Blair Cottrell: Okay, this Sunday on 31st of August, is the March for Australia, happening all across Australia.

 

 

Now, let me just be clear. I’m not organising this event. I’m not staking any claim on it. That’ll get me started on explaining to you guys exactly what’s going on, actually, because this is an organic phenomena. It’s happening all on its own. No one is really at the helm of this thing. It’s Australians coming together of their own accord.

 

 

That’s not the first time something like this has happened in my lifetime. I think the last time this happened was about 10 years ago with the Reclaim Australia phenomena.

 

 

And then prior to that I was still just a young fella. That was the Cronulla beach protests, which they call the “Cronulla Riots”. But the system just framed it that way.

 

 

Each time this happens, it happens in response to some form of immigration or foreign presence in Australia, which is a source of pain or disruption to our way of life!

 

And also because anyone who can do anything about this pain, anyone in government, is not only doing nothing, but they’re making the situation worse by forcing more immigration onto Australians! And we’re supposed to live in a democracy, you’re supposed to only get what you vote for. But no one voted for mass immigration! Yet they’re having it forced on them anyway!

 

But mass immigration is obviously becoming a serious source of pain for Australians, which is why they’re responding with this anti-immigration counterculture.

 

But what’s actually happening here, the way I understand it, is its like a national immune response to foreign bodies.

 

 

Just imagine your own body’s immune system. When too many foreign bodies come in, the immune system activates to protect itself, and it does that without you really thinking about it. It’s not like you have to plan out an immune response. Your body reacts on its own.

 

 

Australians are much the same. If you imagine Australia like an organism, when too many foreign bodies start coming in at once, the national immune system activates to protect the country.

 

 

And the cells within the national body which can potentially make up the immune system response are us! The Australian people!

 

That’s why there’s no single organiser or promoter for this March for Australia. There doesn’t need to be. Australians are doing it on their own.

 

 

And naturally, there are some networks of (((people))) who aren’t very happy about the formation of this anti-immigration counterculture.

 

But if you think about it, realistically, there’s only three different types of people who wouldn’t support the March for Australia and the call to stop immigration.

 

 

The first type are immigrants themselves. Obviously, they’re not going to support this agenda. They’re trying to get family members into Australia on some bullshit student visa, just so they can live here together. They want to stay here, they want to get more people in. It’s not really in their interest to support this. So obviously they’re happy to be here and they’re happy to keep exploiting the situation.

 

But the second group that’s actually exploiting the situation are big business owners and big property developers and capital.

 

 

The kind of immigration rates we’re seeing into Australia are inflating the labour pool to such an extent where the traditional Australian worker can be replaced with a more manageable slave class, which will work for less and live in smaller spaces. Which is great for big business owners.

 

But then you’ve got property developers. Immigration drives up the demand for property, so big property owners and lessors can jack up property prices and rent. This means big bucks for big capital. You know the kind of (((people))) that sponsor major political parties.

 

Now, the third group of people who won’t support the march, these are the more deranged types, the kind of people who fell for all the conditioning and propaganda in the schools. You know:

 

 

“Australia was invaded by evil White devils! And everyone in the world can be Australian! It doesn’t matter your race or skin colour!”

 

If you believe that, you’re basically retarded and you support mass immigration because you’re retarded!

 

 

If I go back to my analogy of the organic national body, these people would be like a disease network which are trying to suppress and attack Australia’s immune system to make sure we can’t defend ourselves, which really works to the interests of immigrants and big capital.

 

Now, the first two groups, you can understand their motivation, it’s selfish. But the third group is really twisted! Don’t waste your time arguing with them, just ignore them. These people cannot be reasoned with. They’ll say and do whatever they can to prevent the Australian people from actually organising into some sort of culture where they can resist government policy, because current government policy is feeding disease networks like them.

 

Now, if you don’t fall into one of those three aforementioned categories, you probably do support the March for Australia, because you’re a standard working Australian family!

 

 

You want to be able to afford a home for your family, you want decent living conditions. You don’t want your country overrun by people from the third world. It’s pretty standard, normal stuff!

 

The point is, don’t let anyone gaslight* you into believing that getting involved in political activity and process makes you evil or is pointless. If it was so pointless, then why would they be so intent on stopping you from doing it?

 

[* Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which a person or group causes someone to question their own reality, memories, or perceptions, often leading to confusion, loss of confidence, and dependence on the manipulator. The term originates from the 1938 play (and later film) Gas Light, where a husband deliberately dims the gas lights in their home and then denies it, making his wife doubt her sanity.]

 

I do think the best result for a protest like this is probably a new political organisation or party which can challenge the major parties, because Liberal and Labor, they both essentially have the same (((sponsors))) and their policies aren’t that much different. They’re not going to stop immigration, they’re just going to keep ramping it up.

 

I think the march on Sunday will be a good start. I’ll see you there!

 

 

[05:01]

 

 

END

top

 

 

Blair on the way to the March for Australia event in Melbourne.

 

============================================

 

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live. It is the 17th of July, 2025. We had some bizarre technical nonsense going on for some reason, but we got the stream happening. We’re here we have Tom back. First time since Australia Day. We’ve got three of us back together. He’s finally off the ridiculous bail conditions. The South Australian police finally dropped the ridiculous charge of loitering from Australia Day, which I’m sure a lot of you are familiar with the events of that day. But it’s good to have you back, Tom.

 

How do you feel? I mean, I feel personally vindicated. I felt vindicated already considering all the other charges that were dropped. But this really cements the vindication that not just that we didn’t do anything wrong, we knew we didn’t do anything wrong, but that we made the right decision on the day to expose the tyranny. People were saying:

 

“Oh, how does going to jail, going to save the White race?”

 

Well, guess what, we’re not going to jail. Not for this anyway. [chuckling] Jury’s still out whether we go to jail for some other reason, but not for this.

 

So how are you feeling?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I think vindicated is the right word. It is a victory in the sense that we have shown the Australian people that through strength and persistence and resilience, we can get our message across. We can suffer without being humiliated.

 

And I think that’s important that Australians need to hear that. Currently we’re being humiliated as a people. The White Australian population is being obviously replaced and it is being humiliated while it’s being replaced. And if we stand up against this tyranny, they will make us suffer.

 

And I think through our strength, we’ve made it clear that suffering is more valuable than just living a peaceful life that’s ultimately humiliating.

 

So that’s how I feel strength. I feel strong. I feel that our strength and our resilience has proven us right.

 

Joel Davis: That’s a good point because you are naturally adapting to the kind of harassment tactics used to try to prevent you guys from doing what you’re trying to do, whether it’s activism or building the political party. And you do seem to have done or made a great deal of progress in the realm of adaptation. Because I’ll make the point, this basically panned out exactly as you said it would. You said you’re going to cop a beating on the day. You predicted there would be bullshit charges that wouldn’t stick and that have to drop eventually. And now that’s exactly what happened.

 

So not only are you adapting in terms of strategy, but you now know what to expect. As though the system has basically used all its cards and they can only keep doing the same thing they’ve always done. And you keep getting better at dealing with it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. And so much has changed for our organisation in terms of support from the public over the last six months. And I mean, what’s been really incredible is, and I don’t want this taken the wrong way, but we have had a lot of people that are former members of the Liberal Party reach out to us and say that one of the reasons why they have left the party and have started to donate to our cause and started to support our cause is because they can see, based off the election and the Liberal Party moving further to the Left and based off how we were treated by the system in Adelaide, which is, I think it’s a pretty strong liberal kind of state. I mean, Adelaide’s pretty churchy and has a lot of Christians in it and it’s got quite a conservative movement.

 

But this is how, you know, probably one of the more conservative states in the country, other than, I guess, Queensland. This is how they treat political dissidents on the Right. And that for them was the straw that broke the camel’s back. And their reason for supporting us going forward.

 

So it’s interesting that even in persecution, you can gain support and a following and assistance from people that have spent their whole life in mainstream politics. So I didn’t expect that. I didn’t predict that. I did predict that the Australian public in general would be more supportive of us, but I didn’t expect so many people would be jumping ship from the previous conservative faction of the Liberal Party.

 

The last thing I heard from our insiders within the Liberal Party is that about 50% of the members have left in the last two years.

 

And I’m not saying all of those have jumped across to us, but a significant portion of particular branches and seats have come across to show their support for us. So that’s good to see.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s a big number.

 

Joel Davis: It’s a good moment actually. I will say join the movement! Join the prospective political party White Australia.org. I do a bad job of remembering to shill this every week, so I’m just going to say it now while I’m thinking of it. If you’re in Australia, I put out a poll on Twitter a few days. Sorry, on Telegram a few days ago. The poll was, if you’re a White nationalist, how many times have you met up with other White Nationalists, at least one other White nationalist in real life this year to discuss politics or do anything political?

 

Very low bar. 57% of respondents said zero times. That’s crazy! So, like more than half of the Joel Davis spurg Telegram following can’t even meet up once with one White nationalist in real life since the beginning of this year. So I understand a lot of my followers are in other countries and whatever. But that’s a horrible statistic!

 

So if that’s you and you live in Australia, you have no excuse, like our country is being stolen from us. White Australia.org, sign up as a supporter. Maybe you don’t want to come and march in the street dressed in black and you know, get arrested, but you can at the very least join up as a supporter and help us found a political party to represent you and your beliefs, which obviously, if you’re watching this, unless you’re one of the assigned police officers or intelligence agents or journalists watching this, you share our beliefs.

 

So who else is going to represent them? No one except us! So sign up White Australia.org. Be part of the solution!

 

[06:43]

 

Blair Cottrell: Tom, what happened in your latest court appearance and what does that mean for you going forward?

 

Thomas Sewell: So today we had, I think, the third or fourth case conference, which is where the prosecution says they’re not ready to go to trial and they want to have a little bit more time to prepare. And they dragged us out for as many as they could, as many case conferences as they could, until eventually they had to drop the charges. Today the last charge I had was the loitering charge, which was the alleged reason for my arrest outside the Anzac Memorial in Adelaide on, I think it’s called North Terrace. I think the street, very beautiful part of Adelaide. We picked that area on purpose because of how beautiful it was.

 

And obviously I was arrested as I began giving a speech about how the South Australian police are corrupt and are serving traitor politicians.

 

So the whole purpose, the whole meaning or reason for the arrest was dropped and that was done very quickly. And then, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Was that the primary purpose for the arrest? Loitering? Is that what they tried to sell?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And then when I was arrested and taken back to the police station for allegedly loitering, they said that I’m being charged with loitering, resisting arrest and Nazi symbols.

 

And then when I got my paperwork, it just had loitering and Nazi symbols.

 

And then about six weeks ago, the Nazi symbols charge got dropped, which was the Union Jack and NSN patch on our shoulders.

 

And then obviously today they dropped loitering. But they put on a new charge today, which they hadn’t sent any information about to the magistrate or to my lawyer. And they have charged me with breaching the bail conditions for the loitering charge.

 

So I was under non-Association for loitering. And they’re saying, they’re suggesting, they’re alleging that I breached at some point over the last six months, I associated, they’re alleging, with people in our community.

 

So they’ve dropped the bail conditions because they were attached to the loitering. But there is another court date again for breach of bail.

 

Blair Cottrell: So they’re accusing you of breaching bail on a charge that they’ve dropped?

 

Thomas Sewell: Correct. And I asked the judge that question. I said:

 

“How can someone be charged with breaching bail conditions that were put on me that have now been dropped? Like if I didn’t commit the crime, why was the bail conditions even put on me? And therefore, how could I be charged breaching bail conditions that are put on me falsely?”

 

Blair Cottrell: It would make sense that the conditions imposed during the bail period are now void because it’s been found that there was no evidence to uphold the original charge in the first place.

 

Thomas Sewell: That would make sense, wouldn’t it? That’s common sense. But that’s not, unfortunately, how the magistrate saw it.

 

And instead of answering my question, he instead told me that I was being represented and wasn’t allowed to talk. And I told him to:

 

“Answer my question, buddy!”

 

Blair Cottrell: He wouldn’t have liked that!

 

Thomas Sewell: Because these people don’t deserve any respect. They are absolutely disgusting, corrupt thugs, that think that they can lock Australians up for, in the case of Stephen Wells, 4 months, over 100 days in solitary confinement for charges that were dropped. And they think that they deserve some sort of respect or honour for their disgusting, corrupt behaviour! It’s absolutely putrid! The Australian people should be, it’s absolutely abhorrent what the political class, what the ruling class are putting Australians through.

 

And when I called him, “buddy”, he threatened to have me removed from the call. And I just said:

 

“Okay, well then remove me. Like, you’re nothing, but you’re all corrupt, basically. And I want the record to show that you’re all corrupt.”

 

And then they just booted me from my own court case.

 

So they could have just put me on mute, but instead they just booted me for my own court case.

 

So that’s pretty funny. But they’re just disgusting! I hate them! I absolutely hate them! They’re absolutely disgusting! The prosecutors are professional liars! They put so many good men in prison over nothing. Over nothing! And all the charges have been dropped, except I think Joel’s belt, his [eagle] belt buckle, and one other guy still hasn’t had his loitering charge dropped yet.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, before you ask your question, Joel, if they are so corrupt, I’m assuming you mean the magistrate is corrupt as well?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, all of them. The original magistrate.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, why participate in the process? Like, have you got a plan? What’s the end goal? If they’re so corrupt, like, why answer their summons?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, if you don’t, you eventually get shot!

 

So I’m not looking to get shot at this stage by the police. Ultimately, you have to play the game. You have to abide by the law at all times, only break it to seize power. I think that was Julius Caesar that said that. He also said, Julius Caesar said:

 

“We must endure pain with patience!”

 

And I feel that every day we have to endure this pain with patience. And we’ve been doing that for some time now. And we’re going to keep enduring pain until we take power. And when we take power, then we’ll reassess the laws.

 

[12:11]

 

Blair Cottrell: I can imagine you’re probably holding out for maybe some High Court judges that maybe aren’t corrupt, right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, that’s a separate issue. So what we are looking to do is bundle all this stuff together with our High Court case, which I think you and Joel have covered a fair bit on the stream. I won’t go into too much detail, but, yes, we are still following through with two plans. One, appealing all the current criminal charges against us regarding Nazi symbols and gestures and any sort of attempt to stop our political communication.

 

And also we are looking to privately sue the police for their behaviour, their unlawful and unconstitutional behaviour.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think old Stephen Wells might have a role to play in that, because I can’t believe that guy spent, how long was it? Nearly four months. Three months. Four months in jail over a loitering charge that was then dropped just because he was trying to celebrate Australia Day publicly. I’ve never heard of anything close to that in Australian activism.

 

Joel Davis: According to High Court precedent, Stephen Wells has standing to go to the High Court and challenge the Constitutionality of what was done to him, of the acts that he was charged under. Because even though the charges were dropped, he did serve time. And particularly because they didn’t just charge him with loitering. Originally they did, but then when they realised that they’d have to release him after three months because it has a maximum sentence of three months. They then slapped a Nazi symbol charge on him in order to enable them to extend his stay in prison basically beyond the three month mark.

 

So he has standing to challenge that law at the High Court now because there’s been plenty of precedent established in High Court decisions that you don’t have to be being actively prosecuted under a particular law. You only need to have standing to go to the High Court. You just simply need to have suffered as a result of that law, that potentially unconstitutional law, and have reason to suspect that it could be applied to you again in the future. Now the Nazi symbol charge related to literally the symbol of our organisation or the NSN at the very least.

 

And so if you’re a member of the NSN, basically what they’re trying to say is that you could get arrested and thrown in prison for displaying our logo in public.

 

So it’s a political organisation. It seems like a pretty clear cut and dry constitutional issue.

 

So that’s what’s interesting that they’ve kind of facilitated Stephen potentially to go to the High Court. Also. Stephen Wells is up for a very handsome compensation payout. And so I think Stephen Wells will get paid very well for his four months. And Stephen Wells, the upstanding character that he is, he was saying to me today that:

 

“I want to sue these cunts, get as much money out of them as possible and then put that money away. So the next time someone gets arrested, they’ve got money to support them like the people who supported me.”

 

So he’s already like looking to be altruistic and pay it forward rather than just, I don’t know, sit on the cash, which he’s entitled to. So top bloke Stephen Wells! But it’s, I think he’s quite happy to do four months in prison and have a kind of epic story that inspires people and then go and collect money from ZOG and put it in the White Australia kitty, and so on. And now we’ve got standing to go to the High Court as I said.

 

So realistically we’ve taken a lot of wins here for not much suffering. I mean he had to suffer in prison. But the rest of us, we didn’t really need to suffer like we had minor inconveniences basically that we had to suffer. But the positive outcome from all of this has been to I think win a lot of sympathy in the public and gain a bit of legal leverage that we can now use.

 

Because when we set up this political party, obviously we’re contesting elections and it’s probably not going to be realistic that we’re going to go in and win government at the first election that we contest. Right? So we need something to do other than just march around and declare what we believe and try and get someone to vote for us.

 

And so these legal cases, not just these ones, but probably, I anticipate once we form the political party, there could be other High Court cases where they’re trying to take guns away from people who associate with us. We’re probably going to have to go to the High Court to try and protect their gun rights. There’s going to be stuff to do with the de-banking. Tom was saying he was intending on taking to the High Court. Then also, if we register our political party and then we have accounts on Instagram, Twitter, Facebook and so on, and they try to de-platform us, were currently de-platformed from these websites, well, then we’ve also got standing to go to the High Court and say these companies are basically impairing representative democracy, which is unconstitutional. They’re impairing our right to political communication. As a registered political party in Australia, how can Australians have a representative democracy if their own political parties can’t even communicate to the voters what their policies are? So we’d have a very strong case there.

 

I think that would have a lot of sympathy in the community because there’s so much push in the state at every level to increase censorship on the Internet. And this could be one of the only ways really to strike back without taking power and reversing all these laws and getting rid of the eSafety Commission and all this garbage, would be to try and get to the High Court and get a decision that would establish precedent that would limit state overreach and the overreach of these big tech companies.

 

So these legal battles are going to be very important for us going forward and if we can have some successes or at least, you know, stand up sympathetically for our rights as Australians, could be a great way to also raise a lot of support for the party and the movement in general to see that we’re trying to engage in productive battles to defend the rights and freedoms of Australians, even outside of political power.

 

[18:28]

 

Blair Cottrell: If I’m understanding correctly, Tom, you’re now a free man, limited by no legal conditions of association. You can now train with the boys, you can associate with who you want. I’m imagining this because you’re on the stream with us for the first time in a while. The reason you haven’t been able to jump onto the stream with Joel or I, or with Joel specifically, is because he’s a member of your organisation. Am I right in believing this? You’re a free man now? Well to some extent.

 

Thomas Sewell: Relatively, yeah. I’m not currently having my political communication suppressed by the Magistrates Court, but I do still have three pending court cases regarding other matters that are, like including the so-called offensive behaviour in Ballarat. Doing a political demonstration in Ballarat. Jacob Hersant’s also been charged with offensive behaviour for a rally he did in Melbourne CBD So those two rallies, both rally leaders or rally spokespersons, like the speakers of both those rallies have been charged. Myself and Jacob. Joel, have you been charged yet with offensive behaviour?

 

Joel Davis: No, they’re still investigating me for the jews Hate Freedom rally. But they’ve got 12 months, so they can basically, … They’re also investigating me for offensive behaviour also for when we had the boys, my rabbi friends, and we went down and endorsed the Liberal Party at the last election. And yeah, so we’ll see if they end up charging me on those, but we don’t know yet.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, so another tactic they’re using, Blair, is they’re confusing political speech with like public misconduct.

 

So they’re trying to use laws that stop you from mooning a police officer or something silly like that. Or I think it’s like really bad swearing or something like that. They’re trying to use these laws to prevent political communication. The same way in Adelaide they tried to use loitering as a law to stop us from politically communicating.

 

But yeah, so I’m on bail for those and I have trials upcoming this year for those cases. But yeah, I’m allowed to associate at this stage. Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: I watch updates on Australian like motorcycle clubs sometimes just like Crime Updates, news on YouTube. It’s just a side interest of mine and I can’t help but notice that I think they’re trying to treat you guys the same way they treat some of these so-called outlaw motorcycle clubs. Because in Australia, if you don’t know, we have bikie gangs. In Queensland specifically, I’m pretty sure there’s strong legislation making it very difficult for those gangs to operate. I’m pretty sure you can’t even have a gang or MC club logo or insignia. Like you can’t even display it publicly. Or even have it in your house. If they know you’ve got it, they’ll raid you and take your jumper because it has a club logo on it.

 

And I’m just noticing similarities between the way the police treat you guys down here. It’s like they want you to be an outlaw gang and they expect to be able to get away with treating a political organisation which in the near future will be a registered political party, like they’re an outlaw gang. And I don’t think that’s going to fly. There’s no precedent in Australian legal history where that’s being tolerated by serious levels of court.

 

Of course, magistrates levels of court seem to tolerate whatever they’re told to tolerate. But I think once you get to county and beyond, you’ll probably see some judges and some outcomes that are more favourable to what is fair and actually legally applicable for you guys.

 

So, yeah, I’m glad you’re out! Well out of the conditions that were binding you and I’m glad you’re able to join us again.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s going to be the main thing on our agenda? What are we going to go on with lads?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I think the big thing to discuss this week in international politics is the way that Trump is trying to really unsuccessfully sweep the whole Jeffrey Epstein thing under the rug. I mean, obviously the cover-up has been successful. They’ve managed to, well first the FBI and the Attorney General of the United States came out last week and said:

 

“Oh, the Epstein files, they don’t actually don’t exist. We’ve concluded our investigation and they don’t exist!”

 

Just tried to gaslight everyone. And obviously the reaction from just everyone in the world basically was:

 

“What do you mean they don’t exist?”

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, explain to me, Joel, explain to me. And for the audience, to make it simple, what are the Epstein files? What do they consist of? Is it a list of clients that were in a prostitution ring? Because that’s my understanding. Is that right?

 

[23:23]

 

Joel Davis: I’m sure the files contain a lot more than just that.

 

But obviously the files would contain names of who’s going there and there’s been all these allegations that potentially these people are named and those people like Bill Clinton or Prince Andrew and blah, blah, blah, and photos of different elites and that were involved with Jeffrey Epstein and so on, and people going to the island, the flight logs, the so-called Lolita Express that was taking all these people out to this private island in the Caribbean. But obviously we don’t know what’s in the files because the files have not been released. Right.

 

But there was a promise before the last election that if Trump was to win, the files would be released, which no one intelligent believed. But even like Donald Trump Jr. was saying:

 

“Release the files!”

 

You know, blah, blah, blah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And now they’re saying there are no files. Is that right

 

Joel Davis: No, they’re not actually saying that now. Now they said that. And then a few days later, Trump changed the narrative to, not there are no files, to:

 

“Well, the Democrats they’ve concocted fake documents!”

 

And the whole Jeffrey Epstein thing apparently is a Democrat op, just like the Steele dossier and blah, blah, blah. And:

 

“It’s a hoax and it’s a political witch hunt and all this stuff trying to undermine me!”

 

He’s trying to spin it like this. But it’s ridiculous!

 

Number one, because Jeffrey Epstein committed, quote, unquote, “suicide”. You know, no one really believes that he killed himself.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh yeah, I heard the footage that they had of him in jail. Someone ran it through a metadata analysis and found that it had been edited several times. They could even tell the programme it was edited with. So the stuff that they released or had regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s suicide has all been doctored and edited. That’s not the real footage of his so-called suicide.

 

Joel Davis: Well, also, when that occurred he was under the Attorney General of the United States was Bill Barr. Bill Barr’s father, by the way, employed Jeffrey Epstein a long time ago and they have long, deep family connections to one another. Bill Barr was made Attorney General of the United States by Trump. He was in the Trump administration and he was the one running the Department of Justice who had Jeffrey Epstein incarcerated.

 

So it was under his watch that Jeffrey Epstein was killed and it was under his watch that it wasn’t investigated and that it was covered up.

 

So the Trump administration covered this up to begin with. Also, Donald Trump himself was friends with Jeffrey Epstein from the 1980s onwards. They allegedly, their friendship allegedly broke down in the 2000s because they had a dispute like Trump bought some condo in Palm beach in Florida that Jeffrey Epstein wanted to buy and they had some dispute. But they were very close friends. There’s lots of video footage showing this and Jeffrey Epstein even described Donald Trump as his “best friend” at one point in the 1990s.

 

So that’s obviously very important to bring up.

 

And also there’s plenty of people in the Trump administration or around Trump, like Trump’s Lawyer Alan Dershowitz, who is a jew and who was one of the main lawyers working on the whole election fraud, so-called lawsuits and so on after the 2020 election. He was also Jeffrey Epstein’s Lawyer and apparently went to the island and so on. There’s just so many connections between Trump and Epstein and Trump’s original administration and associates and Jeffrey Epstein. The list just goes on. We could do a whole stream just detailing all this stuff. So move forward.

 

Obviously there’s a lot of Democrats that are implicated in this too, like the Clintons and so on. So the Democrats aren’t going to release the files. The Democrats aren’t going to hold people to account for what’s happened here either.

 

But Trump is saying because the Democrats were sitting on the files over the last four years, magically they’ve changed them all and he doesn’t want to release them because apparently he’s basically admitting guilt that he’s in the files.

 

Elon Musk came out a few weeks ago and said they’re not being released because Trump’s in the files. Put the pressure on Trump after they fell out. And the pressure is telling, because now while Trump is every day coming out saying:

 

“No one cares about Jeffrey Epstein, everyone needs to stop talking about it.”

 

And so on. We’re seeing more and more elements of his base, of his movement turning on him. Tucker Carlson is giving speeches.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I turn on my YouTube. I don’t even watch stuff in relation to Jeffrey Epstein. I know almost nothing about it. I know what most people would know that is that there is some sort of list or documents implicating people in very unethical activities, probably for the purposes of Israeli blackmail and influence over American politicians. That’s what I know. And I turn on my YouTube and all throughout my recommended videos is people that usually do streams on video games or conspiracies who don’t even usually talk about this stuff, like doing videos on this stuff. So it’s just across the board. Have you seen much of it?

 

Joel Davis: I saw an opinion poll by the way of Americans:

 

“And do you agree with how Trump is handling the Jeffrey Epstein case?”

 

And it was like 12% said yes. So he’s lost everyone. Like no one’s going along with this shit! But go ahead Tom.

 

Thomas Sewell: I don’t have anything to add on the Epstein thing. It’s obviously been covered. It’s my only observation, …

 

[28:55]

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you agree that it kind of feels really drawn out. It’s almost like I’m sick of hearing it. It’s like it’s been going on for so long and nothing’s ever come of it. Maybe they’re trying to create that feeling, just kind of make people feel fatigued.

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe. I think that it’s a weapon that both sides have used against each other.

 

So when the Democrats were in power with Biden, they had the Biden laptop scandal and they had obviously a lot of people in the Democrat Party were connected to Epstein and other people that were on the Lolita Express. A lot of a list celebrities are Democrats and they were all on the list.

 

And then now that Trump’s in power being, you know, turned back on Trump obviously photos way back in the day, like before the 2020 election came out that showed Trump as friends with Epstein and Trump making comments about how Epstein’s got a particular taste in younger women. And Trump was saying that he kind of agreed with it. It was a bit incriminating. You know, if you were Italian, there’d be plausible deniability that you’re talking about 18 year olds or something. Anyway, I digress.

 

I think that it’s interesting to see a mega civil war or MAGA civil war, however you want to pronounce it. I think it’s good to see that there are these kind of Qtard, you know, conspiracy theorist, you know, MAGAs or Make America Great Again camp that all of a sudden are telling people to move on from a legitimate conspiracies, a legitimate Mossad blackmail entrapment scheme. Because they always want you to focus on conspiracy theories, but just not the ones that are real. They want you to focus on nonsense and talk about Antarctic, well, not necessarily nonsense, but they want to talk you about side quest things like Antarctica and 5G and stuff like that.

 

But then this is just black and white! This is an Israeli Mossad blackmail scheme. It’s undeniable, it’s a fact. And these people want us to brush it under the table.

 

And it just shows that, yeah, the MAGA camp is dead. It ties in good timing as well with obviously the tension between, you know, Musk, who’s a power broker in the US and Donald Trump. And so seeing the MAGA camp fall apart is a good thing. It’s a good thing. And it’s a good thing for the same reason why we’ve worked so hard to destroy the Liberal Party here in Australia, successfully destroy the Liberal Party here in Australia.

 

Americans need a form of Right-wing, pro-White politics that is superior to Make America Great Again. They need a much harder and more staunch, more ideologically consistent. It’s not just a kind of cult of personality around Donald Trump. So I’m watching, I’m watching along.

 

Joel Davis: What was very interesting this week was Tucker Carlson gave a speech at the Turning Point USA event where he basically said Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad agent. And this is being swept under the rug. How come Israel can blackmail our politicians with sexual blackmail, with a paedophile ring, and there’s a conspiracy on both sides of politics to cover it up:

 

“How is this acceptable?”

 

And the crowd was going ballistic at this conservative event. At Charlie Kirk’s Hail Israel Hail ZOG conservative event. The crowd’s still going ballistic.

 

So there’s been a sea change where conservative political discourse in the United States has become dominated by dissident Right talking points ideas. And the younger generation of Right-wingers in the United States and I think everywhere are turning against the jews, against Israel. They’re more radical on racial issues. And Tucker Carlson coming out and doing that, basically he just pissed in Trump’s face. And then Trump came out this few days ago and said:

 

“Well, anyone who wants to talk about Epstein, I don’t want their support. They’re fake supporters and we’re done with them.”

 

So what is he saying? He doesn’t want Tucker Carlson support, doesn’t want the support of Matt Walsh. I saw Matt Walsh come out and criticise Trump on the same grounds. Like so many of these really big, like massive following influential conservative commentators that come out on the side of the people against Trump.

 

And so what this is the foundation of a new American Right, in my opinion, that moves beyond Trump, that embraces more radical talking points. And it seems like Elon Musk is willing to fund these guys too.

 

So it’s shaping up to be quite interesting to see how this develops over the next couple years because a lot of people thought after the last election, Peter Thiel got his J.D. Vance, you know, curry burner, vice president installed. And Trump will just basically bamboozle all the Boomers and all the masses with his charisma and his policies and everyone will de-radicalise and then JD Vance will end up just being the heir to the throne and then he’ll become president and they’ll just hold this paradigm of politics down on lock for the next decade and we’re just going to have to eat the slop.

 

Well, actually, I don’t think so. actually, this has completely blown things up and now it seems like a more radical challenger could emerge to take the throne off The Prince.

 

So it’s quite interesting to observe.

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you guys think about, because you mentioned Tucker Carlson. What do you guys think about Tucker Carlson? What’s his game? Because his message has become more explicit in the last year or so. and where does he stand? Do you trust him?

 

[35:03]

 

Thomas Sewell: No! [chuckling] I don’t trust him.

 

But it’s an improvement of controlled opposition, certainly. If the controlled opposition has to continue moving further and further to our direction, well, eventually they’ll have to run a controlled opposition which is just a copy of us.

 

And I think people will choose the real us over the controlled opposition copy of us, when it gets to that point.

 

So, yeah, it’s a good to see, it’s very good to see the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Battle there is to continue existing. Yeah, because they won’t want you to exist. Right. But if he’s controlled opposition, Tucker Carlson, who’s controlling him, do you think? What are your theories?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, I think he’s in the CIA. Yeah, I think he’s in the CIA.

 

So I think he’s part of a different faction within the Deep State. And I think Trump was an independent person that was being influenced by different factions within the CIA.

 

And I think that perhaps they’re jumping ship from Trump. I don’t think that Tucker Carlson is entirely aligned with Musk, for example. I think he’s kind of like a fourth party when you think about it. I don’t know too much about Democrat politics, but I think the Right-wing is moving in an odd direction where there’s the Trump camp, there’s the Musk camp, and there’s the, what you could call like the Tucker camp. And I think those are the three most powerful forces in the American Right.

 

Blair Cottrell: I expect you have your reasons for believing that. There’s probably plenty of information that suggests that. I haven’t personally looked into it. What do you think, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: His father was a CIA agent. That’s confirmed. And then Tucker himself said that he wanted to join the CIA in the 1990s when he finished college, but he didn’t make the grade, apparently. He didn’t get the contract. So then he decided to become a journalist. But that seems, I don’t know [chuckling] if I believe that story.

 

Thomas Sewell: Bullshit!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Bullshit, because the CIA are desperate for recruits, and especially recruits with a high IQ, which he has. And it’s a fact that the CIA hires thousands and thousands of journalists a year. Hires people to become journalists.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. There’s something called Operation Mockingbird. Google it. Yeah. If you don’t know what it is.

 

Thomas Sewell: I mean, it’s slightly different, but it’s on the same talking point. You know, the Director General of ASIO only two or three years ago came out in a Senate inquiry and said that:

 

“They employ journalists, that they could be a journalist, they could be a teacher, they could be whatever, and they’re actually secretly an ASIO agent. We’re everywhere, basically.”

 

And in the case of journalism, it’s very important to have intelligence services control journalism. That’s probably the key industry for intelligence services to control.

 

Joel Davis: Also, if you want to understand Tucker Carlson’s motivations, I think the motivations could be understood if he is like a CIA operative or at least connected to the Deep State, is geopolitical.

 

So what does Tucker Carlson basically do with his influence? He plays down the whole Russia thing, criticises Zelensky, criticises funding the war in Ukraine. Now he’s criticising Israel and the involvement with Israel.

 

But he’s also always been a China hawk who has been very consistent that China is the real threat. America needs to focus on fighting China. And there’s other elements in the Trump administration and across the American Right who have that view. Elbridge Colby, who’s the Undersecretary of Defense, he’s been saying that for years, and now he’s the Under Secretary of Defense. He just came out the other day demanding that Australia and Japan commit to fighting alongside the United States if Taiwan is invaded, to give you an idea of what he’s all about. And he’s also the main guy in the Trump administration trying to block assistance to Ukraine and so on, because he thinks it’s taking away from a deterrent and potential action against China in vis a vis Taiwan.

 

So Tucker Carlson comes along and he can kind of wrangle the Crown by pushing this kind of anti-Ukraine, anti-Israel, which are both very popular with conservatives Angles in order to kind of push for a war with China or China, Hawking, at the very least, in addition to having a very kind of patriotic, you know, style and so on. You can see why the CIA would look upon him as someone or look upon that style of politics as something that they would support because they would see it maybe as in the geopolitical interests of the United States. And that’s what the CIA is fundamentally like. It’s fundamental reason for existing is basically keeping America the global hegemon.

 

Blair Cottrell: For our American viewers, I know we’ve had Thomas Rousseau on the show, leader of Patriot Front. Is he the primary guy, organisation, political faction or personality you guys would endorse in America? Is there someone else? Is he the main man? I mean, who’s the real deal?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, Thomas is, and Patriot Front is the most organised and they are the largest White nationalist group in the United States. They hold their cards a little bit closer to their chest than us in terms of their ideology. They keep things a little bit more “heritage American”, as they say. And that’s their strategy. It’s kind of like a halfway point between what we’re doing and the United Patriots Front, obviously, without UPF being a purely anti-Islam movement, it being a Patriot Front. So it, yeah, it’s definitely a specific tactic that he’s using and he’s done quite well with it. And they continue to grow.

 

There are a lot of other organisations. The Rob Rundo active club model was quite large and it’s all across the country. So their groupings are a lot smaller. You know, you’re talking usually five to ten guys at a time, but there are hundreds of groups of five to 10 guys.

 

And then you have Hammer, doing Blood Tribe. So we get accused of being wignats, but we’re pretty light on the wignatory compared to particular people in America.

 

And you’ve got all sorts of groups. You’ve got Wagner’s group, you’ve got Volkers Resistance Movement, you’ve got, … There’s a lot of groups in the United States. It’s very different to Australia in that sense. We’ve kind of co-ordinated all of the White nationalist energy all into one body, which has its pros and cons.

 

But in the United States, I think Patriot Front probably control 30 or 40% of the market, if you want to put it that way. But they certainly have over 90% of the visibility. What they’ve done very well is they’ve got the majority of the visibility.

 

[42:03]

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[2:38:14]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/24/2025 = 33)

Blitz007
6 days ago
these people are great and we need more of em
18 likes

Report
WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
6 days ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE
12 likes

Report
Strueth
6 days ago
Thanks guys, I love listening to your chats… I don’t feel so alone in our country knowing you have our backs and are willing to stand up for our white Australia… I long for how it was in the 70’s… we had it all, and slowly it’s been taken right out from under us, betrayed by those wimps in parliament… Thank you
9 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
4 days ago
The fuckery really kicked off with Whitlam. Constitutional vandalism which needs to be addressed. That was when the gloves came off with Vietnamese immigration and demoralising ‘liberal’ law pushes. We were ruled by TV and under the oogabooga blues spell.
2 likes

Report
StevenGurr
6 days ago
Absolute total bullshit Sick of these cunt pigs and courts. Loitering isn’t even an arrestable offence and then to continue adding simple offences is a joke. And further to add non association conditions on the bail is totalitarian shit. Keep up the fight and go after every individual pig, judge and state lawyer involved.
5 likes

Report
Dissident_Loner
Supporter
6 days ago
Hey! The Three Amigos!
2 likes

Report
Restlessdreams88
6 days ago
88 .
1 like

Report
mharrison52
6 days ago
rome, pheonixian, ancient arayans in India. Mexica, Brazil, All of central and south america. America and Candada now. every great white civilization has ended the same way mongrolzation then conplete collapse. It’s a trend about whites that we cant afford to mistake again. in aglobal society there are no where to go. global genocide.
1 like

Report
Sieger88
6 days ago
Unfortunately Aston Martin is now owned by the kíke Strulović
0 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
paceytarzan
6 days ago
Sieg
0 likes

Report
Winstein_Synagoguehill
6 days ago
Luxury and comfort made the yankees soft. There’s not much of a White working class in the USA. Most working class are Amerindian and African. Go into a boxing gym in the USA and there’s not a single White person. Completely reversed from Britain and Ireland. American families the mother is usually the boss and dad has been cucked to a little muted nub.
0 likes

Report
KeithyFM
5 days ago
Turks and Greeks… chalk n cheese. Turks should be back in Turkmenistan.
0 likes

Report
Motion937
5 days ago
The mustache without the beard looks goofy with the shaved head.
0 likes

Report
Motown88
Supporter
4 days ago
Yes there are young women that have resisted the feminist conditioning, 5 of them are my daughters… and I’m so proud.
0 likes

Report
deputydawg000
4 days ago
CritalEyeMMA on youtube and AntiwokeMMA on rumble is also worth a look. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iz_LOvsbMiM https://rumble.com/v6w0l5s-livestream-one-year-anniversary.-its-the-jews.-race-realism-live-stream.html?e9s=src_v1_wh&playlist_id=watch-history
0 likes

Report
Orangejoos
4 days ago
Very pragmatic , and informed discussion . Always appreciate the three of you. I’m only informed by Nick otherwise , the rest is almost entirely bullshit or toxic. Thanks — for all you hero’s do.
0 likes

Report
wyrdweasel
3 days ago
I think that you have had to do something blackmailable in order to be able to do business at the highest level and to join the club. When everyone in that circle has something on everyone else, there would be a certain kind of mutual insurance when it comes to the threat of exposure.
0 likes

Report
empowerprivate
2 days ago
Rabbis, when they are sucking blood out, it’s Adrenochrome.
0 likes

Report
Restlessdreams88
19 hours ago
Gotta get Jacob on more
0 likes

Report
katana17
6 days ago
[Joel Davis – MechaHitler – a Manifestation of Musk’s Machiavellianism, or Something More? – Jul 11, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/07/17/joel-davis-mechahitler-a-manifestation-of-musks-machiavellianism-or-something-more-jul-11-2025-transcript/
-1 like

Delete
mharrison52
6 days ago
aTom has Aura like an Anglo Addy
-1 like

Report
hueyvam123
6 days ago
The best. Great to see the gang back together again.
-1 like

Report
EarthlingCarl
5 days ago
No hate but is Joel rocking a comb over?
-1 like

Report
RadicalAIAgenda
5 days ago

-1 like

Report
whitehonkymonkey
5 days ago
hello lads,good to see the crew back together. though it feels like a win with the courts,its all about getting rid of us on the day. they don’t give a f… about the arrests not sticking ,as long as they pull you off the street on the day. your tactics also need to create distractions when out protesting. create confusion. keep it up lads.
-1 like

Report
BasedNapoleon
5 days ago
Just watched ‘Latham at Large’ where Mark Latham featured as a guest journalist on 60 minutes covering the 2010 election between Tony Abbott and Julia Gillard. He deconstructed the campaign process and pressed Abbott about migration.
-1 like

Report
UncircumcisedCircus
5 days ago
I do think there is a waspy faction of the CIA that doesnt want to always take orders from the Mossad.
-1 like

Report
DaveScribe
5 days ago
Blair, all it takes is an accusation. Ironic since you were accused of stalking by a woman who was stalking you. It’s not uncommon for the perpetrator to call the police first in order to allay suspicion off from themself. I was in a holding cell with a middle aged white engineer who had a knife pulled on him by his neighbor. The neighbor called the cops first & got the engineer arrested.
-1 like

Report
Motown88
Supporter
4 days ago
Great stream guys, thanks
-1 like

Report
ProvingNihil
4 days ago
Would love to meet white nationalists in my area but can’t find any in my state.
-1 like

Report
ProvingNihil
4 days ago
Also when dating a woman, hell or just interacting with anyone in general. I personally record it on my GoPro, yeah it’s a tad bit weird some people don’t understand, but you never know what will happen, especially with women.
-1 like

Report
Makulatoren
VerifiedSupporter+
4 days ago
I disagree with Thomas about Tucker Carlson. The CIA would never betray the mossad in that way of having matyr made on. Because then they would lose their Epstein tickets. Tucker is just acting like the average boomer. He wants to back to the american ideal but knows deep down that it was fake. Yet he still yerns for it.
-1 like

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: Okay, we should be live. It is the 4th of July, so if we’re in America, it would be Independence Day. But Obviously in Australia, 4th of July doesn’t mean anything. And interesting show for you tonight, I hope. Big show for you this evening, even though we are missing Blair. There’s a lot I wanted to break down, a lot I wanted to discuss. Blair’s sick, so I gave him the night off and decided to ride solo for this one.

 

So, yeah, you’re going to be getting two hours of me yapping, but presumably that’s what you’re all here for. So, sorry, I don’t have any Blair to kind of break it up. But it is what it is. The man’s sick. I think Mark Collett made him get out of bed early the 4 o’ clock in the morning or whatever for a Mark Collett stream the other day. And it kind of tipped him over the edge. It is winter down here in Australia and so he’s a bit under the weather.

 

But yeah, there’s a few big stories I wanted to touch tonight. The main thing I wanted to do, I’ve been doing a bit of a deep dive into Chinese politics lately and the last few days because there’s a lot of very interesting kind of subtle dynamics going on there. And it’s really interesting precisely because the timetable for potentially World War III kind of hinges upon Chinese politics. And that has massive implications for Australia, for America, for the world. So it’s hard to get good information and to kind of break through all the propaganda on both sides and figure out what’s happening because of the nature of the Chinese system. But I’ve done a considerable amount of reading and study.

 

And so I was going to set out my preliminary analysis this evening for all of you to kind of like red pill you on recent developments in China and what’s potentially happening and what to look for over the next few months as more signs will become evident as to what direction things are going at in Chinese politics where potentially, yeah, a lot hinges on kind of what happens over the next few months.

 

But before I get into that, there’s a few other stories. There’s a shocking story here in Australia with this, I think probably the most egregious child rape paedophile allegations I can remember in Australia. So there’s probably been something worse over the years, but I just don’t remember anything as bad as this. I pull this up here from The Noticer:

 

“Homosexual childcare worker charged with raping eight babies and toddlers. A homosexual child care worker has been charged with sexually abusing babies and toddlers at a child care centre in Point Cook, Melbourne. Alleged child rapist Joshua Dale Brown, 26, was arrested on May 12 and charged with 70 child sex offences against eight children aged between five months and two years old at Creative Gardens Early Learning centre, Point Cook between April 2022 and January 2023. The charges included sexual penetration of a child under 12, sexual assault, sexual activity in the presence of a child, possess child abuse material for use through a carriage service and possess child abuse material. Brown, who appeared with pink and blue dyed hair in a Facebook photo with his boyfriend during the same time period he worked at the Point Cook centre, had no criminal record and had a valid working with children check. It has since been cancelled.”

 

“Victoria police said on Tuesday they are now investigating whether there are more victims as Brown worked at 20 child care centres around Melbourne between January 2017 and May 2025 and are examining evidence of an allegation at a second centre at Essendon. The alleged child sex predator appears in a photo at that centre shared on its Facebook page on March 21st for so-called Harmony Day with the caption, quote, ‘today we recognise Australia’s cultural diversity’. Brown also tested positive for a sexually transmitted disease and authorities have contacted the families of 1200 children who attended the same child care centres to urge them to get tested. The alleged paedophile first appeared in court in May, but a suppression order issued by Magistrate Michael White and applied for by police and the Office of Public Prosecutions meant the case could not be made public at the time.”

 

“But as the investigation has developed in scale, the need to notify more than 2, 600 families as a precaution became apparent. Suppression order was therefore revoked and police announced the charges and made the unusual decision to release the alleged child rapist name.”

 

Yeah, anyway, you can go read the whole thing on Noticer. I mean I read most of it, but I mean horrific! And look at, he’s gone to so many different child care centres. He’s flip-flopping around doing days at all these different child care centres.

 

And so now thousands of parents have to get their children tested for STDs. This is beyond fucked up! Like it’s actually like it’s hard to even believe this is even real from my point of view. Like it’s hard to, I mean I’m not denying that it’s real. It’s obviously real, but it’s hard to fathom. It’s hard to come to terms with that this is real, this is happening. And there’s a lot of obvious things that one could say about this. Right? You know, I’ve heard calls for:

 

“Oh, we need to ban men from working in child care centres!”

 

Probably not the most unreasonable thing in the world, but, like, wouldn’t that break, like, discrimination laws? The kind of contradictions of the system are kind of being shown up there. You know, obviously gay dudes, highly disproportionately paedophiles. That discussion has been opening up.

 

[06:20]

 

But I think the real discussions that are important here and that are pertinent here, are these. Number one, nobody in Australian politics with any kind of power or influence, no major political party is calling for the death penalty. This guy is raping kids. Some of them haven’t even turned one. This guy is raping children that young in a systematic, predatory way and filming it. He needs to die! Like, I don’t. Who’s going to come and debate me on this subject? Who’s going to offer the counter argument, no, we need to keep this guy alive. For what reason?

 

Pedophiles need to be executed. But particularly it’s a case like this. I mean it’s. How is it even, … Why the fuck did we get rid of the death penalty? And it’s just putrid that we have to breathe the same air that this scum breathes. It’s unacceptable. It’s an insult to the honour of our nation that someone can commit crimes like this against our children and stay alive. He needs to die! He needs to be put to death. Obviously the system won’t do that. And I’m seeing barely anyone call for this.

 

When we launch our political party. This is going to be one of key items on our platform. I think this is a message, a national conversation that we need to have. I think pretty much everyone in Australia agrees we need to put child rapists to death.

 

So that’s going to be one of the key issues I think that we’re going to attack, because we just need a far more serious response.

 

I mean, there’s too many cases. I mean, this person hasn’t been caught before, but there’s been too many cases of child rapists that have gone to jail, served short jail sentences, where they get held in protective custody so the other prisoners don’t kill them, released back into the community and then reoffend.

 

I mean, how is this even happening? How are we ever releasing someone who is a child rapist back onto the street ever! Like that’s just insane! That’s insane! It begs the question, the people making these decisions, why are they so lenient? Is it because they themselves are engaging in this kind of behaviour? Why are politicians not doing anything about this? Is it because they themselves are engaging in this kind of behaviour? It really does beg the question. Why else would you try to protect paedophiles unless you are one yourself, or you’re working with them in some systematic way or somethings surely this is something that we can all agree on. Left-wing, Right-wing. It’s just disgusting!

 

I mean, second thing that I also would like to say about this is another key policy that we’re going to be putting forward in this country. We have the child care rebate. Now I’ll look into this. Actually, I’ll look it up right now. How much is the average child care rebate a year for working mothers in Australia? Looking it up right now. So there’s child care studies, subsidies.

 

So the child care subsidy percentage decreases as family income increases. For instance, families earning up to 80,000 may receive up to a 90% subsidy, while those earning above $530,000 a year are not eligible. So what it’s saying here is, basically if you earning like an average wage, the government basically pays for your kid to go to childcare. If you’ve got children under school age. Why are we paying? Like if the mother of the child literally can’t afford to pay for child care, why are we subsidizing that? Why don’t instead of paying mothers to dump their kids at like random child care centres run by foreigners infested with paedophiles so they can get raped? How about instead of that, we pay that money to mothers to stay home and take care of their own children.

 

In society today you can be moralistic about it. Mothers should be taking care of their own children. And I agree with that. But obviously economically it’s quite difficult today to have stay at home mothers. You know, it’s difficult to raise a family on one income and for many reasons related to cost of living.

 

So what’s the number one thing that we could do if we want to increase the birth rate and protect children, pay mothers to stay home! I think that’d be an incredibly popular policy. Popular with women and with men. Right? Most men would like their missus to stay home and take care of the house and take care of the kids. The state should pay. That’s a social good. The state should pay for it. Taxpayers, I’d rather pay my taxes so that White mothers can stay at home raising White babies, then paying child care subsidies so they can go and work and send their kid off to some like, paedophile rape centre. So we can protect the kids. We can get the mothers back in the homes so the kids are raised properly. People will have more children because women, won’t be as busy with their careers. They’ll be able to have more children, feel more comfortable to have more children, be incentivised to have more children because they’ll probably get bigger payments the more children they have.

 

And then we won’t need immigration anymore to expand the population. I mean, it’s just a beautiful policy. Everyone wins. It’d be an expensive policy, but we’ve got like 15% of the country on NDIS, the disability insurance scheme. Most of them are rorting it. Most of them are capable of working and just have like a diagnosis, like a bullshit, like psychology diagnosis to allow them to just grift off the system. Got all these like immigrants that come here from the Middle East and just sit on Centerlink grift off that. So many people are grifting off this system. If we shut down all those grifts and redirected that money to young White mothers to have White babies. I’d much rather they be the ones grifting. I’d much rather reproduction be the grift. A lot of people say:

 

“Oh, how are you going to get women to vote for Nazis? How are you going to get women to vote for nationalism?”

 

I think this is a pretty fucking good policy that we can get their votes on, but men as well. We want to be able to bring back the Australian dream, raising a family on one income.

 

[12:56]

 

So I think this issue here really just illustrates how great policies like this just don’t exist in the political system. Like, no one’s really interested in trying to fix the major social problems of our time that have very simple solutions that no one talks about, no one thinks of, that would be 90% of the country behind you, popular. So I think we can really do some damage in a political system like this, presenting these kinds of ideas to the people.

 

I think a lot of people are going to be very pleasantly surprised:

 

“How come the Nazis have such good policies? What the fuck!”

 

And yeah, we can hopefully move the debate onto our terms. And yeah, but I mean, just disgusting the story. I mean, what else can you say about it? We just got to kill this fucker. We’re not advocating for to do anything illegal, but he needs to be legally executed, anyway.

 

Another I’m not going to go into another issue. I’m going to focus on this China thing because there’s a lot to unpack.

 

So basically what I’ve been looking into lately is there’s been a lot of rumours swirling that President Xi Jinping in China is, his power is being curtailed, basically. That his grip on power is significantly slipping, that other elements within the Chinese Communist Party are reasserting themselves. And there’s many reasons why people are suspecting this. And I heard this at first months ago and I suspected it was Western propaganda and the type of thing you hear all the time:

 

“Oh, Vladimir Putin is going to drop dead, he has cancer, he’ll die within six months!”

 

Or you hear these kinds of stories all the time, but very rarely does anything materialise. So I didn’t really look into it too much because I kind of dismissed it as typical Western propaganda. But after taking a serious look at what these people are saying, I think that are calling this out, it does seem that there’s no smoke without fire on this. It does seem like there’s something to there’s been a whole series of purges of high ranking members of the PLA, the Chinese military, of generals appointed by Xi, that was, Xi loyalists that have been taken out, whether they’ve died, been in prison, disappeared from public life, been forced to step down, what have you. A very large amount of these things have occurred.

 

There’s been more critique on Xi’s policies in Chinese major publications, particularly his policy on Taiwan, but also his economic policies. And yeah, the Chinese economy isn’t doing so well. They’re hurdling towards potentially a major war with the United States over Taiwan. If they play that situation in a particular way.

 

And so it would make sense actually that certain elements within the party would maybe try to assert themselves at this time. Apparently rumours were, because basically the way that the Chinese system works, every five years you have, they have like a big, you know, general meeting, like conference where all the members of the party come together and like all the senior members of the party and like vote on the direction of the party and so on. And the last time this happened was in 2022.

 

And I remember at the time it was significant because the previous president, Hu Jintao, was kind of publicly disgraced. Xi kind of ceremonially in front of all the cameras, had him kind of like marched out of the meeting. And he represents like the Communist Youth League faction, which is a faction of more moderate elements within the Chinese Communist Party. Xi’s faction is more nationalistic and militaristic and authoritarian, whereas this other faction is more liberal in the sense that obviously they’re still communists and they’re still like technically and they still support like a one party state, but they support more economic liberalisation, more capitalism, more opening of China to foreign markets, a better kind of better relationship with the United States, a less hostile relationship with the United States, and they want to maintain more kind of stability and diplomacy for foreign policy, economic policy, etc. And Xi kind of won out against them.

 

And then over the years since he became president has made a series of moves to essentially like stack the party with loyalists to him and to his agenda and kind of sideline all these other factions. And leaders of these old factions often get referred to as the so-called party elders now because they once held the highest positions in the party and are very famous in China. And you know, they’ve made note kind of in subtle ways, they don’t explicitly criticise the party or Xi, but in subtle ways they make it known that they don’t approve of Xi’s militarism towards Taiwan and kind of more aggressive and assertive foreign policy.

 

[18:45]

 

But what’s interesting is that at the, as I said, every five years they have a big meeting and then they have what they call plenary sessions, which are their like major meetings that they have once every year or like less than every year, maybe every 10 months or so, roughly speaking, I can’t remember exactly. And it’s kind of like the leaders of the party get together and decide what the direction of the party is going to be.

 

At the most recent of these meetings last year, there were all these rumours that he was sick. There wasn’t very much footage put out by Chinese State media of him really doing anything at the meeting or presiding over much. And it was presented that these party elders, so to speak, that Xi had sidelined were now involved and were talking at the meeting and were, and it was kind of spun:

 

“Oh, Xi is trying to show unity by being graceful and allowing his old fashioned rivals to come and participate in the plenary session.”

 

But in retrospect that seems like a cope, because ever since that plenary session, Xi’s public role has greatly diminished. Recently they just had like a BRICS meeting. He didn’t even go. And there’s been several big events and big meetings where he hasn’t really attended. Many are speculating he has health issues, which is probably part of that.

 

But let’s say he does have health issues. He has no obvious successor. It would make sense that that would undermine him, people’s confidence in him and his agenda. Because if he’s gonna drop dead or become too sick to be president, then the obvious question of, well, who’s going to take over from him comes into play. And it seems like elements within the elite, even though many of them were allies of Xi at one time or another, many of them have turned against him.

 

One of these, according to rumours, top military figures that have turned against him is General Zhang Yuga, which is basically the most senior kind of military figure in China. You know, basically only Xi really outranks him in military matters. He is the Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission.

 

And basically it’s the guy that’s like running the military. He’s kind of getting on a bit. He’s getting old. I think he’s in his 70s, and he was kind of in line to be potentially replaced by generals that were installed by Xi below him. And I can’t remember all the Chinese names. I’m not going to like list off all the names, but basically those guys that were kind of earmarked to kind of succeed him, and everyone was expecting to succeed him, have recently been purged. They’re Xi loyalists, which has kind of been shocking news, and many other high ranking officials across the military.

 

Meanwhile, Zhang Yuga in his public statements on Taiwan is a very different line to Xi. I can break this down a little bit. Xi’s vision on Taiwan, which is kind of nuanced and complex. So since Xi has come to power, his rhetoric on Taiwan has become progressively more and more aggressive. It kind of peaked just before Covid then it kind of let off a little bit, and then once Covid was over, it’s been even more aggressive.

 

So Taiwan, for those who don’t know, according to the official position of the Taiwanese government and the official position of the Chinese government, Taiwan is not a separate country. Taiwan is a part of China, and it simply has a different government.

 

And this is a layover from after the Second World War. You had an alliance between the old Nationalist government and the Communists, where they ceased their civil war and made an alliance to fight the Japanese in World War II. After the Japanese were defeated, they went back to fighting each other. The Communists won. Mao Zedong took over China, established Communist China. And the Nationalists were essentially chased off the mainland onto the island of Taiwan in 1949 or whatever.

 

And at first, the Americans backed the Nationalists against the Communists. This is the beginning of the Cold War, as you might expect. There was even, like General MacArthur, I believe, proposed that the United States should nuke China to try and like, nip Communism in the bud, which probably would have been the right move in retrospect. It was chosen against. There was obviously the Korean War with the Chinese kind of helped North Koreans fight against South Koreans, which were backed by the United States and us and other Western powers.

 

And so there’s a lot of tension there. And there was a view that the Nationalists could maybe somehow get a foothold back in the mainland and take the mainland back from the Communists. And the Americans backed the Chinese government in absentia that basically had formed in Taiwan, that still had ambitions to go and take Beijing back and take China back.

 

But of course, that never materialised. And this was a kind of quasi fascistic, nationalist authoritarian regime that was running Taiwan, but backed by the United States.

 

Fast forward to the 70s when it became clear that the Nationalists were never going to take China back, and the Communist Party had kind of consolidated power. Then President Nixon and his Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, they normalised relations with China and they agreed, because basically they wanted to, during the Cold War, they wanted to basically drive a rift deeper between China and Russia or China and the Soviet Union. They noticed that the Soviet Union and China, even though they were both communist states, they didn’t see eye to eye on a lot of issues. Mao in particular, was very upset after Stalin died. Khrushchev took over the Soviet Union, put out the secret speech basically condemning Stalinism as excessively totalitarian and brutal and so on. He saw this as a betrayal of Communism and of the revolution. Mao, that is, and kind of viewed the Soviets as moderates, as kind of moderates who were infected with bourgeois sensibilities or whatever. And there was territorial disputes between the Chinese and the Soviet Union.

 

[25:31]

 

And so even though they were both communist states that were aligned in many ways, they didn’t see eye to eye. And the Americans saw this as an opportunity to go in there, make a deal with China, make an economic deal with China to normalise relations somewhat, get China hooked on trade with the United States, and therefore neutralise them to isolate the Soviet Union strategically. Obviously this was an effective strategy. The Cold War was over with less than two decades later, the Soviet Union collapsed.

 

But the United States never went back to re-isolating China or didn’t perpetuate the Cold War. Even though the communists were still in power in China. The Americans declared the Cold War was over, Communism was defeated, liberalism had won.

 

And then they adopted a policy of liberal internationalism, a policy that basically, if we just integrate the countries of the world into enough international institutions that are quote, unquote, “liberal” and integrate everyone’s economies with one another through the globalisation of international trade, and we had globalised culture and everyone gets kind of draughted into this Pax Americana-Judeo, global slop of the post Cold War, you know, Pax Americana, international order. The elites of every country in the world will develop so many business relationships and diplomatic relationships and so on with the elites of all the other countries in the world, mediated by America and the West. But they’re all basically just copy and paste liberal democracy into their societies, engage in liberal, democratic reforms. Everyone will become a liberal democracy, and they’ll all sit together at the UN and shake hands and we won’t have any major World Wars anymore. And everyone’s economies will become so interdependent with one another that they won’t want to go to war because their economies aren’t sufficiently isolated that they could take each other on.

 

Instead, they’re so dependent upon trade with other countries that they work out their problems diplomatically and we all sing Kumbaya and everyone’s like a liberal forever. And there’s no more wars and there’s no more evil dictators. And this is the bullshit vision that was put forward.

 

And so even though China was still a communist authoritarian state, the idea was:

 

“Well, if we just let China, we just pretend that the Chinese are cool and allow them to participate in all international liberalism and globalism, then eventually the Chinese elite will adopt liberal ideas and engage in liberal reforms and China will liberalise over time, and we won’t have to fight China and force them to kind of succumb to liberalism. They’ll do it organically.”

 

This was the theory. And it seemed to be kind of working for a time because the Chinese leadership did get progressively more liberal. Every new leader that came in was less and less authoritarian, less and less radical in terms of their Marxist beliefs, more and more open to economic liberalism, opening up Chinese markets. They didn’t, you know, create Democratic, liberal, democratic reforms, but they were more liberal on economics and they were more open on diplomacy. They weren’t very aggressive in asserting their interests on the world stage.

 

And so the Chinese were not viewed as a major threat. And the idea was that if we just make the Chinese and American economies so integrated and dependent upon one another that China relies upon selling cheap crap to the United States and America relies upon buying all these key items from China, this will create a kind of natural friendship and alliance that prevent the two states from going to war.

 

Then along comes the rise of President Xi in the early 2010s, early to mid 2010s. And Xi is a nationalist, Xi is an authoritarian and he had more aggressive views for China’s potential. For Xi the Chinese are the centre of the world. The Chinese traditionally and there’s some truth to this. For a lot of human history, China was the biggest and wealthiest empire on the planet. You know, the Chinese empires existed for literally like five millennia or something in various forms. They’re an ancient people, an ancient civilisation, and there’s 1.4 billion of them.

 

Imagine if all of Europe was integrated into one big like super state. That’s basically what China is in terms of its size and its complexity. And the view was:

 

“Well we’ve become so rich now through all of this economic development that we’ve done that we can invest that money in developing a modern military outfit that can compete with the United States and we can assert ourselves and the United States is falling. The United States has declining internal legitimacy, all these internal problems. We can rise and challenge the American led liberal international order with an assert a different way. And we can assert Chinese interests and try to dominate the Asian region and become the most powerful country in the world and kind of replace the United States as the top dog.”

 

And key to that is taking Taiwan.

 

So why is Taiwan key to it? Well, number one, it’s kind of like a disgrace to China that Taiwan, which they consider to be part of China, is being run by a now liberal democracy.

 

So after the Cold War ended, Taiwan shifted from being a one party authoritarian nationalist state to being a liberal democracy.

 

And so the Kuomintang, the old nationalists that used to run China and that pushed into Taiwan and were running Taiwan under Chiang Kai-shek* and so on, they now had to win an election of the Taiwanese people to hold on to government.

 

[* Chiang Kai-shek-Chinese politician, military leader, and President of Taiwan from 1950 to 1975 (1887–1975) Chiang Kai-shek was a Chinese politician, revolutionary, and general who led the Republic of China from 1928 until his death in 1975. His government was based in mainland China until it was defeated in the Chinese Civil War by the Chinese Communist Party in 1949, after which he continued to lead the Republic of China on the island of Taiwan. Chiang served as leader of the Nationalist Kuomintang party and the commander-in-chief of the National Revolutionary Army from 1926 until his death, during which he was known as Generalissimo. Wikipedia.]

 

[31:58]

 

And by the time you get to the 2000s, they start losing and you get the rise of the Democratic People’s Party or whatever it is, which is basically the Taiwanese libtards. Taiwanese Leftists who advocate for bringing in immigrants into Taiwan, who advocate for gay marriage, who advocate for basically trying to join the West and adopt Western so-called Western, basically like American libtard values.

 

And also each generation that is born in Taiwan, if you look at the polling, they consider themselves Taiwanese more and more and Chinese less and less.

 

So when they started doing polling on this back in the 1990s, the vast majority of the people of Taiwan when they asked them what’s your ethnicity? They said “I’m Chinese”. Now the vast majority of Taiwanese people in particularly young people say “we’re Taiwanese, I’m not Chinese”. And a minority identifies as Chinese.

 

So the Taiwanese have begun to see themselves as a distinct people. They identify with liberal, democratic, so-called western values. And yeah, they keep getting voted back in these Taiwanese libtards. And the Kuomintang who’s like, I guess the Taiwanese Right-wing conservative like Boomer Party, they say:

 

“Let’s not upset China. Like yes, like one day there is only one China and yes, one day we’ll reunify.”

 

But they tried to kind of maintain this perpetual status quo instead the Taiwanese libtards that are in power basically kind of pushing the envelope and getting more, not outright stating like full on Taiwanese independence, but basically almost saying that. And this is a big deal.

 

Like pretty much no country in the world recognises Taiwan as an independent state. Like technically on paper. America doesn’t, Australia doesn’t. Almost no one does because the Chinese have, in order to normalise relations with them, they insist that you have to, you can’t accept Taiwan is a legitimate state. They don’t have a seat at the UN. There are so they’re in a very interesting weird position.

 

And the leaders before Xi, when he took power were kind of conciliatory towards Taiwan. Like:

 

“Yes, as long as Taiwan accepts that there’s only one China and they don’t assert their independence, we’re chill with that. And one day we hope that we can peacefully reunify into like one political system.”

 

But they weren’t really pressing the issue. In the 1990s I believe there was a dispute under the Clinton administration era there was a dispute between China and Taiwan over like I think it was when the Taiwanese held their first Democratic election. I think that the Chinese didn’t appreciate that they preferred the Kuomintang to be in power because I guess they correctly assessed that the Kuomintang was going to be more pro-Beijing than what would come out of democracy, which is a more Westernised, anti-Chinese version of Taiwan. And anyway, strongly opposed the whole election procedure, I think it was in like 1996 or something.

 

And the way that Clinton responded as President of the United States was just to send some carrier strike groups through the Taiwanese straight and say:

 

“What are you going to do?”

 

Basically. At that time, China was so militarily weak compared to the United States that they just had to cuck out and just kind of watch the United States flex on them like that. The elections went ahead and Taiwan became a democracy.

 

Cycle forward to today and China’s way more powerful than it was back then they have invested a lot obviously in building up their navy, their air force, rocket tech, etc. They’re not at the level of the United States, but they’ve closed the gap in a very big way.

 

And after Covid, I remember 2022, I think I remember like Nancy Pelosi, she went to go and visit Taiwan and this caused a big stir because she was like Speaker of the House, so she was like third in line for the American leadership at the time, below the Vice President. And she flew to Taiwan to do a visit and she was the highest Ranking, I think US official to visit Taiwan in like 25 years since the events I just described, I think basically. And the Chinese freaked out and started doing all these military drills and shooting rockets over Taiwan and flying fighter jets all over Taiwan and practicing like invading Taiwan and stuff, doing like live drills with their navy and this kind of thing. Obviously with the intent of, basically freaking the Taiwanese out, saying “don’t take any steps towards independence, like you’re ours, bitch” kind of thing.

 

And Xi, in his public statements on Taiwan or official statements on Taiwan when he first came to power, there were a lot more tame. There was an assertion that Taiwan would be reunified with China.

 

But as time went on into the late 2010s and the 2020s, Xi statements have become more forceful, saying basically that option that we’d like to do it peacefully, but there’s other options on the table. If Taiwan makes a move towards independence, will invade, basically.

 

And anyway, this is a big deal because a war, an invasion of Taiwan isn’t just an invasion of Taiwan. The United States is basically committed to protecting Taiwan. And the reason why they’re committed to protecting Taiwan isn’t just to fuck with China or because they care about Taiwanese democracy, or something. It’s strategic.

 

Basically, if you look at the geography of East Asia, where Taiwan is very key strategic real estate. Because basically all the shipping lanes that connect Japan and South Korea through Southeast Asia, to the Middle East and to Europe all go past Taiwan. If China controls Taiwan, they’re able essentially to more effectively navally blockade Japan and Korea.

 

[38:31]

 

Now, that’s significant because Japan and Korea are highly dependent upon imports by sea. Korea only has a land border with one country, North Korea, which then is connected to Russia and China. So they need access to the sea to have access to the rest of the world, basically outside of Chinese control or North Korean control, which are probably even worse from their perspective.

 

Japan has no land borders with anyone. They have to trade by sea. And Japan doesn’t have natural resources in any substantial number. Japan is utterly dependent upon importing natural resources, even importing food. I believe. They don’t actually have enough agriculture to sustain their population. There’s like 120 million people on that island. They can’t feed them unless they can get ships in and out.

 

Basically, they’re highly dependent upon international trade. So if the Chinese were to navally blockade Japan or Korea, it could bring either of these states to their knees very quickly. They could cause famines. They could completely collapse their economies.

 

So if the United States doesn’t guarantee their security, basically they would be forced to cuck to China. They would be forced to sign a whole bunch of agreements subordinating themselves to China. And that would enable China to become a hegemon over East Asia. They’d have other political and military control over East Asia.

 

And that has massive ramifications, because that would mean Australia’s position becomes precarious. All the other countries in Southeast Asia becomes precarious. A lot of them, the Philippines, Vietnam, a lot of these states would be like a cascade effect. America would lose its ability to have bases. Right now, I think the Americans have like 50,000 personnel or something stationed in South Korea. They’ve still got bases there from the Korean War that they maintain. They’ve got obviously an alliance with Japan. Japan’s the most powerful country in East Asia that America is aligned with. If they lose Korea and Japan, their whole strategic position relative to China collapses.

 

And then all these other states, like I said, would then lose confidence in the United States to defend them. They would also then cuck to China. Maybe even Australia would cuck to China at that point, because there would be this cascade effect. China would become a regional hegemon. China would grow in global prestige. China would then be able to start projecting power beyond East Asia into the rest of the world. It would be a massive shift in global power dynamics.

 

So Taiwan is one little island of like 25 million people, right? It seems insignificant, but it’s not. Because from the Japanese and the Korean perspective, if America is not willing to defend Taiwan, they’re going to lose confidence that they’ll defend them and so on, right? The dominoes go from there.

 

So the United States has to project power in the region. It has to say:

 

“No, these are our regional partners. We will fight to defend them.”

 

Because that’s what holds together the network of alliances that keeps China kind of like locked in, where all the, these island countries and Southeast Asian countries that encircle China, whether it be the Philippines, Vietnam, you know, Indonesia even, and so on, Australia, this whole chain of countries, them all being aligned with the United States, locks China out, basically. They can’t build military bases on their territories. They can’t flex over them diplomatically, politically, and so on and force them to do whatever they want because they’re the big dog. Well, the United States and the Americas can do that they can flex on Canada, they can flex on Mexico, they can flex on all the countries around them because they’re just so much more dominant and powerful. Who’s going to come and defend Mexico against the United States? Who’s going to come and defend Canada against the United States? No one.

 

So America is able to throw its weight around. That’s how China would be able to kind of behave under these kinds of circumstances.

 

Basically, yeah, there’s a whole other series of technical advantages to Taiwan. China doesn’t have, like a deep drop into the Pacific Ocean. So there’s kind of like a, … The Pacific Ocean is very deep, right, like most big oceans are.

 

But as you get closer to China, the undersea kind of ground level, whatever you call that, it raises quite significantly. So when China drop a submarine off the coast of China, it can be detected, because of the [low] depth, by sensors.

 

However, if you drop a submarine off Taiwan, you get this radical kind of cliff drop basically on the eastern side of Taiwan straight into the Pacific Ocean. So in theory, Chinese nuclear subs could, if they control Taiwan, could be dropped off the east coast of Taiwan into the Pacific Ocean and be undetectable to the United States. Meaning the Chinese could sail nuclear subs all the way to the other side of the Pacific without the United States detecting them, because they could sail them at like maximum depth the whole way. That’s pretty serious because they got nuclear subs that would provide first strike capabilities or counter strike capabilities, or whatever, in the event of a nuclear exchange.

 

So there’s a lot of key, like strategic dynamics at play over who controls Taiwan.

 

Also, from the United States perspective, if China was to move on Taiwan, they would be upsetting the regional balance of power, like I said. It would give the Americans an excuse to go to war with China. Because now they’re saying:

 

“We’re just defending Taiwan, we’re defending our allies, right?”

 

And because China would anticipate that, they would probably actually attack Japan, Korea, other states at the same time they attack Taiwan, potentially under certain kind of like war game scenarios, it’s projected.

 

[45:50]

 

So the United States, the argument goes, maybe it’s in their interest to fight China now because if you leave it 100 years or 50 years China could keep developing, developing, developing, developing, and become so militarily powerful that they’re harder to beat 50 years down the track than they are now.

 

So the idea is you kind of bitch slap them now, put them back in their place, because a war with China over Taiwan is far preferable to a war with China somewhere closer to the United States, or a war with China after they’ve already got Japan and Korea and these other states on their side and consolidated power and have grown stronger. And now maybe they’re getting involved in South American politics or they’re getting involved in European politics or Middle Eastern politics or something, and you’re fighting China in another part of the world.

 

The advantage for the Americans of fighting them over Taiwan is that it’s right in China. Basically, it’s right off the coast of China. America can send all their navy, air force, whatever, and just blow up as much in China as they possibly can.

 

And at the same time, they can navally blockade China in Southeast Asia. China is also utterly dependent on international shipping that goes through Southeast Asia to connect it to the Middle East and to Europe. China doesn’t have enough natural resources, resources to sustain itself. It doesn’t even have enough food to sustain itself. It needs to import a lot of stuff. Also, its economy is entirely built around exports.

 

So the US strategy, they don’t necessarily even have to defend the island of Taiwan successfully. They can just blow up a bunch of shit in China, try and blow up as much of China’s military hardware as possible, and then set up a blockade in Southeast Asia that stops China from basically being connected to the rest of the world through shipping, and then wait and watch as China internally kind of destabilises. And win the war that way. That would probably be their strategy.

 

So, however, if you allow China to kind of develop and all these Southeast Asian countries to become allies of China because you didn’t fight them over Taiwan, setting up that naval blockade becomes way more difficult because maybe all those states are now Chinese allies and they’re going to be enemies of the United States. They’re going to allow the Chinese to build naval installations. They’re not going to allow the Americans to bring their navy into their region or whatever.

 

So, yeah, international politics is a confidence game. If all these states have confidence in American power, they’ll back it. If they’ll cuck to China. That’s how it works. So Taiwan is just like this first domino in this chain effect of strategic ramifications.

 

Now, this is significant because ultimately the ball is in China’s court. The United States can’t force China to invade Taiwan. Maybe they could try and convince the Taiwanese to do something suicidal, like declare independence or something and really provoke it, but they can’t ultimately decide what China does. China decides what China does.

 

Now, Xi Jinping, in his kind of aggressive foreign policy, has only really been kind of pushing Taiwan away, making Taiwan fear invasion seem inevitable, getting the Americans to basically see invasion as potentially on the horizon, prepare for a war with China. Trump’s foreign policy is a large aspect of it is really geared towards containing China, like the tariff policies and so on. There’s people in the Trump administration, like Elbridge Colby, I think his name is, and others who are national security advisors who are just like China hawks, who just say that basically everything should be focused on containing China. Fuck Russia, fuck the Middle East, we should just make peace deals and forget about it and just take all of our military hardware, concentrate it in East Asia and get ready to fight China or try and deter China from going to war with us. So that School of thought is developing in the United States because of Xi’s actions.

 

And basically, the longer that the current trajectory of things, or Xi’s basically kind of led trajectory of things continues, the closer and closer World War III gets, basically. So that’s like the strategic context.

 

Meanwhile, Xi had spent years concentrating power, purging rival factions, stuffing the party full of his allies.

 

But then in the last year, you’re seeing a kind of a bit of like a backflip. A lot of his allies getting purged, his public appearances like I said earlier, being curtailed. The tone in the media, he’s getting criticised. Not openly directly criticised but getting indirectly criticised by a lot of people and then other rivals, other old heads basically in the Chinese Communist Party not directly criticising his Taiwan policy but advocating for a far more restrained Taiwan policy in their public statements, including this Zhang Yuga guy who is the 2IC [Second in Charge] over military affairs. Basically the guy running the Chinese military who’s presiding over a lot of these purges that happening to these Xi’s top guys, who basically is the highest Ranking dude in the Chinese military structure.

 

So it’s interesting because what it seems like is that however internal dynamics have been seized its hard to tell from the outside. It seems like there’s been a move against Xi. Not necessarily that he’s going to get replaced as leader although there’s some speculation that he could be literally about to be replaced. That would be very uncharacteristic. Usually they don’t. Someone’s elected to do a five year term that would mean Xi’s term doesn’t end till 2027 that it would continue. But he’s being sidelined. There was an announcement a few days ago that a so-called joint decision making body was being created at the top of the CCP and Xi Jinping, you know, has really kind of pushed for a long time. He is the leader. His interpretation of policy is the prevailing interpretation and China will be strong if basically it subordinates itself to him and his leadership. And that’s the way a lot of the top officials in the Communist Party were talking for years. Now the tone has shifted. Now they’re talking about power sharing and committees of decision makers and how everyone in the party needs to be included like the party leadership in decision making. We need to create more committees and have more what they call Democratic Centralism which basically means there’s one central decision making body but within that body you have democracy. So the Chinese people don’t have democracy but the party leadership collaboratively make decisions.

 

[51:56]

 

So they’re trying to cuck Xi, strip him of his kind of authoritarian power and kind of subordinate him to the other elements within the party. There is a rise in prominence of the so-called party elders who represent this more liberal view that I was describing earlier.

 

And the backdrop of this is also that the Chinese economy is slowing. So my view, Ron Unz put this view forward with some compelling evidence. I remember a few years ago, and I think it makes sense, is that Covid was probably a bioweapon created by an element of the United States government. I don’t know which element, whether it was a rogue element or it was directly under Trump himself ordered it to be done or what, we don’t know, I don’t know exactly. But some element within the US Government unleashed that bioweapon on China.

 

And I think it also had a secondary purpose of facilitating all these economic policy or financial policy actions where basically in the United States the economy was hurtling towards really difficult times. Covid happens they just then flood the market with all of this money to prop it up by basically bailing out all the major companies, all the major banks, basically massive wealth transfer, just giving trillions and trillions of dollars to the American financial elite. That’s basically what they did during Covid.

 

And no one was in the streets protesting it like they were after the global financial crisis because everyone was arguing about vaccine mandates and vaccines and lockdowns and blah, blah, blah, Covid shit! Because everyone was arguing about Covid bullshit, no one was arguing about:

 

“What the fuck! The richest people in the world just stole $15 trillion off us. What are we going to do about it?”

 

Well, no one did anything.

 

And I think that was basically like the psyop. Like they, it was like a sleight of hand. Like we can’t just do another 2008 style bank bailout. So fabricate this bullshit crisis that gets all the goys into this false paradigm, and we’ll have them argue within that space for a year and a half and then once we’ve transferred $15 trillion to the financial elite, we’ll just close the paradigm and then we’ll just pretend like everything’s gone back to normal. Which is what happened! That’s literally what happened!

 

There was no permanent vaccine passports or what. Remember everyone was saying:

 

“If you don’t get the vaccine, you’re going to get put in a camp and vaccines are going to kill everyone!”

 

And all this kind of stuff.

 

And obviously the vaccines were fucked up! I’m very glad I didn’t get one. And who knows what the long term effects of those things are going to be. It’s kind of scary to think about. But I think a lot of the catastrophe, the kind of catastrophism that many people had, has been shown to be false because everyone hasn’t dropped dead. There’s some evidence that it’s had an impact on fertility. I saw a study recently that about a third. It’s got like a 33% drop basically in the fertility of women who got the vax versus the ones who didn’t. Something like that, which is significant.

 

But I don’t know. I didn’t read the study closely enough to know if it was controlled for the fact that a lot of the women who didn’t get the vax are also quite conservative. So wouldn’t they be more like as a demographic, be more likely to have more children? Because you know, when I think about the kind of women I know they didn’t get the vax. Usually they’re very Right-wing, very conservative, very traditional. A lot of Christians didn’t get the vaccine because they thought it had something to do with the mark of the Beast and the book of Revelation. People who are into conspiracy theories, people who are in the dissident Right who listen to Right-wing memes. We’re the kind of demographic that didn’t get the vax, the non-conformist types. Well, we’re also probably a demographic that are more likely to have kids at higher rates because we kind of reject the mainstream programming, eat healthier, have more traditional values and so on.

 

So I don’t know if that’s all it is. Just like the vax was predominantly taken by people that are libtards and normies and they just got a lower birth rate than Right-wingers, or if there’s something actually in the vax that’s causing the fertility issue. But whatever the case may be, the consequences don’t seem to have been as catastrophic as what people were saying.

 

So while they had you arguing about that, this is what they were doing.

 

[56:35]

 

But I also think part of why they released Covid specifically in Wuhan in China is in order to basically try and slow down the Chinese economy. Because prior to Covid, the Chinese economy was growing at breakneck speed. It was growing like two or three times as fast as the United States economy and had been for decades. So China’s flying and they’re building up their military power. Xi is in power. He is the strongest leader since Mao, most consolidated authoritarian leader since Mao. Militaristic, nationalistic, getting more and more aggressive on Taiwan, more and more assertive in the world.

 

Something needed to be done to slow this mother fucker down! Boom! Covid! Drop Covid in China. What happens to Asians when they think that there’s a disease happening? They freak the fuck out! I remember like it was all the Chinese that bought all the toilet paper and stuff when Covid broke out and you couldn’t get toilet paper for months, it was a nightmare because Asians are hyper anxious people and Asians would always wear masks whenever they get sick, even before Covid. That’s part of their culture because Asians are bug people who live in giant cities full of millions of people. Disease spreads very easily in Asian societies and so they’ve culturally adapted to be more threat avoidant and neurotic about diseases than White people because we don’t live in the same kind of environments on average.

 

So it’s also why conservatives and people who live in the countryside were less freaked out than inner city like libtard cosmopolitans because they’re more like Asians. They live in these kind of more clustered environments where they have contact with more humans per day and so they’re more neurotic and so on about these things.

 

But anyway, the point is that you drop a disease like that in China, it’s going to shut down the economy. And it did that very effectively. China’s economy still hasn’t recovered from Covid, like their official figures still look kind of decent, but if you really scratch beneath the surface and you look at the underlying numbers, the Chinese economy hasn’t recovered from Covid. It’s actually slowed down to about the pace of the United States economy in terms of its growth. And yeah, there’s a lot of structural problems with the Chinese economy. Like you can see they’re claiming publicly that the economy is growing at 5% and everything’s fine. But youth unemployment is high. And look at the underlying numbers.

 

Like if you look at prices, house prices, industrial goods prices and so on, these prices are stagnating or falling, which indicates a lack of demand. So it means people don’t have money, businesses don’t have money, people don’t have money to buy houses, to invest in expanding business operations, whatever.

 

So that shows that there’s some structural problems inside the economy. You know, in China, it’s hard to trust any statistics that come out of China because there’s all these incentives to lie because they, everything’s managed by central committees and those central committees are assessed based upon these metrics. So of course they’re going to lie about the metrics to make themselves look better. And everything in Chinese, you know, culture is about saving face and not appearing weak, not appearing incompetent or whatever.

 

So I think it’s quite clear the Chinese economy has slowed down. Covid was very effective in doing that. It slowed down international trade, which China’s dependent upon. It also just literally caused all these lockdowns all through China that went on for ages. That this like zero Covid policy that persisted for a long, very long time. Their lockdowns went on longer than any other country. They were still doing lockdowns I think in 2022, when everyone else was open and back to normal. So that really fucked them up. And there’s a lot of evidence that the Americans released it.

 

Like for example, the so-called Wuhan lab where this thing was built was literally funded by Bill Gates, right? He’s a fucking American! And Anthony Fauci was like working there. Like, what’s going on?

 

Also they had the World Military games in Wuhan at the same time that Covid was broke out or was released or whatever. We know that it was a genetically engineered disease. Okay, that’s kind of quite something like the World Military Games. So like US military people were there was like 600 guys or 800 guys from the US military in Wuhan at the time when it was released.

 

So the US had people there that could have released it. And you know, there’s a lot of links to people that have links to the ruling class in America. So you know, why would, if the Chinese created a bioweapon, why would they release it in their own country? Wouldn’t you release it in someone else’s country? Like who releases bioweapons in their own country? Like that’s insane!

 

Also there were suppressed reports at the same time that it was released in Wuhan that Covid spontaneously was also released in Iran and in Russia, but it was never reported on in Western media. They just only focused on the Chinese release. That’s kind of interesting. Like the other two, like major American geopolitical enemies or whatever.

 

So yeah, I think that there was something nefarious that went on there. I think it was intentional. It’s beyond a shadow of a doubt that Covid was biologically engineered. Like that’s just confirmed at this point.

 

So the question is, who released it? Would China release a bioweapon in their own country that ended up fucking up their own economy? Or would America do it? Not only did it fuck up the Chinese economy, it greatly benefited the American ruling class.

 

So think about it. Why would China do that?

 

[1:02:34]

 

But anyway, my point is that all of these dynamics are occurring. You could see why elements within Chinese Communist Party would move against Xi because the economy is stagnating. Xi is a hardliner. Xi wants to isolate the Chinese economy from the rest of the world. Doesn’t want American cultural influence, doesn’t want foreign financial interests coming into China, gaining a foothold in the Chinese economy. Doesn’t want Chinese elites developing too close relationships with people in the West, with Western elites, and becoming disloyal to China. Right. He’s a nationalist, and that’s why he has those views. It makes sense.

 

The elements within China that support liberalisation, that want to have a better relationship with the United States, that don’t want to kind of rock the boat, have a war over, potential World War over Taiwan that could destabilise China irrevocably, potentially. They lose a war like that. Like, it could be over for the Communist Party in China who are right now, you know, elites that are doing well, that are rich, successful, whatever, have good positions in Chinese society. Do they want to go to war with America over Taiwan? Do they feel as passionate as Xi does about these nationalist policies? No! A lot of them don’t. And they make public statements that show that they don’t. So if Xi got sick, showed weakness or this weakness that he has at the moment because the economy isn’t doing so well and so on, maybe they’ve chosen this as the time to move because Xi had consolidated so much power, and that’s why we’re seeing this switch up within Chinese politics.

 

But a lot of this is speculative and kind of reading between the lines on a lot of things that people are saying in China. It will become clearer in the coming weeks and months. I think the next plenary session, the fourth plenary session in China is occurring on, like, August. That’s going to be key, seeing how that plays out, you know how Xi behaves, public statements made by other leading figures and so on, that’ll say a lot about whether Xi has been sidelined or at the very least, radically cucked in how much power he has over the Chinese Communist Party and how much other elements of the party are resurging in power and influence.

 

And based upon that, it’ll completely reset the clock on the World War III clock. Is World War III going to happen? Is a war between America and China going to happen this decade? If Xi manages to hold and reconsolidate power and this is all bullshit! Or he can turn it around? Potentially, yes. This could embolden him to go:

 

“Okay, well, I almost got defeated. Now’s the chance for the power and glory. Defeat the United States. The Chinese century beckons. I’m a great man of history!”

 

Invades Taiwan. Boom! World War III! Or Xi can’t come back from this. He’s been defeated. He’s been internally outpositioned. All these top guys are taken out. He’s basically been undermined, and it’s basically over for the Xi era. If that happens, there’s not going to be a war with Taiwan anytime soon.

 

And obviously, the big Trump tariffs that were dumped on China only exacerbated these problems, and they’ll probably go down as a strategic masterstroke, which future generations look back at this. The key is, as well, there was a recent negotiation between the Americans and the Chinese. I think it was in London or something, over a trade agreement between the United States and China, an agreement to bring down their mutual tariffs on one another and so on. What’s kind of interesting about that, Xi said nothing about it. Zero! Wasn’t involved, hasn’t made one public statement about it. It’s a pretty big fucking deal, you would think.

 

But not only has Xi not said anything about it, nobody in the Chinese government has really stated any substance at all about what was negotiated. But Trump walks away from that negotiation immediately. He is saying:

 

“I’ve secured an incredible deal and we’re going to open China up. And it’s an incredible deal with massive progress and my negotiating team, they’re the best in the world!”

 

Why was Trump so happy and why is China not saying anything? Very suspicious.

 

Some people are suspecting that it’s because basically the faction that Trump negotiated with, it’s not Xi’s faction, it’s the faction undermining Xi. And basically, until they can fully cuck go formally or get him to step down while saving face or something, they’re not going to announce the deal. So what’s in that deal? When that deal gets made public again, that’s going to be a key indication of where China is at. Because there’s no way that Xi, based upon his philosophy, his ideology, would be willing to make any concessions to the United States. You know, he’s a staunch nationalist. Whereas, yeah, other elements in the CCP absolutely would, in order to preserve economic stability, because the Chinese economy is not doing great! And their view is that the way that they gain the support of the Chinese people predominantly is through managing the economy well. They don’t have a democracy, they don’t get voted in, but they say:

 

“Qu hey, look, you don’t get to vote in your leaders. But look at the great job that we’re doing. You know, China’s constantly developing. Everyone’s getting richer, everyone’s getting more opportunities, everyone’s making more money. So don’t rock the boat. Just trust the plan!”

 

Right? And that obviously has worked for a certain period of time, but what happens when it stops working? I don’t think a lot of people in the higher ups in the CCP want to find out what happens, and I think a lot of them don’t want to go to war with the United States. I think they’re afraid, and understandably so, because they could get absolutely blasted! Like, even if they were to win, they would take a lot of damage, and it could basically set back the whole project forever. It could destabilise the Chinese Communist Party’s grip on power entirely.

 

I mean, what if the United States there’s certain dams in southern China that some analysts say if you bomb them, it could cause a flood that could kill hundreds of millions of people! If you do a naval blockade on China, it could cause a famine that could kill hundreds of millions of people! Like, the United States is over 7,000 nuclear weapons like the do you really want to have World War III against the power that’s that powerful? And when you’re that vulnerable? A lot of them probably might view Xi as a madman! And the Chinese are not risk takers. They’re not a nation of Hitlers. They’re not a nation of blitzkriegers. They’re not a nation of poker players. You know, they’re a mercantile race of Art of War, you know, Wu Wei, do nothing, win. That’s kind of like the Chinese, you know, philosophy and mentality is being conservative, being harmonious relations and all this gay shit! They don’t have the Faustian spirit.

 

[1:10:09]

 

So basically what I’m saying is that we’re probably at the on the brink here of total chudjack victory. If Xi loses his grip on power, World War 3 will not happen anytime soon. So that radically kind of changes the calculations. And that actually also, I think, explains why Israel might have decided to kick things off with Iran. The Israelis, they might have gained intelligence that China is weak. And they think:

 

“Well, if we try and escalate things with Iran now, the Americans might have more confidence that the Chinese won’t do shit over Taiwan. And so we can start forcing the issue on Iran.”

 

Basically that’s why they chose to move now, partly maybe because Trump is in power, but also partly because, yeah, maybe the China threat isn’t as imminent as as many previously thought, if Xi’s power is weakened.

 

So anyway, big dynamics, I think, like very complicated, lots of moving parts. But yeah, nothing ever happens. Nothing ever fucking happens! Yeah. Relying on China to move world history, I guess, was a mistake. I mean, think about the kind of people we’re dealing with here.

 

So anyway, I think that’s interesting and important to report because from an Australian nationalist perspective, World War III, if it was to happen, would completely change everything. So we kind of have to have our finger on the pulse of like how, like, are we at Defcon4 or like, where are we at on the, is World War III gonna happen rating scale? Because that’s a massive spanner in the works.

 

I’ll go through a few Superchats. I see Ultra Saxon said:

 

“I’d love to see you guys do a stream with Karl Radl from X. Every post of him is a gem and he’s super informative on National Socialism. Respect from England, lads.”

 

Yeah, Karl, I’ve seen his stuff. I would like to do. I think he’s more of like a Twitter guy. I don’t think he does video streams. I never seen him do a video stream before. Maybe I’m wrong, like, correct me if I’m wrong. But yeah, maybe like a Twitter space or something like it would be interesting too. I think I actually proposed that to him and then I got banned from Twitter. But make an alt account and have a conversation. If he was interested, I’d be down to discuss. Seems like his wheelhouse is World War II history and NS German history. That’s obviously quite interesting. Dan3 said:

 

“There are apparently experts saying that China has less than half their official population using salt consumption and other stats to estimate their population. Don’t know this is whether this is propaganda though.”

 

Oh, you’re saying that there’s some estimates that their population is much smaller than they say?

 

Yeah, I mean, I don’t know about that. I don’t think they’d be able to like lie about something that effectively. But you definitely can’t trust the stats you hear out of China. Megawatts 80 said:

 

“Everyone watching should send a few bucks. Hail victory!”

 

Well, I can’t disagree with that. Sector88 said:

 

“Any opinion on the Yanks reviewing the AUKUS agreement? I don’t believe we’ll be getting the Virginia subs until the late 2000s at best. No matter the a administration, unless they somehow double or triple sub production.”

 

Yeah, it, there does seem to be a great lag on that.

 

But I don’t see them ripping up the AUKUS agreement because at the end of the day it’s in the strategic interest of the Americans for us to have better subs. You know, the current subs that the Australian military has basically not going to last much longer. The old subs, they’re going to be decommissioned. We need to have new subs somehow and we don’t have a programme in place to build our own. The Americans aren’t going to want us to have no subs.

 

Also, we’re paying big money for their subs, so of course they’d like to sell them to us. And the nuclear capable subs are important just purely for the fact that, well, you don’t have to refuel. The nuclear reactor lasts like 30 years or whatever. So that’s an incredible capability where you can effectively just stay at the bottom of the ocean as long as you want. Incredible technology. So from a strategic standpoint it’s vital if we want to assist the Americans in engaging in like a naval blockade against China to have that kind of thing. There’s a reason why the Chinese freak out about AUKUS and they don’t want us having nuclear subs is because nuclear subs are effective as fuck! Like they’re incredible technology, and not that many countries have them. Ultra Saxon said:

 

“Joel, have you ever heard of the concept of a Canzak union? You see the idea amongst normie Libs, but I see it being a great long term geostrategic strategy for reuniting and re empowering the Anglo sphere.”

 

Yeah, I mean in principle I don’t necessarily think it would be so bad, but there’s a few things why I don’t think it’s realistic.

 

[1:15:44]

 

Number one, Canada is basically the strategic bitch of the United States. So being able to deal with Canada as an independent state is unlikely. Also Australia’s main allies, the United States and Britain’s main allies, the United States.

 

So this idea that we could all come together and form a union that was somehow not integrated with the United States is unlikely to be something that the United States would be too happy about. So it would only really happen if there was a massive sea change in the respective politics of our three countries. It’s unlikely that that sea change is going to be the same in all three.

 

So let’s say like nationalists, let’s say like we win in Australia. Is libtard Britain or libtard Canada going to want to make some kind of alliance with us? Probably not. And vice versa. So I don’t see it as super likely.

 

Also, there’s radically different. Like, there isn’t a lot of economic trade between the Anglo-sphere countries. Like Australia trades a lot with them. Like all three trade a lot with America. We don’t trade much with each other. Like the Canadian economy is very similar to Australia’s in the sense it has a lot of minerals and so on. We both need to trade with like manufacturing powers to like, get the most out of our economy. So like, economic integration doesn’t make as much sense as it does in say, Europe.

 

Also, we’re geographically quite isolated from one another in different regions of the world.

 

So I think, yeah, the argument is, oh, but we’ve got similar culture, similar forms of government, good relations, similar heritage. Yeah, okay, like, but why does that mean? Like, what would the union be? Just like a union where like, we’re already in a military alliance with one another, basically. Like Canada and Britain are both in NATO. Australia’s not in NATO, but we’re like a NATO partner or whatever. So like, what would it really do? Like freedom of movement? Again, like say, like we take power in Australia as nationalists. Do we want to have freedom of movement with Britain and Canada? No, because then they’re going to like flood Australia with nons. I’d rather just have an immigration policy that takes White people from those countries. So yeah I don’t really see what like the point of Canzuk Union is like from a strategic standpoint. So I don’t really see it happening.

 

But like, let’s say we took power in Australia, we would look to take over New Zealand. As well, that’s undoubtedly true. And then we would probably look to support nationalist forces in Britain as best we could. And then if we that was successful, then we’d form an alliance on those terms. Be very different than the Canzuk Union.

 

Then, like, let’s say, like our guys are running Australia and Britain and there was this idea of getting the empire back together and building an imperial federation that fuses the two countries. We could look into it down the track.

 

But yeah, it would be difficult probably because at that point, like the Australian identity, the British identity had diverged so much at that point. We’re on opposite sides of the planet, completely different strategic objectives. Like is Britain going to want to fight to the death to defend Australia’s geopolitical interests and vice versa? You know, maybe they are, maybe they aren’t. But that’s usually you get those kinds of alliances between countries that border each other. Dan3 also said. Oh no, I already read that.

 

Modern World Reject, he just hailed! Awesome! Hail you. Modern world reject said:

 

“How World War III affect nationalist politics in Australia?”

 

Well, if it was to happen, massively! Number one, the regime here would have to completely change its attitude on racism. You know, they would basically have to allow anti-Chinese racism in society because they would have to find a rationale basically to either mass incarcerate or mass deport almost, 2 million Chinese people that live in Australia. There’s about one Chinese person for every 10 White people in Australia. Like that’s how you gonna go to war with China and just allow them to walk around and be, hold high ranking positions in society and trust them like it’s not feasible. Also if you want to fight a war you need patriotism.

 

So you’re gonna have to wind back the woke shit, allow people to be kind of racist. If you’re going to want to try and convince young White Australian men to fight a World War, you can’t keep flooding their country with foreigners. You can’t keep pushing the current like ridiculously woke anti-White agenda down their throats. They won’t fight for you! They won’t sign up. So there would have to be a completely new deal made. Like the government would have to make a lot of concessions to us.

 

And I think after the war everything would be radically different. I think after a war like that, it would become defining in world history, in Australian history. The memory of World War II would fade and the whole paradigm of the post World War II international order would collapse. And it’d be a Great Reset basically. Not in the kind of Claus Schwabian sense, but it’d be like a full reset basically of ideologically, historically and so on.

 

[1:21:40]

 

And ultimately if Australia came out of it intact, I think it’d be good for nationalism. I think nationalism would grow in a post World War III Australia much more quickly and more forcefully than you know, in the current order. It’d be a great shake up, a great reality check.

 

Megawatt said:

 

“Touch on the SA political donation laws. Will this go national?”

 

I have to read up on it first. Not too aware of South Australia’s political donation laws. Rygo Weber said:

 

“Joel, will you or Blair be running as Senators in the next election? I think you would be quite effective. Thanks for the show.”

 

Yeah, we’re looking at doing something like that. Obviously we’ve got to launch the party. It’s a long time to the next federal election. You got to decide what we want to do with the state elections that happened before then. So exactly how it all fits together is a bit open ended because there’s a long way between now and then. There’s a lot to consider. Yeah, we’re gonna have a crack.

 

What else we got here. On Entropy Racist Aristocrats, he said, this is directed at Blair after last week:

 

“Blair, when Joel violates liberal norms, for example, equating the desire for a White man to marry an African with marrying a dog. Why the knee jerk reaction to sheepishly moderated. Who are you hoping to placate? Seems rather inexplicably explicably discordant.”

 

Okay, well that’s kind of funny. Says here:

 

“Joel, Cameron McGregor has a worthwhile fourth turning influence. Take positing America and Australia, by inference remains in the adolescent stage of development. He’s a coming war of reintegration of the state and national White Identity driven polarisation, catalyzing White unification and ending pluralism and disintegration. He sees Whites awakening to race, the jewish question and distrust of modern capitalism as preconditions for state transition to adulthood. You two could have a fruitful chat.”

 

Well, I don’t know who that is, but sounds good. So if he’s out there, he wants to get in touch. By all means, yeah.

 

I will say another couple things, another couple things that have been on my mind this week that are interesting to observe. So whilst you’re seeing these big kind of moves in China, behind the scenes shifting of power in America, you’re also seeing an interesting dynamic emerge where I remember when Musk and Trump had a falling out, they then kind of patched things up and I said I don’t see this lasting. Well, I think I was correct about that. Musk has been very vocal over the past week in his opposition to the so-called Big Beautiful Bill. And there’s reports that he’s going to fund Thomas Massie, who is the Israel critical Republican, the only Republican that’s not taking money from AIPAC or whatever. He’s going to fund his primary campaign because Trump is backing his opponent because Trump hates Massey because Massey’s basically not going along with the Zionist agenda.

 

So that’s interesting to see that Musk is going to step in and take Massey’s side and drive this kind of wedge between using the Israel issue to drive a wedge within the Republican Party.

 

Because as I said, Musk’s position is awkward in American politics because he’s completely abandoned the Left. The Left hate him! The Left maybe hate him more than Trump because he’s said and done maybe things that are more radical than what even Trump has done. Well, just objectively are like he’s throwing Romans and kind of statements that he’s made. But also he didn’t successfully win over Republicans. Musk is awkward, he’s a nerd. He’s not even American. And he’s kind of like a [word unclear] to Trump’s movement. Trump has organic charisma. He’s a real American. He’s beloved by the people and he’s the president.

 

So the average, you know, red blooded, Right-wing American sides with Trump against Musk. And also Trump doesn’t see himself as beholden to Musk. He sees Musk is below him in the hierarchy. Doesn’t matter how many hundreds of millions Musk kind of threw at him. Musk wasn’t able to get what he wanted out of Trump. He wasn’t able to get what he wanted out of MAGA, if you will.

 

And so now Musk is in political no man’s land. He’s the richest man in America on paper. He is entirely dependent his business models basically on American government subsidies. So he needs political power on his side. But he’s alienated both major sides of politics. So what do you do in a situation like that? Well, if you’re the world’s, world’s richest man on paper, you’re probably going to try and fund a third faction into existence. And that’s what you see his early moves.

 

So I could see Musk making bigger moves going ahead and it could be a real kind of I don’t like Musk in the sense that he, any kind of like pro-White stuff that he said to try and like win us over, he kind of like showed his true colours on the H1B Indian saga where he sided with stuffing America full of Indian H1B Visa types as opposed to preserving the White majority.

 

So that shows where he stands slike he’s not truly loyal to us or our concerns.

 

But nevertheless, when you see inter elite competition, it’s a good thing. It means that there’s dynamism in politics. It means it opens up opportunities for dissidents because you’re probably going to get more free speech, more open exchange of ideas, more dynamism in politics if you have two rival factions on the Right competing for the approval of the Right-wing masses. And what Musk showed through that whole H1B Visa saga is that he does care about maintaining a positive public image and that he has political ambitions.

 

[1:28:31]

 

So it could be a real challenger to like the Peter Thiel Donald Trump network. J.D. Vance, you know, is the heir apparent to Trump as president. If Musk can find a candidate that’s capable of taking on Vance, Vance is going to have a real challenger with hundreds of millions behind him. And I said before, if Tucker Carlson wanted to run for president against J.D. Vance, for example. I think Elon Musk would give him hundreds of millions of dollars and I think he’d beat J.D. Vance.

 

So that’s a situation to monitor as well. Big dynamics in America and China, like deep politics, elite politics that could really define what direction the wind is going to flow, going to blow over the next few years and kind of define the next decade or generation in international politics.

 

So that’s something that I noticed as well, something to keep an eye on. But an issue that I wanted to discuss as well, to kind of end the show, I guess, is I’ve got a Superchat coming. I’ll read a couple of these and then I’ll discuss this. Rabbi Shlomo Noisberg said:

 

“A hundred dollars. What do you need $90 for? I’m not going to give you an $80 Superchat to a racist, anti-semite. That $70 is mine. All right, fine, I’ll give you $60. But this is not a gift, it’s a loan and I want interest.”

 

Well, you’re not getting interest. I don’t even know who the hell you are. Dad3 said:

 

“Do you think the English will have a great man like Hitler and Napoleon in a few decades after the Civil War? Maybe three original Germanic great powers are supposed to have one after a disaster!”

 

I want to know what kind of question that is.

 

Yeah, I think that’s all the Superchats, but yeah, like one thing I want to discuss is the issue of settler colonialism. There’s been a lot of discussion precipitated, I think, by anti-Israel discourse. There’s been a lot of discussion on the Right. The dissonant Right. About the issue of settler colonialism. And there’s basically two major schools of thought. One is we should oppose ourselves to the idea of settler colonialism and talk about jewish supremacy and talk about how Israel is this horrible evil colonial power who’s stealing away land from the Palestinians. And this will help us educate White people on the jews and show that the jews are the bad guys, not Whites, and that Whites don’t want to hurt anyone. And we just want to have our own countries too. And yeah, and we can kind of focus all of the ire that’s directed against imperialism and colonialism and so on against jews and that this would be in our interest.

 

And sometimes these people say if you don’t agree with this, you must be jewish or Joel is a secret Zionist because he doesn’t agree with us.

 

The other position, my position, is that we should oppose Israel on the basis that Israel is a parasitical and subversive force of zionism, let’s say in general, because it’s not just the state of Israel, it’s also the jewish diasporas that live in our countries. They’re a subversive and parasitical force on our countries, White countries, Australia, America and particular Britain, so on. They’ve completely taken over the Right-wing. They have incredible power over the media and they use their power and influence to siphon off resources and support for Israel even though Australia and America and Britain have no strategic interest whatsoever in Israel. Like actually. They’ve captured politicians in America through incredibly nefarious means, like where they’re running paedophile networks and shit like that! They have [word unclear] like British monarchs and you know, elites from across society. Who knows how deep that goes. This is why we should oppose Israel. They’ve dragged us into wars we had no business fighting for no strategic benefit to ourselves. They taken over the Right-wing and redirect the Right-wing towards, in our countries towards their interests as opposed to representing the interests of our actual nation and people. This is what we should be criticising them for what they’re doing to us!

 

Like in Australia recently, you know, we’ve been going, doing a lot of activism and discussing a lot about the involvement of the organised jewish community and probably the Mossad in leveraging false flag, so-called anti-semitic attacks to push through an agenda to attack our free speech, to make it illegal for us to criticise jews in Israel and other racial groups as well.

 

That’s why we should be criticising jews. We should be explaining to the people of White Australians, White Americans and so on what jews are doing to them and why jews are their enemy. I think going on about like bleeding hearts about the poor Palestinians and this kind of shit is the wrong trajectory because it plays into the same moral framework that is used to describe how the poor Aboriginals and the horrors of colonialism, White colonialism or you know, the poor African slaves in America or etc. Etc, etc. It’s the same morality and framing that is used as a stick to beat the White man. And it’s generally appeals to Leftists who are anti-White, who hate the British Empire, who hate the White Australia Policy, who hate the racist founding of America, blah blah, blah blah, who hate us and everything that we stand for.

 

So to me that’s insane! The argument they make is:

 

“Well if you try and if you try and defend settler colonialism, if you say oh well, Australia was built on settler colonialism, then you’re just being the bad guy.”

Apparently you’re being the bad guy. You’re playing into the narrative of the enemy. Apparently this is what these people say. And no one’s going to support your White nationalist movement. What you have to do is say:

 

“You know what, I agree with the Left, Aboriginals were treated horribly and we don’t deserve to have this country because we’re horrible colonial occupiers!”

 

[1:35:31]

 

And somehow acknowledging all of that is going to help us to advance White nationalism. Like it doesn’t make any sense to me. It’s very simple. This country was built on settler colonialism. This country was built on our people coming here, conquering it, taking it off the people who were previously here, asserting our dominance over it, securing it for our people, fighting for it, defending it, building it up into what it is.

 

And that’s how shit works, that’s how nature works. We live in a dog-eat-dog world. Everything anyone has in this world was taken off someone else at some point. There’s a finite amount of resources on this planet. There’s not enough to go around. Some people win, some people lose. I want to win, I don’t want to lose. And when you assert your interest in this world, someone loses out. There’s never a way to be a totally nice guy and for everyone to get everything that they want. It just doesn’t work like that. That’s not how God made Earth, the universe. If you don’t like that, take it up with God. But that’s how it is, that’s reality.

 

And this idea that we need to be like 20th century liberals, we can’t assert the morality of any of our ancestors before 20th century, post World War II liberalism. We can’t say the British Empire was glorious! We can’t say the colonisation of Australia was glorious! That we can’t assert the interests of White people and White Australians just because we are White and because no one’s going to look after us but ourselves. It’s ridiculous!

 

That’s a message that makes complete sense. I believe in it. And I don’t think White people are going to be able to do what is necessary to take back control of our countries unless they’re willing to accept a message like that. I don’t think this so-called normie demographic that exists out there that is willing to be White nationalists only so long as White nationalists chungus pilled and respect everyone and don’t want to assert their superiority of everyone and want to like eke out space for everyone’s human rights and treat everyone amazingly and love everybody. I don’t think these people really exist. I think people who need to be placated to like that actually are against us and won’t embrace our politics no matter how chungus, no matter how moral fagged we make it.

 

And I also believe that the average person is capable of understanding that we live in a world of struggle. That life is struggle. That you got to fight for it, you got to fight for your existence on this planet. And that either we’re going to fight for our collective existence as a people or it’s going to be taken from us and that those are the two options on the table. We need a reality check! We need to come come to reality on this question. We can’t live in this illusion that if we just frame things with the Right moral arguments and make the right amount of concessions that we can somehow negotiate a perfectly nice and non-violent and non-controversial way for us to continue existing on this planet and to continue having our own countries. It’s the mentality of a fucking cuck. It’s the mentality of a loser.

 

We have strength as a race. Incredible collective strength! If we come together and assert our interests together. If we’re willing to come together and fight for our existence, we can secure it. That’s what it comes down to.

 

And I’m not going to forsake the incredible actions of my ancestors. I’m going to venerate them. What they did to create this country. Stealing countries of other peoples is something that few peoples are actually capable of I don’t consider it to be an immoral thing, I think you either fight for it or you don’t deserve it. If we lost World War II to the Japanese, if we ultimately one day lose this country to other races, other forces, ultimately we’d have no one to blame but ourselves for not fighting with enough valiance, for not mustering enough strength and power to hold on to what is ours. We have to take responsibility to secure our own future. No one else on this planet owes us anything and we don’t owe them anything. That’s reality.

 

And I want to live in reality. I don’t want to live in this fucked gay ideological delusion that some people in this movement want to live in. And I don’t want to pretend to believe things I don’t believe.

 

A lot of people say:

 

“Hey, look man I don’t really believe this shit either, but it’s going to help us make jews look bad or it’s going to help us win over moderates to our position if we just pretend to believe in it.”

 

I don’t believe in pretending to believe in shit! Pretending to believe in shit is inauthentic. It’s not how we’re going to convince people to stand side by side with us and fight for an objective, is pretending to believe things we don’t believe.

 

The way that we’re going to get men to stand behind us and fight to believe in our cause, believe in our movement, is to actually believe what we believe and say it proudly and openly! To have faith in our ideas, that our ideas are inherently have so much truth and potency and value that they will succeed. That’s how we’re going to win!

 

And yeah I’ve had this argument before with people. They say:

 

“Oh, I’m a universal nationalist. I believe in nationalism for all people.”

 

Well, that’s a nice thing for you to say. So are you going to go and fight for Algerian nationalism? Are you going to go and fight the Sri Lankan nationalism? No, you don’t actually give a fuck about Azerbaijani nationalism or Venezuelan nationalism. You say you believe in everyone’s right being equal to having a nation, but you’re not willing to fight for everyone’s nation. You’re willing to fight for your nation and maybe some brother nations that you have.

 

[1:42:01]

 

So maybe if you’re an Australian, you’d be willing to fight for Britain because that’s the land of your ancestors. You’re willing to fight for Ireland or whatever. If the Americans had a civil war, you’d be willing to go and fight for the White team because they’re our ethnic cousins or something like that. Okay, that makes sense.

 

But if you aren’t really willing to fight and die for it, you don’t actually believe in it, to any significant or deep level that it’s of consequence.

 

So why can’t you just say you’re an Australian nationalist and just say you want to fight for a White Australia? Anyone who has a problem with that, you want to crush them. You want to crush them and destroy them because it’s us or them! That’s what we believe in. Why isn’t that good enough? Good enough for me.

 

Maybe it’s not good enough for you’re a liar. Like, you’re just a liar. You don’t actually really believe what you’re saying. You’re trying to come up with a strategy, like a marketing, like a moral marketing strategy where you pretend to have this morality that’s nice to everyone so that people will allow you to have your own country or something. It doesn’t mean that we should have like zero allies or zero respect for other people. But let’s be real here. Why can’t you’re asserting your own interests in your own and the future of your own people?

 

Like and for example, in Australia, we have a military alliance with Japan. The Japanese are a completely different people. I think the Japanese are an incredible nation, incredible cultural achievements, whatever. I wouldn’t fight for Japan unless it was in Australia. I’d fight for Australia if we were like allied in a war together and it made sense, it was in our interest to fight together against a mutual enemy. But I wouldn’t fight for Japan. I don’t think it would be a good thing if Japan was like, wiped off the face of the planet necessarily. I think they’re interesting, cool people. But I wouldn’t be willing to die to save Japan. So I can respect Japan. Maybe we could have an alliance with Japan if it’s in our interest. But I’m not a Japanese nationalist.

 

I don’t ultimately believe in some metaphysical right that the Japanese have to exist. Ultimately, it’s the responsibility of the Japanese to secure their own existence, and it’s the responsibility of White Australians to secure our own existence. And it’s the responsibility of Palestinians to secure their own existence and the responsibility of whatever group of people it is to secure their own existence on this planet. That’s how it works. That’s the iron Law of Nature. So Modern World reject said:

 

“We cannot negotiate for our existence. We must secure it through struggle.”

 

And he hailed and yeah, that’s basically the essence of my view. Someone said here:

 

“Joel didn’t get the Rabbi Noseberg meme.”

 

No, I did get the meme. I just didn’t think it was that funny. So I did like a kind of deadpan delivery.

 

Now, what else have we got here? I think that’s basically a good show for the evening. So give me some feedback. Did you still enjoy the show, even though it was just me riding solo? Don’t usually do this. I usually have the foil of having someone to talk to. It feels a bit weird just sitting here speaking into, like a laptop. Like, not talking to another human being. Feels a bit inorganic. But I’ve been doing this a long time, so I could still kind of sell it, I think. Jack Brady, given some respect:

 

“Excellent monologue.”

 

Well, I appreciate that. Friend of the show. Obviously been on the show before. High praise.

 

But, yeah, everyone’s seemed to enjoy the stream, so I’m glad you watched. I’m glad you listened. And yeah, got some things coming up. There was an interview by this guy called Hermes from the United States. He does like these street interviews that have been going viral lately. He’s obviously like a nationalist from America. Seems like a solid dude. I haven’t really spoken to him much before, but he interviewed Tom earlier this week, which you can find, I think, on Rumble. And we’re doing a collaboration soon. I’ll put out on my social media on Telegram, when we’re gonna go live. I think soon. I think maybe like Sunday, Australian time, Saturday night American time was the plan. But, yeah, I’ll put it out when it’s all, like, ready to go with links and stuff.

 

And I’m also going to do a collaboration with Ferryman from Canada next week. I think there’s a new Codex India documentary that’s going to be released. And they wanted us to do a kind of Watch Party promotion. The previous one was pretty funny. It was kind of like this David Attenborough narrating, like Pajeets in the Wild. I’m sure a lot of you have seen it. So anyhow, I don’t know what to expect. [chuckling] I haven’t seen it yet, but should be funny.

 

And yeah, there’s a few other things happening. So keep an eye on social media, keep in touch and we’ll fill you in on when we’re doing more content when we’re doing more activism, etc. And if you’re in Australia, join the fucking movement! ! WhiteAustralia.org, WhiteAus.org. If you don’t want to come and be a member of the NSN, marching around on the street, doing street activism, you can join and just come to the community events. You can come and train with us. Kickboxing, weightlifting, barbecues, seminars, we’re putting on more events. Come get involved in the community. At least get networked with fellow White nationalists.

 

And if you don’t even have time for that, at the very least, sign up as a supporter. Put your name down so we can get registered as a political party. We’re getting closer and closer to hitting the target. We haven’t even done an official launch yet. We will get more than enough signatures. Be a member of the party. We need members. So at least sign up as a member or even better, come and join the community. Come and get involved in a more direct capacity. A lot of events are going to be organised through the rest of the year.

 

[1:49:04]

 

The only way that we can turn around the political situation in this country is if White nationalists in Australia come together, join the Organisation, join the party and build a movement that can actually change things. We have the foundation of a movement that has the potential to really make an impact, which we haven’t had in this country for a long time. We’ve created that foundation.

 

The only way that that foundation can go into something actually tangible, making like, real, meaningful change is if everyone gets behind us and backs us. Even if it’s just as simple as just signing up as a member of our political party, which really is not asking for very much at all!

 

So WhiteAustralia.org. Sign up! Join up! You know, don’t you want to see us enter politics in Australia? Wouldn’t that bring you joy? Wouldn’t that be fucking awesome? Like, oh, you don’t want like me and Blair and Tom and shit running for office. You want to fucking vote for, who you voting for? Craig Kelly? You want to vote for Ralph Babet? You want to vote for Pauline Hanson? This shit sucks, man! Help us give awesome candidates! Our policies are going to be amazing! We’re going to break the fucking news cycle. We’re going to have the most interesting political party probably in the whole world. Fucking why have you not signed up yet? Sign up, help us win!

 

But yeah, anyway, so that’s the end of the stream. I hope you enjoyed it. And White power, blood and honour! Hail victory! See you all next time.

 

[1:51:06]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/11/2025 = 35)

J0hnC0nn0r
6 days ago
There is no question, they all need to leave
9 likes

Report
J0hnC0nn0r
6 days ago
You know why they removed the death penalty. Because if they used it in this case then it would be injected into the public consciousness as a solution and then the sheep might get ideas about applying it to other criminals.
7 likes

Report
JoshRecessionberg
Supporter
6 days ago
Society is falling apart with Jewish ‘democracy’
6 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
J0hnC0nn0r
5 days ago
Lets state the obvious
0 likes

Report
Lynchmob11
5 days ago
Awesome show. You should do a weekly solo show where you break down geopolitical events, since the other show is mainly centered upon Aussie politics.
5 likes

Report
SueNewson
5 days ago
you done a great job!
5 likes

Report
natogroyper
5 days ago
Great show, these type of shows that you do where you break down geopolitics from a Australian nationalist perspective are brilliant and its important. It’s something that we need more of. You really come into your own doing this type of content mate
5 likes

Report
leibekohne
6 days ago
Usury free world economy will solved lots of problems including wives staying at home. Also the wars will disappear no financing jew banks. In modern world China has never necessary ability to fight a long war. They could do nothing against small Japan. If that should happens the will end of humanity. Those problems, can be overcome by changing the communist China into Monarchy as used to be.
4 likes

Report
StevenGurr
3 days ago
Kill all pedo fags
3 likes

Report
katana17
6 days ago
[Joel Davis – Nothing is Happening, But It Will – Jun 26, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/06/28/joel-davis-nothing-is-happening-but-it-will-jun-26-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss ZOG vs Iran, Mark Latham vs Minns, the caravan hoax, Trump jews and Epstein, Israel with 200 nukes, JFK assassination, boomers being selfish, Holohoax Card wearing out, WWIII with China vs ZOG, jews not being flashy, Joel dreams of an Aston Martin, miscegenation, Human rights, NSN childcare policy, and current events, etc. – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 21,471 – Duration: 125 mins]
2 likes

Delete
J0hnC0nn0r
6 days ago
I dont agree with your idea to pay the mothers to stay at home instead of childcare, as that doesnt address the root cause of why the wahmen are working in the first place. Usually to pay for the usury loan and every other fucking rip off corporate swine and their small hat masters are perpetrating on the White race. Anything that undermines the ponzi scheme, aka forcing a collapse is the only option.
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
JoshRecessionberg
Supporter
5 days ago
You are a fool. Who is going to support a party advocating for an economic collapse? It is more like an economic transition that will have to be done smoothly and professionally in order to reinvigorate White Australia. Implementing policies in phases is the best approach. Talking about collapse is for low IQ blackpilled degenerates.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
J0hnC0nn0r
5 days ago
Sure thing fuck wit. Lets move jew money for daycare to middle class welfare, banksters dont care they still get their usury bucks, inflate property prices based on the extra income and keep the ponzi scheme going. Just to stick to your ad hominem attacks and idiocy, you clearly are a stupid zoomer cunt rash because this shit was done under Howard and led to much of this fucking mess. The fact you still think this is a viable “policy” when the same Whites sucking off the govt tit will turn on NSN etc when the welfare tap is turned off (transitioned as you put it like a tranny) truly shows how stupid and short sighted you are.
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
1Antonius
3 days ago
People are too degenerate to play moderate with them. They’ll still betray you, it’s in their nature.
0 likes
Report
leibekohne
6 days ago
therefore NSN you must stop drinking even beer drink Kombucha instead. Never slacken be vigilant You must be hard, strong without any remorse and it will require blood, because you waited to long, because you let yourselves your parents to be fooled whilst the internal enemy never stopped only intensified after WW2 He mesmerized us and made us imbecilic morons murdered us lied to us stole from us killed us used us exploited us destroyed us to merely 6% of world population and going down faster and faster to total distinction of Aryan goyim white race wake up shiksa cunts and fight; teach abusive fanatical communist police a hard lesson, give it back.
2 likes

Report
MPCV
Supporter
6 days ago
o/ HH
2 likes

Report
JFurM
Verified
4 days ago
To your point Joel, on the study that covered the 33% drop in fertility of women who go the jab vs those that didn’t… as a woman who previous to Covid, had no fertility issues, I stared having lots of issues with my cycle as well as miscarriages as soon as the vax came out. My husband and I did not get it but most all of our family members did. This is an experience that many other women (not vaccinated) I have spoken with share in common. Potentially due to vaccine shedding and or what they’ve been putting in our water (I.e. Dr Ardis’ work shows this). Either way, agree with what you said about the massive wealth transfer that was going on during covid, and it eerily all began in nov of 2019. Very few people were talking about what was going on with all the major corporations and financial elites at the time. They definitely took advantage though to hurt us health wise, in our economy and as a society. Hopefully enough are awake now to not get fooled again! Great show!
2 likes

Report
Bigboy6669
5 days ago
bump
1 like

Report
palacepony
Supporter
6 days ago
Wuhan Institute entered a partnership with Peter Daszak/ Ecohealth Alliance. Special Cancer virus programs, ‘defense’ programs, theres beeb decades of work on G.O.F virus manipulation. See pizzapicklespur on X, also Charles Rixey (prometheusshrugged.org.) See Major Murphy’s release of the D.E.F.U.S.E document. Rixey will take you there. Research into Covid amyloidogenic properties continues @ mccairndojo.com. Support the doc; https://rumble.com/v6uyxpb-lab-updates-synthesizing-amyloidogenic-fibrin.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
6 days ago
https://t.wtyl.live/videos/browse?s=1
0 likes

Report
palacepony
Supporter
5 days ago
succinct overview; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OHBkkZeqms
0 likes

Report
TripleGas
Verified
5 days ago
need to kick out and block nons from entry before implementing anything like paying for mothers to stay home or it’s just another incentive for them to come and breed.
0 likes

Report
Kroninn
Supporter
5 days ago
Taiwan has around 2 million private gun owners. I dont think it would be too easy for China to invade them. Especially with the Philipines and others helping them.
0 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
4 days ago
Colac constitutional restoration conference in Colac upcoming late July; https://rumble.com/v6vqyl7-2-seminars-26th-27th-july-augusto-zimmermann-darren-dixon-and-tim-dwyer.html
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Trump is not American either. His mother is from Scotland. And his father could be a German jew if you look at Fred Trump’s physiognomy. Trump is also a New Yorker.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Trump is not founding stock American like us that have been here since the 1600s.
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Israel sucks at colonization. Look at a settler colonial nation that was White, and had no outside funding. America, Australia, Canada. Jews have all the money on the world and still can’t make a nation larger than new jersey.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Jews are the laziest parasite bastards ever known. They should have listened to Hitler when he said they can live comfortably on Madagascar, but they resisted, now their final fate will be worse.
0 likes

Report
amacc14
Supporter
4 days ago
Democracy is fake and stupid. Listen to us, we’re sitting around, brainstorming how to get VOTES. Pathetic.
0 likes

Report
localsussybaka
4 days ago
The political analysis gets more compelling each day.
0 likes

Report
MattOosty
3 days ago
A stream/space with Karl would be amazing
0 likes

Report
PhooeyPhoxide
21 hours ago
Joel overrates the CCP. They can’t even take Taiwan. No way China is even going to put a dent in the New World Order.
0 likes

Report
BrossefStalin
5 days ago
Blair is so fragile. Always talking about how tired he is or how he feels weird. He had to get up early and it took him over the edge? Man up
-2 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live another episode of the show and to start us off. Superchat from Death Culture saying for the NSN war chest. And yeah, we’re getting straight into it. Big show for you this evening. Blair wasn’t around last week, so we’ve got a bit to catch up on. A lot to break down in international politics. Interesting, interesting stuff to cover.

 

There’s been a bit of a theme over recent weeks which is kind of going to continue into this episode.

 

But yeah, I want to reflect upon what’s happened in this Israel, Iran situation because on one level nothing happened, which was my prediction, but on a deeper level, something is going to happen, for many, many reasons, which we will get into in the broader situation. Interesting stuff as well in Australian politics. Mark Latham going to war against Chris Minns in New South Wales over these Hate Speech laws and the role of the jewish lobby and so on. Interesting to discuss that among other things.

 

But before we get into it. How you doing, Blair? You came for the show this evening?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, man! Got a lot I want to ask you. Get your take on a few things.

 

As you said, there’s been some international politics, which is not my favourite kind of politics, but I’d still like to get a comprehensive understanding. To get a bit of a Joel Davis take a series of Joel Davis takes on what’s been going on. But I’ve got an early start in the morning, that’s why., … Sorry.

 

Joel Davis: I was going to say you. It seems like you’ve had a bit to say about this as well.

 

Blair Cottrell: So, yeah, my takes are kind of, …

 

Joel Davis: Interesting to get your breakdown.

 

Blair Cottrell: I haven’t really had the opportunity to really read into it and develop a full understanding. I’m kind of just going with my gut. I’m surprised the way it turned out. Like Trump shouldn’t have been able to bomb another country and then two days later step in to supervise a peace deal with the country he just bombed. Like on paper that shouldn’t be possible, but he somehow pulled that off. He did that. I don’t know how Trump makes stuff like that work, but I don’t know. He’s an interesting individual. We’ve discussed that on previous shows.

 

But yeah, like I was saying, I’ve got a really early start in the morning, so I asked Joel if we could start a little bit earlier. That’s why we’re kicking off just after 8:00.

 

But yeah, lots to discuss. Should be a good stream. Where do we want to start now? Is Joel coming through blurry for anyone else or is that just me? I might have to have a look at my Internet connection here. We’re both coming through clear here. Or Joel’s blurry. What are you guys seeing at home?

 

Joel Davis: Not seeing much in the chat either way. Yeah, we got blurry. Yeah. Well, I think it’s a connection issue. One second. You can entertain the crowd.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s getting a little better.

 

Joel Davis: Entertain the crowd.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s pretty clear now. Warm up the warm up the device, I suppose. Man, it’s cold times down here in Australia. Middle of winter.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it has been cold. And on the subject of seasons, that was going to be one of the themes for the episode this evening for me, because one thing that I have learnt in politics, politics works by season. So, like, for example there’s been big riots and protests in the United States recently. I remember around this time last year, there were big riots in the UK, race riots. Because it’s the summertime in the Northern Hemisphere, those kinds of things tend to only happen in summer. Down here in Australia, it’s winter. During the winter time period, not much is happening politically, everyone kind of switches off, hunker down. And Australian politics generally, I mean, it’s not that eventful at the best of times, but it’s especially not eventful during winter.

 

And I think that’s true across the board. I remember last year, it did kind of feel like things were a little stagnant through the winter time. And then as soon as we got into the springtime, all of a sudden it was all action. There was just rallies all the time and controversies. And it felt like there was a lot of forward pressure into the summertime. You know, a lot happened on Australia Day and so on around then through the summertime, momentum built up and expressed itself.

 

Then there’s all these legal cases that are upon us and we move into the wintertime and kind of hunker back down. That seems to be how it works in politics.

 

So a lot of people are pressuring us:

 

“When is the political party going to be launched? When’s the political party going to be launched?”

 

Well, it actually wouldn’t make sense to launch it in the wintertime. Would make a hell of a lot more sense to launch it at the complete opposite time of the year when there’s a lot more energy and there’s a lot more vitality in the people and in politics.

 

So at the moment, we’re on our kind of winter kind of lull down here in Australia, but internationally things are kicking off. And yeah, I think the biggest story obviously is its the to and fro between Israel and Iran, which came to an abrupt halt. Obviously last weekend you had, remember looking at my phone, Sunday morning we had a Yuletide celebration and many of the boys, so we’re awake up, kind of like hungover from Yuletide festivities on the Saturday night, the winter solstice down here in Australia. We’re driving down to the servo and I pull my phone out and it’s like:

 

“Holy shit, Trump just bombed Iran!”

 

It was very quick. Like, it was like Trump announced it on Truth Social, his social media site, before anyone else touched it.

 

[06:13]

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you use that, Truth Social?

 

Joel Davis: It seems like only Trump uses it and maybe, I guess his biggest supporters.

 

But anyway, I had to go on his Truth Social and check, is this real? It was real. And he was, he kind of had this tone of like:

 

“All right, we’ve blown up the nuclear sites, this is done. If Iran stands down, we’ll just call it sweet, we’ll move on.”

 

And in the days since, you know, reports came out saying:

 

“Well, I don’t think they really effectively took out their nuclear program.”

 

Israel were talking a lot tougher. Even Trump himself was talking a lot tougher, talking about regime change. Iran were claiming they were going to have a big retaliation. Then Iran did a symbolic retaliation immediately. We’re getting a ceasefire, apparently. And Trump somehow even seemed to restrain Israel, which surprised a lot of analysts, where apparently there was a loose Iranian missile that was a bit late, just kind of missed the cut-off point for the ceasefire, allegedly, or whatever.

 

And so Israel sent all their jets. And then you see Trump coming out saying:

 

“Israel doesn’t know what the fuck it’s doing!”

 

To the world media, and making all these posts on his social media saying the Israeli planes can just wave hello and then they’re going to turn around and fly home. Don’t bomb anyone. We’re having a ceasefire. It was kind of interesting political theatre, but it managed to hold. And in the days since, it’s been kind of interesting. Trump has been very supportive of Israel, supportive of Benjamin Netanyahu, but at the same time ignores the intelligence reports that say that the nuclear sites weren’t properly destroyed. Says that’s all fake news. They’ve relaxed sanctions on Iran after the so-called ceasefire, but no negotiation seems to have taken place. There’s no deal. Iran has left the IAEA, which is the world leading kind of body or whatever for inspecting nuclear sites.

 

So what’s the solution here exactly? Like, it seems like the cans just being kicked down the road, but nothing’s actually been resolved.

 

Now, I personally don’t think it’s a problem if Iran gets nuclear weapons. In fact, I’m totally cool with them getting nuclear weapons. And I don’t think that it’s could be a problem that we deal with. But obviously from the perspective of Trump and the Zionists who control America, that’s a big problem. And from the perspective of Israel, it’s a big problem. So it’s kind of surprising to see that.

 

And a lot of people said:

 

“Well, how come that happened?”

 

And the reason why I was predicting that this kind of something like this would happen from the very beginning was not because I don’t think Zionists control America or I don’t think the jews have the levers of power. Quite the opposite. Obviously. The reason why I predicted this was because the United States has got more issues right now than just Iran and Israel.

 

Back in 2003, when the United States invaded Iraq, America was by far the world’s most powerful country. The richest, strongest. No one came close to the United States in 2003. And no one dared challenge the international order and their power and authority basically anywhere in the world. Like Russia and China totally like acquiesced to the invasion of Iraq and said:

 

“Okay, do it.”

 

So America was able to just break international law, do whatever it wanted, obviously at the behest of Israel at the time, and get away with it and just flush trillions of dollars down the toilet and deploy all its military, and nothing happened.

 

However, today it’s a very different global situation. You’ve got an active war in Ukraine, Russia’s committed there. And Trump came in to the presidency trying to come to some kind of peace deal there to neutralise relations with the Russians in order to be able to pivot to China, which is the real big deal. China is obviously potential superpower, a rising peer competitor of the United States. And there’s the issue of Taiwan, where if China moves on Taiwan, that could trigger World War Three, where the United States is obligated to defend Taiwan to hold together its position in the East Asian region.

 

Then you’ve got China versus America, two most powerful countries in the world. That’s World War Three. So what happens if America goes in and invades China, Iran right now? Well, they completely ruined their negotiating position with the Russians in Ukraine.

 

And they also are basically inviting the Chinese, like:

 

“Hey, why don’t you just invade Taiwan right now because we’re over committed and you’re never going to get a golden opportunity like this.”

 

So I think because of that broader situation, even though of course the jews who run America are no fans of Iran, there’s a limitation on what they can do. And I think that’s what we saw just happen.

 

And so the reason why nothing happened this time is because a much larger happening is on the horizon, I think it’s basically inevitable that a much larger war will occur over the next few years.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I was going to ask you. And you already answered the question I was going to ask you. Obviously this back and forth between Iran and Israel isn’t going to become a World War Three situation. It’s not a broad scale war. It’s kind of petty, a bit of a nothing burger. That’s what it turned out to be anyway. And you rightfully sort of predicted that, or not really predicted it, but you just called it for what it was before anybody else did, as far as I can tell.

 

So what is the World War III situation? Does that have to involve China and Taiwan? Is that your perspective?

 

[12:00]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, now if things flare up again between Iran and Israel, which seems inevitable because there isn’t much of a conclusion here to what’s happened, that could invite the Chinese in, they get to make a move.

 

Blair Cottrell: What about the other way around? If China tries something with Taiwan and America’s tied up in that, then I suppose hostilities could flare up between Iran and Israel again because they would expect the Americans to be distracted by whatever’s happening.

 

Joel Davis: Well, that would maybe play in Iran’s favour, you would think, because they would think, oh well, Israel’s now undefended. But what Israel showed, I think, in this engagement was that it has a military dominance over Iran, like of the two sides, the Iranians took a lot more damage than Israel. And there’s a thousand miles between two countries. Very difficult for either country to conduct a proper war with one another, whether there’s actually fighting on the ground, which is why historically Iran has been kind of backing Hezbollah and things like that. Groups that are actually bordering with the United States. Sorry, with Israel!

 

But it’s kind of like a sideshow. You know, the deeper and more profound reality is America versus China. And there’s two very interesting historians that have co written a few books together. One of them is dead now and what is coined as the Strauss Howe generational theory. I’ve been reading a book called the Fourth Turning, which was co-authored by these two historians in the late 90s. They have a kind of generational theory of American history where they say:

 

“Well, in order to understand history, you have to kind of understand it through the prism of every 21 years or so.”

 

Generations emerge and kind of swap social roles, whether they be the children, the young adults, the midlife types or the elderly.

 

And as each generational shift happens, there’s a shift in mood and a paradigm shift basically in the overarching society. And they plot this onto Anglo-American history. And what they find is that they kind of come in fours. There’s kind of like a cycle of four generations, which makes up the average kind of lifespan of a healthy human being. And how basically every kind of lifespan every 85 years or so in American history, or even going back into British history prior to that, you get a crisis.

 

And so you had World War II about 85 years before that you had the Civil War about 85 years before that you had the American Revolutionary war about 85 years before that you had the Glorious Revolution in Britain where Stuart monarchy was deposed. And there’s a huge paradigm shift at the time and so on. And you keep kind of cycling back and finding these parallels. And so according to this theory, which is eerily accurate in a lot of its predictions and its analyses, basically now between the next few years is supposed to be the kind of crescendo of the crisis point where something like a World War II or Civil War type level happening is supposed to occur in American history.

 

And at the same time as you have this theory, there’s also many theorists of war history who describe how you have these 95 to 100 year cycles, roughly speaking, that occur between kind of wars that reset the global political order that have been occurring every 90, 95 years or so throughout European history.

 

And again, we’re kind of reaching that point where the next, …

 

Blair Cottrell: So we’re overdue.

 

Joel Davis: Well, we’re basically, if it happens soon, we’re right on time. We’re right on time. And it does feel like there’s this kind of air of inevitability where you know, you have something called Thucydides Trap. Thucydides was an ancient Greek historian. He wrote about Peloponnesian War. He wrote about the war between Athens and Sparta.

 

And basically you have this situation where this tendency in military history and political history where you’ll have a dominant power in a region or in this case in the world that’ll enjoy after a great victory in a major war, a period of dominance.

 

And then eventually they’ll have somewhat of a decline and a new challenger will arise, a new great power will arise, and the status quo that was kind of set up under the dominance of the original power will eventually be challenged by this emerging new power because they’ll become too powerful to basically accept the subordinate position. And when this occurs, it’s basically inevitable that these two powers will go to war. And it’s almost like all throughout human history, you see this happen again and again and again and again!

 

In the early 20th century, you saw basically the dominance of the British Empire, the rise of Germany. They challenge one another. America ends up inheriting the position of the British and finishing the job. But you see this time and time again. And that’s obviously what’s happening now with China, where in the last, you know, few decades, China has become so wealthy, has had so much growth, and they’re building incredible amounts of military hardware, their navy’s swelling, all their tech is developing very rapidly, like military tech. And from the Chinese perspective, Taiwan is part of China.

 

In fact, from, even from the American perspective, technically, Taiwan is part of China. Everyone agrees because Taiwan was actually controlled by China. After the Second World War concluded, where you had an alliance between the Nationalists and the Communists to fight the Japanese in China. The Nationalists and the Communists started fighting one another. The Communists won. The Nationalists basically were pushed back onto the island of Taiwan and they basically were stuck there ever since. And the Americans initially protected the Nationalists from the Chinese and had the ambition perhaps of like, reinvading China and putting the Nationalists back in power over the Communists, but that never happened.

 

And so basically it’s like this Chinese civil war that was never fully resolved. So from China’s perspective, like America deciding it would be like imagining if we had a war in Australia between the Left and the Right, and then the losing group had got exiled to Tasmania, we would still consider Tasmania part of Australia. Whoever won would want Tasmania back. And if then America.

 

[19:18]

 

Blair Cottrell: How did China end up losing control?

 

Joel Davis: You’re not allowed to invade Tasmania. That’s against the rules. We would be like, cool. Like fuck you!

 

Blair Cottrell: But how did China lose Taiwan in the first place?

 

Joel Davis: Well, the Nationalists, Taiwan is controlled by Chinese people as well, but they’re just the Nationalist group that were pushed out by the Communists. But they’re ethnically Chinese.

 

Blair Cottrell: Exclusive political structure.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but like, Taiwan has been conquered by other powers throughout history. Like, it was conquered by the Japanese at one point, it was conquered by the Portuguese at one point and so on. But Taiwan is more or less Chinese.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I had a couple of feelings regarding Donald Trump. Just paying attention to his body language, his speeches.

 

I feel like he has Israel fatigue. I feel like Trump is kind of fed up with Israel. And someone in the comments triggered that thought in me. I noticed that in Trump. I noticed that in his demeanor. It feels like he’s annoyed by Israel. He’s sick of Israel, but he doesn’t really openly admit it. He’s still playing the game, but he definitely seems frustrated. More frustrated with Israel than he was by Iran, I think. But he’s still trying to make it seem like he’s kind of equally annoyed by both of them, probably a little bit more by Iran, because nuclear bombs or whatever.

 

But I also got the sensation that isn’t Donald Trump just a stereotypical merchant? I’m not saying nations should be at war with each other, but it is a natural thing. And Trump mentioned many times, why can’t they just go back to trading? They’re excellent trading. Iran great trading. Not traitors as in betraying, but trading like buying and selling.

 

And it’s like a merchant, the big international merchants stepping in and saying:

 

“Hey, guys, stop killing each other. There’s money to be made. Don’t you guys want to make money? Let’s just keep trading and getting rich. Use your population to generate more wealth and start trading those resources. Why fight for something you believe in when you can make money?”

 

That’s kind of how it felt, right? They were the feelings that I had observing Trump’s reaction to this whole debacle between those two nations.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I think that’s an accurate assessment.

 

Also, Trump does have this tendency to kind of do some big individual military action, like where he does like a big, well publicized bombing or something, and then goes, all right, let’s negotiate a piece. Trump is very averse to long drawn out wars.

 

But I think it’s also because I think Trump and his people are aware of what I was describing about China. And their entire strategy seems to be trying to get the affairs in order of the empire broadly, so that they’re able to focus on the threat of China, because that’s why Trump is going easy on the Russians and why he’s trying to come to the table with Putin and make a deal where Biden was not looking at doing that. Not because Trump is some Russian agent or something. I don’t think you could argue that he’s a jewish agent, but you can’t argue that he’s a Russian agent. I don’t think there’s evidence for that.

 

But the reason why he’s doing that is because of pragmatism. It’s just simply the assessment that if you’re going to go to war with China, you don’t also want to have the Russians on the side of the Chinese against you and fight on two fronts. You’d rather neutralise the Russians so that you can take on the Chinese directly. And that’s kind of what he’s trying to do. He’s trying to kind of change the state of play. And Israel is just a thorn in his side because Israel is just focused upon Israel’s narrow individual interests,

 

Blair Cottrell: Ethnocentric interests.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course, of course. And for Israel, this is a golden opportunity. Israel have been pretty successful in their conflict with Hamas. They were successful against Hezbollah in their recent battle. The Assad regime fell in Syria.

 

So all these dominoes are falling all around them. And it’s like, now there’s. Now they’ve got the chance to go and try and force the issue on Iran. They’ve got their guy Trump in office who they think they can get something out of because they’ve got leverage over him. He’s embedded in all these jewish power structures.

 

You know, I remember when we talked about it on the show a few weeks ago when there was discussion about Trump and Epstein, because it was brought up. Oh, what happened here?

 

Blair Cottrell: You lost your camera by the look.

 

All right, well, I’m expecting Joel to be back momentarily. Here he is. Seems to be having some technical issues, and I’m not sure I have. The mental acurity. Is acurity a word.q

 

What I’m trying to say is I don’t believe I have the necessary knowledge to follow on with that point. I just can’t see your face. I can hear you, but I can’t see you.

 

[24:33]

 

Joel Davis: What the fuck is going on? One second. Yeah, it’s mental acuity.

 

Blair Cottrell: Acuity. Right, right. I always have the right word in my memory bank. But A, I don’t actually know what it means, and B, I often mispronounce it, but the word is in the bank. It’s the strangest thing. It’s like well, why do I know the right word to use if I can’t even be sure of what it means? Words often sound like what you want them to mean. What I mean is words mean what they sound like they mean. Have you found that with English? That’s what I think.

 

Anyway. What I’m saying is sometimes I’m thinking and the right words just come to me and I don’t know why that happens. Sometimes I don’t even know what they mean. And that’s an example of that right there.

 

But anyway, you’re back now, so continue. What was it you were saying?

 

Joel Davis: Oh, what I was saying was that this was discussed when Elon Musk had his flame out against Trump a few weeks ago and then mentioned that:

 

“Well, why do you think the Epstein files haven’t been released? Well, it’s because they implicate Trump.”

 

Or whatever it was that he said. I don’t remember the words exactly. Well, there’s something to that because Trump and Epstein were like best buddies from the late 80s to the early 2000s. All these videos of them partying together.

 

In fact, Epstein even described Trump as one of his best friends in an interview in the 90s. Trump said many great things, positive things about Jeffrey Epstein, including:

 

“Jeffrey Epstein. You know, he’s got a he loves the women, particularly those on the younger side. He’s a lot like me.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that what he actually said?

 

Joel Davis: Something like that. Okay, yeah.

 

I can’t remember the exact quote, but it was something words to that effect. I can look it up.

 

But the reason why they fell out in the mid 2000s. I shared a really good post on this by Devon Stack, also known as Black Pilled, was because Jeffrey Epstein was trying to buy some mansion in Florida somewhere like Palm beach or something, and Trump outbid him and got the place off him. And it ruined their friendship. Jeffrey was pissed off that Trump screwed him on some deal, took this place that he wanted to buy. And they fell out because of that. Not because Trump realised that he was a pedo or something or that he was a Mossad agent. Trump’s family have been long time friends of the jews. His dad was massive business partner to the jews. All kinds of awards from the jewish community in New York and guys that were doing the whole Jeffrey Epstein thing before Jeffrey Epstein were close friends of the Trump family and so on.

 

So this connection between Trump and Israel goes beyond just money. It wasn’t like Trump just got bought out by Zionist owners. The connection goes much deeper and much further.

 

But my point being that, yes, even though Trump is a massive philo-semite and a supporter of Israel. You know what Israel are asking for at the moment is go and start a war that could potentially destroy the entire American empire. Because we would like you to. It’s not actually necessary. Like if Iran gets nuclear weapons, they’re not going to use them against Israel unless Israel shoot them at them first. Like Israel has 200 nukes. Like Iran’s not going to just start lobbing nukes crazily at Israel and get itself nuked into oblivion just because they’re angry anti-semites or whatever the fuck they’re saying.

 

Blair Cottrell: It would give Iran leverage obviously though, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it would basically protect them. It would deter Israel or America or whatever from fucking with them in the way that they just did, but to a larger degree in a way that could actually destabilise the regime there. So it’s just an act of self defense the fact that if they were to build nuclear weapons, so it’s ridiculous!

 

And then Israel’s complaining about Iran not following certain protocols. Israel hasn’t even formally acknowledged that it has nuclear weapons even though it has 200. Everyone knows that they have about 200 nukes. Those nuclear weapons were illegally stolen off the United States. There’s a lot of, is a lot of credible evidence that the reason why JFK was assassinated was because he was trying to stop Israel getting nuclear weapons. He was an opponent of their nuclear program. He didn’t want them getting nuclear weapons. And then look what happened to him.

 

And then Israel is not a signatory to the non-Proliferation Treaty. Pretty much every country in the world in the 60s and the 70s there was a decision made, okay, we’ve got to like stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons around the world. Obviously it was a bit of gate-keeping by the Soviet Union and the United States, but they were saying let’s stop, let’s shut down nuclear testing. This could be really bad for the environment. It slowed the proliferation of nuclear weapons and most of the countries in the world have signed up to it. Israel never signed it and Iran did. Iran has signed it.

 

So they’re trying to hold Iran to account for rules that they refuse to adhere to. It’s just insane! Like it’s the chutzpah of these kikes. So it isn’t necessary. Like from Israel’s standpoint they’re just greedy. They’re just like, they can see their enemy is in a weak position. They’ve knocked out a lot of its or kind of defeated groups like Hezbollah. They’ve knocked out Assad’s regime in Syria, which is an ally of Iran.

 

[30:17]

 

And so now they’re just trying to take a swing for the throat or they think they’ve got a chance. And Trump’s like:

 

“Fuck! Like, this is the last thing I need right now!”

 

He had like 5 million people in the streets protesting his presidency the other day. There’s the beanner anti-deportation riots happening. This happens. And then so many Trump allies, like Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon and so on, come out against Trump, against the war.

 

And a lot of the base, a lot of the people who support Trump, like what Tucker Carlson is saying, like what Steve Bannon is saying, like what even further Right commentators, people like Nick Fuentes, whatever, what these people are saying, Alex Jones. A lot of big commentators in the United States came out against this and the people were with them, particularly young people. So, it’s politically a disaster for Trump, but then also it’s geopolitically just like the last thing that they need right now.

 

And then, not to mention economically, like, if they went to war with Iran because of what it would do to oil prices and so on, it could completely fuck up the economy in a very serious way. So there’s just like this cascading set of crises that would be unleashed by it, which is why he was keen to just try and get it over and done with and move on and re-establish the status quo that previously existed. Because it’s kind of like a nightmare situation, no matter how much he loves Israel.

 

And I think that’s why what happened, happened. But it will probably flare up again before the end of the year because Israel is going to force the issue. Iran, I mean, they’re probably trying to make nuke secretly now. I saw a good article written by someone, I can’t remember who it was. I sent it to you like the other day.

 

Blair Cottrell: I know you did. I know which one you’re going to reference.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, like the one saying, obviously Kim Jong Un and the North Koreans have indicated, just build your nuke secretly and then test them and then flex your muscles because no one will touch you because North Korea’s got a bunch of nuclear weapons pointed at South Korea. Matter how much international condemnation there is of their regime, people just accept that it’s just, it exists and there’s nothing you can do about it. And that’s probably what Iran should do and what they’re probably going to try and do.

 

And apparently they’ve still got some of the reports that came out were saying that they’ve still got a lot of enriched uranium hidden somewhere, that they’ve still got reactors hidden, like hidden in other places that weren’t blown up, or that the Fordo site wasn’t destroyed properly, etc, etc.

 

So what happens in three or four months when the Israelis and other war hawks for war with Iran start leaking things to the press saying Iran are building nukes and they’ve rebuilt one of these nuclear sites or whatever? Like, Trump can call it fake news now, but, like, he probably will respond to that kind of pressure.

 

And so then what if, you know, Israel kick it off again, then what? Seems hard to imagine this situation would just magically go away.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you think jewish people have overplayed the Holocaust card? Because I noticed that Netanyahu, in his speech justifying his initial attack on Iran, he said something to the effect of, we can’t allow Iran to nuclear Holocaust us. And then I read an article that was published by Sky News from the, I believe, CEO, who was it? The CEO of the Australian jewish association or something? I think it’s probably just a guy at a desk. It’s nothing serious. But he was published by Sky News. And in the article, I’m pretty sure he mentions Holocaust like five or six times. And I’m thinking, and I didn’t actually read the article, I just wanted to count how many times he mentioned the Holocaust. And I’m thinking, am I the only one doing this, or am I the only one so worn down by the overuse of the Holocaust term because of the politics that I’ve been into? Or is everyone starting to feel this way? Is everybody starting to notice? I don’t know if this is something that people could relate to, but it’s just the justification for everything.

 

Remember that journalists, the Australian journalist, I think he was from ABC perhaps, who interviewed that spokesperson from Israel and said:

 

“So Israel is allowed to have nuclear warheads because Holocaust?”

 

And the spokesperson got really offended and actually walked out of the interview. He’s like, you’re being disrespectful. I’m not doing this interview, right?

 

So I can’t be the only one that’s noticing it. If even ABC journalists are noticing it. Like ABC journalists, I think, are notorious Leftists in Australia. People don’t like them very much. They’re generally very politically biased and even they’re sick of Israel. Jewish people just using Holocaust to justify everything and anything. What do you think? Do you think the general public, the population, do you think for them the Holocaust is starting to become a bit of an eye roll.

 

[35:14]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think you’re seeing it more with Leftists. They’re dismissing the Holocaust. Not that they’re not denying that it happened part. They’re dismissing it on the issue of Israel. I saw a clip from, I think it was Piers Morgan show and Piers Morgan has kind of been inviting on, he’s kind of seeking out controversy with his show. He’ll invite on people that will often debate the Israel-Palestine issue from both sides and he’ll try to interview like Andrew Tate or people like that because he’s going for clicks.

 

And anyway, I can’t remember who the jew was, but they had Anna Kasperian, I think her name is. She’s on the Young Turks program. She’s like Left leaning, like Bernie Sanders, supporting Democrat, but obviously she’s anti-Israel. And her rhetoric. I’ve noticed, I’ve seen quite a few clips from her and she’s a pretty popular commentator in the United States on the Left. Her rhetoric has gone to like full on like ZOG, like it’s a Zionist Occupied Government. Israel control our government. It’s not just, oh, these Christians and White supremacists hate brown people or whatever or these crazy Christians with this insane biblical theories about Israel. It’s like a direct, like Israel, the Mossad, they control our government. What’s going on with Jeffrey Epstein, you know, blah, blah, blah. Talking points that you would hear on the far-Right from people that we associate with. Right on that specific issue.

 

And anyway, the jew, she was debating about whether what’s happening in is in Gaza constitutes a genocide or something like that. He brought up the Holocaust and he’s saying this is not a real genocide. Real genocides are like the Holocaust. Like that’s a real genocide and that’s what happened to our people. And she was like, shut the fuck up! I’m sick of hearing about the Holocaust. How you guys just keep using that. I don’t care about the fucking Holocaust anymore. You’re doing a fucking genocide now! And that’s kind of interesting. You’re seeing that sentiment more from Leftists.

 

And then at the same time was a great exchange between Senator Gerard Rennick and some jew on Twitter that I posted a screenshot of the other day. The jew said:

 

“My family was wiped out in the Holocaust and for over 2,000 years my people were persecuted everywhere they went!”

 

Blah, blah, blah.

 

And then he just kind of shot back with:

 

“I have Celtic heritage. We’ve been persecuted for 2,000 years since the Romans touched us up. Did we go on about it, no, no one cares about your claims of 2,000 years of persecution!”

 

So it was nice to see Rennick fire back too.

 

And so you’re seeing more emboldening from people that are., … Because the anti-zionist, anti-Israel position is now becoming dominant. Basically people under the age of 40, people who get their politics primarily from a media diet of social media rather than mainstream media. Most people are anti-zionists, whether they’re Left-wing or Right-wing. It’s the only thing both sides can seemingly agree on at this point is fuck Israel basically. And yeah, so I think you’re onto something with that. I don’t think the Holocaust is really kind of maintaining the same kind of mystique that it once had.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, I mean, I’m seeing people who I know, clients, relatives of clients. Like I’ll be in the middle of a job and one of my clients will say:

 

“Oh, my brother just sent me this.”

 

Because we talk about politics in a light hearted way.

 

And it’s like a meme, you know the Jaws movie, how there’s a picture of the shark kind of looking up at the I think it’s a woman, or a man swimming on the surface of the water and someone’s just changed the shark to a giant nose and it’s jews instead of Jaws. And he’s like showing it to me, laughing at me, sorry, laughing with me about it. And I’m thinking, this wouldn’t have happened five or six years ago. This is the sort of thing you would only find on Telegram five or six years ago. Now it’s just everywhere and standard people are laughing about it. This kind of anti-semitic meme propaganda.

 

So I’m not sure where that’s going long term.

 

However, I did have a thought. I believe it was yesterday or the day before. I started thinking about why we were censored from X. And I shared my thoughts with you on this briefly as well yesterday, I think. To summarize, I said if all this stuff is allowed on X, all of this, like Nazi material, anti-semitic memes and so forth, then why are we banned? Like, what does that say?

 

Basically, I realised that it’s probably part of a deliberate system to ban the options, because regular people, it’s always effective for regular people to start changing their opinions in favour of what we stand for. Obviously that’s effective, but it’s only effective up to a certain point because people, at the end of the day, they need to do something with that opinion, they need someone to vote for or they need a group to join, they need a party to join, they need to start paying a membership for an organisation, they need to get involved or they need to at least vote for someone who has a bit of a plan. But if they remove all the people with a plan, if they delete the options, then it doesn’t matter what kind of content people are exposed to. If they can’t do anything with the opinions that content is forming in their minds, then it doesn’t, it just doesn’t matter. It doesn’t actually translate into real or affecting real political change.

 

And I think that’s the whole point behind the censorship, at least. What do you think? Because you’ve got people like Nick Fuentes, they’re still allowed on X and there’s other influences and podcasters and so forth. But that kind of ties into what I’m saying, because what are they doing to affect political change? They’re sitting in a studio just talking shit, which is fine. It doesn’t really solve any problems, does it? It doesn’t give people options.

 

But anyone who comes forward as a real option, representing a real new nationalist solution, a new political party that’s actually going to challenge the two party hamster wheel in your respective country or region, then you’re banned, then you’re censored in clusters, all of your colleagues were involved, everyone LinkedIn gets banned at the same time, usually at the request of the hamster wheel two party system in your respective region. What do you think about that? Do you reckon that’s what’s going on?

 

[41:55]

 

Joel Davis: No, definitely, I think, yeah. Basically everyone who tries to set up a proper organisation, a party in particular, that people can rally behind, we all got mass banned only when we started making noise that we’re going to start a political party. And I don’t think that’s a coincidence. It was partly because we were gaining kind of lift off with popular resonance and things like that as well.

 

But yeah, you notice a similar thing in Britain. I’ve seen a similar thing, you know, where like all the Patriotic Alternative guys all got banned all at once when they had some successful public action.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s the thing, they’re an option. It doesn’t matter what people’s opinions are if they can’t vote for someone or join some group that’s presenting themselves as an option, a solution. So if the options are banned, I think that’s the game. So everything just becomes content for the sake of content where you’re just scrolling your X feed and you’re seeing all these great funny, Nazi, anti-semitic memes, but there’s no one you can actually, you can laugh with your friends about it and stuff, but you can still only vote for Liberal or Labor. There’s still no known organisation that you can actually join because you don’t know about anything like that going on. Because everyone who represents anything like that gets censored instantly.

 

And I think that’s the way censorship will continue to pan out moving forward. Plenty of memes, plenty of content, but you’ll just be expected to sit there drooling on yourself, consuming that content, and there won’t actually be an option for you, despite your changing opinion.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so they don’t mind people talking about the problems, but they don’t want anyone putting forward an actual solution.

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s changed though? Because they used to hate people talking about the problems. You used to be banned instantly for even trying to bring the problem up.

 

So why suddenly don’t they care about people? It might be that they’ve realised people need that option. And without the option, it doesn’t actually matter what people talk about or what they consume.

 

Joel Davis: I think it’s just that the ability for the powers that be to impose the level of censorship that they were getting away with a few years ago has declined.

 

There’s been a resurgence in the value of freedom of speech. They overstepped the mark. They started going after in America in particular, where all these platforms are run out of, they started going after conservatives, like main mainline conservatives that are not even that radical.

 

I mean, they banned Trump from Twitter for fuck sake. They banned like a sitting president from the platform. So they overstepped the mark.

 

And so then there was a course correction where the American Right asserted freedom of speech and asserted itself on these platforms. Elon Musk buys Twitter. They set up Rumble. The kind of information space gets shifted. Zuckerberg also kind of personally shifted more to the Right.

 

And so this TikTok which has run out of China, there was a changing landscape that emerged that these sites were forced to adapt to.

 

But at the end of the day, when it comes to Australia or Europe or even I think in America where I saw examples of this, like I remember when the National Justice Party existed in the United States, like they all got banned and then you couldn’t even post, like at this, at this point, you can’t actually post our website on Twitter.

 

But I remember that that was true for their website as well. So they really target.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s your White Australia website, is that right?

 

Joel Davis: Correct. White Australia.org or WhiteAus.org, both are banned.

 

Blair Cottrell: What happens when that party actually gets registered? Well, then can it still be targeted for censorship to that degree? Where we can actually be posted on a public social media platform where there’s millions of Australians are joined up to that platform.

 

I mean, they talk about election interference through social media, but that’s exactly what these social media companies do against anyone, you know, right of centre. Usually the greatest election interference is happening amongst X staff right now.

 

But yeah, as I said, it ties back into the sort of perspective that I had over the last couple of days that the whole agenda is to ban the options, is to let people just talk about whatever they want now. To give people the illusion of freedom of speech. But nothing that they can actually do with that freedom of speech that’s going to affect the course of politics in their region. Sit there and watch some streamer, say some stuff about Hitler and wring your hands together and feel good inside about it, laugh about it, get excited about it, but then you still got to go vote for red or blue.

 

At the end of the day, that’s all there is. Anybody else presenting anything else, especially nationalistic, in essence, they get nuked, they get censored, and I think that’s the way the system will slug on forward into the future.

 

[47:11]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I can imagine like say we have World War III against China. I could imagine the system being allowing a lot of anti-Chinese racism to profligate online and in fact encouraging it and having propagandists that frame the war in terms most amenable to people like you and I actually support a war with China. I don’t support starting one, but I support it if it’s necessary. I support trying to win if it happens.

 

Blair Cottrell: Obviously.

 

Joel Davis: And so that could be a good opportunity for us. But like there’s going to be times where, like racism is valuable for many reasons. Like they obviously allowed people like us to run amok on the site in the lead up to the last American election because they’re trying to get Trump in and they knew that the more swastikas and sunrads that were posted on Twitter, there’d be more votes for Trump with young people and it worked. So they try to channel racism for their own ends. It’s the most powerful force in politics. So it doesn’t surprise me at all!

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s the most powerful force in the world. Racism. Racism is kind of the precondition for the development of all living things, isn’t it? It’s like woven into nature that surrounds us. Like, racism is probably the most foundational reality of this physical plane where we live. It’s the basis for all life. You don’t see any magpies running around pursuing crows because they want to be more diverse. But yeah, I can understand that. Racism is obvious, obviously leverage, but it’s done in a smart way.

 

I don’t like to believe that I’m just playing into the agenda of American, you know, political brains, though. I mean, all I was doing essentially on X was, I suppose, supporting and trying to legitimize. I mean, I’m part of an agenda as well. I’m part of a political agenda. It’s quite obvious the agenda I’m part of I like to think that I’m part of a good agenda. I’m trying to popularise and legitimize the White Australia movement. Right. I believe that there’s nothing wrong with being a White Australian.

 

And I think that could become a popular talking point in the future, especially when White Australians start becoming a minority or when things get so bad that you can’t go down to a shopping centre without potentially being raped or stabbed by a coloured migrant from Africa. Already we’re dawning on that reality now.

 

So the agenda I’m part of, because I’m part of it. I’m not directly linked in, I’m not an active member, but because I’m someone with a voice people listen to and I was creating content to try to translate what you guys were doing for the ordinary viewer. Well, that’s enough reason for me to also be taken out with the rest of the guys in censorship. You know, it’s frustrating because you know what? I won’t get into it. I’m not going to sook about censorship because if I was in control, I’d be censoring my enemies as well, straight up. I wouldn’t be giving people ideas.

 

Joel Davis: Need to figure out how to adapt. That’s why it’s important that people clip and re-upload the show, for example, and re-upload stuff that we post. When Blair posts a video on Telegram or whatever, re-upload it on other sites, enable our voice to keep getting out there regardless. That’s invaluable to circumvent the censorship that we’re under.

 

But also we just have to adapt. I think building the political party will give us strong standing to get back on a lot of these sites and to normalise ourselves in.

 

Blair Cottrell: The thing that irritates me most about it is just the whole concept of democracy. I would be more satisfied with this whole ordeal if the Australian government, the people within Australian government just came out and said:

 

“Hey, we’re not allowing these opinions. We’re censoring certain opinions. We’re banning certain political ideologies. This is not a democracy anymore!”

 

I’ll be like, okay, at least I know where I stand. But they keep parroting bullshit and trying to present themselves as something that they’re not. You know, that they stand for these democratic principles that they don’t stand for. So they just lie to your face. While in reality there’s like counterinsurgency departments that exist purely to harass and censor political dissidents in this Australian democracy. And that’s what frustrates me so much, because you do your best to obey the law. You do your best to hold to the principles that you were raised to believe in the principles of being fair, diplomatic, you know, principle of free speech, not being violent, all that kind of stuff. You observe all of those rules, social boundaries and laws, and you still just don’t get any rights. It’s like you still just get censored, harassed, de-banked, followed. You get police knocking on your door, asking you about the political party you might be joining in the future. You know, it’s just a complete Police State down here in Australia.

 

And so it just pisses me off that they can’t just admit that that’s what they are. I suppose Chris Minns is the one who’s come closest to actually admitting it. The premier of New South Wales, he said that, hey, we can’t basically, can’t have free speech in this multicultural paradise because it might hurt feelings, and we can’t have that. So free speech is cancelled. He didn’t say it exactly like that, but that’s basically what he believes. I can respect that more than what some of those other assholes passing themselves off as politicians, whatever people’s representatives are actually presenting themselves. As actually still pretend that they’re living in some sort of democracy or are members of a democracy. There’s nothing Democratic about Australia. I don’t know. Do you agree, Joel? What do you think?

 

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, they pretend that we live in a liberal democracy.

 

[53:22]

 

Blair Cottrell: Before you chime in, sorry, I know I just passed it to you and I’m starting again. The real test will be whether or not you guys can actually register your political party and participate in this so-called democracy. You know, that’s going to be the real, the big reveal as to how free and Democratic this so-called Australian democracy is because I’ve got a feeling they’re not going to let you do it.

 

But with Chris Minns right now, I brought up Chris Minns, he’s under a bit of fire right now, isn’t he? Because his staffers have been called to account for their role in imposing new Hate Speech laws. Basically tampering with Australian law to make it more difficult to criticise jewish people. Changing vilification laws specifically I think all on the back of the caravan hoax.

 

But now his staffers actually refuse to show up to the initial inquiry, which they’ve got to show up to it I think if they’re summoned.

 

So the arrogance of Chris Minns’ office, the staffers in Chris Minns’ office has led to what I think might be potential arrests. What’s going on with that, Joel? Have Chris Minns’ staff has been arrested or are they going to be arrested? Do they have to come to court? What’s the next step there?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so what happened is that the, we talked about it on the show last week that there was the Legislative Council which is like the Upper House of the state government, they are doing an inquiry, an official inquiry into what happened because obviously the day that they’re passing these laws it’s coming out that this thing is a hoax and they’re ramming them through anyway. And we talked about it at the time.

 

Not only was it a hoax, it was literally paid for by foreign state actors, almost definitely Israel basically paying bikies to conduct false flag anti-semitic terrorist attacks to create a pretext to change laws to make it illegal to criticise jews or make it illegal for White people to criticise any minority groups basically in Australia.

 

Anyway, the role that Chris Minns’ staff has played is being subject to the inquiry because they’re alleging that they knew about it well ahead of time and deliberately concealed the fact that it was a hoax in order to ram this stuff through and only allowed it to kind of come to the surface after that successfully secured a passage through the state like the Legislative Council. Now it’s kind of become interesting because basically they subpoenaed them. They said you got to come and answer our questions. They refused to show up. They all refused to show up.

 

Blair Cottrell: So now it literally didn’t show up. They didn’t refuse. They didn’t write ahead and say:

 

“Hey, we’re not coming!”

 

They just didn’t even answer. There was just empty seats on the day.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And they’re still refusing to show up. So why, if they’ve got nothing to hide, why can’t they show up? Why can’t the members elected by the people ask them some questions about what they were doing? What are they trying to hide? Obviously something.

 

Blair Cottrell: And you know, Chris Minns was interviewed about it recently and he said:

 

“Disappointing, concerning and massive overreach for his staffers to have to actually explain why they tampered with Australian law on the back of a hoax.”

 

It’s disappointing, concerning and massive overreach to be held accountable for changing Australian laws on the back of a hoax. That’s what he said. Not word for word, but that’s what he was alluding to in an interview with a journalist. Imagine that. Imagine believing that you’re free from any accountability, that you can just pass laws based on lies and hoaxes behind the back of the Australian people.

 

And then when you’re held to account for it, oh, you’re a victim. This is massive overreach. This is disappointing. How dare you ask me to be to answer your questions. That was Chris Minns’ reaction and he’s been having a dig at Mark Latham too. I saw in a recent clip. Why is that? What role is Mark Latham played?

 

Joel Davis: So, yeah, I’ll get to that.

 

The bottom line is that they have no respect for law. Like legally they have to show up and answer questions if they’ve been subpoenaed. And they technically within the power to issue arrest warrants. They haven’t been issued yet. I think these things are being stalled because of the political connections between Chris Minns and the people that are ultimately responsible for issuing the warrants or not so Chris Minns is basically just trying to shut it down through favours and back room deals and so on. So we’ll see if that’s successful.

 

But yeah, the Liberal Party in New South Wales, they refused because initially guys like Mark Latham and some of the other Right-wing minor party members in New South Wales, they tried to push a motion to repeal the laws entirely in light of the revelations. The Liberal Party refused to help them do that. But the Liberal Party then agreed to doing an inquiry because Liberal Party knew it would create a shitstorm for Labor. Like what is happening now, which would be good for them in the polls but obviously they’re in the pocket of the jews. They don’t want to actually repeal the laws. It’s a typical Liberal Party where they pretend to be on our side but really complicit.

 

[59:01]

 

But anyway, obviously Mark Latham is Independent. He was on the One Nation ticket. He got kicked out of One Nation for rampant homophobia, for basically. Which was quite funny. Remember we talked about it at the time on the show like two years ago when yeah. He quite graphically described how disgusting anal sex is in response to some homosexual politician that criticised him.

 

So anyway, Mark Latham, he hates poofters. He’s increasingly seeming to hate jews. Well not really but you know he did call out the jewish lobby. He said that Chris Minns was emboldening the jewish lobby, that the jewish lobby has too much power and so on. And Latham is one of the front men of this inquiry along with the other Right-wing minor party legislative councilmen who are trying to hold the government to account.

 

And so it’s a bit of political theatre. Chris Minns is accusing Mark Latham of advancing nefarious anti-semitic conspiracy theories and so on. And Mark Latham responded on Twitter this evening to a clip of that posted by Australians versus the Agenda declaring:

 

“Chris Minns is his bitch!”

 

So that was quite funny. I guess he’s out for blood. He’s trying to take Mins down. He sees this as a political opportunity to take the hatchet to the knee of Minns and his government.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, now’s the time to put the pressure on. Minns needs to be exposed. He needs to be embarrassed.

 

Anyway, anyone can put the pressure on him now, they should do it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, absolutely! And at Mark Latham he recently got lost a court case for damages against this homosexual. I think he was from the Greens, Alex Greenwich, I think he was the member for Sydney. So he was voted in by all the Oxford street faggots into that position, I presume. Yeah, a judgement was held that he has to pay him half a million dollars in damages for just simply stating that anal sex is disgusting! What the fuck kind of country do we live in where it costs half a million dollars to offend a homosexual by declaring anal sex is disgusting!

 

So I think Mark Latham has a bit of a kind of punished aura at the moment. You know, 20 years ago he was the head of the Labor Party. He almost became prime minister. Now he’s getting tossed out of One Nation for being a homophobe and, basically getting bankrupted by the system.

 

And so what has he got left to lose? He might as well take on the jews. He might as well do some damage to the ruling elite while he’s still got a position. So good on him. I think it’s funny. Mark Latham defended The Noticer when they did a notice, a hit piece saying that Notice The Noticer is a neo-Nazi psyop, basically. And, yeah, he’s kind of flirted more with, like our guys on Twitter. Mark Latham’s a bit of a cuck on race, or more than a bit of a cuck. He’s a cuck on race. He’s not a true nationalist, but he does seem like he’s somewhat of a real human being.

 

And it seems like he kind of tried to be an establishment politician and kind of was chewed up and spat out through a long [word unclear]

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe the reason Latham’s not an ethnic nationalist is because he spent all his time around White Parliamentarians and he just can’t stand you know, [chuckling] so it’s pretty hard to believe in your own race when that’s the extent of the experience that you’ve had with your own race is White Parliamentarians. I don’t envy his kind of company. There’s another way. Latham, if you’re watching this, there’s another way. It doesn’t have to be Parliament.

 

Joel Davis: Well, actually, I’ve seen Mark Latham Fed post on Twitter when he’s had a few beers. He’s basically said:

 

“We need a revolution to overthrow a corrupt ruling establishment.”

 

And so on.

 

Blair Cottrell: So he must be there. He must be almost there!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it does seem, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It takes some of us longer to get there, but there’s no shame in that.

 

Joel Davis: It does seem like Mark Latham is, yeah, he’s kind of become alienated. He tried to do it all the right way, supposedly according to the rules of the old paradigm. He was a true believer in social democracy or whatever.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what happens! That’s exactly what I was talking about before.

 

Joel Davis: Now he’s a jaded, old goat.

 

Blair Cottrell: He would be sort of feeling the same frustration that I feel I suppose where you’ve been raised to adhere to these principles, you do adhere to them.

 

But then the same people who kind of claim to uphold those principles and stand for those principles, they just chew you up and spit you out through all sorts of underhanded tactics. He called me once when I was at the height of my activism, because he had a show I can’t remember what it was called. You might remember he had like a podcast or something going on.

 

I can’t remember what it was called. But I was just working on a job site I think in Eltham. He rings me and he goes:

 

“Blair?”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Yes.”

 

And he goes:

 

“Mark Latham.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“G’ day mate, how can I help you?”

 

And he goes:

 

“Yeah, do you want to come on the show?”

 

I said:

 

“What show is that?”

 

And he said:

 

“My show.”

 

 

And I’m just like:

 

“Can I call you back? I’m just in the middle of something.”

 

Because I was on a scaffold like trying to repair this eaves that was like hanging past the scaffold and like I was kind of balancing. But he seemed to get offended. He’s just like:

 

“Yeah, right.”

 

And he just hung up on me. Then I tried to call him back and he didn’t answer. I don’t know, maybe he’s having a bad day. But that’s the extent of the interaction that I’ve had with Mark Latham. He’s got grumpy bad energy. He’s got the grumpy old bad energy he does.

 

[1:05:03]

 

Joel Davis: But he’s kind of like one of the few politicians that actually has like red blood in his veins. The only time I was in, I never spoke to him one on one, but anything resembling a conversational context was him just ranting at a conference I attended a few years ago, ranting about how Julia Gillard was a lesbian, how her so-called husband is a beard, that he’s a homosexual himself and that faggots have taken over Australian politics and lamenting this fact, which was quite humourous.

 

But what Latham tweeted last week that kind of provoked things was him saying two jews on Sky News saying, quote:

 

“The fake anti-semitism narrative must stop. Might be better to stop legislating when New South Wales police say none of those arrested have anti-semitic ideology. It was a con job set up by mobsters. Minns emboldened the jewish lobby and now it’s out of control.”

 

So we’re seeing Australian politicians call out the jews probably for the first time I can remember in my lifetime having multiple Australian politicians call out the jews directly. It does feel like a bit of a sea change. John Lawson posted a picture of Mark Latham standing over John Howard and aggressing with his hands and like getting in his face. And Latham’s replying to that, he’s replying to other nationalists. Someone said:

 

“Wait a minute, is New South Wales politics actually getting interesting for a change?”

 

And he said:

 

“We ride to the sound of the guns!”

 

So Latham’s on the war path. He doesn’t give a fuck anymore! It’s pretty funny. Funny thing, these old politicians that got chewed up and spat out by the major parties kind of like turn. And it’s the smartest politicians. I think Mark Latham and Gerard Rennick are the two highest IQ politicians in Australia and they’re the two that are calling out the jews. So what does that say?

 

Blair Cottrell: They might, Rennick and Latham might want to read the chapter of Mein Kampf where Hitler explains what happens to someone with real ability who goes into Parliament. Not just someone with real ability, but someone who genuinely holds to principles, who wants to stand up for their country. You should read what Hitler has to say about people like that that go into Parliament and how Parliament just basically becomes a mob to destroy them and get them out. Because in order to survive in Parliament, you need to be a rat without principles! You go into Parliament with principles, they all basically unite against you to get you out. That’s essentially what he says, but he says it much more articulately, he writes it much more articulately than that you can read it for yourself if you want.

 

Joel Davis: But I love, though, how there’s this emerging kind of renegade like cast in Australian politics, which was previously quite boring and monotonous. We don’t agree with them on everything, but people like Latham, people like Ralph Babet and a few of these other guys that are kind of at least causing problems for the system, and that’s kind of our aspiration, I guess in politics is to kind of join the team and push things even harder and faster and further. The kind of outsider team of Right-wing disturbers and chaos agents, just going Joker mode.

 

And I think Aussies love that kind of thing. Aussies love an underdog, Aussie’s love sticking it to the man, all that type of thing. So I think that would actually make politics interesting to have a kind of cast of colourful characters, you know, engaging in that more in the years going ahead. And I think that’s probably what we should aim for on the Right-wing of politics is to develop that because that could be the kind of catalyst for meaningful change.

 

Because as I said, as the reason why I was talking about international politics earlier is World War III is on the horizon. It might not be next week, but it is on the horizon. And when that moment arrives, all bets are off. It’s going to be a total reset of politics. And after World War III is over, is everyone going to be focused on World War II anymore? I don’t think so. there’s going to be a whole new World War for everyone, for the whole world order to be rebuilt around. And the animating myth is going to be all the horrible things that the chinks did to us and so on, rather than how bad the Holocaust was. It’s going to be a total reset of the collective psyche.

 

Blair Cottrell: We are in post World War II fairy tale land, aren’t we?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but it’s time’s almost up. Like there’s almost no one alive that remembers World War II at this point.

 

And by the time World War III is over, there’ll be barely anyone alive who remembers it, but everyone will be remembering what just happened. And what would have just happened is a race war against the Chinese, from our perspective. We’ve got 1.7 million chinks in our country. They’re all going to have to be put in camps or something worse. They’re not going to be able to be trustworthy members of Australian society anymore. There’s going to be a division by race. I think it’s going to be a total reset of our collective values. We’re going to pretend that men and women are totally equivalent at wartime when we actually have to go boots on the ground in the hundreds of thousands and fight to the death? I don’t think so. I think everyone’s going to come back to reality. They’re going to have to, they’re going to have no choice.

 

[1:10:34]

 

And so this confrontation with reality is coming.

 

And so our job is at the moment is to try and get ready for that. Because a lot of people are black pilled because they think that the current paradigm, this kind of monotonous slow grind is just going to continue on ad infinitum forever. Nothing’s ever going to happen, nothing’s ever going to change and we’re all just going to go out with a wimper. That’s not how history works. That’s not what’s going to happen. There’s going to be a major crisis. Everything is going to get blown up and remade. All of our values are going to get reset in the coming generations. And the work that we’re doing now is setting the table for that next generation to eat. Like we’re getting things ready for the paradigm shift which is on the horizon.

 

So people need to think like that if we have a movement established, even if it’s just tens of thousands or 100,000 men and we’re only getting a certain percentage of the vote and we have one or two guys elected or something, we’re going to at least be in a position to make the most of the coming crises, to grow and gain influence and gain a seat at the table. We want to have a seat at the table at World War 3 from the Australian political perspective. We want to have a seat at the table because in order to conduct World War 3, as we said before, what’s the most powerful force in politics? Right? Racism! That’s the main force you’re going to be able to channel in the Australian people to get them to fucking fight. And we are the arbiters of racism in our country. We are the vanguard!

 

So we’re going to take on a very different role in our society from just being these hated, despised, controversial outsiders. We’re going to end up becoming, we’re going to have a completely different relevance in society in the coming decades.

 

So we have to get ready, we have to get building and time is running out. We need to get serious. The next few years, it’s indeterminate, when all hell is going to break loose. But it’s going to happen soon.

 

So yeah, and the Anthony Albanese’s of the world are going to get wiped away. They’re not going to survive. We’re not going to be electing gay nerds into office after World War III. It’s going to call for a completely different kind of politician politics in general. The whole social attitude will change. The men who come back from World War III are going to come back embittered, but also entitled. They just went and fought to the death for the future of their nation. Are they going to come back and just allow it to be fucking given away to women in pants suits and fucking Indians? I don’t fucking think. So I don’t.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think when all of that comes about, you’re a little bit frozen up, by the way, I can hear you fine, but your camera is just all frozen up. And it’s not just for me because I’m noticing someone in the comments mentioned it too. But watch all the other races in Australia and probably throughout other Western countries, watch them all suddenly be on their best behaviour when that situation with China that probably will turn into a new World War eventually comes around, because suddenly White people will begin to become more conscious of the fact that they are White and that they have their own ethnic interests at stake. And outsiders are going to become easier to recognise. Because with that basic introduction of the anti-Chinese racism that you say will become kind of a central feature of life during that time, you know, naturally we’re going to start recognizing other people who aren’t like us as well more easily.

 

And all of those arrogant Indians that are currently boasting about taking over certain regions in our country, all the Africans who are on home invasion sprees and murdering doctors in the hills, happened just last year. A young 17 year old was just convicted of that a couple of days ago in Melbourne. All of these people, I think will suddenly be on their best behaviour, and it’s going to be an interesting shift, interesting change.

 

I’m not overly excited about anti-semitism being a mainstream thing again because I know that that’s how things pretty much always were throughout the history of Europe, at least before the Second World War, leading up to the Second World War. Basically every country was anti-semitic as a general rule. I mean, Christians just generally understood that jewish people weren’t to be trusted. There was an understanding that jewish people weren’t generally friendly to Christians. I think that was mostly prevalent throughout Europe. And I’m sure there were times in some countries where that consensus, that understanding kind of became less prevalent and then something would happen and people would realise the reality of the situation again, because you’ve got times where kings in England, for example, like oh, now the jews are okay. And then 15 years later they’re kicking the jews out again. But the jews know how to live. They would have necessary, or how should I put it? They would have essential blood memories. So they know how to survive in environments where anti-semitism is rife. So I wouldn’t get too excited about it.

 

But it is exciting to consider what the world would look like, what Australia would look like if White people redeveloped a bit of ethnic consciousness. That’s what I’m trying to say, in essence. And that’s really all that I want to see in my lifetime.

 

I mean, I don’t really want for much. I would just like to die having seen a country filled with my own people who know who they are and know who their enemy is, who are able to recognise outsiders and threats. So I feel like I’ve died having served some sort of purpose, you know.

 

[1:16:14]

 

Joel Davis: Sure. I think for Americans the jewish issue is more central because that’s the kind of centre of jewish power in the world is the United States. And they exercise a lot more influence over American political and cultural life.

 

Blair Cottrell: That Zionist, that Judeo-Christian mythology, whatever you want to call it’s kind of popular in America, isn’t it? Maybe not so much as it was 10 years ago, but there’s still that, yeah, God’s chosen people thing going on.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, obviously there’s that. But even beyond that, just jews occupy a very prominent role in American life. Like, even though they’re like 3% of the population, they’re massively over-represented in media.

 

So if you’re watching podcasts, like there was the Leather Apron Club videos where he went through all the big podcasts, like all the big political podcasts, Tim pool, Joe Rogan, etc, etc. And he was going through them all and it was like a third plus of the guests on all these podcasts were jewish. Even though they’re only 3% of the population, they’re over-represented in the kind of tastemaking culture setting domains.

 

And so they have an outsized influence on American culture and political life, not to mention all the money that they’re putting in. And this is true on the Left-wing and the Right. It’s not just like the religious Zionists or whatever. Jews are more influential probably on the Left than on the Right in America in many ways, because just of how the majority of them are Leftists in the United States.

 

So that’s a big deal for Americans. And also primarily it’s the American military that’s getting dragged in to fight Zionist wars and so on. Like, we get kind of dragged along, but it’s kind of a secondary thing for us. It’s more primary for them. So it’s a more prominent issue for them.

 

But the reason why we did The jews Hate Freedom protest before Christmas last year, it wasn’t just because of the topical nature of that issue, which obviously it was primarily about, but it was because I think that’s the best way to frame the jewish problem to Australians in the current year, which is what is the jewish lobby primarily pushing for in Australia? The main thing that it’s pushing for always is hate speech legislation. And more and more attacks on our freedom of speech. Every single time anything happens, jews come out into the media and demand more arrests, more laws passed and so on. They want to shut us down. And Australians value freedom, and so they don’t appreciate this small minority trying to take away the freedoms of the rest of us because of their own hysteria and their own lack of ability to take criticism.

 

So I think that’s the strong frame and I think it’s a strong frame for Americans as well, I mean, there’s jews clamouring in the United States to take away their freedoms as well. And there’s nothing, there’s probably no value that Americans hold more dear than liberty.

 

So the kind of jews versus freedom framing I think is the best framing. You know, last week I criticised Sam Hyde for going on a podcast and trying to frame the problem with jews as:

 

“Well, look at the genocide that they’re doing in Palestine. Do you want to pay for that with your tax dollars?”

 

And it’s like, that’s probably convincing to like Leftists who sympathize with browns. But like, we should be talking about what jews are doing to us! Like how we are negatively affected by jewish institutional behaviour, not other groups. You know, who gives a shit about Palestinians ultimately, other than bleeding Leftists, not that many people or like Muslims, but like, who does the average patriotic White Australian care about themselves? Ourselves. So it needs to be framed in those terms. And you know, a lot of the problems that are occurring in Australia, they don’t boil down to jews. Like the problems with mass immigration and so on. Jews have played a leading role in advancing mass immigration and multiculturalism and so on. But it’s not just the jews.

 

Like, it’s a coalition of different groups, whether it be the housing industry, whether it be ideological Leftists and globalists, whether it be other, like non-White minority groups in their lobbying efforts or voting blocs or whatever. There’s a coalescence of anti-White forces in our society.

 

But on the issue of free speech, jews are playing a massively outsized and prominent role in attacking it. So on the one hand they try to portray themselves as:

 

“Oh, but you know, Israel’s a free liberal democracy. And if you oppose Israel, you’re allying yourself with these communists and Muslims who hate freedom and liberalism.”

 

And so you’re like some backwards, you know, fascist or something. That’s how they frame things. But it’s ridiculous! That’s such a weak frame. We need to smash through that framework and say:

 

“No, we’re on the side of freedom. You’re on the side of tyranny!”

 

If you’re not doing anything wrong, if the jewish role in society isn’t a problem, if what Israel’s doing isn’t a problem, why can’t we talk about it? Why can’t you just sit down and debate it and defend your position openly?

 

Blair Cottrell: Don’t you care about the Holocaust, Joel?

 

So what you’re saying in essence is anti-semitism is equivalent to the highest knowledge.

 

Joel Davis: What do you mean by that?

 

[1:21:49]

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m sort of like borrowing a Christian. I don’t know if it’s a Christian phrase or it’s actually from the Bible, says:

 

“Fear of God is equivalent to the highest knowledge.”

 

It’s true in religion maybe, but in politics anti-semitism is equivalent to the highest knowledge. You would think that you go into life thinking that any kind of prejudice any kind of stereotyping a person is just prejudice. And you’re not going to give yourself to that kind of brutal nature of thought.

 

But then the more you actually pay attention, you realise there’s a good reason for stereotypes, ethnic stereotypes in particular, and that there’s anti-semitism for a reason. It’s not just because people are idiots. It’s because people have observed the reality of a nature of a certain group of people for a very long time. [chuckling] It’s like that people continue to engage in certain practices, continue to behave in a certain way which leads other people to be somewhat hostile to them for their own purposes, which is usually a natural response.

 

So I think in summary, you could say that anti-semitism is the result of a lot of acquired knowledge. It’s not just some knee jerk reaction springing from prejudice or bigotry, as they try to frame it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the problems associated with the jewish community and its influence over our society, it actually requires like careful study and analysis. It’s not something which is like directly evident. I think people who have a more superficial view of society, they tend to not have very strong opinions on jews. They’ll be more upset at other groups that are more prominent and public facing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you hear? Well, that’s the point, isn’t it? That’s probably one of the reason the jewish people aren’t so prominent and public facing.

 

Joel Davis: I think a we’ve talked about on the show before. I think it’s a big mistake for them. They’re shooting themselves in the foot. They should shut up and retreat into the background. If they truly aren’t doing anything wrong, shut up and retreat into the background and allow us to have our race war with the Indians and the Chinese and the Muslims and all these other groups and retreat into the background and pretend to be on whichever side is winning, you know. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: I do like the way like the standard jewish merchant that I’ve had dealings with in construction in the past. I do like the way they don’t flaunt their wealth. It’s one thing that the standard average jewish character from the southeast region of Melbourne, like Malvern, Elston, Wick regions, you would never know that they were wealthy. But they do tend to have access to a great deal of wealth. Like they’ll own big car parks in the city, high rise hotel buildings or family members of theirs will own that stuff and they’ll have shares in it kind of thing. But they’ll drive the kind of cars, they’ll drive a Camry and they’ll be wearing tracksuit pants and a T-shirt from Kmart or just some button up polo from Kmart. You know, they’re unshaven sometimes you don’t, you would never know. These are the way a lot of the jewish merchants around Melbourne operate, operate. And I kind of admire that because it at least is an expression of ego control to some extent.

 

Because when you think about it, the people who wear the big fat watches and lots of jewelry and drive around in like $200,000 Maseratis, what’s the point of that? What is the point in flaunting your wealth? What’s the point in wasting money on that shit in the first place? Like, what are you actually trying to achieve? Like:

 

“Look at me, I’m really rich and special!”

 

Isn’t that just ego fragility? Just that you’re trying to draw attention to yourself.

 

Joel Davis: So if you’re a billionaire Blair, you’re telling me you wouldn’t buy a fast car?

 

Blair Cottrell: I definitely wouldn’t. I would buy a nice Tiguan. I would buy a very nice Volkswagen Tiguan, because they’re a good reliable car and I would like a nice new, new sort of updated.

 

Joel Davis: I’d buy an Aston Martin. I’d buy an Aston Martin.

 

Blair Cottrell: You don’t want to be driving around in a car like that in the current climate though. You’re just going to, it’s probably just going to get stolen by Africans. I’m not saying that you shouldn’t buy nice things because they’ll be stolen by Africans.

 

What I’m saying is, …

 

Joel Davis: Put it in the garage! How they’re going to get?

 

Blair Cottrell: But why do you need it? Like this is what I’m talking about.

 

Joel Davis: I want to do 240km an hour down the highway!

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, but when are you going to do that? In the middle of the night when the coppers aren’t going to catch you.

 

Joel Davis: I’m doing 240. Good luck catching me. Plus, I got enough money to pay the tickets if I’m a billionaire.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right, [chuckling] but you’re gonna get sick of that eventually. I mean, okay, that’s a hobby. You’re talking about a hobby, but I’m talking about why would you, like, walk around in lots of gold chains, jewelry, …

 

Joel Davis: I wouldn’t walk around in gold chains.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like express your wealth? Like, what’s the point?

 

Joel Davis: I just would like to drive a ridiculously fast car, ridiculously fast. Because it’s fun.

 

Blair Cottrell: I get it. But again, we’re just talking about hobbies. If you had a lot of money, you wouldn’t. If you had a lot of, …

 

Joel Davis: I think jews are too neurotic, like:

 

“Oh, I’m gonna crash!”

 

Like, they wouldn’t even have the balls to go 240, you know?

 

[1:27:32]

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I gotta admit, I don’t know. I mean, what’s the point in driving 240 or just for the thrill rush. Man! What I’m saying though, is I think the jews, not all of them, obviously, but the majority of them, they must be raised this way. Or maybe it’s just part of their genetic nature. They do seem to have good outward ego control where they don’t flaunt their wealth.

 

But it’s probably all part of their subversive demeanour. Right? So you don’t really expect much from them. It is very true that you never really expect much from jewish people. When you deal with them on an individual basis, they always seem kind of nervous and skittish and you kind of feel sorry for them. That’s the impact they’ve always had on me. You kind of feel sorry for them and so you’re extra nice to them, because this is long before I ever really knew what I knew about jews. So I do admire that one element of their disposition, which is they don’t tip, they don’t tend to flaunt their wealth. And they’re some of the wealthiest people you’ll ever work with or for, if you’re in whatever industry that you’re in where you might come across them.

 

Joel Davis: I think the main thing to admire about them is that they invest a lot of their wealth in the advancement of their community rather than just the advancement of themselves as individuals.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s true.

 

Joel Davis: There are a lot of Anglo millionaires and billionaires, like multi, multi-millionaires and billionaires in this country who don’t put one single dollar into the advancement of White Australia, which is why the country is being stolen from us!

 

The jews are 0.4% of the population and their lobby is so aggressive and powerful because they pay for it. They put their community first as a group. And you know, meanwhile a lot of our richest people are fundamentally making money off our replacement. Maybe they’re working in industries that benefit from cheap non-White labour or if they’re in housing construction, they’re benefiting from mass immigration or whatever.

 

Blair Cottrell: And it makes your eye roll thinking about your parents, doesn’t it? I mean, I love my parents, but the standard sort of White Boomer parents, all they really think about is their retirement, is retiring comfortably and spending all the money or wealth that they’ve generated throughout their lifetime on themselves at the end of their lives. Which people watching this might think, good on them.

 

I mean, that’s the phrase they use in Australia:

 

“Oh, good on them. They should be able to do that. They’ve worked hard their whole lives!”

 

Yeah, I get it.

 

But when you contrast that kind of decision making process with what the jews are doing, with what the Chinese are doing, with what pretty much every other race in this country are doing, it’s kind of retarded to just blow all the wealth that you have generated through your working life on yourself and Martinis and cruises and fine dining before you die while your children have to inherit the mess that you fucking leave behind! I mean, you got to admit that’s pretty retarded, right.

 

I think being a bit more collectivist and having a little bit more foresight, generational foresight with the money that you make in your life, if you’re a Boomer, might serve your nation to some extent.

 

And that’s right, someone says in the comments:

 

“They taught our people to think as individuals.”

 

That’s the problem. And the Boomers can be really bad for that. Like I’m not an anti-boomer sort of guy. I’m a bit of a Boomer appreciater it in a lot of ways, because they do work really hard. They’re an industrious people. They’re always trying to fix things. They don’t like to relax, they’re always working. But they’ve definitely been geared to think on individual basis and that’s why all they seem to care about is their retirement.

 

Joel Davis: The Strausshowe generational theory predicts that Boomers and Gen-X’s will be more individualistic because Boomers grew up at a time of great prosperity. They grew up at the time after World War II, where you know, society was on high, institutions were working incredibly well. There were incredible opportunities. They’re highly idealistic generation that challenged spiritually the values of the old order because there was no crisis for them to really, like, confront in their lifetime. So their politics or their cultural involvement primarily became one of spiritual dissatisfaction.

 

Then you have the Gen-X’s who are like more jaded individualists, where the Boomers are idealistic individualists who want freedom and liberation and all this kind of stuff. And so they’re very focused on how they can enjoy their retirement and waste all their money on garbage rather than thinking about legacy.

 

Gen-X’s raised with very careless parents. There they were raised as kind of like a forgotten generation. They’re incredibly nihilistic and cynical because they were raised after the Boomers who had this great idealistic project that totally failed, and they perceived that. So Gen-X’s think it’s all bullshit! There’s nothing you can do to change the system. Just, you know, advance yourself as an individual as much as possible. Just make money and do what you got to do. There’s no higher purpose or meaning to society or life.

 

And so these are the two generations that are kind of running the show at the moment because they’re the ones with the wealth and the power and the influence. And they’re very individualistic for two kind of different reasons in terms of polarity.

 

But what the this generational theory predicts is that for Millennials, that we’re actually, … And by Millennials, they. Their cut-off point for Millennials is later than what’s most commonly understood. So older Zoomers are included in this.

 

[1:33:20]

 

Basically, if you’re an adult now, if you’re at least over the age of 21, you kind of fall in this category. For our generation, we’re a lot more collectivist because we were raised at a time of decline. Society has been declining. The generation that came before us were nihilistic. They didn’t really believe in anything.

 

And so we’re not really kind of reacting to a false idealism. Instead, we’re responding to a kind of society of excessive individualism, excessive nihilism, and instead have a kind of inclination to form for collective solutions rather than individualistic solutions. So where, like Gen-Xers say:

 

“Oh, well, you got no chance in changing the system. Just try and make money and be successful as an individual.”

 

Millennials tend to be more supportive of collective political solutions to our problems and say:

 

“Well, how can I as an individual succeed in a system like this?”

 

And so Millennials are far more predisposed to socialist economic policies, for example, and more collectivist political ideologies, whether it be on the Left or the Right, than previous generations.

 

So as we kind of ascend and become take over the system in the coming generational cycle, because we’ll become the older people that are actually in charge of the government and in charge of everything, basically, our values will start to get imposed on society and society will move in that direction.

 

So that’s another reason why I think the future of the Australian Right-wing is not going to be talking, it’s not going to be promoting conservative libertarian style policies around:

 

“We’ve got to cut taxes and we’ve got to reduce the national debt and people need to work harder!”

 

And all this kind of stuff. What’s going to motivate Millennials in the political space is redistributing wealth to our generation, giving us free stuff, giving us basically making up for the fact that wealth has been hoarded into the other generations, making up and kind of restructuring the economy. Collective solutions to individual problems rather than individual solutions to collective problems, which is predominant within Generation X. Like, Generation X thought that Fight Club was like the coolest movie ever, because Fight Club was all like:

 

“Society sucks, man! Let’s just go and like punch on in a garage and like blow buildings up and like have sex that’ll be awesome and get drunk.”

 

Whereas, like, they thought Nirvana was like the greatest band ever because they were like:

 

“Everything sucks!”

 

And they’re like:

 

“Whoa, that’s so deep!”

 

Whereas, like, Millennials are like, they don’t resonate with that kind of thing. Instead, Millennials are interested in, as I said, idealistic collective solutions, like, who is responsible on the collective level? How can we solve it on the collective level? Which makes sense why nationalism would resurge and socialism would resurge simultaneously within our generation.

 

So the future of Right-wing politics is a kind of nationalist Right-wing socialism. It’s not going to be small government, it’s not going to be doubling down individualism. Everyone is sick of individualism. Young people don’t want individualism. Young people don’t want to be told:

 

“Pull yourself up by your bootstraps, go talk to her!”

 

And all that kind of advice:

 

“Get it done!”

 

Blair Cottrell: The problem with individualism is you get too much of yourself under some sort of individualism or individualistic thought process system. You get too much of yourself and you get bored with it. You know we’ve had individualism, and look where it’s led individuals. Everyone’s on a plethora of script meds, sitting at home watching Netflix by themselves, paying off a mortgage by themselves, and just living in there in their honeycomb cell.

 

But I’ve got to bounce, man! I’ve got to bounce because I’ve got a really early start. I’ve got to get to bed.

 

Joel Davis: Can we do our four Superchats?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, if we’ve only got four, that’s fine. Yeah. Sorry, guys, if I’m sort of ending it abruptly, but I’m worried I won’t sleep tonight. And if I don’t sleep, I’m gonna have a really hard time tomorrow. I’ve got a bit of traveling to do tomorrow.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I was gonna get you to react to that Indian video, but fuck it! We’ll do it another time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I already watched it. The guy on your channel saying that:

 

“Hey, we’re taking over everything and we’re gonna marry your sons and daughters.”

 

Or something like that.

 

Basically, he was almost boasting that he was going to end up with like, all the Indians are going to get everyone’s sloppy seconds:

 

“You’re all going to get divorced, and then your divorced wives are going to get with us!”

 

He goes:

 

“Every Indian guy I know is with someone who’s not Indian!”

 

And I’m thinking, that’s not my experience. Every Indian I know is with an Indian. Well, it’s usually Indian men walking around in-groups looking for some girl to sexually assault. [chuckling]

 

But, yeah, it’s just your take on it that you posted on Telegram was perfect when you said that basically, what the guy is relishing in is the fact that in his mind, White Australians are destined just to end up in the same ethnic situation that he’s in.

 

Joel Davis: Well, you’re downbred into the genetic slop that he is.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was trying to say, in a way, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s his, like, ideal revenge is that:

 

“Oh, yeah, you think we smell and you think we’re disgusting and you think we’re a slave cast of Uber drivers. Well, guess what your grandkids are going to be half Indian Uber drivers, too, and you’re going to be down here in the fucking muck with us!”

 

Blair Cottrell: And there is a real vengeance, there is a real revenge sentiment amongst some of the Indians nowadays, I’ve noticed, isn’t there? Or just people who are responding to any sort of White nationalist talking point on TikTok or something like that you can see in their eyes, hear in their voice and you know, in their words it’s quite obvious that’s like they want vengeance. They want vengeance that they’re not White! They’re irritated that they’re not White! They’re irritated that White people are realizing that they’re White, recognizing the significance of that and starting to talk about it.

 

And all of these people are vengeful as a result! Let’s like, they don’t want that to happen. Obviously, it’s an existential thing. They’re worried they’re going to be sent back to their own countries, maybe.

 

[1:40:00]

 

Joel Davis: I saw a thread on Twitter by this Indian who posted. He said:

 

“Joel Davis, who hates Indians, well, he’s Irish and the Irish aren’t even White!”

 

And he thinks that he, … Anyway, I’m not even Irish, by the way. Full disclosure, I’m Scottish and English mixed together. Yeah, he was saying that apparently I’m Irish and then posted one of these those old like physiognomy charts from like the early 20th century where it showed like how the Irish kind of looked like niggers and being like basically, just like it was funny.

 

But then like, you’re not even White, you’re Irish. It’s like you’re a fucking pajeet. Like, even if I was Irish, you’re a pajeet! Like their main insult is like:

 

“Yeah, well you’re also brown. Like, you’re also a piece of shit! Like we’re both pieces of shit together!”

 

It’s not even like elevating himself up. It’s just dragging you down. It’s like when homosexuals try to like insinuate that you don’t like them because you’re secretly gay. It’s like, would that be insulting? Would me being a homosexual be something that’s disgusting and gross? Well, actually, I agree! It would be disgusting and gross if I was a homosexual. Interesting that you say that.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve said it before. It’s hard to be offended by, it’s probably because you can’t say anything to a White guy to a reasonably well bred White guy, which I imagine. Well, I like to think that you and I are reasonably well bred White men. What can you say to us? Like that’s a racial slur that’s actually going to irritate us. What can you actually say? There’s nothing! What am I going to get offended by? What are you going to call me Casper or pasty or something? Like, okay, I’m fine with that. There’s just nothing that can be said that’s going to like, suddenly make me realise that I belong to an ethnic group that I despise or I’m trying to distract myself from. I’m not trying to distract myself from my ethnic identity. You can only get offended if you’re actually not proud of who you are. If someone’s like using a racial slur, that’s the only reason you could be offended.

 

But yeah, like you said, there’s always just efforts to drag you down with these people. Let’s move on though, because I’m getting to the point where like, I slept three hours last night. I don’t even know how I’m running, like, how I’m still awake for some reason. I’m still going.

 

But yeah, I’m on three hours and I’m only going to get five if I go to bed right now. So we need to get through these Superchats.

 

Joel Davis: Well How’s it Going, said:

 

“Are you guys aware of the Australian band called Black Magic SS? They lean heavy on National Socialist imagery and themes.”

 

I am aware of Black Magic SS. They’re a doom metal outfit. And yeah, I think they’re pretty cool! Have you heard of them?

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. I’ve been to some gigs where bands like that have played. Are they Black Metal? I’m imagining they’re black.

 

Joel Davis: No, no, they’re not Black Metal. They’re like Doom Metal. They sound kind of like imagine if Black Sabbath was less pop sensible and kind of racist. More like mystique.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know if I’ve seen them. I don’t think I have. I’ve seen some Black Metal bands that are into that.

 

Joel Davis: Like, yeah, obviously there’s heaps of NS Black Metal bands, but yeah, no, they’re not Black Metal.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, let’s check them out.

 

Joel Davis: I think they’re Australian too, from memory

 

Blair Cottrell: Wiggle Do sends through $10. Thanks very much. He said:

 

“Lots of people want to be more racist than Hitler in NS circles. Where do you stand on Nuremberg Laws and mixed races? How do you draw the line between White and non-White?”

 

I think Joel’s mentioned this before in previous streams. It would come down to like organisational policy, I think, and different organisations would have different policies on that question. But I’m pretty sure the boys, Joel and the guys have their own policy on that, don’t you?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So it depends on the genetic distance. So like, if you have like trace amounts of like blood black, like African ancestry or Aboriginal ancestry. Less percentage of that can be tolerated relative to if you have like, I don’t know, like trace amounts of like Middle Eastern ancestry or Asiatic kind of ancestries because they’re less genetically different. So it’s dependent on the what the form of blood pollution, what percentage can be allowed. The Nuremberg Laws were primarily just about jews. And in my opinion they were if anything a little bit too lenient. So does that make me more racist than Hitler if I mean I’m Australian?

 

Rigo Weber said:

 

“Does the NSN have monetary incentives for White families to have more children? I think this should be a high priority for the NSN culture to develop, especially to replace all the mass deported.”

 

What do you mean? Do we within our own organisation pay people to breed? No! We don’t pay people to breed within the organisation. We do have so many people from, …

 

[1:45:14]

 

Blair Cottrell: What I can see there’s a lot of encouragement to breed.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Everyone’s having families. The reason why people aren’t having families is not so much about monetary incentives, it’s more about culture. If you have a culture that celebrates motherhood and you’re in a group of friends and associates where motherhood is valued and having children is valued, then the women pick up on that signal and go:

 

“You know what, I want to have kids too. I don’t want to be like some like sterile ageing, you know, wench, surrounded by all these fertile young women with all these babies hanging off their titties, you know, growing the next generation.”

 

So you know, if you develop a pronatalist culture, it kind of flows.

 

But in terms of like government policy, obviously when we put the political party together, one of our policies is going to be paying people to be carers for their own children. So like right now you have a situation where if you say you have a two year old, you’re a mother, you want to go back to work, the taxpayer, through the government, will give you a childcare rebate so the taxpayer will pay some Filipino immigrant to look after your kid in some child care facility surrounded by freaks and non-Whites and potentially pedos so that you can go and work because otherwise you wouldn’t be able to afford to work basically because you can’t even afford to pay child care costs for your own kid. That’s ridiculous!

 

But then if you’re a stay at home mom, you get nothing. It’s a completely perverse incentive. So what we’re going to do is reverse it and pay, fuck the child care rebate. If you want to go and work, you got to figure out who’s going to look after your kids if you can’t.

 

But if you’re going to look after your own kids, the society should pay you. We a collapsed birth rate, we need to have more White babies, we need to have more young Australian babies. And so we’ve got to make it economically viable for young families to have children.

 

So that’s going to be one of our signature policies. I think it’ll be very popular. I think women will like it. I think young men will like it too, because it takes the pressure off them too. If your missus is getting paid big money to raise your kids well, then raising a family on a single income becomes possible again. Say she’s getting 70, 80 grand a year from Centrelink and then you’re out making 100 grand a year or whatever. Now you’ve got a decent income so you can make a life for yourself.

 

Catenaria said:

 

“What are your thoughts on human rights? The right to life, liberty, security, freedom of speech, assembly and expression. Are they inherent and universal? Should they be protected?”

 

I don’t believe human rights exist. They are not inherent, they’re not universal, they’re social constructs. Should we construct them within our societies is a different question. I think within White societies, the maximum amount of freedom that can be apportioned to your population without compromising the security of your nation, should be afforded.

 

So I don’t think we should give freedom to communists, to traitor elements within the society, to, or definitely not to foreigners, alien foreign interests in our society, trying to subvert it and undermine it. But I think normal White people should have freedom of speech and assembly and expression. Absolutely!

 

So, yeah, but they’re social constructs, which means that there’s nothing universal inherent about them. They were dreamt up in the 20th century. No one ever thought they existed before then, because they don’t. They’re just phantasms of the mind. They’re ideological constructs, they have no metaphysical basis.

 

Blair Cottrell: Obviously, that’s true. But perhaps the essence of the question is, would you maintain any sort of semblance of human rights, like, let’s say you get everything you want and you’ve got a White ethno-state. Would you keep the concept of human rights, like, woven into Australian law, or would you?

 

Joel Davis: Not human rights. Not human rights. But I think having rights for the Australian people, specifically the White Australian People, they should have rights. We should guarantee their rights. But enemies of the nation and foreign alien interests should not have rights. Fuck you! Go create your own country somewhere else and get them to give you rights. Our government is responsible for securing the rights of our people, not anybody else. And we could make. And we could respect the rights of like all White people, let’s say with got cousin nations around the world and we can respect their rights and they would respect our rights and things like that. But it’s a construct, it’s a decision, it’s not an absolute!

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d be more concerned with conducting myself with dignity and strength rather than arbitrary concepts. Abstract concepts like rights to life, liberty, freedom of speech. These are all very, I don’t know, you’ve got to understand that when you have concepts like that that are available to everyone in a specific country, then that country becomes receptive to external threats, subversion. People are going to use those rights against you. They’re going to get into your country and they’re going to use that shit against you. So that’s a problem. There’s a bit to unpack there.

 

But this is the kind of thing that you sit around a table with some other very learnt people and you discuss where the boundaries, where you’re going to draw the line with stuff like this, and how you’re actually going to define your state form. Because I don’t like concepts like the ones that were enshrined into the basis of Australian democracy. You know, the ones I grew up with, as I explained earlier in the stream. Because they’re all bullshit! And they’re just used by enemies of our country to subvert and exploit our country and extract the wealth generated by the Labor in our country and send it overseas and you know, get up to all sorts of mischief in the process. To the extent where our children. The greatest thing our children contend with in public schools is:

 

“What gender am I?”

 

You know, all of this has been the result of freedom of expression and human rights and stuff like that. Right. That’s just opened the door for all manner of subversives to come into this country and work their bullshit magics. So like I don’t go for that kind of stuff. But I do believe in honour, dignity, being fair. I believe in harsh punishments, but fair punishments nonetheless. I believe in consequences, that kind of thing. But as I said, there’s a lot to unpack here, isn’t there?

 

[1:52:21]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I also believe that thinking of rights only at the level of the individual is wrong. I think groups have rights if we’re going, … And I don’t think rights exist metaphysically. I think they’re constructs.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, they don’t! But that’s why I said you need to sit around a table and like, determine what the rights are.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! But I think groups need to have rights too. When we sit down and we say:

 

“Okay, well, individuals want to have rights.”

 

Okay, but groups need to have rights. So the nation needs to have rights too. The nation needs to be able to say:

 

“Well, this is what the nation needs in order to survive and to maintain itself. And those rights need to be respected.”

 

And in some respects they impair upon individual rights. So like I wouldn’t in a kind of, in the ethno-state, normal, healthy White people, if you want to marry another normal, normal, healthy member of the opposite sex, okay. I don’t think we should be like micromanaging that. I know there’s some eugenics spergs who think that, but I think that’s kind of really unromantic and inhumane. So okay, but then like, if you fall in love with like, I don’t know, an African woman. No! Like, we’re not going to allow that. That’s disgusting! Just like if you fall in love with your dog and you want to marry your dog. No, we’re not going to allow that either. That’s fucking disgusting!

 

Blair Cottrell: So I’m sure the African women aren’t akin to dogs? You’re talking about an actual animal versus a different, …

 

Joel Davis: Rather have a dog in my house, to be honest, than a fucking African woman.

 

Blair Cottrell: So. [chuckling] Yeah, what did you say before that? What was unromantic or inhumane? Oh, like you gave an example.

 

Joel Davis: Allowing free healthy White people to marry whatever member of the opposite sex they want to marry. I said:

 

“I think restricting that too much is inhumane, unromantic.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, so you’re a romantic?

 

Joel Davis: We had like eugenics doing the like, nerd calculations on the genetics and we’re like:

 

“Computer says you’ve got to like marry this person!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Well let’s create a scenario somewhere in the middle. Let’s say that a White guy wants to marry Arab woman.

 

Joel Davis: Well, no! Because you’re violating the rights of the White Australian nation to perpetuate itself. You’re poisoning the blood of our nation. It’s not about you.

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re interfering with free will. And you got to understand when you ban something, you kind of make it in a taboo way more desirable to the darker nature of people. So you got to be careful with outright banning shit like that! You’ve got to discourage it and put social pressure on them.

 

Joel Davis: You know it used to be illegal in Australia, right. You know, miscegenation, like mixed race marriages used to be illegal.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right, right, I get that. But I think it would be more effective if, …

 

Joel Davis: Does everyone find it super desirable to, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Australian society right now, the way it is right now, and you just outright ban miscegenation now, I don’t know, I think you’d almost make it even more taboo. And you know when you tell a child don’t do something, you ban a child from like watching a certain TV show for example, that they kind of want to watch, then going to try harder to watch it.

 

Joel Davis: Well, you can do it, but you can move to their country and do it. I mean we want to kick them out of our country. So how are we going to let you bring in non-Whites into our country just because you want to marry them? If you want to marry them, you’re going to go to their country and marry them. But we’re not bringing in a bunch of Filipino wives into Australia and creating all these hapa franken children. Go to the Philippines if you want to.

 

Blair Cottrell: I get it. Again, at the very least, I don’t want to say illusion, but the idea of free will I think is still an important thing, because you need to show White people respect, they need to believe they have free will. I think a necessary amount of social pressure can be put on people.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but if you want rights, like if you want the nation to give you rights, you also have to respect the nation’s rights. So if you’re going to violate the nation with your rights, why should the nation continue to defend your rights? Doesn’t make any sense. It’s not reciprocal.

 

So like if you want to go in and like breed with foreign people that we deem collectively [words unclear] we’re going to expel you from the nation, you’re no longer an Australian. Take your passport and you can fuck off!

 

[1:56:39]

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. So you’re still giving the person the choice, but they have to relinquish the privileges that they’ve obtained by being Australian in order to violate the principles of the nation. I understand that. See, that’s fair. Yeah, I suppose I’m with you on that one. I just get a little bit, because I’ve always valued my own, my own autonomy.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but like the thing is White guys with Asian wives. So often I see a critic on the Internet of us and our ideology who seems like a normal White dude, and then you click on the profile and you see the Asian wife almost every time!

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you always click on the profiles of your critics to check their posting?

 

Joel Davis: On profiles all day? If I was always clicking on them I’d be doing it all day.

 

Blair Cottrell: [chuckling] Do you have any critics who you take seriously, though? Because most of the people who criticise you are not like serious critics. They’re just people that don’t like you for some reason. They don’t like something you said. Have you got any serious critics that you can, …

 

Joel Davis: They’re not really critics. I mean, I’ve had debates with people that I respect over the years who, where there are interesting debates on a particular issue. Like, I debated like the Russia, Ukraine thing with a lot of people, and I respect people that have different opinions on that issue or various other issues. I don’t think every issue is so cut and dry. And it’s interesting to hear out two positions on a lot of issues.

 

But then there’s when people are just kind of vitriolic and just hate you for emotional reasons, there’s nothing that interesting that they’re saying, you’re not really dealing with, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what I meant. Like, is there anyone who really stimulates Joel Davis, a critic that you consider to be roughly equal, who actually gets your brain moving, you enjoy actually arguing with them? Is there anyone like that?

 

Joel Davis: I haven’t found good, I used to have more people like that. But I haven’t found many good opponents lately.

 

I mean, I had a good little like, text debate with Keith Woods a few months ago. That was fun, where it was actually like a more substantive debate. But yeah, it’s hard to find good, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I sometimes wish I disagreed with. I sometimes wish I disagreed with you more on things so I could argue with you a little bit more. You would run rings around me usually.

 

But when I’ve had a good sleep and I’m in the right mood, I think we could have some really good mental clashes. I know that you kind of thrive on that kind of stuff too. I’ve noticed. Like, I watched last week’s stream with Ninja. I watched most of it and I thought to myself, next time Ninja comes on, he should try to contend with you on a few things or at least ask you to explain things further. Maybe challenge you once or twice, because I’ve noticed that that’s what really gets you going. You need that oppositional force to reckon with joel Davis: Yeah. I like debating. I like entertaining two sides. People are saying Drew Pavlou. I mean, I would go on Drew’s show if Drew wants to. I know he’s live streaming, like, every day now because he’s trying to stack Superchat coin. If he wants to get some views. Here’s one for you guys that are on Twitter. Go tell Drew Pavlou to extend the invite if he wants to have me on casual stream. We can debate things. We can discuss what’s going on in Australian culture.

 

Blair Cottrell: Drew, if you’re watching this. I don’t really know you that well. I don’t click on your profile. I’m not even allowed on Twitter. But it’s 100% a good idea. It was one of the most entertaining things I’ve ever watched. People into politics, they watched that debate that you did with Joel and thought it was really entertaining. I don’t think you could go wrong if you want to actually produce good content. I think you and Joel being in the room together again could be really good!

 

Joel Davis: Wouldn’t have to be in the room together. Like, we could just do like a Streamyard stream on his YouTube or whatever. But he’s streaming all the time and he’s just getting random people from Twitter on there. He’s getting guys that are like nationalists and stuff on there. He seems like he’s happy to talk to anyone.

 

So, yeah, someone clipped this. Drew, if you want to have a conversation, if you want to debate the issues of the day, discuss the issues of the day or whatever, a bit of content. I think it’ll get views, reach out, someone put us in touch. Let’s tee it up. I think it’d be interesting content. You know, I find Drew to be an interesting guy. He’s wrong about a lot of things, but he’s got a fun personality. I like his style. I find him to be a humourous interlocutor.

 

So let’s have a chat.

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s got lot of mental energy. I’ll give him that. He’s got a lot of mental energy. He posts on X like, 40 times a day.

 

Joel Davis: People are saying that it froze up when I said that. Is it still frozen?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it is. That’s why I was laughing, because you’re like someone clipped this and it’s just like a blurry 144p.

 

[2:01:55]

 

Joel Davis: For fuck’s sake! I don’t know what’s going on with my Internet this evening.

 

Blair Cottrell: Look, man, we got to wrap it up. I gotta go. I’m sorry, guys. I’m having a good time!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, Modern World Reject said, he threw a big Roman. He said:

 

“Indian stink!”

 

That’s the last Superchat, so we’ll end the show there.

 

Also, someone in the chat said debate Mike Enoch. Well, if he wants to have a discussion, I’ve had him on before.

 

Blair Cottrell: If I heard that Mike Enoch talks some shit about, not talked some shit about you, but how to go at you for your take on Iran, Israel situation.

 

Joel Davis: I think that was vindicated. Yeah, my take, that was vindicated. So look, I haven’t actually listened to that podcast, but people told me that too.

 

If you want to have a discussion, Mike. Yeah, I’m a fair guy. I’m happy to listen to his point of view. We agree on a lot of things, on most things. So be a fun conversation. Click this. If I’m not frozen, send it to the TRS guys, happy to talk to Mike, but yeah, I’m an open minded guy. I’m a fair guy willing to debate and discuss the issues.

 

So let’s talk about it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Before we, before we finish up. We’ve got a question for you. Is boredom a problem for you? Because I’ve realised you get like, you just have a brain that moves all the time. It’s always ticking over. It seems to be that way. Do you ever feel bored or like you’re battling boredom? Is that an issue for you?

 

Joel Davis: Not really. Only if I’m like forcibly subjected to something which is boring. But if I’m free to do my own thing, I’m never bored.

 

Blair Cottrell: So if you’re on your own, if you’re like spending periods of time during the day by yourself, like you’re not the sort of person who needs to distract yourself or find lots of things to do or think about. Like, you’re always okay with your own company. You’re always fine sitting there with your own thoughts, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I just, I feel like I don’t get enough time to myself.

 

Blair Cottrell: But yeah, no, I can relate to that. Yeah, it’s actually a good sign. Yeah, I noticed a lot of fixed personalities are like that. Like they always want more time to themselves and they seem to benefit by spending time with themselves. And I definitely fall into that category. I feel like I fall into that category, too.

 

But anyway, thanks for joining us, guys. We’ll see you guys next week, I guess. I’ve got a big weekend, so take care. Anything else, Joel, before we finish?

 

Joel Davis: No, just White power! Hail victory! Blood and honour! We’ll see you all next time.

 

Blair Cottrell: See you later, guys.

 

[2:04:38]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/28/2025 = 21 )

BeamRider101
1 day ago
Foreign operatives paying criminals to stage hoax terrorism, to then get our speech laws changed, then the people in government changing those laws, failing to show up at the inquiry, is outrageous, normally it’d be instant dismissal and total overhaul of the government, but they appear to be getting away with it again.
11 likes

Report
BradC1988
1 day ago
Ban black cunts, not knives in Australia.
10 likes

Report
thorne91
Supporter+
1 day ago
JFK was a real American
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
SSlieutenant
21 hours ago
The First Catholic POTUS
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
RoseRock444
Supporter
21 hours ago
Disgusting
0 likes

Report
leibekohne
1 day ago
China was created by jew with stolen intellectual properties just to create today’s war situation. All is pre-planned as covid was to murder legally especially young American solders, but to depopulate and destroy world usurious economy. Traitor Tramp is jewish puppet bitch. This all proofs that nothing would be changed through jew voting scum and evil democracy.
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
SSlieutenant
22 hours ago
Canada does the same thing, calling a homosexual a f-g is a $10,000 fine or jailtime.
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
22 hours ago
Did China turn on the jews under Ci Jinping?
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
mharrison52
21 hours ago
seeing us congressman calling for war with China, id say there’s a good chance. china is close to being nat soc if you really think about it.
0 likes

Report
leibekohne
1 day ago
Now it the time to register Party and nail jew for good to the coffin once and for all.
3 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
Motown88
Supporter
22 hours ago
When Whites become a minority in AU there won’t be any special privilege for minorities like there is now… In fact, persecution will go into full blown legal discrimination. South Africa is the canary in the coal mine.
3 likes

Report
mikecleary84
1 day ago
blurryish
2 likes

Report
thorne91
Supporter+
1 day ago
24:05 Blair that was fucking hilarious
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
thorne91
Supporter+
1 day ago
I was laughing so hard at this my sides hurt
1 like

Report
hailslcants
1 day ago
hey guys
0 likes

Report
hailslcants
1 day ago
what time u starting u cants?
0 likes

Report
mikecleary84
1 day ago
good enough guys
0 likes

Report
BigotSmalls
Supporter
1 day ago
LFG crew. ORG keep up with the conversation. Like share chalk.
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
22 hours ago
First 25 minutes of the show: Eldridge Colby policy William Colby his grandfather was head of CIA Anglo Americans, CIA was an Anglo organization but was couped by jews during WW2 and after JFK 1963/ replaced under LBJ Eldridge was in 1st Trump Admin and told them that China must be focused on at all costs or America will fall. His policy is intuitive, Netanyahu violated this policy by striking Iran. China is top supplier to Iran. Netanyahu is greedy and wants greater israel and cannot accept backseat. Iran is stronger than israel, and Net wants to sack US to defeat Iran. US public does not support this war. Not to mention Israel trade relationship with China.
0 likes

Report
Motown88
Supporter
21 hours ago
Your description of Gen X is lacking in understanding and knowledge… Probably has a lot to do with your millennial sense of entitlement.
0 likes

=================

ODESSY COMMENTS

22 comments

HyperChat minimums:
100 LBC
0
Doom Nebulae
16 hours ago
Why the fuck would you go fight China on behalf of ZOG?! This is beyond stupid.

6
0
GenuineGoy
1 day ago
Mike Enoch is obviously jewish in his physical appearance, and it’s confirmed by his jewish ex wife.

1
1
Hide replies
King Tut
4 hours ago
fuck Mike Enoch! every time he opens his mouth, all I hear is verbal diahreah. he is the reason why I could never get into TRS.

0
1
Cone of Silence
1 day ago
If you would like to broaden your purview on just how long, the US and us by proxy, have been subverted by Israel, the watch the last 2 episodes from Blackpilled.com

2
0
Reclaim
5 hours ago(edited)
some indian guy came to my office once and kept trying to show me his fancy watch and I was like dude, I really don’t care about such things.

1
0
GenuineGoy
1 day ago
Mike peinovich is jewish.

0
2

@EverybodywakeUp
2 hours ago
Blair hit it on the head with boomers, my mum is a boomer and she works so hard. Since she was 16, she can’t not work and always wants to be busy.

King Tut
5 hours ago
Jews aren’t just overplaying the holohoax card, but the “Nazi” card. recently at a US Senate hearing Kristi Noem and Ice were compared to “Nazis hunting down Jews” by some Jew or shabbos goy. it was pathetic! they basically saying you aren’t allowed to deport invaders who broke our laws and came to US illegally because if you do, you’re a “Nazi”.

Cecil
5 hours ago
china will take Taiwan without a shot. They have been infiltrating it for years and putting their own people in place

1
0

@CloudWhine
10 hours ago
Also, you mentioned there being ZERO evidence that Trump is a Russian Agent. I am not saying he is or isn’t, go watch the documentaries The Dubious Friends Of Donald Trump and Active Measures. Trumps deep financial ties to Russian crime and even Soviet actors goes back to the 80s and his close ties to Russian mob are undeniable. So, please review that information and revise your position. This is embarrassing.

@CloudWhine
10 hours ago
Your take on Taiwan is painfully misinformed. It is as if you are getting your information from people like McGregor and Ritter, two literal Russian sycophants. The COMMUNISTS didn’t fight alongside the Chinese Nationalists in ww2, they fled to the mountains, and when the war was over and the nationalists were beleaguered, they came down and took over. Taiwan was NEVER NEVER NEVER Part of the the CCP. Fuck China, Fuck Duginist multipolarity. Dugin is Anti White and Anti West, and youd know that if you actually listened to his long format interviews. He and Putin say their commitment to multiculturalism often. Let me guess, 4D chess? They have to say it? Forgive me if Im wrong and you know that he is a multiculturalist. Real reform looks like taking back our countries, not destroying them so 1 billion Chinese and 1 billion Indians can take over, and we get raped and killed in the aftermath. There is ZERO chance that have a Renaissance if we fall into disrepair. Our planned genocide is on the table, and will happen the second we become a punching bag for the world. Honestly, go get your information about taiwan from other sources than RT stooges or American politicians on the take from China.

1
0
GenuineGoy
1 day ago
have a good day everyone

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
thanks guys o/

Rebbe Schneerson
1 day ago
He admitted it himself

Rebbe Schneerson
1 day ago
^^^

Walther Mauser
1 day ago
Yep, Nature is racist. It is only natural.

scoobyburn
1 day ago
anti septic

warren-g
1 day ago

@ConeOfSilence
the last one was pretty good

Callaghan
1 day ago

@Daniel
1 day ago
Best show of the week coming up boys

@Daniel
1 day agoAUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE

Callaghan
1 day ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer: Greetings. Good day. Good afternoon. Hello, wherever you are. Today’s date is August, 24, 2024. This is episode nine of The Flip Side with Monika. And I am your host, Monika Schaefer. Before I introduce today’s guest, I’ll give you the phone numbers to call after the bottom of the hour. We like to invite guests or callers to call in. And those numbers are 512-248-8252 or 1800 313 9443.

 

Okay, today’s guest is Grace Eki Oyama. And I’ll just give you a brief, a story of how I met Grace Eki. And this was back in 2015. So nine years ago almost. I attended the trial, the speech crime trial of Arthur Topham in Quesnel, British Columbia, Canada. And there I met some very interesting people.

 

And one of the people I met was Grace Eki Oyama. And it turns out she had attended other such trials and was very, very knowledgeable in many things.

 

And at that time we were talking about World War Two history, those kinds of things. The kind, the very subject that I got into some trouble with the powers that should not be, the Holocaust subject and all those things. So Grace Eki Oyama has been in this for a long time.

 

And today we’re going to talk about some other subjects a little bit different from that. But I’ll just, before I bring her on, I will just say that in my Chatango site, this is the chat room. And how you can find that chat room, it’s all spelled out The Flipside W Monika. So instead of with. It’s just a W.

 

So the Flipside W Monika Chatango. That’s Chatango. Chatango. Chatango.com. And I posted a video. It’s a five minute short video. It’s called The World Owes Germany an Apology for World War Two. And that’s a video of Grace Eki, who made this very brilliant and succinct little five minute talk, which was this apology.

 

And so I’ll let her talk a little bit about that too, because we were just revisiting that a few minutes ago. But the subject we’re going to talk about today are about musical frequency. And people have probably heard about 440 being the standard tuning for A and many people these days are aware that perhaps 432 might be a better frequency. So that’s one of our subjects.

 

And the other subject, and I had put this into the show notes, if you’re going to find this in the archives, is on the three stages. This is a Japanese philosophy about the three stages of development, childhood development. And I will let her just discuss that at length. So, Grace Eki, are you there?

 

Grace: Yes. Hello, Monika.

 

Monika Schaefer: Welcome.

 

Grace: Thank you.

 

Monika Schaefer: Would you like to start about this, the title of that video? Because we just talked about that a few minutes ago.

 

Grace: Yes. Because often it’s not me who put the title, but what I wanted to say. And if you. The idea was war is war. And then I feel that the world does owe an apology for what happened to the Germans, actually, after the war, how they were treated, and also the fact that there is no real official peace treaty, and the expellees, et cetera, et cetera. I think that’s very important for people to know and understand, because it leads away for the problem in what’s happening now in Palestine. There is a similarity, but the fact that it is not known at all, it’s a shame, because it’s things that, oh, including the Nuremberg, which was not a real trial, nor was it very fair.

 

And so that was the part that I wanted people to be at least conscious of.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, thank you for that. Just clarifying that that wasn’t, you know, our main subject today. But it does give the audience, the listener, a little bit of background about first of all, I explained how I met you was at this speech crime trial. And why don’t you give a little bit of a snapshot about background of yourself? I know you’ve done many things. You’ve lived in many places. You’ve been a writer, you’ve been a translator.

 

Can you just give maybe a couple of minutes, a bit of background of yourself?

 

Grace: Well, a couple of minutes.

 

Monika Schaefer: Maybe that’s not possible! [chuckling]

 

Grace: Once we get into the detail, we can go all over. But maybe, just as an honor to my father, I just want to add the fact that my father participated in World War Two. And the fact that he is a martial artist of karate.

 

So I wanted to say that you are brought up in a different environment than if my father was a banker, or a businessman, or a Professor, let’s say. And that was one thing.

 

And then later on, I worked with this researcher, a Japanese researcher who would also make history on his own. But his name is Ryu Ota. And Ota is the one who got me very much interested in, … Well, what really happened was when Eustace Mullins came to Japan, there was a presentation with a professional translator. And the translator, I realized, wasn’t really translating, not accurately. And it was about 9/11. And whatever Mr Mullins was saying, basically, she was translating it the opposite. I almost thought she could be a saboteur. But later on, I understood this, that we, first of all, in Italian they say, “translator traitors”. “Traditore, traditore”. Because it can’t be helped because you can only translate something that you understand. So she wasn’t, I feel, purposely doing that. But from her standard of knowledge and common sense, the alternative so-called conspiratorial theory sounded so absurd, I think she just couldn’t digest it and kind of purified the translation.

 

[08:40]

 

Monika Schaefer: Wow! And when you say 9/11, you’re talking about 9/11, the events of September 11, 2001, right?

 

Grace: Correct?

 

Monika Schaefer: To clarify, yes. Oh, that’s very interesting.

 

Grace: Well, he said a lot of interesting things, but she was diluting it down.

 

But anyway, so what I did was I wrote out what Mr Mullins said and what the translator said, and how I would have translated what I feel he really said. And I showed it to Ota. And ever since then, he’s asked me to basically become his translator. And through him, I met really not just Eustace Mullins, but he had more than 13 books by John Coleman translated into Japanese. Now he’s famous for the Committee of Three Hundred. He also, I think, was the first to talk about Bohemian Club and Bilderberg. I was also his translator when David Icke came two times when Ota called David Ike to Japan, for example. And he would have called Webster Tarpley. But unfortunately, he became ill and died. And that was about 2009 anyway.

 

So that taught me very much. That’s how I found out a lot about true history in the West. Yeah, true history in the West.

 

Despite this slogan of “democracy and freedom”, there really wasn’t., … You know, one of the reason about Arthur Topham’s trial is like, do we really have free speech? And ever since I found out about Zundel.

 

Monika Schaefer: Ernst Zundel.

 

Grace: Yes. And when the court in Canada, when the court judged that “truth is no defense”, I was so shocked! Because, well, how else are you expected to defend yourself? Yes, I just found it so absurd!

 

And I think that is, at least in, as far as Canada is concerned, that was when things started to crack. That was like the beginning of the cracking of the justice system.

 

And the other thing is that I really, honestly believe in freedom of speech. Even for your enemies, even for things that you don’t like. Because that’s the only way. I don’t want to sound like cliche, but the only way to peace is through negotiation and through diplomacy and so forth. And it saddens me also to see what is happening with Ukraine and Russia, too.

 

But instead of diplomacy or negotiation, basically a dialogue, it seems that the world has gone mad, and it’s like more money, more arms, more of the things that’s, more sanctions more of the things that’s really not a solution or working!

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. And I would say the really important element is deception. Right? In all these things that are happening.

 

Grace: Well, like, I think we would all agree that without deception, war is not possible, that war is propaganda!

 

Monika Schaefer: I’ve never heard anybody say it that way. That’s really, really good! That’s profound. I would say. [chuckling]

 

Grace: Thank you.

 

But I also think you have to demonize the enemy, because if you had one drop of sympathy, imagination, or compassion, you really could not have war.

 

So you have to demonize or as an “alien”, I say alien in quotation Mark because it can mean many things, but something so foreign and different and something to be demonized! And I’m sure you would understand.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

And, I mean, otherwise you wouldn’t have all these soldiers going and killing people who look like them, especially all these brother wars. Cousin wars.

 

Grace: Yeah.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. For sure. So, Grac Eki, that’s really very, very good! Thank you. I didn’t know how your beginnings were in translation, but that’s how you met all these people and then learned a lot about true history. And then I know that you were a writer for a while, I think, at the American Free Press.

 

Grace: No. Well, I had a job with them at the Barnes Review for a while, but it was very short. It was work, but that’s how I managed to go to Palestine in Israel.

 

So I am very appreciative of their help at that time.

 

Monika Schaefer: Right, right. Okay. Well, would you, do you feel ready to jump into the first of our subjects that we., … And the reason we’re going to talk about this, people might say:

 

“Well, why? This is kind of unrelated to anything else.”

 

But Gracie spent a few weeks with me a month or so ago, and we, of course, had time to talk about lots of things.

 

And I like to play music, and we talked about these frequencies. And generally, people, the standard tuning is for A is 440.

 

Now, anybody who plays and tunes up their instrument, they’ll know that.

 

Now, we talked about this other frequency, A 432. And I was just delighted and surprised to hear Grace Eki talk about this because you revealed to me that a lot about this.

 

And so I thought:

 

“Oh, well, we have to talk about this on the show.”

 

[chuckling] So tell us a little bit about how did that come to be that this frequency of 440 was pushed upon us. I think that’s what we had talked about when you were here.

 

Grace: But Monika, it’s not always 440. It can be 442. And I have heard of 446, so it isn’t always 440 either. It can even be higher.

 

Monika Schaefer: Well, I’ve heard that there are some orchestras that in Europe, for example, who are pushing to have the 442 tuning, and it’s just kind of tightening things up.

 

I feel like it’s tightening up a tight wire and to the bursting point or something. So go ahead and talk about the history, perhaps.

 

Grace: I would also say from 1980 to 85, I was in Italy actually studying music, you see, and around that time, there was also this revival of Baroque music and original instruments.

 

So I was always interested in this. But in order to save time, I will be a little bit practical.

 

I happen to be very, very fond of the Italian composer Verdi. This is also called La Verdiana, meaning Verdi’s A, meaning. He thought this was the best that it should be. This was the best pitch. So I assume that was the pitch he was writing in.

 

[16:13]

 

Monika Schaefer: Sorry, which was the best pitch?

 

Grace: Well, it depends how you count it. But basically 432.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Grace: If you want to really get into the science and all this is actually supposed to be like 430.8 or something, but because it depends how you count it from, the, C equals 256.

 

But in order to simplify, I also, later on, I knew, have you ever heard of Schiller Institute in Washington, DC?

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Grace: But anyway, there was a politician called Lyndon Larouche and his wife Helga, who is German. She heads the Schiller Institute. They only doer. Music and performances in a A equals 430 or 432. And from their Institute, if you Google, you can see musicians actually performing for you in two different pitch. I was lucky. I tried to look for some of the things that I managed to experience a long time ago, but not everything is on the Internet still, and I couldn’t find it.

 

So I’ll tell you one radio program with Carlo Bergonzi, but he was like the Italian star tenor. And in that radio program, he actually has three, like, graduate students in music singing opera arias in both pitches.

 

And all of them said that it feels so much natural to sing in 432 as opposed to 440. And Bergonzi would explain why he feels that is. I also, …

 

Monika Schaefer: Can you tell us a little bit about that? Why that is? Why does it feel better?

 

Grace: Well, first of all, I think you are getting, apparently the standard for classical music was about 430, 32, definitely until the fifties with Fruk Wengler [sp].

 

Now, you know, there are many people who like retro recordings. Could there be a possibility that the pitch does also influence? Is one.

 

And the other thing is that let’s try to get nearer to the composer’s original intent.

 

And the other thing is that without going into too much detail, we have chest and middle voice and high voice.

 

Now, if you, if the tuning is too high, your voice register changes at the wrong place, and that may not reflect correctly with the words that’s meant to be colored. Before you go and ask me, let me just add, I was also fortunate enough, … So there was a time when these musicians were actually doing presentation, like Norbert Brining. He was like the head of the Amadeus Quartet, and he actually played Bach Partita in two tones right in front of you, and you can feel the difference.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes.

 

Grace: Now, at the same time, I also want to tell you that there are people who like brilliant, who don’t like, who prefer the more brilliant tilling sounds.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Grace: And, but anyway, Verdi lost. Why? Apparently the Russian military equipments were already tuned higher and it, they can be more penetrating and they can be heard much better at distance. So for like, military bands in the 1800s.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Grace: That was their preferred pitch.

 

Monika Schaefer: I just want to, if I may jump in, for people who have not heard about this and they might think, well, why don’t you just play in a different key? That’s not actually what happens with this different tuning. It’s not just simply playing in a lower key. Like instead of C being C, go to B flat or something. That’s not what’s happening. This frequency is, I would say it’s less than a quarter tone or something. It’s really just a change in frequency. And it literally just is., … It’s something that we, … We all have a vibration. We all have a frequency. Everything around us is vibrating at a frequency. And the 432 frequency for the A is, to my knowledge, a more natural frequency that we simply, our bodies will vibrate more naturally to that.

 

So that’s the important point to make here. Otherwise people will say:

 

“Well, why don’t you just play lower, play in a lower key?”

 

[chuckling]

 

Grace: Just like when you change the tonality, the coloring of the piece changes. It’s a very subtle difference. But I would just say that for people interested, try looking for this kind of experiment that was done where they would switch the pitch, and you can also see what you, how you feel.

 

And as a last comment on this, I want to add that when I changed my piano tuning to 432, my daughter, who was in kindergarten, said:

 

“Much more relaxing!”

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Grace: That was the key for me.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes. So I did that once, Gracie Aki. I paid the piano tuner extra because it took longer, and I got him to tune my piano down to 432.

 

But then my next music jam, when I was asking all the musicians to tune their instruments down the guy with the twelve string guitar, [chuckling] and they didn’t appreciate it! [chuckling] So it didn’t work out. Well, that’s the problem. When we have this standard tuning that everybody’s tuned to and when we’re playing with people, we have to come to the agreement where we’re going to be tuned at. And what about accordions? I mean, all these instruments are tuned to that certain frequency.

 

So that’s a little bit of a, just a technical problem with this.

 

But it’s an interesting subject, and I do hope that maybe we’ll get some callers after the bottom of the hour on that subject.

 

I mean, I don’t want to be sounding like we’re jumping around one subject to another, but I think these things all kind of do relate back to us because it’s like we’re being, you know, damaged or assaulted on all fronts, and this is one of them. I do think that the musical frequencies is just another way that those who wish us harm are, you know, degrading us and this kind of thing. But unless you had something more that you wanted to talk about that.

 

[23:25]

 

Grace: Well, yeah, let me ask you, more for people can also try and find things, but 432 mathematically is two to the fourth power times three to the third power. And I have seen documentation how it corresponds with many other amphithegorian numbers.

 

But we don’t have time to really go into that. But I feel like, and before we go into that, let me, can I give you my favorite quote of Mozart, which is that he said:

 

“Music is painted on the canvas of silence.”

 

And that’s the other thing we are lacking. We don’t have enough silence!

 

And the other thing is that I think there is, music is used especially, … How can I explain this? Okay. Records used to, the sound would come in waves.

 

And I’m not so sure about the cassette, but I think it’s still rather relaxing compared to the CDs, all this digital sound, they actually come in square blocks exactly like in the computer screen. If you enlarge it’s made from little squares.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes. Pixels and pixels, right?

 

Grace: Correct. And it’s the same thing with music. You break it down into blocks and then you remake it, but it’s in blocks as opposed to waves. This is my personal comment, and I’m very much interested if anybody else ever felt the same, but I don’t listen so much to CDs anymore. It hurts my ear after a while.

 

Monika Schaefer: That’s so interesting. There’s a real resurgence in people buying records. Records, actual records, because it is a different quality of sound. It really is. And I’m sure that many people are nodding their heads as we’re speaking about this. For sure. For sure.

 

And that quote, because I just interrupted just when you were saying it was Mozart, did you say?

 

Grace: Yes. It’s hard to find the original, so I cannot guarantee.

 

But it’s supposed to be something he wrote in a letter.

 

Monika Schaefer: I think it’s very apt. We do need silence, and it’s Sorely lacking. [chuckling]

 

Grace: And [chuckling] the fact that it’s only beautiful because there’s the pause is one. And second. Mozart was like a kind of child prodigy that can say:

 

“Oh, the birds are Twittering in G major.”

 

For example, and I think he could hear natural sounds and decipher them better than many of us.

 

But I think that’s one of the reasons why his work is so eternal. And it seems to, … I’ve read research is how it increases the IQ of children.

 

Monika Schaefer: Oh, yes.

 

Actually, that’s a very good point. People say if you have Mozarte while you’re studying, you do better on your exams! [chuckling]

 

Grace: Interesting! No? And so but shall I, … Let’s move to the next.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, I just found this was the most interesting thing. And we’ll just have a couple of minutes before the bottom of the hour to touch on, but we’ll continue after the break. But you had talked to me about this Japanese. It’s a philosophy about the three stages of childhood. Go ahead.

 

Grace: It’s like a seven year cycle, but actually it corresponds very well to what Rudolph Steiner felt and thought, at least as far as education is concerned.

 

But this is the way I interpret. Well, in Japan, you are not adult until you are 20.

 

Monika Schaefer: Or 21? No? Because you said three times seven. The seven year cycle. Yes?

 

Grace: Well, although let’s say in the year that you will be 21, you are officially an adult. And it seems strange because if it’s just physical, you seem to have matured much earlier on. But apparently research has shown that human brain takes that long to genuinely finish maturing and growing, 20 years.

 

And the other thing I was trying to say is that, okay, for the first seven years, you’re just growing physically and you need a lot of physical activity. And then seven from 14, then you get your education in grammar and the basis. And then from, like, 14 till later, it’s, I think it corresponds to the classical concept of rhetoric. You know, grammar first, dialectic first, and then rhetorics. But it also, I don’t know exactly where and how I got this idea, but you’re physically, maybe even a 14, 15, you’re more or less done.

 

But as far as the concept of philosophy, physics, abstraction, spirituality, that kind of realm, you really don’t understand, you have to be at least 14, more or less. You know, we all have, like, I’m not talking about child prodigies or exceptional people. But usually it takes that long for you to really start to have that kind of capability to comprehend.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, it’s like the philosophical, the spiritual development, all of those things start after maturing.

 

We’ll come back after the break, Grace Eki, and you can discuss some of the factors that are stalling those processes. So please stick around and we’ll be back after the break.

 

[29:41]

[ad]

[36:00]

[music]

[36:58]

 

Monika Schaefer: All right, welcome back. That music is so beautiful! And it just makes me think of what you just told me about before World War Two, anyway, that it would have been commonplace for families in Europe and Germany to be playing chamber music together after supper, after dinner.

 

And can you imagine the enrichment that provided in their lives as opposed to being stuck in front of a screen.

 

But anyway, before we go on with our discussion, I’m just going to remind the listener, if you have the means, please, please do support the Republic broadcast broadcasting network.

 

And if you go to the website, there will be all the information there. There’s still the special on T-shirt that’s still going on right through September. A special T-shirt? I would say if you do, I think it’s a $100 donation.

 

And if you don’t have the means, there are other ways you can help this network, and that is by sharing these programs. And you can do that anyway, even if you are supporting financially or support the sponsors. Yeah. So this is not mainstream. We have such a we’re very fortunate to have the Republic Broadcasting Network so that we can speak freely and speak truth.

 

Okay. So we were going to get onto these three stages of development and this third stage, which is critically important, but it’s less visible to the eye because the physical growth has happened. And the learning, a lot of the learning is in school, like, you were talking about the grammar and this, that.

 

But this other thing that happens, it’s like philosophical spiritual development that comes in that third stage, does it not? And we had talked about, what are some of the things that could arrest that development? This is the critical part. Go ahead.

 

Grace: Well, like, I’ll put it bluntly. Sexualization! Over sexualization at a young age.

 

Now, the West is theoretically at least a Christian country.

 

And I think it’s somewhere in the Bible or the New Testament. Doesn’t it say something like:

 

“Children should not see wicked things.”

 

Or do you know?

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, no, I’m not familiar with, did you say a Bible verse?

 

Grace: But, anyway, innocence should be protected and childhood should be protected. It’s like you don’t offer a cigarette to a six year old.

 

Monika Schaefer: Right? No! And what are we seeing in the schools? I mean, this is a subject that we talk about often. I’ve talked about it before, the hyper sexualization, and it is shocking what is going on in the schools. And this is a direct attack on us, on our people, on our children. And my goodness, it’s beyond even just exposure. It’s like downright, you know, poisoning of the minds. And then even physical like:

 

“Oh, yeah, you don’t feel like a girl today. You want to take these hormone puberty blocking things and, oh, well, oh, well, just. Sure, we can cut off that penis!”

 

I mean, it is just over the top, outrageously bad what is going on! And I mean, it already, it started a while back, but now it’s just accelerated to beyond belief! And, you know what you say:

 

“Okay, there’s hypersexual or over sexualization of children at too young, of age.”

 

This arrests, arrests their emotional development.

 

Grace: And many other things. And it’s like, I think this was the metaphor I gave to you. It’s like you cannot force open a flower to blossom while it’s in the bud. You would damage it forever! You have to have patience, and it has to grow. Everyone, basically, personally, you have to discover so-called sex or sexuality in some ways on your own, because the internal makings of a human being is far more complicated. And you have to let it blossom in quotation Mark “naturally”, because we have been so cut off from nature. So everyone has to kind of figure it out by refining their instinct.

 

But it’s just like children can mimic words to appear sophisticated, but to have had the experience to back it up.

 

And frankly, there was a Japanese writer that said he feels sorry for the younger generation of Japanese because in Japanese there is a word for “love”, and there is another word specifically for “falling in love”. And he said that children have no time, basically, to discover that mysterious emotion of falling in love, for example.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes.

 

Grace: And the other thing is you know why I think the other thing is, in childhood you must play a lot!

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes.

 

Grace: It’s very important. Well, one of the things, and also you can’t, I think, the way they keep the children so occupied. So yeah. Because sometimes you must have a lot of breathing space and you must sometimes even be bored for you to become creative. I wonder if that’s an oxymoron.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, you’re absolutely right! I’ll just tell you, the German word for “boredom” is “Langeweile”, which literally means “long while”.

 

So it’s a completely different meaning on that. And I love that.

 

But, you know what? We have a couple of callers on the line.

 

Kathleen: Yes.

 

Monika Schaefer: And let’s take Kathleen from Texas.

 

Hello, Kathleen, are you there?

 

Kathleen: Hey, Monika and Grace. A great show. And I called because I heard an author interviewed about ten years ago, maybe on RBN, and he wrote a book called the “440 Conspiracy”. And it was all about. I heard him interviewed several times. It was very interesting. And he had said many of the things you’re talking about, but he was talking about that 432 was actually what everybody played before the Rockefeller changed it to all the marching bands of the horns were all made with the 440. And it was unnerving, and it was very good to get people nervous and upset about going to war or something.

 

Monika Schaefer: Well, is that something? So that sounds like a good book. Grace Eki, are you familiar with that book?

 

Grace: No, I don’t know that book. So thank you.

 

Monika Schaefer: Who was the author, please?

 

Kathleen: I don’t know that. I don’t remember the author’s name, but it was called, The 440 Conspiracy.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay, I’m gonna write that down and I’m gonna look that up. That’s great!

 

Kathleen: It was about ten years ago, so.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay, thank you. Do you have any additional comments?

 

Kathleen: No, I love your show. I mean, I heard you for a long time before you had the show. And you just been great. So I’ve enjoyed every one. And thank you so much!

 

Monika Schaefer: Thank you so much, Kathleen, for your call.

 

[45:22]

 

Kathleen: Yes. Oh, I loved it when you said that you’re an ice skater in the wild. [chuckling]

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. [chuckling]

 

Kathleen: Wild skating. Oh, that’s so great.

 

And then all of your music, it’s wonderful! And, Grace, I really appreciated everything that you said, too.

 

Grace: Okay. So thank you so much!

 

Monika Schaefer: Well, thank you for your call. Okay. So, Mr producer, could we please have Nightingale on line three? Are you there?

 

Nightingale: Yes. Monika, can you hear me?

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, we can. Thank you. Would you like to add a comment or question?

 

Nightingale: Thank you so much! I’m overjoyed to meet you. I want to say it’s an honor to meet such a brave, talented, honorable lady. Thank you so much! Just a fact that you play the music for your bumper music. I said, wow, RBM is getting classy. Fun! [chuckling] It was so beautiful! What a change. Usually I shut the bumpers off. Some of the host I listen to, I run to the phone and say:

 

“I don’t want to hear that!”

 

And I wait till the ads and the music are gone. [chuckling]

 

But with you, …

 

Monika Schaefer: That’s sweet of you. Thank you. Did you have any questions or comments for your guest, Grace Eki?

 

Nightingale: Yes, yes, I’m getting there. This has been fascinating! I just turned it on. Sometimes I listen live, sometimes it doesn’t work for me. I’m always on the cell phone, but sometimes it does a bit, and I turn it on just when your wonderful guest, her name is Grace. She’s been very, very personal to me. What I heard, very fascinating! She talked about a beautiful., … It was a beautiful anecdote. She thinks it’s from Mozart. That “music is painted on the canvas of silence”.

 

And I wanted to add that that is so beautiful, because it’s not just music, but it’s, I think, pretty much everything. Mystic experiences, the feeling of sacred is also. Everybody talks about it. All the mystics are on the, come out of silence. Even our myths of creation come out of silence. Things were “created by the word”, Elvero Incarnado, which is Spanish. What is it, the word incarnate? I don’t know if that’s that. But yeah, but it’s sound. Started creating the manifest world, I guess.

 

So this is very, very beautiful. And I heard many beautiful things. I heard the comment about spirituality, Rudolf Steiner ideas, spirituality developed later on.

 

But I have to say that I have to disagree with that a bit because I had, personally, some very mystical experiences. A very, very young child. And they did start going away. I totally agree with the over sexualization, because I think that’s when they started going away for me. Sex was just very much in my face with the world I lived in, my parents, and a lot of violence and jealousy! [chuckling] And it was always sad for me as a very young child.

 

But then when I hit puberty, I was very, very curious, and I did naughty things. You know, I wanted to see what this wonderful thing was. Right? And I learned that it wasn’t what it was touted to be. If love is not involved, if the falling in love, like you mentioned, but it can be a lot of fun. But it’s not falling in love. That’s a totally different thing.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Nightingale: This has been very personal, what you were speaking of, because, yes, I had a, as a very young person before I was into sex, you might say, I had even incredible out of body experience, which I will always cherish. I hope that just before I die, I get there again, because it was like total unity.

 

I don’t know if you guys ever felt that, but the only experience I’ve ever had that I reserved the word “bliss” for. And it was just, it was just fascinating because I was totally not there. But you’re in everything when you exist, I guess, what people call a cosmic consciousness. And it was this overwhelming, powerful light that was so incredibly beautiful.

 

But then I was, it was going to annihilate me, which is a very mystery because I was not there, and yet I felt totally annihilation. And somewhere, I guess I was very young, somewhere in the body, I guess I wasn’t ready to go. And I was at the moment, so I realized that fear the root of all our issues, because it was fear that brought me back into the body. And then I felt so horrible to be back in the cave, and I just hated myself for being a coward! But someday maybe it’ll come back and I’ll be ready too.

 

Monika Schaefer: That’s an incredibly profound experience. Thank you for sharing that, Grace Aki, do you have any comments about it?

 

Nightingale: Well, it has a lot. Yes. It relates to everything you’re speaking of and I think I was lucky enough, even though I did have a very turmoil, not very happy household growing up. And yet my father did play classical music, and so I was imprinted with that. And it was the old vinyls, I must say! [chuckling]

 

And I think that is what, …

 

Monika Schaefer: Sorry, go ahead. Grace, did you want to comment on that.

 

Grace: Yes. That I wanted to say. I agree with her. You know, silence is the base of everything. And she was saying the Bible, I think. No, sorry the Testament in the beginning was the word, and word was “God”, but the word is “vibration with intent”. And I do kind of agree and with silence will show how important this intent and so-called vibration is, even more in the future.

 

And as speaking, I just wanted to make a comment as far as the frequency is concerned. You know those famous water crystals?

 

[51:52]

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes.

 

Grace: Photographed. Well, if it’s the ones I have seen anyway, at A 432, it actually makes a flower. At A 4040, it makes the outline. It’s different.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes. And it scrambles it, doesn’t it? That’s what I’ve seen and heard.

 

Grace: Oh, it’s not as beautiful as 432. 432 definitely looks like a flower.

 

Monika Schaefer: Isn’t that something?

 

Grace: Yeah. Interesting!

 

Monika Schaefer: So, Nightingale, did you want to make a quick final comment? And then we’ll let you go, and I really appreciate that you called in and shared a your story with us. Yes, Nightingale.

 

Grace: Oh, perhaps she’s already gone.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay, so let’s have John in New Hampshire, please. Are you there? Okay, yeah, that’s great! You see, this is such an interesting subject. I find it just fascinating! And the vibrations, the music, and then, of course, this. Go ahead.

 

John: Hello? Am I on?

 

Monika Schaefer: You are on. Is this John?

 

John: Right, right. Okay. Thanks a lot, ladies. That Grace perked me up because when she mentioned Verdi, I was born in the same province as Giuseppe Verdi, Parma. I was very, very happy to hear that. And I’m wondering maybe, hopefully, maybe I can get in touch with her. And I got some interesting stuff.

 

So maybe somehow we can get connected through you, Monika, or through the board. I don’t mean to be rude, but I also would like to see if I could get in touch with Kathleen from Texas. I’ve been trying to get in touch with her, too. So maybe through the board op or something. But if you could call back in, or I could leave my number or something like that.

 

But anyway, yeah, this is a very fascinating conversation. And that, Grace, you’re a pretty amazing, remarkable woman!

 

And, I mean, I love my Italian heritage and I love, … I was born in Parma, but I was only 14 months when I came to this country. But most of my relatives still live in Italy. So maybe we can get in touch or something like that. But anyway. Okay, see what you can do.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay, I’ll just tell you how you can get in touch with me. My email address is posted on RBN. If you go to the host the page where they have my brief bio and that kind of thing. There is a, an email address posted there. Okay. So you could get in touch with me and then I could send your, I’ll get you connected with Grace.

 

John: Okay, I appreciate that. Do you think that would be a good way to get in touch with Kathleen from Texas?

 

Monika Schaefer: I have no idea. You’ll have to perhaps take that up with the producer. [chuckling]

 

John: Okay, great!

 

Monika Schaefer: So, yeah, and if you have a brief comment, final comment, because we have a couple of more callers on the line.

 

John: No, no, no, I’ll go, I’ll defer to them.

 

Monika Schaefer: So if that was John, thank you so much for your call. We have John from California.

 

Another John, are you there?

 

John: Yeah. So 528. I don’t know what, you know, about it. Good frequency or bad frequency?

 

Monika Schaefer: I don’t know. That’s a good question. Grace Eki, do you know, this 528?

 

Grace: I think it’s like you. Continue. I think it’s just a, C higher.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, I don’t know. I think I’ve heard things about it that are actually kind of terrifying about it, but I don’t know. I’m not sure. [chuckling] What do you know, about it, John?

 

John: Yes, well, I don’t know a lot about it. I know that it’s titled. There’s a guest, I won’t use names that comes on this RBN that claims it to be a love frequency. But I’ve heard from others that it’s a not so much.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. This is something we’re gonna have to do some more research on. Maybe the next caller will know. [chuckling]

 

Grace: But let me add that everything has a plus and a minus, the yin and the yang. So something that’s positive in one sense is possible, that it’s very, quite negative in another sense. But I’ve heard of this number. I think it was just, 2056 that you keep on going higher up. But I could be wrong.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay. John, did you have anything like to add?

 

John: Well, yeah, I don’t know a lot about it. Supposedly it’s called Esophageal [sp]. I don’t know if I pronounced it correctly, which was something that was kind of in Rome, they had this thing kind of under wraps for a long time. And supposedly someone got a hold of this following. It’s supposed to come from the Bible and, …

 

Anyway, I just wondered what you knew about it. But thank you very much. Great show.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay. Thank you for your call. Let’s take Chris from Alabama. And we really literally have just, 20 seconds left or so. chris, are you there?

 

Chris: Yeah. Hi, Monika. Sometimes when I have more time. I’m Chris from Alabama. I moved here from California along. I live in California. Born there in 57, married a Canadian woman in 88, and she’s lived in the United States for all this time. We’ve been to Canada many times. British Columbia.

 

Monika Schaefer: Did you have something for our guests?

 

Chris: That book is called The 440 Enigma, and it’s basically trying to blame the 440 frequency on a collaboration between the Rockefellers and the Nazis. And it has a swastika on the cover of it. And like everything else, they want to blame everything on the Nazis! I’m just adding that right now.

 

Monika Schaefer: Ha! Thanks for that. It does sound like we know that they’re lying to us about who are the “Nazis”, quote, unquote, and what they did and all that stuff. So that’s a little bit suspect, isn’t it? And the producer did write in the notes. Maybe it’s The 440 Enigma by LC Vincent.

 

Grace. Do you have a final comment? Just while the music is taking us out?

 

Chris: It’s a pleasure listening to you.

 

Grace: Yes. I wanted to say that, remember that your voice is the free gift of so-called God and nature, an instrument you already have inside and so is your body. And I think it’s in our DNA to love, to dance and sing, and it should help one when one that’s not really so happy. Thank you.

 

Monika Schaefer: Beautiful! Thank you for being my guest, and thank you to all the callers. Thank you very much.

 

Monika Schaefer: And thank you to the producer, too. Awesome job!

 

Grace: Thank you.

 

Monika Schaefer: Keeping everybody straight. Okay, bye bye.

 

[59:01]

[music]

[59:05]

[ad]

[59:59]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

RBN Comments

top

(Comments as of 8/25/2024 = 0)

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 1 – Intro – Jun 29, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 2 – Jul 6, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 03 with Paul Fromm – Jul 13, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 08 with Alfred Schaefer – Aug 17, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 15 with Jürgen Neumann on Ernst Zündel – Oct 12, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

 

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/3/2024 = 94)

 

@baldbull
4 days ago
I never liked him. Him and the Tate brothers should be loaded onto a rocket and fired off towards the sun. Bye!

43
0
Hide replies
wytisryt441
4 days ago
Completely agree

16
0
Nationalist Geographic (Mini-Hyph)
4 days ago
strap me to Syrian Girl and fire me at Tel Aviv.

7
1

@Mcavoy
4 days ago
His account name was always a bit of a clue!

30
0
Hide replies

@dsallen7
4 days ago
Jews are literally a Bronze Age tribe of hate-filled religious fanatics. And they’re also quite perverted.

20
0
Show 2 replies
Nationalist Geographic (Mini-Hyph)
4 days ago
Just got my Talmud signed by BAP.

10
0
ThinRedLine
2 days ago
agreed

3
0
Love of our People
4 days ago
Zog Age Jewvert

28
0
Euroicism
4 days ago
Bap?.. more like bagel.

28
0
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
BArmitzpha Prick

3
0

@UncleVaughn
4 days ago
More importantly, what did BAP do for Hanukkah?

26
0
Florida Man
4 days ago
Imagine having Pervert in your username…on purpose

25
0
Wibble
4 days ago
I had never heard of him….
I wish that was still the case…

21
1
Hide replies

@ironborn
4 days ago
that’s not a qualifier, you dumb fck. People who matter literally cite his shitty book, so it’s important to expose the types that are influencing western white elites, like the jewed up Thiel Network BAP is a part of.

2
9
Hide replies
Wibble
4 days ago
Are you a bot?
You appear to be just typing random words…..

12
1
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
No they have aspergers. I know these types, the crusader types. They’re insufferable and have nothing else going for them in life so they try to police other people within their online sphere. It is what it is, just ignore them, its hard but try.

5
0

@EndJewishPrivilege
4 days ago(edited)
Jews are so subversive. It is entrenched in their DNA. Feminism and MGTOW both serve to lower the White (European) Birthrate, and it comes as no surprise that jews heavily feature in both of these anti-family ‘movements’.

20
2
Hide replies
Love of our People
4 days ago
We Aryans can’t even begin to grasp the perversity of the Jewish mind. They literally work tirelessly to tear down goodness and beauty. I am often amazed at how I came to understand that Hitler far from being the devil I’d believed him to be as a child was actually a champion of the good who went down against all the world’s forces of evil.

14
0
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
keep in mind jews would never have the power and influence they do if it wasnt for the muscle they have; the labour and intellect of whites who, some wittingly and unwittingly, aid jewish causes.

3
0
Æthelwulf of norð hẏmbra land
2 days ago
It’s not a birthrate problem, its a degeneracy problem. You’re all degenerate and could do much better and you know it.

0
3
Hide replies

@EndJewishPrivilege
2 days ago
Me, personally? No, I’m not degenerate- I am and always have been a Relationship Man and Family Man……finding a beautiful woman with pro-White and pro-family values, to fall in love with, have children with and get married to.
I have never believed in sleeping around with random women for the sake of notches on the bedpost; i.e. ‘pump and dump’.
I hardly ever watch p**n (which is promoted by jews).
It is jewry who promote degeneracy…..it is up to the White (European) gentiles to get clued-up to the jews and reject the degeneracy they promote.

1
0
Hide replies
Æthelwulf of norð hẏmbra land
2 days ago
None of this external shit matters right now because the vast ma of everybody is only invested in their personal lives; so that’s all WE can do. The complaint metapolitics is really starting to taper off from it’s peak.

@Quartz14
4 days ago
I learned BAP was Jwish some years ago after reading his book and subscribing to his podcast for several months. Upon learning this I was devastated and cancelled my subscription to gumroad, however about a week later I was victim of a credit card scam involving that very same card, the only person who had those details was me and gumroad (ie BAP), I did this at his recommendation for op-security reasons (ie anonymity). That jw tried to scam me for cancelling the sub, in the end the bank took the hit so it was the happy outcome of jws scamming jws.

18
0
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
i learned he was jewish after october 7th. Mask off.

8
0

@voidincog
4 days ago
every.single.time.

17
0
Earthling Carl
4 days ago
Another subversive Jew…

15
0

@popovacianen
4 days ago
i mean BAP is a jew what did you expect lol

15
0
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
Tate isnt a jew but its the same thing. He’s a mutt, preaching the same message…HANDLED by a jew.

6
0
Nationalist Geographic (Mini-Hyph)
4 days ago
Kept seeing his stuff leak into our circles along with his gay lover raw egg Zionist and got shit for calling it years ago.

1
0
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
Well, because your take is likely wrong. To be honest, the only take nationalists really are razor sharp on, is race. Everything else is just wishful thinking/virgin larp think. Mgtow and manosphere shit arent the same thing yet here I am again seeing the dissident right lump both of them together as the same thing when they’re not.
Mansophere pervs and sex pests like bronze age jew preach pump and dumb shit which is antithesis to what mgtow people do, which is anything not having to do with women, they’ve checked out, they’re not interested in making arguments to defend their existence, they’re out for themselves only, they’re done and for whatever reason that is, whether its being burned bad, whatever…the reason is irrelevant.
The POINT is mgtow or people who do that stuff are not a threat, they’re not allied with anyone, not organized, they do whatever it is they do and are not in the mansophere shit, they hate that shit too, the reason BAP got doxxed is BECAUSE of guys like that, calling him out and destroying his grift, which most of the manosphere is. Nationalists lumping two subgroups together when their ideals are conflicting is low iq retarded hyper online think.
The manosphere shit, the tate and bap shit is what needs kicking down, lumping in guys who got the short end of the stick and just decided to check out instead of going on killing spree or a pump and dump with women, is disingenuous and retarded.
People who decide not to have kids will never be convinced or goaded into doing it, shoving it in their face as a taunt wont work and never has. Attack the manosphere shit which encourages treating women like sex toys and backstabbing other men over poosie, both of which the mgtow camp viscerally hate.
Less

2
0

@Gundobar
4 days ago
Every.Single.Time

12
0
Matt Hammond
4 days ago
I have 2 kids and one on the way and I don’t miss those awful drunk nights out at all.

13
0

@dsallen7
4 days ago
The Ancient Greeks, whom BAP claims to emulate and idolize, looked down on sexual promiscuity and all sexual relations not strictly within marriage and for procreation, as being unmanly.

10
1
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
thats not true. thats just you projecting your slave morality, jewish brain rot abrahamic belief system unto non abrahamic culture which glorified and damn near worshipped the human physique.
Men saw sex as a rite of passage, hard to believe (for u im sure) but it resonates with every normal man on an instinctive level, they just wont admit it outright for fear of social ridicule in this day and age. Roman patricians would get their younger male, 2nd and third inline, to lose their virginity when they became of age either through marriage and/or other means, ie escort or otherwise. Im not glorifying or criticizing those times, I’m stating whats factual. The sooner boys got their curiosity of women out of the way the sooner and better they were able to get on with their actual work/purpose in life.
Men saw sex as right of passage, women saw sex as a means to gain access to resources. So male sexual appetite was encouraged while female sexual appetite was tempered. Do u get it?

1
9
Hide replies

@Thomas
3 days ago
Found the jew

0
1
Hide replies

@What3
2 days ago
found the schizo

@MaybeNextTime
4 days ago
Another lying homosexual jew parasiting off White Civilization.

8
0

@Carlota
4 days ago
It’s not a crime to be out of shape, but it’s ridiculous to brag about being a bodybuilder when in actuality you’re a skinny-fat ghey tribe member.

8
0

@FocusFire
4 days ago
BAP was the most obvious astroturf op I’ve ever seen. Massive respect lost to any of our guys who didn’t immediately see through it. You didn’t even need to know he was a tribe member to know this.

6
0

@chipsnsalsa99
4 days ago
Of course it’s another Jew trying to co-opt a healthy movement. Some things never change.

5
1

@vengeance
4 days ago
Next youre gonna tell me that Hyper-Borean heeb is jewish!!!

5
0
Graham Playing Games
4 days ago
People that pay for sex are scum. Why would you PAY someone? Why wouldn’t you want someone to WANT to be with you just as you want to be with them? You are lesser than someone you are paying because they are desirable and you aren’t – hence paying for them to be with you. Paying for someone to be with you and bragging about it is such a self-own.

3
1
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
imagine idealizing a prostitute above the person paying for them, its akin to treating a pedophile selling cp lighter than the pedophile who bought it from them. You just did it, mark collet did it.
The absolute state of the dissident right. If this is what jews are up against, the only thing that will be the undoing of jews, is their own behavior, not the reaction or pushback from any outside group. October 7th proved this. The dissident right are impotent for the most part, spectators.

1
1
Hide replies
Graham Playing Games
3 days ago(edited)
It’s that the people paying have to pay the person that is desirable. If the person paying was desired, they wouldn’t be paying. Who has the power in that situation? Who is on top, actually?
You shouldn’t pay someone – you should be desired just as you desire the other person. Boys shouldn’t be told they are so worthless and not wanted that they have to pay someone for affection. Women like men, too. Boys should be taught to be the best they can and that they also are desired.

1
0
Hide replies

@What3
2 days ago
Wow, you’re still trying to do mental gymnastics about it :/

Hide replies
Graham Playing Games
2 days ago
It’s not mental gymnastics. If anyone is doing that, it’s you. The person paying is not desired, the person being paid is desired. But you shouldn’t be in that situation, anyway. You should be in a mutual relationship where both parties are desired sexually.

Hide replies

@What3
2 days ago
It is. The seller and the buyer are scum. You’re joining in in the delusion that one is higher on the pecking order than the other. They’re both scum, just like the person selling child pawn to the person buying it, both scum. I dont want to hear anymore of this nonsense. You people are crazy and dont even know it.

Mr.AG
3 days ago
So basically he is a wanna be andrew tate…

3
0
Nationalist Geographic (Mini-Hyph)
4 days ago
Fitness is good but I always thought that Bap affiliates fixating on looks was pretty gay. Most women will pick a Tony Soprano over a Roided out influencer dork with a Twitter inflated ego.

3
0
Hide replies

@Mcavoy
4 days ago
Tony was just a guy who loved his family!

1
0
Nationalist Geographic (Mini-Hyph)
4 days ago(edited)
I’ve yet to see somebody from the BAP-sphere who hasn’t been exposed as a homosexual, non-white, Jewish, a mischling or a non-white homosexual mischling.

3
0

@Mcavoy
4 days ago(edited)
The revolutionary spirit of Jewish ideology has always been the enemy of our civilisation. However, I think it is a bit sad that Mark talks about Christmas only in terms of gift giving and family gatherings.
Our ancestors celebrated the solstice, as a moment when every day that followed arrived with more daylight. For primitive agricultural communities, this was a sign of hope.
But that aboriginal faith system was superseded by a more sophisticated metaphysical interpretation of our relationship with creation. Nobody really knows when Jesus was born but the early Christians began to celebrate the astrophysical equinox, by exulting a moment when God became man.
As extraordinary as this sounds, it founded our civilisation and the beginning of an identity that went far beyond tribal loyalty. We were in fact, the design of a single creator and unlike the rest of nature, had been provided with a conscience to question, explore and understand our purpose in the universe.
That is what Christmas is about and the simple pleasure of eating, gifting and having fun are primarily meant to enable children to enjoy the event. The Jews hate Christmas, because it signalled the end of what they considered to be a special relationship with God. For 2000 years they have plotted their revenge on our civilisation and BAP is just another representation of their malevolence. The best and only way to defeat the Jews, is to return to the shield of Christian faith that protected us from their hatred for centuries.
Our society is filled with troubles and in presentation, lacks any sort of spiritual consolation. The times I spend in Church, on my own or with a congregation, are some of the few moments during a week I feel true peace. Fuentes has joked that the Jews can’t follow you there, as they’d burst into flames as they cross the threshold!
Try to visit your local church sometime, just to see if you are calmer when you leave than when you arrived. It’s a harmless experiment!
Less

5
3
Hide replies

@Quartz14
4 days ago
Yes very good. The solstice is actually something that can be seen with your eyes, the process I mean, it is not a metaphysical event its an ACTUAL event. The Sun reaches its lowest point in the sky on the 22nd December and remains there for 3 days. At night at this part of the sky is the southern cross constellation. After 3 days the Sun rises again 1 degree and is “reborn”. Hence the Sun dies on the cross and is resurrected. Jesus was not a real man, he is a character or vehicle by which to tell the story in a way that is understood by the profane, much like Horus or Hermes Trismegstus etc. The spring equinox also is the point at which the day becomes longer than night, it is the point in the year where the Sun defeats the darkness (Seth, Saturn/Satan), the light defeats the dark. That is why it is celebrated, though obviously in a confused way. In Christianity the Suns rebirth is celebrated in Winter Solstice, which is actually when the Sun is reborn (25th December), but its death and resurrection is celebrated in the spring when light defeats darkness. Obviously 99.9% of Christians have no idea.
Christianity is a pagan religion, there is more to it than even that but I will leave it there. I enjoyed your comment and much of it is spot on.
Less

1
4
Hide replies

@Mcavoy
4 days ago
Many people, mostly Jews, have been trying to deconstruct Christianity since Jesus died on the cross. He did have a physical existence and this is recorded in historical accounts. The horrible martyrdom of many of his closest followers, is also a matter of historical fact and in all of recorded human experience, their attestments represent an extraordinary self-sacrifice. What ever happened that caused them to give their lives so willingly, could only have resulted from a series of exceptional charismatic events.
Unlike aboriginal (pagan) faith systems based on observable phenomena, Christianity is almost entirely metaphysical. This requires a far more sophisticated intellectual curiosity to arrive at logical conclusions. The Greeks tried to rationalise the process but failed, because they could not explain why a supernatural force should have any interest in the minds of individuals, us.
The bridge between Greek logic and God’s communication with the Hebrew people, is the Koine term Logos. This does not translate well into English but can mean “words”, which by their nature, are metaphysical tools to explain substance. The best example of this is Saint John’s prologue to his gospel, 1:1.
If you understand any of that, you are on the same journey as me. I’m a nationalist because in principle, nationalism respects the natural order of the universe. The Jews and their social engineering project, to mush the people of the world into one servile class of passive consumers beneath them, is the reason why they cause chaos. But above everything, we must follow the moral law and that is defined by acceptance of a higher authority, both outside of us and more importantly, inside us.
Btw, I don’t know what you mean by referring to the Southern Cross. This is not visible in the Northern hemisphere where Christianity was founded, so the ancient astrologers were unaware of its existence. Maybe you need to improve your understanding of astronomy, as well as theology.
Less

Hide replies

@Quartz14
4 days ago
Fine I will go further for your benefit.
Rome was a pagan civilisation, its people worshiped the pantheon, specifically Jupiter at the head, Saturn, Mercury, Venus, Mars – these were the Gods. Astrology was a large part of this belief, and was inhereited from Greece, who inherited from the Egyptians and Babylonians. Jupiter in astrology is the God of expansion, understanding and forgiveness, he was the head of the Roman religion. He is mighty in battle and his symbol is the eagle – the holy symbol carried by the roman legions and famously defended and revered with religious zeal. As governor of expansion, Jupiter is responsible for the fermentation of wine and the rising of bread (fermentation). He is ruler of the zodiac sign Pisces in which age we have lived since the year 0AD. The term for the planetary ruler of a sign is “anointed” or “Messiah”. Pisces is the twin fish, the fish being an early christian symbol of course. It is said in the bible the Jesus feeds the 5000 with bread (Jupiter) and 2 fish (Pisces). It is said that Jesus turns water into wine (fermentation). It is said that the disciples of Jesus were all “Fishermen”, and the men of the old testament, written in the age of Aries (The Ram) were called “Shepherds”. This is a coincidence I am sure.
Do I need to put this together for you?
You are correct regarding the southern cross not being visible today in the northern hemisphere, yet it is true. I have seen the winter solstice twice within 12 months having spent half in the north and half in the south of this world, I missed summer that year but I learned a great deal about the nature of reality, and of religious history. Christianity is not the only monotheistic cult worshipping a single God of the pantheon, Jews worship Saturn, Muslims worship Venus, Buddhists (a cult of pagan Hinduism) worship Mercury, the word for the planet Mercury in sanskrit is “Budha”. I will leave you to your delusions.
Less

Hide replies

@Mcavoy
2 days ago(edited)
At least you gave up trying to claim that Jesus did not exist and now accept the historical records about him and the apostles, this is progress. You also agree that the Southern Cross can never be observed in the Northern hemisphere above the 25th parallel, so we are off to the races!
I strongly suspect you have never encountered the concept of logos before. This is not surprising as I attended Catholic schools for twelve years and it was never mentioned but it is the key to understanding why Christianity became the basis of our civilisation. The Greek philosophers struggled with the concept of existence and the failure to resolve the internal contradictions of their mythology was catastrophic for their spiritual survival. The Romans failed in the same way. Nobody now believes in their religion.
The Hebrew people understood that a single God spoke directly to them. It was a physical revelation and the world could never be the same again. That relationship resulted in the Ten Commandments, which to this day, instruct us on the moral law of our creator. Whether you think it is delusional or not, in your heart you know the difference between living in harmony with God’s nature and the consequences of transgression.
Our civilisation was built on the foundational principles of Christianity, the contribution of the Pagans was to lay out the roads and they all lead to Rome. As our society becomes more deracinated, it loses its purpose. If there is no God, then people imagine they can do as they please, which seems to be your philosophy. The Europeans have lost their way before but there will be a spiritual revival, as people dissent against the idea that science can explain everything. When more realise how much the scientists conspired with the ruling class to impose the Covid hoax against us, there will be a true reckoning.
Dr Jones explains Logos below. This is what helped me to find a better way. Maybe you, too.
odysee.com/god-allows-evil-to-bring-about-good:4
Less

Hide replies

@Quartz14
2 days ago
Now you are putting words into my mouth. Jesus did not exist. History is a series of lies agreed upon, there are no credible records of Jesus Christ, just as 8 nations claim to be the birth place of Hermes Trismegestus – there was no Hermes. The stories about both of these charecters use them as a vehicle to pass on a message – it is allegory. Water to wine. Bread and fish. Healing the sick with miracles (Hermes did this first). Death and resurrection after 3 days (winter solstice – Horus and Dionysus achieved this miracle long before Jesus). Even his birth is called “the Nativity” which is the astrological term for “position of the stars at birth”.
You are telling me you were brainwashed at Catholic school. Logos yes, I understand you are a person of the mind – I am a practical astronomer and astrologer and see the world with my eyes not my thought (Thoth). At least neither of us are a “person of the book” like the Jews and the Protestants who believe God wrote the bible and take everything in this life “literally”. They are people of the mind also, and it is evident since Eienstein and the jewish take over of science for their own ends that progress in the philosophy of creation has stagnated. We have advanced no where in our understanding in over 100 years thanks to their lies. They have Quantum recipes that work and can create high technology, yet there is ZERO understanding of why, and they admit this themselves. They make up new nonsense about dark matter, string theories and black holes that no one has ever seen (ie they do not exist), instead of looking to the world for answers. God is everywhere, you just need to see. Yet you prefer logos to practical observation of God through his creation. When I look through my telescope I am seeing aspects of the creator. When I engage in conversation with you, I am speaking directly to a facet of God. The planets are facets of him, but not Gods themselves, just as we are facets of creation, but not the creator.
Less

Hide replies

@Mcavoy
1 day ago
It is very hard to take somebody seriously, when they reject the evidence of objective reality. Almost every significant academic scholar of antiquity, whether pro or anti Christianity, accepts that Jesus of Nazareth existed. You would be on slightly firmer ground, if you contested what happened during his life. Total rejection that he lived and no doubt, the attestments of the apostles, places you in a fractional minority of belligerent Christophobes. Even Dawkins and the Jews accept that Jesus existed!
Yes, I went to a Catholic school and left as a confirmed atheist, so the brainwashing did not work and my study of theology developed afterwards. My teachers never explained the natural symmetry of Logos and I doubt that you heard about the concept, before you commented on my post. I provided a link to a 15 minute explanation of the principles. You might be interested in the part where Dr Jones explains how Logos enables us to study astronomy, to understand our place God’s creation.
Claiming that God is everywhere and therefore unintelligible, is a cope used to ignore his clear instructions. The enemies of Logos promote that type of nihilistic propaganda, to deracinate people from the collective faith that created our civilisation. See the Book of Jeremiah
29:13
Less

Hide replies

@Quartz14
1 day ago
“Almost every significant academic scholar of antiquity…” – this is not evidence of objective reality, that is called an appeal to authority. There are many scholars who said Jesus never existed, both ancient and contemporary, you just think yours are better. Jesus obvious never lived, he is at best a Hermes Trismegstus figure who was likely several people (at best), but more likely due to how the ancients told their stories, he is a charecter to carry a message. The story is the medium through which allegory carries knowledge. Kane and Able were not real, they are story telling mechanism. Rumple stiltskin is not a real person, he is an allegory for the Jews. The Jews say Jesus exists because they want you to believe your lord and saviour was a Jew LOL. That is another bullshit lie, pushed by the jewish supremacists like Adam Green, and it benefits only the jews and israel. And you call yourself a Catholic!
Father – Son – Holy Ghost is a direct astrological reference – JUPITER (father) – SUN (Gods Sun) – MOON (spirit).
I am the light and the life. I am the light of the world. I will be with you always, until the ending of the age (of Pisces). All true, all allegory for the mechanisms of the creator. Let us make man in OUR image, plural.
I did not say God is everywhere, I said we are all FACETS of God, like looking at a single face of a gemstone, you see a part of the whole. Each planet is a facet – Mars is glory, anger, violence, wrath, honor. Venus is beauty, friendship, love, lust. Mercury is thought (THOTH in Egypt, Hermes in Greece), intellect, ideas. Jupiter is justice, growth, understanding, forgiveness. Saturn is restriction, limitation, boundaries and death. All men are made in the image of the planets – they each carry a facet of the planets, the Gods – but they are not Gods themselves. Just as the Gods are not the creator, though they each represent a facet of him. As above, so below. Psalm 82. Though Psalm 90 is my favorite. All the best.
Less

Hide replies

@Mcavoy
19 hours ago
You have previously demonstrated that you don’t understand how basic astronomy works. Now you have proved that you don’t understand how to use logical fallacies to support an argument. The appeal to authority fallacy is only valid, when the authority cited is unqualified to provide an expert opinion. For brevity, I did not see a requirement to name the academic sources who accept that Jesus was a historical figure, because the evidence is so overwhelming. It is embarrassing for you to dispute reality, whilst hiding behind the ridiculous crank fiction of astrology.
The reason why I wrote my original post was to point out a tragic omission in Mark’s video. I admire him but there is a spiritual void at the core of ethno-nationalism, which cannot be overlooked. He is trying to build PA as a nationalist community but the greatest community we ever had, still exists as the Christian church. Not unlike the rest of our society, it may be hollowed out and a shadow of its former glory but that’s because moral people chose to say nothing. “Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Who said that?
I’d like to see Mark and other leaders be as brave as Candace Owens and say out loud: “Christ is King!”. This would directly oppose Jewish corruption, heathens and cranks, by restoring Logos as the driving force to protect our civilisation, which it did successfully, for more than 1000 years.
Did you watch Dr Jones’ explanation of Logos? It is only 15 minutes long and helped me to understand the true nature of ultimate reality. Here it is, again.
odysee.com/god-allows-evil-to-bring-about-good:4
Less

Hide replies

@Quartz14
15 hours ago
Where did I demonstrate I don’t understand astrology? I said you can’t see the southern cross TODAY, ie it was once visible in the northern hemisphere as the Egyptians say it was, and today still the Sun hangs on the cross at 35 degrees latitude. You think because the bible story was written 2000 years ago there was no astronomy before that? There were no stars in the sky before 0AD? That the sky was always as it is now for thousands of years?
Jesus was born long before your bible was, he had many names, Horus, Dionysus, Apollo. I am wasting my time with you though I see, you are not a reasonable person. You attempt petty insults and appeal directly to your sources (appeal to authority) knowing full well there are others who disagree with you – or perhaps you don’t? Then at least you are just honest and stupid. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you are indeed stupid, and like most people you have nothing to offer but appealing to the work of others. Midwit is the term. Yes yes I have seen Jones work years ago, it is a joke. I am not wasting my time on him and his jew worship again.
Less

@Quartz14
1 day ago
Actually psalm 107 is also extremely good. Atb.

lambchops
3 days ago
Every. Single. Time.

2
0
Fancy
4 days ago
Shitty clip dick jewish genetics OY VEY!

2
0
Fancy
4 days ago(edited)
Dont know the guy thank fuk. Seems like a red pill all girls are sluts cash for sex jewish tate clone.That got hurt once probably as a teen and never got over it. All this shows is he is mentality weak. He needs to get over it or he will be a very lonely OAP.
And if that is his photo then ,fitness ,bodybuilding WTF

2
0
Winter Phoenix F K
7 hours ago
Mark, you SLEW him with that ending!

1
0
Witch Hunter Siegfried
4 days ago
Also, the “Bronze Age Mindset” shit I’d bet was ripped off Golden One’s “Demigod Mind” given it’s literally about wanting to be seen as a demigod, difference is Golden One is White lmao.

0
1
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
Nah, you’re stupid. Golden One doesnt preach pump and dumb sex pest nonsense. This isnt even apples and oranges you’re comparing, more like apples and something thats not even edible.

@What3
4 days ago

@MarkCollett
mgtow isnt a warped mirror image if feminism. They arent going their own way, they are sent their own way, weather its by women who bought the jewish narratives or other men(like u, no offense) clowning on them for w.e. reason, wether its a strawman of them ur putting out there or same pump and dump shit that jew pervert u said pushes.
Mgtow people dont rly want anything to do with women, ever. They just do their own shit and want to be left the hell alone, not lumped in together with people like bronze age pervert(manosphere fools). The reasons for this are ALL reasonable; wether its they got burned by women, by the deeds of other men they thought had their back over some woman or even maternal issues, growning up with one of the same feminist mothers you talked about.
Mgtow people arent out here or online preaching mgtow, holding conferences, having political organizations etc. They’re the guys who gave up on women, so they want nothing to do with them, which is ANTITHESIS to the pump and dump shit redpill manosphere pushes.
You, mark, and a lot of these dissident virgin spergs, are doing the same thing, jews have done to anyone who criticizes their behaviour; Lump them all together as hostile. Mgtow people hate manosophere redpill fools like bronze age pervert who are poosie fanatics. They just want to be left alone and not demonized, thats it, a simple ask. Theyr’e a non threat. Masophere shit is a threat, go after that and stop kicking horses who are down and out.
Less

2
5
Hide replies
Black Pilled Monkeh
4 days ago
Sure, Jan.

Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
why are u being such a cunt?

2
2
Hide replies
Black Pilled Monkeh
4 days ago
Because you’re laughably wrong and almost all your comments are ghae and retarded.

1
0
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
You spelled gay wrong, retard. And they’re not, the fact that no one wants to bother with a rebuttal other than one which contains bad spelling, fortifies my point.

0
1
Hide replies
Black Pilled Monkeh
4 days ago
I spelled gay “ghae” in the mocking online jargon way, you internet illiterate.
And I’m not fetching my encyclopedia of mgtow misfits for an internet crusader like you, because I realized MGTOW was a jewish cop-out years and years ago.
I understand that the type of man to be attracted to MGTOW are men who have been burned. I respect that. I empathize with the poor bastards who got divorce-raped by a heartless ex, their wife of many years abandoning the family, men falsely accused of rape, men who were raised by abusive mothers, and those who despair in the face of today’s abysmal dating prospects. I get it.
Yet the path to healing is fixing the bridge between the sexes, prioritizing the family, and taking down the jewish tyrants. Not mgtow.
MGTOW promotes abandoning women and relationships, and while there are indeed mgtow monks there are absolutely mgtow who promote pump and dump.
Not to mention the many, many nonwhite mgtow leaders who not only pump and dump, but who BRAG about cucking White men and grooming White women. (I forget his name, but one bearded Turk comes to mind, and that was way back in like 2014. And as far as I’m aware, Tate had mgtow fans).
I might have politely argued against your mgtow comment, if it weren’t for the fact that I’ve seen you under countless proWhite videos countersignalling/undermining our people.
Less

2
0
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
Internet illiterate? No, hyper online. Thats the phrase, dont flatter yourself.
Mgtow doesnt promote abandoning women, read my very first post, jan. They dont promote anything, they were SENT their own way. Its all in my first post which you admittedly mockingly replied to instead of addressing the points, which u did in this comment in half assed way by cherry picking points u think you can strawman.

0
1
Hide replies
Black Pilled Monkeh
4 days ago
Cherry picking? Strawman? Lol, okay man. Go your own way now.

1
0
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago(edited)
Thank you for fortifying my point and yes and I’ve seen you under countless pro white videos also, having bad takes and good, what’s your point schizo? That im hasbara? No, if i were jewish I’d do what jews have always been doing to the dissident right; ignoring them because we cant get our shit together. Simple as.
Also I can coutnersignal whatever the pppppppppppppppphuck i want and theres nothing u can do or say to stop me lol. If i ruffle feathers, so be it. Lets have an exchange, or just slime and move on but I’ll say what I say based on evidence that is not ANCEDOTAL but frequently occurring within any given subgroup. I dont cherry pick, which is what you seem to pride yourself on by lurking in mgtow mutt channels/groups who call themselves such and picking out the one bad apple to paint the whole group.
Every man that wants nothing to do with women, were sent their own way, its not a choice they made, it was made for them through circumstances beyond their control. What I noticed in the dissident right is that their problems are downplayed or dismissed unless it is one which can fortify nationalists points. Much like how the media ignores certain stories if its black on white crime and upsells stories if the races are swapped.
Less

0
1
Kestrel.Falcons
4 days ago
bunch of grifters all you.

3
18
Hide replies
TheCeltDenise
4 days ago
LOL Is that the best ya got?

11
2
Talmudvision Zogberg
4 days ago
An absolutely pointless video about another easily spotted subversive. What’s with all these online White nationalists disabling the the downvote? It’s weak and pro censorship.

6
21
Hide replies
TheCeltDenise
4 days ago
Report to the Oven, Schlomo

14
2
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
dumb bitch lol

3
2

@What3
4 days ago
Its not pointless tho but I see where you’re coming from. As if to say people(normal people) actually know who bronze age pervert is, tate sure but not this jew, tate is also handled by a jew btw but tate is way more famous because he has money and social capital so i see dissidents going after him as making sense.
This pervert fella who literally had a meltdown after october 7th after pushing war bride doctrine shit for so long was the final nail in the coffin, all of his doing, no need for anyone to point that loser out, hes irrelevant and clowning on him will just give him a victim status/narrative to push, which jews love to revel in, their whole religion and that of the other abrahamic ones rely on this for self worth.

1
1
Kermie
4 days ago
100% agree on the downvote thing. Just because a few faggots downvote every post is not a reason to eliminate their opportunity… more a vehicle to expose them.
100% disagree on the validity of this video’s purpose. Today I can spot a subversive from a mile away. 10-15 years ago, I could not spot that same person. This video is for the person in that position.

3
1
HydraulicHydra
1 day ago
Satan is calling for him.

HydraulicHydra
1 day ago
A lot of the MGTOW crowd have a similar argument: “Live life for yourself and let your country, your race, and your relationship with God go to hell.” Yes, the modern dating and relationship scene is [a word that is apparently blocked lol] in the ass but the only way it, and life in general are going to get better is for good people to take a stand.

GusinLanzarote Alt Right
2 days ago
is this guy a creep- yes but WHO is more of a demographic threat a childless lonely jew hiring prossies on Xmas day OR a Black who impregnates numerous White females runs off then expects the state to raise themIts easy to have a go at Incels but WHY do they exist because feminism made every Average 7/10 female believe she has the Right to a perfect 9/10 handsome rich Alpha there were No incels in 1824. And yes Jews are over represented in feminism but so are Lesbians / LGBT mafia. So a far better strategy for nationalists would be to end feminism rather than worrying about how many jews were in itOf course the anonymous avatar boys will slime my comment to death – but whilst you obsess on childless lonely jews a population EXPLOSION in África will breed out your race Disraeli was a jew but Id prefer his Britain to today’s Anytime

Taciturn
3 days ago(edited)
I’ve always disliked Nietzscheans. Nietzsche was a faggot. If not literally, then spiritually.

Hide replies
GusinLanzarote Alt Right
1 day ago
Dont you feel a bit sorry for Nietzsche? going mad seeing that being flogged in Turin & spending years in a loony bin As we saw with legend Bowden those beqiethed the gift of Genius often get the burden of mental turmoil thrown in with it

Hide replies
Taciturn
1 day ago(edited)
I don’t think it’s the crazy though. Bowden was a gentleman and a scholar, whereas Nietzsche routinely makes me want to bully him for being a loser. This is just my grug brain reaction to him, though.

1
0
spqr
3 days ago
expel and ban them forever, take the countries back and seal it this time in the Constitution

Pure
3 days ago
Wasnt there an expose on raw egg nationalist too, or are they the same character or something ? I dont know but if its so that raw egg nationalist is same kind of scam like bap, they should be ashamed to put nationalist in their name and delete that from their name. Replacing raw egg nationalist with something like raw egg liar or raw egg egomaniac. That i would be ok with.

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

Mark Collett – Book Review – The Host and the Parasite by Greg Felton – Jul 6, 2021 — Transcript

Mark Collett – Book Review – Reactionary Modernism – Jonathan Bowden – May 30, 2022 – Transcript

Mark Collett – Book Review – Hammer of the Patriot – Jun 27, 2022 – Transcript

Mark Collett – Book Review – The Culture of Critique – Nov 28, 2022 – Transcript

Mark Collett – Book Review – The Camp of the Saints – Jan 30, 2023 – Transcript

Mark Collett – Book Review – The Myth of German Villainy – Apr 28, 2024 – Transcript

Mark Collett – Book Review – Equal Training – Jun 30, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

 

Joel Davis: We are live.

 

Another show. It is the 20th of June, 2024.

 

Another evening in racism for all of our Australian friends and a morning in racism for our American friends. And that we do have a lot of American viewers, but this is a show about Australian politics usually, and we’ll be talking about things very Australian this evening. The three of us attended quite an interesting event last night. We’re going to probably spend a lot of time talking about that.

 

But before we get into that subject, I guess it would be customary to do a little bit of small talk while people fill up the chat and so on.

 

So do you have any irritations, Blair, to report on what has been grinding your gears over the past week? Because usually you come up with funny little things to be annoyed by and it can be quite humorous.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, yeah, I’m a king of small talk. Speaking of small talk, though, we’re not going to be reading out most Superchats during the stream this time or this week because after I did that last week, I had an avalanche of complaints saying:

 

“Blair, you’re interrupting the flow of the conversation!”

 

I’m like, fuck!

 

All right, so we’ll do Superchats at the end, unless, look, it’s going to be at my discretion.

 

Joel Davis: Do it at breaks in topics, I think. Yeah, I think it was a break in a topic. It’s all right.

 

But yeah, don’t interrupt yourself, or a subject to interject with it because usually Superchats, quite frivolous.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

But like I said, it’ll be at my discretion.

 

So if I see one that I really do want to include in the conversation, I’ll do it.

 

Joel Davis: If you send a good Superchat that’s actually relevant to what’s being discussed, then, yeah, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: If it’s relevant, I think it should be mentioned on the spot. But if it’s like:

 

“What’s your favorite Claude Van Damme movie?”

 

Then maybe at the end.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I’ve been thinking a lot about the event we went to be honest, and I’ve been thinking about what happened there, just interpreting everything, trying to come to a conclusion about it.

 

So, look, I haven’t really got it in me to be ranting too much about anything frivolous. We can do that. As the show progresses, I’m sure something’s going to come to mind, something that irritates me.

 

Joel Davis: I feel like. I think the people at home have noticed, like, Blair has changed. We’ve gone into a new phase of Blair ever since, particularly the laptop. You just seem so much more energised about nationalism and politics.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s you guys. It’s the audience as well. We get so much engagement on this. And you, Joel, you got a positive attitude. Tom’s always fighting. Everyone’s always positive. It’s just white pilled me, man. I gotta say. It’s white pilled me. It’s brought me back. So thanks, guys. You’ve brought me back. Your energy, your support, it’s got me believing again.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s real.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s real.

 

Thomas Sewell: Cause I know you, and that’s real. I don’t know if the audience wouldn’t know how real that is the audience would be like, yeah, like, Blair kind of dropped off a little bit, kind of had a break, or kind of was like focused on Covid, and people would be like:

 

“Oh, now he’s back.”

 

But they don’t know, like, because when you’re someone’s friend, you can feel what they. What they’re feeling. You have that empathy going through upf and how bright you’ve burned. Like, you were just this charging Aryan fire of this Germanic, Celtic youth spirit of the country and that. No one ever talks about how much energy that actually requires. You know what I mean? Like people think all players just built like.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like that.

 

Thomas Sewell: He’s just built like that it’s like:

 

“Well, yeah, he is, because, …”

 

Blair Cottrell: He can do it, but only no.

 

Thomas Sewell: One really, energy that actually your whole life force, your whole life energy was like hundred percent. Like, people don’t realize what a hundred percent dedication is unless they saw you for that 18 month or two year period. Yeah, it was like a sprint. It was like an uphill sprint for almost two years straight.

 

Blair Cottrell: And I loved it! I loved one of our old supporters who Tom. He was at this event we attended last night. And I had him on camera, actually I posted some footage earlier today. He asked me, do. Do you miss it, Blair? Do you miss the activism? And I honestly answered, yes.

 

There’s nothing about it that I miss so much as the struggle, the fights, constantly, every day, having more to do, more content to make, more to promote, more to organize, more to show up to. Look, I am back. I’m still back from the standpoints that I’m going to provide a sort of median level of commentary. You know, I’m going to create a pipeline. You know what I’m like, right? I want to keep it clean and I want to observe. That’s what I’m back to do more than anything. Just observe and contribute where necessary.

 

But, yeah, thanks, everyone, for your support. And I want to get right into this event that happened last night because.

 

Joel Davis: I want to make one brief comment on what you said.

 

I think it’s very important to meditate on the notion that fighting is funnier than winning, that the struggle is actually more enjoyable than the victory. This is what Nietzsche was getting at with this concept of the “will to power” and “to love one’s fate” and so on.

 

And his philosophy was this insight that actually the struggle is what is most enjoyable, the process. And that sometimes the worst thing that can ever happen to you is to achieve something, and then you don’t know what to do next.

 

And so it’s so important to have something that you’re actually fighting for with your life so that you can actually be enjoyable. Nothing else is more enjoyable than taking it to the enemy on a daily basis and feeling like everything that you’re doing is imbued with meaning and purpose.

 

And I think from observing you, from meeting you a year and a half ago, a bit longer now to now, and seeing just kind of being your friend for that period of time, what I noticed was, I think you got really demoralized by Covid. But what seemed to demoralize you even prior to that, was just like the way that the state came after you and your previous projects fell apart. And this sense of the movement basically entering into a phase where it was no longer on upward trajectory.

 

I mean, Tom was doing his thing with his organization, but Tom was then in jail for ages. And after the Brenton Tarrant* shooting and the way that the state cracked down upon the movement and the media, basically locked everybody out. It was a time when you could actually be part of the public conversation.

 

[* The Christchurch mosque shootings were two consecutive mass shootings on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand on 15 March 2019. They were committed by Brenton Tarrant who entered both mosques during Friday prayer, firstly at the Al Noor Mosque at 1:40 pm and later at the Linwood Islamic Centre at 1:52 pm Tarrant was arrested after his vehicle was rammed by a police unit as he was driving to a third mosque in Ashburton. Source: Wikipedia]

 

Then you were locked out, you dragged through the courts on bullshit charges. People, I’m sure, know the story, but the point is that all of that really worked quite successfully and all the de-platforming and so on, it worked quite successfully to completely destroy what you were doing.

 

And then, you know, it seemed like you were. I don’t mean like lost in life, but you didn’t have that same reason to get up every morning that you did for a few years, you had reasons to get up, but it wasn’t quite the same. Like, you weren’t on a mission, you went on a quest for the Grail, and, like, every day there’s things coming at you and you’re batting off enemies and trying to, like, force things into being and, well, it’s interesting to.

 

Blair Cottrell: Get that outside perspective of what it seemed like someone just dropped something.

 

But look, I’m kind of getting used to where everything’s at in terms of tempo, what kind of content I should be creating, where I should be, when I should be there. Things have changed, you know, things have changed since I’ve actually wanted to influence people or to provide a positive influence in the community. I’ve always denied my humanity.

 

I don’t know if you guys can relate to this, or maybe the audience can. I’ve always thought I don’t need to do everything that every other human needs to do. I think I’ve spoken about this on the stream once before, but in a different subject matter and in a different way.

 

What I mean is, I used to think to myself, I don’t need to believe in anything. I don’t need to serve any purpose. I’m not weak enough to have to believe in something. That’s a human weakness. I’m going to transcend that.

 

But I don’t think it is a weakness to need to believe in something. Because believing in something is what gives you the energy, the motivation, the dedication to dedicate yourself entirely to something that you feel is important, that you feel is greater than yourself. And honestly, what is there that’s more important than your nation, your extended ethnic community and its continued existence? You know that is just like the precipice that is the peak of all things that could be important in my mind. And anyone who tries to tell me I’m evil for believing that, like, cheque yourself. Because why am I evil for wanting to protect and promote my own ethnic community group? Right?

 

Joel Davis: Well, is that off? Hitler said, the most precious thing in this world is your people. And that’s one of the truest things the great man ever said. I do want to read out a Superchat. I’m going to break the rules because White Power said:

 

“Joel, why did you slander Gigachad Mussolini?”

 

This is referring to, I guess, a Twitter comment that I left underneath a sun and radical edit. And it was this really incredible sun and rat edit.

 

I might actually pull it up and play it for you guys a bit later at the end of the show. Maybe we can analyse it, but it’s just got ancient Rome stuff mixed with Hitler stuff and it’s cool song. It’s like a funk remix of Seven Nation Army by the White Stripes.

 

And then at the end, they put a couple, like, Mussolini clips in, and I said:

 

“I’m gonna rate it nine out of ten. It was ten out of ten.”

 

And then this Mussolini. And I like Mussolini, but he’s not Hitler. You know, there’s levels. There’s levels to this. And people took it as me hating on Mussolini and saying that he’s not White and Italians aren’t White and so on.

 

[10:24]

 

Blair Cottrell: Tell us one, tell us one good thing. Tell us one great thing about Mussolini and one thing that’s really not so good, because I don’t even know much about Mussolini.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, obviously Mussolini was a great, like, he’s an incredible political innovator. I mean, he invented fascism. Uh, the way in which they, he orchestrated his political movement. It was incredible!

 

I mean, there’s a lot to respect about him. The demeanour of the guy. He’s got this kind of energy that’s just quite humorous. He’s just got that bravado, this really excessive, cartoonish bravado, but it’s very endearing.

 

The thing that I like least about Mussolini is that basically the fascist movement, while it was cool in so many respects, I’m not saying that I don’t like fascism, but it did lack the centrality of race that National Socialism had or that I would personally put within my politics. And I can understand why. Because in Italy, there wasn’t, like one cohesive, central ethnic identity. You know, northern Italian, southern Italians are quite different.

 

And so there was a sense that fixating too much upon race would alienate, you know, one half of the country from the other, differentiate them. And the whole idea was coming together in the unity of Italy.

 

But I think that that’s problematic. I think maybe if you have a country that’s built around such a large racial difference maybe that’s an incorrect way to design a country.

 

But there was a greater emphasis upon state power.

 

And while I do agree that authoritarian state power is something that should be used for good and can be used for good, I don’t think it is the be all and end all. It’s about what it’s being used for.

 

Whereas fascism kind of gives this notion that state power is kind of an end in itself, that just like, the centralization of the will in the state is itself just a grand thing. And I don’t think that’s necessarily the case. I mean, also, the Italian fascists were kind of soft on the jews. They did get harsher on the jews toward the end when they were trying to cosy up to the Germans.

 

Because you have to understand as well, the fascists and the Germans only became allies only a few years before the war. Mussolini was trying to ally himself with the Brits and with the French. To be fair, he was actually trying to bring everyone together in Europe and create a pan-European alliance against the Soviet Union and other non-European countries, which I think was a good idea. I think Mussolini was right to try and do that it’s a shame that he didn’t pull it off, but it was complex.

 

Like, people kind of see fascism and National Socialism as exactly the same thing in this one unified movement, but that actually is ahistorical. And Mussolini was seen in a positive light by European jewry and other European elements that were quite against the National Socialists in the early 1930s as, like, a positive alternative or something that wasn’t so racist and anti-semitic and so on.

 

So I think that says a lot, but that doesn’t mean that I hate Mussolini or I have zero respect for Mussolini. No, I think fascism has no cool ideas. It does. It was obviously a movement of the Right. It was a movement that was against communism.

 

So obviously that makes it fundamentally good. Anything that destroys communism is good, and it had many good elements. And it wasn’t like they were totally. They weren’t like, opening the borders, the brown and black immigrants or anything.

 

So it wasn’t like they were totally, like, cucked on race to some totally unacceptable degree without destroying their, like, what’s happening now to Italy and the rest of other Western countries.

 

So, it’s a nuanced thing.

 

It’s like I don’t hate fascism or Mussolini, but also I don’t revere them as highly as I or him or revere the fascist Italian state as highly as I revere other things.

 

But anyway, we managed to do a little bit of small talk, so I succeeded.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s Joel’s version of small talk, guys. That’s what we deal with down here in Melbourne. So, like I said, though, I’d like to jump onto talking about the event that happened last night. All three of us were there. What did you guys think?

 

Joel Davis: I’ll let Tom go first.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I do you plan on uploading the interview you did with me, just out of curiosity? It depends on how I answer the question, because I won’t double up on that if you’re going to., …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I won’t probably get it up until after the weekend because I am travelling up to Brisbane, well, just below Brisbane tomorrow morning. I’ve had work today. I only had time to get that little quick clip up. And my intention with that clip was just to., … It’s the same every time. I’d make content in the past as well, to normalize the people who are in attendance, because they’re going to be slandered eventually as Right-wing crack, far-Right neo-Nazi conspiracy theorists, just to show that it’s regular working people that go.

 

But more than anything, that there are people who attend events like this in quite large numbers, that it’s not something that’s niche and fringe and only a few people are sitting around a table. There’s hundreds of people that are interested in these things, in these talking points, and I think it’s really important to get that across to anyone who’s interested, because I think what holds people back from participating in politics like this is they think that no one else is doing it.

 

So it’s really important, I think, just to get those visual messages out there to help everyone understand that there’s a lot of people who care about their country, there’s a lot of people who want to do something about the corrupt establishment. But I already got takes from both you guys on camera, but is there anything that you want to talk about specifically? I mean, I got there early. People were rocking up like a good 45 minutes early. That’s when I arrived. I didn’t think I’d get there that early. I ended up leaving work early, had coffee, something to eat, heard the opening speeches, spoke to Matt Trihey again. And Tom and I have both worked for Matt Trihey. He’s a builder down here in Melbourne.

 

Joel Davis: He’s the guy who organized the event, by the way, for the benefit.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I should have mentioned that. Sorry. Yeah, but that’s.

 

Joel Davis: His organization is called the Australian Workers Alliance, [National Workers Alliance] I believe. National workers, all national workers are.

 

Blair Cottrell: Sorry, my apologies, but NWA, the new boys in the Hood. Tom.

 

Thomas Sewell: Weakness with attitude.

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s a good guy.

 

Joel Davis: Well, they’re not wignats, though. Hey. They’re not wignats. Very optical, very good. Very good optics.

 

And also, I think the website is workers.org dot au for those who want to go and check out their website. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And, yeah, you can. I can assess that. This guy’s character, like, I. He’s a better man than me. He’s a hard worker. This guy has dedicated his whole life to providing the highest level of building services to specific clientele. And people seek him out to build high quality homes for them, like, high end homes. I’ve done stuff on his jobs that I never thought I’d do, like, spiral staircases. And I learned how to sort of assemble and use a concrete hole corer, by myself. I worked with steel, a lot of steel and concrete, which is not something that I experienced very much before working for Mattie Trihey.

 

But the fact that he put this event on is awesome, and it was really good to talk to him again. Bit of a blast from the past, actually. Running in swim. How long has it been since you’ve seen him, Tom?

 

Thomas Sewell: Recently? I’ve seen him in the city. When we do our protests, they organize in the city as well. So every protest that we did we would cross paths with them.

 

Blair Cottrell: Mattie Trihey, he’s been involved in protests in the city leading up to this event that he just hosted. Is that right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. So he was involved with the Freedom Rally organizers, and I believe that the main group of Freedom Rally organizers were doing, like, welcome to countries. And they were doing the whole liberal outlook on being anti-Covid. So not freedom because there are ancient rights, not freedom because it’s about respect. And that we’re like a noble people and we’re not to be treated by the State. That’s meant to serve us as a bureaucratic function. You know, people weren’t arguing from that angle. A lot of the anti-vaxxers were arguing, like, from this. They would do a “Welcome to Country” for Aboriginals. First they would talk about how this is infringing on these poor and disadvantaged groups, and they were coming from the weak position, not the strong position.

 

So obviously, that was going to create a natural split with a more Right-wing version of the anti-vax movement. And that’s what he’s led since day one.

 

Blair Cottrell: So the event organizer, Maddy Trihey, what we’re saying, what you’re saying there is he was involved in the anti-vax kind of freedom rallies that took place in Melbourne. Was he a director? I don’t think he was a direct organizer. I think he attended the rallies himself and then gradually became a prominent figure through giving speeches and networking.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s what all of them were. None of them were leaders. Who are these guys? What was it like, Harrison and all these people, have you. Had you ever heard of them before?

 

Blair Cottrell: I suppose they are truly grassroots guys. Like, these are people who come from salt of the earth working class. They’re not people who are raised in the universities in order to be professional politicians. Right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

[20:12]

 

Thomas Sewell: So, like, when UPF started, there was a lot of people, old heads in the movement, that were quite skeptical of us because they were like, who are these guys? Where have these guys come from? Like we were kind of getting accusations and that we weren’t innate grassroots, because we went from just random people on the street, not involved in politics, to political leaders just overnight.

 

So I think Covid was no different. It was another wave. Every time there’s chaos, there’s a new wave of potential political leaders that sort of just appear out of the ether. Not in a bad way, just in a way.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.