Blair Cottrell: Okay, this Sunday on 31st of August, is the March for Australia, happening all across Australia.

 

 

Now, let me just be clear. I’m not organising this event. I’m not staking any claim on it. That’ll get me started on explaining to you guys exactly what’s going on, actually, because this is an organic phenomena. It’s happening all on its own. No one is really at the helm of this thing. It’s Australians coming together of their own accord.

 

 

That’s not the first time something like this has happened in my lifetime. I think the last time this happened was about 10 years ago with the Reclaim Australia phenomena.

 

 

And then prior to that I was still just a young fella. That was the Cronulla beach protests, which they call the “Cronulla Riots”. But the system just framed it that way.

 

 

Each time this happens, it happens in response to some form of immigration or foreign presence in Australia, which is a source of pain or disruption to our way of life!

 

And also because anyone who can do anything about this pain, anyone in government, is not only doing nothing, but they’re making the situation worse by forcing more immigration onto Australians! And we’re supposed to live in a democracy, you’re supposed to only get what you vote for. But no one voted for mass immigration! Yet they’re having it forced on them anyway!

 

But mass immigration is obviously becoming a serious source of pain for Australians, which is why they’re responding with this anti-immigration counterculture.

 

But what’s actually happening here, the way I understand it, is its like a national immune response to foreign bodies.

 

 

Just imagine your own body’s immune system. When too many foreign bodies come in, the immune system activates to protect itself, and it does that without you really thinking about it. It’s not like you have to plan out an immune response. Your body reacts on its own.

 

 

Australians are much the same. If you imagine Australia like an organism, when too many foreign bodies start coming in at once, the national immune system activates to protect the country.

 

 

And the cells within the national body which can potentially make up the immune system response are us! The Australian people!

 

That’s why there’s no single organiser or promoter for this March for Australia. There doesn’t need to be. Australians are doing it on their own.

 

 

And naturally, there are some networks of (((people))) who aren’t very happy about the formation of this anti-immigration counterculture.

 

But if you think about it, realistically, there’s only three different types of people who wouldn’t support the March for Australia and the call to stop immigration.

 

 

The first type are immigrants themselves. Obviously, they’re not going to support this agenda. They’re trying to get family members into Australia on some bullshit student visa, just so they can live here together. They want to stay here, they want to get more people in. It’s not really in their interest to support this. So obviously they’re happy to be here and they’re happy to keep exploiting the situation.

 

But the second group that’s actually exploiting the situation are big business owners and big property developers and capital.

 

 

The kind of immigration rates we’re seeing into Australia are inflating the labour pool to such an extent where the traditional Australian worker can be replaced with a more manageable slave class, which will work for less and live in smaller spaces. Which is great for big business owners.

 

But then you’ve got property developers. Immigration drives up the demand for property, so big property owners and lessors can jack up property prices and rent. This means big bucks for big capital. You know the kind of (((people))) that sponsor major political parties.

 

Now, the third group of people who won’t support the march, these are the more deranged types, the kind of people who fell for all the conditioning and propaganda in the schools. You know:

 

 

“Australia was invaded by evil White devils! And everyone in the world can be Australian! It doesn’t matter your race or skin colour!”

 

If you believe that, you’re basically retarded and you support mass immigration because you’re retarded!

 

 

If I go back to my analogy of the organic national body, these people would be like a disease network which are trying to suppress and attack Australia’s immune system to make sure we can’t defend ourselves, which really works to the interests of immigrants and big capital.

 

Now, the first two groups, you can understand their motivation, it’s selfish. But the third group is really twisted! Don’t waste your time arguing with them, just ignore them. These people cannot be reasoned with. They’ll say and do whatever they can to prevent the Australian people from actually organising into some sort of culture where they can resist government policy, because current government policy is feeding disease networks like them.

 

Now, if you don’t fall into one of those three aforementioned categories, you probably do support the March for Australia, because you’re a standard working Australian family!

 

 

You want to be able to afford a home for your family, you want decent living conditions. You don’t want your country overrun by people from the third world. It’s pretty standard, normal stuff!

 

The point is, don’t let anyone gaslight* you into believing that getting involved in political activity and process makes you evil or is pointless. If it was so pointless, then why would they be so intent on stopping you from doing it?

 

[* Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which a person or group causes someone to question their own reality, memories, or perceptions, often leading to confusion, loss of confidence, and dependence on the manipulator. The term originates from the 1938 play (and later film) Gas Light, where a husband deliberately dims the gas lights in their home and then denies it, making his wife doubt her sanity.]

 

I do think the best result for a protest like this is probably a new political organisation or party which can challenge the major parties, because Liberal and Labor, they both essentially have the same (((sponsors))) and their policies aren’t that much different. They’re not going to stop immigration, they’re just going to keep ramping it up.

 

I think the march on Sunday will be a good start. I’ll see you there!

 

 

[05:01]

 

 

END

top

 

 

Blair on the way to the March for Australia event in Melbourne.

 

============================================

 

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live. It is the 17th of July, 2025. We had some bizarre technical nonsense going on for some reason, but we got the stream happening. We’re here we have Tom back. First time since Australia Day. We’ve got three of us back together. He’s finally off the ridiculous bail conditions. The South Australian police finally dropped the ridiculous charge of loitering from Australia Day, which I’m sure a lot of you are familiar with the events of that day. But it’s good to have you back, Tom.

 

How do you feel? I mean, I feel personally vindicated. I felt vindicated already considering all the other charges that were dropped. But this really cements the vindication that not just that we didn’t do anything wrong, we knew we didn’t do anything wrong, but that we made the right decision on the day to expose the tyranny. People were saying:

 

“Oh, how does going to jail, going to save the White race?”

 

Well, guess what, we’re not going to jail. Not for this anyway. [chuckling] Jury’s still out whether we go to jail for some other reason, but not for this.

 

So how are you feeling?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I think vindicated is the right word. It is a victory in the sense that we have shown the Australian people that through strength and persistence and resilience, we can get our message across. We can suffer without being humiliated.

 

And I think that’s important that Australians need to hear that. Currently we’re being humiliated as a people. The White Australian population is being obviously replaced and it is being humiliated while it’s being replaced. And if we stand up against this tyranny, they will make us suffer.

 

And I think through our strength, we’ve made it clear that suffering is more valuable than just living a peaceful life that’s ultimately humiliating.

 

So that’s how I feel strength. I feel strong. I feel that our strength and our resilience has proven us right.

 

Joel Davis: That’s a good point because you are naturally adapting to the kind of harassment tactics used to try to prevent you guys from doing what you’re trying to do, whether it’s activism or building the political party. And you do seem to have done or made a great deal of progress in the realm of adaptation. Because I’ll make the point, this basically panned out exactly as you said it would. You said you’re going to cop a beating on the day. You predicted there would be bullshit charges that wouldn’t stick and that have to drop eventually. And now that’s exactly what happened.

 

So not only are you adapting in terms of strategy, but you now know what to expect. As though the system has basically used all its cards and they can only keep doing the same thing they’ve always done. And you keep getting better at dealing with it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. And so much has changed for our organisation in terms of support from the public over the last six months. And I mean, what’s been really incredible is, and I don’t want this taken the wrong way, but we have had a lot of people that are former members of the Liberal Party reach out to us and say that one of the reasons why they have left the party and have started to donate to our cause and started to support our cause is because they can see, based off the election and the Liberal Party moving further to the Left and based off how we were treated by the system in Adelaide, which is, I think it’s a pretty strong liberal kind of state. I mean, Adelaide’s pretty churchy and has a lot of Christians in it and it’s got quite a conservative movement.

 

But this is how, you know, probably one of the more conservative states in the country, other than, I guess, Queensland. This is how they treat political dissidents on the Right. And that for them was the straw that broke the camel’s back. And their reason for supporting us going forward.

 

So it’s interesting that even in persecution, you can gain support and a following and assistance from people that have spent their whole life in mainstream politics. So I didn’t expect that. I didn’t predict that. I did predict that the Australian public in general would be more supportive of us, but I didn’t expect so many people would be jumping ship from the previous conservative faction of the Liberal Party.

 

The last thing I heard from our insiders within the Liberal Party is that about 50% of the members have left in the last two years.

 

And I’m not saying all of those have jumped across to us, but a significant portion of particular branches and seats have come across to show their support for us. So that’s good to see.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s a big number.

 

Joel Davis: It’s a good moment actually. I will say join the movement! Join the prospective political party White Australia.org. I do a bad job of remembering to shill this every week, so I’m just going to say it now while I’m thinking of it. If you’re in Australia, I put out a poll on Twitter a few days. Sorry, on Telegram a few days ago. The poll was, if you’re a White nationalist, how many times have you met up with other White Nationalists, at least one other White nationalist in real life this year to discuss politics or do anything political?

 

Very low bar. 57% of respondents said zero times. That’s crazy! So, like more than half of the Joel Davis spurg Telegram following can’t even meet up once with one White nationalist in real life since the beginning of this year. So I understand a lot of my followers are in other countries and whatever. But that’s a horrible statistic!

 

So if that’s you and you live in Australia, you have no excuse, like our country is being stolen from us. White Australia.org, sign up as a supporter. Maybe you don’t want to come and march in the street dressed in black and you know, get arrested, but you can at the very least join up as a supporter and help us found a political party to represent you and your beliefs, which obviously, if you’re watching this, unless you’re one of the assigned police officers or intelligence agents or journalists watching this, you share our beliefs.

 

So who else is going to represent them? No one except us! So sign up White Australia.org. Be part of the solution!

 

[06:43]

 

Blair Cottrell: Tom, what happened in your latest court appearance and what does that mean for you going forward?

 

Thomas Sewell: So today we had, I think, the third or fourth case conference, which is where the prosecution says they’re not ready to go to trial and they want to have a little bit more time to prepare. And they dragged us out for as many as they could, as many case conferences as they could, until eventually they had to drop the charges. Today the last charge I had was the loitering charge, which was the alleged reason for my arrest outside the Anzac Memorial in Adelaide on, I think it’s called North Terrace. I think the street, very beautiful part of Adelaide. We picked that area on purpose because of how beautiful it was.

 

And obviously I was arrested as I began giving a speech about how the South Australian police are corrupt and are serving traitor politicians.

 

So the whole purpose, the whole meaning or reason for the arrest was dropped and that was done very quickly. And then, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Was that the primary purpose for the arrest? Loitering? Is that what they tried to sell?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And then when I was arrested and taken back to the police station for allegedly loitering, they said that I’m being charged with loitering, resisting arrest and Nazi symbols.

 

And then when I got my paperwork, it just had loitering and Nazi symbols.

 

And then about six weeks ago, the Nazi symbols charge got dropped, which was the Union Jack and NSN patch on our shoulders.

 

And then obviously today they dropped loitering. But they put on a new charge today, which they hadn’t sent any information about to the magistrate or to my lawyer. And they have charged me with breaching the bail conditions for the loitering charge.

 

So I was under non-Association for loitering. And they’re saying, they’re suggesting, they’re alleging that I breached at some point over the last six months, I associated, they’re alleging, with people in our community.

 

So they’ve dropped the bail conditions because they were attached to the loitering. But there is another court date again for breach of bail.

 

Blair Cottrell: So they’re accusing you of breaching bail on a charge that they’ve dropped?

 

Thomas Sewell: Correct. And I asked the judge that question. I said:

 

“How can someone be charged with breaching bail conditions that were put on me that have now been dropped? Like if I didn’t commit the crime, why was the bail conditions even put on me? And therefore, how could I be charged breaching bail conditions that are put on me falsely?”

 

Blair Cottrell: It would make sense that the conditions imposed during the bail period are now void because it’s been found that there was no evidence to uphold the original charge in the first place.

 

Thomas Sewell: That would make sense, wouldn’t it? That’s common sense. But that’s not, unfortunately, how the magistrate saw it.

 

And instead of answering my question, he instead told me that I was being represented and wasn’t allowed to talk. And I told him to:

 

“Answer my question, buddy!”

 

Blair Cottrell: He wouldn’t have liked that!

 

Thomas Sewell: Because these people don’t deserve any respect. They are absolutely disgusting, corrupt thugs, that think that they can lock Australians up for, in the case of Stephen Wells, 4 months, over 100 days in solitary confinement for charges that were dropped. And they think that they deserve some sort of respect or honour for their disgusting, corrupt behaviour! It’s absolutely putrid! The Australian people should be, it’s absolutely abhorrent what the political class, what the ruling class are putting Australians through.

 

And when I called him, “buddy”, he threatened to have me removed from the call. And I just said:

 

“Okay, well then remove me. Like, you’re nothing, but you’re all corrupt, basically. And I want the record to show that you’re all corrupt.”

 

And then they just booted me from my own court case.

 

So they could have just put me on mute, but instead they just booted me for my own court case.

 

So that’s pretty funny. But they’re just disgusting! I hate them! I absolutely hate them! They’re absolutely disgusting! The prosecutors are professional liars! They put so many good men in prison over nothing. Over nothing! And all the charges have been dropped, except I think Joel’s belt, his [eagle] belt buckle, and one other guy still hasn’t had his loitering charge dropped yet.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, before you ask your question, Joel, if they are so corrupt, I’m assuming you mean the magistrate is corrupt as well?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, all of them. The original magistrate.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, why participate in the process? Like, have you got a plan? What’s the end goal? If they’re so corrupt, like, why answer their summons?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, if you don’t, you eventually get shot!

 

So I’m not looking to get shot at this stage by the police. Ultimately, you have to play the game. You have to abide by the law at all times, only break it to seize power. I think that was Julius Caesar that said that. He also said, Julius Caesar said:

 

“We must endure pain with patience!”

 

And I feel that every day we have to endure this pain with patience. And we’ve been doing that for some time now. And we’re going to keep enduring pain until we take power. And when we take power, then we’ll reassess the laws.

 

[12:11]

 

Blair Cottrell: I can imagine you’re probably holding out for maybe some High Court judges that maybe aren’t corrupt, right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, that’s a separate issue. So what we are looking to do is bundle all this stuff together with our High Court case, which I think you and Joel have covered a fair bit on the stream. I won’t go into too much detail, but, yes, we are still following through with two plans. One, appealing all the current criminal charges against us regarding Nazi symbols and gestures and any sort of attempt to stop our political communication.

 

And also we are looking to privately sue the police for their behaviour, their unlawful and unconstitutional behaviour.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think old Stephen Wells might have a role to play in that, because I can’t believe that guy spent, how long was it? Nearly four months. Three months. Four months in jail over a loitering charge that was then dropped just because he was trying to celebrate Australia Day publicly. I’ve never heard of anything close to that in Australian activism.

 

Joel Davis: According to High Court precedent, Stephen Wells has standing to go to the High Court and challenge the Constitutionality of what was done to him, of the acts that he was charged under. Because even though the charges were dropped, he did serve time. And particularly because they didn’t just charge him with loitering. Originally they did, but then when they realised that they’d have to release him after three months because it has a maximum sentence of three months. They then slapped a Nazi symbol charge on him in order to enable them to extend his stay in prison basically beyond the three month mark.

 

So he has standing to challenge that law at the High Court now because there’s been plenty of precedent established in High Court decisions that you don’t have to be being actively prosecuted under a particular law. You only need to have standing to go to the High Court. You just simply need to have suffered as a result of that law, that potentially unconstitutional law, and have reason to suspect that it could be applied to you again in the future. Now the Nazi symbol charge related to literally the symbol of our organisation or the NSN at the very least.

 

And so if you’re a member of the NSN, basically what they’re trying to say is that you could get arrested and thrown in prison for displaying our logo in public.

 

So it’s a political organisation. It seems like a pretty clear cut and dry constitutional issue.

 

So that’s what’s interesting that they’ve kind of facilitated Stephen potentially to go to the High Court. Also. Stephen Wells is up for a very handsome compensation payout. And so I think Stephen Wells will get paid very well for his four months. And Stephen Wells, the upstanding character that he is, he was saying to me today that:

 

“I want to sue these cunts, get as much money out of them as possible and then put that money away. So the next time someone gets arrested, they’ve got money to support them like the people who supported me.”

 

So he’s already like looking to be altruistic and pay it forward rather than just, I don’t know, sit on the cash, which he’s entitled to. So top bloke Stephen Wells! But it’s, I think he’s quite happy to do four months in prison and have a kind of epic story that inspires people and then go and collect money from ZOG and put it in the White Australia kitty, and so on. And now we’ve got standing to go to the High Court as I said.

 

So realistically we’ve taken a lot of wins here for not much suffering. I mean he had to suffer in prison. But the rest of us, we didn’t really need to suffer like we had minor inconveniences basically that we had to suffer. But the positive outcome from all of this has been to I think win a lot of sympathy in the public and gain a bit of legal leverage that we can now use.

 

Because when we set up this political party, obviously we’re contesting elections and it’s probably not going to be realistic that we’re going to go in and win government at the first election that we contest. Right? So we need something to do other than just march around and declare what we believe and try and get someone to vote for us.

 

And so these legal cases, not just these ones, but probably, I anticipate once we form the political party, there could be other High Court cases where they’re trying to take guns away from people who associate with us. We’re probably going to have to go to the High Court to try and protect their gun rights. There’s going to be stuff to do with the de-banking. Tom was saying he was intending on taking to the High Court. Then also, if we register our political party and then we have accounts on Instagram, Twitter, Facebook and so on, and they try to de-platform us, were currently de-platformed from these websites, well, then we’ve also got standing to go to the High Court and say these companies are basically impairing representative democracy, which is unconstitutional. They’re impairing our right to political communication. As a registered political party in Australia, how can Australians have a representative democracy if their own political parties can’t even communicate to the voters what their policies are? So we’d have a very strong case there.

 

I think that would have a lot of sympathy in the community because there’s so much push in the state at every level to increase censorship on the Internet. And this could be one of the only ways really to strike back without taking power and reversing all these laws and getting rid of the eSafety Commission and all this garbage, would be to try and get to the High Court and get a decision that would establish precedent that would limit state overreach and the overreach of these big tech companies.

 

So these legal battles are going to be very important for us going forward and if we can have some successes or at least, you know, stand up sympathetically for our rights as Australians, could be a great way to also raise a lot of support for the party and the movement in general to see that we’re trying to engage in productive battles to defend the rights and freedoms of Australians, even outside of political power.

 

[18:28]

 

Blair Cottrell: If I’m understanding correctly, Tom, you’re now a free man, limited by no legal conditions of association. You can now train with the boys, you can associate with who you want. I’m imagining this because you’re on the stream with us for the first time in a while. The reason you haven’t been able to jump onto the stream with Joel or I, or with Joel specifically, is because he’s a member of your organisation. Am I right in believing this? You’re a free man now? Well to some extent.

 

Thomas Sewell: Relatively, yeah. I’m not currently having my political communication suppressed by the Magistrates Court, but I do still have three pending court cases regarding other matters that are, like including the so-called offensive behaviour in Ballarat. Doing a political demonstration in Ballarat. Jacob Hersant’s also been charged with offensive behaviour for a rally he did in Melbourne CBD So those two rallies, both rally leaders or rally spokespersons, like the speakers of both those rallies have been charged. Myself and Jacob. Joel, have you been charged yet with offensive behaviour?

 

Joel Davis: No, they’re still investigating me for the jews Hate Freedom rally. But they’ve got 12 months, so they can basically, … They’re also investigating me for offensive behaviour also for when we had the boys, my rabbi friends, and we went down and endorsed the Liberal Party at the last election. And yeah, so we’ll see if they end up charging me on those, but we don’t know yet.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, so another tactic they’re using, Blair, is they’re confusing political speech with like public misconduct.

 

So they’re trying to use laws that stop you from mooning a police officer or something silly like that. Or I think it’s like really bad swearing or something like that. They’re trying to use these laws to prevent political communication. The same way in Adelaide they tried to use loitering as a law to stop us from politically communicating.

 

But yeah, so I’m on bail for those and I have trials upcoming this year for those cases. But yeah, I’m allowed to associate at this stage. Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: I watch updates on Australian like motorcycle clubs sometimes just like Crime Updates, news on YouTube. It’s just a side interest of mine and I can’t help but notice that I think they’re trying to treat you guys the same way they treat some of these so-called outlaw motorcycle clubs. Because in Australia, if you don’t know, we have bikie gangs. In Queensland specifically, I’m pretty sure there’s strong legislation making it very difficult for those gangs to operate. I’m pretty sure you can’t even have a gang or MC club logo or insignia. Like you can’t even display it publicly. Or even have it in your house. If they know you’ve got it, they’ll raid you and take your jumper because it has a club logo on it.

 

And I’m just noticing similarities between the way the police treat you guys down here. It’s like they want you to be an outlaw gang and they expect to be able to get away with treating a political organisation which in the near future will be a registered political party, like they’re an outlaw gang. And I don’t think that’s going to fly. There’s no precedent in Australian legal history where that’s being tolerated by serious levels of court.

 

Of course, magistrates levels of court seem to tolerate whatever they’re told to tolerate. But I think once you get to county and beyond, you’ll probably see some judges and some outcomes that are more favourable to what is fair and actually legally applicable for you guys.

 

So, yeah, I’m glad you’re out! Well out of the conditions that were binding you and I’m glad you’re able to join us again.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s going to be the main thing on our agenda? What are we going to go on with lads?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I think the big thing to discuss this week in international politics is the way that Trump is trying to really unsuccessfully sweep the whole Jeffrey Epstein thing under the rug. I mean, obviously the cover-up has been successful. They’ve managed to, well first the FBI and the Attorney General of the United States came out last week and said:

 

“Oh, the Epstein files, they don’t actually don’t exist. We’ve concluded our investigation and they don’t exist!”

 

Just tried to gaslight everyone. And obviously the reaction from just everyone in the world basically was:

 

“What do you mean they don’t exist?”

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, explain to me, Joel, explain to me. And for the audience, to make it simple, what are the Epstein files? What do they consist of? Is it a list of clients that were in a prostitution ring? Because that’s my understanding. Is that right?

 

[23:23]

 

Joel Davis: I’m sure the files contain a lot more than just that.

 

But obviously the files would contain names of who’s going there and there’s been all these allegations that potentially these people are named and those people like Bill Clinton or Prince Andrew and blah, blah, blah, and photos of different elites and that were involved with Jeffrey Epstein and so on, and people going to the island, the flight logs, the so-called Lolita Express that was taking all these people out to this private island in the Caribbean. But obviously we don’t know what’s in the files because the files have not been released. Right.

 

But there was a promise before the last election that if Trump was to win, the files would be released, which no one intelligent believed. But even like Donald Trump Jr. was saying:

 

“Release the files!”

 

You know, blah, blah, blah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And now they’re saying there are no files. Is that right

 

Joel Davis: No, they’re not actually saying that now. Now they said that. And then a few days later, Trump changed the narrative to, not there are no files, to:

 

“Well, the Democrats they’ve concocted fake documents!”

 

And the whole Jeffrey Epstein thing apparently is a Democrat op, just like the Steele dossier and blah, blah, blah. And:

 

“It’s a hoax and it’s a political witch hunt and all this stuff trying to undermine me!”

 

He’s trying to spin it like this. But it’s ridiculous!

 

Number one, because Jeffrey Epstein committed, quote, unquote, “suicide”. You know, no one really believes that he killed himself.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh yeah, I heard the footage that they had of him in jail. Someone ran it through a metadata analysis and found that it had been edited several times. They could even tell the programme it was edited with. So the stuff that they released or had regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s suicide has all been doctored and edited. That’s not the real footage of his so-called suicide.

 

Joel Davis: Well, also, when that occurred he was under the Attorney General of the United States was Bill Barr. Bill Barr’s father, by the way, employed Jeffrey Epstein a long time ago and they have long, deep family connections to one another. Bill Barr was made Attorney General of the United States by Trump. He was in the Trump administration and he was the one running the Department of Justice who had Jeffrey Epstein incarcerated.

 

So it was under his watch that Jeffrey Epstein was killed and it was under his watch that it wasn’t investigated and that it was covered up.

 

So the Trump administration covered this up to begin with. Also, Donald Trump himself was friends with Jeffrey Epstein from the 1980s onwards. They allegedly, their friendship allegedly broke down in the 2000s because they had a dispute like Trump bought some condo in Palm beach in Florida that Jeffrey Epstein wanted to buy and they had some dispute. But they were very close friends. There’s lots of video footage showing this and Jeffrey Epstein even described Donald Trump as his “best friend” at one point in the 1990s.

 

So that’s obviously very important to bring up.

 

And also there’s plenty of people in the Trump administration or around Trump, like Trump’s Lawyer Alan Dershowitz, who is a jew and who was one of the main lawyers working on the whole election fraud, so-called lawsuits and so on after the 2020 election. He was also Jeffrey Epstein’s Lawyer and apparently went to the island and so on. There’s just so many connections between Trump and Epstein and Trump’s original administration and associates and Jeffrey Epstein. The list just goes on. We could do a whole stream just detailing all this stuff. So move forward.

 

Obviously there’s a lot of Democrats that are implicated in this too, like the Clintons and so on. So the Democrats aren’t going to release the files. The Democrats aren’t going to hold people to account for what’s happened here either.

 

But Trump is saying because the Democrats were sitting on the files over the last four years, magically they’ve changed them all and he doesn’t want to release them because apparently he’s basically admitting guilt that he’s in the files.

 

Elon Musk came out a few weeks ago and said they’re not being released because Trump’s in the files. Put the pressure on Trump after they fell out. And the pressure is telling, because now while Trump is every day coming out saying:

 

“No one cares about Jeffrey Epstein, everyone needs to stop talking about it.”

 

And so on. We’re seeing more and more elements of his base, of his movement turning on him. Tucker Carlson is giving speeches.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I turn on my YouTube. I don’t even watch stuff in relation to Jeffrey Epstein. I know almost nothing about it. I know what most people would know that is that there is some sort of list or documents implicating people in very unethical activities, probably for the purposes of Israeli blackmail and influence over American politicians. That’s what I know. And I turn on my YouTube and all throughout my recommended videos is people that usually do streams on video games or conspiracies who don’t even usually talk about this stuff, like doing videos on this stuff. So it’s just across the board. Have you seen much of it?

 

Joel Davis: I saw an opinion poll by the way of Americans:

 

“And do you agree with how Trump is handling the Jeffrey Epstein case?”

 

And it was like 12% said yes. So he’s lost everyone. Like no one’s going along with this shit! But go ahead Tom.

 

Thomas Sewell: I don’t have anything to add on the Epstein thing. It’s obviously been covered. It’s my only observation, …

 

[28:55]

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you agree that it kind of feels really drawn out. It’s almost like I’m sick of hearing it. It’s like it’s been going on for so long and nothing’s ever come of it. Maybe they’re trying to create that feeling, just kind of make people feel fatigued.

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe. I think that it’s a weapon that both sides have used against each other.

 

So when the Democrats were in power with Biden, they had the Biden laptop scandal and they had obviously a lot of people in the Democrat Party were connected to Epstein and other people that were on the Lolita Express. A lot of a list celebrities are Democrats and they were all on the list.

 

And then now that Trump’s in power being, you know, turned back on Trump obviously photos way back in the day, like before the 2020 election came out that showed Trump as friends with Epstein and Trump making comments about how Epstein’s got a particular taste in younger women. And Trump was saying that he kind of agreed with it. It was a bit incriminating. You know, if you were Italian, there’d be plausible deniability that you’re talking about 18 year olds or something. Anyway, I digress.

 

I think that it’s interesting to see a mega civil war or MAGA civil war, however you want to pronounce it. I think it’s good to see that there are these kind of Qtard, you know, conspiracy theorist, you know, MAGAs or Make America Great Again camp that all of a sudden are telling people to move on from a legitimate conspiracies, a legitimate Mossad blackmail entrapment scheme. Because they always want you to focus on conspiracy theories, but just not the ones that are real. They want you to focus on nonsense and talk about Antarctic, well, not necessarily nonsense, but they want to talk you about side quest things like Antarctica and 5G and stuff like that.

 

But then this is just black and white! This is an Israeli Mossad blackmail scheme. It’s undeniable, it’s a fact. And these people want us to brush it under the table.

 

And it just shows that, yeah, the MAGA camp is dead. It ties in good timing as well with obviously the tension between, you know, Musk, who’s a power broker in the US and Donald Trump. And so seeing the MAGA camp fall apart is a good thing. It’s a good thing. And it’s a good thing for the same reason why we’ve worked so hard to destroy the Liberal Party here in Australia, successfully destroy the Liberal Party here in Australia.

 

Americans need a form of Right-wing, pro-White politics that is superior to Make America Great Again. They need a much harder and more staunch, more ideologically consistent. It’s not just a kind of cult of personality around Donald Trump. So I’m watching, I’m watching along.

 

Joel Davis: What was very interesting this week was Tucker Carlson gave a speech at the Turning Point USA event where he basically said Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad agent. And this is being swept under the rug. How come Israel can blackmail our politicians with sexual blackmail, with a paedophile ring, and there’s a conspiracy on both sides of politics to cover it up:

 

“How is this acceptable?”

 

And the crowd was going ballistic at this conservative event. At Charlie Kirk’s Hail Israel Hail ZOG conservative event. The crowd’s still going ballistic.

 

So there’s been a sea change where conservative political discourse in the United States has become dominated by dissident Right talking points ideas. And the younger generation of Right-wingers in the United States and I think everywhere are turning against the jews, against Israel. They’re more radical on racial issues. And Tucker Carlson coming out and doing that, basically he just pissed in Trump’s face. And then Trump came out this few days ago and said:

 

“Well, anyone who wants to talk about Epstein, I don’t want their support. They’re fake supporters and we’re done with them.”

 

So what is he saying? He doesn’t want Tucker Carlson support, doesn’t want the support of Matt Walsh. I saw Matt Walsh come out and criticise Trump on the same grounds. Like so many of these really big, like massive following influential conservative commentators that come out on the side of the people against Trump.

 

And so what this is the foundation of a new American Right, in my opinion, that moves beyond Trump, that embraces more radical talking points. And it seems like Elon Musk is willing to fund these guys too.

 

So it’s shaping up to be quite interesting to see how this develops over the next couple years because a lot of people thought after the last election, Peter Thiel got his J.D. Vance, you know, curry burner, vice president installed. And Trump will just basically bamboozle all the Boomers and all the masses with his charisma and his policies and everyone will de-radicalise and then JD Vance will end up just being the heir to the throne and then he’ll become president and they’ll just hold this paradigm of politics down on lock for the next decade and we’re just going to have to eat the slop.

 

Well, actually, I don’t think so. actually, this has completely blown things up and now it seems like a more radical challenger could emerge to take the throne off The Prince.

 

So it’s quite interesting to observe.

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you guys think about, because you mentioned Tucker Carlson. What do you guys think about Tucker Carlson? What’s his game? Because his message has become more explicit in the last year or so. and where does he stand? Do you trust him?

 

[35:03]

 

Thomas Sewell: No! [chuckling] I don’t trust him.

 

But it’s an improvement of controlled opposition, certainly. If the controlled opposition has to continue moving further and further to our direction, well, eventually they’ll have to run a controlled opposition which is just a copy of us.

 

And I think people will choose the real us over the controlled opposition copy of us, when it gets to that point.

 

So, yeah, it’s a good to see, it’s very good to see the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Battle there is to continue existing. Yeah, because they won’t want you to exist. Right. But if he’s controlled opposition, Tucker Carlson, who’s controlling him, do you think? What are your theories?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, I think he’s in the CIA. Yeah, I think he’s in the CIA.

 

So I think he’s part of a different faction within the Deep State. And I think Trump was an independent person that was being influenced by different factions within the CIA.

 

And I think that perhaps they’re jumping ship from Trump. I don’t think that Tucker Carlson is entirely aligned with Musk, for example. I think he’s kind of like a fourth party when you think about it. I don’t know too much about Democrat politics, but I think the Right-wing is moving in an odd direction where there’s the Trump camp, there’s the Musk camp, and there’s the, what you could call like the Tucker camp. And I think those are the three most powerful forces in the American Right.

 

Blair Cottrell: I expect you have your reasons for believing that. There’s probably plenty of information that suggests that. I haven’t personally looked into it. What do you think, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: His father was a CIA agent. That’s confirmed. And then Tucker himself said that he wanted to join the CIA in the 1990s when he finished college, but he didn’t make the grade, apparently. He didn’t get the contract. So then he decided to become a journalist. But that seems, I don’t know [chuckling] if I believe that story.

 

Thomas Sewell: Bullshit!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Bullshit, because the CIA are desperate for recruits, and especially recruits with a high IQ, which he has. And it’s a fact that the CIA hires thousands and thousands of journalists a year. Hires people to become journalists.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. There’s something called Operation Mockingbird. Google it. Yeah. If you don’t know what it is.

 

Thomas Sewell: I mean, it’s slightly different, but it’s on the same talking point. You know, the Director General of ASIO only two or three years ago came out in a Senate inquiry and said that:

 

“They employ journalists, that they could be a journalist, they could be a teacher, they could be whatever, and they’re actually secretly an ASIO agent. We’re everywhere, basically.”

 

And in the case of journalism, it’s very important to have intelligence services control journalism. That’s probably the key industry for intelligence services to control.

 

Joel Davis: Also, if you want to understand Tucker Carlson’s motivations, I think the motivations could be understood if he is like a CIA operative or at least connected to the Deep State, is geopolitical.

 

So what does Tucker Carlson basically do with his influence? He plays down the whole Russia thing, criticises Zelensky, criticises funding the war in Ukraine. Now he’s criticising Israel and the involvement with Israel.

 

But he’s also always been a China hawk who has been very consistent that China is the real threat. America needs to focus on fighting China. And there’s other elements in the Trump administration and across the American Right who have that view. Elbridge Colby, who’s the Undersecretary of Defense, he’s been saying that for years, and now he’s the Under Secretary of Defense. He just came out the other day demanding that Australia and Japan commit to fighting alongside the United States if Taiwan is invaded, to give you an idea of what he’s all about. And he’s also the main guy in the Trump administration trying to block assistance to Ukraine and so on, because he thinks it’s taking away from a deterrent and potential action against China in vis a vis Taiwan.

 

So Tucker Carlson comes along and he can kind of wrangle the Crown by pushing this kind of anti-Ukraine, anti-Israel, which are both very popular with conservatives Angles in order to kind of push for a war with China or China, Hawking, at the very least, in addition to having a very kind of patriotic, you know, style and so on. You can see why the CIA would look upon him as someone or look upon that style of politics as something that they would support because they would see it maybe as in the geopolitical interests of the United States. And that’s what the CIA is fundamentally like. It’s fundamental reason for existing is basically keeping America the global hegemon.

 

Blair Cottrell: For our American viewers, I know we’ve had Thomas Rousseau on the show, leader of Patriot Front. Is he the primary guy, organisation, political faction or personality you guys would endorse in America? Is there someone else? Is he the main man? I mean, who’s the real deal?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, Thomas is, and Patriot Front is the most organised and they are the largest White nationalist group in the United States. They hold their cards a little bit closer to their chest than us in terms of their ideology. They keep things a little bit more “heritage American”, as they say. And that’s their strategy. It’s kind of like a halfway point between what we’re doing and the United Patriots Front, obviously, without UPF being a purely anti-Islam movement, it being a Patriot Front. So it, yeah, it’s definitely a specific tactic that he’s using and he’s done quite well with it. And they continue to grow.

 

There are a lot of other organisations. The Rob Rundo active club model was quite large and it’s all across the country. So their groupings are a lot smaller. You know, you’re talking usually five to ten guys at a time, but there are hundreds of groups of five to 10 guys.

 

And then you have Hammer, doing Blood Tribe. So we get accused of being wignats, but we’re pretty light on the wignatory compared to particular people in America.

 

And you’ve got all sorts of groups. You’ve got Wagner’s group, you’ve got Volkers Resistance Movement, you’ve got, … There’s a lot of groups in the United States. It’s very different to Australia in that sense. We’ve kind of co-ordinated all of the White nationalist energy all into one body, which has its pros and cons.

 

But in the United States, I think Patriot Front probably control 30 or 40% of the market, if you want to put it that way. But they certainly have over 90% of the visibility. What they’ve done very well is they’ve got the majority of the visibility.

 

[42:03]

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[2:38:14]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/24/2025 = 33)

Blitz007
6 days ago
these people are great and we need more of em
18 likes

Report
WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
6 days ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE
12 likes

Report
Strueth
6 days ago
Thanks guys, I love listening to your chats… I don’t feel so alone in our country knowing you have our backs and are willing to stand up for our white Australia… I long for how it was in the 70’s… we had it all, and slowly it’s been taken right out from under us, betrayed by those wimps in parliament… Thank you
9 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
4 days ago
The fuckery really kicked off with Whitlam. Constitutional vandalism which needs to be addressed. That was when the gloves came off with Vietnamese immigration and demoralising ‘liberal’ law pushes. We were ruled by TV and under the oogabooga blues spell.
2 likes

Report
StevenGurr
6 days ago
Absolute total bullshit Sick of these cunt pigs and courts. Loitering isn’t even an arrestable offence and then to continue adding simple offences is a joke. And further to add non association conditions on the bail is totalitarian shit. Keep up the fight and go after every individual pig, judge and state lawyer involved.
5 likes

Report
Dissident_Loner
Supporter
6 days ago
Hey! The Three Amigos!
2 likes

Report
Restlessdreams88
6 days ago
88 .
1 like

Report
mharrison52
6 days ago
rome, pheonixian, ancient arayans in India. Mexica, Brazil, All of central and south america. America and Candada now. every great white civilization has ended the same way mongrolzation then conplete collapse. It’s a trend about whites that we cant afford to mistake again. in aglobal society there are no where to go. global genocide.
1 like

Report
Sieger88
6 days ago
Unfortunately Aston Martin is now owned by the kíke Strulović
0 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
paceytarzan
6 days ago
Sieg
0 likes

Report
Winstein_Synagoguehill
6 days ago
Luxury and comfort made the yankees soft. There’s not much of a White working class in the USA. Most working class are Amerindian and African. Go into a boxing gym in the USA and there’s not a single White person. Completely reversed from Britain and Ireland. American families the mother is usually the boss and dad has been cucked to a little muted nub.
0 likes

Report
KeithyFM
5 days ago
Turks and Greeks… chalk n cheese. Turks should be back in Turkmenistan.
0 likes

Report
Motion937
5 days ago
The mustache without the beard looks goofy with the shaved head.
0 likes

Report
Motown88
Supporter
4 days ago
Yes there are young women that have resisted the feminist conditioning, 5 of them are my daughters… and I’m so proud.
0 likes

Report
deputydawg000
4 days ago
CritalEyeMMA on youtube and AntiwokeMMA on rumble is also worth a look. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iz_LOvsbMiM https://rumble.com/v6w0l5s-livestream-one-year-anniversary.-its-the-jews.-race-realism-live-stream.html?e9s=src_v1_wh&playlist_id=watch-history
0 likes

Report
Orangejoos
4 days ago
Very pragmatic , and informed discussion . Always appreciate the three of you. I’m only informed by Nick otherwise , the rest is almost entirely bullshit or toxic. Thanks — for all you hero’s do.
0 likes

Report
wyrdweasel
3 days ago
I think that you have had to do something blackmailable in order to be able to do business at the highest level and to join the club. When everyone in that circle has something on everyone else, there would be a certain kind of mutual insurance when it comes to the threat of exposure.
0 likes

Report
empowerprivate
2 days ago
Rabbis, when they are sucking blood out, it’s Adrenochrome.
0 likes

Report
Restlessdreams88
19 hours ago
Gotta get Jacob on more
0 likes

Report
katana17
6 days ago
[Joel Davis – MechaHitler – a Manifestation of Musk’s Machiavellianism, or Something More? – Jul 11, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/07/17/joel-davis-mechahitler-a-manifestation-of-musks-machiavellianism-or-something-more-jul-11-2025-transcript/
-1 like

Delete
mharrison52
6 days ago
aTom has Aura like an Anglo Addy
-1 like

Report
hueyvam123
6 days ago
The best. Great to see the gang back together again.
-1 like

Report
EarthlingCarl
5 days ago
No hate but is Joel rocking a comb over?
-1 like

Report
RadicalAIAgenda
5 days ago

-1 like

Report
whitehonkymonkey
5 days ago
hello lads,good to see the crew back together. though it feels like a win with the courts,its all about getting rid of us on the day. they don’t give a f… about the arrests not sticking ,as long as they pull you off the street on the day. your tactics also need to create distractions when out protesting. create confusion. keep it up lads.
-1 like

Report
BasedNapoleon
5 days ago
Just watched ‘Latham at Large’ where Mark Latham featured as a guest journalist on 60 minutes covering the 2010 election between Tony Abbott and Julia Gillard. He deconstructed the campaign process and pressed Abbott about migration.
-1 like

Report
UncircumcisedCircus
5 days ago
I do think there is a waspy faction of the CIA that doesnt want to always take orders from the Mossad.
-1 like

Report
DaveScribe
5 days ago
Blair, all it takes is an accusation. Ironic since you were accused of stalking by a woman who was stalking you. It’s not uncommon for the perpetrator to call the police first in order to allay suspicion off from themself. I was in a holding cell with a middle aged white engineer who had a knife pulled on him by his neighbor. The neighbor called the cops first & got the engineer arrested.
-1 like

Report
Motown88
Supporter
4 days ago
Great stream guys, thanks
-1 like

Report
ProvingNihil
4 days ago
Would love to meet white nationalists in my area but can’t find any in my state.
-1 like

Report
ProvingNihil
4 days ago
Also when dating a woman, hell or just interacting with anyone in general. I personally record it on my GoPro, yeah it’s a tad bit weird some people don’t understand, but you never know what will happen, especially with women.
-1 like

Report
Makulatoren
VerifiedSupporter+
4 days ago
I disagree with Thomas about Tucker Carlson. The CIA would never betray the mossad in that way of having matyr made on. Because then they would lose their Epstein tickets. Tucker is just acting like the average boomer. He wants to back to the american ideal but knows deep down that it was fake. Yet he still yerns for it.
-1 like

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: Okay, we should be live. It is the 4th of July, so if we’re in America, it would be Independence Day. But Obviously in Australia, 4th of July doesn’t mean anything. And interesting show for you tonight, I hope. Big show for you this evening, even though we are missing Blair. There’s a lot I wanted to break down, a lot I wanted to discuss. Blair’s sick, so I gave him the night off and decided to ride solo for this one.

 

So, yeah, you’re going to be getting two hours of me yapping, but presumably that’s what you’re all here for. So, sorry, I don’t have any Blair to kind of break it up. But it is what it is. The man’s sick. I think Mark Collett made him get out of bed early the 4 o’ clock in the morning or whatever for a Mark Collett stream the other day. And it kind of tipped him over the edge. It is winter down here in Australia and so he’s a bit under the weather.

 

But yeah, there’s a few big stories I wanted to touch tonight. The main thing I wanted to do, I’ve been doing a bit of a deep dive into Chinese politics lately and the last few days because there’s a lot of very interesting kind of subtle dynamics going on there. And it’s really interesting precisely because the timetable for potentially World War III kind of hinges upon Chinese politics. And that has massive implications for Australia, for America, for the world. So it’s hard to get good information and to kind of break through all the propaganda on both sides and figure out what’s happening because of the nature of the Chinese system. But I’ve done a considerable amount of reading and study.

 

And so I was going to set out my preliminary analysis this evening for all of you to kind of like red pill you on recent developments in China and what’s potentially happening and what to look for over the next few months as more signs will become evident as to what direction things are going at in Chinese politics where potentially, yeah, a lot hinges on kind of what happens over the next few months.

 

But before I get into that, there’s a few other stories. There’s a shocking story here in Australia with this, I think probably the most egregious child rape paedophile allegations I can remember in Australia. So there’s probably been something worse over the years, but I just don’t remember anything as bad as this. I pull this up here from The Noticer:

 

“Homosexual childcare worker charged with raping eight babies and toddlers. A homosexual child care worker has been charged with sexually abusing babies and toddlers at a child care centre in Point Cook, Melbourne. Alleged child rapist Joshua Dale Brown, 26, was arrested on May 12 and charged with 70 child sex offences against eight children aged between five months and two years old at Creative Gardens Early Learning centre, Point Cook between April 2022 and January 2023. The charges included sexual penetration of a child under 12, sexual assault, sexual activity in the presence of a child, possess child abuse material for use through a carriage service and possess child abuse material. Brown, who appeared with pink and blue dyed hair in a Facebook photo with his boyfriend during the same time period he worked at the Point Cook centre, had no criminal record and had a valid working with children check. It has since been cancelled.”

 

“Victoria police said on Tuesday they are now investigating whether there are more victims as Brown worked at 20 child care centres around Melbourne between January 2017 and May 2025 and are examining evidence of an allegation at a second centre at Essendon. The alleged child sex predator appears in a photo at that centre shared on its Facebook page on March 21st for so-called Harmony Day with the caption, quote, ‘today we recognise Australia’s cultural diversity’. Brown also tested positive for a sexually transmitted disease and authorities have contacted the families of 1200 children who attended the same child care centres to urge them to get tested. The alleged paedophile first appeared in court in May, but a suppression order issued by Magistrate Michael White and applied for by police and the Office of Public Prosecutions meant the case could not be made public at the time.”

 

“But as the investigation has developed in scale, the need to notify more than 2, 600 families as a precaution became apparent. Suppression order was therefore revoked and police announced the charges and made the unusual decision to release the alleged child rapist name.”

 

Yeah, anyway, you can go read the whole thing on Noticer. I mean I read most of it, but I mean horrific! And look at, he’s gone to so many different child care centres. He’s flip-flopping around doing days at all these different child care centres.

 

And so now thousands of parents have to get their children tested for STDs. This is beyond fucked up! Like it’s actually like it’s hard to even believe this is even real from my point of view. Like it’s hard to, I mean I’m not denying that it’s real. It’s obviously real, but it’s hard to fathom. It’s hard to come to terms with that this is real, this is happening. And there’s a lot of obvious things that one could say about this. Right? You know, I’ve heard calls for:

 

“Oh, we need to ban men from working in child care centres!”

 

Probably not the most unreasonable thing in the world, but, like, wouldn’t that break, like, discrimination laws? The kind of contradictions of the system are kind of being shown up there. You know, obviously gay dudes, highly disproportionately paedophiles. That discussion has been opening up.

 

[06:20]

 

But I think the real discussions that are important here and that are pertinent here, are these. Number one, nobody in Australian politics with any kind of power or influence, no major political party is calling for the death penalty. This guy is raping kids. Some of them haven’t even turned one. This guy is raping children that young in a systematic, predatory way and filming it. He needs to die! Like, I don’t. Who’s going to come and debate me on this subject? Who’s going to offer the counter argument, no, we need to keep this guy alive. For what reason?

 

Pedophiles need to be executed. But particularly it’s a case like this. I mean it’s. How is it even, … Why the fuck did we get rid of the death penalty? And it’s just putrid that we have to breathe the same air that this scum breathes. It’s unacceptable. It’s an insult to the honour of our nation that someone can commit crimes like this against our children and stay alive. He needs to die! He needs to be put to death. Obviously the system won’t do that. And I’m seeing barely anyone call for this.

 

When we launch our political party. This is going to be one of key items on our platform. I think this is a message, a national conversation that we need to have. I think pretty much everyone in Australia agrees we need to put child rapists to death.

 

So that’s going to be one of the key issues I think that we’re going to attack, because we just need a far more serious response.

 

I mean, there’s too many cases. I mean, this person hasn’t been caught before, but there’s been too many cases of child rapists that have gone to jail, served short jail sentences, where they get held in protective custody so the other prisoners don’t kill them, released back into the community and then reoffend.

 

I mean, how is this even happening? How are we ever releasing someone who is a child rapist back onto the street ever! Like that’s just insane! That’s insane! It begs the question, the people making these decisions, why are they so lenient? Is it because they themselves are engaging in this kind of behaviour? Why are politicians not doing anything about this? Is it because they themselves are engaging in this kind of behaviour? It really does beg the question. Why else would you try to protect paedophiles unless you are one yourself, or you’re working with them in some systematic way or somethings surely this is something that we can all agree on. Left-wing, Right-wing. It’s just disgusting!

 

I mean, second thing that I also would like to say about this is another key policy that we’re going to be putting forward in this country. We have the child care rebate. Now I’ll look into this. Actually, I’ll look it up right now. How much is the average child care rebate a year for working mothers in Australia? Looking it up right now. So there’s child care studies, subsidies.

 

So the child care subsidy percentage decreases as family income increases. For instance, families earning up to 80,000 may receive up to a 90% subsidy, while those earning above $530,000 a year are not eligible. So what it’s saying here is, basically if you earning like an average wage, the government basically pays for your kid to go to childcare. If you’ve got children under school age. Why are we paying? Like if the mother of the child literally can’t afford to pay for child care, why are we subsidizing that? Why don’t instead of paying mothers to dump their kids at like random child care centres run by foreigners infested with paedophiles so they can get raped? How about instead of that, we pay that money to mothers to stay home and take care of their own children.

 

In society today you can be moralistic about it. Mothers should be taking care of their own children. And I agree with that. But obviously economically it’s quite difficult today to have stay at home mothers. You know, it’s difficult to raise a family on one income and for many reasons related to cost of living.

 

So what’s the number one thing that we could do if we want to increase the birth rate and protect children, pay mothers to stay home! I think that’d be an incredibly popular policy. Popular with women and with men. Right? Most men would like their missus to stay home and take care of the house and take care of the kids. The state should pay. That’s a social good. The state should pay for it. Taxpayers, I’d rather pay my taxes so that White mothers can stay at home raising White babies, then paying child care subsidies so they can go and work and send their kid off to some like, paedophile rape centre. So we can protect the kids. We can get the mothers back in the homes so the kids are raised properly. People will have more children because women, won’t be as busy with their careers. They’ll be able to have more children, feel more comfortable to have more children, be incentivised to have more children because they’ll probably get bigger payments the more children they have.

 

And then we won’t need immigration anymore to expand the population. I mean, it’s just a beautiful policy. Everyone wins. It’d be an expensive policy, but we’ve got like 15% of the country on NDIS, the disability insurance scheme. Most of them are rorting it. Most of them are capable of working and just have like a diagnosis, like a bullshit, like psychology diagnosis to allow them to just grift off the system. Got all these like immigrants that come here from the Middle East and just sit on Centerlink grift off that. So many people are grifting off this system. If we shut down all those grifts and redirected that money to young White mothers to have White babies. I’d much rather they be the ones grifting. I’d much rather reproduction be the grift. A lot of people say:

 

“Oh, how are you going to get women to vote for Nazis? How are you going to get women to vote for nationalism?”

 

I think this is a pretty fucking good policy that we can get their votes on, but men as well. We want to be able to bring back the Australian dream, raising a family on one income.

 

[12:56]

 

So I think this issue here really just illustrates how great policies like this just don’t exist in the political system. Like, no one’s really interested in trying to fix the major social problems of our time that have very simple solutions that no one talks about, no one thinks of, that would be 90% of the country behind you, popular. So I think we can really do some damage in a political system like this, presenting these kinds of ideas to the people.

 

I think a lot of people are going to be very pleasantly surprised:

 

“How come the Nazis have such good policies? What the fuck!”

 

And yeah, we can hopefully move the debate onto our terms. And yeah, but I mean, just disgusting the story. I mean, what else can you say about it? We just got to kill this fucker. We’re not advocating for to do anything illegal, but he needs to be legally executed, anyway.

 

Another I’m not going to go into another issue. I’m going to focus on this China thing because there’s a lot to unpack.

 

So basically what I’ve been looking into lately is there’s been a lot of rumours swirling that President Xi Jinping in China is, his power is being curtailed, basically. That his grip on power is significantly slipping, that other elements within the Chinese Communist Party are reasserting themselves. And there’s many reasons why people are suspecting this. And I heard this at first months ago and I suspected it was Western propaganda and the type of thing you hear all the time:

 

“Oh, Vladimir Putin is going to drop dead, he has cancer, he’ll die within six months!”

 

Or you hear these kinds of stories all the time, but very rarely does anything materialise. So I didn’t really look into it too much because I kind of dismissed it as typical Western propaganda. But after taking a serious look at what these people are saying, I think that are calling this out, it does seem that there’s no smoke without fire on this. It does seem like there’s something to there’s been a whole series of purges of high ranking members of the PLA, the Chinese military, of generals appointed by Xi, that was, Xi loyalists that have been taken out, whether they’ve died, been in prison, disappeared from public life, been forced to step down, what have you. A very large amount of these things have occurred.

 

There’s been more critique on Xi’s policies in Chinese major publications, particularly his policy on Taiwan, but also his economic policies. And yeah, the Chinese economy isn’t doing so well. They’re hurdling towards potentially a major war with the United States over Taiwan. If they play that situation in a particular way.

 

And so it would make sense actually that certain elements within the party would maybe try to assert themselves at this time. Apparently rumours were, because basically the way that the Chinese system works, every five years you have, they have like a big, you know, general meeting, like conference where all the members of the party come together and like all the senior members of the party and like vote on the direction of the party and so on. And the last time this happened was in 2022.

 

And I remember at the time it was significant because the previous president, Hu Jintao, was kind of publicly disgraced. Xi kind of ceremonially in front of all the cameras, had him kind of like marched out of the meeting. And he represents like the Communist Youth League faction, which is a faction of more moderate elements within the Chinese Communist Party. Xi’s faction is more nationalistic and militaristic and authoritarian, whereas this other faction is more liberal in the sense that obviously they’re still communists and they’re still like technically and they still support like a one party state, but they support more economic liberalisation, more capitalism, more opening of China to foreign markets, a better kind of better relationship with the United States, a less hostile relationship with the United States, and they want to maintain more kind of stability and diplomacy for foreign policy, economic policy, etc. And Xi kind of won out against them.

 

And then over the years since he became president has made a series of moves to essentially like stack the party with loyalists to him and to his agenda and kind of sideline all these other factions. And leaders of these old factions often get referred to as the so-called party elders now because they once held the highest positions in the party and are very famous in China. And you know, they’ve made note kind of in subtle ways, they don’t explicitly criticise the party or Xi, but in subtle ways they make it known that they don’t approve of Xi’s militarism towards Taiwan and kind of more aggressive and assertive foreign policy.

 

[18:45]

 

But what’s interesting is that at the, as I said, every five years they have a big meeting and then they have what they call plenary sessions, which are their like major meetings that they have once every year or like less than every year, maybe every 10 months or so, roughly speaking, I can’t remember exactly. And it’s kind of like the leaders of the party get together and decide what the direction of the party is going to be.

 

At the most recent of these meetings last year, there were all these rumours that he was sick. There wasn’t very much footage put out by Chinese State media of him really doing anything at the meeting or presiding over much. And it was presented that these party elders, so to speak, that Xi had sidelined were now involved and were talking at the meeting and were, and it was kind of spun:

 

“Oh, Xi is trying to show unity by being graceful and allowing his old fashioned rivals to come and participate in the plenary session.”

 

But in retrospect that seems like a cope, because ever since that plenary session, Xi’s public role has greatly diminished. Recently they just had like a BRICS meeting. He didn’t even go. And there’s been several big events and big meetings where he hasn’t really attended. Many are speculating he has health issues, which is probably part of that.

 

But let’s say he does have health issues. He has no obvious successor. It would make sense that that would undermine him, people’s confidence in him and his agenda. Because if he’s gonna drop dead or become too sick to be president, then the obvious question of, well, who’s going to take over from him comes into play. And it seems like elements within the elite, even though many of them were allies of Xi at one time or another, many of them have turned against him.

 

One of these, according to rumours, top military figures that have turned against him is General Zhang Yuga, which is basically the most senior kind of military figure in China. You know, basically only Xi really outranks him in military matters. He is the Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission.

 

And basically it’s the guy that’s like running the military. He’s kind of getting on a bit. He’s getting old. I think he’s in his 70s, and he was kind of in line to be potentially replaced by generals that were installed by Xi below him. And I can’t remember all the Chinese names. I’m not going to like list off all the names, but basically those guys that were kind of earmarked to kind of succeed him, and everyone was expecting to succeed him, have recently been purged. They’re Xi loyalists, which has kind of been shocking news, and many other high ranking officials across the military.

 

Meanwhile, Zhang Yuga in his public statements on Taiwan is a very different line to Xi. I can break this down a little bit. Xi’s vision on Taiwan, which is kind of nuanced and complex. So since Xi has come to power, his rhetoric on Taiwan has become progressively more and more aggressive. It kind of peaked just before Covid then it kind of let off a little bit, and then once Covid was over, it’s been even more aggressive.

 

So Taiwan, for those who don’t know, according to the official position of the Taiwanese government and the official position of the Chinese government, Taiwan is not a separate country. Taiwan is a part of China, and it simply has a different government.

 

And this is a layover from after the Second World War. You had an alliance between the old Nationalist government and the Communists, where they ceased their civil war and made an alliance to fight the Japanese in World War II. After the Japanese were defeated, they went back to fighting each other. The Communists won. Mao Zedong took over China, established Communist China. And the Nationalists were essentially chased off the mainland onto the island of Taiwan in 1949 or whatever.

 

And at first, the Americans backed the Nationalists against the Communists. This is the beginning of the Cold War, as you might expect. There was even, like General MacArthur, I believe, proposed that the United States should nuke China to try and like, nip Communism in the bud, which probably would have been the right move in retrospect. It was chosen against. There was obviously the Korean War with the Chinese kind of helped North Koreans fight against South Koreans, which were backed by the United States and us and other Western powers.

 

And so there’s a lot of tension there. And there was a view that the Nationalists could maybe somehow get a foothold back in the mainland and take the mainland back from the Communists. And the Americans backed the Chinese government in absentia that basically had formed in Taiwan, that still had ambitions to go and take Beijing back and take China back.

 

But of course, that never materialised. And this was a kind of quasi fascistic, nationalist authoritarian regime that was running Taiwan, but backed by the United States.

 

Fast forward to the 70s when it became clear that the Nationalists were never going to take China back, and the Communist Party had kind of consolidated power. Then President Nixon and his Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, they normalised relations with China and they agreed, because basically they wanted to, during the Cold War, they wanted to basically drive a rift deeper between China and Russia or China and the Soviet Union. They noticed that the Soviet Union and China, even though they were both communist states, they didn’t see eye to eye on a lot of issues. Mao in particular, was very upset after Stalin died. Khrushchev took over the Soviet Union, put out the secret speech basically condemning Stalinism as excessively totalitarian and brutal and so on. He saw this as a betrayal of Communism and of the revolution. Mao, that is, and kind of viewed the Soviets as moderates, as kind of moderates who were infected with bourgeois sensibilities or whatever. And there was territorial disputes between the Chinese and the Soviet Union.

 

[25:31]

 

And so even though they were both communist states that were aligned in many ways, they didn’t see eye to eye. And the Americans saw this as an opportunity to go in there, make a deal with China, make an economic deal with China to normalise relations somewhat, get China hooked on trade with the United States, and therefore neutralise them to isolate the Soviet Union strategically. Obviously this was an effective strategy. The Cold War was over with less than two decades later, the Soviet Union collapsed.

 

But the United States never went back to re-isolating China or didn’t perpetuate the Cold War. Even though the communists were still in power in China. The Americans declared the Cold War was over, Communism was defeated, liberalism had won.

 

And then they adopted a policy of liberal internationalism, a policy that basically, if we just integrate the countries of the world into enough international institutions that are quote, unquote, “liberal” and integrate everyone’s economies with one another through the globalisation of international trade, and we had globalised culture and everyone gets kind of draughted into this Pax Americana-Judeo, global slop of the post Cold War, you know, Pax Americana, international order. The elites of every country in the world will develop so many business relationships and diplomatic relationships and so on with the elites of all the other countries in the world, mediated by America and the West. But they’re all basically just copy and paste liberal democracy into their societies, engage in liberal, democratic reforms. Everyone will become a liberal democracy, and they’ll all sit together at the UN and shake hands and we won’t have any major World Wars anymore. And everyone’s economies will become so interdependent with one another that they won’t want to go to war because their economies aren’t sufficiently isolated that they could take each other on.

 

Instead, they’re so dependent upon trade with other countries that they work out their problems diplomatically and we all sing Kumbaya and everyone’s like a liberal forever. And there’s no more wars and there’s no more evil dictators. And this is the bullshit vision that was put forward.

 

And so even though China was still a communist authoritarian state, the idea was:

 

“Well, if we just let China, we just pretend that the Chinese are cool and allow them to participate in all international liberalism and globalism, then eventually the Chinese elite will adopt liberal ideas and engage in liberal reforms and China will liberalise over time, and we won’t have to fight China and force them to kind of succumb to liberalism. They’ll do it organically.”

 

This was the theory. And it seemed to be kind of working for a time because the Chinese leadership did get progressively more liberal. Every new leader that came in was less and less authoritarian, less and less radical in terms of their Marxist beliefs, more and more open to economic liberalism, opening up Chinese markets. They didn’t, you know, create Democratic, liberal, democratic reforms, but they were more liberal on economics and they were more open on diplomacy. They weren’t very aggressive in asserting their interests on the world stage.

 

And so the Chinese were not viewed as a major threat. And the idea was that if we just make the Chinese and American economies so integrated and dependent upon one another that China relies upon selling cheap crap to the United States and America relies upon buying all these key items from China, this will create a kind of natural friendship and alliance that prevent the two states from going to war.

 

Then along comes the rise of President Xi in the early 2010s, early to mid 2010s. And Xi is a nationalist, Xi is an authoritarian and he had more aggressive views for China’s potential. For Xi the Chinese are the centre of the world. The Chinese traditionally and there’s some truth to this. For a lot of human history, China was the biggest and wealthiest empire on the planet. You know, the Chinese empires existed for literally like five millennia or something in various forms. They’re an ancient people, an ancient civilisation, and there’s 1.4 billion of them.

 

Imagine if all of Europe was integrated into one big like super state. That’s basically what China is in terms of its size and its complexity. And the view was:

 

“Well we’ve become so rich now through all of this economic development that we’ve done that we can invest that money in developing a modern military outfit that can compete with the United States and we can assert ourselves and the United States is falling. The United States has declining internal legitimacy, all these internal problems. We can rise and challenge the American led liberal international order with an assert a different way. And we can assert Chinese interests and try to dominate the Asian region and become the most powerful country in the world and kind of replace the United States as the top dog.”

 

And key to that is taking Taiwan.

 

So why is Taiwan key to it? Well, number one, it’s kind of like a disgrace to China that Taiwan, which they consider to be part of China, is being run by a now liberal democracy.

 

So after the Cold War ended, Taiwan shifted from being a one party authoritarian nationalist state to being a liberal democracy.

 

And so the Kuomintang, the old nationalists that used to run China and that pushed into Taiwan and were running Taiwan under Chiang Kai-shek* and so on, they now had to win an election of the Taiwanese people to hold on to government.

 

[* Chiang Kai-shek-Chinese politician, military leader, and President of Taiwan from 1950 to 1975 (1887–1975) Chiang Kai-shek was a Chinese politician, revolutionary, and general who led the Republic of China from 1928 until his death in 1975. His government was based in mainland China until it was defeated in the Chinese Civil War by the Chinese Communist Party in 1949, after which he continued to lead the Republic of China on the island of Taiwan. Chiang served as leader of the Nationalist Kuomintang party and the commander-in-chief of the National Revolutionary Army from 1926 until his death, during which he was known as Generalissimo. Wikipedia.]

 

[31:58]

 

And by the time you get to the 2000s, they start losing and you get the rise of the Democratic People’s Party or whatever it is, which is basically the Taiwanese libtards. Taiwanese Leftists who advocate for bringing in immigrants into Taiwan, who advocate for gay marriage, who advocate for basically trying to join the West and adopt Western so-called Western, basically like American libtard values.

 

And also each generation that is born in Taiwan, if you look at the polling, they consider themselves Taiwanese more and more and Chinese less and less.

 

So when they started doing polling on this back in the 1990s, the vast majority of the people of Taiwan when they asked them what’s your ethnicity? They said “I’m Chinese”. Now the vast majority of Taiwanese people in particularly young people say “we’re Taiwanese, I’m not Chinese”. And a minority identifies as Chinese.

 

So the Taiwanese have begun to see themselves as a distinct people. They identify with liberal, democratic, so-called western values. And yeah, they keep getting voted back in these Taiwanese libtards. And the Kuomintang who’s like, I guess the Taiwanese Right-wing conservative like Boomer Party, they say:

 

“Let’s not upset China. Like yes, like one day there is only one China and yes, one day we’ll reunify.”

 

But they tried to kind of maintain this perpetual status quo instead the Taiwanese libtards that are in power basically kind of pushing the envelope and getting more, not outright stating like full on Taiwanese independence, but basically almost saying that. And this is a big deal.

 

Like pretty much no country in the world recognises Taiwan as an independent state. Like technically on paper. America doesn’t, Australia doesn’t. Almost no one does because the Chinese have, in order to normalise relations with them, they insist that you have to, you can’t accept Taiwan is a legitimate state. They don’t have a seat at the UN. There are so they’re in a very interesting weird position.

 

And the leaders before Xi, when he took power were kind of conciliatory towards Taiwan. Like:

 

“Yes, as long as Taiwan accepts that there’s only one China and they don’t assert their independence, we’re chill with that. And one day we hope that we can peacefully reunify into like one political system.”

 

But they weren’t really pressing the issue. In the 1990s I believe there was a dispute under the Clinton administration era there was a dispute between China and Taiwan over like I think it was when the Taiwanese held their first Democratic election. I think that the Chinese didn’t appreciate that they preferred the Kuomintang to be in power because I guess they correctly assessed that the Kuomintang was going to be more pro-Beijing than what would come out of democracy, which is a more Westernised, anti-Chinese version of Taiwan. And anyway, strongly opposed the whole election procedure, I think it was in like 1996 or something.

 

And the way that Clinton responded as President of the United States was just to send some carrier strike groups through the Taiwanese straight and say:

 

“What are you going to do?”

 

Basically. At that time, China was so militarily weak compared to the United States that they just had to cuck out and just kind of watch the United States flex on them like that. The elections went ahead and Taiwan became a democracy.

 

Cycle forward to today and China’s way more powerful than it was back then they have invested a lot obviously in building up their navy, their air force, rocket tech, etc. They’re not at the level of the United States, but they’ve closed the gap in a very big way.

 

And after Covid, I remember 2022, I think I remember like Nancy Pelosi, she went to go and visit Taiwan and this caused a big stir because she was like Speaker of the House, so she was like third in line for the American leadership at the time, below the Vice President. And she flew to Taiwan to do a visit and she was the highest Ranking, I think US official to visit Taiwan in like 25 years since the events I just described, I think basically. And the Chinese freaked out and started doing all these military drills and shooting rockets over Taiwan and flying fighter jets all over Taiwan and practicing like invading Taiwan and stuff, doing like live drills with their navy and this kind of thing. Obviously with the intent of, basically freaking the Taiwanese out, saying “don’t take any steps towards independence, like you’re ours, bitch” kind of thing.

 

And Xi, in his public statements on Taiwan or official statements on Taiwan when he first came to power, there were a lot more tame. There was an assertion that Taiwan would be reunified with China.

 

But as time went on into the late 2010s and the 2020s, Xi statements have become more forceful, saying basically that option that we’d like to do it peacefully, but there’s other options on the table. If Taiwan makes a move towards independence, will invade, basically.

 

And anyway, this is a big deal because a war, an invasion of Taiwan isn’t just an invasion of Taiwan. The United States is basically committed to protecting Taiwan. And the reason why they’re committed to protecting Taiwan isn’t just to fuck with China or because they care about Taiwanese democracy, or something. It’s strategic.

 

Basically, if you look at the geography of East Asia, where Taiwan is very key strategic real estate. Because basically all the shipping lanes that connect Japan and South Korea through Southeast Asia, to the Middle East and to Europe all go past Taiwan. If China controls Taiwan, they’re able essentially to more effectively navally blockade Japan and Korea.

 

[38:31]

 

Now, that’s significant because Japan and Korea are highly dependent upon imports by sea. Korea only has a land border with one country, North Korea, which then is connected to Russia and China. So they need access to the sea to have access to the rest of the world, basically outside of Chinese control or North Korean control, which are probably even worse from their perspective.

 

Japan has no land borders with anyone. They have to trade by sea. And Japan doesn’t have natural resources in any substantial number. Japan is utterly dependent upon importing natural resources, even importing food. I believe. They don’t actually have enough agriculture to sustain their population. There’s like 120 million people on that island. They can’t feed them unless they can get ships in and out.

 

Basically, they’re highly dependent upon international trade. So if the Chinese were to navally blockade Japan or Korea, it could bring either of these states to their knees very quickly. They could cause famines. They could completely collapse their economies.

 

So if the United States doesn’t guarantee their security, basically they would be forced to cuck to China. They would be forced to sign a whole bunch of agreements subordinating themselves to China. And that would enable China to become a hegemon over East Asia. They’d have other political and military control over East Asia.

 

And that has massive ramifications, because that would mean Australia’s position becomes precarious. All the other countries in Southeast Asia becomes precarious. A lot of them, the Philippines, Vietnam, a lot of these states would be like a cascade effect. America would lose its ability to have bases. Right now, I think the Americans have like 50,000 personnel or something stationed in South Korea. They’ve still got bases there from the Korean War that they maintain. They’ve got obviously an alliance with Japan. Japan’s the most powerful country in East Asia that America is aligned with. If they lose Korea and Japan, their whole strategic position relative to China collapses.

 

And then all these other states, like I said, would then lose confidence in the United States to defend them. They would also then cuck to China. Maybe even Australia would cuck to China at that point, because there would be this cascade effect. China would become a regional hegemon. China would grow in global prestige. China would then be able to start projecting power beyond East Asia into the rest of the world. It would be a massive shift in global power dynamics.

 

So Taiwan is one little island of like 25 million people, right? It seems insignificant, but it’s not. Because from the Japanese and the Korean perspective, if America is not willing to defend Taiwan, they’re going to lose confidence that they’ll defend them and so on, right? The dominoes go from there.

 

So the United States has to project power in the region. It has to say:

 

“No, these are our regional partners. We will fight to defend them.”

 

Because that’s what holds together the network of alliances that keeps China kind of like locked in, where all the, these island countries and Southeast Asian countries that encircle China, whether it be the Philippines, Vietnam, you know, Indonesia even, and so on, Australia, this whole chain of countries, them all being aligned with the United States, locks China out, basically. They can’t build military bases on their territories. They can’t flex over them diplomatically, politically, and so on and force them to do whatever they want because they’re the big dog. Well, the United States and the Americas can do that they can flex on Canada, they can flex on Mexico, they can flex on all the countries around them because they’re just so much more dominant and powerful. Who’s going to come and defend Mexico against the United States? Who’s going to come and defend Canada against the United States? No one.

 

So America is able to throw its weight around. That’s how China would be able to kind of behave under these kinds of circumstances.

 

Basically, yeah, there’s a whole other series of technical advantages to Taiwan. China doesn’t have, like a deep drop into the Pacific Ocean. So there’s kind of like a, … The Pacific Ocean is very deep, right, like most big oceans are.

 

But as you get closer to China, the undersea kind of ground level, whatever you call that, it raises quite significantly. So when China drop a submarine off the coast of China, it can be detected, because of the [low] depth, by sensors.

 

However, if you drop a submarine off Taiwan, you get this radical kind of cliff drop basically on the eastern side of Taiwan straight into the Pacific Ocean. So in theory, Chinese nuclear subs could, if they control Taiwan, could be dropped off the east coast of Taiwan into the Pacific Ocean and be undetectable to the United States. Meaning the Chinese could sail nuclear subs all the way to the other side of the Pacific without the United States detecting them, because they could sail them at like maximum depth the whole way. That’s pretty serious because they got nuclear subs that would provide first strike capabilities or counter strike capabilities, or whatever, in the event of a nuclear exchange.

 

So there’s a lot of key, like strategic dynamics at play over who controls Taiwan.

 

Also, from the United States perspective, if China was to move on Taiwan, they would be upsetting the regional balance of power, like I said. It would give the Americans an excuse to go to war with China. Because now they’re saying:

 

“We’re just defending Taiwan, we’re defending our allies, right?”

 

And because China would anticipate that, they would probably actually attack Japan, Korea, other states at the same time they attack Taiwan, potentially under certain kind of like war game scenarios, it’s projected.

 

[45:50]

 

So the United States, the argument goes, maybe it’s in their interest to fight China now because if you leave it 100 years or 50 years China could keep developing, developing, developing, developing, and become so militarily powerful that they’re harder to beat 50 years down the track than they are now.

 

So the idea is you kind of bitch slap them now, put them back in their place, because a war with China over Taiwan is far preferable to a war with China somewhere closer to the United States, or a war with China after they’ve already got Japan and Korea and these other states on their side and consolidated power and have grown stronger. And now maybe they’re getting involved in South American politics or they’re getting involved in European politics or Middle Eastern politics or something, and you’re fighting China in another part of the world.

 

The advantage for the Americans of fighting them over Taiwan is that it’s right in China. Basically, it’s right off the coast of China. America can send all their navy, air force, whatever, and just blow up as much in China as they possibly can.

 

And at the same time, they can navally blockade China in Southeast Asia. China is also utterly dependent on international shipping that goes through Southeast Asia to connect it to the Middle East and to Europe. China doesn’t have enough natural resources, resources to sustain itself. It doesn’t even have enough food to sustain itself. It needs to import a lot of stuff. Also, its economy is entirely built around exports.

 

So the US strategy, they don’t necessarily even have to defend the island of Taiwan successfully. They can just blow up a bunch of shit in China, try and blow up as much of China’s military hardware as possible, and then set up a blockade in Southeast Asia that stops China from basically being connected to the rest of the world through shipping, and then wait and watch as China internally kind of destabilises. And win the war that way. That would probably be their strategy.

 

So, however, if you allow China to kind of develop and all these Southeast Asian countries to become allies of China because you didn’t fight them over Taiwan, setting up that naval blockade becomes way more difficult because maybe all those states are now Chinese allies and they’re going to be enemies of the United States. They’re going to allow the Chinese to build naval installations. They’re not going to allow the Americans to bring their navy into their region or whatever.

 

So, yeah, international politics is a confidence game. If all these states have confidence in American power, they’ll back it. If they’ll cuck to China. That’s how it works. So Taiwan is just like this first domino in this chain effect of strategic ramifications.

 

Now, this is significant because ultimately the ball is in China’s court. The United States can’t force China to invade Taiwan. Maybe they could try and convince the Taiwanese to do something suicidal, like declare independence or something and really provoke it, but they can’t ultimately decide what China does. China decides what China does.

 

Now, Xi Jinping, in his kind of aggressive foreign policy, has only really been kind of pushing Taiwan away, making Taiwan fear invasion seem inevitable, getting the Americans to basically see invasion as potentially on the horizon, prepare for a war with China. Trump’s foreign policy is a large aspect of it is really geared towards containing China, like the tariff policies and so on. There’s people in the Trump administration, like Elbridge Colby, I think his name is, and others who are national security advisors who are just like China hawks, who just say that basically everything should be focused on containing China. Fuck Russia, fuck the Middle East, we should just make peace deals and forget about it and just take all of our military hardware, concentrate it in East Asia and get ready to fight China or try and deter China from going to war with us. So that School of thought is developing in the United States because of Xi’s actions.

 

And basically, the longer that the current trajectory of things, or Xi’s basically kind of led trajectory of things continues, the closer and closer World War III gets, basically. So that’s like the strategic context.

 

Meanwhile, Xi had spent years concentrating power, purging rival factions, stuffing the party full of his allies.

 

But then in the last year, you’re seeing a kind of a bit of like a backflip. A lot of his allies getting purged, his public appearances like I said earlier, being curtailed. The tone in the media, he’s getting criticised. Not openly directly criticised but getting indirectly criticised by a lot of people and then other rivals, other old heads basically in the Chinese Communist Party not directly criticising his Taiwan policy but advocating for a far more restrained Taiwan policy in their public statements, including this Zhang Yuga guy who is the 2IC [Second in Charge] over military affairs. Basically the guy running the Chinese military who’s presiding over a lot of these purges that happening to these Xi’s top guys, who basically is the highest Ranking dude in the Chinese military structure.

 

So it’s interesting because what it seems like is that however internal dynamics have been seized its hard to tell from the outside. It seems like there’s been a move against Xi. Not necessarily that he’s going to get replaced as leader although there’s some speculation that he could be literally about to be replaced. That would be very uncharacteristic. Usually they don’t. Someone’s elected to do a five year term that would mean Xi’s term doesn’t end till 2027 that it would continue. But he’s being sidelined. There was an announcement a few days ago that a so-called joint decision making body was being created at the top of the CCP and Xi Jinping, you know, has really kind of pushed for a long time. He is the leader. His interpretation of policy is the prevailing interpretation and China will be strong if basically it subordinates itself to him and his leadership. And that’s the way a lot of the top officials in the Communist Party were talking for years. Now the tone has shifted. Now they’re talking about power sharing and committees of decision makers and how everyone in the party needs to be included like the party leadership in decision making. We need to create more committees and have more what they call Democratic Centralism which basically means there’s one central decision making body but within that body you have democracy. So the Chinese people don’t have democracy but the party leadership collaboratively make decisions.

 

[51:56]

 

So they’re trying to cuck Xi, strip him of his kind of authoritarian power and kind of subordinate him to the other elements within the party. There is a rise in prominence of the so-called party elders who represent this more liberal view that I was describing earlier.

 

And the backdrop of this is also that the Chinese economy is slowing. So my view, Ron Unz put this view forward with some compelling evidence. I remember a few years ago, and I think it makes sense, is that Covid was probably a bioweapon created by an element of the United States government. I don’t know which element, whether it was a rogue element or it was directly under Trump himself ordered it to be done or what, we don’t know, I don’t know exactly. But some element within the US Government unleashed that bioweapon on China.

 

And I think it also had a secondary purpose of facilitating all these economic policy or financial policy actions where basically in the United States the economy was hurtling towards really difficult times. Covid happens they just then flood the market with all of this money to prop it up by basically bailing out all the major companies, all the major banks, basically massive wealth transfer, just giving trillions and trillions of dollars to the American financial elite. That’s basically what they did during Covid.

 

And no one was in the streets protesting it like they were after the global financial crisis because everyone was arguing about vaccine mandates and vaccines and lockdowns and blah, blah, blah, Covid shit! Because everyone was arguing about Covid bullshit, no one was arguing about:

 

“What the fuck! The richest people in the world just stole $15 trillion off us. What are we going to do about it?”

 

Well, no one did anything.

 

And I think that was basically like the psyop. Like they, it was like a sleight of hand. Like we can’t just do another 2008 style bank bailout. So fabricate this bullshit crisis that gets all the goys into this false paradigm, and we’ll have them argue within that space for a year and a half and then once we’ve transferred $15 trillion to the financial elite, we’ll just close the paradigm and then we’ll just pretend like everything’s gone back to normal. Which is what happened! That’s literally what happened!

 

There was no permanent vaccine passports or what. Remember everyone was saying:

 

“If you don’t get the vaccine, you’re going to get put in a camp and vaccines are going to kill everyone!”

 

And all this kind of stuff.

 

And obviously the vaccines were fucked up! I’m very glad I didn’t get one. And who knows what the long term effects of those things are going to be. It’s kind of scary to think about. But I think a lot of the catastrophe, the kind of catastrophism that many people had, has been shown to be false because everyone hasn’t dropped dead. There’s some evidence that it’s had an impact on fertility. I saw a study recently that about a third. It’s got like a 33% drop basically in the fertility of women who got the vax versus the ones who didn’t. Something like that, which is significant.

 

But I don’t know. I didn’t read the study closely enough to know if it was controlled for the fact that a lot of the women who didn’t get the vax are also quite conservative. So wouldn’t they be more like as a demographic, be more likely to have more children? Because you know, when I think about the kind of women I know they didn’t get the vax. Usually they’re very Right-wing, very conservative, very traditional. A lot of Christians didn’t get the vaccine because they thought it had something to do with the mark of the Beast and the book of Revelation. People who are into conspiracy theories, people who are in the dissident Right who listen to Right-wing memes. We’re the kind of demographic that didn’t get the vax, the non-conformist types. Well, we’re also probably a demographic that are more likely to have kids at higher rates because we kind of reject the mainstream programming, eat healthier, have more traditional values and so on.

 

So I don’t know if that’s all it is. Just like the vax was predominantly taken by people that are libtards and normies and they just got a lower birth rate than Right-wingers, or if there’s something actually in the vax that’s causing the fertility issue. But whatever the case may be, the consequences don’t seem to have been as catastrophic as what people were saying.

 

So while they had you arguing about that, this is what they were doing.

 

[56:35]

 

But I also think part of why they released Covid specifically in Wuhan in China is in order to basically try and slow down the Chinese economy. Because prior to Covid, the Chinese economy was growing at breakneck speed. It was growing like two or three times as fast as the United States economy and had been for decades. So China’s flying and they’re building up their military power. Xi is in power. He is the strongest leader since Mao, most consolidated authoritarian leader since Mao. Militaristic, nationalistic, getting more and more aggressive on Taiwan, more and more assertive in the world.

 

Something needed to be done to slow this mother fucker down! Boom! Covid! Drop Covid in China. What happens to Asians when they think that there’s a disease happening? They freak the fuck out! I remember like it was all the Chinese that bought all the toilet paper and stuff when Covid broke out and you couldn’t get toilet paper for months, it was a nightmare because Asians are hyper anxious people and Asians would always wear masks whenever they get sick, even before Covid. That’s part of their culture because Asians are bug people who live in giant cities full of millions of people. Disease spreads very easily in Asian societies and so they’ve culturally adapted to be more threat avoidant and neurotic about diseases than White people because we don’t live in the same kind of environments on average.

 

So it’s also why conservatives and people who live in the countryside were less freaked out than inner city like libtard cosmopolitans because they’re more like Asians. They live in these kind of more clustered environments where they have contact with more humans per day and so they’re more neurotic and so on about these things.

 

But anyway, the point is that you drop a disease like that in China, it’s going to shut down the economy. And it did that very effectively. China’s economy still hasn’t recovered from Covid, like their official figures still look kind of decent, but if you really scratch beneath the surface and you look at the underlying numbers, the Chinese economy hasn’t recovered from Covid. It’s actually slowed down to about the pace of the United States economy in terms of its growth. And yeah, there’s a lot of structural problems with the Chinese economy. Like you can see they’re claiming publicly that the economy is growing at 5% and everything’s fine. But youth unemployment is high. And look at the underlying numbers.

 

Like if you look at prices, house prices, industrial goods prices and so on, these prices are stagnating or falling, which indicates a lack of demand. So it means people don’t have money, businesses don’t have money, people don’t have money to buy houses, to invest in expanding business operations, whatever.

 

So that shows that there’s some structural problems inside the economy. You know, in China, it’s hard to trust any statistics that come out of China because there’s all these incentives to lie because they, everything’s managed by central committees and those central committees are assessed based upon these metrics. So of course they’re going to lie about the metrics to make themselves look better. And everything in Chinese, you know, culture is about saving face and not appearing weak, not appearing incompetent or whatever.

 

So I think it’s quite clear the Chinese economy has slowed down. Covid was very effective in doing that. It slowed down international trade, which China’s dependent upon. It also just literally caused all these lockdowns all through China that went on for ages. That this like zero Covid policy that persisted for a long, very long time. Their lockdowns went on longer than any other country. They were still doing lockdowns I think in 2022, when everyone else was open and back to normal. So that really fucked them up. And there’s a lot of evidence that the Americans released it.

 

Like for example, the so-called Wuhan lab where this thing was built was literally funded by Bill Gates, right? He’s a fucking American! And Anthony Fauci was like working there. Like, what’s going on?

 

Also they had the World Military games in Wuhan at the same time that Covid was broke out or was released or whatever. We know that it was a genetically engineered disease. Okay, that’s kind of quite something like the World Military Games. So like US military people were there was like 600 guys or 800 guys from the US military in Wuhan at the time when it was released.

 

So the US had people there that could have released it. And you know, there’s a lot of links to people that have links to the ruling class in America. So you know, why would, if the Chinese created a bioweapon, why would they release it in their own country? Wouldn’t you release it in someone else’s country? Like who releases bioweapons in their own country? Like that’s insane!

 

Also there were suppressed reports at the same time that it was released in Wuhan that Covid spontaneously was also released in Iran and in Russia, but it was never reported on in Western media. They just only focused on the Chinese release. That’s kind of interesting. Like the other two, like major American geopolitical enemies or whatever.

 

So yeah, I think that there was something nefarious that went on there. I think it was intentional. It’s beyond a shadow of a doubt that Covid was biologically engineered. Like that’s just confirmed at this point.

 

So the question is, who released it? Would China release a bioweapon in their own country that ended up fucking up their own economy? Or would America do it? Not only did it fuck up the Chinese economy, it greatly benefited the American ruling class.

 

So think about it. Why would China do that?

 

[1:02:34]

 

But anyway, my point is that all of these dynamics are occurring. You could see why elements within Chinese Communist Party would move against Xi because the economy is stagnating. Xi is a hardliner. Xi wants to isolate the Chinese economy from the rest of the world. Doesn’t want American cultural influence, doesn’t want foreign financial interests coming into China, gaining a foothold in the Chinese economy. Doesn’t want Chinese elites developing too close relationships with people in the West, with Western elites, and becoming disloyal to China. Right. He’s a nationalist, and that’s why he has those views. It makes sense.

 

The elements within China that support liberalisation, that want to have a better relationship with the United States, that don’t want to kind of rock the boat, have a war over, potential World War over Taiwan that could destabilise China irrevocably, potentially. They lose a war like that. Like, it could be over for the Communist Party in China who are right now, you know, elites that are doing well, that are rich, successful, whatever, have good positions in Chinese society. Do they want to go to war with America over Taiwan? Do they feel as passionate as Xi does about these nationalist policies? No! A lot of them don’t. And they make public statements that show that they don’t. So if Xi got sick, showed weakness or this weakness that he has at the moment because the economy isn’t doing so well and so on, maybe they’ve chosen this as the time to move because Xi had consolidated so much power, and that’s why we’re seeing this switch up within Chinese politics.

 

But a lot of this is speculative and kind of reading between the lines on a lot of things that people are saying in China. It will become clearer in the coming weeks and months. I think the next plenary session, the fourth plenary session in China is occurring on, like, August. That’s going to be key, seeing how that plays out, you know how Xi behaves, public statements made by other leading figures and so on, that’ll say a lot about whether Xi has been sidelined or at the very least, radically cucked in how much power he has over the Chinese Communist Party and how much other elements of the party are resurging in power and influence.

 

And based upon that, it’ll completely reset the clock on the World War III clock. Is World War III going to happen? Is a war between America and China going to happen this decade? If Xi manages to hold and reconsolidate power and this is all bullshit! Or he can turn it around? Potentially, yes. This could embolden him to go:

 

“Okay, well, I almost got defeated. Now’s the chance for the power and glory. Defeat the United States. The Chinese century beckons. I’m a great man of history!”

 

Invades Taiwan. Boom! World War III! Or Xi can’t come back from this. He’s been defeated. He’s been internally outpositioned. All these top guys are taken out. He’s basically been undermined, and it’s basically over for the Xi era. If that happens, there’s not going to be a war with Taiwan anytime soon.

 

And obviously, the big Trump tariffs that were dumped on China only exacerbated these problems, and they’ll probably go down as a strategic masterstroke, which future generations look back at this. The key is, as well, there was a recent negotiation between the Americans and the Chinese. I think it was in London or something, over a trade agreement between the United States and China, an agreement to bring down their mutual tariffs on one another and so on. What’s kind of interesting about that, Xi said nothing about it. Zero! Wasn’t involved, hasn’t made one public statement about it. It’s a pretty big fucking deal, you would think.

 

But not only has Xi not said anything about it, nobody in the Chinese government has really stated any substance at all about what was negotiated. But Trump walks away from that negotiation immediately. He is saying:

 

“I’ve secured an incredible deal and we’re going to open China up. And it’s an incredible deal with massive progress and my negotiating team, they’re the best in the world!”

 

Why was Trump so happy and why is China not saying anything? Very suspicious.

 

Some people are suspecting that it’s because basically the faction that Trump negotiated with, it’s not Xi’s faction, it’s the faction undermining Xi. And basically, until they can fully cuck go formally or get him to step down while saving face or something, they’re not going to announce the deal. So what’s in that deal? When that deal gets made public again, that’s going to be a key indication of where China is at. Because there’s no way that Xi, based upon his philosophy, his ideology, would be willing to make any concessions to the United States. You know, he’s a staunch nationalist. Whereas, yeah, other elements in the CCP absolutely would, in order to preserve economic stability, because the Chinese economy is not doing great! And their view is that the way that they gain the support of the Chinese people predominantly is through managing the economy well. They don’t have a democracy, they don’t get voted in, but they say:

 

“Qu hey, look, you don’t get to vote in your leaders. But look at the great job that we’re doing. You know, China’s constantly developing. Everyone’s getting richer, everyone’s getting more opportunities, everyone’s making more money. So don’t rock the boat. Just trust the plan!”

 

Right? And that obviously has worked for a certain period of time, but what happens when it stops working? I don’t think a lot of people in the higher ups in the CCP want to find out what happens, and I think a lot of them don’t want to go to war with the United States. I think they’re afraid, and understandably so, because they could get absolutely blasted! Like, even if they were to win, they would take a lot of damage, and it could basically set back the whole project forever. It could destabilise the Chinese Communist Party’s grip on power entirely.

 

I mean, what if the United States there’s certain dams in southern China that some analysts say if you bomb them, it could cause a flood that could kill hundreds of millions of people! If you do a naval blockade on China, it could cause a famine that could kill hundreds of millions of people! Like, the United States is over 7,000 nuclear weapons like the do you really want to have World War III against the power that’s that powerful? And when you’re that vulnerable? A lot of them probably might view Xi as a madman! And the Chinese are not risk takers. They’re not a nation of Hitlers. They’re not a nation of blitzkriegers. They’re not a nation of poker players. You know, they’re a mercantile race of Art of War, you know, Wu Wei, do nothing, win. That’s kind of like the Chinese, you know, philosophy and mentality is being conservative, being harmonious relations and all this gay shit! They don’t have the Faustian spirit.

 

[1:10:09]

 

So basically what I’m saying is that we’re probably at the on the brink here of total chudjack victory. If Xi loses his grip on power, World War 3 will not happen anytime soon. So that radically kind of changes the calculations. And that actually also, I think, explains why Israel might have decided to kick things off with Iran. The Israelis, they might have gained intelligence that China is weak. And they think:

 

“Well, if we try and escalate things with Iran now, the Americans might have more confidence that the Chinese won’t do shit over Taiwan. And so we can start forcing the issue on Iran.”

 

Basically that’s why they chose to move now, partly maybe because Trump is in power, but also partly because, yeah, maybe the China threat isn’t as imminent as as many previously thought, if Xi’s power is weakened.

 

So anyway, big dynamics, I think, like very complicated, lots of moving parts. But yeah, nothing ever happens. Nothing ever fucking happens! Yeah. Relying on China to move world history, I guess, was a mistake. I mean, think about the kind of people we’re dealing with here.

 

So anyway, I think that’s interesting and important to report because from an Australian nationalist perspective, World War III, if it was to happen, would completely change everything. So we kind of have to have our finger on the pulse of like how, like, are we at Defcon4 or like, where are we at on the, is World War III gonna happen rating scale? Because that’s a massive spanner in the works.

 

I’ll go through a few Superchats. I see Ultra Saxon said:

 

“I’d love to see you guys do a stream with Karl Radl from X. Every post of him is a gem and he’s super informative on National Socialism. Respect from England, lads.”

 

Yeah, Karl, I’ve seen his stuff. I would like to do. I think he’s more of like a Twitter guy. I don’t think he does video streams. I never seen him do a video stream before. Maybe I’m wrong, like, correct me if I’m wrong. But yeah, maybe like a Twitter space or something like it would be interesting too. I think I actually proposed that to him and then I got banned from Twitter. But make an alt account and have a conversation. If he was interested, I’d be down to discuss. Seems like his wheelhouse is World War II history and NS German history. That’s obviously quite interesting. Dan3 said:

 

“There are apparently experts saying that China has less than half their official population using salt consumption and other stats to estimate their population. Don’t know this is whether this is propaganda though.”

 

Oh, you’re saying that there’s some estimates that their population is much smaller than they say?

 

Yeah, I mean, I don’t know about that. I don’t think they’d be able to like lie about something that effectively. But you definitely can’t trust the stats you hear out of China. Megawatts 80 said:

 

“Everyone watching should send a few bucks. Hail victory!”

 

Well, I can’t disagree with that. Sector88 said:

 

“Any opinion on the Yanks reviewing the AUKUS agreement? I don’t believe we’ll be getting the Virginia subs until the late 2000s at best. No matter the a administration, unless they somehow double or triple sub production.”

 

Yeah, it, there does seem to be a great lag on that.

 

But I don’t see them ripping up the AUKUS agreement because at the end of the day it’s in the strategic interest of the Americans for us to have better subs. You know, the current subs that the Australian military has basically not going to last much longer. The old subs, they’re going to be decommissioned. We need to have new subs somehow and we don’t have a programme in place to build our own. The Americans aren’t going to want us to have no subs.

 

Also, we’re paying big money for their subs, so of course they’d like to sell them to us. And the nuclear capable subs are important just purely for the fact that, well, you don’t have to refuel. The nuclear reactor lasts like 30 years or whatever. So that’s an incredible capability where you can effectively just stay at the bottom of the ocean as long as you want. Incredible technology. So from a strategic standpoint it’s vital if we want to assist the Americans in engaging in like a naval blockade against China to have that kind of thing. There’s a reason why the Chinese freak out about AUKUS and they don’t want us having nuclear subs is because nuclear subs are effective as fuck! Like they’re incredible technology, and not that many countries have them. Ultra Saxon said:

 

“Joel, have you ever heard of the concept of a Canzak union? You see the idea amongst normie Libs, but I see it being a great long term geostrategic strategy for reuniting and re empowering the Anglo sphere.”

 

Yeah, I mean in principle I don’t necessarily think it would be so bad, but there’s a few things why I don’t think it’s realistic.

 

[1:15:44]

 

Number one, Canada is basically the strategic bitch of the United States. So being able to deal with Canada as an independent state is unlikely. Also Australia’s main allies, the United States and Britain’s main allies, the United States.

 

So this idea that we could all come together and form a union that was somehow not integrated with the United States is unlikely to be something that the United States would be too happy about. So it would only really happen if there was a massive sea change in the respective politics of our three countries. It’s unlikely that that sea change is going to be the same in all three.

 

So let’s say like nationalists, let’s say like we win in Australia. Is libtard Britain or libtard Canada going to want to make some kind of alliance with us? Probably not. And vice versa. So I don’t see it as super likely.

 

Also, there’s radically different. Like, there isn’t a lot of economic trade between the Anglo-sphere countries. Like Australia trades a lot with them. Like all three trade a lot with America. We don’t trade much with each other. Like the Canadian economy is very similar to Australia’s in the sense it has a lot of minerals and so on. We both need to trade with like manufacturing powers to like, get the most out of our economy. So like, economic integration doesn’t make as much sense as it does in say, Europe.

 

Also, we’re geographically quite isolated from one another in different regions of the world.

 

So I think, yeah, the argument is, oh, but we’ve got similar culture, similar forms of government, good relations, similar heritage. Yeah, okay, like, but why does that mean? Like, what would the union be? Just like a union where like, we’re already in a military alliance with one another, basically. Like Canada and Britain are both in NATO. Australia’s not in NATO, but we’re like a NATO partner or whatever. So like, what would it really do? Like freedom of movement? Again, like say, like we take power in Australia as nationalists. Do we want to have freedom of movement with Britain and Canada? No, because then they’re going to like flood Australia with nons. I’d rather just have an immigration policy that takes White people from those countries. So yeah I don’t really see what like the point of Canzuk Union is like from a strategic standpoint. So I don’t really see it happening.

 

But like, let’s say we took power in Australia, we would look to take over New Zealand. As well, that’s undoubtedly true. And then we would probably look to support nationalist forces in Britain as best we could. And then if we that was successful, then we’d form an alliance on those terms. Be very different than the Canzuk Union.

 

Then, like, let’s say, like our guys are running Australia and Britain and there was this idea of getting the empire back together and building an imperial federation that fuses the two countries. We could look into it down the track.

 

But yeah, it would be difficult probably because at that point, like the Australian identity, the British identity had diverged so much at that point. We’re on opposite sides of the planet, completely different strategic objectives. Like is Britain going to want to fight to the death to defend Australia’s geopolitical interests and vice versa? You know, maybe they are, maybe they aren’t. But that’s usually you get those kinds of alliances between countries that border each other. Dan3 also said. Oh no, I already read that.

 

Modern World Reject, he just hailed! Awesome! Hail you. Modern world reject said:

 

“How World War III affect nationalist politics in Australia?”

 

Well, if it was to happen, massively! Number one, the regime here would have to completely change its attitude on racism. You know, they would basically have to allow anti-Chinese racism in society because they would have to find a rationale basically to either mass incarcerate or mass deport almost, 2 million Chinese people that live in Australia. There’s about one Chinese person for every 10 White people in Australia. Like that’s how you gonna go to war with China and just allow them to walk around and be, hold high ranking positions in society and trust them like it’s not feasible. Also if you want to fight a war you need patriotism.

 

So you’re gonna have to wind back the woke shit, allow people to be kind of racist. If you’re going to want to try and convince young White Australian men to fight a World War, you can’t keep flooding their country with foreigners. You can’t keep pushing the current like ridiculously woke anti-White agenda down their throats. They won’t fight for you! They won’t sign up. So there would have to be a completely new deal made. Like the government would have to make a lot of concessions to us.

 

And I think after the war everything would be radically different. I think after a war like that, it would become defining in world history, in Australian history. The memory of World War II would fade and the whole paradigm of the post World War II international order would collapse. And it’d be a Great Reset basically. Not in the kind of Claus Schwabian sense, but it’d be like a full reset basically of ideologically, historically and so on.

 

[1:21:40]

 

And ultimately if Australia came out of it intact, I think it’d be good for nationalism. I think nationalism would grow in a post World War III Australia much more quickly and more forcefully than you know, in the current order. It’d be a great shake up, a great reality check.

 

Megawatt said:

 

“Touch on the SA political donation laws. Will this go national?”

 

I have to read up on it first. Not too aware of South Australia’s political donation laws. Rygo Weber said:

 

“Joel, will you or Blair be running as Senators in the next election? I think you would be quite effective. Thanks for the show.”

 

Yeah, we’re looking at doing something like that. Obviously we’ve got to launch the party. It’s a long time to the next federal election. You got to decide what we want to do with the state elections that happened before then. So exactly how it all fits together is a bit open ended because there’s a long way between now and then. There’s a lot to consider. Yeah, we’re gonna have a crack.

 

What else we got here. On Entropy Racist Aristocrats, he said, this is directed at Blair after last week:

 

“Blair, when Joel violates liberal norms, for example, equating the desire for a White man to marry an African with marrying a dog. Why the knee jerk reaction to sheepishly moderated. Who are you hoping to placate? Seems rather inexplicably explicably discordant.”

 

Okay, well that’s kind of funny. Says here:

 

“Joel, Cameron McGregor has a worthwhile fourth turning influence. Take positing America and Australia, by inference remains in the adolescent stage of development. He’s a coming war of reintegration of the state and national White Identity driven polarisation, catalyzing White unification and ending pluralism and disintegration. He sees Whites awakening to race, the jewish question and distrust of modern capitalism as preconditions for state transition to adulthood. You two could have a fruitful chat.”

 

Well, I don’t know who that is, but sounds good. So if he’s out there, he wants to get in touch. By all means, yeah.

 

I will say another couple things, another couple things that have been on my mind this week that are interesting to observe. So whilst you’re seeing these big kind of moves in China, behind the scenes shifting of power in America, you’re also seeing an interesting dynamic emerge where I remember when Musk and Trump had a falling out, they then kind of patched things up and I said I don’t see this lasting. Well, I think I was correct about that. Musk has been very vocal over the past week in his opposition to the so-called Big Beautiful Bill. And there’s reports that he’s going to fund Thomas Massie, who is the Israel critical Republican, the only Republican that’s not taking money from AIPAC or whatever. He’s going to fund his primary campaign because Trump is backing his opponent because Trump hates Massey because Massey’s basically not going along with the Zionist agenda.

 

So that’s interesting to see that Musk is going to step in and take Massey’s side and drive this kind of wedge between using the Israel issue to drive a wedge within the Republican Party.

 

Because as I said, Musk’s position is awkward in American politics because he’s completely abandoned the Left. The Left hate him! The Left maybe hate him more than Trump because he’s said and done maybe things that are more radical than what even Trump has done. Well, just objectively are like he’s throwing Romans and kind of statements that he’s made. But also he didn’t successfully win over Republicans. Musk is awkward, he’s a nerd. He’s not even American. And he’s kind of like a [word unclear] to Trump’s movement. Trump has organic charisma. He’s a real American. He’s beloved by the people and he’s the president.

 

So the average, you know, red blooded, Right-wing American sides with Trump against Musk. And also Trump doesn’t see himself as beholden to Musk. He sees Musk is below him in the hierarchy. Doesn’t matter how many hundreds of millions Musk kind of threw at him. Musk wasn’t able to get what he wanted out of Trump. He wasn’t able to get what he wanted out of MAGA, if you will.

 

And so now Musk is in political no man’s land. He’s the richest man in America on paper. He is entirely dependent his business models basically on American government subsidies. So he needs political power on his side. But he’s alienated both major sides of politics. So what do you do in a situation like that? Well, if you’re the world’s, world’s richest man on paper, you’re probably going to try and fund a third faction into existence. And that’s what you see his early moves.

 

So I could see Musk making bigger moves going ahead and it could be a real kind of I don’t like Musk in the sense that he, any kind of like pro-White stuff that he said to try and like win us over, he kind of like showed his true colours on the H1B Indian saga where he sided with stuffing America full of Indian H1B Visa types as opposed to preserving the White majority.

 

So that shows where he stands slike he’s not truly loyal to us or our concerns.

 

But nevertheless, when you see inter elite competition, it’s a good thing. It means that there’s dynamism in politics. It means it opens up opportunities for dissidents because you’re probably going to get more free speech, more open exchange of ideas, more dynamism in politics if you have two rival factions on the Right competing for the approval of the Right-wing masses. And what Musk showed through that whole H1B Visa saga is that he does care about maintaining a positive public image and that he has political ambitions.

 

[1:28:31]

 

So it could be a real challenger to like the Peter Thiel Donald Trump network. J.D. Vance, you know, is the heir apparent to Trump as president. If Musk can find a candidate that’s capable of taking on Vance, Vance is going to have a real challenger with hundreds of millions behind him. And I said before, if Tucker Carlson wanted to run for president against J.D. Vance, for example. I think Elon Musk would give him hundreds of millions of dollars and I think he’d beat J.D. Vance.

 

So that’s a situation to monitor as well. Big dynamics in America and China, like deep politics, elite politics that could really define what direction the wind is going to flow, going to blow over the next few years and kind of define the next decade or generation in international politics.

 

So that’s something that I noticed as well, something to keep an eye on. But an issue that I wanted to discuss as well, to kind of end the show, I guess, is I’ve got a Superchat coming. I’ll read a couple of these and then I’ll discuss this. Rabbi Shlomo Noisberg said:

 

“A hundred dollars. What do you need $90 for? I’m not going to give you an $80 Superchat to a racist, anti-semite. That $70 is mine. All right, fine, I’ll give you $60. But this is not a gift, it’s a loan and I want interest.”

 

Well, you’re not getting interest. I don’t even know who the hell you are. Dad3 said:

 

“Do you think the English will have a great man like Hitler and Napoleon in a few decades after the Civil War? Maybe three original Germanic great powers are supposed to have one after a disaster!”

 

I want to know what kind of question that is.

 

Yeah, I think that’s all the Superchats, but yeah, like one thing I want to discuss is the issue of settler colonialism. There’s been a lot of discussion precipitated, I think, by anti-Israel discourse. There’s been a lot of discussion on the Right. The dissonant Right. About the issue of settler colonialism. And there’s basically two major schools of thought. One is we should oppose ourselves to the idea of settler colonialism and talk about jewish supremacy and talk about how Israel is this horrible evil colonial power who’s stealing away land from the Palestinians. And this will help us educate White people on the jews and show that the jews are the bad guys, not Whites, and that Whites don’t want to hurt anyone. And we just want to have our own countries too. And yeah, and we can kind of focus all of the ire that’s directed against imperialism and colonialism and so on against jews and that this would be in our interest.

 

And sometimes these people say if you don’t agree with this, you must be jewish or Joel is a secret Zionist because he doesn’t agree with us.

 

The other position, my position, is that we should oppose Israel on the basis that Israel is a parasitical and subversive force of zionism, let’s say in general, because it’s not just the state of Israel, it’s also the jewish diasporas that live in our countries. They’re a subversive and parasitical force on our countries, White countries, Australia, America and particular Britain, so on. They’ve completely taken over the Right-wing. They have incredible power over the media and they use their power and influence to siphon off resources and support for Israel even though Australia and America and Britain have no strategic interest whatsoever in Israel. Like actually. They’ve captured politicians in America through incredibly nefarious means, like where they’re running paedophile networks and shit like that! They have [word unclear] like British monarchs and you know, elites from across society. Who knows how deep that goes. This is why we should oppose Israel. They’ve dragged us into wars we had no business fighting for no strategic benefit to ourselves. They taken over the Right-wing and redirect the Right-wing towards, in our countries towards their interests as opposed to representing the interests of our actual nation and people. This is what we should be criticising them for what they’re doing to us!

 

Like in Australia recently, you know, we’ve been going, doing a lot of activism and discussing a lot about the involvement of the organised jewish community and probably the Mossad in leveraging false flag, so-called anti-semitic attacks to push through an agenda to attack our free speech, to make it illegal for us to criticise jews in Israel and other racial groups as well.

 

That’s why we should be criticising jews. We should be explaining to the people of White Australians, White Americans and so on what jews are doing to them and why jews are their enemy. I think going on about like bleeding hearts about the poor Palestinians and this kind of shit is the wrong trajectory because it plays into the same moral framework that is used to describe how the poor Aboriginals and the horrors of colonialism, White colonialism or you know, the poor African slaves in America or etc. Etc, etc. It’s the same morality and framing that is used as a stick to beat the White man. And it’s generally appeals to Leftists who are anti-White, who hate the British Empire, who hate the White Australia Policy, who hate the racist founding of America, blah blah, blah blah, who hate us and everything that we stand for.

 

So to me that’s insane! The argument they make is:

 

“Well if you try and if you try and defend settler colonialism, if you say oh well, Australia was built on settler colonialism, then you’re just being the bad guy.”

Apparently you’re being the bad guy. You’re playing into the narrative of the enemy. Apparently this is what these people say. And no one’s going to support your White nationalist movement. What you have to do is say:

 

“You know what, I agree with the Left, Aboriginals were treated horribly and we don’t deserve to have this country because we’re horrible colonial occupiers!”

 

[1:35:31]

 

And somehow acknowledging all of that is going to help us to advance White nationalism. Like it doesn’t make any sense to me. It’s very simple. This country was built on settler colonialism. This country was built on our people coming here, conquering it, taking it off the people who were previously here, asserting our dominance over it, securing it for our people, fighting for it, defending it, building it up into what it is.

 

And that’s how shit works, that’s how nature works. We live in a dog-eat-dog world. Everything anyone has in this world was taken off someone else at some point. There’s a finite amount of resources on this planet. There’s not enough to go around. Some people win, some people lose. I want to win, I don’t want to lose. And when you assert your interest in this world, someone loses out. There’s never a way to be a totally nice guy and for everyone to get everything that they want. It just doesn’t work like that. That’s not how God made Earth, the universe. If you don’t like that, take it up with God. But that’s how it is, that’s reality.

 

And this idea that we need to be like 20th century liberals, we can’t assert the morality of any of our ancestors before 20th century, post World War II liberalism. We can’t say the British Empire was glorious! We can’t say the colonisation of Australia was glorious! That we can’t assert the interests of White people and White Australians just because we are White and because no one’s going to look after us but ourselves. It’s ridiculous!

 

That’s a message that makes complete sense. I believe in it. And I don’t think White people are going to be able to do what is necessary to take back control of our countries unless they’re willing to accept a message like that. I don’t think this so-called normie demographic that exists out there that is willing to be White nationalists only so long as White nationalists chungus pilled and respect everyone and don’t want to assert their superiority of everyone and want to like eke out space for everyone’s human rights and treat everyone amazingly and love everybody. I don’t think these people really exist. I think people who need to be placated to like that actually are against us and won’t embrace our politics no matter how chungus, no matter how moral fagged we make it.

 

And I also believe that the average person is capable of understanding that we live in a world of struggle. That life is struggle. That you got to fight for it, you got to fight for your existence on this planet. And that either we’re going to fight for our collective existence as a people or it’s going to be taken from us and that those are the two options on the table. We need a reality check! We need to come come to reality on this question. We can’t live in this illusion that if we just frame things with the Right moral arguments and make the right amount of concessions that we can somehow negotiate a perfectly nice and non-violent and non-controversial way for us to continue existing on this planet and to continue having our own countries. It’s the mentality of a fucking cuck. It’s the mentality of a loser.

 

We have strength as a race. Incredible collective strength! If we come together and assert our interests together. If we’re willing to come together and fight for our existence, we can secure it. That’s what it comes down to.

 

And I’m not going to forsake the incredible actions of my ancestors. I’m going to venerate them. What they did to create this country. Stealing countries of other peoples is something that few peoples are actually capable of I don’t consider it to be an immoral thing, I think you either fight for it or you don’t deserve it. If we lost World War II to the Japanese, if we ultimately one day lose this country to other races, other forces, ultimately we’d have no one to blame but ourselves for not fighting with enough valiance, for not mustering enough strength and power to hold on to what is ours. We have to take responsibility to secure our own future. No one else on this planet owes us anything and we don’t owe them anything. That’s reality.

 

And I want to live in reality. I don’t want to live in this fucked gay ideological delusion that some people in this movement want to live in. And I don’t want to pretend to believe things I don’t believe.

 

A lot of people say:

 

“Hey, look man I don’t really believe this shit either, but it’s going to help us make jews look bad or it’s going to help us win over moderates to our position if we just pretend to believe in it.”

 

I don’t believe in pretending to believe in shit! Pretending to believe in shit is inauthentic. It’s not how we’re going to convince people to stand side by side with us and fight for an objective, is pretending to believe things we don’t believe.

 

The way that we’re going to get men to stand behind us and fight to believe in our cause, believe in our movement, is to actually believe what we believe and say it proudly and openly! To have faith in our ideas, that our ideas are inherently have so much truth and potency and value that they will succeed. That’s how we’re going to win!

 

And yeah I’ve had this argument before with people. They say:

 

“Oh, I’m a universal nationalist. I believe in nationalism for all people.”

 

Well, that’s a nice thing for you to say. So are you going to go and fight for Algerian nationalism? Are you going to go and fight the Sri Lankan nationalism? No, you don’t actually give a fuck about Azerbaijani nationalism or Venezuelan nationalism. You say you believe in everyone’s right being equal to having a nation, but you’re not willing to fight for everyone’s nation. You’re willing to fight for your nation and maybe some brother nations that you have.

 

[1:42:01]

 

So maybe if you’re an Australian, you’d be willing to fight for Britain because that’s the land of your ancestors. You’re willing to fight for Ireland or whatever. If the Americans had a civil war, you’d be willing to go and fight for the White team because they’re our ethnic cousins or something like that. Okay, that makes sense.

 

But if you aren’t really willing to fight and die for it, you don’t actually believe in it, to any significant or deep level that it’s of consequence.

 

So why can’t you just say you’re an Australian nationalist and just say you want to fight for a White Australia? Anyone who has a problem with that, you want to crush them. You want to crush them and destroy them because it’s us or them! That’s what we believe in. Why isn’t that good enough? Good enough for me.

 

Maybe it’s not good enough for you’re a liar. Like, you’re just a liar. You don’t actually really believe what you’re saying. You’re trying to come up with a strategy, like a marketing, like a moral marketing strategy where you pretend to have this morality that’s nice to everyone so that people will allow you to have your own country or something. It doesn’t mean that we should have like zero allies or zero respect for other people. But let’s be real here. Why can’t you’re asserting your own interests in your own and the future of your own people?

 

Like and for example, in Australia, we have a military alliance with Japan. The Japanese are a completely different people. I think the Japanese are an incredible nation, incredible cultural achievements, whatever. I wouldn’t fight for Japan unless it was in Australia. I’d fight for Australia if we were like allied in a war together and it made sense, it was in our interest to fight together against a mutual enemy. But I wouldn’t fight for Japan. I don’t think it would be a good thing if Japan was like, wiped off the face of the planet necessarily. I think they’re interesting, cool people. But I wouldn’t be willing to die to save Japan. So I can respect Japan. Maybe we could have an alliance with Japan if it’s in our interest. But I’m not a Japanese nationalist.

 

I don’t ultimately believe in some metaphysical right that the Japanese have to exist. Ultimately, it’s the responsibility of the Japanese to secure their own existence, and it’s the responsibility of White Australians to secure our own existence. And it’s the responsibility of Palestinians to secure their own existence and the responsibility of whatever group of people it is to secure their own existence on this planet. That’s how it works. That’s the iron Law of Nature. So Modern World reject said:

 

“We cannot negotiate for our existence. We must secure it through struggle.”

 

And he hailed and yeah, that’s basically the essence of my view. Someone said here:

 

“Joel didn’t get the Rabbi Noseberg meme.”

 

No, I did get the meme. I just didn’t think it was that funny. So I did like a kind of deadpan delivery.

 

Now, what else have we got here? I think that’s basically a good show for the evening. So give me some feedback. Did you still enjoy the show, even though it was just me riding solo? Don’t usually do this. I usually have the foil of having someone to talk to. It feels a bit weird just sitting here speaking into, like a laptop. Like, not talking to another human being. Feels a bit inorganic. But I’ve been doing this a long time, so I could still kind of sell it, I think. Jack Brady, given some respect:

 

“Excellent monologue.”

 

Well, I appreciate that. Friend of the show. Obviously been on the show before. High praise.

 

But, yeah, everyone’s seemed to enjoy the stream, so I’m glad you watched. I’m glad you listened. And yeah, got some things coming up. There was an interview by this guy called Hermes from the United States. He does like these street interviews that have been going viral lately. He’s obviously like a nationalist from America. Seems like a solid dude. I haven’t really spoken to him much before, but he interviewed Tom earlier this week, which you can find, I think, on Rumble. And we’re doing a collaboration soon. I’ll put out on my social media on Telegram, when we’re gonna go live. I think soon. I think maybe like Sunday, Australian time, Saturday night American time was the plan. But, yeah, I’ll put it out when it’s all, like, ready to go with links and stuff.

 

And I’m also going to do a collaboration with Ferryman from Canada next week. I think there’s a new Codex India documentary that’s going to be released. And they wanted us to do a kind of Watch Party promotion. The previous one was pretty funny. It was kind of like this David Attenborough narrating, like Pajeets in the Wild. I’m sure a lot of you have seen it. So anyhow, I don’t know what to expect. [chuckling] I haven’t seen it yet, but should be funny.

 

And yeah, there’s a few other things happening. So keep an eye on social media, keep in touch and we’ll fill you in on when we’re doing more content when we’re doing more activism, etc. And if you’re in Australia, join the fucking movement! ! WhiteAustralia.org, WhiteAus.org. If you don’t want to come and be a member of the NSN, marching around on the street, doing street activism, you can join and just come to the community events. You can come and train with us. Kickboxing, weightlifting, barbecues, seminars, we’re putting on more events. Come get involved in the community. At least get networked with fellow White nationalists.

 

And if you don’t even have time for that, at the very least, sign up as a supporter. Put your name down so we can get registered as a political party. We’re getting closer and closer to hitting the target. We haven’t even done an official launch yet. We will get more than enough signatures. Be a member of the party. We need members. So at least sign up as a member or even better, come and join the community. Come and get involved in a more direct capacity. A lot of events are going to be organised through the rest of the year.

 

[1:49:04]

 

The only way that we can turn around the political situation in this country is if White nationalists in Australia come together, join the Organisation, join the party and build a movement that can actually change things. We have the foundation of a movement that has the potential to really make an impact, which we haven’t had in this country for a long time. We’ve created that foundation.

 

The only way that that foundation can go into something actually tangible, making like, real, meaningful change is if everyone gets behind us and backs us. Even if it’s just as simple as just signing up as a member of our political party, which really is not asking for very much at all!

 

So WhiteAustralia.org. Sign up! Join up! You know, don’t you want to see us enter politics in Australia? Wouldn’t that bring you joy? Wouldn’t that be fucking awesome? Like, oh, you don’t want like me and Blair and Tom and shit running for office. You want to fucking vote for, who you voting for? Craig Kelly? You want to vote for Ralph Babet? You want to vote for Pauline Hanson? This shit sucks, man! Help us give awesome candidates! Our policies are going to be amazing! We’re going to break the fucking news cycle. We’re going to have the most interesting political party probably in the whole world. Fucking why have you not signed up yet? Sign up, help us win!

 

But yeah, anyway, so that’s the end of the stream. I hope you enjoyed it. And White power, blood and honour! Hail victory! See you all next time.

 

[1:51:06]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/11/2025 = 35)

J0hnC0nn0r
6 days ago
There is no question, they all need to leave
9 likes

Report
J0hnC0nn0r
6 days ago
You know why they removed the death penalty. Because if they used it in this case then it would be injected into the public consciousness as a solution and then the sheep might get ideas about applying it to other criminals.
7 likes

Report
JoshRecessionberg
Supporter
6 days ago
Society is falling apart with Jewish ‘democracy’
6 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
J0hnC0nn0r
5 days ago
Lets state the obvious
0 likes

Report
Lynchmob11
5 days ago
Awesome show. You should do a weekly solo show where you break down geopolitical events, since the other show is mainly centered upon Aussie politics.
5 likes

Report
SueNewson
5 days ago
you done a great job!
5 likes

Report
natogroyper
5 days ago
Great show, these type of shows that you do where you break down geopolitics from a Australian nationalist perspective are brilliant and its important. It’s something that we need more of. You really come into your own doing this type of content mate
5 likes

Report
leibekohne
6 days ago
Usury free world economy will solved lots of problems including wives staying at home. Also the wars will disappear no financing jew banks. In modern world China has never necessary ability to fight a long war. They could do nothing against small Japan. If that should happens the will end of humanity. Those problems, can be overcome by changing the communist China into Monarchy as used to be.
4 likes

Report
StevenGurr
3 days ago
Kill all pedo fags
3 likes

Report
katana17
6 days ago
[Joel Davis – Nothing is Happening, But It Will – Jun 26, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/06/28/joel-davis-nothing-is-happening-but-it-will-jun-26-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss ZOG vs Iran, Mark Latham vs Minns, the caravan hoax, Trump jews and Epstein, Israel with 200 nukes, JFK assassination, boomers being selfish, Holohoax Card wearing out, WWIII with China vs ZOG, jews not being flashy, Joel dreams of an Aston Martin, miscegenation, Human rights, NSN childcare policy, and current events, etc. – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 21,471 – Duration: 125 mins]
2 likes

Delete
J0hnC0nn0r
6 days ago
I dont agree with your idea to pay the mothers to stay at home instead of childcare, as that doesnt address the root cause of why the wahmen are working in the first place. Usually to pay for the usury loan and every other fucking rip off corporate swine and their small hat masters are perpetrating on the White race. Anything that undermines the ponzi scheme, aka forcing a collapse is the only option.
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
JoshRecessionberg
Supporter
5 days ago
You are a fool. Who is going to support a party advocating for an economic collapse? It is more like an economic transition that will have to be done smoothly and professionally in order to reinvigorate White Australia. Implementing policies in phases is the best approach. Talking about collapse is for low IQ blackpilled degenerates.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
J0hnC0nn0r
5 days ago
Sure thing fuck wit. Lets move jew money for daycare to middle class welfare, banksters dont care they still get their usury bucks, inflate property prices based on the extra income and keep the ponzi scheme going. Just to stick to your ad hominem attacks and idiocy, you clearly are a stupid zoomer cunt rash because this shit was done under Howard and led to much of this fucking mess. The fact you still think this is a viable “policy” when the same Whites sucking off the govt tit will turn on NSN etc when the welfare tap is turned off (transitioned as you put it like a tranny) truly shows how stupid and short sighted you are.
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
1Antonius
3 days ago
People are too degenerate to play moderate with them. They’ll still betray you, it’s in their nature.
0 likes
Report
leibekohne
6 days ago
therefore NSN you must stop drinking even beer drink Kombucha instead. Never slacken be vigilant You must be hard, strong without any remorse and it will require blood, because you waited to long, because you let yourselves your parents to be fooled whilst the internal enemy never stopped only intensified after WW2 He mesmerized us and made us imbecilic morons murdered us lied to us stole from us killed us used us exploited us destroyed us to merely 6% of world population and going down faster and faster to total distinction of Aryan goyim white race wake up shiksa cunts and fight; teach abusive fanatical communist police a hard lesson, give it back.
2 likes

Report
MPCV
Supporter
6 days ago
o/ HH
2 likes

Report
JFurM
Verified
4 days ago
To your point Joel, on the study that covered the 33% drop in fertility of women who go the jab vs those that didn’t… as a woman who previous to Covid, had no fertility issues, I stared having lots of issues with my cycle as well as miscarriages as soon as the vax came out. My husband and I did not get it but most all of our family members did. This is an experience that many other women (not vaccinated) I have spoken with share in common. Potentially due to vaccine shedding and or what they’ve been putting in our water (I.e. Dr Ardis’ work shows this). Either way, agree with what you said about the massive wealth transfer that was going on during covid, and it eerily all began in nov of 2019. Very few people were talking about what was going on with all the major corporations and financial elites at the time. They definitely took advantage though to hurt us health wise, in our economy and as a society. Hopefully enough are awake now to not get fooled again! Great show!
2 likes

Report
Bigboy6669
5 days ago
bump
1 like

Report
palacepony
Supporter
6 days ago
Wuhan Institute entered a partnership with Peter Daszak/ Ecohealth Alliance. Special Cancer virus programs, ‘defense’ programs, theres beeb decades of work on G.O.F virus manipulation. See pizzapicklespur on X, also Charles Rixey (prometheusshrugged.org.) See Major Murphy’s release of the D.E.F.U.S.E document. Rixey will take you there. Research into Covid amyloidogenic properties continues @ mccairndojo.com. Support the doc; https://rumble.com/v6uyxpb-lab-updates-synthesizing-amyloidogenic-fibrin.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
6 days ago
https://t.wtyl.live/videos/browse?s=1
0 likes

Report
palacepony
Supporter
5 days ago
succinct overview; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OHBkkZeqms
0 likes

Report
TripleGas
Verified
5 days ago
need to kick out and block nons from entry before implementing anything like paying for mothers to stay home or it’s just another incentive for them to come and breed.
0 likes

Report
Kroninn
Supporter
5 days ago
Taiwan has around 2 million private gun owners. I dont think it would be too easy for China to invade them. Especially with the Philipines and others helping them.
0 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
4 days ago
Colac constitutional restoration conference in Colac upcoming late July; https://rumble.com/v6vqyl7-2-seminars-26th-27th-july-augusto-zimmermann-darren-dixon-and-tim-dwyer.html
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Trump is not American either. His mother is from Scotland. And his father could be a German jew if you look at Fred Trump’s physiognomy. Trump is also a New Yorker.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Trump is not founding stock American like us that have been here since the 1600s.
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Israel sucks at colonization. Look at a settler colonial nation that was White, and had no outside funding. America, Australia, Canada. Jews have all the money on the world and still can’t make a nation larger than new jersey.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Jews are the laziest parasite bastards ever known. They should have listened to Hitler when he said they can live comfortably on Madagascar, but they resisted, now their final fate will be worse.
0 likes

Report
amacc14
Supporter
4 days ago
Democracy is fake and stupid. Listen to us, we’re sitting around, brainstorming how to get VOTES. Pathetic.
0 likes

Report
localsussybaka
4 days ago
The political analysis gets more compelling each day.
0 likes

Report
MattOosty
3 days ago
A stream/space with Karl would be amazing
0 likes

Report
PhooeyPhoxide
21 hours ago
Joel overrates the CCP. They can’t even take Taiwan. No way China is even going to put a dent in the New World Order.
0 likes

Report
BrossefStalin
5 days ago
Blair is so fragile. Always talking about how tired he is or how he feels weird. He had to get up early and it took him over the edge? Man up
-2 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer: Greetings. Good day. Good afternoon. Hello, wherever you are. Today’s date is August, 24, 2024. This is episode nine of The Flip Side with Monika. And I am your host, Monika Schaefer. Before I introduce today’s guest, I’ll give you the phone numbers to call after the bottom of the hour. We like to invite guests or callers to call in. And those numbers are 512-248-8252 or 1800 313 9443.

 

Okay, today’s guest is Grace Eki Oyama. And I’ll just give you a brief, a story of how I met Grace Eki. And this was back in 2015. So nine years ago almost. I attended the trial, the speech crime trial of Arthur Topham in Quesnel, British Columbia, Canada. And there I met some very interesting people.

 

And one of the people I met was Grace Eki Oyama. And it turns out she had attended other such trials and was very, very knowledgeable in many things.

 

And at that time we were talking about World War Two history, those kinds of things. The kind, the very subject that I got into some trouble with the powers that should not be, the Holocaust subject and all those things. So Grace Eki Oyama has been in this for a long time.

 

And today we’re going to talk about some other subjects a little bit different from that. But I’ll just, before I bring her on, I will just say that in my Chatango site, this is the chat room. And how you can find that chat room, it’s all spelled out The Flipside W Monika. So instead of with. It’s just a W.

 

So the Flipside W Monika Chatango. That’s Chatango. Chatango. Chatango.com. And I posted a video. It’s a five minute short video. It’s called The World Owes Germany an Apology for World War Two. And that’s a video of Grace Eki, who made this very brilliant and succinct little five minute talk, which was this apology.

 

And so I’ll let her talk a little bit about that too, because we were just revisiting that a few minutes ago. But the subject we’re going to talk about today are about musical frequency. And people have probably heard about 440 being the standard tuning for A and many people these days are aware that perhaps 432 might be a better frequency. So that’s one of our subjects.

 

And the other subject, and I had put this into the show notes, if you’re going to find this in the archives, is on the three stages. This is a Japanese philosophy about the three stages of development, childhood development. And I will let her just discuss that at length. So, Grace Eki, are you there?

 

Grace: Yes. Hello, Monika.

 

Monika Schaefer: Welcome.

 

Grace: Thank you.

 

Monika Schaefer: Would you like to start about this, the title of that video? Because we just talked about that a few minutes ago.

 

Grace: Yes. Because often it’s not me who put the title, but what I wanted to say. And if you. The idea was war is war. And then I feel that the world does owe an apology for what happened to the Germans, actually, after the war, how they were treated, and also the fact that there is no real official peace treaty, and the expellees, et cetera, et cetera. I think that’s very important for people to know and understand, because it leads away for the problem in what’s happening now in Palestine. There is a similarity, but the fact that it is not known at all, it’s a shame, because it’s things that, oh, including the Nuremberg, which was not a real trial, nor was it very fair.

 

And so that was the part that I wanted people to be at least conscious of.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, thank you for that. Just clarifying that that wasn’t, you know, our main subject today. But it does give the audience, the listener, a little bit of background about first of all, I explained how I met you was at this speech crime trial. And why don’t you give a little bit of a snapshot about background of yourself? I know you’ve done many things. You’ve lived in many places. You’ve been a writer, you’ve been a translator.

 

Can you just give maybe a couple of minutes, a bit of background of yourself?

 

Grace: Well, a couple of minutes.

 

Monika Schaefer: Maybe that’s not possible! [chuckling]

 

Grace: Once we get into the detail, we can go all over. But maybe, just as an honor to my father, I just want to add the fact that my father participated in World War Two. And the fact that he is a martial artist of karate.

 

So I wanted to say that you are brought up in a different environment than if my father was a banker, or a businessman, or a Professor, let’s say. And that was one thing.

 

And then later on, I worked with this researcher, a Japanese researcher who would also make history on his own. But his name is Ryu Ota. And Ota is the one who got me very much interested in, … Well, what really happened was when Eustace Mullins came to Japan, there was a presentation with a professional translator. And the translator, I realized, wasn’t really translating, not accurately. And it was about 9/11. And whatever Mr Mullins was saying, basically, she was translating it the opposite. I almost thought she could be a saboteur. But later on, I understood this, that we, first of all, in Italian they say, “translator traitors”. “Traditore, traditore”. Because it can’t be helped because you can only translate something that you understand. So she wasn’t, I feel, purposely doing that. But from her standard of knowledge and common sense, the alternative so-called conspiratorial theory sounded so absurd, I think she just couldn’t digest it and kind of purified the translation.

 

[08:40]

 

Monika Schaefer: Wow! And when you say 9/11, you’re talking about 9/11, the events of September 11, 2001, right?

 

Grace: Correct?

 

Monika Schaefer: To clarify, yes. Oh, that’s very interesting.

 

Grace: Well, he said a lot of interesting things, but she was diluting it down.

 

But anyway, so what I did was I wrote out what Mr Mullins said and what the translator said, and how I would have translated what I feel he really said. And I showed it to Ota. And ever since then, he’s asked me to basically become his translator. And through him, I met really not just Eustace Mullins, but he had more than 13 books by John Coleman translated into Japanese. Now he’s famous for the Committee of Three Hundred. He also, I think, was the first to talk about Bohemian Club and Bilderberg. I was also his translator when David Icke came two times when Ota called David Ike to Japan, for example. And he would have called Webster Tarpley. But unfortunately, he became ill and died. And that was about 2009 anyway.

 

So that taught me very much. That’s how I found out a lot about true history in the West. Yeah, true history in the West.

 

Despite this slogan of “democracy and freedom”, there really wasn’t., … You know, one of the reason about Arthur Topham’s trial is like, do we really have free speech? And ever since I found out about Zundel.

 

Monika Schaefer: Ernst Zundel.

 

Grace: Yes. And when the court in Canada, when the court judged that “truth is no defense”, I was so shocked! Because, well, how else are you expected to defend yourself? Yes, I just found it so absurd!

 

And I think that is, at least in, as far as Canada is concerned, that was when things started to crack. That was like the beginning of the cracking of the justice system.

 

And the other thing is that I really, honestly believe in freedom of speech. Even for your enemies, even for things that you don’t like. Because that’s the only way. I don’t want to sound like cliche, but the only way to peace is through negotiation and through diplomacy and so forth. And it saddens me also to see what is happening with Ukraine and Russia, too.

 

But instead of diplomacy or negotiation, basically a dialogue, it seems that the world has gone mad, and it’s like more money, more arms, more of the things that’s, more sanctions more of the things that’s really not a solution or working!

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. And I would say the really important element is deception. Right? In all these things that are happening.

 

Grace: Well, like, I think we would all agree that without deception, war is not possible, that war is propaganda!

 

Monika Schaefer: I’ve never heard anybody say it that way. That’s really, really good! That’s profound. I would say. [chuckling]

 

Grace: Thank you.

 

But I also think you have to demonize the enemy, because if you had one drop of sympathy, imagination, or compassion, you really could not have war.

 

So you have to demonize or as an “alien”, I say alien in quotation Mark because it can mean many things, but something so foreign and different and something to be demonized! And I’m sure you would understand.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

And, I mean, otherwise you wouldn’t have all these soldiers going and killing people who look like them, especially all these brother wars. Cousin wars.

 

Grace: Yeah.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. For sure. So, Grac Eki, that’s really very, very good! Thank you. I didn’t know how your beginnings were in translation, but that’s how you met all these people and then learned a lot about true history. And then I know that you were a writer for a while, I think, at the American Free Press.

 

Grace: No. Well, I had a job with them at the Barnes Review for a while, but it was very short. It was work, but that’s how I managed to go to Palestine in Israel.

 

So I am very appreciative of their help at that time.

 

Monika Schaefer: Right, right. Okay. Well, would you, do you feel ready to jump into the first of our subjects that we., … And the reason we’re going to talk about this, people might say:

 

“Well, why? This is kind of unrelated to anything else.”

 

But Gracie spent a few weeks with me a month or so ago, and we, of course, had time to talk about lots of things.

 

And I like to play music, and we talked about these frequencies. And generally, people, the standard tuning is for A is 440.

 

Now, anybody who plays and tunes up their instrument, they’ll know that.

 

Now, we talked about this other frequency, A 432. And I was just delighted and surprised to hear Grace Eki talk about this because you revealed to me that a lot about this.

 

And so I thought:

 

“Oh, well, we have to talk about this on the show.”

 

[chuckling] So tell us a little bit about how did that come to be that this frequency of 440 was pushed upon us. I think that’s what we had talked about when you were here.

 

Grace: But Monika, it’s not always 440. It can be 442. And I have heard of 446, so it isn’t always 440 either. It can even be higher.

 

Monika Schaefer: Well, I’ve heard that there are some orchestras that in Europe, for example, who are pushing to have the 442 tuning, and it’s just kind of tightening things up.

 

I feel like it’s tightening up a tight wire and to the bursting point or something. So go ahead and talk about the history, perhaps.

 

Grace: I would also say from 1980 to 85, I was in Italy actually studying music, you see, and around that time, there was also this revival of Baroque music and original instruments.

 

So I was always interested in this. But in order to save time, I will be a little bit practical.

 

I happen to be very, very fond of the Italian composer Verdi. This is also called La Verdiana, meaning Verdi’s A, meaning. He thought this was the best that it should be. This was the best pitch. So I assume that was the pitch he was writing in.

 

[16:13]

 

Monika Schaefer: Sorry, which was the best pitch?

 

Grace: Well, it depends how you count it. But basically 432.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Grace: If you want to really get into the science and all this is actually supposed to be like 430.8 or something, but because it depends how you count it from, the, C equals 256.

 

But in order to simplify, I also, later on, I knew, have you ever heard of Schiller Institute in Washington, DC?

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Grace: But anyway, there was a politician called Lyndon Larouche and his wife Helga, who is German. She heads the Schiller Institute. They only doer. Music and performances in a A equals 430 or 432. And from their Institute, if you Google, you can see musicians actually performing for you in two different pitch. I was lucky. I tried to look for some of the things that I managed to experience a long time ago, but not everything is on the Internet still, and I couldn’t find it.

 

So I’ll tell you one radio program with Carlo Bergonzi, but he was like the Italian star tenor. And in that radio program, he actually has three, like, graduate students in music singing opera arias in both pitches.

 

And all of them said that it feels so much natural to sing in 432 as opposed to 440. And Bergonzi would explain why he feels that is. I also, …

 

Monika Schaefer: Can you tell us a little bit about that? Why that is? Why does it feel better?

 

Grace: Well, first of all, I think you are getting, apparently the standard for classical music was about 430, 32, definitely until the fifties with Fruk Wengler [sp].

 

Now, you know, there are many people who like retro recordings. Could there be a possibility that the pitch does also influence? Is one.

 

And the other thing is that let’s try to get nearer to the composer’s original intent.

 

And the other thing is that without going into too much detail, we have chest and middle voice and high voice.

 

Now, if you, if the tuning is too high, your voice register changes at the wrong place, and that may not reflect correctly with the words that’s meant to be colored. Before you go and ask me, let me just add, I was also fortunate enough, … So there was a time when these musicians were actually doing presentation, like Norbert Brining. He was like the head of the Amadeus Quartet, and he actually played Bach Partita in two tones right in front of you, and you can feel the difference.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes.

 

Grace: Now, at the same time, I also want to tell you that there are people who like brilliant, who don’t like, who prefer the more brilliant tilling sounds.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Grace: And, but anyway, Verdi lost. Why? Apparently the Russian military equipments were already tuned higher and it, they can be more penetrating and they can be heard much better at distance. So for like, military bands in the 1800s.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Grace: That was their preferred pitch.

 

Monika Schaefer: I just want to, if I may jump in, for people who have not heard about this and they might think, well, why don’t you just play in a different key? That’s not actually what happens with this different tuning. It’s not just simply playing in a lower key. Like instead of C being C, go to B flat or something. That’s not what’s happening. This frequency is, I would say it’s less than a quarter tone or something. It’s really just a change in frequency. And it literally just is., … It’s something that we, … We all have a vibration. We all have a frequency. Everything around us is vibrating at a frequency. And the 432 frequency for the A is, to my knowledge, a more natural frequency that we simply, our bodies will vibrate more naturally to that.

 

So that’s the important point to make here. Otherwise people will say:

 

“Well, why don’t you just play lower, play in a lower key?”

 

[chuckling]

 

Grace: Just like when you change the tonality, the coloring of the piece changes. It’s a very subtle difference. But I would just say that for people interested, try looking for this kind of experiment that was done where they would switch the pitch, and you can also see what you, how you feel.

 

And as a last comment on this, I want to add that when I changed my piano tuning to 432, my daughter, who was in kindergarten, said:

 

“Much more relaxing!”

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Grace: That was the key for me.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes. So I did that once, Gracie Aki. I paid the piano tuner extra because it took longer, and I got him to tune my piano down to 432.

 

But then my next music jam, when I was asking all the musicians to tune their instruments down the guy with the twelve string guitar, [chuckling] and they didn’t appreciate it! [chuckling] So it didn’t work out. Well, that’s the problem. When we have this standard tuning that everybody’s tuned to and when we’re playing with people, we have to come to the agreement where we’re going to be tuned at. And what about accordions? I mean, all these instruments are tuned to that certain frequency.

 

So that’s a little bit of a, just a technical problem with this.

 

But it’s an interesting subject, and I do hope that maybe we’ll get some callers after the bottom of the hour on that subject.

 

I mean, I don’t want to be sounding like we’re jumping around one subject to another, but I think these things all kind of do relate back to us because it’s like we’re being, you know, damaged or assaulted on all fronts, and this is one of them. I do think that the musical frequencies is just another way that those who wish us harm are, you know, degrading us and this kind of thing. But unless you had something more that you wanted to talk about that.

 

[23:25]

 

Grace: Well, yeah, let me ask you, more for people can also try and find things, but 432 mathematically is two to the fourth power times three to the third power. And I have seen documentation how it corresponds with many other amphithegorian numbers.

 

But we don’t have time to really go into that. But I feel like, and before we go into that, let me, can I give you my favorite quote of Mozart, which is that he said:

 

“Music is painted on the canvas of silence.”

 

And that’s the other thing we are lacking. We don’t have enough silence!

 

And the other thing is that I think there is, music is used especially, … How can I explain this? Okay. Records used to, the sound would come in waves.

 

And I’m not so sure about the cassette, but I think it’s still rather relaxing compared to the CDs, all this digital sound, they actually come in square blocks exactly like in the computer screen. If you enlarge it’s made from little squares.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes. Pixels and pixels, right?

 

Grace: Correct. And it’s the same thing with music. You break it down into blocks and then you remake it, but it’s in blocks as opposed to waves. This is my personal comment, and I’m very much interested if anybody else ever felt the same, but I don’t listen so much to CDs anymore. It hurts my ear after a while.

 

Monika Schaefer: That’s so interesting. There’s a real resurgence in people buying records. Records, actual records, because it is a different quality of sound. It really is. And I’m sure that many people are nodding their heads as we’re speaking about this. For sure. For sure.

 

And that quote, because I just interrupted just when you were saying it was Mozart, did you say?

 

Grace: Yes. It’s hard to find the original, so I cannot guarantee.

 

But it’s supposed to be something he wrote in a letter.

 

Monika Schaefer: I think it’s very apt. We do need silence, and it’s Sorely lacking. [chuckling]

 

Grace: And [chuckling] the fact that it’s only beautiful because there’s the pause is one. And second. Mozart was like a kind of child prodigy that can say:

 

“Oh, the birds are Twittering in G major.”

 

For example, and I think he could hear natural sounds and decipher them better than many of us.

 

But I think that’s one of the reasons why his work is so eternal. And it seems to, … I’ve read research is how it increases the IQ of children.

 

Monika Schaefer: Oh, yes.

 

Actually, that’s a very good point. People say if you have Mozarte while you’re studying, you do better on your exams! [chuckling]

 

Grace: Interesting! No? And so but shall I, … Let’s move to the next.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, I just found this was the most interesting thing. And we’ll just have a couple of minutes before the bottom of the hour to touch on, but we’ll continue after the break. But you had talked to me about this Japanese. It’s a philosophy about the three stages of childhood. Go ahead.

 

Grace: It’s like a seven year cycle, but actually it corresponds very well to what Rudolph Steiner felt and thought, at least as far as education is concerned.

 

But this is the way I interpret. Well, in Japan, you are not adult until you are 20.

 

Monika Schaefer: Or 21? No? Because you said three times seven. The seven year cycle. Yes?

 

Grace: Well, although let’s say in the year that you will be 21, you are officially an adult. And it seems strange because if it’s just physical, you seem to have matured much earlier on. But apparently research has shown that human brain takes that long to genuinely finish maturing and growing, 20 years.

 

And the other thing I was trying to say is that, okay, for the first seven years, you’re just growing physically and you need a lot of physical activity. And then seven from 14, then you get your education in grammar and the basis. And then from, like, 14 till later, it’s, I think it corresponds to the classical concept of rhetoric. You know, grammar first, dialectic first, and then rhetorics. But it also, I don’t know exactly where and how I got this idea, but you’re physically, maybe even a 14, 15, you’re more or less done.

 

But as far as the concept of philosophy, physics, abstraction, spirituality, that kind of realm, you really don’t understand, you have to be at least 14, more or less. You know, we all have, like, I’m not talking about child prodigies or exceptional people. But usually it takes that long for you to really start to have that kind of capability to comprehend.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, it’s like the philosophical, the spiritual development, all of those things start after maturing.

 

We’ll come back after the break, Grace Eki, and you can discuss some of the factors that are stalling those processes. So please stick around and we’ll be back after the break.

 

[29:41]

[ad]

[36:00]

[music]

[36:58]

 

Monika Schaefer: All right, welcome back. That music is so beautiful! And it just makes me think of what you just told me about before World War Two, anyway, that it would have been commonplace for families in Europe and Germany to be playing chamber music together after supper, after dinner.

 

And can you imagine the enrichment that provided in their lives as opposed to being stuck in front of a screen.

 

But anyway, before we go on with our discussion, I’m just going to remind the listener, if you have the means, please, please do support the Republic broadcast broadcasting network.

 

And if you go to the website, there will be all the information there. There’s still the special on T-shirt that’s still going on right through September. A special T-shirt? I would say if you do, I think it’s a $100 donation.

 

And if you don’t have the means, there are other ways you can help this network, and that is by sharing these programs. And you can do that anyway, even if you are supporting financially or support the sponsors. Yeah. So this is not mainstream. We have such a we’re very fortunate to have the Republic Broadcasting Network so that we can speak freely and speak truth.

 

Okay. So we were going to get onto these three stages of development and this third stage, which is critically important, but it’s less visible to the eye because the physical growth has happened. And the learning, a lot of the learning is in school, like, you were talking about the grammar and this, that.

 

But this other thing that happens, it’s like philosophical spiritual development that comes in that third stage, does it not? And we had talked about, what are some of the things that could arrest that development? This is the critical part. Go ahead.

 

Grace: Well, like, I’ll put it bluntly. Sexualization! Over sexualization at a young age.

 

Now, the West is theoretically at least a Christian country.

 

And I think it’s somewhere in the Bible or the New Testament. Doesn’t it say something like:

 

“Children should not see wicked things.”

 

Or do you know?

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, no, I’m not familiar with, did you say a Bible verse?

 

Grace: But, anyway, innocence should be protected and childhood should be protected. It’s like you don’t offer a cigarette to a six year old.

 

Monika Schaefer: Right? No! And what are we seeing in the schools? I mean, this is a subject that we talk about often. I’ve talked about it before, the hyper sexualization, and it is shocking what is going on in the schools. And this is a direct attack on us, on our people, on our children. And my goodness, it’s beyond even just exposure. It’s like downright, you know, poisoning of the minds. And then even physical like:

 

“Oh, yeah, you don’t feel like a girl today. You want to take these hormone puberty blocking things and, oh, well, oh, well, just. Sure, we can cut off that penis!”

 

I mean, it is just over the top, outrageously bad what is going on! And I mean, it already, it started a while back, but now it’s just accelerated to beyond belief! And, you know what you say:

 

“Okay, there’s hypersexual or over sexualization of children at too young, of age.”

 

This arrests, arrests their emotional development.

 

Grace: And many other things. And it’s like, I think this was the metaphor I gave to you. It’s like you cannot force open a flower to blossom while it’s in the bud. You would damage it forever! You have to have patience, and it has to grow. Everyone, basically, personally, you have to discover so-called sex or sexuality in some ways on your own, because the internal makings of a human being is far more complicated. And you have to let it blossom in quotation Mark “naturally”, because we have been so cut off from nature. So everyone has to kind of figure it out by refining their instinct.

 

But it’s just like children can mimic words to appear sophisticated, but to have had the experience to back it up.

 

And frankly, there was a Japanese writer that said he feels sorry for the younger generation of Japanese because in Japanese there is a word for “love”, and there is another word specifically for “falling in love”. And he said that children have no time, basically, to discover that mysterious emotion of falling in love, for example.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes.

 

Grace: And the other thing is you know why I think the other thing is, in childhood you must play a lot!

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes.

 

Grace: It’s very important. Well, one of the things, and also you can’t, I think, the way they keep the children so occupied. So yeah. Because sometimes you must have a lot of breathing space and you must sometimes even be bored for you to become creative. I wonder if that’s an oxymoron.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, you’re absolutely right! I’ll just tell you, the German word for “boredom” is “Langeweile”, which literally means “long while”.

 

So it’s a completely different meaning on that. And I love that.

 

But, you know what? We have a couple of callers on the line.

 

Kathleen: Yes.

 

Monika Schaefer: And let’s take Kathleen from Texas.

 

Hello, Kathleen, are you there?

 

Kathleen: Hey, Monika and Grace. A great show. And I called because I heard an author interviewed about ten years ago, maybe on RBN, and he wrote a book called the “440 Conspiracy”. And it was all about. I heard him interviewed several times. It was very interesting. And he had said many of the things you’re talking about, but he was talking about that 432 was actually what everybody played before the Rockefeller changed it to all the marching bands of the horns were all made with the 440. And it was unnerving, and it was very good to get people nervous and upset about going to war or something.

 

Monika Schaefer: Well, is that something? So that sounds like a good book. Grace Eki, are you familiar with that book?

 

Grace: No, I don’t know that book. So thank you.

 

Monika Schaefer: Who was the author, please?

 

Kathleen: I don’t know that. I don’t remember the author’s name, but it was called, The 440 Conspiracy.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay, I’m gonna write that down and I’m gonna look that up. That’s great!

 

Kathleen: It was about ten years ago, so.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay, thank you. Do you have any additional comments?

 

Kathleen: No, I love your show. I mean, I heard you for a long time before you had the show. And you just been great. So I’ve enjoyed every one. And thank you so much!

 

Monika Schaefer: Thank you so much, Kathleen, for your call.

 

[45:22]

 

Kathleen: Yes. Oh, I loved it when you said that you’re an ice skater in the wild. [chuckling]

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. [chuckling]

 

Kathleen: Wild skating. Oh, that’s so great.

 

And then all of your music, it’s wonderful! And, Grace, I really appreciated everything that you said, too.

 

Grace: Okay. So thank you so much!

 

Monika Schaefer: Well, thank you for your call. Okay. So, Mr producer, could we please have Nightingale on line three? Are you there?

 

Nightingale: Yes. Monika, can you hear me?

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes, we can. Thank you. Would you like to add a comment or question?

 

Nightingale: Thank you so much! I’m overjoyed to meet you. I want to say it’s an honor to meet such a brave, talented, honorable lady. Thank you so much! Just a fact that you play the music for your bumper music. I said, wow, RBM is getting classy. Fun! [chuckling] It was so beautiful! What a change. Usually I shut the bumpers off. Some of the host I listen to, I run to the phone and say:

 

“I don’t want to hear that!”

 

And I wait till the ads and the music are gone. [chuckling]

 

But with you, …

 

Monika Schaefer: That’s sweet of you. Thank you. Did you have any questions or comments for your guest, Grace Eki?

 

Nightingale: Yes, yes, I’m getting there. This has been fascinating! I just turned it on. Sometimes I listen live, sometimes it doesn’t work for me. I’m always on the cell phone, but sometimes it does a bit, and I turn it on just when your wonderful guest, her name is Grace. She’s been very, very personal to me. What I heard, very fascinating! She talked about a beautiful., … It was a beautiful anecdote. She thinks it’s from Mozart. That “music is painted on the canvas of silence”.

 

And I wanted to add that that is so beautiful, because it’s not just music, but it’s, I think, pretty much everything. Mystic experiences, the feeling of sacred is also. Everybody talks about it. All the mystics are on the, come out of silence. Even our myths of creation come out of silence. Things were “created by the word”, Elvero Incarnado, which is Spanish. What is it, the word incarnate? I don’t know if that’s that. But yeah, but it’s sound. Started creating the manifest world, I guess.

 

So this is very, very beautiful. And I heard many beautiful things. I heard the comment about spirituality, Rudolf Steiner ideas, spirituality developed later on.

 

But I have to say that I have to disagree with that a bit because I had, personally, some very mystical experiences. A very, very young child. And they did start going away. I totally agree with the over sexualization, because I think that’s when they started going away for me. Sex was just very much in my face with the world I lived in, my parents, and a lot of violence and jealousy! [chuckling] And it was always sad for me as a very young child.

 

But then when I hit puberty, I was very, very curious, and I did naughty things. You know, I wanted to see what this wonderful thing was. Right? And I learned that it wasn’t what it was touted to be. If love is not involved, if the falling in love, like you mentioned, but it can be a lot of fun. But it’s not falling in love. That’s a totally different thing.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah.

 

Nightingale: This has been very personal, what you were speaking of, because, yes, I had a, as a very young person before I was into sex, you might say, I had even incredible out of body experience, which I will always cherish. I hope that just before I die, I get there again, because it was like total unity.

 

I don’t know if you guys ever felt that, but the only experience I’ve ever had that I reserved the word “bliss” for. And it was just, it was just fascinating because I was totally not there. But you’re in everything when you exist, I guess, what people call a cosmic consciousness. And it was this overwhelming, powerful light that was so incredibly beautiful.

 

But then I was, it was going to annihilate me, which is a very mystery because I was not there, and yet I felt totally annihilation. And somewhere, I guess I was very young, somewhere in the body, I guess I wasn’t ready to go. And I was at the moment, so I realized that fear the root of all our issues, because it was fear that brought me back into the body. And then I felt so horrible to be back in the cave, and I just hated myself for being a coward! But someday maybe it’ll come back and I’ll be ready too.

 

Monika Schaefer: That’s an incredibly profound experience. Thank you for sharing that, Grace Aki, do you have any comments about it?

 

Nightingale: Well, it has a lot. Yes. It relates to everything you’re speaking of and I think I was lucky enough, even though I did have a very turmoil, not very happy household growing up. And yet my father did play classical music, and so I was imprinted with that. And it was the old vinyls, I must say! [chuckling]

 

And I think that is what, …

 

Monika Schaefer: Sorry, go ahead. Grace, did you want to comment on that.

 

Grace: Yes. That I wanted to say. I agree with her. You know, silence is the base of everything. And she was saying the Bible, I think. No, sorry the Testament in the beginning was the word, and word was “God”, but the word is “vibration with intent”. And I do kind of agree and with silence will show how important this intent and so-called vibration is, even more in the future.

 

And as speaking, I just wanted to make a comment as far as the frequency is concerned. You know those famous water crystals?

 

[51:52]

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes.

 

Grace: Photographed. Well, if it’s the ones I have seen anyway, at A 432, it actually makes a flower. At A 4040, it makes the outline. It’s different.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yes. And it scrambles it, doesn’t it? That’s what I’ve seen and heard.

 

Grace: Oh, it’s not as beautiful as 432. 432 definitely looks like a flower.

 

Monika Schaefer: Isn’t that something?

 

Grace: Yeah. Interesting!

 

Monika Schaefer: So, Nightingale, did you want to make a quick final comment? And then we’ll let you go, and I really appreciate that you called in and shared a your story with us. Yes, Nightingale.

 

Grace: Oh, perhaps she’s already gone.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay, so let’s have John in New Hampshire, please. Are you there? Okay, yeah, that’s great! You see, this is such an interesting subject. I find it just fascinating! And the vibrations, the music, and then, of course, this. Go ahead.

 

John: Hello? Am I on?

 

Monika Schaefer: You are on. Is this John?

 

John: Right, right. Okay. Thanks a lot, ladies. That Grace perked me up because when she mentioned Verdi, I was born in the same province as Giuseppe Verdi, Parma. I was very, very happy to hear that. And I’m wondering maybe, hopefully, maybe I can get in touch with her. And I got some interesting stuff.

 

So maybe somehow we can get connected through you, Monika, or through the board. I don’t mean to be rude, but I also would like to see if I could get in touch with Kathleen from Texas. I’ve been trying to get in touch with her, too. So maybe through the board op or something. But if you could call back in, or I could leave my number or something like that.

 

But anyway, yeah, this is a very fascinating conversation. And that, Grace, you’re a pretty amazing, remarkable woman!

 

And, I mean, I love my Italian heritage and I love, … I was born in Parma, but I was only 14 months when I came to this country. But most of my relatives still live in Italy. So maybe we can get in touch or something like that. But anyway. Okay, see what you can do.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay, I’ll just tell you how you can get in touch with me. My email address is posted on RBN. If you go to the host the page where they have my brief bio and that kind of thing. There is a, an email address posted there. Okay. So you could get in touch with me and then I could send your, I’ll get you connected with Grace.

 

John: Okay, I appreciate that. Do you think that would be a good way to get in touch with Kathleen from Texas?

 

Monika Schaefer: I have no idea. You’ll have to perhaps take that up with the producer. [chuckling]

 

John: Okay, great!

 

Monika Schaefer: So, yeah, and if you have a brief comment, final comment, because we have a couple of more callers on the line.

 

John: No, no, no, I’ll go, I’ll defer to them.

 

Monika Schaefer: So if that was John, thank you so much for your call. We have John from California.

 

Another John, are you there?

 

John: Yeah. So 528. I don’t know what, you know, about it. Good frequency or bad frequency?

 

Monika Schaefer: I don’t know. That’s a good question. Grace Eki, do you know, this 528?

 

Grace: I think it’s like you. Continue. I think it’s just a, C higher.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah, I don’t know. I think I’ve heard things about it that are actually kind of terrifying about it, but I don’t know. I’m not sure. [chuckling] What do you know, about it, John?

 

John: Yes, well, I don’t know a lot about it. I know that it’s titled. There’s a guest, I won’t use names that comes on this RBN that claims it to be a love frequency. But I’ve heard from others that it’s a not so much.

 

Monika Schaefer: Yeah. This is something we’re gonna have to do some more research on. Maybe the next caller will know. [chuckling]

 

Grace: But let me add that everything has a plus and a minus, the yin and the yang. So something that’s positive in one sense is possible, that it’s very, quite negative in another sense. But I’ve heard of this number. I think it was just, 2056 that you keep on going higher up. But I could be wrong.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay. John, did you have anything like to add?

 

John: Well, yeah, I don’t know a lot about it. Supposedly it’s called Esophageal [sp]. I don’t know if I pronounced it correctly, which was something that was kind of in Rome, they had this thing kind of under wraps for a long time. And supposedly someone got a hold of this following. It’s supposed to come from the Bible and, …

 

Anyway, I just wondered what you knew about it. But thank you very much. Great show.

 

Monika Schaefer: Okay. Thank you for your call. Let’s take Chris from Alabama. And we really literally have just, 20 seconds left or so. chris, are you there?

 

Chris: Yeah. Hi, Monika. Sometimes when I have more time. I’m Chris from Alabama. I moved here from California along. I live in California. Born there in 57, married a Canadian woman in 88, and she’s lived in the United States for all this time. We’ve been to Canada many times. British Columbia.

 

Monika Schaefer: Did you have something for our guests?

 

Chris: That book is called The 440 Enigma, and it’s basically trying to blame the 440 frequency on a collaboration between the Rockefellers and the Nazis. And it has a swastika on the cover of it. And like everything else, they want to blame everything on the Nazis! I’m just adding that right now.

 

Monika Schaefer: Ha! Thanks for that. It does sound like we know that they’re lying to us about who are the “Nazis”, quote, unquote, and what they did and all that stuff. So that’s a little bit suspect, isn’t it? And the producer did write in the notes. Maybe it’s The 440 Enigma by LC Vincent.

 

Grace. Do you have a final comment? Just while the music is taking us out?

 

Chris: It’s a pleasure listening to you.

 

Grace: Yes. I wanted to say that, remember that your voice is the free gift of so-called God and nature, an instrument you already have inside and so is your body. And I think it’s in our DNA to love, to dance and sing, and it should help one when one that’s not really so happy. Thank you.

 

Monika Schaefer: Beautiful! Thank you for being my guest, and thank you to all the callers. Thank you very much.

 

Monika Schaefer: And thank you to the producer, too. Awesome job!

 

Grace: Thank you.

 

Monika Schaefer: Keeping everybody straight. Okay, bye bye.

 

[59:01]

[music]

[59:05]

[ad]

[59:59]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

RBN Comments

top

(Comments as of 8/25/2024 = 0)

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 1 – Intro – Jun 29, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 2 – Jul 6, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 03 with Paul Fromm – Jul 13, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 08 with Alfred Schaefer – Aug 17, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 15 with Jürgen Neumann on Ernst Zündel – Oct 12, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

 

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/3/2024 = 94)

 

@baldbull
4 days ago
I never liked him. Him and the Tate brothers should be loaded onto a rocket and fired off towards the sun. Bye!

43
0
Hide replies
wytisryt441
4 days ago
Completely agree

16
0
Nationalist Geographic (Mini-Hyph)
4 days ago
strap me to Syrian Girl and fire me at Tel Aviv.

7
1

@Mcavoy
4 days ago
His account name was always a bit of a clue!

30
0
Hide replies

@dsallen7
4 days ago
Jews are literally a Bronze Age tribe of hate-filled religious fanatics. And they’re also quite perverted.

20
0
Show 2 replies
Nationalist Geographic (Mini-Hyph)
4 days ago
Just got my Talmud signed by BAP.

10
0
ThinRedLine
2 days ago
agreed

3
0
Love of our People
4 days ago
Zog Age Jewvert

28
0
Euroicism
4 days ago
Bap?.. more like bagel.

28
0
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
BArmitzpha Prick

3
0

@UncleVaughn
4 days ago
More importantly, what did BAP do for Hanukkah?

26
0
Florida Man
4 days ago
Imagine having Pervert in your username…on purpose

25
0
Wibble
4 days ago
I had never heard of him….
I wish that was still the case…

21
1
Hide replies

@ironborn
4 days ago
that’s not a qualifier, you dumb fck. People who matter literally cite his shitty book, so it’s important to expose the types that are influencing western white elites, like the jewed up Thiel Network BAP is a part of.

2
9
Hide replies
Wibble
4 days ago
Are you a bot?
You appear to be just typing random words…..

12
1
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
No they have aspergers. I know these types, the crusader types. They’re insufferable and have nothing else going for them in life so they try to police other people within their online sphere. It is what it is, just ignore them, its hard but try.

5
0

@EndJewishPrivilege
4 days ago(edited)
Jews are so subversive. It is entrenched in their DNA. Feminism and MGTOW both serve to lower the White (European) Birthrate, and it comes as no surprise that jews heavily feature in both of these anti-family ‘movements’.

20
2
Hide replies
Love of our People
4 days ago
We Aryans can’t even begin to grasp the perversity of the Jewish mind. They literally work tirelessly to tear down goodness and beauty. I am often amazed at how I came to understand that Hitler far from being the devil I’d believed him to be as a child was actually a champion of the good who went down against all the world’s forces of evil.

14
0
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
keep in mind jews would never have the power and influence they do if it wasnt for the muscle they have; the labour and intellect of whites who, some wittingly and unwittingly, aid jewish causes.

3
0
Æthelwulf of norð hẏmbra land
2 days ago
It’s not a birthrate problem, its a degeneracy problem. You’re all degenerate and could do much better and you know it.

0
3
Hide replies

@EndJewishPrivilege
2 days ago
Me, personally? No, I’m not degenerate- I am and always have been a Relationship Man and Family Man……finding a beautiful woman with pro-White and pro-family values, to fall in love with, have children with and get married to.
I have never believed in sleeping around with random women for the sake of notches on the bedpost; i.e. ‘pump and dump’.
I hardly ever watch p**n (which is promoted by jews).
It is jewry who promote degeneracy…..it is up to the White (European) gentiles to get clued-up to the jews and reject the degeneracy they promote.

1
0
Hide replies
Æthelwulf of norð hẏmbra land
2 days ago
None of this external shit matters right now because the vast ma of everybody is only invested in their personal lives; so that’s all WE can do. The complaint metapolitics is really starting to taper off from it’s peak.

@Quartz14
4 days ago
I learned BAP was Jwish some years ago after reading his book and subscribing to his podcast for several months. Upon learning this I was devastated and cancelled my subscription to gumroad, however about a week later I was victim of a credit card scam involving that very same card, the only person who had those details was me and gumroad (ie BAP), I did this at his recommendation for op-security reasons (ie anonymity). That jw tried to scam me for cancelling the sub, in the end the bank took the hit so it was the happy outcome of jws scamming jws.

18
0
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
i learned he was jewish after october 7th. Mask off.

8
0

@voidincog
4 days ago
every.single.time.

17
0
Earthling Carl
4 days ago
Another subversive Jew…

15
0

@popovacianen
4 days ago
i mean BAP is a jew what did you expect lol

15
0
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
Tate isnt a jew but its the same thing. He’s a mutt, preaching the same message…HANDLED by a jew.

6
0
Nationalist Geographic (Mini-Hyph)
4 days ago
Kept seeing his stuff leak into our circles along with his gay lover raw egg Zionist and got shit for calling it years ago.

1
0
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
Well, because your take is likely wrong. To be honest, the only take nationalists really are razor sharp on, is race. Everything else is just wishful thinking/virgin larp think. Mgtow and manosphere shit arent the same thing yet here I am again seeing the dissident right lump both of them together as the same thing when they’re not.
Mansophere pervs and sex pests like bronze age jew preach pump and dumb shit which is antithesis to what mgtow people do, which is anything not having to do with women, they’ve checked out, they’re not interested in making arguments to defend their existence, they’re out for themselves only, they’re done and for whatever reason that is, whether its being burned bad, whatever…the reason is irrelevant.
The POINT is mgtow or people who do that stuff are not a threat, they’re not allied with anyone, not organized, they do whatever it is they do and are not in the mansophere shit, they hate that shit too, the reason BAP got doxxed is BECAUSE of guys like that, calling him out and destroying his grift, which most of the manosphere is. Nationalists lumping two subgroups together when their ideals are conflicting is low iq retarded hyper online think.
The manosphere shit, the tate and bap shit is what needs kicking down, lumping in guys who got the short end of the stick and just decided to check out instead of going on killing spree or a pump and dump with women, is disingenuous and retarded.
People who decide not to have kids will never be convinced or goaded into doing it, shoving it in their face as a taunt wont work and never has. Attack the manosphere shit which encourages treating women like sex toys and backstabbing other men over poosie, both of which the mgtow camp viscerally hate.
Less

2
0

@Gundobar
4 days ago
Every.Single.Time

12
0
Matt Hammond
4 days ago
I have 2 kids and one on the way and I don’t miss those awful drunk nights out at all.

13
0

@dsallen7
4 days ago
The Ancient Greeks, whom BAP claims to emulate and idolize, looked down on sexual promiscuity and all sexual relations not strictly within marriage and for procreation, as being unmanly.

10
1
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
thats not true. thats just you projecting your slave morality, jewish brain rot abrahamic belief system unto non abrahamic culture which glorified and damn near worshipped the human physique.
Men saw sex as a rite of passage, hard to believe (for u im sure) but it resonates with every normal man on an instinctive level, they just wont admit it outright for fear of social ridicule in this day and age. Roman patricians would get their younger male, 2nd and third inline, to lose their virginity when they became of age either through marriage and/or other means, ie escort or otherwise. Im not glorifying or criticizing those times, I’m stating whats factual. The sooner boys got their curiosity of women out of the way the sooner and better they were able to get on with their actual work/purpose in life.
Men saw sex as right of passage, women saw sex as a means to gain access to resources. So male sexual appetite was encouraged while female sexual appetite was tempered. Do u get it?

1
9
Hide replies

@Thomas
3 days ago
Found the jew

0
1
Hide replies

@What3
2 days ago
found the schizo

@MaybeNextTime
4 days ago
Another lying homosexual jew parasiting off White Civilization.

8
0

@Carlota
4 days ago
It’s not a crime to be out of shape, but it’s ridiculous to brag about being a bodybuilder when in actuality you’re a skinny-fat ghey tribe member.

8
0

@FocusFire
4 days ago
BAP was the most obvious astroturf op I’ve ever seen. Massive respect lost to any of our guys who didn’t immediately see through it. You didn’t even need to know he was a tribe member to know this.

6
0

@chipsnsalsa99
4 days ago
Of course it’s another Jew trying to co-opt a healthy movement. Some things never change.

5
1

@vengeance
4 days ago
Next youre gonna tell me that Hyper-Borean heeb is jewish!!!

5
0
Graham Playing Games
4 days ago
People that pay for sex are scum. Why would you PAY someone? Why wouldn’t you want someone to WANT to be with you just as you want to be with them? You are lesser than someone you are paying because they are desirable and you aren’t – hence paying for them to be with you. Paying for someone to be with you and bragging about it is such a self-own.

3
1
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
imagine idealizing a prostitute above the person paying for them, its akin to treating a pedophile selling cp lighter than the pedophile who bought it from them. You just did it, mark collet did it.
The absolute state of the dissident right. If this is what jews are up against, the only thing that will be the undoing of jews, is their own behavior, not the reaction or pushback from any outside group. October 7th proved this. The dissident right are impotent for the most part, spectators.

1
1
Hide replies
Graham Playing Games
3 days ago(edited)
It’s that the people paying have to pay the person that is desirable. If the person paying was desired, they wouldn’t be paying. Who has the power in that situation? Who is on top, actually?
You shouldn’t pay someone – you should be desired just as you desire the other person. Boys shouldn’t be told they are so worthless and not wanted that they have to pay someone for affection. Women like men, too. Boys should be taught to be the best they can and that they also are desired.

1
0
Hide replies

@What3
2 days ago
Wow, you’re still trying to do mental gymnastics about it :/

Hide replies
Graham Playing Games
2 days ago
It’s not mental gymnastics. If anyone is doing that, it’s you. The person paying is not desired, the person being paid is desired. But you shouldn’t be in that situation, anyway. You should be in a mutual relationship where both parties are desired sexually.

Hide replies

@What3
2 days ago
It is. The seller and the buyer are scum. You’re joining in in the delusion that one is higher on the pecking order than the other. They’re both scum, just like the person selling child pawn to the person buying it, both scum. I dont want to hear anymore of this nonsense. You people are crazy and dont even know it.

Mr.AG
3 days ago
So basically he is a wanna be andrew tate…

3
0
Nationalist Geographic (Mini-Hyph)
4 days ago
Fitness is good but I always thought that Bap affiliates fixating on looks was pretty gay. Most women will pick a Tony Soprano over a Roided out influencer dork with a Twitter inflated ego.

3
0
Hide replies

@Mcavoy
4 days ago
Tony was just a guy who loved his family!

1
0
Nationalist Geographic (Mini-Hyph)
4 days ago(edited)
I’ve yet to see somebody from the BAP-sphere who hasn’t been exposed as a homosexual, non-white, Jewish, a mischling or a non-white homosexual mischling.

3
0

@Mcavoy
4 days ago(edited)
The revolutionary spirit of Jewish ideology has always been the enemy of our civilisation. However, I think it is a bit sad that Mark talks about Christmas only in terms of gift giving and family gatherings.
Our ancestors celebrated the solstice, as a moment when every day that followed arrived with more daylight. For primitive agricultural communities, this was a sign of hope.
But that aboriginal faith system was superseded by a more sophisticated metaphysical interpretation of our relationship with creation. Nobody really knows when Jesus was born but the early Christians began to celebrate the astrophysical equinox, by exulting a moment when God became man.
As extraordinary as this sounds, it founded our civilisation and the beginning of an identity that went far beyond tribal loyalty. We were in fact, the design of a single creator and unlike the rest of nature, had been provided with a conscience to question, explore and understand our purpose in the universe.
That is what Christmas is about and the simple pleasure of eating, gifting and having fun are primarily meant to enable children to enjoy the event. The Jews hate Christmas, because it signalled the end of what they considered to be a special relationship with God. For 2000 years they have plotted their revenge on our civilisation and BAP is just another representation of their malevolence. The best and only way to defeat the Jews, is to return to the shield of Christian faith that protected us from their hatred for centuries.
Our society is filled with troubles and in presentation, lacks any sort of spiritual consolation. The times I spend in Church, on my own or with a congregation, are some of the few moments during a week I feel true peace. Fuentes has joked that the Jews can’t follow you there, as they’d burst into flames as they cross the threshold!
Try to visit your local church sometime, just to see if you are calmer when you leave than when you arrived. It’s a harmless experiment!
Less

5
3
Hide replies

@Quartz14
4 days ago
Yes very good. The solstice is actually something that can be seen with your eyes, the process I mean, it is not a metaphysical event its an ACTUAL event. The Sun reaches its lowest point in the sky on the 22nd December and remains there for 3 days. At night at this part of the sky is the southern cross constellation. After 3 days the Sun rises again 1 degree and is “reborn”. Hence the Sun dies on the cross and is resurrected. Jesus was not a real man, he is a character or vehicle by which to tell the story in a way that is understood by the profane, much like Horus or Hermes Trismegstus etc. The spring equinox also is the point at which the day becomes longer than night, it is the point in the year where the Sun defeats the darkness (Seth, Saturn/Satan), the light defeats the dark. That is why it is celebrated, though obviously in a confused way. In Christianity the Suns rebirth is celebrated in Winter Solstice, which is actually when the Sun is reborn (25th December), but its death and resurrection is celebrated in the spring when light defeats darkness. Obviously 99.9% of Christians have no idea.
Christianity is a pagan religion, there is more to it than even that but I will leave it there. I enjoyed your comment and much of it is spot on.
Less

1
4
Hide replies

@Mcavoy
4 days ago
Many people, mostly Jews, have been trying to deconstruct Christianity since Jesus died on the cross. He did have a physical existence and this is recorded in historical accounts. The horrible martyrdom of many of his closest followers, is also a matter of historical fact and in all of recorded human experience, their attestments represent an extraordinary self-sacrifice. What ever happened that caused them to give their lives so willingly, could only have resulted from a series of exceptional charismatic events.
Unlike aboriginal (pagan) faith systems based on observable phenomena, Christianity is almost entirely metaphysical. This requires a far more sophisticated intellectual curiosity to arrive at logical conclusions. The Greeks tried to rationalise the process but failed, because they could not explain why a supernatural force should have any interest in the minds of individuals, us.
The bridge between Greek logic and God’s communication with the Hebrew people, is the Koine term Logos. This does not translate well into English but can mean “words”, which by their nature, are metaphysical tools to explain substance. The best example of this is Saint John’s prologue to his gospel, 1:1.
If you understand any of that, you are on the same journey as me. I’m a nationalist because in principle, nationalism respects the natural order of the universe. The Jews and their social engineering project, to mush the people of the world into one servile class of passive consumers beneath them, is the reason why they cause chaos. But above everything, we must follow the moral law and that is defined by acceptance of a higher authority, both outside of us and more importantly, inside us.
Btw, I don’t know what you mean by referring to the Southern Cross. This is not visible in the Northern hemisphere where Christianity was founded, so the ancient astrologers were unaware of its existence. Maybe you need to improve your understanding of astronomy, as well as theology.
Less

Hide replies

@Quartz14
4 days ago
Fine I will go further for your benefit.
Rome was a pagan civilisation, its people worshiped the pantheon, specifically Jupiter at the head, Saturn, Mercury, Venus, Mars – these were the Gods. Astrology was a large part of this belief, and was inhereited from Greece, who inherited from the Egyptians and Babylonians. Jupiter in astrology is the God of expansion, understanding and forgiveness, he was the head of the Roman religion. He is mighty in battle and his symbol is the eagle – the holy symbol carried by the roman legions and famously defended and revered with religious zeal. As governor of expansion, Jupiter is responsible for the fermentation of wine and the rising of bread (fermentation). He is ruler of the zodiac sign Pisces in which age we have lived since the year 0AD. The term for the planetary ruler of a sign is “anointed” or “Messiah”. Pisces is the twin fish, the fish being an early christian symbol of course. It is said in the bible the Jesus feeds the 5000 with bread (Jupiter) and 2 fish (Pisces). It is said that Jesus turns water into wine (fermentation). It is said that the disciples of Jesus were all “Fishermen”, and the men of the old testament, written in the age of Aries (The Ram) were called “Shepherds”. This is a coincidence I am sure.
Do I need to put this together for you?
You are correct regarding the southern cross not being visible today in the northern hemisphere, yet it is true. I have seen the winter solstice twice within 12 months having spent half in the north and half in the south of this world, I missed summer that year but I learned a great deal about the nature of reality, and of religious history. Christianity is not the only monotheistic cult worshipping a single God of the pantheon, Jews worship Saturn, Muslims worship Venus, Buddhists (a cult of pagan Hinduism) worship Mercury, the word for the planet Mercury in sanskrit is “Budha”. I will leave you to your delusions.
Less

Hide replies

@Mcavoy
2 days ago(edited)
At least you gave up trying to claim that Jesus did not exist and now accept the historical records about him and the apostles, this is progress. You also agree that the Southern Cross can never be observed in the Northern hemisphere above the 25th parallel, so we are off to the races!
I strongly suspect you have never encountered the concept of logos before. This is not surprising as I attended Catholic schools for twelve years and it was never mentioned but it is the key to understanding why Christianity became the basis of our civilisation. The Greek philosophers struggled with the concept of existence and the failure to resolve the internal contradictions of their mythology was catastrophic for their spiritual survival. The Romans failed in the same way. Nobody now believes in their religion.
The Hebrew people understood that a single God spoke directly to them. It was a physical revelation and the world could never be the same again. That relationship resulted in the Ten Commandments, which to this day, instruct us on the moral law of our creator. Whether you think it is delusional or not, in your heart you know the difference between living in harmony with God’s nature and the consequences of transgression.
Our civilisation was built on the foundational principles of Christianity, the contribution of the Pagans was to lay out the roads and they all lead to Rome. As our society becomes more deracinated, it loses its purpose. If there is no God, then people imagine they can do as they please, which seems to be your philosophy. The Europeans have lost their way before but there will be a spiritual revival, as people dissent against the idea that science can explain everything. When more realise how much the scientists conspired with the ruling class to impose the Covid hoax against us, there will be a true reckoning.
Dr Jones explains Logos below. This is what helped me to find a better way. Maybe you, too.
odysee.com/god-allows-evil-to-bring-about-good:4
Less

Hide replies

@Quartz14
2 days ago
Now you are putting words into my mouth. Jesus did not exist. History is a series of lies agreed upon, there are no credible records of Jesus Christ, just as 8 nations claim to be the birth place of Hermes Trismegestus – there was no Hermes. The stories about both of these charecters use them as a vehicle to pass on a message – it is allegory. Water to wine. Bread and fish. Healing the sick with miracles (Hermes did this first). Death and resurrection after 3 days (winter solstice – Horus and Dionysus achieved this miracle long before Jesus). Even his birth is called “the Nativity” which is the astrological term for “position of the stars at birth”.
You are telling me you were brainwashed at Catholic school. Logos yes, I understand you are a person of the mind – I am a practical astronomer and astrologer and see the world with my eyes not my thought (Thoth). At least neither of us are a “person of the book” like the Jews and the Protestants who believe God wrote the bible and take everything in this life “literally”. They are people of the mind also, and it is evident since Eienstein and the jewish take over of science for their own ends that progress in the philosophy of creation has stagnated. We have advanced no where in our understanding in over 100 years thanks to their lies. They have Quantum recipes that work and can create high technology, yet there is ZERO understanding of why, and they admit this themselves. They make up new nonsense about dark matter, string theories and black holes that no one has ever seen (ie they do not exist), instead of looking to the world for answers. God is everywhere, you just need to see. Yet you prefer logos to practical observation of God through his creation. When I look through my telescope I am seeing aspects of the creator. When I engage in conversation with you, I am speaking directly to a facet of God. The planets are facets of him, but not Gods themselves, just as we are facets of creation, but not the creator.
Less

Hide replies

@Mcavoy
1 day ago
It is very hard to take somebody seriously, when they reject the evidence of objective reality. Almost every significant academic scholar of antiquity, whether pro or anti Christianity, accepts that Jesus of Nazareth existed. You would be on slightly firmer ground, if you contested what happened during his life. Total rejection that he lived and no doubt, the attestments of the apostles, places you in a fractional minority of belligerent Christophobes. Even Dawkins and the Jews accept that Jesus existed!
Yes, I went to a Catholic school and left as a confirmed atheist, so the brainwashing did not work and my study of theology developed afterwards. My teachers never explained the natural symmetry of Logos and I doubt that you heard about the concept, before you commented on my post. I provided a link to a 15 minute explanation of the principles. You might be interested in the part where Dr Jones explains how Logos enables us to study astronomy, to understand our place God’s creation.
Claiming that God is everywhere and therefore unintelligible, is a cope used to ignore his clear instructions. The enemies of Logos promote that type of nihilistic propaganda, to deracinate people from the collective faith that created our civilisation. See the Book of Jeremiah
29:13
Less

Hide replies

@Quartz14
1 day ago
“Almost every significant academic scholar of antiquity…” – this is not evidence of objective reality, that is called an appeal to authority. There are many scholars who said Jesus never existed, both ancient and contemporary, you just think yours are better. Jesus obvious never lived, he is at best a Hermes Trismegstus figure who was likely several people (at best), but more likely due to how the ancients told their stories, he is a charecter to carry a message. The story is the medium through which allegory carries knowledge. Kane and Able were not real, they are story telling mechanism. Rumple stiltskin is not a real person, he is an allegory for the Jews. The Jews say Jesus exists because they want you to believe your lord and saviour was a Jew LOL. That is another bullshit lie, pushed by the jewish supremacists like Adam Green, and it benefits only the jews and israel. And you call yourself a Catholic!
Father – Son – Holy Ghost is a direct astrological reference – JUPITER (father) – SUN (Gods Sun) – MOON (spirit).
I am the light and the life. I am the light of the world. I will be with you always, until the ending of the age (of Pisces). All true, all allegory for the mechanisms of the creator. Let us make man in OUR image, plural.
I did not say God is everywhere, I said we are all FACETS of God, like looking at a single face of a gemstone, you see a part of the whole. Each planet is a facet – Mars is glory, anger, violence, wrath, honor. Venus is beauty, friendship, love, lust. Mercury is thought (THOTH in Egypt, Hermes in Greece), intellect, ideas. Jupiter is justice, growth, understanding, forgiveness. Saturn is restriction, limitation, boundaries and death. All men are made in the image of the planets – they each carry a facet of the planets, the Gods – but they are not Gods themselves. Just as the Gods are not the creator, though they each represent a facet of him. As above, so below. Psalm 82. Though Psalm 90 is my favorite. All the best.
Less

Hide replies

@Mcavoy
19 hours ago
You have previously demonstrated that you don’t understand how basic astronomy works. Now you have proved that you don’t understand how to use logical fallacies to support an argument. The appeal to authority fallacy is only valid, when the authority cited is unqualified to provide an expert opinion. For brevity, I did not see a requirement to name the academic sources who accept that Jesus was a historical figure, because the evidence is so overwhelming. It is embarrassing for you to dispute reality, whilst hiding behind the ridiculous crank fiction of astrology.
The reason why I wrote my original post was to point out a tragic omission in Mark’s video. I admire him but there is a spiritual void at the core of ethno-nationalism, which cannot be overlooked. He is trying to build PA as a nationalist community but the greatest community we ever had, still exists as the Christian church. Not unlike the rest of our society, it may be hollowed out and a shadow of its former glory but that’s because moral people chose to say nothing. “Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Who said that?
I’d like to see Mark and other leaders be as brave as Candace Owens and say out loud: “Christ is King!”. This would directly oppose Jewish corruption, heathens and cranks, by restoring Logos as the driving force to protect our civilisation, which it did successfully, for more than 1000 years.
Did you watch Dr Jones’ explanation of Logos? It is only 15 minutes long and helped me to understand the true nature of ultimate reality. Here it is, again.
odysee.com/god-allows-evil-to-bring-about-good:4
Less

Hide replies

@Quartz14
15 hours ago
Where did I demonstrate I don’t understand astrology? I said you can’t see the southern cross TODAY, ie it was once visible in the northern hemisphere as the Egyptians say it was, and today still the Sun hangs on the cross at 35 degrees latitude. You think because the bible story was written 2000 years ago there was no astronomy before that? There were no stars in the sky before 0AD? That the sky was always as it is now for thousands of years?
Jesus was born long before your bible was, he had many names, Horus, Dionysus, Apollo. I am wasting my time with you though I see, you are not a reasonable person. You attempt petty insults and appeal directly to your sources (appeal to authority) knowing full well there are others who disagree with you – or perhaps you don’t? Then at least you are just honest and stupid. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you are indeed stupid, and like most people you have nothing to offer but appealing to the work of others. Midwit is the term. Yes yes I have seen Jones work years ago, it is a joke. I am not wasting my time on him and his jew worship again.
Less

@Quartz14
1 day ago
Actually psalm 107 is also extremely good. Atb.

lambchops
3 days ago
Every. Single. Time.

2
0
Fancy
4 days ago
Shitty clip dick jewish genetics OY VEY!

2
0
Fancy
4 days ago(edited)
Dont know the guy thank fuk. Seems like a red pill all girls are sluts cash for sex jewish tate clone.That got hurt once probably as a teen and never got over it. All this shows is he is mentality weak. He needs to get over it or he will be a very lonely OAP.
And if that is his photo then ,fitness ,bodybuilding WTF

2
0
Winter Phoenix F K
7 hours ago
Mark, you SLEW him with that ending!

1
0
Witch Hunter Siegfried
4 days ago
Also, the “Bronze Age Mindset” shit I’d bet was ripped off Golden One’s “Demigod Mind” given it’s literally about wanting to be seen as a demigod, difference is Golden One is White lmao.

0
1
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
Nah, you’re stupid. Golden One doesnt preach pump and dumb sex pest nonsense. This isnt even apples and oranges you’re comparing, more like apples and something thats not even edible.

@What3
4 days ago

@MarkCollett
mgtow isnt a warped mirror image if feminism. They arent going their own way, they are sent their own way, weather its by women who bought the jewish narratives or other men(like u, no offense) clowning on them for w.e. reason, wether its a strawman of them ur putting out there or same pump and dump shit that jew pervert u said pushes.
Mgtow people dont rly want anything to do with women, ever. They just do their own shit and want to be left the hell alone, not lumped in together with people like bronze age pervert(manosphere fools). The reasons for this are ALL reasonable; wether its they got burned by women, by the deeds of other men they thought had their back over some woman or even maternal issues, growning up with one of the same feminist mothers you talked about.
Mgtow people arent out here or online preaching mgtow, holding conferences, having political organizations etc. They’re the guys who gave up on women, so they want nothing to do with them, which is ANTITHESIS to the pump and dump shit redpill manosphere pushes.
You, mark, and a lot of these dissident virgin spergs, are doing the same thing, jews have done to anyone who criticizes their behaviour; Lump them all together as hostile. Mgtow people hate manosophere redpill fools like bronze age pervert who are poosie fanatics. They just want to be left alone and not demonized, thats it, a simple ask. Theyr’e a non threat. Masophere shit is a threat, go after that and stop kicking horses who are down and out.
Less

2
5
Hide replies
Black Pilled Monkeh
4 days ago
Sure, Jan.

Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
why are u being such a cunt?

2
2
Hide replies
Black Pilled Monkeh
4 days ago
Because you’re laughably wrong and almost all your comments are ghae and retarded.

1
0
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
You spelled gay wrong, retard. And they’re not, the fact that no one wants to bother with a rebuttal other than one which contains bad spelling, fortifies my point.

0
1
Hide replies
Black Pilled Monkeh
4 days ago
I spelled gay “ghae” in the mocking online jargon way, you internet illiterate.
And I’m not fetching my encyclopedia of mgtow misfits for an internet crusader like you, because I realized MGTOW was a jewish cop-out years and years ago.
I understand that the type of man to be attracted to MGTOW are men who have been burned. I respect that. I empathize with the poor bastards who got divorce-raped by a heartless ex, their wife of many years abandoning the family, men falsely accused of rape, men who were raised by abusive mothers, and those who despair in the face of today’s abysmal dating prospects. I get it.
Yet the path to healing is fixing the bridge between the sexes, prioritizing the family, and taking down the jewish tyrants. Not mgtow.
MGTOW promotes abandoning women and relationships, and while there are indeed mgtow monks there are absolutely mgtow who promote pump and dump.
Not to mention the many, many nonwhite mgtow leaders who not only pump and dump, but who BRAG about cucking White men and grooming White women. (I forget his name, but one bearded Turk comes to mind, and that was way back in like 2014. And as far as I’m aware, Tate had mgtow fans).
I might have politely argued against your mgtow comment, if it weren’t for the fact that I’ve seen you under countless proWhite videos countersignalling/undermining our people.
Less

2
0
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
Internet illiterate? No, hyper online. Thats the phrase, dont flatter yourself.
Mgtow doesnt promote abandoning women, read my very first post, jan. They dont promote anything, they were SENT their own way. Its all in my first post which you admittedly mockingly replied to instead of addressing the points, which u did in this comment in half assed way by cherry picking points u think you can strawman.

0
1
Hide replies
Black Pilled Monkeh
4 days ago
Cherry picking? Strawman? Lol, okay man. Go your own way now.

1
0
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago(edited)
Thank you for fortifying my point and yes and I’ve seen you under countless pro white videos also, having bad takes and good, what’s your point schizo? That im hasbara? No, if i were jewish I’d do what jews have always been doing to the dissident right; ignoring them because we cant get our shit together. Simple as.
Also I can coutnersignal whatever the pppppppppppppppphuck i want and theres nothing u can do or say to stop me lol. If i ruffle feathers, so be it. Lets have an exchange, or just slime and move on but I’ll say what I say based on evidence that is not ANCEDOTAL but frequently occurring within any given subgroup. I dont cherry pick, which is what you seem to pride yourself on by lurking in mgtow mutt channels/groups who call themselves such and picking out the one bad apple to paint the whole group.
Every man that wants nothing to do with women, were sent their own way, its not a choice they made, it was made for them through circumstances beyond their control. What I noticed in the dissident right is that their problems are downplayed or dismissed unless it is one which can fortify nationalists points. Much like how the media ignores certain stories if its black on white crime and upsells stories if the races are swapped.
Less

0
1
Kestrel.Falcons
4 days ago
bunch of grifters all you.

3
18
Hide replies
TheCeltDenise
4 days ago
LOL Is that the best ya got?

11
2
Talmudvision Zogberg
4 days ago
An absolutely pointless video about another easily spotted subversive. What’s with all these online White nationalists disabling the the downvote? It’s weak and pro censorship.

6
21
Hide replies
TheCeltDenise
4 days ago
Report to the Oven, Schlomo

14
2
Hide replies

@What3
4 days ago
dumb bitch lol

3
2

@What3
4 days ago
Its not pointless tho but I see where you’re coming from. As if to say people(normal people) actually know who bronze age pervert is, tate sure but not this jew, tate is also handled by a jew btw but tate is way more famous because he has money and social capital so i see dissidents going after him as making sense.
This pervert fella who literally had a meltdown after october 7th after pushing war bride doctrine shit for so long was the final nail in the coffin, all of his doing, no need for anyone to point that loser out, hes irrelevant and clowning on him will just give him a victim status/narrative to push, which jews love to revel in, their whole religion and that of the other abrahamic ones rely on this for self worth.

1
1
Kermie
4 days ago
100% agree on the downvote thing. Just because a few faggots downvote every post is not a reason to eliminate their opportunity… more a vehicle to expose them.
100% disagree on the validity of this video’s purpose. Today I can spot a subversive from a mile away. 10-15 years ago, I could not spot that same person. This video is for the person in that position.

3
1
HydraulicHydra
1 day ago
Satan is calling for him.

HydraulicHydra
1 day ago
A lot of the MGTOW crowd have a similar argument: “Live life for yourself and let your country, your race, and your relationship with God go to hell.” Yes, the modern dating and relationship scene is [a word that is apparently blocked lol] in the ass but the only way it, and life in general are going to get better is for good people to take a stand.

GusinLanzarote Alt Right
2 days ago
is this guy a creep- yes but WHO is more of a demographic threat a childless lonely jew hiring prossies on Xmas day OR a Black who impregnates numerous White females runs off then expects the state to raise themIts easy to have a go at Incels but WHY do they exist because feminism made every Average 7/10 female believe she has the Right to a perfect 9/10 handsome rich Alpha there were No incels in 1824. And yes Jews are over represented in feminism but so are Lesbians / LGBT mafia. So a far better strategy for nationalists would be to end feminism rather than worrying about how many jews were in itOf course the anonymous avatar boys will slime my comment to death – but whilst you obsess on childless lonely jews a population EXPLOSION in África will breed out your race Disraeli was a jew but Id prefer his Britain to today’s Anytime

Taciturn
3 days ago(edited)
I’ve always disliked Nietzscheans. Nietzsche was a faggot. If not literally, then spiritually.

Hide replies
GusinLanzarote Alt Right
1 day ago
Dont you feel a bit sorry for Nietzsche? going mad seeing that being flogged in Turin & spending years in a loony bin As we saw with legend Bowden those beqiethed the gift of Genius often get the burden of mental turmoil thrown in with it

Hide replies
Taciturn
1 day ago(edited)
I don’t think it’s the crazy though. Bowden was a gentleman and a scholar, whereas Nietzsche routinely makes me want to bully him for being a loser. This is just my grug brain reaction to him, though.

1
0
spqr
3 days ago
expel and ban them forever, take the countries back and seal it this time in the Constitution

Pure
3 days ago
Wasnt there an expose on raw egg nationalist too, or are they the same character or something ? I dont know but if its so that raw egg nationalist is same kind of scam like bap, they should be ashamed to put nationalist in their name and delete that from their name. Replacing raw egg nationalist with something like raw egg liar or raw egg egomaniac. That i would be ok with.

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

Mark Collett – Book Review – The Host and the Parasite by Greg Felton – Jul 6, 2021 — Transcript

Mark Collett – Book Review – Reactionary Modernism – Jonathan Bowden – May 30, 2022 – Transcript

Mark Collett – Book Review – Hammer of the Patriot – Jun 27, 2022 – Transcript

Mark Collett – Book Review – The Culture of Critique – Nov 28, 2022 – Transcript

Mark Collett – Book Review – The Camp of the Saints – Jan 30, 2023 – Transcript

Mark Collett – Book Review – The Myth of German Villainy – Apr 28, 2024 – Transcript

Mark Collett – Book Review – Equal Training – Jun 30, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

 

Joel Davis: We are live.

 

Another show. It is the 20th of June, 2024.

 

Another evening in racism for all of our Australian friends and a morning in racism for our American friends. And that we do have a lot of American viewers, but this is a show about Australian politics usually, and we’ll be talking about things very Australian this evening. The three of us attended quite an interesting event last night. We’re going to probably spend a lot of time talking about that.

 

But before we get into that subject, I guess it would be customary to do a little bit of small talk while people fill up the chat and so on.

 

So do you have any irritations, Blair, to report on what has been grinding your gears over the past week? Because usually you come up with funny little things to be annoyed by and it can be quite humorous.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, yeah, I’m a king of small talk. Speaking of small talk, though, we’re not going to be reading out most Superchats during the stream this time or this week because after I did that last week, I had an avalanche of complaints saying:

 

“Blair, you’re interrupting the flow of the conversation!”

 

I’m like, fuck!

 

All right, so we’ll do Superchats at the end, unless, look, it’s going to be at my discretion.

 

Joel Davis: Do it at breaks in topics, I think. Yeah, I think it was a break in a topic. It’s all right.

 

But yeah, don’t interrupt yourself, or a subject to interject with it because usually Superchats, quite frivolous.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

But like I said, it’ll be at my discretion.

 

So if I see one that I really do want to include in the conversation, I’ll do it.

 

Joel Davis: If you send a good Superchat that’s actually relevant to what’s being discussed, then, yeah, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: If it’s relevant, I think it should be mentioned on the spot. But if it’s like:

 

“What’s your favorite Claude Van Damme movie?”

 

Then maybe at the end.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I’ve been thinking a lot about the event we went to be honest, and I’ve been thinking about what happened there, just interpreting everything, trying to come to a conclusion about it.

 

So, look, I haven’t really got it in me to be ranting too much about anything frivolous. We can do that. As the show progresses, I’m sure something’s going to come to mind, something that irritates me.

 

Joel Davis: I feel like. I think the people at home have noticed, like, Blair has changed. We’ve gone into a new phase of Blair ever since, particularly the laptop. You just seem so much more energised about nationalism and politics.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s you guys. It’s the audience as well. We get so much engagement on this. And you, Joel, you got a positive attitude. Tom’s always fighting. Everyone’s always positive. It’s just white pilled me, man. I gotta say. It’s white pilled me. It’s brought me back. So thanks, guys. You’ve brought me back. Your energy, your support, it’s got me believing again.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s real.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s real.

 

Thomas Sewell: Cause I know you, and that’s real. I don’t know if the audience wouldn’t know how real that is the audience would be like, yeah, like, Blair kind of dropped off a little bit, kind of had a break, or kind of was like focused on Covid, and people would be like:

 

“Oh, now he’s back.”

 

But they don’t know, like, because when you’re someone’s friend, you can feel what they. What they’re feeling. You have that empathy going through upf and how bright you’ve burned. Like, you were just this charging Aryan fire of this Germanic, Celtic youth spirit of the country and that. No one ever talks about how much energy that actually requires. You know what I mean? Like people think all players just built like.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like that.

 

Thomas Sewell: He’s just built like that it’s like:

 

“Well, yeah, he is, because, …”

 

Blair Cottrell: He can do it, but only no.

 

Thomas Sewell: One really, energy that actually your whole life force, your whole life energy was like hundred percent. Like, people don’t realize what a hundred percent dedication is unless they saw you for that 18 month or two year period. Yeah, it was like a sprint. It was like an uphill sprint for almost two years straight.

 

Blair Cottrell: And I loved it! I loved one of our old supporters who Tom. He was at this event we attended last night. And I had him on camera, actually I posted some footage earlier today. He asked me, do. Do you miss it, Blair? Do you miss the activism? And I honestly answered, yes.

 

There’s nothing about it that I miss so much as the struggle, the fights, constantly, every day, having more to do, more content to make, more to promote, more to organize, more to show up to. Look, I am back. I’m still back from the standpoints that I’m going to provide a sort of median level of commentary. You know, I’m going to create a pipeline. You know what I’m like, right? I want to keep it clean and I want to observe. That’s what I’m back to do more than anything. Just observe and contribute where necessary.

 

But, yeah, thanks, everyone, for your support. And I want to get right into this event that happened last night because.

 

Joel Davis: I want to make one brief comment on what you said.

 

I think it’s very important to meditate on the notion that fighting is funnier than winning, that the struggle is actually more enjoyable than the victory. This is what Nietzsche was getting at with this concept of the “will to power” and “to love one’s fate” and so on.

 

And his philosophy was this insight that actually the struggle is what is most enjoyable, the process. And that sometimes the worst thing that can ever happen to you is to achieve something, and then you don’t know what to do next.

 

And so it’s so important to have something that you’re actually fighting for with your life so that you can actually be enjoyable. Nothing else is more enjoyable than taking it to the enemy on a daily basis and feeling like everything that you’re doing is imbued with meaning and purpose.

 

And I think from observing you, from meeting you a year and a half ago, a bit longer now to now, and seeing just kind of being your friend for that period of time, what I noticed was, I think you got really demoralized by Covid. But what seemed to demoralize you even prior to that, was just like the way that the state came after you and your previous projects fell apart. And this sense of the movement basically entering into a phase where it was no longer on upward trajectory.

 

I mean, Tom was doing his thing with his organization, but Tom was then in jail for ages. And after the Brenton Tarrant* shooting and the way that the state cracked down upon the movement and the media, basically locked everybody out. It was a time when you could actually be part of the public conversation.

 

[* The Christchurch mosque shootings were two consecutive mass shootings on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand on 15 March 2019. They were committed by Brenton Tarrant who entered both mosques during Friday prayer, firstly at the Al Noor Mosque at 1:40 pm and later at the Linwood Islamic Centre at 1:52 pm Tarrant was arrested after his vehicle was rammed by a police unit as he was driving to a third mosque in Ashburton. Source: Wikipedia]

 

Then you were locked out, you dragged through the courts on bullshit charges. People, I’m sure, know the story, but the point is that all of that really worked quite successfully and all the de-platforming and so on, it worked quite successfully to completely destroy what you were doing.

 

And then, you know, it seemed like you were. I don’t mean like lost in life, but you didn’t have that same reason to get up every morning that you did for a few years, you had reasons to get up, but it wasn’t quite the same. Like, you weren’t on a mission, you went on a quest for the Grail, and, like, every day there’s things coming at you and you’re batting off enemies and trying to, like, force things into being and, well, it’s interesting to.

 

Blair Cottrell: Get that outside perspective of what it seemed like someone just dropped something.

 

But look, I’m kind of getting used to where everything’s at in terms of tempo, what kind of content I should be creating, where I should be, when I should be there. Things have changed, you know, things have changed since I’ve actually wanted to influence people or to provide a positive influence in the community. I’ve always denied my humanity.

 

I don’t know if you guys can relate to this, or maybe the audience can. I’ve always thought I don’t need to do everything that every other human needs to do. I think I’ve spoken about this on the stream once before, but in a different subject matter and in a different way.

 

What I mean is, I used to think to myself, I don’t need to believe in anything. I don’t need to serve any purpose. I’m not weak enough to have to believe in something. That’s a human weakness. I’m going to transcend that.

 

But I don’t think it is a weakness to need to believe in something. Because believing in something is what gives you the energy, the motivation, the dedication to dedicate yourself entirely to something that you feel is important, that you feel is greater than yourself. And honestly, what is there that’s more important than your nation, your extended ethnic community and its continued existence? You know that is just like the precipice that is the peak of all things that could be important in my mind. And anyone who tries to tell me I’m evil for believing that, like, cheque yourself. Because why am I evil for wanting to protect and promote my own ethnic community group? Right?

 

Joel Davis: Well, is that off? Hitler said, the most precious thing in this world is your people. And that’s one of the truest things the great man ever said. I do want to read out a Superchat. I’m going to break the rules because White Power said:

 

“Joel, why did you slander Gigachad Mussolini?”

 

This is referring to, I guess, a Twitter comment that I left underneath a sun and radical edit. And it was this really incredible sun and rat edit.

 

I might actually pull it up and play it for you guys a bit later at the end of the show. Maybe we can analyse it, but it’s just got ancient Rome stuff mixed with Hitler stuff and it’s cool song. It’s like a funk remix of Seven Nation Army by the White Stripes.

 

And then at the end, they put a couple, like, Mussolini clips in, and I said:

 

“I’m gonna rate it nine out of ten. It was ten out of ten.”

 

And then this Mussolini. And I like Mussolini, but he’s not Hitler. You know, there’s levels. There’s levels to this. And people took it as me hating on Mussolini and saying that he’s not White and Italians aren’t White and so on.

 

[10:24]

 

Blair Cottrell: Tell us one, tell us one good thing. Tell us one great thing about Mussolini and one thing that’s really not so good, because I don’t even know much about Mussolini.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, obviously Mussolini was a great, like, he’s an incredible political innovator. I mean, he invented fascism. Uh, the way in which they, he orchestrated his political movement. It was incredible!

 

I mean, there’s a lot to respect about him. The demeanour of the guy. He’s got this kind of energy that’s just quite humorous. He’s just got that bravado, this really excessive, cartoonish bravado, but it’s very endearing.

 

The thing that I like least about Mussolini is that basically the fascist movement, while it was cool in so many respects, I’m not saying that I don’t like fascism, but it did lack the centrality of race that National Socialism had or that I would personally put within my politics. And I can understand why. Because in Italy, there wasn’t, like one cohesive, central ethnic identity. You know, northern Italian, southern Italians are quite different.

 

And so there was a sense that fixating too much upon race would alienate, you know, one half of the country from the other, differentiate them. And the whole idea was coming together in the unity of Italy.

 

But I think that that’s problematic. I think maybe if you have a country that’s built around such a large racial difference maybe that’s an incorrect way to design a country.

 

But there was a greater emphasis upon state power.

 

And while I do agree that authoritarian state power is something that should be used for good and can be used for good, I don’t think it is the be all and end all. It’s about what it’s being used for.

 

Whereas fascism kind of gives this notion that state power is kind of an end in itself, that just like, the centralization of the will in the state is itself just a grand thing. And I don’t think that’s necessarily the case. I mean, also, the Italian fascists were kind of soft on the jews. They did get harsher on the jews toward the end when they were trying to cosy up to the Germans.

 

Because you have to understand as well, the fascists and the Germans only became allies only a few years before the war. Mussolini was trying to ally himself with the Brits and with the French. To be fair, he was actually trying to bring everyone together in Europe and create a pan-European alliance against the Soviet Union and other non-European countries, which I think was a good idea. I think Mussolini was right to try and do that it’s a shame that he didn’t pull it off, but it was complex.

 

Like, people kind of see fascism and National Socialism as exactly the same thing in this one unified movement, but that actually is ahistorical. And Mussolini was seen in a positive light by European jewry and other European elements that were quite against the National Socialists in the early 1930s as, like, a positive alternative or something that wasn’t so racist and anti-semitic and so on.

 

So I think that says a lot, but that doesn’t mean that I hate Mussolini or I have zero respect for Mussolini. No, I think fascism has no cool ideas. It does. It was obviously a movement of the Right. It was a movement that was against communism.

 

So obviously that makes it fundamentally good. Anything that destroys communism is good, and it had many good elements. And it wasn’t like they were totally. They weren’t like, opening the borders, the brown and black immigrants or anything.

 

So it wasn’t like they were totally, like, cucked on race to some totally unacceptable degree without destroying their, like, what’s happening now to Italy and the rest of other Western countries.

 

So, it’s a nuanced thing.

 

It’s like I don’t hate fascism or Mussolini, but also I don’t revere them as highly as I or him or revere the fascist Italian state as highly as I revere other things.

 

But anyway, we managed to do a little bit of small talk, so I succeeded.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s Joel’s version of small talk, guys. That’s what we deal with down here in Melbourne. So, like I said, though, I’d like to jump onto talking about the event that happened last night. All three of us were there. What did you guys think?

 

Joel Davis: I’ll let Tom go first.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I do you plan on uploading the interview you did with me, just out of curiosity? It depends on how I answer the question, because I won’t double up on that if you’re going to., …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I won’t probably get it up until after the weekend because I am travelling up to Brisbane, well, just below Brisbane tomorrow morning. I’ve had work today. I only had time to get that little quick clip up. And my intention with that clip was just to., … It’s the same every time. I’d make content in the past as well, to normalize the people who are in attendance, because they’re going to be slandered eventually as Right-wing crack, far-Right neo-Nazi conspiracy theorists, just to show that it’s regular working people that go.

 

But more than anything, that there are people who attend events like this in quite large numbers, that it’s not something that’s niche and fringe and only a few people are sitting around a table. There’s hundreds of people that are interested in these things, in these talking points, and I think it’s really important to get that across to anyone who’s interested, because I think what holds people back from participating in politics like this is they think that no one else is doing it.

 

So it’s really important, I think, just to get those visual messages out there to help everyone understand that there’s a lot of people who care about their country, there’s a lot of people who want to do something about the corrupt establishment. But I already got takes from both you guys on camera, but is there anything that you want to talk about specifically? I mean, I got there early. People were rocking up like a good 45 minutes early. That’s when I arrived. I didn’t think I’d get there that early. I ended up leaving work early, had coffee, something to eat, heard the opening speeches, spoke to Matt Trihey again. And Tom and I have both worked for Matt Trihey. He’s a builder down here in Melbourne.

 

Joel Davis: He’s the guy who organized the event, by the way, for the benefit.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I should have mentioned that. Sorry. Yeah, but that’s.

 

Joel Davis: His organization is called the Australian Workers Alliance, [National Workers Alliance] I believe. National workers, all national workers are.

 

Blair Cottrell: Sorry, my apologies, but NWA, the new boys in the Hood. Tom.

 

Thomas Sewell: Weakness with attitude.

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s a good guy.

 

Joel Davis: Well, they’re not wignats, though. Hey. They’re not wignats. Very optical, very good. Very good optics.

 

And also, I think the website is workers.org dot au for those who want to go and check out their website. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And, yeah, you can. I can assess that. This guy’s character, like, I. He’s a better man than me. He’s a hard worker. This guy has dedicated his whole life to providing the highest level of building services to specific clientele. And people seek him out to build high quality homes for them, like, high end homes. I’ve done stuff on his jobs that I never thought I’d do, like, spiral staircases. And I learned how to sort of assemble and use a concrete hole corer, by myself. I worked with steel, a lot of steel and concrete, which is not something that I experienced very much before working for Mattie Trihey.

 

But the fact that he put this event on is awesome, and it was really good to talk to him again. Bit of a blast from the past, actually. Running in swim. How long has it been since you’ve seen him, Tom?

 

Thomas Sewell: Recently? I’ve seen him in the city. When we do our protests, they organize in the city as well. So every protest that we did we would cross paths with them.

 

Blair Cottrell: Mattie Trihey, he’s been involved in protests in the city leading up to this event that he just hosted. Is that right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. So he was involved with the Freedom Rally organizers, and I believe that the main group of Freedom Rally organizers were doing, like, welcome to countries. And they were doing the whole liberal outlook on being anti-Covid. So not freedom because there are ancient rights, not freedom because it’s about respect. And that we’re like a noble people and we’re not to be treated by the State. That’s meant to serve us as a bureaucratic function. You know, people weren’t arguing from that angle. A lot of the anti-vaxxers were arguing, like, from this. They would do a “Welcome to Country” for Aboriginals. First they would talk about how this is infringing on these poor and disadvantaged groups, and they were coming from the weak position, not the strong position.

 

So obviously, that was going to create a natural split with a more Right-wing version of the anti-vax movement. And that’s what he’s led since day one.

 

Blair Cottrell: So the event organizer, Maddy Trihey, what we’re saying, what you’re saying there is he was involved in the anti-vax kind of freedom rallies that took place in Melbourne. Was he a director? I don’t think he was a direct organizer. I think he attended the rallies himself and then gradually became a prominent figure through giving speeches and networking.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s what all of them were. None of them were leaders. Who are these guys? What was it like, Harrison and all these people, have you. Had you ever heard of them before?

 

Blair Cottrell: I suppose they are truly grassroots guys. Like, these are people who come from salt of the earth working class. They’re not people who are raised in the universities in order to be professional politicians. Right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

[20:12]

 

Thomas Sewell: So, like, when UPF started, there was a lot of people, old heads in the movement, that were quite skeptical of us because they were like, who are these guys? Where have these guys come from? Like we were kind of getting accusations and that we weren’t innate grassroots, because we went from just random people on the street, not involved in politics, to political leaders just overnight.

 

So I think Covid was no different. It was another wave. Every time there’s chaos, there’s a new wave of potential political leaders that sort of just appear out of the ether. Not in a bad way, just in a way.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, my general consensus on the event itself is you could tell that it was kind of thrown together, but it was organized as well as it could have been. Probably given the experience of the people who are organizing it. I can’t really throw too much shade on it. Like, there was food, we ran out of water, but everything else was great. The speeches were good. The event went for about four. You run out of beer too? Yeah, right.

 

Joel Davis: No, no, we didn’t run out of beer.

 

Thomas Sewell: Hall energy to it, just.

 

Joel Davis: It did a good Polish beers. You know, it’s hard to find Polish beer in Australia. It was a nice change.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, it’s even harder to find a hall full of sensible men who want to talk about politics. That’s just not something you find in Australia.

 

So it was a really different evening, one that I wish we could have more often. I wish every week, like on Wednesday night, for example, or Friday night, we could go to a hall, have a few drinks and just talk about the state of the country and what we’re going to do about it. I think that was a very common state of circumstances for pre-war Germany and even Germany after the war. I think that’s what men and everywhere.

 

Thomas Sewell: Even the Anglo-sphere, there was a culture. After work, there would be these huge gatherings at the pub, not like it is now, where it’s later in the night and, it’s people just going out of party and get absolutely sloshed. People would go straight from work.

 

So they’re still kind of in this functioning political mode versus there wasn’t a, …

 

Joel Davis: Bunch of Pokemon TVs with the footy on and people betting on sports and music playing over, like, because they didn’t have the technology for any of that stuff yet.

 

So people would go to the pub and they’d sit around and talk or they’d sing, they’d sing songs as well. That used to be common in pubs. We don’t do that anymore. That’s why in Europe they’ve got this like singing culture that we don’t have here because it’s a legacy from how pub culture was before televisions and you know, like modern technology was developed and so, yeah, like it used to be this hub of the community where there would be a genuine exchange of ideas and obviously that was a kind of political focal point in a town and that no longer really exists.

 

But I mean I think you’re under selling it, Blair. Like the fact that this was their first ever event and they got over 300 people, maybe 400 people to their event, I think is incredible! I mean how often do people get that kind of numbers to a very large, like numbers that large to their first ever event?

 

And it’s like this guy is like a big, you know, political commentator and he’s been in the movement like he’s an activist and obviously that’s how he got these people here because he’s a kind of experienced activist but he isn’t like this super well known guy or anything.

 

So the fact that he could mobilize that is testament I think, to really, really high quality, just like grassroots organizing.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s respect. It’s not just high quality organization, it’s respect. People respect Matt Trihey, people respect Nick Patterson. People are interested in hearing what Damien Richardson has to say. Damien Richardson’s a great speaker, by the way. I can see why people want to listen to him. The way he delivers his points makes his analogies fantastic! He could have been a comedian. Maybe he’s tried to do that in the past. He seems like he has some experience in that, which is fantastic!

 

Joel Davis: He was an actor, right?

 

Blair Cottrell: And then comedians and actors are kind of the same branch on the same tree, right?

 

Thomas Sewell: He’s got a lot of animation. He’s certainly very passionate and I think that’s a genuine passion. I don’t think he’s actually acting. I think he’s got the experience of being able to inject unique energy and there were times where he was funny. Like it was actually really enjoyable to watch and it is rare to be able to successfully do that. So he’s definitely a talent, he’s definitely a leader, on the rise. It’s interesting.

 

Blair Cottrell: Most of them, even more rare is hearing so much Australian, Australian TV personality speak openly and with sympathy in regards to White Australia. You just don’t see that very often. And that was really refreshing.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, he’s definitely a model. Like a role model in that sense where so many of these actors and celebrities and people within I guess that privileged class, obviously he’s been booted from the class now as he was saying in a speech, he’s working in construction now, which is, I mean that’s all dissidents go basically. Yeah, we’re, basically, we’re all like:

 

“I’m in construction now as well!”

 

I mean people that knew me when I joined the movement, I was almost the first one of the furthest, because the army is very, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Who would have thought though? Who would have thought? Honest men have to do honest work.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, exactly! It’s cosmic! It’s beautiful! Yeah, it is. I was actually thinking about that a lot today, how I thought that political dissidents would have just endless spare time and I had this kind of revolutionary idea that we didn’t have. I guess when I was younger I thought that’s what a revolutionary did. They didn’t have a job, they didn’t get a trade, they didn’t learn any skills because they were just solely dedicated to bringing down the state.

 

And I thought about how that’s kind of a lightning and sun perspective. If you’re pure lightning then that would make sense because your goal is a purely almost destructive energy like to just bring down the state. But we are all, everything we do in our lives is character building so that we actually can be leaders of a future ethno-state. That’s how our lives are developing. Everything we’re learning, all our interactions, our physical training as well. Almost all the men like so yourself, myself, Joel, you’ve got Damian Richardson, you’ve got Matt Trihey, you got Nick Patterson, you got Craig Cole. All these men that I just mentioned are all fit, they’re all fit and healthy and trained like Matt Trihey. He’s like 60 and the guy looks 40.

 

Blair Cottrell: He was a mixed martial artist. He used to fight. He had a few professional fights when he was a bit younger.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, he was.

 

Blair Cottrell: Damien Richardson has his own website too, guys, which is just his full name. DamienRichardson.online. I haven’t checked out that site yet but not sure what you’ll find there. If you guys are interested in knowing.

 

Joel Davis: More speeches were broadcast live so I’m sure we’ll post them on social media in some way. So you guys can go and watch them or you can cheque it out for yourself if you’re interested, because I’m sure they’re out there. You can watch the replay. Damien’s speech in particular was, I thought, really, really good.

 

As Tom says, he’s a brilliant orator. He’s very talented. I mean, he’s just made to do basically what we’re doing on here, be brilliant live streaming. He had a radio show, and he would have been brilliant on the radio. I think he does do streaming, so I think if you check out his website that you just mentioned, I think he does periodically do streaming. Yeah, I think he’s a real asset to the movement because of his just erudition, intelligence, his ability to convey a message that I think normal people can connect with. And he’s very engaging and funny. His speech was great. I really enjoyed it.

 

I mean, I was a few beers deep, so maybe I enjoyed it more because of that. But it was still a really good speech. And I did appreciate the way that he actually pushed the envelope he talked about. He made clear references to jewish control of the media and influence over our political system. He defended the principle of the Anzacs, the men who fought in the Second World War, they were fighting for White Australia. So clearly a very based individual. And that’s a message that almost no one is promoting. And that’s the message that is the most important message to promote.

 

I mean, particularly what he said about White Australia and the people that were sitting there. I mean, it was billed as was talking about protecting children from the LGBTQ agenda and mass immigration. That’s what it was. Bill. These are the two, according to Matt, and I think Matt is correct to identify. These are the two key issues politically of our time, what they’re doing to families and what they’re doing to the nation. And the two things are interrelated.

 

I said this today on Twitter, that everything that is happening ultimately boils down to the ruling class is attacking our blood, whether it be on the microcosm, on the family level, trying to destroy, sexually pervert our children, prevent people from getting married, prevent people from having children, you know, promote all the things that they promote, feminism, LGBT, pornography, degeneracy, et cetera. All of that is about destroying the blood in the most direct way or destroying the blood of the nation through mass immigration, through anti-White discrimination, through promoting miscegenation, through elevating non-Whites into positions of power within White societies.

 

Why are they doing this? It’s because blood loyalty is the most powerful force, like in humanity, and it is the most dangerous force to the ruling class. Because the ruling class is held together by lies, deception, money, self interest. It’s not held together by a genuine self sacrifice or heart or love. None of that exists within the elite, the elite that currently rules over us. It’s pathological, it’s a tyranny precisely because it lacks that.

 

[30:18]

 

And so it fears any basis from which someone could tap into that energy and rise up and challenge them. Someone could tap into the energy of the familial and ethnic and racial bonds and say:

 

“Hey, I’m going to fight for your family. I’m going to fight for your people, against the scum that rule over you.”

 

And so they’re trying to destroy those bonds so that no one can tap into them, so that no one can challenge them.

 

And I think that’s really like the essential point of all of these people in the freedom movement, obviously they agree that there is a tyrannical elite. They all came together opposing the lockdowns and the Covid jab mandates and so on.

 

And they all believe in conspiracy theories. They talk about globalism, they talk about international cabals and the way in which democracy doesn’t really function correctly. And that there’s this kind of series of elite institutions interconnected with global elite institutions and our media that promote a political message and agenda that they impose upon the country regardless of Democratic mandate.

 

So they’re aware of that.

 

But a lot of them haven’t fully connected the dots on exactly what the agenda is about. There’s this kind of like, superficial idea that the people that are in charge, they just want to make money, or they just want power for the sake of power, and they don’t really care.

 

Like, it’s not about race, it’s not about jews versus Aryans, it’s not about any of these things. They just believe in all these wacky communist ideas and they just want more and more power for the sake of power. No. People want power for the sake of power. Doing something with power. Power is a means to an end. It isn’t an end in itself. And yes, they want money. Yes, they want to ingratiate themselves. Yes, they want to ascend hierarchies.

 

And a lot of the people who work in politics and media, they just parrot what they’re supposed to parrot so that they can do that. But those people don’t actually have the agency over the system. The people that have the agency over the system are the ones that are actually using it for some purpose. And the ones that are using it for some purpose are using it to attack your family and your race because they’re afraid of the Whiteman. They’re afraid of the Whiteman more than anyone because if the Whiteman came together, we could overthrow them and they know it. And they built this entire system on the basis, on the basis of defeating us, like we previously ran the world and then they took over.

 

So the entire new system is built around preventing us from taking it back because we used to be in charge. We were the previous rulers. The new rule is obviously whenever you get a phase shift in politics, the new ideology is always built around stopping whoever previously ran shit from being able to run shit!

 

So, for example, when liberalism began, it was built around not letting monarchs and aristocrats rule things because they were the previous rulers. Or communism is built around the idea we can’t let capitalists rule things as they were the previous rulers or whatever.

 

And so this current system is built around we can’t let White men, White nations have sovereignty because then they’re too powerful and then we can’t control the world. They become too powerful. The world basically is their oyster.

 

So that’s what this is all about. And that was kind of, they didn’t quite go there, but they were kind of edging these people in that direction.

 

And I think the vast majority of the audience was quite receptive. And the elements that weren’t receptive, they didn’t look like a lot of them seemed like they, like there was a few people there that were mixed race couples that didn’t seem too happy about the message and left early. And there was a few other older ladies that seemed a little bit offended by some of the rhetoric.

 

But overall I would say 80, 90% of the audience seemed quite captivated and interested and receptive to what they were hearing.

 

So that’s quite interesting because this is not an audience of White nationalists. This is an audience of, what would you call them? Just concerned citizens.

 

Blair Cottrell: Disillusioned working people, man.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, concerned citizens. They are concerned citizens.

 

Blair Cottrell: 50s Internet users, over 50 many.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, that is a good point to make, is that the only youth that was there was us and other organizations that attended. So I didn’t notice too many young people that weren’t already tribe and training that weren’t already networked with an organization, so they, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, there’s not many.

 

Thomas Sewell: The system and the communists would certainly be shaking in their boots a little bit right now, because this is a grassroots success. This is stepping into a new paradigm. And the value of this is about cadre building as well. It’s about you’re having these meetings, who’s attending regularly.

 

And as Matt said at the start, education. He said:

 

“One of the most important reasons for this meeting is education.”

 

And so a lot of people might have felt afterwards that we didn’t reach any solution, you know, that it wasn’t a productive meeting because we didn’t reach a solution, because people want instant solutions. But what Matt explained the purpose of the meeting was, was education.

 

And the more people that come, and the more regularly they attend and the more these things happen, the more they start to build a political awareness. A class of people that aren’t just concerned citizens, but they’re educated concerned citizens. They’re now educated on a governing worldview, on governing principles embedded within natural law, embedded within fact and truth.

 

So they’re in the moral and logical high ground. And then now you’ve got this building population, this subpopulation, and it’s growing, and they have friends, they have family, and it bleeds through society. And that is one of those important concepts within metapolitics that we let. Maybe there’s a political solution, maybe there’s not. Why it’s irrelevant right now is whether there is or isn’t. We need a cultural and educational and informational solution in order to achieve a political solution or not, so political solutions are downstream of cadre building, they’re downstream of local community, grassroots meetings, activism, tribe and train sort of thing. So anything you’re going to say something?

 

Blair Cottrell: No. You can finish if you want. Is there something you want to finish with there?

 

Thomas Sewell: No, I can just talk forever.

 

Joel Davis: So I just want to interject. I want to interject here with RSA Liberty, who said, it’s a relevant Superchat. He said:

 

“Great to see you guys supporting other Right-wing groups. No infighting or petty territorialism. Another reason I know I’m following the Right guys also enjoyed Blair’s vlog of the event.”

 

And I think that’s actually an important point to make. We just want to see anyone who’s trying to do something good succeed. Anyone, literally anyone in Australia that’s trying to build towards, like, an actual sincere, patriotic, pro-White, pro-family politics, whatever way they want to go about it. If they’re doing it in an honest way and then they’re not screwing anybody over and they’re just trying. If they’re having a crack, Yeah, if they’re just having a crack, yeah. They have my 100% full support.

 

Blair Cottrell: But where do they go from here? That’s the thing. The next meeting they host will be the spicy one, because now all the wrong people know who they are and they’re going to be keeping an eye on what they’re going to do next. So next time they’re going to have the police.

 

Next time they’re going to have counter-protesters, next time they’re going to need a bit of security. So luckily they have the networks to acquire that for themselves. Probably through Tom and the guys. They might be able to work the, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Doors, different speakers as well.

 

So there was already different types of security there and different organizations.

 

So it was like a community defence.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Nick Patterson has his guys, that Craig Cole guy, he runs a martial arts gym as well. You know, there was lots of different crews down there, so it was full unity. It was full Right-wing unity.

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re going to need it. They’re going to need it because I don’t think anyone thought it was going to be that big of a meeting and that many people were going to attend on the very first try, the very first event. So, like I said, the next one will be spicy.

 

I asked a question during Q and A and the purpose of the question was to try to signal to the speakers, the organizers of the events, that it’s important to have the people who attend the event leave the event having remembered a very simple dynamic or having a remembered something that they can take away from the event and sort of apply to their daily philosophy. So I asked:

 

“What is the movements’ or the collection of organizations that have organized that event, what is your goal and who is your enemy?”

 

And that’s very important dynamic to establish. It can sometimes be difficult to do because you might have a convoluted idea of what’s happening. You might see the enemy as the system. The problem with that, though, is it doesn’t really pin anything down. It doesn’t identify the people behind and within the system who are your enemy. Right? And you don’t necessarily have to use language like, “it’s the jews”, but you can deliver a message to people in such a way where they understand who the enemy is. You can also help people understand what the goal is, the preservation or protection of the Australian nation, for example. Everyone can get behind that.

 

[40:13]

 

So your goal needs to be something that everyone can get behind, and your enemy needs to be understood as something palpable, something that can be seen, something that does exist, that is evil.

 

So this is what we believe, up with the Australian nation, that over there is the enemy, down with them. And that’s what appeals to the average person. Establishing that dynamic as a movement leader, an event organizer, as a public speaker, it’s very important. It’s what people are receptive to. It doesn’t matter how you feel about this. It doesn’t matter if you’re like:

 

“Oh, I don’t want to oversimplify things.”

 

Too bad. You have to oversimplify things in order for your message to be understood by the ordinary people, the working class people who are going to be attending events like this in the future.

 

So that was the reason I asked the question that I asked, and I hope the organizers understand that and sort of formulate a better answer to that question, meaning creating a nice, easy to understand “us versus them” dynamic. But, Joe, you are paradigms.

 

Joel Davis: I think the simple paradigm that they could use if they don’t necessarily want to go too spicy, is just do the classic “globalism versus nationalism”. There was a lot of talk of globalism and nationalism through the speeches. It corresponds with the rhetoric they’re already putting down.

 

Blair Cottrell: But simple answer is what needed to be said. That’s the simple thing that people needed to leave with. This is what I was trying to say. People needed to be warned. Walking out of there feeling good, feeling like they had support, feeling strong, feeling like, okay, I’m a nationalist and my enemy is the globalists. Right, that’s a good start. You can start with that and you can build on that from there to make it a little bit more radical, I suppose, a little bit more fundamental.

 

Joel Davis: I mean, there was a lot of pro-White rhetoric that was interlayed in discussion of explicitly of White interests. And Jared Taylor was mentioned, pathological altruism. There was a lot of good talking points. Matt himself and Damien particularly brought up in what they had to say. I enjoyed the other speaker that was there. He wasn’t there to speak so much about immigration. He was there to speak about the LGBTQ whatever agenda. And he spoke very well, very forcefully. I think he used to work in the education system.

 

So he had a lot of experience with how this degenerate shit is interwoven into the school system. Obviously a very important issue. And it was good to see him on stage with nationalists, you know, bringing those two issues together because nationalists were pretty much the only people like the Christians as well, will do something.

 

But yeah, we’ve really been leading the charge.

 

I mean, how many Drag Queen Story Hours have we either protested or shut down over the past year or two? I mean, so many.

 

I mean, I know that myself personally, Drag Queen Story Hours that I have targeted and obviously everyone has helped and the drag help. Yeah, yeah. And the threat of Tom and the boys showing up definitely gets a lot of these things shut down. Definitely! And we’ve got, he, I don’t know, count maybe like 20, 20 plus of these things shut down.

 

So yeah, and then we’ve shown up to a few as well.

 

And so we’ve been putting in the work and it’s good to see that there’s a kind of, there needs to be unity on the Right around that issue. That’s something that everyone can agree on.

 

And I think it’s a good thing for nationalists to keep chipping away at with the rest of the Right-wing to say:

 

“Hey, like, we’re the fighters of the Right-wing. You guys need to start getting with the program on the other issues that we care about and realising that we are your friends and you’re not going to get anywhere, really. The Right-wing is not going to get anywhere without us. We’re the real fighters, we’re the real radicals. We’re the real high energy people in the movement!”

 

So if the Right-wing wants to get anything done, it needs to include us. It’s as simple as that. And insofar as it has been excluding us and not these particular people, obviously, but in general, as, insofar as conservatives and Right-wing elements have excluded us for the sake of optics and not wanting to have the association, what they have done is they’ve put all their fighters on the sideline and then lost every single battle. They’ve lost every single battle for decades until they can actually start using their fighters rather than sidelining us because we’re too edgy.

 

The reason why we’re edgy is because we’re the fighters. That’s what? Like the Left has their fighters. The Left-wing fighters are like pro-pedophilia, communist demons. The Left doesn’t sideline their fighters. They put their insane nut job fighters out into the field and they go and get shit done. And they’re turning your kid into a tranny.

 

So you need to the Right needs to start using us. And yeah, they’re going to get called names by the media and so on, but if you use this, if you use this enough, eventually no one cares anymore. It just becomes normal.

 

Like, they can moan and cry, but if the Right-wing just doesn’t care and just keeps using us again and again and again and again, eventually that will just be seen as how politics works.

 

So the Left has done, we could get on here and talk about, or the mainstream Right-wing media can go on about Antifa and communists and blah, blah, blah. Does it, does the Left give a shit? No! Does the public give a shit? No, it doesn’t.

 

Obviously there’s opposition to these things, but it doesn’t prevent them from winning elections, it doesn’t prevent them from functioning as a robust and effective political force. They’re fucking winning.

 

So, yeah, the Right, if the Right wants to actually win, and the problem is a lot of the people in the institutional Right don’t want to win! A lot of them are professional losers. They’re paid off by jews, they’re non-White themselves.

 

And so they feel more threatened by us than by their supposed political opponents on the left when they’re so-called based Right-wing non-Whites. But the true normal White Right-winger, who genuinely cares about the issues that they purport to care about, they need to start fighting to put us on the team and get us on the team if they want to start winning.

 

And the only way that Australia would be fixed is if you get the radicals, the nationalists on the team.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, well, it was great that Matt was so welcoming because a lot of people, I just expected it because I’ve known that for years, but I got so many messages from people saying:

 

“How are you received? How are you?”

 

Like, it was on the consciousness, on the political consciousness of a lot of people within the wider movement. They were very curious as to how the meeting went. Not just as a meeting, but the dynamic between work was people in the crowd, you know, positive towards us:

 

“Were they curious? Were the organizers positive or curious and just what’s the state of Right-wing unity at the moment? What’s the state of pro-White unity? And is the pro-White crowd expanding that? Are we becoming more normalized within the open window without removing any of our radical and truthful components?”

 

Joel Davis: I just want to say “Hi!” to also to all the grannies. There was a few other I’m not saying that you’re all grannies, because there were some women that come to me that weren’t grannies. They were much younger, that you’re definitely not grannies. But there were some grannies that came up to me and said:

 

“I love what you do, and we love the show!”

 

And so on.

 

So there’s Granny Waffen out there watching the show every week. I just want to say hello to Granny Waffen. And actually, I’ve actually encountered Granny Waffen at other events before. It’s very endearing. It feels good. And there was one of the granny Waffen who came up to me and she said something along the lines of:

 

“They were trying to make us hate you guys and think that you guys were bad actors, but I know that you’re not. I know that you guys are good boys!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Who’s they? What do they mean by “they were”?

 

Thomas Sewell: Trying to make some of the other. The Left-wing Freedom rally organizers were telling their constituents, their cohort, that these people are feds, these people are bad agents, these people are here to make us look bad. And you’ve got two kinds of grandmas politically. You’ve got racist grandmas, and you’ve got refugee grandmas. And racist grandmas are like the loving, caring, nurturing, motherly grandmas, and they’re the best.

 

And then we have the best grandmas, as Trump would probably say, we have. We have the best grandmas. Like, our movement has.

 

Joel Davis: Nobody has grandmas like our grandmas!

 

Thomas Sewell: Nobody has grandmas like our movement. And our grandmas are so loving, they’re so caring. Um, you know, we just have the best grandmas!

 

Whereas the Left, they get the freak grandmas! They get the grandmas that aren’t even grandmas! Like, they just have a dog, or they have brown children, or they’re like witches. They’re like the Wicked Witches. And we get the good witches, we get the old grandmas that, like, make cakes, and they, like, say:

 

“You know, that the country’s gone the wrong way and we really need to fix it. And I’m putting a lot of hope in you!”

 

And we just get awesome grandmas like that. And every freedom rally thing I’ve ever been to, grandmas are the first to come up to me like, tom, Tom, Tom, and I’m just like, why do grandmas love me? This is crazy! Yeah, we’re the most radical, but they’ve got a feeling that they’ve got a sense. They don’t care about the propaganda, they don’t care. It doesn’t matter. They’re just eternal sense.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know what else they don’t care about? They don’t care about having their faces seen at these events, which is something a lot of people still care a lot about. I was approached by several people saying:

 

“Blair, I noticed you were filming for a bit there. Can, can you make sure I’m not in that?”

 

Even though they’re just attending the rally now, I don’t want to throw dirt on anyone. I know people have their reasons for wanting to stay anonymous, but what do you guys think about that? I want to open up this subject because I’ve got a little bit to say about it. What do you think about anonymity?

 

[50:21]

 

Thomas Sewell: I just wrote a big essay on it, it must be in the hive mind, because just about three minutes before we went live, I just wrote an essay on it.

 

Blair Cottrell: So we’re well equipped for the discussion.

 

Thomas Sewell: If you guys want to go. Yeah, let’s go. Let’s do it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I can open up, I suppose, and I can begin with where I began in Australian nationalism, which was a think tank, a club called Nationalist Alternative. First group I ever met with, they were just people who got together maybe once a month, some older guys, some younger guys, just to talk, eat some food, nothing serious.

 

On the very rare occasion they do a letterbox drop for Australia, first party or something. But there was no real activism. But I was young. I was about 19 or 20 years old when I first engaged with this group. This is when I was first looking for an Australian nationalist group on the Internet and I found this one. And I wanted my friends to get into this as well, when I first met these guys.

 

So there was about 12 or 13 guys meeting once a month.

 

And I thought:

 

“We need more people. We need to make this bigger, more popular, more powerful. We need to create a counterculture.”

 

That’s what I wanted to do. I wanted to get my girlfriend involved, I wanted her friends being involved but every time I tried to take a photo or get some footage of everyone together, everyone had an issue with it:

 

“No, I don’t want my face in that. No, I don’t want to be associated with this.”

 

And I thought, it’s really frustrating because I thought:

 

“Well, how are we ever going to grow this community if we don’t have people who are open and proud of what they believe, unashamed? How is anyone ever going to know about it? How are we going to make this popular and powerful?”

 

And I realized over time that this fear, this paranoia, this tendency to want to remain anonymous and operate in the shadows. It has plagued Australian nationalism for ages, since I first got involved and probably long before I got involved, and that’s before it was really edgy.

 

I mean, when I was 19, YouTube was full of Hitler speeches and clever edits of William Luther Pierce speeches, which, you know, contributed to my development, my understanding of what was going on in the world. That stuff was just available everywhere. The Internet was just completely open. And even back then, people were just like:

 

“Oh, I don’t want to be seen with this. I can’t be seen to be associated!”

 

You can’t be seen to associate with what? A bunch of people talking about loving their country and wanting to protect their extended ethnic community? Like, why can’t you be seen associating with that? Like I said, I don’t want to throw too much shade on anyone. And I know everyone has their reasons for wanting to do whatever it is they’re doing, but if you’re never going to be known for what you truly believe and stand for, then what you truly believe and stand for is never going to become known, certainly not popular or powerful. You need to be unashamed, you need to be bold. You need to be brave, and you need to understand that the consequences people like myself have suffered really aren’t that bad.

 

I mean, I’m starting to think that the closure of bank accounts was a clever ploy by the government to actually try to strike terror into people who were thinking about associating with or getting involved in rationalism. Because, yeah, we were talking about this last night, and it got me thinking because we still bank. All I did was start up an account.

 

Joel Davis: Shut down means is you just have to move to another bank and then transfer your money there. They don’t steal your money.

 

Blair Cottrell: And this is not only that, but it keeps you on your toes.

 

Joel Davis: Minor inconvenience it is.

 

Blair Cottrell: And that’s all it’s ever been from the beginning. Even the legal charges, really, for me, it was a minor inconvenience. I’d been to court before that, when I was younger. I was accustomed to it.

 

But I think the problem is its especially true of the younger guys, a lot of whom want to stay anonymous. They’ve never been to jail, they’ve never been charged with anything. They haven’t been to prison. They haven’t really been on the wrong side of the law, many of them have never even had a parking fine.

 

And so I think they fear stepping over that boundary where suddenly they’re known to the state for the wrong reasons.

 

But you can’t fear that it’s like if you’re going to fear that, you’re just going to perpetually live in subordination to this system and the people who control it. I think I’ve said enough on the matter. What do you think, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, I just want to reiterate that point about the banking. I mean, we talk about it because it’s an important propagandistic function to say, how come our guys will get their bank account taken away because they go to a peaceful protest on behalf of White Australians.

 

But then pedophiles can have a bank account. Like, it doesn’t actually make any sense. Like, it’s totally fucked in the head, obviously!

 

So it’s an important propaganda point to make. But people then get afraid, like:

 

“Oh, the system. I could be put on the list by ASIO.”

 

And what is ASIO [Australian Security Intelligence Organization] gonna do with that list? I’ve been on ASIO’s list for years. Who cares? Like, ASIO can look at my text messages. I don’t do anything illegal. And ASIO is like:

 

“Oh, yep, he doesn’t seem to be doing any terrorism this week. We’ll keep an eye on him.”

 

And that’s literally it. There’s no second phase. Tom has been dragged before the courts in an unfair way, but they were through. Like, he got into a fight with people. Like, okay, it was unfair what they did to him because he was defending himself or defending his friend.

 

But it wasn’t like they just rounded him up and arrested him just because he was being a White nationalist. They waited for some opportunity to construct the case against him. And this is Australia’s most prominent White nationalist. You showing up as just some guy, no one knows who you are in a T-shirt, some event where you just sit on a seat and listen to a few speeches and go home, and then people can see you in the background of some video footage. What do you think is going to happen from that? Nothing is going to happen from that it’s just ridiculous to be that afraid. Your face isn’t that distinctive. No one knows who you are.

 

Now I get it. If you’re, like, trying to work in some government department or you’re trying to become a lawyer or become some high powered business executive, or something in a big company. And you really got this really sensitive career path. I can understand being cautious, but almost no one is like that. Almost no one actually has a sensitive career path. Most people just have normal jobs. I’ve had plenty of normal jobs in different industries. I’ve never had issues because of who I am. And I’m out and proud. Open news articles get written about me. I get hit pieces written about me by foreign organizations. We had foreign intelligence agencies doing reports on our show. We had the ADL, the SPLC, all these American Leftist organizations writing articles that reference me and talk about me and Antifa and so on.

 

None of that’s going to happen to you because you’re not Joel Davis, you’re not Thomas Sowell, you’re not Blair Cottrell, you’re some guy that no one even knows your name standing at a political event. So it really isn’t that big of a deal. I don’t know. I’m not saying to be cavalier about these things, take as many precautions as possible.

 

But when the precautions prevent you from even participating in an event where you go:

 

“Oh, I don’t want to go down to that rally or that speech or something because I don’t want to be seen to associate with these people.”

 

It becomes to the point where it’s actually preventing you from even being a political activist because of a totally unjustified fear. We’re not, it’s not illegal to be a White nationalist. And if you’re seen on video footage, it’s actually pretty hard for them to figure out who you are just based upon that. Usually it takes more than that for them to be able to identify you. And if you’re not putting yourself forward as like a speaker or as a leader or as a member of an organization.

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re just an observer.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly!

 

Then there’s no risk under the, under those circumstances. And you can take precautions. Pay cash instead of card. Tell, when you introduce yourself, tell them a fake name or only your first name, or don’t mention where you live, don’t mention what you do for work. Just be vague about who you are but still show up and be smart. Don’t trust random people with sensitive information.

 

But yeah, look at the effects of de-banking.

 

Blair Cottrell: When you look at the effects of closing the bank accounts of activists, it doesn’t stop those activists from banking, as we just described. You just go to a different bank and open a new account. So closing bank accounts, de-banking, hasn’t stopped us from banking, in effect.

 

So what effect has it had? The effect it has had is it could only be described as “social terrorism”. It’s “social terror”. It makes people too afraid to associate with our kind of politics, even if they do believe it, because they’re like:

 

“Oh, my God, I’m not going to be able to use a bank!”

 

But that’s not actually the reality of how de-banking works. You get a letter, you get 30 days to move your money into a new account, and that’s the process of the whole thing. It’s really not that serious.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I’ve never been charged with a crime because of anything I’ve done to do with the movement. And I’ve done all the different kinds of activism. I’ve said all the kinds of edgy things on the Internet with my real name and face. You’re not going to go to jail unless you, …

 

I mean, yeah, like, they will treat you unjustly when you’re doing street activism. Like, you know, Tom’s dealing with police harassment over the Ballarat rally, and we’ve got guys that are getting harassed because one guy has a necklace that is a swastika but not a Hakenkreuz, or people threw Roman before it was made illegal and these kinds of things.

 

[1:00:23]

 

But if you don’t be that provocative and you’re not like a prominent, open public member of, like a National Socialist organization or something like that’s very on the edge and even. And all those guys don’t give a fuck about being dragged before the courts. They’ll gladly do it. It’s an opportunity to get in the news and to make an activistic point about:

 

“Look at this state tyranny. Look at how they’re treating us!”

 

But if you don’t want to be a sacrificial lamb like that, I understand that that’s not for everyone. You just simply not behave like that you can just be cautious and be sensible and even behaving like me.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s a sacrificial wolf. Then I’ll laugh.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, okay. Sacrificial wolf. I like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but you said you were writing about the subject, Tom. Did you? Is anything coming to mind that you want to bring up?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I published it.

 

I mean, I don’t have to read through the whole thing. People can find it on my Telegram.

 

But, yeah, I just wrote that it, for me, my personal doxing experience felt like progressive overload. So I felt like I was, over the years, developing my worldview. I was expressing that worldview to the people around me. I never hid my worldview or the development of my worldview to the people closest to me, anyone that worked with me, anyone that trained with me, anyone in my family. I wasn’t like a closeted gay. You know what I mean?

 

Joel Davis: Like, you know how there’s a closeted Nazi? Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: I wasn’t a closeted Nazi. You know how there’s closet gays and flamboyant gays? I was always just open with my Nazism.

 

So when I came out as a Nazi, everyone’s like:

 

“Yeah, we knew he was a Nazi!”

 

I was going through my stuff. I was clearing out, and it was a year twelve, my year twelve shirt that everyone signed. When you graduate from school, everyone runs around and writes each other’s names on each other’s shirts. And someone had drew a swastika on my [shirt] arm, and I wasn’t even a Nazi in year twelve. Like, I wasn’t, and yet someone drew a swastika on my arm.

 

So I think that’s pretty to me, I called it honest to a fault. And we often use the term “sperg” in the movement. We say:

 

“Oh, it’s really sperg!”

 

You know:

 

“I was pretty sperg you there, or I said something pretty sperg to you.”

 

It’s like, we used to call it honest to a fault. I was just honest to a fault. I was just too honest for my own good. And I didn’t, like, curtail or control information and manipulate it in some way to the people around me.

 

And then eventually it spirals out of control in this kind of anxiety ridden moment where no one actually knows you’re a Nazi, but you’ve been on the Internet and a Nazi for so long as I never did that, so you should stop doing that if you do it. Like, it’s fucking neurotic. Like, I don’t know. I just think it’s not good. Don’t do it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: To me, that’s very feminine. It’s very weird. Like, if you’re fucking racist, be racist to everyone. I’ve never met anyone that doesn’t know I’m a racist. When I get a coffee or food or whatever, I tell the person I’m a racist. Like, I literally did it today. Like, she asked me to donate a dollar to the charity. And I said:

 

“What charity is it?”

 

And then she said:

 

“Oh, it’s like a youth one.”

 

I was like:

 

“Okay, well, I don’t do the nigger charities. Like, I don’t donate to blacks. I’m a racist.”

 

And she was like:

 

“Oh!”

 

And she, like, took off her glasses. She was like:

 

“What?”

 

And, yeah, it was just a White chick. And she just thought it was fucking hilarious! She was like:

 

“Are you for serious?”

 

I was like:

 

“Yeah, I’m a racist.”

 

I was like:

 

“Don’t spit in my food. I’m watching you.”

 

And, yeah, I just. I fucking. I don’t know. You could call that sperg you out, but it’s just full chat, maxing. It’s just full!

 

Blair Cottrell: You give your real name, like, when you go and you’re waiting for food, when they’re making you give them your real name.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, my full name. I’ll watch you make my food. Like, you’re gonna spin my food or jump the counter, like test me.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, I’ll do it sometimes. Use an alias I have all admitted, because I don’t trust people. And I know that it’s unlikely that someone. Look, I’ve been approached or recognized in public, mostly by people who support me. It’s very rare that someone doesn’t support you and says something or does something about it. Last time that happened, actually, I got charged because I. Yeah, I had to go to court. Some guy followed me. Some guy followed me in a supermarket with a face covering. Threatened me. I pushed him to create space because I thought, you know what am I supposed to do here? And the police charged me with unlawful assault just for pushing a guy who stalked and threatened me in a supermarket. I’ve never seen the guy before.

 

But anyway, I digress.

 

Thomas Sewell: No, it’s not a digression. It’s very important because people are complaining about:

 

“Oh, I don’t want to lose my bank account.”

 

It’s like when you’re real highly active activists and your face and names out there, you’re operating on a different plane of consciousness. You’re not just worried about bank accounts. Like, you have to watch people make.

 

Blair Cottrell: Your food, you have to watch. Have to sit with your back up against the wall. In any restaurant you go to, you need to see the doors. You need to see the entry and the exit.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, it’s on a different, like, people are getting firebombed, you know, at our level, you know, our car tires are getting slashed. Like the government is allowing. You know what I mean? And you’re just a spectator or you’re worried about these minor inconveniences. When you get up on our level, then you can complain. Don’t complain. It’s a bank account. Who cares? Don’t complain.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but I don’t complain because it’s not that fucking bad. We know each other personally. We all just normal guys. And it’s fine. Like, it’s literally prison with the most.

 

Thomas Sewell: Not that I encourage prison, but even prison wasn’t that bad. Like, it sucks, but honestly, it was the whole time.

 

Joel Davis: It would have been pretty good.

 

Thomas Sewell: Isolation is like a luxury. Like, how often in your life do you just get to spend time with yourself and no one else?

 

Joel Davis: I hope I get to do it. Twelve months and I can just read, like, so many books. I’ll just come out.

 

Thomas Sewell: You kind of don’t know who you are until you’ve had a good amount of isolation. That’s why I want to build like a temple or something. I want to build like, a monastery, like when we get land, but, like, real deep in the forest. Like, real deep in the forest up on a mountain or something. Like in the in Batman Begins. I know it’s pipe dreaming ideas, Man, but I’m a dreamer. I’m like Hitler, I’m a dreamer. I laugh. I actually think all the time how our leaders are so gay. Like, they spend 600 fucking million dollars setting up a rugby team and fucking PNG. Or they spend money on fucking Mardi Gras. They just do gay shit! But if, like, Nazis or fascists, whatever you want to call us, I don’t care if we’re in power, think about all the cool shit we’re going to do. Like, we’re going to build like, super monasteries and, like, build like a temple of all this crazy shit! And people are gonna go all the way up to the mountain and it’d be like the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: We should make like an anglicised ninja warrior. Have you seen ninja warrior? I want it. Want to make an Anglo version of that.

 

Joel Davis: We’ll do so much more shit, of course.

 

Blair Cottrell: Who’s the fittest man in this country. Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s just endless. The cool shit that we can do. We can turn it into just the greatest place in the world.

 

And I think part of that is about, is a balance. You want, like athletics and philosophy and you want, you can’t just go too hard in one area. It can’t just be pure hedonism. You have to balance all the enjoyment and all the hedonism with struggle and sacrifice and solitude and things like that so that you have, like a meditative.

 

But you know, they can’t be too, if they’re only meditative, and then no vril, you know, you’ve got to have these kind of outlets, these masculine and adrenaline outlets.

 

And I just think how society, we structure so much differently.

 

But in the meantime, before having that society, I do want to just build something where there’s no technology, just something up on a mountain and there’s no technology. You go there, you know, for a month or three months at a time, and you just get that solitude.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And you’re so right when you said that you never really know yourself until you get that time to yourself and with yourself, or enough of that time to start fully understanding yourself.

 

And I think anyone who’s afraid of that, you’ve got a lot to deal with. You need to unpack your personality. You need to look at the pieces of yourself. You need to pull yourself apart. Look at the pieces. Ask yourself, why do I feel this way about that? Why do I think this way about that person? Is it me who’s the problem? Like, what’s making me tick?

 

And that’s why I always, since I was young, I’ve relished in the opportunity to just spend some time by myself in solitude, so I can think about these things. To get a better understanding of myself, you need to know yourself. It’s so important. I think it’s an Aristotle quote, actually:

 

“That a man should delight in solitude, and only a person who is his worst enemy is afraid of that, his own worst enemy.”

 

Meaning when you’re your own worst enemy, you’re going to try to busy yourself with, you know, social events and talking to as many people as possible, keeping yourself distracted from any introspection. It’s something that I see a lot of people in society doing. I think that’s why so many people busy themselves with so many unnecessary bread and circus, you know, events. That’s if you’re a young guy watching this still developing, getting that time to yourself, the time to think, even if you’re whispering to yourself a little bit, you can talk to yourself in the privacy of your own room, you know, figure yourself out, learn about yourself, because only you can do that. Only you’re going to be able to get that grasp on yourself. And you can’t really appreciate, I think, especially not a woman, until you can appreciate yourself. And to appreciate means to recognize the full worth of something.

 

So really, you’re not in a position to even be searching for a female mate, a partner, as a guy, until you’ve fully understood the man you are or the man that you’re trying to be at least, right?

 

[1:10:23]

 

Joel Davis: I think it’s also important that you take that time to then meditate on the fact that if you’re aware of what is happening to our race and you’re not fucking doing anything about it, and you care more about some stupid job when you can just get another job or being put on some ASIO watch list that won’t materialize into anything because all they’re going to do is just watch you and do nothing.

 

Because, like, unless you, like, start plotting terrorism or something, there’s nothing that you’re doing that’s illegal. You’ll realize:

 

“Hey, wait a second. I’m a fucking faggot. Oh, my God! I’m a piece of shit! What? Why am I doing nothing to save my fucking race? Why am I sitting here working for ZOG, trying to keep my misses happy and keeping up with the Joneses and trying to maintain some shitty middle class existence or strive towards it? Why am I like this?”

 

That’s a fucking shit life! It’s a boring life. How about instead of that, you devote your life to something that’s actually meaningful and then when you’re sitting alone, you can think about what you’re doing with your life and you can think:

 

“Oh, I’m a fucking sick cunt! I love this!”

 

That’s what happens when I sit. When I sit there and I’m just spending time with myself and I’m reflecting upon who I am. That’s how I feel.

 

I feel like a sitcom. I feel like I’m a fucking legend.

 

And ’m going to keep going. I’m on my fucking quest!

 

Blair Cottrell: Hang on a second.

 

Joel Davis: I’m on the hero’s journey!

 

Blair Cottrell: So during your introspective periods, you’re just like, really, like, happy with yourself. You’re never like:

 

“Oh, shit, yeah, maybe I’ve got to work on this?”

 

You’re just like:

 

“No, I’m a sick cunt! I’m always., …”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I’m not saying I’m always right. Obviously, I’m reflective and I’m always striving to make improvements and I’m pretty self critical.

 

But at the same time, like, I’m on a path that I know is the right path and I know my life is full of meaning. I’m not kind of confused. Oh, like am I happy?

 

Yeah, I’m just happy.

 

Blair Cottrell: So I don’t like that question anyway. Like, am I happy? Like, what does that even mean? I’m not thinking about my happiness. The more you centralize your thought process on your own happiness, the more miserable we’re going to be.

 

Joel Davis: That’s what you mean by happiness, though. Like, what I mean by happiness is just, … What I’m doing. What I’m supposed to be doing. Think happiness is like, just, oh, I’m experiencing pleasure. I’m experiencing entertainment and positive stimulation. I don’t view that as happiness, actually.

 

I feel like that’s the opposite. If you get over-saturated, I think with pleasure and entertainment, I think what happens is you actually start to get depressed because.

 

Blair Cottrell: Absolutely! Because you’re less receptive.

 

Joel Davis: Addicted. Yeah, exactly! You become addicted to these, like to this stimulation. And then.

 

And then you just need that stimulation.

 

And then when the stimulation is taken away, you’re like, lost.

 

Blair Cottrell: Um, but if you get too much of good stuff, you get too much pleasure, then no amount of pleasure will be enough. After a certain point, like, look at all these, like, middle class boomers and stuff that live in these beautiful big houses with perfectly maintained lawns and four cars in the garage, all like beautiful European cars. And they’re walking around with a look on their face like they can’t stand themselves or anything around them. They’re all unhappy. They’re all unhappy because they’re always geared so much towards the next material acquisition. They’ve had too much for too long.

 

Like, I can say that losing everything is a really great way to gain perspective as to what’s truly valuable. I think that’s why a lot of people have begun to focus on family ever since the quote, unquote, “pandemic and lockdown” process. Because I think during that process people weren’t able to access the usual dopamine endeavors that would have kept them busy. Typically, they weren’t able to do and acquire the things that they would usually distract themselves. With their bread and circus was somewhat limited.

 

And so they suddenly realized what’s important and what was important to them was family. I’ve noticed a lot more women since the lockdowns, in Australia at least, are geared towards children, having children and putting their children first, which is a positive development for Australia. Obviously, it’s not positive that they all got injected with that mystery goo. That’s not going to be great.

 

But there’s silver linings still. The silver linings in every circumstance, even those lockdowns.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. A lot of women just didn’t go back to work. They realize that that’s actually where they want it to be and I think that’s pretty awesome!

 

Joel Davis: What I like to an extent because I just like read a bunch of books. It’s the same reason why I wouldn’t mind going to jail because my everyday life, work and then training and then this social engagement, that social engagement, see my family, I’m gonna do this is always like shit to do. I can never actually do everything I need to do on any particular week. I just don’t have enough time.

 

And so what the lockdown did was it just kind of like cut so many of those things off and I could, I was just kind of sitting there like, hmm, what do I want to do now? Like, I hadn’t been able to ask myself that question in years and I probably, I don’t think I really asked myself that question in a while and now either. And I guess it’s a good thing.

 

But I think like the deeper point here though is that like, for me, what matters, like my entire worldview, everything. What matters is blood.

 

And that means like Tom had this bit and it’s kind of like an interesting point. It kind of sounds a little weird, but he said the people that you are friends with, in a certain sense, your kind of like mixing your bloodlines because if you spend time together and you raise your children together, the chances that they might end up marrying each other goes up. So then people that you surround yourself with, it’s like a subtle form of like sexual selection, which sounds gay, but, …

 

Thomas Sewell: No, but it is. But you’re selecting your grandchildren, you’re selecting your grandchildren.

 

So when you pick a partner, you’re selecting your children.

 

But when you select a wife. I know everyone hates that term, but I just use it.

 

But when you are selecting your friends and your wife, your friends have selected wives and your wives have selected friends. When that community is being built, you’ve now got even more in-group morality, you’ve got even more in-group loyalty because it’s a true community, because you’re sharing grandchildren with the other people.

 

And so what the jews have done so successfully to our society is they’ve atomized the family into these little nucleuses, this nuclear family.

 

And obviously for most conservatives and most people in the center of politics, they think the nuclear family is the foundation of society and that these gays and trannies are trying to destroy the nuclear family. It’s like the nuclear family is a degeneration of itself. We’re meant to be tribal, we’re meant to be at that higher level, and we’re actually meant to be even bigger than that again. But there are these basic fundamental foundations that they’re destroyed and we need to take them back.

 

Beck said something to me really interestingly today. She said that they’re going so hard, there’s two pronged attack, intergenerational war between the boomers and us. And I bring this up because it’s about the destruction of the family and the destruction of the community. At the moment, there’s going to be the biggest money transfer in the history of Australia between generations, and that’s the boomers are all dying at the moment. They’ve started dying.

 

And over the next 20 years, they’re going to be dying. And that money is all going to go to the founding stock. White Australians at our age.

 

Blair Cottrell: Are you sure? I’m pretty sure. If they had a choice, they’d be buried with their money, man!

 

Thomas Sewell: The business, of course.

 

Of course there’s $3 trillion that they haven’t spent yet. So people are counting down the day of the pillow, but the boomers are counting down the $3 trillion. They’re trying to spend the 3 trillion before they go, and we’re trying to inherit the 3 trillion. I think it’s something I can’t remember. I’m pretty sure it’s something. Some ridiculous amount of money, because it’s basically probably the entire property market outside of a few wealthy Gen-Xs and the fucking property investors like the property development. It’s What’s the property market worth in Australia and what’s the percentage of boomers that own their own homes and how many boomers are there? And you can quantify that it’s probably in the trillions of dollars.

 

Joel Davis: And so you have to wait until you die to get their inheritance. Then you’re a complete failure.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, look, I’m not going there at this stage, ..

 

But because that’s controversial in itself. Well, maybe, yeah. Where I’m going with it is that’s why the jews are promoting hedonism to the boomers. That’s why the tourism industry is such a big, … If you invested in Flight Center when it first came out, you’d be like a millionaire now because that all the cruises, they’re all going on cruises, they’re all going holidays to Greece and this and that and the other, like the boomers, they’re buying, you know, they’re always going to buy assets and stuff, but they’re really, really just dumping the money more than their parents generation of grand parents generation did. They really live in large and they’re dumping the money.

 

And then the two pronged attack is the government’s also looking to tax inheritance as much as possible. Because what the jews really fear is the middle class, the White middle class, in the sense that when you’re working class, when you’re constantly at work and you have to go to work, you don’t have much time to politically mobilize, you don’t have much time to politically agitate, you don’t have much time and energy. You don’t have the spiritual freedom and energy to go after the politician and say:

 

“Hey, hey, hey, hey, mister, you represent me, you work full-time for me. You know, I’m part of the middle class. I’m not like some guy that has to go to work that can’t think about politics. He doesn’t have the energy to think about politics. Oh, just talk to me about the footy. I can’t think about politics.”

 

[1:20:33]

 

But the whole idea of the middle class is that you don’t have to go to work. You go to work because you’ve got a profession and you’re a skill. You’ve got a, you know, everyone’s got a skill, but you’ve got this higher profession. You can go leisurely. That’s why they were called the bourgeoisie. That’s not the upper class, it was the privileged class. You read my calm. Different translation. It doesn’t say the middle class and it doesn’t say the bourgeoisie. It says the privileged class or the leisure class, because you’ve got the time to read books and read the newspaper and you’re not getting rushed, you’re not on a ding ding ding. You’re not on a bell like the working class in the factory or the coal mine. You go to work when you want.

 

Joel Davis: To go to work.

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, do I have appointments? Say, oh, you can cancel my appointments. You don’t need the fucking of money. And the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Sounds like the lifestyle of the average Australian prisoner inside jail.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, that’s the conundrum that kings and all this. But exactly, exactly. Because that’s the other way of achieving it. Becoming a full meat, not having any responsibilities.

 

But the true connoisseur.

 

But what I’m talking about is the jews want to stop our. The millennials and the Gen-X’s. They’re about to inherit $3 trillion. They want to stop us from getting it because it would mean that we pay off our mortgages or would be able to buy a home or would inherit a home, and then we could do what we want. We can. We’re basically on UBI [Universal Basic Income]. We don’t have a fucking debt. We don’t have a mortgage. We’re not paying rent. We just feed ourselves and we can just work leisurely, and then we’ve got time to politically mobilize. The jews don’t want that, so that’s why they’re putting taxes on it. That’s why they’re telling the boomers to dump the money. Dump it. Just dump it! Go on holidays, go on cruises. Buy shit that will degrade in value. Just dump it!

 

Whereas the jews, what are they doing? They’re working until they die and they’re passing on as much money as possible so they can keep building intergenerational wealth.

 

So that’s something that should be considered.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we need to build White leisure. The jews don’t want White leisure. I 100% agree with that.

 

But also bridging from that point, for me, my children, when I die, they would have already got all my shit, basically, because I want them to have it earlier so that they can make more use out of it and already be passing it down, even to my grandchildren before I cock it. Ideally, because that’s what it’s for. Like, that’s what the whole point of making all that excess money is for, is for your bloodline to keep levelling up and ascending and so on.

 

It’s not to go on fucking 45 cruises when you’re 68 or whatever the fuck it is that boomers are doing. It’s not to, like, renovate your kitchen three times and all this frivolous shit that they get up to the amount of boomer renovations, although there’s drop like 40 grand to get, like, fancy toilets and shit!

 

And it’s like, what the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: And then they’re still not happy. They’re still not happy.

 

Joel Davis: The day of the pillar cannot come fast enough. Oh, fuck boomers! I can’t wait till they’re all right. Come on! Come on!

 

Blair Cottrell: We can’t we can’t just. No, no, no!

 

Joel Davis: Yes, we can. No, no.

 

Blair Cottrell: You just spoke to sympathetic grannies at that event last night who loved you.

 

Joel Davis: And they know, and they know. They know that all the other boomers are fucked!

 

Now, we need total boomer death, and it can’t come soon enough because boomers, they had it too good. Everything.

 

Thomas Sewell: No, they honor my ancestors, Joel. You will be smitten down. You’ll be smart and down my ancestors.

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe you’re right. And maybe the reason I’m just from some misplaced sense of morality, maybe you’re actually right.

 

Joel Davis: Next. Ancestors. I got no boomer ancestors, so I got no. I’m free to hate. I’m free to hate now. The boomers created this modern world. This contemporary situation. Like, they partied up and we defeated Hitler. They gave the boomers everything. They lived it up. And now they’re like:

 

“Oh, these kids of today!”

 

Like, it’s because of that it’s literally because of them. So they just need to die and give us their shit because they don’t know what to do with it. They’ve been watching TV their whole life, so their brains are fried with television. So they have no capacity to actually think in the patterns that would be necessary to fix this problem. They can’t adapt.

 

They’re just going to keep voting for the fucking Liberal Party until they die and wasting their money. A hedonistic, self interested generation that accomplished nothing, like the generation before them that, like, won wars and fought in Korea and shit like that, they at least fucking did something to earn the respect. What did the boomer! What? You have to earn respect? What do they actually do? They didn’t do anything of any substance. They just basically gave away. Our entire civilization, had a great time giving it away.

 

And then, you know what boomers always say:

 

“Oh, yeah, well, I’ll be dead by then!”

 

You know how many times I’ve heard them say, I’ve talked to boomers about immigration, about what’s happening? They always say:

 

“But I’ll be dead. Oh, that’s something for you to deal with. I’ll be dead by then!”

 

This country’s going to shit up. I’ve heard this literally a thousand times from boomers across my life, I’ve heard.

 

Blair Cottrell: Doesn’t the thought of the fact that they’re going to be alive doesn’t matter. Code of them.

 

Joel Davis: So that’s why I wish death upon them.

 

Blair Cottrell: Mortgages. You guys heard of reverse mortgages? Jehu Hunt sends $10 and says:

 

“They’re trying to get boomers in the US to get reverse mortgages.”

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, yeah. Yeah. So to refinance their home and die in debt, but they get to spend even more money.

 

Blair Cottrell: And so basically the home doesn’t go to the children. It goes to the bank.

 

Thomas Sewell: So they paid off the home and then. Yeah, so they can use their home as leverage to holiday and live out even more.

 

Joel Davis: They’re already getting pensions bad. Already getting pensions. They’ve got retirement benefits. And the shit that they bought for eight grand. They bought their house, their first house for like, eight grand. Now it’s worth $1.8 million.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, they just pulled themselves up by their bootstraps. My theory, look, my theory, I agree with everything, and I’ve obviously felt the same emotions.

 

Joel Davis: Imagine if you go down.

 

Thomas Sewell: My theory is pretty simple.

 

Joel Davis: Imagine going into the pub, …

 

Thomas Sewell: We are going to get the money. And they’re all your age, when we deserve the money. We’re going to get the money, and not a moment sooner. God wants us to struggle further. I’ve had the exact same thoughts, but we’re just going to keep struggling. We’re just going to keep struggling.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve got to play a little contrarian, though, because I had boomer parents. I still have. Why do I always refer to my parents in the past tense, like they’re still alive? Just ever since they moved into a different state now, I’m always like, my dad was. My dad still is. They worked hard and they did the best they could for me. I believe that they raised, …

 

Joel Davis: They raised Blair cultural, so they get a pass. Like, they generated, like, super Nazi. So they get a pass. They did something good with the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m just. Yeah, thanks for that, because I’m just worried, really. I’m just worried that my dad watching this or something.

 

Joel Davis: Your parents get, obviously, I’m speaking in generalities. It’s like, I speak in generalities, and then people get offended. Like, what? I’m like:

 

“Yeah, obviously some Italians are White. Obviously, obviously some boomers are, …”

 

Okay, but let me speak in generalities. You know what I mean? Let me just. That just get it just vibe, just get it. Okay.

 

But the point is that anyway, no boomers are watching this because they don’t know how to work Rumble. So it’s fine, there’s no boomers watching!

 

But the point of all of this is its really integral that I think our political strategy is geared entirely towards the youth. We’re not going to save the boomers. We’re not going to save old people. Gen-X might be dragged into a new reality by us, but really it’s going to be the millennials that are going to lead the charge in building the new kind of politics and we’re going to have to bring the generations below us in with us. That’s the way in which the movement is going to form.

 

And so that’s what I mean by, forget boomers, they’re dying anyway. And the beautiful thing about it is that no one is going to vote for conservative parties once they’re dead. So conservatism, the senorite will die with the boomers, and there’ll be a new paradigm. There will be far-Left, Mongoloid, mixed race, transgender insanity, and there’ll be us, and we’ll be standing, facing off, and that’ll be 10, 20, 30 years from now. That’ll be what the politics morphs into when the boomers are all dead. And hopefully we have some of the boomer money and some White leisure so that we can win. But that’s basically the situation.

 

So we don’t need to appeal to boomers. We don’t need to be like:

 

“Oh, don’t upset the boomers!”

 

The boomers are not going to help us and they’re going to die anyway.

 

So they’re not going to be part of the solution because we’re not going to have White nationalism next Tuesday. It’s going to take 20, 30 years at least to build this. So and they’ll all be dead by then. So they literally don’t matter.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Well, it’s been a good conversation so far. Generally, we browse through some relevant news topics, news articles.

 

Is there anything you want to bring up, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: There was a few interesting ones, actually. So I saw this just posted by The Noticer just now. It says, Noticer News:

 

“Far left terrorists firebomb and deface jewish MP’s Melbourne office. No arrest made.”

 

[1:30:47]

 

I wonder if these were the same far-Left terrorists that blew up Tim looks his car. It’ll be interesting to watch this story. Like, can the jews get the state to go after these guys in the end anyway? So I’ll read the story:

 

“A jewish MP has been targeted by far-Left terrorists who firebombed his Melbourne office, smashed windows and defaced it with political slogans. But police are yet to arrest the extremists responsible.”

 

You know, to be fair to the police, I mean, they probably don’t know who did it yet. Like, you know, it literally only happened. Okay, maybe they only happened yesterday.

 

Thomas Sewell: Bright pain as when they know.

 

But it’s the same group of people.

 

Joel Davis: It’s the same group.

 

Thomas Sewell: They have a signature like, I’m not a fucking.

 

Blair Cottrell: You don’t have own abomination turns on, you know?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. You don’t have to be a detective. Signature everywhere. They do the red spray paint, it’s. They’ve got a system. They film it.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s four or five when it is.

 

Thomas Sewell: The same, or vehicles they drive, it’s the same people. Like, we’ve built our case against them and the police have more resources than us.

 

Blair Cottrell: So they’re gonna be identified pretty soon, though. Yeah. Well, if it is the same people who have now hit this jewish guy’s office, it was a jewish MP. Is that right, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but to not like to arrest them, they probably need to build a case. So I’m sure.

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m sure Antifa.

 

Joel Davis: I’m saying I’m making the point, though. I think that they will end up going after them because it’s like, it’s the jews. Like they actually got up.

 

Thomas Sewell: The jews, yes. That’s.

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re only going to keep upping the ante until they get caught because they’re demonstrating an escalation in their activity. It’s almost brazen now. It’s almost like, Catch Me If You Can, motherfuckers. Right? So what are they going to do next? Like, is someone going to get burned alive in a building next like that they set on fire? They need to. It’s past time that these people got caught, I suppose.

 

So if anyone has the influence in Australia to find out who these guys are, it’s probably going to be a member of the jewish community that makes it happen. Uh, Australian government doesn’t seem to lift a finger to do anything unless someone from the jewish community is demanding that it’s done.

 

So, yeah, I think they’ve probably targeted the wrong person this time.

 

Thomas Sewell: The Australian government are the whipping boys of the jews. And they’re sick. They love their slavery!

 

Joel Davis: They just got on antivirals doing something actually kind of, yes.

 

Thomas Sewell: It was pretty dumb. It was pretty dumb. That’s a pretty stupid thing to do. Um, yeah, we’re gonna.

 

Joel Davis: I’m not gonna endorse what they did, but I’m not gonna complain about it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I’m not complaining about it either. I’m not gonna interrupt them making mistakes. Fucking idiots!

 

Joel Davis: Uh, well, what else have we got here? Um, most Americans want mass deportations of illegal immigrants, including 67% of Whites poll shows and I think 62% of Americans. So that just shows that we talked about on the show last week that like, the mass deportations was a minority position and now it’s like two thirds of the country want mass deportations of illegal immigrants in America. It shows that deportations are getting more popular. We’re seeing remigration getting more popular in Europe as well.

 

So we’ve got to start normalising these talking points in Australia because the people just haven’t really considered the idea of deportations and sending these people back. People just kind of view immigration in terms of politically. How many more new people are going to come in? And there isn’t even a discussion about removing anyone that’s already here. It’s like once they’re here, they’re just that we’re stuck with them forever, apparently. So changing the terms of the political conversation to say:

 

“Hey, wait a second, actually, we can send these people back!”

 

And the vast majority of non-Whites in Australia don’t actually have Australian citizens. Only a minority of them have citizenship.

 

Blair Cottrell: So what do they have that gives them the right to be here legally?

 

Joel Davis: Like, there’s various different kinds of visas and residencies and some of them are overstaying visas and are here illegally.

 

But yeah, they are on various different kinds of Visa classes and obviously they do naturalize them at a certain rate, but because the majority, because so many of them have come recently and it’s a process, a very large percentage of them don’t have citizenship.

 

So the state can very easily deport and get rid of the ones that don’t have citizenship quite easily. I think, like, if we were to come to power, or a nationalist or populist Right government was to come to power, we should start having a conversation about revoking citizenships that were issued after a certain date. If you can’t trace back your parents to an Australian citizen back one or two generations or something, and then, you know, we would be able to start revoking a lot of these fraudulent citizenships.

 

I mean, that’s the other thing that doesn’t actually make any sense. There are many East Asian countries or Southeast Asian countries that bring in immigrant workers or Middle Eastern countries. They bring in immigrant workers, but they don’t give them, like, citizenship. They just give them a visa, like a rolling working Visa that they can perpetually renew, perhaps, and they can live in the country and work in the country, but they don’t become citizens because the idea is that citizens are like, the actual people who are of this nation, not just some random guy who’s working here.

 

So the pretext for bringing in these migrants is always, well, we need help with this or that economic project. We need workers. Apparently, that’s how it’s always framed. They come here, they work hard, they contribute to the economy. And obviously, we’ve deconstructed those arguments about how that’s bullshit!

 

But at the same time, even if we were to accept it for argument’s sake, why do they need to become citizens for? Why can’t they just work hard?

 

Thomas Sewell: The liberal theory is that they’ll work harder. They’ll be more loyal slaves. They’ll work harder if we give them the piece of paper, if we protect.

 

Joel Davis: Them harder, if we give them all these extra rights to get free shit from us, then they’ll work harder.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, well, it ultimately backfires. Mom takes over. Mom eventually takes over. That’s what happens when feminine men and women are in charge. They become too empathetic.

 

Joel Davis: Another story that I thought was very interesting was I think, what? Have you two shared this actually? Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Direct their empathy in the wrong direction. It’s not actually an increase in empathy. They don’t have an increase in empathy. They’re misdirecting their empathy to the out-group. That’s the correct framing.

 

Joel Davis: So this article here:

 

“Indian Meat Cleaver rapist is cleared of criminal responsibility because he, quote, thought he was in a video game.”

 

Blair Cottrell: I mean, yeah, this is not what it seems, but I’ll let you finish.

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m gonna get some milk. I’ll be back.

 

Joel Davis: It says here Indian man. Yeah:

 

“An Indian man who violently raped a woman while armed with a meat cleaver and a choke chain has been cleared of criminal responsibility on mental health grounds after convincing psychiatrists that he thought he was inside a video game at the time. Katie Bulla Murza, 37, sexually assaulted the woman, 26, after breaking into a random above apartment in Auburn, western Sydney, November 2022, placing a chain around her neck, striking her elbow with the cleaver and slapping her in the face. He carried out the horrendous attack just hours after groping another woman’s breast in Marrickville and a month after indecently touching a woman’s backside in Zetland, his home suburb. District Court Judge Ian Burke found on Tuesday that the acts were proven, but that Mirza was mentally impaired and therefore not criminally responsible. He referred Mercer to the Mental Health Review Tribunal and ordered that he be detained in a secure forensic hospital or mental health facility until facing the tribunal. Judge Burke referred to evidence by psychiatrist Professor David Greenberg. Greenberg, who appeared as a witness for the prosecution and told the court that Merza had told him he thought the rape was part of a game and that his victim was another player who let him do anything he wanted. Professor Greenberg compiled two reports, saying in the first that he was of the opinion that Merza had a mental health impairment in the form of schizophrenia disorder, with co-morbid diagnosis of substance use disorder and PTSD in partial remission. This was partially based on a letter from a psychiatrist Mirza saw in India, doctor Meena Ganak Secharin, who stated that he’d been diagnosed with major depressive disorder with psychosis, abduction, paranoid delusions. He needed, quote, immediate and constant medical care.”

 

If he was in India with all of these mental diseases, how was he getting into Australia anyway?:

 

“He concluded that Mercer did not know that the acts were wrong, but after a request from the Crown to review additional issues, compiled a second report. Quote, in that report, Professor Greenberg confirmed that the accused likely knew the nature and quality of his acts and likely knew the legal wrongfulness of those acts.”

 

“However, he remained firmly of the view that at the time of the alleged offenses, the accused had a mental health impairment which had the effect that he did not know that the acts were wrong. That is, he couldn’t, he could not reason within a moderate degree of sense and composure about the acts as perceived by reasonable people, reasonable people at that time. Judge Burke wrote in his judgment.”

 

What the fuck?

 

Anyway, Professor Greenberg went on to say that in his opinion, yeah, it’s insane!

 

Thomas Sewell: This is like, yeah, it’s completely.

 

Joel Davis: It’s so demented:

 

“Professor Greenberg went on to state that in his opinion, the accused did not know that his acts were morally wrong because of his underlying reasoning, which was likely delusionally based. Professor Greenberg testified that inconsistencies in Merseys accounts of the attacks were, quote, not inconsistent with a man acting on a delusional belief system.”

 

So having a delusional belief system means that you can just fucking rape women apparently:

 

“Doctor Adam Martin, a forensic psychiatrist who appeared for the defence, told the court that Merza told him, The Voices kept telling me that if you do this, you unlock the next stage of the game.”

 

[1:40:52]

 

End quote. The person you’re doing it to, they are part of the game, that they were digital versions, that they were consenting to it. I mean, what a load of I do not believe this for 1 second. That he had voices in his head. How can you prove that any of this is real, by the way? Like, there’s no way to independently verify this. We’re just supposed to just believe. Hey, this rapist is saying that The Voices in his head told him it was a video game, therefore he can just rape who he wants. Oh, let’s just believe him:

 

“Mozilla also told Doctor Martin that he was followed and molested by spiritual entities that became part of his game and that he believed he was being controlled by an a installed on his phone and women had been sexually touching him. Even after his arrest. Doctor Martin concluded the accused would not have understood the wrongfulness of his acts because his capacity to reason with moderate composure was significantly affected by a persecution, a persecutory, delusional system which severely deprived him of the capacity to think rationally and where his ability to think about right and wrong was severely compromised.”

 

In my view, if someone has a persecutory, delusional system that deprives them of the capacity to think rationally in regards to violently breaking in and raping people’s houses and raping them with weapons, then they should just be executed. Like, this is not an excuse for a lack of criminal responsibility, this is just a conclusion that we can determine that he should just die in my.

 

Anyway:

 

“Judge Burke wrote his decision. Having reviewed the evidence of two psychiatrists, I am satisfied on the balance, balance of probabilities that the defence has made out.”

 

I mean, this is insane! I don’t know if I keep scrolling.

 

Blair Cottrell: Through it, but I mean, what he said, he claims to have been molested by spiritual entities. Is that what happens when you get visited, when you’re an Indian and you get visited by your Indian ancestors? Like when you’re someone like us, like your ancestors visit you, they tell you something inspiring or they give you some great knowledge, right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like when your Indian and your ancestors visit you, they molest you.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, Indians molest everything.

 

So even the spirit ancestors are raping.

 

Blair Cottrell: But this isn’t the story.

 

Thomas Sewell: They go, they must rape.

 

Blair Cottrell: They rape like it says clear of criminal responsibility in the title. It’s a little bit sensationalist because what’s actually happened to this guy is he’s received an indefinite commitment to a mental health institution where he’ll be in there longer than he would have been in jail.

 

Basically, he stays in there the rest of his life, or until a board of psychiatrists all agree that he’s well enough to be released, which they probably, or hopefully never will. Unless they’re all Greenbergs and Steins, then maybe they will.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s the problem. It’s that Arkham asylum thing there’s this archetype, this jewish psychiatrist that diagnoses all these. I wonder if it’s the same jewish psychiatrist that diagnosed that nigger as schizophrenic and that’s why he raped all those girls. That was the court case before mine when I went to magistrate’s and he got sentenced to twelve months jail. And the jewish psychologist, I think, was a Greenberg, or something like that, said:

 

“That he has schizophrenia and he didn’t realize that you can’t do that in Australia. And he has delusions and he’s paranoid.”

 

And the judge was like:

 

“Yeah, that’s fair enough.”

 

And then he got released after six months, instead of doing the full twelve month sentence because it was unfair to go given twelve months. He won the appeal at magistrate’s.

 

Blair Cottrell: Wow! It’s a one.

 

But there was a guy, I don’t know, there are a few jewish psychologists of other alternative opinions on the mental health question. I reviewed a book on another stream called The Myth of Mental Illness. It was written by a psychologist named Thomas Zaz, who was jewish and he believed mental illness wasn’t real. He believed they just basically made it up in order to excuse various, you know, vices and so forth. And he was used in a couple of criminal matters where couple of I think it was a murder, or a rape, or maybe both had taken place. And the defendant, or the person who had been charged was trying to argue that they weren’t mentally fit and that’s why it happened.

 

But the prosecution actually summoned this particular jewish character, this Thomas Zaz, to argue that he’s not mentally unwell, he’s completely fine, because mental illness doesn’t exist. I’ve touched on this. The reason I’ve reviewed this book and been interested in it is because I’m of the opinion, as many people know, that most of those mental illnesses are all in your head. And the mental health industry wants people to believe that they have some sort of mind disorder so they can get you hooked on drugs, right? It’s basically that simple.

 

There’s a marketing campaign out there trying to get you to think you’re depressed or bipolar or manic depressive disorder or something else, right? And there’s a pill for everything and your name is going to be on the bottle of pills. It’s going to be your new identity. It’s going to make you feel very special. I’ve touched on this a few times because I feel passionately about it seems like a giant scam that a lot of people fall for, which is, I think what gets my blood up so much.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s.

 

Blair Cottrell: So the point is that. Yeah, yeah.

 

But the point is that there’s psychologists of differing opinions. But I understand that the prevailing, appealing, the prevalent type of psychologist these days is the, yes, mental illness is real. Yes, we need to treat it. And all these people committing these heinous acts are just like completely delusional. I don’t believe that’s the case a lot of the time.

 

And I think the average reader of stories like this doesn’t believe that’s the case. I think it’s common sense that a person would know if they’re like sexually assaulting or killing someone that that is wrong, that they’re committing a crime.

 

Joel Davis: Like, they don’t know that it’s wrong, then we should kill them because that means that they’re just completely like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Look at that guy, look at that guy that stabbed those people in [word unclear].

 

Joel Davis: It’s defective blood. Like, if your constitution as a human being allows you to fall into that state of insanity, you deserve to die.

 

Blair Cottrell: You deserve, let me make this point. Let me make that guy in the supermarket, the guy in Sydney [Westfield, Bondi], the guy recently who was written off as a mental health case, he stabbed those people in a Sydney shopping mall. What area was that again in again? I can’t remember. Yeah, it was in Bondi. Yeah, he was written off as a mental health case.

 

But when you watch the footage, he’s only targeting women or vulnerable people. He’s not targeting men. He’s avoiding men because they pose more of a threat to him.

 

So if he’s like, mentally well enough or stable enough to understand what poses a threat and what doesn’t, then he knows exactly what he’s fucking doing. Like, so it’s bullshit! When they use this mental health thing like, it’s in order to get people off.

 

Joel Davis: Faulty concept. This is a faulty concept of the mind.

 

This idea that this is one part of your mind where decisions get made and this is what you’re responsible for.

 

And then there’s this other part of your mind that you’re not responsible for that can just have its way with you and has all these forces that make it up.

 

Now, I agree that the idea of free will, there’s problems with it. Things are more nuanced. People don’t have absolute full agency over themselves at all times.

 

But we have to hold people responsible for the totality of everything that’s going on inside their psyche and their outward action, because they are all of it. They aren’t just this one part that’s arbitrarily distinguished from this other part that doesn’t actually make any sense. And everything that is in there is because of the genetics. The blood, like, who they fundamentally are, defines the kind of person that they are.

 

So I don’t have any of these weird Indian rape demons inside my brain because I’m not a fucking. I don’t have this, like, demon spawn.

 

Blair Cottrell: Because you’re not Indian.

 

Joel Davis: Like I said on the Elijah Schaffer show, when I did his show last, we were talking about Indian rapists.

 

And I think he told this story about how he went to the servo, and when he was at the servo, he was trying to buy an energy drink or something or some bread or some shit, and he put it on the counter. And the Indian was so he was working by the counter, was so distracted by looking at soft core pornography on his phone that he, like, didn’t even acknowledge the fact that Elijah was trying to buy something. He’s at 7/11 or something, was behind the counter. And I was saying:

 

“Elijah, the reason why that happened is because think about how disgusting and ugly Indian women are the entire Indian genome reproduces itself through the generations by fucking disgusting Indian women. So in order to create a sexuality that will keep wanting to, like, shag Indian women in perpetuity and, like. And pursue them with vigour, imagine how perverse and, like, insane the Indian male sexuality has to be, like, genetically coded for by this, you know, franken genome that is the Indian race.”

 

So, like that explains why Indian men, they’re asking for bobs in Fiji and there’s just such notorious kuma rapey creeps.

 

[1:50:04]

 

Blair Cottrell: Because it was probably looking at what you call soft core porn. He was probably just looking at girls posting photos in their gym outfits to Instagram. That is soft core porn these days. The way girls are dressing in gyms, man. Fuck, don’t get me started on that. Like, that’s, …

 

Joel Davis: It sounds like you’re already started on it. You’ve already started.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d like not to get started cuz I’m getting fucking tired and I’m like almost ready to go. I’ve got to get up early in the morning.

 

Joel Davis: So we’ll do one more story because this story, I think is important to cover. And then it would just rip through the Superchats. This story on the subject of fucking pajeets. Again from The Noticer:

 

“Indian spies infiltrated Australia while our prime ministers covered it up and signed damaging immigration and trade deals. Australia expelled Indian spies who are operating with impunity inside the rapidly growing immigrant community. But successive governments failed to inform the public and instead signed damaging trade and immigration deals with the Indian government. Australia’s intelligence agencies became aware in 2020 that Indian operatives were trying to access sensitive defence technology, breach airport security protocols, and target politicians and a state police force. An investigation by Four Corners has revealed. And even when intelligence chief Mike Burgess, …”

 

A good friend, Mike Burgess, “we call this awful but lawful”. We love you, Mike:

 

“He publicly announced the following year that a, quote, nest of spies from an unnamed country had been confronted and removed. But then prime minister Scott Morrison kept quiet about the country responsible. At least four spies were expelled, some who had been working as diplomats at India’s high commission, which made headlines earlier this year when the country’s former high commissioner, Navdeep Suri Singh, was ordered to pay $97,000 to a former staffer that he make. He made work in, quote, slave like conditions at his Canberra home.”

 

I remember seeing that story. You, like, literally just sigh up.

 

Basically coerced this random chick to be a slave:

 

“Politicians told Four Corners that the number of secret expulsions put India, quote, on par with countries notorious for their intelligence operations, such as China and Russia, while Greens Senator David Shoebridge in India should have been condemned at the time.”

 

Anyway, blah, blah, blah. We’ve obviously covered on the show how there was just. Every time the prime minister would meet with President Modi of India, he would sign a new deal to make it even easier for them to immigrate here and to recognize all of their qualifications and just create trade deals that don’t really benefit us at all and massively disproportionately benefit them.

 

And it’s like, why is this happening? And now we find out there’s this huge Indian spy network.

 

So when we talk about the issues with these foreign races, it isn’t just that they smell bad and look disgusting and they’re irritating. In our daily life, I mean we’re talking about an enemy fifth column that is actively trying to use their diaspora to gain political leverage over our system. And the Chinese are doing it too.

 

And obviously the jews do it. And you know, it’s a national security risk to have all these fucking Indians pouring into the country that India is trying to engage in a kind of soft colonialism of sorts. They’re trying to colonize us, they’re trying to coerce our government. They’re trying to make us their bitch politically. That’s what’s happening. And they have 1.4 billion people and it’s just they’re constantly, you know, breeding and creating more and more of their devil spawns, racial kin. They got, they can replace this country ten times over and not even notice it.

 

So they are trying to shove as many Indians here as they can. And those Indians are going to be politically active. We’re already seeing them get politically active. We’ve seen America as well, the Indian diaspora. I mean there’s an Indian fucking prime minister of Britain right now. Indians have proven themselves to be very effective at using their nepotism and using the way in which they can ascend through the business community and so on to also ascend in politics. And so apparently they’ve got very sophisticated spy networks supporting them now.

 

So this is going to be a massive problem. Like there’s going to be a massive Indian faction that will take over a huge portion of the Labor Party, I would anticipate. And it will just keep growing and growing and eventually Labor Party, if current trends continue, will just become like the Indian Party.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well that’s sad. That’s probably true. You have anything to say on that matter, Tom?

 

Thomas Sewell: No.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, no, it’s getting to the point where like I’m almost ready to sign off but we got a, we got a few Superchats to go through.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: So did you want to make a start on those, Mr Davis?

 

Because I’ve got all the ones from Rumble saved here.

 

Joel Davis: You got the one guys? I’ll go through a couple. I got one here from Alt Cuperian who said:

 

“Unable to listen right now but wanted to make sure this got to you boys.”

 

Appreciate the support by the way. Some people have been complaining that the Rumble stream they had some issues with Rumble. I don’t know. It seems like it works for most people, but some people have issues. We are broadcasting on Odysee and Cozy TV, so if you have any issues with one of those sites while watching live, just maybe try one of the other ones. Gustavus Vasa said:

 

“Thanks, guys, for sticking to the true and radical message that will wake up our people. The bigger you get, the more our enemies and fools will try to steer you away to a harmless path.”

 

Blair Cottrell: We got $50 from JK Richardson 85. Thanks very much. Sends us a salute from VT, USA. Where’s VT?

 

Thomas Sewell: Vermont.

 

Blair Cottrell: What state is that? Yeah, Vermont. Yeah, there is a Vermont state. Yeah. Well, thanks very much for that. I’ve got a few more saved. You know, I’ve had to screenshot them because Rumble doesn’t really like the screenshot. The Superchats kind of disappear after a while and then I can’t find them. But I have screenshotted all the Superchats. Did you read this out from RSI Liberty? $25:

 

“Great to see you guys supporting eight other Right-wing groups. No infighting or petty territory.”

 

Yeah. Okay.

 

Joel Davis: 65 Stoney said as well:

 

“Is owning a home after bank shutdown still possible? Also, do they take your kids off you or anything like that?”

 

Obviously owning a home is still possible. Why would getting a bank account close, if anything, to do with whether you can own a home or not and take your kids off you? I have known of some people. I don’t want to name any names, but I’ve known of some people who have been nationalist activists, prominent, publicly facing activists that are well known quantities, labeled neo-Nazis by the media, that have been in a custody dispute, where obviously they’re no longer with the mother of the child, who is basically trying to screw them and take custody off them. And they’ve been able to use that in court, as you know, as part of their case or whatever, for keeping the kid away from the father.

 

So that’s pretty fucked up! So you could see it maybe in that sense, but not child services coming in and just taking a kid off, like a couple just because they’re a Nazi. I’ve never heard of that happening in Australia. Have you ever heard of that happening before? Tom?

 

Thomas Sewell: They have threatened it to the wives of the political prisoners in the UK. So not from Taola, but I have been contacted from a couple of the wives in the UK of the guys that got locked up and framed, and they haven’t had their kids taken off them, but their version of ASIO, I think, MI5, or maybe this, that’s their aces.

 

But whatever their Home Affairs, internal political police force is, have come to the homes while the husbands are in jail and said that if you, one of them was threatened, that if she tries to home-school the kid, that they’re going to take the kid off her, that they’re going to start legal action against her, that she’s grooming the kid for terrorism, and they’re using the same laws, of course, that they used against the ISIS brides on these women. So that the UK is about five years ahead of us.

 

So I would expect. I haven’t heard of it ever happening, but I have heard of the threats. So we could expect them to start making those threats in the next five years here in Australia. And I’ve made it very clear to ASIO and I’ve made it very clear to the general public, that’s when I become a terrorist. That’s when I’m going to start killing people. That’s just a fact. That’s not a threat. If you take my child off me, I’m going to start killing people and I’m going to encourage every single person that I know to also start killing people that are responsible, starting with probably the police and the judges that ordered for a child to come off one of us.

 

So if it happens through some dirty domestic dispute or something like that, it’s different. If you’re a junkie and you’re associated with the movement, you get your [children] taken of you, that’s different.

 

But if you’re just a lawful, honest man or you’ve gone to jail for some irrelevant reason, like you’ve been attacked in a park and you defended yourself and they go to take your kid off you. Nah, we had journalists. Who’s that tall jew, Ranger? Not Nick McKenzie. There’s another one. What’s his name? But he threatened to take Tim’s kid off him when the legacy dox happened. And yeah, that’s line that you don’t cross.

 

Blair Cottrell: How does a journalist threaten to take someone’s child away, he said.

 

[1:59:53]

 

Thomas Sewell: So he wrote in the dox of Tim and Tim’s gym, he wrote:

 

“That there’s a ten year old pictured in some of these community photos.”

 

Well, they don’t say “community”, they say “extremist photos”. And that something along the lines of that child protection has been notified of this and that perhaps child protection should look into investigating the this sort of abuse. So he didn’t threaten, but what he did was he encouraged, which is, to me, the same thing, to encourage other parts of the system to put that rhetoric out there and encourage other parts of the system to kidnap children from our community.

 

That’s the fucking line in the sand, and everyone needs to fucking know that is the fucking line in the sand! And I’m deadly serious. Fucking test us! You know, let’s do this peacefully. But touch fucking children. Touch our kids. It’s over! Like, it’s over! That’s the whole reason why we’re doing this, for our children. We want a future for our kids. We want a White Australia for our children so they have a home to live in the future.

 

So that’s it. That’s the line in the sand.

 

Joel Davis: And that’s also another thing to bring up on this subject.

 

So it’s so important to pick the right woman to have kids with. If you’re gonna take the path of being a nationalist activist, you need a woman that’s not gonna use that against you, screw you over down the line. And that’s also why you shouldn’t cheat on on your woman, period. But why? It would be really fucking stupid if you cheat on your wife, on our path and give her a reason to take revenge against you, because the state is not going to take your side anyway, even just as a normie, because of how skewed it is against men.

 

But then you drop like:

 

“Oh, he’s a neo-Nazi!”

 

In the court on you. Like, good luck. You’re not going to get much joy.

 

So, yeah, don’t fuck that up! That’s really important. Don’t fuck that up! There’s another Superchat here from Fellow Comrade who said:

 

“This is a $5 down payment for a nationalist ninja warriors course pilot episode.”

 

He’s gonna cost a bit more than $5 to make this show, man. But he says:

 

“You can battle Drew Pavlou and humiliate him on live TV.”

 

Well, I don’t think Drew wants that smoke. I don’t think he wants to fight me.

 

Blair Cottrell: So it’s unfortunate, but I think Drew would probably humiliate himself just by being on live TV. Like yeah, I don’t think you’d hide. I don’t know the guy. I shouldn’t say too much about him. I don’t know the guy that he just didn’t didn’t impress me in the Joel Davis debate. Not at all!

 

Joel Davis: No, no. He’s not an impressive person. Laura Tawny 777 said:

 

“Greetings from the US.”

 

I don’t know if I can read. This is in Minecraft. In Minecraft, shooting endorsements just, hey, they paid $5. I read it out. That’s it!

 

It’s always something is reading something out. J Who Hunt said:

 

“They’re trying to get boomers in the US to get reverse mortgages. It’s fucked!”

 

Maybe said:

 

“That when we’re talking about the boomerang.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I brought that one out when we’re talking about that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah.

 

So that was the credit to him. Uh, I think that way. I’m still scrolling through here. What? I hate how Rumble doesn’t put all the Superchats at the top the whole time.

 

Blair Cottrell: They just stay like, go away. If I knew you were saving them, I wouldn’t have done it as well. I thought I had.

 

Joel Davis: I’m not saving. I’m literally just scrolling through it. I’m just scrolling through it. Smarty 98 said:

 

“Christ is king scrolling here.”

 

And oh, yeah, we already had the guy throwing a Roman from Vermont, JK Richardson.

 

So I think that’s basically all the Superchats. Oh, no, wait, there’s someone, Odysee, Dirty White Boy said:

 

“Really curious about your takes on this. If a White power American, in brackets Anglo Saxon, came to Australia on the work Visa and did construction or something for a season and participated in activism, would you be pro-or against that, by the way? You guys are so incredibly lucid. It’s a treat when you stream.”

 

All right. For me, I would be. I would support it. Any White, any Whiteman who wants to come here and hang out with us and be part of the community who shares our beliefs I see no problem with that whatsoever! I mean, you don’t necessarily.

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you think when he says we’re extremely lucid? What does that mean? Lucid?

 

Joel Davis: Lucid. Lucid is like just aware and, like.

 

Thomas Sewell: Clear in the flow. We’re in the flow.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, that’s why they call it lucid dreaming, because you’re aware that you’re dreaming. Right. I get it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Yeah.

 

Anyway, what do you think about internationals, international Whites who are over here? Can they hang out with us? Can they be part?

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, it’s happened many times before. Yeah. Usually we get emails or they’ll message the contact part. We get messages all the time.

 

There was one recently, I think was from two Italian guys, and they were like:

 

“We’re backpacking Australia. We’re part of fascist network in Italy. Can we come train with you guys? We’re just out in the country at the moment, but when we’re back in Melbourne or Sydney, like, we want to train with you guys.”

 

So, yeah, we have international contacts all the time. Want to see how our scene is going, just like when our members go overseas. Some of the boys that got back from different European trips recently, they. Some of them hung out with Golden Dawn or whatever the organization is called now, because I think it’s illegal. And they met up with CasaPound, and one of the guys met up with some Spanish group.

 

I can’t remember what it was called, but one of the other guys just got back from Finland, and he hung out with the Finnish. Finnish active club or active club Finland.

 

So, yeah, yeah. Always, always solidarity.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

And also, if you want to. If you’re a Whiteman and you want to move here, I mean, we’d like to have some, like, White immigrants. We’re gonna have immigrants more than welcome. Dirty White boy also said:

 

“I fucking love this monastery idea. I’ve been visiting some, and it’s perfect. Self sustaining, beautiful, peaceful, amazing! I’ve had this idea for years.”

 

Well, why don’t you come over here and build one, then? You want to come hang out? I get Americans all the time. They say:

 

“Oh, Joel, we love you. We love Tom. We love Blair. Only we had people like you in America.”

 

There’s a lot of great people in America, so it’s nice of you to say that, but.

 

But if you really feel that way, then why don’t you just move to Australia? Just, if you’re a Whiteman, just move to Australia. Or a White woman. We got plenty of single guys in the for you to date. Come join the team. Why not?

 

But, yeah, I think. Oh, wait, I got one on Entropy from Govlover, who said:

 

“Thanks for fighting for the White race. You three are my heroes. We need more like you in Canada.”

 

So thanks. Kind words.

 

But, yeah, that’s all the Superchats, so they were pretty fucking boring Superchats.

 

To be honest. It seems like no one actually listens to me when I say:

 

“Can you try to send something interesting?”

 

They just want to say, like:

 

“Oh, you know, we really appreciate you guys. We love., …”

 

That’s nice and all, but it’s really boring. Like, just say something else like preacher.

 

Blair Cottrell: I appreciate it. Right. I like. Your words are lost on me, guys. That’s why you don’t need the stroke and come on!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I don’t need any.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Anyway I’m egregiously tired, so.

 

And I’ve got to get up early.

 

Now I’m going to be in Queensland for the next few days. Uh, I’m busy on the Saturday. I’m helping a mate who bought a property up there around Gold Coast region. But on Sunday, I’ll be training with the boys. I don’t know if anyone watching this is from Queensland, but I think anyone who is anyone will already be aware that I’m going to be in the gym, at a gym just south of Brisbane on Sunday.

 

But if you do want to send me a direct message. You want to get involved, you want to join us for a workout. It’s going to be a big crew of us doing that, so feel free to send me a direct message on Telegram. It’s just at my full name without any spaces or anything. Blair Cottrell. And, yeah, we’ll hook you up. I’m looking forward to it. It’s an excuse to get some sunshine. It’s been cold down here in Melbourne. I like the cold, but I still want sun. The ideal weather for me, I don’t know about you guys, is just good sunshine, but without the heat, just with that nice crisp breeze. Yeah, I agree.

 

All right, lads, well, it’s been a good show and thanks, everyone, for tuning in. We’ve had high engagement, as usual. It’s great to see comments have been interesting. I sometimes am tempted to sort of tune in on this. On this chat and drop my own two cent in there.

 

But, yeah, I really appreciate you guys and I suppose we’ll see you all next week.

 

Joel Davis: There’s one more Superchat, actually, so I’ll just read it out from Fellow Comrade. He said:

 

“Wikipedia says Damien called for the de-racinafication of Australia last year. What’s that that about?”

 

I think what he would have said is that the globalists or the elite are deracinating Australia because Damien, he likes that word, deracination, but he doesn’t mean it. He’s saying that it’s a negative thing, not that it’s a positive thing. So, yeah, I think he just misread that.

 

But, yeah, anyway, yeah, yeah, another shitty Superchat. Thanks but no thanks.

 

Anyway, we’ll, yeah, we’ll see you guys next week.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, what’s funny?

 

Joel Davis: He used to send, at least he’s not sending me Superchats about the last time he farted, he had a running joke. He, like, fart Superchats.

 

Blair Cottrell: But, you know what makes it even funnier, man? Makes it even funnier because Joel sets these shows up and he hosts them. He’s the only one that benefits from the Superchats, but he’s complaining about them at the same time! Like, all the Superchats go to Joel, and then he’s complaining about them, and I’m appreciating them. It’s like, I don’t know. It’s funny. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: It’s part of it. Look, it’s part of the, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I won’t psychoanalyse it. I’ll keep out of it.

 

Joel Davis: It’s part of the show! Like, if you want someone who’s gonna, like, suck you off, go Superchat them!

 

Blair Cottrell: Vulgar isn’t it? This is what we deal with, …

 

Joel Davis: I’m going to suck you up for any amount of money! See you later.

 

Thomas Sewell: Good night.

 

Blair Cottrell: All right.

 

[2:11:27]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/22/2024 = 279)

ChainReaction
1 day ago
ngl, i appreciate Joel’s brutal dead pan humour

8
0
Secure the future of our people
1 day ago
Follow Joel on twitter and Blair, Tom on (telegram)

Tweets by joeldavisx

https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell

https://t.me/realblaircottrell

3
0

@BMC1488
1 day ago
Total boomer death except Granniewaffen!

2
0
WaffleStake
1 day ago

@ChainReaction
Wellerman

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
o/

2
0
Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Happy Solstice. JoelBlairTomLove Love to all you Beautifuls MWAH

2
0

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
And I’m northern european stock.

2
0

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
90s and muggy here just the way I like it.

2
0
WaffleStake
1 day ago
Brisbane is great in Winter

1
0
Secure the future of our people
1 day ago
1488

2
0
Hide replies

@SmutVendetta
18 hours ago
I went to the DMV and my number was I488 but it looked like 1488. My total for my shopping today was 14.88. The old Gods are with me!

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
Boomers aren’t the problem, they grew up reading newspaper, listening to radio, watching TV. No wonder they are fucked up!

2
2
Hide replies

@SmutVendetta
18 hours ago(edited)
There were plenty of warnings that jews should not be allowed to own the media. They chose to ignore these. I don’t blame boomers (why blame the victim? and fight with our elders), I blame jews the parasitic agitators.

3
0
Show reply
My Awesome Channel
13 hours ago
Joel dislikes those who fund his chanell
Let that sink in.
Joel you fkn retard.
You don’t like donations for fck sake!

0
1

@SmutVendetta
17 hours ago
Guys, keep in mind it’s great you have a bank account you can pay your bills and buy things online because of it but it is foolish not to learn from the 2009 banking crisis there will be a bank run and thanks to fractional reserve banking you need to especially get ahead of it. DO NOT KEEP YOUR MONEY IN THE FKN BANK!

1
0
GRITCULT
1 day ago
Joel complains about getting super chats complimenting him lol. Must be nice.

1
0
MajesticCasual
1 day ago
Looks like this was the flyer for the event and Damiens website. I’m still searching out the speeches but have to get back to work.

National Workers Alliance – Rowville VIC

1
0
WaffleStake
1 day ago
Jester maxxing

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
I may have said that in jest

1
0

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
You give me the money bitch!

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
Best chat is the jester chat

1
0
Secure the future of our people
1 day ago
repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1803734045387350259

1
0
Secure the future of our people
1 day ago
o/

1
0
ChainReaction
1 day ago
don’t get Blair started on the heat…

1
0
Dirty White Boy
1 day ago
I travel a lot to europe. needed a good reason to come to australia. im a builder

1
0
DOLO
1 day ago
Cheers for the stream fellas. o/

1
0

@Aus1788
1 day ago
Gold coast winters are great

1
0
ChainReaction
1 day ago
Heil lads n chyat o/ o/ o/

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@Randbot
quitting drinking and having you guys on a stream when? (rhetorical)

1
0
(((The tribe)))Aliver
1 day ago
no slack joel

1
0
Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Flipping heck, Joel, don’t encourage anyone.

1
0

@Aus1788
1 day ago

@dirtywhiteboy
\0 Come over brother

1
0

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
*here

1
0

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
We’re having a heatwave hear in PA and I’ve been thinking of returning to a desert climate.

1
0
Dirty White Boy
1 day ago
yeah. boarding a plane so the stream cut out right when they started reading

1
0
Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Good to hear.

1
0
Lon Awfully
1 day ago
that’s awesome

1
0

@Aus1788
1 day ago

@Dirty
white boy still around ?

1
0
Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Drew is forgettable. He’ll get fatter & die early, poor bloke.

1
0
WaffleStake
1 day ago
lol Blair did the “And I’m not going to read that” JFG bit

1
0
WaffleStake
1 day ago

@Aus1788
at the very least the kids would be subjected to liberal indoctrination

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
^^^^^^^^^^^^

1
0
ChainReaction
1 day ago
^^^^^^^^^^^

1
0

@Aus1788
1 day ago
kids get abused in government custody.. Are they not giving little baby boys to homosexuals now?

1
0
Dawn Browning
1 day ago
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

1
0
ChainReaction
1 day ago
in Soviet Revolution i fought over free speech, start taking our kids? oof…

1
0

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
If they try to take my neighbors kid I’m willing to go to the mattresses.

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@ChainReaction
They certainly keep dropping kindling. Which has me concerned too, they would have planned for it.

1
0
ChainReaction
1 day ago
YES, there are lines crossed that mean it’s go time

1
0

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
Seems fair enough Thomas.

1
0
Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Fearful for Sam & Laura. WE MUST DEFINITELY COLLECTIVISE

1
0
scoobyburn
1 day ago
the moment a sticker becomes a threat

1
0

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
Vermont has the Green Mountains. It’s beautiful and full of Whites who know not of the spoils of diversity. They have the luxury of naivete.

1
0

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
A little hyperbole here and there isn’t bad, but yes the situation is very dire. very very dire. If I’m generous on the positive side about 50% of the people I see when I go into town are white.

1
0
Hide replies

@SmutVendetta
18 hours ago
Yep. Even in my small town I see non stop shit skin garbage. Every damn day. I used to see one once every few months a decade ago. We can take it back, but we cannot rest on our laurels.

Hide replies

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
18 hours ago
Dude please stop replying to the live stream comments, you’re taking them out of context

@Ronnie
1 day ago
It’s a way of pathologizing White people (and selling them the cure)

1
0
WaffleStake
1 day ago
i had a thought bubble the other day about the great reset idea. Did the wef deliberately shit up the idea to make the concept unpalletable? After all, wasn’t the NSDAP takeover effectively a great reset

0
1
WaffleStake
1 day ago
they should try some drops

1
1
ChainReaction
1 day ago

@colnolan
1 day ago
no 304s tho

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
Lucid is Awake and Fluid

@Aus1788
1 day ago

@SammichLubber
sounds about right

Secure the future of our people
1 day ago
ollow Joel on twitter and Blair, Tom on (telegram)

Tweets by joeldavisx

https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell

https://t.me/realblaircottrell

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@ChainReaction
I tried telling The Woodlander, but he wouldn’t hear it.

ChainReaction
1 day ago
^

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
Beware what changes they’ve made in the law around home ownership.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
The problem of “freehold”

WaffleStake
1 day ago
true story

WaffleStake
1 day ago
Vermont= Green mountain

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
Vermont

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@WaffleStake
He’s my favourite BarsKeeper. I go into a trance on the 128’s.

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@ChainReaction
Scary thought

WaffleStake
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
And uhhh The Holocaust is big business….

Secure the future of our people
1 day ago
repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1803734045387350259

ChainReaction
1 day ago
indians have discovered Aryan woodworking tools, in a few millennia they’ll be a real threat

@Aus1788
1 day ago
Australia is the perfect target

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@WaffleStake
I love The Ayatollah. He has THE BEST intro since Iconoclast

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
India is like 1.4 billion dumb jews.

scoobyburn
1 day ago
bread like rabbits

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
LOL Tom lost

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
lol

WaffleStake
1 day ago
The Ayatollah’s imitation of JFG

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
Part of their training is garlic free for 6 months

@Aus1788
1 day ago
keeping secrets will be impossible

@Aus1788
1 day ago
The west will loss the next war just due to inner espionage ..

WaffleStake
1 day ago
Time for superchats….and I’m not going to read that

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
WTF how is that even possible???????? “Indian spies” – surely you could smell them?

Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Blair’s Missus in a hijab ASAP

scoobyburn
1 day ago
star link into the Amazon & they all start jacking off

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
It’s
8:30
am.

@Ronnie
1 day ago
lol

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
Wait isn’t it environment that causes behaviour – surely it’s just the turmeric that has them shitting on the beach? :laughing:

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
They breed like sewer rats.

@Aus1788
1 day ago
I see the relation between aboriginals and indians

ChainReaction
1 day ago
Bengal monitor lizard raped in Maharashtra, 4 arrested…
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/bengal-monitor-lizard-raped-maharashtra-3-held-sahydari-tiger-reserve-1937027-2022-04-13

Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Traumatic genetic memory studies are interesting.

@Ronnie
1 day ago
Jeets are complete coomers

WaffleStake
1 day ago
penetiatires is a Christian concept, before they existed, execution was the preferred method of punishment

@Ronnie
1 day ago
“Oppositional Defiant Disorder” is a natural response to anti-White propaganda. It’s a way of corralling and controlling White boys in particular

WaffleStake
1 day ago
it’s a Weimar condition

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
I believe in merciful legal executions of the criminally insane.

scoobyburn
1 day ago
psychology an industry of death, genetic failure more like

@Aus1788
1 day ago
dont they giver you the same medication for anxietyas depression ?

ChainReaction
1 day ago
Tom Cruise n Scientology called it decades ago… …now there’s a sentence u don’t read every day…

ChainReaction
1 day ago
and that’s how Victor Szas became a Batman villain…

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
flipping heck. So low %?

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
I’m in Pennsylvania and we’ve had a major influx of Indians. They’re like creepier browner jews and they come in numbers.

@Aus1788
1 day ago
Jews are sympathetic to schizophrenia as it’s their most common diagnosis

scoobyburn
1 day ago
2.5 million have entered & vaccination status is unknown, so what was the last 4 years about,,,, pure bloods

@NullDigger
1 day ago
show bobs saar

Rebbe Schneerson
1 day ago
LMFAO

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@Aus1788
Aye. IDGAF anymore

@NullDigger
1 day ago
LMFAO

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@Aus1788
Mine too, this is why when I go to the supermarket I only see one other white out of 200 people.

Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Rumble hit 500 btw

@Aus1788
1 day ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
My area is 99% white

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@Aus1788
LOL

@Aus1788
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
funy your just filming right in their faces. Ah thought you were in Nz

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
Only White men have free will and agency.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@Aus1788
That is reality. I’ve said this for decades: In an insane world, it is the sane who appear to be the insane

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@Aus1788
The @ video was at Costco, Moorabbin. Mass diversity in that region.

@Aus1788
1 day ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
that is insane

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
I am not surprised by that at all

Secure the future of our people
1 day ago
Follow Joel on twitter and Blair, Tom on (telegram)

Tweets by joeldavisx

https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell

https://t.me/realblaircottrell

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
They come down on any goycattle that misbehaves at the end of the day. This is necessary; A farmer can herd 100 cattle 10 times his own weight, but this is an illusion, should one of them demonstrate he can be trampled at anytime, watch out.

WaffleStake
1 day ago
always has. Ancient Greece invented the steam engine but never used it

Forza
1 day ago
The Golem always turns on it’s creator.

WaffleStake
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
cheap slave labor inhibits the rollout of labor saving technology

DOLO
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
oy vey!

Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Whatcha doing Rabbi?

Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Their changings opinions matter, Joel.

WaffleStake
1 day ago
boomers are the most racist cohort in Australia though

Rebbe Schneerson
1 day ago
The future is RW AF. Faggots are genetic dead ends.

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
I had to remove that from YouTube

@SammichLubber
1 day ago
Parasites are going enslave Whites as long as we allow it. We must give them NOTHING!

Forza
1 day ago
A whip makes them work harder too

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@Aus1788

@DawnBrowning
did a great video on this

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@WaffleStake
100% mass remigration is easy.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@Aus1788
Don’t believe those stats, they make the same lies here in NZ but I just have to look outside to see that is a lie

WaffleStake
1 day ago
60 years ago, one million French lived in Algeria. They all went back to France. So remigration is possible

@Aus1788
1 day ago
So Australia is over 80% white?

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@WaffleStake
Aye, I know. We’d have gotten to the moon by now if it wasn’t for cheap labour.

@Aus1788
1 day ago
the worse things get the better the solution looks

@Aus1788
1 day ago
so civil war

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@WaffleStake
Who will make my lattè

WaffleStake
1 day ago
further enriching non Australians

WaffleStake
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
meanwhile employing foreign labour at those facilities

ChainReaction
1 day ago
LOL

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
YES!

@Aus1788
1 day ago
Obviously some jews are.. Naaa

ChainReaction
1 day ago
Dark Blair Rising

Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Retirement Villages = Bleed Them Dry B4 They Die

WaffleStake
1 day ago
William Luther Pierce was a boomer

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
A common thing here boomer do in NZ is sell the family home, the holiday home and buy a camper van. They live in that before being put in a home leaving their children with nothing.

Secure the future of our people
1 day ago
repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1803734045387350259

ChainReaction
1 day ago
yup, BlackRock, StateStreet etc wants all the land so u can live in zee pods n eat zee bugs

DOLO
1 day ago
lol

WaffleStake
1 day ago
reverse mortgages literally blood from a stony

Dawn Browning
1 day ago
My mum had 2 cruises booked in 2020. Now her home is in trust for her descendants thanks to the cough. NOT ALL. SHOW SOME FKN RESPECT JOEL, darling

@Aus1788
1 day ago
should be an automatic death sentence for those words

@Aus1788
1 day ago
Stopping television was one huge step towards the Right direction

ChainReaction
1 day ago
that genuinely depressed me Bruv

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
gave them

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
My ancestors built 3 houses and gave them all to the jews

ChainReaction
1 day ago
Joel is coming, HIDE UR GILFS, lads!..

WaffleStake
1 day ago
Fuck your small boomers

DOLO
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
lol

scoobyburn
1 day ago
to avoid death tax make sure assets are placed in the hands of kin before departing

Dawn Browning
1 day ago
JOEL!

ChainReaction
1 day ago

@Aus1788
nah i gave up on that, when someone clearly insane and/or dishonest, i just block without a word or acknowledgement n move on, is par for the course

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
The issue lies in not the bourgeoisie class, they are the creators, the producers they create the world around us, the very reason they are under attack. The real issue is the goycattle farmer class.

@Aus1788
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
happy days to you

WaffleStake
1 day ago
also consider how superannuation is pitched. Build up wealth until you’re 65, then whittle it away until you die

@Aus1788
1 day ago

@ChainReaction
I never block people either so they know they can keep going with me until thye reach some variety of satisfaction

WaffleStake
1 day ago
Who remembers the Equity Mate Commonwealth bank ada from the early 2000s? This encouraged the boomers to piss away their accumulated wealth

ChainReaction
1 day ago

@Aus1788
yeah u might be right, a bit of mental illness too i reckon, a lot of ppl brain-broken after all the crap, is sad rly

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@Aus1788
Does my head in. Ah well. GTSY

@Aus1788
1 day ago

@ChainReaction
Found a comment of truth I said somewhere and haven’t learned to let go.. Bad actors is my guess

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
Eat, Bake, Sing did a lovely live from UK earlier.

ChainReaction
1 day ago

@Aus1788
it’s weird when u don’t even stream n u have rabid haters, only thing i can think is some ppl envy those of us who garner respect just by being ourselves n getting known?

@NullDigger
1 day ago
Boomers: Hold my reverse mortgage xD

@Aus1788
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
probably trying to reply to me at one point… Happens all the time to me

@Aus1788
1 day ago

@ChainReaction
The troll towards me is pretty hilarious! Quite nights are preferred though

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@Aus1788
I had to unblock you. Flip knows when I blocked you.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
*resolution

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
Solstice 8am NZ time, 6am Sydney. I should make a new years revolution to stream every day come rain snow or shine.

Secure the future of our people
1 day ago
repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1803734045387350259

ChainReaction
1 day ago
hahahahaaaaa, gotta appreciate the loon-free days…

@Aus1788

Anglo-Saxon
1 day ago
was a good jew reveal too

@Aus1788
1 day ago

@ChainReaction
slow night

Anglo-Saxon
1 day ago
lockdown was great for reading

Secure the future of our people
1 day ago
Follow Joel on twitter and Blair, Tom on (telegram)

Tweets by joeldavisx

https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell

https://t.me/realblaircottrell

ChainReaction
1 day ago
ur fan club not here today? lol o/

@Aus1788

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
LOL

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
Yes! What has real value? Numbers in a computer somewhere? Or your family?

@Aus1788
1 day ago

@ChainReaction
\0

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
I’d be upset if the jam was left on the Phillips

ChainReaction
1 day ago
nah but it’s true, a man who has no justified pride in himself is no man at all

Gretchen
1 day ago
we must all strive for badass level of operating o/

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
who put jam on the handle of the butter knife

ChainReaction
1 day ago
Joel is Joel’s number 1 fan lel

Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Big head Joel

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
When I went from living with people to living alone for the first time for a period in my 20’s, I was hit with an awful clarity. That a lot of the things I was complaining about others doing, I did myself. Who left this cupboard open, why hasn’t the vacuum cleaning been done…

Dirty White Boy
1 day ago
hey chat are the hyperchats going through? they disappeared for me

@Aus1788
1 day ago
fuk ye

@NullDigger
1 day ago
The problem is you really can’t get another job xD

@Aus1788
1 day ago
< highly recommended @Crazy_Cat_Gentleman 1 day ago @DawnBrowning Oneday Dawn Browning 1 day ago @Crazy_Cat_Gentleman Do more electronic vids. I’ve learnt heaps from you. Maybe do 101 basics? @BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob 1 day ago o/ ChainReaction 1 day ago the yng men i council i always advise to just take time to reflect n figure out what they actually stand for, where are their lines etc Dirty White Boy 1 day ago $5.00 I fuckin love this monastery idea. I’ve been visiting some and its perfect. Self-sustaining. beautiful. peaceful. amazing. I had this idea for years. Vettekid1488 1 day ago I’ve always loved nature and felt at home In it ..we lived on a small farm when I was about 7 ….used to love to walk the wooded area adjacent to our house … fun to follow animal tracks in the snow Dirty White Boy 1 day ago $25.00 Really curious about your takes on this. If a white power American (anglo saxon) came to Australia on the work visa and did construction or something for a season, and participated in activism, would you be pro or against that? Btw you guys are so incredibly lucid. Its a treat when you stream. Dawn Browning 1 day ago Tom was groomed @Crazy_Cat_Gentleman 1 day ago Was that someone a jew? Forza 1 day ago @ChainReaction I agree, the rage is real and justified. And I think once we reached a tipping point of getting people on side, then the whole truth can come out and we can throw romans and have as many swazis as we want. Secure the future of our people 1 day ago Repost and like the Twitter if you can please! https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1803734045387350259 Dawn Browning 1 day ago A lot of Tradies work for companies who have govt contracts ChainReaction 1 day ago @Forza.Blankito totally get ur point n have been hearing n seeing that myself, i was just born into NatSoc so hard for me to let go of the injustice n the fact we held the torch to this day – but yes, the goal n SUCCEEDING is utmost to me also Forza 1 day ago @ChainReaction What is needed is a total re-branding, there is too much stigma still associated with the past. As much as I love Uncle A that whole thing is holding us back. So much so I think it’s pushed by some exactly for that reason. @Aus1788 1 day ago Orwell got shot by a fascist for being a dirty commie Dawn Browning 1 day ago We were raised on Orwellian 1984. Being incarcerated / asylumed / Gulaged is still in our genetic memory? Vettekid1488 1 day ago @ChainReaction sweet ChainReaction 1 day ago good news is ppl would faint hearing abt NatSoc 30yrs ago, now even normies listen, so that’s a clear win in my eyes ChainReaction 1 day ago some people can do way more as an anon, yeah for many it’s an excuse, but for some it’s a valid strategy, some of us have been doing this for decades all over the world, wouldn’t have been possible without being anon – my 5c ChainReaction 1 day ago nobody has the top quality women that our movement has, this is undeniable n one would think it would give normies pause Dawn Browning 1 day ago Us grannies plant the seeds. Literally & figuratively. Gretchen 1 day ago we love our boys o/ Anglo-Saxon 1 day ago gigga nannas Forza 1 day ago based granny’s can be sent in my direction Forza 1 day ago G’day Aussies! ChainReaction 1 day ago @Adult_White_Female nanana, very good musings, at least i appreciated ur points Forza 1 day ago Crusader Quest>Ninja Warrior

ChainReaction
1 day ago
a man may dream

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
That’s true, you don’t know yourself until you live alone.

Secure the future of our people
1 day ago
Repost and like the Twitter if you can please!
https://x.com/joeldavisx/status/1803734045387350259

Vettekid1488
1 day ago
hahahha I do that too …when I needed a physician I phoned their office and asked the race of the doctor and staff and said I won’t be using their services I’m racist towards non whites

ChainReaction
1 day ago
i get joy from everyone meeting me being weirded out that i’m a NatSoc n then slowly understanding over time what i’m saying – takes time n rational behaviour, but always happens

Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Tom @ Starbucks…. frothy coffee

@lewpers
1 day ago
It is becoming clear that enough people are red pilled and know enough about what’s going on. The emphasis needs to be growing a real life presence now.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
You get asked to donate to “Rainbow Youth” here in NZ, take a wild guess what that is….. My response is usually store banning level.

ChainReaction
1 day ago

@Forza.Blankito
oh heck yeah mate, i’m a big proponent of gaining critical mass before ppl can larp, i’m no fan of loons throwing Roman’s just as a spectacle or waving the Hakenkreuz – to me that’s not just counterproductive, but disrespectful, 100%

Dawn Browning
1 day ago
AngloLuv?

Adult White Female – WPW
1 day ago

@ChainReaction
ty. super busy so a bit slow with those as of late but trying to post relevants

Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Evening

@Adult_White_Female

ChainReaction
1 day ago
great recent posts o/

@Adult_White_Female

Anglo-Saxon
1 day ago
o/

Adult White Female – WPW
1 day ago
Great WP Mornin’ all! :white_heart: /

ChainReaction
1 day ago
ladies n gentlemen, the enemy:
https://www.gtvflyers.com/

ChainReaction
1 day ago
dissident movements sadly attract wackos, narcissists etc

ChainReaction
1 day ago
trying something GOOD <– that being the operating word

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@WaffleStake
Aye. Many things have happened since. It’s different for each individual.

Ethno Nationalist
1 day ago
o/

M88
1 day ago
\o

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@katana17
Thank you. A few people I follow still start with “what did you have for dinner”

@katana17
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
[Horus Live – European Freedom – A Tribute to Simon Harris – May 26, 2020 — Transcript]

Horus Live – European Freedom – A Tribute to Simon Harris – May 26, 2020 — Transcript

WaffleStake
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
kind of but he died at the beginning of COVID, which seems like a while ago now

ChainReaction
1 day ago
…with his tea and rum…

WaffleStake
1 day ago
should sing Wellerman on stream

ChainReaction
1 day ago
HIT LIKE & SHARE
More

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@katana17
Simon Harris’ passing still seems like yesterday

@katana17
1 day ago

@DawnBrowning
Thanks Dawn.

@katana17
1 day ago
[Red Ice TV – Nationalism for White People & Activist Persecution in Australia – Joel Davis & Thomas Sewell – Jun 15, 2024 – Transcript]

Red Ice TV – Nationalism for White People & Activist Persecution in Australia – Joel Davis & Thomas Sewell – Jun 15, 2024 – Transcript

Dawn Browning
1 day ago

@katana17
Katana

@katana17
1 day ago
[Slightly Offensive – Is America (& the West) Over? – Guest – Joel Davis – May 31, 2024 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – The Vibe Has Shifted and the Paradigm is Shifting – Jun 13, 2024 – Transcript

@Aus1788
1 day ago

@AngryRetroGamer
correct

@AngryRetroGamer
1 day ago
Mussolini failed epically in Greece, leading Germany to divert valuable resources from the eastern front.

Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Rumble says there’s 443 watching.

@katana17
1 day ago
Last week’s show transcript: [Joel Davis – The Vibe Has Shifted and the Paradigm is Shifting – Jun 13, 2024 – Transcript]

Joel Davis – The Vibe Has Shifted and the Paradigm is Shifting – Jun 13, 2024 – Transcript

DOLO
1 day ago
In his speeches he used to hold one hand in the air with a closed fist, and have one hand on his hip. Chad

@Aus1788
1 day ago
mussolini guy had a jewish mistress

@NullDigger
1 day ago
o/

DOLO
1 day ago
o/

Anglo-Saxon
1 day ago
o/

joeldavis
1 day ago
o/

Archipelago Woes
1 day ago
o/ from USA

0
0

==========================

See Also

top