Monika Schaefer: All right, greetings. Hello everyone. Good day. Good afternoon wherever you are. Today is November 16th, 2024. You are listening to the Republic Broadcasting Network at RepublicBroadcasting.org. This is episode 20 of The Flipside with Monika. I am your host, Monika Schaefer.

 

And today I am absolutely delighted to have a guest who is a very good friend of mine, Kathleen Dudley. She was born and raised not too far from where I grew up near Edmonton, Alberta, in a small town just north of there, but now is residing in the United States, in New Mexico, in fact, and has been, I think you became an American citizen quite a few years ago.

 

Before I bring Kathleen on, I’ll just remind the listener that this is listener supported. So if you possibly can support the Republic Broadcasting Network, go to the website@republicbroadcasting.org and you will find the donate button there. And there are different ways of donating, either directly or by supporting the sponsors.

 

And I always encourage people also to share these shows, tell other people about the Republic Broadcasting Network. There are many good shows on this network and you’re not going to hear this kind of stuff on the mainstream media or what some people call the “Mockingbird Media”. Okay.

 

And I will also tell people about the chat room. It’s at the flipside w.monica.chatango.com and you can share things there. And I share things there from time to time. And yeah. So I wanted to tell you about that.

 

Okay. So Kathleen, are you there? Can you hear me?

 

Kathleen Dudley: I can. And thank you very much, Monika. I’ve been looking forward to this and what a surprise and a privilege and a joy.

 

Monika Schaefer: Thank you. Well, I’ve been looking forward to this for quite some time. This has been sometime in the making, I think we could see. I’ll just tell the listener a little bit about how we first met. You interviewed me. You were producing some content. You had a YouTube channel and I think you still do, although probably a lot of the videos that were a little bit more in the forbidden territory. You have, I think, an Odysee channel or maybe you can tell us about that in a moment. But where you have most of your content. And you were interviewing me. That’s how we first met.

 

And then you ended up in your own big battle. It had nothing to do with World War II history, like my big court epic, you know, battles. [chuckling] But I found it quite amusing, to tell you the truth! It was rather amusing. That doesn’t matter what somebody’s trials and tribulations are about somehow there seems to always be a jew in the mix that brings in the Holocaust into it! [chuckling]

 

And the background to that is that I attended your trial, but it was virtual trial. Everybody was on Zoom and there were a bunch of people visible on the screen. And at some point, one of these people on the other side of things was pointing out to the judge:

 

“Oh, there’s somebody there on, in the witness in the room here, like on the Zoom screen. Do you know who that is?”

 

And I can’t remember exactly how they put it, but it was really quite comical, if you ask me, that somehow they managed to bring the Holocaust into it because they were pointing at me, my presence there and that I am, you know, quote, unquote, “a Holocaust denier”.

 

So this was supposed to smear you by association, which., … Well, there you go. Even though your trial had nothing to do with the Holocaust or World War II history, it was about other things.

 

But that’s not what we’re here to talk about today. Unless you wanted to share, you know, any background about that, Kathleen, because I know that in your process of going through the court system, you learned a lot! Do you want to talk touch on that at all?

 

Kathleen Dudley: Well, not unless it comes in indirectly in the rest of what we’re talking about. I think I’d rather stick to our plan, thank you.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, well, that’s the thing, our plan. Actually, Kathleen had approached me a few weeks ago and said:

 

“Well, I’m really looking forward to when you have a guest on that’s going to explain somebody who’s really an expert on fascism. Who can tell us what is fascism, what is that?”

 

And here we are today and it’s you and me talking about this subject of fascism because we, we’ve talked about this a little bit and you know, this term “fascist” is a term that is thrown around, bandied about willy nilly, constantly, all the time. And I would guess that 99% of the people who use that term just willy nilly to basically, if somebody’s bad:

 

“Oh, they’re a fascist!”

 

Or if some government or politician:

 

“Oh, that’s a fascist!”

 

You know. [chuckling] And I don’t think they have a clue what is fascism. So we both kind of dug into that a little bit, although I think you did more than I did.

 

So that’s what we want to unravel today a little bit. What is that? I mean, is fascism, does that deserve to be used as such a weaponized label that just means something really bad and what do people actually mean by it when they call somebody a fascist? I really think they have no clue. What do you think, Kathleen?

 

[07:19]

 

Kathleen Dudley: Well, I tend to agree with you. I think words are weaponized, as we know, and they’re the grimoire, the book of magic spells and incantations. And we’ve seen that you use the word “Trump”, and all of a sudden someone goes ballistic, or you use the word “Nazi” and someone goes ballistic.

 

But more than that, a picture, an image is created in their mind, and it evokes emotions and there’s no thought. It bypasses the reason. It bypasses the brain. It bypasses the capacity to be logical.

 

And that’s how words have been used. And they’ve been used that way for hundreds and hundreds of years. And fascism is one of those.

 

And so when I first talked with you about this, Monika, I said there’s two words, Nazi and fascist. And I said:

 

“Both of those need to be really torn apart and explained.”

 

And fascism has been on my radar. And between the two of us, I now have a sense that I understand “fascism”. And I’d like for other people to understand it so that they don’t get caught into that incantation, that spell, that grimoire of the word. Because how we use language expresses our clarity and our understanding of life. And if we aren’t clear with the use of our language, then we’re not clear in the direction in which we walk in life.

 

So to me, it’s critical. What’s your thought on that?

 

Monika Schaefer: Absolutely! Before I got a little bit of a deeper understanding of what is fascism, Because I’m still certainly no expert on it, but I do know a little bit more now than I did even just a short while ago. I still had the feeling, though, that people were using it wrongly and that it was just another one of these demonized words like Nazi. A demonized, you know, weaponized word. What does it actually mean?

 

And so I would say to people, when they use that word, or even people who are in our community of truth tellers and people who seem to know that were being lied to about this and that, but they would still use that word. So to those people, I would say:

 

“Look, I think that that word has been wrongly vilified and used, even though I myself did not yet know really what it was, but I still had the sense that they shouldn’t be just calling somebody a fascist if in the sense that, oh, that’s bad. You know, they’re bad.”

 

And so, yeah, it, we do need to stop people in their tracks when they’re using it, when we know that they should know better.

 

So that’s our mission today, to bring that out a little bit. Why don’t you talk a little bit about. Oh, well, in our, in our discussions we were talking about Ernst Zundel and then who was Ernst Zundel’s mentor? Adrian Arcand. And that’s the man who really helped Ernst Zundel wake up! And in his own words, he felt “born again”, born again to the truth! Adrian Arcand, he is a Canadian, was a Canadian man. He’s no longer alive. That was a while back. And he did, I think it was like a 10 minute talk that we both really liked because he explains fascism. Do you want to tell us a little bit about that?

 

Kathleen Dudley: Sure. Adrian Arcand was born in 1899 and he died in 1967. He was a politician and a writer and a journalist.

 

And the interesting thing is, of course, when you look at the jew Wikipedia, you know, he was a “fascist” politician. You know, it’s like name calling. It’s juvenile use of words, because it’s not meant in a descriptive way, it’s meant in a demonizing way.

 

 

So when he was interviewed, and I love this interview because it made it very, very clear.

 

And if you do a deep dive and you go on Wikipedia and you go on to the online dictionaries, the story of what fascism is so convoluted. What he says is:

 

“Fascism means nationalizing.”

 

He said it is:

 

“It’s the control of a nation by its nationals.”

 

And then you go:

 

“Oh, what’s a national?”

 

“So it’s having or expressing strong identification with one’s own nation and vigorous support for its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations.”

 

So, for example, as a German born woman, while you’re a Canadian born, but you’re of German ancestry, you might have very strong nationalistic identification for Germany and its culture as it was. Would that be correct?

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes. Basically fascism is nationalism.

 

And it’s important to distinguish the word nationalism from patriotism, because nationalism means nationhood. And nationhood means your ethnic racial group. This is what you are loyal to this is who you want your country to be, geared towards the benefit of your people, basically.

 

And so now that really would explain why in our mainstream, you know, weaponized lingo that’s been foisted upon us, that word has been turned into a weaponized label that is just so demonized! Because, I mean, who is it that owns the banks and owns the media? It is jewish. You know, it’s organized jewry. It’s jews who don’t like fascism precisely because it is basically an opposite of their agenda. It’s people working in their nations for their nation. And if your leaders are fascist, that’s a good thing. They are working for our interests in our nation and our nationhood. Back to you, Kathleen.

 

[14:26]

 

Kathleen Dudley: Okay.

 

And so what’s most interesting, too, if we look at what is happening today, to identify as a White woman, to identify with my ancestral origins, is considered very negative. That I could be considered a criminal in one way or another. It’s leading in those directions.

 

[See: What World-Famous Men Said About the Jews]

 

Now, one of the things that Adrian Arcand said was that the First World War was a revolt against the high culture and civilization of Germany. And it was to implant communism in Russia. And so that was what the First World War was about. And it was the most strategic place in the world because it was touching Europe, the Near East and Asia.

 

And then the Second World War, it widened the scope of communism, it spread it, and it smashed down the empires of the Western world. Now high culture is what has been targeted by the Bolsheviks, the jews, both in Russia in the Bolshevik Revolution and World War I and World War II in Germany. And we see today the Christian ethics being absolutely trounced upon.

 

So one of the things that Adrian Arkan looked at was what was happening right at the time he was in Canada and doing his work as a journalist. Rene Levesque was powerful at that point in time as well. And I remember, as you mentioned, I grew up in Canada. I remember his party. He was hard Left. And he described that he himself was far-Right. And he said, and this is defining fascism in a broader sense. And he’s saying:

 

“The Right affirms the sum total of tradition, which is made of high culture. And high culture consists of music and the arts and literature and science and mathematics. And it’s about revering these cultural classics.”

 

And he said:

 

“It’s also about the existence of God, the existence of a human soul and the dignity of man and freedom, private property and the sacred rights of family, also of free enterprise, the free activity of free men and free markets.”

 

On the opposite spectrum of socialism, where Rene Levesque was postulating and socialism was defined by the Soviets, it denies God, it denies the human soul, it denies freedom, the dignity of man, it denies the sacred rights of family. It denies free enterprise. It denies private property and private initiative.

 

So if you take a look at everything on the Left having to do with socialism, which in essence was the precursor to communism, which is Marxism, it’s all negative. And there was no substitution, there was no alternative.

 

Whereas on the Right, it’s about family, it’s about high culture, it’s about valuing individuality.

 

And so all we have to do is take a look at, here’s this man who’s been claimed and called a fascist, and he acknowledges that he is, but his values are the values that are of very high morals and ethics. And I would be proud to walk beside and be a part of his legacy, which I feel like I am. And I’m proud to know that fascism, in fact, is a very positive and important word that embodies Christian ethics.

 

So if you take a look at who’s throwing the daggers at the fascists, it’s the communists! It’s the Marxists! They’re the ones.

 

And as I was doing my reading and looking at definitions and articles on fascism, the editors or the authors of those articles were, in one case, a Sephardic jew. And who is building Wikipedia on our computers?

 

So here we have a very clear explanation, in my opinion, of the difference between fascism and communism.

 

Monika Schaefer: Basically, they’re polar opposites. So fascism, …

 

Kathleen Dudley: Exactly!

 

Monika Schaefer: It just sounds to me like fascism is the opposite of communism! And when you say you would be honored to walk beside this man, you’re talking about Adrian Arcand, are you?

 

Kathleen Dudley: Yes!

 

Monika Schaefer: And let me just mention that Adrian Arcand spent six years in a concentration camp.

 

Now, when I heard that, I thought:

 

“Oh, I just assumed in Europe.”

 

Like, somehow I didn’t know why. I didn’t know that much about him. I didn’t know why in Europe, but I just thought, well, that’s where these concentration camps were that we all have heard about so much. But, no, he was in a concentration camp in Canada for six years during the war.

 

Now, the war didn’t last six years, so did he go into the concentration camp? Was he pulled in? You know, was he arrested and thrown in there before the war?

 

Kathleen Dudley: Yes.

 

Monika Schaefer: Or did they just keep him? Is that correct?

 

Kathleen Dudley: I think it was 1940.

 

Monika Schaefer: Oh. So after the war began. But then they held him in there for six years in a Canadian concentration camp. That blew my mind! I didn’t even know that that existed. Although we’ve all heard about the camps for the Japanese and that. But here was this French-Canadian guy from Quebec, right?

 

So, yeah, but he was a fascist, which is the polar opposite of communism, and communism is what the Bolsheviks were. And we know that that was overwhelmingly a jewish operation. And even the jews say it themselves basically that:

 

“Judaism is communism and communism is Judaism.”

 

So that’s one and the same thing. So we could just call it what it is.

 

Kathleen Dudley: Right. And so here we do have this name calling, and yet it is actually a compliment if you believe in God, if you believe in the sacredness of family, if you believe in individuality, if you believe in free market enterprise, if you believe in the right to own property.

 

So why would someone be hurling the word “fascist” against someone with spit and venom, when in fact it’s really an accolade? It’s such a positive characteristic!

 

And if you look too this has been going on for so long, and fascism originated from my reading in Italy. And Ezra Pound, who most people will know and will be very familiar with his Cantos and his famous poem on usury, Usura. He was an American poet and he had many protege. He had T.S. Eliot and Ernest Hemingway. And my mind goes blank on the others, but there were four Pulitzer Prize winners, and he was never awarded that Pulitzer Prize himself.

 

But he went to Italy, and during the wars, he was doing broadcasting, exposing the communist spread that was taking place in the Soviet Union as a result of the Bolshevik Revolution that hit in October 1917. And after the war, he was imprisoned by the US military and was kept in an iron cage. And then he was declared insane and put in St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Washington, D.C. Where he wrote his most famous work, the Cantos. And finally he was released through the help of his friends. One was Ernest Hemingway. But we see how demonized, how threatening words are.

 

And so if you can take a word and twist it, turn it upside down, flip it, the flipside, right? And if people don’t do the deep dive and really look at, well, what does that word mean, then they become under the spell, that grimoire.

 

And so it’s our responsibility to pull apart everything that is being used against us so that we can shine light on it and walk proudly, knowing that with fascist beliefs, we are honorable people with integrity.

 

[25:08]

 

Monika Schaefer: Well said, Kathleen. That is so well said!

 

In fact, from now on, when somebody throws that word around, going to say:

 

“Thank you, I’m a fascist. That’s a wonderful thing to be!”

 

And then if it’s people who are throwing that word around unknowingly or ignorant of the meaning of it. Because like I said earlier, even people who understand the truth about the “Covidocaust” or about the “Holocaust”, they understand they’re kind of most of the way there in terms of waking up to many of the lies around us.

 

I mean, I suppose we’re always learning more and more, but they will still bandy about that word. And to them, that would be very effective, especially to them, because it will stop them in their tracks:

 

“Say what? What do you mean?”

 

And then it gives us the opportunity to explain this word in the shortest form, you say:

 

“Well, it’s the opposite of communism.”

 

And then we can expand on that and wow, that was a wonderful explanation. Yeah, really good!

 

And I just want to say before the bottom of the hour, and I should have done this at the top of the hour when we began, but I really was just coming off of the previous hour with Frederick C. Blackburn on his Saturday Snack Shack.

 

And I encourage listeners, if you don’t already tune into his show, you really should because it’s just such a great show and you can always find it in the archives.

 

So I was a little bit, not completely my brain was still sort of wired on that. But I just wanted to say, Kathleen, a little bit of background on my friend Kathleen. She’s a poet, a singer, a healer, musician with, I think, several instruments, a writer. And you have many talents and skills that I think you should name a few more because I think I only just touched on those things. But the healing really intrigues me. You have a lot of knowledge on healing ourselves, and that is a very, very wonderful and important skill to have. And maybe you can share with people where they can find you if they are seeking healing help, for instance, because I know that you do this as your work.

 

Kathleen Dudley: Well, thank you, Monika. Yes, I’m a reflexologist. I’ve also studied homeopathy and a lot of herbs and nutrition. And I have a website, it’s katdudley, KATDUDLEY dot com, and you can find me there.

 

And I’m also a builder of steps and, …

 

Monika Schaefer: Construction, we’re talking about?

 

Kathleen Dudley: Yes. And carports. And I love to build as well, so I have a strong intellectual draw, but I love the physical as well. I’m spreading large rock at the moment and rebuilding rock walls, so it helps keep me spry. [chuckling]

 

Monika Schaefer: That’s wonderful! [chuckling] Yeah. It actually just was so much fun for me to see the things you are building. And I’m thinking:

 

“Wow, that’s really very nice that you just take this on, you learn how to do it and you obviously must have acquired a few tools and just go at it!”

 

That’s great!

 

Kathleen Dudley: Thank you. Before we go to the break, I wanted to mention one thing that Adrian Arcand said in his, in that interview. He said:

 

“He said there is no anti-semitism. It never existed! He said it is a natural reaction against an assault of anti-gentilism which is non-jewish.”

 

He said:

 

“It’s a jewish conspiracy because I read it from jewish authors!”

 

Monika Schaefer: That’s great! [chuckling] That’s beautiful, Kathleen. Okay, hold on everybody. And we’ll be back in a few minutes.

 

[29:34]

 

[ad]

 

[36:00]

 

[music]

 

[36:58]

 

Monika Schaefer: All right, I’d like to welcome you all back to The Flipside with Monika. And I would like to first of all, give out the numbers. We invite people to call in the second half of the hour.

 

So the number you can call in is 512-248-8252. That’s 512-248-8252 or 1-800-313-9443. We invite you to join our conversation with Kathleen Dudley and myself. And I’d also like to remind you that if you have the means, if you can possibly support this network because it is listener supported and some older equipment, I know that they’re looking to replace some of their older equipment.

 

But anyway, during the break, Kathleen and I were kind of laughing about the fact that she had asked me to have a guest that would explain these words, “fascism” and some of these other words.

 

And I said to her, well, careful what you wish for, [chuckling] because here she is and she’s doing a marvelous job of explaining the fascism and fascist, the whole concept of that.

 

So, okay, Kathleen, why don’t we carry on with that discussion? And we had mentioned that there are some other words as well that we could go into that perhaps people don’t have really the best understanding of well, one word that came to mind right at the beginning that you mentioned already was “Nazi” and we know there’s a history of that. It was actually a jew who put that word into the lexicon to denigrate the National Socialists. Do you want to talk about that a little bit?

 

[39:02]

 

Kathleen Dudley: Well, I haven’t done the deep dive on that.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay.

 

Kathleen Dudley: But one of the things that I found very interesting from Adrian Arcand was that he said that the term “fascism”, when it arose in the 1920s in Italy, the word “Nazism” arose in Germany, but that that had to do with Nazi-lism Nazi-nationalism, and that it was really about nationalistic perspectives expressing strong identification with one’s own nation and vigorous support for its interest. So I was quite surprised by that.

 

And then also in Spain, there was another term using their Spanish language, which I don’t recall. So that’s really all I can contribute at this moment.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay. No, but that’s even just that about the Nazi-lism with the “l” in there. So nationalism. And that is that word that the Bolsheviks, the jews, they don’t like that concept of nationalism. And that would be like fascism. That would be so that’s why those words are so demonized! And anybody that does anything bad these days is called a Nazi, or a fascist. That’s why those terms are so demonized!

 

But you know that this is something that I am very, very interested in and have talked quite a lot about. My brother Alfred talks about it a lot, is our language and how our language has been so turned against us to compartmentalize our brains, to stop us from thinking straight, to frighten people, to make people think:

 

“Oh, we can’t talk about that. And we can’t talk about this!”

 

And make people scared to say anything anymore. And that’s all it is, really.

 

And so if we can take these words, first of all, to clarify in our heads that they are just weaponized words, and in most cases, they actually have been turned upside down to mean the opposite. Like you illustrated so well with the word fascist.

 

And then, you know, run with it. When somebody calls you something bad like this, say:

 

“Thank you. Thank you for noticing!”

 

It’s surprising how quickly it takes the wind out of their sails. You know, if somebody says:

 

“Oh, you’re an anti-semite!”

 

“Oh, thank you. Thank you for noticing. Yeah, you should be too!”

 

Something like that. [chuckling] Right? So it’s what we do with these epithets thrown at us that we can kind of change the discourse. What do you think about that?

 

Kathleen Dudley: Well, and people don’t even know that Semites are Arabs.

 

And so when you say you’re anti-semitic, you’re against the Arabs, well, that doesn’t even make sense because we’re talking about the jews and we’re talking about the Sephardic jews, and we’re talking about the Khazarian jews. We’re talking about. We’re not even talking about the biblical jews because the Hebrews, the descendants of that is so minuscule today.

 

And so the jews that have evolved to today have moved into countries, have moved into religions, have moved into businesses. They’ve basically taken on the sheep’s clothing that the wolf is wearing. And it’s been done slyly, very cleverly. And so everything has been done with duplicity. And that’s what we’re finding as we unbury the garbled of these words, the grimoire, the confusion.

 

And so once we find the truth in all of that, then we can shine the light on it. And that is what the rats in the center of the room don’t want. They’ll scurry to the edges.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, they will.

 

Now, Kathleen, there is something else that you have been doing over the last few months. I think you’ve been doing a lot of reading, and once you started, you just couldn’t get enough. Why don’t you tell us a little bit. What got you started in this direction? I won’t mention. I’ll let you talk about what have you been getting into so deeply reading, reading, reading lately? Tell us, please.

 

Kathleen Dudley: Okay. Well, I’ve always been a reader, but in January of 2023, I did a deep dive on 19th century and, 20th century writers, which introduced me to Ezra Pound and all of his contemporaries, T.S. Eliot, Robert Frost. And then there were quotes by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn in that. And I was in the courts at that time.

 

 

And so there was tremendous angst and tremendous pressure and assault. And I needed a place to be able to go for truth and for some sense of a spiritual lift. And I was talking to a friend and he had been reading The Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn.

 

And I thought:

 

“Okay, it’s time for me to read him.”

 

I remember when he was exiled from the Soviet Union, and it’s time, it’s just time. And there are three volumes of the Gulag Archipelago, and I started diving into them.

 

Now, at that time, I was being threatened with imprisonment. And so I was trying to figure out how this arrest was going to go. And curiously, the first chapter in the first volume of The Gulag Archipelago is called The Arrest. And it was as many a hundred different ways to skin a cat. You know, they came at night. It was always secretively done. Innocent people were taken and they were shipped off to Gulags, they were shipped off to prisons in Siberia. They were separated from family, and the rest of the citizens didn’t know or at various times, and they were threatened and they kept silent. And this went on and on. It went on as a result of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917. And now Solzhenitsyn was born in 1918, so it was even a year after the revolution. But he was raised in this communist milieu.

 

[46:29]

 

Now, his mother was of the Christian Orthodox faith, and his father had been killed when he was in the army. And so he was raised by his mother, and his mother wanted to raise him with Christian values. So he was taught the Russian Orthodox Christianity.

 

But he became a communist because that was just the way he was programed, along with all of his peers. And he was a writer just by nature, and wanted to be a writer. He knew he wanted to be a writer from the time he was about was very young, but I think about seven years old. He was in the army and he was corresponding with one of his compatriots, and his letter was intercepted and he was thrown into the Gulag under Stalin for speaking against Stalin’s concepts. And he was there for eight years, and then later he was exiled for three years.

 

And what he did during that time was he observed and he wrote. He was a real man of spiritual life, and he loved humanity, he loved the people, and he loved the Russian people.

 

And so he managed to develop his memory to such a degree that he memorized everything he wrote, and he memorized everything that other people told him, including writers, verbatim. He could quote them. And he had to store all this in his mind. And he did that whole time, the eight years that he was imprisoned.

 

And he was one of the very first to expose all of the atrocities of the Soviet Union’s repressive system and that they had been secretly perpetrating against their people. It was upwards of 100 million Christian Russians were murdered under Lenin and Stalin and even Khrushchev, even though that was considered the thaw. But he was then also removed because he was lessening his rule too much.

 

So Solzhenitsyn wrote these amazing books, his first one that they allowed to be published, because under Communist rule, under these repressive rulings, the censorship doesn’t want anything to move out into another country so that anyone can know what the atrocities are, what is going on. But because Khrushchev did this thaw, he allowed the book called One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich in 1962. And it was the first time a household could sit around the table and read about what had been going on to their people and how they’d been sent to the prisons and how they’ve been tortured and how they’ve been murdered, had they been pulled out of society and destroyed.

 

And this was it was allowed because Khrushchev thought that this was something that Solzhenitsyn was writing about, about Stalin and Lenin and didn’t realize that it also was being written about him. And it was also under Khrushchev that he was exonerated for his crimes, that he didn’t commit any crimes, but he was still exonerated.

 

 

And then he was writing the book called The Gulag Archipelago. And that book was a real deep dive. It’s the one that I read the three volumes of all of the tortures and all of the horrors of the Russian people.

 

And he had to pass it around on pieces of paper and on transcripts because he was constantly being followed. And it couldn’t get into the authorities hands or he would have been killed. But it did slip into the authorities hands through the secretary. And she was tortured and she ultimately committed suicide because she felt so responsible for the fact that she was the one that allowed the authorities to get this document.

 

And so he managed to get it out of the Soviet Union to the West. And it was published, and that was in 1973. And as a result of that publication, he was exiled from the Soviet Union.

 

And ultimately he moved to the United States in 1976, where he wrote the Red Wheel, which was the Russian Revolution of 1917 and dramatized. But this man is one of the most famous and most important Russian writers of modern time. And just his courage to be able to take the words and to honor the lives of all these people who were destroyed in the Gulags and under Stalin’s bloodbath.

 

And finally, when the Soviet Union collapsed, his wife and he regained their citizenship and in 1990, went back to Moscow, and he lived to quite an old age of 89. His wife is still alive. They have three sons. One of them, Ignat Solzhenitsyn, is a musician and a conductor who lives in the United States.

 

The other two are in the Soviet Union. But he’s known very famously for his Harvard speech. And I would highly recommend everyone going on YouTube and listening to it, because he’s warning about the dangers of the communist aggression and the weakening of the moral fiber of the West. And he says the materialism is really what has destroyed us in the West.

 

And I think if we do some reflecting, we can see how that is possible. And it is astonishing! He lived a tremendous life, and I am so grateful to him.

 

Monika Schaefer: That’s for sure. You know, interestingly enough, my brother Alfred, he was able to get these books from the prison library, The Gulag Archipelago, and he read them in prison. I was quite surprised by that they were available for him to read there. Wow! That’s such an interesting story. But I’m so surprised that when he had these books published, he was exiled for it. I’m kind of surprised they didn’t just, … Well, I suppose it would have put more attention on the books if they had just killed him. Right. Maybe they didn’t want to do that, but they didn’t want to, …

 

 

[54:13]

 

Kathleen Dudley: He was certainly concerned that his family and he were going to be killed. So the fact that they didn’t kill him and they exiled him is probably correct, that it would have brought too much attention because the books had already been published.

 

Monika Schaefer: Right. He would have been a Martyr. It would have Martyred him, and then even more people would have read the books.

 

Kathleen Dudley: Yes. Yes!

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. This way they just kind of put him out of the way and hope that it just nobody is much interested in them. I do have the books, and I haven’t read them yet, but you are causing me to want to read them soon. This is always my trouble. I have so many books that I want to read and to find enough time to do so.

 

But now he also wrote a book, Two Hundred Years Together. Do you know anything about that? Has it been translated into English yet?

 

Kathleen Dudley: Actually, I just received it in the mail today. And it’s the history, quote, “of the jewish problem in Russia”. And he is writing about what happened prior to the Revolution, the October 1917 Revolution, and what it was like living in Russia with the jews. Because under the czars, you know, up until Nicholas the First, they were excluded from society, and they were very limited. And when Nicholas the First allowed them in, what ended up happening is they grew. They created their capacity to build their Bolshevik Revolution, and they brought all their revolutionaries in from all over the world.

 

Monika Schaefer: Oh, okay. Thank you know, Kathleen, we do actually have a caller on the line now. So and we only have less than two minutes left, so I would like to invite Mike in Kentucky on line one. Are you there?

 

Mike: Yeah, I should have called earlier, but stop me if you’ve heard this one:

 

“We cannot Reform the Bolsheviks, but we can do our best to save them and ourselves from the consequences of their act.”

 

And that is the opening letter from E. Hewitt, Assistant Secretary, I think it’s the Ministry of Information:

 

“The Ministry can enter into no correspondence of any kind with regard to this communication, which should only be disclosed to responsible persons.”

 

And it’s a letter to the clergy asking them for their expression of belief into the allegations against Japan and Germany in order to distract the public’s attention from the doings of the Red Army. 1944. That’s in a book published in 1959 by Edward J. Rosnick called Allied Wartime Diplomacy.

 

I was going to bring that up on Blackbird9’s thing about how they killed the Russians, I mean, the general who wanted to go after Russia, Patton.

 

Monika Schaefer: Oh, thank you. Yeah, we just have a few seconds. Do you want to comment on any of that, Kathleen? That’s very interesting.

 

Kathleen Dudley: Well, I think I’ll leave that for you, Monika.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, just wait. Well, I can already hear the music, but, Mike, I really appreciate that you called in and yeah, too bad you didn’t call earlier. It sounds very interesting, what you have there, the good information. Thank you, everybody for listening and thank you, Kathleen, for giving us a great talk about fascism. And thank you, Frank, that’s the producer. And thank you most of all the listeners. Bye bye.

 

Kathleen Dudley: Thank you.

 

 

[58:28]

 

[music]

 

[58:48]

 

[ad]

 

[1:00:00]

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

RBN Comments

top

(Comments as of 11/17/2024 = 0)

Let me tell You a sad story ! There are no comments yet, but You can be first one to comment this article.

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 1 – Intro – Jun 29, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 2 – Jul 6, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 03 with Paul Fromm – Jul 13, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 04 with Oscar – Jul 20, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 08 with Alfred Schaefer – Aug 17, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 09 with Grace Eki Oyama – Aug 24, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 15 with Jürgen Neumann on Ernst Zündel – Oct 12, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 18 with Jürgen Neumann – Nov 2, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 20 with Kathleen Dudley – Nov 16, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 9/2/2024 = 5)

@kouldbanyone4983
1 year ago
Excellent speech!

British Australian Community
·
1 reply

@leonhanford5560
1 year ago
The next few years ahead will be interesting.The speaker is right we need to start playing identity politics and group together.
3

British Australian Community
·
1 reply

@britishaustraliancommunity
10 months ago
Thank you for the feedback Leon.

@marsrockfromspace5750
8 months ago
IQ differences between race has been explained and its not to do with race an easy way to see this is by looking at maps of IQ around the world and seeing that places with the same race dont have the same scores.

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Damienrichardson.online Show 36 – Frank Salter – Oct 18, 2023 – Transcript

 

 

 

Damien Richardson: Welcome back to Damienrichardson.online where we are continuing, definitely today we’re continuing to have the difficult conversations. We’re talking to retired academic Frank Salter. Once we hear the title of the book that he’s recently published with a colleague of his, Harry Richardson. I think we might wonder whether he actually retired if he was thrown out of academia because the name of the book is Anglophobia, the Unrecognized Hatred.

 

Frank Salter, welcome to the show.

 

Frank Salter: Nice, nice to be here.

 

Damien Richardson: Now, Frank, what prepossessed you to even be to begin to write a book with that title?

 

Frank Salter: Well, what began it was I received a 6,000 word email, in effect from my co-author Harry Richardson. And he said:

 

“I’ve got an idea for an article.”

 

We thought it would be maybe about that long, 6,000 words. It went to almost ten times that.

 

And he had this argument, which is the structure of the book, which is talking about everyone else can have their home country but not us. Anglo Australians and all other European nations are not permitted to have their own country where they remain the super majority. Not just a 51% majority, but an 85, a 90% majority, which most other peoples aspire to. They might not have it, but they aspire to it. They can lobby for it, they can agitate for it and they’re not called Nazis. Right?

 

So territory is homeland is a basic one, or control of immigration and so on and so forth.

 

And I thought this is rhetorically really powerful.

 

So between us, his concept of the book became a book project, took us a year. And with my academic training together, it was a great combination. And we came up with this book that I think covers a lot of the sensitive areas.

 

Damien Richardson: The book was only recently published, wasn’t it?

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, earlier this year [2023]

 

Damien Richardson: Earlier this year. How’s it been received in academic circles and also by the broader public?

 

Frank Salter: Not one review! It’s just been ignored, except on the dissident side of politics. It’s dissident Right. It’s been acknowledged, been reviewed. It was published initially in Quadrant magazine, which is Australia’s premiere intellectual magazine for conservatives. Quadrant magazine’s been running for 50, 60 years.

 

So it was published in a huge, you know, series, four long articles with other part of the book.

 

So that was good. And we had good responses from readers there.

 

But in academe, no, I think I can’t think of one review.

 

Damien Richardson: So why is it being ignored? Talk us through that process. Why would it be ignored? You have fine credentials, you worked overseas, as part of academia as well as in Australia, as well as your colleague, so why would it be ignored?

 

Frank Salter: Well, for the same reason that I could not find a job in Australia! I had to work overseas at a research Institute in Europe for 20 years. I couldn’t find work in Australia. Why? Because my field of study, it’s not Right-wing or anything, but I study human nature and how that underpins political systems.

 

So I’m a political scientist trained at Sydney University, PhD, Griffith University in Brisbane. My doctoral dissertation was published by Oxford University Press. You can’t do better than that. And my supervisor, [chuckling] my Professor said:

 

“You’ve got it. You’re home and hosed, Frank. You’re home and hosed! This is it!”

 

I mean, if Oxford publishes your PhD dissertation, you can just sort of name your position. It’s great!

 

No chance! I had just no chance. And for that same reason, the book is just ignored. Books on the Right are just ignored.

 

Damien Richardson: So it proves your thesis in many respects, doesn’t it?

 

Frank Salter: It does. It does!

 

Damien Richardson: And what is your thesis?

 

Frank Salter: That there’s been a Cultural Revolution which became manifest, it started earlier, but it became manifest in the 1960s with the student rebellions across the West. And then went through the 1970s. It’s called the Counterculture. I mean, it was pretty easy to notice. And it was called a Cultural Revolution, but it went much deeper.

 

And what it reflected was a change in cultural elites right through the West’s history and the history of other countries. Their intellectual elites have reflected, have belonged to the people, they’ve been part of the people, they’ve come from the people often, and they haven’t critiqued or sought to tear down the basic society, the structure of society and so on.

 

They’ve actually been loyal to it, although critical here and there, of course, being intellectuals got to be critical of something, I suppose. But they wouldn’t want to tear down the whole structure. That changed.

 

Now there’s a literature on this. Eric Kaufman, for example, his 2004 book, The Rise and Fall of Anglo America. Eric Kaufman, still alive, valuable colleague, Harvard University Press. This is mainstream academy.

 

And he pointed out that by the 1950s, the cosmopolitan Left had captured elite American universities. The American university system at the top, not the bottom of it. There is like two or 3,000 American universities, most of them low powered two year colleges. But the elite ones, Princeton, Harvard and the big state systems, those universities were in effect captured by the late 1950s.

 

Ten years later, you have the student uprising, hating America, hating its history, hating their ancestors! Which really peaked in the 1970s. And people look back and they think:

 

“Oh, yeah, that’s interesting. But it’s gone now.”

 

No, it’s not gone! The rebels are now Professors! The rebels became the Professors. The rebels change the curriculum so that our school system now in Australia, this trickled down to Australia, because all these academic disciplines are global.

 

So you have the Society for Political Science, for example, has international connections. They’re all linked.

 

[07:15]

 

Damien Richardson: As a result of our connection to the US Empire, because we’re part of that empire, a suzerain, I would say of the American empire, and as a result, that Civil Rights Movement that you talk about, that really took hold in the sixties, then we got it, by Corollary, to just to maintain, to be part of that empire. Is that right?

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, I think there is a connection, but it’s deeper than that there are civilizational connections. So Australia was traditionally connected with Britain, and Britain had the peak academic bodies, and then Australian universities would hire them.

 

Now, as we matured, we trained up our own academics. Fine. But any serious scientific or academic discipline will be global, will be international, because it doesn’t matter who comes up with an idea. It can be black skinned, White skin, could be Asian, could be whatever. If it’s truth, it’s truth! If it’s science, it’s science! So these disciplines are fundamentally international in their outlook.

 

And so when you have dominant metropolitan powers, such as Britain during its Empire days or America during its empire days, it has tremendous ability to capture that, to influence the overall flavor of disciplines and also of culture.

 

So America also was a major, the global major exporter of popular culture, Hollywood, musical culture, and so on.

 

And part of that, Britain became part of that power structure. So these ideas flowed down. So Australian, for example, Australian immigration policy has roughly remained in sync with American immigration policy.

 

So America opened its doors to third world immigration in 1965, a piece of legislation which dismantled what they had in place, which basically forged, made America what it was, which is an extension of European civilization. 1965, that was dismantled. In Australia, it was 1969.

 

So there’s been a rough correspondence.

 

Why? Because these trends are international. And it’s not just because of who is currently in power in America. It’s deeper than that it’s more Deep State. It’s more Deep State, or establishment power involved.

 

Damien Richardson: Yeah, because it’s not party political then, is it at all? Because the 69 would have been a Liberal prime minister in Australia.

 

Frank Salter: Exactly!

 

Damien Richardson: [Harold] Holt. Yes, to brought about this cultural change.

 

Frank Salter: Exactly! So it began mildly, and then it became more and more radical, and you had Whitlam. And already Whitlam’s 72 to 75 were his years. Already he introduced political multiculturalism as the official ideology, which from then on, more and more governed immigration policy and also domestic ethnic policy.

 

Who’s on top? What is the ethnic hierarchy? Well, it wasn’t us on top anymore, I can tell you! [chuckling] It flipped the hierarchy to be minority centric!

 

Damien Richardson: So the White Anglo Saxon Protestant was on top previous to this cultural shift. You’re saying that occurred post Second World War?

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, and this was the case from the beginning. The Australian immigration policy made Australia. It forged what we are, our basic identity, which is at its heart, its Anglo, but in the broader sense of being Western civilization and so on.

 

So it encompasses Irish, encompasses Scottish, and goes beyond the British Isles to people from a broad European background.

 

Now, we had a shock to the system in the mid-19th century during the gold rushes, when there was, for a time, unrestricted Chinese immigration. And the Chinese being what they are, hardworking, studious, and they went overseas. There was a gold rush. Why wouldn’t they? But it didn’t work out culturally. It was a disaster, actually, culturally! And that really shocked the six colonies because several of them had their own gold rushes at different times. It was a shock!

 

And so when the Federation movement began in the 1890s and then culminated in 1901 with the Commonwealth being created, the first piece of legislation, the first was the Restrictive Immigration Act. That was the first, the most important thing that they had on the table. And they said:

 

“Well, obviously, we must have, …”

 

The point wasn’t, as the Left would say:

 

“Oh, it’s Anglo supremacism!”

 

The point was assimilation. That was the point! The point was to bring people in who would readily assimilate.

 

And in the great speeches leading up to Federation and immediately after Federation, they pointed at the United States as a negative example of where not to go if you want to have a cohesive country. They pointed to the civil war. They pointed to slavery, the terrible conflict over freeing the black slaves. And this terrible conflict, which killed 600,000 Americans, it was. Tore America apart during the civil war in the 1860s. And they said:

 

“We don’t want that!”

 

So they were determined. So Australian immigration policy can be taken back, actually taken back, right to Arthur Phillips, the first governor, or Hunter immediately after him. When it was put to him:

 

“Listen, we need more women. Let’s bring in some women from the Pacific islands, from the South Pacific. We can find lots of women there!”

 

And [chuckling] he said:

 

“No, I think we’ll do it ourselves. I think we can bring women.”

 

If he’d made a different decision, our history would be different. We’d now be a different people.

 

Damien Richardson: We’ll be paying a lot more reparations to another group of people, too. [chuckling] At this particular point in time.

 

That Restrictive Immigration Act that you’re talking about now is, there’s no subtlety or no understanding of where it’s actually come from historically, like you’ve just talked us through. It’s just used, it’s weaponized now against the nation as just being inherently “racist” from its inception.

 

Frank Salter: Exactly! And what is not taught is that this goes back to some pretty wise people contributed to that policy. My favorite, I have two favorites. One is the great English scholar, what was his name? John Stuart Mill. The father of liberalism, by the way.

 

Damien Richardson: On liberty. Yes.

 

Frank Salter: Yeah. And the father of women’s rights. He wrote the first major essay on saying:

 

“This is outrageous, that women don’t have the vote!”

 

And so on.

 

So he was a really fundamental pioneer of liberalism. He wrote another book that the Left never talks about, [chuckling] which was called On Nationality. I think it was called On Nationality. And he said:

 

“You know, if you want to have a cohesive country, you need to have it formed from people of the same background.”

 

And you put it differently. He approached it from the point of view of individual rights, which you’d expect a liberal to do. What would a person with liberty choose? And he said:

 

“If you just look at the world, what people choose to do is live among their own kind. They choose that.”

 

And by the way, that’s true in Australia, now! It’s true in every multicultural society. You get people clustering! Clustering together! Not because they’re whipped there, but because they choose! They want it. They live among comfortable people.

 

Now, as intermarriage happens, that blurs, of course, and you get integration happening. But sometimes you don’t get integration happening. Like the American racial scene is a disaster! Because the intermarriage rate between black and white, it’s there, but it’s very low, at a very low standard.

 

Damien Richardson: So you talk about these things. What explains the inconsistencies? Because I think of many instances now, like India seems to remain predominantly Indian. There seems to be no problem with that. I guess they would point to the British Raj and they would use that as an excuse to say, you know:

 

“Look what happened when we let you guys in.”

 

Japan remains ostensibly Japanese.

 

And of course, the nation state you’re not allowed to talk about is made as ethnocentric as Israel, and that seems to maintain its ethnic identity without a problem.

 

So why is it a problem, as you outline right from the get go, that a White nation cannot identify itself as being such? Where’s that inconsistency coming from, that hypocrisy?

 

[16:43]

 

Frank Salter: I’m not sure, I’m not sure.

 

But this is a field of academic research that’s ongoing. I’m not sure, but I have some insights, I think. Some facts we can point at.

 

To begin with, multiculturalism is a “mongrel theory” or is a “mongrel movement”. I’m using that term advisedly, because we’ll call it an unholy alliance between the far-Left, radical, (((cosmopolitan))) Left.

 

On the one side. And they’re the master, the power center.

 

But they have as clients, minorities, typically immigrant minorities, but sometimes indigenous minorities. That’s the truth in Australia as well.

 

So multiculturalism is a combine of the far-Left and the far tribal Right, but limited to minorities.

 

Now how can such contradiction hold together? And the reason it holds together is they have a common enemy. Who’s that? It’s us! It’s Western nations who have brought in immigrants. And it’s based on a partly on a Marxist, fundamental Marxist critique of the West, of Western nations. Globalists and globalism is a strong thread in this. Globalism is opposed to borders per se. It’s opposed to identity, religious, cultural, ethnic, it’s opposed to all that it’s saying:

 

“It’s the brotherhood of man and sisterhood of mankind, utopia.”

 

So the utopia is:

 

“Oh, we’ll have a world government, and once we’ve had that, and once everyone’s mixed together and no borders, no more war! War will go! We won’t have any more war!”

 

So you have Mr Brown, the ex-head of the Australian Greens, for example, has been repeatedly calling for a “Global government”.

 

Damien Richardson: Yes

 

Frank Salter: Without thinking:

 

“What is in the interests of the Australian people?”

 

And the last thing we want is a global government elected on proportional representation.

 

Because if I lived in the third world, the first thing I would vote for is stripping Australia of its wealth and spreading it across, around the third world.

 

Of course, of course that’s what I want.

 

These Western societies, not all Western. Japan has done the same. South Korea has done the same. So Singapore has done the same. Have created a law governed basically with human rights, civil rights, tremendously wealthy, generous welfare systems. These are attractive societies. And other people are naturally they’re envious. They’re envious of that. And they want to be there if they can. Many of them want to be there.

 

I think a figure of something close to a billion people around the world want to move to the West, that would like to move to a Western country.

 

Damien Richardson: It’s an impossibility, isn’t it?

 

Frank Salter: No! It’s absolutely possible!

 

Damien Richardson: To have a billion people move to the West and for it to maintain its sense of self.

 

Frank Salter: Oh, you’ve added, you’ve added some conditions there! Yeah. Absolutely agree with you. It’s impossible if one wants to preserve the West.

 

But if you set that aside, as our cultural elites do, because our elites are not., … Our elites are, in effect, hostile. I think they’re more cold than hostile. They just don’t care. They don’t have a sense of identity.

 

There’s a great book written in Britain about ten years ago called The Somewheres and the Anywheres, that the fundamental divide in politics is between people who identify with the local.

 

Damien Richardson: Yes

 

Frank Salter: Identify as Australians or poms, or they identify as Germans or Hungarians or Chinese or whatever it might be.

 

And then you have this very small (((elite))), the 1% who could be anywhere.

 

[20:49]

 

Damien Richardson: Cosmopolitan, urban elite, internationalist in their understanding of place and location. Yeah.

 

Frank Salter: Exactly! And they send their children to whatever, international schools. And they’re so wealthy these people, are typically billionaires, or with wealth in the hundreds of millions. But not only they are financially secure, not only their children are financially secure, as the money trickles down, their grandchildren and great grandchildren will be financially secure! So they feel, and they live in gated suburbs. The children go to private elite schools.

 

So these are the modern citizens of the world. Basically they don’t care about anyone.

 

Damien Richardson: So it’s a new feudalism, isn’t it? It’s a new feudalistic class!

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, absolutely! So it’s becoming a mainstream view in the United States political science discipline, now that America has not been a democracy for quite some time. It’s a plutocracy.

 

Damien Richardson: And you talk about the Civil Rights Movement, you talk about it coming to Australia, particularly born in the US and coming to Australia around 69. Harold Holt is the so-called conservative prime minister, Liberal [Party] at the time.

 

So is democracy a shame? Is it just, there’s a bureaucratic global elite that is actually in control? It makes absolutely no difference who you would vote for, it’s just window dressing. It’s just a pretense to democracy, because it’s going to dominate no matter what this urban global elite want to happen. And it’s rolling out, as you say, rightly, across the West. It doesn’t matter who’s in power?

 

Frank Salter: I think there’s a lot of truth in that. I wouldn’t go that far, but I’m in that direction. I think that it’s getting that way. For example, it does matter who we vote for. There’s Left globalists and there’s Right globalists. The Right globalists are these very wealthy billionaires and so on.

 

The Left globalists are the Marxist, neo-Marxian, utopian thinkers. So it does matter who you vote for.

 

For example, just to give one recent example, in Australia, if one voted Labor, if Labour had continued to rule from Keating [Paul-Labor Party] on, the boats would not have been stopped. Labor was slow to drag themselves kicking and screaming to the realization:

 

“We must stop the boat people.”

 

Howard [John-Liberal Party], to his credit, to stopped that. Howard still in effect, a globalist, though. Because the legal immigration policy was flooding Australia, creating all these minority communities that didn’t have to be there. So he was a disaster for Australia! But a disaster of a different kind to Labor. You see what I mean?

 

Damien Richardson: But the trajectory was still the same. There was still an increase in net immigration to Australia under Howard from what had happened previously. You even say under Keating.

 

Frank Salter: Exactly! And what’s missing in all these policy areas is the “majority founding nation perspective”.

 

So that is blocked out in the West. By the way, not in India, where the Hindu nationalists have been ruling for many years now with Modi as their prime minister. Not in China, which has realized that Marxism is just rubbish and they’re moving to legitimize their rule, rather dictatorial rule, with ethno-nationalism.

 

Damien Richardson: Is it a National Socialist country, China?

 

Frank Salter: Yeah!

 

Damien Richardson: With the Han Chinese as the pre-eminent, …

 

Frank Salter: Yeah. The problem with using a term like that is you conjure up Nazi Germany and it gets, you know, it confuses the issue. But one might argue, technically they’re National Socialists. But that term itself is loaded. It has a lot of baggage. But they’re an ethnic nationalist, authoritarian government.

 

And Australia is not forming its immigration policy according to what they are. Australia’s immigration policy is being conducted as if we know nothing about ethnicity or nationalism! As if we know nothing! We know a lot! The social sciences have come a long way.

 

We know, for example, that ethnocultural, especially religious as well, diversity is negative. There are serious costs to social cohesion and to economic growth of diversity! But you wouldn’t know that if you look at Australian government policy, you wouldn’t know that they talk about the “joy of diversity”. They talk about “diversity as our strength”. That’s a complete lie! That’s a complete lie!

 

We know diversity is costly. And in the end, it lowers the threshold to civil war.

 

So there have been illustrious studies done by political scientists, have shown again and again, diversity is a risk factor for civil war, for breakdown and so on.

 

Civil conflict!

 

Damien Richardson: I’ve heard some people say that that’s potential for the US in particular, for there to be Civil War 2.0. Is that something you could envision happening?

 

Frank Salter: Well, it’s absolutely horrific if it happened! A way to approach it from a Political Science perspective would be the break-up of the United States. Is the United States heading in the direction of a break-up? And it is in that direction.

 

But I think there are tremendous barriers to a real civil war getting underway.

 

But its heading in that direction. For example, and it’s not just America. Around the West, trust in the government is just collapsing. Trust in the major political parties is falling away.

 

So in Australia, the major political parties have never enjoyed a lower, never had a lower support from the population. All these minor parties popping up, right. People are just losing confidence, losing trust in the government. I think belatedly. They should have lost his trust 50 years ago when it became obvious that the nation was no longer favored by the broader political system. Instead, minorities are being favored.

 

[27:25]

 

Damien Richardson: But it’s an impossibility to lose faith in it because what can you do? There’s a compulsory voting system and if you don’t vote, you’re outside of the system anyway.

 

So the system still continues on as a result. Because through the two party preferred system, it’s almost an impossibility to bring about any realistic change. And because weaponization of the media, of the corporate media, it won’t allow any voices to operate outside of the very particular Overton Window it creates.

 

That’s why your book is being ignored. And that’s why this conversation we’re having now, if it was to ever gain any mainstream traction, we would be dismissed as being “fascists”!

 

Frank Salter: I think you’re wrong, … Luckily! I think you’re wrong, gladly!

 

Damien Richardson: Yeah.

 

Frank Salter: What you just said is based on a lot of unfortunate facts.

 

But there’s another side to it. That the solution is not political, it’s cultural. Because what we’re suffering is the downstream effect of a Cultural Revolution in the sixties and seventies. So it’s cultural.

 

Next we have the Internet. So technological change has made it more and more difficult for elites to monopolize the means of cultural production and distribution against Marxism.

 

Damien Richardson: And that’s a real concern to them. That’s what their Misinformation, Disinformation Bill’s about, I’m sure.

 

Frank Salter: Absolutely, absolutely!

 

Now, one thing that’s fascinating is the closer we, especially the Anglo-sphere, comes to the majority being demographically submerged, so we can’t fight back politically because we’ll be in the minority. In America, it’s in 20 years time. 20 years time, they’re predicted to be minority White.

 

And Australia, we keep such poor records, it’s not difficult to know what the ethnic proportions are. But we’re on a similar track, I’d say maybe a bit longer. In Britain, it’s not as bad.

 

What’s strange is that the closer we get to that submergence and that final defeat, the more totalitarian the establishment’s becoming. We get these draconian laws coming in! With these so-called, it’s ironic, “Human Rights Commissions”! It’s quite ironic, Human Rights Commission. What are they there for?

 

Basically to crush the free speech of the majority! They’re essentially an anti-free speech organization!

 

Damien Richardson: Or the anti-White, aren’t they, in their underpinnings?

 

Frank Salter: Especially White! Especially White. They’re there to crush!

 

So why is that? Why are they becoming more draconian? And how can it be that every major social media company was on the side of, for example, the Covid lockdowns? They censored anyone, any Dissident Voices saying:

 

“Oh, hold on, what about the antivirals? Couldn’t we use it? Just use well tested antiviral?”

 

“No, no! You’re a terrorist! You’re a denier!”

 

You know, why is it happening now? And I don’t know why. But just to speculate. It could be that because they have the power, they’re doing it.

 

But that doesn’t explain. Elon Musk is a standout because he’s taken over Twitter time now. He’s taken it over and he wants more free speech in that area.

 

But why is he a standout? Why aren’t social media companies across the political spectrum? What you would expect. Some on the left, some on the Right, some of the most clustering in the middle. No, they’re all on the cosmopolitan Left! Censoring patriots, censoring people with different views on Covid or whatever the topic might be. How can that work?

 

Damien Richardson: Elon Musk is in a battle at the moment, isn’t he? With the ADL, the Anti-Defamation League, which is a jewish organization. And they’ve really gone after Musk because he’s opened up the people that can now engage with his social media platform, Twitter, now known as X. Platform X. That’s a really seminal fight, isn’t it? That’s a fight I would have never seen happening, even four or five years ago. That someone would take on the power of something like the Anti-Defamation League.

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, I prefer to call it the “DL”. The Defamation League. That’s what they define, destroy people’s careers and lives. They’re basically a hate group. ADL is a hate group!

 

Damien Richardson: That’s what they do now, isn’t it? They weaponize, … Take away your livelihood, …

 

Frank Salter: People don’t realize, that, for example, the de-banking movement, who was it? The, who’s the who’s the politician in the UK was just de-banked?

 

Damien Richardson: Oh, yeah, Nigel Farage.

 

Frank Salter: Yeah.

 

Frank Salter: But he’s just the latest.

 

Damien Richardson: He’s the tip of the iceberg as someone, that one that they’re willing to actually talk about. But there’s others have been de-banked, including Australian dissidents, for many years before now.

 

Frank Salter: One might not agree with their politics, but it’s typically on the Right. They don’t debank (((cosmopolitans))), they don’t debank people on the left, they don’t debank feminists, LGBTQI plus, whatever it might be! No, no! They wouldn’t be de-banked. It’s only patriots and people on the Right. Others on the Right.

 

But about the ADL, they’re not much of a jewish organization anymore, I can tell you. They have in the leadership, there’s severe criticizms of Israel. From their cosmopolitan perspective. Israel does not really have a right to exist as a jewish state. And if it’s not a jewish state, it’s really the whole Zionist mission has been frustrated. So Israel is also suffering from., … And it’s ironic because there’s a jewish contingent on the left. I understand that. But they’re often not friendly to Israel at all!

 

Damien Richardson: Jonathan Greenblatt heads it, doesn’t he?

 

[33:36]

 

Frank Salter: Jonathan Greenblatt! He’s no great friend of Israel, if you ask me. I don’t see that.

 

So they’ve become rogue in a way. They were initially a jewish organization, but they’ve become rogue. They’re not really friendly to Israel. Israel can only survive by controlling its borders, its immigration policy, for example. And making sure that they have a super majority within the country, not 100% majority, but a large majority.

 

The same thing goes for Hungary, for China, for Australia, for any country! If the state does not reflect the interests of the majority. Protecting minority rights, of course, that’s liberal democracy. You protect everyone’s individual rights. But group rights should be protected. The majority founding group should be protected, it seems to me.

 

And that’s what’s changed in Australia and America and Britain and across the West. The state apparatus has, since the 1970s, say, not supported the interests of the majority.

 

Now that’s an incredible statement! Because what would you expect in a democracy? Rule of the majority! With minority rights protected. That makes it a liberal democracy, not just democracy. Democracy can be savage, democracy can be unpleasant.

 

But if you have liberal democracy, you have individual rights protected constitutionally and legally. Separated, …

 

Damien Richardson: Equality under the rule of law. Equality under the rule of law.

 

Frank Salter: But that doesn’t mean that you can ignore the interests of the majority. Then it’s not even democratic anymore!

 

So this is what’s happened. And we need to somehow take back our countries and find a way to reverse this Cultural Revolution that’s occurred, where that has given us hostile elites!

 

Damien Richardson: How can that happen? How could it happen that the majority would be subsumed by a minority and the minority would have a whip hand, morally end up having a whip hand? It’s only because of the compliance of the majority, isn’t it?

 

So somehow it’s been weaponized against us through the institutions, particularly through education, where you feel a sense of guilt. They pick on Australia particularly and probably get to talking about The Voice debate that’s upon at the moment. The guilt that we’re given for our inhabitation of this landmass in the first place.

 

But somehow anyone that comes post Second World War is okay. They’re forgiven for inhabiting the land mass, but those with any antecedents before the Second World War are not forgiven.

 

Frank Salter: Exactly! And it’s universal.

 

So when I was living in Europe, my colleagues in Europe couldn’t believe. They said:

 

“Yeah. But France is especially evil because we had the we had the empire!”

 

Damien Richardson: Yes.

 

Frank Salter: Or the Germans would say:

 

“No, no, no! You’re okay. But we had the Holocaust in World War Two!”

 

And I said to them:

 

“Guys, you’re not special! We’re all in the same boat. In Australia we have the Aborigines, we have this. We were colonialists and we had the White Australia Policy! The White Australia Policy!”

 

And they looked at me, and I said:

 

“You’re not special. Every country, the majority, is demonized!”

 

Now, how can that be? Is Europe such an evil place, that uniquely evil? All the European countries must be replaced by other people! That’s the implication.

 

Damien Richardson: And that’s why the other people want to go there in the first place! Because inherently evil, that they can’t wait to get out of their own country and come potentially to start a new life with more prosperity in a Western democracy.

 

Frank Salter: That’s right. That’s right. I don’t know the answer to all this, but there are some strange things happening. You ask me how? Well, I can give some micro information on that.

 

For example, let’s consider, say, two prime ministers, Malcolm Fraser [Liberal Party PM 1975 to 1983] and Bob Hawke [Labor Party PM 1983 to 1991], absolutely instrumental in installing multiculturalism against the wishes of the Australian people.

 

Whenever the Australian people were polled:

 

“Would you want more Asian immigration?”

 

Or whatever it might be. And they said:

 

“Well, no, we’d actually prefer to remain who we are, actually.”

 

There was no great hatred involved, just normal human ethnocentrism! Ethnocentrism is an adaptive psychological state. It’s where you’re self regarding. You like your own children, doesn’t mean you hate other children. You just like you care mostly for your own children and for your own family.

 

And then it goes out to your neighbors and so on to your nation. It doesn’t mean you hate other people.

 

And if you don’t think that way, you can’t invest in anyone!

 

Because if you’re giving to the world, what does that mean actually, to give money to the world? It means nothing! It’s incredibly, incredibly selfish, in fact! Because you give to no one!

 

So Bob Hawke once admitted in an interview, he said:

 

“Look, it would have been impossible to establish multiculturalism, a nation, of non-White immigration, if both parties had not co-operated.”

 

Cooperation of the parties, a bipartisan policy. Before him, Malcolm Fraser, who many on the left see as some sort of hard Right figure. The guy was a, in effect, a neo-Marxist! He was a traitor to his class. He was a traitor to his country, in effect.

 

And he wrote in his memoirs, he said:

 

“I don’t believe the Australian people should be permitted to vote on immigration, because they always get it wrong! They just get it wrong! They get it wrong! Why can’t they be like me?”

 

Bob Hawke came along and gave us a famous speech, the Bicentenary. The tall ships are about to sail into Sydney Harbour, right? 200 years since 1788. So 26 January, the prime minister of the country stands up and gives this great speech and he said:

 

“There is no ethnic hierarchy in Australia. How do we define an Australian? There’s no ethnic hierarchy.”

 

“Ethnic hierarchy”, hat’s a really ugly, loaded term. What he meant was, what is Australian identity? And he said:

Damien Richardson: Unusual! Not a great cohort. Not a huge cohort. [chuckling]

 

Frank Salter: And say he falls in love with The Country Doctor, with A Country Practice, or whatever it might be.

 

Damien Richardson: Oh, yes, yes, yes, sir.

 

Frank Salter: Just imagine that. And he thinks:

 

“Wow, what a great country! I feel a real commitment to Australia!”

 

According to our prime minister, he’s an Australian. But contrast him with an Australian who’s not happy with some area of our policy, like our stance towards immigration laws.

 

Damien Richardson: Say, for example, … [chuckling]

 

Frank Salter: A lot of Australians are unhappy with current policy. And Bob Hook might say:

 

“Well, you’re not an Australian. You’re not an Australian! You don’t feel a commitment to Australia!”

 

But the person from Inner Mongolia is an Australian.

 

So the reason I’m reminded of this speech, because I hate to admit that I was alive at the time, but sees.

 

Damien Richardson: So was I Very young. Very young.

 

Frank Salter: [chuckling] Yeah. An interview given by John Howard recently, like three weeks ago, in which he referred to that speech and said:

 

“Yeah, everything he said was true.”

 

So John Howard did not have the intellectual nous to think this through for himself.

 

Now, how can that be? Well, the problem with this sort of micro approach of looking at this little example and what he said and what she said, is that it can miss the big picture.

 

The big picture is that every prime minister since Gough Whitlam [Labor Party PM 1972 to 1975] has basically been minority centric, has put minorities first, for example, in immigration policy. Every one! They can’t all have had bad character. It can’t be:

 

“Yeah, but he was selfish or he was nasty or he was a recovering alcoholic or he was haughty!”

 

No! There must be some systemic reason for it. There must be some, … And it’s to do with the Cultural Revolution. Again, it comes back to culture.

 

Damien Richardson: And it comes back to that globalist enterprise that we talked about earlier on. And it comes back to legacy for people that particularly say, Howard, for example, who got into so much trouble over the apology, etcetera, refused to apologize. Indigenous people turning their backs, painted in the media very much as being a racist, etcetera. Now think of his legacy. His legacy will be painted within the apparatus of state, which demands a multiethnic understanding of the West!

 

Frank Salter: Yeah.

 

So, I mean, if a politician wants to survive and work his or her way up through a major political party, there’s going to be screening, screening, along the lines you just stated. And if they get it wrong too often, they’ve got no future. They’ve got no future.

 

Damien Richardson: Well, they have no future within the political structure itself. It’s very clever, because there’s someone, you’ll have a colleague that can use it and weaponize it against you, to get rid of you as a potential opponent within the apparatus, whether it’s the Liberal Party, Labor Party, Greens, wherever, it makes no difference.

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, yeah. It’s a savage system!

 

Now, this can’t be explained without understanding the role of the media. The media have been very important. That’s why there’s such battles going on now, like Musk taking over Twitter and so on, we were discussing.

 

So this is another aspect that is not fully explained from my point of view. But the facts are there, that without the co-operation of the mainstream media, which began as just newspapers. The mainstream media was once just newspapers and there were very few universities, this sort of thing with that level of book reading and so on.

 

So it was the newspapers. And then you got newspapers and radio. And the newspapers, radio and television from the 1940s, fifties on. Why were they on side with this?

 

Well, one, from that theory of corporatism, corporate globalism, it sort of makes sense, that the big media companies were all bought by large global corporations.

 

Damien Richardson: They’re owned by them, they’re an extension of them, they’re an arm of them.

 

Frank Salter: I think the solution is going to be in that direction of corporate ownership and so on.

 

And this is why we’re having such turmoil right now, because the Internet has upset that power structure. To some extent.

 

Damien Richardson: To some extent. Because you get banned off the Internet very, very readily, very quickly.

 

Frank Salter: Exactly! And they began to look for ways to control access to the Internet from an early, … They realized this was a danger to them, and they began looking for ways of controlling that.

 

So again, along this line, which is sort of neo-Marxist, by the way, it’s sort of focusing on economic processes. So they began looking at that and buying up the major media companies, the major social media companies, I mean, big tech and so on.

 

So, the example of Musk is the exception that proves a rule. The example of these thousands upon thousands of small scale media, … Oh, such as yourself. You’re using this medium to get around this censorship and so on.

 

They’re the exceptions that sort of prove the rule, in a way.

 

Damien Richardson: Musk is an interesting figure, isn’t he? Because he wants to neuro link us all, he wants to microchip humanity.

 

Frank Salter: Well, I don’t know whether he likes to, but he’s got this corporation that’s working in that direction.

 

[46:19]

 

Damien Richardson: I’ll just say we’ve been here before, haven’t we? Like as a culture, Australia, there was a huge antipathy between Protestantism and Catholicism. Catholics need not apply for government jobs for a long period of time. Somehow we’ve seemed to have moved to a point beyond that. Is it a possibility. Like:

 

“Oh, what are we talking about with this? Because Australia is a multi-ethnic state now, you can’t unbake the souffle.”

 

Is there a possibility for us to move forward as a cohesive entity? Are you saying that demands a predominantly Anglo population and therefore that’s the defining identity of that community?

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, my approach is different. And in Anglo-phobia book, the position we take in that is the reality is, as you say, we have a diverse Australia, so that’s the reality. So Australia after World War Two 98 percent Anglo-Celtic. Was 98%. There was some lingering friction between the Irish Catholics and the Protestants, yes, and so on.

 

But that’s largely been overcome. Perhaps not in the New South Wales Labor Right, but it’s still largely overcome. That’s not the case anymore. So we’ve been diversified.

 

Now, because the nation is so diverse, one can’t talk about a single united interest always applying in Australia.

 

So, for example, in immigration policy, one might argue immigration policy should reflect the interests of the nation as a whole. Okay? That sounds noble. That sounds noble, and I support that.

 

But also, it’s difficult to have immigration policy without it favoring one group over another.

 

So, for example, every group wants access from its own group. Chinese, Australians, we don’t want discrimination against Chinese immigrants, Burmese, Greek, whatever it might be. Well, they can’t all be pleased! Unless we have an open door policy. We have an open door policy, it’s suicide for Australia! But if we do begin to restrict it, well, however we do restrict, it’s going to favor one group over another.

 

So what I think is necessary as a starting position is for Anglo Australians. And that’s a very broad category. It’s very broad. Anyone who’s assimilating into the mainstream Australian identity is for them to say, what about us? What about us? All these policies, multiculturalism, open door immigration policy has been formulated without our input!

 

In fact, the result of opinion polls, have just been ignored! They’ve just been ignored. There’s willful ignoring of Anglo interests in Australia!

 

And I think if Anglos are brought into the multicultural system, which theoretically is Democratic and fair, theoretically, multiculturalism says:

 

“Well, people should be able to express their own interests.”

 

Damien Richardson: Yeah

 

Frank Salter: That sounds reasonable. People should be able to vote and lobby according to their own interests and the interests of their religious or cultural community. Yes, that seems fair. Why shouldn’t they be able to do that?

 

But in reality, that’s not, … In reality, they say:

 

“Yes for all, except one, the Australian majority, except one group, can’t talk!”

 

Damien Richardson: But as you say, it’s happening globally, it’s happening in Europe and it’s happening in the US, it’s happening in New Zealand, I’m sure Canada here. Is it a fantasy in some respects, what you’re suggesting? Because power is power, and power will need an enemy, and power will vilify whoever it’s taking its power from. And now globalist structure is taking power from those former holders of that power, which is those communities, those Anglo Saxon, Celtic, western European communities.

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, look, I think the reality is we have oligopoly. We are an oligopoly globally. Rule of the rich, the rule of the powerful, of the elite. But we can’t stop resisting! We can’t stop resisting! Democracy was born going back to Magna Carta and so on.

 

Democracy was born by little people finding their champion, like the Catholic Church. The church in Britain helped Magna Carta in 1215. So different elites said:

 

“Yeah, we also have a problem with the King, with absolute power of the King.

 

We also have a problem with making rules up as he goes along. So we want rule of law.”

 

This sort of thing. So it’s always a struggle. It’s always a struggle. And we’ve had it so good in Australia and other Anglophone countries for so long that it’s been just taken. Taken for granted:

 

“Oh, yeah, it’s a free country!”

 

When I was a little boy, you say:

 

“You can’t do that!”

 

“It’s a free country!”

 

It was a free country. By historical comparison, the freest countries that have ever existed. But that had only come about through struggle, through fighting for our rights.

 

And now we’re technologically equipped with the Internet and so on, to establish our own parallel institutions, which I think is a very important movement taking place. And why not, in principle, create or influence our own banks? Banks that do stand by freedom of speech and freedom of association.

 

Damien Richardson: Is that happening?

 

Frank Salter: It’s actually happening.

 

Damien Richardson: People are building their own banking institutions?

 

Frank Salter: That’s beginning. The example I’ve come across is, what’s that? An American social media website. I’m so sorry. It escaped my mind!

 

Damien Richardson: That’s okay.

 

Frank Salter: It’s a Christian website. And I hear that this is a trend, very slow, but it is happening. So the parallel institutions are being set up. Jordan Peterson. Someone as famous as people will have heard of Jordan Peterson. He’s setting up his own university.

 

Damien Richardson: Yes.

 

Frank Salter: And there’s more than him. It’s not just him. There are others doing this, because they realize universities are critical to our survival. The survival of freedom. Absolutely!

 

Damien Richardson: That’ll be co-opted by the power structure as it is now, won’t it, and give you the pretense of there being alternative? But the power source will not allow an alternative power source to exist.

 

[53:32]

 

Frank Salter: Not necessarily. Not necessarily. I wouldn’t be too black pilled about it. A great term. I wouldn’t be too black pilled.

 

Of course, that is a trend, and one should keep a sharp eye for that happening. Co-option, of course, but it doesn’t have to be that way. I think the key thing to do is to raise consciousness. To raise consciousness, people need to be aware of who they are, of where they came from, of their history.

 

And it’s very much like back in the early days of the Civil Rights Movement in America, when black agitators, blacks who wanted their people to have civil rights, normal citizen rights, talked about raising consciousness, talking about history. It’s okay to be black. We have our own history. We have our own interests. Don’t be put down by this hegemonic White structure.

 

Now, that’s going back 1910, 1920, when you had Jim Crow.

 

So there was, in fact, there was oppression of black America and the Civil Rights Movement reversed that.

 

So I think we should never give up the fight for freedom.

 

Damien Richardson: That Civil Rights Movement’s now been weaponized as against White majority populations, though, hasn’t it?

 

Frank Salter: It has, it has! But America being what it is, which is a rule of law country and a democracy, tremendous strides were made by black Americans overcoming Jim Crow. Many of them did it by simply migrating out of the south, and they moved to the big cities and the big industrial cities in the north. And amazing pioneers such as Henry Ford would employ anyone at the same wage, anyone! That’s why they flocked, for example, to Detroit and so on, New York and other places. And they used whatever strategy they could and they made great strides.

 

And so you had a black middle class developing, and you had their own newspapers. Very important black newspapers developed. So they’d receive reliable news about themselves and about their, …

 

Damien Richardson: From an ethnic perspective.

 

Frank Salter: From an ethnic perspective. And in that, …

 

Damien Richardson: It comes back to a race all the time, doesn’t it? We’re not allowed to talk about race, but it comes back to race all the time.

 

Frank Salter: Well, it’s not just race. It can be culture, it can be especially important, …

 

Damien Richardson: Well, that’s part of it, …

 

Frank Salter: But no, race is, … Religion’s not part of race. These are different ways to form communities. Ethnicity is important, but it’s not unique. It’s not the only, …

 

Damien Richardson: But I grew up in an Irish Catholic tradition and I was struck when I went to Spain how it was still Catholic, but it was very different culturally. It was very different culturally because of the mores of that community, which I would say did come down to how they interpreted it through race, through that Christian tradition.

 

Frank Salter: Did you just say that they interpreted it through Christian tradition?

 

Damien Richardson: They interpreted the same, ostensibly the same Christian tradition. Catholic, Christian. But I grew up in an Irish Catholic understanding interpretation of it, which was very different than the Spanish interpretation of it was.

 

Frank Salter: How did race come into that?

 

Damien Richardson: Well, I just say it would be their cultural, their racial understanding of who they are, how they express themselves. There is a bio-spirit to a Spanish community which is different than the bio-spirit of an Irish community.

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, yeah. Well, Irish in Australia formed its attitudes as a diaspora. In Spain they’re in their ancient homeland.

 

So that’s one difference. And also., …

 

Damien Richardson: Sure, but I’m sure if you went to Ireland, you would see there’ll be a huge difference between Irish Catholicism and Spanish Catholicism, even in their homeland.

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, it could be.

 

And I think one pointed aspect, let’s bring this religious aspect back to the topic, connect it even more closely. The pastoral duty of the Church is up for grabs. It’s been changing and I think being undermined for the last 70 years. The Catholic Church once respected and promoted the ethnic interests of its people.

 

So the Catholic Church has always cared for the individual. It’s cared for the family, very much. Right. It’s cared for the local, for the clan, the extended family, and it cared for the local community.

 

So, for example, if a city was being besieged by barbarians or by the neighboring nation, the city was being besieged. And behind its medieval wall, … You go, in Europe, they all had these medieval walls. The church was not saying:

 

“Open the Gates! It’s the brotherhood of mankind! Open up! We’re all the same. Everyone’s the same!”

 

Damien Richardson: But we’ve evolved now! We’ve evolved, Frank. We’ve evolved to a new point, a new man, a new understanding!

 

Frank Salter: What they said was:

 

“God is on your side and it’s right for you to defend your city against the barbarians or against the next city state. It’s right!”

 

And there was excesses in that direction, of course, but they were basically loyal.

 

And you can see that within the framework of the pastoral duty of the Church, which serves different layers of interests from individual to family to nation to ethnic group. That’s all gone now! There’s no pastoral duty by the mainstream church, by many minorities, but not the mainstream churches, especially my own, the Church of England, Anglicans. There’s no sense of pastoral duty to the nation.

 

Instead, they’ve adopted a minority centric perspective of critiquing! They’ve taken on board this critique of majority cultures, which is insane! It’s madness!

 

Damien Richardson: It’s part of the institutionalization of the West, isn’t it really? The same structures that controlling organized religion, as any other department we’ve already covered.

 

Frank Salter: And all these Bishops go through the same university system, by the way, they’re subject to the same indoctrination.

 

[1:00:21]

 

Damien Richardson: I just want to, because we could be here for another hour. It’s such an engrossing conversation. Clash of civilization. There’s so much going on.

 

But before we do, because I know soon we’ve got the vote in Australia for recognising an indigenous voice to Parliament and I know you’ve written an article on behalf of the British-Australian Community, which is your website as well, the BAC, I might add. What’s the name of the it’s actually a book you’ve written. What’s the name of the book?

 

Frank Salter: The book is The Voice to Parliament: A Statement on Behalf of the British-Australian Community by Frank Salter.

 

Damien Richardson: So, Frank, that’s a very countercultural thing to say, that a voice to Parliament should have a statement on behalf of the British-Australian community.

 

Can you just talk us through that? And what you see resulting in at the referendum on the 14th of this month.

 

Frank Salter: The one extraordinary thing about this whole Voice process, developing the referendum questions and all the rest of it, if you go back and look at the different deliberative bodies, the different consultative bodies, and so on, that were formed beginning in 2011, I think. 2011, 12.

 

Damien Richardson: Under Julie Gillard [Labor Party PM 2010 to 2013]. [chuckling]

 

Frank Salter: Under Julie Gillard. They have, of course, representatives of the indigenous people, Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders.

 

Of course they have people who are loyal members of those communities. Not only loyal members, but leaders of those local communities coming and saying:

 

“What’s in our interest? My people want this, we want this. These are our interests.”

 

Completely appropriate.

 

They had a lot of White supporters of those. Of those, also understandable.

 

They didn’t have one representative of the Anglo majority, not one! They had lots of Anglos, but they didn’t have one person who was there saying:

 

“I feel sympathy for the indigenous people, of course, I wouldn’t be here otherwise. But I represent the interests of Anglo Australia.”

 

Not one! And I’ve traced it back to 2011, 12. It’s extraordinary!

 

And so this whole thing has been formulated as if Anglo Australia is not in crisis! As if Anglo Australia is just still the boss and it’s a White run society. No, no! Since 1970, roughly, as we’ve been, as we were discussing earlier, immigration policy and multicultural policy has been run against the White majority! We’ve been marginalized! We’ve been vilified in the education! Our children are being vilified, are being taught to hate their own history, to hate their own ancestors. And now we’re being asked:

 

“Oh, you should vote for a special powers being given to an advisory body in the Constitution.”

 

Extraordinary! As if we don’t exist, as if we have no interests.

 

So I wrote this book, it’s a short book, looking at this systematically, looking at the whole Voice proposal from an Anglo perspective.

 

In other words, yes, I’m concerned about what’s good for Indigenous Australians, my fellow citizens, of course, but also keeping in the back of my mind, and is it good for the Anglos? And no one talks about that!

 

Damien Richardson: No reviews on that book either, I can imagine. [chuckling]

 

Frank Salter: The closest to it is Jacinta Price, who calls herself a Celtic indigenous person. A Celtic Aboriginal person, she proudly says:

 

“Well, my father has Celtic background.”

 

In other words, Anglo:

 

“And my mother is indigenous.”

 

So she comes closest to that. I think Warren Mundine also has talked about this.

 

Damien Richardson: It’s interesting, something I know. I read a chapter from the book and you talked about the dispossession of Anglo institutions. It’s really just such a counter cultural concept that Anglos might even feel like they are being dispossessed. Because what we hear all the time, of course, is that indigenous Australians were dispossessed.

 

Frank Salter: Yes, well, they were dispossessed. But then, luckily for them, though, they were integrated into a culture that was leading the world in forming liberal democracy.

 

So, you know, that Aboriginal, in most of Australia, Aboriginal men, because initially it was male male suffrage, they got the vote before Englishmen got it in England! Well, before! Like mid 19, mid 19th century that you had in New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Tasmania. Not Queensland, Queensland and Western Australia, as the frontier states were delayed, that was delayed.

 

But in most of Australia they got the vote before British men and women got it in Britain.

 

So it was good for them. But the dispossession that’s been taking place as a result of the Cultural Revolution of the sixties and seventies. I have a chapter called Our Stolen Commonwealth. Our stolen Commonwealth. And what do I mean by that?

 

Well, just what I’ve been saying, the Anglo nation. First the six Anglo colonies, and then they gave rise to the Commonwealth in 1901. They were set up explicitly to benefit the majority. These are Democratic societies, and they were overwhelmingly Anglo societies, so naturally they wanted to survive and continue their traditions and their identity.

 

The Commonwealth was set up explicitly to serve the interests of the nation, which was an Anglo nation. That was reversed by 1970! That was reversed! In effect the Commonwealth has been stolen from us, in effect, and it’s now operating against our interests.

 

And I define the Commonwealth not just as government institutions, but as the ABC, for example, SBS, public broadcasting. Since the late 1960s, …

 

Damien Richardson: All the institutions, I would say, Frank

 

Frank Salter: All major institutions, have joined this Deep State apparatus, and, in effect, they’re operating against the interests of the majority.

 

[1:07:27]

 

Damien Richardson: It’s interesting, and we’ve been going for a while, so I’ll try to wrap it up. But I saw a speech the other day by Noel Pearson at the Press Club, where he made this claim. And he spoke to “multicultural” Australia, meaning not “settler” Australia, and he called, quite deliberately, “settler Australia”, being those mob, he would say, from the UK. And he said to multicultural Australia:

 

“I want to ask you this question. Who do you side with in this debate, as far as The Voice is concerned, do you consider yourself going to be an honorary settler somehow? Because, I tell you, a lot of you are the wrong color.”

 

I couldn’t believe what I was hearing! He didn’t sort of get much opprobrium in the mainstream, because the mainstream would never want to be seen to criticize someone indigenous. And of that state stature. A man, too, has made himself a millionaire out of the largesse of taxpayers expense. It was an extraordinary claim to make. And really, if you start to boil it down, since he’s asked the question, I would say:

 

“Well, actually, those people of different color that have come to this nation have come this nation expressly to live by what was bequeathed to them by that settler culture, not to come and live as hunters and gatherers might have lived in this idealized picture of Indigenous Australia!”

 

Frank Salter: Yeah

 

Damien Richardson: I think Noel himself seems very comfortable living like a settler, too, I might add!

 

Frank Salter: And receiving $500 million investment over the last 15 years.

 

Damien Richardson: Is he relying on the fact that he knows no one will have the gumption to make that claim? He’s relying on. We have been silenced through the multicultural instrumentalities that we’ve already talked about?

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, he’s arisen, his career, his reputation is arisen, sheltered in sort of the sheltered workshop of the multicultural system. So he’s a creature, in my view, a creature of the multicultural establishment.

 

But Warren Mundine is not. Jacinta Price are not. They’re actually free thinking. They have their, … I don’t agree with everything they say, but these are independent individuals far more able to sustain a rational conversation and so on.

 

Pearson talks ideology. And he begins preaching immediately and he can barely talk! And how did someone like that gain such a high reputation? Was because the Sydney Morning Herald, the Melbourne Age, the ABC, SBS [Special Broadcating Service] treat him as some sort of paragon. It’s absurd!

 

The man has made vulgar, racist remarks about White people, really vulgar. The man has said:

 

“I don’t think Anzac Day is appropriate because we should focus on my people’s suffering, not on the suffering of Anzacs.”

 

Damien Richardson: Well, a lot of these people would have been Anzacs too, as a matter of fact.

 

Frank Salter: Exactly, exactly! Aborigines have been participating more and more in the nation. I see them as a core group in the Australian national identity. But Pearson has been given this platform. He writes a note, he has these extraordinary media platforms to express his point of view, but he’s actually, when you listen to what he’s saying, it’s not pleasant.

 

Damien Richardson: You see now, too, that the conservative Right salivating over the idea of Jacinta Price someday being the first indigenous female prime minister. Janet Olbrixen wrote an opinion piece in the Australian recently saying such.

 

Frank Salter: Well, after watching her perform over the last month or two, I tend to agree. I think she’s actually prime minister material. There’s not all that much talent on the coalition side. And she just comes across as authentic, as able to think on her feet.

 

For example, her speech, become famous speech now to the Canberra Press Gallery about a week or two ago. And she said, her opening remarks she said:

 

“My husband’s sitting over there. And I do mean husband, not partner!”

 

Damien Richardson: Yes, yes.

 

Frank Salter: Immediately there was a cheer went up across Australia. We’re sick of this ideological language that’s being forced on you! She meant her husband, not her partner!

 

Damien Richardson: She went further too, and she talked about the oppression. She said:

 

“I’ve got it really badly if you’re saying I’m oppressed because I’m indigenous.”

 

And she said:

 

“Well, at least I wasn’t bequeathed to a man much older than me that I might have been under tribal law at the age of 14 or something.”

 

And she went on to say, too:

 

“And I’ve been doubly oppressed because my convict ancestors were also oppressed to come here in the first place!”

 

You could hear crickets in the media establishment.

 

Frank Salter: So funny. They’re just, … Like the ABC has become., … It’s so appalling! The main change with them is not ideological, because the news and current affairs was captured by the Marxist left in the late sixties, and the Science Show was captured by the Marxist left around the same time. What has changed is their subtlety. They used to sort of cover it a bit and make gestures to being balanced. That’s all gone. It’s amazing! It’s blatant. It’s blatant now.

 

And the same with our education system, with the curriculum. The national curriculum was captured by the neo-Marxist Left decades ago and that’s trickled down to the state curricula now. So it’s really, really poor.

 

Damien Richardson: And there’s been no defence against it from neo-liberalism on the other side, has there been? Because that’s just been about the bottom line, the bottom dollar, sell as much as you can. We’ve sold our soul to material wealth in many respects.

 

Frank Salter: Yeah. And they’re friendlier towards Right-wing globalism, which is corporate based.

 

So that’s their weakness.

 

Also, they receive all their funding from these people, so they’re not going to criticize them very much.

 

So again, on the Right you have Right globalism, on the left you have Left globalism. And the two sort of nudge, nudge, wink, wink, sort of they get along, they sort of get along.

 

But I urge Australians to look at the whole indigenous issue, including The Voice referendum, which comes up in nine days or something, and look at it from different perspectives. But look at it also from an Anglo perspective, from the perspective of mainstream Australia. And what we don’t want, for example, is to destroy and complicate our system of government, which is magnificent. It’s one of the things that sets Australia apart. We have the rule of law, we have representative democracy, we have division of powers and so on. And this would be compromised.

 

[1:14:42]

 

Damien Richardson: That’s just another irony of Pearson’s speech, isn’t it, that:

 

“Well, I want an indigenous voice to Parliament, but I don’t want anything that the settlers, ..!”

 

What? The incongruity is just extraordinary!

 

Frank Salter: I don’t look on myself as a settler. You know, I had a convict ancestor in Van Diemen’s Land. So for many generations, my family’s been here, I don’t think of myself, …

 

Damien Richardson: But even if we take his language on face value, what he means is “what came here?” Well, that was the Parliament. The Parliament that now “I want a specific voice to” is not of indigenous origin, although you would say it is because we’re indigenous!

 

Oh, this argument could go on and on and on! We’ve had such a good chat, too, Frank. I’m just aware of time, and I want people to stay to the end of this podcast.

 

So I think, do you want to just tell us where people can find you so they can find out more of this detail? We may well have you back to continue this conversation, perhaps post the referendum.

 

Frank Salter: That’d be fun. People can just Google, just a general search for British-Australian Community. And we have a website, which is the BritishAustralianCommunity.com dot au.

 

And then they can search for, … You go to Quadrant online. Go to Quadrant Online. There’s a Quadrant website and just do a search for “Salter”, and up will come all my articles, because I have a series of articles on the original, ten years ago, on the original attempt by Pearson to have a constitutional recognition. That was his big thing back then. So there’s critique of that.

 

So you’ll find resources.

 

One thing you’ll find is that this book as a PDF. It’s a free download so you can get access to the book.

 

I’d also go to YouTube. We have three videos out on YouTube. Search for British-Australian Community and it will come up. We have two on Anglophobia and we have one on The Voice. And there’ll be many more coming up, by the way, many more in the next months.

 

Damien Richardson: It’s good that you’re getting culture out there because I think this process was so far behind the eight ball as in understanding what’s happening to the culture, the attack that’s on it, the manifold attacks that are on it, that you almost need to reinvigorate what the understanding of the culture was in the first place.

 

So Frank Salter, co-author of Anglophobia: The Unrecognized Hatred, thanks so much for joining me at Damienrichardson dot online.

 

Frank Salter: It’s been a pleasure, Damien.

 

Damien Richardson: You can listen to more great podcasts on my website, damianrichardson dot online. Also follow me on Facebook and I’d love to hear your thoughts@facebook.com. Damienrichardson28 don’t forget to give this video a like. Remember to share and comment, to join the conversation and have your say.

 

[1:17:50]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

YouTube Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/22/2024 = 0)

 

==========================

See Also

top

Kevin Barrett: Welcome Droopsy Hot Radio, broadcasting live from the [word unclear], the rooftop studio here in beautiful Stadia, Morocco. I’m Kevin Barrett, bringing on the most controversial, interesting, thoughtful, and often well informed guests that you’ll ever see in audio and video. And we are, of course, broadcasting live in video now here on Revolution Radio. Where you can find the ultimate in the free speech experience. No de-platforming, no censorship, nothing like that here at Revolution Radio.

 

Please support Revolution Radio however you can go to that website and figure out how. You can support me Kevin Barrett, at Kevin Barrett dot Substack.com. You can also check out my column over at the Unz’s Review at unzreview.com dot, and you can go to truthjihad.com to find even more rubrics. And I do still edit over at Veterans Today.

 

All right, let’s see what we can get going with here we have an interesting lineup today as usual. In the second hour, Fadi Lama comes on with an incredible new book which I finally got a chance to read. It’s called Why the West Can’t Win. And it’s a very good read. It goes into all of the reasons for the rise of the money power bankster dictatorship in the Western world, and the reasons that that dictatorship or that attempt to create a one world order based on the power of usury is, in fact, doomed! He provides strong empirical evidence for that.

 

Doctor Fadi Lama is a PhD in engineering, mechanical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and he is also at, what does he have, other engineering degrees from other institutions! He’ll come on in the second hour.

 

The first hour, Doctor Kevin MacDonald just put out a great new piece called The Extreme Hyper Ethnocentrism of Jews on Display in Israeli Attitude Towards the Gaza War. And that’s what we’re going to talk about in the first hour, if we can find Kevin MacDonald. There we go.

 

Hello, Kevin. I can hear you now.

 

Kevin MacDonald: Yeah, I don’t know what happened. Turned all the way up. It never had not worked before. I don’t understand it. I don’t get it.

 

Kevin Barrett: Yeah, well, I mean, it’s always conceivable that some of the usual suspects are sabotaging us, but it’s also quite possible that something else is going on. But I don’t know what it would be.

 

So let’s talk about your new article. I was just introducing it on the Extreme Hyper Ethnocentrism of jews on Display in Israeli Attitude Towards the Gaza War. And the striking things about your article, I guess, are the pretty serious warning about the fate of Gaza could be the fate of other countries and of the West. A lot of people, of course, would think that’s exaggerated. I’m not so sure.

 

[03:14]

 

So maybe you can elaborate on that. Why is the genocidal mania that’s overtaken Israel is related to jewish ethnocentrism and how that’s actually a threat to the West as well?

 

Kevin MacDonald: Yeah, well, I think every time jews have had, you know, absolute power, as they did in the Soviet Union for 20, 30 years there, and they have exercised it brutally against their enemies. And I’m concerned that we’ll see that again.

 

Now, you see, and you see it, you know, look at the Old Testament. I mean, all the injunctions for all the desires for genocide of these people who are their enemies. And all the jewish religious writing saying basically that gentiles are another species, they’re below us, they’re basically animals and that sort of thing.

 

And then you see that rhetoric regarding the Palestinians, and you will see that regarding Europeans. Because if and when we lose power, we haven’t lost power yet, obviously.

 

But I’m just concerned about the future because clearly the jewish establishment is desiring more and more immigration. So all the Western European countries, United States, Canada, Australia, they will all be minority White countries at some point. White people may not have enough power, political power, to really resist what is going on. And I just fear that jewish ethics is entirely self centered! For the interests of the group, nothing more! And completely the opposite of western ethics, which is universalist. You know, Kant’s categorical imperative.

 

Basically, you do what anybody else could do in that situation, you’d be okay with it.

 

So it’s like that sort of western universalism, which is unique in the world, really. Other cultures tend to be very ethocentric and they privileged their own group. But the West has this long liberal tradition really stemming from the Enlightenment, but in a way going earlier than that. And I trace it back to evolutionary roots in my book on Western Individualism. But that’s the basic idea that the West is tied to universalism. And there’s this sense that we should be universalist. It’s the moral thing to do, that we should basically take care of other people and see their point of view and all that.

 

Jewish ethics isn’t completely foreign! You know, it’s like you don’t care about what they think. The more Orthodox you get, and the Orthodox have taken over Israel. And I like today I get this email from Jonathan Greenblatt, the head of the ADL, and he’s been in Israel. He comes back to this message and basically he says:

 

“What happened on October 7 was anti-semitism.”

 

And you always see this by the jewish apologists that there is no context to what happened on October 7. There’s nothing about the blockade that’s been going on since 2003, nothing about all the oppressive policies that Israel’s engaged in over the years.

 

And what Israel’s doing is absolutely destroying Gaza! It’ll never really come back for years and years, if ever.

 

[07:35]

 

Kevin Barrett: Let me just question the idea that the West is so much more universalist and completely non-ethnocentric.

 

I mean, I think there’s some truths you’re talking about.

 

Kevin MacDonald: I don’t say it’s completely non-ethnocentric. Okay. But there certainly can be ethnocentric, but it’s relatively less than other cultures. And again, if you look at Joseph Heinrich’s book as well on Individuals in the West. He talks about how unique Western culture is. He talks about western universalism. And that’s exactly the big point of my book.

 

We are different. And it’s a problem now because western universalism, it’s hard to oppose these movements, these jewish intellectual movements and political movements, because they’re always phrased in universal terms. They’re always phrased in moral terms. And Westerners are suckers for that!

 

I mean, they want to be good people. Westerners don’t rely on kinship. They rely on being a good person in the group, having a good reputation.

 

And right now, Western culture is completely determined by these often jewish elites in the media and the academic world and so on.

 

So what needs to be a good person is to be totally accepting of immigration and your culture is nothing special, and let them come in and don’t worry about anything in the future.

 

But in-group out, group conflict, based on ethnicity has been going on forever, and it’s not going to stop now!

 

So I’m pessimistic about the future because I don’t see any big force in the West trying to turn back this tide. It’s just not going to happen.

 

Kevin Barrett: Yeah, I actually, over time, I’ve become more sympathetic to your viewpoint. You know, when we first started having these discussions on my radio show, I don’t know, ten years ago or something, I was still, you know, kind of holding you at arm’s length and saying, but this and that.

 

Over time, I’ve realized that there’s a lot more truth to what you’re saying and a lot more of a good scholarly basis to your work than maybe I had realized, probably, than a lot of other people realized, too.

 

Let me say, however, I still think that when we talk about Western universalism, the way it manifests itself and often has in going back a ways in the history, is actually not much better, maybe even worse, than the kind of traditional tribalism of a lot of other traditional people.

 

That is, if you look at the way Americans behaved in Vietnam, with Korea, with Vietnam, with Indonesia in 1965, and all of these other “Holocaust”, quote, unquote, “the American Holocaust” that Chomsky and Wolczak wrote about in their book on Western terrorism, where they came up with about 60 million people murdered by US military and CIA interventions since World War Two.

 

The ugly American who goes to these places and murders millions of people to try to impose the American way and American hegemony on these cultures. He thinks he’s universalist, and he uses universalist propaganda in his media back home to get the people to imagine that they’re doing something universalist and non-ethnocentric. But there’s nobody more ethnocentric than an arrogant universalist who thinks that his way is the universal way!

 

And so I kind of question whether this so-called universalism has made Westerners so kind and nice and gentle. You know, when you take those 60 million people that the US murdered since World War Two, then you add another 30 million or so with a post 9/11 era, it seems to me that these kind general universalists are actually a lot more murderous than the tribalists.

 

Kevin MacDonald: Yeah, the Western culture has always been very militarized and very expansive and also been very inventive and prone to adventurism.

 

I mean, the Indo-European legacy in Western culture is basically that. And the West has been extremely successful, unlike other cultures when they had been able, … You look at around the world, cultures that have been successful have expanded. They have dominated other peoples and all that.

 

But the West, you know, there’s these two traditions in the West. One is that Indo-European militarized version, and that is still there to some extent. But you also have now, especially since 1965. I mean, before that, it was anti-communism, and they were very concerned, correctly so.

 

I mean, the Soviet Union was a dangerous foe, and they were opposing communism, I get it. But especially since 9/11 we’ve had these wars basically for Israel, and we have a new elite in the country. It’s a very aggressive leap. They want to maintain western hegemony desperately. That’s why we’re fighting in Ukraine, and we’re upping the ante now. They’re allowing Ukraine to target Russia. And so, yeah, that’s a part of our reality.

 

But you think about say, slavery. You know, we, Western conquest in America, then they brought in slaves from Africa and all that.

 

But, yeah, it was also, Western culture is the only culture that ended it for moral reasons. And this northern European culture of radical individualism. And they condemn slavery in the 19th century, especially the British started there, and they ended slavery in 1831. They abolished the slave trade in 1808 or something like that. And, it’s no other culture. I mean, you look around the world, slavery was endemic to just about every culture in the world.

 

So Western culture is now being singled out for things that other cultures have done throughout history.

 

But, yeah, there’s some ethnocentrism there, and it’s just relatively submerged. It’s easily overcome. I mean, you can make, they did this experiment where they had college students come in and they gave them a bunch of questions or pictures, photos, and they said:

 

“Well, your responses were racist, anti-semitic”

 

Or something like that. Boy, when they showed them, when they went through it again, the people responded much more slowly. They don’t want to feel they’re a bad person! And we see that over and over again, especially among women. Women want to fit into the group. They want to be nice people! And now the culture is totally anti-Western, anti-White, anti-European.

 

[15:32]

 

Kevin Barrett: Yeah, the culture has certainly gone to extremes lately. Speaking of the tribalism and stuff, I have a good anecdote for you. I’m living in Morocco now, and I’ve had some, let’s say, difficulties working with the local zoning authorities and construction guys, putting up a little room on the top of the house to house a library.

 

So it’s been quite frustrating. And I talked to a couple of in-laws, a couple of friends, and they talked. They said:

 

“You know, if you want to get any construction done or any repairs done in Morocco, it’s hopeless! It’s crazy! These people, they’ll eat your lunch, they’ll steal you blind and stuff, and they’ll do a terrible job.”

 

And so I said:

 

“Well, so how did you guys get your excellent houses built?”

 

And they both said:

 

“Well, my cousin!”

 

[chuckling]

 

Kevin MacDonald: Exactly!

 

Kevin Barrett: Yeah. Each of them had hired a cousin one of them had, had to fire the first guy he hired who wasn’t a cousin and bring in his cousin who just happened to show up at the right point.

 

And you know, that’s, I think, a kind of a common thing around the world. Doesn’t mean that there’s no use of universal dimension to the culture here or in other places where they still have these kinship ties. But it is different from the United States and also Europe today. And these cultural differences are real and you should be allowed to talk about them.

 

Kevin MacDonald: Yeah, that’s the problem with the third world, is in kinship. If you a job or something like that, you’re expected to., … Well, you expect kin to help you out, you know, as long as you’re related. It’s all about kinship. African cultures are like that. Extremely so!

 

It happens in Europe, but much less. That’s the thing about Europe. You have these high trust cultures where your reputation group is not dependent on being a relative. It’s dependent on, are you trustworthy, can I do business with you? That sort of thing.

 

And so you don’t have to rely on your cousin to build your house. And you don’t expect the person to cheat you, that sort of thing. That’s why Western culture has been so successful.

 

But that’s the problem. It hasn’t stopped in other parts of the world. It’s absolutely hardwired in those cultures. The Middle East, but also Africa. You know, China has always been that way, actually tribal and all that, collectivists. But they seem to be able to square the circle. But there’s a lot of corruption, but they clamp down on it, and the central government, to some extent at least, really does not want that. And they get it about trust.

 

[18:34]

 

Kevin Barrett: There are these ideologies, whether universalist or nationalist, that seem to play a role in kind of overcoming the tribalism.

 

And in fact, in Islamic history, the success of the religion of Islam and the legal system and the weights and measures and the injunctions to fair trade with everybody, not just your relatives, that played a big role in the bringing together of tribal peoples into a super tribe, or a huge world straddling kind of empire where people could trust each other. You could travel from one end of the earth to the other and not be robbed.

 

So, and I think with China, the ideologies of communism and now kind of Confucian nationalism play that kind of a role.

 

And then that leaves the question of could the West be saved by some sort of return to the religious roots that actually produced the great works of the West and produced this universalism that seems to have fallen upon hard times now as the West enters its decadent phase.

 

I just attended a conference in Croatia with Doctor E. Michael Jones and a bunch of Catholics. I was one of the two token Muslims there. And those folks are hoping for a revival of Catholicism to revive the West. I’m a bit skeptical, but I do think that these kinds of religions or greater religious like ideologies are really the only thing that can get people to sacrifice for something bigger than themselves and overcome these pitfalls of tribalism and human nature. But I know you’re not an advocate of that, so why not?

 

Kevin MacDonald: Well, I’m not religious myself. I just can’t see any evidence for it, you know, sort of scientific. And my basic paradigm is evolution and evolutionary biology, and I just don’t see room for that.

 

But I can see, I do think that religion is good. I mean you think about the Reconquista in Spain. They were very religious, and they treated the Muslims and threw them out. And European Christianity served Europe well for a very long time. Once you got to the 19th century and science and then, you know, militant Marxism and everything, you know, some of it is jewish, but I think a lot of it isn’t. It’s just the changes in intellectual, the scientific perspective sort of militates against that. And I don’t know!

 

But I do think if you look at America, religious Conservatives are, you know, mainstay in the Republican Party. You know, I don’t agree with all their substantive things.

 

I mean, they seem obsessed with abortion. But they’re good on average.

 

But then you look at the mainstream religions and they’re all into this stuff, and it’s pretty much universal, the Southern Baptist. I mean, the officialdom there. For example, James Edwards is a good guy who’s in Tennessee, political, successful guy. He’s been basically shunned by these people.

 

And I grew up Catholic and Catholic Church, as far as I can see, the pope is a communist. I mean, he’s way on the Left.

 

[22:09]

 

Kevin Barrett: Well, he did just say something about how there’s too much faggotry these day!

 

Kevin MacDonald: Too much what?

 

Kevin Barrett: He used to use the slur, the anti-homosexual slur. He said there was too much faggotry in the Church. [chuckling]

 

Kevin MacDonald: And then he profusely apologized.

 

Kevin Barrett: Yeah.

 

Kevin MacDonald: I mean, it is true. But he’s been all in favor of immigration and all that.

 

Kevin Barrett: Yeah, yeah. That’s why this made such a big splash was its the first thing this pope has ever done that wasn’t politically correct and woke!

 

Kevin MacDonald: Yeah, exactly!

 

Kevin Barrett: But, Kevin, don’t you think, though, that the issue here is really that these, you know what’s left of Christianity in the West is mostly just sort of fronting for the real religion of the West, which is secular, progressive, materialist humanisms and that that real religion which has underline all of these kinds of liberal tendencies that you and I both are skeptical about, that actual religion, which involves something overcoming the normal human condition in a kind of pretty extreme submission to something greater than the self and to transcendent values, which is very foreign, of course, to the secular outlook, but also to the kind of these namby pamby liberal religions that we’re talking about today as not being solutions. I agree they’re not. But I think I’ve heard arguments, including from some recent radio show guests, that real religion actually might be the solution.

 

But the only way it’s ever going to come back is when the civilization collapses and people are fighting for survival in red and tooth and claw.

 

Kevin MacDonald: Yeah, I mean, this, you know, Western culture has been expansive that we’ve said, and it’s also with capitalism, it’s greedy, materialism, and we want things, and as all humans do. Everybody would be rich than poor, I guess.

 

Kevin Barrett: Kevin, if you could hold your phone a little stiller, that would be better because we’re getting a lot of, …

 

Kevin MacDonald: Yeah, it’s what the Western culture is now ugly! You know, I’m rooting for Russia in the Ukraine war because to me, Western culture is completely bankrupt! You know, it’s gone, completely woke.

 

And if Ukraine would win, you’d have more mass immigration, there would be, religion would take a dive ultimately, and Ukraine would just become another vassal of the West, where traditional Ukrainian culture would be condemned, as there already. There’s a long, fraught history with jews and Ukrainians.

 

But anyway, you know, that’s the problem. The West is completely corrupt as far as I can see, and it’s not getting any better. In a sense, it is, as you say, I mean, secular humanism, greed, wanting material things and that sort of thing. That’s what we want.

 

[25:42]

 

 

Kevin Barrett: And how about what’s the role of this jewish ethnocentrism that you just wrote about in this new article in The Decline of the West and even a threat of some kind of global tyranny. We know that the mythology of jewish religion involves, as you wrote in the article, kind of these messianic millenarian expectations that the jews will one day triumph over the goyim or all the non-jewish peoples and basically enslave them and rule the earth.

 

And we do see that jews have become the most powerful ethnic group in the world probably, by taking over the US Empire. And now they’re completely out of control in their own ethno-state over an occupied Palestine and ready to tear down the Islamic world’s oldest and greatest architectural monument, the Al-Aqsa Mosque, and put up a blood sacrifice temple and start sacrificing pink heifers to symbolize this new era in which jews rule the world. And their mythology tells them that every jew will have, I forget how many thousands of goyim slaves.

 

Now, of course, that all sounds pretty exaggerated and it sounds like a pipe dream, but the role that jews are playing in this process does seem outsized and rather dangerous and destructive, does it not?

 

Kevin MacDonald: It is very destructive and dangerous. And we see that Israel is continuing this offensive in the south of Gaza now, despite the fact that all these nations, I mean, it’s hard to, I can’t think of any country that’s gung-ho in favor of what Israel’s doing, but they’re just thumbing their nose at it. They don’t care! Your international criminal court, what was the arrest, Netanyahu and all that, it doesn’t matter. They are in the driver’s seat and they know they have America completely in their hands! And that’s the reality. And they will use America as long as they can.

 

And, yeah, they are in the driver’s seat right now, but we’re not at the end game yet. But, yeah, jewish power is really on display here! I mean, you think of all the European countries, America, the Biden administration even, is condemning what they’re doing. Then they say they’re going to withhold weapons and they don’t really do that.

 

But anyway, it’s amazing what the power that they have.

 

Kevin Barrett: Yeah. And it’s kind of just over the top sadistic cruelty in their approach to people of Gaza.

 

Kevin MacDonald: Oh, yeah!

 

Kevin Barrett: It’s making ethnocentrism look bad. People like you, Kevin, you’re kind of a White, pro-ethnocentric guy. People like Louis Farrakhan a black, pro-ethnocentric guy. And there are various people who are defending various kinds of ethnocentrism. But what Israel is doing right now is really an embarrassment to ethnocentrism, wouldn’t you say?

 

[28:53]

 

Kevin MacDonald: Yeah, I mean, this is extreme ethnocentrism! And it’s what I call hyper-ethnocentrism. And what I would advocate is universal nationalism, that everybody be in their own country and stay there. And that you’d have a sort of ethnic nationalism as a basis of a country.

 

But, you know, that’s a long way off now, given what’s happened in the West. We used to be, you look at movies here, culture from the 1950s, and it’s a White country and proudly. So the same way with the Western European countries. But now it’s just not there. I don’t see how to get it back without a cataclysm.

 

And I think the Left wants a cataclysm because they have purged the military and all that, and they are in charge of legal system, as you can see in the Trump verdict, and we’ll see.

 

But I think we’re headed for a cataclysm or else the West just goes down with a whimper.

 

Kevin Barrett: Yeah, well, my second hour guest today on this radio show is Fadi Lama, who wrote Why the West Can’t Win. And his analysis is that Western central bankers have presided over this expanding Western empire, of course, expanded during the colonial period, and now he thinks they’re going all out for a kind of a global takeover. And he thinks it’s going to fail. And that this nationalist alliance of multipolar nationalist forces led by Iran, Russia and China is likely to prevail over the Western banksters.

 

So if that’s the case, then the world that you want to see, which would be a world of multipolar sovereign nation states where each people is relatively unto itself and free to be itself, and then to deal with other peoples, hopefully in a reasonable manner, unlike what the Israelis are doing right now, that world is coming. But at what cost to the Euro-American countries that are losing the struggle, is the question.

 

Kevin MacDonald: Yeah, absolutely! I’m happy to see this other bloc forming. And Western globalism really means Western hegemony and control over the rest of the world via the economics, the banks and all that.

 

So, yeah, that’s why I favor Russia in the war. And I look favorably on Russia’s ties with Iran and China. And if you’re a country like Iran or Russia or China, you have to know what’s going on in the West. You know that you have this Western elite that really wants to control everything. And this globalist phenomenon is backed by a US military, and it’s not going away.

 

And that’s why Ukraine is seen as an existential issue for both sides. Russia and United States and Western Europe, I think. They see that if the West does not prevail in Ukraine, that Russia will really take off.

 

And I noticed in Georgia, the country of Georgia, they had this law, they just enacted the law, I guess, that prevents these foreign NGO’s from, … They have to register and say how much of the money is coming from the West. And they have to disclose all their sources. Well, this is a big source of the Western power. That’s why Putin clamped down on that. The West is where the money is.

 

So all these NGO’s, they go in there and they propagandise for pro-Western stuff and immigration and all this Leftist stuff and color revolution.

 

[33:27]

 

Kevin Barrett: Don’t forget that. What they want to LGBTQ, all that kind of thing.

 

Kevin MacDonald: Yeah, exactly! It’s going to happen in Ukraine, if Ukraine wins and Russia loses. This is existential! But that’s the danger here, that both sides here see it as existential. Well, then you’re heading for a World War, nuclear war, a disaster for humanity!

 

I mean, I don’t see how this ends now. Biden just allowing Ukraine to strike targets in Russia with American missiles? I mean, this is really serious!

 

Kevin Barrett: That was supposed to be a red line, wasn’t it?

 

Kevin MacDonald: Yeah, that was a red line and not anymore.

 

And so they keep erasing these lines:

 

“Oh, we won’t give them this, won’t give them that!”

 

And they give it to them eventually. And because they do not want to lose this! They realize that sanctions have not worked because of the alliances, really, Iran and China and other countries. India is favorable to them to some extent anyway. And Brazil, other countries like that they just look at where the power is and where it’s going to go.

 

But yeah, they understand that the West is [word unclear] about destroying all their cultures and really all their peoples. And one hodge-podge of humanity. And I just think that would be a disaster!

 

Kevin Barrett: What do you think is the reason that the Western elites are choosing such a seemingly wrong headed strategy from their own point of view? In terms of both, they’re watering down their own cultures and harming their own cultures and their own military capacity through all sorts of policies. The various woke policies and so on.

 

And then rather than a sort of a sensible policy of trying to sort of contain, say, China and then make nice with Russia and Iran while you try to contain China, and then if you ever have to shift a little bit and contain Russia, then you make nice with China a little bit. That kind of sensible strategic policy which characterized the US during the Cold War, to a certain extent, they’ve thrown that away and now they’re trying to go to war against Russia, China and Iran all at once driving them into each other’s arms, even as they tear apart their own societies.

 

It’s almost as if they have some kind of death wish and they want to go down in flames. How do you explain that?

 

[36:08]

 

Kevin MacDonald: Yeah, I’m wondering, … But part of it is, I think, jewish hatred towards the West. You know, they think in terms of what happened in the Middle Ages, they think in terms of the destruction of the temple by the Romans. The pogroms in Russia in the 19th century, as they see them, and of course, in the Holocaust.

 

And it’s like Western culture is to them is absolutely the real [word unclear]. And these people, it’s always the extremists that end up dominating what direction the jewish community goes in.

 

And right now, the extreme ethocentrism is on display! And to some extent, most of it went to Israel. But they’re an awful lot in the United States. And jewish power in the United States, you see now, like, for example, pro-Palestinian protests on universities, they’re getting arrested and all that they would never do that for Black Lives Matter in the same way.

 

And so they’re really clamping down. And anyone who supports the Palestinians, they’re going to have a hard time getting a job on Wall Street or in the media and all that.

 

So, yeah, they have the power right now, and they are using it.

 

Kevin Barrett: And that will provoke a reaction. And we’ve seen throughout history that when jewish communities went too far in their sharp practices towards the majority societies, they suddenly faced a big backlash.

 

Kevin MacDonald: Yeah.

 

Kevin Barrett: And I’m wondering if some of these students are going to suddenly go from being Left-wing, woke pro-Palestine multiculturalists to saying:

 

“You know, I think Kevin MacDonald actually might have a point about the jews.”

 

Kevin MacDonald: Yeah. Yeah, I think that jews have always felt that they can manage, you know, Muslim immigration, Palestinian immigration, all that they had enough power to manage it.

 

And right now they do. I mean, they’re clamping down these protests. But they do see there’s some in Congress now who are pro-Palestinian. And so this policy of letting Muslims come into Europe, say, has backfired for the jews to some extent, a great extent. And you see all these articles about how jews are saying:

 

“Muslims are our allies!”

 

And the [chuckling] question is what are their allies against?

 

And of course, they’re allies against the White majority.

 

But now that’s breaking down. And so many of the immigrants into Europe are Muslim and they really don’t like to choose and they don’t, …

 

[39:03]

 

Kevin Barrett: Quick question. Yeah. I think you’re right that a lot of the Muslim immigrants in Europe are the ones who are supporting the pro-Palestine protests and things like that. But do you think there’s any kind of qualitative difference or meaningful difference between so-called Muslim immigrants in Europe and, let’s say, sub-Saharan Africans from non-Muslim backgrounds, whether Christian, animist or secular, what have you.

 

That is, I found this whole emphasis on the Muslim identity and the Islamic religion to be very deceptive, given that the kinds of problems that immigrants have created in these societies are actually problems that you’re going to see more from the less religious, the more secular elements, whether they’re sub-Saharan African from Christian backgrounds, or whether they’re northern African from Muslim backgrounds. It’s not the religious people that you have to worry about. It’s the non-religious ones.

 

Kevin MacDonald: Well, I don’t know. I think Muslim religion certainly is a big unifying, motivating factor for Muslims.

 

But you talk about sub-Saharan Africa, you know, they’re really talking about a low IQ, criminality prone population that will never really contribute anything to any functioning society.

 

Kevin Barrett: Wait a minute! I played basketball with a bunch of guys from both northern Africa and sub-Saharan Africa when I went to the University of Paris. And there were some very sharp college students from sub-Saharan Africa were playing on that basketball team, actually. So I don’t over generalize to that extent.

 

Kevin MacDonald: Well, there may be some, and there are, but you look at overall the average, and that’s critical, actually! And we see black culture has basically failed in this country despite the fact that there are some intelligent ones. Just look at it and it’s an academic disaster! And I just don’t see it.

 

They’ve tried to improve black academic achievement for decades now, since the sixties, with no success, really. And it’s getting worse. I think there’s actually selection now for that the people having children, … You know, these black women who are going to college and assuming all these high level positions, they’re not having children, very many children at least. Whereas the ghetto moms are having a lot of kids, relatively.

 

Kevin Barrett: Yeah. Well, hasn’t the breakdown of the black family is the biggest reason for all of this.

 

Kevin MacDonald: It’s a huge factor. Yeah, that was an effect of the 1960s. You look at the charts, because I used to teach child psychology every semester I look at these charts in my textbook, and they would be in the 1950s, very strong family structure.

 

And then all of a sudden in the sixties, everybody went south! But blacks much more than anybody else. They were sort of unleashed, you might say, from the social control. We couldn’t just get on welfare so easily. And those single mothers were not really supported that much. You had to have a man around. But not anymore. It hasn’t been that way for a long time! And it’s not changing.

 

[42:31]

 

Kevin Barrett: Religion, again, getting back to that topic, plays a role in this, in that the religious cultures typically put a strong emphasis on these kinds of family values and taboos on sexuality outside of reproductive marriage.

 

And so when that breaks down, then you get a breakdown of the culture and you have a lot of unwed mothers, etcetera. Once again, my argument is that religion is an indispensable part of civilized humanity, that giving it up for transcendent value is really necessary overall. There might be a few people who can do okay without that. But for the culture as a whole, it needs that. It needs to be infused with a traditional way of doing that.

 

Kevin MacDonald: You’re probably right. I think that’s a reasonable thing to say. I think most people seem to need religion for social support and moral compass and sort of meaning to their lives and all that. I agree.

 

Kevin Barrett: Wow! Just like I won an argument with Doctor E. Michael Jones last week. Actually, won an argument with Kevin MacDonald! Again, not too many people can say that. [chuckling]

 

All right, we only have a couple, couple of minutes left here. Well, you know, Kevin, we’re with two minutes left.

 

What can be done to stop this butchery in Gaza?

 

Kevin MacDonald: I just don’t know. Because the Israelis have free reign and they don’t care what anybody else thinks. And the Right militants, settlers, aggressive ones, they’re in charge. And they don’t care what anybody else thinks.

 

And I think they do think that over time it’ll blow over. They’ll do something for the Palestinians, or they’ll let them emigrate or something. The West will give in. Jordan, these other countries will give in, and they’ll let them come in. And they’ll just get rid of them!

 

And then Israeli settlers will set their sights on Jordan, and then they’ll set their sight., … You know, I believe they’re an expansive culture. And Gaza is just part of it. They want that land, and I think there will be jewish settlements back in the Gaza. You know, there were until 2000, was it three or something? When the Israeli army withdrew and all that, to great controversy, at which point they became an open air prison.

 

But yeah, it’s a very expansive, aggressive group, always has been. And we’ll see where it ends. And I think that maybe the rest of the world may start stand up to them at some point.

 

Kevin Barrett: Yeah, well, I think it’s definitely at or even past the point that that needs to start happening.

 

Kevin MacDonald: Yeah, I’d say so!

 

Kevin Barrett: If they really think that we’re going to just roll over and forget all this. Come on, guys. You know, the Nakba* of 1947, 1948 has not been forgotten!

 

[* The Nakba (Arabic: النَّكْبَة an-Nakba, lit. ’the catastrophe’) is the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians through their violent displacement and dispossession of land, property, and belongings, along with the destruction of their society and the suppression of their culture, identity, political rights, and national aspirations. The term is used to describe the events of the 1948 Palestine war as well as the ongoing persecution and displacement of Palestinians by Israel. As a whole, it covers the fracturing of Palestinian society and the long-running rejection of the right of return for Palestinian refugees and their descendants. Source: Wikipedia]

 

And today’s people are telling stories about what happened to their grandparents and great grandparents and they’re keeping that memory alive. And so what’s happening in Gaza now, that memory is going to be kept alive forever and it’s going to come back to bite the perpetrators.

 

Well, thank you so much, Kevin MacDonald. It’s always great to talk with you. A true original thinker and a fearless thinker! Keep up the good work.

 

Take care.

 

Kevin MacDonald: Thank you. Bye.

 

Kevin Barrett: That’s Kevin MacDonald, a fellow academic heretic from the University of Wisconsin. That’s where he went as well as where I got chased out of for talking about 9/11 in the way that certain folks didn’t like.

 

All right, we’ll be back in the next hour, God willing, with Fati Lama talking about why the West can’t win!

 

[46:51]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Website Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/12/2024 = 13)

June 2, 2024 at 4:47 am 
What Kevin Barrett is always up to with his “religion”, which he would prefer to impose on all of humanity as a duty, as if humanity could not decide for itself to remain free of this kind of superstitious restriction. The reclericalization of public space.
In any case, it is more than a mystery to me how someone with his level of education and cultural background can submit to the Abrahamic Stone Age cult “Islam” of all things. It’s downright absurd to the point of grotesque. I don’t dislike the man, but to believe that the whole world needs a “religion” like his is downright presumptuous. Should perhaps over a billion Chinese also become Muslims?
And what does it mean that he had the experience of “getting to know talented black basketball players” during his school days in response to Kevin MacDonald’s statement that it is a risk to allow masses of black Africans into Europe? Doesn’t the man even read Amren or Vdare, for example? Surely he’s not seriously trying to sell us that?
https://archive.org/details/thilo-sarrazin-hostile-takeover-how-islam-hampers-progress-and-corrodes-western-/mode/2up
Reply
3
4 Birhan Dargey 
June 3, 2024 at 5:50 am 
Precisely, why is the West seem to have a deathwiish? well WHO is running the USA/Western powers Foreign Policies and Domestic political/social/EDUCATIONAL/ policies? JEWS..the NONJewish WASP anglo/franco/germanic elites as going along as their PROFITS$$ and interest are favored. Without the nonjews understading that the ultimate Jewish objective is NOT to build multidiverse inclusive tolerant EQUAL (citizenship) societies..JEWS want to use MULTIracial/Diverse societies that WIPE OUT WHITE ANGLO MAJORITY SOCIETIES/COUNTRIES/NATIONS..to buil World JEWISH global Dominance..PD: IF Gaza Falss and Jews insist on expanding into Greater Israel.tehn the West is finished because Greater Israel means one world great ISRAEL…they can NOT achieve that without White/Nonjews/ GENOCIDE 1000XS times more criinal than Gaza…Events in Palestine is juts a preview of Jewish wars/genocide to come…anti white, anti Christian, anti GOYIM.
Reply
5
6 Lynn Ertell 
June 3, 2024 at 5:03 pm 
Follow up studies of the “Kalergi Plan” and the 1970s novel “Campm of the Saints”.
Reply
7
8 Jaime Jonas 
June 3, 2024 at 7:24 pm 
Barret is wrong on his critism of Western Unievrsalist evil colonial past. Western Anglo colonialists entroduced the concepts of CITIZENSHIP, equality unbder the laws, FREDDOMS under Constitutional Liberal DEMOCRACIES. BUT JEWS and ONLY jews claim tha their JEWISH Talmud/Torah/Noahide LAWS are superior to all DEMOCRATIC regimes,,,and that NONjews must accept even forcefully JEWISH Global Tyrannical THEOCRACY…which put JEWS at teh vey top of the POLITICAL/social/Cultural order…
Reply
===============

 

RUMBLE COMMENTS
Kevin MacDonald on “Extreme Hyper-Ethnocentrism of Jews (re: Gaza)”
FFWN
1.69K followers
Follow
32
0
Comments
Share
Save
Embed
11 days ago
3.71K Podcasts Conspiracies
Evolutionary psychology scholar Kevin MacDonald discussers his new article “The Extreme Hyper-Ethnocentrism of Jews on Display in Israeli Attitudes Toward the Gaza War.”
9 Comments
Sort by likes
Sort by newest

0/2000
Comment
CelticRomanSoldier
1 week ago
I am quite pleased that Ireland, Norway and Spain have recognized Palestine as a State, a gradual procession to an international consensus to isolate and condemn the Jewish State. I can only hope that an International Military force will invade and occupy Israel, arrest and try the criminal murder gang that runs that rogue State and siezes their illegal nuclear arsenal.




2 likes 
Reply
Grellen
1 week ago
It is sad to see that Professor MacDonald has not aged well.




1 like 
Reply
StLonginus
1 week ago
MacDonald cannot bring himself to talk about Christianity; Catholicism, which WAS “Western” culture for over one thousand years. And then the Church collapsed after infiltration.




1 like 
Reply
Sasapienza
1 week ago
Thanks for your honest, real Abrahamic religious opinion. Refreshing in this sterile, west, cuckoo cage.




0 likes 
Reply
ResistEvolve
1 week ago
Some Zionist icon I think it was David Ben-Gurion said (paraphrased), “the old will die and the young will forget.” I’m not so sure about that!




0 likes 
Reply
daftdude
1 week ago
Israel sells US secret military tech to China. This makes supporting Israel an act of treason.
All zionists are traitors, and should get punished for their treason with capital punishment in order to dissuade further corruption and treason for the benefit of Israel at the expense of the safety of Americans and Europeans.

The selling of secret US Military tech to China by Israel is going on for decades now, and NOBODY does anything about it.

“Report: Israel Passes U.S. Military Technology to China”
https://www.military.com/defensetech/2013/12/24/report-israel-passes-u-s-military-technology-to-china
https://archive.vn/ZzbpI

Documentary about how Israel has been selling US secret military tech to China and still is:

The Parasite, How Israel sells US tech to America’s enemies

“How Israel betrays US”

“Israel and China a ‘Marriage Made in Heaven,’ Says Netanyahu”
https://thediplomat.com/2017/03/israel-and-china-a-marriage-made-in-heaven-says-netanyahu/
https://archive.vn/CFx1Z

“Former CIA Phil Giraldi: “Israel Steals US Technology””

Former CIA Phil Giraldi: “Israel Steals US Technology”

https://archive.vn/hPBmk

The NSA sends all its raw data to Israel, including information pertaining to Americans worldwide including those living in America:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/11/nsa-americans-personal-data-israel-documents
https://archive.vn/Qn0P5

Jewish Orthodox woman is the head of the NSA cyber security section:
https://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/Orthodox-woman-from-Baltimore-to-head-NSAs-new-cybersecurity-section-596757
https://archive.vn/c1xkC

Watch the video included in this gab post:
https://gab.com/KennyLiquorbush/posts/108690546456863184
“Zionism is NOT about a “homeland for Jews” – it’s about establishing a One World Government, where the Jews tyrannically rule the goyim.”




0 likes 
Reply
CelticRomanSoldier
1 week ago
Mid West left wing extremist turned professor and muslim.




-2 likes 
Reply
‹ Hide 1 reply
Grellen
1 week ago
I don’t believe that you are an so – called “Celtic Roman Soldier.” (sic). I think that you are an filthy jew. The Irish Parliament (otherwise the “Oireachtas”), has voted to recognize the State of Palestine. Most of the countries which currently exist on the surface of this planet recognize the State of Palestine. With the usual exceptions.




1 like 
Reply
‹ Hide 1 reply
CelticRomanSoldier
1 week ago
Your allegation is way off the mark. I must remind you that Eamon de Valera first President of the Irish Republic was a Jew. (Spanish Diaspora)
As for me, I was educated by Franciscans, baptised and Confirmed Catholic.




-1 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett at The Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — Transcript

Patriotic Weekly Review – with Blair Cottrell – Dec 4, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Dangerfield – Talking Tough with Mark Collett – Mar 28, 2020 — Transcript

Mark Collett – Sam Melia Sentencing – with Laura Towler – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

Joe Marsh – Sam Melia Going into Court Before He was Sentenced – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

 

911 – The Jews Had Me Fooled: A Jewish Engineered Pearl Harbor

Organized jewry Did 9/11

Organized jewry Did 9/11 — The 16th Anniversary, 2017

Know More News — Christopher Bollyn, The Man Who Solved 9/11 — TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report with Christopher Bollyn – Sep 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Guns and Butter interviews Christopher Bollyn — The War on Terror – Dec 18, 2019 — Transcript

AE911Truth – Exposing Those Who Covered up the Crime of the Century – May 28, 2023 – Transcript

 

============================================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 6,713

• Total words in post = 8,263
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

 

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2: Thu, Jun 13, 2024 — Transcript fully proofed.

Version 1: Wed, Jun 12, 2024 — Published post.  25/45 mins fully proofed. Includes Website comments (13).

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/3/2024 = )

Long Knife
22 hours ago
“They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.”

3
0

@danadlington
12 hours ago(edited)
If you consider international law the contents of this video could be interpreted as an Act of War against the White Race. This goes beyond racism. Also as time goes on and it’s more and more evident we have no political representation. Based off available evidence I don’t believe there’s a political solution to this problem as it’s built into society so deeply. The question is how quickly can the normies wake up and will the Genocide plan be into it’s final phase for any meaningful action to be taken?

2
0
Hide replies

@L
11 hours ago
get comfortable with the idea that a resolution will not come in your lifetime, nor mine or likely not for possibly a few centuries. How we got here didn’t happen overnight, and won’t be fixed that quickly either. know this and embrace it, dedicate your life to your people and work on things that will help other whites survive. eventually all empires collapse, though the technological aspect will possibly draw that out longer than it otherwise would take. think of your ancestors, every white person alive today is here BECAUSE their ancestors survived extraordinarily difficult times. This is a huge task in front of us, but it’s also part of nature’s way of correcting things ; only the most well equipped will get to pass on genetics and through that the future generations will be better and stronger, with the hope that they recognize the mistakes and not let it happen again.

2
0
Hide replies

@Pandemonium
2 hours ago
Your position presupposes a continuation of the status quo. Societal trajectories can be rapidly changed through the insertion of destabilising variables and which cascade into unstoppable forces. This is where accelerationism needs to be embraced by WN, instead of defaulting to the “two more weeks” cope strategy and the “we need more time to prepare” fear response. The more I see of how WNs are operating, individualistic within their splintered groups the more apparent it is that we need a unifying set of rules to steer our efforts. Just like the Jews have done using their Talmud and texts like Rules for Radicals and the Frankfurt School doctrines.

1
0

@pius.hermit
13 hours ago(edited)
The only society, that would be able to survive, would abort jews postnatal. And choose the postnatal abortion for whamen, that are not willing to get children, or are to old for this, even if they have given birth before.

2
0

@Alison-Chains
18 hours ago
I just saw this on Weston’s show. we all need to share this

1
0
The worst
18 hours ago
agree with this video

1
0
By Their Works
20 minutes ago
One angle that i didn’t even know worked on me until i was embarassingly old is that “overpopulation” is destroying the environment. Of course this is pushed in White nations to White kids, not in the nations that can’t feed themselves, and are actually overpopulated. Whites are the one who /should/ be breeding. We are the ones who will invent and improve the technology to restore a healthy balance with nature. Whites have to stop funding the growth of non-White populations and remove non-Whites from all of our nations. Nature devised us to outcompete obsolete subspecies. We must purge the poisonous parasites and realize our potential.

@Pandemonium
2 hours ago
These videos are well researched but always fall short for mass distribution. Terrible “AI” voice overs and questionable imagery will not see widespread distribution of this information into the “normie” sphere. It is also amazing that despite all of this information that no motive or understanding of central drivers are discussed, which is not only CRITICAL for normies to understand WHY,HOW and WHO but to ACCEPT it as fact. This is where the work of people like Adam Green discussing Edom is paramount and further to this is the nature of PARASITES, that is there is no VALUE CREATION occurring to “progress” society. I commend the time and effort to make this video but it needs more work to break through to the masses.

1
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett at The Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — Transcript

Patriotic Weekly Review – with Blair Cottrell – Dec 4, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Dangerfield – Talking Tough with Mark Collett – Mar 28, 2020 — Transcript

Mark Collett – Sam Melia Sentencing – with Laura Towler – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

Joe Marsh – Sam Melia Going into Court Before He was Sentenced – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

 

911 – The Jews Had Me Fooled: A Jewish Engineered Pearl Harbor

Organized jewry Did 9/11

Organized jewry Did 9/11 — The 16th Anniversary, 2017

Know More News — Christopher Bollyn, The Man Who Solved 9/11 — TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report with Christopher Bollyn – Sep 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Guns and Butter interviews Christopher Bollyn — The War on Terror – Dec 18, 2019 — Transcript

AE911Truth – Exposing Those Who Covered up the Crime of the Century – May 28, 2023 – Transcript

 

============================================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 4,620

• Total words in post = 6,822
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

 

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Mon, Jun 3, 2024 — Published post. Includes Odysee comments ().

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 5/3/2024 = 33)

@joachimvk5692
4 days ago
Great speech
11

@bally1213
3 days ago
Now that is some lady, not a single thing could anyone disagree with, unless you’re an import of course . I’m with you all the way, I hope all the right people are appreciating your efforts of bringing the truth. Thank you 󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
4

@jamespalmer6048
3 days ago
God Bless You
3

@ashm.5899
15 hours ago
Eva speaks the truth! Love her!
1

@kingalfredWA
2 days ago
30 million views
bravo Eva!
2

@PS-js9bj
23 hours ago
May God bless her, and her Guardian Angel take extra special care of her!

@TeamTrumpCGN
1 day ago
Truth. Thanks, Eva. WWG1WGA

@Coasterr200145
2 days ago
I agree with this woman 100%.

@bayouelton
3 days ago
God Bless that young woman. I hope she becomes the New Greta.
1

@Eiseman-1-
7 hours ago
Believe whatever you want but people were segregated for a reason.
1

@edhavnfun
1 day ago
As an Alabama , U.S.A. man, I am very proud to hear such a speech. I am in complete agreement with every thing you said. I am ready to die for my country. We are all i a revolution and if it takes it, we will fight.
A great civilization is conquered within before it is conquered without. Maga Maga Maga.
2

1 reply

@jonseidman1
1 day ago
Beautifully said! Even some of us in San Francisco feel the same way!
1

@1DougBeard
23 hours ago
She nailed it

@adamw116
3 days ago (edited)
Youtube is probably supressing the number of views
, 880 my ass!!! This should go SUPER VIRAL!!!
2

3 replies

@Arthera0
21 hours ago
they are. she even got a strike for hate speech. which is absurd

@WhyAreTheyOverHere
21 hours ago
Of course, the comments are disappearing down the NYC rathole quickly.

@adamw116
17 hours ago

@Arthera0 Distgusting if that algorithm was a person I don’t want to say what I’d want to do!

@grazzitdvram
23 hours ago (edited)
words words words, pretty words but just words and words are just wind without actions.

@theroofsedge
1 day ago (edited)
6:30 Did you say Europe will DIE-first or DIE-verse?

@captainmzungu2505
2 days ago
An Eva-future versus a Greta-future.
I know what I’ll choose

@theroofsedge
1 day ago
0:10 What happened when the social-scientists afffericaneyezed the wonderfully gentle European honey bee? 2:12

@BaltimoresBerzerker
7 hours ago
14

@Martin-iq8id
17 hours ago
Remigration
2

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett at The Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — Transcript

Patriotic Weekly Review – with Blair Cottrell – Dec 4, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Dangerfield – Talking Tough with Mark Collett – Mar 28, 2020 — Transcript

Mark Collett – Sam Melia Sentencing – with Laura Towler – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

Joe Marsh – Sam Melia Going into Court Before He was Sentenced – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

 

Luke Ford – Andrew Joyce On The Jewish Question — Apr 17, 2017 — Transcript

David Duke Interviews Dr Andrew Joyce — TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice Radio: Dr Andrew Joyce – The History of Jewish Influence — TRANSCRIPT (Part 1)

Red Ice Radio: Dr Andrew Joyce – The History of Jewish Influence — TRANSCRIPT (Part 2)

 

 

TOO – Andrew Joyce’s Podcast – Talmud and Taboo — Part 01 – Jun 30, 2020 — Transcript

Andrew Joyce’s Podcast – T & T No. 1 – The Skype Directory — Jul 15, 2020 — Transcript

Andrew Joyce – T&T No 2 – And then one day… – Jul 20, 2020 — Transcript

Andrew Joyce – T&T No 3 – Kicking Over the Bucket – Jul 27, 2020 — Transcript

Andrew Joyce – T&T 4 – The Man Who Put the Jews on Trial – Aug 3, 2020

Andrew Joyce – T&T 5 – The Return of the Bucket – Aug 5, 2020 — Transcript

Andrew Joyce – T&T 6 – The Antisemite’s Handbook – Aug 11, 2020 — Transcript

Andrew Joyce – T&T 7 – The TOO Takedown – Aug 14, 2020 — Transcript

Andrew Joyce – T&T 8 – SEMITISM – Aug 28, 2020 — Transcript

Andrew Joyce – Trumpism, Bidenism, and the System – Nov 9, 2020 — Transcript

Guide to Kulchur – The Protocols of the Elders of Zion – Andrew Joyce – Nov 22, 2020 — Transcript

 

 

Andrew Joyce – BLM – Irish Edition – Dec 31, 2020 – Transcript

Horus – Discussing the ‘Russian Pogroms’ with Andrew Joyce – Jan 20, 2021 — Transcript

Guide to Kulchur – The Merchant of Venice – Abusive Victim-Identity Syndrome – Andrew Joyce – Jan 20, 2021 — Transcript

 

 

 

911 – The Jews Had Me Fooled: A Jewish Engineered Pearl Harbor

Organized jewry Did 9/11

Organized jewry Did 9/11 — The 16th Anniversary, 2017

Know More News — Christopher Bollyn, The Man Who Solved 9/11 — TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report with Christopher Bollyn – Sep 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Guns and Butter interviews Christopher Bollyn — The War on Terror – Dec 18, 2019 — Transcript

AE911Truth – Exposing Those Who Covered up the Crime of the Century – May 28, 2023 – Transcript

 

============================================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 1,562

• Total words in post = xxx
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

 

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Fri, May 3, 2024 — Published post. Includes Odysee comments (33).

David Kurten: Welcome back to the David Kurten Show here on Today’s News Talk, TNT. And it is fantastic to have back on the show Mads Palsvig, who is the leader of the Prosperity Party in Denmark. Mads, welcome back to the show.

 

Mads Palsvig: Thanks, David. Good to see you again.

 

David Kurten: Yeah, really good to see you again. Now I want to talk to you about some, you know, the general issues that you write about and speak about on X [formerly Twitter] and on social media, as well as leading the party in Denmark. And that relates to something that happened in the news in the UK yesterday. There was an incident at Manchester Airport where a couple of Israelis were stopped, you know, in a routine check. They were held for a couple of hours and then let into the country.

 

But there was a complete outpouring of the narrative that these people have been treated badly. They’ve been treated with “anti-semitism” because they come from Israel. But if someone came from Russia or Afghanistan and they were given the same treatment, no one would bat an eyelid.

 

And do you think that the narrative of anti-semitism is talked up more than you know, that actually there is anti-semitism in existence in the West?

 

Mads Palsvig: Oh, for sure, yeah. I mean, leading jewish scholars admit openly that it’s a tool they use to get sympathy. And they’re very successful in this. They managed to take over literally every institution in America. 85% of the Biden administration is jewish!

 

So they are very successful.

 

And you mentioned Russia. Now, my wife is Russian-jewish, so I’m of course knowledgeable about what’s going on there.

 

And if you talk about “anti-Russianism”, if such a word exists, most people are not aware that Russian people were collectively punished for Putin’s Special Military Operation in Ukraine by having all their assets frozen overnight. They didn’t even get 24 hours to transfer their money to Dubai or elsewhere. They just had all their assets frozen.

 

So you have collective punishments of all Russians. I cannot send a package to my mother-in-law. I cannot send money to my mother-in-law. I cannot travel directly to my mother-in-law. I have to spend 1,000 Euros to travel through Istanbul or Dubai to visit my mother-in-law, who is old, who is fragile, who is in hospital on and off. And this is collective punishment, but this is just Russians!

 

And then if you are reading the Talmud, then you would see that they write that a jew is worth 10,000 non-jewish! And a jew should have 2, 800 non-jewish slaves! These are not my words. These are written in the Talmud.

 

[02:55]

 

And I believe that some of the jews in Hollywood and some of the jews in the US administration are clearly Talmud followers, because the chutzpah to think that you are entitled to 85% of the good jobs. And that goes for not only the Biden administration, that goes for all the leading jobs on us universities, all the social engineering, the woke culture that is happening there, the anti-Christian and the hostility towards Christian people. Hollywood is also 85% Talmud followers. And it’s nonstop White guilt, social engineering, hate towards White people:

 

“Just open your borders. We need to get rid of the White people!”

 

And they literally, you can find so many examples of leading scholars, writers, politicians in the Knesset, talking openly about, you know, not only genociding the Amalek, they call the Palestinians, but actually all White people!

 

So I think it’s about time that all jewish people, all the good jewish people, and I know a lot of them, when you have a jewish wife, you get a lot of jewish friends. I love them! And I need more jewish people now to go out and say:

 

“Excuse me, maybe if we only 2% of them are America, maybe we shouldn’t have more than four to 5%, at most, of the leading post in the society?”

 

Because who’s talking about the diversity? It’s the jews who are talking about the diversity! It’s the jews who are using this tool of calling diversity by shaming and White guilt tripping the White people. Because we’re all behind the Holocaust! All of us! Not only some psychopathic Nazis, who wanted to loot jewish wealth, but all White people have to pay.

 

So you can have, … Well Americans don’t have free healthcare. If a jew is sick in America, they have free healthcare, even including organ transplantations.

 

So there is a rule for thee and the rule for the other people. And this is based on this philosophy of “collective punishment” that is inherent in the Talmud. This Amalek “kill all of them”. So if one Muslim commits a crime against a jew, then kill all of them! This is collective punishment. This is not Christian.

 

In Christianity, we have an eye for an eye, which means if someone is committing a crime, you can go for one person and only him. You cannot kill his wife and children! It’s not a Christian thing to do. And I would like to see a more Christian world order in the Christian societies, and a Muslim and a Hindu and a Buddhist in their societies, of course.

 

I’m not saying Christians should be running the whole show. I’m just saying in the Christian countries, I would like to see a Christian world order of love, of forgiveness, of all men are created equal, and never collective punishment, only the perpetrator.

 

And what we’re seeing is we’re having a Talmudian world order right now perpetrated by the 85% in the Biden administration, and that is hate! That is revenge! That is racial supremacy! That the only genocide we are allowed to hear about is crimes committed against jewish people.

 

[06:24]

 

The 50 to 100 million Russian, mainly Orthodox Christians that were murdered, we’re not allowed to talk about! Any other genocide it’s not important! Because there is a racial supremacy inherent in the Talmud!

 

And I would like to see all my jewish friends who might watch this and any other jewish person, who are lovely people, and I love jewish people. They’re bright, they’re fun to be with, they’re great people. But please, come on, now!

 

I mean, if you’re promoting diversity, then try to be a little bit diverse. Allow some Hindus, some Buddhists, and Muslims and Christians to be allowed to make some movies and run Wall Street, run the universities, get an occasional seat in the Congress and the Biden administration.

 

David Kurten: That is an absolutely extraordinary figure! 85% of the Biden administration being jewish. I didn’t know it was that high, being a Christian myself. And I say the majority of people in the United States, which obviously is the most powerful country in the West, would say they’re Christian.

 

But I think there is a very big blind spot here, because a lot of Christians would support jews because they think of themselves as living in a judeo-Christian culture, and think that Judaism is just, well, the Bible without the New Testament, it’s just the Old Testament.

 

And a lot of Christians have never even heard of the Talmud.

 

I mean, I myself, I’d never heard of the Talmud until three or four years ago. I wasn’t even aware of his existence. And I’ve now come to understand some of the things that are in it, and it’s absolutely horrific!

 

And it means that if you follow the Talmud, which was written in the first of the fourth century AD as a rejection of Christ, Christ is the fulfillment of the Old Testament.

 

And a lot of jews are Christians. There are messianic jews who follow Christ, have gone that way, but there are some who follow the Talmud. And it’s a horrific book, isn’t it?

 

And I think everyone should be aware of what’s in there. And you’ve put that very well and succinctly how that book is now having an incredible influence over Christian nations.

 

Mads Palsvig: Yeah, I mean the reason that you and I probably were not aware of that until, in my case, also three, four years ago, is because there’s a death penalty for a jew to tell a non-jew about the Talmud. They know that it’s not good.

 

And in the Talmud, they also write that you are free to commit any crime against non-jewish people, even on the annual Purim*. To take part in the annual Purim. I just posted a video of how they have kids dress up as Arabs and jews.

 

[09:21]

 

And then in the Purim, the kids in the schools are play killing the Arabs. I’m not kidding! It’s happening. This is what they do. And on the Purim, they have to go in, if they take part in that. I’m not saying in all synagogues, not in all synagogues, but in certain synagogues they have, when they take part in the Purim, in the ritual, annual ritual, they have to promise to break all promises to non-jews in the following twelve months. And that’s totally fine! I mean, come on now! That’s enough!

 

And there are so many assimilated, or whether there are religious or non-religious jewish people out there. I think, you know, you had a good run. We all love you. We’re not going to collectively punish you, all of you, for what some evil jewish people have done of crimes. We are Christian people. We will only go for those who actually committed a crime. We’re not going to go after his wife or his kids. This is not a Christian thing to do.

 

And then I have another thing I would like to say is the Germans have now been punished for 80 years.

 

I mean, can you find an inch, an ounce of forgiveness in your heart? Isn’t this enough? Isn’t it enough now!

 

The latest gimmick they now have found out is that now they have to be ritualistically humiliated during the European football championship. And the German men are forced to play in pink! Come on!

 

David Kurten: No! I didn’t know that. That’s terrible, isn’t it?

 

Mads Palsvig: It is so in your face! We own you!

 

Come on, that’s not good. We are nice people. And the jews people are nice, but we are all nice people. We should get along.

 

And the thing is, the minute Germany get their freedom again, then Germany and Russia will find out that they could benefit each other with Russian energy, German ingenuity, and we would have freedom, democracy and prosperity beyond belief!

 

If only we are allowed to not be socially engineered into hating each other and fighting all these ridiculous wars that already cost at least half a million young men their lives in Ukraine. It’s horrible!

 

David Kurten: Yeah, well, it goes back a long way, doesn’t it? I think we’ve had the World Wars of the last century.

 

But I think the greatest tragedy, or tragedies, of the last century is that there was enmity created between England or Britain and Germany and Russia and Germany and America and Germany, and now America and Russia and Britain and Russia. And we have four great Christian nations here. If we all got along and helped each other and supported each other and worked for creating prosperity and building a Christian society in a Christian world, how incredible would the world be? But this continual enmity being stirred up, and I speak against it. You speak against it.

 

[12:35]

 

I mean, look at the Russophobia in all of the mainstream media all over the West because of what’s going on in Ukraine. And you just think that this is perpetuating the tragedy and perpetuating something that is desperately wrong here, when we should all stop fighting against each other and start being friends again.

 

Mads Palsvig: I totally agree. And if I can add, this fight against Russians, it’s again a sanction against human beings of flesh and blood with a beating heart. It’s against the Russian people.

 

And also all us non-Russians who have friends and family we love in Russia. It’s not against the corporations. 97% of all western corporations who were there in March 2022 are still there. You can buy everything there! I was there last year visiting my Russian family, and everything is there. And the standard of living is just going one way. The sanctions are not working. The Russian people are hardworking. They don’t understand this hate. They’re very serious people. They’re ready to fight. They don’t want to fight.

 

But if you want to fight, they will hit back! And I have no shadow of doubt. If there is a war, they will win it. And I try very hard to show a third way. So you have, like, you have one way. You are either pro-China and Russia or you’re pro-NATO.

 

But I would like to say there’s actually another way. That is, there are some people who are running both, who are trying to stir up the beans and get both sides to fight each other.

 

And I think it goes back a long way. If you read books by Golitsyn and Bezmanov, they suggest that it was actually engineered in the Soviet Union back in the sixties. All the social engineering in the West, the youth revolution, the feminism, the attack on Christianity, was all engineered in the atheistic communist Soviet Union back in the sixties. These are first hand witnesses who were present in the meetings who say that.

 

And you can see it might have happened by other means, but there were definitely a motive. And they tried to do it and they’ve succeeded in doing it.

 

So that’s the third way I’m trying to say is that someone is trying to infiltrate and destroy our Christian nations and they’re trying to make us fight with Russia and China.

 

David Kurten: Yeah, well, I mean, I absolutely agree with you because, you know, looking back in history, you know, just very briefly, there was this hideous revolution in 1917. The Royal Romanov family was executed by, you know, Bolsheviks, and most of the Bolsheviks were jewish, Talmudist jewish people. And then revolution didn’t happen and take off in the West, so cultural Marxism was developed. You know, that goes back from the sixties, and then it also goes back to the Frankfurt School in the 1920s as well.

 

[15:35]

 

And one of the people involved in the Comintern at the time was Willi Münzenberg, who is reported to have said:

 

“We will make Western civilisation stink! We will change and undermine all it’s values and make life impossible!”

 

So that’s really horrible! It’s quite satanic! You’ve got these people who actually genuinely wanted to do that.

 

But Mads, I totally agree with you on all of these things. I wish we could talk for much longer because we’ve just touched the surface on this issue. And, you know what you’re saying about feminism being created. I mean, this is a cultural Marxist ideology where women are seen to be oppressed and they need to “rise up and smash the Patriarchy”.

 

And then you have homophobia and trans-phobia where the LGBTs are created as a group, and then they need to rise up and smash hetero-normativity and undermine Christian values, and so on.

 

So this is going on in multiple different parts of society and we can see it.

 

But anyway, Mads, thank you so much for joining me on the show today, and I really wish you well and the best with your Prosperity Party in Denmark. I hope one day we can be in the places of power and we can turn things around and we can get things back to normal.

 

Mads Palsvig, thank you for joining me here on Today’s News Talk, TNT.

 

[16:59]

 

[END]

 

[* Purim: A Festival of Hate and an Insight into How Jewish Supremacists view Gentiles
March 14, 2014 at 12:10 am

 

Purim: A Festival of Hate and an Insight into How Jewish Supremacists view Gentiles

 

By David Duke. As the Jewish celebration of Purim starts on March 15, it is timely to ask what is Purim, why is it celebrated and what does it mean? The answers to these questions are shocking–and always covered up by the Jewish-Supremacist controlled mass media.

 

It is vital that non-Jews acquire a fundamental understanding of the unconscionable hatred engendered by this primitive Jewish celebration of atavistic hatred, murder and revenge against their enemies, a feast called “Purim”.

 

According to the Jewish religion, Purim means “Feast of Lots” which comes from the Jewish contention that Haman, who was the Prime Minister to the King of Persia, Xerxes (the Jews call him Ahasuerus), planned to kill all the Jews in the empire.

 

Xerxes’ wife was the Jewish Esther and she with the Jewish leader Mordechai interceded with the King, to have Haman executed and allow the Jews to exact revenge upon those they saw as their enemies.

 

There is no archeological or historical evidence for any of this other than the bloodthirsty writings in Esther and it’s admittedly Jewish version of the events. The book of Esther records that Haman along with all of his ten sons were hanged, and that 75,000 Persians were slaughtered by the Jews.

 

Interestingly enough, the Jews used Jewish influence (that of Esther) over a Gentile king to do their dirty work. In one instance, the book of Esther even frankly tells how the King was fooled into believing wrongly that Haman had cut down his beloved grove of trees.

 

Esther explains that Haman did not do this but the angels did it and appeared to the keepers of the trees as Haman.

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Youtube Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/29/2024 = 76)

@ChefEarthenware
1 day ago
Excellent guest.
21

@MrSillenomis
1 day ago
Hats off again to David for a great interview providing brave clarity on these issues
17

@TheGreatestLieEverTold
1 day ago
God bless you David for doing this and thank you.
9

@allenniumfalcon
1 day ago
Bang on.
14

@sipocharles9180
13 hours ago
For years, I have questioned the statistical absurdity of Jews having a global monopoly on business, banking, and economics, which by extension means the world, but representing only 0.2% of the world’s 8 billion people.
Mr. Palsvig echoes this sentiment and articulates it excellently, aiming at problem root causes, so I look forward to hearing from him more.
Well done, David. I applaud your courage in tackling this sensitive topic.
14

1 reply

@romeisfallingagain
4 hours ago
a racket of blackmail, extortion and payoffs
1

@clivejohnston9894
1 day ago
Massive fan David – this guy is kicking ass 󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
5

@DavidUK64
13 hours ago
Great job David and Mads!!
3

@martingodden613
7 hours ago
my lovely wife is Russian.She is unable to transfer her Russian pension home to the UK.Something she worked hard for many years to receive.Collective punishment indeed.
2

@ChrisLipthorpe
22 hours ago
I met Mads at an Ian R Crane AV conference in 2018. We need more politicians like him.
9

@davestevenson9080
1 day ago
Fantastic push of the overton window there david. I don’t really believe there is a political solution but if heritage run in my area i’ll give them a vote
27

1 reply

@romeisfallingagain
4 hours ago
you are wise to know the solution isnt political, its theological
1

@a.j.b.8658
8 hours ago
I hope you can turn things around too, David! I’d be proud to vote for you.
1

@bertibear1300
1 day ago
Good show.
6

@mattfm101
5 hours ago
David knows how to touch on this subject without ever touching on it, it’s beyond words how impressive how he does it.
2

@Thecountofstgermaine
1 day ago (edited)
Well done david you keep blowing me away with your guests, im a deep researcher into jewish malfeasance glad youve got the cojones to go there may god be with you always.
EDIT:if anyone needs documentaries or sources ill be glad to help
21

David Kurten
·
1 reply

@davidkurten1
1 day ago
Thank you
3

@astroterf.
4 hours ago (edited)
Absolutely fantastic interview, thank you!
People have been encouraged and conditioned to be horrified by the Qur’an and Muslims while the (much worse) Talmud is kept quiet and if you talk about how much more appalling it is you’re ‘anti-Semitic’ – all by design!
3

@gillps5130
1 day ago (edited)
Kim Iversen very recently, now this. At long last. Europa the Last Battle and ‘The World Conquerors’, Louis Marschalko fills much else in. I’m glad you mentioned the Frankfurt School, David, which was in danger of being left out.
16

@GhostfaceAB
12 hours ago
Well said
2

@fredfredericks3496
1 day ago
There goes your YouTube channel, David. At least I’ve got the TNT app lol
5

@romeisfallingagain
4 hours ago
i have been informing people for years. was banned from facebook for it for 5 years. now its meainstream
4

3 replies

@astroterf.
4 hours ago
You and me both!
2

@romeisfallingagain
4 hours ago
@astroterf. to the end, brother
2

@astroterf.
4 hours ago
@romeisfallingagain
2

@rl53
6 hours ago
Lebor Glas Clann is a good read David for an alternative history of ideologies & how they came about.

@dd7521
15 hours ago
Free health care?
3

@kronos77
1 day ago
What was he saying about free health care for Jews in America? I dont get it.
6

2 replies

@lilleypops1868
13 hours ago
Apparently the US is paying for the health care in Israel and if they need to go abroad for treatment that’s paid for too. As for organ donation I believe they can accept organs but cannot donate organs themselves. I don’t know how true this is.
4

@romeisfallingagain
3 hours ago
wait til you find out about their mortgages/loan arrangement lol “heter iska” lol

@earthstick
1 day ago (edited)
I’m not sure that the accusation of anti-semitism is talked up, and I am not sure it is wrong either. If I was a Jew who follows the Talmud, then it follows that I would think differently. But I am not. So it seems to come down to this: Some groups, be they racial, national, religious, will put people of their group before people outside their group. And it seems that either Christians never did that, or it has been lost. Christ said anyone can be saved, so long as they follow him, so it is primarily a religious group. But if this group does not put its members before those outside the group, then there is nothing really to it, and its own destruction is inevitable. So how does it avoid being a weak group?
5

9 replies

@gillps5130
1 day ago
A really good question. The nature of Christianity virtually prohibits exclusivity. It wasn’t always so, crusades, missionary work etc but we have evolved away from it while others haven’t.
2

@earthstick
1 day ago
@gillps5130 That’s it, exclusivity. It appears to be the anathema of modern Christian nations. But a group exists because there is condition that divides the whole into those inside and those outside the group. Without that condition there is no group, nothing to be within. That condition is critical, it must be studied, understood, and enforced.

@earthstick
1 day ago
@gillps5130 It’s more than just that though. Is it true that the Pope blessed weapons in WWI? Because Jesus being a peaceful man, objected to that. And it seems if the Pope did infact bless weapons/support WWI, then we can see a clear contradiction that had such consequences that I dare say it has greatly damaged Christian faith. But that begs the question of how do we overcome the violent people. You mention the crusades, a bloody period in Christain history and a rude contradiction. But nobody cared about that until now.
1

@earthstick
1 day ago
@gillps5130 The recent chemical attacker migrant was accepted into the Christian faith, yet had a Muslim funeral. This question of exclusivity is central.
1

@ayyleeuz4892
23 hours ago
all ethnic groups have positive and negative ethnocentrism, each to varying degrees. Christianity is a religion, and it is universalist.

@gillps5130
13 hours ago
I’ve tried to reply twice but each time they have been deleted.

@ayyleeuz4892
13 hours ago
@gillps5130 you must write as if you are talking to an extremely politically correct person whom you do not want to upset

@earthstick
10 hours ago
@ayyleeuz4892 But it still has conditions before someone can be regarded a Christian. If there is no condition then it cannot categorise, and thus does not exist.

@ayyleeuz4892
9 hours ago
@earthstick I don’t know what you’re referring to. you mentioned noticing in group cooperation between Jews. I explain that Christianity is a universalist religion, whereas Judaism has a “law of matrilineal descent” so only people whose mothers were Jews are Jews, and so their ethnocentrism is expressed quite apparently in the world.

@shrunkensimon
10 hours ago
I’d be very careful that you actually understand the full history before giving energy to something that may end up causing a future mass horror – are you certain you’re pinning the tail on the donkey.
Bare in mind you may be seeing what someone wants you to see, so they can remain out of sight while another party takes the flack.

3 replies

@romeisfallingagain
4 hours ago
no, its called indepth study. everything said is correct. you just didnt get taught the history or theology by the controllers of the system
1

@romeisfallingagain
4 hours ago
@shrunkensimon rothschild isnt the beginning of this. the talmud is, and its teaching. i have hundreds of books which cover the topic at hand. stop coping
1

@shrunkensimon
3 hours ago
@romeisfallingagain Do you understand world history? The last 2000 years are about Rome, not Judaism.

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett at The Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — Transcript

Patriotic Weekly Review – with Blair Cottrell – Dec 4, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Dangerfield – Talking Tough with Mark Collett – Mar 28, 2020 — Transcript

Mark Collett – Sam Melia Sentencing – with Laura Towler – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

Joe Marsh – Sam Melia Going into Court Before He was Sentenced – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

 

============================================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 2,716

• Total words in post = xxx
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

 

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Fri, Mar 29, 2024 — Published post. Includes Youtube comments (76).

Alex Jones: So your husband, Samuel Melia, is literally a thought criminal out of 1984. This precedent is so dangerous! And that’s exactly why it’s not getting any media coverage, is they want to quietly just put us in their modern gulags.

 

Laura Towler: But basically, Sam was convicted. It’s a very strange crime, but he was convicted for his “intentions” behind publishing these stickers.

 

So the prosecution said:

 

“Every single sticker is legal.”

 

So the messages on all the stickers are legal. They also said that:

 

“The truth is no defense in court.”

 

So if you can prove that all of the stickers are true, that doesn’t matter.

 

And they also said, the third thing, is that there’s no evidence of any crimes or any racial hatred being stirred up because of these stickers. He was literally convicted for his “intentions”, his “thoughts” behind publishing these stickers.

 

And what they did was they took things from our house and they went through tens of thousands of private messages of Sam and tried to build up a profile of him and then presented that in court and said:

 

“This guy is a really bad guy! He needs to go to prison.”

 

Alex Jones: Laura Towler is Sam Melia’s wife over in the UK, just sentenced to two years in prison over anti-immigration stickers, and a mom to a two year old girl with another baby on the way in six weeks.

 

She’s also the deputy leader of Patriotic Alternative, which is Britain’s largest and most active nationalist organisation. Patrioticalternative.org. UK, Telegram. She is a Patriotic Alternative official.

 

Western civilisation is under attack. White people are under attack. I love everybody! I’m not Adolf Hitler!

 

But when the Left mobilises the 93% of the world that’s not White, to then say White people are bad and we have 20 to one black on White crime in the big cities, ten to one in the rural areas. It’s not the majority of black folks, but it’s a very active minority that’s attacking us. And the FBI and the ADL fight like the devil to cover that up. It needs to be repudiated. If we had 20 to one White on black crime, I’d be against it.

 

And her husband put out stickers that I agree with almost all of them, a few., … I don’t try to make the whole thing jewish or whatever, but he has that right to say that and do that. If a lot of the main refugee groups are Leftist jewish organisations. Even it wasn’t true he has a right, but it’s true!

 

So this is so dangerous! And you say:

 

“Well, that’s the UK!”

 

Everything you see in the EU, in the UK, remember they had the deputy head of the EU six months ago? I played the clip like 30 times. And she’s sitting there talking to members of the US Congress at the Davos group. She says:

 

“Oh, you’re going to be shutting your free speech down soon, too, right?”

 

They’re like:

 

“Yes!”

 

So you can say what you want about Elon Musk, but he’s opened up stuff way more than everywhere else. So we’re thankful for what we’re getting there.

 

[03:16]

 

But Samuel Melia, … We will roll some B-roll of him going into court. Then he was sentenced and his wife came out, made a statement. I’m going to post her statement on the real Alex Jones on X. Also posted Infowars.com.

 

But she’s live with us now. Samuel Melia, that’s spelled M-E-L-I-A:

 

“Far-Right activist jailed after sticker campaign.”

 

I want to show you these stickers, says things like, “They seek conquest, not asylum.” And it shows the image of the illegals running across. “Why are jews censoring free speech?” I mean, it is the ADL groups doing that it’s not all the jews, but they have a right to say it, whether it’s true or not.

 

So. Again, you could say:

 

“Well, he’s putting up swastikas!”

 

Which he’s not. You take his right to do that, we all lose our rights:

“Ask not what jews can do for your country. Ask what your country can do for jews.”

 

And again, the average jew doesn’t support this in my view.

 

But what I’m saying is, it doesn’t matter. This guy should not serve two years in prison for this, because he put the stickers online for people to put out. Here’s some of the other ones I wanted to show the, quote, most incinerary ones first. “Tired of the anti-White propaganda?” “diversity, proximity war.” And it just goes on from there. Here’s another one. “They have to go back.” “White, privileged” crossed out “excellence”. Remember, TV viewers, like:

 

“Why are you narrating it? We can see it.”

 

We’re on hundreds of radio stations.

 

So this is what he’s spending two years in jail for. “Import the third world. Become the third world”. I sent you guys some video of Mali in Africa. Let’s roll some of that. Here’s some more. Because he’s got two years in prison for posting this online. “We’re more than a passport. Blood and soil.” Well, yeah, you try to go to Nigeria and create a White majority, you’re going to be thrown out, you’ll be killed. “Mass immigration is White genocide.”

 

Well, I mean, it’d be one thing if we had open borders and the Left and Hollywood wasn’t saying:

 

“White people are inherently evil and bad.”

 

And:

 

“Being White is inherently bad and we’re inherently evil.”

 

This is going on.

 

[05:39]

 

So the backlash is here. And I want to keep it focused on the New World Order and the globalists trying to divide everybody. I don’t hate anybody k　but at the same time, I’m not going to be politically correct and ignore all this is going on because we are all, I don’t care what colour you are, because it’ll be, if you’re anti-war, if you’re against monopolies, whatever it is, they’re setting a precedent, just like with Julian Assange, to put you under the jail if you tell the truth!

 

So we’re all Samuel Melia now!

 

Joining us is his wife, mother, also about to give birch another baby. We appreciate her, Laura Tower. And you can find her at patrioticalternative.org.uk. And whether you agree with her or disagree or agree with some and disagree with some, like I do with some of the stickers, it doesn’t matter. You should support it. Remember, the old ACLU would go out and support the KKK rallying or whoever, and the Nazis, usually they were actually ADL operatives that came out, but these people are not even on that spectrum. And there’s her husband facing two years.

 

So I’m going to try to shut up till we go to break. We’ll come back. We got plenty of time this hour. This is a big deal to start wherever you want, how your husband’s doing, what he really did, what’s happening in the UK. But thank you so much, Laura, for joining us and speaking out for your political prisoner husband.

 

Laura Towler: Oh, well, thank you so much for inviting me on, Alex, and raising awareness of this issue.

 

There’s been quite a bit of silence in Britain from the mainstream news outlets regarding the sentencing.

 

And I’m not sure if it’s because they know that it’s very heavy handed, so they don’t want to raise awareness of it. But basically, Sam was convicted. It’s a very strange crime, but he was convicted for his “intentions” behind publishing these stickers.

 

So the prosecution said:

 

“Every single sticker is legal.”

 

So the messages on all the stickers are legal. They also said that:

 

“The truth is no defense in court.”

 

So if you can prove that all of the stickers are true. That doesn’t matter.

 

And they also said the, third thing is that:

 

“There’s no evidence of any crimes or any racial hatred being stirred up because of these stickers.”

 

He was literally convicted for his intentions, his thoughts behind publishing these stickers.

 

And what they did was they took things from our house, and they went through tens of thousands of private messages of Sam and tried to build up a profile of him and then presented that in court and said:

 

“This guy is a really bad guy. He needs to go to prison!”

 

And they sentenced him for two years in custody with immediate effect. Which is just heartbreaking for us because we have a two year old girl, we have a toddler, but we’re also having another baby in five and a half weeks. And Sam will miss her birth. He will miss her first smile and her first laugh. He’ll miss experiencing her learning to crawl. All these special moments that you can’t get back, even if we do manage to get it overturned in the future.

 

[08:30]

 

So it is literal thought crime. It’s his intentions, his thoughts behind publishing stickers. It’s just a travesty! And it’s so good to get so much support from nationalist and patriotic people across the world. And thank you for helping to raise awareness of this.

 

Alex Jones: Oh, we’re all in this together. So your husband, Samuel Melia, is literally a thought criminal out of 1984! This precedent is so dangerous, and that’s exactly why it’s not getting any media coverage, is they want to quietly just put us in their modern Gulags.

 

Laura Towler: Yeah, well, when the judge sentenced him, he sentenced him for two years, and he said:

 

“I do have the ability to suspend that sentence.”

 

Which would mean you don’t actually go into custody. You’re at home. But if you misbehave again, I’ll send you down. He said:

 

“I do have the ability to suspend your sentence, but I’m not going to because I want this to act as a deterrent to other people with the same beliefs.”

 

So he’s literally admitted in court that he’s sent into prison to deter other people from being the same as Sam.

 

Alex Jones: And I love the part about the stickers aren’t illegal because they can’t admit that they’re trying to ban free speech in your country, the birthplace of, …

 

Laura Towler: I’m really glad that you introduced some of the more “controversial” stickers because there were stickers that said things like, “Love your nation, reject White guilt.” “It’s okay to be White”. There were stickers about abortion. There were stickers about the LGBT community, about saving native species and the environment. There were stickers about Covid. And there was one saying, like, I think it said something like, “Pubs closed, borders open!” Like, if you’re locking us down and not allowing people to go to work and destroying businesses, why are the borders open?

 

Alex Jones: Well, let me ask you this, Laura, because this is a “Streisand effect”. This is backfiring already. Where do we go to find your husband’s stickers in total? And we’ll just put them on screen while you’re talking. Where’s the best place?

 

Laura Towler: Well, I’m a bit scared to share them.

 

Alex Jones: Oh, because you’ll get put in jail. Oh, wow! You’re in such a free country!

 

Laura Towler: However, if you go to Telegram, it was called The Hundred-Handers. And the Telegram channel is still up. So if you want to go to The Hundred-Handers Telegram channel, you can go and see all of the stickers. There’s 310 stickers in total.

 

Alex Jones: The Hundred-Handers group.

 

Laura Towler: Yeah, it’s The Hundred-Handers.

 

Alex Jones: The Hundred-Handers on Telegram. And maybe I’ll get arrested by the UK if I ever go back.

 

Laura Towler: You might get banned!

 

Alex Jones: Because I’m going to show these. Everybody has a right to see these. Wow!

 

[11:00]

 

And then there you are. And I understand it. You’re not in a free country, you’re afraid to even tell us where we can see what he’s been put in jail for two years. That is literally Kafka-esque in 1984! You’re not even allowed to discuss why the Ministry of Truth has disappeared him. Where is your husband right now?

 

Laura Towler: He’s in prison! He’s in prison in Leeds. He got took down straight away on Friday. Luckily, his cellmate had some credit on his card, so he was able to phone me on. I think it was Sunday that he phoned me. And he just let me know that he was okay.

 

But now I haven’t heard from him since because they’re processing him through the system. He has to get my number confirmed. He has to allow his credit to sort of go onto his account and all that kind of stuff.

 

So I haven’t heard from him since Sunday. I am worried, but I think that’s probably natural. I’m pretty sure he’s okay. Yeah. Just waiting to get a phone call from him, really. But he’s in prison.

 

Alex Jones: Of course they built Covid centres all over the country. I know he was an activist against that they built them all over every Western country. They’re now saying in Australia, the UK, when the next lockdown comes, if you criticise it, they’re going to lock you up for your speech.

 

So they’re building political prisoner camps all over the Western world right under our noses and normalizing it by throwing your husband in jail for posting stickers online!

 

Laura Towler: Well, that’s the problem with these laws. They’re written in such an ambiguous way that’s open to interpretation, so they can pick and choose who they go after. There are, like, far-Left groups like Antifa and stuff which literally put stickers up about murdering Tories, “Kill your local racist.” “Kill your local fascist”. They don’t know what fascism is.

 

But these people don’t get targeted by the police. The police can pick and choose the individuals that they want to persecute. And because my husband is a White advocate, he’s a White person who advocates for our people and he criticises the government, they’ve gone after him.

 

Alex Jones: I was telling the crew that they should pull up Justin Trudeau in Canada. He’s got legislation he’s trying to ram through where you get life in prison for a hate crime, including speech.

 

Laura Towler: I have seen looks. It just looks terrifying!

 

Yeah, I mean, our laws are getting tighter and tighter and tighter over here. Rishi Sunak actually gave a speech, our prime minister, on Friday evening after Sam’s conviction, and he was talking about coming down tough on Islamist extremists and far-Right extremists. I mean, did he mean, people like Sam? Are they going to toughen up law so that he can do even less, so that we’re not allowed to go out and protest all this?

 

[13:39]

 

Alex Jones: Well, that’s how it’s, … Look, they invade Ireland, they invade England, they invade Scotland. Even got your first minister in Scotland saying:

 

“We’re too White. Scotland’s bad! White people are bad!”

 

And so it’s the UN, the globalists, bringing in the brown people and then training them to hate the White people. I mean, it’d be one thing if he’s brought them in, but then didn’t teach everybody White people are bad. It literally is like Hitler in reverse! It’s racial politics run by the Left because they know 93% of the world’s not White. So they look at the numbers and say:

 

“We’ll just be anti-White now and then make our political movement anti-White!”

 

It’s insane! It’s so evil!

 

Laura Towler: Yeah, well, all of the main political leaders in Britain are foreign. Ireland, Scotland. We’ve got Rishi Sunak in 10 Downing Street, the Mayor of London, who I’m sure you’re familiar with, Sadiq Khan. We don’t actually have an English, or a British representative at one of those senior positions. And you’re not allowed to talk about it unless you’re celebrating it!

 

So if I say “British people are becoming a minority” and I’m against it, I’m a bad person. But if the Guardian newspaper publishes an article saying:

 

“The last days of a White world!”

 

And they celebrate it, it’s a good thing!

 

So you can only talk about demographic change if you’re in favour of it.

 

Alex Jones: I mean, it really is Replacement Migration. That’s an official UN policy. But I have clips of the ADL saying, and different EU officials. If you talk about replacement migration:

 

“That’s hate speech. We want to arrest you!”

 

It’s the UN plan to depopulate the Western world. So I wonder why the Left is openly anti-White, anti-Christian? Because they are.

 

Laura Towler: There’s a lot of social pressures in Britain. I’m not sure if it’s the same in the States, but there is a lot of social pressure over here. And people are very scared of words like “racism”.

 

I mean, Sam’s trial was a jury trial, and on that jury there were three foreign people and nine White people. So eight British people and one Polish woman. And just the pressure to argue for quote, unquote, “racism” in front of a foreigner must have just been too much for them. But people are so terrified over here of the word “racism” and speaking out.

 

And that’s why I want people to just raise awareness of what’s going to Sam and going on with Sam, and just push back against it and say, there’s nothing wrong with these stickers, because hopefully it will embolden more people to say, …

 

Alex Jones: Absolutely! And let’s look here. Here’s some photos that are online of the stickers your husband put out that others got and posted. “Smash fascism.” All that stuff’s fine.

 

[16:12]

 

But then somebody else puts “Capitalism plus communism, two faces of the same shekel.” And then somebody goes:

 

“Oh, shekel’s from Israel, so you can’t say that!”

 

Look, look, either everybody has their free speech or nobody has it, folks! And I’ve been forced to, quote, “be more radical”, not because I hate any group or [word unclear] after any group, but because literally all over the Western world, White people are being demonised as the devil, just as jews were in Nazi Germany. And we shouldn’t sit here and take it, folks! I don’t care what your background is. Black, White, old, young, nobody should be taking this crap! And the intimidation and the communists and the globalists using race as a way to intimidate people needs to end. We need to move the Overton Window back to what Bill Maher said years ago:

 

“Everybody gets to speak!”

 

You don’t get to ban Alex Jones. Everybody gets to speak.

 

Laura Towler: Yeah, I mean, there are probably things that you and I disagree on, probably quite a few things. But if I went out and I saw a sticker promoting communism, I wouldn’t phone the police over it. I might take it down, but I wouldn’t phone the police over it.

 

And if people want to promote open borders and immigration and all this other stuff, I think that they should have the ability to. I think that we should have open and adult and mature discussions about these issues instead of sending people to prison. It’s okay to disagree with somebody. But I think that everybody should believe that people have the right to share their opinions, especially when he’s not encouraging violence or anything. It’s literally just saying:

 

“This is a problem I’ve identified and I’m against it.”

 

When they silence topics like this, all they’re doing is pushing them underground. People are not going to change their minds about it.

 

Alex Jones: Laura, we got to go to break. Laura Tower@patrioticalternative.org uk I was about to go there next. They wanted to put him in jail for prison to send a message, but now they don’t want it covered because it backfired. We’ll talk about that paradox.

 

[18:12]

 

[Ad]

 

[19:11]

 

This is not a standalone case that we’re talking about right now. Two years in jail for posting online stickers that people can print off. The case of Samuel Melia and his wife with a two year old baby girl and a baby, five and a half weeks out. Two years in prison for his intent to expose the invasion of the UK run by the UN and the globalists to bring in a political permanent underclass, they can brainwash and be anti-White. They’re the ones creating the racism, the classism. They’re the ones doing this. The clash of civilisations! We have all the footage of a year and a half ago. There’s so many. A woman prayed 50 yards across the street from an abortion clinic, silently arrested!

 

So if you stabbed people, you got out of jail the next day in the UK. Yeah. Here’s the footage. Go ahead and roll the audio of this.

 

Police: What are you here for today?

 

Woman: [words unclear] here?

 

Police: Why here, of all places? I know you don’t live nearby.

 

Woman: But this is an abortion centre.

 

Police: Okay. That’s why you’re standing here? Are you part of the protest?

 

Woman: No.

 

Police: Are you praying?

 

Woman: I might be praying in my head.

 

Police: So I’ll ask you once more. Will you voluntarily come with us now to the police station for me to ask you some questions about today and other days where there are allegations that you’ve broken public spaces protection?

 

Woman: If I’ve got a choice, then no.

 

Police: Okay, well, then you’re under arrest. On account of suspicion of failing to comply with the public spaces protection order, which is under the Antisocial Behavior Commons BC Act 2014. I’ll caution you again, you do not have to say anything. It may harm your defense if you do mention when questioned, something which you later on in court say may be given. Do you understand the caution?

 

Woman: I do.

 

Alex Jones:

 

“Our silent thoughts and nobody’s business. Catholic woman who was twice arrested for silently praying near abortion clinic says she fears police are becoming ideologically driven, and she vows to carry on doing it on a weekly basis.”

 

I can show you the footage of the highly decorated Special Air Services fella. This is two years ago. There’s hundreds of examples. I could just think of myself. There’s thousands of arrests every month. They brag about it. He put on Twitter at the time, an image of if you put the trans flag together, four of them, it makes a swastika. Arrested! Last time I checked, he was in jail for a long time. So dangerous.

 

So Laura Tower is pregnant. She already has a two year old girl with her husband, who’s a political prisoner. Samuel Melia. You made a lot of great points. I was interrupting and jumping in, but just starting over, going back to the so-called trial, the judge, his intent, his thought crime. And then I’m going to try to give you the floor here for 10, 15 minutes or so to just tell everybody what you want to say. You’re a really smart lady. You got the floor.

 

[22:12]

 

Laura Towler: Okay. [chuckling] I’m not really sure where to start. But, yeah, like I said at the start, I was shocked when the verdict came and I was shocked when the sentencing came. And every day it just becomes more and more and more surreal and I become more and more and more angry at it! Because like I said at the start, everything on the stickers was legal. All of that text is legal. In addition to it:

 

“The truth is, no defense in court.”

 

Is what they said.

 

And then they said that no crimes had been committed because of these stickers. It is literally his “intentions” behind these stickers, which he’s gone to prison for. And we can deal with it. And whatever they throw at us, we can handle. But the saddest part is him being disconnected from his children, missing the birth of his second child and missing all those special milestones that happen in the first six to eight months or so. we want to push back against it.

 

What I would ask people to do is, if they’re watching this and they disagree with what’s happened to Sam, if you could continue to raise awareness about his case and kick up a fuss about it. If you’re in Britain, if you could contact your local MP about it. We are looking at if there’s a possibility of appealing the verdict, and also if there’s the possibility of pursuing legal action against the police. We are speaking to legal professionals on that.

 

But if, you know, anyone that can help with that regard, obviously that would be brilliant!

 

But what I would really like people to do is become involved in something. If you’re against this anti-White narrative that is pushed on us regularly and consistently, become involved with an organisation in your country. In Britain, and with Patriotic Alternative. We’re a British advocacy group that stands up for the interests of British people. We do a lot of community building. We’re involved in the electoral route as well. We raise awareness and act as a pressure group. It’s an absolutely fantastic group! It’s Britain’s largest and most active nationalist organisation, patrioticalternative.org.uk.

 

I will also say that everybody at Patriotic Alternative is still suspended from Twitter or X. Myself, my husband, Sam. PA’s leader, Matt Collett is still suspended. If you can pressure Elon Musk potentially to allow us back on. We were all suspended on the same day at the same time and never given a reason why. When we appeal it, the appeal just gets quietly shut down. And they just don’t respond to us. If you could get us back on there, it would allow us to continue spreading Sam’s story and also defend ourselves because there are a lot of lives going around about Sam at the moment. And to be able to debunk them and actually get his story out there, that would be brilliant! Thank you.

 

[24:47]

 

Alex Jones: That is the worst part, because I’ve experienced it for five years. Being banned everywhere. You’re not just taken off-line, you can’t defend yourself and they can make up anything they want. They steal your identity.

 

Laura Towler: Yeah, exactly! And a Patriotic Alternative, we’re lied about constantly all the time. We’ve been going for over four years now and the press will put out an article about us and it’ll just be complete lies! And we can’t respond to it at all! And they’ll turn comments off on the article so that nobody can reply to it. And it just means that they’re allowed to misrepresent you.

 

So when people hear about you for the first time, it’s something that’s not true and then they build this impression about you in their head. I just think that freedom of speech for all citizens is so important. And like we’ve know during this interview, you might not agree with everything that Sam said, but he wasn’t telling people to go out and kill people or attack people or anything like that. He was just sharing his opinions and he has the right to do that.

 

Alex Jones: Well, what’s happening is more and more people across the political spectrum and the racial spectrum, when they see the corporate media and the system attack somebody, they know they’re good, or they know something’s being hidden. So it’s gotten so bad now that people see someone being demonised and it backfires.

 

I’ll go back to that question I had before the break. The judge said:

 

“I want to put you in jail for two years. Put you in prison for two years for your speech, for your thoughts, literally, for your intent, for putting out these stickers that the public could go see and print and use if they chose to do it.”

 

But there’s almost no coverage in the UK of this because it’s so embarrassing! So they want their cake and eat it, too. They want to intimidate people, but then not have it be in the news. And we’re not going to let that happen. That’s why stories like this are so important!

 

Laura Towler: Yeah, I mean, they all publicized when he got the guilty verdict, they all publicized it, but with the sentencing, it’s been quiet. I think there’s been maybe two sort of like mainstream national news outlets that have reported on it and a couple of local newspapers. Nobody’s really talking about the sentencing, and I think they do know that it’s very heavy handed.

 

[26:54]

 

But I wonder if one of the reasons is because we’re unapologetic about it. What usually happens is if you do something naughty and then they hound you and jump on you and attack you, if you apologise. I think they like the public to see that we’re not know, we’re nationalists, we’re White people. We love our race, we love our people. We believe our people exist and should be the majority of the population in Britain, and we’re never, ever, ever going to apologise about that! So I wonder if they don’t want to publicize Sam’s case and our organisation with regards to this matter, because they’re not going to get that apology? And there’s no point in apologizing anyway because they never accept it.

 

Alex Jones: What would your husband say right now, who’s sitting there in a jail cell for his speech in the once free nation of England? What would Samuel Melia be saying right now if he was on air?

 

Laura Towler: He would say thank you to everyone who’s publicizing his case and all the support that we’re getting as well. And, I mean, we did a video, we filmed a video of him before he went into the court for his sentencing. And he just said:

 

“Don’t let this deter you. I want people to stay involved in the struggle, people to keep telling the truth! I want people to push back against this anti-White system that’s attacking us and oppressing us so much!”

 

That is his main message, really. He doesn’t want people to give up. He wants people to get involved, join the struggle and play our part and just push back against it.

 

Alex Jones: All right, Laura Towler, stay there. Let’s hear more of what your husband would say, who’s in prison for thought crime in the UK. Stay with us.

 

All right. Coming up next hour, I want to do a deep dive on the economy, and we’ve got a lot of documents here, but even NBC News reports, one trillion every 100 days is being issued by the treasury. Biden’s put out more money in the last three plus years than was ever put out in the first, 2048 years or whatever it is the country’s existence. I live here, too, and the same monetisation of debt. And this has happened world-wide, so it’s not just here. I don’t wish this on anybody, but we need to be ready for the crash landing we need to admit we’re in this situation and not stick our heads in the sand.

 

So that’s coming up next hour.

 

Now, Laura Tower’s husband is a major political prisoner. Sam Melia. Two years in jail for posting stickers online that say, our borders are open, we’re being replaced. Stand up for yourself.

 

[29:23]

 

Meanwhile, you turn on any Hollywood movie:

 

“Whites are the devil! Whites all need to be killed. Professors, Leftists. Whites are inherently evil!”

 

And we’re supposed to sit here while they do all this? It’s not enough to call us racist for no reason. Now they’re the ones being completely racist, mainly globalists and think tanks pushing the brown majority world-wide to hate White people. And then White people are like:

 

“Hey, I’m not going to take this! Well, we’ll just throw your arse in jail!”

 

So, Laura, I asked you to talk about what your husband, if he was here, would talk about. I wasn’t looking at the clock. I didn’t realise the break was coming up. I’m sorry. Start over. Your husband is in jail right now, but we’re going to send him prayers and energy and love and support for his free speech. What would he be saying right now? Start over. And then what do you want to say about your husband right now, and why you chose this fight?

 

Laura Towler: Yes, well, sorry for talking when your break was about to start. Sam, if he could get a message out there, he would say what he said in the video that we filmed before we went into court. And that is just don’t be put off by what’s happened to him, because I honestly do believe that we’re the majority of people.

 

If you look at the response to what’s happened to Sam, 99% of the comments on social media are supporting him. Even people who don’t agree with him are saying he has the right to say this.

 

Alex Jones: And by the way, start over. I just want to say this. That’s why they want you silenced, is because you’re good people standing up for yourselves under attack. And people.c Exactly! People resonate. That’s why they want to silence you, because courage is contagious. Sorry. Start over.

 

Laura Towler: Yeah, I mean, Sam is not some evil caricature of some demon or evil guy. He’s just a normal family man. He’s a sign maker. He’s a tradesman. He’s obviously a husband. He’s a father to his daughter. We’ve got another daughter coming in the middle of April. And he’s just a brilliant, kind, strong man!

 

And I think that’s what the establishment fears. They want these “evil Nazis” or these “evil extremists that they can put on a platform and say:

 

“Hey, look how bad the Right are!”

 

But Sam isn’t like that.

 

And I think that’s why he is such a threat to the establishment and why they’ve come down so hard on him.

 

But, yeah, he would just say:

 

“Don’t let this deter you!”

 

Because that’s what they want you to do. That’s what they wanted to do they said:

 

“We are sending you to prison to act as a deterrent.”

 

If you get scared and back off because of this, they’ve won. So what you need to do is get involved. You don’t have to be at the front. You don’t have to be picking up a megaphone like Sam did and shouting in front of loads of people. There are things that you can do behind the scenes. You can write articles, you can raise awareness of stuff on social media. We’ve got hashtag going at the moment, hashtag free Sam Melia.

 

You can get involved in that you can financially support organisations that are going out and doing homeless outreach like we do at Patriotic Alternative. There is so much that you can do but get involved! Use this as a sign to get involved. What’s that thing about where when they cut someone’s head off, like, ten more stand up in its place? That’s what we need to do in response to this.

 

[32:20]

 

Alex Jones: Well, it’s really an amazing moment. And I noticed on X or your ban, I think Elon should restore you guys just for the fact you’re political, … I mean, Hamas and Hezbollah are on there literally murdering jews! And that’s okay because, oh, well, they’re a political group.

 

But then, … And I think it should be there so you can see what they’re doing. I think what they did was wrong. I think what Israel’s gone too far now and what they’re doing with attacking the civilians is wrong, too.

 

But we can all have our own opinion right on that. We need to be able to see the facts. But overhead shot on this, it’s in mainstream news. This judge is famous for letting people with child porn and paedophiles off.

 

So this judge looks like a really nasty guy! And what do we know about this judge?

 

Laura Towler: Well, this has all come out since he sentenced Sam. There’s a guy called No Chance who wrote a thread about him on Twitter. And it’s all of these paedophiles that he’s basically given a sentence to. So they’ve been found guilty of something, but it’s a non-custodial sentence, including people who had child porn, images of one year old babies, including people who were repeat offenders.

 

I mean, Sam has a clean criminal record. He’s a man of good character. And there are repeat offenders who are paedophiles who had child porn on their computers, who, this judge has given either a community order, which is community service, or a suspended sentence.

 

Alex Jones: Oh, it’s the same thing with the judges I talked to in Texas, federal judges. It’s in the news. They order them to let child rapists go!

 

So it’s the same thing. I mean, it’s just incredible!

 

Laura Towler: Yeah. Anything involving harming a child should be an incredibly tough sentence. And you want to keep those people away from children forever! But especially when you’ve got a repeat offender. I mean, to me, that’s just absolutely awful how they could do that. And it’s not just one or two. There are lots of judges in this country that seem to give very, very lenient sentences, …

 

[34:10]

 

Alex Jones: Especially with what they call the “Asian rape gangs” that are really the Muslim rape gangs.

 

Laura Towler: Yeah, well, actually, while we were in court waiting for Sam’s sentencing, we were sat opposite a rape gang of 42 people. 42 people! 39 men and three women, who’d been responsible for the Kirklees grooming gang. Our press call it the “grooming gang”. They’d raped, abused, and even forced young girls into prostitution. And the judge is in there saying:

 

“This isn’t true. It’s a nuanced issue.”

 

And all this kind of stuff. We literally sat outside, looking in the eyes of child rapists, and you’re telling us that we’re not allowed to talk about it?

 

Alex Jones: Wow! Tommy Robinson’s a great example of this. Put in prison over and over again for a speech, viciously attacked by Antifa. And they would tell him:

 

“Just don’t be political anymore or join us. We’ll give you a job. Just back off. Just give in!”

 

But it doesn’t look like what they’ve done to Tommy and others has worked. What’s your view on Tommy Robinson?

 

Laura Towler: Well, Tommy Robinson has actually raised awareness about what’s happening to Sam, and I really do appreciate him doing that. I think he’s done a good job of raising awareness of the grooming gangs in Britain. I mean, we’ve not always got on. There are things that we disagree with, …

 

Alex Jones: Tommy’s way pro-Israel, which, again, he’s a great guy, I get his view. I understand. The point is he understands what’s happening. He was wrong.

 

Laura Towler: Yes, exactly.

 

And I really do appreciate him doing that because he does have a big platform. And when he spoke about what happened to Sam, and he did seem really angry about it, he raised awareness about that to his followers and to people who were looking at him. And we are thankful that he did that. Whether it was for genuine intentions or not, he still did it, which we do appreciate.

 

Alex Jones: All right, Laura Towler will get updates from you. Stay in contact with us patrioticalternative.org.uk. And people can go out for themselves and see the Thought Crime stickers. I agree with about 95% of them. I disagree with some of them. But hey, he has a right to do it!

 

And I think it came from a good place, but even it came from a bad place. He has that right.

 

And I think you’re a very good lady. And I would imagine if I talked to your husband, he comes off like that. The videos I’ve seen, and I think you’re standing up for yourselves. And compared to the Left, your racial victory all is like a one. And they’re a 50, a scale of one to ten. The Left is off the hook, anti-White, anti-Christian, anti-European! And we need to stand up for ourselves. And I stand up for everybody. Folks, I fight hard against the fact that over half the abortions in America are black kids. I don’t want to kill black babies, but I also don’t want them raised up to hate me because I’m White. See? It is nuanced. Thank you so much for joining us.

 

[36:36]

 

Laura Towler: Thank you for having me. And, yeah, everyone who’s listening, please continue to kick up a fuss about this. Thanks, Alex. Enjoy the rest of your day.

 

Alex Jones: All right, you stay in contact with us. Okay?

 

Laura Towler: Okay.

 

Alex Jones: Because I look up and a year goes by as soon as there’s an update next week, two weeks from now, you reach out to us, we’ll get you on. Okay?

 

Laura Towler: Thank you very much. I will do.

 

Alex Jones: Thank you. The lady has a lot of courage. She’s a good person.

 

Again, what White people are doing in response to all this anti-White racism is a one, or a two. On a scale of one to ten, the Left is like a 50.

 

I mean, they are off the chart, foaming at the mouth anti-White! And it’s the ADL, folks. They’re racial politics. The closest things to Nazis I’ve seen is the ADL. And I’ll just call it out because I believe in Martin Luther King, Jr. Judge people according to the character of their deeds. I don’t look at colour. But I’ll tell you this, I’m not going to sit back and be demonised. And attacked anymore. I’m done. I told everybody this.

 

And it was this last summer, my six year old daughter went to a summer exercise camp, and she doesn’t make stuff up. And she’s smart. She sounds like a 30 year old woman when she talks. I tell you, she’s amazing! And she said:

 

“Daddy. During lunch, they played these videos about how White people are bad.”

 

And I confirmed it was real. It’s a cult, folks. You send your kid to a six hour a day sports camp, and they don’t even say it’s political, and it’s got high ratings, and they’re brainwashing your six year old. She’s like:

 

“Am I bad because I’m White?”

 

And then I went and looked it up and found out they did that, and I was like:

 

“Okay, this is it. It’s over! I’m not going to be intimidated. I’m not bad because I’m White!”

 

I’m not going along with this anymore, folks. And black people or anybody else, they’re telling you your back is what colour you are. You just stand up for yourself, too. I’m going to break.

 

Please remember, we’re listeners supported.

 

[38:22]

 

[Ad]

 

[39:52]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Banned Video Comments

top

(Comments as of 3/6/2024 = )

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett at The Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — Transcript

Patriotic Weekly Review – with Blair Cottrell – Dec 4, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Dangerfield – Talking Tough with Mark Collett – Mar 28, 2020 — Transcript

Mark Collett – Sam Melia Sentencing – with Laura Towler – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

Joe Marsh – Sam Melia Going into Court Before He was Sentenced – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

 

============================================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 7,273

• Total words in post = xxx
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB): (Available later)

 

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Wed, Mar 6, 2024 — Published post. Includes Banned Video comments ().

Reporter (female): Today we penetrate the world of American TV daytime talk shows, the final frontier where every taboo is unleashed. Here, Americans get to air their dirty laundry in front of 17 million caring people. Everything is unzipped and regurgitated onto your TV screens. This is the fall of Rome, brought to you from this tiny, humble television studio in Chicago. Here’s Jerry Springer!

 

[Various degrading scenes from the Jerry Springer Show]

 

Jerry Springer: Politics is my religion. It’s not my only, I’m jewish, but I mean, it’s like a religion to me. I am the father of the destruction of Western civilization. I have done that. But frankly, …

 

Host (female): The admission right here on HuffPost Live with Jerry Springer [chuckling]!

 

Jerry Springer: It’s been around for a couple of thousand years, I think we got to give Eastern Civilization a shot. We’ve done it well, ….

 

Yeah, I’m proud of my show. Why wouldn’t I be? ….

 

I apologize. No, I’ve ruined the culture. I just hope hell isn’t that hot, because I burn. I burn real easy. I’m very light, complexion. ….

 

I’m very lucky. I happen to make my living in front of a lot of people and people treat me beautifully and I get paid handsomely. I’ve been lucky enough to have the number one show in America. I mean, gosh, this is a gift from God! This is a gift from God., ….

 

Certainly with American TV, TV was always upper middle class White! And everyone on television, whether even the sitcoms, reflected upper middle class White living. And then our show came along and it really was the first time we saw another slice of the people that make up a country., ….

 

Pretty much before we started, American television was all upper class White. Upper middle class White people., ….

 

Let’s stop the hypocrisy! And just be honest about what the media does, what it’s role is, and recognize, which is the good news, that we are not deteriorating as a society., ….

 

Liberals, in the end, will always win. You can fight your conservative views, but a younger generation, … I can even go to the most conservative neighborhoods in Britain! You give me your most conservative neighborhoods and find me the people your age, and I am telling you they are more liberal than their parents!

 

You listen to the same music, go to the same movies. From time to time you probably even smoke weed. You know what I mean? Who are we kidding? Give all the conservative speeches you want. You know, you’re more liberal. Your sexual lives are more liberal. Your attitude toward gays is more liberal. Your attitude on race is more liberal., ….

 

We’re a liberal country. I can go into the most conservative neighborhood in America, the most conservative. And if I can talk to the kids, the kids are watching the same movies, listening to the same music, living the same lifestyles., ….

 

So everything that the liberals ultimately beat the Conservatives on in time will become mainstream and you won’t even consider it liberal anymore! , ….

 

I could view the election of Trump as basically White America’s last stand against multiculturalism. There were a lot of people that just see the whole world moving away from them. They see all this globalization. They see their kids dating someone of a different religion, or a different race. They see gay marriage as suddenly okay. They see all these things happening. They see the music, they see the television shows. They see everything moving to the Left!

 

And how do they stop it? How do they stand up and say, we’ve had enough? And when you look at where Trump’s vote came from, they literally came from communities where there are no Hispanics living! Where there are no blacks living! Where there are no Muslims living! How did these people even feel threatened by multicultural America? It’s just they want to say:

 

“Time out! Time out to this liberalization of the country.”

 

[Various degrading scenes from the Jerry Springer Show with Springer urging looking on approvingly.]

 

So I’m making America kosher, one pig at a time!

 

[06:42]

 

Wyatt Stagg: Jerry Springer was a politician, actor and television host best known for presenting The Jerry Springer Show, a syndicated tabloid talk show that aired between the years 1991 and, 20018.

 

Over the course of its quarter century 5,000 episode run, the show would emerge as an era defining cultural phenomenon, averaging 8 million viewers per episode at its late 90s peak.

 

At first ostensibly intended as a platform for mature political and social discussion, it was quickly retooled after it’s early seasons failed in the ratings. Debuting in 1994 with a new focus on the controversial and provocative topics for which it would become known.

 

Under this wildly popular new format, the show would quickly devolve into a theater of perversion, stupidity and absurdity, with Springer playing the role of circus ringmaster as his disadvantaged guests were encouraged to brawl, strip and otherwise debase themselves for public amusement.

 

When the spectacle proved insufficiently lurid, actors would be hired to artificially enhance it, performing outlandish storylines contrived to be as degrading and salacious as possible. From incest, bestiality and transgenderism, to mother daughter dominatric’s duos to familial fistfights, nothing was off limits as Springer presided over scenes that would have seemed unthinkable to the viewing audience just a decade prior.

 

For his part, Springer framed this spectacle as being motivated by a journalistic and even Democratic desire to shed light on the lives of real Americans, perfunctorily ending his shows with a moralizing sermon centered around the need for tolerance before signing off with the:

 

“Please take care of yourselves and each other!”

 

Conservative voices would repeatedly denounce the show’s deleterious effect on American society and public morals, but they were powerless to stop the pop culture behemoth as Springer was aggressively foisted on the American masses by a media establishment seemingly committed to promoting him.

 

But Springer and the cultural establishment that engineered his popular ascent were not motivated by a desire to entertain the American public, nor even primarily by the prospect of financial gain.

 

Instead, they were motivated by a subversive political, social and cultural agenda, and saw The Jerry Springer Show as a useful means of furthering it’s aims. The goal of this project was to weaken American society by undermining it’s moral and cultural foundations. This would be accomplished through elevating and amplifying it’s lowest elements, thereby inducing the targeted audience into imitating their attitudes and behaviors.

 

It is customary for any given culture to elevate it’s highest representatives to the forefront of the cultural sphere. This is done in order to establish healthy civilizational role models, ensuring that the society’s prevailing attitudes and behaviors are molded to serve it’s best interests. Correspondingly, healthy cultures will work to suppress negative role models, a form of cultural quarantine that limits the mimetic spread of unproductive or destructive habits.

 

However, when (((hostile outside elements))) are able to seize control of a society’s cultural apparatus, this process can be inverted for the opposite effect through selective amplification of the culture’s most degenerate members. By employing this strategy, Jerry Springer was able to tear at the fabric of American society, fostering vice, sickness and despair in the American populace.

 

Moreover, moral taboos exist in healthy societies to guide individuals in proper conduct and to help ensure the preservation of the social order. Violation of these prohibitions was, in traditional cultures, taken so seriously as to be held to provoke the wrath of the gods, a religious metaphor for the dire societal consequences of contravening socially beneficial norms.

 

Springer’s televised magnification of America’s sins and transgressions constituted a repeat ritual violation of its sacred taboos. A systematic defilement of the moral order.

 

Put simply, The Jerry Springer Show was both a mass humiliation ritual and a mass psychological experiment designed to impair Western culture through inundating it with transgressive, demoralizing images.

 

When exposed to these images, most people will respond in one of a few predictable ways. Some impressionable individuals, children, for example will slowly begin to manifest the behaviors displayed upon the screen, imitating, consciously or unconsciously, the images presented before them. The destructive social consequences of this phenomenon should be obvious in light of the people and storylines, both real and fictional, typically featured on Springer’s show.

 

Others resistant to this memetic process will become demoralized and begin to progressively detach themselves from the surrounding culture, leading to a nihilistic indifference toward it’s fate and a sense that they have no stake in its future. Concluding that the only winning move is not to play, these individuals willingly surrender the public sphere to their enemies.

 

This state of disillusionment often leads such people into self imposed exile as social recluses as they retreat into the escapism of a private world. In other cases, they seek refuge in the codified surrender of ideologies like libertarianism as they search desperately for a coping mechanism that will allow them to moralize and rationalize their own capitulation.

 

Others, still unable to process the subconscious trauma inflicted by exposure to these images, will lash out irrationally at themselves or the society around them. This often manifests in self destructive behaviors such as drug and alcohol abuse, self harm and suicide.

 

In other cases, it emerges in destructive acts of physical violence, as in the growing epidemic of school and workplace shootings that roughly coincided with the rise of Jerry Springer and the trash TV genre, obvious manifestations of misdirected, rage and social resentment.

 

More frequently, however, this trauma presents as an unnatural enthusiasm for harm done against one’s own people and society, a schadenfreuder driven by the sense that this harm is a deserved punishment.

 

This attitude was epitomized by the American comedian George Carlin, who specifically referenced The Jerry Springer Show in this context and who frequently reveled in suffering and despair visited upon his fellow Americans, perceiving it as a form of karmic retribution for their bigotry and stupidity.

 

As an extension of the Cultural Marxist social deconstruction program repurposed for mass public consumption, the Jerry Springer Show served to help realize the (((Frankfurt School’s))) stated mission to make the West so corrupt that it stinks. The social consequences of this campaign include the normalization of unproductive and destructive attitudes and behaviors, the continued breakdown of the family and the institution of marriage, the further degradation of sexual norms and standards, the erosion of social trust, the fracturing of communal cohesion and consequent social atomization, the loss of a sense of meaning and purpose in American life cand the dissolution of personal, social and national pride.

 

The accumulated weight of this ideological refuse would be sufficient to crush the American spirit, acting as part of a cultural process that reduced a once proud people formerly known the world over for their good looks, optimism and wholesome charm, into a nation of sickly, innovated nihilists.

 

But how were Springer and the (((forces))) that engineered his popular ascent able to affect this transformation? Once again, the world of literature may provide us with insight. In Hans Christian Anderson’s 1844 fairy tale “The Snow Queen”, the devil crafts a mirror that distorts the image of everything reflected upon it’s surface, hiding all goodness and beauty while magnifying all evil and ugliness.

 

The devil tells people that with this miraculous new invention, one can finally see the world as it really is. Believing this lie, people travel far and wide with the mirror until everyone and everything has been distorted in its reflection.

 

The world of modern media, of which Springer’s Show was only a microcosm, is like this devil’s mirror, pretending to show us the world and ourselves as they truly are, but distorting our perception to poison us against both.

 

And the longer we gaze into this trick mirror, the more it’s distortions begin to manifest as reality in the world and in us, so that we become products of the will of its creators. Now only able to see through the lens they have crafted, we act in accord with their designs. Media thus becomes not only a means of controlling attitudes, behaviors and outcomes, but of defining our very self-image.

 

And as this subliminal weaponry corrodes the self esteem of the unwitting spectators, they become masochistic unconsciously, mediating their induced self hatred through the humiliation and destruction of symbols that represent them.

 

And so, as Springer’s audience, both in America and across the Western world, watched the depravity unfold, they learned to cheer and laugh at the debasement of their own society, reveling in the spectacle of its decay and death. What would once have inspired disgust now elicited laughter. And what would once have angered now entertained as the theater of American decline became a national pastime.

 

Meanwhile, Springer, through framing himself as a compassionate observer and arbiter in this theater, rather than the active instigator and facilitator that he in fact was, could effectively distance himself from the depravity over which he presided, transferring the guilt that should have been laid at his feet onto his guests and, by extension, onto Americans themselves.

 

In other words, the consciously crafted subliminal implication of Springer’s Show is that America and it’s people are evil.

 

This ritual imputation of sin was the real purpose of The Jerry Springer Show, and it was used to Mark all of America as guilty for the vices of Springer’s handpicked guests and paid actors.

 

But what, I may ask, motivated this animus against America and ethnic Europeans? There is no need to spell it out. If you are watching this video, you already know. For although Springer serves as a particularly egregious example of the engineered demolition of Western society, he was not in any sense unique.

 

For decades, the controlled media has carefully curated stories and images only deeming that which is socially and culturally destructive to be fit for public consumption. This, most fundamentally, is why modern media, from art to popular entertainment, is so relentlessly demoralizing and so completely void of any higher values or aesthetic beauty. Any story or image that could serve to strengthen, ennoble or dignify is suppressed lest it rouse the will to life and power in its audience.

 

This stranglehold ensures that the captive Western mind is deprived of transcendence, dispossessed of the stories that imbue life with meaning, and robbed of the positive role models that alone can inspire men to overcome and excel.

 

Relentlessly besieged by devitalizing images, our people are left without recourse, and most cannot even envision a means of escape from their psychic prison.

 

If an outpouring of grief from the media follows the death of an influential public figure, it is usually because the individual in question has contributed in some fashion to the degradation of Western society. In Springer’s case, his death elicited this artificial outpouring because he was an agent of cultural subversion who made waging war upon ethnic Europeans and civilization his life’s work.

 

This is his only legacy.

 

[17:42]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Youtube Comments

top

(Comments as of 11/26/2023 = 309)

@wyattstagg1783
Pinned by Wyatt Stagg
@wyattstagg1783
4 months ago (edited)
If you would like to support my work, you can do so here.
https://ko-fi.com/wyattstagg
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/wyattstagg1
https://www.patreon.com/WyattStagg
https://www.subscribestar.com/wyatt-stagg
46

Wyatt Stagg
·
8 replies

@phonkphonk
4 months ago
Pin.
4

@wyattstagg1783
4 months ago
@phonkphonk Cheers. Forgot.
3

@coreyihler
4 months ago
​ @wyattstagg1783 Do you have anything on amazon I could buy from here for whatever reason my card didn’t work

@maleimprovementaffirmation5048
4 months ago
Thank you for your work Jerry

@wyattstagg1783
4 months ago
@coreyihler Sorry, nothing like that. Appreciated though.
1

@coreyihler
4 months ago
@wyattstagg1783 it was Chase Bank sent a fraud this to my wife that had to be approved

@spybot6697
3 months ago
Arrived here from the Endeavour and Leather Apron Club stream, and very much impressed with this Jerry Springer break down. I’ll enjoy catching up with your previous videos!
4

@roguedrones
2 months ago
you deserve it! Good job!

@LeatherApronClubChannel
4 months ago
Every video Wyatt Stagg puts out is perfect. Totally fresh, very insightful.
165
Wyatt Stagg

8 replies

@Gillxy
4 months ago
Need a video with you, wyatt , keith woods and asha logos.
23

@chripianflopez
4 months ago
Were you still planning on doing your vid on the war of 1812?
7

@kaneqhomme
4 months ago
TRUE

@Gillxy
4 months ago
@chripianflopez why would he do a video on the war on 1812?

@yardfowl3149
4 months ago
@Gillxy to expose the truth of that ‘war’.
1

@Shieftain
4 months ago
Ayy it’s our friendly neighbourhood noticer! Love your work, man.
1

@Gillxy
4 months ago
@yardfowl3149 havent heard of it bro. tell me

@Th3BigBoy
3 months ago
​ @Gillxy Nicholas Biddle. Start there and you’ll eventually find your answer.

@ZoomerLictor
4 months ago
Interesting how he lays out his goals so clearly in the beginning segment, Springer is an archetype as old as his tribe’s existence in the west, one that has been called out over and over again.
124

2 replies

@Prometheus7272
3 months ago
It’s a massively orwellian moment
6

@geoalpha
4 months ago
“I’m jewish”
Oh Jerry, I know.
204

8 replies

@happyhammer1
4 months ago
At this point I don’t even need to check early life I can just sense it.
46

@trustme2674
4 months ago
@happyhammer1 your jewdar is sharp
27

@folksurvival
4 months ago
@trustme2674 Not even any need for it in this case because of his obvious appearance, name and verbal admittance.
12

@titanomachy2217
4 months ago
The only way to not be sickened by them is to be blind.
14

@1neAdam12
4 months ago
​ @trustme2674
Keyed and honed.
4

@titanomachy2217
4 months ago
@mcbaka8837 Haha good point.
4

@trickywoo5165
2 weeks ago
Nebish

@xavieno
4 months ago
I am so grateful my parents absolutely forbade me from watching shows like this. The moment it even popped up on the television when changing the channel, my parents would instantly change it. They knew.
69

@yardfowl3149
4 months ago
Every Single Time…..thanks Jewerry, you won’t be missed.
112

11 replies

@labrador-fx3fb
4 months ago
JUDEN. I mean, MEOW
9

@titanomachy2217
4 months ago
The good news is, he’s surely suffering in some kind of infernal mindscape now. Death isn’t the end.
15

@yardfowl3149
4 months ago
@titanomachy2217 Amen
4

@Shieftain
4 months ago
I appreciate your pfp
4

@yardfowl3149
4 months ago
@Shieftain I appreciate you.
3

@andredubois4601
4 months ago
@labrador-fx3fb what is your answer to the pitbull question labrador?
1

@springheeljak145
4 months ago
And Maury Povich. They’re of the same tribe and the same stripe
4

@AbrahamShoahstein
4 months ago
@titanomachy2217 Sheol
2

@realpoopdealer3000
3 weeks ago
​ @AbrahamShoahstein gehenna

@OEM0419
10 days ago
109 likes, oy vey!
1

@boharcrump6312
4 months ago
Yet another devastating banger. We’re taught from a young age to embrace the rot that continues to destroy our once-proud civilization. Wyatt Stagg, I cannot stress how much relief your videos provide and how valuable they are.
33

1 reply

@areez7654
8 days ago
Indeed.

@ghah5701
4 months ago
I remember people in the 90s saying that TV can’t get any worse than the Jerry Springer Show. Unfortunately, it got much, much worse.
95

@andrewj2796
4 months ago
The point you made about demoralization is spot on, and is unfortunately something that is far too common in dissident circles. It is incredibly powerful and one of their main tools of manipulation – notice how even a win (such as Trump’s election) is portrayed as a defeat for the right
37

5 replies

@folksurvival
4 months ago
That wasn’t a win though (obviously).
15

@meab12
4 months ago
​@folksurvival it wasn’t a win , but at the same time, it wasn’t as big a loss as it could have been had Hillary been elected. Does it make a difference in the long run though?
Probably not
2

@gurugeorge
3 months ago (edited)
@meab12 I think of it as a punt – it was worth a try, it failed, he turned out to be useless, move on. It was certainly uplifting at the time and seemed to offer hope, but in the long run it would probably have been better for us if Hillary had gotten in. We relaxed too much in the belief that the big guy would sort it all out (the whole Q business was designed to exploit that, I think), and we lost the momentum that had been built up to that point; while on the other hand, the system itself was so terrified, not by Trump himself, but by what his victory represented (the mass of us out here who just aren’t buying the bullshit) that it went into overdrive with censorship, etc.
2

@jacobsteele925
4 months ago
When he said you’re more liberal than your parents I laughed, if anything I’ll just say I’m more crimson pilled than my parents. Also Every. Single. Time.
33

1 reply

@meab12
4 months ago
Absolutely. Are we radicalised?
Maybe. I’m OK with that
7

@gurugeorge
3 months ago (edited)
Latecomer to your channel and I’ve been binging on the other vids. Just incredibly good work, powerful prose and really, REALLY skillful video-making (you have tremendous skill for picking imagery and editing it). Thank you for your hard work, it’s greatly appreciated – mental, emotional and spiritual nourishment.
I’m in my 60s now, a late Boomer, and it’s only in the past 6 or 7 years that I’ve come to realize how much of my thinking was adversely influenced from a young age by tv, movies, newspapers, etc. I was kind of lucky in that I was always interested in books too, so I still had some triangulation to older literature of various kinds, philosophy, etc., and that kept me focused on the truth enough that I never quite swallowed any of the bs whole, always had a critical eye, and that was enough for me to eventually push through.
It’s interesting the difference between the 60s/70s when was a child and youth, and today, what kids are subject to now. There are pros and cons on both sides – in the 60s, the channels of propaganda were few and intense, but also subtle, and as a counterweight people interacted with each other more on a personal level, so one got one’s sense of the world as much from local interaction with other human beings, as from the goggle box and movies. But still, that monopoly had a huge influence, because it also canalized and restricted the topics of conversation for that human interaction.
By contrast, today, the propaganda is all-pervasive, stifling, and people interact with each other much less on a human-to-human level, so everyone’s getting proportionately more of their worldview from screens. But on the other hand, the internet being what it is, more truth, and more importantly deeper truth, truth from deeper in the past too, is also at one’s fingertips, if one looks for it, and I think there’s definitely a sizeable minority of zoomers (and some from the previous 2 generations) who are coming to vehemently reject this whole clown world. I wish them well and hope they have the energy to break this foul, corrupt system as they mature.
19
Wyatt Stagg

@moviereviews1446
4 months ago
He didn’t even hide it. Thanks for this expose Wyatt.
58

@wooha600
4 months ago
When Wyatt Stagg posts. I consider it a special event.
55

@GhostlySD
4 months ago
Wyatt your work is invaluable. Great stuff man.
24

@Shakalkg
4 months ago
Thank God my parents didn’t let me watch this show when I was younger
40

2 replies

@folksurvival
4 months ago
Which god?
1

@springheeljak145
4 months ago
These videos are incredible. Extremely blackpilling, pulling no punches on just how horrific and evil this modern world is.
9

@JohnSmith-su3ze
2 months ago
I’m pretty much as based and black pilled as it gets, but even I find Wyatt’s videos a revelation
Wyatt is a hero
8

@anderskjr7169
4 months ago
I don’t think that young kids today in general are more liberal than their parents. Not anymore..
63

6 replies

@snorman1911
4 months ago
Weimar times… something something
5

@dorugoramon0518
4 months ago
The zoomer generation is incredibly polarized. You will find zoomers who are in complete denial of biological reality and other zoomers who are awake to things that have taken their parents decades to figure out (if they every figure them at all). There is both complete demoralization and complete awareness in a single generation, and one of them will have to give.
21

@Leathal
3 months ago
Zoomers are heavily split by gender as well. Their women are virtually unsalvageable. Possibly explains the male polarization: if you’re a zoomer guy, you either run far away from this stuff or you desperately go for the male feminist gambit
6

@coolcrum98
4 months ago
Dude, these videos are phenominal. This channel is truly a hidden gem.
15

1 reply

@jrb4935
4 months ago
Ah! Today’s “dude”.

@thelearnedgoat8328
4 months ago
Your work is so important. I always look forward to these videos.
60
Wyatt Stagg

@HappyHumbleHermit
4 weeks ago
Just found your channel today and binged all of your work, what a superb contribution to the pool of ideas and knowledge acting as a counter to what is thrust upon us. Let me know if you’re ok if I give your channel a shoutout, as I’m fearful of putting your channel under the eyes of the censors, it seems you’ve done a good job avoiding them so far. Keep up the great research and analysis!
4

Wyatt Stagg
·
2 replies

@savagebushranger7953
3 weeks ago
Thanks for sharing it. Also binged them all.

@wyattstagg1783
2 weeks ago
Thanks. It’s hugely appreciated when anyone shares my work. Censorship is probably inevitable anyway, it’s just a matter of time.
4

@s70rk
4 months ago
Your videos always make a big impression on me and give me a lot to reflect upon.
Thank you for your work! And keep it up!
30

6 replies

@labrador-fx3fb
4 months ago
Apart from his Michael Jackson one, that was a blatant reach. Razorfist sums up wacko jacko far better; but I get wyatt’s perspective on the J media pushing him for subversion.
3

@folksurvival
4 months ago
​ @labrador-fx3fb Which parts were reaching?
6

@DiscordSuxPP
4 months ago
@labrador-fx3fb Jackson is a case of being so crazy that two “separate” viewpoints can be true at once lmfao
2

@659J
4 months ago
his entire tribe has the same goals. they always tell you that they’re persecuted but never why.
3

@heraboat1534
4 months ago
Absolutely brilliant you nailed it again. I have come to the conclusion now that if you are not fully aware of jq you are not awakened. To know this is to truly be aware of everything that is going on in society
15

@SoftPillage
4 months ago
Jerry literally admits to doing what the Great Man accused them of.
11

@hv20canon
4 months ago
As a child in the 90’s I saw this show on TV but somehow even as a child I felt the perversion in it and just skipped to Animamiacs or something else. I was afraid it might corrupt my mind. You see in my family no one is allowed to use cuss words. Even now I have never uttered a cuss word in my life and never felt the need too. One could say that you can classify me as those who are resistant to this nomadic process and have become demoralized and detached from the surrounding culture, leading a nihilistic indifference view towards the fate of the US.
12

@Yamayamauchiman
4 months ago
When you see an underrated channel, share its content.
23

@np88732
4 months ago
Every single time.
38

@flydawg7784
3 months ago
Thank you for producing such insightful analysis. Finding these little jewels/channels are a pleasure.
4

@sageantone7291
4 months ago
You can add Howard Stern to this list.
20

1 reply

@JohnSmith-su3ze
2 months ago
A Wyatt video on Howard Stern would be amazing
3

@springheeljak145
4 months ago (edited)
My grandfather always called television the idiot box. But it’s so much worse than that
11

@user-pt7kz1ng4q
4 months ago
another banger im sure, thank you for your efforts mate
29

@MyNextShotWontMiss
8 days ago
I appreciate you putting that bit in about the show first being a platform for mature discussion. I remember that as a kid and have tried to tell people that’s how the show started and they didn’t believe me.
I hated his show from the moment it began doing the society wrecking stuff. I was a young teen and wouldn’t be aware of the tribe until I was in my early 20s. I just knew it was revolting and couldn’t understand how people could watch it. His entire show was to humiliate us and change our society to the Wiemar Republic. And it succeeded.

@dyerseve45
4 months ago
I know of an austrian painter who had a soltion to these types of people.
25

6 replies

@folksurvival
4 months ago (edited)
That plan has already been implemented; they have their nation state now.

@haraldthorson9153
4 months ago
@folksurvival What does this have to do with him?

@folksurvival
4 months ago
@haraldthorson9153 The Haavara Agreement.
3

@haraldthorson9153
4 months ago
@folksurvival And? What does that have to do with the later fouding of Israel?

@synchromystics-hiphop
4 months ago
@folksurvival he gave them all they wanted pretty much
1

@TakedaKenshi
4 months ago
Spread this video everywhere, very important lessons to be learned here.
20

@vanillaexplosion99
13 days ago
Excellent video. Share everywhere. Also using the closed caption function enhances absorption of the ideological narration.

@ironfistovwudang3485
2 months ago (edited)
If i hear anyone rail against efficacy of facism again then I’m going to show them this video and why it’s absolutely imperative to implement to maintain a healthy society amidst unbridled degeneracy and total societal collapse. The fact all of these people have been allowed to operate with impunity under the protections of the first amendment is ludicrous.
4

@apolloniangerm4451
4 months ago
Never clicked so fast as when I saw a new Wyatt Stagg vid
20
Wyatt Stagg

1 reply

@haraldthorson9153
4 months ago
Hey man be more active!
2

@deanie557
4 months ago
Most younger people are liberal, but get more Conservative as they grow older because they become wiser.
31

1 reply

@dorugoramon0518
4 months ago
Not anymore. The zoomer generation has both completely demoralized communists and those who are completely awake. The pendulum will either swing back to sanity (which will be very unpleasant for the demoralized), or it will break completely and humanity will have to rebuild from the ashes.
3

@samuelhydeberg4331
3 months ago
I regret being exposed to this playing in the background whenever I would visit my grandparents’ house.
5

1 reply

@jordanroberson5568
4 months ago
THIS TIME, THE WORLD
Weimerica will eventually fall, we just need to be there to pick up the pieces and rebuild.
Great piece, brother.
12

@incognibro6669
3 weeks ago
These feel like early youtube conspiracy videos. Never stop making them
1

@sebastienengelhardt
4 months ago
Really good stuff. Keep up the fight against the Synagogue of Satan!
10

@SoozieSnake
4 months ago
Excellent work.
16

@chemicalpadma
3 months ago
Our patience has its limits.
5

@ashkatsup666
2 months ago
They are very talented at making TV and Movies cause they’re easy to consume and really affect the masses perception of reality
2

1 reply

@icespeaker81
9 days ago
>loli pfp

@ardentwhite365
8 days ago (edited)
Thank you for the work you’re doing. I’m sharing your videos with everyone I love and care about.
NO WHITE GUILT

@peterquill5039
4 months ago
Fantastic video essay. Thank you.
8

@NipperWinkle
3 months ago
Your channel gives me hope that one day we may return to a proud nation, a proud people. The modern world must perish.
5

@nmoriss
4 months ago
Awesome vid. Just discovered you channel but have been researching the parasites and their exploits for over a decade. In the fullness of time everyone will wake up to them. Question is how much blood will be spilled before that happens.

@fruit-punchsamurai4452
4 months ago
I never watched Springer’s show, but I have caught clips from Jeremy Kyle’s show, another Lieutenant of Satan, and I was disgusted watching people make a freakshow circus out of human misery and debauchery.
23

6 replies

@folksurvival
4 months ago
@labrador-fx3fb I’ve never understood why any people do it, at least not the ones that should know better. Plus, of course, why give them your money?
1

@Fury851
4 months ago
Is Jeremy Kyle one of Satan’s chosen tribe?
1

@meab12
4 months ago
​ @Fury851 as far as I know, he isn’t. He’d be an agent.

@Fury851
4 months ago
@meab12 either way I’m sure he rejects Jesus Christ just like the tribe

@JOSEPH_STOLEN-ELECTION
4 months ago
Excellent analysis… One does marvel at their knowledge of the self-sacrificial proclivities of Whites; hence their endless, avarice-impelled exploitation of same.
Though, increasingly, one also wonders if, notwithstanding – or perhaps because of – their subversive success throughout the centuries, they have not begun biting off more than they can chew, both in terms of deleterious consequences to themselves (e.g., mass non-white immigration), as well as the increasingly transparent means by which they operate. I suspect this perceived transparency is largely due to the revelatory nature of the Internet, which I really believe caught them off guard; hence their obsession with censoring it, typically by way of White-targeting moral cues like “hate speech”, etc.
3

@659J
4 months ago (edited)
notice patterns… your enemy is within the gates. he admits everything we already know about his tribe. if we point out everything he just said it’s considered antisemitism.
they always tell you that they’re persecuted but never why.
18

1 reply

@maleimprovementaffirmation5048
4 months ago
Thank you for your work jerry

@crumbb_m
4 months ago
You should look into Chuck Barris. He was the Jerry Springer before Jerry Springer. And, of course, the early life is the same.
7

@1user2
3 months ago
Praying for the 110 worldwide.
6

@zaidhernandez4601
2 months ago
My God, this was a amazing video
1

@kimanikanugu8605
4 months ago
George carlin , Jerry springer , Jeremy Clarkson
Trash Tv , psychological operation
What a Year I have seen much
And I am always waiting for new content
Please do Jeremy Clarkson I have watched Top Gear almost 14 seasons and I have a feeling you will give a teaching from there
12

2 replies

@rogerc6533
4 months ago
Clarkson too? He got cancelled by the establishment though.

@user-ek2uf7yj5r
4 months ago
@rogerc6533 He got “cancelled” for the most pathetic reason possible.
1

@valder8423
2 months ago
Been watching your content. It is really good and makes you think.

@jheetman
4 months ago
Rapidly, I began to not appreciate them.
29

2 replies

@Thatsgay123
4 months ago
Hee hee!
1

@jheetman
4 months ago
@Thatsgay123 Did you reply with that because it’s two “H” words in a row?
4

@user-yj1sw3ec5b
4 months ago
It’s a beautiful day waking up to another cracker video from the one and only. STAGG!
5

@ringkite
4 months ago
never watched a single episode, have only seen it via a critical lens such as a video like this one.
you are above some things.
4

@klassik109
3 months ago
When you watch entertainment, you subconsciously let your guard down.
Whether you want it to or not, it can and will distort your mind. So be careful with what you watch.
I am glad I did not grow up with cable TV. I think it is a testament to how I turned out.
6

@anderskjr7169
4 months ago
Luckily Springer only had one handicapped daughter. Who also only have one child.
11

1 reply

@mcbaka8837
4 months ago
Great video and analysis.
1

@declineofthewest.
4 months ago
Excellent work
2

@areez7654
8 days ago
Thank you Wyatt Stagg!

@lopedeaguirre1
4 months ago
@wyattstagg1783 – Brilliant work. I know you get tonnes of suggestions for videos on the subversive aspects of our culture – i thought I’d just mention that i watched a film recently – the 1994 “Quiz Show” and as the not too subtle themes of the film emerged i thought of your work. Athough it’s so obvious it is probably not worth analysing but it might be worth watching anyway – it is very on the nose, shall we say…
9
Wyatt Stagg

Wyatt Stagg
·
1 reply

@wyattstagg1783
4 months ago
I saw this way back. Good recommendation. I’ll rewatch it.
9

@GQ2593
4 months ago
The legend has returned with another banger.
3

@pedantic70
4 months ago
16:01 “But what one may ask motivated this animus against America and ethnic Europeans. There is no need to spell it out. If you are watching this video, you already know.”
8

@visionaryman3548
3 weeks ago
11:01 – Jesus, I feel called out specifically on this point. Took some action just today towards getting away out of the city. No delusions of attaching taking up some ideology like lolbertarianism to justify it to myself though.
1

@capt.penguin9049
3 months ago
Another excellent video
1

@helmortkuper2626
4 months ago
No cohencidence that he looks like Leon Trotzky
13

@kgbkgb7616
4 months ago
Excellent work brother o/
1

@Prometheus7272
3 months ago (edited)
The opening section is blackpilling, patently evil.
5

@dtcdtc8328
4 months ago (edited)
God Bless you Straight White Men. God Bless my brothers, the saviors of America, it’s coming ( again)
5

@ArchiveTOV
4 months ago
1:28 just like larry. It runs in their blood…
11

@DefaultGuy372
3 months ago
Hey, what’s the ambient track name which you always use in your films?

@coreyihler
4 months ago
Thank you this is the first and only video of yours I think i’ve ever seen. Definitely on the same page

@GarrettDrewland-tl9nm
4 months ago
Have you also considered a video covering anime as an entertainment medium? I feel that it is subversive in promoting undesirable values and divorces our people from our own national myths, folklore and stories in favour of xenophilia.
11

Wyatt Stagg
·
12 replies

@wdsftygt
4 months ago
How in the world does a reasonably intelligent person lose themselves in anime or manga ?
9

@leibert6320
4 months ago
@wdsftygt post war japan is basically a country in decline.
7

@wyattstagg1783
4 months ago
Definitely. I have a few specific anime in mind, in fact.
14

@GarrettDrewland-tl9nm
4 months ago
@wyattstagg1783 That sounds fantastic. It’ll be definitely controversial among our own, but someone has to sound the alarm to anime/manga’s, and by extension, Japanese popular media’s poisonous influence.
3

@trustme2674
4 months ago
@leibert6320 read about Hiroo Onoda, dude left one Japan and returned to a completely different country, almost like he was on another planet.
a very sad life yet make us ponder at how fast things are going today that the countries we live in today have changed soo much over the last 15/20 years that are unrecognizable to its very inhabitants that never left.
7

@rogerc6533
4 months ago
​ @wyattstagg1783 That’s fascinating actually. What anime would you consider subversive demoralizing propaganda? Theres lots of banal perverted garbage in this medium especially since the 90s and I blame Evangelion as one of the milestone progenitors of it.
The irony is that more redpilled anime like Lotgh, Angel Cop and Patlabor also helped me become more politically conscious of the failings of globalist liberal democracy.
1

@MrTheGuitarNerd
4 months ago
I admire your courage in coming into a predominantly right-wing comment section and denouncing anime. That took guts.
5

@IRYWQOI
4 months ago
​ @rogerc6533 Hayao Miyazaki’s films would be a good starting point. Guy was a literal ex-Marxist and pushes the self-cvck feminist agenda in his movies. Porco Rosso was his most “woke” movie before it was popular. Those same narritaves that we all know and love would later became mainstream in the 2010s.
4

@roguedrones
2 months ago
MUwhahahahaha, Keep on dodging those youtube ban hammer you absolute legend!
3

@americanjedi5952
4 months ago
He’s is now just another sorcerer burning in hell.
9

@oscarslife5497
4 months ago
the tv version of howard stern
8

1 reply

@raw_si_siht
4 months ago
Stern had a show on the tele.

@DRIFTPHONKMADNESS
4 months ago
Yupp, into the mandatory playlist it goes.

@catphuckers
3 months ago
Great video.

@xyzmedia5161
1 month ago
Good video, I like the editing/sound

@charlieburns4272
2 months ago
Not just a religious metaphor

@fredwardkillhappy3008
4 months ago
Wow.
Jerry’s nose in profile says it all.
8

@1neAdam12
4 months ago
I’ll just leave this here..

9

@fedmcglowie7240
2 months ago
Wow your one at the start literally calls it “the fall of rome”
1

@LondosMondo
2 months ago
Hes forgetting that hes old news too, society is always progressing, and it wont always be progressing left.
4

@SurfbyShootin
4 months ago
The assault on our culture is terrible BUT why arent we talking about the assault on our bodies!? Circumcision has marked our bodies with their culture
5

2 replies

@freckleheckler6311
3 months ago
Indeed. It’s strange how nobody on the dissident right do we have yet to hear mention this.
2

@Tannhauser45
2 weeks ago
That’s just a weird American thing. No one does it in Europe. Perhaps judaising influence of American Protestantism?

@DanielM..
3 months ago
Excellent and very nice J.S. Bach at the end of the video.
1

@Maverick-ne3mr
5 days ago
They wonder why they are hated.
1

@GhostlySD
4 months ago
Lets fucking goooooo!!!
7

1 reply

@folksurvival
4 months ago
?

@freehee2
4 months ago
The jewish problem is an ancient problem.
12

3 replies

@dorugoramon0518
4 months ago
Since around 500 AD.
5

@chemicalpadma
3 months ago
The true and final enemy of Man.
4

@libertytaker669
4 months ago
(((Jerry))).
38

6 replies

@dinkleberg767
4 months ago
(((Maury)))
10

@natalliaf6387
4 months ago
@dinkleberg767 (((Sally)))
5

@natalliaf6387
4 months ago
(((Geraldo)))
7

@natalliaf6387
4 months ago
(((Judge Judy)))
7

@folksurvival
4 months ago
(((Ricki)))
4

@alexanderv7815
4 months ago
(((Constructed american reality))
5

@laurencewainwright
4 months ago
Excellent work. Didn’t you do a Bob Dylan video?
6

Wyatt Stagg
·
2 replies

@folksurvival
4 months ago
He did. It’s still around on other video platforms, as are some of his other videos that aren’t here anymore.
1

@wyattstagg1783
4 months ago (edited)
Yes, it’s on Odysee. Some of the content was probably too much for youtube. Planning on doing a better one at some point anyway.
6

@occiclean349
4 months ago
12:54 Don’t pick on Eagles fans, Staggaroo.
1

@programmabilities
1 month ago
you have to deconstruct Ayn Rand
3

@enjoful
4 months ago
so true

@spoocyguy
4 months ago
I didn’t know he died

@topdhen
3 months ago
Will you do no country for old men ?
1

@huwhitedeath2651
4 months ago
Early history
15

@hankkingofmischief4372
4 months ago
satans chosen people
29

5 replies

@liamimbriolo6066
3 months ago
Every single time…
4

@oprin10
1 month ago
Is that Vaush at 6:15?
2

@mysticaccount5845
1 month ago
Review of Under the Silver Lake when?
1

@xyzmedia5161
1 month ago
These videos remind me a bit of the channel VertigoPolitix (which ended up getting banned from YT)
1

@benjaminlegger
4 months ago
Subbed.
1

@martinpospisil3747
4 months ago
(((Springer)))
4

@kimanikanugu8605
4 months ago
The 666 symbolism with the hands at 3:36
7

@wdsftygt
4 months ago
I hope German officials did punish his relatives in WW2 like he claims.
18

1 reply

@dorugoramon0518
4 months ago
What, by making them help raise of Angora Rabbits for their pelts?

@OPOS-el7tj
4 months ago
Welcome back
3

@charlieburns4272
2 months ago
I heard trump got a big Hispanic and african vote
2

@kimanikanugu8605
4 months ago
I have a request
Jeremy Clarkson
2

@coreyihler
4 months ago
Springer used americans esscapegoat
1

@americanjedi5952
4 months ago
Not true that TV featured upper middle coass white. There was “All In the Family.”
1

3 replies

@MrTheGuitarNerd
4 months ago
Well now THAT certainly wasn’t a tribe work huh? I think there’s probably a passage about it in the talmud at this point.
2

@americanjedi5952
4 months ago
@MrTheGuitarNerd

@mrsunshine6936
3 months ago
⁠ @MrTheGuitarNerd ’All in the Family’ was a American remake of a British sitcom ‘Till Death Do Us Part.’ It was written by an Irishman (the Irish have plenty of animosity towards the British) and the main character was played by a Jew, acting as a bigoted white working class man called Alf Garnett. If a non Jew played a less than flattering portrayal of a Jew, then that would probably be seen as anti-semitism.

@bluskyes524
4 months ago
Noticing is anti s e m etic
5

@tagekoolander
3 months ago
the only good parts ofJerry Springer was the Skinheads and Klanmembers
2

@snorman1911
4 months ago
Every time

@peterb1534
4 months ago
Time for the 1033rd expulsion.
2

@zacharyvortivask9734
2 months ago
6:46

@Yoyo-tx3ue
4 months ago
Keep exposing these slimy blanks
I support you 100%
5

@dramares
3 months ago
SIGNPOST

@jrb4935
4 months ago
Seven minutes of clips before the commentary starts is too long.
2

Wyatt Stagg
·
2 replies

@wyattstagg1783
4 months ago
Actually I think it could have done with more.
13

@JohnSmith-su3ze
2 months ago
7 mins is not too long. Wyatt knows what he’s doing
3

@mariussielcken
2 months ago
Chimaera

@naturalunnatural
4 months ago
Eminem
3

@oinkooink
1 month ago
What a weasel

@trentlane250
4 months ago
I liked this video I like entertainers like Springer or Maury. But the whole point is just silly. No just nope things people are much better now than ever. Dont believe me fine. Read a book like Empire of the Summer Moon or anything describing the past and well its just horrific.

Wyatt Stagg
·
2 replies

@wyattstagg1783
4 months ago (edited)
Keep telling yourself that.
By the way, you might want to take a look at what the Central American cartels are up to these days. It’s “Empire of the Summer Moon” on video and happening right now.
12

@noneofyourbusiness4595
4 months ago
“Mere exposure” seeing a thing accustoms one to its presence; it’s always been there after all.
2

@deagor4578
4 months ago
You remind me of VertigoPolitix. Great stuff.
4

@wdsftygt
4 months ago
Jew nerds are the last individuals who have the pulse of society and know whats cool and popular
16

@trickywoo5165
2 weeks ago
i never could stand that kite just being in earshot of a television made me feel sick
1

1 reply

@flydawg7784
3 months ago
Thank you for producing such insightful analysis. Finding these little jewels/channels are a pleasure.
1

@roguedrones
2 months ago
MUwhahahahaha, Keep on dodging those youtube ban hammer you absolute legend!
1

 

 

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett at The Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — Transcript

Patriotic Weekly Review – with Blair Cottrell – Dec 4, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Dangerfield – Talking Tough with Mark Collett – Mar 28, 2020 — Transcript

 

============================================

PDF Download

top

 

• Total words in post = 3,970
• Total words in transcript = 2,526
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB): (Available later)

 

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2: Sun, Nov 26, 2023 — Updated Youtube Description and Comments (309).

Version 1: Sun, Jul 16, 2023 — Published post. Includes Youtube Comments (77).