Monika Schaefer

The Flipside with Monika

Ep 04 with Oscar

Sat, Jul 20, 2024

[In this weekly podcast episode on Republic Broadcasting Network, Canadian nationalist and author, Monika Schaefer talks with long time fellow Canadian nationalist and founding member of the Truth and Justice for Germans Society, Oscar.

This discuss historical events, especially WWII, the “Holocaust”, 9/11, conspiracy theories, the demonization of Germans, race relations, democracy, nutrition, etc., from the perspective that we have been deceived about these topics, by the (((usual suspects))).

And btw, Monika very graciously gives myself and this blog a plug! Thank you Monika!

– KATANA]

https://www.republicbroadcastingarchives.org/the-flipside-with-monika-july-20-2024/

https://freespeechmonika.com

https://gab.com/MonikaSchaefer

Published on Sat, Jul 20, 2024

Description

Print this article Send e-mail
The Flipside with Monika, July 20, 2024
RBN
By RBN
July 20, 2024 20:18
Related Articles
The Flipside with Monika, July 13, 2024 2 13.Jul
The Flipside with Monika, June 29, 2024 13 29.Jun
The Flipside with Monika, July 6, 2024 4 06.Jul
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS
Episode 4 of the Flipside with Monika show notes: Today’s guest is Oscar, one of the founding members of the Truth and Justice for Germans Society.
Social media
Share this article
Print this article Send e-mail
RBN
By RBN
July 20, 2024 20:18

_____________

TRANSCRIPT QUALITY = 5 Stars

1 Star — Poor quality with many errors, contains nonsense text 2 Stars — Low quality with many errors, some nonsense text. 3 Stars — Medium quality with some errors. 4 Stars — Good quality with only a few errors. 5 Stars — High quality with few to no errors.

NOTE: Users can help improve the quality of this transcript by putting corrections in the Comment/Leave a Reply section. Thanks.

TRANSCRIPT

(Words: 6,303 – 1:00:00 mins)

[Intro music]

[01:05]

[Morgoth reviews a section of Edward Bernays’ book “Crystallizing Public Opinion” where Bernays discusses the methods to manipulate established public opinion, where he used

— KATANA]

Morgoth’s Review

Edward Bernays

The Group and the Herd

Jul 1, 2020

Click here for the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PwIIunMDhE

Published on Jul 1, 2020

YouTube Description

31.7K subscribers
Buy me a pint here

https://www.subscribestar.com/morgoth…

https://www.patreon.com/Morgoth

https://ko-fi.com/K3K3RSEG

Bitchute

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/morg…

Thanks to Theberton for the intros and outros

TRANSCRIPT

(21:13)

[00:00]

[Intro music and imagery by Theberton.]

[00:24]

Hello there folks. On a recent video, the Civilization one, I took a look at history through the prism of technology. That technology was the driving force of history. Played around with that idea and took away a lot of where that’s going to lead us, where it is leading us. And in that I kind of side-lined the idea that there’s people pulling strings and manipulating people according to a certain plan, and that kind of thing.

And I wanted sort of go right back in that direction on this one. And look at, in this case it’s a book I’ve been reading by Edward Bernays. So Edward Bernays is the nephew of Sigmund Freud, similar ((((heritage))), of course, and he has a few books, which I’ve been reading his one called “Crystallizing Public Opinion”.

And Bernays went from Austria to America, and once he got there he began to apply the thinking of Sigmund Freud psychology, of course, psychoanalysis. And Bernays wasn’t interested in it at the individual level, so much as he was in mass manipulation. How you can use psychoanalysis and psychology to play on the fears and manipulate the masses. And he’s written some books about it. And one of them which I’m reading is called “Crystallizing Public Opinion”. In particular, Part Two, which is called “The Group and the Herd”. And Chapter One, “What Constitutes Public Opinion”.

So people may know of Bernays from Adam Curtis documentary, “Century of the Self”, which is a brilliant documentary. But Curtis’ documentary is looking at how Capital did this, how they molded the public and public perception. It touches on the Frankfurt School.

But Bernie’s runs alongside of that. Obviously similar background, but he’s not coming at it from the neo-Marxist, or whatever you want to call, side of it. It’s about psychology. But the effects of it on discourse, and on the West, beginning with America, are very similar.

So the problem that what Bernays is going to do here is look for ways at the public and the opinions of a public and how they view the world can be manipulated. And he ended up working for cigarette companies, big money. And then eventually what you could call like the sort of the “proto-deep state”. So and in his book “Crystallizing Public Opinion” and the other one which is just called “Propaganda”, he’s really like straight out saying like:

“This is what we do!”

It’s really surprising just reading how balls-out it is, how in your face it is! He’s not trying to hide anything.

But what I found interesting about the chapter “What Constitutes Public Opinion” is that Bernays is going to approach the problem of how you manipulate the masses. And he’s going to raise a few issues, which I think can resonate with people in dissident Right circles today. Because I think that when you mention somebody like Bernays, or you mentioned people like Horkheimer, Adorno, there’s this knee-jerk reaction to, sort of, they’re just like bogeyman! And there’s too few people looking into the text that what it is they’re actually saying. And I like this idea of demystifying them and their ideas. And in some cases they’re actually approaching problems which people in the dissident Right are focused with.

And you can see it with Bernays straight away, because the problem that he’s, what I find interesting in this chapter, is he’s gonna come up with a problem that if you want to, let’s say from his perspective it would be to red pill the masses. But the problem that he comes up against is that the masses have already been programmed. Somebody’s already been there and done it. And he says they’re getting their opinions from the radio at this time, from the newspapers, from the church, from the schools. And so, they’ve got this “deadwood” that needs to be cleared away. And he wants to figure out how that can be done. And he’s gonna play around with a lot of ideas here.

[05:00]

But what’s interesting is that you can see here this idea that we’re all rational liberals. And that we all form our opinions based on our own reason, is actually complete rubbish! He doesn’t believe that at all! And he sees it again, and again, and again! And so for an example there’s this part where he says:

“The religious man accuses the atheist of being shallow and irrational, and is met by a similar reply. To the Conservative, the amazing thing about the Liberal is his incapacity to see reason and accept the only possible solution of public problems. Examination reveals the fact that the differences are not due to the commission of the mere mechanical fallacies of logic, since these are easily avoided, even by the politician. And since there is no reason to believe that one party in such controversies is less logical than the other.”

And so what he means is that people already have their own preconceptions and their own biases about the world that they’ve already been programmed, and that you can’t talk them out of them.

Now this is something that’s going to resonate with a lot of people who watch this video, because we run up against this every day. We talk about how do you red pill normies, how do you red pill the masses, how do you convince them of our opinions? And again, and again, we come back to the problem that they’ve already had another set of ideas, and another set of biases, handed to them by the media. It’s just the media today is much more sophisticated than in Bernays’ time.

But nevertheless he’s still touching on something, which is very similar. And he goes on to say:

“The difference is due rather to the fundamental assumptions of the antagonists being hostile, and these assumptions are derived from herd-suggestions.”

Now as I showed in the title he again, again, and again, throughout what I’ve been reading by him, he’s got nothing but contempt for the masses, and he literally calls them “a herd”. And it’s about how you manipulate the herd. And there’s a famous passage somewhere where he says:

“All of your opinions and what you think of as your take on the world, is literally being written elsewhere by people that you’ve never heard of!”

And it’s as if Bernays wants to get in on the action. And he is actually hired to do this. But we’re going to get into an example of that later, and the most famous one, of course, now:

“To the Liberal certain basic conceptions have acquired the quality of instinctive truth, have become a priori syntheses, because of the accumulated suggestions to which he has been exposed; and a similar explanation applies to the atheist, the Christian, and the Conservative. Each, it is important to remember, finds in consequence the rationality of his position flawless and is quite incapable of detecting in it the fallacies which are obvious to his opponent, to whom that particular series of assumptions has not been rendered acceptable by herd suggestion.”

So what he’s getting at here is that if you think that the basic standard — in Britain that would be the Conservative voter and then the Liberal, the Labour voter — they both have their own fundamental truths and it’s handed to them by the media that they consume, by the church, or in the Left it would be the University, and then so on. So they are forming their opinions and then they belong to a herd, and then that herd reinforces all of those opinions. And even when you show them something, which is flat-out wrong, they will merely sort of fall back on, and draw from their own sources, to create the narrative all of their own.

And so Bernays is interested, because he needs to change this. So, at this point, he is faced with the same problem that dissident people do. And he goes on:

“Thus the public relations counsel, …”

He’s talking about basically being the deep state, the public relations counsel, as he calls it. There’s this kind of interconnection between the American government and big money, as there is today. Much more so today, in fact, largely based on some of the ideas that Bernays got into. So this:

“Public relations counsel has to consider that a priori judgment of any public he deals with before counseling any step that would modify those things in which the public has an established belief.”

So what he’s saying here is that when you hit them directly with counter evidence, facts which run against the grain of their narrative, they just reject them. This is the problem that he’s facing.:

“It is seldom effective to call names, or to attempt to discredit the beliefs themselves. The counsel on public relations, after examination of the sources of established beliefs, must either discredit the old authorities, or create new authorities by making articulate a mass opinion against the old belief, or in favor of the new, … The average citizen is the world’s most efficient censor. His own mind is the greatest barrier between him and the facts. His own ‘logic-proof compartments,’ his own absolutism, are the obstacles which prevent him from seeing in terms of experience and thought rather than in terms of the group.”

[10:46]

So, what Bernays is saying here, is that when you’re directly antagonistic to these people, if you just, obviously as he says, calls them names, or if you just trash their arguments outright, it isn’t actually very productive.

What you do instead — there’s two parts to this — there’s, you have to speak from authority, which is nigh on impossible. But, if you get a large enough presence on social media, or you form your own political party, you can reframe these things where you’re speaking to somebody’s gut instincts, rather than just being negative.

And the second part of that, is that you don’t antagonize them. And so you’re speaking from authority. And then the second part is that you give them a new narrative upon which they can not trash their old opinions, that will come later, instead what you’re doing is supplanting one narrative, one worldview, with your own.

And this is what Bernays perfected. This is what’s being done so successfully in the West. And you can see it just in the riots and all of the trouble going on for the last few months. And as I’ve said, like ad nauseam on this channel, to be honest, it’s all backed up by all of these PR companies, advertising agencies. You can see how it all links together. It’s just that it’s much more sophisticated now than in Bernays’ time. But here’s the man who is widely regarded to have come up with it all. And he’s got some very interesting books about it.

So, what he’s most famous for is the cigarette advertising campaign, where he was hired by a few different companies. And the problem that they had was that women in America, it was considered taboo for women in America to smoke cigarettes. Now this is a problem, because it means that essentially that big business have lost half of the potential buyers of cigarettes, which is a hell of a lot of money! And they hired Bernays to come up with PR campaigns and advertising techniques, where they could get women smoking.

And so just to go back on the earlier point that he was making there, the one thing that you could do is to hit the taboos dead on. But that would antagonize them. So, he’s gonna use his own techniques here. And eventually what he came up with this idea. If you look at all of the — on Google Images as I did — all of the pictures, the advertisements being used of women, are just women with a cigarette. And the “torches of freedom” as they called it.

The women in the advertisements, they don’t have a husband there, or a man. They don’t have a father figure. They aren’t portrayed as daughters, and they don’t have children. There’s just the women! Just a woman. And the narrative which is being given to them is that they are now “free”! They are now “liberated” and it’s a positive vision, something for them to aspire to.

And I’ll describe this Wikipedia page:

“Because it should appear as, …”

This is Bernays:

“Because it should appear as news with no division of the publicity, actresses should be definitely out.”

He wants to make this look normal:

“On the other hand, if young women who stand for feminism someone from the Woman’s Party say — could be secured, the fact that the movement would be advertised too, would not be bad, … While they should be good-looking, they should not be too ‘model-y’. Three for each church covered should be sufficient. Of course, they are not to smoke, simply as they come down the church steps. They are to join in the Easter Parade, puffing away.”

So it’s not to be connected with the traditional family, because that’s the old narrative. He doesn’t want to hit it straight on. Instead, he’s creating a NEW vision and a NEW image and it will be of the woman alone, liberated from men! The feminist movement is just coming in here. You see that big business, big capital, is absolutely on board with what would be perceived as being a left-wing movement, a feminist movement! And you can see that they complement each other perfectly.

And that the image of the woman with a cigarette is kind of like a crypto, proto-feminist image. And yet, it’s coming from big capital.

[15:32]

This leaves us onto something else, because it’s been a hot topic recently in dissident Right circles where people have been much more vocal in attacking big money, big capitalism, because it was standard to say, well, lay all of this squarely at the foot of Marxism. And then to say the end result will be that we all live in, … Basically they’re going to deconstruct everything about Western civilization, all of our norms, all of our traditions, and they will then bring in the Communist revolution.

And yet here we have Bernays, and as I say, in literature, and so on, he often runs alongside the Frankfurt School. He has the same (((heritage))) and he is a kind of a foreigner to America. And that means he can stand outside of the normal cultural fabric and attack it, and undermine it, and study it, from that perspective, which is more difficult if you’re a native and you’re submerged in it.

But you can see here that the problem is that big money, big capital, employed him to subvert the values, just in the cigarette advertisements here. There was more. And I think I’m gonna do more videos on this, as well. I just want to focus on this little part here.

You can see here that it was corporations who hired him to study how you can then begin to break down these more conservative, more traditional, values and all of that they can open up what was then half of the market of America, which was women. And needless to say, tens of millions of women will have died of lung cancer, because of this. And Bernays himself was adamantly opposed to smoking and I didn’t want his wife to smoke either. But later on in his life he did get on board the anti-smoking thing.

But the point here is that this is a cultural value, a cultural more which was a good one, and it was a healthy one. And it was abolished. And feminism went alongside big money here. So we have to have a closer look at the role that big capital, high finance, has played in the current state of the West today. And it triggers a lot of people, because you’re going to be called a Marxist, you’re gonna be called, you know, you’re just a communist. But nevertheless we have here a clear example of capital hiring somebody to break down the mores and values, to open up markets.

And we can see this happening again, and again, and again, in fact. Mass immigration will be another one.

But just to get back to the basic narrative which is an interesting one for this particular chapter here. When we get into the how we kind of confront people, if you want to use Bernays, or if you’re in a dissident movement, you can whittle his advice down to three different points.

And it’s number one, don’t antagonize. Number two, replace the source. And, three, use the source to replace the narrative.

So you have to get into a position where you can dish out your narrative. You do not have to be completely antagonistic to everybody else around you. It’s actually why I find debates to be a waste of time, because it’s exactly what Bernays is talking about with the sort of Left-Right dichotomy. Everybody is just gonna dig in to their own trenches. You’re not going to get anywhere. If you opened up a third trench, a “third position”,  you might say.

But when you’re deliberately antagonistic all it does is reinforce people’s beliefs and they’re going to get on the defensive. You replace the source, obviously, so you you can peddle your narrative.

And then instead of being completely antagonistic, you just replace the narrative, you know, with your own, which is followed by words that are positive, or speaking some sort of fundamental truth. And then you’ll find that people from elsewhere will move towards you.

This is an interesting way to look at this, in how you manage the masses. But what’s most interesting is that you can get rid of all of these liberal preconceptions that all of the people, all of the normies, have all arrived at their positions through their own reason. It’s not the case.

And the people who control the discourse, the people who control the culture, and set the running here, they know it as well! The only people who think they’ve arrived at their own opinions, that we live in this society where everybody is rational, and everybody has come to their understanding of the world through their own volition, is completely deluded!

And when we can just step over these false preconceptions about the world we might actually get somewhere.

So I think I’m gonna carry on reading this and do another video, because I think we need more stuff like this.

So, thanks for listening folks, and I’ll catch you later.

[20:57]

[Outro music and imagery by Theberton.]

[21:13]

END

============================================

============================================

See Also

Millennium Woes with Morgoth on Brexit — TRANSCRIPT

Millennial Woes’ Millenniyule 2017 No. 66 – Morgoth — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – YouTube Hangout 01 – Skeptics and Cucks — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – YouTube Hangout 02 – Merry Holocaustmas — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review — Discussing the Government’s Anti-Extremism Agency ”Prevent” With Based British — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review — Hate-Reading The Guardian – Hirsch, Critical Theory & Nihilism, Jan 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review — The Psychotic Left, Feb 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – Fishing For White Pills, Feb 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Morgoth’s Review – Hope Not Hate and the State of Play, Feb 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

============================================

Here is the English transcript of a speech given by Horst Mahler on Jan 9, 2017 on the genocidal “mission” that organized jewry is engaged in against non-jews, especially Whites and in particular Germans, and the need to fight back through exposing this diabolical “mission” to all — KATANA.

NOTE: 

Text Source: 

https://archive.org/details/WEAREFIGHTINGTOWINCorrected

A video of this speech is available here for download:

https://archive.org/details/HorstMahlerWeAreFightingToWin

Horst Mahler

We are Fighting to Win

______________________

TRANSCRIPT

Friends, ladies and gentlemen!

Of course I’m particularly pleased to be close to Mannheim when being among you because this has a certain meaning. A lot has happened, and there is a completely changed situation. Seven or eight years ago, one could not have imagined this. This means, we should assess the current situation within our possibilities to see where we stand; and I think, we still have a lot to learn. There has been a lot of movement causing many in our circles to be enthusiastic and even euphoric, and they now want to be freed by Trump or Putin.

Movement is good and important but can also go into the wrong direction. Do we have a direction in this movement? The enemy has long prepared for the situation we are suffering today and plays a significant part in the mix of things we see. Perhaps it has not yet really sunk into our consciousness: The war aim No.1, committed to by Stalin and Roosevelt, was the liquidation of the German people through mixing them with masses of peoples of alien cultures. This program has been played out for over 70 years and has now reached a point where one can speculate: Are they so sure of their success that they drop all their respect and masks? Or are they in a panic because they sense that their calculations are not panning out 100 percent?

What’s important for us is that we have our own position in this movement and its development. Much is said about unity, and calls for some kind of actions are plenty, but it’s never clear what is really meant. Are we united, or are there significant differences of opinion in the situation we are in that could lead us into a disaster? I believe we still do not even really comprehend the enemy we are dealing with. This enemy is not only our enemy since 1939 but for hundreds of years. This enemy thinks in view of thousands of years and has a clear vision of his goal. The enemy believes to be striving for this goal by divine order and so is completely free from every scruple and any kind of human stirring. He wants to obey his God. His God says to the Jews:

“I am angered by all the heathen and their masses (that’s their warriors). I will give them up to their slaughter so that their corpses stink up to heaven and the mountains flow with blood.”

It’s not written in a cheap novel; it’s written in the Old Testament. It is an announcement by a major prophet of these people, Isaiah, along the lines of Moses.

I am arguing from the assumption that what is written in the Bible is believed. For only this makes the difference: what people believe moves them, and not whether it developed this way. Their belief moves mountains. And there it says that Moses is commanding this small tribe, the Jews, to exterminate, destroy, and murder, in the true sense of the word, many tribes greater than their own. And then he advises moreover:

“But do not do this too quickly. For if you work it too swiftly, then wild beasts will move in again to occupy the space freed by murdering. Do it slowly and gently!”

And then there is one of their fundamental principles:

“Let these crimes appear as good deeds, and see to it — with all these nasty works I command you to do to the peoples — that no shadow falls upon Yahweh.”

This is the order: Through hypocrisy, lies, and deception, commit the worst crimes with the aim to destroy humanity as a whole, with the exception of the chosen people. This has a very concrete reason. We still don‟t comprehend this! This is not some kind of fantasy or mental illness, but as our German philosophers found out, a world historical development for the Jews; and world history is under the influence of reason for the Jews, as it is for us. But it is a development.

We don‟t just find the world in a certain condition; instead, it’s a development coming primarily from thinking. We always talk about “the culture of being German” (Deutschtum). But what is it? What is special about Germans? The Germans have discovered an art of thinking that includes a Higher Being, God. This is, however, diametrically opposed to the thinking that comes from the Jews. The thinking of the Jews cannot comprehend the Higher Being of God. Theirs is the thinking of our everyday life that deals with finite objects. May I offer you the option to think that all I am saying here is nonsense. Naturally, I cannot, in an hour, go into all the details of the foundations of my thinking that result in the assessment of our current situation and the tasks at hand. I can only briefly touch on it and trust that perhaps only two, but perhaps even more, will say:

“There is something to this. I must investigate this.”

We have not yet fully comprehended the magnitude of our defeat in two wars never seen in history before. Our defeat is that our independent thinking, the German thinking, has been driven out of us. Our German thinking has become desolate. It’s discriminated against. We talk about German philosophy but no longer practice it. We Germans are not capable, but our enemy surely is, to really grasp what has happened to us.

There is now much talk about Jewry, and Jewry is, in fact, the enemy, and I have long admonished to call the enemy by name. But if the Jew is only called a Jew, then he has not yet been called by his name. For what is his name? In regard to what I understand under name, I want to know what the essence of Jewry is, and what is the essence of the German spirit. These are the two poles in thousands of years of history that are now locked in a deadly and deciding battle.

This enemy that we are up against, has put a great deal of effort into making sure we do not notice what the future actually holds for us; what fate is meant for us. And to make this perhaps a bit more vivid, Hegel, one of the greatest German philosophers, if not the greatest of all, has stated in his early writings about the Jews:

“The Jews do not fight but they conquer, and the Egyptians succumb as if poisoned in their sleep.”

This is the Jewish way of waging war. With a poisoning that we do not perceive as such. And if at one point we wake up one more time, we’ll rub our eyes and tell ourselves:

“What is going on? How could this have been possible?”

What is history? History is a divine destiny, a God-sent fate. And I can only just put this out there, but it is all well-founded and deliberated in the idealistic German philosophy. Whereby people always connect it to the image, “the one up there with the beard.” No! German philosophy has found that God is not at all conceivable in the way it has been presented to us as children. For if God were up there and we are here, God would have a limit and end where we start. But then he would be finite and not God. And this challenge, how to see God, is the essence of German philosophy.

This begins with a cobbler from Görlitz with no higher education but a mind that could think clearly. He has been concerned with the question: How can I think God, in the face of the cruel circumstances and the misfortunes and catastrophes that we somehow encounter every day in this world. This is the starting point of German philosophy, and it ends so that we cannot even think Atheism, a world without God. Precisely with this contemplation, if God and man were separated, then God would be finite, and, therefore, not God. For according to our concept, God is infinite, omnipresent, omnipotent, and so forth. The Germans have recognized a God who appears only as mankind, who is in us and we are in him. And spirit is what makes us who we are. We say that man is spirit, in contrast to the animal. That is the basis. And this will be today the basis of our actual debate. Why? History is a development. It has a beginning and an end at some point and is constantly moving. It begins and is a great advance with Yahweh.

This is the concept of God that has become powerful in the Hebrew people. He is the sublime one and has nothing to do with man, and he sees in the peoples who are here, a competitive God, an idol. And he commends this small nation, the smallest, as he himself says, to destroy all peoples, so that he is the only one, and thus infinite, and thus truly God. This is the task given to the Jews, a task that is still today being fulfilled by Jewry. They are determined to literally destroy the peoples.

Whereby the term “extermination” also refers to their enslavement.

“Either the nations subordinate themselves, then we let them live like cattle, to our advantage. Or they oppose the enslavement or degradation into animals, then we‟ll kill them.”

This is the goal of these people from the beginning, and it has never been abandoned. And they are today in the process of leading this entire development into a final crisis, with the idea that the entire world, the whole of mankind, can be completely enslaved. How? With what? Of course with money. And if this does not work then comes Armageddon.

“Then mankind shall perish. If we are to perish, lose our power, then they should also be extinguished.”

This is the war we are confronted with.

Clausewitz is one of the greatest war theorists, even from the perspective of German philosophy. For the end of the year, I have sent out a text to friends called “Is it really war?”

Because, according to Clausewitz’s definition, war is when one wants to impose his will on another by force, and the other defends himself. This is war. And then he writes:

“If you do not resist, then there is no war.”

And the question is, do we resist the annihilator? We are not at all able to defend ourselves. Let’s leave out the material ways, namely the guns, the rockets and so forth; it does not matter anyway. It is a spiritual conflict. For this spiritual confrontation we are not at all equipped, the way we are today in the world, in this country. For we do not know that there is a fundamental difference between thinking that Jewry embodies, that is thinking with the intellect where A is always only A, and not at the same time B, the opposite. Whereas German thought proceeds precisely from the other principle. German philosophy has discovered that contradiction is the sign of truth.

Since antiquity, the Jews have been a highly intellectual nation, and they have developed the thinking principle where A is always A, and not B at the same time, and that which contradicts itself cannot be true. Therefore, it’s exactly the opposite of our German thinking. And what operates in peoples is their thinking. So here we have two fundamentally different thinking systems. But German thought ALSO encompasses Jewish thought. We Germans can also think of finite things and create many finite objects. We can build rockets and airplanes. We can even, like Wernher von Braun, envision flying to the moon. All this is possible but finite and not the thinking that’s at issue, namely the God thinking. We are completely dissuaded from God. The word God only provokes derision and mockery from us. It’s said that man is enlightened, and there is no God. Of course, there is no such God whom the Jews want to talk us into, their Yahweh.

But there is God in the form of the German spirit, representing our people. And every nation is in a certain way a special form in which God appears to recognize himself in mankind. Adolf Hitler once formulated it:

“We humans are the consciousness of God, nothing more.”

This is precisely the core of German philosophy. And then there is the invisible, jealous God Yahweh, who, for the first time, represents himself as such. Before this, people prayed to objects, trees, springs, stones, all something accessible to the senses. In human development, that is in the development of God in himself, the Jews are the first ones who claimed, “God is invisible”. He is not the sun nor the light as with the Persians. He is invisible and not observable with the senses. And this progress is so colossal that Yahweh is polemical to what was before, namely, the worship of visible objects as God. He does not want to be this anymore. He only wants to be the invisible one. But then Yahweh has — of course this is quite obvious to the Jews — a world of pure senses before him: the peoples, cattle, forests; namely nature. And this cannot be reconciled with the Jews’ idea of God. And this is the development they forced for the first time and have evaluated all peoples, who oriented themselves on visible objects and honored them as God, as cattle. They still say in the Talmud:

“Only the Jews are human beings. The Gentiles are like cattle.”

One must know what meaning the Talmud has for the Jews up to the present day. They want to keep the Talmud secret but one should spend some time on it. In times past, the Jews, if they could get a hold of them, killed non-Jews who read the Old Testament or the Talmud. They wanted to keep all of it to themselves, and they know exactly why. Because if these things become known, if they become consciousness — I have quoted some of it — then they have lost. And now I am coming to the point that is of our concern.

We can defeat the Jews. We can start today, and it will not be long before we have really defeated them. We’ve started. How? We have begun to bring into man’s consciousness the nature of Jewry as the real form of Satan. There are already many valuable books where this is depicted. Glagau is perhaps known in this group as one who has dealt with the Talmud.

There was Talmud research over the years and has produced many books. But this has all remained below the consciousness threshold of the general public. The Jews have always managed to hide this evidence somewhere in a corner. They have calculated in our good nature and innocence. They knew that the peoples, especially the Germans, are so kind as to be unable to imagine that the Jews, as Satan, want to destroy them. The peoples do not realize this because they cannot imagine that there exists, someone like the Jews, who in the name of God are to genocide them. Moses explicitly preaches genocide. I have already quoted here:

“But do not kill them too quickly. Do it slowly; but do kill them.”

“Do not marry them, do not become relatives, do not let them dwell with you, but drive them out. For otherwise you may become apostates.”

And these are things we must bring into the consciousness of the masses. Why?

I believe it is a great neglect by our people that we have not precisely investigated with the German spirit, the German philosophy, how it is possible that the majority still swallows these formidable lies they have been tormenting us with for 70 years. How many stand up and say, “This is a lie.”? And many who do not stand up really believe the Jews. They are not vicious. And you have to contemplate how this is possible? And this is where psychology plays a role. The Jews are the best psychologists and sociologists. Why? Because, as a small tribe, they go up against great peoples and can only accomplish this if they carefully study the weaknesses of the others and then play them out against each other.

Typical for the Jewish style of warfare is the German fairy tale “The Brave Little Tailor”. How does he fight? There you have the snoring giants under this tree, and up in the tree is the little tailor with a bag full of small stones, and he throws them at the sleeping giants. And each giant thinks it was the other one. So they get into a fight and get so excited that they kill each other. The “brave” little tailor then stands up and says:

“I have conquered the giants”.

How do the Jews accomplish things? They are dealing with a special people here. No other tribe, and this can be proved, is so good-natured as the Germans and ready to see in all men the good. By the way, the Chinese name for the German people is “The Land of Virtue”. The others are aware of this. We are not aware of it. We only act accordingly, and we embrace the Jews, thinking they are human beings. And then comes the Jew, Karl Marx, and says:

“The Jews are not humans”.

That is, he is turning it exactly around. The Jews in the Talmud say:

“Only the Jews are humans and the non- Jews are like cattle.”

Then Karl Marx shows up and says, quite correctly:

“The Jews are not humans,” and, “The task of history is to emancipate Jewry to mankind.”

And then there is a famous Jew, also well known by the gentiles, Martin Buber, who lived in the forties of the last century, who says simply and poignantly:

“Jewry represents the negation of life of the Peoples.”

And he does not say this as an aside, he claims this in his writings about the Bible. He writes:

“We Jews pretend to teach the Absolute, that is, God, but we teach only the negation to the life of the peoples.”

And then he corrects himself and says:

“No, we ARE the negation of life to the peoples!”

Well, what is THAT? Death! And who is the devil? He who wants to spoil us, that is, bring us death. Death by God’s commissioned agents. This is what the Jewish people were ordained for. This means, they can only operate with their lies because they misuse our special sensitivity for morality.

And so it was Jews, and not Goebbels, who discovered that:

“The lie must just be big enough and be repeated endlessly to be believed as truth.”

And what did we learn in school? That this was the Maxim of National Socialist propaganda. But the truth is laid down in a book written by Jew Edward Bernays. He was a nephew of Sigmund Freud and well acquainted with psychoanalysis — a Jewish discovery, and a very important one — and studied how man could be manipulated via these emotional mechanisms. Bernays wrote “Propaganda”, and in the Anglo-Saxon, “propaganda” is equal to “lie”. Bernays developed this and said:

“We can force through any lie. It just has to be big enough so that a normal person says, ‘Well, that cannot be a lie!’ Then the lie cannot be recognized as such. And the lie has to be repeated continuously. Then it is believed and is powerful because it is the belief in a ‘truth.’”

And we dare not question the Jews. We do not dare to recognize these principles as part of a Jewish “weapons factory” in order to cast us down. They just simply claimed that these were the Maxims of Goebbels. Goebbels quoted from Bernays book, “Propaganda”, in order to convey the enemy propaganda to the Germans. And then they lie and say:

“These were his Maxims. This is how he manipulated people.”

The Germans are manipulated and do not comprehend what the purpose was to present Hitler to the world as an evil power of darkness. This is how they present it. The Jews are thus able to use our moral sensitivity for their diabolical purposes, through manipulation. And then we got them by their neck; this is their weakness. Namely, if we recognize this and pronounce it out loudly.

I say, we make it into a scandal in that we go to the “Gutmenschen” (derogatory — people who think they are so good in what they are doing), to the Antifa and tell them:

“You are disciples of the devil! You protect those who, for example, consider child sexual abuse as normal, as long as it is a non-Jewish child!”

In the Talmud it is written:

“Once a girl is three years and a day she can be used sexually. This is not fun for the child and one should let it be, but you may do it.”

And then in the Talmud, and not just in the Talmud but also in the Old Testament, it states:

“The Gentiles can be robbed.”

Goethe then wrote:

“These people [*the Jews] have a faith that allows them to rob strangers.”

And this statement has been removed from the edition newly released in German. This is their religious belief. This is not somehow a writer who has come up with this, no, this is written in their holy books. The Talmud is even more important for the Jews than the Old Testament. Therein it states:

“The best of the Gentiles you shall kill.”

Anyone who is a bit at home in mathematics knows that it really says all non-Jews are to be killed. Why? If today “A” is the best and therefore is killed, then “B”, as the second best, moves to the position of the best and must be killed. And this goes all the way down until nobody is left. This is then repeated again quite decidedly by great Jewish minds, like Maimonides, who lived in the Middle Ages:

“Kill the best of the non-Jews!”

And this consciousness, we must awaken in our people. I am absolutely convinced that they cannot get the German people to support these satanic ways in the world. Because we are not dealing with fantasies.

The Jews operate without us being conscious of it. The great wars, not only of the twentieth century, but also before, are everywhere the works of these people. Somehow they put themselves in good standing with the princes, made them dependent on money, and then played them out against each other, and so initiated wars. And so we always end up having some enemies, but it is never the enemy who is REALLY behind it all. The Jew has discovered the method of indirect warfare.

Then there is also the Talmudic warfare, and this is not even perceived as war. As von Clausewitz says:

“If you do not resist, it is not war.”

“And the Egyptians die as if poisoned in their sleep.”

And this is what is happening to us. Today we are the Egyptians. And we are dying as if poisoned in our sleep because we do not allow ourselves to suspect the Jews acting in this wickedness against humanity, and not only against the Germans, but especially against the German people. I was not terribly surprised when I read the Talmud — an awful reading in twelve volumes — that they have been constantly praying for centuries.

“Lord,” they mean their God, “let the wicked man”, with this they mean us “not win.” “Let their attacks against us not succeed. They are the Edomite Teutons [*Teutons = ancient Germans!] who, when they come out, would destroy us and the whole world.”

Not so well known here is that this is connecting back to the Esau blessing. The authors Ludendorff are knowledgeable here. The Jews go back to Isaac, who has twins, Esau and Jacob. Esau, the first-born, is actually the one who inherited the fatherly goods and blessing, and the second, Jacob, must see how he manages. Jacob represents the Jews. With the help of the mother, Jacob deceives the blind Isaac and causes him to give his blessing due to the first-born to Jacob instead. Esau goes empty. When Esau discovers that he has been deceived — and we are Esau — there is great lamentation. He talks to his father and asks him:

“Have you not a blessing for me, too?”

The old man replies:

“I have only one blessing, but I have held a small part of it back that I now give to you. You will live by your sword and under severe circumstances. But, one day you will also be master and throw off the yoke.”

This is the Esau blessing the Jews are afraid of. Their fear is so strong that in the Talmud, they have this prayer:

“Lord, let us be spared this; let the Esau blessing fall into oblivion.”

The Jews know very well that the Germans will be the ones who will remove their reign. But the Jews are not to be fought with a pistol, not with a tank, and not with airplanes and rockets, because they are not a visible enemy.

Want to shoot at an enemy that is not visible? Want to arrest him? How? ! We can only catch the enemy where the principle of invisibility is. In spirit. We must expose the Jewish spirit as it is. Then make it clear, from the standpoint of German philosophy, why they are sent out upon mankind. Because the divine consciousness is still undeveloped in the person of Yahweh. He sees himself as the invisible spirit. That is progress. But at the same time, he is jealous of everything visible that was previously worshiped as God. This he does not want. They are idols. He wants to destroy all of them, all the peoples, who represent what is observed with the senses. To this end Yahweh chooses this small tribe, the Jews, to destroy the observable with the senses. And when the Germans comprehend this — those “good people” who build rings of lights around those devils to protect them — that they are protecting the devil and are handing over their own people to destruction by violently oppressing and destroying the German resistance against this genocide, then they can no longer be servants of Satan. Not possible!

There will always be some who are completely without influence, because they need the masses of the deceived, of good faith, the well-meaning ones of our people. Those from the “Antifa” [*anti- fascists] , the simple ones who really mean to stand for the good, they are actually people like us. They are just wounded in the head by the enemy’s warfare. And what do our people do with the wounded? We take care of them! The “good people” on the side of the Antifa are not our enemy. Of course, if they attack us, we defend ourselves. But we know they are wounded in a spiritual war, and we must and can cure them. To heal them is to make clear to them who they are “supposedly” protecting, and who the Jews are in reality.

And here we begin now, not with “resistance” but with “attack.” We attack the Jews with their spiritual substance that they are Satan. But when we deny the Holocaust, they say:

“These are pseudo-scientists, and it’s all proven a hundred fold. Those who do not want to have this true are malicious, etc.”

They can always twist things with their propaganda and convince the majority of our people that the Holocaust deniers are very bad, immoral rogues who belong in prison.

We say:

“You are Satan. It’s written here by Moses, who gives orders to kill the peoples.”

The German sociologist, Alfred Weber, used the term, “to annihilate them”.

We point to the Talmud where it says to rob Gentiles, where it demands to harm non-Jews wherever they can, and if they do not, they commit a great sin.

We point to the Talmud where it says that in regard to the non-Jew they must commit perjury in court, and it’s forbidden to speak the truth. And if it is discovered that they committed perjury, then they must come up with a trick.

When we get this into the consciousness of these young people, then I’d like to see their reaction. Even if they initially repel it and say that’s hate against Jews, it remains. For we say:

“Read! This is in the Old Testament by Moses. It’s said by Isaiah. It’s in the Talmud. And read what the Talmud means for the Jews.”

“You do not know all this. You are uneducated. It is your duty to your people to educate yourself, to recognize with whom we are dealing.”

Then I’m sure it will not take long for these “good people” to really become good people again. This is our strength and everyone can start. We must finally free ourselves from the idea that only by a mass movement with a party of majority in the Bundestag can things be changed. Or, it is so futile one would rather leave it well alone. These are today’s conceptions in our ranks.

No! A very small handful of people who are determined can develop this substance into a scandal, exposing the Jew as Satan, as the “No to Life”. An imaginative “guerrilla tactic” can be used, like the pattern of “fun guerrilla flash mob” — one sets a time, shows up suddenly, and does something that the public notices. And then they’ll notice and say, “Ah that’s what they are doing, and it’s written in the Bible, and it is true.” — Then they‟ll look into the Bible. And when we quote the Talmud, maybe they’ll ask their teachers — and then the teachers have a problem because they must then deal with it. A Jewish publisher issued the Talmud now in German. It’s no wonder that certain parts of the text are missing in the translation, but very crucial words that I quote here are still present. And so they must admit:

“Yes, this is all true. It is not pseudoscience nor agitation, but these are the sacred texts of the Jews.”

Haven’t we been molded right from the beginning, already in nursery school, not to accept those children as play mates who do not live up to our ethical standards? Don’t we agree that those adults who violate these standards repeatedly be thrown in jail? And should we give the Jews, who are operating on the lowest level one can even think of, namely as murderers, genociders, robbers, etc. the same respect?

“Equality” brought us into this position. This was the warning of the German philosopher, Fichte:

“And even if they [*the Jews] appoint themselves ten times for human rights, do not believe them. And if now you also grant them equal rights, they‟ll crush you under their boots.”

This is exactly what happened. They have been emancipated. They have been given the same rights, and thus they have acquired the power of money and with this have power over men. For who is not dependent on money today? On credit? And there are everywhere the Jewish bankers who play the game, and who now decide whether a man can keep a job or not as locomotive engineer. Whether one still participates in the allocation of purchasing power that keeps people alive. All better toe the line and see the Holocaust as fact. They better not say anything critical against the Jews. Then they can continue to be locomotive engineers. Woe if not! Then they‟ll end up on Welfare. And this is supposedly an act of mercy to keep them alive.

This consciousness about our enemy is what guarantees us victory because everything that’s possible or impossible in politics today, namely National Socialist concepts: removal of usury, nationalization of banks, abolition of private credit against interest, all this cannot be publicly debated today without at once accused of anti-Semitism and thus losing one’s social livelihood. All this is possible only because we accept the Jews as a moral authority and as the poor victims of history — with this halo. When this is gone, then we‟ll talk about everything. And when a Jew comes and says:

“You must not say this because it is anti-Jewish hate.”

Then we’ll shut his mouth! Real simple! No one will throw himself at his feet any longer. We’ll then tell him:

“We know your program.”

And this is also in the Old Testament in Isaiah:

“Those who do not want to serve you, those kings who do not want to serve you, they are to die. And they will lick the dust from your feet.”

“And because you were hated…”

— Imagine this! The prophet Isaiah says to the Jews that they have been hated — How, I ask, is it possible that the elect people of Yahweh are hated? — How can I imagine this? But it’s written in there.

“And because you were the hated ones, I will compensate you over and over again; you shall receive ALL the riches of the world. And for the non-Jews there will be nothing left.”

And so in the mid-nineteenth century the first Jewish world organization — that still exists today — is founded with the program of getting all the riches of the world into Jewish possession. To destroy all religions, except the Jewish religion. For the Jews to destroy all empires is the founding manifesto of the Jewish World Alliance, the Alliance Israélite Universelle. And we are not aware of this. We consider them to be humans like us, who are decent, essentially moral, have the capacity to curb people who do not meet these standards, to render them harmless, to throw them into prison, to re-write their mental program, and whatever. But a whole nation that acts criminally, and that even with a good conscience because they believe that their God has assigned them to this, is a deadly danger. And we have to defend ourselves accordingly.

Then this is really war. Then we will defend ourselves and do what is necessary. We’ll do this first step, so that we can again speak about our interests as we want, as we think it is right; about National Socialism as the option to come out of this crisis. To achieve this, we must absolutely morally discredit the Jews by giving them an earful of their sacred writings. That’s all. And so we have started.

https: //archive.org/details/FlyerLuther

https: //archive.org/details/FlyerLutherFalt

There are now already two flyers — it’s the Martin Luther Year — Luther, who is demonized as anti- Semite has great significance. It is largely unknown that Luther was a defender of Jewry. In his time, there was a campaign by the Dominican Order to ban and burn this satanic rubbish, the Talmud. But Luther stood up and defended the Jews so they may keep the Talmud. And he was successful. And this prompted the primary Jewish historian, Heinrich Grätz, to write in his fundamental historical work “The Jewry,” (“Die Judenheit”):

“What Luther once expressed on empathy and sympathy for the Jews, the Jews had not heard for thousands of years.”

But then Luther publishes his work, “Von den Juden und Ihren Lügen” (“Of the Jews and Their Lies”) And here one must know how Luther came to this development. He simply had a lecture on Hebrew, learned Hebrew and then read the Talmud. And then it was as if scales fell from his eyes, and so he said:

“This is the devil.”

And this is why he has fought against the Jews. Completely justified. And what he proposes sounds terrible, to burn the synagogues, and this and that. But it is harmless, possibly child’s play, compared to what Moses demands in dealing with non-Jews. There, a bloody slaughter is demanded. With Luther, you will try in vain to find a call for murder in any way. Or any physical attacks. He only says:

“We do not want them among us. We must drive them out. We must burn their synagogues.”

Now, then! The houses of the devil should be burned. They have no place here.

The bottom line of the cult of Satan is an attack against all mankind. And against this attack, one must defend. And we have the right to defend ourselves. Here we do not ask the Jews whether we can do this. And if they’re still trying to throw people into jail, it’s getting harder.

Of course, I have received legal charges for what I said about the Talmud and the Old Testament. They have made three charges against me. The oldest is nearly three years on the table of the Court Chairman in Potsdam, and he has not even decided to open the proceedings. This delay is a criminal offense. The court must promptly decide whether the procedure is to be carried out or not. No, they do not decide. Then came the second charge. This is now 1.5 years back. The prosecuting attorney takes action. The department manager does not. The official in charge signs it, and then the judge gets it on the table and does nothing. And when my book was published, “Das Ende der Wanderschaft” (“The End of the Wandering”), and my case was then again moved back into closed enforcement, then the prosecuting attorney slapped a charge together without any enthusiasm. Now he always does the same routine. And then the first Court Chairman who was involved, he departed from these chambers at the turn of the year, when the courts were issued a new business plan, and is doing something else now.

And then we have here our friend, Hafenmayer. He has started a massive action 1.5 years ago with an Open Letter and sent it to 35,000 addresses where he portrays the Holocaust as the greatest lie in world history and a weapon of Jewry for the destruction of the German people. He sent this Open Letter to all kinds of Public Prosecutors, to all sorts of Courts, the Police Authorities, Constitutional Protection Offices, and also to private citizens. Then they have “dutifully” initiated an investigation process against him. They took his computer. But now there is silence. For 1.5 years nothing is happening. Although the case could have been ready for a charge the next day. He did not deny that he sent these documents. He stepped in front of the camera and read that, all publicly, and they are doing nothing. They are absolutely insecure, and there are quite clearly tendencies, that within the judiciary there is resistance to continue this Holocaust prosecution. And I also believe that the general development in Germany is also noticed by people who do not pay much attention, namely that the Federal Republic is probably not going to be around that much longer.

The judiciary sees that the EU is crashing and the Statute of Limitation on their actions has not lapsed. Then they have to reckon with legal proceedings for perversion of justice and other activities, and so they do not want to have anything to do with this anymore. So they just ignore it. But this is again a criminal offense. Both are a criminal offence: to pursue a deemed innocent person and not to pursue a deemed guilty person.

Regarding my book, there really is nothing to it. I am not speaking hate against the Jews, but I say only what is fact. So this is persecution of the innocent. Or if they are convinced it is hate speech, then they commit the crime of foiling prosecution, even if they delay prosecution only a few days.

Sylvia Stolz has received a judgement of 3.5 years imprisonment for allegedly delaying the proceedings by filing applications for bringing inadmissible evidence and for inadmissible rejection requests. This is how it’s written. This is called aiding and abetting. Only a few days delay! You all know here in Mannheim how things went with the Zündel legal process. It was interrupted a few times but only for a few weeks, and then it was continued. And this delay, for which they lay the blame on Sylvia Stolz, has led to a condemnation of aiding and abetting. You have to be clear about this! And then they let the charges now sit untouched into the third year. What is this? This is uncertainty, and we must finally comprehend our strength. And we add to this today:

“You have been working for the Jews the whole time, oppressed the Germans, and look who the Jews are, and what you have done!”

Because the people do not know this! But if you bring them the knowledge, then they have a real problem. And so I say, we are now called.

Now we are starting, and even if it’s only three of us. There are now three of us, who have taken the first step with 2 leaflets and a large mailing campaign. And there will be more, and it will be a network. No party, no club, they can forbid, but only a network within the Internet that has an internet address, and then we send out very specific content, and build an email list, so that more and more people become familiar with this material. Only a few will read it. This is how people are. But some will read it and talk about it, and then there will be more who will look into things. This needs to become a scandal so that all people will talk about it. And here is a very important point: If you tell an individual:

“Look, you’re supporting the Jews. They are robbers and commit genocide, and how can you have this on your conscience?” he’ll evade it.

But if he knows that his neighbor also knows that he knows, then he must somehow justify himself. He’ll no longer be the venerable, respectable professor but simply a cowardly bastard who delivers the German people to the knife because he is too spineless, or because he does not want to endanger his deplorable Judas wages. Similar to a child molester, he commits the worst crimes. For whoever knows and is silent is a criminal. Here you have to stand up. It is an obligation to expose murder plans and to report them. Whoever does not do this will be punished as accomplice. We have to give the people such an earful, that no one can step aside and say, “I did not know.” No, he knew it. And if he knew it and did not act, then he is a morally inferior subject.

Then there is a second important point. It is pointless to distribute these flyers only to completely unknown people who happen to pass you on the street. They have to be brought into specific activity centers. To a particular school. Into a certain business where people meet again and again and then talk about it. Some will be upset and others will say:

“Why are you getting upset? It’s true.”

And the third one will say:

“Well, let’s check it out!”

The teacher will have to say something to this. And so it starts. He scratches his head. He does not want to be called a liar in regard to the Old Testament. He must admit it before his pupils, and then he has to say how he sees it.

Then he’ll say:

“This was two thousand years ago!”

No! We have a whole box full of ammunition proving it is practiced to the present day. And well-known Jews say:

“The Talmud is our substance. We would not be Jews if we had not internalized the Talmud.”

And then you look at what is going on in the world. That’s all true. It is only necessary then to read the, “Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion”. This is the so-called modern transcription of the Talmud where it states:

“To bring all the riches of the world to oneself, and to commit the worst wickedness, but the gentiles must not notice it.”

“We will give them Democracy. This is necessary because then we are the ones who determine what happens. Then the masses determine everything, and the state leaders don’t understand anything any longer. And what the masses have to say, we tell them with our media.”

Isn’t this how it is? We can prove it completely. Then they won’t get out of the defensive any more. Then we have them in the sack. Then they can rattle off, up and down, “Auschwitz!” No one will take them seriously any longer. We will laugh at them!

There is an old legal principle. It comes from the Roman law and is called Tu-quoque, meaning “You too”. If someone comes to me and accuses me of theft, and therefore reproaches me somehow, and I know he has stolen himself, then I will not throw myself at his feet! I’ll say:

“What do you want from me? ! You have stolen yourself!”

And this is how we must approach the Jews. We can leave the debate of the Holocaust aside. We can say:

“Even if, it would be tiny compared to what you are responsible for, the wars you have instigated.”

This can all be proved. We got alone enough proof for WW1 and WW2. But there are far more wars that are on the account of the Jews.

The Jews, the Jewish capital, are behind the Turkish wars against Venice, against Europe. (Remark from the audience: “The 30-year war!”) Yes, and then it is just no longer unbelievable because it is simply the execution of the program given them in the Old Testament, to eradicate the peoples, to drive them out, not to assimilate with them, and to enslave them. And this is written in the Old Testament. In Moses, Isaiah and the other pals. And then we have the Talmud. And then they can’t say anything at all anymore. And this is the Esau blessing. It’s all done without force. But if they become violent, they must reckon with counter-violence. Then we really have open war. We have the better (not best) weapons because we have the truth on our side. In every respect. We just have to get started.

And now it’s important that everyone who feels a calling is compelled to link into this network and take the flyers to the peoples at those specific activity centers, as I said. This is an idea we had already at the beginning of the millennium. We said:

“A million flyers are waiting for the attack.”

This is the idea of the network. Everyone is called but can depart at any time. You belong by distributing flyers and paying for them as a contribution to the development of the project, and then reporting about it. This is the resistance to be achieved now. And everyone can participate. And the excuse that we do not now have the majority, that we have no success as a party among the “dumbed down Germans,” all this does not count. The German people have not become stupid! And for another, they are never stupid. The enemy applied very cunningly manipulations in our minds by warfare. We are really not on the right track when we add insult to injury with the influenced Germans because their thinking is askance around these issues, and they can’t figure things out. It’s up to us. We can change things. And since we can change things, we must do so. And so we have to get going.

We have two leaflets here, one is “Wir sind Luther” (“We are Luther”) and a few of the other “Ein Wort zur Erlösung der Judenheit und zur Rettung der Europäischen Völker” (“A Word for the Salvation of the Jews and Rescue of the European Peoples”). This one has not yet been distributed. But we have it. We are going to take advantage of the “Luther Year” to make these things known and start in the places that have special significance in the Luther Year. Eisenach, Wittenberg, and so on. And remember, a constant drip erodes the stone. We will hardly have an echo at first, but then it will come gradually. And the more we send this material to specific activity centers, the more assured we can be. It’s going to spread like wildfire. When a certain point is reached, then we are rid of this scum.

Really true. They have no material weapons. But they have only means to apply material weapons against us according to the principle of “The Brave Little Tailor”. But no one will participate any longer. And in America we have the first start in that people have noticed that they have been transported, by the media, into a Pseudo-world, a world of insanity. And then they ask:

“Well, who is the owner of the media?”

That’s the Jews! And why do they have this power position? Because they have the money. That’s the Jews! And then, suddenly, in the area of their supporters a process sets in where they will slink away, thinking:

“Hopefully no one has realized that I have helped them. I do not want anything to do with this now.”

This is the path where we get into a situation where we are talking again about National Socialism, the breaking of usury, the leadership state, the liquidation of democracy, which is necessary because it is the Jewish invention to oppress the peoples. When we can talk freely again, then we have the people with us. Because it is immediately obvious to them, when we can clearly and distinctly communicate that it is so and that there is no other possibility. And the German people have a special responsibility here. It embodies the kind of thinking that I briefly addressed and that we have to re-appropriate. There should be thinkers who seriously look into this and not just read in Wikipedia to see what they write about Hegel. No! Hegel must be read in the original. It is tedious. But damn it all! By Stalingrad things were also very difficult. We have to reach this level again where we make demands on ourselves, and then bite our teeth together and do something that isn’t fun. It is necessary. It’s war. We can win this war, and so we must win. All humanity is waiting for it. They are waiting for the German contribution to rescue them from the Jews.

[*Comment by translator]

Translated from German transcription into English by germanvictims.com

https: //aufstand-gegen-die-judenheit.com/

https: //endederluegedotblog.wordpress.com/2017/03/07/wir-sind-luther/ 

END

============================================

PDF Notes

* Total words = 8,689

* Total Images = 1

* Total pages = 31

Click to download a PDF of this post (0.7 MB):

Horst Mahler – We are Fighting to Win — TRANSCRIPT

________________

Version History

Version 2: Re-uploaded image and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version.

Version 1: Published post — Apr 26, 2017.

[In yet another interesting interview Jim Rizoli talks with a well-known figure in the Revisionist movement, Hadding Scott. We learn about Hadding’s earlier years and how he first learnt from his mother the old saying, “Don’t believe everything that you hear!”

Then, we learn how he became aware of some of the character traits of jews from listening to the Larry King radio show. Hadding recounts it was in 1992 that he became finally convinced that the “Holocaust” was a myth after listening to a Dr. Willian Pierce radio show.

Further on, the matter of the “revisionists” who have moved away from revisionism, like Irving, Weber, Cole and now Eric Hunt, is discussed.

— KATANA]

_______________________

YouTube Description

Jim Rizoli interviews Hadding Scott, Feb 2017, discussing Hadding’s ‘awakening’ concerning revisionism of Iraq and then, of course, WWII.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_553gsl07TQ&feature=youtu.be

[No longer available on Youtube]

UPDATE: Jul 2, 2022 – BitChute Video available here:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rQwBYc2s8vHJ/

Jim Rizoli

Interviews

Hadding Scott

TRANSCRIPT

(47:40)

[00:00]

Jim: Hi everyone, Jim Rizoli here. And I have another special guest for the show today, it’s Hadding Scott. And we’re going to be discussing a little bit about his life and some of the things that he’s been doing. So let’s get started.

So Hadding again, welcome to the program.

Hadding: Well, hello!

Jim: First of all, the only, really thing I know about you is just in e-mails, I see coming here and there. And the biggest thing I know about you, I should say is, because my brother Joe. He was very much involved listening to your discussion about Henry Ford with Carolyn Yeager.

Hadding: Oh yeah, “The International Jew Study Hour”.

Jim: Right, right! So, maybe you can tell us a little bit, … I’ll tell you what, before we get into that, why don’t we, you know, find out a little bit about you. So, what would you consider yourself?

Hadding: Well, I really hate to see somebody prevail through lying! This is something that you could notice in various things that I’ve done. But, you know, I really came to “Holocaust” revisionism through other things.

Jim: Yup.

Hadding: My origin has a lot to do with, … My parents were about a generation older than people my age. I just born in the ninety sixties. My parents were born in the nineteen twenties. And my mother was raised by her grandparents who were born not very long aft the War Between the States. So I got a very old perspective from my mother. And my mother always used to say, “Don’t believe everything that you hear!” And she gave me another perspective, when I brought home what I learned about Abraham Lincoln in school. And she also told me that all the stories about the cruelty of slavery in the South were not true. That this was exaggeration. And that slaves generally, were treated very well. And that the war was not about slavery, right?

So this really is a nice analogy to Holocaust revisionist. And I grew up with that.

Jim: Are you a teacher or anything like that? Are you an academic person?

Hadding: I have been a teacher.

Jim: OK.

Hadding: Not presently.

Jim: OK. Well, basically you, you know, you’re like me. I mean, I, you know, I got into this, because I didn’t like lying! [laughing] So, you know, I didn’t like people saying things that were just completely absurd and they’re lying and I’m trying to figure out what, why are they saying this if it’s not true? So I could understand that. So what were the first things that you took up within your travel through life, here? What were some of the topics? I mean, you mentioned Abraham Lincoln. But I mean, what other things did you do?

Hadding: Well, I can tell you how I arrived at Holocaust revisionist, all right? From this dissident perspective that was inherent in my parentage and my upbringing, I was already accustomed to the idea that much of what we hear in mass media is not true. I grew up with that! Right? But I had other things still that I needed to learn. I needed to learn that there was lying also about the Second World War, because my parents didn’t really have any inkling of that. My mother was very well informed about how there was lying against the South, but not about lying against Germany. But it was not a big leap to think that there might have been lying against Germany. But a lot of this depends on what you think about the character of the jews. Right?

I grew up with this idea that the jews were pretty much like everybody else, except they had a different religion, and the [???] jews were victimized by some mass psychosis that swept over Germany. And you have to learn about the jews to understand that this is not really how it was. And the way that I became acquainted with the real character of the jews was by listening to the Larry King Radio Show on the Mutual Broadcasting Network, beginning around 1978 and into the early 1980s.

[05:01]

I used to, actually I dropped out of high school at a very early age, actually. I got away with that. And I would stay up all night listening to Larry King radio show. And this was a big eye opener for me, because Larry King from my perspective was insane! [Jim laughing]

This was a man who professed to believe in racial equality, whereas I as a Southerner, knew first hand that this was clearly not true! And I noticed other things about Larry King. Well for one thing he made no secret of being a jew. He talked about it often and he would have guests on his show all the time the he identified as jews and many of them were buddies from the old neighborhood in Brooklyn. You could learn from listening to the Larry King Show the character of New York City jews and the fact that jews were very prevalent in the mass media and had no shame about using their positions in mass media to promote specifically jewish interests.

And Larry King was also extremely unfair to callers that disagreed with him on these particular issues, like race, and, … Well, especially race. If you disagreed with racial equality, he was very likely to badger you until you became incoherent and then hang up on you and then play the Looney Tunes thing. Right? [Mimicking the Looney Tunes music]

This was extremely unfair and this was really how I learned about jews. I mean, it’s sort of like seeing the platonic form of something, you know, you see the platonic form and then you see how that form exists in it’s imperfect form and the others. So, Larry King was sort of “concentrated jew”. And I saw that there was a little bit of Larry King in a lot of jews!

Jim: Did you ever call into the show?

Hadding: I did a couple of times.

Jim: And what happened?

Hadding: It was a long time ago, … I managed to get some stuff out and got hung up on.

Jim: [Laughing] Yeah! So that was your bad introduction to jews. And he’s such a wack job anyway, that guy!

Hadding: The thing about Larry King is he’s completely different on television, compared to how he was on the radio.

Jim: Really?

Hadding: On television he’s very toned down. You don’t, you don’t get the shameless promotion of jewish interests on his television shows, that he used to do on the radio.

Jim: Did he ever talk about the “Holocaust” or anything like [it]?

Hadding: I’m sure that he had Simon Wiesenthal on there and Eli Weasel. But at that point I wasn’t really suspicious about the Holocaust. I believed in the Holocaust until the late nineteen eighties. I started to have some questions about it in the late nineteen eighties. All right? Before I started to question the Holocaust. I had become interested in psychology. And I read a lot of psychology books, and one of the books I read was by a Scottish psychiatrist named R. D. Laing. And R. D. Laing labeled and demonized, obviously Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists.

So, because of R. D. Laing I was open to the idea that Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists might have their own story. That what they did does not seem crazy, right? What they supposedly did, right?

So, before I arrived at questioning the Holocaust, I arrived at the position of trying to understand why this happened. What did the jews do to bring this on them? Right? That seemed to me a logical question. Now, I did know from having been exposed to Larry King and also some other experiences with jews, that it was entirely possible that there was exaggeration and distortion. But I still believed the “Holocaust” must have had at least some truth in it.

It was not until about 1992 that I was convinced that the Holocaust was false. I had started listening to short wave and the alternative media on short wave. Like Radio Free America with Tom Valentine, and I stumbled across also the American Dissident Voices radio program, which was usually Kevin Strong. But once a month Dr Pierce would make a broadcast. And I wrote to them because I was very interested in the fact that the way Dr Pierce talked about racial problems was very similar to the way that I talked about these things. And he presented a rational discussion of these things.

[10:16]

And I was certainly already open to the, … I knew from listening to Larry King that jews had a lot to do with these problems. That jews in the media push for racial equality! And I ordered books and magazines from them, and one of the magazines that I ordered was an issue of National Vanguard magazine from 1989. It had Adolf Hitler on the cover, it was the one hundredth birthday of Adolf Hitler issue of National Vanguard magazine. And that magazine had an article in it called, “The Evidence of the Prussian Blue”. I had heard and read before that before the Zundel Trial. I heard Ernst Zundel interviewed on Radio Free America with Tom Valentine.

I had read an article by Professor Robert Faurisson that somebody that reproduced. But, I wasn’t sure about how much of what they said I should believe! I didn’t know who Robert Faurisson was. He could have been a crazy man, for all I knew. He said that there was no chemical residue in the gas chambers and there should have been chemical residue in the gas chambers. Well, that’s a valid argument, but, it seems to be a valid argument, but I don’t know who is Robert Faurisson, what is his expertise? How can I be sure that there really should have been residue there. He just says that there should have been. How do I know it?

But with Dr Pierce, when I read it from him, I believed him, because he had a lot of credibility with me, because he spoke my language. I mean, in terms of how he talked about race and racial issues. And he also was a physicist, you know, he would know things like whether there should be cyanide residue in the bricks. You couldn’t fool him on these things and I knew he was a man who consistently told the truth. Therefore, when I read this very concise presentation about the Leuchter Report, from Dr Pierce, I was convinced. And he presented it very concisely. He talked about the blue staining in the bricks which was in the delousing chamber at Birkenau but not in Krema one in Auschwitz [I] nor in any other Krema’s [crematoria]. And this convinced me!

Jim: So that was a good awakening for you, to see that. Now how did you pursue it after that?

Hadding: I didn’t do very much was Holocaust revisionism after that until about 2002, 2003. During the propaganda for, war against Iraq. Because it was very clear at that time that Hitler comparisons and the invocation of the “Holocaust” played a very large role in this anti-Saddam Hussein propaganda. Saddam Hussein was supposed to have gassed the Kurdish, the Kurds, he’s supposed of gassed Kurds, Kurdish civilians, for no reason! It was just an unprovoked gassing of these poor Kurdish civilians! That Saddam Hussein was supposed to have done for no reason. And this was supposed to make Saddam Hussein like Hitler. And he wanted to conquer the whole world like Hitler, right? So they were all these comparisons of Saddam Hussein legend, which I knew to be false by that point about Adolf Hitler.

And I wrote some articles, in early 2003, before the US invasion, in which I debunked the propaganda about Saddam Hussein. It was not true that Saddam Hussein had gassed any Kurdish civilians! This was a story that originally had been put out by the Iranians. Because what happened was that the Iranians were attacking this town in northern Iraq called Fallujah and there was nobody in the town. But then some Kurdish rebels went into Fallujah and the Iranians thought they were Iraqi soldiers and shelled them with cyanide canisters. And the Iranians accidentally killed these Kurds in Fallujah. What happened aft the Iranians went Fallujah and saw the dead Kurds is that they blamed it on the Iraqis. And they called in journalists to see what happened there and they said, “Look what the Iraqis did!”

[14:48]

If you read the early reports about this incident you can tell that they’re somewhat skeptical. The reports are somewhat skeptical what the Iranians say. The Iranians said there were five thousand dead Kurds killed by the Iraqis. The reporters said that they saw one hundred or so, bodies. This is the kind of initial reporting on Fallujah. But what happened after, Iraq came out of the war much stronger, as a sort of a regional superpower. jews started in with their anti-Saddam Hussein propaganda. It happened on September first, 1988.

There was an article, a news article and also an editorial by William Safire in the New York Times. In which William Safire mentions that this cyanide gas had been used to kill the Kurds at Fallujah was the same gas used at Auschwitz! George Herbert Walker Bush also made an explicit Hitler comparison. Compared Saddam Hussein to Hitler. And Saddam Hussein also returned the comparison, comparing George Herbert Walker Bush to Hitler! Everybody that you want to motivate people to attack apparently is just like Hitler.

So we have this war in 1991, but I’m perfectly willing to believe the Iraqi side of the story that April Glaspie, that the Kuwaitis provoked the Iraqis and that April Glaspie told them that the USA wouldn’t care if they invaded Iraq.

Also I found out the CIA had made a fake satellite photograph showing Iraqi tanks on the Saudi border to try to get the Saudis to support the whole project of invading Iraq, attacking Iraq. Which echoes, of course, the fake CIA photograph that was published in Life magazine of the fake aerial photograph of Auschwitz that was published in Life magazine, I think in 1977. That showed doctored photographs of Auschwitz with people lined up for the gas chamber.

Jim: I’d like to see that picture.

Hadding: Yeah! Well that’s online. You just do a search, “Life magazine Auschwitz”. You’ll find it. Actually, it had people standing on the corner of buildings in these lines that were lined up, to go into the gas chamber. It was a kind of sloppy alteration. And they also put in a wall to hide people, so that they could pretend these people going to be gassed were not seen by people outside of the camp. There was there was no such wall.

Jim: Right.

Hadding: Anyway, so this anti-Saddam Hussein propaganda about the gassed Kurds went on for fifteen years, until we had the invasion and overthrow of the Iraqi government in 2003. Really the gassed Kurds story was the basis of the whole propaganda. Because this is an observation that I’ve made about how propaganda works. Most people are so overwhelmed with information that they can’t bother to check everything that they hear, or even very much of what they hear.

So what people will do, is that they will take a few bits of information that they’ve heard and that they believe and they’ll construct a picture based on assumptions. So basically they try to see a pattern and fill out a picture based on that. In Gestalt psychology this is called “reifications” where you have a few, a few hints about what a shape might be and you can imagine that the shape is there. That’s called “reification”. It literally means “making the thing”, “thing making”.

So this tendency of people to fill out their knowledge gaps with imagination is exploited in propaganda. And the biggest way that they do this, is by misinforming people about somebody’s character. Once it was spread that Saddam Hussein had gassed the poor Kurds and had done it with no cause, people would believe that he could do anything! All right, this is a crazy man! A man who might very well have been involved in the 9/11 attacks!

You couldn’t really convince people that he wasn’t involved in the 9/11 attacks, because that would that would require checking the evidence and most people will never do that. But it would fit, … If people implied that he might have been involved in the 9/11 attacks they were very ready to believe it, because of what they had been told about Saddam Hussein’s character. And this is something that has to be addressed is also in regard to the Holocaust.

One thing that a lot of people in Revisionism seem to do, they seem to focus on these details about gas chambers and crematoria and they don’t really look at questions like, “What kinds of people were these that were accused of doing these things?” “What is the character of the people making the accusations?” That’s extremely important!

[20:12]

Now, since 9/11 and actually since the late 1970s when people started becoming critical of the state of Israel, but especially since 9/11, there’s a lot less trust of jews, because a lot of people noticed after 9/11 that there was a lot of dishonesty.

I just had a conversation yesterday with a leftist. I asked him privately if you believed in the Holocaust. And he said he wasn’t sure, but he doesn’t trust jews. This guy’s a leftist! He says he doesn’t trust jews! Right? Because he doesn’t trust jews, he’s open to the possibility that the whole cause could be a big lie. Right? That’s very important! And this is something that has to be addressed if you’re trying to say that there was no Holocaust, while maintaining, “Oh yes! The Nazis were these horrible people!” you’re not going to be very convincing.

Jim: The big thing for you to understand how a lie could be propagated upon us and not be true, and I understand that too, … And I do I do believe you, what you say there about this psychology of this all too. There’s a lot more involved than that. That a lot of people don’t get into. I mean, I don’t get into it, because it’s hard, it’s hard to deal with that aspect of it, unless you show pictures [laughing] ., you know, what I mean?

I mean, you know, people, you could talk psychology all you wanted but it seems like it only resonates with a certain type of people, the psychology aspect of it. I mean, I think it’s a good aspect of it. Just like, what’s her name, Elizabeth Loftus. Is that her name? She’s the one that talks about the false memory syndrome. Have you ever hear of her?

Hadding: Yeah.

Jim: So I mean, she was saying, …

Hadding: I’ve heard of False Memory Syndrome.

Jim: Yeah. Well anyway, that’s, I think that’s who she is. And she’s the one that, you know, she went at it from that aspect. But she didn’t get into the “Holocaust”. She just gets into it from other people in life, but being a jew, she didn’t want to deal with that topic of the Holocaust, because obviously, you know, the tribes she belongs to, the tribe and that’s not going to be too good for her. So that’s why she never, … But that is an interesting topic if you ever wanted to find out about her. I think it’s Elizabeth Loftus.

Hadding: Well I’ll tell you another psychologist who wrote something that casts a lot of doubt on the Holocaust is Leon Festinger. He wrote “A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance”. This was published in 1957. And you really have to wonder what Festinger had in mind.

It’s irresistible to make the analogy, jews hearing the rumors in Auschwitz, or someplace like that. If they were, … If they had a bad conscience, if they really hated the Germans, if they were communists and had bad intentions and had been locked up in this camp. But were being treated way better than they expected, or way better than seem justified. They would be disposed to believe the same kind of rumors that these Japanese interned in these American camps believed. They had this rumor that they were being secretly killed and it was the same rumors that the jews had.

Jim: Can I ask you this about your relationship with Carolyn Yeager doing that real, you know, I guess it want on for what, months? Your thing about Henry Ford.

Hadding: Yeah, it was some 50 chapters.

Jim: Wow! So how long did that go on for?

Hadding: It was about a year, I guess.

Jim: Yeah, my brother, … I mean, the reason I know about that, is my brother Joe, he takes the mp3s and he listens to them when he drive. So he told me all about it and, you know, it’s a great way of understanding, or actually getting the book in without reading it, you know. Because sometimes people, they can’t read. My brother he, … And I do too. When I get on the plane I take mp3s and listen to them as I fly. You know, right now I’m listening to “The Myth of German Villainy”. Are you familiar with that book?

Hadding: No. Who wrote that?

Jim: Oh my goodness! Ben Bradberry. You have to get that book! If you want to understand World War Two, and prior to World War Two, World War One, and even prior to that from the 1850s on, what happened with Germany and the whole ten yards, you have to, … You have to read that book. Because you’ll get the best education on what really happened. And I think of all the books I’ve ever read, that probably has been the best one.

[25:14]

I interviewed him actually, Ben Bradberry. You could probably do a search for it on You Tube “Ben Bradberry Jim Rizoli interview” But he’s been he’s been interviewed by Red Ice and Rense and all these other people, too. So he’s a phenomenal writer and the book, … I don’t even know how he wrote his book. There’s so much in this book. It’s like how does anybody get into so much information and put it into a book? I just can’t even comprehend it. But he did it.

So, yeah, if you ever get a chance definitely read that. I actually have it all online as a mp3 that I downloaded on the site, the archive site [https://archive.org/details/MRTAPMAN_gmail_MGV] that people can download it and listen to it, like I’m listening to it. But it’s like, how many hours, my goodness, I think it’s fourteen hours just audio. So it’s pretty long. But, I do recommend that.

But anyway, getting back to Carol Yeager. Have you done any more stuff with her, or what?

Hadding: She’s not doing very much these days, so she just posts articles on our blog, occasionally. She has this website called, January 27 [http: //jan27.org], you know, the “Holocaust” Revisionist Commemoration on International “Holocaust” Remembrance Day. I just wrote an essay for that.

Jim: Yeah, I saw that. It’s not Jan27.org is it? Is that it? Oh, that’s her site, then OK, all right

Hadding: “jan27.org”

Jim: Right. That’s a real good site there. So she basically, she hasn’t been doing much with, you know, online interviews and stuff anymore?

Hadding: I haven’t heard her do an interview in months.

Jim: Oh, OK. I mean, I know I was on her show some years ago. But I haven’t really heard much about her since, you know.

What do you think about, … Here’s something that we’ve been discussing here, Diane and I. We’ve been discussing what’s happening in the revisionist movement. A lot of people, well not a lot, but some pretty high ranking people in the movement are kind of recanting! They have [moved??] now. Like for instance Eric Hunt. You know, what do you think about what’s going on there?

Hadding: Well, Eric Hunt, I don’t know if it’s really “high ranking”. He’s got notoriety because he makes videos in which, I mean, he’s prominent, because he makes videos, …

Jim: Right.

Hadding: I think mostly, … Honestly I don’t pay a lot of attention to what other people do, but I’m sure mostly in his videos he summarizes other people’s findings.

Jim: Right.

Hadding: With Cole, he had an argument, …

Jim: Oh! David Cole, yeah, yeah, …

Hadding: And apparently he felt badly about his performance in the argument with Cole. And he felt he had been defeated, I guess. He said, “We really need to prove that those jews weren’t killed in the Action Reinhardt Camps!” Well, wait a second. The burden of proof is on the accuser, you know. That’s one of the reasons why I wrote this essay called, “Semi-revisionism is Dead” [https://jan27.org/semi-revisionism-is-dead] .

Jim: Yeah, I read it and it was excellent. I thought it was very good, but I think, … You know what’s happening with this conversation, OK, what I’m noticing anyway, is these, … I call them the “Holocaust”-hucksters and what they do is they turn the conversation on us, to prove something that didn’t happen!

Hadding: To prove it didn’t happen!

Jim: I mean, it’s like, how do you do that!? How do I prove something didn’t happen!? And their biggest thing is [laughing] if you ever get in the conversation is, “Where did the jews go if they weren’t executed?” and I’m saying to myself, “Who cares? I don’t care where they went!” they weren’t killed, that’s all I care about, you know. So that’s my, you know, my take on that. But, you know, now he in his last article I just saw, he writes all about, you know, the Reinhardt Camps and that people were killed in those camps, because, you know, “Where did they go if they want were killed?” And the thing that really bothers me is they make all these assumptions that, you know, the jews had to go somewhere if they weren’t killed, but they forget all the other information showing how ridiculous the hoax is!

Hadding: That’s right.

Jim: I mean, I don’t get it! I don’t understand how this guy can even look at himself in the mirror and think, “Well gee! Let’s talk about those Reinhardt Camps and, you know, find out where they get all that wood?” You know, how they do all this, you know, those, … How they burnt all these bodies just with lighting a match to a body and the whole body just incinerates, you know, “puff” and the whole pile goes up [laughing] just, you know, just like that! Yeah, I don’t know. I just get so aggravated when I hear it.

[30:12]

But then, you know, I hear David Irving, he’s kind of capitulated not??? . Mark Weber, you know, he’s the same way, you know, he basically says, “While I think that millions of jews were killed, …” but he doesn’t get into how it happened. He just said it happened.

Hadding: I thought you humiliated Mark Weber by asking him, “How were they killed?” and he couldn’t answer that.

Jim: I mean, how do these guys show their face!? I mean, how do you, how do you make, … I mean, you know, I use a lot of IHR [Institute of Historical Review] material and, you know, the old stuff. And, you know, I’m always using it and then I talk to a guy that can’t even give me two facts that show that it happened! And that, you know, David Cole is the same way, you know. So yeah you got David Irving, David Cole and obviously, you know, Mark Webber and now we get Eric Hunt. You know, who’s next? You know, that goes, …

Hadding: Irving, Weber and Cole all have different motives. David Irving, he wants to have his career back, right. I don’t think he’s going to get it, but that seems to be, … I mean, that’s what somebody opined, somebody very well informed and prominent and famous, opined to me in 1996 when the “Goebbels: Mastermind of the Third Reich” came out. David Irving wants his career back.

So that is why David Irving is espousing this semi-revisionism the continues the demonization of Goring and Goebbels and Himmler, .. But not Goring, but Himmler and Goebbels. But it’s really a reversion to the position that he had in the 1970s. That was always his position. That he constructed this drama where Hitler was doing good things and he had these evil men around him that were harming jews behind his back.

Jim: Right.

Hadding: But this is the kind of drama that David Irving has constructed. And really he’s just gone back to that. Mark Weber has a different motive, I think he just wants to avoid Holocaust revisionism and not discuss it to the extent that he can avoid it.

In the case of David Cole, … David Cole got involved in Holocaust revisionism only after the 1988 False News Trial when the Leuchter Report appeared and Leuchter testified and David Irving testified on behalf of Ernst Zundel. The holocaust industry was, in general, was in retreat at that point. And you could see this for example in Yehuda Bauer, his letter to The New York Times. An article about Yehuda Bauer to The New York Times followed by a letter from Yehuda Bauer, talking about the need to lower the death toll at Auschwitz, because those neo Nazi holocaust deniers, “They can count, you know!”

They realized that they were under a lot of scrutiny and criticism and that they needed to make revisions themselves to try to save their holy myth. And this is when David got involved! By his own account it was 1989 when he got involved. And the first time that the world heard anything about David Cole wasn’t until 1992. David Cole as a “Holocaust” revisionist.

By that time it was the period when Holocaust revisionism appeared to be this great chariot leading to victory, right? And, you know, that’s what David Irving clearly believed in 1988. He believed that revisionism would prevail within, he said, five to ten years. And then the history books could be rewritten. Well it didn’t turn out that way.

Jim: Right.

Hadding: But during that time David Cole got involved. He endorsed the findings to the Leuchter Report. And he made this video at Auschwitz, where he basically duplicated what other revisionists had already done. There’s really no new information, I don’t think, in Cole’s Auschwitz video. It is very well done, you know, it has a nice tempo to it and has good audio and it’s watchable. All right? But David Cole was basically just putting a jewish face on what others had already discovered.

Jim: Right.

Hadding: That’s what he was doing. It’s jewish damage control!

Jim: Right. I know Mark Weber, you know, I don’t know, maybe, you know, this, or not. I don’t know, but he inherited a lot of money, you know, in a settlement he got, you know, he actually inherited like, for the IHR.

Hadding: Carto.

Jim: Yeah and all that. He got several million dollars out of that. I mean, did, you know, that?

[35:12]

Hadding: Well, I knew that there was this woman, I think, left a lot of money to the IHR.

Jim: Yes, she was part, …

Hadding: ??? And Carto had embezzled it and, …

Jim: Yeah, there’s a whole story there. But the bottom line was, the end result, was he inherited seven, I think seven and a half million dollars that went to IHR and that’s the reason why you don’t hear Mark Weber saying anything anymore. Because he’s got so much money that he’s just sitting on it and just waiting to retire and live happily ever after. So, and he’s not doing anything! No new books, no new writings, nothing! Because he’s pretty well set for life, now. I mean, that’s what I get out.

Hadding: Well, from what I see apparently he’s perfectly happy to travel and give a speech against the Zionist jewish power!

Jim: Right.

Hadding: He’s apparently happy to talks about Palestinians, but he doesn’t want to talk about the “Holocaust”.

Jim: Right. Well, that’s the point, you know, why, because he’s still, he’s still reaping money. He’s getting money that’s coming in from people that still donate to his cause and, you know, he, like I said, he doesn’t want to upset the apple cart with the, you know, maybe some of the jews even contribute to his cause that want him to keep quiet, you know, what I mean? [laughing].

Hadding: Who knows?

Jim: So I think, oh yes, I think, you know, I think that’s part of the issue there with him. But that’s sad because, you know, Germar Rudolf, he wrote a really good article about that. About what happened with all that. I just read that, I think the other day, you know, the whole relationship about revisionism and how money corrupts. And it sure has, because it keeps revisionism from doing more. Because, you know, if they have a lot of money they don’t have to do anything. And Germar, I think Germar out of all the revisionists, he’s the one I think is the top one now, you know, that’s really doing something and, you know, trying to make this work. Germar. I mean, he’s, that’s my opinion anyway, you know. I don’t know any other one that’s that’s doing anything as much as Germar.

Hadding: Oh sure. Faurisson some years ago referred to the amazing energy of Germar Rudolf, or something to that effect.

Jim: Yes, it’s phenomenal what he’s doing. And, you know, we interviewed, we went down to Pennsylvania and interviewed Germar and he was really a good man. I really like him and I just hope he can, … I mean, what really bothers me is you get these inheritances that come in to these organizations and you think the IHR would throw some money his way, you know, because of all the work that Germar has done, you know. But no, he doesn’t get anything from anybody. You know, he’s just poking along. It’s just sad! I hate to see that happen but, you know, it’s happening, you know. Anyway, but that’s, …

Hadding: Well, I don’t think. I just want to clarify. I don’t think that receiving money is what’s wrong with Mark Weber, all right. Mark Weber, I mean, this is according to Faurisson’s account. Mark Weber is a weak man! He’s a weak man. He’s not very brave. When they were in, I think, in Germany and police had detained Ernst Zundel. They were going to have, … I don’t remember the story now, but they were in Germany and they are in danger of being arrested and Mark Weber’s teeth were chattering!

Jim: Right.

Hadding: But, you know, Mark Weber he’s not a, just look at him. He does not convey strength.

Jim: Yeah, he at that point that you are talking about, I’m going to use a term that, there’s no other way I could use it any differently, … He was ready to shit his pants! OK! Because [laughing] he was so afraid of getting arrested and that’s what happened with him. So yeah. But, you know, I look at Fred Luechter and, you know, hey Fred, you know, he took it. I mean, he, you know, he was going to go to jail too and he hung in there. He eventually got out of there which was the smartest thing to do too.

But if he goes back there, they’re going to put him in jail [laughing] So, you know, Fred hung in there and he’s, you know, he’s not going back on any of his views about how things were done in the, you know, the Luechter Report and all that. And he suffered more than anybody, you know. So, you know, when I see these people talking about suffering like Eric Hunt, you know, my whole life has been topsy turvy by this and that. I just say, please!

Hadding: So you think that’s why he’s backing away from this?

Jim: Well, that’s what I think. I think even Germar said that too. But you got to understand too with David Cole, you know, they threatened David Cole. They had a hit on him, to kill him. You know, he was supposed to, he was going to be killed.

[40:11]

Hadding: Yeah, it’s an interesting thing, they didn’t kill him, did they?

Jim: No, no, I know, yeah, because he talked to, what was his name?

Hadding: Irv, …

Jim: OK, OK. Irv Ruben, at the time anyway. He went to jail. He actually end up going to jail, but he actually end up talking to him and as far as I understand, the story what Cole said, he ended up paying him money or something, not to do anything to him. That’s the story that I heard. I thought I heard from Cole, when I was listening to one of Cole’s audios, videos, like we are doing now.

So, the point is it seems like a lot of these people might have been threatened, you know, I can understand that would cause a problem with you, but, you know, we’ve all suffered. I mean, I lost a business, because of the jews. So I mean, that’s life. You just get on and, you know, I know I didn’t stop. I actually got more, I got more involved with it. I didn’t get less involved in it, because now I have the time to put to it! You know, that’s that’s what I feel is important, you know, use your time wisely. And I think that’s what we all have to do you know.

Hadding: Well Irv Ruben has been dead for years now. I don’t think that Irv Ruben is the reason for what David Cole is doing now. I presented in my essay, “Semi-Revisionism is Dead” background that would support the interest that David Cole was never really interested in debunking the Holocaust, as such. That is never what he wanted to do. He tried, like Yehuda Bauer, he wanted to revise it to keep it alive.

Jim: Right.

Hadding: That’s my thesis.

Jim: Well, he got [???] too. After all that he ended up working for the “Holocaust” museum, or whatever. Somebody involved with that and he was doing videos for them. According to what David Cole says now. I’m telling you what David Cole said. After he went into hiding, he ended up doing stuff for the opposite cause, here. And doing videos and research for the pro-holocaust people.

Hadding: As Stein?

Jim: Yeah as Stein.

Hadding: OK.

Jim: Yeah, he changed his name. And then, you know, that’s what happened there. I mean, well, you know, what are you going to do? I really don’t care about him. I have no interest. I would like to interview him though and really hit him with, you know, some really tough questions, but I don’t know if that’s ever going to happen, you know. I’m not really worry about it.

So what, … Do you have like a website, do you like, have a blog site or anything like that?

Hadding: Yes, my main blog is The National Socialist Worldview. Its National hyphen Socialist hyphen Worldview dot blogspot dot com [http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com].

Jim: Oh OK. That’s good. So we can go to that and see what’s going on with you. Like you post things there all the time, or something, or keep it up?

Hadding: Yeah. I try to post at least one thing a week but, you know, sometimes it’s only one thing a month. If I get working on something for CODOH it might keep me from posting on my blog for a while.

Jim: Yeah. So explain to me a little bit about CODOH. So you do stuff with them and who is running CODOH now?

Hadding: Germar Rudolf!

Jim: OK. So Germar is running it and how’s that going?

Hadding: It’s a good gig., you know, I wasn’t really, … It pays a little less than the Occidental Observer, but the Occidental Observer won’t publish my stuff anymore. And I get published much more regularly on CODOH than I could on the Occidental Observer. I use this to pay my bills.

Jim: Right, right. Who runs the Occidental Observer?

Hadding: That’s Kevin MacDonald. MacDonald is afraid of, seems to be afraid of, that subject.

Jim: Well, you got to understand that if he takes that topic on he’s going to be dead, just like Irving!

Hadding: Well, he’s retired, so what does he have to lose?

Jim: Oh, is that what it is. OK, well I can understand that. So, well that’s good. So, I mean, I just started going to the CODOH site looking up more things. I mean, that’s a great site. I mean, a lot of information there, you know. We, you know, we’re revisionists, I mean, we have a tremendous amount of information out there, you know, the “Holocaust” handbooks. I mean, my goodness. I mean, there’s so much stuff there. The problem is the majority of people out there don’t get to see it because, you know, you can’t get it out there. I mean, you know, you have to look for it deep down in the Internet to find it. But it’s there if people, you know, want to look at it, you know. We can we can definitely look at it.

[44:51]

So, basically, you know, you’re just biding your time. Just, you know, writing things as they come. I mean again we, you know, we enjoy what you write. I mean, you know, you’re a good writer. You know, you have a nice, you know, style and insight. I would say about things and I think that’s important that people, you know, see that stuff. I mean, that article you wrote about, you know, the three revisionist, what was it, three revisionist you took up?

Hadding: Yes, “Semi-Revisionism is Dead” is the name of it.

Jim: Yes, that was a super article! That was a great article, you know. So anytime you get something, you know, a new, .. Well you send them my way anyway, so we get what you’re doing now. So that’s important.

Well, anything else you have you like to, … What do you think, what do you think the future is for us? You know, the movement, you know, revisionism, the truth movement and all that?

Hadding: I think that we have some people falling away from Holocaust revisionist right now that maybe hadn’t really thought through their position very well initially. Maybe their commitment wasn’t very deep to begin with. So I wouldn’t worry about that too much. I just worry about what I’m doing and trying to make sure what I’m doing the right thing. And keep doing it. And as long as I can get by and pay my bills and have enough to eat while I’m doing the right thing that is what I keep doing.

Jim: Right, right. Well, I agree. I’m the same way. You know, I was saying to Diane, I was saying I don’t, I really don’t care what anybody even the revisionist views are! I know common sense! You know, me I can read and I can understand common sense and if someone wants to go back on common sense and go to stupidity and believe things that just can’t happen I mean, that’s that’s up to them! I just feel sorry for them that they can’t stick it out and do what’s right.

But, well look, I really appreciate that you came on with us today. Again you contribute a lot to the cause! I just want to let, you know, that, OK!

Hadding: Thank you very much.

Jim: Yeah, I mean, you’re a good man and, you know, keep continuing on and don’t let anybody discourage you. I know financially, you know, things could be better, but it could be like that for all of us to, I suppose. But the truth is the truth! And no matter what the topic is you’ve got to let people know about it. I don’t care what the consequences are, you’ve got to just let everybody, you know, deal with it and go along with it, you know.

Well look, Hadding, thank you very much for our interview. Good luck with what you’re doing and, you know, another time we’ll probably try to talk to you again when something else comes up that, we know, we can talk about too.

Hadding: All right. Well, thank you very much.

Jim: All right. Bye now!

[47:40]

END

[Part 11]

[Benton Bradberry’s 2012 book, “The Myth of German Villainy” is a  superb, must-read, revisionist look at how the German people have been systematically, relentlessly and most importantly, unjustly vilified as the arch criminal of the 20th century. Bradberry sets out, cooly and calmly as befits a former US-Navy officer and pilot, to show why and how the German people have been falsely accused of massive crimes and that their chief  accuser and tormentor, organized jewry is in fact the real party guilty of monstrous crimes against Germans and the rest of the world.

In Part 11, the reaction from organized jewry to Hitler’s and his NSDAP’s rise to power is described. Organized jewry declares “war” on Germany and launch economic boycotts from 1933 onwards, based on the alleged persecution of jews.

Germany as a whole and its leadership in particular, is demonized and mocked throughout the world via the jewish dominated media:

“The Jews do not fight their wars with armies of armed men, at least, not armies of armed Jewish men. The Jews control the news media, as well as banking and finance throughout Europe and America, and they fight their wars with propaganda and with their control of capital. They organize boycotts to destroy businesses in their target country; they undermine the economy of the target country through financial manipulation and by cutting off lending which no economy can do without, and they mold and inflame world opinion with manufactured news and propaganda to turn public opinion completely against the target country. Through their control of politicians they manage to pit nations against each other, then use other people’s armies to fight their battles.“

In New York an anti-German rally in Madison Square Garden is held, drawing 40,000 people.

“It could be said that the March 24, 1933 Jewish declaration of war on Germany, followed by the International Jewish Boycott Conference of July, 1933, was the real beginning of World War Two.”

These actions helped to make the Germans more determined to break the jewish hold on German institutions and to encourage jews to emigrate —  KATANA.]

NOTE: The author has very generously given me permission to reproduce the material here — KATANA.

 The book can be bought at Amazon here: The Myth of German Villainy

The Myth of

German Villainy

by

Benton L. Bradberry

Contents

[Clicking on a link in the Contents here will take you to that Part, in a separate post]

[Part 01]

Preface

Chapter 1 – The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation

Germany’s Positive Image Changes Overnight

[Part 02]

Chapter 2 – Aftermath of the War in Germany

The Versailles Treaty

Effect of the Treaty on the German Economy

Was the War Guilt Clause Fair?

Did Germany Really Start the War?

[Part 03]

Chapter 3 – The Jewish Factor in the War

Jews at the Paris Peace Conference

Jews in Britain

[Part 04]

Chapter 4 – The Russian Revolution of 1917

Bolsheviks Take Control

Jews and the Russian Revolution

Origin of East European Jews

Reason for the Russian Pogroms Against the Jews

Jews Leave Russia for America

Financing the 1917 Revolution

Jews in the Government of Bolshevik Russia

[Part 05]

Chapter 5 – The Red Terror

Creation of the Gulag

Bolsheviks Kill the Czar

Jews as a Hostile Elite

The Ukrainian Famine (Holodomor)

[Part 06]

Chapter 6 – The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads Throughout Europe

Jews in the Hungarian Revolution

Miklos Horthy Saves Hungary

Jews in the German Revolution

The Spartacist Uprising in Berlin

Jewish Bolsheviks Attempt to Take Italy

Jewish Bolsheviks Attempt to Take Spain — The Spanish Civil War

Czechoslovakia in Danger of Communist Takeover

The Comintern’s Aim? World Domination!

[Part 07]

Chapter 7 – The Nation of Israel

History of the Expulsion of Jews

[Part 08]

Chapter 8 – Jews in Weimar Germany

Jews Undermine German Culture

[Part 09]

Chapter 9 – Hitler & National Socialists Rise to Power

The 25 Points of the National Socialist Party

[Part 10]

Chapter 10 – National Socialism vs. Communism

National Socialism

Jews Plan Marxist Utopia

[Part 11]

Chapter 11 – Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany

Text of Untermeyer’s Speech in New York

The Jewish Persecution Myth

Effect of Boycott on the German Economy

Jewish Exaggerations are Contradicted by Many

[Part 12]

Chapter 12 – The Nazis and the Zionists Actually Work Together for Jewish Emigration out of Germany

The Nuremberg Laws – 1935

The Zionist Movement

[Part 13]

Chapter 13 – Life in Germany Under Hitler

Night of the Long Knives

1934 Annual Nazi Rally at Nuremberg

Hitler Revives the German Economy

Hitler Becomes the Most Popular Leader in the World

[Part 14]

Chapter 14 – Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory

Chapter 15 – The 1936 Olympics

[Part 15]

Chapter 16 – “Anschluss”. The Unification of Austria and Germany

Austrian Economy Revived

Austria’s Jews

[Part 16]

Chapter 17 – Germany Annexes the Sudetenland

[Part 17]

Chapter 18 – War with Poland

The Polish Problem

Hitler’s Proposal to Poland

Kristallnacht

German-Polish Talks Continue

Jews Influence both Roosevelt and Churchill

British and American Political Leaders Under Jewish Influence

Roosevelt’s Contribution to Hostilities

Lord Halifax Beats the War Drums

Germany Occupies Bohemia and Moravia

Roosevelt Pushes for War

Anti-war Movement Becomes Active

Poles Murder German Nationals Within the Corridor

[Part 18]

Chapter 19 – The Phony War

Russo-Finnish War

The Norway/Denmark Campaign

German Invasion of Denmark and Norway

Churchill Takes Chamberlain’s Place as Prime Minister

[Part 19]

Chapter 20 – Germany invades France Through the Low Countries

The Phony War Ends.

Churchill the War Lover

The Fall of France

Hitler Makes Peace Offer to Britain

[Part 20]

Chapter 21 – The Allied Goal? Destruction of Germany!

[Part 21]

Chapter 22 – Germany as Victim

Rape and Slaughter

Jewish Vengeance

The Jewish Brigade

[Part 22]

Chapter 23 – Winners and Losers

Bibliography

Chapter 11

Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany

Hitler’s election as Chancellor in January, 1933 set off alarm bells throughout International Jewry because he threatened to end the predominating Jewish influence in German affairs.

The Jewish Diaspora, then as now, formed the world’s most powerful trading and political bloc. They control, and controlled then, the international press and therefore public opinion, and they control banking and finance, and therefore industry. They provide most of the money with which politicians get elected, and they therefore control the politicians, and by controlling the politicians, they control governments. Hitler’s election meant interruption of and interference with the world’s commercial and political system which World Jewry dominated. When Hitler and the National Socialists came to power in Germany, the Jews were in complete control of Russia; were very powerful in the United States, Britain and France; and they dominated virtually every institution in Germany. Jewish exclusion from the commercial and political life of Germany, as Hitler planned, meant a breach in the cohesion of the worldwide system which Jews controlled.

Adolf Hitler when he became Chancellor.

Moreover, Hitler stood alone in his defiance of the tidal-wave of Jewish organized Communism which threatened to sweep over Europe. Having seized control of Russia which they used as a base, Jewish Communists were behind all the civil unrest throughout the West, including Eastern Europe, Britain, France, Italy, the Spanish Civil War, and even in the United States. (Communism was introduced into the United States by the wave of East European Jewish immigrants that swarmed into this country at the turn of the twentieth century.) Germany alone repelled and held in check this tsunami of subversion and insurrection. Hitler’s election posed an immediate threat to International Jewish power, and they quickly organized economic warfare against Germany as a means of bringing the National socialist state to its knees.

Hitler had spoken out from the day he entered politics against Jewish control in Germany, and had won election in large part due to his promise to free Germany from the Jewish grip. He had made it clear that he intended to impose restrictions on Jewish power in Germany as soon as he was in position to do so. The Jews did not wait for him to begin acting against Jewish interests in Germany. International Jewry made a preemptory strike.

[Add. Image — Bernard Lecache (1895–1968) was a French journalist. In 1927, he founded the League Against Pogroms, which the following year, became the International League Against Anti-Semitism, and in 1979, became the International League against Racism and Anti-Semitism.]

Bernard Lecache, President of the Jewish World League declared at the time:

 

“Germany is our public enemy No. 1. It is our object to declare war without mercy against her.”

Hans Grimm, a distinguished German writer quoted a leading Jew in Australia, who said to a visiting German admiral:

 

“Herr Admiral, you have heard that President Hindenburg has assigned the office of Reich Chancellor to the National Socialist Hitler on the basis of the results of the last Reichstag election? Herr, Admiral. I here give you my word, think on it later. We Jews will do everything to erase this event from the world.”

The Jews were not about to tolerate this upstart Hitler without a fight, and fight, they were well prepared to do. It has been said that the pen is mightier than the sword and the Jews were masters of the pen and of the written word. The Jews do not fight their wars with armies of armed men, at least, not armies of armed Jewish men. The Jews control the news media, as well as banking and finance throughout Europe and America, and they fight their wars with propaganda and with their control of capital. They organize boycotts to destroy businesses in their target country; they undermine the economy of the target country through financial manipulation and by cutting off lending which no economy can do without, and they mold and inflame world opinion with manufactured news and propaganda to turn public opinion completely against the target country. Through their control of politicians they manage to pit nations against each other, then use other people’s armies to fight their battles. They then reap enormous profits off both sides of the conflict as war profiteers. (This is happening today, as the Israelis and their American fifth column, the Jewish neocons, use American military power to fight their wars in the Middle East.)

The Jews already had an effective anti-Nazi, anti-Hitler propaganda campaign underway, beginning with Hitler’s “25 Points” speech in 1921. This campaign intensified with the publication of Mein Kampf in 1925. When Hitler became Chancellor, the attacks went into hysteria mode.

Hitler in particular and all Nazi leaders in general immediately became targets of a relentless smear campaign. The Nazis were characterized in the Jewish press as uneducated, low-class, brutish upstarts with crude manners and no sophistication. No smear was too excessive to be used against them. Hitler was said to be nothing more than a wallpaper hanger, and was alleged to spend most of his time either chewing on the carpet or baying at the moon when he was not screaming and gesticulating. It was reported that he only had one testicle and secretly harbored sexually deviant thoughts. It was spread around that Goering was a hedonistic drug addict who wore women’s silk underpants. Germany’s Foreign Minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, was accused of being a phony poseur, who was no aristocrat at all as his “von” indicated, but had previously been only a lowly wine salesman. Himmler had been a chicken farmer. Dr. Joseph Goebbels was said to have invented his doctorate credentials. Each Nazi official was attacked and smeared in similar fashion.

Hermann Goering, in reality, was born into a wealthy, aristocratic family and was well educated. His relatives included Count von Zeppelin, producer of the lighter than air dirigibles; the Merk pharmaceutical family; and the Baroness Gertud von Le Fort, among others. He was a flying ace in WWI, won the “Blue Max,” and eventually became the commanding officer of the “Red Barron” squadron, after the Red Barron was shot down and killed. He was also an art collector and a lover of opera.

[Add. Image — Germany’s Foreign Minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop.]

Ribbentrop, the son of a German Army officer, was also well educated, spoke German, French and English fluently, and won the Iron Cross as an army officer in WWI. After the war he married the daughter of a wealthy Champagne producer, eventually becoming a partner in the firm, which made him wealthy. He went on to establish his own “Impegroma Importing Company” and became even wealthier. By all accounts, he was a gentleman of refined tastes and polished manners.

[Add. Image — Dr. Joseph Goebbels.]

Dr. Joseph Goebbels received a Ph.D. from Heidelberg University. He studied philosophy, history, art and literature and had a reputation for brilliance. He worked as a journalist before entering politics.

[Add. Image — Rudolph Hess (26 April 1894 – 17 August 1987).]

Rudolph Hess was born to a prosperous German business man in Alexandria, Egypt, was educated at the Neuchatel University in Switzerland in a Business curriculum. He was a lieutenant and a pilot during WWI. After the war, he studied political science, history, economics and geopolitics at the University of Munich. He was the co-author of Mein Kampf.

Heinrich Himmler obtained a degree in agronomy from the University of Munich and was a chicken farmer before entering politics, in the same sense that Jimmy Carter was a peanut farmer.

Reinhard Heydrich came from an upper class family, was educated at the Naval Academy, and served his early years as a Naval officer. He was a talented violinist and a champion fencer and swimmer.

Hjalmar Schacht was a Ph.D. Economist and head of the German National Bank under Hitler.

Albert Speer was an architect and came from a wealthy bourgeois family.

One of Hitler’s closest intimates was the Harvard educated Ernst Hanfstaengl.

Baldur von Schirach was an aristocrat who was a published author and a regular contributor to literary journals.

Hans Frank was a lawyer who began his political career as an early member of the German Worker’s Party and became Hitler’s private attorney.

Alfred Rosenberg was born in Estonia, the son of a wealthy Baltic-German merchant. Rosenberg studied architecture at the Riga Polytechnic Institute, and engineering at Moscow’s “Highest Technical School” and obtained his Ph.D. in 1917. He immigrated to Germany in 1918. He became the editor of the Nazi newspaper the Volkischer Beobachter (Peoples Observer). He, like Ribbentrop, was fluent in several languages.

It simply was not true that the Nazi regime was comprised of low-class, thuggish, ignoramuses. Most of them, in fact, were educated, cultured and highly capable. But their credentials didn’t matter to the Jewish smear bund. They were in the business of discrediting Hitler and the Nazis, and they did it as they have always done, with lies, half truths and distortions. Compare the Nazi leaders, for example, to our own Harry Truman, who never went to college at all and was a failed haberdasher before entering politics; rather low, compared, for example, to the suave, multi-lingual and wealthy Champagne merchant that von Ribbentrop was before he entered politics. The Jewish press never made a point of Truman’s low beginnings.

Events in Germany under the Nazis were deliberately misrepresented in the Jewish press. Small events were hysterically exaggerated and blown out of all proportion to their actual significance. Any rumor of an action, or even a slight, against the Jews was trumpeted hysterically, with predictions of mass extermination just around the corner. Any salacious rumor about any Nazi was published as fact, and supported by those famous “eye witnesses” (who later served as the basis for their “Holocaust” claims, despite the absence of forensic evidence), and given wide publicity.

This propaganda campaign against the Hitler regime was reminiscent of the bogus propaganda campaign against Germany during World War I, in which German soldiers were said to have speared babies on their bayonets, cut off the hands of boys and to have raped and violated young girls; all of which was proven after the war to have been a total fabrication for the purpose of creating hatred against Germany.

[Add. Image — Anti-Nazi propaganda poster.]

Nazi officials indignantly denied the smears and lies propagated in the Jewish media, and even issued official, written protests, but they fell on deaf ears. The Jews had been only too successful in their anti-Nazi, anti-German propaganda campaign because they controlled the mainstream media throughout the western world. Germany had no means of countering the smears, and so the smears were believed. Not only were the minds of the public, especially in Britain and America, poisoned against the Nazis and Germany, but even highly placed public officials, who should have know better, were taken in and became ardent Nazi haters as a result of the propaganda.

President Roosevelt himself became one of the most vituperative German haters of all. He frequently uttered personally insulting and disparaging remarks in public about Hitler and other individuals in the Nazi government, which destroyed any possibility of amicable diplomatic relations between the American and German governments. Roosevelt became virulently anti-German because he was surrounded by anti-German Jewish advisors, including, among others, Hans Morgenthau, Bernard Baruch, and Felix Frankfurter. The historian Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. (himself a Jew) noted about President Roosevelt:

 

“No president had appointed so many Jews to public office. No president had surrounded himself with so many Jewish advisers. No president had condemned anti-Semitism with such eloquence and persistence. Jews were mostly liberals in those faraway days, and a vast majority voted four times for FDR.”

In addition to their anti-German propaganda campaign beginning immediately after the Nazis came to power, Jewish leaders organized mass anti-Nazi demonstrations, not in Germany, but in cities throughout Europe and Britain, and especially in America. On March 12, 1933, eleven days before passage of the Enabling Act which gave all power to Hitler, and well before any action of any kind had been taken against Jews in Germany, the American Jewish Congress announced a massive anti-Nazi protest to take place on March 27 at Madison Square Garden in New York City. The commander-in-chief of Jewish War Veterans called for an American boycott of German goods. On March 23, a protest rally of 20,000 Jews was staged in front of New York’s City Hall. Rallies were also staged outside the North German Lloyd and Hamburg-American shipping lines in New York, and boycotts were organized against German goods in shops and businesses throughout New York City. Up to this point, not a finger had been lifted against the Jews in Germany. Not a single measure had been taken against them. All of the hysterical anti-German activity by the Jews was only in “anticipation” of what the Nazis “might” do.

On March 24, 1933, one day after Hitler became Chancellor, the Daily Express of London carried the headline proclaiming that “Judea Declares War on Germany ― Jews Of All the World Unite In Action― Boycott of German Goods ― Mass Demonstrations.” (See below.)

[Below — Text of newspaper article]

BOYCOTT OF GERMAN GOODS

MASS DEMONSTRATIONS IN MANY DISTRICTS

DRAMATIC ACTION

“Daily Express” Special Political Correspondent.

ALL Israel is uniting in wrath against the Nazi onslaught on the Jews in Germany.

Adolf Hitler, swept into power by an appeal to elemental patriotism, is making history of a kind he least expected. Thinking to unite only the German nation to race consciousness he has roused the whole Jewish people to a national renaissance.

The appearance of the Swastika symbol of a new Germany has called forth the Lion of Judah, the old battle symbol of Jewish defiance.

Fourteen million Jews dispersed throughout the world have banded together as one man to declare war on the German persecutors of their co-religionists. Sectional differences and antagonisms have been submerged in one common aim―to stand by the 600,000 Jews of Germany who are terrorised by Hitlerist anti-Semitism, and to compel Fascist Germany to end its campaign of violence and suppression directed against its Jewish minority.

World Jewry has made up its mind not to rest quiescent in face of this revival of medieval Jew-baiting.

Germany may be called on to pay a heavy price for Hitler’s antagonism to the Jews. She is faced with an International boycott in commerce, finance, and ministry. She may find herself in spiritual and cultural isolation, recoiling before the burning crusade that Jews of all lands are launching in defence of their afflicted brethren.

The Jewish merchant prince is leaving his counting-house, the banker his board-room, the shopkeeper his store, and the pedlar his humble barrow a holy war to combat the Hitlerist enemies of the Jew.

CONCERTED ACTION

Plans for concerted Jewish action are being matured in Europe and America to strike back in reprisal at Hitlerist Germany.

In London, New York, Paris, and Warsaw, Jewish merchants are uniting for a commercial crusade against Germany.

Resolutions are being taken throughout the Jewish business world to seve trade relations with Germany.

Large numbers of merchants in London have resolved to stop buying German goods, even at the cost of suffering heavy loss.

Similar action is being taken throughout the United States. Mass meetings in New York and other American cities attended by hundreds of thousands of indignant Jews, have called for a wholesale boycott of German goods. In Poland the trade embargo on Germany is already in operation. In France a proposed ban on German imports is being widely canvassed in Jewish circles.

A concerted world boycott by Jewish buyers is likely to involve grave damage to the German export trade. Jewish merchants all over the world are large buyers of German manufactured goods, chiefly cotton goods, silks, toys, electrical fittings, and furniture.

A meeting of the Jewish textile trade in London has been called for Monday to consider the situation and to determine what steps should be taken in regard to Germany.

SHIPPING THREAT

Germany is a heavy borrower in foreign money markets, where Jewish effluence is considerable. Continued anti-Semitism in Germany is likely to react seriously against her. A move is on foot on the part of Jewish financiers action to stop.

Germany’s Transatlantic shipping traffic is likewise threatened. The Bremen and the Europa, the German crack liners, may suffer heavily from a Jewish anti-German boycott. Jewish trans-ocean travellers from an important part of the patrons of these liners because of their extensive part in international trade. The loss of their patronage would be a heavy blow to Germany’s Atlantic trade.

World-wide preparations are being made to organise great Jewish demonstrations of protest to call attention to the sufferings of the German Jews at the hands of the Hitlerites, and to demand action to stop German anti-Semitism.

The whole of American Jewry has been roused to an unprecedented heat of indignation agents Germany. A rabbinical decree in New York has made next Monday a day of fasting and prayer over the Hitler campaign.

Fasting will begin on Sunday at sunset and finish at sunset on Monday. All Jewish shops in New York will be closed on Monday during a parade.

Apart from a monster meeting in Madison Square Garden, meetings are to be held in 300 American cities.

Madison Square Garden will see the remarkable sight of Bishop Manning peaking from a Jewish platform appealing for an end of the Hitler “terror”.

[Add. Image — A rally to boycott Nazi Germany, held at the third Madison Square Garden on March 15, 1937. It was sponsored by the American Jewish Congress and the Jewish Labor Committee. John L. Lewis of the Congress of Industrial Organizations and New York City mayor Fiorello LaGuardia were among the speakers.]

Every Rabbi in the City of New York has been placed under a scared obligation by Rabbinical decree to devote Saturday’s sermon to the plight of the Jews in Germany.

The New York Times this morning says a list of a thousand German immigrations who have come to the United States during recent years has been compiled by an overseas Nazi organisation, the object being to use these people for Nazi propaganda in the United States.

SPECIAL SESSION

The organisation of Jewish youth in Britain is organising demonstrations in London and the provinces during the week-end.

The Board of Deputies of British Jews, representing the entire Jewish community in Great Britain, is meeting in special session on Sunday to discuss the German situation and decide on what action is to be taken to counteract the attacks on their German fellow Jews.

Members of the American House of Representatives are introduction resolutions protesting against the anti-Jewish express in Germany. The American trade unions, representing 3,000,000 workers, have also decided to join in the protests.

Representative Jewish organisations in the European capitals are understood in to be making representations to their respective Governments to use influence with the Hitler Cabinet to induce it to call a halt in the oppression of the German Jews.

The old and reunited people of Israel are rising with new and modern weapons to fight this age old battle with their persecutors.

The article describes a planned “holy war” against Germany and went on to implore Jews everywhere to boycott German goods and engage in mass demonstrations against German economic interests. According to the Daily Express:

“The whole of Israel throughout the world [International Jewry] is uniting to declare an economic and financial war on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the symbol of the new Germany has revived the old war symbol of Judas to new life. Fourteen million Jews scattered over the entire world are tight to each other as if one man, in order to declare war against the German persecutors of their fellow believers. The Jewish wholesaler will quit his house, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his business, and the beggar his humble hut, in order to join the holy war against Hitler’s people.”

The Daily Express said that Germany was;

“now confronted with an international boycott of its trade, its finances, and its industry…In London, New York, Paris, Warsaw, Jewish businessmen are united to go on an economic crusade.”

 

An anti-German boycott sign on a store in New York City.

The Jewish War on Germany was declared in 1933 before any action of any kind had been taken against German Jews.

This Daily Express report described how Jewish leaders, in combination with powerful international Jewish financial interests, had launched a boycott against Germany for the express purpose of crippling Germany’s already precarious economy in order to bring down the new Hitler regime.

“London’s Daily Herald carried an interview with a prominent Jewish leader who admitted, ‘The leaders are hanging back,’ but the Jewish people are ‘forcing its leaders on.’ Already the boycott has damaged ‘hundreds of thousands of pounds of German trade’.” (Edwin Black, Jewish author. The Transfer Agreement, p.34.)

“In London, almost all Jewish shops in the Whitechapel district were displaying placards denying entry to German salesmen and affirming their anti-Nazi boycott. Teenagers patrolled the streets distributing handbills asking shoppers to boycott German goods…..” (Edwin Black, Jewish writer and author, The Transfer Agreement, p.46/47.)

Mass meetings of Jews were held throughout Poland expressing support for the boycott. The largest Warsaw Jewish commercial organizations passed binding resolutions to;

 

“use the most radical means of defense by boycotting German imports.”

After this spectacular declaration of war, it should have been clear to all Jews, and particularly those Jews living in Germany, that such a provocation would produce some kind of backlash. This declaration of war did nothing for the Jews in Germany, except to intensify the German peoples’ hostility towards them and to cause the German people to see the Jews in Germany as “an enemy within.”

Immediate results of the Jewish boycott could be seen against the German steamship lines in New York, for example, where shipping orders were cancelled and passenger tickets went unsold. International Jewish networking demonstrated its effectiveness when boycott movements quickly developed in Lithuania, France, Holland, Great Britain and Egypt. Jewish controlled trade unions in Britain and America spread signs everywhere that read “Boycott German Goods.” Several firms began canceling their German orders of goods.

Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering

The Germans were very worried. Hermann Goering summoned the leaders of the three main Jewish organizations in Germany to his office and accused them of being responsible for all the agitation against Germany. He told them that:

 

“Unless you put a stop to these libelous accusations immediately, I shall no longer be able to vouch for the safety of the German Jews.”

Goering wanted them to go to London and to the U.S. to convince the Jewish leaders that nothing was happening to Jews in Germany. In fact, Ernst Wallach, the vice president of the Jewish organization “Central Verein,” was already in the United States doing exactly that, and trying to dissuade the American Jewish Congress from its anti-German activities. The leaders of the three German Jewish organizations all agreed to do as Goering had asked.

After the meeting, these Jewish leaders immediately mobilized their organizations to inform the British and American publics that the hysterical reports of ill treatment of Jews in Germany were not true. The three German Jewish leaders then travelled to London and met with Stephen Wise, head of the American Jewish Congress, and begged him to cancel the demonstration scheduled for March 27 in Madison Square Garden. Ernest Wallach from the Central Verein also begged Stephen Wise, that if he could not cancel the demonstration, he should at least try to quiet down the emotions.

Too much momentum had built up due to the hysterical anti-Nazi propaganda spewed out by the Jewish media, so Wise was unable to cancel the rally. The planned protest rally at Madison Square Garden took place, as scheduled, on March 27, 1933 and drew 40,000 people. (New York Daily News headlines: “40,000 Roar Protest Here Against Hitler”).

But Wise was able to tone it down a bit with a conciliatory speech at the rally. Similar rallies and protest marches were also held by Jewish groups in other cities.

In spite of the efforts of these Jewish leaders to contain the anti-Nazi hysteria, the announced boycott against Germany began to have its intended effect. Two days after the boycott was announced, an organization called the Jewish War Veterans produced data that showed $2 million (in 1933 dollars ― that would be equivalent to $35 million today) in cancelled German orders.

Hitler had previously threatened to boycott Jewish stores in Germany if the International Jewish campaign against Germany did not stop. The day following the March 27 Madison Square Garden rally, Hitler made a speech during which he ordered a one-day boycott of Jewish stores and goods in Germany. This was in direct response to the Jewish boycott against Germany. The boycott was ineffectual, as it turned out, because it was largely ignored by the German people.

[Add. Image — Jewish stores in Germany were boycotted  on April 1, 1933 for one day in retaliation of Jewish boycott of German goods.]

Hitler’s one-day boycott of Jewish stores and goods is given wide coverage in current history books and in articles written about the period, but the Jewish boycott against Germany which provoked it is rarely if ever mentioned. Though Hitler’s boycott of Jewish stores lasted only a day, the Jewish boycott of Germany continued and even intensified for years.

Hitler soon initiated a rapid series of laws to limit Jewish power and control in Germany, as he had promised to do during his election campaign. On April 7 “The Law of the Restoration of the Civil Service” was enacted which limited civil service jobs to ethnic Germans. Jews were less than 1% of the German population, yet, they dominated the Weimar government and filled an inordinate percentage of civil service jobs in pre-Hitler Germany. Under the new National Socialist regime, all Jews holding those positions were either dismissed or forced into paid retirement. As detailed in previous chapters, this tiny Jewish minority also dominated the professions in Germany. On April 22, a law was enacted to reduce Jewish numbers within the professions to somewhere near their percentage within the population of Germany. The April 22 law prohibited Jews from serving as patent lawyers and also from serving as doctors in state-run insurance programs. They were still permitted to practice, but not in government supported positions.

On April 25, a law restricting the number of Jewish children allowed to enroll in institutions of higher learning was enacted. The law limited Jewish enrollment to their percentage in the population.

On May 10, 1933, German students from the universities gathered in Berlin and other German cities to burn books which contained subversive, obscene or un-German themes, especially those by Jewish writers. Propaganda Minister, Joseph Goebbels, declared:

 

“The soul of the German people can again express itself. These flames not only illuminate the final end of an old era; they also light up the new.”

 

Part of the Nazis program to clean up Germany was to burn books with subversive, obscene, or un-German themes. Here, in the Operplatz in Berlin, on May 10, 1933, Nazi salutes and anthems accompany the smoldering pile of filth cleaned out of German libraries.

On June 2, Jewish dentists and dental technicians were barred from state-run insurance plans, though they were allowed to continue in private practice, just not in state run programs.

Hostilities toward Jews increased all across Germany as the result of the declaration of war against Germany by International Jewry. Many shops and restaurants refused to serve Jewish people. Placards saying “Jews not admitted” and “Jews enter this place at their own risk” began to appear all over Germany. In some parts of the country Jews were banned from public parks, swimming pools and public transport.

The Jewish boycott almost brought the Third Reich to its knees before it ever got started. Jews controlled much of the world’s shipping, so they had the means of blocking German exports and imports. Moreover, this was the worst possible time for Germany to be a victim of a boycott, as Germany was already deep in a depression with a quarter of her work force out of work.

Hitler demanded an end to the boycott, saying that there was absolutely no justification for it. He appealed to Jewish leaders in Britain and America to condemn the boycott, and many responsible Jewish leaders did so. Lord Reading, a prominent Jew in the House of Commons, and Lord Herbert Samuel, also Jewish, made a joint declaration saying;

“we deprecate exaggerated reports of occurrences in Germany or any attempts to boycott German goods.”

Following that, the British Foreign Minister John Simon gave the German ambassador a letter supporting that declaration. Yet, the International Jewish war against Germany continued unabated with accusations and charges against Germany becoming ever more salacious and sensational.

In July, 1933 in Amsterdam, Holland, an International Jewish Boycott Conference was organized and assembled under Samuel Untermeyer’s leadership. Untermeyer was elected President of the “International jewish Federation to Combat the Hitlerite oppression of the Jews.” He had also been elected President of the “World Jewish Economic Federation.” This belligerent organization had been set up to counter the Third Reich’s program of restricting Jewish power and control in Germany.

The conference was a call to International Jewry to wage total war against Germany with all means at their disposal, including propaganda, financial manipulation, and an intensification of the boycott, while at the same time protecting Jewish interests in Germany.

On his return to the United States, Untermeyer gave a radio address over station WABC in New York City, during which he announced his declaration of war. The text of this address was then published in the New York Times’ August 7, 1933 edition, and is presented in its entirety below.

Untermeyer’s inflammatory speech was a blatant misrepresentation of what was happening in Germany. His claims of Nazi atrocities against Jews were simply not true. Untermeyer hyperbolically described Nazism as a;

“curse that has descended upon benighted Germany, which has thereby been converted from a nation of culture into a veritable hell of cruel and savage beasts.”

In comparison, he described the Jews as the “aristocrats of the world.”

Untermeyer declared that Germany intended to “exterminate” the Jewish race. This was 1933! No one in Germany had ever uttered such a threat. Untermeyer proclaimed a “holy war” against Germany to destroy Germany’s very existence. Jews all over the world were ordered not to buy German goods, not to patronize German merchants, not to deal with or buy from firms that did business with Germany, and not to ship goods on German ships. Jewish bankers were told not to lend money to Germans. Untermeyer, speaking officially for all the Jews of the world, said;

“what we are proposing and what we have already gone far toward doing…is to undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends.”

Thus a “holy war” of revenge was begun and was already under way by August 7, 1933, the day of Untermeyer’s speech.

Untermeyer’s speech was a landmark speech in that it was the first to accuse Nazi Germany of the intention to “exterminate” the Jewish people, though no such threat had ever been made by anyone in Germany. He accused the Nazis of committing unspeakable cruelties and atrocities against the Jews inside Germany, though, in reality, nothing whatever had happened to the Jews by the time he gave his speech. This kind of inflammatory, though baseless, accusation of German atrocities against the Jews was to continue, and even intensify, right through the Nazi period in the 1930s, right through the war, and into the Nuremburg Trials after the war. It could be said that the March 24, 1933 Jewish declaration of war on Germany, followed by the International Jewish Boycott Conference of July, 1933, was the real beginning of World War Two.

The German government protested this speech, but it fell on deaf ears in America and Britain who had already been conditioned to believe the worst about Germany as a result of the relentless anti-German propaganda campaign spewing out of the Jewish press since 1921.

Untermeyer’s entire speech is presented below so that the reader may judge its inflammatory nature for himself.

Jewish leader, Samuel Untermeyer.

Text of Untermeyer’s Speech in New York City after his return from Amsterdam

My Friends: What a joy and relief and sense of security to be once more on American soil! The nightmares of horrors through which I have passed in those two weeks in Europe, listening to the heartbreaking tales of refugee victims, beggar description.

I deeply appreciate your enthusiastic greeting on my arrival today, which I quite understand is addressed not to me personally but to the holy war in the cause of humanity in which we are embarked. Jews and non-Jews alike, for we are equally concerned that the work of centuries shall not be undone, and that civilization shall not be allowed to die.

It is a war that must be waged unremittingly until the black clouds of bigotry, race hatred and fanaticism that have descended upon what was once Germany, but is now medieval Hitlerland, have been dispersed. If we will but enlist to a man and persist in our purpose, the bright sun of civilization will again shine upon Germany, and the world will be a safer place in which to dwell.

As our ship sailed up the bay today past our proud Statue of Liberty, I breathed a prayer of gratitude and thanksgiving that this fair land of freedom has escaped the curse that has descended upon benighted Germany, which has thereby been converted from a nation of culture into a veritable hell of cruel and savage beasts.

The World’s Concern

We owe it not only to our persecuted brethren but to the entire world to now strike in self-defense a blow that will free humanity from a repetition of this incredible outrage. This time the Jews are the victims, next time it may be the Catholics or the Protestants. If we once admit, as is brazenly insisted by the German Government, that such fiendish persecution of the people of one race or creed is an internal domestic affair and not a world concern, how are we to know whose turn will be next?

Now or never must all the nations of the earth make common cause against the monstrous claim that the slaughter, starvation and annihilation, by a country that has reverted to barbarism, of its own innocent and defenseless citizens without rhyme, reason or excuse is an internal affair against which the rest of the world must stand idly by and not lift a hand in defense.

I have seen and talked with many of these terror-stricken refugees who have had the good fortune to escape over the border, though forced to leave their property behind them, and I want to say to you that nothing that has seeped through to you over the rigid censorship and lying propaganda that are at work to conceal and misrepresent the situation of the Jews in Germany begins to tell a fraction of the frightful story of fiendish torture, cruelty and persecution that are being inflicted day by day upon these men, women and children, of the terrors of worse than death in which they are living.

When the tale is told, as it will be some day if the impotent League of Nations ever sufficiently awakens from its Rip Van Winkle slumbers to the realization of its power and duty to prosecute an investigation into the facts, the world will confront a picture so fearful in its barbarous cruelty that the hell of war and the alleged Belgian atrocities will pale into insignificance as compared to this devilishly, deliberately, cold-bloodedly planned and already partially executed campaign for the extermination of a proud, gentle, loyal, law-abiding people ― a people who love and have shed their blood for their Fatherland, and to whom Germany owes in large part its prosperity and its great scientists, educators, lawyers, physicians, poets, musicians, diplomats and philosophers, who are the backbone of its past cultural life.

Back to Dark Ages

But why dwell longer upon this revolting picture of the ravages wrought by these ingrates and beasts of prey, animated by the loathsome motives of race hatred, bigotry and envy. For the Jews are the aristocrats of the world. From time immemorial they have been persecuted and have seen their persecutors come and go.

They alone have survived. And so will history repeat itself, but that furnishes no reason why we should permit this reversion of a once great nation to the Dark Ages or fail to rescue these 600,000 human souls from the tortures of hell as we can with the aid of our Christian friends, if we have the will to act.

Protests and pleas from all corners of the earth, from the leaders of all creeds, having proven as vain and unavailing as was the idealistic dream of our martyred President of making the world safe for democracy and of protecting minorities, what then are to be the lines of our defensive campaign against these atrocities, on which we are already actively embarked? Are we right in our plan? If so, what steps shall now be prosecuted to attain success?

Our campaign is twofold ― defensive and constructive. On the defensive side will be the economic boycott against all German goods, shipping and services. On the constructive side will be an appeal to the League of Nations to construe and enforce the labor union provisions of the Versailles Treaty and the written promises made by Germany, while the treaty was under negotiation, to protect its minorities, which have been flagrantly violated by its disfranchisement and persecution of the German Jews.

What Boycott Means

As in the boycott, strange to say a mere handful in number, but powerful in influence, of our thoughtless but doubtless well-intentioned Jews seem obsessed and frightened at the bare mention of the word “boycott”. It signifies and conjures up to them images of force and illegality, such as have on occasions in the past characterized struggles between labor unions and their employers. As these timid souls are capitalists and employers, the word and all that it implies are hateful to their ears.

In point of fact, it signifies nothing of the kind. These gentlemen do not know what they are talking or thinking about. Instead of surrendering to their vague fears and half-baked ideas, our first duty is to educate them as to what is meant by a purely defensive economic boycott, and what we are doing and proposing.

Admittedly, the boycott is our only really effective weapon. These gentlemen who are taking counsel of their groundless fears to the exclusion of their reason have done nothing and have no program except to attempt to arouse world opinion, which is and has been from the outset on our side, as it was bound to be because of this brutal, senseless, unprovoked assault upon civilization.

It is not necessary to belittle or underrate that accomplishment, if their aimless, fruitless endeavors in that direction may be so dignified in recognition of their good intentions, barren of results as they have been.

It is sufficient that their efforts have proven unavailing and that the campaign of Schreckligheit not only goes on unabated in the face of unanimous world opinion; but that it is increasing in intensity and that the masses of the German people, misled by government propaganda and suppression of free speech and of the press, are either voluntarily, or through fear of punishment at the hands of their despotic rulers, supporting their government in this hellish campaign.

What then have these amiable gentlemen accomplished and what do they hope or expect to accomplish in the way of stemming this conflagration of civilization by their “feather-duster” methods? You cannot put out a fire, and especially that kind of a fire, by just looking on until the mad flames, fanned by the wind of hate, have destroyed everything.

What we are proposing and have already gone far toward doing, is to prosecute a purely defensive economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends.

Force Them to Learn

They have flaunted and persisted in flaunting and defying world opinion. We propose to and are organizing world opinion to express itself in the only way Germany can be made to understand. Hitler and his mob will not permit their people to know how they are regarded by the outside world. We shall force them to learn in the only way open to us.

Revolting as it is, it would be an interesting study in psychology to analyze the motives, other than fear and cowardice, that have prompted Jewish bankers to lend money to Germany as they are now doing. It is in part their money that is being used by the Hitler regime in its reckless, wicked campaign of propaganda to make the world anti-Semitic; with that money they have invaded Great Britain, the United States and other countries where they have established newspapers, subsidized agents and otherwise are spending untold millions in spreading their infamous creed.

The suggestion that they use that money toward paying the honest debts they have repudiated is answered only by contemptuous sneers and silence. Meantime the infamous campaign goes on unabated with ever increasing intensity to the everlasting disgrace of the Jewish bankers who are helping to finance it and of the weaklings who are doing nothing effective to check it.

The Hitler regime originated are fiendishly prosecuting their boycott to exterminate the Jews by placarding Jewish shops, warning Germans against dealing with them, by imprisoning Jewish shopkeepers and parading them through the streets by the hundreds under guard of Nazi troops for the sole crime of being Jews, by ejecting them from the learned professions in which many of them had attained eminence, by excluding their children from the schools, their men from the labor unions, closing against them every avenue of livelihood, locking them in vile concentration camps, starving and torturing them, murdering and beating them without cause and resorting to every other conceivable form of torture, inhuman beyond conception, until suicide has become their only means of escape, and all solely because they are or their remote ancestors were Jews, and all with the avowed object of exterminating them.

Appeal to Mankind

As against this, the foulest boycott in the annals of time, we are appealing to all mankind to enforce a counter-boycott. That appeal is meeting with the conviction that idealism and justice are still alive.

There is nothing new in the use of the economic boycott as an instrument of justice. The covenant of the League of Nations expressly provides in these identical words for its use to bring recalcitrant nations to terms. 

President Roosevelt, whose wise statesmanship and vision are the wonder of the civilized world, is invoking it in furtherance of his noble conception for the readjustment of the relations between capital and labor under the terms of the sweeping Industrial Recovery Act, to the end that labor shall receive a more just share of the wealth it creates. He is about to enlist the consumers of the country in a national campaign in which they pledge themselves to boycott all manufacturers, jobbers and retailers who fail to subscribe to the codes and to buy only from those who have assented and who are thereby privileged to fly the blue eagle of NRA [National Recovery Act]. What more exalted precedent do our timid friends want?

With this explanation of our aims, I appeal to the American Jewish Committee, whose public spirit and good intentions I do not for a moment question, but the wisdom of whose judgment I challenge, no longer to hold aloof but to rid themselves of their timid and ill-considered prejudices and join in actively pressing this boycott as our only weapon except the appeal to the League, which I shall discuss at a later time.

I purposely refrain from including the American Jewish Congress in this appeal because I am satisfied that 95 per cent of their members are already with us and that they are being misrepresented by two or three men now abroad. Of them I ask that, prior to the meeting to be held this month in Prague by their executive committee, they instruct these false leaders in no uncertain terms as to the stand they must take on this all-important subject and demand that they shall either openly represent their views or resign their offices. One of them, generally recognized as the kingpin of mischief makers, is junketing around the Continent engaged in his favorite pastime of spreading discord, asserting at one time and place that he favors and supports the boycott and at another that he is opposed or indifferent to it, all dependent on the audience he is addressing; but always directly or indirectly delivering a stab in the dark.

Progress So Far Made

There is not time now, but I hope and expect in the near future to be able to report to you the steps that have been taken and that are already under way, and the surprising and gratifying progress already made in many countries toward the success of the economic boycott in which we are engaged. Although considerable progress in that direction has already been made in Great Britain and in the United States, you will be surprised to learn that they are the least advanced and as yet the most inadequately organized of all the countries that were represented at the Amsterdam World Economic Conference, where the boycott was unanimously and enthusiastically approved by formal resolution by a rising vote.

With us in America the delay has been due in part to lack of funds and the vast territory to be covered, but it is hoped, and expected, that this condition will soon be corrected. The object-lesson we are determined to teach is so priceless to all humanity that we dare not fall.

Each of you, Jew and Gentile alike, who has not already enlisted in this sacred war should do so now and here. It is not sufficient that you buy no goods made in Germany. You must refuse to deal with any merchant or shopkeeper who sells any German-made goods or who patronizes German ships or shipping.

To our shame be it said that there are a few Jews among us, but fortunately only a few, so wanting in dignity and self-respect that they are willing to travel on German ships where they are despised and meet with the just contempt of the servants who wait upon them and of their fellow passengers. Their names should be heralded far and wide. They are traitors to their race.

In conclusion, permit me again to thank you for this heartening reception and to assure you that, with your support and that of our millions of non-Jewish friends, we will drive the last nail in the coffin of bigotry and fanaticism that has dared raise its ugly head to slander, belie and disgrace twentieth century civilization. The end.

Untermeyer’s speech was inflammatory by any standard, filled with hyperbole, exaggeration and falsehood, though it was to prove to be only typical of Jewish commentary on Nazi Germany from that time forward until Germany’s final defeat. Jews wage war with propaganda, not armed soldiers, at least, as already mentioned above, not their own armed soldiers, and they were waging a full scale war against Nazi Germany at this time, no less than Britain, Russia and the USA waged war against Germany somewhat later, with armed men. A joke making the rounds at the time was that the Jewish national anthem ought to be “Onward Christian Soldiers.” It is also a cultural characteristic of Jews to wildly exaggerate their troubles and woes and to protest loudly and melodramatically, any slight, either real or imagined, against them. They even have a word for it ― kvetching.

Untermeyer spoke of the “fiendish torture and cruelty” Jews were being subjected to day-by-day in Germany, and of “terrors worse than death.”

Nothing of the kind was happening in Germany, except in his fevered imagination. Untermeyer referred in the early part of his speech to “the holy war in the cause of humanity in which we are embarked.” He went on to develop this theme at great length. He described the Jews as the “aristocrats of the world.” He made a call to action:

“Each of you, Jew and Gentile alike, who has not already enlisted in this sacred war should do so now and here.”

Those Jews who did not wish to join in his “holy war,” he denounced, declaring: “They are traitors to their race.”

The Jewish Persecution Myth

In his 1952 book, “Behind Communism,” Frank L. Britton explains the phenomenon of the Jewish persecution myth. Britton says that the persecution myth is the “adhesive and cement of Judaism; without it Jews would have long since ceased to exist” as a nationality. He says that though Jews do not always agree among themselves, in the presence of their enemies, real or imagined, Jewish thinking crystallizes into unanimity. Through 25 centuries, he says, the Jewish mind has been conditioned by the shrill refrain of “persecution!” Every accident of fate is chronicled, enhanced, and passed on to succeeding generations as another example of gentile cruelty to the Chosen People. Any opposition to Jewish aspirations and ambitions, he says, is also translated into these same terms of persecution, and all Jewish aggression and exploitation of others in the pursuit of their aspirations is excused on the same basis.

To be sure, the Jewish people have suffered numerous hardships in the course of their history, but this is also true of other peoples. The primary difference is that the Jews keep score. They never forget and they never forgive. They have cultivated within the collective Jewish mind an exaggerated sense of self-righteousness and a compulsion for vengeance seeking. Gentiles move on and put their misfortunes behind them, but the Jews have made a tradition of nurturing their memories of persecution.

They nurse and savor every grievance and store them away in Jewish cultural memory. A slaughter of a few thousand Christians is remembered by no one in 50 years time, but a similar incident in which Jews are killed is preserved forever in Jewish histories, embellished and amplified in the retelling. They recite and bewail their woes not only to themselves, but seek sympathy by declaiming them in exaggerated form to the world. A sort of leitmotif of “Jews as eternal victims” runs through Jewish story-telling, to the point that Jewish history seems like a bizarre comic version of a Wagnerian opera. Part of the Jewish psyche is the suspicion that Gentiles are planning their extermination. This has been a constant refrain throughout Jewish history. (Even today, they loudly and repeatedly declaim that Iran intends to “wipe Israel off the map.”) The three motivating factors of Jewish culture which seem to most influence their outlook on the world, and which govern their relationship with their Gentile hosts amongst whom they live, are, 1) the persecution myth, 2) the extermination fantasy, and 3) vengeance seeking.

Untermeyer’s speech, as well as all of the hysterical anti-German Jewish propaganda should be seen in this light. Jewish Holocaust claims should also be seen in this light. The Jews claim 6 million of their people were killed in the Holocaust. But the number “6 million” seems more like a metaphor than an actual number, used again and again in Jewish historical story-telling. Surely the actual number was only a fraction of that.

1902 ― On page 482 of the article on “Anti-Semitism” in the 10th Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica (1902), for example, is found the words:

“While there are in Russia and Rumania six millions of Jews who are being systematically degraded…”

This reference precedes references to the 6 million of WWII by approximately 40 years.

1906 ― In the New York Times, March 25, 1906 edition, an article titled “Dr. Nathan’s View of Russian Massacre,” worried about the “condition and future of Russia’s 6 million Jews…” The article goes on to say:

“…the Russian Government’s studied policy for the ‘solution’ of the Jewish question is systematically and murderous extermination.”

1911 ― Max Nordau, co-founder of the World Zionist Organization, warns of the “annihilation of 6 million” at the Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland. This was 22 years before Hitler came to power.

1919 ― In the American Hebrew Magazine of October 31, 1919, there appeared an article entitled “The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!” By Martin H. Glynn, former governor of the state of New York. This article begins:

“From across the sea, six million men and women call to us for help …”.

The article goes on to include passages such as:

“…when six million human beings are being whirled toward the grave…,” “Six million men and women are dying…,” “…and a bigoted lust for Jewish blood.” “In this threatened holocaust…,” ad infinitum.

The article was published approximately 20 years before the outbreak of WW2.

1921 ― In the Chicago Tribune, July 20, 1921, an article headlined:

“Begs America Save 6,000,000 in Russia.” The article claims, “Russia’s 6,000,000 Jews are facing extermination.”

1936 ― In the New York Times, May 31, 1936, an article headlined “Americans Appeal For Jewish Refuge,” appealed to Britain to:

“…throw open the gates of Palestine and let in the victimized and persecuted Jews escaping from the European holocaust.”

1940 ― In the Palm Beach Post, June 25, 1940, an article reported Dr. Nahum Goldman, administrative committee chairman of the World Jewish Congress, said today that if the Nazis should achieve final victory 6,000,000 Jews in Europe are “doomed to destruction.”

1943 ― The Polish Jew Rafael Lemkin, in his book “Axis Rule in Occupied Europe,” published in New York in 1943, claimed that the Nazis had already killed millions of Jews, “perhaps as many as 6 million,” he said. This would have been a remarkable feat by 1943, since the alleged extermination of Jews, according the Jews themselves, only began in 1942.

1945 ― In a New York Times article of January 8, 1945, four months before the war in Europe ended, and before anyone could possibly have known how many Jews, if any, had died, it was reported that 6,000,000 Jews were dead.

1945 ― An article in the Pittsburg Press, May 13, 1945 headlined “Nazis Destroy Six Million Jews.”

Obviously, Jewish claims of persecution and predictions of extermination cannot be taken seriously.

*********

Jews all around the world answered Untermeyer’s call for war against Germany. Bernard Baruch, another powerful American Jewish financier, called for all out war against Germany, even pointing out the benefits to Britain of a such a war.

“I emphasized that the defeat of Germany…and [her] elimination from world trade would give Britain a tremendous opportunity to swell her foreign commerce in both volume and profit,” he said.

Bernard Baruch was a presidential advisor to Wilson, Roosevelt and Truman.

In June, 1934, the Jew Emile Ludwig Cohn, in the French journal, “Les Annales,” wrote:

“Hitler will have no war (does not want war), but we will force it on him, not this year, but soon.”

David A. Brown, National Chairman, United Jewish Campaign, 1934, said:

“We Jews are going to bring a war on Germany.”

Henry Morgenthau, Jewish Secretary of the U.S. Treasury said, in September, 1933:

“War in Europe in 1934 was inevitable.”

In January, 1934, Ze’ev Jabotinsky wrote in the “Natcha Retch,” in Palestine:

“The fight against Germany has been carried out for months by every Jewish conference, trade organization, by every Jew in the world … we shall let loose a spiritual and a material war of the whole world against Germany.”

 

Ze’ev Jabotinsky was an ardent Zionist and virulent anti-Nazi.

In the “Jewish Daily Bulletin” in Palestine on July 27, 1935, Jabotinsky wrote:

“There is only one power which really counts. The power of political pressure. We Jews are the most powerful people on earth, because we have this power, and we know how to apply it.”

The “Jewish Chronicle” of February 22, 1935, reporting on J.E. Marcovitch, the Jewish newspaper magnate in Cairo who virtually controlled the Egyptian press, wrote:

“He had converted the whole Egyptian Press into a real battlefield against Hitlerism.”

Louis Marschalko, Hungarian Jewish [?] journalist and author, wrote:

“National Socialism was condemned to war because it was a system which inevitably made enemies of Bolshevism and world capitalism [both controlled by Jews].”

The French Jewish journalist Paul Dreyfus wrote in “La Vio de Tanger” on May 15, 1938:

“Before the end of the year, an economic bloc of England, Russia, France and the U.S.A. will be formed to bring the German and Italian economic systems to their knees.”

An article in the British journal “Sunday Chronicle” of January 2, 1938:

“￡500,000,000 FIGHTING FUND FOR THE JEWS …

The battle will be fought on the world’s stock exchanges. Since the majority of the anti-Semitic states are burdened with international debt, they may find their very existence threatened. A boycott throughout Europe of their export products by way of the retailer may undermine the present uncertain economic stability of several of the anti-Semitic countries.”

International Jewry justified its war on Germany because Germany was “persecuting” Jews inside Germany, with plans to eventually “exterminate” them entirely. (And today, the Iranians plan to exterminate them.)

Effect of Boycott on the German Economy

Between January and April 1933, Germany’s exports dropped by 10%. As the boycott organized by World Jewry spread, German trade was hit particularly hard and during the first quarter of 1933, Germany’s vital exports were less than half its 1932 trade. The worldwide Jewish boycott of Germany continued relentlessly year after year.

In 1941 the International Conference of Jews held in Moscow called for intensified economic pressure on Germany:

“Jewish brothers of the whole world: Let the holy flame of vengeance burn more and more brightly in your hearts with every hour! Be ready to act at any minute! You must do everything in your power to destroy the economic resources of the fascists, no matter in what part of the world you live. Go among the most vital sections of the death-bringing industries of the Hitlerian hangmen and cripple them with every means at your disposal. Boycott their products everywhere! Struggle together with the noble, self-sacrificing partisans! Develop everywhere a fully effective propaganda for solidarity with, and an active support for the Soviet Union. Mankind wants to be freed of the brown plague. Do your duty in this holy war.”

Edwin Black, Jewish author of “The Transfer Agreement” wrote:

“How many months could Germany survive once the boycott became global, once commerce was re-routed around Germany: The boycotters adopted a slogan, ‘Germany will crack this winter’.”

 

[Add. Image — Edwin Black and his book, “The Transfer Agreement”.]

Jewish Exaggerations are Contradicted by Many

At the same time that international Jewish wailing and kvetching was filling international newspapers, this is what the Englishman, G.E.O. Knight, had to say about what was going on in Germany, in his brochure, “In Defense of Germany,” published in July, 1934:

“My private conversations with Jews [inside Germany] were illuminating. They did not bear out what the British newspapers suggested. Mountains had been made out of molehills; melodrama out of comic opera. The majority of the ‘assaults’ were committed by over-zealous youths, and in nearly every instance consisted of ‘ratting’ unfortunate men who were not particularly respectful of the new regime. Physical harm very little, mental, probably much.”

“This is what I learned from my Jewish friends, who are staying in Germany and have no intention of leaving the country, nor have they ever been asked to leave the country. Those who wish to leave and return may do so at their own pleasure. The laws relating to the freedom of Jews are substantially the same as those of other people.”

“The trouble that has risen has nothing to do with the domiciled Jew, many of whom are still employed by government in various spheres of usefulness. There are about 80,000 undesirable Jews that Germany wants to get rid of for all time, and willingly would she deport them all to Great Britain or the United States of America if the request was made.”

“These are Jews who since the Armistice [1918] have penetrated the country and created a situation that has wrought considerable social and political harm in Germany. Among these undesirables are murderers, ex-convicts, potential thieves, fraudulent bankrupts, white slave traffickers, beggars of every description, and political refugees. Many have come from Baltic states, others from Poland, and not an inconsiderable number from Russia.”

He went on to write:

“Before the revolution of last March [when Hitler and the National Socialists came to power], the Jews in the Reich overran every government department, and enjoyed the highest privileges in every profession and calling. They were the principle organizers of the Communist Party, and became identified with every one of the seventy-two warring political sects in the country.”

“In every way they proved themselves eminently capable businessmen and politicians. Many had grown very wealthy. Nearly every German war profiteer was a Jew; the native German seems to have regarded with feelings of shame and horror the idea of making money out of his country during times of great stress …”

“That one per cent of the population of Germany should impose their rule and culture ― however eminent that culture may be ― on more than sixty-million native born Germans is unreasonable, to use no stronger word …”

“So when the Nazi worm turned, and the services of many Jews were dispensed with, Jewry throughout the world rose in arms and through the medium of the Press here, and public meetings in London and the provinces, denounced the German Government in violent terms.”

“The Germans have assumed control of their country, and for weal or woe they mean to maintain their position. The German people are perfectly entitled to possess what form of government they please; it ill becomes us to dictate to them.”

The Jewish war on Germany caused the Germans to clamp down even harder on Jews living in Germany, which, in turn, produced even shriller wailing and kvetching amongst International Jewry. On September 29, 1933, Jews were banned from all cultural and entertainment activities including literature, art, film, and theater. Hitler had spoken many times about “the endless filth coming out of the Jewish film, theater and entertainment industries,” but also about the insidious Jewish effort to undermine German culture by ridiculing German morals, German values, German traditions, and by their attacks upon Christianity. He was determined to put an end to it. In October, 1933, Jews were barred from journalism and all newspapers were placed under government control. Hitler’s intent was to break the Jewish hold on German institutions and to encourage them to emigrate out of Germany, not to harm them.

[END of Part 11]

______________________________

PDF Notes

* Total words = 12,249

* Total pages = 64

*Total images = 18

*Note: Images not in original book are indicated as “Add. image” (Additional image).

*Text in [square brackets] is not part of the original book.

*Special thanks to reader “mblaine” for providing the text for this book.

======================================

Click to download a PDF of this post (4.2 MB).

The Myth of Germany Villainy – Part 11 – Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany (ver 2)

Click on a link to go to another part:

[Click images to enlarge]

Part 01 — Cover text; About the Author; Preface; Chapter 1: The Myth of Germany as an Evil Nation

Part 02 — Chapter 2: Aftermath of the War in Germany

Part 03 — Chapter 3: The Jewish Factor in the War

Part 04 — Chapter 4: The Russian Revolution of 1917

Part 05 — Chapter 5: The Red Terror

Part 06 — Chapter 6: The Bolshevik Revolution Spreads Throughout Europe

Part 07 — Chapter 7: The Nation of Israel

Part 08 — Chapter 8: Jews in Weimar Germany

Part 09 — Chapter 9: Hitler and National Socialists Rise to Power

Part 10 — Chapter 10: National Socialism vs Communism

Part 11 — Chapter 11: Jews Declare War on Nazi Germany

Part 12 — Chapter 12: The Nazis and the Zionists Actually Work Together for Jewish Emigration out of Germany

Part 13 — Chapter 13: Life in Germany Under Hitler

Part 14 — Chapter 14 & 15: Hitler Begins Reclamation of German Territory; The 1936 Olympics

Part 15 — Chapter 16: “Anschluss” The Unification of Austria and Germany

Part 16 – Chapter 17: Germany Annexes the Sudetenland

Part 17 – Chapter 18: War with Poland

Part 18 – Chapter 19: The Phony War

Part 19 – Chapter 20: Germany invades France – The Phony War Ends

Part 20 – Chapter 21: The Allied Goal? Destruction of Germany!

Part 21 – Chapter 22: Germany as Victim

Part 22 (last) – Chapter 23: Winners and Losers

See also:

The Myth of German Villainy: Author Ben Bradberry Interview — TRANSCRIPT

_____________________

Version History

Version 5: Mar 13, 2021 – Added new Go2 Cover images (3).

Version 4: Mar 24, 2020 — Re-uploaded images and PDF for katana17.com/wp/ version.

Version 3: Nov 11, 2016 — Updated PDF (Ver 2) for download.

Version 2: Nov 9, 2016 — Formatting.

Version 1: Nov 9, 2016 — Created post. Added PDF for download.

[In this friendly and at times amusing interview, Lana Lektoff from Red Ice (Radio 3Fourteen) talks with Evalion on her YouTube video’s that gained over 500,000 views in a matter of a few months.

But it wasn’t long until YouTube shut her channel down because she dared to talk about National Socialism, Hitler and the Alt Right in positive terms while also daring to talk about the disastrous negative power and influence of jews on White societies   —  KATANA.]

Red Ice

Radio 3Fourteen

Lana Lokteff

Interviews Evalion

https://redice.tv/radio-3fourteen/oy-vey-shut-it-down

[Image] Adolf Hitler was TIME magazine’s ‘Man of the Year‘ for 1938. In this case it was  given not as an accolade of support and agreement with his policies but rather for Hitler being the most “influential” man of that year, for “better or worse“, as noted by Henry Luce, the jewish owner of the propaganda magazine, TIME.

[In this very informative audio interview (139 mins — Parts I & II) Henrik Palmgren talks with Dr. Andrew Joyce. We learn of Andrew’s gradual awakening to the Jewish Problem/Question while still at school. Since then he has been led to conclude that organized jewry is behind a genocidal plan to effectively destroy White countries through the importation of non-Whites, among other strategies. He concludes that we all have a duty to fight for White survival by spreading awareness of what is going on to as many people as possible — KATANA.]

_____________________

[In this very informative audio interview (139 mins) Henrik Palmgren talks with Dr. Andrew Joyce. We learn of Andrew’s gradual awakening to the Jewish Problem/Question while still at school. Since then he has been led to conclude that organized jewry is behind a genocidal plan to effectively destroy White countries through the importation of non-Whites, among other strategies.

He concludes that we all have a duty to fight for White survival by spreading awareness of what is going on to as many people as possible.

— KATANA]

_____________________

https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/the-history-of-jewish-influence

Red Ice Radio

Dr Andrew Joyce

The History of Jewish Influence

Part 1/2

Published on Jun 1, 2016

Red Ice Preface

top

Andrew Joyce PhD is a scholar, speaker and writer with academic expertise in immigration, ethnic and religious conflict, and philosophy. Andrew sits on the Editorial Advisory Board of The Occidental Quarterly and is a regular contributor to The Occidental Observer. He also serves the British Renaissance Policy Institute in an advisory capacity and will be producing and editing a new journal for BRPI. He is in the final stages of preparing for publication Talmud and Taboo: Essays on The Jewish Question.

Dr. Joyce joins us for another critical look inside the history and events that continually lead us back to the immense Jewish question. To begin, Andrew highlights his academic journey and how he arrived at tackling the vast obstacles embedded within our propagandized Western history to get to the truth of Jewish influence. We discuss their role during the Middle Ages as middleman merchants in close alliance with the elite powers that be, when the practice of usury transformed the means by which Europe was expanded and consolidated. Andrew explains some misconceptions about Jewish emancipations during the medieval period, many of which were influenced by the weakening of monarchal power and the rise of parliamentary democracy in host nations. Then, we consider how the Jewish proclivity of exploiting weaknesses within the flawed democratic system, their fierce ethnocentricity, and deep fear of being racially and genetically disseminated has compelled them to intensely strategize against gentiles. Andrew talks about the cycle of greed within the monarchy system that led to numerous Jewish expulsions and the clever maneuvers that repeatedly brought them and their money back into the untouchable ruling elite fold. We also look at the current calamity of governmental errors driving Europeans to extinction and how Jews have contributed in shaping the demographic suicide of the West.

In the members’ half, we address the concern that there tends to be an unhealthy obsession with the JQ and how we can study our own weaknesses in terms of damaged ethnic cohesion in balancing this weighty issue. Dr. Joyce stresses that we must find rational ways to communicate to the average citizen how our deprived sense of historical peoplehood coupled with the barrage of guilt inducing MSM and academic programming is leading us to the slaughter. We talk about the great power of face to face persuasion and leading by example, along with using humorous memes and trolling in encouraging our folk to adopt a sense of nationalistic pride. Then, Andrew illuminates how Jews have used a backdoor trial and error approach to slowly infiltrate special interest groups aiming to clamp down on freedoms to criticize detractors, and we look at what a massive cultural shift might look like if Whites can employ that same diligence in reversing the pathologically blind response to their destruction. Further, we discuss the immense responsibility that lies in safeguarding the inheritance of our future generations, which ultimately requires a strong ethnic brotherhood standing in radical resistance to the invading cultures that have no place within our own. At the end, we get into the idea that everything happening now with the push for multiculturalism in the West is just history repeating itself, and if we are to reverse this creeping genocide we must bring more awareness, raise the stakes, and adapt an attitude of total success.

CONTENTS

Part 1

Red Ice Preface

Introduction

How Joyce Came to Be Writing About Jews

Schindler’s List

Migration and Ethnic Conflict

Our History About Jews is Written by Jews

Discovering Kevin MacDonald’s Work

Contacting MacDonald and Writing for the Occidental Observer

Official View of Jews as Victims

Jews as Tax Farmers, Money Merchants in the Middle Ages

Wipe Your Mind of Any Preconceptions of Jews in History

How Jews Gained a Foothold in Europe

The “Emancipation” of the Jews

Frederick the Great of Prussia Made the Jewish Community Liable for Fraud

Jewish Emancipation and the Rise of Parliamentary Democracy

Why We Should View Jews as a Group?

Jews are The, “Groupiest Group That Ever Grouped!”

Jews Fear Mixing and Vanishing Genetically

Jews are All Times Strategisers, at All Times Tacticians

Jewish Expulsions Throughout History

Jewish Exploitation and Exclusivity

Opposition from Nobility, Clergy and Peasants

The Cycle of Expulsion of Jews and Their Return

Jews Thrive Under Very Strong Government and a Weak Population

Why Should We Concern Ourselves with Jewish Ethnic Interests and Power?

People of European Descent Face Demographic Catastrophe

Poisonous Jewish Intellectualism and SJWs

The “Refugee” Invasion

Our Land is Not Ours Anymore

British Renaissance and TOO

Sudden Enthusiasm for New Groups and Movements, Trump

Hubris vs 2,000 Year Problem

Trump Not in Jewish Play Book

“Talmud and Taboo” Book

See Also

PDF Download

Version History

PART 2

[Separate post]

Red Ice Preface

Introduction to Part 2

A Need for a More Objective View About Jews

Avoiding the Obsessive Paranoid Approach to the JQ

Jews as Demonic, or as Supernatural Beings?

Jews Work Very Hard at Gaming the System

Jewish Exaggerations and Propaganda

Pseudo-Science from Jewish Academics

The Teaching of History is Dying Particularly the Nationalistic Element

Television and World War Two History

Although People Are Poor on Facts, They Are Rich in Indignation!

The Nature of “Reading” Has Changed

Jewish Atrocity Propaganda Dominates

We Need to Really “Evangelize” for Our Cause and for the Truth

Adopting an Unsentimental and Hard Perspective is Sometimes Needed

Communicating Our Message

Younger Generation’s Use of Humour with Things Like the “Holocaust“

It’s Time to Adopt Many Different Tactics

The Jewish Introduction of Hate Speech Laws in Britain

Jews Are Persistent about Getting Their Way

Jews Behind Race Relations Legislation

The Jewish Dominated National Committee for Commonwealth Immigrants

Brittan and Rifkind’s Public Order Act That Banned Racial Harassment

Sidiq Khan, the Muslim Mayor of London

London, a Multicultural Hellhole

Many More Kahns to Come

The Personal Individual World of the Average Citizen Has Shrunk

As the Situation Gets Worse It May Not Get Better for Our Cause

Be Prepared to Be Surprised

We Must Act If Our Children and Grandchildren Are to Be Spared a Horrific Future!

Every White Country in the World is Being Flooded

You Wear the Uniform of Your Race, in Your Skin

Why This Has Been Done to Us?

Jewish Security was the Primary Motivation in Early Twentieth Century

Post World War Two Jewish Drive Towards Genocide of Whites

“The Last Whites of the East End”

Wrapping Up

I Do Think That We Will Win

See Also

PDF Download

Version History

TRANSCRIPT

(66:45)

[00:00]

Introduction

top

Henrik: Welcome, this is Red Ice Radio. I’m Henrik. I hope you have had a good day so far. Thank you for tuning in. It’s always a pleasure to have you with us. We have some good company over the weekend. Some friends that came for a visit and we decided to take Monday off. A much needed break, since we seldom take them, and extend the weekend a bit and charge up the batteries, as we are gearing up to start our new live show, exclusive for members, this coming Saturday. So definitely don’t miss that! Information and details, will be on Red Ice Members dot com slash live. We also put some details on the main site to Red Ice dot tv. Just go to forward slash live, or click on upcoming stream at the top of the site, or from the menu if you’re on a mobile device.

Switching over to today’s show we have Dr Andrew Joyce with us. He’s a scholar, a speaker, and a writer with academic expertise in immigration, ethnic and religious conflict and philosophy, and sits on the editorial advisory board of The Occidental Quarterly, and is a regular contributor to The Occidental Observer. He also serves the British Renaissance Policy Institute, in an advisory capacity and will be producing and editing a new journal for them. He’s also in the final stages of preparing for publication of his book, “Talmud and Taboos: Essays on the Jewish Question”.

And that’s what we’re going to talk about here today.