Joel Davis: Welcome to the show. Apologies, we’re slightly late, there was technical difficulties, but we’re here. It is the 4th of November 2025.

 

Another show for you guys this evening and a lot to discuss, a lot to break down, before we get into the agenda. How are you doing? I actually haven’t spoken to you properly since we last did the show because I live in Sydney now, we don’t get to hang out so much, which is sad.

 

So how have you been?

 

Blair Cottrell: Good. Busy, working hard, trying to put together content for my business in my spare time. And I don’t mind the streams because now I get to play hardcore World of Warcraft every night we stream. It’s kind of the perfect slow paced background game. And my hardcore paladin is currently level 36. This is the first time I’ve played this character since we last trained. I’m pretty happy with it too. I’m pretty proud of myself. I got to level 36 without dying once, which is I think that’s a milestone. I don’t think I’ve done that before and I’ve been playing this game since I was like 14 or something, on and off. I haven’t been playing actually since I was 14.

 

But what’s been happening, …

 

Joel Davis: Level 36 without dying. Isn’t your birthday soon?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s on Remembrance Day. November 11th.

 

Joel Davis: That’s right, yeah. Remembrance Day, that’s like a week away. Everyone who went out of their way today to like put a bet on the Melbourne Cup or something, go out of your way on Remembrance Day to remember the fallen. More Australians gave their life in the First World War than basically every other war we’ve ever fought combined. So it needs to be reflected upon. We talk about it on Anzac Day often and so on, but it needs to be reflected upon.

 

The Anzacs were fighting for a White Australia. That’s what they thought they were fighting for, at the very least, they were fighting for the British Empire. And in the First World War, whatever you think of it, which I think there’s criticisms to be levied that the First World War was you know, Judeo-Masonic attack on the old monarchies of Europe and so on, from the Australian perspective, they were fighting for the British Empire in order to try and protect a land for the White man. For us here, that’s what they were fighting for. That’s why so many of them gave their lives.

 

Blair Cottrell: So I think too, if you were alive in those times and of fighting age, you were conscripted, was there conscription? Did Australians have to fight or was it all voluntary?

 

Joel Davis: No, it was voluntary.

 

Blair Cottrell: But if you were volunteering, you wouldn’t have been privy to all the information about criticisms of the mechanics behind the war. All you would have seen was war, like military recruitment propaganda about fighting for your country.

 

And that’s why you would have gone to war. If you put yourself back in those times, it’s very naive to believe that you would have behaved differently to how your great grandfathers behaved. You would have gone to war for the same purpose, to defend your country.

 

So I think it’s a mistake to denigrate soldiers of the past, because:

 

“Oh, it was just some contrived, you know, rich person business. It was some war put together by capitalists and they’re idiots for fighting!”

 

They still believed in what they were fighting for. Even if we have information now to prove those beliefs may have been misplaced, we still have to show respect for our ancestors. Right?

 

Joel Davis: Exactly! They were. And I mean, at the end of the day, we were a part of the British Empire and they were fighting to maintain British Imperial dominance, which is if the British Empire wasn’t brought down from within through traitors, jewish subversion and so on, then that would have been a completely valid thing. But by the same token, fighting the Japanese in World War II mean, obviously we don’t agree with fighting the Germans in World War II, but fighting the Japanese in World War II was obviously necessary to defend Australia from a hostile Asian empire with designs on our territories.

 

Blair Cottrell: Were the Japanese actually planning to invade Australian territory?

 

Joel Davis: They didn’t have really well developed plans to directly invade Australia. They did bomb Australia, though, and they did invade territories we controlled, such as Papua New Guinea. You know, New Guinea we actually got after World War I because New Guinea was actually under the control of the Germans up until World War I. And at the Treaty of Versailles, we basically walked away with control of New Guinea.

 

So when the Japanese got to New Guinea, they were effectively invading one of our territories. And we fought them there and resisted them there.

 

Also, we were part of the British Empire. The Japanese took Singapore off us. They invaded other kind of British Imperial holdings around Asia. So, yeah, it was a direct battle between our empire and theirs.

 

And ultimately, if we lost the Second World War to the Japanese, maybe they wouldn’t have invaded in the Second World War, but then they would have been this massive empire that we would have been at the mercy of and who knows what would have happened in the ensuing decades as a result.

 

[05:26]

 

Blair Cottrell: If the Germans and by extension the Japanese won the Second World War, what would that have meant for Australia, where would we be?

 

Joel Davis: I think we would have been forced to make an alliance with the Germans. The thing is, if they won the Second World War, that would mean some kind of victory over Britain for the Germans. If there was a victory over Britain for the Germans, then it would be like a Nazi Australia, I guess. It probably would have been pretty good. So that would have been pretty cool! But, you know, it went the way that it did.

 

Anyway. Rather than talking about World War II again, let’s talk about more current matters, more contemporaneous matters. I want to play this clip. It was publicized by The Noticer* in recent days, but I think it needs to be analyzed and discussed over and over again! And it got attention, but I thought it should have got more attention.

 

 

[* See: Police admit targeting nationalists and say it’s ‘concerning’ they’re forming political party-https:// www.noticer.news/police-target-nsn-white-Australia-political-party /]

 

A lot of cowards in Australian politics refusing to weigh in on this because they’re afraid of being seen to be sympathizing with Nazis, which is really pathetic! And it says a lot about the state of play and the rest of the Right-wing in this country. But I’ll play this clip. The person speaking is the acting Deputy Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police and it’s some Parliamentary committee [Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters] of some description. Here we go.

 

 

Female: And AFP [Australian Federal Police] can perhaps speak to this a little as well, Senator.

Nigel Ryan: (acting Deputy Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police) Yeah, thanks, Senator. I’m not aware of any specifics, but I think I can talk to some of the issues that we’re seeing and the things that we’re focusing on now, I don’t know whether you had the opportunity to hear our new commissioner, Chrissy Barrett, speak about the focus of the AFP at the moment and what we’re pivoting towards, particularly around issues affecting social cohesion and some of the groups that we’re seeing in society now that are affecting that social cohesion. Sovereign citizens are not necessarily a group, they’re usually individuals, but obviously of particular concern when you have a look at some of the instances of isolated violence more recently, particularly against police, that sovereign citizens have been partaking in.

I guess of more of a concern are some of those groups like the National Socialist Network, who we’re seeing trying to get into more of a political space. Our understanding is that the NSN is looking at whether they can form themselves as a political party, but we do see their activity more broadly. That doesn’t actually hit a threshold in terms of criminal offending, but the behaviour is concerning in terms of them pushing towards the line and a threshold that would be considered not violent behaviour, but disturbing behaviour in terms of what it means about how people feel about their safety and how they feel about the social cohesion aspect.

So to that extent, the AFP has formed new teams, the National Security Investigations teams, which are looking more towards those fringe elements that are working within society that are causing concern, but not actually meeting the threshold to have a look at where we can actively work in the preventative and disruptive space to dissuade some of those groups from some of their public behaviours.

Joel Davis: So, yeah, I mean, there’s a lot to break down there. Obviously you’ve seen the clip already, Blair.

 

I’ll say a few things. One, at the beginning he mentioned sovereign citizens. Obviously there was that recent occurrence in Victoria where Desi Freeman, the so-called sovereign citizen, I know they don’t like going by that term – that’s what the media and the police call them – where he killed two cops. Apparently the AFP is less concerned with people killing police officers than they are with us forming a political party because we might hurt people’s “feelings”. That’s quite incredible! He literally says in that spiel, that:

 

“He’s concerned about our behaviours which don’t meet the so-called criminal or violent threshold, but that we would disrupt so-called social cohesion.”

 

You know what disrupts social cohesion? Importing a bunch of niggers into my country! That’s what disrupts social cohesion! Deporting a bunch of sorry, importing a bunch of non-Whites of every different description into our country. That disrupts social cohesion. Because it means we don’t have a cohesive society because everyone is a different race. It’s pretty basic. They’re blaming us for pointing that out. It’s a total inversion of reality!

 

But yeah, now apparently it is now the police’s job to not worry about what crimes are. Not worry about people committing acts of violence, they’re less concerned about that. What they’re really concerned about is people trying to participate in liberal democracy who have opinions that differ from the status quo.

 

Blair Cottrell: Opinions that are “disturbing”. Not criminal, but disturbing. And they’re classified as such because they affect how people “feel” about social cohesion.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! So it’s just ridiculous! Obviously we have a constitution in this country that says we should have a representative democracy. Apparently the Australian people are sovereign. They get to elect their own leaders. Well, there’s an open admission there from the Australian Federal Police. They don’t actually believe in liberal democracy. They believe in this thing called “social cohesion”, which appears to be “White people being replaced and not getting upset about it”. That’s what they mean by social cohesion. Is that why people need to basically:

 

“Shut up and not complain about the fact that they are being genocided! The fact that we are being ethnocided!”

 

And if you complain about it, if you stand up against, if you try to form a political party and be political and follow the laws and don’t meet the threshold of criminality or violence, then the police are going to take it upon themselves, the Federal Police are going to take our tax dollars and then form special units that are going to disrupt that political party.

 

[12:25]

 

I mean, this is clearly unconstitutional, illegal. This is like a communist country. It’s like they’re basically admitting that they’re like the Stasi*, they’re like the NKVD*. They are political police, whose primary responsibility is to uphold the political establishment, not prosecute crimes.

 

[* Stasi: Official state security service of the German Democratic Republic (East Germany) The Ministry for State Security, commonly known as the Stasi, was the state security service and secret police of East Germany from 1950 to 1990. The function of the Stasi in East Germany resembled that of the KGB in the Soviet Union, ⁠ in that it served to maintain state authority and the position of the ruling party, in this case the Socialist Unity Party of Germany. Wikipedia]

 

[* The People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs, abbreviated as NKVD, was the interior ministry and secret police of the Soviet Union from 1934 to 1946. The agency was formed to succeed the Joint State Political Directorate secret police organisation, and thus had a monopoly on intelligence and state security functions. The NKVD is known for carrying out political repression and the Great Purge under Joseph Stalin, as well as counterintelligence and other operations on the Eastern Front of World War II. Prior organisation was the dreaded CHEKA.]

 

It’s quite an incredible admission. And what cowardice from the Australian Right-wing where basically none of them said anything about this. The only person who did that I saw were the New South Wales libertarians, like John Ruddick’s people in New South Wales as ideologically consistent libertarians. Ralph Babet said something and then deleted it, five to ten minutes later. He pussied out!

 

And no one else said anything. Probably because they’re partially happy that the Federal Police are going to fuck with us because they’re afraid that we’re going to take their voters away or something, that we’re going to come in and steal their spot! But it just kind of exposes the whole system for what it is! That these people who claim to be upholding democracy and all of this garbage, they don’t actually believe any of that it’s a total lie! It’s a total farce! And why are the Nazis at the forefront of free speech, democracy? Why are we the ones trying to uphold it? I mean, it’s a total inversion of the roles [chuckling] that are supposed to be denominated. But I think it’s an incredible story!

 

What’s your analysis, Blair? Like, what kind of tactics do you expect them to use because they said “disrupt”, they didn’t say they’re going to put it, … Obviously we don’t meet your threshold of criminality. They can’t stop us from forming a political party. They’ve got no legal recourse to do.

 

So I think some of the things that they’re doing probably is creating social media accounts and using them to spread misinformation about us, turn people against us, imitate us. We’ve seen a rise in fake NSN accounts online, causing dramas, a rise in accounts that seem like that all they do all day is just make posts about the NSN and how offended they are by us. And that’s the only thing that they post about. Who has time for that? You know, people usually have jobs and families and this kind of thing. So maybe it’s feds? Maybe it’s just all feds? A lot of these accounts.

 

What also they’re going to do probably frivolous lawsuits. We’ve had plenty of those. But yeah, other than making, basically doing psyops online and engaging with frivolous lawsuits, these are kind of the more obvious things. What else do you think they’re going to do, or are doing already?

 

Blair Cottrell: I suppose this explains why specialised teams of Federal Police officers have been raiding people across the country who are in any way, shape or form supportive of National Socialist Network or White Australia, raiding them on no evidence and trying to find some reason to set them up on charges. So this has probably been happening for a few months already. At least a few months.

 

And it’s really concerning because the term “disrupt”, when people in official politics use terms like “disrupt” and “dissuade”, that basically means anything. That means anything beneath the ostensible. And the ostensible must appear as legit. They have to act like they’re working within certain frameworks on the surface, but underneath the surface, that’s the realm of “disrupt and dissuade”. That’s like the tier of counterinsurgency. That’s literally anything, man! That’s anything they can get away with!

 

So that’s like a secret political police developing strategies to fuck with a specific group because they don’t want them forming a political party, and because they’re not actually doing anything criminal. I don’t think there’s any precedent for a Federal Police officer making that statement in Australian history. I can’t actually stress the significance of this is really fucked up! This basically means what I think this means, what it exposes to me is the Australian political system, the Liberal versus Labor voting system is extremely fragile. No one likes the Liberal Party and no one likes the Labor Party. They just kind of vote one way or the other based on traditional. And there’s no effective Third Position for people to vote their way out of that sequence, that never ending sequence of Liberal-Labour. There’s One Nation but they’re in bed with Israel. There’s the Greens, but they’re just communists.

 

So I think what they do, and I’ve said this before on previous streams, I think there’s like analysts within the government that run various scenarios through AI programs in order to estimate the effectiveness of a White Australia party. Meaning they run it through like a scenario system, a computerized AI system that’s going to give them answers based on the current political climate situation, based on the current environment:

 

“How many votes would a White Australia Party get if it was formed right now?”

 

And I think the answer is staggering! I think it’s really frightening them! I think they know that a White Australia Party could be like the next One Nation but bigger and cooler, younger, more exciting, more interesting. And because there is such a large silent White Australian voter base who can vote basically anonymously, I think it’s obvious that a lot of people would vote for White Australia Party right now! Not only is it new, fresh and exciting, it has its roots in tradition. And tradition is one of the pillars of power. You’ve got force, popularity and tradition.

 

And you’ve got to ask yourself what does the government have on its side right now in regards to those three pillars? Does the government have popularity? No! Does the government have tradition? It sort of pretends to observe tradition because it knows it has to in order to maintain power structure, but it’s actually trying to destroy Australian tradition and replace it with its own version of ceremonies and rituals, largely surrounding Aboriginal culture. Right?

 

[18:55]

 

The only thing the government has on its side is force. It’s operating on a single pillar. Whereas a White Australia party would have popularity and tradition on its side. So already the government is at a disadvantage. Even though it has all the resources, the only real resource it can call upon to defend its current position is force, is violence! And BC beneath the tier of violence, such as disruption and dissuasion, right? Which is all manner of cloak and dagger activities.

 

So I think they’re really worried! And I think they know they have to nip the White Australia Party in the bud! And I think there’s nothing they won’t fucking do to achieve that.

 

So it’s very concerning. It’s really concerning that the Australian Federal Police are now being used as a bulwark, as attack dogs against a specific group of young people coming together to try to form their own political party legally. As you said, how is that democracy? That’s not fucking democracy! And it just exposes yet again that we don’t live in a fucking democracy! So I don’t really know what to expect.

 

Basically, it’s:

 

“Brace yourself, lads!”

 

That’s my feeling. And my analysis, my intuition’s been telling me for the last six months that things are going to get really ugly. Because I could see the potential for a White Australia party. I could see it a year ago and the potential is growing! It’s especially going to grow in, how should I put it? In reference to what’s going to happen in England. Things are starting to heat up in England and around the West, the rest of the world. In Europe you’re going to see similar situation and people in Australia are going to look for a way to vote themselves out of a similar fate. And if White Australia is all there is, they will vote for it! It’ll get millions of votes! It’ll explode out of the blocks, I think.

 

And I think that’s what this is all about. Yeah. So very concerning times ahead, is where I’ll wrap up my analysis.

 

Joel Davis: Concerning, but it’s also exciting! It’s very exciting because I think, as you said, if they thought that it was going to be a dud, if they thought that we weren’t capable of achieving anything, then they just let us do it. They’d be like:

 

“Let them go down this path.”

 

This is going to be a more neutral path and a safer path from their point of view. You would think, they would almost, like if they didn’t think anyone would vote for us why not let us go up there and embarrass ourselves?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, that’s the thing, Joel. You don’t really need to be very intelligent to succeed in politics. You just need to be consistent and simplistic. I don’t mean like intellectually simplistic necessarily. I mean you just need that one simple, easy to understand message. You need to ground yourself in some manner of tradition relative to the culture that you’re trying to persuade, you’re trying to represent, and you just need to be consistent. You just need to keep pushing, keep fighting and protect your reputation as much as possible.

 

It’s not really rocket science, politics you’re basically trying to persuade simpletons to tick a box that says your name next to it. [chuckling] It’s not really a difficult process. And because the circumstances, the environment right now in Australia is perfect for a new, young, exciting party to basically steal the show, the current power structure is developing political police tactics in response to that.

 

And I think it’s going to be so something that we’ve never seen before. I think it’s going to be something that Australia, there’s no precedent for in Australia. So as I said, it’s like a brace yourself situation and prepare to support each other.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but what I’ve also noticed is that Australian police are very incompetent, …

 

Blair Cottrell: What makes you say that specifically? Give me an example of Australian policing incompetence.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I would say the way that they handled, for example, Australia Day last year we were in Adelaide. I think all they did was create a sympathetic scenario for us that gained a lot of positive attention and they tried to engage in a legal strategy that has been ridiculously unsuccessful, and just basically de-legitimize themselves and make themselves look stupid and mishandle the whole process. They have not been effective in stopping us. The only move they were able to make against us was more recently against Sewell, putting him in jail. But you know, that was an unforced error by Sewell. Like running up the police didn’t make him do that, run up a hill in 4K and beat someone up.

 

So in terms of like their strategic designs, the sum total of the efforts over the last two years are basically added up to fuck all, in terms of actually, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what it’s worth. It’s worse than fuck all! If you are in the position where you consider NSN an enemy or even a nuisance for yourself as a police officer or something. If you’re in a government position where you command police officers, you’ve made the situation worse for yourself! It would have been better for the police to do nothing than to publicly and aggressively arrest people for trying to host an Australia Day march. Like obviously that’s going to win sympathy from the public. For the public who loves an underdog, Australians love to see someone struggling against authority. They love an underdog!

 

[24:39]

 

So you’re kind of creating this hero class of people by policing in a manner as aggressive as that. So for them the situation is worse than zero. They’ve actually contributed to elevating you guys in. I think what’s really worried them is when you guys arrived at August 31, March for Australia rally, it was clear that you had support from the majority of the people there. Very clear! And people were doing interviews saying:

 

“They don’t even care if there’s Nazis here, as long as everyone’s united against immigration.”

 

And that means people won’t even care about voting for a Nazi party so long as it’s against immigration. You see, that’s what that translates into for any government analyst.

 

So I think that’s what’s triggered, … It’s one of the things that’s triggered this effort to create a new tier of political policing, which was already in the works before that anyway. But that really pushed it over the line because it would have proven their analysts correct if they had already ran the White Australia scenario through their AI sequencing. Then when they saw in real time people shaking hands with you guys, cheering you guys on, and just admitting in interviews that they’re willing to support you, like regular people, that kind of proved all the data they already would have been collecting. It proved it correct.

 

So that’s what’s motivating them, I think.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, the reason why people are supporting us is because they’re genociding the White race and people are waking up to it. I mean, it’s that simple. We’re actually behind the curve in this country from where it is in other Western countries.

 

I mean, I saw Lindsay Graham from the Republican Party giving an interview the other day, and he said:

 

“Oh, I’m from the ‘Hitler sucks’ faction of the Republican Party!”

 

He’s like:

 

“What how crazy is this thinking Hitler is awesome thing now?”

 

What is he implying? That there’s a Hitler is “awesome faction” of the Republican Party now? That’s crazy! Yeah, but there kind of is. And like the Overton Window has shifted so far the Zeitgeist, like the attitude of the people. And that’s largely down to social media, because what has happened with social media is the traditional media has lost its influence over the collective consciousness. There’s been a decentralisation of political media in particular.

 

And that means that jews don’t control political discourse anymore. And so jews and academics and all of these different, like, committed political groups that have advanced this agenda against our people. Now a more grassroots, a more independent form of political discourse exists. And so it will tend towards the authentic politics that we represent.

 

So what is coming? Like, where people are at now is already a lot better than where they were before. But what’s coming is way more than this! The next five to 10 years, there’s going to be an explosion in our worldview, particularly with young White people. An explosion! It’s inevitable and it can’t be stopped! Doesn’t matter how many laws they try to pass on censoring the Internet, how many divisions they create within the AFP to arrest anti-semites. It doesn’t matter, because they did all this stuff in Britain and it’s still happening in Britain!

 

I saw a opinion poll in Britain. If an election was held today in Britain, the conservatives and Labor between them would have like 29 seats out of a possible 650. That would be like if we were going to hold an election in Australia tomorrow and only three people were going to get elected from like Liberal and Labor. That’s literally where it’s at in Britain. The political centre has been eviscerated. And obviously the parties on the outside of that are still, they’re not perfect. They’re not what the kind of party we want to build.

 

But the point is that the old political formula has been smashed! It’s been fucking smashed in Britain! And it’s been smashed all over Europe and a new paradigm is rising and it will rise here, inevitably. Zoomers in America are more Right-wing than Boomers now. That’s insane! Like, no one was predicting this. Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson talking about the jews is like mainstream political discourse.

 

And then you’ve got like Ben Shapiro complaining about it on the corner of the Internet and no one’s watching anymore. That’s how it is now. No one’s watching the old jew media anymore. Everything’s different. Everyone’s Instagram algorithm is pumping out Hitler speeches at them. It’s become normal to talk about the jews now? It’s become normal to talk about these kinds of issues. And that’s just the start.

 

So when we come along and we bring a political party with the kind of policies that we’re going to put forward and the approach we’re going to be put forward, fuck yes, there’s a constituency for it! And they can throw the kitchen sink at us because we’ve already proven we will go to jail for this! If, I mean, we don’t want to go to jail, but if we have to, we have determination. We will sacrifice. We will continue pushing forward.

 

The Liberal Party isn’t going to go to jail to stay in the Liberal Party. The only people in the Liberal Party going to jail are the paedophiles that get caught. Like what happened to that guy the other day. Imagine if we had someone in our organisation, by the way, who got caught literally touching up a kid. They would call us paedophiles, right? Liberal Party literally just had that happen. Crickets! No one blames the Liberal Party.

 

But anyway, my point is this. The political establishment in this country is flimsy. It is weak. I’m not saying that we’re going to win an election anytime soon, but we are going to be a really disruptive force on this. And they can try and fuck with us, and they can try and put some of our guys in jail and they can make a nuisance of themselves. And I’m sure it will suck. I’m sure it will suck for me personally. It might suck for you personally, Blair, and a bunch of us, but we ain’t gonna fucking stop! And they’re not gonna kill us. I said this I think last. Do you agree with this take? They’re not like the communists of old. The communists of old would fucking shoot us. They’d just fucking kill us! These are fucking soft, they’re not gonna do that.

 

[31:13]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but there’s different standards now. It’s that there’s modern ways of being burned at the stake where it’s not really effective to kill. When you kill your enemies, especially in politics, you actually embolden your enemy further and you win more sympathizers for your enemy by how cruel your conduct is. And sort of factions within politics have worked that out these days. And plus, we live in this post violence era. Violence will always be a thing. It’s an eternal aspect of the world, our reality. But the era that we’re in right now is a post violence era, where everything except violence is basically permissible. Like, even down to the dirtiest, darkest tactics, so long as you’re not being outrightly violent, it’s all well and good!

 

And so, yeah, even though they won’t kill you, as I said, there’s modern ways for them to publicly burn you alive and sort of torture you, humiliate you in a political way. And that’s what you’ve got to be worried about, basically.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but it’s not as bad. They’re not going to kill us. So it’s like we grit and bear it. You know what I mean? It’s not the like, it’s bearable. Like this is not an enemy that you should be that afraid of:

 

“Oh, maybe if you work in one field where you will lose your job or something.”

 

Blair Cottrell: You say they won’t kill you too. How can you be so sure? I saw some information that Charlie Kirk may have been killed by some sort of mechanism that shot up out of the microphone he was wearing. That might sound a bit conspiratorial, but when I saw the footage, even I had to admit, sounds pretty weird! Do you think it’s possible that Charlie Kirk was assassinated by like an organised political effort by an overseas country?

 

Joel Davis: It’s not that it’s impossible! Like it’s possible, but I don’t think any of these theories about it was a mechanism on his body, blah, blah, blah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Have you seen the footage?

 

Joel Davis: If someone else was involved, they would have just like groomed a tranny to do it.

 

And then you’ve got the, like, they would like the way that it was described. Like it’s within the power of the intelligence agencies in America or in Israel or whatever to groom trannies into committing political assassinations or tranny fuckers nto political assassinations.

 

So I don’t think you need to have this elaborate:

 

“Oh, there was a device!”

 

You know, know all this kind of stuff. I don’t know why. We’ve talked about this before on the show. I don’t know what we’re going back to this.

 

Blair Cottrell: But I was just thinking about, because you said that’s the thing, …

 

Joel Davis: If they’re going around killing everyone who disagrees, why are they’re killing Charlie Kirk? Charlie Kirk was a fucking moderate! They’re not killing Nick Fuentes! They’re not killing like more radical voices. They’re killing the more moderate ones. That doesn’t even make any sense. Since Charlie Kirk has died, things have only become more anti-Israel, more racist, more radical! So you know, what the whole like, theory around it, …

 

Blair Cottrell: For the record, I don’t actually believe anything I’m putting forward here. I’m just saying that I saw that stuff on the Internet and a lot of people seem to believe it, but I was only throwing you something contrarian because you were suggesting they won’t kill you. Like these people won’t kill you.

 

But I think there’s some evidence they, …

 

Joel Davis: If they kill me one day, they’re going to turn me into a martyr and make me more popular!

 

Blair Cottrell: Israeli intelligence, yeah, definitely would kill you! But I think you have to be a pretty significant threat or you have to be projected to become a pretty significant threat for them to start considering that. Because, as I said, they run the risk of making you into a martyr and actually just building their opponent up even more.

 

But now we’re going full circle back to what I was talking about before.

 

Joel Davis: You’re doing like little haphazard killings is always counterproductive. You have to kill everyone. You just knock off a few people all you do is turn them into heroes and embolden the rest of them to get revenge and to kind of move forward. So, they’re not gonna kill every nationalist in Australia. There’s no one is shaping up seriously to do that it’s not going to happen. And they are creating obstacles.

 

Like, for example, there’s a lot of people that have not signed up on our website to be a political supporter. A lot of them is sheer laziness. And I know there’s a lot of the you lazy fucks that are listening to this right now, …

 

Blair Cottrell: When you say, …

 

Joel Davis: Wait a second, I want to say something. If you’re one of these lazy fucks that hasn’t signed up to our political party out of laziness, do it tonight! Do it now! Literally do it right now! You can do it while you’re listening to this or watching this, go to White Australia.org, sign up as a political supporter! If it’s just laziness holding you back, particularly if you live in New South Wales, because, that’s actually the key state where we need quick signups at the moment because, …

 

[36:11]

 

Blair Cottrell: What are you asking people to do? Because I don’t understand. What are you asking people to do when you say sign up as a political supporter, what does that mean? What are you asking?

 

Joel Davis: It means basically you, … We have an encrypted database, right, that you basically import your details into on our website. It is highly encrypted. We do not want anyone getting doxed and they won’t! It’s a highly encrypted database that you know is not going to be breached.

 

Blair Cottrell: But what information do you need? What information?

 

Joel Davis: Your basic details. Your name, address. But it has to be what your electoral role address where you’re enrolled to vote. And we can send that off to the Australian Electoral Commission to then say, we’ve got enough members of our party to register the party.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t mean to be, … Maybe it’s not the right question, but I’ll ask it anyway. Do you trust the Australian Electoral Commission?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I mean, yeah, they’ve never leaked anything like this before. So there’s privacy laws. It’s like the cops know, like ASIO know who all of you are! They can figure out every single person who watches one of these streams on their phone or something. They can figure out who you are. Right.

 

So you’re already on a list that the government can access, but they don’t just publish it. That’s not how it works. And it’s not going to be how it works. So people need to fucking chill. It’s never been like that and never will be like that.

 

Secondly, how the fuck are we going to do anything unless we build a political vehicle in order to advance our ideology, our worldview, our position with the Australian public? So if that means you have to take a little bit of risk, obviously it’s not really much of a risk. We are protecting your ass! We’re not asking you to put on the black block and go march in the street, yell “hail victory”. Just asking you to sign up to a political party. And there’s legal protections. You’ll be fine. And we’ve encrypted our databases.

 

But yes, that’s the small sacrifice you have to make of spending two minutes inputting your correct details into our website so that we can go and register a political party and perhaps get thrown in jail! We’ll deal with all the difficult shit for you! All you have to do is just sign the paper, put the fries in the bag. That’s all you got to do. So just do it! Particularly if you’re in New South Wales.

 

And then also don’t just do it yourself. Go to your friends, go to your family and get them to do it. Get them to do it as well. Get as many people as you possibly can to do it! We need as many members as possible. The more members we have, the more momentum. Like even once we reach the minimum thresholds, the more members, the better. And they’re going to audit the members. Some people are going to move house or have put in the wrong details or whatever.

 

And so we’re going to need to have a glut of members, like I’ve explained before. It’s such a minimal thing. That’s such a minimal ask. It’s a really minimal ask!

 

Blair Cottrell: I noticed someone in your organisation, one of the leaders I saw through Noticer News tried to register “White Australia” as a business entity through like some sort of government business or like regulatory board.

 

And the response from this board was that the term “White Australia” because it meant White ethnically, the registration request was rejected on that basis because it was like offensive or something.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that was to register a corporation. That wasn’t to register a party.

 

Blair Cottrell: I know that. My question is, has there been any progress with that? Because I know that that same board accepted a registration request from Black Lives Matter and registered them as a corporation, but they said no to White Australia because of the term White. But they didn’t have a problem with the term “black”. I wonder if there’s been any update with any response.

 

Joel Davis: We just registered under a different name. We couldn’t be, there’s an appeals process, but we just couldn’t be fucked with it because it doesn’t really matter that much.

 

Blair Cottrell: It would have been a good test because you’re probably gonna get the same response from the AEC.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, you know what would be an even better test? Building the fucking party!

 

So that’s why we’re focusing on that rather than dicking around, on arguing over registering corporations and stuff, because it’s a side issue, you know what I mean? But because a lot of people said:

 

“Oh, you can’t have your party because of that!”

 

It was like, it was almost like we shouldn’t have like put that out there because people don’t read past the headline and it confuses people. But they won’t be able to block the political party on those grounds because the Electoral Act doesn’t give them the same kind of leeway and the Constitution doesn’t give them the same kind of leeway on political parties, that they have with corporations.

 

And I think we would have won the appeal on the corporation, but it would have cost thousands of bucks and it would have taken a while and, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It would have said a precedent though too. So then you could have used the same argument with the aec. That’s what I was thinking.

 

[41:04]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we can look into, we can look into still doing it down the track, but it becomes a bit of a drawn out process anyway.

 

But when it comes to the party, like people just need to sign up! In New South Wales election is in March 2027. There’s a Victorian state election I think next November and then the following March in 2027 is the new South Wales election. So it’s some time away. It’s like a year until the Victorian election and then a year and four months till the New South Wales election and then the following year we’ll have the next federal election. Those are the three elections we’ve got our eye on. WA doesn’t have an election for years. Queensland doesn’t have an Upper House and so it’s less worth focusing on.

 

And the other states are kind of irrelevant, to be honest, not fully irrelevant, but they’re kind of irrelevant in terms of the national conversation. So Victoria, New South Wales are the two main, two biggest states, the two states where we have the most members and the two that we wanted to target first as a political party.

 

But in Victoria you only need 500 Victorian members in order to contest their state elections. And so that’s going to be a lot easier for us in Victoria. In New South Wales it’s 750. And in New South Wales, if you’re not, if you’re not registered a year prior to the election, you can’t get listed on the ballot paper.

 

Additionally, New South Wales, we probably have a better chance at actually getting someone elected than in Victoria, not because we’d get a higher percentage of the vote necessarily in one state or the other, but because of the system. So in New South Wales, like John Ruddick got elected off like 3% of the vote because New South Wales, they don’t have group voting. It’s more like kind of the Senate election in the federal election is kind of the same in the New South Wales state election.

 

Whereas in the Victorian state election they break the Upper House down into eight zones, three regional zones and five metro zones. And the top five from each of those zones get elected.

 

But the thing is that in Victoria, in the state election when you., … That seems like a good system, you just have to come fifth in your zone and you can get in. That doesn’t sound so hard. But and we probably could still do this. But the more difficult aspect of it is that in Victoria people usually don’t vote below the line and preference all of the different parties, they just put a vote above the line and then they get automatic preferencing. So we would have to do preference deals with all these other parties and get them to preference us high in order to get all their preferences. And it’d be really difficult because we’re Nazis and they’re probably not going to work with us. Who knows? We can cut some deals but it might be hard.

 

In New South Wales cutting the deals isn’t the same level of difficulty because there is an automatic preferencing in how people vote. So in New South Wales in theory we will get more preferences, you would think. So that’s why we really want to be registered to contest this election in New South Wales.

 

So if you live in New South Wales, sign the fuck up! ! We are desperate, and do it immediately because I would really much like it if we can get above the line that election, it would be great! But I’m going to stop talking about that. I know people are probably annoyed at me yammering on about that.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, we’re never annoyed about your yammering, Joel! Yammer away!

 

Joel Davis: I guess that’s what the show is. That’s literally why we’re here.

 

Blair Cottrell: But well you mentioned Remembrance Day, …

 

Joel Davis: Because people, Australians, one thing about us, and I’m like this too, we’re fucking lazy! We can’t be fucked as a people.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know if, would you say we’re lazy?

 

Joel Davis: We work hard, but when it comes to like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I think we’re more, we’re a bit black pilled on politics. I think that’s what it is. I just don’t think we like politics. Australians have a general disinterest. They don’t think there’s any hope. They think it’s all bullshit!

 

Joel Davis: That’s true. But also people are fucking lazy. People are fucking lazy in terms of doing it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Mental laziness that leads people to think this stuff too. Because politics is made to seem a lot more complicated than it really is. At the end of the day it’s just when you’ve got a homogenous society it’s different ideas competing, usually economic ideas and then there’s a few subversives in there trying to fuck your country up. If you have a good intelligence system it prevents that from happening.

 

We don’t have a homogenous society anymore. We have a multi-ethnic society. And so all politics is now is different ethnic groups trying to get an advantage over each other. It’s just different ethnic groups and some ethnic groups, namely the White ethnic group that’s currently in Parliament is working against its own ethnic interests. Generally speaking. And it’s happening in England, it’s happening in Europe. As soon as society becomes multi-ethnic political politics becomes racial. It’s just different racial groups battling each other to try to get an advantage or to try to put the other group at a disadvantage. And it’s really that simple. There’s Nothing else to consider in politics right now!

 

So you mentioned Remembrance Day, though, and I was curious, what would I call them? People from Sydney, New South Walers. What do people in New South Wales do for Remembrance Day? What do you do? Is there somewhere in the city that everyone goes?

 

[46:31]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we don’t really have, like a massive shrine, like in Melbourne, which I mean, I was in Melbourne for the last two Remembrance Days and so I was able to go to the Shrine of Remembrance, which is better.

 

Blair Cottrell: But what about Hyde Park, there’ a big stone structure?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. In Hyde Park, there is a big War Memorial.

 

So there’s something, but it’s just not as impressive as the temple, basically, that exists in Melbourne to the Anzacs, which is probably the most magnificent building in Australia. But we can talk about Remembrance Day next week because that’ll be the week of the show. I really want to talk about.

 

Blair Cottrell: I just want to say something about it.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, okay. Okay, go ahead.

 

Blair Cottrell: The date November 11th is significant for a couple of reasons. Ned Kelly was hanged on November 11th. And I’m pretty sure the Berlin Wall came down on November 11th as well, I mean, that’s not necessarily pivotal for Australia, but it’s definitely a pivotal moment in European history. I’ll just say a lot of significant stuff happens in November, and November 11th, like there’s this whole list of weird shit that happens on November 11th. I don’t know if anyone knows any more about that than I do, but if you’re into that kind of stuff, hit me up because I’m interested to learn more about the strange occurrences that always seem to take place throughout November.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I don’t know what are you alleging, what’s going to happen?

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know, it’s something to do with the stars, man! I’m telling you. Usually radical change, violent change, or just something really significant tends to be happening throughout November, historically speaking. And I don’t know why that is. Someone might have a better idea as to why that is. I’m not really talking from a numerological perspective. I’m not into numerology at all! But, yeah, I’m just throwing it out there. It’s always made me feel a bit weird about my birthday, too. It’s just like:

 

“Oh, God, what’s going to happen to me?”

 

Cukg Time will tell!

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, on the party, I’ve been working a bit on the policies that we’re going to have and we haven’t put them out yet because it’s one thing that Tom can actually have some input in from jail. So send him some a draught and we’ll see what he thinks. He might have a few different ideas so we can at least work together on something even though he’s in prison.

 

But a few of the ideas that I’ve had, I mean, we’ve spoken about some of them on the show. Some of the policies that we agreed upon, like debt forgiveness and mother’s allowance and executing paedophiles and things like that. But a few others.

 

I was going to get your takes on some of my ideas Blair, of policies here or some of our ideas.

 

Blair Cottrell: You care what I think?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course.

 

Blair Cottrell: Let’s do it!

 

Joel Davis: Of course. So one idea for a policy that is oh so necessary is pretty basic, but just got to have restoring free speech in the platform. Now some people will call me a cuck. They’ll say:

 

“Why are you trying to restore free speech? Why are we trying to give free speech to communists and brown people?”

 

Now, yes, from an ideological standpoint, I don’t agree with giving free speech to everyone because I don’t believe in giving free speech to my political enemies. But considering the fact that it’s our speech that is being rejected, not theirs, I think tactically it makes sense to advocate for restoring free speech because it’s really only our speech that’s under threat.

 

So there’s that. Another policy area that we think is very important because we don’t have too many. We have like 10 policies and just call it there and keep it simple. Because as you said, Australians aren’t going to bother to read 50 policies and have opinions on them. But another policy is, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I do think free speech is dangerous because that makes you receptive to enemy ideology.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but the enemy ideology already has freedom. Our ideology is the one that’s restricted.

 

Blair Cottrell: So basically you want to reverse the current circumstances.

 

Joel Davis: At least level the playing field. I think that’s the right tactical decision. But yeah, well, maybe you don’t. Should we run on taking away communist speech or something? I don’t know.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, no, I just think just certain there just should be agencies dedicated to counter subversion.

 

So like if you’re identified as a subversive unit group ideology, then you don’t have many rights basically. And that can be abused, that kind of policy. So there would need to be some sort of oversight in place to prevent it from being misused. That’s the thing that we had ASIO, which is Australia’s version of like a security agency. Would it be the Australian version of FBI Joel? Is that accurate to say?

 

Joel Davis: It’s like NSA, FBI? Yeah, it’s like a few agencies in America mixed together.

 

[52:08]

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, subversion or working against subversive tactics was part of ASIO’s definition of state security before the Hawk Labor government, I think up until around 1989, around the year of my birth, somewhere around there perhaps. But the Hawk Labor government actually put ASIO to the test because they accused them of using the term “subversion” to intrude upon the freedoms of certain groups and personalities.

 

And so the Hawk Labor government removed “subversion” from ASIO’s definition of state security and replaced it with “politically motivated violence”. So I’ve spoken about that a few times because I think that was a real pivotal moment in Australia’s history because we had a state that was making some effort to prevent hostile ideology from taking root in institutions like schools, police departments, government agencies.

 

But that was all just removed by the Hawk Labor government. And instead our national security or intelligence agencies were refocused on just violence. As though pushing people around in the street because of ideology is more of a threat to the nation than teaching kids transgenderism and communism. You know, obviously subversive ideology is more of a threat than direct violence a lot of the time.

 

So I think that was one of the greatest mistakes any government has made in Australian history.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but that leads to the next policy which is like restoring patriotic education. Like getting rid of all anti-White garbage out of every level of education, including the universities, and restoring pro-Australian, pro-White version of how history is taught and also compulsory martial arts for all boys. Because I think we need to become a nation of fighters. That’s our education policy. I think if you fix it, the level of education, just regulate education correctly.

 

Blair Cottrell: You can’t run a nation on love. You can only run nations on hate. Like the current civilisation is run on hatred of White people.

 

So if you reverse that situation where suddenly White people are no longer the hated enemy which unifies all of multicultural society, who’s the new enemy? Who are we united against?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we’re not going to like create an education policy of like, we’re going to build an education policy of fuck jews, and make like anti-semitism, [chuckling] like official government like that, I mean, it’s probably not a smart angle. Like the Left didn’t do that. The Left appealed first to free speech and to equality and so on, first.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but that’s boring now. The reason conservative elements of society are failing right now is because appealing to all of this moral goodness is fucking boring! ! And we’ve got a desensitized youth who are looking for more edgy messaging. And Hitler sold anti-semitism to people openly and they took it.

 

Joel Davis: You can sell it to people openly like a political strategy.

 

But in terms of like, I mean, the point is that like the education system is basically penetrated or just like overwhelmed with anti-White ideology, like a genocidal ideology against our people. Basically. It just needs to be like reversed.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but the point still stands like within that edgy. You’re saying the Leftists are being crafty. They’re not really like, you go into a university and they’re like:

 

“White people are responsible for all the fucked up stuff in the world.”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know what I mean? Like you want to change it to:

 

“Jewish people are responsible for all the suffering of the nations.”

 

Like you want to flip that.

 

So the whole mantra of the education department would replace the enemy of society. It’s currently White people. It would need to be someone else, is the point that I’m making, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean patriots have many enemies. So like the historical enemies of patriots have been jewish subversion.

 

I mean, you talk about ASIO, the reason why ASIO [Australian Security Intelligence Organisation] came into existence in the first place was because jews immigrated here from Eastern Europe after World War II and they were communists, because all jews in Eastern Europe were communists at that time, basically.

 

That’s why they all had to be put in camps during the Second World War, which was against communists, by the Germans.

 

But anyway, they started stealing. They started infiltrating our government and stealing state secrets and giving them to the Soviet Union. That’s why they had to create ASIO to create a barrier. They never even needed to have something like ASIO before World War II because our country was so homogenous that there just weren’t any traitors. So there was no traitors to deal with. [chuckling] That’s the power of a homogeneous society, what it can achieve.

 

But yeah. What do you think about compulsory martial arts for all boys? I think that’s a good policy. I think we need it.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s okay. I always said that you should give people a choice because forcing all people through the same pipeline doesn’t always produce, …

 

Joel Davis: Children don’t get choices. Children get forced into all kinds of shit! Children don’t get a choice:

 

“Hey, would you like to learn how to read? Would you like, . ?”

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, no, no, the choice is pretty, like it’s not that much different. I always thought, and I’ve had you disagree with me on this before. I thought you should be able to choose between two years military service or an apprenticeship in a specific trade such as carpentry, bricklaying, plumbing, something like that.

 

So you’re either demonstrating yourself as useful to defend the country as part of a huge reserve army, you know how to use weapons, et cetera, and you’ve also had your mind and body hardened by the military training. Or if you don’t want to do it’s not your thing, you can learn a valuable skill and become useful to the nation in that way. You don’t have to do it. You can do your apprenticeship and then choose to go into university or do something else. But I’ve always thought or said you shouldn’t be able to become a citizen until you complete two years military service or complete a trade. That’s what I think.

 

[58:10]

 

 

Joel Davis: I agree with compulsory military training. I don’t agree with people being forced to do a trade.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s because you’ve never done an apprenticeship. You don’t know how tough it can be. It’s tough on your mind and stuff on your body.

 

Joel Davis: I did, I was a locksmith apprentice, once upon a time.

 

Blair Cottrell: A locksmith? Did you? Yeah, but you need to do some time on the shovel, Joel! You need to dig some trenches!

 

Joel Davis: I’ve worked in construction, I’ve done my time on the shovel. I’ve worked in landscaping.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay. When did you do that?

 

Joel Davis: In Sydney, when I was younger.

 

Blair Cottrell: But like, then you got to understand the value, right? Like, it’s great to have soldiers, but you’ve got to have people who can actually produce something, who can build, who can plumb, who can wire a house.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, everyone’s going to do that anyway. Everyone’s going to get a job anyway. The, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s not true, though. No. People don’t get a job unless they have to.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, you do have to. How are you going to get money?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, right now the government will give you money for being a retard!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, obviously we’re going to do something about that. We can’t have 18% of the country on NDIS or whatever it is. Like, it’s ridiculous!

 

Blair Cottrell: Look, all I say, I’m a big advocate of learning a trade. Even if you don’t stick with it. To me is of equal value to learning how to defend the country with like real military.

 

Joel Davis: Objectively, not of equal value if you’re at war. Obviously nothing is more valuable.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, obviously. Well, not necessarily because you still need amenities, you still need transport.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course, I’m not saying that being a tradie is bad or something, but what I’m saying is if you got a kid who’s going to become a lawyer or something, we don’t need to be a tradie first.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, no. I think it’s about character building in that case. So even if he never becomes a bricklayer, if he does three years bricklaying before he goes to university to learn to become a lawyer, he’s learnt about the grit, the reality, the harshness of reality through three years of bricklaying, which is hard labour, right? Not just the labour itself, but the way you’re treated by the guys who you’re going to be working under. It builds character.

 

Joel Davis: Everyone be a bricklayer?

 

Blair Cottrell: But look, think. Have you ever played a strategy game like Warcraft 3, for example, back when it first came out? You can’t do anything without the worker unit. You can’t build soldiers without the worker unit. You can’t mine minerals without the worker unit. The worker unit is the beginning of everything. Building strong workers with good spirit, good character is, I think, it’s possibly even more valuable than having soldiers.

 

Joel Davis: Well, what I think is that when it comes to compulsory military service, I don’t think that people should be forced to serve in foreign wars. We should only ever, and that’s actually in the Constitution. You can’t conscript people to fight foreign wars under the current Australian constitution. The only pretext for conscription would be if Australia was like, invaded and we were like fighting a war of national survival.

 

Blair Cottrell: And that’s the benefit of having like mandatory military.

 

Joel Davis: But you could still force everyone to train for a year. They wouldn’t have to get deployed, but you could at least make everyone train so everyone knows how to use a gun. Everyone knows how to, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But that’s the point. But then if Australia does get invaded, if everyone’s done, two years military service in order to achieve citizenship.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: They’ve at least trained a huge reserve army of like everyone who knows how to use a gun.

 

Joel Davis: If every boy in Australia grows up doing martial arts, grows up doing combat sports, then they go and do their military service, then you’ve just got an entire nation of fucking beasts! You know what I mean? Everyone can fight. And then your baseline is so much higher than any other country at that point. That, to me, that’s going to be our policies.

 

Blair Cottrell: But did you do martial arts?

 

Joel Davis: Being bricklayers, that’s a bit extremist for me. I’m too moderate.

 

Blair Cottrell: Hang on! I think I explained my case pretty well. I’m surprised that you don’t agree!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I just don’t think you need to force people into particular fields in the economy. I think people can pursue their own career path, obviously if they’re doing nothing. But everyone doesn’t have to do a trade.

 

Blair Cottrell: My perspective is one of the reasons we have a lot of the problems we have is because we have weak people in positions of leadership and they wouldn’t be weak if they did a trade when they were young.

 

[1:02:41]

 

Joel Davis: Well, I know plenty of tradies who are soft cunts! So I don’t know.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like these days they work differently, I suppose. Maybe it’s just the way I was worked.

 

Joel Davis: But like, also, there’s different trades too. Like I said, if you’re a Sparky [electrician], like, you just walk around just plugging things in. It’s not really that hard.

 

Blair Cottrell: You still crawl around inside ceilings, underneath houses, occasionally have to dig around in, …

 

Joel Davis: In like in awkward spaces. Like, how’s that special? Like, I don’t know.

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re providing electricity to the community. It’s very special.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, they get paid well. Sparkies get paid well. But we don’t need to make everyone be a Sparky to like have a society or something like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. I think we have a very spoiled generation who just think that things just happen! They think that guns just get made and buildings just. Lights just turn on and shit just works because that’s how things have always been for them. But when the shit hits the fan, man, you’re gonna need to have a lot of maintenance men. You’re gonna need some men who know how to build shit and maintain shit! Otherwise no one’s gonna know even where to start.

 

Joel Davis: You know, Australia has one of the highest, I think we have like the second highest builders per capita of like any country in the world.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, they’re all going broke right now too, like it’s hard, hard times out there because we’re bringing in a lot of foreign people who are undercutting local builders but then producing really shit houses!

 

Joel Davis: Garbage! Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And yeah, people just getting ripped off and going broke left, right and centre. You have to be a pretty reputable builder with a good reputation to survive out there. I heard that Matt Trihey, who’s still a builder and runs a protest group called National Workers Alliance in Melbourne, he was on with Graham on Offaly Offensive podcast, I heard. And hopefully they discuss a little about what it’s like to be a builder currently out there. Because I haven’t been in construction for a few years now and I’m not sure how the building situation actually looks with boots on the ground from that perspective. Hopefully they talk about it.

 

Joel Davis: So speaking of Matt, because obviously Matt took over the Melbourne wing of the March for Australia, and the next March for Australia he’s going to be heading up Melbourne again, I believe. There’s been some interesting developments in March for Australia world that I’m privy to.

 

What I’ve heard is that, and what I’ve seen, is that the Brisbane March for Australia people have now broken away. They’ve created their own website which is actually a couple months old, which indicates that this is premeditated, called Australiamarches.com or some shit like that! And they’re stealing the branding of March for Australia but at the same time separating themselves and saying:

 

“Oh, we’re not racist, and we’re not Nazis!”

 

And so on. And they’re trying to cuck everything out and they’re separated themselves from the rest of the March for Australia around the country. Because people who were paying attention would have noticed that in Brisbane, March for Australia turned into a bit of a cuck fest. Like in the first one, they had like some Indian guy give a song speech at a mass immigration rally. And then basically it just seems like the last one was just like all these politicians back to back to back giving speeches as like campaign pitches. And like the idea of March for Australia was supposed to be this like grassroots nationalist uprising against mass immigration. And in Brisbane they’ve kind of moderated the message:

 

“Oh, patriotism has nothing to do with racism!”

 

And here’s 3 [6] million speeches from politicians. And there was disputes. The national March for Australia team wanted to ban Gerard Rennick from giving a speech at the last one because he came out the week before the rally kind of with all these pro-immigration comments. We discussed it on the last stream, but he was allowed to speak anyway. He didn’t even mention immigration. There’s an anti-immigration rally. He didn’t even mention immigration because these organisers up in Brisbane have gone their own way.

 

And so that’s interesting because now that I guess there’s going to be a bit of a dispute between two different factions. The people in Sydney, the people in Melbourne, in other cities, are a lot more radical than the people up in Brisbane. It feels like in Brisbane there’s like this big conservative scene. Brisbane has become kind of the capital of conservatism in Australia. You know, like all the Right, the kind of smaller Right-wing parties are kind of based there, it seems, and they have CPAC there and it’s like the heartland of the Liberal Party and all of that. And there’s a lot of all White Boomers who moved up to Queensland and it’s a Whiter state, it’s an older state, it’s got a lot of conservative voters.

 

Whereas like in Sydney and Melbourne it’s gone Left-wing, there’s a lot of immigrants, there’s a lot of Lefties. But then the Right-wing is a lot more nationalist and a lot more radical. It’s kind of polarised. Whereas like in Brisbane it’s just like a conservative, you know, hug box.

 

[1:07:54]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s funny, is that things need to be worse, things need to be pretty bad before people stop trying to be the nice conservative guy and just accept the fight for what it is like I heard Elon Musk on Joe Rogan Show recently. There was a clip of him and he was saying that:

 

“There is no perfect way to do deportations. That if you’re seeking perfection, it won’t happen.”

 

What he means by that is if you’re trying to be nice about deportations because they were talking about how there’s a conspiracy within the Democrat Party in Australia [America] to bring in as many illegals as possible because then they then count those votes through some voter fraud system. And that’s how they’re trying to keep themselves in power or regain power in that country’s system. And Musk was saying that deporting illegals is basically the main priority of the Trump administration because that’s one of the ways they can prevent the Democrats from leveraging that whole corrupt system to gain power, the illegal immigration system.

 

But anyway, he was saying that if you’re going to try to be like morally good, to be the nice guy and perfect how deportations happen, it just won’t happen! You’ve just got to like literally grab people and remove them. You’ve got to be mean, you’ve got to be nasty. You’ve got to understand that this is like an attack on your country.

 

And there’s a similar situation with conservatives in Australia where no one’s willing to just “be mean”. No one’s willing to understand that this is a fight for our survival. Right. It’s like everyone’s still trying to be the nice guy:

 

“I don’t want to say anything mean. I don’t upset those people over there.”

 

And I suppose things are still that way in Brisbane because things just aren’t bad enough in Brisbane yet? Come down and stay in Melbourne for a couple of months and you’ll realise how concern like bullshit trying to be the nice guy is. You realise how much of a waste of time it is trying to not be racist and not upset those people over there. It’s just that time is done down here in Melbourne! It’s done in Sydney as well! But I suppose Brisbane still needs to arrive at that realisation.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s part of it. I think that’s part of it. But also what’s part of it, I think, is that the institutional strength of the Right-wing there is such that they’ve kind of hijacked things. Before the first March for Australia, there were people that were behind the scenes trying to get involved and they wanted to bring in people from the One Nation Party and bring in people from this Right-wing minor party and that Right-wing minor party. And that’s one of the reasons why the NSN stuck our nose in it because we were like:

 

“No, fuck off!”

 

Because we had to secure it from being kind of watered down and turned into, just like a campaign opportunity for all these politicians. It’s not about the politicians, it’s about the rest of us! It’s about the fact that the politicians have failed us. It’s about the fact that there are no good politicians. We’re trying to create a new generation that could provide an alternative.

 

But the establishment is complicit. Even the Right-wingers that are somewhat better are still complicit because they haven’t offered anywhere near enough of a resistance, a meaningful enough of a resistance. That’s why March for Australia came into existence because no one was, I guess other than us, was doing it! Was saying what needed to be said anyway.

 

Of course they saw the numbers swell and the opportunity to gain legitimacy and whatever. And so then they started jumping on it late. But then they said:

 

“Oh but if you want, we’ll bring in money so you can have security and big stages and good speakers and like a speaker system and everything. But in order to get our A list speakers to give speeches, we can’t have the Nazis there and we can we can’t say things this way and we can’t say things that way and everything has to be toned down.”

 

And they were all told:

 

“To get fucked!”

 

But the people who kind of played ball were the guys in Brisbane. The guys in Brisbane were the ones that played ball with those types. And now it’s basically been a conspiracy to usurp not just the March for Australia Brisbane, but I think they want to try and take the whole thing. They’re not going to be able to.

 

Blair Cottrell: Unfortunately for them it’s not speakers and better electrical equipment that’s spark political upheaval and even revolutionary politics. It’s personalities.

 

So I don’t think the Liberal Party can produce the personalities to actually keep the March for Australia going. But is it the Liberal Party that’s actually doing this? Are they behind that?

 

Joel Davis: I don’t think it’s a Liberal Party. I think it’s the conservative establishment, let’s say.

 

Blair Cottrell: Who is that? And is that like all the T-shirt salesmen?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, there’s a series of influencers. People that are associated, on the fringes of Sky News, people that are associated with all these different One Nation, these other political parties, the Andrew Hastie wing of the Liberal Party, that whole spectrum. The professional protesters who are always doing protests all the time, the well oiled machine protesters that every time there’s an issue they pop up and try and do, … The people that were doing the September 13, a lot of the people involved in that this is what I’m talking about. There’s a whole kind of like industry. It’s nowhere near as big as it is in America, thank God, but there’s an industry of like professional conservatism, let’s say, that’s not in the Liberal Party. It’s like outside it. And sometimes there’s a cross pollination with it. And it’s those people and, …

 

[1:13:29]

 

Blair Cottrell: They’ll kill it, won’t they? If they do get control of it.

 

Joel Davis: We’re not going to be able to win this by being nice. That’s what they wanted. They want to nice guy our way to it.

 

Blair Cottrell: They don’t want to win it, though. They probably don’t want to win it. They probably just want to get control of it, leverage it, milk it for all it’s worth, or whatever they can get from it until it dies. That’s it!

 

And it will die in their hands. Because they just don’t know how to handle that kind of like, they see it as a marketing opportunity. They see it as a way to make some money. They see it as a way to divert some votes here and there, and that’s it. And that’s what they’ll do. They’ll just milk it for that purpose. They won’t see the energy, they won’t see the potential. They won’t use that energy for anything truly revolutionary, truly meaningful, to create an upheaval, to create a counterculture, to build momentum for a great change, like for a great purpose, which is going to change politics somehow. It’s just like:

 

“All right, how can we make some money out of these people? How can we sort of divert their votes in a direction which is favourable to our sponsors? And then how can we just move on after that and wipe our hands clean of it?”

 

That will be the conservative approach, the merchant approach to the March for Australia.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the “Merch for Australia”. So Brisbane is going to turn into grifter slop garbage, unfortunately. But Sydney and Melbourne, I think Perth and the other cities should stay solid. So for this is for Australia Day, of course, the next one is on Australia Day [Jan 26, 2026]. And that I remember when the idea of doing the August 31st March came up. Part of what made me excited to do it was thinking two steps ahead. Not just that it in of itself would be a great day and that it would be a powerful expression of national sentiment and so on. But I was thinking if that is a success, then you can then leverage that to then call the patriots back out on Australia Day. Because of course, everyone remembers what happened last Australia Day. Last Australia Day, we did our march in Adelaide. We had our national conference in Adelaide, you know, at the beginning of the year. And we were mass arrested for trying to celebrate our national holiday.

 

Meanwhile, you know, every city in Australia has these huge Invasion Day communist-Aboriginal fuck Australia, fuck White people protests! And it’s just outrageous! It’s outrageous that our cities get overrun by that every year on our national holiday. And there’s no proper celebration of our national holiday that Australia is under attack.

 

Blair Cottrell: How is that not disfavorable to social cohesion? It’s like you guys are the only thing affecting or having any sort of negative effect on how people feel about the state of social cohesion in Australia. But having like, what are they, what are they? These rallies against like Australia Day Invasion Day protests with people holding signs saying Burn Australia Down:

 

“Oh, that’s all fine. No threat to social cohesion there. No need for special AFP task forces! No need to disrupt and dissuade those people from their activities. No need to talk about that at all!”

 

It’s only nationalism that’s a threat to Australia, apparently.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Like, so being anti-Australia is sweet, but being pro-Australia is the worst possible thing. That’s literally like we live in the inverted, … Obviously everyone watching this gets it. We live in the total inversion.

 

Blair Cottrell: Wish we could be a fly on the wall. Like watching certain task forces and police officers get briefed on like Right-wing groups, the sort of shit that they would get fed about Right-wing groups.

 

Joel Davis: I know what they get fed! Because I’ve been pulled over with Jack Eltis. I remember we got pulled over by the Raptor Squad. This was last year. And the Raptor Squad are like an anti-bikie task force, which is for the benefit of the audience. And they were just like, Jack was driving and they were giving Jack like tickets for not indicating left when exiting roundabouts and just trying to fuck with him, you know, stuff that like police never care about, that no one, like stupid laws on the books, technically that no one obeys. And I said:

 

“Qu do you feel good about yourself? I mean, this is fucking pathetic! You guys are fucking pathetic!”

 

And they said:

 

“Well, you guys are terrorists!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that what they said?

 

Joel Davis:

 

“What!”

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s because before they go out to disrupt and engage with you guys and whatever you’re doing, someone from the government or someone from police command briefs them and says:

 

“These guys are terrorists. They will stab you, they will kill you! So go hard on them!”

 

That’s what they will get told. And these rank, these cops, you know what do you call it? Rank and file cops, they would just gobble that up because they’re paid to gobble it up, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: So who is it, who is it that’s lying to police and calling a group of people engaging in political protest “terrorists”? Who’s doing that? Wouldn’t that be illegal? Oh, I forgot. We don’t have any actual standards or rules. We’re not a real democracy. So nothing’s really illegal, is it?

 

[1:18:37]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, if myself, I know this is true. Also, I remember I’ve been in the car driving home from night out with Jacob Hersant and they got his licence and put it into the system and they’re like:

 

“Oh!”

 

And one cop pointed to the other and said:

 

“Oh, Counter Terrorism watch!”

 

Like he’s on a counter terrorism watch list. What act of terrorism has Jacob Hersant committed? None! He just conveys his political views in public that offend people’s feelings and that’s “terrorism”.

 

But yeah, they brief the police that we, they literally have political police in this country as we have been discussing. We have political police in this country that are basically briefed on so-called Right-wing extremism, nationalism, as the greatest threat to our country. And that people like us say that it’s the immigrants that are a threat to the country and so on, when it actually is! Like people like us say the truth and then. But apparently we’re the threats for saying the truth!

 

But anyway, my point is that the Australian people know, the average Aussie knows that Australia Day is under attack and that it’s under attack because they’re under attack, because we’re under attack as a people. And they attack our day because they’re attacking the legitimacy of our whole country because they’re attacking us and our claim to this country.

 

And so if you look at the opinion polls, Australia Day has become more popular in recent years because people are feeling defiant. That’s what happens when you attack people existentially.

 

And so what I think is necessary spiritually for this country is for the cities to be just covered in Australian flags and patriots on Australia Day because then the media will say that it’s racist and that we’re all Nazis, … Some of us are Nazis. They’re going to put us all over the television. We’re going to be ready for it, but they’re going to make it all about that.

 

And then the average Australian is going to be sitting at home and says:

 

“Isn’t that what’s supposed to happen on Australia Day? Aren’t we supposed to celebrate Australia Day? Aren’t we Australia?”

 

Blair Cottrell: You know what’s funny is a lot of recently arrived immigrants are confused about that too. Like, when people who have just arrived in Australia, they hear about Australia Days happening soon, they sometimes, like, show up in a public place with Australian flags and stuff because they’re like:

 

“Wow, we’re citizens. I can’t believe we’re in Australia. We’re so happy to be here!”

 

And then there’s like White Leftists, like blonde people with Aboriginal T-shirts on, just throwing bricks at them and screaming:

 

“You fucking racist!”

 

Like, [chuckling] could you imagine how confused you would be?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but that’s the thing. Like, last year, they were able to make it look like we’re this fringe crazy group. And people got very emotional. They were like:

 

“Well they shouldn’t be getting arrested for celebrating Australia Day, singing Waltzing Matilda. That’s fucked up!”

 

And we knew they were going to arrest us and that we’d create that optics trap. But how edifying would it be to then fast forward one year and it’s just tens of thousands and it’s all over the country and it’s like:

 

“Arrest this! What are you going to do this time?”

 

Then Australians need to remind one another that we’re still here and that we haven’t given up yet and that has an intangible quality. Some people say:

 

“What’s the point of marching in the street?”

 

And so on. But it has an intangible quality. And this wouldn’t be a protest. This would be a celebration. And the Lefties, they’re already protesting us regardless of whether we show up or not. They do it every year. They’re the protesters. Let them be the protests. We can be the ones celebrating who we are on our national holiday.

 

And I think this Australia Day will be incredible! I think if you’re not marching for Australia Day this year, you’re a fake patriot. I mean, you just have to get out there because, … Yeah, you just have to! We have to take our cities back. It’s like a matter of honour. Do you agree? I presume you must agree.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, what am I agreeing with exactly? That people should fly the flag of their country proudly on Australia Day and celebrate Australia Day.

 

Joel Davis: But then we should march, like in the cities, like with March for Australia.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, the local governments used to facilitate those marches. I think it was cancelled during the pandemic. The Australia Day parades, the traditional ones, were cancelled during the Covid pandemic for health reasons, for your “safety”. Because it’s not like any evil is ever done in the name of your safety.

 

And then they were just never reinstated. So after like Covid just vanished overnight after everyone got vaccinated because that’s all they cared about was injecting everybody with the shit that ended up causing heart attacks that they never talked about. Once they got what they wanted in that regard, well, everything just went back to normal. And the marches, the Australia Day parades were never reinstated.

 

So we should just have our own parades. I guess, like everyone should just get out on the streets and march through the city organically. You don’t need the government to tell you it’s okay to do it. Just go and do it for your country.

 

[1:23:45]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’d be a fun day out. So I’m really looking forward to it. That was like, I’ve had this vision in my mind for some time,. So and I think it’d be powerful. And then we’re going to be doing our conference, our national conference that weekend and be launching, we’ll probably be launching the political party around then. I don’t know exactly when we’re going to do that, if we’re going to try and bundle it together or do it separately. We haven’t exactly decided on that timing. But you know, next year is going to be a big one for us and for nationalism and what a way to kick it off.

 

So anyway, because of all of that, and that’s a beautiful vision, great things to think about. Is really disappointing what’s happened in Brisbane. And I think it’s going to turn into a big drama and this is going to be like the animating kind of battle lines, I guess, of the next phase of where it’s going to be the containment Right, the remnants of the conservative establishment trying to rebrand themselves as anti-immigration populists, even though they’re not really that sincere about it and are just kind of grifting off it or trying to angle it for their narrow political purposes.

 

But it’s basically just maintaining “conservatism incorporated”, you know, maintaining the inertia of that whole structure of compromise and cowardice versus the re-emergence of real grassroots nationalism, trying to use that intergenerational energy, the energy of the White youth fueling the rise of a real nationalist movement. And the battle between these two forces and picking a side between these two forces is going to be the animating battle of the next few years. And like you can see that’s also kind of true, I think in not just in this situation but in America as well.

 

Like recent developments over there where I’m just seeing the old guard, … The difference I think between the Americans and us is that there’s more of a conservative establishment. So it’s like in America they’re fighting over control of the conservative establishment. Like nationalists are trying to like claim the conservative establishment and redirect it towards their ends.

 

Whereas in Australia the conservative establishment isn’t worth trying to like take over. Like it’s a joke! You should just push it over, just blow it up, get rid of it, replace it, beat it!

 

Blair Cottrell: By blow it up you don’t mean like actually blow it up, right?

 

Joel Davis: No, not literally planting bombs or something of that nature, but like, it’s a metaphor. But ASIO don’t care at this point that we’re not violent, that we’re not terrorists.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah apparently. You’re being treated as though you are anyway.

 

Joel Davis: So ASIO, stop with fucking us! Feds, stop fucking with us! We’re gonna try and take this in a political direction. We’re going to go away from the kind of more terroristic angle that you guys don’t like and we’re going to move into a peaceful political solution orientation. Allow us to do it! Because if you actually care about terrorism in the sense of you want to stop it, the only way that you’re going to stop it is by giving people with our views an outlet to express them within the system.

 

If you lock us out so that we can’t participate in the system, that’s how you’re going to create, … And ASIO said this themselves, like Mike Burgess* has said this himself, that he doesn’t expect us to commit terrorism. He expects some random guy who’s a nationalist, who gets black pilled, who thinks the movement has got no hope, goes off as a lone wolf and does some crazy shit! But they don’t even care about that. They’re not talking about terrorism anymore because they know they can’t make that stick on us. So now they’re just talking about what, …

 

[* Michael Paul Burgess is an Australian intelligence official, and the current Director-General of Security in charge of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO). Prior to his appointment to this role on 16 September 2019, Burgess was director-general of the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD). Burgess was born in England, and immigrated to Adelaide, South Australia in 1973 at the age of seven. He was the first member of his family to study in higher education, receiving a degree in electrical engineering from the South Australian Institute of Technology in 1988.]

 

Blair Cottrell: What happens when like literally everyone who ever supported NSN or White Australia ends up feeling that way. Because as soon as they tried to form a political party, the police just went even harder to disrupt them from doing that. And there was no chance of them actually having a voice or any representation. [chuckling] It’s like you guys when you were just hosting protests, making social media posts. Like two years ago, things weren’t that bad. I mean, you had some minor problems with police, but mostly it was just journalists giving you shit in the media.

 

But now you want to form a political party, you’re almost on the way to doing it, you’re making real progress. And now all of a sudden the whole Federal Police service is forming task forces and openly admitting that they’re going to do everything possible to “disrupt you from forming a political party”. It’s like they go even harder when you actually try to establish yourself or establish some sort of legitimate political representation.

 

So if I were an intelligence agent, I’d be sitting there scratching my head thinking:

 

“What’s the real problem here? Is it these guys trying to form a political party and obey the law? Or is it whoever’s in government mobilising the police into special task forces to harass, disrupt and set those guys up on bullshit charges for trying to form a political party? Maybe we need to look a little deeper into the actual system. Maybe the system’s the problem!”

 

Joel Davis: This is an interesting, … So meanwhile, while they’re treating us as the problem, is this:

 

“ASIO boss Mike Burgess warns of realistic possibility foreign government could attempt to kill a dissident in Australia.”

 

This article came out today.

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s that in relation to? What foreign government?

 

Joel Davis: I’ll read it out:

 

“Delivering the 2025 Lowy Lecture on Tuesday, he said, ‘this threat is real. We believe there are at least three nations willing and capable of conducting lethal targeting. It is entirely possible the regimes would try to hide their involvement by hiring criminal cutouts, as Iran did when directing its arson attack’.”

 

So he’s still pushing this nonsense that Iran was behind the synagogue arson attacks when obviously it was the fucking jews!

 

[1:30:09]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s weird! It’s like, why would Iran do that? What benefit is there for Iran?

 

Joel Davis: There is no benefit.

 

Blair Cottrell: It could very possibly be someone acting through Iran to make it look like it’s Iran.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the jews! We know that Israel have penetrated Iran because when they had their war earlier this year, Mossad were conducting targeted assassinations inside Tehran of their top political and military officials. So it shows that Mossad have guys on the inside, that they’ve fully penetrated the Iranian system and establishment and so on.

 

So they could easily make, they could easily pay, you know, gangs here to do fire-bombings of synagogues and then make it look like they were Iranian or something. What a load of garbage!

 

But yeah, paying organised crime. So it came out, Mark Latham brought this up as well recently that he asked the, I think the police commissioner in New South Wales about, because they have something called Strike Force Pearl, which is their anti-semitism special task force or something. And he said:

 

“Of all the arrests they made in response to anti-semitic, you know, arson attacks and graffiti incidents and whatever, how many were organised crime?”

 

And they said:

 

“All of them!”

 

All of them were organised crime.

 

So it’s not anti-semites doing it. Someone’s paying, you know, biker gangs and shit to do it. Why? Why would they be doing that? Well, what was the net result? The net result? Did any jews get hurt? No.

 

So it wasn’t to get the jews. The net result was to basically provide a context, a pretext for the jewish lobby and its satellites in the media and Sky News. What does Mark Latham call it? “Sky jews”. And instead of the Daily Telegraph, he says the “Daily Tel Aviv”. For the jewish media and the jewish lobby to pressure successfully the government into passing Hate Speech laws.

 

So obviously it was the fucking jews that paid the gangsters. I mean, one plus one equals two.

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe they know that, maybe ASIO knows that. But they’re publicly running with the “oh, Iran did it”, to make Israel think they’re not on to them. I mean, that’s a long shot.

 

But what they say publicly doesn’t always need to line up with what they actually know. They’re an intelligence agency, so they could be playing a long game.

 

Joel Davis: This is interesting. In this article, it’s supposed to be about foreign governments attempting to kill dissidents. And you were just talking about how you think they could try to kill me potentially, if I get too successful. Or you, or our friends. What he says here:

 

“Angry, alienated individuals are embracing anti-authority ideologies and conspiracy theories, engaging in uncivil debate and unpeaceful protest.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Where’s that happen?

 

Joel Davis:

 

“The aggrieved, not necessarily espouse violent views. It may see violence as a legitimate way to affect political societal change. The way nationalist and racist violent extremists attempted to leverage the so-called March for Australia rallies is a case in point. The biggest neo-Nazi group, the National Socialist Network, or White Australia as it is rebranding itself, identified the demonstrations as a vehicle to raise its profile. It strategically and opportunistically exploited the organisers complaints about immigration and the cost of living. Even if the organisation does not engage in terrorism, I remain deeply concerned by its hateful, divisive rhetoric and increasingly violent propaganda?”

 

What do you mean violent propaganda?

 

Blair Cottrell: Hang on, did Burgess say that specifically?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah!:

 

“And the growing likelihood these things will prompt spontaneous violence, particularly in response to perceived provocation.”

 

So what this is saying:

 

“We might upset people who will then attack us, and that this is therefore irresponsible.”

 

What a joke!

 

Blair Cottrell: So he’s actually referencing members of Australian nationalism or specifically White Australia as potential targets for assassination. Is that what he’s saying?

 

Joel Davis: I haven’t seen those explicit comments here, but I’m still reading:

 

“While nationalist and racist violent extremists make up the significant majority of our investigations into ideologically motivated extremism.”

 

So still the majority of ASIO’s work is on us. I mean, it’s crazy to think about how many people working in these federal agencies are just focused on the boys, like literally us!

 

Blair Cottrell: Fucking crazy! Especially when you see the boys and like you know them. They’re literally just normal guys.

 

Joel Davis: Like they’re watching right now! There’s like feds watch, like they watch every episode of this shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, they have to.

 

Joel Davis: Like you’re fucking pathetic! Hi feds! Fuck you! Ike, what a joke.

 

Blair Cottrell: When he said, when Burgess said that White Australia or you guys utilise concerns about immigration to exploit or gain your profile or whatever as a political force. Doesn’t literally every fucking political group or party that ever existed do the same thing?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, One Nation is trying to exploit it for themselves. The Liberal Party tries to exploit it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Massive realisation, bro! Like literally that’s what politics is. You leverage an environment and situation to your advantage. Like as long as it’s not violent, it’s legal. But that’s changing right now, isn’t it?

 

Joel Davis: If people attack us and we fight back. And he says:

 

“Oh, they’re provoking violence.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s very concerning.

 

Anyway, continue.

 

Joel Davis: Since, oh, he’s just going on about fucking October [7th] 2023, anti-Israel, blah, blah, blah. All he cares about is people doing nationalism or being anti-Israel. It’s just like political policing. Like the positions of the state is that:

 

“White people bad, jews good! And we want to enforce that.”

 

That’s all he’s saying, basically.

 

[1:36:26]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: I think the days are almost gone, where you can sit on streams like this and talk like we’re talking now, I don’t think this will be possible in another year or two. Maybe even sooner than that. I think the world we grew up in where you can just observe how ridiculous the government is or how unjustly you’re being treated by government agencies, by police, and you can just openly discuss that or draw attention to it. I almost think those days are gone. We’re almost done with that.

 

Like, you’ll be streaming like this and they’ll just come into your house and smash your camera and arrest you over some like. [chuckling] I actually believe that we’re going to go through a time like that pretty soon. I feel it in my gut. Yeah, we’re almost done with this. This will be a thing of the past pretty soon.

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know. I think it’s a bit much. I don’t think.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think you’ll be surprised. Australia is very corrupt.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it is corrupt. It is corrupt, but I don’t think they have the ability to do that.

 

But anyway, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, they’re already raiding people on no evidence. Like they’re just coming into your house and saying:

 

“Oh, you did this!”

 

They don’t have any fucking proof. And they’re just using that as an excuse to take all your shit! So they’re doing it already.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, it’s not really the same thing though, is it? Because you don’t, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, it’s only one step away. Like, it’s basically within the same tier.

 

Joel Davis: That’s like, they use the, “the process is the punishment” type thing, but they are not actually succeeding in getting the punishment in those scenarios. I mean, Tom just represented himself from a jail cell over zoom in court and won the other day.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but he’s still in jail.

 

Joel Davis: Well, he’s in jail for running up a hill and hitting people. Like, it’s, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Partly. It’s like 25 other charges as well.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I mean, obviously what’s happening to him is unfair, but it’s like I push back against this, like catastrophizing:

 

“Oh, they’re just gonna round us all up and put us in jail anytime now.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, if you look at what’s happening, like if you just observe the pattern of their activity, what they do is when they don’t get a result by going or by increasing their activity in regards to like taking a more aggressive approach. When they don’t get the result they want by taking a more aggressive approach, they just become more aggressive again to try to get a result. And if that doesn’t work, then they just get more aggressive again. That’s the pattern of behaviour I’m seeing from the current political policing government system. So based on that pattern, it’s just mathematical certainty that they’re just going to become more aggressive.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but at the end of the day, like they don’t have the ability to just arrest, …

 

Blair Cottrell: They do have that.

 

Joel Davis: They still have to win in court. You’ll win in court and then you make them look stupid. Like there’s a limit., …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I agree. That can take years. But then it depends on how compromised the judges are as well. So there’s still variables there to consider.

 

And like they really do have the ability, they have the ability to do whatever they want. There’s just words on paper that they need to manipulate to make it seem legit.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, there’s legitimacy though. Like if they push too hard, particularly as we’re building this political party, if they push too hard against us, you know, it will be too delegitimizing. So they have, …

 

Blair Cottrell: There is that. But then you can argue that they’ll just make it exclusively about you and your ideology, and they’ll get everyone to agree on those terms. So it can’t happen to anyone else, but it can happen to these Nazis because of “how abhorrent they are”. And everyone will be like, “yes”! In Parliament. I think they made a law. Do you know who Julian Knight is? He was that guy who shot a bunch of police officers. Maybe Huddle Street Massacre, Was it Huddle Street?

 

Anyway, he’s in jail and he was eligible for parole a while ago. Did he get parole recently? I can’t remember. Maybe he did, maybe he didn’t. But Parliament made a law specifically to keep him in jail because he was considered such a villain of society, specifically to keep him in jail. So reason I’m telling you that is because though they can just try to make laws specifically to stop you guys registering exclusively, and they’ll claim that that’s, …

 

Joel Davis: Like, if they want to try and do that. And then I’m happy to go to the High Court. We’ll win. I’m pretty confident, like, it’s unconstitutional.

 

Blair Cottrell: I hope. So yeah.

 

Joel Davis: And then it will just be like, good publicity.

 

Blair Cottrell: And I’m not being. I’m not taking a black pill here. Like, if you just look at the pattern of behaviour, like I said, of the Australian government and policing system, this is what they’re gonna do, I reckon. Because they just get more and more aggressive, more and more.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, they’re playing games.

 

But the problem that they have is the police try to go further than what the laws actually allow them to. They’re getting ahead of themselves. They’re not going about it with the Right progression. It’s not the policy, …

 

[1:41:29]

 

Blair Cottrell: Where’s the incentive for them not to do that, though? Because they do that and then there’s no punishment. There’s no drawback for them. The charges against you that didn’t hold up in court and that took a year for you to sort of clear your name of two years. Well, you still have to go through all of that process and then the charges just get dropped or you get found not guilty or whatever. And then there’s no actual consequence for the police for taking two years of your life.

 

Joel Davis: There aren’t any consequence for me either. I got a bunch of court dates I have to call into, and I got held in a jail cell for a few hours. Like, I don’t give a fuck! Like, it doesn’t really change anything for me.

 

Blair Cottrell: So I just think there should be an immediate and pretty severe consequence for police, for the prosecution department, if they lay charges on you that end up just getting dropped or you found not guilty. You shouldn’t have to go through like a second lawsuit process that takes another two fucking years and costs another $40,000 to try to get like some sort of justice against malicious prosecution. It should just be like some sort of immediate consequence. Like the prosecutor who signed off on the bullshit charge should just get sacked straight away! Maybe his whole team, something like that.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I agree with that, but that’s not gonna, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Especially when we have a system where there’s no real punishment for just being malicious as a prosecutor or as a police officer. You can just do it and then later, oh the judge finds that this isn’t legit, so throws it out and then the cops just goes home laughing anyway. Because he’s still robbed you of all that time and energy and money!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but that’s what happens. It’s just like this circle jerk where we just get jerked around. Obviously there’s an exception when it comes to. When they allege, like, an assault or something that’s separate. But when it comes to these speech crimes and political machinations, it’s just this. It’s just this big, like, jerk around that then ultimately doesn’t actually result in very serious punishments, or if there’s even a conviction.

 

So it’s like, I just don’t really care that much. And you kind of let it. That’s the thing. That’s why I do find it annoying the catastrophizing, because that’s like, part of what it is. It’s like to create fear so that people think:

 

“Oh, well, like, we can’t do anything because the police stop us.”

 

And it’s like:

 

“Okay, but they haven’t stopped us yet. They haven’t actually stopped us.”

 

And so it shows that if they could just stop us so easily, they would have by now. But they can’t. Like, there’s limitations on what they can do, and we’re skirting on the edge. But they don’t have the ability to just like an easy, like, snap us in half option because they would have taken it by now.

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re trying to create one. The limitations are changing fast.

 

Joel Davis: They’re trying to.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what we’re observing right now!

 

Joel Davis: They haven’t actually come up with a formula on how to do it yet. They haven’t figured out how to do it. They’ve got all these think tanks and lobby groups and they’ve passed all these different laws and they do all these meetings and have all the, … And they still haven’t fucking done it yet.

 

So to me, that demonstrates something. You know, you got to take stock of that you have been around for a while. Tom’s been around for a while. Like this isn’t like something that just popped up in the last year that they’re dealing with. They haven’t figured out how to deal with it. All they’ve done is kind of amplify us and make us more famous. They haven’t figured out the method. And using like policing tactics to deal with something like this is the wrong way. If they wanted to beat us, the way you beat us is by creating a fake opposition movement that basically is kind of nationalist, but it’s still controlled by them. And you bring all the people that would otherwise support us into that alternative. But they can’t do that they don’t have the skills to do that and they don’t have the personnel to do that. And they don’t have the ability to concede that because they’re so ideologically fixated that even like the ZOG version of us, they would be still too offended by it, to allow it to exist.

 

So yeah, I think we should do some Superchats. Unless you can respond to that, but we could do some Superchats.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, it sounds like a good idea. It’s been a good discussion. Pretty intense talking points and topics. But it’s an intense environment down here in Australia right now, isn’t it?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah it is.

 

But yeah, Sign up to the party! Sign up to the fucking party! Like seriously. Mr. Marshwood said:

 

“What’s your take on the mischling* question?”

 

Well, I don’t even know what you mean by the mischling question. Like, yeah, do I agree with the Nuremberg Laws? Maybe they’re a little bit too lenient I would say.

 

[* Mischling was a pejorative legal term which was used in NS Germany to denote persons of mixed “Aryan” and “non-Aryan”, such as Jewish, ancestry as they were classified by the Nuremberg racial laws of 1935. In German, the word has the general denotation of ‘hybrid’, ‘mongrel’, or ‘half-breed’. Outside its use in official Nazi terminology, the term Mischlingskinder was later used to refer to war babies born to non-White soldiers and German mothers in the aftermath of World War II. Wikipedia]

 

But you know, from what I’ve seen like an Ashkenazi jew is like 70% White, 30% Levantine.

 

So if someone is like, so the Germans, if you’re between 1/2 and 1/8 jewish, you’d be classified as a Mischling, which meant that you weren’t classified as a full jew. Or you could stay in Germany but you couldn’t like work in like government or the media or any like sensitive position.

 

But if you were like 1/8 jewish or less, then you could be considered like a full German and you could do most things other than join the SS which had like 100% blood purity requirements. So like, is that what you’re asking? Like, I mean, I’m not going to criticise it. At the time it was probably a reasonable law. I would probably go about things a little bit differently today. And because the primary issue isn’t really like jewish mixing, it’s like other non-Whites who are, if jews are like mostly White with some admixture when they mix in, it’s a bit different than if someone’s like Asian or black or something because it’s more of a genetic divergence. So you have to be way more strict. Hazel Mango said:

 

“Why did you move to Sydney, Joel?”

 

I don’t really want to get into all the details of my personal life, but I’m from Sydney, so I kind of just like moved back. Oz88 said:

 

“Are there niggers in heaven?”

 

No! What do you think, Blair? Are there niggers in heaven?

 

[1:48:05]

 

Blair Cottrell: Are there black people in heaven? I’m sure there’s been some noble black people who have done some noble stuff. I think it’s pretty dismissive to say, …

 

Joel Davis: I’d say they’re not going to the same place we’re going.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, I don’t know, man! I don’t know. Do you believe in heaven, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: Not really, no. But like let’s say you did. Like let’s just say like for argument’s sake, like we’re on board with that. Do you think? Are we going to be, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, considering that, …

 

Joel Davis: Like what’s up my nigger?

 

Blair Cottrell: Like considering that like having that racial admixture creates an earthly hell, I can’t imagine the most ideal, it’s not really living conditions, like an afterlife, the most pristine existence would be multi-ethnic. It’s probably going to be very orderly and homogeneous, you would think.

 

But some people believe that heaven is like your own version of perfect. It’s like a perfect time in your past that you envision. You just kind of keep living in that.

 

What would your version of heaven be? What would you like, do you want? Are you like one of those 72 virgins kind of guys? Or do you have like, …

 

Joel Davis: No, I’m not a fucking Muslim. No, I think that’s a meme idea. I mean I like the notion of Valhalla where it’s just like basically you just fight all day and then pretty much until everyone dies. And then you like respawn, have a big piss up, party all night and then wake up the next morning and fight the death again.

 

And then you like respawn, have a party and it just goes like that forever. That sounds pretty cool to me. It’s like playing video games. I was thinking you can just play like GTA like IRL every day with your mates. Like imagine if we could kill each other. But you don’t have to feel bad because like you’ll see me tomorrow. Like just respawn, like be funny as fuck! I’ll kill you all the time.

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re like laughing about it. You’re like, bro, your skull exploded yesterday! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. [chuckling] But yeah. Do you have a dream of niggers? Because personally, in my dreams, everyone’s always White. I’m not just saying that to be edgy.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s a good point, actually. Well, I’ve never really had a close relationship with anyone who’s black. And so there’s not really effective, like memory data of interacting with someone who’s black.

 

So I suppose I don’t dream about it because there’s nothing for my brain to draw upon. Because I tend to dream about scenarios that I have experienced. But then there’s all this extra stuff like expansion content bolted on and it turns into something different. I’m sure if I knew a black guy that I probably would dream on occasion about a black guy, but I just, …

 

Joel Davis: You don’t dream about niggers! That’s!

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, do you?

 

Joel Davis: No!

 

Blair Cottrell: Why are we being asked these questions? What are these questions? Is this Superchats?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Tollah the Gotcha Joel bro:

 

“When’s your next debate? Get it done. That wog faggot on TikTok who dodged you is a coward! Who else is on the horizon apart from Avi and others?”

 

I don’t know. I don’t really have. I mean, everyone. I don’t know. I got to change my approach because it seems like when I try to debate people, I must be intimidating them. I must be coming on too strong. And they keep running away. In the debate world. I’m like the, desperate incel, who the girl replies to my text and then I spam her with like 45 texts about how she’s the one.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, [chuckling] you got to control that man!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I gotta play hard to get.

 

Blair Cottrell: Too keen. This young axe is too keen. That’s his problem.

 

Joel Davis: Treat ‘em mean, keep ‘em keen. Or something. But it’s like the opposite. I’m like, too mean!

 

[1:52:24]

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[2:45:15]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 11/9/2025 = 43, latest comments at top)

PongTheBoy
9 hours ago
you fuckinf idiots are single handedly destroying the end immigration movement your gay little marches don’t do anything but scare normies and empower the left and j’s.. fuck both of you retards hopefully you get locked up so us with a brain are able to take over the movement
0 likes

AndrewGalvin
1 day ago
What’s been up with Blair recently, it’s like he has no vril and spirit anymore. He started playing video games on stream and doesn’t seem to care as much.
3 likes

AndrewGalvin
1 day ago
Can we get Jacob on
1 like

CH484D_60Y1M
1 day ago
PATRIOTS organize – DIGITAL ID! TEXAS! Show of force as a protest is a must, Urgent Constitutionally legal show of force, armed assembly ! https://rumble.com/v71d4ei-patriots-organize-digital-id-texas-show-of-force-is-a-must.html
1 like

AussiePermaculture
1 day ago
My intuition is telling me things are going to get really good unexpectedly.
1 like

TheShowgun
VerifiedSupporter+
2 days ago
Literally laughed very loudly at Blair’s complete ignorance of JD Vance
0 likes

okkkkkk4
2 days ago
Best podcast in the world. Free tom. Blair says things that may happen and Joel says why they won’t lol
0 likes

ProvingNihil
2 days ago
Nice Joy Division shirt Joel!
1 like

jonottawa
2 days ago
It’s time to cut Blair loose. Every answer, every take, sets off alarm bells. Watch through the show again and tell me I’m wrong. He’s either a fed or his heart is no longer in it.
-1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
HeronNow
Supporter+
13 hours ago
YOU’RE WRONG
0 likes

Girnigoe
2 days ago
I don’t think Blair is ever being negative. Someone must play ‘devil’s advocate. As to what ZOG will do to you, look what they’ve done to everyone else who has opposed them. Get a Ouija Board and ask Julius Stretcher or Alfred Rosenberg.
2 likes

Restlessdreams88
3 days ago
Basic joy division shirt
1 like

imSofaKingRayZest
3 days ago
just a few important points for the white australia parties policies off the top of my head, ending australias un treaties is a must at the start as it legally underpins most of the un-australian laws in place, lima declaration, who health policies, climate change mandates, etc. free speech is also a must, as a org commented to truth, lies can always be defeated by truth, the holocost could never be pushed if truth was honored. a comprehensive policy on technology and its use is also essential with the neural/social distortion capacity, coming dominance of ai and agi and the robotic transition. a massive re education program for both women and men toward a more natural order.
1 like

imSofaKingRayZest
3 days ago
afp have the power to legally hack into your devices and plant illegal material on it then raid you and charge you for having said material. think about that for 58 seconds while another non white immigrant legally becomes australian, cobber.
0 likes

imSofaKingRayZest
3 days ago
so abbos calling for “their” land back and an end of australia or importing infinity turd world filth is not seen as racially divisive or threatening social cohesion but white aussies wanting a white australia like it used to be is when we are all suppose to be equal?
0 likes

Keane55
VerifiedSupporter
3 days ago
Also important to remember that Winston Churchill was responsible for the Galipolli disaster, of which the ANZACs were a massive percentage of the casualties.
0 likes

palacepony
Supporter
3 days ago
Yeah this DISRUPT LAW shit.. where is the line drawn here? Rape your wife? Kill your dog? Burn your car? Blair is great to expose the frailty of these stooges and their ‘disrupt law’.
1 like

BradC1988
3 days ago
The WAR film is fucking epic and inspirational. AUSTRALIA FOR THE WHITE MAN! THE REST MUST GO!
1 like

Bolzenschleuder
3 days ago
Joel serving up some sweet emo aesthetics tonight
0 likes

Seanybruv
4 days ago
2:22:00 slurs only exist for inferior people and inferior things. It’s why there are no proper slurs for White people, at least none that actually work in the same way they do for other races.
0 likes

SALAustNZ
4 days ago
No. There are no groups in heaven.
1 like

Seanybruv
4 days ago
I can’t believe you didn’t talk about the White Australia Rising documentary. I see it’s been taken off youtube already, it’s criminally underviewed on Rumble
1 like

Scovell7
Supporter
4 days ago
Blair’s blackpilling seems to increase with each episode. It really contrasts with what appears to be the mood of the NSN at the moment.
6 likes

› Show 2 replies
3010phil
4 days ago
They should look at how many from the AFD party in Germany have recently died . Way too many for coincidence
4 likes

fdgrdfg
4 days ago
1:25:50 Blair’s response was goated ahaha
0 likes

DJTriumph
Supporter
4 days ago
If there was a White Britain Party I would vote for the first time in my life
4 likes

TripleGas
VerifiedSupporter
4 days ago
Erika Kirk (née Frantze) is a yenta.
3 likes

TripleGas
VerifiedSupporter
4 days ago
this whole “nigggers are going to heaven” shit is so fucking retarded and is always pushed by fedora fags and Satanists as some kind of own. They don’t even believe in heaven but try concern troll Christians. Pathetic bunch they are.
-2 likes

AltKuyperian
Supporter+
4 days ago
Sad I keep missing these. Show is over before I get out of bed in the morning lol
3 likes

Dissident_Loner
Supporter
4 days ago
I had hoped that Blair would go off on an uplifting rant and he didn’t disappoint.
2 likes

LachlanMD
4 days ago
these ads before the show are getting ridiculous
7 likes

‹ Hide 5 replies
Seanybruv
4 days ago
watch on Brave browser, no ads
6 likes

MajesticCasual
4 days ago
Brave browser, or Adblock Plug in on FireFox, etc I probably haven’t seen an ad since 2008 or so. Ads become obsolete and why on YoudenTube they have people manually read ads.
1 like

AltKuyperian
Supporter+
4 days ago
Unfortunately, it’s due to the large presence of easily fooled boomers on the app.
0 likes

BradC1988
3 days ago
Brave browser solved that problem for me
0 likes

Strueth
3 days ago
p l l
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Strueth
2 days ago
oops sorry,, I had my phone in my pocket gardening and just noticed this weird pocket message…
0 likes

katana17
5 days ago
[Joel Davis – NSN Conference Speech – Aug 10, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/11/03/joel-davis-nsn-conference-speech-aug-10-2025-transcript/ [In this speech given at a National Socialism Network conference in August 2025, Aussie nationalist activist Joel Davis talks on “Why Individualism is Cowardice”, and how to be effective Whites need to see politics as a team sport, just like our enemies, organized jewry and other groups, and work together. Key points: Organisational strength and media coverage: “This whole weekend has been such an upgrade for the organisation… They think making us look strong is going to go against us.” Critique of individualist accusations: “These Nazis they can’t get a girlfriend, they’re poor, they’re a bunch of losers… And so they have to blame the jews, blame the system, blame society for their ills.” Political sacrifice as responsibility: “To engage in this form of politics requires incredible sacrifice. We are the ones that are taking personal responsibility for the future of Our nation.” Politics as inherently collective: “There is no such thing as individualism in politics because politics, by definition is how you organise a society.” Criticism of conservative withdrawal: “What these people actually are advocating for is for you to exit political life, for you to not participate in political life, to become apolitical.” Learning from Left-wing tactics: “The Left make the personal political… The reason why your life sucks is because of White supremacy, is because of Patriarchy… And the way that we’re going to fix it is we’re going to go and create a political movement.” Movement costs and commitment: “This movement exacts costs… If you participate in our movement, you get a lot of enemies… They’re trying to put us in jail.” Racial politics as team sport: “Politics is a team sport… We have to play as a team, as White people, if we want to win!” And more, ….
1 like

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live. It is The Joel and Blair Show this evening, but at the moment it’s just the Joel show because Blair is having a couple of technical difficulties which is getting sorted now, so he’ll be joining us soon.

 

But yeah, it’s just the Joel show so far. But the past week has been quite something. I think the national rallies on 31st of August was something truly incredible! There was, by my math, over 100,000 patriots marching across Australia with their Australian flags against mass immigration. We haven’t seen anything on that scale in Australia in a very long time. And it’s completely changed the perception, it’s completely changed the conversation. It is now being accepted by a larger and larger swathe of society that nationalism is a serious political force in this country, a force that many thought was dead, many thought was long gone. Well, they were wrong! Nationalism is back and it’s back in a big way!

 

Today is the 7th of September [2025] and yeah, the world saw scenes of Australian patriots marching in every city of Australia, filling up the streets. And these were rallies which were explicitly nationalist coded. They were explicitly pro-White, they were explicitly pro-Australian. They demanded an end to mass immigration. There were speeches given across the country, some by members of the National Socialist Network, including myself, and also some by other figures and across the board. The speeches given at the rally were not just immigration restrictionists, but nationalist in tone. The Zionists were kept out, the conservatives were kept out. There were no foreign flags except for a few annoying people with Aboriginal flags that were humiliated by the crowd. And what we saw was a proper nationalist mass mobilisation, the first of many to come, I hope. And it was quite something, it was quite special.

 

So, yeah, I was just very emboldened to see it. I was expecting it. I was expecting it to be what it was, but to see it actually materialise, to look back, because I was at the front of the march in Sydney, to look back down the street and just see an endless sea of patriots all the way back was quite the spectacle. And there’s a lot to break down, obviously, events all over the country.

 

But then if that wasn’t enough drama, if that wasn’t enough cinema, I mean, what happened in Melbourne was something else. I was in Sydney, but in Melbourne, the NSN literally had to fight their way through Antifa all day to get into the march. In a video that I’m sure you’ve all seen now of the NSN bashing the fuck out of Antifa to get themselves into the march.

 

But then also at the front of the march because there was a series of blockades that were set up on the march route by Leftists, by communists, that the NSN literally had to bash their way through to ensure the march to get to its destination. Then they get to Parliament. They set everything up. They have some brilliant speeches. Thomas Sewell gives an excellent speech with the theme fundamentally that we have to end mass immigration so that we can again become a nation, that Australia is no longer really a nation, that Australia has become this multicultural multiracial soup that’s lost its identity. And this was the assertion of the White Australian patriots that we’re not going to give up our country without a fight! Incredible scenes.

 

Then on their way back from the rally, the boys encountered the Antifa that had been fighting all day who were continuing to harass and attack patriots that were on their way home from the march, going back to their cars and so on. There were actually two patriots, you know, draped in Aussie flags that this horde of communists went down and punched on with and attempted to beat up. And the boys heard about this and where the boys actually parked when they arrived happened to be right near the Antifa staging ground, which was the so-called “Camp Sovereignty”, which is an illegal loitering encampment of communists and Aboriginal activists asserting some kind of Aboriginal ownership over the land or some garbage like this. Now I believe that the people that the NSN fought with at Camp Sovereignty, they were not actually the standard abos that just hang out there. The people that they fought with were random Antifa agitators who they’d been fighting with all day, the same crowd.

 

And so they confronted them. Another fight ensued, another flawless NSN victory ensued. The footage was then portrayed in the media like as if the NSN just went up there and started bashing abos for no reason, which is false. And then many arrests were made, including of Thomas Sewell, the leader of the organisation, who was subsequently denied bail. You know, kind of ridiculous, with a ridiculous reasoning. Because in Victoria you pretty much get bail for anything. They give bail to murderers, they give pet bail to manslaughters, they give bail to people who do home invasions, to people who have machete fights. You can do basically anything in Melbourne and get bail. For them to deny Thomas Sewell bail was egregious miscarriage of justice. He is currently in a jail cell.

 

The feeling in the leadership of the organisation is that we are going to try and do everything we can to get Thomas back out on bail and we will pursue legal avenues once more evidence has been collected to pursue that end. But considering the political bias in the court system, that is not necessarily super likely to be successful. It has a chance of success, but it’s not super likely to be successful.

 

And so as a result, we could be looking at a year, two years without Thomas Sewell. Well in public, he might be in a jail cell for a long period of time.

 

Also, the charges against him are quite serious. Many accounts of assault, violent disorder, other charges. You know, he’s probably going to have to do a shift in jail. So that’s just the reality of the situation. It sucks, but that’s where we’re at.

 

I see Blair is now ready.

 

Hello, Blair. You’ve arrived.

 

[07:12]

 

Blair Cottrell: Hey, guys, I’m testing this little microphone thing I have. Can everyone hear me? You can hear me okay?

 

Joel Davis: Yep, can hear you fine.

 

Blair Cottrell: Let me just double check. The audio is coming through, test. Yes, it is. Thank you for having me and thanks for being patient.

 

I’m in a position right now where I’m not set up the way I would usually be, so I’m not running with my usual setup. I was listening to what you were saying, though, and, man, those marches, let me start off by saying, were much bigger than I expected. Huge numbers! Blew my expectations out of the water in every state! What do you think, Joel? Were you expecting that many people? Were you surprised?

 

Joel Davis: It was exactly what I was expecting. I said tens of thousands in the major cities and according to media reports, 15 to 20,000 in Sydney, which felt about right. I would say 20,000. In Melbourne, it looked like just as many. In Adelaide, media reported 15,000. There were big reports in Brisbane and Perth, I think of a similar size. Then there were small rallies in Hobart and Canberra, in Townsville and lots of other towns. Which is why I estimated that the total national turnout was over 100,000 people, which for a grassroots anti-immigration rally that is promoted through social media over the space of a month to turn out over 100,000 people, it shows that the mood of the country is hungry for the return of nationalism and that a new nationalist movement is about to be born in Australia with a serious mass movement.

 

Blair Cottrell: People are definitely unhappy. Yeah, I just breathed in some water when I drank it.

 

But, yeah, people are definitely unhappy. People are definitely unhappy. The march seemed like a success. Do you feel it was a success? Like, do you feel that there was more gained than what was lost?

 

Joel Davis: It was an incredible success. In every conceivable metric, I think. What aspect of it could not be considered a success?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, Thomas Sewell going to jail.

 

Joel Davis: Yes, that. I guess that obviously is a setback, but frankly, the impetus for that was a brawl that occurred after the march was over.

 

So I don’t know if we can chalk that up to being the march. Obviously it was related, but I don’t think that takes away from the march. I think that the march spoke for itself. I think a lot of lessons were learnt. There was a lot of discussion in the lead up to the march:

 

“Oh, well, if the Nazis are there, then the media is going to decry it as a Nazi rally and no one will want to show up and no one will support the rally!”

 

Well, that was shown completely false!

 

First of all, I’ve noticed absolute radio silence from the jews all week. The jews did not attack this rally! The jews have barely spoken about the fact that Nazis were on the stage giving speeches in every major city at this rally other than Brisbane. The jews have completely kept their mouth shut about this rally because incredibly, they’ve shown the sense that it would be a really bad look for them because obviously a lot of the clashes between counter-protesters and patriots, they were between communists and patriots. But the communists obviously stylised themselves in the pro-Palestinian garb. And so there’s this kind of Palestine versus Aussies optic that obviously the jews don’t want to undermine.

 

And so the jews have kept kind of silent about it, even though Nazis and anti-semites were all over this rally, which was quite something. Not all jews have kept their mouth shut, but generally speaking, they’ve been quite quiet.

 

Also the prime minister who came out in the days before the rally pre-emptively condemning it, saying that White supremacists and Nazis were involved and so on. What he then said after the rally was:

 

“Oh, well, there was many of the people, there were good people, and the Nazis just hijacked it.”

 

So he completely changed his tune. Why did he do that? Because the prime minister of this country fears more the normalisation of National Socialism and our organisation than he does mass dissatisfaction with mass immigration, which is mass dissatisfaction with his leadership.

 

One thing that would unite every single person at that rally would be a hatred of Anthony Albanese, the prime minister.

 

And so for him to say that, completely turns everything everyone was saying on its head because they were all saying:

 

“Well, if you guys show up, they’ll call everyone Nazis!”

 

Well, what happened was the opposite. There was this scrambling by not just conservatives where you might expect it, but by Leftists, even. Mainstream Leftists in the mainstream media to distance the rally from the Nazis. And that was quite something to observe.

 

Secondarily, I would say the response of the conservatives was quite interesting, because a lot of conservatives did not want to touch this rally with a ten foot pole. They were afraid to weigh in, they were afraid to back it.

 

And then after they saw it was a massive success, then they tried to all pretend like they supported it the whole time and defend the rally. We saw Sky News basically defending the rally, Liberal Party politicians defending the rally and so on. And what this showed is that it doesn’t actually matter if the Nazis are involved. It doesn’t actually matter how supposedly “bad” the optics of the rally are.

 

[13:10]

 

At the end of the day, the people are still going to come out and they’re going to march against mass immigration and the system will still have to respond to those concerns as legitimate because of the sheer numbers and quantity. And when we do another one of these, the Nazis will be there again and the turnout will be excellent again. And the people will be glad that we are there. Like they were already glad that we were there. When we marched in Sydney with the boys in formation in Black bloc, the crowd literally gave us an ovation as we marched in the NSN was like applauded by the crowd at the beginning of the rally. There’s vision in Melbourne from the boys getting high fives and cheers and so on as they march into the crowd as well.

 

And a lot of the people that went to the rally in Melbourne saw the violence from the Left and loved to see the fact that there were some men willing to stand up and fight to ensure the rally was successful. There were reports in Melbourne that there were fat bitches on megaphones basically cucking out, saying:

 

“No, the Left have blocked off the rally, we have to turn around and go back.”

 

Well, no one listened to them because the National Socialists were at the front beating through the communists to ensure the rally could get to its destination.

 

And then when Thomas Sewell gave his speech at Parliament to a crowd of tens of thousands of patriots, he justified our presence, saying:

 

“I know not everyone here might be as radical as usual, but you need the fighters at the front and we are the fighters. When the Palestinians and the communists came to try and attack us and take the Aussie flags, it was us who fought through them!”

 

And the crowd erupted into enervation [?]. They absolutely loved it when he said that because they saw it with their own two eyes that that was real.

 

And so it was a massive victory, I think, for the NSN, because what it showed was that when push comes to shove, when the patriots need to mobilise, we will be there to facilitate it. And we facilitated it around the country. We did a lot of work behind the scenes to push Zionists, cuckservatives and so on out of this rally, who wanted to water it down, who wanted to turn it into a civic nationalist rally, who wanted to turn it into:

 

“Oh, we’re not racist, we love everyone, blah blah, blah!”

 

Just deprive it of all of its meaning and all of its direction. And we helped ensure that the rally went ahead as planned. And this is our message to Australian patriots. We’re on your side. We will help as best as we can to facilitate your dissatisfaction with immigration because this is our number one issue. There is nothing we care about more than preserving the White majority in Australia. That is literally priority one of our organisation! And we will do everything in our power to physically, politically and so on, protect patriots who want to stand with us against mass immigration, stand for continuing to have a nation, continuing to have Australia for the Australians.

 

And so I think it was a massive success for our organisation to show as a proof of concept the positive role that we can play and that a lot of the naysayers that their concerns were unfounded. And also it was a great show of force from the Australian people that they are willing to turn out in serious numbers on this issue. And I think it could get bigger from here.

 

I mean, there’s talk of another one soon. I know that it’s going to be redone on Australia Day and that could be the big one! I think the turnout on Australia Day could be quite special. And we need to take back our cities from these Aboriginal communist invasion Day, you know, “Fuck Australia” marches that go on in the middle of our cities every Australia Day. It’s ridiculous!

 

Australian patriots should run our cities and should through an expression of national pride on our national holiday. That should be what Australia’s cities look like on Australia Day is a sea of Aussie flags and patriots celebrating together.

 

But it’s going to probably be a fight. We’re going to need people to turn out in serious numbers to take the cities back, because the official Australia Day parades have all been shut down. And last year on Australia Day in Adelaide, we were all arrested for the crime supposedly of waving Aussie flags and celebrating Australia Day with pride. But this year it’s not going to be 60 or 70 of us. It’s going to be thousands and thousands and thousands of us in every city taking our cities back! And I think that could be glorious and that could be historic because that could be really the day where the tide turns in Australian politics.

 

Blair Cottrell: The march for Australia definitely would have just been Israeli flags and explanations from the speakers about why they’re not racist without the presence of White Australia. Are you guys going by the name White Australia now or are you still NSN? How do you address the organisation?

 

[17:56]

 

Joel Davis: Our organisation’s name is White Australia. The NSN is the activist vanguard of White Australia.

 

So you can go to White Australia.org, you can sign up to be a registered supporter. We’d love for you to sign up as a registered political supporter of White Australia to help us register our political party. And so White Australia is the umbrella organisation. The NSN is specifically the street activism wing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why do you think Melbourne, out of all the march locations, why do you think Melbourne was the most violent?

 

Joel Davis: Well, two reasons. One, Melbourne is by far the largest concentration of communists in Australia. So they had the most communists in the streets.

 

And also Victoria police are the most incompetent police force in Australia by a country mile. Victoria police completely abdicated their responsibility to maintain public order on the day. They allowed communists to set up blockades. They allowed communists to get right up to the march and attack the march. I saw in some of the footage that you put out of your experience on the day in Melbourne that there were confrontations between massive groups of communists and patriots with like literally not a copper in sight.

 

I don’t think New South Wales police, they’re just simply too competent at this stage anyway for that to happen. And I think there’s two reasons for that. One, Victoria police lost all their best guys because they tried to make them take jabs and tried to get them to shoot anti-Covid protesters with rubber bullets. And all their best guys left Victoria police because they refused to be complicit in such a corrupt institution, number one.

 

And number two, they’ve replaced them with Indians and women and people that can’t do anything when it comes to crowd control, anything serious. And second of all, it’s the fact that there’s no permit system in Melbourne because in Melbourne everyone has the right to protest at any time.

 

And so in other states there was a permit that the march for Australia organisers secured that facilitated a particular route that they had the Right to. And the police basically kept counter-protesters away from that area, more or less well, in the other cities from what I’ve heard. I know they did so in Sydney. I didn’t even see counter-protesters in Sydney. I know they were there, I saw footage of them. But, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Have you noticed the function of a counter-protest is essentially illegal? They make it look like it’s not. They say they’re going to occupy your space. If everyone has the right to protest. And how are counter-protests legal? Oh, because you’re protesting a protest, but you’re actually trying to stop somebody else from having their right to protest.

 

So how does that make any sense? And you’re trying to do it with physical intimidation, and where possible, violence, but for some reason it’s still legal. The only aim a counter-protester can have is unethical and potentially violent.

 

So why is it legal? What do you think? Should counter-protesting be illegal?

 

Joel Davis: No, I don’t think it should be illegal. I mean I’ve conducted counter-protests before, such as with the boys, such as the Fuck Off We’re Full rallies, which I thought were excellent!

 

But obviously when it’s like a big march and the police are notified well in advance, there’s going to be thousands and thousands of people that are going to march on this route. There was a police liaison for the Melbourne organisation that informed the police what the route was going to be. And the Left made it very clear what they wanted to do. And what they wanted to do was, … And we had intelligence from inside their camp that they wanted to literally physically block the rally. People like purple pingers, that communist piece of shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: They would have been successful too, if it wasn’t for the presence of Tom and the guys down here in Melbourne.

 

Joel Davis: Absolutely!

 

Blair Cottrell: I didn’t actually personally see any of the fights or clashes between Tom’s guys and the Leftists. But later when I was reviewing footage from other sources, I noticed that the entire march for Australia was Spearheaded by Tom’s group. And it would have been blocked by lines of aggressive communists who had all sorts of weird weapons or using things as weapons, by the way, like cans of fruit. They were throwing eggs at people. They were throwing petrol. One guy got doused with petrol. I saw that on your channel, actually.

 

Long story short, without Tom and the guys down here in Melbourne, I can say the march, it would, it wouldn’t have gone the way it did. It would have probably got stuck somewhere down near Flinders Street and it really would have been difficult to march anywhere. It just would have been a contained event. We never would have got to Parliament House, and the whole thing would have been declared a victory for the communists.

 

So yeah, it was definitely notable that Tom and his guys fought to defend the march and its original purpose.

 

Joel Davis: That’s the thing. The Left modus operandi in Victoria has been to use violence. And this has been true for decades. When the One Nation Party in the late 90s tried to set up branches in Melbourne, the people who came to attend their branch meetings, many of them were elderly women and so on. They were pelted with tinned food, bricks, hit with crowbars, punched in the face, in the back of the head and so on, by masked communist thugs. This also occurred. I know you know this from experience in the Reclaim Australia Days, back in the 2010s. In Melbourne, communists have been using violence to basically stop nationalists from organising for a very long time. They’ve also used it against us when they’ve come down to NSN rallies, such as the Stop Immigration rally that the NSN held at Parliament House in 2023. They threw tinned food, they threw eggs, like all the same shit that they were doing to this they did then! And the police just stood there and allowed them to do it. Didn’t make one arrest! I think only when a Leftist threw a tin at a cop, then he was arrested for it. But like you can throw them carte blanche at nationalists apparently who were then pepper sprayed by police and so on. The police facilitate Left-wing violence against nationalists in Melbourne. They have for decades. This is nothing new. And again on the weekend.

 

Jacinta Allan and the Labor government in Victoria is full of communists!

 

[24:43]

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that right? Do you think the police command are given specific instructions not to bother Leftist counter-protesters too much and to focus on, …

 

Joel Davis: Victorian police are an ideological institution. I know from dealing with them when they rammed their way into my house or dealing with them in the courts with the organisation, defending charges. Different members of the organisation. I have sat in many courtrooms or called into many courtrooms to listen to the proceedings. Victoria police, and this was true again in Tom’s bail hearing. Victoria police justified their actions against us on the basis that our political ideology is “bad” and that the community needs to be protected from nationalists.

 

So Victoria police are a totally captured institution. They fly trans flags, gay flags and so on at the front of their buildings. They are not a politically neutral organisation. And they have an entire department which is basically dedicated to politically policing the nationalist movement.

 

We’ve seen so much footage and so many reports of people who were not in the NSN, people who were just regular patriots, grandmas, grandpas. There was that one bit of footage of this old man getting bashed by like a horde of communists, he was hospitalised with broken ribs. The communists feel that they’re justified to go out there and beat the shit out of patriots simply because they love their country. And the footage is put all over the media, all over the Internet. The police see the footage and they make no arrests. The communists literally have a free pass to be violent!

 

Blair Cottrell: You know why that is, right? Like, you know why? Like, what’s the dogma that’s motivating this? It is that we are White people, all descendants of evil colonial devils! And that’s not just what Leftists think. That is the dogma of the society that we live in. And there’s three different categories. Every society needs its villains. Under Christendom, you had this kind of spiritual effigy of the devil, right? But it’s no longer a fundamentally Christian society. It’s more secular now.

 

So the villain has become a specific race, responsible for all historical woes and suffering. White people! There’s three different categories of villain as well, right? If you’re White, you’re automatically bad, you’re ethnically bad, your ancestors committed all these atrocities, colonialism, war, blah, blah, blah, slavery.

 

But you can atone for your sins and become an honorary member of the diverse system. You can even become part of the nobility if you disavow your own ethnic heritage. If you basically self abnegate:

 

“You hate your own race? Good! You’re in the club! You become an honorary member of the multiculturalism.”

 

But if you start noticing things or calling out the dogma as bullshit, you’re a racist, right? But if you start actually fighting against the system that’s imposing that dogma, you’re a Nazi!

 

So it’s very simplistic ideological subversion, and it’s kind of sick and twisted. But that is literally the society we live in the reason people are throwing cans of fruit at people’s heads on the street, the reason some people, White people, want to kill other White people is because they’ve been exposed to systemic dogma that makes them believe White people are bad, and need to be punished for historical sins, the sins of their ethnic ancestors! And it’s going to continue while this dogma is still being taught in education system, is still part of the administrative society, part of the society that we’re raised in.

 

So until that changes at a fundamental level, you’re going to have not just White people, but everybody else uniting against White people. Why does every society need its villain? Everyone needs to blame someone. No one likes to take responsibility for their own bullshit! Everyone has to blame someone else.

 

And it’s very important for a society’s power structure to have everyone united against the common enemy!

 

And like I said, because we’re not a religious society anymore, we’re secular. The enemy has to be of the material plane. It has to be a specific race. And it’s us! We are the designated villain of society. So it’s going to continue, it’s going to get worse. It’s kind of creepy actually. And I’ll get into this a bit more as I think about it more.

 

But it’s curious, isn’t it? Because even if you’re watching this, if you’re like of the Leftist opinions and you’re watching me explain this to you now, you still won’t get it! You’ll still think I’m just a racist Nazi and I should be killed or put in jail, because you’re that conditioned by the dogma. Realistically, I’m just a person. I’m a person who believes in just telling the truth as I see it, and that’s it. But you’ll never see me that way. Because of my ethnic heritage and because I’m actually critical of the dogma that you’ve come to love so much and trust so much because you’re so smart for learning it at higher education system. Right?

 

You couldn’t possibly be wrong. You couldn’t possibly have been tricked. You’re too smart for that. You’re too clever. That’s what they told you anyway.

 

But yeah, what do you think? I’ve got one more question for you actually. Another question for you. Did you already touch a little bit on the camp sovereignty that Tom and the guys?

 

[30:10]

 

 

Joel Davis: I did a bit, but we can discuss it because obviously a lot of arrests have been made. I believe seven members of the NSN, don’t quote me on that, have been charged. The police indicate more will be charged. So we’ll see how many of the boys cop charges. You know, the media is portraying it as they ran up the hill to beat up innocent Aboriginals that were sitting around.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ll be honest. That’s what it looks like. That’s what it looks like on camera. It looks really bad! It looks like Tom and his guys were the aggressors and they attacked people who weren’t doing anything. They were sitting there. And it’s not really important when you got video evidence like that going before the court, what happened, what was said, rumours, what might have been seen by someone, it’s all hearsay. It only matters what is provable.

 

Basically, what is assessed in court, the way determinations are made in court, as you know, Joel, isn’t the truth! It’s what things look like! It’s what the judge decides is true based on what is provable and the evidence.

 

So do you think, personally, I think if they didn’t attack the camp, I think he probably still would have got charged for a couple of things. But every other fight that I saw taking place between Tom’s guys and the Leftists, they had clear aggressors that were fighting them as well. So they had defense there, they had legal defense. It’s all on camera, and they’ve got defense.

 

If they didn’t attack the camp, I don’t think they’d be copying as much flak. I don’t think Tom would be in jail right now.

 

So do you think it was a tactical error to charge on the camp like that?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I think the benefit of doing so versus the cost is definitely not worth it. I think having Tom in prison for any period of time, but particularly a long period of time, is obviously not in our interests as an organisation. Of course not.

 

However, I was in Sydney. If I was in Melbourne, and I had just been fighting communists all day with the boys. And then I heard reports that these communists were camping, you know, up that hill and beating up patriots, gang bashing patriots on the way back to their car. And we had to go back to our cars, which were covered in graffiti because these patriots went down, identified cars that [belonged to] people that were attending the march and keyed the fuck out of their cars, spray painted “Nazi” all over them and kicked in the windows and shit like that!

 

And then you look up the hill and they’re up the hill and they’re throwing shit down at you and fucking yelling shit out. And it’s those same that you’ve been fighting all day that have been doing heinous things, beating up old people throwing projectiles at you. Some reports of throwing vomit, throwing shit! Throwing piss, like water balloons filled with piss, dousing people with petrol, all kinds of shit you’ve seen and dealt with throughout the day.

 

And then you see those cunts up on that hill, I can understand the impulse entirely to run up the hill and beat the shit out of them. And I probably would have, not probably, I definitely would have done it too! If I was there, I’d probably be in jail right now too. Or maybe I’d be on charges and be released on bail because I don’t have all the priors that Tom had.

 

But yeah, I completely understand why that happened. From a moral standpoint, it was 100% justified. 100% justified!

 

However, from a tactical standpoint, doesn’t look like the best move. But I can’t, you can’t judge. Like if you imagine yourself in the situation that they were in, if you’re a red blooded White man, you would have done the same thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Any man who sees that footage of the boys running up a hill screaming like the last charge of Gondor in Lord of the Rings or something, everyone I showed that to laughed! It’s amusing, it’s funny! It’s like:

 

“Oh my God, this is happening in the city between different political factions. This is crazy!”

 

But as I said, or what I was alluding to, is if you’re going to get strategic, which you need to do in politics, obviously you can’t just be governed entirely by impulse. Like the aggressive general. You need to know when not to fight. You need to know when to fight and when not to fight. And how to fight as well. You’ve got to remember too, that everyone’s got a video camera attached to their hand these days with their smartphones. Everyone’s filming everything all the time. It’s a really gay system we live in. It’s really fucking gay and annoying, but you kind of got to adjust to some degree.

 

Look, half the reason I have been close to the organisation is because I care about Tom. He’s my friend. Everyone knows I love Tom. I’ve got a long history with Tom. And I was trying to guide him best I could. I was, just by giving him advice. I still enjoy commentary, obviously. I enjoy analysis and putting together my videos on politics. But I wanted to try to keep Tom out of prison, because Tom is a no bullshit kind of guy. He’s a fighter, he’s a warrior! I admire him for that. But it was my intent to try to keep him out of jail, to try to make sure something like this didn’t happen. And it looks like I failed to do that. I did my best. But at the end of the day he was going to do whatever he was going to do. I’m just glad that his guys, …

 

Joel Davis: It was awesome! Like the Tom Sewell mythos ultimately just took insane W’s! Like there’s all this footage now of Thomas, so bashing communists and pulling the Bane pose and holding the Aboriginal flag, and yeah, he might do a little bit of time, but he’s going to get out! And when he gets out, we’re going to have the party built. The movement is going to be even more advanced. We’re going to have even bigger membership. A fully fledged political party operating. And his folk hero status was cemented, I think, over the weekend. Like Tom Sewell’s name was trending in America. It was on the news in Canada, it was on the news in Britain.

 

And then the whole epic-ness of the day of the speech to the 20,000, …

 

[36:58]

 

[Joel’s sound cut out for several minutes without him realizing it. When doing these shows they should have a written sign always handy, saying “you’re muted”, or similar, that they can hold up.]

 

[40:15]

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you hear me? Joel? If you can hear me, can you give me a thumbs up?

 

Joel Davis: How long was I gone? Did you lose me for a bit?

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you hear me? Can you hear me? Can you hear what I’m saying?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Test, test, test.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I can hear you. How long was that?

 

Blair Cottrell: I can’t hear what you’re saying.

 

Joel Davis: How long was that?

 

Blair Cottrell: If you can hear me, Thumbs up.

 

Joel Davis: I can hear you.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, you can hear me. Okay, thanks. Well, my audio is just shit itself! I can’t hear what you’re saying. I’ll say this quickly and then I’ll buzz off to try to fix my speaker.

 

Regarding Tom staying in remand and possibly even getting some pretty harsh sentencing when his charges do go to sentencing. There’s a few things to consider here because the judge can actually use what’s called “public denunciation, deterrence or racial motivation or racially motivated”, purposes behind his offences to essentially ignore mitigating factors like his military service, his work ethic, his family, and give him the maximum possible sentence for the charges. Public denunciation is basically, it’s a form of deterrence. It’s like for the public to see:

 

“Look, don’t do what this guy did, or this will happen to you!”

 

And they can do that. The law, if it’s a serious enough matter, they feel it’s a serious enough matter. Deterrence is like, on an individual level for him. Don’t do this again. Or this is what’s going to happen to you where we’re going to give you a harsh sentence. So you learn. And then the racial motivation thing.

 

And like I said, any one of those things can be used to give us especially harsh sentence. So he’s going to need some really good lawyers, he’s going to need some good legal advice and people to do some diligent work for him. Preferably, in my opinion, people who aren’t so emotionally invested necessarily in our side of politics, the right side of politics, or not so ideologically motivated. Just good, cold, logical lawyers that are going to crunch all the numbers and do all the magic.

 

Because what is law, at the end of the day, it’s symbols on paper. It’s words on paper that justify the government kidnapping you and making an example out of you if you’re not doing what they want you to do. But you need people who are good at putting really nice and intelligent words on paper. You need people good with that symbology bullshit to work their magic to try to make sure Tom doesn’t end up in jail for the next five years.

 

But I’m just gonna fix my audio. I can’t hear what you’re saying. I don’t fucking know why I don’t have my usual setup.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: So I’ll be back.

 

[Blair leaves]

 

[42:56]

 

Joel Davis: All right. So Blair’s audio shit itself just as my microphone fucked out. And I was cooking too, though. That’s really annoying. People are texting me saying it was like five minutes, “no audio” or something.

 

And anyway, I’m gonna go from the top. I’ll try and reprise what I was saying. What I was saying was this.

 

Number one, the people that are complaining that:

 

“Maybe Tom maybe made an incorrect strategic decision charging up that hill.”

 

What they’re complaining about is the fact that Thomas Sewell is a real nigger!

 

The reason why we are going to have, why we have the world’s most interesting and dynamic far-Right movement, while we have the most relevant Nazis in the 21st century in Australia, is because Tom Sewell doesn’t do what’s pragmatic. Tom Sewell lives, eats, breathes and shits blood and honour! And that’s why people love him! That’s why he is able to lead a movement that is as cool and dynamic and powerful as the one that we have.

 

So you can’t have your cake and eat it too. You can’t, on the one hand, be celebrating all of the excellent things that Tom does or the NSN does or White Australia does. And then on the other hand, be like:

 

“But, well, actually this was the incorrect strategic decision.”

 

It was the honourable decision. It was the moral decision.

 

[44:32]

 

 

And at the end of the day, the mythos of Thomas Sewell took a huge W! [win] What is Tom Sewell’s rap sheet going to be? Bashing a black security guard at Channel Nine! Bashing communists! Bashing Aboriginal activists! This is fucking awesome! If you’re going to have a rap sheet, if you’re going to go to jail, doing awesome shit! And he’s going to get out of jail. Maybe it’ll be one year, maybe it’ll be two years in the worst case scenario. But he’s going to get out of jail and we will have the political party built, we will keep recruiting, the movement will be bigger, be stronger, it’ll have more manpower. And he has solidified his status as a folk hero of Australia and as one of, if not the most leading voices in the struggle for White survival on the planet!

 

Thomas Sewell was trending in America. He was on the news in Canada! Like this is a truly global story. And the whole narrative arc of him and the boys beating their way through communists and then giving an epic speech at the front of Parliament to 20,000 patriots. And then the next day he like runs into Jacinta Allan [Victorian State Premier] and like hijacks a press conference and so on. I mean, it was incredible stuff! It was absolute cinema! The entire country was glued to this story, this incredible story!

 

So yeah, this is like the stuff of folklore, this is the stuff of legend. And this is the type of leader that we should have in this country. We should have an actual warrior, someone who beats the shit out of communists. We shouldn’t have a faggot like Anthony Albanese or Sussan Ley in a pantsuit, pushing just like cliches around!

 

We want a real red blooded human being. The way that he portrayed himself, the way that he conducted himself. That is what a leader is supposed to be that is a warrior! The king is supposed to be a warrior. The king is not supposed to be a corrupt nerd who sells his arse and his values for a cheque. A pragmatic:

 

“Well, I got to do this to keep this person happy and shake hands with this person.”

 

And that’s not the kind of leader that I want. I want a leader who puts their heart on their sleeves and who lives and dies for what they believe. A fighter for this country. That’s who should be leading.

 

So the mythos of Thomas Sewell just took an incredible W, [win] and the whole arc of going to jail and so on. Hitler went to jail, so many other political leaders went to jail, came out of it, and still had political success. Many of the Bolshevik Revolutionaries did time in jail, did time in exile. So many great leaders throughout history were exiled or jailed or what have you. That isn’t going to stop him, and it isn’t going to stop us. So what Tom made was a decision that was based in honour.

 

And in my experience, even if it doesn’t seem pragmatic, ultimately, the honourable decision always will end up being vindicated in time. Because that’s what the Aryan race is! What Aryan means is literally the honourable race. Like the root “arya” means honourable. It means noble. We are the noble race.

 

So that’s how we should behave. We take the fight to the enemy.

 

So, yeah, that’s kind of what you see a lot of naysayers as well, about this whole thing:

 

“Oh, well, you know what’s the point of marching around?”

 

That march completely changed the collective psyche of Australia. That march completely changed the global perception of Australia. It made people believe that nationalism could re-emerge in Australia as a political force. It made people believe that White Australians are not going to surrender this country without a fight. That is intangible. Right? You can’t quantify that you can’t get an Excel spreadsheet that represents exactly how that translates into, like, political metrics. Right?

 

But you know it! If you’re an Australian, you know it, you can feel it. You just experienced it. It felt like a reset of Australian politics.

 

I see Blair is back. Can you hear me this time?

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you hear me?

 

Joel Davis: I can hear you. Can you hear me?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I think we’re back on. Really sorry about this, guys. I get really frustrated when we can’t just make basic technology work properly. It makes us look like idiots. [chuckling] What was I going to say? What were you saying just then? Do you need to finish a point?

 

Joel Davis: Well, we can move on to the next point. You missed my whole take on the Sewell situation, but it doesn’t. We’re going to keep the stream rolling. I’m not going to repeat it again. I said it once without the audio on. Again without you. So we won’t go over it again.

 

We should move to the next subject, which I wanted to cover, which was that people say:

 

“What’s the point of marching in the street? What’s the big deal? Okay? You had people marching all over Australia. Who cares?”

 

And what I was saying was that politics, you can’t always capture it all in a quantifiable metric. That what that march communicated to the Australian people was that this country is not being given up without a fight, that nationalism is still a force in Australian society. And that the idea that we’re just going to have this slow march into more and more Leftism and more and more multiculturalism. There’s nothing you can do about it. That march was a signal and a shot into the collective psyche that no, actually there is a choice, actually there could be a resistance and emboldens people to have a fighting spirit.

 

It emboldens people to embrace a more nationalist set of values and ideals and in their lives because they can see that they’re not alone. A lot of people don’t even allow themselves to think nationalist thoughts or think racist thoughts because they think that the conversation’s over and that it’s a lost cause. And what a march like that communicates to them in their hind brain in the kind of psycho-social dynamic of Australia, is that:

 

“No! It’s not a lost cause!”

 

Do you agree with that?

 

[51:10]

 

Blair Cottrell: I do, but there needs to be somewhere for them to go. You can’t just march in the street perpetually and not have an actual tangible solution. I know that you guys want to register a political party, but that needs to happen and it needs to happen really soon! Especially because of the situation in Australia. I’ll explain what I mean in a moment. But you guys need some basic legal protections and I think you’ll get that if you get registered as a party. They’re going to try to stop you from registering though, because I think they’ve got like AI models and experts and stuff that try to run certain scenarios through a point of assessment or series of assessments to determine how likely it is that a White Australia party could get votes.

 

And I think they know that it would get votes. And they’re going to try to shut you down. And it’s creepy what’s happening in Australia right now! It’s almost not safe for dissidents to live in this country at the moment. And it’s only going to get worse over the next one to two years, the next couple of years in Australia for leading dissidents who are trying to create organisation and solutions, somewhere for people to go, someone for people to vote for. It’s a dangerous place to live if you’re someone like that, for three reasons.

 

The first reason is because you remember the Welcome to Country ceremony at the Anzac Day memorial service or the Shrine of Remembrance in Melbourne, where some people booed that they voiced their protest against that. Now that’s a political statement. When a guy is performing the Aboriginal Welcome to Country, he’s doing that for political reasons. It’s a social political statement.

 

Now people in the crowd voiced their disagreement with that some of them were members of NSN or White Australia, and some other people joined in too. And even former soldiers actually understood why the Aboriginal thing was booed. But at least one person has just been charged with three criminal offences for booing! For voicing his disagreement just by booing of a government sponsored political statement at an Anzac Day War Memorial service. He’s been charged with three criminal offences.

 

Joel Davis: Nanthan Bull.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yes! That means he was charged for voicing his opinion, basically.

 

The second creepy thing that makes living in Australia really kind of weird and creepy right now is people are being raided on no evidence. Dozens of Australian Federal police joined by Counter Terrorism police, I think they are. They’re raiding people on no evidence for things they know those people haven’t done just to take their stuff!

 

I know because they did it to me just two months ago. Still haven’t got my stuff back. They reckon I did a Nazi salute. They know I didn’t do a Nazi salute! They know that I don’t do Nazi salutes! I don’t really go for the whole German, the copy paste German, National Socialism thing. It’s not my style, never has been. And they know that they would have intelligence on that, but they just raided me on the accusation anyway and they didn’t have any evidence! And this is creepy because there’s only one. Ics of you’re going to raid people on no evidence for what you know they didn’t do, that’s only one step away from just fabricating evidence, from just making shit up to throwing them in jail or ruin their life!

 

[Blair’s image frozen]

 

Joel Davis: Is he frozen for you guys too, or just me? Chat? Is Blair frozen? Put a F for frozen in the chat, if Blair’s frozen. Yep.

 

All right, it’s over. Well, I’ll interrupt Blair’s black pill rant. Yeah, I think ZOG had enough of the black pilling. I see the chat is full of F’s. We’ll see if he comes back. Hopefully he’ll be back soon.

 

But yeah, I think I take a different view. Like, yes, they’re trying to lay charges on us for speech crimes and things like this, but these are all very minor charges. They don’t carry serious sentences or they have limited prospects of success in court, they de-legitimize the system and create sympathy for our guys and for our movement. And this really shouldn’t deter people from getting involved in the movement.

 

Number one, they generally target people in leadership, prominent public facing activists. And number two, what’s the alternative to joining a movement like ours? Like just standing by and watch our country be stolen, be flooded with Indians and Chinese? Where it’s an irrevocable situation where we completely lose control of the continent forever. Fuck that! I’ve already made my peace with the fact that at some point, if we have enough success as a party, eventually someone might just come shoot me in the head! I don’t give a fuck! I’ll just respawn! Like I don’t care! Because what’s the alternative? I’m not just gonna just sit there like a cuck watching goy flicks and jerking my shit while Indians and niggers and fucking Muslims and shit are flooded into the country and there’s no Australia anymore, and it’s over. Fuck that. I’m not gonna stand by and allow that to happen, as you can all clearly see, and neither should you!

 

[56:47]

 

And if you would, fuck you! Like, you’re literally the reason why the White race is in decline, because of your refusal to engage in collective political action in defense of our race. And it’s not even that bad. Like I’m having a lot of fun being a political dissident. A lot of my friends are National Socialist or nationalist political dissidents. They’re having a good time! It’s actually a fun way to live. Like, I’m so sick of black pilling and:

 

“Oh, but this, but that and whatever!”

 

Who fucking cares! You know what? Non-Whites are flooding into the country by the hundreds of thousands! And now is the time to resist! Now is the time to get organised. Here is the movement. We are at the beginning phase of the movement to fight back, to take our country back. Where the fuck are you? Why the fuck haven’t you joined yet? There is literally zero excuses. We must fight or we will perish as a nation! Period!

 

I don’t care about the black pills. I really don’t. I don’t care about the, “but what?” It’s just pathetic! We don’t have time for that. What we need to focus on is how are we going to get more organised. How are we going to build up the collective resistance of the White Australian nation to resist our genocide! That’s what we need to focus upon and that’s all that matters.

 

And you know what? I remember discussing this on the show before. There is over one million White millionaires in Australia. There is more than 1 million White millionaires. I know a million dollars isn’t really, that much money anymore. But the point that I’m making is that there is plenty of resources out there in the White community. There is almost, 20 million White men and women in this country. Yes. Some of them are Lefties, and some of them are Boomers. Whatever. I mean, Boomers can still help. Boomers can still vote. Boomers have a lot of money that they can throw in. There’s a place for Boomers.

 

But a lot of them might be lost causes ideologically or what have you, but there are millions and millions of people that are going to be positively predisposed to White nationalism in this country, that if we organise just even a small percentage of them, we could build a political movement that could rival every other political movement in this country and then some. So we can win! It’s just a matter of willpower and a willingness to struggle and a willingness to sacrifice.

 

You know that I see Blair’s back. There was a gentleman in our organisation who is a dentist, who earns very good money as a dentist, he’s a friend of mine who was doxed by the enemy, by jewish journalists, and by Antifa. And they’re going about trying to destroy his career right now.

 

And, I mean, obviously that’s a setback for him on a personal level, but he doesn’t care, because he understands, like, ultimately he doesn’t care if that’s the sacrifice he has to make, because ultimately, saving our nation is what matters! And there’s plenty of people in our movement who have made incredible sacrifices, who have been attacked, who have had to go through trials and tribulations, have been incarcerated, have been charged and will do time in prison and so on. That’s the only way that we’re going to fucking win!

 

We’re actually not going to be capable of winning with a strategy which takes no risks, in which no one has to make any sacrifices, in which no one has to do any time in prison, no one has to pay any money, no one has to lose a job, no one has to lose a girlfriend, no one has to be estranged from their family. That’s not the story! That’s not the hero arc. The hero arc is trials and tribulation!

 

[Joel’s sound cut out]

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel, is your. Is that your microphone or mine? I suddenly just can’t hear you anymore.

 

Joel Davis: Am I back?

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re back now? Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Was it for long? Was it a short mute this time?

 

Blair Cottrell: I was like, 10 minutes, bro! You have to start again! No, I’m kidding! It was only, like, 10 seconds.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. What I was saying was that that’s the hero’s journey. The hero’s journey. You have to go through trials and tribulations. You have to suffer! You have to make sacrifices in order to develop the character, to become worthy of being the champion, of being the victim, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I agree.

 

Joel Davis: We’re all on the hero’s journey together. Everyone participating in this movement, we all must suffer. All my sacrifice! And we all must accept it valiantly and forthrightly.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I get it, but., …

 

Joel Davis: No one is making more sacrifices than the leadership. We got Tom willing to go to prison for the movement, and go to prison gladly. I mean, obviously not glad to be in prison, but he’s willing to do that if that’s what’s necessary, because there is going to be no victory without casualties. There’s going to be no victory without suffering, no victory without struggle.

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel, is it necessary? Was it necessary? That’s my question.

 

Sure, it’s like what you’re saying, I understand it. But at the same time, you don’t want to hand yourself over on a platter to the police prosecution and make it easy for them. So was it necessary for Tom to go to jail after this march? Was it necessary to attack the camp? I don’t think it was at this point.

 

[1:02:12]

 

 

Joel Davis: Well, attack I don’t see it as an attack. I see it as them defending themselves against communist agitators who were throwing projectiles at them and threatening them.

 

But nevertheless, whether it was necessary or not, is besides the point. What it was honourable, and what it was awesome! And it should be defended on that basis.

 

And moreover, it adds to, as I was saying before, the mythos of Thomas Sewell. The man, the myth, the legend, the folklore! I mean, it’s legendary stuff. This will go down in the history books on the arc of the rise and fall of Tom Sewell, the ups and downs and so on will be the fights with the communists and the street brawls and so on, which help demonstrate his authenticity to the fighters of Australia. This man is a fighter! This man takes the fight to the enemy on your behalf. Follow him! That’s powerful!

 

What are these faggots in the Liberal Party? Who are they fighting? No one! They’re just a bunch of cucks. Or in the One Nation Party:

 

“Hey, look at this piece of shit in the suit who says 20% of things that you might like sometimes. Follow them!”

 

No, that’s not inspiring! They’re not taking the fight to anyone. You know, when you see:

 

“Oh, Avi, Yemeni is doing a fundraiser because he’s doing videos on the street, and we’ve got to raise money for Avi!”

 

Like, this is not a hero. He doesn’t have anything heroic about him. There’s nothing heroic about Pauline Hanson. There’s nothing heroic about Alex Antic. There’s something heroic about any of these fucking losers! There is something heroic about Thomas Sewell. And he wouldn’t be heroic if he wasn’t also honourable. He wouldn’t be what he is if he didn’t sometimes make the incorrect tactical decision and do the based option.

 

So I think ultimately it’s going to work out for the best because when he gets out of prison, we’re going to have the party built up. The folklore will be in place. It’s a time for others to step up. You know, Jacob Hersant has to step up. I’ve got to step up. Jack Altis has got to step up.

 

The other state leaders have got to step up. Everyone’s got to step up to ensure that we execute on our plan, which has been set in place. We know what we want to do, what we want to achieve. And I have full confidence that we can achieve it while he’s in prison, so that when he gets out, the movement is in a stronger and better place. So, I’m still feeling positive.

 

I mean, I’m really pissed off that, I mean, you mentioned Tom is not just like a guy to you. He’s a close personal friend. Me, too. He’s one of my best friends. I hate the fact that he’s in a concrete box right now. I hate the fact that he can’t spend time with his kids, he can’t spend time with the boys. That he’s being degraded as a human being by being treated as a prisoner when he did nothing wrong. What he did was moral. Fuck those putrid communist faggots! They deserve worse than what was done to them.

 

And so I feel angry about that. I feel angry about the fact that they’re denying him books, that they’re denying him pen and paper so he can have more productive time in there. I feel a lot better when he’s at least able to read and write and things, things like that. He could get some product productivity out of his time in there. Hopefully that will be rectified soon. But I’ve got a lot of things that I’m angry about, and I hate not being able to hang out with him. He’s one of my best friends.

 

But at the end of the day, I back it. I backed the decision that he made because it was epic! Like him beating up the communists and so on was epic! It was fucking awesome!

 

And ultimately when people look back upon, upon things in the future, if we all do our jobs correctly and we keep advancing the movement, it’ll just become this awesome myth that will end up animating the movement for the better.

 

Blair Cottrell: They definitely won, Tom and the boys, they won every fight. Goodness me! The counter-protesters, they obviously don’t train for that kind of thing enough and maybe Tom’s guys do and that was the difference. There’s maybe a difference in physical health standards as well.

 

But yeah, I had a comment to make on that and now it slipped my mind. It’s really hot tonight. It’s been freezing cold in Melbourne and now all of a sudden it’s really hot! But there’s a storm outside. Have you noticed how hot it is today? I can’t relax because it’s too hot.

 

Joel Davis: It was a warm day up here in Sydney, but I don’t know, it’s a different climate. It’s nice though. I enjoyed it. Good weather.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, Joel’s the dealer in hope, isn’t he guys? Yeah. Joel always ooks at the glass half full. And Joel always has a positive spin to throw on things, which is good. You need people like that.

 

Joel Davis: It’s not just positive spin though. It’s like it’s confidence in what we’re doing. I believe in the power of, … Like that video of the boys bashing Antifa which everyone must have seen. That video has got 10 million views! That video is fucking legendary! Of the NSN taking the streets back from the communist scum! These commies have literally been running the streets of Melbourne on a political basis for decades. They’ve never had their arse handed to them like that in decades! They have been shutting down nationalism, shutting down everything that they don’t like basically.

 

And then they do rallies every other week about their bullshit causes. They think they own the place. And the boys that go down there and send one into the nose of these race traitor pieces of shit, because a lot of them are White race traitors, pathetic little cucks, was fucking awesome! And that is going to inspire the entire global pro-White movement and it’s going to inspire the fighters in Australia to come and join us, so that the movement grows larger.

 

And so the next time we do the street, a street rally and the next time and the next time we’re stronger and stronger and stronger so we can exert our will on the streets, which is what is politics fundamentally. It’s fundamentally about controlling territory. That’s the essence of politics. And in order to get sick cunts, to get hard cunts, to get fighters to join you have to prove that you’re a fighter. Fighters are only going to follow other fighters!

 

[1:08:56]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, the Leftist activists. I think there’s a new generation coming through of Leftist activists as. Well, I mean, a lot of the guys in Tom’s group are part of a new generation of nationalists. So there’s obviously going to be younger and more aggressive communist activists at the same time who are being indoctrinated, who are being exposed to probably more aggressive conditioning than the generation that came before them as well. So everything’s becoming more radical as a result of that.

 

But there used to be basic boundaries and things that Leftist activists wouldn’t do. Those boundaries no longer seem to exist. They’ve been up to all sorts of mischief and just like relentless personal attacks on anyone that they can find, any information they can find on anyone at the rally. And they’re being assisted by major media journalists and government bureaucrats, as always. But it still doesn’t seem strange to them that maybe there are not on the right side.

 

But what I was saying before I got cut off is I’m concerned about the next couple of years for organisers on the right side of centre, if you want to use the political spectrum as a gauge, I don’t usually go for it, but it makes sense to you.

 

Use it in this for this explanation. I’m concerned because, first of all, as I summarized, someone’s been charged for “booing”. Someone’s been charged with three criminal offences for booing people all across the country. Only people who are nationalists or ethnic nationalists are being raided on no evidence and are having their stuff taken. Okay. And as I said, that’s very close to just making stuff up for the police. They’re not playing by the rules anymore. Usually if police are going to raid you for hours and take your stuff and hold it indefinitely, they need to have good evidence that you’ve done something criminal. And they usually only take things relevant to that offence.

 

Now it’s just take all your stuff! Take all your stuff and hold it as long as they want. And they’re doing it for things they know you haven’t done. And without evidence to back up any of it. Right. Very close to just fabricating or making up evidence to throw you away, if that’s what they’re going to do. Creepy shit!

 

And the third thing is Tom’s bail hearing, actually. The prosecutor, the police prosecutor, took the opportunity to add into the submission for why Tom should be remanded in custody. That means not given bail. He said that Tom had made hateful comments on the steps of Parliament, hateful comments about immigration.

 

All right, that’s notable because Tom has been accused of all sorts of violent offences. But then he also slotted the hateful comments remark in there in kind of like a “violent offence sandwich”. You know, you got violent offence, hateful comments, violent offence. And he fed that to the judge and the judge gobbled it up. She swallowed it down! Because after she ate that and made her decision, she said:

 

“People have the right not to be confronted by hatred, or hateful comments.”

 

Okay, so now it’s on record, legally, and the law works on precedent. It’s on record that an activist has been remanded in custody, refused bail. Yes, because he’s been accused of violent offences, but also because he made “hateful comments”. You see, what they’re trying to do here is they’re trying to take “hate speech” or “hateful comments” and they’re trying to elevate the severity of that crime to be similar or even akin to violent crime. So hate speech is going to become like violence in the eyes of the law, and you’ll be sentenced accordingly. Right.

 

So people being charged with criminal offences for booing. What is booing? It’s just voicing their disagreement with political statements. You’re getting charged for that. Raided on no evidence, which can easily lead to just fabricating evidence and hate speech crime possibly being punished as though it’s violence or having the same impact on society as violence. And this is not happening in 10 years. This is not happening for your kids, so you don’t have to worry about it. It’s happening here right now in Australia! It’s hectic, it’s creepy, but that’s our reality.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, that’s true, but we’ll see how that goes in court. Ultimately, like Nathan’s case, I think it has limited prospects of success. We will be going to the High Court because they’re unconstitutional laws, they’re untested laws, untested interpretations that don’t have precedent in Australian law.

 

And so again, there’s a serious legal fight. It isn’t something to just like give up upon:

 

“Oh, well, free speech is gone!”

 

There’s a lot of support for free speech in Australia. It’s the majority of the population and there’s a strong constitutional basis for free speech, at least political speech in this country.

 

[1:13:44]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: There is, but I’m concerned that Australia is becoming so viciously corrupt that the law is just boiling down to who has more resources, who has more influence. And whoever has more influence, which is always going to be the police prosecutor. They work for the government, they’re going to get the result they want. I’m concerned that that’s the situation right now in Australia. I mean, when has any nationalist had any sort of victory in the courts? Can you think of a single example?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, there are examples. I mean, we just had a pretty huge victory where they dropped like pretty much all of our charges in Adelaide. And now we’ve got them on the back foot. And now Stephen Wells is going to be extracting hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages out of South Australia police, if not millions.

 

So there are victories. There’s also a guy who. This is how robust the Constitution is in legal history. There was a guy, this is going back now maybe 10 plus years. And of course I don’t condone this, but it was a Nazi YouTuber, let’s say, but I think he was on YouTube, it was on a different website, who made a video more or less advocating to do a Holocaust, but for real in Australia. He was then charged with inciting violence. He successfully argued in court that, well, he was advocating for political policy. He wasn’t saying that he personally was going to go and build gas chambers and start gassing jews, but that he thinks the government should do it. Ideally in a representative democracy we should be able to elect a leadership on a pro-Holocaust platform or something. And he won the case!

 

So there are cases like this in Australian history. There is a very robust, as I said, constitutional protection for political speech. So there is precedent for victories on that front.

 

Now we’re entering into unprecedented territory with the recent cases that have been brought against members of the organisation. And so it hasn’t been tested properly. Nothing has gone past like the magistrate court level really. We’ve seen Jacob’s case going to the county court for the Roman salute in November. That’ll be interesting. But ultimately this stuff is going to end up in the High Court, more likely.

 

So we’re gonna have to wait and see before we ride it off like it’s Just completely. You can be sceptical that we can win, but I think it’s silly to just write it off when we haven’t even like properly fought, …

 

Blair Cottrell: No, no, that’s not what I’m doing. I’m not black pilling! I’m just looking at the situation objectively.

 

But what I wanted to end on was I think we should be, regardless of what happens, as dissidents, as nationalists, regardless of what they say, what they come up with, what they do to you, you have to keep your chin up and just keep moving forward. Like, you can’t let them break, you can’t let them turn us on each other. You know, don’t be compelled to flip. Don’t think you can go back to quote, unquote, “normal life”, because once you’ve crossed over the threshold, you realise there is no normal life. There’s just a war, an eternal battle for our collective ethnic existence. And we’re in a constant battle with people who don’t want us to exist anymore. Right?

 

That is the truth! So keep your chin up and keep moving forward. But be prepared for things to get really spicy in the next couple of years because As I said, the government, the police, they’re not really playing by the rules right now, not when it comes to Tom’s group specifically. They’re really going hard.

 

Joel Davis: The police definitely aren’t playing by the rules, and lower courts are garbage! Like this woman magistrate. I’ve sat in courtrooms where the magistrate has said things like:

 

“I’m not really in the mood to hear arguments today and statements of this nature.”

 

Female magistrates constantly talking about constantly making the phrase “I feel” in court. What do you mean “you feel”? You’re a magistrate, you’re there to like adjudicate over rational arguments and evidence.

 

So the magistrate’s court is a joke! It’s like it’s no surprise that we get garbage judgements in the Magistrates Court. But there are many levels of court higher than the Magistrates Court. And the higher up you go, the more rational and sensible the whole process gets.

 

So before we exhaust our legal options in higher courts, we should remain confident in victory, and we have a strong legal argument, like I said. Now in this case where where in terms of the so-called assaults or violent disorder on these communists at the so-called Camp Sovereignty, that is a different case that you can’t defend, obviously on the grounds of free speech because it was a physical interaction.

 

But in terms of these speech cases, I feel very confident that we can be successful in court. And even if you’re found guilty of a lot of these things, there’s actually no jail sentence.

 

Blair himself was found guilty of a speech crime years ago and it was a six thousand dollar fine. So it’s not that big of a fucking deal! Like, okay, it sucks to get fined $6,000 but it’s not going to be the end of your life. Right? It’s six grand.

 

So there needs to be a certain amount of a reality check that other than Tom, none of us are in jail right now. We’ve been doing this for years. So clearly the system doesn’t have a super efficient means of putting us away. Yes, they’re passing new laws and they have passed new laws and they’re trying to increase their powers and so on. It’s going to get more difficult.

 

[1:19:32]

 

But also our tactics will adapt to the new laws in kind. We’re not stupid. We know how to read the laws, we know how to study the laws, and we will persevere.

 

There’s a few other things that I wanted to cover. I don’t know what’s going on with Blair, if he’s coming back or if he’s gone. But one of them is there’s two bits of, … There’s a lot of criticism and said online, people calling us Feds and blah, blah, blah. And that’s just silly. Like if we were Feds, why do they just put our leader in jail? You know, if we’re Feds, why would the Prime Minister defend an anti-immigration rally of people who hate him and his government’s policies from the association with Nazis? The idea is:

 

“Oh, the Labor government sends in the Nazi Feds so that everyone at the rally gets called Nazis!”

 

Well, that actually didn’t even happen. In fact, the Prime Minister said the opposite.

 

So the Fed accusations are just ridiculous! There’s zero evidence supporting them. The logic, when people accuse us of being Feds, their logic is either based in falsehoods or their predictions never come true. It’s just garbage!

 

But what I wanted to discuss with two other bits of criticism or analysis. One, statements from various people, including Dave Right Now who gave a speech in Sydney and Stuart Bonds from the One Nation Party who gave a speech in Sydney. These people were saying that National Socialism and communism, these are the same thing as one another. I challenged both of these gentlemen to a debate on the subject. If they really believe this, they should be willing to sit down and debate me on the subject. We can have a neutral host that’ll make sure that it’s fair and so on. I’m not interested in getting into some kind of insult match with these people, but to have a sincere, gentlemanly, scholarly debate on the subject.

 

You know, Stuart Bonds is a he almost got elected up in the Hunter region for the One Nation Party. I think he was the most successful One Nation candidate. He was the most successful One Nation candidate in the lower house at the last election. He got the largest share of the vote in the lower house. He didn’t get elected, but he gave it a crack. He came close. So he’s a serious player in politics, let’s say, like one day he probably will end up in Parliament. So if he wants to call us communists, I take offence at that. It was our boys literally bashing through lines of communists to ensure that the rally was successful in Melbourne. No one hates us more than communists.

 

This idea that we’re somehow the same as communists, just racist or something, is ridiculous! Fundamentally, communists, historically. What was the opposition movement in Europe when communists threatened to take over Europe? It was the National Socialists and the fascists that fought the biggest war in human history to prevent communists from taking over Europe. Why did Hitler get elected in Germany? Why did the people support Mussolini? Why were fascist governments popping up all throughout Central Europe and beyond, Spain, Eastern Europe? Why? Because the people feared the rise of communism and they turned to the fascists to stop communists. Fascism is the antidote to communism! Fascism is the break glass option when the communists start taking over. That’s what motivated the people of Europe to get behind National Socialism and fascism, was the rise of communism.

 

So this idea that we’re all the same is just insane! It’s ridiculous! These movements are bitter enemies! Why are they bitter enemies? Because they fundamentally have a totally opposite view of human nature. Communists, they deny the reality of race. They view basically all men as being created equal. And they see all inequality between peoples, whether they be groups or individuals, as the product of artificial forms of exploitation created by structures of power within society. And they therefore want to tear down those structures of power and engage in their revolutionary activity to destroy society. Because basically any kind of function within society which ensures a distinction of quality, that people who contribute more are rewarded more than people who contribute less, that people who have more to offer are given more access than people who have less to offer, and so on.

 

Any kind of quality control within society they view as immoral, they view as something that needs to be destroyed, and therefore they want to destroy quality. Equality is the opposite of quality, should be called a-quality because equality is basically a prohibition on qualitative judgements between human beings being socially enforced in any kind of way. That’s what communists believe in.

 

What National Socialists believe in. National Socialists don’t just believe in the value of race and wanting to defend our race. Obviously that’s an integral. But National Socialists believe in hierarchy. National Socialists defended private property against Communists in the Weimar Republic. National Socialists defended hierarchical structures and supported the creation through the SS of a new aristocracy in Europe, supported eugenic breeding practices, supported a whole series of social reforms that would elevate the good blood, elevate people of quality into positions of power and esteem and status. It was about breeding up the race and therefore elevating society according to aristocratic principles.

 

So it’s a totally antithetical ideology, which is why communists allied with liberals against National Socialists and why to this day the communists ally with the forces of liberalism, the forces of capitalism against us!

 

[1:26:47]

 

So why would they be sitting on the far-Left and us on the far-Right if we had the same views? It’s a fundamentally insane position. So I challenge Stuart to a debate. Let’s set it up. There’s people I’ve spoken to behind the scenes that would be interested in potentially hosting it who don’t endorse fundamentally what I believe, but would think that it would be interesting. I think it would do views. I think NSN versus One Nation, the debate would be fun. He seems like a good sport.

 

If you want to talk shit online, back it up! Debate me! If you really believe that National Socialists are just like racist communists, let’s debate the subject or retract the statement if you’re not willing to actually back it up in a debate.

 

The other thing that I would like to address, I guess, is this “hijack narrative”, this view that:

 

“Oh, the NSN came in and just hijacked the March for Australia!”

 

No, we participated. We didn’t hijack. We worked with the other people in the march, and we were welcome in the march, as I said. We were literally given an ovation by the other rally goals when we showed up in Sydney. In Melbourne, we basically ran the whole thing and made the whole thing possible. We were helping and facilitating the march. And we had a core objective which we stated publicly before the march, which was to prevent, you know, establishment conservative, Zionist and other foreign forces from subverting the march and watering down its message. And I think we more or less executed on those objectives.

 

So if you’re happy with how nationalist the march was, with how pure its message was and so on, there’s other people to thank. But you should be also thanking us. We help to contribute to that eventuality, and we will help in future March for Australia events in a similar way.

 

And I think we earned it. No one else literally fought their way through hordes of communists to facilitate the March for Australia except the NSN.

 

So it’s like credit where credit’s fucking due! We got guys that are doing time now over facilitating that march.

 

Yeah, let’s just do some Superchats I guess and end the stream because I think Blair is off. White Triple Six said:

 

“Sending well wishes from Minnesota. Free Thomas Sewell!”

 

Yes, Free Thomas Sewell. I Was Made Up gifted subscriptions. Why are you gifting me subscriptions? Just send a Superchat. It’s kind of weird! What am I going to do with subscriptions? Joey JoJo12345 said:

 

“If you haven’t joined the NSN or at least given money, are you even White?”

 

Good point. Support the org. Evon626 said:

 

“There should be a call to a rally that says if you marched in Melbourne and you were not attacked, it is because of Tom Sewell preventing it.”

 

Well, I mean I think that was made clear that the boys secured the position in Melbourne very effectively. The footage makes that blatantly clear and eyewitness accounts of the day makes that blatantly clear.

 

Now there’s a lot of talk about this rally on in September 13, which is a cuck rally basically, which is a lot of the elements that were pushed out of August 31st who wanted to water August 31st down and cuck it out, or who counter signaled August 31st for being staunchly nationalist in its messaging. They consolidated to organise the September 13 March, which is a cringe display like the poster. It’s not the same thing.

 

A lot of people think incorrectly that it’s the same thing as the March for Australia or like some kind of continuity from the March for Australia. No one involved in the March for Australia is going to be involved in this rally.

 

And I would say to patriots stay home! Fuck this rally! Boycott this rally! Now okay, it’s got some all right issues here, but it’s like “Australia unites against government corruption”. This is the poster. Like this is vague! A rally against mass immigration, it’s a very controversial, spicy existential issue, one single issue obviously paired with the notion of Australian identity. But that’s what makes mass immigration an issue. It wasn’t just a rally about the housing crisis caused by mass immigration or economic consequences of mass immigration, but specifically, obviously mass immigration has economic consequences, but specifically the fact that mass immigration is destroying our national identity. And it was the assertion of our national identity and the defense of our national identity that animated Aug. 31, and will animate future March for Australia events and rallies and so on.

 

This is what conservatives always do. “Social media, ban digital ID”. Like they’re just like slapping together “Reform immigration policies”. Like what does that even mean? They slap together a whole series of vague issues and you think:

 

“Oh well I agree on those issues, I guess that’s a good thing.”

 

But then what is the meaning of this march going to be? This march is not going to police foreign flags. You’re going to see foreign flags, you’re going to see abo flags everywhere. It’s not going to be a sea of White Aussies with Aussie flags. It’s going to be a shit show, a admixture of all these different garbage side quest groups or watered down ideological groups. There’s even people that are marching explicitly against racism, against Nazism, in defense of Aboriginal sovereignty and all this shit! It’s like this hodgepodge of disparate groups. There’s no fundamental meaning or purpose to any of this. It was slapped together simply because August 31st was happening. They were salty that they couldn’t ruin it. And so now they’ve got to do their own cuck event.

 

[1:32:15]

 

 

And they’ll bring out a bunch of politicians and cuckservative speakers and so on onto the stage. They won’t get the turnout like last time. It won’t be interesting. It won’t count for anything. Don’t go! Fuck this bd! And if Antifa show up and bash everyone there in Melbourne, in the other cities it’s relatively safe. But if they ever show up in Melbourne and beat up everyone there, the NSN would be there to protect you. Good luck! Sorry to say, like if there’s grandmas or whatever, we love our grandmas that are misguided, but don’t let your grandma go to this.

 

Don’t let people go to this is garbage much for Australia. Will do another rally soon. They’re in talks, from what I’ve heard discussion of maybe a late October rally. But I don’t know for sure. I guess we’ll find out. Wait for that. Proper patriot anti-immigration rally and focus on building momentum up for Australia Day and having big march, anti-immigration marches, seas of Aussie flags. That’s what we want. The rationale here is like:

 

“Well, if we water it down, we’ll get more of a turnout.”

 

I think they’ll get less of a turnout. That’s why you should stay home and tell everyone you know to stay home and not go to this. Because I want the proof to be in the evidence of the images that we see from this rally that it’s a much weaker turnout than August 31st, to show that the energy on the Australian Right is for nationalism. It’s not for this hodgepodge of freedom movement and conservative issues or something. The energy is specifically about nationalism, it’s specifically about immigration. That’s what’s turning people out. That’s what people are angry about.

 

And that’s all that we should really be discussing because that’s the core existential issue. Not that we shouldn’t talk about free speech and other issues, but that needs to be the central animating issue of the Australian right. And if it isn’t, it’s because somebody is a non-White themselves and wants to defend their position in Australia. Someone is a careerist in the political scene and wants to avoid controversy so they can ingratiate themselves with the establishment. It’s one of those two things why someone would want to put on this cuck rally to compete with the March for Australia.

 

Rygo Weber said:

 

“I was at the Melbourne march and was super proud of the boys for protecting everyone. I saw the boys smash through the blockades and numerous normal Aussies cheering on Tom during his speech.”

 

Yes. I’ve just heard only good reports from people that I know that went there that weren’t part of the organisation. And I’m very proud of the boys, what they did in Melbourne. Everyone I know that was in Melbourne has told me that it was the fucking best day of their lives! That it was just fucking awesome! Anarchy on the streets of Melbourne, bashing commies, leading the charge of the patriots.

 

I did feel, I’ll be honest, I did feel kind of sad. I already was feeling sad I was going to miss out on the Melbourne march. It was good that I was in Sydney. We had a really good rally in Sydney. I gave a speech, Jack Eltis gave a speech, another gentleman from the Org gave a speech, and we had a great day out with the NSN in Sydney. Shook hundreds and hundreds of hands! So many people came up to me to thank me for what I was doing, to show their support. We had a great night! Sinking beers with the patriots. It was a great day, great evening, and I loved it! And I was glad to be here in Sydney.

 

But at the same time, the Melbourne rally was just like fireworks! Like and I knew it was going to be fireworks and so I do feel a little bit sad to have missed out. But what a day! What a day for the boys. DJ Triumph said:

 

“Hail Sewell! Hope he returns as leader sooner rather than later. God forbid he ends up martyr for the movement. I have faith the NSM will continue its forward momentum. Blood and honour!”

 

Yeah, well, he will be back out of prison. Hopefully sooner rather than later. I mean, hopefully he gets bail and he has the chance to come out, get his affairs in order, get shit together before, if he does have to serve time before serving it, rather than just being stuck in there. But we’re preparing for the worst, hoping for the best! That’s what we’re doing and we appreciate your support.

 

I know a lot of people have been saying the GiveSendGo is down. We raised $75,000 in like a day through GiveSendGo. Incredible outpouring of support. Then GiveSendGo withheld the donation. Like they basically shut it down and put it under review. We’ve been in contact with GiveSendGo trying to get it restored.

 

So if they don’t restore it, there’s going to be a big problem for GiveSendGo. GiveSendGo, this is a website which enabled that nigger who stabbed a White guy and killed him to raise half a million dollars! This is supposed to be the Right-wing free speech, you know, fundraising platform. They facilitated that. People want to donate money so that Thomas Sewell and the boys can defend themselves in court against charges people feel is unjust. Where they were out trying to have an anti-immigration rally here in Melbourne or here in Australia. Communist pieces of shit engaged in violence to try and stop that. And the boys have now cop charges standing up to those communists. A lot of people, a lot of pro-White people around the world, particularly in Australia, want to support a legal defense to keep these guys out of prison because they recognise that what they did was morally good. Now you can have a position that violence is bad or whatever, but at the end of the day they’re entitled to a legal defense. That’s what the money is being raised for. The money isn’t being raised to go and like pay for people to go and beat up Aboriginals or something it’s to facilitate a good legal defense. Tom and the boys.

 

[1:38:19]

 

So there is simply no justification for GiveSendGo not restoring this. Now we’re giving them a chance to restore it is under review. They haven’t said that:

 

“Nah! It’s over, fuck you!”

 

They haven’t told us to fuck off! If it’s just going to go under review for a few days and they restore it, then okay, that’s okay. It is what it is if they don’t restore it’s going to be a big PR problem for GiveSendGo.

 

A lot of people are going to be very angry and we’ll keep you guys updated as to whether it gets restored or denied or what. So keep an eye out and we’ll let you know. Dimmer 1313 said:

 

“How’s recruitment growing? Has there been an increase in interest since Sunday?”

 

Yes, a lot of recruits coming in. A lot of new people getting vetted that I know about in Melbourne, in Sydney. I’m sure around the country the chapters are growing in numbers and a lot of people have signed up as a supporter. White Australia.org. You should do it right now. If you’re an Australian citizen, sign up as a political supporter@white Australia.org. If you’re a sign up as a social supporter, upgrade to political supporter. Because if you’re a social supporter, that doesn’t necessarily help us to get registered as a political party. You need to be a political supporter so that we can you can be a member of the party proper. When we get registered with the AEC, we need to build this political party. We need to have a big, robust, thick membership so that we can maintain our registration. If it’s like 1, 501 then they can audit a few people and if people don’t return their calls or emails or something, they can cancel the registration.

 

So we need to have a glut of members! We need when you get into the 2000s, the 3000s, the 4000s of political supporters. So please sign up White Australia.org. It costs you nothing. We’ve got very good security. We’re going to do everything we can to protect your identity.

 

Before we register as a party, we’re going to send out information on how you can register as a silent elector so that you can ensure that your name can’t be searched up on the political electoral role. On the electoral role, I should say. Google it right now. How to be a silent elector. Everyone watching this, if you’re in Australia, Google how to be a silent elector. Become a silent elector right now. Just get your name off publicly accessible electoral rolls. It’s very simple. It’s very easy to do. That protects your identity regardless of whether you sign up as a supporter or not.

 

But in particular, you should do that if you want to sign up as a supporter. But we’re not even registering as a party just yet. We’re going to give you warning and send out information on how to do that. But we on our end have really good security, really good protection. Like, if not us, then who? We’re the only people in this country that are going to build a proper, uncompromising, White nationalist political party that has a chance at truly changing the political system in Australia. Completely a wrench into the system. That’s what we are! No one is going to have policies like us. No one is going to have notoriety like us. No one is as effective as us, as we’re going to be in, anywhere close in changing the conversation and subverting the narrative.

 

And ultimately, I really do feel confident we can get people elected. We can get the first Nazis elected basically anywhere in the world in the 21st century here in Australia. WhiteAustralia.org! Like sign up support us. Everything we do is for White Australia! That’s like the be all and end all for us.

 

So if you’re a White Australian, why would you not support a political party that just wants not just to secure this country for the race, but to enable this country to thrive, to restore our national sovereignty, which is under attack economically, militarily and so on. We want to seize control of the banks. We want to delete your mortgages. We want to get rid of usury. We want to make it. We want to rebuild the middle class. We want to pay your misses to stay home and breed White babies. We want to restore the White race in this country. We want the great Australian dream. Big White families. Everyone owns their own home. We have a plan to do it. So White Australia.org!

 

Michael underscore Goldberg 123 said:

 

“What happened to the GiveSendGo?”

 

I just addressed that. RL Underscore Nationalist said:

 

“So you can kill an innocent child and get 2k fine. But if you have a different political opinion, you get a year jail?”

 

Yeah, so, I mean, that was a story where were they Indian, were they Pakistani? There was some kind of like brown subcontinental garbage. They literally ran over and killed a school child. Were they even in school yet? Were they like a preschooler? Like a young child, … Walked away without prison with a small fine. I mean that’s just insane! Like they recklessly endangering children’s lives, killing them, no retribution. But Tom can’t even get bail.

 

So obviously putrid anti-White system! That’s what we’re dealing with. Spencey101 said:

 

“In the first fight you can see a communist who instigated violence wearing gloves inside the designated zone. When gloves are strictly prohibited, his face is shown. Why hasn’t he been arrested?”

 

This is a great point.

 

[1:43:59]

 

So the whole Melbourne CBD was a designated area, which means police can search people for weapons. And if you’re carrying illegal weapons, obviously that’s illegal. And wearing bike gloves if you’re not actually riding a motorcycle is illegal in Australia because they enable you to beat someone up with more effectively, obviously.

 

Anyway, I think it’s kind of a ridiculous law, but nevertheless it is the law.

 

But yeah, Antifa were allowed to have weapons, prohibited weapons and they still got their arse handed to them even though the police have a total double standard. Lieb Dick said:

 

“Good to see you at the march in Sydney, Joel. My mates and I all agreed that it felt much safer and in good hands with the vanguard up front. Hail the vanguard. Hail White Australia. Was good to see you too.”

 

I’m not sure exactly who you are, obviously, but so many people came up and said hello and I really appreciated that if you do see me, I am an approachable guy. If you’re a friendly person, if you’re a supporter. It happens a lot when I go out in public these days. You can come have a chat. I don’t mind. You don’t have to be intimidated. I know I can be intimidating, but I’m actually a nice guy. Lion Cross said:

 

“The September 13th rally is going to be a mess. Antifa regrouping and building bigger numbers to retaliate. Wouldn’t surprise if it gets rolled without the NSN.”

 

Yep. Well, that’s their problem. Hail Yay said:

 

“Shook hands with you before the march in Sydney. Sucks. Tom got arrested.”

 

Yeah, it does. It sucks! Good bloke said:

 

“Would people be judged purely on ancestry or in demonstrated loyalty and contribution to the nation?”

 

Of course we judge people on loyalty and contribution to the nation. It is blood and honour! Not just blood. Blood is worthless without honour. And Good bloke also said:

 

“Would deportations be part of the plan?”

 

Or maybe this is like a multi-Superchat thing. He said:

 

“Would deportation be part of the plan? If so, who would qualify? Migrants only. Or Australian citizens born here as well?”

 

Yeah, just because you have an Australian citizenship doesn’t mean we can’t deport you. Particularly if you’re a dual citizen, or if we can trace your ancestry to some other third world country, we can revoke citizenship and deport people to their shithole of ancestral origin. Ultra Saxon said:

 

“When I look at a man like Sewell I feel as though I’m looking at a Fuhrer as an Anglo Saxon. It makes me feel proud to know Thomas my kin. Hail Sewell!”

 

Well indeed. Thomas Sewell is a supreme gentleman and he just had like a goat run, like what a week. What a week he just had!

 

What have we got more Superchats here? I’m just scrolling through on Entropy the ThinRedLine said:

 

“Thank you NSN from Europe. Free Thomas Sewell! Joel, would you do a stream with Eric Striker?”

 

Well many years ago I did a few with Eric Striker. He talked a lot of shit about me in the time since we had been on good terms. And I did challenge him to a debate on Australian nationalism. Eric Striker claims to be a National Socialist but out of his personal animosity towards me he agreed with the position that Australia doesn’t need National Socialism and should embrace some kind of non-National Socialist nationalism. So I offered to debate him and he left me on scene.

 

Open Borders for Israel said:

 

“Hail Tom, hail Blair, Hail Joel and hail the NSN!”

 

Well thank you. Annabellacaust said:

 

“One month subscriber streak.”

 

Some Not on the Net said:

 

“Booing the acknowledgment of country Anzac Day is the future. Every major city on Anzac Day. It would be great optics for normies yet.”

 

Well next year if they do Welcome to Country at the Anzac Day services, you better all be there, and you better all be booing because it’s just disgusting! I mean that is the day of all days. It is the last day for that shit! Brian said:

 

“Great stream! Hail victory!”

 

I appreciate it. And I saw Annabellacaust left a Superchat last week asking:

 

“How does one approach the lads on Sunday?”

 

Obviously this was in before the rally last week. And it’s as simple as just simply seeing us and coming and saying hello, obviously.

 

So anyway, great stream tonight! I hope you guys enjoyed it. I thought it was a good episode despite Blair’s technical difficulties. And I put up a black sheet behind me which I thought looked quite good. Kind of thought that looked quite nice. I’m gonna do that in the future. But the idea to put it up was literally a few minutes before we started streaming, and so I just used like some shitty tape that I found lying around the house. And about an hour into the stream, the tape gave out. So I think I’m gonna have to get hooks or something for next time.

 

But I think it was a good look! In the chat. Do you like the black sheet? If you like the black sheet, put HH, …

 

[sound cut out for a couple of minutes]

 

I don’t understand why it just like mutes, and then I have to unmute it. I was just going through Superchats.

 

But yeah, what like a technical fuckfest of a stream! I apologise to the patriots out there. The Mossad has been fucking with me. There was a few other Superchats here that I read out. They were pretty like mid Superchats. I’m not going to read them again. What I will say, did you guys hear me talk about the black sheet? I don’t think anyone heard me talk about the black sheet.

 

So what I said was I put the black sheet up at the beginning of the stream. I think it looked good. Yeah, you talked about. So if you like the black sheet, I need to get hooks or something. Put HH. If you don’t like the black sheet, put F, and we’ll see who wins HH or F. You heard this part? We’re getting HHs. Okay. I think we’re going to bring the black sheet back. People saying, add runes to the black sheet. Look, one step at a time. One step at a time. But Heidi Allen said:

 

“No to the black sheet. It looks shit!”

 

I’m getting F’s in the chat! I thought the black sheet looked good! It’s polarizing opinion. I was expecting the black sheet to be popular, but it’s really polarizing opinion. People are saying Aussie flag. Well, look, someone votes for giant hooks. Yeah, well, the hooks are coming. People are demanding runes. Okay, it’s gonna be, … Okay. Who can sew? Who’s good at arts and crafts? Because, you’re making all these demands, like, …

 

But yeah, there’s one Superchat here. Some guy pretending to be a fed. TND 1488, White power saying:

 

“Hail Australia!”

 

And Rygo Weber saying:

 

“That NSN fight video smashing Antifa was so good, it reminded me of the 300 movie.”

 

And like, I love that video of the boys smashing Antifa so much. It’s fucking awesome! But I honestly, I can’t help but feel like I missed out and it makes me depressed. It seemed like the best day ever! Aussie Narralist, I presume he spelled nationalist wrong by mistake said:

 

“His wife will knit me one.”

 

Well, hit me up in the DMs. If your wife is going to knit me one, let me know.

 

But look. Hail White Australia! White power, blood and honour! Hail victory! We’re done. We’re done for the evening. I’m going to end the stream there. Hope you enjoyed the show. See you all next week.

 

[1:53:36]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 9/8/2025 = 68)

[Sorted by latest at top]

GusHayden
Supporter
53 minutes ago
Someone stole bro sheet
0 likes

Report
GusHayden
Supporter
1 hour ago
This is the stuff of folklore, this is the stuff of legend. ~ Joel Davis
0 likes

Report
GusHayden
Supporter
1 hour ago
Blair was 100% spot on around that 27min mark. He was in the zone big time
0 likes

Report
EarthlingCarl
2 hours ago
No offence but I think you guys really need to have more self control as going around getting involved in these fights is just giving the state what they want (it doesn’t matter if you were attacked first). Tom being locked up for 2 years is a nightmare for a movement that’s just getting going.
1 like

Report
WhiteWulfWodanaz
3 hours ago
The arrest of Thomas might have a positive of shutting people up who call you Feds
1 like

Report
Soozysuz
3 hours ago
Melbourne was awesome!! Fuck the commies!
1 like

Report
WhiteWulfWodanaz
4 hours ago
I appreciate Blair being honest and addressing that the camp sovereignty fight was in bad judgement. It’s great to see our guys learning from their mistakes and only getting better. Hail Australia
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
WhiteWulfWodanaz
4 hours ago
I also appreciate what Joel said, that who Thomas is means that you gotta take the good with the bad. And overall it’s good. I do feel sorry for Tom though, I wish him all the best in the world and a swift release into freedom
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
WhiteWulfWodanaz
4 hours ago
Fully agree with Joel that this march was so successful in making people realise they aren’t alone as Nationalists. I know it did so with me. Also agree with Blair that we need to direct that new energy into tangible results like a NS Party
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
WhiteWulfWodanaz
4 hours ago
Love Joel’s anti black pill speech
0 likes
Report
LaserFash
4 hours ago
Tom, and the leadership at large, needs to delegate the punching and rowdy behavior to the ranks. Be a leader and learn to delegate!
2 likes

Report
Bigboy6669
5 hours ago
Hail Thomas sewell
1 like

Report
Soozysuz
5 hours ago
I really hope Tom gets out sooner rather than later. His speech was incredible and not one person I saw turned away, because he was right! Look forward to a massive Australia Day March with millions!
0 likes

Report
ForRealers
5 hours ago
We should plaster that antifa dudes face all over the polices social media accounts and demand his arrest
0 likes

Report
palacepony
Supporter
5 hours ago
That’s a cool clip Joel @ 55:00
0 likes

Report
imSofaKingRayZest
6 hours ago
communism is judaism
1 like

Report
palacepony
Supporter
6 hours ago
Joel sound disappears for around 5 mins @ 37:00 mins. Returns 40:20? Stream beset with a few tech difficulties. Still, a worthy watch. Thanks lads
0 likes

Report
imSofaKingRayZest
6 hours ago
white australia will not slip quietly into the night
1 like

Report
TVR_
6 hours ago
Black sheet goes hard. The flag would be better.
0 likes

Report
imSofaKingRayZest
6 hours ago
free thomas sewell t shirts
1 like

Report
SilphC0
Verified
7 hours ago
Blair always makes such good, sober points. One massive issue with the active clubs around the world is that they’re chock full of grug brain deliquent criminals just looking for opportunities to fight. They simply espouse nationalism as their raison d’être because it gets them closer to punching faces. I just saw some dude, “will2rise” make a video sounding like a total n*gg*r laughing about being in jail for 8 years and how it’s just “whatever”. Active club? Prison is the definition of inactivity. Strategically, our guys should always be doing the utmost to avoid the judicial system but instead the movement is like 90% our guys literally KO’ing eachother all week long and getting brain damage. They never even use their violence against the enemy, it’s ridiculous. Of course these risks are most prevalant for leadership and that’s what makes them so honourable but normalizing going to jail is just being a n*gg*r. The obsession with violence and fighting within organizations edges guys so hard they can’t restrasin themselves from the impulse once they encounter the smallest opportunity. It’s an aspect worth reevaluating.
1 like

Report
TruthWillSetYouFree1488
7 hours ago
Talk about Chabad Lubavitch
0 likes

Report
WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
7 hours ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE
0 likes

Report
Jak_85
Supporter
9 hours ago
Joel Davis’ speeches are alway chilling and legendary. Thomas Sewell does best in the face of adversity and his theological talks are epic
1 like

Report
TuckerLimehouse
Supporter
9 hours ago
It’s becoming clear around the world, we can either fight along side the NS and keep what’s left of our civilizations, or we can be subjects of Communist tyranny.
1 like

Report
NateAus
9 hours ago
great to meet you at the march, got on a video with you on becfreedoms instagram page, keep fighting the good fight
1 like

Report
SunkToTheNutz
9 hours ago
Blair’s right, Joel. Love what you’re doing, but you MUST be more tactical! At this point, Tom being locked up is an unmitigated disaster! Tom’s proven himself long ago, it’s high time to rally the troops with laser-like precision to create a LEGITIMATE new pro-White party. NO more unnecessary blunders!
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
LaserFash
4 hours ago
Tom has proven himself enough and doesn’t need to be the one punching anymore. Be a leader and delegate!
1 like

Report
AmalekAvenger
10 hours ago
you need a producer
1 like

Report
hueyvam123
11 hours ago
Where’s the video?
0 likes

Report
Celsus
11 hours ago
Subscriptions are more dollars in your pocket than superchats. Check out the difference. Someone gifting a subscription to other chat participants is worth more than superchatting an equivalent amount.
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
AmalekAvenger
10 hours ago
what is the best way to get money to the lads ?
0 likes

Report
FancypantsandMP5S
VerifiedSupporter+
14 hours ago
The black sheet of the family
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
10 hours ago
HaHa the Antique glass & house doorway painted white is the true optic winner here
1 like

Report
radi8wl
14 hours ago
Sorry Blair, really! I was one of the few i suppose who defended you on social media back when you were in the spotlight, but right now you are being a negative Nancy, you may think that you sound like a ‘civilized rational high iq gentleman’ with all your quoting of laws, ‘concern’and faux intellectualism, but you just sound scared and effeminate, we need our White Men wielding Power, justly but unmercifully! No amount of pathetic crying from jews,poc, sympathetic White Women should sway our men from doing what is Right and that’s 95%+ population of Whites in White countries! Mixed race, race mixers,poc and all Whites that sympathize w other races above their own go with them bc obv their dna is defective. I’m GenX and the feminization of men is scary even the ones in in the so called dissident right. No dig at you, but Tom is the ONLY man in the ‘far right’ with the not only a high iq, but truly understand the big esoteric picture (except he’s fallen for the jew false characterization of Jesus). Most women are sick to death of cowardly White Men blathering on their podcasts trying to disassociate themselves from the nazzzzeeeeeesssss all while grifting other Whites who are praying for the next Hitler archetype to emerge, it’s ALL that’s happening in USA since the optics cucks won after UTR,we don’t need anymore effin papers, or ‘waking up the normies’ there is nothing new under the sun. And if covid taught us anything, the normies will do what they’re told! I only wish Tom was in America, where all the ‘White Men’sound like you or they’re sheep dipped with retarded jew pagan symbols tattooed on their face, proving to everyone they make bad decisions, or mixed race or civnats, even the guy starting the ‘White’ town has mixed-race family members and defends them lmfao so pathetic here in usa
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
Australian_Terra
10 hours ago
Criticising a bad decision doesn’t make him effeminate.
4 likes

Report
FancypantsandMP5S
VerifiedSupporter+
13 hours ago
The man that sticks by his mixed race family members is a better man than the one that cuts them off. He is obviously making the best of other family members bad choices. Blair is a good guy not everyone on the right has to agree on everything the guy is not a follower
3 likes

Report
JFurM
Verified
14 hours ago
Not surprising but still disappointing for the sake of the movement here in the US, Nick Fuentes criticizing NSN during the March, you don’t see him out there being active!
8 likes

Report
radi8wl
14 hours ago
At the 54min mark had to pause.I’m sorry Blair, we love you, you were ahead of your time in oz, I know you weren’t turned or a subversive, but you sound like your girlfriend talking or any 2013 conservative. It sounds like everything that you’re saying is for some possible future jury in defense of yourself for associating with Thomas. Like you have ptsd and are stuck in whatever year it was when you fought pedo’s in the street. That was Noble you shouldn’t be ashamed. If associating with nsm has you this fearful, maybe take a break bc you’re doing exactly what the optics cucks did here in usa after unite the right. Tbh if you weren’t Blair Cottrell I’d think you were a subversive We need real White Men that have the courage of their convictions. Tom is the Hero we need, the Germans did nothing wrong, it’s 2025 and people know Hitler was the good guy, even if they don’t say it out loud to strangers… Yet!
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
Australian_Terra
10 hours ago
Charging the hill was dumb. That’s all he’s saying.
4 likes

Report
freedomfighter356
8 hours ago
mate they already won they could’ve called the police told them what was happening and left Tom and some of the boys could get up to 5 years in jail Thomas Sewel is legit 50% of the group and its growth
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
6 hours ago
2 motorbike cops were across the road from where a 2 on 50 gang bashing took place and the did NOTHING
0 likes

Report
JFurM
Verified
15 hours ago
And exactly what the government wants is NSN to be afraid with all the ridiculous legal nonsense they throw at them, and if that doesn’t work they probably will threaten or enact violence against NSN members, but that’s exactly why the boys need to keep growing in number and keep pushing on.
9 likes

Report
JFurM
Verified
15 hours ago
We do really need to boost and cheer on our Aussie brothers and sisters though, because if they can’t succeed with Nationalism, there is t much hope for the rest of us Anglo nations.
5 likes

Report
Australian_Terra
15 hours ago
Charging the hill was regarded.
0 likes

Report
Dissident_Loner
Supporter
15 hours ago
I feel really sorry for Tom. A good hearted man who looked after orphans. I saw him on PWR with his daughter the other day. His kids are being traumatised. Similar thing with Sam Melia. The Jews behind this are absolutely evil and their Shabbos Goy traitor puppets equally so. They are lashing out in desperation now because they know what fate awaits them when nationalist take power.
29 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
GusHayden
Supporter
1 hour ago
Don’t feel sorry for him. He has God on his side, and he knows it. A lot of us do.
0 likes

Report
JFurM
Verified
15 hours ago
Agree with Joel and Blair (pertaining to the impact of the events of the march specifically with the NSN and Tom) yes, Tom’s myths as a leader is cemented but also yes, it’s getting more dangerous. Just look at what’s going on with the AFD party in Germany! Not a reason to cower, but to count the cost and keep going
5 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
6 hours ago
7 dead afd politicians in 3 weeks and the eu has said if the afd win german election they will annul elections blocking them from taking any power ever. stay frosty my white brothers.
0 likes

Report
Sullivista
16 hours ago
So many fucking commercials
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
ItWasMadeUp
VerifiedSubSupporter
16 hours ago
$5 a month subscription to his channel, makes it ad-free & you will be supporting Joel.
2 likes

Report
Trying567
17 hours ago
I’ve tried to boost the other side of the story in comments online, but yeah, the move to charge the hill by the NSN was a major optical blunder. There were enough of them, too, that they probably could have gone to either side of the hill and just done retaliatory defense.
5 likes

Report
TheBeardedIndian
Supporter+
18 hours ago
Jacinta Allan’s face looks droopy like a Basset Hound.
13 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
katana17
10 hours ago
Basset Hound’s object to this comparison!
1 like

Delete
ProletAryan
18 hours ago
I like eric strikers analysis on many subjects but after listening to his podcast for about a year or so, I get the feeling that he has some animosity towards Anglo cultures and Australians in general over some Anglos Vs Wogs complex he has. He has complained about and mentioned before that family members of his who came to Australia to work from South America were supposedly not respected or treated well in Australia.
7 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
Jak_85
Supporter
13 hours ago
I’ve noticed the Med v Northerner nuanced splits over the years as well. It’s subtle but explains a lot.
1 like

Report
PureWhitey
19 hours ago
When Blair is on point he’s got command presence. A powerful speaker.
21 likes

Report
TheQueensGuard
Supporter
19 hours ago
Joels mic disappeared for like 5 minutes that was aids cunt
17 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
GusHayden
Supporter
1 hour ago
Intercepted….
0 likes

Report
freedomfighter356
21 hours ago
Blair’s right what Thomas did was stupid, and generally terrible for the movement
-5 likes

Report
evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
21 hours ago
Boost this question to GiveSendGo asking why they froze White Australia funds: https://x.com/origindevel/status/1964669272745230355
8 likes

Report
Dumpstertron
VerifiedSupporter
23 hours ago
Fuck you Joel!! Fully on board with the NSN agenda but went to shake your hand in Sydney at the August 31 march, but your boys baulked that shit
-5 likes

Report
‹ Hide 3 replies
mharrison52
20 hours ago
people like joel must have body guards. surely you understand why.
4 likes

Report
freedomfighter356
21 hours ago
why?
1 like

Report
TheQueensGuard
Supporter
19 hours ago
probably coz ur jewish lad
1 like

Report
katana17
1 day ago
[Blair Cottrell – Australians Unite to Stop Immigration – Aug 31, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/09/03/blair-cottrell-australians-unite-to-stop-immigration-aug-31-2025-transcript/ [In this video Australian pro-White activist Blair Cottrell gives a running commentary and interactions during his attendance at the Melbourne “March for Australia” event held on August 31, 2025. – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 2,290 – Duration: 21 mins]
6 likes

Delete
katana17
1 day ago
[Thomas Sewell’s Speech at the March for Australia Rally in Melbourne – Aug 31, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/09/06/thomas-sewells-speech-at-the-march-for-australia-rally-in-melbourne-aug-31-2025-transcript/ [Aussie pro-White nationalist activist, founder of NSN, Tom Sewell gives a rallying speech at the March for Australia event in Melbourne on Sun, August 31, 2025: – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 855 – Duration: 8:30 mins]
7 likes

Delete
katana17
1 day ago
[Joel Davis – Patriots in Control of the Streets – Aug 29, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/09/05/joel-davis-patriots-in-control-of-the-streets-aug-29-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists and NSN members Joel Davis and Jacob Hersant discuss the coming March for Australia event that was held on Sunday, August 31st in Australian capital cities to protest against mass immigration. – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 18,189 – Duration: 111 mins]
4 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Host: Good evening, everyone. Tonight I am jumping on stream to have a chat about the election with everyone’s favourite, Joel Davis. Welcome, Joel.

 

Joel Davis: Good to be on.

 

Host: We wanted to have a chat about the upcoming election because there’s a lot of discourse that you guys have got heavy on your chest that you want to let out, and I think it’s a good time to do it. We’re on the final leg of the election campaign and you guys stirred up quite a bit of controversy on Anzac Day, so I thought we’d talk about that first.

 

One question that I haven’t seen answered, at least on my feed is the things surrounding the planning of it. I want to know, like, was that planned going to the Anzac Day memorial and choreographing that booing. I don’t know what time it was, but I think it was like, maybe five, six o’clock in the morning. Like, what was. What was the plan around that? Give us some bit of insight to that morning.

 

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, we planned to do it a long time ago.

 

I can’t remember whose idea it was originally. It might have been. It might have been Sewell’s.

 

But, yeah, the plan was for a while, like, next Anzac Day, if they do another Welcome to Country, which they probably will, let’s do it! And we don’t usually. Like, we didn’t. We weren’t in a big group. We were in some of us aren’t even allowed to associate, so I wasn’t with the boys. Everyone was in little groups and the idea was just, basically just be somewhere in your little. With a few of your mates or with your family members or whatever, whoever you’re going to the Dawn Service with, and if they do a Welcome to Country, or a land acknowledgment or whatever, boo!

 

And obviously her got down there nice and early in the mornings. It was right up the front. And so he was able to be so loud that you could actually hear him through the microphone on the television and broadcast it out or project it out to the larger crowd.

 

So, yeah, we weren’t expecting them to then make it about us. We thought that the impression would just be that the crowd did it and that it would just be like this kind of spontaneous thing. We didn’t necessarily want the credit, but they managed to pin it on us pretty quickly. They have a bunch of police, like, on the shrine with cameras and everything pointed at the crowd, because I’ve been there before for Anzac Day, for Remembrance Day, and there’s a bunch of cops on the shrine with advanced cameras and they’re just like pointing them straight at us and like staring at us the whole time. And we don’t usually do anything. We just stand there and we just attend the service that we leave.

 

We would never come to Anzac Day in uniform and with banners and microphones and megaphones and do any of that kind of thing on Anzac Day because we don’t think it’s appropriate. But what we also don’t think is appropriate is the fucking Welcome to Country! The Welcome to Country, what it fundamentally is a declaration of Aboriginal sovereignty.

 

And obviously we don’t believe in that. We believe in Australian sovereignty and that sovereignty was bled for by the Anzacs in the First World War and it was bled for by other veterans of the Australian military in the Second World War and other wars. So it’s ridiculously inappropriate and obviously the people agree with us, which is why it’s had such a engaging reaction from the public.

 

Host: I have a question on that specific thing. I said this on stream the other day in the fallout. This was my personal opinion. I said that it had to be someone as polarizing as Jacob to do this because the discourse wouldn’t have existed if it was just a random person on any other given day.

 

What are your thoughts on that? Because I think it’s incredible that this has happened and it’s become such a pivotal talking point where the debate last night these guys were asked about it. You know, it’s got a lifespan of over four or five days or four days now. Three, four days. And they constantly talking about it. It was brought up on Sky News every hour all day today, despite the fact that it’s been a few days now. But what are your thoughts on the fact that it. I feel like it had to be someone polarizing to be able to get the discourse and get the ball rolling on the discussion with the broader society.

 

What are your thoughts on that?

 

Joel Davis: I think, yes, I think maybe because this issue is so potent, because it really strikes at the core of like our identity as a nation, like the question what defines us? Is it Aboriginal sovereignty? Is it the so-called first nations culture? Which is utterly contrived by the way, like the Welcome to Country is a modern invention. The dot paintings was literally invented by a White guy and taught to the Aboriginals. Like they don’t actually have much continuity with whatever their culture was before we showed up.

 

There’s been this construction in recent decades of this so-called Aboriginal culture by Marxist academics and so on. And this is part of it.

 

And then they gaslight everyone into it being like some continuous thing. When anyone who’s older than, like, 20 remembers that there wasn’t Welcome to Country at everything when we were growing up. Like, this is a pretty new thing that all of a sudden there’s Welcome to Country at everything. And the media has tried to gaslight everyone as if we’ve always been doing this and this is an ancient tradition and all this bullshit, but everyone knows it’s bullshit, really.

 

But, yeah, I think because of that. And then also the Anzacs. I mean, Australia Day is a big deal because Australia Day is about celebrating British settlement. And obviously we were all over the news on Australia Day as well, and that’s important.

 

[07:31]

 

But the thing is, on Australia Day, what most people are doing is they’re having a barbecue, maybe they go to the beach, have a few beers, and it’s more of a chill, celebrate with your mates and your family kind of day. But Anzac Day isn’t quite like that. Anzac Day, you know, is. It’s more serious because it’s about remembering people who paid the ultimate sacrifice at wartime for our country. So you get up early in the morning, you go to the Dawn Service and you. It’s more. It’s almost like a religious. I’m not going to say almost. It is a religious day for Australians because you are venerating your ancestors. This is an ancient. An ancient tradition of pretty much every civilisation ever to venerate their ancestors. It’s a form of ancestor worship. We’re literally doing prayers to our fallen ancestors.

 

So Anzac Day is a very big deal. It’s the most emotional day for a patriotic Australian in the calendar, as far as your nationalism goes. And people have very strong feelings about it for obvious reasons.

 

And the thing is that back in World War I, 40% of the military kind of like fighting age men in Australia signed up to go and fight in World War I. 40%. It was like over 400,000 men of only about a million fighting age men in the country at that time. And there was no conscription, so that was voluntary. Australia had the highest participation rate of any of the Allied countries in World War I, other than Serbia, who started the war, and all Serbians had to fight.

 

So a lot of Australians served in World War I with the Anzacs, and a lot of Australians served in World War II.

 

And so if you’re an Australian who traces your heritage back to that time, you’re pretty likely to have ancestors that served in one of those two conflicts, particularly in World War I, because the participation rate was so high.

 

So it’s something that’s in our blood as Australians. And you know, people say:

 

“Oh, World War I, it was like a war for it was a war for the British Empire. They were in Gallipoli, they were in France. What does Turkey and France have to do with Australia?”

 

Well, it was a war for Australia because Australia was part of the British Empire and our primary concern was the rising Japanese Empire in the early 20th century. And you can go and read, if you read your history and you read the statements by our prime ministers and our leading politicians at the time, diplomatic conferences, at the Imperial conference with the British and so on, we were constantly bringing up the issue of the Japanese. And the Japanese had defeated the Russians in a war in the 1900s, mid-1900s, just after Australia was federated. And that was a big deal. That was the first time a non-White power had defeated a White power in the modern world. So people were like:

 

“Wow, the Japanese are serious. They could beat the Russians in a war. These are serious mother fuckers!”

 

A few years later, they annexed Korea, they just take Korea and they show that they had an expansionist intent. In the lead up to the First World War, there was a great anxiety in Australia of:

 

“Well, what happens if the British Empire isn’t there to protect us?”

 

So we had to make sure that the British won World War I against the Germans and the other powers allied with the Germans, because if they didn’t and the British Empire collapsed, we were going to be a sitting duck, we thought, potentially for an expansionist Japanese Empire.

 

So that was why Billy Hughes, our Prime Minister during World War I, when he addressed the people, to convince them to sign up to fight in the First World War, to become ANZACs, 65,000 of which died and another almost 150,000 of which were wounded. He had to convince the people to go and fight in France and ultimately in Turkey. And what he said was:

 

“I bid thee go and fight for White Australia in France!”

 

That’s what he said to the people. It was the idea that if we weren’t going to be able to have a wide Australia policy anymore, if the British Empire collapses and the Japanese, you know, invade us and subjugate us.

 

So that was paid for in blood.

 

Obviously the British Empire was one of the victorious powers in the First World War. And the same logic went into the Second World War. When we went to the Second World War, it was the same logic. Australians didn’t go and fight in North Africa and in Southern Europe against the Germans because they were morally repulsed by National Socialism or they were concerned about anti-semitism or [chuckling] anything like that they were simply trying to defend the British Empire because they were concerned about an expansionist Japanese empire which at this point had taken half of China and was really showing that it had a will to dominate the entire region that we were in. Because Japan invaded China in 1933, six years before World War II broke out in Europe.

 

So that’s why we went to war.

 

[12:24]

 

And then as soon as the war with Japan started in 1941 or 1940, then immediately our prime minister said:

 

“We’ve got to bring the boys back!”

 

And he pulled all of our boys out of North Africa, out of fighting the Germans and the Italians and brought them back here to fight the Germans. And the British abandoned us. The British Empire collapsed. They failed in Singapore, they pulled out, they lost Hong Kong, they lost a lot of their territories that they controlled in Asia. The British Navy retreated. They were all focused all their energy on fighting the Germans.

 

And so we pulled our boys out of Europe and said:

 

“Okay, well we’re going to fight, we’re going to fight for Australia here.”

 

And we completely abandoned the war in Europe for the rest of the war to fight here against Japan or in our region and with the Americans who came in on our side.

 

So World War II was about fighting the Japanese Empire and really World War I was about defending ourselves against the Japanese Empire. Both of these wars, the way that was perceived by our politicians and by the public, by the media, by everyone in Australian society was about protecting White Australia in the face of an expanding yellow empire. And even you could say the wars in Korea and in Vietnam that were then for in the 50s and the 60s, obviously that was in the Cold War paradigm against communism.

 

But it was a similar concern of like, if communism rips through Asia, eventually they’re going to have their designs on Australia.

 

And so what motivated Australians to go and fight in Korea and in Vietnam was a very similar motivation. Even though the concern wasn’t the Japanese this time, it was instead the communist powers of Asia expanding. And that’s the threat that faces us today. When we think about what would World War Three be, would probably be an American led alliance against China and that we’d be involved in that as well. And that’s what’s being prepared for basically right now by our political class.

 

So that’s the geopolitical context that in which we fought.

 

And the reason why we were going and fighting in places like Iraq and Afghanistan was because America is our partner from a geopolitical standpoint against an ascendant China. And we wanted to maintain the favour of the Americans now that the British Empire has collapsed after the Second World War. So all of Australia’s foreign policy can be understood in those terms and their sacrifices can be understood in those terms. And we can have our criticisms. The British Empire, it was taken over by jewish bankers and commercial interests and it had many flaws. And the American Empire definitely is taken over by jewish bankers and commercial interests and has exceptional flaws and is also responsible for using its soft power in our country to subvert our political system and bring us into this neo-liberal shitscape that we now live in. But that’s nevertheless the case. That was, that was what the logic was behind a lot of these wars and why these men were fighting.

 

And so when we venerate their sacrifice, we’re venerating the basis upon which Australian sovereignty is even possible. And whatever criticisms you have of the various wars, and I have criticisms, I don’t think we should have been in Iraq, that was a war for Israel. I don’t think we should have been in Afghanistan, that was completely irrelevant to our national interests and so on.

 

But that nevertheless, and obviously I don’t think that we should have gone to war against the Germans. I think there was a complete failure for the British Empire which ended up collapsing due to prosecuting that war against its interests when the Germans didn’t even want war with the British Empire. In fact, they wanted peace. And that’s well documented.

 

Host: I just saw a hilarious comment. Sorry, I saw a hilarious comment. Don’t let Joel monologue for two hours. He won’t stop unless he interrupts him. Let’s go back. Let’s go, let’s go back to this.

 

So it’s interesting because I think that this, like I said from my original question, this course wouldn’t have happened with regards to the last three days, the longevity of this event at the Anzac Day Dawn Service if it wasn’t someone as polarizing as Jacob. Now one thing that I wanted to bring up, which I thought was just absolutely unbelievable and it actually just proved us all right. It was stunning when I saw this morning.

 

So this was actually, I posted this at 6:30 in the morning the other day because it was this, it was so outrageous! I have been documenting that the anti-vilification amendments that you guys are so against as well and I think rightfully everyone else is against it.

 

The fact that the Victorian government actually sought legal advice to see if they could prosecute what Jacob had done that day. It’s come out, I think it was yesterday that they couldn’t lay charges. They wanted to summons him for some sort of charge that they wanted to make up like they did with your stunt at in Adelaide on, was it Australia Day.

 

But I don’t think it’s landed anything. I don’t think there’s a charge that’s landed yet. But let’s roll this.

 

Joel Davis: Oh no, I’ve been charged from Adelaide. A lot of us are still fighting it in the courts.

 

Host: Yeah, but I’m talking about, I’m just saying this.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Host: Nothing stuck.

 

Joel Davis: My understanding is that he hasn’t been charged. The police, I understand, said to Jacob that he could expect a summons over an offensive behaviour charge. But that’s different than the anti-vilification.

 

[17:44]

 

Host: Yeah. Let’s roll this. And then I want to get your thoughts on what said.

 

So this is more of a news sort of commentary on it. It’s not any one politician talking about it.

 

But I think it’s interesting because it’s basically vindicated that they’re going to try to use it to prosecute anyone that tries to be pro-Australia in any which way. It’s not going to be used to prosecute anyone that offends the Indians or the jewish community. These, these laws in my opinion were amended in response to a hoax and then a whole bunch of other criminal offences that were done by organised crime. We spoke about this the other time on stream and then all of a sudden it’s come out that they’ve passed these laws on the back of a hoax and now there’s an investigation to see if we can repeal them, at least in New South Wales. Victoria, I’m not so sure that’s going to happen. But let’s roll this and then we’ll talk about it. Hopefully the audio works.

 

Let me just make sure. Unmuted. Okay. Can you hear it?

 

Joel Davis: No.

 

Host: Okay, let me just. I think I might have to reshare the reshare the screen.

 

Let me just quickly switch back.

 

Sky News: Protests at yesterday’s Anzac Day service in Melbourne are unlikely to meet the criminal threshold under Victorian anti-vilification laws. Convicted neo-Nazi Jacob Hersant led boos and chanting during the Welcome to Country according to the Age. Government and legal sources don’t believe the booing constitutes punishment under Hate Speech laws. The neo-Nazi disruptions during the Anzac Day Dawn Service at Melbourne Shrine of Remembrance have been condemned.

 

Host: Yeah, so, yeah, so they’re just talking about the fact that they’ve tried to see if they can prosecute Jacob under the new Hate Speech laws, the anti-vilification amendment. So what are your thoughts on the fact that you guys are being, you’re the primary example of basically all of these laws that they’ve passed over the last three months now. And it’s just so happened to be under the, like the consequential, the, it’s the consequence of these things happening to you guys now is off the back of being pro-Australia.

 

What are your thoughts on that?

 

And do you think that it’s probably no surprise, but is it a surprise that you guys are like exhibit A on the chopping block for this, for these laws?

 

Joel Davis: No, it’s not a surprise. I think we’re probably within a national context the most high profile Nazis on the planet today. Maybe the Azov Battalion in Ukraine, you could say are more high profile.

 

But in terms of like the general political discourse of a country, most places they just kind of ignore people like us. But probably, I would say partly due to the type of activism that we do, which is particularly provocative and interesting to people, but also due to a hysterical political class, they kind of fixate upon us in a very intense way. And anytime we do anything in public, apparently we need to be. The police have to do something. There’s all this pressure from communists, from Left-wing journalists that are secretly communists or maybe not so secretly communists and from jewish groups and so on to come after us. And you know, obviously it’s ridiculous!

 

But when it comes to this, it has to be said the anti-vilification laws that were passed recently in Victoria actually aren’t in effect yet. They don’t go into effect until September.

 

So they’re talking about the old anti-vilification laws. The ones that go into effect in September are so broad it’s hard to know exactly how far they could go. So I guess we’re going to have to wait and see after September how that goes.

 

So that’s part of the reason why they couldn’t prosecute. The same reason why I still haven’t been charged even though they raided my house and took my stuff and said I was under investigation for vilification when I did the jews Hate Freedom rally. Because under the old laws, there’s a political speech exemption and there’s a much higher threshold that needs to be met for what constitutes vilification. Under the new laws that have been passed but aren’t in effect until September on a criminal basis. Basically they can just say that, well, Aboriginals are offended or jews are offended or whoever the supposed group being targeted is offended. And so at that point, you know, who knows how broad that’s going to be. We’re going to have to wait and see until it goes through the courts, I guess.

 

I don’t think the laws are constitutional. They removed the political speech exemption that was originally in the originally proposed laws at the behest of the Liberal Party. A Liberal Party requested that at the behest of the jewish lobby. They said we’re not going to support these laws unless you remove the political speech exemption. Which is what makes the laws constitutional because we have a constitutional right to political communication.

 

But yeah, there’s no equivalent, there’s no like equivalent exemption in the new laws. They’ve been completely removed. Liberal Party ended up voting against them because for some other reason.

 

But basically they just kept the political speech or they kept the kind of removal of the political speech exemption out of the, out of the legislation. So the legislation in my opinion is unconstitutional. We’re going to test it in the courts.

 

But basically there is no exemptions other than the so-called Sam Kerr exemption which, …

 

Host: Yeah, I gathered that.

 

[23:35]

 

Joel Davis: Which was discussed. Yeah, which was discussed in the media, which is that, well if you’re of a so-called disadvantaged group and you vilify a so-called advantaged group, meaning if you’re non-White and you talk shit about White people or maybe if you’re a homosexual and you talk shit about straight people or something, then apparently you can say whatever you want. And that was the Greens asked for that and then Labor put that in order to get the Greens vote to get the law passed despite not having the support of the Liberals. So total shit show! But that’s the laws. So again they’re not in effect yet.

 

But yeah, under the current laws, like I said, he might still get charged with offensive behaviour, which is a really vague law and we’ll see if that goes to court.

 

But it’s a very minor charge that doesn’t have. The anti-vilification laws are very serious with like multiple year jail terms, whereas the offensive behaviour charges, a very weak summary offence that it’s on, you’re unlikely to do jail time for. So they might not even bother because they don’t think it’s worth their time and energy to go after him for it. Maybe they will. We’ll see. I haven’t heard that he’s been charged yet. I’m sure it’ll be publicized if that does happen.

 

Host: Yeah, yesterday that they’re unlikely to charge. And you’re right to. I think you’re right to have reminded me. I remember I saw what’s his name from Victoria, the Libertarian MP. He was actually there until four in the morning. They passed just like they passed the amendments in New South Wales at like 4 or 5 o’clock in the morning. So even I was unaware that they were actually. They actually re tabled it to get these laws passed.

 

But one thing they did bring up in his video, he said that they don’t come into law until later this year. So there’s enough time for people going into the election next year in Victoria to at least experience it so they can say:

 

“Oh, maybe we need to push out the Labor government and then hopefully Liberal Party has enough seats in the upper and lower house to be able to repeal it.”

 

Joel Davis: There’s no way the Liberal Party will repeal it because the Liberal Party in Victoria are totally controlled by the jewish lobby more than any other state in Australia. I mean they’re controlled nationally but the jewish community is particularly, politically, active and hysterical in Melbourne and they have a vice grip over the Liberal Party. Like I said the Liberal Party refused to vote for this originally because it was too lenient on people who were engaging in political speech. Because obviously the jews want to basically ban anyone from engaging in political speech that they don’t like that’s critical of Israel or the jewish lobby or the jewish community. And so they asked for that to be removed and they got it.

 

And then they started going on about a very, like a small kind of piece of minutiae in the law. They didn’t actually oppose it in principle in any meaningful way. And they could then go to the people and pretend that they opposed it.

 

But if you followed it closely like I did, you would realise that they’re scum! Like they’re complete frauds, they’re liars! And I fucking hate the Liberal Party! We’re not going to get anything from voting Liberal Party back in Victoria that we want. We won’t. There will be a complete disappointment.

 

What is necessary in Australian politics is for Right-wingers to completely defect from the Liberal Party and start voting for the Right-wing minor parties.

 

And right now in Australian politics, supposedly the centre line is drawn between Liberal and Labor. But Liberal and Labor are the same! There is barely any distinction of meaning, a meaningful distinction between these two parties. We need to redraw the line between Liberal and the rest.

 

Host: So the election’s coming up on Saturday, right? You would have thought that Peter Dutton would be so empowered off the back of all of those firebombings, the graffiti all over the joint, the, what was it called, the synagogue being burnt down in Melbourne and then all of these laws being passed in response to it and the caravan in New South Wales in general.

 

You would have thought that off, just off the back of that. And then Sky News broadcasted a massive anti-semitism Summit that Peter Dutton would be supercharged and empowered off the back of that he would be a dollar three favourite by the bookies to win! Just off the back of all of those consequential series of events.

 

You know, that was like a five month lead up going into this election where he had all of that galvanised support from the jewish community, from the lobby groups and the sentiment in the public sentiment was there as well. How come he’s not winning off the back of that? I’m curious to know what you think of that because you would have thought that that would be the circumstances that he would face him.

 

But right now he’s basically given up. I think just. I watched an interview that he just did with Shari Marks and no surprise there, they’re trying to revive the campaign in the last three days before Saturday.

 

But yeah, what are your thoughts on that? Because I would think that off the back of the last five, six months, he’d steamroll Albo because of the sentiment was there, the public sentiment there. The laws were passed. He was the face of it in terms of the political leadership.

 

But you know, his trending is gonna be probably getting spilled as leader maybe if he loses quite convincingly on Saturday.

 

[29:18]

 

Joel Davis: I mean, his seat, the seat of Dixon, which is his seat in Brisbane. He only won by less than 2% margin in the last election and I could see him potentially losing there, particularly if the Trumpet of Patriots voters turn on him as they’ve been instructed to by the Trumpet of Patriots controversial how to vote cards.

 

But yeah, the story is a few things.

 

Number one, have you noticed how since the election was called, they really kind of shut up about the jews, like the first day or two, they made sure that they went to the synagogue and you know, showed the jews that they were on their side.

 

But obviously they focus grouped it and realised that it was incredibly unpopular with the general public. The general public are not interested in Israel. They don’t care about Israel, they don’t care about the jewish community and they don’t support taking away our freedom of speech. And they’re sick of hearing about anti-semitism. So they completely shut up about that.

 

Host: Since the election campaign, they’ve barely brought it up. I think you’re right. They’ve only brought it up maybe once or twice at the early days of the election. They have not brought it up once since. Nothing!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the Liberal Party had all the momentum before they started passing all these attacks on free speech. That was when they had the momentum late last year. October, November, December, they looked like it was inevitable. It seemed like Albanese was done, Labor were done. The election was going to have to be called soon. And when it was going to be called, they weren’t going to have a hope.

 

And then the Liberal Party decided to champion the cause of the jews and the cause of freedom of speech. And obviously labour were just as complicit in all of this. But I think that turned off a lot of their base.

 

And the story of this election has not been labour accumulating a great degree of popularity. Labor has, they’ve increased the Indian vote, they’ve increased the immigrant vote. And immigrants, particularly Indians, love voting labour and so that’s bolstering the Labor vote. But the real story of this election is how the Liberals have lost votes to the Right. The Right-wing minor party vote is going to be higher than ever before this election in Australian history. I saw a news poll the other day that had One Nation polling over 10%. And that’s not even including all the other parties that Rennicks, People First Party, they’ll probably do decent. Trump and the Patriots will get some votes. The Libertarians will get some votes. The Family first, the Shooters and Fishers and so on. It could add up to about 20% quite feasibly in this election.

 

So what Dutton and the Liberals have done have completely lost their own base and justifiably so. I’ve never seen such strong public sentiment on being against the Uni-Party and so many Right-wing attacks on the Liberals. And the Liberals have failed dismally to win us over, basically. People like you and I who are obviously, kind of obviously we don’t have the same ideology but we’re in this kind of populist right kind of milieu. We’re not being won over. And this is in the context of in European politics, conservative parties in like basically every European country have shrunk and have become dwarfed by populist parties that are kind of attacking them from the Right. In almost every European country.

 

Obviously in America, we’ve seen Trump kind of railroad his agenda into the Republican Party where 10 years ago Trump seemed like a radical and an outsider. Now he’s a normal Republican. The Republican Party has been remade in his image and obviously I’m not a Trump supporter and it’s nowhere near enough the changes that have been made, but it’s clearly a step in the direction of populism and away from what conservatism was in the standard, you know, early 2010s conception.

 

Liberal Party, however, have not changed. They have completely maintained the trajectory that conservatism was on before this kind of populist backlash. They haven’t adapted to it at all! They’ve cucked on every single issue! They I was watching your coverage actually of the debate last night and it was the first debate I watched between Albanese and Dutton because honestly, life is too short. But I thought it’d be interesting because I wanted to see if they would talk about the booing on Anzac Day. And they did. I was interested to hear what they would have to say. But there was one point where Dutton attacked Albanese on immigration when they were talking about housing and he said:

 

“Oh, this Labor government have increased immigration by 70% on what it was before Covid and blah, blah, blah. So we’re going to cut immigration by 25%!”

 

And it’s like:

 

“Hey, wait a second!”

 

So we have like ridiculously over the top immigration. We have a historic housing crisis. It’s caused by immigration. No matter what anyone says. It’s the case. In Canada they had a similar housing crisis and the Left-wing government party in power cut immigration to Net Zero. Imagine if Labor a year ago cut immigration to Net Zero to try and like win voters back from the coalition. That’s basically what happened in Canada and it’s kind of worked for them. It looks like they’re going to win the Canadian election, which is coming up very shortly as well.

 

Host: Yeah, but I just saw a story on that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but the conservatives here basically have accepted according all the mainstream news and they’ve finally accepted after we’ve been arguing with them for years. That immigration is causing the housing crisis! It’s not that we’re not building enough houses. Australia builds more houses per capita than any other Western country except I think Switzerland. So why do we have a housing crisis? Because we have the highest rate of immigration per capita of almost any Western country. That’s why. It’s obvious, it’s demand.

 

[35:08]

 

Host: I don’t know if you saw this story, but this came. This was in the news today. I only just heard about it a couple of hours ago.

 

So they’re apparently bumping up the student visa fees by, I think it was like $400 per, per application.

 

And then there’s going to be approximately like, I think it was about half a million people had applied for it. Let me see if I can find the number. And then only like a quarter of a million. Only a quarter of a million people came to Australia on student visas. And this is just student visas.

 

So not only are they still letting in between 250,000 to half a million depending on how many students show up, they’re bumping up the price of it so they can make more revenue off the back of it. This was hidden in the Labor budget and only just came out in the news today.

 

Joel Davis: But look at this. Labor has promised to cap international student commencements at 270,000, while the opposition has said it will be 240,000. That’s like, what even is the fucking point? Yeah, what even is the point? Like, Liberals could have just lied and pretended that they were going to cut immigration and then just like what Albanese did. Albanese lied before the last election about immigration and then just opened the floodgates. They could have just lied and won, but they’re that in the pocket of the property lobby.

 

The number one industry in Australia that donates to political parties is the property lobby. I talked about this in my article in The Noticer on why we should put the Liberals last this election. And the largest recipient of property lobby property industry donations is the Liberal Party.

 

So if the Labor Party is willing to bring in this many immigrants and the property industry still thinks they get a better deal with Liberal than Labor, that goes to show that they’re pretty confident that the Liberals aren’t going to cut immigration by any significant degree. The number one donor to the Liberal Party is Harry Triguboff, Australia’s richest property developer. He’s a jew as well, by the way. He runs Meriton or his company, Meriton Properties or whatever.

 

So that’s why that’s why basically The Liberals have lost this election because they care more about getting money from the property lobby than about actually winning elections. They would rather lose the election and get that sweet property bucks in the pocket. Trump lied and campaign on an issue that they could easily win on, which is just cutting immigration.

 

Host: Do you think Trump lied with these policy of mass deportations then? Because the numbers don’t stack up, at least at the moment.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it seems, yeah, of course. Seems like he lied, but that’s normal. That’s these cuckservative leaders always lie. But the Liberals are that in the pocket of these donors. They didn’t even have the temerity to lie. That’s how pathetic it is.

 

I mean, I talked about this in the we need to understand the Liberal Party are a Left-wing party. They’re not a Right-wing party. Give me one conservative policy that they have. They literally kicked someone out of the party the other day because he said that women shouldn’t be in combat roles in the army. I mean,

 

Host: I posted about that.

 

Joel Davis: That’s insane! What, like what are their other policies? It was a Liberal Party that legalised gay marriage. It was the Liberal Party in the 1970s that made multiculturalism official state policy in Australia. Under, in the late 70s. It was the Liberal Party that took away our guns. In the 90s, it was a Liberal Party that opened up the floodgates to mass immigration to these insane levels that we’ve been receiving in, under Howard. It was Howard that really opened it up. So Liberal Party again and again and again has been at the forefront of all these Left-wing agendas that are destroying our country that conservatives hate. If they keep voting Liberal. It’s like, when are you going to realise that these guys are your enemies? Stop voting for them!

 

Host: Yeah. And just like this video here, it gives ammunition, easy ammunition for the Labor Party to be able to use these talking points to galvanise their support.

 

So this video is from a couple weeks ago. Now Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has once again taken aim at the Liberal Party candidates, slamming one for blaming the Illuminati for Australia’s downfall, another for claiming, claiming feminists caused Donald Trump’s 2020 election loss. And Benjamin Britton, the candidate that you’re talking about, for saying that women shouldn’t serve on the front lines of the ADF. I’ll play the video because like I was saying just a second ago, it just gives them easy talking points to target the Liberal Party and just keep on firing at them and galvanizing their support off the back of it.

 

Albanese: And this week if we look at the seats that we are hoping to be successful in, they include Leichhardt with Matt Smith and you compare it with the other mob. I mean they’ve got candidates, they got a candidate for the Senate here who’s connected up with Illuminati rubbish! I mean that is who they are running in seats. They got a bloke in Queensland in Leichardt in a held LMP seat who’s a cooker who blames feminists for U. S election results. What is he saying? Women shouldn’t vote? I mean these people have selected shockers. They had to get rid of their candidate in Whitlam because he came out with all sorts of theories about women not running, not being allowed to be in combat forces.

 

Host: So yeah, it just, it just gives them easy talking points to target the Liberal Party and you know, my sort of knowledge and experience around these like this political commentary space is only just begun from the top of Covid.

 

But I think that it’s just embarrassing to see the Liberal Party leadership.

 

[41:12]

 

Joel Davis: Just how out of touch are these people? Do they really think that people want women serving on the front lines? Like that’s insane! Like Albanese is talking about it like oh these crazy lunatics, these fascist, you know, conspiracy theorists that think women shouldn’t be on the front lines in war. Like what? Like wasn’t that only changed like a few years ago? And it’s insane! Like what you think women aren’t going to vote for you unless you, unless you let them go and fight on the front lines in war. Women don’t want to do that! It’s ridiculous! It’s like this Welcome to Country thing. They were talking down to us and to the Australian people like oh like these crazy extremists that are against the Welcome to Country. We all support that. And then it’s like no we don’t. [chuckling] The average Australian does not support any of this nonsense! And the Liberal Party are so out of touch. They think the crap that they say on the media on even on Sky News, they think that this journalist Canberra, inner city Sydney and Melbourne bubble reflects what Australians, like normal Australians think and feel. These people are completely out of touch and they’re a minority.

 

But instead of actually trying to appeal to the average Aussie battler, the kind of person who would actually vote for a proper Right-wing candidate, instead they’re trying to chase after these like Teal seats or something in the inner cities and appeal to like deranged, you know, rich Boomer women who like watch the ABC all day! And it’s like, why are you chasing these lunatics? Go after your actual base. But it just shows they’re not actually a Right-wing party. They don’t give a shit about any of the values that we have. And they need to be treated as a Left-wing party and we need to give our support to the actual Right-wing parties that are, that exist. They’re not perfect.

 

I don’t think Rennick or the policies with Trumpeter Patriots are perfect. They don’t go anywhere near far enough obviously for my liking. But they do seem like as if they’re actually genuinely decent policies that would make the country better. That if the Liberal Party adopted the same policies, they would probably win. It would win on those policies. The only reason these smaller parties aren’t able to compete yet is because people are so stuck in the red team, blue team dichotomy, they think they have to pick one of these two options.

 

Host: So let’s talk about party politics. So I’ve got this article from the other day. I think this was just yesterday that I had up before here. So it goes:

 

“Neo-Nazis quietly forming a political party to try to get around the law.”

 

The interesting thing about this article and this story is the fact that they want to try to close the loopholes that they’re accusing you guys of trying to exploit in being able to have the political freedom of association. Now I’ve just looked it up here:

 

“An eligible member when registering a political party with the AA C is someone who doesn’t legally count towards 1, 500 minimum members and then an ineligible member type.”

 

So I’m just trying to find ones that wouldn’t, that would probably hinder you guys, because I’m interested to see how they would stop you.

 

So at the moment the “ineligible member types” is someone that’s not enrolled. It’s a duplicate member. Fake or false member. Underage person, dead person. The details are wrong. You’ve withdrawn consent. Which means if someone tells the AC I’m not a member during the membership audit, they will be disqualified. Non Australian citizens and members of the registered parties.

 

So it looks like unless you, as long as you follow all of those requirements, the there’s currently no loopholes that they’re accusing you of that they can not approve your application.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but they even say in this article that experts agree that they can’t stop us.

 

Host: Yeah, so that’s what I want to get to. So let’s talk about that.

 

So what’s the idea behind that? Because I think it’s interesting that you guys want to do this, not because you want to form a party and take a stab at politics. I think it’s more interesting the commentary behind it. So what you were just saying before, the fact that they’re going to try to shut you down and breach the Constitution for you because you know, you guys have the right to be able to do this. You’re not breaching any of these requirements from what I can tell. This is probably the only requirement that I would see that would be that they would try to drag, drag you through the mud having ineligible members because you guys are so, you know, polarizing in the eyes of the government, the eyes of the AEC, perhaps.

 

Joel Davis: They can’t, they don’t have a legal basis to do that.

 

And actually there’s strong High Court precedent and constitutional precedent on that they can’t ban political parties in this country. If you follow the reasonable, very reasonable, apolitical, necessarily apolitical requirements of the Electoral act and the AEC regulations, which are very reasonable and basic. And you just basically need your 1500 members. They can’t stop you. They tried to ban the Communist party in the 1950s. They weren’t allowed to by the High Court. They then had a referendum. They asked the Australian people, can you give us the authority to ban political parties? And the Australian people, at the height of the Cold War, when everyone hated Communism, they said:

 

“No, we don’t want to give the government that ability!”

 

And they maintained that anyone can form a political party in this country. Then in the early 1970s, multiple National Socialist political parties were formed and contested elections. There’s precedent.

 

[46:59]

 

Host: So what about these two requirements? So not genuinely a political party. If the group is truly organised for a political party example, it’s a sham front. They can reject it. What if they say to you:

 

“Oh, you guys are just trying to exploit these loopholes, so we’re going to reject it.”

 

Joel Davis: They are going have to prove that in court. We actually want to. We actually think we can get people elected. We believe we got good candidates and we’ve got a compelling campaign strategy. We think we can get people into Parliament and we want to have a crack. Like, we actually think a lot of people would vote for us. We think we’ve got great policies that no one else is offering and that we’re interesting. I think there’s a lot of Australians that are just completely fed up with this political system that will go:

 

“Fuck it! I’m voting Nazi!”

 

You know, like I think there is a market for us out there.

 

Host: What about this requirement? So your party name must not copy, resemble or cause confusion with the existing political party. And then prohibited words as well. What if they turn around, say the National Socialist, words, those., …

 

Joel Davis: We’re not gonna, we’re not going to register at the National Socialist Network. That’s not what the name of the party will be. And that’s not our intent. We’re not going to register as a National Socialist with National socials in the name of the party. That’s not the name. And yeah, you can’t register a party that has. But even so, I don’t think they could actually ban. If you wanted to register National Socialists. I don’t think they could. I don’t think they have grounds like to say that’s offensive because it’s not like, it’s not. You’d have to like have like a swear word in the name or something crazy! Which obviously we wouldn’t do. That’s insane! So I think we’ll be fine.

 

And at the end of the day if they knock back one name, we’ll just come up with another name. Like there’s a point at which like legally they got no leg to stand on. They’re just going to have to let us get registered.

 

And what I would say is, well, to the system is, isn’t that what you want us to do? Haven’t you been saying like you’re against extremism and you don’t want political violence and all this kind of stuff? Okay, well we’re trying to just be law abiding and participate in the political process like everyone else and form our party and let the people decide. If they don’t want to vote for us, they don’t have to. If they do, they can. We’re living a liberal democracy. Isn’t that what you want? Don’t you want us trying to work within the system and do things the right way, the legal way? What happens if you don’t let us form a party? Well, number one, you’re going to de-legitimize, you’re going to break the Constitution, we’re going to beat you in High Court.

 

So you’re going to give us a huge High Court victory when we beat you and force you to let us have a political party and something going to promote the party even more and get us even more votes. So go right ahead and do that.

 

But second of all, you’re also going to basically de-legitimize the system that we don’t actually have a liberal democracy to everyone. And number three, what the ASIO have said, what Mike Burgess has said, the head of ASIO when they grill him in the Senate kind of inquiries and so on about us and about extremism, is that the likelihood of extremism coming from the so-called, you know, White supremacist far-Right, whatever spectrum is not people from us, not people from our organisation, but people who become demoralised, who think that there’s no chance for us to have any effect in politics, there’s no chance at political victory, or a political solution that sit there and engage in some kind of lone wolf attack because they just sit there stewing and feeling black pilled and then do something stupid. That’s what Mike Burgess said many years in a row is the greatest threat. So let us give them something to believe in. They won’t commit a terrorist attack because they’ll think:

 

“Well, we’ve got, here’s a potentially a political solution. We’ve got the party, we’ve got the boys running, got campaigns. I can get involved, I can do, I can be a productive member of civil society and I can argue my case, my reasonable, rational case for my views in the public square.”

 

That’s supposedly the system that we have. So just let, like, let us participate. If you don’t like us, don’t vote for us like anyone else.

 

Host: And they, I’m just looking up here, it’s quite interesting. So Jordan McSweeney, which I know it’s kind of strange, but this is Jordan McSweeney, this young, these people, …

 

Joel Davis: Jordan McSweeney is a full on communist, this is a full on communist far-Left lunatic extremist! And they will him out as an expert. Imagine if I became an expert on the far-Left and the media started interviewing me about the Greens and Antifa and Victorian socialists and I was like:

 

“Oh, I’m an expert on communism!”

 

And I went into the media and started like, just attacking them in the media as an expert. That’s basically what these people are like. They’re not experts, they’re activists!

 

[51:42]

 

Host: Yeah, but well that’s what I’m saying. Like just off the back of his profile, Jordan McSweeney researches the FAR right with a focus on the organisation and communication of far-Right parties. And movements. He’s the author of Far Right Political Parties in Australia. His work has been published. Blah, blah, blah. Jordan is a senior research fellow at the centre of Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance at the University of Canberra. So it’s no surprise that he resides in Canberra. But going to the article, it’s he proves your point for all he’s worth. Jordan McSweeney who researches the far-Right in Australia expects if the group does clear the 1500 member threshold it will be approved as a registered party. But standing up candidates to drive real political change is unlikely to be their main game.

 

So that’s up to debate. You’ve just given your opinion on that. But he even says that as long as you have 1500 ballot members it’s not like they’re going to be able to stop you because you do meet those requirements. I can’t see at least from what I’ve read here any reason why they could. That’s why I brought up every reason that they could possibly do it focusing on the members side of things because I think if anything they’re going to try to target you guys individually like they have already.

 

So let’s talk about the election. I mean I don’t really have too much to say off it. I’ve put out how to vote cards because I just wanted to put out a resource there and just say hey, this is what we think would possibly give provide us with the best possible outcome.

 

But from what I’ve done over the last couple of years with the streams specifically we’ve all realised there’s been a big learning curve for me just how valuable the Senate is and getting the best possible candidates in the Senate to stop these laws passing.

 

What are your thoughts on like this week, this is the final week of the election. What are your thoughts on the actual election itself, the campaign, the campaign strategies of both parties? And do you have support for anyone in particular one candidate or any particular party going into Saturday?

 

Joel Davis: Well, what I’ve already said is that I think if you’re in Queensland you should put Gerard Rennick number one. I think he has, I think he’s the best option that is likely to get realistic, that could get elected. I think basically wherever you are you should put all the Right-wing minor parties first before you put any of the other preferences. Do not put the Liberal Party above any other Right-wing parties. Now my personal view is that the Liberal Party should be put last. I would vote everyone and personally I’ll be voting everyone ahead of the Liberal Party. We’re putting them dead last in both houses.

 

And the reason for this is that I think they need to be punished. They are traitors. Labor, the Greens, everyone who has their head screwed on understands the problem with the Left-wing parties and that they’re not our friends and that they’re working against us. But what Australians need to see is they need to see the Liberal Party losing support and the Right-wing minor parties gaining as much support relatively as possible.

 

So they start to believe in the ability of the Right-wing minor parties or some combination of them to rise up and take the Right-wing vote off a Liberal Party. And that’s going to take multiple election cycles. But that needs to be our objective.

 

And so we need to start working towards that by basically sabotaging the Liberals as much as possible and destroying them as much as possible to create space for the further Right parties to rise.

 

And then we could have a coalition of further Right parties that will actually be far more responsive to our concerns, that’ll be, that’ll have far better policies that will actually fight and take on the Left and it’d be much better for the country. And I want our party to be one of the parties in that coalition. That’s an objective that we have maybe in the coming decade or so. like I said earlier, we need to redraw the line, the centre line from between Liberal and Labor to between the Liberals and the Right-wing minor parties. That’s what we need to start to draw our friend-enemy, distinction.

 

So I think, yeah, in Queensland put Rennick number one. I would say in New South Wales. I like Greg Kelly. Not everything he does I agree with. I was upset at him some of his remarks the other day and I get upsetting him from time to time.

 

But I think he’s a pretty good candidate and I think you should put him number one in New South Wales, considering the other options.

 

But yeah, in general, generally speaking, whatever state you’re in, just put the Right-wing minor parties at the top. I don’t think One Nation deserves to be at the top of your ballot, because One Nation are the most acquiescent of all the Right-wing minor parties to the Liberal Party. They created a preference deal that will help the Liberals get elected in a lot of seats. They never attacked the Liberal Party. Pauline Hanson has openly stated this election cycle that she wants Peter Dutton to become prime minister.

 

[56:40]

 

And I think that One Nation there’s a lot of reasons to think that it’s actually a front, a Liberal Party front. I’ve been saying this for years. The James Ashby, the homosexual who’s Pauline Hanson’s right hand man, who basically runs the party, in all intents and purposes, he is from the Liberal Party. His claim to fame was being the sexual assault victim of Peter Slipper. So he’s having gay sex in the Liberal Party and then defects from the Liberal Party and then now he’s basically running the One Nation Party. I don’t really trust him. I think he’s probably an agent of the Liberal Party dirty tricks department, which is a real department that exists.

 

So I don’t trust him. And I don’t trust the One Nation Party. And when the rubber hit the road over Christmas time, when they were attacking our freedom of speech, where was Pauline Hanson? Where was Malcolm Roberts? They were sitting on their hands saying, doing nothing.

 

Meanwhile the Libertarians were fighting, Ralph Babet was fighting. And he’s not technically Trumpet of Patriots, but basically is. He was fighting the other Right-wing minor parties. Rennick was fighting.

 

And so I think they should be rewarded because they were actually standing up for us when it actually mattered. Even though it was futile. They were standing up when no one else was. And One Nation said and did nothing. They took the L. And then Malcolm Roberts goes before one of these Senate committees and I saw a clip of this and he decides to ask our intelligence, the heads of our intelligence agencies and police agencies, not what is going on with these false flag hoaxes that seem to be connected to the state of Israel as foreign state actor. You know, Rennick was calling that out. He was calling out the Mossad, he was calling out the false flags. So was Babbitt. What was Malcolm Roberts doing? Malcolm Roberts was saying:

 

“Oh, what are we going to do about all these anti-semitic attacks against jews?”

 

So he’s in the pocket of the jews and the Zionists. And I think One Nation are in general.

 

Whereas I see more dynamism from these other Right-wing minor parties, more independents. Trumpet of Patriots. I didn’t like the name, I didn’t like the approach. I don’t think that Suellen is very personable. Whoever’s running it. She seems like an AI bot. Their logo seems like it’s AI generated.

 

Host: What definitely is AI generated. The logo.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Everything seems AI generated and then they just there’s something inauthentic about it. But I’ve been actually kind of slowly won over. Their policies are pretty decent. Their messaging has become decent in recent weeks. They’ve been taking on the Liberal Party and attacking the Liberal Party, attacking the Uni-Party.

 

And I think that’s fantastic! That’s what we want to see from the populist Right-wing. We want them taking on the Uni-Party rather than being a kind of preference capture for people that are kind of further to the right of the Liberal Party. And so I’ve been impressed with them. I think they deserve to go above One Nation.

 

Rennick, very impressed. Great policies. Intelligent man’s smartest man in the Senate. He’s got good nationalist policies. Seems to be a man of integrity. I don’t agree with him on everything. I think he’s too soft on mass immigration and things like that. But he’s still a restrictionist and he’s solid on free speech. He’s solid on nationalist policy across the board. And he called out Israeli and jewish influence at the decisive point. And you think he proved that he’s a genuine actor.

 

Host: Yeah, I think the most important thing with these guys and I’ve backed these guys as well, I actually voted for Craig Kelly myself in New South Wales.

 

But with regards to One Nation specifically, just I’ve got here, you know, Pauline Hanson’s One Nation is just behind the Greens at the moment in terms of party percentage coming into this election.

 

And I think our strategy with at least our how to vote cards and most of the how to vote cards that are out there from independent sources like us, the strategy behind putting them there is just making sure that we get people that are actually going to have the best chance to win! Like in the Hunter, you’ve got. What’s his name?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I mean, in the Lower house, if you’ve got a One Nation, like a lot of the lower house seats don’t have that many candidates. Most seats are not going to have a Rennick candidate.

 

But yeah, in the Hunter seat in Newcastle, I saw that the One Nation is polling great there. Like I would put them one there because it’d be better for them to win, obviously.

 

Host: Yeah, so that’s what I’m getting at.

 

So our strategy was, despite the fact that One Nation has lots of flaws that you’ve just laid out, we want to put the best possible candidate up that we know that has the best possible chance of actually winning.

 

And I think it’s just a matter of getting them to be responsive like the Craig Kelly’s, like the Gerard Rennicks. Because I think one valuable thing that these guys do that other candidates and other politicians don’t do is that they don’t respond to us. They’ve made themselves very valuable to our grievances and to at least have some sort of discourse.

 

Even if they don’t change their mind or even if they just decide not I’m stuck on this side this idea or this policy, at least they’re responsive. Other politicians, …

 

Joel Davis: Absolutely!

 

[1:02:03]

 

Host: They either don’t give us a chance or we have to force a chance our way. We have to you know, throw like literally like the guys over the last few weeks, like Lawrence from what’s news. He had to literally throw himself into lion’s den at that Medicare press conference and just say:

 

“Hey, what the fuck’s going on with the 1.8 million people that you’re bringing in through the immigration policy over the next five years?”

 

But yeah, I think that’s the most valuable thing.

 

So let’s see what happens. We’ve got the best candidates up from One Nation and everywhere else we want to try to stack the Senate because the most important thing in my eyes is to stop these policies getting through to become law. I really think that if the, if the Senate is still in a position where they have a majority the Liberal-Labour more labour than not at least from up current current trends, they’re going to start bringing back the misinformation Bill again. It’s basically going to be like deja have you from last year where we have to start trying to petition independent Senators again to stop stop the Bill having the numbers. But let’s see what happens.

 

I kind of excited but kind of let down as well by the fact that we’ve got to choose between a shit leader in Dutton that basically backed all of these Uni-party policies and created a lot of the infrastructure for you know, the what’s it called the Esafety Commission is a big one that we debated and spoke about a lot over the last couple of years. Them taking down our accounts. They took down a lot of your accounts. They took down a lot of my accounts during Covid. But let’s see what happens.

 

Hopefully One Nation wins and then hopefully we can clean up One Nation a bit to make sure that they’re a bit more responsive to what what we want. Because at the moment I feel like they’re serving the Liberal Party and they’re the Pauline Hanson leadership is a bit too stuck and stuck in their own old ways. I don’t think that the they really.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, the thing with One Nation is that Pauline Hanson is written into their constitution. Their members don’t have the ability to vote her out and vote other leadership in.

 

Host: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: And the members have basically no rights at all! There’s no branches in the One Nation Party. I’ve had friends try to sign up to One Nation to help them campaign this election, and they don’t even get them called back, you know, around the country. And I’ve heard this before, the Queensland election, the same thing. They’re like professional losers. They can be good people that can be put up as candidates. Like, they can somehow get the endorsement in these parties.

 

And so I’m not saying put One Nation last or anything. It’s still good for them to do well, even if I don’t like the party because it shows that the electorate is moving rightward and it’s stretching out the conversation. Yeah. They’re still better than. Obviously, they’re actually worth putting in over, like someone from one of the major parties. Like, they are going to vote better.

 

But in situations like in Queensland, where you can choose between Rennick or Malcolm Roberts, Rennick deserves your vote over Roberts. Roberts hasn’t earned it. Rennick has. And like in New South Wales, Craig Kelly deserves your vote over One Nation. Like, Craig Kelly tried to join One Nation tried to literally, like a year and a bit ago, he tried to push a strong campaign against immigration and then got frozen out of the party and frustrated and left because they’re professional losers that don’t actually want to take on the government. So then he went to the Libertarians, and now the New South Wales Libertarians are pretty good. They put him in. And I don’t like the Victorian Libertarians, but the New South Wales wing of the Libertarians are pretty decent. And so good luck to him! I think he has a good chance of winning. He has brand recognition. He almost won. He almost got in last time. He missed out by not much when he was running for the UAP at the last election. I would like to take Craig Kelly in the Senate. He’s obviously better.

 

And like you said, Kelly and Rennick, they’ll actually respond on Twitter. And they’re responsive to people like us, and they’re responsive to voters and they seem sincere, even if they’re kind of like Boomerish and they’re a little bit behind the times or behind where the Right-wing is going to go in the coming decades. They’re still well intentioned in my opinion.

 

So yeah, I definitely endorse them too. I don’t really know enough about the candidates in some of like South Australia, West Australia, to be honest. But I would just say like just put all the Right-wing minor parties near the top. That’s all that matters. And I would say again, put Liberal Party last. They need to be punished, even if it’s short term. Maybe they might do one or two things better than labour, but it’s not worth it. Like punishing them and destroying them and making space for a real Right-wing to emerge in the coming years and teaching your friends to hate Liberal Party, teaching your family, explaining to your dad who watches Sky News or whatever, fuck the Liberal Party, like that’s what we need to do as like the kind of Spearhead of the Right-wing.

 

We need to disabuse people of the Liberal Party and we need to punish them and destroy them so that they can never occupy. We need to destroy the dichotomy, the red team, Blue team, Uni-party dichotomy. You need to completely undermine them structurally so that we can create space on the Right-wing for a real actual functional Right-wing.

 

And that might mean one election cycle of pain, but that’s already where the mood of the people is. They’re going to lose the election precisely because of this. They’re going to lose votes to the Right, like I said, and they’re going to continue losing votes to the Right. And our job the memes and ideas that are kind of prominent on Right-wing Twitter now are going to bleed down into the general voter base over the next few years.

 

[1:07:57]

 

So if we all push hard on the kind of fuck the Liberals position over the next few years, it will bleed down. And by the time we get to 2028, the Right-wing minor party vote could be 25%, could be 30%. And a lot of these people could be elected maybe even in the lower house and we could have way more Senators. We could really start to have a kind of dynamic, you know, shift in Australian politics.

 

Look in European countries where the Reform Party is now polling above the conservative Party in Britain. And the Reform Party have their issues, but they’re clearly to the right of the conservatives on a lot of issues. And look at like places like Germany. The Alternative for Deutschland is like number one party in Germany now. They have re-migration in their party platform. They’ve got the Freedom Party in Austria polling, they’re the most popular party in Austria. They’re borderline ethno-nationalists, ultra conservative. You’ve got rise in Right-wing minor parties all across the European political system, in France and in Sweden, many countries.

 

So we should seek to emulate that and destroy the conservatives because the kind of the centre Right conservative Party, they kind of hold the stability in a status quo. They, the Liberals kind of ensure that this kind of basically there’s no real opposition to the agenda. So whenever the Left push on a new issue, the conservatives, Liberals, they always basically, they provide a very weak resistance and capitulate on the core message or the core points. And we’ve seen that time and time again. We can’t allow that to just kind of perpetuate itself in our political system. We have to actually demand a contest where it’s like a full on Right-wing versus Left-wing, like serious policy differences. Not like oh we want to cut this tax instead of that tax or this excise instead of this kind of tax cut and all this kind of shit that they debate about. That’s fucked! Like if that’s what our political debate is, you might as well not even care. Like the whole thing is we don’t really have a real say, or a real direction.

 

Host: I saw an interesting piece of commentary the other day and we’ll end it shortly.

 

The fact that Peter Dutton has kept on calling on John Howard either in commentary or literally physically dragging his carcass out to try to galvanise support. Like he doesn’t realise that people, one, there’s a majority younger voters than non-younger voters that he needs to win over. And two, the younger voters, like even myself I was a bloody probably like what, maybe 4, 5, 6 years old when he was prime minister. Not even like maybe, yeah, three, four years old, something like that. I was born in 92.

 

But what I’m, what I want to get at is that we just don’t care about these old dragged out, you know, politicians that they think that are gonna, we’re gonna say oh yeah, because John Howard supports you and because you bring it up and talking points all the time. Yep, you’ve got my vote. I mean I feel like they really need to adapt or perish. And right now they’re gonna perish.

 

But yeah, it’s a shame that it’s gone this way. But I agree on that. If anything, I agree that it’s time for them to perish. It’s time for them to be punished for all of their sins and it’s time to galvanise and bring up a new strong Right-wing that is responsive to our grievances, that are actually, that actually resonate with the younger demographic and that aren’t going to be scared to give in to the bullshit, that I just pulled up before from Albo saying because you’ve got an opinion on having women in the army or because you think that the Illuminati might be responsible for certain things in history that you can’t have an opinion and you should be punished for it and kicked out from candidacy opportunities. I think that those days are all over now. I think that we need to punish them.

 

And I think it’s adapt or perish and I think it’s time for them to perish. And we are the Spearheads of that. Everyone that follows myself, everyone that follows you guys and the wider community, I think it’s a matter of time. It’s not a matter of if or when. It’s a matter of when, not if. For this to come to a head.

 

But what I want to end on is we’ve got what, a few days before the election. Is there anything that you want to plug to let everyone know where you guys are because you guys got kicked off X? I know you guys trying to appeal that, but where can everyone find you for at least the time being?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, I don’t think we’re getting back on X anytime soon because there was clearly some high level government order to ban all of us at once from I don’t even know who, what department. Our Freedom of Information requests. It wasn’t Esafety. I got my Freedom of Information request back from them. They have no records pertaining to my banning. They had records pertaining to taking other tweets down and stuff, but not actually the banning. So it’s higher than them. Could be Department of Home affairs, could be the Prime Minister himself. Could be ASIO, could be them asking their friends in the CIA or the Mossad to get rid of us. Who knows?

 

But the point is we’re not going to be back anytime soon. But yeah.

 

So you can find me on Telegram. The handle is JoelDavistion X on Telegram. And you can watch the show that I do with Blair every usually Thursday night, sometimes Friday nights on Rumble. Rumble.com slash Joel Davis. I’m also on Odysee. Odysee.com Joel Davis. You can find me on Odysee. But Rumble is probably better. So follow me on Rumble, follow me on Telegram. Keep up to date with what we’re doing. Even if you think maybe I’m a little bit too extreme, it’s still interesting. I think the stuff that I put out is still interesting. You should still take it into consideration. It seems like a lot of the ideas that I put out lately have been taken into consideration by more moderate figures.

 

Actually, I’ve seen the influence bleed down like Trumpeter Patriots seem to have stolen a few of my talking points, which I am happy to see. You know, I wish Clive could have reached out at the beginning and maybe like swung me some of those sweet Clive bucks. I could have helped advise them get more votes than what they’re probably going to get.

 

[1:14:22]

 

Host: But you said something along the lines of instead of spending like 70 million or whatever the number was, just give me one of those and I could have done the whole campaign for you.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And they probably got like three times as many votes, but you know, 70 million. I saw John McGowan talking about this on a podcast. He said let one of his buddies crunch the numbers and you could buy a controlling stake in Channel 7 for about 70 to 100 million. Which is about what Clive has spent on just this election cycle and all these advertisements he’s taken out everywhere. Clive, just buy Channel 7! And turn Channel 7 into a Right-wing network! Put like replace Kochi with Ralph Babet or something. Give me a show on there and that’s the next election. We will absolutely destroy! Like Trumpeter Patriots or United Australia Party, whatever it is you guys will slap and you can put as many ads on as you want for free because you’ll own the Network. Buy Channel 7 or buy Channel 9 or buy One of these big channels. Clive, stop wasting all this money!

 

Yeah, let’s have some actual Right-wing media. Sky jews is not real Right-wing media. It’s a joke! So I’m poor Clive, like you know, invest that money more wisely, dude. Like you could get way further if you played it a bit more intelligently.

 

But yeah, reach out if you want. Clive, if you’re watching I can give you some ideas.

 

But yeah, yeah, follow me on Telegram, follow me on Rumble. And yeah, put the Liberals last. You can read if you go on The Noticer. Noticer dot News, best news site in Australia by far. They’ve been attacking it lately. But it’s only emboldened the support the readership is flying for The Noticer. Best news journalism. That’s another thing by the way, Clive, you could swing them some cash, they could take you pretty far.

 

But yeah, I put, I published it or the notice. I published an opinion piece of mine called “put liberals last this election” a couple weeks ago. It caused some controversy. Some people said:

 

“Oh, what, so you’re going to tell me to vote Greens above Liberals? Are you going to try and get labour re-elected?”

 

They accused me of being a Labor Party shill. I was accused of being a Liberal Party shill a few weeks ago. Now apparently I’m a Labor Party shill. I’m not a shill for either of these groups. I hate both of these parties.

 

What I’m saying is I make the case in that article. You can find it put the Liberals last this election. Here it is. Go find that article, give it a read.

 

And I think I lay out a pretty compelling case that like in a preferential voting system, it’s not just about who you put first, it’s also about who you put last, because your votes gets recycled and assigned to other parties until you run out of preferences. So yeah, deprive these traitors of your support.

 

And yeah, we need to polarise this system. Liberals are the party of Boomers. Young people aren’t voting Liberal. Immigrants vote Labor. So Labor is the party of immigrants. Young Whites in the inner cities, young Lefties, they’re all voting Greens now. Young Whites who are not Lefties need to start voting for the Right-wing minor parties and punishing the Liberals and let them die with the Boomers.

 

And then we can have a real political system where it’s like the actual Left versus the actual Right and get rid of, just empty the centre. That’s the direction we got to go in if we want real political change.

 

So yeah, check that out. Follow noticer.news if you’re not already. It’s not my site. I’m not involved with it. They publish my opinion pieces sometimes but I’ve supported it, because they do great work! But they’re fully independent. There’s like some fake news going around that they’re like a front of the NSN. It’s not true. They are fully independent.

 

Host: I saw an ABC report on it. That was kind of funny.

 

Joel Davis: But what they said in the news was such bullshit! The WhiteAustralia.org is our new website where you can sign up to be a supporter, or a member. And they said:

 

“Oh, they’re using the same hosting service on WhiteAustralia.org as they’re using on Noticer News.”

 

But it’s like literally one of the three top Internet hosting providers that millions of websites use. So what does that prove? It’s like, oh what, we both used Amazon hosting, therefore we’re the same people. Like it’s ridiculous!

 

[1:18:37]

 

Host: Yeah, this is the article here. This was from a couple weeks ago. And you know, as much as people say that they hate what you guys stand for you guys at the forefront of so many of these talking points and you guys have been have become the test case for all these laws and I think it’s more interesting to me that you guys are the test case for all these things that we are concerned about. And you know, it is what it is if it was anybody else I’d speak to them as well.

 

But it’s you guys. So it lands on. It lands where the National Socialist Network sits. But good chat man. I think this was thoroughly entertaining for everyone that joined us. Thank you to everyone that joined us. We had probably about a thousand people that’s watched us, a couple hundred on Rumble as well. Just want to say thank you to self sufficient Scotsman for the 10 Superchat and yeah, hopefully we get a good result at the election. I guess we’ll all have to wait and see on Saturday. Thanks for the chat Joel. Appreciate your time.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, thanks for having me on and, …

 

Host: Thank you to everyone that’s watching as well. Please make sure to share the stream out so everyone can watch it a bit later as well and give us a subscribe on Rumble and follow us on X as well as well because putting out a lot of clips over the next four or five days from the election. I’m sure there’s going to be some more dumb that Albo and Dutton says. So I’ll be at the forefront of keeping you guys updated on that stuff. Take care everybody.

 

[1:20:06]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 4/29/2025 = 3)

Plaiedian
9 hours ago
Don’t forget people are confronting albo about his 200,000 sustainable immigration policy.
0 likes
Report

fdgrdfg
5 hours ago
Awesome. Would be awesome to invite Handsome Truth from USA also
0 likes
Report

OopsGotcha
5 hours ago
Jews are the problem.
0 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: Welcome to the show tonight. [14th of November, 2024] Neither Tom nor Blair are here yet. Blair said he was going to be late. I don’t know exactly what’s happening with Tom. I think he’ll be on in a second.

 

But as you can see here I’ve got the “Your Body My Choice” T-shirt on in solidarity with Nick Fuentes’s total beatdown of the BPD jewish feminist that came to his house. Apparently the pepper spray that he sprayed in this crazy bitch’s face was kind of weak.

 

So, that’s what she said. So maybe he needs to get a better brand of pepper spray. Maybe he could ask Victoria Police for some advice?

 

But, you know, nevertheless, it was pretty funny. So anyway, I thought I’d wear the gimmick shirt. But hey, anyway, how you guys going this evening? Welcome to the show. Like I said the boys will be on shortly. I think Tom will be on any second now, and then Blair will be on a bit later. And there’s a few things I wanted to get into, probably when at least have one of them to join me.

 

So let me see, someone said here in the chat, by the way:

 

“Why do Nazis need to necessarily control women?”

 

It’s about abortion.

 

I mean, thing about the abortion thing is, abortion’s disgusting, but at the same time, I don’t think it should be the priority like in our politics, like in particular in America. I mean, quite frankly, you know, abortion is disproportionately performed by blacks, and it kind of culls the black population in a certain way.

 

Now, it’s pretty distasteful in a purely White, ethno-state, virtuous society, I don’t think we should really be having abortion. But is it really the priority? Like, should we be going after abortion first before we fix immigration, before we re-establish White rule? I don’t think so. I think it’s a very low priority.

 

But it’s funny! It was funny in the aftermath of the American election to see all these fat communist women, libtard women, proclaiming that they were not going to have sex with any man for the entirety of the Trump administration. Like as if the dudes were just lining up to slam these land whales! I found it quite humorous. It’s just a bit of a joke.

 

Anyway, it’s a bit of fun.

 

So here’s a story that I want to talk about actually, because it’s actually got an interesting context. I spoke to the editor over at The Noticer about this. So this is a story that was published today:

 

“Students punished for calling ‘trans’ teacher ‘sir’ at a high school taken over by radical gender ideology.”

 

Now this is from Richmond High School in, it’s in Greater Sydney. If you know Sydney, you know Richmond. It’s not the Richmond in Melbourne, it’s the Richmond in Sydney. But apparently one of the teachers there has turned out, has become a so-called “transformer”, if you will, is wearing a, … It’s a dude in a dress, right? It’s a dude in a dress. Some freak in a dress.

 

Anyway, so he’s obviously been demanding that the students all refer to him by the correct pronouns. And you know, as you can imagine there’s a lot of young boys there that aren’t going to vibe with that. So they’re refusing to go along with that. And they’re getting pulled before the principal’s office and so on and threatened with expulsion from this high school just because they won’t call the teacher Ms instead of Mrs. Sorry, Ms instead of Mr or Sir. I’ll read some of the article here, actually:

 

“Photos provided to Noticer News by students at Richmond High School northwest of Sydney show far-Left transgender propaganda posters produced by LGBT Youth advocacy group Minus 18 placed around the school. The teenagers said that pins promoting so-called transgenderism have also been handed out to teachers to wear and they’ve been threatened with suspension for complaining about the posters despite 80% of the student body being opposed to pro-LGBT material being put on display at their school. One of the large posters says: ‘All genders, identities, expressions, pronouns welcome here’ while another titled ‘Your identity is awesome’ provides unscientific radical Leftist definitions of so-called ‘LGBTQIAs identities.’”

 

You know, as you can see here in this image. A quote from one of the students.

 

“It seems as if the entire school has changed within the last year and the community is very unhappy about this,’ a student told Noticer News, adding that many of his peers and teachers were upset about having ‘views forced on [them] that they don’t agree with’.”

 

So apparently, by the way, according to the editor at Noticer News, the students at the school were advised by one of their teachers, I guess, who they trust, to reach out to Noticer News and provide these quotes. So obviously we’ve got some White nationalists, perhaps of some description that are embedded within the school there. So that’s pretty cool! A bit of a culture war brewing:

 

“The student says that changes began when a male teacher quote came out as trans and administrators began to threaten students for using the wrong pronouns. And now it felt like the whole school had been quote, ‘taken over’. To quote the student in September, ‘I greeted the teacher who I knew before he started to claim to be a woman with ‘Good day, sir’, which seems like a normal thing to say straight after, you know, he gets pulled out of class and reprimanded, etc.”

 

But threatened, not just with threatened to be expelled from the entire high school because he won’t go along with his nonsense! And yeah, just as you can see, predictable shit like the school just trying to force this nonsense down their throat.

 

Anyway, this is a Noticer News exclusive, so I thought bring attention to it. It is quite interesting, like a little bit of culture war playing out at an Australian high school.

 

[07:50]

 

Also a couple hours ago I replied to Senator Malcolm Roberts on Twitter. You know, I do make a habit of kind of trying to be part of the conversation with a lot of these politicians, particularly the ones that are the so-called, you know, Right-wing, our guys. Not really, but you know, the so-called our guys.

 

And anyway, I just left some, … Let me read out my response actually, because it is kind of interesting because he reacted to me and agreed with what I said. So people say:

 

“Ah this vote harder ism is the problem, you know, National Socialism or nothing!”

 

And obviously I agree with that principle. Obviously I agree with that principle.

 

But when it comes to injecting ourselves into the political conversation, sometimes you have to engage with it with a certain amount of good faith. And so we don’t have anyone running in the next election. As I’ve said we would. Our ambition is to have people running the election after the federal, not the next federal election, which will be, I think they’re saying, between March and May next year, the Australian election. It’s too soon for us to do it properly. We could do it, but we wouldn’t be able to do it properly.

 

Whereas if we wait till the next cycle, I think we can do it properly. But until we have our guys running in the election, well, what are we supposed to do? Just sit it out or try and engage with it in some way? Try and move the origin window, try and have an impact.

 

And so the two kind of parties that are to the right of the Liberal Party, which obviously I think are going to win the election, but obviously we’re not satisfied with. We’re not satisfied with the Liberal Party that are cuckservatives in every way shape and form, barely indistinguishable from the Left, frankly. But the two options therefore really at the national level is One Nation and the Libertarians. And they’ve both got problems, the Libertarians, well, their problem is that they’re libertarians so they’re not nationalists. They do have a lot of good policies on many issues though. They’re pretty solid on free speech and gun rights and so on. But to be fair, so are One Nation. They don’t seem to do the Zionist thing. I haven’t really heard the Libertarian Party say much about that either way. They just seem to avoid the subject.

 

I saw John Ruddick, the elected representative in New South Wales, get interviewed by a nationalist, which I mentioned on the show a couple weeks ago, I think, and he basically stated that he supports in Australia First, you know, foreign policy where we don’t meddle in the affairs of faraway countries. Explicitly called out, I think the Iraq war as something that he was opposed to. So that was a pretty good sign.

 

However, when it came, when it comes to One Nation we see Pauline Hanson, you know, bending over backwards to prostrate herself before the Zionist lobby and prove how pro-Israel she is. And, it’s pretty disgusting! But we’re not America. So it’s a bit less of an issue here than in America, where America, it’s very decisive because ultimately that’s where the decisions get made around that kind of thing and we just kind of get dragged along with the Americans.

 

So that’s a win for the Libertarian Party.

 

But then on immigration, traditionally you would think One Nation would have a better immigration policy and that’s the most important policy. So you would think you would lean more towards one nation. But John Ruddick said in that interview also that the Libertarians would support a five year immigration moratorium, meaning five years, complete shut borders, no one coming in for five years. I’m sure there might be some exceptions to that I don’t know, marriage visas or something like that, but basically shut the borders. And that’s more radical than the One Nation proposal, which is Net Zero, meaning we only let in the amount of people that we let out, which is about. Or that leave. It’s not about let out. Obviously you’re free to leave. So it’s about 70,000, I think, a year leave Australia and move to another country.

 

And so that way, like there would be basically one in, one out policy, which obviously is a lot better than the one that we currently have, but it’s still not exactly good enough because some of those ones out are going to be White and some of those ones in are going to be brown. So that’s not ideal. Right. If it was one in, one out, but they had to be White, then that’s a great policy. But they didn’t have any stipulations like they have to come from a Western country or anything like that.

 

So if they change the policy to something like that, obviously I’d be more supportive.

 

[12:44]

 

But, you know, neither of them are talking about sending the people back that are already here. You know, you’ve got, I think, 2.4 million people living in Australia on temporary visas, meaning they aren’t permanent residents, they aren’t citizens, they’re on some kind of classification of temporary visa. And a massive portion of that, I think about a million almost, are on student visas, which is just ridiculous! Particularly considering that we’re in a housing crisis. The university system is basically a giant rort.

 

Like a lot of these international students, they aren’t really students, they just sign up to some educational institution in order to get the visa, then don’t really study and they’re just like some Indian that comes in and then goes and starts driving Uber, eats and then tries to use that as a way to stay in the country.

 

Also, there’s hundreds of thousands of people in Australia estimated to be overstaying their visa, so they’re technically illegal immigrants. So they all need to be round up and deported.

 

Then you’ve got a million people here on student visas. Frankly, they should all just be cancelled and all sent back and not renewed and they shouldn’t be extended to anyone else. If you did that immediately, you’re sending, you know, one point something million, mostly brown people back out of Australia. The housing crisis would reset, wages would start growing, rents would start coming down. It would be a massive relief economically to the average Australian’s quality of life. But also the demographics of the country would improve. A lot of brown faces would be saying:

 

“See you later.”

 

So that’s something that I would support, but no one’s talking about it.

 

Obviously the Liberal Party must be getting funded in some way by lobby groups. We know for a fact that they’re getting funded by the property lobby that benefits from this policy. We know that they’re getting funded by the financial lobby which benefits from basically increasing property prices because everyone has to go and get a mortgage that’s even bigger to be able to buy a house. So that benefits the financial services industry. And then also big business corporate lobbyists also like immigration because it drives down the cost of wages.

 

So they’re all funding the Liberal Party campaign which is why they’ll try and act like they’re strong on immigration. But if you look at what they’ve actually concretely promised, I think it’s something like a 25% reduction on the already ridiculous record breaking immigration levels under Labor, which are more than double what they were under the previous Liberal government.

 

So what the Liberals are basically promising is not even to go back to the immigration levels under them before Covid when the last Liberal government was in charge and we had like a normal, like the pre-Covid because obviously during Covid the borders were shut and so that did reduce immigration.

 

But it wasn’t because, immigration wasn’t reduced because of as a policy, it was just a temporary thing because of Covid.

 

So they’re not even promising to go back to that. They’re saying we’ll go down 25% so they’re still going to be way above where they were before, and that’s what they’re promising. Will they actually deliver that? I don’t actually have faith in the Liberal Party to deliver that. Like the Labor government promised to reduce it even more than that and did the opposite.

 

So how can you trust either of these scumbags? You know, you just can’t!

 

So the Liberals basically are going to do nothing about immigration, more or less. We might as well just write it off entirely. They need to be pressured from the Right and obviously their policies are better. These are the kind of smaller Right-wing parties which between them will get if they campaign well, 15% of the vote between them I would predict if they campaign well.

 

So it’s a serious amount and the Liberals are probably going to win the election and there’s going to be a balance of power in the Senate that these smaller Right-wing parties might control. Very likely they could control.

 

So if they control that balance of power in the Senate then they’re going to have some leverage. So it is kind of relevant and important, like what their policies are, not just for, like the metapolitics of how they pressure the system, but also they have some leverage potentially and over the next government that they could exercise. Like the Greens exercise their leverage over the Labor government in a similar way to get a few concessions.

 

So, yeah, that means that if they want my endorsement and my endorsement obviously counts for something, then they’re going to have to try and win my endorsement. There’s a competition. And that’s how everyone needs to kind of play it. Like, in my opinion, as a movement, we say:

 

“Look, win us over. What we care about is immigration. Whoever’s going to go out there and fight hardest on immigration, you know, you’ll get our votes. And if no one fights on immigration, we’ll just sit out the election entirely. And if you both fight, we’ll try and pick the one that fights harder and gives us more.”

 

That’s a smart, transactional way of approaching this kind of thing. So that’s my approach.

 

I don’t actually anticipate that they’re going to give us very much at all! So I’m probably going to sit out the election entirely. But there’s a, you know, I’ll flirt with it, I’ll flirt with it. I’ll dance with the, with the, these politicians and we’ll see what they give us. If they just give us crumbs, they can go fuck themselves, if they want to give us something concrete, …

 

[18:12]

 

But anyway. So I responded to Malcolm Roberts and let me just pull it up so I can get up exactly what the conversation was. So he made a tweet which was:

 

“Albanese has let 393, 874 migrants arrive in Australia to September this year. This is the largest amount of arrivals for the first nine months of a year ever! This is why you can’t afford a house or find a rental!”

 

I mean, yeah, that’s true. I responded saying:

 

“You’re right to attack the government, but you should also be attacking the Liberals harder. They aren’t proposing anything close to the scale of immigration cuts necessary and they aren’t proposing the temporary Visa cancellations and deportations we badly need. Push harder, Malcolm!”

 

I really detest Pauline Hanson. Roberts does seem a bit better than her. I’m not saying I’m a Malcolm Roberts fan. You know, I’m not voting for it. I can’t vote for him anyway, I’m not from Queensland. But he does seem to be better, the better one in the party. Anyway, he responded saying:

 

“Agreed, Dutton has proposed a minor change to permanent visas per year. He has said nothing about temporary NOM which is adding to the 2.5 million TPV already in the country every year.”

 

TPV obviously is Temporary Visa holders. No, I’m obviously, I don’t know what that acronym means, but obviously has something to do with ones that are being proposed to issue in the future.

 

Anyway, it was a good response. So I said:

 

“Anti-immigration sentiment is the main reason why Aussies vote one nation. That’s just true. And you should be taking more votes of the Liberals than you currently are.”

 

Also true. I criticise them. You know, in the Queensland election they barely attacked the Liberals, they are attacking Labor and I understand that Labor is in government but frankly One Nation is competing with the Liberals for the Right-wing vote. They might get some votes off the Labor Party but they’re generally competing with the Liberals for voters.

 

So yeah, fine, attack Labor but you need to attack the Liberals just as hard, if not harder. And the fact that they don’t, it’s fundamentally suspect.

 

Which is why I speculated like are they a Liberal Party op? Do they exist as just like an extra wing of the Liberal Party to feed preferences into the Liberal Party? It’s entirely possible. Because obviously the way that preferential voting works in this country is that if you, because we have the temporary runoff system.

 

So if you have an electorate and say you’ve got like five candidates, well, the candidates that come first and second, if neither of them get 50% then the preferences from the candidates that get less votes filter into one or the other of the candidates depending on which one is preferenced higher or lower and then that ultimately produces the result. So One Nation feeds a lot of preferences into the Liberal Party, frankly.

 

And so they basically help the Liberals get elected. And Pauline Hanson came out and celebrated Liberals getting elected more or less, like in an indirect way immediately after the election.

 

But anyway, as I said here:

 

“And if you would make attacking their piss-weak policies on immigration and the student and family visa rorts your campaign focus, you would be taking more votes.”

 

So that’s just true.

 

So let’s see if he takes it to heart if they start going hard or if he starts going hard on student visas. And the family visa rort thing is also a thing like one jeet will get a visa whether they be a Refugee or some kind of working visa or whatever. And then they’ll drag in their parents not just the wife and kids, but their parents, their et cetera. And then all of a sudden, brothers, sisters, whatever. And all of a sudden we have this giant like family of jeets for like one guy. They say:

 

“Oh, we need to get more engineers into the country. Here’s one jeet that got a bullshit engineering degree from some bullshit like Indian university that probably can’t even do his job properly. This is going to help the economy so much and the country so much. We’ve got to get him in. So let’s get it. Bring him in!”

 

And then he brings his like retired Boomer Indian parents over who then just sit on Centrelink and collect benefits and collect Medicare and so on. And then brings in all these children who need to then go through our school system and so on. So then taxpayers just have to like dump hundreds of thousands of dollars a year onto this family of like parasites, which is probably more than the guy is even earning as a wage. And this is benefiting us how? This is contributing to our economy, how?

 

The whole thing is fucking ridiculous!

 

But yeah, so anyway, it was nice that he responded. I mean, Craig Kelly has responded to me before, but it was like an argument about race realism. But it’s good when the politicians respond. I do appreciate it. Even if they want to argue, at least have a conversation because yeah, frankly, a lot of the political, …

 

Like this week, two different journalists, one from Channel 7 and one from the ABC, contacted me to interview me and then pulled out when I agreed to it. And this has happened with many other journalists from others, whether it be newspapers or television channels or whatever, some even from overseas. So many times. I don’t think it’s the journalists themselves. I think what happens is that like maybe a journalist that’s like a low Ranking journalist goes:

 

“Well this is interesting look at what all these Nazis are doing.”

 

Then obviously not supportive. Like usually the journalists that contact me aren’t even White. They’ll go:

 

“Oh, this is interesting, an interesting story.”

 

And they probably want to write a hit piece like attacking me in some way. But I’ll agree to it, you know, I’ll give comment, why not? Let’s get some exposure.

 

[24:22]

 

And then they obviously put it before the editors and is like:

 

“Oh, here’s my idea, I’m going to go and interview Joel Davis or whatever.”

 

And they’re like:

 

“No, fuck!”

 

Like, they just like pull the pin. So that’s the strategy and it’s the strategy of a lot of people in Australian politics is to run away from having a discussion, or a disagreement or an argument, or a debate with me. Many run, few will front up.

 

That’s one good thing about Drew Pavlou. At least Drew Pavlou will have a debate. Like Drew Pavlou, he has this kind of weird ego complex where he won’t block anyone on Twitter and he’ll show up and like debate on the Elijah Schaffer show and everything and get embarrassed in front of hundreds of thousands of people. Not many other people in Australian politics will do that. So I like that about Drew. Like he’s so narcissistic that he ends up being useful.

 

But yeah, I highly doubt many other figures in Australian politics have the minerals to front up and debate me for two hours. I really do, because I’d smoke them! And they’re obviously intimidated. And that’s obviously one of the reasons why the journalists suppress any kind of interviews of me or whatever as well. Because they don’t want to have competent, … They do it to the other guys in the organisation as well. They don’t want us to have competent reply. They always want to frame it as just like a hit piece, take our comments, you know, out of context.

 

There’s been times where my comments have made the media when I’ve been in public at some event and then the media has interviewed me and they’ve played it on television or they’ve put it in a news article. But generally speaking, like whenever it’s planned and they have time to think about it, they always just, … It gets kiboshed. You know, the, like ZOG [Zionist Occupied Government] comes in is like:

 

“No, you can’t publish those quotes!”

 

So anyway, my point is its nice to be in the conversation as much as possible because it adds legitimacy and fundamentally my views are very reasonable. My views are more reasonable than pretty much all of the mainstream politicians. They just never get subjected to the right kinds of critical scrutiny.

 

Another issue in Australian politics that has been interesting. I’ll cycle through this as well before Tom gets here because he’ll be here soon.

 

Another issue in Australian politics recently which has been a positive development is, and we talked about this on the show last year a lot. There’s been a lot of discussion about it online recently because it’s been going through the Parliament. It’s the so-called Misinformation and Disinformation Bill, also known as the MAD Bill, which is a good name. And the bill, if you don’t know about it, basically what the Bill is, it enables a department within the Australian government called ACMA*, which is like the Department of Communications, basically to have authority over the regulatory practises of social media companies to basically impose their regulatory standards. So to be able to go to Twitter and Facebook and Instagram and so on, and say “this kind of discussion can’t be allowed on your platform”.

 

[* The Australian Communications and Media Authority is an Australian government statutory authority within the Communications portfolio. ACMA was formed on 1 July 2005 with the merger of the Australian Broadcasting Authority and the Australian Communications Authority. ACMA is responsible for collecting broadcasting, radiocommunication and telecommunication taxes, and regulating Australian media.]

 

And then if you look at the criteria for what constitutes so-called misinformation and disinformation, it’s ridiculous! Like, a lot of the stipulations in there basically enable them to shut down any kind of critical discussion of various government policies, like health policies, environmental policies, economic policies.

 

But in addition to that, they also say “harm”. But then if you look at the definition of harm within the legislation, harm is defined by a whole series of, … Actually, I’ll pull up the exact legislation here and I’ll read it out for you guys, because basically, more or less, it could ban basically everything that I say on the Internet because you could classify it according to how vague this is so, yeah:

 

“Misinformation and disinformation both have a provision in this Bill which is that it is reasonably likely to cause or contribute to serious harm. According to the definition of these terms. Harm means any of the following. (A) hatred against a group in Australian society on the basis of ethnicity, nationality, race, gender, sexual orientation, age, religion or physical or mental disability.”

 

How do you define that? That could basically mean advocating for White nationalism equals hatred. Therefore all of our shit needs to be banned!

 

There’s other stipulations here, like:

 

“Harm to the health of Australians, harm to the Australian environment.”

 

So doing harm to the health of Australians, like during Covid would that mean if you criticise the vaccine, they could say:

 

“Oh, that’s bad public health misinformation!”

 

And just like, ban it:

 

“Economic or financial harm to Australians.”

 

Like, so what does that mean? Like, if you go out and say:

 

“Hey, the economy is a Ponzi scheme, like, we’re in a per capita recession, the whole economy is propped up by mass immigration and financial usury and so on.”

 

What is that undermining public faith in the economy? Is all that discussion supposed to be banned?:

 

“Harm to the integrity of Australian democratic processes or of Commonwealth, state, territory or local government institutions.”

 

What does that mean? Like, just any criticism of the government itself, like, as a legitimate entity.

 

So this definition is so expansive, as I said, it could literally ban our entire political viewpoint. But not just our political viewpoint. Like almost any critical viewpoint from any position along the political spectrum could be just banned under the arbitrary whims of a bureaucracy.

 

So obviously that’s completely ridiculous and intolerable! How can that be?

 

[30:33]

 

 

Anyway, the good news is it did pass the House of Representatives, which is controlled by Labor, unfortunately. But Labor doesn’t control the Senate. There’s 76 Senators. I think Labor only has like 24. You need 39 to pass a bill. Now the Greens have like six and they’re tipped to support it. So that bumps their numbers up. And then there’s a maybe I’m getting the number slightly wrong here.

 

But basically on the No side, you have the Liberals who have come out against it. One Nation, Ralph Babet, who posted the N word on Twitter this week, which was kind of funny, speaking of Australian Senators and their Twitter antics. And a few of these of the other Independents. So according to everyone who has committed to voting against it, I think there’s 36 Senators that have committed to voting against it, and 36 Senators that have committed to voting for it. That is under the assumption that all the Green Senators and Labor Senators are going to vote for it. And there’s like four undecided Senators.

 

The undecided Senators are Jacqui Lambie. What’s that vile woman’s name, who used to be in the Greens, Lidia Thorpe. But she’s made some statements against it. She’s kind of like a loose cannon. She could go against it. That Muslim woman who left the Labor Party and is now independent. Payman, I believe her name is. She wears the hijab and she had that, like, cringe speech in the Senate where she tried to use all that Zoomer speak. That was probably the most cringe thing that’s ever happened in the history of Australian Parliament. And Senator [David] Van, who was in the Liberal Party, but then there was some kind of scandal where apparently he sexually assaulted some other member, like some staffer or something. Van has made statements that maybe he would support the bill, which is a shame.

 

But the other three have made statements that they’re critical. So if two out of those three or two out of those four go against the bill, the bill’s killed. And, yeah, so it’s looking like the Bill is going to suffer. They keep, like, avoiding the vote. I saw a lot of articles come out yesterday saying the Bill could be killed, basically. So I saw Australians versus the Agenda. They had like a list of all the Senators contact details that I just mentioned on their social media. So go check out their Telegram or their Twitter and you can like email the Senators and like tell them to vote against it or whatever if you want to do some, like, civic activism.

 

It seems like the pressure campaign against it is actually working because Pocock, who used to be a Wallaby rugby player who got elected, and some other Senator, I can’t remember her name, from Tasmania, they both came out against it on free speech grounds, said they’ll vote against it, and said that, well they’ve got a lot of public outcry against the bill.

 

Also, there was a poll that was done. And the poll, basically it had a lot of people that didn’t know whether they supported it or not, but 52% of people were against the Bill and only like 17 supported it and then the rest are undecided. So it’s clearly like really unpopular.

 

So hopefully that Bill gets killed because if that gets passed, it could pose a big problem. We might be kind of dependent upon the social media companies themselves telling the Australian government to get fucked or the American government, you know, imposing their regulations and kind of big dogging the Australian government. Otherwise, and I don’t really want to be dependent on the whims on either of those whimsical. That’s the situation.

 

But anyway. Blair, how you doing?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I made it! Sorry I was late tonight, guys. I just had a late client and things didn’t work out the way I planned. I intended to get home sooner. What does your T-shirt say, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: It says, “Your body, my choice”.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that in reference to the video I saw of Nick Fuentes?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s the story with that? You might have been through it already, but who was that woman who went to his house?

 

Joel Davis: Maybe I could play the video. There’s like a video of it that was filmed from her phone so we could play it.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know anything about the circumstances surrounding that incident. Did he know who she was? I don’t know.

 

Joel Davis: So basically what happened was on the night of the election, of the American election, Fuentes made a tweet when it was clear that Trump would win, saying, “Your body, my choice”. Because obviously, like the catchphrase of the pro-choice feminists around the abortion issue is, “My body, my choice”. So he was kind of, it’s like a play on words because obviously it has a kind of like rape implication, but it doesn’t mean that it’s kind of like, cheeky because it doesn’t actually mean that. It just basically means the democratic will of the people, the collective, like, morality of society is preventing you from killing your own child.

 

So you can look at it in different ways, but either way, it made the feminists freak out, which was funny. And the tweet went super viral. And Fuentes also had a rant on his show that became like, TikTok viral and got millions and millions of views and lots of responses and all these media articles got played.

 

[36:28]

 

And so the feminists, because there’s all these feminists in America that they’re like, fat, putrid, disgusting! That are coming out and saying:

 

“I’m not going to have sex with anyone for the entire Trump presidency because my rights have been taken off me and I’m punishing men!”

 

And then it’s just like:

 

“Yeah, like, no one wanted to fuck you anyway, bitch!”

 

[chuckling] Or like everyone’s, conservatives, and they’re like:

 

“Yeah, we don’t want you having casual sex with random dudes anyway. Like, why don’t you get married and have sex with your husband and actually be like an upstanding woman, rather than a whore!”

 

So, it’s kind of funny. It’s like the seed.

 

But anyway, he had a rant which was just kind of rubbing it into the feminists, going on about how like:

 

“A woman will never be president. You know, the glass ceiling is like paved over with bricks!”

 

Because obviously this is the second woman that Trump has [chuckling] now beaten in succession, I guess, like if you kind of skip over the Biden one. And so, yeah, anyway, so this, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Did he know this girl who’s coming to his door?

 

Joel Davis: The feminists got really upset at Fuentes and they doxed his home address and posted it all over Twitter. I saw his address all over Twitter. And they were like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But who is this woman who went to his house?

 

Joel Davis: This is just some random jewish woman who’s like, she looks, you look at her face. She looks like a BPD*. Like a post menopausal fat BPD [Borderline Personality Disorder] woman in her early 50s or something. And she’s jewish.

 

[* Borderline personality disorder is a personality disorder characterized by a pervasive, long-term pattern of significant interpersonal relationship instability, a distorted sense of self, and intense emotional responses. People diagnosed with BPD frequently exhibit self-harming behaviours and engage in risky activities, primarily due to challenges regulating emotional states to a healthy, stable baseline. Wikipedia]

 

Blair Cottrell: Is she a journalist? What was her intention going there?

 

Joel Davis: She’s just like some feminist that just saw his dox and just, she’s just crazy! Went to harass him.

 

Blair Cottrell: Wow! And well, let’s see what happens.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Woman: Hi. Oh my God! What are you doing?

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s he doing? Kicking her? What’s he doing? He took her phone. Okay.

 

Joel Davis: Basically he maced her in the face. I think he like kicked her and then grabbed her phone, told her to get the fuck out of his house and then like started like smashing the phone underneath his foot or something. [Blair barely able to control himself from bursting out laughing]

 

But then the police showed up and made him give the phone back.

 

Blair Cottrell: Has he been charged or interviewed in relation to it? Like, does that mean I don’t know what happens in America? Are you allowed to do that in America?

 

Joel Davis: I think. So I mean, I don’t know what the, … I guess we’ll see because she said she’s going to press charges, but she, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Did he pepper spray her at the start? Is that capsicum spray he used?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But she said that the pepper spray was kind of weak. So I said earlier in the show that he maybe get on the phone to Vic Pol and get a recommendation for some high quality shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, the stuff Victoria Police uses down here is definitely not weak. [chuckling] Yeah, yeah.

 

Joel Davis: But anyway. But thing is that she was apparently at the front of his house for ages, yelling, shit, being hysterical. So like, so he’s sitting in his house. His address has been posted all over social media and it’s America!

 

Blair Cottrell: So it’s like he wasn’t just sitting there with Mace waiting for someone to knock on his door. She’d already made herself known.

 

Joel Davis: His address has been posted all over the Internet and all these people are posting:

 

“I’m gonna go over to Nick Fuentes’s house and like fuck with him or whatever.”

 

So he’s probably already like on edge.

 

And then this is crazy, like fat jewish woman, like being hysterical in his front yard. And then she comes up to the house and starts like hitting the doorbell. So I guess, you know, mace out, like, move quickly.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I suppose he felt threatened. Right? This woman’s at the front of his house. He doesn’t know who she is. She’s probably screaming out his name and all sorts of harassment, you know, comments that could be construed as harassment. Then she actually comes to the door.

 

So I don’t know. I think he’s within his rights to capsicum spray her.

 

Joel Davis: That in my opinion, he’s within his rights to do it.

 

I mean, at the end of the day, she’s on his property. So like. And she’s there to harass him. Like she’s there to fuck with him in some ways. So he can do what he likes.

 

Blair Cottrell: He would definitely be charged in Australia. You couldn’t do something like that in Australia. But no, America has all these what is it, the First Amendment rights, you have the right to defend yourself and your property or something?

 

Joel Davis: The Second Amendment says is the right to defend, to bear arms. It’s not the right to self defence. Self defence is protected through legislation. I don’t know what the specific laws are in Illinois because Fuentes lives in Chicago. I don’t know what the Illinois specific laws are.

 

So I can’t really comment on whether there’s a legal case or not. You know, also the fact that he is a political dissident of prominence and Illinois is a Blue state that probably has very like Left-wing judges that he could get in trouble on the basis of that, like their bias against him. Right? But she said she’s going to press charges.

 

But also in my opinion, her statements show a clear intent to harass him. She’s been hysterically posting all this on social media and was posting before she even like I think rang the doorbell. So.

 

[41:41]

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

[1:55:50]

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 11/15/2024 = 364)

HyperChat min: 100
Thorne91
4 hours ago
Could a healthy, fascist Australia handle a Chinese invasion? How many malnourished chinks can a Joel, Tom or Blair take at one time is the question.

2
0
Hide replies
WhiteLightWhiteHeat
2 hours ago
Many

ChainReaction
8 hours ago
o/

2
0
C.A.S.S.
8 hours ago
More

1
0
Thorne91
4 hours ago
Regarding Nick and American law: some states are a “stand your ground” state. Texas, Florida, typically red states. In other states run by liberals, you have a “duty to retreat” before you engage a threat. This would apply to being mugged or beat up or any of that. Maybe it’s different since she’s at his house, but I’m pretty sure a judge in Illinois can fuck him up if they want. He needs to move to a deep red state. In Texas you could probably shoot a woman who refuses to leave your property. Especially if she’s hostile and you’ve given verbal warning. So…self defense is definitely state by state.

1
0

@Horatius
8 hours ago
thanks. always get great insight from these streams. top notch articulation

1
0
MagicManintheSky
8 hours ago
o/

1
0

@Horatius
8 hours ago
o/

1
0
C.A.S.S.
8 hours ago
Less

1
0

@Horatius
8 hours ago
everyone can contribute in some way. just going into libertarian and conservative online chats and trying to win them over to our side is something that can be done. I’ve had success and others have to. they have a hard time arguing against us nowadays

1
0

@NotBabyHitler88
8 hours ago
Trumps at war with the establishment…he loves jews

1
0
Thorne91
4 hours ago
Whites are israel, that’s why Jews want to destroy us all. And I can prove it here in comments. This non-white immigration has nothing to do with banks or economics or any of that shit, those are just excuses and methodologies.
In 745 BC Menasseh (a tribe of Israel, a WHITE ethnostate) was conquered by he Assyrians. YHWH punished them and kept Menasseh in bondage 7X for their sin (check Leviticus
26:18
)
The original punishment was 360 years. So multiply that by 7. You get 2520. So add 2520 years to 745 BC. You get – 1776. The tribe of Menasseh is the founding stock of America. Same thing with Britain. The tribe of Ephraim (another white ethnostate) was conquered by Assyrians in 721 BC. 7X 360, add to 721BC, you get 1801. This prophecy in Leviticus
26:18
accurately predicts he founding of America and Britain and ascribes these lands to the tribes of Menasseh and Ephraim. So basically…Jews are lying about being “chosen.” They are Edom. Genetic mutant baby-eating, blood-drinking, ritual-sacrificing monsters who completely take over everything any chance they get and they are LYING about who hey are. Edomites. And their #1 goal is to wipe out YHWH’s people who are European whites and our posterity. So…whether you believe in God, or the Bible, or not – Leviticus
26:18
should at least make you think twice about WHY it is so important to protect our people, who we really are, and who the Jews are.
I’ll continue below.
Less

0
3
Hide replies
Thorne91
4 hours ago
The OT is not Jewish, it’s white. Jesus was white. The Talmud is the true Jewish book and it’s the only one they care about. They just pretend to follow Torah but it’s a show. If Jews actually followed he Bible, they’d stop the usury and porn and all that disgusting degenerate shit. They dgaf about the Bible. They only follow Talmud.
So…hopefully these prophecies and this knowledge is helpful to someone. If you dig, all of the evidence points toward Israelites being white and Jews being Edom. And it only further solidifies the position of the national socialists. Christianity DOES have racial teeth, if you get past the Jewish schofield fake israel Zionist bullshit. And Leviticus
26:18
is just one of many points of evidence to back up what I’m saying here.

0
2
Thorne91
4 hours ago
o/

Thorne91
4 hours ago
*1775 my bad. I

Thorne91
3 hours ago
Wait no, it’s not 1775 it actually is 1776 because you count count the “zero” between BC and AD. It just goes directly from 1BC to 1AD. So yeah…Menasseh is accurately and specifically prophecies to come into their new land in exactly 1776. If this isn’t evidence Hebrews we’re white, idk what is. I loved this stream so much and I see so many NatSocs and Christians fighting…thank you Joel for not doing that. Neutered white Christians need to realize they’re Hebrews. That way, white Christians can maintain their faith in Christ, and ALSO have the exact same secular goals and beliefs as the national socialists. This knowledge gives teeth back to Christianity and then there’s no more reason for atheist NatSocs to reject believers in Christ. This is the answer. White Hebrews and proven in Leviticus
26:18
and all across the Bible.

Indo-European
1 hour ago
The age restriction legislation is a disaster. it will eventually mean the end of casual, anonymous browsing of all video and file servers. It would be better to ban children from using smart phones. As if they would ever do that

@BMC1488
1 hour ago
DONALD TRUMP WHITE POWER!

@BowHunter88
2 hours ago
You talk politics, yet you raise criminal act after criminal act this government commits on a daily basis. Organized lawfare to vompel governments to act lawful is a strategy it seems has never been attempted.

@Clyde
6 hours ago

tranny teacher in Canada

Dawn Browning
8 hours ago

@Horatius
Yup. They did a good job on Westernkind. Me included. Onwards…..

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
Less

Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
JoelBlairLove Love to all you Beautifuls MWAH

@Horatius
8 hours ago
they don’t even know they are a people, or don’t want to believe they are. they see others as groups but don’t see whites as one. I come across this constantly when interacting with average Whites. they were convinced by propaganda that they are just random individuals or scared of their white identity because Jews say that’s racist

@Bamzal
8 hours ago
o/

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
8 hours ago
two bloody wankers

DOLO
8 hours ago
o/

Archipelago Woes
8 hours ago
o\

DOLO
8 hours ago
Where is Margo?

@Horatius
8 hours ago
yup. spot on Blair

Hess’ Channel
8 hours ago
remade version of The Day of the Jackal with Nigs

@WeWuzKrangz
8 hours ago
based Blair

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
Your body, my choice is brilliant. Those who don’t think it through will jump to the conclusion that you are dictating what they can or cannot do reproductively, but in reality it is your choice as a man whether or not you would impregnate her in the first place.

@david_smith
8 hours ago
QLD LNP has a minister specifically excluding White Men, you should lobby/petition for a minister for White Men.

@Horatius
8 hours ago
if White men are United, there is nothing that cannot be accomplished. have to come together for our own interests and give up on individualism nonsense

DOLO
8 hours ago

@MagicManintheSky
You got another holocaust movie for me? Yes sir i do!

MagicManintheSky
8 hours ago

@DOLO
I hear you

DOLO
8 hours ago

@MagicManintheSky
I can’t wait to not watch another holocaust movie.

MagicManintheSky
8 hours ago
I see there’s a new Holohoax movie out to push the Israel wagon….

Matt Hammond
8 hours ago
That was whitepilling

Hess’ Channel
8 hours ago

@katana17
try this –
https://archive.org/details/history-of-the-white-australia-policy-to-1920

@david_smith
8 hours ago
Very much legally

@david_smith
8 hours ago
There are certainly things that can certainly be changed, with legal politics.

Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
JOEL! It’s bedtime

@Horatius
8 hours ago
but at the same time, the Jews and their lackeys sure seem to want to destroy the West and don’t care about the consequences. They want revenge at all costs it seems.

Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
We duck out, they gone. They have to be fully exposed & 111’d before we’re taken seriously.

@Horatius
8 hours ago
if not enough whites live in an area to prop it up, it will collapse into total shit. the government realized this years ago when it did happen, they had no white taxes to give to blacks and browns

@david_smith
8 hours ago
Orangutans

@david_smith
8 hours ago
Ok Joel is basically inline with my thoughts

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 hours ago
I hope Jews fumble live granades

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
*An

@david_smith
8 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
I think they fucked themselves

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
And alternative to the Sampson option

@david_smith

ChainReaction
8 hours ago
More

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago

@david_smith
I think the Jews will force WWIII once the antisemitism in the west is at a tipping point.

MagicManintheSky
8 hours ago
No more brothers wars for the Jew.

Dawn Browning
8 hours ago

@katana17
Are you still transcribing?

Hide replies

@katana17
1 second ago(edited)
Of course!
https://katana17.com/

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 hours ago
gud thing we’ll have plenty of kids with hundreds of hours of tower defence under their belts to help with the dark future

@david_smith
8 hours ago
I doubt it, Joel normally steals my takes that I never told anyone, but I don’t think Trump can mobilize WW3

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago

@david_smith
lol

ChainReaction
8 hours ago
“Conservatives risk nothing at all and gain everything.” ~ Raging Dissident

Hess’ Channel
8 hours ago
Trump will not stop Ukraine SMO

@Horatius
8 hours ago
republicans always talk a big game but when the moment of truth happens, they cuck and back down. we’ll see. I’ll believe them when I see it

Dawn Browning
8 hours ago

@katana17

@david_smith
8 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
My brown streamer is better than your brown streamer

Hess’ Channel
8 hours ago

@katana17
thats a Cebu upload – that’s China text scanning

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
Less

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
Less

@katana17
8 hours ago
https://archive.org/details/historyofwhiteau0000will/page/n5/mode/2up

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 hours ago
he literally one set above Voldemort

MagicManintheSky
8 hours ago
Jews own the Media. Jews control our minds.

The Crucible 01
8 hours ago

@david_smith
hasnt been decided yet, its either one of the mad max movies or trailer park boys.

@david_smith
8 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
Chopper?

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
come to

@JoeBorackOBiden
channel after joel is finished, we are watching a movie, (dw its chill there)

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@david_smith
Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. He’ll be right.

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
see subversive jew ^

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
when u decide who in power n u have blackmail on them, u effectively in power

DOLO
9 hours ago
If WN’s get control of just one country, it could have a domino effect throughout the world.

@Horatius
9 hours ago
I’ve heard people say that Jews don’t have true power, that they have heavy influence on those in power. there is a distinction. don’t know if true

MagicManintheSky
9 hours ago
Jews act like a hive mind

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
yes Joel Juice power is a certain extent an illusion

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
Some of us are up in 6 hours at 4am, you know.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
Yes, something forced can only last so long, everything returns to nature.

@david_smith
9 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
Poor guy tapped out to avoid being called racist for his honesty. Then got in shit anyway.

DOLO
9 hours ago
I think it’s the guy who threw the gangs in prison

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
It’ll return to the natural state…. eventually

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
tom got arrested again..(seriously hope not)

DOLO
9 hours ago
You could be right. One of the south american countries uses that leverage to still work with america, under threat of an alliance with russia/china

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@david_smith
I do miss Woodley

@Horatius
9 hours ago

@david
wow. did not know that or remember him saying that at the time.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago
The food problem is easily solved. Make it possible for a man to be a provider and a woman to be a homemaker again. Men want to be the provider and women want to be the homemaker, but they took that from us.

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
wanker ^

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
it’s the numbers, i suppose

@Horatius

DOLO
9 hours ago
If you built up the navy and allied with Russia/China, you’d probably be okay.

@david_smith
9 hours ago

@Horatius
He supported the mRNA injection, that is proof he is not an intelligent honest person who understands science.

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@Horatius
to a degree

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Indonesia

@Horatius
9 hours ago
wouldn’t Australia be easy to defend?

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
please be aware of ChainReaction he is a liar defending grifters.

MagicManintheSky
9 hours ago
Jewmurica

DOLO
9 hours ago
Probably Britain lol

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago

@MarkCollett
yes, it lends its elf to a Sharia mentality

@david_smith
9 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
I liked it when he had Woodley to control his nonsense.

ChainReaction
9 hours ago

@MarkCollett
<– THAT

@Horatius
9 hours ago

@david
why do you say that? just curious. doesn’t he just read studies that he trusts are real and true?

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
yes…ban heavy

@Sweet_Nerevar
9 hours ago
they’re conditioned to be soft now, but if U leave a little one with only transformers to watch he will be violent lol and U will have to roll play as Megatron at least once a week lol

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@david_smith

@Horatius
I like Ed.

Mark Collett
9 hours ago
The problem with the “Your body, my choice” slogan, is I am sure plenty of Muslims groomers had that attitude toward white girls.

@Horatius
9 hours ago
pure individuals would die if they were kicked out of the group centuries ago. the dna knows this it seems.

@david_smith
9 hours ago

@Horatius
He cannot understand how to do science.

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
ppl who work in Coles supermarkets

Mark Collett
9 hours ago
Most people are actually not leftists

@Horatius
9 hours ago
Dutton thinks leftists are spiteful mutants who wouldn’t exist if not for technology that saves them from dying in the womb or as children

Mark Collett
9 hours ago
Most people are conformists

@david_smith
9 hours ago

@JoeBorackOBiden
Y?

MagicManintheSky
9 hours ago
Segregate schools again.

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Blair must be hungry

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
Sex is further ingrained into DNA than anything else

@Sweet_Nerevar
9 hours ago
yeah thousands of yrs of successful hunts

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@MarkCollett
Ey up luv. Busy 24 hrs for you. Woodlander chat was Tip Top

@Horatius
9 hours ago
cool. Mark is one of the best out there. has been for years

@Sweet_Nerevar
9 hours ago
fat ho power grid

@Sweet_Nerevar
9 hours ago
hamster wheels…green energy,they’ll probably buy it

@david_smith
9 hours ago
That is IRL Mark, he watches the show

@Horatius
9 hours ago
Hey Mark o/ if that’s really you lol

@david_smith
9 hours ago
?

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Big brain strong, mild autist

DOLO
9 hours ago
jock

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
You can be scrawny & brawny

@david_smith
9 hours ago
That is like the black super hacker

@Horatius
9 hours ago
part of the obesity issue is caused by a high percentage of people quitting smoking. just started stuffing their face instead

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
participation prizes

DOLO
9 hours ago
Jamie Oliver had a tv show and he made healthy school lunches, and all the women were bringing in crisps and chocolate and passing it through the fence. They had to end it because the parents complained so much..

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@MarkCollett
top of the morning to ya

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Hey Mark

@david_smith
9 hours ago
The food is poison.

@Horatius
9 hours ago
50’s physical education in America was pretty based

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@JoeBorackOBiden
good, give those faggots no rest!

Mark Collett
9 hours ago
Hi guys!

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Obesity is almost entirely because of diet.

Homeschooledjedi
9 hours ago
0/chat

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
Nah he fucked off

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
activity at schools

@david_smith
9 hours ago
There was a teacher at highschool who did that with young teenagers…

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
he has prolly blocked you to

@JoeBorackOBiden
and is now talking crap about ya in his bed with the boys lmao

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Mandatory carnivore

@david_smith
9 hours ago
You have to reform who controls what the military is for.

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@JoeBorackOBiden
lmao nice

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
For

@ChainReaction
Less

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@joeldavis
sorry for shitting up the chat with this crap, but chain reaction needs to be called out and nnr, flood, logos, drilla etc need to be exposed for the pieces of shit that they are. they are lying grifters, doxing banning white natsocs to line their own pockets

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
Sorry to shit up your chat

@joeldavis

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
Less

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
weak

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
omg muting cass now.

scoobyburn
9 hours ago
this is an AU stream,,,,

MagicManintheSky
9 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
LOL

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
Couldn’t handle Crucible? had to mute him?

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Kaz Ross

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@MagicManintheSky
Burke models himself on Albo so much that I get them mixed up.

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
check the Minister who wrote it – Rowling

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Lobby Qld government to have a minister for White Men. It would easily get enough signatures to make them respond to it.

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
it could lead to political idea censorships.

MagicManintheSky
9 hours ago
Burke is a super Shabbos Goy in bed with Mark Dreyfuss.

@Ral9010NatSoc
9 hours ago
You toxic faggots are infecting every chat on Odysee. Get a fucking life you bitch niggers.

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
it gives ACMA take down notices which doc media must adhere to

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
MAD Bill will be selective

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@DOLO
now ask, has any of the faggots like Chain Reaction defending these scum provided any facts proving their innocence?

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@Hess
Cheers

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Also many in cities and suburbia

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
This

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
yes – Erikson’s YT chan

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Plenty of rural Aussies have missed all the anti-White shit

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@DOLO
flood doxing rango dingboth
Less

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@Hess
Is it still online?

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
Less

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@DOLO
drilla reporting the people calling his grift out h
Less

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@MagicManintheSky
yup

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Neil did a good interview with Roberts years ago

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
“loons with ill intentions” your projection is obvious

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
^

MagicManintheSky
9 hours ago
The Jews are anti-Nationalist in our countries but pro-Nationalist in Israel. Funny that.

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
piece of shit

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
Less

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@david_smith
not gossip, they are lying grifters and need to be called out

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Burke is juice heritage

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@DOLO
Graf, owner of poa.st who confirmed nnr would complain to him about other people, changed nnr’s handle because he was sick of the faggotry h
Less

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
Can’t handle criticism?

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Stop shitting up the chat with higschool girl gossip

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@david_smith
That was awesome, Dan vs Piers

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
ABC upset about SSM

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
yeah, just block disruptive loons with ill intentions

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
Less

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@DOLO
nnr publicly complaining to odysee on twitter h
Less

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
I’m muting those who are discussing that which is not relevant. Love Love

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Burke would n’t say that to Faruqi

DOLO
9 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
Write an article and prove all of your claims then. I’m not going to watch 3 hour streams to get an idea of what’s happening. If someone did that, i’d take a look.

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
he used to be the whip in Parliament

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Watch Dan Bilzarian Vs. Pierce Morgan. More so share it with people who are naive.

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@DOLO
nnr has doxed, banned complained to higher authorities etc and started the timeslot wars

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
you are right Blair…and social media, wiki and dumb internet sites caused that

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
CDC is all juice

DOLO
9 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
again, you can use the word grifter, but what do you even mean?

@Bamzal
9 hours ago
they’re poppin outta tunnels

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Absolutely genetic to a large degree, also the talmud.

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Blair – research the Talmud

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
lol

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
fucken dbots

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@DOLO
i dont give a fuck about tuber, im calling out the grifters and their defenders, do i need to share the screenshots again?

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
hahaha Dbots it is from now on

DOLO
9 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
You keeps using words like subversive, but do you really know what they mean? Why are you still defending someone that’s outed as brown?

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
Blair? BLAIR?????

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Karl Marx

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
lets call them Dbots

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Larry Fink

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
But it is the jews

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
yes, we have the proof including the word of social media owner poa.st, your a lying subversive faggot

scoobyburn
9 hours ago
biggest revenue from the web is porn & gambling

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
It’s so dumb. My lads hacked my passwords dozens of times. These u-16yos will be voting next

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
i keep hearing things like that

@Hess
but has it rly been confirmed?

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
lol

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
umm I.D that is digital duhh

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Tails was 0dayed years ago by Exodus

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
wont have it for long if your already there.

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
widely available porn is no good for kids

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
TAILS OS <– last place we’ll have, get it while u can

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
ACMA

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
You will use your MyGov

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
neither are you now fuck off jew!

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
nah, social media no good for kids n youths

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Dischord is not good

@PureNomad
9 hours ago
Tom is still my best friend

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
data base got hacked long ago

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
haha

scoobyburn
9 hours ago
government data bases get hacked

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
they can play snake

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
yeah nokia 3310s

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
Then should just make smart phones illegal for people under 16, just give them old style flippers

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@JoeBorackOBiden
and gave us all a hecking laugh

M88
9 hours ago
see could have been packing heat, how is he to know.

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
HE had every right to do that

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
She has the helium physiognomy voice

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Fuentes lives in a nice area…cops would back him up

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Blair – get it together

@TASMANIANDEVIL
9 hours ago
Depends on the state

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
glass ceiling? it’s brick, bitch

@Bamzal
9 hours ago
its technically in direct reference to abortion rights and thats it, but you can run wild with the implications

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
It was a troll and hilarious

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
he got doxed first

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Marla Rose

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
^

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago
BASED SHIRT

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
don’t let it happen again Blair..

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Trump will monitor the situation, only 2 weeks until free speech

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
twitter already 13+ age

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
odd how only Corperate submissions are published

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
unblock me on poa.st, you want to talk shit dont do it so i cant respond

@david_smith
10 hours ago
BLAIR YOU ARE MUTED

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
Van is secretary of Ukraine Club…got busted wearing Galacia patch

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
Lidia Thorpe got him…Van

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago

@JoeBorackOBiden
I like the cleaner cut

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
your a low life maggot claiming innocence and your far from it.

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
lol

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago
I like the shirt

@joeldavis

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
fucking cunt*

@TASMANIANDEVIL
9 hours ago
Castle doctrine?

@Bamzal
9 hours ago
i heard she pressed charges not sure tho

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
nicky had a sperg out haha

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
your a literal pos

@Bamzal
9 hours ago
trump managed to do one thing right, which is blocking both first female presidents

scoobyburn
9 hours ago
na, who put that bell button in,, shocking

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
Murdoch Murdoch had the funniest take on Fuentes

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
fuck off faggot

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Marla Rose

@RedemptionDenied
9 hours ago
shame fuentes is a mexican twink

@david_smith
10 hours ago
I think I’m going to live where there is only 3G service and not buy Skynet from Elon

PaperBeatsRock
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
yeah, you really are an utter shit cunt

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
keep projecting you fucking you are finished.

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
Ban the Commie Fist? Ban the Middle Finger? Ban the o7 Salute?

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
you are a subversive lying piece of shit midwit larping as a “smart person” you support flood, nnr, drilla, logos, that all the proof anyone needs

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago

@Bamzal
Graf is Based, NNR is a faggot

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
that financial stuff is for scam baiting etc

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago
Speech doesn’t physically harm anyone, this is jew faggy commie shit saying speech harms

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
prove any of these claims u unhinged, stalking loser hahaha, keep seething, fags… whoa
More

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
GRAF OWNER OF POA.ST CHANGING NNR’S HANDLE BECAUSE HE WAS SICK OF THE COMPLAINTS NNR’S WOULD SEND TO POA.ST ABOUT OTHER PEOPLE
Less

@david_smith
10 hours ago
I doubt Joel gives a fuck about which brown people you prefer between HT and tuber

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
Less

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
I’m all good…I just come for the fellowship with like minded white people ….I’m not one to follow or idolize …I don’t toss my shekles at them either so no skin off my ass if some streamers are disingenuous grifters…keep things in proper perspective

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
cant prove it hey faggot, hold up i got more!!!

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
NNR COMPLAING TO ODYSEE ON TWITTER G
Less

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
FLOOD DOXING RANGO DINGBOT G
Less

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago

@david_smith
yea guilty

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
most of the media contacting you are just testing you

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
ohhh really faggot

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago
Drew PAvlou is an absolute faggot and he is not an Aussie

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@JoeBorackOBiden
You are doing timeslot war on Joel you cunt

Johnny Bags
10 hours ago
They wanna be able to write that you didnt respond to their request for comment, in their hit piece article

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
losers search streams in incognito mode just to seethe n talk shit they can’t prove… sad losers… seriously, sad

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@HitlersGhost
yes spy hunter and drilla have been doxing randbot, regardless what you think of rand, its wrong.

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago
proximity certainly does breed contempt

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
lol ^

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
You lick NNRs nuts like a fag, funny you say other people have a hard on for you

@fleabittenrat
10 hours ago
any jeet you find, i’ll find a white that can do better

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
Pressure valves. Don’t waste your $ being political ffs

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
Spy Hunter is on his dick too now I see

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@HitlersGhost
Move to a rural area

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago
SAME SHIT IN AMERICA

@joeldavis

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
hilarious what that mentally ill faggot has a hard on for me, what a homo… actually searches to find me even though he blocked smh

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago
my city is now about 18% white …fucking depressing total beaner take over

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Roberts is a bit like David Icke, he really doesn’t get it, but is right occasionally.

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
chain reaction supports nnr’s subversive grifting

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@HitlersGhost
100% so is chain reaction

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
Roberts is pretty good in Estimates

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
NNR is a faggit

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Qld has state controlled by LNP, we should lobby for a minister for White Men, as they have a minister for specifically excluding White men.

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
g
More

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
g
More

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
supports the doxxing, banning and de-plattforming of white natsocs, he wants jews (Dbot) in the natsoc cause

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago
I fucking hate Whites who support immigration…our quality of life is degraded and big business benefits …crooked politicians too I would imagine as a diverse fractured population is easier to deceive and control

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
subversive

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
Watch out for

@ChainReaction
he is a lying subverisive piece of shit

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
this you faggot – g
Less

@fleabittenrat
10 hours ago
take away the gibs and they’ll leave

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
all the Jeets cheat on exams

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@HitlersGhost
It is Aussie version of naturalization act

scoobyburn
10 hours ago
70% of new home builds are rented by international students

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago
yeah, get them out

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Also our universities are garbage, I would hate to think what they are like in worse places.

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago

@david_smith
Wet ass Pussy??

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
Didn’t you listen to Woodlander?

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Retrospective WAP would be cool

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Pauline Hanson also went in ahijab thing to show solidiarity with muslims.

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
Less

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
Limbrick is Juice

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
abortion is not complicated…its become an industry which is used as Political policy…quiet easy to not get pregnant in 2024

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
Yeah mainly a wedge issue, where the centrist is correct.

ChainReaction
10 hours ago

@david_smith
tis a complicated topic, our prob tends to be that now it pushed like a right of passage by loons

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
I guess my opinion is that abortion should be available, it is just that people should be in a healthy state and not have any use for in in normal situations.

@fleabittenrat
10 hours ago
teacher owned by student

ChainReaction
10 hours ago

@david_smith
smh…

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
the + is animals…wtf

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
Iknew someone who starved themselves to kill their baby to avoid getting an abortion. Even abos knew how to do abortions using drugs.

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
nuke it

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
if those whore had that kind of discipline, abortion wouldn’t be an issue…

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
forced sterilisation was court ordered in 28 states of US – way before Nazi heard of it

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Eugenic abortion is fine IMO, just not forced

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Capsicum spray is illegal as a self defense in Australia, but you can use habernero oil on your food.

@fleabittenrat
10 hours ago
it’s great for niglets

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
yeah, Zyklon it up brah

Bianca Fights The Zombies
10 hours ago
o/o/

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
Zyklon pepper spray

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
acid is better

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
lol, was looking for that t-shirt

DOLO
10 hours ago
excellent edit lol

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Oh naur muh peaceful invaders

@RockyTas
10 hours ago
WP

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Weaker than I think? How often do they win strongman competitions?

@NATIONAL-SAXONIST
10 hours ago
o/

DOLO
10 hours ago
Have you got a great title for me? Yes sir i do!

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
Achtung

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
11 hours ago
o/

ChainReaction
11 hours ago
great title o/

@katana17
12 hours ago

Joel Davis – One Nation – Ineptitude or Controlled Opposition? – Nov 4, 2024 – Transcript

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript