Joel Davis: Hello, welcome to the stream. Another show this evening, The Joel and Blair Show. It is the 6th of the 6th! Ominous! 6th of June, 2025. Big show for you tonight. A lot to discuss. A lot’s going on. We’re going to be talking about the N-word. We’re going to be talking about all kinds of things on the show this evening. The question is where to begin.

 

Also, we’re streaming live on Comfies on Comfy Friends X channel. So we lost quite a few viewers when we got banned from X. So it’s nice to be back on X. Nice to have another platform back open to the show. So hello to all the viewers on X. Strap in. Should be a good show this evening.

 

Yeah, it’s pretty fucking cold down here in Melbourne. I got the heater going. I’m pretty cosy. But how you feeling, Blair? You like the cold weather? I actually don’t mind the cold weather. It’s kind of spiritually centreing. But I know you love it because the summer, it just irritates you.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, I’m always irritated by something, but I’m less irritated in the cold. I’m not really sure why. I seem, I don’t know, my neurons fire better in the cold. I think we’re more genetically adapted to the cold, our kin, members of our race. I don’t know, I just seem to be happier when the weather’s a little cooler. I mean, what do you want? You want to lay in bed sweating all night, getting eaten by mosquitoes? It’s not for me, man! I don’t know why people like going to these third world countries for holidays like Thailand and all that shit! Like:

 

“Oh, my God, everything’s so cheap!”

 

Yeah, it’s cheap because it’s a shit hole! And no one actually wants to live there. They make all their money through tourism. It’s too hot there! I don’t really. I’m not interested in that kind of weather. I like to be far away from the equator.

 

But Joel told me, I wasn’t going to wear the beanie because I thought it’s a bit of its a bizarre kind of a beanie. I don’t have any other beanies. This has kind of been handed down to me. I’ve had it for a long time. But Joel said it looked “ornamental”. So I don’t know if that’s good or bad, but you’re gonna have to endure the beanie, guys. Look, sorry if it looks stupid. I’m not taking it off. My head’s cold.

 

02 Trump vs Musk Feud

top

 

Joel Davis: Hold frame! Don’t concede frame like that, don’t concede frame like that.

 

But, yeah, no, I got the beanie on to, because I just want to be cosy, feel cosy. But yeah, so let’s get into it.

 

I mean, there’s a lot to break down. Today, all the news breaking, waking up this morning, Australian time, and all the news breaking of Elon Musk and Donald Trump falling out. That’s kind of interesting. Like, I wasn’t expecting to cover that on the show tonight. Kind of you could see that brewing for a while, but I wasn’t expecting it to blow up like that. I think maybe we will kind of analyse that, but maybe later in the show.

 

03 Clip of NSN Rally in Melbourne – Ban Niggers Not Machetes

top

 

But first there was a kind of provocative rally. I don’t know who did it. These guys, they all dress in black and so on. I don’t really know who they are, but it was kind of interesting. They had an interesting little banner drop, kind of banner action the other day. They put out a video. So maybe we could play the video and then. Yeah, then we could analyse it.

 

[Start of clip]

 

9 news: Bouquets of flowers marking another victim of Victoria’s machete crisis. Police say up to 10 young men of African appearance are, still on the run. A teenage boy has escaped. Injuries unleashed.

All seven people allegedly involved in that violent machete brawl at Melbourne’s Northland Shopping Centre have now been arrested. That’s good news. So Andrew McCormack is in Melbourne, Maca. It comes as the state’s landmark machete ban comes into effect today.

Anita Allan (Vic State Premier): These knives are dangerous weapons. They have no place on our streets anywhere! And that is why I will introduce as many laws to get these dangerous knives off the streets.

NSN members: Chanting (with “Ban Niggers Not Machetes” banner), White man! Fight back! White man! Fight back! White man! Fight back!

7 News: Police are investigating after a mob of masked militants gathered at Northland Shopping Centre in the early hours of this morning.

[End of clip]

 

Blair Cottrell: Funny how we didn’t have much of a problem with knife crime in Australia until the government filled the country full of Africans. [chuckling] But it’s the knives that are the problem, not the people wielding them! Not the people with sub 70 IQs that don’t really understand how to deal with conflicts or get what they want through any other method than by using a knife. That’s not the problem! It’s the knives themselves! Can you believe these people? I don’t know. Joel, what do you think?

 

[05:37]

 

04 Tactical Use of the N-Word, Pros and Cons

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean this it was interesting to watch the reaction to this, because by the standards of NSN rallies, this one was pretty tame. But just because there was a tactical N-word on the banner, it got a massive response online. Just from my clicking around on TikTok and Instagram and Twitter and so on. It accumulated more views. Like the short phone clip video of the action. It accumulated more views than Australia has people. I counted at least 30 million views. Not to mention it was broadcast on the news. And not to mention whoever else uploaded it or reacted to it, I didn’t see.

 

So this went very viral! Like this got a lot of attention online. And it got a lot of attention in not in, not with, not necessarily the most politically engaged audiences, because it was posted by mainstream media accounts or other just kind of random news accounts and so on.

 

So initially it was posted on Twitter. It was posted by people connected to the so-called dissident Right. And you know, a lot of people liked it, obviously.

 

But also it drew a lot of criticism from people who said:

 

“Oh this just associates our worldview with incivility and with vulgarity. And this is just going to turn people off. And normal people they’re willing to have an adult conversation about immigration and crime and even like race and crime, but not when you go dropping the N-word.”

 

But then I started reading the comment sections on Instagram and TikTok and so on, and the comment sections were dominated by seemingly normal people, loving it! And saying, “there’s nothing wrong here”. They were very supportive. They were saying:

 

“How come White people can’t stand up for ourselves? That’s a double standard, blah, blah blah.”

 

Basically siding with the demonstration. There wasn’t too much discussion of “are these people feds?” There wasn’t all this discussion of “is the N-word offensive?”. Now obviously Leftists and non-Whites in particular, non-Whites didn’t like the rally and reacted negatively towards it. But the rally’s not for them. It wasn’t designed to appeal to them. The people that it was designed to appeal to, seemingly liked it.

 

And I think what we need to kind of come to terms with is the fact that this so-called “normie” out there that, is willing to have a grown up conversation about race, but gets turned off if you ever mention Hitler or use a racial slur or something. This person doesn’t actually exist! It’s a totally contrived concept drummed up by over politicised conservatives.

 

Blair Cottrell: Really though? I think they exist in the form of the Boomer. Not all the time, but some older generation people, they close down as soon as you mention Hitler, as soon as you start to become vulgar with terminology that you’re using regarding race. I know Boomers that will shut off instantly with that kind of stuff. So they do exist, I think.

 

Joel Davis: I think the people that shut off with that kind of stuff, they’re also not willing to, they’re shutting off in general, like they’re shutting off towards, … I don’t think people that are really open to a pro-White, like a kind of racist, racialist perspective. I don’t think that there’s a lot of people like that that are also super offended by the N-word or something. I think if you’re offended by the N-word, it’s because you’re actually offended by racism in general, no matter how clean it’s presented to you.

 

And in fact, if you do, what you saw here was, if the banner said “ban blacks not machetes” or “ban Africans not machetes” or something like that, it would have got some traction, but nowhere near as much. It would have been nowhere near as provocative to I think mass audiences. And it wouldn’t have driven a conversation, because what it did is it created this dichotomy in people’s minds of:

 

“How come the system, how come the mainstream media is more concerned about naughty words then they’re concerned about knife crime? They’re concerned about people getting slashed up with machetes, that they’re concerned about you know, incompatible, you know, races being brought into our country en masse.”

 

I’ll just bring Blair back on. Dropped off there as, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Sorry to interrupt. I have this like this hectic new mouse that I bought and it’s got all these buttons on the side and apparently one of those buttons closes the tab that I’ve currently accessed.

 

So I have to be careful not to, or maybe I can programme it so that doesn’t happen. I’ll figure it out. Sorry, please continue.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so what I was saying was is that the use of the N-word, not only did it, basically get more attention as a result, but it also created this dichotomy between how come the system and the mainstream media is more concerned with mean words or offensive speech, than they are with you know, savage violence. And also the ridiculousness of government policy that no one can tell it like it is like machetes don’t produce violent crime you know, violent criminals produce violent crime! And there’s obviously a massive difference, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Africans statistically produce more violent crime as well. Like that is just a statistic fact!

 

05 Why the Fuck Are There Africans in Australia!

top

 

Joel Davis: And why the fuck are there Africans in Australia! Like indeed. The argument for immigration is usually these people come in, they contribute to our society, they work hard, they become doctors, they become, … Africans are not coming in and contributing to our society. They’re bringing with them incredible amounts of crime. These people are coming from war torn backwards countries. They’re savage races. They’re not compatible with Western civilisation.

 

You know, obviously we push back against the arguments made for you know, the benefits of, the so-called benefits, of like Asian immigration or something, but at least they have some kind of argument if you’re looking just through the prism of economics and you don’t think about certain things.

 

But with the African migrants it’s basically impossible to really see what the benefit, supposedly is, of these people coming into our country.

 

[12:15]

 

 

06 Whites Created the Problems in the Rest of the World Through Our Expansionism and Colonialism?

top

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s not on the basis of them being any benefit to our country that they’re brought into the country though. It’s on the basis of I think two things. Human equality, the idea that everyone can be equal if they just experience the same kind of social, opportunities, situation.

 

And also the fact that Africa or African people only live in extreme poverty and experience war conflicts as a result of White colonialism!

 

And so they’re not brought into the country on the basis of its beneficial to us or being beneficial to us, it’s equality, and White people must pay for what they’ve done! So how do we get around that? How do you get around those arguments in the conversation with the standard person when someone brings that up, what’s a nice effective, quick way to respond to that, to shut them down, do you think?

 

Joel Davis: Oh, I think it’s quite simple. Like, number one we are first and foremost responsible to our own people and to ourselves before we have to like, worry about the problems of the rest of the world. Like, it’s not our responsibility to say, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But we created the problems in the rest of the world through our expansionism and colonialism. It’s all our fault!

 

And so now we have the, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s just bullshit!

 

In sub-Saharan Africa they hadn’t even invented the wheel yet when the White man showed up. These people were living in a totally savage, weren’t they?

 

Blair Cottrell: Weren’t the Egyptians black? [chuckling] That’s what some of them think. I’ve seen that online the, …

 

Joel Davis: The pharaoh Akhenaten. Based upon the DNA evidence, do you know which population is most genetically similar to Akhenaten, Blair, in the world today?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve heard. But remind me, it’s like redheads, isn’t it? Like Germans and redheads.

 

Joel Davis: Well, specifically the Scottish. The Scottish people are the most genetically similar, followed by the Irish.

 

Blair Cottrell: Wow! So there you go.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we waz. We waz [kangz].

 

07 How Irish Are You? Joel and Blair’s Ancestry

top

 

Blair Cottrell: How Irish are you? I think I’m a quarter Irish.

 

Joel Davis: Not that much. I got Ulster Scott in me, but they were from what’s called Northern Irish, but they’re not Irish, they’re Scottish. I’m more Scottish than anything other than English. Like a 50, 50 Scottish English blend. I used to think that there was more Irish in my ancestry because members of my family couldn’t distinguish correctly between northern and southern Irish. And then when I looked into it myself, I verified that.

 

But you can tell by the way I look as well. I think I got more of that look. I don’t have a very Irish look.

 

Blair Cottrell: I also thought I also thought I had more Irish in me than I do, since members of my family couldn’t distinguish between crime and peaceful resolution to conflict! [chuckling] But no, like, we go, okay. The Cottrells do all right. Mostly farmers and butchers is the history of my family. So honest people, hard working, honest people. I’m proud to come from lineage like that.

 

Joel Davis: Were you able to trace yourself back to any convicts?

 

Blair Cottrell: No. I haven’t really looked into it though, to be honest. I haven’t looked into it. My grandmother on my father’s side says that her line goes back to German and she had some evidence of that. I can’t remember what it was. But the name Cottrell often pronounced Cotrel, is from an old Frankish tribe, I think, and first appeared in England during the Norman conquests sometime during the 11th century or after that. So there’s all sorts of European stock from various different places there. English, possibly French, possibly German. We’re just not really sure.

 

08 DNA Labs Selling Your Data to Interested Parties

top

 

So, yeah, it’s all a bit grey. I don’t really go for that DNA testing type stuff. Because I have a friend who knows someone who actually got charged with an offence, a crime, as a result of someone in his family giving their DNA to one of those DNA testing websites, indicating that the testing websites, the people you send the DNA to, they sell your DNA to interested parties, state police, you know, someone growing something in a lab, perhaps. You don’t know what’s happening with your DNA when you hand it into those agencies.

 

So I haven’t done that for that reason. It might be a bit paranoid. Maybe it’s harmless. It’s up to you can do whatever you want, but I don’t really want to spit in a cup and send it through to DNA testing. What about you? Have you done any lineage?

 

09 History of the Name Davis

top

 

Joel Davis: No, I haven’t done the DNA testing, really, going off, tracing lineage. But my grandparents were pretty good at tracing lineage. So we know most of it back most generations. Yeah, people in the comments are saying Davis is Welsh, A, Welsh name. That’s true.

 

But the thing is that when the convention to develop last names came in Britain, which only happened after the Norman Conquest, so that was 1066, and it was brought in through phases in Britain up until about the 13th century, before everyone had a formal last name there or thereabouts.

 

A lot of people who became Davises was just simply because they were the son of David. You know, there was some guy called David who was their dad or their granddad or something. So that actually happened in Scotland and in England as well as in Wales. It wasn’t only in Wales where that happened, which is why, if you look at the commonality of the surname Davis, it’s more common in Britain. Oh, sorry, in England than it is in Wales. And it’s actually even more common in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and America than it is in Britain. And it’s especially common in America.

 

So obviously the Davises, we had a propensity to move when the time came to start settling the new World. So I think it’s like the seventh most common last name in America among American Whites.

 

[18:37]

 

Blair Cottrell: When I went to England, I showed you, I went to one of the oldest cathedrals in England in Winchester, which was the original capital of England before London. I don’t know if it was the official capital, but it was the centre of trade before London became the official capital. And in this cathedral there was like an old book with all of these servicemen, men who had died in service of the Crown. I think it was mostly from the First World War, but when you turned to the page D, DA, there was like 25 or 30 Davises. I noticed more Davises died for England than almost any other surname I could find in the book actually.

 

So, yeah, very popular surname from England.

 

10 Davises in the US Had Slaves Resulting in Niggers Having the Name!

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s a very common name. And yeah, famous Davises include Jefferson Davis, who was the president of the Confederacy of the Confederate States of America.

 

So yeah, we owned a lot of slaves unfortunately in the South. And that has resulted in a lot of niggers. It’s unfortunate for this reason, because we owned a lot of slaves and that has resulted in a lot of niggers in America taking on the Davis name. Why the fuck did we allow blacks to take on the last names of their slave owners? I mean that was. It’s gross! You like watch like the NFL and it’s like “Javante Davis” or some shit! And it’s like, for fuck’s sake! Why do they have our names?

 

Blair Cottrell: But the relationship between families and their slaves I think often was, you know there was relative friendship happening there.

 

And I think both the family and the slaves started really appreciating each other and maybe even the family just became a little too kind to the slaves and that’s how they ended up with the surnames. Or maybe they just kind of adopted those surnames. The slaves, when they were told to write down their name whenever they were becoming, you know, free or legitimate citizens because they couldn’t think of another name to adopt. There’s probably a multitude of reasons.

 

But I know that being a slave in old America didn’t always mean that you were mistreated in any significant way. I mean, sometimes it probably did, but it was sometimes it was just a better alternative to living in the African Wilderness. Right?

 

11 Whites, Jews, Blacks and the Slave Trade

top

 

Joel Davis: One must also remember that we didn’t go around we as in White and I guess a lot of jews were involved in the slave trade, obviously. But we weren’t going around like capturing random wild niggers in the bush of Africa or something. They enslaved their own people and then sold them to us. Right? So, like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, they didn’t sell them directly to us. They sold them to the jewish merchants who owned the slave ships, who then sold them to us.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! So it’s their shame. Like, if we enslaved our own people and then sold them to niggers that would be our shame. It wouldn’t be their shame.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but we would have the intelligence to take responsibility for it. [chuckling] There’s the difference. Right?

 

12 Instagram and the Very Positive Response to the Ban Niggers Not Machetes Action

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But let me show you guys this.

 

So, I was on, scrolling around. I have a burner Instagram account, which I don’t really use Instagram, I just have a burner account for when people send me shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: Really? You should use Instagram more. You strike me as a real Instagram kind of guy. Not really!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, maybe I should because I’m banned from everything else, maybe I should give Instagram a go. So there’s this account.

 

Blair Cottrell: Apparently, before you continue. Instagram is popping off at the moment, I’ve heard like all the memes. Like, there’s a lot more free speech allowed on there than there was before. I think Zuckerberg’s worried about being cut out of the social media capital because I’ve heard reports that it’s actually pretty based. But I don’t know how the true that is in practice. I’ll have to jump on and use it a bit more myself and find out.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I heard that a lot of nationalist accounts who were doing well on Instagram from Europe and from America, were all recently banned in a big ban wave. And they’ve nipped that slightly in the bud recently, but, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I haven’t heard about that, so maybe I’m wrong.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we should definitely probably try and make hay while the sun shines on Instagram while we’re banned from X.

 

So this is like just some random Instagram that’s got like less than 2,000 followers. Quick World. Never heard of this before. They just post random news clips, right? And then I was scrolling through and the news clips, they get like 2,000, 3,000 views, if that they posted the clip of the Ban Niggers Not Machetes banner [by NSN] action. 1.9 million views!

 

And then the comments, I was scrolling through every single comment. You know how they show like the top comments that get a lot of likes at the top.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Every single comment was positive! Look at some of these:

 

“A White man so-called hateful rally is 1 million percent more peaceful than a BLM rally. Hahaha!”

 

“So for years we get black riots with participants burning the nation’s flag, screaming black pride, and often committing acts of violence targeting Whites. But this is a disturbing display of pure hate hatred?”

 

This is how normal people are reacting. Right. I got more here, let me pull more up.

 

“I mean, they’re not wrong. No, they’re 100% correct this time. You conveniently left out the fact that they were protesting because four African teenagers threatened a 15 year old boy with a machete. Maybe give all the people the facts before making a biassed post!”

 

You know, it just goes on and on, these kinds of comments. It was incredible to see because I thought, okay, this rally is pretty controversial. I’m sure it, some people will love it, but it will it’s pretty provocative. I was surprised at how supportive a lot of these reactions were, scrolling through social media.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, me too.

 

Joel Davis: At the beginning you were telling me this is just going to upset normies and no one’s going to like this kind of thing. Maybe you don’t understand normies? Maybe normies are actually more based than you first realised?

 

[24:46]

 

 

13 Discussion on the Effective Use of the N-Word and Media Response

top

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s not just that, but I think people don’t always understand the purpose behind it. I mean, correct me if I’m wrong because it wasn’t my idea, but it’s sort of a tactical thing when you drop the N-word like that in a public way. Because it’s an effort, I suppose, to force government officials to react to what you’re doing and thereby demonstrate that they’re more offended, or taking the N-word more seriously than they are violent knife crime. It’s like it’s worse to hold up a banner with that word written on it apparently, than it is to assault someone with a machete in a public shopping centre in broad daylight in front of families and so forth.

 

It’s like that banner has essentially caused more outrage in the political and media class than the knife crime itself. Which is one of the reasons that you use that phrase. Right? You put that phrase on the banner to demonstrate for the public. Because the public don’t like that they don’t like it when there’s an obvious problem that isn’t being addressed for ideological reasons. And that’s what gets people on side. That’s Why I think the public is on your side, regardless of the slur. Because there’s obviously ideological problems. There’s a double standard being employed here.

 

Joel Davis: And that’s why it was a tactical use. Because if there’s a lot of situations where it’s a bit much maybe to drop the N-word, right? But sometimes it’s not a bit much. Sometimes it’s manifestly appropriate. And this is a situation where it is because when you’re talking about blacks running around with machetes, slicing people up in shopping malls, that’s nigger behaviour! What could be more nigger behaviour than that? That’s the exact reason why we have a slur like that for these people. So you know, it makes sense to drop a word like that.

 

And then you see a reaction where Leftists, non-Whites, who have contempt for White people, the system, all these people show so much concern about the use of a word on a banner at 3 o’ clock in the morning when no one got hurt, no one attacked anyone. It was just a video of guys holding a banner at the front of a shopping centre at 3 AM. This apparently is the most horrible thing ever! It’s so horrible! It puts everything in perspective for a lot of people. Like, hey, wait a second. And now you’ve got a sympathetic audience, a sympathetic receptacle for your N-word. Now your N-word can have a lot of potency and power because it really radicalises the conversation, enforces a conversation that otherwise wouldn’t be happening.

 

I mean, look at this. This is Daily Mail, Australia’s TikTok, right? I took this screenshot yesterday. I’m sure it has more views now. You see here I was scrolling through some of the TikToks get a lot of views. Like one here’s got half a million views. This one, 300 something thousand, 50,000.

 

 

Look at the one of the rally, though:

 

“Sickening scenes in Melbourne as White supremacists descend on Shopping Centre.”

 

7.1 million views! Right? I looked on the metrics on The Noticer. It was the biggest post the notice has made you know, this month, most traction and they’re putting out news every day. Comfy Friend posted, a clip of it. It was like one of the most viral things he’s posted. You know, it got incredible amounts of traction. I don’t think he’s got anything more viral than that all year. Why is it so interesting to people? If it’s bad activism obviously it’s good activism.

 

So that’s the thing. It’s like, apparently it’s the rule:

 

“Oh, you can’t use language like that!”

 

But, maybe it’s about trying to find the appropriate way to use language like that. Like controversy is a weapon. And now we’ve forced all of these the politicians to not only talk about the issue but also, very explicitly racialise the issue and show how, the anti-racist ideology is preventing anyone from stating the obvious and trying to come up with the only obvious solution, which is it doesn’t matter whether you ban machetes. If you’ve got a bunch of Sudanese refugees living in your city, they’re going to be engaging in violent crimes. You know, home invasions are happening every other day.

 

14 Sudanese in Pakenham Attacking White High School Kids at Party

top

 

The same night that this happened, by the way, there were a bunch of Sudanese in Pakenham, which is in southeastern Melbourne. They jumped the back fence into some some high school kids party and started bashing, filming themselves by the way, bashing all the White kids, saying:

 

“Oh, Sudanese things, just Sudanese things!”

 

And they’re like beating them up and taking their shoes, taking their phone, taking their wallet and they’re posting it online like:

 

“Haha, how funny is this? We’re just bashing White kids and taking all their shit!”

 

[29:34]

 

Blair Cottrell: What area was this in Pakenham?

 

Joel Davis: Packenham.

 

Blair Cottrell: Probably the White kids are like significantly outnumbered in Pakenham, I could imagine. Pakenham is a suburb in southeastern Melbourne, like inland suburb that is just notorious for being inundated with immigrants. A lot of immigrants, a lot of black immigrants, Indians. It’s just somewhere that most Australians don’t want to go anymore.

 

15 Machete Fight at Northland Shopping Centre

top

 

Joel Davis: Mm. But like in Melbourne you, home invasions are through the roof! Every single crime metric is through the roof! And every other day there’s some new story of blacks having a machete fight or running through someone’s house. And this machete fight, we talked about it last week at Northland Shopping Centre. The only reason that it was brought to a heel was because of a random White pedestrian, White shoppers.

 

Blair Cottrell: A random White guy. And isn’t that symbolic of the real solution to this entire problem, is that’s that standalone working class White male. The White male is the only real effective solution to this problem. The White male that is no longer afraid to just stand up and provide that physical, immediate solution. Without that guy willing to do that, then there isn’t any sort of effective solution. There’s just bureaucracy and excuses. So I found that really symbolic.

 

16 Magistrates in Victoria Are Being Trained in Diversity and Inclusion to Go Easy on Immigrants

top

 

Joel Davis: That’s the thing as well sthe only reason that we can’t solve this problem is because White guys don’t want to get thrown in jail. Because if we were to do something serious about this problem, the system would come down hard on us.

 

Meanwhile, the story was out in the Noticer earlier this year. It has come out in other mainstream outlets. It has come out that the magistrates in Melbourne or in Victoria are being trained by diversity and inclusion, whatever types, to make sure that they lower the sentencing against refugees immigrants and so on, to prevent them from getting deported when they commit violent crimes.

 

Blair Cottrell: So these magistrates would be smarter to realise, …

 

Joel Davis: These blacks are doing, like, home invasions, putting machetes to the throats of innocent families at 2 o’ clock in the morning, taking their car keys and taking their TV and their laptops, whatever. And the magistrates are being trained not to deport them, not to give them a jail sentence longer than one year, which would trigger them getting deported.

 

So then basically, they all know that even if they get caught, it’s a small holiday in prison at worst. So they’ve got no disincentive not to keep behaving like this. They know that they can just take the piss. Whereas if we rose up against them and put them in their place, they’d throw the book at us! Like, forget about it.

 

Not only are the police, and I don’t necessarily blame the police for this because it’s you know, their hands are tied. But the system! Not only is the system not enforcing the law correctly in order to deal with the problem, bringing them in the first place, which there’s no reason to bring them in, that makes any sense.

 

Secondly, not enforcing the law properly so that they basically feel emboldened to behave like this. Third, the they will actively destroy the lives and punish harshly anyone in the community who tries to put a stop to it ourselves.

 

And so they’ve created the problem, at all three levels.

 

Blair Cottrell: You think if you’re a magistrate, you’d be smart enough to realise that you’re being taken for a ride when you’re being put through a diversity and inclusion brainwashing process. You know, magistrates aren’t stupid people. You know, they’ve been in law quite a while. They’ve well I can only assume they’re not stupid people, but maybe they’re just so keen on keeping their position, keeping their their job as a magistrate that they’ll do whatever they have to do.

 

That’s the problem as well, isn’t it? It’s money, money, cowardice and the comfort of a minister’s chair or something like that.

 

17 The Problem of Anti-Racism Being Championed by Whites

top

 

But you were saying earlier, you were remarking on being surprised by how much support you were mustering up from regular people in response to a banner which would in times hitherto have just been considered vulgar and perhaps would actually just cause public uproar. And so isn’t that interesting though how The Times are changing and I think people are just angry. They’re angry enough to not even care about that word. They’re angry enough to support whoever is standing up against this, regardless of what kind of language they’re using, because people just want to see results. And that’s notable because the primary force or the sort of people who champion anti-racism are White people. White people are the reason anti-racism exists! Without naive, obsequious White people who are obsessed with feeling good about themselves, we wouldn’t have anti-racism.

 

But now we’re seeing this phenomena where many White people are sick of that. Many White people are turning their backs on anti-racism because they’re just interested in seeing results. If they have to be racist in order to see those results, so be it. They don’t care. And that’s exciting man. I’m excited to see where that future leads.

 

[35:11]

 

 

18 Upcoming Communist Anti-Nazi Rally at Northland Shopping Centre

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah it’s going to be interesting too because tomorrow, there’s some follow up stories about this shopping centre in Preston, in North Melbourne called Northland. Number one there’s going to be a communist organised rally tomorrow at the shops. An anti-Nazi rally because we held up a banner that said nigger on it. I wasn’t there, of course I wasn’t there! But, you know, members of the Org, members of the NSN allegedly were there.

 

And so they’re going to have an anti-Nazi rally. That’s going to be interesting. I wonder if that’s going to make the news. What kind of freaks are going to show up to that? I saw they said “trans folk and refugees welcome”. So I don’t know why the trannies are getting lumped in that.

 

[Image: The anti-Nazi Rally that took place on Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at Northland shopping centre Preston, Melbourne.]

 

Blair Cottrell: They’ll be destroyed. They’ll be destroyed! They’ll be de-legitimized by their own optics. So let them do it.

 

19 Meat Cleavers Being Carried as a Weapon

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, I hope we get some footage because it sounds like an absolute freak show!

 

And then also yesterday we had a story where someone was arrested at Northlands because they were wielding a meat cleaver as a weapon.

 

So the machete ban doesn’t seem to be going too well. They’re just moving on to meat cleavers now. So I wonder if they’re going to ban meat cleavers? I don’t know what the butchers are going to do. Say goodbye to your Scotch fillets because they won’t be able to chop them up anymore. Going to have to just buy the whole cow, basically, and just kind of gnaw it, because meat cleavers are probably going to be made illegal next.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s at the discretion of police when they bring in a ban like this. Like, if police see you carrying a meat cleaver on public transport obviously they’re going to take that from you. But if you’re using a meat cleaver as a butcher, I think you’re going to be okay. I know that you’re making a joke. Maybe I’m just being autistic. But yeah.

 

20 Machetes Useful When Going on Bushwalks

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I am making a joke, but that was already the case about machetes. But apparently they’ve got to ban them, so you can’t buy a machete at Bunnings [similar to Home Depot]. Say you want to go on a bushwalk a machete is very useful if you’re going off the beaten track to, basically slice your way through vegetation and so on. Because I don’t know if you guys have ever been on a bushwalk at home, or a forest walk or whatever you Americans call it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Walk through the woods.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. When you get off the path, and you’re kind of having to kind of crawl your way through shrubs and so on it becomes exhausting. Your arms get all sliced up. Having a machete just to hack through it makes your life so much easier.

 

So now we can no longer hack through vegetation without a special licence. I wonder how you get your machete licence? I don’t even know even how it works.

 

Blair Cottrell: You can’t even walk through a lot of bushland in Australia at all anymore. There’s this weird situation going on where certain lands and public parks. I don’t know what they’re called. They’re like National Parks. I think they’re called, which means they’re like public property, but they’re being closed off due to some Aboriginal heritage or Land Rights Act.

 

And apparently there’s dozens of National Parks all across the country that the government’s closed access to. And some of them are major tourist attractions. So people come to this country to walk through certain regions and see various landscapes and they can’t do it because of Aboriginal rights or something like that. But that’s a different subject to explore entirely. I saw this in a video recently. But I think there might be something deeper going on there. Perhaps the government is selling that land to private enterprise for some specific purpose. I don’t know. But I’ve got to look into it. If anyone knows anything about that, send me some details because I’m interested.

 

21 Calling Whites ‘Cum Skins’ as a Slur

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I see that there’s some seething! I don’t know if they’re a nigger, or a pajeet, but something like that, in the comments. I see the moderators have taken them out, but he called us “come skins”. I find that to be an interesting insult. Apparently this is an anti-White insult. Because of course we call them shit skins. I’d much rather be the come skin than the shit skin because you are refuse! But we’re the seed of life, you know. We’re the seed of life. So of all the kind of bodily fluids to identify with, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s virtually impossible to be offended by a racial slur if you’re White. [chuckling] Because it’s like being White is, it’s great to be White! It’s not a problem. Point it out in any way that you think is derogatory. And it’s just funny to us. [chuckling] You can’t get offended by racial slurs unless you don’t like yourself. Because someone’s pointing out your race to you and you’re trying to deny and cope with your own racial identity that you don’t like. And so you’re offended because someone’s pointing out a reality that you’re trying not to acknowledge, Right? So all you got to do is like yourself and suddenly racism is funny.

 

22 Blacks Are ‘Offended’ by ‘Nigger’ Because It Gives Them Power

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, that’s a thing with blacks too. Like if blacks, blacks already kind of 50% owned the word nigger because they turned it into like cool. You know, they got it in like rap music and they’re like, “what’s up my nigger?” And so on. And all it is like Latin for black etymologically. Like it’s nothing to even be offended by if they would just chill with everyone calling them niggers too, and like:

 

“Oh, yeah, I’m a, you’re a White guy, or whatever.”

 

It would have no potency, would have zero potency. It’s only got potency because they’re offended by it. Now they also pretend to be offended by it because it gives them power. They get to be a victim and it authorises them to commit acts of violence and aggression towards Whites.

 

And so they’ve charged it for their own hate, for the purposes of their own hatred. That’s very important to remember. The only reason why blacks get offended by the word is because they hate White people. And they want to be able to develop some kind of excuse by creating this kind of fake moral conundrum. They want to be able to create a way, a pretext, to express their racial hatred.

 

[41:04]

 

23 Average Aussies Males Don’t Like People Claiming to Be ‘Offended’

top

 

Blair Cottrell: They still want to be accepted by us as well. It’s like they don’t like us, but they also want to be treated as equals at the same time. So I don’t know what’s going on there. It’s kind of something to do with an inferiority complex, I think. But I don’t know. All I know, though, is if you’re offended by something, if you’re getting worked up about something, Australians, they’re going to keep doing whatever it is that offends you. They’re going to keep developing that line, they’re going to keep poking the bear and they’re gonna take the piss any way they can.

 

So this is not the kind of place where in social situations, being offended doesn’t really hold any weight down here in Australia. The government tries hard to make it a thing and the media’s on board, obviously.

 

But I think one of the reasons the standard working class Australian tends to still have pretty based perspectives is because it’s when you’re offended down here, it doesn’t mean anything. In a typical social situation, people just laugh at you. That’s a good thing!

 

24 They’re Trying to Make Being an Aussie ‘Bloke’ Illegal

top

 

Joel Davis: That’s how it works in a normal Australian friend group. Like, if you get offended by something, everyone will keep bullying you until you realise that you’re getting bullied because you’re offended.

 

Like if you just bantered back, then you wouldn’t be targeted. Yeah, it’s just until you realise that you’re making yourself a “victim” and then that produces a social space free of “soft cuntism”, basically, as Jacob Hersant calls it. That’s normal Australian, you know, particularly male relations.

 

And yeah, obviously they’re trying to make being a bloke illegal. Australia used to be all about being a bloke. It used to be about, drive a V8, get on the piss, do doies [donuts], send it, have a farm, you know, say what you want, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe an occasional race riot on the beach!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And they’re trying to make being Australian illegal. That’s what they’re trying to do. Because a bunch of faggot communists and seething ingrates in charge.

 

25 a Conspiracy to Make Aussies into a Mongrel Slave Race

top

 

Blair Cottrell: You can’t bully Aussies, can you? You can’t turn Australians into slaves, into a slave class. That’s why they’re trying to get rid of us. They want to replace us with a more manageable population they can bully, push around, force them to live in little McMansions and cubicles, force them to work 16 hours a day. You can’t do that to Aussies! They’re not going to play that game. And that’s what it all comes down to I think it’s about replacing us with a slave race, with a mongrel slave race. And that conspiracy, I think, is the most outstanding one! It’s the one that’s at the centre of all other conspiracies.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But also a lot of the people who want to convert us into a slave race are themselves already members of it. They’re trying to drag us down to their level. That’s the other thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Misery loves company, bro! Misery loves company!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. That’s all these freaks that are going to show up to the shops tomorrow to do their anti-Nazi protest. They’re basically the dregs of society that want to drag everyone down to their level.

 

26 the Miserable Mentality of Leftist Freaks

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you imagine the sort of things people like that talk about in private? Can you imagine the threshold of conversations like you wouldn’t be able to say anything that you’re actually thinking. All you’d be able to do is like, give shit to Nazis and talk about what a good person you are for standing up for minorities. You know, talk about the Arab style scarf that you just got given by Socialist Alternative rally on the weekend. What a boring shit life! [chuckling] It’s like, I can’t even visualise it, man! I don’t. Sorry for doing it to you. If you’re thinking about it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, they. It’s basically just a misery convention where they all get together and talk about how victimised they are and how all the different mental illnesses they have and you know, no one’s allowed to make any jokes that offend anyone. They just morally police each other all the time. It seems horrible.

 

When I was younger, I did associate with people who are ideologically Leftist in certain situations. And I never lasted long because I just offended them because I can’t help myself, I’m me! I’m an edge lord, you know, naturally. So it never worked out. But which is good. I mean, that’s obviously just natural. I don’t belong with them.

 

27 Blair’s Encounter as a Teenager at a Marxist Convention with Fat Lesbians

top

 

Blair Cottrell: So I found, I found them first as well. Like I’ve told the story a couple of times. Went to a Marxist convention when I was 18 because they were some of the first posters I saw. The posters they used to spread around Melbourne had a slogan on them saying “ideas to challenge the system”. You know, I was an edgy teenager. So, yeah:

 

“I don’t like the system. Let’s go meet these people and see what they’re talking about. No, man, not my clan at all!”

 

Wasn’t a single other working class person there. It was just all of these very overweight lesbian looking women glaring at me as though I was the enemy. And I’m like:

 

“Hey, I’m just here because we don’t like the system, right? Or hang on, these people kind of are the system. These are the exact, this is our problem right here. I’m thinking.”

 

So, [chuckling] yeah, it’s like a fake resistance. I determined it was kind of like a fake resistance that exists to possibly catch people like me and steer them in the wrong direction to essentially neutralise someone who could potentially join a revolutionary, a real revolutionary force.

 

[46:36]

 

28 Ted Kaczynski Summed up Leftism Pretty Well

top

 

Joel Davis: I think Ted Kaczynski summed up Leftism pretty well. His assessment is that:

 

“Leftists are people who are upset with the system or not embodying its own values purely enough. So they’re not revolutionaries. They don’t oppose the values of the system. They support the system so much that they’re upset with the system for not being more systemy than it actually is!”

 

So like that’s what they’re all saying. They’re like:

 

“Oh, look at the White privilege of these men standing in balaclavas at 3 AM! How come they weren’t arrested?”

 

They, probably weren’t arrested because it’s impossible to tell who the fuck they are because they’re covering up their identity because the anti-White system would arrest them and try to throw them in prison otherwise!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but what the Leftists want is for like 30 likely suspects to be rounded up at random and, executed out in the Woods for social justice! Maybe they’d be happy with that, but probably that still complain that it didn’t happen fast enough. [chuckling] I don’t know, man!

 

I mean, that’s what’s, that’s how crazy things can get though. Like, history proves that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but that’s what they are.

 

I mean, these Leftists, they’re totally, entirely dependent upon the system as individuals. They they’re on all kinds of like, medications. A lot of them are on disability benefits or Centerlink. You know, these people are not independent people that don’t need like a large bureaucracy to prop up their lives. You know, they need to go and see like mental health professionals and they need all this support! Right. I think they advocate for, is making everyone feel included and supported and having more government programmes to take care of everyone. They call themselves “anarchists”. It’s the most un-Anarchistic position you could possibly have! They can’t have enough government. They want to turn everything into a democracy. They want everything in society to be this big bureaucratic voting committee procedure where, that’s their ideal. They don’t want to be left alone.

 

29 Marcus Follin Said That ‘Dysgenics is the Only Reason Leftism Still Exists’.

top

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d have more empathy for them if they weren’t so self contradictory, if they weren’t literally representing the opposite of what they claim to represent. It’s wild that people can come to that manner of existence.

 

But look, in summary, Marcus Follin [aka the Golden One] said that:

 

“Dysgenics is the only reason Leftism still exists.”

 

It’s just dysgenic. It’s bad genetics, bad blood, too much drugs, too much of that victim psychology that comes along with just being genetically deficient. And like, you can’t really get past that summary. I don’t think that’s a good summary. Wraps it all up.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah! Fair enough. Is there anything else to say about this particular subject? I mean everyone knows, everyone who’s an Australian at the very least knows about the problems with African crime. There’s not much point going over it again. I mean, it’s important to reiterate it to the public.

 

But you know, we all know about it and we cover it on the show all the time.

 

But yeah, it was interesting to see. I think the, it’s more the reaction to the banner and how it was received by different groups of people that I found more interesting to be honest than anything else.

 

30 A Non-White Reaction to the Ban Niggers Not Machetes Video

top

 

Blair Cottrell: I wanted to remark on a reaction video I saw that, a woman filmed. The woman was not White.

 

Joel Davis: Do you have it? I can play it.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, I don’t. I saw it in some chat on Telegram and I’m in so many different chats that people add me to, I can’t remember which one it was. But I remember some of what she said. She was clearly very upset, wasn’t White by anyone’s standards. I don’t know what she was though. She kind of looked maybe slightly African and, I don’t even know. But she was quite wide eyed in the video here and there, like kind of crazy eyed! But there was something she said I found interesting. She demanded that:

 

“Other people need to call this out!”

 

Sure, she said the police should arrest these guys and investigate and blah blah, blah. But she said:

 

“Other people must call this out!”

 

And I thought, isn’t that peculiar? Whenever someone who’s not White feels discriminated against, targeted by racism, they appeal to other White people to come to their aid. It’s like they feel like they can’t even help themselves. They require the White champions of anti-racism to storm in and save the day! And it brings me back to what I was saying before. What happens when those anti-racists no longer exist within the White community? What happens when White people actually start to become ethnically conscious and realise they’re just losing out as a result of this equality worldview? That anti-racism is actually just against their collective ethnic interests. It works against them in every way! You know what happens then? It’s like when all these non-White people are complaining about racism, it basically just dies out, doesn’t it? The whole thing dies out.

 

I mean what do you think? Why do you, why do you think they do that? Why do you think they appeal to White people whenever they experience discrimination? Why can’t they deal with it themselves? Why can’t they come up with some resolution as a result of their own thinking?

 

[52:09]

 

31 Why Non-Whites Call On Whites When They Experience ‘Discrimination’

top

 

Joel Davis: Well, because they know that they’re in our country. And, if White people en masse basically saw our position as legitimate and joined with us in our cause their position in our country becomes precarious. So they need, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It just occurred to me, maybe she was. I’m kind of just thinking while I’m listening and thinking back to the video as well. Maybe she was afraid? Maybe it wasn’t just anger in her eyes that I saw, but fear as well. Maybe she thought that the fact that banner drop happened, it might be a sign that White people aren’t as anti-racist as they were before and therefore her presence in our country isn’t as secure as she once previously believed? Maybe it’s kind of like a fear reaction, a self preservation thing. Like:

 

“Come on guys, we need to call this out. We can’t let this become the norm or I won’t be able to live here anymore. Fuck!”

 

Maybe it’s something like that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, it’s basically that she’s obviously showing her anxiety. You told a story about when you’re in jail and I thought that was pertinent. Where you were talking about how there was like some non-White guy. This is years ago, when you’re in prison, like before you became so ideological.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a good story.

 

32 Blair’s Prison Story About a Nepalese Taking Advantage of His Kindness

top

 

Joel Davis: I mean, you should tell the story. It’s your story.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m like 22, I think. And, I’m almost done serving my prison sentence in Port Phillip Prison. And this new guy comes in. He’s Nepalese, from Nepal. Tiny little guy. Like he had a man’s face with stubble, but on the body of like an 8 year old boy by our standards. I couldn’t believe how small he was. And he looked like he hadn’t eaten a good meal in weeks.

 

And a little while later I was cooking some eggs. Used to cook eggs on a sandwich press, like on a toasted sandwich maker because we didn’t have anything else to cook on. So you just fire that up, cook your eggs on that. And I was cooking like 10 eggs. I used to buy a maximum amount of eggs you’re allowed to buy as a prisoner, which was three dozen a week. And he walked by and I signalled to him and I gave him some eggs just because he looked so skinny! It was almost irritating me. I’m like:

 

“Get some food into your mate. You look like you need a good meal!”

 

Problem is though he didn’t see it as a random act of kindness. I didn’t realise it at the time, but he saw it as a weakness! He looked at me a certain way and then every day after that he just asked me for more eggs and other stuff too! More than once actually.

 

After that I noticed him looking into my cell as he walked past, seeing what else I had, seeing what he could get out of me. And then a group of Arabs, I saw this happen. They pulled him into a cell, tied him to a toilet and kicked the shit out of him. Probably for no reason. That happens in jail sometimes.

 

And I remember this because I was sitting down while this was happening, a few cells down, I could hear it happening. And he was shouting my name! He was shouting. He couldn’t say my name properly because English was his second language. He was saying “Blaira”. Screaming at the top of his lungs, “Blaira, Blaira”. And they were laughing at him. I could hear them laughing at him, saying:

 

“He’s not going to help you.”

 

And I thought to myself:

 

“What does he expect? Does he expect me to charge in there and take on a pack of wild Arabs like it’s a fucking Bollywood movie?”

 

Like, I realised that just by doing one nice thing for this guy, he just expected me to fall all over myself after that, to come to his aid to protect him and to provide him with whatever else he could get out of me.

 

And I realised, this is a great lesson here. I realised that some people, particularly people of the brown distinction, they don’t see kindness as kindness, they see it as naive weakness! And they just try to leverage more out of you perpetually. And isn’t that a good lesson? Or wouldn’t that be a good lesson for our politicians to learn? Because what are the people coming to this country doing? They’re not grateful for being allowed to come into the country in the first place. They’re not seeing it as an amazing opportunity like the Greeks and the Italians did. They’re not working their asses off to do the best they can for their families. Not all of them, not by a long shot. They’re thinking:

 

“Ha! What a bunch of idiots! What else can I get out of these morons? Oh, I can get housing, I can get welfare, I can get special rights because I’m not White and I’m oppressed! I come from war torn country. Wow, these people are really fucking stupid! What else can I get out of them?”

 

And it just never ends, right? So when you’re kind, when someone’s nice to you, when you’re a White person, right, you think to yourself, great, and you make the most out of the opportunity. You’re thankful for it, but you move on. You don’t keep asking for more. You don’t see kindness as weakness. You just understand that it’s a random act of kindness. Because White people are like that. They’re randomly kind because they just empathise with someone in that situation. In the moment. But it doesn’t mean that you can take advantage.

 

And I don’t know, I thought that was a good story to demonstrate that a lot of people out there who aren’t like us, you shouldn’t show kindness to them. You shouldn’t be so nice to them because they just take advantage of it. They actually just see you as stupid or weak for being nice. Maybe I could have told that story better.

 

[57:30]

 

 

Joel Davis: No, you told the story very well. The word kindness, it’s got the, like, etymologically, it means treating someone as your kin, as your kinsman or kinswoman. It means treating someone like family. Well, these people aren’t your fucking family! Stop treating them like that. They’re taking the piss. I mean, it’s pretty obvious. But that’s how non-Whites think. I was thinking about this today as well, when I was thinking about why it is that, I guess I don’t know where Blair went. I guess we’ll be back soon.

 

33 Elon Musk Admired by Merchant Minded Indian and Asians

top

 

When I was thinking about how come it seems like Asians and Indians, like really respect Elon Musk, whereas White people I find even if, you know, Elon Musk has done things over the last couple years that some of the things that he’s done, people like us have liked. Some of the things that he’s done, we haven’t liked. Right. But he’s been a mixed bag the last couple of years.

 

You know, he’s throwing Romans. He partially restored our guys to Twitter, at least for a period of time. You know, he played to the pro-White thing a little bit. But he doesn’t really seem to be respected overall by people in our group, because everyone can kind of smell, White people can smell that he’s got an agenda, that he’s disingenuous in some way. That because he’s a billionaire! He’s one of the richest men in the world. We don’t trust this guy.

 

Blair Cottrell: No one gets that, … [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! Everyone knows that he’s obviously got an angle that is that there’s a disingenuous angle. Everyone can smell it. Every normal White person could smell it. Left-wing or Right-wing, everyone can smell it!

 

Whereas Asians and Indians, they all think that he’s, like, amazing! Because they’re merchant races. So to them:

 

“Wow, look at how rich and successful he is. And look at all of his companies!”

 

In Australia, when you see a Tesla, you will almost never see a White person driving it. I know in America a lot of Leftists before Elon switched teams, a lot of Leftist Whites were driving Teslas as a status symbol. And that happened a little bit here. But predominantly, if you see a Tesla, it’s a fucking Indian or an Asian driving it in Australia.

 

Blair Cottrell: I have noticed that.

 

Joel Davis: Because they get sucked in by it because he’s like this rock star merchant. But we’re not a mercantile race. It doesn’t jive with us in the same way. These people think differently. It’s the same.

 

34 Indians and Asians Obsessed with Ways to Make and Spend Money

top

 

I’ve said this before whenever I’ve worked with Indians and Asians, and then it’s been like the lunch break or something and was we’re talking just about you know, making conversation, making small talk. What I have found is that all they want to talk about is ways to make money and ways to spend money:

 

“Oh, I’ve got a good deal here. Oh, what do you think about crypto? Which crypto-currencies do you think are good? Oh, have you got a good bet on the cricket? Blah, blah!”

 

It’s all just like, ways of how to exchange m, you know, mercantile information with one another about ways in which we can make money or spend money more efficiently. That’s their entire fixation. When I talk with White people, yeah, those subjects come up occasionally, but generally speaking, it gets into something with a bit more depth in terms of like philosophy on family or life history or our perspective, our values, whatever, right? Music, art, something like that. But I’ve never been able to have much of a conversation about any of these subjects with an Indian or an Asian because they’re soulless!

 

Blair Cottrell: With the merchant brain it doesn’t really matter how you’ve achieved the success, how you own the companies, how you have the capital. What matters is that you’ve got it! You know what I mean? There’s no, like there’s less of a moral compass. It’s just about success for the sake of success, and that’s it. That’s good enough for the merchant. That’s the way they think.

 

35 More on the Nepalese Guy in Prison

top

 

And in regards to the story about the Nepalese guy, by the way, like, if you might be saying:

 

“Oh, that poor guy, he got beat up by people for no reason. Why didn’t you help him, Blair?”

 

Uh you got to understand, this guy’s in jail. I actually heard about this guy’s story. He was an immigrant on a working visa. He was doing an apprenticeship as a chef under an Australian citizen, and he stabbed the head chef! He stabbed an Australian citizen. So he’s in jail for that. Then he was going to be deported when he finished his sentence. So like there’s a reason he’s in jail, being tied to a toilet and having the shit kicked out of him by a group of Arabs. That’s because God wills it! That’s fate. [chuckling] That’s what happens if you come to this country, you’re not from this country, and you stab a citizen in this country. So like, don’t think that I’m in some position where I’m a noble protector of people who are being beaten up. And you should never think the same about yourself either. You see some guy getting stomped on the street, you have to understand that sometimes he’s put himself in that position and it’s happening for a reason.

 

So if you don’t know someone that’s happening to, or it’s not really your business, you stay out of it! That’s kind of the position I would take generally.

 

[1:02:37]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but if it’s a White guy and there’s a pack of nons, particularly if you’re out with the boys, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You read the situation, …

 

Joel Davis: You gotta back your boy. I mean, that’s happened. I’ve been out with the boys quite a few times, and there’s been a White guy getting picked on by a pack of non-Whites. And, the non-Whites picked on the wrong White, like, at the wrong time, because a pack of Nazis just happened to be there and sort it out.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, [chuckling] it can happen. Yeah. No, like I said. Anyway, it’s quite obvious when someone is being targeted unfairly, is being stood over, is being bullied, that kind of thing.

 

36 NSN Promo Clip

top

 

Joel Davis: I’m getting a message from NSN HQ Beaming into my headset. Apparently a new hype edit just dropped. Haven’t even seen this edit. I’m gonna play it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Let’s watch it. Let’s watch and get a raw reaction to it.

 

Joel Davis: Let’s hit it!

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Who makes those, bro? That’s fucking cool! If I was 19, 18, I would join straight away! I mean, put yourself in the position of a young guy growing up in the current conditions, societal conditions. You’re going to join that every time! Whoever sees that and who has any balls left at all is going to join. That’s good stuff. It’s good content.

 

37 On Why You Should Join the Org

top

 

Joel Davis: Imagine, imagine not joining us!

 

Like if you’re an Aussie, you’re a young White dude, even like a middle aged White dude. Join the fucking Org! Like, come on, like be a man, join the clan! You know, fucking hell, like what else are you going to do? What else are you doing? We’re all gonna die! You know, someone close to me died recently. It’s the first time a close member of my family has died so so far in my life and makes you reflect upon, just how quick and short life is and how you got to make it count because who knows, you get hit by a bus tomorrow, who knows?

 

But even if you have a full innings, it’s not that fucking long, you know, it blows, it goes quick and you gotta make it count! You gotta make sure that the time that you do have, you invest it in something worthwhile. And there’s been too many lives wasted amongst our people over recent decades. Too much nihilism, too much individualism in our people are just blowing through their lives on entertainment and trivial matters and you know, trying to make money and just shit that ultimately doesn’t really matter. I’m not saying that you shouldn’t be trying to make money and have a successful career but you know, what really matters, what really matters obviously is your family and your nation legacy that you’re leaving behind, the people that you love and that you care about your people and that’s all that really fucking matters. Everything else is secondary.

 

So you know, join the fucking tribe that’s going to put up a resistance to the genocide of our people for fuck sake. Like whatever else that you’re doing is significantly less important.

 

And it’s fucking fine, like we have a fucking great time! So yeah, join the Org, White Australia.org. You can join as a supporter. But if you want to join as a member, get on Telegram, message White Ausbot. That’s WHITE AUSBOT at White Ausbot on Telegram and get vetted and join the Org.

 

Blair Cottrell: I realised we just had an ad break, a really cool ad break. Like most streams you would get some gay product like you know, “men’s beard straighteners” or something like that! [chuckling] But in this one you get, we interrupt this stream to bring you exclusive new hype edit, Join the Nazi gang! [chuckling]

 

38 Succulent Chinese Meal – Democracy Manifest Guy

top

 

Joel Davis: Oh, yeah! By the way, did you see that thing that Tom posted on Telegram just before we went live here? He got a screenshot from everyone surely knows the:

 

“This is democracy manifest!”

 

You know, that guy, the very famous, he was eating a succulent Chinese meal in King’s Cross [Sydney’s old red light area]. I think this was back in the 90s. And he was arrested and it’s a viral clip. Maybe I should pull it up. Surely everyone’s seen that it’s such a famous meme! Such a famous meme. You know it Blair, surely?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Like the guy getting carried out of the restaurant?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you know the story behind that? The story behind that I, as I heard it is this guy was just travelling around Melbourne eating like really fancy restaurants. I mean, just walking out. So he was getting free dinners every night.

 

Joel Davis: It wasn’t him though.

 

Blair Cottrell: It wasn’t him?

 

Joel Davis: No, no, no! So it was in Sydney. It was in King’s Cross in Sydney. And it was a case of mistaken identity.

 

There was a guy that was doing “dine and dashes” as they call them, and they got the wrong guy or they thought he was doing credit card fraud or something like that. And they come in, they arrest the wrong guy, and he has that hilarious reaction. And now it’s you know, it’s a goated meme. It’s funny how like 50% of Australian memes are some guy getting arrested or engaging with police in some way because we’re a convict colony. It’s like, …

 

[1:09:05]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s funny how they have the wrong guy. They have the wrong guy, but he still just gives them so much grief! And it’s a complete smart ass, just by Aussie instinct.

 

I mean, I thought he was the guilty one from the way he reacted, but he’s not. He’s just Australian. [chuckling] And that’s his reaction to authority trying to tell him what to do.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, it’s awesome! It’s goated. It’s legendary. But Tom posted a screenshot from the Wikipedia article. Unfortunately, rest in peace. I believe he passed away. He was 82, but he passed away, I think a couple years ago. But it says here:

 

“In 2023, true crime author Mark Dappin published a biography of Carlson, (so his last name was Carlson) titled ‘Carnage A Succulent Chinese Meal, Mr. Rent a Kill, and the Australian Manson Murders’ that explores his connections to other criminals. The book revealed that Carlson was an admirer of Adolf Hitler and Nazism. And then on at least one occasion he threw a party at his home to celebrate Hitler’s birthday!”

 

Jack Carlson was his name.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Wow, I didn’t know any of that. That’s really interesting.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so, pretty funny!

 

So the “Succulent Chinese Meal-Democracy Manifest Guy” was our guy! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: You can tell by the way he speaks that he’s a well read individual. You know, he’s quite articulate.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, absolutely! I think he was like a Shakespearean actor. He would act in Shakespearean productions and stuff.

 

39 Blair Giving a Lift to a Stranger

top

 

Blair Cottrell: So, yeah, it’s so interesting the lives people live and you wouldn’t know it. Like you walk pass people on the street.

 

For example, I was getting my car serviced recently and there was an old guy at the mechanic who was also leaving his car there and he had no way to get home, and he lived on the other side of town. So I said:

 

“I’ll take you home, mate, jump in.”

 

I was picking my car up actually, so it was when I was leaving, took him home and we were talking in the car for about 10 minutes. The guy did like 15 years in the Australian Navy, had been to like eight different countries and just had this incredible story, this life story that you wouldn’t have expected. Like he just seemed like some random old homeless guy [chuckling] from the way he was dressed.

 

But yeah, everyone’s got a really interesting set of experiences and if you just ask them the questions, you realise that there’s a lot of little individual worlds going on out there. So much knowledge, a wealth of knowledge. And if you just take an interest and god, I can’t give that advice enough to Zoomers! Zoomers don’t ask enough questions, man!

 

I mean, I love you guys, I love how fast paced you are, how quickly your minds tick over. But you have to ask more questions, right? There’s so much to learn from out there, so much knowledge to absorb.

 

40 More on the Musk-Trump Fallout

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, absolutely! Yeah, let’s talk about the Trump and Elon fallout because it’s quite interesting. Apparently they have a meeting scheduled tomorrow to try and patch things up. So but it was quite interesting.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you reckon it’s some kind of a stunt with an agenda behind it? Does it seem contrived to you?

 

Joel Davis: No, I don’t think so. I think it’s a genuine falling out because Musk donated more, he was the biggest donor to Trump’s campaign. Not only did he donate heaps, but he also bought X and reformatted the whole site to make it more amenable to Trump’s election campaign, which it’s hard to quantify exactly what impact that had on the election, but it was only positive, whatever the impact was.

 

And obviously he got very close to Trump. He was on the campaign trail in the administration. Early days it seemed like every time Trump was doing a press conference Musk was there with him with his like kids and shit and you know, they seem like best buds all of a sudden. But then in recent months they seem to have drifted and Musk isn’t really getting what he wants. I saw he wasn’t happy with the tariffs. That obviously negatively affects his business interests. He was vocal about that. He’s, not happy with. Trump openly rejects the concept of global warming and backs coal and oil, and these traditional industries, even nuclear energy, but has a lot of contempt for so-called green energy programmes and rebates and subsidies and all that kind of stuff.

 

And so now they’re trying to get rid of those which would really negatively affect Tesla because the electronic vehicle rebates make them competitive in the marketplace in the United States. And the tariff regime is not good either way whether they make Teslas in America or outside America. Either they’re exporting out of America and paying a tariff or they’re bringing it into America and paying a tariff. It’s not good from his perspective.

 

And then also from the perspective of SpaceX I saw Trump say that Elon Musk proposed someone to be head of NASA and Trump knocked back because the guy was a Democrat or something is what he said. I don’t know much about it, but obviously Elon was trying to install his guy in NASA because he’s the number one contractor to the US government when it comes to basically rockets and you know, space faring technologies, etc.

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe Trump was worried that Elon was going to figure out that NASA is all bullshit! Just a way for the American government to divert funds into unknown endeavours. Or maybe I’m wrong. Maybe they are launching a lot of space satillites.

 

[1:14:42]

 

Joel Davis: I don’t think they give that much of a shit about space exploration. But I think NASA is mostly about building rocket tech and other technologies, imaging technologies, etcetera, in order to, create intercontinental weapons systems.

 

And obviously Trump is now pushing forward with trying to build, the Golden Dome to try and build new weapons tech that will potentially be able to neutralise the intercontinental ballistic missiles of their adversaries and neutralise their capacity to obliterate them with nuclear weapons through trying to intercept them mid flight and so on.

 

41 Musk and Big AI Contracts and Peter Thiel the Homosexual Billionaire

top

 

There’s also big AI contracts that were given out to Palantir, which is Peter Thiel’s company. Peter Thiel and Elon Musk are old associates that go back a long way. Peter Thiel actually fucked Elon Musk over, back when Elon Musk was CEO of PayPal. Thiel did a hostile takeover and kind of took over PayPal from Elon Musk back in the early 2000s when he was on his wedding honeymoon, and fucked him over. So they’re old enemies of sorts.

 

And Peter Thiel is the homosexual billionaire who was also basically responsible for J.D. Vance’s political career. He basically funded him all the way up into the Vice Presidency, first into the Senate and then into the Vice Presidency. Very key power player in American politics.

 

And so it seems like he won out over Elon on the AI contract because obviously Elon Musk has been developing Grok under X in order to develop AI capacity. So Musk has lost out on quite a few counts. And he’s obviously upset about that for perhaps obvious reasons. But it’s like as I said on I said on Telegram, it really goes to show that even if you’re like the number one campaign donor to Trump, it doesn’t buy you that much.

 

42 Trump’s Relationship with the Jews, and the Epstein Case

top

 

And so it really, like, begs the question when it comes to Trump’s relationship with the jews, it seems like it’s more than just campaign financing. It’s almost like the jews have a deeper hold over him than just that, a deeper connection with him than just that. And the campaign financing is secondary. It’s just that he’s their guy, so they give him money to help him get elected.

 

But, you know, it indicates that he’s not just doing the bidding of Israel because they threw a few hundred million at him in his political campaign. But there’s something deeper.

 

And of course, Elon Musk came out today and he’s throwing shit at Trump, accusing him of being in the Epstein files, and that’s why they haven’t been released. And was sharing videos of Trump, you know, chumming up with Epstein back in the day and dancing with him at a party and talking to him about all these girls that he was gonna bang at this party. Or whatever. And strongly implying that Trump was somehow involved in the whole Epstein Island thing. And I don’t know if that’s true or not, but there definitely is nefarious connections there of some sort between him and Epstein because they were associates.

 

But also there’s pictures of [chuckling] Elon Musk with what’s her name? Ghislaine Maxwell as well. So it’s not like Elon Musk has no connection to these people. So anyway, shit is being thrown in either direction. It’s pretty interesting to see a fallout like this.

 

43 On Trump’s Charisma

top

 

And I think that if they don’t patch it up, I think Musk comes off worse than Trump. Like, Musk, you know, came up with the big guns, trying to de-legitimize Trump. But the thing is, Trump supporters are so fucking loyal. Like, Trump has been screwing them over for like a decade, giving them basically nothing that he promised almost for a decade, and they are as loyal as fuck! Because the thing is that Trump has rizz. Trump is the most memeable human being on earth alive today. Like, he’s got incredible charisma, he’s funny, he’s likeable! Elon Musk, however, is not likeable.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I just wanted to add in addition to him being charismatic, the guy, I don’t know whether this is deliberate or not, but slotting himself into little, like, TV show cameos, classic American film, like when he appears in Home Alone inside that hotel and speaks to Macaulay Culkin, stuff like that really embedded him into American culture! It really made him a folk hero of the people of America. All of that is great PR. It’s almost like a long term strategy to becoming president later in life. It’s like it’s all worked to his advantage.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But like, you can’t deny that there’s just so many incredible moments from Trump. Like, there’s no end to it. Like when he almost got shot. It was awesome!

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s cool!

 

[1:19:33]

 

 

Joel Davis: When he got arrested, the mug shot he did was just goated. The time when he came out of the plane and Ruth Bader Ginsburg had just died and he was like:

 

“I did not know that! You’re telling me for the first time!”

 

Like, I could go on for like an hour talking about meme-able moments from Trump. Like, it just never ends. Americans love him because they identify with him. He’s kind of like, “that’s my president!” It’s almost like he’s like an avatar of patriotism in America, for better or worse. Right?

 

44 Trump’s Leverage over Musk

top

 

Elon Musk isn’t even really American, doesn’t even have an American accent. He wasn’t born in America. He doesn’t have that kind of loyalty from the people. And he’s kind of like awkward nerd, and so doesn’t have that kind of loyalty. But also, Elon Musk doesn’t have the leverage. Elon Musk companies, SpaceX, Tesla, they’re dependent upon government subsidies and contracts which Trump can control. And Trump came out and said:

 

“You know what, maybe one way that we could cut all the wasteful government spending that Elon has a problem with is to cut all of the subsidies and government contracts that Elon Musk has. Maybe that would be like the first thing to do. I don’t know why Biden didn’t do that.”

 

And so he’s basically threatening to just take an axe to his fortune. And Trump has the leverage to do that if he wanted to.

 

SpaceX is, they’re saying, has lost like half of its value in one day because of Elon’s antics today. And you know, there’s an argument I saw Steve Bannon come out and say that the Trump administration should just like, seize SpaceX as a national security asset off Musk entirely. And which it could if it wanted to. It has the ability to do that. I’m not saying that it’s going to do that. Trump is notoriously kind of moderate. He doesn’t punish his political enemies anywhere near hard enough. And he’s had that tendency for a long time. I wouldn’t expect it to change here. Probably wouldn’t go after Musk too hard. But he’s holding up the cards.

 

Whereas, like, what cards does Musk really have? Like, if Musk threatened to go and say:

 

“Oh, I’m going to go sell rockets to the Chinese instead of you!”

 

They’re just going to take SpaceX off him. If Trump doesn’t want to subsidise his Teslas, eat shit! What is he going to do about it?

 

45 Musk as a Capitalist, a Merchant and a Con Man

top

 

He can’t go to the Democrats and try and like, support the Democrats. They all hate him now. Like, he’s completely burned that bridge because over the last year or two, Musk has said more radical things than Trump has ever said about White genocide and issues facing White People. And I didn’t support Musk because he’s also gone against us on key issues. Like, I remember over Christmas and New Year he went against us on the whole H1B Visa thing. Apparently White people don’t work hard enough when they need to mass import Indians into America to prop up the tech industry. Which just goes to show how Musk is a fraud, doesn’t really believe in anything seemingly. And he just kind of cares about his bottom line, ultimately. For all the ideological bravado and idealism that he presents when he goes on the Joe Rogan podcast or something, it seems like he’s at the end of the day, he’s a fucking capitalist, he’s a merchant and he’s a con man. He kind of acts like he’s like a libertarian who’s against excess government spending and all this kind of stuff, yet he’s like the biggest net beneficiary of government handouts in America.

 

So I think people have a lot less patience for him than for Trump, and Trump has the leverage. So if Musk doesn’t cuck to Trump and doubles down, I could see this being like a death spiral for Elon Musk potentially, which I’d love to see because number one, it’d be funny. And number two, a punished Elon Musk. He could end up doing interesting stuff that destabilises politics in a way that opens up opportunities perhaps for us. You know, it’s its kind of like a wild card. Like the world’s richest man also pissed off at the government with like no political allies. What does he do next? Probably something interesting.

 

So hopefully they don’t patch it up tomorrow and we just like see this feud like exacerbate because it would be it’d be interesting at the very least, but it could potentially result in more free speech on X rather than less, or something where he goes off the reservation. I don’t know, tries to win, win us back somehow by playing to us more.

 

46 Blair Thinks Musk Will Patch Things up with Trump

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe finally my like mid takes that aren’t even that extreme, me and those takes will be allowed back on X. Like out of everyone that got censored, you got to admit, censoring me was one of the most unfair moves.

 

I mean, I try to play by the rules, I try to be the nice guy, but as I’ve said previously in politics, like being the nice guy doesn’t really get you anywhere. Sometimes you got to be the bad guy.

 

But I think they’ll patch it up, man! I think they’ll come to some sort of agreement, because especially in. By what you’ve just described it’s in Musk’s interests to really try to get somewhere with this. Right. It’s not really wise for him to be in Trump’s bad books. But it also goes to show that a lot of the time, political donors don’t have as much power as a lot of people think they do they probably have a lot more power in Australia, [chuckling] but in America, maybe not so much. A lot of the time the people they’re backing can turn on them for various reasons because politics is a bit unpredictable like that.

 

Joel Davis: Well, it goes to show that maybe it’s like the Mossad getting you on video banging underage people or, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Joel Davis: Capturing your children and marrying your children into their bloodlines and things like that are probably more significant than just who writes the checks, like, on some level.

 

Blair Cottrell: And they figured that out eventually, didn’t they? Like, foreign intelligence agencies would have figured out that eventually that money on its own just isn’t enough. They need more leverage over these personalities in countries of interest. But whenever there’s a big split or disagreement between two powerful characters in a country of interest, then it’s a good opportunity for subversives to sort of jump onto the scene as well. And it may, in some cases be the result of the work of subversives. So there’s that to take into consideration for Trump and Musk.

 

[1:25:43]

 

47 Trump’s ‘Big Dog’ Style of Treating Opponents

top

Joel Davis: I hope that their egos get the better of them. Because one thing you notice about Trump is when he has leverage over someone, he flexes on them. Like, I remember when he was kind of staunching in the first administration, he was staunching Kim Jong Un, and he was calling him Little Rocket Man, and he was like:

 

“You’ve got little rockets, I’ve got big rockets. You know don’t fuck with me. Like, if you want to test them out, we’ll send out big rockets and blow up your little rockets!”

 

And then Kim Jong Un ended up inviting him to North Korea, and Trump is standing in the demilitarised zone in Korea, and he was doing the little bunny ears behind Kim Jong Un for all the cameras, just kind of ridiculing him.

 

Or like, when he had Zelensky in the White House, you know, he Was big dogging him in front of the cameras. Trump big dogs world leaders, all the time. He kind of stands over them and he shakes their hand all aggressive and like, pulls them in. He’s got this kind of like natural kind of like dominance aura that he uses to, obviously his advantage. He is successful in politics and business for a reason. He knows how to put himself about. And he’s a great shit talker. He’s always shit talking all of his fucking rivals.

 

Elon’s gone pretty scorched earth here! Elon’s going on Twitter and is accusing him of being a fucking paedophile! He’s going hard! Like, it’s not just like saying you disagree over this or that government policy. Like, he’s going full scorched earth, saying he wants to fund a new political party that can take on the Republicans. And like he retweeted Ian Miles Chong saying:

 

“Trump should be impeached for being on Epstein’s island and J.D. Vance should become president.”

 

And all this kind of shit! So he’s going pretty hard.

 

48 Trump’s Appeal to Conspiratorial Paranoia

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Some of these relationships in politics, even amongst the world’s most powerful people are so fragile. What I was going to say is Trump is relentless. He knows how to appeal to the conspiratorial paranoia. Maybe it’s not paranoia, maybe it’s on point, but just the conspiratorial nature of a lot of his supporters. Like when he mentioned Elon’s black eye and before he was going on some show, he offered him some makeup to cover it up. And Elon didn’t want the makeup, which he thought was interesting. We all know what he’s insinuating there. There’s some weird theory about all of these celebrities that are in some sort of club and at one point they’ve all had black eyes, which may be part of some sort of ritual or initiation process. I don’t know. But maybe Trump doesn’t know either.

 

But the fact that he knows how to appeal to that strong nature of a lot of the people that support him, that’s interesting that he’ll, …

 

49 Trump is a High Level Freemason and is Supported by the Deep State

top

 

Joel Davis: Trump is a high level Freemason. He knows the score. Yeah, he knows what’s happening. He’s in charge for a reason. People were saying:

 

“Oh, Joel! (idiots online) Oh, Joel! If the Deep State has been against Trump for years, if he really went to Epstein’s island, they would have released it!”

 

The Deep State are totally fine with Trump being the fucking President of the United States. You think he’d be able to just waltz into the presidency if the Deep State had an issue? Like, if you’re in my Telegram chat, how are you still operating on this Qtard, like surface level understanding, like, Trump is fucking part of the Deep State! He’s chosen by the Deep State, you fucking idiots!

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, well, why did they attack him, Joel? Why did they go so crazy attacking him during his first presidency then? How do you explain that? You know what it is? This is my take.

 

Joel Davis: Okay.

 

50 Blair’s View of Trump and the Deep State

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Sometimes when you, as a subversive, when you’re into psych warfare, when you’re trying to create a fifth column, sleeper agents, you’re funding them, you’re setting them up. Sometimes when you breed a mad attack dog which has a lot of little weird attack dog puppies, those attack dogs can kind of run loose and it’s hard to get control of them. That’s what I think happened in America with that whole situation. I think there’s wild attack dogs that were just on the loose [chuckling] and it’s been hard to clean up the mess that they’ve made. That’s what I think that whole nonsense was.

 

Joel Davis: Think about it. They didn’t want Trump to win in 2020. They’re dropping Covid pandemics, which had other purposes other than that, obviously. They’re dropping BLM riots, they’re burning down the cities of America. They’re completely rigging the election. They’re launching crazy psyops. Right? This time they just stood down and let him win.

 

So obviously he was allowed to win! Obviously, they wanted him to win this time because things have changed. There’s a shift in strategy and there’s a recognition that he’s the guy for, …

 

51 Why Trump was Put Back In

top

 

Blair Cottrell: It might be that they realised that it was inevitable that he would win, that., …

 

Joel Davis: No! It wasn’t inevitable! They could easily have just rigged it again. They actually undermined Biden too, and took him out before the election was even going to happen.

 

Blair Cottrell: I disagree. I disagree. I think they need to maintain, at least ostensibly, some semblance of legitimacy. They can’t just keep rigging every election, obviously. Right?

 

[1:31:02]

 

Joel Davis: They didn’t though. I’m not saying this election was rigged, but what I’m saying is that they stood down, they didn’t obstruct him from winning this time because Israel got attacked. Biden wasn’t doing enough to protect Israel and the Democrats weren’t. Because the rise of China, issues with Russia. The American foreign policy was not working under the old paradigm. And there was a recognition that they needed to switch to a more realist framework that Trump was providing. Trump was going to provide the leadership that was going to bring people., … No one was signing up to the military anymore. We’re veering towards a potential World War III scenario, but no one wants to join the military. Need to wind the woke back, need to get Americans, you know, back behind their government, back behind their president, back into the military. Trump was just gloating today in a press conference with the German Chancellor Merz. They’re saying:

 

“Oh, it’s the 80th anniversary of D-Day.”

 

Or whatever. And he’s like:

 

“That wasn’t a good day for you, was it?”

 

And then Merz was like:

 

“No, well, no, it was a great day for us because you saved us from the Nazi dictatorship!”

 

And Trump’s like:

 

“Oh, yeah, of course!”

 

But Trump was saying you know, that the Germans need to do what he’s done to replenish their military, that no one wants to fight for Germany right now because they don’t have any spirit. He’s like:

 

“What we have done, we’re recruiting like crazy right now because we’ve brought the spirit back.”

 

And that’s obviously, the spirit comes, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, the spirit comes back to the Germans?

 

Joel Davis: There’s a recognition in the American Deep State that you need to have Trump running it to get the goys back on the team! White men are not playing for the team anymore. And they can’t run a global empire without the White guys running the companies running the military and so on. Rank and file. White men are the foundation of American power. And if you alienate them, America is no longer able to run the world. That’s why he was allowed to win!

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. But there’s people that play all sides, obviously, and if they predict or are able to understand that somebody’s rise is inevitable and can no longer be sort of, the floodgates have to come down and something needs to be allowed to happen, then it’s going to happen on their terms. Still, it’s a mistake to believe that there are sort of world players controlling literally everything in politics. Like, politics is a bit of a chaotic place and, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but this is national power plays in American politics. Like you could see before Israel was attacked on, was it October 7, 2023, Trump was behind Biden in the polls and was basically consistently behind Biden in all the polls for three years. Then as soon as, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you remember the polls before the 2016 Trump election? Was it 2015 or 2016? 2016, wasn’t it? The polls had Hillary at like 90% one week before the election.

 

52 The Role of October 7 and Trump

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, because they miscalculated. But the thing is, the polls were accurate this time. And the polls were accurate this time. And what it showed was that basically after October 7th, then all of a sudden the media, the jewish media, start attacking Biden. Rather than covering Biden’s arse for being fucking, basically off with the fairies and senile, they stopped covering his arse and they started exposing him to scrutiny, because Biden wasn’t playing ball for Netanyahu in Israel. It was very clear to see. And then Trump started getting boosted.

 

They had Trump by the balls. They had him in court over so many different court cases, it was looking like they were going to throw him in prison. So he couldn’t even, I mean he could still run from prison technically, but he’s probably not going to win the presidency from a prison cell. They had Trump by the balls, and then all of a sudden Supreme Court decision bails him out! This is after October 7th and then boom! Like Trump comes back and you know, Elon Musk buys Twitter, gets behind him, all the big jew donors get behind him, hundreds of millions get dropped behind him and then it looks like Trump is inevitable and then everyone goes:

 

“Oh, yeah, Trump was always going to win!”

 

But no, I was following this for years. It looked like there’s no, Trump might have been the Republican nominee, it looked like Trump was going to be thrown in prison.

 

So they had Trump fucked and then they let him off. They let him win!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Well, I trust your judgement because I know that you follow American politics a lot more closely than I do. The awkward situation now though, it seems for America, but for the world, or especially probably starting with America as a balancing act that needs to be struck with American culture where some sort of re-nationalised spirit, as you put it, needs to be helped to resurface without the country becoming ethnically nationalist at the same time. Which I think is its easy to do that in America, isn’t it? Because America is so multi-ethnic, whereas it’s not so easy to do in other countries. And that’s the balancing act that I suppose the Trump administration is going to try to strike for various reasons. Obviously they need to recruit more soldiers, police, etc. So interesting to see how that pans out.

 

[1:35:58]

 

53 Taking the Boot off the Neck of Whites

top

 

Joel Davis: They’re obviously taking the boot off the neck of Whites and they’re throwing bones to Whites at the moment. The political elements that are more conservative, the obstructions have been taken out of their ways obviously, like Leftists are still against them for ideological reasons. But the dirty tricks that were being played before stop being played. They got out of the way. The key power players.

 

And then you start seeing Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, these guys were funding Biden and funding the election security efforts and so on in 2020 and all that kind of thing, censoring Trump off all their platforms and so on. They’re all at the inauguration, they’re all shaking hands with Trump this time. There was a total sea change in the attitude of these elites. And there’s a reason for that. It doesn’t just happen because “the people” decided that they wanted him to be president. The people didn’t really change their perspective at all! It was the elites that changed their perspective, from my stance. But yeah, anyway, it’ll be interesting to see what happens.

 

54 Joel Will Be on with Thomas777 Re Philosophical Anti-Semitism, etc.

top

 

I see people saying:

 

“For real though, Joel is rocking the Thomas777 look!”

 

Well, actually I was just talking to Thomas earlier. I think Monday night Australian time, Monday morning American time. We’re going to do a, another collab. We’re going to talk about philosophical anti-semitism. We’re going to talk about Martin Heidegger. We’re going to get into the weeds of political philosophy and you know, NS philosophy and its precursors and so on. So it should be interesting stream for those who are looking for something a little bit intellectual. But our way inclined. Thomas is always an enjoyable collaborator. I’ve done a lot of podcasts with him over the years. He’s a good friend. So I’ll put up a link for that when the time comes. But yeah, like I said, Monday night, I think Monday morning America time.

 

People are saying that you were trying to speak but you’re muted.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I just realised that before. But that’s okay. I was just saying that it’s curious. Oh, it’s not really curious. It doesn’t even, it doesn’t need to be said. It’s fine. That’s why I didn’t even pick up on it.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, okay. I was looking at at something else. I wasn’t looking at the screen. Is there another, any other subjects for us to cover?

 

Blair Cottrell: No, I don’t think so. I’ve had a busy week so I only got a couple of days to actually spend or maybe a day and a half where I actually had time enough to post to my social media this week. But I’m going to look at spending a bit more time making some more clip content and putting some more stuff out there. So I’m looking forward to that.

 

But I think we, what do we do? We did the NSN banner drop at Northland Shopping Centre. We did the speculation around that, or not speculation, just discussion around the response. Then we did Elon versus Trump. What else has happened the last week? Is there anything else?

 

55 Thomas Sewell on the Ex-UFC Fighter Jake Shields Show

top

 

Joel Davis: I don’t think of any like huge stories. I see Anthony Scalise saying:

 

“Joel, any information on the Jake Shields collab?”

 

Yeah, Tom recorded a podcast with Jake Shields on the Jake Shields Show this week. I don’t know exactly when that is going to be released but I think soon. So obviously it’s already been recorded. So that’s an interesting one.

 

Obviously I’ve been on Jake’s podcast before. He’s a friend. And yeah it’s great, it’s great that he’s has platform Ed not only me, but Tom as well. That he’s platforming Australian nationalists. You know, ex-UFC fighter. No, he’s not a Nazi. He’s not as radical as us, but he’s at least open to like hearing our perspective and platforming our perspective. And you know he’s always very critical of jewish power and he’s sympathetic towards pro-White politics. So you know, it’s nice to have a platform like that to break the siege. Obviously we’re under censorship, pretty heavy censorship. Tom and I and you, some of the most censored people in the world. Like we’re censored from fucking everything!

 

56 Still Banned from X Jew to Oz Government Pressure

top

 

Blair Cottrell: So yeah, that’s what I was going to say. It’s like, I hope that Tom took the opportunity to try to put the message out there. And, I don’t know, maybe Jake can help put pressure on the right people to get us back on X. Because it sucks not being on X! It sucks not being part of the conversation around the world. You know, Telegram these days, Telegram was pretty big during Covid I remember a lot of people came to Telegram to get their news during the Covid era, the lockdowns and all that shit! But these days, everyone’s kind of moved on from Telegram. There’s still the kind of little small loyalist following that I have on there, but it’s just not the reach is nowhere near what it would be if we could get on X as well.

 

And as I just mentioned earlier, it’s a really unfair ban, I think. I mean, you look at the kind of stuff that’s posted on X, and especially the content I was putting out there, it wasn’t even that bad. It’s obviously like part of some contrived effort or pressure.

 

Joel Davis: The Australian government requested that we be banned.

 

Blair Cottrell: We don’t have any evidence of that, but it looks that way. It’s kind of obvious that that’s what happened because we all got taken down at the same time. All our appeals got ignored! We haven’t even had a single. I haven’t had a single reply. Have you had a reply from X staff?

 

Joel Davis: No! Usually when you get banned, they send you an email saying you’ve been banned. I didn’t even get that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Correct! I didn’t get that either. And I haven’t had a single, I’ve appealed a few times, haven’t had a single reply. They’re just like, fuck you! It’s like, what do I actually even do to get banned? Bullshit!

 

We were in the gym, Joel and I, just having a conversation, and some young guys overheard our conversation and they approached us and said:

 

“Hey, do you guys have social media? Where can we find you guys?”

 

And we had to tell them:

 

“Well, we’re kind of banned off everything. We have Rumble.”

 

They didn’t even know what Rumble was. And they said:

 

“Are you on X?”

 

And we said:

 

“No, we’re banned off X.”

 

And they laughed and said:

 

“How did you get banned off X?”

 

And I realised that to the standard person, X just seems to be a place where you can say whatever you want. So they’re like:

 

“Wow, what the hell did you post to get banned off X?”

 

They assume that you’ve posted something really bad, like gore or hectic shit that no one would want to see! But it wasn’t that. It was just because we are dissidents in Australia. It’s because the Australian government requested to X that we were banned. And it’s like, it made me realise how kind of like forced into the corner we are down here in Australia.

 

57 The Censorship is Preventing Them from Being a Sought After Voice in Oz

top

 

And what’s most frustrating I reckon. I don’t know if this is like big noting myself, but I could say the same for Joel, I think. If it wasn’t for all the censorship, I’m quite confident that I would still be one of the most sought after voices for just general commentary in this country. Because the following I had before I was banned was massive! I used to get the same reach as Channel 9, 7 and 10 put together on Facebook, at least, when I was allowed to use Facebook back in the day. And I would have only grown from there. I get banned and then Avi Yemeni kind of takes my place and all the former audience I used to have just watch him because there’s no one else to watch anymore.

 

That’s the problem with censorship. Like, you get kind of like taken off the table or off the stage, screen, whatever, and some like bullshit jewish Israel shill takes your place and just talks some shit and sort of spells the audience and misleads them, takes their money for all sorts of nefarious purposes:

 

“Guys, I’m in the back of a police car. You need to donate to my legal fund right now!”

 

You know, it’s like the results of the censorship have been dreadful! And it works, doesn’t it? Censorship? It really does.

 

[1:43:51]

 

 

58 Avi Yemeni Scamming His Supporters

top

 

Joel Davis: How is he getting thrown? How’s he getting arrested? They don’t even take his phone off him. Like, get fucking! That’s obviously, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. You know what they did? I know this too. Like, I heard about this. I wouldn’t say this if it wasn’t true too. That video, I think it was a few years ago where Avi Yemeni claimed he had been arrested unfairly because he was just trying to report on something. It might have been a lockdown rally or something. He was in the back of a police car instantly demanding money for a legal fund because the police had arrested him. They literally just drove him down the street and just dropped him up the next suburb. They didn’t even really arrest him, they just took him down the road. And everyone who donated just got fleeced! Just got fucking scammed! And that’s so sad, man, that people are trying to do the right thing. They’re believing in something, they want to support someone who they believe is representing them. And that’s what happens. You just get some jewish Israel shill taking your money and laughing at you. That’s what Avi does. He takes people’s money and he laughs at them. So it’s a shame, but that’s the kind of that censorship has facilitated.

 

59 Despite Censorship Our Recognition in the Public is Growing

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, I mean, even despite the censorship, we still go insanely viral all the time. Like, I was talking to some family members of mine, I won’t say who, younger guys the other day, and one of them was like:

 

“Oh, Joel. All the kids at school were like, watching this video and then they were showing it to me and it was you talking about Hitler! And I was like, ‘that’s my cousin!’.”

 

And then my other cousin goes:

 

“Oh, yeah, that’s like I saw this other video of you talking about Hitler on TikTok the other day. It had like millions of likes.”

 

I was like:

 

“Okay, I don’t even know what video that is.”

 

But, I mean, that’s pretty funny. Like I hear people say that all the time. They saw me on Instagram, they saw me on TikTok. I don’t even have accounts on these platforms. It’s just other people reposting it.

 

So obviously, even despite the censorship that we have, by being organically interesting we’re still known out there. Every time I go out in Sydney or Melbourne, if I go out to the city for a drink or something, at least one person comes up to me and recognises me and says:

 

“Oh, hey, it’s great to meet you. Keep doing what you’re doing, if not more.”

 

We’ve become infamous in Australia, or maybe famous, you could say, even in Australia, despite everything, despite how we’ve been treated.

 

Blair Cottrell: So I know that you like to look at the glass half full, which is what you’re doing now, but I realised you are right, now that I think about it. When I said censorship works, it works at first! It works to sort of not nullify, but significantly reduce your reach, but only for a year or two. And then gradually, if you’re consistent and if you try to find every way around the censorship possible. Yeah, you do you become more infamous. You become even more sought after, I think.

 

And the longer and more aggressively you’re censored, the more consistent you are in response to that, the more infamous you can potentially become. So it’s kind of like that real cliche saying that tyranny actually just feeds tyrants and censorship is a form of modern tyranny, which in the long run actually just feeds more people into our audience basket.

 

[1:47:25]

 

Joel Davis: Well, I don’t think so. I think if we had no censorship we’d have a much bigger viewership.

 

Blair Cottrell: Obviously it’d just grow faster. It just grow more organically. Right? But think of it like this. Think of it like a weed. I’m not saying that we’re like a weed, but that’s how the government views us. And they’re spraying us with poison. That’s what censorship is. And it, like, prevents us from growing, but it doesn’t kill us. We actually just start adapting to the poison and then they have to spray us with a lot more poison to get the same effect that they got previously. Then that poison doesn’t work. So they’ve got to go for some higher grade shit!

 

But all that’s actually happening is we’re adapting. We’re being forced to adapt the organism that we are to the circumstances imposed on us. That’s what censorship kind of forces you to do. I suppose.

 

60 Surviving the Censorship Because What We Have to Say is So Interesting

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

But I mean, the only reason that we’re able to get around, like, pretty much no one would be able to survive this level of censorship. The only reason that we can is because we’re just that interesting.

 

Blair Cottrell: And also very autistic. So we don’t really feel emotionally crushed by it. You know, it’s kind of like:

 

“Oh we got censored again. Okay.”

 

It’s like, [chuckling] you don’t really get disheartened by it, right?

 

61 Censorship Does Make It Hard to Recruit People Because They Don’t Know How to Join

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I think it’s more that we’re so motivated by our cause that we’re not going to stop.

 

But yeah, the main effect of censorship is actually this. Actually we managed to get out there and still be known and get talking points out there, get attention. But what’s difficult is recruiting people to our organisation because people will see a clip, people will see a news broadcast, they’ll see us, they’ll be aware that we exist. But they won’t really know:

 

“Okay, how do I go and like, join these guys or find out more?”

 

And if they go to look online to try and find out more, it’s hard to actually find the details. So that’s the main difficulty.

 

62 the System is Afraid of Us Recruiting Thousands of Men

top

 

It’s that it’s actually preventing us from recruiting effectively and that’s obviously why they do it, because what they’re really afraid of, it’s not just us being popular, people watching our videos. What they’re really afraid of is us building a movement of thousands and thousands of men. That’s what they’re petrified of!

 

And so that’s what their efforts are all about. Whether it be the way, how heavily we’re policed to try and intimidate people out of getting involved in the movement whether it be the way they go after people try and like take away their livelihoods. Censorship, all of it centres around trying to create obstacles for us to recruit people where the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s truek.

 

Joel Davis: Making as difficult as possible to get a bunch of nationalists in the same room or the same place together.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s part of the government’s counter extremist efforts, which are, I’ve said previously, are just repurposed counterinsurgency.

 

The point is to prevent you from appealing to the public and then especially from recruiting from the public, or for recruiting from the public.

 

So what happens is if you’re a dissident, one that can potentially threaten the current regime, you get classed as an “extremist” and then you’re susceptible or targeted by counter extremist measures which include censorship, harassment ostracism from society, losing bank account, blah, blah, blah, the list goes on and on.

 

But as I’ve said, that’s not actually legal to do that in a democracy.

 

So eventually names, identities of people who are responsible for actually directing certain government agencies or setting up and being involved in government agencies that are doing that to Australian citizens, that are classifying them as extremists, basically stripping all their rights away and then just harassing and bullying them, preventing them from participating in society on a normal level. Eventually those people will be brought to justice.

 

63 Communists and Other Anti-Racist Activists Have Embedded Themselves Within Our Key Institutions

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! And that’s the thing, that’s what Australians don’t realise. There are communists and other anti-racist activists that have embedded themselves within our key institutions, not just at the academic level but at the policing level. And they’re engaging in political policing under the auspices of so-called “Counter Terrorism” measures. We’re not terrorists by any definition of that term. And even the head of ASIO has agreed with this multiple times under Senate scrutiny that we’re not terrorists and we can’t be classified as terrorists, we don’t engage in terroristic activity.

 

But then they go:

 

“But oh, you’re extremist!”

 

What is an extremist? I saw an old interview, actually, of you and Tom from way back in the day, Blair, on a Current Affair, talking about African crime actually, I think it was from like 2019 or something. And they accused you of being an extremist. And what Tom said was that:

 

“An extremist is just someone who takes an idea to its logical conclusion.”

 

And that’s literally all it is. It’s just taking an idea that seriously that you 100% believe in it, rather than being like these politicians who claim to have a whole set of different ideals but don’t take them to their logical conclusion, either because they don’t have the ideals, or because if you actually took them to their logical conclusion there’ll be very bad ideals. Like when it comes to, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But it depends on what the logical conclusion is, though.

 

[1:52:40]

 

64 Because We Have Ideals They Call That “Extremism”

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But if you take Leftism to its logical conclusion, it would result in basically exterminating White people, like in a very aggressive way.

 

And if you took our ideas to their logical conclusion, it would basically restore Australia to being a great country, across every metric and make your life, if you’re a normal White person, so much better than it is right now. But that’s what we’re guilty of we’re just guilty of actually having ideals and they call that “extremism”.

 

So basically what they’re trying to do is they’re trying to make it illegal essentially for you to have Right-wing ideals, for you to take the ideals of nationalism to the logical conclusion. Now they don’t have Left-wing extremism. Even though there’s Left-wingers that are engaging in political violence on a frequent basis, who harbour genocidal hatred. They’re allowed to take their ideas to their logical conclusion. So it’s a complete double standard! It’s a totally arbitrary standard applied ideologically just to be persecute the ideological enemies of the regime, of the current ruling class. An ideology which the majority of Australians don’t subscribe to and are actually offended by. But nevertheless because they control the levers of power and because of mass apathy and a mixture of apathy and demoralisation and disorganisation, they’re able to get away with it for now.

 

65 the System Calling Us “Extremists” to Justify Their Own Lawfare and Extremism Against Us

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. It’s why they come up with certain arbitrary terms in order to justify the sort of action that they take against dissidents such as extremists. Because lawfully extremist doesn’t mean the same as terrorists, does it? They know we’re not terrorists! They know I’m not a terrorist. They know you’re not a terrorist, as you said. The head of ASIO has publicly stated that these guys aren’t terrorists due to Senate inquiries or whatever the hell is going on there.

 

But they still need to try to justify the sort of measures that they take in order to prevent us from appealing or recruiting from the public. Appealing to or recruiting from the public, which, as I said is the whole point of counterinsurgency. So any sort of language, any sort of phraseology they can come up with to justify extreme censorship ostracism, bullying, bully tactics lawfare, all the sorts of stuff that we’ve experienced.

 

66 Blair Barred from a Tafe Course Because Minorities Might Be “Unsafe”

top

 

Like, I can’t even go to a school. I think I went to a TAFE to try to do a Cert 4. You know what happened? The course leader, after about four weeks, told me that:

 

“I had to withdraw from the course because my identity had been discovered and minority students in the classroom may be exposed to an unsafe learning environment.”

 

It’s [chuckling] like just because my name’s Blair Cottrell! That’s why I’m not allowed to go to a TAFE in Australia right now, in democracy. And they know that I’m not going to hurt anyone. They know that I don’t have a history of that kind of thing in politics. But that’s not what’s important. What’s important is how they can come up with the sort of language and phraseology to justify pushing me out of society! To make sure that I never appeal to anyone! Because my ideas are dangerous for the current system. The way the system is currently set up.

 

But yeah, it’s a system that needs to change.

 

67 Superchats

top

 

Joel Davis: Well, while you fix that microphone [Blair bumped it], I think we’ll get into the Superchats. You can send a Superchat on Rumble. I don’t think you can send them on Odysee anymore. You can send them only on Rumble or on EntropyStream dot Live slash Joel Davis.

 

Anyway, we’ve got a few here already. One from Calmius saying:

 

“Blair, what’s the story of your beanie?”

 

Blair Cottrell: It was given to me by someone I knew quite a while ago. I don’t know if it was handmade. I can’t remember. But it’s so absurd that I tend not to wear it in public. This is something that I put on, … Can you guys hear me? Okay? I had to plug my microphone back In. I knocked it off the stand. Can you hear it?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Same as before. I don’t know if it’s been picked up. Yeah.

 

But yeah, there’s not a great story behind it. It’s just an orange beanie with. What do you call this? Do you call that a pom. A pom pom? [chuckling] I don’t know what that is.

 

Yeah. But I just, I’ve stopped caring so much about how I look and so I don’t really care. I’m just wearing it because it was cold tonight. I don’t know what you want me to say. It’s just a beanie, bro.

 

Joel Davis: It’s all that deep.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Rygo Weber said:

 

“Once again, great show guys. What do you think about the Trump and Elon spat?”

 

Well, we already got into that. So you don’t really need to answer it again. If you watch the show, we discussed it for like 20 minutes. Comfy Friend said:

 

“Great show!”

 

And shout out to Comfy Friend broadcasting the show on his X. Much appreciated. Zero seven to all the Comfy Friend viewers this evening. Of course the show’s on Rumble. It’s on Odysee and back on X for now.

 

So thanks for that man. I appreciate it. He does a good job shilling our shit collectively on X with all of us banned.

 

So you can follow Comfy Friend on X to still get your dose of NSN. Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell, Tom Sewell content. Jacob Hersant content as well:

 

“You will never have children!”

 

Spiteful mutant supporter said:

 

“Capitalism has made it this way. Old fashioned fascism will take it away.”

 

68 Superchat – Left Wing and Right Wing Views on Capitalism

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I always get a little bit awkward when someone just blames everything on capitalism. It seems like an oversimplification to me. What do you think, Joel?

 

[1:58:50]

 

Joel Davis: I mean, yeah, but it’s definitely a dynamic. I mean but there’s a distinction between I think like a Left-wing and a Right-wing criticism of capitalism. So generally Left-wing criticisms of capitalism have to do with exploitation. This idea that, oh there’s all these fat cats that are making all this money at the expense of everyone. And basically the implication is that if we could just somehow like divide up the benefits more equitably that it would be okay.

 

Obviously there’s other Left-wing critiques, like you know, the idea that commodification is culturally destructive or environmentally destructive, but that they would share with like Right-wing critiques of capitalism.

 

But, a more Right-wing critique of capitalism would be double pronged. One that capitalism as a structure elevates the wrong kind of people into political leadership. So under like a feudal society where you had like an aristocracy, the selection pressures on leaders were different and we had basically warriors, men who fought with honour who passed down their titles intergenerationally and raised their children through good breeding but also through good rearing to become, to develop a kind of honour based, you know, moral code and to rule with an honour based, you know, warrior code. And therefore that created a more virtuous society.

 

Where under capitalism you have all these merchants that simply gain political power because they made a lot of money. And the attributes that make you successful in business don’t necessarily make you an honourable man and therefore you don’t have an honourable government. That’s like a Right-wing critique of capitalism.

 

Or another Right-wing critique of capitalism would be that the process of commercialisation is destructive to folkways, to culture. That when everything becomes commodified and you have this kind of global marketplace that it breaks down the local traditions and forms of identity and globalises and abstracts everything out into this like universal, into like universal individual units. And we basically lose all connection with who we really are. And as a result our moral and cultural fabric like disintegrates. I think I agree with these criticisms. And that doesn’t mean that we should, become communists, obviously! There’s a false dichotomy between capitalist and communist.

 

The alternative is not necessarily to abolish money or abolish property or something. That’s not the issue. The issue with capitalism is in that some people are rich and some people are poor. The issue are these other things. It’s about how do you create a political system that basically ensures that virtuous honourable men maintain leadership and rule and hold other elements to account that everything doesn’t get relativised in terms of “what’s good for business”. And secondarily, how do you preserve the culture of your people from being liquidated into this global marketplace? How do you stop commodification and preserve some kind of sacredness and tradition?

 

And obviously National Socialism, political ideology tries to do this,

 

69 Francis Yockey’s Description of Socialism Versus Capitalism in His Book Imperium

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Mandatory military service. You can start with that. And no one holds office without having done their military service and have achieved a certain rank perhaps. I reckon that’s a good start.

 

But I like Francis Yockey’s description of socialism versus capitalism in his book Imperium, where he basically insinuates that capitalism represents one aspect of human nature and so it’s impossible to actually eliminate it because it represents the selfish motivation which is half the reason anyone ever does anything. If you make it so people can’t actually advance their own interests, then you kill the incentive to actually do anything. Because no one wants to do anything if it’s purely just in the interests of the community and not themselves. Because as humans we have to see some sort of benefit, individual benefit in things that we do.

 

He summarises that capitalism means basically every man for himself, whereas the opposing view, socialism, the opposing economic system of socialism, is the other form of human nature, which is to do things for the advancement of the community in spite of oneself sometimes, which again can be half the reason we’re doing things at the same time. So I like that summary because it’s more personable. It sort of gets more into the nature of people and the compulsion, the motivation that goes beyond just economics and financial considerations of why people do things.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Like we talk about the problems with individualism but at the same time also value liberty. Like anyone, I think like most people, most Anglo Saxons. I don’t like excessive bureaucracy and over regulation of everything. I like for normal people to be largely left alone to their own devices, to choose their own destinies up to a level. Obviously you need to put hard limits on that. But where possible, it’s good to basically bias towards freedom and have to justify it away rather than the reverse.

 

But having said that, like liberalism as an ideological framework has been obviously disastrous for our people. So it needs to be attacked at its root. And people have to come before our individual freedom ultimately.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. I was about to say that. I think politically we need to be more socialist than we are capitalists because the more socialist you are, the more you’re considering the effect on the broader community and the future generations rather than just how you are benefiting now in the moment or how you’re affected by anything happening in the moment.

 

And obviously if you’re dealing with the future of a country, you need to be more socialist in your considerations. And that’s all socialism actually means at the end of the day is considering how anything may affect the greater ethnic community. The problem with communism though is it doesn’t really consider socialism from an ethnic perspective. It doesn’t consider the group as, …

 

Joel Davis: Universal humanity.

 

Blair Cottrell: Correct. It’s universal and it’s also class based which is just like a different form of looking at humanity on a universal basis.

 

[2:05:42]

 

70 Marx and the Destruction of Classes

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. The reason why Marx identifies the proletariat as the revolutionary subject of history is not because he wants them to stay the proletariat, but because the proletariat, the working class, is being exploited by capitalism. He sees it as the vehicle to the destruction of classes.

 

So the ideal of Marxism is to abolish class and to end in a kind of, in like a universal humanity where we’re all on the same level. Like it’s about destroying the category of bourgeoisie, entirely. It doesn’t have this like perennial mindset that there’ll always be workers versus capitalists that will go on forever. Like obviously the idealist from the Marxist standpoint is to overthrow it.

 

But, whereas I think our view from the Right because we’re realists is more that like what you were saying before, that the forces that are imbued within capitalism they’re part of human nature and that they’ll always have some kind of representation within society. And it’s about trying to get the balance right. You’re never going to be able to ultimately decide on one or the other extreme. That’s kind of irrational utopianism.

 

But instead you kind of have to just take human nature for what it is and try and balance these forces as best you can. That’s a more Right-wing perspective.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s right. That’s definitely the attitude that’s the position I would take right now based on my understanding.

 

71 Superchat: is Techno Trance and EDM the Most Aryan Music Around?

top

 

Joel Davis: Mhm. All right. Superchat Aussie Artist 88 said:

 

“Blair bro, is techno trance and EDM the most Aryan music around? It’s the natural evolution of the Germanic spirit. Fast paced and yet spiritual. What’s your opinion?”

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve never thought of it that way, but maybe that’s a really interesting perspective. I can tell you no other genre of music makes me feel what I feel when I listen to really good trance and electronic dance music. Like that stuff just invigorates me in a way that’s difficult to explain through words. So it’s very possible. I do feel like it hits me on another level. One that’s hard to express. What do you think, Joel? You’re into your music a little bit, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think, I mean the most Aryan music, I mean you’ve got classical music, you’ve got like heavy metal, all the different sub genres of metal. You’ve got electronic music. You know, they’re all different like phases in technology. Like Wagner couldn’t have started a metal band because electric guitars didn’t exist yet, you know. And then I don’t know, Slayer, I mean obviously there was like synthesisers and stuff, but they didn’t have like the apparatus that you use to make electronic music wasn’t fully developed yet and it’s produces different genres. So it’s like when Aryans are dealing with electronic instruments, they make a certain kind of music. When they’re dealing with electric instruments, they make another kind of music. When they’re dealing with pre-electric instruments, they make another kind of music. You know, that’s how I see it. I don’t think it makes sense to like try and argue, one is more airing than the other. It’s like all of them are expressions of our spirit. All of them are expressions of our racial nature.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think someone just really appreciates like trance music. I can say this. A thought occurred to me as I was listening to Joel just then that I think a lot of trance music, if you listen or pay attention to the structure of how the track develops, it’s basically, and I’m not trying to be vulgar with this is a very objective analysis. It’s how sex would sound to the soul. It’s almost like the process of sex put into audio form, if you understand what I mean. Like, I don’t know how to explain it exactly, but there’s like that build up or the process.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, kind of orgasmic quality.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. Reaching that climax point and then the climax point hits and it hits really hard. And that is the sort of pinnacle of the track. Just like that is the pinnacle of the experience that you have through sex. I think maybe that’s why it makes us feel a certain way that other music can’t really.

 

Joel Davis: But yeah, there’s an ecstatic, there’s an ecstatic quality to it. That’s what’s appealing about it. I think that ecstatic quality is can also be found in psychedelic forms of guitar based music as well.

 

But yeah, it definitely comes through. And the lines get blurred sometimes between electronic instruments and those kinds of genres as well, particularly in recent decades. Like the kind of like music that’s categorised as goth in that spectrum, for example, often blurs the lines between those categories.

 

But yeah, I enjoy all, basically all of those genres of music. I’m glad that they all exist. They all represent different emotions. Like metal is like more epic! It’s kind of like music of like war and aggression and intensity and horror and all those kinds of spectrum of emotions. And you’ve got like gothic and alternative rock genres that have kind of romantic quality to them but they also have psychedelic quality. And then electronic music is like m can often be more ecstatic! Yeah.

 

[2:11:05]

 

72 Music Can “Spell” Us in the Same Way as a Good Speech

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Isn’t it true that music can spell us in the same way that a good speech can? It’s a similar type of magic or has a similar type of effects on people. And I realised that young.

 

And one of my secrets when I was learning about public speaking was I used to study certain songs that would make me feel a certain way. And I thought:

 

“Wow, maybe I can create a speech or practise roughly the way I can deliver a speech, or a method through which I can deliver a speech where I can incorporate the same melody, or a similar melody to what I’m hearing in this song and put that melody into the words I’m speaking.”

 

So I think, there’s something to be said about that and there’s probably some sort of underground science where you can get into that and study it. I didn’t really get into anything underground but I just made the connection as a result of my own, you know, learning when I was a bit younger.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well music is the language of the soul. You know, it has like the ability to say things that words can’t. Or maybe words can say it but they can’t really convey it in the same way that that music can because it’s more, viscerally emotive.

 

This is why I think like Schopenhauer’s view on music is utterly retarded! Because for Schopenhauer music was supposed to be like a method by which we could disconnect, from like the life force and disconnect from like the drives and will embedded in the body and achieve some kind of like mystical, you know, disinterested union with the absolute or whatever. And I find generally what’s great about music is precisely the opposite. That music is the life force made manifest in its most potent form. I guess on that side I would side with Nietzsche against Schopenhauer*.

 

[*Nietzsche criticised Schopenhauer’s pessimistic view of life and suffering, advocating instead for an artistic and affirmative approach to existence. He believed that embracing suffering could lead to personal growth and strength, contrasting with Schopenhauer’s call for resignation and detachment from desires.]

 

73 Sargon of Akkad Having an Event in Australia

top

 

But yeah, anyway, Skinhead Friend said:

 

“Have you seen Tom Roussell, also known as Survive the Jive and Sargoy of Akkad are speaking in Australia later this year. Sargoy is getting more based lately and Survive the Jive has always been solid.”

 

Yeah, I did see that. There is an event. I think they’re almost sold out. They only had 100 tickets for sale and they were selling them for like a thousand bucks each or something. So meant to be like an exclusive event.

 

Blair Cottrell: Isn’t it Sargon of Akkad. Why is he Sargoy of Akkad?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, that’s obviously a joke. Yeah, people used to call him Sargoy of Mossad well back in the day. Sargoy of Mossad. It’s pretty funny.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why is he called that though? Is it speculated, has he been accused?

 

Joel Davis: Well, back in the day, lately he has been better. But back in the day he was a big defender of classical liberalism. He always get into debates with people from the so-called Alt-Right. There was one really famous debate that he had with Richard Spencer back in the day, like 2018 era, something like that. Maybe 2017. I can’t remember the exact year, but it was back in that era. And, yeah, he was kind on the other side of the fence.

 

Whereas lately he’s kind of come more around. Not all the way, but he’s come a lot closer to like defending ethno-nationalism. Like he’ll defend ethno-nationalism like 90% now.

 

So yeah, I don’t think that he’s like an agent of the jews or something. I think he’s just a temperamental conservative. He’s a bit cucked because he’s just a temperamental conservative. But some of the people that he platforms on his Lotus Eater podcast platform that he runs, some of them aren’t bad, some of them kind of suck. Some of them are pretty good. Young, kind of like blonde Aryan English guys who are obviously our guys. A few of them, I won’t name names but you know, had some good interactions with some of them on Twitter over the years before I was banned.

 

So yeah, I don’t have anything against him. He seems like a nice guy. I think he I think his heart’s in the right place, but he’s just a little bit cucked, obviously, for my liking, but he’s all right.

 

As for Survive the Jive, he does good stuff. I’ve always enjoyed his YouTube channel. Have you ever seen his YouTube videos? He talks a lot about you know, Anglo and Germanic and Nordic history and ancient Paganism, things like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: A little bit. Yeah. A little bit. I was gonna say that. Seems like the boys have been successful on the bullying front with a Sargoy of Akkad. [chuckling] You know, with all the names and the pressure. It’s funny to see stuff like that build on some content creators and influencers who are obviously very in love. Not in love they’re very attached to their online Persona, whatever it is that they’ve created for themselves. They’ve managed to dodge the censorship and try to be reasonable or whatever, but through just chipping away through effective bully measures, the boys just managed to shove them in the right direction, gradually!

 

Joel Davis: I saw people complaining that they got banned from my Telegram chat. Look, I got a lot of moderators. It probably wasn’t me, but I’ll tell you this. If you send a Superchat with your Telegram app, I’ll unban it. That’s the deal. It’s a guarantee you can buy your way back in!

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel!

 

Joel Davis: There you go.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m surprised. I didn’t think Joel would be so easily sway with money.

 

[2:16:20]

 

Joel Davis: But if you post garbage, you might get banned again. So watch yourself. It doesn’t guarantee you a permanent residency, but you can buy a second chance. At The Joel and Blair Show, we believe in second chances.

 

Soul Vinda said:

 

“Amazing aesthetics on that NSN edit. This is the spirit that will win over the motivated youth.”

 

Yeah, it was a sick edit. I think it might have been Gus who made it. I don’t know who made it, but I’m feeling it was Gus. Yeah, but it was a sick edit. Did you like it? Were you just blowing smoke up its arse because it was on the show? Be honest. Do you think it sucks?

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, no man! Did you see me dancing to it? That was shit was hype! Loved it. If it was Gus that made it, salute, bro! Excellent work! Some of these young guys are great on the edits. Yeah. I wouldn’t even know how they do it, to be honest. I used to think I was pretty good at editing and I can edit, like, videos, basic edits, but I wouldn’t even know how to produce shit like that these days. So it’s good stuff. It’s impressive.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t do that you should know me better than that. I don’t blow smoke up people’s asses. If you’re hearing me say something nice, it’s genuine, man! I don’t throw around false compliments. I always just try to find something about people I can appreciate. So that’s why sometimes I can come across as probably too nice. But no, yeah, I really did like the video.

 

74 Getting Around Censorship with Uploading Clips, Edits

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I think Anderson puts out cool, cool edits. And yeah, that’s what you need.

 

By the way, those of you who are on TikTok, Instagram, whatever, Twitter, re-upload the edits and go find the old ones as well and spam them out there. Obviously we want you uploading clips from the show as well and other things, but get those hyper edits out there. Get, get some eyes on them! Put them particularly on places like TikTok and Instagram, where they’re gonna have more chance of going viral.

 

We’re just talking about censorship before. The main reason that we can get around censorship is part of it is through being provocative and interesting. But another massive component of it is you guys. You guys that are re-uploading content, clipping content, things like that, to make sure that even though we’re banned, the content lives on.

 

So I appreciate it. It’s one way that you can help the movement. Very easy way to help the movement is simply that.

 

Crafty Boom said:

 

“Lead the way, men. Let’s go!”

 

And Testy Testerson said:

 

“Buy a few beers on me.”

 

I see also on Entropy, Deer in the Headlights said:

 

“Carry on, gentlemen, you’re doing great work!”

 

And Shovelhead Amy said:

 

“Thanks for what you’re doing. From an avid listener here in Antario, Canada. People are paying attention.”

 

I should have said Ontario, sorry.

 

75 On Canadians and Australians

top

 

Blair Cottrell: What is with Canadians? Why do we vibe so hard with Canadians? What’s going on there? I think we’ve covered this on last couple of shows. I just keep seeing Canadians pop up all the time. And my heart goes out to Canada. They seem to be going through similar struggles and we seem to have, I don’t know, some sort of similarity between us Aussies and Canadians. They appreciate us and I appreciate them. So thanks, Canada. Thanks for watching.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but she said:

 

“From a true toque lover. Those are great toques.”

 

I wonder what a fucking “toque” is?:

 

“The consistency and level headedness that you men display is what people are Sorely craving. And I find it amusing that you call them beanies. It’s a toque. Toque is what we call them.”

 

Yeah, well we’re not fucking Canadians, so we call them beanies.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know what I thought? Toke, man! You know what I thought toke, meant? I thought it was a take, but it was like a take from someone that was like high on something.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, you give a bong head. Like “give us a toke”, that kind of thing. Yeah, no, we love Canadians. Canadians are kind of like nice versions of us. I think. They’re like, if Australians were nice.

 

Blair Cottrell: But the fact Canadians like us shows that perhaps they feel, I don’t know, there’s some deep appreciation for our nature and humour. So maybe they’re not as nice as they ostensibly seem or have a reputation for being. Maybe they have this like contained, …

 

Joel Davis: Unless they’re French-Canadians, they’re from the same stock. So I think they just kind of, they kind of understand us. They can, they have a similar national story. They come from the same root populations and so because of that ethnic connection, I think they can kind of understand where Australians are coming from, generally.

 

Blair Cottrell: Would you agree they’re very sensible people. Canadians always seem to be well spoken, I mean it’s not always going to be the case. It’s going to be outliers. But all the Canadians that I know of, they’re well spoken, presentable, sensible, intelligent people. They’re always easy to respect.

 

76 Canadians and Scandinavians Are Too “Nice”. It’s Time to Get Savage

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, you’ve kind of blown smoke up their arse a little bit now. They’re all right, they’re okay. They’re ookayy! Or whatever the fuck they say. I wish Canadians said “cunt” more! That’s my main critique of Canadians. I think there’s not enough vulgarity, not enough aggression. They’re too nice! It offends me as an Australian a little bit.

 

You know you see them, they got ice hockey going on, an aggressive national sport. If you look at their history, they’ve been great, they’ve got an incredible military history. They’re savages in their military history. Great, great victories in battle over the decades. So they’re obviously like, tough.

 

So I feel like they’re almost too nice. They’re kind of, almost like they let themselves be taken advantage of its like the great shame. Like it’s similar with Scandinavians, Scandinavians are so nice. And it’s a beautiful thing because that makes for a great society because if they’re living in a society full of their own kin, that pleasant nature, is fantastic!

 

But then under the current situation, it’s like, time to get mean! It’s time to get savage!

 

[2:22:57]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, we must glorify hostility to outsiders. Hostility to outsiders must become a noble virtue, one expected of all of our kin.

 

Joel Davis: Mhm. Yes, it’s time to get mean Canadians! But Australia, I mean our issue is not so much that we’re too nice, it’s more that we’re too apathetic. We don’t care enough. That’s our problem, I think.

 

77 Superchat – Tips for Educating the Ladies on Our Politics?

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Too cynical as well. Most Aussies think:

 

“It’s all going to go to shit anyway. And yeah nothing ever changes, so why bother?”

 

There’s a bit of cynicism there. But Aaron, 32, just sent through 10 bucks and he asked an interesting question. Joel, he asks:

 

“Any tips for educating the ladies on our politics? HH!”

 

I’m of the opinion you can’t really or shouldn’t bother too much. How should I phrase this? I found there’s no real use ranting about politics or trying to educate any woman on your political views. I mean, you can talk to a woman about politics if she really wants to talk about that. But generally speaking, it’s better to just lead by example. It’s better to take care of yourself, demonstrate that you can take care of yourself, be in good health, be smart, be able to provide something of value to the woman that she can see value in. I don’t know, it’s like I’ve never really seen much point in talking to women about politics, put it that way. It’s like not something that I’ve done a great deal because I see that they’re just not that interested. They’re usually interested in talking about other things.

 

And I talk about, think about politics all the time. It’s like I’m always inside my own head about it. And I network with and deal with people for political purposes all the time as well. It’s probably my primary interest still in life. And so at the end of the day, I don’t want to go home and sit with my girlfriend and talk about politics as well. I want to remove myself from that world. And I see women as being kind of outside of the world of politics. Almost like a period of relief from politics. That’s how I feel about it. What do you reckon?

 

Joel Davis: Personally, I never stop talking about the subjects that matter to me. So women are subjected to those same subjects. And usually if a woman likes me, then they want to hear about it anyway because they just kind of like hearing you mansplain. But it’s a distinction, I guess, between talking to women who don’t already like, want to have sex with you or are having sex with you, and talking like general women in the community. Because if a woman is into you, then she’ll just kind of go along like she’s probably go along with having a discussion about whatever you want to talk about because obviously you’ve got a close relationship. So I don’t think you really need advice on that. Just like, just talk about what you think.

 

But when it comes to general women, like out in the community, I think women respond better to putting things in the language of care. So talk about you know, talk about kind of like the Righteous reasons why certain people you care about are getting fucking over. Whether it be your family’s future, whether it be victims of immigrant crime, whatever, White people collectively, whatever. And talk about how you care about these groups and how that’s what motivates you and so on. I think that can bring you come across a lot more sympathetically and I think put it to them. If they challenge you, say:

 

“What about what this person has suffered? Or what about this group of people? Don’t they deserve this? Don’t they deserve that?”

 

Usually this kind of framing is more persuasive, I think, to the feminine psyche. Because the feminine psyche processes, you know, social realities more through that prism than maybe how you would talk about it with men. So I don’t know. That’s based my basic take. I mean, it’s kind of obvious, right? But it’s true.

 

Blair Cottrell: A woman just needs to be ethnically aware. Ethnically aware is kind of like bare minimum. If a woman is not ethnically aware, at least, it’s like I can’t even be bothered. I can’t be bothered even having a conversation with her about anything. Because women should have good instincts. It’s of the female nature to be in tune with one’s instinct rather than be intellectualising everything and being sort of consciously processing what they’re observing through their senses. Women are very instinctual creatures. And if a woman can’t even be in touch with their own ethnic identity. If she can’t even acknowledge it or feel connected to that, then it’s like too far gone, man! [chuckling] I just can’t deal with that.

 

Joel Davis: So I think women are also receptive to when, if you talk about like the issues with race mixing and like the desire to have children that, maintain your ancestry and that have certain traits that you have or that your family has, …

 

[2:28:21]

 

Blair Cottrell: Even the anti-racist ones, even the woman women who masquerade as anti-racists, as soon as you bring up the inheritance of certain ethnic traits that they possess, like they’re always very interested in children looking like them. Usually they’re interested in passing on their blue eyes or their blond hair. They want to do that! Which just goes to show their instinct always trumps whatever they say they believe, which is what I was trying to get at before. The words women speak is never as powerful or as effective or influential over their actions as their instinct.

 

78 Superchat – My Lefty Girlfriend Told Me That She Hates Jews

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I mean that’s definitely the case.

 

Anyway, Rigo Weber said:

 

“I just told my girlfriend that I’m currently looking into the true history of Hitler and the jews. And to my surprise, she told me that she hates jews. I found this surprising. And she’s always been a real Lefty.”

 

Well it’s not that surprising that Lefties are developing anti-semitic attitudes. I mean, generally Lefties they hate Israel. If they hate capitalism, they probably have noticed that a lot of these capitalists are jewish. There’s something jewish about capitalism, about international finance, etc.

 

So yeah, there’s certain demographics of people where it’s easier to talk to them about jews than it is to talk to them about race. And there’s other demographics where it’s easier to talk to them about race than about jews. And usually people that are more conservative, it’s easier to get to talk to them about race than it is about jews. And it’s easier inverse of people that are more of a Left-wing bias.

 

So yeah, that doesn’t surprise me. But yeah, I mean, if it’s your girlfriend, she’s gonna, even if she doesn’t agree with you, she’s gonna be open with you and like, she’s gonna trust you enough to say things that she wouldn’t say in polite company. Or she’ll like, hear you out, obviously, so you can be a lot more frank. You shouldn’t be afraid of being able to talk about how you really feel with your own girlfriend. That’s kind of fucked up!

 

79 Blair and Joel’s Interactions with Women

top

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve never known a girl who’s like, strongly disagreed with me on anything. I’ve never been in an interaction with a female where we’ve argued about something like some social ideal, political idea, philosophy, nothing! I think when women like you, they tend to be more accepting of whatever it is you’re saying. They mimic your ideas. It’s always been really difficult for me to actually argue with a woman. I don’t even want to! Maybe that’s why. I don’t know.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I don’t know. I think usually I’ve always dated women who have similar political proclivities. Like, may not be like full Nazis or whatever, but they’ve always been pretty, like, Right-wing and so haven’t been offended by my views on things and then being exposed to me. Anyone who’s exposed to me on a long enough timeline basically becomes a Nazi.

 

So, yeah, whether I’m having sex or not.

 

Blair Cottrell: Have you ever just asked people basic questions and watch them become frustrated by actually thinking about the answer to your question and realising how stupid it sounds?

 

Like, for example, you might be talking to some girl and she’s trying to tell you about how climate change is going to destroy the world or something. And you’ll ask her a simple question like:

 

“Okay, where did you get that information?”

 

And she’d be like:

 

“Oh, well, I was in university and this, like Professor told me.”

 

Or as part of some course or something like that. Okay:

 

“Well, where did that information come from, though? Where did they get it from?”

 

And they don’t actually, a lot of the time, like, as you just develop that line of questioning they get frustrated because they realise that it’s actually unreasonable to believe what they believe based on the sources that have, like, pass down that information to them because they can’t actually verify the sources. And by just asking them to explore those sources for a moment, they become visibly frustrated. Have you experienced that?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Like, so usually what has happened when I’ve been in social situations where there’s like, Leftist women, is they just kind of like start crying and then go to the bathroom or something. Or just basically act like as if I just did this horrible thing to them and then try and like act like a victim and then hope that someone like cucks out and sympathises with them because they’re not equipped to actually engage me in debate or critical discussion. That’s pretty much what happens every single time. So I think I have intimidating aura when it comes to debating. People don’t really like debating me.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh yeah! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: I don’t get people who are like political to debate me at this point. Like no one wants to debate me, so.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, everyone has their strengths and yours is arguing a point. And you know any person in touch with some semblance of common sense knows that there are some armies not to engage, there are some battles not to fight.

 

And one of the battles not to fight in my opinion is entering into open debate with Joel Davis! [chuckling] Yeah, everyone’s good at something.

 

Joel Davis: Anyway, we’ve been going for two and a half hours.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah.

 

80 Update on Tom Sewell’s Court Case – Prosecution Will Drop Case If Doesn’t Claim Legal Fees

top

 

Joel Davis: I hope everyone enjoyed the show. Like I said, Monday night our time late Monday night I’ll do a one off stream with Thomas777. By the way, update. Tom Sewell he had caught this week on Thursday another pre-trial conference, and it got basically adjourned for another week. Because basically what happened is that the prosecution offered to drop the charges against Tom if he wouldn’t pursue them for legal costs. So they were like we wouldn’t want to pay your lawyer fees for all us dicking you around for the last four months but we’re willing to drop the charge. Meaning like obviously he didn’t do it. And, he was like:

 

“No, you’re going to pay my legal fees, or you can’t like drop the charge, make me pay lawyer fees and then not front up for it.”

 

And so now the prosecution needs another week apparently to figure out whether it wants to pay his legal fees or not so what a joke, the legal process can be! But hopefully that resolves itself soon and we’ll have Tom on the show again soon.

 

81 Jacob Hersant Has Court Re Appealing His Roman Salute Sentence

top

 

Also Jacob Hersant has court this week. I can’t remember which day. Do you remember the dates?

 

[2:35:41]

 

Blair Cottrell: What dates?

 

Joel Davis: Hersant has court next week.

 

Blair Cottrell: I thought you were going to say has “caught something”. Not has like “court”, legal.

 

Joel Davis: No, no, no, no! He was sentenced to one month in prison for the Roman salute but then appealed it to the county court. The county court is going to conduct the trial this coming week.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know.

 

Joel Davis: I think it might come on the 10th, but we’ll update you.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know, you’ll have to ask him.

 

Joel Davis: I’m going to go down there, at least one of the days, it’s like a three day trial, so I’m probably not going to sit through all three days of the trial. But I’m going to go down there and suss out what’s going on and give Jacob some support. And, we’ll cover it and we’ll report to you what’s happening. So that should be interesting if he wins or not. Obviously it’s a constitutional case as well. So that makes it doubly interesting. It’s challenging the Constitutionality of the act itself.

 

So that’s all happening this week. So there’s going to be some interesting kind of legal wranglings through next week for Tom and Jacob. And we’ll, yeah, probably cover that next week on the show. Plus whatever else is going down. There’s always something interesting. It never stops.

 

Thank God! We continuously make news because there really isn’t that much news in Australian politics.

 

Blair Cottrell: You imagine how boring, …

 

Joel Davis: Imagine if we had to log in and talk about how:

 

“Oh, Gerard Rennick was talking shit about Pauline Hanson on Twitter this week. Oh, wow!”

 

Blair Cottrell: How boring would Australian politics be if there was no NSN [National Socialist Network]? There’s been nothing happening! You just have your Sky News shills. I don’t even want to imagine it. I’m thankful for the current political situation, for you guys doing what you do. It makes things very interesting. Keeps pushing boundaries, which I’ve always been sympathetic to that kind of activity. Yeah.

 

Thanks for joining us guys. It’s been a cosy night. It’s been a good stream. We’ve gone for a little longer than we usually do, and I guess we’ll see you guys next week, right?

 

Is there anything else, Joel, before we finish up?

 

82 On the Physical Characteristics of Some Nationalists

top

 

Joel Davis: No. I see people are arguing in the chat. Megawatts says:

 

“I’m 190 centimetres built built beast. But I don’t seem like it from the face.”

 

But then Skinhead Friend said:

 

“I’m only three metres tall. So it’s like the opposite of an Anglo king you see, on the battlefield, Joel is taller IRL than in lore.”

 

Anyway, it’s kind of humourous, it’s ambiguous.

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel’s this weird blend between nerd and Chad, I don’t know, he’s like multifaceted, personality. But you get some of those. I’ve always noticed that whenever you get, any sort of character in politics which becomes prominent for whatever reason, they sometimes a blend of several different stereotypes. They never kind of, they’re never one dimensional and there’s something to be said for that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I feel like most, it’s interesting too. Like most nationalists, prominent nationalists are usually pretty tall. Like Keith Woods is like six-five. You’re like six-four. I know Ferryman from Canada is like six-four. Hersant and myself are pretty tall. We’re over six, well over six foot. Tom Sewell’s the only prominent [chuckling] I could think of actually he’s under six foot, but he makes up for it because he could probably bash all of us! So that’s the thing, like you know.

 

Blair Cottrell: Everyone thinks Tom’s short.

 

Joel Davis: But it’s just like all these mates are too tall! It’s just kind of not fair really. He’s like normal size.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s one of the things. But he also has like it’s the way he’s built because he’s so compact and like square built, strong shoulders, strong legs and shit! I think because he has the long torso, like if Tom and I sit next to each other, he literally looks taller than me because he’s got like a long torso and he sits upright, he’s got good posture. Whereas I slouch and all my height is in my legs. If I sit down I look shorter than him. So it’s a weird sort of aesthetic thing where, …

 

Joel Davis: He’s not such a good squat because he’s got those squatter’s legs.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, he’s got like the most perfect squat I’ve ever seen! So I don’t know, everyone’s got their strengths.

 

But yeah, I suppose we’ll see you guys next week. We’ll wrap it up there. I need to go to the bathroom.

 

Joel Davis: White power! Blood and honour! Hail Hitler! It’s all happening.

 

Blair Cottrell: See you guys.

 

 

[2:40:27]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/15/2025 = 43)

johnnyboy2324
Supporter
3 days ago
the succulent meal guy, recently did an interview and admitted that he was robbing safes. he just got out of prison
0 likes

Report
ArchipelagoWoes
Supporter+
4 days ago
I know a couple Davis’s here in Pennsylvania. Good people
0 likes

Report
MrAnglo
Supporter
5 days ago
Never Compromise and Cuck. That is your Tactic. End of Discussion.
0 likes

Report
katana17
5 days ago
[Joel Davis – Tactical N-Word – Jun 6, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/06/08/joel-davis-tactical-n-word-jun-6-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss the tactical use of the N-word as used by NSN members in Melbourne with their Ban Niggers Not Machetes banner drop in front of a major shopping centre where Sudanese had engaged in a machete fight. See Table of Contents for points discussed. – KATANA]
01 Clip of Trump Using the N-Word
02 Trump vs Musk Feud
03 Clip of NSN Rally in Melbourne – Ban Niggers Not Machetes
04 Tactical Use of the N-Word, Pros and Cons
05 Why the Fuck Are There Africans in Australia!
06 Whites created the problems in the rest of the world through our expansionism and colonialism?
07 How Irish are you? Joel and Blair’s ancestry
08 DNA labs selling your data to interested parties
09 History of the name Davis
10 Davises in the US had slaves resulting in niggers having the name!
11 Whites, jews, blacks and the slave trade
12 Instagram and the very positive response to the Ban Niggers Not Machetes action
13 Discussion on the Effective Use of the N-Word and Media Response
14 Sudanese in Pakenham Attacking White High School Kids at Party
15 Machete Fight at Northland Shopping Centre
16 Magistrates in Victoria Are Being Trained in Diversity and Inclusion to Go Easy on Immigrants
17 The Problem of Anti-Racism Being Championed by Whites
(Cont’d)
[TRANSCRIPT – Words: 27,900 – Duration: 160 mins]
0 likes

FJB6666
5 days ago
Joel looks like a Sikh pajeet with that black beeny on.
0 likes

Report
cowolf
6 days ago
Speaking about the tactics. (I don’t know if you guys even read the comments here, never seen any response.) Sorry but I think you have to get rid of Hitler connotation (images, symbols, at least modify Roman salute), and this is from the supporter of the White cause, an European here. I haven’t seen any honest analysis of what Hitler actually did wrong. I mean, you have literally unlimited amount of material condemning Hitler and making him the greatest villain of all time (which he wasn’t, probably Stalin was) but it all comes from the Hitler’s enemies, it all comes from the WWII winners. What I want to hear is a reflection on Hitler’s mistakes from the Hitler’s supporters. And that is pretty obvious that you can’t go anywhere if you don’t know what went wrong in the first place and don’t want to repeat the mistakes. I watched the whole 12 hours of ‘Europa The Last Battle’ and while it is quite interesting there’s not a single word on what went wrong and why. For most of the countries of anti-German coalition of WWII Hitler will never be acceptable. You may not care that much but that’d be already the first problem: Whites need to learn how to make allies and how to support each other. So first of all, Hitler was not pro-White, he was only pro-German. That’s why he cannot be a unifying figure for all Whites. Every country Hitler attacked was at the time 100% White and nearly 100% Christian. Basically Germany didn’t kill a single non-white during the whole war, it was all White genocide. And tell me how can you blame everything on Jews then make ally with Soviet Union and bomb, burn and loot Poland? The biggest mistake Hitler did was to attack Poland, then it all went downhill. I am happy to hear any constructive opinions.
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
CreateAnArmyToSaveWhites
6 days ago
I don’t know if it helps but WW2 was mostly about weakening Europe to then strengthen and later weaken the United States (ending segregation, making racism illegal, mass immigration, etc). Hitler could have kept his country on par with the United States without engaging in any war and could have kept his country purely white (if you consider the brown eye’d people white) but he didn’t. He decided to put it in harm’s way by attacking the entire White world FOR ABSOLUTELY NO REASON. Hitler’s people weren’t on the verge of becoming minorities like they are now.. (THANKS TO HITLER) You’d have to be foolish as hell to think Hitler cared about White people or Germany. You’d also have to be pretty dim to think Hitler didn’t massively assist the Jews with his rhetoric and acts against them. Israel was created not long after WW2. Any criticism of Jews or nonwhites in general is the most perceived evil thing anyone can do now thanks to Hitler. Whereas before, it was nothing but common sense to criticize and to attack one’s enemy. I also don’t think Stalin is as evil as Hitler because Stalin didn’t make White people evil by being racist and losing a war. Good luck in life fellow white.
1 like

Report
johnnyboy2324
Supporter
3 days ago
optics cuck. stop being a pussy.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
cowolf
3 days ago
I asked specifically for ‘constructive opinions’ so get lost and stop being a low IQ retard.
0 likes

Report
BeornBeorning
6 days ago
Blair was talking about my brown college room mate. White people are stupid suckers handing out freebies to him.
0 likes

Report
predatorstomperrr
6 days ago
I’m an American white man and all my friends watch you while we watch ufc. Love you Joel! Don’t ever stop we cna win
0 likes

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
The parks r inaccessible BC we r all destined to 15 mins Eutopean cities where you will own nothing & be happy. If you leave more than you r allowed you will pay for it.
0 likes

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
When I worked with Redskins the conclusion I came to was they are embarrassed of their past. I saw more racism in nons all my life. Whites are hated BC they ARE superior.
1 like

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
Who owns Ayers Rock?
0 likes

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
Who misses military style education system? It’s the I’m ok ur ok bs ruining & satanizing society.
1 like

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
Just bought a cemetery plot where my great grandparents/grandparents/mother/sister are buried. All Catholics are buried there but BC the cemetery was turned over to township with woke employees it’s now a free for all like the ppl buried there have been excommunicated or something. My ancestors were the ones who had to hike in 10miles of bush with bags of flour on their backs to create farmland, roads & not mudhuts. Do you guys not know the PCR tests of last 4 yrs was taking everyone’s DNA to assess mRNA jabs while causing brain damage.
0 likes

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
The guys I follow are bent on dead weight lifting. I have a bunch of dead weights as friends. Lol Do you want them to lift BC I think it’s not being able to lift it’s about endurance. I was blessed to have the company of big strong guys on a 20km hike to have them barfing their under duress guts out all stressed/burnt out having the priest yelling “Just put one foot in front of the other” trying to avoid airlift out. I was 65 yo & could have redid the hike. Heard yrs later how it took a bunch of younger kids 3 days & 2 camping nites to do it. Lol. And boomers get constant lashings. I guess some yuppy boomers deserve it.
1 like

Report
Sinceresniper
6 days ago
Cottrell’s are also Jewish without being disrespectful to Blair.
0 likes

Report
Sinceresniper
6 days ago
The Normans fought a bigger battle in Durres Albania in 1081 against the Eastern Roman empire so Norman’s decendants are there also.
0 likes

Report
Nekropiate
6 days ago
Total support from the states!
0 likes

Report
Nekropiate
6 days ago
Total support from the states! WPWW o/ Hail Victory!
0 likes

Report
newgerman
6 days ago
ban nz not machetes…says it all in four words AAAAA+++++++
0 likes

Report
basedrespillzeus22
6 days ago
Great stream lads
0 likes

Report
GhostDogMan
Supporter++
1 week ago
lol. You guys are in Winter!! I just remember you are our Polar opposite brethren!
3 likes

Report
A655321
1 week ago
Blair, you don’t live in a traditional democracy anymore do you… Like my country you in a “Liberal democracy,” which exists to constrain the majority, turning the state into a referee for protected classes and global norms, rather than an instrument of national will. The government could care less if we are all replaced.
4 likes

Report
palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
Pakenham was a beautiful area back in the Australian days. Ironically, it was a place the youth of old Melbourne would run to for sporting fun on the weekends.
1 like

Report
palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
I wanna hear from the banner offended as their spleen is ruptured by a multiculturally enriched machete thrust.
1 like

Report
akdjfhgpjksdnkjnsdfg
1 week ago
I want to hear the NSN policies on the Covid jew-juice. Materialistic Jew-Pharma is going to ethnically cleanse us all, and a lot of people are angry and activated by the government policies. There is no pushback/accountability.
-1 likes

Report
mrwordsworth
1 week ago
it’s pronounced took
0 likes

Report
1488Brother
1 week ago
Yo four ads is crazy before I can get to a tactical N word.
0 likes

Report
Motion937
1 week ago
It isn’t a damn machete crisis. It is a niggerdom crisis. I need my machetes for clearing brush. I don’t need the negroes/Muslims. They provide no value to anyone.
21 likes

Report
Kroninn
Supporter
1 week ago
Exactly, Blair. Heat is for browns.
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 week ago
TIL “caught” and “court” are homophones in Australian English. W North American English for clarity.
0 likes

Report
palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
Trump/Elon distraction from real issue? – Mass surveillance/ PALANTIR Trump bill measures; https://youtu.be/Fg1JZDIconk?si=BGA8h
-1 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
ProvingNihil
1 week ago
Yeah my Nationalist account on IG was banned, hell also I was private.
1 like

Report
evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 week ago
TIL about KIN-dness.
-1 likes

Report
BlueNorth88
1 week ago
About censorship also, it can give content creators a kind of glamour. Look how Tommy and others milk it to death when it happens. Also the guys that follow to any smaller platform and remain loyal are true followers.
1 like

Report
EarthlingCarl
1 week ago
Blacks in London, Detroit and now Melbourne, all with the same result. Almost like race is the problem and Magic Soil is a myth.
11 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
EarthlingCarl
1 week ago
Why has Blair got a tea cosy on his head? lol
4 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
Otoya_Yamaguchi_G00k
1 week ago
Australia was invented and built by Europeans for Europeans only. https://odysee.com/@joeldavis:0/the-white-australia-policy-%28feat.:6
9 likes

Report
katana17
1 week ago
[Joel Davis – Symbolic Victory – May 30, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/06/02/joel-davis-symbolic-victory-may-30-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss the following: 1. The show is resuming after a break, with the hosts discussing recent events.
2. Joel Davis mentions no longer having “onerous bail conditions”.
3. They discuss weightlifting and an upcoming competition.
4. Joel aims for a 220kg deadlift: “That’s my ideal. If I can hit 220 at nationals, I’ll be ecstatic!”
5. They discuss the challenges of heavy lifting and potential injuries.
6. They talk about a recent court appearance in Adelaide.
7. Joel describes interactions with journalists: “And these journalists, they’re all women. Sometimes in Melbourne, you get these really, like, soy, Lefty, ugly journalists.”
8. They discuss how charges against them are being dropped.
9. Joel criticises the police: “The South Australia Police are a bunch of scumbags!”
10. They discuss African gang violence in Australia.
11. Joel says: “Basically the only thing holding together our society right now is White guys who train because police don’t actually do anything at this point.”
12. They discuss the concept of “Anarcho Tyranny”.
13. Joel talks about attending an event at New South Wales Parliament.
14. They discuss the concept of Universal vs. Particular in philosophy and politics.
15. Joel says: “Until we can go back and say what the Nazi, like the kind of so-called “Nazi” coded what they asserted, that a particular nation can just be itself and assert itself on its own terms.”
16. They discuss the importance of asserting White Identity.
17. Joel criticises the Right-wing for constantly “cucking” to the morality of their enemies. (Cont’d)
1 like

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and welcome to Patriotic Weekly Review, episode number 276, I’m live tonight. I say I because my guest has not arrived yet. He’s informed me he’s running a couple of minutes late, but he will be here shortly. But at the moment, it is me alone and I am live on Odysee. I’m live on Dlive. I’m live on Rumble and I’m live on Entropy.

 

Now, as always, you know how difficult it is for me to get the word out about these shows. I’m de-platformed on Twitter, on Facebook, on Instagram, on all mainstream social networks.

 

So if you can, please do share this show, because I’m sure when my guest arrives tonight, it’s going to be a fantastic show. It always is when I’m joined by Woodlander. Something to look forward to.

 

Now, I do have some bad news. I’ve been promising a review of Europa: The Last Battle for two months. Last month we had somebody who was ill, and this month somebody’s way on holiday.

 

So that’s going to have to be postponed again, unfortunately, to October. So I’m sorry for people who are looking forward to that, this weekend. However, it will still be happening. I’m certainly not giving up on the idea. I didn’t sit through nearly 13 hours for nothing! And it is an excellent documentary. So it is something we are absolutely going to be doing. And I apologise to people who were looking forward to that.

 

Now, I will be back on Friday, and on Friday I do have a special video. Now I’m doing a video all about the new laws that are coming in. So Yvette Cooper has announced a “Hundred Day Sprint”, whatever that means, to identify extremism and ways to target extremism. And I’ve picked apart her statement and broken down the likely changes in the law and the way those will be implemented in order to take away our freedom of speech. I think we’re moving rapidly in Britain towards a surveillance Police State. And the kind of surveillance Police State where the government basically take away many of our protections and drop the threshold for what will be known as “incitement” for material that’s likely to incite hate, whereas before it was something like “incitement to racial hatred”.

 

But I explained it all in the video, and that’s going to be out at 01:00 pm on Friday, as always. So look forward to that. And please do remember, I always have a video out every week. I’ve done that since 2016. I’ve been very consistent in doing that. And last week’s video Protesters Jailed Paedophiles Walk Free is still available, will always be available, and remember, they’re always free. There’s no paywall.

 

Now if you want to support my work, if you want to support the show, please do consider a small donation. You can donate by Entropy, Odysee. They are the ways to do it live on stream. Obviously I will read out in the second hour of the show any paid donation, whether it’s a statement, or a question, and I will answer that along with my guest. He has just informed me he is entering his house now and setting up his computer, so he will be with us shortly, but we will answer any questions in the second half of the show.

 

Obviously, I realise not everyone can donate live during the show, as not everyone who watches the show watches live. You can also donate if you’re watching it on replay, and if you want to, you can donate via crypto-currencies. All the crypto links are down in the description of the video below, whether you’re watching live or you’re watching on replay. So you can see those on Rumble, Odysee and over on BitChute where the replay will be uploaded immediately after the show.

 

Finally, if you want to write to me, if you want to contact me please do at mark@thefallofwesternman.com. That’s my email address. And my website, www.thefallofwesternman.com is where you can get my book. Now you can buy a hardback, you can buy a regular soft cover, or if you want, you can download it for free as a PDF. So even my book is available for free.

 

So please do consider giving something, whether it is a small donation, something like $3, $5, $10. If everyone chipped in who is watching live, we would be the best funded movement on the planet. So please do consider that.

 

Now, before my guest arrives, I do have some news. Now, as we know, there has been over a thousand people arrested due to the anti-migrant protests that took place after the murders that happened in Southport. Those anti-migrant protests, some of them did end in disorder, and there have been a number of people arrested.

 

Now, the sentences being handed down are absolutely scandalous! You’re seeing sentences being handed out to 18 year old lads of 20 months for kicking a police van. I mean, I’ve never seen anything like it. And if you’ve been watching my social media, I’ve been comparing and contrasting these sentences with the sentences that BLM rioters got.

 

So there’s a greater comparison. A young black lad, he tried to set fire to one of the union flags at our cenotaph in London. He was 19 years old at the time. A judge gave him a suspended sentence.

 

Basically, the slap on the wrist. Told him he’d been a naughty boy, got a bit silly and off he goes home. Keep your head down. Don’t get into trouble again.

 

Young lad kicks a police van at an anti-migrant protest. 20 months in jail!

 

Now, I’m pretty sure that if you asked most people in this country what they think to an 18 year old lad kicking a police CCTV van, they would say, that’s unacceptable. If you ask them, should that young man go to jail, I think the answer would be unanimously, “no!” Sending somebody to jail for something like that is just overkill. It’s unfair. It goes against natural justice. Natural justice suggests that you should never be given a sentence that is disproportionate to the crime being committed.

 

[06:17]

 

So if you kicked a police van maybe you get a fine to pay for the dent, to be buffed out. Maybe you get community service to learn to be a good member of society. But jail for 20 months is ridiculous!

 

Now, equally, if you ask most normal people, what do you think to somebody who went to our cenotaph in London, a memorial to our war dead for multiple generations, and tried to set fire to the country’s flag? I think people would have a much harsher view of that kind of criminality than of somebody who kicked a police van. Yet this guy got let off!

 

Now, because of these injustices and because of the ridiculous sentences, and there has been some really terrible sentences. There’s been one where a mother of five has been jailed, so her kids are going to miss out on their mum for at least a year or more. Absolutely scandalous! I’ve seen cases where Muslim paedophile rapists have been spared jail because the Muslim’s wife didn’t speak English, so he had to be allowed out on the street. He had to be allowed out on the street because his wife couldn’t do the shopping. You know, she couldn’t get around. She needed him as an interpreter. She relied on him. But a mother, a White mother of five, she’s got to go to jail.

 

So you will see on our website, patrioticalternative.org dot UK, and you’ll see on our social media. We are the only group that has stepped up. We’re the only group that are doing something about this. We’re the only group that actually cares. And you can tell if somebody cares because they do something, they don’t just pay lip service to it.

 

We have started a fundraiser. We’ve already raised over 8,000 pounds for people who have been unfairly sentenced, and specifically for the families of those who have been separated from their mother, their father, their primary carer. So if people have children, if there’s an elderly man who’s cared for by his son, and his son is now in jail, we intend to discover who those people are and give them substantial donations.

 

So the more needy will get more, etcetera. That is something we’re doing. We’re also compiling a full list of people that we believe fall into one of three categories. The first, people who said things on social media, you shouldn’t be going to jail for things you said on social media. Simple as that.

 

Number two, people who have been unfairly sent to jail. So, you know, for basically non-crime. So people who kicked a police van. A guy got sentenced to jail for shouting at a police dog, another man for gesturing at the police, and one guy for simply being their world disorder take took place. People in that second category are people who were arrested and jailed for what were effectively non-crimes.

 

And thirdly, there is another category, people who were arrested for things that were undoubtedly crimes, like kicking a police van or throwing a rock. But these people have been jailed for a vastly disproportionate amount of time, that is years for something minor. We are compiling a list of people who fall into those three categories. People who said things on social media, people who committed non-crimes yet were jailed, and people who did commit minor crimes but were given harsh sentences. We’re compiling a list of those people were trying to get their prisoner numbers so that we can write to them, offer support to them, and give them any legal advice they may need.

 

This is a huge campaign. If you can help in any way, please, please check out what were doing both on social media and on our website, which is patrioticalternative.org dot UK.

 

The wandering Woodlander is finally here! How are you doing, my friend?

 

The Woodlander: I’m good. Hello, Mark. Sorry for my lateness. It couldn’t be helped. Traffic and whatnot. Should have left earlier.

 

Mark Collett: So it could have been helped? xx As always. zz As always. Yes, indeed.

 

So how have you been, my friend?

 

The Woodlander: Yeah, good. I’ve had a good day. It’s been a mad week, as I’m sure you’ve discussed. Interesting, though, Mark, really interesting. The things that have happened over this last week and the way that Starmer has introduced legislation and set precedents, which will be interesting to see going forward.

 

The one for me is that it looks like what he’s trying to do is to say that the government are the only people that give you the truth! And if you say anything other than what they’ve said, that is now misinformation or disinformation, and now they’ve criminalised publishing disinformation and misinformation!

 

So if you say anything that goes against what the government has put out, it looks as if that could be criminal. When you can get put in prison for misinformation, and they’re saying that only what they put out is the truth, then surely saying you don’t agree with the government would be misinformation. And that’s dangerous territory. But that does look like what he’s trying to do.

 

Mark Collett: Well, it actually goes further than that, if you don’t mind saying, and I’m getting a bit of feedback off your mic, Woodlander, every time I talk. Yeah, thank you.

 

So it goes further than that. I’ve actually read the documents that have passed this into law. And it actually doesn’t just criminalise misinformation and disinformation, it creates another one of these two tier systems.

 

[12:20]

 

So there are a number of exceptions that have been carved out in the legislation. So if you are sitting in Parliament, if you are working for an approved major broadcast, so that will be like ITV, Channel Four, Sky News, BBC. If you write for what they class as a major newspaper. So again, The Times, the Telegraph, the Mirror, the Sun, the Mail, the Express, or if you are somebody that they class, as you know, a leading member of the establishment, so you’re in the judiciary, you’re a leading police officer, you’re somebody who’s important to the establishment, you are exempt!

 

So this means if you’re a journalist and you say, like some of them have in the past. So I’ll give you an example. When there was the riots in Knowlesley, one journalist wrote this horrific newspaper report saying that it was all my fault, saying that I was the one who’d stirred it up. I had specifically sent people there, I was coordinating this, and they later had to retract that. It was later retracted because it was misinformation.

 

In fact, it was more than misinformation, it was a complete lie! Because there was nothing to base that on. I’d never said that. And on all the streams, you could go back. I’ll always say to people:

 

“Don’t attend protests after night, after dark. If you come to a PA protest, there’s no drinking. We’ve got to be as well behaved as possible. Don’t get involved in violence. If you think there’s going to be violence, probably best not to attend because you’re only going to get yourself arrested.”

 

This has been my mantra consistently since I started doing these shows in 2016.

 

Now, despite all that, this guy lied!

 

But if you were to then say, I’m ringing the police and I’m reporting you for spreading misinformation or disinformation about me, the police would immediately say:

 

“No case to answer. Because he is doing that through a major newspaper that there’s an exception for.”

 

So at this point, you’re not just creating a Ministry of Truth, you’re also creating some kind of level of hierarchy where if you are part of the establishment, you get a pass. And no matter what you do, you cannot be found guilty under these laws because they simply don’t apply to you.

 

The Woodlander: Yeah, I think we’ve all seen this coming for a long time. It seems that it’s happened really quickly since Starmer got in. But to be honest, I think he’s playing a playbook. I think this was already scripted out. All they were waiting for was the reaction that they got after those horrendous incidents. It could have been at any time, it just happened that it was a week, or a month into his premiership.

 

But I think this has been on the cards for a while. A huge legal crackdown on dissent and countering what’s put out by the government. And it’s really dangerous ground. We all know this historically, the communist playbook, where this leads to. And it’s getting to the point. I mean, we’re seeing it play out in real time at the moment, which is if you disagree, if you dissent, you’re off to the Gulag! Literally.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I completely agree. And these new laws, well, I’m actually doing a video on it on Friday on these laws, and not specifically these ones about misinformation and disinformation, but about these counter extremism laws, how they’re basically conflating extremism with terrorism and how they are dropping the threshold of what you need to do, which is the most worrying thing.

 

So the old threshold was if you were inciting racial hatred, you had to use language that was “abusive, insulting or threatening”.

 

Now, that’s quite a high barrier because if we’re sitting here tonight and we are saying:

 

“Well we don’t believe migrants should come here because they commit crime at statistically at a higher rate than the native population and they often target young girls. And this can be proven because X, Y and Z.”

 

That’s not threatening, it’s not abusive and it’s definitely not insulting. It’s just a calm statement in effect calling for policy change. But under new laws, they will say:

 

“Well, is that likely to incite hate?”

 

And it doesn’t have to be abusive, threatening or insulting. Somebody just has to say:

 

“Well, could that make people dislike migrants? Could that make people hate them?”

 

And all of a sudden, because you’re not on the BBC, the social media platform you’re on, because they’re talking about bringing back the Online Safety Bill again, but making it more robust.

 

So the platform you’re on is going to get a fine, you’re going to get a knock on the door, and it will make it very difficult for people to actually say really anything unless they’re part of the establishment. And if they’re part of the establishment, they’re going to say nothing anyway!

 

So that’s that!

 

The Woodlander: Yeah, it is, literally. Look, they’re criminalizing dissent, at the end of the day. And we saw this play out in the Covid pandemic, which is any dissent is instantly labelled “far-Right”.

 

And yet they will never, they will never define far-Right! I think that’s something we all need to push for, is a definition. This is a term they use all the time. What do they mean by that? Because if they can define it, you’ll find that most people will fall outside of it, or their definition is going to be so broad that it will encompass the whole of the British public. But it is something we need to hold them to account on, which is you keep using this term and yet you refuse to define it’s going to be a difficult one.

 

[19:09]

 

Mark Collett: Well, without tooting my own horn, I will say this. I predicted this years ago, but without using the term “far-Right”, I made a video years ago called What is a Nazi? And it had a provocative title because I wanted people to watch it. But at the time, the term “Nazi” was being, was the sort of go to term for anyone who said anything about immigration, said anything about multiculturalism, criticised the behaviour or criminal behaviour of migrant groups. You were called a Nazi. But Nazi was never defined.

 

However, it was made absolutely clear that it was okay to punch a Nazi. And you had Richard Spencer punched. And all these Lefties were putting the footage of Richard Spencer being punched in the face into their YouTube videos thinking it was hilarious! Punch a Nazi was trending on Twitter. And I was saying:

 

“Well, what is a Nazi?”

 

This is the problem when you get to call anyone you want a “Nazi”, but equally, you get to punch anyone who’s a “Nazi”, it gives you pretty much carte blanche to punch anyone you want because you’ve branded them this sort of cover-all word for somebody that you don’t like. Because that’s all it is. You know, no one’s properly going to define what I am.

 

And I’ve always been quite, … If I’m in public, I’m talking to normal people, I’m a nationalist. If I’m talking to people like yourself, my audience, people who are more initiated, I will differentiate and say I’m an ethno-nationalist because I believe there is more to nationalism than just waving a flag and living on a patch of land. I believe it’s blood and soil.

 

Now, that’s very important definition. But at that point, if you were to sell that to normal people and say to normal people:

 

“Look, I believe that to be an indigenous Brit, which is who I represent, you have to be of European stock and you have to have British ancestry that goes back a number of generations.”

 

And it is more likely that Europeans who have come here will integrate. And because of that, we want to restrict mass immigration from the developing and third world into Britain and put strict quotas, for that matter, on people coming from Europe because we don’t want to be chopping up our countryside, destroying our last bits of ancient forest and living like basically, like I said, sardines in a can. We don’t want to live that.

 

Now, if you say that to normal people, most normal people would say:

 

“This guy’s not a Nazi, he’s talking common sense!”

 

But according to the Left, you could just walk up to me and punch me in the side of the head for saying that. And you get polite applause from people in power.

 

And remember, at the time, all of this was sort of bubbling away, people like Theresa May were quite happy for people to be punched. People in the Conservative Party were quite happy for these terms to be thrown around and people to be victimized.

 

But now “far-Right” is a much wider reaching slogan. And that’s where I was wrong. I thought they were going to leave it at Nazi. So Nazis, the ultimate bad guy, you call some a Nazi, it gives them the right to hit them.

 

But now it’s far-Right. But what does far-Right apply to? Because the Guardian and certain certain large sections of the broadcast media, they would say anyone in Reform and Nigel Farage are far-Right.

 

So at that point I think they’d have a problem defining it. So they won’t it’ll be a law that’s purposely fuzzy around the edges, an umbrella law that can be applied, as and when they see fit.

 

The Woodlander: Yeah, exactly that. A lot of this legislation that’s coming through now is so vague. The Online Harm’s Bill, again, everything in there is vague. And we know why they do it. They do it so that they can use it against anyone they wish to, any time they wish to. And they don’t have to apply it when they don’t want to.

 

I know you’ve been talking about it and I’ve also, I mean I was on a stream last week and I was saying:

 

“Look, the thing we need to be pushing for now is a White British advocacy group.”

 

That was picked up by Academic Agent and re-shared the video that I did saying we need a White British advocacy group, that can liaise between the public and the authorities, that can liaise between the public and the press. And it’s going to have to be a group that isn’t political.

 

A lot of people said:

 

“Well what about Nigel Farage? You know, he’d be great as a, as an advocacy for the White British working class.”

 

The problem is he’s part of a political party and it would then look like actually what he’s doing is campaigning for votes.

 

What we need is someone that isn’t a political party that is set up to advocate for the rights of the White British! And I say White British because that’s the government’s own terminology so it can’t be used against us. It’s what’s on the census forms. But that organisation needs to look at all criminal cases, but not just criminal, social injustice. And it needs to contact local MP’s where this is happening and demand a response:

 

“This is happening in your area. Are you aware of it? If you are, what are you doing about it? If you’re not aware of it now, you are. What is your response? And we require a response from you!”

 

And then we can contact the press and then we can contact the police.

 

If there’s a riot, or a protest with any other group the police will go and speak to “community leaders”. Now these community leaders aren’t voted in by the Asian community or by the Somalian community or by the Afghanistani community. These are self appointed community leaders. We need someone, some advocacy group that is going to be the community leader for the White British, so that if there’s a protest going on, they go and speak to them and maybe we can get to the term where we can tell them how to police it, which is what happens in all other cases. It’s a hard ask! And I’ve said this on the stream, it’s going to take money to build an organisation like that. And it’s going to take ongoing commitment. But this doesn’t need a billionaire backer. It doesn’t need a millionaire. I’ll tell you what it needs. It needs the people! It needs the people listening to this to go, do you know what? We do need one. And if every single person gives a little bit, all of those little bits add up to, enough!

 

You’ve just raised 8,000 pounds for the families. We need to be doing this on a regular basis. We need legal representation. We need to be able to hire top class legal representation. We need to fight these cases! We need to fight these cases, as many as we can, and tie up the legal system, right? And it’s going to take time, it’s going to take money, but this is something that we have to do and is possible to do! So we need to do it.

 

[27:04]

 

Mark Collett: Well, I agree, and I don’t know if you heard all the intro that I gave while you were sort of coming into the house, but I was talking about the outreach campaign that PA are doing at the moment. We’ve raised over 8,000 pounds for families have been affected by these harsh sentences and this two tier justice system.

 

We’re already creating an outreach for prisoners and we’ve split because, look, I know that some of the people who have been jailed probably did pretty stupid things. So, like if somebody tried to set fire to a building or torched a car or was out looting, we’re not going to be raising money for them. But we are raising money for people who said things on social media who have been jailed for non-crimes or arrested for non-crimes or jailed harshly for minor crimes. So there’s been a major abuse of sentencing. And we’re doing that.

 

And also what you said about liaising with the police, we do that regularly. So we had a demonstration in Hull recently. I’m proud to say we’re the only nationalist group in the whole of the UK that during those anti-migrant protests, we didn’t turtle, we didn’t disappear, we went out, we were on the streets, we did a protest, we liaised with the police and we had about 60, 70 people at the protest. It was really, really good!

 

But it wasn’t just good, if you watched it, where was the police presence? Well, we had two police liaison officers, because we sorted it out with them beforehand. I speak to them in advance, I run through the things we want to do, I come up with a plan, I decide with them, where we’re going to meet up, how long it’s going to last, how we’re going to arrive, how we’re going to leave, know, assurances are given.

 

So, for example, if it’s a PA protest, I always say to the police:

 

“Look, when we’re done, everybody who is with us will immediately depart the area of the protest and we will drive, you know, 10, 15 minutes away to go for a drink and have something to eat. No one is sent onto a city centre, no one’s sent down the road to the pub around the corner.”

 

And we reassure the police that we are going to do that peacefully. So when you see a PA protest, there isn’t lines of riot police in the shot because they’re simply not there. You saw that in Leeds when we did the protest and demonstration in Leeds when Sam was jailed. And you can do these things if you’re willing to actually engage. And we have engaged at every level.

 

So when they were thinking of bringing in the new extremism laws under the Conservatives, we wrote a robust letter to both Mark Rowley and to Sarah Khan laying out our points and basically voicing our disgust that we were mentioned that way. The same when Michael Gove mentioned us in Parliament.

 

And I think one of the big problems we’ve got as nationalists, and this does need discussing, and I’ve said this to people privately. So many nationalists have been so used to taking a beating and I mean that metaphorically and sometimes literally, that every time some injustice occurs, they just take it! They’re completely stoic and they take it.

 

However, we found that if you start issuing legal letters, if you start writing to the prisons, if you start protesting, if you work within a reasonable framework and adopt some of the tactics that the Left used in the 1960s during the Civil Rights Movement that can be directly applied to our movement.

 

And you and I have had long chats offline, I made no bones about this. I am not a huge fan of the electoral system. I’ve got an article actually, that’s being published in Heritage and Destiny laying out what I believe is that it’s a 3, 500 word article. It comes out in this month’s Heritage and Destiny, laying out what I believe is the future for the movement. I think ethno-nationalists need to get serious. Adopt a White civil rights approach. Stop messing about with these Parliamentary elections. If we do fight elections, they have to be on the basis of nationalist independence in localised areas where we can win.

 

But we have to focus on the things that we can do where we not just pouring tens of thousands of pounds into an electoral system that’s stacked against us, where we’re going to get 0.7% of the vote and be a footnote at the end of the election.

 

So when you look down that table and you see the top three, the only votes that count are the votes for the winning candidate. That’s the first thing.

 

But when you look down that table and you see others down below, outside of the top three, we’re just that little footnote in that election. But it might have cost us two and a half, 5,000, 10,000 pounds to fight just one Parliamentary by-election. And for what? For nothing!

 

But as you will be able to tell us, 10,000 pounds could go a long way for other things.

 

[32:21]

 

The Woodlander: Look, you’re talking my language! I was involved with the BNP, I think, before, I left when you joined, probably. I did a lot of looking. I spent a decade working within those organisations, those small political parties and activist groups. And it’s just apparent. It was apparent that the system was never going to allow those people near the levers of power. It might allow them to climb up slightly so that they were viewed by the public, and then they were squashed! And that was visibly seen by the public.

 

I watched UKIP rise from the back pages of This is England magazine, as this tiny little group under Goldsmith, be co-opted and turned into a pressure valve for the British people to allow their frustrations to come out. But it was never going anywhere as a political organisation! The political route has been blocked for quite a while.

 

And if you look back through nationalist history, the BNP was the most successful in a hundred years! A hundred years! Thousands of people, millions of man hours, millions upon millions of pounds spent to get us to the position we are now! Which is still exactly where we were 100 years ago, out there in the Wilderness.

 

If in just the last 30 years, we put those man hours and that money into buying property, into buying land, into investing in our people’s businesses, right, we would be the wealthiest organisation in this country. We would then be able to, … It’s not political people that hold the power. The Conservative Party might have been a very powerful political party, but I can promise you they were beholden to the people that fund them! They’re beholden to people like the building industry. They’re beholden to the man that gives him half a million quid. They have to do what they want. And this has been going on for years now.

 

People need to understand the real power comes through being powerful! Businesses, landowners, corporations. And this is something, this is an Avenue we haven’t explored. I think I heard you say the other day:

 

“This is fertile ground!”

 

Mark Collett: What I actually said was basically Morgoth. Morgoth said:

 

“Nature hates open soil! And it immediately tries to claim open soil and something will grow there.”

 

And that was an interesting point. But what isn’t open soil, what’s already a tangled mass, an overgrown mess, is the political space. And at the moment, the biggest and most fertile growth in that open space, from our perspective, is Reform.

 

And no one’s going past that. They’re going to live underneath it. It’ll block out the sunlight. And there isn’t going to be any nationalist tree under that because there’s not space.

 

However, there is fertile open ground adjacent to where Reform is. And that’s what I’m talking about going into. I’m talking about White civil rights, I’m talking about land acquisition, I’m talking about advocacy, I’m talking about what the Left did in the 1960s.

 

Now, the British people, I talked about this last week, so we’re not going to go back over this, but I said basically last week on PWR that the British people have been conditioned that the civil rights approach is the right approach. You can’t undo that conditioning. So all we have to do is apply that approach to our cause and they will naturally see our cause in a different light, which is important.

 

But something else is important. Now, I’ve been mischaracterized on this, and I think I’d like you to sort of speak about a little bit about this as well, because you and I have talked about it offline. You don’t have to unmute your mic, but did you see the debate I did with the “little man”? Yes. Well, the little man tried to mischaracterize me and say that I wanted to sort of go and live in tiny enclaves where there was like six or seven of us, and I just die there peacefully. That’s not true.

 

I’m saying go to somewhere like Savile town in Dewsbury and what do you see? An entire functioning Muslim community with its own schools, its own shops, its own community centres, its own religious buildings, its own medical care. They have their own food, their own clothes, the signs are in their own language.

 

The whole thing is its not three houses on an estate next door to each other. They just barbecue together on every other Sunday. It’s an entire community!

 

And if the rest of Britain said:

 

“Right, we’re never coming to Savile town again.”

 

They would completely, as long as they could get their food and their amenities in there, they would still function completely as they were. They don’t need outside people. They even have their own supermarkets.

 

And I’m not talking about three or four houses. I’m saying that if we want power, power comes from a heartland like that. And once you own the institutions within that heartland, it bonds the people in the heartland together so they are more likely to act as a group. We have nothing like that. And people can laugh at me and say:

 

“Oh, what are you going to do? Run away to a tiny Hamlet and have eight little houses together?”

 

Well if it starts with eight little houses, it starts with eight little houses. But what I’m saying is there are parts of the country that are still 90% White. British little towns, villages that could become White heartlands where nationalists move to and capture the local amenities, take over the local community centre, run the scouts. You know, if there’s a local they don’t call them schools anymore, but there’s academies where parents essentially run them as a cooperative. Why home-school? Who wants to home-school when you’ve got your own school that the parents run! And that’s what the Muslims do.

 

[39:32]

 

The Woodlander: This all comes down to one thing, which, and I think this is happening, which is we have to collectivise, we have to understand we are a group. For far too long we’ve all thought of ourselves as individuals, but we’re the only group that thinks of ourselves as individuals, and that’s always going to leave us at a disadvantage.

 

But you’re dead right about. I mean I’ve also had a back and forth with young Alec and I give him his due, I respect his enthusiasm. He’s kind of where I was 30 years ago and I’ve tried to explain some things to him and I think he doesn’t quite understand what I’m saying, which is, that’s fine. It’s not about cutting yourself off. I mean it did get to the point where he said:

 

“You know, anybody who leaves a big city to try and improve their life is a coward!”

 

And I don’t really know how to answer that.

 

Mark Collett: I do! I can answer it for you. I can answer it if somebody says that to me, I say:

 

“Well, then you’re a dickhead!”

 

Because fundamentally, if you’ve got a daughter or young children and they’re going to be a hated minority and their life is going to be a living nightmare, because you’re in a city centre and you can take them to an area where they can flourish and you can help them. If you don’t do that, you’re not [word unclear], everyone wants the best start.

 

The Woodlander: I mean, I know that that. I think he’s a bit confused. But what you’re saying is dead right. The argument against it is not everyone can afford to do that. Well, actually, you might be right in the beginning, but here’s what happens when you start to take control of an area is, you do buy property, and then you can say to those people still stuck in cities:

 

“Listen, do you want somewhere to live? Because we’ve got some properties and we can help you out here.”

 

So you can actually start to help your people, really help them! Not by saying:

 

“In 15 years time we might be able to halfway get into a council.”

 

No, that’s not really helping your people. If I say to a young man in Manchester who desperately wants to get out because he’s got a wife and a young daughter:

 

“Well, I’ll tell you what, I’ve got a two bedroom house here, right? It’s usually going for 300,000. We’ll arrange the mortgage for you because we’ve got a special deal and it will cost you no more than the house you’re renting at the moment!”

 

Now I’m helping someone. Now I’m able to help our people.

 

People know what I’m doing, buying land. And there’s two parts to that. There’s the initiative, which is open to everyone in our group, so members can use that land.

 

But there’s also members that want their own part. They want to buy their own bit of land, and that’s cool! By grouping these people together, we’ve now actually managed to buy two, three plots of land where people own their own individual plot. What they do with that and how we work that, right, is interesting because I spent hours upon hours talking to a solicitor the other day who actually said:

 

“I think we’ve got it nailed down. I should be able to get something through so you can put buildings on that land for people to live, legally.”

 

Now, if it comes off, I could be saying to people:

 

“Listen, I’ve got a two bedroom house. It’s ten grand. Ten grand! Are you interested?”

 

Now, this is real positive steps forward, right? I mean, I’ve got young children. I say young. My boys are in their thirties. And one of them is in a rented accommodation, the same as many 30 year olds. He’s got a wife, he’s got a baby and it’s a tiny little place and he can’t afford anything else. They’re working people, they can’t afford to move, they can’t even afford a place with a garden! And that’s horrendous! So imagine how good I feel when I say:

 

“Well, here is a two bedroom house. Have it!”

 

Why? Because I can build that. And with the people I’ve got involved with me, we could probably knock it up in a weekend. I’ve got builders in there, carpenters in there, I’ve got wood merchants in that group. We’ve got every skill you could possibly think of, right? We’re going down to some land that we own at the end of this month to build toilet facilities, shower facilities, so that people who do go there camping, especially the young ladies, have got somewhere they can clean up and go to the lavatory. Not like the gentlemen who just go beyond the oak tree. But that will be built over two days!

 

We can do that because we’re collectivising! We’re coming together to do something in a positive way that will help people. So much better than saying:

 

“Do, you know what? Join the group, give us ten pounds and hopefully in 20 years we’ll sweep to power.”

 

Which is a fantasy! I don’t know what to say, really.

 

[45:05]

 

Mark Collett: Look, I fundamentally agree with you. And this idea that we’re going to get success in the places where we are the smallest minority and have the most pushing against us is just idiotic! I mean, it’s like me saying to somebody, look:

 

“Your military is most likely to break through in the area where the enemy is strongest.”

 

People would laugh at you. That’s the analogy. To create a situation where we can break through, we need tactical withdrawal from the cities and towns that we’ve lost.

 

So, it’s like saying to somebody, I think Newham in London. So if you look at all 331 council boroughs in England, so you’ve got, like, bigger ones like Leeds, Birmingham, Manchester, then you’ve got smaller ones. And London’s made up of multiple council areas, but the worst council area out of them all in the whole of the UK is Newham, which is only 14% White British.

 

Now, anyone that would suggest that would be a fertile ground for us would be insane! You would actually be looking for the ones where we were in abundance.

 

For example, you know, no one would say to a Muslim cleric:

 

“The place you’re going to do the best is in a place that’s 90% White British and there’s only three Muslims.”

 

That’s why they cluster together. But I want to say this as well. Woodlander Initiative is not PA. I don’t own this. Many of people who are members of PA are part of Woodlander Initiative, but I absolutely endorse this. I absolutely endorse this! And what this man’s doing is amazing!

 

And everyone should endorse this, because it’s a genuine solution. It’s something that works hand in hand with other solutions as well. So PA aren’t buying land and putting up toilet blocks. We’re not doing that. This guy is. This guy is Pooling money to purchase land. But Woodland isn’t doing the White civil rights stuff, that’s us. We can work together, the two groups can work together and we can help each other. And we’re already working with groups like Workers of England, Union. We’re already doing legal advocacy in that way and we intend to continue. It’s a good idea.

 

But let’s just segue away because we talked today, I have three things that I wanted to talk to you about. One was your solutions. The other was two tier justice.

 

But there is an increasing number of White British ethno-nationalists that are now leaving the UK to live abroad and some of them are forced to do that. Obviously, everyone knows Tommy Robinson’s left.

 

There’s been a lot of talk about David Clews because he has been wrongly named by papers, he’s been singled out by the government. They seem intent on destroying that man’s life and his wife’s life. And he has now left the UK.

 

And interestingly, as these people were leaving the UK, Russia have now made overtures to people in the West who are victims of what they have called “Western neo-liberal policy”.

 

And I’m not going to just talk about Russia because if I do, there’ll be a load of people going:

 

“Ahh! But this and that and the other!”

 

I’m going to talk in a broader sense. Russia aren’t the only country doing this. There are other Eastern European countries that have welcomed White dissident political figures and their supporters on the basis that:

 

“If you come here, you stick by the laws, you don’t do any harm to our government and you just basically want to criticise British government from our soil. You can live here in peace and we’ve got no problem with it.”

 

What do you think about that for a solution? Because it’s one of those interesting points where I don’t want to sound like I want to run away, but a lot of people are looking at this seriously.

 

The Woodlander: I’ve had the “running away” finger pointed at me so many times, I’ve lost interest with it. I’ve had the opportunity to move out of the country quite a few times. My parents moved out of the country, moved to Spain for many reasons. They just saw the country they once loved slowly becoming worse. So they moved to Spain. I could have moved out there. It was a much better standard of living, a better healthcare system, but I didn’t. I stayed.

 

I stayed and built a business, and I’ve got grandkids here now. I completely understand why someone would. If someone’s single, or a young couple, there are better countries. And that’s a horrible thing to say! And it leaves a sour taste in my mouth to say it. But sadly, Britain is becoming so restrictive, I mean, massively restrictive! And I don’t see that getting any better. We will have to wait and see.

 

But I think next year is going to be a turning point. They’ve been very open with that date of 2025 and again, 2030 on loads of different documents, they seem to be specific dates. That could be why he’s going in so hard and fast now. The Online Harms Bill, the new legislation, it just doesn’t look good.

 

There is another group in America as well, I mean, you’ve talked about Eastern Europe and Russia, the Return to the Land organisation, who’s run by one of our guys in the Ozarks area in the States. They purchased 158 acres. That was their first purchase. Broken up into roughly three acre plots. They’re building hash homes. They’ve built a school, they’ve got an academy. They’ve got businesses set up on the land. They reckon they will be able to take over their local government, the sheriff and the local government within two years, because there’ll be more of them than there are people in the village. It’s quite interesting. So there are opportunities outside of this country.

 

What I would like to see is groups like PA, groups like the Woodlander Initiative, groups like the British Democrats that are running the political site, coming together, sitting around a table, and working out a way forward where we can all work together. Right? This has needed to be done for a long time, and I’m up for that. I think we can do something here, I really do. But it would be handy to have people in other countries, just in case it all goes pear shaped.

 

[52:34]

 

Mark Collett: Well, I agree, and I’ve been to one of these unity meetings, and other than two people who stormed out like children, everyone else got on and agreed to a plan of action.

 

And one of those plans of action was not to stand against each other. If there was going to be a demonstration, the idea was that groups would ask each other first. We would try not to hold demonstrations more than sort of once every four to six weeks, because it was destroying the demonstration scene. Good ground was made and lots of people who saw that were interested in attending future unity meeting. So maybe you and I should have a talk about that and arrange that.

 

But one thing I’ve got to say is I’ve never been drawn to going to Spain, but I do have a particular fantasy. And before anyone says anything funny in the chat, not that type of fantasy. I love these places where you can buy sort of 8 square kilometres woodland, and then there’s a house made of glass, wood and steel in the middle of it.

 

And it’s like one of these super technical, modern like, but retro buildings at the same time. So it’s all modern and beautiful and spacious, but it’s made of wood and glass. And when you wake up in the morning, you see the forest and you’re surrounded by the trees.

 

And that would be more my style than running away to the south of Spain for what they get in Spain. I’m not really up for that. But if I was going to go, which I have no plans to, that would be my, … You know, the sort of thing. I mean, where if you bought it in this country, it would set you back like one and a half million, but if you bought it in some Eastern European country, it would be like 150 grand!

 

The Woodlander: Well, again, I’ve been speaking to the lads on the Return to the Land Organisation in the States. Their land has increased in value massively just by doing the work they’ve done on it together.

 

And I can give you some sort of example just on the plot I bought. I bought two acres of woodland, I built a cabin. I didn’t break any laws to do it. And it’s here and it’s fine. I built this. It’s increased in value now about 500%, which isn’t a bad markup. So there’s things you can do and there’s things you can do as an organisation and as a company, where you can generate income and then you can plough that back into helping our people, which is all I’m actually doing.

 

There’s so many more avenues where we can help the people and that includes political parties that we want to back as well. For too many years I’ve listened to people say things like:

 

“Oh yeah, but we’ve got no financial backers.”

 

Okay, that’s fine. Let’s grow our own then! Let’s build some businesses where people do become wealthy and they can put money into it. Laura knows this all too well. You know, she started the tea company and that’s a fantastic thing! But we should be looking at all of our people that want to start businesses, help them out, build them up, have somewhere that they can advertise their goods, all of this sort of thing. Grow the businesses and that money will come back into our group. It’s obvious, really.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I fundamentally agree, and that is what other groups do.

 

And I’ve said this on streams before. You know, when Mr Akhtar wants to buy two new tyres for his car to get it MOT’d, he goes down to Mr Javid’s tyre yard. And when they take it to get the car MOT’d because he’s got his new tyres on they go to Mohammed’s MOT centre. They don’t go to the big chain organisation like Quick Fit. They don’t go to the little White guy on the other side of town and give him their business. They keep their money in their own communities. And that’s something you can’t do if you live in an area where you’re a tiny minority.

 

And to me, what you’re saying with what they’re doing in America, it’s funny because all these people who talk about the need to fight elections, they don’t understand how you win elections. You win elections from having a community group. Let’s say, because Australia and America are great examples of this. I’m a huge fan of watching real crime documentaries. And when you’re watching these, you often find out about almost abandoned towns in places like America and Australia because sometimes horrible things happen there and you’re watching it and they say this almost abandoned town in Australia was a place where the criminals took their, … You’re thinking:

 

“How can there be an entire town that’s abandoned?”

 

But if a hundred nationalists move to that almost abandoned town where there’s only 100 people there currently, well, straight away they’ve got 50% of the vote and the electoral side of it comes naturally, off the back of just being a natural majority.

 

And like you said, with these guys in the States, by the time they rejuvenated one of these small towns that they bought land up around and they’ve got 100 families living there, it won’t matter whether people hate them. It won’t matter whether there’s an anti-fascist candidate. It won’t matter if a group like an American version of Hope Not Hate comes and leaflets every house, they’re automatically winning every single election! Just as Muslim groups have done here. And these things, ironically, the things that we’re talking about, despite us saying the electoral route is off limits to us at the moment, the things we’re talking about would actually allow for total electoral victory on a local level!

 

[58:52]

 

The Woodlander: Exactly that! If you have enough people an area, you win the council seat and you run the council. And the money comes down from government and you spend it in your community, you hand it out to the projects that you want to. And we understand this because when it was called the “Loony Left” in the eighties and they were getting the money from government and they were spending all these stupid Left-wing projects, we could do exactly the same. But for our people! It’s not rocket science, right?

 

But in order to do that, you need to take control of the area with the people first. So either buy the land and build the homes, or buy the homes and move in the people, grow businesses, buy property, all of these different Avenues, which we haven’t done before. And within two to three years, you are a very powerful groups, and able to help!

 

Mark Collett: Also, I do think at the moment, and this goes in the face of what we just said, there is a viable route for ethno-nationalists who are not face out and have not shown their hand publicly to get elected. And that is actually through the Reform Party. For the first time in the history of electoral politics in the UK, a political party standing on an anti-immigration platform has returned candidates to Parliament.

 

Now, this presents opportunities, but it also presents pitfalls. No one is going up against them and beating them. In fact, they will destroy anyone who goes up against them.

 

Secondly, going up against them would actually be a really stupid thing. And I said this to someone the other day, I said:

 

“What’s going to happen if people keep thinking along the lines of the electoral route is there’s going to be five tiny nationalist parties, the Heritage party, British Democrats, you know, Reclaim, several of them will all stand in a Parliamentary by-election. Reform will also stand. Reform will take about 12,000 votes. These parties will all take 200 each, totalling 1,000 votes and Labour will get 12, 100 votes.”

 

And you’re actually going to get a situation where squabbling tiny nationalist parties that didn’t get a significant portion of the vote actually ensured that Labour took a seat and that would be a disaster?

 

Now, if you are a young, bright male or female, you’re looking at the ethno-nationalist movement and you’re thinking:

 

“Look, Mark, look, Woodlander, I really like what you’re saying, but I am really passionate about elections. I want to be out canvassing, I want to be out leafleting, I want to be out knocking on doors and asking for people’s votes. I want to do that. And Mark, you did that when you were younger.”

 

My advice is go and do it! But basically cut ties or cut public ties with any ethno-nationalist group. Don’t go face out for ethno-nationalism. Enter Reform. Keep your views intact, keep watching these shows, keep your close friends. You aren’t going to tell people what you’re up to. Move through the ranks of Reform, get yourself on that Parliamentary ticket and maybe in five years you’ll be an MP! At which point you can use your Parliamentary privilege to say what you want about mass immigration and Keir Starmer and two tier policing!

 

The Woodlander: It’s far easier to do, than you would realise. When I left the BNP, in 1997 when Blair was elected and I’ve been following his trajectory. I joined the Conservative Party and everyone was like:

 

“What are you doing?”

 

But I joined it at a time when they were at the time at their lowest point. And I wanted to see would it be possible to move nationalists into the Conservative Party and move it to the Right. Within three months of joining the Conservative Party, I sat on the European committee. I was shadowing an MP at the House of Commons. They were already talking about putting me into a safe seat as an MP in two years time. They put me down to run as a councillor, even though I said even if I won, I wasn’t going to run as a councillor. They were saying:

 

“No, but what we want to do is get your name on the ticket so that you’re a known brand. We will then take you out of the council thing and put you into the MP bracket.”

 

All of these different things. And yes, I met Thatcher, had dinner with Portillo, and all of this stuff. All my opinions never changed. I didn’t change my opinions! But I’m able to talk to Lord Stockton 1 minute and my mate works at the rubbish tip the next without annoying either of them. So it’s just common sense really, how you move through those ranks.

 

You would find if you joined Reform that you wouldn’t need to keep your views to yourself. I bet 90% of the people, the grassroots membership, which is what I found in the Conservative Party, that the grassroots membership of that party were just as Right-wing as I was, really! It’s just when you get to that very top level, when you get to the Tices, when you get to the Farages, they are corrupt at that top level!

 

And that’s what I found with all of the MP’s that I was mixing with and talking to and watching the dealings that was going on. It was corrupt as hell! But below them there is an opportunity to speak to people, to explain things to people, to move the whole thing further to our point of view. Without a shadow of a doubt!

 

[1:05:26]

 

Mark Collett: I completely agree. And I think it’s sort of we could do this Superchat out of order because ThinRedLine gave $5. Thank you so much! He said:

 

“In my opinion, one does not expect exclude the other. Why not do both build communities and seek political power at the same time?”

 

I think we’re kind of answering this now. There’s two ways that we can gain political power.

 

The first is build the communities and then local power would naturally come from that.

 

And secondly, using what is now an established and very electable brand, to parachute our people into winnable seats.

 

And I think in five years, time. Look, Stamar’s already crashed the plane, you know, he has already taken it into a nosedive. Look at what he’s managed to screw up in a month and a half. You’ve had multiple stabbings of people, all by migrants. You’ve got him going mental and calling for two tier policing and restrictive new laws. You’ve got them cutting winter fuel allowance for 10 million British pensioners. When we say British pensioners, look at the population pyramid. Pensioners in this country are the Whitest segment of the population pyramid.

 

So you’re going to be talking 90% of people affect the by that, if not more, will be White. He’s cutting their winter fuel allowance. He’s also talking about upping inheritance tax and screwing families out of their family homes.

 

They’re talking about pay per mile taxation for your car. So you’re not just going to go and get your car tax, you know. So I know people who’ve got very small and efficient petrol cars where you don’t pay any tax on them, because they fall under the threshold because they don’t present any form of pollutant.

 

And also I do know people with electric cars, not that I’d want an electric car myself. And they don’t pay any tax because they don’t use fossil fuels.

 

Now, these people are soon going to be told that you are going to be taxed and you’re going to have to fit a little black box to your car and every mile you go, you’re going to have to pay so many Pence to the government. And also that little black box will track you wherever you go and let the government know where you are at any given time. Labour are going full in on this! And they’re also going full in on allowing migrants to come here!

 

And I think it’s only a matter of time, and this is a pretty safe bet. It’s only a matter of time before eventually they have some kind of amnesty and they say:

 

“Look, all these illegal immigrants, they’re now British, so they’re staying here.”

 

Now, all of this is going to build Reform into, especially in Red Wall areas, the official opposition. You’ve already got 34 seats where Reform are in second place. And that second place when the Tories are in government. Imagine what it’s going to be after five years of Labour, after five years of Labour. People are going to be seething!

 

And what’s more, many of the people who have been unfairly arrested being victims of this two tier policing, live in Red Wall areas. I think embedding yourself in the Reform Party now and looking to four or five years down the line, that could be an electoral solution. Look, I’ve been in political parties before. There are very few activists. So the BNP, even at its height, with 14 and a half thousand members at its annual conference, just under 200 people, that was its key activist base.

 

Now, I should imagine Reforms will be probably about the same, because it’s a very elderly party. There’s a lot of older people in it. A young, active, fiery person willing to go leafleting once or twice a week is immediately going to be the go to person in that branch or in that region to take the best seat, because most of the people they have just won’t be active.

 

The Woodlander: No. And that’s the point. If you’re actually willing to do things within a political party, because most people are, most people are members, but never do anything.

 

If you want to get involved and you volunteer for things, you’ll be the guy running the Reform business club, which is what I did at the Conservatives. So I ran the Conservative business club. I was instrumental when rebuilding the Young Conservatives in the southwest. I started a new group called the Thirties to Forties Club, which was after young Conservatives of the 30 to 40s.

 

Now, all of these things were things that I said:

 

“Well you know why don’t we do this?”

 

When you’re talking to a bunch of people, … When I joined, the average age was 75, maybe 76. That was the average age of the people in the Conservative Association in the southwest. And it was like they didn’t do anything! Apart from their luncheons or their suppers once a month. And they’d have a speaker and they put some money in a kitty. They didn’t do anything.

 

So if you get someone who’s in there who’s active, who says:

 

“Look, we should be doing this, we want to get active on social media. We could do this. Let’s start a new group to get involved with education.”

 

You’ll be the guy they’ll be looking to get it done. It may as well be our guys in there doing this. That’s better for us. And in the long run it’s better for Reform as well. You will find Reform slowly moving to our way of thinking.

 

[1:11:32]

 

Mark Collett: I completely agree. Well, we’ve got another chat on this issue, which we’ll do out of sync. Jez 9999 said:

 

“If what the majority of the membership thought mattered, the Conservatives would have massively cut immigration. Joining Reform and trying to say anything Farage considers unacceptable is a complete waste of time. You’ll be kicked out immediately!”

 

We’re not saying join Reform. And then whip out your copy of your favourite nationalist book and say to Farage:

 

“Right, read this. This is what we need to do.”

 

What we’re saying is go into that party. They are understaffed and undermanned at local level. Go into the party, show enthusiasm, talk enthusiastically about things you can talk about in the party, such as migration control, deporting illegals, etcetera. You will soon be very well liked and you will soon be the branch organiser for somewhere like Sunderland.

 

You know, once you’re the branch organiser for Sunderland and you’re out leafleting every week, you’re going to be the guy that they ask to be the local Parliamentary candidate. And in places like Sunderland, I believe Reform are already on 34% of the vote. Well, that 34% is only going to rise dramatically when many pensions in Sunderland this winter and subsequent winters leading up to the next general election can’t heat their homes because Rachel Reeves cut their fuel allowance so she could divert more money to the huge and growing number of illegal immigrants still living in hotels all around the country!

 

These are things that people can do. No one is saying:

 

“Join Reform. Go in there and try to red pill everybody in there and show them all Europa: The Last Battle, or The Greatest Story Never Told!”

 

Don’t go up to Farage and say:

 

“Look, you need to watch The Greatest Story Never Told, mate. There was this guy in Germany and he had some good ideas.”

 

Don’t do that. That’d be idiotic! It’s about people who want to fight electorally should basically go into Reform, keep their heads down, play the game, get elected to Parliament, then use their Parliamentary privilege to go full mask off. It’s simple! Do you have anything to add to that, mate?

 

The Woodlander: No, I’ve got to be honest. I think Reforms there because they’re allowed to be there is, but whilst they are there, they’ve done something that no nationalist group has ever managed to do, and get into Parliament. To not take advantage of that, if it’s possible, would be a ludicrous situation. It really would. That’s a much easier route to Parliamentary power than starting a new political party and building up over 20 years, only to find at the end of it that they won’t allow you anywhere near power. That’s a wasted two decades!

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, to be frank, anyone who has started one of these micro parties over the last few years, they are going to face three huge problems.

 

One, they are never going to have the membership, activist or support base.

 

Number two, they are never going to have the money, the funding, the wealth.

 

And number three, they are never going to have a celebrity candidate who is a household name and who has a proven track record of breaking political barriers that nobody else has ever broken before.

 

Farage has achieved three things that no one else in the history of British politics has achieved! He won two national elections for two separate political parties. He took total victory in 2014 for UKIP. He took total victory in 2019 for the Brexit Party. He then went on to make the most significant policy change against the flow of policy that anyone’s ever made, which was the bringing about of Brexit.

 

And finally, he’s the only anti-immigration candidate who runs an anti-immigration party that has broken that Parliamentary barrier.

 

Nobody in the next four or five years before the next general election could build anything like that. It would take decades to achieve that.

 

And what’s more, decades is a period of time that we do not have. If somebody tells me that they’ve got a long game that can get us Parliamentary seats in, … Because Farage has been doing this since about 1999, I believe. So it’s taken him sort of two and a half decades to break that barrier. Two and a half decades. If somebody said to me today:

 

“We have a plan and it’s going to be two and a half decades and it’s going to get us five or six MP’s.”

 

I would actually look at them and say:

 

“Even if you could guarantee that, would that give us the time span to actually get a workable majority and reverse anything?”

 

The Woodlander: We haven’t got 20 years. I think we both know that. I think things are going to get harder and harder and harder for smaller groups. They’re going to get harder and harder and harder for individuals to actually say anything! The whole system is geared against us! The government have come out and said:

 

“Here’s the enemy! Guess what? It’s you! You are the enemy! The chances of you sweeping to power are zero. It’s not going to happen!”

 

It hasn’t happened in a hundred years. And I hear people saying:

 

“Yeah, but times are different now.”

 

Yes, they are. It’s harder now! It’s harder now than it was in the thirties, the forties, sixties, seventies, eighties or nineties k, it is harder now. It’s not going to happen! They’re going to make it harder.

 

So if there’s a possibility of moving a party further to our point of view, that’s already got some power, it would be ludicrous to ignore that.

 

[1:18:34]

 

Mark Collett: I concur.

 

And I think what you said there the term “ludicrous”, I don’t think that is an over exaggeration. You know, the thing is, what people have got to remember is over the last 5, 10 years, Farage has fundamentally, I’m not saying completely, but has fundamentally come in our direction to a large degree. And I keep stressing this point because it does need stressing. Nigel Farage was talking about things in this electoral cycle and addressing those issues in a way that the BNP at its height did not. You know, so the British National Party Party, when it won elections, never said, “we need to start deporting people”. That was a point that internally we were briefed, do not bring that up!

 

In fact, when I was in the British National Party, the British National Party changed its policy. The British National Party changed its policy from compulsory repatriation to voluntary repatriation and actually downplayed that on its website.

 

So there was a complete change in our approach to deportations, whether they would be illegal immigrants, etcetera, because it wasn’t a selling point.

 

In fact, at the time, people in the BNP felt that talking about repatriation would lose us votes. Now Farage is openly talking about deporting, in his words, “all illegal immigrants”. Well, that’s further to the Right than the BNP was when it won power in 2009. Well, it won two MEPs. It didn’t win power. Won two MEPs. That tells you something that I think is very important, that these people can be brought in our way and as a pressure group on their fringes.

 

Because, look, there are people in Reform who watch these shows. There are people in Reform that used to share my tweets. There are people in Reform that listen to Morgoth, follow Keith Woods, know about the JQ. And there was all that hullabaloo before the election that a number of people in Reform were all openly saying:

 

“What was the point in going to war with Germany? It was a waste of time, didn’t benefit us. Load of crap!”

 

That is unprecedented in British politics to have a party with Parliamentary seats where the membership and the candidates are openly discussing things that we might discuss tonight because somebody sent us a Superchat.

 

The Woodlander: Yeah, I completely agree. Like I said, I joined the Conservative Party in 97 to see if it was possible to take a party that had been crushed and move it to the Right. What I found was that actually at grassroots level, you didn’t really need to. They were actually pretty Right anyway. But the upper echelons of the Conservative Party had been there far too long. The beauty with Reform is that they haven’t. They haven’t and they haven’t got a stronghold on Parliament yet. They’re going to need more MP’s. I would rather those MP’s were our guys. I would rather the people running their think tanks were our guys. I would rather the people that running the business clubs and the forums and the Reform associations were our guys. Okay? And you don’t have to go there and cuck. You’ll find that 90% of the people you talk to in Reform are the same as us. Okay?

 

Like you said, they would retweet you and they would watch Morgoth, and the talking points would be the same. It’s only at that top level that they’ve toned it down. And I know Farage is not our guy, and I know Tice definitely isn’t our guy! But they’re going to need more people. And if the people they need are us, then again, it’s ludicrous not to take that opportunity.

 

Mark Collett: I agree. And look, I’m not saying this is the route for most people. I’m saying this is the route for people who absolutely want to don that suit, shirt and tie and knock on doors every night for the next four years to pave the way for an electoral victory.

 

Now, I know who Jez 9999 is, and I’m telling you now, no offence, mate, but you are absolutely not putting on a suit, shirt and tie and knocking on doors every night of the week for the next four or five years!

 

So this wouldn’t even apply to you. [chuckling] This applies to a specific type of young guys, probably in his mid twenties, like I was when I did that. He’s got all the energy in the world and genuinely believes in that kind of change. As a 43 year old guy with what is effectively a wife, absolutely a young daughter, and all the sort of problems and trials and tribulations that brings. I don’t have the time to be knocking on doors, you know, four or five nights of the week like I used to when I was a much younger man. But there are young revolutionary minded men who might do that.

 

Anyway, Merry Englander gave her $5. Thank you much. He said “donation”. Thank you my friend. John Skywalker gave $6 and he said:

 

“Watched your film review of Munich. As for why the lead character by Eric Banner questions his actions, I think Spielberg made him sympathetic to appeal to gentiles in the audience and any hesitation they may have fighting the War on Terror. Ultimately, I think pro-zionist Spielberg was to say, do what must be done. This can be seen in the final shot of the Twin Towers and the text, ‘nine of the eleven terrorists were killed’. Selling gentiles on their methods is also done in their book Rise and Kill Them First. I recommend reading it if you haven’t done so already. Really gives you their mindset.”

 

Well, I haven’t read that book and thank you so much for the Superchat.

 

Also, I was cheekily while Woodlander was talking, re-watching the end of the film then, because I actually didn’t notice that usually I noticed little things like that, but I didn’t notice that at the end of Munich they had the Twin Towers and 9/11 up on the screen. I mean, that that is just absolute sort of mental games at their finest!

 

Woodlander, have you seen Munich? Did you enjoy it?

 

[125:54]

 

The Woodlander: I haven’t seen it, no. It’s on my watch list. I don’t watch a lot of telly, don’t watch a lot of films, to be honest.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I hated the film, so you’re not missing much. It was horrible and there were certain scenes in it that actually made me feel quite sick. I didn’t enjoy it.

 

Glen19, gave $5. No, he gave $6. No, he gave $9 over multiple Superchats.

 

So I’m going to read them all together as one. Thank you so much, he said:

 

“Sad to say, Mr Collett, I don’t think anything political was gained from the riots, but it appears that they will copy what happened in the US with January the 6th people. Arrest and jail those involved, whether actively or passively. What do you think?

 

“I don’t think waiting for a race war to break out after demographics becomes worse will happen. Many will do what persecuted populations do in the past have done and emigrate. If nothing changes in the West, there’ll be mass emigration. Even those that go to the third world. Many falsely believe it’s impossible to take up residency and employment in foreign countries because there is a global conspiracy against White people.”

“As someone who worked and lived in different countries in Asia, I can say this is very false. When I was assigned to work in India by my employer, there were White South Africans in the gated community I lived in that play professional sports on Indian teams, ‘gori’, term for loose White women dancers for the film industry there and others. The Japanese media is largely not available in English, but they use western immigrants as examples on the media of the slowly changing Japan. Just like in this article.”

 

You can read the article there in the Superchat. I’ll answer this bit by bit, then I’ll throw it over to Woodlander.

 

Firstly, I think you’re absolutely correct! These riots have become the British January 6th. And that’s a very, very astute observation. I don’t think anything political was gained from them. I warned people not to go and get involved. I said this would happen and I said:

 

“Look, stay out of any trouble, you know, organise yourself in a peaceful manner.”

 

Now, I also think people who, when the writing broke out, started to talk about a race war were idiots. There isn’t going to be a race war. It’s much more likely that these kind of events will increase. And rather than a race war, we will end up in a Northern Ireland style situation where you have segregated communities, peace lines, and you end up in a situation where there are White British areas, there are Muslim areas, there are black areas, and there will be some mixing because there has been some interbreeding, but largely you will see sort of sectarianism, but on racial grounds.

 

And people who constantly fantasize about a race war. There has been no race war in South Africa. And that is far more brutal and far further down the road than we are here. I think we’re more likely to see sectarianism.

 

Now, the issue about emigrating, it’s something we’ve discussed tonight. I believe emigration will be something that is increasingly on the table for normal White Brits and it’s already happening.

 

So when they tell you that 1.5 million people, 90% plus of those are non-White, came to Britain last year, but net migration was about 800,000. The only reason net migration is 800,000 is not because 700,000 of those non-Whites went back. It’s because 700,000 White Britons went to live in Spain, Thailand, Vietnam, Serbia. Some will now be going to Russia, some will be going to Italy, some will be going to the south of France.

 

And this is why Farage’s Net Zero is not enough, because Farage’s Net Zero would basically legislate for a situation where 1.5 million non-White migrants arrived and 1.5 million White Brits left. And he’d call that a success! Well, that is not a success. That is replacement on steroids!

 

And we need to be mindful of this emigration because I know numerous people that I have met that I have shaken hands with that. Some of them I call good friends who are now living specifically in the Far East. That seems to be a real destination. Look at James Goddard. James Goddard at the moment is doing great shows. He’s got some great social media posts. He’s more politically active in terms of content creation than he’s ever been. And he’s doing it all from Thailand.

 

I don’t know if you want to comment on any of that Woodlander. Obviously, we’ve touched on stuff like this tonight, but over to you.

 

The Woodlander: With the emigration thing, it’s not for me. What I might do is look at a property abroad, but I’m not planning on moving full-time myself. I can completely understand the draw, especially with what’s going on in this country. The riots. No, they didn’t do anything political. I think they were allowed to happen as well. I think that the system has designed a society where an atrocity like that was going to happen at some point in time. They knew there would be a response, only this time they didn’t go all out to try and stop it! They allowed it to happen, so that they could do what they’re doing now.

 

So it was kind of obvious what was going to happen. It was local people. It wasn’t a “far-Right” organised thing. These protests weren’t organised. It was local people in different areas that were just sick and tired of what’s happening. And sadly, the government was waiting for that, and it fanned the flames.

 

And now it’s got its enemy. Now it can point and say:

 

“You are the enemy!”

 

And that’s all we’ve heard is about the “hideous far-Right”. They’re not far-Right. These are just local British people that are sick to the back teeth! And they’re ending up in prison. It’s a sad state of affairs. So no, riots didn’t do anything.

 

[1:32:35]

 

Mark Collett: And look, I’m going to go further than Woodlander here, and this might be unpopular, but strap yourself in for a hot take!

 

Not only didn’t the riots do anything, I believe that the government, Starmer himself, and the police, dealt with it in such a hamfisted way, they stoked tensions, angered people and more people came out. If Starmer had come out and attempted to reason with people, calmed them, talked about their totally justifiable fears about mass immigration, talk about the fact that Britain’s southern border does need to be policed. He could have even talked about it from a Left-wing perspective, like:

 

“We need to clamp down on people smuggling. There’s multiple victims in all this. But I understand your concerns.”

 

Most of those riots would not have been as bad, if they’d have even turned into riots at all! He stoked that. And he spoke to people in a way that was going to get that response. He then let those riots continue for several days. And when they’d been enough, there was then a choreograph, astroturfed and well funded response that will have cost tens, if not hundreds of thousands of anti-racist demonstrations paid for by the unions, choreographed everyone with the same signs, with all the same slogans on.

 

You know, those things are expensive. If you’re buying, you know, sort of 30 or so Corex boards all printed up, you probably get them for about five quid each at a decent size. Then you’ve got the wood to go on the back of them and all the rest, you’ve got somebody making them. There will have been somewhere, a production line producing those things are probably, you know, somewhere like 8, 9, 10 quid a piece, thousands of them being produced, shipped out all over the country by couriers or even by by same day couriers. Or even by union vehicles. All of that was choreographed.

 

So, number one, you have the prime minister laying down the law.

 

Number two, you have people baited into the trap.

 

And number three, you have the media rejoicing when the anti-racists come out en masse and put a stop to the evil far-Right:

 

“And because there were so many anti-racists, that’s the mood of the nation. So the only thing we can do is go along with the mood of the people now and punish the far-Right!”

 

To me, a lot of this looked like it was presented as some kind of theatrical event or even a pantomime. I don’t know if you’ve got anything to add to that, mate.

 

The Woodlander: No, I agree. I think, I said right at the beginning, this was done by a playbook. They were waiting for the response. It could have been in six months time that this atrocity had happened. They wanted that response by the British people so that they can do exactly what they’re doing now! So they can bring in legislation, so that they can start putting people in prison and set precedents for the reasons.

 

And it’s going to make things very much more difficult for us moving forward. You’re gonna have to watch what you say online. You’re gonna have to watch what you say in real life. Yeah. They wanted this to happen and they were just waiting for an excuse. It just so happened that it happened really early into his premiership.

 

But I think everything they’re doing was already done. It was already written down. They knew how they were gonna do it. The police knew how they were gonna handle it. It may look ham fisted. I think it was done on purpose. I honestly do! I think they handled the thing badly on purpose.

 

Mark Collett: I completely concur.

 

So we’ll move on from there. Dsallen7 gave $15. Thank you so much! He said:

 

“The UK government took a break from locking up their own citizens for standing in the wrong place to arrest journalist Richard Medhurst under terrorism charges for being critical of Israel. Two sides of the same coin.”

 

Well, that’s the other thing. Richard Medhurst is not a journalist. And you might be saying, what:

 

“Do you mean, Mark? He’s not a journalist?”

 

A journalist is now officially someone who gets a special little card from the state and is a member of the club. So if Richard Medhurst had been a card carrying journalist, he could not have been arrested for the things that he was arrested for. He was arrested because he is not a card carrying journalist. He’s an independent truth seeker. And independent truth seekers are now being rebranded as “misinformation agents”. That’s the problem!

 

And I know. Look, I know somebody might clip that out of context to make out like I’m insulting him. I’m absolutely not insulting Richard Medhurst.

 

I think what’s happened to him is absolutely scandalous! But what I’m saying is that is the way they do it.

 

[1:37:43]

 

The Woodlander: Exactly that again. I said it right at the beginning. What they’re doing is they’re saying:

 

“We’re the government. We tell you the truth! Anything else is misinformation.”

 

And now they’ve gone one step further and said:

 

“By the way, misinformation is a criminal act. So we will arrest you!”

 

Yeah, it’s not looking good! I think we should look into how you get press credentials. It’s not that difficult. If you’ve got a publication, you can apply for them. So, yeah, I’ll look into that. Because, I mean, I was accredited. I had press credentials before, I ran a magazine. I used to go to the motor show free of charge, go to press days, bike shows and whatever.

 

But you’re right, you do need to be accredited. We should look into it.

 

Mark Collett: I was just looking at Richard Medhurst there. He apparently isn’t allowed to say exactly what’s happening to him either, which is another scandal. Imagine being dragged away by the police, you know, locked in a cell, interrogated for 24 hours, then released with some kind of gagging order.

 

So you can’t even explain to people what happened to you. That is something that you’d hear about in the Soviet Union. They’d talk about that in North Korea, wouldn’t they? They’d say:

 

“Oh, a guy was arrested in North Korea. They dragged him away from his family. They returned him 48 hours later in clothes made of paper because they’d taken all his clothes away. All his personal items were seized, and he wasn’t even allowed to tell his family what he’d been arrested for. Oh, my God! The things that happen in North Korea!”

 

And you’re like:

 

“No, that’s what happened in Britain. The guy’s name is Richard Medhurst.”

 

It’s an absolute scandal! I’ve just followed him on. Well, an account that looks like it might belong to me. Just followed him on Twitter. [chuckling] ThinRedLine, gave $14. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“I think the system is making a mistake with these tyrannical laws. It will only wake more people up.”

 

I’ll throw that one over to you, Woodlander. Is this going to wake people up or is this going to scare people?

 

The Woodlander: Both! It will wake people up, but not enough. Really not enough. Again, I think a lot of what we’re seeing now was already game-played four years ago.

 

And if you want to see how the mass of the public react, right, we saw it then, we saw it then. The government said:

 

“This is the truth! Everything else is misinformation. Don’t worry about your lying eyes and seeing that there are no people dropping down dead in the street. We’re telling you this is the truth and we want you to basically attack anybody that isn’t toeing the line.”

 

And the public did. The public did! They shouted at you for not wearing a mask, they pointed fingers at you, right? They were the ones grassing you up for going for a walk. The general public went and toed the line. And sadly, as much as these new laws will wake a lot of people up, it won’t wake enough up.

 

Mark Collett: Do the worst thing about it? I remember covering this at the time and this was something that I was sort of like. I was just amazed when it happened. There were some complete arse who reported their neighbour to the police for not coming out and clapping for the NHS.

 

Now, at that point you are literally living in a Soviet style stage. And you can imagine it now, people looking up and down the road like panicking, like:

 

“Oh God, what if I’m the one that stops clapping first? You know? What if I’m the one that is the first to go back into my house when the clapping ends?”

 

And that’s how it became. And I remember, I never took part in all that crap, but it did affect people. And all these things are carefully choreographed attempts to mentally condition people into a response and into thinking, “are you a good guy?” A good guy means that you’re a conformist. Are you a bad guy? Bad guy equals freethinker. Simple as that.

 

NightNationReview gave $14. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“That is 100% what they are doing. They are criminalizing the dissent of the British people with nebulous terms. It’s horrifying to watch from America. The international overlords ultimately want the same for us too. Evil occupations!”

 

Well, I completely agree. Truthforge gave $11 thank you so much! And said:

 

“I support your efforts. Thank you for the content and the truth!”

 

Thank you so much! It’s very much appreciated. Anti-Mattoid gave $26 thank you so much! And said:

 

“Donation.”

 

Well, thank you for your kind donation. DerCheruska gave $5. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“Good episode, good guest.”

 

Well, thank you very much. ThinRedLine said:

 

“In my opinion, …”

 

Though we’ve already done that. We did that one out of order. Penelope Maynard gave a phenomenally generous $200!

 

“Thank you so much to dear Mark and Woodlander. A salient stream, no truer words. Many thanks for your wisdom. Best, Penelope. NB: Mark, shall I email you at mark@thefallofwesternman.com? Thanks.”

 

Yes, you absolutely should. And you’ve been very, very generous! If you live in the UK, I’d be more than willing to sort of have dinner with you or answer your questions personally or send you a gift or something for your generosity. So thank you so much! Milos M gave some Odysee tokens and he said:

 

“My opinion on this is I don’t approve of foreigners coming here because they have been backstabbed and betrayed by their own government. But I understand them. A man in search of an ideal woman, a couple moving over to escape woke social and economical woke totalitarianism. But that is not problem solving.”

 

Look, this is what I’m going to say. I’m not somebody who ever wants to leave this country. I’m not somebody that feels comfortable abroad. I sometimes like going abroad, and I’ve been to beautiful countries. I loved my last trip to Finland and the family I stayed with. I loved my trip to Latvia. That’s probably one of the most beautiful places I’ve ever been. Mexico was interesting, but quite scary. [chuckling] And generally, I have enjoyed seeing other parts of the world, and certain parts of those world, the world I have liked, but it’s never been my home and I would never want to be an exile.

 

[1:44:31]

 

But again, I cannot condemn a man who looks at his family and says:

 

“I’ve got a wife and three beautiful kids. There’s a little Italian village that still picks their own olives, makes their own wine, and they’re selling houses there for 5,000 pounds each. And we’re going to move there and we’re going to go to church every Sunday, and my daughters are going to go to the little Catholic school, and I can work remotely from there. And the amount of money I’ll have will give us a quality of life we’ve never had before. My wife will then be a stay at home mom, and we can afford to have, you know, another child.”

 

Can I really knock that man? No, I can’t! And I can’t knock that man because this country is so, it’s becoming so bad for people! And it’s not just so bad in terms of the migration, the anti-White laws, the anti-White violence. But it’s just general quality of life, you know, quality of life.

 

Now, look, I’m off, I am largely off the McDonald’s train now. I’ve been saying, I make my own burgers, I cook my own chips. The best thing to cook chips in, people say, is beef dripping. They’re wrong! If you mix 50% beef dripping with 50% lard and cook your chips in that, it’s even better. You get the best of both worlds! I’ve been trying it I am one of those freaks that weighs it all out and has done all these different things. So I am cooking my own food.

 

But the fact is, for normal people, going to McDonald’s is a treat at the weekend with the kids. A Happy Meal used to be 1.99, it’s now 3.50. You’re talking a 75% increase in price. Have wages gone up 75%? I remember when petrol was a pound a litre. It’s now one pound 40. That’s a 40% rise in petrol. And it’s across the board, gas, electric, computer components. You know, if you’re building a new computer now, cost a bloody earth. You know, everything is going up like that.

 

So when people look at their basket of goods and they’re just nipped out for bread, a bit of butter a bottle of orange juice and maybe a couple of cream buns for dessert, and they’re spending 12, 13 quid and they’re thinking:

 

“I remember them. That would have been 4.50!”

 

People are now thinking:

 

“Well, why wouldn’t I go to Thailand, where for 4.50, me and my wife can go out to a restaurant and both have a beautiful bowl of beef noodles!”

 

I’m not condoning it, because it wouldn’t be my home.

 

And that’s why I never want to leave here. I never want to not be on English soil unless it’s for a little holiday, but I can understand it. And I think a few years ago, I would have been a lot more negative about people.

 

In fact, I was a lot more negative about people leaving a few years ago. But I’m probably less negative now than I ever have been, because I understand it.

 

I mean, I know you don’t want to leave, Woodlander, but are you negative towards people leaving?

 

The Woodlander: No. It’s actually an interesting topic, though, because it’s one of those ones that gets thrown back at me, which is:

 

“Your mum and dad were immigrants over in Spain, and yet you don’t like immigrants over here!”

 

And to some extent they’re actually right. But there is a difference. The difference is, I don’t think we would have a problem in England if we had a French quarter, or an Italian area, or a German area. These cultures, these ethnicities, even the Polish to some extent. And I’ll be honest, when I first moved to the town I grew up in, there was a large Polish community. But you wouldn’t have known it because they had fully integrated. It was small, but they had fully integrated.

 

The Europeans have a similar ethnicity and a similar culture throughout. And it can work quite well. The Brits move over to Spain and within a few years, the town they’re living in is little England, right? An English bloke buys a pub, it does Sunday dinners, bloke buys a fish and chip shop, bloke opens an English bookshop. Within to long, it’s, … But the Spanish don’t really mind because the cultures are very similar. The English still go to the Spanish markets, they get on with their Spanish neighbours, everyone rubs along quite well.

 

Different matter when it’s the North Africans moving into Spain, the culture is completely different. There’s a lot of criminality. The Spanish don’t like it. So it’s the same over here. We haven’t got a problem with communities of Europeans. We’ve got a problem with communities of Africans, Asians, Middle Eastern, ethnicities. The cultures clash with us and the ethnicities clash with us.

 

So it’s an interesting topic, but I won’t rattle on all night about it.

 

[1:50:19]

 

Mark Collett: I’ll say this as well, woodland and this might make you smile. But I’ve never felt like I was going to be mugged or stabbed walking through Chinatown either! [chuckling]

 

The Woodlander: You laugh! I mean, the thing is, we’ve always had Chinese communities here. I remember going to London and my dad saying:

 

“Well this is Chinatown.”

 

And it was all full of Chinese and whatever, and it was you could walk around and it was fine, I understand, tucked round the back with some opium dens and whatever. But we didn’t really have a problem with these ethnicities. There were parts of Bedford, which were largely Italian. They had ice cream parlours and Italian restaurants and pizza places. This is going back in the sixties and seventies. There was never really any problem. Okay? So these ethnicities and these cultures actually rub along, okay? Which is telling, isn’t it? Because that’s not what happens now.

 

Mark Collett: Well, that’s the thing. And I’ll also say this, [chuckling] it is a specific problem with certain types of culture. Now I don’t want, you know, an entire city’s end to be Chinatown. I don’t want that. It was more of a throwaway comment. But the fact is certain cultures do present more problems than others.

 

RoryHerbert gave $5. Thank you. Sid:

 

“Dear Mark, could you ask Woodlander how he defines a fascist chicken? Do they lay eggs with 1930s European symbols on them or does he have an alternative explanation?”

 

The Woodlander: Hi, Rory. How are you? I mean, that’s really because I was called out as being far-Right. And they actually went on to say, you know, he talks about homesteading and raising chickens. How is talking about homesteading and raising chickens far-Right? They never define this thing. They just use it as a label. You know, I have a battalion of fascist chickens, apparently!

 

Mark Collett: I like the idea of that. AlbionForever gave an update on Richard Medhurst and he says:

 

“As soon as he stepped off the plane at Heathrow, he was arrested. It was clearly premeditated sting operation.”

 

Indeed. Jewy von Swindlestein gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Great stream, guys. Keep it the good work. I’m convinced this collectivizing idea will work. I can think of another (((group))) that have done this for a very long time with huge success.”

 

Thank you. [chuckling] British Camp, [chuckling] gave $25. Thank you so much, my friend. He said:

 

“British people don’t go to Spain on a dinghy and expect to be given a house for free. Great show tonight!”

 

Well, I agree, but also when Brits do go to places, they generally don’t start stabbing people or robbing them off the back of mopeds or snatching mobile phones. We’re not people that go to places and groom the local children!

 

When people talk about Brits in Spain, it’s a false equivalence. You know, you don’t get Africans arriving in Britain with millions of pounds in the bank, buying property and doing up a local building, turning it into an African pub and selling food to other Africans. It’s not like that! They come here, they usually jump the social housing queue. They arrive in dinghy’s.

 

This idea that Brits going to Spain or Brits buying a property in Serbia is some way equivalent [chuckling] to dinghies full of people arriving on the southern coast is just absolute nonsense!

 

I don’t know if you want to add to that because I’m sure your parents didn’t arrive in Spain and jumped straight on the welfare system, did they?

 

The Woodlander: No, but it was interesting for me to look at that. And I spoke about this on Tasob, actually, which was that what happens is cultures replicate themselves.

 

So when the English get to Spain, they look around and they go:

 

“This is great, but we’d like a chip shop.”

 

So they open a chip shop. The Spanish haven’t got a problem with this. And nor would we have a problem when the Spanish come here and they say:

 

“We’re going to up a little tapas bar.”

 

That’s not an issue. Okay. I know it’s not all about food. But the cultures get on! They rub together perfectly and that’s what matters.

 

And it was interesting to see that the North Africans coming into Spain were not treated like the British. And it was because of the way they acted and those cultures didn’t get on.

 

Mark Collett: Agreed. Wife Waffen gave $7. Thank you, my dear. And she says:

 

“Have a great week!”

 

Thank you very much. It’s Okay to be a Nationalist gave 14.88. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Anyone who wants a lovely white pill should watch the Woodlanders latest video. Great work, Mark and Simon, thank you for everything you do.”

 

Well, thank you so much! VM gave $5. Thank you very much. And he said something similar. He said:

 

“The eagle has landed. Enjoyed Woodlanders latest video. Mark, what are your thoughts on setting up a legal White advocacy division of PA or via something with Robin Tilbrook’s team? Could be something we need. Keep up the great work!”

 

People keep asking this. We’ve already got this. We’ve got the Workers of England, Union. I work with them at least once a month, either by pushing somebody in their direction or by actually working on these cases with them. So often when somebody who is a nationalist contacts me and says:

 

“Look, I’ve got a problem, I’m in trouble at work. What should I do?”

 

My immediate response is:

 

“Are you a member of the Workers of England, Union?”

 

Usually they say no. I say:

 

“Join them immediately!”

 

The next thing I say is:

 

“Send me all the information about the trouble you’re going through.”

 

And I sometimes spend hours going through these cases with people. There’s these people online that say:

 

“What does Mark do all day? He sits playing Mario Kart for 8 hours, then streams for 2 hours!”

 

Like, I wish I spent 8 hours a day gaming! I’m up at six every morning answering my emails or working on something which prevents me answering my emails, like scripting a video.

 

[1:56:48]

 

And once I’ve done that, I’m usually tied up on the phone. I can sometimes spend 4 hours in some days, like half my working day on the phone. And recently I’ve spent hours at a time working through debating techniques with several people who have been in employment tribunals. It’s something we already do.

 

If you’ve been watching my social media posts, who came on a stream with myself and Laura to tell people how to deal with the police? It was Robin Tilbrook. We actually have a book, or a booklet called, Don’t Say a Thing, A Practical Guide to Dealing with the Police. That was written by myself and Robin Tilbrook, a practicing legal professional. We already have legal advocacy with an organisation that’s very close to PA, that we work hand in hand with i’ll tell you this now. The first ever case in this country of somebody taking an employer to court for sacking them for refusing to wear a mask was a lady called Laura who was working for, I think it was Volkswagen. She was sacked for refusing to wear the mask. She rang me on a Sunday evening, because I’ve known her for years. She’s been a friend of mine for years. She rang me on a Sunday evening all flustered!:

 

“Mark, what am I going to do? I’ve got the first stage of my employment tribunal in the morning. I haven’t prepared. I don’t know what I’m doing. I’ve not got anyone representing me.”

 

I put her in touch with Robin Tilbrook. He took the call that evening, the Monday morning before a tribunal. He briefed her on what to say. She went into the tribunal. It was postponed until she got advocacy. They won that case. It was a landmark case. That was PA, Robin Tilbrook of the English Democrats and the Workers of England, Union all working together to help somebody. We’ve been doing this for years.

 

PA went slightly adrift when an absolute wrongun in our midst tried to force all this, “elections or nothing”, upon us. That wasn’t anything I wanted. And you look back at the earliest streams, community building and White advocacy, that is what we are now. No one’s coming in and pushing us in a different direction. I should have stuck to my guns and done that’s what I spend my days doing. That’s what I’m most passionate about. That’s what we can win on. And we should keep doing that. And we’ve already had massive victories.

 

You know, people say:

 

“What have PA achieved?”

 

Well, we’ve had numerous asylum seeker centres shut down, numerous Drag Queen Story Hour events stopped. We’ve helped numerous people who were going to lose their jobs. We’ve set legal precedents and we’re going to keep doing that. And we’re going to keep working with Woodlander. We’re going to keep working with Workers of England, Union. We’re going to keep working with independents who are fighting for things at local level. We’re going to keep doing the food banks. We’re going to keep doing the litter picks. All these things are things that we can do and make real change.

 

Anyway, last Superchat is ScaredyCat, $4. Thank you so much, my dear. And she says:

 

“Hi, Woodlander and Mark, best wishes.”

 

And that brings us to the end of the show. Woodlander, my friend, you have the final word because you’ve been an amazing guest as always.

 

The Woodlander: Well, thank you, Mark. Thank you very much for having me on. It’s always a pleasure. Again, apologies for turning up late. My fault. Thank you to the chat and everybody watching. I think everybody is now in accordance. Everybody who matters is pushing in the right direction. We’re going to start seeing success from both PA, from the Woodlander Initiative and other groups which are starting up as well.

 

We’re going to start seeing success because we’re going down roads that can lead us to success, and not futile paths that have been tried a hundred times before.

 

So I would urge people to get involved with PA, check out the Woodlander Initiative. We’re moving forward in the right direction.

 

And I’ll hand it back to you, Mark.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you so much, my friend. We’ve got one last Superchat, $5 from Lulu. Thank you so much, my dear. She said:

 

“Great stream tonight, guys. You’ve covered a lot of good points. Keep up the fight for British nationalism.”

 

Thank you so much!

 

And I’ve got to say this. Woodland is a great guest and he’s a great guest because he not only gives great takes, but he’s a man of action. He’s a guy that said, we need to do something and he did it. Just like we said we need to do PA. We need to build a community. And we did it! Just like the Workers of England, Union guys said, we need a union and they built one. And that’s what we need! We need people who are willing to get up and run with their idea and do something fresh and think outside the box.

 

If you wrote a book on British nationalism, it could easily be called “A Century of Failure”, because it has never achieved through electoral means what has been achieved on the Continent.

 

However, for the first time, in my time in nationalism, people are genuinely coming up with new ideas, with new ways forward and are actually breaking new ground. And that, for me, is far more exciting than the idea of repeating the same thing that we’ve been doing since 1945 and failing at! This is an exciting time.

 

As I said, there will always be challenges along the way, but the fact we’re doing something new is important. So massive thank you to Woodlander. And a special thank you for all the positivity he has brought here this evening.

 

And as I said, I do believe the tide is turning in British nationalism with people now thinking outside the box. And a lot of that is down to this man here.

 

So thank you to Woodlander, thank you to everybody who has donated so very generously tonight. And a massive thank you as always to this incredible audience and this wonderful community. I love you all. Thank you so much!

 

We’ll be back next week. Eric Striker returns Wednesday, same place, same time, 07:00 pm. Thank you, everybody. Love you all. Good night. Stay safe. Keep fighting. Thank you.

 

[2:03:47]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 8/22/2024 = 509)

Mark Collett
4 hours ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

Matt Hammond
1 hour ago
Surely there is some merit to the argument that the police are no longer a legitimate police force. Didn’t they break the social contract a long time ago. They are clearly at war with the population. I mean, what is ‘law’ at the end of the day? Aren’t there laws against treason?

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@NatFlix
they will now

14Reasons
2 hours ago
cya hopefully red ice will show today

@MilosM.
2 hours ago
great stream good evening all

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@Ihtultu
yes

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
WANGHAF

NATFLIX
2 hours ago
RAHOWA

@Lulu
2 hours ago
great stream all the best

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
14

@dsallen7
2 hours ago
14

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
14

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
Excellent stream as always. Hails to Mark and Woodlander

@SerenaJB
2 hours ago
Great show.

Parken
2 hours ago
Good night! 1488

@Ihtultu
2 hours ago
Good evening everyone.

TruthForge
2 hours ago
OK, gotta go, remember what the magnet says, “Stay positive, it will attract the negative.”

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
Chin up, chest out folks. We’ll win

Dawn Browning
2 hours ago
MarkSimonModsLove Love to all you Beautifuls MWAH

@Ihtultu
2 hours ago

@14Reasons
we have chinese and indian nations 1billion+, imagine 1billion germans. what they would achieve…

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
GOOD NIGHT BROTHERS AND SISTERS

@Lulu
2 hours ago
night guys

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@BritishGammon
good night

@BritishGammon
2 hours ago
Great stream and chat. Night folks.

@BMC1488
2 hours ago

@MilosM.
Yes, indeed

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
OUR LAND, OUR FREEDOM, OUR FUTURE. Join The Woodlander Initiative folks. I’ve made friends for life from TWI

@Ihtultu
2 hours ago

@MilosM.
Hello neighbor. until Caesar beat Areovistus the celts were keeping the germans under check. after Caesar it went downhill for the celts and the germans started encroaching on the rhine frontier.

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@BMC1488
a lot of German descendants in Minnesota

@cheflad
2 hours ago
14 Deus Vult

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@MarkCollett
lol

@AlbionForever
2 hours ago

@MarkCollett
she’s too busy seeing the bedrooms

Oldgods
2 hours ago
Kudos

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
We Will win

Mark Collett
2 hours ago

@AlbionForever
109 legal cases, but not one of them has ever seen a court room lol

@BMC1488
2 hours ago

@TruthForge
Also Scandinavians in my area (Minnesota-USA)

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
Keep fighting Brothers and Sisters

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@Ihtultu
I don’t know the history as well as you seem to. I’ll take your word for it

@Lulu
2 hours ago
$5.00
Great stream tonight guys, youve covered alot of good points Keep up the fight for british nationalists

@AlbionForever
2 hours ago
But but but what about the bunny boiler and her legal cases? They’re about as real as a £7 note.

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@Ihtultu
I think Romans kept Germans more in check. Then Germans grew powerful and decided since Roman empire is not a thing anymore they should be new rulers of Europe. Which tbh, didn’t work out that well.

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@MilosM.
yes

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@TruthForge
I could go on gab fine. it should be 14reasons on gab. there is two profiles.message the one with 2k followers. the other one was due to a glitch thing. I’ll talk later today unless something comes up

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
#StopTheBoats

TruthForge
2 hours ago
Germans (much later) were the predominant genetic group that settled much of Northern America.

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@TruthForge
it also asks for your phone number

@Ihtultu
2 hours ago

@14Reasons
Hello mate. I would have to say that after 476 the germanic population exploded. until then they were kept under check by the celts. and the germans kept the slavs under check.

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@14Reasons
Germans were spread to much of what we call Europe.

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
Robin is a legend of a man

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
Arriving in an overloaded dinghy as a White person and expecting to be given free everything from the country you washed up on is an alien concept.

TruthForge
2 hours ago

@14Reasons
I don’t use telegram at the time. Don’t trust it because it drops image folders on my system.

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@Power_Blade
trainwreck

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
Mark works hard and he always answers his emails

TruthForge
2 hours ago

@14Reasons
Well, I just don’t know.

Hideaway Swamp
2 hours ago
The amount of White people emigrating to Thailand is at epidemic levels. Maybe Thailand will be our new ethnostate.

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@TruthForge
If you want to talk ,I’m on telegram if you want a link

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@AlbionForever
I would make that clear to him to keep his willy in the pants.

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@TruthForge
I haven’t been posting anything for a very long time now. I’d rather not start up on that platform yet . sorry

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@Carlota
the Germans were such a massive chunk of European demographics for so much of europes long term history. so

@AlbionForever
2 hours ago

@MilosM.
no lol

TruthForge
2 hours ago

@14Reasons
Hope on GAB and inform me. I just don’t know, you are correct. Maybe that’s why I see allegiance the way I do.

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@AlbionForever
isn’t Nativist married?

@AlbionForever
2 hours ago

@MilosM.
yeah. make sure none of them give him their phone number, it’ll never stop buzzing.

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@TruthForge
noseferatu types like Jonathan greenblat lol

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@theestonian
hahaha true, Brits are quite infamous as tourists.

ItsOkToBeANationalist
2 hours ago
$14.88
Anyone who wants a lovely white pill should watch the woodlander’S latest video. Great work Mark and Simon. Thank you for everything you do

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@AlbionForever
is he really? Then I better keep my eye on Chris Mitchell he seems to traveling a lot to EE.

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@TruthForge
you mean the 3% Asians in America ? aren’t they a ridiculously small amount in america ? you have no idea. try living around literal Asian ethnostate demographics in Canada

Hideaway Swamp
2 hours ago
China towns seemed harmless while they were a less economically and politically powerful minority. Go to San Francisco now and there is no place for Whites, but the Chinese own a ton of the city.

TruthForge
2 hours ago

@14Reasons
If Hollywood was honest about Mobs and criminality they would talk nonstop about La Kosher Nostra.

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@Apollo
yes it is ridicolous

@AlbionForever
2 hours ago
Nativist Concern arrived in Poland and jumped straight on Svetlana

@Apollo
2 hours ago
leftoids act like all foreigners are equivalent

TruthForge
2 hours ago
Maybe so, but the ones that move to the USA, at least for the moment, are typically good people to ally with. They often agree with White positive ideals due to their own racial awareness. Just my opinion.

@theestonian
2 hours ago
brits are known as quite horrible tourists though

14Reasons
2 hours ago
but according to Hollywood everywhere italians go, there is mobs and criminality and gangsters and murder

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@Carlota
In my area of coutnry is melting pot with Hungarians, Romanians, Croatians, Slovaks, Bosnians, Czechs, Germans, but apart of few very related to us, most of them have been okay and there are not any conflict on ethnical basis and no one is calling for it.

@AlbionForever
2 hours ago
How about Nativist going to Eastern Europe to shag the local birds?

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
yes

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
stream

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
Watch the Nazi Turkeys on Blackpilled

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@TruthForge
Asians who are on the side of pro Whites

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
based and police pilled haha

TruthForge
2 hours ago

@14Reasons
What is rare? Asians?

14Reasons
2 hours ago
far right is whites not going extinct . that’s what far right means .white survival

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@TruthForge
profoundly rare as anomalies. the high quality anomalies are exceptions. but again rare anomalies

@Lulu
2 hours ago
im scared go london tbh….but being british i need see the history musuem…tower of london etc

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
yes you get that in Spain, Italy as well

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
:laughing:

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@TruthForge
I don’t see in which areas their alliance can come into play.

TruthForge
2 hours ago
I think Asians should be whites allies. People can disagree.

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@Carlota
they were different phenotypes. you wouldn’t think that if you were only surrounded by one white phenotype.

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
Spanish police are baaaaaased. I had an incident with a looky looky man in Torrevieja. The police were on my side.

AngryGoyJ
2 hours ago
Asians don’t like whites either

TruthForge
2 hours ago
You had me at “Black Africans are alien.”

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@AlbionForever
so true

14Reasons
2 hours ago
I’d always say even different white phenotypes is too much change. we need 95% minimal Spanish in spane. no white phenotypes that are different. and no other non white phenotypes. everything’s so upside down

@BritishGammon
2 hours ago
$25.00
British people don’t go to Spain on a dinghy and expect to be given a house for free! Great show tonight.

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
Also you bring money and don’t mooch of the Spanish welfare system

@Ir0nW1LL
2 hours ago
Just say it ‘the turd world’

@AlbionForever
2 hours ago
I’ll take the Spanish anti-tourism protests seriously when they’re even more outraged about the African crime wave in Spain.

TruthForge
2 hours ago
Or, because the Spanish have been invaded so many times that they know this too will pass. 600 years under Muslim rule, and it’s still Spain, that’s something.

@cheflad
2 hours ago
When the Russian SMO is concluded, then Crimea is supposed to be quite nice ,if Putins offering

@Apollo
2 hours ago
British people and Spaniards are related peoples because they’re both European. Black Africans couldn’t be more alien.

@Jewy-Von-Swindelstein
2 hours ago
$5.00
Great stream guys, keep up the good work. I’m convinced this collectivising idea will work. I can think of another group that have done this for a very long time with huge success

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
and you never know if she is 15 or 50.

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
:space_resitas:

@AlbionForever
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
more like thighland

14Reasons
2 hours ago
white immigrants compared to non whites…sigh. the fact we even need to explain this is insanity

TruthForge
2 hours ago
Europe does not look safe.

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
i wouldn’t trust food from in Thailand. The waitress would’ve probably dipped her penis in it.

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@soundmoney
Afrikaaners should rather move back to Europe.

TruthForge
2 hours ago
South Africa does not look safe.

@Lulu
2 hours ago
i made myself home made cottage pie today….so much making ur own food so i agree with mark there

@soundmoney
2 hours ago
come home to South Africa, white man

14Reasons
2 hours ago
because Thailand is not full of your own people. it’s deranged

AngryGoyJ
2 hours ago
i eat tuna and rice and eggs so I can pay for non whites

@BMC1488
2 hours ago

@PenelopeMaynard7
:heart_with_ribbon:

14Reasons
2 hours ago
gaming is too expensive now too.100 bucks for a single game. screw that. not worth it

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
:laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Dawn Browning
2 hours ago
Rendering your own lard is well easy

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago

@Ir0nW1LL
love your English Bull Terrier

14Reasons
2 hours ago
3.50 lol. 20 for a combo in communist Canada

@PenelopeMaynard7
2 hours ago

@BMC1488
many thanks :sparkling_heart:

@cheflad
2 hours ago
i do Lard and Beef Dripping

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
time to make your own Redbull Mark

@noreplacement
2 hours ago
Beef dripping for me

@Ir0nW1LL
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
, Max Igan can’t praise it enough

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago

@MilosM.
end up getting beheaded on the internet. No thanks Mexico haha

Dawn Browning
2 hours ago

@PenelopeMaynard7

@PenelopeMaynard7
2 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
I’m humbled. you’re awesome as well :heart_with_ribbon:

TruthForge
2 hours ago
Well Richard is a dick.

Dawn Browning
2 hours ago
Penelope is AWESOME

@theicebergmelts
2 hours ago
“Britain ceded the right to call foreigners and immigrants “invaders” when it invaded 1/4 of the planet and built the largest empire in history.” – Richard Medhurst

TruthForge
2 hours ago
Language is tough here. I live in New Mexico. It’s been 3 cultures, Mexican, White and Indian, for hundreds of years. Telling people to deny their culture, centuries old, is fightin’ talk.

Dawn Browning
2 hours ago
Good Morning Beautifuls

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
not even soviet more like north Korea

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
lol

TruthForge
2 hours ago
Or maybe 2 1/2?

TruthForge
2 hours ago

@Glen19
One and a half.

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
covid did wake a lot of people up

@theicebergmelts
2 hours ago

@TruthForge
He is an antiwhite pos. During the riots in France last year he was celebrating all of it. I don’t care about his anti-zionism because he doesn’t even tell the truth about that anyway

TruthForge
2 hours ago

@MilosM.
I’ve often thought about moving to Mexico to get on welfare. Said no one eve.

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
to get kidnapped there lol

@BMC1488
2 hours ago
Yes indeed, Penelope is a fantastic supporter :thumbs_up:

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
i wouldn’t go to Mexico for a million quid

@RoryHerbert
2 hours ago

@MarkCollett
My wife was walking the dog and a neighbour said to her “you have to stop and clap for the NHS”. Crazy times.

Dawn Browning
2 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@Carlota
it seems consistent with all 1st generations. although if I leave somewhere I find it necessary to learn the language of the host, I doubt they would bow to my needs if I don’t.

TruthForge
2 hours ago
Why is it that everywhere whites went was invasion, but everyone else just migrates?

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
Good morning Australia

@noreplacement
2 hours ago
It will wake people up; till they turn on the telly

@AlbionForever
2 hours ago
0.03
They nicked Richard Medhurst as soon as he stepped off a plane at Heathrow. It was clearly a premeditated sting operation.

AngryGoyJ
2 hours ago
175 years of social equality with the negro. Atheism and enlightened Christianity has done its job. Far past gone

@Glen19
2 hours ago

@TruthForge
well they have two continents where Spanish is spoken. I can understand why

@Bres
2 hours ago
I don’t think the need for a native advocacy group would be on people’s lips as much without the government’s prejudiced reaction. And everyone can see it. Only silver lining, not much though, when your in a cell.

BOILING-FROG
2 hours ago
in Canada also often

TruthForge
2 hours ago

@Carlota
Lulz, here the Spanish don’t learn English.

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@MilosM.
all alien nations should not have our people going to live there. it damages every single nation . so called immigration corrupts and destroys everywhere on earth.

TruthForge
2 hours ago
Imagine, the USSR never fell, just expanded.

@AlbionForever
2 hours ago
They nicked him as soon as he stepped off a plane at Heathrow

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
that is a good idea

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@Glen19
immoral

@Glen19
2 hours ago

@14Reasons
The governments invite them here and you also have Western governments who are happy to see them leave. No one likes immigration but governments & businesses don’t care

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
he is not system aproved

TruthForge
2 hours ago
Can’t we all just get along?

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@TruthForge
there is allot more than just smiles lol

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@Glen19
I say the same with all non whites bringing their kids to western nations. it’s consistent

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@14Reasons
depends what nation.

NATFLIX
2 hours ago

@MarkGreen
I saw more 20 year old girls at the Rotherham riot than far right activists.

TruthForge
2 hours ago
The Justice Party was also supposedly ruined by infighting.

14Reasons
2 hours ago
I understand the premise of moving a worse off western nation but to head to a racial alien civilization and nation…it’s not a solution. it’s purely a deranged and brainwashed reaction

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@MarkCollett
is there any data on this where 1.5 Britons gone?

14Reasons
2 hours ago
we have a plague of White men heading to Asia. very disturbing . then they get the fish head wife.

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@MaxZet
you have to be smart about it but I believe it is possible

TruthForge
2 hours ago

@Bres
It’s natural, and you are correct. Except where forced integration is funded.

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@Bres
that’s the nature of reality and race. everyone desires to be with their own

@Bres
2 hours ago
I think we already have unconscious segregation amongst the masses.

@MaxZet
2 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
They do. However if the teachers or staff are considered too “extreme”, even when it comes to the governments pets, the muslims. The school inspection steps up and can force the school to close down.

@WhiteWalker
2 hours ago

@MilosM.
exactly

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
but SA is only 8 % White people

TruthForge
2 hours ago

@14Reasons
I never understand that infighting. I guess I’m on the outside looking in and all I see is the smiles.

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@Glen19
even worse bringing a white family and little children to an alien nation. it’s profoundly immoral and very wrong

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@Carlota
are they native (white) Brits? xd also that reminds me of ever inreasing number of Russians, who did integrate but didn’t assimilate, they mostly keep to themselves.

AngryGoyJ
2 hours ago
Delusional

14Reasons
2 hours ago

@TruthForge
it’s relentless infighting.

@Glen19
2 hours ago

@14Reasons
I wasn’t talking about single Men emigrating. families do too. Pewdiepie isn’t the only one who does this.

TruthForge
2 hours ago
I keep wondering when ALL the pro-White content creators, and their supporting audiences will form like Voltron and destroy the ZOG-O-BOT.

Teutonic Truth
2 hours ago
No closets for Queers. Deport Only.

@cheflad
2 hours ago
the Rotherham thing was strange ,lots of Counter Jihad mob was there stalking things.

NATFLIX
2 hours ago
I was at the Rotherham hotel protest a few years ago and nothing came of it. After the riot that hotel was emptied the next day.

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@MaxZet
I am sure it is, anyway I suppose it would be a small shool with only a few teachers

@BillAtheling
2 hours ago
Exactly Mark, both speakers tonight have been spot on…

@MilosM.
2 hours ago
Me, I have a meeting with Chris Mitchell lmao in late September. He did mention he doesn’t like Mark much. But he asked me are there any welding jobs available here. I dont know what to think about it.

TruthForge
2 hours ago
You really have a hard on for Musk, don’t you?

Teutonic Truth
2 hours ago
Kissing celebrities’ asses like Musks’ is what got us in this situation.

TruthForge
2 hours ago
Riots work IF, and only IF, the government endorses that side.

@MaxZet
2 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
I really hope it is.

NATFLIX
2 hours ago
When blacks riot they get everything they ask for. Riots work.

TruthForge
2 hours ago
January 6th anyone?

14Reasons
2 hours ago
not that it was going to happen. that it’s still happening frequently and never stopped for decades. a chronic evil

14Reasons
2 hours ago
how is what you predicted much different from a race war lol

@MilosM.
2 hours ago
Race war never happened in history (okay maybe in Rhodesia).

@MilosM.
2 hours ago
So

@MarkCollett
essentially you’d get civil war.

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
It will make more people hostile to the system

TruthForge
2 hours ago
Yes, him and Fonzie.

@MilosM.
2 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
do you think he raped Heather O’Rourke?

TruthForge
2 hours ago

@MaxZet
I had something similar, but it was in the street more than a home.

@MaxZet
2 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
They would have to be.

@MaxZet
2 hours ago

@TruthForge
Indeed it is. That is why i strongly prefer homeschooling.

TruthForge
2 hours ago
*Munich

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
he’s possibly their most important propagandist

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@MaxZet
but if our peple set up the school we would do the hiring btw I think they do something similar in muslim schools

TruthForge
2 hours ago
I’ve never even heard of the movie “Munic”. I guess I should go watch marks review.

ToffeeL10
2 hours ago
Spielberg is a nasty piece of work

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@MaxZet
you would have to have all the teachers on your side it would have to be our people

TruthForge
2 hours ago

@MaxZet
It’s just insane that this response must be feared for simply being “pro-White”.

@MaxZet
2 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
That’s a way to do it. A risk i see with that is that your child might say something that you taught them that is pro-white to the wrong teacher or employee at the school that could lead to CPS or similar government bodies being involved.

@WhiteLightKnight
2 hours ago
Is it time to take over the Conservatives? Just a thought. They are a bit lost presently

@Kickchef
2 hours ago
I think that is putting energy into an opposing group and wasting it tbh

TruthForge
2 hours ago
Revolutionary tactics do not have to be attributed to Trotsky. He and the marxists invented very little, if anything, that had not been used before all over the world.

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
Young talented and energetic people

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
AGREED

@Bres
2 hours ago
“Entryism”. Famously worked for Militant Tendency in Liverpool for a time. It’s about time the right used, or even tried, Trotsky tactics. It’s a good idea to get involved with reform, as Mark said. You can, like militant, sound out our guys

TruthForge
2 hours ago
Knowing your enemy was how I ended up here with y’all. I learned a lot of communism to get here.

NATFLIX
2 hours ago
Entryism doesn’t work unless you change the leader and in Reform’s case that isn’t happening.

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago
SO TRUE

ThinRedLine
2 hours ago

@MaxZet
you could also use some of the leftwing book to discussthem and proove them wrong that might actually be a really good way to redpill the children

TruthForge
3 hours ago
Mark makes good and deep points from a learned and positive perspective. I’m not British myself, but I would follow his lead if I was.

Teutonic Truth
3 hours ago
Truth to powerful malicious Cowards

@cheflad
3 hours ago
whos funding Reform though ,its just a few former Tories who could pull the plug at any given time.

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@MaxZet
maybe you could run a two book system some books you present to the government (you might read some of them ) and some books you actually read

danzimmons
3 hours ago
modern computer animated cartoons are subversive as f^ck

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
when I was hearing about joining Reform and restraining your views
, I started thinking about that Steven French guy. “My fascist views
were rattling the cage man, rattling the cage”

TruthForge
3 hours ago

@Yagoda
Well, I hope he doesn’t read that… Lulz.

TruthForge
3 hours ago
In the USA, they require a couple to Public school if they adopt. Those kinds of restrictions are to force state indoctrination towards replacement (diversity).

Teutonic Truth
3 hours ago
Musk is a malicious Coward for not amplifying PatrioticAlternative.org. uk

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago
Reform had a stall set up in Liverpool city centre last year. I spoke to the chap n he went all weird n shy when i mentioned immigration

danzimmons
3 hours ago
280 on Odysee alone

TruthForge
3 hours ago
Even though we are much larger, with way more population, I think British politics is more complicated than America’s.

@MaxZet
3 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
Perhaps. You would really need to stay on top of what your children are taught. The state issues a national corriculum that every school needs to adhere to. Some ideological stuff can’t be avoided because of it.

Europe Is Ours
3 hours ago
He has a news agency pretty much dedicated to him

The Pork Report
3 hours ago

@NatFlix
Exactly.

@RoryHerbert
3 hours ago
$5.00
Dear Mark, could you ask Woodlander how he defines a ‘fascist chicken’ ? Do they lay eggs with 1930’s European symbols on them or does he have an alternative explanation? :grinning:

TruthForge
3 hours ago
That’s true. The training is worth it alone.

NATFLIX
3 hours ago
Reform will train you how to campaign and be useful.

TruthForge
3 hours ago
SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO many times.

@Kickchef
3 hours ago
People have tried this multiple times with the GOP in Amerikwa

TruthForge
3 hours ago
“woke social and economical woke totalitarianism” escaping the white west then? That’s the only place that I know with wokeness.

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
Nah, do do that. And record it and put it on the internet! :joy:

@MilosM
3 hours ago
2
My opinion on this is…I don’t approve foreigners coming here because they have been backstabbed and betrayed by their own government but I understand them.A man in search of ideal woman, a couple moving over to escape woke social and economical woke totalitarianism, but that is not problem solving

@UKPhoenix
3 hours ago
Thought he was about to say “whip out your” something else then. Had me nervous there marky

NATFLIX
3 hours ago
When I was a UKIP branch chairman that was the situation, a few motivated activists carry the whole branch.

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@MaxZet
ok I see but if you do it an area with little to no diversity you might do more or less as you want

Rufus Page
3 hours ago
Bet they drank the tea river dry

TruthForge
3 hours ago
Parallel schools is primary IMO. They are pumping out Ghey SJW marxists here in our “public” schools.

@Trevor
3 hours ago
You joined the Tory party?

@Trevor
3 hours ago
Jesus… a Tory

NATFLIX
3 hours ago
A typical local Reform branch has 50 members, 6 turn up to meetings and 3 stand.

@WhiteLightKnight
3 hours ago

@jez9999
It could definitely work. It’s one of the ways antiwhites have gained power.

@MaxZet
3 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
We have “school duty” here instead of “study duty” unlike most other white nations. There are private schools but the best you can do is a stricter, more orderly, christian school. It’s about as conservative as it gets.

danzimmons
3 hours ago
yeah there’s no using the system to beat the system

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago
Michael Gove is based in private. He’s just a regime enjoying coward who tows the line

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@MaxZet
homeschooling is illegal ? what about a private free school ?

@noreplacement
3 hours ago
A benefit of being retired is that you can say what you want, to whoever you want. Mind, I no laonger have much in the way of family, or friends, but who cares about that!

TruthForge
3 hours ago
Once the enemy has taken ground, you cannot use the same exact tactics to retake said ground. They will scorched Earth all behind them just to legitimize their hold. It must be a completely parallel and new system IMO.

@UKPhoenix
3 hours ago
That’s one of the most positive points I’ve heard in a little while

danzimmons
3 hours ago
farrage the mirage lol

@BritishGammon
3 hours ago
It’s good to know the grass roots at Reform are just like us

@MaxZet
3 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
There are quite cheap homes and land in the north of Sweden, yes. A big issue being pro-white and wanting to have a family is that homeschooling is effectivly illegal here.

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@MilosM.
true but this might be the way to white pill them

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
true

NATFLIX
3 hours ago
In a PR system small far right parties will vote as a block, as the far right do in the EU.

TruthForge
3 hours ago

@Trevor
“845 billion was given to the hedge funds” This is what you are actually fighting. UNENDING money. You can’t beat that, unless you separate entirely from their system, including THEIR money.

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
If you can’t beat them, join them?

TruthForge
3 hours ago

@CosmicPepe
I live in NM, once they increase to a certain number, they force taxes. In just my short lifetime, NM has gone from majority white to minority white and things dun changed. NM = Now Mexico.

The Pork Report
3 hours ago
o/

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@CosmicPepe
so true

@Trevor
3 hours ago
in the form of QE

@Trevor
3 hours ago
845 billion was given to the hedge funds

@WhiteLightKnight
3 hours ago

@Sonofaclown
Always do and buy GTs for all my relatives

@noreplacement
3 hours ago
The road tax change is being talked about

jez9999
3 hours ago
$5.00
If what the majority of the membership thought mattered, the conservatives would’ve massively cut immigration. Joining Reform and trying to say anything Farage considers unacceptable is a complete waste of time, you’ll be kicked out immediately.

Rufus Page
3 hours ago
sounds aewsome lol

TruthForge
3 hours ago
Black box taxation, now that’s not Orwellian.

@Deanfranjek
3 hours ago
when will it be time Mr Collett?

@cheflad
3 hours ago
Gove has more faces than a Rubiks cube.

jez9999
3 hours ago
5
If what the majority of the membership thought mattered, the conservatives would’ve massively cut immigration. Joining Reform and trying to say anything Farage considers unacceptable is a complete waste of time, you’ll be kicked out immediately.

@Deanfranjek
3 hours ago
when will it be to

TruthForge
3 hours ago

@danzimmons
Exactly. Not once it’s occupied. They would rather destroy it all, then go backwards.

The Pork Report
3 hours ago
Don’t assume that Starmer will quit on his own. He relishes all of the suffering he’s caused. He’s a weak, cruel coward.

@MilosM.
3 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
problem is many young guys I noticed are very black-pilled.

NATFLIX
3 hours ago
Nationalists should throw our weight behind Farage as we did for the EU referendum to break the two party system. After that we will not be dependent on civnat parties.

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@DieKrähen
the same could be done in the AFD

TruthForge
3 hours ago

@DieKrähen
Their “Long March” worked.

@BMC1488
3 hours ago
o/

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
young talented british guys and girls please consider Mark’s plan

BOILING-FROG
3 hours ago
hello!

@DieKrähen
3 hours ago
Infiltration and subversion. it’s a long game and the marxists have decades on us.

TruthForge
3 hours ago
I’ve said forever, if you really want to create a competing system, the number one priority must be a competing financial commodity. I like beads and shells, worth more than paper promises.

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
good plan

NATFLIX
3 hours ago
There are easier ways of taking over a council than populating the entire village. The BNP ran Stoke and Barking councils.

The Pork Report
3 hours ago
Plus, in the USA at least, if those White people all homeschool, there won’t be enrollment to justify a public school, so mexicans will stay away (they use our public schools as free daycare).

Mark Collett
3 hours ago

@PenelopeMaynard7
thank you, you must let me take you for dinner to say thank you.

TruthForge
3 hours ago
Above Time Coffee”.

@PenelopeMaynard7
3 hours ago

@RoryHerbert
my pleasure. thank you :heart_with_ribbon:

TruthForge
3 hours ago
What’s this ”

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@TruthForge
it is and thank you

TruthForge
3 hours ago
I support Patriotic Weekly. Is that a Pro White Business? Got my PA calendar hanging feet away and drink Towler Tea every day. Parallel.

@Carlota
3 hours ago

@PenelopeMaynard7
:folded_hands:

Carney Corner
3 hours ago
Buy Grandma Towlers and Above Time Coffee Etc

Carney Corner
3 hours ago
WE SHOULD SUPPORT Pro white businesses

@MilosM.
3 hours ago

@AlbionForever
what if your bird is okay with the current state UK is rn?

@PenelopeMaynard7
3 hours ago

@Carlota
Thanks to His grace and mercy we are together through the ether. You’ve made my day.
“For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst…” Matthew
18:20

TruthForge
3 hours ago
Foreigners are NOT allowed to actually buy and pass down land in many nations. The least diverse ones.

@MilosM.
3 hours ago

@Carlota
true, they shouldn’t.

Carney Corner
3 hours ago
EQUITY = TAX LIABILITY

NATFLIX
3 hours ago
Imagine if Farage didn’t stand. He would spend the next four years shouting from the stands instead of playing on the field.

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@Carlota
I agree

TruthForge
3 hours ago
Well, that is a new one to me. “Fakeugees.” I think Lauryn Hill started with them.

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
Sweden is quite cheap in the forested areas

@MilosM.
3 hours ago

@TruthForge
I wasn’t talking about fakeugees.

TruthForge
3 hours ago
I hear good things about Martha’s Vineyard. I believe it’s Mexican Cartel owned now. No crime.

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago

@MilosM.
unless you are on an above-average income, or non white and able to run some kind of immigration scam, it’s very difficult these days.

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
Sweden

@MilosM.
3 hours ago
What about Martha’s Vineyard?

TruthForge
3 hours ago

@MilosM.
They are coming because they are ordered to. This is invasion, not organic grassroots.

@MilosM.
3 hours ago

@AlbionForever
no purpose of bringing her to UK, mate?

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
Look into buying property in North east England or southern Scotland, it’s very cheap up there.

TruthForge
3 hours ago
I hear good tings about the Ozarks.

TruthForge
3 hours ago
How can one build a wall of solitude within these legal systems that prioritize diversity above all else?

@TobyRadley
3 hours ago
the Ozarks work for me

TruthForge
3 hours ago
But the billionaire jews target areas like that with diversity. At least that is what happens here in the U.S.

@RoryHerbert
3 hours ago
Evening

@ToffeeL10
Sir.

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
That’s the group run by that Aarvoll guy, right?

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago

@RoryHerbert
good evening my poshest friend, gtsy Ror

@WhiteLightKnight
3 hours ago
No! We cannot leave. This is ours and we need to fight for it.

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@PenelopeMaynard7
More than welcome, we are lucky to have your support

Way of the World
3 hours ago

@TruthForge
:thumbs_up:

@RoryHerbert
3 hours ago
Good evening

@BillAtheling
my friend.

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
or non white

NATFLIX
3 hours ago
Only power matters. We have to fight and replace the politicians and the first battle is Proportional Representation.

@PenelopeMaynard7
3 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
it’s an honor to help. thanks for your kind words. P.

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
Bringing a spouse to the UK is basically impossible now unless you are minted.

TruthForge
3 hours ago
I see this age we are entering into being a “Political” age, and nations wont be the purpose of their service. Boundary crossing interests, such as white existence, will be a the heart of the coming political movements.

@BillAtheling
3 hours ago

@RoryHerbert
evening Rory!

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
I would only leave if I ended up marrying a bird from another European country.

@RoryHerbert
3 hours ago
Dear

@PenelopeMaynard7
Thank you so much for your very generous contribution.

@MilosM.
3 hours ago

@Carlota
hehehe nobody wants Tommy/

Mark Collett
3 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
hahahaha thank you!

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@PenelopeMaynard7
you are so generous Penelope thank you

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago
Because Mark doesn’t usually swear, its weirdly satisfying when he calls someone a dickhead

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@Carlota
very wise

@PenelopeMaynard7
3 hours ago
$200.00
Dear Mark and Woodlander, A salient stream. No truer words. Many thanks for your wisdom. Best, Penelope N.B. Mark, Shall I email you at mark@thefallofwesternman.com? Thanks.

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
He used his Irish passport to get into Canada because he has criminal convictions on his British passport. That’s why he got nicked over there, they discovered his record.

@Bres
3 hours ago
“The Anglo-Celtic council of Great Britain”. It would be just about the most potent way of raising people’s nationalist consciousness, whilst promoting and defending their interests.

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
Tommy’s living in the EU off an Irish passport

TruthForge
3 hours ago

@wayoftheworld
I remember you and Iconclast back in the days that YT hadn’t yeeted everyone. Hope he is well.

@RoryHerbert
3 hours ago
Please support The Woodlander Initiative at
https://woodlanderinitiative.co.uk/

@Lulu
3 hours ago
in my area they are priotising migrants with council or homes

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
$5.00
In my opinion the one does not exclude the other, Why not do both build communities and seek political power at the same time

@Kickchef
3 hours ago
The place with the minority White population would probably be good recruiting grounds, but not the place to set up

@BillAtheling
3 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
hello mate, btw thank you for your work the other night as mod on the stream with Joe, I forgot to thank you

@Lulu
3 hours ago
sign me up xD

TruthForge
3 hours ago

@wayoftheworld
You were instrumental to my waking up. I am glad to see you still going and hitting it hard on X. Thank you.

DerCherusker
3 hours ago
$5.00
Good episode, good guest.

TruthForge
3 hours ago
If white people weren’t prohibited from organizing by law, using an increasingly foreign policing force, then all this forced diversity crap (replacement) would immediately end.

Way of the World
3 hours ago
Good to see alternative solutions being proposed

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago
i cannot wait to start building stuff on the land

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
I’d take living on the Woodlander’s plot over rotting in a big city waiting for Midget Maus to come and save me.

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago

@AlbionForever

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
yeah, that’s why we have the politics we have hahaha

@soundmoney
3 hours ago
hail woodie

TruthForge
3 hours ago
Wrong person.

@WhiteLightKnight
3 hours ago
What is Yorkshire or Lincolnshire like?

TruthForge
3 hours ago
Woops, wrong post, wrong place, sorry.

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago

@AlbionForever
im usually good at noticing things

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago

@TruthForge
can’t see who’s posts?

TruthForge
3 hours ago

@AlbionForever
– I cannot see their posts. I guess I’m the dick head?

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago

@BillAtheling
my favourite wool gtsy laa

The Pork Report
3 hours ago
Well said,

@Woodlader.4

NATFLIX
3 hours ago
In other words colonise our own country.

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago

@ToffeeL10
mate, I’ve had it for about 3 months now :joy:

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
That’s extremely generous and kind of Woodlander wow

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago

@AlbionForever
just noticed your profile picture. You legend

@BillAtheling
3 hours ago
inspiring chat gentlemen

Anti Mattoid
3 hours ago
$26.00
Donation.

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
Society must get honest about it before it gets worse

@WhiteLightKnight
3 hours ago

@BloodyPirateSmith
Thanks I will look there.

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
Nah, he’s just dancing on the strings of his fruitcake bird

TruthForge
3 hours ago
We need to be very clear and use language that they can understand.

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
To live in peace in multiracial society is a ridiculous impossible dream

TruthForge
3 hours ago
Head

TruthForge
3 hours ago
Dick

Teutonic Truth
3 hours ago

@chuck
… Thank God for Mark Collett and all Loyalists

@BloodyPirateSmith
3 hours ago

@WhiteLightKnight
….Herefordshire…..

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago
Liverpool is still over 75% white

@WhiteLightKnight
3 hours ago
I will move there

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
the more we try to include them the more they lash out. Time to cut bait

@Jewy-Von-Swindelstein
3 hours ago
We need to start behaving like Jews

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago
lets buy a swimming pool. They hate swimming

@WhiteLightKnight
3 hours ago
Which county in England is the best to establish White strongholds?

@BloodyPirateSmith
3 hours ago

@BloodyPirateSmith
3 hours ago
….98%….

TruthForge
3 hours ago
I’d live there. Or very close at least.

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago

@Yagoda
It’s powerful truth that only a very select few know about

NATFLIX
3 hours ago
The state sends a diplomat to speak to their ‘community’ tribal leader.

@BloodyPirateSmith
3 hours ago
….we need to buy a farm next….

NATFLIX
3 hours ago
Community is a euphemism for colony

TruthForge
3 hours ago
$11.00
I support your efforts. Thank you for the content and the truth.

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
*Stanley Levison

Oldgods
3 hours ago
Is there an estimate of like minded people to call on towards a set donation for a specific cause,does that make sense

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
We have them beat on both sides of the coin

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
Not only are we better Right Wingers but we are also better leftist in terms of equality, understanding and morals. Basically…they suck

NATFLIX
3 hours ago
I was at Rotherham, saw one placard, it was 99% locals.

John Frazer
3 hours ago
donate? moneys tight. most of us cant pay our bills.

@BritishGammon
3 hours ago
I think the regime would rather set the dogs on White folks rather than speak to a White community leader.

Teutonic Truth
3 hours ago
Trump Blaire Rogan Farage and Cucker Tarlson are malicious Cowards since they don’t promote PatrioticAlternative.org. uk

Lukie..!
3 hours ago
Yep!

@MilosM.
3 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
they must not win.

@MilosM.
3 hours ago
6

@TheThinRedLine
i am also ethnonat. So much that I prefer ethnicity over race but I wont strictly adhere to it if necessary.

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
Do bear in mind that the US civil rights movement was heavily astroturfed with jewish money. Staney Levison was MLK’s speechwriter.

Teutonic Truth
3 hours ago

@chuck
… Not even close.

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
*vacuum

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago

@Yagoda
I read a book by a Jewish guy on it and it wasn’t nearly as bad as its portrayed now

ViceVersaVice
3 hours ago
I appreciate this show. i like to have an accurate look into UK current events. I listened to Richie Allen for a while. Eventually it became clear he really is a baldy gammon.

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
Nature abhors a vaccum

@AlbionForever
3 hours ago
Evening

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
If we focused on our interest only it would be amazing. We don’t need the 3rd world its them who need us

Teutonic Truth
3 hours ago
Six millions is the best estimate

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago
my good mate from The Wirral stood as a candidate for the BNP. The Liverpool Echo did a vile hit piece on him because of it

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago
They can’t even have a consistent definition

AngryGoyJ
4 hours ago
far right – white people

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
$14.00
I think the system is making a mistake with these tyrannical laws , it will only make more people wake up

@Lulu
4 hours ago
iv seen asians are shouting we will kill you death to whites in front of the police and they dont do anything….

@dsallen7
4 hours ago
$15.00
The UK gov’t took a break from locking up their own citizens for standing in the wrong place, to arrest journalist Richard Medhurst under “terrorism” charges for being critical of Israel. Two sides of the same coin.

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@MilosM.
lol

@MilosM.
4 hours ago

@MarkCollett
going out Red Bull style.

@ItWasMadeUp
4 hours ago
lmao

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
tyrannical system

AngryGoyJ
4 hours ago
it gives you wings

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
In a true and fair debate we would kick their ass and they know it therefore they go to these lengths

My Portal 2 chambers
3 hours ago
PA is that group, and any other group that might be created for White advocacy will be regarded the same as they regard PA.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 hours ago
It’s actually the regime themselves that de-facto legitimize violence and hate but against the so-called ‘far-right’.

ToffeeL10
3 hours ago
Farage is useless to us

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
Don’t see us pushing laws to shut them up. Especially not having a punch a whoever movement

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@Jewy-Von-Swindelstein
hmm sounds familiar

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago

@MilosM.
maybe so , they might not win though

@Jewy-Von-Swindelstein
3 hours ago
I am a social nationalist

ThinRedLine
3 hours ago
I am an ethno Nationalist

@MilosM.
3 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
my gut what you have atm is telling me that your government is doing this on purpose in the attempt to rile you up further and humiliate, doing even more and more if you go and cower in the corner. As if they want civil war to happen so they can rid of you.

Chuck Gerety
3 hours ago
These nonsensical definitions are just power plays so they can shut down any opposing views

@Jewy-Von-Swindelstein
4 hours ago
Just own the insult

𝙉𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏 𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 𝙍𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙀𝙒
4 hours ago
$14.00
that is 100% what they are doing. They are criminalizing the dissent of the British people with nebulous terms. It’s horrifying to watch from America. The international overlords ultimately want the same for us too. Evil occupations.

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago

@BritishGammon
Nailed it

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
Blood and soil

@BritishGammon
4 hours ago
Nazi = anyone who disagrees with the regime

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago
Hypocrisy is what they do

Teutonic Truth
4 hours ago
They want calling Liars Liars to be outlawed.

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago
It’s subjective and a matter of personal opinion

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@AngryGoyJ
true

Mark Collett
4 hours ago
If I die from choking on this Red Bull, understand, it’s how I wanted to go out!

@BloodyPirateSmith
4 hours ago

@RoryHerbert

@RoryHerbert
4 hours ago
Please support The Woodlander Initiative at
https://woodlanderinitiative.co.uk/
if you would like to be part of a community that own their own land.

@Lulu
4 hours ago
hi mark and woodlander

Teutonic Truth
4 hours ago
CommonSense Nationalism will Prevail Going free w/ CommonSense..

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago
Obviously that’s tyranny

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
things are heating up

@BloodyPirateSmith
4 hours ago
….ahoy gents….

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago

@MilosM.
Hey there Mate

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago
We live in damn interesting times

@MilosM.
4 hours ago

@TheThinRedLine
hey m8

@MilosM.
4 hours ago
Yes, woody!

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
Woodie the man

@Homa_Tawk
4 hours ago
Simon!

AngryGoyJ
4 hours ago
Yea, and what are we going to do about it. the Internet is dead for white men

@Glen19
4 hours ago
$3.00
Japanese media is largely not available in English but they use Western immigrants as examples on the media of the slowly changing . Just like this article.
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2024/0412/japan-immigrants-local-government

@BritishGammon
4 hours ago
Can I say “White Lives Matter”? Oops, too late.

@Glen19
4 hours ago
$1.00
When I was assigned to work in India by my employer. There were White South Africans in the gated community that I lived in that played professional sports on Indian teams. Gori(term for loose White women) dancers for the film industry there and others

@Bluenose
4 hours ago
Is Wood late? Mark’s BP rising!

Teutonic Truth
4 hours ago
Our enemies are so Evil, they belong Under the gaol.

@BritishGammon
4 hours ago
#TwoTierPolicing

@Jewy-Von-Swindelstein
4 hours ago
oy vey!

@MilosM.
4 hours ago
The way UK is going I don’t wish it, but it’s gonna be civil conflict I am sure. People are getting riled up over their heads for every totalitarian policy that befalls upon them.

@Homa_Tawk
4 hours ago
F R E N S

Teutonic Truth
4 hours ago
PatrioticAlternative.org. uk

5PY_HUN73R
4 hours ago
Hell yes Woodlander o///

@Glen19
4 hours ago
$1.00
Many falsely believe it is impossible to take up residency & employment in foreign countries because there is a global conspiracy against White people. As someone who worked & lived in different countries in Asia I can say this is very false.

ToffeeL10
4 hours ago
Our land, Our future, Our freedom. The Woodlander Initiative, join us folks.

The Resident Baker
4 hours ago
Good evening all

Parken
4 hours ago
Good evening.

Vettekid1488
4 hours ago
he should be shunned

ThinRedLine
4 hours ago
Hello Folks

@SerenaJB
4 hours ago
Good evening.

Vettekid1488
4 hours ago
yeah, does this man still earn his living by Putting ink on White women??? that’s hypocritical..he admitted that the majority of his clients are female

Chuck Gerety
4 hours ago
USA will break apart into ethnostates in 50 years

@Glen19
4 hours ago
$2.00
I don’t think waiting for a race war to break out after demographics become worse will ever happen. Many will do what persecuted populations in the past have done & emigrate. If nothing changes in the West. There will be mass emigration of those that can even to “third world” .

@MilosM.
4 hours ago
good evening all.

@Glen19
4 hours ago
$2.00
Sad to say Mr. Collett. I don’t think anything political was gained from the riots but it appears they will copy what happened in with Jan 6th people. Arrest & jail all of those involved wether actively or passively. What do you think?

@BillAtheling
4 hours ago
Evening folks

Stan1
4 hours ago
Evening

Inspire Eterna
4 hours ago
hi all

Chief Moody
4 hours ago
Evening troops

@Ihtultu
4 hours ago
Good evening everyone.

@WhiteLightKnight
4 hours ago
Good evening everyone.

@JohnSkywalker
4 hours ago
$3.00
… “do what must be done”. This can be seen in the final shot of the Twin Towers and the text “9 of 11 terrorists were killed”. Selling Gentiles on their methods is also done in their book “Rise and Kill Them First”. I recommend reading it if you havent done so already. Really gives you their mindset

@JohnSkywalker
4 hours ago
$3.00
Watched your film review of Munich. As for why the lead character by Eric Bana questions his actions; i think Spielberg made him sympathetic to appeal to Gentiles in the audience and any hesitation they may have fighting the war on terror. Ultimately, i think pro Zionist Spielberg was say to …

Merry_Englander
7 hours ago
$5.00
Donation.

@SteveOfWessex
13 hours ago
Follow the Woodlader here
Telegram:
https://t.me/the_woodlander
YouTube:
https://youtube.com/channel/UCrqA1R8K-LFk9zFUuGDOpfQ

@BMC1488
1 day ago
Definitely looking forward to this one o/

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and welcome to Patriotic Weekly Review, episode number 273. And we are here tonight live on Odysee, DLive, Rumble and Entropy.

 

And if you can do me that small favour, if you can hit the like button, if you can share the stream. Remember, guys, I’m the most de-platformed man in the whole of Britain, the most de-banked man in the whole of Britain. Maybe the most debunked man in the world! Who knows?

 

But the fact is, finding my streams is hard, because they don’t want you to find them. Because I’m one of the few people who will be speaking the truth! Speaking the truth about what’s happened in Stockport [Southport], about the response to what happened in Stockport [Southport], about the Left-wing nonsense that this guy who did this is “British”, just as British as fish and chips and Yorkshire pudding! We’ll be talking about all that tonight and much, much more.

 

Now, if you like these streams, if you support me, if you support the work I do, please consider giving a small donation. You can donate via Odysee or Entropy. All donations are very gratefully received, and they’ll all be read out in the second half of the show. That’s right. Myself and big Jo Marsh will be answering your questions in the second hour of tonight’s stream.

 

So that will be something to look forward to. And obviously, any financial gift will be read out. And if it’s got a question, or a comment attached, we will answer or comment on that statement. Now remember, nothing I’ve ever done has been charged for. I’ve never taken a penny by putting anything behind a paywall. I don’t take a wage from Patriotic Alternative. Everything that I receive is thanks to the good, generous people who support these shows.

 

So please consider something small. And I say this every week. There are thousands and thousands of people that watch my shows each week. And if everyone just gave three or $5, you know, this would be a very, very well funded movement. So please consider a small donation.

 

Now, there is a video out that I actually did for Joe Marsh about the town of Llantwit Major* that’s been very popular. If you haven’t seen it, check it out after the show. I will be doing a video about the Muslim cleric who wants to buy a Scottish island. That will be up on Friday. I’ll be live with Dr David Duke on Friday night. And myself, Natty in Patriarch, will be live for the Nationalist A-Team on Sunday at 07:00 pm. So there’s a lot to look forward to, a lot happening, and a lot of work that I’ve done that’s recently gone up that I think is a very high quality and deserves your support.

 

[* Llantwit Major (Welsh: Llanilltud Fawr) is a town and community in Wales on the Bristol Channel coast. It is one of four towns in the Vale of Glamorgan, with the third largest population (13, 366 in 2001) after Barry and Penarth, and ahead of Cowbridge.]

 

Now, obviously, tonight’s show is going to centre around what happened in Southport.

 

But before we get on to that, let’s introduce the man himself, Big Joe Marsh, a man who was born in Cardiff. He’s just as British as the attacker! [chuckling] That’s obviously sarcasm. Joe is a tireless, tireless worker for this movement. I don’t know anyone who’s dedicated as much of their life to fighting for this cause. I don’t know anyone who travels as far, who goes to the lengths that this man does to attend every demo, to attend every event, and he always brings with him his unique brand, humour and positive can-do attitude. I’m proud to call this guy a friend. Over the last few years, he’s become like family to me.

 

And I’ll tell you this, we couldn’t do what we do without him. Joe, how are you doing, my friend? What have you been up to? And is there anything you’d like to say before we kick off the stream tonight with, obviously, the big issue of the day, which is Southport.

 

Joe Marsh: I’m okay. Well, not really. I’ve been working today, as usual, in the blazing heat in the valleys. But I got loads of things to say about Southport. You said Stockport a few times. Loads of people are doing that.

 

Mark Collett: Oh, God! I’ve heard people say Southend, Stockport, and I’ve seen some people say it was actually in Wales, which is not! So if I’ve said that, … You notice, guys, my camera’s not on and I’ve got a bit of a sore throat. I’m slightly under the weather. If I get anything wrong. My apologies. I meant Southport, not Stockport. Apologies for that. What a great start!

 

Joe Marsh: Yes, I will let you off!

 

Mark Collett: So, mate, Southport.

 

Joe Marsh: Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: It would be ridiculous for us to say:

 

“We didn’t see this coming.”

 

Because let’s kick this off with the elephant in the room. How many of these attacks are we seeing on a daily, weekly, basis? I mean, it doesn’t seem like a day goes by where somebody doesn’t send me a video of what the media calls “youths”, either, cycling around, running down the street, attacking people, jumping out of cars, and all these youths have got machetes or giant knives in their hands.

 

And this knife crime, let’s be honest, it’s being driven by “youths of African descent”, isn’t it? This is young people, of African descent. They are doing this. And we’ve seen this before, haven’t we saw in Nottingham, where three unfortunate people were stabbed to death by a man who was conveniently of “diminished responsibility”. This guy couldn’t possibly stand trial. He’s going to be quietly shuffled off to spend the rest of his life, or a portion of his life, in a mental health institution. He’ll be released with a new identity. And here we are again with an even more ghoulish attack, this time on young girls. Girls are my daughter’s age. This is a personal thing for me. Girls are my daughter’s age.

 

And the first thing is that strikes me is not only could you have seen this coming a mile off, but this is another case, conveniently, he’s 17 years of age, he can’t be named. The papers won’t put his pictures in the paper. You know, they’re not going to tell us who this guy is. There’s a big hunt online. Who is he? What does he look like? You know, there’s pictures floating around that I’ve seen that I haven’t posted because I can’t verify.

 

But here’s the big thing. Isn’t it amazing how they’ve always got some excuse to not tell you who it is, or to ensure that these people don’t stand trial in a proper court?

 

[06:39]

 

Joe Marsh: Yeah, I don’t believe he’s 17. I think they’ve just come up with that as an excuse not to name him. And there’s quite a few names flying around the Internet. And you got to be careful posting that stuff because if one of them is his real name, you could get nicked! You could get nicked for contempt of court, or something. So I don’t post any names on that because there’s people have been posting the picture of that Syrian guy that stabbed those kids up in France in Annecy. And they were all saying:

 

“This is the Southport attacker!”

 

And I’m looking at, I’m thinking:

 

“How could you be so stupid? You know do you not know that that’s a guy in a park?”

 

And obviously we keep up on these events. So I knew straight away where it was from the photo. But I had it sent to me on WhatsA.

 

20 odd times and I was having to say:

 

“Oh, God, that’s the Syrian guy in France!”

 

And it’s just people just blindly sharing things all the time, but, like, these kind of stabbings happened everywhere. In Dublin, not so long ago, they stabbed a load of kids didn’t they? And they’ve covered that up, right?

 

Because if you remember, they’ve never named the child. They stabbed three kids right outside the nursery, exactly the same as this sort of thing. And they’ve never named the kids and they reckoned one of those girls had died, but they’re not saying that. And that there was a riot there and all, just like what happened in Southport, the people have rioted.

 

But the thing is, see, is when these attacks happen, and it’s happened in Germany, in Vienna, loads of places, right? Every time it happens, the governments don’t say:

 

“Oh, we’re really sorry that this has happened, and we’re going to increase security around schools.”

 

What they actually do is say:

 

“We’re going to increase security around mosques.”

 

They have never, ever said:

 

“We’ll put security on schools.”

 

Have they? When these things happen. Like this morning, I read that the government’s going to give 117 million for security on mosques. What about security on schools and events like that? Do, you know what I mean?

 

Mark Collett: Of course. The overwhelming thing is here you’ve got a migrant who’s murdered three little girls. And these little girls, I saw their pictures, I saw the way they were dressed in those dresses, the outfits, just like my daughter dresses. She loves wearing sort of big costume dresses. She likes dressing as Elsa, she likes dressing as Rapunzel. You know, the bigger and more elaborate the dress is. She loved to go to a dance class. If I said to her:

 

“Look, Sophia, we’re off to a dance class this morning. You’re going to be able to dance your heart out to all to the theme of Frozen and other songs.”

 

She would be over the moon!

 

And to think that this guy stabbed little girls as an event like this. And this just comes on the heels. I forgot about this one. This comes hot on the heels of that other black guy who went and stabbed a British soldier. Was that last week? That was last week, wasn’t it?

 

Joe Marsh: Last week, yeah.

 

Mark Collett: You know, so it’s a daily occurrence. We see these people out on the street with knives, and now a weekly occurrence where people are getting stabbed by them. And the government response, the knee jerk response from the government is:

 

“We need to spend more money protecting the people that are stabbing White Britons!”

 

You know, they’re not putting anyone outside schools, they’re not going to have people, they’re not going to have police patrolling outside play areas or parks. Absolutely nothing!

 

I should imagine that since this stabbing, the police have put even more resources into monitoring people like myself, people like you, people in the chat. They will be monitoring us now. And I wouldn’t be surprised if there wasn’t a whole team of police listening to this stream now, noting down everything we’re saying to bring it up in some way to flip the narrative that we’re the bad guys.

 

Joe Marsh: Yeah, well, of course. Well, like what happens after there’s an attack, there’s always arrests of people who got pissed [drunk], probably got angry and posted a load of shit on the Internet. Now at the day after that attack happened in Southport the police would have pulled a load of civilian staff, probably, of other duties, and said:

 

“You’re all monitoring the Internet for threats.”

 

And that’s what they will have done. Just sat there all day looking for people saying:

 

“We need to attack with this and we need to attack that!”

 

But that’s their main interest. You know, if they’re not interested in protecting us, they’re only interested in arresting the people who get angry about these things. And it’s easy pickings. It’s easier than put real police works if you go out on the street and try and tackle gangs, and that, one, you get accused of being racist, which they don’t want, and two, you’ve actually got to work! But they can just go into work, bag of donuts and a cup of coffee and sit monitoring Facebook and looking through Twitter. You know, it’s easy to.

 

[12:22]

 

 

Mark Collett: I’ll tell you this, I did a video on this, and this is for the chat and everyone there. I don’t know which video it is because I haven’t been back and had a look. But a few years ago, I actually did a video on this very topic.

 

Now, it was Teresa May that put an end to “Stop and Search” in London. And the reason she put an end to Stop and Search in London is because they were stopping and searching groups of people at random, regardless of their race, their ethnicity, it didn’t matter. But the people being found with knives during these Stop and Search events were nearly always black.

 

So the results showed that stop and search massively, disproportionately ended up arresting black youths.

 

Now, this wasn’t because the police were choosing to only stop black youth, it was just when they did stop people, a black youth was far more likely to carry a knife than a White youth, or a youth from, say, a Chinese, or a Japanese student. And because of this, Theresa May put an end to Stop and Search.

 

So a lot of these knife attacks that are going on in London could probably be prevented, but it’s actually a government policy to allow these knife attacks to occur because the government would rather knife attacks occur than arrest people for carrying knives. Because when they do arrest people for carrying knives and they publish the results, which they have to, because it’s a statistic. And police in this country still record statistics by race, they found out straight away that it’s all blacks! Blacks get the blame. It’s blacks getting arrested for it. They can’t have that.

 

So the answer is let them stab people! That tell you everything you need to know about the British government. The British government would rather have knife attacks going on a daily basis than prevent the knife attacks and have black youths under the spotlight for being the perpetrators.

 

Joe Marsh: Yeah, of course. And there’s an army of Lefties and black activists and BLM people waiting to scream about it when they do stop them. But the irony is, if they did stop them carrying knives, they’d be saving black people’s lives, because they’re out killing each other every day. And it’s like every time something happens, if people say:

 

“Muslims, it’s Muslims! It’s Muslims!”

 

A lot of these people are not Muslims. They are the descendants of the Windrush generation. They’re just Africans, West Indians, a lot of them. There are Muslims running around with knives as well. But certain people only want you to put the blame onto Muslims.

 

Mark Collett: Would you want to talk a bit about that, Joe? Because I noticed this. I saw a lot of people who were associated with Tommy Robinson, who were immediately saying, this was a Muslim.

 

Now, it wasn’t a Muslim. And the Harehills riots the other week, that wasn’t predominantly Muslim either. There was clearly Muslims involved, but it was Roma gypsies that were doing a lot of the carnage there. And wherever you look across the board, Tommy wants to always pin this on Islam.

 

Now, I’m not saying Islam is a good thing for Britain. I’m not saying we should import Muslims. I’m not saying that we can live alongside those people peacefully, because obviously the grooming scandal, anti-White racist attacks, we know all that. But this is more than just a Muslim problem. This is a across the board migrant problem. And the last few big stabbings we’ve seen here in the UK, the Nottingham stabbing, the stabbing outside the barracks last week, this horrific stabbing of three girls this week, it’s all blacks! And these are the same blacks that make people like Tommy Robinson and his followers very uncomfortable. Because it doesn’t fit their narrative.

 

It fits our narrative, because we’re saying these people shouldn’t be in our country, that they’re a threat to us. A lot of these black people come from very, very low IQ countries. They have low impulse control. That’s why they get off with diminished responsibility, because they don’t have an IQ high enough to be tried in a British court. So why are they even living in Britain if they can’t be tried under a British court? Because they haven’t got the mental acuity to understand what they’re doing. And I did notice last night, Pastor Ricky Doolan turned up in Southport and he was basically shouted out of there for being one of these guys that blames it all on Islam. And he’s not talking about the wider problem of migrants.

 

And a lot of these migrants. Yep. Some of them are coming from the Indian subcontinent, but a huge number of them are Rwandan. This guy was Rwandan, Somalian, Nigerian. They’re coming from sub-Saharan Africa, and no one’s talking about this problem other than us.

 

Joe Marsh: That’s right. Yeah. Well, this is a thing that. Ricky Doolin’s just a freak! I thought he was gone after Laura mopped the deck with him before, you know. And his argument was that the British people will never, like, we will never go out of existence because everyone that lives here is British. And he tried that thing on Laura:

 

“Oh, two African kids who they lived here all their lives and they’ve never known any other country. They’ve never been to Africa. Are they British?”

 

No, they’re not British! They’re Africans. That’s what she said to him. And that’s right. And he wasn’t having none of it. But he’s married to an African woman, he is. Or he was before. And I think he’s only in it for money. You know, he set up that thing, what it called British Lives Matter or something, and he was trying to do it as a grift. He’s been involved in a few scams along the way, like, you know. But, yeah. He didn’t like it when those guys called him out in Southport last night, did he?

 

Mark Collett: He didn’t. He didn’t! And these people have got to wake up to what’s going on here, because I don’t want to be replaced by anyone. I don’t want to be replaced by blacks. I don’t want to be replaced by Muslims. I don’t want to be replaced by Japanese or Chinese. I don’t replace anyone. You know, somebody said to me all migration is now going to be Swedish. Swedish migration would be preferable to African migration, but I still wouldn’t want Britain to be overwhelmed with Swedes!

 

But the fact is, it’s not being overwhelmed with Swedes. It’s being overwhelmed with people primarily from India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Zimbabwe. They’re the four. And China, they’re the five biggest countries of origin for migrants who are coming here.

 

[19:10]

 

And then obviously, you’ve got these boatloads coming over, and they’re mainly from the Middle East and Africa. And when they get here, they act in a very aggressive manner. But this guy was apparently born here.

 

And this is the other thing that really sticks in my craw. These Leftists pretending that this guy’s as British as me and you, because he was born in Cardiff.

 

Now, his parents came here from Rwanda. He was born on British soil to two Rwandan parents. But the Left are, you know, almost acting as if you:

 

“Oh, well, what is the problem Cardiff lads? Is the problem the Welsh? This is a Welsh problem, surely?”

 

I mean, how nauseating is it? How nauseating is it to see things like that, Joe?

 

Joe Marsh: Yeah, well, the reporting is inconsistent anyway. Because some of them have said he moved to Cardiff as a six year old. And others have said he was born in Cardiff. No, that’s why I put born in Cardiff on my tagline here, right?

 

Because if you look at it on Twitter, born in Cardiff, it’s full of Lefties! And foreigners, saying:

 

“He was born in Cardiff. He’s just as Welsh as you!”

 

And it’s sickening! That is absolute, … You know, he’s blatantly an African! Now, I don’t know whether he’s a Muslim or not, because Muslims in Rwanda have a very small minority. He could just be somebody that’s full of hate that’s been pumped into him through the BLM people! Because that’s what’s going on in our schools is White kids are being told they’re the scum of the earth, and black kids are being told they’re victims! No wonder they walking around with a chip on the shoulder, hating on us, because they’re getting it from the Lefty teachers. So it could be just that.

 

But like years ago, I see this Al Qaeda manual, online. And it was in there saying that they need to attack children, because if they attack children, obviously it’s going to cause the most emotional response, and they want retaliation. They want White people then to be so evil about their children dying that they start attacking the Muslim community.

 

And then that obviously brings all the others into the fight. You know what I mean? They’re sort of trying to escalate things. They’re not just killing people for the sake of it, they want a reaction. They want a violent reaction. Because they want to bring all the Muslims, all the peaceful Muslims, into the fight with them. And this is why you can see it all around the world. Like, it’s Germany, France, they’ve stabbed children. They did it in Dublin. And not just Muslims, but like that one who, that little girl who had her throat cut up in Bolton. That was an Eastern European who should have been thrown out of this country about three times, arrived here in the back of a lorry and it’s just like, everyone’s evil about this now in Southport.

 

But, what normally happens is in two weeks time, they’ll all go back to sleep! And it’s like Manchester bombing happened, that Emily Jones got murdered, Lee Rigby got beheaded in the street, you know, everyone’s fuming, everyone’s marching, and then they all go back to sleep two weeks later! And I think, this time, we can’t let people go back to sleep, because the government never say:

 

“Oh, what happened in Southport was terrible! We’re going to make sure it doesn’t happen again!”

 

There’s just nothing! There’s nothing from them! So all it is they’ll call anyone that kicks off about it, “far-Right”. They’ll clamp down on people. They’ll get one step further to more censorship on the Internet as well, because they’ll say:

 

“Oh, they were saying they were rioting last night based on misinformation.”

 

What misinformation was that then? What, did three kids not get murdered? You know, that’s not misinformation. It was true information, wasn’t it? You know, so every time. But there’s never a guarantee, there’s never a:

 

“We’ll make sure this doesn’t happen again!”

 

It’s just like:

 

“Shut up! Go back to your lives, go back to work and, just wait for the next one.”

 

And the next one could be your kids, or my kids, you know what I mean? It’s just like, we can’t just sit back now and wait for the next thing to happen. They need to start deporting people sand they need to close the borders now! You know, nothing else is going to work.

 

[24:01]

 

 

I listen a proper idiots, like, on live streams saying:

 

“You know, what would you like to happen then? Oh, I’d like them to be re-educated when they come here. And I’d like to, …”

 

Like, Tommy even said once he wanted the Quran to be rewritten, to take the hate out of it. As if that’s gonna work! Like the only thing that’s going to work is to remove millions of people from this country. Like, we’ve never voted on immigration. No one’s ever asked us if we want them here, we don’t want them here. And I don’t care what colour they are or where they’re from, right? We used to have some Polish lads that used to come to demos with us and they were good as gold and that. But I don’t want millions of Polish people coming here, taking everything from us.

 

And it’s like, I see in all these valley towns, as well as all the Africans and Arabs that are appearing everywhere, there’s big groups of Eastern European people who look just like us.

 

But then when you walk past them in a supermarket and they’re speaking foreign languages. I don’t want to be flooded with anyone, regardless of where they’re from! They’re taking up all the houses. It’s like, one of the boys down here, his father was ill last week. He waited 34 hours for an ambulance! And when you go to Cardiff Royal Infirmary to the A&E, it’s just full of foreigners in there. It’s chock a block with foreigners all trying to get a sick note! This is unbelievable! Like the only thing that’s going to sort this out is to close the borders right now, and then start deporting people.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I couldn’t agree more.

 

I was going to go on to the solutions to this, and there is only one solution. It’s to reverse the demographic trends. That we need to go back to being a high trust, high IQ society where we live peacefully in a largely homogenous group. And that can only be achieved by stopping people coming in and starting to re-migrate, those who shouldn’t be here.

 

Now, I’m not saying everyone has to be forced out at bayonet point or anything, but there does have to be a reversal of the trends that we’ve seen.

 

And I think people, obviously, we’ll go on to the response that took place in Southport in a minute, but we’ve seen people very angry about this. As we’re speaking now there is a huge demonstration outside Downing Street. Keir Starmer has been heckled. Other MP’s, I’m sure, have been heckled about this. We’ve seen people like Yvette Cooper fan the flames because she spoke very softly and eloquently when talking about the rioters in Harehills. But when talking about what happened in Southport last night, well, she wasn’t as polite and softly spoken. There was no talk of speaking to community leaders and community action. There was just her basically frothing at the mouth about how angry she was that anything like this could even happen and how people needed to be in serious trouble for what they’ve done.

 

And I think there’s going to be a huge amount of pressure now on the Labour government. And my gut feeling is the Labour government’s response, especially as they’ve got such a large majority, is fundamentally to double down on non-White migration. They will double down on multiculturalism. And I think their response will be to attack all those who are rightfully upset about this.

 

I think with the Tories, I don’t think the Tories would have done anything, but the Tories would at least paid lip service to the problem. They’d have at least sort of admitted that there was a problem and that they would look into things.

 

Obviously, we know nothing would be done. But I think labour are going to come down hard and I think their response will likely be to limit the rights of protest of indigenous people who are sick of this. What are your thoughts?

 

Joe Marsh: Yeah. Oh, definitely!

 

It’s the same thing every time.

 

I mean, this is exactly what’s happening in Ireland. They’ve had thousands of people on the streets and they’ve just been ignored. And, it’s the same as us. We’ve been marching and demonstrating for years, peacefully. Right? You know, the only time there’s any trouble is when Lefties attack our marches or demos.

 

But obviously peaceful protesting is not working! Because they just totally ignore us! Or they don’t ignore us, they they call us names, they call us “far-Right”, and they talk about banning us and they de-platform us and they take your bank account off you, and all this sort of thing.

 

So when you take the right to peacefully protest and actually achieve something, away from people, what have they got left? They’ve only got violence left! That’s what’s happening in Ireland now. It’s going violent. And they’re not thinking:

 

“Shit! We’ve gone too far with this. We’re flooding all these people in and putting them in front of the indigenous people!”

 

They don’t think:

 

“We’ve made a mistake here!”

 

They just double down on it and say:

 

“You’re scum! You’re far-Right!”

 

And they talk about crackdowns and locking people up and all this sort of thing. See, it’s just like, this is going to get worse and worse now. I think you’re going to see more trouble!

 

But I’m not sure that they’ll care! I don’t think they’re going to just think:

 

“Shit, we’ve gone too far!”

 

I think they’re just going to double down. You know, they’re just letting a load of criminals out of prison because they’re saying there’s no room in the prisons, but they’ll find room for people who were rioting last night, I’m sure.

 

[30:26]

 

Mark Collett: I agree. And let’s talk a little bit about what happened last night.

 

Now, the first thing I noticed this morning was the Daily Mail were very, very quick to call last night’s incident a “riot”.

 

Now, that’s very, very interesting, isn’t it? Because the Daily Mail is always very, very careful to call BLM protesters, you know, Palestinian protesters, Muslim protesters, whoever they’re always, no matter what they’re doing, they’re always “protesters”. But these guys were immediately “rioters”! And these “rioters”, in inverted commas, have been attacked by the media.

 

But there’s a couple of things to say about this. I think the first thing we’ve got to say about this is what happens when you’ve got a government, a police force and a media that repeatedly ignore the will of the people.

 

Now, I put out a statement today and I might as well read it. I said:

 

“Last night’s disturbances in Southport were caused by the system, the government, the police and the media. The government have imported murderous and violent migrants by the boatload against the wishes of the public. The police have allowed migrants and their descendants to commit horrendous crimes against White Britons and then assisted in covering them up, instead spending resources harassing Whites who dare to speak the truth! The media have lied and lied! They have used their powers to smear and defame anyone or any group that has rallied against the colonisation of our small island home.”

 

And my summation is that this is what happens when White people are routinely ignored. They’re living under an anti-White, multicultural tyranny! They’ve been dispossessed of any power. Effectively, we’ve been turned into Second Class citizens. And the blame for last night’s behaviour, and it wasn’t the perfect response. I’m not here saying these guys should have done what they did. I’m not here saying that I want to see people respond in this kind of way, because I don’t. And we’ll talk about the perfect response in a minute.

 

But the issue is, I think this is pent up frustration that has built up for years or even decades.

 

And what you’ve also got to remember is, at first this was peaceful until what appears to be a man who looks like he’s from the Indian subcontinent, he looks like he could be Pakistani, turned up at what was at the time a peaceful protest with a knife.

 

And one of the reasons White people in Southport were drawn into violent action last night was because they were there to protest against the brutal slaying of three little White girls by a migrant. And what are they met with? They’re met with riot police and then they’re met with another migrant wielding a knife! Well, are the media going to point that out?

 

Of course not!

 

Now, can you imagine if BLM were out protesting and a group of nationalists turned up? They would be nicked immediately. Immediately, the police and the media would have a response that would be Beamed out everywhere. Any trouble would be blamed on those nationalists.

 

But in this case, yet again, you can see White Britons being pushed to the absolute limit by people who have already done the unthinkable, who earlier, you know, earlier, did the unthinkable by slaying three children! Why would somebody turn up with a knife? You know, what’s going to happen to this man? Why isn’t his name everywhere? Why aren’t the media reporting this? Well, they’re not, because, again, the media would rather we didn’t know the truth, so things just went back to normal and White people could quietly go into the night.

 

Joe Marsh: Well, we’ve had, back in the EDL days, we had people turning up Muslims. I think in Leicester, there were some Indians turned up with knives. Right? Got arrested. And they let them go! Because they said that they felt threatened. So they picked up a knife, because they didn’t want to walk the streets with us around. And the charges were dropped on them.

 

Another time in Rotherham, there was, I think it was a Britain First demo and some lads I know from Yorkshire were in the pub surrounded by Muslims attacking. I think they called them the “Rotherham Ten”, which was the Muslims that was arrested. They had bread knives and they were trying to stab some of the lads in the beer garden and the lads had to pick up stools and had to defend themselves. All the charges were dropped on the Muslim youth, and the our lads had the average of two years each for defending themselves. And they basically said they picked up knives.

 

And here’s another interesting bit. This case is one of the lads, one of our lads had pleaded guilty and he wanted to change his plea back to not guilty. So he went in front of the judge and the judge told him he couldn’t. He said:

 

“Once you’ve pleaded guilty, you cannot change it back.”

 

Because you basically admitted it and now you want to say that you didn’t do it. So they wouldn’t let this White lad change his plea.

 

Now, the ten Muslim lads had all pleaded guilty. They were allowed to change their plea back to not guilty.

 

And then the prosecution offered no evidence. And that used to be on the Internet. I looked for it and I can’t find it. They were called the Rotherham Ten, but I think it’s been taken down.

 

[36:29]

 

 

But there was also a bit in there where the local police chief had said that when he’d arrived at the scene, he decided to arrest 10% of the nationalist protesters because he knew what their intentions were, in going to that area. Which is just ridiculous! So he arrested 10% of them for nothing! And this is what we’re up against, this a blatantly anti-White two tier system. And they’re not even trying to hide it. They just don’t care about us. It’s just like any other community can riot.

 

They were rioting in South End last night, or the other night, and fighting with knives. And Kier Starmer has not mentioned that, has he? Not at all, like because he doesn’t want to upset them. But if that was White lads, they would be promising them that they go into jail. It’s like Tommy goes on about the two tier system all the time. It couldn’t be more obvious, could it?

 

And it’s like the way they police that Harehills, running away like that.

 

And then in Southport, they’re there with their riot gear on. And they’re smacking people with batons and everything. It’s a totally different game when it’s White people.

 

Mark Collett: And it’s just been revealed about 3 hours ago that the first big response to this stabbing is Humza Youssef, the former first minister of Scotland has called for the EDL [English Defence League] to be prescribed.

 

So the response to three White girls being stabbed [killed] by a migrant is not:

 

“Well, maybe we need to vet migrants. Maybe there should be some kind, kind of stop and search laws come back in. Maybe we need to review people before they come into this country and they’re granted citizenship.”

 

But, oh, no! The first legal response that has been suggested to this butchering, because that’s what it was. I mean, this to go for defenseless children, is this the most sickening, the lowest thing you can do!

 

But the first suggested legal response is to proscribe the EDL now as a “terror group”. Well, the EDL aren’t a terror group! What absolute nonsense! And Angela Rayner*, she’s been very careful with her wording, but she’s paid lip service to this. So it’s actually worse than what we were saying earlier. The response from Labour is to actually begin potentially looking at, quote, unquote, “Right-wing groups” that they can ban in the wake of this. So rather than getting rid of the fox, which is slaughtering the hens in the henhouse, the government’s response is to silence the farmer that’s raising the alarm. That’s the kind of world we live in. I mean, is the EDL even a functioning group anymore, Joe?

 

[* Angela Rayner (née Bowen; born 28 March 1980) is a British politician who has served as Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government since July 2024. She has been Deputy Leader of the Labour Party since 2020 and Member of Parliament (MP) for Ashton-under-Lyne since 2015. Ideologically she identifies as a socialist and as being part of Labour’s soft Left.]

 

Joe Marsh: No! There’s been no EDL for years. It’s like, I think it’s about ten years ago, the last time they ever had that. I think one of their last marches they ever did was in Telford. And we went up there like just for the day out. And there was about 15 of us sitting on these tables outside this pub. And they came down the road and there was about 80 of them. And they, after that, I think they just knocked it on the head. So I’ve not heard anything about the EDL for years.

 

So this is how clued up they are. And surely they’ve got advisors and they’ve got police advising them. And like, even Merseyside police were saying they wanted to ban the EDL. What I read earlier. Well, what EDL are they talking about?

 

And anyway, even if there was an EDL, this is nothing to do with Right-wing groups. This is just local people and scousers who don’t want their children to be murdered!

 

How do they think people are going to react when, like Starmer and that Home Secretary, they went there to lay some flowers. They didn’t even speak to the crowd! They just laid the flowers, got their photo done and shot off! You know, people were heckling them. They could have turned around and said:

 

“Look, we’re really sorry about what’s happened, and we’re gonna do something about it!”

 

But they couldn’t give a shit! They’ve just got the photo shot and gone! They’re not gonna do anything! They’re not even gonna pretend they want to do anything to help the White community. They don’t care! It’s just, they want us to shut up and just roll on to the next time someone that doesn’t deserve to be in this country decides to murder a load of our children. Whether it’s at a concert with a bomb, or just wants to walk into a school and start stabbing people. We’re just supposed to wait for that to happen, you know?

 

Mark Collett: And the crazy thing with Keir Starmer turning up, he didn’t even look like he was bothered, did he? I mean, it literally was just a photo-op. And off he went. There was no care. There was no actual love. There was no sort of, he didn’t look upset by it. If anything he had that look on his face of complete indifference.

 

The kind of look where when you’re a child and your parents force you to go to carpet warehouse for the weekend and you don’t really want to go, but you have to behave yourself, because if you don’t there’s going to be some sort of there’ll be some fallout afterwards and you’ll have some of your privileges taken away. And that is literally the look on his face of a man who didn’t want to be there. Felt it was some kind of inconvenience for him. He clearly didn’t care. He didn’t say any words.

 

And I’m just waiting now for the official response. By the official response, what I mean is that sickening response where a special event is called to basically ensure that everything’s back on track. You know the type. There’ll be some kind.

 

Joe Marsh: Don’t look back in anger event.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, exactly!

 

[43:18]

 

Joe Marsh: Yeah. Well, it’s like that barrister on Twitter who says that the police had contacted him because he was posting stuff. And they said:

 

“They’re trying to manage the coverage of this.”

 

You know, they’re “managing it”.

 

This is why I think they’ve made up the fact that he’s 17. They would sat there thinking:

 

“Shit, we gonna have to name this guy and they’re gonna know he’s a migrant and they’re gonna kick off. So we need get out of jail card!”

 

So I think they’ve made up the fact that he’s 17, because they’re so desperate. They will have had a high level meeting and, like, what they call them, “Cobra Meetings” or something. There’s no possible way that they can tell the public that that guy has just stepped off a boat, you know, even if he had, because they know it’ll kick off!

 

So they’ve come up with this “born in Cardiff” story. Because, like I said, some of the papers have said:

 

“Oh, he moved to Cardiff from Rwanda.”

 

Like, why are people coming here from Rwanda anyway, right?

 

Anyway, but some of them said he come here when he was six, and some said he was born in Cardiff. No, if he’s born in Cardiff, this is the sort of shite they came out with in Dublin. They said:

 

“Oh, yeah, he’s Algerian, but he’s been here for 20 years.”

 

Well, if these people are, like, second generation immigrants, that’s even worse! Because it means they’ve lived here all their lives and they’re still acting the same way they do when they’re back home.

 

So whatever they come up with is just nonsense!

 

And if you remember, in the Dublin attack, right, they said:

 

“Oh, this migrant had tackled him.”

 

Can you remember this? Right, some foreigner., …

 

Mark Collett: Yeah.

 

Joe Marsh: He’s a DLiveroo driver. Like, there’s millions of DLiveroo drivers in there. Anyway, this delivery driver tackled him, and then all these dummies set up a gofundme for this DLiveroo driver. And the narrative is:

 

“Okay, the guy that did it is a migrant, but he’s not just come off the boat migrant. He’s been here for years, so he’s just as Irish as you and me. And the good news is this good migrant tackled him!”

 

And it turned out that was nonsense! Because some White guy had tackled him and got stabbed a few times.

 

And the other fella, like this, like, Spanish or whatever, he was. Had just helped a little bit. But they put him in as the main guy because it’s a “good migrant story” isn’t it.

 

And like, if you notice on Twitter there’s a story which seems a little bit, like, not real to me. There’s some black fella there, weightlifting and they’re saying:

 

“Oh, this is the fellow who tackled the knife man.”

 

And all that. Well, okay, if that’s the case, why hasn’t he been on the news then? You know, telling people what happened? They’re going for the same sort of thing:

 

“A good black man tackled him, otherwise there would have been a lot more casualties!”

 

I just think it’s more bullshit! It’s trying to offset the bad migrant with a good migrant, who saved the day, like, you know.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, I’ve seen that. I’m obviously sceptical of that because of I read the reports and apparently people were fleeing out of the building. I’ve not heard he was actually tackled by anyone.

 

Joe Marsh: No. Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: So I don’t know about that.

 

One thing I will say though, now, obviously we don’t endorse any violence. People actually messaged me and said:

 

“Mark, are you going to be calling for people to go to Southport? Are you going to be saying, everyone get there this evening?”

 

I didn’t call for that. Patriotic Alternative, didn’t call for that. I spoke to a few people behind the scenes and I did say to people:

 

“What are people’s plans?”

 

I spoke to another high profile guy in the movement and he said:

 

“I’m absolutely not going to say that because it could well kick off and whoever’s there is going to get the blame, basically.”

 

And you can see the blame game being played now.

 

Now, obviously, I understand what happened, happened. And I understand people are angry. And I’ve already said I blame the government, the media and the police for what took place in the Southport last night. But really there is a better way. And we need people to direct their anger in a legitimate political manner.

 

Now, we recently had a couple of these big Tommy Robinson demos in London and they’ve been well attended. You know, we’re talking sort of about 5,000 people each time. You know, good numbers. You know, I’m not knocking it. He still gets a good turnout. But I’ll tell you this, I’ll tell you this, and it’s Joe actually mentioned this to me, so I’m going to throw this over to him a minute. But if, if, and this is a huge if, you’ve got 5,000, if you’ve got 5,000 people, okay, that’s a lot of people. Divide that 5,000 by 100. That’s 50.

 

Now, imagine if you had 100 teams of 50, or 50 teams of 100. You know, is there that many cities or towns? I mean, imagine being able to say 50 people were out in a hundred different towns on a single Saturday, each with banners, with leaflets with a little stall to get people involved. In my opinion, that would be a much greater and a much better use of people’s time than standing in Trafalgar Square watching some documentary, having a migrant up on stage, then having black gospel singers, then Ricky Doolan coming out and reminding people that multiculturalism is apparently brilliant! You know, I would like to see genuine action.

 

[49:26]

 

 

Now when we started PA, one of the things that we wanted to do was days of action like that, where you had different groups out doing political activity every weekend, and we still pretty much do that you know. There’s different groups out doing social, political or community based work each weekend all around the country.

 

But Tommy Robinson has obviously got a much, much bigger draw than PA. You know, he’s a much bigger name. The media build him up. But I kind of feel that whenever he responds to something, whenever he gets people together, it always just seems to be for a big ego boost for those up on the stage, so that everyone has a good day out and can walk away feeling they’ve done something good.

 

And my message to the people of Southport is, you’ve got every right to be angry, you’ve got every right to be furious! But there is a better way than kicking off and fighting with police. I understand why it came to that, but there’s a better way. And that way is bringing people together, protesting, building an actual resistance. And if Tommy and other people followed this logic, I think there could be impressive weekends of action where every single sort of city and town in the UK, every single major city and town in the UK, had some kind of representation, had a demo in that city and town.

 

And I think that would make a much bigger noise. It would reach far more people than just having these big events in Trafalgar Square. What’s your thoughts, Joe?

 

Joe Marsh: Well, I did a video about it last week, didn’t I, and I said:

 

“It’s all very well turning up in London in numbers.”

 

And I think it’s more than 5,000 people there. They reckon that Trafalgar Square holds 20,000 people. And it was packed out and there was more than that there. So I don’t know. I’ve been on loads of massive matches, like DFLA, like the Brexit ones, the lockdown ones. They reckon there was a million people there. Like, I don’t know. It’s impossible to count. But he gets a massive crowd out.

 

Now, if he was to tell them to split themselves into groups and just demo every city in town on the weekends, well, maybe then we’d start winning, because it would cost the government and the police a fortune. And if we kept the momentum going, and I see people making these noises, like, now, because when I made that video, that Southport stabbing hadn’t happened.

 

And since then I’ve seen people making videos saying:

 

“Everyone needs to do a demo in their city and we need to keep this going on.”

 

Well, hopefully that’s what they do. Because they can get massive numbers of people out and we can’t. And I don’t care who does it, but someone needs to do it. When these politicians are doing things to us that we don’t like and they’re making unpopular decisions all the time, which really badly affect people’s lives, and that, if we don’t complain about it, which we generally, most they don’t know!

 

I think half of these MP’s are so deluded that when they say:

 

“Multiculturalism is amazing!”

 

They actually believe that that is the case! Where the majority of people on the streets, everyone I meet, they’re all just complaining about it and moaning about it! And it’s just like, they need to be told! They need to be told with numbers of people, every time one of these MP’s has a [word unclear], there should be 50 people turning up to tell them that they want action done to protect our people and protect our children.

 

And we can’t let people just go back to sleep on this one. Like they did with Emily Jones, like they did with the Manchester bombing, like all the other terror attacks that have happened. That’s why the DFLA sort of burst out of nowhere and then it was a wet fart, and it was gone a few months. But it was because there was terror attack after terror attack after terror attack! Like London Bridge. Everyone was fuming and all of a sudden you’re looking around and everyone’s gone again! Do, you know what I mean? We can’t let it happen again. We really can’t!

 

And I hope I’m right. And people are going to keep going on this one. Because they need to know we want action, because we’re not just going to wait around for more kids to be murdered. No chance! I’m not going to do it. But I’m always active anyway.

 

But I mean, we’ve got our network of activists, but, I mean, I can’t get 20,000 people out on the streets. The people who can need to get them out there.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I’ll say this, Joe, you’ve echoed a lot of what I go through regularly when I’m analyzing these things, when I’m sat in quieter moments, I always get concerned that these things happen. They’re horrific!

 

And for me, I look at these things and think:

 

“Surely this has to be a tippy point. Surely this has to be a situation that leads to lasting change.”

 

And then, unfortunately, you regularly get the opposite of that, don’t you?

 

So people go back to sleep. People just get tired of talking about the issue.

 

I mean, thank God the football isn’t on. Because if England were playing in the Euro finals this Sunday, it would all be forgotten for that, wouldn’t it? That would be it. I don’t think people are really as invested in the Olympics as they are in the footy.

 

So I don’t think that we’re going to be seeing people doubling down on Olympic fever and forgetting about this.

 

[56:13]

 

But I do think that we have a really, really serious problem in this country where people do turn up to the odd demo, they do the odd thing, but then it’s back to sleep!

 

And I think that’s why. I mean, you and I have spoken about this. I’ve spoken about this with Woodlander, I’ve spoken about this with other leading names in the movement. We as nationalists need to do something that creates a lasting change, whether we acquire land, property, we build structures that are going to be generational. Because at the moment people come into the cause, 18 months later, these people disappear and the public are even more fickle.

 

I mean, how can we speak and reach out to the public and convince them that now is the time?

 

Because I’ve got to say this, I’ve had more messages about this particular issue from sort of friends who are slightly political, than I have in a long time about other things. I’ve had people who I’ve not spoken to for years message me and say:

 

“Oh, Mark, you still in the politics, what do you think about Southport?”

 

This has really hit a nerve with the British public. But is there a way to stop people going back to sleep? Or, you know, this time next week, will people be discussing something new?

 

Joe Marsh: Well, that’s what I’m saying is we’ve got to keep going on it and do what we do, like making videos, going on streams. And just try and keep people there.

 

But, I mean, if they go back to sleep, they go back to sleep, don’t they. There’s nothing we can do about it’s happened so many times before! I thought the Manchester bombing was gonna be it, right? I really thought, like, I thought Lee Rigby was gonna be it, but, like, yeah, that was a five minute wonder.

 

But then a load of kids got killed.

 

But then the other one, Emily Jones, that, like, someone’s walked the kid is right through a pack, and some foreigner who shouldn’t be here, and the authorities should have deported her, and they were supposed to. She gets up and just randomly cuts the kids throats! I mean, if that’s not enough for people, what is! People didn’t demand change then! Some of us matched. Some of us did demos and the Lefties came out of the cupboards to attack us. They don’t give a shit about the kids. All they cared about is shutting us up!

 

And you can see that on Twitter. You see what happened with me, because I shared a leaflet, a flyer for the demo last night or the other night in Southport, and some foreigner has done a post about me saying that I’m the person that organised it and I caused the riot. I didn’t even go! All I said was:

 

“Please share Southport demo.”

 

Because people needed to go there. They needed to show the government that they weren’t happy. I wasn’t asking people to go there and smash the place up. I didn’t know what was going to happen.

 

But it’s been shared, like, or viewed 1.4 million times, right? And I’ve had inbox after inbox from commies, and foreigners calling me name. And I’m just blocking them, like, left, right and centre. But this is what it is they’re not concerned about those dead children. They’re only concerned about silencing us! That is literally all they’re worried about. It’s unbelievable! I just in the middle of the Southport carnage, did you see that woman walk up with a Hope Not Hate sign? Did you see her?

 

Mark Collett: No, I didn’t. I’ve watch some of the videos. I’ve seen some of the videos going around. It doesn’t surprise me.

 

Joe Marsh: This crazy Lefty! Yeah. She walked up with this sign saying, Hope Not Hate, and we’re all humans or something, and she just stood there and people were all round and abusing her. And she just stood there. And she’s not concerned about the children! She’s only concerned about the far-Right that she absolutely despises. And they’re not far-Right, they’re just normal people.

 

It’s unbelievable how anyone can defend this multiculturalism that we never asked for, that has flooded us with foreigners that we don’t want here. There’s a housing crisis. I’m not saying they’re all bad, right? But amongst them, thousands of our people have been murdered. Even more, thousands of girls have been raped, right, by people who should never be here. How anyone can defend it? And how many, like, videos of machete fights do you need to watch to realise that this country now is a dangerous hellhole! And the majority of the people are doing it are not indigenous British people!

 

How many videos do you need to watch? And you put those videos on and Lefties just go:

 

“You’re a fascist!”

 

And start screaming about it. Well, I’m not a fascist. I’m just showing you what’s going on.

 

[1:02:00]

 

 

And it’s like there’s on the PA website, there’s a list of British people who’ve been murdered by migrants over years or foreigners, people who shouldn’t have been here in the first place. And there’s loads there, but that’s nothing! Somebody posted a list of a thousand foreign rapists on Twitter. It’s on there. It’s like a montage of a thousand cases where foreign rapists have been through the courts, right? That’s the tip of the iceberg.

 

And we got all these Albanian gangs coming over here. They’re not interested in claiming asylum. If they claim asylum, they get put in a hotel and they go missing because they only come in here to get involved in a drug trade. There is nothing good in this for the British people.

 

And yet it doesn’t matter how many atrocities happen, the government is not saying. They’ve never once said:

 

“We’ll sort something out. We’ll make sure this doesn’t happen again.”

 

All they say is:

 

“Don’t look back in anger, move on! Oh, don’t have hate in your heart!”

 

And all shit like that! They never say:

 

“We’ll make sure it doesn’t happen again.”

 

If I’m wrong, tell me I’m wrong. I’ve never heard them say they’re gonna do anything.

 

Mark Collett: No, mate, you’re absolutely right! You’re absolutely right! We’ll round this half of the show off and go on to the Superchats.

 

But I think the thing that you’ve said that really touched me is every single one of these Lefties or liberals are fundamentally happy for this to happen. They’re happy for White British girls to be murdered to keep the multicultural train going. And at this point, it is like a child sacrifice, isn’t it? You know, people talk about satanic cult, satanism, you know, politicians being part of a satanic clique, but this is child sacrifice! Children are being, White British children are being sacrificed on the altar of multiculturalism and these Lefties are cheering it on. They don’t care how many kids die as long as those borders stay open, as long as we keep bringing them in!

 

And I mean, all we wish for., … And we’re being treated as if we’re terrorists when all we’re asking for is peaceful separation. Because that’s all I want. I don’t want a war on the streets. I don’t want rioting. I don’t want to be fighting people of a different culture, or a different ethnicity. I just want to live around my own. I want my daughter to get on her scooter and be able to play with her friends in the street, or for me to be able to take her to soft play or for us to go out and into the city centre and get an ice cream and go to the park without having to worry, without having to look over my shoulder.

 

But now that’s not the case. There are going to be British parents now looking over their shoulder every time they see one of these people. And the people I’m talking about, the ones that look like they’ve just got off the boat. And it’s not just the skin colour. It’s not just the way they look. It’s not the fact they don’t speak English. They wear the same clothes. They have a look about them. These people are a threat!

 

But we have to live alongside them, and we have to play that Russian roulette every day with our kids lives because people like Yvette Cooper, Keir Starmer and all these liberals, you know, Hope Not Hate, all these different migrant charities, because they are politically wedded to the cult of multiculturalism! And our kids have got to be put on the chopping block for that. And it’s sick!

 

Is there anything you’d like to round this half of the show off with, Joe? Before we do these Superchats?

 

Joe Marsh: I’ll just tell you a little story about what I saw today. One of the Swansea lads, there’s like, a kids event in Swansea, right? So he goes on to their event page and says:

 

“Will there be security there because of what happened in Southport?”

 

Meaning, will you have security in case some nutter walks in and starts stabbing kids?

 

And one of the Lefties replied:

 

“Well, you know, yes, it was terrible what the far-Right did there.”

 

It’s just like, we weren’t talking about the riot or what happened in the night, we’re talking about the stabbings! Like this Lefty thought that he was talking about the far-Right. That’s unbelievable! Do you understand what I mean there?

 

Mark Collett: Yeah I do understand. Even if they had security on the door, … Here’s another question, Joe. If they had security on the door, would they have had the balls to stop a black guy?

 

Joe Marsh: No. Exactly! Well, they didn’t in the Manchester bombing, did they?

 

Mark Collett: No, they let him through because they didn’t want to be accused of being racist for stopping a young Muslim.

 

Joe Marsh: Yeah, that’s right. So all those kids died because of this doctrine that’s been brainwashed into people. The police are scared to do their jobs over it as well. This is why these black gangs in London know they’re not going to get stopped. They can carry knives. You don’t walk around London with a big machete down the back of your trousers if you think you’re going to get stopped. They know they’re not going to! Like Sadiq Khan is even worse! He’s always grizzling about police stopping and searching people.

 

So if you was a copper in London and you see a car full of black youths and you think:

 

“Oh, shall I pull them? It’s not worth my time, because if I pull them, I’m going to get called racist and that.”

 

So they don’t, they just leave them go. So at the same time that we got this massive rise in knife crime, we’ve had the police have their hands tied behind their backs as well. So they can’t protect people.

 

The whole thing is a joke!

 

And like I said, no one is. No one is offering any solutions to the British people. So the only thing that we can now do is to get on the streets in numbers all over this country and just demand action. And not be squabbling amongst the groups. There’s some groups, I won’t name them, that since this has happened, all they’ve done is carry on slagging out other groups! You know, even if you don’t like other people, like other groups, just push in the same direction because we’re trying to protect our children from being murdered!

 

And the only way that we can do it is to force them to have to start at least closing the borders and starting to get rid of some people, some undesirables. You know, that’s the very least we need to be pushing for.

 

Yet some people just can’t help themselves. They spend all their time just talking about other groups and slagging people out. So everyone get on it! Get demonstrating and just start pushing in the same direction. We’ve got to do this, otherwise there’s just going to be another case of this, like Southport.

 

[1:09:32]

 

Mark Collett: I agree, mate.

 

And obviously we’re having a big demo on August 10 outside HMP Hull. That’s at 01:00 pm. That’s for Sam Melia, a man who predicted all this, who should be free. And I will be saying a few words about what happened in Southport. That’s going to be a big demo for Indigenous People’s Day. If you can be there, please do.

 

We’re going to do these generous Superchats now. Thank you. If you’ve had Superchatted already, we will get through them all. It Was Made Up gave $25. Thank you so much, my friend. And he said:

 

“Thanks for all you do, Mark, Joe and PA, keep up the great work!”

 

Well, thank you, my friend.

 

And I hope that PA activists will, you know, keep doing the sterling work they’ve been doing. There’s lots of people to be outreaching, obviously, people can tell I’m a bit under the weather today. I was going to design a new leaflet today. I’m going to get that done by the weekend, but I have been very under the weather. That’s why my camera’s not on.

 

So I hope the stream has been up to, up to scratch! You can hear my voice isn’t particularly good, but we will have a robust response to this, and we do have our demo on the 10 August. Dsallen7 gave $15. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“I wonder if there were agent provocateurs in Southport encouraging the attack on the mosque? This is very convenient for the systems narrative as it allows them to shift focus from the three slain girls. Plus they can pull a gotcha by revealing the Rwandan suspect is actually a Christian.”

 

That’s a good point, but I’m not sure there will have been agent provocateurs. I think what happens in these cases, and it’s very, very disappointing, but I’m sure Joe will agree with me on this.

 

When it comes down to it, Whites don’t actually have community leaders. So every other group has got community leaders. There are Muslim community leaders, black community leaders, Hindu, Sikh community leaders, even tiny little communities. So if you’ve got a small group of people from, like, Hong Kong, there will be a community leader that represents them. But Whites simply do not have community leaders.

 

So when things like this happened, there is no one there to call for calm, to say:

 

“Look, we shouldn’t be doing this. We need to organise politically, we need to make sure that we vote for the Right candidate. We need to make sure we protest in this way. We need to get rid of these MP’s that don’t represent us.”

 

So things bubble over. It’s because our communities have been shattered. What do you think, Joe? Do you think somebody could have been stirring this up, purposely?