Joel Davis: Okay, we are live. It is Anzac Day, eve, 24th of April, 2024 [2025]. And a stream for you this evening, a regular Thursday night stream. But we’re going to talk a bit about history tonight. We’re going to talk a bit about the history of our great nation, because that’s what we should all be thinking about and preparing ourselves to be focusing upon tomorrow morning when all of you, all of you better be getting up early, before the crack of dawn and getting down to a Dawn Service, whether it be in the city, whether it be your local Dawn Service! One day a year to get out of bed early and get down there and remember and venerate our fallen ancestors who paid the ultimate sacrifice to secure this continent for the White men! Let their sacrifice not be in vain. But it starts with venerating the ancestors in the here and now, if we’re ever going to ensure that. But we’re going to get into that.

 

But first, my esteemed colleague, Blair Cottrell. He’s looking a bit like a rock star from the early 90s. I just hope that he hasn’t gone on heroin or something. He’s looking a little bit heroin chic. I mean, not skinny heroin chic, but the sunglasses on at night, so it’s a good look though, it’s fresh!

 

Blair Cottrell: I wouldn’t usually do this, but a couple of days ago I noticed my eye was irritated. Didn’t think much of it. Then it got worse and then it got worse. And now it looks like this. See that? [take sunnies off] I saw a doctor and apparently it’s some sort of cellulitis of the skin in the eyelid, which is a relatively serious infection. I don’t know how I got it. I don’t remember being bitten by anything. Maybe I just got unlucky somehow.

 

So taking antibiotics, unfortunately. I don’t like to take antibiotics, but there’s some circumstances where it’s necessary to take antibiotics. I know that I’ve had deep tissue infections on a couple of occasions. Really, if not for modern medicine, I would probably be dead because an infection would have got me by now. And I was told that an infection like this, if gone untreated, can actually cause permanent blindness. So thank God that modern medicine exists. Not everything about modernity is bad, I guess. But I’ll be wearing the sunglasses for the rest of the stream because it just looks terrible. I’m not really confident about being on camera with an eye like that, so you’ll have to enjoy the Sunnies, guys. I’m not on cocaine! I haven’t spiralled out of control. Still here. I’m still me.

 

Joel Davis: That was a nice cope story, but, I mean, we all know that Blair’s missus packs a punch. And you know, when you talk back, you better watch out!

 

So we’re feeling for you, Blair, and just remember that you can get help. There is a domestic violence hotline.

 

Blair Cottrell: Not for man! There’s no help for men, bro! Everyone knows it. Even the lawyers know it. You go into court for a domestic violence dispute and you’re a man, you have no rights! [chuckling] Everyone knows that. So why lie?

 

Come on, let’s be honest here!

 

Joel Davis: Anyways, so I guess let’s get into the show. I’m going to try and do this show in a streamlined fashion this evening because we’ve got to get up early in the morning to get down to the Dawn Service. Which I reiterate, if you don’t get up early tomorrow morning and go down to the Dawn Services – this is for the Australians in the audience – and I think in New Zealand, do Anzac Day in New Zealand the same as us? [It’s the same day] I presume that they do.

 

Blair Cottrell: Almost certainly! It stands for Australian, New Zealand Army Corps, so almost certainly they would do it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I presume that they do. I don’t know if they have a different day. I don’t know enough. Maybe if you’re a Kiwi, maybe you could let us know what you do over there.

 

But if you’re an Aussie, you better be out of bed 5am and you better be down at that Dawn Service! Because think about what they did for us and all you have to do is get out of bed early one day a year. It’s really not that much to ask.

 

But yeah, I want to talk about history tonight and I want to talk about what the Anzacs actually fought for. Because there’s a lot of misrepresentation that occurs at this time of year.

 

On Australia Day, the enemy is willing to openly admit that this country was founded by the White man for the White man and condemn it as such, and go on about colonialism and the poor abos and blah, blah, blah, as we’re all familiar with. But on Anzac Day, they take a different approach, tack. Because they know if they were going to on the sacrifices of the ancestors at wartime that that wouldn’t go down with the population. We are not that demoralised. You know, they’re barely, they can’t even really cancel Australia Day effectively. We talked about that on Australia Day, how Australia Day is having a resurgence in popularity precisely because of the attacks being levelled by our political enemies upon that day.

 

But on Anzac Day, they try to subvert it. They try to present the Anzacs:

 

“They fought for multiculturalism, they fought for against fascism and communism, for freedom. And all this kind of stuff.”

 

But it’s bullshit! It’s bullshit! If you know anything about history, it’s bullshit!

 

And what the Anzacs fought for in World War I, because it’s only really proper to talk about the Anzacs in the First World War, because in the other World Wars we were fighting more as Australia, or in World War II we were fighting as Australians, and in Korea and Vietnam and so on, we were fighting as Australians. But in World War I they were fighting for a White Australia, and in World War II they were fighting for a White Australia. And these are really the decisive wars that everyone is really thinking about.

 

[06:10]

 

And even in these wars against Korea and Vietnam, against communism, they were fighting to preserve a White Australia. We still had the White Australia Policy, and they were trying to put up a defence against the spread of communism in our region.

 

So the men that died in these wars, whether you agree with the overarching politics of these wars, which obviously there’s a lot to discuss in that regard, that’s what they were fighting for! And they said it explicitly. And when it comes to World War I and World War II, the Prime Minister himself said it explicitly! Billy Hughes, our Prime Minister in the First World War, when he addressed the nation and he was basically asking people to sign up to go and fight, he said:

 

“I bid thee, go and fight for White Australia in France!”

 

He didn’t say:

 

“Go fight for Australia in France!”

 

He didn’t say:

 

“Go fight for the British Empire in France!”

 

He said:

 

“Go and fight for White Australia in France!”

 

And that might seem maybe a little bit strange to people. What could he possibly mean by that? Why was White Australia up for, threatened by events in Europe? And there’s a long version of the story, but I’ll start with the shorter version. The basic version is this.

 

Australia at that time, obviously a very young country, but only been federated in 1901. About three years after we federated, the British Empire entered into an alliance with the Japanese. And the Japanese were an emerging power in the Asian region. They started building up a big navy. And the British, which at the time had the best navy in the world, and the best shipbuilders in the world, were actually helping the Japanese to build up their navy. As part of this alliance, the British saw fit to make an alliance with Japan because that would then basically take some of the pressure off them trying to command the seas of East Asia if they were allied with the pre-eminent Asian power. And there was a lot of competition at that time for control in East Asia. The Germans were trying to get established here. You had the French, I’m talking about East Asia or the East in general. The French and other European powers were involved, and the British wanted to maintain dominance.

 

So there was an alliance with Japan. It was widely criticised, but it was ultimately in Australia because of the basically the fear that it would force us to cuck on the White Australia Policy. Because the Japanese did not appreciate the White Australia Policy. They said:

 

“How dare you lump us in with blacks and Indians and these lesser races. We are Japanese, we’re a proud race, we shouldn’t be excluded from immigration to Australia on the account of being an inferior race.”

 

And the response at the time, actually by Deakin, who was a founding father of our country and Prime Minister, second Prime Minister of Australia, was to say that:

 

“Oh, we don’t want you here precisely because we respect you as a race, precisely because we think if we were to let you in, you could take over.”

 

But anyway, we obviously secured the White Australia Policy, but the British made us kind of tone it down basically not to offend the sensibilities of the Japanese. And so there was a resentment on that basis and a fear of Japanese expansion.

 

And then in 1905, the Japanese did what at that time was unthinkable. They defeated a European power in a war. They went to war with Russia and they defeated Russia in 1905! And that shocked the world. It was the first time a non-White country had defeated a White country in a war in all of modern history. And so that sent shockwaves through the world that, well, perhaps the White man won’t just be able to rule the world carte blanche with no resistance.

 

So this struck fear into the hearts of Australians in general because the idea was, well, the Japanese turns expansionist power. A few years later, they conquered Korea. Fears increased.

 

Now, of course, the British Empire had a formal alliance with Japan. But they said:

 

“Well, what happens if the British Empire collapses? Or what happens if that alliance collapses and instead the Japanese ally with the Germans and then they come together to defeat the British Empire, then what will happen to Australia?”

 

The fear was that if the British Empire was to lose its dominance in the region, that we would ultimately fall under the control of these powers and then potentially non-Whites would be able to enter our continent, and the White Australia Policy would collapse.

 

And so all the rhetoric and all of the political machinations at that time was building a defence force in Australia that could defend Australia, but also propping up the British Empire because Australia had such a small population so that the British Empire could defend Australia and therefore defend a White Australia. Because if we were to fall under the control of some other empire, they could force us to open our borders and bring in their merchants and bring in their workers and so on and we would lose the continent to other races, literally. And this was explicitly, I’m not just saying this is what all the newspapers were saying. This is what all the politicians were saying. This was our primary concern politically in this country at the beginning of our history.

 

And there were a lot of elements in Australian politics, particularly in the Labor Party at the time, who were upset at the British Empire, who thought that the British Empire, you know, was basically taken over by jews, bankers and so on. They didn’t give a fuck about Australia. That they had this kind of multiracial, international corporate empire that was ruled by not the almighty dollar at that time, because it wasn’t the dollar but the almighty pound. And that they weren’t concerned about the racial future of Australia. But nevertheless they recognised that because we were of the British race, we were part of the British Empire, that it was our best bet at securing our position in the world.

 

[12:13]

 

 

And so they were willing to go – I mean, Billy Hughes was Labor, he was a Labor man – they were willing to go and fight for the British Empire to ensure they won the First World War, to ensure that the British Empire remained strong, to ensure that it continued dominating East Asia, to ensure that we could continue having a White Australia Policy. That’s why we got involved in World War I. It wasn’t just because of some kind of like British patriotism or loyalty to the Empire. It was a pragmatic decision to secure a White Australia.

 

Of course, people felt good feelings towards the British Empire. We were of the British race, of the British stock. But there was also a strong sense of nationalism in Australia all the way back at that time, a keen sense of what was in our interest as a people.

 

And so that was what was determined that we have to go and fight to secure the future of the British Empire and also to win the Right by participating in that war to have a say about the direction of the Empire. And what Billy Hughes did at The Treaty of Versailles at the end of World War I and the during the establishment of the League of Nations, is he pushed very hard against members of the alliance, such as the Japanese and others who wanted to push for, … League of Nations, by the way, was the prototype of the UN. It was the first attempt at creating a UN. And there was a proposal put forward by the Allies that won World War I to establish this prototype of the UN called the League of Nations, to basically establish a principle that racially discriminatory immigration policies would be abolished basically in the world. That this was horrible and racist and so on all the way back then. And Billy Hughes pushed very hard against that. He said:

 

“We came in, we had 65,000 men sacrifice their lives to ensure this victory. We are not giving up our White Australia Policy.”

 

And we successfully won. We convinced the Americans sided with us, the British sided with us and ultimately that provision was taken out. The Japs weren’t happy about it, but they didn’t have enough sway. So Billy Hughes came back to Australia announcing victory:

 

“What a great victory that we’d achieved!”

 

And also New Guinea, today known as Papua New Guinea, was under German control. And this caused a lot of concerns back in those days. We also secured that under our control at that time.

 

So the idea was not simply about defending the British Empire because we loved the King. And we were Anglo Saxons or something. It was a specific concern with Australian national interests and how to secure this continent for the White man. And everyone knew it! And when the soldiers came back and they formed what became known as the RSL, which is the largest body by far to represent veterans that have fought for Australia and fought for the Empire. They came back to Australia, they set up the RSL [Returned and Services League (of Australia)] and immediately became the strongest lobby group in an already very racist country for the White Australia Policy. With the first president, second president, third president of the RSL and so on, making constant statements that their members fought and died or fought and sacrificed because their members obviously were still alive and their comrades who died for a White Australia to secure basically Anglo supremacy in the world, and to secure this continent for the White man. That’s why they fought. And that any kind of acquiescence on the White Australia Policy they would consider a betrayal. And they reaffirmed this after World War II.

 

And in fact, the RSL was the last major public organisation in Australia to abandon explicit advocacy for the White Australia Policy. It wasn’t until the late 80s, the late 1980s, long after the White Australia Policy was abandoned by the government that the RSL finally abandoned its advocacy for the White Australia Policy.

 

So if you see Anzac Day ceremonies tomorrow, they try to tell you that:

 

“They fought for multiculturalism and against Nazism!”

 

They did fight against the Germans, they did fight against the National Socialists. And they were misguided, you could say, ultimately, and putting their allegiance to the Empire, because the Empire in the Second World War ultimately betrayed us and it collapsed. It betrayed itself and collapsed.

 

But that’s why they fought. That’s what their sacrifice was about. Every single man on that battlefield, that’s what he was fighting for. That’s why he went to France, that’s why he went to Gallipoli, that’s why he went to Kokoda*. So that needs to be held in full consciousness and ruminated upon.

 

[* The Kokoda Track campaign or Kokoda Trail campaign was part of the Pacific War of World War II. The campaign consisted of a series of battles fought between July and November 1942 in what was then the Australian Territory of Papua. It was primarily a land battle, between the Japanese South Seas Detachment under Major General Tomitarō Horii and Australian and Papuan land forces under command of New Guinea Force. The Japanese objective was to seize Port Moresby by an overland advance from the north coast, following the Kokoda Track over the mountains of the Owen Stanley Range, as part of a strategy to isolate Australia from the United States. Wikipedia]

 

[16:53]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you think it’s reasonable to assume that every fighting soldier was conscientiously engaging in the war? That whatever it is, they were fighting in World War I, World War II, because they were fighting for White Australia? Every Australian soldier actually was fully aware and conscious of their ethnicity and they were fighting to defend their ethnicity? Or would you say that maybe war propaganda plays a part in the reason for why they’re fighting? They might have been spelled by some series of slogans produced by the government. They might have been made to hate the enemy. They might be in it for glory, for honour. They might just be in it because they’re bored and they want to do something with their lives that’s interesting. I think there’s probably a complex of reasons. I understand what you’re saying. I understand that the Statesmen who were in favour of the war, they obviously had their reasons, which were nationalistic in essence. But I think the individual soldier, he fought for his own reasons a lot of the time.

 

However, it’s my understanding, or it’s my feeling rather, that there was a collective, how should I describe it? Some sort of collective understanding that was unspoken, that the Australians understood that they were a specific ethnic group, that they were a certain type of people, an extension of the British colonies, but still their own kind nonetheless, and that they were fighting to defend their kind, they were engaged in the war for that purpose, collectively.

 

Yet on an individual level, if you were to interview each soldier, if that was possible, for argument’s sake, I’m sure they would give a series of explanations as to why they were fighting.

 

But I think the collective reason why they were fighting would have been in for the maintenance or expansion of their own ethnic presence, power, that kind of thing, defending their own kind I think. What do you reckon?

 

Joel Davis: Well at the end of the day though, like these politicians that were talking about these ideas, they were elected, they were running on these ideas. They were saying:

 

“We must defend a White Australia. This is what we need to do to prepare to fight and defend it.”

 

And they were voted into government, you know, according to those statements they were making to the public.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s funny, isn’t it?

 

Joel Davis: Australians were not forced, Australians were not forced to go and fight. They were not forced. There wasn’t conscription in World War I. They signed up voluntarily to go.

 

Blair Cottrell: What I was saying is, isn’t it curious that the phrase “White Australia” right now would be something that a lot of people wouldn’t be comfortable using in regular conversation because they’ll be accused of racism or something worse. But less than 100 years ago maybe even 50 or 60 years ago, that phrase was just commonly used and understood as an obviously present and correct thing. Like everybody understood that White Australia existed. White Australia was a real cultural, ethnic identity and it was who we are. It’s who we are as a people. In such a short time people are now have been, or people have been made to feel uncomfortable and frightened to even use that phrase. It doesn’t take very long, does it with effective propaganda to turn a people against themselves? To make them too afraid to establish any right to exist, too afraid to fight for their own self-determination.

 

Joel Davis: That phrase White Australia was the central animating concept of federation. It was the central animating concept of World War I. It was a central animating concept of the first half of this federated nation’s existence, in politics. The White Australia Policy was the policy of the government that was most in concern for the people and for the politicians! It was the defining principle of our country. It wasn’t just an idea, it wasn’t just something that people liked or sometimes talked about. It was an obsession!

 

And those men gave their blood. They died for that ideal. Ultimately that was what it was explained to them that the war was about. In all of the, all of the media publications. All these publications that we still know today, like the Sydney Morning Herald and the Melbourne Age and all these things, they used to be virulently White nationalist racist publications. They used to be! They used to talk, like The Noticer today has tamer language than what the Sydney Morning Herald had in like 1910. That’s just the reality and that’s how the culture was in those days.

 

And the so-called Anzac Myth. People talk about that, how there was a the soldiers were described rather poetically by journalists and other writers in the Australian press during and after the First World War. That ANZAC myth was fundamentally racist. It was describing the Australian soldiers essentially as great eugenic specimens, talking about how they were the superior Anglo Saxon and like, comparing them as a stock to the British in favourable terms and so on, and describing how on the battlefield they showed our racial fortitude was superior to the enemy and this kind of thing.

 

And when Australian politicians were justifying certain policies, like policies to make military training compulsory nationally and things like that, they would come to the people and say:

 

“If you are a proud White man, how could you oppose my policy?”

 

You know, they would literally appeal to you on the basis of White nationalism, on the basis of your, like, Aryan honour to justify their policies to you. That’s how politicians used to talk to the people in those days.

 

[22:49]

 

So when you read Australian history, you realise this country was more racist than like even probably any country in the world at that time. And there was this pressing concern. I just posted on my Telegram this quote from Prime Minister Billy Hughes. He was our wartime Prime Minister in the First World War. And Billy Hughes, by the way, was a full on Darwinist, basically. He had a dog-eat-dog, highly racial, like a kind of view of history as racial competition. You either fight for your survival and assert your supremacy or you get crushed by other races. That’s how he saw the world. It was very Hitlerian, proto-Hitlerian, you could say. And in some, in some ways you could say Billy Hughes was more savage than Hitler in some of his statements and speeches on this, on these issues.

 

But this is a quote from Billy Hughes. This is during a ceremony that was conducted in 1913, a year before the beginning of World War I, when they started building Canberra. Because at the beginning of Australia, Canberra wasn’t built yet. At the beginning of Federation, there was a dispute between Sydney and Melbourne as to who got to be the capital.

 

And so the compromise was struck to build the capital city in Canberra for the purpose of serving as the nation’s capital, to kind of assuage this conflict between the two major cities, right? And Billy Hughes said this at this, at the ceremony where the foundational stone of Canberra was being laid. When they started building Canberra, to quote:

 

“We are here so far as we can to mould the destinies of a nation. The deity has fashioned us out for this purpose from the beginning. We were destined to have our own way from the beginning and America, two nations that have always had their way, for they killed everybody to get it. I declare to you that in no other way shall we be able to come to our own except by preparing to hold that which we have. Now, we are here as visible signs of a continent. We have a great future before us. The people are incapable of nourishing abstract ideals. They must have a symbol. And here we have a symbol of nationality. The first historic event in the history of the Commonwealth we are engaged in today without the slightest trace of that race we have banished from the face of the earth (meaning the Aboriginals). We must not be too proud, lest we should too in time disappear.”

 

This is how the leader of our country thought before World War I. You know, tomorrow if they do a Welcome to Country, that wasn’t what they fought for. The man who led us, who led the Anzacs into the First World War, said:

 

“I bid thee go fight for White Australia in France. We have banished the Aboriginals from the face of the earth. Let us struggle so that we are not banished like them.”

 

That was how this man thought. That’s how this man spoke and addressed our nation. That was the man that we elected to rule us, to run us during that war. And who was celebrated as a hero, a national hero at the time.

 

So that’s what we need to have consciousness of around this. Like this is not up for debate. Like it is black and white. The Anzacs fought for a White Australia!

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you ever believe in racial equality at any point in your life?

 

Joel Davis: I think when I was young, growing up, I did kind of have a default egalitarianism of sorts where I thought:

 

“Okay, well, you know, fairness would dictate that every people deserve a certain dignity or whatever.”

 

But I did, as I started to get into my teens, I did become conscious of the fact that there were relations of supremacy and superiority. And I did remember feeling pride from basically the first time I thought about it, in the fact that my race was clearly such a powerful and strong race in world history and in contemporary history that we were all kind of top of the food chain or it felt like we were top of the food chain. And I did also remember becoming conscious of the jews around that time because there was a lot of discussion of Israel and so on we’re talking about this is during like the Iraq war and zionism. And I kind of became vaguely familiar of like conspiracy theories around the Rothschild banking family and so on.

 

And I remember thinking:

 

“Okay, well that kind of puts the whole Holocaust thing in perspective. Like they said that Hitler was trying to take over the world and the guy, the guys he decided to take on were the jews. And apparently these jews run all these banks. And now we’re our whole like global superpowers are fighting to defend their country, Israel. What is that all about?”

 

And so that did make me kind of start to see, … I remember feeling like, okay, maybe that would justify, like I didn’t at that time I didn’t realise the Holocaust was fake, but I started to think:

 

“Okay, maybe that would kind of justify doing something like that if you felt like that was your main competitor for supremacy.”

 

But these were kind of vague thoughts. Like it took me multiple years to kind of formulate them more ideologically because the conditioning is very strong in our culture to think in terms of egalitarianism and that like supremacy is in a certain sense immoral.

 

I just kind of thought about it at that time more as like a kind of, from a realist, pragmatic standpoint, maybe there are necessary evils that you can sympathise with. And you know, in my late teens I became familiar with like Nietzsche’s philosophy and so on and started thinking about things more in those terms. But it probably wasn’t until I was 19 or so that I really fully internalised that as a worldview and came to that like ultimate kind of conclusion of thinking about the world in terms of that like kind of inequality is just nature and it’s just reality. And that either you’re the top of the chain or you eat shit! And it’s much better to be top of the chain than to be eating shit!

 

[29:01]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: I remember I used to get angry at people for being racist, like in primary school and early high school days.

 

And I thought that was a good thing for me to do because I was standing up for what was right, what was fair. Because as you said, the conditioning was strong. That’s what I had been conditioned to believe was right. But I started to see the obvious realities of racial differences and even genetic differences between people of the same race. And I realised that people aren’t equal. I realised that pretty quickly.

 

But one thing that always, because I went through, so I’m just getting a message from someone. I went through a stage where I actually felt like White people didn’t have culture. I felt like only dark skinned people were cultured. And White people just didn’t really have anything like that. Because I wasn’t thinking about what culture was. I didn’t have a good understanding of culture. To me, culture meant music and family values and doing things together as a family and painting your face and having all of these kind of spiritual, greater meanings to family traditions and shit like that!

 

I didn’t see culture as great stone structures. I didn’t see the kind of culture produced by the race to whom I belonged. And I can recall, I always was curious about the Nazis, because whenever I saw footage of the Nazis, the Germans, on History Channel, I heard how crazy and evil they were, yet so many people followed them! And they looked so polished, they look so good!

 

And so the explanation didn’t really match the aesthetic that was being presented to me on these channels. So I was always curious to learn more about the Nazis. But whenever I tried to, there wasn’t really a lot of information there. It was just like, these guys are evil, these guys are crazy! Especially if you tried to get your information from Hollywood entertainment you weren’t really getting much there.

 

Joel Davis: Well, let’s talk about World War II, actually, because obviously on Anzac Day, we don’t just venerate people from the First World War, but also the Second World War. And I think that’s important because people say:

 

“Well, you know, Joel, you’re a National Socialist, you’re obviously sympathetic towards the Germans, yet you’re venerating men who fought many of them against Germans, a lot of them against the Japanese, who were German allies in the Second World War. And ultimately you think the Second World War was a horrible thing, the way that it went and that the Germans lost and so on.”

 

And that requires an explanation, perhaps, and we’ve talked about it before, but I think on a day like this, it’s important to discuss this.

 

Number one, recall what I was saying about World War I. The animating concern of the First World War for Australians was the Japanese. And the Japanese weren’t even our enemy during World War I. They were our ally. But we saw that the Japanese would expand and become an increasingly powerful force in the world. And that was why we chose to ally ourselves with the British. Well, we were already in the British Empire, but why we chose to commit so intensely to the British Empire to the point that we sent 65,000 of our own sons to go and die for the Empire in the First World War, in the beaches of Turkey and in the trenches of France.

 

And the Second World War vindicated these fears. Right? Because what was the Second World War? Well, the Second World War, it started in Europe, in 1939, but arguably it started in Asia in 1933 when the Japanese invaded China. And the Japanese were rampaging their way through China, through the 1930s. And this was setting off massive alarm bells in Australia. And ultimately, of course, the Japanese ended up forging an alliance with the Germans.

 

And so this very much factored into our enthusiasm to fight in the Second World War, our concern that if, well, if the British Empire was defeated in the Second World War, which ultimately it was, we can get on to that, but it was defeated by the Germans in the Second World War, that basically we would be left defenceless against this radically expansionary Japanese Empire that was allied with what would have been the German victors. That concern is what inspired men to fight.

 

And ultimately, from a bird’s eye view, it was incorrect for us to fight against the Germans. The betrayal happened really in London. The British should never have gone to war with the Germans. The Germans wanted an alliance with the British. And then even after the war began, they also wanted to make peace with Britain and were rejected many, many times.

 

And that ultimately was destructive to the British Empire. The ultimate victors of World War II was not Britain. On paper, it was Britain, but it wasn’t. On paper it says that they won, but look at the practicalities of what happened. The British Empire fell apart immediately after World War II at the hands of the Americans and the Soviets, their so-called allies, during World War II. During World War II, the Americans extended massive loans to the British which they made them repay in full. They extended massive loans to the Soviet Union, their supposed communist enemy in the Cold War. They didn’t make them repay, they didn’t make them pay back one cent in order to fight the Germans.

 

There was an intent by the Americans to use the conditions of World War II and kind of World War I as well, actually, to an extent, but in particular World War II, to basically bankrupt and break up the British Empire and then integrate its remnants into an American led, liberal, democratic international order.

 

Now moving over to the Pacific, the Japanese were a real threat. They did want to take over our region. I don’t think they wanted to invade Australia directly, but they did attack us. They did bomb Darwin, they did send [mini] submarines into Sydney, they did invade Papua New Guinea, or New Guinea, which was actually our protectorate. So they did attack us. And they also attacked the British Empire and Australian soldiers in Singapore and other places.

 

[35:27]

 

 

So what World War II was primarily for Australians was a race war against Japan to ensure the dominance of the White race over the Asia Pacific region. And ultimately our main ally, and that was the Americans, was the British Empire didn’t have the capacity to defend us. They basically abandoned us in World War II. And we kind of abandoned them largely earlier on in the war. In the early years of the war we went and fought the Germans and the Italians in North Africa on behalf of the British Empire.

 

But then once the war with Japan kind of began, we pulled our guys out, we said:

 

“No, we need to bring them home to defend Australia.”

 

We basically pulled out of the European theatre of the World War and stop really participating in it, brought all the guys back home and just focused on fighting Japan for the rest of the war. We weren’t really involved in the ultimate defeat of the Germans.

 

So that needs to be also kind of taken into consideration. When we’re venerating our ancestors, we’re venerating mostly from World War II, our ancestors who fought a race war against the Japanese which was a valid race war and a necessary race war in order to preserve our sovereignty. Unfortunately because of basically the traitorous government in Britain which made decisions to the benefit of their jewish financier backers rather than the British Empire itself, they refused peace with Hitler, they refused alliance with Hitler which would have been in their actual geopolitical interest in order to essentially be complicit in the defeat of all European empires including themselves by the communists from the east and the American, like liberals, from across the pond.

 

And so the British Empire was no more. And now Australia was left even though the Japanese were defeated, we were now left basically dependent upon an American led international order. Basically became part of an American Empire rather than a British Empire.

 

And due to being part of that American Empire we became infected with all of the ideas that ultimately destroyed and unravelled the White Australia Policy and kind of sent our country on the trajectory that it’s now on today, one of suicidal self destruction!

 

And the same thing happened to all of America’s so-called allies in Western Europe. Their so-called allies in Western Europe also have gone on this suicidal trajectory of self destruction as is America itself because it’s ruled by a kind of anti-White jewish oligarchy.

 

So World War II in that sense was a mistake. But at the time America seemed like at that time America was a 90% White country. An America that had millions of members in the Ku Klux Klan, who had a racial restrictive immigration policy, who had segregation in the south, because obviously they had black [post —] slave populations, but they had segregation. No one at that time could have foreseen the trajectory that America was on, except maybe like, a few really philosophically wise individuals. But the average person and the average statesman could not have foreseen what would come of America.

 

And so the decisions that were made at that time by our leadership and the feelings and sentiments of the people and the soldiers at that time, I think, were fundamentally noble and virtuous. These people were not traitors. John Curtin, our prime minister in World War II, he was not a traitor! I think he was sincere, sincerely trying to take the steps that he needed to defend White Australia. And ultimately, when the war with Japan began, he pulled everyone out, all the Aussies, out of the European and African theatre and said:

 

“You got to get back here and fight to defend White Australia here right now and mobilise the whole country to fight Japan.”

 

And we emerged victorious with many great military victories over the Japanese, particularly Kokoda, which was particularly impressive. So that’s worthy of remembrance and veneration. Absolutely!

 

What do you think about that, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: God, I don’t know. Which part?

 

Joel Davis: Well, World War II in general. Because obviously you share my sympathies towards the Germans under National Socialism, but at the same time, you’ll be remembering our ancestors. I think you have ancestors who served in World War II? I do.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m not exactly sure.

 

Joel Davis: Okay.

 

[40:10]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: As I was saying before, though, I was getting at something. I was saying that, yeah, I felt White people didn’t have a culture, but I was always curious about the Nazis. And I started to learn more about National Socialism by reading Mein Kampf. And I learnt a lot about it. And I had to tell everybody! I had this girlfriend, right? And I wouldn’t shut up! I kept talking about the point of life basically being about breeding up, about enhancing your genetic stock and not degrading it through miscegenation or just genetic downgrading. And we talked a lot about that. I chewed her head off about it a lot. And sometime later, she said to me:

 

“Look, I agree with you and I understand what you’re saying, and I’m glad that you have taught me about alternative World War II history. I’m glad that we discussed the reality of race and the point of life, as you call it.”

 

But she said:

 

“I was happier before.”

 

She said to me:

 

“I wish you didn’t tell me these things because I was happier before.”

 

She said:

 

“Now I feel like I can see a giant elephant in the room now. I feel like I’m surrounded by retards, like dysgenic retards, and it’s depressing!”

 

Yeah? And we parted ways a short time later and I never spoke to her again.

 

So this is a regular person, a person who’s intelligent enough, a member of Australian society, to understand the reality of race and how important it is not to throw away what you have genetically, ethnically.

 

But then when she came to understand that, she just acknowledged to me, admitted openly that she was happier before she knew that! The society she grew up in basically pushed the opposite message, and that she felt like an outcast. She felt like she wished she hadn’t been told that. She wished she never had to understand that, because it was depressing for her.

 

Do you think the average person. This is like the question that I’m getting to. Do you think the average person can be a National Socialist? Do you think they’re capable of enduring what they have to endure? Do you think they need to be a National Socialist in order to vote for a party that represents those ideals? Because I don’t feel they are capable. I don’t feel they have the strength.

 

I feel like a small leadership group has the strength, but the ordinary people, the masses, they’re neither capable nor willing to be ethnic nationalists. Has there ever been a time in history where the entire country, any country, has been consciously ethnically nationalist, every single member? Or have they just been more concerned about their own personal lives and misgivings? Are they actually geared to participate in politics and philosophy on the level of being a conscious ethnic nationalist? Do they need to be? What do you think?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I mean, obviously Australia in the first half of the 20th century was a consciously ethnically nationalist people.

 

Blair Cottrell: Was it, though? Was it, though? Was it, though? Because you go through old footage, there’s old ABC footage, and it’s from like the 60s or something, I think. And even then you’ve got people saying:

 

“Oh, I’ve got nothing against this race and that race. And a few of them can come in. That’s okay, as long as they’re not intermarrying.”

 

Joel Davis: That’s in the sixties. So things are starting to change. The television was introduced and the kind of post World War II judeo-American propaganda started getting disseminated and so on, and the culture had shifted quite significantly at that point.

 

But in the early 20th century I think the culture was very staunchly racialist. The media, the clear political will of the people as represented by who they were voting for and what kind of policies were convincing to the Australian people.

 

And also the lead up to the Federation of Australia, the Labor movement in this country the political movements in this country in general all geared towards racial preservation. And labour movement was engaged in a lot of industrial action that was basically geared against the use of coloured labour and so on. The public overwhelmingly supported them. When you had kind of race riots and so on, … Because like look at for example the Eureka Stockade*. The Eureka Stockade was essentially like an armed rebellion against the government at the time. The leaders of the Eureka Stockade ultimately were not thrown in prison, they were basically given a slap on the wrist.

 

[* The Eureka Rebellion was a series of events involving gold miners who revolted against the British administration of the colony of Victoria, Australia, during the Victorian gold rush. It culminated in the Battle of the Eureka Stockade, which took place on 3 December 1854 at Ballarat between the rebels and the colonial forces of Australia. The fighting resulted in an official total of 27 deaths and many injuries, the majority of casualties being rebels. Wikipedia]

 

And then a whole bunch of them entered politics and got elected into the Parliament and one of them became the Premier of Victoria and then they passed a whole bunch of legislation greatly restricting immigration into the colony of Victoria at the time.

 

So the people rallied around violent rebels that were opposing the importation of Chinese labour basically. And these policies were also wildly, wildly popular in New South Wales and Queensland, all the other colonies where they experienced non-White immigration.

 

And then that was the fuel that led to Federation, that was the fuel that led to World War I etc. And the enthusiasm that the people had for these things. When the “Great White Fleet” they called it, which was the American Navy came and toured Australia and visited in a kind of friendly way in 1908 it was greeted by massive crowds. They’re basically described like there’s never been crowds that big in Sydney or Melbourne before to come and see these great ships of the US Navy and then all the speeches that were being given as:

 

“Look at this great White power from the other side of the Pacific Ocean! Look how exceptional their big ships are. We need to be allied with these, with our kind of Anglo Saxon brothers from across the Pacific against you know, the yellow menace! And what proud, what great White men these people are and what testament to area ingenuity, these great feats of technology are!”

 

And people were ecstatic about this and it was like a big deal.

 

[* Great White Fleet – On 20 August 1908 a round the world peace mission by the American fleet arrived in Port Jackson, Sydney. The US navy was on a round the world cruise which had set out eight months earlier on 16 December 1907. The sixteen warships, led by the flagship Connecticut, were painted white to denote peace. They would be known as The Great White Fleet. https://mhnsw.au › stories › general › great-white-fleet]

 

 

 

 

Can you imagine people acting like that today? No, it was a completely different world back then. When they opened the shrine, …

 

[46:49]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Do we still have people or do we just have pre-programmed goyim? Is that the problem? Well, think about it. That’s a serious question. The people as thinking, feeling, independent creatures as they were pre-television. Do we still have people like that? Do they still exist? Or are they just morons out there waiting to be told what to do and how to vote? And do we need to adjust ourselves to the receptivity of the moron in order to make any sort of political success? Or are we counting on a people support from a people that are no longer there?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I think the television definitely radically degraded the consciousness of the masses. I think you can see a massive shift when the television is invented and widely disseminated in the politics of every Western country. And what comes with that you get second wave feminism, you get mass immigration, etc.

 

Blair Cottrell: And it’s even worse! It’s worse. It’s not just television. Have you, like, Zoomers can’t write. Zoomers cannot write! Have you seen the handwriting? They can’t count money. Like the screen error has made it even worse! Like new generations are even more retarded! They’re kind of more radical because they’re so desensitised, but they’re still more retarded!

 

So we’re dealing with a different type of humanity than the sort of humanity that accepted ethnic nationalism as self evident. We’re dealing with a completely different type of humanity.

 

And so I’m not sure whether ethnic nationalism will fly on a large scale. I think Aussie pride might fly or something really simplistic. And you as the leading force, can be an ethnic nationalist organisation with your own extensive philosophy, but the person that you’re trying to appeal to, the sort of human you’re trying to appeal to, isn’t actually capable of understanding anything about ethnic nationalism. They’re capable of being racist a little bit. And maybe you could make them feel more confident about being racist, less afraid of consequences, because that’s what stops them from being racist.

 

At the end of the day, it’s just fear of consequence. If there wasn’t the applicable or necessary fear of consequence out there in society, people would just be as naturally racist as they’ve always been. It’s fear that stops them from doing that. So you could make them feel more comfortable about being racist. But my gut tells me that the average person out there in society isn’t actually capable of giving themselves over to a conscious ethnic nationalism. But I don’t really think they need to be at the same time.

 

Joel Davis: Well, the masses don’t necessarily need to be because the masses largely get led around by, … I mean, the masses aren’t really in support of what the government is currently doing either. Most people don’t agree with pretty much all the major policies of the government. Most people are sick of the woke stuff, they’re sick of the transgenderism. Immigration isn’t popular. The policies of the government are not popular and they’re getting less and less popular through time.

 

And I think as you said, the younger generation, it’s kind of polarising in both directions. But you know, without the television generation, they are a lot less trusting of authority. They’re a lot more kind of open minded to different ideas.

 

And what we’re seeing in Europe or what we’re seeing in America is that the younger generation is actually extremely Right-wing. So like in America, the younger Zoomers are way more Right-wing than even, than any other generation. Like the age bracket between 18 and, 201 is the most Right-wing of like almost any generation in America at the moment. And also the other thing is that racism and nationalism, these aren’t very complex ideas. Black people, not that smart. Black people are intensely loyal to each other politically.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but that’s because there’s no consequence for not being loyal to each other.

 

Joel Davis: But that shows that like in principle, like it’s not about the stupidity of the masses or anything, as you said, it’s a social game. So what is going to give White people the confidence to be racist? It’s a real question. It’s not that they’re not capable of racism. It’s actually a natural thing. Or that it wouldn’t be possible.

 

Blair Cottrell: Less consequence.

 

Joel Davis: It’s about how do you inspire them, how do you basically give them a sense of permission, or a sense of inspiration or some kind of how do you attract them to the principles of nationalism and racism? That’s the question. And there is a way to do it. There has to be because it’s inherent.

 

Blair Cottrell: Needs to be something in it for them. They need to benefit from it and not lose. And a result of being racist currently they lose and they lose hard. So if they can benefit from being racist, they’ll do it all day. People are selfish and simple.

 

Joel Davis: We’re not going to be able to get to the point where people can benefit from being racist until we have a critical mass of people that are willing to suffer. Like you don’t need everyone, you don’t need the like 50% plus one to be willing to suffer for it. We do need a much bigger movement that can sustain and grow to a level where you can start to get, where it can start to actually, socially reward its participants more. We have to make racism fun. We have to make it engaging.

 

And that’s part of what we’re trying to do with the organisation. Like one of the ambitions is to have a network of gyms and pubs that we control across all Australian cities where young White people can hang out and have community and enjoy themselves and throw parties and throw events constantly that are fun to attend for our people so that they can have a communal and social basis to participate in the movement. Make the movement fun, make the movement engaging, give them something to be in the movement and then they’re going to actually stay in the movement, participate in the movement.

 

And then on a political level what we’re going to put forward is a whole series of policies that are going to materially make your life a lot better. And the current system is making your life a hell of a lot worse. And it’s only going to get worse and worse! And people are happy to go along with the status quo while there’s a reasonable amount of prosperity and comfort.

 

[53:09]

 

But in 10 years time, you think it’s bad now, it’s not really that bad yet. Wait, in 10, 15 years time it’s going to get really bad! People are going to be more and more open minded to a more radical politics and a more radical solution. Also racism is the only thing that’s actually funny anymore. You know, they used to be able to control the population through really good propaganda.

 

Back in the 80s, the 90s, the quality of Hollywood movies was so high. The quality of, just ZOG slop, music, television, etc., was actually quite high. And so you could just kind of like turn your brain off and just get like sucked into The Matrix of Bread and Circuses so much more easily. The prevailing culture was so much more enjoyable to kind of lose yourself in. It’s no longer the case. They can’t produce good films anymore, they can’t produce good music anymore. They don’t have the same cultural cache or gravitas that they once did.

 

So the ability to kind of prop up the prevailing like Leftist morality is diminishing. Whilst at the same time if we have the fortitude and we have the ambition and the creativity, we have the ability to create a counterculture that can be quite fun and engaging for the younger generation of Whites who are increasingly disaffected and alienated. I do believe there’s a pathway there to making nationalism fun, to making nationalism enjoyable to make, to activating, to making nationalism amenable to people who have selfish rather than simply selfless, romantic reasons to embrace it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I sometimes fear becoming an entertainer, though. I sometimes worry that the content I’m making, the effort that I’m making politically, may just be consumed as entertainment by people sitting on their asses scrolling. They might find it amusing and funny, but then they’re just going to scroll to the next thing and it’s just another 15 to 25 second moment in their lives that they feel amused by. And that’s the only purpose that I’m serving in the lives of ordinary people. That’s very cynical of course. There’s probably greater psychological impacts the content has on people, and that’s why we make it, that’s why we put this sort of stuff out there.

 

But look, I’m especially cranky because I’ve got this eye infection and my whole eye socket’s just throbbing. It’s very painful. So I’m kind of being a cynic tonight. I’m playing devil’s advocate a little bit, so don’t mind me. I’m doing my best not to crack the shits, but Anzac Day tomorrow, we got the Dawn Service in the morning. This is a very significant day for Australians. It’s very special. It’s really helps, or how should I say it, underpins how important ancestral worship is to us. And by us, I don’t just mean Australians, but every member of our race around the world that is related to us in any way, shape or form. That’s if you pay attention.

 

And Tom Sewell was telling me this today, he’s been telling me for a while, ancestral worship, veneration of the ancestors is kind of integral to our traditions as a people. Whatever country you go to that is a majority White, there is a great deal of respect, admiration and even worship of the ancestors that were the precondition for our existence. Now we are here because of them. And on Anzac Day this year, the message I’d like people to take away, or the feeling I’d like people to experience, is how little your life actually means, is how small your life is in the grand scheme of things.

 

The fact that we are mortals and we have to die in quite a short time, but that through our deeds and what we choose to believe in our national community, our race can live forever.

 

And I think that’s the essence of what we’re doing on Anzac Day, when we appreciate the sacrifices that have been made for us in order for us to be here now. Right. We are respecting, venerating, glorifying all of our ancestors that made the greatest sacrifice that serves as the precondition for our presence here now. That’s what Anzac Day means to me.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, absolutely! And ancestor veneration is basically the ancient religion of the Aryans. You know, the ancient Aryans, they practised in different ways, but they fundamentally practised a whole series of rites and rituals venerating their previous ancestors. They had kind of Patriarchal, patrilineal cults and the development of the pantheon of pagan gods kind of spun out of ancestor worship as its foundation. So it’s actually kind of an organic form of our native spirituality of our distant ancestors.

 

And when you think about the Shrine of Remembrance in Melbourne, which is an incredible building that shrine looks kind of like a pagan temple. It has Christian elements in it, but it looks like a pagan temple, you could say. It looks like something out of like ancient Greece or something. And that temple, which is what it is, was built to venerate the ancestors at. Literally it’s called the Shrine of Remembrance by crowdfunding of the veterans of the First World War.

 

So the Anzacs literally Pooled their cash together and built that. It wasn’t built by the government, it was very carefully designed. And that’s where I’m going to be tomorrow, venerating the ancestors. When that was opened in the early 1930s, over 300,000 people attended!

 

Now, let me look up. What was the population of Melbourne? I don’t know exactly what was the population of Melbourne?

 

[59:26]

 

Blair Cottrell: Only about a million. Less than a million.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. In 1932. Let’s have a look.

 

1932, yeah. It was a bit less than a million. 950,000. So it’s around a million people. So 300,000 people showed up to the opening of the shrine.

 

So that’s like three out of every ten Melburnians showing up, basically.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, they all. I reckon they all had a personal investment in it because the that wasn’t built by the taxpayer, by the government. It was crowdfunded the funds necessary to build the shrine by RSL, I think. And so everyone who attended those 300,000 people were probably all investors. They probably all put money in for it to be built. So it literally is a structure of the people. Like, this is not something the government built, this is something the people put together themselves.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but not just that it’s such an impressive building. It’s such a powerful, potent building. It shows. I mean, a lot of people would have had family members that fought. Almost everyone would have had family members that fought in World War I. A lot of people would have had family members that died in World War I so obviously it was a big deal to them for those reasons. But the big Union Jacks, I’ve seen the picture they have in underneath the shrine of like, the first. I don’t know if it was Remembrance Day or what, the first kind of big kind of opening, ceremonial opening of the shrine. It was a big event, and it was about venerating those who had given their blood for the Empire. That’s how people used to think back then. It was the biggest deal. Nothing was a bigger deal than that.

 

And that was when we had a country that had a robust White Australia Policy. That was when we had a country that was a real country because those were people that were conscious of their mortality, conscious of the fact that anything you have in this world you have to fight for that. Blood is what binds us and that the blood of sacrifice is what makes possible everything that we have. That was the people that understood that. And the people that were conscious of the greatness of our race that had been achieved through many, many victories, many, many glories in battle.

 

And that’s how a great people think. That’s how a noble people think. Now, who thinks like that now? You know, Anzac Day, when I went last year to the shrine, you know, half the faces there were like, Asian tourists and stuff. And there was like this lame speech about how multicultural the army is now and all the women that get to serve in the army now and how great and how diverse it is and how wonderful that is. And all this bullshit from, like, women in pantsuits that don’t have the first idea what the fuck they’re talking about. It’s fucking disgusting and disgraceful! That’s what it’s become. It’s a farce!

 

So if you go tomorrow, have that content in your heart for these scumbags as well that are up there. You’re standing there for your ancestors, but you’re not there for them. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t go. Some people don’t go to these things because they’re like:

 

“Oh the politicians and everything get up there and sell this cucked shit!”

 

And then you see like a bunch of pajeet army cadets marching around or something. And you’re not there for them, you’re there for the ancestors. They’re there watching down, looking at us. That’s why you’re there. So contempt for the scum that rule over us now and the desecration of their sacrifice. But you got to stay true to what it was. When we win, Anzac Day is going to be like it used to be again. The people will be inspired again.

 

But, yeah, dwindling numbers, dwindling concern. But one thing you’ll notice, the Dawn Service. At your local Dawn Service, there’ll be a lot of White faces, there won’t be too many immigrant faces because the Indians are not going to get out of bed at 5 o’clock in the morning, the fucking Chinese are not going to get out of bed at 5 o’clock in the morning, etc., to come down and venerate our ancestors because it’s our ancestors, not theirs. And they’ll try and say things like:

 

“Oh, the Anzacs were a multicultural fighting force because there were like five Chinese guys that went to Gallipoli or something!”

 

It’s fucking bullshit! Those were White men fighting for a White Australia. End of!

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d like to see any Welcome to Country or whatever bullshit they try to come up with at the ceremonies shouted down personally, you know. Legally, of course, but you have the right to protest. If you’re at one of these ceremonies, you have the rights to voice your protest if you’re not happy with what’s being said by the official bureaucrats on the microphones. This is still your country, you still have a say. So don’t be scared to make your voice heard tomorrow morning. If they try to pull any bullshit!

 

[1:04:26]

 

Joel Davis: Old mate in the chat said:

 

“If there’s any abo shit at the one I go to, I’m not sure how I’ll react. Like, I mean, marching up to the mic and going off about it! I’ll boo at least! Every year I feel it get more tense.”

 

Yeah, well, if there’s a welcome country, Welcome to Country tomorrow and whatever service you’re at, boo that fucking shit! And hopefully the people around you start booing.

 

Blair Cottrell: When you take a few mates. If you go with a few people and they agree to sort of echo your sentiments, you know, it can catch on quite quickly. I think I keep cutting out too. Like, sorry, if I’m cutting out my WiFi signals a little bit off.

 

But like I said the if the feeling is there, it should be contagious amongst other people too. I wouldn’t expect too much of ordinary folks because like I said, there have been conditioned by the fear of consequence for voicing any protest against the official social policy of the government and the bureaucracy. But I don’t know, the thing about regular people is they’re fickle, and if they feel enough people are doing something then they’ll join in with it, whatever it is. So, you know. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Exactly.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s just some advice.

 

Joel Davis: Human beings are herd animals. They go along with what everyone around them is doing.

 

And so in the same way that it seems like everyone around you is a cuck, if there are enough nationalists, if there are enough Nazis or whatever, they would be a Nazi, there would be whatever is around them.

 

And so that’s what our political mission is like giving people the licence to express their instincts. Like the instincts are still in there. But few people have the balls, have the self consciousness to move first. We are the first movers. We are the ones that, we are the trailblazers.

 

And then eventually, if enough follow in our wake and we build enough momentum, then we will give the people at large the confidence to finally express what they really feel inside. That has been repressed for decades. And that’s what the mission is, that’s what we’re doing, that’s the objective. But is there anything else you wanted to say about Anzac Day, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: Nah. Look, I’m in a lot of pain, so I’m gonna just let you finish up. If you don’t know if you’re tuning in late. I’ve got this like brutal eye infection. Don’t know how it happened. It’s in the eyelid. It’s cellulitis, but only in the eyelid. It’s not actually in the eye socket, which means I won’t lose my vision, but I need to take antibiotics to kill it because it could spread to the eye socket and if it does, that’s bad for me. But I’m just sitting here in a very bad mood and experiencing a lot of pain.

 

So I’m gonna go.

 

Joel Davis: Listen, you can’t, can you react at least to Matt Trihey his, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s gonna cheer me up!

 

I just saw a video of that late. So Matt Trihey is leader of, I think it’s called the National Workers Alliance. He’s been very aggressive and very, very energetic for the last, I’d say 12 to 18 months. Hosting meetings, doing protests. The guy is a true patriot! It’s good to see a real Aussie patriot, salt of the earth, working class builder. Pretty sure he’s a builder too. And he’s out there on the front lines doing what needs to be done. And where was he was at some sort of Teals meeting, wasn’t he? Yes.

 

Joel Davis: So the electorate of Kooyong which is one of the more affluent parts of Melbourne where Toorak and Glen Iris and suburbs like this are located within. Traditionally it’s always been a Liberal seat because it’s a more affluent area. But the last election they voted in a Teal independent by the name of Monique Ryan. And the so-called Teals are a disgusting blend of like the social policies of the Greens mixed with the economic policies of the Liberals.

 

Basically like the most disgusting all mixed together into the most [word unclear] and appeals to rich White women who watch the ABC religiously. It’s like Hillary Clinton basically at the last election in [word unclear] Anyway she had some meeting and they were talking about why we need to give more money to the ABC or some fucking bullshit like that so we can have more communist propaganda more anti-White tax funded communist propaganda pumped out into all these Boomer White women who are the only ones that even fucking [word unclear]. And he confronted them that mass immigration is causing, is exposing our people to increases in crime, rapes, burglaries, violence etc. And then all the Boomer White women at the meeting had a hysterical reaction. One of them even started shrieking. One of these old ladies punched him in the face! [chuckling] But it was on Channel Nine news tonight actually. He made the news so I think he did this stunt. Maybe it was yesterday and then the video went out today. The Noticer posted it. I shared it on Telegram if you want to watch it.

 

But I’m going to play. I haven’t actually seen the clip. I want to see how the news covered it. So it made the news. Let’s see how the news covered it because it’s a pretty interesting story. We’ll watch the news and if they spin it really hard I’ll play the original clip.

 

[Channel 9 news clip]

 

[Reporter] It was meant to be a peaceful community chat until far-Right agitated Matt Trihey loudly barged in and was punched in the face by a woman in the audience.

 

[Dr. Ryan] Fortunately it didn’t really connect. She was much smaller than he was quite a big man.

 

[Reporter] Teal MP Monique Ryan and Labor candidate Clive Crosby shocked by what happened. Dr. Ryan consoled the woman after the incident.

 

[Dr. Ryan] She was sorry that she’d lost control in the way that she did. But she found the whole thing very distressing.

 

[Reporter] Trihey is the leader of the National Workers Alliance. He denies he’s a Neo Nazi, but was once a member of Thomas Sewell’s White nationalist group, the Lads Society.

 

[Rachel Dexter] This individual has been part of groups that are run by neo-Nazis, well publicised Neo Nazis.

 

[Reporter] Tensions have flared across the campaign in the past, 24 hours. Two men charged over separate violent incidents in Sydney.

 

[PM Albanese] There’s no place for violence in our political system. We’re a democracy. It’s important that people engage in a respectful way. That includes people who are candidates, but it includes everyone.

 

[Dr. Ryan] I hope that after this election campaign things will cool down, the temperature will drop a bit, we’ll be able to get back to normal.

 

[Reporter] Whether those inflaming tensions listen is up for debate. Brett McLeod, Nine News.

 

[1:11:32]

 

Blair Cottrell: Do me a favour. Hang on.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I don’t know what just happened to Blair there, but notice how they basically blamed him for some lady punching him in the face. They’re like:

 

“Oh, violence is escalating!”

 

And it’s apparently his fault. They’re victim blaming. Imagine if he went in there and punched someone in the face. It’d be like:

 

“Far-Right, thug beats people up at a meeting!”

 

But if they hit him, … Now, Matt Trihey, by the way, was a professional MMA fighter. He was, he fought in, I don’t think he fought in the UFC, but he fought in, I think Pride. So I think an old lady punching him in the face doesn’t really bother him too much. He’s a pretty tough dude.

 

But yeah, [chuckling] I mean, it’s just kind of ridiculous, the double standard:

 

“Oh, well like we got to give this poor old lady a hug because she sperged out and punched Trihey in the face!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Isn’t that weird behaviour! How the aggressor, the person trying to punch someone, who cares if it’s an old lady, she still tried to punch the guy! She’s hugged. She’s hugged and treated like a victim while the actual victim of the assault is like continuously like pushed out of the building as though he’s the cause for concern.

 

I mean, I realise she’s just an old lady and who cares that she punched someone? I don’t care! I’m sure Matt Trihey doesn’t care. It’s not like he’s at home with some ice on that shiner. He’d just be laughing about it. It’s just still very strange behaviour. You know, we’re told so often that it’s never okay to put your hands on anyone. It’s the you’re a dirty, horrible person if you even think about assaulting another human being!

 

But then when some lady does it:

 

“Oh, the poor thing! Let’s give her a hug!”

 

That’s fucking weird, man! What? Obviously I don’t even know how to interpret it, actually. I can’t comment further than it’s just fucking weird!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I can’t be bothered playing the original video. You can go find it on The Noticer. You could find it on my page. I think Tom shared it. I don’t know if you shared it. I think you shared it. So you can go watch it on Telegram or on Twitter.

 

But yeah, like, literally, these women are shrieking. He goes in there. He’s calm. He just starts talking about crime statistics and immigration and asking for an answer.

 

Blair Cottrell: And that’s all he does. That’s pretty much all he does! All he does is list off crime stats about how many immigrants are actually committing crimes, how many immigrants are committing rape, how much rape has increased in certain states and regions in proportion to the increase in immigration. That’s all he does! All he does is list off facts. He just spits facts, and people lose their minds and are now physically attacking him. How insane is that? How retarded are people? How embarrassing it is to be a member of the same race as people like that? Like, do you ever feel like that, Joel? Do you ever feel like you’re born on the wrong planet or something? It’s like, what the fuck, what’s going on here? Who are these fucking cs?

 

Joel Davis: Why are we letting retarded old ladies participate in politics? Like, shut up, grandma! You’re a retard! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Why do they even have to participate in politics? I mean, I don’t know. Are they bored? Maybe they feel like they’re making a difference or something.

 

Joel Davis: They are bored. They’re sitting at home watching television all day, and then the news is talking about politics all the time, and they get all hyped up on it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Imagine the story. Imagine the story. Oh, Gladys!

 

Joel Davis: Ingesting so much propaganda. And then someone comes in and says something mean coded.

 

And then they literally start shrieking. One of them was like, fucking shrieking like a banshee! Some old lady punches a man in the face! And they’re trying to drag him out, but he’s like, he’s a strong guy, so he’s just kind of like, whatever. But these old women are trying to drag him out. And then some random, like, soy Jack old dude is like:

 

“How could you do this in here!”

 

Like, just like doing this like weird outrage thing. It’s fucking pathetic! But the reaction on social media was funny. Everyone was kind of just taking the piss out of these retarded Boomers.

 

But then like the news. The news is like, we know about how much bias they have because we play clips of them covering us all the time. You know, they just always frame things in such a ridiculous way.

 

[1:15:55]

 

Blair Cottrell: But I think it’s obvious some craze Leftist attack someone physically. The statement from the relevant statesman, and I think it was from actually Albanese, the Prime Minister himself in this particular instance, is:

 

“Violence from either side it won’t be tolerated!”

 

But then whenever something mean is said by someone on the far-Right, as they call it, the far-Right, well then, it’s always the far-Right that are targeted specifically. And like you’ve got to change laws to stop them offending people. Then you see some actual physical assault or violence and their response is:

 

“Well, both sides need to be careful with what they’re doing.”

 

Joel Davis: It’s so where her outburst was justified because her “feelings” got hurt.

 

But then we get treated, we don’t commit violence, we hurt people’s feelings, therefore we’re the bad guy. And so like:

 

“Women can’t be responsible for the fact that they’re hysterical. It’s obviously the man’s fault because we made them upset. Because female emotions and feelings need to rule over rationality or any other kind of modicum of reasonable, consistent standards for behaviour, that goes out the window because an old lady got upset and started crying and therefore she’s the victim.”

 

And this is what we’re ruled by as a society. I was looking at this study the other day. There was a study that was done, a Meta analysis of basically all forms of literature in the English language. I think they got an AI to assess what’s the prevalence of words that describe rational thought and the prevalence of words that describe emotional predilections, and what’s the ratio. How rational or how emotional is the general language of everything published in the English language. And from the beginning of the Industrial Revolution up to the late 1960s, about 1970, it gets more and more and more rational through time to the point where it’s super majority rational. Then in 1970, after the second wave feminism and women are introduced into the workforce and academia and politics and so on, you get this complete cascade where now everything published in the English language is hyper emotional, more emotional than ever!

 

And that’s what’s happened to our society writ large. We live in a society where emotions rule over reason. Well, that is a society that is going to become deeply dysfunctional. Because that’s the definition of immaturity. That’s the definition essentially of insanity!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. When “hurt feelings” are the inspiration for crackdown on free speech. Can’t say this, can’t raise your arm in the air.

 

Basically, everything, every change legally, every social standard is built around not “hurting people’s feelings”. I can remember when I was in school, when I was in primary school, everything got banned. Everything the boys were doing got banned! And it got banned throughout my time in primary school. It’s like I was born in the exact right generation to see it all happen. First thing that got banned was Pokemon cards. And it happened on the day that I got my first ever deck on my birthday. I remember this like, I think I was in grade three and Mum bought me a deck of Pokemon cards. First time. I was excited to go to school with my new holographic nine tails and flex on all the boys because no one else had that. I think one other kid might have had it, but he was glorified for it.

 

Anyway, the day I get there, there’s an announcement on the speakers that Pokemon cards have been causing too much conflict amongst the boys and they’re banned. They’re no longer allowed. And if any boys had Pokemon cards on them, they had to leave them in their school bags, take them home and never bring them back. Pokemon cards banned!

 

So then we started playing Australian League football. We used the trees as goal posts. Three months later or so, that was banned! Because some kid got tackled and cried. And it was all banned by a female vice principal. The actual principal of the school was a man named Peter Williams, but he was never around. He was always absent. It seemed like the vice principal, some woman, I can’t remember her name, she was ruling the roost instead of him. She was the one banning everything. You know, we couldn’t play footy anymore, we couldn’t do Pokemon cards.

 

So then we started doing marbles that got banned because someone threw a marble at someone and their parents got called and they were unhappy about it. So no more marbles! Then British Bulldogs in the Marble Pit because there was no more use for the Marble Pit now.

 

So we just started playing British Bulldogs. But some kids shorts, school shorts, got torn a little bit when he got tackled and the parents, the mother called the school and bitched about it. And so that was banned!

 

And I remember we were sitting around once at lunchtime primary school. By the time everything was banned, we were like grade six, the final year of primary school.

 

And I said to the boys:

 

“What are we allowed to do? We can’t even do anything!”

 

We couldn’t even play brandy, throw a tennis ball at each other. And what is, what does Sewell call this? The gynocracy? I think he calls it the “Gynocracy”, where everything’s banned for the sake because someone might get hurt or it may upset someone, you’re not allowed to do it. No one’s allowed to have any sort of fun or do anything for the sake of saving feelings and someone might get hurt. So it’s not allowed.

 

And I witnessed all that in primary school. I witnessed the birth of the gynocracy. And now the gynocracy is in politics, now it’s in Parliament and now it’s bearing down on us from that position, from the position of institutional leadership. And that’s what we suffer, my friends, we suffer the giantocracy! And how do we defeat it? How do we defeat the giantocracy? By just not caring and doing whatever we want. Because the gynocracy has gone so far, there’s not even a lot of capable police officers anymore.

 

So it’s not like there’s any serious consequence waiting around the corner anyway. So I think that’s how you actually get around it. You literally just play whatever game you want to play, say whatever you want to say, make any gesture you want to make, believe what you want to believe, and so long as you’re not actually physically hurting anyone, who cares? Do what you want to do. I guess if enough people do that, then the gynocracy fails, right?

 

[1:22:21]

 

 

Joel Davis: Well, that’s the origin story of an ancient myth in our people, the myth of Percival, or of Parsifal, if you’re a German, who was one of the knights of King Arthur’s knights. One of the knights of the Round Table, who was one of the only ones to actually attain the Holy Grail. And at the beginning, when he was a boy, he was raised in the forest by his mother, and his mother basically kept him away from civilisation because his father and his two older brothers, they went and became knights and they died in battle. And she was all he had left. And so she took him out to the Woods and raised him in the Woods and told him nothing of his of his older brothers and of his father to try and keep him safe. And he’s playing out in the forest one day and he comes across some of the Knights of the Round Table, some of King Arthur’s knights, and they tell him all about what it’s like to be a knight. And immediately he’s like:

 

“I want to be a knight! That sounds awesome!”

 

And he goes back and he says:

 

“Mom, I’m going to go be a knight!”

 

And she has a mental breakdown:

 

“No, you can’t leave me. You must stay here where it’s safe!”

 

And eventually he wins the argument and she realises that there’s nothing that she can say to stop him. And she knits him a sweater to wear at all times and says:

 

“Wear this.”

 

And then he leaves and she dies of a broken heart. And there’s a later time where he’s in a great battle where he has to take the sweater off, take off the comfort of the gynocracy, basically, in order to win!

 

And that’s the beginning, that’s the origin story, is leaving behind security of the womb, the security of the kind of maternal sphere where everything is soft and all the threats are neutralised and everyone has to be nice to each other and sweet to each other and everyone is cared for and nurtured. In order to achieve your destiny, in order to become great, in order to become noble, you have to cast that off and go out. And go on adventures and fight and battle and so on, and find your way to the grail, to the meaning of it all, to be the hero.

 

So that’s a [word unclear] for a reason.

 

Blair Cottrell: Don’t you think that men need to be able to compete? Men need an outlet for the energy that they have as men. They need to be able to Barter and trade and fight. They need to be able to play sport. They need to be able to compete! If they can’t for the sake of people not getting hurt or feelings not getting hurt, don’t you think that’s why you see such radical explosions of rage in society now? That’s why men are so angry, because they’ve got all this repressed energy.

 

I mean, you hear stories about guys just snapping over what seems to be nothing, and you’ve got this domestic violence problem where a lot of the time it’s blamed on men, but really it’s just men are being pushed too far, or they’ve got so much repressed energy because there’s no way for them to actually express that basic competitive element, the desire to achieve something, the desire to build something, to work towards some greater projects. You know what I mean? Like there’s just kind of like no real outlet for a lot of men.

 

And so I think that’s why you’ve got examples or scenarios in society where some guy is setting a car on fire with his whole family inside, or just losing his shit at seemingly nothing. But really it was 20 years of the gynocracy telling him he’s not allowed to do anything because he’s bad because he’s a man! I don’t know. It’s something to think about because you can’t just cancel everything men do and expect men to react in some sort of obedient, passive way.

 

Obviously there’s going to be consequences for that. Men aren’t going to accept that. Men aren’t going to react well to that kind of system. I need to think more about this because the idea just came into my head then I’m so I’m not going to be able to articulate it as well as I’d like to.

 

Joel Davis: Also, everything wrong with our society is downstream from fucking cucked men! Men who adapt their behaviour to make their girlfriend or wife happy. Which means avoiding risk taking, not spending time with the boys, but spending time with her in the security of the lounge suite, watching goy flicks, eating Uber Eats, or taking her to out shopping or something. That’s what she wants to be doing. She wants to be safe. Maybe if she’s a so-called tradition wife, she wants to go move to the countryside and have chickens and shit! And she doesn’t want you getting arrested, she doesn’t want you going to jail, she doesn’t want you getting into fights, she doesn’t want you dying, and like okay, fair enough.

 

But ultimately that’s your destiny if you’re a political revolutionary, that’s your destiny. If you’re a true, if you’re a warrior, if you’re a man of nobility, a man of strength, you want to go and solve your own problems with your own strength. You don’t want to retreat to safety. That’s the pathway of the coward.

 

[1:27:41]

 

Blair Cottrell: I still don’t see it as either, or, though. I don’t see it as either, or. Like you should be able to spend time with women and fight for what you believe in. You shouldn’t have to choose. Why should you have to fucking choose?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I mean you don’t have to choose because women might try and gaslight you and pressure you, but at the end of the day if you just do what you want, they’ll just accept it. [chuckling] Like realistically.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s nice to make a woman happy. That’s also nice to fight for what you believe in. Like I get reward chemicals from doing both of those things. So I’d like to not in order to do the other. I don’t think it needs to be so two dimensional.

 

Joel Davis: No, I’m not suggesting that it is but ultimately like there’s going to be times where you have to choose one or the other and if you just always choose the cucked safe wife guy option, your life will pass by and you will have been domesticated. And you will not have actually expressed your virility and truly stood for anything. And you will become pacified and you will become neutralised and then you’ll die.

 

Blair Cottrell: Have you seen those dads that actually admit that they’ve been domesticated in an extreme way? And they make a joke out of, they’re like:

 

“Yeah, my wife has my balls in a glass of water next to the bed, ha, ha, ha!”

 

And they like joke about it. What’s with that? That’s nothing to be proud of, bro! It’s not funny at all! [chuckling] You know, if your dad’s like that, if you know someone like that, tell them to wake up to themselves. You know, it’s not funny to not have any sort of sway over your domestic situation. To have no freedom.

 

Joel Davis: That’s what the weak do they do self depreciating jokes as a form of allaying their anxieties be like:

 

“Yeah, I’m a weak piece of shit! Isn’t that relatable? Aren’t you a weak piece of shit too? At least I can like have some kind of common ground with you in my existential dissatisfaction and shame.”

 

I was like:

 

“No, I actually can’t relate to that.”

 

Anyway, let’s do the Superchats and let’s. And let’s end the fucking stream! What do you think?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, I was gonna shuffle off anyway because my eye hurts so much.

 

Joel Davis: Just hang out for five minutes and we’ll be done.

 

Blair Cottrell: All right.

 

Joel Davis: Jake 1219 said:

 

“Coming back to what Joel was saying, Winston, with the help of the British political (Winston Churchill), with the help of the British political establishment and the aristocratic establishment’s old money sold the West out for communism. 100%, right?”

 

I wouldn’t say communism. I’d say jewish interests.

 

But yeah, sure, we talked about that before. There was a show we did on World War II revisionism last year that I thought was pretty good. You can go back and watch that.

 

Home of the Brave said:

 

“‘Neo-Nazi boss’ Thomas Sewell, (as in quotation marks). The way the media covered your registering as a political party couldn’t have gone better. Can’t wait to see how you guys roll it all out. Could be the blueprint for us all.”

 

Well, yeah, it’s nice to get the promotion and it was funny. But yeah, it’s gonna be a process. It’s not happening tomorrow. The election is coming up obviously in a week. The next show is going to be about the election. I’m going to do other streams this week about the election and we’re going to have some other, we’ve got some other things planned for election week. We’re going to get Anzac Day over and done with first and then we’re going to focus on that.

 

But I will say it is funny how the Trumpet of Spastics party, how all of a sudden started copying half baked versions of our talking points and ideas in the last [chuckling] couple weeks and it could help sink the Liberal Party. So it’s pretty funny!

 

And as I said on Telegram:

 

“Clive, if you just called me up three months ago and gave me one of like one of the $90 million you’ve already wasted on this failed election campaign, I could have helped you run it much better and you would have got more votes.”

 

But instead of just stealing my ideas with no credit in a half assed way in the second last week of the election campaign. So you missed the boat on that one. Jake1219 also said:

 

“Question for both. 30% of Australia’s population were born overseas. How do you go about working jobs, operating current society socially, cordially with so many migrants in your face?”

 

I don’t personally. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: With great difficulty and a great amount of selectivity! And not without the urge to headbutt people on the regular. So it’s frustrating! It is, yeah. But when running your own business like I do, you can be selective especially because it’s like word of mouth through people who know people in an area where most people are Aussies, it’s not so bad.

 

But yeah, I could imagine it depends on the field in which you’re working. I know construction is getting pretty bad and you know, I’d probably stay right away from tech. The closer you are to the city, the worse it’s going to be. There’s various factors to consider. But the closer to the city you are, the more patience you’re going to need. I don’t have the patience man to work around these illustrious skilled labourers from overseas.

 

Joel Davis: Fellow Comrade said:

 

“I’m late. I will watch the replay. Thanks guys!”

 

Yeah, cheers.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you see we had $20 from the Comfy Friend who [chuckling] says:

 

“Gerard Rennick White power!”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well if you’re in Queensland, give Gerard Rennick a vote. I hope he gets back into the Senate. He did call out the jews, the Mossad and so on.

 

And I think he’s a good man. You know he’s not everything that we would want, but he’s the best of the bunch. So I hope that he gets re-elected And I like him. I think he’s an all right guy. And a few our guys are working in his campaign team so respect to the grind. And yeah, obviously hail Comfy Friend, friend of the show. I think that’s all the Superchats. Let me check. I think that’s all the Superchats for this evening.

 

So yeah, everyone up early tomorrow for Anzac Day. And yeah, make sure you’re down there. And be there for the ancestors. Venerate tomorrow. Treat tomorrow like a religious holiday. That’s what it is, a day to commemorate our national religion of the ancestors who gave blood for our people. That’s what it’s about. And hail White Australia and hail the Anzacs. Why Power! Fellow Comrades said:

 

“One more Superchat for fun.”

 

Well thanks dude and we’ll end it there. See you next time.

 

[1:34:46]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 4/25/2025 = 10)

Supporter
6 hours ago
same thing the Americans in WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam etc fought for….. Nothing Their lives were wasted
4 likes
Report

‹ Hide 1 reply
TheBeardedIndian
Supporter+
3 hours ago
Top comment. These war memorial events should not be a celebration of sacrifice, they should be annual reminders of not being duped again into dying for no good reason. Celebrating these wars furthers the Jewish plan for Christians to slaughter each other.
0 likes
Report

ThigASteach
Supporter
8 hours ago
Great conversation. Appreciate you guys. #PeaceAndRespect
3 likes
Report

katana17
12 hours ago
[Joel Davis – So Much Has Happened, But We’re Only Just Getting Started – Apr 11, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/04/12/joel-davis-so-much-has-happened-but-were-only-just-getting-started-apr-11-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream video episode Aussie nationalist activists Tom Sewell and Blair Cottrell have a discussion, followed by a separate Blair Cottrell and Joel Davis discussion. The two separate discussion are a result of severe and unreasonable bail conditions imposed on Tom and Joel as a result of police and court harrassment.
2 likes

Delete
fastnail
5 hours ago
And the British and Irish.
1 like
Report

TheShowgun
SubSupporter+
5 hours ago
prayin for your well health Blair!! although, Blair with an eyepatch would go hard af..
0 likes
Report

BlueNorth88
3 hours ago
Blair’s missus can really bang
0 likes
Report

GlobalistJuice
3 hours ago
Joel would be an awesome teacher of history in Australia’s schools – his storytelling is sublime, a flowing voice that is detail engaging with appropriate inflection while retaining a smooth masculine tone that is easy-on-the-ears.
0 likes
Report

evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 hour ago
Blair said something like “The youth are more radical because they’re desensitized,” not because they’re more intellectually curious and open. Sounds correct. I’ll take it though. The masses are a force multiplier for whoever can move them. We just need to be the coolest thing out there and the mindless kids will follow.
0 likes
Report

evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 hour ago
Blair is wondering if he’s a “mere” entertainer. He is, but shows like this are crucial to making these concepts cool and normalizing them. So he plays a crucial role in allowing us to eventually instrumentalize the normie to our ends (and for their benefit).
0 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Damien Richardson: Welcome back to Damienrichardson.online where we are continuing, definitely today we’re continuing to have the difficult conversations. We’re talking to retired academic Frank Salter. Once we hear the title of the book that he’s recently published with a colleague of his, Harry Richardson. I think we might wonder whether he actually retired if he was thrown out of academia because the name of the book is Anglophobia, the Unrecognized Hatred.

 

Frank Salter, welcome to the show.

 

Frank Salter: Nice, nice to be here.

 

Damien Richardson: Now, Frank, what prepossessed you to even be to begin to write a book with that title?

 

Frank Salter: Well, what began it was I received a 6,000 word email, in effect from my co-author Harry Richardson. And he said:

 

“I’ve got an idea for an article.”

 

We thought it would be maybe about that long, 6,000 words. It went to almost ten times that.

 

And he had this argument, which is the structure of the book, which is talking about everyone else can have their home country but not us. Anglo Australians and all other European nations are not permitted to have their own country where they remain the super majority. Not just a 51% majority, but an 85, a 90% majority, which most other peoples aspire to. They might not have it, but they aspire to it. They can lobby for it, they can agitate for it and they’re not called Nazis. Right?

 

So territory is homeland is a basic one, or control of immigration and so on and so forth.

 

And I thought this is rhetorically really powerful.

 

So between us, his concept of the book became a book project, took us a year. And with my academic training together, it was a great combination. And we came up with this book that I think covers a lot of the sensitive areas.

 

Damien Richardson: The book was only recently published, wasn’t it?

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, earlier this year [2023]

 

Damien Richardson: Earlier this year. How’s it been received in academic circles and also by the broader public?

 

Frank Salter: Not one review! It’s just been ignored, except on the dissident side of politics. It’s dissident Right. It’s been acknowledged, been reviewed. It was published initially in Quadrant magazine, which is Australia’s premiere intellectual magazine for conservatives. Quadrant magazine’s been running for 50, 60 years.

 

So it was published in a huge, you know, series, four long articles with other part of the book.

 

So that was good. And we had good responses from readers there.

 

But in academe, no, I think I can’t think of one review.

 

Damien Richardson: So why is it being ignored? Talk us through that process. Why would it be ignored? You have fine credentials, you worked overseas, as part of academia as well as in Australia, as well as your colleague, so why would it be ignored?

 

Frank Salter: Well, for the same reason that I could not find a job in Australia! I had to work overseas at a research Institute in Europe for 20 years. I couldn’t find work in Australia. Why? Because my field of study, it’s not Right-wing or anything, but I study human nature and how that underpins political systems.

 

So I’m a political scientist trained at Sydney University, PhD, Griffith University in Brisbane. My doctoral dissertation was published by Oxford University Press. You can’t do better than that. And my supervisor, [chuckling] my Professor said:

 

“You’ve got it. You’re home and hosed, Frank. You’re home and hosed! This is it!”

 

I mean, if Oxford publishes your PhD dissertation, you can just sort of name your position. It’s great!

 

No chance! I had just no chance. And for that same reason, the book is just ignored. Books on the Right are just ignored.

 

Damien Richardson: So it proves your thesis in many respects, doesn’t it?

 

Frank Salter: It does. It does!

 

Damien Richardson: And what is your thesis?

 

Frank Salter: That there’s been a Cultural Revolution which became manifest, it started earlier, but it became manifest in the 1960s with the student rebellions across the West. And then went through the 1970s. It’s called the Counterculture. I mean, it was pretty easy to notice. And it was called a Cultural Revolution, but it went much deeper.

 

And what it reflected was a change in cultural elites right through the West’s history and the history of other countries. Their intellectual elites have reflected, have belonged to the people, they’ve been part of the people, they’ve come from the people often, and they haven’t critiqued or sought to tear down the basic society, the structure of society and so on.

 

They’ve actually been loyal to it, although critical here and there, of course, being intellectuals got to be critical of something, I suppose. But they wouldn’t want to tear down the whole structure. That changed.

 

Now there’s a literature on this. Eric Kaufman, for example, his 2004 book, The Rise and Fall of Anglo America. Eric Kaufman, still alive, valuable colleague, Harvard University Press. This is mainstream academy.

 

And he pointed out that by the 1950s, the cosmopolitan Left had captured elite American universities. The American university system at the top, not the bottom of it. There is like two or 3,000 American universities, most of them low powered two year colleges. But the elite ones, Princeton, Harvard and the big state systems, those universities were in effect captured by the late 1950s.

 

Ten years later, you have the student uprising, hating America, hating its history, hating their ancestors! Which really peaked in the 1970s. And people look back and they think:

 

“Oh, yeah, that’s interesting. But it’s gone now.”

 

No, it’s not gone! The rebels are now Professors! The rebels became the Professors. The rebels change the curriculum so that our school system now in Australia, this trickled down to Australia, because all these academic disciplines are global.

 

So you have the Society for Political Science, for example, has international connections. They’re all linked.

 

[07:15]

 

Damien Richardson: As a result of our connection to the US Empire, because we’re part of that empire, a suzerain, I would say of the American empire, and as a result, that Civil Rights Movement that you talk about, that really took hold in the sixties, then we got it, by Corollary, to just to maintain, to be part of that empire. Is that right?

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, I think there is a connection, but it’s deeper than that there are civilizational connections. So Australia was traditionally connected with Britain, and Britain had the peak academic bodies, and then Australian universities would hire them.

 

Now, as we matured, we trained up our own academics. Fine. But any serious scientific or academic discipline will be global, will be international, because it doesn’t matter who comes up with an idea. It can be black skinned, White skin, could be Asian, could be whatever. If it’s truth, it’s truth! If it’s science, it’s science! So these disciplines are fundamentally international in their outlook.

 

And so when you have dominant metropolitan powers, such as Britain during its Empire days or America during its empire days, it has tremendous ability to capture that, to influence the overall flavor of disciplines and also of culture.

 

So America also was a major, the global major exporter of popular culture, Hollywood, musical culture, and so on.

 

And part of that, Britain became part of that power structure. So these ideas flowed down. So Australian, for example, Australian immigration policy has roughly remained in sync with American immigration policy.

 

So America opened its doors to third world immigration in 1965, a piece of legislation which dismantled what they had in place, which basically forged, made America what it was, which is an extension of European civilization. 1965, that was dismantled. In Australia, it was 1969.

 

So there’s been a rough correspondence.

 

Why? Because these trends are international. And it’s not just because of who is currently in power in America. It’s deeper than that it’s more Deep State. It’s more Deep State, or establishment power involved.

 

Damien Richardson: Yeah, because it’s not party political then, is it at all? Because the 69 would have been a Liberal prime minister in Australia.

 

Frank Salter: Exactly!

 

Damien Richardson: [Harold] Holt. Yes, to brought about this cultural change.

 

Frank Salter: Exactly! So it began mildly, and then it became more and more radical, and you had Whitlam. And already Whitlam’s 72 to 75 were his years. Already he introduced political multiculturalism as the official ideology, which from then on, more and more governed immigration policy and also domestic ethnic policy.

 

Who’s on top? What is the ethnic hierarchy? Well, it wasn’t us on top anymore, I can tell you! [chuckling] It flipped the hierarchy to be minority centric!

 

Damien Richardson: So the White Anglo Saxon Protestant was on top previous to this cultural shift. You’re saying that occurred post Second World War?

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, and this was the case from the beginning. The Australian immigration policy made Australia. It forged what we are, our basic identity, which is at its heart, its Anglo, but in the broader sense of being Western civilization and so on.

 

So it encompasses Irish, encompasses Scottish, and goes beyond the British Isles to people from a broad European background.

 

Now, we had a shock to the system in the mid-19th century during the gold rushes, when there was, for a time, unrestricted Chinese immigration. And the Chinese being what they are, hardworking, studious, and they went overseas. There was a gold rush. Why wouldn’t they? But it didn’t work out culturally. It was a disaster, actually, culturally! And that really shocked the six colonies because several of them had their own gold rushes at different times. It was a shock!

 

And so when the Federation movement began in the 1890s and then culminated in 1901 with the Commonwealth being created, the first piece of legislation, the first was the Restrictive Immigration Act. That was the first, the most important thing that they had on the table. And they said:

 

“Well, obviously, we must have, …”

 

The point wasn’t, as the Left would say:

 

“Oh, it’s Anglo supremacism!”

 

The point was assimilation. That was the point! The point was to bring people in who would readily assimilate.

 

And in the great speeches leading up to Federation and immediately after Federation, they pointed at the United States as a negative example of where not to go if you want to have a cohesive country. They pointed to the civil war. They pointed to slavery, the terrible conflict over freeing the black slaves. And this terrible conflict, which killed 600,000 Americans, it was. Tore America apart during the civil war in the 1860s. And they said:

 

“We don’t want that!”

 

So they were determined. So Australian immigration policy can be taken back, actually taken back, right to Arthur Phillips, the first governor, or Hunter immediately after him. When it was put to him:

 

“Listen, we need more women. Let’s bring in some women from the Pacific islands, from the South Pacific. We can find lots of women there!”

 

And [chuckling] he said:

 

“No, I think we’ll do it ourselves. I think we can bring women.”

 

If he’d made a different decision, our history would be different. We’d now be a different people.

 

Damien Richardson: We’ll be paying a lot more reparations to another group of people, too. [chuckling] At this particular point in time.

 

That Restrictive Immigration Act that you’re talking about now is, there’s no subtlety or no understanding of where it’s actually come from historically, like you’ve just talked us through. It’s just used, it’s weaponized now against the nation as just being inherently “racist” from its inception.

 

Frank Salter: Exactly! And what is not taught is that this goes back to some pretty wise people contributed to that policy. My favorite, I have two favorites. One is the great English scholar, what was his name? John Stuart Mill. The father of liberalism, by the way.

 

Damien Richardson: On liberty. Yes.

 

Frank Salter: Yeah. And the father of women’s rights. He wrote the first major essay on saying:

 

“This is outrageous, that women don’t have the vote!”

 

And so on.

 

So he was a really fundamental pioneer of liberalism. He wrote another book that the Left never talks about, [chuckling] which was called On Nationality. I think it was called On Nationality. And he said:

 

“You know, if you want to have a cohesive country, you need to have it formed from people of the same background.”

 

And you put it differently. He approached it from the point of view of individual rights, which you’d expect a liberal to do. What would a person with liberty choose? And he said:

 

“If you just look at the world, what people choose to do is live among their own kind. They choose that.”

 

And by the way, that’s true in Australia, now! It’s true in every multicultural society. You get people clustering! Clustering together! Not because they’re whipped there, but because they choose! They want it. They live among comfortable people.

 

Now, as intermarriage happens, that blurs, of course, and you get integration happening. But sometimes you don’t get integration happening. Like the American racial scene is a disaster! Because the intermarriage rate between black and white, it’s there, but it’s very low, at a very low standard.

 

Damien Richardson: So you talk about these things. What explains the inconsistencies? Because I think of many instances now, like India seems to remain predominantly Indian. There seems to be no problem with that. I guess they would point to the British Raj and they would use that as an excuse to say, you know:

 

“Look what happened when we let you guys in.”

 

Japan remains ostensibly Japanese.

 

And of course, the nation state you’re not allowed to talk about is made as ethnocentric as Israel, and that seems to maintain its ethnic identity without a problem.

 

So why is it a problem, as you outline right from the get go, that a White nation cannot identify itself as being such? Where’s that inconsistency coming from, that hypocrisy?

 

[16:43]

 

Frank Salter: I’m not sure, I’m not sure.

 

But this is a field of academic research that’s ongoing. I’m not sure, but I have some insights, I think. Some facts we can point at.

 

To begin with, multiculturalism is a “mongrel theory” or is a “mongrel movement”. I’m using that term advisedly, because we’ll call it an unholy alliance between the far-Left, radical, (((cosmopolitan))) Left.

 

On the one side. And they’re the master, the power center.

 

But they have as clients, minorities, typically immigrant minorities, but sometimes indigenous minorities. That’s the truth in Australia as well.

 

So multiculturalism is a combine of the far-Left and the far tribal Right, but limited to minorities.

 

Now how can such contradiction hold together? And the reason it holds together is they have a common enemy. Who’s that? It’s us! It’s Western nations who have brought in immigrants. And it’s based on a partly on a Marxist, fundamental Marxist critique of the West, of Western nations. Globalists and globalism is a strong thread in this. Globalism is opposed to borders per se. It’s opposed to identity, religious, cultural, ethnic, it’s opposed to all that it’s saying:

 

“It’s the brotherhood of man and sisterhood of mankind, utopia.”

 

So the utopia is:

 

“Oh, we’ll have a world government, and once we’ve had that, and once everyone’s mixed together and no borders, no more war! War will go! We won’t have any more war!”

 

So you have Mr Brown, the ex-head of the Australian Greens, for example, has been repeatedly calling for a “Global government”.

 

Damien Richardson: Yes

 

Frank Salter: Without thinking:

 

“What is in the interests of the Australian people?”

 

And the last thing we want is a global government elected on proportional representation.

 

Because if I lived in the third world, the first thing I would vote for is stripping Australia of its wealth and spreading it across, around the third world.

 

Of course, of course that’s what I want.

 

These Western societies, not all Western. Japan has done the same. South Korea has done the same. So Singapore has done the same. Have created a law governed basically with human rights, civil rights, tremendously wealthy, generous welfare systems. These are attractive societies. And other people are naturally they’re envious. They’re envious of that. And they want to be there if they can. Many of them want to be there.

 

I think a figure of something close to a billion people around the world want to move to the West, that would like to move to a Western country.

 

Damien Richardson: It’s an impossibility, isn’t it?

 

Frank Salter: No! It’s absolutely possible!

 

Damien Richardson: To have a billion people move to the West and for it to maintain its sense of self.

 

Frank Salter: Oh, you’ve added, you’ve added some conditions there! Yeah. Absolutely agree with you. It’s impossible if one wants to preserve the West.

 

But if you set that aside, as our cultural elites do, because our elites are not., … Our elites are, in effect, hostile. I think they’re more cold than hostile. They just don’t care. They don’t have a sense of identity.

 

There’s a great book written in Britain about ten years ago called The Somewheres and the Anywheres, that the fundamental divide in politics is between people who identify with the local.

 

Damien Richardson: Yes

 

Frank Salter: Identify as Australians or poms, or they identify as Germans or Hungarians or Chinese or whatever it might be.

 

And then you have this very small (((elite))), the 1% who could be anywhere.

 

[20:49]

 

Damien Richardson: Cosmopolitan, urban elite, internationalist in their understanding of place and location. Yeah.

 

Frank Salter: Exactly! And they send their children to whatever, international schools. And they’re so wealthy these people, are typically billionaires, or with wealth in the hundreds of millions. But not only they are financially secure, not only their children are financially secure, as the money trickles down, their grandchildren and great grandchildren will be financially secure! So they feel, and they live in gated suburbs. The children go to private elite schools.

 

So these are the modern citizens of the world. Basically they don’t care about anyone.

 

Damien Richardson: So it’s a new feudalism, isn’t it? It’s a new feudalistic class!

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, absolutely! So it’s becoming a mainstream view in the United States political science discipline, now that America has not been a democracy for quite some time. It’s a plutocracy.

 

Damien Richardson: And you talk about the Civil Rights Movement, you talk about it coming to Australia, particularly born in the US and coming to Australia around 69. Harold Holt is the so-called conservative prime minister, Liberal [Party] at the time.

 

So is democracy a shame? Is it just, there’s a bureaucratic global elite that is actually in control? It makes absolutely no difference who you would vote for, it’s just window dressing. It’s just a pretense to democracy, because it’s going to dominate no matter what this urban global elite want to happen. And it’s rolling out, as you say, rightly, across the West. It doesn’t matter who’s in power?

 

Frank Salter: I think there’s a lot of truth in that. I wouldn’t go that far, but I’m in that direction. I think that it’s getting that way. For example, it does matter who we vote for. There’s Left globalists and there’s Right globalists. The Right globalists are these very wealthy billionaires and so on.

 

The Left globalists are the Marxist, neo-Marxian, utopian thinkers. So it does matter who you vote for.

 

For example, just to give one recent example, in Australia, if one voted Labor, if Labour had continued to rule from Keating [Paul-Labor Party] on, the boats would not have been stopped. Labor was slow to drag themselves kicking and screaming to the realization:

 

“We must stop the boat people.”

 

Howard [John-Liberal Party], to his credit, to stopped that. Howard still in effect, a globalist, though. Because the legal immigration policy was flooding Australia, creating all these minority communities that didn’t have to be there. So he was a disaster for Australia! But a disaster of a different kind to Labor. You see what I mean?

 

Damien Richardson: But the trajectory was still the same. There was still an increase in net immigration to Australia under Howard from what had happened previously. You even say under Keating.

 

Frank Salter: Exactly! And what’s missing in all these policy areas is the “majority founding nation perspective”.

 

So that is blocked out in the West. By the way, not in India, where the Hindu nationalists have been ruling for many years now with Modi as their prime minister. Not in China, which has realized that Marxism is just rubbish and they’re moving to legitimize their rule, rather dictatorial rule, with ethno-nationalism.

 

Damien Richardson: Is it a National Socialist country, China?

 

Frank Salter: Yeah!

 

Damien Richardson: With the Han Chinese as the pre-eminent, …

 

Frank Salter: Yeah. The problem with using a term like that is you conjure up Nazi Germany and it gets, you know, it confuses the issue. But one might argue, technically they’re National Socialists. But that term itself is loaded. It has a lot of baggage. But they’re an ethnic nationalist, authoritarian government.

 

And Australia is not forming its immigration policy according to what they are. Australia’s immigration policy is being conducted as if we know nothing about ethnicity or nationalism! As if we know nothing! We know a lot! The social sciences have come a long way.

 

We know, for example, that ethnocultural, especially religious as well, diversity is negative. There are serious costs to social cohesion and to economic growth of diversity! But you wouldn’t know that if you look at Australian government policy, you wouldn’t know that they talk about the “joy of diversity”. They talk about “diversity as our strength”. That’s a complete lie! That’s a complete lie!

 

We know diversity is costly. And in the end, it lowers the threshold to civil war.

 

So there have been illustrious studies done by political scientists, have shown again and again, diversity is a risk factor for civil war, for breakdown and so on.

 

Civil conflict!

 

Damien Richardson: I’ve heard some people say that that’s potential for the US in particular, for there to be Civil War 2.0. Is that something you could envision happening?

 

Frank Salter: Well, it’s absolutely horrific if it happened! A way to approach it from a Political Science perspective would be the break-up of the United States. Is the United States heading in the direction of a break-up? And it is in that direction.

 

But I think there are tremendous barriers to a real civil war getting underway.

 

But its heading in that direction. For example, and it’s not just America. Around the West, trust in the government is just collapsing. Trust in the major political parties is falling away.

 

So in Australia, the major political parties have never enjoyed a lower, never had a lower support from the population. All these minor parties popping up, right. People are just losing confidence, losing trust in the government. I think belatedly. They should have lost his trust 50 years ago when it became obvious that the nation was no longer favored by the broader political system. Instead, minorities are being favored.

 

[27:25]

 

Damien Richardson: But it’s an impossibility to lose faith in it because what can you do? There’s a compulsory voting system and if you don’t vote, you’re outside of the system anyway.

 

So the system still continues on as a result. Because through the two party preferred system, it’s almost an impossibility to bring about any realistic change. And because weaponization of the media, of the corporate media, it won’t allow any voices to operate outside of the very particular Overton Window it creates.

 

That’s why your book is being ignored. And that’s why this conversation we’re having now, if it was to ever gain any mainstream traction, we would be dismissed as being “fascists”!

 

Frank Salter: I think you’re wrong, … Luckily! I think you’re wrong, gladly!

 

Damien Richardson: Yeah.

 

Frank Salter: What you just said is based on a lot of unfortunate facts.

 

But there’s another side to it. That the solution is not political, it’s cultural. Because what we’re suffering is the downstream effect of a Cultural Revolution in the sixties and seventies. So it’s cultural.

 

Next we have the Internet. So technological change has made it more and more difficult for elites to monopolize the means of cultural production and distribution against Marxism.

 

Damien Richardson: And that’s a real concern to them. That’s what their Misinformation, Disinformation Bill’s about, I’m sure.

 

Frank Salter: Absolutely, absolutely!

 

Now, one thing that’s fascinating is the closer we, especially the Anglo-sphere, comes to the majority being demographically submerged, so we can’t fight back politically because we’ll be in the minority. In America, it’s in 20 years time. 20 years time, they’re predicted to be minority White.

 

And Australia, we keep such poor records, it’s not difficult to know what the ethnic proportions are. But we’re on a similar track, I’d say maybe a bit longer. In Britain, it’s not as bad.

 

What’s strange is that the closer we get to that submergence and that final defeat, the more totalitarian the establishment’s becoming. We get these draconian laws coming in! With these so-called, it’s ironic, “Human Rights Commissions”! It’s quite ironic, Human Rights Commission. What are they there for?

 

Basically to crush the free speech of the majority! They’re essentially an anti-free speech organization!

 

Damien Richardson: Or the anti-White, aren’t they, in their underpinnings?

 

Frank Salter: Especially White! Especially White. They’re there to crush!

 

So why is that? Why are they becoming more draconian? And how can it be that every major social media company was on the side of, for example, the Covid lockdowns? They censored anyone, any Dissident Voices saying:

 

“Oh, hold on, what about the antivirals? Couldn’t we use it? Just use well tested antiviral?”

 

“No, no! You’re a terrorist! You’re a denier!”

 

You know, why is it happening now? And I don’t know why. But just to speculate. It could be that because they have the power, they’re doing it.

 

But that doesn’t explain. Elon Musk is a standout because he’s taken over Twitter time now. He’s taken it over and he wants more free speech in that area.

 

But why is he a standout? Why aren’t social media companies across the political spectrum? What you would expect. Some on the left, some on the Right, some of the most clustering in the middle. No, they’re all on the cosmopolitan Left! Censoring patriots, censoring people with different views on Covid or whatever the topic might be. How can that work?

 

Damien Richardson: Elon Musk is in a battle at the moment, isn’t he? With the ADL, the Anti-Defamation League, which is a jewish organization. And they’ve really gone after Musk because he’s opened up the people that can now engage with his social media platform, Twitter, now known as X. Platform X. That’s a really seminal fight, isn’t it? That’s a fight I would have never seen happening, even four or five years ago. That someone would take on the power of something like the Anti-Defamation League.

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, I prefer to call it the “DL”. The Defamation League. That’s what they define, destroy people’s careers and lives. They’re basically a hate group. ADL is a hate group!

 

Damien Richardson: That’s what they do now, isn’t it? They weaponize, … Take away your livelihood, …

 

Frank Salter: People don’t realize, that, for example, the de-banking movement, who was it? The, who’s the who’s the politician in the UK was just de-banked?

 

Damien Richardson: Oh, yeah, Nigel Farage.

 

Frank Salter: Yeah.

 

Frank Salter: But he’s just the latest.

 

Damien Richardson: He’s the tip of the iceberg as someone, that one that they’re willing to actually talk about. But there’s others have been de-banked, including Australian dissidents, for many years before now.

 

Frank Salter: One might not agree with their politics, but it’s typically on the Right. They don’t debank (((cosmopolitans))), they don’t debank people on the left, they don’t debank feminists, LGBTQI plus, whatever it might be! No, no! They wouldn’t be de-banked. It’s only patriots and people on the Right. Others on the Right.

 

But about the ADL, they’re not much of a jewish organization anymore, I can tell you. They have in the leadership, there’s severe criticizms of Israel. From their cosmopolitan perspective. Israel does not really have a right to exist as a jewish state. And if it’s not a jewish state, it’s really the whole Zionist mission has been frustrated. So Israel is also suffering from., … And it’s ironic because there’s a jewish contingent on the left. I understand that. But they’re often not friendly to Israel at all!

 

Damien Richardson: Jonathan Greenblatt heads it, doesn’t he?

 

[33:36]

 

Frank Salter: Jonathan Greenblatt! He’s no great friend of Israel, if you ask me. I don’t see that.

 

So they’ve become rogue in a way. They were initially a jewish organization, but they’ve become rogue. They’re not really friendly to Israel. Israel can only survive by controlling its borders, its immigration policy, for example. And making sure that they have a super majority within the country, not 100% majority, but a large majority.

 

The same thing goes for Hungary, for China, for Australia, for any country! If the state does not reflect the interests of the majority. Protecting minority rights, of course, that’s liberal democracy. You protect everyone’s individual rights. But group rights should be protected. The majority founding group should be protected, it seems to me.

 

And that’s what’s changed in Australia and America and Britain and across the West. The state apparatus has, since the 1970s, say, not supported the interests of the majority.

 

Now that’s an incredible statement! Because what would you expect in a democracy? Rule of the majority! With minority rights protected. That makes it a liberal democracy, not just democracy. Democracy can be savage, democracy can be unpleasant.

 

But if you have liberal democracy, you have individual rights protected constitutionally and legally. Separated, …

 

Damien Richardson: Equality under the rule of law. Equality under the rule of law.

 

Frank Salter: But that doesn’t mean that you can ignore the interests of the majority. Then it’s not even democratic anymore!

 

So this is what’s happened. And we need to somehow take back our countries and find a way to reverse this Cultural Revolution that’s occurred, where that has given us hostile elites!

 

Damien Richardson: How can that happen? How could it happen that the majority would be subsumed by a minority and the minority would have a whip hand, morally end up having a whip hand? It’s only because of the compliance of the majority, isn’t it?

 

So somehow it’s been weaponized against us through the institutions, particularly through education, where you feel a sense of guilt. They pick on Australia particularly and probably get to talking about The Voice debate that’s upon at the moment. The guilt that we’re given for our inhabitation of this landmass in the first place.

 

But somehow anyone that comes post Second World War is okay. They’re forgiven for inhabiting the land mass, but those with any antecedents before the Second World War are not forgiven.

 

Frank Salter: Exactly! And it’s universal.

 

So when I was living in Europe, my colleagues in Europe couldn’t believe. They said:

 

“Yeah. But France is especially evil because we had the we had the empire!”

 

Damien Richardson: Yes.

 

Frank Salter: Or the Germans would say:

 

“No, no, no! You’re okay. But we had the Holocaust in World War Two!”

 

And I said to them:

 

“Guys, you’re not special! We’re all in the same boat. In Australia we have the Aborigines, we have this. We were colonialists and we had the White Australia Policy! The White Australia Policy!”

 

And they looked at me, and I said:

 

“You’re not special. Every country, the majority, is demonized!”

 

Now, how can that be? Is Europe such an evil place, that uniquely evil? All the European countries must be replaced by other people! That’s the implication.

 

Damien Richardson: And that’s why the other people want to go there in the first place! Because inherently evil, that they can’t wait to get out of their own country and come potentially to start a new life with more prosperity in a Western democracy.

 

Frank Salter: That’s right. That’s right. I don’t know the answer to all this, but there are some strange things happening. You ask me how? Well, I can give some micro information on that.

 

For example, let’s consider, say, two prime ministers, Malcolm Fraser [Liberal Party PM 1975 to 1983] and Bob Hawke [Labor Party PM 1983 to 1991], absolutely instrumental in installing multiculturalism against the wishes of the Australian people.

 

Whenever the Australian people were polled:

 

“Would you want more Asian immigration?”

 

Or whatever it might be. And they said:

 

“Well, no, we’d actually prefer to remain who we are, actually.”

 

There was no great hatred involved, just normal human ethnocentrism! Ethnocentrism is an adaptive psychological state. It’s where you’re self regarding. You like your own children, doesn’t mean you hate other children. You just like you care mostly for your own children and for your own family.

 

And then it goes out to your neighbors and so on to your nation. It doesn’t mean you hate other people.

 

And if you don’t think that way, you can’t invest in anyone!

 

Because if you’re giving to the world, what does that mean actually, to give money to the world? It means nothing! It’s incredibly, incredibly selfish, in fact! Because you give to no one!

 

So Bob Hawke once admitted in an interview, he said:

 

“Look, it would have been impossible to establish multiculturalism, a nation, of non-White immigration, if both parties had not co-operated.”

 

Cooperation of the parties, a bipartisan policy. Before him, Malcolm Fraser, who many on the left see as some sort of hard Right figure. The guy was a, in effect, a neo-Marxist! He was a traitor to his class. He was a traitor to his country, in effect.

 

And he wrote in his memoirs, he said:

 

“I don’t believe the Australian people should be permitted to vote on immigration, because they always get it wrong! They just get it wrong! They get it wrong! Why can’t they be like me?”

 

Bob Hawke came along and gave us a famous speech, the Bicentenary. The tall ships are about to sail into Sydney Harbour, right? 200 years since 1788. So 26 January, the prime minister of the country stands up and gives this great speech and he said:

 

“There is no ethnic hierarchy in Australia. How do we define an Australian? There’s no ethnic hierarchy.”

 

“Ethnic hierarchy”, hat’s a really ugly, loaded term. What he meant was, what is Australian identity? And he said:

Damien Richardson: Unusual! Not a great cohort. Not a huge cohort. [chuckling]

 

Frank Salter: And say he falls in love with The Country Doctor, with A Country Practice, or whatever it might be.

 

Damien Richardson: Oh, yes, yes, yes, sir.

 

Frank Salter: Just imagine that. And he thinks:

 

“Wow, what a great country! I feel a real commitment to Australia!”

 

According to our prime minister, he’s an Australian. But contrast him with an Australian who’s not happy with some area of our policy, like our stance towards immigration laws.

 

Damien Richardson: Say, for example, … [chuckling]

 

Frank Salter: A lot of Australians are unhappy with current policy. And Bob Hook might say:

 

“Well, you’re not an Australian. You’re not an Australian! You don’t feel a commitment to Australia!”

 

But the person from Inner Mongolia is an Australian.

 

So the reason I’m reminded of this speech, because I hate to admit that I was alive at the time, but sees.

 

Damien Richardson: So was I Very young. Very young.

 

Frank Salter: [chuckling] Yeah. An interview given by John Howard recently, like three weeks ago, in which he referred to that speech and said:

 

“Yeah, everything he said was true.”

 

So John Howard did not have the intellectual nous to think this through for himself.

 

Now, how can that be? Well, the problem with this sort of micro approach of looking at this little example and what he said and what she said, is that it can miss the big picture.

 

The big picture is that every prime minister since Gough Whitlam [Labor Party PM 1972 to 1975] has basically been minority centric, has put minorities first, for example, in immigration policy. Every one! They can’t all have had bad character. It can’t be:

 

“Yeah, but he was selfish or he was nasty or he was a recovering alcoholic or he was haughty!”

 

No! There must be some systemic reason for it. There must be some, … And it’s to do with the Cultural Revolution. Again, it comes back to culture.

 

Damien Richardson: And it comes back to that globalist enterprise that we talked about earlier on. And it comes back to legacy for people that particularly say, Howard, for example, who got into so much trouble over the apology, etcetera, refused to apologize. Indigenous people turning their backs, painted in the media very much as being a racist, etcetera. Now think of his legacy. His legacy will be painted within the apparatus of state, which demands a multiethnic understanding of the West!

 

Frank Salter: Yeah.

 

So, I mean, if a politician wants to survive and work his or her way up through a major political party, there’s going to be screening, screening, along the lines you just stated. And if they get it wrong too often, they’ve got no future. They’ve got no future.

 

Damien Richardson: Well, they have no future within the political structure itself. It’s very clever, because there’s someone, you’ll have a colleague that can use it and weaponize it against you, to get rid of you as a potential opponent within the apparatus, whether it’s the Liberal Party, Labor Party, Greens, wherever, it makes no difference.

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, yeah. It’s a savage system!

 

Now, this can’t be explained without understanding the role of the media. The media have been very important. That’s why there’s such battles going on now, like Musk taking over Twitter and so on, we were discussing.

 

So this is another aspect that is not fully explained from my point of view. But the facts are there, that without the co-operation of the mainstream media, which began as just newspapers. The mainstream media was once just newspapers and there were very few universities, this sort of thing with that level of book reading and so on.

 

So it was the newspapers. And then you got newspapers and radio. And the newspapers, radio and television from the 1940s, fifties on. Why were they on side with this?

 

Well, one, from that theory of corporatism, corporate globalism, it sort of makes sense, that the big media companies were all bought by large global corporations.

 

Damien Richardson: They’re owned by them, they’re an extension of them, they’re an arm of them.

 

Frank Salter: I think the solution is going to be in that direction of corporate ownership and so on.

 

And this is why we’re having such turmoil right now, because the Internet has upset that power structure. To some extent.

 

Damien Richardson: To some extent. Because you get banned off the Internet very, very readily, very quickly.

 

Frank Salter: Exactly! And they began to look for ways to control access to the Internet from an early, … They realized this was a danger to them, and they began looking for ways of controlling that.

 

So again, along this line, which is sort of neo-Marxist, by the way, it’s sort of focusing on economic processes. So they began looking at that and buying up the major media companies, the major social media companies, I mean, big tech and so on.

 

So, the example of Musk is the exception that proves a rule. The example of these thousands upon thousands of small scale media, … Oh, such as yourself. You’re using this medium to get around this censorship and so on.

 

They’re the exceptions that sort of prove the rule, in a way.

 

Damien Richardson: Musk is an interesting figure, isn’t he? Because he wants to neuro link us all, he wants to microchip humanity.

 

Frank Salter: Well, I don’t know whether he likes to, but he’s got this corporation that’s working in that direction.

 

[46:19]

 

Damien Richardson: I’ll just say we’ve been here before, haven’t we? Like as a culture, Australia, there was a huge antipathy between Protestantism and Catholicism. Catholics need not apply for government jobs for a long period of time. Somehow we’ve seemed to have moved to a point beyond that. Is it a possibility. Like:

 

“Oh, what are we talking about with this? Because Australia is a multi-ethnic state now, you can’t unbake the souffle.”

 

Is there a possibility for us to move forward as a cohesive entity? Are you saying that demands a predominantly Anglo population and therefore that’s the defining identity of that community?

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, my approach is different. And in Anglo-phobia book, the position we take in that is the reality is, as you say, we have a diverse Australia, so that’s the reality. So Australia after World War Two 98 percent Anglo-Celtic. Was 98%. There was some lingering friction between the Irish Catholics and the Protestants, yes, and so on.

 

But that’s largely been overcome. Perhaps not in the New South Wales Labor Right, but it’s still largely overcome. That’s not the case anymore. So we’ve been diversified.

 

Now, because the nation is so diverse, one can’t talk about a single united interest always applying in Australia.

 

So, for example, in immigration policy, one might argue immigration policy should reflect the interests of the nation as a whole. Okay? That sounds noble. That sounds noble, and I support that.

 

But also, it’s difficult to have immigration policy without it favoring one group over another.

 

So, for example, every group wants access from its own group. Chinese, Australians, we don’t want discrimination against Chinese immigrants, Burmese, Greek, whatever it might be. Well, they can’t all be pleased! Unless we have an open door policy. We have an open door policy, it’s suicide for Australia! But if we do begin to restrict it, well, however we do restrict, it’s going to favor one group over another.

 

So what I think is necessary as a starting position is for Anglo Australians. And that’s a very broad category. It’s very broad. Anyone who’s assimilating into the mainstream Australian identity is for them to say, what about us? What about us? All these policies, multiculturalism, open door immigration policy has been formulated without our input!

 

In fact, the result of opinion polls, have just been ignored! They’ve just been ignored. There’s willful ignoring of Anglo interests in Australia!

 

And I think if Anglos are brought into the multicultural system, which theoretically is Democratic and fair, theoretically, multiculturalism says:

 

“Well, people should be able to express their own interests.”

 

Damien Richardson: Yeah

 

Frank Salter: That sounds reasonable. People should be able to vote and lobby according to their own interests and the interests of their religious or cultural community. Yes, that seems fair. Why shouldn’t they be able to do that?

 

But in reality, that’s not, … In reality, they say:

 

“Yes for all, except one, the Australian majority, except one group, can’t talk!”

 

Damien Richardson: But as you say, it’s happening globally, it’s happening in Europe and it’s happening in the US, it’s happening in New Zealand, I’m sure Canada here. Is it a fantasy in some respects, what you’re suggesting? Because power is power, and power will need an enemy, and power will vilify whoever it’s taking its power from. And now globalist structure is taking power from those former holders of that power, which is those communities, those Anglo Saxon, Celtic, western European communities.

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, look, I think the reality is we have oligopoly. We are an oligopoly globally. Rule of the rich, the rule of the powerful, of the elite. But we can’t stop resisting! We can’t stop resisting! Democracy was born going back to Magna Carta and so on.

 

Democracy was born by little people finding their champion, like the Catholic Church. The church in Britain helped Magna Carta in 1215. So different elites said:

 

“Yeah, we also have a problem with the King, with absolute power of the King.

 

We also have a problem with making rules up as he goes along. So we want rule of law.”

 

This sort of thing. So it’s always a struggle. It’s always a struggle. And we’ve had it so good in Australia and other Anglophone countries for so long that it’s been just taken. Taken for granted:

 

“Oh, yeah, it’s a free country!”

 

When I was a little boy, you say:

 

“You can’t do that!”

 

“It’s a free country!”

 

It was a free country. By historical comparison, the freest countries that have ever existed. But that had only come about through struggle, through fighting for our rights.

 

And now we’re technologically equipped with the Internet and so on, to establish our own parallel institutions, which I think is a very important movement taking place. And why not, in principle, create or influence our own banks? Banks that do stand by freedom of speech and freedom of association.

 

Damien Richardson: Is that happening?

 

Frank Salter: It’s actually happening.

 

Damien Richardson: People are building their own banking institutions?

 

Frank Salter: That’s beginning. The example I’ve come across is, what’s that? An American social media website. I’m so sorry. It escaped my mind!

 

Damien Richardson: That’s okay.

 

Frank Salter: It’s a Christian website. And I hear that this is a trend, very slow, but it is happening. So the parallel institutions are being set up. Jordan Peterson. Someone as famous as people will have heard of Jordan Peterson. He’s setting up his own university.

 

Damien Richardson: Yes.

 

Frank Salter: And there’s more than him. It’s not just him. There are others doing this, because they realize universities are critical to our survival. The survival of freedom. Absolutely!

 

Damien Richardson: That’ll be co-opted by the power structure as it is now, won’t it, and give you the pretense of there being alternative? But the power source will not allow an alternative power source to exist.

 

[53:32]

 

Frank Salter: Not necessarily. Not necessarily. I wouldn’t be too black pilled about it. A great term. I wouldn’t be too black pilled.

 

Of course, that is a trend, and one should keep a sharp eye for that happening. Co-option, of course, but it doesn’t have to be that way. I think the key thing to do is to raise consciousness. To raise consciousness, people need to be aware of who they are, of where they came from, of their history.

 

And it’s very much like back in the early days of the Civil Rights Movement in America, when black agitators, blacks who wanted their people to have civil rights, normal citizen rights, talked about raising consciousness, talking about history. It’s okay to be black. We have our own history. We have our own interests. Don’t be put down by this hegemonic White structure.

 

Now, that’s going back 1910, 1920, when you had Jim Crow.

 

So there was, in fact, there was oppression of black America and the Civil Rights Movement reversed that.

 

So I think we should never give up the fight for freedom.

 

Damien Richardson: That Civil Rights Movement’s now been weaponized as against White majority populations, though, hasn’t it?

 

Frank Salter: It has, it has! But America being what it is, which is a rule of law country and a democracy, tremendous strides were made by black Americans overcoming Jim Crow. Many of them did it by simply migrating out of the south, and they moved to the big cities and the big industrial cities in the north. And amazing pioneers such as Henry Ford would employ anyone at the same wage, anyone! That’s why they flocked, for example, to Detroit and so on, New York and other places. And they used whatever strategy they could and they made great strides.

 

And so you had a black middle class developing, and you had their own newspapers. Very important black newspapers developed. So they’d receive reliable news about themselves and about their, …

 

Damien Richardson: From an ethnic perspective.

 

Frank Salter: From an ethnic perspective. And in that, …

 

Damien Richardson: It comes back to a race all the time, doesn’t it? We’re not allowed to talk about race, but it comes back to race all the time.

 

Frank Salter: Well, it’s not just race. It can be culture, it can be especially important, …

 

Damien Richardson: Well, that’s part of it, …

 

Frank Salter: But no, race is, … Religion’s not part of race. These are different ways to form communities. Ethnicity is important, but it’s not unique. It’s not the only, …

 

Damien Richardson: But I grew up in an Irish Catholic tradition and I was struck when I went to Spain how it was still Catholic, but it was very different culturally. It was very different culturally because of the mores of that community, which I would say did come down to how they interpreted it through race, through that Christian tradition.

 

Frank Salter: Did you just say that they interpreted it through Christian tradition?

 

Damien Richardson: They interpreted the same, ostensibly the same Christian tradition. Catholic, Christian. But I grew up in an Irish Catholic understanding interpretation of it, which was very different than the Spanish interpretation of it was.

 

Frank Salter: How did race come into that?

 

Damien Richardson: Well, I just say it would be their cultural, their racial understanding of who they are, how they express themselves. There is a bio-spirit to a Spanish community which is different than the bio-spirit of an Irish community.

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, yeah. Well, Irish in Australia formed its attitudes as a diaspora. In Spain they’re in their ancient homeland.

 

So that’s one difference. And also., …

 

Damien Richardson: Sure, but I’m sure if you went to Ireland, you would see there’ll be a huge difference between Irish Catholicism and Spanish Catholicism, even in their homeland.

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, it could be.

 

And I think one pointed aspect, let’s bring this religious aspect back to the topic, connect it even more closely. The pastoral duty of the Church is up for grabs. It’s been changing and I think being undermined for the last 70 years. The Catholic Church once respected and promoted the ethnic interests of its people.

 

So the Catholic Church has always cared for the individual. It’s cared for the family, very much. Right. It’s cared for the local, for the clan, the extended family, and it cared for the local community.

 

So, for example, if a city was being besieged by barbarians or by the neighboring nation, the city was being besieged. And behind its medieval wall, … You go, in Europe, they all had these medieval walls. The church was not saying:

 

“Open the Gates! It’s the brotherhood of mankind! Open up! We’re all the same. Everyone’s the same!”

 

Damien Richardson: But we’ve evolved now! We’ve evolved, Frank. We’ve evolved to a new point, a new man, a new understanding!

 

Frank Salter: What they said was:

 

“God is on your side and it’s right for you to defend your city against the barbarians or against the next city state. It’s right!”

 

And there was excesses in that direction, of course, but they were basically loyal.

 

And you can see that within the framework of the pastoral duty of the Church, which serves different layers of interests from individual to family to nation to ethnic group. That’s all gone now! There’s no pastoral duty by the mainstream church, by many minorities, but not the mainstream churches, especially my own, the Church of England, Anglicans. There’s no sense of pastoral duty to the nation.

 

Instead, they’ve adopted a minority centric perspective of critiquing! They’ve taken on board this critique of majority cultures, which is insane! It’s madness!

 

Damien Richardson: It’s part of the institutionalization of the West, isn’t it really? The same structures that controlling organized religion, as any other department we’ve already covered.

 

Frank Salter: And all these Bishops go through the same university system, by the way, they’re subject to the same indoctrination.

 

[1:00:21]

 

Damien Richardson: I just want to, because we could be here for another hour. It’s such an engrossing conversation. Clash of civilization. There’s so much going on.

 

But before we do, because I know soon we’ve got the vote in Australia for recognising an indigenous voice to Parliament and I know you’ve written an article on behalf of the British-Australian Community, which is your website as well, the BAC, I might add. What’s the name of the it’s actually a book you’ve written. What’s the name of the book?

 

Frank Salter: The book is The Voice to Parliament: A Statement on Behalf of the British-Australian Community by Frank Salter.

 

Damien Richardson: So, Frank, that’s a very countercultural thing to say, that a voice to Parliament should have a statement on behalf of the British-Australian community.

 

Can you just talk us through that? And what you see resulting in at the referendum on the 14th of this month.

 

Frank Salter: The one extraordinary thing about this whole Voice process, developing the referendum questions and all the rest of it, if you go back and look at the different deliberative bodies, the different consultative bodies, and so on, that were formed beginning in 2011, I think. 2011, 12.

 

Damien Richardson: Under Julie Gillard [Labor Party PM 2010 to 2013]. [chuckling]

 

Frank Salter: Under Julie Gillard. They have, of course, representatives of the indigenous people, Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders.

 

Of course they have people who are loyal members of those communities. Not only loyal members, but leaders of those local communities coming and saying:

 

“What’s in our interest? My people want this, we want this. These are our interests.”

 

Completely appropriate.

 

They had a lot of White supporters of those. Of those, also understandable.

 

They didn’t have one representative of the Anglo majority, not one! They had lots of Anglos, but they didn’t have one person who was there saying:

 

“I feel sympathy for the indigenous people, of course, I wouldn’t be here otherwise. But I represent the interests of Anglo Australia.”

 

Not one! And I’ve traced it back to 2011, 12. It’s extraordinary!

 

And so this whole thing has been formulated as if Anglo Australia is not in crisis! As if Anglo Australia is just still the boss and it’s a White run society. No, no! Since 1970, roughly, as we’ve been, as we were discussing earlier, immigration policy and multicultural policy has been run against the White majority! We’ve been marginalized! We’ve been vilified in the education! Our children are being vilified, are being taught to hate their own history, to hate their own ancestors. And now we’re being asked:

 

“Oh, you should vote for a special powers being given to an advisory body in the Constitution.”

 

Extraordinary! As if we don’t exist, as if we have no interests.

 

So I wrote this book, it’s a short book, looking at this systematically, looking at the whole Voice proposal from an Anglo perspective.

 

In other words, yes, I’m concerned about what’s good for Indigenous Australians, my fellow citizens, of course, but also keeping in the back of my mind, and is it good for the Anglos? And no one talks about that!

 

Damien Richardson: No reviews on that book either, I can imagine. [chuckling]

 

Frank Salter: The closest to it is Jacinta Price, who calls herself a Celtic indigenous person. A Celtic Aboriginal person, she proudly says:

 

“Well, my father has Celtic background.”

 

In other words, Anglo:

 

“And my mother is indigenous.”

 

So she comes closest to that. I think Warren Mundine also has talked about this.

 

Damien Richardson: It’s interesting, something I know. I read a chapter from the book and you talked about the dispossession of Anglo institutions. It’s really just such a counter cultural concept that Anglos might even feel like they are being dispossessed. Because what we hear all the time, of course, is that indigenous Australians were dispossessed.

 

Frank Salter: Yes, well, they were dispossessed. But then, luckily for them, though, they were integrated into a culture that was leading the world in forming liberal democracy.

 

So, you know, that Aboriginal, in most of Australia, Aboriginal men, because initially it was male male suffrage, they got the vote before Englishmen got it in England! Well, before! Like mid 19, mid 19th century that you had in New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Tasmania. Not Queensland, Queensland and Western Australia, as the frontier states were delayed, that was delayed.

 

But in most of Australia they got the vote before British men and women got it in Britain.

 

So it was good for them. But the dispossession that’s been taking place as a result of the Cultural Revolution of the sixties and seventies. I have a chapter called Our Stolen Commonwealth. Our stolen Commonwealth. And what do I mean by that?

 

Well, just what I’ve been saying, the Anglo nation. First the six Anglo colonies, and then they gave rise to the Commonwealth in 1901. They were set up explicitly to benefit the majority. These are Democratic societies, and they were overwhelmingly Anglo societies, so naturally they wanted to survive and continue their traditions and their identity.

 

The Commonwealth was set up explicitly to serve the interests of the nation, which was an Anglo nation. That was reversed by 1970! That was reversed! In effect the Commonwealth has been stolen from us, in effect, and it’s now operating against our interests.

 

And I define the Commonwealth not just as government institutions, but as the ABC, for example, SBS, public broadcasting. Since the late 1960s, …

 

Damien Richardson: All the institutions, I would say, Frank

 

Frank Salter: All major institutions, have joined this Deep State apparatus, and, in effect, they’re operating against the interests of the majority.

 

[1:07:27]

 

Damien Richardson: It’s interesting, and we’ve been going for a while, so I’ll try to wrap it up. But I saw a speech the other day by Noel Pearson at the Press Club, where he made this claim. And he spoke to “multicultural” Australia, meaning not “settler” Australia, and he called, quite deliberately, “settler Australia”, being those mob, he would say, from the UK. And he said to multicultural Australia:

 

“I want to ask you this question. Who do you side with in this debate, as far as The Voice is concerned, do you consider yourself going to be an honorary settler somehow? Because, I tell you, a lot of you are the wrong color.”

 

I couldn’t believe what I was hearing! He didn’t sort of get much opprobrium in the mainstream, because the mainstream would never want to be seen to criticize someone indigenous. And of that state stature. A man, too, has made himself a millionaire out of the largesse of taxpayers expense. It was an extraordinary claim to make. And really, if you start to boil it down, since he’s asked the question, I would say:

 

“Well, actually, those people of different color that have come to this nation have come this nation expressly to live by what was bequeathed to them by that settler culture, not to come and live as hunters and gatherers might have lived in this idealized picture of Indigenous Australia!”

 

Frank Salter: Yeah

 

Damien Richardson: I think Noel himself seems very comfortable living like a settler, too, I might add!

 

Frank Salter: And receiving $500 million investment over the last 15 years.

 

Damien Richardson: Is he relying on the fact that he knows no one will have the gumption to make that claim? He’s relying on. We have been silenced through the multicultural instrumentalities that we’ve already talked about?

 

Frank Salter: Yeah, he’s arisen, his career, his reputation is arisen, sheltered in sort of the sheltered workshop of the multicultural system. So he’s a creature, in my view, a creature of the multicultural establishment.

 

But Warren Mundine is not. Jacinta Price are not. They’re actually free thinking. They have their, … I don’t agree with everything they say, but these are independent individuals far more able to sustain a rational conversation and so on.

 

Pearson talks ideology. And he begins preaching immediately and he can barely talk! And how did someone like that gain such a high reputation? Was because the Sydney Morning Herald, the Melbourne Age, the ABC, SBS [Special Broadcating Service] treat him as some sort of paragon. It’s absurd!

 

The man has made vulgar, racist remarks about White people, really vulgar. The man has said:

 

“I don’t think Anzac Day is appropriate because we should focus on my people’s suffering, not on the suffering of Anzacs.”

 

Damien Richardson: Well, a lot of these people would have been Anzacs too, as a matter of fact.

 

Frank Salter: Exactly, exactly! Aborigines have been participating more and more in the nation. I see them as a core group in the Australian national identity. But Pearson has been given this platform. He writes a note, he has these extraordinary media platforms to express his point of view, but he’s actually, when you listen to what he’s saying, it’s not pleasant.

 

Damien Richardson: You see now, too, that the conservative Right salivating over the idea of Jacinta Price someday being the first indigenous female prime minister. Janet Olbrixen wrote an opinion piece in the Australian recently saying such.

 

Frank Salter: Well, after watching her perform over the last month or two, I tend to agree. I think she’s actually prime minister material. There’s not all that much talent on the coalition side. And she just comes across as authentic, as able to think on her feet.

 

For example, her speech, become famous speech now to the Canberra Press Gallery about a week or two ago. And she said, her opening remarks she said:

 

“My husband’s sitting over there. And I do mean husband, not partner!”

 

Damien Richardson: Yes, yes.

 

Frank Salter: Immediately there was a cheer went up across Australia. We’re sick of this ideological language that’s being forced on you! She meant her husband, not her partner!

 

Damien Richardson: She went further too, and she talked about the oppression. She said:

 

“I’ve got it really badly if you’re saying I’m oppressed because I’m indigenous.”

 

And she said:

 

“Well, at least I wasn’t bequeathed to a man much older than me that I might have been under tribal law at the age of 14 or something.”

 

And she went on to say, too:

 

“And I’ve been doubly oppressed because my convict ancestors were also oppressed to come here in the first place!”

 

You could hear crickets in the media establishment.

 

Frank Salter: So funny. They’re just, … Like the ABC has become., … It’s so appalling! The main change with them is not ideological, because the news and current affairs was captured by the Marxist left in the late sixties, and the Science Show was captured by the Marxist left around the same time. What has changed is their subtlety. They used to sort of cover it a bit and make gestures to being balanced. That’s all gone. It’s amazing! It’s blatant. It’s blatant now.

 

And the same with our education system, with the curriculum. The national curriculum was captured by the neo-Marxist Left decades ago and that’s trickled down to the state curricula now. So it’s really, really poor.

 

Damien Richardson: And there’s been no defence against it from neo-liberalism on the other side, has there been? Because that’s just been about the bottom line, the bottom dollar, sell as much as you can. We’ve sold our soul to material wealth in many respects.

 

Frank Salter: Yeah. And they’re friendlier towards Right-wing globalism, which is corporate based.

 

So that’s their weakness.

 

Also, they receive all their funding from these people, so they’re not going to criticize them very much.

 

So again, on the Right you have Right globalism, on the left you have Left globalism. And the two sort of nudge, nudge, wink, wink, sort of they get along, they sort of get along.

 

But I urge Australians to look at the whole indigenous issue, including The Voice referendum, which comes up in nine days or something, and look at it from different perspectives. But look at it also from an Anglo perspective, from the perspective of mainstream Australia. And what we don’t want, for example, is to destroy and complicate our system of government, which is magnificent. It’s one of the things that sets Australia apart. We have the rule of law, we have representative democracy, we have division of powers and so on. And this would be compromised.

 

[1:14:42]

 

Damien Richardson: That’s just another irony of Pearson’s speech, isn’t it, that:

 

“Well, I want an indigenous voice to Parliament, but I don’t want anything that the settlers, ..!”

 

What? The incongruity is just extraordinary!

 

Frank Salter: I don’t look on myself as a settler. You know, I had a convict ancestor in Van Diemen’s Land. So for many generations, my family’s been here, I don’t think of myself, …

 

Damien Richardson: But even if we take his language on face value, what he means is “what came here?” Well, that was the Parliament. The Parliament that now “I want a specific voice to” is not of indigenous origin, although you would say it is because we’re indigenous!

 

Oh, this argument could go on and on and on! We’ve had such a good chat, too, Frank. I’m just aware of time, and I want people to stay to the end of this podcast.

 

So I think, do you want to just tell us where people can find you so they can find out more of this detail? We may well have you back to continue this conversation, perhaps post the referendum.

 

Frank Salter: That’d be fun. People can just Google, just a general search for British-Australian Community. And we have a website, which is the BritishAustralianCommunity.com dot au.

 

And then they can search for, … You go to Quadrant online. Go to Quadrant Online. There’s a Quadrant website and just do a search for “Salter”, and up will come all my articles, because I have a series of articles on the original, ten years ago, on the original attempt by Pearson to have a constitutional recognition. That was his big thing back then. So there’s critique of that.

 

So you’ll find resources.

 

One thing you’ll find is that this book as a PDF. It’s a free download so you can get access to the book.

 

I’d also go to YouTube. We have three videos out on YouTube. Search for British-Australian Community and it will come up. We have two on Anglophobia and we have one on The Voice. And there’ll be many more coming up, by the way, many more in the next months.

 

Damien Richardson: It’s good that you’re getting culture out there because I think this process was so far behind the eight ball as in understanding what’s happening to the culture, the attack that’s on it, the manifold attacks that are on it, that you almost need to reinvigorate what the understanding of the culture was in the first place.

 

So Frank Salter, co-author of Anglophobia: The Unrecognized Hatred, thanks so much for joining me at Damienrichardson dot online.

 

Frank Salter: It’s been a pleasure, Damien.

 

Damien Richardson: You can listen to more great podcasts on my website, damianrichardson dot online. Also follow me on Facebook and I’d love to hear your thoughts@facebook.com. Damienrichardson28 don’t forget to give this video a like. Remember to share and comment, to join the conversation and have your say.

 

[1:17:50]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

YouTube Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/22/2024 = 0)

 

==========================

See Also

top

White Australia Special

Understanding Australia’s White Australia Policy

Racial Conflict in Australia with Chinese and Others

The Fight for a White Australia – the Shearers Strike

The Case for a Single, Unified Border and Federation

Should Australians Fight in the Second World War?

The Jewish Invasion in Australia Post WWII

White Australia and the Jews

The Origins of Australian Multiculturalism

Returning to White Australia – Multiculturalism is Rejection of National Identity

White Australia in 2023 – Bringing Back White Identity Politics to Australia

The Issue of Racial and Cultural Difference

What’s the Essential Inheritance of the Australian Policy?

Joel and Blair Show

Joel Davis: Welcome to a special. I am joined by Matthew Grant of the Australian Natives Association once again.

 

And today we are going to do a deep dive into the White Australia Policy, the history, the context, the ideological and political aspects of it and do a broad overview of its history, why it came into being, what its precursors were, what were the forces that ripped it apart? What were the forces that opposed it all along? And reflect upon it from the position of contemporary Australian politics and the current national situation.

 

Welcome Matthew to the channel. It’s a pleasure to have you.

 

Mathew Grant: Yeah, thanks, Joel. Thanks for having me on again. It’s good to be back and honestly, it’s been a bit long since we last had a bit of a catch up, which is a bit of a shame. But, yeah, I suffer from the same disease as many other men in the ANA. We’re all very busy men, we all have careers and families and study commitments and all the rest of it, so time is a bit of a challenge.

 

Before we get into it, I’m obliged to give a couple of disclaimers to align with our media policy in the ANA. So, firstly, the views expressed here are my own and not necessarily those of the ANA.

 

And secondly, I do not exercise any control over the channel and that my appearance as a guest shouldn’t be taken as an endorsement, necessarily of any published material on the channel.

 

But, yeah, you’ve opened up, right.

 

I mean, the question of the White Australia Policy, which rotates around the Immigration Restriction Act is a huge subject. We couldn’t even do justice to it in this single podcast. There’s a litany of literature and even oral history which builds on this subject which is so crucial and so fundamental to our country.

 

One famous Australian Parliamentarian said:

 

“That in Australia, White Australia is not a mere policy, it is a religion.”

 

This concept of a White nation, a beacon of civilisation in the southern hemisphere, in the Pacific, really does go down to the heart of what Australia is, what Australia’s political and cultural destiny and ambition and idealism really was. So a noble subject to explore.

 

Joel Davis: It’s so important if you are a nationalist or if you are an identitarian, someone who listens to this channel. If you’re an Australian, you need to know your history of your own country, obviously. And a lot of these facts and elements in Australian history, there’s unfortunately a lack of knowledge. People have a very contemporary outlook on politics. They’re broadly aware of current events and global events, but the historical knowledge is lacking because this isn’t something that they teach you in school, for obvious reasons. They don’t want you to have a national historical consciousness, they don’t want you to be proud of your ancestors and of your history and understand who you are. Because if you did, then you’d probably want the White Australia Policy back and you’d probably become a White nationalist of some description.

 

We now live under a society in which that makes you persona non-grata, where the state declares this to be an extremist ideology, even though we’ve only had 31 prime ministers in Australia’s history. And I think it would be fair to say the first 16 up to Robert Menzies could be described as White nationalists.

 

[03:32]

 

So if you are a White nationalist, you have the majority view. If we went to heaven and we got together all the previous Australian prime ministers and all the current living ones and we sat them in a room, we would be, in the majority opinion, alongside all of our nation’s founders, all of the great men of the first half of our nation’s history.

 

Yet somehow this is now totally marginalised as an extreme fringe radical ideology, which is only possible due to the lack of historical consciousness in our nation.

 

Also, for foreign viewers, I think it’s a really instructive tale because obviously the White race is under attack globally and there are a lot of lessons in Australia’s history that you can take on for your respective national histories. Australia is perhaps the most explicit White nationalist project of any country in the world.

 

So I think for the future, for our people and for this idea of a global racial consciousness and so on, Australia really is a potent example of racial identitarianism.

 

So with that, let’s get into some of the history. And I think the logical place for us to start here is the Gold Rush of the mid 19th century. Because the Gold Rush, from the beginning to the end of the Gold Rush, our national population more than tripled. People were pouring in from all over the world to try and get a run at some of that gold, obviously, because if you strike gold, that’s your ticket out of an impoverished lifestyle, particularly at that time in history when people weren’t as well off as they are today.

 

And obviously the majority of the people who came to Australia, to try and take advantage of the Gold Rush were Europeans. But you also had Chinese pouring in and people of other races pouring in this was really the foundation of the racial clash.

 

Obviously, we had the experience of the Aboriginals and so on, but this was really the origin of dealing with non-White immigration in Australia and the formation of a racial politics in the country.

 

So maybe I’ll throw it to you Grant.

 

Mathew Grant: Yeah, well, no worries. Well, one little contrarian thing for you is I actually did learn this in school, all the way through primary school and high school, which wasn’t too long ago. This was actually a not unreasonable size of our curriculum. The question of the Gold Rush. The question of White Australia.

 

[05:55]

 

So I guess I’ve been disproportionately blessed when compared to a lot of other people I’ve met around Australia who never really touched on much of this history. I was very fortunate to get a first bite of it in my schooling. Obviously, it was all tinged with this kind of negative accusations that the White Australia Policy was kind of premised on bigotry and an unreasonable hatred of foreigners.

 

But just to address that really quickly before I touch on the Gold Rush. Even at the time of the Gold Rush, this was a very simple question that White European descent miners in the country of New South Wales and Victoria were being quite literally overrun and outnumbered, displaced by Chinese migrants. You can’t blame the Chinese migrants escaping from the poverty of their own home country to come and try find their fortunes here.

 

[Miners at Miners at Fairleys Creek, Buckland Valley gold mines]

 

But one particular area called Buckland River*, there was a gold mining settlement there which was quite large, and it homed around, 2,000 Chinese settlers and 500 European descent settlers. Buckland River actually descended into a violent riot on the 4th of July where the local miners had thrown all the Chinese out of the town.

 

[* During the Victorian gold rush of the 1850s the Buckland Valley was home to several thousand Chinese miners. On 4 July 1857, following a meeting at a Buckland Valley public house, approximately 100 European miners violently expelled most Chinese miners from the area in an event referred to as the Buckland Riot. The Buckland River was rich in alluvial gold and was dredged extensively in the 19th century. Source: Wikipedia]

 

According to history, the Chinese had started building their own temple to their own pagan foreign gods. And this very deeply begrieved the Europeans there because they hadn’t even managed to build themselves a church yet.

 

So when news of this new temple got around, the people were absolutely outraged and began an act of overwhelming kind of coercion. There was some violence, there was some injuries, but principally, they just told all these Chinese people to pack their bags, and they all left. They were force marched out of the town and then they burnt down all the Chinese buildings and occupations, so it was deserted after that.

 

But the Gold Rush was a tremendous period in history.

 

So this was before Federation, this is before Australia had a single united federal border. You had the colonies of Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland and South Australia. Queensland and South Australia had wide open borders. They had no racial policies, no interest in having a strongly enforceable border. And that as well, they actually really struggled to have an enforceable border just due to the sheer scale of the borders. A lot of boats could land in those colonies without much impedance and people could travel overland.

 

In New South Wales and in Victoria in 1861 is really when the racial struggle began kicking off. And that was in Young in New South Wales, which formerly then was known as Lambing Flat.

 

In that time, you had all these Chinese migrants, principally coming into the gold fields. They were making all the best findings. They were washing their dirty clothes and sluicing and dirtying the rivers so Europeans couldn’t drink the clean water. There was a lot of cultural, I suppose, anxiety of the scale of the Chinese migration.

 

[09:39]

 

And then there was, in fact, just the basic incompatibility of the two cultures. And in Young, it was in February, 1861, that they basically had another kind of like the Buckland River event, they had another violent episode. This one was particularly more violent.

 

[Image: The Roll Up Banner with which a mob of 2,000–3,000 men rallied and attacked Chinese miners at Lambing Flat in June 1861. The banner is displayed in Lambing Flat, now known as Young.]

 

However, I think the Chinese put up a bit more of a fight, which resulted in some deaths and some injuries. The founder of the Labour Party and the Australian Workers Union, William Spence, wrote in his book Australia’s Awakening that:

 

“They drove the Chinese off the field, some of the pig tailed heathens losing their lives!”

 

It was quite a violent episode, which resulted in the police trying to arrest a great number of the European rioters or instigators of this kind of rebellion. In response to that, the rioters burnt down the police station and the police narrowly escaped with their lives and had to charge to the nearest station at the barracks in Goulburn, which was quite a distance away from Young.

 

So it was a very heated, a very spectacular event in Young which really demonstrated the anger, but also the willpower and the will of these miners to maintain these kind of higher standards on the gold fields which had been subverted by these cheap Chinese migrants.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think many commentators view this as the origin point, essentially, of White nationalism in Australia, or nationalism, I mean, calling it “White nationalism” is somewhat reductive in the sense that the term nationalism doesn’t really make any sense without reference to a people of shared ancestry.

 

So obviously, that has racial connotations. And in English, back at that time, the term “nation” and the term “race” would have been used interchangeably by most people, unlike conventions in the contemporary era. So they would not have really been able to understand nationalism as anything but, quote, unquote, “White nationalism”. They would not be able to conceive of a different kind of nationalism in those days, and we really shouldn’t be able to today either, except for the abuse that has been done to our language.

 

So you have these acts passed in the mid 1850s, I think 1855, in Victoria 1861, in New South Wales to restrict the influx of Chinese immigration, obviously in response to this general unrest.

 

And at that time, obviously, these are all colonies of the British Empire, and the British government and its representatives weren’t exactly enthused. Britain’s then colonial secretary in 1861, when the New South Wales Parliament did pass these laws, Lord Carnarvon, he was not pleased. He stated that, quote:

 

“That exceptional legislation intended to exclude from any part of Her Majesty’s dominions the subjects of the state at peace with Her Majesty is highly objectionable in principle.”

 

And the pressure was put on after the Chinese stopped flowing in to rescind the laws, and they were, they were actually repealed.

 

So from this very early origin, there was, from the British imperial influence, resistance to this organic movement of Australian nationalism in the general population. They were willing to make concessions to it, obviously, to maintain order and political stability, but they weren’t exactly supportive.

 

[13:26]

 

And that was a trend that you see continually from then onwards. Because from the British perspective, Australia wasn’t genuinely a nation. There was the British race, many of whom just happened to be in colonial Australia. And Australia was an economic zone as far as they were concerned. And they were more interested in protecting the interest of wealthy industrialists and other capitalist interests who benefited from importing cheap non-White labour into the country.

 

In 1876, the Queensland Parliament passed a Bill to amend the Goldfields Act, which would basically put a higher licensing fee upon Asians in order to discourage them from coming into Australia as well and encourage them to go home. The ones that were already there. And the British appointed governor of Queensland reserved the bill, prevented it from being passed and sent it to the British government. They didn’t approve it and the Bill didn’t become law.

 

So they’re already intervening here.

 

And this is important in understanding the context leading up to Federation and so on and the emergence of the Australian labour movement and this perception that capitalist interests and British imperial interests were the main enemies basically of Australian nationalism.

 

Mathew Grant: Yeah, it’s exactly right! I guess, Australia was to them just an economic zone. It was a place where you could raise sheep, wheat and sugar cane, make good money and go take your money back home to England and have a good time. Charles Pearson writes in National Life and Character in 1893:

 

“The fear of Chinese immigration, which the Australian democracy cherishes and which the Englishmen at home find hard to understand, is in fact the instinct of self preservation. Quickened by experience, we know that coloured and White labour cannot exist side by side. We are well aware that China can swamp us with a single year’s surplus of population. And we know that if national existence is sacrificed to the working of a few mines and sugar plantations, it’s not the Englishmen in Australia alone, but the whole civilised world that will be the losers.”

 

In a similar stead Teddy Roosevelt, the American President did a review of Pearson’s work and he also formed the view that not only the United States, but Australia were both subject to international finance oligarchs that these English, usually residing in England, persons of financial means, were using our countries to make money. And slavery in the south of the United States was a product of that process.

 

[Image: The Port Phillip Gold Mining Company’s claim and  the township of Clunes]

 

In the same way, in Australia, the importation of Chinese was used heavily. So back in the 19th century there was a lot of cases like that. So one instance in the town of Clunes in Victoria, there was a gold mine there that was making money. There was no issues. It was a commercially viable operation.

 

[16:36]

 

However, the shareholders decided that they wanted to pay less for labour and so they actually brought in three or four horse carriages full of Chinese labourers and intended to sack all of the Australian and European descent miners from the gold mine. And this town of Clunes the entire town, men, women and children physically mobilised themselves with weapons and blockaded the roads coming into the town.

 

So the horses that were drawing these Chinese scabs, as we would call them, non-unionised labourers, these Chinese scabs were stopped on the road, and they had actually police escort as well. It’s a famous story I always make reference to because the policeman bore his rifle and pointed it at a woman, and the woman picked up a rock and was about to throw it at the policeman and said:

 

“I’d rather be shot than starved!”

 

And this was the dire situation that these people in Victoria and people in towns and regions all around Australia faced, that they were looking down the barrel of being completely replaced by Chinese scab labourers who would work for a bowl of rice a day. And would not work at European standards of work. They wouldn’t work for a fair rate.

 

And this actually manifested in a whole bunch of events. I won’t get into the full detail of all of them. But similar situation in 1878, you had the maritime strike, where basically a large Australasian steam navigation company sacked all of their White sailors and replaced them with Chinese sailors, which resulted in other riots and a strike which were successful. Thank heavens.

 

There was also the black legging for Polynesian labourers in Queensland for sugarcane.

 

A lot of people in that time were convinced that White men of European stock could not settle the tropics. I mean, Marcus Clark, Charles Pearson, Teddy Roosevelt, they all kind of subscribe to this concept that warm climates are unsuitable for people of northern European stock.

 

[Image: The Australasian, 13 March, 1897, p. 4, advertisement indicating ‘European Labour’ made furniture.]

 

So they were bringing in Polynesian labourers to Queensland. During the same time as the gold rush, unsuccessful Chinese miners who didn’t find any goods on the gold fields ended up taking over the Victorian manufacturing industries, primarily in furniture. So you had lots of backyard furniture factories that were sweating 70 hours week, undercutting the wages and conditions of Australian labourers in factories in Victoria. Which actually resulted in a few riots and some legislation which required all furniture be stamped if it was made by European or Chinese labourers.

 

And all of this kicking off around the 1860s, 1870s, finally culminated in the Great Shearers Strike in 1891. So William Spence, the founder of the Labour Party, says in his book Australia’s Awakening:

 

“When they were going to fill White men’s places with Chinese and further insisted on freedom of contract, which means non-unionised agreements, shearers and shed hands had no alternative but to go on strike.”

 

So 1891 saw probably the largest industrial action in Australian history, resulting in the army having to be mobilised because there was actual fears of a genuine civil war and a revolutionary army of thousands of shearers armed with rifles taking over the colony of Queensland.

 

[20:38]

 

So there was a lot of stuff going on, just after the gold rush and during the gold rush, which was really testing multiculturalism, the earliest form of it. I mean, principally dealing with Chinese migrants. But it was very clear across the board that this was detrimental to the national health. There was a lot of labour struggle against it. But there was also liberal thinkers who were uninvolved with the Labour movement that were staunchly in favour of this principle of a White Australia. Henry Parks was probably one of the first of those leading men.

 

But in the Inter-Colonial Conference of 1888, a lot of colonial Parliamentarians had come together to meet and they all agreed that the further introduction of Chinese to Australia was going to be detrimental to the country.

 

And as you rightfully said, they all tried to legislate to this end and the Crown refused to give royal assent to them because they, at the time, had colonised India. They had millions and millions and millions of Indians that were technically British subjects. The Englishmen at home didn’t understand the importance of these racial issues because they’d never experienced it.

 

And so they, withheld this legislation, …

 

Joel Davis: The original NIMBY* shit-libs!

 

[* The phrase “not in my backyard,” shortened to “NIMBY,” seems to have appeared first in the mid-1970s. It was used in the context of the last major effort by electric utilities to construct nuclear-powered generating stations, especially those located in Seabrook, New Hampshire, and Midland, Michigan. Source: Britannica]

 

Mathew Grant: Yeah, exactly! Just had no idea. Yeah. I mean, Henry Higgins, the High Court Justice and Parliamentarian, said that:

 

“The principle of a White Australia really came about when people had to rub shoulders with foreign labour and compete with them.”

 

But the rich people, the people in the agricultural societies and chambers of commerce, they don’t understand because they’ve never had to compete with them. And even better, they profiteer off scab cheap labour from overseas.

 

So it’s a fascinating bit of history. I mean, it caused a lot of violence, a lot of grief, a lot of people were displaced, a lot of people lost their work and employment. But it also created this national psyche. It forced these people of different European descent and even inter-British cultures, Irish and Welsh and English and Scots. All these people had to unify under a single concept of a White Australia that’s a European descent, Australian ethnic identity, which would repel these cheap foreign invaders.

 

JF Archibald, the publisher of The Bulletin, the old newspaper, he’s attributed to saying:

 

“By the term ‘Australian’, we mean not just those who are merely born in Australia, but all White men who come to these shores with a clean record and who leave behind them the memory of class distinction and religious difference in the Old World, all men who place the happiness of their adopted lands before imperialism are Australian.”

 

So you saw this ethno-genesis kicking off around the same time of all these struggles against Chinese labour.

 

[24:07]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, and obviously that is so relevant I think in our time, it’s only become more relevant, that concept. I mean, it wasn’t just the economic struggles, although we have to remember that it’s not like today where the idea of having to compete with foreign labour is annoying, but there’s so many safety nets and comforts in modern society. I mean, it was a life or death matter in those days to find gainful employment.

 

There was no Social Security systems established. You really were on your own either as an individual, as part of a community. But there wasn’t this big state bureaucracy, there wasn’t all of this modern social architecture,

 

Mathew Grant: No Fair Work Commission.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, there are two components. You got the more kind of trade Unionist types who you mentioned William Spence, who is one of the major trade Unionist figures in this late 19th century Australian nationalism and went on to be influential after federation as well. And quote from him to get a feel for their politics. He’s saying this, by the way, while conceding that, yeah, there are some liberal conservative elements in Australian politics that also did politically support the White Australia Policy. But his stance is:

 

“That the anti-socialist is invariably (as I quote) the most unpatriotic person to be found. He belongs to the Stinking Fish Party. If he cannot get his own stupid way, he denounces the country in which he has done so well. The bedrock of the cry for a colour line across the continent so that anti-socialists could boss N-words and yellow men is found in the anti-socialist nature. He is a born tyrant and as the White Australian will not stand his tyranny, he must have a N-word to order about. There is no patriotism in the anti-socialist press, hence it barracks for anything the capitalist crowd asked for.”

 

So there was this, obviously from the Labourerists, this keen sense of class warfare and a very racial concept of trade unionism, as you mentioned.

 

This idea that there’s something about being a Whiteman was having this collective mentality. And people often flip that these days and talk about how to be a Whiteman is to be individualistic and that all the other races are more collectivist than us. But they had this inverse perception that it was actually the Whiteman who had this inherent virtue that “all for one and one for all” was their kind of principle and as opposed to the pursuit of individual advantage, this kind of rejection of bourgeois morality.

 

So that was a strong component. Obviously, the Australian Labour Party was formed out of that worldview and that tendency.

 

[26:36]

 

But at the same time you also had more liberal nationalist elements like HP Higgins, who went on to become Attorney General and was massively influential in the early politics of Federal Australia and the formation of the White Australia Policy. A staunch advocate.

 

You have Alfred Deacon, Australia’s second Prime Minister, one of the most influential prime ministers in Australian history. Really set the tone for the early phase of Australian politics, the so-called Australian Settlement. Alfred Deacon, in his maiden speech to Parliament, declared:

 

“Australia to be an Aryan Christian nation.”

 

His racial Unitarianism and his religious faith were really front and centre of his political project. They were the Protectionist Party. So they opposed themselves to the pro-British Empire free traders. They aligned themselves with colonial White Australians and their interests, but they weren’t so much trade Unionists. Instead they had this liberal, democratic conception of nationalism. But nevertheless they were also integral in the formation of White Australia. But we’re going to get into the story of Federation now. I’ll turn it back to you.

 

But once Federation forms, the Labour Party comes to be really the front and centre advocates of the White Australia Policy. But you do have a lot of these other more centrist national elements that are also supportive. But maybe to turn it back to you on the logic in Federation and the forces that pushed for it. Because Australia didn’t have what the Americans had, a revolution and Republicanism. Maybe in retrospect, maybe we should have, considering we ultimately haven’t protected White Australia and White Australia was being ripped away from us. But at the time, what were the kind of practical considerations?

 

Obviously there was a logic of entering into an agreement with the Empire where the Empire would make concessions and allow us essentially to have our White nationalist thing, but still conciliatory in many respects to British business interests and imperial interests, foreign policy interests and so on.

 

And there was a tension there. Was that because we felt we didn’t have the capacity to stage a revolution? Or was there a sense of:

 

“Well, there’s benevolence and that we can do this in a clean political way?”

 

Also at the time, you have the context of Charles Henry Pearson, his conception, which you alluded to before, of the Whiteman under siege:

 

“That the world wasn’t destined to be ruled by these White, globe spanning empires forever. But that this was an aberration in history and that the vitality of the Anglo Saxon race and some of the other European races was limited and would burn itself out in cosmopolitanism and so on and declining birth rates. And the yellow races and other races would rise and they would become peers on the international stage and take their countries back from colonial domination.”

 

[29:17]

 

He was obviously quite prescient with that because that’s literally how the 20th century played out. And he feared forces of misgegenation would be existential for the White race, and that therefore an explicit politics of racial preservation and explicit White nationalism was necessary because he had that, as you mentioned, this view that the Whiteman really only belonged in the temperate zones and that living in northern Queensland would be a problem. He didn’t predict that we could adapt to those environments, which obviously kind of seems silly now to a certain extent. But nevertheless, the view was well, in Australia and in North America, we have these temperate zones where the Whiteman can set up states that have the explicit goal of racial self preservation to secure a future for our people and way of life despite changing global conditions.

 

That’s important to recognise as well that the White Australia Policy wasn’t just based in some kind of contemptuous hatred for other races, but was based in an existential requirement, a struggle from the very beginning. Whether you’re talking about the early Australian labour movement or talking about nationalist intellectuals and political figures and so on.

 

They were big picture people and they obviously were very happy with White culture and the White way of life and wanted to preserve it. But they didn’t necessarily have this seething hatred or even this will to dominate other races, but actually they wanted separation for the preservation of our way of life down the generations.

 

And so this is actually the opposite of a supremacist worldview, it’s a separatist worldview and it’s a worldview that actually gave respect to these foreign races by saying:

 

“Well, we don’t actually anticipate our capacity to dominate you is going to be successful or even desirable. Instead, we recognise that we can’t dominate the world entirely and that we need ethno-states or racial states in certain pockets of the world.”

 

With all of that context, what’s your impression of the key forces leading up to Federation? Why we went for a conciliatory approach to the British Empire? Was it just through sentimental attachment to the mother country and the fact that we were ultimately sons of the British Isles, or was there more to the story than that?

 

[31:16]

 

Mathew Grant: Yep, I guess starting off moving towards Federation. So you had Henry Parks. He was our main man in New South Wales, a Parliamentarian. And to touch on that subject of racial bigotry, I agree, the White Australia Policy was absolutely never premised on this concept that we just hate everyone else and therefore we don’t want to let them in. There was serious qualities to the idea of the policy.

 

Henry Parks, in his second reading of the Chinese Restriction Bill in the New South Wales Colonial Parliament, said:

 

“They are not an inferior race, they are a superior set of people, a nation of old and deep rooted civilisation. It is because I believe the Chinese to be a powerful race, capable of taking a great hold upon this country, and because I want to preserve the type of my own nation, I am and always have been opposed to the influx of Chinese. I contend that if this young nation is to maintain the fabric of its liberties unassailed and unimpaired, it cannot admit into its population any element that of necessity must be of an inferior nature and character. In other words, I’ve maintained at all times that we should not encounter or admit amongst us any class of persons whatever, whom we are not prepared to advance to all our franchises.”

 

So basically, Henry Parks, he was a great thinker of his time. He was known as the “Father of Federation”. He was the one who made Federation very politically popular. He campaigned on the issue.

 

So New South Wales had at this time managed to introduce a poll tax. So if you were Chinese and you were getting off a ship in Sydney Harbour, there’d be a quite heavy financial cost to you getting off the boat. You were allowed in, but it would come at a cost. Queensland and South Australia did not have this. And at the time they were basically skipping the poll tax by landing in Queensland and South Australia and walking across the border.

 

So we had this issue where Victoria and New South Wales, who were trying to protect their ethnic homogeneity, were being swamped by Chinese migrants through Queensland and South Australia. So it became increasingly evident that there needed to be a single, unified national border Australia and the Pacific Ocean, and that every colony in the continent should be part of this one single nation which has a single immigration policy and a single controllable border. This was a big area of the Australian Natives Association platform as well.

 

So the ANA was started in 1871 and it was in favour of the native born European descent people of Australia.

 

And as part of that, it was a staunch advocate of a White Australia and of Federation. Because they saw that getting that single, unified border is going to be the thing that prevents us from becoming another melting pot like had been seen in the United States.

 

The honourable King O’Malley, who became the minister for home affairs in one of the early Australian Parliaments, said:

 

“If the Australian people had only lived in the southern states of America, as I have, and had seen the dire results of the present mingling of the Africans with the Whites, they would put their feet down and say, ‘We are not going to leave such an unholy problem behind for future generations to solve’.”

 

And in the same vein, Jack Beasley, who was a New South Wales Parliamentarian in the 1920s, said:

 

“It’s possible to live on the highest terms of mutual respect with one’s neighbour, whilst recognizing that it would be destructive of all harmony to invite him to become a permanent resident in one’s household.”

 

So you had these ideas. We Australians of European stock, we are in the Pacific, we have Asian neighbours, we should be friends with them, but at the same time we should recognise it would be destructive of all harmony. These people don’t share the same heritage as us. They did not adopt Magna Carta, they did not adopt the Act of Settlement, they did not adopt Roman law, Roman principles of equity and justice. They are completely alien to us.

 

And we talk about White nationalism and why it’s important to be White. And I think one of the great reasons for that is because we are actually related by blood to the people who died for these high principles of civilisation, which we hold very dear.

 

So these Asian migrants, as Henry Parks was saying, they have alien concepts to us. They are not going to develop the same brand of civilisation which we hold so dear. They have their own ways, and their own ways are definitely noble to them and something that they would venerate. But to us, we have a higher calling based on our own heritage and based on our own concepts of civilisation and justice and equity and all the rest of it.

 

So the march towards Federation was really for that single, unified border. James Stewart said in 1901, and this is during the debates on the Immigration Restriction Act:

 

“We do not desire to keep out those coloured people simply because they’re inferior to us, but because for racial, social, and economic reasons, we cannot permit them safely to enter. With regards to race, we cannot mix with them. There is no natural affinity between them and us. And if an attempt were made to confide them and us in one bottle, so to speak, one or the other must be precipitated to the bottom. A compacted, homogeneous community cannot be formed out of such heterogeneous compounds. The thing ought not to be attempted because it is absolutely impossible!”

 

“With regards to the social aspect of the question, these people are brought up under institutions entirely different from ours. Their religion, position and customs are different. I should be a traitor to my country, to my race, and to those of our ancestors who have conferred benefits upon us. If I were a party to anything which would allow these Asiatics to come here and destroy in one fell swoop all the efforts of centuries. For these reasons, I think we are all agreed that the coloured man must be kept out, whether he is a Japanese, a Chinaman, or an African.”

 

So I think in general, ideological terms, aside from the Labour issues of wages and unionism, the intellectual concept was that White people of European descent, are in fact inheritors of political and social and cultural institutions, dating all the way back through from Rome up to now, that were noble, that needed to be defended, and would be absolutely destroyed by an influx of foreigners.

 

As it said, that Chinese could take this country with a single year’s surplus population. I think all of the founders understood and realised that a non-European descent majority in Australia would mean a death of all the legal and political institutions which we hold so dear and we think are crucial to our civilisation.

 

[38:53]

 

Now, how this relates to the British Empire? As I said previously, the British Empire at the time had millions of people in India. Before Federation Natal had attempted to – this is in South Africa – the Natal colony attempted to have an explicit racial immigration policy. They wanted to preserve Natal for people of European stock, and the British refused to give them royal assent in similar ways that they refused us.

 

But at the same time, Australia was very low in population. It didn’t have great industries and military resources at its disposal. A lot of the early Parliamentarians and people pushing for Federation understood that the protection of the British fleet, the British Navy, was what’s going to allow us to have a White Australia, that the millions of desperate Asians to our north would not be able to be repelled by an Australian independent army.

 

So even those with Republican sympathies in the Labour Party all acknowledged that the defense of Australia really relied on the British Navy.

 

And so we had to keep our ties to Britain quite neat and tidy.

 

So that was that.

 

I mean, there’s definitely the ethnic solidarity thing as well, I mean, we were being constantly populated by first generation British migrants who did feel an affinity with the United Kingdom and felt that that was home. I mean, it is also our heritage. I mean we are predominantly of British extraction in Australia, and I think people feel, the practical side of it. We needed the British Navy, but also the cultural side of it that we felt ourselves of European British extraction particularly.

 

I think a lot of people hadn’t come to grips with how badly the British Parliament and the Crown had really betrayed our interests in terms of an immigration platform.

 

But as Dr. William Maloney said in 1912, this is before World War I kicks off:

 

“If England were to go down, the result would be disastrous to Anglo-Celtic Saxon race the whole world over. We should be rendered helpless against one of the greatest fighting nations the world has ever known. I shall never utter a word derogatory of the Japanese as a nation, but what could we do unaided against such a nation?”

 

So at Federation time, there was the acknowledgment. We finally had the ability to make our own laws. The Crown could withdraw Royal Assent and that was a real threat. So even at the time of the Immigration Restriction Act, even though a lot of Parliamentarians wanted an explicit racial law, and that’s constitutional under Section 51 of the Constitution, there was still a great fear that the Crown wouldn’t give it royal assent and therefore it wouldn’t become law for fear of offending all of the Indians in the Empire.

 

So, yeah, there was a very kind of vexed issue, but it’s multi pronged, definitely, the practical consideration. We need the British Navy to defend a White Australia and we also feel a cultural and heritage affinity with it.

 

And a lot of people were genuinely loyal to the Crown. So those are, I suppose, the main considerations.

 

[42:19]

 

Joel Davis: It is, I think, important, though, to recognise that pretty much all factions at the time bar, very few, were committed to White Australia. And that was really the guiding principle, this principle that we need to preserve our people and our race on this continent and make this the Whiteman’s continent, was a prevailing bipartisan stance. And the debate was how do we go about that best.

 

The defense of Australia, the geopolitical angle obviously is vital and that obviously plays a massive role in first half of the 20th century as we go to two wars for the British Empire.

 

Yeah, I think people don’t really realise now that at the time of Federation we didn’t truly become an independent nation state and not just in the basic sense that it is now where obviously we still share a head of state with the United Kingdom. But Australia was originally still defined as a colony, it was defined as a “self governing colony” according to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, which was an act in British Parliament.

 

From the British standpoint, they were happy to go along with it because it improved the ease of administration that they just had this one central Australian government to deal with, rather than all of these separate colonies to liaise with. But ultimately the British government still had oversight over the Australian Constitution, which they did interfere with after it was approved by an Australian referendum. And most of their interventions were either to serve their foreign policy interests.

 

So you have the alliance with Japan that was brokered in 1904, which really perturbed us because the Japanese were seen as our main national security threat in our region, yet the British were getting in bed with them because they feared the rise of the Germans. The unified Germany became their obviously direct rival in Europe and so they didn’t want to commit as many forces to maintaining their position in the Asia Pacific region.

 

And so the solution to that was to make an alliance with the most powerful rising power in the region, which at the time was the Japanese, fresh off defeating the Russians in a war, and defeating the Chinese and they had all these expansionist aims and so on.

 

Obviously we saw how that ended up playing out in the Second World War where we ultimately had to confront them.

 

[44:25]

 

But not only was the foreign policy of the United Kingdom and this Britain centric foreign policy that they had where Australia wasn’t seen as a partner so much as a colony for the first few decades of our existence, but know you had all these wealthy British capitalists, many of them of jewish extraction, who were based out of the City of London, who had extensive investments in Australia. And those investments often also provided them with an interest in coloured immigration. So that produced also a tension. But primarily it was the foreign policy of the British. They didn’t want to anger the Japanese. The Japanese were not fans of Australia having explicit racialist laws on the books preventing the immigration of all non-White races.

 

And so the advisement that was given by the British government was that we do a dictation test. So instead of having an explicit law there were many elements in the Labour Party, I think the entire Labour Party actually at the time and many other elements in the Australian government or the Australian political establishment, who wanted an explicit racial law about who can come to Australia, who can become a citizen, who can enter the country. They even wanted to put it into the Constitution, many of them, but that was declined.

 

And instead they were advised to have a dictation test where basically, if someone tried to immigrate to Australia who was seen as undesirable, which basically meant that they weren’t White, they probably also did it to many Slavic and Mediterranean types, because at that time they had a very Anglo conception of who we were. And maybe they were more amenable to some German immigrants or some Scandinavian immigrants, but generally speaking, they weren’t huge fans of jewish immigrants, they weren’t huge fans of Italian immigrants or Polish immigrants or anything like that, even. But basically, they had a dictation test which could be given in any arbitrary language they could choose from.

 

So if they didn’t like someone, they could just give it to them in a language they knew they didn’t understand to ensure that they would fail.

 

So it was a kind of bureaucratic trickery where the White Australia Policy was enforced basically through bureaucratic processes, rather than through an explicit legal framework. And many people found that to be somewhat offensive to the Australian sensibility. We like to be direct and upfront. But the Japanese were not too happy about it. And so to maintain the alliance, that was what was necessary.

 

And then you mentioned we get to the First World War. Obviously, Australia commit incredible forces. 60,000 Australians died fighting for the British Empire in the First World War, which was more than double the Australian deaths in the Second World War, I believe, just to give an idea of the scale. And we did that because we wanted a seat at the table in the Empire. We wanted to elevate our position in the Empire, to get more influence in the Empire, and so we wanted to prove ourselves.

 

[47:16]

 

So the logic was, with the Australian political establishment, by going hard for the Empire and showing that you need us. When you actually go to war, you want the Australians there fighting on the battlefield, defending the Empire. And we wanted to earn our position through that. And it did succeed to the extent that Billy Hughes, the Nationalist Prime Minister at the time, was able to be a key figure at the Treaty of Versailles at the end of the war. And the Japanese, as an ally in the First World War, were angling for the introduction of a racial equality clause to be accepted by the League of Nations, whereby laws that were explicitly discriminatory on racial grounds be abolished. Billy Hughes fought against that tooth and nail and succeeded partially by spreading fear mongering propaganda around the legislation in the United States of America to create domestic pressure upon Woodrow Wilson, at the time the American President, to acquiesce. And so they did.

 

It was also interesting that at the time, we demanded Papua New Guinea from the Germans who had taken it.

 

And interestingly, we actually had told the British before the Germans took New Guinea, that they were about to and that we wanted their support to defend it due to fears of having hostile powers on our doorstep. And the British told us not to worry about it and ultimately that it wasn’t their problem. We were right, the Germans took it.

 

And another key factor into our participation, our extensive participation in the First World War, was the sense that if the Germans were to win, that perhaps Australia would be a bargaining chip to the British, that they would hand us over to the Germans in a wartime settlement and we would start taking German immigrants. Considering how things have played out historically, maybe that wouldn’t have been so bad! Maybe it would have been better if we had lost World War I [chuckling] and were handed over to the Germans. White Australia would probably still exist today had that happened in that alternative timeline. But from the standpoint of that time, you can understand as proud Anglos why we didn’t want that eventuality.

 

But nevertheless, due to these foreign policy concerns, which were very real, we were all the way with the Empire, obviously, up until the Second World War. Maybe the story of the Second World War would be better if I pass that one over to Grant.

 

Mathew Grant: Obviously we go hard to defend England. That way the British Navy isn’t knocked out of the universe, so we’re protected against Asia.

 

Along comes World War II and the Japanese are pouring down through Asia. They’ve taken China, they’ve used Australian steel to do it. Thank you, Bob Menzies!

 

And then they started marching towards Singapore, which is a great trading outpost of the British Empire at the time.

 

Now, the British absolutely botched the defense of Singapore! And we had thousands and thousands and thousands of Australian soldiers posted there under British commanders.

 

[50:05]

 

And basically what happened was they had all their guns pointed out to the sea, out into the harbour, expecting a Japanese naval assault. But they landed themselves over thousands of bicycles and little wagons through the land access to the back of Singapore and began a siege of the city. Some Australian divisions valiantly held them back for a couple of days, but suddenly the Japanese were knocking on the door, and the British generals actually thought that urban combat was not gentlemanly and therefore immediately surrendered.

 

And all of the British and Australian soldiers were force marched to POW camps and died in enormous numbers. I mean, just on the march alone, thousands and thousands of men were killed.

 

And then they spent the rest of the war in concentration camps, where they were starved and tortured. And I’m sure everyone knows the story, but it was at that time, I think, Australia really came to the reckoning that the British were out of the game. They’d pull the plug on Asia and we were on our own.

 

So Bob Menzies tremendously lost the election. In comes John Curtin and the Labour Party, which mobilised the entire country immediately putting everyone on food rations and portioning, nationalizing industry, bringing online an Australian war machine to produce weapons and tanks and planes to defend Australia. Massive numbers of Australians were mobilised to fight.

 

And we were already in the war with the Germans over in Europe. And Australia had a lot of soldiers, a lot of assets over in North Africa. And immediately John Curtin makes the command:

 

“We’re coming back.”

 

And the British Parliament and Winston Churchill were sulking and whinging:

 

“You have to defend us! We’re going to get crushed by the krauts in Europe!”

 

And Curtin just said:

 

“No! We have to bring the soldiers back to Australia, to defend from Japan.”

 

And this really is reflective of the psyche of the British at the time:

 

“These colonials, they belong to us, they’re our pawn on the chessboard. We need to protect the UK from the krauts! Who cares what happens to this far off backwards colony?”

 

But anyway, Curtin stood his ground. The Australians’ assets in Europe mobilised, got on a bunch of transport ships, and they were on the Pacific. And suddenly Winston Churchill gets on the foghorn to the captain and commands him to turn around and land all the troops in Ceylon to defend India from the Japanese invasion. Because Churchill and the British Parliamentarians and the other financial interests in Britain were more concerned about their financial interests in India being lost to the Japanese than actually the defense of Australia and the White European descent people in Australia.

 

[53:11]

 

Fortunately, through a couple of very powerfully worded cables from our Prime Minister, John Curtin, the commander of the ship did end up bringing Australia’s troops and assets back to Australia, to begin preparing for a defense in Papua New Guinea, which we’d freshly won from the Germans. Thanks to the great foresight of Billy Hughes, that Papua New Guinea would be the buffer zone between us and the foreseen Japanese opponent.

 

I mean, long before I read you that quote before about what would happen if England fell and know Japan is our greatest adversary in the Pacific. Australian Parliamentarians, generals, and all the rest of it, had been anticipating this war since around 1910, even earlier.

 

So everyone was thinking about it. And the occupation of Papua New Guinea was an excellent play to see the defense of Australia from the Japanese.

 

And so the war proceeds.

 

I mean, the war has its own history, I suppose. But the impact, the policy implications to the White Australia Policy. By the time we’ve won World War II, it was with the help of the United States and not with the United Kingdom. I mean, not only did the UK absolute scum born to rule generals, surrendered our soldiers in Singapore and led to thousands of needless deaths, then refused to relinquish our soldiers from the European campaign. Not only did they do those things to a great grievance to our country, even after all the sacrifice we gave them in World War I. Just absolutely no respect! After that it was recognised that the UK could not be relied upon for our national defense and that the United States was our new partner.

 

But in addition to that, it really just created this great sense of anxiety. After the Japanese steel had separated many Australian heads from many shoulders and many nurses were kidnapped and sold into sex slavery or shot, Australia became even more anxious of Asia than it ever had.

 

But it began to manifest in a different way at the end of the war. It was a lot of Parliamentarians were desperately trying to befriend and get on really good terms with Asiatics. And that really started the most formal way with the Colombo Plan, which was this concept of bringing in Asian students so that they could learn at our universities, become up-skilled, go back to their home countries, improve their home countries, so that the desperation of Asia stops looking over to Australia with its starvation in its eyes.

 

But at the same time that they would be an appreciation that the Asiatics that returned home building their countries would come back from Australia with a favourable impression of Australia and would be pro-Australian.

 

So the whole dynamic goes from isolation, having no friends in Asia, to we need to desperately have friends in Asia. And people started getting really self conscious about this.

 

[56:34]

 

The way the White Australia Policy was marketed, I mean, the very name of it itself became a subject of great controversy because they didn’t want to offend all of our neighbours in Asia, for fear not only the economic issue of not having trading partners and places to export our goods and materials, but also for this fear of actually the geopolitical breakdown of peace in the Pacific.

 

So I suppose that’s a general summary of what kicked off of World War II.

 

Joel Davis: It’s just so ridiculous! I mean, when have White people got offended at these Asian countries for restricting immigration from us? Like when have we complained that the Japanese don’t let White people immigrate there, …

 

Mathew Grant: Yeah, that’s right, …

 

Joel Davis: … In substantial numbers.

 

Mathew Grant: I was just going to say quickly, that it’s a really funny question you ask that, because if you read the Parliamentary debates in 1955, when the Liberal government’s getting rid of the Immigration Restriction Act, one Parliamentarian who is like the Foreign Secretary who travelled all through Asia for some years said:

 

“All the way going through Asia, the only people who ever brought up any questions or concerns about White Australia were, in fact White journalists that had followed him there to ask the question!”

 

So yeah, I think it was very overestimated how much the concept of a White Australia offended Asia. I mean, obviously the Japs didn’t like it. But after they got zapped in World War II, I think they were amicable to it. But no one else really cared. It was really the self-conscious, this new generation of post-war, limp wristed kind of rat bags that ran the country, that were really self conscious about it.

 

Joel Davis: There was some push, some resistance from the Indians back during the imperial days. He put in some complaints about our immigration policy. This is going back to the very beginnings of the 20th century. The British advised them to maybe just withdraw that. I don’t think the Australians are going to let us destroy their immigration policy because the Indians are offended [chuckling] and they didn’t want to provoke us.

 

Unfortunately, we’ve seen these days I mean, I’m jumping ahead a little bit, but unfortunately, these days it seems as though that is actually literally what is happening. Every time our wog prime minister meets with his Indian counterpart, he’s just opening up the borders more and more for the hordes to pour into the country.

 

But cycling back to the Second World War and the reaction. Obviously another key reaction to the Second World War was the concept of “Populate or Perish”. And that Australia, not only were we now partners with the United States, more primarily than the British, and that was a bit of a slower transition.

 

The US didn’t have the same imperial mentality that the English did. Obviously, even though we kind of perceived racial ties, they were trying to de-emphasise their racial identitarianism in the post-war era themselves, because they were trying to become these enlightened leaders of the liberal world order at the time and compete with communism. And they had this approach of combating communism from the Left, trying to prove to the coloured races of the world that in fact, it was the liberal world order that was truly anti-racist, even more so than the Communists.

 

And also with the legacy of the Second World War, the reconstruction of ideological legitimacy around the defeat of National Socialist Germany and all the implications that that had.

 

[1:00:03]

 

And so even though the American people, in many respects, American grassroots nationalism was very much in line with the tendencies in White Australia. The American political elite who we actually had to deal with, they were moving, unfortunately, in this very anti-racialist direction.

 

And I think that was also a contributing factor to our elite trying to, in its mind, update itself to the new ideals of the new world. The new world in the sense of the postwar international order. But the “populate or perish” element was interesting because that idea was that:

 

“Well, we’re going to open the border, but just to other Europeans.”

 

Where before we weren’t so keen on Italians and Greeks and Poles, now we’ll let them in because their countries have all been ruined by the Second World War. A lot of them are looking to get out and have a fresh life. Australia is a land of opportunity, cheap land, massive industrial projects are underway.

 

And you can see why that was attractive to a lot of them to get out of the blown up Europe that was still gripped by now the Cold War and all the hostility that brought to come out to Australia and make a new life for themselves.

 

And so we have these massive waves of quote, unquote, “wog migration”. Also at this time, jews start pouring into Australia at a rate that hitherto hadn’t happened. There were some Anglo jewish elements that had come over prior to the Second World War, but they were in very small number and largely quite assimilated as far as jews go, and didn’t seem to cause too much problems.

 

However, the jews that come over after the Second World War, a lot of them were Communist jews from Eastern Europe and they were bringing with them the ideologies and sensibilities of Central and Eastern European jewry and everything that went along with that at that time in history. So they became very active in the communist movement here, which obviously never really rose to considerable prominence in Australian society.

 

But nevertheless, it didn’t take them very long to infiltrate our government and start shipping off national secrets to the Soviet Union, which was the reason why we actually had to set up ASIO in the first place. Previously, we had such a high trust society that you could just trust your fellow Anglo Australian brothers to not betray your nation like that. But that started to change and we get this gradual undermining of the pre-war Australian identity.

 

[1:02:18]

 

Also, I talked about this a little bit on the show with Blair, this article that I read in The Occidental Observer by Jason Cannon. A three part series called Jews in the Australian Dream, talking about how a lot of these jewish immigrants to Australia, they brought high rise living, they brought cosmopolitan, high density living to Australia that they were accustomed to in European cities where they came from. Previously, Australian society was quite hostile to high density city living.

 

In fact, not many people really did live close in the actual city centre. You had, like, townhouses for the working class in the surrounding suburbs, but they weren’t high rises. You still had a little backyard, you could have a little family in there. The church was the largest building in the general vicinity.

 

Now, all of a sudden, these high rise apartments are getting put in the postwar era, about 50% of the high rise apartments that were built in Sydney, and obviously this was mainly a Sydney and Melbourne thing, were built either by jewish architects or by development companies run by jews. And they were built basically in the jewish areas around King’s Cross, in Sydney, in Melbourne, around St Kilda and some of these areas. And that radically transformed Australian society because now you have this cosmopolitanism, you got like the boomer counterculture of the 1960s, the spread out, suburban, largely Christian, White Australian lifestyle was disintegrating.

 

During the 60s, there was a study done on church attendance, or youth group attendance, actually, in Brisbane. And at the beginning of the 1960s, something like 75% to 80% of young people attended their local church youth group. By the end of the 1960s, that number was down to only 30%.

 

So you see, youth culture fundamentally transform. The television comes in, the media landscape changes this new American led international order, English speaking culture gets Beamed into the country.

 

And at the same time, there are all of these threats that you mentioned in the existential position that Australia found itself in. From a geopolitical standpoint, these are the conditions whereby we start seeing the gradual erosion of White Australia.

 

But obviously, there is still specific actors in the political system who are responsible. So, Matthew, who do you fundamentally blame? Because John Curtin was a staunch advocate of White Australia, he took us through the Second World War. The quotations from the man, the speeches from the man. We know where he stood.

 

And Robert Menzes*, who got back the Prime Ministership afterwards, he is somewhat to blame, but he also nevertheless understood the importance of maintaining White Australia. Particularly for him, it was the Anglo-Celtic British identity aspect. But the floodgates didn’t exactly just open immediately after the Second World War. It was this very gradual process. And then really only the floodgates opened to foreign migration in the 70s.

 

[* Robert Menzies Australian politician, 12th Prime Minister of Australia (1894-1978) Sir Robert Gordon Menzies was an Australian politician and lawyer who served as the 12th prime minister of Australia from 1939 to 1941 and 1949 to 1966. He held office as the leader of the United Australia Party in his first term, and subsequently as the inaugural leader of the Liberal Party of Australia, which he was responsible for establishing and defining in policy and political outreach. Source: Wikipedia]

 

So if you could set it up play by play, who are the key actors responsible here?

 

[1:05:17]

 

Mathew Grant: Yeah, that’s right. Well, I’ll touch on the jews first because you had a bit to say about them. It’s actually really fascinating!

 

I’m not sure if you’ve ever read, I mean, as much as I hate the man Churchill, if you’ve ever read Zionism versus Bolshevism, but he touches on a really interesting subject which you’ve kind of touched on. Which is like this idea of the international jew, the rootless jew, who ascribes himself to this kind of Trotskyite, world-wide revolution kind of Marxism.

 

And then there was the English jew, the naturalised jew in the United Kingdom, who didn’t have that kind of state of mind and in fact was somewhat of a contributor to the country. And Churchill had this view of zionism as being a solution to all these rootless jews to make them feel like they have some possession over some soil and their own ethnic identity and all the rest of it.

 

Because before World War II, there were a lot of prominent jews in Australia that were absolutely staunch advocates and defenders of the White Australia Policy. So, I mean, number one of this is the great Isaac Isaacs*, who was our first Governor General and a High Court justice, who not only gave lip service to the White Australia Policy, but in court, he actively was involved in cases leading to the deportation of Asiatics from Australia.

 

[* Sir Isaac Alfred Isaacs, was an Australian lawyer, politician, and judge who served as the ninth Governor-General of Australia, in office from 1931 to 1936. He had previously served on the High Court of Australia from 1906 to 1931, including as Chief Justice from 1930. Isaacs was born in Melbourne and grew up in Yackandandah and Beechworth. Source: Wikipedia]

 

So there was definitely a heavily assimilated, … I mean, you got General John Monash, who was someone of jewish extraction who fought in the war. He was the first one to kind of revolutionarily use planes, tanks and men in good sequence to save Australian lives.

 

So it’s really fascinating! You have these guys that were before the war, that were kind of sympathetic to Australia, that were in favour of this concept of a White Australia. Then after the war, there’s this influx of real nasty personalities. There’s an interesting case, Egon Kisch.* He’s an Austrian jew who is in the Communist International. He tried to do a tour of Australia to kind of spur up the Communist Party here and all the rest of it. And when he gets to the immigration official, the immigration official says:

 

“Okay, cool, no worries. Can you say the Lord’s Prayer in Scottish Gaelic?”

 

[Image: Egon Kisch in Melbourne in 1934]

[* Egon Erwin Kisch (29 April 1885 – 31 March 1948) was an Austrian and Czechoslovak [jewish] writer and journalist, who wrote in German. He styled himself Der Rasende Reporter (The Racing Reporter) for his countless travels to the far corners of the globe and his equally numerous articles produced in a relatively short time (Hetzjagd durch die Zeit, 1925), Kisch was noted for his development of literary reportage, his opposition to Adolf Hitler, and his Communism. Source: Wikipedia]

 

And [chuckling] of course, he couldn’t. You could use any European language in the dictation test. It wasn’t actually just five, it was any European language. And Kisch was deported.

 

But in his stead, it was appealed to the High Court. And after a long series of cases, it was argued that Scottish Gaelic was not, in fact, the European language and he had to be given a more fair test.

 

[1:08:08]

 

Anyway, he ended up coming in and giving a couple of speeches. But definitely jews were a bit of a concern to Australia, particularly because of their kind of communist leanings. As Churchill picked up in Zionism versus Bolshevism, most Bolsheviks were of jewish extraction and they were very concerned about Communism coming to Australia.

 

The Department of Immigration had the same chairman for 15 years, from 1946 onwards. His name was Tasman Hayes, and he was very strict. When Australians were going through these refugee camps in Europe after the war, they had a little tick box on their form of “Aryan non-jewish descent”, and that was part of our immigration policy.

 

So you did see a little bit of an influx of some jews who managed to slip through the cracks. And a lot of them were quite subversive because they were the East European jews that had no loyalty to Australia or to our, I suppose, British roots.

 

Joel Davis: By the way, they didn’t just slip through the cracks. There were international jewish networks, many of them based in the United States, which actively funded and supported jews to immigrate to Australia. So that’s another element as well.

 

Prior to the Second World War, Australia or the Immigration Department would analyze the physiognomy of applicants, and if they looked a little too jewish or they had a jewish sounding name, then they would make sure that they didn’t get through.

 

And a lot of those people were still working there, obviously, and things like what you just mentioned as well. So they actually needed that kind of institutional support to get in. But somehow a whole massive series of them still managed to get in despite all of that.

 

Mathew Grant: Not [chuckling] helpful! But yeah, anyway, so that’s one thing. Those Eastern European jews, obviously with this whole post World War II schizophrenia about the “Holocaust” and all the rest of it, I think that the victimhood psychology and their existing Bolshevist kind of tendencies led to them generally being subversive to any kind of nationalist political movement. So there’s the jews.

 

They’re definitely a part of the whole series of events. But I’m never one person to attribute everything to them. I think there was a lot of other forces at play. And one of the big ones being the commercial interests.

 

So we had really started scratching the bottom of the barrel. So after World War II we got a good influx of Europeans, but then in the post-war construction, the reconstruction of Europe, migration numbers kind of started to plummet. And so we started going to know Mediterranean migrants and then we kind of soaked all of the willing and suitable ones from those kind of extractions. So you had industries that wanted labour and then you have the perennial kind of corporatists who want to bring in non-unionised, scab labour. So they were definitely advocating behind the scenes in every Chamber of Commerce and all the rest of it. They were all advocates for bringing an end to the White Australia Policy.

 

Then you have the Democratic Labour Party [DLP]. So they were a so-called anti-communist split off from the Australian Labour Party. So they actually were very staunchly Roman Catholic. They were led by BA Santamaria* and they had an event where they were trying to get a Japanese Bishop to come to Australia, to do a kind of a country mass out near Wagga. And the Bishop was refused entry, basically on the premise of a White Australia.

 

 

[Image: B. A. Santamaria (14 August 1915 – 25 February 1998) ]
[* Bartholomew Augustine Santamaria, usually known as B. A. Santamaria, or Bob Santamaria, was an Australian Roman Catholic anti-communist political activist and journalist. He was a guiding influence in the founding of the Democratic Labour Party, the party that split from the Labour Party in the 1950s. Source: Wikipedia]

 

[1:12:10]

 

So the DLP were the first party after the Communist Party to try and get rid of the White Australia Policy. So they were lobbying on one side, and while at the same time they sucked resources and votes out of the actual Labour Party who were still staunch advocates of a White Australia.

 

I think the biggest nail in the coffin for White Australia practically was just the final election loss of Arthur Calwell.*

 

[Image: Calwell as Leader of the Labour Party Opposition]

[* Arthur Augustus Calwell KCSG (28 August 1896 – 8 July 1973) was an Australian politician who served as the leader of the Labour Party from 1960 to 1967. He led the party through three federal elections, losing each one in turn.

In his final year in Parliament, Calwell made several statements regarding non-white immigration to Australia. In March 1972 he publicly endorsed British Conservative MP Enoch Powell’s views on race, later describing the United Kingdom as having experienced a “black tragedy”. In May 1972, in response to comments from customs minister Don Chipp supporting a multi-racial society, Calwell released a statement strongly opposing non-white migration to Australia, stating that he was “appalled” at the thought and was “opposed to the creation of a chocolate-coloured Australia”. In a subsequent interview with The Canberra Times, he stated that non-white migrants would lower community living standards as they “live on the smell of an oily rag and breed like flies”. Source: Wikipedia]

 

So Calwell went to the national election on the policy of a White Australia. I think the national psyche had kind of changed. The Vietnam War is just kicking off. The DLP is saying:

 

“We have to fight communism. And to do that we have to be best friends with everyone in Asia, which means we can’t have a racial immigration policy.”

 

Then you got the new generation, the baby boomers, all these university students who are absolutely obsessed with how exotic foreign people are.

 

And I think the Colombo Plan, that plan I mentioned earlier, which I think on fundamentals is a pretty good concept, I think a lot of university students, they really had a hard on for some of their visitors from Asia and really just hated this concept of a stagnant kind of British descent, White Australia. They wanted some excitement! They were bored! Post World War II, the most wealthy, the most secure, probably the height of prosperity in our civilisation’s history. So people get bored, they want something exotic.

 

Joel Davis: They’re all on drugs!

 

Mathew Grant: Yeah, they’re all on drugs, “how good is the food”, all the standard cultural tropes from them.

 

So you have all these different prongs coming out. And the only stalwart defenders of White Australia, the Australian Workers Union and Calwell’s leadership of the Labour Party. And Calwell dies in 1973. He’d already handed over the reins to Gough Whitlam*.

 

It’s interesting, in the Parliamentary debates, when they’re talking about immigration, Gough Whitlam was actually quite staunch on the immigration issue, which you wouldn’t think because he’s kind of credited with bringing an end to White Australia. I think definitely this is in the late 60s when he’s doing this. And he really changed his tone when the 70s rolled around.

 

[* Australian politician, 21st Prime Minister of Australia (1916-2014) Edward Gough Whitlam was the 21st prime minister of Australia, serving from 1972 to 1975. He held office as the leader of the Australian Labour Party, of which he was the longest-serving. Wikipedia]

 

So there was deception from all sides. But I do genuinely feel like people had lost sympathy for it. Definitely the institutions had. I think the average person was definitely still a supporter of the principles of a White Australia, but they’d also become very self conscious about it. And the way the media spun it was that the White Australia Policy was this:

 

“Bigoted, hateful policy for no grounds other than we hate them because we breathe!”

 

And people sucked that up. They actually thought that White Australia was based on “hate” and not based on kind of industrial and social policy considerations.

 

So by the time the 70s rolled around, 1973, Calwell dies, the Australian Workers Union takes White Australia off their platform and it all goes into freefall from there!

 

But, yeah, I really don’t think you can really attribute it to any one event. You have lots of these different events playing in unison. I mean, you’re getting pressure from the United States at the same time, they were actively lobbying against the policy, particularly in the later stages of World War II, when they wouldn’t let black sailors off the American ships when they landed in Sydney Harbour. That caused a lot of kerfuffle.

 

And when Harold Holt was in, the American President, I believe, brought up some concerns about White Australia. So we were just getting nailed from every side about it, really. That’s probably my synopsis on it.

 

[1:16:11]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And I think just the general spirit of the times, unfortunately, internationally, this tendency towards the kind of greater cosmopolitanism, youth focused culture, the new mass media environment. Yeah, it was like this perfect storm. Obviously, at the same time that it was being undermined in Australia, the borders are starting to get opened across the entire Western world in one way or another through that time period. And that can’t be a coincidence, right? So obviously it would have to be a complex thing.

 

I do also want to mention (((Walter Max Lippmann*))), who was prominent due a great five part series in The Occidental Observer to direct you to another one which I’ve spoken about many times before, written by Brenton Sanderson, The War on White Australia** a Case Study in the Culture of Critique. Highly recommended! Brilliant, brilliant write up!

 

[* Walter Max Leopold Lippmann AM MBE (1919–1993) was a jewish and ethnic community leader and advocate of multiculturalism in Australia, Walter was born in Hamburg, Germany and moved to Melbourne, Australia in 1938. He was a member of the Commonwealth Immigration Advisory Council during the years 1967–74, and chaired its committee on community relations during the years 1973–75. He was a member of the committee to review the Special Broadcasting Service during the period 1983-84. He helped to establish and became chairman of the Ethnic Communities’ Council of Victoria during the period 1974-83, and held senior positions in the Federation of Ethnic Communities’ Councils. Source: Wikipedia.
He received, in the 1987 Australia Day Honours, an MBE (Member of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire) for service to the welfare of ethnic communities.]

 

[** https:// www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/09/06/the-jewish-war-on-white-Australia-colin-tatz-and-the-genocide-charge-part-one /]

 

He talks in part three about Walter [Max] Lippman, the jewish architect of Australian multiculturalism.

 

Now there’s another figure, El Grassby*. He was of, I think, Spanish descent, who generally speaking is kind of held up as the father of Australian multiculturalism.

 

[* Albert Jaime Grassby, AM (12 July 1926 – 23 April 2005) was an Australian politician who served as Minister for Immigration in the Labour Whitlam government. He completed reforms in immigration and human rights, and is often known as the father of Australian “multiculturalism”. He gained notoriety by acting as an agent of influence for the Calabrian criminal network that murdered anti-drugs campaigner Donald Mackay. Source: Wikipedia]

 

However, that’s probably for political correct reasons. He’s not jewish, so he’s easier to blame. Obviously he’s still just as responsible.

 

Mathew Grant: And Spanish too are to blame!

 

Joel Davis: [chuckling] So many people are to blame. But Lippman, I think, is important to note. I mean, he was a German jewish refugee who came just before the Second World War broke out, actually. Prominent member of the jewish community down in Melbourne. Active in their organisations and so on. And elevated through those networks, ultimately into being appointed during the Whitlam government in the early seventies to run the immigration department. With him in, all of the racists that were in the Immigration Department were flushed out! Because again, as we were saying, it was bureaucratically enforced. It wasn’t hard law so much as the law empowered the bureaucracy to exercise discretion, generally speaking.

 

[118:13]

 

And so it was really dependent upon the quality of individuals and the culture of the Immigration Department more so than anything else. And he wrote articles around the same time talking about how:

 

“A multicultural society is necessary for the jews to feel comfortable in the country because otherwise they’re going to be marginalised by the domination of Anglo Saxon cultural superiority.”

 

Yeah, and obviously you got the post “Holocaust” psychosis going on at the same time. This is also important to take into consideration and as the emergence of this pluralist ideology, the figures behind it.

 

We should have mentioned this before, perhaps when we’re talking about World War I and World War II, but there was a consciousness that they were fighting for White Australia. Everything was justified in those terms. And you look at what we have today of documents of some of the war propaganda and so on, and it was incredibly racial the way that it was portrayed to the Australian people to get people to go and fight those wars and to moralise the soldiers. And the bodies that represented the soldiers were staunch in their advocacy. The RSL, the Return Services League, still had senior representatives speaking in defense of the White Australia Policy. Still in the 80s! I talked about this a little bit in The Joel and Blair Show that we did back on Anzac Day, for obvious reasons.

 

But yeah, obviously their political influence was more prominent immediately after the Second World War, but it started to decline and the popularity of Australian veterans hit an all time low with the unpopularity of the Vietnam War, obviously. So their political capital was at an all time low at the absolute worst possible time., …

 

Mathew Grant: It’s interesting, sorry. It’s interesting with Vietnam as well, because when Vietnam first kicked off, it was really popular. And Calwell and the Labour Party, who supported a White Australia, were dead against going into Vietnam. And that’s considered one of the big reasons why they lost that election, which led to Caldwell having to abdicate to Gough Whitlam. So it’s another interesting play in it.

 

Like, obviously Vietnam became quite unpopular later, but it was Calwell’s refusal to send Australian troops into Vietnam which was a big contributor to them losing, which then kind of shook up the Labour Party after they lost a couple of elections back to back. It really made Calwell’s policies seem like outdated, unpopular. White Australia being part of the unpopular thing that needs to be thrown into the dust bin.

 

But yeah, go on. Sorry.

 

Joel Davis: That’s a good interjection because it’s an important context because this is the Cold War period. Right?

 

So the accusations to the Left that they aren’t sufficiently anti-communist were obviously very potent at that time, and particularly with the DLP thing that you described and them breaking away to kind of get a picture of the political climate at the time. Also in the 70s, when we were starting to really bring in non-White migrants, really for the first time in large quantities, one of the key selling points and one of the main demographics was the Vietnamese, that:

 

“We wrecked their country, we owe it to them!”

 

And so on.

 

[1:21:28]

 

Mathew Grant: A lot of the South Vietnamese refugees were very anti-communist, which was seen as another playing card in their deck. That’s why a lot of people supported, like a lot of DLP types, the anti-Communists. They’re so anti-communist, they’ve become colour-blind and they’ll take in any anti-communist in the world.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, you still have that today, right? With Conservatives talking about “based minorities”. You see that quite often with people like Mark Latham and they’re like:

 

“Oh, epic! And based brown people hate homosexuals just as much as we do. That’s so great!”

 

Yes, we’re getting to the kind of tragic component of the story. And I guess really White Australia, it came into being as we described in the 19th century, as a political concept through struggle. And it was almost like at the end of World War II, we had so much prosperity. I mean, Australian prosperity was at a scale that was really only matched by the United States.

 

Even to this day, despite all the damage that’s been done to our economy, our GDP per capita is higher than pretty much any European country, I think, except like Switzerland and Luxembourg and those kinds of countries. And it’s very close to the American levels. Plus we have a European style Welfare State on top of that, unlike the Americans.

 

So incredible prosperity in Australia. And that’s after so much damage has been done. Back in the mean it was incredible! We truly lived in, from an economic standpoint, a utopia. The boomers had it good! And much like the cosmopolitan Brits in London that had no concept of the impact of this importation of foreign races, non-White races into the country, they also, I think, lacked this perception. And it’s a lack of perception that you see to this day in the White upper middle class who live in some of the gentrified intercity areas and the only non-Whites they have to deal with are high IQ, successful non-Whites who don’t seem so bad.

 

Meanwhile, the White working class out in places like Western Sydney have to deal with the actual reality.

 

[1:23:36]

 

But yeah, in the 80s you do see a little bit of pushback starting to come online, some prominent academic defenders of White Australia emerge. You see a figure like John Howard who was in opposition at the time making some pretty charged comments on the subject of immigration. Conservatives getting more muscular in their opposition.

 

So the Labour Party, which under Paul Keating, you know, really pushed into the:

 

“Australia has to move into being a part of Asia.”

 

And the Asianification of Australia and really doubling down on multiculturalism.

 

And with the end of the Cold War, “end of history”, global liberal internationalist, the ideology that we’re accustomed to now really came through with Keating. And in response to that you get the One Nation Party. So even though the One Nation Party didn’t advocate for a return to the White Australia Policy, they were obviously representative of that tendency. An echo of those tendencies meant much of the rhetoric from Pauline Hanson* when she first emerged onto the scene as a national political figure. There were echoes of Labour Party rhetoric from the 60s and earlier. People like Ben Chifley and so on, I think, who she directly quoted in her maiden speech. And I think her speech writers were guys that, I think the main speech writer – I can’t remember his name, unfortunately you might know who he was – wrote that “Swamped by Asians” speech** that she gave, famous.

 

[* Pauline Lee Hanson (née Seccombe, formerly Zagorski; born 27 May 1954) is an Australian politician who is the founder and leader of One Nation, a Right-wing populist political party. Hanson has represented Queensland in the Australian Senate since the 2016 Federal Election.]

[** MP Pauline Hanson called for an end to multiculturalism, foreign aid and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission in her maiden address to Parliament (1996)

‘I believe we are in danger of being swamped by Asians,’ she said.

‘They have their own culture and religion, form ghettos and do not assimilate.’]

 

Mathew Grant: I remember his face, but not the name!

 

Joel Davis: I think he used to work for Graeme Campbell* who set up the Australia First Party after leaving the Labour Party as one of these old racist Labourites that are no longer welcome.

 

[* Graeme Campbell (born 13 August 1939) is an Australian “far-Right” politician. Campbell represented the seat of Kalgoorlie in the Australian House of Representatives from 1980 to 1998 as a member of the Australian Labour Party. Campbell later founded the nationalist Australia First Party, before joining Pauline Hanson’s One Nation. Source: Wikipedia]

 

Mathew Grant: Yeah, there was a few of them, [chuckling] yeah.

 

Joel Davis: And so One Nation came on board and it was a bit of a flash in the pan. It was interesting to get your reflections on the 90s and White populism coming back into vogue.

 

Mathew Grant: Yeah, there’s a really bit of interesting history there. And a reasonable amount of it is captured in Dr. Jim Salem’s PhD thesis which is like a contemporary study of the far-Right in Australia.

 

But you had all sorts of groups, you had Australians against further immigration and that was a political party that got stacks of votes! One Nation ended up sucking most of their votes up. And then the Liberal Party started playing the game to win their votes back. And that was part of Howard’s crusade to try and bring votes back. But you did still have some of these old hangout kind of nationalists in the Labour Party.

 

So, you mentioned Graeme Campbell. Another one was John Fischer. He was in the Western Australian Parliament and he said:

 

“You cannot have a nation where the only shared value is the fact that there are no shared beliefs! The importance of a clear definition is now more urgent. And due to the disastrous federal policies of multiculturalism imposed on us by major political parties since the Whitlam era, multiculturalism is the negation and the rejection of a shared national identity.”

 

So you do get some dudes in the back ranks, which is still kind of causing a bit of a fuss. And there is some voting outbursts like Australians against further immigration. One Nation. Then you get some of the more exotic, like, National Socialist Democratic Australian Party. There’s all these weird kind of dudes that are kind of role playing as 1930s Germans, but in Australia.

 

[1:27:22]

 

So there’s a few of those little parties floating around. But overall it does seem to become like the majority of Australians, you know, Bob Hawke* and Paul Keating**, these trendy Labour prime ministers were fully on board with Asianisation. And so I think a lot of the country went with them. Because particularly Bob Hawke was probably our most loved prime minister for a very long time, just because he could shoot a pint of beer real quick and created Medicare.

 

[* Robert James Lee Hawke AC GCL (9 December 1929 – 16 May 2019) was an Australian politician and trade Unionist who served as the 23rd prime minister of Australia from 1983 to 1991. He held office as the leader of the Australian Labour Party (ALP), having previously served as the president of the Australian Council of Trade Unions from 1969 to 1980 and president of the Labour Party national executive from 1973 to 1978.
During the period of 1973 to 1979, Hawke acted as an informant for the United States government. According to Coventry, Hawke as concurrent leader of the ACTU and ALP informed the US of details surrounding labour disputes, especially those relating to American companies and individuals, such as union disputes with Ford Motor Company and the black ban of Frank Sinatra. Source: Wikipedia]

 

[** Paul John Keating (born 18 January 1944) is an Australian former politician who served as the 24th prime minister of Australia from 1991 to 1996, holding office as the leader of the Australian Labour Party (ALP). He previously served as the treasurer of Australia under Prime Minister Bob Hawke from 1983 to 1991 and as the seventh deputy prime minister of Australia from 1990 to 1991. Source: Wikipedia.

 

[Image: Australian jewish billionaire Anthony Pratt has Keating on his list of “consultant” payments to him of $25,000 a month and to Tony Abbott of $8000 a month after his hiring in June 2019. Source: https:// www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/being-rich-is-my-superpower-tapes-reveal-pratt-is-pursuit-of-the-powerful-20231017-p5ecwv.html]

 

So you had the general population kind of being raised with like a negative reflection on their recent history. So you already have the media and the education game in full force. So the loyalty to the concepts of a wide Australia really become lost.

 

And then the typical conservative just talking about immigration generally and civic nationalism starts to become more of a force to play in the 90s.

 

But yeah, it goes on and it just quietly dies in the background. I think a lot of nationalism, a lot of groups and causes were kind of discredited with their own autism.

 

So it’s a bit of a shame.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I was reading about the 90s recently and there was a study that was done because I was reading about the formation of the Australian property lobby in the 90s, which they really got organised in response to the sudden emergence of Pauline Hanson.

 

And people who are younger and don’t really know about that time, Hansen was a nobody that burst onto the scene in 1996 and just simply because she was just some random fish and chip shop lady that was preselected for the Liberals in a seat they didn’t expect to win, who came out and started talking about the problems with Aboriginals and with immigrants and the media went ballistic against her. The Liberal Party removed their endorsement. She ran as an independent and won! The people were behind her.

 

And then all of a sudden, this One Nation Party infrastructure was just kind of smashed together through different elements very quickly and rapidly. And because it was kind of put together by grifters and inexperienced political figures, including Hansen herself, it didn’t have any staying power, it was a total disaster and it fell apart as quickly as it was put together.

 

[1:30:00]

 

 

But in the Queensland election, I believe in 96 or 98, they did get like a quarter of the vote! Which is insane for some brand new political party, obviously. So it showed the appetite in the electorate. There was a study done, I think, in 1994 on immigration and what they found was that 71% of Australians wanted radical reductions to immigration.

 

So immigration was wildly unpopular! And no one was giving the people a voice. And then even this awkward, politically inexperienced, gaff machine woman comes on the scene and just makes a few noises in the right direction and becomes a political force that shakes the foundations of Australian politics for the subsequent decade.

 

So that shows how the sentiments in the general Australian population were still relatively racially conscious, despite everything even in the 90s. I think we should look at that, its tragic in many respects at how much of a missed opportunity it was and how poorly handled it was and how we’ve inherited basically nothing, almost from the people who were involved back then.

 

But it should also be a cause for some optimism because of how quickly it was able to kind of shoot up in political relevance, that if it could be replicated with better organisation, that who knows what could happen.

 

But in those days, Australia was still over 90% White. And even the Australia that I grew up in, I was born in 1995. When I was a young child in the 2000s in the areas in where I grew up and lived and so on, pretty much everyone was White. It was kind of strange to see a non-White person, even though I lived in suburban Melbourne and suburban Sydney. And then gradually the floodgates opened and, … There’s about 20 million White people in Australia today.

 

But there’s about 7 million non-Whites in Australia, more or less. And thankfully, I think less than 2 million of them actually have citizenship.

 

But obviously now we’ve got Albanese opening the floodgates into the country at unprecedented levels. We’ve got immigration rates now that are three times the national record on a yearly basis in this kind of post Covid era. Anti-immigration politics is coming back to the fore and a new kind of identitarianism is becoming internationally popular because the reality that there is this global replacement of the White race across the entire Western world is dawning on everyone! Whether you want to take whatever kind of reaction you want to take to it it’s gotten past the stage where people could just ignore it. It’s now becoming just a reality of life that everyone has to accept and now we have to make the debate is around the value judgements and the response.

 

And today, though, traditionally White Australia was very much focused on economic issues. And there are some economic issues that are quite egregious, which are caused by immigration today. The speed in which they’re bringing people in is obviously causing a housing crisis in Australia. Now we’re recording this 15 July 2023. Rents are flying up at record levels in Sydney and Melbourne. There’s wage stagnation even though we’re having an inflation crisis and it’s an economic mess from the Covid recovery mixed with mass immigration.

 

[1:33:37]

 

There’s something like a million foreign students in Australia right now. So many Indians pouring in through student visas, taking all of these low skilled jobs. We got the Chinese buying up neighbourhoods, we got Indians buying up neighbourhoods, White people moving into, there’s less and less options within the cities for young White families. Birth rates are at an all time low. We’re in a very bad position. And it’s become, as I said at the beginning, in the minds of the Australian political elite and media establishment you’re an “extremist” if you’re loyal to this idea of White Australia, if you have a racial identitarian worldview when it comes to politics.

 

So under this context, how much of what we’ve discussed in Australian history do you think we can draw upon? Because I think there is a certain kind of post class, post material element to identitarian politics today where even despite all of these economic machinations, the average Australian is still pretty well off. It’s more of an existential threat, a cultural threat, a way of life threat. It is an economic issue as well, but I don’t think that’s enough of a motivating factor.

 

And I think that the story that we just told of describing how White Australia was preserved despite all of its opposition for the first half of this country’s existence and then how it was destroyed, was that in the first half of this country’s existence it was explicitly racial identitarian. We you mentioned some quotes. I mentioned some quotes, but every political leader at that time was a White nationalist! And they did not pull any punches. They were explicit.

 

And then we get the phase in the 50s, 60s, 70s, where it becomes you have to talk around the issue and you can’t speak about it directly. We talked about Pauline Hanson. That’s the ultimate politics of talking around the issue where:

 

“No, I’m not racist! And it’s no immigration without assimilation. And the problem is that they’re not assimilating!”

 

But now the One Nation Party is running Indians in elections in New South Wales to try and win the Indian vote because according to Mark Latham, the leader of the One Nation Party in New South Wales, Indians have family values and nationalism. And these are One Nation values, apparently. So they’ve completely acquiesced.

 

But the point is that the civic nationalism, the economic nationalism wasn’t enough. It wasn’t enough ultimately to preserve White Australia. And I’ve also talked a bit recently about how if you look at the voter demographics, non-English speaking immigrants vote for the Left at like a 20% higher rate voting for the Labour Party than either English speaking immigrants to Australia or Australian born who vote basically the same way if you control for average income.

 

So the Right-wing has totally abandoned, … You talked about Howard and you’re probably seeing a similar thing with Dutton. Well, they’ll dog whistle certain anti-immigration sentiments while they’re in opposition to maintain political legitimacy. But when they get in they’re beholden to the same big business interest that they always have been, and they’re going to keep pouring the immigrants in.

 

So how do we learn from our history? What can we take into 2023 and beyond? How can we bring back White Identity Politics to Australia in light of all of this?

 

[1:37:28]

 

Mathew Grant: Yeah, well, good question. I think the first thing worth noting is that during the days of Bob Hawke and Keating in the we did have all these kind of nationalist sympathies getting around and different groups.

 

And although we haven’t been handed much of an inheritance other than some good ideological groundwork which has been done by a lot of kind of Nativist nationalists in the last 30 years. What we have been inheriting from them, to those that are willing to listen and those willing to read and understand is a lot of lessons learnt about practical organisational skills and ideological issues.

 

So there has been some things handed to us. Because nationalists really had to restart after the Labour Party dropped White Australia. A whole new cadre of completely fresh people had to reinvent the wheel and create a political machine. I mean, Australia’s modern context is not too far off from the historical context. I mean, in the 1890s in Australia, there was also a housing crisis and there was cause for the progressive land tax and there was arguments about immigration affecting housing affordability and labour costs and all the things that Philip Lowe* was talking about the other day.

 

[* Reserve Bank of Australia governor Philip Lowe has warned that not enough homes are being built to house an influx of migrants, predicting that rents will continue to rise in a further hit to household budgets. Source: https:// www.afr.com/policy/economy/philip-lowe-is-housing-market-warning-20230405-p5cya0]

 

I think one of the big things, if we take the economics out of this situation, we forget the fact that 7/11 was paying Indians $0.75 an hour a couple of years ago, according to some news reports.

 

The issue we have to really look at now from a know, cultural, social point of view is this concept of social capital and diversity. So there is a lot of academic literature that’s coming out now.

 

I mean, the real Magna Carta in this space is Robert Putnam’s work in Diversity and Community in the 21st Century, which is a 2007 academic study into ethnic diversity and how it was found in the United States ethnically diverse neighbourhoods, all the races kind of hunker down. So it lowers a sense of trust. It lowers the sense of common identity, belonging. It reduces, I suppose, the moral and social desire for people to commit acts of charity and voluntarism. This kind of point of our civilisation where people go and do good in the private space, they create mutual associations and charities, and neighbours take care of each other, and you have street barbecues and all the rest of it. You have a common sense of belonging, identity, purpose and destiny. These things are all considered “social capital”.

 

[1:40:15]

 

And a lot of the literature now is pointing to the fact that the greater there is diversity amongst ethnicities, the lower there is social capital, the less trust there is so from the point of view, it’s actually to no one’s benefit except international finance, who benefits from cheap labour, or perhaps to the benefit of Trotskyites who have an interest in creating social upheaval so they can try and win themselves political power. It’s of no one’s interest, not even the migrants interest, to have this level of diversity. Ethnic diversity is an absolute detriment to civil society and the creation of meaningful community, especially national community.

 

I mean, even Charles Pearson, in his National Life and Character  in 1893, he comments on the fact that government and democracy becomes quite impossible when you have such divergent populations that constitute the voter base. When you have different ethnic and cultural groups that are all pulling in different directions, things become more and more radical. Similar to how it is in India. In India, you have very diverse ethnic and cultural and religious groups that are all pulling in different directions. And those directions, they manifest in the Parliament of India. But often it spills out onto the streets, into great mass mob violence. And there’s great upheaval in any instance where you have a democracy that’s racially and ethnically diverse.

 

So I think that’s the next thing we have to tap in. We learn all these things from the past. We learn the economic issues, but we’re also learning the social issues.

 

And now there’s a great body of academic work looking at this issue of social capital and diversity. And we need to make a point of that and we need to make a solid, stalwart argument for a White Australia that is a European descent country. How Henry Parks was talking about Asiatics having different institutions. If we go back to why is it important to be White? It’s important to be White because we have a valued heritage. We look at our English common law and we look at our Parliamentarian system. We look at basic liberties of the man. I hate to use the word “liberalism” because it’s obviously morphed into a great, more negative and destructive force in civilisation.

 

But the forces at play in civilisation from Rome up until probably 150 years ago, in my point of view, are positive things and those things are going to be adhered to by people of European extraction because they can always look back and say:

 

“Hey! My ancestors spilt blood for this cause!”

 

They spilt blood for the principles of our civilisation. Where people from Asia or Africa don’t have that same affinity. Their ancestors didn’t fight for Magna Carta. They didn’t fight for the Act of Settlement. They were just in know, they were living in huts and having a good time!

 

So it’s just different cultures, different ethnic groups and races have different things they value based on their heritage. And so therefore you’ll never be able to have that homogeneity and Common Purpose and identity.

 

[1:43:41]

 

Joel Davis: What we’re finding out from race realism as well, which they wouldn’t have known, didn’t have genetic modeling and things like this back in the formation of the White Australia Policy, is that it’s not just about heritage. What you said is obviously incredibly important!

 

But also what we find from race realism is that the largest genetic differences, the largest biological differences between the races have to do with neurophysiology. Not skin colour or bone structure or these kinds of things, but neurophysiology. In other words, in the aspects of our biological makeup which have the most influence over attitudes, behaviours, tendencies and so on.

 

So you can see how this would manifest in cultural and political differences, because it means we fundamentally just hardwired with different mentalities.

 

And so the preservation of our way of life is really there is a kind of conscious aspect to our heritage but also an unconscious organic aspect to our heritage which just comes through us in an involuntary way. It’s just part of who we are, that only fellow people of European descent can share with us. It’s just simply impossible for us to share that with people of other races and vice versa.

 

And that really does account for why we have such radically different civilisations. I mean, you look to the Japanese, for example, and I have a very impressive country, a very impressive civilisation. They were our ancient enemy. But now I’m quite happy actually to be allied with the Japanese. I find them to be a respectable people.

 

And now, other than the United States, they are probably our next best ally, frankly. And you could see in their culture, it’s a very developed, very impressive culture, but it’s radically different. We can appreciate things about them and they can appreciate things about us.

 

But ultimately you can only have a Japan if it’s Japanese people.

 

And I think everyone understands that, thankfully, I think including most Japanese people still. And it’s the same for us. And if we want our children to have a way of life that is in any way analogous to what we were accustomed to when we were being raised, where my parents never had to sit me down, they probably didn’t have the ideological resources to sit me down and explain to me my heritage as Anglo Saxon or as an Australian. It just happened naturally. It was just growing up, I participated in that they’re just normal Australian people. We have a normal Australian culture and I just organically learnt about it, internalised it and so on.

 

[1:46:24]

 

No one told me you have to like cricket. I just did. No one told me it’s really nice to have a barbecue on a Saturday night. I just like doing that, you know what I mean? It’s just little things like that which might not seem like much, but they accumulate when you really add them all up together. And that is just part of who we are.

 

And it’s something which really dawned on me. Even traveling in Britain for some time in other parts of Europe and coming back to Australia, even just the differences between us and them, even though the racial stock is so similar, the people there in Denmark or in England, they look just like Australians pretty much. But even those differences are large. Then you multiply that with racial differences and it’s just incredible!

 

I think that’s really the basis of the new politics is this more advanced and developed understanding of racial and cultural difference and its importance. Because obviously with advances in air travel and other kinds of transport technology and economic development, mass immigration is so much easier than it ever was before.

 

And so we’re kind of running this experiment, this multiracial experiment in a radically new way with this anti-racist ideology kind of bolted onto it to kind of force integration.

 

And to me, it’s an issue that ultimately transcends class differences. Then, even though it is easy for the White upper class, as we mentioned before, to escape some of the consequences, they can’t escape all of them. And the longer that it goes on, the harder and harder it is going to be for these people to escape them.

 

So I guess the final thought would be to get from you before we close this up, Matthew, would be, fundamentally, when it comes to the White Australia Policy, if you had to kind of boil it down into a nutshell, its significance, because this should be our birthright. Unfortunately, it wasn’t really handed to us, but this should be our birthright. This is what our ancestors, my ancestors have been in Australia for over 200 years. I think from talking to you, it’s similar time frame, maybe even longer. Our ancestors were actually part of this building White Australia.

 

So this was supposed to be our birthright that’s being stripped away. That’s why I wanted to make this, because I really wanted there to be a resource and hopefully more resources can get developed to really impress upon this history to our people.

 

But to you, what is the essential inheritance if you had to kind of sum it up? What’s most inspirational to you about the history of the White Australia Policy and the formation of this once great nation?

 

Mathew Grant: From my point of view.

 

The most important thing to me is this creation of a national sense of community. People sharing a common sense of identity, belonging, purpose, where people shared the same worldview and outlook on life. I think it gets back to this idea of a homogeneous society being the ultimate form of a society. I think there’s nothing wrong with being friends with your neighbours and having good relationships with all sorts of cultures and ethnic groups around the world.

 

[1:49:36]

 

But I think your home and the place where you dwell, you should be principally in relations with people of your own stock. And that creates the greatest sense of community and belonging and creates the most positive attributes of our culture and human condition. People are more inclined to do acts of good work and charity and all the rest of it. But it is just essential to everything, our standard of living as decent, civilised people, and not rats working for a bowl of rice a day. That’s really important too. But the big thing to me is just the social cohesion, culture and community. That’s the biggest draw card to me.

 

Before we finish, I’d like to just read one final quote from Billy Hughes, our 7th Prime Minister of Australia, in the Parliamentary debates on the 5 July 1949. He said:

 

“I want to make it clear to the honourable members and to the people of this country that the White Australia Policy is not a mere banner waved by politicians and waved to inflame party passions. It is a living thing. White Australia is Australia! And everything that is inherent in the White Australia Policy is vital to the very existence of Australia itself.”

 

And that truly is on all levels the racial, cultural, White Australia really is Australia and everything that we hold dear to our heritage is inextricably linked to the fact that this was a European descent country.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, thank you Matthew, this was great! And you can find the website for Matthew’s organisation, the Australian Natives Association. Ausnatives.org, AUSnatives.org. I’ll put link in the description. Also I’ll put links to your Telegram and your Twitter and so on so people can go and find your social media presence. Yeah, if you’re interested in finding out about the organisation, we did a podcast, I think maybe six months ago or so, which is also on this channel talking about your organisation and the philosophy of the organisation. So if you haven’t watched that, you can go check that out.

 

But yeah, pleasure to have you on, as always and hopefully we can do another collabouration soon on another subject. I thought this was really good.

 

Mathew Grant: Yeah, great! No, it was good.

 

Joel Davis: The audience will love it. So thanks everyone for listening.

 

And by the way, if you’re watching this, you might not know that I have a second, I did mention earlier, the show that I do with Blair. I have a second YouTube channel, The Joel and Blair Show YouTube channel. You can find@youtube.com slash at Joel and Blair. And there Blair Cottrell and I every Thursday night, 08:00 p.m., we talk about Australian political news, basically for the previous week and do our kind of analysis. So check that out.

 

There isn’t too many weekly shows on Australian politics that are worth listening to. I’d like to think that the one that we do is one of the few that actually is so go and subscribe to that if you haven’t already. And thanks for listening.

 

[1:52:39]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Youtube Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/29/2023 = 28)

@zoomerboomer3109
1 day ago
Exellent stream, can be hard to find good historical discussions about Aus and NZ history. Bloody insufferable being forced to read books from the likes of James Belich.
13

@maxtrainor8401
1 day ago
Great work, can you make one on an American version of white policy?
21

1 reply

@windhoek1675
1 day ago (edited)
If you would like a book on this subject for your own reading, I’d recommend re-forging America by Lothrop Stoddard.
5

@peroercegovac1973
1 day ago
Fantastic stream. At the highest level of historicism. Well done.
6

@SteveLogan-lt8zi
1 day ago
Excellent discussion. Hopefully it is an ongoing thing.
13

@Vingul
1 day ago
Extremely interesting, great to hear so many quotations by men of the era, very relatable and relevant to us (though I’m not Australian myself).
Joel, or Matthew, what book would you recommend to understand this era and the policy? If you were to recommend only one, I guess — either an original work from the time or a later overview.
19

4 replies

@letztersohndesabendlandes7471
1 day ago
Commenting so that I get notified if anyone responds to this – also interested in going a bit deeper on nationalist Australian history.
6

@deanalessi9583
1 day ago
Australia’s awakening, thirty years in the life of an Australian agitator by William Guthrie Spence
4

@Vingul
1 day ago
@deanalessi9583 Thanks!

@jackmatthews939
23 hours ago (edited)
The Making of White Australia – P.Griffiths – Australian National University 2006
The Making of White Australia – D.Gibb – Victorian Historical Association 1975
The Administration of the White Australia Policy – A.C.Palfreeman – Melbourne University Press 1967
History of the White Australia Policy to 1920 – Myra Willard – Melbourne University Press 1978
“Be Just & Fear Not” – A.A Calwell – Wilk & Company 1972
This is probably the best book to explain what happened in Australia post WW2 & is written by a former major politician/minister covering until the 1960’s.
6

@LogosVeritas-di1yp
20 hours ago
Great work guys. Matthew grant is so very knowledgable on this topic. thanks for putting this together Joel
2

@domsanchez148
1 day ago
Great work as usual.
7

@blackriders3509
1 day ago
Well done
13

@henrylawson938
1 day ago
Let’s have a 20 yr moratorium on immigration and close down immigration, just leaving passport control and border protection.
6

2 replies

@gch8810
1 day ago
50 years would be better.
4

@EliteBuildingCompany
1 day ago
Good stream, cheers.
7

@jeffreysebranek9697
1 day ago
Hi joel. Love your shows buddy
1

@leonieblah8806
1 day ago
great video
4

@BasedYeeter42
16 hours ago
Interesting stuff, curious to know where the Lebanese would fit into this model, considering our tendency to pass off as white in comparison to our neighbors
1

1 reply

@LuciusAugustusRomanusInvictus
15 hours ago
Anecdotally it seems Christian and Muslim lebos are almost different populations but it would be stretching the definition of white to include lebos in general

@audhumbla6927
1 day ago

4

@user-jp4ci5ny3v
1 day ago
Let’s gooooooo
5

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett at The Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — Transcript

Patriotic Weekly Review – with Blair Cottrell – Dec 4, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Dangerfield – Talking Tough with Mark Collett – Mar 28, 2020 — Transcript

Mark Collett – Sam Melia Sentencing – with Laura Towler – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

Joe Marsh – Sam Melia Going into Court Before He was Sentenced – Mar 1, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

 

911 – The Jews Had Me Fooled: A Jewish Engineered Pearl Harbor

Organized jewry Did 9/11

Organized jewry Did 9/11 — The 16th Anniversary, 2017

Know More News — Christopher Bollyn, The Man Who Solved 9/11 — TRANSCRIPT

The Realist Report with Christopher Bollyn – Sep 2018 — TRANSCRIPT

Guns and Butter interviews Christopher Bollyn — The War on Terror – Dec 18, 2019 — Transcript

AE911Truth – Exposing Those Who Covered up the Crime of the Century – May 28, 2023 – Transcript

 

============================================

PDF Download

top

Total words in transcript = 18,026

• Total words in post = 20,007
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Use your browser to download/export a PDF of this post.

 

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4: Thu, May 30, 2024 — Transcript complete. Added Content list.

Version 3: Wed, May 29, 2024 — 90/113 mins of transcript complete. Added images.

Version 2: Tue, May 28, 2024 — 76/113 mins of transcript complete. Added images.

Version 1: Mon, May 27, 2024 — Published post. 60/113 mins of transcript complete. Includes Youtube comments (28).

Mark Collett: Hello, everybody, and welcome to Patriotic Weekly Review, episode number 207! And we are here live tonight on Odyssey, DLive and Radioalbion.com. And we’ve got an amazing show planned for you with an amazing guest who I’ll be introducing very, very shortly.

 

Now, if you want to contribute to this stream, if you want to help us financially, if you want to ensure that Patriotic Alternative has somebody working full-time behind the scenes to pull things together, to put on the events you love and to keep pushing nationalism as hard as we can to ensure as many people hear our message of positivity and hope, please make a donation. You can do so through Odyssey, you can do so through entropy. And any question that you ask attached to a donation or statement, I will read out live on the show myself and Joel will answer those questions in the second hour.

 

I say this every week, but the thousands of people who watch this show, if you just look at replays, the lowest viewed show that we’ve had on replay is about two and a half thousand views. And that’s just on Odyssey alone. The highest viewed show we have on replay on Odyssey alone, is 13,000 views. Some of these shows across all platforms are getting 25,000 views. If, if, everybody chipped in $3 or $5 and everyone could afford that, that’s price of a large can of Red Bull, or in Joel’s peasanty world, it’s Monster. Can’t believe he’s still drinking that mate. Red Bull for the win, my friend. That money would change everything.

 

So if you can afford a small donation of just three or $5, it’s greatly appreciated. Now, you can also donate by a crypto. All the crypto links are in the description below. They’re on BitChute. They are on Odyssey, if you’re watching on those platforms.

 

And finally, if you want to write to me, write to me mark@thefallofwesternman.com. I’m a bit behind on emails at the moment. I’ve been very, very busy. I will get to them all.

 

I know I’ve got a couple of people who’ve asked to do CVs. I will get you and I promise I will do your CV for you. Do not worry. If you need any help or you need to donate via other means, or if you want to get involved with Patriotic Alternative, you can email me there or contact through the website which is www.patrioticalternative.org UK.

 

Now, I’ve got loads of good things planned. Later this week, I’ve got a video on Diane Abbott. Diane Abbott, as we all know, she questioned a certain group of people. Well, she mildly criticised them. And now the most famous and longest serving black MP in British history is potentially going to be kicked out of the Labour Party after 36 years as a sitting Parliamentarian. All because she made a mild criticism of that certain group of people that you cannot name! That’ll be out on Friday.

 

I’m also back with David Duke. I’m always with David Duke on Friday at 04:00 pm He calls it the Fabulous Friday. I’m there. I hope you’ll be joining us.

 

[02:58]

 

And finally, I’ll be back on Sunday for the Nationalist A-Team with hopefully the usual team, but definitely with at least Sam and the Patriarch. Our young sidekick is away on holiday at the moment, I don’t know when he’s back.

 

So, saying all that, let us get into this show and we’ve got a great guest for you tonight. And we’ve got to say extra thank you to this fella because he lives in Australia, I think it’s about 05:00 am there.

 

So I don’t envy him getting up at this time. He’s got a little bit of a cold, but he’s been doing some amazing work recently. He’s been working a lot with Blair Cottrell and we’re a massive fan of Blair on this show. Blair’s a real hero of our people. This guy is an up and comer! He’s on Cozy, he is making waves there. He’s also on Odyssey, I believe. On Telegram. And his takes are always thought provoking.

 

And I always think in this movement that leading content creators like myself, it’s a duty of ours to give young lads like this guy a leg up, to give him a start, to push him out. Because it’s people like Joel who will be leading this struggle in ten to 15 years time. So, please, without further ado, Joel, how have you been? What have you been up to? What’s been going on your end? And then let’s get into the show.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so, as I said before, the show is still feeling a little frosty from Anzac Day celebrations, which were quite elaborate. And it’s a special day in Australia because Australia Day itself has become kind of attacked so much by the Left that it’s not really celebrated with vigor anymore, unfortunately.

 

Whereas Anzac Day, because it’s all about remembering the veterans, particularly of the First and Second World War, but just in general, it has more gravitas and it’s harder for the Left to denigrate, it’s harder for, I mean, they still attempt it, but it doesn’t go down anywhere near as well.

 

And so it’s the most patriotic day in the calendar for Australians. And also a time of great reflection on people who made the ultimate sacrifice to die for our country, or to die for the British Empire, basically, if they fought in either of the World Wars.

 

And so, yeah, that’s always a special day for me and I thoroughly enjoyed it and I spent it with some good nationalist friends.

 

But, yeah, also, as you said, Blair and I have been streaming every week, 08:00 pm Australian time on Thursday evenings. It’s early morning on Thursday now here, so we’ll be streaming again tonight. If anyone wants their fix of Australian political news that’s kind of the idea of the show. And I think it’s been pretty successful so far. We’re actually on YouTube now, we started out simultaneously streaming to Blair’s Odyssey and my Cozy, but we created a YouTube channel which still hasn’t been deplatformed and long may it continue.

 

So you can catch us on YouTube at the Joel and Blair Show YouTube channel.

 

[06:10]

 

But, lately there’s a referendum coming up in Australia at the end of this year for what they call The Voice, which is basically inserting this quote, unquote:

 

“Advisory council to represent Aboriginals into the Australian Constitution.”

 

But I take the view that it’s somewhat of a Machiavellian move, that the intention with it is to use kind of judicial activism to expand it’s powers, so that it goes beyond being a mere advisory board to actually having constitutional power. Otherwise, why would you put an advisory? There’s no reason for an advisory board to be put into the Constitution in the first place.

 

And so that’s really going to animate Australian politics this year, as I guess, the whole lead up to the referendum and the fight over the referendum. Because really, it’s a fight over the legitimacy of Australia’s founding and the claims from the Left of Aboriginal sovereignty.

 

Also, the chief architect of The Voice is Australia’s leading Zionist lobbyist, so he massive supporter of Zionism. Settler colonialism is great when the jews do it, but when my people do it, it’s a big problem, apparently, and we have to basically surrender to Aboriginal sovereignty.

 

So it’ll be interesting year in Australian politics for that reason, because obviously this is a very kind of existential and racial question that Australians will have to face collectively. So we’ve been talking about that a lot on the show with Blair and we’ll continue to throughout the year.

 

But, yeah, that’s basically what I’ve been doing lately.

 

Also, you didn’t mention I’m still on YouTube, by the way, and I also got my Twitter back.

 

Mark Collett: I didn’t know that you were still on YouTube. Sorry.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’m still on YouTube and I just got my Twitter back even, so I’m on all the mainstream platforms right now. So long may that last.

 

And so you can find me there as well. What do you want to talk about first? You had a few subjects.

 

[08:18]

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, I was going to comment on the Aboriginal stuff because I do find this very interesting.

 

Now, obviously, the Aboriginals are indigenous to Australia, but to suggest as in they’re indigenous to the land mass, but Australia as we know it wasn’t in any way created by them. Had White men never set foot on Australian soil and never gone to the landmass, there wouldn’t be an Australia as we know it. These people would likely, I can say this with sort of 99% certainty. They would still be living as they did hundreds or thousands of years ago. And I do find it quite interesting that there is this sort of social move to kind of connect people like the Aborigines with modern Australia and almost give them credit and ownership for it when they didn’t create it.

 

And that’s sort of in stark contrast with what we have here in Europe, where obviously Europeans, obviously White people, people of European descent, did create so many wonderful things, but are now sort of not credited with that, even though they are obviously indigenous. So every creation, because it’s interesting, every creation civilisational advancement you see in Europe was largely created by European people.

 

Equally, everything you see in Australia today that you value as Australian, with probably the exception of the didgeridoo, was created by people of European descent. And I just think it’s amazing, this hypocrisy, where there’s this absolutely feverish movement to give Aborigines these rights as indigenous people.

 

But in Europe, there is the opposite movement. There is the movement to strip indigenous people of their rights.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, it’s particularly interesting for me because it’s like, okay, if there’s indigenous sovereignty, then you have to give okay, well, then at least I have to be able to go back to Britain and have ownership. My people can have ownership of Britain, then, if we’re going to play this game of indigenous peoples have sovereignty. But no, I can’t have that either!

 

So basically, I’ve got no option. It’s like, I can go back to Britain and face the exact same anti-White policies, basically, that I get in Australia, even worse in many cases. So I really have nowhere to go. Obviously, I support the struggle in Britain just as much as I support it here, but it’s the same thing. There isn’t really an option or an out for me and for my kin.

 

So it is particularly egregious. And the thing is that we actually built Britain as well. So our claim isn’t just that we just happen to kind of rise out of the soil there, and that what’s we’re native to. It’s like, well, you know, the British people created Britain, and, you know, the British people of today inherited that from their ancestors, and I inherited Australia from my ancestors. There’s a town in Australia called Davis Town, which is literally founded by the first Davises of my paternal line to settle in Australia 200 years ago.

 

So I have, I think, a far more legitimate claim to ownership of Australia than some Aboriginal person who, frankly, just kind of walked around the bush throwing sticks at shit for the duration of their entire life.

 

Like, if I go to a National Park and just kind of roam around within it, what claim do I really have to ownership over it? Modern Australia was created by Anglo Saxon institutions and by the Anglo Celtic founding stock and everything that we created here. And, yeah, obviously people understand this argument if they’re watching the show, but it’s just particularly egregious.

 

[12:19]

 

Also, during Anzac Day yesterday, there’s this Chinese Member of State Parliament in New South Wales, which is the state that I live in, who penned this Op-Ed about how there was like 50 Chinese guys who were in the Anzac forces in Gallipoli in World War I. And so actually, Anzac Day is this multicultural celebration that Chinese Australians can have equal claim to. And it’s like:

 

“No, you can’t!”

 

The Anzacs were very clear that they were fighting for the British Empire and for White Australia.

 

And all of the kind of soldiers organisations for return services from the First and Second World War were virulent supporters of the White Australia policy. And the kind of rationale for going into the First World War from an Australian perspective was that we wanted to seat at the table in their negotiations in the event of victory. And we did have that.

 

Our Prime Minister, Billy Hughes, was at the Treaty of Versailles and argued very strongly against the Japanese delegation because the Japanese were allies in World War I who wanted some kind of racial equality cause to be entered into the Constitution of the League of Nations. We pushed hard against that because we thought it would contradict the White Australia policy. And we won that argument even though the Woodrow Wilson was actually quite supportive of the Japanese claim.

 

The British sided with us because we sided with them. We were part of the Empire. Like, our rationale for being part of the Empire was that we were like a junior part of the Empire. It would not just be in the interests of the British people, but also the Australian people as racial and ethnic kin.

 

And so that’s the context. You can’t extricate that from Anzac Day. And in the Second World War, we were fighting again another racial struggle for the future of White Australia. We didn’t want Japanese domination of the Asia Pacific region. We wanted to preserve not only the British Empire’s claims, but the other European empires that were in Asia Pacific at the time. And we aligned with the United States for the same strategic purpose. We didn’t want our region dominated by non-White people, frankly.

 

It was very clear, the statements of our political leadership, our Prime Minister explicitly during World War II, explicitly said this was a struggle for White Australia. It was not like some minor thing. It was front and centre of our politics. And in the propaganda around the war that you can find, or even in the documentation that they handed out to soldiers themselves, they had this extremely racial view of politics during those wars.

 

[15:01]

 

So that’s an interesting kind of aspect of the discourse here as well, which is that, like, Australia was founded as a White nationalist country by White nationalists, like, in a very explicit way. And in order to be a conservative in Australia, you kind of have to therefore accept that heritage. And if you stand in rejection of it, you are not a real conservative. You’re kind of rejecting the vision of the founders of the country and repudiating it as racist and evil and so on.

 

And so that provides a kind of interesting dynamic within Australian politics. There’s a kind of interesting dynamic that’s emerging here around The Voice, because on the one hand, you have the Right wing, which is against The Voice, who say that the problem with The Voice is that it’s racist, it’s dividing Australians by race, and this is contrary to colour-blind, meritocracy and classical liberal principles, or whatever.

 

And then the Left says, basically we need to pay the rent, Aboriginals need their own representation and so on. Australia got a country for free and now we owe them, we have to pay it back. And Aboriginals need to have their own representative bodies to focus on their own affairs and so on. And that’s the whole spectrum of the discourse.

 

And hopefully we can kind of leverage this kind of dynamic to present a kind of third interpretation of the discourse which is that this is basically a declaration of war against White Australia and it’s claims, a repudiation of the settlement of the country, a repudiation of the values of the founding and a direct repudiation of my sense that Australia is my birthright.

 

Hopefully, we can expand the White racial consciousness in Australia this year as the referendum kind of grips the political discourse. And for many young people will probably be the first big issue in their lifetime. A lot of people don’t really care about elections. They can be quite boring. But hopefully this issue politicizes some young people and gets people to think about politics in, …

.

 

Mark Collett: You broke up a bit there, mate, but I think we’ve can I still hear you. Give me a sound test.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, you can’t hear me.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah. No, you just broke up slightly. And roboted.

 

Well, look, I think that’s fascinating. I think there’s also a huge amount of parallels that can be drawn with America there and what America was founded to be, and the original American immigration system, which basically was Anglo Saxon Protestants, essentially, of good standing. So White men of good standing from basically Britain were allowed in, more or less, just waved through, but other people weren’t.

 

[18:04]

 

And I think the same is true with Australia. And there’s now a huge denial of this and there has been obviously, a reversal of this.

 

But let’s get into what we really wanted to talk about tonight, because the big news is obviously what’s happened with Tucker Carlson, and I think this came as a real shock to me. And there’s a few things behind the scenes. Now Tucker Carlson is obviously kind of like, I would say, would you say, the sort of boomer’s choice when it comes to sort of right of centre politics.

 

But he is very influential. I mean, Tucker Carlson was the host of the most popular news show in the whole of America and it completely dominated the ratings outside of sports and sports news, which is damn impressive! He was dwarfing any show on CNN, any show on MSNBC or any of the other networks. And he was genuinely in a position where, I wouldn’t say he could win a presidential election. I’m not saying he would be sort of a kingmaker in terms of who was going to be president, but he was certainly manoeuvring himself into a position of being kingmaker in terms of the man who could have chosen a Republican presidential candidate.

 

Then all of a sudden, out of the blue, boom, he’s fired, apparently by Murdoch himself. And there seems to be a lot of different takes across the dissident Right or the Alt-Right or whatever you want to call us on whether the sacking of Tucker Carlson is a good thing, a bad thing, or whether we should even care at all.

 

Now, I have my own takes, which I’m going to give in a second, but I’m going to throw it to you, Joel. Were you shocked when this happened? I obviously was. And what do you think the outcome of this is going to be? Where do you think Tucker is going to go after this, and what do you think motivated this?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I thought it was a big surprise. I mean, Tucker is, like Tucker is Fox News, and there isn’t an obvious candidate to replace him. If they don’t replace him with someone damn good, this could be the end of Fox News. I don’t mean like it will go out of business, but it could be the end of Fox News in its kind of dominant position over Right-wing political discourse in the United States, because nothing else on the network is anywhere near as interesting as Tucker show. He was really carrying the network. That was a surprise.

 

I did see a news article that came out recently. I think it was in Time magazine. I shared it. Wendell posted on it Telegram, and I shared it on my Telegram a couple of weeks ago, and it was talking about how the younger Murdochs, not Rupert, but some of these children are massive libtards, basically, and they resent Fox News.

 

And then as soon as they inherit Fox News, they basically want to just take it in a Leftward direction or destroy it entirely. And it’s almost like, embarrassing to them. They move in these libtard elite circles and it’s kind of embarrassing the Fox News people or whatever.

 

[21:19]

 

So that was interesting, basically saying that the capacity for the Right or something as Right-wing as Tucker Carlson, insofar as you could call being in support of gay marriage and Martin Luther King conservatism, Right-wing, even that was too much for them.

 

So the writing was on the wall. I didn’t think it’d be anywhere near this immediate. And it’s interesting to see the trigger pulled so quickly. Maybe it’s because Tucker Carlson was a DeSantis guy. Tucker Carlson did not like Trump, private leaked, …

 

Mark Collett: Well, there is a correction! There is a correction there. He was one of the people who was on the Trump train. First of all.

 

However, post January the 6th, he has done an awful lot to distance himself from Trump.

 

But in 2016, Tucker was one of the people, along with, I forget her name now, who basically called it and said:

 

“Trump is going to be the one and if he gets the nomination, he’ll win it.”

 

He was in that camp originally.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, maybe.

 

And obviously he was brought in to kind of narrate to Trump’s base a particular message that was supposed to appeal to that kind of populist conservatism, the kind of the rebranding of the Republican Party from the pre Trump iteration that was kind of voiced by Bill O’Reilly in that time slot, that kind of neocon Bush era conservatism.

 

But the private remarks that were leaked say that he basically secretly resented Trump during his whole presidency. And I think ultimately you could say like the election dispute, whatever you want to call it, was the last straw for Tucker. But that resentment had been building for many years.

 

But anyway, he always gave very good coverage to DeSantis, would have DeSantis on regularly, and has progressively distanced himself from Trump. He can’t go too far for fear of losing the audience entirely because obviously his audience is made up predominantly of Trump supporters.

 

But I think that was one of the key strategic moves that was planned for raising DeSantis as a challenge to Trump was that he would have Tucker on his side and that Tucker could start turning on Trump and this would actually sway a lot of voters.

 

But I think the whole momentum is completely shot in the DeSantis campaign. Some people are saying that DeSantis won’t even run, and people are already calling the primary for Trump and so on. His poll numbers have been really good recently and so on.

 

So perhaps the calculus of keeping Tucker on the network diminishes without DeSantis around. And the view is its more important to just ensure Biden wing Biden wins and perhaps getting rid of Tucker increases that potentiality. Because if Trump was to smoke the nomination, obviously Tucker would have to maintain support of Trump up against DeSantis and so on, because he is tribally Republican.

 

[24:41]

 

So yeah, I think that might have something to do with it. In addition to obviously, there was this jewish woman, that was Grossman, I think was her last name, could be wrong about that, who was hired into his background staff and then had a lawsuit against being discriminated against, quote, unquote:

 

“At work.”

 

Because apparently the other riders on Tucker’s team were, quote, unquote:

 

“Anti-semitic and misogynistic.”

 

Or what have you. So I’m sure that’s creating headaches there and that was kind of given as the reason. But to me, I think if they really wanted to keep Tucker, they could have kind of withstood that lawsuit and kept him going. So there has to be some other motive behind this.

 

I think it’s obvious that Murdoch is no friend to us. Ultimately, he’s a big supporter of Israel, but ultimately the rest of Fox News has shifted further and further to the Left. It’s almost a centrist, even by the shape of American political discourse. It’s really a centrist network with all the other programming. I think this could be really the end of Fox. I think Daily Wire will benefit from this. Some people have speculated that Tucker could go to Daily Wire, but I’m not sure if that’s the case.

 

But nevertheless, I think they’ll rise. Their programming is just better quality than anything on Fox. Tucker was the only thing really competing with the likes of Walsh and Shapiro and the Blaze, these kinds of kind of boutique conservative networks that have arisen in the kind of new media environment I think they’ll continue to grow.

 

And I think that’s the future of conservative cable news editorial type programming. And I think, yeah, it’s over for Fox.

 

And Tucker, without that slot on Fox, I don’t see him being very successful either, to be honest. A lot of people say:

 

“Oh, Tucker, he’s our guy, but he was adjusting his message to appease the people on Fox News and keep his job. But actually he’s more based.”

 

I disagree. If you listen to him on any podcast where he’s outside of his show format, he comes across as incredibly cucked, to be honest. There was recent remarks where he was counter signalling White Identity Politics with very lame talking points.

 

Also, he has expressed support for gay marriage and other things. He doesn’t really come across to me as a particularly Right-wing individual, and someone with a particularly serious attitude either. And I think his writing staff were the ones that actually made all the great segments that ever happened on his show, where he kind of dog whistled certain things. Particularly that ADL segment when he called out their double standard on Israel with immigration relative to the United States. That type of thing, I think, is the product of his writing team, not of his own intellect.

 

And so without that writing team, I expect him to become somewhat cringe, and I just don’t see him without the kind of prestige of being the big cable news show on Fox. I don’t see him being as successful as I said, people like Matt Walsh on Daily Wire, or when he’s kind of having to compete with them on an even playing field.

 

We saw Bill O’Reilly go from having one of the most popular cable news shows in all of the United States to being a literal nobody now. He’s still making a show every week, by the way, but no one watches it. I’m not saying it’ll be that bad for Tucker, but I don’t think it’s going to be that great for him either.

 

[00:00]

 

So I think basically Carlson and Fox both lose out of this, but maybe the Murdochs who aren’t particularly Right-wing or particularly concerned with the success of Trump or the success of the Republican Party insofar as it has this kind of populist agenda anyway, maybe it suits them and that’s why it’s happened.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I found the Tucker thing really interesting because obviously networks are businesses. These networks aren’t there to lose money and they’re not there to get to the top and then stack their most popular presenters and tank their shows. So I find it very funny that he’s gone. But I am looking at this through several different perspectives.

 

Firstly, there is rumours that a new female jewish producer was hired and that she has put in a serious complaint against him for anti-semitism. That is something that’s doing the rounds.

 

But I also think he was getting an awful lot of power. He was getting to the point where, as I said, he wasn’t the guy who could say everyone vote this way and the nation would have voted with Tucker, but he was getting to the point where he could choose who would be the Republican Party nominee for a presidential election.

 

So I think that’s a lot of power. And I think people will be getting nervous about the way he was wielding his power. I also think, now there’s a lot of people who don’t like him. And I want to start by saying there’s a lot of people who have said fundamentally Tucker is a bad guy. He’s counter-signalled White Identity Politics, which he did.

 

He said that he would never engage with anybody or vote for a group or help a group that said they were going to stand up for Whites or for the interests of Whites, which is obviously something that’s concerning. It’s obviously something that means he’s not on our side. It obviously means that he would be the kind of person that if America, because he doesn’t knowledge the demographic trends and that was one of the interesting things he said. He came round and said basically:

 

“America is going to become a country where Whites are no longer the majority.”

 

And he said when that happens and as we move towards that position, we will basically see more and more parties and more and more individuals in politics emerge who are going to say:

 

“Hey White man, we are here to listen to you, White man, we are here to represent you.”

 

And he said:

 

“If anyone comes to me and says that:

 

“I’m going to tell them to F off!”

 

And he did actually use the full F word, he didn’t say “F off”, he’s quite crude about it, quite forceful, so he’s obviously not on our level.

 

[31:24]

 

But he did say things that got people thinking. And I’m kind of wondering now whether he came out with all of this stuff recently because he knew he was going to get sacked and he was trying to stave it off or try to prove to Murdoch or whoever influences Murdoch that actually he’s not going down this White national street. But he said plenty of things that’s woken people up. And I’ve seen a lot of people saying:

 

“Look, this is a good thing, or who cares? Or Tucker’s not our friend, so it doesn’t matter that he sacked.”

 

I actually don’t think that, because I look at that slot and I don’t see him as an ally, but I do see him as somebody that got people thinking a little bit outside the mainstream. In the same way that Nigel Farage in the UK got people thinking a little bit outside the mainstream. The same that GB News in the UK gets people thinking a little bit outside the mainstream.

 

Now, these people don’t take people all the way to White ethno-nationalism or White in-group preference, but they might get them on that path. And my big worry is that every time they get rid of somebody like Tucker, who do they replace them with? Somebody worse. Out goes Tucker and in comes someone like Ben Shapiro out goes Tucker and in comes another Sean Hannity, out goes Tucker, and you get somebody who is just absolute mainstream Republican, absolute RINO [Republican in Name Only]. That’s what you’re going to end up with.

 

And that is something that doesn’t sit well with me, because in some circumstances it definitely is better the devil you know. And I think with somebody like Tucker, although he wasn’t our best friend, I certainly don’t think he was an out and out enemy of us.

 

And ultimately there were plenty of normal people who watched his show, enjoyed his show, and were undoubtedly, I believe, brought closer to our way of thinking through that. What’s your take on that?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, there’s one take which is that this could destroy Fox News. And Fox News being destroyed is overall strategically good because then people will have to get off the Fox News plantation and look to other forms of conservative media which are a little bit more hardline and just getting the Boomers basically to adapt to the new media environment which is more conducive to finding gateways to our type of talking points and so on. So that’s one way to look at it.

 

[34:00]

 

But it depends who he’s replaced with. If he’s replaced with someone who’s just terrible and no one cares about their show, then that would be the outcome. And I think it would be good because it would just move all the attention off Fox.

 

But if they replace him with someone who’s competent and capable of holding together most of his audience, like Ben Shapiro would be someone like that, then I think that would be bad. Obviously, I think Ben Shapiro would be worse to be tuning into five nights a week than Tucker Carlson. But I don’t know if that’s actually realistic because Shapiro has his own company, which is very successful. He would have to leave that behind. I don’t see that being his choice. So I don’t know. It really kind of depends who they replace him with for me.

 

But I think talking about Tucker, I think what Tucker was, was Trump got elected, then they put him into that slot, and his job was really taking that populist energy and narrating it into a way that ends up I think creating a new system compatible face for the Republican Party that kind of adapts to that kind of populist insurgency and recuperates that energy and restabilizes Republican discourse.

 

And that’s a very dangerous figure because you had this kind of sense with the Trump uprising in 2016 of a kind of civil war on the American right, between this between the old guard and this new kind of style, this new approach. And now, after all of these years, figures like Carlson and Trump, now they set the new normal for the party, which is largely adapted. And we have this kind of what the Republican Party in the United States stands for now, which doesn’t really emphasise the free market thing as much as it used to, and has a more kind of populist economic approach. And maybe less of a hawkish foreign policy approach, which you could say these are good things, but has made absolutely zero progress on identity issues. And has made absolutely zero progress, or has gone backwards even on, let’s say, like sexual and gender politics issues.

 

It’s gotten to the point now where we’re totally fine with gay marriage and we support gays against groomers. And the real problem is when people are doing transgender surgeries under the age of 18:

 

“When you turn 18, you want to chop your dick off. That’s your right as an American. But we can’t have 17 year olds doing that it’s too young!”

 

And so it wasn’t even like that if you go back prior to the Trump era. So to me, there’s just no real resistance on the things that really matter.

 

[37:03]

 

And all of the kind of development of populism is all in these safer areas like economic and foreign policy, which they’re important, but ultimately they’re only important if a future for White families is actually secured. So to me, I think Tucker is dangerous in that sense because he can kind of retain this semblance of a populist nationalist style without any of the substance. So for him to get struck down maybe is a good thing. I’m seeing with a lot of the other conservative influences that they are feeling the pressure from the more radical elements of the American right and making smaller concessions to White Identity and that they have more of a kind of backbone when it comes to the whole LGBT agenda and so on and so maybe it’s better for them to rise and for Tucker to fall. Tucker is in many ways a very progressive figure in those areas and always loved having his base black guys coming on the show to talk about how Martin Luther King was so great and that was what his vision was, and the Leftist portrayed his vision. That was his mantra.

 

So, yeah, to me, I think a lot of the Tucker felating is the wrong strategic move, but that’s my take.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, I can see where you’re coming from, and I can certainly see that fundamentally places like Fox News are not places for us. They’re places that are used more as gatekeepers than gateways. But I did see Tucker as slightly an exception to that rule.

 

I am interested to see where he goes from here, though, because the logical thing for Tucker to do is to set up Tucker Carlson News or Tuckertakes.com, where if he starts Tuckertakes.com, and I came up with that, I demand a cut! Where he just gives his hot takes every night and it’s basically like his own version of YouTube where he monetises it, and he becomes almost sort of a more mainstream and safer Alex Jones with his own little media empire. May he join the daily wire? Is there a chance that Shapiro or somebody would reach out to him and pull him in? Because he would be a huge name for an existing network. Where do you think he’s going to go next? And then we’ll move on to a bit of Doctor Who.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I don’t think that The Blaze could afford him. So Daily Wire is probably the only other conservative outlet that could actually afford him. They were willing to put over $50 million down for Stephen Crowder. I remember when all that kind of blew up at the end of last year, the so-called controversy around that.

 

[39:54]

 

So if they’re willing to put that kind of money down for Crowder, I can imagine they would have some really serious money they could put down to secure Tucker. And I saw Matt Walsh praising Tucker on Twitter recently as well. So that could be interesting if he goes there because Daily Wire would really, I think, overtake Fox and become like the number one conservative outlet in the US. If that was to happen. Definitely, because they have a massive presence on Facebook, the boomer Conservatives.

 

Yet the algorithm just pumps so many Shapiro and Candace Owens and Matt Walsh videos at them. And they’re very successful in their social media presence. They’re very dynamic just in general in how they approach the business, and they get all the support in the world that you could imagine on YouTube. So that could be interesting. He could either go there or he could start his own company and create his own version of Daily Wire or The Blaze, and then he could depends on how ambitious he is.

 

So I guess it’s probably one of those two outcomes that I foresee. If he created his own network. That could be interesting if he kind of brought a lot of his production staff over and maybe he would then platform some more radical voices and maybe that would be a good thing. Maybe, I don’t know, he could start platforming like people like Pedro Gonzalez or Scott Greer even at the most extreme, these kinds of people. Not that I endorse everything that they say, but they support our identity talking points in a more explicit way. So I could see maybe that type of thing happening potentially, but who knows?

 

But I think it’s one of those two outcomes.

 

Mark Collett: I think it’s certainly going to be interesting.

 

And one thing I don’t think is a coincidence. This is all happening now, before the 2024 presidential run. I think this is being done for a reason.

 

Anyway, let’s move on. Now, Joel, I spoke to you earlier and said we might talk a little bit about Doctor Who. You didn’t even know who Dr. Who was or is, which was something I was quite shocked about, but you are a little bit younger than me. Doctor Who is basically sort of a Sci-Fi character that nerds here in the UK absolutely love. He’s a travelling what’s known as a Time Lord and a Time Lord travels through time, sort of writing injustices and fighting against evil.

 

And over the last few years, Dr. Who has been, for the first time ever recast as a woman. But now we are seeing Doctor Who for the first time ever cast as a black man.

 

Now, that might not be something that’s particularly outrageous, but when you look at the first publicity shots that are being used to promote the new Doctor Who, you can see them on the screen now. And I’m pretty sure I think I might be able to. Yeah, I can. Let’s make that a little bit bigger so that nobody misses it. These are the publicity shots for the new series of Doctor Who. And the Doctor is this basically looks a bit like Shaft, doesn’t he? The Doctor Who meets Shaft. And here he is with his White blonde hair, blue eyed assistant that he’s draping his arm around, or she’s draping her arm around him.

 

[43:32]

 

And this makes me sort of think back to my childhood. Because when I watched Doctor Who as a child, Doctor Who was sort of this nerdy character. He had an assistant, he was a White man. I remember going to the video shop and renting all the old Doctor Who’s. I really liked them. And you see what it’s become. And I look at this and people might say, well, look, Mark, this is old news. They’re doing this time and time again with sort of every character, every franchise, every form of media. Now you’ve got the black Spider Man, black Captain America, black Female Iron Man, and here it is, just with another franchise. Why does this bother you?”

 

Well, I’m not going to get my knickers too much in a twist for this. But I think it is indicative of something, and that is that nothing is going to be left alone. No stone is going to be unturned, no franchise, no fandom, no nerd fuel out there is going to remain free of the liberal, progressive, anti-White agenda.

 

And I’ve got to say that I’ve seen a move from young White men, from being outgoing, young, sort of plucky guys who go out, have a drink, meet friends, meet women, to being very much home dwelling, screen watching, basically consumers of things they like.

 

And I think that’s because a lot of young White men today, they do feel fundamentally that they don’t actually have any form of outlet in the real world.

 

And I think that depresses them. I think that’s a depressing thing.

 

So I think you’ve got these young guys who look at the world and they’re not at home in the club, they’re not at home in the pub, they don’t want to go out and sit in the park. Everywhere they go, they see the world changing for the worst.

 

So what do they do? They cocoon themselves in their rooms, surrounded by the things they like. So more and more you’ve got these guys who they’re into comic books, so they go home, they get their comic books, they draw the curtains, they put on some music that they like and they read their comic books.

 

You’ve got guys who like movies, they go home, draw the curtains, order the takeaway, and they watch their movies. You’ve got guys like me who like gaming, we go home, we draw the curtains, grab the Red Bull and bang on the video games.

 

And it’s the same with people who like Warhammer, it’s the same with people who like TV series, Dungeons and Dragons, whatever it is.

 

Guys are more and more today withdrawing from the modern world, cocooning themselves with the things they love, and trying to sort of trap the horrors of the real world outside away from them. They’re cocooning themselves.

 

[46:52]

 

But I think what you’re seeing more and more is a concerted effort by the system to really get into whatever young guys like.

 

So if you like computer games, it’s in those. If you like comic books, sure as hell it’s in there. And even if you just like Doctor Who, even if you like the nerdiest of all nerd fuel, it’s there as well!

 

Do you get this feeling that now there’s nowhere to run, there’s nowhere to hide? Even if you’re in your own home cocooning yourself away from the madness and the anti-White agenda, there just isn’t any escaping it, no matter what you do?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, basically my favourite hobby is being racist on social media. So that’s what I can COO myself in, control the curtains and order takeaway for. [chuckling]

 

Mark Collett: But what’s your favourite takeaway?

 

Joel Davis: My favourite takeaway? It’s hard to say. I get bored of getting the same thing. I get in moods.

 

Mark Collett: If I was to put a gun to your head and say, now you can have one takeaway before I pull the trigger. What would it be, in Minecraft?

 

Joel Davis: Probably just like a good burger. Not from like a chain, but from one of those boutique burger places.

 

Mark Collett: You’re like the Australian Richard Spencer? [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: [chuckling] Not much of a fan of the mushrooms. The caramelised onions sound pretty good, but I’m not a huge fan of the mushrooms. Or the Swiss cheese seems a little bit off.

 

Mark Collett: You ever been to Five Guys?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think Five Guys is overrated.

 

Mark Collett: Get this guy off the show! [chuckling] Five guys is amazing. Well, go back to answering the question. You sit there on the Internet cocooned with your edgy comments, with your boutique burger on your knee.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, when it comes to the whole anti-White agenda, I mean, I have heard of Doctor Who. I was aware that there was a show called Doctor Who. It just seemed kind of lame, so I’ve never watched it. But yeah, all the ZOG schlop on Netflix and so on is just egregious. I don’t watch any of it. My television isn’t plugged in. I don’t watch any of these streaming platforms.

 

Sometimes I’ll load a movie or something or like an old TV show. Like, I’ve been kind of like watching The Sopranos again recently. But I don’t really like 99.9% of what’s possible to consume, so I just don’t watch all that much. I don’t game that much because I just haven’t been bothered to game because of so much commitment to other things. And I hate not being good at something. So in order to play a specific video game, I’d have to suck at first and I just can’t handle losing, so I just avoid the whole thing.

 

[50:07]

 

But, yeah, the whole capacity to consume media just isn’t there anymore like it used to be. When I was growing up, there was a lot of seemingly great movies coming out all the time. The culture was dynamic and interesting with music and otherwise. And yeah, obviously it’s kind of like a black hole now. There’s just nothing creative being done and obviously it’s this social agenda just being rammed down your throat constantly in addition to that.

 

So there is really no escape. I think that’s good because then maybe young White guys will, like me, have to get their kicks from being racist on social media. And that’s really the revolutionary subculture. That’s where all the funny memes are. That’s where the dynamism, the youthful rebellion, the kind of creative critique of the system and so on, that’s where it is. It’s the dissident Right online.

 

So the degradation of mainstream culture, I think, only strengthens the allure of our dissident subculture. So long may continue. I want them to turn everyone into race. Like every single show should be race mixing and feminist and just infinite trannies! Just make it as terrible as possible so that people can’t better watch it anymore, I say.

 

Mark Collett: That’s a really interesting point. And that does lead on to an interesting conversation. Do we need everything to burn in order for people to actually seek a new refuge? Does everything have to be torn to the ground? Do they have to defile everything we’ve loved, everything we’ve known, to actually wake people up?

 

Because I’ll say this and without being negative and without sort of being a Debbie Downer, we all want to see nationalism succeed. We all want to see more people turn to our cause.

 

But you look at the situation we’re facing in terms of record numbers of migrants, increasing anti-free speech laws, increasing numbers of social policies that Rob us of basic freedoms. Like here in the UK, you’ve got these 15 minute cities or the ultra low emission zones that basically ban you from driving a car. They’re moving towards electric only cars by 2030. I never thought we’d see the day where the petrol car would basically be outlawed, but we’re headed there.

 

Does everything have to be taken away? Because we’re seeing more and more taken away every day. And there’s always this thing from nationalists that the more that gets taken away, the more likely people are to snap and to pursue a revolutionary agenda, or a revolutionary solution to their problems.

 

But I look at what we’re facing, Joel, and it’s not as if the public are beating down our doors. So say France. France is one of the few places where things have gone very well for nationalists, the ballot box. But even there, they can’t really break through and make the wins necessary. Do you think that by taking away more stuff and forcing this poison on people, it won’t actually have the desired effect? It’ll just leave more people depressed, despairing and broken?

 

[54:00]

 

And in fact, the effect of this isn’t necessarily to force people to look for a solution, but it actually just breaks people’s will and leaves them utterly crushed. And they feel that there’s no reason to fight.

 

As I say, I’m not saying that’s how I feel, but I do think you get to a point where you take so much from someone that maybe you take enough for them to feel that there’s nothing worth fighting for. When does the depression and the feeling of being crushed get so overwhelming that you just think:

 

“I’m going to lie back and die rather than fighting?”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, undoubtedly that’s a dynamic, and obviously that’s part of it, that’s part of the motivation. They want to brainwash you or demoralize you with all of this. But it’s at the cost of the actual entertainment quality of the product.

 

So I think the propaganda of the enemy, if it was good, if it was actually good quality, it would be so much more threatening to me. But because it’s so bad quality, and because it’s kind of like they’ve created this Frankenstein monster of a purity spiral within their circle that’s just kind of consuming itself and just destroying the quality of the product. I get a certain sense that this is a good thing because we saw recently that Super Mario movie came out. I haven’t seen it, but I didn’t have any kind of younger member of my family to go and watch the movie with. Otherwise I would have. It felt a little cringe going as an adult, the Super Mario movie. So I didn’t.

 

But it got really good reviews, basically because and smashed box office records because it wasn’t pozzed. This is the Japanese company, obviously Nintendo, and they weren’t interested in pushing this wack social agenda. And so as a result of this, they just made a normal movie like what would have come out in the 2000s and everyone loved it.

 

And so it’s very easy, I guess, for a movie, …

 

Mark Collett: Just to cut in there mate. To date it has made $888,000,000. It looks like it’s on track to break a billion! And you are correct that the Hollywood script writers for the Super Mario Brothers movie apparently had a whole raft of changes and tweaks to Mario’s character and to the Princess and other characters that were going to be pushing social agendas. And Nintendo came in and said:

 

“That’s not what we’re having. This is a Mario film for the family.”

 

That you could have shown to 80s kids. And they’d love it. That’s how that came about.

 

But you’re right. It is absolutely smashing it! Whereas all the modern pozzed Marvel films are flopping.

 

[57:15]

 

Joel Davis: And so it makes an environment where if we create good culture and that carries with it as any good piece, particularly when it comes to a film, would have to carry with it something which was amenable to our worldview and in conflict with the current social agenda that’s being kind of imposed upon us. That it’s going to stand out and be so much more effective. So that creates a cultural opportunity for a kind of dissident vanguard to really grip the new generation and provide them with the only edifying alternative.

 

So obviously, we have to rise to that challenge and figure out how to kind of respond to that as a broad subculture to go from being a mere subculture to a fully fledged counterculture. But that opportunity, I think, is there to engage in cultural struggle. I don’t like accelerationist takes when it comes to politics because this whole idea of like:

 

“Well, if the political system gets worse, that’ll be better for us.”

 

Somehow I think that’s wrong. I think it just makes things worse.

 

But I think in the cultural sphere, it does create, I think, a capacity to fill a niche. Because when young people are in that phase of life, whether moving from your late teens to your early 20s, you’re looking to kind of differentiate yourself from the dominant culture, that’s just the culture of your parents, the culture of your upbringing, because you’re trying to assert your own individuality. And this is kind of natural for that phase of life.

 

And so these kids, there’s a significant portion of them that are rebelling against the social agenda that we are against and are looking for that kind of capacity to individuate themselves. And if we can provide that, we already have to a large significant portion of Zoomer nationalists that are now emerging. And radical TikToks with Funk Edits or whatever, getting millions of views and so on as a result. And it’s kind of maybe weird and strange to older people, the kind of forms that it’s taking. But nevertheless, it is there. It is a presence in the culture that when I was in my late teens, there wasn’t this dissident far-Right subculture that was directly available to me like it is now to the coming generation.

 

And I think that’s a positive thing.

 

And if you look at a country like Poland, where the Internet isn’t censored like it is in the English speaking world, the Zoomers there are either going like full far-Left or they’re becoming our guys. Like the Confedarachi [sp] Party in Poland, which has got open anti-semites in the party, dominated by ethno-nationalists, hardcore TradCath, social values and so on, they poll at over 40% with people under the age of 29 in Poland, even though they only poll with like less than 5% of the Boomers. That is the future of Polish politics is us versus them without anything in between.

 

[1:00:37]

 

And I think if our Internet wasn’t censored like it was after the initial wave of the alt-Right, we’d be kind of a lot closer to that in the Anglo-sphere. Back in Australia, back in 2016, 2017, Blair Cottrell videos were getting millions of views on Facebook. Imagine if that had continued until now, like how Australian politics would be in comparison to what happened?

 

And so obviously that’s a huge challenge that we have to face and circumnavigate. But I do think if we can figure out a way around censorship, the counterculture expressing our views is inevitable. We are the only real answer, only real alternative to what’s being presented. And I think that authenticity, like great art, is driven by authenticity.

 

And I think therefore, because we are really the only stance socially, morally and so on, that has any authenticity left, that would then express itself in the arts, organically. And I hope that we see that increasingly in the coming decade.

 

Mark Collett: One thing I will say about this takeover of the media. I’ll say this quickly because we’ve got to do Superchats in a second. We’re still an hour left. There’s plenty of time to Superchat. Get your questions in, please. And please do consider making a donation, even if it’s only a small one. Please consider doing that.

 

I will say this, what we’ve seen with this media, especially with when you said the pushing of the trannies, one thing that does disturb me about this is you’re seeing a rise in these popular YouTubers who aim their content at children, in them pushing transgender stuff upon kids.

 

I don’t know if you’ve seen, but there’s been a lot of controversy lately with a YouTuber called Mr. Beast who makes sort of unboxing videos and basically videos that appeal to children. And he is now performing alongside a transgender male to female.

 

And I look at all of this and I do see what you’re saying, that if every piece of media is defiled, ultimately, where do people have left to go? But for a lot of people, and this is my final question before we go to the Superchat. For a lot of people who are coming up, who are young, they will just be so immersed in this. Surely their immersion in this will lead to them just not knowing the difference. And if they don’t know the difference, won’t they just feel all that’s just the norm, and will just be these strange outliers that are pushing back against what essentially is the structure of society?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, obviously that’s the case. But dialectically, I think that this is a polarizing thing. What’s being pushed is so insane and so egregious that I think it really kind of forces a critique. It implies a critique of itself. That’s kind of how that’s kind of how the human mind works. The human mind works by thinking in oppositions.

 

[1:04:00]

 

And you see this with the Left itself, like the Left where the Left opposes the centre right. It projects this idea that they’re all Nazis. Trump’s a Nazi. Tucker Carlson is a Nazi. The entire Republican Party apparently are these White nationalists, White supremacists, if only, right? But this is what they say because that’s the obvious enemy that’s kind of Illuminating and defining their worldview in opposition to it.

 

And so the kind of extremeness of the Left kind of brings us naturally into a conversation with it. Like their existence implies our existence. And if we don’t exist, their whole worldview can’t really exist because it’s kind of built upon it’s opposition to the old world, which was ruled by our ideas.

 

As I said, I’m not an accelerationist politically. I think things are just going to keep getting worse and that’s bad. But from a cultural standpoint, I do think that the necessity of an extreme right or using the word extreme is people don’t like that. A radical Right, a far-Right, whatever you want to use it is kind of implied if you want to oppose this.

 

And I think that message will only kind of strengthen in its validity and in its intensity. Like in the 90s the impression that I had was that with the whole prosperity, the stability, if you’re trying to push a radical Right-wing message in the context of the 90s, the 2000s, it’s going to be very difficult because there’s a sense that people have a lot to lose. And there’s a sense that maybe if we can just get Conservatives in, maybe we can stabilize things. Or even more so, who cares about politics? Politics doesn’t really affect me. I’m focused on my personal life.

 

But now that everything has become so politicised, there’s no escape from politics. And now that everything has become so extreme, you either have to go along with it or you have to radically oppose it. There’s not really any middle ground that’s feasible that makes any sense.

 

So I think in this environment, it’s just kind of very culturally amenable to radicalism from both sides, but our side as well. And I think a lot of these younger kids who become alienated, particularly young boys who become alienated by how every girl is, is a slut now and is encouraged to be so through the kind of pornographication, for lack of a better term of young people’s experience online, and people who grow up as a minority in their own high school and who face racial discrimination as Whites in a very kind of direct and personal way.

 

And people who grew up with atheist parents surrounded by people who don’t believe in God and this kind of default atheism who seek to question that and explore religion and so on. I think it’s created, as I said, this subcultural energy that draws people to ideas that are on our side. If not this, what would the alternative be? It must be them. I have to explore that to differentiate myself from conformity.

 

[1:07:54]

 

As I said, it would have to take the form of a countercultural force. Most people are attracted to conformity. Most people will go along with the dominant culture. Things are going to keep getting worse.

 

But I think if the Left were capable of still making as good music and as good movies as they were 20 years ago, it would be a lot harder to defeat them.

 

Mark Collett: That’s a very good take. And look, I’m only human, and I sort of do sort of swish between different thought processes. At one time I look at things and I think:

 

“Oh, my gosh, I do desperately want to preserve what little we’ve got. I want to preserve what we’ve got and remember the good times. I don’t want He-Man and transformers and all the things that I held dear to be destroyed.”

 

I tell you, the other night I sat with my daughter, and usually we read books before bed, but occasionally she gets a bit whingy. And I’ve been showing her the 1980s He-Man, and she was like:

 

“Daddy, please, can we watch He-Man?”

 

I was like:

 

“All right, the book’s not going down well. You’re bouncing about it too much.”

 

And she sat and she watched a He-Man, and she likes it, and she likes the female characters, especially.

 

And sometimes I do feel a genuine sadness that all of those things we held dear that were innocent and masculine and positive and yeah, they were trying to sell toys, but it wasn’t evil, it wasn’t bad, it wasn’t twisted, it wasn’t nefarious. And I feel a genuine sadness that those things are being taken away from us, and it makes me want to grasp on and trying to preserve what’s there.

 

But sometimes I just completely snap and think:

 

“They’re defiling everything, let them burn it all to the ground and let’s rebuild it again.”

 

And I am only human and I do flip between those two emotions, depending how I feel. So I wasn’t trying to say these things to sort of entrap you in any way or get you to say something, because I do flip between the two.

 

Sometimes I want to hold on and preserve what little we have left, and other times I think:

 

“Well, knock it all to the ground. It’s time to rebuild.”

 

When there’s nothing left and people are out in the cold, that’s when we’ll have to huddle together as a race, and that’s when it will go back to survival of the fittest. And I see that with the media as well.

 

So I think there’s validity to both arguments. And depending on the day of the week and my mood, I sometimes feel different ways about it.

 

[1:10:22]

 

Anyway, here are the Superchats. Some Random Bloke gave $3 thank you so much! Said:

 

“The best of Tucker Carlson is when he read out the ADL’s response to a one state solution that sounded like a well written piece from a White nationalist and they removed it from their website after.”

 

Yeah, Tucker’s done some good things. You can’t deny that, can you, Joel? He has done some good things.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I did mention that when I spoke about him before that one segment. Obviously that was the best thing that Tucker ever did.

 

But again, I chalked that one up to his writing staff, who I think are more based than he is. I don’t think he would ever generate that out of his own volition independently.

 

Didn’t you want to talk about the Diane Abbott thing or are we just skipping that?

 

Mark Collett: I’m going to skip that. I’m making a whole video on that that I’ve been working on today. And we’re into the second hour now. If anyone asks a question, we can talk about it. But I am sort of one and a half thousand words deep into a script that I’m recording tomorrow.

 

So I don’t want to waste my, I don’t want to say what I’m going to say on the video tonight and then it all be ruined and they’ll watch my video on Friday.

 

Joel Davis: Fair enough to me. I didn’t really look into it that much, but it was a pretty basic thing. Like my 30 second take would just be that she didn’t really actually say anything that I saw that seemed like it was that anti-semitic. She was just saying:

 

“Oh, jews haven’t suffered like black people have.”

 

And then jews got upset. [chuckling]

 

So it’s kind of funny, but it’s just so crazy. That’s how sensitive that they are, that no one can suffer more than them!

 

Mark Collett: What you’re trying to say, Joel, in a nutshell, is there’s a group of people so incredibly powerful that you pass the most mild opinion on them, saying that maybe they haven’t suffered as much as another group and that’s enough for somebody’s entire life to be ruined, which ably demonstrates their power level!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, for sure. And this whole discourse like the Labour Party under [Jeremy] Corbyn was anti-semitic. No, it wasn’t. I mean, it would be cool if it was, but no, it was anti-Israel.

 

Mark Collett: It’d be cool if it was, [chuckling] but it certainly wasn’t. Well, wait for my hot take on Friday. Serena JB, our lovely friend, gave £5 thank you so much! And said:

 

“Joel is a great guest and a credit to Australia. How did he get into dissident politics? Was there anything in particular that red pilled him? Joel and Blair’s show is a great watch, too.”

 

What red pilled you, big guy?

 

[1:12:53]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, thanks, Serena, for the question. I’ve seen her on Twitter going hard, and it’s like, if Serena this nice old lady, she does more for the White race on Twitter than most of you lazy bastards out there watching this show. Like, if she can do it, what excuse do you have? She’s out there ratioing people, shilling White Identity hard, doesn’t cuck on anything. It’s like, basically a nice old grandma lady is, like, contributing more, as I said, than 99% of the movement.

 

So that’s [chuckling] good on her, but it’s damning for a lot of you that should be stepping up and doing better.

 

But as for what red pilled me? I got red pilled by the initial wave of the Alt-Right 2014, 2015 online. At the time, I was about 19, 20 years old, and I went through a little bit of, like, a libertarian phase of sorts, and that led me down a pipeline because I found myself in arguments with people about gun rights.

 

And one of the big gotchas in that argument would be talking about how in the United States, the different gun laws in the different states have no correlation to the different gun crime rates. But there’s a perfect correlation between basically how many black people is in a specific state and how much gun crime occurs.

 

And so that was like an initial kind of race realism pill that I needed to win libertarian arguments. And at that time, there was a lot of this libertarian to Alt-Right pipeline thing going on.

 

Arguments like, well, if you want to live in a free, classical liberal society, you need a bunch of Anglo Saxons who will vote for that to live in your society. Otherwise, you bring in brown people and they’ll vote for communism and so on. These kinds of arguments that started, like, drawing me into our persuasion and then exposed me to all the other arguments and ideas, and that kind of completed my conversion.

 

And what drew me into participation was I had a roommate whose YouTube was called True Deal Tom. His name was Dylan Thomas. He was a YouTuber, like a kind of dissident, right? YouTuber. We kind of became personal friends and we started hanging out and I started talking about my hot takes on this and that and so on. And he found that inspirational, I guess, in a certain sense, for some of his content. Like, he started reading books I was suggesting and so on.

 

And he suggested that we start doing podcasts together. We started podcasting on his channel. That was the first kind of content that I ever made. And then not long after that, he decided to kind of quit the whole scene and delete his channel and so on. But that kind of gave me the, … I got bit with the podcasting bug, if you will, the content creation bug.

 

And so that kind of drew me into kind of doing it. So then I made my own YouTube channel and engaging a lot more with social media and the scene and so on, and that kind of led me to here.

 

Mark Collett: And here you are, my friend. Anglo and Behold gave £10 thank you so much! And said:

 

“Juice Waffen, standing back and standing by.”

 

Thank you so much, Aunt Sally gave £3. Thank you so much, Aunt Sally, and said:

 

“Thank you, Mark. Joel is another great guest.”

 

Thank you, my dear.

 

Paul of the Marsh gave $25. Thank you for your generosity and said:

 

“Thank you both for your relentless hard work for our cause.”

 

Thank you, my friend. Redline gave $5. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“The sacking of Tucker came very abruptly. Why do you think that is?”

 

Well, I think we’ve discussed that to death, my friend. But I think it was basically due to the upcoming elections, and I think there’s going to be a lot of changes at Fox News and I think the mainstream media are going to clean house, as is social media, long before that presidential election.

 

And I just want to ask you this, Joe. You said you’re back on Twitter. A lot of people are. I was back on Twitter and back off again. But don’t you think it’s worrying that we’re actually starting to see an acceleration again of people being kicked off?

 

There’s been a whole slew of pretty big and a lot smaller as well. Content creators kicked off off Twitter over the past few weeks, including Kevin MacDonald and Andrew Anglin. And people like myself, Nick Fuentes we’re off again. And National Justice Party. The Nordic Resistance, Patriotic Alternative. There are a huge amount of people who either weren’t allowed back on or who were allowed on, but then were promptly kicked off. Do you think Twitter is going back to the way it was?

 

Joel Davis: Well, what I’ve noticed ever since Musk took over at Twitter is that there’s not much logic to who gets banned and who’s allowed on the platform. It seems as though there are different elements in the moderation staff that have different biases, different views, and they’re not all compatible. There doesn’t seem to be a uniform company policy.

 

However, there does seem to be one uniform company policy, which is that if you are institutionally, directly affiliated with a relatively large and well known nationalist organisation, then they kick you off and make you stay off. Which is obviously what happened to you guys. What happened to the National Justice Party. And so on.

 

Fuentes got his account back very briefly and was kicked back off again. I think with him personally, he’s just so high profile that they just copped so much heat for bringing him back that they just refused to withstand it, basically.

 

[1:19:04]

 

So I think that explains the situation with him. With Anglin and MacDonald, particularly with MacDonald I think he should appeal the ban. He might get lucky and get brought back on a lot of people have got banned and then were able to respawn, I think, because or they were reinstated, and I think it’s because their accounts were just kind of inundated with reports. Maybe team of Antifa just kind of mass reported their accounts and the sheer quantity of reports triggered the trigger being pulled, if you will, and perhaps on review, they might get lucky if it was just over, like maybe they had a loose tweet that was mass reported or something. So we’ll see what happens with those two.

 

But I think overall, Twitter is much more lax in its moderation. I think you can get away with saying a lot more than you used to be able to. A lot of people have been reinstated, like myself and others who have been banned for many years.

 

So overall, I think the situation is better and I don’t really perceive anything to have changed that much. I think we’ll continue to see this where people get banned and reinstated and it’s kind of haphazard.

 

But I’m pretty happy with the fact that I’m able to go into Twitter and I’m able to kind of spread a pretty uncucked message and get away with it for now, with the blue tick and everything.

 

So I don’t want to criticise Twitter too much because they’re giving me that opportunity. But obviously I disagree with removing any of our guys from the platform.

 

But, yeah, I think ultimately I’m still kind of I think I’m like 70% positive about the Musk regime. I think it’s overall a net positive. And yeah, I think if you’re not institutionally, directly affiliated with a nationalist organisation, and that’s probably due to government element, government pressure or some organised NGO pressure, that people like yourself are kind of kicked off.

 

I think you should definitely keep trying to make new accounts, appeal your bands constantly. You might eventually luck out and get back on, because there are elements within the Twitter moderation team that are reinstating our guys. So we must have friendly elements in the organisation. Maybe they’re like free speech absolutist types or maybe they’re actually, politically, sympathetic.

 

But, yeah, it’s worth, I think, doing your 100% utmost to maintain as much of a presence on the platform as possible because the reach is so important. And we’re having a lot of success, I think, in spreading our ideas and our influence to more centre Right, sympathetic, conservative types.

 

And it seems like there’s kind of still this radicalisation engine which is operating, dragging a lot of those people to the Right. And I’ve seen, like, Marga Boomers posting about Israel and the jewish question and so on in ways that I never would have seen online three or four years ago.

 

So, yeah, I think it’s become a very productive platform, I think, for our cause.

 

[1:22:28]

 

Mark Collett: Okay. Slightly different take to mine. I think it’s turning back into the same dump it was before! Tony G gave $3. Thank you so much!:

 

“Good day, Mark and Joel. Has Joel watched Priscilla, Queen of the Desert? Has he seen Chopper and Bad Boy Bobby? I bet I can guess. The only movie pushed was Queen was Queer of the Desert.”

 

Have you seen those films?

 

Joel Davis: Only the Chopper film. I never watched the Priscilla one. My impression of it was that it had a transvestite in it. So I never watched it for that reason.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, I’ve never watched Priscilla Queer. I haven’t seen any of those films. But apparently that Bad Boy Bubby, when you actually read sort of what the film’s about, it sounds like one of the most degenerate things I’ve ever heard of in my life! So I’m not even sure I could watch that.

 

Max Anderson gave £5. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“It is the darkest before the dawn and we are seeing more people getting red pilled. Could this result in us waking up one morning and the system crashing? Or will we see the system fall by the death of a thousand cuts?”

 

I don’t want to be negative. I don’t want to be negative. But I have always said I don’t believe in the idea of a great collapse, or a race war or some great cataclysmic conflict. I do believe it will be a death of 1000 cuts. I think it will be slow, it will be painful and people will be waiting for this big sort of calamitous ending which won’t come. And I’ve said that about the death of our race. I said it in my book. I said:

 

“Britain’s end won’t come about in some glorious final battle like at the end of a Lord of a Rings film.”

 

It’ll come about slowly. It’ll come about house by house, door by door, street by street, town by town, city by city, where slowly everything changes. Like a dark shroud falling over Britain. It won’t happen with the hordes of Sauron coming out of the gate and some glorious leader on horseback saying to his men:

 

“This is the final charge.”

 

And at the end one remains standing and the other falls. I don’t think it will happen like that.

 

And I think that is the sad reality of what we’re seeing. I think that’s a sad reality of demographic change, that it doesn’t result in the kind of conditions that lead to this giant one off collapse which happens boom overnight. It is something that is gradual and eats away at a nation. And I think that’s why it’s so much harder to combat than something that’s immediate and calamitous.

 

What’s your take on that, Joel?

 

[1:25:19]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I agree with what you said and I think it’s a long road to fixing this. And, yeah, I’m not particularly optimistic about the short to medium term politically whatsoever, but I am optimistic about growing the sympathy for our cause in the general population and progressively building a cadre and building more sophisticated organisations and institutions and cultural expression and so on.

 

And that White Identity Politics will continue to make progress, and particularly as Whites, God forbid, become minorities in more and more countries, White Identity Politics only becomes more necessary. People say have this view that like:

 

“Oh, we have to win while we still control the demographics, otherwise it’s over and we’re going to have to become civ-nationalists to win elections.”

 

Or something. To me, this is the entirely wrong attitude.

 

I mean, the identity politics of all these minority groups is working quite well for them. So identity politics only becomes more necessary when you become a minority. And jews are a very small percentage of our populations and they have incredible power and success.

 

Black identity politics is very successful even though they’re quite small minorities in all of our countries and so on. And I know that their situation is different than ours. Ours will have to take on a completely different form. But the point is that minority racial power could still be a very effective political force. And it’s an existential requirement that we form White Identity Politics one way or another at some point. So I see it as inevitable. And it’s just about accelerating it’s mainstreaming, accelerating the pathway to racial consciousness in our people so that we get there with as much people and resources relatively and absolutely speaking as possible. That’s really the mission that I see.

 

Mark Collett: I will say one thing that I have found more and more interesting is looking towards the South African example of Orania, the breakaway Dutch Afrikan state, which is growing rapidly, has a good birth rate and is completely White and it’s like a mini ethno-state. And I find it very interesting that they have all the success that they have. They have clean running water, they have hospitals, they have electricity. They’ve managed to achieve all of that in Orania. And the rest of South Africa is collapsing.

 

And I do wonder whether in parts of Western Europe or definitely in America, you will sooner or later see, rather than this calamitous battle, or rather than Whites taking the power back via electoral means or mass protest or however they could take power back, you see increasing numbers decide to form breakaway communities which will have differing degrees of success.

 

And I think that’s an interesting path to discuss.

 

Red Line gave $10. Thank you so much!:

 

“Great show. I agree with Joel. Politics is everywhere, so everything will polarise.”

 

That is very true. VM gave $3. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Really enjoying the show. Really enjoying Joel and Blair, one stop shop for Aussie politics. What are Joel’s thoughts on Friendly Jordies?”

 

[1:29:07]

 

Joel Davis: Friendly Jordies is this kind of centre Left Australian YouTuber who basically is a shill for the Australian Labour Party, but has this kind of simulated parochialism where he kind of presents himself as this typical Aussie bloke talking about how great the Labour Party is. And there was a time when the Labour Party was saying that increasing immigration would actually be bad for the Australian worker when it was in the lead up to the last election. Because during Covid immigration basically stopped because we closed the borders for two years.

 

And so there was a debate last year about how much immigration we should bring back, and Labour ran on bringing it back at far lower levels than it was prior to the pandemic.

 

And since getting elected mid last year, they’ve doubled it and then some from what it was prior to the last pandemic to historic highs in Australian history, obliterating all records for immigration.

 

And this is producing a housing crisis, this is depressing wages, it’s creating all these terrible economic consequences without even mentioning, obviously, the kind of racial and cultural consequences.

 

And somehow all of those arguments that he was previously making in support of that labour campaign about why you should vote for Labour because they care about the workers. Unlike Liberals, they don’t want to flood the country with migrants to press wages just to benefit big business because they’re a party for the working class. He’s just forgotten all of that and just hasn’t mentioned it since. And is trying to explain the housing crisis not by the basic logic of supply and demand. You only have a certain amount of houses, you bring in more people, they have to live somewhere. Therefore the cost of housing goes up and there’s a shortage because there’s a shortage of supply.

 

That basic logic seems to he just can’t perceive it anymore, even though I know that he understands the basic logic because he has to perform this Labour Party shill role.

 

So I find him to be particularly annoying and just a cringe person in general. I think his wife is this Asian woman. And he had like, this one podcast where he was talking about how his favourite politician in Australian history is Jack Lang. And Jack Lang was the premier of New South Wales in the late 1920s, early 1930s, and he was incredibly based. Jack Lang said, and I quote:

 

“The White Australia policy is Australia’s Magna Carta.”

 

Jack Lang was compared to, he’s kind of like a populist nationalist leader compared to the fascist political style by some. And the Sydney Harbour Bridge was built by Jack Lang because the State of New South Wales owed jewish bankers from the City of London all of this money during the height of the Great Depression. And Jack Lang said:

 

“I refuse to pay you these debts because we’re undergoing a depression. The people of New South Wales can’t confer debts owed to these random banking oligarchs that we don’t care about.”

 

Got into this political dispute, which he resolved by going to the State Treasury himself, withdrawing all the money owed in cash and then spending it to build the Sydney Harbour Bridge.

 

[1:32:36]

 

So actually, the Sydney Harbour Bridge, in a way, is a giant fuck you to Shylock! [chuckling].

 

But anyway, Friendly Jordies talks about how much he loves Jack Lang, but there’s absolutely nothing about his politics which resembles Jack Lang in any meaningful sense, unfortunately.

 

So I really detest the guy. Hopefully one day I can debate him or something and embarrass him. That would be really enjoyable. But I assume that he would want to avoid that interaction.

 

So I don’t think it will ever happen, unfortunately. But maybe when I get a little bit more prominence, I will challenge him and see if I can force that scenario.

 

Mark Collett: Okay. D Salon Seven long term time donator. Thank you so much! He gave $10. He said after Tucker’s recent anti-White outburst, I’m all out of sympathy for him, but he was never actually pro-White. He merely pretended to be in order to drive viewership. He had a good few ideas over the years, but not worth defending. I think that’s generally the consensus from the wider community.”

Olivia gave $14. Thank you so much, my dear. And she said:

 

“Thank you, Mark and Joel. New authentication system on entropy, that is beyond me.”

 

Well, thank you for coming over here. And, yeah, I thought we’d have some problems with the entropy donations tonight because I had problems just logging in myself. So great news there. Thanks. Entropy! Dissonant Thoughts gave $5. Thank you very much. Mark Collett, great guest tonight. Would be great if you could get Southern Dingo on sometime.”

 

Well, he’s a bit hot to handle this old dingo, but I would consider it. Scaredy Cat gave $3. Thank you so much! He said:

 

“Hi, Mark. Bangladesh, Muslim country of 150,000,000 people in the subcontinent, just announced paying Russia in Chinese yen for four nuclear power plants. So guessing more Bangladeshis will go to Asian country China for university studies and professions, since Bangladesh government will want foreign currency, reducing UK border pressure.”

 

Well, that is very interesting, and it’s also very interesting to see how the rest of the world now are doing these deals and are basically working with each other without the interference of America.

 

I read a great article the other day on a site called Unherd about the future bankruptcy of America and how America has positioned itself in such a position and bullied people for so long that now fewer and fewer countries are in a position where they can or will be bullied because they’re all just working with each other and ignoring America.

 

Do you think that that is going to be something that will lead to change? Because for me, and I’ve said this before, I don’t think we can ever see lasting, serious political change the world over with America still as top dog on a global scale. What do you think, Joel? Would that be one of the things that, if America was deposed as the leading world superpower, could that be something that triggers the kind of changes that we wish to see in our lifetimes? Because often there’s a domino effect.

 

[1:35:41]

 

Joel Davis: Well, number one, I don’t agree with the assessment that America’s collapse is inevitable. I think what’s happening is a return to a Cold War type arrangement where the kind of Eurasian land mass, with the exception of Europe itself, is unified into a kind of China centric geopolitical bloc. And the US will continue to dominate the rest of the world with the exception maybe of Africa. And there’d be maybe some disputes in Latin America, but this would be roughly approximating the geopolitical arrangement of the Cold War. Only America has more of Europe this time in its orbit.

 

The island nations of Asia seem to be broadly aligned with the US, over China. And yeah, India has the strategic incentive to be aligned with the US over China. And a lot of these other states will have the incentive to kind of play both sides off each other.

 

I don’t think this is something that it will completely destroy American power. America has so many strong fundamentals. It’s in an incredible position still economically, with comparison to the rest of the world. It has incredible natural resources, incredible agricultural land, a lot of legacy prestige, and there isn’t really another candidate in the Western world that can come close to rivaling it’s state capacity.

 

So as a result of all of this, I see maybe America accepting more autonomy from the likes of the French, the Japanese and so on, where they become kind of more comparatively powerful in the alliance and therefore worthy of more respect within the Western kind of bloc as such, where it becomes more kind of Democratised, more of a kind of negotiation between the leading powers. But I don’t see it collapsing.

 

I think a lot of these calls are kind of cope from people who oppose American geopolitical power, who kind of see what they want to see and ignore what suits them to ignore.

 

But as for would America’s decline be good for the world and our goals? I think there’s another problem with this narrative, which is that there are native elites in all Western countries who are very organically loyal in themselves to this kind of globalist neoliberal project across all of Europe and in Australia and so on. And declining American power, I don’t think is a magic bullet to solving this whatsoever.

 

I think if America was to like, if our guys, for argument’s sake, were to somehow gain political power in the United States, I do think that would have positive effects, because then we would get support for changing the political status quo in our countries from our allies in the United States.

 

[1:39:04]

 

But yeah, I think otherwise it’s very difficult. The difficulties of building domestic opposition to the kind of status quo would remain identical to what they are now, even with a declining American presence. It isn’t as though the Americans are directly in control of Australian domestic politics, or directly in control of French domestic politics or British domestic politics. I think people have this kind of narrative that they are, which I think it’s just a misunderstanding of how the domestic political kind of approach is in all of these different countries.

 

It is true that there are kind of international networks of jewish interest, groups of international kind of financier elites and so on, that coordinate across the countries of the West to support kind of joint initiatives and build consensus. But a lot of the time, I think it’s more that the domestic kind of liberal cosmopolitan elites in Europe and Australia, they try to out Left-wing the United States to kind of prove how committed they are to the liberal international order and gain prestige in these international forums which they all enthusiastically participate in.

 

So if you had a decline in America, I think the EU would remain just as pozzed, and whatever kind of form the Western bloc would take, everyone would still be trying to out libtard each other.

 

So, yeah, I think there’s too much scapegoating, I think, to a certain extent of the Americans. I think maybe if you’re in Germany, Italy, I could understand that sensibility a bit more because they were literally occupied by the United States at one point, and kind of had this kind of politics foisted on them by that process.

 

But yeah, I think, as I said, I think people undersell how much domestic support there is for these policies, and therefore how everyone basically has the same responsibility to kind of build resistance to the anti-White agenda across the West and just kind of wishing death to America is not really a solution.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I slightly disagree with that. [chuckling] I think that America is sort of the fountain of basically the anti-White agenda. And I believe that the more power America has accrued and the more control it’s had over the world, the more anti-Whiteism we’ve seen. And I think until America’s grasp is broken, and until America is put into a position where it has to concentrate on its own failings rather than pushing anti-Whiteism. I think we’ve got a big problem.

 

And if there was a realigning of global power, I do think that could lead to an interesting situation. And I personally think that America, post the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of communism, has shifted in its policy. And it’s shifted in its policy because it has no genuine counterbalance. When it had a counterbalance, it couldn’t put as much energy into the anti-Whiteism without a counterbalance it has done that.

 

Act One, Two, Three said:

 

“Do we have a directory of our artists?”

 

We do. We have the Patriotic Arts Community and the White Art Collective. Stan Juan said:

 

“Joel, spot on. There is a growing undercurrent and dissident counterculture amongst many youngsters driven by alt media circles. I’m actually rather hopeful for our youngsters. Great guests. Great show.”

 

Thank you so much!

 

[1:43:05]

 

The Resident Baker gave $5. Thank you very much. He said:

 

“Great guests and great show. Here’s this week’s contribution to the Red Bull fund.”

 

Thank you so much, my friend. Winter Phoenix Forest Kieran gave $5. Thank you so much! She said:

 

“Hope you enjoyed the Sakura pictures I sent you.”

 

Thank you so much! And she said:

 

“My first hanami was beautiful and life changing. Have you ever been to Japan, Mark? Or you, Joel?”

 

No, I haven’t, but I would like to go. What about you, Joel? Have you ever been to Japan?

 

Joel Davis: No, I haven’t been to Japan, but the subject of Japan, I think, illustrates my previous points. I mean, Japan is part of the American led world order, but has proven far more resistant to a lot of the same forces that beset the rest of the West, which I think indicates that if you have sufficient domestic resistance to a lot of these policies, ultimately, the Americans don’t have the power to just totally foist the entire political order upon you, even though they would like to, and they do have a negative influence.

 

I’ve never been to Japan, actually. I have been to Tokyo Airport on my way to Europe, but it doesn’t really count!

 

Mark Collett: No, but you have set foot on Japanese soil, which is more than I’ve done. I would like to go. Eugene Greenbeard said:

 

“Have any of you watched Scorsese film Silence that was made in 2016. It’s his most blatantly Catholic keynote. It’s really inspiring stuff. Just a historically accurate drama about a couple of Europeans struggling for faith in a torturous foreign environment. It’s about Jesuits, though, so that might be a detriment.”

 

I haven’t seen that. I’m obviously a massive, … And thank you for the $5. I’m a massive fan of Scorsese, but that isn’t one of the films that I’ve seen of his. Have you seen it, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: No, I haven’t, but it sounds interesting.

 

Mark Collett: Okay. Flying Dutchman gave $25.

 

Thank you so much, my friend. And he said:

 

“Good work.”

 

Kerry Boo gave £5. Thank you very much. And said:

 

“Sydney Harbour Bridge is anti-semitic!”

 

Thank you so much! And Charlie Boy gave £5 and said:

 

“Great show tonight. Thanks, lads.”

 

We still have more Superchats. $1 from Cat Hugger. It’s great to see you again, Cat Hugger. And she said:

 

“Seeing Joel hard respecting Serena has motivated me to go mog some Leftists. Thank you, brother. Thank you so much!

 

24 Hours gave $5 thank you so much! And said:

“Great show and great guests, too. Thank you very much.”

 

[1:45:32]

 

Well, thank you to you, my friend. And Scaredy Cat gave $3. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Hi, Joel. For the first time, I walked into a grocery shop, Aldi, a German chain I’ve seen in USA’s New York, Maryland and Pennsylvania. I was pleasantly surprised by low price and high quality, e.g., $1.59 for chocolate versus $3.39 for a Hershey bar in other stores, tell your friends to buy household goods at Aldi’s.”

 

We have Aldi here in the UK and I actually do quite like it. It’s a budget chain, but it’s actually pretty good. They have some good deals, they have plenty of good stuff, which is outside of the, … They sort of make their own brands and their brands are pretty good. And they have taken a huge chunk of business from the big main brand superstores like Tesco and Sainsbury.

 

So when you’re walking around so much so that when you’re walking around Tesco now, you’ll see stickers everywhere saying, Aldi price Match. Because they’re absolutely terrified. They’re absolutely terrified that Aldi are taking all the business. And obviously with the sort of cost of living crisis and the fact that things are going through the roof when it comes to price, the main supermarkets are terrified of budget change. Have you heard of Aldi, Joel? Do you have that in the down under?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we have Aldi in Australia as well. I don’t particularly like it. I think their knockoff brands for a lot of products are quite bad. I would never do my main shop there. I don’t think their vegetables are as good quality or their meats are as good quality, either as the main supermarket here, which is Woolworths.

 

Mark Collett: Woolworths?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: That’s amazing. We used to have a department store in the UK called Woolworths, which was like a household name. It was so popular here in the 80s. And as an 80s kid you grew up and everyone knew Woolworths. You could get your clothes there, we could get everything there. But they also had this massive stand of what was called “picker mix sweets” and they were famous for Woolworths picker mix. And then Woolworths just died out. That was it. It was gone. It went bankrupt and went pop.

 

So I don’t know whether that’s the same Woolworths that we had.

 

Joel Davis: Don’t think so. It doesn’t sound like it. Woolworths is like a supermarket. It’s like the equivalent of Sainsbury’s or Tesco.

 

[1:48:00]

 

Mark Collett: That is a bit different to the one we had. With it being the same name, I didn’t know if it was related because there were several stores in the UK in my era. One of them was Woolworths, one of them was BHS, which stood for British Home Stores. And these were big department stores where people used to regularly used to go. They were well loved, they were household names, almost British institutions, and all of them are gone now.

 

And since over the last few years, we’ve seen Morgo with the likes of Mother Care, which again, was a British institution, and I actually find it pretty sad to see all these companies go under. And for us to lose these High Street names because it pushed us more down the road of just everyone ordering stuff from the supermarket or from Amazon. And the High Street, which was once a place where you could go out, you’d meet people, you’d have a day out, a Saturday out, shopping, all of that’s going.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I always say one good thing about Aldi is in the alcohol section, they do have some good deals. Usually you can only buy in Australia, you either buy like, a 24 pack of beer, or a six pack. But at Aldi they have these twelve packs, which is often, like, just like the kind of right amount for an evening. So I do appreciate that because the six pack is usually, …

 

Mark Collett: You drink twelve beers to yourself in an evening?

 

Joel Davis: I mean, sometimes. I don’t drink twelve beers every day!

 

Mark Collett: No, but sometimes you have, … And of these beers, how much is in one of these beers?

 

Joel Davis: Like 330 ml.

 

Mark Collett: Like a can of Coke’s worth?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But usually, … In England, do you have a lot more of, like, the big cans?

 

Mark Collett: Yeah. When you were saying twelve beers, I was like, wow, that’s the big cans in England are almost a pint of beer in a can. So I was going to say, if you’re drinking twelve pints a night, that’s a substantial amount of beer.

 

Joel Davis: That’s what’s good about in England, you get like the big four pack and that’s like the equivalent of, say, almost eight of these smaller ones, but six isn’t quite enough!

 

But then you don’t want to buy a 24!

 

And also the six packs are like, wildly overpriced, like they’re almost half the price of a 24 pack.

 

Mark Collett: Couldn’t you buy like, a 24 pack and just put the extra ones in the fridge? Or you’re one of those people that’s just impulsive and once you’ve got the 24, they have to be drunk on the spot.

 

Joel Davis: [chuckling] No, you can, but.

 

Mark Collett: What kind of madman putting this beer in the fridge for a week!

 

Joel Davis: No, I mean, I have done that! It’s not like I don’t do this, but I just like the twelve pack. I think it’s a nice convenient amount.

 

Mark Collett: Okay. We’ve got an amazing Superchat here from Cheesy. WhatsApp, for £100. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“Great show!”

 

[1:50:56]

 

Well, thank you so much for your generosity, my friend. That means an incredible amount! And I’ve said this before to all these people who send generous Superchats. If you’re ever in my area, I’ll happily take you out for dinner.

 

And if you contact me, I will send you a signed copy of my book. So thank you so much, my friend.

 

We have gone off on a lot of tangents tonight. I find Joel, like, a really curious guy. And I don’t mean that in a bad way, but you are a curious chap. I just imagine you sat at home grumbling without any media to watch because you don’t like anything with your gourmet burger and like 24 beers!

 

Joel Davis: [chuckling] I’m not exclusively a gourmet burger guy. I do like McDonald’s, I am normal. But you said it was like my last meal before I die. So I was going to go for the gourmet option.

 

Mark Collett: You know what I’d go for? If it was the last meal before I died and I was eating out, it would be the all you can eat steak restaurant. That would be it. But if it was at home, …

 

Joel Davis: You kind of got to order that delivery, though. You ought to eat it fresh! Like, as soon as it, …

 

Mark Collett: Of course you can’t order it delivery. They carve it at your table. I can’t order 24 waiters with 30 cuts of steak to tramp through my house and cut it at my kitchen table. That would be even absurd by Nero standards.

 

If I was just eating at home. It would obviously be like a Chinese or an Indian. And I’d go for a Chinese because I like the variety. I like having a good sort of three or four dishes, some starters, a selection tray. That would be my happy place with a few computer games, a Red Bull, but no beer for me. I’m not really a beer guy. I tend to find it leaves me bloated and feeling a bit rough.

 

And also, now I’m past the age of 40, if I have more than sort of one drink, you can guarantee I have to go to the toilet four times through the night and I get no sleep. How old are you, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: I’m 28.

 

Mark Collett: 28, mate! You’ve got a good twelve years of scratching your head and wondering what I’m thinking about. Then on your 40th birthday, you’ll be like:

 

“God, that madman Collett, he was right. I’ve been up to the toilet four times in the night after having a few beers.”

 

Life comes at me.

 

Joel Davis: That doesn’t sound very good. [chuckling]

 

Mark Collett: [chuckling] As you get older, everything gets a lot worse. Everything gets a lot worse. And I’ll tell you this. Things that you took for granted when you were a younger man, you can no longer take for granted. They sort of catch you up.

 

[1:53:22]

 

Now, I don’t really drink alcohol, but they do catch you up.

 

And one thing that I noticed was when I was a young man about your age, I’d go out for a run or I’d do an exercise and you’d sort of tweak your calf muscle. You’d have a bit of a pull on your thigh or something and you’d literally run it off and the next morning you’d wake up and go don’t even know that happened. Now in my forties. You go for a run and you pull a muscle in your calf and you sort of sideline for a month or so and you do notice great changes in your body, and I’m not preaching to you.

 

But one thing I will say is that over time I did phase drink out of my life because it was having a really negative effect upon my life. And the Woodlander says he’s ancient, but if he has a barrel of rum every night and sleeps well yeah, I don’t know, maybe it’s just me. Maybe it’s just old man Mark who can’t hold his beer!

 

But I don’t know, I used to really drink when I used to drink I used to drink sort of gin and tonics. I used to have a good time sort of buying different gins, making them with different selections of fruit and things like that and that was quite nice. And that never really had that effect on me. It’s just beer has always left me bloated.

 

Joel Davis: So you don’t drink at all? You never drink ever?

 

Mark Collett: Not really. I sort of gave it up because it just had such a negative effect on my body.

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know how you do that in England because when I was in England, I was like what is there really to do here other than go to the pub? It seems like the only real activity in the whole country.

 

Mark Collett: No, look, it sounds odd, and it sounds a bit sort of like insular but as I’ve grown up I found that a good night out would cost me the next day with being hungover.

 

And as I got older I was just like, I can’t mortgage a day of my life every time I want to go out on the beer. So I gave it up. I gave that up. It wasn’t something I wanted to do any further and I moved forward.

 

And now I’ve got a family and I’ve essentially got a wife and child. I know I’m not legally married to her but she’s effectively my wife, and I’ve got a child. Things like a Sunday, I can’t wake up sort of hanging at sort of 10:00 in the morning and not be there. I love doing stuff with my family, I love having days out.

 

I cherish moments like Sunday morning mowing the lawn with my daughter or planting vegetables in our little vegetable garden and going out for a walk. When it’s tadpole season, I always take her up to the fields and we go to the ponds and she sees the tadpoles developing. And just little things like that that mean a lot to me.

 

[1:56:03]

 

And I like to get a lot done, and I’m not preaching, but I just found alcohol was extremely expensive, and was actually holding me back from some of the dearer things in life. Because it sort of started acting as a blockade, and it stopped being something fun, and it started being something that was millstone round my neck. And also something you’ll find in later life that you do end up with a massive belly if you’re drinking a lot. And that’s something I still like to do my running. I still like to do exercise.

 

Yeah, I just found alcohol was just a negative and I’m not absolute on it. If I’m at a birthday party, or a wedding, or a funeral and people are having a toast, of course I’ll have a drink. I’m not going to slap it away.

 

But at the same time, the heavy nights out, something I put behind me.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, that makes sense. The whole point of it is to enjoy it. So if you’re having a bad time, why do it?

 

Mark Collett: Yeah. I like to see people clean living. I think we as nationalists, and I find this very important, we are sort of the last of a dying breed. There aren’t that many of us. We’re few in number. And I do think there is definite mileage in living that clean living life and pursuing the better things.

 

And as I say, I’m all for a good time and I will have a glass every now and again, but I don’t indulge like I used to, because I could see the negativity it brought upon me. And personally speaking, I’m not telling anyone how to live their life. But I’ve never tried any banned substance, I’ve never used any banned substances in my life. No weed, no drugs, nothing! And I do like having that, being able to say that, because I’m proud of the fact I’ve steered away from that. And I have seen a lot of people’s lives ravaged by drink and drugs and other things.

 

So without coming too heavy at the end of the show. I do understand that a lot of people within our movement suffer from an acute depression. They suffer from issues to do with the crushing despair they feel of the real world pounding down on them every day. And I think when you’re in that place, which many nationalists are, feeling atomised, isolated, alone, if you get into the habit of drinking, it can become more than something that’s just social and starts to become escapism. And I’ve helped a lot of nationalists who’ve had problems with alcohol.

 

[1:58:50]

 

So it is something that I am nervous of, because I think what we face is so crushing for our souls, that if there is an easy way out, I fear some people might take it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, that’s definitely true. I’ve seen it ruin a lot of people’s lives as well. Myself, it’s more of just a social thing or like the only real indulgence that remains for me with sports, other than I did enjoy the World Cup. But increasingly difficult to enjoy much sports ball is the UFC. I don’t mind having a few drinks and so on while watching the fights. It just feels appropriate.

 

But, yeah, in Australia, we have a very strong drinking culture, obviously. And socially, it’s just kind of particularly when you’re hanging out with young men, it’s often difficult to organise young men around other activities other than going to the pub. Which is why, I guess, the whole active club thing that nationalists have embraced is a great idea. It’s like, instead of meeting up to go to the pub, let’s meet up to train kickboxing or something, or go on a bushwalk.

 

And I think that’s a really positive thing.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah. And I try to encourage people to do different things, especially people who’ve got problems. Through Covid we set up the gaming club where people were playing games together. And a lot of young guys who were despairing trapped in just had somebody to talk to, because it’s a very social thing, it’s a team thing. There’s four of you playing on a team, you’ve got somebody to chat to every night. And I think it’s those little positive things that just help people through bad times.

 

And I do spend a lot of time on the phone, a lot of time emailing people who are in bad places. And it really does weigh on me, on my heart when I’m helping these people, because I understand the sadness they feel. And I just try and steer people away from things that could lead them further down a sort of a negative road.

 

And I do know that at one time, the pub was central to our community. And I acknowledge the importance of the pub and community politics that used to take place in the pub. But the fact is, most local pubs have now shut down in England, and people who drink are drinking supermarket goy swill at home to drown their sorrows. And that’s something I also found pretty depressing.

 

And that’s a depressing end for the show, but it shouldn’t be, because it’s been a brilliant show! And I’ve really enjoyed it.

 

[2:01:24]

 

And I’ve got to say, Joel, I know we always script out a show and we sort of have topics we want to cover, but one of the most enjoyable things about having Joel on is he’s a guy with takes on everything. So we’ve strayed a lot tonight, but I have really enjoyed it. So, Joel, thanks for being with us. Please have the final word and tell us where we can find you.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So follow me on Twitter at Joel Davisx. You can follow me on Telegram. Also, my Telegram handle is Joel Davisx put the X on the end because Joel Davis was already taken on Twitter. And that when I made my Telegram, I used the same handle. And you could find me on Youtube @youtube.com at Joel Davisvideoes. And you can find the Joel and Blair Show on Youtube@youtube.com. On Odyssey, you can find me there, as mentioned.

 

But if you go to any of those bio dot link slash Joeldavis, you can find all my links. So you could just go there to find everything in one stop shop.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, well, thank you so much for being with us. I’ll be back on Friday with Dr. David Duke. And for our weekly video, I’ll be back on Sunday night for the Nationalist A-Team. Thank you to everyone. Thank you to Joel. Thank you to everyone who donated so very generously. From the bottom of my heart, I can’t thank you enough.

 

And remember, you can still donate after the show if you wish, via crypto. All those donations go to a wonderful cause. Thank you so much! And thank you especially to the wonderful people who dug so deep tonight.

 

And as I always say, at the end of every show, the biggest thank you goes to every one of the viewers. Please, like, please share, please spread the message. And please be back same time next week because the indomitable Warren Balogh will be here. Thank you so much! Look after yourselves, stay strong, keep fighting, and I’ll see you all again soon.

 

And if you want a real white pill, check out my Telegram after the show for the footage of the Long Eaton demonstration that took place on Sunday. Thank you, everyone. Love you all. Good night. See you same time next week. Thank you.

 

[2:03:33]

 

 

END

top

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of Apr 27, 2023 = 1017)

Mark Collett
1 day ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

3
2
Strawberry_Lynn
1 day ago
Diane Abbot – MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington – has been suspended from her job as a whip for stating that “Jewish people are not subject to the same racism as some other minorities.” She was punished for saying something negative about Jews.
Some time ago, she stated that “All whites are racist.” And received no punishment whatsoever

17
0
Sam Melia
1 day ago
Night everyone

14
0
Hide replies
Another Anglo-Saxon
1 day ago
Hi Sam it was great to meet you the other day at Long Eaton (I was the guy in the Balaclava). Thanks for stopping to chat. Also I’m sure you already know but loads of people including me were trying to come over to support PA but the police wouldn’t let us through and there were plenty watching from the back who weren’t in the counter. I do hope PA continues to go from strength to strength, internal politics aside the message and organisation are great.

7
0
Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Go full nat Soc

11
2
Hide replies
Another Anglo-Saxon
1 day ago
Bad idea if you want to actually create change. Aurelian Verhassel puts it perfectly – 3rd Reich fantasists want to do roman salutes, we want to create change.

2
7
Hide replies
Beer Hall Pooch
18 hours ago
The ideals rather than the practice is that to which I refer. There is no inter-war period; no Fuhrer worship; and I wasn’t terribly happy with the vague and outdated 25-points. You are correct in your response.

5
0
the woodlander
1 day ago
see yer you lot

5
0
the woodlander
1 day ago
great stream. thanks mark n joel

5
0
Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
All the more reason to make our own pubs with a gazebo and a crate on a stretch of grass. Fk the pigs. Build community again

6
0
Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
I don’t drink any alcohol.

4
0

@Mut_zum_Wut
21 hours ago
Shlomo wants you drinking alcohol and smoking weed and looking at porn. And watching new movies and Netflix and professional sports.

3
0
𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐄𝐖
1 day ago
WARREN! WARREN! WARREN! WARREN!

8
4
Hide replies

@NormalStyleCrew
19 hours ago
Indeed. and whoever hit dislike on this is a coward

1
0

@harry_haller123
16 hours ago
Warren is the best. A great man who truely cares about our people one day I hope to shake his hand.

1
0
Hide replies

@NormalStyleCrew
5 hours ago
You will. Just get yourself vetted. Join your local supporter group

Tony
1 day ago
NJP \o

3
0
the woodlander
1 day ago
i got my whole workplave together once a week through lockdowns… because lockdowns are gay

4
0

@Mut_zum_Wut
21 hours ago
HH!

3
0
ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Thanks Joel for everything

3
1
withey
1 day ago
sod the church sod the pub we need a new community hub

3
0
Veruka’s Goyishe Kopf
1 day ago
no goyslop

2
0

@Dude
17 hours ago
7:00
aren’t aboriginies from australia some of the lowest iq in the world? makes sense why joel would be bringing them up. Australia is a backwater and joel is paid to re-enforce such….

1
0
Native Ausnian
19 hours ago
What is David dukes channel to watch the Friday show?

1
0
Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
WARREN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2
0
Hide replies

@NormalStyleCrew
19 hours ago
one of our kings

1
0
Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Warren is great

2
1

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
The official Patriotic Alternative website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk
Patriotic Alternative Official on Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticAlternativeOfficial
Join us at Patriotic Alternative:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/play-your-part

2
0

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Joel Davis on Bio Link:
https://bio.link/joeldavis

1
0
Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
I WANT TO BE A TEENAGER AGAIN ~~

3
1
Hide replies
GusinLanzarote Alt Right
9 hours ago
If I could go back to the Day I finished my A levels in 1997- I would be a millionaire today- who was more gym toned & a fluent pianist. I wouldnt WASTE 3 years of my life at shitty Exeter University for a start- there is NOTHING I learnt there I couldnt teach myself reading or
by listening to clever people on streams. And I wouldnt WASTE countless hours sitting in pubs with Normie pals who I never even see now chatting shiit & holding back from saying anything too based + I would spare myself all those headaches from excess drinking in shit nightclubs- you meet FAR nicer classier smarter ladies chatting when sober eg at the gym

Hide replies
Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 hour ago
Don’t women generally claim they don’t want men approaching them when at the gym?

𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐄𝐖
1 day ago
damn odysee, you try to respond to someone, and the chat hops and now you;ve blocked tham and have to go unblock… they really need to fix this

2
0

@dsallen7
1 day ago
$10.00
After Tucker’s recent anti-White outburst, I’m all out of sympathy for him. But he was never actually pro-White. He merely pretended to be in order to drive viewership. He had a few good ideas over the years, but he’s not worth defending.

1
0
Hide replies
GusinLanzarote Alt Right
10 hours ago
He went near enough to the line on occasion to push some UKIP Civ Nats into curiously exploring our streams & looking at our ideas. Hence if he pushed just a single patriot into our movement- he deserves some praise for that even if he personally disagrees with much of our philosophy. We must be flexible- I say to people you dont have to agree with me; you dont have to be a White Nationalist like me- as long as you are prepared to debate/ discuss with me in a friendly manner- you are not my enemy. My enemy is the totalitarian libtard who wants to suppress me, silence me, sack me from my job, ban me from social media. We have PLENTY of enemies my friend- we dont need to look for more amongst those 50-60% of the way towards our truth

@celestialdruid
8 hours ago
Joel “I love schizophrenic black rappers” Davis.

1
0

@LargeinCharge
15 hours ago
Mark and Joel “we’re such hardcore nationalists – Non-White shit food merchants TAKE MY MONEY!! ”. Pathetic – try and live by your supposed “values”

2
2

@NormalStyleCrew
19 hours ago
Warren shall rise as the most frequent guest in pwr/twotar history. and possibly as the new co host of the progrum. thats the rumor im spreading

1
0

@NormalStyleCrew
19 hours ago
Hello everybody

1
0

@LudditeStrength
23 hours ago
Totally forgot about TruedilTom. What a throwback

1
0
All watched over by machines of love and grace
1 day ago
TrueDilton!? Holy shit i havent heard that name in years! He made some awesome videos.

1
0
mb14
1 day ago
thank you for the nice words Mark. I feel motivated to stop drinking now.

1
0
ChuckGerety
1 day ago
I tried a Bud Light Lime rita beer and theres way to much sugar in it

1
0
Tony
1 day ago
Randbot drinks 12 beers a show

1
0
wayha
1 day ago
Now Joel is right here :grinning:

1
0
Fearless sunshine
1 day ago
ALDI is German owned

1
0

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
Throw Hollywood into the Pit !

1
0

@Glen19
1 day ago
1
Have you seen WhiteHouse release of Public Law 93-148? Do you think is military intervening in all of the African countries bordering the Nile in the interest of Zionists? Their plan of Greater Israel is from the Nile to the Euphrates. Is the intervention in East Africa for Israel?

1
0

@hellopossums
1 day ago
Australians will vote yes because they don’t want to be wayciss

1
0

@HippyHop
4 hours ago
Mark is the ultimate Chad. For real? Helping White men on their resumes? What a guy!

0
1
Dbar
13 hours ago
All I hear is an imperialist bragging about how Australians killed a lot of Europeans and turned Europe into what it is now.

0
1

@harry_haller123
16 hours ago
I think Joel is doing a good job appealling to gruggs such as myself of late. Kudos. Its always interesting to hear whats going on In Austrailia. Did you guys see in Spain they exhumed the remians of Primo de Rivera yet again. THEY want anything right wing erased from history.

0
1
Dissident Echoes
21 hours ago
Joel is always worth listening to. Great commentator.

2
3

@EnglishRose
1 day ago
A great guest in Joel and thank you for a wonderful stream, Goodnight all

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
I hope Stipe Mioch beats down Jon Jones in UFC 288

0
1
Hide replies

@Ericbloodaxe
21 hours ago
bread and circus

2
0

@Vivec
1 day ago
Rum / whiskey is the way to go then

0
1
Veruka’s Goyishe Kopf
1 day ago
i like his Telegram channel

1
1

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@dinolegovich1964
:thumbs_up:

1
1
ChuckGerety
1 day ago
The best show on Odysee

1
1

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Joel Davis:
Twitter:
Tweets by joeldavisx
Telegram:
https://t.me/joeldavisx
YouTube:
https://tinyurl.com/ycy8b59b
Cozy:
https://cozy.tv/joeldavis
Odysee:

@joeldavis

0
1

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Blair Cottrell:
Telegram:
https://t.me/realblaircottrell
Gab:
https://gab.com/RealBlairCottrell
Odysee:

@BlairCottrell

0
1
Baxter
1 day ago
TRS guys are irrelevant boomers.

1
2
Veruka’s Goyishe Kopf
1 day ago
hit the button

1
2
Veruka’s Goyishe Kopf
1 day ago
i lived in Japan for a year. it was amazing. my bf got deported back to the USA. lol

0
2

@Biancus_Vendetta
1 day ago
Joel has the antifa phenotype

0
3

@123
1 day ago
Mark is weak

2
7
Nonbinary-cis-white-woman-of-colour
57 minutes ago
Feck Odysee. Where can I find the Handsome Truth now?

GusinLanzarote Alt Right
10 hours ago
Mark’s idea the British race will die out bit by bit quietly I cannot see it. Will Britain become like a chilly Brazil I cant see it. Even in Brazil- particularly in the south; there are still an awful lot of mainly white folk who tend not to miscegenate. Another factor is that most Brazilians of whatever shade tend to identify strongly with the nation rather than some sub group within it. Britain’s ethnic groups-seem determined to hang on to the identities/ cultures resonant of the 3rd world dumps they fled from. Hence the end game of multiculturalism is 2 or 3 rival nations within 1 “nation” competing for scarce resources. Yes there will be some mixed folk & maybe even some white identifying ethnics who remain in the white part- but the exception does not prove the rule as Justin Barret says. The Boomer luxuries that bought of a generation turning them into compliant sheeple are ending- the job for life, home ownership, 3 types of every food in the supermarket, pensions, foreign holidays it will all end in 30 years for the majority. The Question is can the Liberal elites find enough to keep bribing the population into compliance- particularly after they blew so much ££ on Covid hysteria…. If Nationalists like us cannot achieve power in 15 years or so- civil war is inevitable.. be it in 20, 50 or a 100 years it is coming. The Human being is a tribal group animal in times of scarcity- groups will fight for resources like troops of Chimps- Nature can only be suppressed temporarily.
Less

Caesar Avg
13 hours ago
I’m seeing the ‘Centre-Right’ being much more affected by Carlson’s firing than the ‘Far-Right’, where it is met with much more ambivalence. Carlson has made it abundantly clear countless times that he’s an enemy of the ‘Far-Right’ with his constant condemnation of so-called ‘identity politics’ and use of terms such as ‘fascist’ to derogatorily denote degenerate Left-liberals. The interview in which he said that ethnonationalists should F off should be the final straw.
As for the ‘Centre-Right’, they’re about to learn what it is to be in the position of the ‘Far-Right’: with their main man censored, the entrenchment of Left-wing hegemony over mass media is far closer to completion. I expect them to faff about as usual, ranting about how terrible the ‘Left-wing CommuNazis’ are as the Left continue to win victory after victory over them while they stick to old tropes about the ‘CommuNazi DemonKKKraps’ and their ‘plantations’, how MLK would be a Republican if he were alive today and similar half-witted drivel as they slowly dwindle away and their descendants enter into the ranks of the racially amorphous, pansexual, transsexual ‘man’ of the future for a time, soon after which their bloodlines will cease to exist consequent of losing the will and/or ability to reproduce (e.g. the transsexuals who butcher their sexual organs). They are, of course, entering into the same grounds that the ‘Far-Right’ have been in for decades, e.g. having no mass media representation.
Less

Native Ausnian
17 hours ago
I save $50 odd dollar’s shopping at Aldis, it is essential. I disagree with Joel on the quality, it’s all the same as woollies

Native Ausnian
17 hours ago
Bad boy bubby is grotesque

jenkembonanza
23 hours ago
I love you Joel, my brother.

@Mut_zum_Wut
1 day ago
\o

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@RichSussex
You’re most welcome.

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@NightNationReview
He’s live now?

𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐄𝐖
1 day ago
EEx Live | White Flight Wednesday| April 26, 2023
EEx Live | White Flight Wednesday| April 26, 2023
WhiteRabbitRadioTV: EEx Live | White Flight Wednesday| April 26, 2023
More

@RichSussex
1 day ago
Thanks for all the links

@ReedJohnson

Deboon
1 day ago
o7

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
GOODEVENING BROTHERS AND SISTERS

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Mark Collett on Telegram
https://t.me/markacollett

14Reasons
1 day ago
white rabbit radio is live now for after the show:

@dsallen7
1 day ago
o/

withey
1 day ago
14

@RichSussex
1 day ago
Great stream & great guest! Evening all 14

mb14
1 day ago
good night

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Bye!

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
14

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
take care everyone

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
CHEERS!

withey
1 day ago
goodnight all 14/88 28

@RoryHerbert
1 day ago
Good night good folks.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Thanks folks. Have a great night.

@Oldmotherearth
1 day ago
night all

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
o7

@BritishGammon
1 day ago
Night folks 14

@malinformation
1 day ago
\o

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@14Reasons
good to see you fren

the woodlander
1 day ago
you can also find him in lidel, buying 12 beers…

Tony
1 day ago
o/ Mark

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
thanks mark and joel

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Mark Collett:
Telegram
https://t.me/markacollett
BitChute
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/IYXqC1BYZH31/
Gab
https://gab.com/markcollett
The Fall of Western Man
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

@SteveOfWessex
1 day ago
WP chat have a great evening o/

Speak your mind
1 day ago
Thanks Mark and Joel, great session.

@BritishGammon
1 day ago
Interesting show tonight

14Reasons
1 day ago

@TheThinRedLine
ah

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Joel Davis:
Twitter:
Tweets by joeldavisx
Telegram:
https://t.me/joeldavisx
YouTube:
https://tinyurl.com/ycy8b59b
Cozy:
https://cozy.tv/joeldavis
Odysee:

@joeldavis

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@Woodlader.4
Well-said.

@AlbionForever
1 day ago

@Woodlader.4
lol based

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
Times have changed and new ‘pubs’ required

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Goyswill. Lol.

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@mb14
you can do it , take it one day of the time

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
I would suggest not drinking as it really doesnt provide any real positives in life

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Join the Patriotic Alternative gaming group on Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticGamers

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@14Reasons
maybe so but I wasted years on that shit not to mention thousands of dollars

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
Yes . It improves not retards

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
A bush walk sounds fun.

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
get*

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
I left getting cranked drunk in my 20s. You hot over 30 and it isnt fun anymore

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Is anime

14Reasons
1 day ago

@TheThinRedLine
if that’s your biggest regret you didn’t do much terrible at all in your life

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
lol

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Beer Hall Pooch on Twitter:
Tweets by BeerPooch

𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐄𝐖
1 day ago
opioids and cannabis are like this too

@123
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
lol

@Carlota
1 day ago
Celebrate every little win in life

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Spring Water hall Putsch

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
I used to smoke a lot of weed it is my biggest regret and I am never going to touch that shit again

14Reasons
1 day ago

@malinformation
I know what it’s for lol and yes but when you start getting large doses of kratom there is no difference

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
it is important to not be completely blacked pilled

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Eeeh? Why was my alcohol + fire comment removed? It was a joooke~!

Veruka’s Goyishe Kopf
1 day ago
same

@malinformation
1 day ago

@14Reasons
If it’s an alternative to opiates, kratom is the better option. For sure, but I’m just stating its still addictive and dangerous.

@123
1 day ago
drugs can have bad sides

14Reasons
1 day ago

@WinterPhoenixForestKirin
lol no

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
But the best PA Nationalist day was the Kendal Hall Putsch were all were merry and forming a Brotherhood

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon on the left side of this page for a like!

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Maybe we should all take steroids, though.

14Reasons
1 day ago

@malinformation
kratom is least of my concerns with what I take for pain.take a wild guess. kratom effects the same receptors so yes, the withdrawal can be like morphine withdrawal if you take enough daily

ChuckGerety
1 day ago

@malinformation
I hear ya. Kratom got me going but would put me in bad mood swings

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@123
Fight a drunk or a Sober man ?

Veruka’s Goyishe Kopf
1 day ago
I’ll have a bourbon from time to time

@123
1 day ago
Reality == kind-of-lame

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@dinolegovich1964
very true

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
Reality > drugs

Tony
1 day ago
somber Joel

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
The show to catch a predator used mikes hard lemonade and they actually sued them for that

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Joel looks very sad

the woodlander
1 day ago
good man mark…

@AlbionForever
1 day ago
Don’t want to end up with a massive gunt like Nick Griffin.

@malinformation
1 day ago

@14Reasons
I was severely addicted to kratom, took years to get off it. Be warned.

@IPF89
1 day ago
salut!

@123
1 day ago
awwww, such a good dad

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
CHEERS!

14Reasons
1 day ago

@WinterPhoenixForestKirin
kek k

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Remember Mikes Hard Lemonade?

@123
1 day ago
gotta play with the kid

@DarthGreenslade
1 day ago
pick and mix

Runt’s Meadow
1 day ago
Joel really undertands this country

Tony
1 day ago
Good call , Nobody wants to end up like Top Cat

withey
1 day ago
alcohol is too expensive, i dislike the taste so i don’t drink unless it’s a special occasion

14Reasons
1 day ago
there is healthier substances. ie kratom and you end up more functional

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
I don’t drink everyday but a few days a month

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
lots of sugar in alcohol

@AlbionForever
1 day ago
*not the Chinese fighter jet

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@14Reasons
Based and Stoic-pilled

Veruka’s Goyishe Kopf
1 day ago
same

@AlbionForever
1 day ago
go to the pub just have a J20

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Irish Whiskey

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
I stopped 3 years ago. It’s been much better for me

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Joel Davis on Bio Link:
https://bio.link/joeldavis

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@Woodlader.4
BASED

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you’ve accidentally blocked someone on Odysee:
https://odysee.com/$/settings/block_and_mute

the woodlander
1 day ago
im bloody ancient… ill have a barrel of rum and sleep well..

14Reasons
1 day ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
lol. my metabolism can barely handle 3 beers. I get wasted with 2. never drink and my genetics

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@NightNationReview
Yesterday that got me 3 times in a row for the same comment I was trying to reply to!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Odysee donations: Click the ‘Support’ button or click the ‘$’ below the chat box.

@SerenaJB
1 day ago
There’s the black pill,

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Beauty is in the eye of the BEER holder

@123
1 day ago
you will be ok until 40s

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Deer taste great

14Reasons
1 day ago
I never drink myself either

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
lol

@123
1 day ago
hahahahaha

the woodlander
1 day ago
quite like a gin

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
I tried moonshine and it messed me up quick

@123
1 day ago
Beer is the most calorific

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
Not a bad idea.

Tony
1 day ago
G&Tea yeah

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
after a barrel of rum most people sleep well

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson
I always have that open on another tab

Veruka’s Goyishe Kopf
1 day ago
facts

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
The Prostate is waiting, patiently waiting

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
I don’t drink alcohol

0KT0BER
1 day ago
um

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@malinformation
Based AF

Veruka’s Goyishe Kopf
1 day ago
a mere fetus

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
28 is very young

@malinformation
1 day ago
I’d eat the brains from the skull of my enemy as a last meal.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@NightNationReview
\o

𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐄𝐖
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson
o/

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@14Reasons
Indeed I only ever drink 4-6 in a session. the culture of getting absolutely smashed always pissed me off. Cunts rolling around vomiting after drinking 12+ drinks in a night….. :roll_eyes:

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@NightNationReview
Thanks for your ongoing support.

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@MarkCollett
Oh! Can I “eat” a tactical nuke? Lol.

Tony
1 day ago
GenX Mark hell yeah dude

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
#24BeersGetEmIn

the woodlander
1 day ago
sounds like a normal guy

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
I get the Franzia box wine

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow 𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐄𝐖 on Odysee

@NightNationReview

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@MarkCollett
A gun, lol

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
lol

Bear With A Care
1 day ago
Goyslop.

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
Don’t get the Bud Light 12

@SerenaJB
1 day ago
Lol

Tony
1 day ago
Mogged

ChuckGerety
1 day ago

@withey
7.1

𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐄𝐖
1 day ago
$4.00
I always find it amusing when Mark gives his guests a hard time.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Free Mark Collett book | The Fall of Western Man
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

@123
1 day ago
lol

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Take us out fishing

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow British Gammon:
Twitter
Tweets by DesmondMakazi
Odysee

@BritishGammon

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@JellyTitschArse1066
Randbot is awesome

withey
1 day ago
what’s the alcohol content

@malinformation
1 day ago
Hops produce estrogen and complacency.

14Reasons
1 day ago

@RichSussex
get in line. everyone else does too!

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
ROFL CHAT

@BritishGammon
1 day ago
This stream has taken an unexpected turn

@UltimateTruth
1 day ago
Giant monopolies increasingly dominate the economy

14Reasons
1 day ago
that’s still tons of alcohol consumed at once

Tony
1 day ago

@14Reasons
%

@123
1 day ago
i’m implusive

@RichSussex
1 day ago
I like 14

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@Woodlader.4
haha

@IPF89
1 day ago
he’s an Aussie, Mark

the woodlander
1 day ago
just get the 24

Tony
1 day ago
VB mate

Veruka’s Goyishe Kopf
1 day ago
that’s a rack

14Reasons
1 day ago
rehab time !!intervention!

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
h dear, puritan Mark is off on one

@Vivec
1 day ago
Aussies are built different i guess xD

@123
1 day ago
smaller

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Anyone like Milwaukee Best beer?

@123
1 day ago
33ml

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
BOOM

14Reasons
1 day ago
that’s allot dude.

0KT0BER
1 day ago
lol

@123
1 day ago
a great man

Veruka’s Goyishe Kopf
1 day ago
whoah

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Lidl Stout is amazing

Bear With A Care
1 day ago
C&A is still around outside UK – went to one in Belgium several years back.

withey
1 day ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
thanks for the info

Veruka’s Goyishe Kopf
1 day ago
Aldi is German

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@malinformation
absolutely , the regime is coming for them and Korea as well

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@charlesgerety
Japan was lost in 1945. Understand the juden takes the long road. Slowing increasing lgbt culture, multiculturalism etc. They know they can’t simply do it overnight (boiling frog anaology)

@Vivec
1 day ago

@TheThinRedLine
They’re even pushing LBGTQ there now. They want total world domination.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Cathugger
Telegram
https://t.me/Cathuggersedits
Fiverr
https://www.fiverr.com/perfectedmemory

wayha
1 day ago
Japan would sink without Russian oil. It has no choice. It also has the EU backing in this stance.

@malinformation
1 day ago

@TheThinRedLine
Someone should warn them

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@Vivec
Howdy!

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Silence (2016 film)
https://tinyurl.com/22yzxa54

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Up till recently multiculturalism has not been pushed on Japan

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Woolworths is Aus for Tesco

Veruka’s Goyishe Kopf
1 day ago
wow Woolworth is a blast from the past!

@UltimateTruth
1 day ago
Pick n Mix

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@Vivec
yes they do , they will destroy all of the world including China and the middle east

Veruka’s Goyishe Kopf
1 day ago
their organic produce is okay

@WingITprod
1 day ago
Aldi rox!

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

the woodlander
1 day ago
use the farm shop….

Veruka’s Goyishe Kopf
1 day ago
same company that owns Trader Joe’s

Lost in Western Society
1 day ago
Aldi is the best discounter there is.

@Carlota
1 day ago
All city centers are the same now

Veruka’s Goyishe Kopf
1 day ago
very sad

@SerenaJB
1 day ago
Timothy Whites

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
It was called woolworths in NZ in the 80’s/90’s they changed it to countdown. It is owned by Progressive Enterprises LTD. All week they’ve been asking every customer to donate to Rainbow Youth. Progressive indeed.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow SerenaJB on Twitter:
Tweets by SerenaJB3

RoadRunner
1 day ago
remember C&A

Rufus Page
1 day ago
Woolworth’s cafe was the business

@SerenaJB
1 day ago
Littlewoods

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
“manchester” is Aus bedding department

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Be cool for us to discuss AI and genetic manipulation in the future

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
I LOVE JAPAN

@nutsNdolts
1 day ago
their power is like a blight that won’t stop spreading and ruining

the woodlander
1 day ago
so.. looks like orange hoods are the new right wing thing..

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Japan is one of the last holdouts

@Vivec
1 day ago
^

@malinformation
1 day ago

@wayha388
It’s flowing from Jewish control of America, and it flows from other sources as well

ArcadeFate65
1 day ago

@wayha388
*From Jews who control America

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow White Art Collective:
Bio Link:
https://bio.link/whiteartcollective
Website:
https://wacmedia.store/
Telegram:
https://t.me/wacannounce
Odysee:

@WhiteArtCollective

wayha
1 day ago
Mark is spot on . The poison is flowing from America

@Diogenes
1 day ago
it was a nice country, it just fell in with the wrong crowd

@Vivec
1 day ago

@WinterPhoenixForestKirin
o/

ArcadeFate65
1 day ago

@UltimateTruth
They are salting the earth now

@Vivec
1 day ago
They are a people without nation, the problem is the parasitic entity

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@WinterPhoenixForestKirin
yes

@malinformation
1 day ago
The J control other levers besides ZOG

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
The US will have to retreat once the dollar shrinks

@IPF89
1 day ago
the great satan – US empire

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@Vivec
Yes

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@UltimateTruth
If the Jews left, we could recover.

@Vivec
1 day ago
Those running america are the satanist not the country itself

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
The J control all Anglophone countries, though …

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
On the last part agree

@UltimateTruth
1 day ago
Judeo-America. If the Jews abandon ship (switch to China) the US could collapse

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
I don’t buy any of this. Joel is smart but, way off here

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
There are also a large number of Whites in America, so …

Fearless sunshine
1 day ago
mostqueerseatdinner@6

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
True

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Mark Collett:
Telegram
https://t.me/markacollett
BitChute
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/IYXqC1BYZH31/
Gab
https://gab.com/markcollett
The Fall of Western Man
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

wayha
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
correct.

@chamax1
1 day ago
way off

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Joel is way off here

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
Bingo

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
I don’t agree with Joel here

wayha
1 day ago
America has gone!

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
Ghey ‘Mirage’ in Asutralia was dictated by America

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Multiculturalism is pushed by the American regime

Fearless sunshine
1 day ago
America is filled with homos and muds and Traitors.

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
I agree. If we win in the US, it will be a big help.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
There are Jewish “elites” (tyrannical dictators) in every country, all around the world. Doesn’t matter who rises or falls, they win.

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@Woodlader.4
I can’t wait to see you put up tutorials on building your own castles. So cool!

@nutsNdolts
1 day ago
i wonder what political coalition will control u.s. and other american countries’ natural resources and remaining technical progress

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago

@Woodlader.4
Agreed

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon on the left side of this page for a like!

wayha
1 day ago
The EU is a puppet of USA.

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
^^^

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
america is defaulting on debts everyday

the woodlander
1 day ago
we need to walk away from this shit show sustem. build our own, let them rot in their own filth.

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Decline is different from complete collapse. I don’t see a complete dissolution.

wayha
1 day ago
China? Its a bigger economy that the USA. America is in decline with a dumb political elite

Mark Collett
1 day ago
https://unherd.com/2023/04/americas-empire-is-bankrupt/

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Disagree with Joel here

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
*White America

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
true

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
White American loves Japan

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago
yes

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
In the Cold War, Joel, no one was ditching the dollar

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
*it

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
the collapse petrol dollar is a good thing

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
Any System is only as good as the people in ti

@123
1 day ago
the USA is definitely on the DOWN.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
UnHeard | America’s empire is bankrupt:
https://unherd.com/2023/04/americas-empire-is-bankrupt/

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
1 day ago

@dinolegovich1964
Corrupt, but not broken. It was designed this way.

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
I think China will just continue the J subversion.

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
SMASH WASHINGTON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
that

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Sad for my country … but my country is controlled by parasites, so maybe it is necessary.

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Taht is what we need

Tony
1 day ago
Heil Dingo

Stuff about stuff
1 day ago
pmsl , good one

Stuff about stuff
1 day ago
beer pooch

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@Woodlader.4
The System is corrupt. The jailing was obscene for Pauline as well

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
rofl

14Reasons
1 day ago
lmfao yea

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago

@ScaredyCat
spacebar is fkd

the woodlander
1 day ago
i worked with john etteridge for a while in the late 80s.. jailed in the 90s for his work with pauline hanson in Australia. he was a switched on guy

Stuff about stuff
1 day ago
Alpha in da gaf

@AlbionForever
1 day ago
Sydney Harbour Bridge was built by the same company that built the Tyne Bridge in Newcastle.

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
very good

Fearless sunshine
1 day ago
Racial-Cultural DIVORCE negotiations..

Stuff about stuff
1 day ago
i don’t be cucked!!!!!!

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@ScaredyCat
Thanks again.

ScaredyCat
1 day ago
$3.00
Hi,Joel: For 1stTime I walked intoGroceryShop Aldi, a German chain I’ve seen inUSA’s NewYork,Maryland &Pennsylvania. I was pleasantlySurprised by lowPrice & highQuality,e.g., $1.59 Schogetten chocolate vs. $3.39 woke HersheyBar in otherStores.Tell YourFriends 2 buy food &household goods at Aldi’s !!

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
SO F-ING COOL!!!!!!

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
BASEEEEED!!!!!

ArcadeFate65
1 day ago

@GaelicNord
great point

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
BASED

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Jack Lang (Australian politician):
https://tinyurl.com/3s7mbfub

@DissidentThoughts
1 day ago
The tories ramped it up during covid while they ruined the lives & small buisnesses of Brits

withey
1 day ago

@Nightwalker
hail brother, i agree

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Almost $Aus 10 for a pint; Cambodia, $0.50 cents

@nutsNdolts
1 day ago
and if they run out of land on which to build more homes

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Is she cute?

RoadRunner
1 day ago
Orania was permitted as South Africa was given to blacks, not liberals.

wayha
1 day ago
We can not move anywhere when we dominate this nation. So move where?

Stuff about stuff
1 day ago
sorry for caps

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Exactly as intended

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
shameless

@Vivec
1 day ago

@GaelicNord
They were never pure really, they’re a mongrel race that intermix with whoever is in power at the moment.

the woodlander
1 day ago
shame it didnt stop here

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Odysee donations: Click the ‘Support’ button or click the ‘$’ below the chat box.

@GaelicNord
1 day ago
jews have wealth & “success” but it cost them their race. They no longer exist as any pure distinct semetic ethnic group. Theyre all mixed race. jews have lost the race war millennia ago really when you think about it. They’re literally the anti-race.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@TwentyFourHours
Thanks for your support.

@TwentyFourHours
1 day ago
$5.00
Great show & a great guest too. Thanks.

withey
1 day ago
when there is no more space to build new houses for immigrants, they’ll try to take our houses and replace them with tower blocks we can and must resist, homeless immigrants will be rampaging the police will have thir hands full…..bring it all on i’m ready

@Vivec
1 day ago
When times get harder they’ll come knocking, the issue isnt building, its defending those type of settlements.

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
Plenty of bugz to eat too !

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@123
Well, it is a start.

14Reasons
1 day ago
if it can’t defend itself , it’s inevitably with no chance

Tony
1 day ago
Jan Lamprecht says Orania is just a libertarian place that doesn’t have any real power

@123
1 day ago

@WinterPhoenixForestKirin
many 1000s but still very small

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Get out of the cities

@Woodlader.4
has shown the way. Flee to the fields

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Orania (Afrikaner town in the Northern Cape, South Africa):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orania

the woodlander
1 day ago
orania is a great example.. a viable alternative

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@123
They have … a few hundred?

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@Woodlader.4
Positive actions are the best for the Future

Stuff about stuff
1 day ago
Ireland calling S.O.S

14Reasons
1 day ago
orania has no hope. does it have nukes? how will it defend itself

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@Woodlader.4
Good point about the land issue, actually. I hadn’t thought about that!

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Nice

@123
1 day ago
Orainia is very very small

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Well said Joel, besides we were always outnumbered

the woodlander
1 day ago
we need to get busy building businesses and buying land, it is our land.

Stuff about stuff
1 day ago
How’s the form lad’s?

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
One can hope

@123
1 day ago
Excellent point – Jews – due to superior organising, have very much power.

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Not the identities of the minorities. It would be nothing without J control.

@RoryHerbert
1 day ago
Good evening

@Woodlader.4

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Joel Davis on Bio Link:
https://bio.link/joeldavis

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
No. It is J3wish financial power which is working well for them.

withey
1 day ago

@Woodlader.4
here here

Fearless sunshine
1 day ago
M :white_heart: C

the woodlander
1 day ago
re group, hold the line, rebuild, and show a viable alternative

Deboon
1 day ago
They Gotta Go Back!

@Diogenes
1 day ago
will Scot Adams now say get the F away from Dianne Abbot?

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
That is more depressing

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Catabolic collapse

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Free Mark Collett book, The Fall of Western Man
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Yup

@Warz
1 day ago
hello everyone

Tony
1 day ago
Randbot King of the desert is a much better show

Deboon
1 day ago
South Africa

the woodlander
1 day ago
itll slowly just get worse

@DarthGreenslade
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
yeah thats a classic

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Please consider a small donation of $3. When everyone donates $3, it adds up!
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
BAD TASTE

the woodlander
1 day ago

@WinterPhoenixForestKirin
sounds great

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Best Aus film: BAD TSTE

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
yikes

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
I really don’t know but it is kind of funny . Complain about it though

@Deboonkadonked

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
nice

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon on the left side of this page for a like!

@UltimateTruth
1 day ago
The ADL still holds huge sway over Twitter

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Can you talk about Js there?

Deboon
1 day ago
Or can Twitter ban you for having a VPN?

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Based

Deboon
1 day ago

@TheThinRedLine
But no one even knows me. Is it becouse it’s my google account and YouTube has censored me many times? Just doesn’t make sense

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@Deboonkadonked
your reputation proceeded you

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Beer Hall Pooch on Twitter:
Tweets by BeerPooch

Deboon
1 day ago
I’m suspended from Twitter. Never even posted on there, how can that even happen?

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@JellyTitschArse1066
Ultimate alliance

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Musk needs to step aside as CEO and Let

@SerenaJB
take over.

Fearless sunshine
1 day ago
Revelation 2 and 3:9 :snake:

Tony
1 day ago
PA \o/ NJP

14Reasons
1 day ago
it never changed

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
Oh? Do tell.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Joel Davis on Twitter:
Tweets by joeldavisx

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@GaelicNord
1 day ago
1.23
.

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Eww

Tony
1 day ago

Lill Frigg
1 day ago
Critical semite theory should be on curriculums world wide.

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@Woodlader.4
Hail, friend! I traveled all over Japan last month, including in the rural regions of it. It was nice!

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
i was kicked off in 2016. i did post a meme with neil degrassy tyson saying “more jews died in the holocaust then there are atoms in the universe. -science nibba” maybe that was it

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow The Woodlander:
Odysee

@Woodlader.4
Telegram
https://t.me/the_woodlander
YouTube
https://tinyurl.com/367pzrj4

Deboon
1 day ago

@TheThinRedLine
Did a week ago, still haven’t heard anything. Guess i’ll try again

@Diogenes
1 day ago
Elon means hello and goodbye

the woodlander
1 day ago

@WinterPhoenixForestKirin
evening

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago

@Mark
Musk can make a killing by platfroming Carlson and RFK’s election

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
racist snowball fights at school in 1992 re dpilled me

@SerenaJB
1 day ago
I used to watch his videos, but they were hard to understand.

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@Carlota
Blood is what matters, after all

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@Carlota
That’s cause they’re both racist

Tony
1 day ago
I remember that guy

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Cathugger
Telegram
https://t.me/Cathuggersedits
Fiverr
https://www.fiverr.com/perfectedmemory

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@Cathugger
Thanks for your donation.

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Bingo

@Cathugger
1 day ago
$1.00
seeing Joel hard respecting Serena has motivated me to go mogg some leftists. thank you brothers!

withey
1 day ago
hail serena

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@Eugene_Greenbeard
Thanks for your donation.

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
yup

Eugene Greenbeard
1 day ago
$5.00
Have any of you watched Scorsese’s Silence (2016)? It’s his most blatantly Catholic kino, and it’s really Inspiring stuff. Just a historically accurate drama about a couple of Europeans struggling for the faith in a torturous foreign environment. It’s about Jesuits tho, so that might be a detriment.

Tony
1 day ago
o/ Serena

@SteveOfWessex
1 day ago
Serena o/

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@SerenaJB
Really! I honor you for your service!

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
thanks serena

Baxter
1 day ago
o7

@SerenaJB
1 day ago
Hahaha! That’s me.

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@SerenaJB
o/

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
wow

@Historic
1 day ago
lmao

withey
1 day ago
14 for laughing at the jews 28 for laughing at diane abbot

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
She’s NOT n “old lady”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow SerenaJB on Twitter:
Tweets by SerenaJB3

@SerenaJB
1 day ago
Lol

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Jewish privilege

Baxter
1 day ago
serena is BASED

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
They never shut up. They never back off. They’ll never stop, until they’re stopped.

Deboon
1 day ago
Jewish fragility

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson
skill issue :sunglasses:

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Jews have to be number 1 on the oppression scale

@Diogenes
1 day ago
Jews got upset, I’m shocked, shockef

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
The NOSE knows

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
Hahaha

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Thin skinned.

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Let the Regime eat itself. Chin chin!

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@WinterPhoenixForestKirin
Thanks for your contribution.

Fearless sunshine
1 day ago
Cucking is easy when the cotton is high

Winter Phoenix Forest Kirin
1 day ago
$5.00
Hope you enjoyed the sakura pictures I sent you . My first ever 花見 (hanami) was beautiful and life-changing. Have you ever been to Japan, Mark? Or you, Joel?

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
that was great

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Odysee donations: Click the ‘Support’ button or click the ‘$’ below the chat box.

Deboon
1 day ago
Just me or is all video game protagonists female now?

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@sparkofspirit
Normalised and sold at the local shops

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Thundercats

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
She-Ra had a great rack

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
only got worse quick with even worse trash like hustler

withey
1 day ago
just preserve your racism, homophobia, islamophobia etc

@Diogenes
1 day ago
1
Mark I’m trying to get Tucker to go on the Dr. Duke show. I’ll get back to you.

Tony
1 day ago
Mark grew up when things were normal in the 80s

Fearless sunshine
1 day ago
trannies will save the White race by proxie..

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@sparkofspirit
Read this. It started in Hollywood too a long time ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Big_Sleep

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@sparkofspirit
Hugh Hefner was a total degenerate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Hefner

Tony
1 day ago
incel stuff isn’t good for zoomers, they’re depressed because of it

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
it started a long time ago with crap like playboy

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
onlyfans

@nutsNdolts
1 day ago
politics is concerned with power over reality overall it eventually affects personal lives

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
I agree politics is everywhere now

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@ourresidentbaker
Thanks for your ongoing support.

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
Keep the monsters away from children. Fairy Tales are based on Reality

withey
1 day ago

@r.madden
germans have it in them to change back they just need to find their spirit

Tony
1 day ago
America First loves that stuff too

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@123
Follow White Art Collective:
Bio Link:
https://bio.link/whiteartcollective
Website:
https://wacmedia.store/
Telegram:
https://t.me/wacannounce
Odysee:

@WhiteArtCollective

@Diogenes
1 day ago
14

Tony
1 day ago
14

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Odysee donations: Click the ‘Support’ button or click the ‘$’ below the chat box

withey
1 day ago
14

@123
1 day ago
$10.00
Do we have a directory of “our” artists?

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐄𝐖
1 day ago
very true Joel

The Resident Baker
1 day ago
$5.00
Great guest and great show. Here’s this week’s contribution to the Red Bull fund.

@WingITprod
1 day ago

@123
Tanx fer ask’n
https://www.youtube.com/wingitprod
I’m also here on odysee :grinning:

@malinformation
1 day ago
Uncle Pierce was pushing the message in the 90’s

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@Stan1
I agree. I have worked at met Young men who hate the current culture tyranny

Wibble
1 day ago
The promotion of excessive drinking
Emptying of churches
An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
Dependency on the state or state benefits
Control and dumbing down of media

Wibble
1 day ago
The Frankfurt School has 11 objectives to destroy society.
The creation of racism offences.
Continual change to create confusion
The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
Huge immigration to destroy identity.

@malinformation
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
Some myths or designed to demoralize you and moralize your enemies.

@SteveOfWessex
1 day ago
WP NNR o/

@DissidentThoughts
1 day ago

@123
if you select the right of wings name you can find his channel

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@Stan1
Thanks for your continued support.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow 𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐄𝐖 on Odysee

@NightNationReview

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Fairy tales are myths; myths have an inner truth, not a falsehood

Fearless sunshine
1 day ago
we should be so lucky

@Stan1
1 day ago
500
Joel’s spot on. There is a growing undercurrent in dissident counter-culture amongst many youngsters, driven by alt media circles. I’m actually rather hopeful for our youngsters. Great guest, great show.

Tony
1 day ago
o/ NNR

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
i wish

𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐄𝐖
1 day ago
they sure do

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@Carlota
The shit is hitting the fan

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@Carlota
I agree

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
14

@r.madden
1 day ago
Germans are weak, pathetic anti-White cucks, Poles are miles apart from them……..and us in England.

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
14s for Paul Edward Stevenson back on PWR

@MarkCollett

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@malinformation
The regime in America has been the same at least since Kennedy

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Yes it will all polarize

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Blair Cottrell:
Telegram:
https://t.me/realblaircottrell
Gab:
https://gab.com/RealBlairCottrell
Odysee:

@BlairCottrell

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Polish people are very intelligent and disciplined people like Germans

Tony
1 day ago
Polish police grabbed a GoyimTV guy yesterday

@r.madden
1 day ago
Poland is pretty based.

@malinformation
1 day ago

@TheThinRedLine
Regimes will change, we will need many of the regimes levers. We shouldn’t only build a parallel society, hide and wait; but also be actively in pursuit of wrestling back control of political power.

@r.madden
1 day ago
Liberals suck

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson
but not just everyone enemy but the MAIN enemy

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Mark Collett:
Telegram
https://t.me/markacollett
BitChute
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/IYXqC1BYZH31/
Gab
https://gab.com/markcollett
The Fall of Western Man
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
If you see downtown inner city Tokyo Japan streets they are incredibly safe and clean. Its like another planet.

@123
1 day ago
Your twitter?

@SteveOfWessex
1 day ago
H is the 8th letter in the alphabet HH

@123
1 day ago

@WingITprod
your website ser?

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson
agreed

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
I just wanna grill but they’re chopping little kids up

@WingITprod
1 day ago
support INDEPENDENT WHITE artists! like me :cowboy_hat_face:

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@TheThinRedLine
The current American regime is everyone’s enemy.

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
I saw a documentary on half black/Japanese people rising in Japan so the woke is coming for them also

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@malinformation
the current American regime is our main enemy

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@dinolegovich1964
Right next to the flying pyramids.

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
88 relates to David Lane’s 88 precepts from which the 14 words derive. It’s not HH

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
They have them in Wakanda !

@ReedJohnson

@malinformation
1 day ago
One way or another we need control of American assets, not let it fall into chaos. If we don’t our enemies will grab them.

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Mario Bros used to have a real life show back in the day

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@dinolegovich1964
Too bad. You’re white. No hoverboard for you!

Baxter
1 day ago
black little mermaid coming out soon

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@ArcadeFate65
yes

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
88 million?

ArcadeFate65
1 day ago

@TheThinRedLine
*Jewish power

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Japan has stayed strong as a last holdout to woke culture

@SteveOfWessex
1 day ago
88 HH

@dsallen7
1 day ago
Better than the first Super Mario movie for sure :rofl:

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@malinformation
Good question but the current American power has to be broken or loose it’s standing in the world

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
The Super Mario Bros. Movie (2023 film)
https://tinyurl.com/22jkz6y6

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Its for kids

withey
1 day ago

@Diogenes
works for me

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Important chat, this

Lost Bits
1 day ago

@dinolegovich1964
can see that in some way, they dont like too much free speech

@Diogenes
1 day ago
there are things to live for, like being racist on social media

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@LostBits
Scrubbing the net

@malinformation
1 day ago
Fall into what? Who gets the nukes and other military assets?

@TheThinRedLine

Baxter
1 day ago
the goal is to demoralize

@UltimateTruth
1 day ago
The 15-minute city agenda is worldwide

Lost Bits
1 day ago
they going to use AI to rewrite history even further

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Either that, Mark, or we carry on with comfort and money and voting for the Regime. They need to SUFFER

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
America has to fall first

@BritishGammon
1 day ago

@SerenaJB
That’s racist

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson
“progress’ is retardation socially. I want my hoverboard

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow SerenaJB on Twitter:
Tweets by SerenaJB3

@123
1 day ago
I think 60% still havn’t worked out they are being intentionally replaced.

@SerenaJB
1 day ago
If you’re called ‘racist’ you’re doing something right.

@hellopossums
1 day ago
Look at art, architecture and the beauty weve created often to remind ourselves what we’re fighting for

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
There is always a backlash

@BritishGammon
1 day ago
If people haven’t started questioning by now I don’t think they ever will.

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
The monied and the comfortable need to SUFFER

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@dinolegovich1964
Only in Back to the Future Part II

Baxter
1 day ago
people need to have more courage, more courage in the face of evil and not be afraid to be called racist

Fearless sunshine
1 day ago
it takes trannies to bring out the “conservatives”

@RoryHerbert
1 day ago
Good evening

@Stan1

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
Hoverboards ? Where are they ?

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Stan1 on Twitter
Tweets by s_stan1

Baxter
1 day ago
boomers are a big problem so scared of standing up for themselves

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
yes it all has to go

@Stan1
1 day ago
Out of the ashes

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
SMASH THE SYSTEM

@Stan1
1 day ago
Unfortunately yes

@IPF89
1 day ago
yup

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
It worked on me. I do not watch or listen to globohomo MSM

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
burn it all

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
YES

@Carlota
1 day ago
Baxter
Thanks

@SteveOfWessex
1 day ago
Yes

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
burn*

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
yup let it all brun

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@ScaredyCat
Thanks for your ongoing support.

@DissidentThoughts
1 day ago
Get out to nature, mainstream culture is pure trash

Baxter
1 day ago

@Carlota
28

ScaredyCat
1 day ago
$3.00
Hi,Mark: Bangladesh(MuslimCountry of 150million people inSubcontinent) justAnnounced payingRussia inChineseYuan 4 NuclearPlant. So guessing moreBangladeshis willGo 2 fellowAsianCountry China for univ’rstyStudies &professions, sinceBanglaGov’mnt willWant foreign ¥ currency, reducingUK borderPressure.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon on the left side of this page for a like!

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Bad retakes I may add

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@JellyTitschArse1066
I am sure he does

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
There are many remakes of classic movies because Hollywood has ran out of ideas

Tony
1 day ago
Joel reads Kerl Merks with Keet then ??

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
I can relate to Joel

Baxter
1 day ago
in canada we are being totally overrun with indians

@AustrianPainter
1 day ago
Damn Joel, what do you like?

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Five Guys is overpriced bourgeois and

Nationalisms
1 day ago
Beefburger cob for me

Baxter
1 day ago
entertainment is mostly trash boring and unspired these days

withey
1 day ago

@hellopossums
no it’s not, no nutrients and awful tasting

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

Tony
1 day ago
5 guys bacon triple is great

@nutsNdolts
1 day ago
i like checkers great chicken and spicy fries

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
^

@malinformation
1 day ago
Fresh-fries

Baxter
1 day ago
i have gone right off fast food

Chaz
1 day ago
they’re fries are good though

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Greasy local burger stand for me. truckers all the way

Mark Collett
1 day ago
Five Guys is INCREDIBLE!!!

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@TheThinRedLine
BiancaZombie is a great channel about comics

Chaz
1 day ago
5 guys is definitely overrated and overpriced

@hellopossums
1 day ago
mushrooms are one of the best things you can eat

@123
1 day ago
IT IS OVERRATED!

@Diogenes
1 day ago
Mark beat me to it

Baxter
1 day ago
joel davis and keith woods, 2 of best guys on dissident right

withey
1 day ago
we’ll get there joel at some point haha

Tony
1 day ago
o/

@DissidentThoughts

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
even games and comic books are getting woke so the young men will soon not have any option but to react

@BillAtheling
1 day ago
Dr Who was a positive male role model for young lads, someone who problem-solved, enjoyed high adventure and added a bit of mystery to the universe. They killed it.

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
5 guys

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
Are tere any good burgers ?

Italian Aura
1 day ago

@MarkCollett
Nature is the only real escape. You can’t make nature fake and gay.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@DissidentThoughts
Thanks for your contribution.

@DissidentThoughts
1 day ago
$5.00

@MarkCollett
Great guest tonight, would be great if you could get Southern Dingo on sometime

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@baxter
They are rewriting classics. Orwell called it

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
CoonMunity

Mike7666
1 day ago
LOL!!

@SerenaJB
1 day ago
Lol

@SteveOfWessex
1 day ago

@123
1 day ago
LMAO

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Joel Davis:
Twitter:
Tweets by joeldavisx
Telegram:
https://t.me/joeldavisx
YouTube:
https://tinyurl.com/ycy8b59b
Cozy:
https://cozy.tv/joeldavis
Odysee:

@joeldavis

Baxter
1 day ago
this is why i enjoy reading really old books

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
lol

@RoryHerbert
1 day ago
Dr Who and his reTardis !

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
We should start our own pubs: a gazebo and a crate will do it. Sell cans at £1.50. #BeerHallPutsch

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
The Resident Evil 2 remake doesn’t have a single black person. Japan doesn’t give a damn about woke culture

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@malinformation
:laughing:

@hellopossums
1 day ago
i avoid the real world

withey
1 day ago
going out is dangerous and occupied by non-whites, all of my mates moved away, this here is my community

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Join the Patriotic Alternative gaming group on Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticGamers

Baxter
1 day ago
cos the whole society is against White men

@malinformation
1 day ago
I cocoon and watch Mark Collett.

Bear With A Care
1 day ago
Tom Baker was Jewish (father side) – kinda obvious frmo his jewfro hair.

Mike7666
1 day ago
killing us slowly

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@baxter
Great Fim

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow British Gammon:
Twitter
Tweets by DesmondMakazi
Odysee

@BritishGammon

Chaz
1 day ago
how many men on British TV quiz shows have you seen say “I adore marvel films” and they’re a balding, chubby middle aged man?

Mike7666
1 day ago
that’s the point

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Well said Mark

Baxter
1 day ago
i watch master and commander to refresh

ChuckGerety
1 day ago

@dsallen7
2-3

@Carlota
1 day ago
What would anybody watch that? It’s literally disgusting

@BritishGammon
1 day ago
Spot on Mark

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
“Give them what they want”

@dsallen7
1 day ago
How many blacks do you think watch Doctor Who anyway? 5?

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
The new Doctor who will fail with the public

@hellopossums
1 day ago
They must love us so much they want to insert themselves into all our stories lol

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Our creativity is being hijacked

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
The Independent | Doctor Who reveals Sixties-set images of Ncuti Gatwa and Millie Gibson:
https://tinyurl.com/bdzeafrw

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
Mostly Peaceful Dr Who

Lost Bits
1 day ago
black adam and eve shocked me more

@VicTomised
1 day ago
Dr Who was Tom Baker. Period.

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
Will there be looting in Dr Who /

Tony
1 day ago
Tom Baker was better than this spear chucker

Baxter
1 day ago
they do it for a reaction mark

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Doctor Dindu

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@sparkofspirit
lol

@123
1 day ago
Dr gibs me dat

@SteveOfWessex
1 day ago
Dr poo

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
pimp

Baxter
1 day ago
thank God I dont fund tv

withey
1 day ago
disgusting

Rufus Page
1 day ago
Ike Turner

@DissidentThoughts
1 day ago

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Doctor Who Dat

Lost Bits
1 day ago
wait for it when do cast a black hitler

Earthling Carl 1
1 day ago
gross :vomiting:

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Looks like a dork

@BillAtheling
1 day ago
As my friend Joe Marsh said… Huggy Bear

Tony
1 day ago
wtf

Lost Bits
1 day ago
everything is cast as black now

Baxter
1 day ago
ugh

@DissidentThoughts
1 day ago
Went from timelord to gaylord

@hellopossums
1 day ago
imagine my surprise

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
I haven’t watched TV for over a decade. Is it true the sexual politics has degenerated beyond sick on Dr Who ?

@UltimateTruth
1 day ago
The Kalergi doctor

withey
1 day ago
it’s the silly end of sci-fi

@BillAtheling
1 day ago

@ourresidentbaker
:joy: :rofl: :joy:

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@charlesgerety
lol

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Dr Nike Shoe

@123
1 day ago
Dr Scholar

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Dr. Low IQ

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
Starsky and Hutch all over again

Earthling Carl 1
1 day ago
yet more demoralisation

The Resident Baker
1 day ago
The Daleks new call: “Misceginate, Misceginate!”

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

Baxter
1 day ago
pedro is such a desantis shill now

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Candace Owens is extremely overrated. She points out obvious hypocrisies that should be commonsense without the brainwashing

@DissidentThoughts
1 day ago

@Carlota
yes

The Resident Baker
1 day ago

@BillAtheling
Definitely! Do you remember the movies, with Peter Cushing as the Doctor?

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@Carlota
Unfortunately.

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@Carlota
good question

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@baxter
Thanks for your donation.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Support Bill Atheling’s work (C.P. Webster):
► The Horror Beneath:
https://tinyurl.com/je8vsr44
► Albion: ARVA – VALA – DEVA:
https://tinyurl.com/4sw9er7d

@AustrianPainter
1 day ago
I feel like Joel shits on everything.

ChuckGerety
1 day ago

@123
So true Man

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Doctor Spook?

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@withey
agreed

@123
1 day ago

@charlesgerety
correct, she is the based black lady, because Dems are the real racists.

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
nerds

@BillAtheling
1 day ago

@ourresidentbaker
yes, Peter Cushing, one of my favourite ‘horror’ actors… !

withey
1 day ago
dr who is crap

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Owens being a Black female gives her massive attention when she really isnt that dynamic of a thinker

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@Olivia
Thanks for your support.

Olivia
1 day ago
$14.00
Thank you Mark and Joel. New authentication system on entropy that is beyond me.

@123
1 day ago
the based black lady!!!!

Baxter
1 day ago
5
tucker will be lawfared to death without the fox news legal department to protect him

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@Diogenes
That’s unfortunate. :laughing:

@123
1 day ago
Tucker is great

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
I saw a video of Shapiro visiting Israel and getting a standing ovation and told he is a tremendous asset for Israel like a hero. We see where his true loyalties are

@BillAtheling
1 day ago
ah no… not Dr. Who… bring back Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker!

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Beer Hall Pooch on Twitter:
Tweets by BeerPooch

@AustrianPainter
1 day ago
Tucker isn’t going to be saying the 14 words live on TV, but he brings up subjects that those who are capable of coming on our side may after hearing his segments. Tucker is a net positive.

Lost Bits
1 day ago
got more than enough millions to start something own

Baxter
1 day ago
apparently bill oreilly makes 8 figures a year still

Tony
1 day ago
lol

@BeerHallPooch

@Diogenes
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson: he hasn’t returned my call LOL

@DissidentThoughts
1 day ago

@Carlota
we should be thankful the trans lot are so bat shit crazy

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
Great film. Great line.

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago

@JellyTitschArse1066
“Fk you, pay me!”

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
I agree with ‘content of character’. And Statistics

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Just by the content of character over color was MLK mantra. Leftist clearly do not follow that whatsoever now do they..

Baxter
1 day ago
fox news is so boring i just cant watch it…so many boomer takes

14Reasons
1 day ago
cucker was the last link to the Jewish msm. it’s good he’s gone

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@Diogenes
Haha. Wouldn’t that be interesting!

Baxter
1 day ago
its so tiresome

@Diogenes
1 day ago
Tucker can cohost PWR.

Tony
1 day ago
“it’s a Radical Agenda” drop from Tucker really made people think Tucker was more than a meme

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Long term, Tucker may be in a no-man’s-land as his personal worldview is ultimately untenable and unsustainable.

Fearless sunshine
1 day ago
Northern Virginia First !!!

Tony
1 day ago
Tucker should interview Cantwell

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Maybe Tucker and Lemon will do a “Tommy Boy” movie remake 2?

@DissidentThoughts
1 day ago
Imagine that

Tony
1 day ago
Maybe Tucker will join America First lol

@BlackwaterPark
1 day ago

@sparkofspirit
iirc he had an audience of like 3M. Online he’ll get 1/10 of that.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

Earthling Carl 1
1 day ago
most Boomers can’t be reasoned with, we just have to wait until they are no longer around

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Tucker must be aware of the deeper issues but knows he has to be careful in waking people up

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
I think the mainstream right in America to a large degree has already passed Tucker politically

Fearless sunshine
1 day ago
Conservative Log Cabin Republican sodomites.

@WhiteBull
1 day ago
an infiltrator is worse than an obvious enemy

@hellopossums
1 day ago
…or they’ll just go back to sleep

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
he still has reach. and what he does now will be something to see

@BlackwaterPark
1 day ago
Tucker said a lot of stuff that was useful to us. Him getting booted in an L for us.

@UltimateTruth
1 day ago
Murdoch got his media empire started via Rothschild finance

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
well it is good if fox goes under. tucker will be fine i bet.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
The official Patriotic Alternative website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk
Patriotic Alternative Official on Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticAlternativeOfficial
Join us at Patriotic Alternative:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/play-your-part

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Exactly. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good

Baxter
1 day ago
jessie waters lol

Tony
1 day ago
Tucker is Alex Jones tier

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Tucker is a good start in the red pill awakening but one should graduate from that

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Hey White man

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Tucker is good however he never goes into the real depth of the real deeper issues but he was the best of the mainstream

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
*too

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
BUt he mentioned Replacement Immigration to

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
That was brave of him

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@charlesgerety
yes that was good

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
I was impressed when Tucker spoke about Israeli immigration hypocrisy once

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@Justme
Where’s your game boy ?

Just Me
1 day ago
this is boring

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
I agree with Joel the best days of Tucker and fox are over

@bscreative
1 day ago
what happened, this show used to draw over 1k now its only 300

Tony
1 day ago
Tucker/Sowell realty co.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@Carlota
Indeed lol

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Tucker still thinks we can all live together if we just see eye to eye which is clearly a pipe dream. That thinking got us into this mess to begin with.

Fearless sunshine
1 day ago
Those who aren’t White Separatists are very forgettable.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
The ‘alternative’ TDW

@UltimateTruth
1 day ago
Murdoch is a massive Zionist

Earthling Carl 1
1 day ago
Murdoch and Tucker are both scum.

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
I hate a common shared fridge

@Diogenes
1 day ago
they always have a grossberg in the chamber

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
Did he eat someone’s sandwich ?

the woodlander
1 day ago

@TheThinRedLine
could force more our way

Tony
1 day ago
Tucker was never “based” , he’s a Bow tie Harvard swamp creature

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon on the left side of this page for a like!

Hullensian
1 day ago
CNN will probably hire him as a contributor like Spencer.

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
Tucker challenged the 9/11 narrative and mentioned Building 7 on a small channel recently. That is why he is gone

@nutsNdolts
1 day ago
you can never compromise enough with the mainstream right

Tony
1 day ago
Fox News are mostly libertarians & neocons

@hellopossums
1 day ago
cucked tuck

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Tucker said a lot of good things however I say he is still in the normie conservative league overall

@SteveOfWessex
1 day ago
^

Earthling Carl 1
1 day ago
he hates white identity and loves gays

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@Carlota
Not quite lol

the woodlander
1 day ago
its getting to the point where ANY disagreement with the nwo will not be tolerated.

withey
1 day ago
tucker and trump aren’t good enough

Tony
1 day ago
Conservative Catboys won’t get anywhere

Hullensian
1 day ago
Ann Coulter?

@hellopossums
1 day ago
ann coulter

Tony
1 day ago
F trump

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Boomer zombie trance sounds like a good band

CæsarsSun
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson
why wouldn’t anyone want to read that lol

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@TheThinRedLine
Good question. Time will tell.

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
Don’t put your Faith in the TV and talking heads

CæsarsSun
1 day ago
Have PA started memberships? Can non Brits join?

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
His daughter made it for him I heard.

@UltimateTruth

Fearless sunshine
1 day ago
Non are very forgettable.

Tony
1 day ago
Carlson heir to the Swanson microwave dinner fortune

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@Woodlader.4
scary but it might be good

@UltimateTruth
1 day ago
Why does Carlson wear a Kabbalah bracelet?

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
The pressure release valve exploded

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Joel Davis on Bio Link:
https://bio.link/joeldavis

@SteveOfWessex
1 day ago
Kabbalah bracelet Tucker

CæsarsSun
1 day ago
Tucker will get a new platform and hopefully will be more based

Earthling Carl 1
1 day ago
Tucker is CIA and was a regular at Comet Ping Pong, very slimy elitist swamp creature who hates White people collectivising to defend themselves. Not our guy.

@John_Connor
1 day ago
Anything that destabilises the Boomer zombie trance is a good time

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
cucker said a couple of good things. but for me you have to admit white genocide and name who is behind it. the jews. until then f ck em.

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Tucker was a mixed bag but maybe it is better that he is gone

Hullensian
1 day ago

@CæsarsSun
They often end up being both. Most people got here via civnats. I doubt very much that Tucker will be replaced by anyone more radical, more prone to speak of The Great Replacement.

Tony
1 day ago
Tucker cucked out

withey
1 day ago
politics and socio is far beyond tucker, so we needn’t care

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Jonathan Greenblatt Twitter | ‘It’s about time. For far too long, Tucker Carlson has used his primetime show..’
https://tinyurl.com/ysfbx9az

Tony
1 day ago
“I don’t even know you dude”

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@charlesgerety
true

CæsarsSun
1 day ago

@Hullensian
gatekeeper more like

Lost Bits
1 day ago
tucker for me was always controlled opposition, he was the voice for millions and made sure they keep seated

@Diogenes
1 day ago
alas for Cucker Trolleson

@hellopossums
1 day ago
I’m surprised tucker was there for so long

@John_Connor
1 day ago
Cucker getting fired is good, just breaks some more boomer programming, accelerate

Hullensian
1 day ago
Definitely a bad thing. He’s a gateway.

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
I saw a guy wearing a Baltimore Ravens hat and jersey today and all I could think is wow…what a idiot. That doesn’t matter for Gods sake!

CæsarsSun
1 day ago
Fk Tucker

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Fox News Media | Fox News Media and Tucker Carlson Part Ways:
https://tinyurl.com/2p9a2sps

Hullensian
1 day ago
Yeah, they literally referred to Germans as “swarthy”.

ChuckGerety
1 day ago

@dinolegovich1964
We are the Resistance to the system

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Please consider a small donation of $3. When everyone donates $3, it adds up!
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

The Resident Baker
1 day ago

@hellopossums
Because Jews.

@hellopossums
1 day ago
Why does everyone have the right to access to whites

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@charlesgerety
You must drink the cool aid and Party like You love it

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
o/

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Loyal allies the Australians

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
We just want to be left alone. Is that really so difficult for leftist to grasp my God.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Sven Longshanks website | How You Can Help:
https://www.radioalbion.com/2023/04/how-you-can-help.html

@John_Connor
1 day ago
While we are talking history why not mention that Britain didint want Australia to enshrine the White Australia Policy into the Constitution

Earthling Carl 1
1 day ago
Australia was literally building a White ethnostate before the “globalists” ruined it.

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Poor China isn’t being “Enriched” with Nigerians bumming around Bejing

@Glen19
1 day ago

@Tony
They aren’t Dravidians. they are a population before Dravidians.

@John_Connor
1 day ago
At the same time the media claims china is evil

Tony
1 day ago
they’re really Dravidian the Petrol huffers

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
If they want a better life by all means that’s their human right but don’t invade, attack and bash us in their pursuit of this

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
absolutely hail

Earthling Carl 1
1 day ago
Abos aren’t even human tbh

Mike7666
1 day ago
I have a Davis on my family tree

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson
The New York Every Single Times

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
yes who indeed ?

@hellopossums
1 day ago
everything gets back to wipe out whitey

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Who exactly is making these ‘rules’?

@RoryHerbert
1 day ago
Who invented the boomerang ?

Lost Bits
1 day ago
colonization was often positive

danzimmons
1 day ago
digeridoo

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

danzimmons
1 day ago
the diggeeidoo lol

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Hoof that petrol, Bung

Chaz
1 day ago
odysee already shitting the bed ten minutes in

ChuckGerety
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson
Yep and also the Easter Bunny is real

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@charlesgerety
Clearly lol

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon on the left side of this page for a like!

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
ello

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Well apparently West Africa Wakanda would be roaming the galaxy if not for those pesky Europeans

The Resident Baker
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
Good evening brother.

Lost Bits
1 day ago
had all the time and never build an autobahn

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
still living in the cave

@hellopossums
1 day ago
If they don’t get a yes vote they’ll keep going until they do

@dinolegovich1964
1 day ago
We have ghey ‘mirage’ in Australia. We are so progressive.

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
RFK vs Trump for pres is manna from heaven

@John_Connor
1 day ago
Technically no, they crossed the land bridge

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@Hullensian
good point

Hullensian
1 day ago
No one with a mainstream platform is ever worth defending. They’re just there to be bullied into being more and more radical.

@John_Connor
1 day ago
Will it be like gay marriage where the voting cards are mailed out

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@dsallen7
Thanks for your contribution.

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@BillAtheling
Good evening

The Resident Baker
1 day ago
The last stream Joel and Blair did, discussing the Jewish lobby in Australia, was excellent.

@hellopossums
1 day ago
it’s excellent

@John_Connor
1 day ago
They all died so Chinese can flood the country, clown world faux nationalism

jenkembonanza
1 day ago
I LOVE JOEL

withey
1 day ago
hail

@BillAtheling

@BillAtheling
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson
and hello sir

@DissidentThoughts
1 day ago
Its under attack by outsiders the same way St.Georges day is here

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@withey
good evening

@John_Connor
1 day ago
ANZAC day – The fake Nationalism day around veterans that died for the banksters

withey
1 day ago
hail

@TheThinRedLine

the woodlander
1 day ago

@withey
evening

withey
1 day ago
hail

@Woodlader.4

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
07

the woodlander
1 day ago

@TheThinRedLine
evening mate

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Joel is great

the woodlander
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
evening mate

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@Woodlader.4
My pleasure :thumbs_up:

@hellopossums
1 day ago
4am i mean

@John_Connor
1 day ago
4am

@RoryHerbert
1 day ago
Good evening folks.

@hellopossums
1 day ago
its 4pm actually

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Joel Davis:
Twitter:
Tweets by joeldavisx
Telegram:
https://t.me/joeldavisx
YouTube:
https://tinyurl.com/ycy8b59b
Cozy:
https://cozy.tv/joeldavis
Odysee:

@joeldavis

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Beer Hall Pooch on Twitter:
Tweets by BeerPooch

the woodlander
1 day ago
cheers reed

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Evening

@Woodlader.4

@BillAtheling
1 day ago
hail to Mark what a man

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Woody

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
who is really in power

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow The Woodlander:
Odysee

@Woodlader.4
Telegram
https://t.me/the_woodlander
YouTube
https://tinyurl.com/367pzrj4

the woodlander
1 day ago
evening everyone

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Support Bill Atheling’s work (C.P. Webster):
► The Horror Beneath:
https://tinyurl.com/je8vsr44
► Albion: ARVA – VALA – DEVA:
https://tinyurl.com/4sw9er7d

@EnglishRose
1 day ago
Hello

@BillAtheling
1 day ago
evening folks

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
The official Patriotic Alternative website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Email Mark Collett mark@thefallofwesternman.com

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
Both of them are not ideal

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
► Alternative players for this stream can be found at Radio Albion (Sven Longshanks):
https://www.radioalbion.com/2020/12/players.html

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Odysee donations: Click the ‘Support’ button or click the ‘$’ below the chat box

withey
1 day ago
hail

@0KT0BER

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

0KT0BER
1 day ago
evening withey

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Mark Collett:
Telegram
https://t.me/markacollett
BitChute
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/IYXqC1BYZH31/
Gab
https://gab.com/markcollett
The Fall of Western Man
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

withey
1 day ago
good evening everyone 28 14/88 wpww

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@SerenaJB
My pleasure

@SerenaJB
1 day ago
Thanks

@ReedJohnson
:thumbs_up:

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Chief Moody:
TikTok
https://www.tiktok.com/@chiefmoody
Telegram
https://t.me/chiefmoody
Odysee

@Chief_Moody

@SerenaJB
1 day ago

@JamesL
Hi James :slight_smile:

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
a great guest tonight

Tony
1 day ago
o/ Chief

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
all good

Chief Moody
1 day ago
Evening troops

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago

@TheThinRedLine
Good evening

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
evening

0KT0BER
1 day ago
evening all

ThinRedLine
1 day ago

@ReedJohnson
Good evening Brother

ChuckGerety
1 day ago
What up

ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Howdy Folks

Tony
1 day ago
Funny to see Joel next to “based” Tucker

JamesL
1 day ago
hey Serena

@hellopossums
1 day ago
Well done getting up so early for this Joel

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow SerenaJB on Twitter:
Tweets by SerenaJB3

@SerenaJB
1 day ago

@Trying2staywhitepilled
He likes the TRS guys too.

@SerenaJB
1 day ago
Great guest tonight.

Tony
1 day ago
o/ Heil

@Mut_zum_Wut
1 day ago
\o

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon on the left side of this page for a like!

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
Follow Saint Harrison:
Twitter
Tweets by SaintHarrison
Telegram
https://t.me/saintharrison
YouTube
https://tinyurl.com/2s4cuknh
Odysee

@SaintHarrison

@DissidentThoughts
1 day ago
Evening

Lost Bits
1 day ago
greetings!

Saint Harrison
1 day ago
Evening all

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
1 day ago
The official Patriotic Alternative website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk
Patriotic Alternative Official on Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticAlternativeOfficial
Join us at Patriotic Alternative:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/play-your-part

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Wait for the clarification. Until then, cut the concern trolling

Dairy Milk With A Glass Of Milk
1 day ago
really?

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Ask the guy who leaked the info to you -suspect in itself

Dairy Milk With A Glass Of Milk
1 day ago

@BeerHallPooch
is there anywhere I can learn more about the recent internal affairs? I have only been able to find “Chris PT”‘s upload of a “leaked internal broadcast” but iirc he has some rivalry or something? Don’t like drama just want to know what’s going on.

Dairy Milk With A Glass Of Milk
1 day ago
My enquiries gone again? Irritating considering I take the PA “side” of the issue, insofar as I know what it is! I would have liked to try asking again live tonight but cannot listen in. I hope the affair is covered in PA monthly anyway. Most concerned about the regional organisers/groups.

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Lot’s of new names tonight, bitching and concern trolling…

@betterdays
1 day ago
Neither TRS or AF are perfect, but AF has a higher ceiling if able to further radicalise their base, they flirt more with 1488ers year on year. TRS unironically truly are just a crowd of whining gen Xers.

太陽の騎士
1 day ago
Yeah, AF came up with that term because it’s only wiggers that don’t want to hang around gay Jews like Milo and gay… whatever Ali is. And gay catboys. The AF way!

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago
Memory serves, it was AF who conceived the term wignats for those not on their side? Let’s leave it at that.

Baxter
1 day ago
TRS swipe at the sidelines at AF, not interested.

Beer Hall Pooch
1 day ago

@baxter
PA has close and good relations with TRS/NJP.

@Trying2staywhitepilled
2 days ago
Joel has some of the hottest takes in the DR. Absolutely horrendous decision to go with AF over TRS guys, but oh well. Nobody is perfect.

jenkembonanza
2 days ago
Joel is awesome

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Mark Collett — It’s Okay To Be White — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Christmas Adverts – Multicultural Propaganda — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — What We Must Do To Win — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — Assad Didn’t Do It – Faked Syrian Gas Attack — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The Plot to Flood Europe with 200 Million Africans — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett — The jewish Question Explained in Four Minutes — TRANSCRIPT

Mark Collett at The Scandza Forum, Copenhagen – Oct 12, 2019 — Transcript

Patriotic Weekly Review – with Blair Cottrell – Dec 4, 2019 — TRANSCRIPT

Dangerfield – Talking Tough with Mark Collett – Mar 28, 2020 — Transcript

 

============================================

PDF Download

top

 

• Total words in post = 32,981
• Total words in transcript = 19,920
• Total images = xx
• Total A4 pages = xxx

Click to download a PDF of this post (x.x MB): (Available later)

 

Version History

top

Version 5:

Version 4:

Version 3:

Version 2:

Version 1: Thu, May 4, 2023 — Published post. Includes Odysee comments (1017).