Joel Davis: Okay, we should be live. It is the 4th of July, so if we’re in America, it would be Independence Day. But Obviously in Australia, 4th of July doesn’t mean anything. And interesting show for you tonight, I hope. Big show for you this evening, even though we are missing Blair. There’s a lot I wanted to break down, a lot I wanted to discuss. Blair’s sick, so I gave him the night off and decided to ride solo for this one.

 

So, yeah, you’re going to be getting two hours of me yapping, but presumably that’s what you’re all here for. So, sorry, I don’t have any Blair to kind of break it up. But it is what it is. The man’s sick. I think Mark Collett made him get out of bed early the 4 o’ clock in the morning or whatever for a Mark Collett stream the other day. And it kind of tipped him over the edge. It is winter down here in Australia and so he’s a bit under the weather.

 

But yeah, there’s a few big stories I wanted to touch tonight. The main thing I wanted to do, I’ve been doing a bit of a deep dive into Chinese politics lately and the last few days because there’s a lot of very interesting kind of subtle dynamics going on there. And it’s really interesting precisely because the timetable for potentially World War III kind of hinges upon Chinese politics. And that has massive implications for Australia, for America, for the world. So it’s hard to get good information and to kind of break through all the propaganda on both sides and figure out what’s happening because of the nature of the Chinese system. But I’ve done a considerable amount of reading and study.

 

And so I was going to set out my preliminary analysis this evening for all of you to kind of like red pill you on recent developments in China and what’s potentially happening and what to look for over the next few months as more signs will become evident as to what direction things are going at in Chinese politics where potentially, yeah, a lot hinges on kind of what happens over the next few months.

 

But before I get into that, there’s a few other stories. There’s a shocking story here in Australia with this, I think probably the most egregious child rape paedophile allegations I can remember in Australia. So there’s probably been something worse over the years, but I just don’t remember anything as bad as this. I pull this up here from The Noticer:

 

“Homosexual childcare worker charged with raping eight babies and toddlers. A homosexual child care worker has been charged with sexually abusing babies and toddlers at a child care centre in Point Cook, Melbourne. Alleged child rapist Joshua Dale Brown, 26, was arrested on May 12 and charged with 70 child sex offences against eight children aged between five months and two years old at Creative Gardens Early Learning centre, Point Cook between April 2022 and January 2023. The charges included sexual penetration of a child under 12, sexual assault, sexual activity in the presence of a child, possess child abuse material for use through a carriage service and possess child abuse material. Brown, who appeared with pink and blue dyed hair in a Facebook photo with his boyfriend during the same time period he worked at the Point Cook centre, had no criminal record and had a valid working with children check. It has since been cancelled.”

 

“Victoria police said on Tuesday they are now investigating whether there are more victims as Brown worked at 20 child care centres around Melbourne between January 2017 and May 2025 and are examining evidence of an allegation at a second centre at Essendon. The alleged child sex predator appears in a photo at that centre shared on its Facebook page on March 21st for so-called Harmony Day with the caption, quote, ‘today we recognise Australia’s cultural diversity’. Brown also tested positive for a sexually transmitted disease and authorities have contacted the families of 1200 children who attended the same child care centres to urge them to get tested. The alleged paedophile first appeared in court in May, but a suppression order issued by Magistrate Michael White and applied for by police and the Office of Public Prosecutions meant the case could not be made public at the time.”

 

“But as the investigation has developed in scale, the need to notify more than 2, 600 families as a precaution became apparent. Suppression order was therefore revoked and police announced the charges and made the unusual decision to release the alleged child rapist name.”

 

Yeah, anyway, you can go read the whole thing on Noticer. I mean I read most of it, but I mean horrific! And look at, he’s gone to so many different child care centres. He’s flip-flopping around doing days at all these different child care centres.

 

And so now thousands of parents have to get their children tested for STDs. This is beyond fucked up! Like it’s actually like it’s hard to even believe this is even real from my point of view. Like it’s hard to, I mean I’m not denying that it’s real. It’s obviously real, but it’s hard to fathom. It’s hard to come to terms with that this is real, this is happening. And there’s a lot of obvious things that one could say about this. Right? You know, I’ve heard calls for:

 

“Oh, we need to ban men from working in child care centres!”

 

Probably not the most unreasonable thing in the world, but, like, wouldn’t that break, like, discrimination laws? The kind of contradictions of the system are kind of being shown up there. You know, obviously gay dudes, highly disproportionately paedophiles. That discussion has been opening up.

 

[06:20]

 

But I think the real discussions that are important here and that are pertinent here, are these. Number one, nobody in Australian politics with any kind of power or influence, no major political party is calling for the death penalty. This guy is raping kids. Some of them haven’t even turned one. This guy is raping children that young in a systematic, predatory way and filming it. He needs to die! Like, I don’t. Who’s going to come and debate me on this subject? Who’s going to offer the counter argument, no, we need to keep this guy alive. For what reason?

 

Pedophiles need to be executed. But particularly it’s a case like this. I mean it’s. How is it even, … Why the fuck did we get rid of the death penalty? And it’s just putrid that we have to breathe the same air that this scum breathes. It’s unacceptable. It’s an insult to the honour of our nation that someone can commit crimes like this against our children and stay alive. He needs to die! He needs to be put to death. Obviously the system won’t do that. And I’m seeing barely anyone call for this.

 

When we launch our political party. This is going to be one of key items on our platform. I think this is a message, a national conversation that we need to have. I think pretty much everyone in Australia agrees we need to put child rapists to death.

 

So that’s going to be one of the key issues I think that we’re going to attack, because we just need a far more serious response.

 

I mean, there’s too many cases. I mean, this person hasn’t been caught before, but there’s been too many cases of child rapists that have gone to jail, served short jail sentences, where they get held in protective custody so the other prisoners don’t kill them, released back into the community and then reoffend.

 

I mean, how is this even happening? How are we ever releasing someone who is a child rapist back onto the street ever! Like that’s just insane! That’s insane! It begs the question, the people making these decisions, why are they so lenient? Is it because they themselves are engaging in this kind of behaviour? Why are politicians not doing anything about this? Is it because they themselves are engaging in this kind of behaviour? It really does beg the question. Why else would you try to protect paedophiles unless you are one yourself, or you’re working with them in some systematic way or somethings surely this is something that we can all agree on. Left-wing, Right-wing. It’s just disgusting!

 

I mean, second thing that I also would like to say about this is another key policy that we’re going to be putting forward in this country. We have the child care rebate. Now I’ll look into this. Actually, I’ll look it up right now. How much is the average child care rebate a year for working mothers in Australia? Looking it up right now. So there’s child care studies, subsidies.

 

So the child care subsidy percentage decreases as family income increases. For instance, families earning up to 80,000 may receive up to a 90% subsidy, while those earning above $530,000 a year are not eligible. So what it’s saying here is, basically if you earning like an average wage, the government basically pays for your kid to go to childcare. If you’ve got children under school age. Why are we paying? Like if the mother of the child literally can’t afford to pay for child care, why are we subsidizing that? Why don’t instead of paying mothers to dump their kids at like random child care centres run by foreigners infested with paedophiles so they can get raped? How about instead of that, we pay that money to mothers to stay home and take care of their own children.

 

In society today you can be moralistic about it. Mothers should be taking care of their own children. And I agree with that. But obviously economically it’s quite difficult today to have stay at home mothers. You know, it’s difficult to raise a family on one income and for many reasons related to cost of living.

 

So what’s the number one thing that we could do if we want to increase the birth rate and protect children, pay mothers to stay home! I think that’d be an incredibly popular policy. Popular with women and with men. Right? Most men would like their missus to stay home and take care of the house and take care of the kids. The state should pay. That’s a social good. The state should pay for it. Taxpayers, I’d rather pay my taxes so that White mothers can stay at home raising White babies, then paying child care subsidies so they can go and work and send their kid off to some like, paedophile rape centre. So we can protect the kids. We can get the mothers back in the homes so the kids are raised properly. People will have more children because women, won’t be as busy with their careers. They’ll be able to have more children, feel more comfortable to have more children, be incentivised to have more children because they’ll probably get bigger payments the more children they have.

 

And then we won’t need immigration anymore to expand the population. I mean, it’s just a beautiful policy. Everyone wins. It’d be an expensive policy, but we’ve got like 15% of the country on NDIS, the disability insurance scheme. Most of them are rorting it. Most of them are capable of working and just have like a diagnosis, like a bullshit, like psychology diagnosis to allow them to just grift off the system. Got all these like immigrants that come here from the Middle East and just sit on Centerlink grift off that. So many people are grifting off this system. If we shut down all those grifts and redirected that money to young White mothers to have White babies. I’d much rather they be the ones grifting. I’d much rather reproduction be the grift. A lot of people say:

 

“Oh, how are you going to get women to vote for Nazis? How are you going to get women to vote for nationalism?”

 

I think this is a pretty fucking good policy that we can get their votes on, but men as well. We want to be able to bring back the Australian dream, raising a family on one income.

 

[12:56]

 

So I think this issue here really just illustrates how great policies like this just don’t exist in the political system. Like, no one’s really interested in trying to fix the major social problems of our time that have very simple solutions that no one talks about, no one thinks of, that would be 90% of the country behind you, popular. So I think we can really do some damage in a political system like this, presenting these kinds of ideas to the people.

 

I think a lot of people are going to be very pleasantly surprised:

 

“How come the Nazis have such good policies? What the fuck!”

 

And yeah, we can hopefully move the debate onto our terms. And yeah, but I mean, just disgusting the story. I mean, what else can you say about it? We just got to kill this fucker. We’re not advocating for to do anything illegal, but he needs to be legally executed, anyway.

 

Another I’m not going to go into another issue. I’m going to focus on this China thing because there’s a lot to unpack.

 

So basically what I’ve been looking into lately is there’s been a lot of rumours swirling that President Xi Jinping in China is, his power is being curtailed, basically. That his grip on power is significantly slipping, that other elements within the Chinese Communist Party are reasserting themselves. And there’s many reasons why people are suspecting this. And I heard this at first months ago and I suspected it was Western propaganda and the type of thing you hear all the time:

 

“Oh, Vladimir Putin is going to drop dead, he has cancer, he’ll die within six months!”

 

Or you hear these kinds of stories all the time, but very rarely does anything materialise. So I didn’t really look into it too much because I kind of dismissed it as typical Western propaganda. But after taking a serious look at what these people are saying, I think that are calling this out, it does seem that there’s no smoke without fire on this. It does seem like there’s something to there’s been a whole series of purges of high ranking members of the PLA, the Chinese military, of generals appointed by Xi, that was, Xi loyalists that have been taken out, whether they’ve died, been in prison, disappeared from public life, been forced to step down, what have you. A very large amount of these things have occurred.

 

There’s been more critique on Xi’s policies in Chinese major publications, particularly his policy on Taiwan, but also his economic policies. And yeah, the Chinese economy isn’t doing so well. They’re hurdling towards potentially a major war with the United States over Taiwan. If they play that situation in a particular way.

 

And so it would make sense actually that certain elements within the party would maybe try to assert themselves at this time. Apparently rumours were, because basically the way that the Chinese system works, every five years you have, they have like a big, you know, general meeting, like conference where all the members of the party come together and like all the senior members of the party and like vote on the direction of the party and so on. And the last time this happened was in 2022.

 

And I remember at the time it was significant because the previous president, Hu Jintao, was kind of publicly disgraced. Xi kind of ceremonially in front of all the cameras, had him kind of like marched out of the meeting. And he represents like the Communist Youth League faction, which is a faction of more moderate elements within the Chinese Communist Party. Xi’s faction is more nationalistic and militaristic and authoritarian, whereas this other faction is more liberal in the sense that obviously they’re still communists and they’re still like technically and they still support like a one party state, but they support more economic liberalisation, more capitalism, more opening of China to foreign markets, a better kind of better relationship with the United States, a less hostile relationship with the United States, and they want to maintain more kind of stability and diplomacy for foreign policy, economic policy, etc. And Xi kind of won out against them.

 

And then over the years since he became president has made a series of moves to essentially like stack the party with loyalists to him and to his agenda and kind of sideline all these other factions. And leaders of these old factions often get referred to as the so-called party elders now because they once held the highest positions in the party and are very famous in China. And you know, they’ve made note kind of in subtle ways, they don’t explicitly criticise the party or Xi, but in subtle ways they make it known that they don’t approve of Xi’s militarism towards Taiwan and kind of more aggressive and assertive foreign policy.

 

[18:45]

 

But what’s interesting is that at the, as I said, every five years they have a big meeting and then they have what they call plenary sessions, which are their like major meetings that they have once every year or like less than every year, maybe every 10 months or so, roughly speaking, I can’t remember exactly. And it’s kind of like the leaders of the party get together and decide what the direction of the party is going to be.

 

At the most recent of these meetings last year, there were all these rumours that he was sick. There wasn’t very much footage put out by Chinese State media of him really doing anything at the meeting or presiding over much. And it was presented that these party elders, so to speak, that Xi had sidelined were now involved and were talking at the meeting and were, and it was kind of spun:

 

“Oh, Xi is trying to show unity by being graceful and allowing his old fashioned rivals to come and participate in the plenary session.”

 

But in retrospect that seems like a cope, because ever since that plenary session, Xi’s public role has greatly diminished. Recently they just had like a BRICS meeting. He didn’t even go. And there’s been several big events and big meetings where he hasn’t really attended. Many are speculating he has health issues, which is probably part of that.

 

But let’s say he does have health issues. He has no obvious successor. It would make sense that that would undermine him, people’s confidence in him and his agenda. Because if he’s gonna drop dead or become too sick to be president, then the obvious question of, well, who’s going to take over from him comes into play. And it seems like elements within the elite, even though many of them were allies of Xi at one time or another, many of them have turned against him.

 

One of these, according to rumours, top military figures that have turned against him is General Zhang Yuga, which is basically the most senior kind of military figure in China. You know, basically only Xi really outranks him in military matters. He is the Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission.

 

And basically it’s the guy that’s like running the military. He’s kind of getting on a bit. He’s getting old. I think he’s in his 70s, and he was kind of in line to be potentially replaced by generals that were installed by Xi below him. And I can’t remember all the Chinese names. I’m not going to like list off all the names, but basically those guys that were kind of earmarked to kind of succeed him, and everyone was expecting to succeed him, have recently been purged. They’re Xi loyalists, which has kind of been shocking news, and many other high ranking officials across the military.

 

Meanwhile, Zhang Yuga in his public statements on Taiwan is a very different line to Xi. I can break this down a little bit. Xi’s vision on Taiwan, which is kind of nuanced and complex. So since Xi has come to power, his rhetoric on Taiwan has become progressively more and more aggressive. It kind of peaked just before Covid then it kind of let off a little bit, and then once Covid was over, it’s been even more aggressive.

 

So Taiwan, for those who don’t know, according to the official position of the Taiwanese government and the official position of the Chinese government, Taiwan is not a separate country. Taiwan is a part of China, and it simply has a different government.

 

And this is a layover from after the Second World War. You had an alliance between the old Nationalist government and the Communists, where they ceased their civil war and made an alliance to fight the Japanese in World War II. After the Japanese were defeated, they went back to fighting each other. The Communists won. Mao Zedong took over China, established Communist China. And the Nationalists were essentially chased off the mainland onto the island of Taiwan in 1949 or whatever.

 

And at first, the Americans backed the Nationalists against the Communists. This is the beginning of the Cold War, as you might expect. There was even, like General MacArthur, I believe, proposed that the United States should nuke China to try and like, nip Communism in the bud, which probably would have been the right move in retrospect. It was chosen against. There was obviously the Korean War with the Chinese kind of helped North Koreans fight against South Koreans, which were backed by the United States and us and other Western powers.

 

And so there’s a lot of tension there. And there was a view that the Nationalists could maybe somehow get a foothold back in the mainland and take the mainland back from the Communists. And the Americans backed the Chinese government in absentia that basically had formed in Taiwan, that still had ambitions to go and take Beijing back and take China back.

 

But of course, that never materialised. And this was a kind of quasi fascistic, nationalist authoritarian regime that was running Taiwan, but backed by the United States.

 

Fast forward to the 70s when it became clear that the Nationalists were never going to take China back, and the Communist Party had kind of consolidated power. Then President Nixon and his Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, they normalised relations with China and they agreed, because basically they wanted to, during the Cold War, they wanted to basically drive a rift deeper between China and Russia or China and the Soviet Union. They noticed that the Soviet Union and China, even though they were both communist states, they didn’t see eye to eye on a lot of issues. Mao in particular, was very upset after Stalin died. Khrushchev took over the Soviet Union, put out the secret speech basically condemning Stalinism as excessively totalitarian and brutal and so on. He saw this as a betrayal of Communism and of the revolution. Mao, that is, and kind of viewed the Soviets as moderates, as kind of moderates who were infected with bourgeois sensibilities or whatever. And there was territorial disputes between the Chinese and the Soviet Union.

 

[25:31]

 

And so even though they were both communist states that were aligned in many ways, they didn’t see eye to eye. And the Americans saw this as an opportunity to go in there, make a deal with China, make an economic deal with China to normalise relations somewhat, get China hooked on trade with the United States, and therefore neutralise them to isolate the Soviet Union strategically. Obviously this was an effective strategy. The Cold War was over with less than two decades later, the Soviet Union collapsed.

 

But the United States never went back to re-isolating China or didn’t perpetuate the Cold War. Even though the communists were still in power in China. The Americans declared the Cold War was over, Communism was defeated, liberalism had won.

 

And then they adopted a policy of liberal internationalism, a policy that basically, if we just integrate the countries of the world into enough international institutions that are quote, unquote, “liberal” and integrate everyone’s economies with one another through the globalisation of international trade, and we had globalised culture and everyone gets kind of draughted into this Pax Americana-Judeo, global slop of the post Cold War, you know, Pax Americana, international order. The elites of every country in the world will develop so many business relationships and diplomatic relationships and so on with the elites of all the other countries in the world, mediated by America and the West. But they’re all basically just copy and paste liberal democracy into their societies, engage in liberal, democratic reforms. Everyone will become a liberal democracy, and they’ll all sit together at the UN and shake hands and we won’t have any major World Wars anymore. And everyone’s economies will become so interdependent with one another that they won’t want to go to war because their economies aren’t sufficiently isolated that they could take each other on.

 

Instead, they’re so dependent upon trade with other countries that they work out their problems diplomatically and we all sing Kumbaya and everyone’s like a liberal forever. And there’s no more wars and there’s no more evil dictators. And this is the bullshit vision that was put forward.

 

And so even though China was still a communist authoritarian state, the idea was:

 

“Well, if we just let China, we just pretend that the Chinese are cool and allow them to participate in all international liberalism and globalism, then eventually the Chinese elite will adopt liberal ideas and engage in liberal reforms and China will liberalise over time, and we won’t have to fight China and force them to kind of succumb to liberalism. They’ll do it organically.”

 

This was the theory. And it seemed to be kind of working for a time because the Chinese leadership did get progressively more liberal. Every new leader that came in was less and less authoritarian, less and less radical in terms of their Marxist beliefs, more and more open to economic liberalism, opening up Chinese markets. They didn’t, you know, create Democratic, liberal, democratic reforms, but they were more liberal on economics and they were more open on diplomacy. They weren’t very aggressive in asserting their interests on the world stage.

 

And so the Chinese were not viewed as a major threat. And the idea was that if we just make the Chinese and American economies so integrated and dependent upon one another that China relies upon selling cheap crap to the United States and America relies upon buying all these key items from China, this will create a kind of natural friendship and alliance that prevent the two states from going to war.

 

Then along comes the rise of President Xi in the early 2010s, early to mid 2010s. And Xi is a nationalist, Xi is an authoritarian and he had more aggressive views for China’s potential. For Xi the Chinese are the centre of the world. The Chinese traditionally and there’s some truth to this. For a lot of human history, China was the biggest and wealthiest empire on the planet. You know, the Chinese empires existed for literally like five millennia or something in various forms. They’re an ancient people, an ancient civilisation, and there’s 1.4 billion of them.

 

Imagine if all of Europe was integrated into one big like super state. That’s basically what China is in terms of its size and its complexity. And the view was:

 

“Well we’ve become so rich now through all of this economic development that we’ve done that we can invest that money in developing a modern military outfit that can compete with the United States and we can assert ourselves and the United States is falling. The United States has declining internal legitimacy, all these internal problems. We can rise and challenge the American led liberal international order with an assert a different way. And we can assert Chinese interests and try to dominate the Asian region and become the most powerful country in the world and kind of replace the United States as the top dog.”

 

And key to that is taking Taiwan.

 

So why is Taiwan key to it? Well, number one, it’s kind of like a disgrace to China that Taiwan, which they consider to be part of China, is being run by a now liberal democracy.

 

So after the Cold War ended, Taiwan shifted from being a one party authoritarian nationalist state to being a liberal democracy.

 

And so the Kuomintang, the old nationalists that used to run China and that pushed into Taiwan and were running Taiwan under Chiang Kai-shek* and so on, they now had to win an election of the Taiwanese people to hold on to government.

 

[* Chiang Kai-shek-Chinese politician, military leader, and President of Taiwan from 1950 to 1975 (1887–1975) Chiang Kai-shek was a Chinese politician, revolutionary, and general who led the Republic of China from 1928 until his death in 1975. His government was based in mainland China until it was defeated in the Chinese Civil War by the Chinese Communist Party in 1949, after which he continued to lead the Republic of China on the island of Taiwan. Chiang served as leader of the Nationalist Kuomintang party and the commander-in-chief of the National Revolutionary Army from 1926 until his death, during which he was known as Generalissimo. Wikipedia.]

 

[31:58]

 

And by the time you get to the 2000s, they start losing and you get the rise of the Democratic People’s Party or whatever it is, which is basically the Taiwanese libtards. Taiwanese Leftists who advocate for bringing in immigrants into Taiwan, who advocate for gay marriage, who advocate for basically trying to join the West and adopt Western so-called Western, basically like American libtard values.

 

And also each generation that is born in Taiwan, if you look at the polling, they consider themselves Taiwanese more and more and Chinese less and less.

 

So when they started doing polling on this back in the 1990s, the vast majority of the people of Taiwan when they asked them what’s your ethnicity? They said “I’m Chinese”. Now the vast majority of Taiwanese people in particularly young people say “we’re Taiwanese, I’m not Chinese”. And a minority identifies as Chinese.

 

So the Taiwanese have begun to see themselves as a distinct people. They identify with liberal, democratic, so-called western values. And yeah, they keep getting voted back in these Taiwanese libtards. And the Kuomintang who’s like, I guess the Taiwanese Right-wing conservative like Boomer Party, they say:

 

“Let’s not upset China. Like yes, like one day there is only one China and yes, one day we’ll reunify.”

 

But they tried to kind of maintain this perpetual status quo instead the Taiwanese libtards that are in power basically kind of pushing the envelope and getting more, not outright stating like full on Taiwanese independence, but basically almost saying that. And this is a big deal.

 

Like pretty much no country in the world recognises Taiwan as an independent state. Like technically on paper. America doesn’t, Australia doesn’t. Almost no one does because the Chinese have, in order to normalise relations with them, they insist that you have to, you can’t accept Taiwan is a legitimate state. They don’t have a seat at the UN. There are so they’re in a very interesting weird position.

 

And the leaders before Xi, when he took power were kind of conciliatory towards Taiwan. Like:

 

“Yes, as long as Taiwan accepts that there’s only one China and they don’t assert their independence, we’re chill with that. And one day we hope that we can peacefully reunify into like one political system.”

 

But they weren’t really pressing the issue. In the 1990s I believe there was a dispute under the Clinton administration era there was a dispute between China and Taiwan over like I think it was when the Taiwanese held their first Democratic election. I think that the Chinese didn’t appreciate that they preferred the Kuomintang to be in power because I guess they correctly assessed that the Kuomintang was going to be more pro-Beijing than what would come out of democracy, which is a more Westernised, anti-Chinese version of Taiwan. And anyway, strongly opposed the whole election procedure, I think it was in like 1996 or something.

 

And the way that Clinton responded as President of the United States was just to send some carrier strike groups through the Taiwanese straight and say:

 

“What are you going to do?”

 

Basically. At that time, China was so militarily weak compared to the United States that they just had to cuck out and just kind of watch the United States flex on them like that. The elections went ahead and Taiwan became a democracy.

 

Cycle forward to today and China’s way more powerful than it was back then they have invested a lot obviously in building up their navy, their air force, rocket tech, etc. They’re not at the level of the United States, but they’ve closed the gap in a very big way.

 

And after Covid, I remember 2022, I think I remember like Nancy Pelosi, she went to go and visit Taiwan and this caused a big stir because she was like Speaker of the House, so she was like third in line for the American leadership at the time, below the Vice President. And she flew to Taiwan to do a visit and she was the highest Ranking, I think US official to visit Taiwan in like 25 years since the events I just described, I think basically. And the Chinese freaked out and started doing all these military drills and shooting rockets over Taiwan and flying fighter jets all over Taiwan and practicing like invading Taiwan and stuff, doing like live drills with their navy and this kind of thing. Obviously with the intent of, basically freaking the Taiwanese out, saying “don’t take any steps towards independence, like you’re ours, bitch” kind of thing.

 

And Xi, in his public statements on Taiwan or official statements on Taiwan when he first came to power, there were a lot more tame. There was an assertion that Taiwan would be reunified with China.

 

But as time went on into the late 2010s and the 2020s, Xi statements have become more forceful, saying basically that option that we’d like to do it peacefully, but there’s other options on the table. If Taiwan makes a move towards independence, will invade, basically.

 

And anyway, this is a big deal because a war, an invasion of Taiwan isn’t just an invasion of Taiwan. The United States is basically committed to protecting Taiwan. And the reason why they’re committed to protecting Taiwan isn’t just to fuck with China or because they care about Taiwanese democracy, or something. It’s strategic.

 

Basically, if you look at the geography of East Asia, where Taiwan is very key strategic real estate. Because basically all the shipping lanes that connect Japan and South Korea through Southeast Asia, to the Middle East and to Europe all go past Taiwan. If China controls Taiwan, they’re able essentially to more effectively navally blockade Japan and Korea.

 

[38:31]

 

Now, that’s significant because Japan and Korea are highly dependent upon imports by sea. Korea only has a land border with one country, North Korea, which then is connected to Russia and China. So they need access to the sea to have access to the rest of the world, basically outside of Chinese control or North Korean control, which are probably even worse from their perspective.

 

Japan has no land borders with anyone. They have to trade by sea. And Japan doesn’t have natural resources in any substantial number. Japan is utterly dependent upon importing natural resources, even importing food. I believe. They don’t actually have enough agriculture to sustain their population. There’s like 120 million people on that island. They can’t feed them unless they can get ships in and out.

 

Basically, they’re highly dependent upon international trade. So if the Chinese were to navally blockade Japan or Korea, it could bring either of these states to their knees very quickly. They could cause famines. They could completely collapse their economies.

 

So if the United States doesn’t guarantee their security, basically they would be forced to cuck to China. They would be forced to sign a whole bunch of agreements subordinating themselves to China. And that would enable China to become a hegemon over East Asia. They’d have other political and military control over East Asia.

 

And that has massive ramifications, because that would mean Australia’s position becomes precarious. All the other countries in Southeast Asia becomes precarious. A lot of them, the Philippines, Vietnam, a lot of these states would be like a cascade effect. America would lose its ability to have bases. Right now, I think the Americans have like 50,000 personnel or something stationed in South Korea. They’ve still got bases there from the Korean War that they maintain. They’ve got obviously an alliance with Japan. Japan’s the most powerful country in East Asia that America is aligned with. If they lose Korea and Japan, their whole strategic position relative to China collapses.

 

And then all these other states, like I said, would then lose confidence in the United States to defend them. They would also then cuck to China. Maybe even Australia would cuck to China at that point, because there would be this cascade effect. China would become a regional hegemon. China would grow in global prestige. China would then be able to start projecting power beyond East Asia into the rest of the world. It would be a massive shift in global power dynamics.

 

So Taiwan is one little island of like 25 million people, right? It seems insignificant, but it’s not. Because from the Japanese and the Korean perspective, if America is not willing to defend Taiwan, they’re going to lose confidence that they’ll defend them and so on, right? The dominoes go from there.

 

So the United States has to project power in the region. It has to say:

 

“No, these are our regional partners. We will fight to defend them.”

 

Because that’s what holds together the network of alliances that keeps China kind of like locked in, where all the, these island countries and Southeast Asian countries that encircle China, whether it be the Philippines, Vietnam, you know, Indonesia even, and so on, Australia, this whole chain of countries, them all being aligned with the United States, locks China out, basically. They can’t build military bases on their territories. They can’t flex over them diplomatically, politically, and so on and force them to do whatever they want because they’re the big dog. Well, the United States and the Americas can do that they can flex on Canada, they can flex on Mexico, they can flex on all the countries around them because they’re just so much more dominant and powerful. Who’s going to come and defend Mexico against the United States? Who’s going to come and defend Canada against the United States? No one.

 

So America is able to throw its weight around. That’s how China would be able to kind of behave under these kinds of circumstances.

 

Basically, yeah, there’s a whole other series of technical advantages to Taiwan. China doesn’t have, like a deep drop into the Pacific Ocean. So there’s kind of like a, … The Pacific Ocean is very deep, right, like most big oceans are.

 

But as you get closer to China, the undersea kind of ground level, whatever you call that, it raises quite significantly. So when China drop a submarine off the coast of China, it can be detected, because of the [low] depth, by sensors.

 

However, if you drop a submarine off Taiwan, you get this radical kind of cliff drop basically on the eastern side of Taiwan straight into the Pacific Ocean. So in theory, Chinese nuclear subs could, if they control Taiwan, could be dropped off the east coast of Taiwan into the Pacific Ocean and be undetectable to the United States. Meaning the Chinese could sail nuclear subs all the way to the other side of the Pacific without the United States detecting them, because they could sail them at like maximum depth the whole way. That’s pretty serious because they got nuclear subs that would provide first strike capabilities or counter strike capabilities, or whatever, in the event of a nuclear exchange.

 

So there’s a lot of key, like strategic dynamics at play over who controls Taiwan.

 

Also, from the United States perspective, if China was to move on Taiwan, they would be upsetting the regional balance of power, like I said. It would give the Americans an excuse to go to war with China. Because now they’re saying:

 

“We’re just defending Taiwan, we’re defending our allies, right?”

 

And because China would anticipate that, they would probably actually attack Japan, Korea, other states at the same time they attack Taiwan, potentially under certain kind of like war game scenarios, it’s projected.

 

[45:50]

 

So the United States, the argument goes, maybe it’s in their interest to fight China now because if you leave it 100 years or 50 years China could keep developing, developing, developing, developing, and become so militarily powerful that they’re harder to beat 50 years down the track than they are now.

 

So the idea is you kind of bitch slap them now, put them back in their place, because a war with China over Taiwan is far preferable to a war with China somewhere closer to the United States, or a war with China after they’ve already got Japan and Korea and these other states on their side and consolidated power and have grown stronger. And now maybe they’re getting involved in South American politics or they’re getting involved in European politics or Middle Eastern politics or something, and you’re fighting China in another part of the world.

 

The advantage for the Americans of fighting them over Taiwan is that it’s right in China. Basically, it’s right off the coast of China. America can send all their navy, air force, whatever, and just blow up as much in China as they possibly can.

 

And at the same time, they can navally blockade China in Southeast Asia. China is also utterly dependent on international shipping that goes through Southeast Asia to connect it to the Middle East and to Europe. China doesn’t have enough natural resources, resources to sustain itself. It doesn’t even have enough food to sustain itself. It needs to import a lot of stuff. Also, its economy is entirely built around exports.

 

So the US strategy, they don’t necessarily even have to defend the island of Taiwan successfully. They can just blow up a bunch of shit in China, try and blow up as much of China’s military hardware as possible, and then set up a blockade in Southeast Asia that stops China from basically being connected to the rest of the world through shipping, and then wait and watch as China internally kind of destabilises. And win the war that way. That would probably be their strategy.

 

So, however, if you allow China to kind of develop and all these Southeast Asian countries to become allies of China because you didn’t fight them over Taiwan, setting up that naval blockade becomes way more difficult because maybe all those states are now Chinese allies and they’re going to be enemies of the United States. They’re going to allow the Chinese to build naval installations. They’re not going to allow the Americans to bring their navy into their region or whatever.

 

So, yeah, international politics is a confidence game. If all these states have confidence in American power, they’ll back it. If they’ll cuck to China. That’s how it works. So Taiwan is just like this first domino in this chain effect of strategic ramifications.

 

Now, this is significant because ultimately the ball is in China’s court. The United States can’t force China to invade Taiwan. Maybe they could try and convince the Taiwanese to do something suicidal, like declare independence or something and really provoke it, but they can’t ultimately decide what China does. China decides what China does.

 

Now, Xi Jinping, in his kind of aggressive foreign policy, has only really been kind of pushing Taiwan away, making Taiwan fear invasion seem inevitable, getting the Americans to basically see invasion as potentially on the horizon, prepare for a war with China. Trump’s foreign policy is a large aspect of it is really geared towards containing China, like the tariff policies and so on. There’s people in the Trump administration, like Elbridge Colby, I think his name is, and others who are national security advisors who are just like China hawks, who just say that basically everything should be focused on containing China. Fuck Russia, fuck the Middle East, we should just make peace deals and forget about it and just take all of our military hardware, concentrate it in East Asia and get ready to fight China or try and deter China from going to war with us. So that School of thought is developing in the United States because of Xi’s actions.

 

And basically, the longer that the current trajectory of things, or Xi’s basically kind of led trajectory of things continues, the closer and closer World War III gets, basically. So that’s like the strategic context.

 

Meanwhile, Xi had spent years concentrating power, purging rival factions, stuffing the party full of his allies.

 

But then in the last year, you’re seeing a kind of a bit of like a backflip. A lot of his allies getting purged, his public appearances like I said earlier, being curtailed. The tone in the media, he’s getting criticised. Not openly directly criticised but getting indirectly criticised by a lot of people and then other rivals, other old heads basically in the Chinese Communist Party not directly criticising his Taiwan policy but advocating for a far more restrained Taiwan policy in their public statements, including this Zhang Yuga guy who is the 2IC [Second in Charge] over military affairs. Basically the guy running the Chinese military who’s presiding over a lot of these purges that happening to these Xi’s top guys, who basically is the highest Ranking dude in the Chinese military structure.

 

So it’s interesting because what it seems like is that however internal dynamics have been seized its hard to tell from the outside. It seems like there’s been a move against Xi. Not necessarily that he’s going to get replaced as leader although there’s some speculation that he could be literally about to be replaced. That would be very uncharacteristic. Usually they don’t. Someone’s elected to do a five year term that would mean Xi’s term doesn’t end till 2027 that it would continue. But he’s being sidelined. There was an announcement a few days ago that a so-called joint decision making body was being created at the top of the CCP and Xi Jinping, you know, has really kind of pushed for a long time. He is the leader. His interpretation of policy is the prevailing interpretation and China will be strong if basically it subordinates itself to him and his leadership. And that’s the way a lot of the top officials in the Communist Party were talking for years. Now the tone has shifted. Now they’re talking about power sharing and committees of decision makers and how everyone in the party needs to be included like the party leadership in decision making. We need to create more committees and have more what they call Democratic Centralism which basically means there’s one central decision making body but within that body you have democracy. So the Chinese people don’t have democracy but the party leadership collaboratively make decisions.

 

[51:56]

 

So they’re trying to cuck Xi, strip him of his kind of authoritarian power and kind of subordinate him to the other elements within the party. There is a rise in prominence of the so-called party elders who represent this more liberal view that I was describing earlier.

 

And the backdrop of this is also that the Chinese economy is slowing. So my view, Ron Unz put this view forward with some compelling evidence. I remember a few years ago, and I think it makes sense, is that Covid was probably a bioweapon created by an element of the United States government. I don’t know which element, whether it was a rogue element or it was directly under Trump himself ordered it to be done or what, we don’t know, I don’t know exactly. But some element within the US Government unleashed that bioweapon on China.

 

And I think it also had a secondary purpose of facilitating all these economic policy or financial policy actions where basically in the United States the economy was hurtling towards really difficult times. Covid happens they just then flood the market with all of this money to prop it up by basically bailing out all the major companies, all the major banks, basically massive wealth transfer, just giving trillions and trillions of dollars to the American financial elite. That’s basically what they did during Covid.

 

And no one was in the streets protesting it like they were after the global financial crisis because everyone was arguing about vaccine mandates and vaccines and lockdowns and blah, blah, blah, Covid shit! Because everyone was arguing about Covid bullshit, no one was arguing about:

 

“What the fuck! The richest people in the world just stole $15 trillion off us. What are we going to do about it?”

 

Well, no one did anything.

 

And I think that was basically like the psyop. Like they, it was like a sleight of hand. Like we can’t just do another 2008 style bank bailout. So fabricate this bullshit crisis that gets all the goys into this false paradigm, and we’ll have them argue within that space for a year and a half and then once we’ve transferred $15 trillion to the financial elite, we’ll just close the paradigm and then we’ll just pretend like everything’s gone back to normal. Which is what happened! That’s literally what happened!

 

There was no permanent vaccine passports or what. Remember everyone was saying:

 

“If you don’t get the vaccine, you’re going to get put in a camp and vaccines are going to kill everyone!”

 

And all this kind of stuff.

 

And obviously the vaccines were fucked up! I’m very glad I didn’t get one. And who knows what the long term effects of those things are going to be. It’s kind of scary to think about. But I think a lot of the catastrophe, the kind of catastrophism that many people had, has been shown to be false because everyone hasn’t dropped dead. There’s some evidence that it’s had an impact on fertility. I saw a study recently that about a third. It’s got like a 33% drop basically in the fertility of women who got the vax versus the ones who didn’t. Something like that, which is significant.

 

But I don’t know. I didn’t read the study closely enough to know if it was controlled for the fact that a lot of the women who didn’t get the vax are also quite conservative. So wouldn’t they be more like as a demographic, be more likely to have more children? Because you know, when I think about the kind of women I know they didn’t get the vax. Usually they’re very Right-wing, very conservative, very traditional. A lot of Christians didn’t get the vaccine because they thought it had something to do with the mark of the Beast and the book of Revelation. People who are into conspiracy theories, people who are in the dissident Right who listen to Right-wing memes. We’re the kind of demographic that didn’t get the vax, the non-conformist types. Well, we’re also probably a demographic that are more likely to have kids at higher rates because we kind of reject the mainstream programming, eat healthier, have more traditional values and so on.

 

So I don’t know if that’s all it is. Just like the vax was predominantly taken by people that are libtards and normies and they just got a lower birth rate than Right-wingers, or if there’s something actually in the vax that’s causing the fertility issue. But whatever the case may be, the consequences don’t seem to have been as catastrophic as what people were saying.

 

So while they had you arguing about that, this is what they were doing.

 

[56:35]

 

But I also think part of why they released Covid specifically in Wuhan in China is in order to basically try and slow down the Chinese economy. Because prior to Covid, the Chinese economy was growing at breakneck speed. It was growing like two or three times as fast as the United States economy and had been for decades. So China’s flying and they’re building up their military power. Xi is in power. He is the strongest leader since Mao, most consolidated authoritarian leader since Mao. Militaristic, nationalistic, getting more and more aggressive on Taiwan, more and more assertive in the world.

 

Something needed to be done to slow this mother fucker down! Boom! Covid! Drop Covid in China. What happens to Asians when they think that there’s a disease happening? They freak the fuck out! I remember like it was all the Chinese that bought all the toilet paper and stuff when Covid broke out and you couldn’t get toilet paper for months, it was a nightmare because Asians are hyper anxious people and Asians would always wear masks whenever they get sick, even before Covid. That’s part of their culture because Asians are bug people who live in giant cities full of millions of people. Disease spreads very easily in Asian societies and so they’ve culturally adapted to be more threat avoidant and neurotic about diseases than White people because we don’t live in the same kind of environments on average.

 

So it’s also why conservatives and people who live in the countryside were less freaked out than inner city like libtard cosmopolitans because they’re more like Asians. They live in these kind of more clustered environments where they have contact with more humans per day and so they’re more neurotic and so on about these things.

 

But anyway, the point is that you drop a disease like that in China, it’s going to shut down the economy. And it did that very effectively. China’s economy still hasn’t recovered from Covid, like their official figures still look kind of decent, but if you really scratch beneath the surface and you look at the underlying numbers, the Chinese economy hasn’t recovered from Covid. It’s actually slowed down to about the pace of the United States economy in terms of its growth. And yeah, there’s a lot of structural problems with the Chinese economy. Like you can see they’re claiming publicly that the economy is growing at 5% and everything’s fine. But youth unemployment is high. And look at the underlying numbers.

 

Like if you look at prices, house prices, industrial goods prices and so on, these prices are stagnating or falling, which indicates a lack of demand. So it means people don’t have money, businesses don’t have money, people don’t have money to buy houses, to invest in expanding business operations, whatever.

 

So that shows that there’s some structural problems inside the economy. You know, in China, it’s hard to trust any statistics that come out of China because there’s all these incentives to lie because they, everything’s managed by central committees and those central committees are assessed based upon these metrics. So of course they’re going to lie about the metrics to make themselves look better. And everything in Chinese, you know, culture is about saving face and not appearing weak, not appearing incompetent or whatever.

 

So I think it’s quite clear the Chinese economy has slowed down. Covid was very effective in doing that. It slowed down international trade, which China’s dependent upon. It also just literally caused all these lockdowns all through China that went on for ages. That this like zero Covid policy that persisted for a long, very long time. Their lockdowns went on longer than any other country. They were still doing lockdowns I think in 2022, when everyone else was open and back to normal. So that really fucked them up. And there’s a lot of evidence that the Americans released it.

 

Like for example, the so-called Wuhan lab where this thing was built was literally funded by Bill Gates, right? He’s a fucking American! And Anthony Fauci was like working there. Like, what’s going on?

 

Also they had the World Military games in Wuhan at the same time that Covid was broke out or was released or whatever. We know that it was a genetically engineered disease. Okay, that’s kind of quite something like the World Military Games. So like US military people were there was like 600 guys or 800 guys from the US military in Wuhan at the time when it was released.

 

So the US had people there that could have released it. And you know, there’s a lot of links to people that have links to the ruling class in America. So you know, why would, if the Chinese created a bioweapon, why would they release it in their own country? Wouldn’t you release it in someone else’s country? Like who releases bioweapons in their own country? Like that’s insane!

 

Also there were suppressed reports at the same time that it was released in Wuhan that Covid spontaneously was also released in Iran and in Russia, but it was never reported on in Western media. They just only focused on the Chinese release. That’s kind of interesting. Like the other two, like major American geopolitical enemies or whatever.

 

So yeah, I think that there was something nefarious that went on there. I think it was intentional. It’s beyond a shadow of a doubt that Covid was biologically engineered. Like that’s just confirmed at this point.

 

So the question is, who released it? Would China release a bioweapon in their own country that ended up fucking up their own economy? Or would America do it? Not only did it fuck up the Chinese economy, it greatly benefited the American ruling class.

 

So think about it. Why would China do that?

 

[1:02:34]

 

But anyway, my point is that all of these dynamics are occurring. You could see why elements within Chinese Communist Party would move against Xi because the economy is stagnating. Xi is a hardliner. Xi wants to isolate the Chinese economy from the rest of the world. Doesn’t want American cultural influence, doesn’t want foreign financial interests coming into China, gaining a foothold in the Chinese economy. Doesn’t want Chinese elites developing too close relationships with people in the West, with Western elites, and becoming disloyal to China. Right. He’s a nationalist, and that’s why he has those views. It makes sense.

 

The elements within China that support liberalisation, that want to have a better relationship with the United States, that don’t want to kind of rock the boat, have a war over, potential World War over Taiwan that could destabilise China irrevocably, potentially. They lose a war like that. Like, it could be over for the Communist Party in China who are right now, you know, elites that are doing well, that are rich, successful, whatever, have good positions in Chinese society. Do they want to go to war with America over Taiwan? Do they feel as passionate as Xi does about these nationalist policies? No! A lot of them don’t. And they make public statements that show that they don’t. So if Xi got sick, showed weakness or this weakness that he has at the moment because the economy isn’t doing so well and so on, maybe they’ve chosen this as the time to move because Xi had consolidated so much power, and that’s why we’re seeing this switch up within Chinese politics.

 

But a lot of this is speculative and kind of reading between the lines on a lot of things that people are saying in China. It will become clearer in the coming weeks and months. I think the next plenary session, the fourth plenary session in China is occurring on, like, August. That’s going to be key, seeing how that plays out, you know how Xi behaves, public statements made by other leading figures and so on, that’ll say a lot about whether Xi has been sidelined or at the very least, radically cucked in how much power he has over the Chinese Communist Party and how much other elements of the party are resurging in power and influence.

 

And based upon that, it’ll completely reset the clock on the World War III clock. Is World War III going to happen? Is a war between America and China going to happen this decade? If Xi manages to hold and reconsolidate power and this is all bullshit! Or he can turn it around? Potentially, yes. This could embolden him to go:

 

“Okay, well, I almost got defeated. Now’s the chance for the power and glory. Defeat the United States. The Chinese century beckons. I’m a great man of history!”

 

Invades Taiwan. Boom! World War III! Or Xi can’t come back from this. He’s been defeated. He’s been internally outpositioned. All these top guys are taken out. He’s basically been undermined, and it’s basically over for the Xi era. If that happens, there’s not going to be a war with Taiwan anytime soon.

 

And obviously, the big Trump tariffs that were dumped on China only exacerbated these problems, and they’ll probably go down as a strategic masterstroke, which future generations look back at this. The key is, as well, there was a recent negotiation between the Americans and the Chinese. I think it was in London or something, over a trade agreement between the United States and China, an agreement to bring down their mutual tariffs on one another and so on. What’s kind of interesting about that, Xi said nothing about it. Zero! Wasn’t involved, hasn’t made one public statement about it. It’s a pretty big fucking deal, you would think.

 

But not only has Xi not said anything about it, nobody in the Chinese government has really stated any substance at all about what was negotiated. But Trump walks away from that negotiation immediately. He is saying:

 

“I’ve secured an incredible deal and we’re going to open China up. And it’s an incredible deal with massive progress and my negotiating team, they’re the best in the world!”

 

Why was Trump so happy and why is China not saying anything? Very suspicious.

 

Some people are suspecting that it’s because basically the faction that Trump negotiated with, it’s not Xi’s faction, it’s the faction undermining Xi. And basically, until they can fully cuck go formally or get him to step down while saving face or something, they’re not going to announce the deal. So what’s in that deal? When that deal gets made public again, that’s going to be a key indication of where China is at. Because there’s no way that Xi, based upon his philosophy, his ideology, would be willing to make any concessions to the United States. You know, he’s a staunch nationalist. Whereas, yeah, other elements in the CCP absolutely would, in order to preserve economic stability, because the Chinese economy is not doing great! And their view is that the way that they gain the support of the Chinese people predominantly is through managing the economy well. They don’t have a democracy, they don’t get voted in, but they say:

 

“Qu hey, look, you don’t get to vote in your leaders. But look at the great job that we’re doing. You know, China’s constantly developing. Everyone’s getting richer, everyone’s getting more opportunities, everyone’s making more money. So don’t rock the boat. Just trust the plan!”

 

Right? And that obviously has worked for a certain period of time, but what happens when it stops working? I don’t think a lot of people in the higher ups in the CCP want to find out what happens, and I think a lot of them don’t want to go to war with the United States. I think they’re afraid, and understandably so, because they could get absolutely blasted! Like, even if they were to win, they would take a lot of damage, and it could basically set back the whole project forever. It could destabilise the Chinese Communist Party’s grip on power entirely.

 

I mean, what if the United States there’s certain dams in southern China that some analysts say if you bomb them, it could cause a flood that could kill hundreds of millions of people! If you do a naval blockade on China, it could cause a famine that could kill hundreds of millions of people! Like, the United States is over 7,000 nuclear weapons like the do you really want to have World War III against the power that’s that powerful? And when you’re that vulnerable? A lot of them probably might view Xi as a madman! And the Chinese are not risk takers. They’re not a nation of Hitlers. They’re not a nation of blitzkriegers. They’re not a nation of poker players. You know, they’re a mercantile race of Art of War, you know, Wu Wei, do nothing, win. That’s kind of like the Chinese, you know, philosophy and mentality is being conservative, being harmonious relations and all this gay shit! They don’t have the Faustian spirit.

 

[1:10:09]

 

So basically what I’m saying is that we’re probably at the on the brink here of total chudjack victory. If Xi loses his grip on power, World War 3 will not happen anytime soon. So that radically kind of changes the calculations. And that actually also, I think, explains why Israel might have decided to kick things off with Iran. The Israelis, they might have gained intelligence that China is weak. And they think:

 

“Well, if we try and escalate things with Iran now, the Americans might have more confidence that the Chinese won’t do shit over Taiwan. And so we can start forcing the issue on Iran.”

 

Basically that’s why they chose to move now, partly maybe because Trump is in power, but also partly because, yeah, maybe the China threat isn’t as imminent as as many previously thought, if Xi’s power is weakened.

 

So anyway, big dynamics, I think, like very complicated, lots of moving parts. But yeah, nothing ever happens. Nothing ever fucking happens! Yeah. Relying on China to move world history, I guess, was a mistake. I mean, think about the kind of people we’re dealing with here.

 

So anyway, I think that’s interesting and important to report because from an Australian nationalist perspective, World War III, if it was to happen, would completely change everything. So we kind of have to have our finger on the pulse of like how, like, are we at Defcon4 or like, where are we at on the, is World War III gonna happen rating scale? Because that’s a massive spanner in the works.

 

I’ll go through a few Superchats. I see Ultra Saxon said:

 

“I’d love to see you guys do a stream with Karl Radl from X. Every post of him is a gem and he’s super informative on National Socialism. Respect from England, lads.”

 

Yeah, Karl, I’ve seen his stuff. I would like to do. I think he’s more of like a Twitter guy. I don’t think he does video streams. I never seen him do a video stream before. Maybe I’m wrong, like, correct me if I’m wrong. But yeah, maybe like a Twitter space or something like it would be interesting too. I think I actually proposed that to him and then I got banned from Twitter. But make an alt account and have a conversation. If he was interested, I’d be down to discuss. Seems like his wheelhouse is World War II history and NS German history. That’s obviously quite interesting. Dan3 said:

 

“There are apparently experts saying that China has less than half their official population using salt consumption and other stats to estimate their population. Don’t know this is whether this is propaganda though.”

 

Oh, you’re saying that there’s some estimates that their population is much smaller than they say?

 

Yeah, I mean, I don’t know about that. I don’t think they’d be able to like lie about something that effectively. But you definitely can’t trust the stats you hear out of China. Megawatts 80 said:

 

“Everyone watching should send a few bucks. Hail victory!”

 

Well, I can’t disagree with that. Sector88 said:

 

“Any opinion on the Yanks reviewing the AUKUS agreement? I don’t believe we’ll be getting the Virginia subs until the late 2000s at best. No matter the a administration, unless they somehow double or triple sub production.”

 

Yeah, it, there does seem to be a great lag on that.

 

But I don’t see them ripping up the AUKUS agreement because at the end of the day it’s in the strategic interest of the Americans for us to have better subs. You know, the current subs that the Australian military has basically not going to last much longer. The old subs, they’re going to be decommissioned. We need to have new subs somehow and we don’t have a programme in place to build our own. The Americans aren’t going to want us to have no subs.

 

Also, we’re paying big money for their subs, so of course they’d like to sell them to us. And the nuclear capable subs are important just purely for the fact that, well, you don’t have to refuel. The nuclear reactor lasts like 30 years or whatever. So that’s an incredible capability where you can effectively just stay at the bottom of the ocean as long as you want. Incredible technology. So from a strategic standpoint it’s vital if we want to assist the Americans in engaging in like a naval blockade against China to have that kind of thing. There’s a reason why the Chinese freak out about AUKUS and they don’t want us having nuclear subs is because nuclear subs are effective as fuck! Like they’re incredible technology, and not that many countries have them. Ultra Saxon said:

 

“Joel, have you ever heard of the concept of a Canzak union? You see the idea amongst normie Libs, but I see it being a great long term geostrategic strategy for reuniting and re empowering the Anglo sphere.”

 

Yeah, I mean in principle I don’t necessarily think it would be so bad, but there’s a few things why I don’t think it’s realistic.

 

[1:15:44]

 

Number one, Canada is basically the strategic bitch of the United States. So being able to deal with Canada as an independent state is unlikely. Also Australia’s main allies, the United States and Britain’s main allies, the United States.

 

So this idea that we could all come together and form a union that was somehow not integrated with the United States is unlikely to be something that the United States would be too happy about. So it would only really happen if there was a massive sea change in the respective politics of our three countries. It’s unlikely that that sea change is going to be the same in all three.

 

So let’s say like nationalists, let’s say like we win in Australia. Is libtard Britain or libtard Canada going to want to make some kind of alliance with us? Probably not. And vice versa. So I don’t see it as super likely.

 

Also, there’s radically different. Like, there isn’t a lot of economic trade between the Anglo-sphere countries. Like Australia trades a lot with them. Like all three trade a lot with America. We don’t trade much with each other. Like the Canadian economy is very similar to Australia’s in the sense it has a lot of minerals and so on. We both need to trade with like manufacturing powers to like, get the most out of our economy. So like, economic integration doesn’t make as much sense as it does in say, Europe.

 

Also, we’re geographically quite isolated from one another in different regions of the world.

 

So I think, yeah, the argument is, oh, but we’ve got similar culture, similar forms of government, good relations, similar heritage. Yeah, okay, like, but why does that mean? Like, what would the union be? Just like a union where like, we’re already in a military alliance with one another, basically. Like Canada and Britain are both in NATO. Australia’s not in NATO, but we’re like a NATO partner or whatever. So like, what would it really do? Like freedom of movement? Again, like say, like we take power in Australia as nationalists. Do we want to have freedom of movement with Britain and Canada? No, because then they’re going to like flood Australia with nons. I’d rather just have an immigration policy that takes White people from those countries. So yeah I don’t really see what like the point of Canzuk Union is like from a strategic standpoint. So I don’t really see it happening.

 

But like, let’s say we took power in Australia, we would look to take over New Zealand. As well, that’s undoubtedly true. And then we would probably look to support nationalist forces in Britain as best we could. And then if we that was successful, then we’d form an alliance on those terms. Be very different than the Canzuk Union.

 

Then, like, let’s say, like our guys are running Australia and Britain and there was this idea of getting the empire back together and building an imperial federation that fuses the two countries. We could look into it down the track.

 

But yeah, it would be difficult probably because at that point, like the Australian identity, the British identity had diverged so much at that point. We’re on opposite sides of the planet, completely different strategic objectives. Like is Britain going to want to fight to the death to defend Australia’s geopolitical interests and vice versa? You know, maybe they are, maybe they aren’t. But that’s usually you get those kinds of alliances between countries that border each other. Dan3 also said. Oh no, I already read that.

 

Modern World Reject, he just hailed! Awesome! Hail you. Modern world reject said:

 

“How World War III affect nationalist politics in Australia?”

 

Well, if it was to happen, massively! Number one, the regime here would have to completely change its attitude on racism. You know, they would basically have to allow anti-Chinese racism in society because they would have to find a rationale basically to either mass incarcerate or mass deport almost, 2 million Chinese people that live in Australia. There’s about one Chinese person for every 10 White people in Australia. Like that’s how you gonna go to war with China and just allow them to walk around and be, hold high ranking positions in society and trust them like it’s not feasible. Also if you want to fight a war you need patriotism.

 

So you’re gonna have to wind back the woke shit, allow people to be kind of racist. If you’re going to want to try and convince young White Australian men to fight a World War, you can’t keep flooding their country with foreigners. You can’t keep pushing the current like ridiculously woke anti-White agenda down their throats. They won’t fight for you! They won’t sign up. So there would have to be a completely new deal made. Like the government would have to make a lot of concessions to us.

 

And I think after the war everything would be radically different. I think after a war like that, it would become defining in world history, in Australian history. The memory of World War II would fade and the whole paradigm of the post World War II international order would collapse. And it’d be a Great Reset basically. Not in the kind of Claus Schwabian sense, but it’d be like a full reset basically of ideologically, historically and so on.

 

[1:21:40]

 

And ultimately if Australia came out of it intact, I think it’d be good for nationalism. I think nationalism would grow in a post World War III Australia much more quickly and more forcefully than you know, in the current order. It’d be a great shake up, a great reality check.

 

Megawatt said:

 

“Touch on the SA political donation laws. Will this go national?”

 

I have to read up on it first. Not too aware of South Australia’s political donation laws. Rygo Weber said:

 

“Joel, will you or Blair be running as Senators in the next election? I think you would be quite effective. Thanks for the show.”

 

Yeah, we’re looking at doing something like that. Obviously we’ve got to launch the party. It’s a long time to the next federal election. You got to decide what we want to do with the state elections that happened before then. So exactly how it all fits together is a bit open ended because there’s a long way between now and then. There’s a lot to consider. Yeah, we’re gonna have a crack.

 

What else we got here. On Entropy Racist Aristocrats, he said, this is directed at Blair after last week:

 

“Blair, when Joel violates liberal norms, for example, equating the desire for a White man to marry an African with marrying a dog. Why the knee jerk reaction to sheepishly moderated. Who are you hoping to placate? Seems rather inexplicably explicably discordant.”

 

Okay, well that’s kind of funny. Says here:

 

“Joel, Cameron McGregor has a worthwhile fourth turning influence. Take positing America and Australia, by inference remains in the adolescent stage of development. He’s a coming war of reintegration of the state and national White Identity driven polarisation, catalyzing White unification and ending pluralism and disintegration. He sees Whites awakening to race, the jewish question and distrust of modern capitalism as preconditions for state transition to adulthood. You two could have a fruitful chat.”

 

Well, I don’t know who that is, but sounds good. So if he’s out there, he wants to get in touch. By all means, yeah.

 

I will say another couple things, another couple things that have been on my mind this week that are interesting to observe. So whilst you’re seeing these big kind of moves in China, behind the scenes shifting of power in America, you’re also seeing an interesting dynamic emerge where I remember when Musk and Trump had a falling out, they then kind of patched things up and I said I don’t see this lasting. Well, I think I was correct about that. Musk has been very vocal over the past week in his opposition to the so-called Big Beautiful Bill. And there’s reports that he’s going to fund Thomas Massie, who is the Israel critical Republican, the only Republican that’s not taking money from AIPAC or whatever. He’s going to fund his primary campaign because Trump is backing his opponent because Trump hates Massey because Massey’s basically not going along with the Zionist agenda.

 

So that’s interesting to see that Musk is going to step in and take Massey’s side and drive this kind of wedge between using the Israel issue to drive a wedge within the Republican Party.

 

Because as I said, Musk’s position is awkward in American politics because he’s completely abandoned the Left. The Left hate him! The Left maybe hate him more than Trump because he’s said and done maybe things that are more radical than what even Trump has done. Well, just objectively are like he’s throwing Romans and kind of statements that he’s made. But also he didn’t successfully win over Republicans. Musk is awkward, he’s a nerd. He’s not even American. And he’s kind of like a [word unclear] to Trump’s movement. Trump has organic charisma. He’s a real American. He’s beloved by the people and he’s the president.

 

So the average, you know, red blooded, Right-wing American sides with Trump against Musk. And also Trump doesn’t see himself as beholden to Musk. He sees Musk is below him in the hierarchy. Doesn’t matter how many hundreds of millions Musk kind of threw at him. Musk wasn’t able to get what he wanted out of Trump. He wasn’t able to get what he wanted out of MAGA, if you will.

 

And so now Musk is in political no man’s land. He’s the richest man in America on paper. He is entirely dependent his business models basically on American government subsidies. So he needs political power on his side. But he’s alienated both major sides of politics. So what do you do in a situation like that? Well, if you’re the world’s, world’s richest man on paper, you’re probably going to try and fund a third faction into existence. And that’s what you see his early moves.

 

So I could see Musk making bigger moves going ahead and it could be a real kind of I don’t like Musk in the sense that he, any kind of like pro-White stuff that he said to try and like win us over, he kind of like showed his true colours on the H1B Indian saga where he sided with stuffing America full of Indian H1B Visa types as opposed to preserving the White majority.

 

So that shows where he stands slike he’s not truly loyal to us or our concerns.

 

But nevertheless, when you see inter elite competition, it’s a good thing. It means that there’s dynamism in politics. It means it opens up opportunities for dissidents because you’re probably going to get more free speech, more open exchange of ideas, more dynamism in politics if you have two rival factions on the Right competing for the approval of the Right-wing masses. And what Musk showed through that whole H1B Visa saga is that he does care about maintaining a positive public image and that he has political ambitions.

 

[1:28:31]

 

So it could be a real challenger to like the Peter Thiel Donald Trump network. J.D. Vance, you know, is the heir apparent to Trump as president. If Musk can find a candidate that’s capable of taking on Vance, Vance is going to have a real challenger with hundreds of millions behind him. And I said before, if Tucker Carlson wanted to run for president against J.D. Vance, for example. I think Elon Musk would give him hundreds of millions of dollars and I think he’d beat J.D. Vance.

 

So that’s a situation to monitor as well. Big dynamics in America and China, like deep politics, elite politics that could really define what direction the wind is going to flow, going to blow over the next few years and kind of define the next decade or generation in international politics.

 

So that’s something that I noticed as well, something to keep an eye on. But an issue that I wanted to discuss as well, to kind of end the show, I guess, is I’ve got a Superchat coming. I’ll read a couple of these and then I’ll discuss this. Rabbi Shlomo Noisberg said:

 

“A hundred dollars. What do you need $90 for? I’m not going to give you an $80 Superchat to a racist, anti-semite. That $70 is mine. All right, fine, I’ll give you $60. But this is not a gift, it’s a loan and I want interest.”

 

Well, you’re not getting interest. I don’t even know who the hell you are. Dad3 said:

 

“Do you think the English will have a great man like Hitler and Napoleon in a few decades after the Civil War? Maybe three original Germanic great powers are supposed to have one after a disaster!”

 

I want to know what kind of question that is.

 

Yeah, I think that’s all the Superchats, but yeah, like one thing I want to discuss is the issue of settler colonialism. There’s been a lot of discussion precipitated, I think, by anti-Israel discourse. There’s been a lot of discussion on the Right. The dissonant Right. About the issue of settler colonialism. And there’s basically two major schools of thought. One is we should oppose ourselves to the idea of settler colonialism and talk about jewish supremacy and talk about how Israel is this horrible evil colonial power who’s stealing away land from the Palestinians. And this will help us educate White people on the jews and show that the jews are the bad guys, not Whites, and that Whites don’t want to hurt anyone. And we just want to have our own countries too. And yeah, and we can kind of focus all of the ire that’s directed against imperialism and colonialism and so on against jews and that this would be in our interest.

 

And sometimes these people say if you don’t agree with this, you must be jewish or Joel is a secret Zionist because he doesn’t agree with us.

 

The other position, my position, is that we should oppose Israel on the basis that Israel is a parasitical and subversive force of zionism, let’s say in general, because it’s not just the state of Israel, it’s also the jewish diasporas that live in our countries. They’re a subversive and parasitical force on our countries, White countries, Australia, America and particular Britain, so on. They’ve completely taken over the Right-wing. They have incredible power over the media and they use their power and influence to siphon off resources and support for Israel even though Australia and America and Britain have no strategic interest whatsoever in Israel. Like actually. They’ve captured politicians in America through incredibly nefarious means, like where they’re running paedophile networks and shit like that! They have [word unclear] like British monarchs and you know, elites from across society. Who knows how deep that goes. This is why we should oppose Israel. They’ve dragged us into wars we had no business fighting for no strategic benefit to ourselves. They taken over the Right-wing and redirect the Right-wing towards, in our countries towards their interests as opposed to representing the interests of our actual nation and people. This is what we should be criticising them for what they’re doing to us!

 

Like in Australia recently, you know, we’ve been going, doing a lot of activism and discussing a lot about the involvement of the organised jewish community and probably the Mossad in leveraging false flag, so-called anti-semitic attacks to push through an agenda to attack our free speech, to make it illegal for us to criticise jews in Israel and other racial groups as well.

 

That’s why we should be criticising jews. We should be explaining to the people of White Australians, White Americans and so on what jews are doing to them and why jews are their enemy. I think going on about like bleeding hearts about the poor Palestinians and this kind of shit is the wrong trajectory because it plays into the same moral framework that is used to describe how the poor Aboriginals and the horrors of colonialism, White colonialism or you know, the poor African slaves in America or etc. Etc, etc. It’s the same morality and framing that is used as a stick to beat the White man. And it’s generally appeals to Leftists who are anti-White, who hate the British Empire, who hate the White Australia Policy, who hate the racist founding of America, blah blah, blah blah, who hate us and everything that we stand for.

 

So to me that’s insane! The argument they make is:

 

“Well if you try and if you try and defend settler colonialism, if you say oh well, Australia was built on settler colonialism, then you’re just being the bad guy.”

Apparently you’re being the bad guy. You’re playing into the narrative of the enemy. Apparently this is what these people say. And no one’s going to support your White nationalist movement. What you have to do is say:

 

“You know what, I agree with the Left, Aboriginals were treated horribly and we don’t deserve to have this country because we’re horrible colonial occupiers!”

 

[1:35:31]

 

And somehow acknowledging all of that is going to help us to advance White nationalism. Like it doesn’t make any sense to me. It’s very simple. This country was built on settler colonialism. This country was built on our people coming here, conquering it, taking it off the people who were previously here, asserting our dominance over it, securing it for our people, fighting for it, defending it, building it up into what it is.

 

And that’s how shit works, that’s how nature works. We live in a dog-eat-dog world. Everything anyone has in this world was taken off someone else at some point. There’s a finite amount of resources on this planet. There’s not enough to go around. Some people win, some people lose. I want to win, I don’t want to lose. And when you assert your interest in this world, someone loses out. There’s never a way to be a totally nice guy and for everyone to get everything that they want. It just doesn’t work like that. That’s not how God made Earth, the universe. If you don’t like that, take it up with God. But that’s how it is, that’s reality.

 

And this idea that we need to be like 20th century liberals, we can’t assert the morality of any of our ancestors before 20th century, post World War II liberalism. We can’t say the British Empire was glorious! We can’t say the colonisation of Australia was glorious! That we can’t assert the interests of White people and White Australians just because we are White and because no one’s going to look after us but ourselves. It’s ridiculous!

 

That’s a message that makes complete sense. I believe in it. And I don’t think White people are going to be able to do what is necessary to take back control of our countries unless they’re willing to accept a message like that. I don’t think this so-called normie demographic that exists out there that is willing to be White nationalists only so long as White nationalists chungus pilled and respect everyone and don’t want to assert their superiority of everyone and want to like eke out space for everyone’s human rights and treat everyone amazingly and love everybody. I don’t think these people really exist. I think people who need to be placated to like that actually are against us and won’t embrace our politics no matter how chungus, no matter how moral fagged we make it.

 

And I also believe that the average person is capable of understanding that we live in a world of struggle. That life is struggle. That you got to fight for it, you got to fight for your existence on this planet. And that either we’re going to fight for our collective existence as a people or it’s going to be taken from us and that those are the two options on the table. We need a reality check! We need to come come to reality on this question. We can’t live in this illusion that if we just frame things with the Right moral arguments and make the right amount of concessions that we can somehow negotiate a perfectly nice and non-violent and non-controversial way for us to continue existing on this planet and to continue having our own countries. It’s the mentality of a fucking cuck. It’s the mentality of a loser.

 

We have strength as a race. Incredible collective strength! If we come together and assert our interests together. If we’re willing to come together and fight for our existence, we can secure it. That’s what it comes down to.

 

And I’m not going to forsake the incredible actions of my ancestors. I’m going to venerate them. What they did to create this country. Stealing countries of other peoples is something that few peoples are actually capable of I don’t consider it to be an immoral thing, I think you either fight for it or you don’t deserve it. If we lost World War II to the Japanese, if we ultimately one day lose this country to other races, other forces, ultimately we’d have no one to blame but ourselves for not fighting with enough valiance, for not mustering enough strength and power to hold on to what is ours. We have to take responsibility to secure our own future. No one else on this planet owes us anything and we don’t owe them anything. That’s reality.

 

And I want to live in reality. I don’t want to live in this fucked gay ideological delusion that some people in this movement want to live in. And I don’t want to pretend to believe things I don’t believe.

 

A lot of people say:

 

“Hey, look man I don’t really believe this shit either, but it’s going to help us make jews look bad or it’s going to help us win over moderates to our position if we just pretend to believe in it.”

 

I don’t believe in pretending to believe in shit! Pretending to believe in shit is inauthentic. It’s not how we’re going to convince people to stand side by side with us and fight for an objective, is pretending to believe things we don’t believe.

 

The way that we’re going to get men to stand behind us and fight to believe in our cause, believe in our movement, is to actually believe what we believe and say it proudly and openly! To have faith in our ideas, that our ideas are inherently have so much truth and potency and value that they will succeed. That’s how we’re going to win!

 

And yeah I’ve had this argument before with people. They say:

 

“Oh, I’m a universal nationalist. I believe in nationalism for all people.”

 

Well, that’s a nice thing for you to say. So are you going to go and fight for Algerian nationalism? Are you going to go and fight the Sri Lankan nationalism? No, you don’t actually give a fuck about Azerbaijani nationalism or Venezuelan nationalism. You say you believe in everyone’s right being equal to having a nation, but you’re not willing to fight for everyone’s nation. You’re willing to fight for your nation and maybe some brother nations that you have.

 

[1:42:01]

 

So maybe if you’re an Australian, you’d be willing to fight for Britain because that’s the land of your ancestors. You’re willing to fight for Ireland or whatever. If the Americans had a civil war, you’d be willing to go and fight for the White team because they’re our ethnic cousins or something like that. Okay, that makes sense.

 

But if you aren’t really willing to fight and die for it, you don’t actually believe in it, to any significant or deep level that it’s of consequence.

 

So why can’t you just say you’re an Australian nationalist and just say you want to fight for a White Australia? Anyone who has a problem with that, you want to crush them. You want to crush them and destroy them because it’s us or them! That’s what we believe in. Why isn’t that good enough? Good enough for me.

 

Maybe it’s not good enough for you’re a liar. Like, you’re just a liar. You don’t actually really believe what you’re saying. You’re trying to come up with a strategy, like a marketing, like a moral marketing strategy where you pretend to have this morality that’s nice to everyone so that people will allow you to have your own country or something. It doesn’t mean that we should have like zero allies or zero respect for other people. But let’s be real here. Why can’t you’re asserting your own interests in your own and the future of your own people?

 

Like and for example, in Australia, we have a military alliance with Japan. The Japanese are a completely different people. I think the Japanese are an incredible nation, incredible cultural achievements, whatever. I wouldn’t fight for Japan unless it was in Australia. I’d fight for Australia if we were like allied in a war together and it made sense, it was in our interest to fight together against a mutual enemy. But I wouldn’t fight for Japan. I don’t think it would be a good thing if Japan was like, wiped off the face of the planet necessarily. I think they’re interesting, cool people. But I wouldn’t be willing to die to save Japan. So I can respect Japan. Maybe we could have an alliance with Japan if it’s in our interest. But I’m not a Japanese nationalist.

 

I don’t ultimately believe in some metaphysical right that the Japanese have to exist. Ultimately, it’s the responsibility of the Japanese to secure their own existence, and it’s the responsibility of White Australians to secure our own existence. And it’s the responsibility of Palestinians to secure their own existence and the responsibility of whatever group of people it is to secure their own existence on this planet. That’s how it works. That’s the iron Law of Nature. So Modern World reject said:

 

“We cannot negotiate for our existence. We must secure it through struggle.”

 

And he hailed and yeah, that’s basically the essence of my view. Someone said here:

 

“Joel didn’t get the Rabbi Noseberg meme.”

 

No, I did get the meme. I just didn’t think it was that funny. So I did like a kind of deadpan delivery.

 

Now, what else have we got here? I think that’s basically a good show for the evening. So give me some feedback. Did you still enjoy the show, even though it was just me riding solo? Don’t usually do this. I usually have the foil of having someone to talk to. It feels a bit weird just sitting here speaking into, like a laptop. Like, not talking to another human being. Feels a bit inorganic. But I’ve been doing this a long time, so I could still kind of sell it, I think. Jack Brady, given some respect:

 

“Excellent monologue.”

 

Well, I appreciate that. Friend of the show. Obviously been on the show before. High praise.

 

But, yeah, everyone’s seemed to enjoy the stream, so I’m glad you watched. I’m glad you listened. And yeah, got some things coming up. There was an interview by this guy called Hermes from the United States. He does like these street interviews that have been going viral lately. He’s obviously like a nationalist from America. Seems like a solid dude. I haven’t really spoken to him much before, but he interviewed Tom earlier this week, which you can find, I think, on Rumble. And we’re doing a collaboration soon. I’ll put out on my social media on Telegram, when we’re gonna go live. I think soon. I think maybe like Sunday, Australian time, Saturday night American time was the plan. But, yeah, I’ll put it out when it’s all, like, ready to go with links and stuff.

 

And I’m also going to do a collaboration with Ferryman from Canada next week. I think there’s a new Codex India documentary that’s going to be released. And they wanted us to do a kind of Watch Party promotion. The previous one was pretty funny. It was kind of like this David Attenborough narrating, like Pajeets in the Wild. I’m sure a lot of you have seen it. So anyhow, I don’t know what to expect. [chuckling] I haven’t seen it yet, but should be funny.

 

And yeah, there’s a few other things happening. So keep an eye on social media, keep in touch and we’ll fill you in on when we’re doing more content when we’re doing more activism, etc. And if you’re in Australia, join the fucking movement! ! WhiteAustralia.org, WhiteAus.org. If you don’t want to come and be a member of the NSN, marching around on the street, doing street activism, you can join and just come to the community events. You can come and train with us. Kickboxing, weightlifting, barbecues, seminars, we’re putting on more events. Come get involved in the community. At least get networked with fellow White nationalists.

 

And if you don’t even have time for that, at the very least, sign up as a supporter. Put your name down so we can get registered as a political party. We’re getting closer and closer to hitting the target. We haven’t even done an official launch yet. We will get more than enough signatures. Be a member of the party. We need members. So at least sign up as a member or even better, come and join the community. Come and get involved in a more direct capacity. A lot of events are going to be organised through the rest of the year.

 

[1:49:04]

 

The only way that we can turn around the political situation in this country is if White nationalists in Australia come together, join the Organisation, join the party and build a movement that can actually change things. We have the foundation of a movement that has the potential to really make an impact, which we haven’t had in this country for a long time. We’ve created that foundation.

 

The only way that that foundation can go into something actually tangible, making like, real, meaningful change is if everyone gets behind us and backs us. Even if it’s just as simple as just signing up as a member of our political party, which really is not asking for very much at all!

 

So WhiteAustralia.org. Sign up! Join up! You know, don’t you want to see us enter politics in Australia? Wouldn’t that bring you joy? Wouldn’t that be fucking awesome? Like, oh, you don’t want like me and Blair and Tom and shit running for office. You want to fucking vote for, who you voting for? Craig Kelly? You want to vote for Ralph Babet? You want to vote for Pauline Hanson? This shit sucks, man! Help us give awesome candidates! Our policies are going to be amazing! We’re going to break the fucking news cycle. We’re going to have the most interesting political party probably in the whole world. Fucking why have you not signed up yet? Sign up, help us win!

 

But yeah, anyway, so that’s the end of the stream. I hope you enjoyed it. And White power, blood and honour! Hail victory! See you all next time.

 

[1:51:06]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/11/2025 = 35)

J0hnC0nn0r
6 days ago
There is no question, they all need to leave
9 likes

Report
J0hnC0nn0r
6 days ago
You know why they removed the death penalty. Because if they used it in this case then it would be injected into the public consciousness as a solution and then the sheep might get ideas about applying it to other criminals.
7 likes

Report
JoshRecessionberg
Supporter
6 days ago
Society is falling apart with Jewish ‘democracy’
6 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
J0hnC0nn0r
5 days ago
Lets state the obvious
0 likes

Report
Lynchmob11
5 days ago
Awesome show. You should do a weekly solo show where you break down geopolitical events, since the other show is mainly centered upon Aussie politics.
5 likes

Report
SueNewson
5 days ago
you done a great job!
5 likes

Report
natogroyper
5 days ago
Great show, these type of shows that you do where you break down geopolitics from a Australian nationalist perspective are brilliant and its important. It’s something that we need more of. You really come into your own doing this type of content mate
5 likes

Report
leibekohne
6 days ago
Usury free world economy will solved lots of problems including wives staying at home. Also the wars will disappear no financing jew banks. In modern world China has never necessary ability to fight a long war. They could do nothing against small Japan. If that should happens the will end of humanity. Those problems, can be overcome by changing the communist China into Monarchy as used to be.
4 likes

Report
StevenGurr
3 days ago
Kill all pedo fags
3 likes

Report
katana17
6 days ago
[Joel Davis – Nothing is Happening, But It Will – Jun 26, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/06/28/joel-davis-nothing-is-happening-but-it-will-jun-26-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss ZOG vs Iran, Mark Latham vs Minns, the caravan hoax, Trump jews and Epstein, Israel with 200 nukes, JFK assassination, boomers being selfish, Holohoax Card wearing out, WWIII with China vs ZOG, jews not being flashy, Joel dreams of an Aston Martin, miscegenation, Human rights, NSN childcare policy, and current events, etc. – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 21,471 – Duration: 125 mins]
2 likes

Delete
J0hnC0nn0r
6 days ago
I dont agree with your idea to pay the mothers to stay at home instead of childcare, as that doesnt address the root cause of why the wahmen are working in the first place. Usually to pay for the usury loan and every other fucking rip off corporate swine and their small hat masters are perpetrating on the White race. Anything that undermines the ponzi scheme, aka forcing a collapse is the only option.
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
JoshRecessionberg
Supporter
5 days ago
You are a fool. Who is going to support a party advocating for an economic collapse? It is more like an economic transition that will have to be done smoothly and professionally in order to reinvigorate White Australia. Implementing policies in phases is the best approach. Talking about collapse is for low IQ blackpilled degenerates.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
J0hnC0nn0r
5 days ago
Sure thing fuck wit. Lets move jew money for daycare to middle class welfare, banksters dont care they still get their usury bucks, inflate property prices based on the extra income and keep the ponzi scheme going. Just to stick to your ad hominem attacks and idiocy, you clearly are a stupid zoomer cunt rash because this shit was done under Howard and led to much of this fucking mess. The fact you still think this is a viable “policy” when the same Whites sucking off the govt tit will turn on NSN etc when the welfare tap is turned off (transitioned as you put it like a tranny) truly shows how stupid and short sighted you are.
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
1Antonius
3 days ago
People are too degenerate to play moderate with them. They’ll still betray you, it’s in their nature.
0 likes
Report
leibekohne
6 days ago
therefore NSN you must stop drinking even beer drink Kombucha instead. Never slacken be vigilant You must be hard, strong without any remorse and it will require blood, because you waited to long, because you let yourselves your parents to be fooled whilst the internal enemy never stopped only intensified after WW2 He mesmerized us and made us imbecilic morons murdered us lied to us stole from us killed us used us exploited us destroyed us to merely 6% of world population and going down faster and faster to total distinction of Aryan goyim white race wake up shiksa cunts and fight; teach abusive fanatical communist police a hard lesson, give it back.
2 likes

Report
MPCV
Supporter
6 days ago
o/ HH
2 likes

Report
JFurM
Verified
4 days ago
To your point Joel, on the study that covered the 33% drop in fertility of women who go the jab vs those that didn’t… as a woman who previous to Covid, had no fertility issues, I stared having lots of issues with my cycle as well as miscarriages as soon as the vax came out. My husband and I did not get it but most all of our family members did. This is an experience that many other women (not vaccinated) I have spoken with share in common. Potentially due to vaccine shedding and or what they’ve been putting in our water (I.e. Dr Ardis’ work shows this). Either way, agree with what you said about the massive wealth transfer that was going on during covid, and it eerily all began in nov of 2019. Very few people were talking about what was going on with all the major corporations and financial elites at the time. They definitely took advantage though to hurt us health wise, in our economy and as a society. Hopefully enough are awake now to not get fooled again! Great show!
2 likes

Report
Bigboy6669
5 days ago
bump
1 like

Report
palacepony
Supporter
6 days ago
Wuhan Institute entered a partnership with Peter Daszak/ Ecohealth Alliance. Special Cancer virus programs, ‘defense’ programs, theres beeb decades of work on G.O.F virus manipulation. See pizzapicklespur on X, also Charles Rixey (prometheusshrugged.org.) See Major Murphy’s release of the D.E.F.U.S.E document. Rixey will take you there. Research into Covid amyloidogenic properties continues @ mccairndojo.com. Support the doc; https://rumble.com/v6uyxpb-lab-updates-synthesizing-amyloidogenic-fibrin.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
6 days ago
https://t.wtyl.live/videos/browse?s=1
0 likes

Report
palacepony
Supporter
5 days ago
succinct overview; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OHBkkZeqms
0 likes

Report
TripleGas
Verified
5 days ago
need to kick out and block nons from entry before implementing anything like paying for mothers to stay home or it’s just another incentive for them to come and breed.
0 likes

Report
Kroninn
Supporter
5 days ago
Taiwan has around 2 million private gun owners. I dont think it would be too easy for China to invade them. Especially with the Philipines and others helping them.
0 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
4 days ago
Colac constitutional restoration conference in Colac upcoming late July; https://rumble.com/v6vqyl7-2-seminars-26th-27th-july-augusto-zimmermann-darren-dixon-and-tim-dwyer.html
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Trump is not American either. His mother is from Scotland. And his father could be a German jew if you look at Fred Trump’s physiognomy. Trump is also a New Yorker.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Trump is not founding stock American like us that have been here since the 1600s.
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Israel sucks at colonization. Look at a settler colonial nation that was White, and had no outside funding. America, Australia, Canada. Jews have all the money on the world and still can’t make a nation larger than new jersey.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Jews are the laziest parasite bastards ever known. They should have listened to Hitler when he said they can live comfortably on Madagascar, but they resisted, now their final fate will be worse.
0 likes

Report
amacc14
Supporter
4 days ago
Democracy is fake and stupid. Listen to us, we’re sitting around, brainstorming how to get VOTES. Pathetic.
0 likes

Report
localsussybaka
4 days ago
The political analysis gets more compelling each day.
0 likes

Report
MattOosty
3 days ago
A stream/space with Karl would be amazing
0 likes

Report
PhooeyPhoxide
21 hours ago
Joel overrates the CCP. They can’t even take Taiwan. No way China is even going to put a dent in the New World Order.
0 likes

Report
BrossefStalin
5 days ago
Blair is so fragile. Always talking about how tired he is or how he feels weird. He had to get up early and it took him over the edge? Man up
-2 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Sam Newman: Well, now. Well, now, I’ll probably take a kicking for doing this, but that’s why I’m doing it. Because we speak to people of interest. And I don’t think you could get any more interest than these two people sitting opposite me for probably the wrong reasons, but it doesn’t matter. Everyone has a story and we’d like to know what it is, as unpalatable as it may be to some.

 

But in front of me is Thomas Sewell and Blair Cottrell. And they seem to be the face, for want of a better word, “Nazism” in Australia or the face of “White supremacy”.

 

And they’ve been in court in Adelaide on Australia Day. And I thought, this is extraordinary. They look like two presentable people to me. And they might think I’m not too presentable, but I’d like to know what’s going on in the back of their mind, in the front of their mind, and what they do this for and who they are and how they started.

 

Can I ask you this first? Can I ask you this first, Thomas? You’ll love this question. Are you a debutant, or a fan of Hitler?

 

Thomas Sewell: I believe that Adolf Hitler was the greatest man of the 20th century.

 

Sam Newman: And why? Because he tried to wipe out the jews?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, we can get into that.

 

Sam Newman: No, we can, but, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ll answer the question first and then we can discuss the Holocaust specifically at this.

 

But I would like to answer the question without the Holocaust being on the table to start with. Because I believe that the Holocaust is disputed, I don’t believe that it’s true. I think it’s a trillion dollar industry that’s been running for too long. That is just to start with. But to answer the question, …

 

Sam Newman: At this stage, Paul, at this stage, Thomas. Sorry. I probably should stop this interview. We probably should finish this now.

 

Thomas Sewell: Why?

 

Sam Newman: No, people will say:

 

“Well, if that is your attitude and that is the person you look up to, we probably shouldn’t go on with this.”

 

But this makes me go on with it even more. So, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I think we need to have an honest conversation about World War II. I think we need to have an honest conversation about Adolf Hitler. And if I’m wrong, then I think the media should be honest and prove where what I’ve said is incorrect.

 

[See: Adolf Hitler — A Short Sketch of His Life – Part 1]

 

My appreciation of Adolf Hitler is quite simple. I believe that Germany was destroyed in the 1920s, and I believe that it took a great man to revitalise the German national spirit. I think Australia is facing the same, and the Western world, the whole White Western world is facing the same set of circumstances as Weimar Germany was facing in the 1920s. And we’re facing that in the 2000s. And I think what we need is a revival in our national spirit!

 

So it’s not necessarily Hitler as an individual that I think we need to revive, but I think he had a very clear political strategy, a very clear spiritual meaning to the German people.

 

And I think that if Australia has a love of its own folk, we can survive and not just survive, but we can thrive. We can rebuild the Australian dream and create greatness here in this land.

 

Sam Newman: So I’ve been to Dachau. What would you say to people who say that Hitler himself, through his acolytes, burnt and incinerated millions of jews in the name of ethnic cleansing, if you like? You’re disputing that?

 

[See: The Liberation of the Camps: Facts vs. Lies]

 

Thomas Sewell: I dispute it because the history, the proven history that we have, not jewish Hollywood and mythology, is that, …

 

Sam Newman: I’ve seen, people have seen, …

 

Thomas Sewell: You might have seen piles of shoes and if you went to, …

 

Sam Newman: No, I’ve seen piles of bodies, people being shot in pits. From the, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I don’t believe in the 6 million number. Certainly there were people that were killed and there was a Einsatzgruppen* and there was a anti-partisan task force in the SS that was devised to hunt down and kill people that were committing war crimes against the German army. So they were dressed as civilians.

Regarding gas chambers, I think history will prove that that is a falsity, created by a narrative. Regarding the burning of bodies. There wasn’t enough crematorium ovens to burn 6 million bodies, and they’ve actually revised the original Auschwitz number from four and a half down to one and a half down to 1.1. And now they’re saying that maybe they can prove 250,000 died here. But the math still doesn’t add up.

 

So I don’t really want to come on the show to talk about the Holocaust.

 

 

Sam Newman: No! I don’t!

 

Thomas Sewell: I don’t really want to talk about the Hitler. But, what I want to talk about is Australia. That’s why I came on. Obviously it’s impossible to avoid the conversation of Hitler because we are nationalists and we’re National Socialists.

 

Sam Newman: So you’re anti-semitic?

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m counter-semitic. Yeah, absolutely!

 

Sam Newman: You’re anti-the jews?

 

Thomas Sewell: I think the individual jew, I don’t have much of a concern for them. I don’t really.

 

Sam Newman: But that is, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Anti-semitism for me is I believe that there is an alien spirituality, an alien political position that is antithetical to our survival as Western civilisation. I don’t believe that Western civilisation was built alongside jews. I think jews have been from the very beginning antagonistic. I think they open the gates of Toledo, they open the gates of Constantinople, they open the gates of Vienna and they allowed Muslim, …

 

[05:35]

 

Sam Newman: Plenty of people are antagonistic, but that’s taking it to a whole new level. The world is full of antagonistic people and countries.

 

Thomas Sewell: It is.

 

Sam Newman: So they just found a caravan in New South Wales [chuckling] loaded with explosives with a view, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I don’t advocate for terrorism, if that’s what you’re asking me. I don’t advocate for terrorism. What I want is a free and noble people! I want our country to be free and noble.

 

Sam Newman: And you want, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That caravan you mentioned though, that was discovered. That was a little bit suspicious, wasn’t it? That a caravan full of explosives, …

 

Sam Newman: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: Was discovered with the addresses of the targets written down on a piece of paper inside. It was all very convenient.

 

Sam Newman: So what are you saying about the caravan with full of explosives?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m saying that there’s a lot of kicking and screaming in the jewish community, and they seem to be getting a lot of money. A special task force, and they are the primary beneficiaries of these threats, if you pay attention.

 

Sam Newman: So you’re not saying the jewish fraternity loaded the caravan up?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m not saying that. I don’t have any proof of that. But what I’m saying is when something like this happens, you have to ask yourself, well, who stands to benefit?

 

 

Thomas Sewell: Cui bono. Who benefits?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, …

 

Thomas Sewell: So a good answer to your question as well is a lot of these anti-semitic attacks have been proven. And the AFP [Australian Federal Police] came out recently and stated that foreign agents are paying organised criminals to pay junkies to commit these anti-semitic attacks. No one in my organisation and no one in my extended community has spray painted synagogues or done anything silly like that. Because we don’t want to go down that path. That’s not what we’re interested in.

 

 

[See: The Noticer – Yes, they really do hate freedom (Part 1) FEBRUARY 10, 2025 – MITCH SUTTON]

 

But in the absence of us doing it’s either the Palestinians doing it, the Arabs and Palestinians, or it is what foreign government is paying organised crime to attack synagogues and why? Why are they paying people? And this is a fact, this isn’t my speculation, the AFP came out recently and said:

 

“Foreign governments are paying organised criminals to subcontract out anti-semitic attacks.”

 

So what does this have to do with me and my historical analysis of Western civilisation?

 

Sam Newman: So you gave a Nazi salute, did you not?

 

Thomas Sewell: Many times.

 

Sam Newman: Yes, many times.

 

Thomas Sewell: Many times. That is the Roman salute or the Nazi salute.

 

Sam Newman: Hang on! The Nazi salute, which is actually banned and considered, not hate speech because it’s not a speech. But you, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, it’s a political gesture. It is a form of speech.

 

Sam Newman: Which has been banned by Western, …

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s being contested, but yes, …

 

Sam Newman: It is currently been banned. It’s illegal. But you do it anyhow because you’re by nature being anti-social.

 

Thomas Sewell: We haven’t done it since it’s been made illegal. That’s Jacob Hersant. He did it. He’s the only person to be arrested for doing so.

 

[See: The Noticer – Jacob Hersant facing a year in jail for political salute]

 

Sam Newman: You didn’t do it in the courthouse coming out of Adelaide?

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, no, no, no! That footage that you’re seeing is from about two or three years ago.

 

Sam Newman: I see. So since they made it illegal, you’ve stopped doing the Nazi salute?

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m waiting to hear what the High Court decision is with Jacob Hersant’s case. So that judgement will decide whether we do it in the future.

 

Blair Cottrell: So there’s quite a few people who have been charged with doing it since that ban came into place, including our former Neighbours [Australian sit-com] star Damien Richardson, who gave the gesture satirically during a during a private venue speech.

 

So the law does need to be tested there, because when you’re going to be charging people for raising their arm a certain distance above their hip, that’s a little bit much!

 

Sam Newman: Elon Musk was accused of doing it, but of course. And there’s a difference, I think, whether it be palatable or not in comedy, black humour, you can do certain things if you are a comedic working comedically in front of an audience.

 

Blair Cottrell: Of course.

 

Thomas Sewell: But I don’t think Musk did it for comedy. I think he did it as a political expression of his excitement.

 

 

Sam Newman: No! Thomas, Musk didn’t do it. It had nothing to do with the Nazi salute.

 

Blair Cottrell: How do you know? Have you spoken to him?

 

Sam Newman: No, I haven’t spoken to him, but people have asked him, why wouldn’t he say, “yes, I was giving the Nazi salute”? He was, …

 

Thomas Sewell: We’re arguing semantics. Like, is it the Roman salute or is it the Nazi salute? Because he definitely gave a Roman salute. His gesture was Roman in nature. And he is appreciator of Roman history. He stated he likes Roman history.

 

Sam Newman: He’s a sympathizer of the jewish Holocaust, or the jewish, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I’d be if browbeaten by Netanyahu and taken to the museums. Yes, I did see that. I don’t know if he, …

 

Sam Newman: So what happens when someone hails a taxi and they throw out their hand in the absolute epitome of a Nazi salute?

 

Blair Cottrell: Exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, so that’s why it comes down to this is a “thought crime”, because the gesture itself isn’t what’s being made illegal, it’s the thoughts behind the gesture.

 

Sam Newman: But you do it. You both, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s not actually my style.

 

[10:15]

 

Sam Newman: So you give a Nazi salute in order to mean exactly what it meant, that you are a sympathizer of Hitler’s and his regime and what he was on about. And you would like that.

 

So Donald Trump was being accused by the Democrats during the four years of electioneering of being Hitler and being likened to Hitler. Do you take offence at that? Do you think Donald Trump’s what the Democrats said he was “a devotee of Hitler’s”?

 

Thomas Sewell: No. Donald Trump is a liberal, he believes in, …

 

Sam Newman: But he wants nationalism. He wants America First, like you want Australia.

 

Thomas Sewell: He wants parts of nationalism as a liberal, the way that we want parts of democracy and liberty as a nationalist.

 

Sam Newman: Yes.

 

Thomas Sewell: So we all want parts of each other’s ideas.

 

I don’t believe in this political theory that everything is set 100% in stone, you can’t borrow ideas or thoughts from other groups.

 

Sam Newman: So someone like Donald Trump or someone on a level mental footing. Not saying you’re not on a level mental footing, but people you don’t want any coloured people of any skin colour other than White people to live in this country.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s a big generalisation.

 

Sam Newman: Well, I’m asking you!

 

Blair Cottrell: We’ve jumped into the deep end with this conversation. I didn’t know we were going to start off with Hitler and the Holocaust!

 

Sam Newman: So, Blair, let’s pretend, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I want a home for White people.

 

Sam Newman: Let’s pretend we’ve just started this conversation.

 

Welcome, boys! Welcome! What question would you like me to ask you first up? Go ahead.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I thought we’d start the conversation with Australia Day. The controversy that led us here in the first place. And the fact that we’re Australians, we’re not Germans, and we’re representing an Australian brand of nationalism

 

Sam Newman: Unfortunately, you can’t see my notes. Let’s get into all that. All written down here, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m happy to do it in order. You’re the host.

 

Sam Newman: No, but I thought it would be good if people are watching this and listening to this, it would be nice to know that if you are a devotee or an admirer of Hitler’s, why?

 

Because that usually engenders a fair amount of angst among, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Why?

 

Blair Cottrell: Some.

 

Sam Newman: Usually. Well, you’re explaining why it doesn’t, and I’m saying, generally if you are a friend or admirer of Hitler’s, that doesn’t go over well.

 

Blair Cottrell: Hang on, let’s answer a general question with a general answer.

 

Sam Newman: Right, okay.

 

Blair Cottrell: Hitler’s a very significant figure in history.

 

Sam Newman: He is!

 

Blair Cottrell: And the guy made a lot of right decisions. He did a lot of good for Germany at the time. No one can dispute that. But he didn’t do everything right. If he did he would have one the war. There’s lessons to be learnt from Hitler. And some of those lessons we can incorporate into an Australian brand of nationalism, for the good of our country. And I think that is the general standpoint that we would take.

 

Sam Newman: So, this is where I should have started the interview?

 

Sam Newman: Let’s keep moving. Let’s keep the ball rolling.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is this a live interview, or is this recorded? I’m not really sure what we are doing here.

 

Sam Newman: No, this is pre-recorded. Does that matter?

 

Blair Cottrell: Not really. I would usually prefer it to be live, because it can be, …

 

Sam Newman: I can absolutely tell you! I give you my word. Hey mate!

 

Blair Cottrell: Let me say this too.

 

Sam Newman: No! Blair! Blair, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I think you would agree with us on most things. It’s just that perspective of World War Two.

 

Sam Newman: Blair, we are telling you this now, we have never editing anything, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m not accusing you of that.

 

Sam Newman: No, you said you would like to do it live, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Some journalists, …

 

Sam Newman: Hang on! I’m not some journalist. And I’m not a journalist. We’ve never edited anything other than saying, “I’m not sure you should say that for libel or slander purposes.” So we don’t want to get sued.

 

Blair Cottrell: Sure. Fair enough.

 

Sam Newman: We have taken two or three things out of one or two interviews we have done over five years. This is absolutely as we speak, so I’m just telling you that now. And if you were recording this on your phone you can play it back and when it goes to air you can see that I’m just telling you that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Look you’ve given us a fair go, and I apprciate it. As I said before the show I grew up in 89, so I watched you on TV as a kid. Me and my dad thought you were good value.

 

Sam Newman: Good on you. So why are you so pre-occupied with, … We had a White Australian policy, here, back in the 40s.

 

Thomas Sewell: Until the 70s.

 

Sam Newman: What?

 

Thomas Sewell: Until the 70s.

 

Sam Newman: I think Harold Holt [a former Prime Minister] in 1966, or 1970? He decided, … Anyway, we had a White Australian policy. You would like that to be reinstated, would you?

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you feel that Australia was better back then than it is now?

 

Sam Newman: In what way?

 

[Image: Australia, aerial view of Sydney, 1960s]

 

Blair Cottrell: Nicer place to live, more manageable infrastructure, more manageable population. I could imagine in the 60s, not that I was alive back then. Australia probably was a nice place to live, and it’s probably a lot different now as a result of the people who are coming into this country, a lot of the time to exploit Australia.

 

Sam Newman: Yep.

 

Now, so having said that is just a pointless. It is really a pointless question to say, did I prefer to live in the 60s, because I did.

 

[Image: The Gold Coast, Queensland late 1960s meter maid]

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, you’re saying by default you preferred to live in a White Australia, because in the 60s, Australia was predominantly White.

 

Sam Newman: I didn’t say I preferred, I said it was, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, what’s the defining factor that separates the 60s from now?

 

Sam Newman: The fact that we have a cosmopolitan country of people pouring into it and hopefully they’re vetted! Bit like what Trump’s on about in America is that we vet the right people coming in and hopefully they contribute. You couldn’t say that Australia, … Would you say Australia is not the better for the multicultural society we live in?

 

Thomas Sewell: My main contention is that it is not better, that it is worse.

 

Sam Newman: And what would you like to do about it?

 

Thomas Sewell: I’d like to do a lot of things about it, …

 

Sam Newman: But it’s here now. There’s 25 million of us here and they’re from every country in the world!

 

Blair Cottrell: A lot of people need to go!

 

Sam Newman: Would you like to deport them?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: A lot of people need to go home. There’s people that are in our country illegally.

 

Just recently, actually it was brought to light that there are some fake scam universities through which Indians are coming into our country. They’re signing up on these fake universities, which are actually just websites, …

 

Sam Newman: Yep.

 

Blair Cottrell: And they’re here legally on fake student visas. And that’s just what we know of! There’s a lot of scams beneath that we haven’t even figured out yet.

 

Sam Newman: So that’s not necessarily hoping that we’ll just have a White country. That’s hoping that we’ll send back people who are here illegally, no matter what skin colour they are.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s how you start! That’s how you start. I think that’s the starting point that we can all agree on, is that people that have entered the country illegally should be deported. And we have to have the strength to do that. We have to have the strength to enforce laws! And if we don’t have the strength to enforce laws, then a home for everyone is a home for no one!

 

Sam Newman: Yeah, but so, …

 

[17:07]

 

Thomas Sewell: My most important contention is and my most, my biggest argument for what we want as a future, is a home, individually and collectively. Why? If you let me finish, Sam, because I can see you’re trying to interject.

 

Sam Newman: I haven’t interjected.

 

Thomas Sewell: I know. I’d appreciate, if I just get 30 seconds.

 

White people deserve a home! There’s 1.4 billion Chinamen, there’s 1.4 billion Indians, there’s a billion Africans, there’s a billion Arabs. And they’ve all got their own countries. Now if there was a White country on earth, I would, I don’t want to leave Australia! But if you said to me:

 

“Tom, why don’t you go live in Poland or Lithuania or Latvia or whatever?”

 

I would say:

 

“Look, it’s tempting, but I love Australia!”

 

It is tempting because I don’t like what’s happening to this country. I think White people deserve a home collectively. They have a home, we don’t have one! We’re being told that Australia is for everyone! And if it’s for everyone, then it’s for no one! That’s my position.

 

And second to that collectively, is individually. I individually cannot afford a home. My father bought a home on three years wages. I could not even buy a 200 square meter block of dirt in Parnee [sp] for three years wages. So I, because of the conditions the government has put our generation through, I and the people younger than me are getting locked out of the market. And when we do afford a home, like where I rent, where I can’t even afford where I rent, I take my child to the playground, Sam, and every single other child at the playground is speaking a foreign language to their parents!

 

My child is the only child at the playground that’s speaking English. And I’m surrounded by people that are being told:

 

“Oh, this is a great multicultural diversity!”

 

And it just means less White people, less White culture. And ultimately we’re going to turn into global South Africa.

 

[See: How Africans May Differ from Westerners]

 

And I will fight to stop that from happening, Sam! I don’t want us to turn into South Africa. I had family in Rhodesia, I had family in South Africa. I’m not letting it happen here!

 

And so I’m trying with all my might to be peaceful and reasonable and political. But we have to protect White Australia. We have to!

 

Blair Cottrell: Was there ever a point in the past where there was some democratic process, like maybe a referendum on multiculturalism? Were the people ever asked? I’m asking you’ve been around a bit longer than me.

 

Sam Newman: Don’t ask me anything, mate. You speak for as long as you like.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t believe there was.

 

Sam Newman: When you’re finished, I’ll ask you a question, because I don’t want to interrupt you.

 

Thomas Sewell: No, no, I’m finished.

 

Sam Newman: Sure you’re finished? Go ahead, Blair.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I think it’s important again to ask yourself, who are the beneficiaries of multiculturalism and mass migration between 2024, I think, and, 2025 this year, or maybe it was 23 and, 24, 1.1 million migrants arrived in Australia in a single year. Okay, that’s record numbers never seen before in the history of Australia. Predominantly from India and China. And predominantly the reason this happens is to enrich the financial sector.

 

You’ve got big property developers like Harry Triguboff*, who’s building tens of thousands of homes out in the swamplands. Cookie cutter homes that standard Australians wouldn’t want to live in, right? And he’s making bank from this immigration. And guess what? He also lobbies the major political parties.

 

[* Harry Oskar Triguboff is a jewish-Australian billionaire real estate developer, and one of Australia’s richest people. He is the founder and managing director of Meriton and is known as “high-rise Harry”. As of May 2023, The Australian Financial Review assessed Triguboff as the fourth richest Australian by net worth, estimated at A$23.80 billion, as published in the 2023 Rich List. Wikipedia]

 

So you can understand why it’s in the interests of certain people to be bringing more migrants into Australia.

 

So it’s not the Australians winning from this. We’re not benefiting. It’s not the average person getting more money in their pocket. People younger than me, they can’t afford to buy a house. So why? I’ll leave you this. Why should Australians have to compete with everybody else in the world for a house in Australia?

 

Sam Newman: Well, we’ve set a record. I haven’t spoken for three minutes, and that doesn’t usually happen.

 

Blair Cottrell: We can become somewhat impassioned!

 

Thomas Sewell: The floor is yours.

 

Blair Cottrell: We get somewhat, …

 

Sam Newman: No, please. No, Blair, please, keep going!

 

Blair Cottrell: Ask your next question, my friend. It’s yours now.

 

Sam Newman: Now, is the country not richer for all the European migration that’s come here over the years, the 25 million of us that are here?

 

Thomas Sewell: I believe it is richer for the Europeans.

 

Sam Newman: The Italians and the, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I believe it’s richer for the European migration.

 

Sam Newman: Is it?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, I believe so.

 

Sam Newman: As long as they’re White?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. White European. European.

 

Sam Newman: So.

 

Thomas Sewell: So I wouldn’t want Australia to turn into little Italy, but 5%, 10% Italian, I agree.

 

Sam Newman: As long as they’re White?

 

Thomas Sewell: They’re Europeans. Yes.

 

Sam Newman: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Greeks and Italians are Europeans.

 

Sam Newman: So you said that we should send back all those people who are here illegally. Illegal aliens, if you like.

 

So if there was some Americans and British and Canadians that were here, we’d send them home, as well as all the Indians that are here illegally as well, would we?

 

Blair Cottrell: We need to be focused on cultural similarity. Right? When we share certain cultural similarities with other people, then obviously integration and coexistence is much more probable. I mean, you only need to look at the situation in Queensland with Vyleen White* who was stabbed to death by an African refugee in a car park. And this is not an isolated incident. This is happening all over the country.

 

[* FEBRUARY 4, 2024 THE NOTICER-UPDATE: Police have released CCTV of four men of African appearance they believe may be able to assist them with enquiries. UPDATE 2: Video and images of the suspects removed after a 16-year-old male was charged with murder: A major manhunt is underway for an African man who stabbed an elderly woman to death during a robbery at a Queensland shopping centre. Vyleen White, 70, was stabbed in the chest at Town Square Redbank Plains Shopping Centre in Ipswich at 6.10pm on Saturday evening, in front of her six-year-old granddaughter. She was treated at the scene but was unable to be saved, while the young girl was assessed but not physically injured. The suspect, described by police as a male of African appearance, left his victim in a pool of blood and fled immediately after the attack, and police have asked members of the public who saw a blue 2009 Hyundai Getz in the area afterward to come forward. Police have seized the hatchback, with Queensland registration 432 TYO, and will allege it was driven from the carpark after the attack. They have since said they are seeking four persons of interest, all males of African appearance, who left that vehicle and walked away.]

 

Sam Newman: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: Carjackings, home invasions, …

 

Sam Newman: Same in America? Plenty of White people stab people as well.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s true, but the statistics prove that it’s very disproportionate. Right? Like I wish race was just skin colour. I wish that was the truth!

 

But the fact is there’s a lot more going on with race than just the colour of skin. It’s the way of thinking and behaving. It’s the IQ, it’s the capacity for creativity and understanding. There’s a lot going on there that we need to explore. This hyper simplified generalised idea that race is just skin colour. Okay. If we’re going to survive as a country, as a people, we need to move beyond that.

 

 

[22:23]

 

Sam Newman: Should we start to move the previous inhabitants of the country out? Should we start to move the Aboriginals out, or what should we do with them?

 

Thomas Sewell: Look, I’ll answer the question regarding the Aboriginals. I think that they have two options. They have two options.

 

Sam Newman: The people that were here before us?

 

Thomas Sewell: The people we conquered this country off. Yes. We conquered this land off them. Yeah. By force. We took it by force. And I’m not ashamed of that. I think there’s a lot of people that are ashamed of that.

 

But I think all countries that are in existence are created through force. Every single one! I don’t think there’s One Nation that is free from the guilt of conquering a lesser people.

 

Blair Cottrell: What were we supposed to do when we arrived?:

 

“Oh, there’s already some semi-nomadic tribes here eating each other, we better go home!”

 

Sam Newman: No, that, no, no, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I believe we conquered this country.

 

Sam Newman: I’m on the record as saying that. I’m saying this country is here because of settlement.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Sam Newman: In 1788 or something. I’m saying that. And there was 150,000 Aboriginal people on 7.7 million square acres [km] of country. So hardly, we’ve hardly taken over their country. But they were the previous inhabitants. Well, well, we’ve hardly taken it over in as much as this country is what it is today because of settlement.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. I agree with that.

 

Sam Newman: So my question. Well, but that’s just a fact.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Sam Newman: Isn’t it? So what do you do with the people that were here before us who aren’t the same skin colour as the people that you prefer?

 

Thomas Sewell: My initial thought is that they should be left alone. We should stop giving them money. We should let them have their own little societies and let them govern themselves. I’m sick of playing babysitter.

 

Sam Newman: Well, how would that work? How can they govern themselves? What does that mean?

 

Thomas Sewell: What, are they not human? Are they not capable of self governance?

 

Sam Newman: Well, govern themselves where? In what cities or what?

 

Thomas Sewell: They shouldn’t be in the cities. They didn’t build them.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think Aboriginal people are our responsibility. I think they’re their own responsibility.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, this is the conversation a responsible White government that represents White people should have with a responsible body of the Aboriginals that represent Aboriginal people.

 

And then we can sit down at the table, White Australians representing White Australians, with Aboriginals representing Aboriginals, and we can have an honest conversation about how we’re going to make it work.

 

Sam Newman: So if you say we took over the country from them, why don’t we help them assimilate, seeing as we took the country off them!

 

Thomas Sewell: We’ve done that for 200 years and it hasn’t worked. I don’t think it’s the solution to the problem. I think that all people should have their own uniqueness. And if we are the true appreciators of diversity as we say we are, I don’t think we should mix everyone into one caramel people. I don’t think that’s a good policy to have. I think the Aboriginals, let them preserve their culture and their identity somewhere. All right, that conversation is on the table for later on. It’s not a conversation. I can answer right now because I don’t have control of the State Department.

 

Sam Newman: So these groups like yours. Let me tell you what your group is the National Socialist Network.

 

Thomas Sewell: Blair’s not a member.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m just an individual and I do my own media and influence, and that’s where I’m most useful. But Tom is the leader of the National Socialist Network. Yeah, we’re all colleagues, Tom and I. We came out of the United Patriot movement.

 

Sam Newman: So if I wanted to become, what criteria would I have to fulfill to become a member of the National Socialist Network? Do I have to, …

 

Thomas Sewell: You have to be White. So you have to be, …

 

Sam Newman: I’m through to the semis without dropping a set. Right. What’s the next thing?

 

Thomas Sewell: So you have to be of European descent.

 

Sam Newman: Have to like Hitler?

 

Thomas Sewell: No, you don’t have to like Hitler.

 

Sam Newman: But what I have to do? Do you have to pay money?

 

Thomas Sewell: We ask for members over The Age of 18 to pay $50 a month. I think that’s a fair fee to help run all of our training. Our physical training.

 

Sam Newman: Training?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, we do physical training. So like part of what we do as a gym club.

 

Sam Newman: Physical training? I see.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. Yes. We do exercises in the park.

 

Sam Newman: Yes, I see. So if I wanted to become a member of the National Socialist organisation. Yes. I got to be White, …

 

Thomas Sewell: And you have to be of honour. You have to be of honour!

 

Sam Newman: What does that mean?

 

Thomas Sewell: You can’t be a homosexual.

 

Sam Newman: I see!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. So we don’t accept people that don’t want to live in a healthy, homogenous White society. We don’t believe that homosexuals or people with sort of deviant sexual ideologies have a place in our organisation.

 

Sam Newman: Homosexual. Like men, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Men that have sex with other men. We don’t want anything to do with them.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s probably got something to do with the point of the community, which is to procreate and continue the existence of our people.

 

Thomas Sewell: We don’t believe they can be members of the community.

 

Sam Newman: Well, I’m not a homosexual.

 

[27:08]

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, then you can join. Obviously you’ve got contentions about Hitler.

 

Sam Newman: What we, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, so we got, …

 

Sam Newman: I have contentions about Hitler, …

 

Thomas Sewell: We have probably 25% of people interested in our community are not sure about the Hitler question. They go:

 

“I support 99% of what you guys are about, but what’s with Hitler? Why do you guys like him?”

 

And so we have this conversation like we’re having right now in good faith, and we explain what Hitler means to us. And people can be neutral about that or they can be like:

 

“Wow, I didn’t realise Hitler was so good!”

 

Or they can say:

 

“Actually, I think that’s nonsense! I’m going to believe what the TV says about Hitler and what the jews that run the education system say about Hitler, and I’m not interested in joining you guys.”

 

And that’s the conversation I have every day.

 

Sam Newman: So we have Goring and Himmler.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Sam Newman: They were his acolytes that went around the SS, …

 

Thomas Sewell: You don’t have to know that much about all that, …

 

Sam Newman: The Black Shirts, …

 

Thomas Sewell: You don’t have to have an infinite in-depth knowledge of World War II history to join our community. But what, as I said at the start of the podcast, what Hitler represents to us is not a man, but it’s an idea that we can have a triumph of our national spirit, that we don’t have to bend the knee to China or bend the knee to globalism or the UN, or the woke culture. That we can have a triumph of the Australian will, a triumph of our own folkish spirit. And that’s what Hitler tried to put forward.

 

And the other thing that he put forward was he said that:

 

“German people do not love each other enough, that we’ve got this fascination with all things foreign and we don’t have a strong enough love for our own kind.”

 

And what we want here in Australia is, okay, butter chicken is kind of nice, and Chinese food can be nice, but what we need is a love for our own people.

 

Sam Newman: Butter chicken can be nice, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Sure!

 

Sam Newman: Chinese food can be nice, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: But we need a love for our own folk. That’s what we need.

 

Blair Cottrell: For our bangers and mash [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, it’s beyond food. It’s beyond food. There needs to be a depth of patriotism and a depth of nationalism that we have respect. Young people. And you know this as a fact, Sam, young people are being raised in the schools, and there’s not a national flag in the kindergarten. I have family that work in kindergartens and primary schools.

 

Sam Newman: I’m on about that, mate!

 

Thomas Sewell: They don’t have an Aussie flag in their school. They have a transsexual flag. And personally, I would rather be speaking German than have a transsexual flag in our schools.

 

Blair Cottrell: Let’s remember why we’re here, too.

 

Sam Newman: Why are we here, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: The reason that the boys came to your attention in the first place is because they were arrested in Adelaide for marching down the street with Australian flags on Australia Day.

 

 

[See: Police arrest nationalists celebrating Australia Day in Adelaide to protect ‘survival day’ protest]

 

Sam Newman: I know. I like that. Not so much that it was the association of the Nazi salute, which is absolutely struck out from every Western society for whatever reason. Do you think that, …

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s not struck out from every single one. It’s struck out from Germany, Poland.

 

Sam Newman: American.

 

Thomas Sewell: No, it’s legal in America.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you not hear about the arrest of the seventeen gentlemen in Adelaide for celebrating Australia Day?

 

Sam Newman: What’s that Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: Seventeen, …

 

Sam Newman: Yes, I heard them. Yeah, because they were associated with a Nazi organisation.

 

Blair Cottrell: But what were they doing on the day? They were marching down the street singing Waltzing Matilda, carrying Australian flags with the purpose of celebrating Australia Day. They were arrested for loitering.

 

Sam Newman: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: And possessing a disguise which ended up being hats and sunglasses.

 

Sam Newman: And swastika, …

 

Blair Cottrell: There was no swastikas. There was no Nazi symbols.

 

Sam Newman: Weren’t they covered up?

 

Thomas Sewell: No, there was no swastikas!

 

Blair Cottrell: There was none of that.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s a complete fabrication by the media.

 

Blair Cottrell: They were targeted because of what they believe, not because of what they were doing.

 

Sam Newman: I see!

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s an interesting legal precedent for us to have to experience. Don’t you agree?

 

Thomas Sewell: The State Department, …

 

Sam Newman: People listening to this will say:

 

“You’re gradually winning me over.”

 

But you’re not! But I’m happy. I am interested in the conversation.

 

So why did you, … I’ve lost my train of thought when you said they were. Do you have, what’s the membership? No, I’m talking about being a member of the National Socialists. I’m not gay and I’m White. What else? What’s our membership? Our membership? If I pay me 50 bucks, what do you require me to do?

 

Thomas Sewell: We have layers of membership. So in terms of our activists, we’ve got about 250 activists in the country. So an activists are men that are prepared to march in the street with us, that are prepared to train with us, …

 

Sam Newman: March in the street to say:

 

“We want a White society?”

 

Thomas Sewell: Correct. Yeah. So we have 250 men.

 

Sam Newman: But that is completely pointless to do that because it’s not going to happen, is it?

 

Thomas Sewell: It will happen. Because if it doesn’t happen, …

 

Sam Newman: What, you’re going to clear out the percentage of people who aren’t White in this country. You’re going to send them home or you might gas them!

 

Thomas Sewell: No, I have no intention of gassing them. That’s clickbait.

 

Blair Cottrell: We need to be, …

 

[31:42]

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s you being cheeky, Sam.

 

Sam Newman: I’m being cheeky. How else do you get rid of people? Put them on container ships and send them, …

 

Thomas Sewell: You just put them on a plane and send them home. Every country’s done it!

 

Blair Cottrell: But there’s a process there and I think fundamentally, …

 

Thomas Sewell: America’s doing it right now!

 

Sam Newman:

 

Thomas Sewell: So why can’t we do it in Australia? Germany’s doing it right now. Austria is doing it right now. Sweden’s doing it right now. They’re all warming up. They’re all warming up the planes.

 

Blair Cottrell: Mass deportations is a popular talking point.

 

Sam Newman: No, it is Blair.

 

Thomas Sewell: And it’s inevitable. Sam, I’ll explain.

 

Sam Newman: And I’m a great fan of Trump’s, what he’s doing.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Sam Newman: I am, but, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Because he’s doing it from a popular perspective, not from a racial idea.

 

Sam Newman: But he’s not trying to make America White!

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe not in policy, but everyone knows deep down that he’s not deporting millions of White people. So even though he’s not explicitly saying it.

 

Sam Newman: Because White people aren’t pouring across the Mexican border!

 

Blair Cottrell: But what’s wrong with Australia being White? What’s wrong with that?

 

Sam Newman: No, because you know exactly what the popular opinion on that is, because it’s just racist!

 

Blair Cottrell: Why is that racist for us to have our own living space?

 

Sam Newman: Because racism is absolutely about, … Racism is if you decry, degrade or demean, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But I didn’t insinuate that. I said:

 

“Why can’t Australia just be White?”

 

That’s not about decrying or demeaning anybody.

 

Sam Newman: Because there’s probably, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Do we call Chinese people racist because they want China to be Chinese?

 

Sam Newman: No. Hang on.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why is there this double standard there? All I’m saying here, Sam, is that we need to have our own team.

 

So this thing we call life, listen, this thing we call life in politics, right, it’s a team sport. And unless we’re playing as a team, we’re not going to do any good with the competition, especially when everybody else is playing as their team.

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s not 200 million Whites in China!

 

Blair Cottrell: Let me finish.

 

Let me finish. You got Indians. They’re playing for their team.

 

Sam Newman: You stopped him speaking. You stopped me speaking before. Now you’re stopping him.

 

Blair Cottrell: Because I’m just trying to make my point. I haven’t said a lot since I’ve been on here.

 

Sam Newman: Really?

 

Blair Cottrell: So the Chinese come into Australia, they’re playing for their team. The Indians come into Australia, they’re playing for their team. They’re living with their own, they’re working with their own. Not only do we not have our own team, we’re expected to play for everybody else’s team. How long can we continue to do that and still exist as a people? I don’t want to exterminate everybody else.

 

Then there’s no competition. There’s no game at all! That’s like just because you barrack for Carlton or Geelong, you don’t want to exterminate every other team in the AFL. You just want to play as your team.

 

Sam Newman: You want to exterminate people. In inverted commas, “exterminate”, not put them in ovens. You want to exterminate everyone who’s not White from this country!

 

Blair Cottrell: No, that’s not true.

 

Sam Newman: Yes, you did say that!

 

Blair Cottrell: There needs to be a lot of people going home because a lot of people are here illegally and they shouldn’t be here.

 

Sam Newman: Yes, …

 

Blair Cottrell: A lot of people are taking advantage of our country and the financial system.

 

Sam Newman: As they do everywhere.

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re making bank from mass immigration.

 

Sam Newman: As they do everywhere.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Sam Newman: There’s a lot of people illegally in a lot of countries and ideally speaking, they should be sent home and you should get in a queue and do it properly, legally.

 

Blair Cottrell: Bloody oath! It’s a good start.

 

Thomas Sewell: I don’t want it to be a legal queue from China because they’ve got their own homeland. There’s 1.4 billion of them. They’ve got their own homeland, they’ve got their own home, they’ve got their own government that advocates for them.

 

Sam Newman: So you only want Canadians and the British and Americans to get in the queue to come here legally?

 

Thomas Sewell: I think that Europe and Western civilisation, we’re all brothers, we’re all cousins, we’re of the folk. We’re a nation, we’re related to each other. I have infinitely more in common with a White Canadian, or a White British, or a White Icelandic person. Infinitely more in common than with a Chinese person.

 

Sam Newman: Aryans!

 

Thomas Sewell: White. Yeah. Europeans, Aryans, whatever you want to describe us. Than a Chinese person with an Australian accent.

 

I have infinitely more in common with a White person on the other side of the earth than a Chinaman with an Australian accent.

 

Sam Newman: No, no. So Thomas, …

 

Thomas Sewell: And they can pretend to be us, pretend multiculturalism’s working, but it’s not! I want a home for my children!

 

Sam Newman: So, Thomas.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Sam Newman: And Blair. There’s 25 [27] million people in Australia, I presume. I’m just guessing this. I reckon half of them aren’t White.

 

Thomas Sewell: I think we’re at 60%, yeah.

 

Sam Newman: 60% are White?

 

Thomas Sewell: 60% are White, yeah.

 

Sam Newman: So you would ideally like, gradually to start the 40%, getting them out of the country.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Sam Newman: And get us down to about a 12, 13 million.

 

Thomas Sewell: The same way that it, … No, we would probably be, yeah, about 15 million. I think.

 

Sam Newman: 15 million would be happy.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. I think that’s a good starting point to then rebuild Australia.

 

[36:01]

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what the people who founded our nation, that was their vision.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. And that’s what they did. Australia, founded on that, …

 

Blair Cottrell: The Immigration Restriction Act. And Alfred Deakin, one of the first prime ministers of the Federated Australia, said that he wanted to remove all coloured peoples in our midst.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Australia was built on racism. We’re not foreign. We’re actually holding on to the true ideology that Australia was built on.

 

Sam Newman: In 19, … Prime Minister Curtin said:

 

“This country shall remain forever the home of people from the British race.”

 

That’s what he said.

 

So that was the start of the White Australia Policy. And then Harold, …

 

Thomas Sewell: It was even older than that. The White Australia Policy used to be called the Immigration Restriction Act of 1901. The Founding Fathers, like Deacon, …

 

[See: Joel Davis – The White Australia Policy with Matthew Grant – Jul 27, 2023 – Transcript]

 

Sam Newman: It was a dictation test. If you couldn’t spell or couldn’t write English, …

 

Thomas Sewell: They did that cheekily. What they would do when a non-White person. This is a fact. What they would do when a non-White person would enter Australia is they would give them the dictation test.

 

Sam Newman: That’s right.

 

Thomas Sewell: In German or Spanish or some European language that they obviously couldn’t speak.

 

Sam Newman: Or whatever.

 

Thomas Sewell: But the Immigration Restriction Act did very clearly state that they only want people of Aryan descent!

 

Sam Newman: Yes.

 

Thomas Sewell: Which back then meant European!

 

Sam Newman: One of your must read books, I presume, is Mein Kampf*, is it?

 

[* Mein Kampf is a 1925 autobiographical manifesto by Nazi Party leader Adolf Hitler. The book outlines many of Hitler’s political beliefs, his political ideology and future plans for Germany. Volume 1 of Mein Kampf was published in 1925 and Volume 2 in 1926. The book was edited first by Emil Maurice, then by Hitler’s deputy Rudolf Hess. Wikipedia]

 

Thomas Sewell: It is important Political Science. Yes, yes.

 

[See:Rethinking Mein Kampf — by Thomas Dalton]

 

Sam Newman: You’ve read Mein Kampf, have you Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I read it first when I was about, … I didn’t begin to understand it until I was about probably 20, 21 years old, but, …

 

Sam Newman: I’ve not read it. What’s it about? Hitler, just telling us what you’re telling us.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, it was written by Hitler in Landsberg Prison in 1923. So some time before he came to power. But it provides interesting insight into the guy’s psychology and the kind of man that he was and his vision for the future of Germany. And it’s one of those books. I was surprised it even existed at all, because when I was in high school I heard about nothing but gas chambers and evil Nazis! But apparently my history teacher forgot to tell me that the man behind it all wrote his own book.

 

So when I saw it on the shelf in a random bookshop in North Fitzroy, you know, somewhat trendy bookshop. So I thought I’ve got to give that a go.

 

Sam Newman: Have you two lads, gentlemen, people, been radicalised? When did you start having this philosophy about the country we live in? I don’t know how old you are.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think loving your country makes you radical. I think certain people who don’t want others to listen to us, who don’t want us, who don’t want our point to get across to a larger audience would write us off as radical, extremist or quote, unquote, “Nazi”.

 

But at the end of the day, I think what we stand for in terms of tradition, family, common sense, most people would agree on. It’s just that perspective of the Second World War and the war propaganda, the surviving war propaganda, that people would be contentious with sam Newman: So you, for want of a better word, get away with this on the basis of free speech is what you should be allowed to have. And you said you, this was nothing more than political persecution of you for having these views by people who don’t agree with you. Did you not?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Sam Newman: Yes, you did.

 

Thomas Sewell: I did say that in court.

 

Sam Newman: You did say that in court. So you think that, not to put too strong a word on it, but people would think that this is “hate speech” and you say:

 

“No, this is my privilege to have free speech and to allow to express myself. And you’re being politically persecuted for having these views and this is not right! And you’re going to test it before the courts.”

 

Blair Cottrell: What is “hate speech” other than speech that people in power don’t like?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I contest the notion that there’s even such a thing as hate speech. I hate the people who say:

 

“Burn down Australia!”

 

I think that’s hate speech.

 

Sam Newman: Do you think it’s not, now, I have no skin in the game here. I’ve said this many times. Do you think it’s not hate speech for Palestinians to walk around the community here and lock down the streets in here, shouting abuse and vile statements at people of the jewish nation, or if there is a nation from Israel, or from whatever, slagging jews? Do you think that’s hate speech and that should be allowed?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d go further and say it’s completely irrelevant to Australia. What are these people doing here in the first place?

 

Sam Newman: No, no, …

 

Blair Cottrell: If they love Palestine so much, go and fight them for Palestine. What are they doing marching through Melbourne?

 

Sam Newman: So, no, no, that’s a different argument. I take that on advisement. I’m just saying, do you think that’s not hate speech? You think the Palestinians or the jews who slag them back, backwards and forwards, at some stage you can’t say things about people or else we have a completely disjointed and dysfunctional society if you allow people to say absolutely anything they like about people in the name of free speech!

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ll say this. Free speech should only be the right of people that are of the folk. If you’re in good faith, …

 

Sam Newman: Of the, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Of the folk. Of the nation. Of the people.

 

Sam Newman: Of the folk! Yes.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, of the folk. FOLK, the people.

 

Sam Newman: That’s right.

 

[40:58]

 

Thomas Sewell: I don’t believe that Palestinians should have free speech because I don’t think they should be in the country.

 

Sam Newman: But that’s a different argument.

 

Thomas Sewell: No, it’s not a different argument, because we have to define left and right of what is free and what is not free. And I don’t believe that the left and right arc of what’s free speech and what’s hate speech should be whether the government agrees with it or not, or whether some purple head freak in the diversity departments of the government like my opinion or not. They shouldn’t decide what’s free and what’s not free.

 

What should be decided is this person of the nation and does this person have love for the nation? And if they don’t, if they want to destroy Australia, then they shouldn’t have the right to speak. We shouldn’t let them in the country.

 

Sam Newman: The government of responsibility would say if you allow hate speech to proliferate, then that just opens the gates to physical violence because it fizzes people up to the fact that they feel inadequate verbally. So they just go the old physical stuff. And that’s what the, …

 

Thomas Sewell: The government uses physical violence against me, because they don’t like my political views. The government uses physical violence against me!

 

Sam Newman: Because they the manhandled you? How did they, …

 

Thomas Sewell: We have been harassed.

 

Sam Newman: I saw a security guard ask you to leave the premises of somewhere, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Before throat punching my colleague. Yes!

 

Sam Newman: Yes. So would you, …

 

Thomas Sewell: So we’re changing topics. The subject was about free speech. So my answer about free speech is that we as Australians should have the right to freely criticise the Australian government for its treasonous decision to ethnically replace our host population.

 

Sam Newman: So Thomas, the man who asked the man who asked you to leave was of some African origin, or he was black.

 

Thomas Sewell: Correct.

 

Sam Newman: And you said to him, [chuckling] you said:

 

“Dance monkey, dance!”

 

Thomas Sewell: I didn’t, my colleague did.

 

Sam Newman: Oh, so your colleague said:

 

“Dance monkey, dance!”

 

Thomas Sewell: He started dancing! So we had left the building.

 

Sam Newman: So do you think that’s free speech?

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ll tell you the full story.

 

Sam Newman: Yes. Thank you.

 

Thomas Sewell: We left the building. He asked us to leave.

 

Sam Newman: Yes.

 

Thomas Sewell: Right after Channel Nine called us “terrorists”.

 

Sam Newman: I know.

 

Thomas Sewell: We haven’t committed any terrorism.

 

Sam Newman: Yes.

 

Thomas Sewell: And they smeared us and slandered us, and no legal defense department wants to take up us up on the offer.

 

So I went down there to make a speech, to make a point of it.

 

Sam Newman: Yes.

 

Thomas Sewell: And we got asked by security to leave. So we left. When we were outside the front of the building, I started making my speech again and we were asked not to make the speech out the front of the building, but to walk all the way to what was called the Draino line [sp].

 

Sam Newman: Yep.

 

Thomas Sewell: Right. And I asked nicely:

 

“Where is the Draino line?”

 

And he started walking us towards the Draino line. As we’re walking to the Draino line, he began dancing like a monkey. Like this?

 

Sam Newman: Yes.

 

Thomas Sewell: Mocking us! Mocking us like:

 

“Haha, you dumb White racist. I can use physical force, remove you from this building, there’s nothing you can do about it.”

 

And then while he was dancing like a monkey, my colleague said to him from the “Tones and I” song [Dance Monkey].

 

All right:

 

“Dance for me, dance for me, monkey.”

 

That Tone’s and I song, because that was popular in the media at the time. And when he said that, this African, who could not control his own behaviour, throat punched my colleague! And when he throat punched my colleague, I have a love for my colleagues and for my folk and I’m prepared to use force to protect them from violent thugs that do that.

 

And so I dropped him. Yes, I hit him, Wayne Carey* style. I smashed him. Absolutely! I absolutely smashed him! I didn’t stop smashing him until he stopped. And when he was on the ground and he stopped, I left him alone.

 

[* Wayne Francis Carey (born 27 May 1971) is a former Australian rules footballer who played with the North Melbourne Football Club and Adelaide Football Club in the Australian Football League (AFL). Carey was inducted into the AFL Hall of Fame in 2010. Although he was eligible for induction in 2008, his off-field troubles with drugs and violence delayed his induction. Wikipedia]

 

But then he wasn’t satisfied with that. He got up off the ground and tried to go again. So he got a good jab and then he went inside. He learnt his lesson.

 

Now I had to do 150 hours of knitting, as my punishment for dropping that African. But I did not, …

 

Blair Cottrell: What was that? Knitting, community service?

 

Thomas Sewell: I had to do knitting! I do 150 hours of knitting.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s a pretty wholesome community service. [chuckling]

 

Sam Newman: So!

 

Thomas Sewell: So that’s the full story.

 

Sam Newman: This almost reinforces my point that if it was considered hate speech, then it turned to violence! And the more we engage in, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Who turned it into violence?

 

Sam Newman: Maybe, maybe, I’m just saying. And then it is provocative to call a black person a monkey.

 

Thomas Sewell: Why?

 

Sam Newman: Because! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Have you done it? Did you receive violence when you called a black person a monkey?

 

Sam Newman: Well, I, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Did you receive it.

 

Sam Newman: I have never called a black person a monkey.

 

Thomas Sewell: I believe that you have.

 

Sam Newman: Have I?

 

[45:13]

 

Blair Cottrell: You suggested that George Floyd was a scoundrel and you had to, …

 

Sam Newman: I didn’t.

 

Thomas Sewell: Even when you’re on the Footy Show.

 

Sam Newman: What called someone a black person a monkey?

 

Thomas Sewell: No, sorry, not a black person. You called an Asian person a monkey. It was a Malaysian.

 

Sam Newman: Yes, I did.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, a Malaysian.

 

Sam Newman: I did.

 

Thomas Sewell: A dark person. You did so.

 

Sam Newman: No, I did. It was an Asian person. A dark person.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes, it was a dark Malaysian.

 

Sam Newman: I did. And I got reprimanded severely for that.

 

Thomas Sewell: But did you deserve violence for it? Did you deserve to be attacked by someone that lost their temper, or was there some civil process that you could go through for saying something?

 

Sam Newman: Very glad you, … You’ve done well. I’m very glad you got me on that because I did say, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Because they use violence as, …

 

Sam Newman: Just hang on. You threw me there. No, no, no, he’s good. I’m glad, you threw me. No, I was going to say to you about the black fucking monkey. What was that?

 

Oh no, George Floyd! Now I never said, George Floyd, that is the greatest bullshit I’ve ever heard in my life.

 

Thomas Sewell: I agree.

 

Sam Newman: George Floyd was a, … I got cancelled off the Footy Show for this. I know, because I said on this forum that George Floyd should not have died how he did, but he was a piece of shit!

 

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Sam Newman: He had a string of con [victions] and, …

 

Thomas Sewell: And he robbed a pregnant woman at gunpoint!

 

Sam Newman: And they burnt America down for two years. And the government let it go just in the name of Black Lives Matter which is domestic terror organisation. Some of the suburbs here out in [word unclear] they have Black Lives Matter walk and alleyways, and they have a sign up. The greatest bullshit I’ve ever heard. So George Floyd was a piece of shit, but he shouldn’t have died, probably, how he did.

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, you rightly pointed out that what began as a legitimate form of protest against police brutality morphed into something else which ended up being about racism and just an excuse to bash on White people.

 

Sam Newman: That’s right. And just a corrupt and dysfunctional organisation called Black Lives Matter, which is, …

 

Thomas Sewell: It was promoted by the mainstream media.

 

Sam Newman: Yes. All right. So, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Police took a knee for them. But the police attack us!

 

So the police take a knee for communists, black communists. But then they beat up White men. Which shows you this, the state of affairs.

 

Sam Newman: What’s that Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: This particular conversation. This point of the conversation we started at about a hate speech, didn’t we?

 

Sam Newman: And I don’t know where we started. I’ll tell you what I’m asking. It’s almost finally. Unless you like to make another three minute announcement. I’ll give you a final word. You can just go for your life and I’ll sit here.

 

Are we affiliated? Are we? I haven’t quite joined the party yet. What did we go through, what I have to do? I’m not homosexual. I’m White. What else do I have to do? Give you 50 bucks a month?

 

Thomas Sewell: You don’t have to give me 50 bucks, …

 

Sam Newman: What else do I. What else? What else do you go through?

 

Blair Cottrell: You have basic fitness standards too, don’t you?

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s layers of membership.

 

Sam Newman: So there’s an age limit?

 

Thomas Sewell: No, there’s not.

 

Sam Newman: I’m 80. Can I get in?

 

Thomas Sewell: Absolutely!

 

Sam Newman: Oh, should I? And how many members have we got? Did we ask?

 

Thomas Sewell: As I said, of activists? So our, …

 

Sam Newman: No. How many people are a member of the National Socialists?

 

Thomas Sewell: Thousands. We have thousands of supporters.

 

Sam Newman: Are they?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Sam Newman: Oh, well!

 

Thomas Sewell: How many activists do we have? The guys that train with us and the guys that march with us. About 250.

 

Sam Newman: And the idea of training and marching with you is to overthrow someone one day, is it?

 

Thomas Sewell: Not necessarily to overthrow, but to show a triumph of the will.

 

Sam Newman: Right.

 

Thomas Sewell: I think that masculinity is under attack.

 

Blair Cottrell: To have a have a team too.

 

Sam Newman: You’re not part of it, you’re just in here as a guest.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m very much part of it.

 

Sam Newman: Oh, you are. You see, you tried to disassociate yourself!

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m not a direct member, but I work with the community.

 

Sam Newman: Beautiful!

 

Blair Cottrell: And I’m good at it.

 

Sam Newman: Now, are we affiliated with like minded neo-Nazis overseas?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Sam Newman: Are you?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Sam Newman: Do you have Skype meetings?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Sam Newman: Do you go over and join their celebrations or marches?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes.

 

Sam Newman: Do they come here?

 

Thomas Sewell: Not many have come here.

 

Sam Newman: They wouldn’t get in!

 

Thomas Sewell: Australia’s a hard place to get into unless you’re brown. [Sam chuckles]

 

But yeah, we certainly, we’re a global movement. We’re a global movement of nationalists that want each of, … Because there’s no homeland for White people anywhere. Australia is not an isolated incident. This is happening in England, in Germany, in France, in America. Every White country is losing their homeland!

 

So White people all around the world are realizing we’re the only ones that are having diversity thrusted upon us. Every other group gets their homeland plus they get to come here.

 

So we’re getting colonised. We’re getting reverse colonised. Through subversion. Through subversion!

 

[See: Poseidon — Replacement Migration Agenda – United Nations — TRANSCRIPT]

 

[49:48]

 

Sam Newman: So basically you want to overthrow society with a White revolution?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, look, we need a spiritual revolution.

 

Sam Newman: You seem to be disagreeing with it because that was one of your quotes. Not yours [Blair’s]. This is one of his quotes.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think it’s a step by step process and like if we can remove the illegal immigrants first.

 

Sam Newman: You wanted to buy a plot of land out in the country and settle it with White people.

 

Thomas Sewell: Absolutely! I want to have a home.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d rather us be in control of our own country. If that’s not possible, then maybe we have to look at separating.

 

Sam Newman: Right oh. Now look.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I think there’s two primary methods of how we go about this, and neither of them are this kind of fantasy that you’re alluding to, that we’re just going to become armed one day and just start randomly killing people. I don’t think that’s in our interest.

 

Sam Newman: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Sorry, I’ll say it again.

 

Sam Newman: For God’s sake, I’ll hate to miss any of this, mate. It would be pointless doing this.

 

Thomas Sewell: Okay, I’ll say it again quickly. I think there’s two possibilities. One, we take state power through the methods that are available to us within the democracy. The other, if we’re unable to do that, is to separate, is to build.

 

Sam Newman: The only way we take you, take state power, is to put yourself up for pre-selection at local council, state government and federal government and see how you go.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, over the next five years, you might see that.

 

Sam Newman: No, you might. Yeah. Well, now, look.

 

Thomas Sewell: But I want to build a foundation first before I run, before we run anyone as a political, …

 

Sam Newman: You seem to be not happy with the way this started, Blair. How should I end it? What should I say? How should we end this?

 

Blair Cottrell: I think it’s, …

 

Sam Newman: Should I thank you very much for both coming in. I’m not sure that I agree with anything you say, but you might be surprised that I agree with a lot of it. But that will be in the eye of the beholder or the ear of the listener! But I do know why now, you are intent on being anti-social and being so disruptive amongst the mainstream. But you’ve pointed out the mainstream are biased in certain way they report things. And I think this has been a worthwhile chat to both of you.

 

I can assure you that none of this will be edited. And this will. This will go on our podcast and you people can watch you and you and me having a chat about something.

 

Is there anything else you’d like to say?

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re a good sport for having us on, Sam. I really didn’t expect to be sitting here with you, so it’s a great opportunity.

 

But I think I’d just like to wrap it up by reiterating the point I made about Aussies playing as a team. It was the original team, the original Australians, that built this country. And we need to start thinking more collectively again because everyone else is doing that. Until we get our team back and we start playing as a team, we’re not going to have much of a future. And we need to send back the illegals, people who shouldn’t be here, people who are exploiting Australia. They need to go home. And we need representation for White Aussies.

 

Sam Newman: Right oh, …

 

Blair Cottrell: At the end of the day that’s all, …

 

Sam Newman: That’s enough, Blair, please. Thank you.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why is that enough?

 

Sam Newman: Because you now, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Am I making too much sense? [chuckling]

 

Sam Newman: No, this is now becoming a political speech. No, that’s good.

 

Thomas? What do you want to say? Anything else?

 

Thomas Sewell: I appreciate you giving us, …

 

Sam Newman: Yeah, good on it.

 

Hey, Blair and Thomas, thank you for coming in and being part of You Cannot Be Serious. I’ll probably get the biggest kick. You never know. I mightn’t get a kicking. They might, people might find this actually reasonably interesting no matter what they think about what you’ve been doing.

 

So thank you very much. I appreciate it.

 

Thomas Sewell: We love our country.

 

[53:13]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

YouTube Comments

top

(Comments as of 2/7/2025 = 1,823)

@aethulwulfvonstopphen8013
3 days ago
Imagine a country where White people loved and cared for White people
726

18 replies

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
Yeah and where we weren’t humilated by foreign groups.
65

@aethulwulfvonstopphen8013
2 days ago

@LordOfSweden Our day is coming brother
35

@bperez8656
2 days ago
Australians are cooked
Yall call free speech a “privilege” and not a human right.
You have so much to learn from the American constitutional republic system of govt
Democracy is a tyranny of the majority
A constitutional republic is governed by god given rights and laws that CANNOT be infringed.
8

@Robert13732
2 days ago
It’s not allowed because of a pile of shoes.
38

@Orxbane
2 days ago
@Robert13732 Not the shoes. It should be called the Shoeah.
4

@Dan-TheOracle
1 day ago
@bperez8656 there is a man rotting away in prison with a 400 year sentence for wrongthink in America right now… You have no clue what you are talking about.
4

@Dan-TheOracle
1 day ago
@Robert13732 you think the shoes are bad? Have you seen the piles of laptops and cell phones? How were they even meant to tiktok while in the camps? Tragedy.
4

@neilr4867
1 day ago
Unstoppable.

@Mike-pf1ru
1 day ago
@Dan-TheOracle Who is the guy in prison?

@SavesWhiteLives
1 day ago
After going through the Indoctrination System, I have no idea what you are talking about.

@pelagonianlion8276
1 day ago
Imagine even more a country that loves all people as the image of God.
2

@SavesWhiteLives
1 day ago
@pelagonianlion8276 A world, not a country.

@pelagonianlion8276
1 day ago
@SavesWhiteLives What do you categorise as white? Where do you draw the line where white ends and non white begins?

@Mike-pf1ru
1 day ago
@aethulwulfvonstopphen8013 If you go back through your ancestry 500 years to the year 1525, say 20 generations, you have 1,048,576 direct ancestors. Over a million people in 1525 contributed to you being here today. That’s just 20 generations. 21 generations ago, say in the year 1500, that’s 2,097,152 direct ancestors. There’s a high likelihood that all of us have some Jew or Persian blood in our family trees. No one is purely “white”.

@LAMethWitch
13 hours ago
Sounds great

@kalinkalass1877
12 hours ago
​ @pelagonianlion8276 White could mean strictly people of European ancestry/blood.
In these circles it usually does.

@clayton.stewart
10 hours ago
Why has it become so offensive to be a white nationalist?

@r9715
9 hours ago
Literally heaven

@hadzic4512
3 days ago
The media have called Thomas and Blair every name in the book, but they have never called them liars. Let that sink in.
965

23 replies

@LordOfSweden
3 days ago
All they can do is throw names, same in Europe and all over.
47

@Shblibble
3 days ago
What the hell are you talking about?! Yes they have. Heaps of times! What planet are you on?!
1

@michaelirish1445
3 days ago
@Shblibble You and I may not agree with them, but name one lie? or are you no better than the MSM?
31

@Shblibble
3 days ago
@michaelirish1445 Dude, I have tried 3 times to reply to you. Youtube keeps censoring me!
This is a test message….
2

3 days ago
@Shblibble Surrre
14

@Shblibble
3 days ago
The point I’m trying to make is….. go ask your great-grandpa who fought in WW2 what he thinks of these guys……
1

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
@Shblibble What are they saying that is a lie then?
13

@Shblibble
2 days ago

@ That is one hell of a rewrite of history. You are a lost cause.

@charltoncorbett2973
2 days ago
@LordOfSweden ”Tell me where’s the lie?”
A : “that’s the worst rewrite of history ever” classic
10

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago

@ Dunning-Kruger.
3

@dima_r6
2 days ago
They are heroes
7

@Shblibble
2 days ago
@LordOfSweden whatever it takes to make Adolf the good guy right?

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago

@ Look at Europe. Is that what winning looks like?
16

@Shblibble
2 days ago
@LordOfSweden The fact you have a problem with it says everything.

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
​@ A problem with what exactly?
9

@Comatosedpeanut
2 days ago
@Shblibble goober
8

@scorpio8963
2 days ago
@Shblibble My Great Grandfathers did not fight for a future where their descendants are a minority in our countries. It’s common sense.
26

@stuffthatijustsay5523
2 days ago
@charltoncorbett2973 Can anyone else see who he’s replying to? Or is that one down the memory hole?

@jordane19969
1 day ago
They destroyed our state minnesota, too. Only one of the few white people whenever I go to a store in or near Minneapolis. Completely unrecognizable now
8

@Orxbane
1 day ago

@ The great-grandpa that fought on the wrong side? We lost that war, only the small hats won.
4

@Orxbane
1 day ago

@ You mean saying the small hat myth is a small hat myth? No one ever took a final shower.
1

@Orxbane
1 day ago

@ He was the good guy
2

@TriggerJim88
3 hours ago
WOah. Deep without the meaningful.

@IRELANDAMERICAUK
3 days ago
Thomas and Blair are legends
619

@alisonmckie5717
3 days ago
These young men are saying what many are scared to say. They are clearly and articulately stating what is happening to Australia and all Western countries. Very interesting interview.
575

3 replies

@007lyse
3 days ago
I’ve been racist for decades. Lol. 40+ yrs ago I claimed that black people are black & white ppl are white so we are different. Compare that to birds. Not all birds are same color. Since then Ive been called every other name in the book BC I never go along with the current thing. Funny how when opposing views
are heard ppl start to flail with ad hominems or swears in the midst of cognitive dissonance. Good on you Thomas & Blair. I’m trying to tell the truth of flat earth. Wish me luck. Lol
21

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
@007lyse so brave old man… so brave.. see you in 15 years or no?
1

@suad01
3 days ago
@007lyse Mohammed Ali would agree with you
7

@JeffarryLounder
3 days ago
I’m gonna be honest, these are quite-literally the only people in Australia right now who are prioritising the REAL Australians first, and the fact that they have been shunned and censored so much is a sign to how little freedom we ever had to begin with.
955

12 replies

@lexingtonconcord8751
3 days ago

54

@travv88
3 days ago
exactly
46

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
The cool guy club
8

@Palendrome
2 days ago
You have to support them, the movement is growing there
13

@ALS_AustNZ
2 days ago

4

@MarketInsights-jq3cl
2 days ago
There is no freedom in Australia, that’s why I left.
3

@James_744
1 day ago
@JeffarryLounder real
1

@mayomonkey420
1 day ago
jailed…

@danas3765
1 day ago
Yea….we know

@madeleinethornton-smith1761
16 hours ago
First Australians are the real Australians

@thatonebtsfan
42 minutes ago
the real australians? so the aboriginals? yall have no shame

@JeffarryLounder
37 minutes ago
@thatonebtsfan Be real: we are the real Aussies. There was no concept of an “Australian” before we came. The land we call Australia today was a barren land of warring tribes at best. They were only allowed to be called fellow “Australians” under our kindness and nothing more.

@IbizaPalms
3 days ago
I send my fullest support for Thomas Sewell and his movement in Australia! Greetings from Rome, Italy. Hail Victory!
540

6 replies

@matt79hz
3 days ago

20

@stoveone4031
3 days ago
Presente!
14

@ThomasCourchesne
2 days ago
HAIL VICTORY!
10

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago (edited)
To victory, youu look like a syrian tho
3

@Drvol1
2 days ago
@LordOfSweden LordofSweden lol. Francesco Totti and Daniele De Rossi are from Rome. They look a lot whiter than Alicia Vikander. Stop being divisive.
6

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
@Drvol1 Alicia Wikander clearly has some kind of other ethnic background that Swedish though, so that’s not strange.
Also it’s an average, not single individuals we’re speaking about.
I speak from proof, logic and history. Try doing the same.
1

@TheMogician
3 days ago
Good on you for having the balls to do this, Sam. It is ridiculous that even talking to people should require such courage in a so-called “free country”.
263

@neilr4867
3 days ago
We are losing our cultural identity. Vast swathes of our cities are mostly Indian. Why is it “wrong” to not want your country to be like this? I miss the Australia we had.
503

15 replies

@Heimbach1966
3 days ago
Should of fought harder, you had plenty of warning
7

@damachinen
3 days ago
​@Heimbach1966 So it all over, then? Nothing can be done about it..? Nonsense. One generation has sold out the Australian people, another generation is trying to fix the problems.
44

@Heimbach1966
3 days ago
@damachinen
Did I say that ? You’re crying on the Internet about whats happening when I can almost gaurentee you’ve never been out with any active club or NS group.
8

@neilr4867
3 days ago
​ @Heimbach1966 it’s “should have”, not “should of”. English your second language?
10

@Heimbach1966
3 days ago
@neilr4867
Should of fought harder buddy. Now you cry on YouTube hahahaha

@brayofficial2160
3 days ago
​ @Heimbach1966 judging by your username that you’re a boomer I’m guessing?
14

@n8errific
3 days ago
@Heimbach1966
Yeah! we, people who were born in the 80’s and 90’s, should have fought harder against the anti-Australian subversion that started two decades before we were born.
We play the hand we are dealt.
19

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Enjoys a sneaky curry or kebab on the weekend when the ‘ball and chai ‘ lets em out… based af
1

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
​ @n8errific
Precisely
4

@neilr4867
3 days ago
@n8errific 100%. We’re dealing with the shit left by the Lib/Lab uniparty and their rusted on voters who have destroyed this country. They all need to go.
7

@Dorian-pn5rc
2 days ago
Same happening here in Britain, Ireland and most of Europe
5

@Beva-c8j
1 day ago
@n8errific we are doing it NOW, its OUR time. Boomers failed, Gen X failed. Its the Xennials doing the heavy lifting — and we will not stop.
4

@n8errific
1 day ago
@Beva-c8j I don’t know if you believe in the Bible at all but a common theme is the God wants the older siblings to help the younger. As a millennial and a believer I try to help my younger siblings. You are the future. I pray you are successful.

@jolheb9091
22 hours ago
Lots of Muslim populated areas you cannot enter now either
2

@anniew4105
1 hour ago
@neilr4867 it’s actually either

@mrx6682
3 days ago
When freedom of speech is allowed, NS always wins
509

6 replies

@BiancaZombie
3 days ago
Yep, its that simple
46

@servando6074
3 days ago
En todo occidente padecemos las mismas politicas. El pueblo elegido lo controla todo. Saludos desde España. 88
26

@JHS-2
2 days ago
1000.000.000.000%
5

@Phoenix-pl6ys
2 days ago
Always
4

@Heismytopguy
2 days ago
Greetings from America our population is about 60% white right now too I think all white countries are facing the same problem
11

@danas3765
1 day ago
​@Heismytopguy you’ve noticed the pattern. Now ask yourself why, who benefits
1

@StirlingCooper
3 days ago
Good on you Sam, don’t let anyone bully you into not expressing your freedom of speech
516

11 replies

@AnnoyedFieldHockey-dk1fm
3 days ago
didn’t know you were this based Stirling.
39

@StirlingCooper
3 days ago

@
31

@JetsFan123-y4e
3 days ago

@AnnoyedFieldHockey-dk1fm Being a pornstar is antithetical to the worldview of the 2 men on this show… not very based
24

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Oh no.. don’t bully old white men.. based af

@curedbybp3003
2 days ago (edited)
BWC nietzschean energy
1

@darriusjeddburgh6316
2 days ago
although there are those { with small hats} who will say ” free for me but not for thee”.
8

@allisonhughes4348
1 day ago
Set your watch to the bald 40-something guy with the facial hair and tate complex to offer his support

@StirlingCooper
1 day ago
@JetsFan123-y4e retired and repenting
7

@thatonebtsfan
42 minutes ago
@StirlingCooper repenting? your content doesn’t look that

@StirlingCooper
20 minutes ago
@thatonebtsfan How so?

@thatonebtsfan
11 minutes ago

@ lustful content bro shame shouldn’t be that hard

@tourdetrance24
3 days ago
Both Tom and Blair make good points, why are western countries the only ones forced to accept multiculturalism ? when was there ever a referendum on immigration in Australia ?
Multiculturalism and endless immigration have been forced onto Australians not for the better and we have had enough.
400

3 replies

@wattosacrim
3 days ago
Australia for the white man.
We are not the worlds shitting bowl
680

4 replies

@Dan-TheOracle
1 day ago
The rest must go
13

@danas3765
1 day ago
Not their babysitters.
2

@pelagonianlion8276
23 hours ago
@danas3765 you, Danas, are not who’s baby sitter?

@danas3765
11 hours ago
@pelagonianlion8276 3rd
1

@darrensmith88008
3 days ago
Now we know why Blair and Tom are so censored. They are running rings around the most rebellious boomer Australia has to offer Thank you for giving them a fair go though Sam!
280

@bethannodwell
3 days ago
Thomas and Blair are absolute chads who have the spirit to save Australia
150

@jaysungardiner967
3 days ago
Based free speech enjoyer.
303

@CanadianGirlRevenge
3 days ago
I really respect these men for standing up for their country and people
224

@BiancaZombie
3 days ago
Free speech must be defended. Great to hear diversity of thought.
289

2 replies

@DuerstMania
2 days ago
Free speech raythith
4

@BiancaZombie
2 days ago

@DuerstMania \¥/
3

@rossf4196
3 days ago
Hail victory
240

@codesTD
3 days ago
good on you Sam for having the integrity for not editing this
281

3 replies

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
He is just soooooooooook brave
2

@MagicManintheSky
3 days ago
He did however shout them down and speak over them many times…..as well as injecting sneaky trigger words now and then. Keep it real.
16

@codesTD
2 days ago
@MagicManintheSky Come on mate, go easy on him, clearly his full of lead poisoning and Pfizer boosters of course he was always going to boomer out in the interview. Im just trying to affirm him for at least giving them a platform, give the guy some slack.
22

@MaxRuffian
3 days ago
You’re bloody legend Sam, I thoroughly enjoyed this interview. I loved the AFL analogy from Blair. We need our own team.
236

3 replies

@libertus8924
3 days ago
Sad that Sam is considered a legend when he’s so desperate to appear that he doesn’t agree with what these two gentlemen are saying and cutting Blair off when he made a very good point about white people needing to become a team.
26

@Seánybruv
2 days ago
The White team
3

@stuffthatijustsay5523
2 days ago
@libertus8924 I respect him purely for having the balls to have them on. When sky news dared to have Blair on TV 6 years ago, heads rolled in the boardroom. While a podcast is not quite the same, Sam is still a big name from TV land, and he took a risk by inviting them on. The jevvs will still try and close his bank accounts or cancel him just for giving them a broader platform
4

@LogicaIn
3 days ago
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
Thank you, gentlemen!
156

1 reply

@Orxbane
2 days ago
I’m surprised this actually made it past the Yewtube censors for me to see.
4

@iSpike
3 days ago (edited)
“WE LOVE OUR COUNTRY”
100% well done by Sam & his two guests. Three AUSSIE MEN speaking TRUTH, sometimes the TRUTH hurts.
WAKE UP AUSTRALIA!
109

@lioncross1849
3 days ago
Great interview. A lot of sense coming from the guests.
418

4 replies

@aperson7368
3 days ago
Thanks Vegito
10

@theREELdogman
3 days ago
Show us super homophobia 3
4

@bobbybob-w4p
2 days ago
@theREELdogman Why are you gay
1

@theREELdogman
2 days ago

@ don’t make me hate crime

@southern-samurai
3 days ago
If indigenous are given billions a year for their own land for their own people, how is it wrong for us host Australians to demand the same of our own country?
131

1 reply

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Are you living on planet earth

@georgetaylor9154
3 days ago
I also remember seeing those piles of dead bodies on the wagons, being told they were jews going to the ovens in high school history. Later to learn those exact pictures were actually just dead Germans civilians after the Dresden fire bomb raid.
315

8 replies

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
@georgetaylor9154
Wow! I remember when I was able to post such things in YT comments.
Now I’d be fortunate if even this reply wasn’t censored.
23

@birchtreebattle7153
3 days ago
@1neAdam12 we can’t let that stop us from speaking the truth
10

@Hank-ii7pn
3 days ago
That’s messed up.
4

@thought_criminal14
3 days ago
Everything’s just upside down, isn’t it
12

@stuffthatijustsay5523
2 days ago
@1neAdam12 yeah I’d get an instant 24 hour ban for that lmao. I’d have to disguise words like “jevv” to even make it post temporarily
3

@mijellonbooth8797
2 days ago
Good work, Sam. Tom / Blair, you have my support on a lot of it before and even more now
1

@DerekGlaubitz-d8t
1 day ago
The victors write the history books
1

@cybergun01
20 hours ago
@birchtreebattle7153 True, but many of us now have to speak in code to get around it. It appears censorship has levels per person, i’m assuming how long and how many comments we’ve made over time that get flagged

@cragtitlar8500
3 days ago
I found Tom and Blair to be highly commendable individuals. You guys definitely have my support.
162

@gailash1170
3 days ago
Sam I am 72 and followed your career as well as you being on the footy show
However I don’t like Australia now and worry about the future of my 8 grand children . Please rewatch the interview , the men and they are MEN make sense . I am a big supportive of them
No one else speaks up and are scared to. They are brave and ANZACS
243

8 replies

@JoshLevo
3 days ago
Spread the word to your grandchildren and support us then. Do something
41

@gailash1170
3 days ago

@ really?
4

@HP66856
3 days ago
WELL SAID These men speak sense.
28

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
I cannot wait for your grand kids to wish you farewell old thoughts

@dwillbecancelledsoon4086
2 days ago
Well said. This is why i began following their podcasts on Odysee and Rumble, and subscribed to their channels on telegram.
When mainstream media tries to censor a group so much, you know they must be speaking the truth
20

@Seánybruv
2 days ago
Good on you
11

@layersoftruth8115
2 days ago
Grandma Waffen
11

@ThomasShelby6213
11 hours ago
We’ve got the best grandmas, don’t we folks?
2

@southern_fryd
3 days ago
Blood and Honour
226

1 reply

@followerofthetrain6336
2 days ago
@southern_fryd cool pfp. I love and hate it at the same time
2

@Sakurabreeze4
3 days ago
that was a great interview. it is recommended to all the doubters out there to look up British historian ‘David irving’.
233

6 replies

@davidspencer8087
3 days ago
And Ernst Zundel.
23

@Jim-yk9zw
3 days ago
Hail Ursula Haverbeck!
19

@dwillbecancelledsoon4086
2 days ago
The documentary “Eur0pa: the Iast battIe” is fantastic too
24

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
Or Stu Peter’s…
Occupied.
3

@danas3765
1 day ago
F. Leuchter
2

@gepettosplaylists
19 hours ago
@danas3765 Yes, Fred too
1

@Toleich
3 days ago
These two are just saying what a lot of people think and talk about in private.
What a shameful time when you need to be brave to speak up for your country.
73

@darrensmith88008
3 days ago
Getting in quick before it is removed. Great interview! Shame Blair’s interview on Sky News never made it to air
128

@TangoRomeoAU
3 days ago
Great episode, was intersting to hear this convo happen in good faith. Props to giving the lads a chance to speak.
116

@MsJackamara
3 days ago
Well would you look at that, two men speaking up for white Australia, what a breath of fresh air. Thanks Sam for airing this interview, taking a leap where others fear to tread. Respect to Thomas and Blair.
75

@mrmoney2249
3 days ago
Time will prove Tom and Blair right. Let’s hope they save Australia before it’s too late.
198

2 replies

@Lugh666
3 days ago
These men are true Australians! It’s good to let them speak their minds.
73

@fishsteak3246
3 days ago
Last time I visited an Australian public school I walked into the office and there was a wall that contained all the class captains of each year. Not a SINGLE one was an actual Aussie or European, every single one was an immigrant. Tax paying Aussies are being forced to pay for being ethnically replaced.
No one likes being radical outcasts, but it is a reaction to the extreme circumstances we find ourselves in. How can you not be horrified knowing that we went from being 100% Australian and the lucky country to only 60%!!!!!! Australian and one of the most unaffordable places to live in the world, with that number set to keep on getting worse without us even getting a say.
Aussies are not able to buy land, we’re watching the country we grew up in become something unrecognizable, and these people are some of the only ones actually doing anything about it. What do you expect the disenfranchised Aussies having our country ripped away from us to do?!
209

2 replies

@michaelsuncle5085
3 days ago
Same as here in nz,i have painted afew kindergarten schools in various areas of Christchurch and the number of non whites in the classes has got way out of hand
15

@DerekGlaubitz-d8t
1 day ago

@ThomasShelby6213
3 days ago
Hail Tom and NSN o/
281

3 replies

@codesTD
3 days ago
o/
9

@theREELdogman
3 days ago
I love millhouse
1

@ChudRevolutionary1488
3 days ago
o/
8

@701splinter
3 days ago
These guys are the only sane voices in Australian politics today.
116

1 reply

@snowpalace423
4 hours ago
What??

@southern-samurai
3 days ago (edited)
Yes. Australia for the Anglos. We can’t even afford to live in a community of our own kind in our own country anymore.
225

3 replies

@Cp041
3 days ago
Australia for all Europeans. Not just Anglo’s
6

@fyrdman2185
2 days ago
@Cp041 Nah

@Cp041
2 days ago (edited)
@fyrdman2185 why?
A lot of the what you would call “wogs” that were born and bred here have great grandparents and grandparents parents who fought on the axis side in WW2 and those ideas and beliefs are still held onto very strongly 2-3 generations later. The “wogs” I know, myself included all born here but proud of our European heritage are more patriotic and nationalistic then the “aussies” I know. What our great grandparents and grandparents believed in and fought for, we still believe in the same ideas, we just apply it to our, Australia.
1

@CodexIndia1
3 days ago
Ground breaking interview. Amazing stuff.
184

2 replies

@suad01
3 days ago
We need a follow up where they can flesh out the big points.
7

@Orxbane
2 days ago
@suad01 They’ll never be invited back on.
2

@gnosticacademy
12 hours ago
Did I just become a Nazi? Lol.
Mad respect to Blair and Tom.
16

@aussiegodx8629
3 days ago
They have some great points, very interesting tbh
137

1 reply

@Thunderstriker88
9 hours ago
Watch Europa the Last Battle

@WhiteDrake77
3 days ago
Can Sam answer: If over the next 200 years Australia for whatever reason between immigration and birthrates drops to 10% white/European, is it still Australian?
Is Japan still Japanese if it’s 70% Indian?
134

5 replies

@matt79hz
3 days ago
This needs to be a pinned comment
23

@andypandy-qz5om
3 days ago (edited)
I have an Indian friend who wants Australia and New Zealand to remain supermajority White as it was when she was a girl in the 50s. She’s not stupid and knows full well what’s in store if her guys take over.
19

@LZBlackDog71
2 days ago
@andypandy-qz5om unfortunately they wanna deport your friend even though it sounds she has assimilated and become Australian

@Orxbane
2 days ago
@andypandy-qz5om Then why doesn’t she help that happen and leave?
2

@TerminallyCh1ll
1 day ago
@LZBlackDog71 no such thing as assimilation
2

@napalmwarfare740
3 days agoAUSTRALIA FOR THE WHITE MAN!
THE REST MUST GO!
296

4 replies

@wrongthink1212
3 days ago
This is an issue with the movement, though. Like everyone not 100% White must leave ? Is this actually the goal ? What about Abos or 50%ers or others with no other citizenship ? Can you not be pro-White and anti-immigration, even an area of the country for only White people, but without making it sound like you want to do total ethnic cleansing or something ?
5

@AntipodeanRose
3 days ago
​ @wrongthink1212 Even 12.5% non-founding stock is considered unacceptable. Reach your own conclusions. Tried to state the obvious in a previous reply. Evidently, that’s not allowed here. Wonder why?
5

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
​ @AntipodeanRose It’s that ALL or nothing attitude that will trip you up.
(The previous comment had a valid point.)
1

@AntipodeanRose
1 day ago
@gepettosplaylists Lol. That’s their policy, not my personal opinion.
1

@hangingwithmatty9465
3 days ago
Please watch:
Europa, the last battle
59

2 replies

@brent5310
1 day ago
Game-changer of a documentary. Lots of valuable insights that explain WWII and our modern era. It all just makes so much more sense after watching it.
3

@KingHiPoint
4 hours ago
​@brent5310 once you watch it, it’s is impossible to go back
1

@Metal_V.2
3 days ago (edited)
well done Sam. I bet you are more than a little surprised and just how much support these Aussie Patriots have from fellow Aussies and around the world.
70

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
You can see Sam glitching out when he’s asked point blank “why is it bad if Australia is white”
74

4 replies

@Keribou109
2 days ago
Loads of visible brain glitches haha
20

@James_744
1 day ago
He kinda came around though I think deep down he likes both Tom and Blair but the boomer mentality is utterly insufferable

@pattycrabby9749
1 day ago

@James_744 he did not “come around”, his follow up video he calls them turds and parasites…
5

@samsonn94
1 day ago
@pattycrabby9749 nah he chickened out from the backlash
2

@WitchHunterSiegfried88
3 days ago
Always nice to see /ourguys/ on shows like this.
95

@user-vt4gm4qq9p
2 days ago
The biggest number of views
on this content creators channel are for this interview.
Looks like people are interested in what is being discussed.
72

1 reply

@danielarcher1459
1 day ago
Exactly. I haven’t seen the like/dislike ratio but I bet it’s >95% positive. There is a huge demand for this conversation amongst the people – it is the elephant in the room that no-one’s talking about! The regime only allows the conversation to go one way right now and that has to change.
2

@frankplissken143
3 days ago
Wow. I came here expecting a “Romper Stomper” kind of show and left wanting to join them.
Not a single point they made is objectionable.
They are serious men that will become important leaders in the future.
73

1 reply

@Thunderstriker88
9 hours ago
Watch Europa the Last Battle to learn more
1

@AusCaesarist
3 days ago
Very bold interviewing these gents and you should be commended. It’s always worth speaking to people who present challenging ideas. Especially when the mainstream zeitgeist believes in censorship
81

@weaponxiv9701
3 days ago
Pair of legends right there
73

@andrewmatthews2092
3 days ago
Go Sam, bloody legend pushing back on MSM
101

@reaperanon979
3 days ago
Righteous stuff, thanks for the interview!
97

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
Heres a question;
Is Europe not diverse?
Dozens of countries, languages, cuisines, histories, national dress
Is that not already multi-cultural?
And
Red, blonde, brunette, black hair
Blue, green, hazel, grey, violet, brown eyes
Is that not a “people of colour”?
So what do they mean when they say white European Australia needed to be more diverse?
And that we needed to be multi-cultural, when we had Polish, Italian, Greek, British, German and Irish communities here already?
Diversity meant “brown skin black hair”
Multi cultural meant “not white European”
We WILL have either a white Australia or a brown one
There is no in between
50

1 reply

@lukavidic9990
2 days ago
It was diverse, now Paris, London, and Berlin look quite alike.
6

@colinwhite71
3 days ago
It was really great that you put this interview up and to be able to hear both Tom and Blair’s perspective.
It is so tiresome to just hear the MSM and politicians kvetch and tell the Australian people what to think.
61

@thanoscr7939
3 days ago
While the interrupting was annoying as fuck, I’m glad you had them on.
143

12 replies

@KS-yg9jr
3 days ago
Almost unwatchable with all the interrupting.
20

@martinpospisil3747
3 days ago
He has no logical arguments against their points so he has to constantly interrupt. That his only option really.
41

@Blackdeathgaming-yv1kk
3 days ago
@martinpospisil3747 he’s a boomer though, so it’s sorta forgiven. i have a soft spot for old people.
12

@KS-yg9jr
3 days ago

@ 100%
2

@Starnzee
3 days ago
He spoiled the whole conversation, condesening, interupting, clearing no idea at all. He needs the wake up and open his mind or stop doing this. Go back to playing football dude you’re a lousy interviewer. Couldn’t even finish this because of him.
18

@dogman17
2 days ago
I think he’s just trying to save face and avoid seeming like he agrees with them, it was also clever how he came from the angle of “if I was to join” and then realised he meets all the criteria showing that most of them are just Aussies that love Australia not skinhead Nazis.
10

@thanoscr7939
2 days ago
@dogman17 It’s strange that he’s all about free speech and had them on to let them speak, but then interrupted them constantly to stop them from speaking. At least he eased off it when Tom pointed it out.
5

@dogman17
2 days ago
@thanoscr7939 I mean he’s done a complete back flip on x, claimed Blair was an uninvited opportunist that forced his way onto the show. Tom and Blair have since been banned from X presumably due to some kind of string pulling from this coward.
7

@John-iy7xo
2 days ago
Just started and he interrupted them first answer. Is it all like this?
4

@KS-yg9jr
2 days ago

@ Yes. Tom and Blair get minimal time to explain their points. Sam was exercising some ‘soft censorship’, and obedience signalling, that’s for sure.
5

@Orxbane
2 days ago
@Blackdeathgaming-yv1kk Why? They’re part of the reason we are in this mess in the first place. They guzzled down the small hat programming and ran with it.
1

@bobbybob-w4p
2 days ago
@Starnzee he’s almost 80
for the 1st time in his life he had to defend woke multicult against 24/7 seasoned final boss professional racists
he tried to trap them then when demolished pivoted to stupid sarcastic membership questions
1

@JP-vj7fp
2 days ago
The guests are totally and completely correct.
32

@Jordan-ey5vd
2 days ago
Europeans deserve our homelands, free from foreign influence.
27

@Vril_Seeker
3 days ago
Don’t miss their live streams on Rumble and Odysee on Thursday nights!
149

6 replies

@gailash1170
3 days ago
I am a boomer and watch it week. Very intelligent men with a wonderful purpose
27

@Orxbane
2 days ago
@gailash1170 Always nice to find a boomer that understands the JQ instead of running away from it.
3

@quentinstacy35
1 day ago
What is the channel called? Thanks.
2

@Orxbane
1 day ago

@ Joel Davis. He does it with Blair and Tom shows up most of the time as well.
2

@matthewharrison8940
1 day ago
what is the name of the channel?
1

@brent5310
1 day ago
What channel(s)? Haven’t found any yet.
1

@NEKROLUST
3 days ago
Amazing stuff guys.
91

@HardlinersParadise
2 days ago
This Thomas and Blair are making complete sense, im glad i heard these two men talk to Sam, they are extremely passionate in defending Australia and its true identity.
40

1 reply

@Thunderstriker88
9 hours ago
Watch Europa the Last Battle if you’d like to learn more

@imperialhonorguard1483
3 days ago
Support from America. Australians must uphold their right to free speech.
57

@WhiteDrake77
3 days ago
I’d like to hear more from these guys, why does every other group get to play for their own team except ours?
244

@HP66856
3 days ago
Thank you, Sam, for having the courage to bring these two men in. They represent what a lot of us think but have been browbeaten into silence. Good job Tom and Blair – you have my respect
53

1 reply

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Oh wow he is so brave to admit his bias.. so brave.. you too troll

@Researchthejoos
3 days ago
Good stuff lads
81

@mitchbrown3911
3 days ago
They gradually won me over! Erudite young men.
70

1 reply

@Thunderstriker88
9 hours ago
Watch Europa the Last Battle to learn more

@np8814
7 hours ago
These guys are spot on with everything they said, This is what true Australian leadership looks like.
4

@MrBlaygor
3 days ago
“We need our own team.”
58

@SteveOfWessex
1 day ago
General George S Patton “We fought the wrong enemy.”
13

@NinthNazgul
3 days ago
It’s true. We were never asked.
113

@andreaboundey7850
3 days ago
The woke folk would be having a breakdown right now
68

1 reply

@darriusjeddburgh6316
2 days ago
and that is not just a good thing, it’s something that should be done 24/7/365
1

@Leigh666XF
3 days ago
Not sure Sammy was ready for that
Legend for having the chat and putting it out for people to make up their own mind
52

@justinchappe
3 days ago
An interview for the Australian history books.
143

@janoycresva2018
3 days ago
Damn these guys make a lot of sense
63

1 reply

@Thunderstriker88
9 hours ago
Watch Europa the Last Battle if you’d like to learn more

@iSpike
3 days ago (edited)
text-green-game-overVOTE 1 BLAIR COTTRELL for Prime Minister of AUSTRALIA elbowcough
59

@Greg-yq5sc
3 days ago (edited)
Sam…as a decades long Geelong supporter I reckon you have career peaked (i.e social media) with this incredible raw and TRUE interview with genuine Aussie ‘outlaws’. Its like the first mainstream journo to interview Ned Kelly. Credit to you for having the guts, brains…and timing… to do this. I don’t agree with the Oz neo-Nazis on everything…but I think Australia should be MAJORITY White as the founders intended. And that DOESN’T exclude other races contributing as a MINORITY.
99

1 reply

@Xylos101
3 days ago
there were some great eps of street talk.
2

@redpillbot92
3 days ago
Great interview. Hail victory
58

@harpersneil
3 days ago
Outstanding stuff – kudos to Sam for being one of the few bastions of uncensored media.
TS and Blair are bloody legends.
50

@Mk-np2bu
1 day ago
Thomas Sewell is amazing for exposing the truth!
11

@andreaboundey7850
3 days ago
Great information. Australia is definitely worse during these times due to the migration into Australia. They are not patriotic to Australia, they are not contributing positivity to Australian culture. I don’t like what is happening right now. I dislike going into public spaces and the majority of people speak another language. Its terrible! These guys are spot on!! Good on you and thank you for speaking up!
44

@gary1705
3 days ago
Thanks so much Sam for having the courage to do this interview
36

@HamletsGoon
3 days ago
This is easily the best content to come out of Australian politics in many, many years.
Second part when?
80

1 reply

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
lol not in a billion years

@soldierundercommand8307
3 days ago
Awesome Interview Sammy
59

@NORMIESAXON
3 days ago
Tom and Blair speak the truth.
39

@Lord_Humungus
3 days ago
I garantee this old guy would never berate any other racial advocate other than white. if a nigerian said they wanted nigeria to stay nigerian, nobody would bat an eyelid, but this guy has the big balls to join in attacking the guys who already have all mainstream media attacking them for expressing the same reasonable belief. of coarse its completely normal to not want to be ethnically replaced, saying it isnt is embarrasingly clownish, emperors new clothes shit
42

4 replies

@danielarcher1459
3 days ago
This can’t be said enough
6

@Juiceb0xable
2 days ago
This
1

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
How cowardly is it though?

@brent5310
1 day ago
Spot on.

@billyharrison2381
3 days ago
Freedom of speech should never be revoked, Blood and honour
41

@exquofonte
3 days ago
They have not chosen the easy path. You have to respect that
40

@user-ip3rz2pn7w
2 days ago
These guys actually make a lot of sense.
17

@SheffieldBornAndBred
3 days ago
Should have been interviewed separately but a great interview regardless, hats off to the guests for having the intelligence to see and understand the threat all white western nations are facing, the tide is turning.
47

1 reply

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago (edited)
Absolutely. I would have loved to have seen an interview with just Blair and the host.
4

@bruciekibbutz2947
2 days ago
Having watched the whole thing now, it’s clear Sam isn’t quite all there anymore. It’s a shame he chose to attack Blair and call him a scumbag the following day, but he’s struggling to even have a conversation, it’s no wonder he buckled to pressure after this interview.
18

1 reply

@Blayne1973
19 hours ago
+1 for having them on
-1 was pussing out the next day

@damachinen
3 days ago
Sam, are you going to have these 2 blokes back? I’d like to hear more from Tom and Blair on other issues that Australians face. Thanks for the interview.
55

1 reply

@bobbybob-w4p
2 days ago
lmao never

@belteshazzarinbabylon6047
3 days ago
Thomas Sewell and Blair are great men! Keep Australia Australian!
36

@Blayne1973
19 hours ago
Well done to Sam Newman for conducting this interview. Too bad he pussied out the following day after Dvir and his media/political lackies started freaking out. If Sam thought Blair and Tom were so repulsive, why didn’t he say it to their faces during the interview? Pretty weak if you ask me.
8

@mollypillow8118
2 days ago
“I’ve been to Dachau so all the stories are true.”
Good show by the two, allegedly hateful guests who were composed, polite, and speaking obvious truths.
19

@RagnarLothbrok2222
1 day ago
Australia is for Australians – that’s IT. Based dudes standing up for their people
8

@SenatorSlayer
3 days ago
Sam Newman thank you for defending Free Speech
56

1 reply

@charltoncorbett2973
3 days ago
He didn’t. Sam- “Hurtful words create violence in competing foreign demographics, therefore the only solution is to create hate speech laws”
3

@nope8183
9 hours ago
These men seem pretty level headed glad to see White men have unity for THEIR homeland.
4

@Leanflare
3 days ago
Hail Tom
64

@ozzicossy5552
3 days ago
We have the right to have our own nation for our people.
A nation is about more than just “ideals and values”.
The millions of indians can go back to india and have those ideals.
41

@beryldwyer9763
2 days ago
When in India i was told “I want to live in your Country because your Government pay people to stay home and not work”. These guys are running rings around this interview..their knowledge is amazing..
15

@newway61
2 days ago
Great interview thanks Sam. TOM AND blair are well spoken, articulate and they conducted themselves in a professional manner which resonates with many many Aussies who are currently watching Australia burn through the mismanagement of corrupt politicians and external unelected organisations. I encourage those with an interest in our true history and the real facts of what happened in WWII to find Europa the Last Battle
20

@FrankTigani
3 days ago
Sam is a boomer but still credit to him for at least having these guys on
36

@JHS-2
2 days ago
Brilliant! This is an educational interview. Well done guys! Love and greetings from an Scandinavien Anglo-Saxon.
19

@proxywar99
2 days ago
Every time I hear Thomas or Blair speak I’m always impressed with their ability to articulate themselves and their confidence with which they explain their taboo worldview. It takes guts and brains to do what these guys are doing. The cowards who denounce them will be forgotten quickly but these brave young men will make the history books and be talked about for decades to come!
16

@Truth_seeker1984
3 days ago
Sam is going to cop it in the MSM for this can’t believe he actually posted it
39

2 replies

@neilr4867
3 days ago
He has nothing to lose these days. Love to see it.
9

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
@neilr4867 he was fired 5yrs ago for calling George floyd a pos on air

@heritagefirst
2 days ago
Boomer is mystified that the youth in his country are disgusted by what his generation threw away. Then has the audacity to act like he’s virtuous over them. The disconnect between the young and the old has never been more stark
13

1 reply

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
Boomers my Rss!!!
It was a boomer that brought this to my attention over 20 years ago…
(Grow up)

@brendezen
3 days ago
As someone who makes videos on Australian pride myself, thank you Sam for allowing our two brothers onto your platform to express themselves freely. That’s the way it should be.
43

@southern-samurai
3 days ago
They make very good points.
39

@AmericaFirstKorey
1 day ago
Two very well spoken gentleman. Why is it that they call them evil, but never wrong? Is it only wrong because they are exposing the truth against those who wish White Australians harm?
7

@MattiDwyer
3 days ago
These guys make too much sense to give a fair hearing. Thanks for having them on.
21

@CurtTaylor-n8z
2 days ago
Those Aussie lads are not wrong. They are heroes of their nation and people.
18

@redoz9768
3 days ago
White Australia policy years also had tariffs to protect local manufacturing and jobs. When they dropped the tariffs we lost all of our manufacturing industries.
30

3 replies

@robertaustin6940
3 days ago
Bring back the WAP!
2

@charltoncorbett2973
3 days ago
The LIMA declaration detroyed that
3

@Jim-yk9zw
2 days ago
And think of all our gas, iron ore and whatnot going overseas for a pittance while we pay a premium. Some Scandinavian nations actually have a sovereign wealth fund where the resources sold result in dividends for the citizens. Not good old Australia though.
3

@darhman5299
3 days ago
Great job. Sometimes, difficult conversations are necessary. I respect, admire, and even fear free expression. While I don’t always agree with it, I accept it.
31

@annyirish6106
3 days ago
It’s so frustrating to watch the host trying miserably to argue for the mental chains he’s been put in.
36

7 replies

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
Even more frustrating to have all your comments deleted when you haven’t even broken the so-called TOS.
8

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
As I tried posting numerous times here now,…
How do you keep a populace diseased?
3

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
By marking the bottle of medicine which will cure them..
2

@1neAdam12
3 days ago

1

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
I had to break my comment up into multiple posts, just to have it stick.
THAT’S where we’re at!
5

@PM-im8nq
3 days ago
He’s a boomer, give him a break
4

@annyirish6106
3 days ago
@PM-im8nq I give him kudos for having these fine young Australian Aryan men on but it’s frustrating to watch the cognitive dissonance all the same.
5

@tagekoolander
2 days ago
Europeans deserve to preserve their homelands
28

@gitboy314
3 days ago
Would love to see more of Tom and Blair on podcasts with a coherent interviewer.
55

@anonymous-3695
3 days ago
Defend free speech at all costs.
37

@Dei-gratia9498
3 days ago
So their main point is that Australia should be a white/European homeland. Same views
as the founders, which made Australia, usa, canda the top countries everyone wants to move to. Very good interview, you should have with them more times, greetings from Sweden
37

@brettweir9050
1 day ago
Australian’s, I hope you regain your land and I hope your elders wake the F UP. I hope all White nations wake the F UP. We as white people are the only race who move humanity forward in knowledge, technology, and exploration.
8

@pictlander
3 days ago
Great interview.
51

@steveos6472
3 days ago
Best podcast yet!
30

@collider5362
3 days ago
I agree with everything they said
34

@hevsa1507
3 days ago
Good on you for sticking to your principles Sam.
The legacy media might come down on you like a ton of bricks, but that’s only because they’re afraid of losing control. Tom and Blair are stand up guys and this show proves it.
26

@andystuart4667
3 days ago
White Aussies just want a place to call home. And some representation would be great
Great interview these two lads, made some excellent points
16

@thomasbrittinghamjr.8508
3 days ago
Thanks for having these guys on. It’s a shame what the establishment media, government and police have done to these men that love their people and country. Lots of good, common sense from them.
22

@minecraftislit
3 days ago
Fuck yeah
30

@fionagolsdworthy
3 days ago
Sam was being a complete arsehole if you ask me.
I take my hat off to Blair and Thomas for staying calm and collected.
You both love your country and only want what’s best for it. As do I.
47

3 replies

@spoilsvictor993
2 days ago
if sam wasnt being an asshole he wouldnt be doing his job. sam just played devils advocate and quite well. you can tell hes impressed.
2

@innes2819
2 days ago
​ @spoilsvictor993 I’m not so sure, I think he wanted a spike in viewers and these two were his ticket.

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
​ @spoilsvictor993 I get the impression he wanted to catch them out & discredit them.
But failed.
(Let’s hope he learned something.)

@kooszondernaam
3 days ago
Great interview. Australia for the White man!
32

@derwoodhamburger
2 days ago
I’m not much into the white nationalism, maybe I’m a little uninformed. But I do believe the 6 million number has been widely inflated. I also think these 2 men are good blokes despite what any mainstream media may say about them
27

@Keribou109
3 days ago
Massive respect to Sam for this. Blair and Thomas are legends. Let’s see others follow suit and platform these gentlemen and many others like them.
23

@NathanOrlick
3 days ago
Well done Sam, these guys aren’t the raging psychos the media makes them out to be
19

@pureblood3765
3 days ago
Hail Victory! Hail Free Speech!
33

@northender2928
11 hours ago
Great interview, These guys seem really intelligent and well spoken, Absolute Chads. I reckon most every average White Australian, Canadian, American and so on feel and connect with what they are saying on some level.
4

@Ek-re8ts
3 days ago
Sewell and Blair are honorable man and the interviewer just made himself look like antagonistic vermin.
55

4 replies

@dirtymcgreg
3 days ago
sam newman is peak boomer he’s definitely out of his depth here but didn’t do too bad
21

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
70+ years of programming will do it.
12

@locmajor6159
1 day ago
​ @dirtymcgreg never seen him before because I’m American, I knew I could’ve been reading him wrong with nothing prior to go off of but I thought the same lol
1

@Blayne1973
19 hours ago
Interviewers are allowed to be antagonistic. Otherwise what’s the point? Without asking legitimate questions it’s just propaganda.

@translatoractivist
3 days ago
You are a brave man. It takes balls to seek for Truth. God bless you
21

@slonkymalonki2933
3 days ago
Love it!!!!
40

3 days ago
Freedom of speech will never die
27

@peterfreeman927
1 day ago (edited)
This interview was the best discussion I have seen in years, well done to all involved. I live in Melbourne and it is not the place I grow up in, I will be moving to the country were it is mostly white.
8

@Wyatt-ub6hn
3 days ago
Support to Australia from America. Our nations will be free once again.
15

@forbesy3082
3 days ago
Great interview, well done Sam for doing it, one of the only people to hold an honest interview these days. And how can you not agree with Tom and Blair? All White men should be joining their team and fighting for the future of Australia.
28

@earlturner6023
3 days ago
Sam you’re a legend mate
36

@benlecornu356
3 days ago
good on you sam for havin them on!!
42

@peekaytruth6649
2 days ago
Finally you have interviewed some intelligent people who have balls
10

@CircumambulationMaedia
2 days ago
These guys are legitimately the only people in the political space that care about Australians
9

@Edfgt
3 days ago
Hail Victory Blood and Honour
25

@Sonnenwolf777
3 days ago
Nice to see these guys actually not getting censored for once haha
19

@zachary_duggan
3 days ago
Yes Australians are waking up! To find out rules you, look at who you cannot criticise! Unfortunately our government, military, media & banking system are all controlled by the same people who were kicked out of 109 countries for the same thing.
17

@JarlBubbleLord
3 days ago
They’re spot on!
21

@GorilazPlay
3 days ago
Great episode, victory is inevitable! Greetings from Sweden
28

@LogosVeritas-di1yp
3 days ago
more interviews like this…. Australia!
38

@Helen6565e6b
3 days ago
It is now 2:30 am Tuesday morning
I listened to the podcast from start to finish. I found the topic quite volatile, passionate, and scary at times, but I persevered and listened without my own feelings, getting in the way
Basically, I heard what most Australians are thinking in private, but don’t dare say out loud. To a certain extent, of course .
The only thing I can say is that this government and governments that have come and gone have ruined Australia and will continue to do so.which gives rise to these groups of people because they feel unheard and despondent and have deep feelings of uselessness and hatred.
Thank you Sam for having the courage to bring this topic to your listeners.
22

10 replies

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
Why add “hatred” though…
Where was the H8???

@Helen6565e6b
1 day ago
​@gepettosplaylists These men are full of vitriol, but then, if our government closed our borders and stopped bringing people in, things wouldn’t escalate as they have now.
We are a country with an abundance of natural resources, but we make nothing that in itself is soul destroying and makes for a poisonous society
We need to start making things again to be proud of ourselves and our country.
1

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
@Helen6565e6b Yeah I agree with pretty much all you said… But I wonder why you are using the word “hatred.”
“H8” is a loaded word, a word that carries connotations, and has been weaponised via law.
I didn’t see any “H8” in their interview…

@Helen6565e6b
1 day ago
If you find the word hatred offensive ( as obviously you have ) The action of the word is far more dangerous. Search deeper into what they’re actually saying .I’m sure you are intelligent enough to understand their intentions.

@gepettosplaylists
19 hours ago
@Helen6565e6b they are simply annoyed at what has happened to their country…
That doesn’t by default equal hate…
You should be intelligent enough to comprehend that surely.

@Helen6565e6b
19 hours ago

@gepettosplaylists Don’t you mean OUR COUNTRY!!!!!
And excuse me, but now you’re being snidely with your remark.
See how things can turn, and we are just two people .
Something to think about.

@gepettosplaylists
18 hours ago
​ @Helen6565e6b It’s called being snide, not snidely…
And it was similar to the way you ended your comment to me…
Don’t give it, if you can’t take it.

@Helen6565e6b
18 hours ago
That was a typo, and believe me, I can take anything you can dish out.

@gepettosplaylists
18 hours ago

@Helen6565e6b your grumpy face says NOT.
1

@Helen6565e6b
18 hours ago
​ @gepettosplaylists Is that better

@followerofthetrain6336
2 days ago
The host is a little obnoxious and clearly way behind on the way the world works but thank you none the less for giving these men a much needed platform. They are heroes.
26

1 reply

@PadFoot-k9h
2 days ago (edited)
a Little obnoxious? It’s more like full out hostile and pathetic.
4

@jonfoxtrot5135
3 days ago
There is nothing wrong with being a nationalist and advocating for a path to hegenomy in one’s country. Multiculturalism, as well as numerous social policies have never been mandated and the major parties are the architects of those unapproved policies.
20

@HEdied-FORus
1 day ago
My Irish born mother came here in 1956 on a boat, what layed before her were opportunities to build a wonderful life and she has.. she’s 93 now and still lives independently in her own home. She made some good investments and enjoys a ‘part’ pension and never went without. My son and I can’t afford to live and will never have the experience of buying our own home. She fully agrees that there are absolutely too many ‘culturally different’ people here who can’t speak the language. Where has Dick Smith gone too BTW?
7

@Timic83tc
2 days ago
Our country’s been run by clowns for 50+ years now
9

@jasonwalker2950
2 days ago
Sam Newman needs to do a part two with these guys again. This is a record breaking video.
14

1 reply

@evgeny7039
2 days ago
He will never ever touch this subject with a 10 foot pole again. And will come up with an apology in a couple of days for hosting these guys. I am sure he already got the call and is trying to figure a way out for him.
3

@gm5301
3 days ago
Great to see Tom madke it to a podcast outside of our circle. It’s imperative that we reach out to different social spheres of the European people. I pray Tom and the NSN a fruitful and great 2025, Blair as well!
15

@meh.7640
10 hours ago
i love this comment section. we’ll get our countries back one day
7

1 reply

@1neAdam12
1 hour ago
Took Spain centuries, but they did.

@plopppytheman
3 days ago
Great conversation, thanks!
30

@jessiejordan2853
1 day ago
Awesome interview!
These guys are great!
8

@taylorburke5388
3 days ago
The man said monkey while trying to remember George Floyd’s name. Nice
24

3 replies

@neilr4867
3 days ago

5

@rodneytuxedo7559
2 days ago
Caught that too.
2

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago

1

@locmajor6159
1 day ago (edited)
Ended it with “We Love Our Country!” God bless yall man, from southern united states, “the bible belt” baby!
6

@angelahinagates2971
3 days ago
These lads are not driven by hate but by love and they affirm life and wish to protect their own communities, families.
13

@stephenlewis7756
2 days ago
Keep it up guys and thank you!
16

@GondorHorn
3 days ago
Thank you Sam for being transparent and honest.
18

@hadrian73
3 days ago
Excellent interview.
34

@8Matias88
3 days ago
Don’t let Australia became England,Germany, Sweden, France etc.
27

2 replies

@Maza675
2 days ago
It’s well on the way
5

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
The whole of the west is in the same boat.
2

@JamesSmith-w9v2c
2 days ago
These blokes are bang on the money. Sam agrees but is merely saving face.
16

@wazzman7548
3 days ago
Quick delete this before we realize we all agree with Thomas sewell and he’s actually quite rational.
22

1 reply

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
tick tock
i give it a week

@Aria-gg1oo
1 day ago
Love seeing Blair & Tim! Respect from Canada.
7

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
On Australia day, Adelaide police arrested 16 members of the NsN network for peacefully demonstrating on Australia Day. They didn’t even have their faces covered. They were charged with loitering, and police refused to let them out on bail until they signed conditions saying they would not associate with each other. Never mind that police routinely let foreign criminals out on bail after assault charges; never mind that within the last few months several men charged with child sex offences were let out on bail; and never mind that it goes against the literal law to put restriction of association on bail conditions unless violent crime is involved.
One member has refused to sign the conditions and as a result has been in jail for over a week, without food or basic necessities; this article also fails to mention the man is in his 60s.
The NSN TERRIFIES our ruling class and they are willing to become worse tyrants than they were during covid to silence them.
Its a travesty Sam barely touched on this
16

2 replies

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
I didn’t link the article to avoid YouTube removing my comment as spam.
1

@Keribou109
2 days ago
Blair brought it up about 4 times and Sam ignored him
2

@will2665
3 days ago
Brilliant
26

@douglasfishburne5194
3 days ago
Weird how having people on with views
that are heavily censored and dont get main stream support makes you nervous. Ideas are to be shared, whether you agree or not
16

@myart1336
2 days ago
The documentary ‘Europa: the Last Battle’ has some interesting information on the subject.
15

1 reply

@thepaedophileprofit3062
1 day ago
Ive heard some people describe it as a “must see” documentary, the critics rave about it, that’s what I have been told.
1

@ALS_AustNZ
2 days ago (edited)
These two guys quietly blew Sam’s Boomer mind. Apparently since this interview he’s been trying to walk back & is bagging Blair out. Blair, Tom, Jacob & others have had their X accounts simultaneously suspended obviously at the behest of the gov.
This will only attract more attention & interest in these guys.
Both of these guys have very polished talking points & are very cogent. They know their stuff.
Indians here on fake premise & slowly importing their Dalits is a huge problem.
10

@WaffenSSTotenkopf
2 days ago
NSN – Our guys Down Under!
Strength and Honor, from Norway
7

@user-bc4yt4rm9l
2 days ago
Australia for Europeans
16

@danielarcher1459
3 days ago
Thanks for airing this. There’s a deep truth in what these guys say, but the media just wants to see one side.
10

1 reply

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
And who exactly owns the media?
4

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
Everyone needs to download and reupload this before its taken down.
Which it will be, mark my words
20

2 replies

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
Yeah, there was a similar Swedish interview and it got taken down
6

@struthmedia8315
2 days ago
If Sam caves to pressure and takes it down, I’m all ready to mirror it on my channel. For educational purposes.
6

@jarrid1220
2 days ago
These two gentlemen seem pretty reasonable to me.
11

@DarthAdolf0
2 days ago
Boomer subconsciously knows he’s wrong… Bro is fuming
12

@matthammond1737
4 hours ago
You can see this boomer struggling with a lifetime of programming…
6

@JennyLynn36
3 days ago
Thank you for having these guys on. Great interview.
17

@Shallowchal
3 days ago
Ahhh free speech. It’s worth its weight in gold.
22

@EdwardsComment
2 days ago
This was a pretty interesting conversation, I appreciated it. It was a wild start, straight to the core of the programming – If Nationalism, then Hitler. If Hitler -> Hol*caust! The story used to scatter any organization or dissent against the occupying regimes that despise their own people and hurry to replace them.
7

@taylorburke5388
3 days ago
Well this was a fun watch. So many great points disregarded. Blair is a serious voice of reason. Thomas stands firms on his beliefs and doesn’t let bs disrupt him. Lastly the interviewer didn’t edit the video and made.good on his word
10

@NameThem8888
2 days ago
White countries for the White man.
9

@gmindset224
2 days ago
Sam’s a good sport for having the boys on his show. Big respect, lots of balls.
9

@AntiquityIsResurgent
3 days ago
Thomas Sewell, Handsome Truth, Blair Cottrell, Jacob Hersant, Thomas Russo.
I will fight for these men; I’m just waiting for my leaders to call time.
12

1 reply

@Jim-yk9zw
2 days ago
Stop waiting, they have made the call. Get involved now.
2

@alanfaulkner6329
2 days ago
Tom and Blair have just been booted off X. Funny old thing.
10

@Greezy_Monkey
3 days ago
Well done, Tom & Blair. We absolutely need to create a home for Whites in this world. I can not understand how you both hold your composure with the constant derailing of your statements by the, clearly biased interviewers. Good on you for spreading, proper information and a different perspective.
15

@mynameisnobody211
3 days ago
I’m very interested in and support what these fellows said and I’m sure there are many likeminded people in Australia that would agree.
13

@NateHignogs
2 days ago
I agree with Tom and Blair.
10

@88spammer
2 days ago
These comments give me hope for the future of Australia.
12

@jd2966
3 days ago
legendary!
39

@justincredible3501
3 days ago
They make a lot of sense. Hearing them Express their views
and plans makes me look at our society completely differently. We really are under attack. And we really are the only ones who can’t have a homeland of Our Own
8

@Warntator
3 days ago
there is absolutely nothing wrong with racism. be racist or be replaced
16

1 reply

@robertaustin6940
3 days ago
Friggen A.

@CrunchyMom88
2 days ago
Blair. Thank you, sir. Thank you so much for talking about race and how it’s MUCH MUCH more than skin color.
13

@paulpettitt4679
3 days ago
Sam is doing a fair job however he clearly does not a have a good knowledge of history.
20

@jimunit333
3 days ago
Shut up! Let the lads speak Sam wow! Good on you for having them on , would of loved to hear more from them. This will be your most watched video in only a few days.
11

@Knightt322
12 hours ago
White Australia sounds good to me
6

@natty4316
3 days ago
Well done for doing this buddy!
21

@hh75966
3 days ago
Well done Sammy, for providing a much needed broader platform to hear the voices of Blair and Tom.
Whilst media talking-heads and compromised Political Members wish to destroy our Great Nation, these Men wish to save and restore it.
Australian History in the making
9

@rabbiyitzchaksviben-tzionl3203
3 days ago
Well done sam good interview
23

@WorzelGummage79
2 days ago
Sam came across as a conceited, sarcastic smartarse but at least he had the balls to have these blokes on and to interview them and publish it unedited.
10

@marlboroman9393
2 days ago
These fellas are so right
10

@MagicManintheSky
3 days ago
Sam: “Racism is about ah um er um ah ee um uh……..muh racism!”
17

3 replies

@ScottRTGM
3 days ago
Sam is a good sport, and he was good at sport too.
I am glad he had these gentlemen on his show to tell their story.
I won’t say he was totally unbiased, but he certainly let them have their say and we can all make up our minds accordingly
13

@stooged579
1 day ago
These lads a spot on, interviewer is a bit of a donkey but at least he put these lads on to get their voice out, we need a part 2
7

@24hmelbournelocksmithdotco6
3 days ago
Hail victory. Hail the NSN
20

@MyDarren13
3 days ago
Never heard your podcast before, and have no interest in listening to you Sam again.
Key note, let your guests speak.
You Sam, like millions of other brain washed sheep have any idea of what is coming. Great work Thomas and Blair
18

2 replies

@justinchappe
3 days ago
It’s Sam’s style of podcast. He let the guests speak. What’s up your arse?

@eahos3768
3 days ago
@justinchappe He was alright. But he kept mumbling and interrupting them.
Sometimes it seems like there is not one argument online where people let eachother speak.

@aydoss4566
2 days ago
Blair and Thomas are great men, the last bastion of true blue Aussies
9

@lsd1649
2 days ago
While i really dont like their views
on Nazism, hitler, the holocaust, or race in general, i would say (as a trumpian liberal) they do have some interesting points.
I have been wondering for a while:
– Why do all other people get to have a homeland (where they are the majority) while all Western people are being made into minorities in their homeland?
– Why is talking about (and practising) multiculturalism considered normal, but if you do it for monoculturalism, then you are extreme?
– why are all ethnic groups allowed to openly advocate for their own groups success, but white people (who won ww2 and saved the world) are called supremist if they do the same?
I recently read a book called ‘the unknown warriors’by Nicholas Pringle. It documents how ww2 veterans felt about how britain turned out, and it was a very depressing read.
10

3 replies

@lsd1649
2 days ago
I’ve also been wondering about the immigration narrative.
We are told that we need more immigration in Western countries because of low birthrates, which means we are being forced into a breeding competition for the right to our homeland (which we lose as migrant have higher birth rates). However, all Western nations have laws against introducing non indiginous species because they may outcompete (out breed) indiginous species?
I know we’re not animals, but it seems odly hypocritical that a cow has more rights not to be replaced in the West than the indiginous western people….
5

@Adam-jr4lx
2 days ago
@lsd1649 folks have cognitive dissonance. invasive species are bad but multiracial is good because that’s fighting against racism.
2

@lsd1649
2 days ago

@Adam-jr4lx well that is the common argument, about it being anti-racist etc, but more and more I find myself struggling to accept this argument.
For example, why is it considered anti-racist to let infinite amounts of people into your country, but racist to want all people to have their own homeland?
In the first situation, while it may appear accepting, all that is happening is that one group (westerners) are losing land and their culture to foreign groups who still have all of their homeland. However, in the second instance, all groups keep their homeland and can work together (through trade and sharing) to improve each other’s homeland without disspossession.
Surely the second is less racist and more equal?
Then again, I’m probably overthinking things . I’m sure someone will be able to see the flaw in my logic.
3

@brendezen
3 days ago
Warm up the planes. Hundred percent agree.
12

@drivingintothedesertuntilt3202
3 days ago
This sort of debate should be on q and a
16

@mickyss7766
2 days ago
Us wogs support these guys
18

5 replies

@HP66856
2 days ago
Legend
5

@griffin1366
2 days ago
Except when you’re deported .. ?
1

@mickyss7766
2 days ago

@griffin1366 European my friend.

@griffin1366
2 days ago
@mickyss7766 Well you aren’t informed then. You will be going as well if these guys ever get their wishes.

@mickyss7766
2 days ago

@griffin1366 they clearly note in the video with sam, European only.

@KHANAGE1311
3 days ago (edited)
The fact that Sam had the guts to give them a voice, I’m subscribing.

And, these two men speak for a LOT MORE AUSTRALIANS than most people realise.
Bravo to Thomas and Blair.
3

@elijahbrown1734
3 days ago
BASED SAM NEWMAN!!
24

@theycallme_nightmaster
2 days ago (edited)
o/ support from USA. Still waiting for the day people learn the difference between the words “Nationalism” and “Supremacy”
7

@evgeny7039
3 days ago
No wonder these two will never have a fair go at channel 9. They make too much sense.
13

@Tachibana-p9e
3 days ago
Host ruined it by interrupting constantly.
15

@theoffender3113
3 days ago (edited)
If you’ve dug a little deeper into the history of the Australian continent you’d find that the Australian Aboriginal weren’t the first people here.. there was a smaller race of people here that stood about one metre tall.. they came down from South East Asia/Timor and predominantly live in North Queensland.. it is believed they were wiped out by around 30 to 40 thousand years ago by what now is known as the Australian Aboriginals we now know .. and some pigmies were still around only up till 3000 years ago.. the very last ones lived in the Cardwell region up till the late 1800’s
17

4 replies

@hollargirl-w1e
3 days ago
It is men such as these who will be remembered as heros. They are great leaders.
8

@shankspony9369
3 days ago
In 1900 European peoples were 30% of the worlds population. Today we are just 7% and falling.
10

1 reply

@Keribou109
3 days ago
We need to make people aware of this
7

@DaisyDate
2 days ago
Love this. I hope the NSN grows more and more. Keeping speaking the truth .
7

@HoisinCrispyOwl
2 days ago
Good job mate.
The truth is, these lads are the only guys fighting for the Australia our ancestors founded and died for.
11

@noglobo
3 days ago
Cheers Sam, it takes guts to platform these two. Thank you for allowing them to speak at length.
6

@marklambert8881
3 days ago
TRUTH matter’s more than me, and U.
21

@Goy-wc8od
3 days ago
Hail Tom and the NSN. Let us all aspire to be as great as these men and by the gods we’ll have our homes again. Hail victory
6

@conlitras3379
3 days ago
“I want a noble Australia” you know what, me too!
10

@jolheb9091
23 hours ago
Many countries are actually on the way to this sort of thinking already, its not hard to look it up and see why they are doing it. Myself I agree to an extent
5

@stoveone4031
3 days ago
Brave of you to do this, good stuff. These lads are solid
14

@GD-ev7lb
2 days ago
Good stuff. Australia can’t be for everyone, if Israel can be for Jews, surely Australia can be for European people who settled here.
We have our flag and it represents our nation. Not the nation of everyone.
8

@jordane19969
1 day ago
Ben shapiro people are not going to like this one. Shut it down
12

@cjaksson
3 days ago
Team Australia or GTFO!
14

@michellejohnson7683
2 days ago
two level headed blokes saying things we are conditioned to turn away from, and if you have that feeling like i do, where did it come from? Are we being brainwashed to dislike ourselves?
9

@SerenityNow22
2 days ago
Praying for these bold men from Canada . We are in the same boat over here
4

@cricketer121
3 days ago
An honourable interview
12

@peterpepper2983
2 days ago
T sewell articulation maxxing. Respect the airplanes, respect the remigration! Love your own folk. Real Nationalism forever.
6

@Mr.X__777
3 days ago
Love you Sammy!
25

@eddieramone7619
3 days ago
Much respect to the two guests. Great guys, very reasonable.
8

@kanefleming
3 days ago
Hail Victory. Australia For The White Man
15

@Peter-i1y
1 day ago
One question you have to ask are these guys speaking truth? And if they are why aren’t they allowed to speak!
6

@CKyIe
3 days ago
Hail Sam Newman!
o/
Absolute legend, allowing these guys to speak.
11

@securitron5
22 hours ago
To the largely irrelevant, condescending boomer host guy:
Let your guests finish their thoughts and stop interrupting them. It’s embarrassing to witness. The lads did excellent despite that.
6

@madforit2
3 days ago
I have to say these 2 guys sound very reasonable and agree with their points. Seems a wild overreaction to demonise them so much
13

@Bill87762
2 days ago
Thomas is the most succinct messenger we have now- he’s not American but our struggle emanates from a worldwide attack on our people.
6

1 reply

@jza9962
3 days ago
You can’t teach a Boomer new tricks. Still, I give this video a right arm up o/
14

@DarkStar27183
1 day ago (edited)
2025 is the start of the golden age. Trump, and more importantly these blokes, are just the beginning
5

@lonnybonani9603
3 days ago
Hail Sewell and Cotrell, real men
12

@alsturrock8940
1 day ago
‘We love our country’. That’s a problem for some it would seem. Well played for having them on. Free speech lives but only just.
6

@rustyshakleford5776
3 days ago
Interviewer is so patronizing. Never heard of these guys before but they seem very reasonable, thoughtful and well spoken.
11

@DeepPurple-gr6wj
2 days ago
Kudos to you for having the balls to host these fellas.
They are right about everything they said.
5

@HehdhsBsnajs
3 days ago
Blair for Senate 2030
10

@ender8170
11 hours ago
Fantastic video. Wish the interviewer wasn’t so rude and interjected constantly. Otherwise thank you for putting them on the air.
4

@GlobalistJuice
2 days ago
I don’t know… I think Tom and Blair may have a new recruit today.haha ha! But seriously, I give the interviewer credit for speaking with these men on this day, and I can see he’s genuinely interested in the reasons behind their cause, albeit he says he’s not sympathetic to that cause – and even though I’ve never laid eyes (or ears) on Mr. Sam Newman before, he’s not a stupid man, he sees the writing on the wall. Unfortunately as with many of his generation, there’s a collective knee-jerk outrage reaction to anyone countering the fantastical history of WWII of 80yrs ago, and it’s engrained in his generation throughout all their lives (I know, as I’m also a “Boomer”, although a few years younger at age 68), and the majority of that generation cannot ever come to terms with the reality of that war, for fear of retaliation and moreso, most are of the camp that it’s just too late in their years of life to be bothered to investigate the story. Great interview, Tom and Blair are fine men who love their country, thank you for sharing it.
10

@Mothy2014
3 days ago
I can’t believe this is still on YT 15 hours later.
Conversations like this need to be heard.
Freedom of speech!!!
7

1 reply

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
give it time bro

@thomassinclair731
3 days ago
American here! This is a great interview. These men look and sound absolutely normal — or what ought to be normal, and will be normal! Are they scheduled to appear on Tucker Carlson?
11

1 reply

@Ruby-ss6mu
2 days ago
That would be a fantastic idea!
1

@ballpython324
21 hours ago
Amazing interview thank you for this
4

@theREELdogman
3 days ago
2 men talk to a walking vaccine injury
17

1 reply

@Hank-ii7pn
3 days ago
savage
1

@mcmelissa6062
3 days ago
Great interview Sam. I hope you endeavour to revise some of our history books and begin to understand that we have been lied to and indoctrinated into believing the solitary narrative written by the victors. At the end of the day, I think most Australians can agree that multiculturalism is a failed experiment that no one asked for.
8

@organismseven3700
2 days ago
Sam Newman is an old-school Conservative with a small “c”.
He has had this mindset his entire life.
Being exposed to National Socialism ideology is almost impossible for him to process.
You can see the cogs in his mind going haywire during the entire conversation.
At various points you can see actual brain freezes occur.
A reset button seems to be pressed and he starts to try and process what he is hearing.
Tries, and fails over and over again.
Most of his generation are incapable of changing how they think.
It is sad, because most of them do have good hearts and they have kind natures.
But having “good hearts and kind natures” has brought us to this point.
The younger generation need to have hard hearts and strong resolve.
Otherwise, we are finished!
11

@coreyworthingtonii9230
2 days ago
40:03
That’s a very good point – we don’t need people bringing their foreign wars to our shores.
6

@natty4316
3 days ago
Well done for doing this, you should maybe question yourself as to why it’s more upsetting to you to discuss the historical accuracy of an event that happened 80year ago when you’re actually in the middle of being replaced by the 3rd world
13

@thedaily30
11 hours ago
Sam, you’re an embarrassment to our ancestors. Shame on you for trying to throw Blair under the bus after this interview. Repulsive behavior.
5

@slickrick1913
1 day ago
Props to Sam for airing this, especially unedited, even if he was an insufferable boomer for the whole thing. He really doesn’t have the intellectual and historical foundation for this discussion. Thankfully there are still strong and sane men in the world like Tom and Blair.
10

2 replies

@Timic83tc
2 days ago
It is vital we never become south Africa.
8

@jadeharvey1265
3 days ago
Great and honest interview!
14

@Tachibana-p9e
3 days ago
These guys sound completely reasonable to me.
8

@struthmedia8315
2 days ago
As of 9.30pm EST Feb 4, both Blair and Tom have been suspended from X
Blair’s account was still up this morning, gone by the arvo.
Tom’s only vanished within the last hour
It seems my other comment about this is being auto deleted
10

2 replies

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
This should tell you everything you need to know about what our “rulers” are able to accomplish when they sense a threat
This is not a coincidence
9

@shoahkahn2692
2 days ago
Have you seen the photo-op recently (as in, today) posted there of Mileikowsky / “Netanyahu” (left), Trump (centre), and Musk (right)?… For that’s all you need to know about that LARP’ing brownshirt’s, /chan/ tier trolling.
3

@toneabet6252
2 days ago
Great interview Sam, really interesting to get the perspective from people passionate about Australia.
4

@matt79hz
3 days ago
Imagine all the logic ..
Bravo
12

@Roogirl1010
3 days ago
God bless you Sam for having the courage, decency and open mindedness to open up this discussion and let the boys speak. History is written by the winners and look at what has happened to our once great nation…what a mess it is today…that tells us plenty
6

@thaNZdon
3 days ago
Bloody brilliant jobs boys – blood and honor
10

@FLmetalhead
2 days ago
Heil Thomas Sewell and Blair Cottrell!!!
8

@mocarlyle7713
3 days ago
From South Africa, Tom is 100000000% correct. Sad to see an old person who cannot observe the negative changes over time.
10

@danielarcher1459
1 day ago
I haven’t seen the like/dislike ratio but I bet it’s >95% positive. There is a huge demand for this conversation amongst the people – it is the elephant in the room that no-one’s talking about! Our so-called democracy only allows the conversation to go one way right now and that has to change.
8

1 reply

@brent5310
1 day ago
It is. There are browser add-ons that bring the dislike button back.

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago
Blair is the better spokesman.
14

2 replies

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
wait till you hear Joel Davis
1

@Student____2025__1
1 day ago

@ Joel Davis is outstanding. Big fan of his work. He’s very talented, sharp and a great communicator. Also seems like an honest and decent person.

@MitchytooSlick
2 days ago
Awesome interview these guys are the future for white aussies
8

@sixty5stoney
3 days ago
SAM NEWMAN ANGLO SAXON POWER
13

@azteacher26
9 hours ago (edited)
46:04 he called George Floyd a monkey. LMAO. Sam you’re based.
5

1 reply

@ihatserbs1771
5 hours ago
blood memories of colonizing such creatures

@MGoogle3146
3 days ago
Sam I respect your ability to hold an interview with people you clearly personally demonise, unfortunately though, that demonization prevented you from having a civil discussion which would have been more enjoyable to watch. You as an interviewer did not come across as a reasonable man wanting to hear their position.
9

1 reply

@kenouif
3 days ago
Agree. He’s usually good at interviewing but he stumbled on this one.
2

@ZachAsaD
17 hours ago
Guy in the red is a few sandwiches short of a picnic
4

@Thomas-jg2fm
3 days ago
Australia for the White man
10

@XRedDemon27
2 days ago
Respect for having these true patriots on. History shall repeat itself
3

@lidiaspazzard
3 days ago (edited)
While I appreciate Sam having them on, this conversation was totally above his level of understanding. He would have benefitted from looking into this topic a bit more before this episode. Though it does serve as an example of what it is like trying to explain these ideas to boomers and mainstream thinkers. Their minds just go straight to the points that they have been brainwashed to believe and won’t move beyond thm.
9

1 reply

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
how frustrating is it
psychologists call it anchor bias
usually the bigger the ego the harder to be more fluid in your thinking
High IQ people are susceptible to it
TLDR: Basically your IQ is being ruined by your EQ

@danas3765
1 day ago
Tom Sewell is my hero. I wish we had men like him, Davis, Blair and Hersant here in America.
4

@charltoncorbett2973
3 days ago (edited)
So by extension Sam wants the domestic population to erode their own rights, granted to them by the very foundation of their law the Magna Carta, under the predication of “civic nationalism” because two foreign communities to whom the primary demographic have absolutely no allegiance to, cannot refrain from using violence due to hurty words.
Explain to me again how competing cultural and racial demographics are a benefit to homogenous, domestic populations?
10

@leparmentiergaeru1998
2 days ago
Based gentlemen
7

@Liveleadplayer70
3 days ago
Bravo..more more
11

@acesneed3104
3 days ago
Thanks for having Tom and Blair on. We are not going down without a fight.
6

@beryldwyer9763
2 days ago
But I can’t say White Lives Matter. Not allowed ??
I am.80 and would join these guys.
10

@retter2critical
2 hours ago
Sam wont back down and be forced to do an apology tour after this … Oh wait.
2

3 replies

@Fahrenheit2030
2 days ago
Amazing show and greetings from America! You Aussies are lucky to have these men. We are losing our countries. Here in America we had illegal COMMUNISTS blocking the freeways telling us they are going to rip up our constitution. WESTERN COUNTRIES FOR EUROPEANS!!
10

@Yougottalaugh-p9u
3 days ago
Hail Tom Blair Joel and all the brave men of the NSN who are a few brave men willing to stand up for the survival of white Australia.
7

@LordOfSweden
3 days ago (edited)
Both heroes. Support to them both from Sweden. You interupt too much tho. You need to structure your interviews better.
13

@gary1705
3 days ago
It was Arthur Caldwell that was an advocate for the White Australia policy
7

@freddledgruntbuggly9408
3 days ago
GET CLIPPING LADS
12

@MashedApplePie
3 days ago (edited)
I never knew the guests would be so well spoken
7

1 reply

@neilr4867
3 days ago
Most people don’t. They’re very intelligent, well read men who could run rings around pretty much any politician.
2

@Fury851
2 days ago
We need men like Blair and Tom in Britain!
I would be optimistic about our future then
15

2 replies

@Keribou109
2 days ago
Blair came over a few months ago to speak at a Patriotic Alternative conference hosted by leader Mark Collett, check them out
3

@Fury851
2 days ago

@Keribou109 yeah I see it. Just wish his speech was longer

@Hank-ii7pn
3 days ago
I support those guys.
Nobody else in politics cares about Australians.
Can we put them in charge of the lnp?
9

1 reply

@RedemptionDenied666
3 days ago (edited)
Interviewer is not responding to talking points and is changing the subject and interrupting the guests constantly with emotionally charged accusatory statements. Having them on was a brave enough move however it could have been handled more seriously.
9

3 replies

@kenouif
3 days ago
Exactly.
3

@neilr4867
3 days ago
It’s Sam Newman. He’s just like that. Always has been!
2

@user-pr7pd9wd5b
3 days ago
he agrees with a lot of it he’s just being an interviewer and providing pushback. should be glad he had them on. it was good.
1

@garygary2118
2 days ago
Blair and Thomas are great men making so much sense,Sam you sound like Jo Biden.
8

@hangingwithmatty9465
3 days ago
Go read the talmud…and be horrified
14

@ginjabear6664
1 day ago
Thank you for having Tom and Blair on. They’re awesome
4

@river6634
3 days ago
Hail victory. Australia for the white man.
9

@greekgod41
1 day ago
Gave this video 12 minutes, but had to stop because the interviewer was pathetic, he kept interrupting, his speech was umming and aaaahing all the time. I think he is far too old and he let his bias against Australian Nationalism corrupt the interview
6

@theyatsyspam
3 days ago
they’re… cogent, normal people
11

@EyDolf
2 days ago
Tom and Blair sound wonderful! I’ll have to look into the things they discussed, very thought provoking.
4

@ness111555
3 days ago
Great work Lads.
10

@PrussianBlu3
3 hours ago
Im 12 minutes in and this host is effing horrible. He keeps tripping over the Hitler quagmire and doesn’t let Thomas and Blaire say their piece.
3

@paulpettitt4679
3 days ago
Definitely they are winning you over Sammy
10

@rayWinstone-ud9th
3 days ago
What’s odd is that every western country has this problem and it only really started after ww2.
6

1 reply

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
Exactly

@Ralphski-r6c
3 days ago
Great Interview
11

@MarketInsights-jq3cl
2 days ago
well done lads
7

@DrillEntertainmentNetwork
2 days ago
Terribly conducted interview but its good to hear Tom and Blair
11

@winstonwolf5706
2 days ago
This dude is peak boomer.
7

@kochamoplamerive3868
3 days ago
Awesome
11

@Jackhands0me9
3 days ago
It’s good to see someone giving them a platform to state their views. This is supposed to be a free country, if someone’s ideas are ridiculous what harm is there in letting the speak.
Seems the government and media don’t want t people to hear them for a reason..
6

@CrunchyMom88
2 days ago
You just hate agreeing with them on anything, don’t you?
9

@GerNiels
3 days ago
Australia for the white man
8

@farright118
3 days ago
15:00 good question blair. Alot of people agree with the 60’s but dont release it was a white australia back then
12

1 reply

@stompinknowledge3968
5 hours ago
Sam, I feel you did the right thing having these guys on. If we’re to counter extremism, no matter what side, this is all we need to achieve that – allowing representatives of viewpoints to speak and the public to tease out their own perspective from the horses mouth. It shouldn’t be normalised that Governments legislate to shut down ANY speech on basis of belief or group association – no matter how good the reasoning may seem in the moment, its a consistent opening move of despotism. We’re not exempt in Australia from being drawn down that path in small steps. America has free speech as a right, and it seems to me that its reliably allowed the individual to live in better conscience where that right is exercised responsibly and accountably. Our attitude in Australia ought to be that we’re able to steward the weight of discourse on our own shoulders.
Kudos, Sam.

@110inshallah
3 days ago
For the algorithm
14

@Michi444-8
2 days ago
great interview – we need to hear these voices.
6

@Liv1ngTehDream
3 days ago
Could have watched a few more hours of this
11

@darrensmith88008
1 day ago
22,000 views
Sam. Highest ever! You just gotta have them back mate! Don’t let the jewish elite shut down your freedom of speech mate
4

@reaperanon979
3 days ago
Not sure if you read the comments Mr. Newman, but I believe you asked a good question about hate speech which I wish they answered. You are absolutely correct that “hate speech” can fan the flames and turn into physical violence and your example of Palestinians vs. Jews was very apt as well.
The question then becomes: is it worthwhile to import these groups of people only for the government to have to babysit them and their foreign feuds? Is it worth importing them if it necessitates censoring the speech and even the thoughts of Australians? If you have to institute tyranny for foreigners to live comfortably in your nation, then by default I don’t believe they are making it a better place at all.
13

@fordstrokers
2 days ago
I have no idea who the interviewer is, but he is quite the insufferable boomer.
8

1 reply

@MidlifeRenaissanceMan
3 days ago
15 minutes up. Waiting for the screeching to begin
14

@TrimbakkiFonElsass
2 days ago
Great interview, thanks for giving them a chance to speak
4

@Eli-xt7gn
3 days ago
Blair & Tom are like good cop, bad cop lmao
9

@zaza3575
2 days ago
Sam just reminds me of that UK presenter that talks over his guests. Exciteable Sam. Interesting guests, learned a lot.
7

1 reply

@someguy516
2 days ago
He’s uncomfortable but he’s courageous and noble for giving them time and space to speak
1

@PenitentPiglet
3 days ago
Terrible interviewer. Kept interrupting. Boys did well in spite of it.
10

@talk2thoran
3 days ago
Congrats to Sam and the team for supporting free speech!
6

@Martiniddelina
3 days ago
Apart from the Hitler bit and the holocaust, I agree with them especially the part that we cannot afford a roof over our head.
34

9 replies

@Maza675
3 days ago
That’s why those subjects are always brought up first, so you batten down the hatches and become somewhat resistant to everything else they have to talk about.
20

@alpine7891
3 days ago
Maybe you should look into it. We’ve been lied to.
23

@Researchthejoos
3 days ago
Research
11

@Charless_Martel
3 days ago
just a matter of time untill the veil will be lifted.
16

@fascistzoomer
3 days ago
Have you actually tried to dive into the topic?
6

@HuWhiteDeath
3 days ago (edited)
Our (White peoples) well being is more important than obsessing over WW2, and try to amend for it or appease non-Whites that cry about it all the time, or any other historical period for that matter.
6

@sianbaldock9670
3 days ago
I totally agree

@littlefox2324
3 days ago
read some David Irving books. You might surprise yourself
2

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
Now ask yourself why something that supposedly happened thousands of miles away 80 years ago to non European people is the reason you’re not supposed to entertain these men’s talking points
2

@TheDaskell
3 days ago
After this interview you can guarantee there will be a lot more members of the NSO. Excellent
interview Sam.
5

@freyast2213
3 days ago
He’s 80??? Dam he’s a handsome man for being that old. I’m not familiar with him before now, it was a decent interview. He obviously disagrees with them, but that’s to be expected I suppose.
10

1 reply

@theindiescientologypodcast5112
3 days ago
i think what makes this so funny is how passionate tom is and how old sammy is and how blair just sits there smiling, its like a marx brother sketch
6

1 reply

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
Indeed…
Isn’t it just.

@paulpettitt4679
3 days ago
Not just about colour it’s all about culture
13

3 replies

@Itsmeetc
3 days ago
Culture is downstream from race
19

@imperialhonorguard1483
3 days ago
culture comes from race
14

@AeneasSaturn
3 days ago
Race>Culture>Politics
1

@redoz9768
3 days ago
Great podcast. Thanks for letting these guys be heard.
6

@greenygreen8253
3 days ago

20

@TTJ876
7 hours ago
Well done lads
2

@Natsoc04
2 days ago
Thomas and Blair are correct. Watch Europa the Last Battle
19

3 replies

@Comatosedpeanut
2 days ago
Where can I actually watch that movie?

@Student____2025__1
2 days ago
That movie is full of inaccuracies. See Keith Woods’ analysis of it.
2

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
Stu Peter’s
Occupied

@troyhier6509
1 day ago
very interesting interview Sam, can we have a follow up?
5

@hosannainthehighest
3 days ago
This guys a terrible interviewer
10

1 reply

@noglobo
3 days ago
No he isn’t, he is clearly worried about the backlash but we should be thankful to him for giving them a platform.
5

@cl4998
2 days ago
Viewer from the USA, great episode!
6

@MrForeign14
3 days ago
o/
9

@henrikjohansson1252
2 days ago
Fully agree with Tom and the boys. Stay strong lads.
Hails from Sweden
5

@berimbolo8178
3 days ago
Christ is King
10

@rickyseedo4067
3 days ago
Great interview, very reasonable and quite interesting.
6

@Jacksonlamb-y2z
2 days ago
Scroll thruu and see who the majority support
6

@200archiver
3 days ago
amazing podcast
8

@Jason-BMWM5
3 days ago
Well spoken gents
8

@TheExcessMaleBrotherhood
2 days ago
Patriots. They put Sam to shame, can’t disagree with anything they said
5

@filled_soda
3 days ago
Thomas, Blair, Joel and Jacob are great.
7

@Mrflashydude
3 days ago
Thanks for this great interview!
6

@Truthseekerstv17
3 days ago
About time we had an open discussion, we don’t have that anymore. It’s refreshing to speak free of the way anyone feels, without being victimised. That was the old Australia. Listen and respect one’s opinion. Australia has become soft, while we have to respect others ways of life, but not get it on return. Don’t celebrate Christmas it offends, don’t celebrate Mother’s Day, it offends, don’t celebrate Anzac Day, don’t celebrate Australia Day. Wake up people. Stand up for your country. Standards need to be bought back into our country. Remember the time you had to pass a ENGLISH test before
Begin accepted into our great county. The Greeks, Italian and Maltese had to do it. You shouldn’t feel uncomfortable in your own country when you can communicate with others. You get your nails done and the Chinese or Vietnamese is speaking there language laughing and not even acknowledging your existence as a paying customer.
Don’t agree with the aboriginal, but they would tend to like there own culture & it’s a beautiful culture when you learn it. They also agree with Australia being overpopulated with immigrants. Listen to each other and we can all make change. Great interview
7

@puggs1
1 day ago (edited)
Sam you are a terrible host. When you ask your guest a question let them answer instead of butting in
8

@ShaneStrtachan
2 days ago
Glad I watched this.
8

@rikusuoraan
1 day ago
interviewer is interrupting too much, great talk otherwise
6

@derbenutzer5958
2 days ago
Sewell:”I want both of them deported!”
Thanks to everybody involved, was a great listening. T and B made an interesting and fun combination, both did great S created a thrilling debate
4

@dumpsterdiver2069
2 days ago
This interview has been WAY past due and I appreciate you bringing Tom and Blair on your show indeed BUT, your interruption of them is unconscionable! For the listener, it’s absolutely TORTURE and beyond disrespectful that you do this!
8

@mariannepleming8216
3 days ago (edited)
I remember while catching the bus at 5.20am and I raised/heiled my arm to tell the bus where I was. Was I in the wrong. Honestly I don’t know how those boys can sit there and let Sam just rattle on, he is coming across as very dumb. He needs to just sit back and listen and not interupt the boys.
8

@leeroberts9091
2 days ago
Sam’s a bit old these days, his brain doesn’t quite work properly anymore.
8

@volkanphoenix5441
3 days ago
Thank you for allowing these great men on your platform. Great job Thomas Sewell.
2

@TeutonicTrickster
3 days ago
Awesome, loved it.
Great podcast
6

@tomzablee
2 days ago
Interesting interview well done for having the bravery to give them a platform
3

@AntiquityIsResurgent
3 days ago (edited)
39:44, let me make this clear:
Levantines (Jews or Palestinians or any other non-European foreigner) have no right to bring their national or ethnic squabbles to our lands.
6

3 replies

@stigcc
3 days ago
No.

@AntiquityIsResurgent
3 days ago
@stigcc I mistyped: they have no right*
1

@stigcc
3 days ago
@AntiquityIsResurgent Glad you cleared that out!
1

@Timic83tc
2 days ago
Sam is brainwashed
9

1 reply

@Timic83tc
2 days ago
He speaks poison
2

@Woden81
1 day ago
Nationalism and National Socialism are distinct ideologies. While National Socialism incorporated certain nationalist elements, nationalism itself is not inherently tied to National Socialism. In the Australian context, nationalism represents pride in the nation’s Anglo-Saxon and Celtic heritage, as well as a commitment to preserving its traditions and cultural identity.
3

@Ubermensch88.
2 days ago
Good on you for allowing them to express their beliefs, Sam.
4

@100StrongManly
1 day ago
Listening to this before the esafety commission takes it down
6

1 reply

@100StrongManly
1 day ago
Add on: I couldn’t be more against this idea, but I believe in freedom of speech. This especially extends to those who you disagree with

@sassenack1990
3 days ago
Tom Price was a distant cousin of mine. Americans and Australians are one. Throw off the yoke. Love yourselves. You built a wonderland out of a wasteland. We did in the US as well. English, Irish, Scots, and Weish do this. It’s built into our DNA. If you join the military, you’re taught to “improve your foxhole.
6

@brucebogtrotter3430
2 days ago
You made too much sense for him. He wants to join you but does not have the courage!
6

@shoahkahn2692
2 days ago
>”I’ve been to Dachau”
Yiddish-to-English translation: ‘I have been inculcated in the sensationalism of “The Narrative” and, therefore, can only view histories which I have never taken the time to research, through an emotional lens.”
4

@Devoted_Catholic777
1 day ago (edited)
Happy you all sat down and had a talk we need more of this
2

@ausniannative3055
3 days ago
Thank you Sam Newman
8

@dirtymcgreg
3 days ago
You’re a brave man sam. Bravo
8

@JT-5525_
2 days ago
Australia for the white man !!!
5

@SavesWhiteLives
1 day ago
Thank you!
4

@PHRCproject
3 days ago
Great Interview, Thanks Sam for having the guys on
6

@ThisIsJamesL
2 days ago
Odd that Blair and Thomas both had their x accounts zapped just after this
7

1 reply

@pvprangergod4024
2 days ago
why did elon hitler musk ban his own soldiers

@SammyG-123
3 days ago
Looking good for 80 mate!
7

@zarathustratv9114
3 days ago
Thank you for doing this interview, Sam
6

@cjplanes
3 days ago
its kinda funny how newman interrupts sewell but stops talking when blair talks, its the muscles lol
6

@ScanLinkV
3 days ago
Well done for doing this Sam.
8

@ralphkramden2826
2 days ago
So Sam, how’s the comment section look to you? Starting to realize that Aussies don’t want brown immigration and White people simply want to live amongst their own? Much like the brown people who come to White countries all live on the same streets/blocks/communities??
6

@SharkyyHamilton
2 days ago
Sam, there are a bunch of positive comments on here about your guests
7

1 reply

@struthmedia8315
2 days ago
Isn’t it great
7

@kenoats5501
3 days ago
Interesting topic.
May God bless these men and their fight.
Australians need to rise
3

@allisonhughes4348
1 day ago
Gees Sam I thought you said Blair barged his way in and yet here you are having a bloody hour long fireside chat with him. You’re a massive BS artist mate
8

@LawrenceForbes
3 days ago
Sam: Musk didn’t do it as the Nazi salute. Blair: Well, how do you know, have you spoken with him? crickets Love it…
4

@Researchthejoos
3 days ago
Imagine the juice would be fuming now
8

@Juiceb0xable
2 days ago
First answer total fucking legend move
5

@justindl4459
1 day ago
Bro is bryce Mitchell’s hero
5

@joeypaige
1 day ago
Love these boys!!!
4

@Jay-fp8iy
3 days ago
Free speech is great thanks Sam
8

@martyhoare7558
3 days ago
Very brave Sam. An interesting conversation.
7

@unbelievableproductions
2 days ago
Documentary; EuropaTheLastBattle
https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxFMJPkhpN4z8IgQaIiO0TJ8cB5bE15QfW
7

@birchtreebattle7153
3 days ago
These gents are spot on.
7

@SavesWhiteLives
1 day ago
Long Live Australia!
5

@bperez8656
2 days ago
I agree that interviewers order of questions is bad.
Long live free speech regardless of whether you agree or not
5

@MH-db7hl
2 days ago
Alfred Rosenberg was a highly intelligent compassionate and brave man – worth reading his memoirs which were written on death row Nuremberg
6

@WMP-xy5eu
4 hours ago
If you want to know who controls you, look at who you’re not allowed to criticise.
K Strom.
3

1 reply

@SavesWhiteLives
1 day ago
Order, promotes peace.
3

@MagicManintheSky
3 days ago
How long before the people who cannot be named get this video taken down. “Shut it down…the people know…..!!!”
6

1 reply

@charltoncorbett2973
2 days ago
Give it 48hrs, hit piece will be on 9 by the end of the week
3

@plasmapanasonic4741
3 days ago
Awesome work Sam, truely great stuff. Youre a good man.
5

@Charless_Martel
3 days ago
Thomas said he is the only one speaking English in the park, after that he asks what reason he has to make it white.
5

@struthmedia8315
2 days ago
If this goes down, I am ready and primed to mirror it.
7

1 reply

@shoahkahn2692
2 days ago
Any “controversial” uploads should always be backed up as a matter of course… It’s been that way for well over a decade.
1

@sebastienengelhardt
2 days ago
Sam’s noticing of the spiritual enemy will no doubt increase tenfold in the coming days. Pray for the boomers during this turning of the tide
4

@vivrowe2763
1 day ago
Well I have to say this was excellent and glad I watched it. When MSM don’t like something, I know I will.
2

@aclark3959
3 days ago
Why was the interviewer so absolutely rude and annoying
9

2 replies

@BillyBurnsfield
3 days ago
He’s shit scared of being cancelled or something
3

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
@BillyBurnsfield He was cancelled 5yrs ago for saying Geroege Floyd was a POS on air
1

@pinkpoodlepaloma
2 days ago
At long last, a brave interview, thank you
3

@Rucky888
2 days ago
I wont comment on THIS per se
I will simply note, in a society where it is legal AND moral to terminate a baby up to the moment of birth, then there is NOTHING any of these 3 can SAY this could be called unacceptable
5

@milenkovicmarija91
1 day ago
This presenter is a jerk
7

@KissSlowlyLoveDeeply-pm2je
2 hours ago
man Sam is such a passive aggressive woman. he can’t handle any confrontation and just resorts to snark and irony.
1

@MrChickenChoker1
1 day ago
Like it or hate it 3 men that love our Country
4

@bloodresin
3 days ago
Great video, Enjoyed the back and forth, never seen this show before, but as you had them botg on in good faith and let them speak, I’ll subscribe, clearly a person of character
5

@beryldwyer9763
2 days ago
Proud Aussies.
6

@PhilsMyFriend
3 days ago
Sending love from Dixieland \o
8

@ThisIsJamesL
2 days ago
I had the pleasure of meeting Blair and Joel here in England at the PA conferences.
3

@petegibson79
8 hours ago
I came here from a social media feed as there has apparently been quite the backlash regarding these two men’s appearance on this podcast. Allegedly, they have both had their social media accounts cancelled after the appearance. This caught my attention, so I came to listen. I wanted to see what was so terrible about these men. There’s a great deal that concerns me here.
Good for you for having them on and talking to them. I should hope you haven’t experienced any backlash for having them on the podcast, as you heard them out and you challenged them on their opinions. I hate the fact that you were obviously concerned about the fallout that could happen from you sitting in a room and talking to them. That’s all you did, you sat in a room and talked to them like adults should be able to do! What is the problem with that? Their opinions and ideas are interesting and the fact that they hold them is interesting. I’d love to talk to these guys, they’re different, and their ideas are challenging. I’m an adult and I can make my own assessment as to whether I agree with their ideas or not, and I can counter their thoughts with my own ideas. The point I’m making here is this cancel culture, convicted in the court of public opinion for the heinous crime of “wrongthink” notion, is not good, as I get the strong impression that they’d be more open to hearing a counter argument to their ideas than the mainstream is to allowing them to even speak. What is more sinister, the ideas these men have, or a mainstream culture that would snuff out their voices and thoughts so that nobody can hear them or know that they exist?….Adults can make up their own mind. A culture that says that we shouldn’t be allowed to hear a voice says that we are unintelligent, immature, gullible, and incapable of making our own decisions and incapable of composing our own arguments. That sort of censorship and thought control is very concerning. As long as we allow that culture to exist, we validate that culture’s unspoken argument against us.
As for their ideas. My assessment would be that I don’t really find them threatening per se (Jesus Christ, straight into a question about Hitler!….Oof, that was a hard pill to swallow, but good for you for asking it). I would argue that their arguments do step into the world of “supremacy”, but mostly don’t stray beyond representation for a particular ethnic group. Why shouldn’t these men be allowed to speak up for their ethnic group, every other ethnic group has representation. They point out obvious double standards that I think it’s impossible to argue against. Many would argue that it’s racist to allow these ideas to exist………Dear God, it’s equally racist to NOT allow their ideas to exist.
The single biggest problem with their ideas is the idea that we should act upon them (deportations based on skin colour, if you’re not european you shouldn’t have free speech or representation, etc). That is the supremacy part, and in a sane, humane world, that cannot happen as it’s just not realistic. We need to be respectful of each other, and each other’s ideas. The more we push against a group and the more devalue them and their ideas, and the more we hate them, then the more weight we add to the pendulum and that weighted pendulum will swing back at us faster and harder when it does swing back. What I mean is, if we keep pushing this toxic cancel culture idea, and keep denying representation to people like this, then we keep adding to their argument, which will in turn add weight to their movement – we may find ourselves in a world where supremacist ideas start to become the dominant ideas, and we’ll only have ourselves to blame for it. Differences exist in people and cultures, and we need to accept that and start focusing upon how we resolve those differences rather than the differences themselves; Whether he’s aware or not, the guy in the blue shirt (Thomas) actually demonstrated a level of insight on that that seems to have been lost on us as a whole (Aboriginal people, and European settlers may not accept each other’s cultures…so they don’t have to exist in a cultural melting pot, but it’s important that they communicate with each other to find a middle ground that allows both worlds to exist separately, but side by side……of course, he contradicted this by saying that all non european settlers have to be removed from the Australian continent…..people are nuanced, they’re allowed to be, not everything makes sense but we could gain something if we tease out the parts that do). Until we start talking about race, religion, culture in a meaningful way, we will get nowhere further than the point we’re at……which is being at each other’s throats about our differences; demonize these men as much as we like, but I think they’ve stepped outside the comfort zone and are talking about race in a more meaningful way than most of us are: they are nazis (unashamedly so, they said so themselves), but they’re not stupid, and if we dismiss them as stupid and evil and confine them to darkened, hidden corners of the world like monsters, then we are most definitely projecting something about ourselves.
That was one of the most thought provoking podcasts I’ve heard in a long time. Thanks for doing that. I want more; I want to hear from more people with challenging ideas.
1

2 replies

@LimitlessLiving5555
7 hours ago
Watch europa the last battle
3

@1neAdam12
1 hour ago
Lot to unload there.
All that will be answered in full with the documentary suggested by the fellow commenter above me.
ETLB

@CrunchyMom88
2 days ago
Why do you have such vicious tone with these young men?
8

1 reply

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
That sneer was barely kept under the surface.

@iannicholson4437
3 days ago
Interesting interview. I think they’d have more success if they dropped the Hitler fandom, it’s just not palatable to many people. Best to focus on the immediate issues affecting today’s Australians. Good work, Sam! You gave them a fair go and your line of questioning was direct and respectful – to them and your audience. A fine line to walk in this instance!
5

@juts7973
2 days ago
Both Tom and Blair have since had their X accounts deleted.
6

@thinktrove24
2 days ago (edited)
These guys have far right views
that never get a voice in Australia as we cancel anything that falls outside of standard views
EXCEPT, somehow, the extreme woke left views
are forced down our throats and we’re told we’re the far right for NOT being trans fans, invasion fans, misandry fans and on it goes. It is the extreme left that are to thank for much of what is discussed in this interview. A true democracy will always self balance. Well done Sam for bringing balance to media. You clearly don’t support the views
and have done a great job handling an extremely difficult interview.
3

@AyyLmao88
3 days ago (edited)
There is a fundamental difference between thought and action. Speech is an expression of thought, it is completely different and incomparable to physical violence
3

@jonathanm836
3 days ago
Good on you for having these two lads on
4

@someguy516
2 days ago
Sam looks great for 80
7

@antoniostroea4044
2 days ago
Hail Australia o/
7

@trigeek38
3 days ago
Great interview and the guys present a solid defense of their arguments. The term Ordo Amoris has recently taken the spot light here in America. It is relevant to this discussion as well, in that it is their right, and the right of everyone regardless of color or creed, to order and prioritize their love of faith, family and folk above others. It is the natural law
4

@graphenemobil
3 days ago
Good interview
8

@fastfoeword
3 days ago
Good on you Sam for an honest conversation. Very respectable and frankly these two sound like their heads are screwed on just right. Bravo.
2

@watwur
3 days ago
Yeah, the Boys!
5

@hamish4659
2 days ago
Legends, very exciting to see these movements grow in Australia
4

@Willowtree82
1 day ago
As an American who came across this just have a look over here. You see how it’s so divided and how many illegals came in and what’s happening. Don’t become like us
2

@RCD4444
3 days ago
Never considered myself anything like a national socialst but i found myself agreeing with almost everything these guys had to say. I think it might be too late for this sort of thinking to ever win in australia now though. I dont want to discourage the fight for ” our team ” but it does feel like australia is lost.
7

1 reply

@JetsFan123-y4e
3 days ago
No black pilling
3

@mikewilkins4126
1 day ago
Whereas I disagree with you based on the discussion, it took a lot of courage to have them on.
4

@justinhatch1326
3 days ago
o/ Heil Tom and Blair
7

@beryldwyer9763
2 days ago
Very leading questions. Great replies. These guys are direct and just what we need in this Country. People don’t know History and what is actually going on with the “Antiseptic” brain washing.
2

1 reply

@beryldwyer9763
2 days ago
Older Aussies are sleeping rough. I see it everywhere. No foreigners sleeping rough or in caravans and tents. Older Aussies that worked.. paid taxes and fought for our likestyle. I can’t afford to buy a house.
We need to protect our white residents.
1

@jinfdb1026
3 days ago
Good stuff Sam, great vid
7

@gailash1170
3 days ago
Sweden’s in trouble too
8

@gailash1170
3 days ago
Sweden’s in trouble too
6

@kaarinfairfax6665
3 days ago
Great to hear an alternative narrative. Great chat for sure.
4

@BritishJuche
3 days ago
Always glad to hear from people with non-mainstream views

2

@faustgoethe7383
3 days ago
Incredibly based. Hail NSN!
5

@MrStealYaWifey
2 days ago
Great conversation! Surprised the video is still up, while the other two are banned from Twitter. Why did those two get banned? “Free Speech” is semantics.
3

@athulfgeirsson
3 days ago
WE COME FROM THE LAND DOWN UNDER
6

1 reply

@bobbybob-w4p
1 day ago
You better run
You better take cover
2

@syjrun
1 day ago
This is a shit interview maybe it’s good for boomers, but I think sam is out of his depths here and couldn’t. He lacks the philosophical depth to understand their views
and thus investigate them.
I understand they were capitalizing on sams platform.
There were so many good questions that went unasked.
4

@tommytaylor6436
2 days ago
Massive respect to Blair and Thomas
8

@MrCobblecraft
3 days ago
Free speech, you don’t have to agree with them but they also have a viewpoint well done sir.
2

@HermannCortez
3 days ago
Outstanding interview. I hate to say it but these two guys are right..
5

1 reply

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
If they’re right, why would you hate to say it
2

@jtlegionnaire6310
2 days ago
22:59 I disagree for one exception, the only country founded not by true force was Israel, which was gifted to people who didn’t live there by a separate government (the British) and displaced the current inhabitants (Palestinians).
4

@TrimbakkiFonElsass
2 days ago
Great interview, a lot of common sense
3

@rodneytuxedo7559
2 days ago
I never thought I would see the day that this would leak into the mainstream.
1

@Nationalist1212
3 days ago
Blood and honour!
5

@gindphace
2 days ago
Blair is great
6

1 reply

@HP66856
1 hour ago
Both Blair and Tom. I could listen to a few hours of these good men spitting facts.

@thomasthomas1359
4 hours ago
Awesome
1

@peekaytruth5951
3 days ago
About time you had someone who talks sense
5

1 reply

@AntipodeanRose
2 days ago
Peter Kusznir

@pattycrabby9749
25 minutes ago
Ill say this about the old codger; its bold of him to still have this up and i give him props for that. For how much longer though..

@n8errific
3 days ago
Follow all the laws or you’re “antisocial.”
Ok, so when it comes out that taking property from White Australians by force with no compensation is the new law you’ll just go along with it. God forbid you be antisocial and oppose that.
6

@ertanokyay9976
2 days ago

6

@truthseeker2222
3 days ago
Let’s go boys
5

@PrussianBlu3
3 hours ago (edited)
“Why are you so preoccupied with this?”
Dude. You serious?
1

@Justindickson1986
3 days ago
These guys are great
5

@jacksoncapper
3 days ago
Excellent interview; well done.
4

@drewftw2457
2 days ago
You fried this boomers brain.
6

@PrussianBlu3
3 hours ago
27:45 omfg you effing boomer. Completely useless, except when he’s being the useful idiot he is.
2

@followerofthetrain6336
3 days ago
Thomas Sewell is the greatest man of the 21st century
5

@andybarry3435
2 days ago
It’s not an overthrow more a reclamation.
3

@stigcc
3 days ago
I was here. History was made. Thank you o/
3

@justadudedudin
2 days ago
Great interview. Legends
2

@anniew4105
1 day ago
I want to commend the host for even allowing these guys on. I can tell hes not a super political guy but, whether he Knows it or not, he has taken a stand here. Kudos and maith an fear.
1

1 reply

@HP66856
1 hour ago
Until he got pressured by the establishment, then bent the knee to the local rent-a-, who like always rubbed his hands together to make a few shekels off selling garbage t-shirts and promoting his channel. Sam had an opportunity to open the conversation, then immediately slammed the door shut on that at the first sign of pressure. What a coward.

@TheShortStrawMelbourne
1 day ago
For starters, ditch those specs Blair, looks odd. Love your honesty and vulnerability Lads. I agree with the alien political position.
And yes, Very suspicious caravan.
. agreed!
Protect White Australia!
2

@BrandonM
3 days ago
45:57 Best moment, can’t stop laughing. Legend.
5

@followerofthetrain6336
3 days ago
21:10 the chief has spoken. Italians are officially White
5

4 replies

@UltimateLarper
2 days ago
He still wants a Nordic ethnostate in AUS. Open nordicist
1

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
Not really. Southern Europeans aren’t. Most of em.
1

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
@UltimateLarper Based. Germanics are the chosen people. But I like all Europeans. Except southern italians and greeks who are not European.
1

@followerofthetrain6336
2 days ago
This was a tongue in cheek comment. Notice the somewhat tan/brown fist. Yes, we have different flavors amongst our own. I don’t want any of our cousins to be replaced by a brown horde. I think most of the WN stock are Germanic/Anglo.
1

@link2893
3 days ago
Much respect to all 3 yous
3

@jarrid1220
2 days ago
This host has strange facial expressions
5

1 reply

@toneabet6252
2 days ago
He always has, it’s his brand. He’s a sports and TV star that was dropped by Australian media for expressing views
against woke culture over the years. Portrayed by the media as a bit of a has been. He’d be rich and would own multiple properties so would greatly benefit from mass immigration

@leneeslash3989
2 days ago
Your 2nd best episode has 1/4th the views
and 1/10th the likes. (So far). We are inevitable.
4

@AndrewSmithyyy
3 days ago
Thank you
5

@deana_
1 day ago
Learn to listen, Red Shirt. You’re a bad conversationalist.
4

@JamesBkk
3 days ago
Thanks for supporting free speech Sam
3

@epicwinguyz
3 days ago
based
6

@MidlifeRenaissanceMan
3 days ago
I my country too
6

@guenthersteiner3311
2 days ago
Well done Sam
6

@777hdt
1 day ago
Comes down to who we let in. Back in my day it was WOGS and they all became Aussies. The new imports don’t follow our ways. You come here you should follow the Aussie ways.
2

1 reply

@averageindoeuropean8103
3 days ago
W Blair
6

@christianskey4915
2 days ago
In all that you didn’t ask them if they believe in God or jesus but I honestly support a white Australia
4

@joeypaige
1 day ago
After watching this almost all the way through, I have to say that I don’t think the boys said anything really crazy, but the way it was obviously “heard” was pretty crazy.
2

@vbee3682
1 day ago
Interesting interview, thank you Sam
1

@Knightt322
12 hours ago
White bread is the best m8
2

@LisaClough-mr9fu
20 hours ago
Wow… that’s a bit much… they’ve exploited u but u have exposed them… I note they no longer have X profiles…
5

2 replies

@LisaClough-mr9fu
20 hours ago
Love ya Sammy! Time for that road trip!

@Timic83tc
14 hours ago
Australian government and elon are slime
3

@TheShortStrawMelbourne
1 day ago
Reach out to me Lads! I’ll gladly join again!
2

@theindiescientologypodcast5112
3 days ago
interesting guests, great idea sammy
2

@hockly1
3 days ago
Good stuff
4

@calebvinson8703
23 hours ago
We’re so back!!
5

@theindiescientologypodcast5112
3 days ago
this is gold lol
5

@anniew4105
1 day ago
This was pure comedy
1

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Seriously etf is this.. Newman laughing and loving this,
2

1 reply

@mcmelissa6062
2 days ago
Tis Great, huh !? xx
3

@superbuddyfranklin
1 day ago
Great to see the other side. Well done Sam.
5

@BrandonM
3 days ago
Man Newman and blair had quite a few back and forthes lol.
5

@menlikegods363
3 days ago
Bravo!
4

@godant2134
2 days ago
Very good interview
3

@theoloutlaw
2 days ago
Sam conducts a superb interview. I’d listen to him interview anyone all day long.
1

@OzzysRadioHalfHour
1 day ago
Hey Sam, Peekay wants an interview with you
3

@Freedomone153
3 days ago
China did ethnic cleansing. Greeks did ethic cleansing. Mingols… Starlin did ethnic cleansing. Been happening for 1000s of years
2

@gastroacid1971
3 days ago
You should join the group!
5

@d00dmchc
3 days ago
90% of this is just Sam yapping
5

@mikewagner2632
2 days ago
Thank you for the interview!
1

@wolfgangamadeuskeen
3 days ago
Good discussion.
3

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Wayne Carey is such a role model
3

@cuneytbrentvalle7556
3 days ago

5

@Peter-wm8ke
3 days ago
Well done, Sam.
3

@jesuslejesus9051
3 days ago
I respect Sam for doing the interview but my dear God did he drop several megaton BOOOOOMS.
2

1 reply

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
*BOOOOMerisms
2

@Knightt322
13 hours ago
Hahaha this is hehe i love controversy
1

@trollsarebad1541
3 days ago
Just over 27 million in Australia not 25
4

2 replies

@thad1488
3 days ago
Cant even keep up with the numbers, since they’re flooding so many browns in
6

@trollsarebad1541
3 days ago (edited)
@thad1488 Yeah I have no doubt there is a few million more probably 30M is a safe estimate.
2

@kalteisen6185
2 days ago
Love the video. Keep it up fellas.
1

@toonstierney1170
3 days ago
We’re at a generic bottleneck and our folk will pass through
1

@AnarchistBogan
2 days ago
Mad respect for having the stones to have them on Sam
1

@James-mg7fd
2 days ago
Based never replaced
2

@mulgabill5006
17 hours ago
Interview was all over the place
2

@happycarnivore5481
13 hours ago
A failed soldier thinking he is more than that.
1

@Maza675
1 day ago
Worst interviewer ever
2

@dima_r6
2 days ago
Great lads. God bless them
3

@NeznamImesvoje
3 days ago (edited)
SAM HAS DONE NO WRONG
THE MEDIA ATTACK ON THIS GREAT MAN IS AWFUL
SAM WE LOVE YOU.
VERY INTELLIGENT QUESTIONS AND A GOOD INTERVIEW.
KUDOS
MUCH LOVE SAM.
CLEARLY OBVIOUSLY SAM DOES NOT DOES NOT IN ANYWAY AGREE OR ENCOURAGE THESE MEN.
SAM IS A GOOD MAN AND IT WAS A RIVETING INTERVIEW.
KUDOS SAMMY
2

@BasedPewDiePie
3 days ago
Big up Tom and Blair
88
3

@bradcavanagh3092
2 days ago
Now I like curry, but now that we’ve got the recipe, do they really need to stay?
5

1 reply

@pvprangergod4024
2 days ago
actually i dont like my insides exploding

@rarebee3743
17 hours ago
VICTORY VICTORY
2

@EmersonArtwork
2 days ago
O7 to Thomas and Blair … and this brave podcaster.
1

@celineferdinand6944
2 days ago
Great interview, for a Boomer. They seem like good, decent lads who love their people.
8

@HMKT1996
1 day ago
Absolutely kino.
2

@ReggieBlinker-k9e
3 days ago
Three top blokes as far as I’m concerned.
3

@marleneverity1253
2 days ago
It’s not the people’s fault it’s govt not pushing Australian values
2

@NeznamImesvoje
3 days ago
Sam you have done no wrong.
I dont agree with these men, but you asked good questions.
Love ya sammy
Folks having a go at sam are idiots.
3

@DuerstMania
2 days ago
Yaw waythith!
5

@katieladanyi3584
4 hours ago
Im giving you a kicking Sam, for your misrepresentation of these men, in other posts videos! I don’t agree with everything they want. But i 100% don’t agree with the things you’ve said!
2

2 replies

@1neAdam12
1 hour ago (edited)
He had no choice.
It’s either bend the knee to the Levantine apostles, or loose everything, including friends and family.
Now that IS real Power!

@pattycrabby9749
24 minutes ago
​@1neAdam12 he had a choice. The two men he’s throwing under the bus had the same choice and they chose honor and integrity.

@David_dickinson
2 days ago
Making it big move boys, impressive and behind it.
1

@NorthernLycanthrope
3 days ago (edited)
Well that was absolutely painful to listen to. Like being interviewed by a child who’s unable to grasp basic concepts and keeps getting hysterical and off topic. How this Sam guy became famous ill never know. Reminds me of that guy Jeremy Vine here. Can’t stand the bloke.
Perhaps get a brick wall do the next “interview”.
3

2 replies

@magicjohnson3121
3 days ago
He was a football player. That’s why he is famous.
1

@Mothy2014
3 days ago
Sam needs to listen to Joe Rogan. Get some lessons on how to conduct a podcast.
There is a reason Rogan is the number one podcaster in the world.
And there are many more great podcasters.
2

@stephanie795
3 days ago
I want the 80’s back.
10

4 replies

@neilr4867
3 days ago
The 90s would be fine too
2

@HuWhiteDeath
3 days ago
Let’s create a better future instead of just looking back to the past
1

@Heimbach1966
3 days ago
@stephanie795 should of fought harder instead of eating garbage food and clapping at blacks kicking footballs
3

@stephanie795
3 days ago
@Heimbach1966 I don’t eat garbage food and don’t follow footy. Big fail.
1

@chris63952
1 day ago
Sam is too combative
1

@AK4.7.47Cossack
3 days ago

4

@Pugna-cz6gs
3 days ago
o/
6

@Bill87762
2 days ago
Dude almost seems to get it- the cognitive dissonance is real with boomers and gen X
2

2 replies

@nikanton819
2 days ago
Not so much with Gen X. The boomers can never let go of their counter culture hippy movement.
2

@HP66856
1 hour ago
Gen X knows. Boomers are a lost cause.
1

@BorisBugger
2 days ago
You have a home, it is called Britain, and it now needs its most courageous sons.

@FirstNameLastName-o1d
3 days ago
I’d vote for these guys…..
2

@thesystemsucks
3 days ago
jeez sam, showing your age there mate. good interview though. hail victory.
4

1 reply

@X988F
3 days ago
boomers will be boomers. However, this has probably woken sam a little, I’ve been watching the lads for years now, the Adelaide stunt was the best optics they could’ve gotten.
4

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Well as long as Tom and Blair can get along with white people.. same values. Oh god bless Deakin.. and white Daddies..They admit they have read one book
1

@IAmBeanz1
1 day ago
Great stuff guys!

@BillyJoeVal
3 days ago
o/
6

@Dead-bl7to
3 days ago
Thomas is extremely articulate here. He needs to have his own show without Joel rambling.
6

@Ilych367
7 hours ago
first time i’ve ever bothered listening to these guys, i wrote these guys off as just being racist pricks out to cause issues, but after listening to them in this interview i have to admit that they do make a number of salient points.
some of their rhetoric is a bit offputting but they do seem to make a lot of points that i think us aussies who are sick of all the woke nonsense going on would have to agree with.
it seems everything this country does puts refugees, immigrants and ‘oppressed minorities’ ahead of regular everyday working aussies.
i dont know if these guys really hate other races or they’re just taking a pro white stance after this, but i guess that’s enough to be called an evil racist these days anyway.
my first thoughts on these guys might have been based off what i saw in the headlines. silly of me i guess after all the lies during covid to trust the news.
do these guys do their own show to listen to so i can decide for myself instead of what channel 9 said?
1

1 reply

@1neAdam12
1 hour ago
Yes, they both post content on the social media platforms that will have them. I would list them for you, but the ADL censorship algorithms will delete it. Sorry.

@SerenityNow22
2 days ago
If people want more solid content about these topics from a Christian perspective; check out The Stone Choir podcast. You can thank me later.
1

@HeadWest1620
2 days ago
Common sense
3

@Palendrome
2 days ago
Blair sometimes cuts into what Thomas is saying when Thomas is making a really good point. He needs to watch that
1

@DerekGlaubitz-d8t
17 hours ago
What’s with Elon musk doing so called solute and saying Germans should be proud of themselves?????
Anyway to do with Australia we are getting to many ppl come here with not enough housing etc etc etc
1

@jeremylukedominicbate7482
2 days ago
Get yourself de-indoctrinated Sam.
3

@johnnyj-t2e
3 days ago
sam is like an australian biden ffs.
3

1 reply

@neilr4867
3 days ago
He’s the same age and far more with it than Biden
1

@Norrbottning
3 days ago
Newman
4

@dale8535
3 days ago
Warm up the engines…
3

@substancep21
2 days ago

3

@Furiker
3 days ago
This is going to get you in so much trouble holy moly.
1

@shoahkahn2692
2 days ago
YiddIe me this:
How do you take 6 from 15, to end up with 15?
A. You use a “﬩” sign
1

@ABACUSMBS
22 hours ago
o/
3

@australian6983
2 days ago
God bless you Sam, you’re a good man and patriot. I like many other Australians am sick of the woke mob and terrible rhetoric and ideology like Multiculturals, feminism and others. I thank you for remaining firm and true!

@DaviDamir
1 day ago
how did convicts build all of the buildings with stone
1

@azza_88-jl1rp
2 days ago
How are uninformed people (regardless if age) so sure they are right, without corroborating evidence…truly boggles the mind…Boomer headline readers
1

@farright118
3 days ago
0:30 stop getting caught on hitler. Not to say there isnt things we shouldnt look to in nazi germany. I.e like you said national revivial
Just that we should focus on australia and supporting other white coungries
1

@Nats0x
7 hours ago
45:47

@NeznamImesvoje
3 days ago
This is like street talk for Sam.
HAHAHAHAH
Love ya sam
You’re a legend Sam.
YOU HAVE DONE NO WRONG!
PPL LOVE UR WORK.

@tompchromedome
2 days ago (edited)
The 1960s were better.
This interviewer needs to let his guests speak rather than using his time going oooh haaaaa hummmmm to say nothing and block the guest info. poor interviewing style.
post ww2 Australians were never asked and never voted on this mass immigration and still to day why not like the Abo vote , have a vote on immigration and the ideas spoken about here.
2

1 reply

@thepaedophileprofit3062
1 day ago
They have never permitted it to be an election issue because if they did the voters would have revoked the ‘mandate’ for the uni-party to enact the ‘multi-cultural’ future they wished to impose. All western nations have had the same fate thrust upon them, none of them, not one of those regimes ever had a mandate to do so stemming from the population having voted for it. Both Libs and Labor have always agreed between themselves to both take the same course and to never have immigration as an election issue to be debated, elections are only fought on issues that boil down to where and for what the money stolen by government should be spent, elections are never fought over issues which the ruling classes are determined to enact, as they know that the population would reject their agenda if ever given a say on it.
1

@henrysunday
1 day ago
When a black woman speaks, i listen
4

@ThisIsJamesL
6 minutes ago
#FreeSamMelia

@limorweingarten9378
3 days ago
I have so many questions to ask them.
1. What happens to white people who march with the so-called Pro-palestine or the good white people who support the Jewish community from antisemitism?
2. What happens to all the children born from mixed marriages, e.g. Chinese and a white person?

@jjohnson6471
1 day ago
I respect Sam for having them on the podcast but he’s obviously in mental decline

@kelvinbaldwin2117
3 days ago
Well done Sam
1

@mitchellkoch7122
3 days ago
Well done Sammy you legend
1

@Sir_Richard_Stewart
2 days ago (edited)
Tom. You are Hebrew. YES. Aboriginals were not Here first. They are a mix of India and North African. And we’re chased here.And they Genocided The Great Pygmy Nation Of the Great South Land
2

@DaviDamir
1 day ago
REV 2:9
3

@scottbingham4097
2 days ago
46:02
1

@Bigred-ie1nk
1 day ago
Im more Sam level racist than these guys
1

@WikingNordlan
3 hours ago
46:05 Did he say what I think he said?

@trexx32
1 day ago
He said nothing wrong
1

@talk2thoran
3 days ago
“white supremacists”? When was that term ever used or able to be imputed?
1

@nearlythere1957
2 days ago
what happened at cathederal mountain and the grampians .

@MrX-wd8cm
3 days ago
Is that the Austrian Painter or Charlie Chaplin ? LoL
1

@piscator57
3 days ago
The constant tapping on the desk is aggravating AF…..
1

@farright118
3 days ago
0:20 sam jumped in a bit hot
1

@michaelirish1445
3 days ago
MINUTE 46 WHAT A GOTCHA MOMENT!face-purple-cryingface-green-smilingface-orange-biting-nailsface-fuchsia-tongue-outface-orange-raised-eyebrowtrophy-yellow-smiling

@giggygiggy1393
2 days ago
Woah………………strap in Folks………….

@kimberlyannhoustonchezann7087
2 days ago
NSN w
2

@CrunchyMom88
2 days ago
32:40
2

@timmcgrath9708
3 hours ago
Sam. Stop interrupting.

@24tommy109
2 days ago
46:06
1

@pecc2081
3 days ago
22.08 what is he looking at
1

@philbromleysphotography8414
3 days ago
God Sam why do you bother doing these interviews you’re too old, they walked all over the top of you. And you wonder why they keep talking over the top of because you sit there and mumble all the time you can’t put two words together. You’re too old to try to battle with people of that age..
1

2 replies

@HP66856
3 days ago
What a ridiculous comment. Based on the support in the comments, he’s getting a standing ovation for being brave enough to interview them, when the media & govt have slandered them and blocked anything they said. I say well done, Sam, for being one of the very few in this country for showing any courage at all on this topic.
2

@philbromleysphotography8414
2 days ago

@HP66856 it’s not about the content or the guest that come on regardless who they are. Sam can’t interview he mumbles all the time and loses his chain of thought over and over. He gets frustrated when they talk over him because his mumbling he can’t get two words out. He needs to hang up the boots or get behind the camera and let Sue take over.
1

@dime5984
3 minutes ago
YOU ARE AMALEK

@davidweisinger834
3 days ago
Good on you Sam for having them on. Sunlight is the best cure for the good, the bad and the ugly. Some points are good and well reasoned. Other points were simply extreme and should be mocked. The constant interruption was rude and irritating but otherwise an interesting perspective.
1

@tengenuzui8425
2 days ago
\o

@pelagonianlion8276
1 day ago
What’s the border line of who is white? Is it some arbitrary standard based on appearance, language, culture, history, geography? Or a mix of all of these? We know who is human for example, and this is fact. But seems to me the the standard of whiteness is just up to an individuals arbitrary opinion.
3

@shoahkahn2692
2 days ago
Thomas Sowell agrees with them.

1 reply

@TheIsaac41
2 days ago
Eh not really

@Vloke6
2 days ago
Wrong demographic numbers. As of 2021 there were ~25m Australians and ~18-19 of those were White.

@mullythebully5557
2 days ago
o/
2

@WildRandysWorld
9 hours ago
King Boomer

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago
The interviewer was fair and laudable. Blair was great and displayed better social skills here than Tom. Tom needs to relax and listen more and stop trying to out-talk and over-talk people in a conversation.
3

1 reply

@HP66856
3 days ago
He is given very few opportunities to speak, and when he does the government and media in this country misquote and slander him. I think he did a brilliant job, and would happily tune in to hear these two be interviewed again.
3

@BinaryBunyip
1 day ago (edited)
Wasn’t there some theory that everyone on Earth could live in an area the size of Texas, and be cozy? Either way, I believe that there’s enough land out there for everyone. No country needs to take over anywhere. Just need to fix their own nation as well. Hopefully we can see this thing happen. Less corruption, so people do not have to abandon their homes in the 1st place. Think about it. Deep down, people are ‘separatists’. Or do we have a separate section, for all cultures in every country?
Diversity, is not what many people think it is. It’s ‘diverting’. Splitting. Not to say, we can’t all get along… Sure we can.

@farright118
3 days ago
21:00 ive always looked at australia through a racial lens not an ethno lens hoever i get the argument

@BigT-Tv82
3 days ago
Sam Newman for prime Minister?…

1 reply

@travv88
3 days ago
Tom, Blair and Joel.
2

@WestCoastR1der
11 hours ago (edited)
Worst interviewer ever, unwatchable
2

@queenie8896
2 days ago
Unbelievable

@Sir_Richard_Stewart
2 days ago
It wasn’t 6.000.000 . It was over 60.000.000
1

1 reply

@HP66856
1 hour ago
Boomer
1

@Billy_BrownCow
2 days ago
Which government agency runs the roman circus, without free bread?
1

1 reply

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
The miserly priesthood

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago
Tom, it’s “homogeneous.” Not “homogenous.”
1

14 replies

@reaperanon979
3 days ago
Homogenous, homogeneous, homologous, etc all practically mean the same thing.
5

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago

@ I know that people will understand what he means, and the words are often used interchangeably now after years of people mistakenly saying “homogenous” when they meant “homogeneous” to the point where the bastardisation has become accepted. But one is correct for what he means to say and one isn’t. And he might as well just say it correctly.
1

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago
@TheIsaac41 the improper word choice here isn’t a grammar issue. It’s using the wrong word.

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago
@Heimbach1966 it’s called having standards. Perhaps you can’t relate. And since Tom uses the word often when talking about the kind of society he prefers, then he might as well use the right word. Frankly, correcting him here ought to be welcomed, as it can help him. A lot of people make the same mistake. It’s not just him.
1

@Heimbach1966
3 days ago
@Student____2025__1
Sperg more. People like you end up as cannon fodder for browns
3

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago

@ And you’re mad because I corrected someone’s improper word use. I don’t even feel the need to respond in kind nor attempt to insult you. I’m just glad that everyone reading will now know to say “homogeneous” and NOT “homogenous” from now on. You’re welcome.

@TheIsaac41
3 days ago

@ you’re kinda proving my point, caught up in irrelevant details.
2

@TheIsaac41
3 days ago
@Student____2025__1 maybe actually engage with the argument silly billy

@TheIsaac41
3 days ago
@Student____2025__1 and outside of linguistics discipline the use of the word grammar seems to be acceptable in this context. So what’s your issue with Tom and Blair exactly?
2

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago
@TheIsaac41 regarding “homogeneous,” why not just thank me for pointing out the error and move on? And as to my opinion of Tom and Blair as communicators, I think Blair is far superior. And I don’t think nationaIist activism needs to be centered around WW2 or hitIer or a certain ethnoreligious group. Tom is too self-indulgent and talks AT people in conversations like this. He seems more interested in rehabilitating hitIer’s reputation than appealing to, and advocating for, White people. He doesn’t have an easy manner about him like Blair does. Nationalism doesn’t need to be a hitIer worship cult. And back to the subject of word use: someone should inform Tom that Australians don’t use the word “volk.” Like I said, he’s self-indulgent, and he’s not really listening to the people he’s supposed to be appealing to. Tom needs to learn to chill out and give other’s the floor and acknowledge their concerns and perspectives. It seems like he just loves to hear himself talk. Anyway, Blair seems to have none of those problems, and I think this interview would have been a lot more successful if it had just been Blair being interviewed alone.
1

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
​ @Student____2025__1 but you haven’t corrected “someone’s” grammar, youve just commented on a YouTube video
1

@TheIsaac41
2 days ago

@ Jesus dude chill out all over a word you’ve gotta be taking the piss

@TheIsaac41
2 days ago
@Student____2025__1 and I’m pretty sure Tom’s just pronouncing “folk” in a residual NZ accent. What are you on about dude. Tbh I thought Blair needed to chill a bit and give Sam a bit of slack n ease him into it. He was a guest after all

@TheIsaac41
2 days ago (edited)
@Student____2025__1 what you prefer some sort of vague airy fairy civic nationalism? You’re very boring

@dfveiga9
2 days ago
Rhodesia, South Africa, Australia, NZ… These countries unfortunately got it all wrong. I get it, white europeans (anglos for the most) were the ones who built up theses places – the people before them barely left a footprint – but it’s still “their place” of origin. Claiming it today would actually against non-whites claiming their right to be in Europe, the place of origin of the whites. Which is their original “Lebensraum”.
The whites wanting to live outside of Europe should be the ones wanting to mingle with the local population.
1

@RaoulLawson
3 days ago
Onya sam

@gordopark13
2 days ago
I’m 7th Gen Australian, 20 year Veteran and I’m of Polynesian Trinidadian decent. So I’m not a real Australian because I’m not white? Lol
1

5 replies

@jamesbrittain5659
2 days ago
Are you an Anglo-Celt?
If not then stop your whinging.
9

@gordopark13
2 days ago
@jamesbrittain5659 you can have a say if you actually fought for your country if not take a backseat champ!
1

@struthmedia8315
2 days ago
Trinidad?
That’s blatantly not Australian
Or European
6

@layersoftruth8115
2 days ago
You said it yourself your “Polynesian Trinidadian”.
1

@azza_88-jl1rp
2 days ago
Who do you think you’re fooling, doubt your grandparents were born in Australia.Look up the meaning of nation…we are not from the same group of peoples, I’m Anglo-Saxon not matter what country I’m born in. I care about those that are closest genetically to me. i.e I care more about my kids then my cousins kids, i care more about my cousins kids then my 2nd cousins kids ect If you’re not European my concern for your people is not our issue. If anyone can become Australian then it means nothing.
2

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago
Tom is exhausting. I wish this were just a talk between Blair and the host. Blair was making great points. And we don’t need to make pro-whlte politics a hitIer fest. Nationalism doesn’t revolve around WW2 history.
7

7 replies

@PhilipCunningham1788
3 days ago
WW2 is the reason we are at this point
14

@matt79hz
3 days ago
Tom didn’t steer that conversation, he would have preferred to keep it in the now but if asked something he’ll answer honestly.
8

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago

@ Tom likens modern day Australia to Weimar Republic, which was prior to the war. Regardless, I think Tom ought to listen to all the people telling him they are pro-whlte but not really interested in basing their Australian nationaIist activism around fanboying for historical leaders from another country. If that is the only way Tom can think of to promote much-needed nationalism, then he lacks imagination and sense. Tom is too self-indulgent. He seems like a very sincere guy, and I wish him well, but I think we can do better when it comes to nationaIist activism and communication.
4

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago (edited)
@matt79hz I noticed it was Blair who tried to shift the focus of the conversation. Tom seemed happy and eager to hold forth at length any chance he got about his worship of hitIer. I just don’t think we should turn nationaIist efforts into a hitIer worship cult. Yes, the never-ending guilt trip propaganda about the war is ridiculous, but the answer isn’t to try to always center our efforts around WW2 events.
3

@neilr4867
3 days ago
Blair has been through the ringer in life. It shows. He’s calm and measured, and obviously well read. When he speaks, you listen.
5

@Student____2025__1
3 days ago
Absolutely. Blair is better at conversation and relating to the other person in an easy manner. Tom often just talks at the other person and expresses little interest in understanding the other person’s concerns.
1

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
Tom got his back up because the very first question by Sam was designed to do that. Hence Tom then was on the defensive for the rest of the show
1

@TheMonochord
2 days ago
I tune into Blair and Sewell to study there political perspective even though I assume they would consider me a traitor given my partner is not white… but that being said …I can understand their concerns for the incremental erosion of the white race from the planet and their desire to preserve it.If they want to retain their ‘purity’ and just be left alone, so be it. I just wish their affiliate’s would show more class and not use cheap pejoaitives like the ‘N word’ ect in their discourse . There is no dignity in it.
2

1 reply

@OVERLORDTB0NE
2 days ago
I feel almost the exact same way as you. I’m fascinated by them, some of the things they have said has hit me like a truck, we feel forgotten as a people. I think I would be also be considered a traitor for the same reason

@Basedbae
2 days ago
What is the go with the categorisation of your podcasts? It’s ridiculous and make no logical sense

@kalxtube
1 day ago
Id be interested to know their thoughts on an Australian kid with obvious asian background who wear the auscam unifprm on our ships and fly our F18’s.
1

2 replies

@lannybuddrick2909
1 day ago
It is not the rare exception that is important, but the norms, because there are millions of people who are migrating that are fundamentally different.

@HP66856
1 hour ago
Fly for China.

@joshicortez1537
1 day ago
You helped their recruitment with this podcast. Not my place to say if that’s good or bad but the fact is you have helped them and their cause more than you have hurt it. All publicity is good publicity & these Nazis are getting plenty of it .
1

2 replies

@elainesabatino7467
15 hours ago
Cry Harder, SoyJack!

@HP66856
1 hour ago
Good.
1

@Knightt322
13 hours ago
Elon musk is a hero
1

1 reply

@pattycrabby9749
17 minutes ago
Really?
The day after this interview blair and Tom were suspended from X
The day after that, the rest of their group’s spokesmen were suspended from X
Our leaders gave Elon a list of names to ban and he did it
“Hero”

@davidanthony7495
2 days ago
Terrible Interview!!!
Thomas shot himself in the foot!
Know when to shut up Thomas! :)))

2 replies

@FLmetalhead
2 days ago
How did Thomas shoot himself in the foot?
2

@jurrianfeitsma9566
2 days ago
All I saw was a boomer mind shorting out over speech that makes perfect sense
2

@gary1705
3 days ago
Sam you should have invited Pauline Hanson to join you
2

@macleayexplorer
3 days ago
The National Socialist leader is from a South African background. Maybe he is angry at what happened in his country, but I dont think his ideas are relevant to Australia.
His “authority or arrogance” is very Dutch ( white South African).
Thank you for bringing this podcast to us.

3 replies

@macleayexplorer
3 days ago

@ – Im not referring to Musk.

@KyleShreds6391
3 days ago
Tom Sewell isn’t a south African. His family were native Brits and he was born in NZ. He did have family in Rhodesia though. Either way, you’re wrong. Not wanting all white nations to turn into a global south africa is not a bad thing. It’s basic self preservation.
6

@AJWRAJWR
3 days ago
We just had a referendum over whether to hand our country over to the blacks like the South Africans had to. And you’re assuming he’s Dutch, but obviously white South Africans can be Anglos too.
3

@coreyworthingtonii9230
2 days ago
Blair has always come across as a numpty, but Thomas makes very good points. Even if you disagree with him, he makes some valid points.
2

2 replies

@audhumbla6927
2 days ago
Please quote one single thing Blair said here that wasnt sensible and true and right?
5

@oppje6188
2 days ago
Blair has charisma imo easier for the average guy/boomer to understand
3

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
They are not smile lines.. they are stretch marks.

@AnthonyTreeve-xo6ih
3 days ago
Blair stated that last year 1.1M migrants entered Australia, of which most were Indian or Chinese. INCORRECT. Last year, net migration reduced by over 10% (down from 500k to around 445K)
Indians accounted for 72K, Chinese 50K and combined UK/NZ was 45K. Of the 445K total net migration, 90% are on TEMPORARY visas. It’s a different kettle of fish when you lay the FACTS on the table!
1

3 replies

@ddddddddddddddddrop3961
3 days ago
In the 2023-24 financial year, a total of 1.1 million new migrants entered Australia, which is the highest in recorded history, and is the second year in a row where more than one million migrants have entered the country.
8

@wolloms
3 days ago
So around 500k scammed the system legally. And 500k entered illegally. It needs to end.
6

@ddddddddddddddddrop3961
3 days ago
@wolloms Anthony’s data was is NOM, but Blair was using total.

@Mat8aios26
1 day ago
Sam great interview, the only thing I agree with Tom and Blair is nationalism (every person from their own country should love their country) apart from that they are completely wrong. I do not believe in a “White Australian” as I had experienced racism which wasn’t nice and hard , everyone should be welcome here in Australia regardless of race, religion or sex! Assimilation (if I move to Japan, I would respect their laws, learn their language and learn their way of life but I would never try to implement what I believe or want! ) is key because Australia let us keep our language, religion and culture. I was born here, my parents migrated from Greece to Australia which is the best country. People need to migrate here from all countries so long as it’s through the legal process. As I said, great interview Sam but these 2 guys are bat chit crazy! All people should live in harmony together!
1

@wabisabi3619
1 day ago
Mass immigration, not immigration, is an issue in australia and the west.
But larking as nazis and holding these disgusting beliefs doesn’t help us solve that. If anything it makes it worse.
So once again being in the sensible centre is made difficult by idiotic extremists.
1

4 replies

@pinball1974
1 day ago
The sensible centre – stand for nothing, fall for anything.
6

@Researchthejoos
1 day ago
Tell me how upset you are and how much you are trying to cope ?
4

@frankly88
1 day ago
Cool Story NoN yt you are still getting deported
3

@HP66856
1 hour ago
What disgusting beliefs? These two young men are well read, educated, and historically accurate in their statements.

@petesmitt
2 days ago
This interview really brought the jw haters out of the basements..

7 replies

@struthmedia8315
2 days ago
Lmfao. Where? I haven’t seen any comments whining about Jews. You’re the one bringing them into it.
10

@NelsonMandela961
2 days ago
Better than crawling up out of a NYC drain.
3

@shoahkahn2692
2 days ago
If wanting to survive as a given people equates to “jw hating”, it must als equate to human loving. So, therefore, the only question is: Is “hating” and being around to do so, better than not being around any longer?
1

@shoahkahn2692
2 days ago
@struthmedia8315 It’s likely a JIDF brigade member dropping by — just ignore them.
5

@azza_88-jl1rp
2 days ago
@petesmitt What “truths” are afraid of scrutiny? Why would you make it a federal “crime” for simply questioning the accuracy of an “official event”?
1

@petesmitt
2 days ago
@azza_88-jl1rp Not at all; I’m all about free speech, including the freedom to criticise stupidity..

@azza_88-jl1rp
2 days ago
@petesmitt okay what about the other things I mentioned?
1

@queenie8896
2 days ago
This is no longer 1920!!!!

6 replies

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
That’s true. It’s 10000 worse. Europe has never experienced anything like what it is now, not USA either. Unprecedented “migration”.
2

@AJWRAJWR
2 days ago
Have you researched the Weimar Republic. This is exactly like 1920’s Germany.
3

@queenie8896
2 days ago
@LordOfSweden being anti immigration is one thing but how is it possible to deport half of the Australian population just because they aren’t white and placing the indigenous people somewhere else and reinstate segregation again. Do you really think this will happen again?

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
@queenie8896 How is it not possible? How did they get there? Same way they got there to live off the sweat and struggles of anglos. The indigenous population can get a piece of land and have their own nation imo.
1

@queenie8896
2 days ago

@ hahahaha righto

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago

@ Right. So it’s possible to people to go somewhere, but not go back? It’s like an immoable law How convinient.
And if you don’t think there is a difference – live like you preach, move to Haiti and Liberia. See how you like it.
2

@Sir_Richard_Stewart
2 days ago
Tom. You are Hebrew.
1

@pvprangergod4024
2 days ago
they forgot u have to do roids and have under 120 iq to join nsn
1

3 replies

@HP66856
2 days ago
Oh the absolute irony of this comment, considering the IQ of an average Australian is 99 (and 65 for aboriginals, based on global statistics). So yes – I’d assume anyone associated with National Socialists do indeed have an IQ well above the country’s average, because they can assess exactly what is happening in this country and they can see the solutions to fix it. Well done, Tom and Blair – you have done your folk proud
8

@shoahkahn2692
2 days ago
@HP66856 That, and anyone who cites the “I. Q.” meme, instantly disqualifies themselves from the discourse. For it’s a grade school level, Dunning-Kruger give-away of one not having any argument, and only engaging in order to derail.
1

@azza_88-jl1rp
2 days ago
@shoahkahn2692 People may cope about IQ tests…but it measures something that is consistent the world over, so whatever it measures some groups consistently under perform compared to other groups.
1

@glenferrieroadhawthorn
3 days ago
35:00 “I have infintely more in common with canadians, than I do with Chinamen” despite starting a business for years called Compass One with Dun Chu and Obie Chan as per the Daily Telepgraph
3

@hotkeyafl
1 day ago
These guys are dorks no matter what their belief system.

1 reply

@elainesabatino7467
15 hours ago
Cry Harder, SoyJack!

@Sir_Richard_Stewart
2 days ago
Tom. You Are totally Wrong about Germany
2

@pgstudio4651
1 day ago
If you guys changed and focused on just a Christian country, then I would be on board… How ever Christians come from every Continent including Africa, Asia and the Middle East. If Australia did this.. we would be the envy of the world.
1

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Sam… vvvvv vile lol

@charliec8013
2 days ago
Is this whole comment section populated with their group? It looks like a paid review page. Many people haven’t a clue who these people are, had no time to research, so its a tad weird.

4 replies

@someguy516
2 days ago
I’m black, I know exactly who they are and who you think they are, they are are correct.
5

@imperialhonorguard1483
2 days ago (edited)
I’m an American from Oregon
2

@struthmedia8315
2 days ago
“Most of the comments here are supporting nationalists that love their people and nation, CAN ONLY BE ASTRO TURFED”
Cry more. Perhaps it’s YOU who doesn’t know who Sam Newman is,absolutely bloody huge name in Australian culture, it’s absolutely realistic that him sitting down with these 2 would go viral, and appeal to the majority of people thathave NO REPRESENTATION in parliament
6

@carltheflpatriot69
7 hours ago
@charliec8013 I’m an American in Florida and these guys are just speaking the truth that the majority of people are scared to talk about.

@samgribbles
3 days ago
The fact that people are supporting these two is truly disturbing. What they present as ‘facts’ is nothing more than a twisted misinterpretation of conspiracy theories, exaggerated to the point of absurdity. At best, it’s ignorance amplified by blind faith; at worst, it’s calculated manipulation fueled by hate.
If you support these views
, you should take a hard look at what you’re defending. Educate yourself (if you’re capable of it) on the nonsense they spew, and try to see through their vile rhetoric. While you’re at it, look up the Dunning-Kruger effect—it might help explain why they, and those who follow them, are so convinced of their own delusions.
1

3 replies

@HP66856
2 days ago
Calm down, Dvir.
5

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
Name calling will get you nowhere samgribbles, if you have better arguments, then use them. You’re not gonna convince me that they are not right with jjust calling people names, that will never work. Speaking about dunning-kruuger. I got a bachelor’s degree with perfect grades. I base my opinion on history, lived experience and logic.
1

@noglobo
2 days ago
And now, back to the programming for you
2

@anthonycullen1961
3 days ago
Not sure worthy of a platform but I’m a free speech absolutist so fair enough doing it but there’s not a lot of rigorous thought going on here.

2 replies

@thad1488
3 days ago
More than worthy
7

@HP66856
3 days ago
I’ll agree to disagree. I found this interview refreshing – most are too cowardly to dare have these two guests on, for risk of the traitorous government and media in this country coming down on them like a tonne of bricks.
1

@GregGreenery
1 day ago
The guy wouldn’t let Sam talk. Came off like a real grasshole

@clunie1959
3 days ago
I’m a white Aussie male and prefer Asian female companionship
2

5 replies

@frankly88
3 days ago
You can enjoy them in some asian country then
19

@BillyBurnsfield
3 days ago
You can go live there then mate
11

@Hank-ii7pn
3 days ago
Gross.
Imagine making little mongrel Asians..
5

@clunie1959
1 day ago
@frankly88 I alternate between Thailand and Australia, I’m living the life.
1

@clunie1959
1 day ago
@BillyBurnsfield a bit hot for me, thank you for your advice.

@cccccc1
2 days ago
Thomas should have come on by himself.

1 reply

@Drummondsqorld
3 days ago
I wanted to like these guys , but listening to them, whack jobs. I get what they are saying but their delivery is horrible
2

4 replies

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago (edited)
Ohhh Blair found Mein Kamf in Polyester… the.best independent book shop that got raided for selling banned books and videos…but avoided all of the other brilliant books. Way to out yourself as a terrorist

1 reply

@fishsteak3246
3 days ago
Lmao he could have read many other books from there but why would he even bring those up when it wasn’t relevant to the topic at all?
How is he a terrorist, he hasn’t done any terrorism and advocates against it himself in the video
2

@jackmag4056
2 days ago
Thomas doesn’t even look white , Turk or Greek

1 reply

@gepettosplaylists
1 day ago
Why?
Because he has a tan?

@bruceanderson5618
2 days ago
Sam, your wrong giving these oxygen. Pathetic
2

2 replies

@HP66856
2 days ago
Why? They speak common sense, speak intelligently, and say a lot of things out loud that the sane majority of us are thinking.
5

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
You’re afraid of opinions, that says something about you. If you have better arguments, sir, use them.
4

@marleneverity1253
2 days ago
This is BS

8 replies

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
That’s not an argument.
6

@marleneverity1253
2 days ago
Yes it is there was a holocaust

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago

@ No, saying something is BS without explaining what is, is not an argument.
I can’t legally say that there wasn’t, that says something about it
5

@marleneverity1253
2 days ago
Oh go away your BS

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
@marleneverity1253 Sir. Im Swedish and it’s “you’re”, not your. Do you not know your own language?
Not very educated are ya?
5

@marleneverity1253
2 days ago

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago

@ Figured as much with such ignorant opinions.
4

@charltoncorbett2973
2 days ago
@LordOfSweden it’s woman squawk, no making sense of it.
1

@marleneverity1253
2 days ago
We are all Australian regardless of colour
1

6 replies

@PhilipCunningham1788
2 days ago
The first 16 prime ministers of Australia wouldn’t agree with you
15

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago
Move to Haiti or Liberia, if that’s what you really think.
8

@marleneverity1253
2 days ago
I am entitled to my opinion

@charltoncorbett2973
2 days ago
A dog born in a stable doesn’t make it a horse.
5

@LordOfSweden
2 days ago

@ Sure, but if you don’t think there is a diffference – move to Haiti and Libera. Or maybe Somalia, or why not India?

@pattycrabby9749
2 days ago
So that means everyone in the world is an Australian they just haven’t moved here yet
The whole world is Australia!
R e e e e t a r d
4

@jesslyons4470
3 days ago
Show us on the doll where you were hurt lil babies.. please go to the drains line

1 reply

@1neAdam12
3 days ago
@jesslyons4470

2

@stanadeney5271
3 days ago
Thomas, you can go back to South Africa and Blair migrants built this country think about it Sam I don’t know what I think about the way you conducted this interview
1

6 replies

@Itsmeetc
3 days ago
You are brown
45

@StreetsDisciple01
3 days ago
They don’t disagree that the European migrants helped build the country.
16

@Researchthejoos
3 days ago
Brouwn man detected
19

3 days ago
Europeans and Anglos built this country its our heritage and birthright
30

@Maza675
3 days ago
Pioneers and settlers built the place. The struggles they faced is not even comparable to immigrants coming here now that it is established. Without pioneers and settlers it would not be the first world nation that it is.
16

@hangingwithmatty9465
3 days ago
Lies
2

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

 

The World’s First Anti-Holocaust Convention — Instauration Dec, 1979

An Open Letter to New Jersey’s Governor

Historians or Hoaxers?

House of Orwell

Misha: Surviving with Wolves or …

Bradley Smith’s Smith Report # 1

The Liberation of the Camps: Facts vs. Lies

The Plum Cake

 

 

 

Auschwitz: Myths and Facts

Powers and Principalities XI – Ewen Cameron, MK-Ultra, Holocaust Revisionism — TRANSCRIPT

Tales of the Holohoax – A Historian’s Assessment – Part 1

The Holocaust Lie — Made in America

Probing the Holocaust: The Horror Explained — TRANSCRIPT

Jim Rizoli Interviews Prof Robert Faurisson, Oct 2015 — TRANSCRIPT

Holocaust Eyewitnesses: Is the Testimony Reliable?

Alain Soral – My Homage to Robert Faurisson, Oct 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Inside Auschwitz – You’ve never seen THIS before! — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

Amazion Bans 100s of Holocaust Revisionist Books!

AUSCHWITZ – A Personal Account by Thies Christophersen

Jim Rizoli Interviews Bradley Smith — TRANSCRIPT

London Forum – Alfred Schaefer – Psychological Warfare – TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report Interviews Eric Hunt — TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice Radio – Germar Rudolf – Persecution of Revisionists & Demographic Disaster – Part 1— TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice Radio: Nicholas Kollerstrom — TRANSCRIPT

Red Ice TV – Ingrid Carlqvist – Scandal in Sweden When Ingrid Questions the Unquestionable — TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report with Carolyn Yeager on Johnson vs Anglin debate — TRANSCRIPT

 

 

 

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 1 – Intro – Jun 29, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 2 – Jul 6, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 03 with Paul Fromm – Jul 13, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 04 with Oscar – Jul 20, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 08 with Alfred Schaefer – Aug 17, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 09 with Grace Eki Oyama – Aug 24, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 15 with Jürgen Neumann on Ernst Zündel – Oct 12, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 18 with Jürgen Neumann – Nov 2, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript