Aaron Spreadbury: Steve Laws is well known across the Right-wing sphere. He has a laudable track record, with many years behind him, of publicly confronting the mass migration issue. He is extremely outspoken and is particularly active on Twitter where he has somehow managed to not get banned. But his best work, I think, is his Dover documentary videos where he filmed illegal migrants arriving. It was a simple thing to do, but it gained the public crucial awareness that has layered with other efforts since to build the growing awareness of the problem that threatens us.

 

Being in the public eye, however, has not been without its cost. He has been subjected to all manner of attacks, from slander and defamation to being outright arrested and prosecuted, often for things that would not be considered criminal at all if someone else was to do it. None of these ever stick, of course, but it’s the process itself that is the punishment. They have dragged him through the system over and over, and it has only served to galvanise him.

 

Steve has done excellent work in highlighting the gross hypocrisy of the system. His activities have invigorated nationalist sentiment and his aggressive journalistic methods have earned him the moniker of “ The Migrant Hunter ”. He has also acquired the usual tags of racist, anti-semite and White supremacist, but they don’t sound quite so cool!

 

So please welcome to the stage, Steve Laws!

 

[loud applause]

 

Steve Laws: All right, so I’m assuming most of you guys never thought you’d see me back here, but I am very grateful to be back here. Thanks, Mark, for inviting me back. Looking in front of me right now, this is the clearly the largest nationalist organisation in the country. It’s not even close.

 

[applause]

 

So thank you for having me to speak. Mark’s asked me to speak on re-migration. I’m assuming most of you guessed that anyway, The Migrant Hunter! Thank you for that. [laughing] I suppose it’s quite a classy nickname. At the time I wasn’t so keen, but now I’m probably leaning into it a little bit.

 

But let me get started. So, like the Africans, … Yes, I know another Martin Luther King quote. Like the Africans, I have a dream! But my dream’s a little bit better. My dream is to see millions and millions of immigrants removed from our country!

 

[loud cheering and applause]

 

Some people may get a little bit uncomfortable when you use this language, but the reality is, without millions of people being removed from this country, we are not going to have a future for our people. Our children are going to grow up as hated minorities. And that to me is unacceptable. I do not care if these people came over illegally. I do not care if they came over legally. I do not care if they were born here. I do not care if their grandparents were born here! These people have to leave! This is not their land. This is ours. And we will not tolerate it!

 

[loud applause]

 

So re-migration, what is it? To simplify, remigration is the act and or process of returning immigrants to their country of origin.

 

Now, there are a number of people and organisations that will tell you re-migration is only deporting the illegal immigrants and the foreign criminals and voluntary repatriation. That is a lie! That is not what re-migration is! Remigration is reversing our demographic decline by any means necessary. There is no person in this country that does not belong here that has the right to demographically replace us. We will not tolerate that under any circumstances!

 

So why is it important? Why is re-migration important? I think it’s clear to see that without re-migration we are seriously in an awful lot of trouble. The problems are clear as day. Children getting raped, people getting murdered. These aren’t just rare occurrences. These are everyday situations. And these are happening by immigrants. They’re not just happening by illegal immigrants. These are legal immigrants imported by our government. Many of these have been born here. And they’re allowed to roam our streets, rape, murder and steal off our people. And we are not going to tolerate it anymore. We want every single one of these people removed from our country. It’s not going to happen voluntary. And unfortunately, this isn’t going to be a peaceful process for a lot of people. There is going to be an awful lot of hardship for our own people and for the immigrants involved through re-migration. But the alternative is far worse!

 

I do not want my children growing up as a hated minority in their own country. I do not want my children to have to look over their shoulder when they sit on a bus. I do not want my children to have to live in fear. That to me is unacceptable. I will spend the rest of my life campaigning to make sure these people are removed so our people have a future. I do not care about the smears. I do not care about the labels thrown at me. Call me racist, call me a Nazi, call me an anti-semite. I couldn’t care less! I really couldn’t! Because at the end of the day, our people come first! That is our priority. Our people are our family and we will not tolerate it.

 

So there are a number of organisations that campaign and call for re-migration. I used to be a member of one of them called the Homeland Party. Boo! Yes, I know! So these parties, they will tell you that re-migration is only voluntary. It’s not! Okay. And these people, they’re trying to pretend not to be radicals, they’re trying to hide who they are. Do not hide who you are. Be proud of who you are! I stand in front of my face, out my name, out. I do not care. I want these people gone from my country. I’m planting my flag in the sand. I’m not moving. And we will move the public to our position.

 

For time and time again, for decades now, nationalists have always used the argument of:

 

“ We’ve got to move to the middle ground! We’ve got to welcome the normal people, let’s open our arms to them, let’s water the message down a little bit, we’ll gain more support! ”

 

It’s a lie, it’s a pipe dream! It doesn’t happen!

 

[06:31]

 

The only way to get the people to accept what we want is to be unapologetic in opposition and drag them there! Without doing that, we will never get them there. And it’s as simple as that.

 

Some people are uncomfortable with my language, and I can understand, I do use tougher language than most people. But our people have been under a spell. They’ve been hypnotized for decades! And they need to be radicalised and they need to be radicalised fast. And the only way to do that is through vigorous propaganda. And unfortunately, that’s where we’re at at the moment. Our people need waking up. And it sounds cliche:

 

“ Oh, we need to wake our people up! ”

 

But it’s not just a case of waking them up and they’re red pilled now and they understand all of these questions. No! Our people need to be woken up to the point where they are active on the street, they are campaigning, they are vigorously calling for what they demand and they’re not afraid to do. So because at the moment, our people are afraid to speak up. They’re afraid they’re going to lose their job. I’ve been through it myself. I’ve lost jobs, I’ve had my house raided multiple times, I’ve been arrested, I’ve been put through false charges, all for speaking about immigration. Most of those were when I was only talking about illegal immigration, which is mostly a civic nationalist position at the best! It’s not even extreme to say that illegal criminals shouldn’t be in our country. That’s a basic common sense position.

 

So nationalists need to plant their flag in the sand. They need to be unapologetic and they need to stand there and say:

 

“ Enough is enough. This is where we’re at. This is what we want. And we do not apologise for who we’re proud to be nationalists, we love our country, and we do not care what these traitors and these foreign subversives have to say about that this is England. This is Britain. This is our land, not theirs! ”

 

[loud applause]

 

And then there’ll be other. There’ll be other movements such as UKIP, and the Tommy Robinson crowds. And these people will tell you that:

 

“ It’s fine if they integrate. It’s okay. They go down the pub, they drink a beer! ”

 

But integration is a lie! These people do not integrate. It’s a myth! Whether you’ve got Sikhs and Hindus or you’ve got Muslims or jews, they all live in their own little communities. They all keep amongst their own. They shop at their own stores, they send their children to their own schools, they speak their own languages, they stick amongst their own, which I do not blame them. So I would only want to be around English people.

 

But the point is, this is our land! And they’re now being given away pockets of our country to foreigners who have no right to it. Not only that, these people hate us and despise us for what our ancestors done in bettering the world. And a simple fact is that they do not belong here. And you can beat around the bush and you can say:

 

“ We’ve got a nice immigrant. This geezer is nice. This one’s fine. He’s against the illegals. ”

 

It means nothing! At the end of the day, they all have to go. We need to reverse the demographic decline. When I was born in 1991, the demographics were 95% White British, roughly. So in my lifetime, I’ve watched the demographics decline down to around 74% at the last census. But if we’re all being obvious, I’d say we’re around 70, 69% of the population now. So in my lifetime, I’ve witnessed severe decline. I am literally a product of what they’ve created.

 

So what can we do to campaign for re-migration?

 

Now, there’s the argument we could start a party. We could start a new party. We’re campaigning on re-migration. I’m telling you right now, it’s a waste of time. I’ve been there, I’ve done it, and it doesn’t work! Not only that, once you become a party, you cannot become radical. You cannot push the envelope. You cannot move people to our positions. The only reason we have, people like Rupert Lowe echoing our talking points is because we’ve been unapologetic in our position. We’ve created a pathway for these people to move in. This is why we need our radicals. We need people to drag the window as far as possible so the politicians can move into another, safer position and say:

 

“ Okay, it’s safe to call a deportation of the Boris Wave. Now we can call for deportation of legal immigrants because now that pathway has been made accessible by nationalists. ”

 

But it will never be made accessible if everyone is too busy saying:

 

“ No, we need to meet with the middle grounds. We’ve got to water down our message. Let’s not scare away the normies. ”

 

No, let’s scare them! Because what our future is going to be like is terrifying! I do not want my children raped. I do not want my children killed. I do not want my friends and family to live in a country where they have to look over their shoulder and live in fear. And that’s the direction we are going.

 

[11:10]

 

I’m quite lucky where I live in the country. I live in the southeast. The demographics are okay. I live near the seaside. There’s not too many immigrants about. But some of you guys live in these big cities and you cannot even get on public transport without fearing for your life. If you walk around as an open nationalist in a very multicultural, multiracial area, your life is very much at risk.

 

Many of us here have had incidents where immigrants have either tried to attack us or with the support of the state and groups like Antifa and Hope Not Hate and Searchlight and so forth. Our addresses have been doxed, our locations have been given away, our lives have been put in danger. This all happens because we’re calling for re-migration and mass deportations. And why are we calling for this? Because we want to protect our people. That’s the only goal in this.

 

We’re not going around saying:

 

“ We want to deport these people because we don’t like them! ”

 

It’s irrelevant whether we like them or not. It’s not personal. It’s necessary.

 

So what we need to do is build for 2030. Reform has the next election won. It would be suicidal and stupid for any nationalist to stand against them at that time. What we have to do is campaign and pressure these candidates who, many of them are sympathetic to our message. Of course, Reform will never be our guys. I was in the party. I was kicked out for calling Sunak an Indian. This is how ridiculous the party is! [chuckling] But if we get a Reform government and they do deport the illegal immigrants and they remove some foreign criminals, it gives us an extra year or two. It’s not great, it’s not perfect, and it’s not a huge strategy.

 

But dragging these politicians to our position is important. Because as soon as these politicians move to our position, the public follows them. The public doesn’t follow us because we’re scary to them. They look around at us and they go. They’ve got no real world influence. Despite everyone echoing our talking points. They’ve got no money behind them, they’ve got no infrastructure. Which is true. Sorry, which is true. We haven’t got any infrastructure. We haven’t got vehicles to just call them. We haven’t got a huge amount of manpower.

 

So that’s where our time needs to be. That’s where our energy needs to be. In this hall now we have over 200 people. By next year it should be 500 people. This is the approach we should be. Nationalists need to come out and stand together. So by 2030, when Reform get into government, we can hold their feet to the fire. We have to use a similar logic and approach that Momentum used within Labour. That’s an approach we have to take.

 

Now, re-migration has been done before, although in very small terms. Even today it’s happening in Pakistan, they’re deporting Afghans. In America, they’re running around rounding up illegals. Although the numbers are very vague, it’s still happening, which shows you there is an appetite for this, even under populist leaders.

 

But make no mistake, we have a very long way to go. Only under this Labour government, from July 24 to July 25, only a mere 35,000 people have been deported. That’s 25, 937 voluntary and 9, 115 forced. That’s pathetic! That’s ridiculous! We’ve had more than that come over just illegally through the dinghies, let alone the millions that are flooding in through the borders.

 

But the fact that Labour governments are deporting people, the fact that Labour governments are entering and using our rhetoric, sure, they don’t believe in it. They never will! They’re not even going to implement it. But the people listening to them believe it. The normal people sitting at home watching the news, when they hear the Prime Minister say:

 

“ We’re living in an island of strangers. ”

 

And then they walk through town and all they can see is browns and blacks and all sorts of foreigners. And it’s clear as day what is happening. It’s clear as day that we are an island of strangers. When I was younger, there was a sense of community. Where I grew up, I grew up in a council estate in Folkestone. Everyone was White British. We had a couple of Irish or so forth. But overall it was a very homogenous society. I could go into any person’s house on my street and we could all go in, we could have a cup of tea, you could make a drink. No one would care. Everyone would look out for each other.

 

But now, in the same estate, it’s full up with foreigners. No one even talks to their neighbours. The kids are not playing outside the front. It’s a completely different community. And that’s changed in the space of 30 years. What’s going to happen in another 30 years? Where is England and Britain going to be? And Scotland and Wales? Where are they going to be in a hundred years? Are we even going to exist as a people or are we going to play the minority game? Are we going to play the minority game in our country and be hated minorities and beg for crumbs off the table? Or are we going to say:

 

“ No, we want the whole lot! We are not begging for crumbs. This is our country! We’re taking the lot! ”

 

So essentially, the borders are still open, millions are flooding in, and the solution is re-migration. Remigration is what we want. Remigration is what everyone needs. You can call it mass deportations, you can call it expulsion, you can call it what you want, I do not care.

 

[16:07]

 

But ultimately, this is what we need. And there are ways to force politicians to adopt your talking points. So it sounds a bit silly, but the communist approach is relentless propaganda of pushing a message and throwing it down people’s throats consistently. That’s what I’ve done for the last year and a half of re-migration. Not to sort of toot my own horn a little bit, but the term “ re-migration ” was not even a word in the UK really, in terms of the political scene a year and a half ago, until we adopted the stance and dragged it through the window and forced it into the most popular position in the country now.

 

It’s a similar approach I took when I used to film the illegals down at Dover. So I’d stand there every day, consistently:

 

“ Just film the boats. Another boat’s coming today. Show the numbers. Another boat’s coming today. Show the numbers! ”

 

Consistently. Every day, repeating the same talking points until people are sick of it and they don’t want to hear it! And then carry on some more because they need to hear the solution. Everyone talks about the problems, everyone knows what’s at stake! Everyone knows what direction we go in. Let’s talk about the solutions. Let’s offer real world solutions to the people.

 

Yes, re-migration is not going to happen without our guys in power. But here’s a tough pill that Nationalists are going to have to take. We’re not going to be the guys that implement re-migration. We’re going to be the ones that influence those that do. And this is where we have to understand our position in this movement. We are not all going to get elected and we’re going to take a government and we’re going to be the majority in the House of Commons. I would love it! Every single one of us would.

 

But we have to live in the real world. The real world is. A lot of these politicians are sympathetic. I won’t name names, but a lot of MPs reach out to me privately, members of the House of Lords, famous commentators and news politicians and whatever you want to call them. All of these people reach out to me and ask for information about mass deportations and re-migration. They send me their posts and ask:

 

“ Is that okay to say? ”

 

Like, a lot of these people are entering a area of politics that they’re not used to, they’re not comfortable with. We’ve entered a new land. Before nationalists have always been apologizing and saying:

 

“ I’m sorry, I’m a Nationalist, I’m sorry, I want my country back. ”

 

No more! This is what we need to do. We need to be tough, unapologetic and radical! No more sensible nationalism, no more Kenny Smith nonsense! [chuckling] We need real Nationalists, we need real world change and we need thousands of Nationalists! It’s no good celebrating that. Yes, I’ve just launched re-migration now. We’ve got around 550 members, but that’s nothing to celebrate. Sure, it’s great! I’ve got five hundred and fifty guys that want to come out and campaign, but I need 50,000 guys! I don’t need 500 guys. And this is where we need to be. We need to be building. We need to be building infrastructure, gaining funds, buying property, buying vehicles.

 

So when anything happens in the country, we’ve got the manpower to send a coach of Nationalists to one place or we’ve got the manpower to go:

 

“ Okay, a nationalist house is just burned down. We’re going to send 30 guys to go and help them. ”

 

This is how we can make real world change. But at the moment there’s so many different organisations, there’s so many different groups. This is one of the main reasons I’m here today, Mark invited me to speak and I want to show a true show of unity. I’m not a member of PA. I probably won’t join as a member of PA. That doesn’t mean I don’t like you guys, but I have my own vision of campaigning on re-migration. That’s my main priority.

 

All of these other organisations, I won’t name all the other ones, but we all need to come together as a collective. We don’t have to be under the same banner and everyone follows orders from this guy or this guy because that’s a pipe dream and it’s never going to happen. But we can collaborate, we can work together, we can work on projects together, we can make campaigns together. We can share resources, we can share money. If someone’s got a vehicle, but another person’s got a venue, we can work together. Here’s no reason why we can’t. We’re all in this together. It’s our country and we all want the same thing.

 

So when it comes back to re-migration, people always get terrified and they say:

 

“ What about my mixed race cousin? Or what about my friends from the Congo? ”

 

I don’t care, okay? You may be upset, you may be unapologetic about that, but I simply do not care! Your emotional baggage and your skin in the game does not mean the whole country has to collapse because you’ve made a decision. That’s your choice of what you’ve made, and now you’re going to have to deal with it, unfortunately. There are going to be tough decisions that need to be made. I don’t expect everyone to take the radical stance that I take. But you have to be calling for deportations! You have to be calling for the removal of legal immigrants! And you have to be calling for it consistently!

 

Whenever you talk to a politician, a journalist, even a random activist, anyone in the street, talk about re-migration, tell them the solution. Tell them you do not have to live this. You do not have to walk down in your own streets looking over your shoulder, fearing for your life and your family’s life and your safety of the whole country. You shouldn’t have to live this. It’s absolutely ridiculous!

 

So plant your flag in the sand and demand total re-migration. Not a little bit of re-migration, not one or two, not a couple of million, all of them! Every single one!

 

[loud applause]

 

[21:27]

 

Because we are radical. And the things we’re proposing are radical. And this is what you have to understand. Don’t lie to people and say:

 

“ Oh, it’s not so bad. It’s going to be fine. Nothing bad’s going to happen. ”

 

Of course, it’s going to be a bit of a hardship. We’re going to be removing millions of people. There’s going to be some economic turmoil, there’s going to be a lot of changes taking place. But it’s either that or we lose our homelands. And which would you rather? Let’s be clear. Would you rather hurt the feelings of a few people? A couple of good guys may get caught up in the madness, or we lose our homeland. We have nowhere else to return. Because we have nowhere to run to. We have nowhere else that we can go for safety. There’s nobody in the world that is going to save us. Nobody’s going to come and protect us. It’s on us as a people. It’s on us!

 

So we can either willow away, apologise, be all nice and calm, try and get some crumbs off the table, or we can say:

 

“ No, we want the lot! We’re not giving in and we’re taking everything! ”

 

So essentially we need re-migration now. And I’m going to leave you with this because I feel like this man, he’s a great man anyway. But the quote is very fitting and it follows me daily. So it’s all there, it’s all waiting. Of course it can be done. It depends upon ourselves. And that sticks with me every single day. Because it can be done! Nothing is impossible! People will tell you that:

 

“ You can’t remove those people. You can’t deport millions of people! But you can import millions of people, that’s fine, but you can’t remove them. ”

 

So stand your ground, hold your line in your position. Total re-migration! Millions have to go!

 

Thank you.

 

[long loud applause]

 

[23:30]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 10/12/2025 = 10)

JamesL
3 days ago
” This is the difference between Steve and some of the other speeches we’ve seen recently.
You can tell he doesn’t particularly like public speaking, you can tell it doesn’t come naturally to him, but it’s a great speech because you can tell he means everything he’s saying and it all comes from the heart.
Total patriot and I’ll always have his back until the end. One of the only guys with a platform on here who truly gets it.
We’ve made massive strides together with our fellow patriots over the past year or so and we’ll continue doing so. We’re the drummers of Remigration and we’re going to keep on drumming until everyone gets the message and propagates the message.
Give it a watch. Great job Steve.
TOTAL REMIGRATION.”
~ Zoomer Historian
Less

9
0
FunnyCool&Epic
3 days ago
MILLIONS :clapping_hands:
Europe will be white again!

6
0
ThinRedLine
3 days ago
good speech , yes millions must go

5
0
Edelweiß
2 days ago(edited)
But do the British have the prerequisite Morality to make millions go? The barrier which prevented Britain from staying British is the same barrier which will prevent Britain from becoming British again. It’s in the minds of the British. It’s Liberal/Christian/Slave Morality. Are you going to Hate your enemies? Are you going to Love your enemies? Are you going to destroy your enemies and take the land? Are you going to sacrifice yourself and share the land? The Israelis are currently demonstrating the Morality it takes. What is your Morality? The solution isn’t going to be clean or political.

1
1
Hide replies
Avalon
1 day ago
There is nothing moral or analogous about Israel bombing a neighbouring country into rubble. Remigration is telling people to go home.

Love & Division
3 days ago
Unless you first remigrate the Jews who are controlling the war-on-withes you will be opposed.

2
0
Dawn Browning
3 days ago
Well said & done, our Steve

2
0

@filled_soda
2 days ago
Great stuff, Steve

1
0
Htrac
2 days ago
Millions must leave. :clapping_hands:
Steve has been instrumental in shifting the public conversation towards remigration, and it’s working.

1
0
Alice1488
1 day ago
Powerful no nonsense speech Steve. Well done

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: Anyway, that was last Saturday in Melbourne at the Chinese consulate in Toorak. Some of the boys went down there and decided to burn some Chinese flags and pictures of Mao, some pictures of President Xi, and demand the extradition of the Chinaman who threw scolding hot coffee on a White baby. A nine month old White baby in a racially motivated hate crime I think quite clearly, before getting on a plane to China to escape justice due to his frustration at having his permanent visa application denied.

 

So, yeah, that was a bit of fun, but I hope you’re all ready for another show [Nov 4, 2024]. I decided to play that because it has been over a week since we’ve done a show. On Thursday night I wanted to do a Halloween special, but Jacob Hersant wrote me into his clan rally.

 

So that was a lot of fun. Unfortunately, the content that Jacob made, which was hilarious by the way, maybe I should play Jacob’s video actually, his Halloween special Hersant clip. I think it seems to have got the [word unclear] Hersant Twitter account banned. He is appealing the suspension, but of in the chat for Jacob because that kind of sucks!

 

But anyway, it’s great to have Blair back. Obviously we sent you on a mission over to the mother country to go and represent Australia at the Patriotic Alternative Conference. Obviously Mark Collett, friend of the show hosted you. He hosted me last year. So a supreme gentleman. And I watched your speech*. You spoke well as usual and the crowd seemed to love it, I think. I mean, you’re a very impressive man to meet in real life. I think they would have loved having the chance to shake hands with Blair Cottrell at the conference. So I’m sure they were pretty stoked to have you. But what was your impressions? Not just of the conference, but of the old country in general, because it’s the first time you’ve ever been, obviously, so.

[* See: Patriotic Alternative – Hope is Our Duty – Blair Cottrell’s 2024 PA Conference Speech – Oct 19, 2024 – Transcript]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, I have many impressions and it depends on where you go in England. It’s a bigger country than I expected and it takes longer to travel across one side to the other. A lot longer than I expected. London feels like an abandoned empire overrun by foreign forces. Cornwall, though, that’s quite beautiful. But I think it’s a bit of a holiday resort and there’s a lot of like trendy White people out there. And it’s so often the case that when you get majority White suburban area, they’re all really Left-wing because they’ve never seen ethnic diversity and what it actually does to a community. So in order to feel good about themselves, they’re always promoting multiculturalism and diversity and every Left-wing programme they can think of just as a virtue signal. And that seems to be happening out in Cornwall, New Quay, which is the southwest of England. Apologies for my voice, by the way. I’ve been really jet lagged because the flights are very long. I didn’t sleep at all on the flights. Then I got a little bit sick after getting home, probably from the people that were surrounding me on the planes.

 

But I’m going to do a bit of a debrief maybe in the next few days. So I won’t say too much now, but it is a beautiful country, full of great architecture. But like I said, it does have that abandoned empire feel, like the best of us abandoned it long ago. And ever since then it’s just been kind of overrun. And I came back with one thought regarding England, regarding just the state of England. It made me think of nationhood generally.

 

And I realised that racism is essential to maintaining nationhood. That if you have a country that’s not racist, it’s not going to stay a country for long, it’s not going to stay your country for long. That racial discrimination is sort of a necessary facet of any nation.

 

And as a result of that, well, we can see in England that laws against racial discrimination have made the English people, have made it illegal for them to be necessarily racist to protect their own identity. And you can really feel that in England. It’s like they have a lot more hate crime there, I think. Hate speech. And everyone’s worried about saying the wrong thing.

 

But look, I was hosted by some great people up in the Midlands, by Mark and Patriotic Alternative. And I really enjoyed the conference, but I’m still a little bit scattered. You know, my thoughts and experiences, they’re still overlapping each other. And I’m trying to organise it inside my mind so I can get a good perspective of England and how it relates to Australia. But I was happy to be home.

 

But what do you think of England, Joel? You’ve been there.

 

Joel Davis: Have you been to England, Tom, as a boy? Because obviously your father’s English.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I went when I was 16.

 

Joel Davis: What were your impressions?

 

Thomas Sewell: I’d never met a gypsy before until I went to England. So oh, sorry, no, that was France. I went to Paris and London at the same time and York and it was. Yeah, I was 16, so I wasn’t very political. I was surprised that there were niggers in Paris, genuinely. I was also very surprised at the demographics of London. And it wasn’t even anywhere near as bad as it is now. I mostly did just kind of basic touristy stuff.

 

And if you do touristy stuff anywhere, the demographic is going to be bad.

 

So I can’t really comment much on England back in 2009, I wasn’t there long enough. If I was going to go on holiday somewhere and I was kind of sad that you spent such little time in England. I would want to go for like a month at least. I feel that you’d have to fully. I know it sounds kind of cringe, but you’d have to like fully immerse and see as much as you can. You know, it is expensive going over there.

 

[06:45]

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: I mean, you didn’t get more time.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, and I didn’t stay for long enough. I think I was only there for a total of eight full days. And considering, …

 

Thomas Sewell: You were so busy and moving and adjusting.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s just a schedule the entire time.

 

But look, I’m glad I got to see it. Glad I got to see the motherland. The architecture was the best I’ve ever seen, the most impressive. And I saw some really cool castles, very old cathedrals in Winchester, which I was surprised to learn is the original capital of England. It was never like an official capital, but it was the main city before William the Conqueror declared London the capital in 1066. And Winchester is just so old! Everything in England is so old. I’m not really used to that because we’re in such a young country and most of the infrastructure architecture here is kind of recently built.

 

And interestingly, there’s a place in London that looks exactly like Flinders Street, but on larger scale where this bridge goes across a little river. And I realised that a lot of the architecture is kind of emulated parts of London. The architecture in Australia is emulating parts of London. It has a real British character in Australia. And you can appreciate that once you go back to England and see where we come from.

 

But yeah, there’s a lot to say. There are a lot of Africans in London. And unfortunately I booked accommodation in a place called Kennington because it looked pretty affluent when I was looking at the various hotels there. Then when I got there, I just smelled marijuana everywhere all the time. And I don’t like marijuana. It like sets alarm bells off in my brain. I’ve had some bad experiences with that stuff.

 

So I’m like, whoa, who’s smoking weed? And then I noticed children, like black children running around, like screaming, crying, with no shoes on. Then there was like homeless people. And then I realised there’s black people walking down the street smoking weed just in public. And one of them was abusing a bus driver. And, well, I won’t get into it, but yeah, like, I had some pretty eye opening experiences. It’s pretty alarming the state that England’s at. Joel went over there last year. Did you spend much time in London when you were there last year, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I was in London for about two weeks, I think in total, I spent a couple months in Britain. And yeah, London is a fucking shit hole! Part of the time I was staying in London, I stayed in Clapham, which is a little bit more of a wider area, and that was more chill. I mean, it’s not a particularly nice area. But the tube trip to the city is quite short.

 

So if you want to go into the middle of the city to do kind of touristy stuff, it’s not a bad spot. It was recommended to me by a friend of mine who’s actually from London who said that’s a good place to find a cheapish, like affordable Airbnb where you’re not surrounded by like Pakis or negroes or something. And he was right about that.

 

But yeah, London is a hole.

 

I mean, I did appreciate seeing some of the sites, going to the art gallery and the museums and seeing some of the classics like:

 

“Oh, there’s Big Ben! etc.”

 

Blair Cottrell: But it’s not even that big, is it? Big Ben? It’s like Medium Ben. I thought it was bigger than that.

 

 

Joel Davis: It isn’t as impressive as Sydney or Melbourne, frankly, because it’s not just covered in huge skyscrapers because it’s all old buildings in a certain way. Like, it’s impressive in another sense because you can feel the history.

 

But I find that about European cities in general, they feel kind of small to me as an Australian, because Sydney and Melbourne, they’re just like massive metropolises. Or when I went to a New York, that was a whole different level. Like, it’s just literally a concrete jungle, just skyscrapers in every conceivable direction. And that’s not necessarily better. You know, I’m not saying that particularly Melbourne can be quite ugly, really, because of all these modernist takes on architecture, trying to be too eclectic and just it looks kind of disgusting a lot of the time.

 

But I digress. You know, I did love visiting Britain though, when I got out of London, when I went to some of the smaller towns in the countryside. Like, I enjoyed my time with Collett when I went there for the conference as well. That was only a short stay. But he took me to this castle out in the countryside somewhere. And that was a fun visit because that was really old. That was like over a thousand years old or something. I am sad that I never got down to go to, … Did you go to Stonehenge because you were nearby? Did you end up going?

 

[11:33]

 

Blair Cottrell: No, I just didn’t get the time. The two places I went to that I was., … They’re kind of like the best memories other than the conference. Like, we’ve got some great guys over in England, like great nationalists. They’re looking after the native population there and representing the native population well. I got to meet a lot of those people, shake hands with them. It was really cool!

 

But other than the conference, St. Michael’s Mount, which is. I posted some photos of it. It’s an old castle on an island. And there’s a granite man made pathway leading to the island. But the pathway becomes completely submerged during high tide. So you can only access the island by foot during certain times during low tide. Otherwise you have to go by boat. That was a really nice castle. I’m pretty sure some of the family who owns that castle is still living there in some part of it. But they open up another part of it for tourism, but I’m not entirely sure.

 

Then there was Tintagel. I just thought that was a weird name for place Tintagel. But that had like a very stereotypical English cemetery from a long, long time ago. Like, it’s a very old cemetery and just real ancient vibes in Tintagel. There’s the remains of a castle there on a detached landmass that was once, I believe, bridged by a sort of like a natural land bridge. But now there’s an artificial bridge because that’s deteriorated over time. And there’s hardly anything left of this old castle. And it’s believed that King Arthur, who may or may not have been a king. Historians debate about it, but most historians agree that there was a character called Arthur that was significant in English history for various reasons.

 

[The ruins of Tintagel Castle]

 

But it’s believed by some historians that Arthur was either born or conceived in this particular castle. The remains of you can walk through into Tintagel and this attached landmass.

 

But that was my favourite part of the trip, getting down to the southwest and seeing the countryside. Man, the roads in England, they’re so narrow! Like, they’re so narrow that you have to stop to let someone go past you.

 

But I have to say everyone’s speeds in England and it’s glorious! I loved it! You get back to Australia and everyone’s just dawdling. Everyone’s driving so slow here. And in England, even though the traffic’s chaotic and the roads are small and people just park wherever they want, everyone’s more polite. They actually let you in and stop. And everyone drives really fast. Like, if you’re not speeding, get in the Left hand lane. Because in Australia we don’t have passing. We’re supposed to have passing lanes here, but we don’t. Just grannies and retards just dawdle in the right-hand lane and you can’t get anywhere any, like a good amount of time.

 

But I’ve got to say that’s one of my favourite things about England was how fast the traffic moves. It’s probably because it’s so chaotic, you need to like pay special attention, let people in so you don’t get in accidents and stuff like that.

 

Joel Davis: There’s kind of like an organic anarchy I felt about, about Britain. Like in Australia people are more kind of bureaucratic in their rule following. Where in, like Britain, everyone bends all of the official rules. Like in informal settings, like you’ll go to like a pub where technically you’re not supposed to smoke there, but they just let you do it anyway. Or you’re technically not supposed to take your drink out onto the street, but they let you do it anyway.

 

And then they just say:

 

“Oh, just put your drink behind your back if a cop drives past or something.”

 

Like they have these kinds of like:

 

“Oh, if there’s a rule that can be bent, they’ll bend it.”

 

But in Australia people can be like sticklers over that kind of thing, which is really gay, in my opinion. I did like that about Britain.

 

But one thing that I didn’t like about Britain was that, I don’t know, like, it feels as though when you’re an abrasive Australian, sometimes they don’t quite get it. Like some, they don’t really have exactly the same, … They have great banter, but they’re a little bit more like reserved and they don’t necessarily appreciate maybe like the vulgarity of like, of the kind of masculine Australian [chuckling] demeanor or something. Like they get a little offended. So I didn’t feel like, okay, well, maybe I don’t quite fit in here as much as I thought I did. Maybe I do belong back in my own country where I can be a little bit more vulgar and outrageous!

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. I didn’t really find that like there’s plenty of banter. They were very similar to us, but there’s a lot of different phenotypes that I’ve never seen before. Different types of White phenotypes, narrow faces, very skinny people, and not always skinny, but just different shapes, skeletal structures, muscular structures, face structures.

 

And I realised that there must be a lot of White phenotypes which never immigrated to Australia.

 

And as a result there’s just some certain lineages, White lineages, which I’ve never seen before until I went to England. Yeah, so that was interesting.

 

Joel Davis: So what do you think? As. Cause you’re really into physiognomy and you profile people quite well. I think on that. Because in my opinion, and this isn’t really trying to shit on the British people because there are Chads from there, but in my opinion the Chad ratio is lower. Like I’m just gonna say it. I’m not sure if that’s because we took immigrants from a lot of immigrants from Germany and Scandinavia and like Holland and so on that like bred in with our population or if it’s a selection pressure thing. Because this was actually noted, I think in World War I when the Australian soldiers rocked up to the battlefield. In World War I, you know, it was noted on both sides that the Australian soldiers were just like physically in better shape than their British counterparts.

 

[17:11]

 

Blair Cottrell: No one wanted to fight them. No one wanted to fight the Australian soldiers. They weren’t just big, they were vicious and had a reputation for it. What do you think, Tom? Why are the Aussies bigger?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I think two factors, selective breeding and environment. That’s obviously the basics of it. Selective breeding, I’d say that generally more risk taking, potentially more volatile hormones would cause people to emigrate and leave their home. That’s just a general rule. I think colonies have a habit of attracting rougher people, frontiersmen, people that aren’t satisfied with the sedentary lifestyle. There is for all Europeans I’ve heard that. Sorry, I’ve heard that Southern Europeans, for example, work more hours a week, but they don’t do as much work during those hours. Like it’s normal to have a 12 hour day, but like a two hour lunch.

 

Whereas we work like harder and faster I think in the north and northern hemisphere Europeans.

 

And so I think also colonies would probably attract different people. It’s probably more intense environment. You’re probably going there and you’re probably working harder. Because you’re against the Wilderness versus maybe like established economic or working habits. So that would breed a different kind of man and it would select for a different kind of man. I could imagine potentially in the early days, there was a lot of people that came over, like families that might have came over and not liked it and just gone and just went back. So that in itself creates that.

 

Secondly, just having more space meant more livestock per person and it meant cheaper meat.

 

So I think Australia and New Zealand in the year 1900 were the two wealthiest countries per capita in the world. Just in terms of just human development, in terms of access to meat, in terms of, yeah, just like wages. I’m pretty sure we were the two highest in the world. So on average. So that would contribute a lot to the diet. Better diet. English people don’t eat a very good diet and they’ve been industrialised and put in kind of big, big cities for a long time. So Australia only has become kind of degenerated in the last like 50 years.

 

So I think that would play a part.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s a good answer. I have basically the same opinion. It’s curious though, because there’s Greener pastures in England. The land there is more fertile and I noticed the dairy is quite good there. I would say the dairy is better than ours. I don’t know why though. Maybe because the pastures are so great! But we still, … It doesn’t make sense though, because we have better meat. Like, the beef over there kind of sucks! Well, I’m sure I can get a good steak from somewhere if I paid up for it. But like, it’s just understood that Australians have good beef.

 

Thomas Sewell: It is hard to say because a lot of the time the best meat gets sold to rich foreign countries. That’s a habit. Like my dad, obviously, even though he’s English, he lived in New Zealand for a long time. Hence everyone bullies me. And you know, he says that meat in New Zealand is shit, even though New Zealand produces the best livestock in the world. But he just says all the A grade stuff goes to China and the Middle East.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I’ve never seen greener pastures than when I was in England. The grass is just so lush.

 

Thomas Sewell: New Zealand and England, they’re on a different. Yeah, they’re on a different latitude or whatever it’s called longitude. [Latitude] Yeah. So it gets a lot greener there.

 

Joel Davis: The Bay of Plenty in New Zealand, I think. And I’ve been there. It’s so green. It’s like really stimulating in the sunshine because of just how potent the green is and everything. I believe it’s the most fertile soil anywhere in the world.

 

And I think that’s partly to do with all of the volcanic residue because obviously New Zealand is on a fault line, so that obviously produces a lot of fertility in the soil as well because of all the minerals that that brings up.

 

But yeah, it is weird! I found the same thing in England. The food wasn’t as good. I did have one recommendation. I think I told you. I don’t know if you took me up on it. If you are in London and you want a good steak, go to the Hippodrome.

 

Blair Cottrell: I forgot about that.

 

[Heliot Steak House, Hippodrome, London]

 

Joel Davis: You told me you forgot about. It’s unfortunate. Go to the Hippodrome. It’s like literally a couple streets over from Trafalgar Square. Go to Trafalgar Square, by the way, and take a look at the statue of my ancestor, Charles Napier. Absolute chad! He was the commander in chief of British forces in India back in the 19th century. Mogged the fuck out of the jeets. I think he basically conquered Pakistan, modern day Pakistan.

 

[Obelisk – Charles James Napier at Trafalgar Square]

 

Blair Cottrell: And relative of yours that fought Napoleon?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, he also led a battle against Napoleon. He did lose to Napoleon, but come on, everyone lost Napoleon. You got to give him some slack. He still was a hero in the Napoleonic Wars. He reconstituted forces and went back in, and by that time I think Napoleon was occupied with the Russians on the Eastern Front. So then he was having some success against the kind of B level French generals.

 

But yeah, anyway, yeah, head down to the Hippodrome. There is an Argentinian steak restaurant there that was fucking amazing when I went there, to be fair. And there’s a couple nice like, French restaurants and everything through, through London. But like, it’s because the French know what, you know, got to give the French credit. They know what they’re doing when it comes to fine dining or whatever.

 

But yeah, like the quality of eating out in Britain in general is just really low. I don’t know exactly why that is, but that’s what I found. But maybe you shouldn’t really be eating out too much, but when you’re on holiday you kind of have to because, you’re not at home, you’re doing things differently.

 

[23:00]

 

Blair Cottrell: I tried McDonald’s over there and I tried KFC. Both were really bad! I couldn’t even eat the Big Mac. The meat was so stale and old, I just threw it out. And KFC menu in England is weird! You get like these rice dishes where there’s rice and chopped up zinger and like some other stuff. You’d be interested in this Tom. There’s like all this salsa and rice and lettuce and mayonnaise just thrown on top of this zinger in a little box. And it’s like you eat the meat off the top and then the rest is like.

 

Joel Davis: Did you order them?

 

Thomas Sewell: Can I just ask you something? Why would I be interested in that?

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, you know like we used to talk much about, to some extent, about the macros in a zinger not being that bad. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: No comment. [chuckling] I heard a rumour that the KFC Tower Burger is back. But I’m not condoning anyone eats oxalob. This show is not paid or promoted by KFC.

 

Joel Davis: I saw you mention that in the group chat. I got one for dinner. It was amazing!

 

Thomas Sewell: I used to work at KFC when I was a kid. That’s probably why I’ve been teased about it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Entry level job, mate. You’ve got to have one. Everyone’s got to do it.

 

Thomas Sewell: It was honestly the best job ever had. We will organise nationalist KFC in the ethno-state. It’ll be like wholesome chungus KFC.

 

Blair Cottrell: Have you noticed how much better like McDonald’s KFC? How much better is it when like middle class White kids are preparing it? Yeah, like McDonald’s in Balwyn where Tom’s dad lives. Where is it in east? It’s in a relatively middle class area.

 

[Balwyn MacDonalds Melbourne]

 

Joel Davis: It’s just like dox Tom’s dad’s house on the stream. [chuckling] Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know but well I was just gonna say there’s a McDonald’s in this area and because there’s just like rich White kids working there every. It’s the most amazing McDonald’s you’ll ever have in your life. Everything’s so fresh all the time.

 

But you know you’re not gonna get the best burger when, …

 

Joel Davis: The young lads out there. If you’re young and you’re still figuring things out and you’re you know, in your late teens or something and you job on the side to make some cash, find a KFC with a lot of White girls working there. You know, if you’re single young man. You know there’s a lot of cute mids in the KFC drive through in some of the White areas. It’s a great you know, go get your $25 an hour, all the chicken you can eat and something else for dessert. [chuckling]

 

But anyway, I digress. No, I got to play Jacob’s video, and it’s just so funny. This is why you didn’t get an episode on Halloween, because we were messing around producing this. I’m sure everyone is a fan of the Hersant shorts. They’ve become notorious in the nationalist online scene. And this is probably my favourite one that he’s ever done.

 

KKK: Happy Halloween to every nigga hating night of the Ku Klux Klan.

Loyal Klansmen, we must swear an oath to continue this struggle for the survival of our race. Forged in the same spirit as General Lee, Stonewall Jackson and Nathan Bedford Forest. White Power!

KKK: There’s a nigger over there! Let’s go get him! No! Quick, get that nigger!

 

Blair Cottrell: [chuckling] Oh, man! You guys love to push boundaries, I’ll tell you.

 

Joel Davis: I mean, it’s comedy. I mean, the fact that Jacob got. Well, we don’t know exactly why he was banned. We suspect maybe it was that video. I mean, it’s a bit of fun on Halloween. Like, give us a break. It’s obviously not that serious. Shout out to Nathan Bull as well in the blackface. That was quite funny.

 

But, yeah, that was anyway, bit of fun. RIP [word unclear] Hersant. Hopefully he can get his Twitter account back on appeal.

 

Blair Cottrell: But where do you get the robe from? It looks like legit KKK robe.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. One of the boys is pretty good and pretty nifty with the Boy Scouts skills, so we managed to get that together.

 

But, yeah, that video was fun to make.

 

Thomas Sewell: I had a lot of Americans message me about it. I had a lot of Americans didn’t like the video. There’s some drama in America about the Klu Klux Klan. In Australia and in Europe, anyone that’s racist loves the KKK. Like, there are people on both sides of the Russian Ukrainian war that are racist that both have, like, Confederate flags and love the Ku Klux Klan. Like, it’s just like, universally, everyone in Europe that’s racist loves the KKK. And then likewise in Australia, we’re just like, yeah, it’s racist! It’s a racist gang. Sounds awesome!

 

But in America, obviously, they really divided on it. So, like, half of them are like:

 

“Oh the clan was great, but it’s not that good anymore!”

 

And then the other half are like:

 

“Oh, the Klan are jews! And the clan of Freemasons! And all the clan of Protestants!”

 

And I got all these direct messages saying:

 

“You gotta tell Jacob not to do the clan stuff. The clan’s really bad! Da da da da da!”

 

And I just replied:

 

“Look, in Australia, we’re allowed to have fun, okay? We like to party here. We like to have fun.”

 

Don’t take thinks so seriously.

 

[28:14]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but the thing is, I do take the KKK classically seriously. I know they still exist, but obviously in whatever respect, that they still exist, it’s obviously declined. They obviously don’t have the influence they once did. Back in, like the 1930s they had a membership of like 10 million men. You know, they were the invisible empire. They were in government. They were in judges, police chiefs and so on. Like, they dominated, like, Southern politics. And they objectively kept the streets safe for White Americans. Because not only did they execute justice from time to time, but there was the fear of the Klan. The Klan is about. So you best be on your best behaviour if you don’t want to get lynched. You know what I mean? So that kept things in line. And America was far better for it, in my opinion.

 

And that’s not saying that I co-signed every single thing they ever did. Obviously, there’s a complicated history. There was different phases of the Klan. I don’t want to go into all of that, but just from the perspective of White men come coming together in the millions and organising on the basis of their race. If only we had that today! If only White Americans still had that today, that’d be so much better off. And if only we could have that again in White countries. We Sorely need it with the all the horrible crimes that are committed against our people and the total lack of justice that we are receiving.

 

So that meaning of the Klan is the meaning that I think Jacob is venerating. Not any of these particulars about the Klan didn’t like Catholics, and Catholics are White or so that’s not good. Or the Klan was too soft on jews at times, which it was in some phases. But then there was anti-semitic elements of the Klan as well. And it’s really complicated. Anyway, we don’t need to go into that.

 

The point is Halloween. Halloween is seen as like an American thing in Australia. So then what funnier way to celebrate it than to do the Klan blackface costumes? Because that’s as American as Apple pie. And I saw someone commenting on the video, like:

 

“You deracinated Australians you know why are you doing this American holiday?”

 

It’s like, come on, let us have fun. You know, Halloween technically goes back to its actually from, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s Irish. I think it’s Irish.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

And there’s also veneration of it in Britain in some form. Obviously the form that it has taken today is adapted and Americanised. But that’s, I mean, Americans are still our cousins. We can have elements of American culture be celebrated here. There’s nothing wrong with that. And it falls on the time of the year, which is supposed to be the time under which whether if you’re a kind of Celtic pagan, it’s a time to reflect upon your ancestors. If you’re a Catholic, it’s like All Saints Day, you know, so, it’s a time the spring equinox in the Northern hemisphere is a time where the kind of reflect upon our ancestors and venerate our ancestors. And in some way the Ku Klux Klan are our like racist ancestors.

 

Blair Cottrell: If they did have that much influence, it’d be interesting to learn about how they lost all that influence. That’d be a, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s true. I mean, I would like to read more and if anyone has any good book recommendations on that subject in particular, let me know. But I presume it must have been the changing political climate post World War II that really must have destroyed racism globally.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that really did shake everything up around the world. But what are we, …

 

Thomas Sewell: So Halloween. Halloween, sorry, is. I don’t know if I’m pronouncing this correctly. That’s Samhain, which is an ancient, ancient festival. It’s like the last harvest or whatever. It’s like meant to be. That’s why there’s the pumpkins, because it’s the Autumn harvest. Yeah, it’s the equal, it’s the exact equal point between I think the equinox and yule.

 

Yeah, I have to get the calendar up again. But it’s a significant date. Like much long, long, long before America was even invented or discovered as a concept. So.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! Obviously one of the southern hemisphere, so everything’s flipped and, …

 

Thomas Sewell: We should be celebrating Oster if we’re going to be technical, like it’s technically Easter here in the Southern hemisphere.

 

Joel Davis: All the sluts going nightclubbing, dressed in like barely, like scantily clad, like Halloween outfits. It’s kind of a fertility festival vibe. So maybe, you know, it kind of makes sense in a weird way. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: The outfits were out of control for a couple days. Like it was a bit of a fertility festival here in the southern hemisphere. The outfits were much more provocative than usual.

 

Joel Davis: Of course I wasn’t looking, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Where though? What, just on the street? Where exactly?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, just in the street, in the city.

 

Like I was driving through like San Kilda with Joel and there was heaps of it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, right.

 

[33:30]

 

Joel Davis: But anyway, let’s get on to the next subject because I want to get your guys’s take on this.

 

So there was an election in Queensland last week and One Nation really underperformed expectations. They got, I think roughly just below 8% of the vote, which seems decent, but actually in 2017 they got almost 14% of the vote. And Queensland is the kind of heartland of One Nation. The heartland really of patriotic nationalist Right-wing politics in Australia in some ways in terms of the kinds of support that you can drum up in Queensland. It’s historic. Like over the last few decades, it’s the most Right leaning state. It has better racial demographics than New South Wales or Victoria, that’s for sure. That plays into it as well.

 

And so that’s really like a poor performance, particularly considering the fact that the current political climate the trends are all heading in the Right-wing. You know, the Liberal Party won the election up there pretty handsomely and obviously immigration has become, kind of the main issue in politics. It is a state election, so immigration isn’t as relevant.

 

But, you know, reports on the ground I was reading in The Noticer article on it, you know, seemed to suggest that there’s a lot of people that were trying to get involved in the campaign that were just:

 

“Hey, can I get a One Nation shirt so I can hand out some how to vote cards or something?”

 

And like they were just getting no reply, which is a total like totally disorganised mess.

 

And then immediately after the election, Pauline Hanson and James Ashby, a homosexual 2IC, who directed a lot of the party’s funding into his failed bid in the particular seat he was standing in.

 

Now, in Queensland, they don’t have two houses, they only have one house.

 

So there’s no Senate or Upper House equivalent, therefore there’s no proportional representation. You just have to try and win seats. He was, I think, the best performing One Nation candidate because he directed all of his funding into his seat, but he still didn’t win his seat.

 

So therefore they won those seats. It was a disappointing, you know, display. Also in some seats where they stood against Libertarians, like in the Gold Coast, I think the Libertarian candidate beat them, which just kind of shows that like they’re getting beaten by a party that has much less brand recognition and like legacy appeal. You know, back in the late 90s when One Nation first came on the scene, they ended up getting like 25% of the vote in their first ever Queensland election.

 

And like I said, when Pauline Hanson came back, they got almost 14% of the vote in Queensland.

 

So the party seems to be kind of losing momentum. And the direction of their campaign was really directed against the current Labor government rather than, or who’s now lost rather than attacking the Liberals, who really are the party that they’re competing for voters with. And that’s like the kind of whole modus operandi. What a populist Right-wing party is supposed to do is attack the conservatives. They attack the conservatives and that’s how they basically win votes by saying:

 

“Hey, like we’re the true Right-wing option!”

 

That’s how the Reform Party did their election in Britain recently. They attacked the conservatives hard and took a bunch of their voters. When Trump barged into the Republican Party, he attacked a lot of like the legacy conservative establishment took their votes. And in a lot of European countries where the populist, anti-immigration party is now doing better than the conservative Party in a lot of these countries, like in Austria recently, we saw that. In Germany, they do that there as well, that’s the obvious campaign strategy.

 

So why did One nation barely attack the Liberals and focus all of its energy on campaigning against Labour? And then Hanson and Ashby came out, as I said, after the election, and celebrated defeating Labour because the way that it works with the preferential voting, the votes that went to them basically just got sent to the Liberal Party and help the Liberal Party get elected in a whole bunch of seats.

 

So effectively they functioned as a kind of a secondary kind of vote like gathering scheme for the Liberal Party, they basically, it’s like if James Ashby, who’s basically running the show behind the scenes, if he was a Liberal Party operative, I’m not saying I have evidence that he is, but he would behave exactly the same way that he does, where he doesn’t really run the party properly, like they actually want to win, but just goes and scoops up those votes of people that are disaffected with the Liberals and then cycles them back in through preferences into the Liberal Party.

 

Anyway, from my insider information, Pauline Hanson will quit politics at the end of her current Senate term, which will not be at the next national election, but the one after because Senate terms are double terms. So the One Nation Party, I think is condemned to dying like after they alienated Craig Kelly in New South Wales after losing Mark Latham. You know, they’re just showing an inability to work with any other like prominent politician. How much I like those guys in the country. So they don’t really have much dynamism. They don’t allow their members to really be involved in the party in any way, shape or form. There’s no branches, there’s no voting rights for members. A lot of their members couldn’t even like get a One Nation T-shirt and how to vote paraphernalia at this election.

 

I mean, that’s how much they alienate their members. They’re more afraid of members joining the party and actually trying to win and losing control of the party to like a young aspirational set of young nationalist activists that actually care about winning on the issues that matter. They barely talk about immigration, even though that’s the main selling point of One Nation is that they supposedly are the anti-immigration party. Supposedly, that’s their whole brand.

 

[39:26]

 

So I think they’re like they behave like controlled opposition. They seem to care more about Israel than about defending White Australian interests. Lately in their public messaging, they care more about attacking Labour than attacking Liberal, even though they’re not really going to get votes off Labour very much.

 

So I think the sooner this party dies the better so that they can create space for like a genuine nationalist party, which is something that we have the ambition of creating in the next few years. Hopefully to kind of take the space that they’re currently occupying and do it properly with actual nationalism in a way that will actually win votes for genuine nationalist ideas rather than the watered down joke.

 

Like I was talking to a friend of mine who lives, I think near Ipswich, which is just to the west of the kind of urban sprawl of Brisbane. And he said he went to the polls and he was going to vote for One Nation and then he pulled up his ballot and the One Nation candidate had some Muslim name or Indian name or something like that, and he was like:

 

“I’m not voting for this. I’m not voting for some brown guy!”

 

So he just wrote Hitler in. He just wrote a box Adolf Hitler and ticked it because he was just like, well, there’s no other good options. I’m not going to vote for Liberal, Labour or Greens. And this is an endemic problem. This happened in the New South Wales election. I remember last year where they put up a bunch of Indian candidates for One Nation.

 

The reason why we’re voting for One Nation is because we want to stop the fucking Indians coming in! [chuckling] That’s why you’re running Indian candidates. It’s a joke of a party. I hate it! And it deserves to be punished. I definitely will be advocating that no one vote for them at the next election. And they’re really ruining their branding. They should be trying to appeal to people like us and win us over.

 

Like when we did the recent activism. And I was reading the comments section on TikTok in particular, but also on Facebook of people responding to the media releases or the videos that went up about recent activism, particularly the Fuck Off We’re Full activism. There are a whole bunch of people in the comments saying, vote One Nation.

 

So a lot of people who like us, like One Nation because they perceive them as you know, nationalists. But they’re not. They’re a joke!

 

So what do you think about all of this, Blair? Because in my view, you know, Pauline Hanson, you know, is the kind of legacy figure associated with Australian nationalism in the public consciousness, doesn’t deserve to be. And she’s frankly, unintelligent, unsophisticated, uninspiring joke of an old lady really.

 

Blair Cottrell should be the successor, in my opinion, to Pauline Hanson. You know, I think one of the main reasons every wheeled her out of retirement was because you started getting momentum with your activism, and ZOG realised like:

 

“Oh, shit! We don’t want to let him, you know, lead a nationalist movement here. We’ve got to bring Pauline Hanson out to go and scoop up all of that anti-Islam sentiment and redirect it into ZOG [Zionist Occupied Government] machine.”

 

Thomas Sewell: We should ask the chat. We should ask the chat. Should Blair Cottrell run One Nation?

 

Joel Davis: [chuckling] I don’t think they’re going to let him run it! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Should we organise a coup on One Nation? Should we send Blair in, just see what happens? Because One Nation, Victoria would be easy to take over. We should just openly say:

 

“Look, we’re putting up Blair Cottrell!”

 

Blair Cottrell: But isn’t that Pauline Hanson’s One Nation. Her name’s in the name of the party.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Cottrell is one nation!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. [chuckling] The Beacon!

 

Thomas Sewell: The BCON. Because they call it PHON and that’s like Phony, like Pauline Hanson One Nation. But it should be the Beacon, the Beacon of Light, the Blair Cottrell One Nation, Beacon.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, man. Who knows? Maybe this will happen and maybe sooner. Sooner than we think. I don’t think we’d have to take it over. Or maybe it is best to occupy, or take over a party that is already established.

 

Thomas Sewell: Should we mobilise the patriots on a Blair Cottrell side quest? Yeah, Blair Cottrell Man Quest.

 

Blair Cottrell: [chuckling] Sure, man. You guys draw up the plans and I’m ready to go with whatever we come up with, … [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Geez, it’s all happening here. Geez. Let’s get Cooper Jennings [sp] back on board. Where is that guy? We need a guy to explain how to do this.

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s One Nation been doing, though? Like, when Pauline Hanson came along, everybody got excited! Because they thought, finally, here’s someone that’s really going to represent us. She’s one of us. Yeah, she’s one of us. What she’s saying resonates with us. She knows what we want. She knows what we need as a nation.

 

Fast forward to today. What’s she doing? It’s exactly why Hitler says in Mein Kampf that the reason he didn’t go into Parliament is because he saw that Parliament was a bucket of rotten Apples and that he was convinced that if he went in there, he would become rotten as well. I don’t think he can sort of survive in Parliament for very long without becoming just like every other creature in there. It’s disappointing!

 

But yeah, I think the results of that latest poll speak for themselves. Like, people, the working class Aussies obviously just aren’t interested in Pauline Hanson anymore. And rightfully. So I mean, she’ll pop up every now and then and say something to get everyone’s support or try to get everyone’s support, but it’s all just for scoring political points now. And she doesn’t seem to be all that serious about protecting Australia.

 

[45:04]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think Pauline Hanson should be out there every day going hard on immigration. Like if you look at we’ve gone through for polling on the show, immigration, the current immigration policy of the government is wildly unpopular. It’s, you know, super majority of Australians want drastic cuts to immigration. Close to a majority of Australians want like a total, like moratorium on immigration. And that’s true for Right-wing voters in particular, who a lot of them are probably voting for the Liberals just to try and get Labour out because they hate the current Labor government so much that the situation is ripe for a nationalist, even a quasi or fake nationalist party to go and take those votes.

 

Like we’ve seen in, as I said, in European democracies, we’re seeing that trend in almost every White country, even in Britain, with the Reform Party almost beating the conservatives at the last election and polling above the conservatives now in many polls. I haven’t checked the most recent polls, but they’re neck and neck, basically. That should be the situation here as well. If they had even somewhat competent leadership that had a will to win, but they don’t!

 

And I’d love to install Blair as the leader of one nation. And if One Nation gave its members any rights whatsoever, we could probably do that, but we can’t because Pauline Hanson has written to the party constitution, it’s a total dictatorship. There’s absolutely no entryism that’s possible. They’re more concerned with preventing people like us, or even people that are more moderate than us, who are still patriotic and well intentioned and want to win, from using that party as a vehicle to actually do anything good for White Australia.

 

And so that therefore, in my opinion, the party just needs to die, be punished. And we’re gonna have to build our own to replace it. Which it will be replaced because I think it won’t survive her retiring from politics. She’s getting old. She’s done! And she was in the news obviously this week as well because the federal court ruled that she had to delete her tweet telling was her name Faruqi, that Pakistani senator, to piss off back to Pakistan.

 

And obviously that was kind of based or whatever of her to say that. And we support her right to free speech. And if only she spoke like that more, like if she was doing that kind of thing every day, standing up for White Australians and telling foreigners to go back where they came from, she probably would be getting 20% rather than 8%, you know, 20, 25% of the vote.

 

But it’s few and far between. And you know, that court ruling was lame. But she’s not going to get like a big fine or go to jail, I think they just demanded she take the tweet down. So it’s a little bit of like political theatre, but nothing too extreme.

 

It was interesting though that they used a similar argument to Hersant. His case with the Roman salute basically saying that the “feelings” of minorities are more important to protect their now right to political communication, which is implied by apparently by the Constitution according to the High Court. So it’d be interesting to see if she appeals that to the High Court and if that could be overturned. Hopefully it is. Obviously we support that being overturned because our right to political communication is so vital. It’s interesting that like Hersant and Hanson seem to be like the two, the kind of “HH” double action there that are fighting for that right in the court system right now.

 

But yeah, I think in my opinion if I’m going to vote at the next election, I’m more likely to vote for the Libertarian Party than the One Nation Party.

 

And that’s another thing I want to talk to you guys about. I posted today an interview of John Ruddick from the Libertarian Party in New South Wales. He was interviewed by John Lawson, who is a nationalist. He’s more of a conservative than us. He’s not like us, but he is a nationalist in his political views.

 

And so that was interesting that he would do that interview. And the interview was literally about:

 

“Okay, so what are you willing to offer nationalists to bring them on the team for voting for you?”

 

And Ruddick was very open about trying to solicit support from nationalists, saying:

 

“Well, hey, like you not be libertarians, but you can get on the so-called freedom bus (as he described it) and you can get off when we’ve done enough, like this is what we want to do. We want to shut down immigration for five years. We want to get rid of refugees, no more refugees whatsoever!”

 

He had like some other plan which I didn’t particularly like about what to do after five years, but he said we’ll shut it down for five years, which obviously sounds good. It was sad that Lawson didn’t question him on this because he said in New South Wales Parliament that he wants to repeal the Racial Discrimination Act*.

 

[* The New South Wales Anti–Discrimination Act 1977 is an Act of the NSW Parliament, relating to discrimination in employment, the public education system, delivery of goods and services, and other services such as banking, health care, accommodation and night clubs. The Act prohibits unlawful racial, sexual and other types of discrimination in certain circumstances and promotes equality of opportunity for all people. Wikipedia]

 

Obviously they’re very strong on free speech. I saw him arguing in the New South Wales Parliament a week or two ago against the Bill to ban the Roman salute and the swastika and so on. And basically defending us, more or less, not really in name, but more or less defending us.

 

[50:09]

 

And a lot of people from the Libertarian Party came out and defended Hersant directly over the Roman salute thing on free speech grounds.

 

So that’s good. I didn’t hear anyone from One Nation do that. And some of their other policies I like as well. Like they I support their policies on gun rights, they’re pretty good on gun rights. I support their policies on, just defunding the bureaucracy, like the WOKE bureaucracy, just taking money away from all of these like Left-wing bureaucrats that use it to promote multiculturalism and LGBTQ plus bullshit and whatever.

 

So there’s a lot of good policies there. I’m obviously not a libertarian. We’re not libertarians, so we disagree on many issues, but we don’t really have a proper nationalist option. Next election, maybe the election after, we will be able to finally field our own candidates.

 

But in the meantime, I said on Telegram, if they’re going to give me a five year immigration moratorium and they’re going to come out and say they want to cancel student visas and so on, and they want to go hard on immigration restriction, I will strongly consider endorsing them at the next election because you might as well vote for someone if you have to vote anyway. And just like I was talking about my friend, you know, writing in Hitler, that’s based or whatever, I’ve done that before myself.

 

But obviously that doesn’t really do anything if One nation want to run a bunch of Indian candidates and barely talk about immigration and just cycle preferences into the Liberal Party without really offering much of a fight maybe I’ll go elsewhere to help kill One Nation off and take their votes away and give them to someone else that’s actually trying to solicit me in some way, which is, I think what Libertarian Party is trying to do. They’re trying to solicit nationalists to say:

 

“Hey, like we want your support even if we don’t necessarily agree on everything.”

 

So I don’t know. What do you guys think about that?

 

Thomas Sewell: Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s the essence of the question?

 

Joel Davis: Do you think we should bother weighing in on endorsing anyone in the next election? Because, I mean, we have some influence, our endorsement probably matters in a certain sense, a lot of votes, which would shift based upon our opinion. Maybe we should use that to try and pressure if a party wants to solicit it, maybe we should try and say:

 

“Hey, well win my vote, then give me something!”

 

Do you agree with what I’m saying about fuck One Nation? Because in my opinion we should try to destroy them, get them out of the way. So that we can make space for us to kind of enter politics in the coming years.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I largely agree with that. I can’t really answer the other question though. I just can’t because I don’t know enough about how official politics works. I don’t know who do we endorse and for what reason? The Libertarians, I suppose?

 

Joel Davis: On the proviso they gave us a better immigration policy than the alternatives.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I suppose.

 

But you know, would anybody be willing to sort of like. I suppose they don’t need to accept our endorsement. They get endorsed regardless if they want to accept it or not. I don’t know. I’d have to give it some thought. I’m not really sure. What do you reckon, Tom Sewell? [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I’ve got so much on my plate, I’m not really thinking about it. But Joel’s on the money. Like Joel’s focused on it for sure and what’s the guy from the National Observer? He seems to be interested in the theory as well.

 

Joel Davis: John Lawson.

 

Thomas Sewell: John Lawson, yeah.

 

So it’s an interesting side quest. I still firmly believe we need to establish our own strength. I don’t think there’s any point of us going into coalitions at this stage and they wouldn’t want to, they would go into a coalition with more. Yeah, it wouldn’t work out that way. The Libertarians, I’ve met a lot of them, I’ve been to their meetings before when I was younger and I wasn’t a libertarian but I’d say I was like leaning in sympathy to them in the past. But yeah, it would be very hard for them.

 

There’s a natural pipeline of course, when you employ the liberty of the individual, then if that’s the micro of a greater macro being the liberty of the nation, you can see that’s a consistent ideological standpoint. The problem is that most libertarians don’t think like that, they don’t think about ideological consistency. Their ideology is actually just selfishness.

 

So libertarians are a serious problem in my opinion because their ideology is selfishness! Libertarianism is just a vehicle, or a vessel for them to achieve their selfishness.

 

But anyone that is more rounded and family oriented and maybe even potentially conservative or nationalist or patriotic minded individual within the Libertarian Party, on a long enough timeline, they’re going to join forces with us anyway. But let a thousand flowers blossom!

 

[55:34]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’m not saying we all sign up and like become card carrying libertarians. But we thought about trying to get things together to field candidates at the next election, then assessed it and thought, that’s we wouldn’t be able to do it properly. We could probably do it, but it wouldn’t be done professionally enough to the point that it would be truly competitive and have a strong chance of getting someone elected.

 

And so we made the call that it didn’t make sense to do it until we build up that strength, which we want to do over the coming years so we can be in a position to do something like that properly. But until we get to that point, it’s well, I wouldn’t mind playing like trying to play games a little bit and insinuate ourselves into the conversation in some way. Like we did that during the referendum [The Voice] pretty effectively where we managed to insinuate ourselves into the conversation. And I like insinuating myself into political conversations in general. I think that it’s just good for, to kind of get eyes on us and to get relevance and we actually have a bit of weight that we can throw around. So why not throw it around?

 

But yeah, it is not like the main issue.

 

Thomas Sewell: The biggest priority for anyone that wants to vote is to not vote Liberal and Labour. Even though we’ve got the gay preferential voting the most important donkey vote, if you’re going to donkey vote, if you’re going to go vote, is just don’t vote Liberal or Labour. Vote anyone but them! Like that’s the Mono-party or whatever you want to call it, the Uni-party. We just need all the weight on the extremes. You know, you’re literally better off voting for the Greens than you are for the Liberal-Labor Party because at least the Greens are going to de-legitimize the Left. They’re going to exacerbate and hide in the contradictions. They’re going to accelerate the situation.

 

So we just need to take all the power away from the centre. If you’re lazy and not active and don’t want to get involved and don’t want to support and all you’re going to do is vote, then that’s how you do it. It’s not going to achieve much, but it’s definitely better than nothing.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I agree with that.

 

But also you should stand back and stand by for, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Patriots.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Joining the party that we create, because frankly no one else I don’t think in Australia has got the will or the ability to create it. So it falls probably on us to do it. Otherwise it just won’t get done.

 

Thomas Sewell: If I’m gonna vote in a popularity contest, the only person I’m going to vote for is Blair Cottrell. No one else is more popular than Blair Cottrell.

 

Joel Davis: So no, I agree. I think if we can build something as a vehicle to put Blair to the people. I think the people flock to Blair.

 

Thomas Sewell: We don’t do elections. We don’t do elections in NSN. But if we had an election in NSN, who’s going to run the cross burning? Blair would win the vote. That’s how popular the man is! They’d be like, Blair’s gonna do the cross burning this time. I’ll be like, all right, fair enough. It is what it is.

 

Blair Cottrell: [chuckling] That’s, it’s nice to know.

 

Thomas Sewell: The only reason why we don’t do elections Blair. I’m scared.

 

So the government should be more scared. The government should be scared of you. Well, they are. [chuckling] That’s why they’ve been fucking with us for so long. But yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I don’t know what to say about it really. I feel that there’s pretty much, I can go in whatever direction I wish from here. And I’ve been biting my time as just staying in the network and keeping an eye on everything, waiting for the right opportunity to arise.

 

And yes, it’s funny the kind of staying power your name gets sometimes where you feel like you’re not really doing enough to contribute sometimes. But everyone still knows you and is still inviting you to everything and dragging you back in. So it’s pretty cool to have constant support from everyone in the community, even from overseas. Like even Mark Collett and the Patriotic Alternative guys. Yeah, I don’t know, it’s just really cool to still be in the game even after all these years!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I just believe you can win elections.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I could, yeah. It seems that way. Well I look, I can look the part. I can wear the suit and I can give the speeches and I can be, …

 

Thomas Sewell: You can beat them at their game. Even if we don’t really agree with their game, we can still come for their job. You know, we need to put Leftists on warning:

 

“We’re coming for your jobs!”

 

They mock us and say:

 

“Oh, they took our jobs!”

 

You know, like when they complaining about our action in Corowa, and they’re mocking us for sticking up for Aussies that are losing their jobs to migrant workers.

 

But what we should be focusing on is making the establishment afraid that we’re going to come for their jobs. Like we’re going to put the media out of business. When we have our media all set up one way or the other, whether achieving state power or not. We’re coming for their jobs. They won’t have a job. None of these journalists are going to have a job in the future.

 

So, yeah, none of these politicians, none of them are going to have jobs in the future. We’re coming for their jobs! At a minimum, that’s what’s going to happen. We’re coming for their jobs!

 

[1:01:09]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m still feeling a bit sick, boys. Like, I haven’t really got my voice in that, I’m not 100% recovered.

 

Is there anything else that you want to run by me, Joel, or am I okay to go to bed? Because I’m feeling like shit! Sorry, by the way, guys, for the bad performance tonight. I was still not 100% recovered. I was really sick all weekend, like, bed bound.

 

Joel Davis: It’s all right.

 

We’ll be back on Thursday and can have, like a more conventional show, but obviously we missed the show last Thursday, so I wanted to do something. And I think because the American election is tomorrow and everything there could be that could end up being kind of like the interesting thing to talk about on Thursday or whatever.

 

So I just wanted to have a show where we could cover some of the things that have happened over the past week, particularly hearing about your trip to England and things like that.

 

But I’m curious, what did you do for Diwali? Because I know that’s. Apparently this is a big holiday in Australia now. Did you take any dumps on the side of the road or did you, like, rape any women or something? What’d you do? Yeah, did you go worship a cow? I don’t know what it is that they do exactly. But I’m not much of a Diwali enthusiast.

 

Blair Cottrell: Nah, I sold some Slurpees. [chuckling] I’m assuming that’s an Indian holiday that they want to have here now. Yeah. I don’t know.

 

Thomas Sewell: Politicians couldn’t kiss Indian arse harder at the moment. It’s disgusting! They’re all putting dots on their heads and wearing the stupid hats.

 

Joel Davis: It’s a picture of Albanese in the turban.

 

Thomas Sewell: I saw a video, was brilliant! It was an Indian saying to the Prime Minister:

 

“Do you feel like you’re in India right now?”

 

And he replies:

 

“Yeah, yeah!”

 

And they’re in like an Indian temple in Sydney. And it’s just disgusting!

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, obviously it’s in the corporate interests for Indians to be the new economic migrants to Australia because that tends to be what gets mainstream politics flowing in the same direction is corporate sponsorship and pressure.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

But also I saw you weigh in. I know you saw this story because I saw your respect responding to one of those like, Right-wing Zionist accounts on Twitter today, Blair. I’ll pull it up from The Noticer. This guy here, he walked around Bondi with a shirt saying “Fuck Israel Fuck Zionism”.

 

[Aussie charged with ‘offensive behaviour’ for wearing ‘fuck Israel’ T-shirt at Bondi Beach]

 

And obviously Bondi is most jewish suburb in Sydney. Beautiful beach.

 

But yeah, apparently he was charged with offensive behaviour for wearing this shirt, which, I think it’s pretty ridiculous! I mean, I’ve seen much worse than that it’s not even, like “Fuck Israel” is like the opinion of a very large subset of the population. He kind of has a Chad aura, I must say. He’s got like a Chad Boomer aura in the picture.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, he has the right to believe that he has the right to wear that T-shirt, I think, like, he doesn’t have to support Israel just because he’s walking through Bondi.

 

So I think the police probably charged him as a result of pressure, you know, heckling from accounts like this one on the screen. Now it’s just the cops doing the dirty work for laggers and sooks. Offensive behaviour is probably a summary offence. It’s probably not a big charge and he’s within his rights to challenge it. So it’s definitely not a victory for the sorcs. I’ve got no problem with the T-shirt. Like, the T-shirt could also say Fuck Hamas, or Fuck Palestine, whatever. If that’s what you think you’re allowed to think that. The guy can have whatever opinion he wants.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I’d wear T-shirt. It’s a cool shirt. Maybe I’ll try wear it. Maybe we should wear it in solidarity with this fine, supreme gentleman. He has a little bit of a mullet going as well. Little bit of a mullet.

 

So I appreciate it, but I saw that this is the Australian jewish Association Twitter account, which I saw you respond to. I responded to them as well. And just I think yesterday they were defending Pauline Hanson saying her free speech rights were violated:

 

“The legal system is failing because she was ordered to take down the tweet saying, ‘piss off back to Pakistan’.”

 

Obviously, they’re correct about this, but then some guy walking around in a T-shirt that says Fuck Israel, they’re kvetching like crazy wanting him arrested. So it just shows obviously we know jews are hypocrites, but it just puts it on full display! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, the guy obviously wore the T-shirt because he wanted to invite a response and he got a response. So yeah. But at the same time, he should be able to wear whatever he wants, as long as it’s not threatening anyone. And it wasn’t. So I don’t see what the problem is like I said, I think he’s within his rights to challenge that charge. Any sensible magistrate would probably overturn that, throw it out. But we don’t have a lot of sensible magistrate magistrates left at state level. But so there’s still probably a few, I hope.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

[1:06:24]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Sorry. What I was saying was we didn’t really. You touched on a little bit, but this Pauline Hanson tweet telling., … We kind of dumped on Pauline Hanson, rightfully so she’s obviously burnt out or infiltrated, or a combination of the two. But how do we even pronounce the name of that Senator that she told to go back to Pakistan? Has anyone attempted it?

 

Joel Davis: I said Faruki. That sounds like a bit of an Aussie, …

 

Thomas Sewell: The name, like Marine or something, like a Pokemon.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, she sounds like a Pokemon. Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Marine Faruki. I didn’t see that name on the War Memorial.

 

Joel Davis: No, [chuckling] no, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, I just muted that Superchat that came up. We normally don’t mute Superchats. I know that we normally read out every single one, but I figured let’s try and go like two weeks without having any sort of internal infighting controversy. Like, we do touch on it a lot, like little internal, the makeup question and all this other stuff.

 

But we’ve just got so much on at the moment. We’re so busy. I don’t really have time for kind of Joshing around on these kind of questions.

 

And there was another guy that just kept asking. He asked like 50 times what our opinions on Georgians were. And I just muted him forever. I’m pretty sure. I’ve just kind of been pretty focused on the chat today, just getting rid of the troublemakers. They really just disrupt the discourse, even if they’re not actually like an Antifa or just like a troll. If they are, like, of good faith, but they just socially inept, maybe they can come back in a year when they’ve got a brain. That’s kind of how I feel about some people in the chat. Because it is like a discourse. The chat does. It is part of the experience for anyone that’s live.

 

And if you imagine, like, it’s like a TV show and there’s a live audience, you would get hecklers and you would get like a Superchat’s like someone getting the mic, you know, given to them like it’s Jerry Springer. I think it’s an important part of the dynamic. That’s why I’m quite policey with the chat, especially today.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, there you go, guys. You’ve been, … If you’re in the chat behave yourselves.

 

Thomas Sewell: Like a lot of good quality people in the chat, and having a live audience is really important.

 

And then you’ve got these troublemakers that just try to turn, like, maybe we don’t party enough, maybe we don’t Josh around enough. But I’d like to think that we have a good balance of taking things seriously when they need to be serious.

 

But then you got people in the chat like:

 

“What about the Georgians? Talk more about the Georgians!”

 

It’s like, shut up! Be quiet. Like, yeah, very frustrating.

 

Joel Davis: But, Tom, like, what tax policy will we have in the ethno-state?

 

Thomas Sewell: You know, it’s honestly a more important question. Like, I’m not going to answer it, but that, like, I can kind of tolerate that once a month, if someone wants to hear, like:

 

“What’s the substance of what you guys are about?”

 

You know, the pressing issues. [chuckling]

 

But, yeah, there are just troublemakers we have to be aware of, …

 

Blair Cottrell: All right, boys, well, I’m done. I’m going to go to bed and rest up. Apologies for the early checkout, guys, but, yeah, it’s been a bit of a mission getting my health back on track since I landed.

 

So, yeah, see you guys soon!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I’m gonna head off as well. I’m very tired. We had a very big, very big weekend.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. That march through the shrub or the scrub whatever you call it up in the Grampians was brutal because it wasn’t a path. Like we’re just kind of like crashing through trees and stuff for hours. Gave me a newfound respect for the early explorers, actually. Who the pioneer explorers, not only of this great continent, but also in North America. Those guys must have been fit. You know, like they doing that day in, day out along, across long distances is quite the feat.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, well, if people aren’t aware. You didn’t cover at the start of the show, did you?

 

Joel Davis: No.

 

Thomas Sewell: We had a big camping trip, the Org, the southern states. We had Victorian guys and South Australian guys meet up with the Grampians. All the photos are coming out, they’re being released on Telegram and Twitter as we speak. And there’s more production value that will be coming out. There was no incidences to be concerned about. No infiltrators or Leftists or journalists tried to attack us. We just had a good time larping around in the bush and going to see some beautiful sights and beautiful waterfalls. And we did a massive six or seven hour hike to the Klan Cave where we had our first ever national meet, which really put us on the map for a lot of people.

 

[The Byaduk Caves – The Grampians]

 

Not many people in Australia had heard of us until we were on the project on Channel 10 in 2021. And that was actually just before I went to jail. And we had our first national meet there. I think it was 37 guys and we ascended the Klan Cave. I think only about 30 of us made it up there. And we sang a clan song and you know, Jacob wanted to be as provocative as possible to just agitate them, agitate the media into reacting and they did. And we just had a great time. That was after, in the 2021 version of Grampians.

 

We did a three day hike around the Grampians as well beforehand. So we were pretty fatigued by the time we got to the Klan Cave. But this year we didn’t do. Because it wasn’t like a national meet, it was just like a little quarterly meet. We met up with the South Australians and we just, it wasn’t like a big four day thing, it was just like a one day, one and a half day thing.

 

[1:12:19]

 

But we had a great time. And there was drunken boxing, one of the nights. A lot of the older guys stayed up and we got, we got a little smashed. We do party sometimes. And in the morning I woke up and there was a, just a normie, like a, just a random guy came over to me and was like:

 

“Hey, do you guys all know each other?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Yeah, we’re the national ping pong team!”

 

I was [chuckling] still really. And I was just like, I think I’d had an hour and a half sleep. And he was like:

 

“Yeah, wow! Last night was. Yeah, it was full on!”

 

And I was like:

 

“Man, I didn’t even know you were there.”

 

And I said:

 

“Was your family there as well?”

 

He goes:

 

“No, no, it’s just the wife. But yeah, she was a bit upset. But I just said to her, look, it’s just a lot of guys and it looks like they’re having a lot of fun! And we just decided to put the earplugs in at 3:30 in the morning and try and tune out.”

 

But we honestly had no idea. We thought we had the place to ourselves. So we were a bit loose. We burned some crosses. We did some chants. It probably was pretty full on. And before the guy walked off, he said:

 

“Look, honestly, the best part is we’re gonna have such a story to tell our friends when we get home from camping this weekend. Like, no one’s gonna believe what we witnessed!”

 

And [chuckling] I just, I’m like:

 

“That’s an interesting response. Well have a good day. Like, going to start packing up.”

 

So it was, honestly, it was great! It was a great weekend. I’m still recovering.

 

So how did you feel about a Joel?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, obviously doing the cross burnings and the Ku Klux Klan chants and so on was a lot of fun. And Jacob Hersant changing lyrics to pop songs to make them about the Ku Klux Klan. He’s like obsessed with this for some reason. [chuckling] It is quite funny singing those with the boys, particularly after a few drinks was quite a fun experience.

 

And like I said, I did enjoy the hike through the scrub and climbing up, because we, you know, it involved a lot of rock, a bit of like rock climbing, to be fair, to get up a few of these places. And I love climbing. So that was a little bit of climbing, but it was fun. We got some great views on the peaks, you know, beautiful views.

 

And also the stars at night were wonderful as well. Obviously out in the middle of nowhere. I always appreciate that. And sitting around the campfire with the boys drinking and talking and yeah, the drunk boxing was quite funny. Trying to adjudicate that. Some of the boys had so much to drink that they didn’t really care, that they kept losing because they just wanted to keep going more and more rounds.

 

Thomas Sewell: It was like 25 continuous rounds of drunk boxing. And Joel was like:

 

“I think we were just wrapping up.”

 

And Joel just was like:

 

“Is that the sun coming up?”

 

And I was like:

 

“Oh, God, it is. All right. Hell Hitler. Good night.”

 

And they just had the comfiest one and a half hours sleep in the swag. It was fucking awesome!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the swag on the first night didn’t go so great for me because I forgot to bring a sleeping bag. So it was pretty cold, to be fair. But the second night one of the boys Chuck a sleeping bag on. That enabled me to use my jacket as like a makeshift pillow. That was a much better night’s sleep, probably also due to the excessive alcohol consumption!

 

Thomas Sewell: And it was warm. That night was warm. Like, I didn’t even sleep in my sleeping bag. I was just on top of it. It was really warm.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, big camping trip with the boys. Yeah. Cathartic experience. Kind of necessary. You know, you got to exercise your White privilege of living in civilisation sometimes and like, return to primitive conditions to get back in touch with the blood memory.

 

So, yeah, it was a fun weekend.

 

Thomas Sewell: I won’t dox him. But it was funny what one of our colleagues said when we visited him after we got back, who didn’t come to the camping. And he said:

 

“He didn’t go because going camping reminds him of being homeless.”

 

And like, he doesn’t like the feeling of it.

 

And I think my reply was:

 

“I go camping because I think it’s important for us to remind ourselves of what that feels like.”

 

You know, I enjoy that feeling of, just going like, just straight returning to nature, even though you’re kind of glamping because we’ve got all these modern. You know, it’s not like full Ned Kelly bushranger style where you’ve got like a horse rug and that’s about it. And a Billy. It’s pretty luxurious, like what we can do even just out of a backpack, let alone out of the boot of your car, let alone if you’re actually one of those camping guys and you’ve got like the full 4B set up with the fridge and everything, then it’s like full glamping style. You can be out there for weeks without any inconvenience.

 

[1:17:03]

 

 

But yeah, I like the I like the camping out the backpacks, you know, keeping it. Keeping it lightweight. I think It’s a good ritual and we should do it more often. I keep saying it every year, and over the years we’ve done a lot of it, but I always encourage the guys to come, especially the younger guys, because otherwise it just makes you soft, in my opinion. You got to go camping every once in a while and the feasting and getting a bit toasty, if you’re ever going to get toasty there’s kind of these, like these key periods of the year. You know, you’ve got these sacred routines I think, festivals, and that’s definitely one of them. That weekend, the quarterly, it lined up perfectly with I mean, it’s a long weekend here in Victoria for the Melbourne Cup, which is also the same weekend, basically, as Samheim [sp], same weekend as Halloween. So it all works out really well, in my opinion. I think it’s more than just a coincidence that these things work out. Likewise, I think Anzac Day works out pretty perfectly as well. Is it with Oster?

 

Anyway, that works out. Australia has created a calendar of public holidays that are perfectly spaced between the solstices and the equinoxes. So I appreciate it. I think it’s a good time to go out and have fun with nature in the struggle.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I agree. No phone reception for two days kind of sucked, though. I couldn’t fire off so many tweets.

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, it was so good! [chuckling] What are you talking about? It was great! I forgot about Twitter.

 

Joel Davis: I had no dopamine. Had no dopamine.

 

Thomas Sewell: Some of the young guys were complaining about that and I just laughed at them.

 

Joel Davis: We had to drive, … I got there a night before you, so I got there and I saw Hersant. I said:

 

“Oh, sorry your Twitter got banned. That sucks, dude!”

 

He’s like:

 

“My Twitter got banned? What the fuck!”

 

We had to drive out to find, like, one bar of reception in 12 o’clock at night in the in someone’s ute in the bush to try and get him to fire off, you know, an appeal to the ban or whatever. But, yeah, it’s probably good to take a break from the dopamine hits.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s great to fast. Like, there’s different kinds of fasting. There’s food fasting, there’s different types of religious fasting.

 

You know, I think social media fasting is really important and just screen fasting. Like a lot of the young guys they spend so much time on their phones, they do need to spend more time just thinking. Thinking being able to be alone in your own company. Thinking! They would get destroyed in solitary confinement. Could you imagine like a week? Some of these guys are weak. No phone, no TV, no computer, nothing. Oh, it’d be so good for their brain. Their brain would start rewiring. Their develop personality. Just be incredible!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, sure, why not?

 

But yeah, I was going to talk about the American election, which is tomorrow. I thought that would be interesting.

 

Thomas Sewell: I can’t, I don’t.

 

Joel Davis: You don’t have to.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I’m too tired. I’ll leave you to do it.

 

But I was invited by, I think the Full House guys but I’m not sure how the timing will work. Is it like going to be like 10pm for us? It’ll start late for us, won’t it?

 

Joel Davis: Well, usually the results come in like the result, … Because it’s the 5th of November in America, but obviously the results don’t really see coming in until the night time in America, which by then it’s like the afternoon, Wednesday afternoon really that results start to come in. So it’d be like Wednesday. It’ll be like a Wednesday thing. So then we’re doing a show on Thursday so we’ll probably know who won. Unless it’s really close, which it could be because the polling has it very close. It could drag out like last time.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, the Americans have invited all three of us. Me, like, I’m sure Blair’s not interested, but myself, you and Jacob, if you’re interested. I think you’re more interested than me in covering the American election.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think it’s interesting for sure. I think it’s interesting.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Well, yeah, I’ll forward you the message if you want to do it with them.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, sure.

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ll pop in, but it’d be like a long stream. I don’t know what they did last election cycle, but I think it was like a pretty long stream. And I think there’s a bunch of different Americans. But I know the Full House guys were really keen to have us on.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I mean, yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: We can be like Australian celebrity guests. It’d be funny.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah.

 

Joel Davis: No, I’m down to do a pop in. Why not? Particularly if it goes. It could, it could be interesting. It could be like last time where it’s contested and, …

 

Thomas Sewell: It has been interesting every time. Yeah, I just don’t have the energy to cover tonight. But in the moment, I think I will have the energy. It’ll be exciting. Because it’s political. The whole thing’s political theatre, like Trump winning in 2016. I still remember that night. I remember Blair come to the pub. Fuck that was a night! That was a great night!

 

And then the 2021. Absolutely devastated! Absolutely devastated! I won’t even go into detail how devastated I was financially. [chuckling] But, yeah, still in the green. I’m still in the clear. But, yeah, that sucked! [chuckling] Yeah.

 

All right, I’m gonna head off. I’ll see the audience and yourself tomorrow and, … Well, not tomorrow.

 

Joel Davis: You’ll see the audience tomorrow.

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, if the audience is watching the American stream. Yeah. No, that’ll be Wednesday, won’t it? Wednesday morning.

 

Now, I’ll be at work, so I’ll be able to do it. Unless they’re doing, like, an early one Tuesday night. I don’t know. We’ll see how we go.

 

[1:22:57]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, I guess we’ll post it on social media if we go on anything, so everyone knows what we’re on.

 

And I think we should still do a show ourselves Thursday night, as usual, in the normal time slot.

 

But, yeah, who knows if there might be some other Australian story that’s interesting in Australian politics. I doubt it. Obviously, there’s never anything interesting happening in Australian politics except us! But, yeah, you can sign up if you want. I’m gonna talk about it a little bit with the people at home to give them some content to round out the second hour.

 

But you can go to sleep if you like.

 

Thomas Sewell: Someone’s asked me, got a if I’ve got a tip for Melbourne Cup. I don’t. And then his second message was Buckaroo. I mean, that’s a good brand of a good tool belt. So maybe that’s the ticket. Maybe that’s the ticket.

 

But, yeah, peace out.

 

Joel Davis: Comrade also said:

 

“I can’t spend, 24 hours without Tom tweeting a classic like ‘Shut Up Brown!’”

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, that’s pretty relevant. I logged into Twitter today, and the first thing that popped up, my feed. I can’t even remember what it was. I’ll check it now. But it was just these browns are just out of control. It doesn’t even matter. I tweeted that many times a day.

 

Joel Davis: We didn’t really talk much about, actually, the “Yellow Grub” thing. I don’t know if is your full speech, … Has it even been uploaded?

 

Thomas Sewell: No, we didn’t upload it because we’re waiting for the second camera.

 

So I just gotta speak to Jacob and get the second camera angle, because I didn’t like the first camera angle. I think the second camera angle is better. So we’ll wait for that. I think the first half of the speech is pretty good, and I think that’s what’s really going to be propagandized through the Internet.

 

So I’m not too stressed about the second half. The second half I just Fed post, I think, and, yeah, just a bit more passion, but I started to lose my voice at the end. And that’s because I didn’t have any milk beforehand. So that’s just another reminder. Get on the milk before the speech.

 

Joel Davis: You want to take milk to rallies. I mean, that’s the second rally in a row where lack of milk in the backpack is, has made us [word unclear]

 

Thomas Sewell: Absolutely!

 

All right, well, hail Hitler. See you guys later!

 

[1:25:11]

 

Joel Davis: See you, man.

 

Yeah, so anyway, like I said I’ll give you guys some content. I’ll talk about the American election to round out your second hour, because everyone’s tuned in and they want some entertainment.

 

So anyway, I’ll pull up this map thing of the Electoral College. Because a lot of people don’t understand how American elections work. You know, it goes off. You know, all the States have a certain amount of Electoral college points, as you can see here on this map. Like California has 54 points, Texas has 40 points, but New Mexico only has like five points, as you can see, and so on.

 

So the amount of points you got to get to 270, basically. 270 points plus wins you the election.

 

So that’s what’s decisive. And really there’s seven swing states. All the other states, we basically know who’s going to win! And the swing states are. Yeah, I’ll just change the colours here for your viewing benefit. Here we go. I’ll make them all grey. These are the seven swing states, all the grey states.

 

So you can see here with the States that we pretty much know who’s going to win! The scores are 226 to 219. And those swing states are really going to be decisive.

 

Now, in my opinion, Arizona looks good for Trump. I think Trump wins Arizona, I think Trump wins Georgia. And so that puts him up to 246. He needs 270. That means he’s going to need to get an extra, what, like 24 points from somewhere. And then, so it depends how does that combine?

 

Basically these four states here, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and North Carolina. He needs two of these four. He might get Nevada, he might not. But it only has six points. It isn’t as relevant. He really needs two of these four to win!

 

So that’s really what it’s worth watching for tomorrow. You know, if he wins Arizona and Georgia. If he wins Pennsylvania, then, you know, he just needs one more, for example. And the polling in all these states is very close. Like the polls have it within a percentage point either way. You know, different polls have a different way. So it’s genuinely up in the air. Who knows if it’ll be like rigged again. I don’t think it will be rigged again, but not like it was last time. There hasn’t been like the telegraphing of a rig. Like last time. It was kind of obvious that they were going to go for the rig. You could see it, but I don’t see the same telegraph. And the Republicans are a lot more prepared to defend against it as well.

 

[1:28:02]

 

So I don’t think it’s going to be possible to steal it in the way that it was stolen last time. I am predicting Trump will win. I predicted that Trump will win consistently for like a year. Even when it was looking kind of unlikely at various points. I’ve just always had that vibe.

 

Do I think Trump winning actually really matters that much though? No, honestly, I do think it matters to a significant extent because the reason why is because it would demonstrate that White American kind of political sovereignty and anti-immigration sentiment remains kind of politically strong. I think it’ll improve the morale of White Americans.

 

Whereas if he was to lose, I think the collective morale of White Americans it would be for their detriment, I would say. And it would make, I think Right-wing politics go on a less interesting trajectory. I could see the Republican Party just kind of moving back towards the centre in the next cycle and the whole enterprise being very just boring.

 

Whereas I think if Trump wins, I don’t think he will deliver on a lot of his promises. But I don’t agree with the view that if Trump wins, oh, that makes like war with Israel inevitable or something. I don’t, I’m sorry, war with Iran inevitable. I don’t see that as the case. I think invading Iran is logistically a nightmare. That’s why they haven’t done it yet. I mean Israel has wanted a regime change in Iran for decades. So why hasn’t it happened yet? It hasn’t happened yet because invading Iran is a nightmare because of the geography and they have a reasonably formidable military.

 

But not only that, the geography makes it because of how mountainous it is and so on. That’s why I believe that they took Iraq and Afghanistan and we’re going to take, try to take out Syria and then maybe try Iran. You know, during the neocon years. Obviously they failed to take Syria. The Russians got involved.

 

But yeah, I don’t see the political will for war with Iran really being there. I think if they tried to invade Iran the people would widely reject it. I think you’d see the biggest anti-war protests in human history. It’d be wildly unpopular and the war effort would be just kind of like a grind. It would be very difficult to succeed.

 

And I think eventually the Iranians would win. Not because they’re stronger than the Americans, but because the American war effort would collapse under their own kind of failing morale. The lack of national commitment to really like go 100% for broke. Because I mean, what does America benefit from regime change in Iran? It wouldn’t really benefit at all! It’d be purely a war for Israel. Be blatantly and obviously a war for Israel!

 

Now maybe that would be a good thing if you think about it from an accelerationist standpoint in and really turning everyone harshly against the jews and creating this intense wave of anti-semitism to sweep across American culture and you know, potentially that could backfire on the jews. But regardless, I just don’t think it will happen. I think at most if Iran got too bold in its actions against Israel, which frankly it hasn’t so far. I mean, Iran have said they’ve shouted and screamed during the whole action in Gaza that since October 7th last year that Israel have been carrying out like the war. But what have they really done? They’ve basically done nothing except lob a few missiles a month or two ago and they took out a few Air Force bases in Israel or something.

 

But I think that was just a way of placating their own population and trying to look tough to their own population, but ultimately it didn’t really matter. And lobbing a few missiles in Israel’s direction, yes, that pissed Israel off, or whatever.

 

But you know, it’s not really worth going to war over, quite frankly. I could see maybe the Israelis convincing the Americans to do some kind of strategic bombing campaign in Iran at maximum, at absolute maximum, if Iran, you know, went beyond a certain threshold in its actions against Israel. But honestly, I think Iran are too pussy to even do that. Though they are supporting Hamas and Hezbollah in whatever ways they can. But I think that’s the extent, the main extent of their involvement.

 

So, yeah, I just don’t see that situation going to the kind of catastrophic level that a lot of people do, just from my strategic evaluation of the facts on the ground. So this whole idea that Trump’s going to do a war with Iran, I just don’t think that’s true.

 

Now, the reason why people want to vote for him, from our persuasion, is because he’s promised to do mass deportations. I said on Twitter that I think it’s better for Trump to win and fail to carry out the mass deportations than for him to lose and then everyone to go on, like all conservatives, to just cry about election rigging for another few years. And the kind of idea of Trump not being broken by the reality, like, I’d rather him fail in office to carry out the mass deportations and everyone to get pissed off about it and demand a more radical nationalist politics to kind of, as a kind of response to the lesson of Trump’s failure or whatever. I’d rather that outcome. And maybe he does carry out the mass deportations to some extent. And that would also be politically incredible, because not just that it would improve the demographics of America to some degree, but it would show that mass deportations is a viable policy, would make it real as opposed to just an idea. And we want that idea to be made real in the consciousness of the masses, because that’s really the only solution to fixing our countries across the Western world is mass deportations.

 

[1:34:26]

 

But having said that, obviously they are only talking about mass deporting illegal immigrants. And really, it’s the legal immigrants that are the greater concern, because the legal immigrants that are coming into America on H1B visas or whatever, they’re coming from India, that are coming from Asia, a lot of them. Those are the ones that are going to go to Harvard, get PhDs or become elites or are going to take over companies or whatever, and compete with White Americans for positions of power, be elevated by theDEI [Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion/DIE: Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity] regime or the various DEI policies or whatever, into positions of power and then lord over White Americans as kind of clients of the jews and Left-wing elements that are trying to basically steal America from Whites.

 

Whereas I don’t support illegal immigration, obviously, but the illegals that are coming across, what are they doing? They’re mowing lawns, they’re working as roofers, they’re picking tomatoes. You know, they’re bringing crime and a lot of horrible things to America, but they’re not going to become a new elite. They’re not going to replace White American elites.

 

And so they’re less politically dangerous. They’re more directly dangerous in terms of crime rate or whatever, but less politically dangerous.

 

And I think that White nationalists in America or just pro-White people in America, generally speaking, need to be more focused upon attacking legal immigration. And we’ve heard comments from Trump and also from Elon Musk, who’s his probably most high profile backer in this election cycle. They actually support expanding legal immigration!

 

So that’s obviously a horrifying prospect. And that makes the idea of Trump winning kind of seem, it gives a sour taste, I think. It makes it, you know, markedly less exciting.

 

Also, Trump is the bookies favourite. So there’s not a lot of money to be made betting on Trump winning this time, like you could back in 2016. So I don’t think many people have really bothered putting money down. So there’s less of a party to be had if he does win. I think they’ve adjusted. I think the polling people in America have adjusted to their shitty polling that didn’t predict the 2016 win now. And they’re probably more accurate. I guess we’ll see when the election’s over if they’re more accurate. And so that removes that possibility. So that kind of sucks for the gamblers at home.

 

But yeah, I just don’t see the American election as exciting as it was in 2016 or in 2020. It was kind of more exciting in a way because of the whole election rig thing. That was kind of January 6th was kind of awesome, even though it was a failure that backfired massively!

 

But yeah, I do predict he will win. And Trump winning maybe you could say is good for a few reasons. Like I said that the mass deportations thing, whether he carries it out or not, just the act of the American people voting for mass deportations is good meta-politically, whether they end up getting like disappointed or it gets carried out to some extent. Also secondarily, I would say that it’s good, because I think if Harris wins, then she’s kind of more likely to go after Twitter and Rumble and a lot of these sites and try and shut down free speech or the limited amount of free speech that these sites have now enabled.

 

You know, I think around, 2021, 2022, we had peak censorship and then Rumble coming on board coming into existence. And Elon Musk buying Twitter. You can’t say absolutely anything that you want on Rumble or Twitter, but hey, you’re watching this stream right now on Rumble and Twitter, but it’s banned from YouTube. So the fact that there’s an alternative to YouTube that we can still get our message out. I was banned from Twitter until Elon Musk bought it, and I got my account back thanks to him buying Twitter. So, obviously, Twitter isn’t perfect. You know, a lot of our guys have got their accounts banned or haven’t been able to get their accounts back or whatever in the movement, but it’s still a much better platform for us to spread our message than it was two years ago. So much better! So that being preserved is so important, and I would trust the Trump administration to probably not mess with it, because it’s basically the vehicle that has enabled them to probably win this election.

 

Whereas I could see Harris going after it to try and shut down the ability for, … Not necessarily Harris herself, but whatever the handlers that will actually be running her administration, because she’s obviously like a midwit, you know, front woman. I don’t even know how she’s the one that’s been put forward. It is actually kind of crazy! That’s the best they could come up with, frankly.

 

But anyway, I don’t really foresee the Harris administration treating particularly like they’ll go after Musk because Musk has come out as a partisan, a pro-Trump partisan. I can see her administration going after Musk hard and trying to get Twitter off him in some way, in some capacity, so that they can get back control of the discourse. Like they had a stranglehold during Covid we saw the intensity of the online censorship, I think, reach its peak during that Covid time period. That’s how much control they had. We were all marginalised, basically, to Telegram. Telegram was the only app anyone used where you could have a conversation about any of our issues in an open way. I don’t want to go back to that reality. I really don’t. I don’t want to be re-ghettoized. That’s going to be brutal for our capacity to grow as a movement.

 

So I hope Trump wins for those reasons. I think they’re reasonable reasons and yeah, I haven’t heard very good counter arguments against them, frankly. But I do agree with the people that are in the nationalist movement who criticise Trump, like their criticisms are genuinely accurate.

 

[1:40:48]

 

You know, I think we should be sceptical that he will carry out mass deportations. We should be concerned about how much of a Zionist shill he is and so on. And obviously the jews, or a massive portion of the Zionist jews want Trump in for a reason. So presumably they expect they’re going to get a better deal from him than they’re getting currently from the Biden administration. It’s obviously concerning. I don’t want to be dragged into another ZOG war in the Middle East.

 

But by the same token, like I said, I don’t really see a war with Iran as really that realistic. So is that the hugest deal in the world? I don’t know. It is what it is, all things considered.

 

Obviously what is needed in the United States is for White Americans to organise around their race. Until they do that, they can’t secure their future. They’re not going to be able to secure their future for voting for Zionist civic nationalist populists like Trump, who promises deport illegal immigrants or something.

 

As I said before, the illegal component of the immigration issue is actually the less important component. The far more important component is the legal. And remember, in 2016, Trump proposed cutting legal immigration very significantly. And this time the promise has been the opposite.

 

So that’s obviously quite concerning and a step in the wrong direction. But even if he was proposing to cut legal immigration, at the end of the day, Trump, he’s not genuinely pro-White. You know, you see at the Trump rallies, they’ll have people holding up signs saying “black for Trump, Hispanics for Trump”, whatever. But there’s no one with the sign saying “Whites for Trump”. You know, he appeals to every racial demographic on the basis of their race except Whites. And that’s even that itself just isn’t good enough.

 

So Whites in America need to start organising around their identity. They need better institutions that have more money and more manpower that explicitly stand up for White Americans as White Americans unashamedly, and push for their political interests. And that should be the focus of the movement. Like, what I’ve seen with a lot of Americans in the scene is you’ve got the section that are like the Trump shills who are just super pro-Trump to the point that they seem to be kind of delusional. And then you have on the other side the anti-Trump people who just spent all their time talking about how Trump sucks!

 

And it’s like:

 

“Okay, that’s fine. Like a lot of your criticisms make sense, but like, what’s the alternative then? What else are you going to do?”

 

Like, if Trump sucks, then what? Like, I saw Richard Spencer endorsed Kamala Harris for president. It’s like your criticisms of Trump are largely accurate. But, you know what’s the point of endorsing Harris? Like, how is that going to achieve anything good? Like, it’s obviously not going to be a good administration either.

 

So, like, there needs to be more creativity and more boldness, I think, in the American scene to just push forward with not being consumed by the electoral spectacle and the team sportsism of like red versus blue, and building up independent White power in some capacity. Until that realism dawns on enough people and they get their shit together, you know, White Americans are fucked! Like, the current paradigm is not working like the Republican Party, I went through this on a show, I think, many months ago, one of these live shows.

 

I’m just going to take a sip of water here.

 

I went through this on the show, which was that there was data that came out from, I can’t remember which, if it was Pew Research or one of those other, you know, research, like polling research institutions from the United States. And they were polling non-Whites in America on their political views and their political affiliations. And what they found was that older non-Whites, like older blacks and older Hispanics who have conservative social views are still basically Democrats. They still vote for the Left even though their social views align more with the Republicans because they have a stronger sense of ethnic identity and they see the Democrats as representing their interests as non-Whites. Whereas younger blacks and younger Hispanics in particular and younger non-Whites in general. It also poll like Asians and stuff. If they have conservative views, they’re far more likely to be Republican as opposed to Democrat.

 

And also what the poll showed was that non-Whites who have more White friends are more likely to vote for the Republicans. So what it showed was that there’s been this narrative that the Republicans are basically the party of Whites and the Democrats are the party of non-Whites. But that actually is changing.

 

If you look at the trajectory of the last few election cycles, the portion of the White vote that’s gone to the Republican presidential candidate has reduced each time. So it actually reduced into Trump from the previous Republican candidates that stood before Trump and actually reduced from 2016 to 2020 with Trump. Trump lost percentage points on the White vote.

 

We’ll see at this election if he regains that or not. But the key selling point that a lot of Republicans have been saying is that they think Trump will win because he’s been making so many gains with the non-White vote. Trump got the highest non-White vote, I think, in many, many decades for a Republican as a percentage. And then he then improved on that again in 2020, and he’s on track to improve on that again in 2024.

 

[1:45:47]

 

So what we’re seeing is that the non-White vote share for the Republicans is going up and the White vote is coming down, close to 50-50. So we’ll see if that trend continues tomorrow. But if that trend continues, then in what sense would the Republicans represent White interests more than the Democrats? Because they won’t even really need to appeal to White voters. What made Trump win in 2016 was that he was able to appeal to White voters in what they call the Rust Belt states in Pennsylvania, in Michigan and Wisconsin, like working class Whites that traditionally voted Democrat that flipped to Trump. And he might be able to get those votes back, you know, tomorrow we’ll see. But the general trend is that he’s winning the Hispanics, even though he’s promising to deport all the illegals, he’s winning the legal Hispanic vote over and he’s winning the black vote over more than ever! I mean, obviously the blacks are still majority Democrat, but he’s winning a higher percentage of it, particularly young black men. So if those trends continue, the racial polarisation of American politics will diminish generation after generation, election cycle after election cycle.

 

A White Identity Politics can’t see the Republican Party as its vehicle and just do this implicit identitarianism thing anymore. It’s going to have to become explicit, it’s going to have to differentiate itself from the Republican electoral strategy, because the Republicans, a lot of their electoral strategists, are obsessed with going after the non-White vote. And it’s working! The narrative was like:

 

“Oh, it won’t work. The non-Whites will never vote for the Republicans. It’s pointless. Just focus on getting the White Vote.”

 

Well, the trends are going in the opposite direction. So that so-called racist wisdom, it’s actually incorrect and it will become increasingly incorrect, I would say.

 

So this kind of like mongrel conservatism versus mongrel liberalism thing is going to continue, and you know, it needs to be broken. Whites need to figure out how to differentiate themselves and develop explicit interest group politics in America if they want the political system to start serving White interests. That’s what every other group has and it works for every other group.

 

And the same is true in Australia, but it’s obviously different way, different political conditions to America.

 

So the same things that would work here or that make sense here don’t necessarily apply there and vice versa because the whole political system is different. But that’s basically true in any country.

 

Until we organise explicitly around our race and get money together, get resources together and have leaders that can stand forward with a professional grade, deeply funded and manpowered organisation as a leader saying I speak for my interests with massive support behind them to try and lead political power or build political power in a different direction. Then all these prevailing trends, nothing is going to kind of obstruct them. Appealing to non-Whites as our countries become increasingly non-White is going to only become, become more and more politically of benefit.

 

And as long as Whites remain deracinated and split on lines of ideology, conservative versus liberal or whatever, as opposed to becoming genuinely racially polarised, you know, it no longer becomes relevant. Like if the White vote goes 50-50 between Republican and Democrat in the coming years, what’s going to happen then is that basically it’s a competition over who can win more non-White voters on either side.

 

So that’s my view on the subject. We’ll see how things go tomorrow. Like how all the numbers come out. It’ll be interesting to analyze, I think, and it has massive implications for the world. That’s why this is interesting, because the direction that American politics go impacts everything, as we’ve discussed on the show before, many times.

 

But yeah, anyway, so that gave you a little bit more content. I’ll go through a couple of these Superchats.

 

So Maybe Danzig Crisis said, or Maccabee Danzig Crisis said:

 

“Evening, fellas. What are your thoughts on semen retention? People say it boosts virility. Do you think that’s why the Third Reich punished prisoners with masturbation machines?”

 

Okay, that’s pretty funny. [chuckling] Only the jewish mind can come up with a fantasy like that. Maccabee Danzig Crisis has also said:

 

“Victory or death via drone in bombed out weatherboard house where in our last breaths we hurl a cricket bat.”

 

Obviously that’s a reference to that you know, Hamas leader. Israel were really dumb in my opinion for uploading that video to the world. It only kind of made him look cool. They really have no self awareness. Based Henry George said:

 

“Thank you for all your work.”

 

And I appreciate that. And The Gump said:

 

“If I change my mobile signal to the Australia for the White Man stream, will you then take copyright fee every time someone calls?”

 

I don’t know what kind of question that is. Anyway, do we have any Rumble Superchats? Yeah, one from Apollo Nyanjal who said:

 

“As to earlier, the Klan being opposed to immigration from southern and Eastern Europe, it’s perfectly justified and they were vindicated in almost everything. This really is an illegitimate criticism.”

 

Yeah, as a statement, obviously, when Australia had a Nordicist immigration policy prior to World War II that would be my preference to return to something like that again in the future, to preserve the racial equality of Australia as what it is that isn’t, you know, people interpret that as me hating on southern Europeans or Slavs. No, it isn’t hating on them. It’s just that’s what we are.

 

[1:53:05]

 

So I don’t know why they would get offended by that. Like if they said:

 

“Oh, we want the immigration policy of Lithuania to be like Slavic only or something.”

 

I’m not getting upset. I don’t really care.

 

But yeah, I think that’s basically all the Superchats. So, oh no, Adolf Caesar said:

 

“Hashtag reinstate Hersant with one of those e-Roman things where you put like the little O and the slash.”

 

But yeah, I hope you guys enjoyed the show tonight. I wanted to give you guys a show because we didn’t do one last week. Like I said, we’ll be back on Thursday. I am frankly a little bit low energy. I am under the weather being a big weekend, and obviously some of the other boys, so.

 

Nevertheless, I thought it was entertaining stream. There’s a lot to cover this evening and I hope you guys enjoyed it. We’ll see you Thursday night. If you’re in Victoria enjoy your day off tomorrow. Personally, I might go down the beach or something. Hopefully it’s a nice sunny day.

 

But yeah, I guess we’ll catch you all next time. White Power! And thanks for watching.

 

[1:54:23]

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 11/5/2024 = 266)

HyperChat min: 100
DOLO
11 hours ago
I think Trump will say that he’s going to deport illegals, and the court will say no, and Trump will say “look i tried”.

5
0
Hide replies
Lampshade Denier
4 hours ago
Nobody will be deported.

2
0
ChainReaction
10 hours ago
Joel looks like he’s speaking to us from Heaven

3
0
Heeb Watch
11 hours ago
War against Iran by June 2025. I got $100 dollars on it.

1
1
MichaelB
1 hour ago
The KKK were racist liberals. They went off to fight the Nazis like good liberals and were destroyed with the Nazis as bad racists.

1
0
Lampshade Denier
4 hours ago
Far more Aussie chads than British chads…far more.

1
0
Heeb Watch
11 hours ago
What will trigger the war will be a false flag attack on the US

1
0
Wesselmania
3 hours ago
Hail, Aussie gents! Another great episode

Lampshade Denier
4 hours ago
“Grannies and retards” ha, ha, ha

WaffleStake
10 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
Heee heee. Yeah.

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago

@WaffleStake
He’s tried the Aussie accent & he was crap at it.

curonian
10 hours ago
Lithuania is not Slavic thought

WaffleStake
10 hours ago
is Tollah working on a Blair impersonation do you think?

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
Joel

WaffleStake
10 hours ago

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago
be safe brother

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago
thank you sir

DOLO
10 hours ago
cheers o/

WaffleStake
10 hours ago
where are these superchats? Rumble?

WaffleStake
10 hours ago
Sinwar

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
that’s why they uploaded it

@Six
10 hours ago
i think even if trump lost people would just say it was cheating, they will still think they have the perfect ideology and just keep losing anyway, somehow

@david_smith
10 hours ago
We should lobby/petition Qld government to have minister for White men, they have a minister specifically exclusive of White men.

Heeb Watch
10 hours ago
A Secession will occur long before white interests are presented under our current democratic model

@Six
10 hours ago
but that doesnt work, trump really needed to just lose obviously not that can be blamed on cheating again

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
^

DOLO
10 hours ago
A Trump win will be 4 years of ‘trust the plan’

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
yeah, fed false flags as backup no matter what

@Six
10 hours ago
well thee will be disappointment because nobody will do anything

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
that’s why i think trump puppet will lose, kamala puppet will stage blatant ‘steal’ to provoke a reaction – they want an excuse to get the guns n 2A

Hide replies

@Alison-Chains
3 hours ago
but on the other hand, Trump will most likely get us into a war with Iran. they’ve been trying to for decades.

@david_smith
11 hours ago
I heard he was a pagan, chat said it

@Six
11 hours ago
and they will be correct

@Six
11 hours ago
if trump lost this one, when it was so certain he would win people might think its time to make a change…any change. if trump wins they will think they got away with boomer conservative for another decade

@david_smith
11 hours ago
Trump gives handjob and sucks

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
Russia has a huge deportation for illegals currently

@david_smith
11 hours ago
Joel copied my take, not sure how though.

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
yes, Musk is a bet each way on a slow wet track…you never know

@david_smith
11 hours ago
Musk is unknown IMO, he had his kid trannied, he is from SA

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
Joel – you could always start your own twitter clone…or IRC

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
Musk is one of them

Hide replies

@Alison-Chains
3 hours ago
good old oak tree

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
twitter is 4chan

DOLO
11 hours ago
I think Striker might say that Trump lost 2020 because he turned his back on white nationalism.

@david_smith
11 hours ago
Sportsbet didn’t pay for Trump winning 2020, I don’t trust them

@david_smith
11 hours ago
Also they have a popular vote thing on sportsbet, it is not about who wins

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
jeets will take over Gov admin

DOLO
11 hours ago
jeets are the new middle managers. They’re doing exactly what Britain taught them to do, which was manage India

@david_smith
11 hours ago
The odds are even

Hitlers Ghost
11 hours ago
right .. become judges …politicians … police chiefs

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
jeets will replace blacks

Hitlers Ghost
11 hours ago
washing dishes

Hitlers Ghost
11 hours ago
good point

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
mass deportation in USA will never happen..Trump is in on it

@david_smith
11 hours ago
Bully Iran, they are too pussy to nuke Israel. I heard Iran never had a girlfriend, just saying.

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
Iran and Israel are the same thing

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
something something carparks

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
ask Iraq about invading Iran…see how it went

@david_smith
11 hours ago
That memo

Heeb Watch
11 hours ago
You can tell the voting is rigged because every single election is always close. Never will you see a blowout

@david_smith
11 hours ago
Richard Spencer disagrees, he is a deep thinker

@david_smith
11 hours ago
I think everyone should just spray a white map of Australia on their clothing, pretty easy to make a stencil.

Heeb Watch
11 hours ago
Basically they chose Trump like 8 months ago. Then celebrated it in Bohemian Grove

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago

@david_smith
make t-shirt

@david_smith
11 hours ago
270 WIN

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
Tom

@david_smith
11 hours ago
If it’s yellow, deport the fellow

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
Ballaghaderreen Concerned Citizens group – Irish child raped

@david_smith
11 hours ago
If it’s brown, flush it down.

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
Wear your flouro jackets a la dustbin men

Heeb Watch
11 hours ago
Gn Tom \o

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
BUCKAROO

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
got tip for Melb Cup Tom?

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
NSN should transcend social media

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
FK sake Joel, no reception is the best bit

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
Mercury this month

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
Food always tastes better in the bush

ReturnOfTheWhiteWarden
11 hours ago
algea sometimes causes the pink. flamingios eat the algea

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
salt

DOLO
11 hours ago

@Hess
Yeah, it said it was because there was something in the water turning it pink.

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
Did you do any Bouldering/Rock Climbing?

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
there are a few Pink Lakes

Hitlers Ghost
11 hours ago
male bonding

Hitlers Ghost
11 hours ago
cross burnings

DOLO
11 hours ago
I saw a really cool pink lake in Australia while looking for places to live, forget the name of it though, but it was beautiful.

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
Non Whites must leave Cities by sundown

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
Did you see the Aurora Australis while you were up there?

Hitlers Ghost
11 hours ago
strict zero tolerance No Mongrel policy

@david_smith
11 hours ago
It is easy af, you just need a good brush hook and someon else to clear the path

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
correct…White only spaces, no jeets allowed

Hitlers Ghost
11 hours ago
no interest loans for White men

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
Blue Mountains

Hitlers Ghost
11 hours ago
no browns in the White etho state mate

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
interest free loans for Whites…

DOLO
11 hours ago
It must have been brutal carving out a path

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
Blair

ReturnOfTheWhiteWarden
11 hours ago
no more usury

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
%

Hitlers Ghost
11 hours ago
bitter dregs

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
yes, no tax for Whites..browns pay 50

Hitlers Ghost
11 hours ago
nighty night

Heeb Watch
11 hours ago
GN Blair

Hexagod Podcasts
11 hours ago
thanks Blair!

Hexagod Podcasts
11 hours ago
no taxes for Whites

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
have a sook

Mark Collett
11 hours ago
what was the chat?

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
not the first time allegedly the guy wore shirt out and about

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
” two counts of behaving in offensive manner in/near public place and one count of stalk/intimidate intend fear physical harm”

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@Hess
Probably a rabbi

@david_smith
11 hours ago
Faruk off paki

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
guy in t-shirt was not Aussie

Dr.KAPOW
11 hours ago
blaire’s shirt the first day as a senator:

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
remember Neil Erikson’s F Islam shirts?

WaffleStake
11 hours ago
(((pressure)))

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
sooks

Hexagod Podcasts
11 hours ago
I <3 my Australian car

Dr.KAPOW
11 hours ago
i love how hes dragging his missus around while hes doing it haha

@david_smith
11 hours ago
Micro mullet boomer chad

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
BASED

@david_smith
11 hours ago
Based

Dr.KAPOW
11 hours ago
yeah boy!

WaffleStake
11 hours ago
they seem to be the ideal global homo citizen

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
bring back Idi Amin

ChainReaction
11 hours ago
women? they’ll rape anything…
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/bengal-monitor-lizard-allegedly-gang-raped-in-maharashtra-forest-four-held/article65320182.ece

Hexagod Podcasts
11 hours ago
they’re importing dots? shameful

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
deliver some pizzas

WaffleStake
11 hours ago
he drove for uber

DOLO
11 hours ago
raped a dolphin for dwali

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
serves you right for eating slop in London Blair…

DOLO
11 hours ago
no worries

Hexagod Podcasts
11 hours ago
all good Blair!

Mark Collett
11 hours ago
Still a great show!

@david_smith
11 hours ago
You don’t have to win, just getting publicity is worth it.

DOLO
11 hours ago
Remember that part in MK where he starts a civil rights movement? Me neither.

Hitlers Ghost
11 hours ago
present as moderate just to get elected …he left plays that game

Mark Collett
11 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
I agree, Woodlander is doing what needs to be done.

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
DO IT BLAIR

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago

@MarkCollett
Woodlander is pretty much on that page. The cost of politics is immense, and our funds are sparse.

Dr.KAPOW
11 hours ago
i would actually vote if i could vote for blaire.

ChainReaction
11 hours ago
Heil Prime Minister Cottrell o/ o/ o/

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
Blair could get a seat in House of Reps with twitter followers alone

Hexagod Podcasts
11 hours ago
Oh damn it’s the actual

@MarkCollett

Dr.KAPOW
11 hours ago
i cant believe these boys of all people dont see our politricks as completely staged

@david_smith
11 hours ago

@MarkCollett
This is not a thing, except at local levels.

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
good point Mark

Mark Collett
11 hours ago
Controversial take: why don’t you guys do what you’re good at like the protests and pro-white advocacy, and leave the elections to a cleaner and more electable force?

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
if you scroll down on that link you will find all the PAARTIES SINCE 1901

@david_smith
11 hours ago
The LDP only got in by weird preference shit, just like Fraser Anning only got in by a fluke

ChainReaction
11 hours ago
“He who would live must fight. He who does not wish to fight in this world, where permanent struggle is the law of life, has not the right to exist.” ~ Adolf Hitler

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
https://www.aph.gov.au/AboutParliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/00-Infosheets/Infosheet_22-_Political_parties

@david_smith
11 hours ago
Libertards are not electable, they will never get any power.

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
search – Infosheet 22 – Political parties

WaffleStake
11 hours ago
a five year moratorium on immigration would be huge

ChainReaction
11 hours ago
whatever u do, don’t vote for Dr Sukdeep Sumshit

Dawn Browning
11 hours ago
Lawson

@david_smith
11 hours ago
Vote against labor and greens then LNP

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
F endorsements…

@david_smith
11 hours ago
There used to be nationalist microparies?

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
how about no tax for White people…landslide victory

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
foreigners are not allowed to own land in Saudi Arabia, except for economic zones, commercial areas, and touristic developments

Heeb Watch
11 hours ago
I suppose I’m an accelerationist at heart. Whichever party delegitimizes the system in the eyes and hearts of the people the quickest is my ideal pick.

Hess’ Channel
11 hours ago
Ruddick is weak AF

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
Saudis have a good thing going..

@david_smith
12 hours ago
Qld could introduce a minister for the White man, because they have the opposite of that,

DOLO
12 hours ago

@Hess
Usually the system takes communists and marxists, and then spits them out as greens

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
Afd

DOLO
12 hours ago
You can’t change the system from the inside, it will inevitably change you.

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
better off taking over greens

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
only $1k to register party

DOLO
12 hours ago
lol

@ItWasMadeUp
12 hours ago
Blair should seize power

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
beer hall rebellion

Dr.KAPOW
12 hours ago
if blaire took pauline hanson’s spot id start voting.

DOLO
12 hours ago
Chad Yes

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
remember they jailed PH

Dawn Browning
12 hours ago

@HitlersGhost
K. I’ll shut up now.

DOLO
12 hours ago

@Smokey
o/

Dawn Browning
12 hours ago
1N = Pressure Valve for Boomers

Smokey
12 hours ago

@DOLO
thanks

Smokey
12 hours ago
holy shit, I can’t believe I caught the live version.

DOLO
12 hours ago

@Smokey
yes

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
Moira Deeming is the next Boudicca

Smokey
12 hours ago
Is this live?

Hitlers Ghost
12 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
relax Dawn

DOLO
12 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
Hey, there is nothing wrong with inbreeding, look at the jews as a fine example lol

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
yes, PH will go..

Dawn Browning
12 hours ago
Punkin Night was an ancient way to honour ancestors & not become in-bred at a time when we were secluded in our small villages. I can’t believe you don’t know this.

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
energy drink arc

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
Hanson also lost the Fed Court case with Faruqi

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
One Nation are redundant..move on.

Dawn Browning
12 hours ago
In the UK/England, we used to use turnips as lanterns, NOT pumpkins

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
Blair just read the comment look

Dawn Browning
12 hours ago

@MarkCollett
‘Morning

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
get Mark on…Blair is boring now

Hitlers Ghost
12 hours ago
Mr. Mark Collette has joined the chat

ChainReaction
12 hours ago
Salute C o7

@MarkCollett

DOLO
12 hours ago

@ChainReaction
I need to finish the last 30mins, which i hear is the best.

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
K8 – oxycodone

Heeb Watch
12 hours ago

@MarkCollett
\o

Dawn Browning
12 hours ago
Halloween goes back to Punkie Night.

Mark Collett
12 hours ago
Hi guys!

DOLO
12 hours ago
We even had a guy go around in a santa sled pulled by a car lol

ChainReaction
12 hours ago
get this in ya
https://hurawatch.cc/movie/watch-the-birth-of-a-nation-online-12555

DOLO
12 hours ago
I used to really like halloween, it was pretty big when i grew up in England.

Hitlers Ghost
12 hours ago
if only

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
KKKK – four K’s

ChainReaction
12 hours ago
Birth of a Nation was played in the White House ffs

Hexagod Podcasts
12 hours ago
Best halloween costume ever

DOLO
12 hours ago
KKK Classics would be an excellent brand name for sneakers.

ChainReaction
12 hours ago
^

Dangdol
12 hours ago
very rich history with the KKK

Hitlers Ghost
12 hours ago
imagine not being racist smh

Hexagod Podcasts
12 hours ago
I’m not racist. I’m a specist

Heeb Watch
12 hours ago
Prolly some Jews got it banned reporting it for inciting violence, when it clearly was humor and nothing of the sort

@david_smith
12 hours ago
Write in DD if you are in the US

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
KKKK democrats

Hexagod Podcasts
12 hours ago
I liked it

ChainReaction
12 hours ago
Kool Kids Klub

Hitlers Ghost
12 hours ago

Hexagod Podcasts
12 hours ago
LOL

@david_smith
12 hours ago
Spooky ghost Halloween costume

ChainReaction
12 hours ago
hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

@Ral9010NatSoc
12 hours ago
lol

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
the Vodafone costume

@david_smith
12 hours ago
Last time a went to KFC was served by a mexican 16yo with a nice mustache.

Hexagod Podcasts
12 hours ago
Best meal is fresh salmon, no goyslop
More

Hitlers Ghost
12 hours ago
Body Built By KFC

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
Jeets foot burgers

Dawn Browning
12 hours ago
UK pub dinners are expensive, these days

ChainReaction
12 hours ago
eat nothing but kfc zingers, got it o7

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
I said Blair was starved…everyone laughed

Hitlers Ghost
12 hours ago
it even looks beautiful raw

Dawn Browning
12 hours ago
Sounds more like Nando’s

DOLO
12 hours ago
You have to buy butchers bought meat, the store meat is garbage.

Hitlers Ghost
12 hours ago

@DOLO
for no reason whatsoever

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
yes, all Aus good beef goes to Japs

Dawn Browning
12 hours ago
It depends who you know in England

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
better meat?

Hitlers Ghost
12 hours ago
these lads make me feel old

DOLO
12 hours ago

@ChainReaction
Nothing to see here

DOLO
12 hours ago
Maybe we grow into the area that is around us, so if the area is larger like US/Aus, then the human can grow bigger. Like goldfish lol

Hitlers Ghost
12 hours ago

@ChainReaction

ChainReaction
12 hours ago
nothing sus, mate
Less

@david_smith
12 hours ago
Some Australian areas with pretty bad soil produce better tasting lamb, according to some people.

SS-Super-Soldier
12 hours ago
why would you eat such goy slop?

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
Argentinian beef is from Corowa?

Hitlers Ghost
12 hours ago
is there anything better than an awesome piece of beef

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
green from all the Jeet street shitters shitting in the pashturrs

Hitlers Ghost
12 hours ago
it’s the peat lads….peat

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
Blair those glasses though..

Heeb Watch
12 hours ago
America has multiple states where they claim their beef is the best, but it all comes from Kansas, I know because I deliver it.

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
green is from the lack of Potassium..

@david_smith
12 hours ago
They fuck up the lamb

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
Juden ist gross in der Englander …polluted

Hess’ Channel
12 hours ago
Achtung

SS-Super-Soldier
12 hours ago
there is a lot of Jew mixed Brits unfortunately

DOLO
12 hours ago
I would accept that criticism. I noticed how many nordic women are in Australia, for instance.

Hitlers Ghost
12 hours ago
Brits are very well behaved

Hexagod Podcasts
12 hours ago
heil our guys holding down under! \o

the woodlander
12 hours ago
just a normal day in London

Heeb Watch
12 hours ago
Great speech at PA Blair! \o

JeremiahDoomjunkieJohnson
12 hours ago
Less

JeremiahDoomjunkieJohnson
13 hours ago
o/

Dawn Browning
14 hours ago

@Woodlader.4
Simon I can’t wait to hear what Blair says about you

Dawn Browning
14 hours ago
Northern UK accent: “Am reet lookin’ forrrard t’this”.

the woodlander
14 hours ago
good to meet blair at the PA conference

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

/>

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Aaron Spreadbury: All right, so our final speaker today needs no introduction, but he’s going to get one anyway! He has been in nationalism for over 20 years, and there isn’t much that he hasn’t seen. He is the founder and the leader of the largest nationalist organisation in the United Kingdom, and he has led Patriotic Alternative with both wisdom and courage. And without his efforts, none of us would be here today.

 

So please put your hands together and give a hearty round of applause for the one and only Mark Collett!

 

[loud applause]

 

Mark Collett: Firstly, before I start speaking, I just want to say a huge thank you to everyone who came here today. To see us packing out a room like this for what, the fifth year in a row is incredible! The momentum we’ve built and the momentum we’ve maintained over the last five years, people often credit to me. But it’s not really me who did this, it’s us!

 

So when people are giving myself a round of applause, I do appreciate that. But the round of applause should be extended to everyone who is part of our community, because first and foremost, that is what Patriotic Alternative is all about.

 

Now, there is an overused analogy that I am sure everyone in this room will be familiar with. And that analogy is about boiling a frog.

 

But in case you are the one person in the room that hasn’t heard of this analogy before, it’s based around the idea that if you were going to boil a frog, which I don’t recommend, by the way, but if you were, and you were going to boil that frog alive in a pan of water, you’re better off putting the frog in cold water, placing the pan on the stove and gently turning up the heat so the frog doesn’t know that it’s being boiled alive, until it’s too late. The converse of this is, of course, you just throw the frog into a pan of bubbling water on the stove and it jumps right out and it escapes!

 

Now, obviously, everyone in this room today can understand why this analogy has been used so often, as it clearly applies directly to the struggle that we are in. Since 1945, there have been sweeping changes to almost every aspect of British life. And if you took a snapshot of Britain in, let’s say, 1950, and compared it to the Britain that we live in today, I think we’d all agree [sound cut out] … Fresh water from a stream with bubbling hot water sat in a pan on a stove. And we didn’t go from 1945 to 2024 in a heartbeat or even in a short period of time. It took us over three quarters of a century. That’s longer than the average lifespan of the people who were alive when all of those changes were set in motion. The changes were drip fed to the public.

 

And in terms of the analogy that I began with, the analogy of the frog in the pan, the heat was turned up so very slowly over such a lengthy period of time. But here today in Britain in 2024, I finally think that the overused analogy of the frog being boiled is starting to lose its relevance. As since the election of Keir Starmer and the current Labour government, the heat has been turned up so quickly that I think it would be impossible for anyone not to notice! In fact, the heat has been turned up so quickly that nearly everyone is talking about it now.

 

Now, as people have said, I’ve been around for a long time and it was once common for nationalists like myself who engaged with the public to be turned away or dismissed on the grounds that we were talking nonsense! I’ve spent over two decades trying to convince the public of both the reality and the gravity of the situation that we as a race and nation face. I have first hand knowledge of the way the public dismissed us.

 

Believe it or not, there was once a time when you could speak to members of the public and they didn’t believe mass immigration was even an issue. And they certainly would not have entertained the idea that White Britons would ever have faced the prospect of being a minority in their ancestral homeland.

 

What’s more, if you tried to inform people that as this process would take place, not only would White Britons be the ones to pay financially for the transition, but during that transition they would become an underclass, many people used to roll their eyes. They would even laugh and mock you for what you were saying.

 

To many, the future that we warned of was simply preposterous! It was a fantasy! Or worse still, it was a conspiracy theory! And I’ve had that argument thrown into my face more times than I care to remember.

 

But over the last three and a half months, things have changed dramatically. There has been a massive, a seismic political shift in Britain. A shift that has been overseen and stage managed by what is undoubtedly the most nakedly anti-White and pro-migrant government this country has ever seen! One that puts both the Blair and Sunak regimes to shame. This shift is the equivalent of turning up the heat under the pan, not by several degrees, but by such a factor that the frog immediately takes note.

 

Who would have thought back in June that less than four months later we would have seen the murder of three little White girls by the son of migrants? Spontaneous mass anti-migrant protests on the streets of cities the length and breadth of the country. A brutal police clampdown like nothing we have ever witnessed before. 24 hour politicised courts being convened to deal with speech and thought criminals! The Prime Minister going on television to tell us he is forming special police forces to simply focus on Internet hate crimes. New legislation is now being draughted to criminalise those who speak out against migration.

 

[09:38]

 

But on top of all of that, there is a raft of new economic cash grabs, including a discriminatory policy that withdraws vital winter fuel payments from over 10 million, overwhelmingly White, pensioners in order to ensure that a raft of diverse and progressive policies can still be funded. But whilst all this is happening, whilst Labour is stripping us of our rights and signing off on what could effectively be a policy that leads to a cull of elderly White Britons, they have also been preparing an amnesty for over 100,000 illegal immigrants, as well as removing the final few remaining blockades to migrants entering the country.

 

And all these new Britons that are going to be granted the right to stay here, they won’t be facing the same financial crisis that us true Brits will! As Labour is committed to spending millions, if not billions, on making sure these people are cared for in every way imaginable! I have to emphasise this again, this is all within four months of Starmer being elected. They have not just turned up the temperature a little, they have gone straight to gas Mark 10 in the blink of an eye.

 

And on top of that, they are not even trying to hide it! Now at one time governments, especially the Conservatives, always the Conservatives, would usually dangle a carrot in order to soften the blow. But the current Labour establishment are so totally shameless and anti-White that they don’t even do that! Things have changed so much so that I don’t think going up to people and talking about migration and the idea of Whites becoming a minority would be something that anyone contested anymore.

 

Now, sure, I think you would find liberals out there, and those liberals would say:

 

“Yeah, the demographic shift is happening.”

 

And they’d be celebrating it. But they’d still admit that it was happening. They would say:

 

“They celebrated it.”

 

Rather than denying it.

 

But more importantly than accepting the facts on migration, which are of course important, is the fact that people are now aware that we live under a two tier system. A two tier system is in place where the indigenous people of these islands are automatically placed at a disadvantage when compared to both new arrivals and those from ethnic minority backgrounds.

 

Now, granted, the rules are a little more complex than what I have just stated, obviously White Britons who are part of the ruling elite, Whites who are part of far-Left organisations, or Whites who are part of degenerate, sickening subcultures, will get a pass. But normal White working folk are now clearly Second Class citizens! And worse still, if you are White and if you’re speaking out against mass immigration, multiculturalism or talking about demographic change, you will be treated as the lowest of the low! And you will have fewer rights than any other group in the country!

 

Now this in itself is not news to anyone in this room. We’ve known this was coming for a long time. We know if a member of an anti-fascist organisation punches someone, the police don’t care. If a nationalist defends himself and it’s self defence, you’re getting arrested. If a young black male sets fire to the Union Jack at the Cenotaph, it’s a suspended sentence. If a young White male kicks a policeman because three little White girls were murdered, it’s off to jail for 26 months!

 

And again, this isn’t news to us. We’ve seen this creeping up. We’ve known this was coming for years and we’ve spent, some of us, decades trying to warn the public.

 

But in the last few months, the dam has finally broken, when it comes to talking about this issue. The issue of “two tier policing” has gone mainstream. The term has been used in Parliament, in the media and in almost every major newspaper. The heat has been turned up so quickly that not even the press can deny what is happening. And the public are no longer deriding or ignoring what we say. They are openly voicing our talking points, which are increasingly becoming part of the everyday discourse in workplaces, in social clubs, in pubs and in homes all over Britain. This is a watershed moment for nationalists here in the UK! And it represents not some small or incremental shift, but a massive jump! But that jumps before you all start celebrating presents both great opportunities, but also serious dangers.

 

Let’s start with the good stuff. Let’s start with the opportunities. Never before has immigration been such a hot topic. Never before have so many people been openly concerned about demographic change. This isn’t just reflected in the way normal people are speaking. We’ve seen a massive change in the way that formerly race blind politicians, content creators, and influencers are reporting on the issue of immigration and anti-White policymaking. All of a sudden there is a palpable fear about the prospect of the UK becoming a country where the indigenous population are a minority. And there is also this growing concern of how White people would be treated if they were a minority. Even Nigel Farage has finally spoken about the ethnic makeup of our cities and even made an election pledge about deporting people.

 

Finally, the world is accepting the talking points that we have pushed for generations. The truth is breaking through!

 

[17:55]

 

However, we should not rejoice too much, because there’s a lot of negatives to this as well. The obvious negative is the way that Keir Starmer and the Labour government are approaching this mass awakening. In short, they are set on two courses of action.

 

The first is that they wish to accelerate mass immigration into Britain. The establishment have clearly acknowledged that there is a race going on between migration and the public consciousness of migration. On one hand, migration is increasing, but on the other, the public are now more aware that migration is this big threat and that it affects their lives in so many ways.

 

The race taking place now will decide whether Whites will become a minority before they become racially conscious enough on a wide enough scale to prevent themselves from becoming a minority. And the establishment is not run by idiots. They know how crucial this race is! Starmer and his cabinet know that if White people were to wake up before they were outnumbered, the game is up! Migration is ending, it will be reversed and we will remain a majority.

 

On the other hand, conversely, they also know if they can increase migration and Whites slip under a certain percentage of the population, it’s effectively game over! White Britons at that point will be destined to minority status!

 

So the first course of action the Starmer government will be set upon is to speed up White replacement to levels that we have never seen before. And on top of all of that, they have something going in their favour. They already know that we are reaching that tipping point, that the point of no return is not very far off at this juncture. With hundreds of thousands of White Britons leaving the country every year to run from this nightmare, with millions of migrants coming in with birth rates being overwhelmingly in favour of migrant communities, they will surely at this point, think that victory is in their grasp.

 

And if you want a bit of perspective on this isn’t just me saying this, I’m going to give you the latest figures. It was either this week or last week a report was published. Over the last 12 months. For the first time since 1976, deaths outstripped births here in the UK. Now, you don’t have to be a genius to work out that should lead to a falling population. Yes? But over the same 12 months, our population grew by the fastest rate it ever has in history! We cannot hide from the fact that we are now being replaced faster than we ever have before.

 

Now, you think that’s bad, but their second, and I said that was the first course of action. Their second course of action is actually worse than the first. And I know what you’re thinking, how on earth could something be worse than speeding up mass immigration to the point where we become a minority even faster? Well, it’s simple.

 

Their second course of action is to effectively terrorize White people so that even if Whites become racially conscious on a much larger scale, most of those who understand the truth will be too scared, too browbeaten, to ever speak out about the issue! Effectively meaning that the racially conscious White Britons will sit in silence rather than stand up and join our chorus of dissent.

 

Now, the astute amongst you will have noticed I used a term there. I said “terrorize”. And I use that term for a specific reason. You see, whilst the government loves to use the word “terrorism” to describe those who espouse views that they don’t like, there is a bitter irony to them using that word in such a way. You see, the words “terrorism” and “terrorist” came into English use as translations of words used in France during the period known as “The Reign of Terror” that took place between 1793 and 1794.

 

And during that era, the newly installed French government punished, usually by death, those people who were thought to be against the ongoing revolution. Those words came into existence thanks to a gruesome and protracted period of state sponsored violence. It is quite amazing really. The words terrorism and terrorist were originally words used to describe brutal acts of oppression by the State directed against those who spoke out against the state. Or in many cases, those acts of brutal oppression were used against people who were merely perceived to be going against the state. And that is exactly what we’re seeing here now in Britain!

 

When you see mothers dragged out of their homes for social media posts, when you see working men sent to prison for shouting at police officers, and when you see hard working fathers jailed for minor offences like throwing a traffic cone towards police officers we are living in times of political oppression that can only be described as “state sponsored terror”! We are moving toward a point where holding the wrong opinions will be seen as almost a capital crime, where saying the wrong words to the wrong person will see you receive a sentence longer than what a sex offender would receive.

 

And this worrying shift towards a complete and total clampdown on freedom of speech and freedom of expression is exactly what I would have predicted from this Labour government. This clampdown has the potential to be the most comprehensive in history, because it is backed by a surveillance state that is unrivaled!

 

But just as worryingly, it will also be supported by the same disgusting, sniveling people who snitched on their neighbours during the Covid lockdowns. The kind of people who phoned the police when people on their street didn’t come out of their homes at the allotted time to clap like demented seals for the NHS.

 

Make no mistake, we are now presented with the greatest opportunity that nationalists have seen in a lifetime! But we are also presented with the most draconian laws, the most oppressive system, and a surveillance network that makes anything written in 1984 look like a joke!

 

[27:50]

 

But the talk of this takes me back to a different time, a time when I was a young man and how politics was when I first joined this struggle. When I first got involved, I joined the BNP. At the time, the BNP was trying to hide their re-migration policy. The party played down talk of sending people home. We never spoke of it, we never featured it in publicity material and we actually treated it as if it was our dirty little secret. It was something that we spoke of behind closed doors.

 

We called it the Repatriation Policy. And the party watered it down! Hid it on their website, and had a policy of never speaking about it, never putting it on leaflets, never talking about it at meetings, and definitely never, ever mentioning it in a media interview!

 

Today, however, several decades on “re-migration” is a buzzword. For the first time in my lifetime, re-migration is a rallying cry that is posted tens of thousands of times a day on social media. Deportation is demanded by sitting MPs. Normal people are discussing sending them back!

 

[applause]

 

Remigration for the first time in a generation is seen not just as a viable solution, but as a necessary solution! Remigration is not just the battle cry of nationalists, but something that normal people are now openly desiring. Remigration is now rightly seen as the only solution that can save us from becoming a minority. It is what we need in order to survive!

 

But before we celebrate and before we cheer, there is a flip side to that. Remigration is also a term that could soon become illegal. Calls for re-migration and deportation could well be outlawed as terms that are “likely to stir up racial hatred”. And I say “likely” because that is the new word that will be the new bar when deciding whether speech is hate speech. At one time, speech would have to be abusive, insulting or threatening.

 

But now the Labour government wished to change this to the lower threshold of merely “likely to stir up racial hatred”.

 

So on one hand, we see a golden opportunity, we see progress and we see the public increasingly accepting our talking points in larger and larger numbers. And most of all, we are finally seeing re-migration being discussed, normalised and even adopted in other Western nations.

 

But on the other hand, we have these draconian laws, a surveillance state, two tier justice and a clampdown on our freedoms that even George Orwell would never have predicted. Make no mistake my friends, this is a high stakes game. Everything is on the line! All the chips are on the table! And we stand to gain everything. But we also stand to personally forfeit everything if the state singles us out for persecution.

 

And I’m not going to stand here and lie to you. The risk is real. There are people now in jail cells serving multi-year sentences for saying the wrong thing, attending the wrong protest, or even publishing stickers that the Crown stated were completely legal.

 

So the question that people will ask me is:

 

“Where do we go from here?”

 

Well, we are going to do something that no other group has ever attempted to do here in the UK.

 

Firstly, we will remain as the community building group we have always been. At the centre of everything we do will remain this community, but we will become an indigenous rights advocacy and pressure group. The only group in the UK that will fight for the rights of the indigenous people of this country who face discrimination, abuse or even jail. We will use this community that we have built to be both a support network and a shield wall for those whom the system attacks.

 

And the thing that makes me the most proud is that we have already begun doing this. Since the recent anti-migrant protests, we as a community have already raised £15,000 for the families of those who have been jailed for either speech crimes, non-crimes, such as shouting at the police, or being present when disorder took place, and for people who were jailed for minor infractions.

 

[applause]

 

And this is a bold move, not just because no one else is doing it, but also because I believe it’s the one thing our people need the most. They need a community that stands behind them when the state comes knocking on their door!

 

But that sadly brings me to the most uncomfortable part of what I’m going to say today. With this clampdown, with this high stakes battle for our future, with tensions in the country reaching boiling point and with political persecution reaching levels that we have never seen before, I expect that some people who were once very active in this movement will take their leave. The idea of going to jail or becoming a social pariah will simply be too much for them. These people will look at political prisoners like Sam Melia, and whilst they will admire them and want to support them, they will be terrified of being in their shoes.

 

Some people will now decide certain things can’t be discussed. They will quietly fall in line with the government’s new mandates, and they will behave like trained dogs, understanding exactly what their masters expect of them.

 

But I’m sure there is a question here for me. What will I do? And I say I because I am speaking for me. And on this topic, I can’t speak for you. But I will carry on despite the associated risks, because I believe more than anything that what we do is right!

 

[standing applause]

 

And people have asked me this. When I say people, I mean members of the public, people in this room, my friends, even my family. They’ve said:

 

“Mark, is this worth going to jail for? Was this all worth losing your bank accounts? Was this all worth becoming a social pariah that can’t do many of the things that normal people do?”

 

And I look at them and smile and say:

 

“The answer is unequivocally yes!”

 

[applause]

 

[38:11]

 

You see, sometimes in life there are bigger things at stake than your own individual well being, your own financial security, and your own social status. From a young age, I acknowledged that the most important thing was the survival of people of European descent!

 

[applause]

 

I acknowledged that if we as a people cease to exist, anything that I achieve as an individual in my life would be irrelevant. And now I look at the current situation and I know the risks are greater than ever! I know the establishment will continue to tighten the noose around our necks, choking our freedoms.

 

But I have done this for long enough to know that the establishment’s actions do not come from a place of strength. Instead, they come from a place of fear and uncertainty. The establishment knows that the cracks in the Multicultural Project are growing by the day. And that’s why they are desperate to pass these new laws as they know the truth is breaking through. And their only hope now is not to hide the truth, because they can’t do that anymore! Their only hope now is to stop people speaking the truth that they already know! They aren’t jailing nationalists because they’re winning. They are jailing nationalists because they’re finally losing their grasp on power!

 

And that’s why, at this crucial juncture, despite the increased risks, I believe it is time to grit our teeth, to dig our heels in and fight harder:

 

“But what about our freedom?”

 

People will cry. Well, the answer to that is simple. Being free is about being able to live as you wish. Being able to say what you want, to be able to do what you please, and to associate with those whom you love. If you can’t do those things, if you choose to self censor, and if you give up on your beliefs, if you are forced to turn your back on your comrades and friends, one thing is for sure, you are not free. You are a prisoner in their system. But worse still, you are a prisoner by consent! And I for one, am not going to consent to being a prisoner of their system. I do not consent to spending my life on my knees for anyone. Especially not a system that despises me, my family, my friends and my people.

 

[applause]

 

My message today is clear. Despite the hardships, despite the increasing oppression, and despite what may seem like overwhelming odds, we will never be silenced!

 

But more so, we will give a voice to those who the system tries to silence. We will be the support network for the most oppressed, trampled people in this country, white people who dare to oppose their own replacement. We are engaged in this struggle because we understand one thing. The most precious thing in the whole world is our people! And the survival of our people is non-negotiable!

 

So despite the increasing tyranny that we face, we will never stop fighting. And even if our brave comrades are arrested and dragged away from their families and imprisoned, their heads will not be bowed, their flame will not dim, and they will not be forgotten. Quite the opposite in fact. Their heads will be held up high. Their names will be known by more people than they could ever have imagined. Their fight against this system will be spoken of not only the length and breadth of the country, but it will be spoken of all over the Western world.

 

Because those who dare to fight in the darkest of times are the heroes that will ensure that tomorrow belongs to us!

 

Thank you.

 

[44:10]

 

[long, stand up applause]

 

[44:35]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 11/3/2024 = 40)

@The_Real_Batman
1 day ago
I honestly think now, the political route is not where effort should be given.
The woodlander did make a good point on this subject. Creating a community of sorts is the most beneficial method.

13
0
Hide replies
Mark Collett
1 day ago
I agree!

5
0
the woodlander
1 day ago
i agree

3
0
Open Borders for Israel
1 day ago
$5.00
Mark Collett is the bravest man in the UK

11
0
Hide replies

@Spectromancer
1 day ago
He has been very effective within the wiggle room you have.

2
0

@cheflad
1 day ago
Great Speech.

7
0
ThinRedLine
1 day ago
Great speech, acknowledging the problem is the first step to solving it

6
0
Hide replies

@Spectromancer
1 day ago
The message is still being suppressed but I’m optimistic.

3
0
Hide replies
ThinRedLine
1 day ago
I am optimistic as well all we need is a certain number of our people to wake up and wanting to do something about it and it is game over for them

2
0
the woodlander
1 day ago
community is everythig.

4
0

@Andy1967UK
1 day ago
Great speech
Play @ 1.25speed

2
0

@PureNomad
1 day ago
$14.88
So soon after listening to Ayatollah’s speech… its hard to listen without thinking of his Collett impersonation
Good speech mate, agree that we are no longer frogs being slow cooked, we are being roasted alive screaming.

4
0

@6079SmithW
1 day ago
God bless you Mr. Collett.

4
0
megazord
1 day ago
The All-time Anglo

4
0

@WhiteLightKnight
1 day ago
Superb speech. Difficult to see anything in this speech that wouldn’t chime with the vast majority people in this country.

2
0
Rusty-Hinge
1 day ago
Bravo Mark.
Excellent speech. I wholeheartedly agree with every point, especially regarding our own advocacy group.

2
0
Cone of Silence
1 day ago
Hey Mark, changing the hearts and minds of people is a gigantic task for sure.
When someone makes a stand we see the response from governments and lobbiests.
We always view the job ahead as one of alienation of immigrants and they are left out of any conversation, they are essentially bystanders watching their host country’s implode.
I think we should use these groups more effectively to wake the NPC’s up.
By use, I mean have conversations with them on their views
, what would they do if in our situation or if it happened in their country’s and what solutions would they take.
Actually what would they do to their government if such crimes happened in their lands.
The responses no doubt would be one’s that would shock the people sitting on the fence.

@Spectromancer
1 day ago
I have to disagree with the boiling frog analogy for the US. All the signs were there but Americans, especially fluoride and lead poisoned boomers, just didn’t care. They still don’t care.

@Spectromancer
1 day ago
Is Irish Nationalism compatible with British Nationalism? I’m neither just curious.

0
0
=============

BitChute Comments

Facing the Storm – PA Conference Speech 2024
639 Views – 2 days ago
Channel
Mark Collett
23.2K Subscribers
MarkCollett
Sensitivity – Normal (BBFC 12)
My speech from the 2024 Patriotic Alternative Conference. Ways you can help contribute to my work:
BitCoin: bc1qzgjz953f4gznway0hvz6lx360yd2autdkwf6nu
Etherium: 0xb44739a8f2c57Cad38F96Aab8F2a0cA18258A7bA
BitCoin Cash: qpaaukrttfvq0j99gfl43hhs5q0tmhzfevkhp3r2c9
Monero: 42qypZQGMzNfFa5yXBxkqxL4iDw5cm…
Show more

2 hours ago
JamesWood
Smashingly good speech, unbelievable that PA isn’t the number 1 most popular party in the UK right now.

14 hours ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Massive immigration. Industry is more concentrated than ever in fewer and fewer hands. Retail is disappearing. So where are they needed?
Edited 13 hours ago
1
0

9 hours ago
Pensive11
In demographic numbers. They’re here to replace us, and they’re doing a great job. Not long to go now.
1
0

2 hours ago
JamesWoodPensive11
It’s nearly game over. It will be game over by 2050

19 hours ago
Intro Skipper
Duke & Slattery show was worth a listen.

a day ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Payback for saving those poor jews and letting them write the Versailles treaty.
2
0

a day ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Trump is the next Churchill. WW3 in 2025. Expect amnesty for illegals and more legal immigrants, and the worst draconian hate laws for speaking up, esp against jews, who everyone knows control money, credit and media. Rothschilds control the Sqare Mile City of London and the Bank of England and banks across the world.u
1
0

a day ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.
Trump is a chicken, both of them are. When crowds chanted to Hitler SIEG HEIL,Hail victory, Hitler said to them, change that word Sieg, to Kampf, Battle. Kampf Heil, hail the battle. Thats what is coming!
Edited a day ago
0
1

a day ago
totenkopfelite
Bravo and Hail Victory
1
0

2 days ago
50Quid
Mark, don’t ever call me a comrade.
0
3

2 days ago
50Quid
Oh yes, before I forget you will have BBBEE (Broad Based Black economic empowerment) If you are a white man “YOU WILL” have a non-white business partner who “WILL” own a 51% stake hold of your company so that in a few years once he has learned the in’s and out’s of your business he can turn around and legally fire you and there’s [show more]

2 days ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Don’t blink ’cause for all the black-empowerment bullshit, Asians/Indians/Chinese are real the benefactors. Where I work, they cry about “not doing enough for blacks” while the office is 80% Chinese/Indian. Blacks will be prominent in media/movies/Hollywood, but I don’t expect them to be in the boardrooms across the country.
1
0

a day ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
That same story about blacks has been going on before the 60s when I came into the world. And its the same bullshit still today. After more than 5 decades blacks HAVE GONE BACKWARDS and taken countries backwards. If they are so great like the movies, why is every black country in history – an absolute shithole and worse?
2
0

2 days ago
50Quid
Wait for AA and BEE/DEI.
You will not be able to even get a job because you are white!
1
0

2 days ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.
It should be clear to any thinking person the nonsense when authorities tell you those masses are needed to keep the economy going. First principle, the economy serves the people – the people dont serve the economy. And millions of semi-literates, racists and criminals who never built a pinhead in their existence can only irreparably destroy what whites have built up over centuries.
7
0
Hide replies

2 days ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Did EMJ ban you. What a pos EMJ is.
Edited a day ago

2 days ago
TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Whites shitting on Whites are far more dangerous than any jew. And unfortunately the White race is full of traitors and liberals. Apparently selling books or a good job is worth throwing lesser brothers under the bus and giving the country away.
Edited 2 days ago
3
0

a day ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Just dont call Jones a jew, like I did, or he will block you.You can call a jew anything but when you call him jew, he is exposed. EMJ is a jew, hiding behind Catholic religion. Notice how he slanders us White peoples and everything that s of white Europe. And all his garbage”categories”. Jones has German jewish heritage. Thats [show more]
Edited a day ago
2
0

a day ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.TheWestIsBeingDestroyed
Sadly those whites(I have brothers like that), just cant see through the fraud. They have no other background and have been educated in MU, Minneapolis Uni and Hollywood jewish poison. They are warped. It is devastating. The only salvation, for me, is to know the deepest truth. Its a solitary journey.
Edited a day ago
3
0

2 days ago
glasiad
The future is NOT in political parties of any stripe. The future lies in direct representatives answerable and accountable only to their constituents.
6
0

2 days ago
Lord Haw-Haw PHD.
I think Mark Collett is an excellent speaker and person. And I entirely support his mission.
12
0

2 days ago
Colin-Mark
I concur
4

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

A Message to the Anti-White System – Laura Towler’s 2024 PA Conference Speech – Oct 19, 2024 – Transcript

Patriotic Alternative – Hope is Our Duty – Blair Cottrell’s 2024 PA Conference Speech – Oct 19, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

/>

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Aaron Spreadbury: Our fifth speaker today is a man with a jaw like an anvil and shoulders you could land a plane on. His anecdotes are legendary and his tangents infamous. It’s been quite the journey for him to get here, all the way from the other side of the world in sunny Australia, and I’m thrilled that he could be here today.

 

It’s Blair Cottrell!

 

[loud applause]

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, here I am in England. Huh? This is the first time leaving Australia for me, so I didn’t begin with anything small. I’ve literally gone on the other side of the planet. And the flight was long and uncomfortable, but it was worth it.

 

This is a beautiful country, great architecture, and the people have been really welcoming. I appreciate that. There’s a certain nostalgia that I sense or feel being here in England that I can’t explain because I personally have not been here before. But it’s where we Australians hail from, and I feel and sense that in my soul. And I think that really it’s significant to me to be back in the motherland. And we still consider it the motherland. As Australians, it is regarded as that.

 

[applause]

 

So there’s certain similarities, too, in Australia that portray the British character of my country. I noticed in London when we were exploring some of the architecture, the places seem similar. Much larger scale, of course, but similar to some of the architecture in my home city, Melbourne.

 

Very great to be here, and I’m glad to be speaking before you now. A little bit apprehensive about this, to be honest, because it’s been a few years since I’ve addressed a crowd of any size, and unfortunately for me, I’m tasked with addressing you fine people who are probably more well read than me, most of you, and very politically minded. It’s actually harder to talk to a smaller group of people than it is to talk to a larger group.

 

And the reason for that is because people, on average, are more feminine than they are masculine, and masculinity is in short supply. Probably shorter than ever, for reasons we understand. But the more people you have, let’s say we have 500, a thousand people, then on average, the more feminine that crowd is and the more emotion appeals to them.

 

But I can’t imagine I’m going to be too charged with passion in this speech, because all of you here are already thinking and understanding the things that I think and understand. So I thought I’d make my speech more pragmatic.

 

And a little bit has been said today about talking to people, and I thought maybe I could share my perspective of how to talk to people and how to win people over to our community, to build our community larger. And it’s important, I think, always to bear in mind and understand that people have been exposed to quite a lot of propaganda for quite a lot of years, right? And the mind of a person, you must imagine it like a soil into which you’re planting a seed, right?

 

Now, unfortunately, the system understands this better than we do, perhaps because it gets them young and it plants the seeds early. But the system does not force things onto people as much as we think it does. It doesn’t force messages and propaganda. It nurtures over time.

 

And the only way to change people’s minds is often to do the same thing, to plant a seed in the mind of the person and give it a little bit of water only when it needs it, a little bit of a push here and there. You can’t get frustrated with people if you don’t change their mind straight away, especially when you consider that it’s taken 15 to 20 years for people to actually get to the point that they’re at now. And most people, on an individual basis, you’ll find, still have sensible ideas when you talk to them as individuals. But unfortunately, when they fall under the influence of the masses, those ideas dissipate and disappear because they’re scared of being the outcast.

 

And this is completely normal human behaviour. Right? So don’t despair and always have patience when you’re speaking to people, you only need to say a few words. You only need to give people that little push in the right direction. Plant the seed, water it here and there, don’t drown it with too much at once. You don’t need to say too much. And in time, you’ll find that you can re-subvert people back to a better way of thinking, back to our way of thinking, which is completely natural and reasonable. It’s important to remember that.

 

So I’ve written down a few notes here in my phone because I haven’t had a great deal of time to prepare this. And also in regards to talking to people, there’s a principle by which influencing people becomes easy, and that’s authenticity. The power of authenticity!

 

And that means you have to authentically believe what you’re saying. When you do believe what you’re saying you don’t need to say as much. You can use fewer words because, charged with the power of authenticity, your words carry more weight!

 

So that’s the beauty of authenticity and what we want to build in people is a hope! A hope which you can also describe as faith. Because hope is what convinces men to fight when they otherwise wouldn’t have fought because they thought there was no hope. You might notice the great efforts, the government, system, regime, whatever you want to call it, the efforts the system goes to destroy hope, right? Because if there is no hope, then the men of the society being affected by an enemy, by an aggressor, will not fight!

 

And I think one of the most clear or prominent ways the system tries to destroy hope is through what we have come to understand as “humiliation ritual”.

 

[06:34]

 

Now, it’s important to understand what that is the point of humiliation ritual is to kill your hope. The point of turning your children into transvestites is to kill your hope! The point of feminism, destroying the family, it’s all to make you think that there’s no hope. And you have to understand that the amount of effort they’re putting in to try to humiliate you, it’s such a great effort that we’ve come to understand it as a daily ritual! Something that we see on a daily basis.

 

The reason for that is because they’re scared of us! They know that if they don’t consistently apply that humiliation tactic, if they don’t consistently destroy hope, we begin to regain hope. We start to fight and we win! So always be hopeful! It’s your duty as a member of this community, our international nationalist community, as ridiculous as that sounds, we’re one race all around the world, and remembering always to maintain that hope within yourself, authentically believe it yourself, that will inspire hope in others. And I think that’s the primary duty of all of us here!

 

[applause]

 

I really am a little bit rusty here, aren’t I, eh?

 

Earlier this year, I read a curious book*. And this will be on the subject of hope as well, I suppose. In this book was a concept called the “fitness effect”. And to explain it simply, what the fitness effect is, it’s very anthropological, meaning we understand that anthropology is the study of organisms and how they develop and evolve. The book is written by a man, David Kilcullen, who was an Australian soldier who I believe ended up working in counter espionage with the Americans, or perhaps counter-terrorism.

 

But the book, this particular part of the book is very interesting. It made me think of the quote, by Christ, “love your enemies”, because it made me begin to understand and appreciate that it’s good to have enemies and it’s good to have pressure put on you. The reason for that is because the right amount of pressure consistently causes an organism to grow stronger. Because it has to grow stronger to deal with the consistent stress.

 

Think about if you’re in the gym, lifting weights, right? If you’re putting yourself under that constant stress, then your muscles have to get stronger in order to deal with it. If you are under too much stress in any one period of time, you risk injuring yourself. If there’s no stress at all, that’s even worse, in my opinion, because you become stagnant or even get weaker.

 

But the fitness effects, especially when considering communities, political groups, is when you’re consistently under that pressure from an external source, from an enemy, you’re forced to adapt, you’re forced to get stronger, to learn new tactics and strategies, such as you know, Mark does putting together these conferences. He’s had problems in the past, and he’s had to develop new strategies to make sure the conferences still go ahead. This is an example of the fitness effect applied to a community group. Let’s put our hands together for Mark, by the way. He’s done a great job!

 

[applause]

 

So the whole point of the speech, I suppose, was to understand that hope is your duty, to be patient when speaking to other people, to use authenticity to inspire belief and hope in others.

 

And there’s not a lot more for me to say, really. I didn’t have much prepared, so I’m sorry if I’m disappointing you, but that’s it.

 

Thank you for inviting me to your beautiful country!

 

[long loud applause]

 

[11:04]

 

[* The Dragons and the Snakes: How the Rest Learned to Fight the West 92019) by David Kilcullen. A counterintuitive examination into how, and what, opponents of the West have learned during the last quarter-century of conflict.]

 

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 11/1/2024 = 10)

@MrVans
4 hours ago
quick, but straight to the point. great work blair!

5
0

@PureNomad
4 hours ago
A jaw like an anvil :rofl: :joy: :rofl:

5
0
Hitlers Ghost
4 hours ago
he’s a fine representative example of the White anglo male

4
0
Hide replies
renunciate
3 hours ago
As a white, Anglo, female…I concur. A fine example indeed.

3
0

@MrRoboto
3 hours ago
Very well said. I appreciate the brevity and of a concise, authentic delivery.

3
0
renunciate
4 hours ago
Good on you, Blair.

3
0
Dawn Browning
4 hours ago
You’ve done us proud, Our Blair. Next time I see you out & about I’ll come and shake your hand again.

3
0

@AryanObservations
3 hours ago
Hail victory. We adore you Australians. This time the world.

2
0

@BMC1488
3 hours ago
Blair is indeed a proper Aryan Chad.

2
0
renunciate
3 hours ago
It’s easier to win people over when you’re making them feel accepted, that they belong with us.

2
0

==========================

See Also

top

/>

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Aaron Spreadbury: So, with that all said, I can introduce our first speaker. Our first speaker is someone that we all know and love. She has become quite famous for her ability to multitask, not only raising multiple children, but running a business at the same time, all while filling the role of Patriotic Alternative’s deputy leader. We don’t know how she does it, but she takes it all in her stride nonetheless, and with a smile to boot.

 

Even with her husband Sam, currently in prison for Thought Crime, she has proven to be an exemplar of our values, striking off a daily storm of troubles that serves only to cement the respect that this wonderful woman so rightfully commands. So give a cheer for the Queen of British nationalism, it’s Laura Melia!

 

[loud applause]

 

[01:06]

 

Laura Towler: Thank you so much! I am losing my voice, so I’m hoping it lasts throughout the whole speech. But if my voice goes, I might try and get Sam’s dad up here to finish my speech for me. No pressure! [chuckling]

 

What a year it’s been! I’ve never wanted to give a speech as much as I’ve wanted to give this one. There’s so much that I want to say and so much that I want to get on the record. I’ve actually been writing this speech in my head all year, and there’s so many people that I want to hold to account.

 

What I’m saying is my patience has finally reached its limit. And there’s a reason that I chose to wear a dress with lightning bolts on it today.

 

When I stood up here last year at Patriotic Alternative 2023 conference, I didn’t know that within a year my husband, Sam Melia, would be in prison. I didn’t know that I’d have another daughter who I delivered by myself, without her father there. A daughter who, now six months old, doesn’t recognise her dad because she only gets 90 minutes with him a week. I didn’t know that I’d be battling against counter-terrorism, judges, barristers, probation and social services. I didn’t know that I’d be testifying in court and debating a King’s Council barrister who specialises in murder, serious violence and terrorism on the topic of Sir Oswald Mosley.

 

I didn’t know that my husband would be banned from seeing his children, speaking to his children, viewing photographs of his children, and even speaking about his children. I didn’t know that children’s services would be coming into my home and assessing my husband and I on whether we’re a risk to our children.

 

I didn’t know that my husband would be classed as such a dangerous criminal, A criminal with a high likelihood of committing, quote, unquote, “serious harm”. That he would be denied home detention curfew and would have to serve his full custodial sentence behind bars.

 

But here we are. I don’t say any of this for sympathy. I say it because I want you all to know how the British state treats political dissidents in 2024. Being the deputy leader of Patriotic Alternative, I’m lucky enough to have a platform right now. I have a stage, a microphone, 200 people in front of me and a very talented media team who are recording my every word. And it will then be uploaded to the Internet where thousands more people will hear it.

 

So I’m going to use this platform to call some people out. I’m going to hold those who are responsible for that big list of things I just mentioned to account during this speech. I’m going to reveal everything they’ve done, secrets I’ve kept until now, and the things that they don’t want you to know. Throughout this speech, I’m going to be talking to the various groups who have done us wrong.

 

Now, I understand that I’ve started off pretty heavy there. I’ve gone a little bit Liam Neeson, [chuckling] but the tone of this speech will not be negative. It’s been a tough year for us. We’ve fought battles and some we’ve won and some we’ve lost. But we remain optimistic. One does not lash out this hard at somebody who is irrelevant. And we’ve all heard the phrase about the flak and the target.

 

Patriotic Alternative has every single Avenue cut off for us. We’re banned from all social media websites. We’re not allowed to register as a political party. We’re not allowed bank accounts or payment processes. We’re constantly lied about by politicians, academics and the press. We’re spoken about non-stop. They keep making documentaries about us, but we’re not allowed a right of reply. They won’t let Mark Collett on TV to defend us.

 

Yet still, we are Britain’s largest and most active nationalist organisation! [applause] And that tells you that despite the struggles that we face, we offer something that the public want. We are truly over the target!

 

And today I’m going to be telling you how desperate the state is to stop the rise of nationalism! So let’s begin.

 

Three and a half years ago, my husband, Sam Melia, was arrested by Counter-Terrorism for three offences. One terrorism offence, and two public order offences. He was taken to a police station while they raided our home. And as soon as they got him to the police station, they immediately dropped the terrorism offence and one of the public order offences.

 

The public order offence, which remained active, was for:

 

“Distributing written material with the intention to stir up racial hatred.”

 

And this offence related to Sam publishing an archive of stickers on the Internet that people could download, print off, and put up in public places. The project was called the Hundred-Handers.

 

[06:12]

 

Would Counter-Terrorism have got the warrant to arrest Sam and raid our home without those first two offences? I don’t think so. and we’ve spoken to numerous legal professionals this year, and we’ve learnt that when it comes to Counter-Terrorism, they just get whatever they want. They hold out a piece of paper, it gets signed, no evidence needed.

 

So they made out like Sam was some sort of dangerous terrorist in order to get into our home and look through our lives. Counter Terrorism, however, failed!

 

Now, that might not make much sense because my husband’s currently in prison, but believe me, they never really cared about the stickers. They had all the evidence for the stickers back when they arrested Sam in spring 2021, but they did nothing with it for two years.

 

During those two years, they instead desperately tried to find something more serious that they could pin on Sam. They were passed over false information from Hope Not Hate. Sam’s alleged links to National Action turned out to be false. There was no evidence for it. They tried the good cop, bad cop routine. They tried making Sam’s life hell by giving him extremely strict bail conditions and even saying to him on one occasion in front of me:

 

“This ends when you want it to end. Give us what we want!”

 

They tried getting me on side against Sam, attempting to influence me into nudging Sam and making him admit to something that he hadn’t done. And they threatened Sam with 10 years:

 

“Your wife’s pregnant, isn’t she, Sam? Give us what you want, or you’ll miss the first decade of your child’s life. Give us what we want!”

 

So what did they want? Well, from start to finish, Counter Terrorism spent five years on this investigation. Five years and millions of pounds of taxpayers money. That kind of expenditure has to be justified. Having looked through every element of Sam’s life, his home, his devices, every conversation that he’d ever had, they found no crime.

 

But what they did have was something that they hung onto desperately with the hope that it might be their golden ticket. A device, an encrypted hard drive that they couldn’t get into. They tried every dirty tactic in the book in order to get Sam to hand over that password. But Sam never spoke. He no commented every question, he refused to sign anything and he gave away no passwords. Now, this device that apparently had really bad stuff on it, Counter Terrorism actually never got into it.

 

And I’m going to reveal right now for the first time what is on that device. And I know Counter Terrorism will be watching this speech. It isn’t terrorism, it isn’t anything illegal. It’s nothing scary, it’s actually nothing political at all! It’s our customer data for Grandma Towler’s.

 

[audience laughs]

 

So when I say that your data is secure, when you shop at grammatowlers.co.uk! [applause] We take your privacy very seriously. So Counter Terrorism had failed. They had the stickers, but they didn’t care about the stickers and they never got into this device. So they dropped off the surface of the earth and for two years they went quiet.

 

And then we contacted them. We contacted them for two reasons.

 

Firstly, because they had all of our stuff, our computers, our phones, our devices, my PlayStation 4. They had over 30 of our items. But mainly we contacted them because they’d released Sam under investigation. They didn’t close the file, and we had it hanging over us. By now we had a daughter who was one and a half years old and we just wanted to put an end to it and move on with our lives. So Sam contacted them and said:

 

“Make a decision. Charge me or close the file.”

 

And that week, they charged Sam for the stickers:

 

“Distributing written material with the intention to stir up racial hatred. Let’s give it a shot. We’ve spent enough time and money on it!”

 

I imagine, is what they said.

 

Does Sam regret contacting them? No, because it’s now over. And sometimes it’s better to know something than to deal with “what if” forever.

 

So now I’d like to speak to the first group of people that I will be addressing in this speech. Dear Counter Terrorism and West Yorkshire Police, bearing in mind the amount of resources that you wasted on my husband, I can only assume that we’ve solved terrorism in this country! I don’t know how you can sleep at night when you didn’t find what you were looking for, when you followed your lead but found no evidence of crime, you should have closed the file. You took away two years from a man’s life, a daddy away from two little girls, all because you couldn’t handle the fact that your investigation had failed. You utter scumbags!

 

[loud applause]

 

This is not justice! Justice would be looking at all the evidence and then coming to a conclusion based on that evidence, not searching for evidence to match the narrative that you’ve already written, and discarding any evidence that proves you wrong. Is this what you imagined you’d be doing when you made the decision to fight terrorism? Raiding the home of a young family because the father warned about mass immigration?

 

But perhaps you already know all of this. Perhaps this is why you could never look me in the eye at Sam’s trial. I would say that now you’ve stopped faffing about with stickers, you could go and catch some real criminals. But we all know you have no intention of doing that. Too busy arresting people for social media posts, prancing around in pride parades and painting your fingernails! Is it any wonder that only 5.7% of crimes are solved in the United Kingdom? In the eyes of the British public, you are a disgrace!

 

[applause]

 

[12:29]

 

Fast forward to today and we all know how this story ended. There was a trial at the start of this year. Sam pleaded not guilty, but he was found guilty of two offences by jury vote and he was sentenced to two years in prison.

 

Sam’s first offence was, as I said:

 

“Distributing written material with the intention to stir up racial hatred.”

 

And it was in relation to Sam uploading an archive of 310 stickers on the Internet that people could download, print off and put up in public places. The second offence was:

 

“Racially aggravated criminal damage.”

 

Now, this offence is usually for things like if you set fire to a mosque or if you kick over some jewish Headstones, but in Sam’s case, it was for stickers on lampposts. Stickers that peel off and leave the lamppost completely undamaged. The equivalent of a lost dog poster. Every single lamppost and bus stop in Leeds city centre is covered in stickers, some of them with rather aggressive and violent messages on them, especially the ones directed towards us.

 

But of course, the police aren’t pursuing any of those or even calling them “criminal damage”. It’s only criminal damage when it suits them. So what did the stickers say?

 

Well, there were 310 stickers in total, and they covered a variety of topics. So things like immigration, health, education, the media, the establishment, academia and art, plus other things. Only 13% of the stickers, so just over 1 in 10 were about other races, religions, ethnicities or things like diversity, multiculturalism. You may have seen some of the stickers in the press, and I want to be completely honest about the full archive of stickers. I’ve seen people say online that Sam was sent to prison because he said “White Lives Matter”, and in a way, he was, because the judge told the jury that:

 

“You have to consider the full archive of 310 stickers when making your decision. You can’t just cherry pick one or two bad stickers.”

 

None of the stickers encouraged violence. None of them used any racial slurs.

 

So let’s take a look at some of the most “offensive” ones. “Labour loves Muslim rape gangs”. I mean, you did promote Naz Shah to the Shadow Minister of State for Women and Equality after she tweeted:

 

“Those abused girls in Rotherham and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths for the good of diversity.”

 

You could say that Sam was telling the truth!

 

Another sticker said:

 

“We will be a minority by 2066.”

 

This is a fact.

 

In fact, it’s likely more than 2066, earlier than 2066 now. And this was a prediction by Professor David Coleman, one of the leading demographers in the country.

 

Another sticker said:

 

“There is a war on Whites.”

 

And you’ve literally proved Sam’s point with this one, with your treatment of him. A White man advocating for White people:

 

“Terrorist, extremist!”

 

Small hats, big problems! I mean, they do wear small hats! [chuckling].

 

During the trial, and after Sam was sentenced, Sam gained international attention from the public and the media. The reason being there are elements of Sam’s case that really made it stood out.

 

Firstly, the prosecution said that all 310 stickers were legal. So he was convicted for his intentions behind legal speech.

 

Secondly, the prosecution said:

 

“The truth is no defense in court.”

 

So they openly said:

 

“It doesn’t matter if every single sticker is true, you’re still not allowed to say it.”

 

The truth is no defence in court, is probably the most Orwellian statement I’ve ever heard in my life! You’re not allowed to tell the truth! And they’ll say:

 

“You can tell the truth, you just can’t use it to incite hatred.”

 

What a load of nonsense! You should be able to tell the truth, full stop. Let people make up their own minds. If you say that the White British are going to be a minority and that’s a good thing, you’re allowed to say that. But if you say that the White British are going to be a minority and that’s a bad thing! Whoa! Hate speech! The truth is no defense.

 

How can you win a case where the truth is no defense?

 

The third reason why Sam Garnered a lot of attention is that the prosecution admitted that no crimes had been committed as a result of the stickers. Zero, was their answer. And the legal jargon that they used during the trial said:

 

“Was likely to stir up racial hatred.”

 

Well, it wasn’t! It didn’t happen over five days. You said it didn’t happen.

 

And the fourth reason why Sam’s case got so much attention and outraged so many people is because no evidence was ever provided by the prosecution of Sam intending to incite racial hatred. I know that sounds mental, but if you attended the trial, you will know that to be true. Not a single piece of evidence!

 

Just silly things, like a funny picture of Hitler. My book on my bedside table, Tomorrow We Live by Sir Oswald Mosley. I got up in court and I testified that the book was mine. And I even added the receipts of when I bought it from before me and Sam got together to the evidence pack.

 

I remember standing on the witness stand and having this debate with the prosecuting barrister about the book. A book that none of them have read, but they entered it into evidence. It’s not a book about race. It’s a critique of the Parliamentary system in Britain in the 1930s. It doesn’t mention race because Britain was 99% White back then. But we’re having this conversation about this book, which is apparently evidence of Sam’s intentions. It’s just so surreal and so wrong on so many levels! I just wish I’d have asked the barrister in the court:

 

“Have you read this book, then?”

 

Though I doubt it would have made much of a difference to that jury, and I doubt he would have answered the question.

 

[18:23]

 

Sam, on the other hand, had lots of evidence of his intentions. Measures that he’d taken to ensure that the project didn’t cause any problems for anyone, measures to stop people from misusing the project, and every private and public message that he’d ever sent discussing the project where he mentioned his intentions.

 

When you lose a trial like this, you go back over it in your mind and you wonder if you should have done things differently, answered questions differently.

 

But the fact is, on paper, we won! We presented evidence of Sam’s intentions. They did not! If you’d have entered all the evidence into a computer, it would have come back and said that Sam was not guilty. An intelligent and brave jury would have voted not guilty. If 12 random people from in this room were on that jury, you would have got the correct answer. But the jury that day didn’t.

 

We can blame the establishment all we want for what happened, but ultimately Sam is in prison right now because a jury of Sam’s so-called “peers” decided that he was guilty. And when they came back with the guilty verdict, we were all shocked. I don’t just mean that we were shocked. Sam’s friends who want to believe that he’s innocent, but everybody was shocked! The judge was visibly shocked! And after dismissing the jury and the public gallery, he outright said that he did not agree with the verdict.

 

And the prosecution were shocked. We heard them talking during one of the breaks and they said that they didn’t think that they could win the case.

 

When the jury came back with that verdict, I went through a cycle of grief. At first I was shocked and confused and then angry and then upset. I didn’t check social media for a couple of days because I thought it would anger and upset me. And if the jury came back with that verdict, surely they’re representative of the British public, right? I didn’t want to see people gloating about it or saying bad things about Sam.

 

And for a brief moment I thought, what is the point? Are our people even worthy saving? Why don’t Sam and I just move out to the country, buy a little fixer upper and get away from it all? Why risk everything for these people?

 

And then after a couple of days, I looked online and to my surprise, I saw the massive amount of support that Sam had! I’m not exaggerating when I say that around 98% of the posts I’ve seen about Sam are on his side. People wanted to interview me about Sam. Everybody was outraged! And he’s still spoken about today every single day. Seriously. Go to Twitter, search “Sam Melia”, every single day!

 

And I realised that we’re not the minority. The jury are the minority. I don’t know if they were too cowardly to defend a so-called “racist”, especially with there being a couple of ethnic minorities on the jury. But I do know that if our people don’t have the confidence or the means to stand up for our people, that is not a sign for us to tap out. That’s a sign for us to work harder.

 

Dear jury, I have no idea what happened in that deliberation room and perhaps I never will. How on earth you came to a guilty verdict regarding Sam’s intentions when no evidence of his intentions was ever presented and 87% of the stickers weren’t even about other races, I’ll never understand! I felt many different emotions towards you this year. Anger, sadness and confusion. But the one overriding feeling that I felt towards you is disgust! Disgust that not even one of you had the balls to stand up for a man’s right to speak! Because that’s the liberal mind, isn’t it? Avoiding a minor unpleasantness now so that a major unpleasantness becomes unavoidable later!

 

[Loud applause]

 

Many may disagree with my stance here, but I do not forgive you and I never will. It is because of people like you that we’re in this mess. People are so scared of words like “racist” that the mass scale rape of children gets covered up and terrorists backpacks don’t get checked and that results in 22 people dead.

 

Sam has more courage and backbone than you ever will!

 

[Loud applause]

 

I hope you’ve read the public’s comments about you. I hope it keeps you up at night. And if you are ever affected by the issues that Sam raised in your future, will you remember that you condemned Sam to prison for looking out for you?

 

Now, I mentioned earlier that the judge explicitly said that he didn’t agree with the guilty verdict. And he was actually a very good judge throughout the trial. He seemed to like Sam and he really did not like the prosecution.

 

However, a month after the trial and verdict, when we came back for the sentencing, he was a different man. George Galloway had just been elected and Rishi Sunak, who was the Prime Minister at the time, had given a speech on the Friday about the rise of anti-semitism in Britain. We were supposed to meet for sentencing on the Monday morning, but we received a message saying that it had been rescheduled to the afternoon. The judge had been called somewhere.

 

That afternoon the judge was like a different man. He wasn’t joking and smiling anymore. He looked like he wanted to cry. And he gave his sentencing comments. And suddenly Sam’s crime was all about jews and anti-semitism! His trial hadn’t been about that. It was mainly about grooming, gangs, race demographics. But the judge made all these comments saying things like:

 

“Since the 1930s, there’s a real threat of anti-semitism on our streets, because there had been all these pro-Palestinian marches.”

 

He sentenced Sam to two years in prison for stickers that he created in 2019 because of Marches that happened in 2024. “Sensitive social climate” is the phrase they used. Sam does not have a time machine and he does not have a crystal ball. The judge also said that the sentence was to act as a deterrent to others with the same beliefs.

 

[24:46]

 

Dear Judge, I don’t know who got to you, but I know that somebody did. You are a liar! You lied continuously throughout your sentencing remarks. For example, you said that Sam had an obsessive interest in Oswald Mosley. The only mention of Mosley throughout the entire trial was my book! And you know that. Liar!

 

The sentence may not have been your decision, but you made it nonetheless. You took a little girl’s daddy away from her because he was worried about immigration. And I want you to know the result of your decision. For a while, whenever somebody knocked on the door, my daughter would say, “daddy”. It broke my heart when we went to visit Sam one day when she picked up her bug catcher, thinking that she could go and catch bugs with her dad. And I had to tell her:

 

“We can’t because he’s not allowed to get up off his chair.”

 

I will never, ever forgive you for the upset you caused my daughter.

 

My husband’s legacy will be that of a loving family man who put his head above the parapet to create a better nation for our people. Your legacy will be that of a traitor! Tough on patriots, and soft on paedophiles. In the last two weeks, 30 paedophiles, all found with category eight images, have walked free from courts across the UK. These same judges will send you to prison for posting stickers, sharing books, making podcasts, throwing a traffic cone, or even defending yourself against a police dog. It is a badge of honour to stand in opposition to you!

 

[Applause]

 

Once Sam was convicted, we then had to deal with probation for the first time. You know the midwits that you encounter on Twitter who think that they’re really smart and they just make these dumb arguments that you’ve heard a million times before? That’s probation. Let’s listen to some of the arguments that they’ve put forward in the last month:

 

“What does it even mean to be British anyway?”

 

“Why does it matter if we become a minority? Maybe we deserve it because of colonialism.”

 

“We’ve always been a nation of immigrants!”

 

“The Windrush generation came here to rebuild our country after the war.”

 

[Laughter]

 

It was probation who classified Sam as a PPRC, a Person Posing Risk to Children, and passed over information to Children Services, which kicked off the assessment that we had to have, regarding whether we are a risk to our children. They told Children Services that I also had extreme views, even though I was nothing to do with Sam’s offence. And when I asked them for some evidence of my extreme views, they sent me two things.

 

The first thing was the first paragraph, copied and pasted from Patriotic Alternative Wikipedia page. You know Wikipedia that anybody can edit. Wikipedia that you’re not even allowed to reference in a school essay? That was the first piece of evidence of me having extreme views.

 

And the second piece of evidence of me having extreme views is this.

 

Now, bear with me, because if you think this doesn’t make sense, it’s because it doesn’t. So seven years Before Patriotic Alternative were formed, Professor David Coleman, who was the Professor of Demography at the University of Oxford, made a prediction that based on current trends, the White British ethnic group would be a minority in the United Kingdom by 2066. And when he gave this prediction, he didn’t class black people and Asian people as White British. And then seven years in the future, Patriotic Alternative was formed. And I’m part of Patriotic Alternative, so apparently that means I have extreme views. Does it even make sense? So because he didn’t class black and Asian people as White, that means I’m an “extremist”!

 

They’re completely useless and they’re in charge! These people hold the power over Sam’s future.

 

So we had to do this assessment because of Sam’s “racist and offensive” views and books to see if we were indoctrinating our children. I can honestly say that whenever my 2 year old chooses a bedtime story book, she’s never chosen Mein Kampf! [laughter] It doesn’t quite have the same appeal to it as Rabbit Snap and Postman Bear. But we had to do this assessment.

 

And the people who covered up the mass scale abuse, torture, rape and murder of children. And I was set with my husband to see if he’s a risk to children because he warned about the mass scale abuse, rape, torture and murder of children!

 

To cut a long story short, because I could go on about this for a while, but to my surprise, Children’s Services sided with me and Sam and they said that we were no risk.

 

[Applause]

 

Sam was allowed to see his children again. Probation recently just tried to book in another assessment with Children’s Services for when Sam is released. And Children’s Services told them:

 

“No.”

 

They said:

 

“Leave them alone, they’re good people.”

 

[Applause]

 

These room temperature IQ morons who work in Probation will be responsible for Sam attending weekly sessions when he is released so that he can have his views realigned. They’re so out of their depth, it’s untrue. And when you engage with them, there’s this constant narrative that Sam is:

 

“Dangerous, Sam is a bad person, Sam is an extremist!”

 

We all know Sam and that’s not the Sam that we know. And you just want to shake them and you want to say:

 

“Do you actually believe this or are you just going along with it for the sake of your job? Do you actually believe that a man should get a two year custodial sentence for his alleged intentions behind legal, truthful speech?”

 

[30:47]

 

Dear Probation, I just find it so laughable that you think you’re going to align Sam’s views. The arguments that you put forward are not clever. They’re not making us think. They’re stupid and tedious, and we’ve heard them a million times before. When you talk about Sam being “dangerous”, when you use the phrase “serious harm”, do you really believe that or are you just going along with it because you’re told to?

 

Because Sam may be behind bars right now, but he’s a freer man than any of you. He told the truth! He made a stand! He has a clear conscience and he can hold his head up high! Can the same be said for you?

 

[Applause]

 

So I reached the end of my speech. One day in the future, accounts will be settled. We will remember the names of all those who did us wrong. And a time will come when they sit in front of our judges and they answer legally and peacefully for their actions. Until that day comes, the silent majority are becoming less silent. Your deterrents have only angered and energized people further.

 

You wanted to make Sam into an example. And in a way you did. But not the example that you wanted. You made him into a hero! A champion of free speech! And you showed the world how fragile, weak and anti-White you are! The British state terrified of a man and his stickers!

 

You only have power over people when they still have something to lose. Take away their freedom and their family and their voice and their concerns and don’t be surprised when these people are no longer under your control. Your grip is loosening. When you go after somebody for nothing, it doesn’t send a message saying:

 

“I better watch what I say.”

 

It sends a message saying:

 

“It doesn’t matter what I say, they will come for me anyway!”

 

Somebody left a message on my Telegram channel the other day and I really liked it. So I wanted to read it out in my speech. His name is John:

 

“Every entity of the anti-White bureaucratic UK state are nothing but utter scum! The whole ZOG system that is infested with corrupt to the core spiteful mutants needs to come crashing down!”

 

I could not agree more! Once victory is ours, never forget what these people have done. Hard times create strong men. We’ve never had our beliefs tested so harshly. But here we are. Patriotic Alternative, five years on, standing strong, defiant, telling the truth like we first did five years ago. Uncompromising! Unforgiving and driven unconditionally by a love for our people. Our activists are truly the best of the best!

 

When I stood up here last year at Patriotic Alternative 2023 conference, I didn’t know that the British state would show us all how weak, fragile and desperate they are by sending a man to prison for legal, truthful speech. I didn’t know that millions of people world-wide would see and agree with Sam’s stickers. Thank you for the publicity, by the way. I didn’t know that the whole of the political Right and even parts of the Left would unite on an issue. Something that I want to see more of and Sam’s story would reach Alex Jones, Tommy Robinson UK Column, Britain First, Spiked, GB News, and even Elon Musk.

 

I didn’t know that parts of the system, Children’s Services, would side with us and that we could get reports changed if we refused to accept the labels they put on us and if we fight back with facts and professionalism.

 

I didn’t know that the British public was so mad that they would riot up and down the country in response to the impact of mass immigration.

 

I didn’t know that email campaigns and pressure groups worked.

 

I didn’t know that the Overton Window would move so far in our direction that MPs like Nigel Farage now have talking points that sound like a 2016 Mark Collett YouTube video.

 

And I didn’t know that Patriotic Alternative would find our niche and that through advocacy, pressure and activism, we could have an instant impact on our people.

 

Lastly, I didn’t know how blessed I was to have such a wonderful community around me. And I’d personally like to thank you all for the support that you’ve shown me and Sam this year. Sam will be leaving prison in two months. He will then stay at an approved premises for at least six months. And he’s on licence until the first of March, 2026.

 

Believe me, when that day comes, there’s a lot he’s going to want to say. Freedom for Sam Melia and freedom for all political prisoners!

 

Thank you.

 

[35:46]

 

[Long, loud, standing applause]

 

[36:15]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 10/28/2024 = 16)

rosco1314
1 day ago
brilliant speech laura as always……..hope the big man is home soon

22
0

@chrislaycocky
1 day ago
Best speech this year !

19
0

@GazChamberz
1 day ago
They can call us all the names they want but they’ll never call us liars!

14
0

@WingITprod
1 day ago
Only the soulless antiWhite haters could watch this and not be swayed to sympathize. War has a way of taking fathers away from their babies. This war is waged by the leaders upon their own people.

11
0
Spooky Kermie
23 hours ago
God bless Sam. God bless you, Laura. God bless PA, one and all. o7

8
0

@BritishGammon
22 hours ago
Laura has comprehensively described and exposed the anti-White system right there!
And spoken right from the heart.
Amazing speech.

8
0
Dawn Browning
1 day ago

7
0

@chambleth5
17 hours ago
I regret not being able to like this hard enough.

6
0

@filled_soda
8 hours ago
A dress with lightning bolts. Unfathomably based, Laura.

5
0
Htrac
10 hours ago
“Sam may be behind bars right now, but he is a freer man than any of you. He told the truth, he made a stand, he has a clear conscience and he can hold his head up high. Can the same be said for you?”
Fantastic. Reminds me of Ursula Haverbeck smiling as she leaves court.

5
0

@cheflad
17 hours ago
Great Speech.

5
0

@RalphBlunsom
11 hours ago
If I could choose one piece of evidence from the last ten years to prove the treachery of the British state, it would be this speech. And yet at the same time, it proves the goodness of one English woman.
Well done, Laura. You make us proud.

4
0
ItsOkToBeANationalist
12 hours ago
Fantastic! I’ve shared this with semi-based people

4
0

@drbrown
6 hours ago
the british goverment is demonic. their minions will fall

3
0
Spooky Kermie
7 hours ago
“How can you win a case where the truth is no defense?”

3
0
KarlBurton
10 hours ago
What did the jury look like ?

1
0
Hide replies
KarlBurton
10 hours ago
Never mind

1
0
my heyoo heyoo
2 hours ago(edited)
Vengeance will be ours! Vengeance for Sam and for Millions of us both the dead and alive

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

A Message to the Anti-White System – Laura Towler’s 2024 PA Conference Speech – Oct 19, 2024 – Transcript

Patriotic Alternative – Hope is Our Duty – Blair Cottrell’s 2024 PA Conference Speech – Oct 19, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

 

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 1 – Intro – Jun 29, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 2 – Jul 6, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 03 with Paul Fromm – Jul 13, 2024 – Transcript

The Flipside with Monika – Ep 08 with Alfred Schaefer – Aug 17, 2024 – Transcript

Monika Schaefer – The Flipside with Monika – Ep 15 with Jürgen Neumann on Ernst Zündel – Oct 12, 2024 – Transcript

 

 

 

/>

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: Decided to just go live because Thomas should be here in any second. Jacob is actually coming over, so we’re going to have Tom and then Jacob on the show this evening. There’s no Blair. Blair, as you might have seen on social media, is in Britain right now, actually. He spoke at the Patriotic Alternative conference last week, and he’s doing a bit of tourism.

 

Here’s Thomas. We are live. How are you?

 

Thomas Sewell: What’s up?

 

Joel Davis: But yeah, Blair couldn’t make it this evening because he’s traveling. But he’ll be on the show next week, and I’m sure he’ll have a lot of interesting things to say about his time in Britain. So that’ll be interesting to get his takes next week. And Jacob, as I said, we’ll be over in about 20 minutes or so, and he’ll join me here on the show.

 

But in the meantime. Yeah, obviously we had another big activism on Tuesday afternoon here in Melbourne. And maybe we’ll try and hold our balls until Jacob gets here and not discuss it so that we can discuss it with Jacob, because he’ll be here in 20 minutes.

 

So in the meantime, we were discussed on the news again tonight, but they were discussing something else. Some of the boys up in the Riverina chapter, which are the guys that are kind of based near the New South Wales, Victoria border, near Corowa, where we did our last activism a couple weeks ago. They went back to the town over the weekend and they distributed flyers. Jacob wrote up a flyer just talking about the problems with immigration and how White people need to come together. And just a little link to our website and everything. They were distributed.

 

And also we printed off just a few paragraphs from the Noticer dot News article on what happened in Corowa. And we put that with The Noticer headline, and then a link to the full article at the bottom. And they were distributed by the boys up there. I don’t know how many they handed out, but they got around. They made sure that they were distributed around.

 

And anyway, it was big enough story, apparently, that we handed out leaflets that it has to be on the news this evening. So we can’t stop getting publicity at the moment. I thought we’d watch this. It’s kind of interesting. Obviously, they’re trying to make us look bad, but we could analyze this.

 

Newsreader: (Nick Hose) The White supremacist group who clashed with police in Melbourne is increasing the stakes on the border. The neo-Nazis have now become a letterbox drop in Corowa and trying to recruit more men in black!

Reporter: (Jacqueline Stanley) Twenty neo-Nazis driven out of Melbourne by force. This clash erupting in the city yesterday.

NSN: Australia for the White man! The rest must go!

Reporter: (Jacqueline Stanley) All the while, a more sinister campaign flew under the radar and into letterboxes on the border.

Corowa Resident: (male) No, we’re not fans.

Corowa Resident: (female) I got it, I screwed it up. In the bin. That’s [words unclear] makes me. We don’t need it.

Corowa Resident: (female) It was just the language. The language was so unpleasant.

Reporter: (Jacqueline Stanley) The Noticer are peppered with hateful phrases like “imported scabs” claiming the nation is “infested with diversity”. Flyers quietly slid into the letterboxes of Corowa residents.

Cheryl Cook: (Federation Mayor) Totally unfair in the Corowa community, and rightly so, they’re enraged. They’re upset, and I might add, fearful too.

Chris Minns: (NSW Premier) I think it’s disgusting! And the people that are distributing that appalling literature should take a long, hard look at themselves.

Reporter: (Jacqueline Stanley) The group’s henchmen put one at every house on this street, exactly a week after they stormed the town and was sent packing after this stunt at the War Memorial. Their conspiracy that Australia is flooded with so-called non-White workers. But in Corowa, all workers are welcome!

Corowa Resident: (female) The town is trying to embrace them. Yes, they might buy things and send them home, but that’s their prerogative.

Reporter: (Jacqueline Stanley) New South Wales police are well aware of this recent development and are monitoring the situation closely. But the group have also been targeting children, with a group of school kids approached by a man in all black who tried to indoctrinate them, too.

Corowa Resident: (female) Neo-Nazis need to know they’re not welcome in Corowa.

Cheryl Cook: (Federation Mayor) We don’t want this in Australia. It’s very unAustralian.

Reporter: (Jacqueline Stanley) Jacqueline Stanley, Seven News.

 

Joel Davis: What’s unAustralian importing a bunch of non-Australians! That’s pretty [word unclear]

 

Thomas Sewell: [laughing] Ahh! Yes, it’s a “conspiracy” that we’re spreading. That Australia is being flooded with non-White workers. This is “the conspiracy” that we’re spreading. It’s a conspiracy, you see?

 

It is a conspiracy! They’re correct. The elites are conspiring to replace us. That is true.

 

Joel Davis: I wouldn’t put it as a conspiracy because it’s not. Conspiracy implies that they’re secretly organising it. They’re openly organising it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, that’s true.

 

Joel Davis: There was an article in the Border Mail, which is the biggest newspaper distributed in that area near where Corowa is, in those border towns along the Murray [River]. And it was written about this, about these leaflets. They were distributed on the weekend and they only discussed it on the news tonight, probably after we made the news last night, they decided to pick it up as a national story.

 

And in that article, they quoted a local councillor who was saying that:

 

“Well, we have to bring in foreigners to go and work at the pig farm because there just isn’t enough White people, locals that want to work there.”

 

Apparently. So he openly admitted that we were correct. And then he was saying that he wants JBS to come out and make a statement, and he wants the council to vote on a statement saying that they support bringing in foreign workers. And that he’s working within the council to create an official, you know, council resolution that they support replacing the people of the town.

 

So we’re conspiracy theorists! Meanwhile, the literal local government is openly stating that they’re doing it and that it’s a great thing!

 

So it’s not happening, but it is happening, and it’s great, that it’s happening! All at the same time.

 

[06:25]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. They just interviewed a bunch of people that just told the media what they wanted to hear. I mean, no one had any substance. Like, what was that lady saying? Like:

 

“Oh, yeah, so they’re here and they buy some things and they send them home. But that’s their prerogative.”

 

It’s like, what does that even mean? What are you talking about? And they managed to find one normal looking White guy that’s like:

 

“Oh, I’m not a supporter.”

 

It’s like:

 

“Okay, he’s not a supporter.”

 

All right, is he a supporter of the town going from 2% brown to 50% brown? Is he a supporter of that? Did anyone ask that? So it’s always loaded questions. They don’t ask the correct questions. Well, they ask the correct questions for their narrative.

 

We know that the locals of Corowa are in support of us. A big percentage. I can’t say which exact percentage, but a lot of these people don’t want to go in front of the news, because they can see every single facet of the system, the government, the media, and a lot of the locals have told us they’re genuinely afraid of JBS. They’re afraid to lose their jobs, if they haven’t already. They’re afraid for their family members. They’re afraid for the amount of connection that JBS has to all the other businesses, in the area.

 

That’s new. We’re getting pop ups now. [chat comment]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I can. I can make things pop up.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, and that’s a good point as well. Dreamweaver says:

 

“Interviewed a bunch of Boomers who aren’t affected economically by these third worlders.”

 

That’s a good point. They didn’t interview any young people. And I think you’ll find that the young people are the most affected by cost of living. They’re the most affected by pressure on the job market, the supply and demand of just basic jobs.

 

And, yeah, they’re also the most politically radical Left and Right. So you would get both sides if you interviewed left young people, you’d get a more extreme Left and you’d get a more extreme Right.

 

So, yeah, the media is dishonest. We know this. But it’s important that they covered it. I think we’ve been in the news every day for like, weeks now. I can’t think of a day that we haven’t been in the news in Australia.

 

So the whole news cycle is turning into, like one part sports, one part bullshit politics with boring politicians, one part condemning White Australia, basically. One part condemning the men in black, the black block of bandits, the rebellion! You know what I mean? That’s what it’s turning into is like:

 

“Public order is low, the rebellion is rising. We have to condemn the rebellion!”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, also, of course, it has to be pointed out that they probably did interview people in the town who said that they were supportive of us, but they’re not going to put that on the news, are they? Because it’s a hit piece.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, of course.

 

Joel Davis: But also as well, every time they do one of these news clips, they always say:

 

“Well, the police looking into it and investigating it.”

 

It’s like implying that we did something illegal. That like putting a piece of paper in someone’s letterbox is illegal. It’s not illegal! Putting a piece of paper in someone’s letterbox. I mean, it’s absurd! Why the police looking into something as minute as that? Shouldn’t they be worried about crime? Shouldn’t they be worried about people getting robbed or domestic violence or like, things that actually are important? That is their actual job. So, yeah, I mean, it’s just kind of ridiculous!

 

But I think it’s great because it’s desensitizing the public. Them constantly talking about us over and over and over and over again! The public are becoming more and more accustomed to the fact that we’re just a part of everyday Australian life. We’re part of the conversation. And more and more of them are starting to question why we are being treated in such a completely incongruent way with every other political group? Why we’re being treated like terrorists for simply doing peaceful protests and handing out leaflets? You know, if anyone else hands out leaflets or does peaceful protests, it pretty much doesn’t even make the news let alone is it an issue that is apparently, you know, illegal?

 

Thomas Sewell: The way the media and those., … What was it? I can’t even pronounce the name. What is it? Ratman or something? Isn’t there like a Chindian jeet Senator or MP called Ratman? Like Senator Ratman or MP Ratman. The brown chick that was on the news segment.

 

Joel Davis: I ratioed the fuck out of her on Twitter.

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And she was saying:

 

“We attacked the protest!”

 

It’s called a counter-protest. They do it to us all the time. When we did Living Space for Whites, they came down, you know, 250 or so strong to counter-protest us. And then what did the media put in the news that night? They put in that anti-racist protesters and racist protesters clashed the city. They didn’t put down that there was a peaceful stop immigration rally by White Australians and they were just attacked and ambushed by the Left.

 

[11:41]

 

So this shows you how clear and obvious and why a lot of the strategies that people want to employ are never going to work.

 

A lot of people think that:

 

“Oh, but if we just presented ourselves better, if we just wore a suit and tie, if we just did all these other strategies, it would work.”

 

It’s like, you can do that you can do that strategy. Look how they treated those, I mean, those feminists, they’re not even Right-wing. They’re Left-wing. They’re just Left-wingers that are against trannies. And look at how they were treated by the media. They were basically treated as if they were on the same camp as us. So, I mean, that was part of our ploy.

 

But the point is that the media is going to always have control of their own narrative. They’re never going to be unbiased. They have an agenda and they’re going to promote that agenda. And that agenda is when White people protest:

 

“White people evil!”

 

No matter how you do it, evil, or it didn’t happen, basically. Because if they can’t smear you, they’re just not going to put it up. And brown people:

 

“Always mostly peaceful.”

 

[chuckling] No matter what they’re doing, they could be burning the city:

 

“Mostly peaceful!”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And if they aren’t burning the city down, then:

 

“Peaceful!”

 

And not just that, they celebrate it. They like when the abos do a big protest and there’s like 5,000 of them or something, the media put up:

 

“How amazing they are! How incredible they are! How they’re just magnificent, wonderful people! And just the most enormous protest and just the crowds and the atmosphere!”

 

Like, they talk it up. They do their own hype videos for them.

 

So yeah, people think they’re going to get a fair go from the media are delusional. This is the strategy that we have. It’s working. And what we’re doing is we’re impacting the psyche of the Australian people. They’re turning on the news and they’re like:

 

“Oh, fuck, Nazis versus refugees! Nazis versus trannies! Nazis versus this!”

 

It’s like we’re putting up opposition to everything that they don’t like. And, yeah, it’s working. It’s really working! It’s taking all the time to start working, but it is starting to work.

 

I mean, the comment sections are just, sometimes they’re like 95, 100 percent in our favour. Other times they’re like 70%.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, we went through some of the comments sections in response to the Corowa rally that we did last week on the show, like particularly all the Facebook Boomers in the Sky News comment section that were backing us up. And I was scrolling through a few comments sections about our rally the other day and other issues, and I’m seeing the same trend where a lot of Right-wingers are starting to defend us on the basis of:

 

“Well, how come the media is attacking them for doing the same thing that the Palestinian protesters are allowed to do or other Left-wing protest groups are apparently allowed to do, and the media gives them sympathetic coverage.”

 

But when we go out in the streets, apparently we’re horrible racists. You know, a lot of people were saying that we weren’t Nazis, even though we were, but they were trying to defend us. They’re trying to say:

 

“The media is smearing these guys as neo-Nazis. They just seem to be patriots like against immigration or whatever.”

 

And that’s funny, but it shows that people are starting to kind of feel like the attacks on us are attacks on them. That the fairness of the entire discourse and the political process in this country is being revealed to be totally fake and totally skewed against White people and totally skewed against patriots, nationalists and so on. And the attacks that are coming on us, basically forms of attacks on them.

 

And the more that they identify with us and see attacks on us as attacks on them, the better, because then they’re going to start to realise that the Nazis are the guys that are in their corner, up against ZOG [Zionist Occupied Government], up against the system, up against the government, up against the establishment.

 

So that’s what we’re trying to create with this. You know, the kind of dramatic confrontation in the street, the way that we march, the way that we carry ourselves, the way that I go on Twitter and so do you and others and just try and savage these politicians constantly. Just putting up a fight and more and more people are seeing that and realizing:

 

“Well, who else is putting up a fight?”

 

No one else has the balls to just go straight for the jugular on the whole system and say, like:

 

“We’re just going to take on all of you and we’re just going to openly defy you!”

 

And that’s so important that people start to realise that that defiance, which is supposed to be part of the Australian character, we were, this is a nation that was supposed to be built off convict stock in many ways, right? We’re supposed to be rebels. You know, we’re a nation that worshiped Ned Kelly, the outlaw bushranger. You know, we’re supposed to have that about us, that we don’t like authority, we don’t get pushed around.

 

But in the last few decades, this country has become cucked! Like, and I think the response to Covid really exemplified that. Obviously, where the country’s response to that was pathetic! Like, yeah, there was a protest movement and there was a lot of valiant people in that protest movement.

 

[17:00]

 

But overall, the vast majority of people were compliant, little like goy cattle. And when you react to authority so submissively, well, now authority knows that it can get away with anything. And that needs to be reversed. We need to reassert a hard defiance to win back actually respect from the establishment, to realise that:

 

“Hey, like, if you want to tyrannise over us, it’s going to be a fight. You aren’t just going to be able to get it for free!”

 

That’s the only way that you can win freedom in this world is if you’re going to fight for it! That’s the only way that you can secure your interests in this world, is if the people who are against you are afraid to take actions, to turn up the heat on you because they don’t want the heat turned up on them.

 

Like, I’m not going to name names, but I saw an article written by, frankly, an irrelevant nationalist leader that no one actually really knows, talking about why:

 

“It’s not the time to be openly declaring hostility against the system because we can’t afford to take a loss. We can’t afford to go out there and expose ourselves to the repression of the system and getting in trouble, essentially, and the movement will be set back if we do that, we have to stay in the shadows, stay in the safe places and build up slowly.”

 

And all I was reading was the rationalisation for doing nothing. That’s all I was reading. Because there is no other way but taking the fight to the system. Because the only way that you’re going to be able to win over the people to actually support you is if you show that you’re willing to take on the system on their behalf. If you’re going to the people and saying:

 

“Hey, I’m not really willing to be standing up to the enemy and taking the shots from the enemy, taking the heat from the system.”

 

Why would they respect you? Why would they care about your leadership? They’ve got no reason to because you’re not actually backing it up. So, it sucks! It sucks that we have to fight, but that’s just the reality. It’s either fight or die. That’s literally all politics fundamentally comes down to is, are you willing to fight for it or not? And if you’re not, and the enemy knows that you’re not, they’ll just run roughshod over you.

 

And that’s why the system is getting away with murder, essentially. And the egregiousness of how anti-White this system is, how egregious double standards that we just keep seeing over and over again! Injustice when it comes to immigration, when it comes to any issue, White people have no dignity. White people have no respect. White interests aren’t even allowed to be articulated. If you articulate White interests, you are castigated as some immoral social outcasts that apparently everyone must proactively condemn. And if you don’t proactively condemn them, you become persona non-grata in mainstream politics. And you can’t have anything to, or you can’t even work in a major corporation or be a prominent public figure in any respect. Like, you’re just totally marginalised.

 

Whereas every other group is able to have their victim narratives. And essentially they’re supposed to have the red carpet rolled out for them to waltz into the country and just be given all of our stuff! Given the whole country! We’re just supposed to just hand it over to these people just because they exist? It’s fucking ridiculous!

 

And that’s because White people are simply fucking not resisting. We’re not resisting. Like, it’s our fault. It’s our fault. We are literally pussified, bitchified as a fucking race! That we are just standing there and taking this. And we are trying to inspire the people to say:

 

“Hey, like, you don’t have to fucking take it anymore!”

 

And it’s kind of crude, but if we don’t do this, it’s done! Like, it’s over! Like, there’s no clean way. Let’s just pretend that we’re not actually racist and then gradually work within the paradigm of the system to secure our interests. That will not succeed. Like, ultimately, at some point, there’s going to have to be, no! White people deserve dignity. White people deserve representation. White Australians, we fucking own this country! We fucking built it! This is our fucking country! And we demand respect! We demand acknowledgement at the very least! But more than acknowledgement, we demand that our will be done! And like, that’s a crazy idea to most people. That just shows how warped the mindset of the masses really is.

 

So, I mean, this stuff is probably obvious to most people watching. And it’s so basic and fundamental, but it has to be explained because the amount of these fucking, … I saw Craig Kelly, who was a Senator for the Liberal Party, then he got kicked out of the Liberal Party for being too Right-wing.

 

And I think he ended up joining the United Australia Party. He lost the last election on that ticket. Then he joined the One Nation party and fell out with Pauline Hanson and left within a few months before any election had occurred. Now he seems to be flirting with the Libertarian Party. I wouldn’t be surprised if he tries to run for the Senate at the next election on the Libertarian Party ticket in New South Wales. And he’s like anti-immigration and he’s one of the most Right-wing mainstream politicians in Australia. But he was arguing with one of the accounts on Twitter called the White Australia Policy. That’s one thing that I like about Craig Kelly is that he’ll at least engage with people from our side somewhat online. No other politician really does that.

 

But what he was saying basically was that:

 

“Listen, like, you can’t put your anti-immigration stance in terms of race because then that means the Left can call you racist, we have to make anti-immigration, we have to give it some other reason. Like, we’re against immigration because it’s causing a housing crisis or it’s bad for Australian culture or something.”

 

But the subtext of what Craig was saying, because he was replying to an account that’s literally called the White Australia Policy, was that like:

 

“No, wink, wink, nudge, nudge. I agree with you, but you’re going about this the wrong way. Like, yes, obviously we want to keep Australia White, but we can’t say that!”

 

And it’s well, if we can’t say that, we’re not going to do it! Its really that simple.

 

[23:44]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I don’t have anything to respond to that you just said, like, yeah, the article. I did see the article. I didn’t open it. I know the one you’re talking about. I believe it was called “The revolution will not be publicized” or something like that, which is an interesting axiom.

 

And one of my colleagues told me that it was sort of trying to go down a path of explaining a new form of meta-political guerrilla warfare. That’s interesting. I think ultimately let a thousand flowers blossom. I’ve had my disagreements with these kind of strategies. I’ve tried to do that in the past.

 

And what I found was it recruited people that had very little political agency. So then if your plan is to just grow slowly in the background for, say, ten years or eight years, two things, two problems with that. One, you’re giving up on everyone right now, and for the next eight years, that is politically motivated. And what you’re doing is you’re recruiting people that aren’t very politically motivated. But, and this is a word that I don’t use often. Jacob usually says it, but what you’re doing is you’re building ultimately, a “comfort club”.

 

Because if your plan is:

 

“Oh, we’ll do something in a year’s time or two years or three years or four years.”

 

Then you’re kind of going to recruit a group of people that will just perpetually ideas, man. And it breeds things like committees as well. Adolf Hitler stays very clearly in Mein Kampf that this is a bad way of organising.

 

So what separates the doers and the kind of, I wouldn’t use word “schemers”. It’s probably a bit too rough. But what separates the doers and the people that are kind of still thinking about how they’re going to go about doing it. That’s okay if you do that for a little bit, you should still try to do as much as you can while you’re kind of planning the next stage. That’s how everything happens.

 

But experience is learnt through action, and that’s why we’re doing what we’re doing. We’re putting as much energy as we can trying to find a solution in real time. And we’re recruiting other people that are also men of action. Like when you see us marching in the street or you see us training or whatever, the whole idea of it, of getting active or these men of action is that you’re building a culture of getting work done, versus building a culture of, Hitler says in Mein Kampf:

 

“The committee men are permanently pregnant with ideas they never are able to give birth to.”

 

And I experience this a lot. There’s a lot of people involved in the movement, and a lot of them, sorry, in the wider movement that aren’t members of the organisation that support us. You know, through thoughts and prayers and sometimes financially, and a small subset of those people feel the need to tell us how to do what we’re doing and how to do it better. And it’s usually something that’s not needed to be done by myself, it’s usually something that they could do.

 

And when I say to them, because my go to whenever I get this is, I say:

 

“Why don’t you do it?”

 

And they will say:

 

“No, no, no, this is not something I can do. This is something you need to do!”

 

And so:

 

“Oh, I take instructions from strangers on the Internet. That’s how I need to run the organisation. I need to do this for you, not the other way around, not, hey, why don’t you get involved? Or, hey, why don’t you build this project?”

 

So I find that it builds a culture of people like that. And that’s what we had in the early days. It was like a social club. It was a comfort club. And there was just so many ideas floating around. And of the original 21 guys in Melbourne of this comfort club, when I actually said:

 

“Okay, let’s build a gym, let’s make a gym. Like, I’ll put the money down I want some trump bucks.”

 

And, yeah, like, I think only three guys trained with me out of 21. I was like:

 

“Okay, all right.”

 

So we want to build this. Everyone wanted to build this. Everyone agreed to building this. Everyone put their hand on the table and said:

 

“We’re going to do it.”

 

And then when it’s actually time to do it, …

 

And so that’s a problem with it. You wait eight years, you’re going to waste eight years with that group of people, or most of them, the vast majority of them. So it’s better to just recruit high quality people that want to get work done now.

 

But as I said, let a thousand flowers blossom. There’s a lot of different strategies out there. It’s good to have waves of momentum, but in the absence of action it can have a habit of giving up on all these people. Like, how many people support us right now? How many people have the narrative? Well, what I was saying on Twitter the other day was the idea that most people simply aren’t political and we are politicizing them. We’re charging them with politics that could be useful in eight years time.

 

And I think that’s what everyone should be trying to do, not just form comfort clubs. People should be trying to work out in whatever way possible to politicise the public! To make them pick a side. That’s ultimately what we need division in society. We need to divide the people that hate Australia and hate White people. We need to divide them away from the people that love Australia and love White people. That’s our ultimate goal! We can’t secure a future for our children without getting away or separating or segregating or building separate institutions.

 

So, yeah, it’s frustrating some of the time.

 

[29:33]

 

Joel Davis: Sorry, I thought you were finished.

 

Thomas Sewell: I was just saying it’s frustrating that people, … I do get the feeling sometimes that a lot of eyes are on us, and I do feel these little digs sometimes at what we’re doing. Like, the word used in the article was “recklessness”. That recklessness has gotten us nowhere. It’s like, recklessness, like, what, on the weekend or on Tuesday? Like, standing up for the people of Corowa? Like, no one knew about that’s recklessness? Like, we’re not as polite as we could be. I don’t know how to explain it. There’s softer ways of going about it. But who would know? Who would know what’s going on in this country? And who would know that there’s anyone, …

 

You know, I believe that what we need most, i’ll finish on this. What we need most in this country is and in the world is White men need a return of heroism! We need heroism! We don’t have any heroism. The standard for heroism, heroism is so low that we’re considered in our, like, we’re not even getting shot at! But the standard for heroism for White men is so low, people aren’t even afraid of warfare and these very brutal concepts because they’re so detached. They’re worried about losing their job.

 

But the Taliban in Afghanistan, they’re not worried about losing their job. That doesn’t mean anything to them. They’re worried about getting killed by Russian soldiers or American soldiers or by some other, and I’m not just saying the Taliban, any, you know, group in the Middle East, for example, their standard for heroism is so much higher.

 

And I know we’re not at war, not yet, anyway. But it’s a spiritual war, and we need spiritual heroes. We need people that have the courage of their convictions and yeah, anyway, moving on!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. That’s also the power of calling ourselves Nazis, because we are getting a situation where we’ve created a situation where there are so many White Australians that don’t even really know anything about National Socialism or what this word “Nazi” really means. Apparently, it’s a bad thing! But they support us anyway.

 

People were saying that:

 

“No one’s going to support you because you call yourself Nazis, and it’s bad optics!”

 

And it’s well, all of these conservative types that we were supposed to appeal to, they’re starting to support us now anyway, and they’re rationalizing it by, like defending us from the charge of being Nazis or whatever. That’s the beauty of what we’re doing. Because it’s one thing trying to sit down and explain to someone:

 

“Hey, the Nazis weren’t the bad guys.”

 

I can hear Jacob has arrived. But it’s another thing to show that the Nazis are the good guys by being the good guys, actually, right now in 2024 Australia! And then that completely transforms the entire structure of political discourse, because if the Nazis are the good guys now, but this is apparently the worst possible thing that you can be, that turns everything on its head! That one move.

 

I’ll scooch over here for old man.

 

Jacob Hersant: Good evening, Klansmen!

 

Thomas Sewell: Hello.

 

Jacob Hersant: Hey, guys.

 

Thomas Sewell: Geez, we’re all in the black block tonight. What’s going on? Did we co-ordinate?

 

Joel Davis: We look good in black.

 

Jacob Hersant: Only feds can co-ordinate uniforms. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Only feds can be fit. Why do we always show up? This is what I want to know.

 

Actually, I have two things. Now that Jacob’s here, I can joke around a bit, because with Joel, it’s always so serious. Joel can joke around, but I’m just saying it’s a different kind of mood. Jacob’s here. I can talk shit!

 

So, two things. One, why do we always show up whenever there’s legislation that needs passing? Do you work for the federal government, Jacob Hersant? Is that why you organised activism recently?

 

Jacob Hersant: They’ve always got an agenda. They always got new legislation to take away our freedoms.

 

Thomas Sewell: And then they sprayed us with just water, soapy water? And that’s how we were able to get those other shots later, because we weren’t actually pepper sprayed. This really happened.

 

Second thing that I want to go into is I made the mistake of watching Netflix recently, and my entire worldview has changed. I have to say, Jacob, I watched a movie. It had Liam Neeson in it. Its a new one.

 

And I thought to myself, I wonder how long I’m going to last watching this movie. It’s kind of like a standard Liam Neeson movie, like, Taken. But instead of rescuing his White daughter, he’s protecting and saving a little brown child, like a little Mexican. And after watching this masterful work of art, of not propaganda, but just pure art, pure apolitical art, I found that I had to challenge my own worldview.

 

[34:52]

 

And what I realised was we actually have more in common with brown people. We have so much in common with brown people. I found that there was actually two types of people. Because what this movie showed very clearly to me and educated me, was that us and brown people, we’re dealing with the same issues. We’re actually all on the same team. And really, the other, there’s us and there’s them, and there’s this divisive people that are trying to put borders between a fake us and them. Us and brown people. Really, us and brown people are the same. And the real us and theme is all the people that are trying to divide us. You see, that’s the real “them”. The “them” are the dividers! And the “us” is everyone that doesn’t want to be divided. And yeah, the US government, the cartels, basically are working together. And us and the brown people are like, viva la resistance, you know, we’re like the proletariat, the workers of the world that you need to unite and overthrow the evil cartels and the US government. What do you think about that, Jacob?

 

Jacob Hersant: It was just the truth! What can I add to the gospel? I don’t know! [chuckling] Yeah. I would just be humiliating myself, even trying to add footnotes to that.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I guess because God, like, he made the brown people brown and gave them all these different genetics, and then he gave us all these White genetics. And that was really unfair because that really divides us.

 

So we should really hail Satan now, I guess, [Tom laughing] because Satan is the ultimate unifier, like, trying to rebel against this asshole God that created this natural difference. Like, the idea that,

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh god!

 

Joel Davis: Like, women, like, can’t play chess as well as men. Like, what is that about? That’s really dividing us. Women must really hate that when they see it in the chess tournaments that they have to have a women’s only chess tournament, because that kind of implies something about their cognitive ability or, like these blacks like their average IQ was like 85 [American mixed blacks – African blacks, 70]. Like, why would God do that to them? Like, God is a fucking White supremacist! Like, he’s a fucking piece of shit Nazi. We got to kill him!

 

Thomas Sewell: Thoughts, Jacob?

 

Jacob Hersant: Well, I thought Joel Davis and your friend Nietzsche already killed God. We don’t have to do anything. But did you guys already talk about Fuck Off We’re Full?

 

Joel Davis: No, no. We held our balls until you arrived and ruined the whole beginning of the show where we’re just yapping.

 

Jacob Hersant: That’s all right.

 

Joel Davis: Everyone is here for that, and we didn’t even talk about it.

 

Anyway, here we go.

 

Thomas Sewell: We covered the article, “The revolution will not be publicized”, and our “reckless” behaviour. And how to properly do meta-political guerrilla warfare. I don’t know if you want to comment on that, Jacob.

 

Jacob Hersant: Am I a political gorilla? Yeah. I had someone concern trolling on one of the videos I put on Twitter. It was like, some brown woman who I think pretends is one of us.

 

Thomas Sewell: Margo Huss? [chuckling]

 

Jacob Hersant: I don’t know. Maybe it was her. I can’t remember her name, but she was concerned trolling, saying:

 

“How can you be a racist National Socialist if you accept Marxist socialism in the form of welfare payments?”

 

And then I just responded:

 

“I don’t think I’m going to lose any sleep over taking resources from the enemy and using it for my own cause. I’m a political guerrilla. I don’t care!”

 

It’d be like. [chuckling] It’d be like concern trolling when you’re on a battlefield and you take a spear of the enemy, and they’re like:

 

“Well, you’re using the enemy’s equipment! So actually, you’re relying on the enemy!”

 

It’s like:

 

“Okay, yeah, you convinced me. I won’t.”

 

Yeah, it’s just insanity!

 

But the amount of concern, trolling and retardation I get in the comments is insane! You think Twitter would probably be the worst because it’s a bit of a free for all, but the worst is actually Gab. Like the retardation I experienced on Gab it just takes the cake. So you think it’d just be an echo chamber of our guys. But there’s so many, there’s so many different people on there, it’s insane! Like, you even find Leftists on Gab. I don’t know what’s going on there, but it’s interesting.

 

Joel Davis: I thought it would be fun to go on like the Left-wing version of Gab and just be a Nazi on there. But the thing is, you’d get banned straight away. That’s the annoying thing about free speech. Like, I don’t really like giving Leftist free speech. Like, we really want to do it? Like that’s the we pro-free speech until we win, and then probably not anymore. And that’s the thing about all these rules. They’re like:

 

“Well, that’s not consistent!”

 

Like, if you want the enemy to respect your rules, you want the enemy to respect the kind of like fair play against you, then you should respect the fair play against them. But obviously the enemy doesn’t actually do that.

 

But like, in your example of taking like welfare payments from ZOG, it’s well, if ZOG’s dumb enough to give you money, you might as well take it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, the free speech thing, I think, …

 

Joel Davis: A structure of rules that exist to defend. Yeah, that exists under the pretence of a liberal democracy that was created by White people for White people, where we could have a gentlemanly combat between the representatives of the working class and the representatives of the middle class. It’s like, yes, that can be a gentlemanly political conflict because ultimately we’re all still like White Christian Australians at that time or whatever. We’ve got so much more in common than we have that separates us.

 

[40:50]

 

 

But when you have like a system that has been totally hijacked by like communists and jews and all other kinds of parasites, corporate like subversion, and so on, it gets to the point where, well, why would you have any loyalty to that, like, structure anymore? Like, you might as well just play it and gamify it to maximize the amount of benefit that you can receive from it until you get into a position where you can overthrow it and instantiate a kind of order that enables you to completely, you know, wipe the slate clean and hit the reset button, which is the position that we need to go to now.

 

And I actually, I dealt with this guy, James Lindsay, who’s this American conservative. He’s a classical liberal, but he basically has found himself in Team conservative because he says the Left have gone woke with collectivism, and they’re not loyal to classical liberal principles. So now he’s, like, stuck on the Right-wing, but he’s constantly just complaining. Now he calls it the “Woke Right”, which is anyone on the Right-wing who wants to actually win, who wants to destroy the woke Left. It’s like:

 

“The woke Left is a problem, but you can’t destroy them. We have to give the woke Left all of these rights and just sit around and complain about the woke Left and what they’re doing.”

 

Apparently. But if we become the woke Right, we’re just as bad as them. It’s like when they say:

 

“Oh, this is just identity politics. Like, when, like, really what the Left-wing want is for White people to come together and practice identity politics because that’s the whole purpose is to divide us!”

 

And that kind of idea. It’s that same principle. And I said:

 

“So on one side, you have the woke Left that are trying to genocide the White race. On the other side, you have people like me, apparently, because I said a pro-National Socialist thing on Twitter. So that makes me woke Right?”

 

Apparently.

 

So I don’t want the White race to be genocided. I would rather seize power and destroy the people that are trying to genocide me. And I said:

 

“So what does that make you, James? You don’t like either of these sides. The woke Left, the woke Right. So what, are you just asleep? You just asleep in the middle?”

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes!

 

Joel Davis: He didn’t really have a response because this idea that, like, seizing power equals wokeness or something, and therefore it’s bad. It’s like, the problem with the enemy isn’t that they’re seizing power, it’s that they’re the enemy! Like, if we had power, it’d be awesome! Like, a dictatorship is awesome if it’s your guys that are running it! Only sucks if it’s your enemies that are running it! Like, ultimately, everything comes down to who’s wielding it. Like, guns are cool if the people who have them aren’t trying to shoot you with them. They only become a problem when they get pointed in your face. And their ideology is like:

 

“But no one should have guns, so then no one can point them at anyone’s faces.”

 

And then it’s like:

 

“Okay, so you’ve put your gun, you’ve left your gun at home, and then the enemy rocks up with guns. And now what the fuck are we gonna do?”

 

Well, if I go and get a gun and shoot back at them, apparently I’m just as bad as them. [chuckling] It’s fucking retarded! This is the mentality of conservatives and liberals, like, classic liberals.

 

Thomas Sewell: They can’t extrapolate the most basic self defense principles into the political theatre. But you’re regarding freedom of speech, before we go on to the rally. Yeah. It’s important to identify the enemy. There’s always an enemy. You have to identify it.

 

And then you can have freedom of speech for the citizens. You can have freedom of speech for the members of the fog, because they’re not the enemy.

 

Now, the only caveat you have to have to that, otherwise the same exact situation is going to happen again, is how do you deal with traitors?

 

So once you’ve removed the enemy from the equation, there’s not like a foreign interference trying to disrupt your society and use your freedom of speech against you still are going to have these kind of bio-Leninists. You’re going to have these biological traitors that just spawn every now and then.

 

And the more unsettling your environment is, the more horrible your social environment is as a country, as a nation, the more common these people are going to spawn, which is in itself an autoimmune function, or a cancer, an anti-autoimmune function. It’s like an autoimmune disease of the nation. And so freedom of speech in itself helps expose this problem that you then have to solve, which is a biological issue related to its environment.

 

So freedom of speech, I like freedom of speech, but, yeah, you just don’t give it to your enemy. So it’s just about how do you legislate that? How do you write that into a constitutional wording that doesn’t kind of violate its own principle, but protects the nation with longevity. That’s difficult. That’s probably the hard part.

 

Joel Davis: Well, you just get rid of all the enemies from the territory, and then you everyone free speech, because there’s no enemies left.

 

Thomas Sewell: But you still have traitors, you still have people spawn.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course.

 

Thomas Sewell: The eternal jew, kind of, even when there’s no jews in the society, there’s still like Purple [word unclear] or whatever the fuck his name is.

 

[45:39]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! So, like the, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Like the bio Leninists,

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course.

 

Thomas Sewell: So that’s what I was saying. Yeah, I don’t want to get too deep into it because I can see Jacob’s, like, wandering off. He’s like:

 

“Just Fed post in [word unclear]. Get them all!”

 

Joel Davis: Let’s pull up the Nine News. I mean, Seven News covered it, but I like the Nine News coverage better, so I’m going to play the Nine News coverage of the rally.

 

Nine News: Neo-Nazi thugs who gate crashed a peaceful pro-refugee rally in Docklands have been pepper sprayed during a violent confrontation with police. No arrests were made, but investigators are working to identify members of the far-Right group. Gillian Lantouris reports.

Nine News: (Gillian Lantouris) A peaceful protest met with hate. Tensions reached boiling point as neo-Nazis clash with a refugee rally. Police, forced to use their batons and pepper spray, chased away from Burke street in Docklands. The far-Right group continued spreading their hostility nearby.

NSN: Are we ever gonna see your race again? No way! Get fucked! Fuck off!

Nine News: (Gillian Lantouris) Refugee protesters were marking 100 days and nights of camping outside the Department of Home affairs office, calling for permanent visas for eight and a half thousand people, when they were ambushed around six last night.

Aran Mylvaganam: (Refugee Encampment Organiser) Saying things like, “Hail victory, White power, Australia for White men.” These sort of chants shouldn’t be allowed.

 

Joel Davis: Wait. I just want to try and say his name. What is his name?

 

Thomas Sewell: Malvaganum.

 

Joel Davis: No, no. This guy. Aaran Malvaganum. Milvagenum?

 

Jacob Hersant: John Gangnam! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: The cunt that’s telling us what we shouldn’t be. We shouldn’t be allowed to say in our own fucking country! Look at this cunt anyway.

 

Aran Mylvaganam: These sort of chance shouldn’t be allowed.

Nine News: (Gillian Lantouris) Many attendees, like Rathy Barthlote, have fled war torn countries seeking safety in Melbourne.

 

Jacob Hersant: Check the smile. Coming up.

 

Nine News: (Gillian Lantouris) Greens MP Samantha Ratnam was there.

Samantha Ratnam: (Greens MP) It’s frightening and it’s devastating to see these racists so emboldened that they feel like they can come and attack a peaceful rally.

Nine News: (Gillian Lantouris) Politicians from all sides united condemning the behaviour!

Jacinta Allan: (Vic Premier) Disgraceful cowards! They hide behind masks and they absolutely do not represent any single part of this great state!

Peter Dutton: (MP, Leader of the Opposition, Liberal Party) I hope the police can take appropriate action.

Nine News: (Gillian Lantouris) So there’s calls for harsher penalties.

Jacinta Allan: (Vic Premier) We have strengthened powers on these matters and we’re looking at what more we can do to strengthen our anti-vilification framework.

Nine News: (Gillian Lantouris) No arrests have been made, but police will be reviewing security footage in the hopes they can identify the individuals involved and hold them to account.

Samantha Ratnam: (Greens MP) The government must take this threat seriously. We can’t just rely on the police to keep us safe.

Nine News: Meanwhile, a high profile, …

 

Joel Davis: Anyway. Yeah, the coverage was awesome! The crying brown lady like, I really don’t think that that’s going to play well with Right-wing Australians. I think Right-wing Australians will look at that and think this is just so egregious propaganda. Like, these browns, we already drew attention to this before, but they’re just literally not even Australians! And they’re demanding that they just have the right to be in our country, just because!

 

Thomas Sewell: The second half of that film clip of that news clip, is that where it ends? Is I think, he’s a Palestinian. And he got caught doing the swastika at a rally.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah!

 

Thomas Sewell: And it was a horrible segment. It’s a bit off topic from the rally, but did you watch that new segment? You should put it up later.

 

It said his wife was his business partner. She’s left him because he did this swastika Israeli flag. And then she did an interview with the media saying that she’s, like, really going to focus on rebuilding the restaurant. She full like, boss wifedom. And she’s like, she’s divorced him, so that she can secure the bag, because the restaurant was going under because it was getting boycotted. And she’s like, she threw her husband and business partner, like, who’s the same person under the table and denounced him!

 

And I think he’s a Palestinian that was trying to make the point that Israel are the new Nazis and put the swastika up. Crazy!

 

Joel Davis: Probably won’t even get in any trouble for it, because the law seems already, …

 

Thomas Sewell: He’s already pled guilty. Nah, he’s already pled guilty.

 

Jacob Hersant: He pled guilty.

 

Joel Davis: What an idiot! He could afford that.

 

Jacob Hersant: What did he display, a swastika? What was it specifically?

 

Thomas Sewell: I think Nickel had the full, …

 

Joel Davis: It was like an Israeli flag, but instead of the Star of David in the middle, had a swastika in the middle.

 

Jacob Hersant: Okay. Yeah. That’s crazy!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But anyway. What? I mean. Lol.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah go back to the rally.

 

Joel Davis: But no, the coverage. I mean, they get the police, they’re gonna try and identify who was there. Well, I was fucking there! I mean, my face is out. I haven’t got any calls from the cops, haven’t come around to the house. So, like, obviously, they’re not gonna do shit! There’s just some platitude that they say. Because we didn’t commit any crimes. They committed crimes against us! They literally pepper sprayed us for no fucking reason! Like, we were just standing there. So that was definitely, like, excessive force.

 

And the reason why they pepper sprayed us, in my opinion, was because a lot of those police officers were women. And they just freaked out and didn’t know what to do.

 

And so, you know, they’ve done studies on this. Like, women are way more trigger happy. Women shouldn’t be fucking cops! Like, it’s particularly crowd control of all the fucking jobs that you could give them. Absolutely insane!

 

But anyway, getting pepper sprayed in the face was pretty fun. I enjoyed that. The clip of you, like:

 

“What are you gonna fucking do?”

 

[chuckling]

 

Jacob Hersant: Like, [loud laughing] hands to my side:

 

“What are you gonna fucking do!”

 

[52:07]

 

Joel Davis: And also my objective for this rally was very simple. I wanted to get, because we came up with the idea in the group chat with the boys of, so this might be Americans and stuff that don’t know about this. You can go on my Telegram and see what the song is because I posted it for the benefit of foreigners to understand the reference. But there’s this classic Aussie pub rock song by a band called The Angels called “Am I ever gonna see your face again?” And they were playing it in the pub scene in the eighties, and eventually some drunk cunt decided to scream out in response to the chorus of, “Am I ever gonna see your face again?”, “No way! Get fucked, fuck off!”.

 

And then the rest of the crowd started chanting it and it became ubiquitous all over Australia. To the point that whenever they do live gigs, the whole crowd does it. And the front man even has a shirt that says, “No way, get fucked! Fuck off!”, on it. Cause they’ve totally embraced it. And this is like a classic Aussie meme that’s been around since the eighties.

 

And when I was growing up, I remember, like, my parents, like, red pilling me on the “No way, get fucked, fuck off!”, as a young boy, like:

 

“You gotta, like, everyone sings that at this point of the song!”

 

It’s like this, like ancient Australian meme, basically.

 

And then we had the idea of changing the lyrics to “Am I ever going to see your race again?” Instead of face again? Because the whole point of that rally, because we confronted it a few months ago. We did the “Fuck Off, We’re Full”, 1.0. This was “Fuck Off, We’re Full” 2.0. And 1.0 was when they just started getting established and we wanted to go down and draw attention to it and tell them to fuck off, basically. Get out of our country. And that was hilarious! We had a good time with that.

 

But they’ve been out there like, ever since. They have literally been camping there. They had charities bringing them, like, free food tents and everything. And they’ve just been, like, doing their inane chants and their broken English, just harassing pedestrians. And they’ve been doing it all over the country, by the way, not just in Melbourne.

 

And eventually, finally, like a week or two ago, Vic Pol [Victorian Police] was sent down by the council to clean all of their shit out and move them on, finally, because they were just annoying everyone. A few of them have actually got notices to get deported. We infiltrated a Left-wing group chat and found that out. So that’s quite funny.

 

So hopefully they all get deported. I’m sure a lot of them will have jewish NGO’s and communist NGO’s, like, with human rights, quote, unquote, “lawyers” that’ll try and keep them in the country, and it’ll become a protracted drama.

 

But the point is that this was like their kind of closing rally where they’re closing down the encampment and giving up, basically.

 

So we wanted to go down and mogg them to say, like:

 

“We fucking won! Like, fuck you! Like, you lost. You didn’t get your permanent visas now or whatever, you fucking brown dogs!”

 

And so the “No way! Get fucked! Fuck off!”, was a beautiful sentiment that we wanted to communicate. I wanted that to go on the news because there’s so many, maybe the Zoomers won’t get it. Some of them will if they are in touch with the culture of their parents. But old Millennials and Gen-X’s will fucking froth that! They’ll love that! And because [chuckling] it’s the kind of Aussie ingenuity to take that song. And that’s part of the beauty of using the “Fuck Off, We’re Full” banner, which is also like an ancient Australian proverb, that’s like a bumper sticker from the eighties and the nineties that every racist would slap on the back of their car like a picture of Australia with an Australian flag that said, “Fuck Off, We’re Full”. You’d slap it on the back of the ute to indicate that you’re just sick of immigrants.

 

So we were channeling some Australiana. Like, we were channeling the culture of Australia when it was still fucking White! When White Australia was still dominant and taken for granted by itself. And we were the monoculture. And we were trying to create that nostalgia, you know, particularly in somewhat the older generation of:

 

“Remember when everyone was White? Remember when there was no Indians at Coles. When you go to Coles and everyone was White, remember when everyone was pleasant? Remember when there weren’t, like, gangs of fucking criminal negroes, you know, stabbing children and shit? Remember what that was like. Remember what it was like to actually have a fucking country?”

 

We remember. Here you go!

 

So some of us don’t remember. Some of us are too young to remember, actually. I remember small snippets of it. That was just the very beginning of my life where it still felt like that, but it was ripped away from me almost immediately. And everyone younger than like, people who are, like, 30 have that faint memory. People who are 20 some of the boys in the organisation were 20. They have no memory of what that was like. They were born into multiculturalism. Full spectrum multiculturalism.

 

But anyway, I think we successfully pulled off the troll, and Jacob had to jump on the megaphone at the end because the pepper spray was getting too much. I’d snot pouring out my nose. I was just no longer in a state to be running the megaphone. Had a whole speech planned, and that got kind of ruined. But I didn’t keel over like a bitch and get some photo snapped by a communist that was spread all over the Internet of me being a pussy. So I’ll take that as a win.

 

[57:20]

 

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, well, you didn’t get sprayed full on. You had the glasses on.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Jacob Hersant: If you didn’t have glasses, you would have been fucked! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Jacob Hersant: Because if you see in the footage, the close up footage of some of the boys, they got that they got their mask ripped off and their glasses ripped off just before getting sprayed. They were going for it. Like, the police were going for maximum damage with the spray. And I don’t think they only had just pepper spray. I think they had the what is it? There’s, like, more chemical one and then there’s the, …

 

Thomas Sewell: They have the spray and they have the foam. So they were using both. One’s in a big can with a like, a trigger and one’s in a little spray bottle.

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah. How many people did we have incapacitated? Probably four people. Five or four?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, four.

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: By the end, I couldn’t see. [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Yes.

 

Jacob Hersant: We took about two minutes to just regroup, and then we just marched straight back in it. People that could barely see! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: We had all the blind in the middle just getting huddled in just stick together.

 

Joel Davis: I could still chant. I was still yelling, fuck off! Yeah. Like, “No way! Get fucked! Fuck Off” and shit! Yeah, I had the Sunnies on, so you couldn’t see my eyes all closed up and, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, it was funny because when we were preparing for it, one of the guys said, I told everyone to bring goggles, and they know what type of goggles to bring. And then one guy was like:

 

“What are we bringing the goggles for?”

 

And I was like:

 

“You’ll see. You’ll see!”

 

Because the police report, …

 

Joel Davis: Like, I know my glasses are so cool! I chose optics over safety!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I got a tiny bit. I got hit by a tiny bit. And because I had the goggles on it couldn’t really get in, the foam, it was pretty good. There’s a foam under the goggle, and it couldn’t seep into my eyes. But last time I got pepper sprayed was at the Stop Immigration, and they did the same thing. While we’re in the kind of the melee, while they’re trying to push and shove us around, there were cops reaching over and pulling people’s glasses down and then spraying them in the eyes. I didn’t get the full foam like that OC foam that they were using, but I got the little spray the little handheld spray, and because I got the big can and they got the little can, I got hit by the little one just directly in the eyes. And I was incapacitated for probably ten minutes. But that other stuff, I mean, that knocked guys out for almost, 20 hours. That was crazy! The big stuff. The big foam stuff.

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, I got hit with it, but I didn’t get any of it in my eyes, but I, like, my nostrils were burning and it just tasted like I ate some chili. Like, I could feel it on my breath and on my nose, but, like, nothing in my eyes, so I was just, I was loving it. So I’m just like, fuck it! I’m taking the megaphone. Let’s go!

 

Joel Davis: I kind of turned my head, but the foam went in on one side, so I was like:

 

“Okay, I guess I’m one eye down. I can do it with one eye.”

 

But then through, I guess, sweat and just everything moving around, eventually it made its way across to the other eye, and then I was fucked!

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, I was right next to you weren’t even. You weren’t in the middle. You’re next to me on the flank. And then when we’re getting sprayed. And I was already like facing the wrong way.

 

But then I looked back and that’s when they started spraying. I was like:

 

“Oh, no!”

 

I stayed away luckily, but I just got, I got a bunch of my mask, but not in the eyes. The goggles did the job.

 

Joel Davis: I was really proud of the boys that we marched around the corner staunch because we were actually, originally, we were marching through this park and then as we started marching I look ahead and I can see that the cops are basically waiting for us.

 

And I thought we can give them the slip down this alleyway and go up the other street and we can get to the confrontation with the refugees and the commies before the cops have to regroup.

 

And so we went up the side street and the refugees came and met us. There was that one spastic that was like as if he was like an archer or something with his like keys in his hand. But he didn’t do anything. He was just a retard!

 

Thomas Sewell: It was just a traditional Palestinian boxing stance.

 

[1:01:37]

 

Joel Davis: It was like, it was like some weird like karate shit that he was trying to channel. But I was just like, you’re a dickhead. What are you doing?

 

Jacob Hersant: That’s what the Leftists do.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, under Australian law you could have just fucking punched him. But it would have, the damage, …

 

You would have won it in court because what he did was assault. You can’t just like shape up to someone that’s just walking down the street even if they have a different political opinion.

 

And that’s something that I think Jacob covered last stream.

 

Joel Davis: Like go through the law and like when you can and can’t, like deploy the fists because, anyway, …

 

Thomas Sewell: He was putting keys in your face. I mean, at that point I think you’d be okay. But you made the right choice to just sort of like parry them off and then like the rest of us caught up and then as soon as, like, yeah, as soon as everyone was there, the guy kind of backed off. And then he was the main guy after that point that was pretending to kind of like try to break up the two groups or not break them up. But I don’t know if he saws I kept my eye on him because I saw what he did at the start and I was like:

 

“Okay, this guy’s gonna try and get up to no good.”

 

Joel Davis: Most went to the cops when they showed up because that was a more direct concern. Yeah, the cop came up to me and was like:

 

“You guys, you’re disturbing the piece. You’ve got five minutes to get out of here before you get arrested.”

 

Oh, no! He said five minutes first, and then 10 seconds later, it became two minutes.

 

So then we did a few chants, and then I was like:

 

“All right, let’s have a bit of a quick, like, powwow as to what’s the strategy here?”

 

And then me, as I walk over to discuss it, they just bum rush us immediately to start spraying everyone.

 

So, yeah, maybe it was the wrong decision to try and think that I had time to, like hold a committee meeting in that situation. [chuckling] It was too chill. Should have been more just on the front foot.

 

But anyway, it wouldn’t have made a difference.

 

Thomas Sewell: We were reactive. It worked well. Like, even when they were pepper spraying us, there was two young guys that got a little bit freaked out at the back. But I just went straight to the back and just kind of hold, held the formation. I was like, stay in line, cunts! [chuckling] I was like, full Triarii at the back. It was funny.

 

Joel Davis: But we ended up going back around through to the park and the Leftist had a chance to come at us. Because the communists are trying to say that they ran us out, but they had an opportunity when we first showed up.

 

And also when we got to the park, we got to the park, there was like one cop there who was like, you could see him freaking out, like:

 

“Fuck, fuck, fuck! What do we do?”

 

And the communists came. And then they stood like 5 meters away from us and just mouthed off. And I, they didn’t have the balls to come step to us in either of those situations. Apparently they punched Nazis. Apparently. Community defense. They don’t need the cops. You know:

 

“The community will run the Nazis out or whatever!”

 

They’re full of shit! They’re all a bunch of pussies!

 

Jacob Hersant: How good was The Noticer of footage with the woman? She’s like standing there still:

 

“Stay back, Nazi scum! Stay back, Nazi scum!”

 

Thomas Sewell: Was that the one with the tambourine?

 

Joel Davis: I can play some of this footage. I think that people would like to see it. Let me. Yeah.

 

So this is some of The Noticer footage, the official Noticer dot News coverage of, I guess, spliced together from different cameras, shit that got uploaded online.

 

[Video of the demo with shouts and screaming]

 

Jacob Hersant: The Indians are so funny. Look at that chad!

 

[Cops spraying them with pepper and other]

 

They love the spray! The women cops love the spray.

 

Look at, … What are these women cops doing?

 

What are we saying Tom?

 

Thomas Sewell: What were the women cops? Do you see that? Just go back a little bit. Just a smidge. It’s like half the cops are up at the line and then the other half are kind of like holding onto each other’s belts. But they’re like 20 meters behind.

 

Joel Davis: Here.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, around here. Press play. Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: What are they doing?

 

Thomas Sewell: What are they doing? Feminine [word unclear] now. She’s got a taser out.

 

[NSN guys chanting slogans]

 

Jacob Hersant: Anyway.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s basically it.

 

Jacob Hersant: That’s what Leftists call chasing us off, like just us leaving in an orderly manner.

 

Joel Davis: What are we gonna do, stand there for 2 hours?

 

Jacob Hersant: And get arrested? Like they’ll just wait for more police to show up and then they’ll kettle us and arrest us for some reason. Whether it be, …

 

Joel Davis: Also I don’t want to stand there for 2 hours just screaming the same, like chant over and over again!

 

Anyway, we made our point, like what are we going to do? They make out this idea that because they’re willing to stay there all night because they’ve got nothing better to do, like that somehow it’s a win for them. It’s like it’s not a win for you. [chuckling] The only reason anyone gives a fuck about this is because we came and paid you a visit.

 

[1:08:46]

 

Jacob Hersant: They don’t think strategically, like we’ve got a goal, a strategic goal. We go there, we achieve it, we’re done. Let’s get out of there before we waste any more resources, whether it be getting arrested or just all of our time.

 

Thomas Sewell: They don’t have to worry about that because they only get arrested by the police when they explicitly use violence against the police. Like if the rules were the same, we would never get pepper sprayed, we would never get attacked or have anything stolen by the police. We would have to do Leftist tactics with the Left when they’re in big enough numbers. They just like mob the police and then the police actually go:

 

“Oh no. Now you’re going too far!”

 

And the Leftoids on Twitter and just in general always sook, like:

 

“How come they arrest all these people on the Left but never like us, like the evil Nazis?”

 

Like because we don’t attack the police! Like it’s just stupid! Like you can win the battle. Sure. Like, it was mostly female cops. We could have smashed them.

 

But what’s the point? Like then the SWAT team comes to your house the next day, like all the leading members, all the, like it’s just fucking retarde Like what’s the point?

 

Whereas the Left, they’ll do that and then they just get bailed. And then, you know, they’ve got all these jewish, you know, human rights lawyers that just represent them. And then they get let off because it’s just a “legitimate protest”. Or they get a little bit of jail. Like, sometimes they get like a month in jail.

 

If one of us hit a cop, you’d get like two years. I reckon you’d get like one to two years for hitting a cop. As a Right-winger. As a Leftist, …

 

Jacob Hersant: Even with no criminal history, you’ll still get a year or two.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, you probably get one or two years for hitting a cop. I was just looking up, because that cop that was tearing the masks off, we actually found out who he is. And I’m just looking at the Crimes Act 1958, Section 31 D. Intimidation of a law enforcement officer or family member. Because I’m working how to dox him because the doxing laws haven’t come into effect yet. But you have to do it in a way that it can’t be construed as, like, harassment of his family. Because he’s an idiot! Like this guy that was walking around trying to tear the masks off our guys, which is unlawful. You can’t do that’s assault. You can’t just walk up to someone and grab their face.

 

So we’re obviously going to have to follow up this with some more legal action. Not that it’s been very successful so far because the system is so corrupt. When we report the police for their criminal activities, like openly criminal activities, so far we’ve had one case going through pretty well, but the other cases are the Ombudsman just wrote back to me when I had my phone stolen by that cop, the Ombudsman said:

 

“Oh, we wouldn’t use those words to describe what happened.”

 

It’s like, it’s not theft? So I can just do that to people in the street, like. Anyway, crazy stuff!

 

But yeah, this guy, he’s got all his social media, like his family, like his wedding photos. We’ve got it all downloaded. We’ve got it all saved. Just working out how to legally post it all in a way that’s just maybe for comic purposes. I don’t know. We’ll work it out. He’s a fucking arsehole! Want to dox our boys, and then you’ve got, like, your missus and all your family and the house you bought all on social media. Fucking idiot!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, he was a scumbag. And for some reason, the undercover cops were bigger assholes than the regular cops.

 

Thomas Sewell: Because they were detectives. I’m pretty sure they were CT detectives.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: They just got a fucking pole up there arse! They think they can just behave however they want. They’re like the Stasi*, you know.

 

[* Stasi: Official state security service of the German Democratic Republic (East Germany) The Ministry for State Security, commonly known as the Stasi, was the state security service and secret police of East Germany from 1950 to 1990. The function of the Stasi in East Germany resembled that of the KGB in the Soviet Union, ⁠ in that it served to maintain state authority and the position of the ruling party, in this case the Socialist Unity Party of Germany. Wikipedia]

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah. That woman was particularly violent as well. That was a man and a woman. Both of them were very violent, for no reason. I thought when we were first getting pushed, they were just going to do the regular move on, which is obviously they just push while shouting “move”. But they went straight to pepper spraying. Yeah, they were very aggressive that day.

 

Joel Davis: But the fact that if there were CT detectives, they were probably in a command structure where Counter-Terrorism was issuing commands, they must have figured out or got wind that we were going to show up. And that probably explains, because when we did it the first time, there was not that many police there. And the police looked genuinely shocked and unprepared, and they just basically had to accept the fact that we were there and they didn’t aggress against us in any way. And they were very calm. Because I led the first rally as well. So they conferred with me as the non-masked person, and they were very calm and relatively reasonable to talk to that was not the case this time. So why would they behave differently unless they had maybe an inkling that we were coming?

 

Thomas Sewell: They would have had an inkling. I think if they knew for a fact we were coming, they would have had way more cops. But they were stretched so thin because there was that nigger concert on at the same time.

 

[1:13:44]

 

Joel Davis: I think they might have had an idea that we’re going to do something, but they didn’t know what. And they probably guessed that that was one of the possible things we would do.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, but also, it was the hundredth day anniversary of their fucking stink camp. And they would have assumed that because they’ve been demanding more police presence because some drunk, like, Aussies, like, threatened them as well. Like just randoms. So there would have been a lot more cops there. I think we caught them off guard, mostly. Those two, I don’t know if they’re CT detectives, but 100% they were detectives, but they were definitely from a more political command structure. What they were doing was they were trying to tear masks off. And then there was the protest. There’s like an Asian dude, Asian cop, who’s like, it’s his primary role to be on like a high quality digital camera that films all the protests. He’s at every single protest I’ve ever been at. It’s this like kind of stocky Asian cop. And he was basically trying to get an angle on us.

 

And then when the detectives were running around and aggressively pushing and shoving people in our ranks and trying to rip the masks down, he was trying to get an angle to try to get the faces. So it was kind of like a fishing operation. Both of them were working in unison.

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah. And the Leftists, they had two opportunities to attack us if they wanted to, as in start a melee, but they never take it. They always are just obsessed with gesticulating and pretending they’re fighting and they’re ready to fight. Like on the flank I was on where I was yelling, “what are you gonna fucking do?”, there was like this old Boomer with a flag, a CFMEU flag. Well, that was like full twirling it. Like, twirling it, like some sort of staff. You know, he’s got like a staff. He’s like a martial arts, …

 

Thomas Sewell: He was larping, he was larping.

 

Jacob Hersant: He was having fun, I’ll say that!

 

And obviously the guy with the makeshift key, knuckle dusters, like, they all shape up and they pretend they’re ready to fight. But there was no police at that point when we first made contact with the communists.

 

And at the same time, when we came around the second time around the street after being pepper sprayed, you can just see them all standing there going:

 

“Stay back, Nazi scum!”

 

They [chuckling] never do anything, but they, …

 

Joel Davis: There was one little dude having a soy rage that when we came right into the park and he must be like, I don’t know, five foot three, he’s a little, and he has the typical soy-jack physiognomy. And he was yelling out:

 

“Incels! You, incels!”

 

Like, with the most soy voice you’ve ever fucking heard! I’m like:

 

“Tell it to your fucking wife’s boyfriend, faggot!”

 

Like, he was like:

 

“Incels! Incels!”

 

Like, and then we just walk past and he’s:

 

“You weak little pussy incels!”

 

Joel Davis: And we just like, walk past and he’s just like, shivering!

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ve only had one Leftoid try to throw a punch at me since getting out of jail. And that was at the Stop Immigration rally, the one where we first met you, Joel, but you rocked up late. Like, you came afterwards, and we were marching off.

 

Joel Davis: I rocked up one time, but you guys had already been fucking pepper sprayed before the time. [laughing]

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, yeah, that’s right. That’s a good point. Yeah, because we got there so early. Yeah. So well, you rocked up after is probably the correct term. But, yeah, as we got moved on, we got a move on order, we had to leave. So as we were leaving, that’s when they started throwing shit at us. And I remember, like, something fucking big hit me in the knee, and then another thing hit me in the chest, and then there was a little bit of a melee that almost started.

 

And then this one guy, when we’re in the line, I remember he, like, came at and just did the most, like, ridiculous, like, haymaker, like, telegraphed, punched, and I kind of just leaned back and I had the megaphone in my hand, and I just booked him in the head with the megaphone. [chuckling] And he was like, it was really funny! It was completely comical! It was completely comical. He just did the biggest telegraph, haymaker.

 

And I was like:

 

“Oh, I’m gonna pull that one!”

 

And then just, boop with the megaphone.

 

It was like ACME* productions. And he didn’t come in for another punch after he got smacked in the head with the megaphone. I think that’s why the first megaphone is broken.

 

[* The ACME Corporation is a fictional corporation that features prominently in the Road Runner/Wile E. Coyote animated shorts as a running gag. The company manufactures outlandish products that fail or backfire catastrophically at the worst possible times. The name is also used as a generic title in many cartoons, especially those made by Warner Bros. And films, TV series, commercials and comic strips.]

 

Joel Davis: I’d rather cop a megaphone than a fist, to be honest. Megaphone is not that hard.

 

Thomas Sewell: I don’t know. It’s pretty sharp. Like, all the weight of the punch is just kind on the edge of the megaphone.

 

Joel Davis: I’ll keep that in mind!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, use the megaphone. The megaphone’s a good distancing weapon, you know?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah.

 

Jacob Hersant: They were gesticulating and they weren’t actually ready for a fight.

 

But then when the police attacked us, that’s when they were all cheering and jeering for it. They were all celebrating it, and they were following behind the cops going:

 

“Fuck you, Nazis! Yeah!”

 

[1:18:37]

 

Thomas Sewell: :

 

“We did it! Yeah! We did it!”

 

Jacob Hersant: Free advice for any political movement is just not to do that. It just makes you look really, really bad! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Particularly when you call yourself Anarcho-Communists. You were like:

 

“The police are all Nazis!”

 

And they were coming out on Twitter saying things like:

 

“Oh, it’s so good to see Nazis pepper spraying other Nazis!”

 

Or something. It’s such cope. Like, it’s insane cope! But I don’t want to fucus on the Leftists too much because I mean, they’re really irrelevant. What’s relevant is us. Like, we’re the main story. The only time they can ever get themselves on the news is if they hitch their wagon to like the pro-Palestinian thing or something. But none of their actual issues of substance are relevant to Australians. Like, average Australians don’t give a shit about what communists have to say about almost anything, but they are interested in what we have to say, for better or worse.

 

And I thought we made an excellent point, which is that, well, fuck off, we’re full!

 

But moreover the average Australian doesn’t sympathize with these fucking pajeet refugees! The entitlement is outrageous, absolutely outrageous! These people can barely speak English. They look fresh off the boat. They stunk! The average Australian does not want these people in our country. And like, some of them are from India. How the fuck are you a refugee from India?

 

And now the government is changing the laws. So if you claim that you’re a victim of domestic violence, you can claim refugee status. So what? The jeets come over here, bash the missus, the missus goes and complains, and now they all get to stay? That’s literally the law now. Or some of them, the guy will say that they’re a homosexual and they can’t be deported because they’ll get persecuted back in fucking Sri Lanka or wherever the fuck they’re from.

 

So they let him stay and then he then goes and brings the wife and kids over! Like, oh yeah, you’re a real homosexual! That’s why you got a wife and kid!

 

Thomas Sewell: And then he beats her and then the wife and kids get a stay. [laughing]

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah. [laughing]

 

Thomas Sewell: I mean, he’s a homosexual, misogynist, Muslim refugee. Yeah, pajeet refugee.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. It’s insane!

 

But a lot of people respected what we did, and I saw a lot of responses from, I want to go through actually some of these TikTok responses because some of them are actually quite good. Let me pull this up. I want to read some of them out to you.

 

So there was a clip uploaded to TikTok of part of the rally, I think, when we were singing the, “We never want to see your race again. No way! Get fucked! Fuck off!” And the comments are quite good. People saying:

 

“Finally, someone standing up for Australia. Love the sign!”

 

With those emojis that have the love hearts all over them:

 

“Love Aussies. Straight to the point!”

 

“Stay strong, fellas. Nice work!”

 

“At least someone is standing up for Australia properly. Well done. The government needed to study this and grow a set and make it happen for the voters!”

 

And this has 400 likes in the TikTok comment section:

 

“Good on you boys from Gazza!”

 

Gazza is like this Boomer with a huge White beard:

 

“Good on your boys!”

 

And 600 likes. We’re getting these sympathetic, like, patriotic Boomer types and, like moms, dads just average everyday Aussies that are just starting to love us because we keep hitting issues that they actually care about in ways that are obviously sympathetic. Like, we keep taking positions the average Aussie battler is on our side in that position, and then we just ram it down the throat of the system with our intensity.

 

And then they have to go and cry about:

 

“The Nazis. Someone put them in jail! Why aren’t the police arresting them?”

 

And apparently we’ve done the most heinous crime and:

 

“We don’t deserve to exist. We’re just total scum! We’re basically terrorists. And it’s just crazy that we’re getting away with it!”

 

Or something, apparently, just for holding a sign and marching around and saying slogans.

 

And we’re just kind of drawing through ju-jitsu the media and the government into a promotional campaign of just free promotion. Everyone fucking hates the media! Everyone hates the government and we’re just using them to promote us. And everyone who hates them who realises that they’re fucking anti-White, who realises that they don’t give a shit that the media and the establishment don’t give a shit about them and are working against them. Well, if they attacking us constantly and we’re constantly taking positions they agree with, they’re going to start loving us and they’re turning us into a relevant political force in Australia.

 

And I’ve said this many times before, if they just shut the fuck up and none of these politicians and none of these journalists had anything to say about us and they didn’t talk about us on the news we would be irrelevant, and it would be very difficult for us to grow in numbers and we would be unhappy. Like, we would actually be sad. Like, we love every time they do a hit piece on us.

 

And then that’s stupid that they keep giving us what we want. And then you’ll see some people in the comments:

 

“They’re just attention seekers. Why are you giving them attention? Like, this is what they want!”

 

And, yeah, it is what we want. Like, we’re doing publicity stunts. And they’re stupid enough to play along with it. Its hilarious!

 

Jacob Hersant: At the same time, they get something out of it, because we’re actually interesting.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

[1:23:59]

 

Jacob Hersant: Like, the refugee closing rally only became interesting because we showed up in black and made chants and sung songs. Like, otherwise it’s just boring. And they bring out the jeets that are complaining about us and they can barely string a sentence together:

 

“And they were here saying, Australia for White man!”

 

And it’s just boring and it’s embarrassing, and it would be completely irrelevant and uninteresting if it wasn’t in response to the black battalion showing up [chuckling] and having fun.

 

One thing I saw on the video that I posted about it, I saw someone concern trolling, and he’s saying:

 

“This is the optics grey area, where you want to appear peaceful, but you don’t, like, at the same time you’re getting attacked by the police, so you have to respond. It’s hard for you to decide.”

 

But I don’t think that. I think that’s more just kind of just an unreasonable complaint, or a bit of concern trolling, because the reality is no one expects you when some overzealous cop attacks your activists, no one expects you to pull out a gun and just dome them right there or something like that’s just insane!

 

Joel Davis: There’s the American retard. That was like:

 

“Oh, you Aussies. Like, this is what you deserve because you gave up your guns!”

 

I was like:

 

“So what? Like, we have gun rights and when the police attack us and we just pull out guns and have a shootout with the cops, like, that’s going to go down well. Like, let’s say we merc every cop, then what happens?”

 

Then they’re going to come and try and arrest us or what? We just constantly go to war with the police? And we just kill every police officer in the whole country?

 

Thomas Sewell: True Ned Kelly!

 

Joel Davis: Why haven’t you done that yet?

 

Jacob Hersant: Well, they expect us to do everything.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah.

 

Jacob Hersant: They want us to be the Kelly gang at war with the cops. But people don’t even see it that way. Like the public looks. People expect that you have a right to protest because they think we live in a democracy.

 

So we don’t necessarily have to behave super well, but we know practically we have to behave super well, but we can act a little bit silly and the public wouldn’t really care because they’re just like:

 

“You’re protesters.”

 

But it’s the police that actually are expected to behave fairly and to give everyone a fair go. They’re there to police the situation. And when they attack you, it makes them look bad. And if you’re disciplined, you looked good. There’s no issue with that. Like no one in the public is expecting you to pull out a knife and start stabbing police officers because they try to unmask you or something.