is energy in the youth. The youth have a natural, … I think it’s Kurt Eggers*. Kurt Eggers talks about it. He was a National Socialist. He was a high ranking officer and part of the propaganda department as well. And he actually died in combat. He actually asked to be sent back to the front lines.

 

[* Kurt Eggers (10 November 1905 – 12 August 1943) War correspondent and writer (1905-1943) Kurt Eggers was a German writer, poet, songwriter, and playwright with close links to the Nazi Party. He served as both a member of a propaganda company and as a Waffen-SS soldier at the rank of Mann in World War II, he was killed while serving in a tank regiment on the Eastern Front by the Red Army. He had four children by his second wife, Traute Kaiser, whose father was a pastor. Wikipedia]

 

And I think he died in the battle of Kursk. But he was a tank commander and he dropped out. Not dropped out of school, but during the summer holidays. He actually went and fought in the Freikorps* when he was 13 years old. And he actually writes about how the youth have a natural instinct. The more masculine boys have an instinct of what’s right, what’s wrong. They have a moral strength to do, to do righteous duty. And in his case, in Egger’s case, it was killing communists.

 

[* Freikorps (German “Free Corps” or “Volunteer Corps” were irregular German and other European paramilitary volunteer units that existed from the 18th to the early 20th centuries. In the aftermath of World War I and during the German Revolution of 1918–19, Freikorps, consisting partially of World War I veterans, were raised as paramilitary militias. They were ostensibly mustered to fight on behalf of the government against the German communists attempting to overthrow the Weimar Republic. Wikipedia]

 

So we’re not asking anyone to do that. Not at this stage, certainly! But it’d be good to just be involved and put some stickers up. And have a good positive outlet, like physical training and being around people that are not fucking faggots!

 

[2:35:28]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, for sure. White Zealot said:

 

“Hail our people! We’re going to win!”

 

Operation Werewolf said:

 

“Support your local nationalist.”

 

And GoyBoy 1488. He always reliably sends $14.88 Superchats on Odysee. He said:

 

“Good morning, lads. Is a bottle shop a liquor store?”

 

Yeah, it is. We call liquor stores “bottle shops” in Australia.

 

Blair Cottrell: Those Odysee Superchats, they actually translate into cash. Is that the way they work?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s cool! I didn’t know that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. GoyBoy 1488 also said:

 

“Can you win before the Australian government changes the laws to shut you down? And what do you think about an episode with Warren Balogh discussing different strategy between Australia and the USA? Hail lads!”

 

Yeah, I’d be open to doing a show with Warren if he was interested. I met Warren in England last year, and he is a supreme gentleman, and so I’d be more than happy to have a conversation with him. Speaking of that crowd of people, I don’t know if Warren and Mike Penovich are still associated, but actually didn’t make a plan with Mike, also known as Mike Enoch from the TRS network, to do a stream, because he’s very clued in on the goings on with Israel. And also he’s just a very well educated anti-semite, Mike Enoch.

 

So I wanted to get him on to talk about all the shit that’s kicking off in Israel right now. It’s getting pretty hot between Israel and Hezbollah, and there’s bombings. And that’s the tensions there are escalating very seriously, and that’s potentially a powder keg that could turn into a major war.

 

And obviously that has a lot of permutations for American politics and how this election goes and the implications of how the election would go potentially on a conflict in the Middle East and so on. Because Hezbollah going to war with Israel. A lot of commentators think that Hezbollah would crush Israel. So then does America have to come in and save Israel and does that drag Iran in? There’s a lot that becomes complicated.

 

So that’s a very interesting discussion about what’s happening there, because that could end up being. I don’t think it’ll kick off in the next few weeks, but that’s an ongoing issue that could turn into a major war perhaps over the next twelve months or something. So I thought we’d do a stream talking about that because I think you would have a lot of interesting things to say. So keep an eye for that. I think maybe on the weekend we’re going to try and do that. I’ll announce it on social media.

 

The Gump said:

 

“The so-called multicultural alliance against the jews is the dumbest shit I’ve heard in a long time. Either they are delusional cowards or ill willed.”

 

Obviously, to the people promoting this:

 

“It’s a weak position. It’s not pro-White, but a humanistic, Left-wing worldview. Epic performance by Joel in that Twitter debate. No compromise.”

 

I think he’s referring to, I argued about this subject in a series of Twitter Spaces or X Spaces earlier in the week and last week. We don’t necessarily have to rehash that, but, yeah, but there’s a kind of clique of people that are promoting a kind of:

 

“Oh, Joel you guys, you’re putting too much energy into opposing non-White immigration and non-Whites in general. We should just focus all our energy on the jews!”

 

No, I don’t agree with that. And we should, like:

 

“Build, like, an alliance with these non-Whites against the jews.”

 

And I don’t think that that makes any sense for various reasons, but I’m not going to rehash the point.

 

Thomas Sewell: What I’ll quickly say is one of the fundamental issues with the groipers or the groypers is that they criticise a strategy, like ours, because it’s not liberal enough. They want us to be more liberal. But then they criticise the fact that the country’s falling apart because it’s too liberal.

 

So they’re just delusional. They think that the solution to the problem is the perfect amount of liberalism. Currently:

 

“The state, too liberal! But the Nazis, not liberal enough!”

 

And it’s like, okay, so there’s this golden liberalism. Is there somewhere in the middle that’s going to solve the problem? Well, actually, it doesn’t work like that. This liberal chaos that we’re in, it’s like a poison. And there’s not a golden amount of it’s already passed. It’s in motion. It’s in movement. We’ve moved through liberalism. It was the decline of monarchy. We’ve moved through it, and now we’re at the end state of liberalism. This really is the true liberalism, and there’s no going back to the correct amount of liberalism. So they are just delusional.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I don’t think it’s necessarily even a lot of the groypers that are the main offenders of this because they entertained the alliance with the Muslims for a time period and then have now, like, turned back upon that and readjusted. They kind of flip-flopped on that.

 

So that’s one thing, but there’s a lot of other commentators, mostly they’re just Twitter personalities and Twitter accounts that are still promoting this idea. There’s no, like, formal organisation in the world that is a multicultural, anti-jewish organisation. Like, that doesn’t exist. And I don’t think it will ever exist because I don’t think you can build a political movement on that foundation. It’s not going to be a principle of unity that you can organise as a political first principle, just simply being against jews. Like you have to be for something.

 

[2:41:24]

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly! You can’t build a movement on a negation.

 

But in saying that, Blair’s just darted. He, maybe his phone ran out of battery. But I’m gonna head off as well. It’s quarter to twelve and although I don’t work tomorrow because it’s a public holiday.

 

Joel Davis: Well, we only have a few more Superchats, start going through them.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. But I went through, I just scrolled through them. It’s like:

 

“Yeah, over 5K viewers. Awesome stuff, guys. Everyone starts off as a larper until one day, …”

 

Joel Davis: There’s a few on the Entropy as well, that’s why I’m gonna go through.

 

Thomas Sewell: They’re not really discussive. I guess you can read them out. I’m calling it a night.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. All good. See you later. GoyBoy said, … Hail Hitler, motherfucker! Jews, quote, this is a quote:

 

“Jews donate money to political groups, therefore you are being jewish. If you fund a ‘political group’, quote unquote, has got to be the most retarded popular argument I’ve ever heard. I hate spending my money, but funding our people is my favourite use for it.”

 

Yeah. I don’t know if that’s really the exact statement of their argument, but basically, yeah, there’s either one group of people who are like:

 

“We don’t need money because we’ve got guns in America and we’re going to have a civil war against the enemies!”

 

And it’s like, all right, well, civil war. If you, let’s just say that that’s what you’re gonna do. Civil wars cost money. You got to buy a lot of if you want to do a civil war. So wars are pretty much the most expensive possible fucking thing! So whether you’re gonna do a civil war, whether you’re gonna do a political party, whether you’re gonna do a lobby group, an activist organisation, some community project or combination of a bunch of these things or whatever you’re going to do, everything costs money! So at some point, White people are going to have to come together and put money into the same pot, the pro-White pot. That’s just a brute force reality. And the jews do it. The jews are putting billions into the pro-jewish pot and we’re putting nothing into the pro-White pot. And that’s one of the essential reasons why we lose.

 

And a lot of people don’t like saying that because it comes across as like they’re begging for money. I’m not saying give me money! But give someone that’s give some pro-White project money. Right? Like we need to stop putting money in together as a group. Like this is just a general statement. Like, it’s not about anything to do with me personally or anything I’m associated with necessarily.

 

But it’s the principle. It’s a basic brute force principle.

 

And also it’s important to point out, because there’s an attitude, like I said earlier, that we need rich people to put money in. No, we actually need average people to all chip in and you don’t have to put all your money in. Just like something that is affordable for everyone. If everyone does their part and chips in, that we have a lot of money there. I talked about the NSDAP funding itself like that through rank and file dues paying members. That is true. That’s one example.

 

Another example is the Australian Labor Party back when the Australian Labor Party defended White nationalism and defended the White Australia Policy, it was funded by Australian workers paying their union dues.

 

And basically, like the unions funded the Labor Party and the unions. And in those days were White nationalist unions, you know, creating some kind of White nationalist Labour union or nationalist Labour union in Australia. That’s a project that would be interesting if people want to work on that. There is the National Workers Alliance. I don’t think they’re really a union per se, but they’re getting set up. They’re nationalists and they’re getting set up down here in Victoria, putting on events. I would love to see something like that come into existence as well. I think that could be a very powerful way to build White solidarity, and get White resources together and relate to the Australian worker. Because the current union movement, the union movement is basically taken over by communists. And it’s also been taken over just by like cynical actors in Australia.

 

There’s been a lot of controversy recently about the CFMEU, which is the construction workers union. And it has like supposedly corrupt leaders and they’re engaging in extralegal methods of violence to get their way and so on. And they’re currently being taken on by elements of the government and the media. But what is basically going to happen and what is already happening is that they’re just installing ideological Marxists to fully take over these unions.

 

So it’s like, yeah, the guys that run a lot of these major unions are just like scum. Like John Setka, for example. He’s like unprincipled, piece of shit, Machiavellian type, that is just exploiting it for personal gain. But it’s like, he’s a piece of shit! But at least he’s not like a full ideological Marxist. Watch! It will be replaced with full on ideological Marxists. That will make the whole purpose of the CFMEU Aboriginal rights and fucking LGBTQ rights and refugee rights and all this nonsense, like far-Left nonsense, like the Greens Party platform will become the union platform. Watch this space.

 

Like, that kind of shit is coming. It’s already starting to be implemented. A lot of these unions, because these unions have already been thoroughly infiltrated by communists and they’re going to entrench their power over the unions. That’s going to alienate a lot of workers. A lot of the rank and file workers are nationalists are right of centre, don’t want to be paying dues into something like that. If an alternative can be built for these people that will represent their interests, their political interests more directly. The Australian worker has an interest in immigration being halted, because not only is it causing cost of living pressures, but it’s creating., … There’s a reason why big business support immigration. It’s because you bring immigrants in, it creates downward pressure on the labour market and it drives wages down. And so it’s great for business, it’s bad for workers.

 

So one of the main priorities of workers movement, the Labour union movement, if it was actually doing what it supposedly exists for, which is to defend the interests of workers, would be to oppose immigration. But they don’t do that! Because they’ve been taken over by Marxists and cynical political actors that don’t really want to swim against the political currents because they’re just there essentially siphoning off wealth for themselves and their buddies. So, yeah, anyway, I don’t want to go on too much of a rant about that.

 

[2:48:04]

 

Clive Cutler said:

 

“Howdy, lads.”

 

And J5 said:

 

“Good morning, guys from the northwest, just tuned in. Hey, what’s going on with Tom’s GiveSendGo for the White compound? Is there a new way to donate to it?”

 

So basically what happened was that GiveSendGo refunded all the money that was donated. So there was like 16 grand, I think, donated. They refunded the money to everyone who donated. Because of political pressure from the media and the government, they eventually buckled.

 

So that’s kind of gay that GiveSendGo buckled to the pressure, to be honest. So I thought, GiveSendGo, we promoted them on the stream before as one of the few platforms that kind of stood up to this kind of thing, but they cucked, so, you know, shame on them. And, yeah, so that money, if you did Chuck in, you should have got a refund. You should look into it. Maybe if you don’t know if you did get one and chase up GiveSendGo to make sure that you do get your money back because we didn’t get any of it. So we want to make sure you get your money back.

 

And we’re working on a solution. It’s difficult to figure out exactly how to receive money. We have to, to, from a legal standpoint, we’re going to have to set up some kind of not for profit and register that so we can legally do it correctly and at the same time figuring out all the payment processes and everything so that it’s secure and we don’t get de-platformed and all the rest of it.

 

So we’re currently working on that internally. Yeah, we’ll let when we get it all established. Obviously, it’s challenging and we’ve been kicked off already a bunch of platforms and the state breathed down our neck, and it’s going to try and take as much of it as tax if we don’t do something like register as a not for profit, or maybe some kind of other kind of entity that won’t just gobble up your donations in taxation, which obviously shouldn’t. Like technically, under Australian law, gifts aren’t taxable.

 

But that you know, we got to look into that legally. Castlight Commander said:

 

“Love the show, guys. Keep building from an American friend.”

 

And we love our Americans. Jake 313 said:

 

“Question on Salms [sp], yay or nay? Personal insights would be appreciated.”

 

Well, this is one that it would be better if Blair was here for, because Psalms some kind of steroid. I don’t really know anything about steroids. I’ve never done steroids. I never really researched steroids. So I’m the wrong guy. So but maybe if you want Blair’s insights on that, maybe you could Chuck it in the chat next stream or you could reach out to him on social media. Jake 313 also said, question. It’s looking like central digital currency will come to fruition with your best guess what do you think the fallout will be? How do you see the White movement, the pro-White movement adjusting or shifting or strategizing ultimately prevailing in the face of a total control system.”

 

Digital central bank currency I don’t think is as much of an imminent threat as a lot of people are saying. I have read about this to a certain extent and it seems to be getting brought in not for like conventional use, like the money that we use personally, but to manage transactions like between banks and foreign states. And so that largely won’t change very much in everyone’s everyday individual experience.

 

And a lot of the private banks are kind of pushing for it to be limited because private banks are afraid that if they Institute a digital currency mediated directly by the central bank writ large, that it will basically make private commercial banks superfluous because everyone can just get an account with the central bank essentially, and it’s all just numbers managed by a central bank. So what’s the point of having a NAB bank account, or a Commonwealth bank bank account or whatever at that point? And so their whole business model would collapse.

 

So, yeah, that’s because the amount of savings that people save, you know, offsets certain cash reserves they need to have and makes it easier for them to lend. So it would kind of fuck up their whole business model.

 

So they’re pretty powerful lobbyists. I would anticipate that they’ll probably get their way and that will kind of hold back the adoption of it writ large. Secondarily, if it was adopted, I think people get de-banked all the time. People get denied private services in the movement all the time. But I have not heard any examples of someone being denied a government service. No one’s Medicare gets cancelled, no one’s Centerlink gets cancelled or things like that, things that come directly from the state.

 

Basically, if you’re a citizen, there’s Laws that make you entitled to government services and they kind of can’t cancel you from them. If someone has any contrary examples in Australian history, bring them to me. But I’ve never heard of one.

 

[2:53:38]

 

So in a way, like, I wouldn’t be too worried about like nationalists not being able to use their digital currency or something. I don’t think they would get cancelled in such a way, but I don’t think it’s really coming anyway.

 

So I think it’s something that isn’t as big of a deal as some people make out. That’s my take. Stove one just sent a full stop. Cheers. Himmler’s glasses said:

 

“From an outsider perspective, what do you think is the biggest reason why American nationalists can’t unite. Why do so many American nationalists reject National Socialism? Hail from the Southern Saxon Active Club.”

 

That’s a complicated question. America is a very big place, first of all. And it doesn’t have the most homogenous culture because of how big it is. And the White people in America are very ethnically diverse. It’s a real kind of constellation of different Europeans. There’s a lot of different regional centres in Australia. There’s, like, two cities in Australia that have, like, almost half the total population of the country, and we have a more homogenous culture and a more ethnically homogeneous White population.

 

And so we have more consistency and contiguity, like, within the Australian people and centralisation of Australian society.

 

So it makes sense that our movement will have those characteristics. I think that’s one of the, like, that’s just like, a basic take. I think a second thing is that Americans have a different mentality to Australians when it comes to the expression of American national identity. American national identity is bound up within, like, liberal notions of freedom and rights and so on because of the way in which the American Revolution is kind of understood ideologically. And additionally, the American national identity is the most attacked, like, it’s the most destroyed. Like, the Australian national identity is more racial in what it means to people. And I think that’s partly due to the more ethnic homogeneity and the fact that we kind of stuck with the Crown.

 

And so also the fact that Australia was founded as a White nationalist nation. So in America, they teach you a kind of subversive analysis of the American Revolution about the founding fathers and how there were liberals and it was all about our freedoms. And blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

 

And so there’s a way in which, like, this national mythos can be, like, presented in such a way that it, like, reinforces the current ideological status quo in the United States, whereas in Australia, you can’t do that because they just don’t teach us about the founding of the country really in school. Because if they did, like, they would just have to basically explain how Australia was founded as a White nationalist state for White nationalist reasons. And all the founding fathers of this country were basically just concerned about securing Australia for the White race. And they’re afraid to do that.

 

They do kind of talk about how racist they were and the horrible things they did to the Aboriginals, but they’ve refrained from teaching it in too much detail, I think, because they are concerned, rightly, that if they did teach that to the Australian people, a whole bunch of people like:

 

“Hey, wait a second. That’s what our founding fathers? That’s what Australia was all about?”

 

And they would then become positively predisposed to White nationalism. So our national mythos can’t really be, like, warped and directed in such a in such a way as the American one can.

 

And so that creates a certain kind of political difficulty for the American Right, because the American Right, one side wants to kind of recapture that American national mythos and, like re racialise it. Obviously, the American founding fathers were White nationalists and they were racialists, and America was founded for the Whiteman. That’s just a fact. And America was a White supremacist state until the 1960s. In a formal sense. You know, that’s like almost, 200 years of its history. That’s just a reality. And it came into existence on the back of, initially, a race war against the Native Americans. The colonies had to fight a race war against the Native Americans. And then America then went and fought race war against the Mexicans and cleared them out of territory which they conquered and then populated with White settlers. They had, obviously, black slaves, which they then segregated once they were freed and had a kind of Whites only immigration policy.

 

So, yeah, like, America was a White supremacist state. That’s just a fact. But so there’s like, a certain School of trying to recapture that and have a based Americana school.

 

And then there’s another school that says the whole, like, American ideological identity is itself the problem. It’s leads into this liberal mythos, which is part of our deracination. And the conservatives adopted, and everything is about guns and free speech. And doesn’t matter what race you are, we all have the same freedoms as Americans. The American dream. We’re all immigrants who came here in search of freedom and prosperity. And that’s what America’s about.

 

[2:59:14]

 

And so that creates a tension in the scene that is a very strong tension, and I think divides the movement. So that very much complexifies things. Also america is such a powerful country and such a thing unto itself. Americans are more politically self referential, where Australia, being that we were kind of part of an empire, like the British Empire, and Australia was politically the same thing until the end of the Second World War. And then basically, we kind of teamed up with the American empire after the British Empire collapsed. And Australia is kind of always seen as a smaller country in terms of population. We’ve always seen, and we’re like White guys on the other side of the world, separated from the rest of the Western world. We’ve kind of looked to the rest of the Western world to understand ourselves, our identity, because we’re like an outpost of Western civilisation, an outpost of British civilisation or Anglo civilisation.

 

So we’re more receptive therefore to general ideas that are from the Western world in general. Like, we’re more receptive to taking from what the Americans are doing, what the British are doing, what the Germans have done, and so on, and taking those ideas on.

 

Whereas in America, there’s this kind of sense of:

 

“We’re the biggest, most powerful country in the world. We’re the main character of planet Earth. And so, like, why are we talking about German shit? You know, we’re America! We want to have, like, this American!”

 

So that I think that creates more hostility towards National Socialism.

 

And also America was more active in their war against the National Socialists. Like, for Australia, like, yeah, we fought the Nazis in World War Two. We fought the Nazis kind of on behalf of the British Empire.

 

But the main story of World War Two for us was fighting the Japanese. And I know that was a major aspect of the story for the Americans, but a very large part of America’s, like, kind of sense of itself is:

 

“We beat the Nazis! We defeated the Germans!”

 

And so on. That’s like a big deal to in America. And we were just kind of going along with that. So that isn’t as bound up like defeating the Nazis isn’t as bound up into our identity.

 

So I think that makes us more receptive, I think, to National Socialist, all these things mixed together, and also is part of the reason why America’s movement is so fractured.

 

Also, the American conservative movement of, is kind of more dynamic. It’s more interesting because of the primary system, entryism is more attractive to nationalists to get involved with the American conservative. Where in Australia, like, our conservative movement, it’s like there’s larger barriers to entry. It’s less interesting, it’s less dynamic. There isn’t as much of a way for nationalists to feel that they can really do much with Australia’s conservative movement. So a large portion of the American scene is very focused upon conventional electoral politics and the whole Trump thing and so on. In Australia, there isn’t an equivalent to that. So anyway, I think that would probably answer your question.

 

Based Henry George said:

 

“On the search for inspiring leaders and impressed on that front by what the work of you boys from Australia. Just wanted to support the show. Cheers from America.”

 

Thanks man. I appreciate that.

 

And I think we have, White Zealot said:

 

“To ensure financial transparency, you should create a DAO on the Ethereum blockchain. And the leaders would propose and vote on expenditure proposals on the DAO, which is public. The proposal passes, the funds are transferred to the design executor.”

 

Yeah, I don’t know. I don’t think we would probably use that. We might do a more kind of like conventional old school way that would still have transparency internally, but a more conventional kind of paperwork old school way.

 

Bethtion 1 one said:

 

“Cash is king.”

 

I think that must have been in response to what I was saying about how jews put money in as a collective and so we don’t have organisations that can compete with the organisations that defend jewish interest as a collective, as a White collective. 65 Stoney said:

 

“Over five thousand live viewers. Great show!”

 

And they threw like a little Roman. Cozytion Clips said:

 

“Everyone starts off as a larper until one day you’re not. Onward to victory!”

 

That’s true. Everything starts as larp and you larp your way into a position where it’s no longer a larp.

 

But yeah, I think that’s all the Superchats. Thanks for all the Superchats tonight. Thanks for watching the show. And yeah, it’s great that we got Twitter now as another option to broadcast the show.

 

As I said at the beginning, it makes me feel great that about a year ago I get banned from YouTube and now the show is getting way more views than it ever did on YouTube, on Rumble and Twitter. So that’s fucking awesome! It’s great that the online environment has changed and you don’t have to be on YouTube anymore to do a show like this and get a decent viewership.

 

So anyway, we’re going to end the stream there. Thanks for watching. Hope you enjoyed the show this week.

 

As I said:

 

“I’ll probably do a stream this weekend, maybe Saturday night US time, Sunday morning Australia time. I will confirm the exact time it’ll be with, as I said, Mike Enoch, aka, Mike Penovich. We’ll mostly be talking about the Israel question because I think, as I said, it’s getting very interesting. There’s a lot to analyze there.

 

So I think it’ll be important to put out some content on that. So tune in then if you’re interested in that subject. It’ll be on Rumble, Odysee, and X, as usual. And yeah, see you all next time.

 

[3:05:32]

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 9/28/2024 = 30)

BradC1988
1 day ago
Australia for the White Man! o/
11 likes

› Show 1 reply
Rockwell1488Pierce
1 day ago
Follow Joel and Blair on twitter, Tom on (telegram)! https://x.com/joeldavisx https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell https://x.com/b_cottrell89
6 likes

vigilantejustice23
1 day ago
You can’t label working-class women as dysgenically-tied to a cycle of poverty without saying the same about working class men. This is one example as to you may be coming across as anti-white woman to others. Working class white women are just as white as working class white men. I am not a member of the working class, but when you say things that make it seem like you want to disown your own kin, it compromises our very important sense of racial solidarity. I see you guys as my brothers. We share the same Kelto-Nordic blood. But the question is: do you in turn see me as your sister? I am not trying to nitpick as you guys have done so much amazing work, and I’ll be grateful whether or not you consider my feedback. I will continue to support you guys because you’re my brothers. You’re right that we need to weed out the weakest links within our race. But if there’s anything you guys have taught me, it’s that white solidarity is more important now than ever. We don’t need some kind of gender divide compromising our solidarity and sense of kinship. Many white women are looking for a “home” where they feel like they’re part of the in-group. We are essential to the survival of our race, just as you are. I think we could make huge strides if it’s clearly communicated to white women that you guys are on our side and are fighting for our interests.
5 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
Carnierge
Supporter
1 day ago
What women believe doesn’t matter, nor should it. As a movement, trying to pander to women in a way that curtails the message to make it more palatable to women and their sensibilities is futile and naive. Especially considering women have had decades of programming by feminism and other andjacent ideologies, they are essentially self emulating on the pyre of modernity in defiance to their own self ruin. In the pursuit of appeasing them you temper your own stances from being as strong as they need to be, and you fail to capture the ire of women anyway. Men need to be men and that means making women unhappy — an inevitable, unavoidable reality, and in fact necessary. Women who are amongst the underclass and destroyed working classes are impossible to help see reason, but the men are capable to a degree. That is the difference, and a very real difference we must not ignore. How are you going to make a chain smoking single mother of 4 to 3 different fathers see the error in her ways. You won’t. The state supports her decisions and society reinforces her worldview. These women can bring through generations of imbeciles through their mate selection and rearing methods. Men do not possess that kind of societal weapon of mass destruction. “I think we could make huge strides if it’s clearly communicated to white women that you guys are on our side and are fighting for our interests.” How? By saying abortion is wrong, something that would cause mass outrage as the overwhelming majority of women on both sides of the political spectrum support it? By saying women are incapable of leading on account of their inherent nature and these duties should be left to men. By saying women’s purpose is motherhood and should be done as young as possible so as to maximise their window of fertility? All of these things are absolutely necessary to be said, none of them would go down well with modern women. This is why, respectfully, we need to not give a fuck what women think.
0 likes

Carnierge
Supporter
1 day ago
The fact that you would question them fighting for your interests enough, that they should strive to prove themselves more to women than they do, based on the fact that you don’t feel they speak in the right tone or go to the right extent in their messaging to be adequately women friendly or female oriented just proves my point in the matter.
0 likes

katana17
1 day ago
Last week’s show’s transcript: [Joel Davis – The Purpose of Street Activism, the Principle of Race and the Politics of Will – Sep 19, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/09/20/joel-davis-the-purpose-of-street-activism-the-principle-of-race-and-the-politics-of-will-sep-19-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the following: • Now hosting a live stream on Twitter/X for the first time. • Recent activism and interviews, including one with a young Australian influencer/YouTuber, Max Caruso. • They criticize Nick Fuentes’ views
on their street activism tactics. • Argue for the importance of militant street activism to recruit and inspire supporters. • The need for white nationalism and racial loyalty: “We are one racial family with one shared destiny and the survival of our race.” • Criticize attempts at political alliances with non-white groups. • Discuss recent Australian political events, including a politician’s comments on Abo “Welcome” ceremonies. • Argue that White people need to “stop White flighting and start fighting back” against immigration. • Criticize conservative politics and argue for more radical action. • The differences between American and Australian politics and nationalism, “White nationalism was the product of struggle in Australia.” • Criticize Muslim immigration and Islamic views. • Importance of aesthetics and looking “cool” in political activism. “Looking cool is actually really more important than almost anything else that you do in politics.” • The need to appeal to women supporters. • Discuss historical figures like Hitler and philosophical concepts related to their ideology. • Criticize “multiracial alliance retards” and argue for racial separatism. • Discuss the concept of freedom and its relation to racial identity. “Freedom wasn’t this abstract concept, therefore, of you’re free because people leave you alone. … more
3 likes

Delete
whitehonkymonkey
1 day ago
5ill the whiteman . ramp up the message,we might get the reaction we need.
3 likes

MelancholyMonkey
1 day ago
You guys are three of this Yank’s very favorite honkies. (Honky is American slang for Whites, and was coined by blacks in the mid-20th Century.)
3 likes

FLmetalhead
1 day ago
I’d gladly donate if you set that up
2 likes

BradC1988
1 day ago
You guys giving shit to the fat cunt paedo who’s a lego enthusiast was pretty funny. The fattie also needs prison time.
2 likes

kirodarkpaw
13 hours ago
I think that the ONLY reason more people are not supporting white nationalists with monthly subscriptions is simply because it’s too dangerous for them to do so. Enter a credit card and they out themselves, go on a government list, and then get their bank cancelled. I know that you guys have done WAY more than that, but most people find that terrifying. I think there is a lot of money and support that WANTS to come your way, they just aren’t sure how to securely do so.
2 likes

JoeyBato3
1 day ago
Jew tube
1 like

KingChun
1 day ago
“But the Jews are without any doubt the strongest, most tenacious, and purest race now living in Europe.” “And for this, it might perhaps be useful and reasonable to expel the anti-Semitic ranters out of the country.”- Nietzsche Beyond Good and Evil pg 251. Has anyone else woken up from the Judeo-Nietzsche psyop?
1 like

lapalmax73
1 day ago
The more people know you guys the more people know you guys! I am getting on age wise how can an old bastard like me assist!
1 like

Kroninn
SubSupporter
21 hours ago
that’s a great idea, about the “Doner Class”. I think that’s essential to build a resilient foundation to opporate from.
1 like

Nationlessnationalist
1 day ago
hail from the heart of the GAE. thanks for what you guys do.
0 likes

WhitesArePigskin
1 day ago
Australia belong to Indians. and remember Whites are Pigskin and they smell very bad like a died stinky pig
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
WhiteBloke
22 hours ago
Lol the only place for you subhuman pajeets is in India. You stinky cunts drink cows piss and eat their shit while we have them butchered and eat their delicious steaks. Don’t you have some uberjeets orders to deliver on your scooter anyway?!
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
WhitesArePigskin
19 hours ago
Keep crying piggyskinboi we will replace u even in europe. ur time is over. ur jewish masters don’t want u anymore haha.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
White88White
19 hours ago
Great show.
0 likes

WillyPete9
18 hours ago
I wouldnt rule out the possibility of a war kicking off and suspending the US election. Harris becomes de facto President & Zog gets what he wants.
0 likes

BeamRider101
17 hours ago
Since when has there been a “speaker’s corner” in Sydney and I’ve lived there all my life, so it’s setup to be an easy to target location. That’s the first time I’ve heard of a speakers corner.
0 likes

Nationlessnationalist
13 hours ago
great show
0 likes

DontDrinkZeeKoolAid
8 hours ago
We need that stream with Mike Enoch soon, Joel!
0 likes

augustonvenus
6 hours ago
1:37:40 what a non sequitur, blair is a crack up
0 likes

vigilantejustice23
1 day ago
Also, if race-mixing women are dysgenic and the trash is taking itself out, how about race-mixing men? White men race-mix more often than white women do. By this logic, more white men need to be taken out than white women….
-2 likes

‹ Hide 3 replies
hadefo
1 day ago
check wonder.cdc.gov/natality-expanded-current.html “children born to white parents 2016-2019” racemix for women is 12.7 racemix for men is 11.8 so it’s false men racemix more, but slightly less
2 likes

StreamAddict
1 day ago
“White men race-mix more often than white women do.” Nope. Except for some yellow fever among the men, the mixing with backs is nearly 100 percent women cuz men find black women completely disgusting, its basically beastiality. Not sure of the exact figures but I’ll bet $6,000,000 most of the race mixing is women, at least with the blacks anyway, which is arguably the worst form of it. There just needs to be laws with harsh punishments put in place, it shouldnt be left up to the individual to decide to create mongrel enemies for us all to have to deal with later, whether women or men, but at that point we’d already have enough power that there wouldnt be any non whites left in the country to race mix with anyway lol.
0 likes

Carnierge
Supporter
1 day ago
The white men who mix with Asian women are typically high IQ types, and increasingly higher status. Granted many of these types are soy nerds, but they are apart of the capable and productive classes. The white women who bring through a generation of disenfranchised mulattoes are largely dysgenic in the first place. If white men were just as willing to race mix as white women, there wouldn’t be such a thing as incels.
0 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

/>

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live. We are live. It is the 19th of September 2024. We’re actually live on Twitter. Live on X for the first time.

 

Finally rigged it. I don’t know why I didn’t start streaming these streams on Twitter earlier because, yeah, it’s just like an obviously good platform. I saw some other nationalists that have been streaming up there and they got crazy numbers of views and they get a shitload of, … I remember when I did streams with Elijah Schaffer, he streamed it on X as well and it got heaps of views. We’re going to stream every show on Twitter now.

 

So you can watch the show on Twitter, but if you’re already accustomed to watching it on Rumble, stay on Rumble because the Rumble’s got a good live chat.

 

So you can stay on the live chat on Rumble. And also we’re on Odysee. But yeah, you can watch on Twitter. And the replay will be available. I think it automatically re-uploads as a replay. So we’ll see. Hopefully there’s no technical difficulties this time, but we’re into the show. Tom actually going to join us. He’s just turned his webcam off because he’s smashing down his late dinner and it’d be a little bit uncouth for him to finish it on stream.

 

So we’re going to start off with me and Blair. Blair, how you doing this evening?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m good, man. I’m just trying to figure out how I change my settings on X to see quote, unquote, “sensitive content” because I just reshared this stream on X. Really excited to be streaming on X, by the way. First time we’ve done it, as Joel said, so should really soak up some new viewers, which is great. But how do I change my settings so I can see sensitive content? Like, does anyone have any instructions for me?

 

Joel Davis: I’ve got all these blocks on my account. Anything that goes on my account is classified as, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it sucks!

 

But look, someone sent me an instruction on how to do that. We won’t get into it on the stream to divert the conversation that way, but someone tell me how to do that because I’m a little bit boomer tech with this stuff.

 

But yeah, I’m going well, really busy. I’m working as much as I can to make a bit of money for an endeavour of mine that’s coming up next month. But other than that, yeah, man, I’m just keeping an eye on current affairs.

 

Our mutual friend Thomas Sewell caught up with upcoming young Australian influencer today. So we might talk a little bit about that. I saw that you’ve been getting into a bit of back and forth with Fuentes, so that’ll be interesting to get your take on what’s happening there. But how you feeling Tom Sewell. What’s up?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I’m great. Just had a busy afternoon, but glad to be on the show. I just watched over that video. I thought the young guy did a good job. You can tell he’s very afraid of censorship. So we did, like, a half an hour interview, and he put up maybe four minutes of it, and the rest is just him at 7/11 being casually racist and funny.

 

So I have high hopes for the young man. It’s a shame that that generation’s kind of got a lot of brain rot. But you just got to roll with the punches.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ll just show it here on the screen.

 

So this is the video. Tom just got interviewed by this guy, Max Caruso on YouTube. He just uploaded the video about an hour ago. And, yeah, he does these things where he goes and interviews gangsters and different people. And he decided to interview Tom.

 

So I haven’t actually seen it yet because he just uploaded it. But after Tom went and did the interview, he came to training, and it sounded like he had a good time. And it was a lot of fun. So should be some fun content.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, it’s sad he’s so concerned about censorship, he left out a lot of the funny stuff.

 

So he would ask a question and I would just nonchalantly sort of answer it in a way that would just be normal in our scene. But for someone that’s very, very neutral politically and not exposed to our scene, he just found everything that I was saying hilarious in a kind of not in a nervous way, necessarily, but I think that generation are so divorced from just truth, just stern truth. They’re used to people, like, beating around the bush, and then they can’t even say faggot at school or like, there’s a lot of things that they don’t expect people to say.

 

So when I was explaining things the way that I sometimes do, I try to keep it as short and as succinct as possible because I knew his audience would have a short attention span. And he left out. I got him laughing quite a bit. Like, he left out a lot of the gold. Like he said to me at one point:

 

“I just always kind of I understand what you’re saying, but I grew up with this idea that Australia was for everyone.”

 

And I said to him:

 

“For everyone?”

 

And he was like:

 

“Yeah, you know, we’re multicultural. Just everyone can come here.”

 

And I said to him:

 

“If everyone is Australian, then what does Australian mean?”

 

And he just went really blank and kind of looked at the ground awkwardly.

 

And I was like:

 

“If every colour is red, then what colour is red?”

 

And he kind of just had, like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s a great analogy. Wow, that’s great!

 

[05:09]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, he just had this, like, windows 95 kind of like loading screen or like Apple loading screen. It’s like, do, do, do! Yeah, he was just like, … And then even the cameraman started laughing. And it’s sad that he left stuff like that out because that, to me, is really funny, confronting logic that they’ve never been exposed to as young people. And, yeah, there was another time where he sort of asked the same question again in a different way to get a different answer.

 

And I was like:

 

“All right, I’ll say something even dumber because., …”

 

Well, not dumber, but I’ll say something that maybe would be more controversial or more able to get on YouTube than what I just said. Cause it makes too much sense.

 

And I said to him:

 

“So you’re saying Belay [sp] is just as Australian as me?”

 

And he just lost it! He was like:

 

“Did you just click at me?”

 

Like:

 

“Yeah.”

 

“Well, they can’t. They’re cannibals, aren’t they? From the Congo, like, Belay.”

 

And it was a good time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I can tell he wants to make something of himself, this guy. You know, he’s probably trying to protect his brand somewhat, as a lot of you know, upcoming influencers try to do.

 

Joel Davis: But hopefully, … I said, be very careful.

 

Thomas Sewell: I said, be very careful about getting a YouTube strike if you want to make it with what you’re doing. Be very careful with your interview with me. Like, don’t put too much up. Be very careful.

 

Blair Cottrell: As you know, Tom, like, YouTube strikes, they don’t have to give you strikes. They can just delete you! If he’s seen to be platforming someone who’s like a significant or considered some sort of threat to national security, that’s what Intelligence will say. YouTube will just take it, take his account down completely. So it’ll be interesting to see if it stays up. Like, he’s in dangerous territory. I think he doesn’t understand how dangerous the territory is in censorship terms.

 

But, yeah, it’ll be interesting to see if it stays up. And I’m glad it was fun. I’m going to watch it. I haven’t watched it yet. I watched it on mute while Joel and I were warming up just to get perspective of the vibe. And it looked like good fun.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. It’d be interesting to give it a watch after this, but in the meantime, we’ve got a stream to do. And there’s some subjects I really wanted to cover this evening. And the catalyst for it was., … Yeah, like, I got into a little bit of an argument with Nick Fuentes on Twitter, but it was an amicable argument. I just basically restated my criticism of the idea that we could form some kind of alliance politically with Muslims or other non-White factions that would be reliable in any way because they have completely different interests. Like, White people have specific existential interests, other groups have different interests. Maybe they converge on a particular issue.

 

But as the news cycle shifts, as things happen, eventually we find ourselves on opposite sides on another issue and the alliance breaks down. That’s why race needs to be the principle, because that provides consistency. There is always a pro-White position that is consistent on every issue, and we have blood loyalty to one another. We are one racial family with one shared destiny and the survival of our race. We’re being attacked as a race, and the survival of our race is ultimately dependent upon our ability to reassert ourselves as a race. And no one else is going to come and save us but ourselves. And that’s just the reality. I see the political reality.

 

So I see any of this attempt at extending the political definition to include non-Whites, as just a waste of time, a waste of energy, fundamentally unstable. And it might seem like it’s a good idea temporarily, but it will always end up kind of falling apart in time. So I reiterated my point on that. And we had a little bit of a back and forth, particularly over the Israel-Palestine thing, because obviously, fuck Israel! Obviously we stand opposed to the jews and we want Israel cut off. I think we would actually want the jews expelled from all Western countries and Israel cut off completely.

 

But having said that, putting all of this political energy, and this isn’t something that I necessarily accused Fuentes of doing, but a lot of other people in the scene did this to excess, of putting way too much political energy, I think, into defending Palestine and focusing upon the pro-Palestine movement, which is led by brown people, brown immigrants in the West, in alliance with communists. Two enemy factions of us! Putting all of this energy into the pro-Palestine movement to the point that what are we getting out of that? They don’t have any sympathy for us. They don’t do anything for White people. In fact, communists and browns that make up this core coalition, they’re directly opposed to us and our direct political enemies.

 

So I’m not going to put much political energy into defending the pro-Palestine cause. I’m quite happy to criticise Israel, to attack Israel, to attack jewish influence. But from a pro-White perspective, from the perspective that White people shouldn’t be funding or supporting this foreign state, why do we go to war in Iraq for Israel’s interests? Obviously, it’s because of jewish infiltration and subversion of western governments. And not one White soldier should have given his life to defend Israel’s interests. I mean, that’s insane!

 

[10:24]

 

So obviously we agree on that point, but I think the criticism should be from a pro-White standpoint. We should criticise jews on the basis of how jewish power adversely affects White people, not how it adversely affects other groups. So that we remain entrenched in asserting our particular interests as a race and as a people. The retort was:

 

“Okay, but it doesn’t necessarily have to be reduced to that. All of these liberal and Islamic critics of Israel are still putting negative attention on the jews, and this is waking people up to the problem with the jews and so on.”

 

And I said:

 

“I don’t really think that’s the case.”

 

For me, there’s plenty of anti-Israel sentiment in the community. It’s a totally normal position. At least half of society is pro-Palestine, at least in most Western countries pro-Palestinian sentiment is actually higher than pro-Israel sentiment. There’s a lot of celebrities that are pro-Palestinian. The entire Left basically is pro-Palestinian in the rank and file. Obviously, the jews have captured the major centr-Left parties and keep them kind of in a more neutral position on the issue, leaning more towards the pro-Israel position.

 

But ultimately, the average Leftist is pretty anti-Israel. So does that mean that they’re anti-jewish? No, because they criticise Israel from a racial egalitarian perspective. The perspective that:

 

“The problem with Israel is that it’s a settler colonial, western White supremacist state.”

 

And they use basically the same criticism of Israel that they used to criticise the White settlement of Australia or the White settlement of the United States or Canada or whatever, and to de-legitimize that.

 

And so I don’t want to play into that framework. Because as a White Australian, that directly undermines me as well! I mean, I’m against Israel because it’s jewish! Not because it’s settler, colonialist or because it’s supremacist or any of these other things.

 

So anyway, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel, if you had to pick a side, what side would it be?

 

Joel Davis: I would pick Palestine, because fuck jews! But I don’t have to pick a side necessarily. Like, I picked the side of the Whiteman, because I’m White. I pick my own side.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Let me be clear. Let me be clear. Like, if Israel just incinerates a million Palestinians with incendiary bombs tonight, I don’t care!

 

And I also don’t care if, what are they, Hamas and Hezbollah? I don’t care if they gas a million jews tomorrow. I don’t care! I’m an Australian racist. I don’t care! My only concern would be, okay, how are we going to develop, build up and defend our national existence against these psychopaths killing each other over there? That’s what concerns me. Am I wrong?

 

Joel Davis: I mean, yeah. It makes sense to only be concerned with your own people, as opposed to worried about a foreign conflict. The only reason it’s our problem is because the jews are in our country, making it our problem through infiltrating our government and sending our resources, and most particularly American resources, to the aid of Israel and getting us involved in their conflict.

 

And then also, then we get the Palestinian immigrants brought into our countries as well, and that becomes other Islamic immigrants in general.

 

And so then we’ve got a pro-Palestine movement and a pro-zionist movement clashing in Australian politics and in all Western political dynamics, when it shouldn’t be our fucking problem! There shouldn’t be any jews or Palestinians or Muslims in any of our countries! And it should just be some weird foreign conflict that you read about on like, page 30 of the newspaper or something. It shouldn’t be something that we have to care about.

 

So anyway, that was the argument. So then a lot of people kept Superchatting, I think Nick’s show this week, asking him about me. And there was a response that he gave. I thought we could watch it and react to it. Not because it’s a big deal, the personal attack, but more because he then attacked street activism. He attacked basically our organisation and basically said:

 

“Oh, what’s the point of marching in the street in black? And so on?”

 

And so I thought it would be good to respond to it, to kind of explain, what our actual philosophy is behind doing it. Because this is something that is important, I think, to reiterate. Like, obviously, it’s a major part of what we do. So we’re going to explain why we do it.

 

But anyway, I’ll play the clip. I got the clip here. I’ll play the clip and we’ll analyze it’s actually a nine minute clip. I don’t know if I want to play the whole thing, it would take ages.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ll do my best to pay attention.

 

Joel Davis: Sorry?

 

Thomas Sewell: The most important part is the last section, so maybe play the start and play the end.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ll play the final clip.

 

Superchat: Skip sent $10. Could you elaborate on your thoughts about Joel Davis? The wignat circles he’s now a part of seem to always criticise you, which is disappointing. Always saw him as a potential Australian version of you. Would you be down to debate him in Twitter space?

 

Nick Fuentes: Well, the truth is, it’s kind of irrelevant, because he lives in Australia.

 

So I just don’t really care that much about, … Look, what does Australia have to do with us? That guy’s not American, so what does he have to do with us?

 

Joel Davis: I mean, then he proceeds to talk about me for nine minutes, so it must have something to do with you.

 

But anyway, I’ll try and skip to the point at which he talks about street activism.

 

[15:55]

 

Nick Fuentes: We wouldn’t do that at a rally. We wouldn’t do that at a thing. [word unclear] reform. I don’t know what the model is there. Like lowbrow, … I don’t know. I don’t think we’re ever going to. And it’s because of this charismatic leader you’re behind who he’s apparently in love with. It’s like, yeah, I don’t know. So are you really committed? Are you really serious about your core convictions if you’re changing them all the time?

 

Joel Davis: So, okay, so this part, he kind of criticised me, saying that I flip flopped on Christianity.

 

I started out online as kind of more of an intellectual, doing intellectual content, like theory cell content. I wasn’t doing activism then.

 

Blair Cottrell: I can’t picture that! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. I wasn’t doing activism then, but basically I started out doing that kind of content. But at that time, my worldview wasn’t a million miles away from where it is now. I was a kind of Nietzschean, imperialist, racialist at that time. And that kind of my guiding kind of philosophy.

 

Then I went through a phase of trying to give Christianity a chance. I was raised a Christian. I turned away from the faith in my teens, and I tried to give it a chance again as an adult. And I ended up giving Catholicism a chance. I was raised a Protestant, and I was kind of I couldn’t go back to that. So I thought maybe I had the wrong brand. Maybe if I go back to the original brand, if I go back to Coke rather than Pepsi, it might taste better.

 

And I gave it a proper chance. I really did. That was a sincere thing. I don’t really see how that indicates that I lack conviction, to give a religion a chance, then ultimately, I just don’t. I lost my. I don’t have faith in the Church. I don’t think the Church is a legitimate institution.

 

But this whole time, I was a White nationalist. I never was nothing racially focused. I was never not pro-White. I’ve been pretty consistent in that core principle.

 

So the time in which I was a Catholic, I was a White nationalist, I was a Holocaust revisionist or denier, whatever you want to call it. You know, I talked about World War Two. I talked about the Nazis in positive terms. I defended Hitler. So it isn’t like this is like a million miles away from [chuckling] what I was doing before. I just basically had a religious phase. But he’s kind of defining that as flip flopping, like saying that what I’m doing now, I don’t have conviction.

 

I decided to get involved in activism. I surveyed the Australian scene. This is the only project that I thought was interesting and that was going anywhere in a positive way. So I decided to embrace this particular project. It aligned with my convictions and with my personality.

 

So that’s why I’m doing what I’m doing. Apparently, that’s flip flopping. Anyway.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. It seems like a pretty standard process of development. It’s not really flip flopping. Yeah, but that’s just my take.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I mean, maybe Hitler was right when Hitler said that you shouldn’t get involved in politics until you’re 30, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Don’t say that! You’re not even 30 yet. Right?

 

So you’re still, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Maybe he was correct about that. Maybe I should have, like, finished, … Because now I’m kind of in my. I think I’ve finished my kind of maturing. I’ve kind of arrived. And maybe I should have waited.

 

But at the same time, I don’t really regret my previous involvements, because, as I said, it’s not like I haven’t been pro-White or, basically agitating for the same things the whole time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Tom and I got started early too. We got started early. And I don’t think either of us regret it. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! And you guys got started in a position that in now as well. Like, you tried a project. It wasn’t exactly the right formula. Like, you had some success, but it wasn’t exactly the right formula. Went back to the drawing board, reassessed. You have to learn on the job! And I feel like, similar to me. I tried some things out earnestly and then went back to the drawing board and revised it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. I actually had conversation with Jim Salem, who at the time was called the “grandfather of Australian White nationalism”. When I was 21 and I was first getting involved in public activism, and I went up to “The Bunker”, as they call it, in Sydney in Tempe, and I said to him that quote, I said:

 

“You know, Hitler described that a man wasn’t politically mature until 30. And should I sort of just keep observing and keep an eye on things and keep developing myself and then maybe emerge as a political commentator, or a political leader, or a political activist at 30?”

 

And he said:

 

“No, no, there’s a lot that I disagree with Hitler on. That’s ridiculous! Alexander the Great defeated the Persians when he was 21 years old!”

 

At one of the battles. Can’t remember the battle, but he mentioned the battle specifically.

 

And, I mean, that is slightly different in the sense that he was born the son of a king. So that kind of helps get your political career up and running at 21! But it was a fair point. It was a fair point. I think he said something like, he’d conquered, like, a third of the known world by 28.

 

And so, yeah, I think Joel’s comments are fair. I think Nick’s comments on this, especially, are unfair. This idea, I can’t consider Joel someone that’s flip flopped on any of these issues. That’s the thing about being a political commentator, like Nick or like Joel or like ourselves, we make a thousand takes over the course of two years or three years.

 

So you can selectively pick, you know, anything and put them in distinction to each other or play them at the same time as each other. And it can appear that someone’s flip flopped on their views. And that’s not true. That’s not consistent with what Joel’s development has been like. And anyone to try to go back to their religious roots and explore Catholicism and then say:

 

“Well, that’s not for me.”

 

You know, that’s fine and noble. And obviously, Nick is personally affected by that. Nick’s a Catholic, isn’t he? So he would see that as some sort of apostasy. So that’s a personal dig. Like, he feels that’s an attack on his faith, that’s an attack on his convictions.

 

And then the other comments, the what’s it called? Not homophobic. What is it? The homoeroticism or whatever that he’s trying to bring up is just more of a projection of his own psyche. He’s the one with the gay accusations.

 

[22:36]

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh! Oh!

 

Thomas Sewell: This is the truth! Like when there’s been multiple occasions where his tabs have been open in the background and he said that he’s been hacked. Everyone’s defended him and protected him, but this is the stuff that’s been smeared against him and his associations with Catboy Cammy, who, like, would suck dildos on livestream. And he was friends with this guy and he did sleepovers with Catboy Cammie. That’s fucking weird! So he’s got some dubious associations, and he’s made many dubious comments.

 

And then to be involved in a nationalist organisation that has established leadership, that has established figureheads, it’s such a strange take that Nick has that to join an organisation must mean that you’re homosexually attracted to the leader. Is that why Nick isn’t involved in an organisation? Because he would have he would have to love big daddy Trump to join the Republican Party, or he’s got some strange, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe there’s no American. Maybe no American organize leaders are hot enough for Nick? [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe. Maybe.

 

But, yeah, it’s very immature. And he shouldn’t be punching Right. He is to the Left of us. He shouldn’t be punching Right.

 

But anyway, I’ll let you continue.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I don’t have a problem with him expressing criticism of my views on whatever subject.

 

But, I mean, I’ve always been a friend to Nick. I’ve defended him from some people that I think have given him unfair criticism and personal attacks many times in the past, because I’m a pretty fair and reasonable person.

 

So it’s kind of weird to be like, yeah, I don’t think anyone really thinks I’m a faggot. You know, that’s not really a problem that I have to deal with. So it’s kind of weird for him to go there, but anyway.

 

Nick Fuentes: You bounce right out of it. And now you’re a NatSoc, and it’s because of this charismatic leader you’re behind, who’s apparently in love with. It’s like, yeah, I don’t know.

And the whole thing’s just kind of like, it’s too, like, lowbrow. Like, I don’t know. I don’t think we’re ever going to have political Reform because a bunch of meatheads dress in all black and yell the n-word, throwing up Nazi salutes. Like, I don’t think that’s ever actually going to lead to political reform.

 

Joel Davis: By the way, this idea that I don’t think we’ve ever, like, yelled the n-word in at a public rally because there isn’t any black people really, in Australia to speak of I mean, there’s a few, but it’s not that relevant. So I don’t even know what he’s talking about there.

 

I mean, yeah, we do pretty, like hardcore rallies that can be kind of aggressive and militant, but, yeah, and even if we did yell, the n-word, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Political upheaval is a collection of activities that all sort of have that collaborative effect. It’s not like yeah, a bunch of guys protesting isn’t the only reason political change happens, but it might be integral in some way, you know?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, the reason why we go into the street is, there’s multiple reasons. But one reason is because it provokes a reaction from the media, from the political class. I mean, the last few times that we’ve done rallies.

 

So the last rally that we did, we had the “Fuck Off! We’re Full!” rally where we confronted the refugee encampment. We forced Dvir Abramovich to go onto the news and a bunch of politicians to go into the news and argue about it. And Dvir Abramovich, by the way, is the Australian Jonathan Greenblatt, basically for the American audience. Like, he’s the jew that runs our version of the ADL [Anti-Defamation League].

 

He had to go on the news and explain “Great Replacement Theory” to the Australian people. And that, like that’s what we’re motivated by. We think that, like, White people are being replaced and this crazy conspiracy theory, and that’s what we’re there for.

 

And so that was brilliant! And the clips from that rally, by my count, of everything that I saw, accumulated at least 5 million views online on TikTok, on Twitter.

 

And the rally we did before that, where we, the ‘Mass Deportations Now’ rally that also got millions and millions of views online. It went all over the media sthings we have done in Sydney and Melbourne and so on, where the prime minister has had to come out into the media and condemn us or the premier of various states, like top level politicians, leaders from the jewish community and so on. So we provoke a reaction, to then get the Australian people to become aware of us. And we’ve become somewhat of a brand in Australian politics. So there’s a meta-political aspect to that.

 

But at the same time, there is also a recruitment aspect. Like we are showing ourselves to the people to say:

 

“Hey, come and join us!”

 

And every time we do a rally, we get a spike in recruits. Ultimately, we don’t have anywhere near enough people. But you’ve got to start somewhere.

 

Our idea is, well, if we keep doing this and we keep recruiting, in a few years time there’s going to be thousands of us. In a few more years time, maybe tens of thousands, and then it has a completely different connotation. Now we are literally mobilising seriously large quantities of White men in every city in Australia in a very prominent and powerful way that then becomes very interesting politically. But you have to start somewhere.

 

[28:17]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s applying pressure and it’s forcing the establishment to react to what you’re doing, rather than you always having to react to what the establishment is doing. Right. So it puts you in a powerful position. And sure, there’s consequences, but that’s the fun of it, [chuckling] in my opinion.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s also about a kind of dramatisation. So it’s about showing that there’s one thing to have ideas and to promote ideas, but it’s another thing to go and stand in the street in a militant way in representation of those ideas. Because what that does is it shows that there is now an actor to support. There is a group, there is a movement, there is a representation of those ideas in a concrete formation of men. And, yeah, you could say:

 

“Well, it’s only 20 guys, 50 guys, 100 guys. Is that such a big deal?”

 

As I said, we’ve got to start somewhere. But we managed to get the prime minister of the country to talk about it, the top jews in the country to freak out about it all over the mainstream media and get millions of people to watch clips of it on the Internet. Many of the comments of which are massively supportive, by the way. You know, we’re creating a, we’re doing a performance art, basically. It’s a performance art with an audience of millions that gets a reaction out of the entire political elite of our country that has thousands and thousands, if not tens of thousands of people, sometimes even more, showing their support to us online.

 

So that’s a powerful act. There’s something there that you have to acknowledge in objective metrics.

 

Additionally, again, it’s a beginning point. We believe that the only way in which we can take on the system is ultimately to get White men organised in large quantities, explicitly around their race. And you could do that by basically getting no media attention and having like no public presence whatsoever! And you could see how many men you recruit and you could see how far you get and how much influence you have, or you could go and take on all the negative aspects of that, which is pressure from the feds, pressure from the state, pressure from the media.

 

But at the same time, you’re there, you’re in front of the people, you’re providing a concrete option. We believe that if we grow to a certain size, that hundreds of thousands of people that already sympathize with us in the Australian community, that so many of them will come and join our ranks once we get to a certain size, because they will see that:

 

“Wow! This is actually going somewhere. This is a movement I can believe in!”

 

It’s really hard to get people to believe in something when it’s a small amount of people or when it’s just an idea.

 

But when you start to show there’s thousands of men that have this idea that are going to stand together, united in this particular place at this particular time, then all of a sudden it becomes something to actually believe in. And you’re believing now in a people, in a group of people, as opposed to just a concept. Because there’s millions of Australians that the concepts of White nationalism will appeal to, but they’ve got no concrete people to go and support. They’ve got no concrete leadership to believe in, to galvanise around that idea. They just simply go:

 

“Oh, yeah, it sucks that immigration is happening and it sucks what’s happening to White people, but what am I going to do about it?”

 

We’re creating something for them to actually concretely believe in and to support.

 

But anyway, we’ll keep playing this clip.

 

Blair Cottrell: Before you do, before you click play, we’ve got well over one and a half thousand live viewers, almost approaching 2,000 actually on X, which is awesome for our first ever X stream!

 

Joel Davis: Not sure if that’s live viewers. I think the way that Twitter counts views is just anyone who views it just becomes a view. I don’t think they’re all necessarily viewing it all at the same time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, well, it’s still a great amount of viewership and probably more than we get on Rumble. So just wanted to throw out some appreciation to everybody who is tuning in active in the live chat. That’s awesome! Thanks, guys.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s good. I think it will expand the audience. I mean, there’s still a lot of people watching a Rumble and Odysee, as usual. So, yeah, why not add the extra platform?

 

But, yeah, we’ll keep playing this clip.

 

[32:37]

 

Nick Fuentes: I don’t know what the model is there. I don’t know what the strategy is there. But he went from kind of like, where we were, which is be presentable, be nationalistic, et cetera, to like, now he’s dressing in all black with a bunch of thugs, throwing up Hitler salutes, screaming the n-word, and not in like a fun, … You know, sometimes I do that in, like a half joking way. It’s edgy! It’s like edge lord humour. We wouldn’t do that at a rally. We wouldn’t do that at a thing. And screaming about the “in-word this” and “get the fuck out!” Like, I’m sorry, I don’t know who that’s supposed to convince. Who is that supposed to win over other than other extreme young men?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we’re trying to win over other extreme young men! We’re trying to recruit them. [chuckling] That’s kind of the idea.

 

We present ourselves in a militant way because we want to recruit young White men with a militant attitude. We want to recruit tough young men that are willing to make sacrifices, that are willing to take risks, because we’re trying to build a core of revolutionaries. Those are the kinds of people that are revolutionaries.

 

And a lot of people in the public do like us and sympathize with us, but we know that they’re not going to come and join us because joining us is kind of intimidating. It’s scary, it’s commitment.

 

So we have a lot of passive supporters in the community that I think are glad to see militant young White men standing up for them. And they’ll be much happier to see us when there’s a thousand, and they’ll be much, way more happy to see us when there’s 10,000. The bigger we get, the more they’ll love us.

 

But we are trying to appeal to the men that are going to come and be part of that first thousand and then be part of that first 10,000. And those people, yeah, they’re going to have, like, they’re not going to be your average normie. They’re going to be people that are, have a so-called “extreme personality”, I guess, in some way, shape or form. We need people that are willing to become revolutionaries, that’s the only way we’re going to get there.

 

So, yes, the way we dress in black and we look kind of staunch and intimidating and give off a militant aura, because we’re trying to attract those people.

 

And also we’re trying to show that we’re serious, that we mean business. We don’t want fat nerds! We don’t want losers! We don’t want people that are soft. We don’t want people that are compromising. We want people that want to come and embrace an uncompromising, revolutionary message.

 

So that’s the logic. I don’t know if Tom wants to comment on that or if we should just keep watching.

 

Thomas Sewell: What he’s most upset about, in my opinion, in this segment, which I think a lot of people in our wider movement, I mean, this kind of rhetoric reminds me of Thuletide, for example. There’s a lot of people in the wider movement that are really upset with how we’re going about our activism and how we’re going about our optics.

 

And the main complaint I’ve heard, which he hasn’t said the words exactly, but they say it like this usually:

 

“You’re dressing up like you’re the enemy!”

 

That’s usually how they say it:

 

“You’re dressing up like you’re the enemy!”

 

I’ve heard this from all sorts of Liberal Party circles, you know, people that are quite sympathetic to us, you know, conservatives, conservative boomers.

 

And then:

 

“They don’t understand. They just don’t get it. You’re dressing up like the enemy. Why are you dressing up like the enemy? Why are you making yourself out to be like the enemy? !”

 

Just can’t conceive it.

 

And the reason why they can’t conceive it is because they’re collaborating with the enemy. They don’t participate strictly in the distinction. Nick Fuentes and his strategy and all the other Entriest type strategies, they want to be part of the system. They’ll wear a suit and a tie. They’ll pretend to be a lawyer, or they’ll pretend to be part of the political class, the Liberal political class. They’re larping as the people in power to try to fool the public into thinking that:

 

“We’re the same as the people in power, just with a little bit more common sense. And that’s how we’re going to get legitimacy.”

 

And it’s foolish! Because they’re never going to get legitimacy because they’re not puppets! The only people that have legitimacy within the Liberal order are put there by the men behind the curtain. And they’re never going to put someone like Nick Fuentes there.

 

So the Entriest policy, although it can make some initial progress and it can certainly create some compromised halfway positions towards where we want to go, it can never go all the way that we need to go! And he exposes himself as not even believing in wanting to go all the way. And he’s compromising himself because of this. He says something like:

 

“Oh, I don’t know much about Australia, but good luck to them! They’re never going to make Australia White!”

 

It’s like, we are going to make Australia White. That’s a fact. We are. It’s an absolute, undeniable, 100% fact! We have the numbers, we have the people. We’re not going to be swamped by billions of nons. That’s just not going to happen, because it’s one or the other. And we’re the last stand of the antipodean in the south. We’re going to make that stand and we’re going to be successful in that stand. And we have the faith. We have the belief in that.

 

So, yeah, we are dressing up as the enemy. We are. And that’s on purpose. It’s to create contrast, it’s to create distinction. And in time, right now, people aren’t angry enough. They should be much more angry than they are, especially with what’s going on in Germany and what’s going on in England. But even in America and Australia, it’s the same nonsense! It’s the same crap going on. You know, it’s police knocking on people’s doors for having the wrong political opinions.

 

And what’s going to happen over time is, and it’s already happening in real time, is people are losing faith in the establishment! They’re losing faith in the system and its institutions. And they’re going from losing faith in this system and its institutions into feeling like the system and its institutions are the enemy!

 

And then the enemy, or the system, is stupid enough to point out at 20 dudes in black block and say:

 

“That’s the enemy. That’s the enemy. These people are the enemy. They’re the enemy within. They’re the problem. Look at these evil Nazis! They’re the number one enemy. They’re the most toxic form of politics. They’re the most horrible, evil enemy to ever exist! These 20 men, or these 30 men, or these 50, or these 70!”

 

Or wherever it goes from there, and they’re stupid enough to do that. And what they fail to realise is that the average Australian is starting to hate the government! The average Australian is really starting to feel like the government is their enemy.

 

And when the government points out that we are the legitimate, full, 100% enemy of the system, well, now the people know where to look for:

 

“So, wait, if the government is my enemy, and the government is saying these people are the enemy? Well, maybe I identify with these people!”

 

And that is why we’re dressing up as the enemy, because we are the enemy of the people that want to destroy the White race. That’s our enemy and we’re their enemy. It’s that clear!

 

[40:10]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s well said.

 

And you mentioned there, Australia. And Nick is giving a perspective as an outsider from America. He’s not really savvy with what’s happening in Australian social, political life. Right. What he probably doesn’t understand is Australians have a certain disdain for careerist commentary. Like, they want to see action. They want to see someone ruffling the feathers, someone sort of pushing boundaries. And Australians really value an underdog as well. You know, we have that kind of culture down here. And are you saying, Tom, that maybe Fuentes is only really interested in remaining a careerist political commentator who wants to remain within the boundaries of the existing system, that maybe he’s trying to avoid that kind of more revolutionary, radical perspective and that’s why he’s kind of not really into the activism? Is that what you’re saying?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, absolutely! I think that there’s two main types of far-Right people, if you want to describe them as that there are revolutionaries and there are reformers.

 

And I think he’s made it very clear that he’s a reformer. He wants reform. He wants Trump to take off the tie and crack the whip. He wants Trump to get the job done, build the wall, deport some of the Mexicans, or a couple million of them. But he doesn’t want a complete revolution. He doesn’t want a complete change in the entire system:

 

“The system is relatively good. There’s just a bit too many jews in power, and we can just make these kind of meantime reforms and go back to 1990.”

 

Joel Davis: That’s the thing, he says that he does want a revolution. Like when he talked, like, on this same stream, I watched a little bit of it, and he said some really good things earlier in the stream about how he called himself a White supremacist. He said:

 

“He doesn’t care what brown people have to say about White genocide, that our race is being genocided and we’re going to be angry about it and we’re going to do something about it and we’ll let when we’ve gone too far. But we’re nowhere near going too far at this point.”

 

And a lot of good rhetoric.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, that’s interesting because according to him we’re going too far. So he’s gonna let us, …

 

Joel Davis: What he’s having an issue with is the street activism.

 

But it’s like, that’s the thing. It’s like you want to have a politics with revolutionary outcomes, but then you want to go about it like a conservative, like you want to go about it where you wear the suit and the tie and let’s infiltrate the system and let’s change hearts and minds and like you’re not going to get revolutionary outcomes from conservative strategies.

 

Now when we look at, when we take a survey of the land and we look at the university educated, you know, upper middle class types, people who get law degrees, people who work in law enforcement, people who work in politics, these are the hardest people to get to take on a revolutionary agenda because they have the most to lose from throwing their lot in with any kind of radical movement. Because their entire livelihood, their entire career could be crumbled in one instant through association to anyone who is too radical being made public.

 

So we looked at that and we said:

 

“Okay, trying to build on that foundation is going to be a house built on sand.”

 

Because all of these people are basically being selected into all of these positions through their capacity for risk avoidance. And their entire livelihoods are going to be built around that foundation.

 

[44:01]

 

So then we go and look at, okay, well then we’ve got this demographic of White working class tradesmen, skilled labourers and so on. Guys who own their own businesses, guys who work in small businesses, guys that are masculine, guys that are into fitness, guys that have a militant attitude, they have an aggression that are generally the most racist demographic in Australian society, and the most free! Because they don’t work in industries where their livelihoods could necessarily be destroyed by association to a radical political movement. And we go:

 

“Well, we could recruit from that demographic of disaffected young men who are looking at society and saying, ‘It’s going to cost me a million dollars to buy a house in an average suburb. I want to get married, I want to have kids, I want my kids to go to good schools, I want to be able to live in a decent home. And now I’m basically going to be mortgaged up to the shithouse for the rest of my life, enslaved to jews to live in a shitty suburb surrounded by Indians, send my kids to a school where the jews are going to teach them to become trannies. This is fucking unacceptable! This is fucking unacceptable! I’m going to do something about it. I’m going to go and join these boys’!”

 

There are hundreds of thousands if not millions of young White men in that demographic who are going to love our message and who already do love our message! We could build a massive, massive movement of young men that will have money, that will be able to put their bodies in the street and extract a lot of strength from the people. And this is similar to if you read Mein Kampf. When Hitler kind of looked at the conservative movement of his day and the middle class and the petty bourgeois class of his day, he analyzed them and said:

 

“You know what? It’s going to be difficult for us to draw much strength from these people because they’re not doing so bad within the system. The system is offering them kind of positions but at the same time their mentality is fundamentally reformist. Their mentality is fundamentally servile to the establishment. We’re going to have to go and draw our strength from the class below them, and we’re going to have to appeal to them and build them into a large movement and then through strength in numbers then impose ourselves upon the political system with a more revolutionary kind of politics than what the conservacucks are going to be offering.”

 

Which is all conservatism is a compromise with the enemy. So we are trying to reach into the revolutionary demographic in Australian society and build upon that foundation. And yeah, they might be a little bit more rough around the edges. Yeah they might not have as refined sensibilities and so on, but they are ultimately going to be providing the raw manpower and the raw resources to actually put together a proper White nationalist political movement.

 

And then once we have a White nationalist political movement of a sufficient size, then we will have the ability to go and get those higher quality types, the people with the law degrees, the guys that are working in politics, the guys that are of that higher echelon of society and say:

 

“Hey, we’ve already got an established party here, we’ve got an established organisation, we’ve got money, we’ve got chapters in every single town in every major city. We’ve got guys everywhere. We’ve got resources. We can fund you, we can support you. Come and join us. It doesn’t matter if they know that you’re a Nazi because we can fucking support you! The movement can support you don’t need the system anymore to operate.”

 

And then we have a chance at actually winning. Because right now our enemies control the money. Our enemies control all the positions of influence. And everyone that’s going in there trying to infiltrate the system has to play by the rules of the enemy. And so they’re all totally ineffective!

 

I know plenty of guys that have infiltrated that are staffers in all of these political parties across the Australian Right. Guys that have branch stacked and become branch presidents within the Liberal Party, which is our biggest conservative Party, guys that have been staffers for major Right-wing politicians and so on. Whenever I talk to them about what’s going on inside the party and they give me the inside baseball, they tell me about what’s happening. And their role in what’s happening is zero! They just have to kind of go with the flow. They don’t actually have any agency. They’re in there. They’re talking to the movers and shakers. They’re talking to the leaders of the Australian conservative movement.

 

But ultimately they’re having basically zero effect in there! And they’ve been in there the whole time. White nationalists have been infiltrating the Australian conservative movement for decades and getting themselves in there.

 

And ultimately they have been able to do nothing to affect the kind of winds of change. And that’s because the jews and the property developers and the business lobby and all of these powerful interests that control the conservative movement are the ones that have the money! They’re the ones that are ultimately calling the shots.

 

So until we are able to raise our own resources from an alternative base, from a base that comes from the people, from the White Australian people, rather than coming top down from these bourgeois elites that don’t give a fuck about their country or that only care about their economic interests or these jews that have their own agenda or whatever, we’re not going to get anywhere. We’re not going to fucking get anywhere because they’re our fucking enemies! They’re our political enemies. They have no interest in struggling or supporting anyone who wants to struggle on behalf of securing a future for White Australian people. White Australian families, White Australian children. And that’s all we care about! That’s the only reason we are involved in this shit!

 

[49:28]

 

So we have no choice but to go and build from basically square one. I’ve surveyed the whole Australian political system. There’s no fucking entry points! We have to go basically from scratch. And it’s kind of crude. We have to basically dress in black and walk in the streets. All the guys are in balaclavas because only like 15 of us are even willing to show our face. We’re trying to conceal them from getting doxxed, which we have done relatively successfully. But we’re still putting ourselves out there in the street to say:

 

“Hey, there’s someone that’s fucking fighting! There’s someone that’s willing to put boys together, join us!”

 

And boys are joining us. Every week we get more and more recruits. The speed of recruitment has only been increasing all year. Every time we do one of these street actions, we get recruits.

 

Thomas Sewell: We had three more recruits in Melbourne just tonight.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. We are accumulating manpower faster and faster and faster, week on week. We’re putting the message out. We’re putting ourselves out there.

 

A lot of people in Australia know who we are, and a lot of people are very supportive. We’ve done street marches down the street and all over the country now, and lots of positive responses from the public. People tooting the horns, throwing romans out the window, grandmas coming over and saying words of encouragement. We get just as much positive reinforcement from the public as negative, if not more positive reinforcement in our recent activism.

 

So there’s a lot of sympathy in the community. People see us on the news all the time. They know who we are and they like us. And maybe there’s a distinction between the American mentality and the Australian mentality. The Americans, they’ve got their own kind of White nationalist street movement scene. This isn’t me throwing shade at them, but probably because of how big America is and how complex American politics are, they aren’t as able as we are to present themselves to the public in a strong way and get the whole political system to kind of react to them like we can. Because Australia’s got nothing going on. It’s a dead political scene. Politics is fucking boring! There’s barely anything happening on the news.

 

So when we do something, it’s a big deal. You know, we’re an established brand here, unlike these American groups. And so we’re able to get a certain kind of response from the public that I think is different than the American groups can.

 

And the thing is, as well, in America, people have a lot of hope in Trump. And in America, people are very concerned with the conservative movement and the Republican Party. And America is a very politicised country. People are very concerned about conservative versus liberal and all this shit in America. In Australia, we live in a very de-politicised society. The average person doesn’t really give a fuck about politics, doesn’t have very strong opinions either way. They have social opinions. They have opinions on race, but they don’t have opinions that are very political, if that makes sense. People are very casually racist. They’ve got casual social opinions about feminism or gays or whatever. It isn’t really kind of contextualised through which party you support and which political leaders you like. Pretty much all the major politicians are just hated by everyone. No one is particularly passionate in support of any of them. No one particularly cares about politics in Australia, quite frankly. It’s a much more minor aspect of our society than in the United States.

 

So part of our job as well, is to do something fucking interesting that someone will care about. In America, you’ve got a pre-existing political system to kind of interface with. The Groypers can sit on the edge of the Trump movement and be relevant. If we tried to sit on the edge of the Australian Right-wing, well, no one’s fucking paying attention to the Right-wing politics anyway. It’s a bunch of boomers that watch cable news. But no one under the age of 50 is even really fucking paying attention. So no one would care. There’s no market there. We have to basically be provocative in order to even get anyone to look at us in the first place.

 

That’s another thing to take into consideration. Why in Australia, it’s like, you’ve got this lame conservative movement and then nothing, and then a bunch of Nazis. In America, you’ve got all these different positions on the Right-wing political spectrum that are being occupied by different actors. We just don’t really have that.

 

So, yeah, like Australia, more one dimensional than American politics, frankly.

 

Blair Cottrell: Good spiel. Are we ever going to get through this video? [chuckling]

 

Nick Fuentes: You know, who is that supposed to win over? Is that going to win over elite people? Is that going to win over high IQ people? Is that going to earn the support of any large number of people? Who is that actually attractive to? Who sees an expression like that, which is very negative and very vulgar and very angry and foreign, and say:

“I want to be a part of that! I want to go stand outside in the street in a costume, yelling racial hatred and abuse because of immigration or something.”

So I think it’s just stupid! I’ve said that for years. It’s stupid when Patriot Front does it’s stupid. When Blood Tribe does it’s stupid. When the Alt-Right did it. You know, NSM. And all those TRS, all those guys. It’s just dumb. Like, I don’t believe in larping. I’m American, and I don’t hate anybody. You know, I’m a normal White American. I want this to be a majority White country.

And I’m also intelligent. Like, I’m not an unpleasant coarse person! And these guys, they’ll act like they’re soldiers. I don’t know. Has Joel Davis ever been in a war? You know, you think because you train combat sports that now you’re gonna be like a soldier. They act like they’re veterans. They go march around, yell slurs at people, and then they go in a bar and they act like they just fought a battle.

 

[55:40]

 

Blair Cottrell: I used to agree with this kind of take. This is surreal to me because a few years ago, I was saying similar stuff to this. I was against larping, and I thought that:

 

“What are they doing, these activists the boys, NSN, no one’s ever going to agree with that this is not going to work. Aahh!”

 

I was doing that as well. But I remembered something. I remembered something that Tom told me. Tom told me:

 

“You’ve got to let a thousand flowers blossom.”

 

Right? And I can’t remember where he got that from or whether he. It came to him as a result of his own thinking. Mao?

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s an ancient quote. I think Mao copied it from a Greek philosopher.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And I realised that you also need a gang. You need a gang that’s going to back you up, someone that you can put faith in. You need a community.

 

And that’s the thing about us as boys down here in Australia, whether we’re involved in activism or not, we’re all part of that gang, because there’s not many of us down here, and we’re all mates. We know each other, we eat together, we train together, and we back each other up regardless of what it is we’re doing. And we’re all contributing to forging a popular counterculture. I think:

 

“All great movements must be popular movements.”

 

Hitler said. And I can feel that the popularity of nationalism, or even National Socialism is growing, not just in Australia, but around the world. And it’s growing partly as a result of the activism the guys have been doing down here. It’s been making the regular Australian person think that:

 

“Oh, maybe these slogans and catchphrases aren’t that bad.”

 

They smile about it, they laugh about it, they talk about it on job sites. And they are being primed to support the counterculture that is forging, is coming together before our eyes. Right?

 

So I used to believe what Nick believed. I used to say the same stuff he was saying, but I was just getting the same nonsense from the same bullshit, established political forces. And I realised that, as you guys have probably articulated already, you can’t always play by the rules of the establishment or be interested in some sort of careerist position within the parameters and boundaries where the establishment will allow you to operate. That’s too frustrating for me, especially down here in Australia.

 

And I like Nick. I think Nicks, all right. And I like the fact that he has a big viewership. I like anyone who makes our politics more popular because it contributes to the growth of the counterculture throughout majority White nations, extension colonies of Europe and so forth. Right?

 

So that’s my primary concern. I think becoming more popular is at the heart of what we’re doing. And every bit of political activism, stream, commentary, organisation, whatever we’re doing, it’s all contributing in some small way to growing our counterculture, growing the popularity of our counterculture. And look, the recruitment drive has been great. Like, the results will speak for themselves. This is the thing. Even if you want to stay on the side of Fuentes and say:

 

“Yeah, the activism is bullshit! These guys are larpers! We don’t need that. Whatever. What we need to do is just keep streaming and working within the parameters of the current political establishment, and eventually we’ll get somewhere!”

 

Whatever. In a few years time, you’re going to see which one of those approaches is producing the right kind of result. Right? And I don’t think you’re going to see much change, …

 

Joel Davis: Every revolutionary movement starts as larping. You know, there was a time at which Vladimir Lenin was standing in a room with a bunch of like 50 communists or 50 Bolsheviks or whatever, taking themselves really seriously.

 

And I think there was actually a quote once where someone met Vladimir Lenin at a party in Germany somewhere when he was exiled from Russia. And it was like some little Communist Party. That’s kind of funny saying communist. It was like a party, like an actual party, not a political party full of communists. And someone went up and said:

 

“Oh, hello, Vladimir.”

 

And he’s:

 

“Hi, I’m Vladimir Lenin, the future leader of the Russian Revolution.”

 

And he’s kind of laughed, but it was true! But at that time, he just had like this little journal about communist theory that, like, 45 guys were reading and a group of larpers, and they were not even in their actual country. They were exiled to Germany. Ten years later, he leads the Russian Revolution, and now he’s like the dictator of the Soviet Union, and he’s got a Red Army with millions of men, and now he’s done it! You’re larping until you’re not.

 

You know, at one point, when Adolf Hitler joined up with the NSDAP and they had their first meeting, they’re in the beer hall, there’s, like 90 of them. And there’s some guy taking minutes and they’re taking themselves very seriously:

 

“And this is how we’re going to save Germany!”

 

And there’s 90 guys at the pub. Fast forward yourself, you know, 15 years or less. Less like twelve years, ten years. There’s a Nuremberg rally with millions of guys! So everything’s larping until it isn’t!

 

So this idea, …

 

[1:01:01]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: So what creates that, though? What makes the larp real?

 

Joel Davis: To become worthy of being taken seriously by anyone.

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s the force, Joel? What’s the force? And, Tom, you can answer this, too. What is the force that starts making the larp real, that starts giving the larp real power? What is it?

 

Thomas Sewell: Inspiration. It’s spirit. It’s spiritual inspiration. Yeah. And that’s what you can’t measure. So Nick can complain about our strategy, and he can’t conceive what we’re doing, and why are we doing it. Because he’s not really inspiring anyone. He’s just got a team of consumers. His audience just simply consume, whereas our audience, we don’t really want them to just consume. We’re trying to get them to be politically mobile. We want them to be activists like us. And Hitler’s success, and even the American Revolutionary success came from inspiration. And Nick wants to say that he’s an American. He says:

 

“I’m an American, so this Australian stuff isn’t really relevant to me.”

 

Well, what about the American Revolution? Is that relevant to Nick Fuentes? Because the American Revolutionaries had uniforms. The American Revolutionaries larped. The American Revolutionaries weren’t attracting the majority of the society at the beginning. There was only a very small percentage of the American colonies of the population that actually supported the American Revolutionaries. But they didn’t need 51%. They just needed the men that had the strength and the courage. And that’s the most important people that you need to recruit and attract and have sympathize with your message. The politically mobile people, the people that will take politics to its nth degree.

 

So we’re inspiring people. And that’s not even really measurable right now in the boots we have on the ground, because what we’ve done is we’re setting ourselves up as a brand. We’re setting, you know, Joel called it earlier in the stream, he called it. What was it like? Not Right-wing drama. But you said it was, not theatre, but, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Performance art.

 

Thomas Sewell: Performance art! Yes. So if we’re going to describe it as that, it allows people to see the distinction. It allows the average person on the street, like, we don’t even need the banner anymore. We don’t even need a banner. We don’t even need to bring a flag. When people see us now, when they see us in formation, they immediately know what side they’re on. Does that make sense? They immediately, …

 

Joel Davis: We bring the banner to make a statement. We don’t have to bring the banner to identify who we are the banner is why we are there.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. When people see us now, they either smile or they’re afraid or they are a communist or something.

 

But that’s really it. There’s like, the traitors, the lukewarm and the fighters. And when the fighters, when the people that care about Australia, when they see us, even if they’re not physical fighters, they’re just moral fighters. When the moral fighters, when they see us, they smile. They say:

 

“Good on your boys!”

 

They wave at us. Sometimes they even throw Roman salutes at us. And they’re not necessarily Nazis. They don’t necessarily even know anything about Hitler, anything about World War Two. They just know how fucked up society is! And they know that we’re the only ones in the country actually standing up to it! Really properly, just being like, fuck this! [chuckling] We’re 100% against all this. We’re standing up for it.

 

And that’s why people are putting their trust in us that’s beyond the metrics of the normal political system. That’s beyond the Liberal political system. The trust they have in us is on a different level.

 

Blair Cottrell: Just to play contrarian, because some people might be thinking this, I think. Do you think you run the risk of just becoming a spectacle or object of amusement for these people who are smiling at you but who never intend to join? Do you think there’s the risk of that?

 

Joel Davis: A lot of people don’t intend to join. Because that’s the thing. Like, we don’t need everyone. Like, we want to have lots of supporters. Like, it’s not just about whether you join or don’t join. There’s kind of two tiers. There’s, like, building the radical group of people that actually join, obviously. But then there’s the effect on the wider community. And that was what I thought was so good about the Fuck Off, We’re Full rally that we did. I read through the comments. There was one upload of it on TikTok that got, like, nearly a million views just on that one upload until it was taken down of that rally. And the comments were pretty much all positive.

 

And there was a lot of people commenting in there that were quite clearly just normal conservative types. Like, they weren’t, like, full on “the Holocaust was fake! Hitler’s awesome!” type people. There were just a normal Right-wing people that just don’t like immigration. And they were like:

 

“This is awesome! How good is someone standing up against it?”

 

And then people were like:

 

“Oh, but they’re Nazis!”

 

And they’re like:

 

“No, they’re not Nazis! You know, they’re just good, like, patriots or whatever!”

 

This kind of thing. [chuckling] And it was quite interesting because we are Nazis. And we put ourselves forward in balaclavas and black, and we’re all intimidating, yet still we’re able to solicit the sympathy of normal Right-wing White people, which is perfect when you can marry those two things together. And that’s kind of our objective. Our objective is to try and get normal Right-wing White people or Right leaning White people, patriotic leaning White people, to start looking at us and sympathizing with us. Because convincing 50% of Australians that National Socialism is good, theoretically, that’s never going to happen.

 

But if we can show them National Socialism in practice by actually putting bodies in the street, in a way that’s we’re standing up for them against the people that they know they don’t like, against things they don’t like the trans people, grooming of children and these immigrants pouring into the country and so on. And they go:

 

“Wait a second. Like, these guys are obviously the good guys in this arrangement!”

 

[1:07:23]

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you say, Tom, that’s what you hear most from the women Tom? Is that what you said?

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ve heard that thousands of times over the past two or three years. From women, specifically women. I don’t really hear it ever from men, but from women. That is what they keep saying in person and online. That is what they keep saying. That is something that is echoing, constantly echoing! Every time we do a rally, every time we do a demonstration, every time we cross paths with a woman that’s sympathetic to us. They say these words:

 

“Thank you for standing up for us!”

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s curious, because in our Mein Kampf, Hitler writes that the quality of a movement, that is to say, whether or not it’s effective, can be measured by how many women are supportive of it. That if the women don’t like it’s never going to be popular, it’s never going to be good, it’s never going to be effective.

 

So, yeah, it’s curious. And I think what he meant by that is, obviously that the regular people are of a feminine predisposition. So if you want to appeal to regular people, then you have to appeal to the feminine element within people. I think that’s what he was getting at.

 

But what he’s basically written down there is, if only men are interested in your politics, you need to rework it, you need to simplify it. You need to make it palpable to the feminine instinct. Then you’ll become popular, because then you’ll appeal to the masses. Right?

 

Joel Davis: That’s the thing about when the kind of militant presentation and the show of strength, that’s kind of what part of that is about. It’s kind of like sexy. It’s, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It must be refined. It can’t be vulgar. It must be refined strength. And that’s, like, something that I think in recent years, you guys have really gotten down pat.

 

 

Joel Davis: Well, it’s something that we definitely want to improve. I mean, we’re just starting out.

 

I mean, look at the SS uniformity now. That’s sexy! When a man walked into the bar in 1932, Munich, wearing his SS uniform, the girls are like, “hmmm!” when he walks in because that’s a man. That’s a sexy man in uniform right there. And that’s probably part of the reason why the women were going crazy for the Nazis and why they’re off the front row throwing Romans and clapping for Hitler and why women voted. I think women actually outvoted men for the Nazis in the election. Because they were like:

 

“Yeah, these are some men! These are some proper sexy men coming bringing change to Germany!”

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s the second most common thing that I hear from the women. They don’t necessarily say “sexy”, although there is a few women that are in a different age bracket that probably shouldn’t be saying that to us that do. But and they know who they are. That’s slightly problematic, but anyway.

 

The second most common thing that I hear, is they say:

 

“Here are some men!”

 

They just simply say that:

 

“Here are some men!”

 

That’s what they say.

 

So the first most common thing that I hear is:

 

“Thank you for standing up for us!”

 

And the second most common thing that they say is:

 

“Here are some men. Finally, some men!”

 

Blair Cottrell: It must be a sad reality.

 

Thomas Sewell: Nick would never understand that. Nick would never understand that.

 

Blair Cottrell: But it must be a pretty, … Imagine being a woman in this world. And you once knew what men were. I mean, I suppose this is women like of the older generations. They once were surrounded by men, and now it’s like they’re all gone!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: And in their place, there’s this hollowed out shell of men that doesn’t really feel masculine, and so they feel, … It must be a scary reality for women to feel like within their own nation, they don’t have men looking after them.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, it’s the Albaneses, the Kevin Rudds the Scomos. These are all husbands. They’re all husbands. They would be too afraid to upset a mouse. Yeah, they’re just husbands. They’re housebound. They do as they’re told. They pee sitting down. They pee sitting down!

 

Blair Cottrell: House negroes! Not like us field negroes! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, well, we’re wignats. You know? We’re wignats, as Nick puts it. You know, it’s like we don’t care about the establishment. We don’t care what it thinks. The establishment has lost, has broke the social contract. They have broken the social contract! They don’t deserve respect. They don’t deserve us larping as them.

 

Blair Cottrell: Can someone clarify for me? Can someone clarify what, … I think I know, but probably an embarrassing question. What is a “wignat”? What is that? Because Nick called me a wignat.

 

Joel Davis: Wigger Nationalists. So a wigger is a White nigger.

 

And so it was a term that was basically created to attack, quote, unquote, “trailer trash nationalism” in America, where guys are showing up fat, covered in tattoos, waving swastika flags, like:

 

“Yeah, fuck niggers!”

 

And people would say:

 

“Oh, like, wigger nationalism!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh no!

 

Joel Davis: But it’s, like, really inaccurate because, I mean, Blair isn’t really a wigger, is he? , …

 

Blair Cottrell: I would like to think that I’m not. But I find that curious because, …

 

Joel Davis: Define basically anyone who is, too, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, I’m the personification of the racist Australian! And I didn’t even know what “wignat” was. So that might be some perspective for Nick to take on board. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

[1:12:43]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. I don’t know. It’s just, again, it’s applying Americanisms to Australia. But also, I would say us showing up in black, I think we look cool! I think looking cool, … Blair talks about this. That looking cool is actually really more important than almost anything else that you do in politics. Because it’s about aesthetics. It’s about, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Unfortunately, it’s true.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

And I remember when the boys did, because I was in Melbourne at the time, when the boys did the Destroy Pedos rally, and they were they showed up, they gate crashed the feminist versus tranny protest kind of clash last year. I remember you saying:

 

“I wasn’t so sure about this whole project that you guys have started, but this sold me because you guys look cool.”

 

And they’re showing them on the news, walking around, you know, muscly, in the black, throwing the Roman back when we could still throw Romans and it was still legal. And they did. They looked objectively cool. Like, the news started, like, blurring out their arms, because those muscly Roman arms were just too good aesthetics, the jews were getting too offended. [chuckling] But it looked fucking cool!

 

And that’s the thing you could say:

 

“Oh, does that appeal to everyone?”

 

Yeah, but, like, everything, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It almost does. One. One of the core components of looking cool is just being fit. You know, just being fit makes you look cool. It makes you look good in anything you wear. So that in itself, … If you’re in a individual sense or on a private basis, if you’re dedicating, you know, an hour or two a day to bodybuilding, fight training, cardiovascular activity, and you’re actually getting fit. What you’re doing there is almost using your time in such a way where you’re on an individual basis contributing to the broader collective, because when you do show up to events, you’re going to look good, and as a result, you’re going to make the collective look better, and then more people are going to want to join it. That’s pretty simple stuff.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I mean, it’s important to look cool. I think we pull off looking cool.

 

I mean, I’ve seen our clips and pictures of us getting used by nationalists all over the world. People seem to really, really like us all over the global scene, including a lot of Americans. We seem to appeal to a lot of Americans. Our largest audience for this show is American. We got more Americans than Australians watching, by my metric, by my counting.

 

Blair Cottrell: Which demonstrates that there’s obviously an appeal. This show has some sort of appeal to an American audience. So maybe there’s something to learn from us?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, exactly. And I agree. Sometimes a little bit more discipline would be good. Like, as we get bigger, we will probably want to refine it and make it a little bit more disciplined, a little bit more formal as it matures and we have more manpower and so on to convey, like, a deeper seriousness.

 

But in a lot of respects, what will create the seriousness of the movement is just the sheer quantity. Like, if we’re doing the same thing we’re doing now, but with way larger numbers, then Australia will have to take notice. Like, there’s a certain scale of people where if it’s 10,000 of us in the street doing what we do, that can’t be ignored! Like, it just simply can’t be ignored. People are going to have to take us seriously and what we represent seriously.

 

And so I said this on Twitter today, that I think the difficulty White nationalism has in appealing to the White masses isn’t necessarily anything inherent to the ideology. Like, White nationalism, I think, is inherently appealing. There’s a reason why White people used to all be White nationalists, because it’s obviously inherently appealing, because it’s an ideology built around what’s good for White people.

 

So if you’re a White person, why wouldn’t that appeal to you?

 

So there’s a lot of inherent appeal in the idea. The problem is that people have become so demoralised, and the idea has become so attacked and kind of sidelined that people don’t really believe in it as something viable.

 

Like, the common refrain that I get from so many people is not necessarily that it wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing if we had a White country or if we could send the brown people back, or if we could close the borders and so on. Most people, right of centre and even in the centre, you know, that ideal isn’t necessarily the worst idea to them, but what is:

 

“It’s so unrealistic. How are you going to go about doing that? I mean, let’s get real here!”

 

And so on. They don’t believe that it’s possible. They don’t believe that you could ever mobilise enough support, enough political will to actually pull it off. That’s the thing, holding people back, not the inherent notion of the idea. And people don’t want to throw their chips on the most controversial idea in society with, 20 other guys, with a dream.

 

But eventually, if we can grow to enough strength where we actually look serious, where we can be taken seriously due to our size, then all of a sudden, people have something to believe in:

 

“Wow, these guys are really growing. This is actually a movement!”

 

Now. All of a sudden, the idea of White nationalism isn’t just an abstract idea. Now it’s actually a real movement that is growing in your country of guys that look like you, that look like your brother, that look like your cousin, that look like you’re mate at work or look like your best friend, and they’re all in the street together, shoulder to shoulder.

 

And it’s like, what does that mean? Then all of a sudden, the people are going to be inspired.

 

Then all of a sudden, the discourse is going to change. And that can’t really be quantified. That’s, that comes down to the will, and it comes down to, its a spiritual thing, really. It’s not something that can be quantified in a series of rational arguments. But the monkey brain of:

 

“I have to conform with society because I don’t want to become some outcast of society and embrace this radically marginalised idea!”

 

All of a sudden, when it’s 10,000 men walking down the street, the monkey brain is going to shift and say:

 

“Well, this is actually something I can consider now!”

 

[1:18:53]

 

 

Like, they did this one study where they got a control group and then another group, and they would show images on the screen, and there’d be, like, a shape. It was a blue shape. And they got everyone in the room other than the individual they were testing to all say it was green, and the individual, and it was blue, though. But they got everyone else to say it’s green.

 

And then they go to the guy who’s, like, not in on it and say:

 

“What colour is that shape?”

 

And a lot of the time they conformed, even though they can see that it’s blue. They say:

 

“It’s green.”

 

Because everyone else is saying it’s green:

 

“I guess it must be green, and I’m crazy! I don’t want to be the weirdo that says it’s blue!”

 

And then they have another group under different conditions. And what they found is that, like people are highly conformist, basically. People will literally call something green blue or blue green or whatever just to conform over something, something as goofy as that.

 

And that is happening on a mass scale on the issue of race. Like, everyone can see that there’s a racial problem. The average White person can feel it deep down inside, but they repress it. There has to be some kind of spiritual force that like, brings that racial feeling back up to the surface and tells them:

 

“Actually those feelings that you have deep down inside those are valid. There’s hundreds of thousands of other people, millions of other White people that feel exactly the same!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you think that’s why people smile? Do you think that’s why people are amused when they see someone who’s pointing out that the races aren’t equal or who’s representing some form of racial nationalism? People almost smile because there is some element to comedy that I don’t fully understand where the truth is actually funny, if you point out a truth that you’re not supposed to point out or notice because it might make people a little bit uncomfortable. What do you think, Tom?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I mean, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s got to be. It’s got to be like:

 

“Oh, wow!”

 

Yeah. It’s like:

 

“Oh, wow, the truth that we’re not supposed to see. He’s saying it. Oh, my God!”

 

It’s, like, really shocking! Maybe why people smile. Comedians understand this principle better than I do, but I know there’s a correlation between comedy and truth, and probably that’s why people are so amused by racism. Like, the younger generation, Zoomers*, they love racism! I’ve never met a generation that uses, like, derogatory slurs for certain races more than the Zoomers do, and they think it’s hilarious! Probably it’s hilarious to them, because these slurs usually based on some observable reality within certain races. And so they’re not entirely devoid of truth. Actually, they’re quite accurate in a lot of cases. [chuckling] And so the Zoomers find them genuinely amusing.

 

[* Generation Z (often shortened to Gen Z), also known as Zoomers, is the demographic cohort succeeding Millennials and preceding Generation Alpha. Researchers and popular media use the mid-to-late 1990s as starting birth years and the early 2010s as ending birth years, with the generation most frequently being defined as people born from 1997 to 2012. Most members of Generation Z are the children of younger Baby Boomers or Generation X. Wikipedia]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. I think people also smile at the shock factor. There’s a shock factor to go from living your daily life, contending with pajeets and everything else that’s going on and getting fatigue from the society that you’re living in, and then just randomly out of the blue for seemingly no reason at all, there’s just 50 Nazis marching down the street chanting “blood and honour!” And that just seems crazy on the surface level. But there’s value in the shock of that because it’s like a big wake up! It’s like a big shake up of the psyche.

 

And if someone just went into the letterbox, for example, and it was just this very, very common sense and reasonable diatribe about the nature of the economy and how it’s not doing too well, and the schools are getting a bit overcrowded and maybe we should look at reducing immigration to a more sustainable level. It’s not going to shock the psyche. They’re going to read it, someone’s going to rationalise it, but they’re not going to do anything about it.

 

And that’s because, I don’t really believe that the rational is that powerful at the moment. I think we’re in a very chaotic time where the rational seems to not work. I’m a very rational person. I’m obsessed with the rational. I’m obsessed with logic and truth and natural law. For some reason. I’m just obsessed. I’m built that way. And so being a White nationalist is so frustrating because the average person in society seems to not care about the truth!

 

They seem to not care about what’s rational and what’s reasonable. They don’t actually care. Nobody cares about that stuff. They care more about the football. And the football is irrational. Why are they all waving brown and yellow flags? Or why are they waving purple and yellow flags? These are irrational concepts. What the fuck has that purple, … It has no symbolic meaning. It’s not even local. So I talk to guys, you know, chippy [carpenter] at work, plumber at work. They say:

 

“Oh, what footy team do you go for?”

 

I go:

 

“Honestly, man, I don’t go for a footy team. What team do you go for?”

 

And they say:

 

“Oh, Brisbane Lions.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Oh, you’re from Brisbane?”

 

And they’re like:

 

“No, I just like, Brisbane Lions.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“What the fuck? You’re not even from Brisbane!”

 

It’s so irrational! But why do they like Brisbane Lions?:

 

“Oh, man, I like the lion, man. You know, I like lions. They had a fucking good team when I started, you know, watching the footy, or my uncle goes for them!”

 

It’s just so fucking irrational! If I was to go for a football team, I mean, I grew up in Balwyn*, you know, that, I would go for Balwyn Tigers or something. I would go for the local football team. That’s who I would go for!

 

[* Balwyn is a suburb of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 10 km east of Melbourne’s Central Business District, located within the City of Boroondara local government area. Balwyn recorded a population of 13, 495 at the 2021 census. The suburb’s post-European settlement character was initially agricultural with several large estates built around a small village centre. Since the early 20th century, farms and mansions gave way to suburban development as the population of Melbourne rapidly grew. Today Balwyn is almost entirely residential and one of Victoria’s most exclusive and affluent suburbs, regularly Ranking in the state’s top 10 most expensive suburbs. Wikipedia]

 

[1:24:13]

 

Blair Cottrell: Of course, obviously.

 

Thomas Sewell: You know, because that’s like, there’s guys that I worked with or guys that I went to school with that played for that team. So that’s who I would go for. That’s like a rational, but that’s like the minority.

 

So we’re living in an irrational time. Now. I can complain about that. I can seethe about that and go:

 

“Why is everyone so irrational?”

 

And pull all my hair out. Or I can maybe go:

 

“Okay, is this what Evola was talking about, riding the tiger?”

 

Like, yeah, it’s like, it’s not a rational situation. And if the irrational is so powerful right now, then maybe need to shock people with the irrational!

 

And I think there’s enough people doing the rational, and I don’t think they’re really getting anywhere. I think we need the dramatisation. I think we need the irrational. We need to evoke emotion! I think emotion in this time is far more in the chaos of everything that’s going on, it’s the only way to really speak to people.

 

Blair Cottrell: But I think what you represent is rational. So it’s almost like people are so irrational that the rational is shocking to them.

 

Joel Davis: And it’s like you can rationally describe, … I’ve spoken to so many people who rationally understand it’s the jews and the Holocaust was fake and Hitler’s been unfairly demonised, and the White race is being genocided, but they’re fucking pussies!

 

Thomas Sewell: They won’t do anything.

 

Joel Davis: They will never do anything because they’re fucking pussies! The Whiteman needs to go back some fucking balls! The Whiteman needs to go:

 

“You know what? We’re going to fucking do something about it. We’re going to fight back!”

 

Like, I spent the last couple days arguing in a Twitter space with a lot of these people who are red pilled on all the relevant subjects, but they don’t think that it’s possible for the Whiteman to take back his country, our countries. They don’t think that the Whiteman is capable of actually building a political movement on the basis of defending himself. They don’t think that! They have no belief in us. And every single guy in those, I mean, you can’t see people in Twitter Spaces, but every single guy who has that opinion, their voices were all the most piss weak, low testosterone voices in the Twitter space.

 

And then the guys that come in the Twitter space with a bit of fucking balls that you can hear, like, a bit of aggression in their voice, they’re all like:

 

“Fuck, yeah, I agree with you, Joel. Hail Hitler! Fuck these cucks!”

 

Like [Tom, [chuckling] ] so that’s ultimately what it comes down to. When Fuentes says:

 

“Are we going to be attracting the high IQ guys with our message, with our meathead strategy?”

 

I’m pretty high IQ. You know, its objectively true that I have a high IQ, but I’m going to go and hang out with the so-called meatheads, right? Because the meatheads have some fucking balls and they’re going to try and do something! I spent years trying to try to wrangle the high IQ intellectual types into doing anything, and you can’t!

 

Blair Cottrell: No.

 

Joel Davis: Because they have such a high IQ that they can rationalise everything.

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re too smart for that. They’re too smart for everything.

 

Joel Davis: Nothing will work! High IQ people are:

 

“Nothing will work!”

 

With all the reasons why nothing can ever work. Why:

 

“That doesn’t make sense and this won’t work. And you can’t do this!”

 

Blair Cottrell: And because faith, faith transcends reason.

 

Joel Davis: I’d rather have guys who go:

 

“Yeah, Joel, fuck yeah. Hail Hitler!”

 

And actually does something that I tell them to do because they’re like:

 

“All right, I believe in you seem like a Whiteman who’s smart and knows what you’re talking about. I’m gonna fucking do what you say!”

 

I’d much rather that, to be honest, because that person is gonna actually do something. They’re gonna actually put some kind of will into the world, put some chest into the world and actually take the fight to the enemy in some way. And if we can build thousands and thousands and tens of thousands and so on, and men like that that are willing to fight and sacrifice and put in the fucking work to build a political movement, to force a political movement into existence that actually stands for our race, now we’ve got a fucking fighting chance! Now we’ve got actually someone fighting in the corner of the Aryan and ready to actually take on the system, which we currently don’t have.

 

[1:28:08]

 

Blair Cottrell: The problem with being smart is its hard to really believe anything when you’re smart.

 

And so thank God that the majority of people aren’t smart because then it would be really hard to manage them because the majority of people believe things really easily. But Joel, I think you’re a pretty, like unique blend of someone who’s quite intelligent, but you’re also capable of believing and dedicating yourself to something. Right? That’s a good combination.

 

You brought up the footy, Tom. What do you guys think of that Aboriginal spokesperson who said that:

 

“‘Welcome to Country’* has been happening for 250,000 years!”

 

So apparently the abos have been around since, …

 

[* A Welcome to Country is a ritual or formal ceremony performed as a land acknowledgement at many events held in Australia. It is an event intended to highlight the cultural significance of the surrounding area to the descendants of a particular Aboriginal clan or language group who were recognised as the original human inhabitants of the area. For the Welcome to be recognised as official, it must be performed by a recognised elder of the group. Welcomes to Country are sometimes accompanied by traditional smoking ceremonies, music or dance. Where an elder is not available to perform the welcome, or there is not a recognised traditional owner, an Acknowledgement of Country may be offered instead. Since 2008, when it was made on the day before Prime Minister Kevin Rudd made the Apology to Australia’s Indigenous peoples, a Welcome to Country has been incorporated into the ceremonial opening of the Parliament of Australia, an event which occurs after each federal election. Wikipedia]

 

Joel Davis: Shall I play the clip Blair? Do you want, you want me to play the clip?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, sure. It’s only a quick one. You can bring it up and find it if you got it ready.

 

Joel Davis: Give me a minute to pull it up. I’ll get it.

 

Thomas Sewell: [words unclear] Keep going. Keep doing it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Just keep doing it. Like, never interrupt an enemy when they’re making a mistake.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, I’ve got a little strategy going on behind the scenes as to how I can, sort of how we can profit from this phenomenon. And I’ll explain what that is after we play the video. Yeah. 250,000 years Aboriginals have been doing it. Apparently they were here for 40,000 years before we got here. And then it was 50,000, then it was 70,000, and, 2000,000! But the meme remains, man! The mean remains true. Even if it is 250,000 years. 250,000 years, and invented a stick. Invented a stick! Yeah.

 

So I wouldn’t be proud of that! It’s like the longer you were here before we got here, the worse it looks for you. [chuckling]

 

But, yeah, this is it. Let’s play it.

 

Brendan Kerin (part abo): It’s not a ceremony that we’ve invented to cater for White people. It’s a ceremony we’ve been doing for 250,000 years plus, BC. And the BC stands for Before Cook [Captain Cook]. Prior to colonisation you could get yourself into a lot of trouble for walking on someone else’s lands without being welcomed onto those lands.

 

Blair Cottrell: I really like seeing those guys. The head turns, the reactions, the kind of like:

 

“What? What did he just say?”

 

And even the crowd didn’t know how to react, really. They’re on the edge there. They’re teetering on the edge of actually reacting. And next time they hear that, they might react. Right?

 

So this tickled me a little bit because I come from an AFL family, right? My father and grandfather were playing and my cousin’s playing for Carlton now. So I thought:

 

“Oh, I don’t like this. The boys should have done something about this. I thought maybe I could work some Scorpio magic and make something happen behind the scenes. I thought, I’ll make a little clip. I won’t send it to my cousin directly because he’ll be able to show the boys within the AFL community and maybe, …”

 

I think the grand final’s on this weekend, isn’t it? Maybe at the grand final there’ll be some sort of reaction? Who knows, maybe next season, whatever.

 

But the idea is that he doesn’t see it directly from me because then he’ll feel like I’m pulling his arm and he won’t want to show anyone. But if he comes across it. Because I haven’t spoken to him in a few years. If he comes across it by himself, if I can get it sent around enough, he’d be like:

 

“Oh, this is my cousin! Look at this, boys. He’s talking about the footy!”

 

You know what I mean? So that was the that was the plan with that? We’ll see if it comes to fruition over time.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but I mean, that’s egregious. He basically put out a threat that, like:

 

“Oh, well, if we don’t welcome you, then people would get in a lot of trouble!”

 

Like, as if. Like what are you implying? He’s basically implying a very deep hostility there.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Joel Davis: And what I always like to say to the Aboriginals is, if you’re not happy, if you don’t want to concede the loss, that, like:

 

“We won, you lost. We conquered. You got conquered. Suck shit!”

 

If you don’t like that equation and you want the country back, then let’s rematch! Let’s fucking rematch! Let’s go again! We can have it out again.

 

And this time the winner gets the country and the loser won’t exist anymore. It’s over! Like, it’s done! It’s finished! There’s not going to be any more toleration. And if we lose, fine, we could pack up and go back to England, or you can slaughter us all. I say that’s fair enough, because I don’t think you’re going to win! You’re going to have a bunch of abos and some, like, communist sympathizers or something, versus all of us that actually, every, like, Whiteman with some fucking balls and backbone. I think there’s only one winner in that situation. So I’m quite happy to do. To do a rematch.

 

And I know that they don’t! I know that they have absolutely no hope in hell and they know it, of winning a rematch. They’re just bitching and complaining! It’s a fucking victimocracy that we live in a complainocracy. And they know that the more and more that they bitch at the Whiteman, the more and more free shit they get given!

 

[1:33:09]

 

Blair Cottrell: But that’s what makes it even more cringe, the fact that these people that are paid to complain at these ceremonies, football games and stuff, they’re paid by the government to do that. They’re politically privileged, professional victims as I said in the video response that I posted to it. And that just makes it even more cringe, especially to the average Australian viewer who really doesn’t think much of the person who’s being put on a pedestal by the government. That’s not a real great way to get the average person in Australia to support your cause.

 

But, yeah, it ties into what Joel raised last time as “Aboriginal fatigue”. People are so fatigued by this. They’re so sick of it! Yeah, and Aboriginal fatigue is such a prominent thing now that even members for Parliament are speaking out against it. Even Pauline Hanson* stood up and said:

 

“Hey, let’s just ban this Welcome to Country stuff altogether.”

 

[* Pauline Hanson’s One Nation (PHON or ONP), also known as One Nation or One Nation Party, is a Right-wing populist political party in Australia. It is led by Pauline Hanson. One Nation was founded in 1997, by Member of Parliament Pauline Hanson and her advisors David Ettridge and David Oldfield after Hanson was disendorsed as a federal candidate for the Liberal Party of Australia. The disendorsement came before the 1996 federal election following comments she made about Indigenous Australians. Oldfield, a councillor on Manly Council in suburban Sydney and at one time an employee of Liberal minister Tony Abbott, was the organisational architect of the party. Hanson sat as an independent for one year before forming Pauline Hanson’s One Nation.]

 

Joel Davis: We don’t mean, like the Aboriginal asleep on a park bench at 10:00 in the morning because the bottle shop opens at 8:30 kind of fatigue. I mean the White fatigue are dealing with this shit!

 

But the thing is with this whole issue, it’s basically just a humiliation ritual, like, over and over and over and over again! And it’s the kind of thing where, like all of those football players, as you described, that are standing there and just taking it like every single one of them is a fucking pussy! Because you can see it on the faces of a lot of the White players that they don’t appreciate it, but then they’re on a million dollar contract and they don’t want to lose that million dollar contract. So they just have to stand there and cop it like good little goys.

 

When is someone going to show some balls and stand up? I thought Blair’s call to action was quite good. You know, if as soon as any White celebrity of any kind actually takes a stand against this, we’re going to be there behind them. Maybe [chuckling] they don’t want us behind him! Maybe to make it worse for them, but fuck it! We’ll be there behind him supporting them. Because I could see it being one of these cascade reactions where if one person is willing to be the first lemming to jump off the cliff, then there could be a pile on it. Could be quite a powerful move.

 

Blair Cottrell: I do think footy banners would be effective, too, something we could explore in the future. We did a footy banner back in the day and it caused huge [chuckling] upset and we were banned for life from the MCG! I don’t know how they intend to implement that ban. But I haven’t been back since. I haven’t tried to go back.

 

Joel Davis: Have you got an idea for a slogan.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know, like something we could discuss in private, I guess. I probably already showed my cards too directly on that one. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: I thought about would it be funny to streak the grand final? But the tickets are so expensive. So, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I think it’s best to wait to see if one of the players, or I even like a few of the players, walk off or do something. And if nothing happens, because this will get worse, they’ll keep pushing. These Aboriginals are never happy. They’ll go out there and say something even worse next time they get the opportunity to time the representatives for their community hired by the government, who are like 10% Aboriginal, 90% White, but identify entirely with their Aboriginal heritage! Even though Aboriginal heritage, people from that heritage are supposedly so oppressed. But White people are privileged. However, they choose to disavow all their privilege and just identify with the oppressed clan for some reason. It’s all bullshit!

 

But the point is that it’s going to get worse!

 

And I think if the players don’t do anything, if the clubs don’t do anything, it’s probably some, like some banner time, then it might be time to show up.

 

Joel Davis: The clubs are all [word unclear]

 

Blair Cottrell: The clubs themselves won’t, but the players might. But the problem with the players is they’re very soldierly. That’s the way they’re trained. And so they won’t do anything unless it’s as a unit. One of them won’t just whimsically walk off on his own. He’ll wait for the boys to. It’d have to be like a collaborative effort, a planned thing that happens behind closed doors between the players that have to discuss it, talk about it, how they’re going to do it, keep it to themselves. It’s unlikely, but there’s still a small possibility it could happen.

 

Joel Davis: Whoever wants to lead it, though, they can become a hero. Like, yeah, you might end up, you’re going to get a lot of controversy, but you’ll become a hero of the Australian people if you, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, yeah! Put it this way, you’ll be the most famous footballer of our era and not for having played good football. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But yeah, but I support the fake Aboriginals. Like, you know, people say:

 

“Oh, look, there’s always people taking all these Aboriginal benefits and they’re just White people that are pretending to be Aboriginals. I support it. I think every White person, if you can, become a fake Aboriginal, get all the Aboriginal money. And the more of us that could become fake Aboriginals, the more of a mockery we can make of this whole thing. We should have the maximized amount of White fraud of the Aboriginal, …”

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve got too much pride, man! I’ve got so much pride to do that. I can’t get around saying, I’m Aboriginal. I just can’t do it. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, you don’t have to outwardly, you know, present yourself to the public as an Aboriginal.

 

But, yeah, we need the Abo-Saxon race must rise! The Abo-Saxon tribe, …

 

[1:38:08]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, they ask you that everywhere. They ask you that everywhere in Australia:

 

“Are you of Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander descent?”

 

When you’re going for a job, when you’re going into education, when you’re going into jail, they ask you all the time.

 

And I’ve always wondered, like, I never understood before I got into politics. I wondered, why do they keep asking me that? And now I know, like, there’s all these special privileges you get if you are of those descents, but it’s just something I’ve got too much pride to try to exploit, personally.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, fair enough.

 

So we should maybe cover some, like, stories in the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Tom mentioned that he wanted to bring up. The event that we went to on the weekend, because I don’t know if you’ve seen Joel.

 

Joel Davis: No, no, no! I think we should avoid talking about that, actually. Let’s not talk about that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why? Well, it’s been in the news today just recently. There’s a big article on it because the restaurant owner has I don’t know. Do you want to bring it up or not? We don’t have to.

 

Joel Davis: I think we should avoid it. I should avoid the subject.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. It’s up to you.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Let’s have a look here. What’s going on? Well, there was the story.

 

So basically, the Premier of, I mean whenever we talk about Australian politicians, it’s just like racial cuckoldry to the max! I mean, it’s so bad.

 

So this is the Victorian remier, what’s her name? Jacinta Allen. She has promised to reserve 25% of the state’s regional work visas for international students, putting them on track to stay in Australia permanently. So she’s basically met with the Indians and is trying to facilitate helping more Indians exploit our immigration system to move into regional areas. So, like, White flight isn’t an option. Like, people think:

 

“Oh, just get out of the cities, move to the country towns!”

 

Yeah, well, the government is sending Indians to you, too! There’s really no escape from this. At some point we’re going to have to stop White flighting and start fighting back.

 

But, yeah, like, it’s kind of also somewhat unprecedented or rarely precedent for the state government to intervene on immigration and try and overpower, like, get involved in what is supposed to be a federal issue.

 

But, you know, of course she went over to India, met with the Indians, and every time an Australian politician goes to meet with the Indians, they always come back with the promise to bring more Indians into Australia. Like, why is the Indian government so intent on trying to facilitate sending their people into our country? It’s like, it must be some kind of strategy. Like, the Indian government must have realised:

 

“Like, fuck! Like, we’ve got 1.4 billion people. They’ve got like 26 million or whatever, and they’re stupid enough to take hundreds of thousands of us every single year. If we just keep shipping them in, eventually we can just colonise Australia. We wouldn’t even have to fight a war or anything. We can just keep dumping them in there, dumping them in there, dumping them in there for the next 20 years, and eventually we’ll just take over!”

 

And our government is like:

 

“Yes!”

 

Like just totally complicit in it. Why? Like, what even leverage did they really have over us, the Indian government? They don’t have any really ostensible leverage. It’s just like pure cuckoldry. It’s insane! Like, yeah, we’re in like some kind of vague military alliance with them. And I’m sure there’s some kind of backhanded deals they do with our politicians, but they’re trying to win some Indian votes. Obviously, the Labor Party specifically has identified the fact that Indians vote Labour at much higher rates than the average.

 

So if you can get a White electorate and you can stuff enough Indians in it, you can flip it from voting more Right-wing to voting Labour. And it can become a solid Labour seat because a lot of the White Leftists are voting Greens now. So Labour seems to be just tripling down on importing voters from India rather than trying to figure out how to appeal to the people who already live here to the White Australians.

 

But, yeah, it’s pretty fucking disgusting!

 

Allen, you were telling me, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, Jacinta Allen’s from Bendigo. I think she grew up there. And so she took a particular, well, she was particularly disdainful of our activism in Bendigo. And then she became Transport Minister while Daniel Andrews was premier.

 

And obviously she was pretty chummy with Andrews, because she ended up taking over the job of premier after he., … What did he do? I think he stepped down for some reason, but I don’t know. I won’t divert from the story too much, but Jacinta Allen, while she was Minister for Transport, was the minister who banned Sky News from all public spaces over which government had jurisdiction, such as trains and train stations, because I’d been on Sky News and she was worried that someone might see the interview of me on Sky News. [chuckling] So she’s totally against free speech. She’s totally pro-system, anti-worker, anti-Australian people. She doesn’t want the Australian people to have any real representation.

 

So it’s no surprise that she’s doing shit like this. It’s just classic, just Jacinta Allen, just classic systemite, bureaucrat shit! And this is exactly why we need a complete overhaul of our political system. Total revolution! We can’t work within its parameters necessarily, because there’s people like this at the helm. Like Jacinta Allen is now the premier of our state. And this is someone who’s extremely hostile, not just to the politics we represent, but to the Australian working class. Right?

 

[1:44:02]

 

And it reminds me of Yuri Bezmenov* lecture when he said:

 

“Your country’s been thoroughly subverted and prepared for total destabilisation and takeover when the people who have power are actually hated or despised by the voters, by the working class.”

 

So the masses, despite the fact that despite them hating their leaders so much, the leaders are still in power somehow, and yet there’s supposed to be a democracy. That’s apparently the point at which your country’s on its knees. It’s been thoroughly subverted from within. And I suppose that’s the position that our country’s in right now, unfortunately.

 

[* Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov (December 11, 1939 – January 5, 1993) was a Soviet journalist for Novosti Press Agency. In 1970, as a member of the Soviet mission in New Delhi, India, Bezmenov defected to the West and was re-settled in Canada pursuant to an arrangement between American and Canadian security agencies. Wikipedia]

 

But there’s silver linings to this. Because the book I’m reading of, just about finished reading by David Kilcullen, describes the fitness effects, which I’ve talked about to some degree on a couple of spaces recently. The fitness effect is a phenomenon where a group or organisation, a philosophy, people who represent a philosophy, whatever it may be, it’s the same for criminal gangs, sometimes. There needs to be an appropriate amount of consistent pressure in order for the group to respond to adaptation and overcome that pressure in time. If there’s not enough pressure, the group can stagnate. If there’s too much pressure, it can be crushed completely. But I tend to think that we have just enough pressure in order to effectively adapt to and overcome our adversaries at this point, if things remain on the trajectory they’re currently on, I feel it’s the perfect amount of pressure for us to.

 

And it’s an exciting thought. What we could actually learn. We’re being forced to adapt to an enemy, which is putting that appropriate amount of pressure on us. And what’s exciting is how powerful we may become so long as we survive as a race.

 

I think the reason why our race is being targeted for extermination is because that’s the only way to guarantee defeat against White people generally or against, you know, descendants of Europe.

 

If they’re given the same opportunity to procreate, flourish, develop, they eventually become master of the world. And so to defeat them, you have to actually annihilate their race. You have to impose a plan of genocide onto them. And that’s exactly why our adversaries today are doing that. Because if we live as a race, we win. We win eventually! We adapt and win. So all we have to do is survive, and victory is guaranteed!

 

So they understand that, too, I think, which is why the genocide programs are in place.

 

Joel Davis: And the main thing that has held White people back, particularly in recent years, is that we’re too fucking nice. And what White people are learning through this process is that the morality of being the nice guys of the world is ultimately not fit to survive. That the people who want to hold on to that are going to die! Every single institution, culturally, socially, etcetera, that wants to hold on to the “nice guy” morality of the White cuck is going to die with the White cuck. And all that’s going to remain is the “No More Mr Nice Guy, White Guy”.

 

All that’s going to remain is the Whiteman who finds his balls and regains a sense of brutality and regains a sense of the necessity that struggle survival, is not up for debate.

 

Now, I’ve been rereading Schmitt’s concept of the political lately, and one point that he makes about war. He criticises what’s called “just war theory”, which comes out of the Catholic tradition, and Roman law, which is basically what legally justifies a military action. Under what conditions could a war be said to be just or unjust? And Schmitt criticises that notion. He says that war currently be understood in terms of morality, because war is fundamentally existential.

 

In other words, war is not justified by morality. War is justified by the necessity to survive. That there is an enemy which is negating your way of life. And your choice is either to fight or to basically succumb and ultimately lose your existence in this world. And that’s the only ultimate justification for being willing to fight to the death with an opponent, which is that you’re being challenged to the death. Your existence is being challenged on the existential level.

 

So that is what is happening to White people writ large.

 

And so we’re going to have to develop a culture, a morality, a way of life that adapts, a politics that adapts to that environment, a politics which simply asserts our existential interest, our necessity to survive to the exclusion of all other concerns. And that’s ultimately why I am a National Socialist, because that really is the essence of National Socialism.

 

This idea that this world is a world of eternal struggle, the recognition that nature ultimately rewards those who will fight for their existence and punishes those who won’t. And Adolf Hitler himself said, like, basically, to paraphrase:

 

“Those who will not fight for their existence in this world of eternal struggle deserve to die and will die.”

 

And so that is ultimately the problem holding back White people is that when they look at politics, they look at politics often in terms of morality or in terms of this kind of practical desire, which is kind of the outward presentation, but inwardly as a form of cowardice, which is basically conflict avoidance:

 

“Can we all just get along? What is conservatism? Can we stop doing this identity politics thing? It’s freaking me out. It’s pitting one group against the other and it’s going to end up leading to conflict. And we can’t have conflict. Can’t we all just be individuals? Can’t we all just focus upon how we all pay tax and how we all work hard and we all have families to go home to? And can’t we all just existence pure economic actors, and not become political, not have identities, not be posed against one another in any kind of struggle? Because that’s freaking me out, man!”

 

That’s basically what conservatism is, trying to eliminate existential reality from politics and try and negotiate some kind of agreement of how everyone can all get along.

 

But the reality is that there’s not going to be an agreement as to how everyone can get along. Ultimately, we’re going to have to fight. All of human history has been, there’s two groups. Ultimately, one group’s way of life is negated by the other group’s way of life because they can’t both dominate the same territory. And so they’re going to have to fight over who gets to control it. And if someone’s going to win and someone’s going to lose and maybe one group is afraid to fight. So they cuck and subordinate themselves, and they’re destroyed by their own subordination.

 

[1:50:53]

 

 

And part of being a Whiteman, an Aryan, is that you come from a bloodline that refuse to cuck. An Aryan means to be a man of honour. That’s what Aryan comes from the word “ayah”, which means the honourable or the noble. We are the honourable race, the noble race. Meaning our race, never subordinated ourselves to another race. That’s why we have pure blood. Because we were never subordinated as slaves to anyone, and then bred with other groups and ultimately subsumed into some, like, completely different thing than what we organically are. No, we are a noble race. Our ancestors conquered. They weren’t conquered. They did the conquering.

 

And now what is happening is that we’re effectively being conquered.

 

And it’s like if you want to stay, if you want your descendants to ultimately retain their Aryanness, to retain their honour, to retain their blue eyes and their light, their fair hair and their fair skin, and the nobility of their blood, then you’re gonna have to fucking fight, to ensure that you’re not just an individual with rights under the Constitution. And you’re gonna have to fight to ensure that your people run your own fucking country! That your people run their own fucking empire! That’s the only guarantee of your freedom and the freedom of your progeny and your. And your posterity in this world is being in charge of your own shit! Running your own shit with no one else outside having the ability to come in and intervene and tell you what to do.

 

So that’s the Whiteman that is going to survive. The Whiteman who comes to terms with that reality.

 

So the only form of White culture that is really going to survive what is happening to us right now is the full Nazi mode, Whiteman! Which is why that’s what I’ve decided to be, and what we’ve kind of decided to become. Because we recognise that that’s the only kind of Whiteman that’s ultimately going to get out of this shit!

 

All the other kind of cuck strategies that all the other Whites are going to do, they’re going to fucking die with those strategies. Because all those strategies lead to mongrelisation, miscegenation, subordination, conquest, and so on. Becoming minorities, becoming persecuted minorities, losing control of the political system, and controlled by jews and other foreign interests, essentially over your destiny, over your countries, over your way of life, and the destruction of your culture, the destruction of your dignity, the destruction of everything that will guarantee an existence in this world which is dignified and honourable and ultimately your own.

 

So I talked about this a few streams ago. When we’re talking about World War Two revisionism, I talked about what freedom fundamentally means. I feel like that’s a point that’s really important to reiterate. That the word “free”, like, if you look at the Indo Aryan root, etymologically, of the word “free”, it comes from the same root, “pri”, I think, is the root in the Indo Aryan root language. Which is the root word that ultimately leads to the goddess Freyr*. In the Germanic languages, or in Germanic Paganism, Freyr is the goddess of love.

 

[* Freyr/Freya One of the principal deities of the Norse pantheon, the lovely and enchanting Freya was a goddess of blessings, love, lust, and fertility. A member of the Vanir tribe of deities, Freya shared her people’s penchant for the magical arts of divination. It was Freya who introduced the gods to seidr, a form of magic that allowed practitioners to know and change the future. Freya was gentler and more agreeable than the other Norse deities. Where Thor accomplished his goals through aggression and Odin and Loki resorted to trickery, Freya achieved her ends with the gentler persuasions of gifts, beauty, and sex. While Freya was often unselfish and helpful, she did have a darker side. Like the male gods, Freya had a taste for blood and fought fiercely in battle. It was said she took the lives of half the warriors ever slain in battle. https:// mythopedia.com/topics/freya]

 

And basically, the etymology of freedom and the etymology of love is the same in the Germanic languages. In other words, we understood what it meant to be a free man, to be beloved by the community. In other words, if he is a free man, he is a man that we love. In other words, he is our kin. He is our kinsman.

 

And so when you live in the land of your kinsman, you are given your freedoms because you are beloved by your community, because you are part of the family, you’re part of the ethnic group, you’re part of the nation. And we, as a people, give a dignity to all the members of our race, of our stock.

 

They understood that freedom wasn’t this abstract concept, therefore, of you’re free because people leave you alone. No, you’re free because you are loved by your people and because your people make you free. You can’t be free as an individual in this world because you’re a social animal and you’re subject to all of these, you know much larger organisations of men that are composed of thousands and millions of people, and they will crush you as an individual unless you have an organisation of thousands and millions of men that will defend you as an individual. So your freedom comes from your people’s freedom. Your destiny is tied up with your people.

 

And that’s why ultimately, for me, race is the essential principle of my politics. Because we get out of this as White men or we die as White men, there isn’t going to be an alternative.

 

[1:55:23]

 

Blair Cottrell: Good stuff. We’ve been streaming for a while now. We’re approaching the two hour mark. We’ve got a few Superchats from Rumble to go through. How are you guys feeling? You feeling like you want to continue? You want to start wrapping it up? What do you think?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I wouldn’t mind asking Tom a question because I want to get his take on before we get to the Superchats. I’m sure he’s seen a lot of the discourse on this, working with other races, multiracial alliances, and people bring up things like:

 

“Oh, well, George Lincoln Rockwell and the American Nazi Party went and sent their leadership to the Black Panther conference or whatever the fuck and they were willing to work together and Hitler allied himself with non-Whites and in World War Two and blah, blah, blah. And so we should look to make multiracial alliances.”

 

My retort to that is like:

 

“Yeah, I don’t actually mind making an alliance with Japan or with some other, like, non-White foreign country, if that makes sense militarily.”

 

But I don’t really want to be making alliances with non-White immigrants in my own country unless they are basically part of some project to move themselves back to wherever the fuck they came from. Then I’d be willing to work with them because they’re like, literally trying to get their people the fuck away from my people. But outside of that, I really don’t want anything to do with them. Do you think that’s too hard line of a position, or do you have an alternative take? I’m curious. I don’t think we’ve really gone over, like, your doctrine on this issue.

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ve used the term “defensive pact” as opposed to alliance. I think you can have a non-Aggression pact. Like, I feel like as a movement, it would strategically make sense here in Australia to not have any antagonistic relationship with, say, the Christian Assyrians that are currently the only other community in this country, despite the fact that they’re not actually White. They’re Caucasian, but they’re not European. They’re Assyrians. They’re kind of as White as Arabs get. They’re like the really White Arabs, and that’s why they’re Christians instead of Muslims, because they’re not as, like they’re probably closer to the genetic stock of the people of the Middle East prior to the Islamic rape gang coming in from Arabia. And they are more or less in line with probably 90% of what we believe. The only major difference is that obviously they’re not European. They’re kind of like 90% European, maybe genetically at best. At absolute best.

 

And so I believe in a non-Aggression with them. I don’t want to antagonise them. When they had that terrorist attack happen to them where one of their priests got attacked by the Muslim terrorist and got stabbed in the head, obviously the cops came down really hard on them and you know, attacked them and arrested a whole bunch of them out the front of their church. They’ve actually organised a lot of protests in Sydney as well. They’re a very large community and they’re very militant. They’re a very militant Christian militant community. I just wish that White Christians were as militant and as strong and as tight knit as the Assyrian Christians were in Sydney.

 

So that’s like an example where I don’t think it would be against my values to have a coffee with these kinds of people and talk about how we can defensively work together. But I don’t really want any alliances with non-Europeans. They can be the last to go back to Assyria or Syria. They can go first class. You know, the jews can pay for it. I mean, you know what I mean? Like, we can look after them, but they can’t stay here, ultimately. But I want to be respectful to them.

 

And then there’s groups that I have absolutely no interest in being respectful to. Like, I have no interest in being respectful to the Africans, the Muslims. The, I mean, the Muslims are a mixed bag in themselves. There’s a lot of different sects of Islam. Some you can be semi-respectful to, and most you can’t. They’re pieces of shit!

 

What else? Islanders, again, Islanders are a mixed bag. I try not to make it complicated to specifically ask the question regarding the historical take of Rockwell. I support almost everything that Rockwell did, and it was maybe more of a PR campaign to do that.

 

Also, he was supporting a group that was segregating. So it’s relevant to the politics of the day that Rockwell went to the Nation of Islam, met with the Nation of Islam, and it was a group of black people that were ultimately trying to segregate themselves from the rest of society. So Rockwell’s main enemy was Martin Luther King, who was obviously trying to desegregate America and make sure all the little black kids and all the little White kids grew up together, which is obviously, we’re in the result of that now, that dystopia.

 

So it makes sense to me to have a kind of defensive relationship like Rockwell with the Nation of Islam, to say:

 

“Well, look, we actually kind of want a similar thing, and we can get to restructuring America when one of us are actually, politically, relevant, when we’re actually in power. In the meantime there’s no need to assassinate each other. We’ve got enough enemies.”

 

So that’s kind of how I feel about certain non-White groups. It’s like I don’t want to go to war with them at this stage because my primary enemy is the traitors within the Australian government. That’s the primary enemy, in my opinion! The jewish lobby are going to do what they’re going to do, and they’re very, extremely powerful. But the primary issue is, as White people, we need a clean house. We need to have respect and dignity again. And I don’t think any of these conversations with any of these non-White groups is going to be from a position of dignity. So that’s why I don’t have them. I don’t have any relationships with non-White groups.

 

That’s why I think it’s ridiculous when people do. I think it’s ridiculous when, I mean, Rockwell had respect, Rockwell had dignity, and America had a lot more dignity back then. So it kind of made a little bit of sense.

 

And I won’t even open the can of worms, which is Hitler, World War Two, because we’ve covered that on stream before and we’ve extensively talked about the geopolitical strategy and significance of all the different possibilities of World War Two. What if he allied with this instead of that? You know, it’s just no point.

 

But before I hand the mic back over, we kind of skimmed through a bunch of things. I know we are coming to a close for tonight, but there is Superchats. I actually had on a list of topics that the Moira Deeming [sp]. I don’t know how to pronounce name. Moira Deeming defamation trial, 15 day trial has been going through the courts. It’s all over the media at the moment here in Australia, Americans will have no idea what we’re talking about. But we can go into it. I can at least give a quick rundown even if we don’t want to discuss it. But just quickly update everyone on what’s happening with the Moira Deeming trial.

 

[2:02:41]

 

 

Joel Davis: Isn’t it Moira?

 

Thomas Sewell: Moira?

 

Joel Davis: Moira.

 

Thomas Sewell: Moira?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s a strange name. It doesn’t seem like a White name.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I don’t know what it is, actually, but, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Looks like it spells Maori and she’s a part Maori as well. It’s quite a strange name.

 

But anyway, apparently she’s a little bit jewish as well. But that’s kind of irrelevant. I’ll just go into it.

 

So when we did the Destroy Pedo Freaks rally at the Parliament steps, there was a Let Women Speak rally going on at the same time. We were aware of that rally happening obviously. There were trans exclusionary radical feminists. So they’re like, second or 2.5 wave feminists. There’s a difference between second wave feminism and third wave feminism. They’re kind of bordering on third wave feminism, but they’re against the woke culture of what you could describe as, like, this fourth wave feminism where they’re accepting trannies and they want trannies in bathrooms and trannies in women’s sport and stuff like that.

 

Anyway, so they were having a protest against that. We thought it’d be a good idea to be like:

 

“Yeah, well, we’re not against trannies in women’s sport. That’s the least of our issues. We’re against trannies in general. Let’s hit the nail on the head instead of dancing around the primary issue.”

 

And because we went down to that rally, Moira Deeming, who was a Liberal Party MP, actually got stood down from the Liberal Party. And she was described by the leader of the Liberal Party, or the leader of the opposition as a Nazi, or at least being sympathetic to Nazis when she wasn’t.

 

And so now Moira Deeming, my understanding is she’s suing John Prosecco for defamation. And it’s a 15 day trial, and they’re going through all the evidence, and 90% of the evidence is just talking about us. 90% of the evidence is just like:

 

“These are Nazis. These are, in fact, Nazis. These are Nazis doing Roman salutes. These are Nazis on the Parliament steps doing Roman salutes. This is a speech from Thomas Sewell describing why he’s against paedophiles and trannies.”

 

Honestly, it’s a very interesting trial, and it’s been all over the news. And it just shows the relevance and it shows the dialectic. Like, it shows that we’re an unavoidable heavyweight in politics, despite our seeming irrelevance and minuscule size. Like, just being near us is like, it’s causing implosions with than the Liberal Party. And that’s telling. That’s telling. And these trials will set precedence. And it changes the dynamic. It’s a spanner in the works, a little bit of chaos, which I can’t help but feel quite happy about. I like the chaos of these rodent, rat, traitor politicians! I like that there’s chaos amongst them.

 

But they don’t know how to mentally gymnastic their way out of these associations, and they’re turning on each other. You know, one side of the party turns on the other side of the party because one side was standing in the vicinity of Nazis. Fascinating stuff!

 

Joel Davis: I just want to say that I looked up the word, the name “Moira”, and apparently it is of Greek and Irish origin. In Greek, it translates to “destiny”.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s an old fashioned name.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So I don’t want to slander a Greek name with negative, but I think it’s kind of like the Greek version of the name Mary, but also somewhat adopted by the Irish.

 

Blair Cottrell: Regarding, like, have you guys ever got the feeling when you’re talking to Muslims that you’re talking to like, a sleazy used car salesman? That they’re not being genuine?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And I think the reason I sense that from them is I was thinking about this tonight. This will be my final point before I start getting ready to sign out. I suppose. It’s because they’re kind of only geared to recruit or kill you and I wrote about this on Twitter at some stage or xdev, and I was thinking also about the word “convert” and how no one actually really converts in any true sense to Islam, especially not when you’re a White guy. Right? Because think about it. What are you converting? You’re not converting. You’re not changing into anything else. You’re still White with White predispositions. You still got these thousands of years of Christian or Catholic history behind you, probably. Maybe something else.

 

But the point is that even if you think you’re converting to a different religion all you’re really choosing to do is prioritize different thoughts and perspectives of reality, but physically, nothing actually changes. It’s just your ideas inside your head that are converted.

 

And so there’s no real physical or measurable conversion which takes place. Then I started realizing that Muslims don’t want anyone to convert. They want the to submit! You don’t convert to Islam, you submit to it! And Islam being a foreign camp, what are you doing when you’re converting to Islam? You’re submitting to a foreign camp, to a foreign force, foreign to your nation, foreign to your culture, foreign to your spirit!

 

And I think the Muslims are aware of this. That’s why when they’re trying to sell Islam as something that is desirable for you feel like you’re being conned by a salesman, because that’s exactly what’s happening.

 

[2:08:17]

 

Joel Davis: Well, I mean, that also says something about the Islamic races themselves, that they’re all the descendants of people who submitted. Like they didn’t have the dignity to hold on to their older traditions or die an honourable death, but instead just cucked to Allah.

 

So really, like these people that are proud to be Muslim. Like, you’re a cuck! Like, the fact that you’re a Muslim, that your parents are Muslim, that your grandparents are Muslims, you know, it means ultimately you descend from someone who cucked and bowed down.

 

Blair Cottrell: I have respect for Islam only because it has like a powerful foothold in the world. I mean, you can’t really deny that whoever Muhammad was a significant character because isn’t it something like a quarter of the world’s population strive to live in his image today?

 

So you can’t really dispute that there’s respect there that you have to have, but you have to have that respect for it as a force that’s outside of your own camp.

 

Joel Davis: It’s a powerful force. Yeah, but it’s disgusting! Like, I don’t have any respect for it in terms on, like, a human level. On a human level, it is a religion for low IQ mongrels. It’s a religion for fucking sand nigger retards! Let’s be real.

 

I mean, the Quran, Islamic philosophy, this stuff is not very refined. It’s not befitting of a high IQ, spiritually deep person. And Muhammad himself was just a paedophile warlord. He wasn’t like some profound mystic or something. So to have him as your religious leader is embarrassing. It really is. So, yeah, I got no respect for Muslims. Zero, actually.

 

Blair Cottrell: I didn’t know that you were so anti-Islam, Joel. I thought maybe you might see eye to eye with them on a few things, but.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I mean, there’s some things we could see eye to eye on in the sense of like there’s prohibitions against usury and throwing the fags off buildings is kind of funny.

 

But ultimately, you know, these are superficial things.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, good chat, boys. I’m glad we had it. I do want to move on to Superchats. We’ve got a bunch from Rumble, and I can’t see them anywhere except Rumble. So we can start with Rumble. Are we ready to sign off?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, let’s do the Superchats.

 

By the way, some people send me some Superchats on Entropy. Entropy reloaded, and I don’t know how to pull them back up.

 

So if you are watching and you sent me an Entropy Superchat, I have one here from Grim Grandpa who just said:

 

“White fucking power!”

 

So I got that one.

 

But all the ones before that, like people sent them before the show started. And then when the show started, it reloaded and I lost the ones that were sent before the show started, before I could read them off.

 

So if you’re offended by that, you want your Superchat, read out please just send me a DM and so I can. I don’t actually remember what you said so that I can read it out for the on the next episode or send it to me quickly now. We can read it on this episode if you’re watching live. I know it’s a little bit boomer tech, but yeah, I just can’t figure out in Entropy exactly where to find it. I’m in the middle of a stream, so I can’t dick around looking for it anyway.

 

But we do have some from Odysee, so I’ll read those out and then we’ll do the Rumble ones. Gaelic Glory said:

 

“Moira is an anglicisation of an Irish name, basically of Mary. I’m an Irish buck. Moving to Australia next year. Can I become a part of the movement?”

 

Yes, if you move to Australia and you’re a Whiteman, you can be included. We do actually have people who were born in Ireland and have Irish accents and were born in England and have English accents in the organisation. And being an Irishman or an Englishman who moves to Australia is pretty standard. It’s part of Australian culture. It always has been, because that’s basically what Australia is. It’s just like a resettlement programme for Anglo Celts on the opposite side of the world. So of course you can be included as long as you meet all the relevant criteria. Filled Soda said:

 

“I say I’ve got catching up to do as there are some episodes missing on Odysee. I wish there was something like your organisation here. All those people died during the troubles. Now they’re giving it all away.”

 

Obviously this is another Irishman.

 

Yeah, I mean, there is an Irish nationalist scene, but there’s nothing really quite like us, I guess, as far as I know. So you can join your friend in moving to Australia if you want to come and join us as well. But yeah, and honoured to see that.

 

[2:13:02]

 

On Odysee I had issues with re-uploading after the streams, so if you want to watch the replays of the streams, check it out on Rumble. And now actually, I’ll be putting every stream will be up on Twitter, so you can also watch the streams back on Twitter. And you can also, if you want to listen back to the audio of each stream, you can get the audio which will be uploaded. The Telegram channel is basically T.me/JoelandBlair, and it’s just called The Joel and Blair Show archive Telegram channel.

 

If you want to catch audio replays, people like that for listening back at work, like, or putting it on in the background. And Filled Soda actually send another Superchat, he said:

 

“Glad to catch another stream live here in Belfast. I’ve got some catching up to do over on Rumble 1488.”

 

Yeah. So the same guy. Yeah. So catch the replays over on Rumble.

 

But, yeah, that’s all the Odysee Superchats. Blair, do you want to read the Superchats?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, sure, man. We’ll do the Rumble next. Is that what’s up?

 

The first one is from Jake Sake. Sends $2. Thanks, mate. $2:

 

“Thanks for fighting against the migrant brown horde scum flooding this great nation!”

 

You’re very welcome, my friend. Fellow Comrade, regular supporter of the show, sends $10. Thanks very much, Fellow Comrade. He says:

 

“NSN have been labelled a threat to social cohesion by mainstream media, but they are one of the only groups actually pushing for real social cohesion.”

 

Interesting perspective. Everything is upside down.

 

Joel Davis: So it’s like when they say, … I was arguing with these multiracial alliance retards, and they were saying:

 

“Oh, it’s the jews turn us against each other. They turn the Whiteman against the black man because they want to divide us so that we don’t take down the jew.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Well, no, nature divides us.”

 

Because they were calling me a Fed or insinuating that I’m a secret jewish operative because I’m a White nationalist. Like, wait, wait, wait! Jews were afraid of White nationalism. That’s why they brought the fucking brown people here in the first place! To dilute the population and prevent us from forming a cohesive identity that can reject the jews.

 

And you can see in Australia, this is explicitly true in Australian history, the development of Australian quote, unquote, “multiculturalism”. Jewish community leaders back in the early 1950s, before the White Australia Policy was repealed, were saying this:

 

“That we in the jewish community are kind of concerned about how we’re kind of excluded by this Anglo Christian society that we live in. We’re the outsiders. And so what we want to do is we want to push for immigration to be opened up to other types of foreigners so that we’re not the odd man out anymore, because then there’s going to be a bunch of Asians and Indians and blacks and blacks, blah, blah blah. And then all of a sudden, the jews just are just one group among many and we’re no longer the odd man out.”

 

And then they pursued that strategy very effectively, pushing into politics, ultimately getting in control of the Immigration Department in the 1970s and opening Australia’s borders.

 

So there’s a really good article on The Occidental Observer. If you guys don’t know what The Occidental Observer is, Google that shit right now and go there. It’s a brilliant resource. There’s great articles there from a lot of really good intellectuals. Andrew Joyce, Kevin MacDonald, many other great authors.

 

There’s a great article on there and it’s a I think it’s like a five part series called The War on White Australia. It’s written by Brenton Sanderson. And that five part article details the kind of history, basically, of jewish subversion of White Australian society.

 

 

It is a brilliant resource that everyone who is interested in the specificness of the Australian JQ, so to speak, the Australian jewish question, that article is one of the best resources to kind of give you a good overview. I recommend you go and read that and check out that site in general. That will give you a lot of really good knowledge, particularly on the jewish question. A lot of brilliant articles on there.

 

But yes, no, the jew hasn’t turned us against them. We’re turned against them naturally, by virtue of the fact that we’re fucking different. They had different blood, different culture, different everything. We’re not supposed to be in a society with them.

 

So, yes, if you want social cohesion, the best way to have it is to have racial cohesion!

 

Blair Cottrell: Our next Superchat is from Mr Anglo. Sends in $5. Thanks, Mr Anglo. He says:

 

“Hey, lads, great stream as always. Take this advice from an English nationalist on how to view all Muslims. They are all just anthro-Arab jews, aka, they are just as deceitful but more thuggish and apishe!”

 

Okay, I’ll take that on board, mate. Thanks. We’ve got $5 from Jake Sake, who’s reaching a little bit deeper into his pockets this time. Thanks, mate. He says:

 

“Who are the top three jews in Australia that are orchestrating the invasion of Australia by these brown horde parasites?”

 

Who are they, boys? The top three most influential, powerful jews in Australia. Who would they be?

 

 

[Image: Times of Israel, May 2018 – https://www.timesofisrael.com/5-of-the-7-wealthiest-people-in-australia-are-jewish/]

 

Thomas Sewell: Pratt, Heidler,[sp] …

 

[2:18:51]

 

Joel Davis: Triguboff*. He’s like, I think he’s now demoted to number three on the rich list. But he is the richest property developer in Australia.

 

[* Harry Oskar Triguboff is an Australian billionaire real estate developer, and one of Australia’s richest people. He is the founder and managing director of Meriton and is known as “high-rise Harry”. As of May 2023, The Australian Financial Review assessed Triguboff as the fourth richest Australian by net worth, estimated at A$23.80 billion, as published in the 2023 Rich List. Wikipedia]

 

And so he doesn’t just love immigration because he’s a jew that wants to genocide the White race and replace us in our own country, but also because he wants the benefits of the property market being jacked up artificially by immigration, or by immigrants coming in and boosting demand so that they have to build more high rise apartments everywhere to stuff all these pajeets into. And therefore Harry Triguboff’s company can come along and build those high rises with big government grants for billions and billions of dollars and sell them off a million dollars a pajeet box.

 

And then all the jews in the banks can then go issue even bigger and bigger mortgages to the goys and they can rub their hands together at the high interest rate.

 

So yeah, Harry Triguboff is scum and he’s one of the biggest contributors in political campaign financing as well. And he openly states, you know, his support for immigration and is massively supportive of like the pro-immigration lobby in general and has been for decades.

 

So yes, he doesn’t get enough hate to be honest. Like he’s this jewish billionaire who basically makes his fortune off the backs of the average Australian being screwed over by this perpetual housing bubble that he keeps paying off the government to exacerbate with more and more immigrants. And I feel like we should do more work to like focus some like collective hatred on this guy. Because every single Australian that’s struggling to find a house to rent right now, every single Australian that is getting absolutely raped in their mortgage repayments because their houses are wildly overpriced because of mass immigration fueling this perpetual housing bubble to the point of ridiculousness where in any major Australian city now, like, it’s almost impossible for anyone under the age of 35 to really get into the property market because of how exorbitant it is to buy even a shitty home in a shitty area. He’s one of the principal people that should be blamed. You know, his greed and his nefariousness and his lack of loyalty to this country is one of the main fundamental reasons, like why are we allowing a jew to be so fucking powerful in our country. So he needs more hate!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Nice. And the next Superchat is from Wabo 84. Sends through $50. Thanks very much, mate. And he says:

 

“You guys made the ABCS 7:30 report tonight. Keep up the good work.”

 

Not sure how we made that.

 

Thomas Sewell: Moira Redeeming.

 

Joel Davis: Well, it’s always good to be on the news.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. The next one’s from Jake. Jake1219, $10. Thanks very much, mate. He says:

 

“Question for Tom. Would you say you follow a Machiavellian type philosophy? I noticed a couple of streams ago you welcome the catalysts of discontent between White Australians and Palestinian protesters.”

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m actually nowhere near as unscrupulous as Cottrell, but, … Look, he’s embarrassed. [chuckling] I think that the concept raises an interesting dynamic between winning at all cost, being unscrupulous, and being the principled dead man. And so being an Aryan is walking a tightrope, in my opinion, between those two concepts. I wouldn’t call myself Machiavellian, although I’d say I’m a realist. I think politically his advice is based on realism. It’s like, well, this is what you have to do to win! And I think that’s the dialogue.

 

But it’s not my advice. It’s not me. I’m a Hitlerian. I’m not a Machiavellian. I’m a Hitlerian. But I am very interested in the dynamic.

 

And as I say, I think the dynamic is a tightrope between not becoming Machiavellian and not becoming the principled dead man. I believe there is a tightrope in between that a leader must walk. Because there’s a lot of good guys that are dead. Well, everyone dies, but there’s a lot of good guys that die early. There’s a lot of good guys that don’t make it all the way. There’s a lot of good guys that have great ideas and great spirit and great character, and they are surpassed by people that are unscrupulous.

 

So I think it’s important to learn the Machiavellian principles. I think it’s also important to learn how the jews operate and how they’ve been so successful. But it doesn’t mean to emulate them. It just means to be aware of them.

 

But, yeah, it’s a very interesting question. You said, “welcome the catalyst of discontent between White Australians and Palestinian protesters”. Well, I observe reality. I see what the system is doing. Maybe it’s a coping strategy. But I’m sick and tired of being frustrated. I’m just I’m fatigued. I’m frustration fatigued! I’m not frustrated at these things anymore. I’m not going to interrupt the enemy making a mistake. I think of these bad things happening to us are a good thing in the silver lining, in the sense, I mean, this is Hitlerian. This is not Machiavellian. This is Hitlerian. He says that all losses can be turned into a victory.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s funny. It’s a good answer. It’s a good answer.

 

It’s funny because I’ve had people throughout the years approach me and say:

 

“Oh I think, you know, Tom’s manipulative or Machiavellian.”

 

Or something like that, and I say:

 

“And you’re coming to me with this?”

 

[chuckling]

 

So anyway, next one is an interesting. Rimboard was Right. Who’s Rimboard? Rimboard was Right. Sends $2 and he says:

 

“Didn’t Europeans cuck to Christianity like the Muslims did?”

 

What do you reckon, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: It’s different because the Christians, this meme that the Christians are all forced to convert by the sword, it’s accurate in some parts of Europe, like in Scandinavia and so on. But it’s not actually universally accurate. Like, a lot of the conversions was like a genuine thing where people just genuinely adopted Christianity. It wasn’t like they were all forced to. It didn’t spread through warmongering, it spread through Evangelism to the majority of Europe.

 

[2:25:52]

 

Having said that, obviously there’s a lot of brutality in European history. I mean, particular sects of Christianity, like the Aryans, which is no relation necessarily to Aryan, as in the denomination of the race of Aryans. But the Aryans is in the followers of the theologian Arius. Arius taught, like, a non-trinitarian form of Christianity. A lot of the Gothic tribes, like, yeah, the Vandals and so on in the late period of the Roman Empire, followed that form of Christianity, which didn’t conform with the more orthodox form that we would know today as Catholicism. And they were pretty brutally, like, wiped out by Emperor Justinian.

 

And so it’s a complicated question, but I don’t think it’s exactly equivalent to Islam, because Islam really spread very specifically and directly through the sword with death penalties, basically, for not converting. They’ll come in, they’ll take over the territory militarily, then they’ll put a tax on you and oppress you until you convert. And then once you convert, you can’t then deconvert, otherwise you get executed.

 

So it’s a bit different. It’s kind of a more aggressively and systematically expansionist process.

 

Blair Cottrell: That subject leads us into this next Superchat, which is only little one, just a dollar from a bloke called, or someone called Phoenician Blood:

 

“As a Lebanese Christian, is it ironic of me to sympathize with your cause.”

 

I don’t know. Like, I have noticed that sort of personally, I’ve noticed when other races adopt Christianity, they tend to become more friendly to Whites for some reason. But I’ve never really had a good understanding of why that is because I haven’t thought enough about it to understand it. What do you think, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I think you’re noticing that because the alternative for all of these races is to usually to be Muslim. So you get, like, a black Muslim, or a black Christian or, like a Lebanese Muslim, or a Lebanese Christian.

 

And obviously Muslims are more kind of hostile to us because they’re hostile to us on religious grounds, in addition.

 

I think also in with the when it comes to the Lebanese the I think there is actually somewhat of a racial or ethnic difference between the Christians and the Muslims there in general. So that could also play into it.

 

But yeah, if you’re a Christian Lebo, who sympathizes with us. Well, no, I mean, of course you would sympathize with us because why wouldn’t you? Like, this is clearly our fucking country and we’re being systematically genocided by jews, which you would, as a Lebanese person, understand why the jews are a problem. Considering the relations between Lebanon and Israel over the years.

 

My response to that is quite simple. Like, if you’re really that sympathetic, then why the fuck are you here? Like, get the hell out of our country. Like, you’re not really. People say that:

 

“Oh I’m very sympathetic. And when you guys win you can send me back, I guess, like, if you have to.”

 

And it’s well, if you really, truly sympathize with us, you’d get out now. We wouldn’t have to send you back.

 

Like, there was this guy. I told this story before, but there was this dude who was friends with a group of my friends who are White nationalists. And he was Sri Lankan, and he hung up with a bunch of these White nationalist guys for a while. I think he met a bunch of them at church or something. And he became so sympathetic to White nationalism that he literally did deport himself back to Sri Lanka. And then he established an organisation to help Sri Lankans move back. And now he’s, like, helping other Sri Lankans deport themselves back to Sri Lanka.

 

To me, that’s someone who’s sympathetic. To me, that’s an ally. I respect that individual. Like, he actually had convictions and he realised:

 

“Well, wait a second, I’m fucking Sri Lankan. Why am I living in Australia? I’m gonna go live with my own people and focused on making my own people better rather than living as an outsider, weirdo parasite in the country I don’t really belong in with dignity.”

 

I don’t want to live in a non-White country around a bunch of non-Whites. I want to live with my own people and practice my own culture. I would feel like a weird alien element. Really uncomfortable, to be honest, in someone else’s country where I didn’t belong.

 

So it’s kind of undignified. It’s like, if you’re a Lebanese dude, why don’t you want to go and live in Lebanon with your own fucking people? I don’t really get it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, this will be the last Superchat, I think, because it’s getting to that time where it’s 11:11. It’s getting that time where I’m about to, I’ve got to consider going to bed because I’ve got work in the morning. My brain’s starting to shut off. I can’t see how much money this person sent, but it’s from Land of the Fake, Home of the Gay. [chuckling] He says:

 

“Thanks for being based, lads. These morning shows are awesome!”

 

You’re welcome, bro. I don’t know where you are for it to be a morning show, but certainly not here. It’s getting approaching midnight here, so I’m ready to go to bed if you guys are ready. What do you think?

 

[2:31:27]

 

Joel Davis: Oh, there’s one more Superchat quickly from Truth Seeker 66 Degrees, who said:

 

“Thoughts on the lack of political awareness of the average White Aussie due to not having to fight for our freedoms, like in the USA. Love the show, White power.”

 

I don’t really know what you mean here by saying, “you not having to fight for our freedoms”. I don’t really know what that exactly means.

 

Like, obviously probably talking about, …

 

Thomas Sewell: The difference between the American Revolution and Australian Federation in 1901 being a different process, but, …

 

Joel Davis: It is a different process. But that was still a fight. Like, White nationalism was a political fight in Australia and federating the country. A lot of the reason why, …

 

Thomas Sewell: It didn’t require us to go to war.

 

Joel Davis: The British Empire went along with federation was because they didn’t want a repeat of what happened in America and they were concerned. I mean, those battles like the Eureka Stockade and so on, where Australian rebels raised flag and fought the British. Yeah, by blood.

 

[Blair leaves the stream]

 

Thomas Sewell: Night, night.

 

Joel Davis: But White nationalism was the product of struggle in Australia. And it wasn’t as intensive as struggle because there was acquiescence from the authorities in Britain. And I think Australians being British, we were kind of quite happy to stay in the empire so long as we were given a certain amount of Democratic autonomy, which was actually granted, ultimately.

 

So I think if the Americans were given the deal that we were given, they probably wouldn’t have been an American Revolution.

 

But I don’t think that’s really why Australians are less politicised. I think it’s more to do with other cultural differences. I mean, one reason, actually, it was also that America is the most powerful country in the world. So, like, American politics kind of almost matters more because America has no kind of reference to an external, bigger country or something. Where a lot of people in Australia who are interested in politics, they’ll just consume American politics because it’s more interesting.

 

So you can have a conversation with Australians about American politics, and they kind of know what’s going on in America, sometimes almost, like, have more complex opinions about American politics than Australian politics, just because it’s a more interesting, like, media phenomenon to pay attention to. It’s more entertaining. Like, the characters are better. So that’s an aspect of it.

 

Additionally, I think because America has so many States and America’s got such an entrenched two party system, the kind of Republican versus Democrat thing is a lot more important there, and that kind of polarises the nation.

 

And also, Australia was pretty much a homogenous country until very recently. America has had the race issue, which was always a radically polarizing effect in American politics. And then immigration became a bigger problem quicker in America, where in Australia, we were, like, a 92% White country 15 years ago, 20 years ago. So, like, politics here was still the amicable dispute between middle class and working class Whites over tax policy and shit like that! Politics has only really become this kind of intense existential struggle that was highly racialised in a very short period of time. I don’t think our culture has really adapted to that.

 

Whereas in America, you’re voting for:

 

“What’s going to happen in the Cold War? Like, are we going to try and destroy communism? Who’s going to be in control of the nuclear weapons that could end the world? And, like fuck, there’s all these niggas, like, what are we going to do, like, what Mexicans pouring in!”

 

It’s like this big deal who’s in charge of America? Where in Australia, it really wasn’t a fucking big deal who was in charge. So I think that also contributes to it all.

 

But then also, I think you’d have to say American. The American founding stock were the Puritans. The Puritans coming over from Britain, who were kind of alienated by the politics at the time of the English Civil War and so on, where you have the Anglicans and the Catholics, and they wanted to kind of they were these ideological anti-Catholics, but also who didn’t want to acquiesce to the Church of England in many ways. And so there were, like, these political outsiders.

 

And so America was kind of founded by these kinds of political. This kind of political revolutionary spirit, and then they have their revolution and so on and so America’s always had this very intense intense earnestness, like, what they believe in, and they’re like, their principles in the world and so on are very definitive.

 

Whereas the Australian founding stock were a bunch of convicts, and the majority of us don’t descend from those convicts, but that almost like, has galvanised the country that, like the Australian people are kind of a little bit more rough. And it isn’t so much about ideological principles. Like, the struggle for Australian White nationalism was really just racism. It wasn’t like this big ideological battle about “our freedoms”. It was just kind of like:

 

“We don’t want fucking chinks here! This is the Whiteman’s fucking land. Get all these islanders out! Australia for the fucking Whiteman!”

 

That was really what Australia was always about. So Australia, in a certain sense, it didn’t have that highfalutin kind of ideological project.

 

And then like this civic education, when you go to school and you learn about the founding fathers and the freedoms that Thomas Jefferson wrote down in the Constitution and all this kind of shit! So Australians aren’t politicised for, I think, all of these reasons in the same way by the culture and the way that Americans are.

 

So I would say that would be my explanation. I know. Do you have any thoughts on that, Tom, wrap up the stream?

 

Thomas Sewell: No.

 

Joel Davis: You kind of you kind of over it?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. It’s too late to go into. What are the question? Thoughts on the lack of political awareness of the average White Aussie due to not having to fight?

 

Fucking Americans! Like holier than thou! That’s their primary issue. Like what? How many Australians have they met? And they’re just making these claims on the Internet, like:

 

“Oh, well, the average Australian is not as political as the average American. And, it’s really down to the Second Amendment and the American Revolution!”

 

It’s like, you don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about. [chuckling] I could go into detail, but, yeah, there’s fucking normie fags in every country. There’s politically mobile people in every country. I can almost guarantee across the Western world, it’s the same percentage. It’s the same percentage of dedicated political activists. It’s the same percentage of sympathetic political agitators. It’s the same percentage of traitors. It’s the same percentage of fucking normies that just want to watch the football.

 

Joel Davis: But also, when Americans go on about how:

 

“Oh, Australia, you don’t have your freedoms like we do!”

 

It’s like we literally had a White nationalist fucking paradise where we had all the fucking freedoms in the world.

 

And then the British Empire got destroyed, kind of by you guys in your unholy alliance with the Soviet Union to destroy Nazi Germany in World War Two. And then in an aftermath, to decolonise the world.

 

So then we had to kind of throw in our lot with you guys, fight the Japanese and do the whole anti-communist, Cold War thing with you guys, and we threw in our lots with you guys, and then you all got taken over by fucking jews! And became the most cut empire in world history that loves niggers and so on with a passion!

 

And then you imposed, like, fundamentally, you imposed that ideology upon all of your allies in Europe and here. And our political system got infected with the virus that consumed your political system, and that is ultimately what’s taking away our fucking freedoms!

 

And so if you guys used your fucking First and Second Amendment to actually take down the jews and assert White American sovereignty and not cuck to all these other races and actually hold on to America, then we’d still be White nationalists, too. We’d still have our guns and we’d be loving it! It would be great! I don’t know what we’d be up to.