Joel Davis: Okay, we should be live. It is the 4th of July, so if we’re in America, it would be Independence Day. But Obviously in Australia, 4th of July doesn’t mean anything. And interesting show for you tonight, I hope. Big show for you this evening, even though we are missing Blair. There’s a lot I wanted to break down, a lot I wanted to discuss. Blair’s sick, so I gave him the night off and decided to ride solo for this one.

 

So, yeah, you’re going to be getting two hours of me yapping, but presumably that’s what you’re all here for. So, sorry, I don’t have any Blair to kind of break it up. But it is what it is. The man’s sick. I think Mark Collett made him get out of bed early the 4 o’ clock in the morning or whatever for a Mark Collett stream the other day. And it kind of tipped him over the edge. It is winter down here in Australia and so he’s a bit under the weather.

 

But yeah, there’s a few big stories I wanted to touch tonight. The main thing I wanted to do, I’ve been doing a bit of a deep dive into Chinese politics lately and the last few days because there’s a lot of very interesting kind of subtle dynamics going on there. And it’s really interesting precisely because the timetable for potentially World War III kind of hinges upon Chinese politics. And that has massive implications for Australia, for America, for the world. So it’s hard to get good information and to kind of break through all the propaganda on both sides and figure out what’s happening because of the nature of the Chinese system. But I’ve done a considerable amount of reading and study.

 

And so I was going to set out my preliminary analysis this evening for all of you to kind of like red pill you on recent developments in China and what’s potentially happening and what to look for over the next few months as more signs will become evident as to what direction things are going at in Chinese politics where potentially, yeah, a lot hinges on kind of what happens over the next few months.

 

But before I get into that, there’s a few other stories. There’s a shocking story here in Australia with this, I think probably the most egregious child rape paedophile allegations I can remember in Australia. So there’s probably been something worse over the years, but I just don’t remember anything as bad as this. I pull this up here from The Noticer:

 

“Homosexual childcare worker charged with raping eight babies and toddlers. A homosexual child care worker has been charged with sexually abusing babies and toddlers at a child care centre in Point Cook, Melbourne. Alleged child rapist Joshua Dale Brown, 26, was arrested on May 12 and charged with 70 child sex offences against eight children aged between five months and two years old at Creative Gardens Early Learning centre, Point Cook between April 2022 and January 2023. The charges included sexual penetration of a child under 12, sexual assault, sexual activity in the presence of a child, possess child abuse material for use through a carriage service and possess child abuse material. Brown, who appeared with pink and blue dyed hair in a Facebook photo with his boyfriend during the same time period he worked at the Point Cook centre, had no criminal record and had a valid working with children check. It has since been cancelled.”

 

“Victoria police said on Tuesday they are now investigating whether there are more victims as Brown worked at 20 child care centres around Melbourne between January 2017 and May 2025 and are examining evidence of an allegation at a second centre at Essendon. The alleged child sex predator appears in a photo at that centre shared on its Facebook page on March 21st for so-called Harmony Day with the caption, quote, ‘today we recognise Australia’s cultural diversity’. Brown also tested positive for a sexually transmitted disease and authorities have contacted the families of 1200 children who attended the same child care centres to urge them to get tested. The alleged paedophile first appeared in court in May, but a suppression order issued by Magistrate Michael White and applied for by police and the Office of Public Prosecutions meant the case could not be made public at the time.”

 

“But as the investigation has developed in scale, the need to notify more than 2, 600 families as a precaution became apparent. Suppression order was therefore revoked and police announced the charges and made the unusual decision to release the alleged child rapist name.”

 

Yeah, anyway, you can go read the whole thing on Noticer. I mean I read most of it, but I mean horrific! And look at, he’s gone to so many different child care centres. He’s flip-flopping around doing days at all these different child care centres.

 

And so now thousands of parents have to get their children tested for STDs. This is beyond fucked up! Like it’s actually like it’s hard to even believe this is even real from my point of view. Like it’s hard to, I mean I’m not denying that it’s real. It’s obviously real, but it’s hard to fathom. It’s hard to come to terms with that this is real, this is happening. And there’s a lot of obvious things that one could say about this. Right? You know, I’ve heard calls for:

 

“Oh, we need to ban men from working in child care centres!”

 

Probably not the most unreasonable thing in the world, but, like, wouldn’t that break, like, discrimination laws? The kind of contradictions of the system are kind of being shown up there. You know, obviously gay dudes, highly disproportionately paedophiles. That discussion has been opening up.

 

[06:20]

 

But I think the real discussions that are important here and that are pertinent here, are these. Number one, nobody in Australian politics with any kind of power or influence, no major political party is calling for the death penalty. This guy is raping kids. Some of them haven’t even turned one. This guy is raping children that young in a systematic, predatory way and filming it. He needs to die! Like, I don’t. Who’s going to come and debate me on this subject? Who’s going to offer the counter argument, no, we need to keep this guy alive. For what reason?

 

Pedophiles need to be executed. But particularly it’s a case like this. I mean it’s. How is it even, … Why the fuck did we get rid of the death penalty? And it’s just putrid that we have to breathe the same air that this scum breathes. It’s unacceptable. It’s an insult to the honour of our nation that someone can commit crimes like this against our children and stay alive. He needs to die! He needs to be put to death. Obviously the system won’t do that. And I’m seeing barely anyone call for this.

 

When we launch our political party. This is going to be one of key items on our platform. I think this is a message, a national conversation that we need to have. I think pretty much everyone in Australia agrees we need to put child rapists to death.

 

So that’s going to be one of the key issues I think that we’re going to attack, because we just need a far more serious response.

 

I mean, there’s too many cases. I mean, this person hasn’t been caught before, but there’s been too many cases of child rapists that have gone to jail, served short jail sentences, where they get held in protective custody so the other prisoners don’t kill them, released back into the community and then reoffend.

 

I mean, how is this even happening? How are we ever releasing someone who is a child rapist back onto the street ever! Like that’s just insane! That’s insane! It begs the question, the people making these decisions, why are they so lenient? Is it because they themselves are engaging in this kind of behaviour? Why are politicians not doing anything about this? Is it because they themselves are engaging in this kind of behaviour? It really does beg the question. Why else would you try to protect paedophiles unless you are one yourself, or you’re working with them in some systematic way or somethings surely this is something that we can all agree on. Left-wing, Right-wing. It’s just disgusting!

 

I mean, second thing that I also would like to say about this is another key policy that we’re going to be putting forward in this country. We have the child care rebate. Now I’ll look into this. Actually, I’ll look it up right now. How much is the average child care rebate a year for working mothers in Australia? Looking it up right now. So there’s child care studies, subsidies.

 

So the child care subsidy percentage decreases as family income increases. For instance, families earning up to 80,000 may receive up to a 90% subsidy, while those earning above $530,000 a year are not eligible. So what it’s saying here is, basically if you earning like an average wage, the government basically pays for your kid to go to childcare. If you’ve got children under school age. Why are we paying? Like if the mother of the child literally can’t afford to pay for child care, why are we subsidizing that? Why don’t instead of paying mothers to dump their kids at like random child care centres run by foreigners infested with paedophiles so they can get raped? How about instead of that, we pay that money to mothers to stay home and take care of their own children.

 

In society today you can be moralistic about it. Mothers should be taking care of their own children. And I agree with that. But obviously economically it’s quite difficult today to have stay at home mothers. You know, it’s difficult to raise a family on one income and for many reasons related to cost of living.

 

So what’s the number one thing that we could do if we want to increase the birth rate and protect children, pay mothers to stay home! I think that’d be an incredibly popular policy. Popular with women and with men. Right? Most men would like their missus to stay home and take care of the house and take care of the kids. The state should pay. That’s a social good. The state should pay for it. Taxpayers, I’d rather pay my taxes so that White mothers can stay at home raising White babies, then paying child care subsidies so they can go and work and send their kid off to some like, paedophile rape centre. So we can protect the kids. We can get the mothers back in the homes so the kids are raised properly. People will have more children because women, won’t be as busy with their careers. They’ll be able to have more children, feel more comfortable to have more children, be incentivised to have more children because they’ll probably get bigger payments the more children they have.

 

And then we won’t need immigration anymore to expand the population. I mean, it’s just a beautiful policy. Everyone wins. It’d be an expensive policy, but we’ve got like 15% of the country on NDIS, the disability insurance scheme. Most of them are rorting it. Most of them are capable of working and just have like a diagnosis, like a bullshit, like psychology diagnosis to allow them to just grift off the system. Got all these like immigrants that come here from the Middle East and just sit on Centerlink grift off that. So many people are grifting off this system. If we shut down all those grifts and redirected that money to young White mothers to have White babies. I’d much rather they be the ones grifting. I’d much rather reproduction be the grift. A lot of people say:

 

“Oh, how are you going to get women to vote for Nazis? How are you going to get women to vote for nationalism?”

 

I think this is a pretty fucking good policy that we can get their votes on, but men as well. We want to be able to bring back the Australian dream, raising a family on one income.

 

[12:56]

 

So I think this issue here really just illustrates how great policies like this just don’t exist in the political system. Like, no one’s really interested in trying to fix the major social problems of our time that have very simple solutions that no one talks about, no one thinks of, that would be 90% of the country behind you, popular. So I think we can really do some damage in a political system like this, presenting these kinds of ideas to the people.

 

I think a lot of people are going to be very pleasantly surprised:

 

“How come the Nazis have such good policies? What the fuck!”

 

And yeah, we can hopefully move the debate onto our terms. And yeah, but I mean, just disgusting the story. I mean, what else can you say about it? We just got to kill this fucker. We’re not advocating for to do anything illegal, but he needs to be legally executed, anyway.

 

Another I’m not going to go into another issue. I’m going to focus on this China thing because there’s a lot to unpack.

 

So basically what I’ve been looking into lately is there’s been a lot of rumours swirling that President Xi Jinping in China is, his power is being curtailed, basically. That his grip on power is significantly slipping, that other elements within the Chinese Communist Party are reasserting themselves. And there’s many reasons why people are suspecting this. And I heard this at first months ago and I suspected it was Western propaganda and the type of thing you hear all the time:

 

“Oh, Vladimir Putin is going to drop dead, he has cancer, he’ll die within six months!”

 

Or you hear these kinds of stories all the time, but very rarely does anything materialise. So I didn’t really look into it too much because I kind of dismissed it as typical Western propaganda. But after taking a serious look at what these people are saying, I think that are calling this out, it does seem that there’s no smoke without fire on this. It does seem like there’s something to there’s been a whole series of purges of high ranking members of the PLA, the Chinese military, of generals appointed by Xi, that was, Xi loyalists that have been taken out, whether they’ve died, been in prison, disappeared from public life, been forced to step down, what have you. A very large amount of these things have occurred.

 

There’s been more critique on Xi’s policies in Chinese major publications, particularly his policy on Taiwan, but also his economic policies. And yeah, the Chinese economy isn’t doing so well. They’re hurdling towards potentially a major war with the United States over Taiwan. If they play that situation in a particular way.

 

And so it would make sense actually that certain elements within the party would maybe try to assert themselves at this time. Apparently rumours were, because basically the way that the Chinese system works, every five years you have, they have like a big, you know, general meeting, like conference where all the members of the party come together and like all the senior members of the party and like vote on the direction of the party and so on. And the last time this happened was in 2022.

 

And I remember at the time it was significant because the previous president, Hu Jintao, was kind of publicly disgraced. Xi kind of ceremonially in front of all the cameras, had him kind of like marched out of the meeting. And he represents like the Communist Youth League faction, which is a faction of more moderate elements within the Chinese Communist Party. Xi’s faction is more nationalistic and militaristic and authoritarian, whereas this other faction is more liberal in the sense that obviously they’re still communists and they’re still like technically and they still support like a one party state, but they support more economic liberalisation, more capitalism, more opening of China to foreign markets, a better kind of better relationship with the United States, a less hostile relationship with the United States, and they want to maintain more kind of stability and diplomacy for foreign policy, economic policy, etc. And Xi kind of won out against them.

 

And then over the years since he became president has made a series of moves to essentially like stack the party with loyalists to him and to his agenda and kind of sideline all these other factions. And leaders of these old factions often get referred to as the so-called party elders now because they once held the highest positions in the party and are very famous in China. And you know, they’ve made note kind of in subtle ways, they don’t explicitly criticise the party or Xi, but in subtle ways they make it known that they don’t approve of Xi’s militarism towards Taiwan and kind of more aggressive and assertive foreign policy.

 

[18:45]

 

But what’s interesting is that at the, as I said, every five years they have a big meeting and then they have what they call plenary sessions, which are their like major meetings that they have once every year or like less than every year, maybe every 10 months or so, roughly speaking, I can’t remember exactly. And it’s kind of like the leaders of the party get together and decide what the direction of the party is going to be.

 

At the most recent of these meetings last year, there were all these rumours that he was sick. There wasn’t very much footage put out by Chinese State media of him really doing anything at the meeting or presiding over much. And it was presented that these party elders, so to speak, that Xi had sidelined were now involved and were talking at the meeting and were, and it was kind of spun:

 

“Oh, Xi is trying to show unity by being graceful and allowing his old fashioned rivals to come and participate in the plenary session.”

 

But in retrospect that seems like a cope, because ever since that plenary session, Xi’s public role has greatly diminished. Recently they just had like a BRICS meeting. He didn’t even go. And there’s been several big events and big meetings where he hasn’t really attended. Many are speculating he has health issues, which is probably part of that.

 

But let’s say he does have health issues. He has no obvious successor. It would make sense that that would undermine him, people’s confidence in him and his agenda. Because if he’s gonna drop dead or become too sick to be president, then the obvious question of, well, who’s going to take over from him comes into play. And it seems like elements within the elite, even though many of them were allies of Xi at one time or another, many of them have turned against him.

 

One of these, according to rumours, top military figures that have turned against him is General Zhang Yuga, which is basically the most senior kind of military figure in China. You know, basically only Xi really outranks him in military matters. He is the Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission.

 

And basically it’s the guy that’s like running the military. He’s kind of getting on a bit. He’s getting old. I think he’s in his 70s, and he was kind of in line to be potentially replaced by generals that were installed by Xi below him. And I can’t remember all the Chinese names. I’m not going to like list off all the names, but basically those guys that were kind of earmarked to kind of succeed him, and everyone was expecting to succeed him, have recently been purged. They’re Xi loyalists, which has kind of been shocking news, and many other high ranking officials across the military.

 

Meanwhile, Zhang Yuga in his public statements on Taiwan is a very different line to Xi. I can break this down a little bit. Xi’s vision on Taiwan, which is kind of nuanced and complex. So since Xi has come to power, his rhetoric on Taiwan has become progressively more and more aggressive. It kind of peaked just before Covid then it kind of let off a little bit, and then once Covid was over, it’s been even more aggressive.

 

So Taiwan, for those who don’t know, according to the official position of the Taiwanese government and the official position of the Chinese government, Taiwan is not a separate country. Taiwan is a part of China, and it simply has a different government.

 

And this is a layover from after the Second World War. You had an alliance between the old Nationalist government and the Communists, where they ceased their civil war and made an alliance to fight the Japanese in World War II. After the Japanese were defeated, they went back to fighting each other. The Communists won. Mao Zedong took over China, established Communist China. And the Nationalists were essentially chased off the mainland onto the island of Taiwan in 1949 or whatever.

 

And at first, the Americans backed the Nationalists against the Communists. This is the beginning of the Cold War, as you might expect. There was even, like General MacArthur, I believe, proposed that the United States should nuke China to try and like, nip Communism in the bud, which probably would have been the right move in retrospect. It was chosen against. There was obviously the Korean War with the Chinese kind of helped North Koreans fight against South Koreans, which were backed by the United States and us and other Western powers.

 

And so there’s a lot of tension there. And there was a view that the Nationalists could maybe somehow get a foothold back in the mainland and take the mainland back from the Communists. And the Americans backed the Chinese government in absentia that basically had formed in Taiwan, that still had ambitions to go and take Beijing back and take China back.

 

But of course, that never materialised. And this was a kind of quasi fascistic, nationalist authoritarian regime that was running Taiwan, but backed by the United States.

 

Fast forward to the 70s when it became clear that the Nationalists were never going to take China back, and the Communist Party had kind of consolidated power. Then President Nixon and his Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, they normalised relations with China and they agreed, because basically they wanted to, during the Cold War, they wanted to basically drive a rift deeper between China and Russia or China and the Soviet Union. They noticed that the Soviet Union and China, even though they were both communist states, they didn’t see eye to eye on a lot of issues. Mao in particular, was very upset after Stalin died. Khrushchev took over the Soviet Union, put out the secret speech basically condemning Stalinism as excessively totalitarian and brutal and so on. He saw this as a betrayal of Communism and of the revolution. Mao, that is, and kind of viewed the Soviets as moderates, as kind of moderates who were infected with bourgeois sensibilities or whatever. And there was territorial disputes between the Chinese and the Soviet Union.

 

[25:31]

 

And so even though they were both communist states that were aligned in many ways, they didn’t see eye to eye. And the Americans saw this as an opportunity to go in there, make a deal with China, make an economic deal with China to normalise relations somewhat, get China hooked on trade with the United States, and therefore neutralise them to isolate the Soviet Union strategically. Obviously this was an effective strategy. The Cold War was over with less than two decades later, the Soviet Union collapsed.

 

But the United States never went back to re-isolating China or didn’t perpetuate the Cold War. Even though the communists were still in power in China. The Americans declared the Cold War was over, Communism was defeated, liberalism had won.

 

And then they adopted a policy of liberal internationalism, a policy that basically, if we just integrate the countries of the world into enough international institutions that are quote, unquote, “liberal” and integrate everyone’s economies with one another through the globalisation of international trade, and we had globalised culture and everyone gets kind of draughted into this Pax Americana-Judeo, global slop of the post Cold War, you know, Pax Americana, international order. The elites of every country in the world will develop so many business relationships and diplomatic relationships and so on with the elites of all the other countries in the world, mediated by America and the West. But they’re all basically just copy and paste liberal democracy into their societies, engage in liberal, democratic reforms. Everyone will become a liberal democracy, and they’ll all sit together at the UN and shake hands and we won’t have any major World Wars anymore. And everyone’s economies will become so interdependent with one another that they won’t want to go to war because their economies aren’t sufficiently isolated that they could take each other on.

 

Instead, they’re so dependent upon trade with other countries that they work out their problems diplomatically and we all sing Kumbaya and everyone’s like a liberal forever. And there’s no more wars and there’s no more evil dictators. And this is the bullshit vision that was put forward.

 

And so even though China was still a communist authoritarian state, the idea was:

 

“Well, if we just let China, we just pretend that the Chinese are cool and allow them to participate in all international liberalism and globalism, then eventually the Chinese elite will adopt liberal ideas and engage in liberal reforms and China will liberalise over time, and we won’t have to fight China and force them to kind of succumb to liberalism. They’ll do it organically.”

 

This was the theory. And it seemed to be kind of working for a time because the Chinese leadership did get progressively more liberal. Every new leader that came in was less and less authoritarian, less and less radical in terms of their Marxist beliefs, more and more open to economic liberalism, opening up Chinese markets. They didn’t, you know, create Democratic, liberal, democratic reforms, but they were more liberal on economics and they were more open on diplomacy. They weren’t very aggressive in asserting their interests on the world stage.

 

And so the Chinese were not viewed as a major threat. And the idea was that if we just make the Chinese and American economies so integrated and dependent upon one another that China relies upon selling cheap crap to the United States and America relies upon buying all these key items from China, this will create a kind of natural friendship and alliance that prevent the two states from going to war.

 

Then along comes the rise of President Xi in the early 2010s, early to mid 2010s. And Xi is a nationalist, Xi is an authoritarian and he had more aggressive views for China’s potential. For Xi the Chinese are the centre of the world. The Chinese traditionally and there’s some truth to this. For a lot of human history, China was the biggest and wealthiest empire on the planet. You know, the Chinese empires existed for literally like five millennia or something in various forms. They’re an ancient people, an ancient civilisation, and there’s 1.4 billion of them.

 

Imagine if all of Europe was integrated into one big like super state. That’s basically what China is in terms of its size and its complexity. And the view was:

 

“Well we’ve become so rich now through all of this economic development that we’ve done that we can invest that money in developing a modern military outfit that can compete with the United States and we can assert ourselves and the United States is falling. The United States has declining internal legitimacy, all these internal problems. We can rise and challenge the American led liberal international order with an assert a different way. And we can assert Chinese interests and try to dominate the Asian region and become the most powerful country in the world and kind of replace the United States as the top dog.”

 

And key to that is taking Taiwan.

 

So why is Taiwan key to it? Well, number one, it’s kind of like a disgrace to China that Taiwan, which they consider to be part of China, is being run by a now liberal democracy.

 

So after the Cold War ended, Taiwan shifted from being a one party authoritarian nationalist state to being a liberal democracy.

 

And so the Kuomintang, the old nationalists that used to run China and that pushed into Taiwan and were running Taiwan under Chiang Kai-shek* and so on, they now had to win an election of the Taiwanese people to hold on to government.

 

[* Chiang Kai-shek-Chinese politician, military leader, and President of Taiwan from 1950 to 1975 (1887–1975) Chiang Kai-shek was a Chinese politician, revolutionary, and general who led the Republic of China from 1928 until his death in 1975. His government was based in mainland China until it was defeated in the Chinese Civil War by the Chinese Communist Party in 1949, after which he continued to lead the Republic of China on the island of Taiwan. Chiang served as leader of the Nationalist Kuomintang party and the commander-in-chief of the National Revolutionary Army from 1926 until his death, during which he was known as Generalissimo. Wikipedia.]

 

[31:58]

 

And by the time you get to the 2000s, they start losing and you get the rise of the Democratic People’s Party or whatever it is, which is basically the Taiwanese libtards. Taiwanese Leftists who advocate for bringing in immigrants into Taiwan, who advocate for gay marriage, who advocate for basically trying to join the West and adopt Western so-called Western, basically like American libtard values.

 

And also each generation that is born in Taiwan, if you look at the polling, they consider themselves Taiwanese more and more and Chinese less and less.

 

So when they started doing polling on this back in the 1990s, the vast majority of the people of Taiwan when they asked them what’s your ethnicity? They said “I’m Chinese”. Now the vast majority of Taiwanese people in particularly young people say “we’re Taiwanese, I’m not Chinese”. And a minority identifies as Chinese.

 

So the Taiwanese have begun to see themselves as a distinct people. They identify with liberal, democratic, so-called western values. And yeah, they keep getting voted back in these Taiwanese libtards. And the Kuomintang who’s like, I guess the Taiwanese Right-wing conservative like Boomer Party, they say:

 

“Let’s not upset China. Like yes, like one day there is only one China and yes, one day we’ll reunify.”

 

But they tried to kind of maintain this perpetual status quo instead the Taiwanese libtards that are in power basically kind of pushing the envelope and getting more, not outright stating like full on Taiwanese independence, but basically almost saying that. And this is a big deal.

 

Like pretty much no country in the world recognises Taiwan as an independent state. Like technically on paper. America doesn’t, Australia doesn’t. Almost no one does because the Chinese have, in order to normalise relations with them, they insist that you have to, you can’t accept Taiwan is a legitimate state. They don’t have a seat at the UN. There are so they’re in a very interesting weird position.

 

And the leaders before Xi, when he took power were kind of conciliatory towards Taiwan. Like:

 

“Yes, as long as Taiwan accepts that there’s only one China and they don’t assert their independence, we’re chill with that. And one day we hope that we can peacefully reunify into like one political system.”

 

But they weren’t really pressing the issue. In the 1990s I believe there was a dispute under the Clinton administration era there was a dispute between China and Taiwan over like I think it was when the Taiwanese held their first Democratic election. I think that the Chinese didn’t appreciate that they preferred the Kuomintang to be in power because I guess they correctly assessed that the Kuomintang was going to be more pro-Beijing than what would come out of democracy, which is a more Westernised, anti-Chinese version of Taiwan. And anyway, strongly opposed the whole election procedure, I think it was in like 1996 or something.

 

And the way that Clinton responded as President of the United States was just to send some carrier strike groups through the Taiwanese straight and say:

 

“What are you going to do?”

 

Basically. At that time, China was so militarily weak compared to the United States that they just had to cuck out and just kind of watch the United States flex on them like that. The elections went ahead and Taiwan became a democracy.

 

Cycle forward to today and China’s way more powerful than it was back then they have invested a lot obviously in building up their navy, their air force, rocket tech, etc. They’re not at the level of the United States, but they’ve closed the gap in a very big way.

 

And after Covid, I remember 2022, I think I remember like Nancy Pelosi, she went to go and visit Taiwan and this caused a big stir because she was like Speaker of the House, so she was like third in line for the American leadership at the time, below the Vice President. And she flew to Taiwan to do a visit and she was the highest Ranking, I think US official to visit Taiwan in like 25 years since the events I just described, I think basically. And the Chinese freaked out and started doing all these military drills and shooting rockets over Taiwan and flying fighter jets all over Taiwan and practicing like invading Taiwan and stuff, doing like live drills with their navy and this kind of thing. Obviously with the intent of, basically freaking the Taiwanese out, saying “don’t take any steps towards independence, like you’re ours, bitch” kind of thing.

 

And Xi, in his public statements on Taiwan or official statements on Taiwan when he first came to power, there were a lot more tame. There was an assertion that Taiwan would be reunified with China.

 

But as time went on into the late 2010s and the 2020s, Xi statements have become more forceful, saying basically that option that we’d like to do it peacefully, but there’s other options on the table. If Taiwan makes a move towards independence, will invade, basically.

 

And anyway, this is a big deal because a war, an invasion of Taiwan isn’t just an invasion of Taiwan. The United States is basically committed to protecting Taiwan. And the reason why they’re committed to protecting Taiwan isn’t just to fuck with China or because they care about Taiwanese democracy, or something. It’s strategic.

 

Basically, if you look at the geography of East Asia, where Taiwan is very key strategic real estate. Because basically all the shipping lanes that connect Japan and South Korea through Southeast Asia, to the Middle East and to Europe all go past Taiwan. If China controls Taiwan, they’re able essentially to more effectively navally blockade Japan and Korea.

 

[38:31]

 

Now, that’s significant because Japan and Korea are highly dependent upon imports by sea. Korea only has a land border with one country, North Korea, which then is connected to Russia and China. So they need access to the sea to have access to the rest of the world, basically outside of Chinese control or North Korean control, which are probably even worse from their perspective.

 

Japan has no land borders with anyone. They have to trade by sea. And Japan doesn’t have natural resources in any substantial number. Japan is utterly dependent upon importing natural resources, even importing food. I believe. They don’t actually have enough agriculture to sustain their population. There’s like 120 million people on that island. They can’t feed them unless they can get ships in and out.

 

Basically, they’re highly dependent upon international trade. So if the Chinese were to navally blockade Japan or Korea, it could bring either of these states to their knees very quickly. They could cause famines. They could completely collapse their economies.

 

So if the United States doesn’t guarantee their security, basically they would be forced to cuck to China. They would be forced to sign a whole bunch of agreements subordinating themselves to China. And that would enable China to become a hegemon over East Asia. They’d have other political and military control over East Asia.

 

And that has massive ramifications, because that would mean Australia’s position becomes precarious. All the other countries in Southeast Asia becomes precarious. A lot of them, the Philippines, Vietnam, a lot of these states would be like a cascade effect. America would lose its ability to have bases. Right now, I think the Americans have like 50,000 personnel or something stationed in South Korea. They’ve still got bases there from the Korean War that they maintain. They’ve got obviously an alliance with Japan. Japan’s the most powerful country in East Asia that America is aligned with. If they lose Korea and Japan, their whole strategic position relative to China collapses.

 

And then all these other states, like I said, would then lose confidence in the United States to defend them. They would also then cuck to China. Maybe even Australia would cuck to China at that point, because there would be this cascade effect. China would become a regional hegemon. China would grow in global prestige. China would then be able to start projecting power beyond East Asia into the rest of the world. It would be a massive shift in global power dynamics.

 

So Taiwan is one little island of like 25 million people, right? It seems insignificant, but it’s not. Because from the Japanese and the Korean perspective, if America is not willing to defend Taiwan, they’re going to lose confidence that they’ll defend them and so on, right? The dominoes go from there.

 

So the United States has to project power in the region. It has to say:

 

“No, these are our regional partners. We will fight to defend them.”

 

Because that’s what holds together the network of alliances that keeps China kind of like locked in, where all the, these island countries and Southeast Asian countries that encircle China, whether it be the Philippines, Vietnam, you know, Indonesia even, and so on, Australia, this whole chain of countries, them all being aligned with the United States, locks China out, basically. They can’t build military bases on their territories. They can’t flex over them diplomatically, politically, and so on and force them to do whatever they want because they’re the big dog. Well, the United States and the Americas can do that they can flex on Canada, they can flex on Mexico, they can flex on all the countries around them because they’re just so much more dominant and powerful. Who’s going to come and defend Mexico against the United States? Who’s going to come and defend Canada against the United States? No one.

 

So America is able to throw its weight around. That’s how China would be able to kind of behave under these kinds of circumstances.

 

Basically, yeah, there’s a whole other series of technical advantages to Taiwan. China doesn’t have, like a deep drop into the Pacific Ocean. So there’s kind of like a, … The Pacific Ocean is very deep, right, like most big oceans are.

 

But as you get closer to China, the undersea kind of ground level, whatever you call that, it raises quite significantly. So when China drop a submarine off the coast of China, it can be detected, because of the [low] depth, by sensors.

 

However, if you drop a submarine off Taiwan, you get this radical kind of cliff drop basically on the eastern side of Taiwan straight into the Pacific Ocean. So in theory, Chinese nuclear subs could, if they control Taiwan, could be dropped off the east coast of Taiwan into the Pacific Ocean and be undetectable to the United States. Meaning the Chinese could sail nuclear subs all the way to the other side of the Pacific without the United States detecting them, because they could sail them at like maximum depth the whole way. That’s pretty serious because they got nuclear subs that would provide first strike capabilities or counter strike capabilities, or whatever, in the event of a nuclear exchange.

 

So there’s a lot of key, like strategic dynamics at play over who controls Taiwan.

 

Also, from the United States perspective, if China was to move on Taiwan, they would be upsetting the regional balance of power, like I said. It would give the Americans an excuse to go to war with China. Because now they’re saying:

 

“We’re just defending Taiwan, we’re defending our allies, right?”

 

And because China would anticipate that, they would probably actually attack Japan, Korea, other states at the same time they attack Taiwan, potentially under certain kind of like war game scenarios, it’s projected.

 

[45:50]

 

So the United States, the argument goes, maybe it’s in their interest to fight China now because if you leave it 100 years or 50 years China could keep developing, developing, developing, developing, and become so militarily powerful that they’re harder to beat 50 years down the track than they are now.

 

So the idea is you kind of bitch slap them now, put them back in their place, because a war with China over Taiwan is far preferable to a war with China somewhere closer to the United States, or a war with China after they’ve already got Japan and Korea and these other states on their side and consolidated power and have grown stronger. And now maybe they’re getting involved in South American politics or they’re getting involved in European politics or Middle Eastern politics or something, and you’re fighting China in another part of the world.

 

The advantage for the Americans of fighting them over Taiwan is that it’s right in China. Basically, it’s right off the coast of China. America can send all their navy, air force, whatever, and just blow up as much in China as they possibly can.

 

And at the same time, they can navally blockade China in Southeast Asia. China is also utterly dependent on international shipping that goes through Southeast Asia to connect it to the Middle East and to Europe. China doesn’t have enough natural resources, resources to sustain itself. It doesn’t even have enough food to sustain itself. It needs to import a lot of stuff. Also, its economy is entirely built around exports.

 

So the US strategy, they don’t necessarily even have to defend the island of Taiwan successfully. They can just blow up a bunch of shit in China, try and blow up as much of China’s military hardware as possible, and then set up a blockade in Southeast Asia that stops China from basically being connected to the rest of the world through shipping, and then wait and watch as China internally kind of destabilises. And win the war that way. That would probably be their strategy.

 

So, however, if you allow China to kind of develop and all these Southeast Asian countries to become allies of China because you didn’t fight them over Taiwan, setting up that naval blockade becomes way more difficult because maybe all those states are now Chinese allies and they’re going to be enemies of the United States. They’re going to allow the Chinese to build naval installations. They’re not going to allow the Americans to bring their navy into their region or whatever.

 

So, yeah, international politics is a confidence game. If all these states have confidence in American power, they’ll back it. If they’ll cuck to China. That’s how it works. So Taiwan is just like this first domino in this chain effect of strategic ramifications.

 

Now, this is significant because ultimately the ball is in China’s court. The United States can’t force China to invade Taiwan. Maybe they could try and convince the Taiwanese to do something suicidal, like declare independence or something and really provoke it, but they can’t ultimately decide what China does. China decides what China does.

 

Now, Xi Jinping, in his kind of aggressive foreign policy, has only really been kind of pushing Taiwan away, making Taiwan fear invasion seem inevitable, getting the Americans to basically see invasion as potentially on the horizon, prepare for a war with China. Trump’s foreign policy is a large aspect of it is really geared towards containing China, like the tariff policies and so on. There’s people in the Trump administration, like Elbridge Colby, I think his name is, and others who are national security advisors who are just like China hawks, who just say that basically everything should be focused on containing China. Fuck Russia, fuck the Middle East, we should just make peace deals and forget about it and just take all of our military hardware, concentrate it in East Asia and get ready to fight China or try and deter China from going to war with us. So that School of thought is developing in the United States because of Xi’s actions.

 

And basically, the longer that the current trajectory of things, or Xi’s basically kind of led trajectory of things continues, the closer and closer World War III gets, basically. So that’s like the strategic context.

 

Meanwhile, Xi had spent years concentrating power, purging rival factions, stuffing the party full of his allies.

 

But then in the last year, you’re seeing a kind of a bit of like a backflip. A lot of his allies getting purged, his public appearances like I said earlier, being curtailed. The tone in the media, he’s getting criticised. Not openly directly criticised but getting indirectly criticised by a lot of people and then other rivals, other old heads basically in the Chinese Communist Party not directly criticising his Taiwan policy but advocating for a far more restrained Taiwan policy in their public statements, including this Zhang Yuga guy who is the 2IC [Second in Charge] over military affairs. Basically the guy running the Chinese military who’s presiding over a lot of these purges that happening to these Xi’s top guys, who basically is the highest Ranking dude in the Chinese military structure.

 

So it’s interesting because what it seems like is that however internal dynamics have been seized its hard to tell from the outside. It seems like there’s been a move against Xi. Not necessarily that he’s going to get replaced as leader although there’s some speculation that he could be literally about to be replaced. That would be very uncharacteristic. Usually they don’t. Someone’s elected to do a five year term that would mean Xi’s term doesn’t end till 2027 that it would continue. But he’s being sidelined. There was an announcement a few days ago that a so-called joint decision making body was being created at the top of the CCP and Xi Jinping, you know, has really kind of pushed for a long time. He is the leader. His interpretation of policy is the prevailing interpretation and China will be strong if basically it subordinates itself to him and his leadership. And that’s the way a lot of the top officials in the Communist Party were talking for years. Now the tone has shifted. Now they’re talking about power sharing and committees of decision makers and how everyone in the party needs to be included like the party leadership in decision making. We need to create more committees and have more what they call Democratic Centralism which basically means there’s one central decision making body but within that body you have democracy. So the Chinese people don’t have democracy but the party leadership collaboratively make decisions.

 

[51:56]

 

So they’re trying to cuck Xi, strip him of his kind of authoritarian power and kind of subordinate him to the other elements within the party. There is a rise in prominence of the so-called party elders who represent this more liberal view that I was describing earlier.

 

And the backdrop of this is also that the Chinese economy is slowing. So my view, Ron Unz put this view forward with some compelling evidence. I remember a few years ago, and I think it makes sense, is that Covid was probably a bioweapon created by an element of the United States government. I don’t know which element, whether it was a rogue element or it was directly under Trump himself ordered it to be done or what, we don’t know, I don’t know exactly. But some element within the US Government unleashed that bioweapon on China.

 

And I think it also had a secondary purpose of facilitating all these economic policy or financial policy actions where basically in the United States the economy was hurtling towards really difficult times. Covid happens they just then flood the market with all of this money to prop it up by basically bailing out all the major companies, all the major banks, basically massive wealth transfer, just giving trillions and trillions of dollars to the American financial elite. That’s basically what they did during Covid.

 

And no one was in the streets protesting it like they were after the global financial crisis because everyone was arguing about vaccine mandates and vaccines and lockdowns and blah, blah, blah, Covid shit! Because everyone was arguing about Covid bullshit, no one was arguing about:

 

“What the fuck! The richest people in the world just stole $15 trillion off us. What are we going to do about it?”

 

Well, no one did anything.

 

And I think that was basically like the psyop. Like they, it was like a sleight of hand. Like we can’t just do another 2008 style bank bailout. So fabricate this bullshit crisis that gets all the goys into this false paradigm, and we’ll have them argue within that space for a year and a half and then once we’ve transferred $15 trillion to the financial elite, we’ll just close the paradigm and then we’ll just pretend like everything’s gone back to normal. Which is what happened! That’s literally what happened!

 

There was no permanent vaccine passports or what. Remember everyone was saying:

 

“If you don’t get the vaccine, you’re going to get put in a camp and vaccines are going to kill everyone!”

 

And all this kind of stuff.

 

And obviously the vaccines were fucked up! I’m very glad I didn’t get one. And who knows what the long term effects of those things are going to be. It’s kind of scary to think about. But I think a lot of the catastrophe, the kind of catastrophism that many people had, has been shown to be false because everyone hasn’t dropped dead. There’s some evidence that it’s had an impact on fertility. I saw a study recently that about a third. It’s got like a 33% drop basically in the fertility of women who got the vax versus the ones who didn’t. Something like that, which is significant.

 

But I don’t know. I didn’t read the study closely enough to know if it was controlled for the fact that a lot of the women who didn’t get the vax are also quite conservative. So wouldn’t they be more like as a demographic, be more likely to have more children? Because you know, when I think about the kind of women I know they didn’t get the vax. Usually they’re very Right-wing, very conservative, very traditional. A lot of Christians didn’t get the vaccine because they thought it had something to do with the mark of the Beast and the book of Revelation. People who are into conspiracy theories, people who are in the dissident Right who listen to Right-wing memes. We’re the kind of demographic that didn’t get the vax, the non-conformist types. Well, we’re also probably a demographic that are more likely to have kids at higher rates because we kind of reject the mainstream programming, eat healthier, have more traditional values and so on.

 

So I don’t know if that’s all it is. Just like the vax was predominantly taken by people that are libtards and normies and they just got a lower birth rate than Right-wingers, or if there’s something actually in the vax that’s causing the fertility issue. But whatever the case may be, the consequences don’t seem to have been as catastrophic as what people were saying.

 

So while they had you arguing about that, this is what they were doing.

 

[56:35]

 

But I also think part of why they released Covid specifically in Wuhan in China is in order to basically try and slow down the Chinese economy. Because prior to Covid, the Chinese economy was growing at breakneck speed. It was growing like two or three times as fast as the United States economy and had been for decades. So China’s flying and they’re building up their military power. Xi is in power. He is the strongest leader since Mao, most consolidated authoritarian leader since Mao. Militaristic, nationalistic, getting more and more aggressive on Taiwan, more and more assertive in the world.

 

Something needed to be done to slow this mother fucker down! Boom! Covid! Drop Covid in China. What happens to Asians when they think that there’s a disease happening? They freak the fuck out! I remember like it was all the Chinese that bought all the toilet paper and stuff when Covid broke out and you couldn’t get toilet paper for months, it was a nightmare because Asians are hyper anxious people and Asians would always wear masks whenever they get sick, even before Covid. That’s part of their culture because Asians are bug people who live in giant cities full of millions of people. Disease spreads very easily in Asian societies and so they’ve culturally adapted to be more threat avoidant and neurotic about diseases than White people because we don’t live in the same kind of environments on average.

 

So it’s also why conservatives and people who live in the countryside were less freaked out than inner city like libtard cosmopolitans because they’re more like Asians. They live in these kind of more clustered environments where they have contact with more humans per day and so they’re more neurotic and so on about these things.

 

But anyway, the point is that you drop a disease like that in China, it’s going to shut down the economy. And it did that very effectively. China’s economy still hasn’t recovered from Covid, like their official figures still look kind of decent, but if you really scratch beneath the surface and you look at the underlying numbers, the Chinese economy hasn’t recovered from Covid. It’s actually slowed down to about the pace of the United States economy in terms of its growth. And yeah, there’s a lot of structural problems with the Chinese economy. Like you can see they’re claiming publicly that the economy is growing at 5% and everything’s fine. But youth unemployment is high. And look at the underlying numbers.

 

Like if you look at prices, house prices, industrial goods prices and so on, these prices are stagnating or falling, which indicates a lack of demand. So it means people don’t have money, businesses don’t have money, people don’t have money to buy houses, to invest in expanding business operations, whatever.

 

So that shows that there’s some structural problems inside the economy. You know, in China, it’s hard to trust any statistics that come out of China because there’s all these incentives to lie because they, everything’s managed by central committees and those central committees are assessed based upon these metrics. So of course they’re going to lie about the metrics to make themselves look better. And everything in Chinese, you know, culture is about saving face and not appearing weak, not appearing incompetent or whatever.

 

So I think it’s quite clear the Chinese economy has slowed down. Covid was very effective in doing that. It slowed down international trade, which China’s dependent upon. It also just literally caused all these lockdowns all through China that went on for ages. That this like zero Covid policy that persisted for a long, very long time. Their lockdowns went on longer than any other country. They were still doing lockdowns I think in 2022, when everyone else was open and back to normal. So that really fucked them up. And there’s a lot of evidence that the Americans released it.

 

Like for example, the so-called Wuhan lab where this thing was built was literally funded by Bill Gates, right? He’s a fucking American! And Anthony Fauci was like working there. Like, what’s going on?

 

Also they had the World Military games in Wuhan at the same time that Covid was broke out or was released or whatever. We know that it was a genetically engineered disease. Okay, that’s kind of quite something like the World Military Games. So like US military people were there was like 600 guys or 800 guys from the US military in Wuhan at the time when it was released.

 

So the US had people there that could have released it. And you know, there’s a lot of links to people that have links to the ruling class in America. So you know, why would, if the Chinese created a bioweapon, why would they release it in their own country? Wouldn’t you release it in someone else’s country? Like who releases bioweapons in their own country? Like that’s insane!

 

Also there were suppressed reports at the same time that it was released in Wuhan that Covid spontaneously was also released in Iran and in Russia, but it was never reported on in Western media. They just only focused on the Chinese release. That’s kind of interesting. Like the other two, like major American geopolitical enemies or whatever.

 

So yeah, I think that there was something nefarious that went on there. I think it was intentional. It’s beyond a shadow of a doubt that Covid was biologically engineered. Like that’s just confirmed at this point.

 

So the question is, who released it? Would China release a bioweapon in their own country that ended up fucking up their own economy? Or would America do it? Not only did it fuck up the Chinese economy, it greatly benefited the American ruling class.

 

So think about it. Why would China do that?

 

[1:02:34]

 

But anyway, my point is that all of these dynamics are occurring. You could see why elements within Chinese Communist Party would move against Xi because the economy is stagnating. Xi is a hardliner. Xi wants to isolate the Chinese economy from the rest of the world. Doesn’t want American cultural influence, doesn’t want foreign financial interests coming into China, gaining a foothold in the Chinese economy. Doesn’t want Chinese elites developing too close relationships with people in the West, with Western elites, and becoming disloyal to China. Right. He’s a nationalist, and that’s why he has those views. It makes sense.

 

The elements within China that support liberalisation, that want to have a better relationship with the United States, that don’t want to kind of rock the boat, have a war over, potential World War over Taiwan that could destabilise China irrevocably, potentially. They lose a war like that. Like, it could be over for the Communist Party in China who are right now, you know, elites that are doing well, that are rich, successful, whatever, have good positions in Chinese society. Do they want to go to war with America over Taiwan? Do they feel as passionate as Xi does about these nationalist policies? No! A lot of them don’t. And they make public statements that show that they don’t. So if Xi got sick, showed weakness or this weakness that he has at the moment because the economy isn’t doing so well and so on, maybe they’ve chosen this as the time to move because Xi had consolidated so much power, and that’s why we’re seeing this switch up within Chinese politics.

 

But a lot of this is speculative and kind of reading between the lines on a lot of things that people are saying in China. It will become clearer in the coming weeks and months. I think the next plenary session, the fourth plenary session in China is occurring on, like, August. That’s going to be key, seeing how that plays out, you know how Xi behaves, public statements made by other leading figures and so on, that’ll say a lot about whether Xi has been sidelined or at the very least, radically cucked in how much power he has over the Chinese Communist Party and how much other elements of the party are resurging in power and influence.

 

And based upon that, it’ll completely reset the clock on the World War III clock. Is World War III going to happen? Is a war between America and China going to happen this decade? If Xi manages to hold and reconsolidate power and this is all bullshit! Or he can turn it around? Potentially, yes. This could embolden him to go:

 

“Okay, well, I almost got defeated. Now’s the chance for the power and glory. Defeat the United States. The Chinese century beckons. I’m a great man of history!”

 

Invades Taiwan. Boom! World War III! Or Xi can’t come back from this. He’s been defeated. He’s been internally outpositioned. All these top guys are taken out. He’s basically been undermined, and it’s basically over for the Xi era. If that happens, there’s not going to be a war with Taiwan anytime soon.

 

And obviously, the big Trump tariffs that were dumped on China only exacerbated these problems, and they’ll probably go down as a strategic masterstroke, which future generations look back at this. The key is, as well, there was a recent negotiation between the Americans and the Chinese. I think it was in London or something, over a trade agreement between the United States and China, an agreement to bring down their mutual tariffs on one another and so on. What’s kind of interesting about that, Xi said nothing about it. Zero! Wasn’t involved, hasn’t made one public statement about it. It’s a pretty big fucking deal, you would think.

 

But not only has Xi not said anything about it, nobody in the Chinese government has really stated any substance at all about what was negotiated. But Trump walks away from that negotiation immediately. He is saying:

 

“I’ve secured an incredible deal and we’re going to open China up. And it’s an incredible deal with massive progress and my negotiating team, they’re the best in the world!”

 

Why was Trump so happy and why is China not saying anything? Very suspicious.

 

Some people are suspecting that it’s because basically the faction that Trump negotiated with, it’s not Xi’s faction, it’s the faction undermining Xi. And basically, until they can fully cuck go formally or get him to step down while saving face or something, they’re not going to announce the deal. So what’s in that deal? When that deal gets made public again, that’s going to be a key indication of where China is at. Because there’s no way that Xi, based upon his philosophy, his ideology, would be willing to make any concessions to the United States. You know, he’s a staunch nationalist. Whereas, yeah, other elements in the CCP absolutely would, in order to preserve economic stability, because the Chinese economy is not doing great! And their view is that the way that they gain the support of the Chinese people predominantly is through managing the economy well. They don’t have a democracy, they don’t get voted in, but they say:

 

“Qu hey, look, you don’t get to vote in your leaders. But look at the great job that we’re doing. You know, China’s constantly developing. Everyone’s getting richer, everyone’s getting more opportunities, everyone’s making more money. So don’t rock the boat. Just trust the plan!”

 

Right? And that obviously has worked for a certain period of time, but what happens when it stops working? I don’t think a lot of people in the higher ups in the CCP want to find out what happens, and I think a lot of them don’t want to go to war with the United States. I think they’re afraid, and understandably so, because they could get absolutely blasted! Like, even if they were to win, they would take a lot of damage, and it could basically set back the whole project forever. It could destabilise the Chinese Communist Party’s grip on power entirely.

 

I mean, what if the United States there’s certain dams in southern China that some analysts say if you bomb them, it could cause a flood that could kill hundreds of millions of people! If you do a naval blockade on China, it could cause a famine that could kill hundreds of millions of people! Like, the United States is over 7,000 nuclear weapons like the do you really want to have World War III against the power that’s that powerful? And when you’re that vulnerable? A lot of them probably might view Xi as a madman! And the Chinese are not risk takers. They’re not a nation of Hitlers. They’re not a nation of blitzkriegers. They’re not a nation of poker players. You know, they’re a mercantile race of Art of War, you know, Wu Wei, do nothing, win. That’s kind of like the Chinese, you know, philosophy and mentality is being conservative, being harmonious relations and all this gay shit! They don’t have the Faustian spirit.

 

[1:10:09]

 

So basically what I’m saying is that we’re probably at the on the brink here of total chudjack victory. If Xi loses his grip on power, World War 3 will not happen anytime soon. So that radically kind of changes the calculations. And that actually also, I think, explains why Israel might have decided to kick things off with Iran. The Israelis, they might have gained intelligence that China is weak. And they think:

 

“Well, if we try and escalate things with Iran now, the Americans might have more confidence that the Chinese won’t do shit over Taiwan. And so we can start forcing the issue on Iran.”

 

Basically that’s why they chose to move now, partly maybe because Trump is in power, but also partly because, yeah, maybe the China threat isn’t as imminent as as many previously thought, if Xi’s power is weakened.

 

So anyway, big dynamics, I think, like very complicated, lots of moving parts. But yeah, nothing ever happens. Nothing ever fucking happens! Yeah. Relying on China to move world history, I guess, was a mistake. I mean, think about the kind of people we’re dealing with here.

 

So anyway, I think that’s interesting and important to report because from an Australian nationalist perspective, World War III, if it was to happen, would completely change everything. So we kind of have to have our finger on the pulse of like how, like, are we at Defcon4 or like, where are we at on the, is World War III gonna happen rating scale? Because that’s a massive spanner in the works.

 

I’ll go through a few Superchats. I see Ultra Saxon said:

 

“I’d love to see you guys do a stream with Karl Radl from X. Every post of him is a gem and he’s super informative on National Socialism. Respect from England, lads.”

 

Yeah, Karl, I’ve seen his stuff. I would like to do. I think he’s more of like a Twitter guy. I don’t think he does video streams. I never seen him do a video stream before. Maybe I’m wrong, like, correct me if I’m wrong. But yeah, maybe like a Twitter space or something like it would be interesting too. I think I actually proposed that to him and then I got banned from Twitter. But make an alt account and have a conversation. If he was interested, I’d be down to discuss. Seems like his wheelhouse is World War II history and NS German history. That’s obviously quite interesting. Dan3 said:

 

“There are apparently experts saying that China has less than half their official population using salt consumption and other stats to estimate their population. Don’t know this is whether this is propaganda though.”

 

Oh, you’re saying that there’s some estimates that their population is much smaller than they say?

 

Yeah, I mean, I don’t know about that. I don’t think they’d be able to like lie about something that effectively. But you definitely can’t trust the stats you hear out of China. Megawatts 80 said:

 

“Everyone watching should send a few bucks. Hail victory!”

 

Well, I can’t disagree with that. Sector88 said:

 

“Any opinion on the Yanks reviewing the AUKUS agreement? I don’t believe we’ll be getting the Virginia subs until the late 2000s at best. No matter the a administration, unless they somehow double or triple sub production.”

 

Yeah, it, there does seem to be a great lag on that.

 

But I don’t see them ripping up the AUKUS agreement because at the end of the day it’s in the strategic interest of the Americans for us to have better subs. You know, the current subs that the Australian military has basically not going to last much longer. The old subs, they’re going to be decommissioned. We need to have new subs somehow and we don’t have a programme in place to build our own. The Americans aren’t going to want us to have no subs.

 

Also, we’re paying big money for their subs, so of course they’d like to sell them to us. And the nuclear capable subs are important just purely for the fact that, well, you don’t have to refuel. The nuclear reactor lasts like 30 years or whatever. So that’s an incredible capability where you can effectively just stay at the bottom of the ocean as long as you want. Incredible technology. So from a strategic standpoint it’s vital if we want to assist the Americans in engaging in like a naval blockade against China to have that kind of thing. There’s a reason why the Chinese freak out about AUKUS and they don’t want us having nuclear subs is because nuclear subs are effective as fuck! Like they’re incredible technology, and not that many countries have them. Ultra Saxon said:

 

“Joel, have you ever heard of the concept of a Canzak union? You see the idea amongst normie Libs, but I see it being a great long term geostrategic strategy for reuniting and re empowering the Anglo sphere.”

 

Yeah, I mean in principle I don’t necessarily think it would be so bad, but there’s a few things why I don’t think it’s realistic.

 

[1:15:44]

 

Number one, Canada is basically the strategic bitch of the United States. So being able to deal with Canada as an independent state is unlikely. Also Australia’s main allies, the United States and Britain’s main allies, the United States.

 

So this idea that we could all come together and form a union that was somehow not integrated with the United States is unlikely to be something that the United States would be too happy about. So it would only really happen if there was a massive sea change in the respective politics of our three countries. It’s unlikely that that sea change is going to be the same in all three.

 

So let’s say like nationalists, let’s say like we win in Australia. Is libtard Britain or libtard Canada going to want to make some kind of alliance with us? Probably not. And vice versa. So I don’t see it as super likely.

 

Also, there’s radically different. Like, there isn’t a lot of economic trade between the Anglo-sphere countries. Like Australia trades a lot with them. Like all three trade a lot with America. We don’t trade much with each other. Like the Canadian economy is very similar to Australia’s in the sense it has a lot of minerals and so on. We both need to trade with like manufacturing powers to like, get the most out of our economy. So like, economic integration doesn’t make as much sense as it does in say, Europe.

 

Also, we’re geographically quite isolated from one another in different regions of the world.

 

So I think, yeah, the argument is, oh, but we’ve got similar culture, similar forms of government, good relations, similar heritage. Yeah, okay, like, but why does that mean? Like, what would the union be? Just like a union where like, we’re already in a military alliance with one another, basically. Like Canada and Britain are both in NATO. Australia’s not in NATO, but we’re like a NATO partner or whatever. So like, what would it really do? Like freedom of movement? Again, like say, like we take power in Australia as nationalists. Do we want to have freedom of movement with Britain and Canada? No, because then they’re going to like flood Australia with nons. I’d rather just have an immigration policy that takes White people from those countries. So yeah I don’t really see what like the point of Canzuk Union is like from a strategic standpoint. So I don’t really see it happening.

 

But like, let’s say we took power in Australia, we would look to take over New Zealand. As well, that’s undoubtedly true. And then we would probably look to support nationalist forces in Britain as best we could. And then if we that was successful, then we’d form an alliance on those terms. Be very different than the Canzuk Union.

 

Then, like, let’s say, like our guys are running Australia and Britain and there was this idea of getting the empire back together and building an imperial federation that fuses the two countries. We could look into it down the track.

 

But yeah, it would be difficult probably because at that point, like the Australian identity, the British identity had diverged so much at that point. We’re on opposite sides of the planet, completely different strategic objectives. Like is Britain going to want to fight to the death to defend Australia’s geopolitical interests and vice versa? You know, maybe they are, maybe they aren’t. But that’s usually you get those kinds of alliances between countries that border each other. Dan3 also said. Oh no, I already read that.

 

Modern World Reject, he just hailed! Awesome! Hail you. Modern world reject said:

 

“How World War III affect nationalist politics in Australia?”

 

Well, if it was to happen, massively! Number one, the regime here would have to completely change its attitude on racism. You know, they would basically have to allow anti-Chinese racism in society because they would have to find a rationale basically to either mass incarcerate or mass deport almost, 2 million Chinese people that live in Australia. There’s about one Chinese person for every 10 White people in Australia. Like that’s how you gonna go to war with China and just allow them to walk around and be, hold high ranking positions in society and trust them like it’s not feasible. Also if you want to fight a war you need patriotism.

 

So you’re gonna have to wind back the woke shit, allow people to be kind of racist. If you’re going to want to try and convince young White Australian men to fight a World War, you can’t keep flooding their country with foreigners. You can’t keep pushing the current like ridiculously woke anti-White agenda down their throats. They won’t fight for you! They won’t sign up. So there would have to be a completely new deal made. Like the government would have to make a lot of concessions to us.

 

And I think after the war everything would be radically different. I think after a war like that, it would become defining in world history, in Australian history. The memory of World War II would fade and the whole paradigm of the post World War II international order would collapse. And it’d be a Great Reset basically. Not in the kind of Claus Schwabian sense, but it’d be like a full reset basically of ideologically, historically and so on.

 

[1:21:40]

 

And ultimately if Australia came out of it intact, I think it’d be good for nationalism. I think nationalism would grow in a post World War III Australia much more quickly and more forcefully than you know, in the current order. It’d be a great shake up, a great reality check.

 

Megawatt said:

 

“Touch on the SA political donation laws. Will this go national?”

 

I have to read up on it first. Not too aware of South Australia’s political donation laws. Rygo Weber said:

 

“Joel, will you or Blair be running as Senators in the next election? I think you would be quite effective. Thanks for the show.”

 

Yeah, we’re looking at doing something like that. Obviously we’ve got to launch the party. It’s a long time to the next federal election. You got to decide what we want to do with the state elections that happened before then. So exactly how it all fits together is a bit open ended because there’s a long way between now and then. There’s a lot to consider. Yeah, we’re gonna have a crack.

 

What else we got here. On Entropy Racist Aristocrats, he said, this is directed at Blair after last week:

 

“Blair, when Joel violates liberal norms, for example, equating the desire for a White man to marry an African with marrying a dog. Why the knee jerk reaction to sheepishly moderated. Who are you hoping to placate? Seems rather inexplicably explicably discordant.”

 

Okay, well that’s kind of funny. Says here:

 

“Joel, Cameron McGregor has a worthwhile fourth turning influence. Take positing America and Australia, by inference remains in the adolescent stage of development. He’s a coming war of reintegration of the state and national White Identity driven polarisation, catalyzing White unification and ending pluralism and disintegration. He sees Whites awakening to race, the jewish question and distrust of modern capitalism as preconditions for state transition to adulthood. You two could have a fruitful chat.”

 

Well, I don’t know who that is, but sounds good. So if he’s out there, he wants to get in touch. By all means, yeah.

 

I will say another couple things, another couple things that have been on my mind this week that are interesting to observe. So whilst you’re seeing these big kind of moves in China, behind the scenes shifting of power in America, you’re also seeing an interesting dynamic emerge where I remember when Musk and Trump had a falling out, they then kind of patched things up and I said I don’t see this lasting. Well, I think I was correct about that. Musk has been very vocal over the past week in his opposition to the so-called Big Beautiful Bill. And there’s reports that he’s going to fund Thomas Massie, who is the Israel critical Republican, the only Republican that’s not taking money from AIPAC or whatever. He’s going to fund his primary campaign because Trump is backing his opponent because Trump hates Massey because Massey’s basically not going along with the Zionist agenda.

 

So that’s interesting to see that Musk is going to step in and take Massey’s side and drive this kind of wedge between using the Israel issue to drive a wedge within the Republican Party.

 

Because as I said, Musk’s position is awkward in American politics because he’s completely abandoned the Left. The Left hate him! The Left maybe hate him more than Trump because he’s said and done maybe things that are more radical than what even Trump has done. Well, just objectively are like he’s throwing Romans and kind of statements that he’s made. But also he didn’t successfully win over Republicans. Musk is awkward, he’s a nerd. He’s not even American. And he’s kind of like a [word unclear] to Trump’s movement. Trump has organic charisma. He’s a real American. He’s beloved by the people and he’s the president.

 

So the average, you know, red blooded, Right-wing American sides with Trump against Musk. And also Trump doesn’t see himself as beholden to Musk. He sees Musk is below him in the hierarchy. Doesn’t matter how many hundreds of millions Musk kind of threw at him. Musk wasn’t able to get what he wanted out of Trump. He wasn’t able to get what he wanted out of MAGA, if you will.

 

And so now Musk is in political no man’s land. He’s the richest man in America on paper. He is entirely dependent his business models basically on American government subsidies. So he needs political power on his side. But he’s alienated both major sides of politics. So what do you do in a situation like that? Well, if you’re the world’s, world’s richest man on paper, you’re probably going to try and fund a third faction into existence. And that’s what you see his early moves.

 

So I could see Musk making bigger moves going ahead and it could be a real kind of I don’t like Musk in the sense that he, any kind of like pro-White stuff that he said to try and like win us over, he kind of like showed his true colours on the H1B Indian saga where he sided with stuffing America full of Indian H1B Visa types as opposed to preserving the White majority.

 

So that shows where he stands slike he’s not truly loyal to us or our concerns.

 

But nevertheless, when you see inter elite competition, it’s a good thing. It means that there’s dynamism in politics. It means it opens up opportunities for dissidents because you’re probably going to get more free speech, more open exchange of ideas, more dynamism in politics if you have two rival factions on the Right competing for the approval of the Right-wing masses. And what Musk showed through that whole H1B Visa saga is that he does care about maintaining a positive public image and that he has political ambitions.

 

[1:28:31]

 

So it could be a real challenger to like the Peter Thiel Donald Trump network. J.D. Vance, you know, is the heir apparent to Trump as president. If Musk can find a candidate that’s capable of taking on Vance, Vance is going to have a real challenger with hundreds of millions behind him. And I said before, if Tucker Carlson wanted to run for president against J.D. Vance, for example. I think Elon Musk would give him hundreds of millions of dollars and I think he’d beat J.D. Vance.

 

So that’s a situation to monitor as well. Big dynamics in America and China, like deep politics, elite politics that could really define what direction the wind is going to flow, going to blow over the next few years and kind of define the next decade or generation in international politics.

 

So that’s something that I noticed as well, something to keep an eye on. But an issue that I wanted to discuss as well, to kind of end the show, I guess, is I’ve got a Superchat coming. I’ll read a couple of these and then I’ll discuss this. Rabbi Shlomo Noisberg said:

 

“A hundred dollars. What do you need $90 for? I’m not going to give you an $80 Superchat to a racist, anti-semite. That $70 is mine. All right, fine, I’ll give you $60. But this is not a gift, it’s a loan and I want interest.”

 

Well, you’re not getting interest. I don’t even know who the hell you are. Dad3 said:

 

“Do you think the English will have a great man like Hitler and Napoleon in a few decades after the Civil War? Maybe three original Germanic great powers are supposed to have one after a disaster!”

 

I want to know what kind of question that is.

 

Yeah, I think that’s all the Superchats, but yeah, like one thing I want to discuss is the issue of settler colonialism. There’s been a lot of discussion precipitated, I think, by anti-Israel discourse. There’s been a lot of discussion on the Right. The dissonant Right. About the issue of settler colonialism. And there’s basically two major schools of thought. One is we should oppose ourselves to the idea of settler colonialism and talk about jewish supremacy and talk about how Israel is this horrible evil colonial power who’s stealing away land from the Palestinians. And this will help us educate White people on the jews and show that the jews are the bad guys, not Whites, and that Whites don’t want to hurt anyone. And we just want to have our own countries too. And yeah, and we can kind of focus all of the ire that’s directed against imperialism and colonialism and so on against jews and that this would be in our interest.

 

And sometimes these people say if you don’t agree with this, you must be jewish or Joel is a secret Zionist because he doesn’t agree with us.

 

The other position, my position, is that we should oppose Israel on the basis that Israel is a parasitical and subversive force of zionism, let’s say in general, because it’s not just the state of Israel, it’s also the jewish diasporas that live in our countries. They’re a subversive and parasitical force on our countries, White countries, Australia, America and particular Britain, so on. They’ve completely taken over the Right-wing. They have incredible power over the media and they use their power and influence to siphon off resources and support for Israel even though Australia and America and Britain have no strategic interest whatsoever in Israel. Like actually. They’ve captured politicians in America through incredibly nefarious means, like where they’re running paedophile networks and shit like that! They have [word unclear] like British monarchs and you know, elites from across society. Who knows how deep that goes. This is why we should oppose Israel. They’ve dragged us into wars we had no business fighting for no strategic benefit to ourselves. They taken over the Right-wing and redirect the Right-wing towards, in our countries towards their interests as opposed to representing the interests of our actual nation and people. This is what we should be criticising them for what they’re doing to us!

 

Like in Australia recently, you know, we’ve been going, doing a lot of activism and discussing a lot about the involvement of the organised jewish community and probably the Mossad in leveraging false flag, so-called anti-semitic attacks to push through an agenda to attack our free speech, to make it illegal for us to criticise jews in Israel and other racial groups as well.

 

That’s why we should be criticising jews. We should be explaining to the people of White Australians, White Americans and so on what jews are doing to them and why jews are their enemy. I think going on about like bleeding hearts about the poor Palestinians and this kind of shit is the wrong trajectory because it plays into the same moral framework that is used to describe how the poor Aboriginals and the horrors of colonialism, White colonialism or you know, the poor African slaves in America or etc. Etc, etc. It’s the same morality and framing that is used as a stick to beat the White man. And it’s generally appeals to Leftists who are anti-White, who hate the British Empire, who hate the White Australia Policy, who hate the racist founding of America, blah blah, blah blah, who hate us and everything that we stand for.

 

So to me that’s insane! The argument they make is:

 

“Well if you try and if you try and defend settler colonialism, if you say oh well, Australia was built on settler colonialism, then you’re just being the bad guy.”

Apparently you’re being the bad guy. You’re playing into the narrative of the enemy. Apparently this is what these people say. And no one’s going to support your White nationalist movement. What you have to do is say:

 

“You know what, I agree with the Left, Aboriginals were treated horribly and we don’t deserve to have this country because we’re horrible colonial occupiers!”

 

[1:35:31]

 

And somehow acknowledging all of that is going to help us to advance White nationalism. Like it doesn’t make any sense to me. It’s very simple. This country was built on settler colonialism. This country was built on our people coming here, conquering it, taking it off the people who were previously here, asserting our dominance over it, securing it for our people, fighting for it, defending it, building it up into what it is.

 

And that’s how shit works, that’s how nature works. We live in a dog-eat-dog world. Everything anyone has in this world was taken off someone else at some point. There’s a finite amount of resources on this planet. There’s not enough to go around. Some people win, some people lose. I want to win, I don’t want to lose. And when you assert your interest in this world, someone loses out. There’s never a way to be a totally nice guy and for everyone to get everything that they want. It just doesn’t work like that. That’s not how God made Earth, the universe. If you don’t like that, take it up with God. But that’s how it is, that’s reality.

 

And this idea that we need to be like 20th century liberals, we can’t assert the morality of any of our ancestors before 20th century, post World War II liberalism. We can’t say the British Empire was glorious! We can’t say the colonisation of Australia was glorious! That we can’t assert the interests of White people and White Australians just because we are White and because no one’s going to look after us but ourselves. It’s ridiculous!

 

That’s a message that makes complete sense. I believe in it. And I don’t think White people are going to be able to do what is necessary to take back control of our countries unless they’re willing to accept a message like that. I don’t think this so-called normie demographic that exists out there that is willing to be White nationalists only so long as White nationalists chungus pilled and respect everyone and don’t want to assert their superiority of everyone and want to like eke out space for everyone’s human rights and treat everyone amazingly and love everybody. I don’t think these people really exist. I think people who need to be placated to like that actually are against us and won’t embrace our politics no matter how chungus, no matter how moral fagged we make it.

 

And I also believe that the average person is capable of understanding that we live in a world of struggle. That life is struggle. That you got to fight for it, you got to fight for your existence on this planet. And that either we’re going to fight for our collective existence as a people or it’s going to be taken from us and that those are the two options on the table. We need a reality check! We need to come come to reality on this question. We can’t live in this illusion that if we just frame things with the Right moral arguments and make the right amount of concessions that we can somehow negotiate a perfectly nice and non-violent and non-controversial way for us to continue existing on this planet and to continue having our own countries. It’s the mentality of a fucking cuck. It’s the mentality of a loser.

 

We have strength as a race. Incredible collective strength! If we come together and assert our interests together. If we’re willing to come together and fight for our existence, we can secure it. That’s what it comes down to.

 

And I’m not going to forsake the incredible actions of my ancestors. I’m going to venerate them. What they did to create this country. Stealing countries of other peoples is something that few peoples are actually capable of I don’t consider it to be an immoral thing, I think you either fight for it or you don’t deserve it. If we lost World War II to the Japanese, if we ultimately one day lose this country to other races, other forces, ultimately we’d have no one to blame but ourselves for not fighting with enough valiance, for not mustering enough strength and power to hold on to what is ours. We have to take responsibility to secure our own future. No one else on this planet owes us anything and we don’t owe them anything. That’s reality.

 

And I want to live in reality. I don’t want to live in this fucked gay ideological delusion that some people in this movement want to live in. And I don’t want to pretend to believe things I don’t believe.

 

A lot of people say:

 

“Hey, look man I don’t really believe this shit either, but it’s going to help us make jews look bad or it’s going to help us win over moderates to our position if we just pretend to believe in it.”

 

I don’t believe in pretending to believe in shit! Pretending to believe in shit is inauthentic. It’s not how we’re going to convince people to stand side by side with us and fight for an objective, is pretending to believe things we don’t believe.

 

The way that we’re going to get men to stand behind us and fight to believe in our cause, believe in our movement, is to actually believe what we believe and say it proudly and openly! To have faith in our ideas, that our ideas are inherently have so much truth and potency and value that they will succeed. That’s how we’re going to win!

 

And yeah I’ve had this argument before with people. They say:

 

“Oh, I’m a universal nationalist. I believe in nationalism for all people.”

 

Well, that’s a nice thing for you to say. So are you going to go and fight for Algerian nationalism? Are you going to go and fight the Sri Lankan nationalism? No, you don’t actually give a fuck about Azerbaijani nationalism or Venezuelan nationalism. You say you believe in everyone’s right being equal to having a nation, but you’re not willing to fight for everyone’s nation. You’re willing to fight for your nation and maybe some brother nations that you have.

 

[1:42:01]

 

So maybe if you’re an Australian, you’d be willing to fight for Britain because that’s the land of your ancestors. You’re willing to fight for Ireland or whatever. If the Americans had a civil war, you’d be willing to go and fight for the White team because they’re our ethnic cousins or something like that. Okay, that makes sense.

 

But if you aren’t really willing to fight and die for it, you don’t actually believe in it, to any significant or deep level that it’s of consequence.

 

So why can’t you just say you’re an Australian nationalist and just say you want to fight for a White Australia? Anyone who has a problem with that, you want to crush them. You want to crush them and destroy them because it’s us or them! That’s what we believe in. Why isn’t that good enough? Good enough for me.

 

Maybe it’s not good enough for you’re a liar. Like, you’re just a liar. You don’t actually really believe what you’re saying. You’re trying to come up with a strategy, like a marketing, like a moral marketing strategy where you pretend to have this morality that’s nice to everyone so that people will allow you to have your own country or something. It doesn’t mean that we should have like zero allies or zero respect for other people. But let’s be real here. Why can’t you’re asserting your own interests in your own and the future of your own people?

 

Like and for example, in Australia, we have a military alliance with Japan. The Japanese are a completely different people. I think the Japanese are an incredible nation, incredible cultural achievements, whatever. I wouldn’t fight for Japan unless it was in Australia. I’d fight for Australia if we were like allied in a war together and it made sense, it was in our interest to fight together against a mutual enemy. But I wouldn’t fight for Japan. I don’t think it would be a good thing if Japan was like, wiped off the face of the planet necessarily. I think they’re interesting, cool people. But I wouldn’t be willing to die to save Japan. So I can respect Japan. Maybe we could have an alliance with Japan if it’s in our interest. But I’m not a Japanese nationalist.

 

I don’t ultimately believe in some metaphysical right that the Japanese have to exist. Ultimately, it’s the responsibility of the Japanese to secure their own existence, and it’s the responsibility of White Australians to secure our own existence. And it’s the responsibility of Palestinians to secure their own existence and the responsibility of whatever group of people it is to secure their own existence on this planet. That’s how it works. That’s the iron Law of Nature. So Modern World reject said:

 

“We cannot negotiate for our existence. We must secure it through struggle.”

 

And he hailed and yeah, that’s basically the essence of my view. Someone said here:

 

“Joel didn’t get the Rabbi Noseberg meme.”

 

No, I did get the meme. I just didn’t think it was that funny. So I did like a kind of deadpan delivery.

 

Now, what else have we got here? I think that’s basically a good show for the evening. So give me some feedback. Did you still enjoy the show, even though it was just me riding solo? Don’t usually do this. I usually have the foil of having someone to talk to. It feels a bit weird just sitting here speaking into, like a laptop. Like, not talking to another human being. Feels a bit inorganic. But I’ve been doing this a long time, so I could still kind of sell it, I think. Jack Brady, given some respect:

 

“Excellent monologue.”

 

Well, I appreciate that. Friend of the show. Obviously been on the show before. High praise.

 

But, yeah, everyone’s seemed to enjoy the stream, so I’m glad you watched. I’m glad you listened. And yeah, got some things coming up. There was an interview by this guy called Hermes from the United States. He does like these street interviews that have been going viral lately. He’s obviously like a nationalist from America. Seems like a solid dude. I haven’t really spoken to him much before, but he interviewed Tom earlier this week, which you can find, I think, on Rumble. And we’re doing a collaboration soon. I’ll put out on my social media on Telegram, when we’re gonna go live. I think soon. I think maybe like Sunday, Australian time, Saturday night American time was the plan. But, yeah, I’ll put it out when it’s all, like, ready to go with links and stuff.

 

And I’m also going to do a collaboration with Ferryman from Canada next week. I think there’s a new Codex India documentary that’s going to be released. And they wanted us to do a kind of Watch Party promotion. The previous one was pretty funny. It was kind of like this David Attenborough narrating, like Pajeets in the Wild. I’m sure a lot of you have seen it. So anyhow, I don’t know what to expect. [chuckling] I haven’t seen it yet, but should be funny.

 

And yeah, there’s a few other things happening. So keep an eye on social media, keep in touch and we’ll fill you in on when we’re doing more content when we’re doing more activism, etc. And if you’re in Australia, join the fucking movement! ! WhiteAustralia.org, WhiteAus.org. If you don’t want to come and be a member of the NSN, marching around on the street, doing street activism, you can join and just come to the community events. You can come and train with us. Kickboxing, weightlifting, barbecues, seminars, we’re putting on more events. Come get involved in the community. At least get networked with fellow White nationalists.

 

And if you don’t even have time for that, at the very least, sign up as a supporter. Put your name down so we can get registered as a political party. We’re getting closer and closer to hitting the target. We haven’t even done an official launch yet. We will get more than enough signatures. Be a member of the party. We need members. So at least sign up as a member or even better, come and join the community. Come and get involved in a more direct capacity. A lot of events are going to be organised through the rest of the year.

 

[1:49:04]

 

The only way that we can turn around the political situation in this country is if White nationalists in Australia come together, join the Organisation, join the party and build a movement that can actually change things. We have the foundation of a movement that has the potential to really make an impact, which we haven’t had in this country for a long time. We’ve created that foundation.

 

The only way that that foundation can go into something actually tangible, making like, real, meaningful change is if everyone gets behind us and backs us. Even if it’s just as simple as just signing up as a member of our political party, which really is not asking for very much at all!

 

So WhiteAustralia.org. Sign up! Join up! You know, don’t you want to see us enter politics in Australia? Wouldn’t that bring you joy? Wouldn’t that be fucking awesome? Like, oh, you don’t want like me and Blair and Tom and shit running for office. You want to fucking vote for, who you voting for? Craig Kelly? You want to vote for Ralph Babet? You want to vote for Pauline Hanson? This shit sucks, man! Help us give awesome candidates! Our policies are going to be amazing! We’re going to break the fucking news cycle. We’re going to have the most interesting political party probably in the whole world. Fucking why have you not signed up yet? Sign up, help us win!

 

But yeah, anyway, so that’s the end of the stream. I hope you enjoyed it. And White power, blood and honour! Hail victory! See you all next time.

 

[1:51:06]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/11/2025 = 35)

J0hnC0nn0r
6 days ago
There is no question, they all need to leave
9 likes

Report
J0hnC0nn0r
6 days ago
You know why they removed the death penalty. Because if they used it in this case then it would be injected into the public consciousness as a solution and then the sheep might get ideas about applying it to other criminals.
7 likes

Report
JoshRecessionberg
Supporter
6 days ago
Society is falling apart with Jewish ‘democracy’
6 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
J0hnC0nn0r
5 days ago
Lets state the obvious
0 likes

Report
Lynchmob11
5 days ago
Awesome show. You should do a weekly solo show where you break down geopolitical events, since the other show is mainly centered upon Aussie politics.
5 likes

Report
SueNewson
5 days ago
you done a great job!
5 likes

Report
natogroyper
5 days ago
Great show, these type of shows that you do where you break down geopolitics from a Australian nationalist perspective are brilliant and its important. It’s something that we need more of. You really come into your own doing this type of content mate
5 likes

Report
leibekohne
6 days ago
Usury free world economy will solved lots of problems including wives staying at home. Also the wars will disappear no financing jew banks. In modern world China has never necessary ability to fight a long war. They could do nothing against small Japan. If that should happens the will end of humanity. Those problems, can be overcome by changing the communist China into Monarchy as used to be.
4 likes

Report
StevenGurr
3 days ago
Kill all pedo fags
3 likes

Report
katana17
6 days ago
[Joel Davis – Nothing is Happening, But It Will – Jun 26, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/06/28/joel-davis-nothing-is-happening-but-it-will-jun-26-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss ZOG vs Iran, Mark Latham vs Minns, the caravan hoax, Trump jews and Epstein, Israel with 200 nukes, JFK assassination, boomers being selfish, Holohoax Card wearing out, WWIII with China vs ZOG, jews not being flashy, Joel dreams of an Aston Martin, miscegenation, Human rights, NSN childcare policy, and current events, etc. – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 21,471 – Duration: 125 mins]
2 likes

Delete
J0hnC0nn0r
6 days ago
I dont agree with your idea to pay the mothers to stay at home instead of childcare, as that doesnt address the root cause of why the wahmen are working in the first place. Usually to pay for the usury loan and every other fucking rip off corporate swine and their small hat masters are perpetrating on the White race. Anything that undermines the ponzi scheme, aka forcing a collapse is the only option.
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
JoshRecessionberg
Supporter
5 days ago
You are a fool. Who is going to support a party advocating for an economic collapse? It is more like an economic transition that will have to be done smoothly and professionally in order to reinvigorate White Australia. Implementing policies in phases is the best approach. Talking about collapse is for low IQ blackpilled degenerates.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
J0hnC0nn0r
5 days ago
Sure thing fuck wit. Lets move jew money for daycare to middle class welfare, banksters dont care they still get their usury bucks, inflate property prices based on the extra income and keep the ponzi scheme going. Just to stick to your ad hominem attacks and idiocy, you clearly are a stupid zoomer cunt rash because this shit was done under Howard and led to much of this fucking mess. The fact you still think this is a viable “policy” when the same Whites sucking off the govt tit will turn on NSN etc when the welfare tap is turned off (transitioned as you put it like a tranny) truly shows how stupid and short sighted you are.
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
1Antonius
3 days ago
People are too degenerate to play moderate with them. They’ll still betray you, it’s in their nature.
0 likes
Report
leibekohne
6 days ago
therefore NSN you must stop drinking even beer drink Kombucha instead. Never slacken be vigilant You must be hard, strong without any remorse and it will require blood, because you waited to long, because you let yourselves your parents to be fooled whilst the internal enemy never stopped only intensified after WW2 He mesmerized us and made us imbecilic morons murdered us lied to us stole from us killed us used us exploited us destroyed us to merely 6% of world population and going down faster and faster to total distinction of Aryan goyim white race wake up shiksa cunts and fight; teach abusive fanatical communist police a hard lesson, give it back.
2 likes

Report
MPCV
Supporter
6 days ago
o/ HH
2 likes

Report
JFurM
Verified
4 days ago
To your point Joel, on the study that covered the 33% drop in fertility of women who go the jab vs those that didn’t… as a woman who previous to Covid, had no fertility issues, I stared having lots of issues with my cycle as well as miscarriages as soon as the vax came out. My husband and I did not get it but most all of our family members did. This is an experience that many other women (not vaccinated) I have spoken with share in common. Potentially due to vaccine shedding and or what they’ve been putting in our water (I.e. Dr Ardis’ work shows this). Either way, agree with what you said about the massive wealth transfer that was going on during covid, and it eerily all began in nov of 2019. Very few people were talking about what was going on with all the major corporations and financial elites at the time. They definitely took advantage though to hurt us health wise, in our economy and as a society. Hopefully enough are awake now to not get fooled again! Great show!
2 likes

Report
Bigboy6669
5 days ago
bump
1 like

Report
palacepony
Supporter
6 days ago
Wuhan Institute entered a partnership with Peter Daszak/ Ecohealth Alliance. Special Cancer virus programs, ‘defense’ programs, theres beeb decades of work on G.O.F virus manipulation. See pizzapicklespur on X, also Charles Rixey (prometheusshrugged.org.) See Major Murphy’s release of the D.E.F.U.S.E document. Rixey will take you there. Research into Covid amyloidogenic properties continues @ mccairndojo.com. Support the doc; https://rumble.com/v6uyxpb-lab-updates-synthesizing-amyloidogenic-fibrin.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
6 days ago
https://t.wtyl.live/videos/browse?s=1
0 likes

Report
palacepony
Supporter
5 days ago
succinct overview; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OHBkkZeqms
0 likes

Report
TripleGas
Verified
5 days ago
need to kick out and block nons from entry before implementing anything like paying for mothers to stay home or it’s just another incentive for them to come and breed.
0 likes

Report
Kroninn
Supporter
5 days ago
Taiwan has around 2 million private gun owners. I dont think it would be too easy for China to invade them. Especially with the Philipines and others helping them.
0 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
4 days ago
Colac constitutional restoration conference in Colac upcoming late July; https://rumble.com/v6vqyl7-2-seminars-26th-27th-july-augusto-zimmermann-darren-dixon-and-tim-dwyer.html
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Trump is not American either. His mother is from Scotland. And his father could be a German jew if you look at Fred Trump’s physiognomy. Trump is also a New Yorker.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Trump is not founding stock American like us that have been here since the 1600s.
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Israel sucks at colonization. Look at a settler colonial nation that was White, and had no outside funding. America, Australia, Canada. Jews have all the money on the world and still can’t make a nation larger than new jersey.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
SSlieutenant
4 days ago
Jews are the laziest parasite bastards ever known. They should have listened to Hitler when he said they can live comfortably on Madagascar, but they resisted, now their final fate will be worse.
0 likes

Report
amacc14
Supporter
4 days ago
Democracy is fake and stupid. Listen to us, we’re sitting around, brainstorming how to get VOTES. Pathetic.
0 likes

Report
localsussybaka
4 days ago
The political analysis gets more compelling each day.
0 likes

Report
MattOosty
3 days ago
A stream/space with Karl would be amazing
0 likes

Report
PhooeyPhoxide
21 hours ago
Joel overrates the CCP. They can’t even take Taiwan. No way China is even going to put a dent in the New World Order.
0 likes

Report
BrossefStalin
5 days ago
Blair is so fragile. Always talking about how tired he is or how he feels weird. He had to get up early and it took him over the edge? Man up
-2 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live another episode of the show and to start us off. Superchat from Death Culture saying for the NSN war chest. And yeah, we’re getting straight into it. Big show for you this evening. Blair wasn’t around last week, so we’ve got a bit to catch up on. A lot to break down in international politics. Interesting, interesting stuff to cover.

 

There’s been a bit of a theme over recent weeks which is kind of going to continue into this episode.

 

But yeah, I want to reflect upon what’s happened in this Israel, Iran situation because on one level nothing happened, which was my prediction, but on a deeper level, something is going to happen, for many, many reasons, which we will get into in the broader situation. Interesting stuff as well in Australian politics. Mark Latham going to war against Chris Minns in New South Wales over these Hate Speech laws and the role of the jewish lobby and so on. Interesting to discuss that among other things.

 

But before we get into it. How you doing, Blair? You came for the show this evening?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, man! Got a lot I want to ask you. Get your take on a few things.

 

As you said, there’s been some international politics, which is not my favourite kind of politics, but I’d still like to get a comprehensive understanding. To get a bit of a Joel Davis take a series of Joel Davis takes on what’s been going on. But I’ve got an early start in the morning, that’s why., … Sorry.

 

Joel Davis: I was going to say you. It seems like you’ve had a bit to say about this as well.

 

Blair Cottrell: So, yeah, my takes are kind of, …

 

Joel Davis: Interesting to get your breakdown.

 

Blair Cottrell: I haven’t really had the opportunity to really read into it and develop a full understanding. I’m kind of just going with my gut. I’m surprised the way it turned out. Like Trump shouldn’t have been able to bomb another country and then two days later step in to supervise a peace deal with the country he just bombed. Like on paper that shouldn’t be possible, but he somehow pulled that off. He did that. I don’t know how Trump makes stuff like that work, but I don’t know. He’s an interesting individual. We’ve discussed that on previous shows.

 

But yeah, like I was saying, I’ve got a really early start in the morning, so I asked Joel if we could start a little bit earlier. That’s why we’re kicking off just after 8:00.

 

But yeah, lots to discuss. Should be a good stream. Where do we want to start now? Is Joel coming through blurry for anyone else or is that just me? I might have to have a look at my Internet connection here. We’re both coming through clear here. Or Joel’s blurry. What are you guys seeing at home?

 

Joel Davis: Not seeing much in the chat either way. Yeah, we got blurry. Yeah. Well, I think it’s a connection issue. One second. You can entertain the crowd.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s getting a little better.

 

Joel Davis: Entertain the crowd.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s pretty clear now. Warm up the warm up the device, I suppose. Man, it’s cold times down here in Australia. Middle of winter.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it has been cold. And on the subject of seasons, that was going to be one of the themes for the episode this evening for me, because one thing that I have learnt in politics, politics works by season. So, like, for example there’s been big riots and protests in the United States recently. I remember around this time last year, there were big riots in the UK, race riots. Because it’s the summertime in the Northern Hemisphere, those kinds of things tend to only happen in summer. Down here in Australia, it’s winter. During the winter time period, not much is happening politically, everyone kind of switches off, hunker down. And Australian politics generally, I mean, it’s not that eventful at the best of times, but it’s especially not eventful during winter.

 

And I think that’s true across the board. I remember last year, it did kind of feel like things were a little stagnant through the winter time. And then as soon as we got into the springtime, all of a sudden it was all action. There was just rallies all the time and controversies. And it felt like there was a lot of forward pressure into the summertime. You know, a lot happened on Australia Day and so on around then through the summertime, momentum built up and expressed itself.

 

Then there’s all these legal cases that are upon us and we move into the wintertime and kind of hunker back down. That seems to be how it works in politics.

 

So a lot of people are pressuring us:

 

“When is the political party going to be launched? When’s the political party going to be launched?”

 

Well, it actually wouldn’t make sense to launch it in the wintertime. Would make a hell of a lot more sense to launch it at the complete opposite time of the year when there’s a lot more energy and there’s a lot more vitality in the people and in politics.

 

So at the moment, we’re on our kind of winter kind of lull down here in Australia, but internationally things are kicking off. And yeah, I think the biggest story obviously is its the to and fro between Israel and Iran, which came to an abrupt halt. Obviously last weekend you had, remember looking at my phone, Sunday morning we had a Yuletide celebration and many of the boys, so we’re awake up, kind of like hungover from Yuletide festivities on the Saturday night, the winter solstice down here in Australia. We’re driving down to the servo and I pull my phone out and it’s like:

 

“Holy shit, Trump just bombed Iran!”

 

It was very quick. Like, it was like Trump announced it on Truth Social, his social media site, before anyone else touched it.

 

[06:13]

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you use that, Truth Social?

 

Joel Davis: It seems like only Trump uses it and maybe, I guess his biggest supporters.

 

But anyway, I had to go on his Truth Social and check, is this real? It was real. And he was, he kind of had this tone of like:

 

“All right, we’ve blown up the nuclear sites, this is done. If Iran stands down, we’ll just call it sweet, we’ll move on.”

 

And in the days since, you know, reports came out saying:

 

“Well, I don’t think they really effectively took out their nuclear program.”

 

Israel were talking a lot tougher. Even Trump himself was talking a lot tougher, talking about regime change. Iran were claiming they were going to have a big retaliation. Then Iran did a symbolic retaliation immediately. We’re getting a ceasefire, apparently. And Trump somehow even seemed to restrain Israel, which surprised a lot of analysts, where apparently there was a loose Iranian missile that was a bit late, just kind of missed the cut-off point for the ceasefire, allegedly, or whatever.

 

And so Israel sent all their jets. And then you see Trump coming out saying:

 

“Israel doesn’t know what the fuck it’s doing!”

 

To the world media, and making all these posts on his social media saying the Israeli planes can just wave hello and then they’re going to turn around and fly home. Don’t bomb anyone. We’re having a ceasefire. It was kind of interesting political theatre, but it managed to hold. And in the days since, it’s been kind of interesting. Trump has been very supportive of Israel, supportive of Benjamin Netanyahu, but at the same time ignores the intelligence reports that say that the nuclear sites weren’t properly destroyed. Says that’s all fake news. They’ve relaxed sanctions on Iran after the so-called ceasefire, but no negotiation seems to have taken place. There’s no deal. Iran has left the IAEA, which is the world leading kind of body or whatever for inspecting nuclear sites.

 

So what’s the solution here exactly? Like, it seems like the cans just being kicked down the road, but nothing’s actually been resolved.

 

Now, I personally don’t think it’s a problem if Iran gets nuclear weapons. In fact, I’m totally cool with them getting nuclear weapons. And I don’t think that it’s could be a problem that we deal with. But obviously from the perspective of Trump and the Zionists who control America, that’s a big problem. And from the perspective of Israel, it’s a big problem. So it’s kind of surprising to see that.

 

And a lot of people said:

 

“Well, how come that happened?”

 

And the reason why I was predicting that this kind of something like this would happen from the very beginning was not because I don’t think Zionists control America or I don’t think the jews have the levers of power. Quite the opposite. Obviously. The reason why I predicted this was because the United States has got more issues right now than just Iran and Israel.

 

Back in 2003, when the United States invaded Iraq, America was by far the world’s most powerful country. The richest, strongest. No one came close to the United States in 2003. And no one dared challenge the international order and their power and authority basically anywhere in the world. Like Russia and China totally like acquiesced to the invasion of Iraq and said:

 

“Okay, do it.”

 

So America was able to just break international law, do whatever it wanted, obviously at the behest of Israel at the time, and get away with it and just flush trillions of dollars down the toilet and deploy all its military, and nothing happened.

 

However, today it’s a very different global situation. You’ve got an active war in Ukraine, Russia’s committed there. And Trump came in to the presidency trying to come to some kind of peace deal there to neutralise relations with the Russians in order to be able to pivot to China, which is the real big deal. China is obviously potential superpower, a rising peer competitor of the United States. And there’s the issue of Taiwan, where if China moves on Taiwan, that could trigger World War Three, where the United States is obligated to defend Taiwan to hold together its position in the East Asian region.

 

Then you’ve got China versus America, two most powerful countries in the world. That’s World War Three. So what happens if America goes in and invades China, Iran right now? Well, they completely ruined their negotiating position with the Russians in Ukraine.

 

And they also are basically inviting the Chinese, like:

 

“Hey, why don’t you just invade Taiwan right now because we’re over committed and you’re never going to get a golden opportunity like this.”

 

So I think because of that broader situation, even though of course the jews who run America are no fans of Iran, there’s a limitation on what they can do. And I think that’s what we saw just happen.

 

And so the reason why nothing happened this time is because a much larger happening is on the horizon, I think it’s basically inevitable that a much larger war will occur over the next few years.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I was going to ask you. And you already answered the question I was going to ask you. Obviously this back and forth between Iran and Israel isn’t going to become a World War Three situation. It’s not a broad scale war. It’s kind of petty, a bit of a nothing burger. That’s what it turned out to be anyway. And you rightfully sort of predicted that, or not really predicted it, but you just called it for what it was before anybody else did, as far as I can tell.

 

So what is the World War III situation? Does that have to involve China and Taiwan? Is that your perspective?

 

[12:00]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, now if things flare up again between Iran and Israel, which seems inevitable because there isn’t much of a conclusion here to what’s happened, that could invite the Chinese in, they get to make a move.

 

Blair Cottrell: What about the other way around? If China tries something with Taiwan and America’s tied up in that, then I suppose hostilities could flare up between Iran and Israel again because they would expect the Americans to be distracted by whatever’s happening.

 

Joel Davis: Well, that would maybe play in Iran’s favour, you would think, because they would think, oh well, Israel’s now undefended. But what Israel showed, I think, in this engagement was that it has a military dominance over Iran, like of the two sides, the Iranians took a lot more damage than Israel. And there’s a thousand miles between two countries. Very difficult for either country to conduct a proper war with one another, whether there’s actually fighting on the ground, which is why historically Iran has been kind of backing Hezbollah and things like that. Groups that are actually bordering with the United States. Sorry, with Israel!

 

But it’s kind of like a sideshow. You know, the deeper and more profound reality is America versus China. And there’s two very interesting historians that have co written a few books together. One of them is dead now and what is coined as the Strauss Howe generational theory. I’ve been reading a book called the Fourth Turning, which was co-authored by these two historians in the late 90s. They have a kind of generational theory of American history where they say:

 

“Well, in order to understand history, you have to kind of understand it through the prism of every 21 years or so.”

 

Generations emerge and kind of swap social roles, whether they be the children, the young adults, the midlife types or the elderly.

 

And as each generational shift happens, there’s a shift in mood and a paradigm shift basically in the overarching society. And they plot this onto Anglo-American history. And what they find is that they kind of come in fours. There’s kind of like a cycle of four generations, which makes up the average kind of lifespan of a healthy human being. And how basically every kind of lifespan every 85 years or so in American history, or even going back into British history prior to that, you get a crisis.

 

And so you had World War II about 85 years before that you had the Civil War about 85 years before that you had the American Revolutionary war about 85 years before that you had the Glorious Revolution in Britain where Stuart monarchy was deposed. And there’s a huge paradigm shift at the time and so on. And you keep kind of cycling back and finding these parallels. And so according to this theory, which is eerily accurate in a lot of its predictions and its analyses, basically now between the next few years is supposed to be the kind of crescendo of the crisis point where something like a World War II or Civil War type level happening is supposed to occur in American history.

 

And at the same time as you have this theory, there’s also many theorists of war history who describe how you have these 95 to 100 year cycles, roughly speaking, that occur between kind of wars that reset the global political order that have been occurring every 90, 95 years or so throughout European history.

 

And again, we’re kind of reaching that point where the next, …

 

Blair Cottrell: So we’re overdue.

 

Joel Davis: Well, we’re basically, if it happens soon, we’re right on time. We’re right on time. And it does feel like there’s this kind of air of inevitability where you know, you have something called Thucydides Trap. Thucydides was an ancient Greek historian. He wrote about Peloponnesian War. He wrote about the war between Athens and Sparta.

 

And basically you have this situation where this tendency in military history and political history where you’ll have a dominant power in a region or in this case in the world that’ll enjoy after a great victory in a major war, a period of dominance.

 

And then eventually they’ll have somewhat of a decline and a new challenger will arise, a new great power will arise, and the status quo that was kind of set up under the dominance of the original power will eventually be challenged by this emerging new power because they’ll become too powerful to basically accept the subordinate position. And when this occurs, it’s basically inevitable that these two powers will go to war. And it’s almost like all throughout human history, you see this happen again and again and again and again!

 

In the early 20th century, you saw basically the dominance of the British Empire, the rise of Germany. They challenge one another. America ends up inheriting the position of the British and finishing the job. But you see this time and time again. And that’s obviously what’s happening now with China, where in the last, you know, few decades, China has become so wealthy, has had so much growth, and they’re building incredible amounts of military hardware, their navy’s swelling, all their tech is developing very rapidly, like military tech. And from the Chinese perspective, Taiwan is part of China.

 

In fact, from, even from the American perspective, technically, Taiwan is part of China. Everyone agrees because Taiwan was actually controlled by China. After the Second World War concluded, where you had an alliance between the Nationalists and the Communists to fight the Japanese in China. The Nationalists and the Communists started fighting one another. The Communists won. The Nationalists basically were pushed back onto the island of Taiwan and they basically were stuck there ever since. And the Americans initially protected the Nationalists from the Chinese and had the ambition perhaps of like, reinvading China and putting the Nationalists back in power over the Communists, but that never happened.

 

And so basically it’s like this Chinese civil war that was never fully resolved. So from China’s perspective, like America deciding it would be like imagining if we had a war in Australia between the Left and the Right, and then the losing group had got exiled to Tasmania, we would still consider Tasmania part of Australia. Whoever won would want Tasmania back. And if then America.

 

[19:18]

 

Blair Cottrell: How did China end up losing control?

 

Joel Davis: You’re not allowed to invade Tasmania. That’s against the rules. We would be like, cool. Like fuck you!

 

Blair Cottrell: But how did China lose Taiwan in the first place?

 

Joel Davis: Well, the Nationalists, Taiwan is controlled by Chinese people as well, but they’re just the Nationalist group that were pushed out by the Communists. But they’re ethnically Chinese.

 

Blair Cottrell: Exclusive political structure.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but like, Taiwan has been conquered by other powers throughout history. Like, it was conquered by the Japanese at one point, it was conquered by the Portuguese at one point and so on. But Taiwan is more or less Chinese.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I had a couple of feelings regarding Donald Trump. Just paying attention to his body language, his speeches.

 

I feel like he has Israel fatigue. I feel like Trump is kind of fed up with Israel. And someone in the comments triggered that thought in me. I noticed that in Trump. I noticed that in his demeanor. It feels like he’s annoyed by Israel. He’s sick of Israel, but he doesn’t really openly admit it. He’s still playing the game, but he definitely seems frustrated. More frustrated with Israel than he was by Iran, I think. But he’s still trying to make it seem like he’s kind of equally annoyed by both of them, probably a little bit more by Iran, because nuclear bombs or whatever.

 

But I also got the sensation that isn’t Donald Trump just a stereotypical merchant? I’m not saying nations should be at war with each other, but it is a natural thing. And Trump mentioned many times, why can’t they just go back to trading? They’re excellent trading. Iran great trading. Not traitors as in betraying, but trading like buying and selling.

 

And it’s like a merchant, the big international merchants stepping in and saying:

 

“Hey, guys, stop killing each other. There’s money to be made. Don’t you guys want to make money? Let’s just keep trading and getting rich. Use your population to generate more wealth and start trading those resources. Why fight for something you believe in when you can make money?”

 

That’s kind of how it felt, right? They were the feelings that I had observing Trump’s reaction to this whole debacle between those two nations.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I think that’s an accurate assessment.

 

Also, Trump does have this tendency to kind of do some big individual military action, like where he does like a big, well publicized bombing or something, and then goes, all right, let’s negotiate a piece. Trump is very averse to long drawn out wars.

 

But I think it’s also because I think Trump and his people are aware of what I was describing about China. And their entire strategy seems to be trying to get the affairs in order of the empire broadly, so that they’re able to focus on the threat of China, because that’s why Trump is going easy on the Russians and why he’s trying to come to the table with Putin and make a deal where Biden was not looking at doing that. Not because Trump is some Russian agent or something. I don’t think you could argue that he’s a jewish agent, but you can’t argue that he’s a Russian agent. I don’t think there’s evidence for that.

 

But the reason why he’s doing that is because of pragmatism. It’s just simply the assessment that if you’re going to go to war with China, you don’t also want to have the Russians on the side of the Chinese against you and fight on two fronts. You’d rather neutralise the Russians so that you can take on the Chinese directly. And that’s kind of what he’s trying to do. He’s trying to kind of change the state of play. And Israel is just a thorn in his side because Israel is just focused upon Israel’s narrow individual interests,

 

Blair Cottrell: Ethnocentric interests.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course, of course. And for Israel, this is a golden opportunity. Israel have been pretty successful in their conflict with Hamas. They were successful against Hezbollah in their recent battle. The Assad regime fell in Syria.

 

So all these dominoes are falling all around them. And it’s like, now there’s. Now they’ve got the chance to go and try and force the issue on Iran. They’ve got their guy Trump in office who they think they can get something out of because they’ve got leverage over him. He’s embedded in all these jewish power structures.

 

You know, I remember when we talked about it on the show a few weeks ago when there was discussion about Trump and Epstein, because it was brought up. Oh, what happened here?

 

Blair Cottrell: You lost your camera by the look.

 

All right, well, I’m expecting Joel to be back momentarily. Here he is. Seems to be having some technical issues, and I’m not sure I have. The mental acurity. Is acurity a word.q

 

What I’m trying to say is I don’t believe I have the necessary knowledge to follow on with that point. I just can’t see your face. I can hear you, but I can’t see you.

 

[24:33]

 

Joel Davis: What the fuck is going on? One second. Yeah, it’s mental acuity.

 

Blair Cottrell: Acuity. Right, right. I always have the right word in my memory bank. But A, I don’t actually know what it means, and B, I often mispronounce it, but the word is in the bank. It’s the strangest thing. It’s like well, why do I know the right word to use if I can’t even be sure of what it means? Words often sound like what you want them to mean. What I mean is words mean what they sound like they mean. Have you found that with English? That’s what I think.

 

Anyway. What I’m saying is sometimes I’m thinking and the right words just come to me and I don’t know why that happens. Sometimes I don’t even know what they mean. And that’s an example of that right there.

 

But anyway, you’re back now, so continue. What was it you were saying?

 

Joel Davis: Oh, what I was saying was that this was discussed when Elon Musk had his flame out against Trump a few weeks ago and then mentioned that:

 

“Well, why do you think the Epstein files haven’t been released? Well, it’s because they implicate Trump.”

 

Or whatever it was that he said. I don’t remember the words exactly. Well, there’s something to that because Trump and Epstein were like best buddies from the late 80s to the early 2000s. All these videos of them partying together.

 

In fact, Epstein even described Trump as one of his best friends in an interview in the 90s. Trump said many great things, positive things about Jeffrey Epstein, including:

 

“Jeffrey Epstein. You know, he’s got a he loves the women, particularly those on the younger side. He’s a lot like me.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that what he actually said?

 

Joel Davis: Something like that. Okay, yeah.

 

I can’t remember the exact quote, but it was something words to that effect. I can look it up.

 

But the reason why they fell out in the mid 2000s. I shared a really good post on this by Devon Stack, also known as Black Pilled, was because Jeffrey Epstein was trying to buy some mansion in Florida somewhere like Palm beach or something, and Trump outbid him and got the place off him. And it ruined their friendship. Jeffrey was pissed off that Trump screwed him on some deal, took this place that he wanted to buy. And they fell out because of that. Not because Trump realised that he was a pedo or something or that he was a Mossad agent. Trump’s family have been long time friends of the jews. His dad was massive business partner to the jews. All kinds of awards from the jewish community in New York and guys that were doing the whole Jeffrey Epstein thing before Jeffrey Epstein were close friends of the Trump family and so on.

 

So this connection between Trump and Israel goes beyond just money. It wasn’t like Trump just got bought out by Zionist owners. The connection goes much deeper and much further.

 

But my point being that, yes, even though Trump is a massive philo-semite and a supporter of Israel. You know what Israel are asking for at the moment is go and start a war that could potentially destroy the entire American empire. Because we would like you to. It’s not actually necessary. Like if Iran gets nuclear weapons, they’re not going to use them against Israel unless Israel shoot them at them first. Like Israel has 200 nukes. Like Iran’s not going to just start lobbing nukes crazily at Israel and get itself nuked into oblivion just because they’re angry anti-semites or whatever the fuck they’re saying.

 

Blair Cottrell: It would give Iran leverage obviously though, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it would basically protect them. It would deter Israel or America or whatever from fucking with them in the way that they just did, but to a larger degree in a way that could actually destabilise the regime there. So it’s just an act of self defense the fact that if they were to build nuclear weapons, so it’s ridiculous!

 

And then Israel’s complaining about Iran not following certain protocols. Israel hasn’t even formally acknowledged that it has nuclear weapons even though it has 200. Everyone knows that they have about 200 nukes. Those nuclear weapons were illegally stolen off the United States. There’s a lot of, is a lot of credible evidence that the reason why JFK was assassinated was because he was trying to stop Israel getting nuclear weapons. He was an opponent of their nuclear program. He didn’t want them getting nuclear weapons. And then look what happened to him.

 

And then Israel is not a signatory to the non-Proliferation Treaty. Pretty much every country in the world in the 60s and the 70s there was a decision made, okay, we’ve got to like stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons around the world. Obviously it was a bit of gate-keeping by the Soviet Union and the United States, but they were saying let’s stop, let’s shut down nuclear testing. This could be really bad for the environment. It slowed the proliferation of nuclear weapons and most of the countries in the world have signed up to it. Israel never signed it and Iran did. Iran has signed it.

 

So they’re trying to hold Iran to account for rules that they refuse to adhere to. It’s just insane! Like it’s the chutzpah of these kikes. So it isn’t necessary. Like from Israel’s standpoint they’re just greedy. They’re just like, they can see their enemy is in a weak position. They’ve knocked out a lot of its or kind of defeated groups like Hezbollah. They’ve knocked out Assad’s regime in Syria, which is an ally of Iran.

 

[30:17]

 

And so now they’re just trying to take a swing for the throat or they think they’ve got a chance. And Trump’s like:

 

“Fuck! Like, this is the last thing I need right now!”

 

He had like 5 million people in the streets protesting his presidency the other day. There’s the beanner anti-deportation riots happening. This happens. And then so many Trump allies, like Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon and so on, come out against Trump, against the war.

 

And a lot of the base, a lot of the people who support Trump, like what Tucker Carlson is saying, like what Steve Bannon is saying, like what even further Right commentators, people like Nick Fuentes, whatever, what these people are saying, Alex Jones. A lot of big commentators in the United States came out against this and the people were with them, particularly young people. So, it’s politically a disaster for Trump, but then also it’s geopolitically just like the last thing that they need right now.

 

And then, not to mention economically, like, if they went to war with Iran because of what it would do to oil prices and so on, it could completely fuck up the economy in a very serious way. So there’s just like this cascading set of crises that would be unleashed by it, which is why he was keen to just try and get it over and done with and move on and re-establish the status quo that previously existed. Because it’s kind of like a nightmare situation, no matter how much he loves Israel.

 

And I think that’s why what happened, happened. But it will probably flare up again before the end of the year because Israel is going to force the issue. Iran, I mean, they’re probably trying to make nuke secretly now. I saw a good article written by someone, I can’t remember who it was. I sent it to you like the other day.

 

Blair Cottrell: I know you did. I know which one you’re going to reference.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, like the one saying, obviously Kim Jong Un and the North Koreans have indicated, just build your nuke secretly and then test them and then flex your muscles because no one will touch you because North Korea’s got a bunch of nuclear weapons pointed at South Korea. Matter how much international condemnation there is of their regime, people just accept that it’s just, it exists and there’s nothing you can do about it. And that’s probably what Iran should do and what they’re probably going to try and do.

 

And apparently they’ve still got some of the reports that came out were saying that they’ve still got a lot of enriched uranium hidden somewhere, that they’ve still got reactors hidden, like hidden in other places that weren’t blown up, or that the Fordo site wasn’t destroyed properly, etc, etc.

 

So what happens in three or four months when the Israelis and other war hawks for war with Iran start leaking things to the press saying Iran are building nukes and they’ve rebuilt one of these nuclear sites or whatever? Like, Trump can call it fake news now, but, like, he probably will respond to that kind of pressure.

 

And so then what if, you know, Israel kick it off again, then what? Seems hard to imagine this situation would just magically go away.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you think jewish people have overplayed the Holocaust card? Because I noticed that Netanyahu, in his speech justifying his initial attack on Iran, he said something to the effect of, we can’t allow Iran to nuclear Holocaust us. And then I read an article that was published by Sky News from the, I believe, CEO, who was it? The CEO of the Australian jewish association or something? I think it’s probably just a guy at a desk. It’s nothing serious. But he was published by Sky News. And in the article, I’m pretty sure he mentions Holocaust like five or six times. And I’m thinking, and I didn’t actually read the article, I just wanted to count how many times he mentioned the Holocaust. And I’m thinking, am I the only one doing this, or am I the only one so worn down by the overuse of the Holocaust term because of the politics that I’ve been into? Or is everyone starting to feel this way? Is everybody starting to notice? I don’t know if this is something that people could relate to, but it’s just the justification for everything.

 

Remember that journalists, the Australian journalist, I think he was from ABC perhaps, who interviewed that spokesperson from Israel and said:

 

“So Israel is allowed to have nuclear warheads because Holocaust?”

 

And the spokesperson got really offended and actually walked out of the interview. He’s like, you’re being disrespectful. I’m not doing this interview, right?

 

So I can’t be the only one that’s noticing it. If even ABC journalists are noticing it. Like ABC journalists, I think, are notorious Leftists in Australia. People don’t like them very much. They’re generally very politically biased and even they’re sick of Israel. Jewish people just using Holocaust to justify everything and anything. What do you think? Do you think the general public, the population, do you think for them the Holocaust is starting to become a bit of an eye roll.

 

[35:14]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think you’re seeing it more with Leftists. They’re dismissing the Holocaust. Not that they’re not denying that it happened part. They’re dismissing it on the issue of Israel. I saw a clip from, I think it was Piers Morgan show and Piers Morgan has kind of been inviting on, he’s kind of seeking out controversy with his show. He’ll invite on people that will often debate the Israel-Palestine issue from both sides and he’ll try to interview like Andrew Tate or people like that because he’s going for clicks.

 

And anyway, I can’t remember who the jew was, but they had Anna Kasperian, I think her name is. She’s on the Young Turks program. She’s like Left leaning, like Bernie Sanders, supporting Democrat, but obviously she’s anti-Israel. And her rhetoric. I’ve noticed, I’ve seen quite a few clips from her and she’s a pretty popular commentator in the United States on the Left. Her rhetoric has gone to like full on like ZOG, like it’s a Zionist Occupied Government. Israel control our government. It’s not just, oh, these Christians and White supremacists hate brown people or whatever or these crazy Christians with this insane biblical theories about Israel. It’s like a direct, like Israel, the Mossad, they control our government. What’s going on with Jeffrey Epstein, you know, blah, blah, blah. Talking points that you would hear on the far-Right from people that we associate with. Right on that specific issue.

 

And anyway, the jew, she was debating about whether what’s happening in is in Gaza constitutes a genocide or something like that. He brought up the Holocaust and he’s saying this is not a real genocide. Real genocides are like the Holocaust. Like that’s a real genocide and that’s what happened to our people. And she was like, shut the fuck up! I’m sick of hearing about the Holocaust. How you guys just keep using that. I don’t care about the fucking Holocaust anymore. You’re doing a fucking genocide now! And that’s kind of interesting. You’re seeing that sentiment more from Leftists.

 

And then at the same time was a great exchange between Senator Gerard Rennick and some jew on Twitter that I posted a screenshot of the other day. The jew said:

 

“My family was wiped out in the Holocaust and for over 2,000 years my people were persecuted everywhere they went!”

 

Blah, blah, blah.

 

And then he just kind of shot back with:

 

“I have Celtic heritage. We’ve been persecuted for 2,000 years since the Romans touched us up. Did we go on about it, no, no one cares about your claims of 2,000 years of persecution!”

 

So it was nice to see Rennick fire back too.

 

And so you’re seeing more emboldening from people that are., … Because the anti-zionist, anti-Israel position is now becoming dominant. Basically people under the age of 40, people who get their politics primarily from a media diet of social media rather than mainstream media. Most people are anti-zionists, whether they’re Left-wing or Right-wing. It’s the only thing both sides can seemingly agree on at this point is fuck Israel basically. And yeah, so I think you’re onto something with that. I don’t think the Holocaust is really kind of maintaining the same kind of mystique that it once had.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, I mean, I’m seeing people who I know, clients, relatives of clients. Like I’ll be in the middle of a job and one of my clients will say:

 

“Oh, my brother just sent me this.”

 

Because we talk about politics in a light hearted way.

 

And it’s like a meme, you know the Jaws movie, how there’s a picture of the shark kind of looking up at the I think it’s a woman, or a man swimming on the surface of the water and someone’s just changed the shark to a giant nose and it’s jews instead of Jaws. And he’s like showing it to me, laughing at me, sorry, laughing with me about it. And I’m thinking, this wouldn’t have happened five or six years ago. This is the sort of thing you would only find on Telegram five or six years ago. Now it’s just everywhere and standard people are laughing about it. This kind of anti-semitic meme propaganda.

 

So I’m not sure where that’s going long term.

 

However, I did have a thought. I believe it was yesterday or the day before. I started thinking about why we were censored from X. And I shared my thoughts with you on this briefly as well yesterday, I think. To summarize, I said if all this stuff is allowed on X, all of this, like Nazi material, anti-semitic memes and so forth, then why are we banned? Like, what does that say?

 

Basically, I realised that it’s probably part of a deliberate system to ban the options, because regular people, it’s always effective for regular people to start changing their opinions in favour of what we stand for. Obviously that’s effective, but it’s only effective up to a certain point because people, at the end of the day, they need to do something with that opinion, they need someone to vote for or they need a group to join, they need a party to join, they need to start paying a membership for an organisation, they need to get involved or they need to at least vote for someone who has a bit of a plan. But if they remove all the people with a plan, if they delete the options, then it doesn’t matter what kind of content people are exposed to. If they can’t do anything with the opinions that content is forming in their minds, then it doesn’t, it just doesn’t matter. It doesn’t actually translate into real or affecting real political change.

 

And I think that’s the whole point behind the censorship, at least. What do you think? Because you’ve got people like Nick Fuentes, they’re still allowed on X and there’s other influences and podcasters and so forth. But that kind of ties into what I’m saying, because what are they doing to affect political change? They’re sitting in a studio just talking shit, which is fine. It doesn’t really solve any problems, does it? It doesn’t give people options.

 

But anyone who comes forward as a real option, representing a real new nationalist solution, a new political party that’s actually going to challenge the two party hamster wheel in your respective country or region, then you’re banned, then you’re censored in clusters, all of your colleagues were involved, everyone LinkedIn gets banned at the same time, usually at the request of the hamster wheel two party system in your respective region. What do you think about that? Do you reckon that’s what’s going on?

 

[41:55]

 

Joel Davis: No, definitely, I think, yeah. Basically everyone who tries to set up a proper organisation, a party in particular, that people can rally behind, we all got mass banned only when we started making noise that we’re going to start a political party. And I don’t think that’s a coincidence. It was partly because we were gaining kind of lift off with popular resonance and things like that as well.

 

But yeah, you notice a similar thing in Britain. I’ve seen a similar thing, you know, where like all the Patriotic Alternative guys all got banned all at once when they had some successful public action.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s the thing, they’re an option. It doesn’t matter what people’s opinions are if they can’t vote for someone or join some group that’s presenting themselves as an option, a solution. So if the options are banned, I think that’s the game. So everything just becomes content for the sake of content where you’re just scrolling your X feed and you’re seeing all these great funny, Nazi, anti-semitic memes, but there’s no one you can actually, you can laugh with your friends about it and stuff, but you can still only vote for Liberal or Labor. There’s still no known organisation that you can actually join because you don’t know about anything like that going on. Because everyone who represents anything like that gets censored instantly.

 

And I think that’s the way censorship will continue to pan out moving forward. Plenty of memes, plenty of content, but you’ll just be expected to sit there drooling on yourself, consuming that content, and there won’t actually be an option for you, despite your changing opinion.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so they don’t mind people talking about the problems, but they don’t want anyone putting forward an actual solution.

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s changed though? Because they used to hate people talking about the problems. You used to be banned instantly for even trying to bring the problem up.

 

So why suddenly don’t they care about people? It might be that they’ve realised people need that option. And without the option, it doesn’t actually matter what people talk about or what they consume.

 

Joel Davis: I think it’s just that the ability for the powers that be to impose the level of censorship that they were getting away with a few years ago has declined.

 

There’s been a resurgence in the value of freedom of speech. They overstepped the mark. They started going after in America in particular, where all these platforms are run out of, they started going after conservatives, like main mainline conservatives that are not even that radical.

 

I mean, they banned Trump from Twitter for fuck sake. They banned like a sitting president from the platform. So they overstepped the mark.

 

And so then there was a course correction where the American Right asserted freedom of speech and asserted itself on these platforms. Elon Musk buys Twitter. They set up Rumble. The kind of information space gets shifted. Zuckerberg also kind of personally shifted more to the Right.

 

And so this TikTok which has run out of China, there was a changing landscape that emerged that these sites were forced to adapt to.

 

But at the end of the day, when it comes to Australia or Europe or even I think in America where I saw examples of this, like I remember when the National Justice Party existed in the United States, like they all got banned and then you couldn’t even post, like at this, at this point, you can’t actually post our website on Twitter.

 

But I remember that that was true for their website as well. So they really target.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s your White Australia website, is that right?

 

Joel Davis: Correct. White Australia.org or WhiteAus.org, both are banned.

 

Blair Cottrell: What happens when that party actually gets registered? Well, then can it still be targeted for censorship to that degree? Where we can actually be posted on a public social media platform where there’s millions of Australians are joined up to that platform.

 

I mean, they talk about election interference through social media, but that’s exactly what these social media companies do against anyone, you know, right of centre. Usually the greatest election interference is happening amongst X staff right now.

 

But yeah, as I said, it ties back into the sort of perspective that I had over the last couple of days that the whole agenda is to ban the options, is to let people just talk about whatever they want now. To give people the illusion of freedom of speech. But nothing that they can actually do with that freedom of speech that’s going to affect the course of politics in their region. Sit there and watch some streamer, say some stuff about Hitler and wring your hands together and feel good inside about it, laugh about it, get excited about it, but then you still got to go vote for red or blue.

 

At the end of the day, that’s all there is. Anybody else presenting anything else, especially nationalistic, in essence, they get nuked, they get censored, and I think that’s the way the system will slug on forward into the future.

 

[47:11]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I can imagine like say we have World War III against China. I could imagine the system being allowing a lot of anti-Chinese racism to profligate online and in fact encouraging it and having propagandists that frame the war in terms most amenable to people like you and I actually support a war with China. I don’t support starting one, but I support it if it’s necessary. I support trying to win if it happens.

 

Blair Cottrell: Obviously.

 

Joel Davis: And so that could be a good opportunity for us. But like there’s going to be times where, like racism is valuable for many reasons. Like they obviously allowed people like us to run amok on the site in the lead up to the last American election because they’re trying to get Trump in and they knew that the more swastikas and sunrads that were posted on Twitter, there’d be more votes for Trump with young people and it worked. So they try to channel racism for their own ends. It’s the most powerful force in politics. So it doesn’t surprise me at all!

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s the most powerful force in the world. Racism. Racism is kind of the precondition for the development of all living things, isn’t it? It’s like woven into nature that surrounds us. Like, racism is probably the most foundational reality of this physical plane where we live. It’s the basis for all life. You don’t see any magpies running around pursuing crows because they want to be more diverse. But yeah, I can understand that. Racism is obvious, obviously leverage, but it’s done in a smart way.

 

I don’t like to believe that I’m just playing into the agenda of American, you know, political brains, though. I mean, all I was doing essentially on X was, I suppose, supporting and trying to legitimize. I mean, I’m part of an agenda as well. I’m part of a political agenda. It’s quite obvious the agenda I’m part of I like to think that I’m part of a good agenda. I’m trying to popularise and legitimize the White Australia movement. Right. I believe that there’s nothing wrong with being a White Australian.

 

And I think that could become a popular talking point in the future, especially when White Australians start becoming a minority or when things get so bad that you can’t go down to a shopping centre without potentially being raped or stabbed by a coloured migrant from Africa. Already we’re dawning on that reality now.

 

So the agenda I’m part of, because I’m part of it. I’m not directly linked in, I’m not an active member, but because I’m someone with a voice people listen to and I was creating content to try to translate what you guys were doing for the ordinary viewer. Well, that’s enough reason for me to also be taken out with the rest of the guys in censorship. You know, it’s frustrating because you know what? I won’t get into it. I’m not going to sook about censorship because if I was in control, I’d be censoring my enemies as well, straight up. I wouldn’t be giving people ideas.

 

Joel Davis: Need to figure out how to adapt. That’s why it’s important that people clip and re-upload the show, for example, and re-upload stuff that we post. When Blair posts a video on Telegram or whatever, re-upload it on other sites, enable our voice to keep getting out there regardless. That’s invaluable to circumvent the censorship that we’re under.

 

But also we just have to adapt. I think building the political party will give us strong standing to get back on a lot of these sites and to normalise ourselves in.

 

Blair Cottrell: The thing that irritates me most about it is just the whole concept of democracy. I would be more satisfied with this whole ordeal if the Australian government, the people within Australian government just came out and said:

 

“Hey, we’re not allowing these opinions. We’re censoring certain opinions. We’re banning certain political ideologies. This is not a democracy anymore!”

 

I’ll be like, okay, at least I know where I stand. But they keep parroting bullshit and trying to present themselves as something that they’re not. You know, that they stand for these democratic principles that they don’t stand for. So they just lie to your face. While in reality there’s like counterinsurgency departments that exist purely to harass and censor political dissidents in this Australian democracy. And that’s what frustrates me so much, because you do your best to obey the law. You do your best to hold to the principles that you were raised to believe in the principles of being fair, diplomatic, you know, principle of free speech, not being violent, all that kind of stuff. You observe all of those rules, social boundaries and laws, and you still just don’t get any rights. It’s like you still just get censored, harassed, de-banked, followed. You get police knocking on your door, asking you about the political party you might be joining in the future. You know, it’s just a complete Police State down here in Australia.

 

And so it just pisses me off that they can’t just admit that that’s what they are. I suppose Chris Minns is the one who’s come closest to actually admitting it. The premier of New South Wales, he said that, hey, we can’t basically, can’t have free speech in this multicultural paradise because it might hurt feelings, and we can’t have that. So free speech is cancelled. He didn’t say it exactly like that, but that’s basically what he believes. I can respect that more than what some of those other assholes passing themselves off as politicians, whatever people’s representatives are actually presenting themselves. As actually still pretend that they’re living in some sort of democracy or are members of a democracy. There’s nothing Democratic about Australia. I don’t know. Do you agree, Joel? What do you think?

 

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, they pretend that we live in a liberal democracy.

 

[53:22]

 

Blair Cottrell: Before you chime in, sorry, I know I just passed it to you and I’m starting again. The real test will be whether or not you guys can actually register your political party and participate in this so-called democracy. You know, that’s going to be the real, the big reveal as to how free and Democratic this so-called Australian democracy is because I’ve got a feeling they’re not going to let you do it.

 

But with Chris Minns right now, I brought up Chris Minns, he’s under a bit of fire right now, isn’t he? Because his staffers have been called to account for their role in imposing new Hate Speech laws. Basically tampering with Australian law to make it more difficult to criticise jewish people. Changing vilification laws specifically I think all on the back of the caravan hoax.

 

But now his staffers actually refuse to show up to the initial inquiry, which they’ve got to show up to it I think if they’re summoned.

 

So the arrogance of Chris Minns’ office, the staffers in Chris Minns’ office has led to what I think might be potential arrests. What’s going on with that, Joel? Have Chris Minns’ staff has been arrested or are they going to be arrested? Do they have to come to court? What’s the next step there?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so what happened is that the, we talked about it on the show last week that there was the Legislative Council which is like the Upper House of the state government, they are doing an inquiry, an official inquiry into what happened because obviously the day that they’re passing these laws it’s coming out that this thing is a hoax and they’re ramming them through anyway. And we talked about it at the time.

 

Not only was it a hoax, it was literally paid for by foreign state actors, almost definitely Israel basically paying bikies to conduct false flag anti-semitic terrorist attacks to create a pretext to change laws to make it illegal to criticise jews or make it illegal for White people to criticise any minority groups basically in Australia.

 

Anyway, the role that Chris Minns’ staff has played is being subject to the inquiry because they’re alleging that they knew about it well ahead of time and deliberately concealed the fact that it was a hoax in order to ram this stuff through and only allowed it to kind of come to the surface after that successfully secured a passage through the state like the Legislative Council. Now it’s kind of become interesting because basically they subpoenaed them. They said you got to come and answer our questions. They refused to show up. They all refused to show up.

 

Blair Cottrell: So now it literally didn’t show up. They didn’t refuse. They didn’t write ahead and say:

 

“Hey, we’re not coming!”

 

They just didn’t even answer. There was just empty seats on the day.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And they’re still refusing to show up. So why, if they’ve got nothing to hide, why can’t they show up? Why can’t the members elected by the people ask them some questions about what they were doing? What are they trying to hide? Obviously something.

 

Blair Cottrell: And you know, Chris Minns was interviewed about it recently and he said:

 

“Disappointing, concerning and massive overreach for his staffers to have to actually explain why they tampered with Australian law on the back of a hoax.”

 

It’s disappointing, concerning and massive overreach to be held accountable for changing Australian laws on the back of a hoax. That’s what he said. Not word for word, but that’s what he was alluding to in an interview with a journalist. Imagine that. Imagine believing that you’re free from any accountability, that you can just pass laws based on lies and hoaxes behind the back of the Australian people.

 

And then when you’re held to account for it, oh, you’re a victim. This is massive overreach. This is disappointing. How dare you ask me to be to answer your questions. That was Chris Minns’ reaction and he’s been having a dig at Mark Latham too. I saw in a recent clip. Why is that? What role is Mark Latham played?

 

Joel Davis: So, yeah, I’ll get to that.

 

The bottom line is that they have no respect for law. Like legally they have to show up and answer questions if they’ve been subpoenaed. And they technically within the power to issue arrest warrants. They haven’t been issued yet. I think these things are being stalled because of the political connections between Chris Minns and the people that are ultimately responsible for issuing the warrants or not so Chris Minns is basically just trying to shut it down through favours and back room deals and so on. So we’ll see if that’s successful.

 

But yeah, the Liberal Party in New South Wales, they refused because initially guys like Mark Latham and some of the other Right-wing minor party members in New South Wales, they tried to push a motion to repeal the laws entirely in light of the revelations. The Liberal Party refused to help them do that. But the Liberal Party then agreed to doing an inquiry because Liberal Party knew it would create a shitstorm for Labor. Like what is happening now, which would be good for them in the polls but obviously they’re in the pocket of the jews. They don’t want to actually repeal the laws. It’s a typical Liberal Party where they pretend to be on our side but really complicit.

 

[59:01]

 

But anyway, obviously Mark Latham is Independent. He was on the One Nation ticket. He got kicked out of One Nation for rampant homophobia, for basically. Which was quite funny. Remember we talked about it at the time on the show like two years ago when yeah. He quite graphically described how disgusting anal sex is in response to some homosexual politician that criticised him.

 

So anyway, Mark Latham, he hates poofters. He’s increasingly seeming to hate jews. Well not really but you know he did call out the jewish lobby. He said that Chris Minns was emboldening the jewish lobby, that the jewish lobby has too much power and so on. And Latham is one of the front men of this inquiry along with the other Right-wing minor party legislative councilmen who are trying to hold the government to account.

 

And so it’s a bit of political theatre. Chris Minns is accusing Mark Latham of advancing nefarious anti-semitic conspiracy theories and so on. And Mark Latham responded on Twitter this evening to a clip of that posted by Australians versus the Agenda declaring:

 

“Chris Minns is his bitch!”

 

So that was quite funny. I guess he’s out for blood. He’s trying to take Mins down. He sees this as a political opportunity to take the hatchet to the knee of Minns and his government.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, now’s the time to put the pressure on. Minns needs to be exposed. He needs to be embarrassed.

 

Anyway, anyone can put the pressure on him now, they should do it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, absolutely! And at Mark Latham he recently got lost a court case for damages against this homosexual. I think he was from the Greens, Alex Greenwich, I think he was the member for Sydney. So he was voted in by all the Oxford street faggots into that position, I presume. Yeah, a judgement was held that he has to pay him half a million dollars in damages for just simply stating that anal sex is disgusting! What the fuck kind of country do we live in where it costs half a million dollars to offend a homosexual by declaring anal sex is disgusting!

 

So I think Mark Latham has a bit of a kind of punished aura at the moment. You know, 20 years ago he was the head of the Labor Party. He almost became prime minister. Now he’s getting tossed out of One Nation for being a homophobe and, basically getting bankrupted by the system.

 

And so what has he got left to lose? He might as well take on the jews. He might as well do some damage to the ruling elite while he’s still got a position. So good on him. I think it’s funny. Mark Latham defended The Noticer when they did a notice, a hit piece saying that Notice The Noticer is a neo-Nazi psyop, basically. And, yeah, he’s kind of flirted more with, like our guys on Twitter. Mark Latham’s a bit of a cuck on race, or more than a bit of a cuck. He’s a cuck on race. He’s not a true nationalist, but he does seem like he’s somewhat of a real human being.

 

And it seems like he kind of tried to be an establishment politician and kind of was chewed up and spat out through a long [word unclear]

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe the reason Latham’s not an ethnic nationalist is because he spent all his time around White Parliamentarians and he just can’t stand you know, [chuckling] so it’s pretty hard to believe in your own race when that’s the extent of the experience that you’ve had with your own race is White Parliamentarians. I don’t envy his kind of company. There’s another way. Latham, if you’re watching this, there’s another way. It doesn’t have to be Parliament.

 

Joel Davis: Well, actually, I’ve seen Mark Latham Fed post on Twitter when he’s had a few beers. He’s basically said:

 

“We need a revolution to overthrow a corrupt ruling establishment.”

 

And so on.

 

Blair Cottrell: So he must be there. He must be almost there!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it does seem, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It takes some of us longer to get there, but there’s no shame in that.

 

Joel Davis: It does seem like Mark Latham is, yeah, he’s kind of become alienated. He tried to do it all the right way, supposedly according to the rules of the old paradigm. He was a true believer in social democracy or whatever.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what happens! That’s exactly what I was talking about before.

 

Joel Davis: Now he’s a jaded, old goat.

 

Blair Cottrell: He would be sort of feeling the same frustration that I feel I suppose where you’ve been raised to adhere to these principles, you do adhere to them.

 

But then the same people who kind of claim to uphold those principles and stand for those principles, they just chew you up and spit you out through all sorts of underhanded tactics. He called me once when I was at the height of my activism, because he had a show I can’t remember what it was called. You might remember he had like a podcast or something going on.

 

I can’t remember what it was called. But I was just working on a job site I think in Eltham. He rings me and he goes:

 

“Blair?”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Yes.”

 

And he goes:

 

“Mark Latham.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“G’ day mate, how can I help you?”

 

And he goes:

 

“Yeah, do you want to come on the show?”

 

I said:

 

“What show is that?”

 

And he said:

 

“My show.”

 

 

And I’m just like:

 

“Can I call you back? I’m just in the middle of something.”

 

Because I was on a scaffold like trying to repair this eaves that was like hanging past the scaffold and like I was kind of balancing. But he seemed to get offended. He’s just like:

 

“Yeah, right.”

 

And he just hung up on me. Then I tried to call him back and he didn’t answer. I don’t know, maybe he’s having a bad day. But that’s the extent of the interaction that I’ve had with Mark Latham. He’s got grumpy bad energy. He’s got the grumpy old bad energy he does.

 

[1:05:03]

 

Joel Davis: But he’s kind of like one of the few politicians that actually has like red blood in his veins. The only time I was in, I never spoke to him one on one, but anything resembling a conversational context was him just ranting at a conference I attended a few years ago, ranting about how Julia Gillard was a lesbian, how her so-called husband is a beard, that he’s a homosexual himself and that faggots have taken over Australian politics and lamenting this fact, which was quite humourous.

 

But what Latham tweeted last week that kind of provoked things was him saying two jews on Sky News saying, quote:

 

“The fake anti-semitism narrative must stop. Might be better to stop legislating when New South Wales police say none of those arrested have anti-semitic ideology. It was a con job set up by mobsters. Minns emboldened the jewish lobby and now it’s out of control.”

 

So we’re seeing Australian politicians call out the jews probably for the first time I can remember in my lifetime having multiple Australian politicians call out the jews directly. It does feel like a bit of a sea change. John Lawson posted a picture of Mark Latham standing over John Howard and aggressing with his hands and like getting in his face. And Latham’s replying to that, he’s replying to other nationalists. Someone said:

 

“Wait a minute, is New South Wales politics actually getting interesting for a change?”

 

And he said:

 

“We ride to the sound of the guns!”

 

So Latham’s on the war path. He doesn’t give a fuck anymore! It’s pretty funny. Funny thing, these old politicians that got chewed up and spat out by the major parties kind of like turn. And it’s the smartest politicians. I think Mark Latham and Gerard Rennick are the two highest IQ politicians in Australia and they’re the two that are calling out the jews. So what does that say?

 

Blair Cottrell: They might, Rennick and Latham might want to read the chapter of Mein Kampf where Hitler explains what happens to someone with real ability who goes into Parliament. Not just someone with real ability, but someone who genuinely holds to principles, who wants to stand up for their country. You should read what Hitler has to say about people like that that go into Parliament and how Parliament just basically becomes a mob to destroy them and get them out. Because in order to survive in Parliament, you need to be a rat without principles! You go into Parliament with principles, they all basically unite against you to get you out. That’s essentially what he says, but he says it much more articulately, he writes it much more articulately than that you can read it for yourself if you want.

 

Joel Davis: But I love, though, how there’s this emerging kind of renegade like cast in Australian politics, which was previously quite boring and monotonous. We don’t agree with them on everything, but people like Latham, people like Ralph Babet and a few of these other guys that are kind of at least causing problems for the system, and that’s kind of our aspiration, I guess in politics is to kind of join the team and push things even harder and faster and further. The kind of outsider team of Right-wing disturbers and chaos agents, just going Joker mode.

 

And I think Aussies love that kind of thing. Aussies love an underdog, Aussie’s love sticking it to the man, all that type of thing. So I think that would actually make politics interesting to have a kind of cast of colourful characters, you know, engaging in that more in the years going ahead. And I think that’s probably what we should aim for on the Right-wing of politics is to develop that because that could be the kind of catalyst for meaningful change.

 

Because as I said, as the reason why I was talking about international politics earlier is World War III is on the horizon. It might not be next week, but it is on the horizon. And when that moment arrives, all bets are off. It’s going to be a total reset of politics. And after World War III is over, is everyone going to be focused on World War II anymore? I don’t think so. there’s going to be a whole new World War for everyone, for the whole world order to be rebuilt around. And the animating myth is going to be all the horrible things that the chinks did to us and so on, rather than how bad the Holocaust was. It’s going to be a total reset of the collective psyche.

 

Blair Cottrell: We are in post World War II fairy tale land, aren’t we?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but it’s time’s almost up. Like there’s almost no one alive that remembers World War II at this point.

 

And by the time World War III is over, there’ll be barely anyone alive who remembers it, but everyone will be remembering what just happened. And what would have just happened is a race war against the Chinese, from our perspective. We’ve got 1.7 million chinks in our country. They’re all going to have to be put in camps or something worse. They’re not going to be able to be trustworthy members of Australian society anymore. There’s going to be a division by race. I think it’s going to be a total reset of our collective values. We’re going to pretend that men and women are totally equivalent at wartime when we actually have to go boots on the ground in the hundreds of thousands and fight to the death? I don’t think so. I think everyone’s going to come back to reality. They’re going to have to, they’re going to have no choice.

 

[1:10:34]

 

And so this confrontation with reality is coming.

 

And so our job is at the moment is to try and get ready for that. Because a lot of people are black pilled because they think that the current paradigm, this kind of monotonous slow grind is just going to continue on ad infinitum forever. Nothing’s ever going to happen, nothing’s ever going to change and we’re all just going to go out with a wimper. That’s not how history works. That’s not what’s going to happen. There’s going to be a major crisis. Everything is going to get blown up and remade. All of our values are going to get reset in the coming generations. And the work that we’re doing now is setting the table for that next generation to eat. Like we’re getting things ready for the paradigm shift which is on the horizon.

 

So people need to think like that if we have a movement established, even if it’s just tens of thousands or 100,000 men and we’re only getting a certain percentage of the vote and we have one or two guys elected or something, we’re going to at least be in a position to make the most of the coming crises, to grow and gain influence and gain a seat at the table. We want to have a seat at the table at World War 3 from the Australian political perspective. We want to have a seat at the table because in order to conduct World War 3, as we said before, what’s the most powerful force in politics? Right? Racism! That’s the main force you’re going to be able to channel in the Australian people to get them to fucking fight. And we are the arbiters of racism in our country. We are the vanguard!

 

So we’re going to take on a very different role in our society from just being these hated, despised, controversial outsiders. We’re going to end up becoming, we’re going to have a completely different relevance in society in the coming decades.

 

So we have to get ready, we have to get building and time is running out. We need to get serious. The next few years, it’s indeterminate, when all hell is going to break loose. But it’s going to happen soon.

 

So yeah, and the Anthony Albanese’s of the world are going to get wiped away. They’re not going to survive. We’re not going to be electing gay nerds into office after World War III. It’s going to call for a completely different kind of politician politics in general. The whole social attitude will change. The men who come back from World War III are going to come back embittered, but also entitled. They just went and fought to the death for the future of their nation. Are they going to come back and just allow it to be fucking given away to women in pants suits and fucking Indians? I don’t fucking think. So I don’t.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think when all of that comes about, you’re a little bit frozen up, by the way, I can hear you fine, but your camera is just all frozen up. And it’s not just for me because I’m noticing someone in the comments mentioned it too. But watch all the other races in Australia and probably throughout other Western countries, watch them all suddenly be on their best behaviour when that situation with China that probably will turn into a new World War eventually comes around, because suddenly White people will begin to become more conscious of the fact that they are White and that they have their own ethnic interests at stake. And outsiders are going to become easier to recognise. Because with that basic introduction of the anti-Chinese racism that you say will become kind of a central feature of life during that time, you know, naturally we’re going to start recognizing other people who aren’t like us as well more easily.

 

And all of those arrogant Indians that are currently boasting about taking over certain regions in our country, all the Africans who are on home invasion sprees and murdering doctors in the hills, happened just last year. A young 17 year old was just convicted of that a couple of days ago in Melbourne. All of these people, I think will suddenly be on their best behaviour, and it’s going to be an interesting shift, interesting change.

 

I’m not overly excited about anti-semitism being a mainstream thing again because I know that that’s how things pretty much always were throughout the history of Europe, at least before the Second World War, leading up to the Second World War. Basically every country was anti-semitic as a general rule. I mean, Christians just generally understood that jewish people weren’t to be trusted. There was an understanding that jewish people weren’t generally friendly to Christians. I think that was mostly prevalent throughout Europe. And I’m sure there were times in some countries where that consensus, that understanding kind of became less prevalent and then something would happen and people would realise the reality of the situation again, because you’ve got times where kings in England, for example, like oh, now the jews are okay. And then 15 years later they’re kicking the jews out again. But the jews know how to live. They would have necessary, or how should I put it? They would have essential blood memories. So they know how to survive in environments where anti-semitism is rife. So I wouldn’t get too excited about it.

 

But it is exciting to consider what the world would look like, what Australia would look like if White people redeveloped a bit of ethnic consciousness. That’s what I’m trying to say, in essence. And that’s really all that I want to see in my lifetime.

 

I mean, I don’t really want for much. I would just like to die having seen a country filled with my own people who know who they are and know who their enemy is, who are able to recognise outsiders and threats. So I feel like I’ve died having served some sort of purpose, you know.

 

[1:16:14]

 

Joel Davis: Sure. I think for Americans the jewish issue is more central because that’s the kind of centre of jewish power in the world is the United States. And they exercise a lot more influence over American political and cultural life.

 

Blair Cottrell: That Zionist, that Judeo-Christian mythology, whatever you want to call it’s kind of popular in America, isn’t it? Maybe not so much as it was 10 years ago, but there’s still that, yeah, God’s chosen people thing going on.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, obviously there’s that. But even beyond that, just jews occupy a very prominent role in American life. Like, even though they’re like 3% of the population, they’re massively over-represented in media.

 

So if you’re watching podcasts, like there was the Leather Apron Club videos where he went through all the big podcasts, like all the big political podcasts, Tim pool, Joe Rogan, etc, etc. And he was going through them all and it was like a third plus of the guests on all these podcasts were jewish. Even though they’re only 3% of the population, they’re over-represented in the kind of tastemaking culture setting domains.

 

And so they have an outsized influence on American culture and political life, not to mention all the money that they’re putting in. And this is true on the Left-wing and the Right. It’s not just like the religious Zionists or whatever. Jews are more influential probably on the Left than on the Right in America in many ways, because just of how the majority of them are Leftists in the United States.

 

So that’s a big deal for Americans. And also primarily it’s the American military that’s getting dragged in to fight Zionist wars and so on. Like, we get kind of dragged along, but it’s kind of a secondary thing for us. It’s more primary for them. So it’s a more prominent issue for them.

 

But the reason why we did The jews Hate Freedom protest before Christmas last year, it wasn’t just because of the topical nature of that issue, which obviously it was primarily about, but it was because I think that’s the best way to frame the jewish problem to Australians in the current year, which is what is the jewish lobby primarily pushing for in Australia? The main thing that it’s pushing for always is hate speech legislation. And more and more attacks on our freedom of speech. Every single time anything happens, jews come out into the media and demand more arrests, more laws passed and so on. They want to shut us down. And Australians value freedom, and so they don’t appreciate this small minority trying to take away the freedoms of the rest of us because of their own hysteria and their own lack of ability to take criticism.

 

So I think that’s the strong frame and I think it’s a strong frame for Americans as well, I mean, there’s jews clamouring in the United States to take away their freedoms as well. And there’s nothing, there’s probably no value that Americans hold more dear than liberty.

 

So the kind of jews versus freedom framing I think is the best framing. You know, last week I criticised Sam Hyde for going on a podcast and trying to frame the problem with jews as:

 

“Well, look at the genocide that they’re doing in Palestine. Do you want to pay for that with your tax dollars?”

 

And it’s like, that’s probably convincing to like Leftists who sympathize with browns. But like, we should be talking about what jews are doing to us! Like how we are negatively affected by jewish institutional behaviour, not other groups. You know, who gives a shit about Palestinians ultimately, other than bleeding Leftists, not that many people or like Muslims, but like, who does the average patriotic White Australian care about themselves? Ourselves. So it needs to be framed in those terms. And you know, a lot of the problems that are occurring in Australia, they don’t boil down to jews. Like the problems with mass immigration and so on. Jews have played a leading role in advancing mass immigration and multiculturalism and so on. But it’s not just the jews.

 

Like, it’s a coalition of different groups, whether it be the housing industry, whether it be ideological Leftists and globalists, whether it be other, like non-White minority groups in their lobbying efforts or voting blocs or whatever. There’s a coalescence of anti-White forces in our society.

 

But on the issue of free speech, jews are playing a massively outsized and prominent role in attacking it. So on the one hand they try to portray themselves as:

 

“Oh, but you know, Israel’s a free liberal democracy. And if you oppose Israel, you’re allying yourself with these communists and Muslims who hate freedom and liberalism.”

 

And so you’re like some backwards, you know, fascist or something. That’s how they frame things. But it’s ridiculous! That’s such a weak frame. We need to smash through that framework and say:

 

“No, we’re on the side of freedom. You’re on the side of tyranny!”

 

If you’re not doing anything wrong, if the jewish role in society isn’t a problem, if what Israel’s doing isn’t a problem, why can’t we talk about it? Why can’t you just sit down and debate it and defend your position openly?

 

Blair Cottrell: Don’t you care about the Holocaust, Joel?

 

So what you’re saying in essence is anti-semitism is equivalent to the highest knowledge.

 

Joel Davis: What do you mean by that?

 

[1:21:49]

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m sort of like borrowing a Christian. I don’t know if it’s a Christian phrase or it’s actually from the Bible, says:

 

“Fear of God is equivalent to the highest knowledge.”

 

It’s true in religion maybe, but in politics anti-semitism is equivalent to the highest knowledge. You would think that you go into life thinking that any kind of prejudice any kind of stereotyping a person is just prejudice. And you’re not going to give yourself to that kind of brutal nature of thought.

 

But then the more you actually pay attention, you realise there’s a good reason for stereotypes, ethnic stereotypes in particular, and that there’s anti-semitism for a reason. It’s not just because people are idiots. It’s because people have observed the reality of a nature of a certain group of people for a very long time. [chuckling] It’s like that people continue to engage in certain practices, continue to behave in a certain way which leads other people to be somewhat hostile to them for their own purposes, which is usually a natural response.

 

So I think in summary, you could say that anti-semitism is the result of a lot of acquired knowledge. It’s not just some knee jerk reaction springing from prejudice or bigotry, as they try to frame it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the problems associated with the jewish community and its influence over our society, it actually requires like careful study and analysis. It’s not something which is like directly evident. I think people who have a more superficial view of society, they tend to not have very strong opinions on jews. They’ll be more upset at other groups that are more prominent and public facing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you hear? Well, that’s the point, isn’t it? That’s probably one of the reason the jewish people aren’t so prominent and public facing.

 

Joel Davis: I think a we’ve talked about on the show before. I think it’s a big mistake for them. They’re shooting themselves in the foot. They should shut up and retreat into the background. If they truly aren’t doing anything wrong, shut up and retreat into the background and allow us to have our race war with the Indians and the Chinese and the Muslims and all these other groups and retreat into the background and pretend to be on whichever side is winning, you know. [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: I do like the way like the standard jewish merchant that I’ve had dealings with in construction in the past. I do like the way they don’t flaunt their wealth. It’s one thing that the standard average jewish character from the southeast region of Melbourne, like Malvern, Elston, Wick regions, you would never know that they were wealthy. But they do tend to have access to a great deal of wealth. Like they’ll own big car parks in the city, high rise hotel buildings or family members of theirs will own that stuff and they’ll have shares in it kind of thing. But they’ll drive the kind of cars, they’ll drive a Camry and they’ll be wearing tracksuit pants and a T-shirt from Kmart or just some button up polo from Kmart. You know, they’re unshaven sometimes you don’t, you would never know. These are the way a lot of the jewish merchants around Melbourne operate, operate. And I kind of admire that because it at least is an expression of ego control to some extent.

 

Because when you think about it, the people who wear the big fat watches and lots of jewelry and drive around in like $200,000 Maseratis, what’s the point of that? What is the point in flaunting your wealth? What’s the point in wasting money on that shit in the first place? Like, what are you actually trying to achieve? Like:

 

“Look at me, I’m really rich and special!”

 

Isn’t that just ego fragility? Just that you’re trying to draw attention to yourself.

 

Joel Davis: So if you’re a billionaire Blair, you’re telling me you wouldn’t buy a fast car?

 

Blair Cottrell: I definitely wouldn’t. I would buy a nice Tiguan. I would buy a very nice Volkswagen Tiguan, because they’re a good reliable car and I would like a nice new, new sort of updated.

 

Joel Davis: I’d buy an Aston Martin. I’d buy an Aston Martin.

 

Blair Cottrell: You don’t want to be driving around in a car like that in the current climate though. You’re just going to, it’s probably just going to get stolen by Africans. I’m not saying that you shouldn’t buy nice things because they’ll be stolen by Africans.

 

What I’m saying is, …

 

Joel Davis: Put it in the garage! How they’re going to get?

 

Blair Cottrell: But why do you need it? Like this is what I’m talking about.

 

Joel Davis: I want to do 240km an hour down the highway!

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, but when are you going to do that? In the middle of the night when the coppers aren’t going to catch you.

 

Joel Davis: I’m doing 240. Good luck catching me. Plus, I got enough money to pay the tickets if I’m a billionaire.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right, [chuckling] but you’re gonna get sick of that eventually. I mean, okay, that’s a hobby. You’re talking about a hobby, but I’m talking about why would you, like, walk around in lots of gold chains, jewelry, …

 

Joel Davis: I wouldn’t walk around in gold chains.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like express your wealth? Like, what’s the point?

 

Joel Davis: I just would like to drive a ridiculously fast car, ridiculously fast. Because it’s fun.

 

Blair Cottrell: I get it. But again, we’re just talking about hobbies. If you had a lot of money, you wouldn’t. If you had a lot of, …

 

Joel Davis: I think jews are too neurotic, like:

 

“Oh, I’m gonna crash!”

 

Like, they wouldn’t even have the balls to go 240, you know?

 

[1:27:32]

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I gotta admit, I don’t know. I mean, what’s the point in driving 240 or just for the thrill rush. Man! What I’m saying though, is I think the jews, not all of them, obviously, but the majority of them, they must be raised this way. Or maybe it’s just part of their genetic nature. They do seem to have good outward ego control where they don’t flaunt their wealth.

 

But it’s probably all part of their subversive demeanour. Right? So you don’t really expect much from them. It is very true that you never really expect much from jewish people. When you deal with them on an individual basis, they always seem kind of nervous and skittish and you kind of feel sorry for them. That’s the impact they’ve always had on me. You kind of feel sorry for them and so you’re extra nice to them, because this is long before I ever really knew what I knew about jews. So I do admire that one element of their disposition, which is they don’t tip, they don’t tend to flaunt their wealth. And they’re some of the wealthiest people you’ll ever work with or for, if you’re in whatever industry that you’re in where you might come across them.

 

Joel Davis: I think the main thing to admire about them is that they invest a lot of their wealth in the advancement of their community rather than just the advancement of themselves as individuals.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s true.

 

Joel Davis: There are a lot of Anglo millionaires and billionaires, like multi, multi-millionaires and billionaires in this country who don’t put one single dollar into the advancement of White Australia, which is why the country is being stolen from us!

 

The jews are 0.4% of the population and their lobby is so aggressive and powerful because they pay for it. They put their community first as a group. And you know, meanwhile a lot of our richest people are fundamentally making money off our replacement. Maybe they’re working in industries that benefit from cheap non-White labour or if they’re in housing construction, they’re benefiting from mass immigration or whatever.

 

Blair Cottrell: And it makes your eye roll thinking about your parents, doesn’t it? I mean, I love my parents, but the standard sort of White Boomer parents, all they really think about is their retirement, is retiring comfortably and spending all the money or wealth that they’ve generated throughout their lifetime on themselves at the end of their lives. Which people watching this might think, good on them.

 

I mean, that’s the phrase they use in Australia:

 

“Oh, good on them. They should be able to do that. They’ve worked hard their whole lives!”

 

Yeah, I get it.

 

But when you contrast that kind of decision making process with what the jews are doing, with what the Chinese are doing, with what pretty much every other race in this country are doing, it’s kind of retarded to just blow all the wealth that you have generated through your working life on yourself and Martinis and cruises and fine dining before you die while your children have to inherit the mess that you fucking leave behind! I mean, you got to admit that’s pretty retarded, right.

 

I think being a bit more collectivist and having a little bit more foresight, generational foresight with the money that you make in your life, if you’re a Boomer, might serve your nation to some extent.

 

And that’s right, someone says in the comments:

 

“They taught our people to think as individuals.”

 

That’s the problem. And the Boomers can be really bad for that. Like I’m not an anti-boomer sort of guy. I’m a bit of a Boomer appreciater it in a lot of ways, because they do work really hard. They’re an industrious people. They’re always trying to fix things. They don’t like to relax, they’re always working. But they’ve definitely been geared to think on individual basis and that’s why all they seem to care about is their retirement.

 

Joel Davis: The Strausshowe generational theory predicts that Boomers and Gen-X’s will be more individualistic because Boomers grew up at a time of great prosperity. They grew up at the time after World War II, where you know, society was on high, institutions were working incredibly well. There were incredible opportunities. They’re highly idealistic generation that challenged spiritually the values of the old order because there was no crisis for them to really, like, confront in their lifetime. So their politics or their cultural involvement primarily became one of spiritual dissatisfaction.

 

Then you have the Gen-X’s who are like more jaded individualists, where the Boomers are idealistic individualists who want freedom and liberation and all this kind of stuff. And so they’re very focused on how they can enjoy their retirement and waste all their money on garbage rather than thinking about legacy.

 

Gen-X’s raised with very careless parents. There they were raised as kind of like a forgotten generation. They’re incredibly nihilistic and cynical because they were raised after the Boomers who had this great idealistic project that totally failed, and they perceived that. So Gen-X’s think it’s all bullshit! There’s nothing you can do to change the system. Just, you know, advance yourself as an individual as much as possible. Just make money and do what you got to do. There’s no higher purpose or meaning to society or life.

 

And so these are the two generations that are kind of running the show at the moment because they’re the ones with the wealth and the power and the influence. And they’re very individualistic for two kind of different reasons in terms of polarity.

 

But what the this generational theory predicts is that for Millennials, that we’re actually, … And by Millennials, they. Their cut-off point for Millennials is later than what’s most commonly understood. So older Zoomers are included in this.

 

[1:33:20]

 

Basically, if you’re an adult now, if you’re at least over the age of 21, you kind of fall in this category. For our generation, we’re a lot more collectivist because we were raised at a time of decline. Society has been declining. The generation that came before us were nihilistic. They didn’t really believe in anything.

 

And so we’re not really kind of reacting to a false idealism. Instead, we’re responding to a kind of society of excessive individualism, excessive nihilism, and instead have a kind of inclination to form for collective solutions rather than individualistic solutions. So where, like Gen-Xers say:

 

“Oh, well, you got no chance in changing the system. Just try and make money and be successful as an individual.”

 

Millennials tend to be more supportive of collective political solutions to our problems and say:

 

“Well, how can I as an individual succeed in a system like this?”

 

And so Millennials are far more predisposed to socialist economic policies, for example, and more collectivist political ideologies, whether it be on the Left or the Right, than previous generations.

 

So as we kind of ascend and become take over the system in the coming generational cycle, because we’ll become the older people that are actually in charge of the government and in charge of everything, basically, our values will start to get imposed on society and society will move in that direction.

 

So that’s another reason why I think the future of the Australian Right-wing is not going to be talking, it’s not going to be promoting conservative libertarian style policies around:

 

“We’ve got to cut taxes and we’ve got to reduce the national debt and people need to work harder!”

 

And all this kind of stuff. What’s going to motivate Millennials in the political space is redistributing wealth to our generation, giving us free stuff, giving us basically making up for the fact that wealth has been hoarded into the other generations, making up and kind of restructuring the economy. Collective solutions to individual problems rather than individual solutions to collective problems, which is predominant within Generation X. Like, Generation X thought that Fight Club was like the coolest movie ever, because Fight Club was all like:

 

“Society sucks, man! Let’s just go and like punch on in a garage and like blow buildings up and like have sex that’ll be awesome and get drunk.”

 

Whereas, like, they thought Nirvana was like the greatest band ever because they were like:

 

“Everything sucks!”

 

And they’re like:

 

“Whoa, that’s so deep!”

 

Whereas, like, Millennials are like, they don’t resonate with that kind of thing. Instead, Millennials are interested in, as I said, idealistic collective solutions, like, who is responsible on the collective level? How can we solve it on the collective level? Which makes sense why nationalism would resurge and socialism would resurge simultaneously within our generation.

 

So the future of Right-wing politics is a kind of nationalist Right-wing socialism. It’s not going to be small government, it’s not going to be doubling down individualism. Everyone is sick of individualism. Young people don’t want individualism. Young people don’t want to be told:

 

“Pull yourself up by your bootstraps, go talk to her!”

 

And all that kind of advice:

 

“Get it done!”

 

Blair Cottrell: The problem with individualism is you get too much of yourself under some sort of individualism or individualistic thought process system. You get too much of yourself and you get bored with it. You know we’ve had individualism, and look where it’s led individuals. Everyone’s on a plethora of script meds, sitting at home watching Netflix by themselves, paying off a mortgage by themselves, and just living in there in their honeycomb cell.

 

But I’ve got to bounce, man! I’ve got to bounce because I’ve got a really early start. I’ve got to get to bed.

 

Joel Davis: Can we do our four Superchats?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, if we’ve only got four, that’s fine. Yeah. Sorry, guys, if I’m sort of ending it abruptly, but I’m worried I won’t sleep tonight. And if I don’t sleep, I’m gonna have a really hard time tomorrow. I’ve got a bit of traveling to do tomorrow.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I was gonna get you to react to that Indian video, but fuck it! We’ll do it another time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I already watched it. The guy on your channel saying that:

 

“Hey, we’re taking over everything and we’re gonna marry your sons and daughters.”

 

Or something like that.

 

Basically, he was almost boasting that he was going to end up with like, all the Indians are going to get everyone’s sloppy seconds:

 

“You’re all going to get divorced, and then your divorced wives are going to get with us!”

 

He goes:

 

“Every Indian guy I know is with someone who’s not Indian!”

 

And I’m thinking, that’s not my experience. Every Indian I know is with an Indian. Well, it’s usually Indian men walking around in-groups looking for some girl to sexually assault. [chuckling]

 

But, yeah, it’s just your take on it that you posted on Telegram was perfect when you said that basically, what the guy is relishing in is the fact that in his mind, White Australians are destined just to end up in the same ethnic situation that he’s in.

 

Joel Davis: Well, you’re downbred into the genetic slop that he is.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was trying to say, in a way, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s his, like, ideal revenge is that:

 

“Oh, yeah, you think we smell and you think we’re disgusting and you think we’re a slave cast of Uber drivers. Well, guess what your grandkids are going to be half Indian Uber drivers, too, and you’re going to be down here in the fucking muck with us!”

 

Blair Cottrell: And there is a real vengeance, there is a real revenge sentiment amongst some of the Indians nowadays, I’ve noticed, isn’t there? Or just people who are responding to any sort of White nationalist talking point on TikTok or something like that you can see in their eyes, hear in their voice and you know, in their words it’s quite obvious that’s like they want vengeance. They want vengeance that they’re not White! They’re irritated that they’re not White! They’re irritated that White people are realizing that they’re White, recognizing the significance of that and starting to talk about it.

 

And all of these people are vengeful as a result! Let’s like, they don’t want that to happen. Obviously, it’s an existential thing. They’re worried they’re going to be sent back to their own countries, maybe.

 

[1:40:00]

 

Joel Davis: I saw a thread on Twitter by this Indian who posted. He said:

 

“Joel Davis, who hates Indians, well, he’s Irish and the Irish aren’t even White!”

 

And he thinks that he, … Anyway, I’m not even Irish, by the way. Full disclosure, I’m Scottish and English mixed together. Yeah, he was saying that apparently I’m Irish and then posted one of these those old like physiognomy charts from like the early 20th century where it showed like how the Irish kind of looked like niggers and being like basically, just like it was funny.

 

But then like, you’re not even White, you’re Irish. It’s like you’re a fucking pajeet. Like, even if I was Irish, you’re a pajeet! Like their main insult is like:

 

“Yeah, well you’re also brown. Like, you’re also a piece of shit! Like we’re both pieces of shit together!”

 

It’s not even like elevating himself up. It’s just dragging you down. It’s like when homosexuals try to like insinuate that you don’t like them because you’re secretly gay. It’s like, would that be insulting? Would me being a homosexual be something that’s disgusting and gross? Well, actually, I agree! It would be disgusting and gross if I was a homosexual. Interesting that you say that.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve said it before. It’s hard to be offended by, it’s probably because you can’t say anything to a White guy to a reasonably well bred White guy, which I imagine. Well, I like to think that you and I are reasonably well bred White men. What can you say to us? Like that’s a racial slur that’s actually going to irritate us. What can you actually say? There’s nothing! What am I going to get offended by? What are you going to call me Casper or pasty or something? Like, okay, I’m fine with that. There’s just nothing that can be said that’s going to like, suddenly make me realise that I belong to an ethnic group that I despise or I’m trying to distract myself from. I’m not trying to distract myself from my ethnic identity. You can only get offended if you’re actually not proud of who you are. If someone’s like using a racial slur, that’s the only reason you could be offended.

 

But yeah, like you said, there’s always just efforts to drag you down with these people. Let’s move on though, because I’m getting to the point where like, I slept three hours last night. I don’t even know how I’m running, like, how I’m still awake for some reason. I’m still going.

 

But yeah, I’m on three hours and I’m only going to get five if I go to bed right now. So we need to get through these Superchats.

 

Joel Davis: Well How’s it Going, said:

 

“Are you guys aware of the Australian band called Black Magic SS? They lean heavy on National Socialist imagery and themes.”

 

I am aware of Black Magic SS. They’re a doom metal outfit. And yeah, I think they’re pretty cool! Have you heard of them?

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. I’ve been to some gigs where bands like that have played. Are they Black Metal? I’m imagining they’re black.

 

Joel Davis: No, no, they’re not Black Metal. They’re like Doom Metal. They sound kind of like imagine if Black Sabbath was less pop sensible and kind of racist. More like mystique.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know if I’ve seen them. I don’t think I have. I’ve seen some Black Metal bands that are into that.

 

Joel Davis: Like, yeah, obviously there’s heaps of NS Black Metal bands, but yeah, no, they’re not Black Metal.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, let’s check them out.

 

Joel Davis: I think they’re Australian too, from memory

 

Blair Cottrell: Wiggle Do sends through $10. Thanks very much. He said:

 

“Lots of people want to be more racist than Hitler in NS circles. Where do you stand on Nuremberg Laws and mixed races? How do you draw the line between White and non-White?”

 

I think Joel’s mentioned this before in previous streams. It would come down to like organisational policy, I think, and different organisations would have different policies on that question. But I’m pretty sure the boys, Joel and the guys have their own policy on that, don’t you?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So it depends on the genetic distance. So like, if you have like trace amounts of like blood black, like African ancestry or Aboriginal ancestry. Less percentage of that can be tolerated relative to if you have like, I don’t know, like trace amounts of like Middle Eastern ancestry or Asiatic kind of ancestries because they’re less genetically different. So it’s dependent on the what the form of blood pollution, what percentage can be allowed. The Nuremberg Laws were primarily just about jews. And in my opinion they were if anything a little bit too lenient. So does that make me more racist than Hitler if I mean I’m Australian?

 

Rigo Weber said:

 

“Does the NSN have monetary incentives for White families to have more children? I think this should be a high priority for the NSN culture to develop, especially to replace all the mass deported.”

 

What do you mean? Do we within our own organisation pay people to breed? No! We don’t pay people to breed within the organisation. We do have so many people from, …

 

[1:45:14]

 

Blair Cottrell: What I can see there’s a lot of encouragement to breed.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Everyone’s having families. The reason why people aren’t having families is not so much about monetary incentives, it’s more about culture. If you have a culture that celebrates motherhood and you’re in a group of friends and associates where motherhood is valued and having children is valued, then the women pick up on that signal and go:

 

“You know what, I want to have kids too. I don’t want to be like some like sterile ageing, you know, wench, surrounded by all these fertile young women with all these babies hanging off their titties, you know, growing the next generation.”

 

So you know, if you develop a pronatalist culture, it kind of flows.

 

But in terms of like government policy, obviously when we put the political party together, one of our policies is going to be paying people to be carers for their own children. So like right now you have a situation where if you say you have a two year old, you’re a mother, you want to go back to work, the taxpayer, through the government, will give you a childcare rebate so the taxpayer will pay some Filipino immigrant to look after your kid in some child care facility surrounded by freaks and non-Whites and potentially pedos so that you can go and work because otherwise you wouldn’t be able to afford to work basically because you can’t even afford to pay child care costs for your own kid. That’s ridiculous!

 

But then if you’re a stay at home mom, you get nothing. It’s a completely perverse incentive. So what we’re going to do is reverse it and pay, fuck the child care rebate. If you want to go and work, you got to figure out who’s going to look after your kids if you can’t.

 

But if you’re going to look after your own kids, the society should pay you. We a collapsed birth rate, we need to have more White babies, we need to have more young Australian babies. And so we’ve got to make it economically viable for young families to have children.

 

So that’s going to be one of our signature policies. I think it’ll be very popular. I think women will like it. I think young men will like it too, because it takes the pressure off them too. If your missus is getting paid big money to raise your kids well, then raising a family on a single income becomes possible again. Say she’s getting 70, 80 grand a year from Centrelink and then you’re out making 100 grand a year or whatever. Now you’ve got a decent income so you can make a life for yourself.

 

Catenaria said:

 

“What are your thoughts on human rights? The right to life, liberty, security, freedom of speech, assembly and expression. Are they inherent and universal? Should they be protected?”

 

I don’t believe human rights exist. They are not inherent, they’re not universal, they’re social constructs. Should we construct them within our societies is a different question. I think within White societies, the maximum amount of freedom that can be apportioned to your population without compromising the security of your nation, should be afforded.

 

So I don’t think we should give freedom to communists, to traitor elements within the society, to, or definitely not to foreigners, alien foreign interests in our society, trying to subvert it and undermine it. But I think normal White people should have freedom of speech and assembly and expression. Absolutely!

 

So, yeah, but they’re social constructs, which means that there’s nothing universal inherent about them. They were dreamt up in the 20th century. No one ever thought they existed before then, because they don’t. They’re just phantasms of the mind. They’re ideological constructs, they have no metaphysical basis.

 

Blair Cottrell: Obviously, that’s true. But perhaps the essence of the question is, would you maintain any sort of semblance of human rights, like, let’s say you get everything you want and you’ve got a White ethno-state. Would you keep the concept of human rights, like, woven into Australian law, or would you?

 

Joel Davis: Not human rights. Not human rights. But I think having rights for the Australian people, specifically the White Australian People, they should have rights. We should guarantee their rights. But enemies of the nation and foreign alien interests should not have rights. Fuck you! Go create your own country somewhere else and get them to give you rights. Our government is responsible for securing the rights of our people, not anybody else. And we could make. And we could respect the rights of like all White people, let’s say with got cousin nations around the world and we can respect their rights and they would respect our rights and things like that. But it’s a construct, it’s a decision, it’s not an absolute!

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d be more concerned with conducting myself with dignity and strength rather than arbitrary concepts. Abstract concepts like rights to life, liberty, freedom of speech. These are all very, I don’t know, you’ve got to understand that when you have concepts like that that are available to everyone in a specific country, then that country becomes receptive to external threats, subversion. People are going to use those rights against you. They’re going to get into your country and they’re going to use that shit against you. So that’s a problem. There’s a bit to unpack there.

 

But this is the kind of thing that you sit around a table with some other very learnt people and you discuss where the boundaries, where you’re going to draw the line with stuff like this, and how you’re actually going to define your state form. Because I don’t like concepts like the ones that were enshrined into the basis of Australian democracy. You know, the ones I grew up with, as I explained earlier in the stream. Because they’re all bullshit! And they’re just used by enemies of our country to subvert and exploit our country and extract the wealth generated by the Labor in our country and send it overseas and you know, get up to all sorts of mischief in the process. To the extent where our children. The greatest thing our children contend with in public schools is:

 

“What gender am I?”

 

You know, all of this has been the result of freedom of expression and human rights and stuff like that. Right. That’s just opened the door for all manner of subversives to come into this country and work their bullshit magics. So like I don’t go for that kind of stuff. But I do believe in honour, dignity, being fair. I believe in harsh punishments, but fair punishments nonetheless. I believe in consequences, that kind of thing. But as I said, there’s a lot to unpack here, isn’t there?

 

[1:52:21]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I also believe that thinking of rights only at the level of the individual is wrong. I think groups have rights if we’re going, … And I don’t think rights exist metaphysically. I think they’re constructs.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, they don’t! But that’s why I said you need to sit around a table and like, determine what the rights are.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! But I think groups need to have rights too. When we sit down and we say:

 

“Okay, well, individuals want to have rights.”

 

Okay, but groups need to have rights. So the nation needs to have rights too. The nation needs to be able to say:

 

“Well, this is what the nation needs in order to survive and to maintain itself. And those rights need to be respected.”

 

And in some respects they impair upon individual rights. So like I wouldn’t in a kind of, in the ethno-state, normal, healthy White people, if you want to marry another normal, normal, healthy member of the opposite sex, okay. I don’t think we should be like micromanaging that. I know there’s some eugenics spergs who think that, but I think that’s kind of really unromantic and inhumane. So okay, but then like, if you fall in love with like, I don’t know, an African woman. No! Like, we’re not going to allow that. That’s disgusting! Just like if you fall in love with your dog and you want to marry your dog. No, we’re not going to allow that either. That’s fucking disgusting!

 

Blair Cottrell: So I’m sure the African women aren’t akin to dogs? You’re talking about an actual animal versus a different, …

 

Joel Davis: Rather have a dog in my house, to be honest, than a fucking African woman.

 

Blair Cottrell: So. [chuckling] Yeah, what did you say before that? What was unromantic or inhumane? Oh, like you gave an example.

 

Joel Davis: Allowing free healthy White people to marry whatever member of the opposite sex they want to marry. I said:

 

“I think restricting that too much is inhumane, unromantic.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay, so you’re a romantic?

 

Joel Davis: We had like eugenics doing the like, nerd calculations on the genetics and we’re like:

 

“Computer says you’ve got to like marry this person!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Well let’s create a scenario somewhere in the middle. Let’s say that a White guy wants to marry Arab woman.

 

Joel Davis: Well, no! Because you’re violating the rights of the White Australian nation to perpetuate itself. You’re poisoning the blood of our nation. It’s not about you.

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re interfering with free will. And you got to understand when you ban something, you kind of make it in a taboo way more desirable to the darker nature of people. So you got to be careful with outright banning shit like that! You’ve got to discourage it and put social pressure on them.

 

Joel Davis: You know it used to be illegal in Australia, right. You know, miscegenation, like mixed race marriages used to be illegal.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right, right, I get that. But I think it would be more effective if, …

 

Joel Davis: Does everyone find it super desirable to, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Australian society right now, the way it is right now, and you just outright ban miscegenation now, I don’t know, I think you’d almost make it even more taboo. And you know when you tell a child don’t do something, you ban a child from like watching a certain TV show for example, that they kind of want to watch, then going to try harder to watch it.

 

Joel Davis: Well, you can do it, but you can move to their country and do it. I mean we want to kick them out of our country. So how are we going to let you bring in non-Whites into our country just because you want to marry them? If you want to marry them, you’re going to go to their country and marry them. But we’re not bringing in a bunch of Filipino wives into Australia and creating all these hapa franken children. Go to the Philippines if you want to.

 

Blair Cottrell: I get it. Again, at the very least, I don’t want to say illusion, but the idea of free will I think is still an important thing, because you need to show White people respect, they need to believe they have free will. I think a necessary amount of social pressure can be put on people.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but if you want rights, like if you want the nation to give you rights, you also have to respect the nation’s rights. So if you’re going to violate the nation with your rights, why should the nation continue to defend your rights? Doesn’t make any sense. It’s not reciprocal.

 

So like if you want to go in and like breed with foreign people that we deem collectively [words unclear] we’re going to expel you from the nation, you’re no longer an Australian. Take your passport and you can fuck off!

 

[1:56:39]

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. So you’re still giving the person the choice, but they have to relinquish the privileges that they’ve obtained by being Australian in order to violate the principles of the nation. I understand that. See, that’s fair. Yeah, I suppose I’m with you on that one. I just get a little bit, because I’ve always valued my own, my own autonomy.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but like the thing is White guys with Asian wives. So often I see a critic on the Internet of us and our ideology who seems like a normal White dude, and then you click on the profile and you see the Asian wife almost every time!

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you always click on the profiles of your critics to check their posting?

 

Joel Davis: On profiles all day? If I was always clicking on them I’d be doing it all day.

 

Blair Cottrell: [chuckling] Do you have any critics who you take seriously, though? Because most of the people who criticise you are not like serious critics. They’re just people that don’t like you for some reason. They don’t like something you said. Have you got any serious critics that you can, …

 

Joel Davis: They’re not really critics. I mean, I’ve had debates with people that I respect over the years who, where there are interesting debates on a particular issue. Like, I debated like the Russia, Ukraine thing with a lot of people, and I respect people that have different opinions on that issue or various other issues. I don’t think every issue is so cut and dry. And it’s interesting to hear out two positions on a lot of issues.

 

But then there’s when people are just kind of vitriolic and just hate you for emotional reasons, there’s nothing that interesting that they’re saying, you’re not really dealing with, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what I meant. Like, is there anyone who really stimulates Joel Davis, a critic that you consider to be roughly equal, who actually gets your brain moving, you enjoy actually arguing with them? Is there anyone like that?

 

Joel Davis: I haven’t found good, I used to have more people like that. But I haven’t found many good opponents lately.

 

I mean, I had a good little like, text debate with Keith Woods a few months ago. That was fun, where it was actually like a more substantive debate. But yeah, it’s hard to find good, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I sometimes wish I disagreed with. I sometimes wish I disagreed with you more on things so I could argue with you a little bit more. You would run rings around me usually.

 

But when I’ve had a good sleep and I’m in the right mood, I think we could have some really good mental clashes. I know that you kind of thrive on that kind of stuff too. I’ve noticed. Like, I watched last week’s stream with Ninja. I watched most of it and I thought to myself, next time Ninja comes on, he should try to contend with you on a few things or at least ask you to explain things further. Maybe challenge you once or twice, because I’ve noticed that that’s what really gets you going. You need that oppositional force to reckon with joel Davis: Yeah. I like debating. I like entertaining two sides. People are saying Drew Pavlou. I mean, I would go on Drew’s show if Drew wants to. I know he’s live streaming, like, every day now because he’s trying to stack Superchat coin. If he wants to get some views. Here’s one for you guys that are on Twitter. Go tell Drew Pavlou to extend the invite if he wants to have me on casual stream. We can debate things. We can discuss what’s going on in Australian culture.

 

Blair Cottrell: Drew, if you’re watching this. I don’t really know you that well. I don’t click on your profile. I’m not even allowed on Twitter. But it’s 100% a good idea. It was one of the most entertaining things I’ve ever watched. People into politics, they watched that debate that you did with Joel and thought it was really entertaining. I don’t think you could go wrong if you want to actually produce good content. I think you and Joel being in the room together again could be really good!

 

Joel Davis: Wouldn’t have to be in the room together. Like, we could just do like a Streamyard stream on his YouTube or whatever. But he’s streaming all the time and he’s just getting random people from Twitter on there. He’s getting guys that are like nationalists and stuff on there. He seems like he’s happy to talk to anyone.

 

So, yeah, someone clipped this. Drew, if you want to have a conversation, if you want to debate the issues of the day, discuss the issues of the day or whatever, a bit of content. I think it’ll get views, reach out, someone put us in touch. Let’s tee it up. I think it’d be interesting content. You know, I find Drew to be an interesting guy. He’s wrong about a lot of things, but he’s got a fun personality. I like his style. I find him to be a humourous interlocutor.

 

So let’s have a chat.

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s got lot of mental energy. I’ll give him that. He’s got a lot of mental energy. He posts on X like, 40 times a day.

 

Joel Davis: People are saying that it froze up when I said that. Is it still frozen?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it is. That’s why I was laughing, because you’re like someone clipped this and it’s just like a blurry 144p.

 

[2:01:55]

 

Joel Davis: For fuck’s sake! I don’t know what’s going on with my Internet this evening.

 

Blair Cottrell: Look, man, we got to wrap it up. I gotta go. I’m sorry, guys. I’m having a good time!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, Modern World Reject said, he threw a big Roman. He said:

 

“Indian stink!”

 

That’s the last Superchat, so we’ll end the show there.

 

Also, someone in the chat said debate Mike Enoch. Well, if he wants to have a discussion, I’ve had him on before.

 

Blair Cottrell: If I heard that Mike Enoch talks some shit about, not talked some shit about you, but how to go at you for your take on Iran, Israel situation.

 

Joel Davis: I think that was vindicated. Yeah, my take, that was vindicated. So look, I haven’t actually listened to that podcast, but people told me that too.

 

If you want to have a discussion, Mike. Yeah, I’m a fair guy. I’m happy to listen to his point of view. We agree on a lot of things, on most things. So be a fun conversation. Click this. If I’m not frozen, send it to the TRS guys, happy to talk to Mike, but yeah, I’m an open minded guy. I’m a fair guy willing to debate and discuss the issues.

 

So let’s talk about it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Before we, before we finish up. We’ve got a question for you. Is boredom a problem for you? Because I’ve realised you get like, you just have a brain that moves all the time. It’s always ticking over. It seems to be that way. Do you ever feel bored or like you’re battling boredom? Is that an issue for you?

 

Joel Davis: Not really. Only if I’m like forcibly subjected to something which is boring. But if I’m free to do my own thing, I’m never bored.

 

Blair Cottrell: So if you’re on your own, if you’re like spending periods of time during the day by yourself, like you’re not the sort of person who needs to distract yourself or find lots of things to do or think about. Like, you’re always okay with your own company. You’re always fine sitting there with your own thoughts, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I just, I feel like I don’t get enough time to myself.

 

Blair Cottrell: But yeah, no, I can relate to that. Yeah, it’s actually a good sign. Yeah, I noticed a lot of fixed personalities are like that. Like they always want more time to themselves and they seem to benefit by spending time with themselves. And I definitely fall into that category. I feel like I fall into that category, too.

 

But anyway, thanks for joining us, guys. We’ll see you guys next week, I guess. I’ve got a big weekend, so take care. Anything else, Joel, before we finish?

 

Joel Davis: No, just White power! Hail victory! Blood and honour! We’ll see you all next time.

 

Blair Cottrell: See you later, guys.

 

[2:04:38]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/28/2025 = 21 )

BeamRider101
1 day ago
Foreign operatives paying criminals to stage hoax terrorism, to then get our speech laws changed, then the people in government changing those laws, failing to show up at the inquiry, is outrageous, normally it’d be instant dismissal and total overhaul of the government, but they appear to be getting away with it again.
11 likes

Report
BradC1988
1 day ago
Ban black cunts, not knives in Australia.
10 likes

Report
thorne91
Supporter+
1 day ago
JFK was a real American
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
SSlieutenant
21 hours ago
The First Catholic POTUS
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
RoseRock444
Supporter
21 hours ago
Disgusting
0 likes

Report
leibekohne
1 day ago
China was created by jew with stolen intellectual properties just to create today’s war situation. All is pre-planned as covid was to murder legally especially young American solders, but to depopulate and destroy world usurious economy. Traitor Tramp is jewish puppet bitch. This all proofs that nothing would be changed through jew voting scum and evil democracy.
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
SSlieutenant
22 hours ago
Canada does the same thing, calling a homosexual a f-g is a $10,000 fine or jailtime.
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
22 hours ago
Did China turn on the jews under Ci Jinping?
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
mharrison52
21 hours ago
seeing us congressman calling for war with China, id say there’s a good chance. china is close to being nat soc if you really think about it.
0 likes

Report
leibekohne
1 day ago
Now it the time to register Party and nail jew for good to the coffin once and for all.
3 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
Motown88
Supporter
22 hours ago
When Whites become a minority in AU there won’t be any special privilege for minorities like there is now… In fact, persecution will go into full blown legal discrimination. South Africa is the canary in the coal mine.
3 likes

Report
mikecleary84
1 day ago
blurryish
2 likes

Report
thorne91
Supporter+
1 day ago
24:05 Blair that was fucking hilarious
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
thorne91
Supporter+
1 day ago
I was laughing so hard at this my sides hurt
1 like

Report
hailslcants
1 day ago
hey guys
0 likes

Report
hailslcants
1 day ago
what time u starting u cants?
0 likes

Report
mikecleary84
1 day ago
good enough guys
0 likes

Report
BigotSmalls
Supporter
1 day ago
LFG crew. ORG keep up with the conversation. Like share chalk.
0 likes

Report
SSlieutenant
22 hours ago
First 25 minutes of the show: Eldridge Colby policy William Colby his grandfather was head of CIA Anglo Americans, CIA was an Anglo organization but was couped by jews during WW2 and after JFK 1963/ replaced under LBJ Eldridge was in 1st Trump Admin and told them that China must be focused on at all costs or America will fall. His policy is intuitive, Netanyahu violated this policy by striking Iran. China is top supplier to Iran. Netanyahu is greedy and wants greater israel and cannot accept backseat. Iran is stronger than israel, and Net wants to sack US to defeat Iran. US public does not support this war. Not to mention Israel trade relationship with China.
0 likes

Report
Motown88
Supporter
21 hours ago
Your description of Gen X is lacking in understanding and knowledge… Probably has a lot to do with your millennial sense of entitlement.
0 likes

=================

ODESSY COMMENTS

22 comments

HyperChat minimums:
100 LBC
0
Doom Nebulae
16 hours ago
Why the fuck would you go fight China on behalf of ZOG?! This is beyond stupid.

6
0
GenuineGoy
1 day ago
Mike Enoch is obviously jewish in his physical appearance, and it’s confirmed by his jewish ex wife.

1
1
Hide replies
King Tut
4 hours ago
fuck Mike Enoch! every time he opens his mouth, all I hear is verbal diahreah. he is the reason why I could never get into TRS.

0
1
Cone of Silence
1 day ago
If you would like to broaden your purview on just how long, the US and us by proxy, have been subverted by Israel, the watch the last 2 episodes from Blackpilled.com

2
0
Reclaim
5 hours ago(edited)
some indian guy came to my office once and kept trying to show me his fancy watch and I was like dude, I really don’t care about such things.

1
0
GenuineGoy
1 day ago
Mike peinovich is jewish.

0
2

@EverybodywakeUp
2 hours ago
Blair hit it on the head with boomers, my mum is a boomer and she works so hard. Since she was 16, she can’t not work and always wants to be busy.

King Tut
5 hours ago
Jews aren’t just overplaying the holohoax card, but the “Nazi” card. recently at a US Senate hearing Kristi Noem and Ice were compared to “Nazis hunting down Jews” by some Jew or shabbos goy. it was pathetic! they basically saying you aren’t allowed to deport invaders who broke our laws and came to US illegally because if you do, you’re a “Nazi”.

Cecil
5 hours ago
china will take Taiwan without a shot. They have been infiltrating it for years and putting their own people in place

1
0

@CloudWhine
10 hours ago
Also, you mentioned there being ZERO evidence that Trump is a Russian Agent. I am not saying he is or isn’t, go watch the documentaries The Dubious Friends Of Donald Trump and Active Measures. Trumps deep financial ties to Russian crime and even Soviet actors goes back to the 80s and his close ties to Russian mob are undeniable. So, please review that information and revise your position. This is embarrassing.

@CloudWhine
10 hours ago
Your take on Taiwan is painfully misinformed. It is as if you are getting your information from people like McGregor and Ritter, two literal Russian sycophants. The COMMUNISTS didn’t fight alongside the Chinese Nationalists in ww2, they fled to the mountains, and when the war was over and the nationalists were beleaguered, they came down and took over. Taiwan was NEVER NEVER NEVER Part of the the CCP. Fuck China, Fuck Duginist multipolarity. Dugin is Anti White and Anti West, and youd know that if you actually listened to his long format interviews. He and Putin say their commitment to multiculturalism often. Let me guess, 4D chess? They have to say it? Forgive me if Im wrong and you know that he is a multiculturalist. Real reform looks like taking back our countries, not destroying them so 1 billion Chinese and 1 billion Indians can take over, and we get raped and killed in the aftermath. There is ZERO chance that have a Renaissance if we fall into disrepair. Our planned genocide is on the table, and will happen the second we become a punching bag for the world. Honestly, go get your information about taiwan from other sources than RT stooges or American politicians on the take from China.

1
0
GenuineGoy
1 day ago
have a good day everyone

@sparkofspirit
1 day ago
thanks guys o/

Rebbe Schneerson
1 day ago
He admitted it himself

Rebbe Schneerson
1 day ago
^^^

Walther Mauser
1 day ago
Yep, Nature is racist. It is only natural.

scoobyburn
1 day ago
anti septic

warren-g
1 day ago

@ConeOfSilence
the last one was pretty good

Callaghan
1 day ago

@Daniel
1 day ago
Best show of the week coming up boys

@Daniel
1 day agoAUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE

Callaghan
1 day ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and welcome to Patriotic Weekly Review, episode number 267. And I’m here tonight with lots of people. This isn’t a regular episode, it is our election special, so we’ve got an entire panel who I’ll be introducing shortly. I’m going to try and keep my intro to an absolute minimum. We’re obviously live on Odysee, we’re live on Rumble, we’re live on DLive, and we’re live on Entropy.

 

I will be back on Friday. I’ve got a pre-recorded video about how it’s actually us, the people who are genuine ethno-nationalists, that have influenced the election in more ways than one and forced Farage into adopting our talking points. Look out for that Friday. I’ll also be back for a special stream with my brother from another mother, aka Natty, on Sunday, but we’ll discuss that later at the end. Please do consider making a small donation towards this show if you enjoy the work I do, if you value the fact we’re putting forward general election candidates, if you like all of the other bits and pieces that I do on a regular basis, please consider donating via Odysee or Entropy.

 

Remember, none of my work goes behind a paywall. Everything is free. All of the streams you can watch anytime, anywhere. You can even download my book for free. You can also donate by crypto-currency. All the crypto links are in the description below. That’s on Odysee, that’s on Rumble, and that’s on replay over on BitChute.

 

If you’re watching there, please consider donating via crypto if you want to be more anonymous.

 

And finally, you can download my book for free, which is at www.thefallofwesternman.com and you can write to me at Mark I think that’s the quickest intro I ever did. Less than two minutes. Let’s get into it. We’ve got three people here.

 

I’m just going to describe them all to the best of my ability. We have Natty, who is a very good friend of mine. Myself and Natty, we like gaming together. He has great political takes. He was obviously somebody who was a leading groyper back in the day. I’ve met this guy on numerous occasions. He is a wonderful man. He is a father, he is a nationalist, he’s a role model. He’s also a great speaker. We’ve got Tollah is another very good friend of mine. He’s been here from the start. Former host of TASOB [The Absolute State Of Britain] of he now has a couple of awesome shows of his own. He is a comedian. He’s a man who gives absolutely wonderful advice on how to deal with belligerent women. A hero to us all, I would say.

 

And finally, we’ve got David Clews, the media mogul of the group. David is another man I’m proud to call a friend. He is the host and owner of Unity News Network. He shows an absolute fire. I enjoy watching them. And if the family are out on a Saturday or Sunday, and David’s doing one of those all afternoon streams, there’s nothing better to dip into. He’s a scholar, a gentleman, and I get on really well with him, too.

 

And of course, he’s also a family man.

 

So let’s get into it, guys. I’ve done the intros, everything’s out the way in three minutes. That’s never been done before.

 

So let’s get into this, because it’s about the general election.

 

I was going to do it maybe next week. I didn’t want to do it on the eve of the election, but I think so much stuff has happened that it was worthy doing it tonight. And we’ll go around the group, always starting with Natty. We’ll try and keep our answers short.

 

And let’s start with the big question very briefly, what are your predictions for the outcome of this election? And obviously, we’re going to talk about the big parties, talk about Reform. Also mention our friend George Galloway, who we’ll speak about later because he’s in the middle of suing Hope Not Hate, apparently, which is very interesting. But what are your predictions, Natty?

 

Natty: Labour win. Farage takes a few seats, Tories hopefully lose a lot and end up with very, very few seats, but get humiliated by Reform. Labour government may be the biggest, biggest number of seats in a very long time, so that very, very, basically, that’s my prediction for it. I’m pretty sure that’s pretty standard. I don’t know if anyone’s got any in from the left field ideas, but I’m pretty sure that’s what’s going to happen.

 

Mark Collett: Well, not to butt in, mate, but very quickly, if you were to predict, I’m not saying down to the last seat, but predict roughly how many seats Labour will get. What’s your prediction?

 

Natty: 570. Is it something like that? I think that’s probably about right. 570.

 

Mark Collett: Wow!

 

Natty: I don’t know if there’s going to be some Green seats. I know people always talk about alliances. The thing is, when you’re this close to it, the noise is almost unbearable and you can’t make out much. And every morning there’s another story, political gaffe or blunder or whatever, but it’s going to be a big Labour win, I think.

 

Mark Collett: Good, good.

 

Well, thank you for that. Tollah, my friend. Good to have you here on the all star panel. What are your overall predictions, my friend? When you’ve given them in, if you say Labour, if you say Tory, what do you think the winning party is going to have in terms of seats?

 

The Ayatollah: Well, thanks for having me, first of all. Yeah. You can’t predict anything other than the Labour win, despite the fact that there isn’t an enormous amount of grassroots enthusiasm for Starmer or for Labour. And that’s not helped by the fact that they’re seen as being complicit in the Gaza genocide, you know, by their sort of, broadly speaking, their kind of zionism and so on.

 

Obviously, it always bears repeating that Keir Starmer. Keir Six Pointed Starmer, as I called him on TASOB four and a half years ago when he replaced Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader, when the jews had Corbyn ousted. He’s married to a jewish woman and they’re raising their daughters in the jewish faith. My main prediction is that the Tories won’t do as badly as people predict, sadly. I think they may well still get over 100 seats.

 

As to how many Labour we get, I don’t know. Reform might take one or two, but they won’t take more, despite the fact that they may actually get a really good number of votes, because I think we’ve got an unprecedented level of disillusionment with the two major parties. I mean, on the lack of popularity of Labour, the one point I would make is, even though it was all predicated on, like, a type of deception, of a sophistication we haven’t seen before in British politics.

 

And it was all predicated on kind of lies and spin, say what you will, about new Labourites, demonic as they were, and their kind of successes remain. People were deceived into genuine enthusiasm for them before the 1997 election, before the kind of Blair and brown era. I don’t think that’s the case that time. But people hate the Tories so much, and with good reason, you know, that they’ll. Yeah, they will get hit hard, but I think they may still get over 100 seats.

 

The Tories. The latest prediction today from Telegraph was that they’d get 53 in a survey, the Telegraph commission, the Tories. But I don’t know how many that would leave Labour with? It’ll be a lot. I think they’ll have a decent majority because I can’t imagine the vote’s going to be split too much other ways because of First Past the Post, basically.

 

Mark Collett: So if you were to give a number of Labour seats, what would you go for? Natty’s gone for 570, so you’ve got to pick a whole new, …

 

The Ayatollah: What’s the total in Parliament? Is it about 630 or something? Right.

 

Mark Collett: Remember, 2 seconds. Remember, only 632 of those seats are on the mainland, so 18 and Northern Ireland seats, which basically you never get Labour.

 

So, you know, even if Tories totally whitewashed it, they’d still probably only get 632. Do, you know what I mean?

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, I mean, a bit would depend on how the and [word unclear] do, but I would think Labour would be on course to get well over 450, I would think.

 

Mark Collett: Give me an exact number.

 

The Ayatollah: 463.

 

Mark Collett: Okay.

 

And finally, on to the big man himself. Big daddy David, we are blessed to have you here tonight, mate. And I am really looking forward to your take. Specifically, the next question is a question for you. But what are your predictions, my friend?

 

David Clews: I’m predicting victory for the Likud party, the Trilateral Commission, the Fabian Society. It is quite, quite funny. I just took Tallis to the next level. Yeah. I’ve had the opinion from the very start that Sunak is actually deliberately throwing this election.

 

Now, you know what? I quite like my rabbit holes. I like to be, perhaps one might say, slightly more conspiratorial. I think that Sunak is throwing this election on purpose, and the reasons I think he’s doing that is he had no excuses or reason to call it when he did in July. He could have waited till October, November. His behaviour on the campaign trail has been so horrific, it was the same as during Covid. Remember, they always used to say:

 

“Well, it’s just incompetent. There are degrees of incompetence.”

 

So I think he’s deliberately throwing it, and I think they’re doing it because they want to install Starmer, because Starmer’s their golden boy, and Sunak is a puppet. He’s typical of all these sort of basically Indian CEO’s that run companies now. They’re all very, very Zionist. They’re all very pliable. And he’ll go to San Diego. Job done.

 

I mean, yes, it’s an uncomfortable couple of months. Yeah. I mean, seats wise, really, it could be anything. I think the one thing I would say is, I think the SNP might do better than people think. That’s the only one up in Scotland. Like, everyone’s written off the SNP. I am not so sure that Labour will do as well as people think up here, but in terms of seat predictions.

 

So you’ve got 630 at play. I would say that that Tories will get less than 100. I think the Lib Dems will do pretty well. Probably about five. I would say about 540 would be my number.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, well, I’ll give my brief predictions. I’ve already predicted a Labour landslide and I’ve said Labour will get between 500 and 550.

 

So I’m going to go square in the middle there at 525. I think the Tories will get less than 100 seats. I think, like David said, the SNP will do slightly better than expected. And I’ve already said, actually, that the Tories could be pushed into third or fourth place actually behind the Lib Dems and the SNP, if things go particularly badly, because you’ve got to remember, not every marginal seat is a marginal seat. That is Tory, Labour. There are many marginal seats which are Tory Lib Dem. Lib Dem seem to be a vote that people would rather jump to rather than Labour in certain sort of leafy Tory areas.

 

For some reason, I think that Farage may well get elected in Clacton. Now. I said he wouldn’t earlier, but he’s become such a legitimate celebrity candidate after being on the:

 

“I’m a celebrity, get me out of here!”

 

He’s just got this power. You rarely get this.

 

I think there’s only two candidates in the whole country you would call celebrity politicians, and that’s Galloway and Farage.

 

But I don’t think Farage will get enough of a block in Parliament to be significant. I’d like to be proven wrong there, but because although I don’t like Reform and what Farage really stands for, the fact they’re talking our talking points, it’d be nice to see them going over the line on an ethno-nationalist ticket, which is what they’re fighting on. Deport all migrants. Which is basically his new campaign slogan. Deport all illegal migrants. Stop the boat is the exact same wording, minus two letters. What is on the election leaflet that we’ve put out for the ethno-nationalist candidates as they deport all illegal immigrants rather than migrants? Stop the boats. He’s basically lifted that off us.

 

So in a way, it’s an endorsement of our points, which is good. So my prediction is 525 for Labour fewer than 100 for the Tories. Lib Dems doing okay, SNP doing better than expected, but Reform really unfortunately slightly underperforming. And I do think Galloway will be unseated in Rochdale as well due to the amount of establishment pressure being put on him. And I hope, I’d like to be proved wrong there, but I think that’ll be the case.

 

Anyway, let’s go on next because this is a real David Clews question. We’ll go around the group. I didn’t have to stop David earlier because he was going into the territory of the next question, which is, what do you think this is all going to lead to? Because we’re going into a time which may make the majorities of Blair and Thatcher look piffling. It’ll certainly likely to make the Johnson majority look small. This is going to be for one party to end up with over 500 seats and the rest to be very fragmented, is new territory, post Second World War in the UK. What do you think that will lead to, Natty? A massive Labour majority. What will that lead to?

 

Natty: Well, it’s hard to predict because I know David said that it’s the Likud party winning.

 

However, a significant proportion of Labour’s base and their core voters are really not on board with Israel. And a lot of, like Corbynite voters who will hold their noses and vote for Labour Party aren’t happy with Starmer’s stance on Israel. So it’s easy to think, well, big majority, pro-zionism and just unwavering support for Israel.

 

Now, you may get that in the backrooms, but it’s not going to be on the surface. And they can’t go shouting about that if they do. I just want to say, I mean, I have given the biggest prediction for the Labour seats here. I haven’t just pulled that number from my backside. I know that there are going to be conservative holdout seats, but you’ve got to remember that there is still a racial component to this and a lot of the kind of pension age people who died in the war, Conservatives are going to find it very, very hard to vote for Rishi Sunak, if nothing else, purely on racial grounds, because it’s like a national shame, national embarrassment, that we have an Indian man at the head of the country, ostensibly the head of a country. I mean, we all know that he’s beholden to other powers.

 

However, don’t underestimate the fact that, as the Twitter and the pundit class would say, these people are racist in the best way possible and will not vote for Rishi Sunak.

 

Mark Collett: That’s a good take. Tollah, what do you think? Where’s this leading? And what will happen with such a sizable Labour majority?

 

The Ayatollah: I think it would be terrible. I think the overwhelming majority of what we hate will rapidly accelerate. There wouldn’t have, you know, had the Tories carried on it like people somehow kind of been kind of psyopped by some, but even by kind of this occupation standards, incredible conditioning and manipulation into just voting the Tories in again, which isn’t going to happen. It would have continued to accelerate because that just seems to be what they’re doing.

 

But there’s going to be even less kind of token resistance to that with Labour. What you’ve got to remember with the Labour Party is they are staffed not entirely, but almost entirely by true believers, like actual cultists. These are cultists of the Zionist occupation regime, make no mistake about it, and a lot of vengeful non-Whites.

 

Now, don’t get me wrong. Obviously it’s comics, as Natty was just talking about. It’s comically true of the Tories of recent years with Sunak, with Braviman, with Patel, with Javid, with Kwarteng. You know, that the name goes on. The list goes on. Sorry, the names go on, whichever you prefer. Yeah, they’re obviously racial foreigners as well.

 

But I think some of them probably are somewhat milquetoast Conservatives rather than absolute grievance mongers like your Diane Abbotts and everything else.

 

Now, as despicable as the Tories are, and we can’t say that enough, I think there are some people within the party, albeit they don’t have much influence at all! They’re somewhat normal. Still, in their sensibilities. They are not total ZOG cultists. I think that’s much less true with Labour. They will feel they’ve got a mandate to do all of this stuff. Yes, it’s antithetical to what, you know, people in the old Red Wall, which is presumably going to be at least partially restored in, like the north of England want. But who gives a damn about what they want? Who’s give damn about what, you know, who’s giving damn about what they want and what people like us want for generations? Nobody.

 

So they’ll feel they’ve got a mandate to just go full throttle with immigration, with anti-White legislation, with just creating an atmosphere of anti-Whiteness. They’re obviously going to be controlled enough by the usual Zionist interest that, yeah, they’ll have to ride out the tension of being hated by part of their Muslim base and whatever else for continuing to support Israel and jewish interests.

 

Now, the other thing with that is that what that may lead to, and this is an obvious prediction to make, is a fracturing in which they lose a lot of their Muslim support and Muslims look to form their own party. That’s probably been sort of down the road for a while and we’re getting closer to it, but I think things will get worse.

 

But, yeah, that may, as awful as that sounds, that may not be a bad thing because the riots been on the war for a while, that things will have to get worse before they get better. But whether they will or not, that’s another matter. Whether they will get better, that is. They’ll definitely get worse.

 

Mark Collett: Thank you, mate. This is one for you, David. It’s almost the question written for you, but what’s going to happen with this Labour majority and how bad could it be?

 

David Clews: Yeah, these are all fantastic takes and everyone really gets it. I’ve been listening to a lot of the Academic Agent, he started the zero seats campaign and he’s obviously a very, very sharp guy.

 

I mean, yeah, I’m quite black pilled when it comes to politics in general, but I understand what he’s trying to do and his point is you destroy the Tory Party, which is one part of the university-party, at least one standing, Labour have nowhere to hide. If I was Keir Starmer or if I was in the Labour front bench, I would probably be excuse, shitting myself right now because you’re going to get in, you’re going to have this huge majority. This isn’t 1997, you’ve not got a balanced budget, you’ve not got an economic surplus, you’ve got huge financial problems like nothing compared to what Blair inherited, and you’re going to be the only ones left. Like, there’ll be nowhere to hide and what he is saying will happen.

 

And I think this is very believable and even, dare I say, as much as I hate him, Andrew Neil pointed this out as well. Within six months, like, support for the Labour Party will collapse because you’ve got all those internal conflicts. People will see what’s going on.

 

And that’s where, though I, again, I am slightly more conspiratorial about it all. I think there is a plan for some form of conflict and war and I think that’s what all this is leading towards, whether it’s NATO troops on the ground in Ukraine or. I also think Trump will get in a war with Iran on behalf of Israel. So I think. And that’s where you’re going to talk about Farage. That’s where I think Farage also has a role to play in. We could maybe expand on that.

 

So initially, I think you’ll have Labour will come in, there’ll be this groundswell of support. But this is not 1997. This is not like I remember when Blair won in 97. People loved Tony Blair. Like, there was I hated him, I hated the guy, but you could see it and, like, things can only get better. What basically this election is, we fucking hate Britannia, mate.

 

Mark Collett: Is what?

 

David Clews: Britannia.

 

Mark Collett: Britannia.

 

David Clews: We hate the Tories. Let’s give them a do. And everyone’s right as well about the racial aspect of it. Starmer, even Labour have been playing the dog whistle. Starmer was. Well, that’s the problem with Rishi Sunak. He just doesn’t get Britain. Now we know fine well what that means. He’s saying:

 

“Well, he’s not one of you.”

 

And the public get that as well, and that will be the nail in the coffin for the Tories.

 

And at the end of the day, whether people like Starmer or not, he is an English man. He was born in, I mean, he’s a Cockney. I mean, well, he’s not really a full Cockney, but it’s in the southeast of England. He’s genuinely one of the people. And people don’t view things the way we do. So for your average normie, they’ll look at it, they’ll say:

 

“Well, yeah, he served the government, he’s a Sir, we’ll vote for him.”

 

The Ayatollah: His father was a tool maker, apparently. Yeah, he definitely did. Yeah. Funny, funny, funny.

 

Natty: As to cycling back to the question, it’s very easy to say things are going to get worse before they’re going to get better.

 

But when it actually comes down to the wire and you’re staring down that choice of a huge Labour majority, it is intimidating, because you’re right, it is going to get worse. You think it’s draconian now, things are going to be bad, and we’re looking at different aspects and different things going on and saying, it’s bad now, it’s bad now, it has to get worse before it can get better.

 

But for things to actually get worse and to actually make that choice and put a Mark on a piece of paper, that’s a difficult thing for nationalists to do because it’s so much easier just to cling on to hope and say our Reform, they could change it around, this is good times and maybe the right people in a Conservative Party could change things around.

 

But it’s a tough choice. Every man in his own head is probably thinking, you know, Labour are gonna really really hurt us as the native population and there’s no question about it.

 

Mark Collett: Well I’m gonna have a couple of predictions that you can all comment on.

 

Firstly, I think there is a meaning to all this. I’ve noticed that Labour are campaigning with the Union Jack a lot.

 

There’s been prevalent discussion of conscription, return to national service, the importance of the military being a strong nation. Sunak said he doesn’t want to be a wartime leader. Andrew Bridgen said the country’s already at war. I believe Suella Barverman said that we are effectively at war as well. I think they’re cleaning out a tattered worthless government that wouldn’t have the moral backing to take us into an actual hot war, to bring in a party that would have such a backing on paper that it would look like they had the legitimacy to take us into a war and a clean record because all those old Labour MP’s that were part of the Blair Brown times, most of them have gone now.

 

This is a fresh start. I think they’re looking to take us into something very very dangerous and I think part of that will be bundled with if we’re going down this route, if we’re going to war, if we’re going to be fighting, we need a massive clamp down on any form of dissident discussion and that will be dissidents on both the Right, mainly the Right, but also on the left as well because they will want to say:

 

“Look, we need a unified nation because now.”

 

And look this is shades of World War Two because World War Two was:

 

“But we’re fighting for democracy, we’re fighting for freedom, we’re fighting for British values.”

 

All this crap. When really they were fighting to keep a certain group of bankers in control of the Western world, that’s what it was for, and to prop up communism. And the communists were the brothers of the bankers who were controlling the Western world. That’s what happened. It’s just a fact.

 

And I find that a lot of the same rhetoric used then is being used now:

 

“We’re fighting for democracy. There’s a shadow over the world, an Axis of evil!”

 

What were the, what was the German and Italian forces called? The Axis forces. It’s almost like when you’re reading a poem and everything rhymes you can see the lines that match up with the ones that have been previously spoken. And this is all happening.

 

And just as they did with Mosley, just as they did with other dissident groups in the UK, I can see them really clamping down on indigenous groups specifically because they’re going to need White men. A war in this country, or a war involving Britain does not get fought without White men marching off happily to die. And they don’t want White men listening to this panel of people tonight or listening to UNN or tuning into one of Tollah’s shows. They don’t want that! They want White men thinking Labour is the party of the Union Jack, the party of patriotism, so they’ll fight.

 

Natty, I don’t know if you want to comment on that. And we’ll go around the group before we move on to Farage.

 

Natty: Let someone else go first, I think, on this one.

 

Mark Collett: Go on, David. You go first, mate.

 

The Ayatollah: This is your one.

 

Mark Collett: We’ll do it in reverse this time. We’ll go David Tollah, Natty this time.

 

David Clews: Yeah, I mean, he’s exactly correct. The language being utilised. Grant Sharp’s an Axis of Tyranny. Except I struggle to comprehend, though, how the ruling elites are the powers that think people are going to fight these wars for them. Because where is that support going to come from? And who is going to go to the recruitment offices? Because we have this aged population. Young guys have never been in the cadets, the scouts, they don’t know how to fire or strip a gun. I mean, you watch the footage of cadets marching. They can barely march, certainly not in step.

 

So it is a weirdness about it, which, again, makes you feel you’re at this kind of end of Empire stage.

 

But yeah, that’s where, and I know we’re going to talk about Farage. That’s where I think the likes of Farage comes in, Tommy Robinson comes in, Geert Wilders, there’s Marine Le Pen. And that is why you see the Zionist power structure, you know, pivoting away now towards what you would call Right-wing politics. And there is this clear alliance that now exists.

 

And a lot of people are mistakenly thinking, well, we work with these people and we get to deport people. We get to do all that.

 

Actually, no, you’re still on the strings. You’re not going to achieve anything.

 

And I think that’s probably one of the more interesting dynamics that’s coming out of this, because you look at some of the Reform stuff, you look at what, and all that seems okay, but then you just realise, well, it’s not being done for our interests. It’s being done for that group’s interest. And I was putting this up today. You’ve got Blackrock supports Starmer coming in. You’ve got Blackstone now buying up rental properties.

 

So the international banking cartel is still, business is still booming in the UK for them.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, I mean, just follow up on that. I mean, well, particularly on what you were saying, Mark.

 

I mean, that’s interesting because if they’re going to do what you described, then it has to be, it needs to be, as you’ve said, they need White men if they’re going to actually participate in like a kind of a NATO versus Russia and its allies war or Iran or whatever. They need a lot more White men than they’re getting. And we’re talking kind of long time scales because you’ve got to recruit them, get them in and all of that kind of thing.

 

And it would necessitate, if they’re going to do that and then kind of basically clamp down harder on non-compliant Whites. They need to draw a sharp distinction between the two. And it needs to be a lot of carrot and a much more conciliatory tone. Contrary to what I was saying, I would expect the Labour government to be like before. They will need to box a bit more clever with that and just throw the White working class a bit of toffee and just soften their rhetoric a bit and make it, you know, sort of butter them up. You know, make it, make a few token concessions.

 

And then, yeah, people like us, they will kind of quarantine as much as they can and really clamp down and it will be a kind of a, well, which way do you want to go? Do you want to be patriotic or do you want to be one of those people in jail? And it’s quite possible they’ll go that way with it, I suppose. Yeah. Because as you say, when you look at it in its geopolitical contexts, the sort of the drums of war seem to have been being struck for a good while now.

 

But I mean, just picking up on what David said, I think it was you, David and other people shared it around. I think it was you that shared the video of the, like, it was kind of combined services marching. And I used the word loosely through London a couple of, like a month or two back and they’re all just like fat, uncoordinated idiots. Like, with the greatest respect, I’d be more scared of sees.

 

Mark Collett: It was like the old police.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, no, I’d be more. I’d be more scared of the Bass street kids teaming up with Harvey Price, you know, so, I mean crikey. Yeah, it’s extraordinary! I mean the slight black pill on that is they’ll get enough, like high IQ, autistic people to kind of do the high tech stuff, which is a big part of our war is fought now with your drones and your unmanned vehicles and all sorts of other things and cyber warfare and all the rest of it. And you ain’t going to be mega-bright to go and be cannon fodder, but you’ve got to be at least competent and have a bit of bottle. Are they going to get people that are like that? Well, if they do, yeah, they want to get more working class White people.

 

So, yeah, they might have to sort of be a bit of current. Stick with the White population. And that’s always our lament.

 

I mean, I said this after Chris Kearney, better known as Charlie Big Potatoes, got his sentence this time last year. The great frustration under this regime is, and it’s like the old point that I heard Warren Balogh make this point once about communist Hungary after 1955, I think it was. They kind of realised you can’t, it doesn’t really pay in the long run to be absolutely brutal with everyone because you make an enemy of everyone together and everybody knows what’s going on. The more people, you limit that to the real harsh treatment.

 

On the one hand, it’s not that it’s more effective, but you aren’t creating so much ill will among the other people that are allowed to just sort of stay fat and comfortable. Not that too many people were kind of fat under communism, although apparently they were in Russia. The Russians were fatter in the seventies than in the eighties. Sorry, than Americans in the seventies, apparently. That’s courtesy of Eric Striker. I’ve been forever checked that off your bingo card.

 

But, yeah, that’s me done for the moment.

 

Natty: Yeah, that’s right. At the moment, the client groups of the British government and European ZOG, whatever you want to call it, are immigrants, third world immigrants, Africans, Middle Easterners, whatever. But a war, all out war with NATO’s enemies, it’s entirely possible and reasonable to predict.

 

But actually the White young men of this country are treated as a client group and are riled up in the way we see Tommy Robinson riling up against Muslims. And he obviously gets paid for that, paid handsomely, to ignore people pointing out the obvious truth to him, that it’s actually people not exactly like us, but our peers, young guys, young White guys, native people of this country, who are treated as the client groups of the British state in order to get them back in tanks, to get them back in trenches, to teach them how to fight and to try and instil some sort of patriotic values in them.

 

Whether that’s possible, I don’t know. Have they done enough damage? It’s hard to see from where we are, because all of us here, I hate our government because they’re absolute scum and they’re absolute traitors! But for a bricklayer, or a tradie, or a guy who’s not that plugged in, it’s hard to say.

 

I mean, this may become illegal at some point, but I wouldn’t fight for this government. I think you’d have to put me in jail first. And maybe that’s a choice all of us are going to have to make down the line at some point. Hopefully not.

 

But it’s entirely possible that they can actually achieve that with the right people. And we’re skirting around for arch.

 

But I think that’s where the conversation is going to go.

 

David Clews: Again, just to come in quickly on that from a more chess perspective, what they would require to do that is some form of, I would call, serious false flag provocation. You would need 9/11 style events because you look at America after 9/11, George Bush’s approval rating went up to like, what, 94, 95% or something like that.

 

Now, if you’re to witness, I know, dare I say, someone running around a shopping centre shooting people and their Hezbollah ID card drops out like they did with Mohammed Atta’s passport falling out of the sky. Don’t underestimate the power a serious false flag attack or some form of real visual thing would have on the general population. When I come across people in the counter jihad movement the hatred that is there for Muslims, for Islam, for the Islamification which is real, you know, that many places have been changed. If you were to see Lee Rigby style situations, Manchester bombing situations, I think people would mobilise.

 

You saw the football lads alliance, the amount of people that got out for that. So I certainly wouldn’t put it past the government that there would be these huge false flag attempt things, there would be Muslims that do it linked to Iran, you know, that funded this was funded by Tehran, this, the mullah. Even though Shia Muslims have never engaged in international terrorism or done all that, it’s always been sponsored by Mossad, the CIA. I think you would find that would really, and as you say, they know people are race based and they want to plug into that.

 

So that’s what I think is how they would really mobilise public support.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I want to pivot away from that slightly before we go on to Farage, just for a quick point, because there’s been a lot of this in the press over the last couple of days.

 

Now, one of the things that Labour is intent on doing as well seems to be attacking middle England. And I was prompted to mention this because David said something very interesting about Blackrock, Blackstone. These are the huge investor groups, but they really do seem to be intent on already preparing a charter that will primarily hit your sort of just above average tax paying people who’ve got a little bit of something for themselves.

 

So one of their insane schemes is to put VAT on private school fees or why would you do that? If somebody’s paying to send their own child to school, they’re doing the nation a service.

 

Number one, they’re easing the burden on state schools, which are already too full.

 

Number two, they are paying for a better standard of education for their child.

 

And the more educated people you have in your nation, that’s a good thing. Why would you then increase that family’s burden by 20%, potentially forcing their children out of a better schooling, dumping them into an already over stretched, oversaturated state school system, unless you just hated people having anything nice. And it’s the same with inheritance tax. They’re already talking about increasing inheritance tax, they’re talking about swooping on family savings accounts.

 

This, to me looks like a blatant attempt by what can only be described as people who have serious aspirations to produce some kind of communist terror, redistribution of wealth, etcetera, to actually take what little there is left from people who have lived a frugal life and got a bit of a nest egg.

 

I mean, that to me is in many ways as terrifying in terms of its intent as taking us to war. Because really what you’re saying, and if you put those things in the same basket, let’s not totally separate them, let’s put them in the same basket. Now you’re reducing everyone to the level of being an utter peasant under these political rulers, these financiers etcetera. And then you’re saying to the peasantry:

 

“Now you’ve got nothing. We’re marching you off to war to die.”

 

What’s your thoughts on that, guys? Who wants to go first on that one?

 

Natty: Yeah, there’s a level of discomfort that states who oppress and are, in our case, in the process of slowly ethnically cleansing. There’s a level of discomfort where people don’t rebel. And it’s typically in revolutions, it’s been the middle class who have been activated against the elites. This is true in Russia. And they’ve always had elite support, normally from the elites who aren’t in power, who support a middle class uprising.

 

Now, again, I mean, maybe I’m in the Right company here for conspiratorial talk, but reducing the middle class and taking enough away from them so that they become dispossessed and hard up and struggling to make ends meet, but not to the point where they’re ready to grab a pitchfork and a Molotov cocktail is exactly the kind of evil shenanigans that a government like ours would pull.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, I think a lot of people heading towards that point because of cost of living increases as well. I would just say quickly, and because of the lack of viability for a lot of people, of even renting sometimes, let alone owning a home, forming a family and all the rest of it.

 

But, I mean, if they’re orchestrating that to the degree we think they might be, it’s whether they end up striking the right balance, because, as you kind of allude to, Natty, it’s a delicate balance.

 

But anyway, I digress.

 

David Clews: Look at what they did to try and curb inflation. They stuck interest rates up to, what, five and a half percent?

 

Now, all they’ve actually done is created a boom for the boomer generation. I actually go quite hard on boomers, no offence to based boomers watching, but what they did by doing that was people under the age of 60 who had mortgages, you’re shafted. You’re an extra 5% a year interest, you know, 5% on 100 grand, five grand, 200 grand, that’s ten grand.

 

Whereas if you’re sitting there with a decent enough nest egg.

 

So what they’ve done is they’ve done that and they’ve screwed this generation.

 

And as you say, Mark, about the private schooling as well, is for a lot of people, the choice is a local comprehensive school in a diverse area, or you pay a bit extra.

 

And the thing is, that’s actually a very regressive policy on private schools, because when you do that, it subsidizes a place for someone else, actually benefits the state system.

 

And again, it is what you find with the people like Starmer and the people behind him is it really is race to the bottom stuff. It will be about equality and diversity.

 

Whereas at least, dare I say, Blairism. Blairism at least got the more aspirational aspect of this country that he got Thatcherism, whereas with Starmer, his career, he’s been director of public prosecutions. Very banal. And they don’t want anybody to be in. Like they probably another thing they’ll do, and I know a lot of people watching this will do, is they’ll probably ban home-schooling, because if they hate you sending your kids to a private school, though, they would hate you even more that you’re educating your own kids.

 

I mean, that, I think should be another cause for concern. They would say:

 

“These kids might be getting taught far-Right propaganda at home, and they’re not getting the same.”

 

So they’ll start with private schools, then it’ll be home-schooling, and then it’ll be faith schools as well, until it’s just bog standard comprehensives preaching the gospel according to Starmer.

 

Mark Collett: So does anyone else want to comment on any of that before we move on to the man, the myth, the legend, Nigel Farage? Because that’s where this is going.

 

Now, Farage has come out of nowhere, and from a guy who at the beginning of this election, wrote an open letter to the public saying he wouldn’t be standing, he now seems to have been reactivated to the point where either he was playing an amazing game or the state needed him to do this. It’s one or the other.

 

Now, on one hand, you could say the state needed him because they want to smash the Tories and grant Labour this year, huge majority, to take us to war.

 

But on the other hand, he has played a very good game. And look, I’m not his biggest fan, but you’ve got to grant credit to a Smooth Operator when it’s due. And apparently, allegedly. Supposedly, when he left the Brexit Party, it has been said to me by several people that he took in the region of 18 and a half million pounds because it was his company, he took it with him. He said that was his money, it was his severance, etcetera. No one stopped him doing this. And I don’t believe there’s any litigation against him. I don’t believe he’s technically done anything illegal.

 

If it is true that he did this, and then he used that money, apparently, allegedly, supposedly, to buy his way into things like GB News. He’s effectively now, whilst retaining full control over the Brexit Party because he is the sole director of it and it is a company.

 

And then he uses GB News to pump out, 24 hours a day, Nigel Farage, publicity broadcasts and boom! What have you got? It’s almost like I’ve got the name of the damn film now.

 

David Clews: Orson Welles in Citizen Kane.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, almost like Citizen Game, where he buys up the media to get himself elected. This guy has used his money, he’s used his power, he’s got the Daily Express on his side, he’s got GB News running constant reels. The BBC and other groups are having to wheel him out, because if they don’t, no one’s going to watch the debates. I mean, no one cares about Angela Reyna, some low IQ chav debating with Penny Mordant to some relatively yummy mummy, middle class housewife.

 

I mean, that’s just mild titillation as best. They want Farage on there, ripping them a new one so they can’t ignore him.

 

And what’s more, they’ve made him what he is, a little bit like they made Trump by putting him on. I’m a celebrity by building him up when he wasn’t doing the politics. It let him come back even bigger, tougher, more relatable, more lovable than he was before. I believe the milkshake thing was a setup to get him sympathy and get him talked about. There’s pictures of him and that girl hugging each other when she’s., … You know, on that day, she looked like a scruffy little chap that no one would have got on with. The night when she’s hugging him. The night when she’s hugging him. And she met him before in a beautiful dress, hair done, nice, makeup all done properly. She looks like the kind of girl he might have on his arm the casino or something.

 

And to me, it looks like a mixture of him playing his cards very well, a little bit of maybe contrivance and the system having to build somebody up to make the election interesting.

 

But I think Farage is pulling it out the bag.

 

But I’m not sure whether he will get the electoral gains that you would think he would deserve for the amount of publicity he’s getting.

 

What are your thoughts on Farage and on his prospects? Natty?

 

Natty: Well, I think this is a lesson and unfortunately, the Americans have not learnt this, and you’ve put a lot of detail in there, and it’s very well done, and you’re absolutely correct on all of it. But you take a slightly more bird’s eye view on this is a lesson, unfortunately, the Americans haven’t learnt yet, despite Trump betraying them. I think we in Europe are still going to have to learn this, which is why our fortunes are not going to change in the next 5, 10, 15 years, possibly that far out. But he goes to America, meets up with Trump, comes back, and all of a sudden, the playbook is almost exactly the same as Trump in 2016. He’s probably got the same type of money behind him, and we would be looking at the same sort of betrayal if Farage did get in.

 

Now, he’s obviously not going to become the prime minister, not in this election cycle, in the next election cycle, if Labour are really going to be as unpopular as we think they are. Possibly. But at that point, we have to then learn exactly what the Americans failed to learn with Trump and what the French are going to have to learn with Marine Le Pen and the Germans, possibly with AfD, and that Reform isn’t good enough and Reform isn’t going to save us. I don’t know what is yet.

 

But it’s trying to keep a decrepit and rusty train on the tracks using dog whistles and red meat, tastier red meat, than you’re going to get with the Tories, for sure. But unfortunately, for all the excitement and to read Nigel Farage’s manifesto, I know it’s not called that, it’s called a “Contract”. And it’s very easy to write something like that when you’re not staring down in the face of power. But to read that even someone like me, who can’t stand Farage, and I know the history of Farage, even me reading that is like, this is amazing!

 

But like I said, it would have to be a lesson that we would have to learn, and it’s going to be a hard lesson.

 

Mark Collett: Tollah, your thoughts?

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, well, I mean, you mentioned there about Farage probably playing a smart game and being controlled intelligently as well, and some combination of, too. But he’s probably not. There’s still not a great likelihood that Reform are going to get enough seats in Parliament to exert much influence. And I mean, look, even if they did, again, they would be controlled to a greater degree than they are now and to as great a degree as the powers that be need, really, and First Past the Post is the perennial obstacle to that, to any insurgent candidate or party really exerting much influence over even the discourse in this country, because discourse and kind of the Overton Window is the only thing that ever really seems to get influenced, influenced.

 

But then again, and acknowledging that even with that, Farage is possibly somewhat controlled. I mean, to the degree that you can probably have some idiot true believer who’s the head of whatever. I mean, he was banking with Coots, wasn’t he, when he got debunked? But coots are owned by one of the big sort of they were owned by Nat west or something, and it was some senior executive there. He’s probably some idiot true believer who’s not in on the whole thing, has signed off on him, having his bank account taken off him, and then it’s come back to like, well, no, no, no, you don’t do that to him. You do that to these far-Right people, you do that to White nationalists, you do that to people from Patriotic Alternative and so on and so forth.

 

But, yeah, I mean, Farage somewhat controlled and somewhat of an asset that we would appear to be. I mean, bearing in mind, whether consciously or not, because, I mean, he’s obviously sort of proud to proclaim how UK sort of were a massive spoke in the wheels of the British National Party 15 to 20 years ago.

 

However, what people miss is the fact that they were then promoted for that purpose. They were promoted by the establishment. That’s why the idiots, the mushrooms, or the vegetables, as I like to call them, the rank and file regime loyalist liberals would be in paroxysms of rage about Farage. Why is Farage on Question Time again? Farage is on there so that they can boast for more support for UKIP, so that that gets in the way of the British National Party, gets in the way of the thing that you’ve really being conditioned to be afraid of the genuine article. Farage is a bit of a scarecrow.

 

But, I mean, even then, unless you believe that the powers that be wanted Brexit, and in the end, even if they didn’t think it eight, nine years ago, they’ve probably been given this and we’ve seen enough evidence to show that they could have been more or less indifferent about it, because it’s got us none of what we would have wanted. UKIP under Farage, despite only winning one seat in the First Past the Post system did a lot to force the referendum which led to Brexit.

 

But again, when that kind of thing happens, like you know, if, say, Le Pen gets elected in France, they can control them enough that nothing ever really happens. Same with Trump in America. Nothing, you know, nothing that the native White population ever really want that really matters is ever allowed to happen. And barring any kind of political rupture, I think we are stuck with that.

 

David Clews: Yeah.

 

I mean, the way I kind of describe it is what we’re really viewing is a pantomime or some theatre, and it tends to be the people that direct the films in Hollywood direct this pantomime as well.

 

So when you’re, if you look at it that way, there will be some characters that you really identify with. There will be characters that get really angry and walk off stage every so often, but they’re still part of the same play, they’re still part of the same nexus and power structure. So it’s always important to recognise that.

 

And I think there is a level of pragmatism you do need to have and say:

 

“Well, look, this is the system that we’re in. You have to work within the confines of it.”

 

But I am much more negative about Farage because I think he is there for a very specific reason.

 

And I think that October 7 was such a pivotal moment in history. And Farage has been brought in to co-opt the genuine anger, the Right-wing support for potentially upcoming conflicts with Iran or whoever. And Farage, if you look at old Farage, Farage knows the score. He knows who pulls the strings. He talked regularly about Soros. He would talk about, he was much more sympathetic to Putin, doesn’t do any of that now. You know, he is very focused.

 

And I had our guest on Kathryn Blakelock the other night, who’s certainly taken an interesting turn recently. And she was like:

 

“Well I’m not really into geopolitics. I’m more worried about the potholes and Greater Yarmouth.”

 

And I’m like:

 

“Well like, geopolitics is really everything here and the power structure and so many people are still stuck five years ago. They’ve not moved on.”

 

And it’s the same with Trump. Like, the big thing for me about Trump was this hundred million donation that Trump’s got from (((Miriam Adelson))). You don’t get given 100 million by Miriam Adelson, who is the richest woman in Israel, owns the casinos, if you’re just going to be a nice guy and put the interests of White Americans first, that’s the money.

 

And then all of Wall Street is now behind Donald Trump as well, Bill Ackman, Steven Schwartzman at Blackstone, even Larry Fink, even the ADL have given the nod. So I see this as all the pieces being put into place.

 

And I think Farage is a key part of that because he will represent the sort of contain the Right-wing anger that there may be. He will be a Churchill figure, if you’re using the analogy. Again, he will act as that “I’m patriotic, I love this country”, etcetera. He’ll play that role, and he’ll play it very well, and people will subscribe to it. Again, we can look at it on a short term vote Reform to give the Tories a kick. Fine.

 

But I think with Farage in Parliament, I think he’ll have a very, very specific role to play. He is, again, he wants to be part of the establishment. Like, I watched all the royal coverage. Farage was there at the Coronation, all the wonderful patriotism. King Charles, like, he is only gonna take things so far. He will do what needs to be done, whether it’s because he’s blackmailed, compromised financial, or maybe he just, he just wants the title.

 

And again, the other thing that I think we sometimes forget is a lot of these people have blackmail on them. Like, you know, we don’t work or live in these circles. You know, a lot of these people have done a lot of things in the past. They’ve been a lot of places. It’s such a murky, murky, murky world, and we only see a very, very shallow part of it.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I’ll say one thing, and this is partially about what my video’s about on Friday, so I don’t want to go into it. I’m going to lay out in my video all the reasons, all the sort of evidence I’ve got, Farage not being us, but he is talking our talking points. You know, when we put together these campaigns about stop the boats, deport all illegal immigrants, I didn’t think Farage would take that point on verbatim.

 

Yet he has.

 

And I’ve got to say this for me personally, I believe the more radical Right has had a profound effect on this election, because our constant badgering of people, our constant banner drops, leafleting, pressure that we’ve put on, seems to have driven people like Farage into new territory. We’ve pulled the Overton Window in our direction, and I’ll actually present evidence of this in my video on Friday.

 

But if you look at what Farage is standing on, it’s actually a more radical platform than what the BNP stood on in 2009 at the European election. I did the videos. I did the leaflets back then and the leaflets back then were not heavy on the anti-immigration. They were putting British people first, British jobs for British workers. They did say “no to immigration” boldly on there, but they didn’t say anything about deporting illegals or rounding anyone up. Farage is unironically being forced to fight this election on a more ethno-nationalist re-migration platform than we ever did.

 

David Clews: But again, they can do that.

 

The Ayatollah: No. And they’re never going to get voted in.

 

David Clews: Sorry, but do you not think that they’re doing that on purpose to try and, like, destroy, like someone like yourself? The people here, our viewers, who are genuine nationalists, of course they’re doing it because of that.

 

Mark Collett: But the fact they’ve been forced to do that.

 

David Clews: Yeah, it’s true. It’s a black pill and a white pill at the same time. You know, I’m not saying.

 

Mark Collett: I’m not saying it’s going to get us to power, but for them to start using nakedly ethno-national, like, deportations, remigration, all of that, once you start talking about net numbers, Net Zero-500,000 these are the discussions taking place. But these aren’t the discussions of civn ats in 2016. They’re the discussions of ethno-nationalists that we have been absolutely staunch on.

 

And I just wanted to ask you all whether. Is that a little bit of a silver lining to the cloud of what is clearly, you know, controlled opposition?

 

Natty: Absolutely!

 

But with the caveat that you just do not rest on your laurels. You just have to be uncompromising on this idea that we are being ethnically cleansed.

 

However, whatever definition you want to use, it is happening. It’s happened to the Cockneys, it’s happened to the Brummies, it’s happened to the people of Leeds and Leicester. That is happening! Be uncompromising on that and be uncompromising on calling out jewish supremacy. And the power of the tiny ethnic group seems to hold just all of our governments under total power, basically.

 

So just don’t bend on these and look what happens. You do force, you do change opinions, you do force people to come around. You’re right. 2016 was a different time. It was meme worthy and Brexit and all the rest of it. But there have been certain people who have just held the line on these ideas.

 

And in a way you’re right, it has worked and it is depressing to see like David said, it’s a double edged sword. You see these talking points taken up by people who were just doing it for the grift and are just doing it to contain, but nevertheless, they had to pick them up anyway and had to pick them up and use them to gain popular support.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah. I mean, while sort of politically aware White nationalists, and I say politically aware White nationalists, I’m talking about us because we’re aware of the fact that on certain things, large swathes of the population agree with us, but they’re kind of still what we would call “normies”.

 

And I’ve always been fond of the line that a normie is someone who can say have some sound instincts, but say:

 

“Well, we’re all one race, the human race. But Enoch Powell was right!”

 

In the same sentence because that’s what sort of normal people are like. They’re kind of suggestible to the last compelling, the last thing they heard that sounded compelling and authoritative. But while we’re sort of smaller in number than we would like to be the case, small groups of people who kind of understand what’s going on and make a lot of noise have an outsized impact.

 

And I think you can see the legacy of things they obviously didn’t want to happen and didn’t want to have to contain in ways they did more in terms of rhetoric than anything, rather than anything that happened electorally. But you have got stuff like Brexit and that adjacent to it in sort of the middle of the last decade, we’re going back nearly ten years now. It’s 2015, 2016. And you could actually see this. It probably illustrated all the better not by all of the reaction, but by part of the reaction. Certainly the reaction on the American sort of kosher right to October 7. The Left is another matter that’s basically entirely of the jews own creation through the anti-White agenda and the kind of the victim of hierarchy and all the rest of it.

 

The way the Left reacted is entirely, you know, something they created blown up in their face, which is something to sort of villainise and demonise and attack White people, however, in the way that they just can’t contain the Right, in the way they used to. In the kind of reactions you see to particularly US military recruitment videos. Yeah, I don’t want to die for Israel. You know, they put a load of White men and adverts for the army and the Rangers and whatever else, the Marines. And the comments are just all basically people like us, people probably not as radical as us, but people that are aware of the idea that, yeah, you know, sold that for a game of soldiers, if you give the expression, I’m not dying for Israel. Yeah, it’s had an impact. It’s definitely had an impact that they wouldn’t want to have to contain.

 

I mean, I always say this like, the thing is, the problem is with each round of gatekeeping, they have to kind of hold the gate slightly more ajar. And you’re always going to get the large majority of the people the wrong side of the gate are not going to get through. But the people with the most initiative, some of them will make it through because they’ve to have a sort of a perception, like perceived legitimacy. They’ve got to hold the gate ajar a little bit. And that basically, in practical terms, just means, like, rhetorical concessions. And, yeah, to a degree, they do sanitize some of our talking points.

 

But if they wanted to be using them, they’d have been using them all along, and they haven’t been. I mean, Tommy Robinson was on record saying this last week, wasn’t he? No chance! Posted it on Twitter on X. You know, saying, like, Tommy Robinson was basically saying:

 

“The reason I talk about the White replacement agenda is because the only people that do it otherwise are all, they’re anti-semitic!”

 

Yeah. Because, of course, the great priority for any White political activist is to prevent, you know, criticism of and dissatisfaction with a foreign group of people who basically hold a grossly disproportionate amount of power and ultimately have the final say on pretty much everything naturally.

 

Mark Collett: But, yeah, so what Tollah is saying in the politest and kindest way is that’s the, that’s the polite and kind way to kick me in the bollocks and say, Mark, you spent your whole life crusading for something that you were absolutely right about, but these shills are going to Nick it off you at the last minute, run with it and get all the credit. So there you have it.

 

But that’s what happens when you have a system with contingency. That’s a system with contingency. They have a contingency for everything, and their contingencies control opposition.

 

But one last thing I’ll say about fo this is just my personal take. I do love seeing a different candidate coming out in the news every day for saying something nice about Hitler or the Third Reich. It’s like, you know what?

 

David Clews: Is interesting about that because for when Tice was in charge. They were so cucked to everyone, they basically, they buckled.

 

Whereas when Farage came in, they’ve actually been. It was when the guy said that we shouldn’t have got involved in the Second World War. Reform actually initially put out a press release saying:

 

“Well, that was actually a widely held opinion by many people in the 1930s.”

 

And all of this stuff is very helpful in the Overton Window.

 

And again, it’s like Farage was talking with more on Susanna Reed and Ed Balls, and he was talking about. He said:

 

“Look, he disagrees, etcetera, you know, we did the right thing.”

 

But then Farage did actually say at the end, he says:

 

“But I mean, all that guy was doing was expressing an opinion.”

 

And that’s the thing again, about Farage is like, I think deep down, like, Farage wouldn’t put us in jail for talking about the things that we talk about. Nigel Farage wouldn’t jail you for putting up “It’s okay to be White” stickers, right?

 

We will obviously be very critical of Nigel Farage, but he’s not like Keir Starmer, he’s not like Hope Not Hate, he’s not like the psychopaths that will be around the Tory Party or even the Labour Party. So it’s.

 

I think a lot of people will just have that pragmatic approach to. And say:

 

“Well, look, he’s, he is where he is.”

 

And again, you saw the audience the other night, had Clark.

 

I mean, we’re all probably, what, late thirties, early forties is the only people that really vote on mass are the 60 plus generation. That’s who votes. Like, by and large, the people don’t vote as much under the age of 60, so they have to pander to that boomer generation, they have to do everything. And really, Farage, Farage, I mean, he’s so kind, like, he goes to a pub, like, everyone laughs, you know, he’s infectious and you just, you can’t take that away from him. He is clearly the number one political performer as is Donald Trump. As I say, unfortunately, they’re acting and being paid for by the wrong people.

 

Mark Collett: We’ve got two more questions for you, then we’ll do the Superchats. If you haven’t Superchatted yet, or if you like the stream and think we deserve a donation, please consider doing so. but two very quick questions.

 

The first is about George Galloway. David Clews, best mate. I actually like George and I actually think, look, I got a lot of flack a while back. I’m not going to make this into a monologue, but I got a lot of flack a while back for saying it was a good thing that he got elected.

 

A lot of people in my comments calling me a cuck, I said both the Tory Party and the Labour Party need destroying with new alternatives on both the Right and the Left, which were both of which were willing to talk about different issues. I thought Galloway fulfilled that point, but I don’t think he’s going to get re-elected in Rochdale. I think the entire establishment’s coming down on him.

 

If you’ve seen the stuff on my page today, he’s talking about suing Hope Not Hate. He’s saying that they’ve literally pulled everything out of the bag to destroy his party in Rochdale. That the increased turnout and the fact he’d be up against the Labour candidate this time when he wasn’t last time. I think, sadly, he’s going to lose his seat and I think that’s going to be a bad thing because I was disappointed with his party’s performance. Farage came out there stood 609 of the 632 mainland seats, but Galloway only stood 125. That’s still a good look, still a good effort. It’s still a lot more than any ethno-nationalist group did. But he was initially saying he was going to stand over 500. And look, I’m not putting him down because I wanted him to stand more. I was just disappointed. There isn’t that alternative for Labour voters that there is for the Tory voters. I don’t know what your thoughts are on Galloway, but I do wish him all the best. But unfortunately, I don’t think he’s got he hasn’t come out with the numbers.

 

Natty: The Labour alternative seems to be the Green party, which is just dead on arrival.

 

I mean, it’s really sandalwares and juice drinkers voting for the Green party. You know, I can’t vote for Keir Starmer type of people. No, Galloway is good. I mean, you got to look at Galloway as an instrument of destruction as opposed to anything else. And the only, this is a this is a very basic test. But who receiving the hardest when Galloway won? Zionists. And if Zionists deceiving. You know, it can’t always be a bad thing! You know, the enemy of my enemy, and all the rest of it.

 

So, yeah, I’m pro-Galloway. It will be a shame if he loses just having him out in front out in the public view. It is in the same way as Farage dropping ethno-nationalist talking points.

 

And if you remember, Galloway was nodding to racial politics in his election.

 

So that’s a good sign. That’s a good sign. >As far as I’m concerned.

 

David Clews: George Galloway is, as a performer, but I mean, he is a bit older now. I actually think he might be nearly. Let me actually just look up exactly what, what?

 

Mark Collett: He is in his seventies, mate.

 

David Clews: Yeah. You know what, he might even be nearly 80, I think.

 

Let me just actually double check that.

 

The Ayatollah: He’s only 69. You know?

 

David Clews: He’s only 69? I thought he was older.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah.

 

David Clews: Do, you know, why? The reason he wears the hat most of the time. Do the reason behind that? He actually got a really bad kick in from a jewish guy in London. He got beaten up really, really badly and he’s got like a big bruise on his head.

 

So, yeah, he got a real kick in. I think Natty’s point was accurate. Who was seething the most about Galloway? And that’s when member Sunak came out and gave the speech and the former Nick Griffin backed him. And this guy’s so dangerous! I think, on geopolitics, George Galloway has been really correct over the last 30 years on his geopolitics. He was right about the Iraq war, he was right about Afghanistan, he was right about Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria. He has been outstanding on geopolitics. But George Galloway is also a kind of creation of the post 1945 mythos. And he does view the world through a Marxist prism of politics. I’ve interviewed a few of the people from the Workers Party and they’re all really nice people.

 

And again, when it comes to the war issue, I get on really well with them and we’re all anti-war, but they still, like, they have this weird take on why people do things. And obviously, I think it’s wrong, but it will be a shame to see Galloway not doing well. But I think he was caught off guard. And the reality is most sort of Left-wingers out there who are busy enough to get involved will be kind of, hate to say the word, but “woke”, you know, Galloway stuff would cut through to the public.

 

But it’s a tough one. And for him.

 

And at the same time, you know, he does, a lot of people on the Right find it hard to support Galloway because he does play the Muslim vote. You see pictures of him down the mosque and he’s surrounded by hundreds of people from Pakistan. The optic is a tough, it’s a tough one for Galloway to do because a lot of people, the other point.

 

Natty: Is that the old Red Wall, the Corbinistas, you could, you could appeal to them that immigration is bad because they’re basically scab Labour, destroying the hard working gains of the Labour movement of the last 150 years. Unfortunately, George Galloway is not strong on that.

 

So there’s a whole tranche of people out there who could be stolen from Labour in exactly that way.

 

David Clews: I always say that mass migration is a “tool of the cat”, to use Marxist parlance. It is a tool of the capitalist classes. You’re correct. You’re scabbing like Keir Hardy, who founded the Labour Party. He actually led numerous walkouts in the coal mines because they were bringing in Lithuanian coal miners. If you are a Leftist, or a communist, you should be against free movement because it suppresses wages and it overly benefits the capitalist classes. But like, as you say, Galloway, the thing about mass migration is for a lot of reasons, sort of the Left, so to speak, they just, they love it. They think they enrichment, like, they love multiculturalism. So it’s such a hard nut to crack amongst that demographic of the population.

 

The Ayatollah: One of the things I had in my notes for tonight, if it were going to come up and it kind of, it didn’t in the way I might have thought it would. And it’s a point I’ve made before about the trade unions. The same thing applies to the Labour Party because in theory, they were founded to represent the same interest, the interest of working people. And it just relates to the fact that obviously we’re pretty unanimous in wanting to see the absolute destruction of the Tory Party now, just because of pure spite of what they presided over over the last 14 years.

 

I mean, their treachery goes back much further than that, as it does with Labour, when we sort of the terms in which that’s couched, like, well, look at the horrors the Tories have inflicted upon us for this past 14 years, always either explicitly stated with that or taken as read is, well, they’re supposed to be the ones that look after us. We know Labour will betray us and ethically cleanse us. That’s the Labour Party we’re talking about again, established to represent and govern on behalf of working people.

 

Yet we take it as read that they will be more treacherous than the party of the rich, which is basically what the Tories are.

 

I mean, that tells you first, not that any of us need telling, how utterly poisoned all of our institutions are by the occupation under which we live.

 

But, I mean, it’s funny, David, you mentioned the Labour Party, a one time campaign against the import of Lithuanian miners and that kind of thing. I knew somebody who was a Labour councilor on the south coast at one time and he gave it up basically in the midst of the mid 2010s because of how anti-White they were and because he was becoming more of a nationalist. And he referenced that.

 

And then also that actually reminds me of, funny enough, there’s no Reform candidate standing in my constituency because whoever was standing is utterly spineless. He was worried that Labour might actually beat the Tories in this constituency. So he’s not standing. They can’t put anyone else up now because it’s passed the legal sort of time limit.

 

But I’m going to vote for the SDP in my constituency. Very, very small party, but the Social Democrats are basically a little bit like what blue Labour promised.

 

But, I think that was always a controlled opposition thing as well because it’s run by somebody called Maurice Glassman, but they’re kind of like old Left social Conservatives, anti-immigration and so on.

 

But, yeah, no Reform candidate where I am, but there is an SDP candidate.

 

Natty: Just get blue balls and a blue and white flag. Hey, Tollah.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, exactly, mate. Yeah, yeah. Speaking of which, there’s been a score in the football, but anyway, I won’t spoil that for anyone if they’re trying to avoid it.

 

Mark Collett: Right, guys, one last question. And Natty, Tollah’s already ruined it by answering it by mistake. Who are you all going to vote for, if you don’t mind saying? I’ll say, I don’t think I’ve got an English Democrat, or a British Democrat in my constituency. I’ll likely vote Reform just because it’ll be the only thing on the ballot paper that represents anything like my views.

 

And I’ll be voting that as a way to thumb my nose at both Labour and the Tories whilst still going out and voting and not being one of those bums who just sits home and does nothing and allows the rest to say:

 

“Oh, well, you don’t count in the statistics.”

 

What about you, Natty?

 

Natty: Yeah, Reform. There are a couple of independents down here in my constituency who are good as well. But to kick the Tories and kick Labour again, like you said, it’s Reform.

 

Mark Collett: Tollah said SDP. What about you, David?

 

David Clews: Well, I’m going to be. I’m in a purity spiral here.

 

And I’m not voting. I just find the whole thing a farce, to be honest.

 

Mark Collett: Are you going to go and spoil your ballot paper?

 

David Clews: No, I’m not even going to do that. Because that’s in dot. That’s all right. If I was running the show, I would say the best thing to have is nobody voting. Because then the regime has no legitimacy.

 

But obviously people aren’t going to do that.

 

But it’s so stupid. Like, you go in, you tick a wee box. I think they want that because it legitimizes them. Democracy lends legitimacy.

 

Mark Collett: Now, I’m quite the opposite.

 

And I’ll tell you why. If you had 98% of the voter in public went and wrote all rubbish on their ballot paper, they’d have to say the Labour candidate was elected with 1.2% of the vote.

 

And I think that would be a problem for legitimacy. Far more than Labour were elected with 52% of the vote. 90% stayed at home, though.

 

David Clews: I just think the whole democracy. Democracy is a scam!

 

I mean, that was one of the I was reading about the Dune novels and one of the things they said about it is how Frank Herbert showed that people will intrinsically return to basic form. I mean, democracy is, I think, in years to come, people look back and say, what was that all about? For hundreds of thousands of years, you had a leader and you had a people and that was basically it. If you went back 200 years ago and said:

 

“Well, what are you Left-wing? Are you Right-wing? Are you conservative?”

 

They’d be like:

 

“What? I’m out working to put food on my table!”

 

Personally, I think democracy is used as a tool of subversion.

 

Whereas it should be really the strongest in society should rule. And if somebody else wants to come along and overthrow them, then they have to be stronger.

 

But again, look, maybe I’m a bit black pilled by White. I don’t knock people who still vote. I understand why they still do it. It’s like if you look at dissidents during movement, say dissidents in East Germany, like, people still stayed, they still worked, you know, they put out books in their spare time, you know, you. I would be the one jumping over the wall and sitting in West Berlin smoking a cigar, like, do you know what I mean?

 

So I’m not going to be a complete dickhead. I understand why people vote, but I personally think that it’s wrong and it legitimizes the corruption of the system.

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, different answers there. Me and Natty, obviously the same, but Tollah is voting. David’s not all legitimate answers. It’s up to every person. I always advise. If there’s not a nationalist candidate, spoil your ballot paper.

 

But I think it’s better to have a say than just to be a guy that stayed at home. But everyone’s entitled to their own opinions.

 

Let’s do these Superchats. If you haven’t Superchatted, there’s still 45 minutes of the show left.

 

Obviously, we might run over five minutes if we get too many. I’m hoping not to run over by a long period because these guys are here and it’s boiling hot. It’s about 25 degrees in this room and I feel like I’m about to melt. Open Borders for Israel, $5.

 

The Ayatollah: Thanks so much.

 

Mark Collett: He said:

 

“Did you see the US government designated Nordic Resistant Movement as a terrorist group?”

 

We’ll go around the group on this very quickly. I saw that. I’m sure everyone else did. I find this utterly disgusting! The Nordic Resistance are a registered party in Sweden. They stand in elections and they’ve just been like:

 

“Whoa! Well, there you go. They’re terrorists!”

 

Absolutely scandalous.

 

But I think one of the reasons behind that is to stop international resistance forming. Because now there isn’t any nationalist group in America who can support the Nordic Resistance. Because if they do you know, if they Superchat to a Nordic Resistance, show anything like that could lead to them being prosecuted for supporting a terrorist group. But absolutely scandalous! And the guy who’s done it is obviously Anthony Blinken, who is jewish. Again, it’s jewish power flexing its muscles to attack any form of resistance. What do the rest of you guys think on this?

 

Natty: It definitely has the fear of ZOG lashing out blindly. I’m not sure. Maybe there are machinations I don’t understand. But like you said, they’re a registered party in Sweden, so this just seems really silly to me. And you’re right, it does cut that tie between America and Europe.

 

But I just get the impression that ZOG is just fighting on too many fronts and it’s struggling to contain it. And a move like this, to me, just reeks of that desperation and stupidity.

 

The Ayatollah: Yes, I’ve not got a lot to say. Your summary of it is correct. Mark, just to elaborate or just to add a bit to what Nat is saying there, I think the concern for the current occupation in terms of using everything as a vassal for Israeli interests and jewish interests is certainly Israeli interests geopolitically in that they haven’t got either the young Left or the young Right under control. They had the Right 25 years ago in that age group. They haven’t now. They’re going to probably not find it that easy to get it back, and they’re certainly not going to have the Left. I think that is a big concern from just picking up on what Nat was saying about fighting on too many fronts. That’s a problem that isn’t going to go away. It’s only going to get worse.

 

David Clews: Yeah, I mean, it’s just ridiculous banning these groups.

 

I mean, the problem is it does work because the media are calling them a “terror group”.

 

Therefore, the vast majority of people will read all, a terrorist group’s been banned. It’s a bit like the way they’ve done that here as well with all these, like, even, like his boot to rear. Like, I mean, obviously I’m not a fan of his boot to rear, but they weren’t terrorist group. The band, them, like, they’ll just keep throwing this around and mud sticks at the end of the day and most people will just see the superficial. Well, the band, a terrorist group, one of their members once knew somebody who went somewhere and spoke it breathed air just like Anders Behring Breivik, you know, that’s. They know exactly the game to play. They just throw enough mud out there.

 

But as Natty said, it is a very good point. Like, all the fronts that are being fought on a war in Gaza, war with Hezbollah in the north, a war with people over there, a war with Iran. It is more like the machinations of someone lashing out than someone who’s in power and really in control.

 

Mark Collett: Well, thank you for that. JakesChannel gave $5 and says:

 

“What a fantastic lineup. Cannot wait to watch. Thanks for putting on a great show, Mark.”

 

Well, thank you for supporting it. Jakes, really nice to see you here tonight. D sound seven gave $10. Thank you so much, my friend. He said:

 

“Conservatives delenda est!”

 

Or is it delenda est? Conservatives.

 

I can’t remember which way round the Latin goes, but basically he’s saying:

 

“Death to the Conservatives!”

 

Well, I think that may be happening. And you will see the last thing the Conservatives will see is the grinning face of Nigel Farage as he pours mud into their open grave. Merry Englander gave $5 and said:

 

“Greetings all!”

 

Thank you so much! AlbionForever said:

 

“Don’t forget Tollah is also a rapper. There might be somebody requesting some Tollah rap later.”

 

I don’t know, but that might happen. RoryHerbert gave $5. Thank you so much!:

 

“Just a thought. Mark Collett, I would appreciate your comments on Just Stop Oil spraying orange paint on Stonehenge earlier today. I’ve got a lot of respect for the woman who intervened.”

 

What is the panel’s opinion? I’m going to Fed post now, so if you want to leave the panel, you can.

 

But I got to say this. If I was at Stonehenge with my family and I saw people spraying orange paint over something that’s, I don’t know when it was built. I don’t know when Stonehenge was built, but it was a long time ago and it’s an integral part of our culture. It’s a historic landmark that inspires all the world over. And if I saw these daft idiots spraying it orange, I think I’d run over and punch one of them.

 

And anyone that does run over and punch one of these people who are destroying priceless works of European art, destroying cultural, historical sites, they deserve having a pint bought for them, not being prosecuted.

 

So yeah, my advice is, if you see them, I will buy you a pint. If you punch them. If you see somebody destroying Stonehenge, it’s your moral duty to stop them.

 

Natty: Let me just say as well, I mean, as shocking as it is, it shouldn’t be surprising the people responsible for this have destroyed or attempting to destroy our history, our culture and our people. Cultural vandalism is just small fry to them. And the people who did this work for a lady called Margaret Klein, Salomon. Okay. She’s jewish, so that’s all I’m going to say.

 

David Clews: Yeah, I think with a lot of these psy ops, I think with a lot of them, it’s actually best to ignore them because there’s so many of them now. Like, they’re always up to stuff. These Just Stop Oil people, I think obviously if they engage in criminal damage, they should be arrested.

 

But I think the media actually deliberately pushes Just Stop Oil because that’s part of the net. The Net Zero agenda is to stop oil. So people do stuff all the time. The media will always push Just Stop Oil. They’ll always push these stupid stunts.

 

I think the best thing for these people is to not give them the oxygen of publicity.

 

And I think the fact that the media does give them so much publicity, I think it’s part of the wider Net Zero, because then they can say:

 

“Well, look, people are so outraged that the lack of moves towards a sustainable, decarbonised economy.”

 

And like the one I noticed, like Ash Sarkar, like the stuff she says as well, these people are the suffragettes of the 21st century and like Owen Jones will use that one as well.

 

So they’re these Just Stop Oil people are actually doing the bidding of the state because they agree with kind of the same things, but yet lock them up and throw away the key.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, I posted about this earlier when I saw it and basically just. I put it quite simply, I said, if you polled native Britons, I reckon about a third of them would be in favour of people like that. I’ll put it more politely than it is on Telegram being tried and then publicly executed under a benevolent state. I really do. That’s how angry it makes people. That’s how much contempt people have for it because it’s not a popular agenda in the first place. Setting aside, and yeah, David may well have a point. Setting aside, know David’s kind of ideas.

 

And again, he may well be right as to why this is promoted as much as it is. The question I would have there is why the kind of idea of and I’d be open to. Not the discussion for now, but I’d be open to kind of theories on this. Why the effort to kind of get publicity for this through something which is massively unpopular, you would think it’d be counterproductive. But maybe there’s a long game there that like, is beyond my comprehension. It may well be.

 

David Clews: All publicity is good publicity. I think it’s like a suffragette style situation. What was Emily Pankhurst? She threw herself in front of the horse. Everyone would have been whereas now she’s a hero. So I think. Yeah, yeah. About Emily Pankhurst, though, I’ll tell you.

 

Mark Collett: This, the day just stop wheel, go and vandalise an actual state building or.

 

Natty: You know, Holocaust memorial.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, a Holocaust memorial or something like that. That’ll be the day they start arresting them. You know, when they go to the Holocaust memorial, the local synagogue, the local mosque, that’s when they’re arresting them, when they’re doing it to churches. Stonehenge, European works of art. It’s all fun and games before because the system hates us. Simpler, ItWasMadeUp, gave 1488. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“Great lineup!”

 

Well, thank you so much! Stan1 gave $14. Thanks so much, said:

 

“Great show and great guests. As my granddad once said, embrace the struggle, enjoy the decline!”

 

Thank you so much! ThinRedLine said:

 

“Very interesting.”

 

$14. Thank you so much, my friend. And Eddie gave $16 and said:

 

“Thanks for the stream. Great lineup.”

 

Well, thank you so much! ThinRedLine gave $5, said:

 

“This should be an extra long show.”

 

Well, thank you so much, my friend.

 

Natty: Hold on, hold on. I’ve just had a thought, Mark. You know, you could make about 20% extra on Superchats if we changed 14.88 to 25.66 or something. You know, maybe you’d make $5 a Superchat instead of 14.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah, yeah. Maybe we could go even further. 44, 55 or something.

 

David Clews: The problem will be inflation. It will soon be worth, like, nothing. You know, that’s the or it’ll be 1488 quid they’ll have to give you to make it worthwhile.

 

The Ayatollah: Just switch it around for now. 8814.

 

Mark Collett: Well, look, if people keep.

 

The Ayatollah: Call it on the drift again, if.

 

Mark Collett: People keep sending in questions, we will answer every question. We always do that within reason. Obviously, if people are sending in joke, you know, two Odysee token Superchats, that doesn’t count. RoryHerbert gave a dollar. Thank you so much, said:

 

“My American wife met Nigel Farage in 2015 at a UK conference and asked him who he was supporting for the 2016 US election. Nigel replied, Rand Paul. My wife replied that he should support Donald Trump. He shortly changed his mind and must have made a fair amount of money on that advice.”

 

Thank you so much, Rory. I think Farage, just as an aside, I think Farage and Trump were kind of made for each other. I think they are pretty much cut from the same cloth, and I think they’re more interested in many ways in their own sort of destiny and the power that they’re going to receive and their place in history than they are actually what they’re pushing for. And my assertion about Nigel is, I think he is somebody who feels awfully scorned because the system won’t acknowledge him.

 

And the fact the system won’t acknowledge him is something that angers him to the point that he’s now saying, I want to destroy the system to force the Conservative to acknowledge me. I think it’s his anger at the fact a lot of this is is his anger at the fact people won’t acknowledge him. But him and Trump are very similar. I think Trump only fought that first presidential election because people mocked him and said:

 

“You’ll never be able to stand for president.”

 

He was like:

 

“Well, just watch me.”

 

I think there’s a lot of ego in this.

 

David Clews: Sometimes I think I’m guilty of that as well. Like, I think maybe even these people don’t even know that they’re playing a role on the chessboard. Like, they’re doing it for a different reason. And you’re right. They said that when Trump decided to run was when. Remember, they do that roast at Washington and Obama said:

 

“That’s one thing about me is I’m president. That’s one thing you’ll never be as president.”

 

And they said after that was when Trump really, really said:

 

“I’m going to stand, that I’m going to win!”

 

And it’s used to say with Farage, like, these people love honours. Like, he’s probably embittered, he’s not a sir. And it’s such a dif, they just have a different mindset, I think, to the vast majority of us and people who are genuine, they want, it’s like Starmer with all the tool maker stuff. Like, he, remember the people started laughing when he mentioned it. The people were clearly laughing because he brings it up all the time. Starmer went on and complained. He went, I can’t believe in this day and age, people are still laughing that my daddy was a tool maker. He’s a lunatic. Starmer’s a nut job. They operate in just a completely different world, I think, from normal people.

 

Mark Collett: I agree. Does anyone want to add to that? Tollah, I’ve got you.

 

The Ayatollah: Sure?

 

Mark Collett: Unmuted.

 

The Ayatollah: No, nothing to add, mate. Nothing to add.

 

Mark Collett: Okay.

 

The Ayatollah: Just basically agreement on the point of they’re not always. Sorry, just to say they’re not always conscious of the ways in which they’re perhaps being used. Yeah, but I kind of made a similar point earlier on myself, but, yeah, I do agree with that. Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: Okay. The Resident Baker gave $10. Thank you so much!:

 

“An excellent show tonight, gentlemen.”

 

Well thank you very much, my friend, for the support. It’s Okay to be a Nationalist gave $25. Thank you so much! He said:

 

“If six pointed Starmer and his handlers are so smart, they’d reduce immigration by 5% and say to the media, we’ve reduced immigration! Normies will think he’s a messiah. Great lineup, great show!”

 

There is some debate on this, and that was a generous, supercharged, let’s just say this. There are some people who do believe that under Labour, there will be a reduction of immigration. I don’t think there will be. I think once they’re in power, all things like the like Tories would lie, at least lie and say:

 

“Look, we’re going to do the Rwanda plan, we want to stop the boat. We’re trying to reduce this.”

 

I can’t remember who it was. I think it was one of our guys wrote to their MP saying:

 

“Look, this is all a load of rubbish!”

 

And their MP wrote back and said:

 

“No, no, no. Since we brought in the Rwanda plan, you know, we’ve seen a reduction in people trying to cross the channel. This is working. Part of its a deterrent.”

 

I think once Labour are in the veneer of, we want to do something, will be completely removed. Most of their people are hardcore anti-White. Bring them all in at any cost.

 

And I think under Labour it will get worse. And the reason I believe that is because it has got worse under every successive government. If you track, you know, from the late 1970s to now, you can see an upward trend in migration. And I can’t see that turning around under a government that have done it, that when in opposition, did everything they could to basically.

 

Basically stop any form of migration control that the Tories pretended to bring in.

 

I don’t know if you guys have got any takes on that, or if.

 

Natty: You think just very quickly, over the winter, the Tories claimed that they were stopping the small boats, basically because the weather was so bad that they weren’t crossing the channel. And the lying scumbags in the Tory Party were happy to claim that as a victory.

 

So the Superchatter, I can’t remember his name is, right, yes, they could reduce it by 1%, and they would happily claim that as a kind of win that they could publish in their newspapers.

 

Mark Collett: I remember that, actually. I remember people saying:

 

“You’ve not slowed it down, all you’ve done is capitalised on the weather.”

 

David Clews: That’s one thing, David, I really nailed very early on, is the whole Hegelian dialect. Problem, reaction, solution. They create the problem, they then create the reaction, and then they provide the solution. Yeah.

 

Starmer is utterly shameless in his pursuit of power. Like, say what you want about Corbyn, Corbyn was a genuine Lefty, right? He believed in all this stuff. He wasn’t bought and paid for. He was ultimately very weak, which was why he failed to stand up to the media. But Starmer is a completely empty vessel. And even I think Starmer is even more dangerous than Blair, because Blair, there was something Machiavellian about Blair. Like, Blair loved the power, whereas with Starmer, he is this empty vessel.

 

I mean, I actually have the theory that Starmer was a closet homosexual because he didn’t marry till his forties. Both of his girlfriends he had throughout his life were both Zionists. And he was knighted.

 

And then he meets this nice Israeli lady. I think he’s been groomed for this position. And he was obvious a member of the Trilateral Commission, which is one of these big international NGO’s. He did that whole one with Emily Maitlis. Who would you prioritize, Davos or Westminster? And he said Davos. You know, he is this empty vessel that’s so easy to be shaped.

 

And I think he’s very dangerous. Starmer, more so than any of any of the rest of them.

 

The Ayatollah: Closeted homosexual. A bit like his lookalike, a certain Mr Spencer.

 

David Clews: Supposedly.

 

Natty: Hardly, hardly closeted anymore, is he?

 

The Ayatollah: Who?

 

Mark Collett: Spencer?

 

The Ayatollah: He’s not home when the rubber hits the road.

 

Natty: That’s hot stuff. You can get that at many places.

 

The Ayatollah: Is he really not as intelligent as you think you are?

 

Anyway, enough from me.

 

Mark Collett: No, he’s not.

 

David Clews: As long as there’s no kissing with tongues, it’s not gay. That’s what I heard. At least. That’s the man trial.

 

Mark Collett: What I’ve heard about Richard Spencer is that he. Quite the opposite of that. I’ve actually heard that he’s a bit of a stallion, that he’s a bit of a lady killer, that when the ladies are around big Richard, they know who’s in town. I’ll tell you. That’s what I’ve heard.

 

David Clews: I like Richard Spencer.

 

The Ayatollah: We’re not allowed to like no one else.

 

Natty: The five head herself.

 

David Clews: Richard Spencer is quite funny because the more I look back on it, when he started supporting Biden and supporting the, like, Ukraine war, I actually have a bit of respect for that because he obviously went very contrarian. So I like listening to. I think he’s very, very bright guy, but very narcissistic, though I think it’s fair to say.

 

Mark Collett: Look, I’m going to say this. I had a bit of a fallout with Richard Spencer live on air, on an episode of the Kill Stream, where we ended up in a little bit of acrimony because he been somebody who’d supported the Covid narrative. And I ended up debating a little bit on. It ended in acrimony, but I’ve always said this since then. He’s the one person I never really wanted to end up debating because I always actually really liked Richard and admired what he did. I thought he put his points over really well. I thought he presented himself in a good way and I don’t want that. I don’t want people in the movement who are high value people going the way he did. Sort of pro-Covid restrictions, pro-Biden, etcetera. He seemed to just go complete contrarian into this mad spiral when he realised that ethno-nationalism wasn’t going to get him exactly where he wanted to overnight. And I found that disappointing.

 

And I’ve always held him in high regard for what he did when he was in the movement.

 

And I think it’s a big loss to the movement that he isn’t with us. You know, a lot of people don’t like that take. They don’t like Richard anymore. I tend to quite like him. I still view him quite fondly. I don’t think he’s gay.

 

Glen19, gave $2. Thanks:

 

“What do you think about the White nationalist rally in Detroit over the weekend? I saw it on Japanese news media over here. It looked very more multiracial. I expect, however, Jared Taylor and Delta David Duke were there. Many may hate Fuentes for being a castizo, but it looks like he’s doing well.”

 

I don’t hate Nick Fuentes and I had a big argument on my Telegram with people were very angry with me for saying what I said about him because I said it was sad that his event got cancelled. He’d sold 2,000 tickets. He had 100 strong team setting up at the venue. They cancelled it at the last minute. The venue called the police, threw them all out. Wouldn’t even let them get their stuff out. Absolute scandal!

 

And I think it’s terrible! I think it’s sad. I think it’s sad for the team. And I’ve been in that position where you’re putting on an event, people start bombarding the venue with abuse and the next thing the venue turns on you and you’ve got to pull something together because you’ve got all those people there.

 

And I’ll say this, I can understand that some people don’t like him personally. They might have a personal thing against him. They might say:

 

“He’s not my cup of tea. I don’t like him because of this. I don’t like his sort of whole Catholic thing or whatever.”

 

But I don’t understand why anyone would wish defeat upon a young man who spends the vast majority of his time talking about two things, White genocide and jewish power. He’s putting on a conference with, 20,000 people there, two of whom are Jared Taylor and David Duke. You know, when it comes down to it, I wish him all the best. You know, other people there, like Keith Woods, Jake Shields, there’s plenty of people there.

 

So I don’t really and I hope that America First go on to sue that venue to the point where the venue has to shut down and they end up owning it. That would be my ideal outcome for this. And like, I know Nick Fuentes doesn’t like me. I know that people always say:

 

“Well, he would never come out and bat for you, Mark.”

 

Well, maybe he wouldn’t. Maybe he wouldn’t. Maybe he doesn’t like me.

 

But I’m not going to say anything bad about him. And I feel for him, I feel for his team, and I hope they get justice over this scandalous abuse of power.

 

Natty: Well, I know you’re not going to say anything bad about him, but at the risk of being the bad guy here, Nick Fuentes did a deal with Ali Alexander for political power and a time when he knew that Ali Alexander was basically a paedophile and was preying on his fan base. And Nick Fuentes gave him access to this.

 

So it’s very hard for people who know about the backstory of this to support Fuentes, even though he says the right things. This is a guy who’s done very, …

 

David Clews: Did someone not do a deal with Ernst Rohm to get power?

 

Natty: Okay.

 

Mark Collett: Natty literally has been put in his place.

 

David Clews: And I see that if you are in the ruthless pursuit of power, then sometimes you perhaps have to do deals with people that you might not like or agree with. You know, is that is like, I mean, look, obviously that stuff you, I wouldn’t do it. You wouldn’t do it.

 

But, you know, do we not maybe need to be a bit more Machiavellian as Fuente is not quite Machiavellian.

 

Natty: In that way, not in my opinion. And you could do deals with unpleasant people, but brown paedophiles? No, I’m drawing a line on that one.

 

David Clews: But see, the thing about Fuentes as well, I quite like him as well. I think he’s very charismatic. But is it not that he reflects young people and young people live in a multiracial world? People were criticising him, saying, look at all the foreigners. What was he meant to do? Like, these are people he obviously does speak out about White people being in charge. He speaks about Christians being in Charlie. What is he supposed to say? Well, you’re not allowed to come along because you’re not White. What should he do in these situations?

 

Natty: No no no. I’m not saying any of that. They’re all good points. And Mark’s made good points as well.

 

And none of what you guys are saying isn’t true.

 

But this is a guy who gave Ali Alexander knowing who Ali Alexander was, access to his fan base and access to the people who followed him and looked up to him. And that for me is totally reprehensible and is like a line that just should never be crossed.

 

Mark Collett: Do you have any points to make on that, Tollah?

 

The Ayatollah: No, not really. Just sat with a popcorn.

 

Mark Collett: Okay.

 

David Clews: This is not a bit like Baron Harkonnen, like sometimes you need to offer up a young boy as a sacrifice. You know.

 

The Ayatollah: I really do.

 

Natty: David, I really hope you.

 

David Clews: I’m joking.

 

Mark Collett: This is what I like, having David Clews on. He’s the guy that you expect utter maturity and professionalism from, but he will. He never fails to shock and amaze when the time comes.

 

So yeah, thank you for everyone’s points on that. ThinRedLine gave $5. Thank you so much! Said:

 

“Democracy equals plutocracy!”

 

Thank you so much! AlbionForever gave an odysee token. Thank you so much!

 

“If you Just Stop Oil did a protest as a synagogue that have to be renamed Just Stop Moil!”

 

Thank you very much.

 

The Ayatollah: Do you hear any story? There was a story about a Moyle. There was a story about a Moyle in Crown Heights, not far from where those tunnels were discovered at the start of the year, this moil. And he’d been going to work drunk and he got the sack.

 

Natty: Do you know, before this dream started, I realised I was going to have to keep a sharp eye on your jokes because a lot of them just fly over my head, especially when you’re referencing Brittany pop.

 

But that was good. That’s a good one. We’ll take that.

 

The Ayatollah: Cheers. You’re welcome.

 

Mark Collett: Wife Waffen gave $7. Thank you so much, my dear. She said:

 

“Good morning. Hope you have a great week.”

 

Thank you very much. Katie Fanning’s Padded Cell gave $3. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“Do you think Kenny’s party and Alec’s party will form a coalition majority in the next general election? They think. So now can we get an impression from our true leader, the Ayatollah of Alec Yearbury?”

 

The Ayatollah: No, I can’t do an impression of Yearbury. I’m afraid I can’t. It always reminds me of the guy is it Paul Dempsey who used to host the boxing on what is now TNT Sport? But that’s a very obscure reference that no one’s going to get and that’s not going to be satisfactory to people but I think they’ve formed a thing there’s a new division he’s formed continuing the kind of military autism theme called and it’s got an acronym it’s tactical observation surveys and special expeditionary reconnaissance service.

 

So it’s TOSSERS. Yeah, I got that.

 

David Clews: Can I just say as well like from an outside perspective. Like I speak to a lot of people, I try and maintain good relations with as many people. I understand if you’re in the trenches there’s going to be. I find it quite disappointing that there is and I don’t like seeing the whole. There’s so much division. I just, I do think a lot of it is really down to and I was talking about this the other night I think a lot of it is down to the lack of money and this wider movement that we’re in.

 

If you look at the Labour Party so many of these people would love to probably strangle each other but at the end of the day they’re an MP, they’ve got ninety! A year in an office in London or they’re a researcher, they’ve got 30 year. I mean you imagine if we as a movement were able to pay just what I see, a wider nationalist movement. You were able to pay 50 people 25, 30 grand a year. I mean you’re not buying silence. You’re going to have people more likely to just say:

 

“Well look, we’re going to have to do this.”

 

And again, any sort of fledgling revolutionary movement from history, it’s had a lot of money whether it was on the Right, whether it was on the left. Whereas you know, now people spend their money on their holidays, they spend their money on going to the football. You know that’s why I do see this and I’m glad to see people support you, Mark, people need to support content creators. They need to because it just becomes a situation where you do like the easiest thing to do is just go and show for Israel like I could just turn my Twitter off tonight and just become Ollie of London and just start, you know, push and you get 10, 20 grand a month. You know, doing what we do is so hard.

 

And I think there’s a lot of energy and frustration and again, fundamentally, intellects, which is one of the problems, I think, on this wider movement, which does have a lot of different aspects of it, and it is hard to keep it united because you have a lot of very intelligent people.

 

Mark Collett: Look, I say this.

 

One of the things I do find tiring is this constant nonsense where people say:

 

“Oh, it’s the grift, mate, it’s the grift. People do it for an easy life.”

 

Well, you can total up the donations I made on the stream tonight so far, and it’s under $200. You know, that’s not if it was ten times that, I could understand people saying:

 

“Oh, the grift, it’s an easy life!”

 

Look, but it’s not an easy life. And outside of really those huge American shows where the big American donors are chucking in huge, huge sort of silly kind of money, there isn’t vast sums of money in this. And I don’t know anyone that’s really come out of ethno-nationalism as a millionaire. It just doesn’t happen. To suggest that people have put their lives, families, etc., at risk. They, you know, some people have been jailed, they’ve lost their bank accounts and then people are whining because there’s a couple of Superchats over a two hour stream. It’s pathetic, to be honest!

 

The Ayatollah: Same people will pay for Netflix and whatever else in a lot of cases as well. Not all of them, but a lot of them. I mean, we used to get called grifters on the Tasob podcast when we didn’t even take donations. So frankly, people talk out their asses.

 

Natty: Well, the, I mean, you’ve, Mark, you’ve kind of answered your own question, or you’ve answered David’s question there. The reason we’re ideologues, we have an ideology, that’s why we can’t get on with each other. And because we’re rigid and hard line and there’s no money in it. There’s grifters could get on with each other. If you’re making a hell of a lot of money, you’d be willing to compromise and do things with other grifters of a different stripe. But no, we’re not in that channel.

 

David Clews: That’s an excellent point, Natty, because in my shows, I show the sort of nexus, the way they’re all linked, like Russell Brands, all LinkedIn, Joe Rogan, they all, Trigernometry, they all go on each other’s shows. They all benefit each other. And they will never actually have an honest conversation about race. They would never have an honest conversation about the role of jewish power in the world.

 

And again, I don’t necessarily see my points out of anything ideological. These are just real. It’s like saying:

 

“This is a bottle of water. And then well, actually, it’s not. It’s a plastic.”

 

You know, these people are doing everything they possibly can to evade talking about what is really going on. It’s so annoying because when you actually talk about what is really going on, people want to go and listen to, like, Russell Brand or they want to go and listen to Alex Jones. It lulls them into this sense of security that. All right. Okay. That’s easier for me to understand what’s going. Look, here is the problem. This is why. This is the history. They don’t want to know about it.

 

Mark Collett: Right.

 

Next Superchat, Katie Fanning’s Padded Cell gave another $3. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Also.”

 

Natty: That’s your takes.

 

Mark Collett: Also, could Tollah do the dead man shoes scene, but instead have Marcus Richard and Tommy Robinson as the other guy? That would be class.

 

The Ayatollah: I can try. So what was it? Marcus Richard. Right. Okay. I’ll have a go. Bear with me a second.

 

Mark Collett: I love this scene.

 

Natty: Is this the scene where he gets out the car?

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, that’s the one.

 

David Clews: Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: Yeah.

 

The Ayatollah: If you’ll bear with me a second while I find me text so, I can’t remember it off the top me head. I’m liable to.

 

Mark Collett: I really like the film Dead Man’s Shoes. And the film-maker, he really did. He really did sort of sum up these sort of like sink that.

 

The Ayatollah: The sink.

 

Mark Collett: Estate. Life in these bad areas and how people live. I thought it was really well made.

 

Natty: Yeah.

 

The Ayatollah: Small.

 

Natty: Small town thugs. Yeah.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah.

 

Mark Collett: The fact they’re all driving around in that crap old car, you know.

 

The Ayatollah: Well, I’ll give it a go. Yeah. Okay. So I’ll check. I’ll change the names accordingly if I remember to as well. Right:

 

“Well, mate, how you doing, Mark? You okay? Yeah. You know, the lads of this ridiculous idea that. Yeah, it was me. I was for. So we up to mooching about. Mooching about in my house? Yeah. Jaws pipe. Men like women. What are you doing, lad? That’s my concern. Not when you’re in my house. Where are you staying? Motson’s farm. You’re gonna come and see me, are you? Maybe I will. Not Friday me? Are you just all chinning? Hang on. He’s weighing it up. He’s weighing it up. Shut up! Making me very nervous, Mark. Well, you should be. If I were you, I’d get in that fucking car and I get out of here, man. And I gather them goonies and get whatever you’ve got and come at me. Cause believe me, I’m gonna fucking hit you all. I don’t like being threatened, Mark. Not threatening you, mate. It’s beyond fucking words! Watched over you when you were asleep and I looked at your fucking neck and I was that far away from slicing it. You’re fucking there, mate. So get in that car and fuck off! You get to me first. I just might.”

 

Oh, yeah. That’s it!

 

Doesn’t really work.

 

Mark Collett: I like the way you added the sniffs for Tommy.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, I had to ad lib the odd bit of it as well.

 

But, yeah, it doesn’t quite carry over because you can’t really imagine Tommy Robinson speaking in a hushed voice, can you?

 

Mark Collett: You can’t. Gus in Lanzarote gave $5. Gus, I have posted your items. And he said:

 

“The Reform candidate resigned just for saying vote. Resigned just for saying vote BNP in 2010. Even Sivnat Sargon stood up to the liberal media bullies about online comments because boomers have had lives of security. Does this give a dread of being an outsider? Pariah. Pariah. >Hence they cuck.”

 

Yeah. What do you guys think about this? One of these Reform candidates has actually resigned and walked away. And he’s been hounded out just for saying that people should vote BNP 14 years ago.

 

Natty: At some point they’re going to run out. They’re going to run out of clean cut candidates and everyone’s going to have said something like:

 

“Yeah, maybe we shouldn’t have fought the Nazis, or, yeah, maybe the BNP were right about immigration.”

 

Or whatever.

 

So, yeah, there’s a limit. How many people Hope Not Hate can highlight for them to kick out. And some people are going to fold. People have their own considerations. But at some point that does start losing power and doxing starts losing power and all this kind of opposite research starts losing power. It is powerful, don’t get me wrong. And people, like I said, people are going to walk away, but at some point, that just doesn’t hold sway anymore.

 

The Ayatollah: Well, Reformed a good term for this in their statement, didn’t they? Sorry, just a quick point. They termed it in their statement after what Ian Gribbon, who, by the way, incidentally, half jewish, their candidate for Backs Hill and Battle, who said the things about we should have stayed neutral with regard to Germany in the forties, thirties and forties. They had a good term for it. They called it “offence archaeology”. And I mean, actually that their statement, and anyone can go and find it, they basically said:

 

“Look, he’s saying something that people thought was true at the time and it probably is true, we’re not endorsing it, but it is true.”

 

So it was an amazing statement. They put out, like, a lot of us would have been proud of that statement. They played that one quite well and I was surprised they would say something so basically heretical to say, we shouldn’t have fought them, we should have stayed out of that wall and objectively we would have been better off doing that.

 

But yeah, there we are.

 

David Clews: I think anything that’s done to shrink the Overton Window is bad. Thing is, if you’re going to cut to Hope Not Hate, if you’re going to allow Nick Molé’s to decide, are you honestly going to come in and you’re going to take down the international power structure? It just shows you how weak they are.

 

And I actually had a bit of a not falling out. I got annoyed the other week at Galloway’s party. They kicked a guy out because apparently he made Islamophobic comments and I actually got in touch. I said:

 

“Look, this guy’s clearly done nothing wrong here. Why are you playing that game?”

 

It’s just, it has to be. If people have said things that Hope Not Hate, find offensive, no one should ever buckle to these people on anything. Obviously, if it’s something that is beyond the pale, like say an Ali Alexander situation or something like that, or the conduct of a candidate, that’s very different. But on free speech, people expressing an opinion on the Second World War on anything, you have to stick by your candidates and your people and not throw them under a bus.

 

Mark Collett: Thank you so much! Snake, Using a Real Snake, gave $5.

 

Thank you very much. And said:

 

“I feel a system have wheeled out Farage to take the energy from those who voted for the Tories. In 2019, Labour will take a big win as a licenced to make huge unannounced, pre-planned seismic changes to society via the 1997 CP to Hitchens.”

 

I think we’ve all said that actually, is that. I mean thank you for the Superchat, but I do believe that is literally the point we’ve all made tonight. Would you all agree?

 

Natty: Yeah, Tony Blair didn’t stand on mass immigration, but that’s what we got.

 

So you’re going to get the same thing here.

 

Mark Collett: A Snake, Using a Real Snake gave another $10. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Keir Starmer is largely funded by a Trevor Chin, president of Israel based UJIA [United Jewish Israel Appeal], and he’s also on the executive board of Viacom, the largest Israel lobby group in the UK. Viacom is headed by a Richard Peter. Who was formerly employed by the Israeli prime minister’s office. And it is still an IDF reserve.”

 

I didn’t know any of that. Did any of you guys know that? I’m actually going to make a note of that.

 

David Clews: Yeah. Yeah. One of Starmer’s other biggest funders, a guy called Gary Lubner and whose son is now head of Labour Youth, Gary Lubner was brought up in South Africa. Auto glass. Ran the auto glass chair. Ultra, ultra Zionist. I think he gave. Let me actually tell you how much Jack Lubner. Sorry, Gary Lubner gave to Labour. Gary Lubner Labour. He gave 13 million quid to the Labour Party. A guy called Gary Lubner. So like, Starmer’s Left-wing Zionist control, Keir Starmer and that they bankrolled him. Huge sums of money. 13 million this guy’s given to Starmer.

 

Mark Collett: Well, I’ve just Googled that Viacom, you know, British Israel communications and research centre. And yeah, if that is all true and he’s being funded by them, I mean he tells you everything you need to know, really. Ants Alligate $5. Thank you so much! And said:

 

“Happy that four of my favourite lads are together on PWR tonight. Loving David Clews, Unity News channel. I rely on him for the real news now. He has a unique presentation style that I really enjoy. Big hit with the ladies.”

 

David Clews: David, how do you feel to be expected? Happens to me if I can get home without being accosted by gangs of gorgeous 20 something women. It’s a good day.

 

Mark Collett: Very good. Jay Bradley gave $5. Thank you so much! And he said:

 

“Communism, capitalism are two sides of the same coin. Both are jewish. They’re in too deep. No voting our way out of this one.”

 

Well, thank you very much. The David Clews fan there. AlbionForever. I know we would have done that one. Scaredycat. $4. Thank you so much!:

 

“Hi, David. Ayatollah Natty and Mark, is it possible to introduce Sheikh Imran Hussein to Mark? I think your newspaper interviewed him. Right now he’s in Malaysia, then Indonesia onto Armenia and then Russia, eventually to stop over in England on his way home. To Trinidad, the Caribbean island. He organised emigration.”

 

But if there’s people that are interesting, I will talk to them. I get into trouble for doing this. I did the Dilly Hussein interview. People were very angry about that. At one point, I spoke to those black lads down in London. I really enjoyed the trip down there for the day. That was interesting. And I’ve said to other people that I would be more than happy to have Muslims on here.

 

In fact, I actually did an interview with a member of the Syrian government during the war in Syria when that was on. And that was an interesting. That was an interesting chat. And he was literally saying:

 

“Look, you know, we don’t want our people going over to the UK. We’re against you guys disappearing, you know.”

 

Very interesting.

 

So, yeah, I’d be open to that. Does anyone want to add anything to this?

 

David Clews: No. No, I don’t know. Who is he? Who is he?

 

Mark Collett: I have to Google him.

 

David Clews: Just on. Without mentioning the name, there’s actually some news that’s come out tonight that the leader of Hezbollah, Hassan Nasrallah, has said that Cyprus is being used by the Israeli air force to launch attacks on Lebanon because geographically, Cyprus there. So he said:

 

“If a war takes place, then Cyprus would be within their crosshairs.”

 

Now, who, which country has a lot of Air Force bases on Cyprus? We do! These air forces are clearly being used.

 

So, yeah, have a look at the that stuff. He’s made a speech that’s being regarded as quite incendiary, that if, because it looks like Israel are going to launch. They’ve got bored of Gaza, they’re going to launch a ground operation in southern Lebanon.

 

And again, these Hezbollah aren’t Hamas. They’ve got, he says, 100,000 people. They’ve got some serious weapons and that if you want a pretext to war with Iran, well, we’ve got British interests on Cyprus. They’ve got missiles that can hit us.

 

Mark Collett: You know, look, I’ll tell you this as well, and I know it’s running over slightly, so we’ve got a couple more Superchats.

 

But one thing that has, or should be shocking the current world order is the way that these very expensive, very complex, state of the art tanks are getting completely wrecked both in the open battlefields of the Ukraine and in the cramped ruins of Gaza city. I have seen videos of Israeli tanks being, you know, dozens of them being destroyed by guys who have got state of the art, shoulder mounted, armour piercing rocket launchers. And you’re seeing a crew being completely, you know, turned to jam on the inside. And a piece of equipment that’s probably worth, I don’t know, a couple of million for a tank. Is a tank a couple of million?

 

Natty: Probably much, much more than a couple of million.

 

Mark Collett: Well, okay, well, let’s say it’s 10 million. How much is it to train the troops in there? How easy is to replace that once they’ve been trained? War is changing. And I would say this, the fact, and this is really for a different show, but the fact that the war cabinet in Israel is breaking down, I think it’s in no small part to the fact that they’ve rolled into Gaza and it hasn’t been the pushover they thought it was going to be. I think they’ve got spanked.

 

And the problem is, today you’ve got two types of war. You either obliterate from the air, and I mean obliterate to the point where literally nothing’s left. You know, there’s not a rat, there’s not a cockroach, nothing. Or you have a meat grinder. It’s either obliterate or your own troops are getting chewed up. It’s as simple as that.

 

David Clews: Well, that’s what Putin could have done that to Ukraine.

 

The Ayatollah: Or it’s Ukraine now.

 

David Clews: Yeah, that’s right. I mean, Putin could have flattened, they could flatten Kiev, they could flatten all these cities in Ukraine.

 

But again, not simping for Putin, but he clearly doesn’t do that.

 

And as you’re right, Mark, it’s either you just carpet bomb the place or you have a meat grinder. And that’s what it is.

 

And I think it’s just these people go on about how civilised they are. I think it’s a terrible situation that we are, 2024, and they’re leading us towards this war.

 

And I think I’ve met a lot of you guys. They talk about blood thirst and bloodlust. You know, I’ve never met anyone that says:

 

“Yet, war is a great thing. We need to do it!”

 

It’s crazy, crazy times.

 

Mark Collett: Right? AlbionForever said:

 

“Nativist bars.”

 

Thank you so much! Anti Mattoid gave $59.12.

 

Thank you so much for such a generous donation. And he said:

 

“Great show!”

 

Well, I’m pleased you enjoyed it so much, my friend. ScaredyCat gave $4.

 

Thank you very much. And said:

 

“Hi again, Mark, David, Ayatollah, Natty, Sheikh Imran Hussein. Samir was born in London but emigrated to Morocco and openly invites Muslims in the West on YouTube to settle back in Morocco, where he will help them establish themselves in their new country. Sheikh in previous years did this in Pakistan.”

 

Well, look, if you’ve got a Muslim scholar that wants to speak to me and you can put this guy in touch with me, and he is somebody who has the same opinion on us that we don’t want war between Christians and Muslims, but we do want a peaceful separation. You know, I don’t want a war, but I don’t want multiculturalism either. I don’t want a war because I want peaceful separation. And if there are Muslims or blacks or from any other racial group that have the same ethno-nationalist leanings as us and want a peaceful separation and a re-migration of people in the West to elsewhere in the world, I would absolutely hold out a hand of friendship and, yeah, that would be great! And I’m sure David would interview someone like as well, because David interviews anyone, usually with hilarious consequences.

 

David Clews: Anyway, you should be open.

 

The Ayatollah: Malaysia, then Indonesia, Armenia, Russia. Sorry. Go on, mate. Go on.

 

David Clews: You know, I think everyone should be open minded too. I think if there is a threat of a war, like, because clearly if there’s a war, it doesn’t matter if you’re a ethno-nationalists, civic nationalists or whatever, like, it’s not going to end well.

 

So I think if they do keep ramping this war rate to the cup, I think speaking with as many people as possible is healthy and to try and stop this.

 

Mark Collett: I agree. And the interesting thing with ethno-nationalism, real ethno-nationalism, you see, one last thing I’ll say to sum up on this issue, and everyone can have the same, we’ll close it down. We’re not going over by a massive amount of time. But genuinely, when I see the Tommy lads and like I said this about Anne Marie Waters a long time ago when she was talking about the need to invade Iran, the real hatred actually comes from these sort of civn ats who are playing the system’s game because they see Muslims.

 

And their natural response to the conflict between Whites and Muslims in this country is to level every single Muslim country in the Middle East, slaughter as many as possible, and they’re all cheering for that. I absolutely don’t want that! I understand that this conflict is created by the globalists in order to fracture, atomize and create a state where you will not have a homogeneous force that can overthrow the globalists.

 

Henceforth, we need peaceful separatism.

 

And one thing that we absolutely don’t want is more war, because more war creates refugees who end up coming. Coming here to the West, that is a succinct worldview. The worldview of, say, like the Tommy people or the Anne Marie Waters’ people when they’ve both, respectively pushed this line is one that ultimately leads to more problems and ironically, to more Muslim immigration.

 

So I would absolutely speak to these people.

 

Anyway, it’s been a wonderful show tonight.

 

I’d like to thank all these great guests, Natty, Tollah and David, if you’d all like to say you goodbyes, shill your own work. And then me and Natty have got our little gay announcement to come at the end and then we’ll shut things down.

 

Natty: Well, I’ll save my goodbyes until you make your announcement, but thanks, everyone. It’s been a pleasure.

 

The Ayatollah: Yeah, okay, I’ll be in forever.

 

Basically was being cheap. He was requesting for me to wrap when he did Nativist bars. So I’ll oblige him as quickly as I can with some that’s been sanitized.

 

So this is in character as Nativist is concerned:

 

“Been the scourge of the noses since I co-founded TASOB making more black sons and De Niro and Azov ZOG sweating buckets because I’m sticking the boot in. And I got more lines in the civn at from Luton. Catch me every month on the PA film review. World’s greatest movie critic for naming the jew. And I’m teaching young nationalists about strategy and planning a set of made up trials. Like Katie Fanning still telling all the birds about the Nat Soc solution. And I’m picking up more tens and Pearl Jams distribution. We’re going to save the White race and I’m the best of those trying. Best chapters lie ahead in the life of Ryan.”

 

That’s me done. Thanks for having me. Good night.

 

Mark Collett: Thank you, mate. David, shill your work and then me.

 

David Clews: And very, very impressive. Can I just say what absolutely fantastic show. Pleasure to be here with Tollah and Natty and yourself, Mark. Really interesting, deep, thorough conversation and it’s always good to be around people that have such a good knowledge and including the audience as well, that have a knowledge of what is going on. Like obviously some people will have different conclusions, they will interpret things differently.

 

But the thing that really pisses me off the most is so much of the Right, even the Left or whatever. It’s so superficial. There is no in depth analysis done on anything and it’s terrible! You need people more researched. You need people understanding. You need a penetrative analysis.

 

And that’s why I think conversations like this are so good! So thanks to everyone, and thanks very much for your audience for the warm welcome as well.

 

Mark Collett: Okay, we’ve got one little final announcement. Tonight, Natty, being a kind and loving brotherly friend, was good enough to gift me Helldivers 2, at the weekend on steam. So me and him are doing a special brotherly stream on Sunday night, killing bugs as space marines. What do you have to say about this, Natty?

 

Natty: It’s going to be absolutely epic. I’m going to drag you, drag you into the modern age of gaming. No more side scrolling, platforming, eight bitness crappy, crappy games we’re playing. Hell, we’re dropping onto hostile planets and we’re going to be dropping napalm on bugs, flaming them out, rocket launchers, the whole shebang. So look forward to that one.

 

Mark Collett: Look forward to that. Sunday night, 07:00 pm well, look, I just want to thank everyone again. Thank you to Natty, Tollah, and David. Support these guys. I genuinely love all these fellows, and when I got a chance to stream with them all tonight, I was over the moon. I hope you’ve enjoyed it as much as I have. It’s been a very fast moving and informative show. We don’t often do panels like this, but please support all these guys because they all do so much for this cause.

 

And all of them are people that actually want to work together towards some kind of unity to do something positive. You know, these aren’t the back biting people. These aren’t the people in the dark depths of Telegram stirring things up. They’re all powerful content creators working together in the real world for change. Support these guys. I love them all. Thank you so much! Thank you to everyone, Natty, Tollah, David, thank you to all those who generously donated. I couldn’t do this without your continued support. You know, if I didn’t get donations, if I didn’t get people Superchats, I wouldn’t be able to afford to do this. It’s as simple as that.

 

So thank you for keeping this show going for as long as it’s been going. 267 episodes plus 100 episodes of Tutar before it. And thank you most of all to everyone who tunes in on a weekly basis. I’ll see you all again next week, hopefully see you on Sunday when I’ll be playing with Natty. Until then, stay strong. Keep fighting. Good night.

 

The Ayatollah: I love you all.

 

Mark Collett: See you all soon. Thank you. Bye.

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/23/2024 = 916)

Mark Collett
3 days ago
Pinned by @MarkCollett
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

2
4
Hide replies

@Trevor
3 days ago
Labour will be in deep shit within 6 months to a year. If they dare put taxes up ever so slightly the Tory media will lambast them deliberately forgetting that their party are the ones who gave us the highest ever tax burden
The Tory Right are becoming unhinged in terms of who they want to throw under the bus: the sick, the disabled, the unemployed – and for many of the younger Tories, the elderly
I don’t think Labour will be overtly anti-white but they are very likely to crack down on dissidents. I think the panel are right that war is coming and it’s going to be disastrous for a society as atomised, as selfish and as ethnically divided as this one is. We are also grossly over-dependent on food imports

2
0

@Trevor
3 days ago(edited)
Having gone to a private school myself I am completely ambivalent about them paying VAT on the fees. This society is dominated by the privately educated, it’s they who are running it off a cliff and having been educated at such a place, I can tell you that from day one you are encouraged to view the rest of society as being beneath you
David Clews is a bit contradictory on that – he’s talking about the politics of envy on private school fees yet knocking “boomers” for benefitting from higher interest rates. I guarantee bashing boomers will backfire on people – that generation’s property is being eyed up by the asset management firms and it won’t be passed onto their kids.

1
0
Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Be patient with those in our movement. We may not agree on everything but thats ok

7
0
Fancy
3 days ago
THEY need people to sign up willingly. The only way to do that is a false flag so we all think we are the good guys fighting terror. remind you of anything ?

4
0

@What3
3 days ago
best stream ever. high level political analysis, i agree with the clews fella on sunak, sunak is throwing it. zog is getting all their ducks in a row for war with iran/russia and their proxies

3
1
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
the west is not in anyway ready to fight a war against anyone

1
1
danzimmons
3 days ago
Dave & Tollah both are hilarious

2
0

@ИванКожедуб
2 days ago(edited)
All Star Panel! Great show.
Disabling splats was gay though.

@MarkCollett
, or anyone: can you link the photo of Farage with his arm round Thomas-Bowen? I can’t find it, or any reference to it.

1
0

@xero
3 days ago
1:42:59
top notch lmao

1
0
Henry
3 days ago
What is the point of the Lib Dems? I don’t get it.

0
1
Henry
3 days ago
Likud (The House) always wins!

1
0

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN-UP to the PA Newsletter (scroll down):
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/get_involved

0
1
Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Beau and Dan got chipped from Reform… and they’re with The lotus eaters

1
0

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
Good evening everyone.

0
1

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
I’m quite bored by the general election, but this show was actually really interesting. Great stream, great guests.

1
0

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
bugs and terminators.

0
1

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
JOIN the Patriotic Alternative gaming group on Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticGamers

0
1

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

0
1
danzimmons
3 days ago
nothing better than spending the evening on Tgram watching dirt poor sandal clad orphaned Palestinian kid’s yeeting IDF hiding in their billions of dollars armor tanks

1
0
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I called it from the start, Israel will defacto loose this war

2
1

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
Mark Collett on Britain going to war with Germany:

1
0

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Patriotic Alternative official links:
PATV:

Patriotic Alternative Video

Website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk
Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticAlternativeOfficial
Membership:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/join

0
2

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN the petition to FREE SAM MELIA!
https://www.change.org/FreeSamMelia

0
2

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
FREE Mark Collett eBook | The Fall of Western Man:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

0
2

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Mark Collett:
Telegram:
https://t.me/markacollett
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/c/MarkCollett
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/MarkCollett
BitChute:
https://tinyurl.com/ynec2sys
Gab:
https://gab.com/markcollett

0
2
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
^^

0
2

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow SerenaJB:
X:
Tweets by SerenaJB3
Gab:
https://gab.com/SerenaJB

0
2
Chief Moody
3 days ago
I’ll be streaming tomorrow, guys

1
1
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
David Clews has been a great addition I hope he returns

1
1
ScaredyCat
3 days ago
$4.00
HiAgain, Mark,David,Ayatollah & Natty: Sheikh Imran Hosein’s student “Sameer” was born in London, but emigrated 2 Morocco & openly invites Muslims in West on YouTube 2 settle in Morocco, where he will help them establish themselves in their “new” country. Sheikh inPreviousYears did this in Pakistan.

0
2
danzimmons
3 days ago
Nick was great on Periscope, every since getting his first $500K Bitcoin he’s been doing nothing but cucking

1
3
Hide replies
GusinLanzarote Alt Right
1 day ago
I cant understand those who Cuck once they have enough Surely the best thing about having the £$ should be not having to worry about being sacked/ cancelled- Farage is the same

Honkey
3 days ago
hopefully AF wins huge damages $$$$

1
1
Henry
2 days ago
This guy is spreading lies about nick fuentes and ali alexander. You should ban Natty.

2
5
Hide replies
Natty
2 days ago
How is it a lie? Ali Alexander was messaging a 15yr old boy who was part of AF

5
0

@JohnConnor
2 days ago
Are you non White? If the answer is no, get your head out of your behind about spic Fuentes

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Good night Brothers and Sisters

0
2

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Chief Moody:
Odysee:

@Chief_Moody
Telegram:
https://t.me/chiefmoody
Gab:
https://gab.com/Chief_Moody
YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@ChiefMoody

1
2

@Glen19
3 days ago
$2.00
What did you think about the White Nationalist rally in Detroit over the weekend? I saw it on Japanese news media over here. It looked more multiracial than I would expect. However, Jared Taylor & Dr. David Duke was there. Many may hate Fuentes for being a Castizo but looks like he is doing well.

2
5
Hide replies
Henry
3 days ago
This comment was slimed to death. (Click to view)

0
5
ScaredyCat
3 days ago
$4.00
Hi, David,Ayatollah,Natty & Mark: Is itPossible 2 introduce Sheikh Imran Hosein 2 Mark ? I think YourNewspaper interviewed him. RightNow he is inMalaysia, then Indonesia, onto Armenia & Russia, eventually 2 stopover in England on his way home in Trinidad, the Caribbean island. .HeOrganizedEmigration

1
3
Dawn Browning
1 day ago
Phew. Thankfully Mr Clews didn’t have a Freudian moment @
1:24:00
when he said “these stupid stunts” in reference to disruptive attention seeking actions by the likes of Stop Oil

GusinLanzarote Alt Right
1 day ago
Didnt know about the Nonce aspect to Ali Alexander I remember Alex Jones fawning to him because he is Non White Once again Alex picks a winner! Not the greatest judge of strategy or men If he led an Army regiment back in ye Olden days he’d do a Custer & get himself + everyone else wiped out Best not invite him on PWR or the show will be shut down the next day!

Stolen Content
2 days ago
1:16:00
the «rant» may be close to over and I am unaware who the gentleman bottom rigth is, but Mark: you should jews his words.
There is no white and black pill that is coming your way with Farrage..
He is granted his words to prove to the fence-sitting elite that you common people now like 80 years ago felt the same, thus justifying your complete and final remowal

Hide replies
Natty
2 days ago
Interesting take

@filled_soda
2 days ago
Great stream!

@Spectromancer
3 days ago
I appreciate Mark’s succinct comment about WWII being about maintaining the current bankers monopoly on currency. This needs to be repeated until everyone understands.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
the power of one! the power of two! the power of maany

withey
3 days ago
goodnight all

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Great stream 1488 o/

Honkey
3 days ago
great show o/

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
o/ tollah

The Ayatollah
3 days ago

@why
Odysee and Rumble:

@TheAyatollah
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision

Honkey
3 days ago
good to see Clews on the show

@EnglishRose
3 days ago
Thank you, great stream.

danzimmons
3 days ago

@why
3 days ago
I bet spencer had a go on it

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@danzimmons
LMAO

@why
3 days ago
And you have something against the number 3???

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
she has already been on maybe twice

danzimmons
3 days ago
Natty

Natty
3 days ago

@danzimmons
absolute kek

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
yes remigration

@why
3 days ago
Have Syrian Girl on, just so we can simp…

@why
3 days ago
Gen Z aint fighting, theyre more radical than we are

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 days ago
<0.01
based dungarees please Tollah

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Thanks folks. Till next time.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Great show

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Hahahaha the Katie Fanning line

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
Good night good folks. Thanks everyone for attending the stream.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
yes agreed

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
lmao

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@why
Follow The Ayatollah:
Main Telegram:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah
Off-Topic Telegram:
https://t.me/TollahOffTopic
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision
Odysee:

@TheAyatollah

@Joesmith
3 days ago
lol

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
lol

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
Great show tonight.

@why
3 days ago
where is tollah streaming now?

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
That didn’t sound good lol.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Gay announcement ?

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 days ago

@Natty
evening mate

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
amen

@Joesmith
3 days ago
14

@BlackPigeonPilled
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
we’re the most desirable in the world

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow David Clews:
X:
https://x.com/unitynewsnet
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/UnityNews
Website:

home

Telegram:
https://t.me/UnityNewsNetwork
Rumble:
https://tinyurl.com/ms7mnm7d
Facebook:
https://tinyurl.com/mr4ym3f8

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
militarily speaking russia cannot keep it up for more than 2 years from now. they don’t have the demographics for it, they are imploding. 2nd they need to plug 3 more sensitive areas if they are to feel safe as they were in 1952. plus china already took territory from them in the east.

@why
3 days ago
lol

@why
3 days ago
they lost a sperg who cucked

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
have

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
they should

@why
3 days ago
gay

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
bravo

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
‘The drip’s the best part!’

@why
3 days ago
needed the minecraft music

Natty
3 days ago
fanatastic

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
3 days ago
bravo

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
What did they expect? The Palestinians are fighting off extinction.

@cheflad
3 days ago
if you listen to Scott Ritter ,the IDF are taking a beating and are totally demoralised

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Ayatollah:
Main Telegram:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah
Off-Topic Telegram:
https://t.me/TollahOffTopic
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision
Odysee:

@TheAyatollah

Honkey
3 days ago
Cyprus didnt learn its lesson in the Kitos War

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Kinda would like some more attention on American topics also

@why
3 days ago
get george galloway on

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Mark Collett | Interview on Blood Brothers Podcast:

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ScaredyCat
Thanks again for donating.

@why
3 days ago
these are the best interviews mark

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
David the Chad

Honkey
3 days ago
nice dono o/

@AntiMattoid

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
lol

@why
3 days ago
j’s would never cuck, they would just say he was having a bad day because of holohoax anxiety

@Diogenes
3 days ago
y

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
agreed

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AntiMattoid
Thanks for your generous donation!

Anti Mattoid
3 days ago
$59.12
Great show.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Join us at Patriotic Alternative:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/get_involved

@cheflad
3 days ago
ar least we’re not Speaking German

@why
3 days ago
you just need to make it as an MP once and youve made it

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Hahaha

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Katie taking a doing

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
LMAO

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Charles
It’s not looking good.

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
I’m going to have to watch it again.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
The sniffing hahaha

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
<0.01
Nativist Bars

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
PA FILM REVIEW – Dead Man’s Shoes:
https://tinyurl.com/3wyw42md

@Joesmith
3 days ago
i use to hang around mannor house because of some lass

@why
3 days ago
bullying each other

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
Perhaps they are a lost cause and are destined to be useful morons?

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
An autistic 14 year old got nicked a few weeks ago for just possessing those documents, Charlie got extradited from Spain, but this particular guy, nothing. Nothing to see here…

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
LMAO again.

@why
3 days ago
best name on the internet

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Charles
Drinking overpriced food and beer. Plus murderous fees for parking.

@why
3 days ago
embrace the sperg

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
I got free tickets to a NFL game and the amount of normies screaming their idiotic heads off is astounding

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
I never knew him, but that’s irrelevant. As soon as I saw he has not been arrested for doing something that autistic teenagers get nicked for, I knew he was a state asset.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
so true

@why
3 days ago
and we’re all spergs lol

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
I never liked that particular lad. There was always something not right about him.

Chief Moody
3 days ago
Egotism is partly the problem with Nationalism

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
possibly. but the state doesn’t give out free passes on terror offences in exchange for nothing…

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
I’d say that sounds like strategic by the state.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
yes pay your tidings

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
When I became aware of that, I knew they were a fed op without a shadow of a doubt.

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
Indeed.

danzimmons
3 days ago
#David Clews is NOT gay. x10

@cheflad
3 days ago
i get it ,Paul Dempsey is a top footy commentator as well.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
good name

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ScaredyCat
Thanks for your consistent and loyal support.

@hunter
3 days ago
miss tasob

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
Quid pro quo perhaps.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
cancel netflix pay your tidings

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
The country is burning but hey…is the football game on?

@cheflad
3 days ago
go and ask Sam & Laura if its an easy life.

@CrankyCracker2
3 days ago
mexican catboy made his million

@why
3 days ago
Ralph did ok for a while, the gunt.. cant abort the retort

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Fed, gay, jew, or grifter. The classic divisive accusations.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
it is a meager existance

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Isn’t it interesting how Homeland’s second in command got let off sharing the same links as Charlie Big Potatoes?

@why
3 days ago
Clews News…

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I like David Clews

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
FREE Mark Collett eBook | The Fall of Western Man:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
I had to spell it “moil” because Mark would pronounce mohel “mo-hel”

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
LMAO

danzimmons
3 days ago
think about the children just stop moils

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@14Reasons
that is kind of a joke, he meant you shouldn’t let your desires/vices govern you

@why
3 days ago
catboys not gay

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
HAHAHAHA

@why
3 days ago

@Charles
bruh

danzimmons
3 days ago
lol

@why
3 days ago
when even gaped alaska ended up as an informant

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Natty is right

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
PA FILM REVIEW – Dune Part 2:

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Dont think there’s any evidence Nick is gay

@MrRoboto
3 days ago
lol

@why
3 days ago
he also recieved about 1m quid in BTC a few days before jan 6th

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Chief Moody:
Odysee:

@Chief_Moody
Telegram:
https://t.me/chiefmoody
Gab:
https://gab.com/Chief_Moody
YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@ChiefMoody

@hunter
3 days ago
is that true?

@alpha007org
3 days ago
Was that 100% confirmed. Because I heard a slightly different story… But I don’t know

14Reasons
3 days ago
“having sex with women is gay”

@why
3 days ago
nice was there in jan 6th as well and got away scot free

Chief Moody
3 days ago
Fuentes said that women were pedophiles

14Reasons
3 days ago
fuentes is a homosexual. is he not?

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Be good if Nick matured a bit more

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Unfortunately Fuentes rubs a lot of people the wrong way.

@Glen19
3 days ago
we can treat them all universally with contempt

@Glen19
3 days ago
I don’t care if a pedo is brown or not. lol

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I like him

@Diogenes
3 days ago
I like Nick but the virgin queen Chihuahua is a hilarious nickname

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Spencer is camp as a row of tents

danzimmons
3 days ago
Fuentes is gud at getting free publicity, and that’s it

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Keith Woods was there too

@DissidentZelda
3 days ago
Thank you.

@CrankyCracker2
3 days ago
exactly

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Gay pedo rates are insane and yet no one in the mainstream even dares speak of the reality

@why
3 days ago
laura loomer also

danzimmons
3 days ago
is it true that a chic got hi on shrooms & stooped Dr. Duke

The Crucible 01
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
the event was cancelled Thursday and nick didnt say anything until Saturday

@Glen19
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Gays adopt kids so they can abuse them

@why
3 days ago
greg and his “merry men”

@Diogenes
3 days ago
if you say down with Israel no venue in Western World

The Crucible 01
3 days ago
nick fuentes is an obvious grifter

@MarkCollett

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Honkey
I think they will

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@why
Grindr is full of pedos and big surprise…a Israeli Jay created the app

@why
3 days ago
his russia missus has a proper pair of norks

@alpha007org
3 days ago
I heard months/weeks before Trump got elected, there were promises of gov. jobs. But then 180 turn. And Richy got mad. that’s all.

@BillBikes
3 days ago
Gaayyyyyyy!

Honkey
3 days ago
AF isnt “white nationalist”

danzimmons
3 days ago
Ninart Spencer was always a clout chasing fa@@et

@why
3 days ago
RS deffo not gay

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Donate via the PA website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/donations

Natty
3 days ago
yeah guys i know he’s probably not actually gay, but chasing novelty takes for rage bait is pretty gay

Honkey
3 days ago
supporting Biden is just absurd

@Glen19
3 days ago
I hated the COVID nonsense that went on. There is no mass death coming.

@SomaComa
3 days ago
we should try and stand together

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
That speech he gave at Auburn university in 2017 was brilliant too. Shame what happened to him.

@why
3 days ago
grindr greg

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Diogenes
yes

Stan1
3 days ago
thought you were talking about Frank doh

@Diogenes
3 days ago
ask Faith Goldy

@Glen19
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Both are gay?

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@AwarenessOfBeing
Excellent spot on example. Thanks

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
TO be fair, those old NPI propaganda videos were brilliant.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

@why
3 days ago
he’s shagged everything

Honkey
3 days ago
haha

@why
3 days ago
nah hes not

@why
3 days ago
lol

Merry_Englander
3 days ago

@Charles
That’s pretty much what happened with Liberia.

danzimmons
3 days ago
lol kuer starmer the hotdog stormer

@why
3 days ago
He’s probably mi5

@why
3 days ago
he spent 5 years in northern ireland working for the police

@Glen19
3 days ago
They slow it down because of the pushback but then they ramp it up

@hunter
3 days ago
Labour will introduce a race equality act which will sail through parliament with labours huge majority

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Glen19
mhm

@Glen19
3 days ago

@14Reasons
It happened in the past. After the migrant crisis in Europe years ago they slowed it down

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Glen19
impossible to believe it

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Glen19
Interesting video recommended by Keith Woods | How Denmark SOLVED The Immigration Crisis:
https://tinyurl.com/ysratcvb

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Glen19
by what? 5 people?

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
already signed

@Glen19
3 days ago
There is a pattern of left wing parties reducing immigration after right parties increase it

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN the petition to FREE SAM MELIA!
https://www.change.org/FreeSamMelia

14Reasons
3 days ago
lmfao

the woodlander
3 days ago
good for david…

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
I like Farage but he’s not our guy

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Charles
mhm

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@14Reasons
Its pathological delusional thinking

14Reasons
3 days ago

@why
you aren’t one of our guys

@Glen19
3 days ago

@14Reasons
It wasn’t stopped completely but they did slow it down

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Glen19
I don’t believe most of mainstream data

Honkey
3 days ago
because these govts are just theatre for the masses

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
we should put Morgoth in charge.

@IPF89
3 days ago
labour are for open borders so more invaders

@Joesmith
3 days ago
blare was the worst

@why
3 days ago
Farage isnt our guy, but, he’s not motivated by money or blackmail.. He has a vision for the country and he’s single minded and will keep at it.

@Glen19
3 days ago

@14Reasons
Check out the left wing party in Denmark and how much they decreased it

withey
3 days ago
biggest channel crossing numbers yesterday

the woodlander
3 days ago
its a corrupt anti white system. dont take part

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Starmer is like a stepford wife

14Reasons
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
k

@why
3 days ago

@14Reasons
lol, you just outed yourself as a Uketard

@sonof7s
3 days ago
Putin is a Communist OBVIOUSLY!

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@14Reasons
I can’t take credit for that point. Just passing on a superchat from Rumble.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
I voted SDP at the local elections.

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Charles
time after time

the woodlander
3 days ago
sdp are very pro family, which is good.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
If Black Americans were given their own ethnostate I guarantee within 6 months it will fall into utter chaos and Whites will be blamed

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
and entropy doesn’t accept my bank card

14Reasons
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
right with putins multi racial utopia russia

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Someone superchat asking for Nativist bars. I’m out of odysee tokens.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
NATIVIST BARS

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Donation on Rumble:
kevinnormansavage
$5
I wonder if Putin might see his way clear to giving or selling us Ethno nationalists a nice chunk of land where we can thrive and be the best neighbour he ever had

Natty
3 days ago
thats good

Natty
3 days ago
lmao

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
0.01
If Just Stop Oil did a protest at a synagogue they’d have to be renamed Just Stop Moil.

@SomaComa
3 days ago
I think they both like eating cut dick

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
They’re both born blaggers.

14Reasons
3 days ago
yea farage with his place being pro invasion as a worthless traitor

14Reasons
3 days ago

@why
why are you even here

@why
3 days ago
Honestly, if you think farage doesnt give a shit about the UK youve lost the plot.

@cheflad
3 days ago
its like Diane Abbot ,she could race bait anyone until she had a pop at the Tribe ,then the hammer came down on her.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
200+ years of Black American failure wont magically be cured by bringing down confederate statues

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
so true

danzimmons
3 days ago
$1⃣4⃣*⃣8⃣

@SomaComa
3 days ago
wait who’s selling used cars here?

14Reasons
3 days ago

@why
lmfao no

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
hyper consumption. they aren’t designed for it. they’re supposed to be in mud huts.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
If they did it at a synagogue, they’d be called Just Stop Mohel.

@TheAyatollah

@why
3 days ago

@14Reasons
its obvious that he cares about his country

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
Come on lads. Only 6 more likes for the magic 109.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
well said Mark

the woodlander
3 days ago
taking an african and transplanting him in europe increases his consumption of commodities by 80% great for capitalism dire for the environment.

14Reasons
3 days ago
they’ll only attacks the states enemies

danzimmons
3 days ago
they’ll never attack any synagogue

@hunter
3 days ago
just stop oil are no threat to the state. perfect controlled opposition

@why
3 days ago
lol

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
poor horse

@why
3 days ago
Hed be dumb not to

danzimmons
3 days ago
paid actors

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
DEFO. Tollah. Fetch the noose

@why
3 days ago
Has Farage spoke about it?

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Tollah Telegram post regarding violation of Stonehenge:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah/5341

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Just Stop Oil were a state op to bring in increased police powers on protests.

@IPF89
3 days ago
they’re vermin

@cheflad
3 days ago
i Agree wth David Clews ,these groups are being promoted by the media and Establishment.

14Reasons
3 days ago
“bring down White history so brown people can have their turn to power”- pure evil

danzimmons
3 days ago
^

14Reasons
3 days ago

@why
uh huh

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
we must understand that the emotions that rule the left are anxiety and greed. while on the right those emotions are pride and disgust. just wait for people to get there.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
Sure, for now.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
pretty sure destroying White made statues wont bring West Africa to our level like they think

danzimmons
3 days ago
farrage the mirage

14Reasons
3 days ago

@SomaComa
the dildo that isn’t used for the conventional orifice

@why
3 days ago

@14Reasons
lol, i mean you know thats not true

Blankeon
3 days ago
Its good. Make it obvious to everyone that America is under Zionist occupation.

14Reasons
3 days ago

@why
he probably supports it

@SomaComa
3 days ago

@14Reasons
They are the dildo of the state

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
as temporary solution

14Reasons
3 days ago
they are basically the state

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Their logic is bring down White heritage because brown people cant build civilization

@SomaComa
3 days ago
they need to go

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
David is right about starving their oxygen of publicity.

danzimmons
3 days ago
lol

@SomaComa
3 days ago
The pussy hats create a lot of C02

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Stan1:
X:
Tweets by s_stan1
Gab:
https://gab.com/S_Stan1
Odysee:
https://tinyurl.com/4ter3r4y

14Reasons
3 days ago
the government is probably funding these stop oil bastards. because it’s what the establishment wants. destroying european history

danzimmons
3 days ago
all part of war on the west

@SomaComa
3 days ago
it’s not just a rock

withey
3 days ago
about 5000 years

@Joesmith
3 days ago
lol

14Reasons
3 days ago
these just stop oil people are terrorists themselves

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Fetch the noose

@SomaComa
3 days ago
yea someone would get a slap for doing that

@IPF89
3 days ago
just stop oil should be put in the stocks

ItsOkToBeANationalist
3 days ago
He means death to the conservatives in Minecraft

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
the goy are restless

14Reasons
3 days ago
I’d physically intervene. don’t care

Stan1
3 days ago
Always always against European culture & art

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Stonehenge has a fence around it.

@hunter
3 days ago
the government already basically agree with just stop oil.

@cheflad
3 days ago
again ,where does the just stop oil funding come from

@Joesmith
3 days ago
press 1 for gas

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
JOIN NOW! PA Membership Now Open! Only £3 per month.
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/join

@Gundobar
3 days ago
Every.Single,Time

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Kline

@SomaComa
3 days ago
(((Surprise!)))

@why
3 days ago
what happened?

@Joesmith
3 days ago
every single time

Honkey
3 days ago
EST

14Reasons
3 days ago
the real terrorists are propped up by the elite. good white men are lied about. the terrorists project and claim we are the terrorists

danzimmons
3 days ago
White people are already creating parallel societies in murrica

ItsOkToBeANationalist
3 days ago
Milkshake isn’t enough

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
REDS

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Capitol punishment for destruction of a national monument

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
Rope and Pole

14Reasons
3 days ago
they’re vandalizing beautiful things. they must be punished

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
It’s pre-historic

@why
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
yeah. They screwing up all over the place

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
hope so

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
this will be a crazy century with the collapses of the USA, russia, china.

@Glen19
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
It shows that it isn’t a lack of funding because foreign States gave funding in the past

@why
3 days ago
Ukraine is their plan b

danzimmons
3 days ago
can’t even contain sandal wearing Houthi’s lol

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
and they can’t trust anyone and they increasing have to rely on Jews and not their usual shabbos

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Reuters | US imposes sanctions on Nordic Resistance Movement in fight against white supremacy:
https://tinyurl.com/msme9drf

@SomaComa
3 days ago
The shitbags have taken control of all pressure points in white countries globally.

danzimmons
3 days ago
wait till Hezbollah is done with israel gonna be was real

@why
3 days ago
the citadel is under attack

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@why
yes

@why
3 days ago
Theyre stretched

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@SomaComa
it is nice

@why
3 days ago
Natty dead right

@Glen19
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Nationalists in Europe have worked with Arab nationalists in the past prior to 9/11. Hafez Al-Assad & Gaddafi even funded White nationalist organizations.

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@noreplacement
i believe that european states will split. and then the reconquest will begin.

@SomaComa
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
This is the best colour

@why
3 days ago
how much balls would it take to take ZoG’s money and betray them

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
It’ll be proscribed here next.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@SomaComa
the kek colour

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Terrible racist green colour

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@Glen19
and what are we doing about the devshirme system, the mediterranean white slave trade, the destruction of the roman empire, etc. they are anti white. wake up.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I always vote as well

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

@why
3 days ago
cant barage the farage

Honkey
3 days ago
write in for Hitler

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow David Clews:
X:
https://x.com/unitynewsnet
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/UnityNews
Website:

home

Telegram:
https://t.me/UnityNewsNetwork
Rumble:
https://tinyurl.com/ms7mnm7d
Facebook:
https://tinyurl.com/mr4ym3f8

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
yup

@SomaComa
3 days ago
The cool thing is that none of us want to be doing this

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for Clews

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
$5.00
Democracy = Plutocracy

the woodlander
3 days ago
as interesting as these elections are, and it is good to see the public moving slowly our way, im afraid the direction of travel for the UK has already been determined.

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
mark it doesn’t matter. look at ancient rome. they decided to go for 2 parties optimates and populares. they were the exact same thing. until augustus came it was all a complete joke.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
CLEWS totally ruining Mark!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PMSL

@Glen19
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
Germans have went to fight with Palestinians and received training. They have streets named after American & European martyrs. What are you on about?

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
PA FILM REVIEW – Dune Part 2:

Stan1
3 days ago
I’m likely to pass this time, so agree with David. All the candidates are not for me

@noreplacement
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
You are correct, it’s awful to hear them squirm and excuse their traitorous behaviour. I do say to my peers that I care more about their grandchilren than they do, despite being comfortable. I don’t have many friends ha ha. But beware, time isn’t on your side.

@SomaComa
3 days ago
What recourse have you got though when you’re not represented at all?

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Democracy is a scam

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Anarchism

@Glen19
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Being Pro-Palestine should be a Non-sequitur. I have no idea why it is so controversial

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Clews has got the Pooch bug!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@SomaComa
3 days ago
I’m sorry to fed post, but…..

ItsOkToBeANationalist
3 days ago
Reform aren’t standing in my area or I’d vote for them

withey
3 days ago
the only choice i have is SDP so i will vote SDP

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
voting is just offering them legitimacy.

14Reasons
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
allot of us don’t care for them. I think they shouldn’t be slaughtered by jews but that’s it

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
SDP are old-Left. Not bad

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@ADayWithoutYesterday
That was a fake accent he put on for years.

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
I thought Tollah was born and bred London but he’s got a northern accent.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@14Reasons
no we don’t

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Glen19
Thanks for your loyal and consistent support.

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@noreplacement
as I’ve said u sir are a particular case. completely opposite to the others in your generation. but they lived under the highest living standards in human history. it made them soft and fat. also numerically the largest generation in history. so all politics is voted by them.

14Reasons
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
‘far right’ doesn simp for non whites

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Glen The Chinaman on Gab:
https://gab.com/GlenTheChinaman

Blankeon
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
tragic comedy yes

withey
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
it seems SDP are centre left but are against immigration

ItsOkToBeANationalist
3 days ago
British democrats

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@14Reasons
and they still hate us. they would rejoice of the same happened to us.

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
Jeff Taylor UKIP.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
it is not taking the knee , we hve common enemy

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Galloway or Reform

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
Reform.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Reform

Natty
3 days ago
but it has no mass appeal BHP beacuse hes doing it whiles trying to avoid the paradigim of the “far right”

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ItsOkToBeANationalist
Thanks for your generous donation.

ItsOkToBeANationalist
3 days ago
$25.00
If six pointed Starmer + his handlers are smart, they’d reduce immigration by 5% and say to the media – we’ve reduced immagration. Normies will think he is a messiah. Great line up! Great show!

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow SerenaJB:
X:
Tweets by SerenaJB3
Gab:
https://gab.com/SerenaJB

@why
3 days ago
If Farage was anti-zionist, Galloway would possibly team up with Farage in a coalition… not that it will happen.

@SomaComa
3 days ago
it’s all fun until the golem rips their head off.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Ayatollah:
Main Telegram:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah
Off-Topic Telegram:
https://t.me/TollahOffTopic
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision
Odysee:

@TheAyatollah

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
I constantly make this point on X. The ‘woke’ are supporting the capitalist elite.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
money power loves mass migration

14Reasons
3 days ago
the left is severely disturbed

@noreplacement
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
Obviously I hope you are right, but the youngsters I talk to (outside of our sphere) are low energy zombies

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Homa_Tawk
Anytime.

danzimmons
3 days ago
millions of jewish golem’s

@Homa_Tawk
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
Cheers friend!

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Galloway is quite good on immigration, FFS, NAtty

@SomaComa
3 days ago
immigration is a golem

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
greetings

@Homa_Tawk
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
Hey bud!

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
yes

@why
3 days ago
they will never vote tory or labour while they have farage

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@14Reasons
hello brother.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
SCAB LABOUR

@why
3 days ago
red wall is going Reform

14Reasons
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
true

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Need leadership with courage

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Homa Tawk on Telegram:
https://t.me/Bunch_a_hunks

withey
3 days ago

@WelshNationalistJoe
if i cn watch it i will

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@Homa_Tawk
o/

Joe Marsh
3 days ago
We ruined two.of Galloways meetings in South Wales back in the day. He had to be taken out the back door

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
revolutionary politics

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@noreplacement
it is funny to us as well. seeing your grandparents care more about their pensions that the ethnic make up of the country their grandchildren will live in…

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
He seem like a old school leftie (tankie)

@Homa_Tawk
3 days ago
Gentlemen

@SomaComa
3 days ago
yea that’s distasteful

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Had a lot on with work recently, but I didn’t want to miss this one.

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
You can be right on all those things without cosying up to Muslims.

danzimmons
3 days ago
like i said, kommie bastards

withey
3 days ago
we need galloway to split the vote of left and muslim, but i hate galloway

@noreplacement
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
Polite and hate conflict ha ha

@SomaComa
3 days ago
I like Galloway, but he was wrong about south Africa

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
Ay up, Mark,. Long time no see

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
o/

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
o/

Joe Marsh
3 days ago
Im on a stream with the Irish at 9pm on twitter
https://x.com/OffgridIreland/status/1803191281000014320?t=_AGon72qSeyhaUu2pPSqBg&s=19

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Tenner say Galloway wins Dale, We on?

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@noreplacement
u are a particular case. the boomers are the 1st generation in history that decided to live better than their children. u are all very polite and hate conflict. our generations need struggle to flourish.

The Resident Baker
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Evening young man. Hope you’re well.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ourresidentbaker
Thanks for your loyal and consistent support.

@why
3 days ago
Som jew attacjked him

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Mark Collett video | Galloway Winning is a Blow for the System:
https://tinyurl.com/2tjs6ktu

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@RoryHerbert
probably

The Resident Baker
3 days ago
$10.00
Excellent show tonight, gents.

@why
3 days ago
Galloway and Farage in UK Parl would be epic

Mark Collett
3 days ago
I think the Muslims will go back to Labour, the rest to Reform, he will be squeezed out.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
SPOT ON, NATTY

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
$1.00
My American wife met Nigel Farage in 2015 at a UKIP conference and asked him who he was supporting for the 2016 US election. Nigel replied ‘Rand Paul’. My wife replied that he should support Donald Trump. He shortly changed his mind and he must have made a fair amount of money on that advice !

Joe Marsh
3 days ago
Galloway hates us

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Coming to something when me and Mark (NatSocs) support Galloway for him bloodying the nose of the System

@why
3 days ago
I think he will lose his seat also

@why
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
he released his manifesto today and he seemed really depressed. He was canvassing in Rochdale last night and tweeted that over 50% of people they spoke to would vote Reform..

@noreplacement
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
Nope, you won’t. We boomers thought we’d change things. You will soon run out of time and be the target of younger people. We need to work together, not look for scapegoats

danzimmons
3 days ago
intil they’re starving

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Zoomer Historian | Do British Veterans Regret Fighting World War 2?
https://tinyurl.com/bdzsdndt

Blankeon
3 days ago
How many times will the normies accept being tricked until they have had enough. That is the real question.

the woodlander
3 days ago

@WelshNationalistJoe
its a sad indictment on our leaders.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@WelshNationalistJoe
Zoomer historian did a great video on that

@noreplacement
3 days ago
I’ve heard from people who have met Farage over the years, that he is more base than his TV persona

danzimmons
3 days ago
^^

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
once the boomers are gone… then u will see an explosion of nationalism like u won’t believe.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Some very good takes, it’s a great panel.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
The “White Silence is violence” mantra is absurd. So being a passive uninvolved White person apparently is violent

Joe Marsh
3 days ago
Read the Unknown Warriors by Nicholas Pringle its full of people who fought in WW2 who say it wasnt worth it

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
$5.00
This should be an extra long show

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
^^^^

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
You’re on good form mate. :clapping_hands:

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
Clews is correct.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
Yeah, that’s what they said once the anaesthetic wore off.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
Ouch! :rofl:

danzimmons
3 days ago
Derrick Day has taste in transportation

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Candace Owens had a interesting take on WW2 recently

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Tollah’s getting cutt off more than a tranny

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
lol, that is very possitive

@noreplacement
3 days ago
Powell was of his time remember. Things were not as bad back then

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Robinson is too busy chasing leaves and sucking jew dick to be of any use.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow No Chance:
https://linktr.ee/NaeChance

withey
3 days ago
hail

@WelshNationalistJoe

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Joe Marsh (Welsh Nationalist):
Odysee:

@WelshNationalistJoe
Telegram:
https://t.me/realwelshnationalist
YouTube:
https://youtube.com/@WelshNationalistJoe

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
typical conservative. he was not revolutionary in his ideas. look at the german ’30s pre-meme drawings. they all came true.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
‘Rhetorical concessions’… Well said.

Joe Marsh
3 days ago
Powell was the Farage of his day

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Mark Collett:
Telegram:
https://t.me/markacollett
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/c/MarkCollett
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/MarkCollett
BitChute:
https://tinyurl.com/ynec2sys
Gab:
https://gab.com/markcollett

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Even leftists are redeemable if they have a +100 i.Q

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@SomaComa
normies literally don’t matter in political terms. they are the biggest eunuchs in political history. the most radical group always wins. so don’t go for quantity. quality is the most important.

Blankeon
3 days ago
Red zionist vs blue zionist. Pick your poison.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
We punch way way way above our weight

@Snow
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
shame

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Powell was a loser

danzimmons
3 days ago
kommie priq

@SomaComa
3 days ago
A normy is a potential fren

danzimmons
3 days ago
i helped the jew destroy White South Africa ~ G Gallaway

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
GALLOWAY is ant-ZOG

@why
3 days ago
I think nationalists are over thinking the Farage thing. He’s just promising the earth for the sake of votes. He’s giving a taster of what people want.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
I agree

@SomaComa
3 days ago
It is happening. You can look in your street and see it.

danzimmons
3 days ago
i saw a comment on George Bagby’s Tgram about Mark, how i knew he was streaming

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
It’s a postitve sign, but don’t trust Farage obviously.

withey
3 days ago
we must demand non-white deportations regardless of criminal or how long they’ve lived here

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
once the living standard really starts going down, just wait for them to actually turn to real nationalists. now they are living without struggle.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Woodlander’s website, The Woodlander Initiative:
https://woodlanderinitiative.co.uk/

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Good point, MARK

@Snow
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
Das macht es für uns einfacher, andere zu erreichen.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Remigration

the woodlander
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
i know.. good stuff

@SomaComa
3 days ago
We exist in a ‘first past the post system’

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
Sargon was the first to move and perhaps he dragged Farage along. Farage can’t ignore the younger commentators.

withey
3 days ago
??

withey
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
yeah the cucking with HnH is too much, was that just under tice

@noreplacement
3 days ago
you don’t have to get elected to influence politics

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Join us at Patriotic Alternative:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/get_involved

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
Galloway is suing HnH

@SomaComa
3 days ago
It’s true, it helps us

The Ayatollah
3 days ago
Barry Stanton 4 PM.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@withey
I have heard similar double standards

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Beer Hall Pooch:
Odysee:

@BeerHallPooch
X:
Tweets by BeerPooch

the woodlander
3 days ago
not sure i can advocate voting for a party that uses HnH as a vetting agent.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
agreed

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
indeed. but they are playing a dangerous game, because the people will be extremely mad that they didn’t deliver.

withey
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
i know a homeowner who backs 100% the farmer who killed the gypsy burgler yet can’t back kyle rittenhouse all because of the media

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Farage should never become PM, but he could be useful in destroying the Tories

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
David has a good take on Farage’s role.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
I despise the Royal Family, honestly.

@SomaComa
3 days ago
All of the bollocks and words and no action

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@SomaComa
exactly.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Get Clews on GALLOWAY

@SomaComa
3 days ago
it always feels like ‘pressure valve’

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Trump must loose

Blankeon
3 days ago
Pseudo-Nationalism

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Clews gets it

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Most of the Jewish billionaires support Trump

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@withey
the older generations.

withey
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
the people follow the media

Horse Consoler
3 days ago
pothole nationalism, simple as

withey
3 days ago
farage must rule before he can be dismissed

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
certainly

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@withey
of course he talked like a puppet. if he was an actual nationalist he would go on the attack. never allow them to dictate the course of the discussion.

Echo_Harp
3 days ago

@DoubleOhSieben
I know. And they live in Switzerland.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@TheAyatollah
more experienced, then

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Bjorn Hocke would be a much better leader of the AfD.

withey
3 days ago
for reform to go it must first fail

withey
3 days ago
farage hasn’t got to power yet

The Ayatollah
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Mordaunt is in her 50s.

Blankeon
3 days ago
Farage is just like Meloni and Trump. They sound good, but they dont deliver on anything and they are Zionists.

withey
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
so msm vultures are baying for blood, you must appear as a fellow vulture not a carcass

Echo_Harp
3 days ago

@mikefromcleburne
:hundred_points:

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
CLEWS GETS IT

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@mikefromcleburne
a lot of truth there

LoveLoad
3 days ago
the system is designed to give you hope and screw you in the end

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN-UP to the PA Newsletter (scroll down):
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/get_involved

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
what is good with this whole situation is that farage was pushed into talking about our talking points. and of course he is the zionists property.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Ironically lefties think they are against the system but they are actually fighting for the regime and dont even realize it

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp
agreed

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Brexit in name only

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Germans supported the great one because he was undeniably correct.

withey
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
true he’s no patriot but he just might be racist

Ethno Nationalist
3 days ago
14

Echo_Harp
3 days ago
The AfD voted against a petition calling for an end to arms exports to Israel. They are probably just a controlled bunch too. Too bad there are a few good ones in the party. But the top is conformist.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14

Horse Consoler
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
he wasn’t a banker, common misconception

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for more revolutionary shows like this

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@withey
u actually answered that with a question?

the woodlander
3 days ago

@withey
hes a man of the system, exbanker, he may have some right wing ideas, but ultimately he will buckle to what is best for the system itself

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
S. M. Lipset, who argues that electoral support for Hitler was essentially a middle-class phenomenon

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
No agreement yet exists among social scientists as to sources of naziism’s sudden electoral surge in 1930 and 1932. One widely held view, stressing the importance of the “outcast and apathetic,” has been sharply challenged by S. M. Lipset, who argues that electoral support for Hitler was essentially

withey
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
what would you say to msm?

@SomaComa
3 days ago

@withey
Farage feels more legit than most, even though he’s political and shits on people.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Get to :hundred_points: LIKES! HIT THE :fire: :fire: :fire:

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@withey
farage who said that his greatest political achievement was stopping actual nationalists? does that sound legit to u??

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Im getting off track. I just thought that is some scary stuff

withey
3 days ago
they say farage is further fight than what we think he is

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Agreed

withey
3 days ago
i believe farage is legit

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Farage is constrained, but like Trump, it’s better than the leftist rocket ride to doom.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
The lack of privacy is extremely concerning

withey
3 days ago
can’t believe the banana milkshake, they say different woman, they say she’s a labourite

@cheflad
3 days ago
looks like hes on course to win Clacton by some margin,so he’ll be in the HOC.

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
farage is the very definition of controlled opposition. without revolution their manifesto cannot be implemented. he will tell u what u want to hear and they will do nothing at all.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Through genetic genealogy

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
I read that every single White American can now be identified through DNA. One could sip a coffee and the feds get it and can know extremely personal information now

Horse Consoler
3 days ago
everything isn’t 8D chess mate

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@TheAyatollah
Mordaunt has a good rack

LadyOfMercia
3 days ago
it was a diff girl

Horse Consoler
3 days ago
it wasn’t the same girl

@MarkCollett

Blankeon
3 days ago
Equity is just rebranded Communism

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
indeed in name only. it was financed by actual german elite and former nobility.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
NEW: Mark Collett video | Farage’s Plan to KILL the Conservative Party:
https://tinyurl.com/bdzxu79e

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
I was looking to buy property in Virginia and the taxes are just insane. Cant I just live in peace without the system constantly trying to control me

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
we must understand that the more tyrannical they become, the closer that system is to complete collapse.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
The problem in Britain is the elites have played the classes off against each other for generations.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
They have gone mad with power and the people must push back

Echo_Harp
3 days ago
You might think that they think the state is God and its politicians are the angels.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
in Germany the disaffected middle class a very important role

@Ihtultu
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
I have to disagree with that. revolution is always fought between two elite groups. workers, farmers, peasants are simply drafted against their will. except for a couple of cases in china there are no workers revolutions.

@noreplacement
3 days ago
No offence taken

@SomaComa
3 days ago
The talk is for proletariat equality, meanwhile the fatcats eat in a way that makes capitalists blush.

@Joesmith
3 days ago
gust got ere 14

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Eddy
Thanks for your support.

@Eddy
3 days ago
$16.00
Thanks for the stream great lineup

@SomaComa
3 days ago
Blair is a Fabian society socialist

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@Ihtultu
agreed

Stan1
3 days ago
‘Activate the Farage’!!!!

Blankeon
3 days ago
Blaming Islam does not really solve anything though since Islam is not the problem. The problem is non-Whites in general.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Activate protocol Farage!

@cheflad
3 days ago
the man who bragged about taking down the BNP.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
It was called the National SOCIALIST German WORKERS Party for a reason, buddy

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
My opinion is that parents that send their children to private schools should receive a tax rebate equvalent to the cost of public school education.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Revolution always comes from the WORKERS

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
this will upset the Boomers

@SomaComa
3 days ago
With fatcat Oligarchs that creep in

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Government always wants their cut of our hardworking money

withey
3 days ago
homeschool

@SomaComa
3 days ago
It’s pure (((Communism)))

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Remove your kids from school

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
$14.00
very intersting

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
im speaking in terms of the military

withey
3 days ago
a prison cell for a few good years or killed within 30 mins of being on the battlefield

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Me and Natty are ex-military: NO WAY will we fight again

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
true

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
How the heck could we ever respect a government that’s actively working on erasing us. Patriotism is dead

@cheflad
3 days ago
but surely they know the ultimate outcome is mutual destruction..

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
SPOT ON, NATTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
But you need a tory style party for that , labour can’t do that

@SomaComa
3 days ago
WW3 3rd time lucky

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
damn

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Da,n, this is SPICY!

RedPillFrog
3 days ago
Enjoy the next month or two before the next dancing Jew boogaloo

RedPillFrog
3 days ago
False flag will probably happen towards the end of Summer right as people are heading back to school and work

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
No White American should ever even consider fighting for a country that has shown no loyalty whatsoever to them

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN the petition to FREE SAM MELIA!
https://www.change.org/FreeSamMelia

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Iran DID NOT lock up Sam

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
That’s why we need to question EVERY attack.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
They’re more than happy to drive our countries into oblivion for profit and Israel.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
a shooting wouldn’t be enough

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Jet fuel can’t melt through passports.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Get to :hundred_points: LIKES! HIT THE :fire: :fire: :fire:

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
Look at this utter mess we are left with

@PaganBear
3 days ago
They want to kill off white in a war and leave our kids/women with the brown people.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
They have the audacity to call multiracial society a strength. It’s clear increasingly everyday that the exact opposite is the truth.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
ACE point, Tollah

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
lmao

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

Stan1
3 days ago
57

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
If the reform party can destroy the tories , I think it is a good outcome for this election

The Awakened Saxon
3 days ago
‘James Baker, former US Secretary of State ‘We painted Hitler as a monster. The devil incarnate. Thus, we were forced after the war, to play along with this devil’s scenario. We could not possibly have explained to the people that the war was only an economic preventative measure.’

@PaganBear
3 days ago
If we are stupid enough to fight for them we deserve to die as a race.

pa
3 days ago
i aint fighting for starmer of sunak

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
We’re the Fash Street Kids

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
they can’t fight wars anymore.

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
Special Needs Platoon.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Bash street kids, lol

@IPF89
3 days ago
fat cnuts

Stan1
3 days ago
LOL

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
I think the days of the regime are numbered

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
ACE revolutionary Nationalist politics

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
White men back in British Army ads…..must be time for another ziowar

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Ayatollah:
Main Telegram:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah
Off-Topic Telegram:
https://t.me/TollahOffTopic
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision
Odysee:

@TheAyatollah

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp
Anyone who argues otherwise is either in denial or flat out unintelligent

@cheflad
3 days ago
Le Pen said yesterday that long range missiles shouldn’t be provided to Ukraine.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
CLEWS GETS IT

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago

@Charles
Indeed

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Labour is not a war party

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Ace point, Clews

withey
3 days ago
no marching it’ll be ‘enemy at the gates’ scenario

Charles Gerety
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp
Multiracial society for the most part leads to massive suffering

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow David Clews:
X:
https://x.com/unitynewsnet
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/UnityNews
Website:

home

Telegram:
https://t.me/UnityNewsNetwork
Rumble:
https://tinyurl.com/ms7mnm7d
Facebook:
https://tinyurl.com/mr4ym3f8

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
let alone a forced march in full military gear.

@cheflad
3 days ago
only one difference these days ,Russia have got Hypersonic missiles.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp
so true

withey
3 days ago
also the london riots type won’t leave the inner city estates

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
Diversity and Unity are literal opposites. Pick one.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@RoryHerbert
toolmakers are the backbone of heavy industry

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Axis of evil is a term Bush coined.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
National + Socialism = ideal

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
It’s going to be a wild ride, that’s for sure.

withey
3 days ago
can’t be unified with muslims

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
Fair point. Galloway’s 10-points is also revolutionary

@cheflad
3 days ago
as Sam Fender sang ,”high time for Hypersonic missiles ”

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
Some of my ancestors were toolmakers in Sheffield using the best steel in the world at the time.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@TheAyatollah
When Nativist tries to chat up Tory birds. “Scuse me love, give me one night and in 9 months and I’ll have you in Labour.”

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
Net Zero Immigration. 10,000 engineers leave, 10,000 illiterate unskilled Afghans arrive.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Is it’s conscription, RIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

the woodlander
3 days ago
reforms manifesto is pretty good, but nearly none of it wiould be possible to implement without a revolution, its just telling you what you want to hear, with no intention of doing it.

@alpha007org
3 days ago
Reform Manifesto read like Twitter right wing talking points.

withey
3 days ago
no one matched blair, but now it’s a whole different world

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Please consider a small donation of $3, $5, or $10. When everyone donates $3, $5, or $10 it adds up!
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
ACE CHAT. Revolutionary politics

@cheflad
3 days ago
things can only get apocalyptic.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Toolmaker is an honorable profession

withey
3 days ago
blair was young, strong and a gogetter

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
He made one specifically big tool…

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Typical middle-class cnt

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
Labour’s placards around my way have the Union Jack on them.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
Good to you as well

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
It’s all words from Starmer

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@TheThinRedLine
Good evening brother.

ThinRedLine
3 days ago
Hello Folks

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
or Fool Brittania?

@cheflad
3 days ago
the Faux Gatekeepers, Shills and Controlled opposition like Farage are going to fill the Void ,just when we need a Grassroots funded Right-wing party.

Stan1
3 days ago
Starmer looks like a rabbit caught in the headlights of a juggernaut.

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BritishGammon
agreed! That is what a friend of mine says

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
as in france, once u fail to pass a budget a revolution will follow.

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
Labour are quite capable of tearing themselves apart once the honeymoon period is over.

A Day Without Yesterday
3 days ago
I agree with Tollah’s take.

The Ayatollah
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
I might struggle to get it in. Unlike with actual dots.

@cheflad
3 days ago
the Labour Party arent even going to abolish the Bedroom Tax ,which 75% are disabled who pay that punitive Tax.

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
see, do as I say, happiness follows!

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Back on my feet, mate. Even working 6-9pm. Happy now

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Purchase Grandma Towler’s tea, coffee, and honey:
https://www.grandmatowlers.co.uk/shop/
NEW: The official Free Sam Melia Mug:

Free Sam Melia Mug

withey
3 days ago
green green green propaganda, muslim independents, lib dem clowning, non-white led tories, labour no passion no drive reform is energetic ……..it’s all up in the air

Natty
3 days ago
its hard to say who is worse

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
You laughed when I said that

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Galloway says Labour are worse than Tory

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
14

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Tay-sob

withey
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for WOODY

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@Woodlader.4
evening

withey
3 days ago
do we think the greens will take from liblabcon?

the woodlander
3 days ago

@RoryHerbert
hi rory

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
Good evening

@Woodlader.4
my friend.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Woodlander:
Website:
https://woodlanderinitiative.co.uk/
Telegram:
https://t.me/the_woodlander
YouTube:
https://tinyurl.com/367pzrj4
Odysee:

@Woodlader.4

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Evening

@The
woodlander

withey
3 days ago
hail

@Woodlader.4

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Galloway will win. A tenner says so.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
14

Better Based Than Erased
3 days ago
Yes that was a disgrace.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@Stan1
Thanks for your loyal and consistent support.

@cheflad
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14

)))Joker(((
3 days ago
GROUNS

Stan1
3 days ago
$14.00
Great show & guests. As my Grandad once said. ‘Embrace the struggle, enjoy the decline’.

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
14

@cheflad
3 days ago
1 Little Indian

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
14

the woodlander
3 days ago
gents

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
Apparently Farage is the most handsome political candidate according to a recent poll !

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
It sickens me how the public will go back to voting labour despite both parties crapping on us for decades.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
SIGN the petition to FREE SAM MELIA!
https://www.change.org/FreeSamMelia

@AlbionForever
3 days ago

@TheAyatollah
how long before you tell your “connect the dots” joke?

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
One Reform say “Blood and Soil! I will vote for them

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Steve Laws missed a shot by not campaigning under the slogan “Laying down the Law”

Honkey
3 days ago
good to see Clews welcomed onto these shows

Stan1
3 days ago
Pretty sure Boris said something similar in 2019

The Ayatollah
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
More dots than a pallet of dice.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
The Sunak family has more dots than a website url.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Labour will not have an easy ride. Clews is right

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Sunak is trying to curry f(l)avour with the Israel lobby. It’s a sari state of affairs.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
The Scots won’t vote for a brown man

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
A hung Parliament is our best bet. Let’s tie the System up in knots. Fk it. Disorder is now our friend.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Help this channel by hitting the icon for a like!

The Ayatollah
3 days ago
San(skrit) Diego.

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Sunak wants to skip off to the states with his family.

Stan1
3 days ago

@BritishGammon
you won, here’s your shekel – lol

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow British Gammon:
Odysee:

@BritishGammon
Gab:
https://gab.com/BritishGammon

@BritishGammon
3 days ago
I predict a victory for ZOG

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
ha ha David!

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Victory for the “Friends of Israel” lobbies.

)))Joker(((
3 days ago
awwwwr nawwwwwr

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Hahaha, well played David.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
LULZ

The Ayatollah
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Go ‘ead lad.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Soz, mate, Busy. 2 jobs now. Hope that cheers you up.

@MarkCollett

withey
3 days ago
vote reform vote SDP

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
650

@why
3 days ago
reform 40+ seats

withey
3 days ago
fear of labour, fear of the tories, both as bad as each other

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
sent weeks ago

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
I would advise everyone to vote Reform purely to help break up the Tories.

withey
3 days ago
hail

@TheAyatollah

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
The card? I’ve been busy. 2 jobs now. I’ll let you know

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Chief Moody:
Odysee:

@Chief_Moody
Telegram:
https://t.me/chiefmoody
Gab:
https://gab.com/Chief_Moody
YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@ChiefMoody

@why
3 days ago

@AlbionForever
saw that about Dowson

withey
3 days ago
hail

@Chief_Moody

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Wonder what Nick Griffin will think of Galloway suing HNH, given that he supports Galloway, and his employer Jim Dowson works for HNH.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Heil

@TheAyatollah

withey
3 days ago
SDP is in a pact with reform, i’ll vote SDP

The Ayatollah
3 days ago
Evening all.

Chief Moody
3 days ago
Evening troops

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
YOU HAVE BEEN SENT IT, did it arrive?

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@ItWasMadeUp

@RoryHerbert
Thanks for your ongoing support.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Clews is munching

@why
3 days ago
galloway might lose his seat, he said rochdale was 50% reform

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Galloway tuns on Hope not State!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Stan1
3 days ago
We are approaching some fun times I think – 14’s for all Nationalists.

@BlackwaterPark
3 days ago
Zero Seats?

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow David Clews:
X:
https://x.com/unitynewsnet
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/UnityNews
Website:

home

Telegram:
https://t.me/UnityNewsNetwork
Rumble:
https://tinyurl.com/ms7mnm7d
Facebook:
https://tinyurl.com/mr4ym3f8

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
$14.88
Great line up!

@RoryHerbert
3 days ago
$5.00
Just a thought

@MarkCollett
. I would appreciate your comments on ‘Just Stop Oil’s spraying orange paint on Stonehenge earlier today. I have a lot of respect for the woman who intervened. What is the panel’s opinion?

@noreplacement
3 days ago
14

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
0.05
Don’t forget, Tollah is also a rapper.

@noreplacement
3 days ago
This line up has the makings of a great cabinet when we win the election

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for Clews. He’s come a long way

Jagdeep Jano
3 days ago
Let’s goooooo hello lads

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow The Ayatollah:
Main Telegram:
https://t.me/TheAyatollah
Off-Topic Telegram:
https://t.me/TollahOffTopic
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/user/Tollahvision
Odysee:

@TheAyatollah

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
get MARRIED!

@AlbionForever
3 days ago
Don’t forget a rapper

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
JOIN the Patriotic Alternative gaming group on Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticGamers

)))Joker(((
3 days ago
o/

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
np

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Thanks for the info.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
FREE Mark Collett eBook | The Fall of Western Man:
http://www.thefallofwesternman.com/
Email Mark Collett: mark@thefallofwesternman.com

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Serious A-Team. Clews is a top boy

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
To donate to Mark Collett via Bitcoin Lightning (click DONATE):
https://www.thefallofwesternman.com/

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
ODYSEE SUPERCHATS: Type your message and before you hit ‘Send’, select the ‘$’ icon below the chat box or the coloured icon to send LBRY tokens.

withey
3 days ago
good evening all, 14/88 28

@BlackwaterPark
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
Oh man, that’s awful.

Stan1
3 days ago
David, Tollah, Mark, Natty – ‘the A Team’

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
This stream is also available on:
Rumble:
https://tinyurl.com/3p8t6k5m
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/MarkCollett

@ItWasMadeUp
3 days ago
14

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Mark Collett:
Telegram:
https://t.me/markacollett
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/c/MarkCollett
DLive:
https://dlive.tv/MarkCollett
BitChute:
https://tinyurl.com/ynec2sys
Gab:
https://gab.com/markcollett

Speak your mind
3 days ago
14

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
88

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
14

Stan1
3 days ago
14

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
14s for Azzmador. So long, mate. Sad news.

The Krypto Report’s Azzmador Has Passed Away at 57

@SerenaJB
3 days ago

@BaritoneHarmonica
Hello CB, thank you :grinning:

@Ihtultu
3 days ago
Good evening everyone.

@SerenaJB
3 days ago

@Stan1
Hello Stan!

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
o/

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Stan1:
X:
Tweets by s_stan1
Gab:
https://gab.com/S_Stan1
Odysee:
https://tinyurl.com/4ter3r4y

Stan1
3 days ago

@SerenaJB
o/

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@SerenaJB
Anytime.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Oh hello

@SerenaJB
I’m a big fan

@SerenaJB
3 days ago

@ReedJohnson
Thanks Reed! :thumbs_up:

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow SerenaJB:
X:
Tweets by SerenaJB3
Gab:
https://gab.com/SerenaJB

@EnglishRose
3 days ago
Hello

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Sheeeeeeeiiiiiiiittt

@SerenaJB
3 days ago
Good evening.

Charles Gerety
3 days ago
What up

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Please LIKE and SHARE the stream!

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Next pabtomime is the election. HAIL GALLOWAY!

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Lulz

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
I haven’t seen any of the sportsball… Have the Germans been singing Auslander Raus?

Natty
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
hahahahaha true that

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago

@MarkCollett
Get what?

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Anyone watching the Euro pantomime with Africa (France)? Romainai beat Ukraine 3-0 so they will get U.S. sanctions

Mark Collett
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch
did you get it?

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
This is just going to be Tollah on his own impersonating the rest of them.

@SouthernAsshole
3 days ago
LFG.. failed mobile gamer vibes..

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
Hopefullly some Nativist Bars during the interval.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Tasty chat tonight. Tollah’s my bro. I know his views

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Please LIKE and SHARE the stream!

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@BeerHallPooch

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Reed

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Super-mod Redd

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@AwarenessOfBeing
Thanks for your dedicated support.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Follow Beer Hall Pooch:
Odysee:

@BeerHallPooch
X:
Tweets by BeerPooch

Merry_Englander
3 days ago
$5.00
Greetings all.

Beer Hall Pooch
3 days ago
Tremendous line-up. Clews has come a long way. Top boy. Hopefully we will have some revolutionary Nationalist chat instead of the usual bitching about news of the day. Stop piss-arsing about with elections and the old failed ways. Move on.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@dsallen7
Thanks for your loyal and consistent support.

Carnival Barker
3 days ago
The Fairchild A-10 Thunderbolt II has a single 30-milimetre Gatling cannon, and two General Electric turbines. When it fires its gun and puts its engines to full, it will actually accelerate backwards. That is how powerful it is.

@dsallen7
3 days ago
$10.00
Conservatives Delenda Est!

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago
Please LIKE and SHARE the stream!

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@SomeRandomBloke
Thanks for your consistent and ongoing support.

@ReedJohnson
3 days ago

@JLPhillips
Thanks for your contribution.

JakesChannel
3 days ago
$5.00
What a fantastic line up, cannot wait to watch. Thanks for putting on a great show Mark.

Honkey
3 days ago
i like the thumbs down button too, then we can see how many nosebergs showed up

Open Borders for Israel
3 days ago
$5.00
did you see the US government designated the Nordic Resistance Movement as a terrorist group?

@chris
3 days ago
Why is there no thunbs down buttom any more. hum…

Honkey
4 days ago
Great Lineup :thumbs_up:

@ReedJohnson
4 days ago
If you would like to contribute to the stream, please use Entropy:
https://entropystream.live/app/markcollett

@ReedJohnson
4 days ago
SIGN the petition to FREE SAM MELIA!
https://www.change.org/FreeSamMelia

@ReedJohnson
4 days ago
Please LIKE and SHARE the stream!

@ReedJohnson
4 days ago
Patriotic Alternative official links:
PATV:

Patriotic Alternative Video

Website:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk
Telegram:
https://t.me/PatrioticAlternativeOfficial
Membership:
https://www.patrioticalternative.org.uk/join

0
0

==========================

See Also

top