Judge Napolitano: Hi, everyone. Judge Andrew Napolitano here for Judging Freedom. Today is Wednesday, October second, 2024. Colonel Douglas Macgregor joins us now. Colonel, no matter what we’re about to discuss, it’s always a pleasure and a gift for me to be able to pick your brain.

 

So last week, President Zelensky came to the United States, visited an arms manufacturer in Scranton, Pennsylvania, gave a speech at the UN, made the rounds at Washington, went home empty handed. Prime Minister Netanyahu gave a very belligerent, belligerent, contemptuous speech to an empty General Assembly chamber, went to an office in the same building and ordered a murder 5,000 miles away, which took place. What do you see happening?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well, as I understand it, that Zelensky did not go home completely empty handed, that some promises were made for more money and equipment.

 

Now, how much it was, I’ve heard various figures. I think we have to accept the fact that the war is obviously lost in Ukraine. I don’t think there are very many people who privately reject that notion, but they’re going to sustain the facade that there is a Ukrainian government of some significance in Kiev, at least until after the election. So he was treated accordingly.

 

I think the other issue is a much more serious one right now because everything strikes me in Washington as kind of being on Autopilot. We’re sort of flying as a nation in the direction of a major regional war in the Middle East. And we’re treating the Ukrainian disaster with the usual disinterest that arises when it becomes clear that you’ve lost. All of it is bad news for the American people. And what was even more striking to me than what you’ve mentioned is that last night the word “Ukraine” did not even come up for discussion. I had hoped that perhaps future Vice president Vance would have at least asked about Ukraine and what had happened to the hundreds of billions of dollars and many millions of tons of equipment and ammunition that had been shipped over there. But it never came up.

 

Judge Napolitano: How dangerous was the Israeli assassination of Nasrallah using 160,000 pounds of bombs to kill one person and a dozen or so people around him?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: I think we need to understand that it could not have happened at all without us. We have considerable ISR assets, air force and army navy engaged in supporting the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, and its attacks on Lebanon.

 

So I think that’s the first thing. We have the capability to harvest very sensitive information, voice and otherwise, that the Israelis simply don’t have. And then we can lase these targets, providing very exact data to the Israelis, which we did.

 

So I think we have to understand that when you see these kinds of successful operations take place, it’s not an “Israel only” operation by any means. Was it dangerous to do this? Not from the standpoint of Mr Netanyahu.

 

And I think we need to understand something that clearly is not understood in Tehran. I don’t think it’s understood in Moscow. And that is that Mr Netanyahu is waging a ruthless war of extermination against his enemies. He’s already told us who they are the people in Gaza, the Arabs on the West Bank, and the Arabs south of the Latani river who are part of Hezbollah.

 

And in the meantime, he’s also struck a number of very lucrative targets across Syria.

 

So this is a very powerful war that’s underway, and we’re on Autopilot. We’re just flying in the direction. We’re helping it, we’re enabling it, we’re pushing it. And I’m sure you’ve seen the interview with, I think it’s Colonel Jacques Baud who talks about the fact that we have been encouraging this behavior from the beginning. And I think we have, and we are!

 

So the American people aren’t being consulted and there’s really no debate about it because everyone in Washington is quite comfortable with what’s happening.

 

Judge Napolitano: Did the White House encourage the Israeli government to invade southern Lebanon?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: It would appear that they have. That seems to that seems to be widespread consensus. Nothing is happening that Washington has not wanted to happen. And that makes perfect sense, judge for the reasons I just outlined. We control all the resources and we have access to and dispose over very considerable sensitive technologies.

 

So if we don’t want something to happen, it’s not going to happen! And anything that does happen happens because we’ve allowed it.

 

Judge Napolitano: But by what constitutional or moral standard do we wage war against Hezbollah? We haven’t a declared war on Hezbollah, it poses no threat whatsoever to the United States. We don’t have a treaty of alliance with Israel. I’m wearing my constitutional scholar hat.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well, we’re in a strange set of relations with Israel that are analogous to some extent to FDR’s relations with the British Empire and the Soviet Union before World War Two. Very few people are aware that FDR dispatched Harry Hopkins to Moscow in July of 1941 to offer Stalin virtually anything he wanted and anything he needed. And we, of course, were not at war with Germany. The bombing at Pearl Harbor had not yet happened. We had a war ongoing for almost two and a half years, trying to provoke the Germans into attacking our warships when we actively aided the British and Canadian navies in moving supplies to Great Britain.

 

So this is a similar set of circumstances. And I think it also has potentially very grave consequences for us. But as you point out, none of this is constitutional. But very little of what FDR did was constitutional.

 

So I don’t think anyone is remotely interested in discussing constitutional law at the moment.

 

[07:28]

 

Judge Napolitano: Well, what will the consequences to us be? Will it be Russia coming to the aid of Iran? Will it be American boys coming home in body bags?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well, I think we have to reckon with some losses in the Middle East. I don’t see how we avoid them. We know that we’ve had losses in Ukraine. It’s simply being decided not to report those publicly and to dismiss the allegation that Americans have been killed in Ukraine by finding cover stories for them, dying in other settings, other places, particularly in the United States.

 

I think things in the Middle East will be different. It’ll be harder to provide those cover stories, harder to conceal. And the reason is very simple. This ruthless war of extermination is going to be confronted soon by overwhelming deadly force, provided first and foremost by Iran, also augmented and extended by Russia, and I would argue, eventually the rest of the Islamic world.

 

But we’ve always said this, and you judge, have had these discussions with others on your show. No one in the region wants a war with Israel and the United States. The only people that are interested in a war in the region consist of Israel and primarily us. That’s it! No one else really wants a war.

 

And this has now attracted the attention of everyone in the Islamic world. We’ve been listening to lots of harumps and harumps and threats, most of which have gone nowhere from Turkey.

 

But that is changing now. And the Turks are making it very clear that the catastrophic destruction of Lebanon is not something they’re going to stand by and tolerate. They’ve got three or 4 million refugees on their territory at the moment. They can’t take any more. A million people have left Lebanon. More than 7,000 people in Lebanon have been killed. And these are hardly Hezbollah fighters. All of this is coming together. We’re seeing action in Iraq, action in Syria, action in Yemen and Egypt and Jordan continue to reach a boiling point. Precisely when that will boil over and change the governments is anyone’s guess, but I think that’s inevitable.

 

So we’re on the march to a regional war that always has the potential to go global. The Russians are well prepared to fight now. They’re stronger militarily than they have been in 30 years. And the same thing is true, unfortunately, with China. The Chinese don’t want any sort of confrontation and they’re undoubtedly sweating bullets over the Straits of Hormuz. But the Israelis are determined to hit those Iranian oil facilities and I think we’re going to see that once that occurs, it will bring in the rest of the actors who are actively opposed to Israel.

 

Judge Napolitano: Tell me about Jordan. The population of Jordan cannot be in sync with the King. The King used the Jordanian military to help Israel defend itself the other night. When? I guess it was last night when, last night Israel time when Iran sent 200 missiles there. I’ll ask you about the missiles in a minute. But is the King of Jordan on thin ice because of the overwhelming, nearly unanimous view of the public over which he claims to reign, that Israel is the enemy?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Yes. Well, remember, the majority of the people serving in the Jordanian army tend to be Bedouin in origin. In other words, people from Bedouin origins, much like the King himself. But he’s got 11.2 million Palestinians living in Jordan, and they are very anxious to help their brothers on the West Bank and in Gaza. So they’re fuming.

 

When does this change? I know that the Iranians undoubtedly have agents on the ground in Jordan, probably pushing levers there in the hopes that the Jordanians will rise up, push the government out of business and take the reins of power themselves. I’d be very surprised if that was not also the case in Egypt.

 

In both cases, however, both sovereign leaders are entirely dependent upon the military. And as long as the military does not take them into custody, remove them, assassinate them, they will stay. The question is, where does the military stand at this point? I know from firsthand discussions, people just returning from Egypt, that the Egyptian military is ashamed of themselves and embarrassed that they are doing nothing against Israel. I suspect you have a similar attitude in Jordan,

 

Judge Napolitano: Chris, do we have the clip? It’s not on today’s list. But you still have the clip of King Abdullah of Jordan addressing the United Nations? He’ll look for that, colonel, and then I’ll ask you what you think of it. He was harshly critical, harshly critical of Israel at the UN, and then he used his military to defend Israel when the Iranians attacked.

 

What happened the other night? What type of weaponry was hurled by Iran at Israel, what got through and what damage was done, as far as you are able to understand, just, 24 hours later?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Right. Well, most of the weapon systems were medium range ballistic missiles, as I understand it. These are not hypersonic, most of them. How many of them ultimately penetrated or simply attracted attention from the air defense systems, the Arrow 2 or the Iron Dome or our own Patriot systems, I don’t know. But I do know that some number and I don’t know how many hypersonic missiles were used, and they all penetrated the air and missile defense system. No question about it.

 

Judge Napolitano: Did they reach, I don’t remember the name of its a major Israeli air base in the middle of the desert. It’s the place from which the jets that bombed and killed Nasrallah came into which they returned. Did the Iranian missiles reach that military base and do any damage there?

 

[14:09]

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well, they reached the base. I think it’s Hatzerim Air Base. At the same time, there were claims made that some F35s were damaged or destroyed along with some F16s. We have no way of confirming that, and that also seems unlikely. I imagine the Israelis probably launched most of those aircraft in order to ensure they were not on the ground when the missile attack started.

 

And remember, the Iranians signaled the United States and virtually everybody else when they were going to launch. This was another attempt to demonstrate, I think, Iran’s precision strike capability in a way that would awaken some concern in Washington and Jerusalem. It hasn’t!

 

In other words, this was another, if you will excuse the expression, a “wasted opportunity” on the Iranian side.

 

And I think they’re going to be hit very, very hard by the Israelis in response. The Israelis do not believe in symmetrical warfare. Everything they do is inevitably asymmetrical. In other words, if you want to kill the flea, you use a jackhammer, you don’t use a fly swatter.

 

And so I think Putin and Najee [sp] have been advising the Iranian leadership to embrace restraint on the assumption that if they restrain themselves, a war can be avoided and negotiations will take place and can sort things out. I don’t see any evidence for that.

 

I mean, Israel has failed thus far to achieve its objectives in Gaza. It’s also failing in its objectives against Hezbollah, although that has now just started on the ground. How serious it is, I don’t know.

 

And then they have not achieved their objective in Iran, which is to destroy that regime and remove Iran as a great power in the region, period. So those things are unachieved.

 

And I think there is no evidence that there’s any willingness under any circumstances in Jerusalem or Washington to contemplate any sort of talks or negotiations over anything until those objectives are secured.

 

Judge Napolitano: The two principal American diplomats slash bureaucrats negotiating or dealing with the Israeli government on a day to day, hour by hour basis for the United States, Brett McGurk and Amos Hochstein are bellicose and in favor of war. Are they not?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: That seems pretty clear. I don’t see any evidence to the contrary. So they’re not representing the supposed interest that exists, if it exists at all, inside the Beltway in Washington for a negotiated outcome.

 

On the contrary, they are completely aligned with what I just described.

 

Judge Napolitano: Right.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: So I think the Iranians have wasted time, money and resources. They should prepare for an all out assault which is coming. The same thing is true for Hezbollah.

 

So the time for restraint as far as they are concerned, I think, is over. But they’ll have to figure that out on their own.

 

Judge Napolitano: We’re going to play the clip from the King of Jordan. You tell me if this is sincere or if this is consistent with the behavior of his military the other night. Chris, while we’re playing this, can you find the comment? It may be here, and I just don’t see it by President Biden yesterday saying that whatever the Iranians did was defeated and ineffective.

 

But in the meantime, here’s the King of Jordan at the United Nations last week.

 

King Abdullah: In the absence of global accountability, repeated horrors are normalized, threatening to create a future where anything is permitted, anywhere in the world. Those who continue to propagate the idea of Jordan as an alternative homeland.

So let me be very, very clear. That will never happen! We will never accept the forced displacement of Palestinians, which is a war crime. For years, the Arab world has extended a hand to Israel through the Arab Peace Initiative, offering full recognition and normalization in exchange for peace. But consecutive Israeli governments, emboldened by years of impunity, have rejected peace and chosen confrontation instead.

 

Judge Napolitano: Trying to accomplish by speaking out of one side of his mouth and shooting weapons out of the other side, if you’ll pardon the awkward analogy.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well, he sounds like the man who beats his wife periodically and then is subsequently remorseful and says:

 

“I will never beat my wife again!”

 

And then proceeds to go back and beat her. This is eloquent but irrelevant! Unless he, General Sisi in Egypt, take the reins and assert themselves against Israel in some fashion, everything he described happening will happen.

 

In other words, he will watch as millions of Arabs are driven out or killed from Gaza and ultimately the West Bank. If nothing is done, then the same thing will eventually happen to Hezbollah unless Iran intervenes to come to its assistance.

 

And you have to know that behind the scenes, the Arabs in Jordan and in Egypt are talking privately with the Turks and saying:

 

“You know, historically we live in your sphere of influence, yet you are all talk and no action. Why do you expect us to impale ourselves on Israel if you are unwilling to do anything?”

 

Remember, Iran is a Shiite power. The Persia, the Persian Iran that we talk about is an outsider in that area. They don’t view the Iranians as natural leaders inside the Islamic world. But the truth is, thus far, it’s the Shiites who’ve been leading and the Sunnis who have done almost nothing. It’s a very strange set of circumstances.

 

Judge Napolitano: Here is President Biden yesterday afternoon. Tell me if you agree with him Colonel.

 

Biden: I’ll say a few words about Iran’s missile attack on Israel today. At my direction, the United States military actively supported the defense of Israel, and we’re still assessing the impact. But based on what we know now, the attack appears to have been defeated and ineffective. And this is testament to Israeli military capability and the US military. It is also a testament to intensive planning between the United States and in Israel to anticipate and defend against the brazen attack we expected.

 

[21:26]

 

Judge Napolitano: Defeated and ineffective?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well, certainly it was not defeated per se, because it was not designed to kill large numbers of people, but at the same time, it turned out to be ineffective. I think that’s arguably true. Strategically, I’m sure the Israelis breathed a huge sigh of relief. You’re talking about the capability to launch 100 missiles an hour for 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours with deadly accuracy. That hasn’t happened.

 

Judge Napolitano: Is Iran’s capability?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Yes! And that has not happened.

 

And as long as that does not happen, I think the Israelis are going to take advantage of the opportunity. They’d be fools not to. And they’re going to go after Iran with a vengeance.

 

There’s a struggle inside Iran right now between the new regime, which is actually moderate in its outlook, and wants to align itself with what we consider to be normalcy in the world and normalcy in the region. People in Iran who are on the other side of that argument, the so-called hardliners, they’re saying:

 

“You’re fools! You’ve lost your minds!”

 

Judge Napolitano: That would be the Ayatollah and his crew.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well, I would think. So but I don’t want to name names that imputes things to people without knowing precisely who they are. But the bottom line is, …

 

Judge Napolitano: Understood. Understood.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Bottom line is they very definitely are standing around and they’re saying:

 

“What are you crazy? The Israelis and the Americans are coming for you. They are going to destroy you! Why are you holding back?”

 

Judge Napolitano: Why are you holding back? What is President Putin doing while this is happening? Is he talking to the new president of Iran, saying, “be restrained”? Or “how can I help?”.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: There is some evidence that the former chief of defense, Defense Minister, if you will, Shoigu may well be on the ground in Iran, along with the current Russian prime minister and thousands of Russian technicians and military advisors, trying to put together and maintain this elaborate air and missile defense network. Along with probably other weapons systems that have been provided.

 

So I think the Russians are there and they’ve told the Iranians:

 

“We will stand by you.”

 

But at the same time, I think Putin has always been predisposed to advise caution and restraint.

 

Now, that’s actually worked thus far very well, I would argue, in Ukraine. It is Ukraine that is dying! It is Ukraine that has bled to death! It’s the American military establishment and its equipment that has failed miserably to successfully halt any Russian advance.

 

But the situation in the Middle East is quite different. So giving that advice is probably not necessarily the Right advice at this point.

 

At the same time, you have Xi in China. He does not want the Straits of Hormuz to be closed, and he’s worried about the destruction of the oil facilities in Iran and access to those straits. I mean, why would the Israelis allow business as usual through the Persian Gulf and the Straits of Hormuz if they’re at war with Iran? I think it’s pretty clear that they’re not going to hold back.

 

And that’s why I’m saying that that battle in Tehran is being fought out as we speak. And I don’t know what the outcome will be, but I think ultimately the hardliners are going to win!

 

Judge Napolitano: What has Netanyahu, who it is obvious now, never wanted peace, exploited October 7 well beyond its initial meaning as an instrument with which to expand the borders of Israel well beyond, never mind 1967, but where it is today? What has he done to Israel by this belligerence to the country that he leads?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well, the Israeli economy is in ruins. There’s no question about that. It’ll take a long time to recover from all of this. That’s not terribly important as long as they swim in a sea of American cash.

 

If you look at the credit ratings in Israel, Israel’s credit rating is tied to ours. We essentially underwrite Israeli economic strength, power and stability. We underwrite their currency. We underwrite everything! So as long as this continues, I think the Israeli population is certainly 80 plus percent behind what Mr Netanyahu is doing. I don’t think that is a reflection of whether they like him or not. That’s another matter entirely.

 

But I think what he’s doing is something they strongly support. They want to rid themselves of the quote, unquote “Arab problem”, the Palestinian Arab problem. They want to get rid of it. They want to rid themselves of the quote, unquote “Hezbollah problem”.

 

Now, we could sit here, we can go back into the past, and we can debate how it got this way and how the Israelis shot themselves in the foot several times, cultivated the emergence of their own enemies. It doesn’t make any difference. This is what they want to do.

 

And remember that if you can move into Lebanon, where they’re headed now, you also exert considerable control over the water table and water resources. Water resources in that region of the world are as important as gold, and that would put them in a very strong position. The deeper they go into Lebanon, and ultimately their operations in Syria are the same.

 

Again, this is why ultimately, and I say this, ultimately, when all is said and done, we will watch Turks enter this conflict. The Turks will not sit there and do nothing in perpetuity! And we will see Jordan and Egypt explode! It’s coming, but it’s coming very slowly.

 

[27:39]

 

Judge Napolitano: Will the Turks turn off the spigot of oil, much of which goes to Israel, or are they more interested in the commercial desirability of continuing to sell oil, even to a country that’s adverse to theirs?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: The destruction of Lebanon, which is ongoing, is pushing them in the direction of shutting it down, finally. And the pressure inside Turkey on President Erdogan and his regime, which is accused of all sorts of corruption problems right now, is enormous. I think he’s going to be pushed into these actions whether he likes it or not.

 

And again, this is the street, if you will, the popular attitude in the Arab, Turkish, Persian world:

 

“What are we going to do?”

 

I mean, I’m sure you saw President Netanyahu talk about the Israelis liberating Iran from their oppressive government. Yes, of course, that drew a lot of laughter inside Iran, because the Iranians said:

 

“We may not like this government, but if you think we’re going to align ourselves with the jews in Israel against our own government, against our own country, you’ve lost your mind!”

 

Judge Napolitano: One wonders what that comment that he made was aimed at. Maybe it was Iranian expats living in the United States? But let me switch gears before we end.

 

The killing of Nazarallah, a cultural icon, a religious leader, a cult leader, if you will. But is it very significant militarily that he’s now dead?

 

Col Doug Macgregor: I think it’s significant militarily only insofar as it stiffens the resolve and the willingness to fight inside Hezbollah. Remember, his predecessor was also assassinated. The problem with all of these assassinations is that they do not fundamentally change anything! They tend, on the whole, to inspire those who don’t want to negotiate in any case. It tends to discredit anybody who argues for moderation.

 

It makes people in Israel and in the United States feel good because they’ve been able to find someone they don’t like who is opposed to them and kill them.

 

It also opens up another can of worms, which is what could happen to us and what could happen inside Israel. No one is immune to this sort of thing. When you start this assassination program, there’s always a danger that it becomes a tit for tat operation.

 

But it doesn’t change anything strategically, because ultimately all of these people are replaced. I mean, somebody said to me the other day, what happens when you remove the CEO from General Electric or Chrysler or any of the big automobile organizations, Ford or something else? Well, you replace them! Somebody else comes in and takes over. So you don’t fundamentally change anything. But you do anger, and you do inspire people to fight back!

 

Judge Napolitano: And in this case, the replacement might be more strident than the person that was assassinated.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Well we remember we killed Soleimani, General Soleimani, and we don’t need to go back over that. I thought that was a misguided act at the time and thought it was also, as you would point out, unconstitutional because we don’t assassinate the members of other people’s governments. Well, all of that went by the wayside. Has his force been any less effective? I don’t see much evidence for that. Is Iran or the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps any more willing to do business with us? Of course not! So killing him changed fundamentally nothing!

 

Judge Napolitano: Colonel, thank you very much for your time, my dear friend.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: There’s one last thing I’d like to say that people need to keep in mind. There are many ways to define genius. Both Goethe and Einstein said:

 

“Genius consists of knowing when to stop!”

 

The truth is that the Israelis are on the edge of the abyss, and we are with them, encouraging them to jump off the cliff and into the abyss. However good they may think things look at the moment, whatever advantage they think they’ve achieved is temporary. And over time, the massive enormity of opposition to them in the region is only going to metastasize and grow. So knowing when to stop is genius. I keep looking for it in Washington, in Kiev, and in Jerusalem. I can’t find it.

 

Judge Napolitano: It doesn’t exist. You’re certainly not going to find it in Netanyahu. We know that, Colonel. Thank you. Thanks for your time. This is the largest audience you’ve drawn of the many huge live audiences that you’ve drawn on this platform. I’m deeply grateful. We all are for your time and for your analytical skills. All the best, colonel. I hope we can see you again next week.

 

Col Doug Macgregor: Sure. Thank you, Judge.

 

Judge Napolitano: Of course. A great man and a very, very insightful series of operations about both Ukraine and the Middle East. Coming up at twelve noon today, live from Ukraine, Patrick Lancaster at 1:30, Aaron Mate. At 2:30, Phil Giraldi. Judge Napolitano for Judging Freedom.

 

[33:45]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Youtube Comments

top

(Comments as of 10/3/2024 = 2,013 (some shown))

@rezakarampour6286
8 hours ago
US Needs a declaration of independence from Israel .
1.3K

96 replies

@mrunderhill3970
7 hours ago
Never allow dual citizens in office if we ever have a choice again
749

29 replies

@oliveoil5789
7 hours ago

30

@Stonesour1
7 hours ago
Amen
23

@lilyBeans-cz4rm
6 hours ago
Canada likewise
19

@ji8698
6 hours ago
But no other dual citizen can do what they are doing and get away with it
20

@ziegle9876
6 hours ago
Making Garfield President sealed the deal…
2

@johnringoo756
6 hours ago
Should be law
14

@4570Govt
6 hours ago
We nose who you mean
9

@adinahaun6001
6 hours ago
Agreed!
1

@mohamedalsalmi6656
5 hours ago
In companies is considered conflict of interest and a person could get fired for it.
7

@Hellvine
5 hours ago
As a US Marine and dual citizen of Mexico, I agree.
14

@Howardlifts
5 hours ago
Huge issue
5

@briandam8126
5 hours ago

2

@thunderd78
5 hours ago
Never allow “gods chosen” in office.
19

@totallynotthefeds
5 hours ago
​ @4570Govt
1

@jacobjorgenson9285
5 hours ago
You won’t have a choice
2

@georgestavri4474
4 hours ago
@jacobjorgenson9285 Why ?

@lcollins4313
4 hours ago
President’s couldn’t be “ duel citizens. The Constitution said “must be a 2nd generation of two American citizens. Our Founding Fathers Specifically wanted the Republic to be safe from tyranny from all European influences. Loyalty to the New Republic. A Nation represented by the people, for the people . Indecent of outside Oligarchs.
3

@censorshipagainstthemiddle6198
4 hours ago
Wjen will yall accept that y’all have no say so in that matter.
1

@whitetigress4543
4 hours ago
You need to vote third party because these two are owned by AIPAC
5

@ellenrichardson7819
3 hours ago
Dual citizenship never allowed when some became US citizen until Israel & the Lobby.
2

@majorintel9623
2 hours ago
No dual citizens in any National Security, legal, or law enforcement role.
4

@HeavyMental1000
2 hours ago
I’m actually surprised that we allow this

@icemaxwell2000
2 hours ago
To all mothers in US prepare to give your children away to the new war in the middle east. The never-ending conflict that young American lives that need to be sacrificed for people that live at the other side of the world. Incredible…
3

@Davidnumber23
1 hour ago
the most stupid move that everyday people dont even realize its illegal elsewhere lol
2

@peppersghosttheater
1 hour ago
There will always be a special rule for Israel regardless of anything they decide in the future
3

@brutus4013
1 hour ago
Australia doesn’t allow dual citizens to hold elected offices. Well done my Aussie friends .
2

@Queef_latina
1 hour ago
It’s too late. They are everywhere
2

@Inafadal
1 hour ago
Do we have America any one who don’t have dual citizenship including Biden who Ireland citizens trump Germany Obama Kenya

@Freedom_Half_Off
57 minutes ago
​ @Inafadal Dual citizen is not just random reference to heritage or ancestry . dual citizens can actually carry the passport of the other nation … It has nothing to do with Grandpa came from country X
2

@AlexaTaganrog
6 hours ago
Free USA from Israel!
188

@flesz_
7 hours ago
Free USA from AIPAC
428

3 replies

@JeeeeeZ289
3 hours ago
And the owners of the federal reserve
10

@melaniestafford182
2 hours ago
Free the world from AIPAC
11

@gene8675
2 hours ago
Yes, & don’t sleep on cair the Arab version
1

@selma5885
7 hours ago
As an American, a tax payer, and a grandmother, I am deeply depressed and discouraged the direction our country has taken. Backing a campaign of extermination by Israel. God help us.
625

20 replies

@KizzieWiz
5 hours ago
I truly wish Doug Macgregor was standing for President of America!
81

3 replies

@johnsammers
7 hours ago
Does anyone else think that Iran was demonstrating they could have flattened Tel Aviv if they wanted to?
546

40 replies

@michaelidarecis
7 hours ago
Iran, Lebanon and Palestine has the right to defend themselves
614

25 replies

@63saruman
7 hours ago
Isn’t it time for all the members of Congress who stood up to clap to Netanyahu to go to the frontline?
931

29 replies

@mohammaddoofesh4963
6 hours ago
The US and Israel are solid partners, and should be held accountable jointly.
80

9 replies

@Kidbako1
6 hours ago
Not voting for anyone who looks favorable on Israel.
22

1 reply

@jaysteven8135
7 hours ago
Free America from Israel
147

@polybius666
7 hours ago
Free America and Palestine (From israel)
225

3 replies

@thaile100
7 hours ago
The Noble Persians, they’ve got Class! They don’t hit recklessly at civilians and civilian property. Unlike the coward Natenyahu!
350

14 replies

@EduardoArtistaDelavega
4 hours ago
Instead of arming Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan; US tax payer money should be spent on infrastructure, healthcare, education, homelessness etc.
27

3 replies

@kirikoo9981
7 hours ago
How a Jordanian speaks such perfect English. This guy is an American planted there by the British and the Americans to defend Israel.
74

5 replies

@deansawich6250
7 hours ago
Thanks. Biden has to read a script, what a joke.
43

2 replies

@Faiez-rh1gm
7 hours ago
I can’t stomach that traitor King Hussein
30

@nomayor1
4 hours ago
140,000 people across the globe turned to you within just four hours to get a picture of what is happening. Thank you Judge and thank you Col. MacGregor l.
33

@nejlababali7901
5 hours ago
Israel is also occupying America
40

2 replies

@gabrielkourieh5920
8 hours ago
The Israelis better not retaliate against Iran because they will regret it very badly,it looks like iran ran out of patience and it is ready to go all the way.that is bad news for Israel.
128

8 replies

@mdob5724
7 hours ago
If we had 100 million American voters watching and liking this channel would I have any hope for our future.
108

3 replies

@gethappycyclingcampingoutdoors
5 hours ago
Iran, Lebanon, Palestine have the absolute right to defend itself!
6

@Mary-f1k8t
7 hours ago (edited)
The Colonel deserves a full hour on your show, Judge.. if he could spare the time.
But.. every minute that he shares his wisdom with us is worth its weight in gold.
Thank you and God bless you, Colonel.
122

3 replies

@roshanmashoor766
7 hours ago
Respect to the judge and the colonel
149

@jacktheanswer172
8 hours ago
We have to protect this channel and at all costs
329

2 replies

@All_Lives_Matters
7 hours ago
Is Israel the first country that wouldn’t celebrate it’s 100 year anniversary because they caused their own destruction?
28

5 replies

@sabirficic3537
6 hours ago
Our country has become the laughing stock of the world with our leaders
14

@stavrosaristidou5779
8 hours ago
Colonel is spot on with all the predictions he has made so far.He is a brain indeed as the judge said.
134

1 reply

@elizabethholloway6945
7 hours ago
He’s brilliant. Always clear and balanced.
84

1 reply

@LindaMcPheeters
7 hours ago
Of course this interview has drawn the largest audience of all the Colonel’s interviews on this platform to date. People are discovering that that Col. Macgregor always delivers a balanced, insightful, well-informed understanding our current geopolitical reality, and does it with a rare level of eloquence and style. Thank you both, Judge and Colonel, for a weekly, much needed dose of truth!
181

6 replies

@hbela1000
6 hours ago
Huge respect for Col. Macgregor,thanks.
23

@zekyday8064
8 hours ago
Thanks for the opportunity to hear the Colonel.
82

@tatagata6268
8 hours ago
May this video be spread widely
108

1 reply

@gerry4281
7 hours ago
Brilliant man. He should be president.
35

2 replies

@skibidi.G
7 hours ago
Thank you Judge and Col. McGregor.
39

@malcolmt7883
8 hours ago
These people have been kicked out of their host countries over a hundred times, (through no fault of their own, of course)
105

9 replies

@riaadhoosain
8 hours ago
Always a pleasure listening to you Colonel – a voice of reason and a reality check vs the bias of western media.
148

@ddevilisinthedetails
7 hours ago
we need Col’s report MONDAYS & FRIDAYS
22

@koko2bware
6 hours ago
Col. Douglas MacGregor’s analysis is brilliant as usual!!
19

@ismaelamaro7728
7 hours ago
Iran is a peace-loving nation.
67

2 replies

@kpoonwah
7 hours ago
Times of India reported that IDF admitted several air bases were hit, including aircrafts
115

2 replies

@almercy
6 hours ago
Col. Douglas MacGregor is a national gem!! Keep speaking the truth!!
16

1 reply

@martinmcconville8401
7 hours ago
An exceptionally sobering conclusion by the Colonel. Another great interview by Judge Napolitano.
23

@nmkzf
7 hours ago
One basic problem is the establishment of the “Israel” project. the project and its owners are going down with it.
52

@jimmycricket7385
7 hours ago
Especially during an election season in America, I keep seeing presidential candidates grovelling to Israel in order to secure big donations from rich jewish oligarchs.
31

3 replies

@josephszot5545
6 hours ago
Colonel, If Trump gets in he won’t send billions to Ukraine, he’ll ship it to Israel, So what’s the Dif? Taxpayer screwed either way!
12

2 replies

@eileenjames9929
7 hours ago
great men of America these two. love their discussion the col such knowledge and integrity
18

@Mxr282
8 hours ago
Brilliant man,Col
37

@katalinhorvath8139
7 hours ago
Thank you so much to both of you, regards from the UK.
32

@polromulo2475
7 hours ago
Always very interesting to listen to Col. Macgregor!
41

@keithfazio6519
7 hours ago
So distressing. Thanks for bringing the real reporting, as opposed to the propaganda seen elsewhere.
19

@javaidakhterkhan
7 hours ago
Excellent analysis let Americans listen to this and save themselves and the World.
21

1 reply

@tommyNix4098
7 hours ago
Brilliant analysis from two of the greatest minds in America. Thank you for bringing some sanity into a world of madness.
22

@vincenthickey9760
4 hours ago
Watching from Ireland these are 2 incredible intelligent human beings and a long with scot Ritter and George Galloway are the only people i choose to hear a balanced truthful dialogue unlike the bought mainstream media lies
9

@bobbybieln853
3 hours ago
Colonel is spot on! Only a matter of time before things go south for the IDF and Bibi yahoo
5

@MeLodiCarAma
8 hours ago
Guess what…the Saudis and the rest of the gulf now have a better picture of what the Russians and the Chinese can do after this recent demonstration by Iran. Ooops, I forgotten….the North Korean and Pakistan too.
18

@hanzkoenig
5 hours ago
Thank you both from Grim Britain.
9

@Maryellen514
1 hour ago
God bless you Col. Douglas Macgregor and Judge Napolitano
5

@richarderwin2369
7 hours ago
As always, Truth! Thank You.
15

@eddie-o5u
8 hours ago
Thank you so much for your brilliant show and incredible guests. Must watch programing! Best show on YouTube.
24

@cemalparla4911
8 hours ago
Colonel rocks
31

@kevga2758
4 hours ago
Thank you both, great to see , so many folk watching
12

@2581nbl
3 hours ago
The Judge and Col McGregor deserve a lot of credit for doing their best to keep us informed. Im glad this channel continues to grow. People are sick of mainstream media
7

@minn.1
7 hours ago
What kind of democracy is it when people or voters have no say about their government’s full support of a terrorist country in these crimes against humanity?
19

1 reply

@rashlatif9478
7 hours ago
Absolutely well said by Col. Douglas
19

@katedocherty264
7 hours ago
Thank you Judge for this lively and honest discussion with Col. MacGregor.
15

@Vegandi_Z
8 hours ago
Judge, I love you, but you gotta stop asking endless questions, when the Colonel already got it and tries to answer…
14

1 reply

@Sw-nv4hw
8 hours ago (edited)
Thank you 2 and my dadda designed missles too. Yet im a disabled aussie seaman. Loved and not! 2 The world needs more men like you judge and the good col. Period!
20

@simonemindfulness1057
3 hours ago
Much love to all Palestinians and Lebaneses from Brazil
4

1 reply

@928pcar
7 hours ago
The Iron Dome turned into the IRAN DOME last night LOL
25

3 replies

@G.oogleIsCensorship
7 hours ago
THE KING OF JORDAN MAKES ME SICK. CESSCH OUT
19

2 replies

@sws-vlogs
8 hours ago
Idf Juz expect us to believe they had no prior knowledge of 10/07
40

2 replies

@rac1030
7 hours ago
You’re both great men. God bless you all.
20

@plank8241
5 hours ago
So great to have COL. MacGregor on your channel! Love the man’s honesty and straightforwardness, it takes a hell lot of courage to articulate the issues that he does considering today’s situation with the freedom of speech and mass media being rather tools of repression than information sources
5

@20luzer52
6 hours ago
The problem with Judge Napolitano and Douglas Macgregor is that they have a sense of morals and principles
9

@99PUTNAM
7 hours ago
Thank you for Macgregor… brilliant and commitment to reality in opposition to the ZIONIST crazies
13

@sankheroshamoun7624
6 hours ago
Thank you Judge you get the wisest gests on your show.
10

@MarcWiedmann
4 hours ago
German here – staying up to date on information on Ukraine and the Middle East on a weekly basis due to this channel. Thanks Judge Nap, thanks Col. Macgregor. We need competent, analytical and intelligent people. I hope you are a lightpost for a lot of people. “The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either — but right through every human heart — and through all human hearts. This line shifts. Inside us, it oscillates with the years. And even within hearts overwhelmed by evil, one small bridgehead of good is retained”
8

2 replies

@MikeMelia51
5 hours ago
Thanks Colonel
10

@jimtaleb4364
7 hours ago
$5.00
Thanks!
30

1 reply

@mindbliss7764
4 hours ago
I have so much respect for Col Douglas. Such a great thinker
3

@Frankchiew59
7 hours ago
King Abdullah will be deposed very soon.
8

@Smiff1066
7 hours ago
Meanwhile 10,s of thousands Americans are suffering in the South East, maybe up to a thousand have died, wheres their help?
44

8 replies

@ceaget7252
7 hours ago
Colonel Macgregor has superb knowledge, analytical skills and wisdom. A rare individual indeed.
9

1 reply

@BerndSchmitt-Martinique
5 hours ago
Aristotle: ‘Republics decline into democracies and democracies degenerate into despotisms.’
5

@Mary-f1k8t
7 hours ago
The We Love Africa channel is very good about posting UN speeches.
11

1 reply

@WORKOUTSOLUTIONS
8 hours ago
ХРИСТОС ВОСКРЕСЕ
БОГ С НАМИ ПРОТИВ ЗЛА И ИСКУШЕНИЙ
20

1 reply

@JacquelineAgnesGilfillan
5 hours ago
Thanks for all this clarity, Judge and Colonel
4

@jonnyboy8781
6 hours ago
Judge, your show last eve with Scott was epic. History being made in real-time. Love the show, all your eminent guests & your great presenter skills. Fantastic.
11

1 reply

@richardpquette6992
6 hours ago
Complete BS: we (USA) are Ordering it, We are Arming it, We are Loading it, we are Surveilling it, we are funding it, we are deciding it, we are loading the strike data….
9

@mickgallagher6717
6 hours ago
Thank God for this highly astute, logical, sane Spiritual beings, truthtellers, Peacemakers!
2

@AngelaOMeara-th1en
2 hours ago
thanks Colonel, your voice is needed Louder and Louder.
1

@thomashand1316
6 hours ago
How many military men quote Goethe and Einstein ? Colonel McGregor is one of a kind.
7

@williamgianopulos636
8 hours ago (edited)
It’s not an Israeli-only scenario, as our guest points out. Of course not. Israel didn’t produce the 60-80 bombs that flattened the apartment complex in Beirut. We are the only game in town, so let’s start considering other options, like talking to one another again. As Churchill said, Meeting Jaw to Jaw is better than war.
11

@lucienleech-larkin7544
8 hours ago
Colonel, How Do You “Debate” A Mendacious Pseudology?!! There’s No Point At All In Arguing Against A Narrative Which Has No Relationship To The Actual Facts!! All You Can Do, Is Get Rid Of The Bastards Who Are Lying To You; Anything Else Is Just Irrelevant!!
5

@bittertruth3295
6 hours ago
Great man col McGregor, always on point. Thank you Judge for inviting him.
1

@williammichael2156
6 hours ago
Thanks gents,blessings from Glasgow
4

@bravestone8933
8 hours ago (edited)
King of Jordan is like the former president Ashraf Ghani of Afghanistan.
27

2 replies

@vancouver_dad5195
7 hours ago
Love from the Philippines
10

@a.j.rainey3024
7 hours ago
After last April’s missile exchange, Russia supplied Iran with S400/500 air defense systems along with most advanced “radar jamming” systems. If US/Israel attacks Iran many fighter/bomber jets will be downed. Manned jet fighters are rapidly becoming obsolete in todays war theater.
13

2 replies

@MochoCoLaTo911
5 hours ago
From Canada, I seriously think that if we put the people we use to see in Judge Napolitano Chanel in charge of the Gov. they will make USA great again and for a long long time !
2

@johnoneill192
7 hours ago
It’s quite obvious that the leaders of Egypt and Jordan still have PTSD from 1967 particularly and also 1973 and are frozen with fear of a repeat of those wars against Israel ( and of course America as they could destroy Israel if they combined forces if America wasn’t backing Israel unconditionally ) but I think the ordinary people of all the Muslim nations have really had enough of Israel’s atrocities against fellow Arabs. This Netenyahu maniac wants war with all his neighbours and is only in a position to prosecute these wars on multiple fronts because of American backing
15

4 replies

@Harvey-Sp
8 hours ago
Judge, You among the wise men in our country. The UAP threat is real. What’s going on in the Middle East is nothing comparable to the UAP threat.
6

1 reply

@feryag
7 hours ago
From a very insightful man “genius consistent of knowing when to stop.” Thank you, Col. Macgregor.
6

@bulentunal3832
7 hours ago
you are right judge. he is a waste, King Abdullah
7

@ShortbusMooner
7 hours ago
Thank you so much, gentlemen!
5

@louisepelte2942
7 hours ago
Very depressing as usual.
7

@NoorFalastin110
6 hours ago
Thank you for all you do gentlemen. Thank you for choosing humanity
1

@juanluistostadocanales3955
7 hours ago
That is right Colonel
8

@SADIKDIN
6 hours ago
A little 3 yr old girl being stucked under a rubble with 1 arm decacipitated crying and pleaded, ‘Mummy I want to go home,…I want to go home’. But her parents already died under the rubble and no way to rescue the little girl. The nexf day the little girl died of agony being pinned under the rubble. Can we sleep at night knowing all these horrifying events are happening to thousands of little children?
9

2 replies

@chrisnicolis1304
2 hours ago
The judge has compiled an impressive list of guests over the last couple of years. I never fail to be impressed by the knowledge and wisdom of Colonel Macgregor
1

@davidlaw1690
4 hours ago
America is Israel’s little nodding duck
3

@christiancommunistpartyoft8691
5 hours ago
Israel is doomed
4

@Linus-k6c
6 hours ago
It’s always a big joy to listen to you and to Macgregor. The final statement is brilliant. The final statement will remain in history. The final statement is truly inspiring. Hope to see you soon. Thank you very much.
1

@lindachan5610
17 minutes ago
Good final reflection from Colonel Macgregor. Stopping in time is better than losing everything.
1

@nazhamerabi4395
7 hours ago
The Iranians need to listen to Col. Macgregor. Why are they holding back? That was Hassan Nasrallah’s mistake listening to them. It’s now or never!!!
16

1 reply

@chrisgreene2623
7 hours ago
The Colonel is in the house!
5

@craigaxle1096
6 hours ago
Praying for peace, healing & reconciliation in the middle east, Ukraine-Russia, Sudan , China, …
1

@sinaisapour7584
3 hours ago
Long live Iran and the resistance
2

@elwoodguy7955
8 hours ago
Wonder how Bibi reflects on his speech at the UN LAST week? Given how Iran responded to it l believe he thinks it may of been an error. Whilst the UN has been giving speech after speech -deploring Bibi -iran steps up well done Iran
5

@arifurrahman2891
7 hours ago
Colonel’s last words are highly terrifying. Something extremely devastating is going to visit the entire ME region in the months and years ahead. Current standing of things will only keep deteriorating from this moment onward.
4

@paullilliott7565
6 hours ago
‘Safe and effective’……
‘Defeated and ineffective’
same script writer?
Very valuable last words, Colonel. Thank you both for keeping us informed.
1

@mariojcollado1384
1 hour ago
Col. MacGregor is a valuable asset as we pursue clarity and potential resolutions for conflicts home and abroad
1

@fordshaw5833
4 hours ago
Colonel Macgregor’s mention of Israel’s habit of heavy handed use of lethal force
reminds me of the Confucian maxim, “Never use cannon to kill mosquito”. So far Israel has shown little economy of effort in their combat operations which says something about whose picking up the tab for their war which would have otherwise bankrupted the Israeli tax base.
8

1 reply

@MrCarhoo
7 hours ago
Thanks doug
5

@RobinaOmar-o3e
7 hours ago
Absolutely fantastic, madness he has said is repeating an exercise and expecting a different result. Israelis have been doing this for decades and hoping for a different result.
2

@kilok9599
7 hours ago
Brilliant analysis as always. Luv the Col!
6

@RNX09
6 hours ago
Thanks Judge for persisting with these videos with your informative guests. All of them are great.
1

@mariadasilva3444
5 hours ago
Thanks Judge and Col. MacGregor. Good to know unbiased truth.

@HoldTheBacon
1 hour ago
I don’t understand how we can pass bills in congress in a matter of seconds when it comes to giving Israel billions yet we can’t fix healthcare or our infrastructure at minimum.
3

1 reply

@peaceb4
3 hours ago
I’m almost certain that America’s own law would forbid the sale or supply of weapons to any country that has Nuclear Weapons while not being a signatory to the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty!
5

1 reply

@nicholasmartiau1728
6 hours ago
Col. Ma Gregor is 2nd to none with his unique inside insight gained from decades of commanding soldiers and armies who executed some of histories most daring and consequential actions. Thanks Judge for having Colonel MacG on you show! We really appreciate it.
1

@EduardoArtistaDelavega
4 hours ago
Iran is not our enemy.
2

@wanderingquestions7501
5 hours ago
I would like to see episodes in which guests are able to identify for us voters which of our politicians are strongly owned by AIPAC. This would be helpful for identifying who one may wish, or not wish to vote for.
4

@avinadehnad1058
7 hours ago (edited)
Colonel Macgregor, thank you for your thoughtful insight. The only thing that was not accurate was that:
Iranians would never align themselves with the Israeli government because they are morally against the Israeli governments Genocide and Indiscriminate killings, and because of over 40 years of illegal sanctions, assassinations, and malignment of Iran, just because they criticize Apartheid in Israel. It has nothing to do with the ‘not aligning with Jews’* as you mentioned, although I understand the spirit of what you said. If Iranians have any problems with their government, Iranians are very capable of dealing with it together, and don’t need Netanyahu stick his murderous axe in.
*Iran has one of the largest and oldest Jewish populations in the middle east. They have lived in harmony with other religions in Iran for thousands of years. Iran being against Jews is part of the Pompeo warmongering narrative that has been debunked by historians and Iranian Jews continuously through intelligent media.
3

@jkb728
3 hours ago
Judge and colonel mcgregor absolute wisdom
1

@RuaidhriOSioradain
3 hours ago
Thanks Judge excellent as per usual, Col, I salute you, wonderful analyst
1

@volkiruski1221
7 hours ago
That Jordan Puppet King is also and only Bla bla, real arabs, lots of talking, like always!! Time for change to another king. I tought his wife has more guts?
6

1 reply

@gustav4539
6 hours ago
I know I’m being “directed” by a YT algorithm because I watched a few videos featuring John Mersheimer and Jeffrey Sachs, but it seems like American critics of the actions of Israel are getting more numerous. When I started understanding this situation 25 years ago it was mainly lefties like Chomsky and Finkelstein who were criticizing Israel. This is a good development, even if right-wingers came to this through America First.
3

@AshrafAnwar-e7s
3 hours ago
Brilliant as usual. Thank you both.
1

@jackypackham7666
6 hours ago
I’d vote for him, shame he isn’t standing in the UK.
1

@nm1978
7 hours ago
man speaking logic
3

@farishtajebran7317
8 hours ago
We salute IranWe support IranWe stand with IranWe pray for Iran,s victory Thank you Iran
23

@MohamedAhmed-sc3yq
7 hours ago
Well said.
3

@nosceteipsum997
3 hours ago
Extremely wise words, colonel! Thumbs up from the UK!!

@mattyarrow4406
2 hours ago
Thanks to the both of you for a great interview.
1

@ExileTheKnightsOfMaltaNow
8 hours ago
Say hello to our heretic October surprise…… Pope Clement 14th birthday is October 31st and we are going to honor his Devotion to expelling Jesuit order from all the de facto Roman cartel Nations
7

@miss_rini
6 hours ago
Something about McGregor’s energy, it makes me feel just a little safer. Like it might feel if the US did have leaders who could convey strength and power with the people; as opposed to power over people.
5

1 reply

@byronhay1648
2 hours ago
Colonel Douglas Macgregor’s Analysis is right on.

@danielperez-sz2ii
35 minutes ago
Great analysis by two real Patriots! Thank you gentlemen.

@RUcookoo
3 hours ago
Is America still paying Egypt and Israel millions a year not to fight each other ?
3

2 replies

@musajallow5710
7 hours ago
great colonel indeed
4

@AntonioJose-fy3zh
1 hour ago
Thanks Coronel Douglas Macgregor…for exposing the world of reality

@hussmortada
5 hours ago
The most revealing and honest interview I have seen since the start of the conflict. Very interesting indeed, calling a spade a spade. Hat off to you both.
1

@MA-sk4fg
7 hours ago
The sad thing about these futile wars is that lots of people got killed for absolutely nothing!!! What a waste of souls.
3

@Puzian
7 hours ago
The Colonel isn’t correct about Türkiye. So far, all the Turks have done is talk. They will not fight. They will not stop the oil.
21

13 replies

@betweendrinks8885
4 hours ago
One day you’ll wake to NO judge and Doug – no internet – no TV broadcast – no power – skies blazing from afar and darkening – sirens in distance – heat unbearable- and no going back to what we once had
2

@maxmurphy7306
3 hours ago
Great full cycle analysis guys.
Thank you judge Napolitano and colonel macgregor.
TRUE AMERICAN GRIT.

@Al7amed
8 hours ago
Iran didn’t signal anyone this time ! That was the last time, not this time.
10

2 replies

@neviocapodagli4742
7 hours ago
Amazing
3

@dbassman27
5 hours ago
I value Col. Macgregor’s comments. Voice of sanity and reason in a maelstrom of hate and insanity.

@POLISHAMERICANLEGIONS
1 hour ago
Thank you very much for the great analysis great us Patriot colonel graduate of two military institutes and also to the Justice Napolitano for your great analysis every day and I am Polish American from McLean Virginia
2

@MultiPrairiedog
6 hours ago
A vote for Trump or Harris is a vote for israel.
13

4 replies

@TheVigilantEye77
8 hours ago
The Constitution? What is that ?
4

1 reply

@INNIMA
1 hour ago
Im sick and tired of the iranian restraint
1

@davetrump1584
8 hours ago
Hypersonic weapons, like ballistic missiles, fly at speeds of at least Mach 5, or roughly 1 mile per second. Unlike ballistic missiles, hypersonic weapons do not follow a ballistic trajectory and can maneuver en route to their target.
22

5 replies

@carlosorff
6 hours ago (edited)
Iran must not fall, as it is the gate to Russia from the south. So be prepared for Russia and China to protect its interest.Also the Turks. 31:37 I really do admire the wisdom of Mr. MacGregor and I agree fully with his last thought.
4

@RiyadHaybe
3 hours ago
I agree with last Statement that the Colonel made. Very Dangerous!
2

@McKav
9 minutes ago
Col. Macgregor (ret.) is brilliant. His analysis is crucial to understanding the true facts

@xp3703
7 hours ago
King of Jordan: “Elocuent but irrelevant” Precisely. So well said
11

@L16s13O-
7 hours ago
Future VP Vance? How presumptuous of you. I’m not for neither one of them but Trump is no better.
4

@litttoe
3 hours ago
It’s unbelievable that we are at this point in reality.
1

@peaceb4
3 hours ago
A fair and just UN would send UN Peacekeepers to Gaza and UN Weapons Inspectors to Israel
2

@gnosticbrian3980
7 hours ago
Read the Brookings Institute strategy document titled: “Which path to Persia?: options for a new American strategy toward Iran”. Written in 2009, it sets out how America could use Israel as a proxy to sow discord and war throughout the Middle East. And that template appears to have been followed.
5

3 replies

@letterpress01
7 hours ago
Other podcasts have reported that the Israelis were taken by surprise and there was a great deal of damage done. Some of the videos show dozens of ballistic missiles hitting the airbase. The opposite of what you are describing though I am a fan Colonel.
3

1 reply

@DarrenSmith-tq2xz
1 hour ago
Thanks for the great content once again God bless you col Douglas magregor and judge napalotano stay safe and well both of you

@bullasbullas
3 hours ago
Another great show Judge. Keep it coming.

@mariadasilva3444
5 hours ago
The King of Jordan speech is convincing! However, it’s just “empty” words! Don’t trust him at all!
5

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

/>

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live. It is the 19 July 2024, and this is Hulk Hogan:

 

“So all you criminals, all you lowlifes, all you scumbags, all you drug dealers, and all you crooked politicians need to answer one question, brother! What you gonna do when Donald Trump and all the trumpomaniacs run wild on you, brother? [crowd cheers] God bless you and thank you.”

 

Anyway, I thought that was kind of funny. America’s funny. You’re muted, by the way, Tom.

 

Thomas Sewell: They’re obsessed with the hand gesture now. Like the fist. They’re really doing it. They’re like, overdoing it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, HH, though. HH! Start of the stream.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, HH!

 

Joel Davis: But yeah, unfortunately, Blair can’t make the show tonight. I was actually going to do a show last night with Blair, but I had some personal things come up, so it’s actually my fault. Blair already had something on tonight.

 

I was going to do a show with Blair and then a show with Tom because they were busy on the alternate nights.

 

But yeah, something came up for me yesterday. So sorry to have run at home. It’s not Blair’s fault that he’s missing this week. It’s actually my fault, really. Although what happened to me was outside of my control as well.

 

So, anyway, point is, unfortunately, no Blair this week, which sucks, but we’ve got Tom. So it’s the Joel and Tom show. And we are going to change the name. I’ve made progress on the new name, but we’re going to make graphics. I Whittled it down to two choices and we’ll see. I’ll see how the graphics come up. We’ll make a decision on what name we want to go forward with. But for now, it’s the Joel and Tom show.

 

As I said, it’s the 19 July 2024 and a lot to talk about.

 

Been a big week, particularly in American politics. It’s going to be a lot of American politics, I think, in this show, but also some things happening at home, including Blair himself attempting to get onto YouTube with some normie friendly content and getting swiftly censored. The NSN boys were out in force, destroyed. Pedo freaks rally down in Adelaide. We can analyze that a little bit. So lots of to cover. Immigration, news, and so on.

 

But first of all, Tom, I want to get your take on., … Do you think that the assassination attempt on Trump was set up? Do you think he was set up like he was? Some elite actors, some powerful actors, conspired to have him taken out and basically they got unlucky. It didn’t materialise.

 

Or do you think it was just some random libtard and just mass incompetence from the Secret Service because there’s obviously a lot going for both narratives, but there’s a lot of, I don’t know how close you’ve been following the story, but there’s a lot of very strange aspects to the story that make me lean towards the setup theory. But where do you stand?

 

 

Thomas Sewell: I believe that it was a setup. I think that the Secret Service was under orders to allow it to happen.

 

The idea that it could be just a mere fluke that they would, … Like a lot of the libtards are pretending that this was a setup from another angle. They’re pretending it’s like a was set up to be fake as opposed to set up to be real. I think it was set up to be real. But I think it’s a combination of everything you said. I think it’s a combination of one part incompetence, one part dysgenic freak libtard who also happened to be in a Blackrock promotion video or advertising video for a school or something.

 

So that’s odd. That shows that the person is somewhat, even if it’s three steps removed, they’re politically connected somehow. Yeah. There’s just a combination of factors.

 

And so I think that there was a serious attempt on his life. I don’t think it’s a, … I don’t think there was an effort to try to not kill him. You know what I mean? I think that his head turn at the last minute is what saves his life. So I do think that’s sincere.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: I mean, and there’s a lot of, … Sorry, before I pass it back. The last thing I’ll say on it, because I’m sure you’ve got a lot to say on it, is there’s so many people on the Internet talking about the ballistics and talking about how could you miss from that distance? And everyone’s all of a sudden a marksmanship expert whenever there’s like, a shooting.

 

And, yeah, it, to me, it undermines every other incident that’s ever happened in my mind when you get, just dozens of people in the group chats and on Twitter, you know, talk, trying to break down how impossible it is to miss at that distance. And I don’t think any of these people have any sort of realistic training. The amount of stress this guy would have been under to only miss by, like, a couple inches from a really unstable position. I believe he had iron sights as well.

 

I mean, that’s actually quite a hard shot to make, even if, you know how to use it, considering the stress. He got to be within a couple inches. And that’s even for trained soldiers, that’s actually quite hard to get that first hit at that distance.

 

So, yeah, that’s frustrating!

 

Joel Davis: And if he didn’t turn his head, like, it would have hit. So he came pretty close.

 

Thomas Sewell: Absolutely! Yeah, yeah. The shooter was basically on the mark.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, he did fire off more shots, but., …

 

[06:07]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, but they don’t count. Yeah. Because after that first shot, it throws everything out. He’s not in a stable firing position.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And he knows that he’s just about to die as well.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, exactly! The adrenaline would have been crazy! Like, the secret to marksmanship is, … Well, there’s many basic principles, but one of them is to stay calm, to just be calm and breathe. It’s a form of meditation.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And you can’t do that in that scenario, as some, like, 20 year old, untrained or barely trained young guy. It’s not possible. Yeah, I think it’s sincere. That’s just the short answer.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But the setup theory isn’t that the guy wasn’t a sincere libtard. That’s obviously true.

 

But the idea is that he’s a patsy, that he was groomed, perhaps, and that then there was a conspiracy to basically undermine the Secret Service from effectively protecting Trump to enable him to get in position and take the shot.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, absolutely!

 

Joel Davis: And there’s a few weird, … Because they could say:

 

“Well there’s this woman running the Secret Service who’s incompetent. Look at all these incompetent women running around!”

 

You know, we’ve seen the images. There was that one woman who doesn’t seem to know how to put her gun back in her holster. It was quite comical.

 

But that’s almost like part of the setup. Like, if you were going to do a setup, you would put a bunch of incompetent women all around it to make it look like incompetence. Like that would be part of doing a good setup. And, it’s not like the Secret Service have a track record of incompetence. They’re pretty competent.

 

There were people that were interviewed who said:

 

“Oh, I’ve been to heaps of Trump rallies over the year. And I remember when I got to this one, it was quite strange, because I was looking around at all the roofs and there was only like two snipers up there.”

 

But he’s like:

 

“Every other Trump rally I’ve ever been to, it’s just covered in snipers! And it’s just covered in personnel. They seemed way understaffed!”

 

And that building, it was a very obvious building. Like, they had people like experts from military intelligence and so on, even on like Left-wing media like CNN that got interviewed. And they were like:

 

“I think it was a setup because of the sheer incompetence is almost too high for it to be believable because it’s such an obvious position.”

 

They said:

 

“Like, if you identify that position almost immediately as one of the main positions that you have to secure, and you would immediately put personnel on the building.”

 

But the fact that they didn’t put any personnel on that building, he says, it’s just insane! Like, there’s no way that you could have that kind of oversight. When they interviewed the head of the Secret Service, I can’t remember her name. And I don’t know why a woman is running the Secret Service. It’s quite crazy! And why she hasn’t stepped down yet and why she hasn’t been fired! [chuckling] I mean, that’s even more crazy, after what happened.

 

Thomas Sewell: And criminally investigated.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, I’m sure there’ll be an investigation, particularly considering that Trump is going to win, almost definitely! So if there isn’t one now, there’ll be one when he gets in, surely.

 

But she said on the news when she was grilled about it that:

 

“Oh, well, the roof was sloped, so we didn’t want to put someone up there.”

 

I mean, [chuckling] it’s the most ridiculous excuse I’ve ever heard!

 

First of all, there was a bunch of other sloped roofs of people on top of people walk on sloped roofs all the time. You work on roofs for a job. You know, [chuckling] people can walk on roofs!

 

Thomas Sewell: I can’t confirm. I know a thing about sloped roofs.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But also what’s ridiculous is, well, even if that was the case, which is ridiculous, but even if that was the case, you could put someone on the ground around the building. The fact they didn’t even do that, … And there’s obviously all the video footage that we’ve seen of people who are around the building that were, like, pointing it out to law enforcement, apparently.

 

Also, apparently this guy came in hours before Trump got on stage and he had a sight [rifle sight] and he was walking around and, basically using the sight to check out all the sniper positions. And the snipers were like:

 

“Hey, there’s some guy down there with a sight, and he’s looking straight at us. Maybe we should go and look at that guy.”

 

And apparently he got stopped, and they’re like:

 

“Oh, he doesn’t have a gun on him. He just has a sight for some reason.”

 

And so they just let him go, which is insane!

 

And then he pops up on the roof. People are notifying law enforcement minutes before he takes the shot. Apparently a cop climbed up there, and he pointed the rifle at him, and he climbed back down. How was there no communications from anyone to say “get the guy off stage”?

 

So the fact that there was no reaction.

 

And then also there was two sniper positions. One was obstructed by a tree, but the other sniper position wasn’t obstructed by a tree, because as soon as a few shots go off, immediately that sniper pops the shooter.

 

So obviously he had a sight on the shooter, so that means., … And he was kind of basically pointing in his direction. You can see in the image before the shots went off. So why didn’t he take the shot earlier? You know, there’s just too many factors for me to just believe that it was just massive incompetence.

 

[11:05]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: I heard one theory that I disagree with, that the sniper on the left was aiming at him, but was possibly uncertain as to whether he had a rifle or not. And obviously was just keeping an eye on this person randomly crawling on the roof. And maybe they thought it was just a teenager just crawling up there for a better view.

 

And then they would have, like a:

 

“Oh, you know, until you can confirm it’s a rifle, to just shoot people randomly at Trump crowds.”

 

That’s bullshit! That’s nonsense! And the two reasons why that’s nonsense is the scope on that rifle that that sniper had was like a six to 20. Like, you would see it clear as day, like it was in the room with you. You’d be able to see the fact that he was armed. You wouldn’t be, like, unsure, like:

 

“Oh, that’s 100 meters away!”

 

It would look like the person was a meter in front of you. Those scopes are that Zoomed in, or have the capacity to zoom in that much. So there’s no way he would have, like, uncertainty as to whether the person had a rifle or not.

 

And secondly, they’re all on comms [communications]. They’re all on comms! They’re all on radio. So the fact that there were police notified that there was a shooter on the roof.

 

I mean, there’s just too much evidence, there’s too many witness statements of people going to the police saying:

 

“Hey, look, there’s a guy with a gun on the roof!”

 

In the two to three minutes before the shooting started. And the idea that that wouldn’t echo through the comms like, yeah, is just absolutely ridiculous! It’s beyond incompetence!

 

So, yeah, I think it was a genuine assassination attempt. I think this libtard was a sincere libtard. Like, I think he was a spiteful mutant freak. Is he potentially got more connections and was potentially groomed by the intelligence services or the Deep State? I think the strongest evidence that there’s something going on behind the scenes and it’s not just a disgruntled libtard, that it is an organised assassination attempt, is the shorting of the stocks.

 

The fact that that Austin private equity group shorted something, like, I think they tried to short $370 million worth of stock. Or that’s the profit they would have made, …

 

Joel Davis: Of course, they said it was a “clerical error”. They said:

 

“Oh, we accidentally put 10,000 X on the option.”

 

And that’s quite convenient once the bullet misses and everyone’s like:

 

“Hey, what’s going on with this?”

 

So, I mean, I guess it is possible in theory that it could have been an accident, but it’s a very unlucky accident then, because it’s incredibly suspicious!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Everyone’s kind of saying, I don’t normally reply to the chat, unless you guys do your Superchats, but there’s a lot of people in the chat saying that it was “obviously a hoax”. And even the guys that I was at work with today were saying:

 

“Oh, you don’t think it was a blood pact, like it seems too WWE.”

 

And then you started the show with the Hulk Hogan thing, which is funny because it’s like they do the blood packs and the WWE. America is obviously one big giant, you know, reality TV show. And it is a political circus. But is it possible for it to all be a complete hoax? Yeah, absolutely! Just like every other shooting and mass shooting that Alex Jones got in trouble talking about.

 

I remember seeing all the YouTube videos breaking that down. There were people that said that they, that thing that happened in New Zealand was a hoax and that it was CGI. And there’s all these other reasons why they think it was a hoax. There’s no bullet holes, and why did the magazine get on the floor?

 

You know, I do agree that there’s a lot of around Port Arthur, there’s a lot of bullshit, and that that probably was like Mossad, or a setup.

 

But in this case, we’ve got so many cameras, so much footage. It’s not 1996. It’s like a Trump rally. And that bullet, those bullets flew through the crowd and hit people and killed a fire-fighter. Jesus sees.

 

Joel Davis: The image where you can see the, it’s not the bullet, but it’s whatever they call, like the wake behind the bullet.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, yeah. Like the gases or something. Yeah, like the, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, like the air displacement.

 

But also, what also doesn’t make sense is the motive. Like, Trump was already up in the polls like, two days before the assassination attempt. News was breaking in America that all these big jewish donors were pulling out from Biden, putting pressure on Biden to step down. And that pressure’s only increased with conflicting reports coming out today about:

 

“Biden’s going to step down!”

 

And people from Biden’s team saying:

 

“No, he isn’t! This is bullshit!”

 

And people are trying to move against him in the Democrat party to make him step down.

 

So the Democrat party are a total mess. And Trump did what? Like the debate, he didn’t necessarily do too well in the debate with Biden, but Biden was horrible! We covered it on the show saying:

 

“Well, it looks like Trump.”

 

We’ve been saying it for weeks:

 

“Looks like Trump’s going to win!”

 

He seems he’s way ahead in all the swing states and all the polling in the swing states. He’s got all the momentum. Biden’s a spent force. All these, all these people are coalescing behind Trump. Elon Musk has officially endorsed Trump and a lot of other big donors, jewish donors coming behind Trump. Israel seems to want Trump, or at least a large portion of the Israel lobby wants Trump. So it does seem like there’s a lot of elite support behind him and coalescence behind him in general.

 

[16:29]

 

 

So why would you need to stage an assassination attempt in order to., … It was a desperate situation where they needed to flip the election or change perception or anything. I don’t think this will actually have too much of an effect on the polls. I don’t think there’s a lot of people that were previously going to vote Biden that were like:

 

“Oh, well, they almost shot Trump. Now I’m going to completely switch my political allegiance!”

 

It’s not one of those. It’s one of those things that galvanises your own supporters, but they were going to vote for you anyway. So to me, it doesn’t really make any sense.

 

Like the Port Arthur thing, that shooting enabled laws to be passed that completely changed gun law, like completely disarmed Australians, or the Sandy Hook thing or whatever. I don’t know too much about the Sandy Hook shooting, but if you were going to say that was staged, well, you can see a motive. There was momentum at the time in America to do assault rifle bans and so on, and there was a lot of tension between the gun rights people and the Left. So that was under Obama, right? Obama kind of was going after the guns.

 

So you can kind of see there being a political purpose to those shootings. And it’s not like assassination attempts are rare in American political history. There was an assassination attempt on Reagan. There was an assassination attempt on Nixon. There was obviously a successful assassination of JFK.

 

Thomas Sewell: And his brother, …

 

Joel Davis: Then you got McKinley going back in history, Abraham Lincoln. Like, multiple US presidents have been assassinated in history.

 

So the idea that they would do an assassination attempt, it’s not exactly this outlandish, far fetched thing is actually par for the course in American politics. So it’s not like Trump doesn’t have anyone that hates him or anyone powerful that’s against him. You could say:

 

“Yeah, he’s gotten a decent portion of the elite on his side in comparison to 2016 when he first ran.”

 

But there’s still obviously a lot of powerful actors that don’t like him. And it’s almost a desperate situation where it makes more sense that you would take him out because he seemed like he was inevitable to win the election, even more so now, I guess. But it seemed inevitable. Biden was a total mess. There’s no obvious replacement. He’s already the nominee, or the presumptive nominee for the Democrats have already had their primary.

 

So it’s a real mess to try and replace Biden with anyone else. And they can’t just sub in Kamala Harris because she polls even worse than Biden.

 

So they’re going to have to bring someone from left field, convince him to step down. It’s then they’re going to have to do this shoehorn campaign the last four months. You know, it just seems impossible for them to really beat Trump.

 

So the idea of:

 

“Fuck, we’ve got to take him out because we can’t beat him and he’s going to become president.”

 

That actually is more plausible. You know, people could say:

 

“Well the system seems to have suffered on Trump. He’s beaten a lot of these legal cases. The Supreme Court ruled in his favour. All these jewish donors flipped, supporting him and so on.”

 

And that’s all true. But just because certain portions of the elite flip, there could be disgruntled elites that are really upset about that, where maybe they’re upset that he’s going to pull out, he’s going to end the war in Ukraine.

 

There was a theory that Fuentes put forward that:

 

“Oh, well, the jews, like Israel, are trying to take him out, because then he’d be replaced by Nikki Haley or DeSantis or something.”

 

And they’d be even more pro-Israel than Trump now that Biden is falling apart they don’t need Trump to beat Biden and they’re getting Biden out. Maybe they think they could take Trump out and Biden out and then put two more Zionist shills in place, both of them, or something.

 

And I didn’t really buy that. It was an interesting theory. I don’t really buy that. I think it’s a bit too convoluted. It seems like Trump has really got Israel behind him. So I don’t think they would take him out.

 

But, no, it’s kind of hard to establish exactly who would have done it, but we know that someone could have done it. It is interesting to speculate, but there’s no real obvious theory for who set him up or who, if it was a setup. But it does look. Fuck! It does look like a setup! Like, it looks real. It looks really implausible that it’s just a kind of, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Whatever it is, the Secret Service in on it, 100%. Whoever’s behind it, the Secret Service, are working with them closely. Because they did not provide adequate security, like, beyond incompetence! Very nefarious.

 

But, yeah. Is there anything else you want to cover on that subject? It’s definitely been a talking point for most people during the week.

 

Basically every normie that I crossed paths with, you know, every family member, just. Everyone was just talking to me about the Trump assassination:

 

“Oh, did you hear what happened?”

 

Like, of course.

 

[20:53]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I mean, it was quite interesting, I think. What made it interesting as well was the kind of sense of the almost, like, mystical fate, you could read into it that:

 

“Oh, like, he’s basically supposed to be dead, but there was, like some superhuman force that intervened.”

 

I mean, he himself was saying that.

 

Of course he would say that. And I’ve speculated as to, like, what that could be because I am a bit of a mystic in how I see the world. I know you are as well. I’m not like, a pure rationalist. I do believe in God. I do believe in supernatural forces. But it isn’t so much that I think:

 

“Oh, Trump is a great guy!”

 

And obviously, I accept, like, he’s kind of bought out by Zionist interests. He’s really just a conservative. Okay. He’s a maybe a more bombastic! He’s got, like, kind of machismo energy and so on. He’s a polarizing figure. Differentiates himself with his popular style and charisma from other conservative politicians. But his policies, they aren’t particularly radical, let’s say.

 

And so I don’t see it as so much like his political agenda, getting into power is destined by God, but more almost that he’s supposed to get in power perhaps for some alternative reason, that some crisis is on the horizon. We’ve talked about in the show before. The potential for war with China. There’s also the potential for war in the Middle East. Obviously, Israel is talking about or giving off signs that it’s going to go to war with Hezbollah in Lebanon. Could that end up going beyond that and drag Iran in? There could be a lot of political pressure in the United States to go at Iran, particularly with a Trump-Vance administration and a Republican Congress and Senate, which looks like what we’re going to get. And they’re all owned by AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee], except for one guy, basically.

 

Thomas Sewell: These leads out of the Trump assassination. I thought it was very strange, very suspicious. And I’m sure this has been mentioned before that within, what, one day, within two days of being subject to an attempted assassination, he picks a VP, that was, … I’d honestly never, oh, I think I’ve heard of him once, but he honestly wasn’t on my radar as a VP pick.

 

And one of the first observations that I saw on Twitter was people saying:

 

“Of the top five potential VP picks, they were all Indian or Indian adjacent.”

 

And there was a list. Vance, who’s married to an Indian, and a whole bunch of other, you know, part Indian or full Indians that are sort of big.

 

Joel Davis: Nikki Haley, Vivek Ramaswamy.

 

Thomas Sewell: Vivek. Yeah. There was a couple others on there that I noticed and recognised their names.

 

Joel Davis: One of them was Tim Scott, who’s black.

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, really? Okay. I didn’t see that one on the list, but, okay. The majority of the list of the VP picks were Indian or Indian adjacent.

 

And I was saying recently to the guys that this is just basic geopolitics, this is basic strategy. This is thousands of years old, if you consider what comes next.

 

And I think this adds more weight, more credence to the fact that we’re going to be going to war with China, Iran and Russia. And that they’re trying to get India on side.

 

And that’s why our countries have been flooded for the last twelve months with Indians, obviously for the last decade. But really, especially in the last twelve to 24 months, Canada, the United States and Australia have been completely flooded with Indians.

 

And then we see who are the vice president picks. Well, it’s not a traditional marriage in that sense. But thousands of years ago, if you were going to go to war with one tribe and you needed to make an ally really quickly, you would marry one of your sons or one of your daughters to that ally tribe to confirm the alliance. And obviously, Trump’s already done that. He’s married all his children to jews, except Barron.

 

And obviously Biden’s done that. He’s married all his children to jews.

 

But in the absence of marrying your children to the “greatest ally” or their masters, I should say, certainly picking a VP that has an Indian background or is Indian adjacent is going to help secure a geopolitical alliance with Indians in general. Because it’s like:

 

“Well, you’re on the boat, you know what I mean?”

 

Well, not the deportation boat, but “you’re in the camp”, so to speak.

 

It’s like we’re intertwining the blood. Which is the ultimate, …

 

Joel Davis: What we saw, what we saw from Trump the other day as well. There was a clip, he went on a podcast that was, apparently, it was set up by Vance, by the way, that appearance where a few weeks ago, where he went on and said:

 

“Oh, you know, yeah, we can’t have illegal immigration, but we want people to come legally. And like all these people that are coming to America and going to our universities, we’ve got to staple green cards onto the diplomas. We’ve got to get the high quality, university educated immigrants rather than these illegal immigrants. We’re going to deport the illegal immigrants.”

 

And so what I said was:

 

“Well, you’re just trying to swap out the Mexicans for pajeets!”

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, exactly. Exactly!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

[26:02]

 

Thomas Sewell: And this is part of a broader geopolitical strategy for US foreign policy and western foreign policy, that we’re going to start allying ourselves further and further with India in order to break up BRICs. In order to get India out of that Russia, China, Iran sort of relationship.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. India is the easiest one to peel away because India has hostility with Pakistan, who are obviously allied with a lot of the other Islamic States and hate Israel. India’s got a good relationship with Israel. India also has a massive geopolitically with China and a historical relationship to the Anglos.

 

Obviously, we colonised them. They all speak English, … So yeah, they’re the obvious easiest pick.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Well, that’s another thing. If we go to war with Iran and the Middle East again, it potentially, like, Pakistan was not., … Although on paper, Pakistan was an ally in our war against Iraq and Afghanistan, they weren’t! And anyone within the state knows that they weren’t actually an ally. They were a puppet government in place, but they were actively undermining the effort. And they were helping the Afghanis, they’re helping the Taliban.

 

And I think they were hiding Osama as well, if you want to believe that Osama was still alive or is dead or whatever your theory is. I mean, obviously, everyone’s got a different take on that, but who cares?

 

What’s important is that if we go to war with the Middle East again, in general, we go to war with Iran, it has a strong chance of dragging the rest of them in. And that could drag in Pakistan. And obviously, India, as you said before, India and Pakistan arena a very long feud, and they’re like arch nemesis of each other.

 

Joel Davis: So Pakistan is also allied with China. Very well allied with China now.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Because they got the “One Belt One Road”* through Pakistan and Afghanistan now. Yeah. So it’s all coming to fruition. Putin talks about a multipolar world, and obviously, that’s one of the most common talking points now.

 

[* OBOR is a Chinese project that aims to improve connectivity and co-operation among 78 countries in Asia, Africa, and Europe. It involves building roads, railways, ports, pipelines, and other infrastructure projects to boost China’s domestic growth and economic diplomacy.]

 

But it’s not looking like there’s going to be too many polls. It’s kind of like a new, it’s just like a dual polar world that just hasn’t quite formed yet, but is in the process where we’re looking at a new Cold War, and we’ve got a new set of allies.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course. And it’s pretty much the same boundaries as the first Cold War, except we have more of Europe on our side now, geographically.

 

Thomas Sewell: The third world is more developed now.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: And they’re more able to mobilise.

 

Joel Davis: China is more dominant. Russia is the junior partner, whereas it was the opposite way around, obviously, in the original Cold War. That’s definitely a factor.

 

So the JD Vance pick wasn’t a surprise to me, actually, credit to Nick Fuentes. He said on a podcast months ago, he’s like:

 

“JD Vance will be the pick. I heard it on good authority.”

 

So that proves that Nick obviously has [chuckling] a little bit of inside baseball. He called it like, months ago, and he’s been really pushing hard against it and pre-emptively criticising it because he views Vance as basically a, …

 

Thomas Sewell: He’s very Zionist, isn’t he?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. As an extension of the Yoram Hazony led National Conservatism clique. Yoram Hazony* is a jew, an Israeli citizen, although I think he might have, I don’t know if he was born in Israel or America, but I think he went to university in America, but he’s an Israeli citizen. And National Conservatism was kind of astroturfed into existence after Trump got elected as an attempt by, … And also, they’re very well connected, I should say, in Europe. The National Conservatism conferences in Europe, all the big kind of populist Right parties and their leadership from a lot of these European countries like people like Giorgia Meloni from Italy and so on.

 

[* Yoram Hazony is an Israeli-American philosopher, Bible scholar, and political theorist. He is president of the Herzl Institute in Jerusalem and serves as the chairman of the Edmund Burke Foundation and president of the Herzl Institute. His 2018 book, The Virtue of Nationalism, established Hazony as one of the leading proponents of a new kind of “national conservatism.”]

 

They speak at their conferences and they’ll talk about immigration. They won’t necessarily talk about it in terms of race, though. They talk about in terms of “culture” and in terms of “history” and just ways in which you can define a nation anyway but through ethnic terms. Although in Europe, they are a little bit more ethno-nationalist in their rhetoric, but in America, not so much.

 

And Hazony, actually, I flicked through one of his books, and Hazony kind of defines America and Europe differently. He’s almost willing to concede a little bit of ethnic nationalism to the European countries, but denies it to the United States. Which makes sense from a jewish perspective. Because the jews don’t necessarily need to be included in Dutch or French nationalism in the same way they need to be included within American nationalism, because America is the power centre. That’s the hotbed of jewish power. That’s where the majority of the jews are. That’s where all the key decisions get made. And so defining America as:

 

“Yes, yes, we care about defending European cultures and so on, but America, America’s different. America’s a nation about freedom and Christianity and so on! And it’s a multiracial country and always was because the blacks were there, et cetera.”

 

And that gives the jews more security, have been included within the identity of the state. Right?

 

So anyway, he has been very much promoted. And then he is connected to Peter Thiel. Peter Thiel is from what they call the “PayPal Mafia”, which also includes Elon Musk, the initial investors in PayPal. Peter Thiel is a massive billionaire, very influential in American Right-wing politics. He actually funded JD Vance into the Senate, so he funded his political career into existence. JD Vance was a venture capitalist originally. And Peter Thiel owns Palantir. And Palantir is the number one software contractor to the US Department of Defense.

 

So he’s very much plugged into the American military industrial complex. He was also one of the first investors in Facebook.

 

Now Facebook, if you look at the history of Facebook in the 1990s, there was a project by DARPA, which is an extension of the American military, like a kind of research and development wing of the US military. They basically developed Facebook in the late nineties and the early two thousands.

 

And then when they closed down the programme that developed a Facebook like product, immediately, the next day, Facebook goes public and, like, it’s launched. And it’s the exact same day. So it’s quite obvious that they basically develop Facebook.

 

And you can see why the American government want to develop Facebook, because it’s a way of, well, rather than having to spy on everyone, you can just create Facebook and they’ll just give you all their information for free, right? And they’ll have fun doing it.

 

So anyway, obviously, Mark Zuckerberg was brought in to head that up. But Peter Thiel was tapped on the shoulder and said:

 

“Hey, you might want to throw some money in this.”

 

That’s kind of how it works with these DARPA projects. They created Google as well. They’ll create a lot of these big tech companies. They’ll basically create all the primary infrastructure. And then they’ll go and bring in some jewish investors and say, or other elite investors that are connected to their networks and say:

 

“Throw your money in here!”

 

And then they become billionaires. And obviously, the jews who run Google, that happened.

 

Now, Peter Thiel not only became a billionaire, he’s a member of the steering committee of the Bilderberg group. This guy is fucking connected! You know what I mean? And Peter Thiel, actually, his career started. He said:

 

“Oh, I went to Stanford. I left Stanford.”

 

He went and worked for a law firm in New York. I can’t remember the name of the law firm. I apologise. But that law firm is a well known CIA front group. And then he worked there for like, six months. And he’s like:

 

“Oh, I didn’t really work out being a lawyer, so I decided to move back to California and become a venture capitalist. And then I made a couple of investments. And I just was one of the first people ever to invest in PayPal and Facebook.”

 

“And then they just blew up and became like billion dollar companies. And now I’m a billionaire. And now I run Palantir, the number one software contractor to the US Department of Defense. And now I’m funding vice presidents into existence and I’m on the steering committee of Bilderberg!”

 

That doesn’t happen by accident. People don’t go from just being a nobody to becoming someone like that. And he’s obviously well connected with Elon Musk.

 

And apparently news reports came out that Elon Musk, because he just donated like $50 million to the Trump campaign and officially endorsed Trump. And it kind of seemed like:

 

“Oh, he’s just reacting to the Trump assassination attempt.”

 

But no, it came out that it was conditional on, yes, Vance getting picked.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I heard that after the fact, that Musk was big on JD Vance. And it looks like Trump has gone from draining the swamp to ingratiating the swamp. You know, the swamp is right there as his right hand man.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but what’s interesting about Thiel, because you can watch a lot of his lectures on YouTube because he fans as himself as a bit of an intellectual. He was a very close associate of Mencius Moldbug, also known as Curtis Yarvin*, who’s a big jewish political blogger. And he goes on all these podcasts and so on.

 

[* Curtis Guy Yarvin (born 1973), also known by the pen name Mencius Moldbug, is a jewish-American blogger. He is known, along with philosopher Nick Land, for founding the anti-egalitarian and anti-democratic philosophical movement known as the Dark Enlightenment or Neo-reactionary movement.]

 

He actually went on Tucker Carlson show. He invented so-called “Neo-reaction”. And he’s quite popular in kind of like nerdy, esoteric Right-wing theory cell circles. So I’ve been aware of him for a long time because that’s kind of my forte. But he is a very close associate, he’s kind of the court jew of Peter Thiel.

 

So that’s quite interesting. And Peter Thiel, if you look at his statements, he had this one lecture that I remember watching where he said:

 

“During the Cold War, 1950s and the 1960s in particular, when there was this threat of global nuclear annihilation and World War III.”

 

He said:

 

“That was when you have the fastest development in the American tech sector, where they’re creating the space programme and they’re inventing computers and computing technology, and all this incredible technology is coming out of the United States.”

 

He said:

 

“Why is that?”

 

He’s like:

 

“Well, because we’re at war and were competing technologically with another superpower. The existential imperative on all of America’s best and brightest was not just, ‘oh, I want to create new technology because that’s my job or because I want to make money’. It was, ‘we have to create the technology before the Russians do so that we can stay ahead’ because it’s, like, existentially necessary to protect the free world from collapse, falling to communism.”

 

“We have to prove that liberal democracy and the West is the best!”

 

And he said:

 

“Then once the Cold War Peters out, then you get stagnation in American society.”

 

And he says:

 

“With war with China on the horizon, and maybe that can change. Maybe the tech sector can be re energized by structural competition against China, kind of existential competition.”

 

So he’s been talking about the threat of China war with China for a very long time. So that kind of plays into the whole idea that the US tech sector that’s connected to the Military-Industrial Complex*, they are very much anti-China.

 

[* The expression Military–Industrial Complex (MIC) describes the relationship between a country’s military and the defense industry that supplies it, seen together as a vested interest which influences public policy. A driving factor behind the relationship between the military and the defense-minded corporations is that both sides benefit—one side from obtaining weapons, and the other from being paid to supply them. Wikipedia]

 

[37:10]

 

 

And you can see, like Tucker Carlson, who associates with that clique and has interviewed a lot of people from that clique. He’s a China hawk, but then he’s against war with Russia and Ukraine. He criticises the Ukraine war, but also says:

 

“We should be focusing on China!”

 

All the time. And there’s other elements of the US defense establishment, foreign policy establishment that are aligned with the Right or this clique on the Right that are saying the same thing.

 

So the whole pushing of the pro-Putin, pro-Russia thing on the Right, that’s part of it’s more like:

 

“Well, we can’t be committed here and in China at the same time. We should be redirecting our forces to Taiwan, pulling out for that reason.”

 

So there’s, I think, a complex kind of almost, like, struggle within American elites. There’s, like, these legacy American elites that are committed to, like, NATO and are committed to, … And they’re more on the left. They’re committed to the project of global liberal democracy:

 

“Everywhere must become a liberal democracy. We must extend liberalism into Russia!”

 

And so on.

 

And then you’ve got this more realist tech elite that has aligned itself with Trump and the Right, that also is aligned with the Zionists who say:

 

“Well, protect Israel. But other than that, really everything should be focused on China.”

 

And even some of them might even be saying:

 

“We don’t even want to even get too involved in the Middle East to protect Israel. We’ll do the bare minimum to keep Israel happy. But China’s really the big threat.”

 

So that all, I think, fits together into what Vance represents, I think, as a pick, which is, yeah, China, Hawking, basically.

 

Thomas Sewell: Mmm. Very interesting stuff. Entering a new Cold War, perhaps. You know, it might not go hot, but we’re definitely gearing up for war with China. And if it doesn’t go hot soon, China will plan to just wait us out. Because they believe that our society, I think from the top down, I’m talking about China here. China believes from the top down that our society is just on the brink of collapse.

 

And I guess it is on the brink of civil war, and we are collapsing. And I guess their main theory is just to just slowly, creepily, encroach on the borders. And obviously, they’ve got some pretty interesting, you know, Rubicons or whatever to cross, like Taiwan, or Taiwan Strait, for that matter.

 

But also there’s smaller ones. And if I recall in the cold War, the first Cold War with Russia, although we never directly went to war with Russia, we went, or the Soviet Union, we went to war in a lot of places which were contested ground.

 

So perhaps the next 30 or 40 years, we could be seeing maybe not outright war with China and with Taiwan, but we see a lot of smaller wars that might not be beneficial to us, but would be in places like Fiji. I know that the Chinese are trying to expand into the islands way south of their region of control. And they’re pushing their influence around in Micronesia and in, …

 

Joel Davis: The Solomon islands.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah the Solomon Islands and stuff, not just Micronesia in general, just all those islands.

 

And obviously in Africa, we could see some serious conflicts in Africa. I’m not so sure about South America. I don’t know how much influence the Chinese really have over there, but certainly that’s another player.

 

Joel Davis: Brazil seems contested ground.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Okay. Well, that’s a good point, because it’s politically very unstable, because you’ve basically got a 21st century version of the kind of Spanish or Argentinian dichotomy. And obviously, there’s always been strong national fascist roots in South America, but also very strong communist roots in South America, obviously stemming from the two major different populations, the Amerindians and the either Portuguese or Spanish.

 

And obviously in Brazil, you’ve also got huge Italian and German populations there as well, that primarily or almost entirely vote for Bolsonaro.

 

But, yeah, you’ve got some pretty radical communist politics and proto-fascist, or not proto-fascist, but neo-Fascist politics emerging out of the conservative scenes everywhere, all over the world. So as we’ve all theorized before, all politics, all liberal democracies, is really caught between a rock and a hard place, and that’s fascism and communism, or National Socialism and communism. If it’s an ethno-state or attempting to be an ethno-state.

 

So, yeah, the fire rises!

 

Joel Davis: And during the Cold War, the United States was a lot more, was willing to bend its rules with its allies. You know, it was allied with what a lot of people consider to be a fascist regime in Spain, in France and Spain. And that didn’t really become Democratised fully until, like the eighties. Portugal, Salazars, Portugal, similar story. There was basically a fascist coup backed by the Americans in Chile in the 1970s. South Korea was effectively a fascist state for the first half of the Cold War.

 

And ultimately, as they won, and particularly after they won, they were able to enforce liberal democracy on all of their allies.

 

But while they were still fighting communism, they had to kind of bend the rules a little bit. And there was a lot of rationalisation. Like Hannah Arendt, who was a jewish political philosopher, she made the argument:

 

“Well, there’s totalitarianism and authoritarianism. And authoritarianism is bad, but it’s not as bad as totalitarianism, which is like the Nazis or the Soviet Union. So if we have to ally with authoritarian states against totalitarian states, that it’s ultimately the Liberal thing to do.”

 

So you could start to see these kinds of copes come in. And that’s what’s interesting about the Curtis Yarvin court jew. I mean, Peter Thiel seems to have a bit of jewish ancestry. He’s not like a pure jew, but he seems to have a bit of jewish ancestry from what I remember. He’s also a homosexual, by the way. A very strange individual.

 

[43:05]

 

 

But Curtis Yarvin represents a way of criticising:

 

“Oh, maybe democracy actually kind of sucks and monarchy is better.”

 

But he doesn’t do it from the perspective of our perspective, where he’s talking about the volk or anything like that. He does it from just like:

 

“Oh, from the perspective of how do you make government run smoothly and how do you ensure freedom?”

 

So the idea is like well, usually a lot of the tech sector people like Elon Musk and so on, they were libertarians. Libertarianism and kind of tech bro ism have always been kind of associated.

 

But obviously, libertarianism is a totally kind of bankrupt ideology because it doesn’t have any real concept of how to wield power. It’s always just like:

 

“How do you, like, break down the state as much as possible?”

 

And obviously, that’s a totally failed mission, and it’s never really succeeded anywhere that has been tried. And what they came to realise was, well, you look at the work of someone like Hans Hermann Hopper, who was an anarcho-capitalist libertarian type, but who was also sympathetic to monarchism and argue that monarchy actually provides more freedom than democracy, because if you have a secure centralised power, it’s a different incentive structure.

 

So if you have a democracy, well, then you’re going to have more socialism, because then if you want to get the pleb votes, you’re going to have to basically offer to spend the government’s money on a whole series of social programs to win their votes and transfer wealth from the rich to the poor. And so democracy incentivises a larger and larger state, and grows the state, and intervenes a lot in the economy.

 

And so if you want to have a state that doesn’t do that as much, you would rather have more of a dictatorship. And you could see the kind of Chile under Pinochet was kind of like that. It was like this libertarian fascism combination. Dictatorship.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, this. How do you pronounce his name? Bukell. Buchel. BUELE.

 

Joel Davis: Bukele. In El Salvador.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, he’s like a little mini dictator. He’s doing really well. Yeah, yeah. In a good way.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. No, he seems to have done, yeah, he seems really cleaned up the country.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, he’s a straight up [word unclear]

 

Joel Davis: The guy who got elected president in Argentina, Millet. He’s like a libertarian, but at the same time, …

 

Thomas Sewell: He’s a libertarian clown. Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But he’s also, like, willing to work with the global establishment, particularly. He’s aligned himself with the America and like, Elon Musk is over there meeting with him:

 

“How great is this guy?”

 

So it’s part of that same clique. Bolsonaro seems to have been supported by that clique, but he got defeated by Lula, I think his name is, who’s like a communist. And he’s allied with the Chinese and the Russians.

 

Thomas Sewell: He’s like Bernie Sanders on steroids, that guy.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. So you could see like this new kind of dichotomy and the kind of Atlanticist global liberalism elite represented by Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden and so on, that seems to be falling by the wayside. And this new kind of Americana, Pax Americana, new Cold War ideology seems to be rising. And that’s kind of what Trumpism seems to represent now, like to kind of build into this larger theme about what this means for the world.

 

So that’s quite interesting because it seems like Australia is like, the slowest to react to all of these developments. We still have the old form of politics. We don’t have this, like, rising Right-wing populist movement. Yeah. Like, Albanese seems to be of the ilk of the Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden era.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: And that seems to be, I think that’ll gradually kind of melt away. I remember you talking about on this show when we first started doing it, you were talking about analyzing the Joe Rogan podcast because your mates at work would listen to Joe Rogan, and you were noticing Joe Rogan pivot where he was a little bit more Left leaning and he started going really hard against, quote, unquote, “wokeness” and kind of pivoting more to the Right-wing.

 

Thomas Sewell: He called it, the “new centre”. Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I think that basically is the cultural shift.

 

Thomas Sewell: Tech bro, libertarian mixed with., … Yeah, like, it’s aware of what’s going on in China. It’s anti-woke, but it’s pro, kind of degeneracy. It’s kind of this weird blend of yeah, … It’s like, let me smoke weed and shoot guns, but also, like, trannies are bad!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, trannies are bad. But who cares about gay marriage and abortion?

 

That’s what’s interesting as well. At this Republican National Convention that happened this week, it was basically gay marriage was put into the Republican Party platform officially. The Trumps have killed a lot of the anti-abortion momentum. And a lot of racists who aren’t Christians think that’s actually a good thing because abortion disproportionately basically culls the black population in the United States.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, it is natural law. No, it is natural selection.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but the reason why Trump wants to, … I don’t know if Trump is a crypto racist trying to cull the blacks., …

 

Thomas Sewell: Nah, I don’t think he’s coming from that angle.

 

Joel Davis: He’s looking at it electorally.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: It’s just unpopular. He knows that there’s a whole bunch of women that will come out to vote for their abortion rights, that if you don’t touch them, they might stay home or maybe they’ll vote for you.

 

And I think that he’s just looking at it like that.

 

[48:48]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s the Stacy vote. There’s like a Stacy form of feminism. There’s like pretty girl feminism, like, obviously there’s ugly girl feminism. And they’re like the dysgenic freaks and they’re all fat, retarded and shaved their heads and they want abortion so they can in theory, if they got pregnant, kill their children.

 

Whereas, Stacey feminism is like, there’s hot chicks want to degrade women around them so that they look more hot. So, like, they’re the ultimate, like, women haters.

 

And so all the, like, hot chicks, they’ll congratulate and they’ll like people’s pictures on Facebook or Instagram if they’ve done something stupid. And they’ll be like:

 

“Oh, your new haircut looks so great!”

 

And it’s like, Stacey bullying, feminism, nationalism. And, yeah, you see that a lot. You see that a lot in these kind of Red states where these women are, like, conservative. They’ve got three or four kids. They live in a nice home, but they’re pro-abortion.

 

And it’s like:

 

“But you never had an abortion. You had all your children.”

 

And it’s like:

 

“Yeah, but what about other women? They’ll want an abortion.”

 

It’s like:

 

“Yeah, you want other women to kill their kids! You just want your kids.”

 

It’s a very strange form of, when you think about it from a natural selection perspective, it’s like, they want the loser chicks to kill their genes so that only the Stacy’s have kids. And, yeah, you see that a lot.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. It’s also a big factor with the Latina vote, because the Latinas love their abortions, even though they’re all Catholics, because they’re also all [word unclear], and their baby daddies aren’t necessarily hanging around a lot of the time. So the Latina vote can really get mobilised through if Republicans touch abortions.

 

Otherwise, you know what’s interesting about America is that Latinos and Latinas, I think they’re almost, they’re more than double the black population, but they basically get the same amount of black votes as you get Hispanic votes, because a lot of them just aren’t that engaged with politics, which makes sense because they aren’t really a heritage population of the United States. So they don’t have the same ties to the United States and its political culture as blacks and Whites do. Blacks obviously have a racial grievance that really motivates them, particularly black women. Black women all vote. Black men are usually too lazy to vote. That’s kind of what also makes the whole Trump strategy of trying to appeal to the black male vote. It’s like, yeah, in opinion polls, a bunch of black guys will be like:

 

“Yeah, I like Trump!”

 

But then when it comes to election day and they have to get out of bed and, like, not start sipping on a 40, but actually get down to a polling booth and like pull a lever. It’s like:

 

“Oh, man! Like, I don’t, I forgot, it’s just I was eating, you know, sipping some syrup and eating some fried chicken and shit!”

 

And like:

 

“Oh, fuck! I mean, I guess I didn’t vote for Trump!”

 

So but whereas the black woman, Locquious, will be getting down there to vote for Joe Biden because Trump’s an evil, mean racist. Anyway, the point is, yeah. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: You can see it as well. You can see them like, it’s their form of yeah, … It’s like all social justice.

 

Joel Davis: But anyway, the I thought that was interesting, though, to notice that, yeah, Trump is going hard on., … I remember I actually saw Eric Trump, one of Trump’s sons, get interviewed and they were like:

 

“Eric, why is Trump, basically changing his stance on abortion and gay marriage?”

 

And he’s like:

 

“Well, wait a second! He actually never opposed gay marriage!”

 

Which is true. Trump was the first ever US president to run on supporting gay marriage. Or to be fair, I think Clinton also ran on supporting it, but Obama did only flipped to supporting it after he was re-elected a couple of years before the end of his second term. That’s obviously an indication of the larger cultural trends. Obviously, Obama’s actually a crypto faggot and so on. So I’m sure he always supported gay marriage in spirit, but just waited till it was politically expedient.

 

But the point remains that Trump was never opposed to gay marriage, but he was a little bit more pro-life in the first term.

 

And I think that was just trying to appeal to the Republicans. And then I think he made the adjustment based upon recent developments, like the Dobbs decision overturning Roe vs Wade. And there was a reaction by, as I said, the Latinas came out to vote Blue in the last midterms or whatever, and so he made the adjustment.

 

But the point is that Eric Trump was like:

 

“But we’ve got to focus on other issues like immigration.”

 

And that’s interesting. Like, they’ll put immigration front and centre and they’re letting a lot of the Christian, early Trump, 2016-20, like President Trump was a lot more explicitly Christian. He would reference Jesus Christ a lot. Today I watched his speech, or a significant portion of his speech, and he was talking about how God saved him and so on, but he didn’t mention Jesus Christ once. Which I found interesting. And the whole tone of the whole RNC, they had the Sikh woman doing some weird prayer.

 

Thomas Sewell: That was very strange.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And again, that is more for the Indian alliance. That was all to do with, that was like a Indian alliance ritual. Like:

 

“See, we’re doing it at our conventions!”

 

[53:57]

 

 

Joel Davis: Why wouldn’t they do the Hindu thing? It’s almost like, that’s almost dumb from, even from that standpoint because like, there’s the whole Khalistan* issue and Sikh-Hindu tensions and so on.

 

[* The Khalistan movement is a separatist movement seeking to create a homeland for Sikhs by establishing an ethno‐religious sovereign state called Khalistan in the Punjab region.]

 

Thomas Sewell: I don’t know the exact demographics of the Indians that are in the United States. So maybe that’s relevant to that. Maybe there’s a higher percentage of Sikhs than Hindus or disproportionate.

 

Joel Davis: It probably is, because I think the Sikhs as a minority, I think they try to, …

 

Thomas Sewell: High income earners. Yeah, they’re high income earners as well.

 

Joel Davis: Like, there’s a decent amount of them that come here. Yeah, they seem to be disproportionate. Like, obviously, the majority of the Indians that come here are Hindus, but, yeah, more Sikhs than the percentage of the total Indian population do come here. And probably similar to America. I know that’s probably true for Canada as well.

 

But my point being, it was kind of like this:

 

“Perennialist Freemason, all religions are legitimate and they all worship the same God, and we respect all faiths as, whether you’re Muslim or Christian or Hindu or whatever, jewish, it’s all the same.”

 

You know, it had that tone. And I think that actually comports with how a lot of contemporary people think. The majority of Americans they’ll tick the Christian box, but they aren’t like hard, doctrinaire Christians because they’ll tick the Christian box, but also they want to have abortions and they’re pretty gay, and they have a bunch of friends that have different religious views and they don’t really get that offended by it.

 

And so they’re kind of this neo-perennialist. It’s not really a religion, but it’s kind of this new agey, neo-perennialist kind of worldview, basically. And that seems to kind of, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Globalism. Globalism is probably the primary worldview.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: So it’s all get along to get along.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s part of it. But it seems, because there’s like those famous clips of where they asked Trump what is what his favourite Bible verse was? And he’s like:

 

“Well there’s just so many good ones. I can’t tell you one.”

 

And they were kind of like:

 

“You don’t know one Bible verse?”

 

He’s like:

 

“No, no, there’s just so many!”

 

And they’re like:

 

“You know what’s your favourite Testament? Old Testament or New Testament?”

 

He’s like:

 

“Well, you know, about the same. They’re both great. They’re both fantastic! I always say that the Art of the Deal is my second favourite book behind the Bible!”

 

He has this, like, he’s kind of acting like as if he’s never read the Bible in his life. It’s quite funny.

 

Anyway, the point is he kind of showed that he had this almost like fake Christianity. Like, I remember they asked him once if he prayed to. And he said:

 

“No, I don’t need to pray. I don’t believe in praying.”

 

They’re like:

 

“What do you mean, you’re a Christian?”

 

He’s like:

 

“I don’t believe in that.”

 

It’s just like:

 

“I’m a winner. I don’t need to pray. I just get what I want!”

 

Kind of thing. It’s kind of funny!

 

Thomas Sewell: [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Kind of [chuckling] had the attitude, typical Trump shit! I’m actually trying to pull it up because it’s a pretty funny clip.

 

But the point is that, yeah, he kind of has always had this kind of disingenuous kind of American political Christianity, which he is seemingly happy to drop. And the same thing with the pro-life stuff.

 

And it seems like even though there is a vocal minority of very devout Christians in American politics that are more influential than in a lot of other Western countries, the same trends of kind of declining church attendance rates and declining faith and declining, … Even people who do go to church or who do profess faith, they’re kind of declining orthodoxy in their doctrinal beliefs. And there’s kind of an adjustment, therefore, that he seems to be precipitating. And he made very clear in his speech:

 

“I’m a leader for all Americans, of all race, colour, creed, whatever!”

 

And so that really does also comport with that Joe Roganist neo-centrism:

 

“We don’t want to be too conservative on any social issue. Like, yeah, the tranny thing is too far, but we don’t want to be too conservative on any social issue because we’re going to exclude an increasingly secular or perennialist multi-religious., …”

 

And also largely, a lot of people are atheists or agnostics:

 

“We don’t want to exclude any of these people. We want to create this big, inclusive, get rid of the illegal immigrants, and civic nationalism.”

 

That all seems to be really coalescing. And that makes sense of what would be popular.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I saw one thing from that porn star or whatever she was that was speaking at the RNC. I think it was just the introduction to her speech. And she said something like:

 

“We don’t care whether you’re gay or straight or White or black.”

 

And basically saying that this is the worldview that she stands up for and it’s the same as Trump and it’s the same as the RNC, and Kumbaya together. And I just thought, this is fucking brilliant! And then I saw that that Shabbos goyim*, or whatever he was.

 

I can’t remember his full name, but I’m pretty sure his name was Shabois. And he was saying.

 

[* A Shabbos goy, Shabbat goy or Shabbes goy is a non-jew who is employed by jews to perform certain types of work that Jewish religious law prohibits a jew from doing on the Shabbat (Friday evening, Saturday). Aka, as a jewish insult, someone who serves the jews.]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, Shabbos.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. And he was saying about how obviously they need to ban anti-semitism, you know, it needs to be illegal.

 

Joel Davis: Kestenbaum.*

 

Thomas Sewell: And it turns out he’s actually a registered Democrat and tweeted about his support for the Democrats, like, a week ago.

 

And so they had a Democrat, a porn star. I’m sure this has all been said before, but for those that aren’t aware of this, yeah, it seems like the RNC convention was the most normal, …

 

[* One of the ‘everyday Americans’ included in Wednesday’s RNC speaker list is recent Harvard grad Shabbos Kestenbaum, who is suing the university over its alleged failure to combat anti-semitism on campus. Wall Street Journal]

 

[59:41]

 

 

Joel Davis: Wasn’t even like a blonde, Americana, big tits porn star. She was a half black, shaved head, bald with face tattoos on her forehead porn star. It was really egregious. And she has clips talking about how Satanism is a logical religion or something that I saw going around.

 

And then, yeah, Kestenbaum, as you said, he tweeted, like, literally ten days ago. I’ll quote him here. @ShabbosK is his Twitter handle. It says here:

 

“I am a Democrat. I spoke out against Russia interference in the 2016 election to sow division and supported policies to combat it. I am begging my party now to immediately do the same with Iran.”

 

And then obviously, he wasn’t getting enough love from the Democrats in his anti-Iran message. So now he’s speaking at the RNC, you know, literally a week later.

 

Thomas Sewell: Incredible!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it is. But that’s par for the course. Remember, like a while ago, they had all the pro-Palestine protests on American college campuses. And then there were, like, these patriotic young White Americans that were lionised by the media, particularly Fox News, for kind of attacking them and hoisting American flags on campus. But, you know, there was, like. I think there was some White frat guys that did it, and the media kind of ignored them.

 

But then there were these jewish frat guys who did it, and then they became, like, turned into superstars and they had their little cameo. And, yeah, there was a lot of cringe.

 

The only element, I would say from the RNC that was cool, other than Hulk Hogan. He liked, ripped. I got to play the Hulk Hogan clip. The Hulk Hogan thing was actually, I love American retardation! I find it, …

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s getting closer and closer to that movie Idiocracy. Every day we’re just getting closer to reality TV.

 

Joel Davis: HH, brother!

 

Hulk Hogan: But what happened last week when they took a shot at my hero! [crowd cheering] And they tried to kill the next president of the United States! Enough was enough! And I said:

“Let Trumpomania run wild, brother! Let Trumpomania rule again! Let Trumpomania Make America Great Again!”

 

Why not do that, instead of that kind of thing? Even me, as, like, a cynical asshole Nazi, I’m like:

 

“Okay, I kind of like it!”

 

Like, that shit’s kind of, … And the Magatards must be cooming at that shit! The Magatards are cooming themselves like crazy! We put the half black porn star up and the Sikh woman singing prayers to some God, I can’t even remember the name of, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Because they’re trying to appeal to everyone.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but go only on Hulkamania, in my opinion. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: You know how Indians can withstand, like, copious amounts of the smell of shit! Americans have a different kind of tolerance for cringe. Americans can just tolerate just immense atomic levels of cringe! Their whole culture is just built on being able to withstand the most amount of cringe! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, [chuckling] yeah. Like, they had a kid rock performance, and I caught a little bit of that they had Dana White from the UFC introduce Trump. And it was quite funny because he was clearly on a shitload of cocaine, because he was just garbling his jaw and licking his lips and, like, his eyes were darting around the room, was yelling into the mic in this kind of bizarre way! [chuckling] Yeah, it was really Murica on the last day. Like, this was like, think day four, but yeah, it was like, over the top woke! Like, even like, shit the Democrats wouldn’t even do on day one. And then day four, they just like, tripled down on, like, Fox News, WWE, UFC, kid rock! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: They threw everything at it, threw everything at it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. This guy, though, was. I thought this was interesting.

 

Thomas Homan: As a guy who spent 34 years deporting illegal aliens, I got a message to the millions of illegal aliens that Joe Biden’s released in our country in violation of federal law. You better start packing now! [crowd cheers] You’re damn right! Because you’re going home!

 

Joel Davis: Anyway. I thought that was kind of interesting.

 

I mean, I would say that’s like, the one good policy. And Trump did mention, like he said in his speech, and he said it before in his rallies, they want to do the largest deportations in world history. They referenced Dwight Eisenhower, his administration, the fifties, Operation Wetback, where they deported, like, one and a half million Mexicans. And he said:

 

“We’re going to, like, smash their record or whatever with all of our deportations!”

 

And you could be cynical and say:

 

“Oh, they’re going to deport all the Mexicans and then bring in pajeets legally, so what’s the difference?”

 

In fact, maybe that’s worse. Maybe you’d rather have Mexicans than pajeets. But I still think it would be a good thing to see the state, a modern Western state carry out a mass deportation of millions of people just so that people can see that it’s possible. And they’re going to have to use the military to do it. I would just love to see the military, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Under budget and ahead of schedule! That’s Trump’s little caption for it. Yeah.

 

[1:05:42]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I do think it would be great! Like, that would be the one keynote thing. Maybe the jews will let him do it just because he’s giving them everything else that they want.

 

So he has made it a kind of centre point, like the way that the [border] wall was like a centre point last time. This seems to be one of his main centre point policies. And according to opinion polls, when Trump was elected in 2016, only about 40 something percent of Americans said that they would support mass deporting illegal immigrants. Now it’s like 66% or something in the last poll they did. So there’s public support for it, just probably because of the sheer quantity that have come over the border in recent years. And, yeah, obviously people could say:

 

“Well, what are they going to do about illegal immigration?”

 

Sorry, about legal immigration, probably that isn’t going to improve. But there’s still like something crazy! Like they estimate 15 to 30 million illegal immigrants in America, at least.

 

So that’s a pretty large amount of people. So if they were going to seriously undertake their removal, I think that would be an objectively good thing. And it would just be great optics for mass deportations as an idea, as a concept. Obviously, it would be different, like in Australia, we would want to do a mass deportation of legal immigrants! But so that would obviously have a different connotation.

 

But nevertheless, just to show that it’s possible. But you can round people up and remove them en masse. And you can do it in a clean and orderly fashion, like you said, on time and under budget or ahead of schedule and under budget. So I do like that. I do feel like, I mean, other people say:

 

“Well, why would you hope for that? They’re just promising it, but they won’t deliver it.”

 

And yeah, I’m sceptical, but at the same time, something to keep an eye on because he’s going to win! It doesn’t matter what anyone watching the show does.

 

Thomas Sewell: He didn’t complete the wall, but he at least brought the wall into the conversation. And we have the images of the wall. We have the Democrats crying at the wall! The wall was a symbolic victory, even if it wasn’t like a logistic victory.

 

And likewise, I think the same thing will happen with the deportations. They’re not going to send back the 35 million illegal Mexicans and Central Americans in the country. No way! But they’ll send enough back to prove a point. And that’s certainly a better position and a better situation.

 

But ultimately, it doesn’t change our situation. We still need to build power.

 

Joel Davis: Of course.

 

Thomas Sewell: And I think a lot of the rhetoric that’s happening stems from the innate strength of the far-Right. And that it’s much better to get Trump to appeal to the far-Right than it is to not have a far-Right or it is to not have Trump.

 

So, yeah, obviously things are moving in the right direction. It’s just not as fast as everyone wants it to. Everyone wants a fascist dictator to take over tomorrow. But realistically, we’re still a few more election cycles away from that happening.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, definitely. I think we just need to see mass., … And it’s important for Europe as well because momentum is really building there around re-migration. I think a mass deportation being effected in America would be inspirational and would galvanise, I think, a lot of the European Right to further rigidify their policies.

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s no legitimacy to the Leftist opposition when they come to the table in the Parliament and say:

 

“Oh, but this is not logistically feasible or this is going to cost too much money.”

 

All these talking points go out the window once Trump has actually proven you can deport a couple million people in a short period of time. And yeah, America sneezes and the rest of the world blows its nose is a pretty common expression for these kind of how, you know, politics bleeds out of America. Once America does something, once the rest of the world is like:

 

“Oh, that’s possible. Okay, well, we’re allowed to do that now.”

 

And everyone’s kind of waiting for permission from Rome or big daddy or however you want to look at it from a political standpoint. They always wait for the capital. The capital’s kind of sometimes got to make the first move. Otherwise it’s seen as like a rebellion against the order. You know, you can’t just have like the Danish just deport like a couple hundred thousand, you know, Algerians or whatever the fuck is in Denmark at the moment. I’m sure there’s some racial subset there that’s balkanizing it. You can’t really do that until you kind of get permission, unless you risk what happened with Germany, basically. And that was a very different world to today.

 

Do you want to get on the next topic?

 

Joel Davis: I wanted to ask you your opinion about, because there’s one other, it’s kind of related to this, but it’s a different story. And it’s really been grouping Right-wing Twitter, particularly the American wing of Right-wing Twitter, which is the dominant element of it over the last few days. There’s this account called Libs of TikTok. I’m sure you’re aware of it’s run by some jewish woman. It’s just like some conservative account.

 

But anyway, there’s been a whole bunch of like, American libtards that have been going on social media and being like:

 

“Oh, like the assassin, don’t miss next time!”

 

About like the assassination attempt.

 

And they got a few of them fired from their jobs, or something, in the way that Leftists have been getting us fired from our jobs. And there’s been a bit of a debate on the online right as to, like, whether it’s a good, or a bad thing! Some side was saying:

 

“Oh, it’s not good optics. They’re just like random libtard, you know, moms and pops. They’re just normie libtards. Like, getting them fired from their job at Home Depot is kind of bad optics or something.”

 

The other view that I think people like myself, I agree with this is, fuck libtards! They have been complicit, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Annihilation.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! They have been complicit in, look at what happened during Covid, what they were complicit in there. What they’ve been complicit in getting so many of our guys fired for our political opinions. They have yet been complicit in the social enforcement of an agenda that’s trying to genocide our race and turn our kids into faggots and trannies.

 

I think Sam Hyde said on Twitter that they basically all need to be put into electroshock therapy or re-education camps or something.

 

Thomas Sewell: I agree. At a minimum.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! And he made a very good post on the matter. And I think, basically, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I heard he had a good tweet on it, but I hadn’t seen the tweet yet. Is that the famous tweet people are talking about that went off?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. Went off. You should look it up. I did quote, tweet it.

 

So, yeah, you could find it on my page.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I’ll have a look at it. Well, yeah. My initial reaction is, Adolf Hitler says:

 

“We must fight fire with fire and poison gas with poison gas!”

 

So that’s doctrinal for me. So nothing’s off limits in that regard.

 

And I also am just a big believer in just reflecting what they’re doing to us back onto them. So if it works, if it’s effective, you know, send it back on them. They deserve it’s cosmic justice. It’s harming karma however you want to look at it.

 

[1:13:10]

 

 

Furthermore, what I’d say is that if you can’t rule by love and respect, then you can only rule by fear.

 

Now, ultimately, you don’t want to have to rule by fear, but we’re in a toxic relationship with libshits! We actually don’t want to be married to them. We don’t want to be in a society with them. We’re in a dysfunctional family, or a dysfunctional marriage. And it ultimately needs to be a split, a schism, a divorce, we can go to couples therapy. There’s all sorts of things that we can do, but I don’t think any of it is going to fix it.

 

So, yeah, anything that creates – this might be taken out of context by the intelligence surveillance organisations of the country – but what we’re in is an arms race.

 

And I’m going to say that from a completely philosophical standpoint.

 

Joel Davis: Metaphorical.

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re in an arms race, and they’re using these weapons. Yeah, a metaphorical arms race. Exactly! And they’re using these weapons against us, like doxxing, like firing. They’re using the weapons against us. We would be absolutely foolish to not retaliate with the same capacity, because we’re in an arms race and people on our side. And I think I’ve written some essays on this before, the people on our side that are like:

 

“No, I’m not with them. I’m not with the fighters. I’m not with the people doing this!”

 

They’re just cowards! They are not actually against these people getting doxxed on a moral principle. They’re not against these people losing their jobs based on a moral principle. What they’re against is the arms race. They’re against us doing it back because they know inherently that that will make libshits more radical, and then libshits are going to become more violent, more aggressive. Their politics is going to become more radical and revolutionary, and it’s ultimately going to lead to a Spanish civil war scenario where the communists are pulling the nuns out of the Churches and raping them.

 

And because these cowards don’t ultimately want to fight back, when it gets to that level, … Because when it gets to that level, when the communists are pulling the nuns out of the Church and raping them, and pulling the corpses out of the Church and the effigies and anything else that’s of some sort of significance, and defiling them, pissing on them, raping the corpses, whatever they were doing, … When that eventually does occur, because of this arms race of back and forth, because we keep standing up for ourselves, they keep escalating, we keep standing up for ourselves, they keep escalating. And this back and forth keeps occurring.

 

Again, they always draw first blood. We didn’t start cancel culture, we didn’t start doxxing, we didn’t start any of these things. And likewise with the assassination attempt on Trump, I can’t think of an assassination attempt on any Left-wing politician in recent history.

 

But anyway, …

 

Joel Davis: There’s been heaps of attempts of other Right-wing politicians in Europe over the past year.

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly! There’s been knife attacks, hammer attacks, shootings you know, there’s been all sorts of attacks on us, …

 

Joel Davis: In Spain and Germany.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, likewise in Greece and in Italy and in Spain, there’s many nationalists that have been murdered and assassinated. The one time there’s an assassination, or it wasn’t assassination, but there was a murder in Greece that caused Golden Dawn to be shut down and registered as a criminal organisation.

 

Golden Dawn members were assassinated in the past, and the Antifas and the communist groups, none of them were designated as criminal organisations. So there’s an arms race. That’s what happens. And when we retaliate, generally, that’s what happens. So you’re going to have people saying:

 

“Oh, you can’t do this! This has to be taken off the table!”

 

Because they’re ultimately afraid to stand up and fight. When it gets to the nuns getting pulled out of the Church and raped, the people that are on our side when it comes time to actually form the, … I can’t remember the name of the Spanish nationalist battalion that actually went out and dealt with that problem. But the equivalent of how, why was the Einsatzgruppen*, and why were the SS forming anti-guerrilla warfare units, counterinsurgency units? Why were they forming units to hunt down paramilitaries? Well, that’s because jews trained by NKVD were behind enemy lines and they were doing horrible war crimes behind enemy lines after Operation Barbarossa**.

 

[* The Einsatzgruppen were special units of the German Security Police and SD assigned to execute security measures immediately behind German lines. With the assistance of the Waffen SS, police units, the army, allied Romanian forces, and local collaborators, the Einsatzgruppen conducted shooting of partisans and other local enemy forces.]

 

[** Operation Barbarossa was the pre-emptive offensive invasion of the Soviet Union by Germany and many of its Axis allies, starting on Sunday, 22 June 1941, during World War II. It was the largest and costliest land offensive in human history, with around 10 million combatants taking part, and over 8 million casualties by the end of the operation.]

 

And so the SS had to form units to deal with that problem. They had to form pretty savage units to deal with that pretty savage problem. In my opinion, don’t fear the arms race. Just lean into it and fight back, and there’s going to be casualties in war. And as it escalates, that will lead to the libshits working out more strategies to harm conservative people.

 

 

But, yeah, absolutely! I think that libshits should be in fear to say that kind of stuff on the Internet. It shows that we’re taking back ground, which is very important in the psychological space.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Superchat, by the way, from Gustavus Vassar, saying:

 

“When will you invite Haas to the show?”

 

I don’t think that’s going to be happening anytime soon. He’s a pretty bad host, actually. When I debated him last weekend, probably shouldn’t have agreed to a debate with a communist without a moderator.

 

So that was kind of probably stupid by me. Anyway, so, yeah, I don’t really have any interest in engaging with the hostile person, particularly a non-White communist without a moderator ever again as a result of that.

 

But yeah, on this topic of what you’re describing. Again, to bring up Carl Schmitt, Carl Schmitt diagnoses liberalism in the classical sense as de-politicizing, in the sense that liberalism says:

 

“We’re going to have these rights and these norms and all the different political ideologies have to respect these norms so that we can have a kind of fair and just and reasonable competition within the paradigm of these rules and strictures to prevent political polarisation and a contest for absolute power between one or another ideological faction.”

 

And so liberalism is in a certain sense, not actually a form of politics, but it’s a form of anti-politics by this definition.

 

And so these libertarian and conservative types who are like:

 

“Well, if you engage in cancel culture, you’re just as bad as the Left. (Or) if you engage in identity politics, well, you’re just as bad as the Left or blah, blah, blah! You’re just playing into the enemy’s hands!”

 

Like:

 

“If the enemy is doing identity politics and you do White Identity Politics, you’re just playing into their hands. You’re just proving their point. You do cancel culture, then you can’t complain about them doing cancel culture!”

 

And the thing is, the issue is not the tactics of the Left. The issue is not the means of the Left. It’s the ends of the Left. It’s what they’re using the tactics for.

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly!

 

Joel Davis: Like the issue isn’t that people use guns when they try to kill people. The issue is when they kill people unjustly. If you’re killing bad people, then using a gun is a good thing. In the same sense of if you’re using cancel culture against Leftists who are the enemy of our civilisation, it’s a good thing. If using identity politics to defend the White race, it’s a good thing because we are speaking from the perspective of what’s good for the White race, what’s good for Western civilisation, what’s good for our families, for our nations. And the Left is fundamentally opposed to that. They’re a civilisational virus!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes!

 

Joel Davis: And so the issue isn’t how they’re going about things. The issue is what they are, what they’re for. And what these conservatives want to do is they want to preserve this space of society that can somehow be de-politicised where it doesn’t matter if you’re on the left or the Right or what race you are or what political affiliations you have:

 

“We can all just watch the game and touch grass together. And so on and drink a beer and talk about the weather.”

 

They want to preserve this kind of social peace from being politicised.

 

But the thing is that that time is well and truly over! When we were a homogeneous White society and it was like the 1950s and the argument between the Left and the Right was over tax policy or something, we could have a fair and gentlemanly political conflict that didn’t infect all of society. Now the Left has basically totally gone after us, to try and completely de-platform us from being able to participate in politics. We’re banned from using social media. We’re banned from using many, most venues. We’re banned from so many aspects of society, indirectly, if not directly, because of our political affiliations. And so many other people on the Right experience the same thing across the Western world.

 

They’ve taken over the school system, they’ve taken over the media, they’ve taken over the government, and they’re using all of these institutions to completely destroy our civilisation and kill our race!

 

And so your response to that is:

 

“We’re at war!”

 

You don’t get to choose to go to war or not when the enemy has chosen to go to war.

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly!

 

Joel Davis: You only get to choose whether you’re going to war or not, when the enemy is still trying to have peace, where the enemy hasn’t declared war on you yet. Once they declare war, you have no choice! You just got to fight! You either fight or you surrender!

 

[1:22:26]

 

 

And so what these conservatives actually are, is they’re surrender monkeys.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Like, they delude through their convoluted morality, they basically are appealing to, they say:

 

“Well, the moral thing to do would be to have a society that was de-politicised, that had these fair and just rules that all people would be subject to.”

 

That’s not actually a moral system, though. What that is a truce. What that is that is a negotiation, …

 

Thomas Sewell: A truce with the devil.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but the thing is that the devil’s not interested in taking the truce, first of all. And second of all, even if they were, the only reason that they would be interested in taking the truce would be because we had turned the tables and now we were in the ascendancy, in which case we should just run over them and fucking crush them! Because then we’re winning!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Joel Davis: So there’s no point taking a truce. When you have to appeal to rights and democracies and norms, it means you’re in the losing position. It means you’re like trying to say to the enemy:

 

“Hey, hey, hey! We should have all of these, I should have all of these things that protect me from you totally dominating me.”

 

But once you’re in power, all of those things become irrational. They just become limitations on your power.

 

So the Left are in power. They’re saying:

 

“Well, fuck rights! Fuck democracy! Fuck all of these things!”

 

They were only useful to use against the Right when they still had some power, when they were still afraid of them. Now that they’re no longer afraid of us, they’re destroying all of these things.

 

So now we have to fight them. Like, the time under which these things could have protected us is long gone. And trying to appeal to them as principles against your own side makes no sense. Appealing to them against the enemy, trying to expose the enemy’s hypocrisy or whatever, yeah, that does make sense. And if you can convince dumbasses on the left to care about the rights of Right-wingers, then go right ahead. Let them be useful idiots that basically take the boot off our neck as a result. But I’m trying to convince your own side to take the boot off your enemy’s neck. It’s fucking retarded, strategically.

 

But, of course, a lot of these conservatives, they don’t think in these terms. They don’t want to fight. As you said. They’re afraid of polarisation. They’re afraid of civil war or, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Because they think we’ll lose. They’re defeatists! They’re fundamentally weak! They’re lazy! They’re defeatists!

 

Joel Davis: And even if they win, even if they thought that we could win, they probably still would argue against it because they don’t want to, …

 

Thomas Sewell: They might break a nail, …

 

Joel Davis: Winning would still still cost. Like, no war is won without casualties. And they don’t want to pay the price.

 

So a lot of the people that were saying:

 

“Oh, you shouldn’t go after this poor woman, blah, blah, blah.”

 

A lot of them, I noticed, were, were women, or they were gen-Xer types and so on. Obviously, on Twitter, it’s hard to tell exactly who someone is because, well, …

 

Thomas Sewell: They haven’t been hurt yet. They haven’t been hurt by the Left. They’re in a comfortable position. They’re comfortable, you know, they’re paying off their mortgage. They’ve got a decent job. You know, they haven’t been hurt. They haven’t suffered from the Left’s tyranny. They haven’t had their bank accounts closed down. They haven’t had the police knock on their door. Because they’re not fighting, they’re just spectating, they’re like:

 

“Whoa, whoa, whoa! Let’s be civil here, guys. Come on!”

 

And it’s like:

 

“Do you forget what they did to us? Do you think we’ve forgotten what they’ve done to us?”

 

We’re going to do much worse to them, when the shoe is on the other foot.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly!

 

Also, the other objection that I heard was from more people on our side who were saying:

 

“Oh, like, why are you supporting this? The Libs of TikTok, they’re run by, that account is run by a jewish woman. Trump is a Zionist, so who cares if someone is advocating for assassinating them?”

 

My response to this is, those principles that we just discussed about Left-Right polarisation are actually more important than any of those specific details.

 

Secondly, when Leftists and jews attack each other, the only proper response to that is to get your popcorn out and cheer it on, because you just want them to do as much damage to each other as possible. But third of all there’s a distinction between, … Like, there’s attacking Trump from the Right, which is basically attacking Trump because he’s not enough like Hitler. Trump should be more Hitler.

 

And so those kinds of attacks are different. Like, those kinds of attacks are legitimate. They’re like an internal Right-wing attack trying to drag the consciousness towards a more Right-wing position. But the Left-wing attack is that Trump is too much like Hitler, or Trump, like, even if it’s delusional, they’re like:

 

“Trump is literally Hitler!”

 

And so when they’re attacking Trump, they’re attacking the idea of Hitler, basically. They’re attacking the idea of a strong Right-wing leader who actually stands up for White people and stands up to the Left.

 

[1:27:13]

 

Now, now, that might not actually comport with the reality of Trump, but it doesn’t matter because that idea is still a real political idea, because the spectre of a Right-wing populist leader rising and seizing control of the state and basically destroying libtards and basically deporting all the non-Whites and putting all the trannies and gays into re-education camps and all this kind of stuff, that is still like a spectre that haunts the political process.

 

The idea of like, proper Right-wing political victory, not conservatives winning election, but like, the establishment of a Right-wing authoritarian state, what that would mean, what that would imply. And people see echoes of that kind of Julius Caesar figure or Hitlerian figure in Trump, because the Right-wing energy that coalesced around Trump had that spectre. He tapped into that spectre, even if he doesn’t actually embody it in practice.

 

So when a Left-winger attacks Trump, they’re really, from that perspective, they’re attacking the Right, they’re attacking Right-wing authoritarianism, they’re attacking the spectre of Hitler, they’re attacking the White race, they’re attacking everything that we hold dear.

 

And so because they’re attacking him for the wrong reason that just proves that they’re the political enemy, and therefore, any punishment that comes out to them, any discipline that comes out to them, fantastic! I wouldn’t agree with canceling anyone on the Right who is, like a far-Right person who attacks Trump from the Right, obviously. That’s totally legitimately, totally different.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: So, and I haven’t actually seen that happening. I haven’t seen, like, a, like, a wignat who is calling Trump a jewish shill or something. No one’s going after them and getting them fired for that. They’re getting fired for their actual political beliefs, not for that specific one.

 

So, yeah, I wouldn’t be too concerned. Like, ultimately, what is being achieved here is nothing that really impacts us. It’s just like, laugh at the libtard suffering and cheer on more libtard suffering.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, I agree to these terms.

 

Joel Davis: You know did you see that video of Tucker Carlson that I posted a few days ago?

 

Thomas Sewell: I saw two videos of Tucker Carlson. One was of him going after the Schofield Bible, and the other was him talking about, Great Replacement, again.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the Great Replacement one, should I play? It’s only, like, a minute 30.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: I want to get your thoughts on this. I gave my thoughts on Telegram and Twitter. Because I think this is interesting, like, this seems to be a step ahead of stuff that we’ve heard from Tucker up till this point.

 

Tucker: You know, why would you want to watch the people whose ancestors built the country die, mock them as they die, and then replace them? I don’t understand. I mean, that suggests actual hate, like, homicidal hate! I would never want something like that for anybody. By the way, it’s not just the United States. It’s happening all over the Western world. The people whose ancestors built these countries are dying, and they’re being replaced. And it’s like, why would you want to do that? There’s something very heavy going on.

 

 

You know, I mean, go to Sweden, go to the UK, go to London! I mean, it’s shocking! And I don’t at this point care if you’re not allowed to notice it or if you’re racist to notice it’s happening in Ireland. Ireland! Ireland was never a colonial power! Like, in the United States, like:

“Well, you have to put up this because you were mean to Puerto Rico or something!”

You know what I mean?

Or you’ve used too much carbon. So you have an obligation to allow all of Central Africa move to your country and give them housing vouchers. Okay. But Ireland never did anything to anybody. Ireland was oppressed by Great Britain, actually. It was never a colonial power! Sat out an entire World War [WW II]. No, exactly! They suffered a potato famine. So why are you doing this to the Irish? They are the indigenous population of their island, and you’re watching them die and replacing them with people from the third world. On what basis are you doing that, George Soros, actually? Like, what’s the real answer? And you have to think that this is genocidal intent. Like, what else is it? I mean, honestly, what else is it?:

“Oh, shut up!”

How about, no! Because I want to live it’s 1985 in the country that I loved, where honest questions could be asked with full confidence. You had a right to do that because you’re an American. And I’m going to live that way until I die. And I don’t care what they do to me. I’m going to live it’s 1985 in my country.

 

 

And I’m going to ask a super obvious question:

“Why are you doing that? And why are we putting up with it?”

I don’t think we should!

 

Thomas Sewell: Is that Donald Trump junior on the left?

 

Joel Davis: I don’t think so. that was on the Dan Bongino show.

 

Thomas Sewell: Is he the guy in the middle? That looked like Donald Trump junior on the left? Whoever it was on the left, was very uncomfortable. Not very uncomfortable, but was hiding their uncomfortableness with it. And I was wondering whether that was Donald Trump junior, because it kind of looked like him. It could be wrong.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, actually it is! It is Donald Trump Junior. Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. That’s definitely a huge increase in the rhetoric. That’s basically our rhetoric from a couple years ago. So he’s come a long way. Obviously, he said some pretty dumb things in the past, and even recently, even within the last twelve months, he said some pretty stupid things like that he doesn’t care. He said something that was like, could be perceived as quite anti-White. But that those statements seem just straight down the line. And he’s the most influential journalist in the world. And we’ve got Elon Musk often agreeing with a lot of the things Tucker Carlson says, and a lot of the memes floating around in our circles.

 

So we’ve got basically the richest man or second richest man in the world, and we’ve got the most influential, most watched, listened to journalist in the world, just straight up, he just straight up said that White genocide is a real thing and why is it happening? Who’s pushing it and why?

 

I like the rhetoricalness of it. I like the rhetoric of it, because sometimes if you say what’s happening, … Like, we can just say it’s the jews! And we can say:

 

“It’s the satanic, Kabbalahistic, Blackrock jews!”

 

And we can say who it is. But sometimes just asking the question is equally as powerful.

 

[1:33:42]

 

 

As much as everyone’s obsessed with saying:

 

“It’s the jews! It’s the jews!”

 

Often that doesn’t wake people up. It can shut people off. Versus just asking the question, plants that seed and opens the door to the next step. He’s opening doors. And these people, I thought if they’re controlled, if they controlled opposition, that kind of behaviour does not appear controlled. That kind of behaviour from him appears very open and free. Like, that’s his actual rhetoric. That doesn’t seem like a script, that doesn’t seem like the jews have told him what he’s allowed to say and what he’s not allowed to say. That just sounds completely sincere.

 

And when we think about the old gatekeepers, when we were dealing with the 2016 election cycle, Trump was saying all these things that were quite marvelous and about the wall and about American manufacturing and about it was like, it was very Baby Hitler. Yeah, it was like very baby Hitler. And we can’t have Hitler yet, but we can have, like, this really, really, really watered down version of it where it’s like:

 

“Wow! Finally just, …”

 

Joel Davis: [words unclear]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, exactly! And [word unclear] Hitler.

 

And then you had all these gatekeepers in the wider scene that weren’t really directly related to Trump. But you had these Ben Sharpiros, you had these Jordan Peterstein’s, you had all these characters, and they were really gate-keeping everyone. I noticed a lot of people started getting engaged in politics in 2016, and they’re on YouTube and they’re watching Trump speeches or they’re watching this kind of stuff.

 

And then the next video is “Peterstein”! And then it just takes you off course, because they’re gate-keeping and diverting. They’re diverting your attention.

 

Whereas what Tucker’s doing there, either consciously or unconsciously, he is opening the door to the next question, which is if he’s asking who’s doing it and why? And does this constitute genocide? Because that’s what it looks like. The next question is:

 

“Okay, so it’s the jews. They’re doing it because they hate us! It is genocide! What do we do about it?”

 

That’s a logical conclusion. That’s the dialogue.

 

Joel Davis: And even if you don’t even go to, “it’s the jews”, I think the logical conclusion to draw from it is:

 

“We’re being attacked as a race, therefore we have to defend ourselves as a race.”

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

zz And that’s why when I posted it, I also posted a video of him, his remarks from last year, where he counter-signaled the idea of White Identity Politics, saying:

 

“Well, just because you have the same skin colour as me. Why would you? You can’t speak on my behalf.”

 

And I thought that was a ridiculous idea because. Yeah, I thought that was a ridiculous notion, though, because, yeah, like, now you kind of can’t have both of those views at the same time. You know, you can’t say you can’t have White Identity Politics and also, but there’s a White genocide happening.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: We’ll see how he develops later.

 

Thomas Sewell: It is interesting what he says at the end there about:

 

“I want to live in 1985!”

 

Specifically, like this golden era of probably his childhood or his teenage years or young twenties or something.

 

And it’s like this golden era that he remembers where everything was sane and normal and black people were cool and crime was low [chuckling] and everyone just got along and it was like utopia, kind of semi multi-cult, like “salt and pepper” America. He wants to go back to salt and pepper America where nobody cared about race. Everyone’s colour-blind. He can’t have that! So now he’s asking questions about why we’re getting genocided. So that I think that that’s definitely an escalation in the right direction. In the arms race.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. When Tucker was in Australia recently, he was asked by some Leftist journalist, …

 

Thomas Sewell: That Asian chick?

 

Joel Davis: From the ABC, I don’t remember what she looked like because I just saw the video of, you could hear her voice, but I didn’t see her yeah, she could have been Asian.

 

Anyway, she asked him:

 

“Why are you promoting the racist conspiracy theory, the ‘Great Replacement’ that’s linked to mass shootings and blah, blah, blah?”

 

And he laughed at her. But what he said was:

 

“Well, it’s not just the White Americans that are being replaced, it’s also the black Americans!”

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Joel Davis: And a lot of people interpreted that in a negative way, and I could see why.

 

But at the same time, there is a certain kind of logic to that. But he’s trying to get out of being called a racist. But it is a obvious rhetorical move where you can say:

 

“Well, you know, America was a White country with a black minority, and that’s actually who real Americans are. And all these, you know, people that are coming in now, they aren’t really Americans or whatever.”

 

You can kind of see a certain logic to that where you can, … But then the thing is, you can’t extend that logic to any European country. And he explicitly defended a whole series of European countries. And also he said the same thing was happening in Australia.

 

So if he wants to have that, like, way of getting out of being called a racist in American politics, but then he still groups it in:

 

“Well, blacks aren’t being replaced in Africa, are they?”

 

So it just seems like these black slaves are just caught in the crossfire of White genocide and just so happen to have their jobs taken by Mexicans. But it’s not because George Soros and the jews are trying to replace blacks. It’s because they’re trying to replace Whites and they just so happen to be there.

 

So you could say it is a form of cucking. It is a form of optics cucking, but at the same time, … And he probably does genuinely like blacks, he did have a lot of blacks on his show when he was on Fox. I remember he interviewed Kanye West and, yeah, he seemed to kind of he always seemed to kind of have a certain kind of a negrophilia of sorts, which I guess is, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Everyone saying in the chat that Blair is trying to connect, that Blair’s in the house?

 

Oh, yeah, it is. Yeah, send him a link to the stream.

 

Joel Davis: I’ll send him a link. Yeah, I guess he’s free. That’s good.

 

But what I was gonna say about Tucker. Like, it’s not the rhetoric that I would use, but I can kind of see that gives him a certain kind of political protection where he can kind of pretend like he’s got his arm around the black guy and then he’s like:

 

“America is just us! Not any of you people!”

 

I don’t love it, but it’s still a vast improvement.

 

And then the day after he does this with Donald Trump junior sitting there on the stream, and then he’s sitting next to Trump at the RNC the following day taking photos. So, …

 

He kind of has this level of legitimacy and he has his own network now, ever since he got fired from Fox, where I guess he can kind of do what he wants and he’s been taking shots at Israel and now he’s talking, he’s a free man now. He can kind of do what he wants. And he’s so popular and he’s kind of independent that I guess he can get away with it.

 

So I’m kind of warming to him based upon those remarks in particular, if I’m honest.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s incredible, the things he’s saying. It’s absolutely changing the political dynamic. How’s it going, Blair? Good to see you.

 

Blair Cottrell: Hey, guys. Thanks for inviting me on. Sorry I had to message the main chat there and sorry I’m late. I wasn’t actually intending on making it home in time, but just got home from a family birthday dinner and I’m glad that I made it. I don’t know what’s being discussed, but I’ll just try to keep up with whatever topics passing by, …

 

Thomas Sewell: It was mostly just the RNC conference.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Just Trump, the assassination. Yeah. Geopolitics. So just like American-Indian alliance at the moment.

 

Joel Davis: Would you like to weigh in on anything to do with America or would you like to instead talk about you getting your YouTube banned, because that was also on the agenda.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think the biggest news is obviously the assassination attempt! I’ve yet to, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, we have covered it, though. We have completely, we covered the first, like 20 minutes of the show. So we can just jump straight to the next topic. Unless you want to give your take.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, my take is that I’m just kind of stunned by it. Not that it happened, but that he survived it! It’s just shocking that he survived it! I couldn’t believe it! When I saw that computer generated image where if he didn’t turn his head at the opportune time, the bullet would have gone through his skull. Is that just some Jupiterian-Sagi [astrology] luck or is this kind of, … I don’t know. I just don’t know how to describe this man. I don’t get it! I’m just like:

 

“Wow! He survived an assassination attempt by millimeters. Incredible! ?”

 

Joel Davis: And then the fist bumps and, like:

 

“Fight! Fight! Fight!”

 

Like was, it was pretty epic.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like WWE, everyone’s, …

 

Joel Davis: He kind of threw a Roman!

 

Blair Cottrell: Look. It’s really reinvigorated a bit of patriotic sentiment in the American people, and that’s great to see! And really, that’s all I can say about it. Let’s be honest. Like, I’m an outsider, I’m not an American, but there’s been some really cool footage that’s come of it.

 

And actually, the latest Trump video that came out the official Trump video was actually really based. It was really cool! Like, I enjoyed watching it. It was good propaganda, good electoral propaganda. I thought it was pretty funny.

 

Joel Davis: What was the video you’re referring to?

 

Blair Cottrell: The boys posted it in one of the chats. I don’t know. And they said it was unironically good. So I checked it out. It was just titled Make America Great Again. But it was just a compilation of his speeches and stuff. Like, you probably wouldn’t find it that interesting, but it was actually a cool video.

 

But what I was going to say is I find it amusing that Biden, as we predicted last week, has dropped out of the presidential race. But Kamala Harris, sorry, …

 

Joel Davis: That isn’t confirmed. There’s just rumours. But there are rumours.

 

Blair Cottrell: I thought it was confirmed.

 

Joel Davis: No, no, no! It was just rumours. But then people from Biden’s team came out and said, so apparently Biden has Covid right now. So he’s nowhere to be seen.

 

But yeah, people from Biden’s team came out and quashed the rumours after the rumours swelled up and it seemed like, okay, this might be the end for Biden. Then they came out and said:

 

“No, he’s not stepping down.”

 

So there seems to be a power struggle. There’s a large portion of the Democrat party that are really putting maximum pressure on him, trying to make him step down. But ultimately they can’t remove him, like, he has to step down because he’s already won the primary. So he’s already got the nomination. So they actually delayed the Democrat convention by a few weeks to give themselves more time to try and make him step down and everything. So they probably will get him to step down, but who knows? He could hold on for dear life Aryan Joe.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s frustrating because I’m getting information saying:

 

“Oh, he has stepped down, or he’s going to step down.”

 

But as you’ve just described, it’s obviously a power struggle within the Democrat party over there. But I don’t know. I’ll be surprised if he sticks it out the whole way. Hopefully he does. [chuckling] I think that’ll make for an easier Trump victory.

 

But let’s be honest. I’m pretty sure Trump’s going to win the presidency now after that spectacular, incomprehensible survival of the assassination attempt! I think it’s in the bag for Trump, but that’s all I’ve got to say on it. I suppose. This is the first time I’ve appeared on camera commenting on that specific subject, but I don’t really want to get too much into it because I’m not a learnt person when it comes to American politics.

 

So all I can really do is give that sort of reaction to the process of the assassination. [chuckling]

 

[1:45:15]

 

 

Joel Davis: I want to ask you, though. Do you think it was a setup or do you think it was incompetence? I know you initially said incompetence, and I can understand why because there was a lot of evidence of incompetence, but in my opinion, that itself was probably part of the setup. Like, you put a bunch of retarded women to be not the fall guys, the fall girls and so on, so that you can sell the incompetence narrative.

 

But I think the oversight was so extensive and there’s so many weird details. Like, apparently the shooter had, like, three foreign bank accounts, and he doesn’t have any social media. Like, they’re really kind of covering up his background and then not securing the building, not even putting, like, any personnel on the building that he climbed up upon was like, a ridiculous oversight. It seemed almost too ridiculous to me.

 

And also there was that bank, that investment bank that shorted all of this stock in Donald Trump Media or whatever the day before. And they said it was a clerical error, but it seems kind of convenient. There’s a lot of dodgy shit around it that makes me suspicious. But I saw you start to get a bit more suspicious on Telegram.

 

So what’s your view on it? What percentage chance do you think it was incompetence? And what percentage chance do you think it was a setup?

 

Blair Cottrell: Initially, I did just think it was incompetence, and I put it down to too many women, or inexperienced women, specifically, as boots on the ground Secret Service members. And I did a bit of a write up on this on my Telegram channel, perhaps even on my new X account, too, which I finally got around to making, since it’s looking like I’m not going to get my original old Twitter account back, regardless of the amount of kicking and screaming that I’m doing. Which I’m not really doing a lot of kicking and screaming, that’s not really my style. What I mean is, I’m just not going to get my old account back, it seems.

 

But I put it down to just females, because women, they don’t usually do well in situations where they have to think and react quickly. And this is not really having a dig at women, but women are never actually sure of what to do. And they’re never sure of how to act or react, especially in a high stress situation. And if you’ve ever played, and this was the wording I used in my post, if you’ve ever played Call of Duty or chess against a woman, you’ll understand what I’m talking about.

 

I think the reason Trump almost got shot, or initially, I thought the reason Trump almost got shot was simply because too much time was wasted on the indecision of women. There was too many women in the decision making process, in how the Secret Service was set up, and there was too many women around Trump, at the time of the assassination attempt. And they just weren’t sure of what to do! They just weren’t sure! And it all just came down to that indecision.

 

However, after I saw that’s a Austin Wealth Group, or whatever they were called, shorted 12 million worth of Trump shares, or 12,000 Trump shares, however it actually works, I’m not sure, because I’m not an economist, I’m not someone who sits on the stock market looking at shares all day. But I know what a short is. I know that it’s betting that a stock falls and Trump stocks would have fallen, obviously. His business would have taken a massive hit if he had have been killed, obviously.

 

And then there was the shorting of Rumble from the same business entity, a business entity, Austin Wealth, which also is a major donor to Zionist and jewish groups throughout America. That’s really fucking suspicious! That indicates prior knowledge somewhere by someone, okay, that was connected to this specific group.

 

But as you said, they’re claiming that it was just a mistake, it was just a clerical error. As if! Like that you don’t make, when you’re a wealth group that big, that organised, you don’t make clerical errors that large, it just doesn’t happen!

 

So they’re covering, they’re trying to claim ignorance.

 

So I’m not actually sure at this stage. I think more information is going to come out in time, as it always does, and we’ll be in a better position to have a clearer perspective on what was actually happening on that day and leading up to that day. The lack of information about the shooter is also really interesting. There is some speculation that he was a transvestite, but I’m not sure if that’s confirmed. If he does turn out to be a member of the transgender community, that’s going to be pretty significant. [chuckling] That’s going to put members of this community who are politically active on watch lists, as they probably should be anyway, because they’re taking a plethora of drugs and they’re generally deranged as a rule. So I think most people who are transvestites and into politics should already have eyes on them.

 

But look, I won’t comment any further because I could imagine you guys have already gone into some detail before I arrived on the show, pretty much ready to move on.

 

My perspective is, initially I thought it was incompetence and just too many women in Secret Service. Now I’m starting to think that someone knew something, but I’m not sure whether that someone had enough influence to actually set it up or not. They may have just heard that something was going on and made the Right moves to try to make money out of it. Because that’s all these investment companies do when it, especially those of a judaic nature, they don’t really care who lives and who dies, and they’re not really overly invested in who lives and who dies. They’re just trying to make as much money as they can from circumstance. Right?

 

So Austin Wealth Group, them doing the shorts on the Trump shares the day before the assassination attempt. It doesn’t really indicate that they were involved, but it does indicate that someone in that company, connected to that company, knew something and they were trying to profit from it. That’s what it indicates to me.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think it’s a reasonable suspicion. It’ll be interesting because I think Trump will get in. I thought he was already kind of inevitable to win even before that, but I think it’s even more locked in now, I don’t anticipate there’s going to be a very thorough investigation now. But you would think once he gets in, he’s going to want to go after whoever the fuck killed, like, tried to kill him. You would think just based on self preservation. So you think he’d probably have a proper, a real good investigation once, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But Joel, the first thing you should do is sack the director of the Secret Service. That Kimberly woman, after she said:

 

“Oh, I didn’t put people on that roof. That was a known threat and identified a threat because there was a slope on the roof. But I did have counter-snipers on a different sloped roof.”

 

What kind of, what a fucking, … What an ignorant, …

 

Joel Davis: You could put people on the ground as well to prevent anyone climbing up there.

 

Blair Cottrell: But she needs to take this. Like, nothing against women generally, but that is just so stereotypically female to refuse to take responsibility and refuse to resign in a situation where any other person would resign. You know, you just resign.

 

Joel Davis: Do you think that’s part of the setup? Because, like, it’s too stupid! Like, even for a woman. Like, maybe it’s not too stupid for a woman. But it feels almost too stupid to me that, like, surely even she isn’t that stupid! You know what I mean?

 

Blair Cottrell: I just don’t know, …

 

Joel Davis: Then it gives you a way to be angry at the incompetent, retarded woman rather than suspecting the setup.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. I think when it comes to women, the tendency to stubbornly, …

 

Joel Davis: I hear what [chuckling] you’re saying!

 

Blair Cottrell: Onto power just in spite of you. I think, like, we can’t underestimate them.

 

Joel Davis: Women are so bad at taking responsibility. It’s insane! I mean, it is a great point. Every time a woman takes responsibility, they always, like, spin it around to blaming you in some convoluted way.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, look, but I’m not here to, …

 

Joel Davis: You made me feel this way and yeah, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t want to bash on women too much. Like, we sort of give women a hard time on this show sometimes, even though women are really appreciative of us.

 

I mean, I can speak for both of you guys. Like, we have, like, got girlfriends. Everyone’s happy. We have the respect of women in our lives. So we got to take that into consideration too. Women aren’t all bad! But look, I’ve kind of just jumped on this show without, like, being prepared or actually thinking that I was going to come on tonight.

 

So I can’t really give a, how should I say, calm, detailed explanation of my take other than what I’ve given up until this point. So probably best that we just finish it there and maybe move on to the next subject, if you’re ready to do that.

 

[1:53:39]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I want to talk quickly, …

 

Thomas Sewell: What’s that show called? I think it’s controlled opposition, but it’s like an Arab news network, and they always got, like, people on there with crazy rants. What’s it called? It’s not Al Jazeera, but it’s like the anti-Judah, …

 

Joel Davis: Memory TV.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Memory TV. Yeah. We’re like the Aryan version of Memory TV, where no matter what we’re talking about, somehow it devolves to, like, complaining about women or the jews.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but it’s kind of based.

 

Blair Cottrell: The feminine element of society is doing fundamental damage to our society. So it’s no wonder that we keep going on, … And when I say feminine element, I’m not necessarily always referring to women. That’s the thing. But look, we won’t open up that can of worms.

 

Thomas Sewell: He’s just referring to incompetence and weakness in general. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Blair brought it back to, like:

 

“No, no, we actually respected women!”

 

But then [chuckling] the misogyny just has to, like, exude out of him regardless. No, we respect the particular women that would be upset at us for having these opinions, but we’re just talking about all the other women.

 

All right, [chuckling] I think that’s what Blair’s trying to say.

 

Blair Cottrell: Look, at the end of the day, let me finish it with this will be the full stop. Any sensible woman would not deny that there should not be women in active, protective, defensive, military services or military stuff. Like, if you’re a sensible woman, you would agree that those are male roles, because men have a faster response time, they’re more decisive. They’re just better suited to those roles. Men will just eliminate the threat. If there’s a threat, they’ll limit it. They’ll shoot it!

 

Whereas a woman would be like:

 

“Oh, shit! Should I do it? I’m not sure. Is it the right thing? What if it’s an innocent person? What if this is the wrong decision? What should I do? Someone tell me what to do!”

 

Right? Whereas if it’s a man in that position and he’s trained, there’s a threat on that roof over there. Bang, dead!

 

Joel Davis: They actually have the caption from the Secret Service people on the stage. And the woman was quoted in the transcript as saying:

 

“What’s happening? What are we doing? What’s happening? What are we doing?”

 

And she’s like, running around, flailing while everyone else jumps on Trump, and they’re all on the floor.

 

Thomas Sewell: She hid behind Trump! Have you seen the photo of them hiding behind Trump?

 

Blair Cottrell: The wage gap!

 

Thomas Sewell: The wage gap. Yeah.

 

All right, next question.

 

Joel Davis: Yes.

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s a few Superchats. Did you want to do them first? Are you doing them at the end?

 

Joel Davis: No, I’ll do at the end because we got to talk about this story, which is about Blair. Which is:

 

“So Australian censorship worsens.”

 

This is from Noticer.news. Get all your news from Noticer dot News:

 

“Australian censorship worsens as YouTube bans nationalist Blair Cottrell for travel vlog.”

 

Here’s like the thumbnail of the video. I think you can still find this video on Rumble, right, Blair? You put it on Rumble as well?

 

vv not yet. I was planning on.

 

Joel Davis: You put on Telegram. You put on Telegram?

 

Blair Cottrell: No, I think YouTube was actually the only place that was uploaded to for the time being. My plan was to kind of concentrate my forces, because that YouTube channel was four years old, and it was one that I set up just for fun, basically, just to stir shit up and for shits and gigs, but nothing overly political or edgy. Mostly gym advice, bit of reaction type video. Like, I tried that as well. I was just trying different stuff, and I didn’t expect it to get taken down. I was like:

 

“Why would they delete this channel? Like, I’m not really saying anything provocative?”

 

And I was surprised that it lasted for four years. It was paid premium.

 

If you read this article, everything in there is accurate. Noticer News reached out to me because they thought it was absurd that a YouTube channel could be just wiped after I upload a travel vlog that involves me training with some members of an Active group. There’s nothing political really said in the group. Like, in the footage, it’s all normal stuff, just guys working out in a gym. And I publicly stated that my intention was to kind of shed a little bit of light on what these guys are really like.

 

I mean, they’re just normal guys with regular jobs and families who are concerned about where their country’s going, what’s happening to their ethnic community, which is a totally normal, legitimate concern. They’re not, you know, extremist threat, neo-Nazi enemy to the country, kind of! That’s not who these guys are in reality. And I know that because a lot of them are my friends.

 

And I just wanted to make a bit of an effort to break the perception that the media has created about guys in the Right-wing. I mean, yes, some of the guys in the Right-wing can be a bit extreme, but it’s not the kind of extreme where they’re like some sort of terrorist threat. They’re just extremely dedicated to the survival of their country, their community, their culture, which is a good thing in a lot of cases. I mean we know a lot about how the phrase “extreme” is used these days. It’s used to scare people away from legitimate, dedicated, organised groups and men. Right?

 

But look, long story short, I woke up the other day, went to my first client, and on the way there I thought:

 

“Oh, I’ll listen to some music.”

 

Because I was using YouTube music, which is kind of like a Spotify alternative. If you pay for YouTube Premium, you get access to this secondary a which basically converts every video song uploaded to YouTube into its own track.

 

And so you can have a library. But I couldn’t access my music because it said, like, it wouldn’t load. And everything else was loading.

 

So I’m like, what’s going on? And then I saw that the whole YouTube channel was gone. YouTube channel was gone. Check my emails. YouTube had sent me an email saying:

 

“You have repeatedly and severely violated our community guidelines.”

 

And so I went through the appeal process. I wrote the appeal and I said:

 

“Hey, can you give me an example? One single example of how I have severely or repeatedly violated your community guidelines? Like, just one example would be great, just so I understand where you’re coming from.”

 

They replied a day later saying:

 

“Sorry, we’re not restoring your account due to violations. See you later, alligator.”

 

So they didn’t answer my question.

 

Thomas Sewell: And it’s just talking to a psychopath, you know?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. The reason this is significant, though, is because I wasn’t using that channel for anything other than humanizing members of the so-called “far-Right” Nazi groups. Like, these are real people with real legitimate concerns.

 

And as I said, I publicly stated that it was my effort to humanise these guys a little bit. It wasn’t the primary reason for which I was filming the content. I was just kind of having fun. But I slotted some of that stuff in there because I thought I might as well do something productive while I’m making content.

 

And after my very first effort to upload a single video in which I clearly show that these are just like normal guys going to the gym, they have lunch together, they train together, they have normal views. And actually, when you understand what’s happened to them in their lives, their perspectives are completely understandable.

 

After one single effort to try to do that, I’m just completely nuked! My whole account is deleted. And I’ve just got no right to ask why the appeal process is rejected straight away.

 

I also tried to get the attention of YouTube on X, formally Twitter. And I did get their attention, thanks to the help of some of the guys in the community. But it looks like I was just talking to an algorithm robot. It was just telling me:

 

“Oh, it was for circumvention.”

 

Meaning I was already banned and I was circumventing the ban. But I said the account was four years old and it was paid premium for four years, and it was under my full name. So why were you taking my money for four years if I was supposed to be banned! And the account that they said was originally banned or something. They might be referring to The Joel and Blair Show because I was a part of that program, because they’ve banned The Joel and Blair Show. Maybe that’s their idea of how I’ve circumvented their ban?

 

Joel Davis: That was the same reason they gave that my YouTube was banned. They said I was circumventing the ban of The Joel and Blair Show channel. So what? We create a channel for a separate show? The two of us do. And therefore both of our YouTube channels are circumventing that original ban, even though both of our YouTube channels predated it by several years and had lots of different content on it that had nothing to do with the show. That’s totally ridiculous!

 

Blair Cottrell: Look, the point is, I just got completely targeted and wiped from YouTube for life! Not for giving some offensive opinion, not for harassing anyone, not for actually doing anything other than to try to humanise and show the real lives, the real types of people that are on the far-Right or in the nationalist community. That’s all I was trying to do. And after my first effort to do that, I completely shut down and censored. That is eye opening, man!

 

Because a lot of effort has been put in by major media and political class, academic class, especially in my country, Australia, to vilify members of the nationalist community, to make them seem more like the “next terrorist threat”. And I’m thinking:

 

“Well, I know that’s not true, because I am a nationalist and my friends are in nationalist groups, active clubs, and there’s none of that terrorism going on.”

 

There’s none of that like planning for violence shit that they’re accused of its not actually happening! And because I tried to show that it’s not actually happening, I got censored, completely wiped! So they want and need people to believe that guys in the nationalist community are some sort of violent threat. And anyone who tries to demonstrate that that’s not true is hurting their agenda is completely wiped from the Internet.

 

That’s really eye opening. It should be eye opening. It should be concerning to you if you’re watching this.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think well said.

 

We kind of been going for a while. So I want to move on quickly to the next topic. I want to cover this and then we’ll do the Superchats. So send your Superchats now if you want a question read out.

 

But this happened. This is some of the boys in Adelaide. We were in Adelaide for Hitler’s birthday*, Tom and I, in April. And I’d met some of these guys before at other events, but some of them I hadn’t really met before or hadn’t had much of a chance to speak to. And we got a chance to hang out with them for a few days and they’re good guys.

 

[* Adolf Hitler (20 April 1889 – 30 April 1945) was an Austrian-born German politician who was the dictator of National Socialist Germany from 1933 until his suicide in 1945. He rose to power as the leader of the NS Party, becoming the chancellor in 1933 and then taking the title of Führer und Reichskanzler in 1934.]

 

Anyway, they did a little demonstration. And this is the clip from Seven News, Adelaide of the event. What day was this, Tom? Was it on Sunday or Monday?

 

Thomas Sewell: It was on Monday.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, Monday.

 

Thomas Sewell: A couple guys had a day off work and the other couple that were there, I think they’re uni students. So it was hard to get a full turnout because most of the guys were at work. But that’s when evil strikes when all the men are at work.

 

[2:04:39]

 

 

Joel Davis: Anyway, here’s the clip from the news.

 

 

Andrea Nicolas (7 News): There were frightening scenes here outside the council this morning as parents arrived with their children to attend the school holiday event. Expecting a backlash, the council moved Rainbow Story Time with Drag Queen Fifi Ladouche an hour earlier to 09:00 am. But protesters got wind of the time change.

 

 

Bearded Man: They’re quite happy to let children get groomed while you film me!

Gillian Aldridge (Salisbury Mayor): They all came in really bravely and I was really impressed with them all. One little boy thought they were there especially to cheer him on.

Andrea Nicolas (7 News): There was a heavy police presence as several threats sent the chambers into lockdown. No one was allowed in for several hours while demonstrators condemned the programme being run inside.

Raina Cruise: Imagine a ten year old coming and seeing a man dressed provocatively and he is, as a woman, doing Story Time, then going home and asking, mum:

“Mum, was that a boy, or a girl?”

Stuart Lindsay: We don’t approve of this and we’ll do anything we can to ensure that it stops happening.

Gillian Aldridge (Salisbury Mayor): The Story Time went beautifully. It was lovely. We sang lots of nursery rhymes and clapped our hands to show us you’re happy. It was very pleasant. The books went down really well and children had a lovely, safe time.

Andrea Nicolas (7 News): The council had received more than 100 complaints leading up to today’s event, but maintains it was about promoting diversity.

Gillian Aldridge (Salisbury Mayor): All sorts of people live in Salisbury. Where we care about them all and we include them all. And that’s what it is. We’re an inclusive community.

Andrea Nicolas (7 News): The council isn’t ruling out a similar event in future, but at this stage, there’s nothing in the calendar.

 

 

[2:06:16]

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s interestingly balanced reporting. What do you guys reckon? Like, usually they’re much harsher on the protesters and defending the transgenders in stories like this, but for once they actually went to the protesters for comment. Like, you almost never see that in media these days.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, we’ve obviously protested a lot of Drag Queen Story Hours over the last couple years and we’ve never got a fair crack at the whip like that, where, as you say, it’s pretty 50-50. Maybe it’s slightly more biased towards the state, the local council or whatever, and the event itself, but it’s not too bad.

 

And also the fact that they put images of NSNx activists with their “Destroy Pedo Freaks” banner and they don’t even mention the term “neo-Nazi” once. Oh, it’s just protesters, but they put the images up there. It’s surprisingly normalizing. But I think it indicates, like, a change in attitudes towards the tranny issue. I think the public is obviously on our side. I think pretty much everyone is on our side on this issue.

 

And according to the boys that were there, I spoke to a few of them and obviously so would Tom would have. It’s, you know, they’re part of the organisation and they said they had a really positive response from the other protesters in the community. And they had a lot of good conversation and they were basically welcomed and accepted, seemingly by the normal mums and dads that came down to protest.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think these journalists, if they are given sort of unequivocal evidence or like undeniable evidence that the community is against something, like, how long can they keep ignoring that? Eventually they have to report on it in some objective manner.

 

And hopefully the same happens for the plight of our ethnic community down here in Australia. Like, if they start to see that it’s actually happening, it’s real. The ethnic replacement of traditional Australians is real and it is concerning.

 

But we know that there’s an agenda behind it all that they’re connected to, so maybe not. But I do see a glimmer of hope there. What do you think, is this part of some repatriation? Is there like an old conservative Right-wing element sneaking back into news reporting? I know that you’ve probably spoken about this.

 

Thomas Sewell: No.

 

Joel Davis: I don’t think being against trannies, grooming children is conservative or Right-wing. It’s just basically the opinion of pretty much everyone in society bar a fringe group of freaks that have somehow captured the government, …

 

Thomas Sewell: A [word unclear] majority of Labor Party. That freak. How freaky was that lady? That was the stuff of nightmares!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, she [Mayor] looks like a tranny herself.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, she did. She sold her soul. She was very, very disturbing. The energy. I got very bad vibes.

 

But there was there was a couple speeches made by the boys at the rally, and the audience was very supportive. So the other protesters, the other people that came down, they were, yeah, cheering, clapping. We handed out hundreds of little leaflets explaining what had happened. And a lot of there was a lot of positive commentary, people supporting the NSN presence.

 

So I think to answer your question, Blair, is this like a Right-wing influence creeping into the media? I don’t think so. I think it’s more your first point that at a certain point, it becomes impossible to be disingenuous.

 

I mean, they could try harder, sure, but maybe Seven News Adelaide’s not as hard working as, or as jewish as Seven News Melbourne. That’s probably one. You know, Adelaide is like a big country town, so they’re probably a little bit more objective and a little bit more honest with their reporting. Although they’ve negatively put us in the press in the past.

 

The fact that the NSN, the radical Spearhead of the anti-trans agenda, and then the more conservative and reasonable and also older people, they’re mostly elderly people, are there with the NSN, with the sort of youthful revolutionary vanguard. It is hard for the media to just say, how can the media sit there and say, even though we are actually National Socialists, we are Nazis, the media would struggle to, … Well, it’s not that they would struggle. But imagine, the other version of that news release is the media saying:

 

“And then neo-Nazis counter-protested it!”

 

And, yeah, there is footage of us being there, but then a lot of the footage they would have to use would have, like, elderly people, like grandmas and grandpas saying:

 

“This is unacceptable! I don’t think that this should happen. This shouldn’t be in front of children!”

 

Blair Cottrell: It wouldn’t make sense.

 

Thomas Sewell: It would seem ridiculous!

 

And then the average person on the street or the average person at home on the couch watching it would be like:

 

“Wait a minute, I’m against Drag Queen sore. Am I a Nazi as well? Does the media define me as a Nazi?”

 

And all that would ultimately do on a long enough timeline is create more support for the Nazis.

 

So if they have any hope of holding onto the centre, the smart political decision is to almost kind of just pretend we weren’t there. Yeah, like when we’re together with the broadhead, when we’re together with the community. Maybe the best thing is to just ignore our presence instead of labeling everyone that’s there as a Nazi. Maybe that tactics not working anymore.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s a good point. Definitely!

 

[2:11:54]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: The other thing that was on the leaflet that they handed out was an explanation of the name of the transvestite, the “Fifi Ladouche”. So it’s quite, quite disturbing. “Fifi” had some sort of sexual meaning to it. And then Ladouche, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s what they call a, … How can I say this without seeming vulgar?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, it’s very vulgar, but, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: When the guys are in jail and they’re trying to make what replicates female genitalia for their own private purposes, they do it out of kitchen gloves and moisturizer. They call it “a Fifi”. Yeah, that’s what that’s called. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Well, that’s what was explained in the, … Which I didn’t even know, maybe because I was in solitary confinement!

 

But the other thing, obviously, everyone knows what a douche is and yeah. So what a fucking disturbing name for a child performer, even if they weren’t a transvestite. And the connotations around transvestites getting sex change operations and cutting their penises off and having it inverted into a fake vagina and then needing to douche their vagina every day. Because it’s not a vagina, it’s their fucking anus! It’s like an inverted penis.

 

And then someone called “Fifi Ladouche” is then reading children’s books in front of children. It just keeps getting more and more sickening! And then the boys also said that there was a few mums that came down with their kids and, yeah, the guys just did everything they could to just get in their face and call them disgusting, for what they were doing. But the police were pretty aggressive once they got close to the people coming down.

 

So, imagine the kind of person that brings their small child to visit it. I mean, it’s the ultimate prayer at the altar of Satan, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s very subversive, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, your husband’s at work and then you go down there with your six year old who’s on school holidays or whatever, your eight year old, to go look at a fucking transvestite sex performer! Like, it’s just so messed up!

 

Like these people should be, as Sam Hyde said, as a minimum, you know, it should be electroshock therapy and camps. We got to put these people in camps. That’s the bare minimum rational thing to do.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I think it is. It’s egregiously subversive, too. I’ll just add the fact that they expose themselves to children not just physically, but the words they’re using to describe themselves. The names have strong sexual connotations or are kind of like nicknames, replacement words for genitalia or sex acts. And they’re using those names that, to children, would just seem like playful, fun names. But the children don’t realise, the parents, too, in their naivety and their ignorance, don’t realise that they’re exposing their children to subversive sexual conotations. You know, so that’s part of the grooming process. It’s a very egregious subversion. Very obvious.

 

Joel Davis: So this is some of the video just to get a feel for the event without Seven News images, what the boys did, I thought, I’ll play some of these.

 

NSN Protestors: Ladies and gentlemen, we, of the National Socialist Network, advocate due process and the death penalty for paedophiles! Put to death! Paedophiles! Put to death! Paedophiles! Put to death! Paedophiles! Put to death! Paedophiles!

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that Jimon Roberts Adelaide edition? [chuckling] It’s kind of that sort of energy, isn’t it?

 

NSN Protestors: Paedophiles! Put to death! Paedophiles! Put to death!

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s funny because they butt heads all the time and, like, they’re always staunching each other, but they’re the same person, like, in different form.

 

Blair Cottrell: Which is why they’re staunching each other. Right? [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, that’s funny.

 

Joel Davis: So anyway, to give you an idea that it’s quite staunch that he’s chanting:

 

“Paedophiles put to death! Pedophiles put to death!”

 

And then [chuckling] later the community is like:

 

“Okay, these guys seem kind of cool.”

 

And they seem to be willing to get leaflets and have a chat.

 

[Locals cheering and applauding]

 

NSN member: So we’ve come here from the NSN to protest against the paedophilia that’s happening in this library. Unfortunately, they’ve taken the time back, so we have not been able to encounter the paedophile.

 

Male: He’s got to leave. He’s got to leave. He has to leave.

 

NSN member: He’s in this building, there is a groomer. Grooming children! We can’t [words unclear] And the police here are protecting this paedophile.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s a line in there. There’s a line in there what one of the guys says, and it just demonstrates how effective this kind of activism is at generating an appeal, or a pipeline to mainstream Australian workers, because the guy literally just says:

 

“Yeah, I don’t like pedos either!”

 

And basically what he’s saying is:

 

“There’s a group of nazis over there. They don’t like paedophiles. Yeah, I don’t like paedophiles either. I’ll join these guys!”

 

That’s [chuckling] basically what the tone of that suggested.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, we’ll be in the same camp. Well, what, the Adelaide guys are just messaging me now because they’re watching the stream live. They’re just saying to me that there was an incident. They’re trying to look for footage of it. We won’t be able to get it up tonight, but some of the old ladies, some of the women that were at the protest, obviously on our side, went up to one of the female cops and got in her face and called her an “enabler”, saying:

 

“You’re enabling paedophilia!”

 

And the female cop started crying.

 

So I don’t have footage to link you that straight away, but they’re looking through it now to try to find it so we can upload it. We didn’t make the cop cry, but the other protesters made the made the cop cry when she was called an enabler.

 

So that’s very interesting as well. First police officer that actually has any real emotions and empathy and any sense of compassion for what they’re actually doing. Or, sorry, responsibility, because most cops are just ZOG bots. They just give you the [word unclear] rights there when you explain to them what they’re doing.

 

So that’s actually the first time I’ve ever heard of a cop, you know, innately expressing their emotion not being able to hide what they are doing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Actually thinking about what they’re doing instead of just thinking about the wage that they’re making.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think it’s a bit different when a granny is telling them off, then when it’s one of us. When it’s one of us, they kind of feel more defensive:

 

“Oh, this guy is just a hateful, mean Nazi! I don’t have to listen to him!”

 

But then when it’s like, grandma, it’s kind of like, well, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Grandma Waffen!

 

 

Joel Davis: Yes, you kind of have to listen to grandma!

 

[2:19:26]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, she has the wisdom! The wisdom of age. She’s the crone of the community.

 

Joel Davis: We were talking before about women. You know, women don’t know what. Like, you listen to grandmas. Grandmas, they’re actually gold.

 

Thomas Sewell: We have the best grandmas! Our grandmas make gold.

 

Joel Davis: If one of you, if one or hopefully both of your grandmothers are still alive, people watching, if you’re young, hopefully both of them are still alive. Mine is still alive, thankfully. God bless them! Talk to them! Particularly about the good old days and blah, blah, blah. There’s a lot there. There’s a lot of value there.

 

But anyway, yeah, this was another one of the videos that they sent me. This kind of just shows that the public seem quite fine with them. They were saying that the “paedophile put to death” chant that some of the grandmas started joining in at one point.

 

So the staunch method ended up paying dividends. It’s just good. It’s just good to see people that are pretty openly National Socialist taking an easyW on an issue. I mean, everyone agrees that trannies grooming kids is fucked! And turns out normal people realise that we’re obviously the good side, even despite all the connotations. So interesting course of events. And we’ve had positive reactions that other, from the public, probably even by probably our standards, surprisingly positive reactions from members of the public and other demonstrations that we’ve done over in recent memory.

 

Blair Cottrell: The chant isn’t necessarily, how should I say, it’s really going to resonate with people because ordinary people are quite brutal. They’re more receptive to black and white than they are to grey.

 

What I mean is if this guy was saying:

 

“You know, paedophiles should be fined.”

 

People would be like:

 

“Yeah, …”

 

Thomas Sewell: Harsher punishments, mandatory sentencing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, no one gets jeered up by that it’s like you’ll find if you say:

 

“Let’s fine this person or let’s give this person community order!”

 

People will be like:

 

“Err, …”

 

But if you’re like:

 

“Let’s destroy this person! Let’s exterminate this person for what they’ve done!”

 

Then ordinary people are like:

 

“Yeah!”

 

Joel Davis: If we had a referendum on reintroducing the death penalty just for paedophiles, it would win in a landslide.

 

Blair Cottrell: Hundred percent. Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: But meanwhile they get like sentences from our fucked up justice system of like literally two, three, four years in prison and then they get out on 18 months of good behaviour. It’s fucking disgusting!

 

Anyway, I’m going to go through some of these Superchats because we’ve been streaming for a while. 308 A-Okay, said:

 

“Thoughts on Christian nationalism. How important do you think faith is to fascism and nationalism? Thanks for the show.”

 

I’ll give my quick thoughts on this. Obviously, this is a very large subject, so I’m not going to give my complete thoughts on this, but my view is that the idea of Christian nationalism is itself, it doesn’t really make sense. Like, you could say that a nation, like, say, for example, the nation of Britain, that Anglicanism is the, or at least Protestant Christianity is the religion of Britain and that they should teach it to children in schools and that it should be like kind of part of the culture of the country and they should celebrate Christian days and so on.

 

Yeah, like that obviously makes sense. Like, that is the religion of that country and so that should be respected.

 

But the way that it’s used often, in particular in the American context, is that America is a Christian nation. Like, as if that is what defines being an American. Not anything to do with blood, not anything to do with ethnicity or race. And obviously I reject that.

 

I mean, the word nationalism means fundamentally, like, etymologically a people of shared ancestry, a people of shared birth, of shared origin. Obviously shared religion and shared culture. These are all characteristics of a nation. But you can’t, like, if you try to take those things out of shared ancestry and say nations are just a shared culture or just a shared religion, then you’re no longer talking about nationalism. So it really depends what you mean. Like, if you’re just saying:

 

“Oh, Australia is a historically Christian nation and that should be respected or Britain is or whatever.”

 

Then yes, like, that’s obviously true. As to how important do you think faith is to fascism and nationalism? Fascism, I mean, faith is important, but Christianity specifically, I don’t think it’s necessarily important to fascism. You can see fascism as a secular ideology or as a non-Christian ideology in certain instantiations. There’s nothing inherently Christian about fascism, although it can be made compatible with Christianity, as it has been in certain contexts.

 

Think about, like the Romanians under Codreanu, for example, like the Iron Guard. That was obviously a very Christian form of fascism, but it isn’t necessarily the case. So faith the idea of fascism, is having faith in the nation, faith in the state, like the idea of the state as an embodiment of the will of the people, which people have to give their will, give their faithfulness and their commitment to the nation for it to gain strength, to be able to define its own destiny in the world. I mean, that’s obviously true, but I don’t think that’s really what you’re asking.

 

So I guess my view on Christians in the movement is Christians should be included in the movement, obviously, but I don’t think the movement should be exclusively Christian. The movement has to be inclusive to White people of non-Christian beliefs. It just has to.

 

And the majority of White people aren’t practicing Christians. You might be able to say a lot of White people will say that they’re Christian, but very, very few actually practice Christianity.

 

So you can’t have a movement to represent our people that limits itself to Christianity. Because a large, if you go to any church now in a Western country, a very large portion of the congregation are non-Whites. So to create a Christian identitarianism, I think, is a mistake. As a result of that, I’m a racial identitarian.

 

But, yeah, that’s basically my view.

 

[2:26:08]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: I agree. I’m in 100% agreement. This is why, despite having a Catholic upbringing, not a strong one, but moderate Catholic, probably less than moderate Catholic upbringing, I’ve never really publicly declared myself a Christian, or a Catholic, because I know that that doesn’t appeal to everyone, and it’s not really central to my identity as much as my race is central to my identity. Like, my race is really who I am, more so than my religious associations.

 

So, yeah, agreed.

 

Joel Davis: Uh, Tom, do you want to weigh in? Prefer no comment? Southern Fried 33. He said:

 

“Destroy the libtards!”

 

That’s obviously in relation to what Tom and I were discussing before Blair jumped on, where basically Blair, there was a lot of controversy. I don’t know if you saw it on Right-wing Twitter, because some American libtards who were basically conservatives were going after Leftists that had posted on social media pro-assassination comments like:

 

“Oh, next time, don’t miss! And I wish Trump got shot, blah, blah, blah.”

 

And a few of them got fired from their jobs. And there was a debate on Right-wing Twitter as to whether this was good or bad, because shouldn’t we be against cancel culture and so on.

 

But then I think my view was fuck libtards! Like, they’ve been complicit in Covid.

 

Blair Cottrell: They should consider themselves lucky if that’s all that happens, because I think they should have even worse consequences. But, yeah, fire them from their jobs, great! That’s what they’re doing to us. Do it back to them and more! Like, that’s my opinion.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. We’re all in agreement on that. Apollonian JL said:

 

“Did you see those gypos – He’s referring to gypsies – and Muslims rioting in England. Liberals and Muslims on Twitter tried blaming it on quote, unquote, ‘Romanians’, LOL! Maybe those National Front guys were onto something all those years ago?”

 

They were. The gypsies and Muslims rioting, I did see that. I did see Mark Collett talking about it and a few of the other English accounts talking about it. I didn’t really weigh in too much into the story because my head’s been a little bit in American politics land the last few days, and then I got so sucked into American politics land for a few days that I needed a palate cleanse. And so I spent about 3 hours today watching Hitler speeches!

 

So, yeah, I didn’t really follow [chuckling] the story too closely, but I did see a tweet from that Suleiman Ahmed piece of shit who is prominent in the pro-Palestine movement, who’s some Paki who lives in England, basically saying that:

 

“Yeah, gypsies are Romanians, and therefore it was some kind of anti-Romanian or anti-European, response to be against gypsies.”

 

When gypsies are racially like Indian, basically, for people that don’t know. There are obviously Irish Travelers and things like this which are racially European, but the actual gypsies are literally Indian immigrants into Europe. They aren’t racially the same as the Whites. Maybe they have a little bit of White blood that has mixed in, but they aren’t White.

 

So, yeah, kind of ridiculous to call them Romanians. We can talk about the wog question, but Romanians are not the same thing as gypsies. There’s a lot of gypsies in Romania because a lot of them came into Romania, but they’re completely different ethnically and racially.

 

But, yeah, I think that my take on, without really knowing much about the story on the Muslims rioting is this is what happens when you bring in a fifth column that has its own kind of political views that are totally different in its own culture, and it has a kind of robust assertion of itself where it wants to kind of take over your society and it wants to assert itself over its own communities. And obviously, Islam is a very robust worldview with religion, politics, identity, all basically within one very rigid religious identity. It’s not like Christianity, for example, which, kind of leaves politics and race and all these things kind of outside of its purview to various degrees, depending on your denomination. Islam is a far more cohesive ideology.

 

And so when you let them into your country, they’re eventually going to take over communities, they’re going to start running the communities based upon their own norms and standards. And they’re going to disrespect law enforcement from the state. They’re going to openly disrespect the state, which has been treating them with kids gloves because of the ideology of multiculturalism and all this bullshit, this anti-White bullshit that has been perpetrated on the British people by the State for decades.

 

So why would they respect the state? Why would they respect law and order? The only solution to the Islam problem in Britain is mass deportation. Just as simple as that!

 

Anyway, I’m sure you guys agree with those, but I don’t know if did you guys see that story at all? I don’t actually know too much about it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Have you guys ever met a Romanian?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I met one on the weekend.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, interesting. Well, the only one I can remember meeting was inside prison when I was younger. Very naturally exploitative people. It took a while to get it out of him why he was in prison. Like, I was really interested why he was in prison, how? Because he was actually from Romania with the accent and everything.

 

And he eventually admitted that even though he had signed a document with Australian intelligence swearing that he wouldn’t tell anyone why he was in jail. He was in jail for ATM forking, which involves creating a device shaped like a large fork, which can be jammed into Australian ATM’s and tricks the ATM into emptying out all its cash!

 

And that’s why he was in jail and he was to be deported immediately at the end of his sentence. And he was never to tell anyone how he made the device. And he wrote, he signed a piece of paper with Australian intelligence swearing he would never, never tell anyone. That was the only Romanian guy I ever met.

 

So, yeah, I think that lifestyle appeals to them.

 

Joel Davis: Pretty impressive!

 

Thomas Sewell: Fuck ZOG!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think it’s pretty impressive.

 

I mean, that’s a crafty little Romanian. But yeah, Romania is, because that’s been a place of conflict historically, particularly between Christendom and Islam trying to invade Europe over the years and also the collapse of the Byzantine empire and in general, and all the kind of ethnic chaos that ensued from that and so on.

 

Romania is not that racially homogenous. So you do have some Romanians that are kind of Germanic, some that are quite Slavic, some that are quite woggish. They look like they’re from the Balkans or some of the women from Romania even look like Latinas. You would think that they’re a Latina, but actually they’re Romanian.

 

But anyway, there’s one more Superchat here from Nicotine Nationalist. Shout out to Nicotine, who said:

 

“Thoughts on the efficacy of street level activism versus think tank type institutional takeover?”

 

I’m just going to say straight off the bat, I think both of these things are necessary. Any functional political movement that is capable of exercising power in the contemporary political context has both of these elements. So I don’t see it as a dichotomy. What do you guys think?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I think “versus” is the wrong question. It’s different horses for different courses.

 

So if you’re 18 to 25 and you’re fit and you’re healthy and you want to get involved with activism, get involved with activism. Obviously, there’s guys of all ages involved in activism, but that’s the primary demographic.

 

Whereas if you’re 65 years old, you’re a multimillionaire, you have huge assets, resources, networks, you’re involved in all sorts of different groups, and you have friends of a similar kind of stock. You’re not going to be marching down the street with NSN holding a banner saying, “destroy Pedo freaks”, are you? You’re going to be thinking in a back room with other people that are probably millionaires or very wealthy, and you’re going to work out a way of:

 

“Well, why don’t we make a legal team, or a legal lobby that can defend these activists, like how the Left-wing have their activists, and we don’t want to do activism. But notice they’ve always got a legal team that defends them. And also they have legal teams that go after and lobby the government or lobby the courts or lobby the police, but say that we’re going to sue the police if you don’t prosecute this person for a hate crime. And maybe we should do that the next time a White person gets murdered?”

 

You know, if I was 65 and I was a millionaire and I had a legal background, that’s what I would be doing. I wouldn’t be marching through the street with a banner that says, “destroy pedo freaks”.

 

So it’s not really this or that, it’s everything. We should do everything. And so every person that has our views should consider:

 

“Well, what are my skills? What kind of person am I? What age am I in? Where’s my energy directed at?”

 

And then do it! Because we’ve got all the ideas. There’s infinite ideas! And our organisation alone has 10,000 ideas, has more ideas than men. And there’s dozens of organisations across the country and networks, and if, yeah, you should work out which one sort of suits you. And no one takes offence if someone joins me and says:

 

“Hey, Tom, look, this just isn’t for me. I think I’m going to go do this instead.”

 

I say:

 

“Please do that! Please actually go and do that! Don’t talk about it. Actually go and do it!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Something significant just occurred to me as you were speaking then. It’s that we don’t need 20 men with 10,000 ideas. We need 10,000 men with one idea. That’s how you win. Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And look, even though I’ve got an aggressive personality, so I’m a bit soft on the public activism and the shit stirring. Yeah, I think there’s a place for both these activities. Tom used to say:

 

“Let a thousand flowers blossom!”

 

And it means, obviously, let each flower, let each stem grow at its own rate, in its own field, in its own way. It doesn’t all have to be concentrated into one type of one method or all of your political energy.

 

So. Yeah, I’m in agreement with you guys on that one, too.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s not actually my quote, by the way, but I do say it all the time. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: I first heard it from you, so.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I first heard it from Jim Salem.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, there you go. Yeah, wise old man. He’s part of the hive mind still, maybe.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Well, it’s a common. It’s a common phrase, but.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. I think Mao said it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Golf Lover sent a $14.88 Superchat, which I always appreciate, said:

 

“Great shows lately, even from an optimistic perspective, Whites won’t be able to maintain Oy Vey power over all of our nations around the world, which formerly White nation will become a totally lost cause, first. Surely a mass Exodus of Whites could potentially bolster the cause in other nations.”

 

I don’t really like this kind of mentality. I think we should basically be staunch and demand all of our shit back! I don’t necessarily mean regaining all of our former colonial empires. I’m not opposed to that. I mean, in terms of the places that were ours, which I define as obviously Europe, in addition to North America, like United States and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the South African Cape. You could say:

 

“Well, that’s cucked because I don’t want to take Rhodesia back or something.”

 

So maybe that’s a lost cause. I don’t know.

 

But I’m actually fine with taking Rhodesia back.

 

But I mean, as like, a basic minimum demand. I would say that those would be the minimum demands. And you could say:

 

“Well, why do we need to take the Cape back?”

 

I think a Volkstart in the Cape is necessary. Like, White settlers, mostly from Holland, but also from other European countries, were actually the original settlers of the land there. It was pretty uninhabited. And the Zulus that came in actually came into the eastern side of South Africa, or what is now known as South Africa, around the same time that the first White settlers were getting there and basically genocided the natives of South Africa. And then ended up confronting the Whites and having wars with the Whites.

 

So the Zulus that are now the largest black demographic in South Africa are just as illegitimate, you could say, as the Whites, if you want to play that game. But they didn’t even get to the Cape first.

 

So I would say a Volkstart, but then some people would say:

 

“Well, we should just get the White South Africans over to Australia and America to help us fight here, because it’s a bit of a lost cause and we’re not really able to help them because we don’t have control of our own countries.”

 

And you could say that’s strategically reasonable. But I don’t think you really talk about South Africa. You probably want me to say, let’s abandon America or let’s abandon Australia or something. And I just don’t think that that’s on the table.

 

Even if we can’t completely ethnically cleanse these places, we need to take back political power. We need to take back our own spaces in North America, and we need to take back some political power in North America because it’s so important, globally, strategically, to have power in North America, because America is the most powerful country in the world. And that’s for a reason. It’s because of its geography. It’s not just by accident that a really powerful superpower could build itself in North America.

 

So I think abandoning, just all moving back to Europe is just unacceptable. Europe is resource poor. It is actually quite a small space, considering. I think there’s probably just as many Whites living outside of Europe as there are non-Whites within Europe. And Europe is pretty crowded as it is.

 

So I think we have expanded successfully and we should demand to keep our settler, our settled colonies.

 

But, yeah, what do I think? Probably the worst situation is? It’s really a toss up between here and Canada, probably.

 

But having said that, you could almost say Britain is almost worse because of the level of anti-White, the level of authoritarianism from the state, and the level of anti-White saturation in their culture, in their political system. You could almost say that it’s worse in Britain than it is here. But at the same time, because it’s like a native land, it seems harder to lose, and it’s also totally unacceptable. We could just simply never accept losing Britain. I mean, that would be absurd! We’d have to fight for it at some point. I think we will.

 

But, yeah, I think, obviously the colonies would be more likely to be abandoned first than the homeland, or our ancestral homeland.

 

But I think we’re far stronger and far better off keeping the colonies and taking them back. And if we build the consciousness to take back Europe, that same consciousness can be used to take back the colonies. I don’t see a scenario where we could take back Europe and just not be racist enough to take back North America and Australia.

 

[2:41:55]

 

Blair Cottrell: Good spiel.

 

Joel Davis: You guys want to, …

 

Thomas Sewell: White revolution is the only solution!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, basically, I want it all fucking back! And maybe we should. Once we get it all back, we should probably take some fucking more, considering how they’ve all treated us. We’ll save that for.

 

Blair Cottrell: What does Lincoln Rockwell say?

 

Joel Davis: That’s what my grandson’s to work out. Yeah, I’m gonna take it back! Yeah. It’s been a long stream. I hope everyone enjoyed.

 

Thomas Sewell: Night.

 

Joel Davis: Good night Tom. Good night to everyone at home.

 

Thomas Sewell: Good night, fellow racists. And the [words unclear] that aren’t racist yet.

 

Joel Davis: I don’t think any of them are really watching the show.

 

Thomas Sewell: See you. Bye.

 

vv See bro.

 

Joel Davis: But, Blair, while you’re here, what’s your Twitter handle? Your new Twitter?

 

Blair Cottrell: Uh, it’s not a great one. It’s B, underscore Cottrell. My full name, COTTRELL89. The old one was BCOTTRELL89, so I just added it on an underscore. I could probably think of a better one, but that’s what it is for now. Maybe I’ll just keep it at that.

 

But it’s in the process of getting verified. It’s taking a long time, so it should be verified within the next few days, I hope. Hopefully within the week. So then I’ll get that little blue tick, and I’ll look more official, and all of my posts will be more official. Because I think being a paid up verified X user does make you more official in current political climate. So I’m looking forward to that.

 

And I’m sorry I was late today, I, but I’m glad I still jumped on the end and, yeah, caught the tail end of the stream. It was great to be involved, as always. Thanks everybody for tuning in. Thanks to Joel for hosting it and doing such a great job. He’s the heart and soul of the stream, as always. And I suppose if there’s nothing else, Joel, I’ll see you guys next week.

 

Joel Davis: Like I said at the beginning of the show, it’s my fault we didn’t stream last night, which would have suited you better, so it’s not your fault you had to jump on late. Thanks for jumping on anyway, and it made the stream better, and yeah, thanks everyone, for watching.

 

We had like, across the three platforms, like 750 peak viewers at one point, so show gets a good view, viewership. There’s like 10,000 views every stream on Rumble now, just on Rumble, a few thousand more on other platforms.

 

So the show, despite the platforming from YouTube, is doing well. It keeps growing, and I really appreciate the audience supporting the show. Share it with your friends, you know, clip it up. There was a time in which the show was getting clipped more, and I was seeing it all over Twitter, I was seeing it all over TikTok. That’s kind of died off. So what’s happened to the clippers? Like, pick your game up, clip the show more, help us spread the show, help us spread the clips. Yeah, follow Blair on Twitter and yeah, we’ll see you all next week.

 

[2:45:02]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/24/2024 = 66)

AllegianceMountain
4 days ago
Best content on Rumble, blood and honor!
20 likes

Rockwell1488Pierce
4 days ago
Follow Joel and Blair on twitter, Tom on (telegram) https://twitter.com/joeldavisx https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell https://x.com/b_cottrell89
15 likes

BasedFarmer
4 days ago
cheers from USA lads
12 likes

Relikt
4 days ago
Love you guys but you are wrong about Trump and the Theil owned guys like Tucker. They are not our guys and they are not for us. The nat socs in America have enough to deal with trying to wrangle our own retards into understanding that, Fuentes, Warren, JFG, Spencer, Collett, Striker, Borzoi, etc have the correct take on it. It’s false hope to think Trump’s victory is us winning.
9 likes

‹ Hide 5 replies
Relikt
4 days ago
How about we stop supporting Jewish factions and their figureheads. Trump works for Jews not for white people how is this still a discussion
6 likes

joeldavisx
Admin
3 days ago
I feel like you weren’t listening properly, we quite clearly aren’t Trump supporters. We were trying to analyse things quite objectively as foreigners, as American politics has such a large impact upon Australia – particularly in regards to rising tensions with China.
4 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
Relikt
3 days ago
Ok cool, sorry if I was unfair. You 3 are incredible dude Australia is lucky to have and I often wish y’all were Americans. 0/
3 likes

katana17
3 days ago
I’ve got a transcript up of the video, so you can check, …) [Joel Davis – Trump Inevitable, Blair Censored, Paedo Freaks Destroyed – Jul 19, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/07/20/joel-davis-trump-inevitable-blair-censored-paedo-freaks-destroyed-jul-19-2024-transcript/
0 likes

Delete
AMDagEuropathelastbattleDOTnet
4 days ago
I don’t think you were listening properly
1 like

KYgail
2 days ago
A win for Trump is a win for isreal/jews. Trump NEVER defends the white race. He defends every race but the White population.
1 like

AMDagEuropathelastbattleDOTnet
4 days ago
We’ve officially reached level idiocracy in America.
6 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
ADC789
4 days ago
Could you imagine a Liberal Party or One Nation conference where they put on stage some idiot Boomer relic like Angry Anderson or Merv Hughes to amp up the vibe? Hulk Hogan WTF is that.
3 likes

AMDagEuropathelastbattleDOTnet
4 days ago
Trump loves the Jews but he’s not a supporter of what’s happening in Gaza or the greater Israel project, from what I can tell. Why has Nikki Haley been hanging around for the last couple of years even though she has almost zero support? It’s almost as if by some miracle, something would have changed, and her wanting to “glass” Gaza would be all of the support ZOG would need
1 like

Motion937
3 days ago
No. The blacks were not included in the founding of the USA. They were property that other blacks sold to whites. It was never about blacks at all. The USA is White Christian identity with other cultures mixing in with that. There has just been a ridiculous anti-white, white guilt sentiment being pushed onto us. It is not organic.
6 likes

AngloAmerican777
4 days ago
Cheers from America
4 likes

EnglandAwake
4 days ago
These are my name recommendations: AUSTRALIAN OBSERVATIONS ARYAN OBSERVATIONS ARYAN OBSERVATORY ANGLO OBSERVATORY ANGLO LIBERATION
4 likes

TheShowgun
SubSupporter
3 days ago
Absolute banger of a show boys. And Blair showing up afterall was the cherry on top!
4 likes

R3dPill3d
Supporter++
3 days ago
This show is great, gentlemen.
4 likes

ProvingNihil
3 days ago
Facts guy’s facts! As an American Nationalist America has definitely become a clown show it’s embarrassing, I’m sometimes ashamed of being an American. This country has gotten so bad, that I believe there isn’t any fixing to it.
4 likes

Nickdorshimer
4 days ago
based stream gents
2 likes

ADC789
4 days ago
Only way is to align with a major religious group. Latin Mass Catholics blowing up In the suburbs.
1 like

› Show 1 reply
ProvingNihil
4 days ago
Ahhh dude’s I’m so hyped about this, definitely gonna listen too this while driving.
1 like

BradC1988
3 days ago
Destroy Paedo Freaks!
1 like

ClassicalFash
2 days ago
cheers from the economic zone called fake canada
1 like

MelancholyMonkey
2 days ago
Great steam, gents. Never stop giving ’em hell. Deus vult.
1 like

GoodGame12
2 days ago
Great stream. 14 o7
1 like

MelancholyMonkey
2 days ago
Blair could be the template for a classically handsome Aryan man.
1 like

FreedomFighter8888888888
4 days ago
Crooks guy is MK Ultra.
0 likes

FreedomFighter8888888888
4 days ago
Fuck X, it’s not a FREE SPEECH PLAYFORM, Elon workd for The Deep State=The jew elites, X has hired an Israeli firm to collect data on users of X. Blair should fuck X off completely, ALL Jew owned social media outlets cannot be trusted. Jew tube as well cannot be trusted. Another bullshit anti FREE SPEECH, censorship is what jews do best.
0 likes

ADC789
4 days ago
I loved how Blair could come on and truly believe he has found out Biden dropped out days ago. Nobody cared, most people are probably thinking that. Talk about being of no consequence at all and people are taking America seriously still?
0 likes

CrazyRecluse
4 days ago
guys where do u get your unpasteurized milk? im in NSW.
0 likes

palacepony
Supporter
4 days ago
Trans- humanist freak mayor Gillian Aldridge has a son, Mark, who stirs the pot for sovereign causes and may appear to be opposite to his mother. Salisbury, like Onkaparinga, Prospect and probably all local councils, are not to be trusted and must be constantly monitored for implementing the new totalitaria.
0 likes

Motion937
3 days ago
It was not incompetence. It was intentional. Incompetence is just the useful way they will have to cover their tracks. Not guarding that roof was absolutely planned. People pointed out the shooter several minutes before he shot. There was plenty of time to get Trump off the stage. Police & SS ignored the people warning them. That was flat out caught on video by several different people. No way out of it. Mayorkas sent these buffoons. Trump turned his head at the right moment. He is alive by the grace of God.
0 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
cybertec69
2 days ago
Your man made sky fairy had NOTHING to do with it.
0 likes

Sinagoglies
20 hours ago
Fake Assassination Attempt on Trump HTTPS://WWW.BITCHUTE.COM/VIDEO/IPK5TXCYJBVO Source: https://youtu.be/ALiHBzvR-mo?si=qG12sWGmd8PdrAjx Vax daddy IsraHELL First (not America) TRUMP STAGES HIS HEAD WOUND https://old.bitchute.com/channel/OSptoVV4rN0M/ https://old.bitchute.com/video/iVtzRnMHFVU9/ 36 Odd “Coincidences” Involving Trump in Popular Culture https://www.bitchute.com/video/rJ9GLQOZFGdy TRUMP SERVANT OF BAAL, & THE GATE & ARCH OF BAAL, ABORTION, SACRIFICE & GENOCIDE IN THE US UNIPARTY https://old.bitchute.com/video/AisK1Xhplo0E/ Trump: “Bring Back The Death Penalty” For Antisemitism https://www.bitchute.com/video/8vieMXIVdEyq
0 likes

SneedMcChuck
3 days ago
do you know what “noahidism” is? it’s basically christianity but without jesus. maybe trump is leading people into that
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Sinagoglies
4 hours ago
NOAHIDE LAWS, KABBALAH, & THE ONE WORLD RELIGION https://www.bitchute.com/video/LDY6Eosh990/ The Satanic Jew New World Order laws turning innocents into terrorists! NOAHIDE LAWS AND DECAPITATION FOR CONFESSING JESUS IS LORD “IT IS IN FACT, THE LUBAVITCH JEWISH MOVEMENT OF WHICH THE NWO IS BASED” http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/noahide_laws.htm RABBIS DISCUSS THEIR PLANS FOR WHITE CHRISTIAN GENOCIDE https://www.bitchute.com/video/Wt4cLIffeHsV/ This man has a script of the trump assassination attempt three months before it happened https://www.bitchute.com/video/bYasFpyeU0Ds TRUMPS KID SHOOTER DRAGS HUGE LADDER ACROSS THE GRASSY KNOLL https://old.bitchute.com/video/UvHh42fnKdcq/ FAKE ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT ON TRUMP HTTPS://WWW.BITCHUTE.COM/VIDEO/DPCZJYUGNKAR Fake and ghay. Oh boy, has it galvanised the Trump train! shows Trump doing the Commie fist in the air. Predictive programming – j depp, martin sheen film, madonna @ 3.000 “Wait wait take my photo” Fake Assassination Attempt on Trump HTTPS://WWW.BITCHUTE.COM/VIDEO/IPK5TXCYJBVO Source: https://youtu.be/ALiHBzvR-mo?si=qG12sWGmd8PdrAjx Gun man was not aiming at Trump Vax daddy IsraHELL First (not America) TRUMP STAGES HIS HEAD WOUND https://old.bitchute.com/channel/OSptoVV4rN0M/ https://old.bitchute.com/video/iVtzRnMHFVU9/ 36 Odd “Coincidences” Involving Trump in Popular Culture https://www.bitchute.com/video/rJ9GLQOZFGdy TRUMP SERVANT OF BAAL, & THE GATE & ARCH OF BAAL, ABORTION, SACRIFICE & GENOCIDE IN THE US UNIPARTY https://old.bitchute.com/video/AisK1Xhplo0E/ Trump: “Bring Back The Death Penalty” For Antisemitism https://www.bitchute.com/video/8vieMXIVdEyq
0 likes

jdschuhlein
3 days ago
Nice to hear such accurate takes on current events here in the US. Also, you’ve unwittingly created a new hashtag: #grannywaffen!
0 likes

katana17
3 days ago
[Joel Davis – Trump Inevitable, Blair Censored, Paedo Freaks Destroyed – Jul 19, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/07/20/joel-davis-trump-inevitable-blair-censored-paedo-freaks-destroyed-jul-19-2024-transcript/
0 likes

Delete
Varkhond
3 days ago
Detp
0 likes

Hawkeye102
3 days ago
Roof top in direct line of sight about 130 yards from Trump and NO SECRET SERVICE guarding it.
0 likes

ClassicalFash
3 days ago
nice to see the show again. haven’t watched since they were banned on Yt
0 likes

TangoRomeoAU
2 days ago
Based
0 likes

RedYokes
2 days ago
Tom makes the show worth watching tbh. Yeah he isn’t too intellectual but he’s so naturally based and always has something interesting to say.
0 likes

KYgail
2 days ago
America is stupid, Their Cowards Their Brainwashed Their Pathetic It’s Humiliating They won’t fight their way out of a paper bag..
0 likes

ZRWJ
Supporter
2 days ago
My theory is that Trump genuinely caused a rift within the ruling class, and that his attempted assassination was one faction trying to take out the other faction’s main guy.
0 likes

ADC789
2 days ago
The whole Jeet love in makes a lot more sense now. Tom nailed it.
0 likes

EVROPAEAESTHETICA
16 hours ago
I oppose the doxxing and firing of the libtards who publicly wished the assassination attempt on Trump was successful. Not because I oppose doxxing as a tool. It’s a losing strategy to not use effective methods against your enemies that you use against you. I oppose it on the grounds that Trump isn’t our guy. A lot of people in our own sphere probably wished the same to end the fake nationalism that absorbs energies we should be receiving. We shouldn’t be out to get all libtards fired, only those who attack us.
0 likes

HeartsofLions
10 hours ago
You really do bash on women and Americans. Could you please cool it with the negativity.
0 likes

EnglandAwake
4 days ago
I believe the late arrivals from the Pale Of Settlement and the ones dethroned by Putin have a slight ideological divergence with the Jews that inhabitated Angloshere/Germany. The faction involved in the Trump assassination is the former, they have an ambition to destroy Russia first and made big bets on Ukraine. The latter see Israel as the main priority and the maintenance of their global empire. The problem is their interests converge in destroying BRICS, so Trump is surrounded by scorpions ready to sting if he makes the wrong move against Russia.
-1 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
PeroErcegovac
3 days ago
Putin and Medvedev and their oligarchs are Jews, and Bolshevik Jews at that. Nice try.
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
EnglandAwake
2 days ago
What are you trying to imply exactly (“Nice try”)? I dont believe Jews have the level of control in Russia or any of the BRICS nations today, like they have in the west. They definitely dont have control over China, North Korea and Iran. If you believe they do you are nuts. Why do you think the west is collectively at war with Russia?
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Sinagoglies
1 day ago
JEWS CELEBRATING THE BROTHER WAR BETWEEN RUSSIA AND UKRAINE. https://www.bitchute.com/video/0u8xZf7zF7qV/ The Allies have always collaborated with Soviet Russia – nothing has changed! https://fitzinfo.net/2021/04/22/jewish-dominance-from-the-ussr-to-todays-russian-federation/amp/ VLADIMIR PUTIN & HIS FAKE ENEMIES FOR THE HOLOHOAX RELIGION https://www.bitchute.com/video/ml5aMHe0s2Ec/ Russia Vs Ukraine – Jew Vladimir Putin Vs Jew Volodymyr Zelensky https://www.goyimtv.tv/v/2656608997/Russia-Vs-Ukraine—Jew-Vladimir-Putin-Vs-Jew-Volodymyr-Zelensky https://www.theburkean.ie/articles/2023/09/30/poland-packs-it-in-ukraine-is-not-ready-for-the-long-war#comment-27432 Ukrainian speaks on jews on both sides: https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/the-quot-nazis-quot-in-ukraine-are-jews_FbbQpb7idPulU29.html Joint Statement on Counterterrorism Cooperation Joint Statement by President George W. Bush and President Vladimir V. Putin on Counterterrorism Cooperation https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/05/text/20020524-5.html USA builds military for Soviet Union https://alor.org/Storage/Library/PDF/Sutton_AC_national_suicide.pdf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_imagery_during_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War#/media/File:День_Победы_в_Сакском_районе,_2022,_33.jpg Moscow chief rabbi: Trump ‘good news’ for US, Russia, and Israel http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/220393 PUTIN MAY NOT BE GOOD FOR RUSSIA, BUT HE IS GOOD FOR THE JEWS OF RUSSIA https://www.bitchute.com/video/3buEy56bWnvI/ https://www.jpost.com/International/Netanyahu-meets-Putin-in-Moscow-attends-victory-day-ceremony-555925
0 likes
cybertec69
3 days ago
Really, LMAO. You brainwashed religious nut jobs are the special kind of stupid, not just stupid, but the special kind of stupid. Religions cloud the mind with utter nonsense. Religions turn people into blathering idiots, like yourself. Religions destroy any and all critical thinking faculties. It’s how the jew controls you gullible mindless dumbed down goyim. https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/08/christianity-the-great-jewish-hoax/ The Dead Sea Scrolls And The Essene Origins Of Christianity Part 1. https://odysee.com/@Christendumb2:0/The-Dead-Sea-Scrolls-and-the-Essene-Origins-of-Christianity-Part-1:2?r=T6mDza7fddhwU6vEshWK1tVvBzcPeL7R Part 2. https://odysee.com/@Christendumb2:0/The-Dead-Sea-Scrolls-and-the-Essene-Origins-of-Christianity-Part-2:2 Part 3. https://odysee.com/@Christendumb2:0/The-Dead-Sea-Scrolls-and-the-Essene-Origins-of-Christianity-Part-3:6 Multiple Messiahs Through The Centuries Part 1. https://odysee.com/@Christendumb2:0/Multiple-Messiahs-Through-the-Ages-Part-1:5?r=T6mDza7fddhwU6vEshWK1tVvBzcPeL7R Part 2. https://odysee.com/@Christendumb2:0/Multiple-Messiahs-Through-the-Ages-Part-2:0 Part 3. https://odysee.com/@Christendumb2:0/Multiple-Messiahs-Through-the-Ages-Part-3:a The Jewish Hand In The World Wars. https://odysee.com/@Fascist-Freddy:1/The-Jewish-Hand-in-The-World-Wars-%28-2019%29:f?r=T6mDza7fddhwU6vEshWK1tVvBzcPeL7R
-1 likes

‹ Hide 3 replies
ProvingNihil
3 days ago
You’ll wake up one day, hell I use to be an Atheist, until something spiritual happened within my life that changed my view’s.
0 likes

› Show 2 replies
Sinagoglies
4 hours ago
Adolf Hitler’s Christian Germany: The Twelve Year Christendom https://www.bitchute.com/video/17SjPY3Z5RDo https://www.wikiart.org/en/adolf-hitler/mother-mary-with-the-holy-child-jesus-christ The history of the yellow star Although this public branding of the Jews is associated with Hitler’s Germany, it predated the Holocaust by centuries. In Europe, it first appeared in 1215, when the Fourth Congress of the Lateran introduced an easily distinguishable dress code for all Jews and Muslims. This took the form of a special head covering, such as a pointy hat, or a garb in the form of pieces of fabric attached to clothes. The aim was to force Jews to convert to Christianity, and the dress law persisted in some places until the eighteenth century. Only the age of the Enlightenment and the spread of liberalism led to the fall of the medieval ghettos, and the Jews to receive equality. https://www.abc.net.au/religion/covid-yellow-star-and-history-of-jewish-persecution/13539606 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Pius_VII#Reinstitution_of_Jewish_Ghetto Reinstitution of Jewish Ghetto[edit] Under Napoleonic rule, the Jewish Roman Ghetto had been abolished and Jews were free to live and move where they would. Following the restoration of Papal rule, Pius VII re-instituted the confinement of Jews to the Ghetto, having the doors closed at nighttime.[14] Pius VII issued an encyclical “Diu satis” in order to advocate a return to the values of the Gospel and universalized the feast of Our Lady of Sorrows for 15 September. He condemned Freemasonry and the movement of the Carbonari in the encyclical Ecclesiam a Jesu Christo in 1821. Pius VII asserted that Freemasons must be excommunicated and it linked them with the Carbonari, an anti-clerical revolutionary group in Italy. All members of the Carbonari were also excommunicated. Pius VII was multilingual and had the ability to speak Italian, French, English and Latin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cum_nimis_absurdum
0 likes

PeroErcegovac
3 days ago
This was a set up. And Trump was behind it. The Messiah is born. Cannot believe that after everything we know about him that NS can even believe this man is anything but a Jewish asset.
-1 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
Motion937
3 days ago
And the moon is made of green cheese. Lol
1 like

› Show 1 reply
Sinagoglies
2 days ago
They are no NatSocs, they are Masonic Neo Hollywood NAZIs. The National Socialists did not have any hatred for mankind unlike the J$ws and their shabos goy useful fools. Adolf Hitler’s Christian Germany: The Twelve Year Christendom https://www.bitchute.com/video/17SjPY3Z5RDo https://www.wikiart.org/en/adolf-hitler/mother-mary-with-the-holy-child-jesus-christ DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NATIONAL SOCIALISTS AND NEO NAZIS https://www.bitchute.com/video/P7yJlqTCxvwn/ “I am infinitely informed on the topic and you are saying precisely what the media says. That should give you pause. Let me help you with your homework. Let me give you some quick points 1. Vlad Dracula (Catholic Knight) saved Europe from the Eastern semite invasion. 2. Isabella of Spain (Catholic Queen) saved Europe from the Western semite invasion 3. Adolph (Catholic), Mussolini (Catholic), Franco (Catholic), etc., saved Europe from the enslaved Slavic horde.” http://www.therabbith0le.com/Catholics.html
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
PeroErcegovac
1 day ago
Vlad only converted to Catholicism as a precondition to being released as a prisoner of the Hungarian Crown. He was Orthodox prior to that. Power was his game, not religion. This I say as a Catholic so their is no love here from me toward the Orthodox faith rather just presenting a fact. The Vlachs, the people he ruled over in Wallachia, were themselves Orthodox in faith. Catholics under his rule were Hungarians and Saxons found within his territories. Now having written that I do not see what your comment has to do with mine. In the words of Pauline Hanson I ask, “please explain?”.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Sinagoglies
1 day ago
Anyone can say they’re Catholic online. You can’t even affirm the bleeding obvious. That’s all you can comment on? Pauline Hanson and her Kosher Australian nationalism? Are you kidding?
0 likes
Pahmuk99
4 days ago
Lol. the entire assassination attempt was staged by that fucking orange cunt himself. these retards are jerking off to his fist bumps. ridiculous.
-3 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Joel Davis: We’re live. It is the 28 June 2024. Sorry we didn’t go live last night. Some things came up. But you’ve still got your show, Friday night show. So hopefully that’s good for some of you. Friday night viewing, although a lot of our audience actually watch the replay rather than watching live.

 

So I guess it doesn’t really matter that much.

 

But I think Tom will be joining us as well. He’ll jump on in a bit. But while we’re letting people jump into the chat and we’re getting things going here, I saw. Well, I know from talking to you as well, but also I saw you post some stuff. You’re up on the Gold Coast last weekend. You had a trip up there, and I’m kind of a little bit jealous.

 

I mean, I was up there a few weeks ago myself, but I’m a little bit jealous because it’s actually quite cold down here in Melbourne and weather’s much nicer up there, that’s for sure. It’s also a lot whiter up there by comparison to here, although they’re obviously encountering the same demographic issues. I saw you trained with the Brisbane EAM [European Australian Movement] boys over the weekend, a good bunch of guys. I trained with them a few weeks ago when I was there.

 

But, yeah, just curious how it was, how your trip was? Maybe you could talk about that before we get into some of these other topics.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it was busy. A friend of mine bought a house up there and needed help. He called in a favor, owed him a favor. He needed help with a fence. So it only took like half a day, though. It was only like a small strip of fence. So I didn’t actually spend a lot of time at the property. I got to train with the guys, got to explore the beaches. Surfers Paradise. And I didn’t realize Surfers Paradise was a kind of like a party place, people, because I never went to schoolies. You know, in Australia we have something called “schoolies”.

 

Wherever you finish school, you turned 18, you’re a legal adult, you’re done with your schooling process, your official high school process, and everyone goes to Surfers Paradise or the Gold Coast or maybe even the Sunshine Coast. Where do they go? I think they go to Surfers Paradise. Do they? I don’t know for sure, but I never did that. Right. I was a bad kid. [chuckling] I left school early. I was getting into fights on the streets and just getting into all sorts of things that you would hope that your own kid doesn’t do, right? So I didn’t go to parties. I didn’t go to clubs. I’d never really even attended a birthday party, right?

 

So for the first time, I got to see Surfers Paradise. And, yeah, I enjoyed it. I published a vlog, which was actually pretty fun to make, because I get really bored in transit, sitting on buses, airplanes, waiting for things, and it gave me something to do during that process.

 

But the reason I made the vlog I outlined on Telegram already is for the purposes of utilizing what I suppose we’ll call “lifestyle content”, which can potentially humanize us or contribute to humanizing members of our community. That is the Right-wing Australian nationalist community down here. Because the media, government establishment, it’s really done a number on us. It’s forced this stereotype, imposed this stereotype onto us, that we are vulgar, hateful extremists and probably violent and need to be sent to jail.

 

But in reality, we’re pretty normal people. We have pretty sensible interests. We go to the gym, we have jobs, we bank, unless our bank accounts get closed down for our political views. But then we just go to a different bank, as we discussed last time.

 

But, yeah, the idea is to just do regular stuff, document some of that regular stuff, have a bit of fun, and put that out there. So it will provide a bit of counterbalance to the efforts by the system to have everyone believing that nationalism is some horrible evil. You know, that’s what I had in mind anyway. And what do you think about that, Joel? Have you thought about that on any level?

 

Joel Davis: No, I definitely think it’s important that we show our human side because, yeah, people have to relate to us. I mean, it is cool to have a little bit of that, the mystique of being the kind of controversial, intimidating, scary Nazis or whatever that the media image puts out. Like, I think in some ways that actually gives us a little gravitas, but at the same time, it also makes us alienating to the wider population. That’s part of the reason why we do these streams, not just to kind of provide political analysis, but also just to kind of show that we’re just normal human beings. We’re not exactly normal. We are a little bit abnormal. We’re unique! That’s a good thing, though.

 

But to show that we’re human, to show that you can relate to us and that it’s a relatable worldview, that the perspective that we’re coming at the world from is authentic. And to try and show that authenticity so that people can basically identify with us and identify with our perspective.

 

And that’s ultimately the goal, is for White Australians who don’t hate themselves, who want to assert themselves, actually, to have political representation that they can identify with. That’s the problem with the current culture and politics of our country, is that it doesn’t exist. There isn’t political representation for us, and we’re kind of doing our best to try and lay a foundation for that to come into existence.

 

So it’s important that the people see us in human terms or see us as just one of them coming from the same perspective, the same stock, the same culture. So they can see the world through our eyes, as opposed to just seeing us as these kind of weird, ambiguous kind of what the media calls us “extremists” or whatever, …

 

[06:09]

 

Blair Cottrell: But they do that very deliberately. Like, this is an effort to dehumanize. And your enemies are always going to do that. They’re going to try to dehumanize you in order to justify whatever action they want to take against you.

 

And I think we need to make a bit of an effort to re-humanize ourselves because we’ve been hit pretty hard with that, the guys on the Right-wing.

 

But how’s your week being my friend? You’ve been working, you’ve been busy? You’re always doing podcasts, you’re always appearing here, there and everywhere.

 

So you’re this sort of guy. I was thinking about this earlier today. I was thinking:

 

“Joel’s the sort of guy who just has energy all the time!”

 

You can just do stuff whenever you can work to a schedule, onto the next thing, onto the next thing, onto the next thing. I wish I could do that. I run out of energy. I burn out, and I need, like, two or three days by myself in a dark room to recharge. I, like, have a good amount of excitable energy when I do have energy, but when I’m done, I’m done! But you don’t seem to be like that. You’ve got that consistent energy. Have you noticed that?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I don’t know, it definitely fluctuates, but, I guess yeah, I don’t really understand the whole needing to go into a dark room for two to three days thing that you just described. I’ve never really experienced that before, that kind of need.

 

So I guess we’re not the same in that way. But yeah, I did a few things this week. Like, over the weekend, I did a Twitter space with Uber Boy, who’s a Irish youtuber.

 

And it seems like he’s come around to ethno-nationalism in, I don’t know exactly when he came around what the exact dating was. He always was kind of peripheral to the dissident Right scene online. But he seems to have now gone full., … I don’t know if he’s gone mask off or if he just developed ideologically.

 

But yeah, he defends ethno-nationalism now quite explicitly, which I think is great because he has about 100,000 followers on YouTube. But his YouTube is more about Jungian kind of psychoanalysis and Nietzsche and different philosophers and, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, can you get away with ethnic nationalism on YouTube? Or is that the kind of thing that will get you censored?

 

Joel Davis: Well, that’s the thing. Like, his videos are more about intellectual subjects or what have you. And he markets them quite well to get clicks. And he has some videos that do very well. He has like, 100,000 subscribers.

 

So obviously he’s been doing this for a while. But also on Twitter. He’s on Twitter. He’s quite explicit about his ethno-nationalism.

 

So anyway, we did a Twitter space together. We never had a chat before that was quite good. I thought we talked about the spiritual aspects of race and so on. So that was quite good.

 

And then I want to start doing more Twitter Spaces. Actually, after this show, I’m going to take a little break, maybe like 15 minutes, half an hour, and then I’m going to fire up a Twitter space, actually, with Pox Populi, who is from Europe, but he has an English accent, so presumably he’s English in some way.

 

But I think he lives in Europe. I don’t know exactly his full background. I’ve never spoken to him before either. But I appreciate his posting, and the articles that he writes sometimes at Counter-Currents. You know, he’s definitely a White nationalist. That’s very explicit. Smart guy, you know, good energy on social media. So that should be interesting conversation for us to have after this, if you’re interested. So I’ll be on, as I said, I’ll fire up on Twitter. I’ll post the link on my Telegram. But you can, if you follow me on Twitter, you’ll see it.

 

I want to start doing more Twitter Spaces. I think Twitter, or X, as it’s now called, is a great medium for having some kinds of having conversations and basically reaching the audiences. And you know, obviously, we do things on Rumble. I did a stream a couple days ago on Rumble here with Steve Laws, who’s another White nationalist from the UK. Another great guy doing really well on social media, but also in real life. He actually is running for Parliament in the upcoming elections, but he’s been around for some time and has made a name for himself over there in their scene.

 

So that was an interesting conversation, and I appreciate what he does.

 

So, yeah, I’m trying to do have conversations with people around the world in the scene, from different countries, and I think it’s always good content. It’s always interesting. But, yeah, like, I think Twitter, actually, I’m going to look into if I can start broadcasting this show on Twitter, actually, as well, addition to the other platforms.

 

But I think the Twitter space is a great. Is a great platform. And also you can kind of bring the audience on at the end and, like, let them ask questions or make statements and be interactive. And that could be kind of shit sometimes because some people are retards and they don’t know how to be interesting when they speak. That’s why they’re in the audience, and they should probably stay in the audience. But sometimes people say interesting things and they can provoke a conversation.

 

[11:22]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: So that reminds me, are you keeping an eye on the Superchats? Because I’m not doing that. Are you doing that?

 

Joel Davis: No, I haven’t, but here we go. We got one from Fellow Comrade. He said:

 

“I think Joel has that nighttime dark energy. Blair is a student of the sun.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, maybe I run on emotion. I know I don’t seem like I do, but I’m an emotional creature. I’m an intuitive creature. And I become emotionally exhausted, whereas Joel runs on something else. I don’t know what it is, but it’s not emotion. [chuckling] So obviously, it’s a more consistent energy source that Joel has. I envy it in a way.

 

But the good thing about emotion is, I suppose, when you’re using emotion for energy, it’s kind of like attaching a supercharger onto your engine, the engine that is your body, that is your mind. It just sort of kicks it up that next level sometimes, and you can really create a significant impact in a short time.

 

But what are we going to talk about tonight? Have we got Tom jumping on with us at any point?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, he is. He got held up by a personal matter that he’s dealing with. Yeah, like a kind of tragic circumstance happened to a mutual friend this week and he’s dealing with something to do with that. I don’t want to go into it on stream. But he’ll be on soon.

 

But I was going to say the first story this, well, he didn’t actually commit a terrorist attack, but it seems allegedly that he planned to. He was arrested. There was a manifesto spread around. The media reported on it. Newcastle in New South Wales was the location. Apparently he had a plan to behead a Labor party mp. And this guy in his manifesto stated that he wasn’t a White nationalist, but that he was Right-wing and that he kind of supported the Liberal Party but wasn’t associated with them. It was an interesting kind of story because basically he seemed to say that he was a conservative.

 

So we have a “conservative terrorist”, which is, I don’t think I’ve ever seen that before.

 

So I wanted to talk about that. But that’s something that I think we really want to do when Tom is here because that you can imagine that’s really his wheelhouse.

 

So before we get into that, another major story I guess, from the last few days was the Trump-Biden debate. And I can definitely feel you that Blair did not watch this debate because he doesn’t give a shit about American politics. [chuckling] But I didn’t watch the whole thing. I tuned into the second half of it while I was at work. I just listened to it. And then I saw some of the reaction on social media and I saw some of the clips. I’ll actually play a couple of them.

 

Basically the overall vibe of the debate was that Biden was, we all know that Biden is senile, but the state of him was just horrible in this debate. He looked totally befuddled. And he was just talking with this really like weak voice. Even by his standards, he seems cooked.

 

And the reaction from Leftists said it all. Because I saw all these Leftist influencers on social media freaking out on CNN. CNN hosted the debate. And it was interesting that CNN were fair. They were totally fair in the way that it was where the debate was moderated, which is what you would see in previous iterations of the Trump debates. And then CNN’s analysis afterwards and a lot of these other kind of Left-wing networks. All their analysis was about:

 

“How can we replace Biden with somebody else to go up against Trump? There’s no way he can beat him in this state. He looked horrible out there.”

 

And some people are even speculating that he was set out there to take a fall so they could sub somebody else in his place because he’s been tanking in the polls and Trump is polling ahead of Biden nationally in all the swing states.

 

Anyway, this is interesting to break down not just because of:

 

“Who’s going to win, Trump or Biden?”

 

But there’s more subtle elements, I think, to this story which I have a theory about or, … And I’ve spoken about on the show before, but I want to unpack it. And that actually impacts Australia as well. It’s not just about what’s happening in the United States.

 

And then I’ll throw that to Blair. But before I get into that, I’ll play a couple of these clips for those who haven’t seen him. And, I mean, it’s actually quite funny. Trump is a scam artist, in my view. Like, he’s a master rhetorician and he’s got a great charisma and persona. But he’s just a businessman. He has the logic of a businessman, which means everything is a deal, everything is up for negotiation. There’s no principles there, really. And so I don’t respect him.

 

But anyway, I’ll play the clip.

Biden: We get total bans on, … Total initiative, … We can do more border control and more and [word unclear] them off, …

Moderator: President Trump?

Trump: I really don’t know what he said at the end of that sentence. I don’t think he knows what he said either. Look., …

Joel Davis: Yeah, [chuckling] I said I don’t necessary respect Trump. But the guy is funny! The guy’s got a charisma. He’s got so much charisma that was., … [chuckling]

 

[16:51]

 

Blair Cottrell: That was to take advantage of a weak point in the other person’s sentence, very quickly. He’s listening and he’s looking for a way to just take advantage.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. It’s quite funny. This, this also, I mean, the state of Biden, …

 

Biden: We need to do childcare. Elder care, making sure that we continue to strengthen our healthcare system, making sure that we’re able to make every single solitary person eligible for what I’ve been able to do with the Covid, … Excuse me, with dealing with everything we have to do with, … Look, csif we finally beat Medicare!

Moderator: Thank you, President Biden. President Trump?

Trump: Well, he’s right. He did beat Medicare. He beat it to death and he’s destroying Medicare! Because all of these people are coming in. They’re putting them on Medicare. They’re putting them on, …

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why did he say that? Why did he say “we beat”, did he mean to say:

 

“We beat Covid?”

 

Joel Davis: No. But, yeah, it was a total gaffe. He got muddled up with a few different points and mixed the words together. And the expressions on Trump’s face. He’s got such a hilarious face, the kind of, kind of way he postures and everything. It makes it quite comedic!

 

But overall, my impression of the debate, when I listen to it, Trump did do a good job of, he kept bringing a lot of issues back to the border and to not immigration legally. There’s a lot of controversy. A lot of Right-wingers are attacking Trump last week because he went on a podcast and talked about how America needs to bring more, basically make it easier for international students to stay in America and get work visas.

 

So I made the retort that the Democrat strategy is to import illegal Mexicans and the Republican strategy is to deport the Mexicans and replace them with Indians, because that’s basically you know, the same kinds of demographics of international students we get here, the Asians, the Indians and so on, the same ones they get in America, really. And Trump basically proposed saying:

 

“Well, anyone gets a degree here, they should just get work Visa rights and just be allowed to stay.”

 

And so a lot of people were criticizing him for that, just kind of swapping illegal immigration for legal immigration. You know, it’s still White genocide. It’s still demographic replacement. That’s not what people are voting for Trump for.

 

But anyway, he’s obviously known as being quite strong on the southern border and is committed to deporting the illegal immigrants in a kind of mass deportation scheme and closing up the southern border and so on.

 

So he was playing to his strength a lot, while Biden was just, I mean, the real story of the bit was how horrific Biden was.

 

But when I first turned on the debate, which is about halfway into the debate, they immediately started arguing about who is doing more for blacks. They were talking about immigration. Sorry, they were talking about economic issues. And Trump was saying:

 

“Oh like, the inflation, and the lack of jobs, it’s so bad for black families, it’s so bad for Hispanic families.”

 

Didn’t say White families! It’s all about black families and everything that he’s done for blacks. And:

 

“I did this when I was president for blacks and that for blacks!”

 

And then Biden’s like:

 

“No, I do more for blacks than you!”

 

And it was just like, ugh!

 

Blair Cottrell: Would it be accurate to say that Trump may already have the majority White vote? And so he doesn’t feel it’s necessary to really focus in on the White working class specifically. He’s trying to get the Hispanic and African, African-American vote. Maybe that’s why he’s going into bat for them.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, obviously he’s been doing that the whole time. I mean, he’s been doing that the whole time. He’s trying to play to African-Americans. And in particular, the black vote for some reason, the whole time. Ever since he became president it’s been an obvious strategy. It seems to actually be working with recent polling.

 

But anyway, the point is that playing to them is one thing, but then he doesn’t play to the White voters. He, like, why can’t he say “White families” as well? Is he worried that if you say White families, that’s going to offend the black voters? The black voters, they don’t want him to say black families and White families. They want him to just say black families and not White families or something. And the Whites, you can just take their votes for granted:

 

“They’ll vote for me anyway.”

 

So, you know:

 

“Fuck them!”

 

I really don’t appreciate that attitude. So it’s quite obviously they were arguing over who is doing more for Israel and who defends Israel better than the other person and who takes care of blacks better than the other person. And there was this meme that was spread around, like, satirizing this before the debate. They literally did the meme.

 

So, yeah, overall, the debate was a kind of where it wasn’t comedic. I mean, there was one comedic part, actually where Trump was talking about how great he’s in great shape and how good he is at golf and all this stuff. And then Biden came back saying that:

 

“Oh, no, I had my handicapped down to a six and I’ll take you out to the golf course and I’ll beat you.”

 

And then Trump was kind of quite funny, dismissing Biden, saying:

 

“You know, I’ve seen your swing. It’s not a good swing. We’ve all seen your swing, it’s a terrible swing!”

 

And all this shit! It was actually kind of funny.

 

[22:16]

 

 

But that was like the, almost like the highlight of the debate was them arguing about golf. And it just shows the absolute state of American politics, that’s the level of discourse. But it was kind of quite funny, actually. But overall, the reason why I wanted to talk about this isn’t just analyzing these details as entertaining as some of this stuff was, but more to talk about what are the broader implications? Because Trump was behind Biden in the polls, up until basically October last year. When Israel goes to war with the Palestinians in October last year, then things start to flip. The media starts to flip. All of these legal cases and so on against Trump. They just kind of become de emphasized, and Trump just becomes kind of accepted by larger and larger portion of the American elite as a legitimate candidate again, after they had spent years saying that he should be put in jail, that he tried to overthrow the government in illegal insurrection. And the way that when he was president, it was like priority number one was getting him out of office.

 

The hostility of large portions of the media and American elite in general has really died down. Hundreds of millions of dollars worth of donations have come in from Zionist jews into the Trump campaign. Big, big money has come in in recent months!

 

And in addition, you’ve got the Elon Musk takeover of Twitter. It does seem as though that there’s a mood shift in a portion of the American elite, of, particularly the Zionist element, which is obviously quite a significant element of the American elite. Where, like I said, CNN were very fair in how they conducted this debate, and then they let the story be about how much Biden sucked.

 

They’ve taken the boot off the throat of Donald Trump. Why is this the case? My speculation, my view is that since Israel was attacked and we’re hearing stories now that Israel are planning to invade Lebanon and go to war with Hezbollah, there’s the [word unclear] that they have with Iran that they need America’s help with as well. We’ve got tensions rising in East Asia between China and Taiwan. That issue isn’t going anywhere. And my view is that if China do decide to invade Taiwan, that that means World War Three. The Americans will go to war with China under that circumstance.

 

And I can talk about why I think that’s definitely the case if people want to hear that. But that means we’re at war with China under those circumstances, and it’s World War Three. I don’t think it would necessarily be a ground war, depending on what happens with the Koreas. Maybe if North and South Korea have a ground war, we could end up putting ground troops to defend South Korea from North Korea. But I don’t really see much ground war be more a naval and air battle between US and China.

 

Blair Cottrell: It wouldn’t be ideal for Australia to be directly or by proxy at war with China. There’s a company in Australia that maintains all of our electrical infrastructure, power lines, power stations. This company is responsible for., … It’s the only company that’s actually allowed to repair power lines and, like, service power stations and keep the power in Australia going. The electricity. That company is called Zinfra. It’s Chinese owned. The Chinese own the rights and maintenance processes for all electricity. I don’t know if it’s Zinfra nationwide, but it’s Zinfra in Victoria, the state where we live.

 

I discovered that because a couple of friends of mine were working for Zinfra, and they discovered that China was the majority shareholder for the company.

 

So they’ve bought our electricity, you might say.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, China owns all kinds of stuff. And not to mention they’re a number one trade partner. Various industries are dependent upon trade with China.

 

But the thing is, if we went to war with China, I see the Australian government would basically just seize a lot of these assets.

 

So a lot of companies and infrastructure that is owned by Chinese nationals or corporations would just be seized by the Australian government. Under those circumstances, there’s nothing that China could do to stop it! We would just use the war as a pretext to seize it all. So that is less of a concern.

 

Blair Cottrell: Might be a good thing to go to war with China then, in that case, because we could re nationalize some industry.

 

Joel Davis: I think it would ultimately be a net positive if war with China happens for quite a few reasons. But before I get into those reasons, that’s a controversial take. Obviously, there’s a lot in the pros and cons.

 

But before I get into that, the my overall theory of why Musk has maybe basically been allowed to buy Twitter and there’s been enough support that he’s been able to kind of entrench himself there, after there was a kind of reaction by the elite initially, he first took over. And why the media mood is shifting in the United States, why Trump is being accepted by the American elite largely as a legitimate candidate and treated more fairly, is, I think there’s a prevailing mood that if there’s going to be a war with China, you need patriotic Whites behind the state. And you’re not going to be able to get patriotic Whites behind the state if you have woke Leftism, basically running everything.

 

[28:13]

 

But if you can provide the kind of illusion that we’re winning, that conservative patriotism is coming back, and the border is getting shut down, and we’re going to wind back the excesses of wokeness. This year I’m sure everyone has noticed the Pride celebrations have been far weaker than in previous years. I haven’t really seen much to do with it being promoted that widely. Obviously, there’s still the gay community and it’s doing what it does, but it’s not at the same level of cultural saturation that it was in previous years. The LGBT pride stuff. I see that being wound back.

 

And I see a kind of a move with many elements of the American elite connected to the national security apparatus, like someone like Elon Musk, and connected to the Zionists, again, like Elon Musk, but other elites as well, obviously. That they are concerned about, well, how are we going to manage a war with China? How are we going to protect Israel if we have woke Leftists in charge? That the woke Left elite, like the people who run the Democrat Party or run the Labor Party in Australia, they support Israel because they’re bought off and manipulated by Zionist influence networks. But their entire base of support is anti-Israel.

 

And so they kind of got one hand tied behind their back in how much they can help Israel. And they provide concessions to Palestine and they provide a weaker level of support to Israel than what, if, you know, conservatives are in power, can do. Because their base is better propagandized into supporting zionism. Largely because they perceive the media narrative, does a very good job of presenting the pro-Palestine position as the Leftist position, and so they just take the opposite position.

 

But anyway, the point is that I can see Trump being allowed to win now precisely because of these dynamics. And that has major implications. Why would the American elite allow Trump to stroll into power after spending years trying to get him out of power, trying to obstruct his presidency, trying to put him in jail, trying to prevent him from running again? Why would they do all of that? And now they take the boot off the neck.

 

You know, there’s got to be a reason that doesn’t just happen by accident. I’m not saying they all sit in a room smoking cigars and all the jews get together and they’re like:

 

“What’s our next move?”

 

But it’s just a mood shift. It’s a vibe shift. I think Israel being attacked causes a shift in mood.

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you mean? You’re not suggesting that happens? That probably does happen. And Trump’s probably in there with them! [chuckling] I mean, certainly some hands have been shaken behind some closed doors. Obviously, this kind of shift in social politics doesn’t just happen. Sure, there is some organic nationalism, I think, resurging, resurfacings but I do think that there’s also an agenda laced in there, obviously.

 

I just don’t know. People like us, all we can do is speculate, right? All we can do is speculate and ride the wave and do the best we can to influence people in the direction we want them to think, the way we want them to think.

 

By the way, guys, I’m like, I wasn’t going to say anything, but I’m really under slept. I had a really bad sleep the last two nights in a row, and I feel my memories kind of like, overlapping each other.

 

So I’m going to let Joel, like, really drive this stream tonight. I’m only going to chime in on occasion because, yeah, I’m just really tired. But I’m staying with it and I’m paying attention, so don’t fear.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we’re just, we’re cruising. We’re just hanging out.

 

I got a few Entropy chats my Superchats one from Kay, who said:

 

“Shout out to all the racists in northeast Victoria and Riverina region. Our EAM [European Australian Movement] chapter is in the country’s fastest, is the fastest growing regional chapter in the country. Stop contemplating and step up to join us. We need you!”

 

I guess there’s a call to people who live basically in southern New South Wales or northern Victoria to get involved. They do have a chapter up there which is growing very quickly. Healer Waffen sent $10. He said:

 

“Hello from the USA. The most retarded thing a non-White has said to me was that it’s not possible for two blue eyed people to make a blue eyed baby!”

 

Yeah, well, that obviously is just retarded and wrong. I mean, both my parents have blue eyes, and so do I, so it’s obviously false. [chuckling] But so does, like, every other blue eyed person pretty much that now has two blue eyed parents.

 

Blair Cottrell: Sometimes you even see parents who both have brown eyes have a kid with blue eyes because of some genetic throwback.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course it can happen.

 

And I think it’s like, if one has blue and one has green or brown, it’s like a 50-50, I think. But if two blue eyed parents have kids with each other, I think it’s like 99.9% of the kids have blue eyes or something. It’s like, or 100%. It’s like it almost never happens that you can get a non-blue eyed baby from two blue eyed parents. I believe.

 

Blair Cottrell: I wonder what the esoterics are around blue eyes?

 

I mean, there’s not many blue eyed people left in the world, in the scale of humanity.

 

And I wonder what ties into that. I suppose that’s something I’ll think a little bit about in the next week.

 

[33:37]

 

Joel Davis: Blue eyes enable your fellow man to see exactly where you’re looking. And so blue eyes reveal your will and intention to other human beings in a very explicit way. So blue eyes are an indication of a pure will, a pure intention! The Aryan is of a noble race. We have blue eyes because we have pure intent.

 

And this also, you know, it does count us all for the green eyed people, because it’s quite clear where a green eyed person is looking. And even Hazel eyes. A lot of Europeans have Hazel eyes. Hazel and brown, not the same. If you see someone from, like, India or Africa or something, that you can. They’re the brown eyes are, like, literally, like, so dark, they almost look black, right?

 

Whereas, like, if you see a European with so-called brown eyes, usually they’re Hazel. It’s a very light color. Sometimes it can be almost yellow. And that’s also very rare in the world. And that’s also only Europeans have that eye color, except for you can find some Indo Aryan, Indo-European migrations into the Middle East and so on, and northern Asia in general, and you’ll see lighter eyes pop up in those regions because of that.

 

But other than those exceptions or like a very White Hispanic or something, it’s because of the European genes, only, like, pure White Europeans have those lighter shades of eye color. All the other races, … And the exceptions that I gave are just people who are actually basically, like, majority European ancestry. So it’s still the same thing. Everyone of another race has just dark eyes.

 

Blair Cottrell: You could say the same about skin tone as well, Joel. Like, if, obviously, if you have a lighter skin tone, then it’s easier to see facial expressions.

 

And again, it’s easier to know the intent of the person. Maybe that’s why dogs are racist as well? Because I know that dogs read facial expressions when they’re looking at you. They’re trying to pick up as much information as possible. And dogs, just notoriously don’t like black people. They don’t trust black people unless if they’re raised by black people. I’m sure it’s different.

 

But I’ve had a couple of dogs, and they really didn’t like people with a darker colored skin. Probably just because they had the bias of being raised by a White family, maybe? Or it could be because they can’t read the facial expressions as well, because it is harder to see, especially if the lights failing. It’s harder to see what’s crossing through the eyes and the faces of people of darker complexion or darker eye color. Yeah, that’s a good point. I didn’t think of it that way.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it also shows genetic purity. Like, my blue eyes are an indication of the fact that I have, like millions of ancestors with blue eyes, that have that breed with other blue eyed people over literally like a million years to create me.

 

And so there’s pure breeding that creates me. Whereas someone that has dark eyes, there’s impure breeding to create that because anything can create that.

 

So, yeah, there’s a lot to this. One day, we could probably do like a whole, like 20 minutes., …

 

Blair Cottrell: I think Joel was just cut out. Unless that’s my Internet, that’s the problem. But usually lately, Joel’s Wi-Fi or Internet connection has been a little bit sketchy. So I’m sure he’ll be back in a moment or two. But these topics that we raise, these conversations, they’re always very interesting to me and this is the kind of stuff that I really like to get down into, to explore.

 

But I think Joel’s just re-emerging from the failing Australian Internet connection. Ever since the government took over., …

 

Joel Davis: Give me 10 seconds.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, sure. Ever since the government took over management of Australian Internet with, what do they call it? NBN, National Broadband Network, I think. It just doesn’t work properly. And it’s just so stereotypical, right? The government takes over a formerly private sector and, like, can’t do the job as well or just can’t do it at all! [chuckling] That’s kind of what part of the reason why communism fails, I think because everyone who ends up running the country is some academic who did nothing but learn about life inside the four walls of a classroom. But that’s not going to teach you about agriculture. Like being a, you know, fifth generation farmer in that nation is going to teach you about agriculture.

 

So you’re back on, mate. You’re all good?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. Sorry about that. I just switched to another connection.

 

But, yeah, one day in the future we’ll discuss, we’ll go deeper into the blue eye question, I think. Because, yeah, there’s a lot. There’s not a lot. There’s a small minority of people who are of southern European ancestry who see that me for being Chauvinistic about a kind of like, Celto-Germanic supremacist view that I have. A Nordicism, if you will., …

 

Blair Cottrell: You do have this view? Is that the view you have?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but the thing is that the populations of southern Europe, there are people in those populations that have more racial purity than people who are from, …

 

So you’ll see people, someone that could be from England, and you can just tell by looking at them that they’re less racially pure than someone that could be from Italy, but they look more Nordic, they look more northern European in their orientation.

 

Blair Cottrell: You say you can tell by looking at them. What is it about someone that indicates that they are less racially pure?

 

Joel Davis: What do you mean? You can just see if their traits show that they have some non-European ancestry that has bled in, and then also you have different host populations. So you’ve got the Indo-Aryans. I mean, you’ve got the kind of European farmers and so on.

 

[40:00]

artering. Like, it was kind of more like sharing, to be honest. But everyone had to till the same lands and live amongst one another and marry themselves off and their children off to one another’s sons and daughters. We had a culture that was built around a community that had to trust one another. If you mistreated somebody under those conditions, there was no getting away with it. Were optimized for being honest. Like then in the upper classes at this time, you’ve got medieval chivalry and these like the virtues of like honor, the European conception of kind of like these heroic romances that are like the stories of the Middle Ages and even the Renaissance. No other people have these traits where the European is predisposed to just being real, to being truthful, to our own detriment, it doesn’t matter, whereas these other races are like this, …

 

You look at National Socialism in Germany. To answer your original questions I remember sitting at the table with you when I came around for dinner one night and you were talking about your experiences when you read Mein Kampf. And what made Mein Kampf hit you different, you said, was because you opened it and you read it, and you were like:

 

“Wow! Like, he literally said everything he was gonna do. He published a book. Everyone in Germany read it, and then he did it. Like, that’s like, what politician does that? What politician says, this is exactly what I’m about. This is what I believe, and this is what I’m gonna do. Here’s my book on what I’m gonna do!”

 

[52:34]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: That almost never happens. Right?

 

Joel Davis: Exactly! That is what makes National Socialism different. Jews would never operate like this! Never! Because the jews, a merchant race, is a race that is optimized for scamming. It’s optimized for these limited interactions. And it’s a uprooted, diasporic race.

 

Okay, now they’ve got Israel and zionism, but that’s a very recent thing. For thousands of years, they were just traveling around, and how much can they extract out of an interaction until, basically they get kicked out, or someone gets wise to their shit and they move on to the next victim, and then to the next victim, and then to the next victim! That’s what they’re optimized for. They’re optimized for subversion, for deception and so on. So it’s completely different.

 

So when you say, like, what jews are very, like in-group loyal, and we need to become in-group loyal, and the National Socialism was all about Germans becoming in-group loyal, it’s like, yeah, okay. In that sense, it’s the same. But the methodology is totally different. Like, the way in which we honor our ingroup is not the same as how they operate. It just simply isn’t.

 

But we can learn from them in the sense that they practice in-group loyalty. And we can see the power of their in-group loyalty, but also their power comes from their deception. And that is something that will never really vibe with us. We have to walk the path of authenticity in order to bring Aryans together to take up a struggle, because that’s just how we’re wired.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right! Right. Let me chime in here because we’ve had a Superchat. That’s kind of important. It’s J. Parabellum wants you to check the chat for moderation purposes. I think we get the same people causing a bit of trouble in there. But while you sort that out, …

 

Joel Davis: White Power also said:

 

“Who were some other revolutionaries, politicians, etcetera, besides Hitler, that you guys are enthusiasts of?”

 

That’s a question that you can answer, I think.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, before I do, I was going to say, in regards to learning from jewish in-group preferencing, Hitler actually summarized it perfectly in Mein Kampf, he said:

 

“If there is only one race on the earth, one human race, …”

 

Meaning like one specific sub group, like Italian or German or jewish or something like that:

 

“If only one of those nation tribes is preserving its ethnic identity and none of the others are, then the one that is preserving its identity must eventually rise to become master of the world!”

 

Yeah, so we see there that there’s an effort to subvert ethnic consciousness among non-jewish races. While the jewish race retains its ethnic consciousness. Not just retains, it, protects, it, reinforces it always, you see? And that’s summarized in Mein Kampf by Hitler.

 

But I had something else I wanted to go on to, but because I haven’t slept properly, … The amount of work that goes into those vlogs, the video editing, I can see why people pay to get that done for them.

 

I mean, I would rather do it myself because I want to convey certain messages at certain times. I want to edit it the way I want it edited. But I was doing that for the better part of three days, and that was also shuffling clients around, working. That was a lot of work. I’ve been staring at a screen so long this week, I’m not used to that much screen time. My eyes are burning and, yeah, my memory is failing me a little bit. So the next point I’ll come up with later.

 

But what was the question we got before I started speaking?

 

Joel Davis: Did you have any, other than Hitler, who are some other politicians that you admire also in history? There’s another Superchat on Odysee, by the way. I’m just going to read it out. $14.88 from Goy Boy. He said:

 

“Greetings from the 04:30 am work crew in the USA. Keep up the good work down under, lads.”

 

I appreciate that. But, yeah, so who is another political figure or statesman that you admire other than Hitler?

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you say it? Robespierre? Maximilian Robespierre.

 

Joel Davis: Robespierre, yeah, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Robespierre. French Revolution. Even though he was sort of pro-revolution in the beginning, he changed his tune towards the end because he was, as far as I understand it, he was of the understanding that after the revolution, that the French aristocracy would be made part of the new revolutionary government. They would just have a seat at the table, but other people would be elevated to a relevant position as well, so they would all be on an equal playing field.

 

When he realized that the revolution was actually being used to kill the French aristocracy, he tried to turn on the revolution and was guillotined himself.

 

I read that a while ago, so don’t hold me to that. I don’t know what source that came from exactly, but just that sort of understanding that you’ve been misled, that you supported perhaps the wrong movement. I don’t know. I like that about Robespierre.

 

I also like Napoleon, like the real Napoleon, not the one played by Jacquin Phoenix in that movie that really missed the mark. Napoleon’s got some really base takes. He was a good mathematician. He wasn’t even French either. He was born in Corsica, which I think is an island off the coast of France. Is that right?

 

[58:14]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. So that’s interesting about the former French emperor wasn’t even actually born in France, but close enough. I think maybe Corsica was French territory. I would say maybe not. I don’t know. They had their own army. I know that

 

Joel probably knows a lot more characters than I do, but off the top of my head, I don’t know. I’m a real Australian nationalist. I like my own history more than I do European history. I know a lot about European history because of what I learned about the Second World War as a young scamp.

 

But I was actually recently watching a video on YouTube. There was about someone. He was going through the notes that were written down by Irvin Rommel, who was one of the generals. One of Hitler’s generals, I think, for the German army.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. He led the African theater. He led the Germans in, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And he had some interactions with Australian soldiers.

 

Joel Davis: They fought us, we fought them in North Africa.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah! But he really admired the Australian soldiers. And he made several notes in his diary, which made me feel quite proud to be Australian.

 

Firstly, that Australian men were seemingly larger and stronger than other soldiers of different countries, specifically the Italians. That we didn’t take prisoners. And so the Germans preferred not to fight us. Some of his soldiers actually asked him:

 

“Do we really have to go and fight the Australians? You know, can’t we go onto this other front?”

 

No one wanted to fight the Aussies! They were difficult to beat. And he actually took a photo himself that could have been problematic for him because it was during a charge or some sort of hostility between the Germans and the Australians.

 

And he admired the Australians so much that he actually pulled a camera out and took a photo of some of them fighting so he could take it back. And his son or his great grandson or something, still has that photo to this day.

 

It was a cool video, and it made you realize, or what made me realize that we have a real powerful history in Australia. Like, we’re a respected nation. We were a strong nation, strong policies when we were first in our infancy. Still a young nation, too.

 

So the damage that’s been done to our country, it’s a shame, but I don’t think it’s irreversible. Even hardened Nazi generals acknowledged that Australians were strong, rigorous, formidable enemies!

 

So that’s really something to behold.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I think Napoleon, interesting, undoubtedly Napoleon was an incredible strategist and Machiavellian operator. Politically and militarily. He’s one of the great military strategists period, in human history. But there is considerable evidence that he was funded by jewish elements. The ultimate impact that he had on Europe, I think, was negative. I think he developed, he was an accelerating figure towards the destruction of the old world, European aristocracies and so on.

 

And, yeah, I think he was ultimately destructive in European history. And he didn’t seem to actually really have any ethos fundamentally guiding him. It was just this kind of personal ascension to grandiosity and the deployment of strategy to be a kind of just vehicle of, yeah, just pure, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Your’re saying fundamentally he was always fighting for himself!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And I mean, you could, you could admire that in a certain way. I mean, obviously he’s a great man! Obviously he’s a great man! But at the same time, he wasn’t like he then could be used by other elements because, … It’s similar to the issue with Trump. Trump is nowhere near as great of a man as Napoleon.

 

But it’s similar in the sense that anyone can kind of buy a piece of Trump. Because for Trump, it’s about just kind of getting the job done.

 

Whereas that’s the difference between these figures and Hitler. Hitler was an uncompromising, pure ideologue! A man of heart and vision! It wasn’t about Hitler, it was about Germany, it was about the Aryan race. And that’s what kind of sets him apart from anyone else in modern history.

 

When you look at great figures of ancient history like Alexander the Great, or someone like that you see these similar traits, though, like a Napoleon, where it’s not really about an ethos, it’s about, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Ego.

 

Joel Davis: Just the kind of grandiose personal development.

 

And you know, again, I’m not going to stand in moral condemnation, because that’s just kind of how things are. There’s a lot of people like that in history. And the only crime of an Alexander the Great, or a Napoleon, is that they’re just like exceptional men. So they were able to go further than anyone else.

 

But that’s just, again, that’s just why, to me, like, Hitler stands apart. And it’s very hard to even compare another figure to him, because Hitler seemed to be kind of gripped by this spiritual conviction that was guiding his behavior that was totally transcendent.

 

Carl Jung thought that Wotan, or Odin incarnated in Hitler, that Hitler was just possessed by Wotan from his Germanic blood memory. That he was a pure force of the unconscious. He was the collective German unconscious or Aryan unconscious, as opposed to just being a mere mortal, basically. He was immortal, obviously not in his body, in spirit. You know, that actually kind of makes a lot of sense to me, to be honest. And I don’t think you could say the same about all of these other figures.

 

[1:04:53]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: I think you get corrupted by the world and the people in it. I think we’re all pure in the beginning. And you start to see that subversive activities, dishonesty, lies, that can produce results.

 

And if you become results focused, then everything is just a means to an end. Everything’s a means to an end, and there’s nothing you won’t do to get to that end. You see that that works for other people, specifically in politics. And so you become tainted by those same habits.

 

But earlier on you said that I was remarking how honest Hitler was when he wrote his book in Landsberg prison, 1923, Mein Kampf, which means “My Struggle” or “My Fight”, was one of the first pieces of political philosophy I ever read.

 

But it’s more of an instructional. I don’t even really like to call it philosophy. It’s more of an instructional manual on how to take over Germany of that time and how he was going to do it and why he was going to do it.

 

And one of the parts that really stood out as incredible honesty was how he described propaganda. Basically, what he said in his chapter, War Propaganda, was:

 

“You, the average German citizen, have a small capacity for understanding. You’re not very good at thinking very deeply or very much. So we have to create simplistic, easy to understand slogans for you, and we have to put on a big spectacle to keep your attention and to keep you believing.”

 

“And so that’s what we’re going to do, and it’s going to work. We need to do it because we need to win! This is the way to win!”

 

So basically, he was telling people that they weren’t that clever, and that they needed to be managed in such a way, the material had to be adjusted to their capacity for understanding. And people read that, Germans, because it was the one of the most popular books in Germany at the time, Mein Kampf, I think, second only to the Bible. Germans were reading that and saying:

 

“Yep, okay, sounds right!”

 

You know what I mean?

 

Like, I don’t think any other politician, I don’t think any other revolutionary has actually explained to his own followers what propaganda is, how he’s going to use it, and why they just use propaganda and hope that people won’t actually notice what they’re doing or they can’t be bothered explaining it, or they think it’ll offend people and so they try to hide their intentions.

 

So when I said that, I was impressed by the honesty, or not really impressed, just almost bewildered by the honesty and the fact that that produced results, you know, that’s what I meant specifically.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I think Tom was held up when that call, but he’s going to jump on briefly here because I want to discuss, here he is. Hey, Tom, how you doing, man?

 

I want to segue, actually wanted to talk a little bit about war with China. Maybe I could save that to the end if we have some time building off what I was saying before about, I think ZOG kind of permitting the right to reassert itself a little bit to maybe galvanize patriotic elements behind wars potentially for Israel or against China in the coming years.

 

But before we get into that, I want to talk about this is the biggest story in Australia in recent days, and the media hasn’t talked about it that much? I guess it doesn’t really fit their narrative too well, but it was discussed. This is The Noticer article, as opposed to giving you the mainstream media article.

 

So Liberal Party supporter, because his manifesto, I did skim through it, he did state that he sympathized with the Liberal Party:

 

“19 year old guy from Newcastle in New South Wales charged over alleged failed terrorist attack.”

 

I’ll just read from the article here, quote:

 

“A teenager who allegedly intended to kill a Labor politician.”

 

He said in his manifesto, by the way, he wanted to behead him:

 

“In a failed attempted terrorist attack in Newcastle, allegedly expressed his support for Liberal Party in a manifesto published online. Jordan Patten, 19, appeared by audio visual link in Newcastle Local Court on Thursday morning charged with a single count of other acts done in preparation for or planning for a terrorist attack. Patten, from Raymond Terrace, New South Wales, was arrested at 01:35 pm after allegedly traveling to Labor MP Tim Crakanthorp’s office in tactical gear armed with knives. The court heard Patten was accused of going to the MP’s office, quote, ‘with intent to kill him due to his position as a Member of Parliament and in preparation of planning a terror attack’. He allegedly livestreamed himself entering Mr Cackanthorp’s office before leaving again and walking to the Newcastle museum. Police then alleged that he left the museum and ended the stream before being arrested by officers with tasers nearby., … Noticer News understands that the 205 page manifesto allegedly written by Patten, the author claimed to be Right-wing, but not a White nationalist, or a nationalist. Allegedly stated he was not a member of any groups or political movements, but like the Liberal Party. Police alleged the manifesto expressed extreme hatred for the Labor Party and intentions to kill Labor politicians and alleged that Patten admitted to being the author. The Daily Telegraph has reported. He also allegedly wrote long passages about the Iraq war, the Solomon Islands, war crimes, pedophilia, gender ideology, and on Left and Right politics. Referring to the police facts, acting magistrate Anthony Spence told the court there were strong Overtones of mental health issues.”

 

But yeah, basically, I skimmed over this and my, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Hang on a second! Who is this guy? What’s his name?

 

[1:10:46]

 

Joel Davis: The attempted failed terrorist? Terrorist? What was his name again? It was. I just closed the article. One second. He’s a White Aussie, if that’s what you’re after.

 

Blair Cottrell: Where is he from?

 

Joel Davis: Raymond Terrace, which is New South Wales. Newcastle is like 2 hours north of Sydney.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay. I just recognized that little advertisement on the side there. Australian Sporting Care or something. I think I know the guy who runs that company and I’m thinking, what’s that doing there? It’s not him. That was the expected terrorist, was it? [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: No, no, no! It’s just an ad on The Noticer website.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, right, right. Okay.

 

Joel Davis: But yeah, I skimmed over. I didn’t, obviously, it’s a 205 page manifesto. The guy is pretty unintelligent and a lot of it was quite rambling. So it was pretty tedious.

 

And it had long diatribes about very banal political analysis. Just talking about how, you know, women out of control with the OnlyFans these days. And Sky News is taken over by Zionist. And his Twitter, alleged Twitter account, you can see that he’s following a bunch of these anti-zionist accounts, retweeting them, and he’s following a lot of edgy conservative accounts, but not proper White nationalist accounts. And he had a whole section talking about White nationalists and how White nationalists were all losers apparently we’ve already lost, so we just need to get over it. And he did acknowledge that anti-White racism is permitted, but within that kind of civic nationalist, conservative framework of like:

 

“Oh, so you can be racist against White people, but you can’t be racist against non-Whites.”

 

And then he even said in preparation for his attack that:

 

“Oh, I’m going to be attacking a White person. The media will probably call me racist even though I’m a White person. Attacking a White person. How ridiculous is that?”

 

So this guy literally seems to be like a civic nationalist, like a kind of, I would say someone who would maybe vote for One Nation or something, but with the kind of flipped position on Israel. I guess they’re a younger guy online and younger Right-wingers are more anti-Israel because of how the social media landscape has changed discussion around that issue in Right-wing spaces.

 

But other than that, he’s pretty straight down the line, like, standard conservative on most issues. And that’s not someone that is stereotypically predisposed to engaging in terrorism.

 

Blair Cottrell: No. Definitely not.

 

Joel Davis: So it’s quite interesting. And the media, I think, at first tried to call him a neo-Nazi and then changed because they realized that was inaccurate, wouldn’t stick.

 

And so the story is kind of dissipated. But what I said initially was if he didn’t condemn White nationalism and they could pin White nationalism on him, this would be the number one story in the country. They’d be saying they need to go after us and that we need to be shut down and that we’re responsible in some way. But when he said that he likes the Liberal Party and so on, there’s no:

 

“Liberal Party is encouraging extremism, and conservatism is an extremist, or classical liberalism is an extremist ideology that leads to terrorism and all this stuff!”

 

No one is saying that, obviously. And it would seem absurd! It just shows how absurd their narrative is when it’s directed towards us.

 

That if even some lunatic who purports to have White nationalist sympathies goes and does a terrorist attack, it doesn’t mean. It doesn’t mean anything with respect to what our ideology is in the same respect as anyone committing terrorism above any ideology does, because the act of terrorism is not contained in any of these specific ideologies. It’s a totally independent vector.

 

And also the way that the state has responded to this, it just shows that they don’t care about “extremism leading to terrorism” or anything like that in an authentic way. They just use this as a pretext to go after ideological opposition. It’s not actually about stopping terrorism.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do, you know, anything about this story, Tom? Have you heard about this yet? You’ve been pretty busy this week, so, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I read the story. To me, it just as soon as the story came out, I thought to myself:

 

“Okay, let’s consider the facts.”

 

So I’m not sure if Joel is allowed to put up the photos or if the media has already done it. But there’s photos of his kit. His terrorist kit already.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was going to ask you. Did you see any equipment he had? And how serious was he based on your observation?

 

Thomas Sewell: He had like a eight dollar Craftright hammer. You know, like the worst, cheapest, shittiest brand. Like, you walk into Bunnings and you say, could I have your cheapest, shittiest brand of hammer?

 

Blair Cottrell: The kind of hammer that You’d be laughed off the site. Or like if you actually walked on a job site with a hammer like that.

 

Thomas Sewell: You wouldn’t be allowed on a job site unless you were just like kind of hitting old rusty nails out of like used to 45, 90 planks. Yeah. And then he had like a PVC saw or like a really crappy wood saw. I used one of those to cut PVC when I put it in sumps or do downpipes.

 

[1:16:11]

 

So he was ready to do downpipes. He had his kit ready. He was ready to hammer in some nails and cut some PVC.

 

So this person’s obviously really mentally ill. My other initial thoughts were. And completely unprepared. So there was like a kitchen knife. But again, why would you use a kitchen knife? That’s just ridiculous!

 

And Liberal Party, they’re just not sending their best these days! Liberal Party terrorists are not very good terrorists. They’re very, very poorly organized. The Liberal Party should definitely consider what it’s doing with that!

 

But also, I just want to remind everyone that the Australian Federal Police got caught recently grooming a 13 year old mentally retarded Muslim boy to commit a terror attack. And we’re in the middle of a Senate inquiry at the moment into Right-wing extremism. This guy could be considered broadly Right-wing. He’s definitely not a White nationalist. He’s definitely not National Socialist, and he’s not a member of any of our organizations.

 

And another thing that I’d like to mention, I’m not sure if you’ve already covered on stream, is we all got a direct message on Telegram recently from a journalist from the Australian, Alexi Dematraities [sp]. And I think he’s a Greek male. And he, because Alexi, when I got the message out, I was like:

 

“It must be a woman journalist.”

 

But no, I think it’s a Greek guy. And he messaged us about a day before this terror attack, saying, basically:

 

“Do you agree or do you, ..?”

 

I mean, I’ll just read out the message, unless Joel wants to put it up.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m just thinking, Tom, while you find the message, because he must watch our streams.

Thomas Sewell: He does, he does.

Blair Cottrell: Because he asks questions pertaining to the streams. We’ve triggered him! We’ve triggered him with our anti-medi, anti-Greek rants a couple of weeks ago, and now he’s going after us. Now he’s on our asses, guys! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe. But yeah, I can read it out here. He says:

 

“Hi, Alexi here from the Australian newspaper.”

 

And this was sent June 25th. So that was on Tuesday. I believe this terror attack, or fake terror attack happened on the 26th. So he says:

 

“Doing a story on tomorrow’s edition of on the NSN, EAM rhetoric from certain figures in recent months. Keen to ensure we include any right of response, that you are keen to provide. Some questions below any issues, contact me Alexi Demetradyews.com dot au. Can receive and include any response that come via Telegram. Would need to be back by 05:30 pm on the Tuesday.”

 

So the whole premise of this journalist contacting us was that Wednesday morning they were planning on doing a story in the paper on how we’re a threat to society, how our organization and our community, and specifically here it says, “The Joel and Blair Show” are part of the Senate inquiry. So he says:

 

“Do you stand by any messages or posts you publish on Telegram? Question two, do you stand by any statements or comments aired on The Joel and Blair Show? Question three, do you disagree with submissions to a Senate hearing and experts that the movement and groups remained a “concern and a threat”?”

 

In quotation marks:

 

“Question four, do you stand by your attendance at Hitler birthday party? Question five, anything at all to note across this topic and issue?”

 

And so this was meant to be published on Wednesday.

 

And I actually went down to the service station on Wednesday to get a newspaper. And I found the Australian. And the first, like ten articles in the Australian were more or less about geopolitics, about our relationship with Israel, about our relationship with America, about our pending war with China. That was one of the editorial pieces. About how Senators are crossing the floor to vote in line with Palestinian humanitarianism.

 

Basically:

 

“War is happening in Ukraine, in Israel and Palestine, potentially with China, and we’re not ready.”

 

And that’s what the main sort of ten articles were about:

 

“We’re not unified and we’re not ready.”

 

And it’s interesting that they didn’t publish a piece on these threatening young White men that are Australian, that are pro-Australia alongside. Because that would have been great news, wouldn’t it? If you’re a boomer and you’re opening the paper and you’re like:

 

“Well, hang on a minute. They’re saying we’re not ready for war with China and there’s all this destabilization, the Middle East and Europe, and then here are some young guys training and there’s a Senate inquiry into these young guys going to the gym?”

 

You know, I think that would be almost, … The contradictions would be heightened a bit too much.

 

So I think they put a pause on the article and didn’t release it on Wednesday. But I’m surprised that they haven’t published it as of Thursday because that would have been in line with this fake terror attack.

 

The last thing I’ll say on the subject, other than why would you bring a PVC saw to a terror attack, is he didn’t do a terror attack! But it’s treated as one anyway. Why was counter-terrorism there? How were they there and why didn’t they stop him beforehand?

 

So they let him walk in to the place and then they arrested him when he left without hurting anyone. So they wanted him to do it! Counter terrorism watched a man armed., … Oh, we’ve got the photo up. Excellent! They watched a man armed with a PVC saw, a kitchen knife, …

 

Joel Davis: Look at this knife. You’re not doing crap all with this knife.

 

Thomas Sewell: And a Craftright hammer. Counterterrorism watched him walk into multiple buildings. They watched him walk into an MP’s office and they arrested him after the fact! Doesn’t that tell you something? I’ll leave it at that.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s a weird, that’s a shit looking kit! Like, what are you gonna do with that? You can’t even fix anything with that, there’s there’s no reason, …

 

[1:22:12]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: Someone said online, and I don’t endorse this comment, but someone said online that it’s thewish.comBT, and I won’t expand on that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s the shittest terrorist of all time. But his manifesto sucked, too. And it was like he couldn’t even be fucked finishing it properly. So the first part, he tried a little bit more to have punctuation, and then the second half of the manifesto, like, there’s no punctuation or capital letters. And he kept writing, youse, like, YOUSE, like it’s a word.

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe he was getting angry and he felt like he was just, …

 

Joel Davis: Just like an 85 IQ retard stream of consciousness. Like, it was really. Yeah, it was really weak and, I don’t know what he was expecting to do with this equipment. Also he went in and then left. So he went into the place where he was allegedly going to carry out this attack or plan to.

 

So what happened? Did he just puss out or something? And then he went to the museum. Why did he go to the museum for? In full tactical gear?

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe he had a change of heart and wanted to eradicate some White history? But maybe, you know how can you commit to a, like, something like a terrorist act when you’re a conservative? I mean, you got half a foot in one way and half a foot out the other.

 

But it’s just, it seems very strange, man. This is all very strange. It’s weird! I don’t know if it’s a psyop. People in the comments are saying it’s a psyop. Could be. This guy could have been helped into the position he got himself into?

 

Thomas Sewell: Counter-terrorism was there watching him walk into an MP’s office. And the fact that the Australian Federal police recently got caught grooming a retarded Muslim, which is kind of a tautology. But anyway.

 

To me, it’s obvious that this guy was in the wrong Telegram chats where federal agents sit there grooming autistic retards. And they don’t groom them for active clubs:

 

“No, no, no! Don’t try and train. Don’t do anything productive with your life. No, don’t get in the garden or get a trade or get a job or do activism or larp. Don’t do that. No, no, no! Just operate in small teams of two to three men, buy all this equipment!”

 

And that’s what these people in these group chats are saying:

 

“Don’t get involved! No, no! It’ll put you on the radar. But if you just operate solo, then counter-terrorism won’t be waiting for you!”

 

And yet it’s in fact the exact opposite.

 

Joel Davis: It was actually admitted by, … Which official was it? Whether it was Mike Burgess himself, or some other official from the intelligence community. But they said:

 

“What they’re afraid of with so-called Right-wing extremist terrorism. The threat is not actually that anyone from our organization will do anything, but that a lone wolf who will get frustrated at our lack of progress will go and do something stupid. They’ll get so demoralized and they’ll become isolated and that they will do something independently of us.”

 

So what he’s tacitly admitting is that the people in our organization, we actually maintain discipline to prevent them from doing a terrorist attack.

 

So he’s saying the actual opposite, that we are not a terrorist threat, but the opposite that we lower the terrorist threat by our existence. That was a funny thing that I remember we talked about on the show when those remarks were made.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, we don’t gain anything from terrorism. We don’t gain from people doing terrorism, we lose. Yeah, we want serious political change. And just little one off farts in the wind aren’t going to make that change. We want to build a large political organization that has many multifaceted working parts. Thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of members, families, businesses, resources, land, you know, training, culture, everything!

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a lifestyle. It’s a multi generational lifestyle.

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: Like we’re controversial now, but eventually we promote, live and promote a certain lifestyle until that lifestyle becomes the norm for the nation. Right? And that is a multi generational process, right? That’s what you’re saying.

 

Thomas Sewell: Absolutely!

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve got a feeling that that journalist might not publish that article he was originally going to write. It might just be a bit too spicy because he sent me the same message that you read out just before.

 

But what he asked me about specifically is he said:

 

“Do you stand by comments you made on The Joel and Blair Show stating that the Holocaust was fake and didn’t seem mathematically possible?”

 

And in response to that, I just doubled down. I said:

 

“Yeah, well, yeah, of course I stand by that.”

 

I said:

 

“The logistics are impossible. And the evidence just isn’t there! So I think it’s war propaganda, meaning it’s either wildly exaggerated or completely made up, because the logistics are impossible. And there’s no evidence.”

 

That was my response. If they print that in a newspaper, man, that’s pretty spicy, and he might get in some trouble there. [chuckling] I reckon that went to the editor, and editor’s like:

 

“You can’t publish that!”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, a lot of people read that and:

 

“Oh, that’s a good point!”

 

But moreover, it’s ridiculous you can’t have an opinion on a historical event. Like, let’s say, I think you’re correct, but let’s say you’re wrong. So what? Why can’t you have a historical opinion? I mean they made a historical opinion, a question of morality, that it’s, like, immoral to speculate upon a historical event, whether it happened or not. That’s not immoral! It’s just a it’s a factual question. How can it be a moral question? It’s a factual question! I don’t think the moral question is totally separate from that.

 

Blair Cottrell: No one actually believes it’s immoral. There’s certain people that are just worried about the facts that may be uncovered if people do ask too many questions about that particular event in history.

 

 

[1:28:06]

 

 

Joel Davis: But I want to touch on the notion of war with China, because I kind of set that up earlier. And Tom also set up the issue with his statement, talking about how:

 

“Oh, well, he opened up the paper expecting to see an article about our show because this journalist from the Australian was asking us questions.”

 

And then instead of getting an article, he gets ten articles about potential war with China and our lack of preparedness for war with China.

 

And I was saying earlier, I think that the boot has been taken off the neck of Trump, not just for the sake of defending Israel, but also for the sake of preparing patriotic elements in the West to be readying patriotic elements to fight China. Bringing them back on side. Wokeness has to be wound back in order to bring them back to the table.

 

And I think a lot of people say:

 

“Oh, we won’t fight China!”

 

Well, the thing is that it’s actually not up to us, it’s up to China.

 

So there’s a current status quo in the region, and that status quo is only going to be disturbed by China invading Taiwan. So if China make the decision to invade Taiwan, that’s the trigger. It’s nothing that the American government does, the Australian government does. We’re already committed to defending Taiwan, allying with America to defend Taiwan. They’re committed to defending Taiwan. They have to be committed to defending Taiwan, because it’s the basic commitment that holds together all their other alliances in the region. Their alliance with Japan, their alliance with the Philippines, their alliance with South Korea, and so on.

 

It’s all dependent upon the idea that the Americans would be willing to go to war to prevent Chinese expansion.

 

So America is fully committed. China is the rising potential superpower. The American logic is, if we don’t fight them over Taiwan, we’re going to have to end up fighting them somewhere else in a less mutually, a less relatively advantageous position. So they’d rather fight them over Taiwan than fight them later over Japan or over somewhere in South America, potentially, if China was to take over Asia.

 

So they would rather have the fight in China’s backyard, and the fight would largely be a naval and air battle. It would basically be the US Navy and their allied navies, including our navy, trying to navally blockade China. To shut down all of China’s trade with the rest of the world through blockading all the trade routes, the ocean trade routes, which are vital to China’s economy, would induce a famine.

 

But moreover, they’re just going to just blow up as much shit in China as they possibly can.

 

Meanwhile, the Chinese will try and blow up all of America’s navy and air force. Japan will probably get bombed. A second Korean war could break out, potentially, which could mean ground forces.

 

So that’s something to be concerned about. If you’re a younger man, you could get drafted to fight in Korea war two while this is happening.

 

But other than that, I wouldn’t anticipate too much of a ground battle. I think it would be mostly an air and naval battle, and the American logic as:

 

“Yes, we could get our entire navy and air force blown up, but China would get its entire economy just utterly destroyed!”

 

A mass famine. Tens of millions of people would starve to death. Their economy, 50% of it, would just fall away overnight. It would get shunted back decades. And America would take a hit, but they’d take a 10% hit and China would take a 60% hit, and they would say:

 

“Well, overall, that works out net positive for us, because they’re the only country in the world that’s even close to competing with us.”

 

I think that also contextualizes why Trump is saying that he wants to negotiate peace with the Russians, because I think the Americans want to finish the Ukraine issue and get it sorted and completed before anything breaks out with China so that they can try and neutralize Russia and try and make Russia more of a neutral party rather than be trying to fight two fronts at the same time.

 

So I think that explains, like, Trump’s statements and foreign policy and why there’s probably a large element of the American elite that is behind him.

 

But also it might also explain why things might start to shift in the way that the media is reporting on things in coming years. You might start to notice “wokeness”, quote, unquote, getting attacked more. You might notice a kind of a Right-wing vibe shift start to set in. And we’ll see if it plays out as I’m describing. But I’m already starting to see the signs that it is already starting to play out. And I think, and that isn’t necessarily because of some grandiose conspiracy, but just like, a general mood shift in the elite as they’re coming to terms with the reality that they need to have more patriotic Right-wing sentiment in order to confront the challenges that they have globally.

 

So do you guys, particularly Tom, you just come on! Do you agree with that assessment or what do you think?

 

[1:33:03]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I’ve unfortunately got a head off for reasons that you guys understand, but the audience doesn’t need to know.

 

But, yeah, I do agree with the sentiment. And, yeah, it’s why we’re seeing White men in military recruitment ads. Like, it’s obvious that war is inevitable with China. And it will happen between now and, 2030. Yeah, they will probably wrap up the Ukraine, Russia thing as soon as Trump is elected. But that doesn’t mean anything. The world is completely destabilizing, and it’s destabilizing it at record speed.

 

And I think, as we discussed last night, Joel, we should just work towards getting India and Pakistan to nuke each other. That should be our geopolitical strategy.

 

And then we can have total pajeet annihilation and go back to just living in the land of milk and honey without being annoyed!

 

But anyway, unfortunately, I have to head off. I’d love to have a chat about deep geopolitical subjects. And it was a very important day today with the senile debate with Trump and Biden.

 

But, yeah, I’ve done enough talking. I’ll see you guys later.

 

Blair Cottrell: Take care, mate.

 

Thomas Sewell: Thanks.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we had, yeah. Sorry about Tom having a go. The community had a tragic circumstance. We’re all okay, but tragic circumstance. And Tom is the leader of the community. Yeah, it falls on his shoulders when things like that happen.

 

But anyway, yeah, the I think Tom basically agrees with my assessment.

 

Do you feel a little bit of that shift, Blair, because you kind of have your finger on the pulse of the energy. Do you feel the vibe shift? I think Australia is lagging a little bit behind where it is in America. I think America is a bit ahead of the curve because that’s the center of the empire, the center of power, and it takes a little bit of time for the cultural shift in America to fully kind of like download into the Australian elite and then disseminate down to our population.

 

But how do you see it?

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s definitely a shift taking place, and it seems like that’s fundamental patriotism that, as you explained, is necessary to deal with the problems that we face these days. Even if it’s just to get people to join police and defense force. I think it’s coming back. I think there’s going to be more of a shift towards that. And I feel that the people are ready to accept that.

 

The people are kind of almost yearning for that, especially down here in Australia. There is no longer a strong amongst ordinary working class people, there’s not a strong sense of national identity in Australia anymore, at least not down here in Melbourne. I can say that there’s still some, you know, remnants of that old, vigorous Australian patriotism up in Queensland. I witnessed it myself when I was up there on the weekend.

 

But it’s very tied into the north and the beaches. I think there’s something to do with the Australian beaches that that old Australian patriotism, that Aussie pride, it pertains to the beaches and beach culture for some reason. And maybe that’s why down here in Melbourne, it was easier to, how should I describe, expurgate national pride from the working people. Because we don’t really have a strong beach culture down here in Melbourne. The beach culture in New South Wales and Queensland is a lot stronger.

 

But in essence, what I’m saying is I do feel that there is a shift about to take place. To me, it feels like we’re in the preliminary period before a major social shift where the way things were, they’re not going to be that way anymore. We’re not going to have that radical Left, just free reign in the institutions, banning who they want, saying what they want and getting away with it.

 

There’s going to be a little bit more nuance. There’s going to be a little bit more of a resurgence of the nationalistic spirit and a bit more representation. It might not be legitimate representation at first. There’s going to be people who are working for other people. There’s going to be people with specific interests, personal interests, even if it’s just their own egos. Obviously, that’s just what we deal with on a daily basis in politics. But what I can say is there is a feeling that something’s about to change and it’s going to change around the world. I think.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think there’s a lot of interesting little signs that I’m seeing. One is there was polling that has been done on, in America on attitudes to gay marriage.

 

And over the last few years, gay marriage has been turning around the other way. So you have, like, from the beginning of the polling to a few years ago, gay marriage gets more and more popular every year. So in the nineties, like, only, like a third of Americans support a gay marriage. And by 2019, two thirds of Americans support gay marriage.

 

And now it’s only going back by a few percentage points, but it’s going back the other direction the last couple of years. And, yeah, I think that there’s a sense that liberalism and this constant progressive agenda of making, of kind of expanding the scope of acceptance and new victim categories and so on, there’s a collective exhaustion. I think it basically ran up to a kind of limit, and now it’s kind of bouncing back the other direction.

 

And I think that that’s a prevailing sense. There’s a certain organic element to that.

 

But then, in addition, you have these geopolitical realities, which are what they are. Like, the reality of China is what it is. It can’t be avoided. Jews run America more or less, and they have their designs, and they would like America to be as unpatriotic as possible because they’re kind of afraid of a White American patriotic sentiment as turning against them potentially and usurping their power.

 

[1:39:34]

 

But at the same time, in order for them to run the world, they need America to run the world. So they need, and for America to keep running the world, you need a certain amount of American patriotism. So they have to balance these two forces. They can’t go all in on just hard Leftism in order to keep the show on the road.

 

And, like someone like Elon Musk or whatever, he’s obviously not our guy, but I think he’s realized, well, if we want to have America leading the world and all this technological development and a space program and all of this stuff, well, we can’t have, like, black women, diversity hires running everything because then every system will break down. We need to have White men running shit again. We have to get rid of wokeness if we want the American system to be functional again and achieve some of his ambitions, technological ambitions or whatever.

 

I think he’s like a Reddit bug man that assesses the world in terms of technological development rather than anything more spiritually meaningful. And I don’t like that.

 

But nevertheless, I think it’s a realistic viewpoint to come to.

 

And I think the same thing for the jews that care about zionism. They’ve realized:

 

“Well, the entire project of Israel is kind of dependent upon American power projection. If we completely destroy America with diversity and inclusion and wokeness or whatever, taken to its ultimate limit because we want to prevent White Americans from reasserting themselves, well, then we’re going to end up, the parasite will destroy the host. And if America goes, we go. They’re the only thing protecting us from the Muslims!”

 

So I think a lot of these realizations have started to set in and different elements of the elite. And if they soften their attitude towards patriotism and towards the Right, it just organically re-emerges because it’s the organic state of things. It’s only held back by elite repression.

 

All they have to do is just kind of soften the repression and it just comes back. They don’t even have to actively bring it back.

 

But in some cases they probably will actively bring back kind of like pseudo nationalist controlled opposition movements that are to the right of what currently exists.

 

And we’re going to start seeing them pop up more and more.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s why they say “no rest for the wicked”, right? If what you believe is fundamentally flawed or wrong, and you still want that belief system or that ideology to be powerful or to be the central power of a certain region, state, country, and you’ve got to put in a lot of effort, a lot of property propaganda, a lot of subversive activities, a lot of oppression, suppression of what the truth actually is so no rest for the wicked!

 

In summary, what we’re saying there, I suppose, is its not going to be cool to be a feminist anymore. It’s not going to be cool to be anti-racist anymore.

 

Actually, it was never cool to be either of those things.

 

What I mean is you will probably find the feminists and the anti-racists are just getting less support, less institutional support in the future to what they’re accustomed to up until now.

 

So that’s going to be good to see. It’s going to be exciting to see the shift. But it was always going, it was always bound to happen.

 

As you said, it’s gotten to the point where it’s just ridiculous now.

 

It’s gotten to the point where children are being targeted with homosexual and transsexual messaging. And why? Why? What’s the point, at the end of the day?

 

I don’t want to get into that because. Yeah, I’m exhausted by you talked about exhaustion. I’m exhausted by that, even thinking about that shit! I don’t want to think about children being exposed to transsexuals, reading to them in a library. I don’t want to think about that. It just irritates the living shit out of me, that that’s even happening! Why do I need to think about that? Why is anyone even doing that!

 

And I suppose the average Australian feels the same way. It’s something you just don’t want to have to think about. You’re just so over it! You’re so ready for that to be gone! So it can’t be gone fast enough.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! Like, it’s only propped up by a small subclass of perverts that are themselves reinforced by institutional power. And if that institutional power is taken away, then it immediately becomes marginalized. It’s on a very flimsy foundation. And that foundation for a lot of these, like, excessive woke thing, I don’t see them going to, like, race. They’re not going to embrace, like, White nationalism. They’re going to push-pull back to a civic nationalist, centrist position where they’re going to start winding back the excessive Leftism.

 

Blair Cottrell: Still appealing to everyone. You’re still Australian if you’re from Pakistan or whatever, but we’re just going a little bit more conservative. Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. That’s what I see materializing with the establishment. And for the people watching in the national security establishment, ASIO agents that watch our show, you should really take the boot off our neck. Let us go back onto YouTube. Let us grow. Let us go back on, I’m on Twitter, but let Tom and Blair back onto Twitter. Stop trying to censor us. Stop trying to take us out. Let us cook!

 

Because if you want to be able to go to war with the yellow menace, you’re going to need some racism. So let us go and spread some racism. For once, we actually have something that we both want to achieve! We want to make the country more racist! You actually want to make the country more racist!

 

[1:45:06]

 

Blair Cottrell: You want to be careful man! You want to be careful making deals with people like that.

 

Joel Davis: I’m not making a deal! I’m just saying, just leave this, let us cook. Leave us alone. Leave us alone. Let us cook.

 

Blair Cottrell: All I can say to those people watching this, like the agents watching this, I hope you’re being paid enough because these are long streams. And you’re probably not even interested in this stuff, but you got to sit there and listen to all this shit and write down all the major points and then review it all and take it to the next guy. It’s like, just seems like a lot of work.

 

So I hope you’re being paid well. I wouldn’t want to do it.

 

Joel Davis: A couple Superchats, one from Bishop 1599 says:

 

“Where do you base your morals and spiritual backbone in this political group you propose?”

 

I mean, this is a very vague question.

 

Blair Cottrell: Blue eyes! That’s where we base it. The blue of the eyes. [chuckling] If you have blue eyes, you’re in!

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, it’s, we’ve covered that more, these more general subjects on other streams, and we’ll cover them more in the future. I don’t really want to go down that path because there’s another subject I wanted to bring up, and then we’re going to bring the close of the show. But thanks for your Superchat.

 

But, yeah, basically, in a nutshell, my core values are loyalty, authenticity, honor, and I combine these things together.

 

So to me, I’m loyal to my people, I’m loyal to my friends, my family, my race, my nation. I believe in honoring my ancestors, honoring my blood, and I believe in authenticity.

 

So I believe in living my life for that which I love the most, which is my people, which is my future children, grandchildren and so on, and living my life in service to these things.

 

And that’s what I derive, ultimately my values from in a nutshell.

 

And I also, I believe God made me this way and put me in this position. I’m just trying to honor what has been given to me by God, like what my destiny is or my, who I am, where I come from and where I’m obviously going, what I’ve been made, what I’ve been born to do.

 

Chattington said:

 

“Had a politics slash race argument with my girlfriend’s boomer family. I calmly counted their open borders retarded stance, which enraged the father into trying to attack me. I stayed composed, but now I’m questioning the relationship. It’s made me focus on the girlfriend, and now we’re both negative with each other. Thoughts?”

 

Well, yeah, I mean, …

 

Blair Cottrell: What was the problem there? He raised something at a family.

 

Joel Davis: He got into an argument with his girlfriend’s. Yeah, he got into argument with his girlfriend’s parents about immigration or something. He said he stayed calm, that they got triggered, and now his girlfriend and him are having issues as a result because I guess she sided with her family against him. Yeah.

 

I mean, I don’t really got a lot of context there for me to give you relationship advice.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve been there! I’ve been there. I had a girlfriend when I was younger, and she used to take me, … When she first met me I was athletic. I was fitter than I am now. And she thought to herself:

 

“Wow, I’ve got this big blonde boyfriend. I’m gonna go show him off to my family!”

 

Little did she know, I’d been reading Mein Kampf for two years straight! And I’d, like, highlighted and rephrased, like, wrote down all the best paragraphs. I was fully propagandized by National Socialism! And it’s all I wanted to talk about! I was about 22.

 

And so, you know, this poor girl [chuckling] and her family, man, at the at the first dinner she took me to. Yeah, it didn’t go well! All I talked about was Hitler. [chuckling]

 

So in that situation, I would just brush it off. Like, it’s not even that serious. Don’t worry about it.

 

“If you want to stay with me, you can. No worries. But if you don’t, see you later!”

 

I suppose that’s how I’d go about that. Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I think at the end of the day, like, your girl has to respect you if she doesn’t respect you, like, even if she doesn’t 100%, like, fully agree with your opinions, she doesn’t respect that you have a right to have your own opinion and assert your position in a fair reasonable way, then she doesn’t respect you as a person, which means she doesn’t love you, which means you shouldn’t be with her.

 

You just explain that to her like, you’re being disrespectful. Explain why she’s being disrespectful. And if she can’t see it and apologize, then how can you build a life with someone like that? You can’t marry and have children with a woman that doesn’t respect you.

 

[1:50:09]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: So, yeah, that is true too. Men can tolerate anything except disrespect. That’s the one thing men can’t tolerate. It just wears you down, breaks you down, and eventually, you know, drives you to extremes if you’re not being shown respect. If you’re not being shown respect in any, I think I said this on the off grid on the Ireland podcast I did a few days ago. In any situation, in a working relationship, personal relationship, just leave. It’s not worth it. It’ll crush your, it’ll shrink your testicles! If you tolerate disrespect, your balls will get smaller and your testosterone will plummet! It’s just mathematical certainty. Do not tolerate disrespect. Just leave! You don’t need to stay in a situation where you’re being shown no respect.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it doesn’t make any sense. It’s like if a woman feels in a relationship that her boyfriend doesn’t love her, then she should leave. It’s like love to a woman is like respect to a man. It’s like the essential foundation of everything.

 

Blair Cottrell: That is so true. And any woman who doesn’t understand that, doesn’t understand men or love.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I saw some faggot was complaining that we didn’t talk about Julian Assange being cutting some deal that was in the news to be released. Well, I just don’t find it to be that significant, frankly. Julian Assange is a Leftist, okay? He’s an anti-war Leftist and leaked some interesting anti-war, or he leaked some interesting diplomatic cables and facts about the war in Iraq and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that made for interesting journalism and exposed the zionism and the war crimes of the United States.

 

But then also, he did other things. He doxxed BNP members, the White nationalist party in Britain. So he’s not our political ally at all! Yeah, he dropped some interesting stuff that maybe Trump wouldn’t have got elected if Julian Assange didn’t drop that dossier on Clinton. There were some interesting things in those emails. There’s interesting things that he’s dropped over the years. And the way that the American State treated Assange was kind of interesting. Like, it showed the kind of global reach of their power that they could try and go after an Australian citizen operating in a foreign country for why would they have the right to do that under American law? Why are other States complicit in that? It does show that the extent of American global power, the lack of respect for the national sovereignty of other nations.

 

But at the same time, what has he done for White people? Fuck all! So who cares? And he’s not loyal to us. He’s a Leftist. He’s stuck in that old, like, 2000s anti-government Leftist paradigm of, like:

 

“Oh the wealthy elites and American imperialism and the corporations, man!”

 

Like this is a totally outdated form of politics that isn’t really relevant to anything.

 

Blair Cottrell: Now I’m starting to really rely on you to understand what I should be paying attention to and what I shouldn’t be. Because you got a pretty good gauge of where our energies should go as well, I’ve noticed. And, yeah, because I agree. I had the same feeling about Assange, but I hadn’t really put it into thoughts or words yet. But, yeah, you’ve just spoken the words that I was feeling.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! I think we don’t have to support people just because they present themselves as, like, anti-regime in one way or another. Because it’s like how you oppose the regime that’s important. It’s not just that you oppose it.

 

Like it’s the same reason why I’m not shedding any tears for Left-wing, pro-Palestine protesters or the Palestinians in general. Because yeah, they’re going up against the jews, and I don’t like the jews. But they’re going up against the jews for reasons which aren’t aligned to my reasons for going against the jews. So, like, they’re not my allies. They’re just that kind of enemy of my enemy. They’re not my friend. There’s that phrase, “an enemy of my enemy is my friend”. I don’t actually agree with this logic. There’s many instances where this is not the case.

 

There’s many instances where two people can be fighting. Neither of them are your friends, but that’s just obvious. I’m not gonna side with the jews against them, but I’m not gonna team up with them against the jews either. I’m just gonna stand back and, like, let them fight and not give a shit and focus on what I’m doing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, right. I think it pertains to people start to waver if they feel like they have more than one enemy. If people start feeling like they have lots of enemies, then the task that they’re trying to achieve seems insurmountable, and they begin to waver. They begin to lose faith.

 

So I think that saying kind of comes from that just psychological reality. It’s always best to keep it simple and to make it seem like we’re only fighting one enemy, ultimately. But I do agree that enemy of my enemy as my friend certainly isn’t always applicable.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, it isn’t.

 

Now, I wanted to talk about this in pertaining what we saw this the Strauss Howe Generational Theory. I’m just pulling up the Wikipedia article so that maybe some people will go and take a look at this. Because it’s based on, I mean, they wrote multiple books, but they wrote one book called The Fourth Turning, which I’ve flicked through before. And I listened to podcasts, one of the authors, explaining his theory.

 

And basically, it’s like a theory of the cycles that occur in history, like generational cycles that occur in history, particularly in American or Anglo-American history. And he’s basically a full cycle, they say, takes about 85 years. It’s like a full human life cycle, roughly. And it’s broken into four constitutive generational turnings, each generation about 21 years.

 

[1:56:36]

 

And then they describe how each generation has its own kind of archetypal Persona and corresponding mood. And its Persona is derived from the mood that is created by previous generations while they’re growing up. And that because the world that you grow up in is basically created by the kind of inclinations and personality of the previous generations that come behind you, that set the tone for that world, that then sets the tone for what your generation will become, and then sets the tone for the kind of world you will create for the generation ahead of you as you move through your life cycle.

 

And so that’s why it’s this cyclical model, because each generation creates the conditions to reciprocally generate one another through this process.

 

Anyway, basically, they also invented the word “Millennial”. When people say millennials, these are the guys who actually invented that term.

 

Now, the reason why this is interesting is because they say that every 85 years, America goes through some fundamental crisis that is precipitated by this cycle, and that kind of launches the next cycle.

 

And so you have the Revolutionary War. Thats the beginning of the United States. Then 85 years later, you have the Civil War. Then 85 years later, you have the World War Two. And then 85 years later, basically its the next four or five years.

 

So America is due for another massive war, basically that’ll reset the cycle, according to this theory. Which plays into this idea that maybe World War Three or with China, is a very serious possibility in coming years.

 

Moreover, it contextualizes the kind of relationship between, like, Boomers, Gen-X, millennials, and according to their theory, like, Zoomers don’t really exist. Zoomers. Like older Zoomers, are part of how they categorize millennials.

 

And then the younger Zoomers and generation Alpha, as they call it, like the generation, basically the people who are kids now, they’re a separate generation, so they don’t divide the generations up exactly the same way that common parlance does, where we’ve got, like, Millennials and Zoomers, and they’re distinct from one another. But they have a rationalization for why they put that together.

 

And I’m not going to go into that right now.

 

But the point is that they say that there are these kind of four fundamental, archetypal Personas of each generation. And Millennials have the same Persona as what they called the GI generation, the generation that fought in World War Two. And that basically our generation, the Millennial generation, and that includes older Zoomers.

 

So if you are not in high school anymore, you’re a Millennial. According to this theory, that basically we grow up in a time of crisis. And that crisis was precipitated by the individualism of Generation X and the Boomers who grew up in a time, time of expansion. That was a time of peace and development and optimism that was generated by the successful outcome of the previous crisis, which was World War Two. So we win World War Two, and then there’s prosperity, and there’s like mass urbanization and the extension of childhood and universal education extending into university, and all these economic opportunities. And this creates the individualism of the Boomers and Gen-X.

 

And then the world that they create is this kind of hyper individualist world of the eighties, the nineties, the two thousands. And that world then precipitates the crisis, which is global financial crisis, the mass immigration, the kind of breakdown of Anglo-American global dominance in geopolitics. And we’ve inherited this crisis.

 

And the Millennial generation is basically, we’re kind of a generation that’s designed to become the champions of some great cause. And what he talks about in the GI generation, as they call it, which is the generation that fought World War Two. Prior to World War Two, that generation was super Left-wing. They were really, pre-communism was getting really popular. Far Left-wing politics was getting really popular. Then World War Two happens, and that generation becomes super Right-wing and patriotic, because they actually had to fight the war.

 

Blair Cottrell: Does that GI generation end up getting killed off, though? Because they’re the ones to fight in the wars and they don’t like, …

 

Joel Davis: Well, a portion it will get killed off, but the ones that the majority of it obviously will survive.

 

But then that generation, then as it matures, because it goes through that experience, it then sets up the new world and it kind of returns to, … Millennials, he says, there’s usually two individualist and then two collectivist generations.

 

So the Boomers and the Gen-X are individualist generations because they were raised within a collectivist world.

 

So you have the generations that fight and win World War Two, and then after World War Two, you have a far more kind of collectivist society. For example, in America, where you have university education paid for with the GI Bill, and you have massive taxation upon the rich, and everyone comes together, and it’s all about America has to fight the Soviets. And there’s all these wars, like with Korea and Vietnam, and there’s the space program, and it’s this kind of like, intense patriotism that forms in the country.

 

And then the Boomers are born in that world and they rebel against it, and they have, like, they become hippies and yuppies and Cultural Revolutionaries and embrace the destruction of Christianity and the old family structure and anti-racism and all of these. And they prophesize what the ultimate crisis will be in their rebellion against the previous order.

 

That then has obviously played itself out. And then the Millennial generation, as we’re now kind of like, rising up into contesting for power, the Boomers are dying off. And then we confront the next crisis. Then that crisis then sets the tone for the next phase.

 

So anyway, basically, this Generational theory would predict a major global crisis, and then a kind of conservative collectivism.

 

And basically the overall themes that we’re putting forward here, this idea that wokeness has to be wound back and the regime has to get serious and do away with championing a lot of these luxury beliefs. People call them, like, being like the pro-gay, transgender thing.

 

[2:03:31]

 

Blair Cottrell: Human equality.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! These things are all luxury beliefs. And the crisis just destroys the luxury under which those beliefs can be created. They were created by Boomers in a phase of luxury, and now they’re going to have to be, like, reversed and sacrificed. But the millennial generation won’t fundamentally overthrow the old order. They will be like a conservative reaction against its excesses.

 

And then the generations that that then emerge after us, like after the crisis, they will then rebel against the values of the old order. So according to this theory the time for there to be a rebellion, like a kind of hard upswing in like White nationalism or something, and more traditional values or something will be the next generation. But we’re kind of like the leveling that, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Like we’re going to create a reactionary, pain in the ass kind of response, series of responses for the establishment is what you’re saying.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. We’re going, no, we’re going to kind of, our generation is probably destined to be a kind of conservative reaction that restabilizes things and then restabilizes things into a new phase of stable prosperity and conditions. And then a generation that will then exist in that, in those better social conditions and those freedoms will then use those freedoms to then turn against the values of the old order. And they’ll still be, there will still be these egalitarian ideals that are preserved. They’ll just be, like, toned down by what is going to happen. They’re not going to be overthrown. They’re not going to be reversed. They’re just going to be toned down and made pragmatic. And therefore they’re going to be stripped of all of their ideological zeal.

 

Because when Christianity got toned down, then it ended up being basically liquidated, because once it stopped having confidence to go and, like, persecute its enemies and impose itself upon society, that created the freedom for people to attack it, and then it was attacked.

 

So a lot of people have this idea that, like, revolutions happen when governments get too tyrannical. They overstep the mark and then the revolution happens. But that’s actually not how it works in history. In history, revolutions happen when you have a government that gets too tyrannical, oversteps the mark, and then a couple successions of that government later, then they start getting soft.

 

And then when they’re soft, that’s when the revolution happens. Because weakness is what gets you overthrown, not strength. A strong tyrant never gets overthrown. They just fucking kick ass!

 

So like what? Like, basically what will happen is a kind of weakening of the ideological fabric of the current order by the pragmatic concerns of fixing the crisis. And then that will create conditions where then the culture that was created by the Boomers and reached its full maturation in recent years in the retardation of the cult of egalitarianism and diversity and all of this, that will then be weak and it will be possible for it to be attacked by a new, the next generation. Our children, basically, as they come into maturation, their youth culture will be the thing that actually goes at it hard and completely upends all of its values.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s an interesting theory and you articulated it really well. Very insightful. Feels to be true. Does feel to be true.

 

Joel Davis: Well, it’s just a theory.

 

Blair Cottrell: We should start wrapping the, … Yeah, I know. Everything is just a theory at the end of the day, except our ethnicity. That’s no theory! Who we are is no theory. We need to wrap it up because I’m falling asleep, man.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’m going to wrap it up.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is there another couple of Superchats to go through before we finish?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, there’s one from Carne Ash, I don’t know how to pronounce that. Says:

 

“This is why the brown-brown “alliance” burgeoning on Twitter is retarded! We are only ever allies when it’s for their cause.”

 

I think you meant to say the White-brown alliance. And he put alliance in quotation marks.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I thought the same thing.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I agree that we can’t. Yeah, there is no alliance that we can have with any of these other groups, because at the end of the day, as you said, it’s only when it benefits them. They’re not gonna go out of their way like the Palestinians are gonna go out of their way to support White nationalism. It’s always a one way street with these people. They want our sympathy, but then they want us to adapt our rhetoric to fit them. But they don’t csk.

 

Blair Cottrell: They want us to join their team, as you would say. They want us to join their ethnic team.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! Exactly! And they’re not going to sympathize with us. And their resentment comes out in all kinds of ways, quite clearly. And obviously, when push comes to shove, you might get a few outliers. You might get like a random based. Like, there are random, like, based black guys who are like:

 

“Oh, no, actually, black people suck! They’re not like the White race!”

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re like spiritually White, almost. I call them spiritually White.

 

[2:08:37]

 

Joel Davis: Well, I don’t know. I feel like they’re just house niggers. That’s what they are, house niggers.

 

Blair Cottrell: But X, the old Malcolm X reference, I like it!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the house negroes.

 

Blair Cottrell: He was a good speaker. Malcolm X was one of those rare, like kind of African speakers who just had the vibe. He had the good vibe! He had the charisma, you might say. He held himself well. He was confident and he actually, he actually stuck to his guns too, at the end of the day. Like, he didn’t just tolerate all the bullshit that was going on in Nation of Islam.

 

They weren’t following their own procedures and practices and he called them out on it. They ended up killing him. But I don’t know, man of principle. I think that’s how I understand Malcolm X anyway. But there’s something about the way he speaks and moves that I find interesting. He really stands out as a prominent black nationalist in American history for me.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. I read autobiography before many, many years ago and he was an interesting figure. A rare black man that seemed to have something about it, a bit of authenticity, and quite intelligent for a black man. And yeah, he’s an interesting figure.

 

Obviously, I don’t sympathize with his cause, but at the same time, I respect someone like him. Because he wanted black independence, he genuinely wanted separation, he wanted black dignity, he wanted his people to go their own way and carve out a authentic path for themselves independently of the Whiteman. Not be dependent upon asking the Whiteman for anything, not being the victim, by going their own way. And I respect that’s the only way that you can respect another group when they want to stand on their own two feet.

 

Actually, I saw something on Twitter, actually. Apparently the Kenyan government has said:

 

“That all blacks around the world have the right to immigrate to Kenya for life if they want to. If they want to. If they’re sick of being oppressed in America by racism, they can immigrate to Kenya.”

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think they’ll go! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but so anyway, so any blacks watching, go to Kenya. Shut the fuck up!

 

But yeah, like that you can use that as well. Whenever you talk to a black, just tell them to go to Kenya. Like they’re free to go and live in Kenya with a bunch of blacks. And Kenya is a peaceful place, as far as I know. War or anything going on there. They got jobs. You know, it’s not as prosperous as a White country, obviously, but the people there living just fine. Go to Kenya! Go to Nairobi or whatever. Get a job!

 

Blair Cottrell: Become a long distance! Go to Kenya and run for Kenya in the Olympics. That’s what they’re good at, isn’t it? Long distance running.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the Kenyans kill it! Kill it at long distance running.

 

Also, I want to mention, I am going to be doing a Twitter space in about 15 minutes after the show is over, I’m going to do my Twitter space. So I’ll put a link on Telegram and look on Twitter if you want to listen to that. Should be a conversation with Pox Populi, so, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re a powerhouse! It’s approaching 11:00 pm here in Australia. We’ve been streaming for just over 2 hours and ten minutes, and Joel’s gonna keep at it! He’s gonna take a 15 minutes break, grab a drink, and he’s gonna keep at it! He’s a powerhouse! I can’t even stay awake, man. So I’m getting ready to clear out.

 

I just remember some people were trying to figure out what the slogan on my jumper says. I think it says “Enemy Minds”, and I think it’s a band. Do the band Enemy Mind or Enemy Minds Joel?

 

Joel Davis: No! It’s like, what do you have the band shirt, if you don’t know the band?

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s my girlfriend’s jumper. I just came back from holiday and, like, I, you know, haven’t done any washing or anything like that.

 

Joel Davis: I’m surprised that anything that she has fits you because, …

 

Blair Cottrell: She buys really baggy ones, like they’re like triple XL or something. So they’re kind of like universal. They fit her and me. They’re kind of the cute girlfriend wear the jumper at home thing and then normal fit for me. So, yeah, it works.

 

Joel Davis: I like that look. Ladies wearing like, just like a Hoodie or like a baggy shirt. It’s a good, like, nothing else, really, other than that, really. It’s a good look, in my opinion.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I agree. I agree. It’s a relaxed look.

 

Joel Davis: I don’t necessarily love all my clothes getting stolen, though. Women have a tendency to do that they just take all your shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: But I have the opposite problem. They always used to leave stuff at my house deliberately so they had a reason to come back. [chuckling]

 

Anyway, guys, thanks very much for joining us. Sorry if I was a bit tired and not articulating myself so well tonight. I’ve just had a hectic week. That’s part of the reason we rescheduled to tonight in the first place. So thanks for tolerating me. And thanks for tuning in.

 

We’ll be back next week as usual. Take care.

 

[2:13:36]

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/29/2024 = 84)

Muh Fashy Bookshelf
1 hour ago
Blairs obsession with Napoleon is unfathomable. He literally created modernity, from the secularism to the liberation of the Jews its all been downhill.

1
0
Julius Myshkin
2 hours ago
$25.00
Hey Joel, trying to connect on telegram to share something too long for a super chat. sent a message a few minutes ago on tg to

@joeldavis
.

@BMC1488
4 hours ago
The Trump/Biden debate was about which one kisses black ass the most.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
*women don’t like you commenting on their large clothing

1
0
Euroicism
8 hours ago
HH

4
0

@SammichLubber
8 hours ago
Ghana has an open reimmigration policy towards American blacks as far as I understand.

4
0
Hide replies
DOLO
6 hours ago
Based.

2
0

@BMC1488
5 hours ago
The only problem is there’s no gibs from Whitey over there in Wakanda.

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
Careful Joel. LOL

1
0
scoobyburn
8 hours ago
better not got her undies on

Euroicism
8 hours ago
Race-mixing is a crime against nature.

5
0

@SammichLubber
8 hours ago

@Aus1788
Like I say about Bob Marley. The hgreatest Jamaican had a British father. Go figure.

1
0

@SammichLubber
8 hours ago
Odd how real work building makes one tired.

@Aus1788
8 hours ago
malcolm x wasnt black.. he was a half cast

1
0

@SammichLubber
8 hours ago
Population booms and busts are another natural cycle we’re long overdue for.

1
0

@Aus1788
8 hours ago
no black ios spiritually white..

1
0

@SammichLubber
8 hours ago
What I see that throws off these cycles is tech & population.

1
0
Euroicism
8 hours ago
The White race lost WW2

2
0
scoobyburn
8 hours ago
all wars are bankers wars

1
0

@SammichLubber
8 hours ago
Strong men create good times… times four gets you roughly 80-100 years.

1
0
ChainReaction
8 hours ago
Heil Bruv o/

@Aus1788

1
0

@SammichLubber
8 hours ago
Collet just put up a video supposedly exposing Bronze Age Pervert.

1
0

@Aus1788
8 hours ago

@ChainReaction
exactly 0/

1
0
ChainReaction
8 hours ago
how many wikileaks involving isreal or jews? zero

2
0
ChainReaction
8 hours ago
move on and find a girl who’s family aren’t a bunch of cvnts

2
0
danzimmons
8 hours ago
°/

1
0
scoobyburn
8 hours ago
they got 2 million soldiers everyone is stuffed I

1
0
ChainReaction
8 hours ago
rope stocks gonna make me rich

2
0
Secure the future of our people
8 hours ago
Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1806619775365509431

1
0

@SammichLubber
8 hours ago
The U.S. military is will be speaking Spanish in the next big war.

1
0
BOILING-FROG
8 hours ago
o/

2
0

@Aus1788
8 hours ago
it true qlders are just built better than other Australians

1
0

@SammichLubber
8 hours ago
lol

1
0

@Chaddington
9 hours ago
speak English mate?

@TheGreekQuestion
9 hours ago

@Chaddington
great, so following the advice on Dear Tom has turned you into an incel

@Chaddington
9 hours ago
$14.88
Had a politics/race argument with GF’s boomer family. I calmly countered their open borders retarded stance, which enraged the father into trying to attack me. I stayed composed but now im questioning the relationship. Its made me focus on the GF and now we’re both negative with each other.Thoughts?

2
0
scoobyburn
9 hours ago

2
0

@katana17
9 hours ago
[Joel Davis – Polarisation Phases – with Blair & Tom – Jun 20, 2024 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – Polarisation Phases – with Blair & Tom – Jun 20, 2024 – Transcript

@SammichLubber
9 hours ago
Sounds like an Aussie PatCon.

1
0

@LordVividColours
9 hours ago
Bogan-Waffen

2
0

@LordVividColours
9 hours ago
We call this shithole Derro Terro

1
0

@SammichLubber
9 hours ago
Cypriotic Greeks

1
0

@LordVividColours
9 hours ago
Heard about the spaz but didn’t know he was a full sperg

1
0

@LordVividColours
9 hours ago
I live in Raymond Terrace

scoobyburn
9 hours ago

2
0
Secure the future of our people
9 hours ago
Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1806619775365509431

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
Carl Jung’s AION is a must-read, not light reading though

1
0
Euroicism
9 hours ago
Normies need it simple, most people are not deep thinkers.

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
More

1
0

@Aus1788
9 hours ago
napoleon the jewish emancipator and assimilation advocate

1
0
Blankeon
9 hours ago
Leon Degrelle is an admirable political figure. Stayed true to National Socialism his whole life, even after WW2 was lost.

1
0
Euroicism
9 hours ago
christianity is a jewish psyop, a kind of globalism 1.0

@BigTechExodus
9 hours ago
christianity seems to suffer from its own share of incoherence

@Aus1788
9 hours ago
Jews don’t racially exist.. They were race mixed out of existence! Only half cast jews now

@LordVividColours
9 hours ago
Australian Competency Crisis

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
only 100% pure Bavarian phenotype in Joel’s ethnostate

Patton Was Right
9 hours ago
Pit Bulls love black people

Patton Was Right
9 hours ago
HazelWaffen o/

Patton Was Right
10 hours ago

@Thegoyimknow

Secure the future of our people
10 hours ago
Follow Joel on twitter and Blair, Tom on (telegram)

Tweets by joeldavisx

https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell

https://t.me/realblaircottrell

1
0
Jews R Greedy Demonic Pedos
10 hours ago
why did you fight with me General Patton! at least you admitted you were wrong in the end

1
0
Secure the future of our people
10 hours ago
Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1806619775365509431

Patton Was Right
10 hours ago
(((JUDEN)))

Jews R Greedy Demonic Pedos
10 hours ago
((((((Jews))))))

Patton Was Right
10 hours ago
(((US)))

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
the whole West has to suffer because of US bs

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago
better to just stick to english if you dont understand german

Jews R Greedy Demonic Pedos
10 hours ago
Jew puppet A or Jew puppet B the choice is your goyim!

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@Thegoyimknow
for what little its worth…. its “Ausländer raus” which if you dont know german just means foreigners/invaders out

1
0
C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago

@DanTheOracle
fuck off

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago
a con man

Jews R Greedy Demonic Pedos
10 hours ago
outlander out, outlander out, Germany for Germans, outlander out! that means you kike!!!

1
0

@GoyBoy1488
10 hours ago
$14.88
greetings from the
4:30
am work crew in the USA. keep up the good work down under lads!

1
0

@DanTheOracle
10 hours ago

@JoeBorackOBiden
lol welcome back.. hows it feel to get banned from black pilled’s chat?

Jews R Greedy Demonic Pedos
10 hours ago
o/

1
0
Euroicism
10 hours ago
Two jewish homosexual spastic commie child molesting retards have sneaked in and given this video a splat before it even starts.

2
0

@Aus1788
10 hours ago
official indoctrination completion

Forza
10 hours ago
G’day, G’evening, G’morning, G’whatever it is

@LordVividColours
10 hours ago
I may have jinx’d it

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago
I wonder whos the two fags that splatted this

Hide replies

@BMC1488
4 hours ago
A couple of jewish faggots.

Anglo-Saxon
10 hours ago
o/

1
0
C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago
o/

1
0

@LordVividColours
10 hours ago
just in time

1
0

==========================

See Also

top