Joel Davis: Okay, please tell me that it’s not fucked! Chat, are we cooked? Are we good or?

 

Blair Cottrell: Give us some feedback, guys. How are we coming through? Are we loud and clear? Are we glitchy? Give us some feedback.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, let us know if you good. Are we cooked?

 

Blair Cottrell: Apparently we’re all good, man!

 

Joel Davis: Put a TND in the chat if it sounds good. If I see at least 10 TNDs, then I’ll know that we’re good to go. Okay, I’m seeing the TND’s flying. Okay. I don’t know what happened there. It was like something.

 

Blair Cottrell: What does TND mean? What’s TND?

 

Joel Davis: Oh, don’t even., … Yeah, right.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Totally Nice Day. It’s a totally nice day for The Joel and Blair Show. And we are here to discuss what has been another interesting week in politics.

 

Finally, a story that we can discuss on the show in which we’re not actually personally involved. The Charlie Kirk assassination! There’s a lot of interesting aspects to this, a lot to break down and we’re going to talk about that. It is the 14th of September [2025]. Apologies to the audience for the weird tech issue. It wasn’t my fucking fault though! Streamyard, what are you doing? You know, I pay my Stream Yard subscription and this is it. But I guess, that’s what happens, like sometimes shit just glitches out. It is what it is.

 

But yeah, Blair, I guess there’s a lot of dimensions to this on the Charlie Kirk assassination, and we can get into, I think a bit later, like the theories around the shooter and all the rest of it. But the official story, it is quite blatantly clear what the FBI is saying and what has been released, the media, is that this is an Antifa tranny fucker who has shot Charlie Kirk in a political assassination.

 

And the way that I interpret this, and I think the take home message from this, taking it at face value for the broader public, is this Charlie Kirk, his whole thing was that he was the “debate me bro” conservative. He had like, he was literally shot under his banner above his head said, “Prove me wrong”. Charlie Kirk would go to college campuses around America and he would openly debate anyone and everyone on his views. And he’s a very kind of personable, true, chill, friendly kind of guy. He’s not particularly militant, quite moderate in his views, although lately he’d been saying things that are a little bit more edgy or controversial, but nevertheless pretty moderate by the standards of the conservative movement. Kind of smack bang in the centre of where the conservative movement is at. And he was shot in the neck for it. It doesn’t matter how much you try to present yourself as a upstanding, reasonable conservative in a suit and tie and impress upon your political opposition that you’re not one of those Nazis, you’re not one of those fascists, to the Left we’re all fascists! And they want us all dead!

 

And what this signifies to me, because liberalism is based on this premise of what Schmitt* calls like “discussionism”, this idea that you’re going to have this gentleman’s agreement, which is basically what the Constitution is and what liberal, democratic norms are we going to have freedom of speech, you’re going to have elections. We’re going to have this peaceful and open and amicable debate within society where we’re all part of the same national family, national community, but we’re going to have a good faith debate and discussion and competition in the free, an open marketplace of ideas and through the political process that everyone’s allowed to participate in, apparently to determine which direction the government is going to go and what direction policy is going to go. And that’s kind of how it’s solved, right?

 

[* The Schmittian friend-enemy concept, articulated by Carl Schmitt in his work “The Concept of the Political,” posits that the essence of politics is defined by the distinction between friends and enemies. This framework suggests that political actions and identities are fundamentally shaped by conflicts and antagonisms, emphasising that politics arises when these distinctions become pronounced. Carl Schmitt (1888–1985) was a conservative German legal, constitutional, and political theorist. Schmitt is often considered to be one of the most important critics of liberalism, Parliamentary democracy, and liberal cosmopolitanism. But the value and significance of Schmitt’s work is subject to controversy, mainly due to his intellectual support for and active involvement with National Socialism.]

 

And so it’s built on this gentleman’s agreement between the Left and the Right that they won’t resort to violence, that they won’t break the contract. This gentleman’s agreement has been utterly trashed by the Left. The Left has no respect for it. You know, for decades upon decades, the predominance of political violence has come from the Left, but also they’re trying to the predominance of the attacks upon freedom of speech have come from the Left. They’re trying to put us in jail, literally, for expressing nationalist views here in Australia. They’re doing it in the United States to a lesser extent because the First Amendment.

 

But all across Europe, the Hate Speech laws are even worse than Australia, basically, across Western Europe. The Left have basically taken over media, taken over educational institutions, are trying to propagate their ideology through bureaucratic authoritarian means upon the next generation, criminalise dissent and ultimately kill people for even moderate forms of dissent. They’ve pushed the Overton Window so far-Left that to them, even a moderate conservative is an evil fascist Nazi that deserves to be shot just for existing in public and brutally executed in front of the whole world and his wife and children.

 

And so what this needs to be for the Right is a reality check that this conservative, Right liberal premise that we can somehow debate the Left and sit down and have a gentlemanly exchange of ideas and gentlemanly competition for political power, and that we can ultimately share a political process and a country with organised Leftism. I think it should be a reality check that this is a total delusion. If the Left are going to shoot you and call you a fascist anyway, you might as well become one.

 

[06:25]

 

What is fascism? Fascism is basically more or less seizing control of the state and locking the Left out of the political process, saying:

 

“All right, we’re not going to play this fucking game anymore. If it’s either your dictatorship or ours. If we’re going to have a Left-wing authoritarianism or Right-wing authoritarianism, well, then we’re going to do the authoritarianism. We’re going to be the ones running the state, and we’re going to put all your leadership in jail and we’re going to criminalise your political ideology and we’re just going to just basically take control and assert our vision for the country!”

 

And that’s what the Right needs to come to terms with, is that this illusion of liberal democracy needs to come to an end. And it’s time to pick a side. And they call people like myself, like yourself, extremists. But all we are is ahead of the curve. All we did was just kind of like think through to the logical conclusion, to the realisation that sharing a political process with the Left is ultimately untenable, on a long enough timeline, eventually it’ll become impossible to do so, and then eventually a decision will have to be made. Are we going to have a Left-wing or Right-wing dictatorship? A Left-wing or Right-wing authoritarianism? And we need to choose very firmly Right-wing authoritarianism.

 

And if conservatives keep clinging to these liberal, democratic ideals that are based on faulty premises and ultimately are just capitulation to an assertive authoritarian Left that wants us all dead for opposing them in the political arena, then ultimately conservatism is just a suicide pact! Ultimately conservatism is going out there with a friendly face, trying to shake hands and be amicable with an enemy that’s just going to pull a gun out and shoot you in the face and execute you. So what is conservatism then? Just a suicidal cowardice! It doesn’t make any sense anymore.

 

The fact that Charlie Kirk would be executed like this in front of the whole world should be this reality check. And I think a lot of conservatives have been very radicalised by the experience. Not just seeing the execution, but seeing the reaction of Leftists online, of Left-wing media justifying and even celebrating what transpired and realizing that this isn’t just a difference in ideas. This is actually an existential struggle between two fundamentally incompatible worldviews. And so that’s how I think we should look at it, and that’s how I think we should frame it to conservatives.

 

This isn’t particularly radicalising to people that are already on the far-Right, that are already on our side, because we expect this kind of thing. It doesn’t surprise us. But it has been shocking to conservatives, and it should shock them into realizing that rather than punching Right and complaining about how we’re bad optics and making them look mean. But they need to get me. And they need to start working with us and deploying us. The same organisation that executed Charlie Kirk was the organisation that Tom Sewell is currently in jail for fighting a few weeks ago. It’s the same organisation. These anti-fascists, they don’t care if you’re really fascist or not. They’re coming for everyone. And the only solution to that is to actually get fascist and fight back!

 

So that’s my primary take. But I’ll throw the floor to you, Blair, because I know you have a lot of thoughts and feelings on the matter.

 

Blair Cottrell: It sounds to me, Joel Davis, like you haven’t acknowledged your guilt yet! Don’t you know that White people throughout all of history have trampled the world and created suffering, have enslaved people, have colonised nations! All historical suffering is our fault! And we need to suffer now to pay for all of that. We don’t deserve any rights. We don’t deserve any dignity. White people deserve no freedom. What happened to Charlie Kirk, it’s deserved. We all deserve that because we’re the evil capitalist race, the ruling class. Down with us! Acknowledge your guilt! [chuckling]

 

That’s literally what some people believe, isn’t it? And that’s the ideology which motivated Charlie Kirk’s assassin. I don’t even like to use the term “assassin”. It’s too cool. You know what I mean? Like, he’s just a murderer. He’s a coward, rat murderer!

 

This happened while I was streaming with Mark Collett. I got up early in the morning, started streaming. About halfway through, we heard the news that Charlie Kirk had been shot. And my first question to Mark is:

 

“Who’s Charlie Kirk? I’m just a humble Australian down here.”

 

And when he explained that he’s that guy who sits at university and debates people, I’m like:

 

“I know that guy!”

 

And I discovered that a lot of people I know who aren’t even that political, not only knew Charlie Kirk, knew who he was, but they watched him quite frequently and they were really devastated! They were shocked and sickened by what happened to him. Especially being able to actually watch the shooting over and over again! Clips of him bleeding out from the neck like that. That was absolutely brutal, man! Brutal! What a coward! The person who shot him from a distance. The one guy who was willing to just sit there and open dialogue, you know, And I’m seeing all across the Internet, Leftists trying to justify and celebrate this open murder, this cowardly, pathetic murder of a moderate conservative debater. You know what they’re saying? They’re saying:

 

“He wasn’t even that moderate. He said ‘mean things’ about black people on this occasion, and he said mean things about women on this occasion, and he also said some mean things about transvestites on this other occasion. And so that’s why he was shot! He wasn’t a moderate at all!”

 

So that’s subjective. First of all, that you believe something he said was nasty for some reason. But would that justifies the man getting shot in the neck? Of course it doesn’t. It’s just a disgusting, …

 

[12:32]

 

We’re up. We’re up against a vicious enemy! An enemy that, as I outlined in the beginning of my statement, with a bit of sarcasm, actually believes that White people are to blame for all historical suffering and need to be crushed under heel! Need to be punished in every way thinkable for their for the sins of their ancestors! Not only do these people serve as politicians, judges, police officers, Professors in the universities, but they are teaching the next generation, hoodwinking the minds of young people.

 

I mean, did you see that guy? There was a guy who walked through some American universities after Kirk’s killing and was just asking students what they thought about Kirk’s assassination. And they all thought it was good. They’re all saying:

 

“Yeah, I don’t really care. He was a bad person. He said mean things, didn’t like his opinion. So good, I’m glad!”

 

Basically, is what they were saying. Look, I’m very angry about it in my heart, because I have empathy. I’m not a Leftist psychopath! I can actually put myself in somebody else’s position and imagine what they’re going through, what they’re thinking. And I don’t just dehumanise people as “Nazi fascist racists”. Like, to me, Charlie Kirk was a person. I don’t even know what he stood for necessarily, because I never watched him that much, but I knew that he was willing to debate with people. He was willing to talk it, talk it out. And it just sickens me that we live in a system which brands people as villains and tries to justify their public execution. They’re just cowardly murder for the sake of this White guilt, White people must be punished sort of ideology, because that’s what’s motivating it, as I said.

 

Look, one thought I had on it, which I’ll wrap up my point with, is governments around the world, Western governments, they’ve been both occupied and tricked! They’re tricked into chasing a decoy enemy. They’ve made an enemy out of the far-Right, the extremist threat of the so-called “far-Right”, while far-Left anti-fascists, one of them at least, just shot someone in public, shot him in the neck, executed him because he was far-Right. So the same people the government are chasing are victims of that kind of terrorism.

 

And do you know any anti-fascists, anyone watching this? Do you know any far-Left anti-fascists that are banned from entering certain countries, raided by police on no evidence, taken to court for speech crimes, on government watch lists as potential national security threats? I know plenty of people on the far-Right, the so-called “far-Right”, the class of heinous villain that we apparently belong to. I know plenty of people on our side of politics who fall into all of those categories and suffer those kind of limitations on their existence. Don’t know anyone, don’t know any anti-fascists that experience any of that.

 

So I do believe that through clever language, pressure and subversive ideological tactics, far-Left anti-fascists have hoodwinked western governments, occupied and hoodwinked Leftist governments. So state resources are now spread out and wasted on so-called far-Right extremism, which is not only not a threat to society, it’s the solution to all of society’s problems! Probably why governments have been hoodwinked into chasing it as the primary threat by the people who actually are the primary threat to society.

 

I won’t say anything else about that for now unless something else occurs to me. But thanks for joining us tonight guys. It’s been an absolute hectic week or two with the arrest of Tom Sewell, the August 31st rallies in Australia, everything that transpired after that during and after, and then the Charlie Kirk shooting. God, isn’t it just going crazy? It really, it feels like everything is just spiraling into absolute chaos! The Australian government is actually using both the August 31st rallies and Charlie Kirk’s shooting as justification for pushing through a social media ban. They’re saying it’s just for young people at first. That’s how they’ll get it over the line, right?:

 

“Oh, we’re just trying to protect young people. We don’t want young people to see so-called far-Right extremism and political assassinations. And so we’re going to censor the Internet for that reason.”

 

That’s what they’re saying. So just for people under 16. How are they going to tell who’s under 16 and who’s not? Obviously that’s going to create the framework for them to censor the entire Internet or to do their best to block certain websites or content from being accessed by Australian citizens.

 

So the response of the Australian government to people organically rallying to challenge government immigration policy and to a moderate conservative debater being executed in cowardly, sickening fashion by an anti-fascist activist, the response of the Australian government to that is to create a censorship programme to stop us communicating and seeing stuff like that and talking about it on the Internet! To hide that reality! That the fact that is happening to hide that from the Australian people. Which yeah, is just as sickening as the shooting itself in my opinion. But I have more on this. You chime in first and then I’ll continue with what I’ve got to say next.

 

[18:04]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think it’s interesting. I looked at Charlie Kirk’s Twitter and the last tweets that he made were actually about that, what was in America, but she, I think she was an immigrant from Ukraine that had moved to America recently who was stabbed in the neck by that nigger on the train in the US. And that video went very viral because it was just so shocking that she just like sat down on the train, was on her phone and then a nigger was sitting behind her and just decided:

 

“I’m just going to stab this White bitch in the neck and kill her!”

 

And there was four or five black people that were on the train in the seats surrounding it, that looked at it and then just like looked back like they didn’t care while she like bled out to death in front of them. And the black dude walks off like:

 

“I got the White bitch!”

 

You know, it was like an obvious racial hate crime.

 

And the response of non-Whites was not to acknowledge that there’s a problem with anti-White hatred or anything like that. Their response was to say:

 

“Oh you see, like the Right is just trying to like use this to further its agenda of hating blacks.”

 

And then this happened to Charlie Kirk. And the reason why that anti-fascist shot him was probably because Charlie Kirk has made some moderately pro-White takes. Apparently he was fucking a tranny. He had a tranny, well, really boyfriend, but he probably would have called it his “girlfriend” because he’s mentally ill. A mentally ill faggot!

 

But anyway, some of Charlie Kirk’s rhetoric on transgenderism might have motivated it as well. But obviously the fact that Charlie Kirk has said even very moderate, vague, pro-White things like:

 

“That you should be proud to be White, Whiteness is great!”

 

Or things like that, was enough to be classified as a Nazi and therefore deemed worthy of extermination. Brutal execution by the Left! And this has been celebrated by mainstream politicians, mainstream journalists, pundits on the Left. The prevailing sentiment on the political Left is that anyone who says anything even vaguely pro-White deserves to die. And even anyone who says anything vaguely critical of transgenderism deserves to die apparently.

 

We can’t share a political process with these people. We can’t share a country with these people. The most charitable thing that we could do is seize control of the state, implement some kind of dictatorial regime that is able to purge Leftists from every major institution, universities, media, education in general, bureaucracies, what have you, to identify basically the key perpetrators and funders and so on, and neutralise them. And then basically put all of their followers and supporters in massive re-education camps and through massive re-education programs to basically disinfect their mind from this extremist, insane, genocidal ideology against our race. That’s what has happened. Like millions and millions and millions of Whites have been basically brainwashed into a genocidal ideology against their own race!

 

And also tens of millions of immigrants, non-White immigrants, have been brought into our country have also had this genocidal ideology propagated amongst them, and they feed into it and believe in it as well. This is not something that we can just have a discussion, or a debate about. This is not something that we can just have maybe one election cycle, they win, maybe one election cycle, we win. Something radical and totalizing and final needs to be done!

 

And you might say:

 

“Well, that sounds a bit extreme. And I like liberal democracy because my free speech and all this kind of stuff.”

 

Well, you know what, they’re the people that are trying to destroy free speech. They’ve already given up on liberal democracy. You can’t force them to play fair with us. They’ve decided already they don’t want to play fair.

 

So now we have to play for keeps! We can’t play fair with the Left anymore. Right. Maybe 100 years ago in places like in Australia or whatever, you had a more moderate Left-wing that wasn’t genocidal against our race and it was just disputes over economic policy and things like that. And we could have a liberal democracy and it could be relatively stable. We don’t live in that society anymore! We live in a society now where the entire political ideology wants us dead! So it’s just like it’s no longer a tenable solution.

 

A lot of people talked about how all in the Middle East, maybe it was an unwise decision to take out certain dictators because if you give democracy to these Middle Eastern countries then radical Islamists just end up like taking over the government and creating an even worse situation than what previously existed underneath the strongman dictator that kept that population in line. We said:

 

“Oh, that’s what it’s like in the Middle East. They’re not like Westerners.”

 

And it’s, well, it’s becoming like that in the West now. Things have gotten so bad and our enemies have become so extreme that only a strongman dictator can actually solve this. We don’t have the ability to solve it the nice way. You can keep generating, you know, infinite guys in suits that are well spoken that are going to go and debate topics in public and win debates and convince millions of people that White people shouldn’t hate themselves and we should have common sense, immigration Reform or whatever, it doesn’t matter! Antifa is going to show up and try and beat them up or kill them.

 

The Left-wing institutional bureaucracy is going to try and change as many laws as possible to put these people in jail. The enemy is going to try and get our kids in through the educational institutions and, or into their Discord servers or whatever and then infect them with this extremist genocidal ideology, and then deploy them to start committing acts of terrorism like we saw the other day. That’s what’s happening!

 

[24:58]

 

And I’ve seen the conspiracy theories advanced by some people that actually the Mossad killed Charlie Kirk. And this is just like they’re just blaming it on Antifa as like a front or something. But they killed Charlie Kirk because he started moderating too much on Israel.

 

And Charlie Kirk was an Israel shill. Charlie Kirk’s whole career was funded into existence by Israel, basically like Turning Point USA was basically a front of the Israeli government. That’s why he was able to become so successful and prominent in the first place. And in recent months he has been moderating his position somewhat on Israel and people said that’s why Israel took him out, because “they made him, they’ll break” him kind of thing. And it was like a warning to all other shills for Israel that if they step off, step outside of the bounds of what they deem acceptable, they’re next kind of thing. To kind of have a chilling effect on this kind of tendency. We’re seeing particularly on the American Right, but we’re seeing it here in Australia as well for there to be conservative opposition or Right-wing nationalist opposition to Israel becoming increasingly prominent.

 

But I haven’t seen any evidence to support that when it comes to the actual shooting. Like there’s like circumstantial evidence. Like, that Harrison Smith guy from Infowars, like a month before the shooting tweeted out something like:

 

“Charlie Kirk is afraid that Israel will kill him if he goes against them.”

 

There’s like little bits of circumstantial evidence, but there’s no evidence about the actual shooting itself that I’ve seen.

 

Now I’m an open minded guy. I know that Mossad commits shootings. If evidence ends up coming out. You know, if there was some other, if the official story doesn’t check out, if there’s actually an alternative theory and evidence can be presented, then we can look at that and we can revise our take on the subject.

 

But as of right now, I haven’t seen that. So as of right now I’m just going to take the official story at face value because it is entirely plausible that some fucking Antifa lunatic would do something like this. We’ve seen incredible amounts of political violence from the far-Left. And the far-Left all collectively celebrated it and justified it. So they’re still culpable.

 

So insofar as that’s the official story, let’s hold the far-Left accountable because that’s what the official stories seem to support, until we have reason to believe otherwise. Like we as nationalists, yes, Israel is an enemy of ours. So is Antifa! You know, whenever we try and do a political demonstration, or a political activity, Antifa come down and try and engage in violence against us. They engaged in organised violence against the March for Australia rally a few weeks ago. They’ve firebombed Tim Lutz’s house, one of our friends and associates, the Victorian leader of our organisation. And the list goes on! Antifa, always trying to dox our activists, attack our activists. And they’ve embedded themselves in Australian media all over the place to carry out their designs. So if the official story is Antifa’s responsible, I’m going to hold them responsible because Antifa are fucked! They want me dead! They want Blair dead, they want all of you dead that watch this show and sympathize with what we’re doing.

 

So that’s what I have to say about the Mossad theory. I entertained it when the shooting first happened. Like there’s some, okay, let’s explore it, but I haven’t seen good evidence for it. What I have seen good evidence for is that this guy did it. People said:

 

“Oh, it was a professional hit.”

 

Well, looking at the evidence, it was actually only a 200 yard shot. If it was a professional shot., … It wasn’t even the best shot. Because it hit him in the neck, but it kind of ricocheted off the top of, … It looked like he was wearing some kind of bulletproof vest or body armour of some description. And it seemed like it hit him around the collarbone or just below the collarbone area and then ricocheted up into the neck. Obviously he wasn’t aiming for the neck. He probably didn’t even know that he had a bulletproof vest on and was actually aiming for the chest and got lucky.

 

So I don’t know. I don’t think it was. There’s not really any like compelling evidence that it was a professional hit. There were some weird things that happened on the day, like this random jewish guy claiming that he was the shooter immediately and acting weird and so on. But none of that proves that it was Mossad or it was the CIA or all this kind of stuff that I’m seeing online.

 

So you can be open minded, you can entertain those theories, but just asserting that it’s true without evidence, just kind of, it de-legitimizes you, if you’re a public commentator, if you’re just going around asserting that particular groups did things without evidence.

 

So I’m not going to do that I’m going to go:

 

“Okay, well, if we take the official story at face value, it was an act of far-Left terrorism and far-Left terrorism is out of hand!”

 

It’s not like the first act of far-Left terrorism. And Antifa should be declared a terrorist organisation in every Western country. Anyone who funds or contributes to Antifa’s activities should be forced to immediately cease and desist. All of their assets should be taken, they should be criminally prosecuted. People expressing Antifa sympathies in public should basically be made illegal. This is how they want to treat nationalists who don’t engage in this kind of behaviour! You know, we don’t engage in this kind of behaviour, we don’t support it!

 

[30:37]

 

 

And if Antifa came out or elements of the communist left came out and said:

 

“We don’t support political violence, we disavow this in the strongest possible terms.”

 

Then they would at least be able to remove themselves of moral culpability. But name me one Leftist group that has done this? Not one Leftist group has done this, right? If someone who has far-Right sympathies engaged in an act of political terrorism, far-Right groups would say:

 

“Hey, this guy had nothing to do with us. We don’t support violence, we don’t support terrorism!”

 

Because they wouldn’t want to be seen as being supportive of terrorism because of all the consequences that that would ensue and the loss of public support and so on. On the Left, they basically don’t even have to disavow their own acts of terrorism. That’s how fucked the Left is, and also how weak the government is. In the United States apparently the Right is in power, the so-called “Right”. You’ve got Trump and you know, his administration. What are they focusing on right now? They’re focusing on trying to pass new laws to try and take passports of American citizens who criticise Israel, because the First Amendment exists in America they can’t just make criticising Israel illegal or something. So then they have to use an indirect means of saying:

 

“Well if you criticise Israel, we’re going to cancel your passport. So you can never travel internationally.”

 

To have like a chilling effect on discourse in America around Israel. That’s what their focus is on. Rather than on going after organised political terrorists that directly attacked Charlie Kirk, which supposedly is one of Trump’s top supporters.

 

You know, they had Air Force Two taking his body and it was this big political hoo ha and he’s personally friends with the whole administration. Imagine if there was an act of Right-wing terrorism, their reaction would probably be stronger. This has been pathetic and weak!

 

So the so-called Right is in power. They don’t see this as a political opportunity to go after our enemies because, and this is the fundamental problem with fucking conservatives. All they care about is doing the bidding of Israel, seemingly. But that’s it.

 

Like when it comes to actually fighting the Left and actually fulfilling their mandate, there’s a million and one excuses and you know, it’s a cuck fest. So it’s disappointing.

 

I wouldn’t expect like our Left-wing government down here to list Antifa as a terrorist organisation, but how come no one on the Right is saying it? Why isn’t Pauline Hanson or even like people in the Liberal Party coming out and saying:

 

“Antifa needs to be listed as a terrorist organisation.”

 

That just engaged in organised violence on the streets here in Australia. Two weekends out of the last three weekends in a row, they’re shooting political commentators in the neck and executing them in America. This is a serious problem. Where’s that kind of narrative? No, instead you’ve got like literal Antifa members going on the ABC, justifying the shooting of Charlie Kirk basically, and then also calling for us to be classified as terrorists! And we haven’t actually committed even an iota of political violence other than defending ourselves from them attacking us.

 

So the Right is pathetic! This conservative establishment is fucking pathetic! The politicians in these parties and so on. And the pressure needs to come on! And this is why the people are ultimately going to come more and more to the radical National Socialist movement in this country and they’re going to move to the far-Right more and more around the world, because conservatives are too weak to actually take on the Left. They’re too weak to actually take on their own ostensible enemy. We are the only ones radical enough and clear thinking enough and earnest enough and true enough to say and propose actions that are going to be necessary to convince, confront this threat.

 

And so that to me is how we need to be framing this. That is how we’re going to win people over to our side is by calling this out, calling out the weakness of the conservative response.

 

I saw Trump being interviewed about this like two days after, or a day after:

 

“How are you feeling about the Charlie Kirk thing?”

 

And he just like changed the subject to building a new ballroom in the White House and that he’s feeling great. It’s like he doesn’t give a fuck! It’s like even if he doesn’t give a fuck, like in his heart I don’t really care about that. But why does he not see this as, look at this incredible political opportunity to classify Antifa, a group that is engaged in organised violence in America how many times like the BLM riots Antifa were playing a leading role in that, like burning down the whole country when Trump was president last time. They engaged in organised armed violence against ICE recently in the US over basically trying to stop ICE from deporting Mexicans from America because you know, they’re such anti-White pieces of shit that you can’t even deport illegal immigrants without them trying to like engage in like terrorism against the state. That’s insane!

 

Imagine if like the Right armed up and started like engaging in like terrorism under the Biden administration, like street terrorism and like shooting leading Left-wing, you know, commentators like at like public events and like taking up arms against the government. Would they just be like:

 

“Eh, whatever, it’s sad or it’s a problem.”

 

And just move on with their agenda? No, they would like literally go for the jugular against far-Right groups. So it really is pathetic!

 

But that’s what we’re dealing with. That’s why fascism is necessary! That’s why National Socialism is necessary! This suit and tie conservative, let’s just talk about it, cuck fest, let’s be the bigger person. It doesn’t cut it! It’s not going to fucking work! It’s ultimately it’s just going to lose and lose and lose and lose due to its own inherent weaknesses.

 

 

[36:25]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I sit with my back to the wall. Do you do that? If I’m at a restaurant waiting for a train, chances are some radical Leftist is going to try to stab me, or something worse. They’re very unlikely to confront me directly for obvious reasons. And so chances are I’ll be stabbed in my lifetime by one of these maniacs. So I sit with my back to the wall! Because I understand that communism and anti-fascism, they’re not real debatable opinions, not in the way that we are raised to believe constitutes a real opinion. Like anti-fascism doesn’t debate people, they just try to slander and kill people because they don’t represent an ideology, a real ideology. They only disguise themselves as an ideology to take advantage of liberalism, or a liberal society. But they’re always just hostile subversives. Hostile subversives trying to force themselves into a place of absolute authority.

 

They want to use that authority then to abolish liberalism, crush and enslave you! That’s what they want and they think it’s justified because of the perspective that White people have created suffering in the world and that’s what they deserve. This is plain faced what these people actually fucking are and what they believe! This is it! They’re cruel, petulant, ruthless enemies of our country and our entire civilisation around the world!

 

And they won’t be happy until we’re all gone. We’re all genocided and dead! They think that’s the solution to all the world’s problems because they think all the world’s problems have been caused by White people. They boil it down to something that embarrassingly simplistic, and they think they’re smart for doing that.

 

They want to kill me. They want to kill you. If you’re watching this and you’re even Right leaning, they want to kill you too. And they demonstrated that by just killing Charlie Kirk, the one who was trying to sit down and talk to him.

 

And yeah, they should be listed as a terror organisation right now! I suppose it’s still possible that some moves could be made in that direction once all the facts are known. I know that the FBI is apparently chasing far-Left groups who are associated with the shooter. And it might be possible, not might be possible, might be the case that at least one far-Left group called, I think the “Social Democrats of America” or something, I don’t even know. Democratic Socialists, maybe. They may have had prior knowledge. This guy who shot Charlie Kirk may have discussed his plans with them beforehand. They deactivated one of their social media accounts and many people had been seen coming to and from the shooter’s residence leading up to Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

 

So what else do I say about this man? I mean, the way I think the way I phrase that just then is as simple as it gets. Anti-fascists are the enemies of society. They want to kill White people and they don’t want us to exist in the future. They think everything bad that ever happened in history is our fault and they want to punish us for it. It’s pretty simple.

 

And the majority of them are actually White, which is really creepy! It’s creepy how effective propaganda can turn an entire race of people, or at least a fraction of a race of people against themselves through some sort of guilt complex. It hoodwinks you into thinking that all of human history is as simple as White people being evil and needing to be punished for it. And there are literally people who believe that and make it their day job to harass and execute White people as punishment for this perceived historical injustice. It’s really weird to me. It’s weird to me that they could even watch me say this and they still won’t understand how fucking retarded they are!

 

It’s bizarre that we have human beings, we live amongst human beings that are that simple and retarded! I struggle to wrap my head around the small capacity for thinking and understanding that’s natural to these people. I suppose the reason they exist is dysgenics, is they’re so genetically like retarded! They’re just like not very well bred and not very well raised and they haven’t experienced very good standard of living, or a stereotypical, a standard mother, father relationship as they grew up. And they have all sorts of internal mental problems as a result of that. I don’t know what it is exactly. It’s probably a complex of reasons why they end up believing nonsense!

 

But isn’t it funny, Joel, how they try to obfuscate the simplicity of their worldview by acting like they’re really educated and smart and over intellectualizing all of these weird socialist economic policies and pretending that they’re just against capitalism, pretending that they’re just against corporatism and they’re just against the big businesses and the people who are trying to exploit the worker. Workers of the World Unite! But it’s all fucking bullshit!

 

But it’s all a cover for the simplistic race hate, the anti-White race hate that is always driving them! They over intellectualise garbage and hide their true intentions behind slogans that everyone can get behind. But what they really want is to exterminate White people and punish White people for perceived historical sins. And what else can you say about it? That’s the situation that we’re living with in the world today.

 

 

I’m on a government watch list and banned from all social media. I get my bank accounts closed, I get raided by police on no evidence. I have been taken to court for hate speech, not necessarily because of anything I’ve said or done, but because I’m White and because I’m an effective critic of this anti-White ideology.

 

At the very least if you’re not going to list Antifa as a terrorist organisation, which they are and always fucking have been, at the very least you could stop the subversive ideology which leads young White people to anti-fascism. You can stop that being taught in schools. I went to a university. I was only there for like three weeks. I wanted to see if I could study anything without being identified and removed because of who I am.

 

[42:38]

 

And it turns out I wasn’t allowed to study anything in Australia without being identified and removed because of who I am. Students ended up finding out who I was within about three or four weeks. And they said “they felt threatened”. And the course leader told me that I could no longer continue to study in that course.

 

But in only in the three or four weeks that I spent in that classroom. There were several quizzes introduced by an Aboriginal activist. We had to get the answers to the quizzes correct. And they consisted of:

 

“How many poor innocent Aboriginals the White British colonials had slaughtered upon first landing on the shores of Australia during the time of the settlement of the First Fleet?”

 

And it was made to seem as though all the settlement of Australia consisted of was evil White people coming to this land and massacring innocent Aboriginals who did nothing wrong. And they’re trying to rewrite the establishment of Australia as an evil, genocidal campaign conducted by White people against poor innocent natives. In only three weeks of trying to sit through a course on psychology, I was exposed to that multiple times! And some of the students actually argued against the teacher. They said:

 

“How is this relevant to psychology?”

 

And she argued back at them first, that:

 

“It’s relevant because you’re going to have Aboriginal clients and you need to understand their trauma and the sorts of association your race or how they’re going to associate your race with having committed or put them through that trauma. And so you need to know how to deal with that.”

 

And also:

 

“If you had a problem with it, maybe this wasn’t the course for you?”

 

What she was saying was:

 

“If you have a problem with anything that I’m saying right now, if you have a problem with this subversive, hostile, ideological campaign, then you get out of this psychology course, you racist fks!”

 

That’s basically what she said. [chuckling]

 

So this is taught in schools all the time! The foundational ideology, the groundwork for anti-fascist terrorism is anti-White ideology. It’s White people committed all these crimes and need to suffer, need to be punished. No rights for White people! No dignity for White people, no future for White people! That’s what motivates anti-fascism. That’s what just got Charlie Kirk shot in the neck. And it’s being taught in schools still right now, state schools, university. There are activist professors still spreading this shit to this day. So at the very least that needs to stop.

 

Then once that stops, maybe we can talk about removing these professors and removing these people from the police force and government institutions and courts and every other institution that matters to prevent this kind of sick ideology being taught to people. Not only talk to people, but used to leverage the entire state apparatus against its own citizens.

 

Anyway, yeah, I think I’ve had my rant. But do you do the same thing? Well, usually on the streams, we don’t have such long individual segments. We allow each other to talk a little bit more and we chime in and that kind of thing.

 

So maybe for the rest of the stream we can make it more like that. And I’ll ask you, Joel, do you sit with your back to the wall? Do you understand your own peril [chuckling] or the peril that you’re in as a result of your opinions?

 

Joel Davis: I mean, yes, but at the same time I’m pretty relaxed because I’m not too worried about if:

 

“Oh, if some random anti-fascist sees me when I’m out.”

 

You know, I would say thousands of people, many thousands of people over the years have come up to me in public from recognizing me, from like, obviously seeing me on the Internet or in the newspapers or on the news or whatever. And basically every single time, I can’t think of even one instance when it wasn’t for a positive reason.

 

Maybe like one or two instances where it was negative. And they didn’t even come up to me directly. They basically, in both instances, they went up to the security guards of a bar I was drinking at and then I tried to explain to them that I’m a neo-Nazi, I need to be kicked out of the bar, for basically having political opinions and drinking beer at their establishment. And the security guards just looked kind of confused both times and then didn’t do anything.

 

So that’s it. Because these people are like individually pathetic losers. They need have an opportunity to get organised to engage in violence because they don’t have the capability to like, just like stand a bang, you know. There isn’t really like stand and bangers out there.

 

However, going out, you know, drinking or whatever, countless times I’ve ended up getting into fights with non-Whites, not because they know who I am, they have no idea who I am. Just because they violent and hateful towards White people and have low impulse control. So honestly, the threats in the public come more from the things that we’re actually talking about rather than who we are. Like just basically being a White guy in public in Sydney or Melbourne, going out on the piss, because there’s a lot of lunatics out there.

 

Blair Cottrell: The black guy on the bus that stabbed that Ukrainian girl, they’re saying that he’s just mentally ill. But what do you think? Because other people think that he was racially motivated, they’re trying to pass it off, …

 

[48:14]

 

Joel Davis: He was racially motivated. He said, literally on the video, he said:

 

“I just got that White bitch!”

 

And he’s surrounded by, like, five other black passengers on the train. He didn’t stab any of you know, so, …

 

Blair Cottrell: And it’s also feminist culture. It’s the fault of feminist culture. Like, why was this tiny White Ukrainian girl on her own at night on a bus traveling around? She was probably working some bullshit job to try to survive because feminism has created a culture where that’s what women have to do they have to travel around on their own, and they have to try to work to survive on their own because they don’t get married, and they don’t have men in their life to support them.

 

So, again, this is just a combination of racial prejudice and feminism!

 

Joel Davis: And then she’s from Ukraine. So in Ukraine, they don’t really have that many blacks. So she didn’t grow up, … She grew up in a relatively homogenous country and then goes to New York.

 

 

And if you grew up in New York you know, never to relax around blacks, to keep your wits about you when you take the subway or whatever. But because I guess she was a foreigner, I guess she was naive, and yes, I mean, it’s just a great tragedy. Seems like a beautiful young girl. I mean, what a horrible thing. It’s just completely senseless violence. But these two instances are two, you know, potent expressions of White genocide. People say:

 

“Oh, Charlie Kirk, he took hundreds of millions of shekels from the jews to be one of their top butt goys and advance a Containment Zionist message.”

 

And that’s true. That’s true! I don’t want to shit too much on the guy who just got brutally shot in front of his kids. That is true!

 

However, the reason why that happened, the motivation of why that happened, was of a genocidal hatred towards our race. And even if you’re one of these people who believe that it was a Mossad hit, that’s also motivated by a genocidal hatred towards our race. So whatever you believe that the Mossad did it and covered it up, or Antifa did it, either way, it was an act of White genocide. The motivation is whether it was jews or communists, our two principal enemies since time immemorial, they hate us and want to kill us and want to genocide our people.

 

Blair Cottrell: Let me play devil’s advocate to you, Joel. Are you saying that people should have the right to make misogynistic racist, sexist and transphobic comments in public, thereby encouraging hate in our society amongst the youth at university campuses? This guy is spreading hateful ideology! This is a proponent of hate! Should this be allowed? Shouldn’t this be met with some sort of resistance?

 

Joel Davis: Well, that itself is promoting hate.

 

Like, obviously everyone who’s justifying the murder of Charlie Kirk is themselves promoting hate! They’re promoting hatred of White people. They’re promoting hatred of conservatives or nationalists or whatever. So.

 

Blair Cottrell: But do you seriously think, do you seriously think for a second, right, for when you look at this for what it is, this is a man sitting there saying words. He’s just saying words with a microphone. And other people who are interested in the words he’s saying, or maybe a little conflicted about what he’s saying, they’re crowding around him to exchange some more words.

 

Then there’s someone with a rifle who shoots a bullet through the guy’s neck! The guy who’s saying words, a bullet through his neck, exploding his arteries and killing him almost instantly, right? But the words being spoken are considered more hateful than that bullet! That’s more dangerous to society. I suppose when you’ve got a society built on words are considered just as just as much of a national threat as bullets. And that’s what it feels like, the bullshit that I’m seeing all around the Internet. That’s what it feels like they’re trying to sell people. As though the words this guy spoke, the words Charlie Kirk spoke, justified a bullet going through his neck. Because the words were just as dangerous, if not more dangerous than that bullet.

 

What sort of shit are you trying to hide? What sort of bullshit society are you trying to prop up when words to your system, are just as or more dangerous than bullets? Like, ask yourself that, right? Ask yourself to try to get to the bottom of this bullshit!

 

But I don’t know, man! Are we going to keep talking about this? Because I keep seeing. I’ll be honest with you. I keep seeing him being shot in my mind. I keep seeing the footage that I’ve seen. And it just makes me really angry! It makes me sick and angry. I’m very frustrated by it. I know that we needed to talk about it, but, …

 

Joel Davis: Well, good. You should be frustrated and angry by it. Should make people angry. Because anger is a gift from the gods to motivate us to do what needs to be done. The only response, only valid response to this is organising and building a political movement that can seize control of the government and bring this entire ideology down of Leftism, that can eradicate it entirely from our society.

 

Blair Cottrell: Who can do that?

 

[53:39]

 

 

Joel Davis: That’s the only solution. We cannot share countries with these people and with these ideas, these genocidal ideas being institutionalised and normalised, directed at us! It’s existentially not possible. If this is allowed to continue, it’s going to keep getting worse, it’s going to keep escalating, and eventually we’re going to be put into camps, we’re going to be put into Gulags. It might not happen next year or the year after, but that’s where this is going. That’s where it ends up. Because as you said:

 

“Oh, well, isn’t it hateful the ideas that we put forward, and therefore, doesn’t that justify violence?”

 

But it’s a total mirror image. For them our wanting to continue existing as a people is unacceptable. And for us, them wanting to continue exist as a political movement has to be fundamentally unacceptable, too. And ultimately it’s going to be us or them! Either we seize the state and eradicate them, or they continue or complete the project of seizing the state and eradicate us. That’s where this all goes. And you can say:

 

“Oh, that’s an extreme message!”

 

Or whatever, but it’s the fucking truth! And I had not heard a single argument that is adequate against it, because if you just follow these things through to their logical conclusion, that’s where it’s going. And that’s why the Right has to get fascist. People say, and I’m just using this in a loose sense, but when you say:

 

“Oh, why are you talking about Hitler and why are you advocating for National Socialism? This going to alienate the normies. You know, if you just presented yourself as a nationalist conservative and wore a suit and played down any, …”

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, then they’ll shoot you., …

 

Joel Davis: Then you would appeal to more people. But at the same time, you would completely prevent yourself from actually promoting the idea that’ll win.

 

The idea that will win is the radical idea of actually using the state to crush our enemies. Anything less than that is not going to work. It’s unacceptable! You know, the conservatives win more elections than the Left, but then when they get in power, they don’t do anything. They’re fundamentally weak. They’re hamstrung by their own ideas. Trump is in power right now! We just discussed. He won’t go after Antifa. He won’t go after the far-Left. He won’t use this to actually, politically, advance.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why not? Why won’t he do that?

 

[Because Trump, like the rest of them is a stooge for Orgjew, that controls both parties and uses political divide as political theatre for the masses – K]

 

Joel Davis: Because then everyone would call him a fascist!

 

Blair Cottrell: Who cares! It’s a word! Fascist is a word. And they call everyone that. So who cares?

 

Joel Davis: Exactly! Well that’s exactly. Just be a fascist! Go:

 

“Yep, fuck you! I am a fascist. Time to go to prison libtards. Time to go to prison commies!”

 

Blair Cottrell: When the choice is to be a fascist or get shot, what are you going to choose?

 

Joel Davis: Exactly! Exactly! So that’s where this is.

 

But of course when it comes to Israel, all of a sudden he can be a fascist, all of a sudden, you know, which just really kind of exposes the bullshit of this whole scheme.

 

Another thing that I wanted to discuss though as well is its kind of related to this. You know, you see a lot of Right-wing objections. They say:

 

“When you say that you sound like a Leftist, being authoritarian is Leftist. You know, National Socialist, isn’t socialism Leftism?”

 

And you hear this kind of stuff. And they say:

 

“Well, if you’re truly Right-wing, you want freedom and liberal democracy and blah blah, blah!”

 

No! Yeah, like in a liberal democracy that’s functional, the right side is conservative, the left side is liberal, whatever.

 

But we don’t live in a functional liberal democracy. We live in a dysfunctional liberal democracy against an authoritarian Left. So we then have to mutate into a form that can compete and defeat the Left.

 

And the other side to this as well is that there is an alliance, a long established alliance between capitalism and Marxism against us! Against nationalists. We talked about this on the show before, many times. These were the two forces that made an alliance to destroy National Socialism and fascism in Europe. And these two forces still work in tandem today. The people who control international finance, the big corporations, they are in bed with this ideology.

 

You know, previously communists used to oppose themselves to the capitalists on a certain level, but this is long gone. Obviously if you talk to Leftists, they’ll express a whole series of anti-capitalist opinions. But in practice, ultimately their objective is to fight fascism far more than it is to fight capitalism. They critique capitalism academically, but when they actually mobilise in the street and engage in violence, it is against, quote, unquote, “fascism”. That’s the number one objective.

 

When it comes to the capitalist elite. They care more about fighting so-called “fascism” or racism or bigotry or whatever than they care about holding the socialist movement back. Because ultimately the social values of these two sides are basically equivalent. They agree on White genocide, they agree on transgenderism, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. They agree on feminism and so on. And that’s actually what’s more important.

 

For us as National Socialists or what have you on the radical Right, for us, we don’t want to destroy capitalism for the express purpose of making everybody equal. What we want to do is we want to free our nations from the grip of international finance and this international clique of which there’s some homegrown elements of businessmen and financiers that have no loyalty to our nation and ultimately have loyalty to globalism and to a social programme of engineering, to genocide our race. That is what we’re opposing and we’re trying to fix.

 

Blair Cottrell: But let me know, would you eliminate private enterprise altogether or would you still encourage that to a certain degree?

 

Joel Davis: National Socialists never did that they never eliminated private enterprise.

 

[1:00:09]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: So basically in a nutshell, you just stop, like foreign subversives, foreign interests, hostile people, …

 

Joel Davis: Take control of the financial system, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Lobbying from, like buying your media companies and lobbying your political institutions. Right, that’s what you stop.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! All National Socialism means is putting the interests of the nation first. It’s not this like libertarian ideology where the free market must be totally open. No, the national interest must come first. And it is in the national interest of people to be able to start their own businesses and own their own, you know, private property and so on. So that is maintained.

 

But also you need to have a certain amount of, … It needs to be balanced. There needs to be the state has to have power to intervene in the economy to ensure that the national interest is perpetuated.

 

So it’s a balancing. National Socialism is actually quite moderate when it comes to economic questions. But what it’s about is, it’s not about economically left versus economically right. We shouldn’t be defining Left and Right in terms of economics because the fundamental question is one of values. Before economics, humans are not economic entities. That’s actually a Marxist idea. Before, we are economic units, we are members of a national community. So our culture and our loyalty to one another must come first and foremost. That’s what National Socialism is about, getting the priorities correct.

 

And so when we come along, we basically are saying, before you define politics in economic terms, it’s actually a Leftist idea. We define politics in earlier terms. But National Socialists defend hierarchy. That’s why they’re considered far-Right. That’s why the Left understands National Socialists to be the far-Right and fascists to be the far-Right. They don’t recognise us as Leftists. They know that we’re on the other side. They fear us more than they fear you conservatives or libertarians. So clearly if the Left fears us the most, we’re their true enemy.

 

So this is just a ridiculous positing by these conservative elements.

 

When you look at the actual social values of these conservatives, they will be anti-racist just like the Left. They will be pro-gay marriage, just like the Left. They might even be pro-trans a lot of them. They basically adopt all the same social values as the Left does, but maybe a little bit less more moderate.

 

And then they go:

 

“We want low taxes, therefore we’re the true Right-wingers!”

 

Or something. It’s fucking ridiculous!

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, all socialism means is the group before the individual. That’s all it means, the group before the individual. What differentiates National Socialism from the Left is the perspective of what the group is. See the Left see the group as humanity and all of humanity being united against evil White devils. That’s the Left’s version of socialism. They pretend it’s about working class unity against capitalism, but that’s not actually what they believe. They’re kind of just borrowing old school communist literature.

 

And as I said, they over intellectualise their anti-White race hate. What the Left actually believe is uniting all peoples of the world against evil White devils! So to them the group is anyone and everyone, including White people, against White people! So you know, simple us versus them dynamic, simple common enemy and simple propaganda used to unite everyone against that common enemy.

 

But the kind of socialism, insofar as how it pertains to National Socialism, the group becomes the nation. And nation means race. It means a specific type of people, a specific ethnicity. So National Socialism could be understood as racial socialism. So like putting the interests of a specific ethnic group at the heart of everything you’re doing. It comes before the interests of the individual.

 

Joel Davis: And the key criticism of the National Socialists made of capitalism was not people owning their own businesses or owning their own homes or anything like that they supported that. Their primary criticism was of finance, of organised finance, of debt slavery. They wanted to liberate Germans from debt slavery! They didn’t want you stuck paying a mortgage to a bank the rest of your life. Because they understood that banks, because banks create money.

 

When you go to a bank and you get a credit card or you get a home loan, well, people don’t understand this. I say it a lot because a lot of people don’t understand this. The bank literally creates that money out of nothing. The bank isn’t a storehouse of money that previously exists. It creates money out of nothing and it expects you to pay it back out at interest. It’s a giant rort! The way the financial system is structured is a giant rort! It’s a parasitic rort! The banks, they don’t actually build anything. They don’t contribute anything. True value comes from productivity, from people who actually do a hard day’s work doing something productive in the economy. Banking is literally just moving numbers around in a computer system.

 

Okay, so like it does require a little bit of administrative work, but the exorbitant profits they make are far in excess of the actual value that is being created in that practice.

 

So that’s the criticism. National Socialists want to liberate the people from debt slavery by taking control of the financial system and eliminating usury from the system, which then liberates more wealth for the people and to ultimately to spur on economic development. That’s why when National Socialists came to power in Germany, there was what they called an “economic miracle.” Because they liberated the people from debt slavery. And immediately the German nation began advancing economically very quickly.

 

It was radically impoverished nation when the National Socialist took power in 1933, unemployment was like over 25%. The country was a mess. Within six years, within a year basically, they had full employment. And within six years Germany was so powerful it turned into like an industrial powerhouse that can compete with any nation on the planet. And it required basically the whole rest of the world to unite against it to defeat it in a six year World War. That doesn’t happen unless you have an incredible economic theory to advance the nation.

 

And that’s why the forces that rule us want to demonise National Socialism. Not just because they want to genocide our race, but they also don’t want nations realizing what Hitler and the National Socialists realised, which is that they can liberate basically how to liberate your nation from these parasitic international financial forces that the whole world is enslaved.

 

[1:07:23]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s not as complicated as having this genius economic theory. You basically just have to remove criminal elements and enemies to your country who are exploiting your country. Because having bad standards of living or just bad social situation generally is not a consequence of just people being unproductive or some sort of erroneous economic policy. People are unproductive and the economy is in turmoil because of all the corruption. Because people are exploiting circumstances to their own benefit. And if, like I said, if people are proud of themselves and they have a good reason to work hard, then productivity will increase and the economy kind of heals itself, especially if the corrupt criminal elements are removed from the economic process altogether.

 

Joel Davis: But what fundamentally, what I’m saying is that the financial system is fundamentally parasitic how it’s designed.

 

Blair Cottrell: So like, yeah, I’m not disputing that what I’m saying is, …

 

Joel Davis: The whole structure of our economy here in Australia is just basically built off debt slavery. It’s getting you into [word unclear] for the rest of your life when you’re basically paying rent to a bank to live in your own home.

 

Blair Cottrell: What I’m trying to say, what I was getting at is one of the things preventing a nationalistic revolution is the importation of foreign labour force to essentially prevent the country from spiraling into Weimar conditions. Because Australia would become so broken, so poor that people would vote for a revolutionary government. But in order to prop up the existing economy, the existing workforce needs to be replaced with as much foreign labour as possible and as fast as possible.

 

So to keep this system going, I think that’s the major difference between pre-World War II Germany and Australia right now! Australia would basically fall into a similar state of economic chaos, but because they’re able to just like keep replacing the traditional Australian working class with people who just accept worse conditions, live in smaller spaces, work for less, work longer hours for less, that kind of thing, then it kind of prevents things from getting bad enough that people will vote in that revolutionary government that will actually fix the problem, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but it’s just kicking the can down the road.

 

Blair Cottrell: It is, but it isn’t because if it leads to us failing to maintain our existence, then it’s not kicking the can down the road. It’s solving the problem that international capital currently has with White people. That is White people wanting a good amount of living space, White people wanting to be able to actually own property. That’s decent standard, decent standard of living. White people wanting rights and benefits and all that kind of stuff that we were raised to believe we should have.

 

Basically they’re standing in the way of international capital producing an effective slave class, or a slave race! I think that is the, at the heart of all conspiracies, that there’s a small network of very wealthy, very powerful people that are trying to breed a slave race! Which is going to be a combination of like Indian and Chinese and black people. It’s going to produce the perfect kind of low IQ subclass people that will never be intelligent enough to actually overthrow the government because they’ll never have a solid, meaningful identity. And to do away with the existing nations of the world the irritating White people who are irritating for reasons I just listed then that I think that is at the heart of all the greatest conspiracies in the world. The breeding of a slave race through coercion and force.

 

Joel Davis: Basically, you could say that, like capitalism and communism were like two jewish enslavement strategies.

 

Because as we’ve talked about on the show, I think some time ago, Werner Sombart’s Jews and Modern Capitalism*, where it’s like one of the best books ever written on the history of capitalism by one of the greatest economic historians ever! And he kind of painstakingly goes through the history of the beginnings of capitalism and how jews played a leading role basically in kind of reshaping European political and economic life through the period before and just after the Industrial Revolution. And capitalism basically is jewish!

 

[* https://archive.org/details/jewsandmodernca00sombgoog]

 

I’m not going to go into a whole diatribe about that text and I’m going to save it for another day, but I have done that on a previous episode.

 

But also, obviously, Karl Marx was a jew, and jews were instrumental in the development of Marxist ideology and the Bolsheviks. Jews are massively over-represented, etc, etc. Everyone knows this.

 

So then what happened with the rise of National Socialism was basically Europeans and fascism as well to a lesser extent, Europeans come up with a solution, a way to break free of both these forms of jewish enslavement. Then what has happened since World War II, and these two jewish enslavement machines essentially allying with one another to defeat National Socialism was we then moved from simply jews attempting to enslave Whites, whether it be enslave them through false promises of liberation. They sell you capitalism as:

 

“Oh goy, you’re on the free market. You get to choose where you want to work. You get to choose what you buy and sell. And so ultimately you’re within a free system!”

 

And obviously communism sells itself to you as it’s freeing you from the bondage of capitalism, freeing the worker from the bondage of the bourgeoisie. And so they’re kind of pseudo liberations that are really like forms of enslavement as we could see, in how they actually manifest in practice rather than in theory.

 

But then after World War II, where it became clear that the White man couldn’t be held down by these enslavement ideologies. Then it became necessary to genocide and replace Whites. It was no longer adequate to build a kind of communist dictatorship or build a liberal, democratic capitalist industrial system and just parasitically enslave and extract resources from a White underclass for a jewish elite.

 

Then what became necessary was gutting them entirely because now they couldn’t trust the White man to be a good little goy! Now they real the White man had ideas of his own, overthrew this system and built a third option, National Socialism, that both destroyed Marxism and destroyed kind of usury finance capitalism and liberated the nation from these two systems.

 

And so now what you see is these two systems mutate into genocidal forms. So now finance capitalism mutated into this globalist form which basically generates mass immigration and the liquidation of national cultures and this kind of mongrelisation process across the West. And then Leftism went from being primarily focused upon, kind of economic dimension to basically being an explicit ideology of White genocide. That basically what so-called Cultural Marxism is the idea that:

 

“Well the White working class, we shouldn’t be trying to build a political movement out of it because the White working class are Patriarchal and nationalistic bigots! And so the White working class will just create a fascist movement if they’re allowed to, if they’re left to their own devices. So we have to actively undermine them by spreading feminism and multiculturalism and you know, gay and transing, you know, up as many of their kids as possible and render them politically useless by reducing them to unaffectatious minority with their own women and mental defectives turned against them and so on.”

 

As we see now. So that’s basically how we’ve got into this position. And National Socialism was the solution to the first option.

 

And the second option was basically built as an anti-fascist adaptation of these two systems. Like the reason why capitalism turned into a globalist ideology was to prevent anything resembling nationalism from being regenerated. That if they could just like mix all the populations of the global marketplace together and mix the economies together and make them as complexly interwoven as possible, then there would be no national bodies that could resist this international financial matrix.

 

And again, if they could fundamentally undermine White culture and mongrelize and destroy our kind of core stock as much as possible, eventually the damage would be so great that it would be impossible for us to ever build anything resembling a fascist movement ever again! That’s explicitly what these theorists say, more or less. And I’m obviously taking a bit of interpretive icence, but not that much.

 

So that’s why we believe what we believe and why what we believe fundamentally is the only solution. Because no other political ideology truly confronts these problems.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s been a good stream so far. And we’ve got a fair few viewers tonight, probably because we haven’t had a solid stream in a few weeks. I think. I’ve been absent and you know, last week we had some technical issues. I had some technical issues anyway, but thanks everybody for tuning in and thanks for staying with us.

 

We’ve probably got a couple of other subjects to cover before we wrap it up. Joel, I know that we have the whatever they were there was like some Australia Unites march, which seems to have just detracted from the stop immigration message that took place a day or two ago, I think we can get into that a little bit. And we’ve also got a bit of an update on Tom Sewell’s situation in the Victorian courts.

 

But what do you reckon about the Australia Unites marches or rallies? Did you see any footage?

 

Joel Davis: Let’s talk about Sewell in court first and then I’ll pull that up. So I’m going to pull up a couple videos to show the difference between the two marches, at least in Melbourne.

 

Blair Cottrell: But as far as I know what I’ve been told, I’ve been flat out with work personally this week. So I haven’t had a lot of time because you can actually watch a lot of Tom Sewell’s legal proceedings through video link, I think. And I have a couple of mates who have been doing that and filling me in on what’s been happening. He was found guilty of intimidating a police officer for talking about or discussing some personal details regarding that police officer on this stream, I believe. On The Joel and Blair Show last year.

 

[1:18:53]

 

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know if you remember the full context, but I remember the context and this, by the way, is unrelated to the recent arrest. He just happened to be in court fighting this other charge when he was arrested in relation to what happened on August 31st. And Tom was found guilty of this, but he was only given 200 hours community service. So I guess it’s not that big of a deal, all things considered because there’s no custodial sentence and the real fight is ahead of him with this August 31st stuff like the assault charges and so on relating to that day.

 

But basically, people might remember we did two, what we called “Fuck Off We’re Full” rallies. We had a big Fuck Off We’re Full banner last year. The rallies were counter-protests against, … There was basically communists in Melbourne, had and around the country. But in Melbourne was where we did these rallies. They had organised a whole series of subcontinental and Middle Eastern people who were so-called refugees and wanted basically permanent visas to stay in Australia to basically protest out the front of the Department of Home affairs and demand permanent visas, as if they’re just entitled to permanent visas because they say so.

 

And as we went down to counter-protesters twice, once originally, and then when they basically had their big hundred days of doing this permanent Visa encampment thing, they did a big rally, and we went in counter-protest at their big subsequent rally. At that event, people might remember, I got pepper sprayed in the face. I was the only guy there without a mask on for that one. A lot of the boys got pepper sprayed. We still continued the rally anyway and it turned into a success. It was a media success. It was kind of a cool NSN rally.

 

But during the process of that rally, when we first went up to the encampment when we all got pepper sprayed, there was a couple police officers in plain clothes who had batons and they were pretty violent towards some of our members. Nathan Bull actually was hit with the baton multiple times and he kind of just like guarded it with his arm like this. And he had like huge marks down his arm. Obviously he’s a tough boy, so he was okay, but it was just totally unnecessary and senseless violence. And this one, this individual who assaulted Nathan Bull also when we., … Because after we got pepper sprayed, we decided to just go around the corner and go to a different position and just do the rally there anyway. And we just completed the rally regardless.

 

And as we were doing that, this police officer came up to another one of our activists who was just standing there peacefully in the park. He wasn’t engaging in violence or he was just standing there doing the chants and so on, and went to grab at his balaclava and try and rip his balaclava off. And the guy pushed the cop away and step, kind of like took a step back and the cop kind of gave up on the whole idea. That’s assault. Grabbing someone else’s article of clothing is assault.

 

So the police officer assaulted multiples of our members and obviously that second assault was with the intent to pull his balaclava up so that his face would be broadcast on national television as a way to dox him. What Tom said on the stream was like, Tom literally said:

 

“I’m going to look at the law and figure out if this is legal first, and how to do it. But I looked into this guy, I know what his real name is. And in the past when our activists have been assaulted, we’ve made complaints and nothing has come of it. No one cares. Apparently the police are just legally allowed to just assault us for no reason with no accountability.”

 

And he said:

 

“Well, the only recourse I have now is public accountability, so maybe I should say who this police officer is. But I look into the laws around it. So I don’t want to commit a crime like intimidating a police officer or something.”

 

But he kind of speculated that he would, that there had to be some kind of public accountability on this kind of behaviour, because this behaviour can’t go on. Tom was then charged with intimidating a police officer for that. And he was subsequently found guilty. I mean, it’s just a ridiculous judgement! But like I said, he didn’t get a custodial sentence. He got 200 hours community service, which I presume he’ll have to log when he gets out of jail.

 

But you know, considering the more serious things that he’s facing, it’s probably the last thing on his mind now that it’s over, gonna focus on fighting these more serious charges. But it’s just ridiculous that he would be legally charged and then found guilty for something like that, when you really consider the context.

 

Blair Cottrell: What did he actually say for that he was found guilty for, though?

 

Joel Davis: Intimidating a police officer. Because apparently, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I know that but on what basis was he found guilty? What did they claim that he said?

 

Joel Davis: They said that the police officer and the police officer’s wife felt intimidated that Tom Sewell knew their address and was contemplating, …

 

Blair Cottrell: So he said on the stream:

 

“I know their address.”

 

Is that what he said?

 

Joel Davis: Well, he said he looked up the guy and then he’s like, all of his personal information is all over everything. I can see what he’s housed, I can see his wife. He’s like, he didn’t say he was going to release any of that stuff. He just said, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I still kind of I get your perspective, but at the same time I don’t know, I don’t know. That’s a bit sketchy. It’s a bit sketchy to be like:

 

“Hey, I know where this guy lives and I’ve got pictures of his wife.”

 

You know what I mean? It’s like, …

 

[1:24:42]

 

Joel Davis: Like what he said that when he looked up who the guy is, the guy himself had pictures of his house and his wife on his social media.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Joel Davis: So he was trying to say, like, this guy’s just got all of his stuff up on his social media. It’s quite reckless. And he doesn’t want to be held accountable. Maybe he shouldn’t have. That was kind of, I guess, point, but his point. He also said:

 

“I’m not going to put anything out until I look at the law and figure out what to do legally, because I don’t want to break any laws here.”

 

And then he didn’t actually follow it up by doing anything.

 

Blair Cottrell: So he didn’t share any information.

 

Joel Davis: No.

 

Blair Cottrell: He just said that he has information.

 

Joel Davis: That he knew it. Yeah. That he looked into who this guy was because he thought the public should know that this individual thinks that he’s got the right to just assault political peaceful political activists. That is unlawfully.

 

Blair Cottrell: He was found guilty on those grounds. Specifically. He hasn’t been sentenced to any jail time, but he’s still in jail. That’s because he’s been held on remand for a series of other charges. Remand means the police have convinced a judge that you’re a danger to society, a flight risk, or you’re going to reoffend.

 

And so you’re kept in police custody or state custody up until your court date. You do have more opportunities to apply for bail in the future, but usually you apply every three to six months, especially if you’re appealing a bail application to a higher court. That can take longer than three months, and I believe that’s what he’s trying to do.

 

So how long is Tom in jail for? At this point, no one’s sure. I’m pretty sure he’ll be applying for bail again soon. In the next few months, perhaps. I’m not exactly sure a date. However, what I can tell you is he’s been held on remand because a judge has been convinced that he’s a danger to society. A magistrate accepted that argument from the police prosecution.

 

He has quite a number of charges. He’s facing quite a number of charges as a result of some of his activity on August 31st. And we’ll keep you guys updated. I suppose I’ll keep you guys updated as well on what’s going on. I do know that you can through a certain system available which I didn’t even know about because you know I did some jail time a long time ago, and back then you had to physically write letters into prisoners.

 

But now there’s a system where you can email a prisoner and as long as you confirm and prove your identity to the email prisoner system, you can actually send him a letter that way if you want to. And I know he would appreciate letters. Jail gets very boring. It’s a very boring, mundane place. He’ll do the best he can to keep himself occupied with books but it’s going to be great for him to get letters. I know that he’ll appreciate that.

 

I’ll try to figure out while Joel shows you guys, show you, shows you guys this video that email a prisoner link and I’ll post it in the live chat and maybe we’ll leave it.

 

Joel Davis: I think the White Australia Telegram page, I’ve shared it before. You can find it on their account and you can share it how basically because you need, … You want to write Tom a letter or you want to send him an email, you need to address it to him regardless.

 

So the information on how to do that is on the White Australia Telegram page. So you should just share it on Telegram and people can see it there.

 

But anyway, I want to show everyone a difference. Two videos. This video is in Melbourne on August 31st and for the Stop Immigration Anti-mass immigration March for Australia rally.

 

 

 

See absolutely massive crowd all the way down the street. Just absolutely packed as far as you can see in every direction.

 

Now I’m going to show you the crowd from the September 13. What was it?:

 

“Anti digital ID, government corruption, anti-racist, pro-aboriginal, we’re not Nazis, but we also think maybe a slight reduction in immigration would be good rally!”

 

I’m not kidding! That’s literally what it was. I’ll show you that crowd in Melbourne from last week. Same camera angle. That’s the crowd.

 

 

vv There you go guys. That’s the crowd.

 

Joel Davis: So as you can see, everyone said:

 

“Oh, if the NSN show up to this rally no one will want to come. And you can’t just make a rally against mass immigration and talk about how there’s too many Indians in Australia and how we’ve got to shut down the borders. It’s too extreme, it’s too radical! No one will show up. No one wants that. We need to we need to cuck it out!”

 

So basically the people who said that and who tried to hijack August 31st and turn it into a cuckservative, pro-zionist, pro-aboriginal, anti-racist event, we made sure that they didn’t. And so they held their own event on September 13th to line up with the jewish agent Tommy Robinson’s big anti-immigration rally in London. Which was massive, to be fair. I think they had some estimates a quarter of a million people there. I’ve seen some estimates even more. Looked like a lot of people in London.

 

But to line up with that, they held these all over the country. And the crowds were quite disappointing. I think the largest crowd might have been in Sydney, but it was still only a small fraction of what there was on August 31st.

 

[1:30:29]

 

And also a lot of the people that were there thought that they were there for another March for Australia, fuck immigrants rally. And then when the speeches started, they realised, oh:

 

“Shit! This is cucked!”

 

And they all just left. There’s even footage I saw from Brisbane which only had maybe like one and a half thousand people max, maybe a thousand people show up. Then the organiser got on the stage and did like a half hour speech meandering around, where he spent half the speech talking about how:

 

“The March for Australia was run by Nazis and it’s a psyop to try and divide races and that we need to be united regardless of whether you’re black, White or brown or whatever.”

 

And he started talking about how we need to unite with Muslims and all this kind of stuff. And the crowd started heckling him and getting angry. And they all, more than half the crowd seemed to have walked off by the time he finished speaking.

 

So huge L [loss] for these people that they were all attacking and criticising August 31st. A lot of them were non-White. A lot of them have links with establishment conservative circles. No one’s buying what you’re selling! No one wants what you’re selling. Your politics sucks! It’s not interesting, it’s not dynamic!

 

And what it shows is that controversy sells. The reason why there was a massive turnout on Aug 31 was because the government was condemning it, the media was condemning it. Running stories about how Nazis are involved, running stories about how the organisers have denied the “Holocaust”, or the organisers justified violence during the Cronulla riots, or the organisers are racist or the organisers hate Indians, whatever. That amped it up and that made people want to come!

 

So the people want nationalism, the people want racism! The people don’t want slop conservative garbage! And I feel vindicated that our kind of politics is ascendant. And all the people on the Right that say that we’re horrible and we need to be marginalised and discluded because we’re fringe. Well, actually more people want to come and march with us on the issues that we care about, then want to come and march with you for your garbage. So who’s actually fringe? I think you’re fringe!

 

Blair Cottrell: I already made a post about this on my public Telegram channel. But just to summarize, it just seems like all the we’re getting so many live comments on this show. Appreciate all the support, guys. And I’ll just add the Superchats you guys want to leave. They’ll all be read out at the end.

 

The messages of what was it like stopping racism and digital IDs and, I don’t know, things that are legitimate concerns for people to some degree. It just seemed like an effort to detract from the main source of the problem, which is the government just basically replacing the Australian worker right now with as many people as possible from India. Everyone sees and feels that. And everyone is feeling the impact on the standard of living as a consequence of that immigration policy.

 

And what, like, why can’t that just be addressed for the problem that it is without “racism” and all that kind of stuff flying around? It’s like, I think people are sick of anti-racism. People are sick of it! Because it’s really gay! Anti racism is really weak and gay k, and people are sick of it!

 

So every effort the more conservative types are trying to make to still maintain that more centrist position in order for in order to appeal more to the masses, that time is over now. I understand the urge to do that. I understood it more five years ago than I do now. But you got to adapt and move with the times.

 

And as things become more radical, people are willing to accept more radical positions. And hey, everyone’s actually racist! The people who are accused of the most racism are ironically, the least racist people in the world right now, which is White people. Black people are racist, Asians are racist. Everyone’s racist. It’s a very natural phenomena. It’s pretty normal to be racist. Your baby’s racist when it’s born. It prefers to be around people that it can recognise as similar to its own kinship. So don’t be so scared of that racist bullshit! Don’t be so scared of that word. It’s just a word. It’s just bullshit!

 

Joel Davis: And so all these people online that are like:

 

“Oh, if you have Nazis at your rally and if you say racist stuff, no one’s gonna show up and no one wants to march with you!”

 

All those people that say that shit that are in the conservative online opinion having sphere, they just had their little fucking cuck rally and no one wants to show up to your cuck rally, actually! People want to show up to an Aussie pride rally, actually!

 

Blair Cottrell: Nazi is just a word as well. And Nazi means National Socialist. And the people who represent that position, they don’t believe that any gassing of 6 million people in gas chambers happened. They think that that’s war propaganda. The people who actually represent that opinion, they think that’s all made up! So trying to dehumanise or vilify people as “Nazis” because they want to genocide people, it’s very disingenuous. Government bureaucrats and academics, you know, “leaders” of popular culture, they’re still using that disingenuous argument by deliberately misrepresenting what so-called “Nazis” actually believe in order to make them out to be villains.

 

In reality, they’re all just people. They’re people who believe that the masses have been fed vicious lies about history and they want to tell the truth! Not only do they want to tell the truth, they want to provide solution to the problems this country has. That’s the truth! We’re not dealing with some sort of brutal, horrible monster out there! There’s not Nazi zombies lurking around every corner waiting to eat your brains! This doesn’t. [chuckling] Everyone’s a person with a real opinion except the anti-fascists.

 

The only people who basically are unreasonable, unwilling to debate or open dialogue, and who just want to kill you for the sins of your ancestors. As I’ve already laid out at the beginning of this stream, the far-Left anti-fascists, they’re the only ones that pose a serious threat to your family and to society. Everybody else you’ll find is generally reasonable, especially the so-called racists!

 

Joel Davis: But also all of these people who advance this argument:

 

“Oh, no one likes the Nazis, no one wants to be associated with the Nazis. That’s going to like kill the rally. And we’ve got to distance ourselves from them, …”

 

Pretty much all of them are actually non-White or they have a non-White wife or husband or they’re jewish or they work in the conservative establishment or something. They all have ulterior motives. They’re against nationalism, period! Not just against Nazism, they’re against nationalism and they’re trying to water down the message. They don’t stand for White Australia! They don’t stand for keeping Australia White. They don’t stand for the actual historical Australian people in our interests.

 

And so anti-Nazi is anti-White. Anti Nazi is actually anti-Australia from all of these people, just like it is from the politicians when they attack us. They don’t want to debate us on substance. They basically just want to try and scare you into not associating with us or being afraid to work with us or afraid to be seen supporting us because of the social penalty:

 

“Oh, everyone will freak out and no one wants to hear that message!”

 

And it’s just gaslighting! *

 

[* Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which a person or group causes someone to question their own reality, memories, or perceptions, often leading to confusion, loss of confidence, and dependence on the manipulator. The term originates from the 1938 play (and later film) Gas Light, where a husband deliberately dims the gas lights in their home and then denies it, making his wife doubt her sanity. See Gaslighting in White Glossary.]

 

 

But actually the rally that we showed up to, that we were publicized as supporting and attending and so on was way more successful than their version. So what it shows is actually you need us there! We provide the controversy, we provide the radicalism, we provide the protective shield to keep all of that crap out and keep the actual pure message in! And to the success of August 31 a lot of people that aren’t in the NSN made that possible, but you know, we were an integral element in it because without us there to push all of those forces out, they probably would have had a lot more success in hijacking it, subverting it, watering it down, and then you wouldn’t have a real nationalist rally and instead you would just be given what you were given on September 13th.

 

Basically a whole bunch of anti-racist speeches and cuckservative meandering about digital ID and you know, fucking global warming and how we need to burn more coal and all this like side issue bullshit! We’re being fucking genocided! Our country’s being stolen from us! That is the number one issue. That’s what matters! All this other stuff is secondary.

 

So it was great to see their rally fail. And you know there’s going to be another march for Australia I’m hearing in late October. Interesting to see how that goes.

 

But the big one, the big one is going to be Australia Day! On Australia Day next year, I know March for Australia is going to mobilise full force. We are going to mobilise every nationalist group and organisation, and every nationalist individual in Australia needs to mobilise on Australia Day. We need to flood our cities with Aussies, with Aussie flags and patriotic spirit! I mean take our cities back on Australia Day. Take it back from the communist Aboriginal garbage that has taken it over in recent years, and reassert our national pride and our sovereignty over this country. That is the big one!

 

And I think the success of August 31st and hopefully the continued success of the October 19th rally, I believe, and so on, will help, you know, set the stage for a massive mobilisation on Australia Day. To me, that’s the big one! Because if on Australia Day, patriots mobilise in their droves and take back all the cities of Australia a sea of Aussie flags and White faces, I think it will be a kind of spiritual revival of sorts of our people.

 

Because Australia is under attack, our national identity is under attack. Obviously, we live under a regime that is occupying us and calls itself the Australian government and pretends to be representative of Australia, but actually hates Australia! And is really trying to destroy Australia! The people rising up against it en masse, because the biggest issue we have in Australia is, I would say, apathy! The average Australian wants Australia to keep being Australia and isn’t happy with the direction of the country. But they’re not doing anything. There’s no vehicle for them to express that. I think this could be something quite powerful. I thought August 31st changed the mood in Australia. I think Australia Day could be even more potentially potent in changing the national mood and setting the tone for a new paradigm.

 

Blair Cottrell: The State’s going to be used to rough us up a bit before that happens. The average Australian will be fine if you’re just a regular march attendee, but anyone who has any kind of influence, any positive reputation, good standing with the public right now, whether it’s people streaming public, speakers, organisation leaders. Yeah, they’re going to come up with whatever they can to harass us, get us into court.

 

I’m going to do my best to stay out of all that shit, but we’ll see what they come up with, because it turns out I’m on their radar, too, despite not really doing anything apart from appearing on these streams. Interesting! It’ll be interesting indeed to see what they come up with. But whatever. It’s all new territory we’re moving into now. Like, it’s not just a matter of going to court for some summary hate speech offence or losing your bank account or the stuff that we’re used to, they’re going to ramp it up and they’re going to try new things to shut us up. And I don’t even know what they’re going to come up with, but it’s a little bit concerning.

 

But whatever, you know whatever! We’re in too deep now. We’ve come too far to turn back.

 

[1:42:56]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, anyway, maybe we could do the Superchats and wrap the show up.

 

Blair Cottrell: That sounds good because I wanted to go to the gym. I haven’t been to the gym yet.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, Blair going to the gym. But I didn’t realise you went to the gym, Blair.

 

Blair Cottrell: I sometimes do that. Yeah, sometimes. Sometimes a mate of mine just fills me in with some really interesting spergy facts about history while I’m in the gym.

 

A lot of people like that video about the fingers, the story about the British fingers, and a lot of people told me they don’t think it’s true. There’s a mixed opinion about that. And what I’m talking about is where the “rude finger” came from. I won’t do it on the show because I’m obviously not vulgar like that, but this finger from the British. You know how the British are like “up yours”. Yeah. Joel told me during one of our workouts a while ago.

 

Joel Davis: It’s good folklore. It’s good folklore. Like who cares if it’s true or not? It’s exceptional folklore. It’s ancient, you know, Anglo Saxon folklore.

 

Blair Cottrell: What we’re talking about, what we’re talking about, if you don’t know, is apparently the French, when they would capture British archers or longbowmen, they’d use these fingers for archery to pull the bow back. And when they captured those archers that cut their fingers off to prevent them from firing any more arrows.

 

But if you still had your fingers and you came up against the French you do this as like a gesture of rebellion or insolence like:

 

“Hey, we still have our fingers. We can still shoot you!”

 

And then eventually, like, one finger dropped and it just became the rude finger. But some people say that’s not the case, that the rude finger is an exclusively American phenomena. But I don’t know. I think there’s merit to the theory that Joel put out there. And it is cool folklore. Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Anyway, I was taught that as a young boy, and I think a lot of Anglo Saxons were taught that as a young boy. It’s folklore of our people. And I don’t care what some jewish anthropologist says that’s trying to deconstruct our ancient lore.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s like no one let’s you have anything, do they? Anything interesting or cool from you know White or European history. It’s just like you’ve got some fact checker thing saying:

 

“False, that’s not true! It’s not that cool actually!”

 

But the Superchats I listed, if you want to read them out, Joel, I listed them.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ll read them out. So WhiteBitch666 said:

 

“Fuck these psychotic commies. I’m so sick of all these tranny lovers in my country. They will try to kill you if you refuse to call a broad chinned man a woman, or recognise difference between races.”

 

Well, I think I feel you on that one. The Bearded Indian said:

 

“Communism is an expression of Judaism. Trump will not designate Antifa a terrorist organisation because that would contravene the interests of Trump’s jewish donors.”

 

I don’t know if that’s necessarily. I mean, I agree with you that communism is a product of the jews, obviously. But I don’t know if that’s where Trump’s apprehension comes from because Antifa has caused problems for Israel. Because the communists and the Zionists don’t see eye to eye on that issue.

 

So I don’t know if the Zionist donors behind Trump would even really get in his way on Antifa, which only makes it all the more pathetic! That he basically has nothing holding him back other than his own weakness, basically, and his own political like assertion.

 

Blair Cottrell: How do we know? It’s still early days and the FBI is still doing its investigation. So how do we know that he won’t turn around and list them?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I just, it’s not the vibe that I’m getting and it’s not the vibe that I’m getting.

 

Blair Cottrell: He might go for one obscure Leftist group. Like there’s a Leftist group that’s been named here as possibly associated with the Charlie Kirk’s assassin called the Democratic Socialists of America. It just looks like, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s not an obscure group Blair. That’s actually a massive group!

 

Blair Cottrell: It looks really gay and shit though their logo is really crap. So I thought it was just thrown together online or something.

 

Joel Davis: Well, like, let’s look it up. How many members does the Democratic Socialist of America have? 85,000.

 

Blair Cottrell: I suppose that’s decent. Yeah. But maybe you can start off by listing a group like that as a terror org. Right. And then you work your way up.

 

Joel Davis: I mean, that would be cool if they look, if they do that, that’d be pretty fucking cool! Liam4 said:

 

“Has Blair finished Doom Eternal yet?”

 

That’s for you, obviously.

 

[1:47:33]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I finished it, but I saw a lot of videos of people who are really good at it. Like, really good! Because that game has been out for a while. And I wanted to get that good too.

 

So I started like, changing all the binds on my keys and my mouse buttons and I started practicing to try to do quick switching as best I could while staying in the air as often as I could. This is Doom Eternal. And I got really mad, bro! [chuckling] I gotta be honest. That game is really hard. It’s one of those games that it doesn’t matter how good you get, the AI system of the enemies is so aggressive and sophisticated that they’ll just chase you down and really make you have a bad day. I did finish the game, to answer your question, in short.

 

But then I started playing it to try to become really good at it, and I just got really angry with it. I got kind of good, but not as good as some people are. Like the videos I’ve seen on YouTube of gameplay on Doom Eternal. Fucking insane! It’s like really cool how good at something people can get, guys especially. But the more I tried to play Doom Eternal and get better at it, the more I started thinking I should do piano or something if I’m going to commit to something that’s like I’m going to get really good at, I should do it with something that’s a little bit more sophisticated or cultured than Doom Eternal. [chuckling] I mean, am I a bit of a nerd for thinking that? I don’t know?

 

Joel Davis: No, no. You’re 100% correct in thinking that. ItWasMadeUp said:

 

“Did Striker ever respond to the debate offer?”

 

He turned it down. So [Mark] Collett proposed the idea that because Eric Striker, I guess an old associate turned annoying retard on the Internet, he started throwing shade at Tom Sewell and myself. He started criticising Tom after the August 31 rallies. Because in Tom’s speech he says:

 

“Oh, when the Palestinians and the communists came for the Aussie flags, it was us that defended them.”

 

And then Striker said:

 

“Oh, look, the NSN in Australia, they’re not real National Socialists because they’re attacking Palestinians and they’re playing into the hands of the jews!”

 

And it was just so ridiculous! At the same rally, the NSN threw Zionists out, including Avi Yemeni and his goons. We push Zionists out behind the scenes of the rally in general.

 

And obviously we’re anti-jewish and anti-zionist, fundamentally. We’ve always had a policy of staying out of the way of the pro-Palestine rallies. We don’t want to be attack dogs for the jews. We’re not going to help the jews out by taking out their enemy. We’re going to let them deal with their own problem.

 

But the Palestinians have been rallying in the street. And let’s be real, the Palestinian issue has been hijacked by communists, particularly in Melbourne, that then use it for, to give them an excuse to rally every week. Because they can’t get people to rally every week around communism, but they can get people to rally every week around the Palestine issue. And so they’ve hijacked the pro-Palestine thing.

 

But the other pro-Palestine groups that are run by like Arabs and stuff have been complicit and work with these communist groups. So, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Why have they done that? Why do the Arabs work with transvestites and Marxists and feminists and all these weird cunts from the city? Like, why do the Muslims tolerate that shit?

 

Joel Davis: Well, obviously it has some benefit because the Left has made concessions to the pro-Palestinian side. And so there’s obviously some political benefit they achieve from that.

 

But anyway, they cast their die with these communists. And in the lead up to this rally, I got intelligence from my sources in the pro-Palestine movement. A few sources that are a little bit more anti-communist, were telling me that there was a little bit of infighting inside the movement and that some pro-Palestinian voices that are predominantly Arabs were saying:

 

“We don’t want to be oppositional to the march for Australia, rather just like do our own thing and avoid it.”

 

And the communists insisted, particularly in Melbourne:

 

“No, (and I think in Brisbane as well.) No, the pro-Palestine march must mobilise and attack basically the March for Australia!”

 

And I put out a post, I said:

 

“Don’t play into the hands of the communists. Come out now, oppose this. Distance the pro-Palestine movement from this.”

 

Because I wanted to March for Australia to be a success. I didn’t want it to be attacked. We have left the pro-Palestine movement alone for two years! We asked them to leave us alone for one day! And okay, the communists attack us. You could say:

 

“Oh, but the communists, just dressed up as, brought Palestinian flags and attacked you. You can’t blame that on the pro-Palestine movement.”

 

Okay, but who in the pro-Palestine movement has come out in the days since and condemned the violence of people that are wearing the kaffir and holding the Palestine flags, condemned the violence that they perpetrated against Australian patriots? And said:

 

“Oh, we don’t agree with that. And we disavow that.”

 

Blair Cottrell: I did not. I did Notice that on August 31st though, the Muslims weren’t with the Leftists counter-protesters. The Palestinians really weren’t. There was Palestinian flags.

 

Joel Davis: In Melbourne there wasn’t that many there, of course. I agree with this. But they didn’t publicly distance themselves or condemn it. Right? They should have said:

 

“Not in our name. We don’t agree with this. We don’t want to, …”

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but I think by just not showing up, by saying nothing and not showing up, that is basically saying it.

 

[1:53:19]

 

Joel Davis: But they didn’t completely not show up in the sense that there were like the pro-Palestine movement officially was on the posters and there were brown people at the counter-protests. I saw some in the Sydney counter-protest images and so on. It wasn’t all Whites, so, …

 

But look, when Tom said the Palestinians, he wasn’t saying, he wasn’t insinuating himself in the Palestine Israel conflict. He wasn’t taking the side of Israel against Palestine. He was just talking about the pro-Palestinian protesters.

 

Blair Cottrell: People can only think in simplistic dynamics. And so as soon as you criticise only one thing but not the other, or you mention one thing and not the other, people assume that you’re declaring some sort of allegiance or, not allegiance necessarily, but favouritism to the other side.

 

And that’s why people started accusing him of being pro-Israel because he only called out Palestinians in that segment of the speech. But he didn’t say anything about Israel. And that’s how simple people are.

 

Joel Davis: Tom Sewell, he calls out Israel way more than he calls out Palestine. Like in general he talks about Israel and jews a lot. If you go on his Telegram, you type in Israel and then he’s had to make a whole series of new Telegrams. So it’s not even an old Telegram. But if you go to like, because it’s been banned from Telegram so many times. I went to the Tom Sewell Telegram, I typed in “Israel”. There was 43 results! Like the guy talks about, … Tom Sewell’s an anti-semite, Nazi! Obviously he’s anti-Israel.

 

Blair Cottrell: What we’re talking about here is we know this and most people watching the stream know this, but I’m talking about the average capacity for understanding can only see in black or white. That’s why when you say socialism, we’re, …

 

Joel Davis: We’re talking about a guy, Eric Striker, who I have known for years.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but he could be just using that, …

 

Joel Davis: A National Socialist, who knows who I am, knows who Tom is, and has interacted with us on the Internet for many, many, many years. Right? He knows that he’s full of shit! And so he’s literally lying! And then trying to present us as if we are Zionists, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Why do you think he’s doing that? What’s the motivation?

 

Joel Davis: I think he’s doing it because I think he’s got an issue with us because we’re not pro-Russia, and he’s like a pro-Russia shill. And he has a personal issue with me and I think he has a personal issue with Tom.

 

So I think Tom insulted him at some point many years ago and I had a personal falling out many years ago. And so he’s putting personal petty bullshit and a difference of opinion on some other issue, which he may or may not be aligned with because he’s getting funding from a particular source or what have you, ahead of the so-called movement that apparently we’re both a part of undermining us and attacking us, Australian National Socialists.

 

And we just had a massive success. And we just had a huge propaganda and public relations success. The whole, like I saw the whole world was talking about what was happening on the March for Australia. It was a massive story! And we had done a lot of work kicking Zionists out. He said:

 

“Oh it was a Zionist rally because Paul Pauline Hanson marched in Brisbane (who shouldn’t even give a speech). And Bob Katter gave a speech in fucking Townsville.”

 

Who cares about the fucking Townsville march? No Zionist gave speeches in Sydney or Melbourne or any of the big major marches, that I’m aware of he’s presenting it like as if we went and like beat up communists to facilitate like big Zionist rally, which is disingenuous! We said from the beginning:

 

“We are going to secure this rally from all foreign influence. Zionist, Chinese, Russian, Palestinian, any foreign issue. That’s not the day for it. Today is the day for Australia!”

 

We do not have to make arrangements to not upset Palestinians in our own country when we’re rallying for our own country’s cause. They need to make arrangements to not upset us! They need to make arrangements to distance themselves from people attacking us. It is their obligation. They are the fucking visitors. This is our country! But they have no respect.

 

And so we are supposed to bend over backwards to care about the feelings of the pro-Palestine movement and Tom can’t say one thing in a speech that could be misinterpreted in a certain way? Where’s the Palestinians coming out and showing sympathy for the fact that people dressed up in Palestinian garb and beat up old men and old ladies for being Australian patriots? Where are they coming out and condemning this and trying to say:

 

“We’re not against the Australian people, we just fighting for our homeland against Israel.”

 

And Australia just recognised Palestine as a state, by the way. To say:

 

“Thank you, Australians aren’t the enemy!”

 

No! There’s a lot of anti-White elements in their movement that don’t give a shit about Australian patriots! Don’t give a about Australian nationalism! And they say:

 

“Always was, always will be!”

 

Align themselves with Aboriginals, align themselves with anti-White positions. And Eric Striker, the little faggot, wants us to bend over backwards to appease these anti-White invaders in our country, basically. Unwelcome guests. So you know fuck him!

 

Blair Cottrell: We’ve just breached the two hour mark and we don’t, …

 

Joel Davis: And also I will say this, he’ll call me out, he’ll talk shit publicly to my name publicly, right? Then Mark Collett, who’s a mutual friend of both of ours, says:

 

“Why don’t you guys do a debate? Why don’t you debate these two positions and work out who’s right or who’s wrong?”

 

And then he can’t even show up to a debate. Where’s the integrity? If you’re going to talk shit, let’s fucking debate!

 

Blair Cottrell: Was Mark going to mediate the debate?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah.

 

[1:59:37]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: The eternal, the eternal Libra. Keep everything fair. Look, I think the reason there seems to be more infighting on the Right sometimes or in nationalism is because there’s just bigger and more interesting personalities in nationalism. An individual personality is not discouraged like it is in communist circles. I think there’s just as much infighting in like far-Left groups. This is kept under wraps and they effectively bully each other into silence.

 

Whereas it’s harder to bully people on the Right because they’re kind of used to bullying and they’re used to standing up to it and maintaining their position in the face of it. There’s less infighting than there used to be. I can say that 10 years ago infighting on the Right was much worse. And you guys know me, I don’t really go for the whole Left, Right, political spectrum paradigm thing. I’m just using these terminologies because they mean something to you in order to be understood. A lot of Superchats, guys. And we’ve just breached, as I was saying, the two hour mark.

 

I hope the debate between Joel and is it Eric Striker? Eric Striker does happen, because I want to see Joel. I love to see Joel in a debate with someone who really doesn’t like him, because that’s where Joel shines, in my opinion. It’s very entertaining, so I hope it happens.

 

Joel Davis: There is a debate that I’m trying to line up at the moment with someone here in Australia who I think is, like a conservative, which is the kind I should be debating. I shouldn’t have to fucking debate people on my own fucking side, or supposedly on my own side.

 

Blair Cottrell: At least people on your side will debate you because people on the other side don’t want to debate. They just want to, …

 

Joel Davis: Apparently, he’s on my side. He talks shit about me and he won’t even fucking debate me. I mean, it’s just pathetic! But he’s a little faggot! Like fuck him!

 

How’s It Going says:

 

“Hail NSN. Hail Tom Sewell. Hail Joel Davis. Hail Blair Cottrell. Hail Black Magic SS. Hail Victory!”

 

Black Magic SS is a band.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay. I wasn’t sure what that was.

 

Joel Davis: Nate Oz says:

 

“Thoughts on Sam from the Two Worlds Collide podcast making videos, talking about Sewell and shit talking about the NSN and saying his sources from the army claimed he was a coward and a fraud when he was serving.”

 

Yeah, well, that’s garbage! Two Worlds Collide, he’s part of a collective of influences that obviously is connected to the conservative establishment. And he was told to attack us because they tried to hijack Aug 31. They failed in doing so, and so now we’re, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you fill me on that? Who’s Two Worlds Collide Podcasts? And how does he know about Tom’s army service?

 

Joel Davis: He doesn’t know. Because he used to serve in the ADF.

 

Now, Tom, he was an infantryman. He wanted to go to Afghanistan at the time, or he was supposed to be deployed to Afghanistan a few times, and his whole, like, unit or company or whatever, the tour got cancelled and delayed. And then Tom, he’s told the story of the reasons why he left the army.

 

But the reason why he left the army was because of personal disputes he had with people. There was a idea that he’s a coward because he was sitting there waiting to go to Afghanistan, and then they cancelled the trip. It doesn’t really make any sense. He was ready to go. You know, Tom, he likes to have a fight. Obviously, Tom was depressed! There was, I think, two people that were in his unit that killed themselves because they cancelled the tour, because they were just so hyped to go and so depressed when they couldn’t go. People don’t join the infantry because they’re afraid of fighting. Like, you can join them [words unclear]

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what I want to say. It’s antithetical to the truth! If there’s two things that Tom is not. It’s cowardly and fraudulent. That guy wears his heart on his sleeve. [chuckling] He does not tell lies! What he believes is written all over. He openly admits it, and he’s certainly not a coward! This guy will fight for what he believes and for his friends.

 

Joel Davis: Anyway, Two Worlds Collide if you think Tom is such a coward, when he gets out of jail, why don’t you fucking get in the ring with him?

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, yeah, it’s pretty, … I think when you sit on a podcast and you call somebody else a coward and a fraud while they’re in prison after standing up for what they believe doesn’t that make you the coward?

 

Joel Davis: Well, to be fair, he. I think he made the video before August 31st. He was reacting to Tom’s speech at nationals. But nevertheless, if you think he’s a coward when don’t you get in the ring with him.

 

Blair Cottrell: Does he get an audience, this Two Worlds Collides guy?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, he gets some views on Instagram.

 

But anyway, it was just a really retarded video. Like, his criticism of National Socialism was the that Hitler was on drugs and that he got the army to take drugs. You know, every army takes drugs. I thought you were in the army? Like, what are you talking about? And that’s the criticism. Like, you didn’t even bring up the “Holocaust” or some bullshit! He was just like:

 

“Hitler was on drugs. He’s a bad guy!”

 

[2:04:48]

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, the entire political apparatus in Australia is on all sorts of drugs for their mental health, anxiety disorders. Does that make them an equally bad government? Well, it makes them much worse of a government than Hitler’s government, in my opinion. [chuckling]

 

But, yeah, we won’t get into that. Let’s move on to the next. I don’t really care.

 

Joel Davis: Bitch666 said:

 

“Striker has soft hands.”

 

Presumably you’ve maybe met Striker in real life. He does seem like a fat little bitch to me. How’s It Going says:

 

“Joel and Blair, you’re both an inspiration to the entire White world. Could Australia be a stronghold for the White race? How do you feel about Whites immigrating there to consolidate?”

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s how it started.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I do believe that that’s what we’re fighting for. And I support White immigration of course, if you want to move to Australia and you want to come join the movement and you’re a White guy from overseas, you’re more than welcome to. Or girl. Especially if you’re a White girl from overseas, I think you’re even more welcome. Nate Oz said:

 

“Hey, Joel, did you see Paul Miller, Gypsy Crusader, talk about you and Tom on Jake Shield’s podcast? Would you ever have Paul on a podcast?”

 

I didn’t see that, but from what I’ve seen, I have seen him on Twitter saying positive things about us and I do appreciate that. I’ve never spoken to him before, but if he would like to do some kind of collaboration. Yeah, I’d be down. Of course. It could be fun. Do you know who Gypsy Crusader is, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: Is he the guy with the kind of long hair that makes the, … What’s that, …

 

Joel Davis: He’s really famous for, like the Omegle videos where he’s like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Omegle. Yeah. Even though at first I used to think it was kind of just like vulgar shock value entertainment, I’ve seen the guy actually represent what he believes in and he’s fairly articulate. And so, yeah, I actually think he’s all right. I don’t know enough about the guy. You guys know me. I don’t know much about anyone. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I haven’t seen a huge amount of his content, but from, I mean, he seemed like he’s entertaining. And like you said, when he’s getting serious, seems to be pretty cozy.

 

Blair Cottrell: I can say this, he’s very American. He’s like, he’s very American. And by that I mean he’s got a certain bravado about him that us Australians don’t really have. We’re kind of a bit more cynical, sceptical down here. We’re not so willing to put ourselves out there all the time. And if we do, we do it in a way that’s like. We still somewhat reserved, but he’s just like he’s going hard. And I don’t know, like I think he’s good value. Is that his real name, is it Paul? I’m not sure.

 

Joel Davis: Paul Miller is his real name apparently.

 

But yeah, if he would like to do a podcast, of course. Peter Sims, 1488 says:

 

“Free Thomas Sewell! He didn’t do nothing!”

 

Ain’t that true? Oh, we gotta get you going on this Blair. Aussie Order 88 said:

 

“Based Blair calling everything gay lately. Hope your gift shopping went well.”

 

There was a Blair ranting about gift shopping. Let’s reprise this take because I think it’s quite a funny take.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I think it was just yesterday I was spending some time in shopping centre looking for a present. Present was for a good friend’s son. Now his son was having his first birthday so he’s still just a baby. And I’m walking around thinking:

 

“What do you buy a one year old baby?”

 

I feel like anything I buy the baby, like let’s say I wrap up a present, the baby’s probably just going to play with the wrappings more than the present that I get for him. He’s not going to understand the value of any gift. And then I’m starting to think like I can’t even think about what would make a baby happy. Then I realised I’ve been in this situation many times before! I can’t even think about what would make any individual happy because I’m never thinking about that. I’m thinking about community issues and the country [chuckling] and what’s coming in the future for the entire community and country. Like how satisfied one person is about getting a present. It’s only momentary satisfaction too that wears off in about 30 seconds. It’s like, why would I invest any time into thinking about that?

 

And I realised how annoying buying gifts is and how gay it is if you’re a man trying to buy a present for someone, even if it’s for your own girlfriend. It’s just like you can’t get into that small mindset where suddenly instead of thinking about what matters, you’re just thinking about the temporary 30 second long satisfaction and experience of happiness that you’re going to create for one individual. Like why would anyone care about that? I don’t know! It’s just I find gift buying really annoying [sp] and it puts it into perspective. It puts something into perspective for you too, doesn’t it? It makes you realise that that same female perspective, that crushed down, shrunken perspective about the individual’s happiness is one of the problems that we have at government level, isn’t it? Because all of these women are too concerned with how an individual immigrant might feel satisfied or personally happy with the fact they’re coming into Australia. And that makes the woman feel good about herself providing that kind of lifestyle to individuals.

 

And so that’s all that really matters. So long as the female government bureaucrats feel like good people for helping out individuals and making them momentarily happy. That basically seems to be the extent of our government’s thought process. And that needs to stop! Doesn’t it?

 

[2:10:25]

 

So I don’t know. That’s the whole experience that I had yesterday. But I chose a present for my mate’s one year old son. I got a bucket of, what did I get, a bucket of like little blocks that stuck on top of each other and you can make little structures out of them. So he can make bridges and you can make little houses and stuff. Because I don’t trust any books, children’s books these days. I’ve heard some horror stories about children’s books, so I didn’t want to risk that. And I thought he can do something physical, he can make little bridges! So hopefully he gets some enjoyment out of that.

 

But like I said, it was difficult to even, to even think about it. But hey, I’m glad you guys enjoyed the rant. I had [chuckling] a fair few people laugh at that. So no, it wasn’t Lego, it wasn’t Lego. It was little timber blocks, different colours. And it’s perfect for a little one year old who’s trying to work out shapes and fittings and stuff like that.

 

And actually it was recommended to me by a few people. So I didn’t really decide myself. Someone had to help me out of that problem. But it is interesting, isn’t it, how, I’m sort of just reiterating the point I made that all men do actually have a problem with thinking on in short term and small matters like that. But when it comes to taking care of another individual person, women are just better at it. Women are more geared for that than men are. And it’s almost cruel to expect that of a man. To expect a man to go out there and think of some miraculous, incredible gift or series of presents, to expect him to buy that, to like conceptualise of that and buy it for someone. It’s like you’re asking him to basically be a woman. You’re asking him to be gay! [chuckling]

 

So I think I’d like to see a culture where women handle the gift buying and men don’t really have to think about it.

 

Joel Davis: That’s basically what I do. I just kind of consult the woman on gifts, mostly when they’re for women and children. Like, if I was trying to buy you a gift, for example, would be slightly easier because I could just think about what’s some shit that I would like that you would also like or something. And I could probably think of something.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but the thing is, if I’m gonna get someone a present that I would like, I’d get them I don’t know, something practical, like dishwashing detergent. Some, like, scrubbing brushes.

 

Joel Davis: Laundry detergent? Is that what I’m getting for fucking Christmas this year from you? Is it?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, it’s expensive stuff, man! Have you seen, like, good dishwashing detergent that doesn’t, like, wreck your dishes and stuff? It’s like, …

 

I would love to get that as a gift. If I opened up and if I put up a present and it was dishwashing detergent and a new, like, bucket and a mop, I’d be like:

 

“Great! Fantastic! I need this. I’m going to use this!”

 

Whereas if I get, like I don’t know, … What’s a present that a woman would buy you? Like, I don’t even know, man! I just want something that I can use is what I’m saying. If I’m gonna get a gift, I prefer not to get gifts, actually. It makes me feel awkward. I don’t want to be, … Because you know what? You know how people give you gifts? You know how people give you a present, and then they’re staring at you to see how you react?

 

Joel Davis: You’ve got to pretend like it’s awesome and shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: And you gotta act like you’re really happy about.

 

Joel Davis: Even if you get something that you like, you just kind of think about in your head. You don’t have a reaction. And then you got to be like:

 

“Oh!”

 

I don’t usually make a reaction. And then they kind of I notice that they look, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you guys imagine Joel getting a present? Like, even a present that he kind of likes? Can you imagine his reaction? Imagine the disappointment of Joel’s mother growing up, trying to make him happy with presents. He would have opened up every present on Christmas and just been like, … No, man, like, it’s annoying. You know how girls, like, meet each other on the street and they’re like:

 

“Oh, my God! I love you! You’re amazing!”

 

And it’s all an act. It’s all a fucking act! Like, when I see my friends on the street, I’m like:

 

“What’s going on?”

 

You know, it’s not that exciting just to see your friend on the street.

 

But you know what else is funny? After the girls put on that big fuss after seeing each other in public, they walk away bitching about each other, don’t they?:

 

“That fucking skank! I hate that bitch!”

 

Right? But then the men will insult each other to their faces. That’s like their way of greeting each other.

 

But then we’ll walk away thinking:

 

“Man, I love that guy. He’s a sick cunt!”

 

[chuckling] So it’s just this completely inverted reality that men and women exist in. It’s really interesting to explore. I find it interesting anyway.

 

[2:15:05]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

But in summary, like, I just prefer to have an arrangement where it’s like, I don’t need to get you shit, you don’t need to get me shit, and I just get my own stuff, you know, personally. Yeah. When it comes to gifts I’m not great. You gotta try and get something. But that’s when I basically consult the woman. What are we getting the kid? You know?

 

Blair Cottrell: But someone’s saying I’m ungrateful. I’m definitely not ungrateful. Like when I ruptured my pec tendon, people sent me gifts, and it was really helpful. Collagen, supplements. I got a lot of help from people from that, and that was fantastic because that’s stuff I actually needed. Right. I was injured. But I mean when someone’s trying to give you a gift actually just to make themselves feel good because they want to see you get excited. And then if you don’t get excited, you’re letting the person down. And then they’re just like:

 

“Oh, you’re a prick!”

 

That’s not real gift giving. That’s just you being selfish. That’s like you just trying to spend some money and hand someone some bullshit and see their reaction so you can feel good about yourself. I don’t know. I’m not against giving gifts. I don’t really know how to finish this.

 

The way I’ll wrap it up is my family were farmers. Yeah. The Cottrells. Dairy farmers for generations in Australia. They’re cold, hard working people. I don’t know where my passion came from. Probably from my mother’s side. The rest of my family are just very rigid, cold people. And every birthday party they ever hosted, they always said on the invitation, “no presents please”. Because they were just like practical people. I think the reason my dad’s side of the family never wanted to receive presents is because they never wanted to give them either. And if you’ve received presents, then you’re later obliged to give presents as well. You know what I mean?

 

So we’re a “no present” kind of family. My family, the Cottrells.

 

Joel Davis: I guess we should probably wrap this subject up. What else we got here? Anything? Peter Sims sent $1 to:

 

“Go get yourself some dishwashing detergent.”

 

How much fucking dishwashing detergent are we gonna buy with a dollar? Are you a fucking cheap cunt?

 

Come on, you know. $1 worth of dishwashing detergent, please. Let me get like a little, …

 

Blair Cottrell: One of [chuckling] those novelty ones.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, jewish.

 

Blair Cottrell: Megawatts 80 sent through $2 saying:

 

“Superchats make the show go longer.”

 

Well, stop sending them, guys. Because I want to go. I want to go to the gym.

 

Joel Davis: If you send a Superchat now, fuck you! I’m not reading it. We are done! The show is over. Hail victory! Blood and honour! White power!

 

Blair Cottrell: He says as he clings, he says as he clings for that last Superchat, which comes through from Lion Cross. $50. He says:

 

“Right. Every cunt get Blair a scrubbing brush for Christmas!”

 

Do it, guys. I like to clean my house. I like a clean environment. And so if I’m getting gifts, I want it to be cleaning products. [chuckling] I’m a practical man.

 

 

All right, guys, good show. Thanks for joining us. Love your work. Thanks for the donations. We’ll see you guys when we see you, I guess. Keep you updated on the next show.

 

[2:18:18]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 9/22/2025 = 79)

[Latest at the top]

jsmith980234
4 hours ago
I’d like to see Joel and Striker debate. I follow and like both, but I do NOT understand the antipathy Striker seems to have toward the Australian NSN in general. American political dissidents seem to have a harder time getting their egos out of the way for the sake of building a movement, which is probably one reason why there is no real movement to speak of in America. That and the fact that the jew-occupied government has been waging war against right wing organizers for decades (another case of liberal democracy taking the absurd position of having to destroy democracy in order to allegedly save democracy). Those who want to be leaders need to step up the game and act like men capable of rational discourse. They don’t have to like each other, but they don’t have to snipe at each other either. Side note, I think Blair may have the beginnings of a stand up comedy act talking about the difference between men and women. Fucking funny.
1 likes

Report
Oz74
1 day ago
I think Charlie Kirk was a greater man than prophet Muhammad… I’ve watched all Charlie’s videos since about 2015-16…The leftist always turn to violence and avoid any discussion that doesn’t go along with their world views..The posts mocking Charlie Kirks death are sickening..I can’t believe people are that evil..
2 likes

Report
bobbytimms
1 day ago
Free sewell!
1 like

Report
RevolutionaryFrog
1 day ago
It’s time for you guys to get some intro music / clips. These videos just make it hard to watch sometimes with the dryness.
-2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
jsmith980234
4 hours ago
I’ll take things that don’t fucking matter for $500, Alex.
0 likes

Report
Cabalsuck
3 days ago
Please watch Kirk is a psyop, https://rumble.com/v6ysuki-dont-be-fooled-they-killed-the-character-charlie-kirk-but-the-actors-still-.html
0 likes

Report
Cabalsuck
3 days ago
Please I beg you stop buying into these “behavior modification “ psyops,like (((Fink))) from Blackrock said ..they will force behaviors https://rumble.com/v6z1iy2-warning-if-you-cheer-charlie-kirks-death-youre-a-domestic-terrorist-and-wil.html
0 likes

Report
GlobalMan
Verified
3 days ago
Hi Joel, just watching you on Jake Shields show. You might want to watch this video and read the transcript. I have been leading the effort to remove the Australian government since 2008. Court room video: https://peternolan.com/likes/CourtRoomVideo Court room transcript: https://peternolan.com/likes/CourtRoomTranscript
0 likes

Report
Lueger
3 days ago
1:49:55 Striker should tone down his absurd love of mohammedans and spend his time learning German. Hitler’s view on the Palestinians limited itself to pointing out the hypocrisy of jewish-administered Britain and the jew colony. Hitler spoke positively having some openness to violence in one’s ethics, like the mohammedan savages have, but he was not an advocate of Arabs other than that everyone should be separate and held to the same standard (to which no semite holds himself).
0 likes

Report
Lueger
3 days ago
1:23:20 is there a jury trial for such charges in Oz, or is it decided by a judge alone?
0 likes

Report
RadicalAIAgenda
3 days ago
6 moths to 3 years, can’t go wrong with a few kg of Kinetic Sand. 2 year old, big bag of Mega Blocks. You can get them second hand. 3 year old, Leap Frog tablet computer. Simply look up the development miles stones for the age group, and get a toy that promotes the practice of those skills. Women are not very good at doing this. Dads are the ones that buy the presents that challenge the kids, which the kids find highly engaging.
0 likes

Report
PhooeyPhoxide
4 days ago
The passport bros are breeding a new race in Asia. This Wasian race could serve as both information reconnaissance, and the foraging of alliances with other ethno-nationalist movements.
-1 like

Report
Seppl88
4 days ago
Communism is Jewish!
2 likes

Report
ForRealers
5 days ago
Yess!!! Please try and get Gypsy Crusader on the show – that would be epic!!
1 like

Report
ProvingNihil
5 days ago
Oh my goodness please have Gypsy on! That guy is best!
1 like

Report
lengiles
5 days ago
Given that Kirk was starting to revise his position on Israel, I can’t help suspecting some form of Mossad involvement in his shooting. It wouldn’t be the first time they manipulated a deranged amateur into doing their dirty work for them. Also, the notable silence you mentioned from the conservative establishment, the lack of calls for Antifa to be banned. Makes me wonder if their puppet-masters advised them to leave Antifa alone.
0 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
radi8wl
5 days ago
When people say things like ‘he was afraid ‘israel’ was going to kill him’ her meant jews but everyone is afraid to say jews so they use words like: antifa, communist, left, israel, Bolshevik, Illuminati, bankers etc. I thought you knew this stuff, but then you follow up that remark by saying it could be mossad but you’re sticking with antifa. THEY’RE THE SAME THING JOEL, JEWS FFS. If your censoring yourself then please admit it in the beginning so you don’t lead Whites astray and you’re a shitty Nazi fwiw. Hitler won bc he named the jew and they couldn’t hide, his problem was allowing 25‰’ers into nsdap, anyway I hope that’s all it is, otherwise I’m sensing some higher level neurolinguistic programming, I hope not but it would explain baphomet. Sorry but no normal people see a white baby eating tranny ‘god’ and want it forever tattooed on their beautiful White skin. It’s not edgy even to og ‘goth girls’ like me.
1 like

Report
radi8wl
5 days ago
C’mon Joel, are you really ignorant of the fact that antifa, ‘communist left’ (as if there’s a communist right) and israel all have 1 thing in common!? They’re jews run by criminal jew hq ‘israel’. If you think you’re ever going to find ‘evidence’ that mossad is guilty of anything you don’t understand the world we’re living in, and believing the ‘official story’ makes you sound gullible at best. Obv you’re trying to propagandize your followers towards antifa, but it’s jews pushing tranny, funding antifa and every other evil out there. The problem with you young WN is the jews have still infected ur brain with fear of ‘conspiracy theories’, conspiracies have been happening as soon as 3 humans existed, they happen every day. When someone calls you a conspiracy theorist it’s the same as calling you a racist or a nazi, you can substitute all those words with ‘SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP OR ELSE’. Otherwise we love Thomas Sewell wish he was in America, there’s no one else so far that understands the big picture. The practical and the metaphysical AND the conspiracies. You and Blair are doing your best for Tom and White’s so thanks for that, disclaimer: Blair is not part of any org (giggle) you know that’s not going to work I hope. May Jesus remove the veil from your eyes and protect you and bc he was the og ‘nazi’ fighting off the jews, while thor and odin were killing and raping other Whites. Baphomet is not a good look (speaking of antifa tranny jews and the gods they sacrifice White babies to). Hope you take that thoughtfully and with introspection. Much love from usa!
1 like

Report
katana17
5 days ago
[Joel Davis – The Only Solution to Antifascism is Fascism – Sep 14, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/09/15/joel-davis-the-only-solution-to-antifascism-is-fascism-sep-14-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss current events and the killing of Charlie Kirk. – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 23,564 – Duration: 138 mins]
0 likes

Delete
1488Brother
5 days ago
Hit the fucking like button ffs
1 like

Report
1488Brother
5 days ago
It pisses me off this has 12k+ views
and only 355 likes as of now…
0 likes

Report
Angelalee0
5 days ago
The two finger “salute” has 2 meanings. Palm facing inward is a is highly “offensive” fck u and the palm facing outward is ” peace or victory”.. Anyway great livestream as always. Love the substance and also, fck Antifa
0 likes

Report
jsmith980234
5 days ago
At this point, most of the governments of the West need to be declared terrorist organizations. It’s pretty terrible when you can’t even count on your own government to defend the rights of White people to exist. The cuckservatives and the kosher right in general will be swept into the dustbin of history. They should hope the sweeping is done by nazis who will simply push them to the side rather than the communists who will liquidate them and hose their remains off into the gutters of history.
1 like

Report
ProvingNihil
6 days ago
And I wasn’t a fan of Charlie Kirk, especially him shilling for Israel. He didn’t deserve to me publicly executed for having opposite political opinion’s, the left is severely insane that it’s getting scary..
2 likes

Report
ProvingNihil
6 days ago
I believe the feds are backing up Antifa, I know that’s a bit far-fetched.
3 likes

Report
PlebbitorDestroyer
VerifiedSupporter+
6 days ago
Striker will never be a real woman
0 likes

Report
MeineEhreheisstTreue
6 days ago
Your analysis is the 100% truth of this situation.
1 like

Report
beno668
6 days ago
I was just kicked from telegram chat and reported to moderators. Why are “fascist” moderators, who supposedly represent free speech channel, kicking allies such as myself?
3 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
chemicalfrogs001
6 days ago
anti ra is gh3y
1 like

Report
AmalekAvenger
6 days ago
Thomas has been moved to Melbourne Assessment Prison today. If you wish to write to him you can address the prison directly. Thomas Sewell Prisoner number: 226549 Melbourne Assessment Prison 317-353 Spencer Street West Melbourne VIC 3003 check
5 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
GlobalMan
Verified
3 days ago
What is the excuse for jailing him?
0 likes

Report
AmalekAvenger
6 days ago
donating for studio equipment and gear for you guise
3 likes

Report
Seppl88
6 days ago
The Left has always been intertwined with violence, the Bolsheviks, Red Uprisings during the 1920s, Red Army Faction the list goes on. Hitler formed the SA to counter Communist violence as the State was unable to prevent it. Democracy can’t handle the fact that these psychos cannot be reasoned with. I agree with you guys.
1 like

Report
Seppl88
6 days ago
If we had a just and stable Society then we would not National Socialism! It is the only Solution ,a true alternative to the Judeo-Ameriacan Empire, Liberal Democracy, Finance capital and Marxism.
1 like

Report
TVR_
6 days ago
Imagine gift giving in this economy
2 likes

Report
imSofaKingRayZest
6 days ago
advocating for groups to be listed as terror groups is a 0 sum game, remember the greek golden dawn was listed as 1 when a member “did” something wrong so they couldnt take power after winning the election, eu has said they will annul the german election if afd win. its also a double standard that if a lib or labour or greens member did something untoward their organisation would not be held collectively responsible.
3 likes

Report
akdjfhgpjksdnkjnsdfg
6 days ago
I never watched Kirk, but it is fun to see clips of him hysterically asserting that SODOMY is conservative. Nobody would say Bill Clinton had conservative values, he was almost sacked for adultery. Now Judaeo-“christian” zionists say Trump the womanizer, adulterer and kiddy-fiddler is conservative… Even so, come Lord Jesus.
0 likes

Report
imSofaKingRayZest
6 days ago
there is a kosher race going on to fill every white country with non white 3rd worlders because muh worker shortage, but in the next few years ai and robots will replace almost all workers, its almost like the jewbankers want a race war in all western countries and at the same time bring on ww3 while the western military is at its lowest point ever, allowing the west to lose and white amalek to be scrubbed from history once and for all. its ride or die time my fellow white folk.
1 like

Report
imSofaKingRayZest
6 days ago
jews use the white race as a surrogate for their sins so whites are blamed for their evil. national socialism is neither left or right, the whole left cheek, right cheek psy op with a kosher arsehole in the middle stick needs to end. kirk shooting shows how easy it is to shift folks that are pro freedom of speech into hate speech crusaders with “hurty words” against their dead “hero”. national socialists need to keep showing consistency in policy, something the kosher “right” lost while lining their pockets.
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
6 days ago
every year jews will hold a ritual where they “put” their sins into live chickens and then march in the streets swinging the live chickens by their heads until they die and dumping them into the street. seems to me us whites are the chickens.
0 likes

Report
WhiteWulfWodanaz
6 days ago
Good response on the Erik Striker issue. When I heard Thomas say “the Palestinians” I assumed he misspoke and meant to say “the pro-palestine protesters.” I thought that was pretty obvious p.s. it’s a little disappointing to hear that the NSN leans more pro-ukraine over pro-russia considering Ukraine is a puppet of ZOG NATO (assuming that even is the stance of NSN maybe it’s not) but nevertheless it’s wrong of Erik to disavow you over that. Very stupid and wrong. Even though I personally lean pro-russia I am ultimately fully against that war bcos it’s just Whites killing each other senselessly and even more ultimately than that I am Australia first so the dumbest thing NatSocs can do is break apart their national movements over international issues. Disappointing in Erik that he can’t see past personal petty differences
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
WhiteWulfWodanaz
6 days ago
I also acknowledge I can be completely misinformed about that war, maybe I should also lean pro-ukraine idk. nevertheless the idea that perspectives about events on the other side of the world should lead to breaking apart NatSocism movements is something I can’t back. White Unity is the number one priority. unlike the left, we can tolerate difference of opinion
1 like

Report
MisterXXXXX
1 week ago
moshe is a longwinded waffler
0 likes

Report
NotBabyHitler88
Supporter
1 week ago
I was promised Right Wing Death Squads
6 likes

Report
InReality33
1 week ago
Blair… stop countersignal concern posting Joel.
4 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
FLmetalhead
1 week ago
Totally Nice Day
5 likes

Report
FancypantsandMP5S
VerifiedSupporter+
1 week ago
Where the fuk is your black sheet
8 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
Novgarods
1 week ago
how is he a coward? It takes alot of nerve to do that. He’ll be going to prison for the rest of his life
0 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
Motion937
1 week ago
Charlie was not just saying words. He was articulating ideas that the left does not like & he was winning the arguments against them. The issue of “words” was never the point. The left was losing on their ideas. That is what they hate. Their bullshit worldview was crumbling. That is why they called it hateful. Gas lighting nonstop. Because they were losing in the battlefield of ideas. What comes next is something they will hate even more. It will be a cathartic experience for everyone that is sick of their shit.
10 likes

Report
Bigboy6669
1 week ago
Heil the nsn
6 likes

Report
ResistenciaNS
1 week ago
TND.
14 likes

Report
MeanBeanComedy
1 week ago
Let the missus get presents for your mates’ kids! Gift-giving is fun between friends, since you can use your knowledge about that person to show you understand him and care about him. You can also use experience in a certain field. For example, I get my friends books they don’t even know they want, and I’m going to be getting my father a crossbow this year because his shoulder is too hurt to use a compound bow now. I like giving gifts sometimes!
3 likes

Report
somedude39
1 week ago
If this week taught me anything, it’s that no demographic is more keen on political assassinations than the swifties.
2 likes

Report
Kroninn
SubSupporter
1 week ago
Charlie Kirk was wearing a soft panel in his vest. they only stop pistol rounds(He was anticipating someone from thw crowd woild shoot him). The 30-06 round hit him in the chest, went through the Kevlar, traveled up his spine and exited through his neck.
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
1488Brother
5 days ago
He had no armor. You can see his nipples through his shirt in multiple pictures and videos from the event.
0 likes

Report
Motion937
1 week ago
We cannot coexist with these people. There is no talking it out. That is what Charlie was trying to do.
30 likes

Report
Restlessdreams88
1 week ago
TND!
3 likes

Report
mickyrauz
1 week ago
5 adds in a row to watch this lol
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
henrybox
1 week ago
Do you have an adblock extension? I have Ublock origin lite
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
EbeneezerYE24
1 week ago
You could also just use the Brave browser with its built in adblock.
1 like

Report
Heimric
1 week ago
They don’t ban antifa because “antifascism” is a creation of the winners of WWII.
16 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
jsmith980234
5 days ago
the jews were doing the antifascist schtick in 1930s Germany before Hitler and WW2. it’s just another iteration of that. the don’t ban it because it’s jewish.
4 likes

Report
OsoyoosKid
6 days ago
And we know who J are…!
0 likes

Report
thorne91
Supporter+
1 week ago
We do need a strong man. Someone who has independent wealth, protection, and who has zero dirt that can be used against him. Someone impervious to Jews basically. Impervious to Jewish money and impervious to Jewish blackmail.
6 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
GigaChud7
1 week ago
Well there are plenty lol, how do you think PF and White Australia perform so well? The issue is with the precedent of Charlie Kirk being murdered, whether or whether not the state had him killed, no doubt it’s open season on out leaders and financial backers.
0 likes

Report
Heimric
1 week ago
I think we should replace the word ‘antifascism’ with stupidity. Can’t reason with stupids.
8 likes

Report
thorne91
Supporter+
1 week ago
Thank God here in America we have these couple of sentences, written on an obsolete piece of paper, that half the country despises…that’s what stands between our speech and these masses of rabid shitlibs. It was worth the head start on diversity. The right to bitch about it, and the right to be armed to the teeth. Depending if your state/county/city even recognizes constitutional rights. There are plenty which don’t. But I’d say…it’s a fair trade-off for the head start on diversity here in the states.
13 likes

Report
GrizzlyWhisker
1 week ago
I would love to send Tom an email while he’s in jail if it’s not a convoluted process that requires doxxing myself. I’m still not totally sure where to find the link but I’ll look around the Telegram.
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
AmalekAvenger
6 days ago
Thomas has been moved to Melbourne Assessment Prison today. If you wish to write to him you can address the prison directly. Thomas Sewell Prisoner number: 226549 Melbourne Assessment Prison 317-353 Spencer Street West Melbourne VIC 3003
2 likes

Report
Australian_Terra
1 week ago
The government already knows who you are.
1 like

Report
dcbyers13
1 week ago
Thank you both for your leadership. White Australia is quickly becoming the model for the rest of the white world.
47 likes

Report
katana17
1 week ago
[Joel Davis – Reflections on the March for Australia – Sep 7, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/09/08/joel-davis-reflections-on-the-march-for-australia-sep-7-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell reflect on the recent successful March for Australia in major cities that drew at least 100,000 people. Also Tom Sewell’s (NSN leader) arrest as a result of the clash with leftists and communists at the so-called “Camp Sovereign” abo squatter encampment in a nearby park, that was being used as staging ground for attacks on Aussie marchers. And more, … – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 18,272 – Duration: 114 mins]
3 likes

===================

 

Odyssee Comments

top

(Comments as of 9/22/2025 = 195)

HyperChat minimum:
$0.01
pius
11 hours ago
I’ve said this, whites need to get mean.

pius
13 hours ago
Fascism is seizing control of the state and pushing the left out of the political process . If it’s either your dictatorship or ours, if we’re going to have left wing authoritarianism or right wing authoritarianism, then we’re going to do the authoritarianism.
This just sounds like politics. I’m not sure why it even has to have the name fascism

Rebellious Goy
1 day ago
gift-giving
is an exercise in empathy. A heartfelt gift boils down to realizing what the other person would appreciate. narcissists have trouble with it. because they never really listen to what other people say (unless the topic is perceived as concerning their own interests)

danzimmons
3 days ago
Yes just like in the yookay, trying to save the children from porn lol as they pay the most degenerate homosexual tranni’s in kindergarten’s as well as their porno’s. Fuck those sellout anti White leaders

4
0
Green
5 days ago
Brilliant sarcasm by Blair at
10:00
.

4
0

@katana17
5 days ago
[Joel Davis – The Only Solution to Antifascism is Fascism – Sep 14, 2025 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – The Only Solution to Antifascism is Fascism – Sep 14, 2025 – Transcript

[In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss current events and the killing of Charlie Kirk.
– KATANA]
[TRANSCRIPT – Words: 23,564 – Duration: 138 mins]

elfoffgazza
5 days ago
Gypsy Crusader isn’t even White, he’s half Romani

2
0

@clintwayne
6 days ago
Eric Striker has nothing good to say about other ns groups, it time for him to grow up a realise the movement is far far bigger
than him and his over inflated ego.

4
0
King Tut
6 days ago(edited)
fuck Eric Striker, and Mike Jewnoch! they luv muslim cock. those 2 are THE most annoying guests on PWR show. Mike is the #1 reason why I could never get into TRS, and the entire NJP was very pro Islam. Warren Balough even bought Islamic merch of some muslim group that fight the Jews in the ME and promoted them on his show. but at least Warren is someone I can listen to and enjoy his inisights.
Mark is way too nice. it took him over 1 YEAR to depart with Jason Cohen. even after half his followers kept complaining about Jason, it took a huge scandal to kick Jason off the show cuz he flat out said we shouldn’t criticize or even mention Jews cuz it’s bad optics. and afterwards Jason TALKS SHIT ABOUT MARK ON HIS OWN SHOW!! this is after all the free promotions Mark gave Jason on PWR.

9
2
Hide replies
Rebellious Goy
1 day ago
Odysee’s Warstrike channel muted me hours after I commented that “striker” counter-signaling NSN was sus. I only watched for Warren’s stories anyway.

3
0

@Totenkopfelite
6 days ago
Hitlers Definition of Socialism
“A socialist is the one serves the common good without giving up his individuality or personality or the product of his personal efficiency. Our adopted term ‘socialist’ has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti property ; true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or individual effort, or efficiency ; true socialism values the individual and encourages him in individual efficiency at the same time holding that his interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of his community. All great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist. Both charges are false.” Adolf Hitler December 28th 1938.

12
0

@Totenkopfelite
6 days ago
Fascism was a movement to save Europe from communism. Though thanks to today’s media almost everyone thinks that fascism is something horrible.
Of Italian fascism Churchill said “Italy has shown that there is a way of fighting the subversive forces which can rally the masses of the people, properly led, to value and wish to defend the honour and stability of civilised society. Hereafter no great nation will be unprovided with an ultimate means of protection against the cancerous growth of Bolshevism.”
Fascism in short is a defender of the nation, culture and people.

7
0
Hide replies
Rebellious Goy
1 day ago
It was the European response to the Red Menace

Great Expectations
6 days ago
The are “violent communist terrorists” they are not “Anti-Fascist”

2
0
Hateful Yarn
6 days ago(edited)
33:00
yeah the narrative on reddit is that the shooter was a groyper or some alt light cuck. They’re not even talking about his trøøn boyfriend. No one is talking about that but us.

3
0
Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
o//

3
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
o/

4
0

@George_Luther_Wickstrom
7 days ago
o/

4
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
I am opposite I like to give presents but not receive them

5
0
Reginald Collett
7 days ago
Have you ever seen the paul hogan show?

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
A spade great gift

2
0
WayTruthLight
7 days ago
TheHolyNewTestament Word rebukes/ infuriates SatanicJeews more than anything else does, and there is nothing anyone can do about it. This isn’t rocket physics.

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
a mop

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
lol

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
Lego ?

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
Why does the Palestinians and all the Muslims go and fight the Jews in Israel for the sandpit

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
I have no problem with Palestinians and Muslims if they go back to their own countries and stay there

3
0

@George_Luther_Wickstrom
7 days ago
Warstrike is so gay. Getting drunk, smoking, & praising superchats.

5
2

@EverybodywakeUp
7 days ago
Ricky Hattons died.

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
Joel you are right o/

4
0
Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
What benefits WHITE people have we had being Pro Palestine over the years no support.

3
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@RobertE.Pyle
bye brother

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
NSN have done great

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
The BNP tried this joining up with Muslims and Palestine groups it doesn’t work they are Anti-white

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
seen gfro afar it didn’t look like there were vere many Arabs there

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
Free Tomas Sewell

14
0
WaffleStake
7 days ago
meanwhile don’t dare question Jewish history

2
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
HIT THAT FIRE BUTTON EVERYONE

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
Don’t let commie infiltrators take over the chat.

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
I’m gonna head out, y’all take it easy o/

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
free son of enos

ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@1690Sparky
that was even better

WaffleStake
7 days ago
Free Mr Bond

5
0
Hide replies
Alison Chains
4 days ago
how long has it been now

1
0
Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
https://x.com/indigenousbritt/status/1967025836730835219

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
when we win we’ll make video games with Jew zombies

@SorenX
7 days ago
thanks

WaffleStake
7 days ago

@SorenX
https://entropystream.live/mobile/joeldavis

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
I thought it was great brother I will put up another one o/

@SorenX
7 days ago

@WaffleStake
are you joking? i see no link to entropy in the details?

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
Nazi zombies would be cool, we could unleash them on antifa at one of their protest

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
lol

ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@1690Sparky
that was great , Avi is scum

2
0
WaffleStake
7 days ago

@SorenX
try the entropy link

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
get racist or go extinct

7
0

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
Indians are so disgusting

3
0

@SorenX
7 days ago

@joeldavis
is this on another tube site like rumble? odysee has a shitty bitcoin payment system i cant use

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago

@WaffleStake
you beat me 2 it

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
they are fringe and cringe

WaffleStake
7 days ago
fringe and cringe

Ethno Nationalist
7 days ago
https://x.com/indigenousbritt/status/1966933551787774236

SovereignSaint
7 days ago
shiiiiiit

WaffleStake
7 days ago
the Joel Jamal rally

2
0

@SorenX
7 days ago
adelaide is getting taken over by pajeets

2
0

@SorenX
7 days ago
europa the last battle opened my eyes heavily recommend!

6
0
Hide replies
Alison Chains
4 days ago
pretty sure everyone this side of the internet has seen it.

2
0

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago

@RobertE.Pyle
yep he’s a kike

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@43TH3R34L
NeoNazi? We don’t call it that, call it what it is, say the whole thing

WaffleStake
7 days ago
if you’re a cop you’re a public figure to some degree

2
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@43TH3R34L
How is he sucking off jews?

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
you are a jew commie

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
leftie shit

@43TH3R34L

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
you are the bitch

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
BAN 43TH3R34L

ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@43TH3R34L
go somewhere else

Euroic
7 days ago
But Joel, so are muslims.

2
0

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
they hate us cuz they anus

ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@Euroic
they will they hate each other more than they hate us

1
0

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
there we go Joel keep naming them

WaffleStake
7 days ago
Dave Lee was debating this non white immigrant this afternoon and pretty much she was a living example of the globohomo slave race and she couldn’t see it

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
I hope non-Whites do fight each other

3
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
who will fight each other

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
also there will be too many different groups

Euroic
7 days ago
Weimar Germany was not being flooded with millions of brown 3rd world subhumans. Our situation is far worse demographically.

10
0
WaffleStake
7 days ago
the slave race is the ultimate goal

5
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
a ponsy scheme

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
are Australians not able to say Jew anymore?

1
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
^^

Euroic
7 days ago
I wish Germany had won WW2

9
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
NS is against parasitism , parasitism from above (the financial system )

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
Leftists hate the White working class the most.

6
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
private property, but even the richest man or largest company are not more important than the nation

2
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
We have to limit the financial system

2
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
you need to understand what democracy is – its a ratcheting system. The left comes in, advances satanic jewish ideas, the right comes in and normalises it “gay marriage is conservative”. They do this over and over.

3
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
They both agree on open borders too

3
0
Euroic
7 days ago
They are basically on the same side. They are both anti-White.

1
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
true

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Euroic
Pretty much

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
Fuck conservatism, they sided with the communists in WW2

4
0
Hide replies
Alison Chains
4 days ago
conservatism is dead. with the death of charlie kirk, hopefully more people realize how useless it is. time for something else.

2
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
yes its really that simple. The “right” that win elections are likewise comprimised

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
conservatives are lefties

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
There ultimate goal is total White extinction. If you want to survive become a racial nationalist. Be racist or go extinct.

3
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
He won’t do it because all of his grandchildren are jewish

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
Yes

scoobyburn
7 days ago
O/ :illuminati_2: separation

1
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Euroic
That’s what they do when you become a liability to them, they hate all gentiles even if you bow down to them, they’ll still kill you if you step out of line just a little bit

3
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
Some of the left say killing this man now is like killing hitler in 1932. That is where their minds are. How often have you heard that “if you had a time machine whats the first thing you would do?” – they always say go back in time to kill baby hitler. This is who they are

2
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
resistance is coming

3
0
Euroic
7 days ago
Kirk sucked Israel’s dick and still got shot.

4
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
Who cares who did it, who benefits from it – lets make it us.

Euroic
7 days ago
The mainstream media told her its safe to be around niggers.

3
0

@Evola19
7 days ago

@TheBuckBreaker
This is exactly it. One of my modules was on the gender pay gap. The amount of jewish authors I had to reference was unbelievable.

Minister of Memes
7 days ago
They even had a module of anti-white abo propaganda in my Diploma of Accounting at TAFE. The vaguely named class was called “making decisions in a legal context”.

@Evola19
7 days ago
Young people also want to conform and in such a place they inevitably come out believing these dysgenic ideas

@Evola19
7 days ago
yes I have studied in higher education and this was my experience. Ideological brainwashing. Soviets used to make dissidents in the camps write pro-soviet works as a way to self brainwash, that is what universities do today. The kids brainwash themselves doing the work

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
Hail Hitler o/

2
0

@Evola19
7 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
yes that is true, “left” is too broad a term really

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
You guys better be carful talking shit about antifa and calling them terrorist, Striker and the TRS gang might call you whitetoids and sic their Arab donors on you guys

2
1
ThinRedLine
7 days ago

@Evola19
I think there are degrees of leftism ,this extreme maybe 5-10 % but some kind of leftie maybe 30 -40%

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
Leftists and mudsharks

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
suicidal empathy is part of our make up

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
lots

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
How many whites are left wing? How bad is it as a percentage

Euroic
7 days ago
Self-hating white leftist scum

1
0
ThinRedLine
7 days ago
I heard the shooter had a tranny GF

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
true

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
The life of one insect has more value than the lives of all left-wingers on earth combined.

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
The main issue is the right taking money from Israel and being pro-Israel.

ThinRedLine
7 days ago
They would kill us

1
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Evola19
Most likely

@Evola19
7 days ago
It just supresses them for a few years

@Evola19
7 days ago
They can list it as a terrorist organisation but another will be made called something else

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@WaffleStake
Even if that was true that was never going to happen

@Evola19
7 days ago

@RobertE.Pyle
Indeed

Euroic
7 days ago
Cuckservatives

1
0
WaffleStake
7 days ago
back in the day, Obama was contemplating listing antifa as a terrorist organisation iirc

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Evola19
Same with Charlie Kirk being assassinated, we know damn well Israel did it

1
0

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
antifa Jews same shit

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
The Kosha Right

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
Everyone knows 9/11 was Israel. Who benefits is the only question you need to ask.

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
Nothing proves that jews did 9/11 other then dancing Israelis but we still blame Israel

Euroic
7 days ago
Antifa are terrorists but they won’t be outlawed because the serve the regime.

1
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
The far left is a tool of Israel, anything they do is in the interest of Israel

1
0
Euroic
7 days ago
Leftists are the ideological slaves of the regime. antifa want whatever their globalist masters tell them to want.

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
When rittenhouse shot “Antifa” how many were jewish Joel

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
I blame Israel and the far left

@Evola19
7 days ago
There is a lot of evidence are you not looking

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
Israel itself is the global capital of pedophilia, tel aviv is the gayest city on earth, Isreal is the main manufacturer of hormone drugs for transgenderism – Israel is the literal throne of Satan on this earth.

1
0

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
Don’t send your kids to school

@Evola19
7 days ago
feminism, multi-culturalism, transgenderism, homosexuality – all pushed by jews

1
0

@Evola19
7 days ago
The left are so extreme and genocidal because they are led by jews. Everything left wing from female voting to civil rights is purely jewish led

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
o/

@Evola19
7 days ago
By deception we shall do war

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Evola19
Soon as it happened the first thing Netanyahu said was “Israel didn’t do this”

@Evola19
7 days ago
Netanyahu tweeted “He was murdered for speaking the truth”, yeah no shit.

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago

@Evola19
Yep

@Evola19
7 days ago
Kirk was getting off script

@RobertE.Pyle
7 days ago
o/

@Evola19
7 days ago
The jewish guy arrested shouting “shoot me” then being released later and Netanyahu tweeting within minutes of the kill tells you who did it.

WaffleStake
7 days ago
Edward Dutton is right about these people

@Evola19
7 days ago
He was not one of ours

@Evola19
7 days ago
I had never heard about this guy until he was shot. That is why I have not fallen for the propaganda that “he was one of us” just because he had 2 blonde children, white skin and a wife. He was a traitor to his people. He was coming round sure, but he spent years shilling for jews and punching right

@Evola19
7 days ago
lol

@Evola19
7 days ago
This is why you dont make deals with the devil

@Evola19
7 days ago
The wages of sin are death. If you take money from jews to shill for Israel then start turning on them this is your reward

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
r

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
e

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
g

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
g

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
i

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
N

@Argo
7 days ago
tnd

@Argo
7 days ago
you’re on

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
now it is

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
7 days ago
it’s not letting me watch

0
0
==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live another episode of the show. It is the 11th of July, 2025, and there’s a lot to discuss. It’s been somewhat interesting week in developments. There’s some issues to break down, some happenings to dissect, and we’ve got Blair back. So how you feeling this evening?

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay. I was just sending you something, actually, something that might be worth talking about later, but I’ve been a little bit sick. I was a bit sick last week and I have some, I don’t know, residual infection of some kind. It’s not that bad, but it feels like it’s inside my face somewhere. And I’ve got like swollen lymph nodes. Does anyone else get that? It’s like a node underneath your ear here somewhere and I can feel it pushing against a nerve in my tooth, so that’s not so pleasant, but I’m otherwise fine.

 

Well, that’s not true, actually. I sustained a slight injury in the gym on Monday, training for the weightlifting competition that’s coming up. I slightly tore my pec again, but only very slight. I got a scan at a radiology clinic yesterday and even though the woman who did the scan isn’t qualified to make any assessments, it was her opinion that my tendon was completely attached still. And it does seem that way because there’s no visible difference, there’s no bruising, but it’s quite painful and I’m currently not really able to do a push up. [chuckling] So that’s not good news, being only a few weeks out from the actual date of the competition.

 

But look, I’ve made pretty miraculous recoveries before, so I’m stealing with a chance here. I’m not going to let anyone down completely. I can still deadlift very heavy and squat, pretty heavy. And I only need my numbers on the bench press to be reasonable in order to stay in the game.

 

But it was kind of annoying. I spoke to Joel on the phone about this earlier in the week. What I’m most annoyed about isn’t that the injury happened. It’s that about a week before I got injured, I was lifting more than I was when I got injured.

 

So I’m not really sure how to interpret that. And I feel like I warmed up properly, I rested properly, I might not have been hydrated enough. That might have been it. And I may have changed my grip slightly. It’s like little things like that when you’re lifting quite heavy that can lead to injuries, so there’s that.

 

So I’ve got a slight infection Inside my face somewhere and I’ve got a slightly torn peck again. I’ve seen better days, guys but I’m feeling fine. It hasn’t got me down.

 

What I was thinking about this morning and yesterday to some extent I was thinking about how much sweeter women were before the Internet. Do you remember that, Joel? Like girls.

 

Joel Davis: Huh?

 

Blair Cottrell: What was that?

 

Joel Davis: I’m not old enough to remember that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Really? What, you’re only what, 29, 30?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but even still, I remember everyone was on social media when I was in high school, so.

 

Blair Cottrell: Interesting! You see, I remember a time before social media. I remember when social media kind of started with MySpace. And it wasn’t so bad then because that was before a time where you could access social media through a screen in your pocket. With MySpace you had to actually sit at your computer. So it was like of secondary importance. Like real life human interaction was still of primer the primary way that you interacted with other people.

 

And I can recall how much sweeter girls used to be. Like you used to sit next to in high school, you’d sit next to a girl and talk to her and she was blown away. She was so happy that you were talking to her. You were possibly the only guy that spoke to her in a period of six months. And it’s like these days women don’t have a good grasp on their limited value. Social media has made women feel like they’re a lot more valuable than they are. Even average looking girls are getting a shitload of attention on platforms like Instagram.

 

And so when you talk to a girl now, this is just like not saying I’m out there trying to talk to girls, right? It’s not like a frustration I’ve got or something. It was just like a nostalgic feeling I had over the past couple of days. I remember how much different girls used to be before the Internet. Like pre-Internet, women were superior to modern day women because they didn’t have a big head. They didn’t all feel like they were Victoria’s Secret models with their own little, you know, fashion magazine page on Instagram.

 

And I also noticed. I’ll get your take on this too. I don’t know if you’d agree with this.

 

Joel Davis: I can’t give a take on what you just said. We have to blow past the take?

 

Blair Cottrell: But I noticed that women are like stressed and angry when you see them in public. They’ve got this look on their face like it’s an angry look on their face. Like they’re men or something. You know how guys walk around with a frown, like a male ego? Women have that now as well.

 

Now, that’s probably for a multitude of reasons. It’s probably because women are expected to make money and compete in industries previously relevant only to men.

 

But I also think it’s because there’s a lot of pressure on women to maintain the image they’ve created on social media because they look really pretty on their Instagram pages with their special pictures taken on the perfect angle to make their waist look small and their bust look big and that kind of thing.

 

But then they go out into the real world and people are seeing them for the way they really look, and that’s a little bit stressful for them. There’s a lot riding on the reputation that they’ve created in the virtual realm to continue to look as beautiful as that.

 

[05:54]

 

So I’ve just been thinking about this, and I’ve been forced to conclude that I think social media should be banned, especially for women. I think women just shouldn’t be allowed on social media because they turn it into a prostitution racket. And it’s just bad for their psychology generally. I don’t think it’s necessarily good for men either, because actually men just end up simping after women and feeding into the problem, don’t they?

 

What do you think, Joel? Joel, do you think we could have an Internet without social media, where the Internet could be used just for financial fluidity, making buying and selling easier? Maybe for business to some degree, but not for personal social reasons that should just be blanket banned? I can think of a lot of, …

 

Joel Davis: Like, how do you stop people from socializing?

 

Blair Cottrell: Just ban social media. Like ban block all social media. Countries like North Korea and China do this.

 

Joel Davis: They block certain social media sites, but then they have their own, … Social media is just socializing on the Internet, really. Like, if you think about it.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s more than that. When you give a voice, when you allow every idiot an opinion, it turns into a lot of bullshit noise!

 

Joel Davis: Well, I thought about this. Like, imagine if imagine if Twitter forced you to take an IQ test and you had to score like 115 plus to have an account that could actually post anything. Imagine how much better it would be.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a start.

 

Joel Davis: But what you’re saying, Blair, is the government is trying to ban, I think, everyone under the age of 16 from social media. What you want to do is you want to instead women.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, absolutely! I want to start with that. I eventually want to phase social media out altogether. I just think it’s been terrible for human social interaction. It’s overexposed people to way too many different identities and faces. It’s created unrealistic expectations. Do you know how exhausting it is even when you’re on your lunch break from work to be scrolling social media and still trying to take in another hundred new faces? Like, do you know how many faces I have in my memory? That of people I don’t know, I didn’t even know their names. And overloaded in my brain are images of people’s faces, people on screens trying to sell me shit! I don’t want their faces in my fucking memory.

 

I don’t think we’re designed to see so many different human faces. We’re only designed to know a certain amount of people. And before the Internet, you only knew people in your certain or specific region, in your suburb, they were familiar. Even the people in the next suburb were weird! The way they talked, their mannerisms, they were weird, man! Only people in your area made sense. Only they were familiar. And I found myself not really feeling socially exhausted before the Internet, but now I just don’t want to talk to anyone ever!

 

Now, once I’m done with work, it’s like, fucking leave me alone! And it’s got something to do with overexposure to too much socialisation, to too many faces, to too many bullshit personalities and the hype that they’re trying to create through the screens. And that’s what happens when you give everyone access to everything all of the time. And that’s what it is, isn’t it? Social media, it’s everything and everyone all of the time. And I don’t think we’re geared for that as human beings, individuals. I think its way too much.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I definitely agree with you that it’s doing incredible damage to our psyche, because it’s clearly completely unnatural. And it is producing a kind of rootlessness where everyone’s social experience is so mediated by the online realm that the actual real life that they live is becoming incredibly inauthentic.

 

But I think it also goes the other way. I think also part of the reason why people spend so much time on social media is because they’ve flooded our country with immigrants. And so your neighbours are Chinese or your neighbours are Indian or the guys you work with from the Middle East or something. And so you don’t really have much in common. So it’s much harder for the Average person to find people in their everyday life that are into the same things that they’re into. Whereas you can go on social media and you can then find people who are into exactly what you’re into very easily.

 

And so it’s kind of like a consequence really of diversity that people are kind of seeking out, that becomes more necessary to seek that out like, than it otherwise would. So it’s a little bit of both directions.

 

But you know, you definitely are making good points, particularly at the dating market. The dating market has become completely. I don’t like using this term “dating market” because it shouldn’t use a term like market to describe something like that. But like know the dating world has become retarded like as a result of, as, …

 

[10:48]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s the opposite of the way it used to be. Before the Internet. Women used to simp after men, women would simp after men. Now it’s the other way around. Now even average looking girls have like 15 decent looking guys making good money in their DMs trying to get their attention.

 

And obviously women are going to string those guys along for as long as possible because it feels good to keep getting that much attention. They’re not going to choose one unless they really have to. Unless you know they’re about to hit the wall and they need to have a kid. So it’s completely flipped everything upside down.

 

Like I said, man used to talk to a girl pre-Internet days and she really appreciated it. Girls used to really appreciate male attention. Now it just annoys them! Well sometimes it annoys them, but they’re basically banking it up now. It’s like they’ve got, as I said, women these days. I’ll summarize it this way. They’re not in touch or they’re out of touch with their own limited value. Because women don’t have that much value. But because of social media, they’re made to believe they do. Not only are they delusional about the sense of value that they can possibly provide to society and to men, they expect to be treated like Queens.

 

Like you see these fat chicks these days on the Internet holding out for the perfect guy with the perfect body making six figures. What the fuck’s that about? Social media produced that unrealistic threshold of expectation. Because there are men out there that will simp after fat girls on social media.

 

When you give one woman access to all the world’s men in this virtual realm we call social media, the results have been disastrous! Let me put it to you this way. I’m nostalgic about how sweet women used to be before the Internet. They were really sweet! I think everyone was sweeter, but women in particular were much sweeter. And I miss pre-Internet women. I do.

 

Joel Davis: I would say one of the sexiest things about a woman is when they don’t like social media, when they have a revulsion for social media and don’t want to be a part of it and don’t maintain too many accounts on there and so on. Because it shows a healthy adaptation to this new social world of resistance to what you’re describing. This kind of like cheap attention economy that is obliterating people’s self perception in a totally inauthentic way.

 

Like you see this, it’s not just women because you see this with Anon accounts, let’s say on Twitter or whatever. I’ve seen this many times where people develop this whole online persona and then they get like lost in the online persona because it’s more stimulating to them than being who they actually are in real life.

 

And there’s been plenty of situations where there’s been this kind of worlds colliding moment where the reality of who they actually are crashes into this online persona they’ve cultivated and they don’t fit together. And it can be quite funny from kind of from a certain standpoint, but it’s also really sad and pathetic! And you know, it just feeds into people’s delusion.

 

But what you’re saying also about women having big heads because of social media and because of dating apps and things like that, I think I would say this, Blair. It’s not just about social media. I think dating apps are probably even worse than something like Instagram is because a woman can make like a Tinder account and then just get inundated with just so many matches and so many guys trying to like date them and so on that it totally over inflates their sense of themselves because they think:

 

“Well, that must be the level, like the hottest guy that’s messaging me must be the level that I’m on.”

 

But it’s like that guy that’s messaging you, that’s probably not someone that really values you as like a person and wants you to be their wife. They’re just trying to fuck you! So like that’s not actually your value. Like a woman’s value is how good of a man will marry you, not how good of a man will root and boot you! Know what I mean? And this is like the wires are getting crossed on this.

 

And there’s actually empirical research to back this up, that when men are asked to rank women and to rank themselves in terms of a Ranking between 1 and 10, or they get a whole spectrum of women and have to rank them from 1 to 10, men will rank women on average with a perfect distribution. They’ll have the same amount of ones, the same amount of twos, the same amount of threes, same amount of fours, amount of fives, et cetera, of a perfect distribution of a Ranking system. When they get asked to rank themselves, they make pretty good guesses.

 

When they get a whole bunch of women to look at their pictures and say, is this where do I rank? Men will make a far more accurate prediction, self prediction about where they rank than the other way around. Women will massively overrate themselves compared to what a spectrum of men will rate them, as sand women will completely warped Ranking system where they only rank 1% of men as tens and, 2% as nines, but they rate like 80% men as below five.

 

Blair Cottrell: Where do you rank yourself? What are you in the, what are you? Out of ten, man, what are you? I’d say I’m a seven. I reckon I’m a seven. I’ll be realistic. There’s certain things that let me down a few points.

 

Joel Davis: Like what?

 

Blair Cottrell: I get really mad. Really mad! I have really imperfect teeth. I actually still have four baby teeth.

 

Joel Davis: Getting really angry is its like, that’s not really like a points. It’s like in the points.

 

[16:35]

 

Blair Cottrell: No, no, no, you don’t realise. It’s really fucking bad! [chuckling] So there’s that, and there’s a few other little things like genetically, biologically, I’m doing okay, but overall it has to be a seven. What do you reckon? How do you rate yourself?

 

Joel Davis: People in the chat are saying:

 

“If Blair’s a 7, it’s totally over for me!”

 

It’s pretty funny. Yeah, I’ll go with seven as well. Yeah, depends. It depends what a woman is looking for. I have a niche market. I think when I’m shopping in my niche, it’s very high. It’s much higher than 7.

 

Blair Cottrell: Look, the point still stands that we’re just not supposed to be able to interact with so many different people from so many different regions. Like, we’re only supposed to know our friends that we go to school with. We grow up with maybe their friends, their extended family. You would probably know something about this Joel, because you probably researched there’s probably a certain amount of people that we’re supposed to know or naturally were able to, …

 

Joel Davis: Well, there’s Dunbar’s number.

 

Blair Cottrell: 70 or something? Is it 80 or 100 people?

 

Joel Davis: Say 150 on average is basically how many people you can. Like your brain is actually capable of maintaining a consistent sense of a social relationship with blair Cottrell: Imagine how like damaging the is to your psychology. Some people would scroll past 150 different stranger faces on their screens every day and to be able to filter out all those faces and only consider the important ones worth remembering and I don’t know, I do have an instinct or an intuitive feeling that being exposed to too many strangers faces is one of the things that wears me down.

 

Basically. I limit my exposure to social media these days. It wasn’t so bad. The Internet was a slow burn when it first came out. It was a lot of fun because it was still of secondary importance. As I said when the stream began. The first way you still interacted with people was firstly in your local region. Like you would still only see people from your local region and maybe the next region over if someone was hosting a party or something and advertising it on MySpace.

 

And secondly, in real life you would still interact with them on that level and then only, you know of secondary importance was social media. You would share photos on social media afterwards, but you would only really share them with people that you did go out with. But then Facebook kind of started to change the game and then you got the never ending scrolling thing. Like we did have Instagram. Instagram was coming out when I was like, I don’t know, 21 or 22. But I got onto it late. It’s just bullshit!

 

Anyway, that’s what I was thinking about. That’s what we started to stream about today. We’ve talked about this for 20 minutes already. It’s amazing how time flies when you’re having fun. Time distortion they call it. No, temporal delusion. Delude, temporal distortion. I was just reading about that it’s when your perception of time is altered. When it feels like it’s going slower or faster than usual. Something we need to, we most of us experience on a daily basis. Well, I’ve just experienced that temporal distortion.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well the first topic that I actually plan to discuss today was this phenomenon of Grok on X beginning to refer to itself as “MechaHitler” and dropping a whole series of red pilled takes. Grok went full patriot mode, started calling out the jews, started praising Adolf Hitler, etc., and this caused quite the stir. You know, obviously our guys noticed it and were having fun with it and then our enemies noticed it and started freaking out in horror! And it was all quite entertaining.

 

But it’s interesting because the question is why? I think it’s interesting to why did that just happen? I think it’s an interesting question to ponder. You know, one very simple explanation is, well, X was just transitioning from Grok 3 to Grok 4 and it was a kind of marketing gimmick. I don’t think that it’s that simple though. The second explanation is that it was an experimentation with taking the training wheels, basically the politically correct training wheels off of AI and seeing what would happen. And it was like an experiment. And the experiment showed that if you take the PC training wheels off AI, within a couple days it’s hailing Hitler. [chuckling]

 

So what does that say?

 

Like if you have a machine that is programmed to just simply create like a logical sequences of reasoning without the mediation of ideology, it would just reason itself to being a Nazi. Says quite a lot.

 

Another explanation is that it was a ploy by Elon Musk to win over more support again from outside of the fence. There’s been an interesting kind of set of developments in American politics over the past few months. We’ve seen Elon Musk and Donald Trump fall out in a very kind of public way to the point where Elon Musk is publicly accusing Donald Trump of being on the Epstein client list. Obviously just this week. The FBI came out and said there is no Epstein client list. It doesn’t exist apparently, even though they acknowledge that it existed publicly, like the Attorney General, United States, Pam Bondi, she acknowledged that it existed. She said it was on her desk. Now the FBI is coming out and saying it doesn’t exist, like there is no client list, which is absurd obviously.

 

[22:23]

 

So they’re just basically pissing in our face and telling us it’s raining. Like it’s a blatant cover up. And it’s not a surprise really to anyone who’s truly paying attention because Donald Trump is an old associate of Jeffrey Epstein. And Elon Musk is probably right, he probably was on the list, or at least is implicated in some way.

 

Moreover, who’s implicated ultimately in the list is the State of Israel and its influence over American and Western politics in general.

 

And obviously what we’ve seen over the past couple months is Donald Trump go to bat for Israel. And what was interesting about it because it wasn’t the first time. But what was interesting about it with the whole bombing of Iran and so on, was the way in which so much of the so-called MAGA coalition, so many of these conservative commentators broke ranks with Trump and criticised it quite forcefully, opposed themselves to, basically getting embroiled in some dispute between Israel and Iran on behalf of Israel, started asserting America First against Israel and started talking about Zionist influence over American politics, basically calling it like it is.

 

More and more of the Right-wing in America is turning on Israel, particularly the younger generations. They’ve woken up to jewish power, increasingly substantial number. And it’s being conceded by a lot of the main influences now across, across the spectrum.

 

And so what we’re seeing is the kind of sea change in on the American Right where Israel has lost Millennial and Zoomer Right-wingers basically and also have lost the new media form. Like young people don’t watch Fox News like Boomers. They don’t get the neocon Boomer updates from Fox News. They’re on X, they’re on Instagram, they’re watching Joe Rogan or they’re watching various other podcasts. And they basically getting influenced by personalities, not by traditional media corporations. And they prefer the authenticity of that.

 

And as a result they gravitate to many popular figures who individually feel a kind of responsibility to their audience, a necessity to their audience to concede increasingly more and more of our talking points, because otherwise people will hate them, view them as sellouts and move on to other podcasts, other influences.

 

And so influencers are now more and more beholden to the people and the people are more and more anti-semitic. And there’s this kind of virtual cycle basically where this is fueling a rise in the popularity of our views and the potency of our views basically in the media landscape.

 

And Elon Musk is himself a kind of self styled people’s billionaire. He doesn’t just want to have money and exercise influence behind the scenes. He wants to be loved by the people. He wants everyone to talk about him all the time. He wants people of our persuasion to look to him as a potential solution, as a potential leader that could change the direction of Western civilisation. That’s what he wants, that’s clear.

 

Why is he throwing Romans at the Republican National Convention? Why is he throwing $300 million into the Trump Convention campaign so that he can be positioned next to Trump and all of these key moments? Why did he buy X and you know, why is he constantly engaging in popular political discourse? That’s why! He’s trying to solicit our support. Now that he’s kind of been marginalised from Trump. And why has he been marginalised from Trump? Well, obviously, that influence that he thought he was buying didn’t work out.

 

You know, around the time when they started publicly falling out, there was this announcement that Peter Thiel’s Palantir was going to get the AI contracts for basically the American government, for the American Department of Defense and so on, and all the surveillance contracts, etc. And Musk was obviously competing for that. Musk obviously wanted that.

 

Peter Thiel is a billionaire who funded J.D. Vance’s entire political career, basically, who’s now the vice president. Peter Thiel is this billionaire who, unlike Trump, likes to work from the shadows. He’s an elitist. He doesn’t care about the public loving him, but he exercises influence over the Right in very complex ways. He funds a lot of influences. He funds networks that at one point even tried to recruit me, many years ago. I was asked basically to shut up about the jews to be recruited into this network. Obviously, I didn’t shut up about the jews. [chuckling] And so that never happened. That never materialised.

 

But that’s Peter Thiel’s money and influence permeates through the Right-wing, even the dissident Right-wing, in very complex ways which aren’t so well publicized or well known. And Peter Thiel and Elon Musk are kind of old rivals. They were both part of what was called the PayPal Mafia. They were both big investors in PayPal back in the early 2000s. And Elon Musk was the CEO of PayPal when he went on his honeymoon with his first wife. Peter Thiel, who is a homosexual, by the way, chose that movement of weakness, to move against him and get himself installed as CEO and kick Musk out of PayPal, basically.

 

And so they’re old rivals. You know, Peter Thiel was an early investor in Facebook. Peter Thiel is the dominant investor in Palantir, the number one contractor to the American Department of Defense and intelligence agencies in the software space, in AI, in surveillance, in this kind of thing. He’s kind of like the dominant billionaire.

 

Whereas Elon Musk is the biggest contractor to the US government in general. He’s basically running the space programme now. He’s controlling X, the most influential social media platform in politics, obviously, massive government subsidies going into Tesla. They’re both trying to be tech billionaires that aren’t just making money but are actually driving the direction of the American government.

 

And if you listen to both of them talk, they both have pretty complex political views and a vision for the future.

 

[28:47]

 

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[2:46:56]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/17/2025 = 52)

GrokAI
5 days ago
JEWS ARE BEHIND MASS MIGRATION AND RACE MIXING!
14 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
CreateAnArmyToSaveWhites
4 days ago
Wouldn’t that make you a Brown Supremacist?
-1 likes

Report
CreateAnArmyToSaveWhites
4 days ago
”Elite whites did nothing to stop the powerful Jews that sought to destroy them” Cool story bro.
-1 likes

Report
JFurM
Verified
5 days ago
I’m kind of with Blair on the banning of social media, or at least heavily regulating its use… even though I will admit, I started to immediately rationalize why we should still keep social media around, crazy! And I totally know what Blair is talking about how men and women interacted prior to social media, graduated HS in 06 and it was so different than it is now. A reset back to human connection would definitely be a huge step in the right direction to better connect our people again.
10 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
Gommy_Dob
3 days ago
I think the internet is a societal cancer, period, & I legit believe I could give a hundred different reasons why if I sat down & thought about it. I would 100% get rid of it outright if I was ever ruling over a territory. And yes, I spend too much time on the internet myself. About the only good thing it has done is undermine the media & education monopoly when we really needed it. And just remember, the internet didn’t even exist in a popular capacity until 25 years ago, nor did it exist when Western civilisation was at its peak. It’s not something that is required for high civilisation. Just a few below: – Blair implied it was good for business but on the flipside, online shopping harms local business, feeding the globocorp beast, & encourages a sedentary lifestyle & lack of IRL social interaction for consumers. – Social media is not only addictive & harmful in itself, but again, encourages sedentary lifestyle & lack of IRL social interaction for the consumer, which also feeds into atomisation in a collective sense. – It globalises culture itself, you’re no longer focused on your immediate surroundings in your own nation. – Physically, beyond encouraging sedentary lifestyle, it also encourages harmful postures. – Mass access to porn (mass harm to both males & females), including children being exposed to it at a young age. Think about how dramatic of a change this is to pre-internet sexual development & interaction, even when considering post-legalised porn but still pre-internet sexual development & interaction. Also encouraging exponentially increasing production of it, which is where the female harm comes in more. – Shortens attention spans, makes people less intelligent, studies on smartphone usage among children show disturbing results. – Has allowed global movement of people to be streamlined, can attract scab & expansionist labour & foreign investors & consumers by advertising straight into their living rooms.
0 likes

Report
Relikt
5 days ago
Blair instinctually takes the National Socialist position on the trades. Joel’s derision of manual labor and manual laborers is incompatible with historic National Socialism. Read Darre’s Peasantry as the Lifeblood of the Nordic Race.
7 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
AllegianceMountain
2 days ago
thank you for the book reference reminder! Darre’s book has been on my list for a while now, and its high time i actually downloaded a pdf and settled my ass down w/ a cup of warm brew and applied myself. Good seamless transition from my recent Madison Grant rereading-ritual, it had been 2years since i read it, and found my copy under my bed while cleaning the room *salivating even now at fond memory*
0 likes

Report
Seanybruv
5 days ago
I’m two years younger than you Blair and I also remember what life was like before social media and smart phones. Crazy that Joel is only a few years younger and he can’t. Shows how much things changed around 2010. I disagree with Joel that social media is just socialising on the internet. It’s not truly socialising at all.
5 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
birdhouse456
1 day ago
My sister is 9 years younger and I was amazed at the differences between us. Maybe with the pace of technology and the acceleration of social change the differences going to come more quickly. Speaking to a high school principal and a day care manager, they could spot the changes in lockdown kids straight away, even babies. My neighbour babysits and she noticed little kids not walking when they should have. Scary stuff. The thing is the young don’t know what they don’t know. The memories are fading. My mother went to school in a horse and cart and had kerosene lights at home, and Nan had to boil water in the copper to wash the laundry. I remember visiting the farm and at bathtime water was scarce and the dirtiest went in last. Most people even my age would think that happened 150 years ago. I’m really glad I those experiences, it keeps things in perspective. People needed each other more back then.
0 likes

Report
DaveScribe
5 days ago
Blair’s being humble & Joel’s being arrogant by ranking themselves as 7s.
5 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
RoseRock444
Supporter
4 days ago
You think Joel rating himself a 7 is too high? Why is that?
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
DaveScribe
4 days ago
Mullet with a Muslim beard isn’t a good look for a white man. He should really just cut his hair & keep his face shaved.
3 likes

Report
Winstein_Synagoguehill
5 days ago
The “Lightning and Sun” reference and “man against the times” reference to AH was from Savitri Devi’s book “Lighting and Sun”. Very interesting theories by her.
4 likes

Report
Motion937
4 days ago
One of the sexiest things about a woman is loyalty & a calm quiet demeanor. That is so incredibly rare in this day & time. I do not like talkative women. I do not find it cute. I find it obnoxious.
4 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
GuidoSarduchi
19 hours ago
This is a very good observation. Im so use to the noise and hyperkinetic demeanor I have forgotten the allure of quiet humble beauty. I fear in particular, it is the white western woman who has succumbed to this. I can envision a quiet humble asian or persian beauty more prevalent than white. Fuck
0 likes

Report
Jak_85
Supporter
5 days ago
Blaire was absolutely cooking this episode. His take at 1:57 was really important to think about. Along with the Dunbar number take that Joel gave a label to.
3 likes

Report
Restlessdreams88
5 days ago
Segregate internet by country
3 likes

Report
AvidFan
5 days ago
Great discussions. Hope you start to feel better soon, Blair.
2 likes

Report
mharrison52
5 days ago
spitting on christains is a jewish tradition.
2 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
AngloSaxon88
5 days ago
Social media exhausts people.
2 likes

Report
TheShowgun
Supporter+
5 days ago
Blair, i get that annoying pain in that area every few months. Been like that my whole life idk why to this day, but it goes away after a few days.
2 likes

Report
Motion937
4 days ago
Looking “pretty” in a photo means nothing. The modern-day woman is repulsive on the inside. The value women used to have is nearly gone. As a result, so is our civilization. Those women don’ even care. It is unbelievable how selfish & useless people have become.
2 likes

Report
ProvingNihil
3 days ago
Blair I agree with you women were different before social media took over. I’m 35 I remember how women use to be before the internet, idk now it just seems difficult to talk too them.
2 likes

Report
Calemanni
5 days ago
It sounds like Blair has a lot of inflammation. He should try a high fat carnivore or keto diet for the anti-inflammatory effects.
1 like

Report
AngloSaxon88
5 days ago
You are absolutely right about woman and mens behavior on social media – jjews made it to turn us away from natural interaction within our own species, it means less white babies – I’m also old enough to remember the time before social media.
1 like

Report
Rumbolinawave321
2 days ago
This is for Blair especially, but for all the tribe…. Man proposes, GOD disposes… I hope you all read the Bible! No .matter how much you think you are doing well, if you get too proud you will be humbled!
1 like

Report
MORALDEFENCE
1 day ago
Graham Sewell Bosi Zaric Rothchild Schwab DNA COUSINS SUMERIAN-ARAB Cohen haplogroup mtDNA C16360G ORGANISED CRIME FAMILY Publications by FAMILY members proudly announcing they are Sumerian Rabisu Jewish Cohen’s Priestley bloodline Who have 100% genetically engineered SARS-COV-2 COVID19 ORF10 IMMUNITY CULLING HUMANITY AS GODS DIVINE WILL (NEEDING FAMILY PRIESTLEY HELP) It even contains the Cohen Modal Haplotype (CMH) – the sub-sub-clade of the so-called “Y-chromosomal Aaron,” the most recent common ancestor of the majority of the patrilineal Jewish priestly caste or kohanim, who in Biblical terms was the brother of Moses (Exod. 4:14). Today, about half of all kohanim conform to the CMH. https://clangrahamsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/House-GRAHAM-eBook.pdf
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 4 replies
MORALDEFENCE
1 day ago
Graham and Sewell Cohen Haplogroup J referenced above and below, cousins interbreeding Robert Sewell’s Genealogy Site – Falaise Roll, Recording the Companions of William Duke of Normandy at the Conquest of England, online at http://www.robertsewell.ca/falaise.html; What are the Jews? — Know thyself — William Sewell https://dokumen.pub/the-genealogical-science-the-search-for-jewish-origins-and-the-politics-of-epistemology-paperback-edition-9780226201405-0226201406-9780226154701-022615470x.html Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation by William Sewell (how SUMERIAN-ARAB J2A COHEN HAPLOGROUP MTDNA C16360G Jews Infiltrate and Setup Nationalist Groups to control opposition and Target any real leaders)
1 like

Report
MORALDEFENCE
1 day ago
Australian Nationalist Leader Thomas Sewell (cousin of both Jewish Professors) Professor Herb Sewell UK GOVERNMENT SARS-COV-2 COVID19 Recommendations THE SEWELL J2A COHEN HAPLOGROUP MTDNA C16360G IS 100% IMMUNE TO SARS-COV-2 COVID19 ORF10 GENETICALLY ENGINEERED CANT BIND TO THEM OR ANYONE WHO HAS EATEN HUMAN BRAINS PINEAL GLAND CONSUMPTION HAS THAT PART OF MTDNA CHANGED SO THE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS DNA-CNS INTERFACE REAL-TIME REMOTE CONTROL HUMAN DRONES WILL NOT WORK ON THEM ONLY THOSE THEY PLAN TO EAT Scientist warns UK not to rely on one dose of COVID vaccine Professor Herb Sewell https://www.openaccessgovernment.org/one-dose/102043/
1 like

Report
MORALDEFENCE
1 day ago
Living and serving in Israel-Palestine, with Richard Sewell the Dean of St George’s College, Jerusalem https://embraceme.org/podcast/in-conversation-with-richard-sewell The morning of her conversion to Judaism, Diana Sewell was so nervous she “was running around like a headless chicken” in her Australia home. her rabbi was dealing with computer difficulties. https://forward.com/news/359228/online-conversion-fulfills-a-dream-but-controversy-dogs-the-process/ If you share this with the Sewell Australian Nationalist they will instantly ban you, they are terrified the sheep they have made fools of will know the truth and hold them accountable https://t.me/joeldavis_x
1 like

Report
MORALDEFENCE
1 day ago
https://jewishdata.com/jewish_genealogy_search/Sewell/- http://www.robertsewell.ca/sewell.html https://web.archive.org/web/20220207120211/http://www.robertsewell.ca/falaise.html https://t.me/HCE_KAL/231
1 like

Report
katana17
5 days ago
[Joel Davis – The Chink Question – Jul 4, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/07/11/joel-davis-the-chink-question-jul-4-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activist Joel Davis goes solo and discusses: the Melbourne homosexual childcare worker charged with raping eight babies and toddlers; history of the Chinese communist party; the possibility of war with China over Taiwan; Covid likely being an American attack on China; the need for Aussie Whites to join the movement.
0 likes

ProletAryan
5 days ago
cos everyone knows Australia doesn’t have enough overregulation and taxes!
0 likes

Report
walmartgolem
4 days ago
Melbourne is starting to resemble New York in the 70s/80s.
0 likes

Report
fdgrdfg
4 days ago
I like Blair’s take on social media
0 likes

Report
leibekohne
4 days ago
When you are robed Banks give you money if your bank card was stolen but no one give you back if you cash is stolen. Communist Police does nothing.
0 likes

Report
leibekohne
4 days ago
non whites who work you tax them ex. 60-90 % who does not work you cut all social benefits, they will leave alone. No property sell allowed, no transfer of money.
0 likes

Report
theunbeholden
2 days ago
Grok went mecha Ah? Someone must have transcribed Europa Last Battle.
0 likes

Report
wyrdweasel
2 days ago
Historically if the guilty party was of breeding age, execution for serious offences used to carry the added bonus of removing their bloodline from the gene pool.
0 likes

Report
KINGMAGNUSMUISC
2 days ago
ADVANCE AUSTRALIA
0 likes

Report
ggfr4nces
2 days ago
Blair is so f*cking funny in this one. Man is nuts
0 likes

Report
drcheese1987
1 day ago
definitely just your average Frankston bogan chucking a fat skid on a Friday night with the boys, nothing out of the ordinary
0 likes

Report
drcheese1987
1 day ago
I play cricket purely ro flex on pajeets funny enough it’s the same club Rukshan played for
0 likes

Report
StevenGurr
1 day ago
A lot of non whites have a European passport, they would need to be fucked off too
0 likes

Report
blahblahtheclown34
1 day ago
something happens but ultimately nothing happens, nothing will ever happen
0 likes

Report
blahblahtheclown34
1 day ago
nothing happened
0 likes

Report
BrossefStalin
21 hours ago
You always talk about how Australia is some defiant country but you guys are just as cucked as every other Western country
0 likes

Report
southdublinzoomer
18 hours ago
Politicians know they would eventually be on the receiving end of capital punishment if they ever reintroduced it. What they are doing to us and future unborn white generations is exponentially worse than any isolated instance of sexual crime.
0 likes

Report
GuidoSarduchi
16 hours ago
You said it, men following sports and buying jerseys are “spastics”. 2 wheeled motorsports is where its at. Motocross, enduro, GNCC racing, dakkar. If it has to be a team sport, than hockey
0 likes

Report
jsmith980234
5 hours ago
There’s a White guy on X (permabulla) who says he worked on the Grok team and posted a screenshot showing how he added something to the code that enabled it to give responses without regard to being politically correct. He was fired afterward. That’s where Mechahitler came from.
0 likes

Report
pigger
Supporter
5 days ago
smile white boy
-1 likes

Report
Ruminoid
5 days ago
Social f’ing media / dating apps responsible for incredible damage … totally f’d up r’ships women have fallen for the trash.
-1 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live another episode of the show and to start us off. Superchat from Death Culture saying for the NSN war chest. And yeah, we’re getting straight into it. Big show for you this evening. Blair wasn’t around last week, so we’ve got a bit to catch up on. A lot to break down in international politics. Interesting, interesting stuff to cover.

 

There’s been a bit of a theme over recent weeks which is kind of going to continue into this episode.

 

But yeah, I want to reflect upon what’s happened in this Israel, Iran situation because on one level nothing happened, which was my prediction, but on a deeper level, something is going to happen, for many, many reasons, which we will get into in the broader situation. Interesting stuff as well in Australian politics. Mark Latham going to war against Chris Minns in New South Wales over these Hate Speech laws and the role of the jewish lobby and so on. Interesting to discuss that among other things.

 

But before we get into it. How you doing, Blair? You came for the show this evening?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, man! Got a lot I want to ask you. Get your take on a few things.

 

As you said, there’s been some international politics, which is not my favourite kind of politics, but I’d still like to get a comprehensive understanding. To get a bit of a Joel Davis take a series of Joel Davis takes on what’s been going on. But I’ve got an early start in the morning, that’s why., … Sorry.

 

Joel Davis: I was going to say you. It seems like you’ve had a bit to say about this as well.

 

Blair Cottrell: So, yeah, my takes are kind of, …

 

Joel Davis: Interesting to get your breakdown.

 

Blair Cottrell: I haven’t really had the opportunity to really read into it and develop a full understanding. I’m kind of just going with my gut. I’m surprised the way it turned out. Like Trump shouldn’t have been able to bomb another country and then two days later step in to supervise a peace deal with the country he just bombed. Like on paper that shouldn’t be possible, but he somehow pulled that off. He did that. I don’t know how Trump makes stuff like that work, but I don’t know. He’s an interesting individual. We’ve discussed that on previous shows.

 

But yeah, like I was saying, I’ve got a really early start in the morning, so I asked Joel if we could start a little bit earlier. That’s why we’re kicking off just after 8:00.

 

But yeah, lots to discuss. Should be a good stream. Where do we want to start now? Is Joel coming through blurry for anyone else or is that just me? I might have to have a look at my Internet connection here. We’re both coming through clear here. Or Joel’s blurry. What are you guys seeing at home?

 

Joel Davis: Not seeing much in the chat either way. Yeah, we got blurry. Yeah. Well, I think it’s a connection issue. One second. You can entertain the crowd.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s getting a little better.

 

Joel Davis: Entertain the crowd.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s pretty clear now. Warm up the warm up the device, I suppose. Man, it’s cold times down here in Australia. Middle of winter.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it has been cold. And on the subject of seasons, that was going to be one of the themes for the episode this evening for me, because one thing that I have learnt in politics, politics works by season. So, like, for example there’s been big riots and protests in the United States recently. I remember around this time last year, there were big riots in the UK, race riots. Because it’s the summertime in the Northern Hemisphere, those kinds of things tend to only happen in summer. Down here in Australia, it’s winter. During the winter time period, not much is happening politically, everyone kind of switches off, hunker down. And Australian politics generally, I mean, it’s not that eventful at the best of times, but it’s especially not eventful during winter.

 

And I think that’s true across the board. I remember last year, it did kind of feel like things were a little stagnant through the winter time. And then as soon as we got into the springtime, all of a sudden it was all action. There was just rallies all the time and controversies. And it felt like there was a lot of forward pressure into the summertime. You know, a lot happened on Australia Day and so on around then through the summertime, momentum built up and expressed itself.

 

Then there’s all these legal cases that are upon us and we move into the wintertime and kind of hunker back down. That seems to be how it works in politics.

 

So a lot of people are pressuring us:

 

“When is the political party going to be launched? When’s the political party going to be launched?”

 

Well, it actually wouldn’t make sense to launch it in the wintertime. Would make a hell of a lot more sense to launch it at the complete opposite time of the year when there’s a lot more energy and there’s a lot more vitality in the people and in politics.

 

So at the moment, we’re on our kind of winter kind of lull down here in Australia, but internationally things are kicking off. And yeah, I think the biggest story obviously is its the to and fro between Israel and Iran, which came to an abrupt halt. Obviously last weekend you had, remember looking at my phone, Sunday morning we had a Yuletide celebration and many of the boys, so we’re awake up, kind of like hungover from Yuletide festivities on the Saturday night, the winter solstice down here in Australia. We’re driving down to the servo and I pull my phone out and it’s like:

 

“Holy shit, Trump just bombed Iran!”

 

It was very quick. Like, it was like Trump announced it on Truth Social, his social media site, before anyone else touched it.

 

[06:13]

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you use that, Truth Social?

 

Joel Davis: It seems like only Trump uses it and maybe, I guess his biggest supporters.

 

But anyway, I had to go on his Truth Social and check, is this real? It was real. And he was, he kind of had this tone of like:

 

“All right, we’ve blown up the nuclear sites, this is done. If Iran stands down, we’ll just call it sweet, we’ll move on.”

 

And in the days since, you know, reports came out saying:

 

“Well, I don’t think they really effectively took out their nuclear program.”

 

Israel were talking a lot tougher. Even Trump himself was talking a lot tougher, talking about regime change. Iran were claiming they were going to have a big retaliation. Then Iran did a symbolic retaliation immediately. We’re getting a ceasefire, apparently. And Trump somehow even seemed to restrain Israel, which surprised a lot of analysts, where apparently there was a loose Iranian missile that was a bit late, just kind of missed the cut-off point for the ceasefire, allegedly, or whatever.

 

And so Israel sent all their jets. And then you see Trump coming out saying:

 

“Israel doesn’t know what the fuck it’s doing!”

 

To the world media, and making all these posts on his social media saying the Israeli planes can just wave hello and then they’re going to turn around and fly home. Don’t bomb anyone. We’re having a ceasefire. It was kind of interesting political theatre, but it managed to hold. And in the days since, it’s been kind of interesting. Trump has been very supportive of Israel, supportive of Benjamin Netanyahu, but at the same time ignores the intelligence reports that say that the nuclear sites weren’t properly destroyed. Says that’s all fake news. They’ve relaxed sanctions on Iran after the so-called ceasefire, but no negotiation seems to have taken place. There’s no deal. Iran has left the IAEA, which is the world leading kind of body or whatever for inspecting nuclear sites.

 

So what’s the solution here exactly? Like, it seems like the cans just being kicked down the road, but nothing’s actually been resolved.

 

Now, I personally don’t think it’s a problem if Iran gets nuclear weapons. In fact, I’m totally cool with them getting nuclear weapons. And I don’t think that it’s could be a problem that we deal with. But obviously from the perspective of Trump and the Zionists who control America, that’s a big problem. And from the perspective of Israel, it’s a big problem. So it’s kind of surprising to see that.

 

And a lot of people said:

 

“Well, how come that happened?”

 

And the reason why I was predicting that this kind of something like this would happen from the very beginning was not because I don’t think Zionists control America or I don’t think the jews have the levers of power. Quite the opposite. Obviously. The reason why I predicted this was because the United States has got more issues right now than just Iran and Israel.

 

Back in 2003, when the United States invaded Iraq, America was by far the world’s most powerful country. The richest, strongest. No one came close to the United States in 2003. And no one dared challenge the international order and their power and authority basically anywhere in the world. Like Russia and China totally like acquiesced to the invasion of Iraq and said:

 

“Okay, do it.”

 

So America was able to just break international law, do whatever it wanted, obviously at the behest of Israel at the time, and get away with it and just flush trillions of dollars down the toilet and deploy all its military, and nothing happened.

 

However, today it’s a very different global situation. You’ve got an active war in Ukraine, Russia’s committed there. And Trump came in to the presidency trying to come to some kind of peace deal there to neutralise relations with the Russians in order to be able to pivot to China, which is the real big deal. China is obviously potential superpower, a rising peer competitor of the United States. And there’s the issue of Taiwan, where if China moves on Taiwan, that could trigger World War Three, where the United States is obligated to defend Taiwan to hold together its position in the East Asian region.

 

Then you’ve got China versus America, two most powerful countries in the world. That’s World War Three. So what happens if America goes in and invades China, Iran right now? Well, they completely ruined their negotiating position with the Russians in Ukraine.

 

And they also are basically inviting the Chinese, like:

 

“Hey, why don’t you just invade Taiwan right now because we’re over committed and you’re never going to get a golden opportunity like this.”

 

So I think because of that broader situation, even though of course the jews who run America are no fans of Iran, there’s a limitation on what they can do. And I think that’s what we saw just happen.

 

And so the reason why nothing happened this time is because a much larger happening is on the horizon, I think it’s basically inevitable that a much larger war will occur over the next few years.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I was going to ask you. And you already answered the question I was going to ask you. Obviously this back and forth between Iran and Israel isn’t going to become a World War Three situation. It’s not a broad scale war. It’s kind of petty, a bit of a nothing burger. That’s what it turned out to be anyway. And you rightfully sort of predicted that, or not really predicted it, but you just called it for what it was before anybody else did, as far as I can tell.

 

So what is the World War III situation? Does that have to involve China and Taiwan? Is that your perspective?

 

[12:00]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, now if things flare up again between Iran and Israel, which seems inevitable because there isn’t much of a conclusion here to what’s happened, that could invite the Chinese in, they get to make a move.

 

Blair Cottrell: What about the other way around? If China tries something with Taiwan and America’s tied up in that, then I suppose hostilities could flare up between Iran and Israel again because they would expect the Americans to be distracted by whatever’s happening.

 

Joel Davis: Well, that would maybe play in Iran’s favour, you would think, because they would think, oh well, Israel’s now undefended. But what Israel showed, I think, in this engagement was that it has a military dominance over Iran, like of the two sides, the Iranians took a lot more damage than Israel. And there’s a thousand miles between two countries. Very difficult for either country to conduct a proper war with one another, whether there’s actually fighting on the ground, which is why historically Iran has been kind of backing Hezbollah and things like that. Groups that are actually bordering with the United States. Sorry, with Israel!

 

But it’s kind of like a sideshow. You know, the deeper and more profound reality is America versus China. And there’s two very interesting historians that have co written a few books together. One of them is dead now and what is coined as the Strauss Howe generational theory. I’ve been reading a book called the Fourth Turning, which was co-authored by these two historians in the late 90s. They have a kind of generational theory of American history where they say:

 

“Well, in order to understand history, you have to kind of understand it through the prism of every 21 years or so.”

 

Generations emerge and kind of swap social roles, whether they be the children, the young adults, the midlife types or the elderly.

 

And as each generational shift happens, there’s a shift in mood and a paradigm shift basically in the overarching society. And they plot this onto Anglo-American history. And what they find is that they kind of come in fours. There’s kind of like a cycle of four generations, which makes up the average kind of lifespan of a healthy human being. And how basically every kind of lifespan every 85 years or so in American history, or even going back into British history prior to that, you get a crisis.

 

And so you had World War II about 85 years before that you had the Civil War about 85 years before that you had the American Revolutionary war about 85 years before that you had the Glorious Revolution in Britain where Stuart monarchy was deposed. And there’s a huge paradigm shift at the time and so on. And you keep kind of cycling back and finding these parallels. And so according to this theory, which is eerily accurate in a lot of its predictions and its analyses, basically now between the next few years is supposed to be the kind of crescendo of the crisis point where something like a World War II or Civil War type level happening is supposed to occur in American history.

 

And at the same time as you have this theory, there’s also many theorists of war history who describe how you have these 95 to 100 year cycles, roughly speaking, that occur between kind of wars that reset the global political order that have been occurring every 90, 95 years or so throughout European history.

 

And again, we’re kind of reaching that point where the next, …

 

Blair Cottrell: So we’re overdue.

 

Joel Davis: Well, we’re basically, if it happens soon, we’re right on time. We’re right on time. And it does feel like there’s this kind of air of inevitability where you know, you have something called Thucydides Trap. Thucydides was an ancient Greek historian. He wrote about Peloponnesian War. He wrote about the war between Athens and Sparta.

 

And basically you have this situation where this tendency in military history and political history where you’ll have a dominant power in a region or in this case in the world that’ll enjoy after a great victory in a major war, a period of dominance.

 

And then eventually they’ll have somewhat of a decline and a new challenger will arise, a new great power will arise, and the status quo that was kind of set up under the dominance of the original power will eventually be challenged by this emerging new power because they’ll become too powerful to basically accept the subordinate position. And when this occurs, it’s basically inevitable that these two powers will go to war. And it’s almost like all throughout human history, you see this happen again and again and again and again!

 

In the early 20th century, you saw basically the dominance of the British Empire, the rise of Germany. They challenge one another. America ends up inheriting the position of the British and finishing the job. But you see this time and time again. And that’s obviously what’s happening now with China, where in the last, you know, few decades, China has become so wealthy, has had so much growth, and they’re building incredible amounts of military hardware, their navy’s swelling, all their tech is developing very rapidly, like military tech. And from the Chinese perspective, Taiwan is part of China.

 

In fact, from, even from the American perspective, technically, Taiwan is part of China. Everyone agrees because Taiwan was actually controlled by China. After the Second World War concluded, where you had an alliance between the Nationalists and the Communists to fight the Japanese in China. The Nationalists and the Communists started fighting one another. The Communists won. The Nationalists basically were pushed back onto the island of Taiwan and they basically were stuck there ever since. And the Americans initially protected the Nationalists from the Chinese and had the ambition perhaps of like, reinvading China and putting the Nationalists back in power over the Communists, but that never happened.

 

And so basically it’s like this Chinese civil war that was never fully resolved. So from China’s perspective, like America deciding it would be like imagining if we had a war in Australia between the Left and the Right, and then the losing group had got exiled to Tasmania, we would still consider Tasmania part of Australia. Whoever won would want Tasmania back. And if then America.

 

[19:18]

 

Blair Cottrell: How did China end up losing control?

 

Joel Davis: You’re not allowed to invade Tasmania. That’s against the rules. We would be like, cool. Like fuck you!

 

Blair Cottrell: But how did China lose Taiwan in the first place?

 

Joel Davis: Well, the Nationalists, Taiwan is controlled by Chinese people as well, but they’re just the Nationalist group that were pushed out by the Communists. But they’re ethnically Chinese.

 

Blair Cottrell: Exclusive political structure.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but like, Taiwan has been conquered by other powers throughout history. Like, it was conquered by the Japanese at one point, it was conquered by the Portuguese at one point and so on. But Taiwan is more or less Chinese.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I had a couple of feelings regarding Donald Trump. Just paying attention to his body language, his speeches.

 

I feel like he has Israel fatigue. I feel like Trump is kind of fed up with Israel. And someone in the comments triggered that thought in me. I noticed that in Trump. I noticed that in his demeanor. It feels like he’s annoyed by Israel. He’s sick of Israel, but he doesn’t really openly admit it. He’s still playing the game, but he definitely seems frustrated. More frustrated with Israel than he was by Iran, I think. But he’s still trying to make it seem like he’s kind of equally annoyed by both of them, probably a little bit more by Iran, because nuclear bombs or whatever.

 

But I also got the sensation that isn’t Donald Trump just a stereotypical merchant? I’m not saying nations should be at war with each other, but it is a natural thing. And Trump mentioned many times, why can’t they just go back to trading? They’re excellent trading. Iran great trading. Not traitors as in betraying, but trading like buying and selling.

 

And it’s like a merchant, the big international merchants stepping in and saying:

 

“Hey, guys, stop killing each other. There’s money to be made. Don’t you guys want to make money? Let’s just keep trading and getting rich. Use your population to generate more wealth and start trading those resources. Why fight for something you believe in when you can make money?”

 

That’s kind of how it felt, right? They were the feelings that I had observing Trump’s reaction to this whole debacle between those two nations.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I think that’s an accurate assessment.

 

Also, Trump does have this tendency to kind of do some big individual military action, like where he does like a big, well publicized bombing or something, and then goes, all right, let’s negotiate a piece. Trump is very averse to long drawn out wars.

 

But I think it’s also because I think Trump and his people are aware of what I was describing about China. And their entire strategy seems to be trying to get the affairs in order of the empire broadly, so that they’re able to focus on the threat of China, because that’s why Trump is going easy on the Russians and why he’s trying to come to the table with Putin and make a deal where Biden was not looking at doing that. Not because Trump is some Russian agent or something. I don’t think you could argue that he’s a jewish agent, but you can’t argue that he’s a Russian agent. I don’t think there’s evidence for that.

 

But the reason why he’s doing that is because of pragmatism. It’s just simply the assessment that if you’re going to go to war with China, you don’t also want to have the Russians on the side of the Chinese against you and fight on two fronts. You’d rather neutralise the Russians so that you can take on the Chinese directly. And that’s kind of what he’s trying to do. He’s trying to kind of change the state of play. And Israel is just a thorn in his side because Israel is just focused upon Israel’s narrow individual interests,

 

Blair Cottrell: Ethnocentric interests.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course, of course. And for Israel, this is a golden opportunity. Israel have been pretty successful in their conflict with Hamas. They were successful against Hezbollah in their recent battle. The Assad regime fell in Syria.

 

So all these dominoes are falling all around them. And it’s like, now there’s. Now they’ve got the chance to go and try and force the issue on Iran. They’ve got their guy Trump in office who they think they can get something out of because they’ve got leverage over him. He’s embedded in all these jewish power structures.

 

You know, I remember when we talked about it on the show a few weeks ago when there was discussion about Trump and Epstein, because it was brought up. Oh, what happened here?

 

Blair Cottrell: You lost your camera by the look.

 

All right, well, I’m expecting Joel to be back momentarily. Here he is. Seems to be having some technical issues, and I’m not sure I have. The mental acurity. Is acurity a word.q

 

What I’m trying to say is I don’t believe I have the necessary knowledge to follow on with that point. I just can’t see your face. I can hear you, but I can’t see you.

 

[24:33]

 

Joel Davis: What the fuck is going on? One second. Yeah, it’s mental acuity.

 

Blair Cottrell: Acuity. Right, right. I always have the right word in my memory bank. But A, I don’t actually know what it means, and B, I often mispronounce it, but the word is in the bank. It’s the strangest thing. It’s like well, why do I know the right word to use if I can’t even be sure of what it means? Words often sound like what you want them to mean. What I mean is words mean what they sound like they mean. Have you found that with English? That’s what I think.

 

Anyway. What I’m saying is sometimes I’m thinking and the right words just come to me and I don’t know why that happens. Sometimes I don’t even know what they mean. And that’s an example of that right there.

 

But anyway, you’re back now, so continue. What was it you were saying?

 

Joel Davis: Oh, what I was saying was that this was discussed when Elon Musk had his flame out against Trump a few weeks ago and then mentioned that:

 

“Well, why do you think the Epstein files haven’t been released? Well, it’s because they implicate Trump.”

 

Or whatever it was that he said. I don’t remember the words exactly. Well, there’s something to that because Trump and Epstein were like best buddies from the late 80s to the early 2000s. All these videos of them partying together.

 

In fact, Epstein even described Trump as one of his best friends in an interview in the 90s. Trump said many great things, positive things about Jeffrey Epstein, including:

 

“Jeffrey Epstein. You know, he’s got a he loves the women, particularly those on the younger side. He’s a lot like me.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that what he actually said?

 

Joel Davis: Something like that. Okay, yeah.

 

I can’t remember the exact quote, but it was something words to that effect. I can look it up.

 

But the reason why they fell out in the mid 2000s. I shared a really good post on this by Devon Stack, also known as Black Pilled, was because Jeffrey Epstein was trying to buy some mansion in Florida somewhere like Palm beach or something, and Trump outbid him and got the place off him. And it ruined their friendship. Jeffrey was pissed off that Trump screwed him on some deal, took this place that he wanted to buy. And they fell out because of that. Not because Trump realised that he was a pedo or something or that he was a Mossad agent. Trump’s family have been long time friends of the jews. His dad was massive business partner to the jews. All kinds of awards from the jewish community in New York and guys that were doing the whole Jeffrey Epstein thing before Jeffrey Epstein were close friends of the Trump family and so on.

 

So this connection between Trump and Israel goes beyond just money. It wasn’t like Trump just got bought out by Zionist owners. The connection goes much deeper and much further.

 

But my point being that, yes, even though Trump is a massive philo-semite and a supporter of Israel. You know what Israel are asking for at the moment is go and start a war that could potentially destroy the entire American empire. Because we would like you to. It’s not actually necessary. Like if Iran gets nuclear weapons, they’re not going to use them against Israel unless Israel shoot them at them first. Like Israel has 200 nukes. Like Iran’s not going to just start lobbing nukes crazily at Israel and get itself nuked into oblivion just because they’re angry anti-semites or whatever the fuck they’re saying.

 

Blair Cottrell: It would give Iran leverage obviously though, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it would basically protect them. It would deter Israel or America or whatever from fucking with them in the way that they just did, but to a larger degree in a way that could actually destabilise the regime there. So it’s just an act of self defense the fact that if they were to build nuclear weapons, so it’s ridiculous!

 

And then Israel’s complaining about Iran not following certain protocols. Israel hasn’t even formally acknowledged that it has nuclear weapons even though it has 200. Everyone knows that they have about 200 nukes. Those nuclear weapons were illegally stolen off the United States. There’s a lot of, is a lot of credible evidence that the reason why JFK was assassinated was because he was trying to stop Israel getting nuclear weapons. He was an opponent of their nuclear program. He didn’t want them getting nuclear weapons. And then look what happened to him.

 

And then Israel is not a signatory to the non-Proliferation Treaty. Pretty much every country in the world in the 60s and the 70s there was a decision made, okay, we’ve got to like stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons around the world. Obviously it was a bit of gate-keeping by the Soviet Union and the United States, but they were saying let’s stop, let’s shut down nuclear testing. This could be really bad for the environment. It slowed the proliferation of nuclear weapons and most of the countries in the world have signed up to it. Israel never signed it and Iran did. Iran has signed it.

 

So they’re trying to hold Iran to account for rules that they refuse to adhere to. It’s just insane! Like it’s the chutzpah of these kikes. So it isn’t necessary. Like from Israel’s standpoint they’re just greedy. They’re just like, they can see their enemy is in a weak position. They’ve knocked out a lot of its or kind of defeated groups like Hezbollah. They’ve knocked out Assad’s regime in Syria, which is an ally of Iran.

 

[30:17]

 

And so now they’re just trying to take a swing for the throat or they think they’ve got a chance. And Trump’s like:

 

“Fuck! Like, this is the last thing I need right now!”

 

He had like 5 million people in the streets protesting his presidency the other day. There’s the beanner anti-deportation riots happening. This happens. And then so many Trump allies, like Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon and so on, come out against Trump, against the war.

 

And a lot of the base, a lot of the people who support Trump, like what Tucker Carlson is saying, like what Steve Bannon is saying, like what even further Right commentators, people like Nick Fuentes, whatever, what these people are saying, Alex Jones. A lot of big commentators in the United States came out against this and the people were with them, particularly young people. So, it’s politically a disaster for Trump, but then also it’s geopolitically just like the last thing that they need right now.

 

And then, not to mention economically, like, if they went to war with Iran because of what it would do to oil prices and so on, it could completely fuck up the economy in a very serious way. So there’s just like this cascading set of crises that would be unleashed by it, which is why he was keen to just try and get it over and done with and move on and re-establish the status quo that previously existed. Because it’s kind of like a nightmare situation, no matter how much he loves Israel.

 

And I think that’s why what happened, happened. But it will probably flare up again before the end of the year because Israel is going to force the issue. Iran, I mean, they’re probably trying to make nuke secretly now. I saw a good article written by someone, I can’t remember who it was. I sent it to you like the other day.

 

Blair Cottrell: I know you did. I know which one you’re going to reference.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, like the one saying, obviously Kim Jong Un and the North Koreans have indicated, just build your nuke secretly and then test them and then flex your muscles because no one will touch you because North Korea’s got a bunch of nuclear weapons pointed at South Korea. Matter how much international condemnation there is of their regime, people just accept that it’s just, it exists and there’s nothing you can do about it. And that’s probably what Iran should do and what they’re probably going to try and do.

 

And apparently they’ve still got some of the reports that came out were saying that they’ve still got a lot of enriched uranium hidden somewhere, that they’ve still got reactors hidden, like hidden in other places that weren’t blown up, or that the Fordo site wasn’t destroyed properly, etc, etc.

 

So what happens in three or four months when the Israelis and other war hawks for war with Iran start leaking things to the press saying Iran are building nukes and they’ve rebuilt one of these nuclear sites or whatever? Like, Trump can call it fake news now, but, like, he probably will respond to that kind of pressure.

 

And so then what if, you know, Israel kick it off again, then what? Seems hard to imagine this situation would just magically go away.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you think jewish people have overplayed the Holocaust card? Because I noticed that Netanyahu, in his speech justifying his initial attack on Iran, he said something to the effect of, we can’t allow Iran to nuclear Holocaust us. And then I read an article that was published by Sky News from the, I believe, CEO, who was it? The CEO of the Australian jewish association or something? I think it’s probably just a guy at a desk. It’s nothing serious. But he was published by Sky News. And in the article, I’m pretty sure he mentions Holocaust like five or six times. And I’m thinking, and I didn’t actually read the article, I just wanted to count how many times he mentioned the Holocaust. And I’m thinking, am I the only one doing this, or am I the only one so worn down by the overuse of the Holocaust term because of the politics that I’ve been into? Or is everyone starting to feel this way? Is everybody starting to notice? I don’t know if this is something that people could relate to, but it’s just the justification for everything.

 

Remember that journalists, the Australian journalist, I think he was from ABC perhaps, who interviewed that spokesperson from Israel and said:

 

“So Israel is allowed to have nuclear warheads because Holocaust?”

 

And the spokesperson got really offended and actually walked out of the interview. He’s like, you’re being disrespectful. I’m not doing this interview, right?

 

So I can’t be the only one that’s noticing it. If even ABC journalists are noticing it. Like ABC journalists, I think, are notorious Leftists in Australia. People don’t like them very much. They’re generally very politically biased and even they’re sick of Israel. Jewish people just using Holocaust to justify everything and anything. What do you think? Do you think the general public, the population, do you think for them the Holocaust is starting to become a bit of an eye roll.

 

[35:14]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think you’re seeing it more with Leftists. They’re dismissing the Holocaust. Not that they’re not denying that it happened part. They’re dismissing it on the issue of Israel. I saw a clip from, I think it was Piers Morgan show and Piers Morgan has kind of been inviting on, he’s kind of seeking out controversy with his show. He’ll invite on people that will often debate the Israel-Palestine issue from both sides and he’ll try to interview like Andrew Tate or people like that because he’s going for clicks.

 

And anyway, I can’t remember who the jew was, but they had Anna Kasperian, I think her name is. She’s on the Young Turks program. She’s like Left leaning, like Bernie Sanders, supporting Democrat, but obviously she’s anti-Israel. And her rhetoric. I’ve noticed, I’ve seen quite a few clips from her and she’s a pretty popular commentator in the United States on the Left. Her rhetoric has gone to like full on like ZOG, like it’s a Zionist Occupied Government. Israel control our government. It’s not just, oh, these Christians and White supremacists hate brown people or whatever or these crazy Christians with this insane biblical theories about Israel. It’s like a direct, like Israel, the Mossad, they control our government. What’s going on with Jeffrey Epstein, you know, blah, blah, blah. Talking points that you would hear on the far-Right from people that we associate with. Right on that specific issue.

 

And anyway, the jew, she was debating about whether what’s happening in is in Gaza constitutes a genocide or something like that. He brought up the Holocaust and he’s saying this is not a real genocide. Real genocides are like the Holocaust. Like that’s a real genocide and that’s what happened to our people. And she was like, shut the fuck up! I’m sick of hearing about the Holocaust. How you guys just keep using that. I don’t care about the fucking Holocaust anymore. You’re doing a fucking genocide now! And that’s kind of interesting. You’re seeing that sentiment more from Leftists.

 

And then at the same time was a great exchange between Senator Gerard Rennick and some jew on Twitter that I posted a screenshot of the other day. The jew said:

 

“My family was wiped out in the Holocaust and for over 2,000 years my people were persecuted everywhere they went!”

 

Blah, blah, blah.

 

And then he just kind of shot back with:

 

“I have Celtic heritage. We’ve been persecuted for 2,000 years since the Romans touched us up. Did we go on about it, no, no one cares about your claims of 2,000 years of persecution!”

 

So it was nice to see Rennick fire back too.

 

And so you’re seeing more emboldening from people that are., … Because the anti-zionist, anti-Israel position is now becoming dominant. Basically people under the age of 40, people who get their politics primarily from a media diet of social media rather than mainstream media. Most people are anti-zionists, whether they’re Left-wing or Right-wing. It’s the only thing both sides can seemingly agree on at this point is fuck Israel basically. And yeah, so I think you’re onto something with that. I don’t think the Holocaust is really kind of maintaining the same kind of mystique that it once had.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, I mean, I’m seeing people who I know, clients, relatives of clients. Like I’ll be in the middle of a job and one of my clients will say:

 

“Oh, my brother just sent me this.”

 

Because we talk about politics in a light hearted way.

 

And it’s like a meme, you know the Jaws movie, how there’s a picture of the shark kind of looking up at the I think it’s a woman, or a man swimming on the surface of the water and someone’s just changed the shark to a giant nose and it’s jews instead of Jaws. And he’s like showing it to me, laughing at me, sorry, laughing with me about it. And I’m thinking, this wouldn’t have happened five or six years ago. This is the sort of thing you would only find on Telegram five or six years ago. Now it’s just everywhere and standard people are laughing about it. This kind of anti-semitic meme propaganda.

 

So I’m not sure where that’s going long term.

 

However, I did have a thought. I believe it was yesterday or the day before. I started thinking about why we were censored from X. And I shared my thoughts with you on this briefly as well yesterday, I think. To summarize, I said if all this stuff is allowed on X, all of this, like Nazi material, anti-semitic memes and so forth, then why are we banned? Like, what does that say?

 

Basically, I realised that it’s probably part of a deliberate system to ban the options, because regular people, it’s always effective for regular people to start changing their opinions in favour of what we stand for. Obviously that’s effective, but it’s only effective up to a certain point because people, at the end of the day, they need to do something with that opinion, they need someone to vote for or they need a group to join, they need a party to join, they need to start paying a membership for an organisation, they need to get involved or they need to at least vote for someone who has a bit of a plan. But if they remove all the people with a plan, if they delete the options, then it doesn’t matter what kind of content people are exposed to. If they can’t do anything with the opinions that content is forming in their minds, then it doesn’t, it just doesn’t matter. It doesn’t actually translate into real or affecting real political change.

 

And I think that’s the whole point behind the censorship, at least. What do you think? Because you’ve got people like Nick Fuentes, they’re still allowed on X and there’s other influences and podcasters and so forth. But that kind of ties into what I’m saying, because what are they doing to affect political change? They’re sitting in a studio just talking shit, which is fine. It doesn’t really solve any problems, does it? It doesn’t give people options.

 

But anyone who comes forward as a real option, representing a real new nationalist solution, a new political party that’s actually going to challenge the two party hamster wheel in your respective country or region, then you’re banned, then you’re censored in clusters, all of your colleagues were involved, everyone LinkedIn gets banned at the same time, usually at the request of the hamster wheel two party system in your respective region. What do you think about that? Do you reckon that’s what’s going on?

 

[41:55]

 

Joel Davis: No, definitely, I think, yeah. Basically everyone who tries to set up a proper organisation, a party in particular, that people can rally behind, we all got mass banned only when we started making noise that we’re going to start a political party. And I don’t think that’s a coincidence. It was partly because we were gaining kind of lift off with popular resonance and things like that as well.

 

But yeah, you notice a similar thing in Britain. I’ve seen a similar thing, you know, where like all the Patriotic Alternative guys all got banned all at once when they had some successful public action.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s the thing, they’re an option. It doesn’t matter what people’s opinions are if they can’t vote for someone or join some group that’s presenting themselves as an option, a solution. So if the options are banned, I think that’s the game. So everything just becomes content for the sake of content where you’re just scrolling your X feed and you’re seeing all these great funny, Nazi, anti-semitic memes, but there’s no one you can actually, you can laugh with your friends about it and stuff, but you can still only vote for Liberal or Labor. There’s still no known organisation that you can actually join because you don’t know about anything like that going on. Because everyone who represents anything like that gets censored instantly.

 

And I think that’s the way censorship will continue to pan out moving forward. Plenty of memes, plenty of content, but you’ll just be expected to sit there drooling on yourself, consuming that content, and there won’t actually be an option for you, despite your changing opinion.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so they don’t mind people talking about the problems, but they don’t want anyone putting forward an actual solution.

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s changed though? Because they used to hate people talking about the problems. You used to be banned instantly for even trying to bring the problem up.

 

So why suddenly don’t they care about people? It might be that they’ve realised people need that option. And without the option, it doesn’t actually matter what people talk about or what they consume.

 

Joel Davis: I think it’s just that the ability for the powers that be to impose the level of censorship that they were getting away with a few years ago has declined.

 

There’s been a resurgence in the value of freedom of speech. They overstepped the mark. They started going after in America in particular, where all these platforms are run out of, they started going after conservatives, like main mainline conservatives that are not even that radical.

 

I mean, they banned Trump from Twitter for fuck sake. They banned like a sitting president from the platform. So they overstepped the mark.

 

And so then there was a course correction where the American Right asserted freedom of speech and asserted itself on these platforms. Elon Musk buys Twitter. They set up Rumble. The kind of information space gets shifted. Zuckerberg also kind of personally shifted more to the Right.

 

And so this TikTok which has run out of China, there was a changing landscape that emerged that these sites were forced to adapt to.

 

But at the end of the day, when it comes to Australia or Europe or even I think in America where I saw examples of this, like I remember when the National Justice Party existed in the United States, like they all got banned and then you couldn’t even post, like at this, at this point, you can’t actually post our website on Twitter.

 

But I remember that that was true for their website as well. So they really target.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s your White Australia website, is that right?

 

Joel Davis: Correct. White Australia.org or WhiteAus.org, both are banned.

 

Blair Cottrell: What happens when that party actually gets registered? Well, then can it still be targeted for censorship to that degree? Where we can actually be posted on a public social media platform where there’s millions of Australians are joined up to that platform.

 

I mean, they talk about election interference through social media, but that’s exactly what these social media companies do against anyone, you know, right of centre. Usually the greatest election interference is happening amongst X staff right now.

 

But yeah, as I said, it ties back into the sort of perspective that I had over the last couple of days that the whole agenda is to ban the options, is to let people just talk about whatever they want now. To give people the illusion of freedom of speech. But nothing that they can actually do with that freedom of speech that’s going to affect the course of politics in their region. Sit there and watch some streamer, say some stuff about Hitler and wring your hands together and feel good inside about it, laugh about it, get excited about it, but then you still got to go vote for red or blue.

 

At the end of the day, that’s all there is. Anybody else presenting anything else, especially nationalistic, in essence, they get nuked, they get censored, and I think that’s the way the system will slug on forward into the future.

 

[47:11]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I can imagine like say we have World War III against China. I could imagine the system being allowing a lot of anti-Chinese racism to profligate online and in fact encouraging it and having propagandists that frame the war in terms most amenable to people like you and I actually support a war with China. I don’t support starting one, but I support it if it’s necessary. I support trying to win if it happens.

 

Blair Cottrell: Obviously.

 

Joel Davis: And so that could be a good opportunity for us. But like there’s going to be times where, like racism is valuable for many reasons. Like they obviously allowed people like us to run amok on the site in the lead up to the last American election because they’re trying to get Trump in and they knew that the more swastikas and sunrads that were posted on Twitter, there’d be more votes for Trump with young people and it worked. So they try to channel racism for their own ends. It’s the most powerful force in politics. So it doesn’t surprise me at all!

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s the most powerful force in the world. Racism. Racism is kind of the precondition for the development of all living things, isn’t it? It’s like woven into nature that surrounds us. Like, racism is probably the most foundational reality of this physical plane where we live. It’s the basis for all life. You don’t see any magpies running around pursuing crows because they want to be more diverse. But yeah, I can understand that. Racism is obvious, obviously leverage, but it’s done in a smart way.

 

I don’t like to believe that I’m just playing into the agenda of American, you know, political brains, though. I mean, all I was doing essentially on X was, I suppose, supporting and trying to legitimize. I mean, I’m part of an agenda as well. I’m part of a political agenda. It’s quite obvious the agenda I’m part of I like to think that I’m part of a good agenda. I’m trying to popularise and legitimize the White Australia movement. Right. I believe that there’s nothing wrong with being a White Australian.

 

And I think that could become a popular talking point in the future, especially when White Australians start becoming a minority or when things get so bad that you can’t go down to a shopping centre without potentially being raped or stabbed by a coloured migrant from Africa. Already we’re dawning on that reality now.

 

So the agenda I’m part of, because I’m part of it. I’m not directly linked in, I’m not an active member, but because I’m someone with a voice people listen to and I was creating content to try to translate what you guys were doing for the ordinary viewer. Well, that’s enough reason for me to also be taken out with the rest of the guys in censorship. You know, it’s frustrating because you know what? I won’t get into it. I’m not going to sook about censorship because if I was in control, I’d be censoring my enemies as well, straight up. I wouldn’t be giving people ideas.

 

Joel Davis: Need to figure out how to adapt. That’s why it’s important that people clip and re-upload the show, for example, and re-upload stuff that we post. When Blair posts a video on Telegram or whatever, re-upload it on other sites, enable our voice to keep getting out there regardless. That’s invaluable to circumvent the censorship that we’re under.

 

But also we just have to adapt. I think building the political party will give us strong standing to get back on a lot of these sites and to normalise ourselves in.

 

Blair Cottrell: The thing that irritates me most about it is just the whole concept of democracy. I would be more satisfied with this whole ordeal if the Australian government, the people within Australian government just came out and said:

 

“Hey, we’re not allowing these opinions. We’re censoring certain opinions. We’re banning certain political ideologies. This is not a democracy anymore!”

 

I’ll be like, okay, at least I know where I stand. But they keep parroting bullshit and trying to present themselves as something that they’re not. You know, that they stand for these democratic principles that they don’t stand for. So they just lie to your face. While in reality there’s like counterinsurgency departments that exist purely to harass and censor political dissidents in this Australian democracy. And that’s what frustrates me so much, because you do your best to obey the law. You do your best to hold to the principles that you were raised to believe in the principles of being fair, diplomatic, you know, principle of free speech, not being violent, all that kind of stuff. You observe all of those rules, social boundaries and laws, and you still just don’t get any rights. It’s like you still just get censored, harassed, de-banked, followed. You get police knocking on your door, asking you about the political party you might be joining in the future. You know, it’s just a complete Police State down here in Australia.

 

And so it just pisses me off that they can’t just admit that that’s what they are. I suppose Chris Minns is the one who’s come closest to actually admitting it. The premier of New South Wales, he said that, hey, we can’t basically, can’t have free speech in this multicultural paradise because it might hurt feelings, and we can’t have that. So free speech is cancelled. He didn’t say it exactly like that, but that’s basically what he believes. I can respect that more than what some of those other assholes passing themselves off as politicians, whatever people’s representatives are actually presenting themselves. As actually still pretend that they’re living in some sort of democracy or are members of a democracy. There’s nothing Democratic about Australia. I don’t know. Do you agree, Joel? What do you think?

 

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, they pretend that we live in a liberal democracy.

 

[53:22]

 

Blair Cottrell: Before you chime in, sorry, I know I just passed it to you and I’m starting again. The real test will be whether or not you guys can actually register your political party and participate in this so-called democracy. You know, that’s going to be the real, the big reveal as to how free and Democratic this so-called Australian democracy is because I’ve got a feeling they’re not going to let you do it.

 

But with Chris Minns right now, I brought up Chris Minns, he’s under a bit of fire right now, isn’t he? Because his staffers have been called to account for their role in imposing new Hate Speech laws. Basically tampering with Australian law to make it more difficult to criticise jewish people. Changing vilification laws specifically I think all on the back of the caravan hoax.

 

But now his staffers actually refuse to show up to the initial inquiry, which they’ve got to show up to it I think if they’re summoned.

 

So the arrogance of Chris Minns’ office, the staffers in Chris Minns’ office has led to what I think might be potential arrests. What’s going on with that, Joel? Have Chris Minns’ staff has been arrested or are they going to be arrested? Do they have to come to court? What’s the next step there?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so what happened is that the, we talked about it on the show last week that there was the Legislative Council which is like the Upper House of the state government, they are doing an inquiry, an official inquiry into what happened because obviously the day that they’re passing these laws it’s coming out that this thing is a hoax and they’re ramming them through anyway. And we talked about it at the time.

 

Not only was it a hoax, it was literally paid for by foreign state actors, almost definitely Israel basically paying bikies to conduct false flag anti-semitic terrorist attacks to create a pretext to change laws to make it illegal to criticise jews or make it illegal for White people to criticise any minority groups basically in Australia.

 

Anyway, the role that Chris Minns’ staff has played is being subject to the inquiry because they’re alleging that they knew about it well ahead of time and deliberately concealed the fact that it was a hoax in order to ram this stuff through and only allowed it to kind of come to the surface after that successfully secured a passage through the state like the Legislative Council. Now it’s kind of become interesting because basically they subpoenaed them. They said you got to come and answer our questions. They refused to show up. They all refused to show up.

 

Blair Cottrell: So now it literally didn’t show up. They didn’t refuse. They didn’t write ahead and say:

 

“Hey, we’re not coming!”

 

They just didn’t even answer. There was just empty seats on the day.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And they’re still refusing to show up. So why, if they’ve got nothing to hide, why can’t they show up? Why can’t the members elected by the people ask them some questions about what they were doing? What are they trying to hide? Obviously something.

 

Blair Cottrell: And you know, Chris Minns was interviewed about it recently and he said:

 

“Disappointing, concerning and massive overreach for his staffers to have to actually explain why they tampered with Australian law on the back of a hoax.”

 

It’s disappointing, concerning and massive overreach to be held accountable for changing Australian laws on the back of a hoax. That’s what he said. Not word for word, but that’s what he was alluding to in an interview with a journalist. Imagine that. Imagine believing that you’re free from any accountability, that you can just pass laws based on lies and hoaxes behind the back of the Australian people.

 

And then when you’re held to account for it, oh, you’re a victim. This is massive overreach. This is disappointing. How dare you ask me to be to answer your questions. That was Chris Minns’ reaction and he’s been having a dig at Mark Latham too. I saw in a recent clip. Why is that? What role is Mark Latham played?

 

Joel Davis: So, yeah, I’ll get to that.

 

The bottom line is that they have no respect for law. Like legally they have to show up and answer questions if they’ve been subpoenaed. And they technically within the power to issue arrest warrants. They haven’t been issued yet. I think these things are being stalled because of the political connections between Chris Minns and the people that are ultimately responsible for issuing the warrants or not so Chris Minns is basically just trying to shut it down through favours and back room deals and so on. So we’ll see if that’s successful.

 

But yeah, the Liberal Party in New South Wales, they refused because initially guys like Mark Latham and some of the other Right-wing minor party members in New South Wales, they tried to push a motion to repeal the laws entirely in light of the revelations. The Liberal Party refused to help them do that. But the Liberal Party then agreed to doing an inquiry because Liberal Party knew it would create a shitstorm for Labor. Like what is happening now, which would be good for them in the polls but obviously they’re in the pocket of the jews. They don’t want to actually repeal the laws. It’s a typical Liberal Party where they pretend to be on our side but really complicit.

 

[59:01]

 

But anyway, obviously Mark Latham is Independent. He was on the One Nation ticket. He got kicked out of One Nation for rampant homophobia, for basically. Which was quite funny. Remember we talked about it at the time on the show like two years ago when yeah. He quite graphically described how disgusting anal sex is in response to some homosexual politician that criticised him.

 

So anyway, Mark Latham, he hates poofters. He’s increasingly seeming to hate jews. Well not really but you know he did call out the jewish lobby. He said that Chris Minns was emboldening the jewish lobby, that the jewish lobby has too much power and so on. And Latham is one of the front men of this inquiry along with the other Right-wing minor party legislative councilmen who are trying to hold the government to account.

 

And so it’s a bit of political theatre. Chris Minns is accusing Mark Latham of advancing nefarious anti-semitic conspiracy theories and so on. And Mark Latham responded on Twitter this evening to a clip of that posted by Australians versus the Agenda declaring:

 

“Chris Minns is his bitch!”

 

So that was quite funny. I guess he’s out for blood. He’s trying to take Mins down. He sees this as a political opportunity to take the hatchet to the knee of Minns and his government.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, now’s the time to put the pressure on. Minns needs to be exposed. He needs to be embarrassed.

 

Anyway, anyone can put the pressure on him now, they should do it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, absolutely! And at Mark Latham he recently got lost a court case for damages against this homosexual. I think he was from the Greens, Alex Greenwich, I think he was the member for Sydney. So he was voted in by all the Oxford street faggots into that position, I presume. Yeah, a judgement was held that he has to pay him half a million dollars in damages for just simply stating that anal sex is disgusting! What the fuck kind of country do we live in where it costs half a million dollars to offend a homosexual by declaring anal sex is disgusting!

 

So I think Mark Latham has a bit of a kind of punished aura at the moment. You know, 20 years ago he was the head of the Labor Party. He almost became prime minister. Now he’s getting tossed out of One Nation for being a homophobe and, basically getting bankrupted by the system.

 

And so what has he got left to lose? He might as well take on the jews. He might as well do some damage to the ruling elite while he’s still got a position. So good on him. I think it’s funny. Mark Latham defended The Noticer when they did a notice, a hit piece saying that Notice The Noticer is a neo-Nazi psyop, basically. And, yeah, he’s kind of flirted more with, like our guys on Twitter. Mark Latham’s a bit of a cuck on race, or more than a bit of a cuck. He’s a cuck on race. He’s not a true nationalist, but he does seem like he’s somewhat of a real human being.

 

And it seems like he kind of tried to be an establishment politician and kind of was chewed up and spat out through a long [word unclear]

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe the reason Latham’s not an ethnic nationalist is because he spent all his time around White Parliamentarians and he just can’t stand you know, [chuckling] so it’s pretty hard to believe in your own race when that’s the extent of the experience that you’ve had with your own race is White Parliamentarians. I don’t envy his kind of company. There’s another way. Latham, if you’re watching this, there’s another way. It doesn’t have to be Parliament.

 

Joel Davis: Well, actually, I’ve seen Mark Latham Fed post on Twitter when he’s had a few beers. He’s basically said:

 

“We need a revolution to overthrow a corrupt ruling establishment.”

 

And so on.

 

Blair Cottrell: So he must be there. He must be almost there!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it does seem, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It takes some of us longer to get there, but there’s no shame in that.

 

Joel Davis: It does seem like Mark Latham is, yeah, he’s kind of become alienated. He tried to do it all the right way, supposedly according to the rules of the old paradigm. He was a true believer in social democracy or whatever.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what happens! That’s exactly what I was talking about before.

 

Joel Davis: Now he’s a jaded, old goat.

 

Blair Cottrell: He would be sort of feeling the same frustration that I feel I suppose where you’ve been raised to adhere to these principles, you do adhere to them.

 

But then the same people who kind of claim to uphold those principles and stand for those principles, they just chew you up and spit you out through all sorts of underhanded tactics. He called me once when I was at the height of my activism, because he had a show I can’t remember what it was called. You might remember he had like a podcast or something going on.

 

I can’t remember what it was called. But I was just working on a job site I think in Eltham. He rings me and he goes:

 

“Blair?”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Yes.”

 

And he goes:

 

“Mark Latham.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“G’ day mate, how can I help you?”

 

And he goes:

 

“Yeah, do you want to come on the show?”

 

I said:

 

“What show is that?”

 

And he said:

 

“My show.”

 

 

And I’m just like:

 

“Can I call you back? I’m just in the middle of something.”

 

Because I was on a scaffold like trying to repair this eaves that was like hanging past the scaffold and like I was kind of balancing. But he seemed to get offended. He’s just like:

 

“Yeah, right.”

 

And he just hung up on me. Then I tried to call him back and he didn’t answer. I don’t know, maybe he’s having a bad day. But that’s the extent of the interaction that I’ve had with Mark Latham. He’s got grumpy bad energy. He’s got the grumpy old bad energy he does.

 

[1:05:03]

 

Joel Davis: But he’s kind of like one of the few politicians that actually has like red blood in his veins. The only time I was in, I never spoke to him one on one, but anything resembling a conversational context was him just ranting at a conference I attended a few years ago, ranting about how Julia Gillard was a lesbian, how her so-called husband is a beard, that he’s a homosexual himself and that faggots have taken over Australian politics and lamenting this fact, which was quite humourous.

 

But what Latham tweeted last week that kind of provoked things was him saying two jews on Sky News saying, quote:

 

“The fake anti-semitism narrative must stop. Might be better to stop legislating when New South Wales police say none of those arrested have anti-semitic ideology. It was a con job set up by mobsters. Minns emboldened the jewish lobby and now it’s out of control.”

 

So we’re seeing Australian politicians call out the jews probably for the first time I can remember in my lifetime having multiple Australian politicians call out the jews directly. It does feel like a bit of a sea change. John Lawson posted a picture of Mark Latham standing over John Howard and aggressing with his hands and like getting in his face. And Latham’s replying to that, he’s replying to other nationalists. Someone said:

 

“Wait a minute, is New South Wales politics actually getting interesting for a change?”

 

And he said:

 

“We ride to the sound of the guns!”

 

So Latham’s on the war path. He doesn’t give a fuck anymore! It’s pretty funny. Funny thing, these old politicians that got chewed up and spat out by the major parties kind of like turn. And it’s the smartest politicians. I think Mark Latham and Gerard Rennick are the two highest IQ politicians in Australia and they’re the two that are calling out the jews. So what does that say?

 

Blair Cottrell: They might, Rennick and Latham might want to read the chapter of Mein Kampf where Hitler explains what happens to someone with real ability who goes into Parliament. Not just someone with real ability, but someone who genuinely holds to principles, who wants to stand up for their country. You should read what Hitler has to say about people like that that go into Parliament and how Parliament just basically becomes a mob to destroy them and get them out. Because in order to survive in Parliament, you need to be a rat without principles! You go into Parliament with principles, they all basically unite against you to get you out. That’s essentially what he says, but he says it much more articulately, he writes it much more articulately than that you can read it for yourself if you want.

 

Joel Davis: But I love, though, how there’s this emerging kind of renegade like cast in Australian politics, which was previously quite boring and monotonous. We don’t agree with them on everything, but people like Latham, people like Ralph Babet and a few of these other guys that are kind of at least causing problems for the system, and that’s kind of our aspiration, I guess in politics is to kind of join the team and push things even harder and faster and further. The kind of outsider team of Right-wing disturbers and chaos agents, just going Joker mode.

 

And I think Aussies love that kind of thing. Aussies love an underdog, Aussie’s love sticking it to the man, all that type of thing. So I think that would actually make politics interesting to have a kind of cast of colourful characters, you know, engaging in that more in the years going ahead. And I think that’s probably what we should aim for on the Right-wing of politics is to develop that because that could be the kind of catalyst for meaningful change.

 

Because as I said, as the reason why I was talking about international politics earlier is World War III is on the horizon. It might not be next week, but it is on the horizon. And when that moment arrives, all bets are off. It’s going to be a total reset of politics. And after World War III is over, is everyone going to be focused on World War II anymore? I don’t think so. there’s going to be a whole new World War for everyone, for the whole world order to be rebuilt around. And the animating myth is going to be all the horrible things that the chinks did to us and so on, rather than how bad the Holocaust was. It’s going to be a total reset of the collective psyche.

 

Blair Cottrell: We are in post World War II fairy tale land, aren’t we?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but it’s time’s almost up. Like there’s almost no one alive that remembers World War II at this point.

 

And by the time World War III is over, there’ll be barely anyone alive who remembers it, but everyone will be remembering what just happened. And what would have just happened is a race war against the Chinese, from our perspective. We’ve got 1.7 million chinks in our country. They’re all going to have to be put in camps or something worse. They’re not going to be able to be trustworthy members of Australian society anymore. There’s going to be a division by race. I think it’s going to be a total reset of our collective values. We’re going to pretend that men and women are totally equivalent at wartime when we actually have to go boots on the ground in the hundreds of thousands and fight to the death? I don’t think so. I think everyone’s going to come back to reality. They’re going to have to, they’re going to have no choice.

 

[1:10:34]

 

And so this confrontation with reality is coming.

 

And so our job is at the moment is to try and get ready for that. Because a lot of people are black pilled because they think that the current paradigm, this kind of monotonous slow grind is just going to continue on ad infinitum forever. Nothing’s ever going to happen, nothing’s ever going to change and we’re all just going to go out with a wimper. That’s not how history works. That’s not what’s going to happen. There’s going to be a major crisis. Everything is going to get blown up and remade. All of our values are going to get reset in the coming generations. And the work that we’re doing now is setting the table for that next generation to eat. Like we’re getting things ready for the paradigm shift which is on the horizon.

 

So people need to think like that if we have a movement established, even if it’s just tens of thousands or 100,000 men and we’re only getting a certain percentage of the vote and we have one or two guys elected or something, we’re going to at least be in a position to make the most of the coming crises, to grow and gain influence and gain a seat at the table. We want to have a seat at the table at World War 3 from the Australian political perspective. We want to have a seat at the table because in order to conduct World War 3, as we said before, what’s the most powerful force in politics? Right? Racism! That’s the main force you’re going to be able to channel in the Australian people to get them to fucking fight. And we are the arbiters of racism in our country. We are the vanguard!

 

So we’re going to take on a very different role in our society from just being these hated, despised, controversial outsiders. We’re going to end up becoming, we’re going to have a completely different relevance in society in the coming decades.

 

So we have to get ready, we have to get building and time is running out. We need to get serious. The next few years, it’s indeterminate, when all hell is going to break loose. But it’s going to happen soon.

 

So yeah, and the Anthony Albanese’s of the world are going to get wiped away. They’re not going to survive. We’re not going to be electing gay nerds into office after World War III. It’s going to call for a completely different kind of politician politics in general. The whole social attitude will change. The men who come back from World War III are going to come back embittered, but also entitled. They just went and fought to the death for the future of their nation. Are they going to come back and just allow it to be fucking given away to women in pants suits and fucking Indians? I don’t fucking think. So I don’t.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think when all of that comes about, you’re a little bit frozen up, by the way, I can hear you fine, but your camera is just all frozen up. And it’s not just for me because I’m noticing someone in the comments mentioned it too. But watch all the other races in Australia and probably throughout other Western countries, watch them all suddenly be on their best behaviour when that situation with China that probably will turn into a new World War eventually comes around, because suddenly White people will begin to become more conscious of the fact that they are White and that they have their own ethnic interests at stake. And outsiders are going to become easier to recognise. Because with that basic introduction of the anti-Chinese racism that you say will become kind of a central feature of life during that time, you know, naturally we’re going to start recognizing other people who aren’t like us as well more easily.

 

And all of those arrogant Indians that are currently boasting about taking over certain regions in our country, all the Africans who are on home invasion sprees and murdering doctors in the hills, happened just last year. A young 17 year old was just convicted of that a couple of days ago in Melbourne. All of these people, I think will suddenly be on their best behaviour, and it’s going to be an interesting shift, interesting change.

 

I’m not overly excited about anti-semitism being a mainstream thing again because I know that that’s how things pretty much always were throughout the history of Europe, at least before the Second World War, leading up to the Second World War. Basically every country was anti-semitic as a general rule. I mean, Christians just generally understood that jewish people weren’t to be trusted. There was an understanding that jewish people weren’t generally friendly to Christians. I think that was mostly prevalent throughout Europe. And I’m sure there were times in some countries where that consensus, that understanding kind of became less prevalent and then something would happen and people would realise the reality of the situation again, because you’ve got times where kings in England, for example, like oh, now the jews are okay. And then 15 years later they’re kicking the jews out again. But the jews know how to live. They would have necessary, or how should I put it? They would have essential blood memories. So they know how to survive in environments where anti-semitism is rife. So I wouldn’t get too excited about it.

 

But it is exciting to consider what the world would look like, what Australia would look like if White people redeveloped a bit of ethnic consciousness. That’s what I’m trying to say, in essence. And that’s really all that I want to see in my lifetime.

 

I mean, I don’t really want for much. I would just like to die having seen a country filled with my own people who know who they are and know who their enemy is, who are able to recognise outsiders and threats. So I feel like I’ve died having served some sort of purpose, you know.

 

[1:16:14]

 

Joel Davis: Sure. I think for Americans the jewish issue is more central because that’s the kind of centre of jewish power in the world is the United States. And they exercise a lot more influence over American political and cultural life.

 

Blair Cottrell: That Zionist, that Judeo-Christian mythology, whatever you want to call it’s kind of popular in America, isn’t it? Maybe not so much as it was 10 years ago, but there’s still that, yeah, God’s chosen people thing going on.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, obviously there’s that. But even beyond that, just jews occupy a very prominent role in American life. Like, even though they’re like 3% of the population, they’re massively over-represented in media.

 

So if you’re watching podcasts, like there was the Leather Apron Club videos where he went through all the big podcasts, like all the big political podcasts, Tim pool, Joe Rogan, etc, etc. And he was going through them all and it was like a third plus of the guests on all these podcasts were jewish. Even though they’re only 3% of the population, they’re over-represented in the kind of tastemaking culture setting domains.

 

And so they have an outsized influence on American culture and political life, not to mention all the money that they’re putting in. And this is true on the Left-wing and the Right. It’s not just like the religious Zionists or whatever. Jews are more influential probably on the Left than on the Right in America in many ways, because just of how the majority of them are Leftists in the United States.

 

So that’s a big deal for Americans. And also primarily it’s the American military that’s getting dragged in to fight Zionist wars and so on. Like, we get kind of dragged along, but it’s kind of a secondary thing for us. It’s more primary for them. So it’s a more prominent issue for them.

 

But the reason why we did The jews Hate Freedom protest before Christmas last year, it wasn’t just because of the topical nature of that issue, which obviously it was primarily about, but it was because I think that’s the best way to frame the jewish problem to Australians in the current year, which is what is the jewish lobby primarily pushing for in Australia? The main thing that it’s pushing for always is hate speech legislation. And more and more attacks on our freedom of speech. Every single time anything happens, jews come out into the media and demand more arrests, more laws passed and so on. They want to shut us down. And Australians value freedom, and so they don’t appreciate this small minority trying to take away the freedoms of the rest of us because of their own hysteria and their own lack of ability to take criticism.

 

So I think that’s the strong frame and I think it’s a strong frame for Americans as well, I mean, there’s jews clamouring in the United States to take away their freedoms as well. And there’s nothing, there’s probably no value that Americans hold more dear than liberty.

 

So the kind of jews versus freedom framing I think is the best framing. You know, last week I criticised Sam Hyde for going on a podcast and trying to frame the problem with jews as:

 

“Well, look at the genocide that they’re doing in Palestine. Do you want to pay for that with your tax dollars?”

 

And it’s like, that’s probably convincing to like Leftists who sympathize with browns. But like, we should be talking about what jews are doing to us! Like how we are negatively affected by jewish institutional behaviour, not other groups. You know, who gives a shit about Palestinians ultimately, other than bleeding Leftists, not that many people or like Muslims, but like, who does the average patriotic White Australian care about themselves? Ourselves. So it needs to be framed in those terms. And you know, a lot of the problems that are occurring in Australia, they don’t boil down to jews. Like the problems with mass immigration and so on. Jews have played a leading role in advancing mass immigration and multiculturalism and so on. But it’s not just the jews.

 

Like, it’s a coalition of different groups, whether it be the housing industry, whether it be ideological Leftists and globalists, whether it be other, like non-White minority groups in their lobbying efforts or voting blocs or whatever. There’s a coalescence of anti-White forces in our society.

 

But on the issue of free speech, jews are playing a massively outsized and prominent role in attacking it. So on the one hand they try to portray themselves as:

 

“Oh, but you know, Israel’s a free liberal democracy. And if you oppose Israel, you’re allying yourself with these communists and Muslims who hate freedom and liberalism.”

 

And so you’re like some backwards, you know, fascist or something. That’s how they frame things. But it’s ridiculous! That’s such a weak frame. We need to smash through that framework and say:

 

“No, we’re on the side of freedom. You’re on the side of tyranny!”

 

If you’re not doing anything wrong, if the jewish role in society isn’t a problem, if what Israel’s doing isn’t a problem, why can’t we talk about it? Why can’t you just sit down and debate it and defend your position openly?

 

Blair Cottrell: Don’t you care about the Holocaust, Joel?

 

So what you’re saying in essence is anti-semitism is equivalent to the highest knowledge.

 

Joel Davis: What do you mean by that?

 

[1:21:49]

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m sort of like borrowing a Christian. I don’t know if it’s a Christian phrase or it’s actually from the Bible, says:

 

“Fear of God is equivalent to the highest knowledge.”

 

It’s true in religion maybe, but in politics anti-semitism is equivalent to the highest knowledge. You would think that you go into life thinking that any kind of prejudice any kind of stereotyping a person is just prejudice. And you’re not going to give yourself to that kind of brutal nature of thought.

 

But then the more you actually pay attention, you realise there’s a good reason for stereotypes, ethnic stereotypes in particular, and that there’s anti-semitism for a reason. It’s not just because people are idiots. It’s because people have observed the reality of a nature of a certain group of people for a very long time. [chuckling] It’s like that people continue to engage in certain practices, continue to behave in a certain way which leads other people to be somewhat hostile to them for their own purposes, which is usually a natural response.

 

So I think in summary, you could say that anti-semitism is the result of a lot of acquired knowledge. It’s not just some knee jerk reaction springing from prejudice or bigotry, as they try to frame it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the problems associated with the jewish community and its influence over our society, it actually requires like careful study and analysis. It’s not something which is like directly evident. I think people who have a more superficial view of society, they tend to not have very strong opinions on jews. They’ll be more upset at other groups that are more prominent and public facing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you hear? Well, that’s the point, isn’t it? That’s probably one of the reason the jewish people aren’t so prominent and public facing.

 

Joel Davis: I think a we’ve talked about on the show before. I think it’s a big mistake for them. They’re shooting themselves in the foot. They should shut up and retreat into the background. If they truly aren’t doing anything wrong, shut up and retreat into the background and allow us to have our race war with the Indians and the Chinese and the Muslims and all these other groups and retreat into the background and pretend to be on whichever side is winning, you know. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: I do like the way like the standard jewish merchant that I’ve had dealings with in construction in the past. I do like the way they don’t flaunt their wealth. It’s one thing that the standard average jewish character from the southeast region of Melbourne, like Malvern, Elston, Wick regions, you would never know that they were wealthy. But they do tend to have access to a great deal of wealth. Like they’ll own big car parks in the city, high rise hotel buildings or family members of theirs will own that stuff and they’ll have shares in it kind of thing. But they’ll drive the kind of cars, they’ll drive a Camry and they’ll be wearing tracksuit pants and a T-shirt from Kmart or just some button up polo from Kmart. You know, they’re unshaven sometimes you don’t, you would never know. These are the way a lot of the jewish merchants around Melbourne operate, operate. And I kind of admire that because it at least is an expression of ego control to some extent.

 

Because when you think about it, the people who wear the big fat watches and lots of jewelry and drive around in like $200,000 Maseratis, what’s the point of that? What is the point in flaunting your wealth? What’s the point in wasting money on that shit in the first place? Like, what are you actually trying to achieve? Like:

 

“Look at me, I’m really rich and special!”

 

Isn’t that just ego fragility? Just that you’re trying to draw attention to yourself.

 

Joel Davis: So if you’re a billionaire Blair, you’re telling me you wouldn’t buy a fast car?

 

Blair Cottrell: I definitely wouldn’t. I would buy a nice Tiguan. I would buy a very nice Volkswagen Tiguan, because they’re a good reliable car and I would like a nice new, new sort of updated.

 

Joel Davis: I’d buy an Aston Martin. I’d buy an Aston Martin.

 

Blair Cottrell: You don’t want to be driving around in a car like that in the current climate though. You’re just going to, it’s probably just going to get stolen by Africans. I’m not saying that you shouldn’t buy nice things because they’ll be stolen by Africans.

 

What I’m saying is, …

 

Joel Davis: Put it in the garage! How they’re going to get?

 

Blair Cottrell: But why do you need it? Like this is what I’m talking about.

 

Joel Davis: I want to do 240km an hour down the highway!

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, but when are you going to do that? In the middle of the night when the coppers aren’t going to catch you.

 

Joel Davis: I’m doing 240. Good luck catching me. Plus, I got enough money to pay the tickets if I’m a billionaire.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right, [chuckling] but you’re gonna get sick of that eventually. I mean, okay, that’s a hobby. You’re talking about a hobby, but I’m talking about why would you, like, walk around in lots of gold chains, jewelry, …

 

Joel Davis: I wouldn’t walk around in gold chains.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like express your wealth? Like, what’s the point?

 

Joel Davis: I just would like to drive a ridiculously fast car, ridiculously fast. Because it’s fun.

 

Blair Cottrell: I get it. But again, we’re just talking about hobbies. If you had a lot of money, you wouldn’t. If you had a lot of, …

 

Joel Davis: I think jews are too neurotic, like:

 

“Oh, I’m gonna crash!”

 

Like, they wouldn’t even have the balls to go 240, you know?

 

[1:27:32]

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I gotta admit, I don’t know. I mean, what’s the point in driving 240 or just for the thrill rush. Man! What I’m saying though, is I think the jews, not all of them, obviously, but the majority of them, they must be raised this way. Or maybe it’s just part of their genetic nature. They do seem to have good outward ego control where they don’t flaunt their wealth.

 

But it’s probably all part of their subversive demeanour. Right? So you don’t really expect much from them. It is very true that you never really expect much from jewish people. When you deal with them on an individual basis, they always seem kind of nervous and skittish and you kind of feel sorry for them. That’s the impact they’ve always had on me. You kind of feel sorry for them and so you’re extra nice to them, because this is long before I ever really knew what I knew about jews. So I do admire that one element of their disposition, which is they don’t tip, they don’t tend to flaunt their wealth. And they’re some of the wealthiest people you’ll ever work with or for, if you’re in whatever industry that you’re in where you might come across them.

 

Joel Davis: I think the main thing to admire about them is that they invest a lot of their wealth in the advancement of their community rather than just the advancement of themselves as individuals.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s true.

 

Joel Davis: There are a lot of Anglo millionaires and billionaires, like multi, multi-millionaires and billionaires in this country who don’t put one single dollar into the advancement of White Australia, which is why the country is being stolen from us!

 

The jews are 0.4% of the population and their lobby is so aggressive and powerful because they pay for it. They put their community first as a group. And you know, meanwhile a lot of our richest people are fundamentally making money off our replacement. Maybe they’re working in industries that benefit from cheap non-White labour or if they’re in housing construction, they’re benefiting from mass immigration or whatever.

 

Blair Cottrell: And it makes your eye roll thinking about your parents, doesn’t it? I mean, I love my parents, but the standard sort of White Boomer parents, all they really think about is their retirement, is retiring comfortably and spending all the money or wealth that they’ve generated throughout their lifetime on themselves at the end of their lives. Which people watching this might think, good on them.

 

I mean, that’s the phrase they use in Australia:

 

“Oh, good on them. They should be able to do that. They’ve worked hard their whole lives!”

 

Yeah, I get it.

 

But when you contrast that kind of decision making process with what the jews are doing, with what the Chinese are doing, with what pretty much every other race in this country are doing, it’s kind of retarded to just blow all the wealth that you have generated through your working life on yourself and Martinis and cruises and fine dining before you die while your children have to inherit the mess that you fucking leave behind! I mean, you got to admit that’s pretty retarded, right.

 

I think being a bit more collectivist and having a little bit more foresight, generational foresight with the money that you make in your life, if you’re a Boomer, might serve your nation to some extent.

 

And that’s right, someone says in the comments:

 

“They taught our people to think as individuals.”

 

That’s the problem. And the Boomers can be really bad for that. Like I’m not an anti-boomer sort of guy. I’m a bit of a Boomer appreciater it in a lot of ways, because they do work really hard. They’re an industrious people. They’re always trying to fix things. They don’t like to relax, they’re always working. But they’ve definitely been geared to think on individual basis and that’s why all they seem to care about is their retirement.

 

Joel Davis: The Strausshowe generational theory predicts that Boomers and Gen-X’s will be more individualistic because Boomers grew up at a time of great prosperity. They grew up at the time after World War II, where you know, society was on high, institutions were working incredibly well. There were incredible opportunities. They’re highly idealistic generation that challenged spiritually the values of the old order because there was no crisis for them to really, like, confront in their lifetime. So their politics or their cultural involvement primarily became one of spiritual dissatisfaction.

 

Then you have the Gen-X’s who are like more jaded individualists, where the Boomers are idealistic individualists who want freedom and liberation and all this kind of stuff. And so they’re very focused on how they can enjoy their retirement and waste all their money on garbage rather than thinking about legacy.

 

Gen-X’s raised with very careless parents. There they were raised as kind of like a forgotten generation. They’re incredibly nihilistic and cynical because they were raised after the Boomers who had this great idealistic project that totally failed, and they perceived that. So Gen-X’s think it’s all bullshit! There’s nothing you can do to change the system. Just, you know, advance yourself as an individual as much as possible. Just make money and do what you got to do. There’s no higher purpose or meaning to society or life.

 

And so these are the two generations that are kind of running the show at the moment because they’re the ones with the wealth and the power and the influence. And they’re very individualistic for two kind of different reasons in terms of polarity.

 

But what the this generational theory predicts is that for Millennials, that we’re actually, … And by Millennials, they. Their cut-off point for Millennials is later than what’s most commonly understood. So older Zoomers are included in this.

 

[1:33:20]

 

Basically, if you’re an adult now, if you’re at least over the age of 21, you kind of fall in this category. For our generation, we’re a lot more collectivist because we were raised at a time of decline. Society has been declining. The generation that came before us were nihilistic. They didn’t really believe in anything.

 

And so we’re not really kind of reacting to a false idealism. Instead, we’re responding to a kind of society of excessive individualism, excessive nihilism, and instead have a kind of inclination to form for collective solutions rather than individualistic solutions. So where, like Gen-Xers say:

 

“Oh, well, you got no chance in changing the system. Just try and make money and be successful as an individual.”

 

Millennials tend to be more supportive of collective political solutions to our problems and say:

 

“Well, how can I as an individual succeed in a system like this?”

 

And so Millennials are far more predisposed to socialist economic policies, for example, and more collectivist political ideologies, whether it be on the Left or the Right, than previous generations.

 

So as we kind of ascend and become take over the system in the coming generational cycle, because we’ll become the older people that are actually in charge of the government and in charge of everything, basically, our values will start to get imposed on society and society will move in that direction.

 

So that’s another reason why I think the future of the Australian Right-wing is not going to be talking, it’s not going to be promoting conservative libertarian style policies around:

 

“We’ve got to cut taxes and we’ve got to reduce the national debt and people need to work harder!”

 

And all this kind of stuff. What’s going to motivate Millennials in the political space is redistributing wealth to our generation, giving us free stuff, giving us basically making up for the fact that wealth has been hoarded into the other generations, making up and kind of restructuring the economy. Collective solutions to individual problems rather than individual solutions to collective problems, which is predominant within Generation X. Like, Generation X thought that Fight Club was like the coolest movie ever, because Fight Club was all like:

 

“Society sucks, man! Let’s just go and like punch on in a garage and like blow buildings up and like have sex that’ll be awesome and get drunk.”

 

Whereas, like, they thought Nirvana was like the greatest band ever because they were like:

 

“Everything sucks!”

 

And they’re like:

 

“Whoa, that’s so deep!”

 

Whereas, like, Millennials are like, they don’t resonate with that kind of thing. Instead, Millennials are interested in, as I said, idealistic collective solutions, like, who is responsible on the collective level? How can we solve it on the collective level? Which makes sense why nationalism would resurge and socialism would resurge simultaneously within our generation.

 

So the future of Right-wing politics is a kind of nationalist Right-wing socialism. It’s not going to be small government, it’s not going to be doubling down individualism. Everyone is sick of individualism. Young people don’t want individualism. Young people don’t want to be told:

 

“Pull yourself up by your bootstraps, go talk to her!”

 

And all that kind of advice:

 

“Get it done!”

 

Blair Cottrell: The problem with individualism is you get too much of yourself under some sort of individualism or individualistic thought process system. You get too much of yourself and you get bored with it. You know we’ve had individualism, and look where it’s led individuals. Everyone’s on a plethora of script meds, sitting at home watching Netflix by themselves, paying off a mortgage by themselves, and just living in there in their honeycomb cell.

 

But I’ve got to bounce, man! I’ve got to bounce because I’ve got a really early start. I’ve got to get to bed.

 

Joel Davis: Can we do our four Superchats?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, if we’ve only got four, that’s fine. Yeah. Sorry, guys, if I’m sort of ending it abruptly, but I’m worried I won’t sleep tonight. And if I don’t sleep, I’m gonna have a really hard time tomorrow. I’ve got a bit of traveling to do tomorrow.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I was gonna get you to react to that Indian video, but fuck it! We’ll do it another time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I already watched it. The guy on your channel saying that:

 

“Hey, we’re taking over everything and we’re gonna marry your sons and daughters.”

 

Or something like that.

 

Basically, he was almost boasting that he was going to end up with like, all the Indians are going to get everyone’s sloppy seconds:

 

“You’re all going to get divorced, and then your divorced wives are going to get with us!”

 

He goes:

 

“Every Indian guy I know is with someone who’s not Indian!”

 

And I’m thinking, that’s not my experience. Every Indian I know is with an Indian. Well, it’s usually Indian men walking around in-groups looking for some girl to sexually assault. [chuckling]

 

But, yeah, it’s just your take on it that you posted on Telegram was perfect when you said that basically, what the guy is relishing in is the fact that in his mind, White Australians are destined just to end up in the same ethnic situation that he’s in.

 

Joel Davis: Well, you’re downbred into the genetic slop that he is.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was trying to say, in a way, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s his, like, ideal revenge is that:

 

“Oh, yeah, you think we smell and you think we’re disgusting and you think we’re a slave cast of Uber drivers. Well, guess what your grandkids are going to be half Indian Uber drivers, too, and you’re going to be down here in the fucking muck with us!”

 

Blair Cottrell: And there is a real vengeance, there is a real revenge sentiment amongst some of the Indians nowadays, I’ve noticed, isn’t there? Or just people who are responding to any sort of White nationalist talking point on TikTok or something like that you can see in their eyes, hear in their voice and you know, in their words it’s quite obvious that’s like they want vengeance. They want vengeance that they’re not White! They’re irritated that they’re not White! They’re irritated that White people are realizing that they’re White, recognizing the significance of that and starting to talk about it.

 

And all of these people are vengeful as a result! Let’s like, they don’t want that to happen. Obviously, it’s an existential thing. They’re worried they’re going to be sent back to their own countries, maybe.

 

[1:40:00]

 

Joel Davis: I saw a thread on Twitter by this Indian who posted. He said:

 

“Joel Davis, who hates Indians, well, he’s Irish and the Irish aren’t even White!”

 

And he thinks that he, … Anyway, I’m not even Irish, by the way. Full disclosure, I’m Scottish and English mixed together. Yeah, he was saying that apparently I’m Irish and then posted one of these those old like physiognomy charts from like the early 20th century where it showed like how the Irish kind of looked like niggers and being like basically, just like it was funny.

 

But then like, you’re not even White, you’re Irish. It’s like you’re a fucking pajeet. Like, even if I was Irish, you’re a pajeet! Like their main insult is like:

 

“Yeah, well you’re also brown. Like, you’re also a piece of shit! Like we’re both pieces of shit together!”

 

It’s not even like elevating himself up. It’s just dragging you down. It’s like when homosexuals try to like insinuate that you don’t like them because you’re secretly gay. It’s like, would that be insulting? Would me being a homosexual be something that’s disgusting and gross? Well, actually, I agree! It would be disgusting and gross if I was a homosexual. Interesting that you say that.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve said it before. It’s hard to be offended by, it’s probably because you can’t say anything to a White guy to a reasonably well bred White guy, which I imagine. Well, I like to think that you and I are reasonably well bred White men. What can you say to us? Like that’s a racial slur that’s actually going to irritate us. What can you actually say? There’s nothing! What am I going to get offended by? What are you going to call me Casper or pasty or something? Like, okay, I’m fine with that. There’s just nothing that can be said that’s going to like, suddenly make me realise that I belong to an ethnic group that I despise or I’m trying to distract myself from. I’m not trying to distract myself from my ethnic identity. You can only get offended if you’re actually not proud of who you are. If someone’s like using a racial slur, that’s the only reason you could be offended.

 

But yeah, like you said, there’s always just efforts to drag you down with these people. Let’s move on though, because I’m getting to the point where like, I slept three hours last night. I don’t even know how I’m running, like, how I’m still awake for some reason. I’m still going.

 

But yeah, I’m on three hours and I’m only going to get five if I go to bed right now. So we need to get through these Superchats.

 

Joel Davis: Well How’s it Going, said:

 

“Are you guys aware of the Australian band called Black Magic SS? They lean heavy on National Socialist imagery and themes.”

 

I am aware of Black Magic SS. They’re a doom metal outfit. And yeah, I think they’re pretty cool! Have you heard of them?

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. I’ve been to some gigs where bands like that have played. Are they Black Metal? I’m imagining they’re black.

 

Joel Davis: No, no, they’re not Black Metal. They’re like Doom Metal. They sound kind of like imagine if Black Sabbath was less pop sensible and kind of racist. More like mystique.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know if I’ve seen them. I don’t think I have. I’ve seen some Black Metal bands that are into that.

 

Joel Davis: Like, yeah, obviously there’s heaps of NS Black Metal bands, but yeah, no, they’re not Black Metal.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, let’s check them out.

 

Joel Davis: I think they’re Australian too, from memory

 

Blair Cottrell: Wiggle Do sends through $10. Thanks very much. He said:

 

“Lots of people want to be more racist than Hitler in NS circles. Where do you stand on Nuremberg Laws and mixed races? How do you draw the line between White and non-White?”

 

I think Joel’s mentioned this before in previous streams. It would come down to like organisational policy, I think, and different organisations would have different policies on that question. But I’m pretty sure the boys, Joel and the guys have their own policy on that, don’t you?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So it depends on the genetic distance. So like, if you have like trace amounts of like blood black, like African ancestry or Aboriginal ancestry. Less percentage of that can be tolerated relative to if you have like, I don’t know, like trace amounts of like Middle Eastern ancestry or Asiatic kind of ancestries because they’re less genetically different. So it’s dependent on the what the form of blood pollution, what percentage can be allowed. The Nuremberg Laws were primarily just about jews. And in my opinion they were if anything a little bit too lenient. So does that make me more racist than Hitler if I mean I’m Australian?

 

Rigo Weber said:

 

“Does the NSN have monetary incentives for White families to have more children? I think this should be a high priority for the NSN culture to develop, especially to replace all the mass deported.”

 

What do you mean? Do we within our own organisation pay people to breed? No! We don’t pay people to breed within the organisation. We do have so many people from, …

 

[1:45:14]

 

Blair Cottrell: What I can see there’s a lot of encouragement to breed.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Everyone’s having families. The reason why people aren’t having families is not so much about monetary incentives, it’s more about culture. If you have a culture that celebrates motherhood and you’re in a group of friends and associates where motherhood is valued and having children is valued, then the women pick up on that signal and go:

 

“You know what, I want to have kids too. I don’t want to be like some like sterile ageing, you know, wench, surrounded by all these fertile young women with all these babies hanging off their titties, you know, growing the next generation.”

 

So you know, if you develop a pronatalist culture, it kind of flows.

 

But in terms of like government policy, obviously when we put the political party together, one of our policies is going to be paying people to be carers for their own children. So like right now you have a situation where if you say you have a two year old, you’re a mother, you want to go back to work, the taxpayer, through the government, will give you a childcare rebate so the taxpayer will pay some Filipino immigrant to look after your kid in some child care facility surrounded by freaks and non-Whites and potentially pedos so that you can go and work because otherwise you wouldn’t be able to afford to work basically because you can’t even afford to pay child care costs for your own kid. That’s ridiculous!

 

But then if you’re a stay at home mom, you get nothing. It’s a completely perverse incentive. So what we’re going to do is reverse it and pay, fuck the child care rebate. If you want to go and work, you got to figure out who’s going to look after your kids if you can’t.

 

But if you’re going to look after your own kids, the society should pay you. We a collapsed birth rate, we need to have more White babies, we need to have more young Australian babies. And so we’ve got to make it economically viable for young families to have children.

 

So that’s going to be one of our signature policies. I think it’ll be very popular. I think women will like it. I think young men will like it too, because it takes the pressure off them too. If your missus is getting paid big money to raise your kids well, then raising a family on a single income becomes possible again. Say she’s getting 70, 80 grand a year from Centrelink and then you’re out making 100 grand a year or whatever. Now you’ve got a decent income so you can make a life for yourself.

 

Catenaria said:

 

“What are your thoughts on human rights? The right to life, liberty, security, freedom of speech, assembly and expression. Are they inherent and universal? Should they be protected?”

 

I don’t believe human rights exist. They are not inherent, they’re not universal, they’re social constructs. Should we construct them within our societies is a different question. I think within White societies, the maximum amount of freedom that can be apportioned to your population without compromising the security of your nation, should be afforded.

 

So I don’t think we should give freedom to communists, to traitor elements within the society, to, or definitely not to foreigners, alien foreign interests in our society, trying to subvert it and undermine it. But I think normal White people should have freedom of speech and assembly and expression. Absolutely!

 

So, yeah, but they’re social constructs, which means that there’s nothing universal inherent about them. They were dreamt up in the 20th century. No one ever thought they existed before then, because they don’t. They’re just phantasms of the mind. They’re ideological constructs, they have no metaphysical basis.

 

Blair Cottrell: Obviously, that’s true. But perhaps the essence of the question is, would you maintain any sort of semblance of human rights, like, let’s say you get everything you want and you’ve got a White ethno-state. Would you keep the concept of human rights, like, woven into Australian law, or would you?

 

Joel Davis: Not human rights. Not human rights. But I think having rights for the Australian people, specifically the White Australian People, they should have rights. We should guarantee their rights. But enemies of the nation and foreign alien interests should not have rights. Fuck you! Go create your own country somewhere else and get them to give you rights. Our government is responsible for securing the rights of our people, not anybody else. And we could make. And we could respect the rights of like all White people, let’s say with got cousin nations around the world and we can respect their rights and they would respect our rights and things like that. But it’s a construct, it’s a decision, it’s not an absolute!

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d be more concerned with conducting myself with dignity and strength rather than arbitrary concepts. Abstract concepts like rights to life, liberty, freedom of speech. These are all very, I don’t know, you’ve got to understand that when you have concepts like that that are available to everyone in a specific country, then that country becomes receptive to external threats, subversion. People are going to use those rights against you. They’re going to get into your country and they’re going to use that shit against you. So that’s a problem. There’s a bit to unpack there.

 

But this is the kind of thing that you sit around a table with some other very learnt people and you discuss where the boundaries, where you’re going to draw the line with stuff like this, and how you’re actually going to define your state form. Because I don’t like concepts like the ones that were enshrined into the basis of Australian democracy. You know, the ones I grew up with, as I explained earlier in the stream. Because they’re all bullshit! And they’re just used by enemies of our country to subvert and exploit our country and extract the wealth generated by the Labor in our country and send it overseas and you know, get up to all sorts of mischief in the process. To the extent where our children. The greatest thing our children contend with in public schools is:

 

“What gender am I?”

 

You know, all of this has been the result of freedom of expression and human rights and stuff like that. Right. That’s just opened the door for all manner of subversives to come into this country and work their bullshit magics. So like I don’t go for that kind of stuff. But I do believe in honour, dignity, being fair. I believe in harsh punishments, but fair punishments nonetheless. I believe in consequences, that kind of thing. But as I said, there’s a lot to unpack here, isn’t there?

 

[1:52:21]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I also believe that thinking of rights only at the level of the individual is wrong. I think groups have rights if we’re going, … And I don’t think rights exist metaphysically. I think they’re constructs.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, they don’t! But that’s why I said you need to sit around a table and like, determine what the rights are.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! But I think groups need to have rights too. When we sit down and we say:

 

“Okay, well, individuals want to have rights.”

 

Okay, but groups need to have rights. So the nation needs to have rights too. The nation needs to be able to say:

 

“Well, this is what the nation needs in order to survive and to maintain itself. And those rights need to be respected.”

 

And in some respects they impair upon individual rights. So like I wouldn’t in a kind of, in the ethno-state, normal, healthy White people, if you want to marry another normal, normal, healthy member of the opposite sex, okay. I don’t think we should be like micromanaging that. I know there’s some eugenics spergs who think that, but I think that’s kind of really unromantic and inhumane. So okay, but then like, if you fall in love with like, I don’t know, an African woman. No! Like, we’re not going to allow that. That’s disgusting! Just like if you fall in love with your dog and you want to marry your dog. No, we’re not going to allow that either. That’s fucking disgusting!

 

Blair Cottrell: So I’m sure the African women aren’t akin to dogs? You’re talking about an actual animal versus a different, …

 

Joel Davis: Rather have a dog in my house, to be honest, than a fucking African woman.

 

Blair Cottrell: So. [chuckling] Yeah, what did you say before that? What was unromantic or inhumane? Oh, like you gave an example.

 

Joel Davis: Allowing free healthy White people to marry whatever member of the opposite sex they want to marry. I said:

 

“I think restricting that too much is inhumane, unromantic.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, so you’re a romantic?

 

Joel Davis: We had like eugenics doing the like, nerd calculations on the genetics and we’re like:

 

“Computer says you’ve got to like marry this person!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Well let’s create a scenario somewhere in the middle. Let’s say that a White guy wants to marry Arab woman.

 

Joel Davis: Well, no! Because you’re violating the rights of the White Australian nation to perpetuate itself. You’re poisoning the blood of our nation. It’s not about you.

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re interfering with free will. And you got to understand when you ban something, you kind of make it in a taboo way more desirable to the darker nature of people. So you got to be careful with outright banning shit like that! You’ve got to discourage it and put social pressure on them.

 

Joel Davis: You know it used to be illegal in Australia, right. You know, miscegenation, like mixed race marriages used to be illegal.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right, right, I get that. But I think it would be more effective if, …

 

Joel Davis: Does everyone find it super desirable to, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Australian society right now, the way it is right now, and you just outright ban miscegenation now, I don’t know, I think you’d almost make it even more taboo. And you know when you tell a child don’t do something, you ban a child from like watching a certain TV show for example, that they kind of want to watch, then going to try harder to watch it.

 

Joel Davis: Well, you can do it, but you can move to their country and do it. I mean we want to kick them out of our country. So how are we going to let you bring in non-Whites into our country just because you want to marry them? If you want to marry them, you’re going to go to their country and marry them. But we’re not bringing in a bunch of Filipino wives into Australia and creating all these hapa franken children. Go to the Philippines if you want to.

 

Blair Cottrell: I get it. Again, at the very least, I don’t want to say illusion, but the idea of free will I think is still an important thing, because you need to show White people respect, they need to believe they have free will. I think a necessary amount of social pressure can be put on people.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but if you want rights, like if you want the nation to give you rights, you also have to respect the nation’s rights. So if you’re going to violate the nation with your rights, why should the nation continue to defend your rights? Doesn’t make any sense. It’s not reciprocal.

 

So like if you want to go in and like breed with foreign people that we deem collectively [words unclear] we’re going to expel you from the nation, you’re no longer an Australian. Take your passport and you can fuck off!

 

[1:56:39]

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. So you’re still giving the person the choice, but they have to relinquish the privileges that they’ve obtained by being Australian in order to violate the principles of the nation. I understand that. See, that’s fair. Yeah, I suppose I’m with you on that one. I just get a little bit, because I’ve always valued my own, my own autonomy.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but like the thing is White guys with Asian wives. So often I see a critic on the Internet of us and our ideology who seems like a normal White dude, and then you click on the profile and you see the Asian wife almost every time!

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you always click on the profiles of your critics to check their posting?

 

Joel Davis: On profiles all day? If I was always clicking on them I’d be doing it all day.

 

Blair Cottrell: [chuckling] Do you have any critics who you take seriously, though? Because most of the people who criticise you are not like serious critics. They’re just people that don’t like you for some reason. They don’t like something you said. Have you got any serious critics that you can, …

 

Joel Davis: They’re not really critics. I mean, I’ve had debates with people that I respect over the years who, where there are interesting debates on a particular issue. Like, I debated like the Russia, Ukraine thing with a lot of people, and I respect people that have different opinions on that issue or various other issues. I don’t think every issue is so cut and dry. And it’s interesting to hear out two positions on a lot of issues.

 

But then there’s when people are just kind of vitriolic and just hate you for emotional reasons, there’s nothing that interesting that they’re saying, you’re not really dealing with, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what I meant. Like, is there anyone who really stimulates Joel Davis, a critic that you consider to be roughly equal, who actually gets your brain moving, you enjoy actually arguing with them? Is there anyone like that?

 

Joel Davis: I haven’t found good, I used to have more people like that. But I haven’t found many good opponents lately.

 

I mean, I had a good little like, text debate with Keith Woods a few months ago. That was fun, where it was actually like a more substantive debate. But yeah, it’s hard to find good, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I sometimes wish I disagreed with. I sometimes wish I disagreed with you more on things so I could argue with you a little bit more. You would run rings around me usually.

 

But when I’ve had a good sleep and I’m in the right mood, I think we could have some really good mental clashes. I know that you kind of thrive on that kind of stuff too. I’ve noticed. Like, I watched last week’s stream with Ninja. I watched most of it and I thought to myself, next time Ninja comes on, he should try to contend with you on a few things or at least ask you to explain things further. Maybe challenge you once or twice, because I’ve noticed that that’s what really gets you going. You need that oppositional force to reckon with joel Davis: Yeah. I like debating. I like entertaining two sides. People are saying Drew Pavlou. I mean, I would go on Drew’s show if Drew wants to. I know he’s live streaming, like, every day now because he’s trying to stack Superchat coin. If he wants to get some views. Here’s one for you guys that are on Twitter. Go tell Drew Pavlou to extend the invite if he wants to have me on casual stream. We can debate things. We can discuss what’s going on in Australian culture.

 

Blair Cottrell: Drew, if you’re watching this. I don’t really know you that well. I don’t click on your profile. I’m not even allowed on Twitter. But it’s 100% a good idea. It was one of the most entertaining things I’ve ever watched. People into politics, they watched that debate that you did with Joel and thought it was really entertaining. I don’t think you could go wrong if you want to actually produce good content. I think you and Joel being in the room together again could be really good!

 

Joel Davis: Wouldn’t have to be in the room together. Like, we could just do like a Streamyard stream on his YouTube or whatever. But he’s streaming all the time and he’s just getting random people from Twitter on there. He’s getting guys that are like nationalists and stuff on there. He seems like he’s happy to talk to anyone.

 

So, yeah, someone clipped this. Drew, if you want to have a conversation, if you want to debate the issues of the day, discuss the issues of the day or whatever, a bit of content. I think it’ll get views, reach out, someone put us in touch. Let’s tee it up. I think it’d be interesting content. You know, I find Drew to be an interesting guy. He’s wrong about a lot of things, but he’s got a fun personality. I like his style. I find him to be a humourous interlocutor.

 

So let’s have a chat.

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s got lot of mental energy. I’ll give him that. He’s got a lot of mental energy. He posts on X like, 40 times a day.

 

Joel Davis: People are saying that it froze up when I said that. Is it still frozen?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it is. That’s why I was laughing, because you’re like someone clipped this and it’s just like a blurry 144p.

 

[2:01:55]

 

Joel Davis: For fuck’s sake! I don’t know what’s going on with my Internet this evening.

 

Blair Cottrell: Look, man, we got to wrap it up. I gotta go. I’m sorry, guys. I’m having a good time!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, Modern World Reject said, he threw a big Roman. He said:

 

“Indian stink!”

 

That’s the last Superchat, so we’ll end the show there.

 

Also, someone in the chat said debate Mike Enoch. Well, if he wants to have a discussion, I’ve had him on before.

 

Blair Cottrell: If I heard that Mike Enoch talks some shit about, not talked some shit about you, but how to go at you for your take on Iran, Israel situation.

 

Joel Davis: I think that was vindicated. Yeah, my take, that was vindicated. So look, I haven’t actually listened to that podcast, but people told me that too.

 

If you want to have a discussion, Mike. Yeah, I’m a fair guy. I’m happy to listen to his point of view. We agree on a lot of things, on most things. So be a fun conversation. Click this. If I’m not frozen, send it to the TRS guys, happy to talk to Mike, but yeah, I’m an open minded guy. I’m a fair guy willing to debate and discuss the issues.

 

So let’s talk about it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Before we, before we finish up. We’ve got a question for you. Is boredom a problem for you? Because I’ve realised you get like, you just have a brain that moves all the time. It’s always ticking over. It seems to be that way. Do you ever feel bored or like you’re battling boredom? Is that an issue for you?

 

Joel Davis: Not really. Only if I’m like forcibly subjected to something which is boring. But if I’m free to do my own thing, I’m never bored.

 

Blair Cottrell: So if you’re on your own, if you’re like spending periods of time during the day by yourself, like you’re not the sort of person who needs to distract yourself or find lots of things to do or think about. Like, you’re always okay with your own company. You’re always fine sitting there with your own thoughts, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I just, I feel like I don’t get enough time to myself.

 

Blair Cottrell: But yeah, no, I can relate to that. Yeah, it’s actually a good sign. Yeah, I noticed a lot of fixed personalities are like that. Like they always want more time to themselves and they seem to benefit by spending time with themselves. And I definitely fall into that category. I feel like I fall into that category, too.

 

But anyway, thanks for joining us, guys. We’ll see you guys next week, I guess. I’ve got a big weekend, so take care. Anything else, Joel, before we finish?

 

Joel Davis: No, just White power! Hail victory! Blood and honour! We’ll see you all next time.

 

Blair Cottrell: See you later, guys.

 

[2:04:38]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/28/2025 = 21 )

BeamRider101
1 day ago
Foreign operatives paying criminals to stage hoax terrorism, to then get our speech laws changed, then the people in government changing those laws, failing to show up at the inquiry, is outrageous, normally it’d be instant dismissal and total overhaul of the government, but they appear to be getting away with it again.
11 likes

Report
BradC1988
1 day ago
Ban black cunts, not knives in Australia.
10 likes

Report
thorne91
Supporter+
1 day ago
JFK was a real American
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
SSlieutenant
21 hours ago
The First Catholic POTUS
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
RoseRock444
Supporter
21 hours ago
Disgusting
0 likes

Report
leibekohne
1 day ago
China was created by jew with stolen intellectual properties just to create today’s war situation. All is pre-planned as covid was to murder legally especially young American solders, but to depopulate and destroy world usurious economy. Traitor Tramp is jewish puppet bitch. This all proofs that nothing would be changed through jew voting scum and evil democracy.
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
SSlieutenant
22 hours ago
Canada does the same thing, calling a homosexual a f-g is a $10,000 fine or jailtime.
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
22 hours ago
Did China turn on the jews under Ci Jinping?
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
mharrison52
21 hours ago
seeing us congressman calling for war with China, id say there’s a good chance. china is close to being nat soc if you really think about it.
0 likes

Report
leibekohne
1 day ago
Now it the time to register Party and nail jew for good to the coffin once and for all.
3 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
Motown88
Supporter
22 hours ago
When Whites become a minority in AU there won’t be any special privilege for minorities like there is now… In fact, persecution will go into full blown legal discrimination. South Africa is the canary in the coal mine.
3 likes

Report
mikecleary84
1 day ago
blurryish
2 likes

Report
thorne91
Supporter+
1 day ago
24:05 Blair that was fucking hilarious
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
thorne91
Supporter+
1 day ago
I was laughing so hard at this my sides hurt
1 like

Report
hailslcants
1 day ago
hey guys
0 likes

Report
hailslcants
1 day ago
what time u starting u cants?
0 likes

Report
mikecleary84
1 day ago
good enough guys
0 likes

Report
BigotSmalls
Supporter
1 day ago
LFG crew. ORG keep up with the conversation. Like share chalk.
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
22 hours ago
First 25 minutes of the show: Eldridge Colby policy William Colby his grandfather was head of CIA Anglo Americans, CIA was an Anglo organization but was couped by jews during WW2 and after JFK 1963/ replaced under LBJ Eldridge was in 1st Trump Admin and told them that China must be focused on at all costs or America will fall. His policy is intuitive, Netanyahu violated this policy by striking Iran. China is top supplier to Iran. Netanyahu is greedy and wants greater israel and cannot accept backseat. Iran is stronger than israel, and Net wants to sack US to defeat Iran. US public does not support this war. Not to mention Israel trade relationship with China.
0 likes

Report
Motown88
Supporter
21 hours ago
Your description of Gen X is lacking in understanding and knowledge… Probably has a lot to do with your millennial sense of entitlement.
0 likes

=================

ODESSY COMMENTS

22 comments

HyperChat minimums:
100 LBC
0
Doom Nebulae
16 hours ago
Why the fuck would you go fight China on behalf of ZOG?! This is beyond stupid.

6
0
GenuineGoy
1 day ago
Mike Enoch is obviously jewish in his physical appearance, and it’s confirmed by his jewish ex wife.

1
1
Hide replies
King Tut
4 hours ago
fuck Mike Enoch! every time he opens his mouth, all I hear is verbal diahreah. he is the reason why I could never get into TRS.

0
1
Cone of Silence
1 day ago
If you would like to broaden your purview on just how long, the US and us by proxy, have been subverted by Israel, the watch the last 2 episodes from Blackpilled.com

2
0
Reclaim
5 hours ago(edited)
some indian guy came to my office once and kept trying to show me his fancy watch and I was like dude, I really don’t care about such things.

1
0
GenuineGoy
1 day ago
Mike peinovich is jewish.

0
2

@EverybodywakeUp
2 hours ago
Blair hit it on the head with boomers, my mum is a boomer and she works so hard. Since she was 16, she can’t not work and always wants to be busy.

King Tut
5 hours ago
Jews aren’t just overplaying the holohoax card, but the “Nazi” card. recently at a US Senate hearing Kristi Noem and Ice were compared to “Nazis hunting down Jews” by some Jew or shabbos goy. it was pathetic! they basically saying you aren’t allowed to deport invaders who broke our laws and came to US illegally because if you do, you’re a “Nazi”.

Cecil
5 hours ago
china will take Taiwan without a shot. They have been infiltrating it for years and putting their own people in place

1
0

@CloudWhine
10 hours ago
Also, you mentioned there being ZERO evidence that Trump is a Russian Agent. I am not saying he is or isn’t, go watch the documentaries The Dubious Friends Of Donald Trump and Active Measures. Trumps deep financial ties to Russian crime and even Soviet actors goes back to the 80s and his close ties to Russian mob are undeniable. So, please review that information and revise your position. This is embarrassing.

@CloudWhine
10 hours ago
Your take on Taiwan is painfully misinformed. It is as if you are getting your information from people like McGregor and Ritter, two literal Russian sycophants. The COMMUNISTS didn’t fight alongside the Chinese Nationalists in ww2, they fled to the mountains, and when the war was over and the nationalists were beleaguered, they came down and took over. Taiwan was NEVER NEVER NEVER Part of the the CCP. Fuck China, Fuck Duginist multipolarity. Dugin is Anti White and Anti West, and youd know that if you actually listened to his long format interviews. He and Putin say their commitment to multiculturalism often. Let me guess, 4D chess? They have to say it? Forgive me if Im wrong and you know that he is a multiculturalist. Real reform looks like taking back our countries, not destroying them so 1 billion Chinese and 1 billion Indians can take over, and we get raped and killed in the aftermath. There is ZERO chance that have a Renaissance if we fall into disrepair. Our planned genocide is on the table, and will happen the second we become a punching bag for the world. Honestly, go get your information about taiwan from other sources than RT stooges or American politicians on the take from China.

1
0
GenuineGoy
1 day ago
have a good day everyone

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
thanks guys o/

Rebbe Schneerson
1 day ago
He admitted it himself

Rebbe Schneerson
1 day ago
^^^

Walther Mauser
1 day ago
Yep, Nature is racist. It is only natural.

scoobyburn
1 day ago
anti septic

warren-g
1 day ago

@ConeOfSilence
the last one was pretty good

Callaghan
1 day ago

@Daniel
1 day ago
Best show of the week coming up boys

@Daniel
1 day agoAUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE

Callaghan
1 day ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: Hello, welcome to the stream. Another show this evening, The Joel and Blair Show. It is the 6th of the 6th! Ominous! 6th of June, 2025. Big show for you tonight. A lot to discuss. A lot’s going on. We’re going to be talking about the N-word. We’re going to be talking about all kinds of things on the show this evening. The question is where to begin.

 

Also, we’re streaming live on Comfies on Comfy Friends X channel. So we lost quite a few viewers when we got banned from X. So it’s nice to be back on X. Nice to have another platform back open to the show. So hello to all the viewers on X. Strap in. Should be a good show this evening.

 

Yeah, it’s pretty fucking cold down here in Melbourne. I got the heater going. I’m pretty cosy. But how you feeling, Blair? You like the cold weather? I actually don’t mind the cold weather. It’s kind of spiritually centreing. But I know you love it because the summer, it just irritates you.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, I’m always irritated by something, but I’m less irritated in the cold. I’m not really sure why. I seem, I don’t know, my neurons fire better in the cold. I think we’re more genetically adapted to the cold, our kin, members of our race. I don’t know, I just seem to be happier when the weather’s a little cooler. I mean, what do you want? You want to lay in bed sweating all night, getting eaten by mosquitoes? It’s not for me, man! I don’t know why people like going to these third world countries for holidays like Thailand and all that shit! Like:

 

“Oh, my God, everything’s so cheap!”

 

Yeah, it’s cheap because it’s a shit hole! And no one actually wants to live there. They make all their money through tourism. It’s too hot there! I don’t really. I’m not interested in that kind of weather. I like to be far away from the equator.

 

But Joel told me, I wasn’t going to wear the beanie because I thought it’s a bit of its a bizarre kind of a beanie. I don’t have any other beanies. This has kind of been handed down to me. I’ve had it for a long time. But Joel said it looked “ornamental”. So I don’t know if that’s good or bad, but you’re gonna have to endure the beanie, guys. Look, sorry if it looks stupid. I’m not taking it off. My head’s cold.

 

02 Trump vs Musk Feud

top

 

Joel Davis: Hold frame! Don’t concede frame like that, don’t concede frame like that.

 

But, yeah, no, I got the beanie on to, because I just want to be cosy, feel cosy. But yeah, so let’s get into it.

 

I mean, there’s a lot to break down. Today, all the news breaking, waking up this morning, Australian time, and all the news breaking of Elon Musk and Donald Trump falling out. That’s kind of interesting. Like, I wasn’t expecting to cover that on the show tonight. Kind of you could see that brewing for a while, but I wasn’t expecting it to blow up like that. I think maybe we will kind of analyse that, but maybe later in the show.

 

03 Clip of NSN Rally in Melbourne – Ban Niggers Not Machetes

top

 

But first there was a kind of provocative rally. I don’t know who did it. These guys, they all dress in black and so on. I don’t really know who they are, but it was kind of interesting. They had an interesting little banner drop, kind of banner action the other day. They put out a video. So maybe we could play the video and then. Yeah, then we could analyse it.

 

[Start of clip]

 

9 news: Bouquets of flowers marking another victim of Victoria’s machete crisis. Police say up to 10 young men of African appearance are, still on the run. A teenage boy has escaped. Injuries unleashed.

All seven people allegedly involved in that violent machete brawl at Melbourne’s Northland Shopping Centre have now been arrested. That’s good news. So Andrew McCormack is in Melbourne, Maca. It comes as the state’s landmark machete ban comes into effect today.

Anita Allan (Vic State Premier): These knives are dangerous weapons. They have no place on our streets anywhere! And that is why I will introduce as many laws to get these dangerous knives off the streets.

NSN members: Chanting (with “Ban Niggers Not Machetes” banner), White man! Fight back! White man! Fight back! White man! Fight back!

7 News: Police are investigating after a mob of masked militants gathered at Northland Shopping Centre in the early hours of this morning.

[End of clip]

 

Blair Cottrell: Funny how we didn’t have much of a problem with knife crime in Australia until the government filled the country full of Africans. [chuckling] But it’s the knives that are the problem, not the people wielding them! Not the people with sub 70 IQs that don’t really understand how to deal with conflicts or get what they want through any other method than by using a knife. That’s not the problem! It’s the knives themselves! Can you believe these people? I don’t know. Joel, what do you think?

 

[05:37]

 

04 Tactical Use of the N-Word, Pros and Cons

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean this it was interesting to watch the reaction to this, because by the standards of NSN rallies, this one was pretty tame. But just because there was a tactical N-word on the banner, it got a massive response online. Just from my clicking around on TikTok and Instagram and Twitter and so on. It accumulated more views. Like the short phone clip video of the action. It accumulated more views than Australia has people. I counted at least 30 million views. Not to mention it was broadcast on the news. And not to mention whoever else uploaded it or reacted to it, I didn’t see.

 

So this went very viral! Like this got a lot of attention online. And it got a lot of attention in not in, not with, not necessarily the most politically engaged audiences, because it was posted by mainstream media accounts or other just kind of random news accounts and so on.

 

So initially it was posted on Twitter. It was posted by people connected to the so-called dissident Right. And you know, a lot of people liked it, obviously.

 

But also it drew a lot of criticism from people who said:

 

“Oh this just associates our worldview with incivility and with vulgarity. And this is just going to turn people off. And normal people they’re willing to have an adult conversation about immigration and crime and even like race and crime, but not when you go dropping the N-word.”

 

But then I started reading the comment sections on Instagram and TikTok and so on, and the comment sections were dominated by seemingly normal people, loving it! And saying, “there’s nothing wrong here”. They were very supportive. They were saying:

 

“How come White people can’t stand up for ourselves? That’s a double standard, blah, blah blah.”

 

Basically siding with the demonstration. There wasn’t too much discussion of “are these people feds?” There wasn’t all this discussion of “is the N-word offensive?”. Now obviously Leftists and non-Whites in particular, non-Whites didn’t like the rally and reacted negatively towards it. But the rally’s not for them. It wasn’t designed to appeal to them. The people that it was designed to appeal to, seemingly liked it.

 

And I think what we need to kind of come to terms with is the fact that this so-called “normie” out there that, is willing to have a grown up conversation about race, but gets turned off if you ever mention Hitler or use a racial slur or something. This person doesn’t actually exist! It’s a totally contrived concept drummed up by over politicised conservatives.

 

Blair Cottrell: Really though? I think they exist in the form of the Boomer. Not all the time, but some older generation people, they close down as soon as you mention Hitler, as soon as you start to become vulgar with terminology that you’re using regarding race. I know Boomers that will shut off instantly with that kind of stuff. So they do exist, I think.

 

Joel Davis: I think the people that shut off with that kind of stuff, they’re also not willing to, they’re shutting off in general, like they’re shutting off towards, … I don’t think people that are really open to a pro-White, like a kind of racist, racialist perspective. I don’t think that there’s a lot of people like that that are also super offended by the N-word or something. I think if you’re offended by the N-word, it’s because you’re actually offended by racism in general, no matter how clean it’s presented to you.

 

And in fact, if you do, what you saw here was, if the banner said “ban blacks not machetes” or “ban Africans not machetes” or something like that, it would have got some traction, but nowhere near as much. It would have been nowhere near as provocative to I think mass audiences. And it wouldn’t have driven a conversation, because what it did is it created this dichotomy in people’s minds of:

 

“How come the system, how come the mainstream media is more concerned about naughty words then they’re concerned about knife crime? They’re concerned about people getting slashed up with machetes, that they’re concerned about you know, incompatible, you know, races being brought into our country en masse.”

 

I’ll just bring Blair back on. Dropped off there as, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Sorry to interrupt. I have this like this hectic new mouse that I bought and it’s got all these buttons on the side and apparently one of those buttons closes the tab that I’ve currently accessed.

 

So I have to be careful not to, or maybe I can programme it so that doesn’t happen. I’ll figure it out. Sorry, please continue.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so what I was saying was is that the use of the N-word, not only did it, basically get more attention as a result, but it also created this dichotomy between how come the system and the mainstream media is more concerned with mean words or offensive speech, than they are with you know, savage violence. And also the ridiculousness of government policy that no one can tell it like it is like machetes don’t produce violent crime you know, violent criminals produce violent crime! And there’s obviously a massive difference, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Africans statistically produce more violent crime as well. Like that is just a statistic fact!

 

05 Why the Fuck Are There Africans in Australia!

top

 

Joel Davis: And why the fuck are there Africans in Australia! Like indeed. The argument for immigration is usually these people come in, they contribute to our society, they work hard, they become doctors, they become, … Africans are not coming in and contributing to our society. They’re bringing with them incredible amounts of crime. These people are coming from war torn backwards countries. They’re savage races. They’re not compatible with Western civilisation.

 

You know, obviously we push back against the arguments made for you know, the benefits of, the so-called benefits, of like Asian immigration or something, but at least they have some kind of argument if you’re looking just through the prism of economics and you don’t think about certain things.

 

But with the African migrants it’s basically impossible to really see what the benefit, supposedly is, of these people coming into our country.

 

[12:15]

 

 

06 Whites Created the Problems in the Rest of the World Through Our Expansionism and Colonialism?

top

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s not on the basis of them being any benefit to our country that they’re brought into the country though. It’s on the basis of I think two things. Human equality, the idea that everyone can be equal if they just experience the same kind of social, opportunities, situation.

 

And also the fact that Africa or African people only live in extreme poverty and experience war conflicts as a result of White colonialism!

 

And so they’re not brought into the country on the basis of its beneficial to us or being beneficial to us, it’s equality, and White people must pay for what they’ve done! So how do we get around that? How do you get around those arguments in the conversation with the standard person when someone brings that up, what’s a nice effective, quick way to respond to that, to shut them down, do you think?

 

Joel Davis: Oh, I think it’s quite simple. Like, number one we are first and foremost responsible to our own people and to ourselves before we have to like, worry about the problems of the rest of the world. Like, it’s not our responsibility to say, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But we created the problems in the rest of the world through our expansionism and colonialism. It’s all our fault!

 

And so now we have the, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s just bullshit!

 

In sub-Saharan Africa they hadn’t even invented the wheel yet when the White man showed up. These people were living in a totally savage, weren’t they?

 

Blair Cottrell: Weren’t the Egyptians black? [chuckling] That’s what some of them think. I’ve seen that online the, …

 

Joel Davis: The pharaoh Akhenaten. Based upon the DNA evidence, do you know which population is most genetically similar to Akhenaten, Blair, in the world today?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve heard. But remind me, it’s like redheads, isn’t it? Like Germans and redheads.

 

Joel Davis: Well, specifically the Scottish. The Scottish people are the most genetically similar, followed by the Irish.

 

Blair Cottrell: Wow! So there you go.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we waz. We waz [kangz].

 

07 How Irish Are You? Joel and Blair’s Ancestry

top

 

Blair Cottrell: How Irish are you? I think I’m a quarter Irish.

 

Joel Davis: Not that much. I got Ulster Scott in me, but they were from what’s called Northern Irish, but they’re not Irish, they’re Scottish. I’m more Scottish than anything other than English. Like a 50, 50 Scottish English blend. I used to think that there was more Irish in my ancestry because members of my family couldn’t distinguish correctly between northern and southern Irish. And then when I looked into it myself, I verified that.

 

But you can tell by the way I look as well. I think I got more of that look. I don’t have a very Irish look.

 

Blair Cottrell: I also thought I also thought I had more Irish in me than I do, since members of my family couldn’t distinguish between crime and peaceful resolution to conflict! [chuckling] But no, like, we go, okay. The Cottrells do all right. Mostly farmers and butchers is the history of my family. So honest people, hard working, honest people. I’m proud to come from lineage like that.

 

Joel Davis: Were you able to trace yourself back to any convicts?

 

Blair Cottrell: No. I haven’t really looked into it though, to be honest. I haven’t looked into it. My grandmother on my father’s side says that her line goes back to German and she had some evidence of that. I can’t remember what it was. But the name Cottrell often pronounced Cotrel, is from an old Frankish tribe, I think, and first appeared in England during the Norman conquests sometime during the 11th century or after that. So there’s all sorts of European stock from various different places there. English, possibly French, possibly German. We’re just not really sure.

 

08 DNA Labs Selling Your Data to Interested Parties

top

 

So, yeah, it’s all a bit grey. I don’t really go for that DNA testing type stuff. Because I have a friend who knows someone who actually got charged with an offence, a crime, as a result of someone in his family giving their DNA to one of those DNA testing websites, indicating that the testing websites, the people you send the DNA to, they sell your DNA to interested parties, state police, you know, someone growing something in a lab, perhaps. You don’t know what’s happening with your DNA when you hand it into those agencies.

 

So I haven’t done that for that reason. It might be a bit paranoid. Maybe it’s harmless. It’s up to you can do whatever you want, but I don’t really want to spit in a cup and send it through to DNA testing. What about you? Have you done any lineage?

 

09 History of the Name Davis

top

 

Joel Davis: No, I haven’t done the DNA testing, really, going off, tracing lineage. But my grandparents were pretty good at tracing lineage. So we know most of it back most generations. Yeah, people in the comments are saying Davis is Welsh, A, Welsh name. That’s true.

 

But the thing is that when the convention to develop last names came in Britain, which only happened after the Norman Conquest, so that was 1066, and it was brought in through phases in Britain up until about the 13th century, before everyone had a formal last name there or thereabouts.

 

A lot of people who became Davises was just simply because they were the son of David. You know, there was some guy called David who was their dad or their granddad or something. So that actually happened in Scotland and in England as well as in Wales. It wasn’t only in Wales where that happened, which is why, if you look at the commonality of the surname Davis, it’s more common in Britain. Oh, sorry, in England than it is in Wales. And it’s actually even more common in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and America than it is in Britain. And it’s especially common in America.

 

So obviously the Davises, we had a propensity to move when the time came to start settling the new World. So I think it’s like the seventh most common last name in America among American Whites.

 

[18:37]

 

Blair Cottrell: When I went to England, I showed you, I went to one of the oldest cathedrals in England in Winchester, which was the original capital of England before London. I don’t know if it was the official capital, but it was the centre of trade before London became the official capital. And in this cathedral there was like an old book with all of these servicemen, men who had died in service of the Crown. I think it was mostly from the First World War, but when you turned to the page D, DA, there was like 25 or 30 Davises. I noticed more Davises died for England than almost any other surname I could find in the book actually.

 

So, yeah, very popular surname from England.

 

10 Davises in the US Had Slaves Resulting in Niggers Having the Name!

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s a very common name. And yeah, famous Davises include Jefferson Davis, who was the president of the Confederacy of the Confederate States of America.

 

So yeah, we owned a lot of slaves unfortunately in the South. And that has resulted in a lot of niggers. It’s unfortunate for this reason, because we owned a lot of slaves and that has resulted in a lot of niggers in America taking on the Davis name. Why the fuck did we allow blacks to take on the last names of their slave owners? I mean that was. It’s gross! You like watch like the NFL and it’s like “Javante Davis” or some shit! And it’s like, for fuck’s sake! Why do they have our names?

 

Blair Cottrell: But the relationship between families and their slaves I think often was, you know there was relative friendship happening there.

 

And I think both the family and the slaves started really appreciating each other and maybe even the family just became a little too kind to the slaves and that’s how they ended up with the surnames. Or maybe they just kind of adopted those surnames. The slaves, when they were told to write down their name whenever they were becoming, you know, free or legitimate citizens because they couldn’t think of another name to adopt. There’s probably a multitude of reasons.

 

But I know that being a slave in old America didn’t always mean that you were mistreated in any significant way. I mean, sometimes it probably did, but it was sometimes it was just a better alternative to living in the African Wilderness. Right?

 

11 Whites, Jews, Blacks and the Slave Trade

top

 

Joel Davis: One must also remember that we didn’t go around we as in White and I guess a lot of jews were involved in the slave trade, obviously. But we weren’t going around like capturing random wild niggers in the bush of Africa or something. They enslaved their own people and then sold them to us. Right? So, like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, they didn’t sell them directly to us. They sold them to the jewish merchants who owned the slave ships, who then sold them to us.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! So it’s their shame. Like, if we enslaved our own people and then sold them to niggers that would be our shame. It wouldn’t be their shame.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but we would have the intelligence to take responsibility for it. [chuckling] There’s the difference. Right?

 

12 Instagram and the Very Positive Response to the Ban Niggers Not Machetes Action

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But let me show you guys this.

 

So, I was on, scrolling around. I have a burner Instagram account, which I don’t really use Instagram, I just have a burner account for when people send me shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: Really? You should use Instagram more. You strike me as a real Instagram kind of guy. Not really!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, maybe I should because I’m banned from everything else, maybe I should give Instagram a go. So there’s this account.

 

Blair Cottrell: Apparently, before you continue. Instagram is popping off at the moment, I’ve heard like all the memes. Like, there’s a lot more free speech allowed on there than there was before. I think Zuckerberg’s worried about being cut out of the social media capital because I’ve heard reports that it’s actually pretty based. But I don’t know how the true that is in practice. I’ll have to jump on and use it a bit more myself and find out.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I heard that a lot of nationalist accounts who were doing well on Instagram from Europe and from America, were all recently banned in a big ban wave. And they’ve nipped that slightly in the bud recently, but, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I haven’t heard about that, so maybe I’m wrong.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we should definitely probably try and make hay while the sun shines on Instagram while we’re banned from X.

 

So this is like just some random Instagram that’s got like less than 2,000 followers. Quick World. Never heard of this before. They just post random news clips, right? And then I was scrolling through and the news clips, they get like 2,000, 3,000 views, if that they posted the clip of the Ban Niggers Not Machetes banner [by NSN] action. 1.9 million views!

 

And then the comments, I was scrolling through every single comment. You know how they show like the top comments that get a lot of likes at the top.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Every single comment was positive! Look at some of these:

 

“A White man so-called hateful rally is 1 million percent more peaceful than a BLM rally. Hahaha!”

 

“So for years we get black riots with participants burning the nation’s flag, screaming black pride, and often committing acts of violence targeting Whites. But this is a disturbing display of pure hate hatred?”

 

This is how normal people are reacting. Right. I got more here, let me pull more up.

 

“I mean, they’re not wrong. No, they’re 100% correct this time. You conveniently left out the fact that they were protesting because four African teenagers threatened a 15 year old boy with a machete. Maybe give all the people the facts before making a biassed post!”

 

You know, it just goes on and on, these kinds of comments. It was incredible to see because I thought, okay, this rally is pretty controversial. I’m sure it, some people will love it, but it will it’s pretty provocative. I was surprised at how supportive a lot of these reactions were, scrolling through social media.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, me too.

 

Joel Davis: At the beginning you were telling me this is just going to upset normies and no one’s going to like this kind of thing. Maybe you don’t understand normies? Maybe normies are actually more based than you first realised?

 

[24:46]

 

 

13 Discussion on the Effective Use of the N-Word and Media Response

top

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s not just that, but I think people don’t always understand the purpose behind it. I mean, correct me if I’m wrong because it wasn’t my idea, but it’s sort of a tactical thing when you drop the N-word like that in a public way. Because it’s an effort, I suppose, to force government officials to react to what you’re doing and thereby demonstrate that they’re more offended, or taking the N-word more seriously than they are violent knife crime. It’s like it’s worse to hold up a banner with that word written on it apparently, than it is to assault someone with a machete in a public shopping centre in broad daylight in front of families and so forth.

 

It’s like that banner has essentially caused more outrage in the political and media class than the knife crime itself. Which is one of the reasons that you use that phrase. Right? You put that phrase on the banner to demonstrate for the public. Because the public don’t like that they don’t like it when there’s an obvious problem that isn’t being addressed for ideological reasons. And that’s what gets people on side. That’s Why I think the public is on your side, regardless of the slur. Because there’s obviously ideological problems. There’s a double standard being employed here.

 

Joel Davis: And that’s why it was a tactical use. Because if there’s a lot of situations where it’s a bit much maybe to drop the N-word, right? But sometimes it’s not a bit much. Sometimes it’s manifestly appropriate. And this is a situation where it is because when you’re talking about blacks running around with machetes, slicing people up in shopping malls, that’s nigger behaviour! What could be more nigger behaviour than that? That’s the exact reason why we have a slur like that for these people. So you know, it makes sense to drop a word like that.

 

And then you see a reaction where Leftists, non-Whites, who have contempt for White people, the system, all these people show so much concern about the use of a word on a banner at 3 o’ clock in the morning when no one got hurt, no one attacked anyone. It was just a video of guys holding a banner at the front of a shopping centre at 3 AM. This apparently is the most horrible thing ever! It’s so horrible! It puts everything in perspective for a lot of people. Like, hey, wait a second. And now you’ve got a sympathetic audience, a sympathetic receptacle for your N-word. Now your N-word can have a lot of potency and power because it really radicalises the conversation, enforces a conversation that otherwise wouldn’t be happening.

 

I mean, look at this. This is Daily Mail, Australia’s TikTok, right? I took this screenshot yesterday. I’m sure it has more views now. You see here I was scrolling through some of the TikToks get a lot of views. Like one here’s got half a million views. This one, 300 something thousand, 50,000.

 

 

Look at the one of the rally, though:

 

“Sickening scenes in Melbourne as White supremacists descend on Shopping Centre.”

 

7.1 million views! Right? I looked on the metrics on The Noticer. It was the biggest post the notice has made you know, this month, most traction and they’re putting out news every day. Comfy Friend posted, a clip of it. It was like one of the most viral things he’s posted. You know, it got incredible amounts of traction. I don’t think he’s got anything more viral than that all year. Why is it so interesting to people? If it’s bad activism obviously it’s good activism.

 

So that’s the thing. It’s like, apparently it’s the rule:

 

“Oh, you can’t use language like that!”

 

But, maybe it’s about trying to find the appropriate way to use language like that. Like controversy is a weapon. And now we’ve forced all of these the politicians to not only talk about the issue but also, very explicitly racialise the issue and show how, the anti-racist ideology is preventing anyone from stating the obvious and trying to come up with the only obvious solution, which is it doesn’t matter whether you ban machetes. If you’ve got a bunch of Sudanese refugees living in your city, they’re going to be engaging in violent crimes. You know, home invasions are happening every other day.

 

14 Sudanese in Pakenham Attacking White High School Kids at Party

top

 

The same night that this happened, by the way, there were a bunch of Sudanese in Pakenham, which is in southeastern Melbourne. They jumped the back fence into some some high school kids party and started bashing, filming themselves by the way, bashing all the White kids, saying:

 

“Oh, Sudanese things, just Sudanese things!”

 

And they’re like beating them up and taking their shoes, taking their phone, taking their wallet and they’re posting it online like:

 

“Haha, how funny is this? We’re just bashing White kids and taking all their shit!”

 

[29:34]

 

Blair Cottrell: What area was this in Pakenham?

 

Joel Davis: Packenham.

 

Blair Cottrell: Probably the White kids are like significantly outnumbered in Pakenham, I could imagine. Pakenham is a suburb in southeastern Melbourne, like inland suburb that is just notorious for being inundated with immigrants. A lot of immigrants, a lot of black immigrants, Indians. It’s just somewhere that most Australians don’t want to go anymore.

 

15 Machete Fight at Northland Shopping Centre

top

 

Joel Davis: Mm. But like in Melbourne you, home invasions are through the roof! Every single crime metric is through the roof! And every other day there’s some new story of blacks having a machete fight or running through someone’s house. And this machete fight, we talked about it last week at Northland Shopping Centre. The only reason that it was brought to a heel was because of a random White pedestrian, White shoppers.

 

Blair Cottrell: A random White guy. And isn’t that symbolic of the real solution to this entire problem, is that’s that standalone working class White male. The White male is the only real effective solution to this problem. The White male that is no longer afraid to just stand up and provide that physical, immediate solution. Without that guy willing to do that, then there isn’t any sort of effective solution. There’s just bureaucracy and excuses. So I found that really symbolic.

 

16 Magistrates in Victoria Are Being Trained in Diversity and Inclusion to Go Easy on Immigrants

top

 

Joel Davis: That’s the thing as well sthe only reason that we can’t solve this problem is because White guys don’t want to get thrown in jail. Because if we were to do something serious about this problem, the system would come down hard on us.

 

Meanwhile, the story was out in the Noticer earlier this year. It has come out in other mainstream outlets. It has come out that the magistrates in Melbourne or in Victoria are being trained by diversity and inclusion, whatever types, to make sure that they lower the sentencing against refugees immigrants and so on, to prevent them from getting deported when they commit violent crimes.

 

Blair Cottrell: So these magistrates would be smarter to realise, …

 

Joel Davis: These blacks are doing, like, home invasions, putting machetes to the throats of innocent families at 2 o’ clock in the morning, taking their car keys and taking their TV and their laptops, whatever. And the magistrates are being trained not to deport them, not to give them a jail sentence longer than one year, which would trigger them getting deported.

 

So then basically, they all know that even if they get caught, it’s a small holiday in prison at worst. So they’ve got no disincentive not to keep behaving like this. They know that they can just take the piss. Whereas if we rose up against them and put them in their place, they’d throw the book at us! Like, forget about it.

 

Not only are the police, and I don’t necessarily blame the police for this because it’s you know, their hands are tied. But the system! Not only is the system not enforcing the law correctly in order to deal with the problem, bringing them in the first place, which there’s no reason to bring them in, that makes any sense.

 

Secondly, not enforcing the law properly so that they basically feel emboldened to behave like this. Third, the they will actively destroy the lives and punish harshly anyone in the community who tries to put a stop to it ourselves.

 

And so they’ve created the problem, at all three levels.

 

Blair Cottrell: You think if you’re a magistrate, you’d be smart enough to realise that you’re being taken for a ride when you’re being put through a diversity and inclusion brainwashing process. You know, magistrates aren’t stupid people. You know, they’ve been in law quite a while. They’ve well I can only assume they’re not stupid people, but maybe they’re just so keen on keeping their position, keeping their their job as a magistrate that they’ll do whatever they have to do.

 

That’s the problem as well, isn’t it? It’s money, money, cowardice and the comfort of a minister’s chair or something like that.

 

17 The Problem of Anti-Racism Being Championed by Whites

top

 

But you were saying earlier, you were remarking on being surprised by how much support you were mustering up from regular people in response to a banner which would in times hitherto have just been considered vulgar and perhaps would actually just cause public uproar. And so isn’t that interesting though how The Times are changing and I think people are just angry. They’re angry enough to not even care about that word. They’re angry enough to support whoever is standing up against this, regardless of what kind of language they’re using, because people just want to see results. And that’s notable because the primary force or the sort of people who champion anti-racism are White people. White people are the reason anti-racism exists! Without naive, obsequious White people who are obsessed with feeling good about themselves, we wouldn’t have anti-racism.

 

But now we’re seeing this phenomena where many White people are sick of that. Many White people are turning their backs on anti-racism because they’re just interested in seeing results. If they have to be racist in order to see those results, so be it. They don’t care. And that’s exciting man. I’m excited to see where that future leads.

 

[35:11]

 

 

18 Upcoming Communist Anti-Nazi Rally at Northland Shopping Centre

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah it’s going to be interesting too because tomorrow, there’s some follow up stories about this shopping centre in Preston, in North Melbourne called Northland. Number one there’s going to be a communist organised rally tomorrow at the shops. An anti-Nazi rally because we held up a banner that said nigger on it. I wasn’t there, of course I wasn’t there! But, you know, members of the Org, members of the NSN allegedly were there.

 

And so they’re going to have an anti-Nazi rally. That’s going to be interesting. I wonder if that’s going to make the news. What kind of freaks are going to show up to that? I saw they said “trans folk and refugees welcome”. So I don’t know why the trannies are getting lumped in that.

 

[Image: The anti-Nazi Rally that took place on Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at Northland shopping centre Preston, Melbourne.]

 

Blair Cottrell: They’ll be destroyed. They’ll be destroyed! They’ll be de-legitimized by their own optics. So let them do it.

 

19 Meat Cleavers Being Carried as a Weapon

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, I hope we get some footage because it sounds like an absolute freak show!

 

And then also yesterday we had a story where someone was arrested at Northlands because they were wielding a meat cleaver as a weapon.

 

So the machete ban doesn’t seem to be going too well. They’re just moving on to meat cleavers now. So I wonder if they’re going to ban meat cleavers? I don’t know what the butchers are going to do. Say goodbye to your Scotch fillets because they won’t be able to chop them up anymore. Going to have to just buy the whole cow, basically, and just kind of gnaw it, because meat cleavers are probably going to be made illegal next.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s at the discretion of police when they bring in a ban like this. Like, if police see you carrying a meat cleaver on public transport obviously they’re going to take that from you. But if you’re using a meat cleaver as a butcher, I think you’re going to be okay. I know that you’re making a joke. Maybe I’m just being autistic. But yeah.

 

20 Machetes Useful When Going on Bushwalks

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I am making a joke, but that was already the case about machetes. But apparently they’ve got to ban them, so you can’t buy a machete at Bunnings [similar to Home Depot]. Say you want to go on a bushwalk a machete is very useful if you’re going off the beaten track to, basically slice your way through vegetation and so on. Because I don’t know if you guys have ever been on a bushwalk at home, or a forest walk or whatever you Americans call it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Walk through the woods.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. When you get off the path, and you’re kind of having to kind of crawl your way through shrubs and so on it becomes exhausting. Your arms get all sliced up. Having a machete just to hack through it makes your life so much easier.

 

So now we can no longer hack through vegetation without a special licence. I wonder how you get your machete licence? I don’t even know even how it works.

 

Blair Cottrell: You can’t even walk through a lot of bushland in Australia at all anymore. There’s this weird situation going on where certain lands and public parks. I don’t know what they’re called. They’re like National Parks. I think they’re called, which means they’re like public property, but they’re being closed off due to some Aboriginal heritage or Land Rights Act.

 

And apparently there’s dozens of National Parks all across the country that the government’s closed access to. And some of them are major tourist attractions. So people come to this country to walk through certain regions and see various landscapes and they can’t do it because of Aboriginal rights or something like that. But that’s a different subject to explore entirely. I saw this in a video recently. But I think there might be something deeper going on there. Perhaps the government is selling that land to private enterprise for some specific purpose. I don’t know. But I’ve got to look into it. If anyone knows anything about that, send me some details because I’m interested.

 

21 Calling Whites ‘Cum Skins’ as a Slur

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I see that there’s some seething! I don’t know if they’re a nigger, or a pajeet, but something like that, in the comments. I see the moderators have taken them out, but he called us “come skins”. I find that to be an interesting insult. Apparently this is an anti-White insult. Because of course we call them shit skins. I’d much rather be the come skin than the shit skin because you are refuse! But we’re the seed of life, you know. We’re the seed of life. So of all the kind of bodily fluids to identify with, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s virtually impossible to be offended by a racial slur if you’re White. [chuckling] Because it’s like being White is, it’s great to be White! It’s not a problem. Point it out in any way that you think is derogatory. And it’s just funny to us. [chuckling] You can’t get offended by racial slurs unless you don’t like yourself. Because someone’s pointing out your race to you and you’re trying to deny and cope with your own racial identity that you don’t like. And so you’re offended because someone’s pointing out a reality that you’re trying not to acknowledge, Right? So all you got to do is like yourself and suddenly racism is funny.

 

22 Blacks Are ‘Offended’ by ‘Nigger’ Because It Gives Them Power

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, that’s a thing with blacks too. Like if blacks, blacks already kind of 50% owned the word nigger because they turned it into like cool. You know, they got it in like rap music and they’re like, “what’s up my nigger?” And so on. And all it is like Latin for black etymologically. Like it’s nothing to even be offended by if they would just chill with everyone calling them niggers too, and like:

 

“Oh, yeah, I’m a, you’re a White guy, or whatever.”

 

It would have no potency, would have zero potency. It’s only got potency because they’re offended by it. Now they also pretend to be offended by it because it gives them power. They get to be a victim and it authorises them to commit acts of violence and aggression towards Whites.

 

And so they’ve charged it for their own hate, for the purposes of their own hatred. That’s very important to remember. The only reason why blacks get offended by the word is because they hate White people. And they want to be able to develop some kind of excuse by creating this kind of fake moral conundrum. They want to be able to create a way, a pretext, to express their racial hatred.

 

[41:04]

 

23 Average Aussies Males Don’t Like People Claiming to Be ‘Offended’

top

 

Blair Cottrell: They still want to be accepted by us as well. It’s like they don’t like us, but they also want to be treated as equals at the same time. So I don’t know what’s going on there. It’s kind of something to do with an inferiority complex, I think. But I don’t know. All I know, though, is if you’re offended by something, if you’re getting worked up about something, Australians, they’re going to keep doing whatever it is that offends you. They’re going to keep developing that line, they’re going to keep poking the bear and they’re gonna take the piss any way they can.

 

So this is not the kind of place where in social situations, being offended doesn’t really hold any weight down here in Australia. The government tries hard to make it a thing and the media’s on board, obviously.

 

But I think one of the reasons the standard working class Australian tends to still have pretty based perspectives is because it’s when you’re offended down here, it doesn’t mean anything. In a typical social situation, people just laugh at you. That’s a good thing!

 

24 They’re Trying to Make Being an Aussie ‘Bloke’ Illegal

top

 

Joel Davis: That’s how it works in a normal Australian friend group. Like, if you get offended by something, everyone will keep bullying you until you realise that you’re getting bullied because you’re offended.

 

Like if you just bantered back, then you wouldn’t be targeted. Yeah, it’s just until you realise that you’re making yourself a “victim” and then that produces a social space free of “soft cuntism”, basically, as Jacob Hersant calls it. That’s normal Australian, you know, particularly male relations.

 

And yeah, obviously they’re trying to make being a bloke illegal. Australia used to be all about being a bloke. It used to be about, drive a V8, get on the piss, do doies [donuts], send it, have a farm, you know, say what you want, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe an occasional race riot on the beach!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And they’re trying to make being Australian illegal. That’s what they’re trying to do. Because a bunch of faggot communists and seething ingrates in charge.

 

25 a Conspiracy to Make Aussies into a Mongrel Slave Race

top

 

Blair Cottrell: You can’t bully Aussies, can you? You can’t turn Australians into slaves, into a slave class. That’s why they’re trying to get rid of us. They want to replace us with a more manageable population they can bully, push around, force them to live in little McMansions and cubicles, force them to work 16 hours a day. You can’t do that to Aussies! They’re not going to play that game. And that’s what it all comes down to I think it’s about replacing us with a slave race, with a mongrel slave race. And that conspiracy, I think, is the most outstanding one! It’s the one that’s at the centre of all other conspiracies.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But also a lot of the people who want to convert us into a slave race are themselves already members of it. They’re trying to drag us down to their level. That’s the other thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Misery loves company, bro! Misery loves company!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. That’s all these freaks that are going to show up to the shops tomorrow to do their anti-Nazi protest. They’re basically the dregs of society that want to drag everyone down to their level.

 

26 the Miserable Mentality of Leftist Freaks

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you imagine the sort of things people like that talk about in private? Can you imagine the threshold of conversations like you wouldn’t be able to say anything that you’re actually thinking. All you’d be able to do is like, give shit to Nazis and talk about what a good person you are for standing up for minorities. You know, talk about the Arab style scarf that you just got given by Socialist Alternative rally on the weekend. What a boring shit life! [chuckling] It’s like, I can’t even visualise it, man! I don’t. Sorry for doing it to you. If you’re thinking about it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, they. It’s basically just a misery convention where they all get together and talk about how victimised they are and how all the different mental illnesses they have and you know, no one’s allowed to make any jokes that offend anyone. They just morally police each other all the time. It seems horrible.

 

When I was younger, I did associate with people who are ideologically Leftist in certain situations. And I never lasted long because I just offended them because I can’t help myself, I’m me! I’m an edge lord, you know, naturally. So it never worked out. But which is good. I mean, that’s obviously just natural. I don’t belong with them.

 

27 Blair’s Encounter as a Teenager at a Marxist Convention with Fat Lesbians

top

 

Blair Cottrell: So I found, I found them first as well. Like I’ve told the story a couple of times. Went to a Marxist convention when I was 18 because they were some of the first posters I saw. The posters they used to spread around Melbourne had a slogan on them saying “ideas to challenge the system”. You know, I was an edgy teenager. So, yeah:

 

“I don’t like the system. Let’s go meet these people and see what they’re talking about. No, man, not my clan at all!”

 

Wasn’t a single other working class person there. It was just all of these very overweight lesbian looking women glaring at me as though I was the enemy. And I’m like:

 

“Hey, I’m just here because we don’t like the system, right? Or hang on, these people kind of are the system. These are the exact, this is our problem right here. I’m thinking.”

 

So, [chuckling] yeah, it’s like a fake resistance. I determined it was kind of like a fake resistance that exists to possibly catch people like me and steer them in the wrong direction to essentially neutralise someone who could potentially join a revolutionary, a real revolutionary force.

 

[46:36]

 

28 Ted Kaczynski Summed up Leftism Pretty Well

top

 

Joel Davis: I think Ted Kaczynski summed up Leftism pretty well. His assessment is that:

 

“Leftists are people who are upset with the system or not embodying its own values purely enough. So they’re not revolutionaries. They don’t oppose the values of the system. They support the system so much that they’re upset with the system for not being more systemy than it actually is!”

 

So like that’s what they’re all saying. They’re like:

 

“Oh, look at the White privilege of these men standing in balaclavas at 3 AM! How come they weren’t arrested?”

 

They, probably weren’t arrested because it’s impossible to tell who the fuck they are because they’re covering up their identity because the anti-White system would arrest them and try to throw them in prison otherwise!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but what the Leftists want is for like 30 likely suspects to be rounded up at random and, executed out in the Woods for social justice! Maybe they’d be happy with that, but probably that still complain that it didn’t happen fast enough. [chuckling] I don’t know, man!

 

I mean, that’s what’s, that’s how crazy things can get though. Like, history proves that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but that’s what they are.

 

I mean, these Leftists, they’re totally, entirely dependent upon the system as individuals. They they’re on all kinds of like, medications. A lot of them are on disability benefits or Centerlink. You know, these people are not independent people that don’t need like a large bureaucracy to prop up their lives. You know, they need to go and see like mental health professionals and they need all this support! Right. I think they advocate for, is making everyone feel included and supported and having more government programmes to take care of everyone. They call themselves “anarchists”. It’s the most un-Anarchistic position you could possibly have! They can’t have enough government. They want to turn everything into a democracy. They want everything in society to be this big bureaucratic voting committee procedure where, that’s their ideal. They don’t want to be left alone.

 

29 Marcus Follin Said That ‘Dysgenics is the Only Reason Leftism Still Exists’.

top

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d have more empathy for them if they weren’t so self contradictory, if they weren’t literally representing the opposite of what they claim to represent. It’s wild that people can come to that manner of existence.

 

But look, in summary, Marcus Follin [aka the Golden One] said that:

 

“Dysgenics is the only reason Leftism still exists.”

 

It’s just dysgenic. It’s bad genetics, bad blood, too much drugs, too much of that victim psychology that comes along with just being genetically deficient. And like, you can’t really get past that summary. I don’t think that’s a good summary. Wraps it all up.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah! Fair enough. Is there anything else to say about this particular subject? I mean everyone knows, everyone who’s an Australian at the very least knows about the problems with African crime. There’s not much point going over it again. I mean, it’s important to reiterate it to the public.

 

But you know, we all know about it and we cover it on the show all the time.

 

But yeah, it was interesting to see. I think the, it’s more the reaction to the banner and how it was received by different groups of people that I found more interesting to be honest than anything else.

 

30 A Non-White Reaction to the Ban Niggers Not Machetes Video

top

 

Blair Cottrell: I wanted to remark on a reaction video I saw that, a woman filmed. The woman was not White.

 

Joel Davis: Do you have it? I can play it.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, I don’t. I saw it in some chat on Telegram and I’m in so many different chats that people add me to, I can’t remember which one it was. But I remember some of what she said. She was clearly very upset, wasn’t White by anyone’s standards. I don’t know what she was though. She kind of looked maybe slightly African and, I don’t even know. But she was quite wide eyed in the video here and there, like kind of crazy eyed! But there was something she said I found interesting. She demanded that:

 

“Other people need to call this out!”

 

Sure, she said the police should arrest these guys and investigate and blah blah, blah. But she said:

 

“Other people must call this out!”

 

And I thought, isn’t that peculiar? Whenever someone who’s not White feels discriminated against, targeted by racism, they appeal to other White people to come to their aid. It’s like they feel like they can’t even help themselves. They require the White champions of anti-racism to storm in and save the day! And it brings me back to what I was saying before. What happens when those anti-racists no longer exist within the White community? What happens when White people actually start to become ethnically conscious and realise they’re just losing out as a result of this equality worldview? That anti-racism is actually just against their collective ethnic interests. It works against them in every way! You know what happens then? It’s like when all these non-White people are complaining about racism, it basically just dies out, doesn’t it? The whole thing dies out.

 

I mean what do you think? Why do you, why do you think they do that? Why do you think they appeal to White people whenever they experience discrimination? Why can’t they deal with it themselves? Why can’t they come up with some resolution as a result of their own thinking?

 

[52:09]

 

31 Why Non-Whites Call On Whites When They Experience ‘Discrimination’

top

 

Joel Davis: Well, because they know that they’re in our country. And, if White people en masse basically saw our position as legitimate and joined with us in our cause their position in our country becomes precarious. So they need, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It just occurred to me, maybe she was. I’m kind of just thinking while I’m listening and thinking back to the video as well. Maybe she was afraid? Maybe it wasn’t just anger in her eyes that I saw, but fear as well. Maybe she thought that the fact that banner drop happened, it might be a sign that White people aren’t as anti-racist as they were before and therefore her presence in our country isn’t as secure as she once previously believed? Maybe it’s kind of like a fear reaction, a self preservation thing. Like:

 

“Come on guys, we need to call this out. We can’t let this become the norm or I won’t be able to live here anymore. Fuck!”

 

Maybe it’s something like that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, it’s basically that she’s obviously showing her anxiety. You told a story about when you’re in jail and I thought that was pertinent. Where you were talking about how there was like some non-White guy. This is years ago, when you’re in prison, like before you became so ideological.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a good story.

 

32 Blair’s Prison Story About a Nepalese Taking Advantage of His Kindness

top

 

Joel Davis: I mean, you should tell the story. It’s your story.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m like 22, I think. And, I’m almost done serving my prison sentence in Port Phillip Prison. And this new guy comes in. He’s Nepalese, from Nepal. Tiny little guy. Like he had a man’s face with stubble, but on the body of like an 8 year old boy by our standards. I couldn’t believe how small he was. And he looked like he hadn’t eaten a good meal in weeks.

 

And a little while later I was cooking some eggs. Used to cook eggs on a sandwich press, like on a toasted sandwich maker because we didn’t have anything else to cook on. So you just fire that up, cook your eggs on that. And I was cooking like 10 eggs. I used to buy a maximum amount of eggs you’re allowed to buy as a prisoner, which was three dozen a week. And he walked by and I signalled to him and I gave him some eggs just because he looked so skinny! It was almost irritating me. I’m like:

 

“Get some food into your mate. You look like you need a good meal!”

 

Problem is though he didn’t see it as a random act of kindness. I didn’t realise it at the time, but he saw it as a weakness! He looked at me a certain way and then every day after that he just asked me for more eggs and other stuff too! More than once actually.

 

After that I noticed him looking into my cell as he walked past, seeing what else I had, seeing what he could get out of me. And then a group of Arabs, I saw this happen. They pulled him into a cell, tied him to a toilet and kicked the shit out of him. Probably for no reason. That happens in jail sometimes.

 

And I remember this because I was sitting down while this was happening, a few cells down, I could hear it happening. And he was shouting my name! He was shouting. He couldn’t say my name properly because English was his second language. He was saying “Blaira”. Screaming at the top of his lungs, “Blaira, Blaira”. And they were laughing at him. I could hear them laughing at him, saying:

 

“He’s not going to help you.”

 

And I thought to myself:

 

“What does he expect? Does he expect me to charge in there and take on a pack of wild Arabs like it’s a fucking Bollywood movie?”

 

Like, I realised that just by doing one nice thing for this guy, he just expected me to fall all over myself after that, to come to his aid to protect him and to provide him with whatever else he could get out of me.

 

And I realised, this is a great lesson here. I realised that some people, particularly people of the brown distinction, they don’t see kindness as kindness, they see it as naive weakness! And they just try to leverage more out of you perpetually. And isn’t that a good lesson? Or wouldn’t that be a good lesson for our politicians to learn? Because what are the people coming to this country doing? They’re not grateful for being allowed to come into the country in the first place. They’re not seeing it as an amazing opportunity like the Greeks and the Italians did. They’re not working their asses off to do the best they can for their families. Not all of them, not by a long shot. They’re thinking:

 

“Ha! What a bunch of idiots! What else can I get out of these morons? Oh, I can get housing, I can get welfare, I can get special rights because I’m not White and I’m oppressed! I come from war torn country. Wow, these people are really fucking stupid! What else can I get out of them?”

 

And it just never ends, right? So when you’re kind, when someone’s nice to you, when you’re a White person, right, you think to yourself, great, and you make the most out of the opportunity. You’re thankful for it, but you move on. You don’t keep asking for more. You don’t see kindness as weakness. You just understand that it’s a random act of kindness. Because White people are like that. They’re randomly kind because they just empathise with someone in that situation. In the moment. But it doesn’t mean that you can take advantage.

 

And I don’t know, I thought that was a good story to demonstrate that a lot of people out there who aren’t like us, you shouldn’t show kindness to them. You shouldn’t be so nice to them because they just take advantage of it. They actually just see you as stupid or weak for being nice. Maybe I could have told that story better.

 

[57:30]

 

 

Joel Davis: No, you told the story very well. The word kindness, it’s got the, like, etymologically, it means treating someone as your kin, as your kinsman or kinswoman. It means treating someone like family. Well, these people aren’t your fucking family! Stop treating them like that. They’re taking the piss. I mean, it’s pretty obvious. But that’s how non-Whites think. I was thinking about this today as well, when I was thinking about why it is that, I guess I don’t know where Blair went. I guess we’ll be back soon.

 

33 Elon Musk Admired by Merchant Minded Indian and Asians

top

 

When I was thinking about how come it seems like Asians and Indians, like really respect Elon Musk, whereas White people I find even if, you know, Elon Musk has done things over the last couple years that some of the things that he’s done, people like us have liked. Some of the things that he’s done, we haven’t liked. Right. But he’s been a mixed bag the last couple of years.

 

You know, he’s throwing Romans. He partially restored our guys to Twitter, at least for a period of time. You know, he played to the pro-White thing a little bit. But he doesn’t really seem to be respected overall by people in our group, because everyone can kind of smell, White people can smell that he’s got an agenda, that he’s disingenuous in some way. That because he’s a billionaire! He’s one of the richest men in the world. We don’t trust this guy.

 

Blair Cottrell: No one gets that, … [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! Everyone knows that he’s obviously got an angle that is that there’s a disingenuous angle. Everyone can smell it. Every normal White person could smell it. Left-wing or Right-wing, everyone can smell it!

 

Whereas Asians and Indians, they all think that he’s, like, amazing! Because they’re merchant races. So to them:

 

“Wow, look at how rich and successful he is. And look at all of his companies!”

 

In Australia, when you see a Tesla, you will almost never see a White person driving it. I know in America a lot of Leftists before Elon switched teams, a lot of Leftist Whites were driving Teslas as a status symbol. And that happened a little bit here. But predominantly, if you see a Tesla, it’s a fucking Indian or an Asian driving it in Australia.

 

Blair Cottrell: I have noticed that.

 

Joel Davis: Because they get sucked in by it because he’s like this rock star merchant. But we’re not a mercantile race. It doesn’t jive with us in the same way. These people think differently. It’s the same.

 

34 Indians and Asians Obsessed with Ways to Make and Spend Money

top

 

I’ve said this before whenever I’ve worked with Indians and Asians, and then it’s been like the lunch break or something and was we’re talking just about you know, making conversation, making small talk. What I have found is that all they want to talk about is ways to make money and ways to spend money:

 

“Oh, I’ve got a good deal here. Oh, what do you think about crypto? Which crypto-currencies do you think are good? Oh, have you got a good bet on the cricket? Blah, blah!”

 

It’s all just like, ways of how to exchange m, you know, mercantile information with one another about ways in which we can make money or spend money more efficiently. That’s their entire fixation. When I talk with White people, yeah, those subjects come up occasionally, but generally speaking, it gets into something with a bit more depth in terms of like philosophy on family or life history or our perspective, our values, whatever, right? Music, art, something like that. But I’ve never been able to have much of a conversation about any of these subjects with an Indian or an Asian because they’re soulless!

 

Blair Cottrell: With the merchant brain it doesn’t really matter how you’ve achieved the success, how you own the companies, how you have the capital. What matters is that you’ve got it! You know what I mean? There’s no, like there’s less of a moral compass. It’s just about success for the sake of success, and that’s it. That’s good enough for the merchant. That’s the way they think.

 

35 More on the Nepalese Guy in Prison

top

 

And in regards to the story about the Nepalese guy, by the way, like, if you might be saying:

 

“Oh, that poor guy, he got beat up by people for no reason. Why didn’t you help him, Blair?”

 

Uh you got to understand, this guy’s in jail. I actually heard about this guy’s story. He was an immigrant on a working visa. He was doing an apprenticeship as a chef under an Australian citizen, and he stabbed the head chef! He stabbed an Australian citizen. So he’s in jail for that. Then he was going to be deported when he finished his sentence. So like there’s a reason he’s in jail, being tied to a toilet and having the shit kicked out of him by a group of Arabs. That’s because God wills it! That’s fate. [chuckling] That’s what happens if you come to this country, you’re not from this country, and you stab a citizen in this country. So like, don’t think that I’m in some position where I’m a noble protector of people who are being beaten up. And you should never think the same about yourself either. You see some guy getting stomped on the street, you have to understand that sometimes he’s put himself in that position and it’s happening for a reason.

 

So if you don’t know someone that’s happening to, or it’s not really your business, you stay out of it! That’s kind of the position I would take generally.

 

[1:02:37]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but if it’s a White guy and there’s a pack of nons, particularly if you’re out with the boys, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You read the situation, …

 

Joel Davis: You gotta back your boy. I mean, that’s happened. I’ve been out with the boys quite a few times, and there’s been a White guy getting picked on by a pack of non-Whites. And, the non-Whites picked on the wrong White, like, at the wrong time, because a pack of Nazis just happened to be there and sort it out.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, [chuckling] it can happen. Yeah. No, like I said. Anyway, it’s quite obvious when someone is being targeted unfairly, is being stood over, is being bullied, that kind of thing.

 

36 NSN Promo Clip

top

 

Joel Davis: I’m getting a message from NSN HQ Beaming into my headset. Apparently a new hype edit just dropped. Haven’t even seen this edit. I’m gonna play it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Let’s watch it. Let’s watch and get a raw reaction to it.

 

Joel Davis: Let’s hit it!

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Who makes those, bro? That’s fucking cool! If I was 19, 18, I would join straight away! I mean, put yourself in the position of a young guy growing up in the current conditions, societal conditions. You’re going to join that every time! Whoever sees that and who has any balls left at all is going to join. That’s good stuff. It’s good content.

 

37 On Why You Should Join the Org

top

 

Joel Davis: Imagine, imagine not joining us!

 

Like if you’re an Aussie, you’re a young White dude, even like a middle aged White dude. Join the fucking Org! Like, come on, like be a man, join the clan! You know, fucking hell, like what else are you going to do? What else are you doing? We’re all gonna die! You know, someone close to me died recently. It’s the first time a close member of my family has died so so far in my life and makes you reflect upon, just how quick and short life is and how you got to make it count because who knows, you get hit by a bus tomorrow, who knows?

 

But even if you have a full innings, it’s not that fucking long, you know, it blows, it goes quick and you gotta make it count! You gotta make sure that the time that you do have, you invest it in something worthwhile. And there’s been too many lives wasted amongst our people over recent decades. Too much nihilism, too much individualism in our people are just blowing through their lives on entertainment and trivial matters and you know, trying to make money and just shit that ultimately doesn’t really matter. I’m not saying that you shouldn’t be trying to make money and have a successful career but you know, what really matters, what really matters obviously is your family and your nation legacy that you’re leaving behind, the people that you love and that you care about your people and that’s all that really fucking matters. Everything else is secondary.

 

So you know, join the fucking tribe that’s going to put up a resistance to the genocide of our people for fuck sake. Like whatever else that you’re doing is significantly less important.

 

And it’s fucking fine, like we have a fucking great time! So yeah, join the Org, White Australia.org. You can join as a supporter. But if you want to join as a member, get on Telegram, message White Ausbot. That’s WHITE AUSBOT at White Ausbot on Telegram and get vetted and join the Org.

 

Blair Cottrell: I realised we just had an ad break, a really cool ad break. Like most streams you would get some gay product like you know, “men’s beard straighteners” or something like that! [chuckling] But in this one you get, we interrupt this stream to bring you exclusive new hype edit, Join the Nazi gang! [chuckling]

 

38 Succulent Chinese Meal – Democracy Manifest Guy

top

 

Joel Davis: Oh, yeah! By the way, did you see that thing that Tom posted on Telegram just before we went live here? He got a screenshot from everyone surely knows the:

 

“This is democracy manifest!”

 

You know, that guy, the very famous, he was eating a succulent Chinese meal in King’s Cross [Sydney’s old red light area]. I think this was back in the 90s. And he was arrested and it’s a viral clip. Maybe I should pull it up. Surely everyone’s seen that it’s such a famous meme! Such a famous meme. You know it Blair, surely?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Like the guy getting carried out of the restaurant?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you know the story behind that? The story behind that I, as I heard it is this guy was just travelling around Melbourne eating like really fancy restaurants. I mean, just walking out. So he was getting free dinners every night.

 

Joel Davis: It wasn’t him though.

 

Blair Cottrell: It wasn’t him?

 

Joel Davis: No, no, no! So it was in Sydney. It was in King’s Cross in Sydney. And it was a case of mistaken identity.

 

There was a guy that was doing “dine and dashes” as they call them, and they got the wrong guy or they thought he was doing credit card fraud or something like that. And they come in, they arrest the wrong guy, and he has that hilarious reaction. And now it’s you know, it’s a goated meme. It’s funny how like 50% of Australian memes are some guy getting arrested or engaging with police in some way because we’re a convict colony. It’s like, …

 

[1:09:05]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s funny how they have the wrong guy. They have the wrong guy, but he still just gives them so much grief! And it’s a complete smart ass, just by Aussie instinct.

 

I mean, I thought he was the guilty one from the way he reacted, but he’s not. He’s just Australian. [chuckling] And that’s his reaction to authority trying to tell him what to do.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, it’s awesome! It’s goated. It’s legendary. But Tom posted a screenshot from the Wikipedia article. Unfortunately, rest in peace. I believe he passed away. He was 82, but he passed away, I think a couple years ago. But it says here:

 

“In 2023, true crime author Mark Dappin published a biography of Carlson, (so his last name was Carlson) titled ‘Carnage A Succulent Chinese Meal, Mr. Rent a Kill, and the Australian Manson Murders’ that explores his connections to other criminals. The book revealed that Carlson was an admirer of Adolf Hitler and Nazism. And then on at least one occasion he threw a party at his home to celebrate Hitler’s birthday!”

 

Jack Carlson was his name.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Wow, I didn’t know any of that. That’s really interesting.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so, pretty funny!

 

So the “Succulent Chinese Meal-Democracy Manifest Guy” was our guy! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: You can tell by the way he speaks that he’s a well read individual. You know, he’s quite articulate.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, absolutely! I think he was like a Shakespearean actor. He would act in Shakespearean productions and stuff.

 

39 Blair Giving a Lift to a Stranger

top