Sam Bamford: Hi, guys. Welcome back to the Two Worlds Collide podcast. On today’s episode, we have James and Joanna Howe.

 

Now, for the first, 205 minutes, we talk about Joanna’s pro-life Bill that she’s getting through Parliament in South Australia. And after that, we had a healthy debate about immigration and what it truly means to be Australian.

 

Now, this debate did get pretty heavy. It did get a bit nasty. But at the end of the day, we had enough respect for each other to sit there and debate, sometimes listen, sometimes get angry. But at the end of it, we all seemed to come together.

 

Because at the end of the day, if we can’t have debates like this, then who are we really? What are your thoughts? And there we go.

 

I’m at, like, 100—I think I’m at 102 now—episodes.

 

Joanna Howe: That’s good. They say if you survive after 100, you are more likely to keep going.

 

James Howe: I think 98% of people quit by their 25th episode or something. Yeah, I’m gonna keep forgetting that.

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah, yeah.

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah. Someone said something—I think it was… Who’s that guy? Chris Williamson. Chris Williams—maybe him.

 

James Howe: Yeah, I know the guy.

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah, he said something like 85% of podcasts don’t get past their episode 30. So, yeah. Anyway, my last podcast has picked up a bit of a stink with Australia.

 

Joanna Howe: Yep.

 

Sam Bamford: Everyone seems to bloody hate me. Well, no, they don’t hate me. They either— I mean, I’ve sold a lot of T‑shirts. But Joanna and James, welcome to the Two Worlds Collide podcast. How you guys going?

 

 

James Howe: Good, mate. Thanks for having us.

 

Sam Bamford: You’re welcome. Now we’re gonna get to stuff after about what we want Australia to be, what we want Australia to potentially look like—does that matter? And the basis of the argument will—probably not. The argument—Jesus, what are you thinking? You guys are coming in to argue. The base of the debate would be: What truly is an Australian? How you guys see it; how I see it. And we’ll go from there.

 

But first there’s more important stuff to get to, which is the Bill that you’re going to push through Parliament. And now that One Nation have got the balance of power, looks like this is going to happen. So, Joanna—

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah. Thanks so much for having me back, Sam.

 

Sam Bamford: You’re welcome.

 

Joanna Howe: I remember you said that if I was doing something, I could come back and we could talk about it, which I’m grateful for.

 

So we have legislation in the Parliament at the moment that seeks to ban abortion in the third trimester, so 25 weeks upward.

 

So at the moment it’s legal up until birth for any reason in South Australia, except for sex selection. What we’re seeking to do is now ban abortion after 25 weeks, except if it’s necessary to save the life of the mother. Now, we’ve got that in there just as something so that people can see that the mother’s life is valued and prioritised, but the reality is in a late‑term abortion, it’s never necessary to save the life of the mother. If the mother’s got pre‑eclampsia or some kind of risk to her life, what they will do is bring that baby out alive via an emergency Caesarean. So they won’t waste time on a time‑consuming late‑term abortion; they’ll just get that baby out alive through a C‑section in less than an hour.

 

Now, the process for a late‑term abortion—do you know what it is, Sam?

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah, you explained it to me last time and it ripped my heart away.

 

Joanna Howe: So I think last time I talked to you about, actually, a dilation and evacuation, which is when they wrench the arms and legs off a child—

 

Sam Bamford: Literally, like, rip them out!

 

Joanna Howe: But after 22 weeks, the process in South Australia is different. That’s actually a second‑trimester abortion method. The third‑trimester abortion method is you’ve literally got a psychopath looking at a baby on an ultrasound. And they have to look at the ultrasound because this next bit has to be very precise.

 

So they’re looking at a baby on an ultrasound. The mum’s under anaesthetic—she can’t feel this—but they’re locating the Left ventricle of the baby’s heart.

 

So they’re looking at a baby that’s sucking their thumb, playing in the womb, just hiccuping—all the things that babies do in the womb.

 

And then they locate the Left ventricle of the baby’s heart. They fill a needle up—a 20‑gauge needle—with potassium chloride, which is a poisonous substance. They use it on death row to kill rapists and murderers. And here they fill that needle up with approximately 10 millilitres of potassium chloride, KCL, and inject that into the Left ventricle of the baby’s heart. The baby goes from being alive to suddenly being tortured to death! It’s intended to induce a cardiac arrest. It causes excruciating pain.

 

And we know that because sometimes prisoners on death row have not been sedated first, and so they’ve actually lived to tell the tale of how horrifying this is, and so they now do get properly sedated. This doesn’t happen for babies in South Australia, and it happened to 105 babies older than 23 weeks and up until birth since abortion up to birth was introduced and enacted in July 2022.

 

So they inject the baby’s heart with poison. If it doesn’t kill them shortly thereafter, they’ll see that on the ultrasound and they will do a second injection.

 

So they’re just torturing this child to death, who eventually dies in the womb. Now, how do they get that dead baby out? Well, they give the mum labour‑inducing drugs and she goes through the process of labour—just like your wife did, just like I’ve done five times. And she delivers that baby intentionally stillborn. So she delivers—she has the contractions, she has the pushing—and she delivers a dead baby who, under South Australian law, can just get placed in the medical waste bin at 30–35 weeks.

 

[05:17]

 

Sam Bamford: So she’s still going through the same process?

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah, just—

 

Sam Bamford: Just giving birth to a dead baby.

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah. Yep.

 

And so we’re saying: Ban this barbaric procedure! It has no place in our modern healthcare system. It’s not pro‑women. Actually the data shows that women are often very traumatised and scarred by this. But evidently it kills a baby that would be alive today because they’re viable, they’re healthy. Seventy‑five percent of late‑term abortions kill healthy babies in South Australia.

 

So this is a really exciting new bill, and Sarah’s introduced it straight away—so people are still doing their maiden speeches and she’s put that Bill forward—because there isn’t any time to lose, because babies are dying in this state right up until birth. This is the first attempt now, in this term of Parliament, to try and take that back.

 

Sam Bamford: What did you say—100 over the last year?

 

Joanna Howe: A hundred and five in the last two and a half years. That’s one every couple of weeks. That’s late‑term abortions. But it’s actually 5,000 abortions a year in South Australia, so it’s a lot.

 

Sam Bamford: Now, you had a very different idea on abortion when you were younger.

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah.

 

Sam Bamford: And the man to my right, your left, changed it. Talk me through that.

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah, well, I liked him. I had a bit of a crush on him [chuckling] at the time, but he didn’t know that. And we would argue about a lot of things because I was a Leftist arch‑feminist. We would have gotten great, Sam, back when I was 20!

 

And so we would argue about a lot of these things, and then the topic of abortion came up. Now, I’ve told the story a lot, but why don’t you say what it was like from your perspective?

 

James Howe: Oh, I mean, you were just like this—like, just rabidly woke Indian chick [chuckling] that I happened to sort of happen to encounter. And we got into an argument about women in sport and you were trying to tell me that it was disgusting prejudice that women’s sport didn’t do as well as men’s sport.

 

And I remember just thinking, like:

 

“What the fuck are you talking about!”

 

The reason why women’s sport doesn’t do as well is because they’re not as good at it. Like, people watch sport—well, they watch men in sport—because men are the pinnacle of excellence in whatever sport you haven’t been watching.

 

So we kind of had that debate. And I just said:

 

“Look, I don’t care if you like it or not—men’s sport is always going to do well because people want to watch the absolute peak of ability in any given kind of physical field.”

 

Joanna Howe: And I found those arguments really annoying! He just thought he was better than me because he was a man.

 

But then I think when you look into it and you point out the things like Serena Williams plays the 20th‑best male player in the world and she loses six–love, six–love.

 

And so I think there is, clearly in evidence, a difference between women’s performance in the same sport as men’s, and people prefer—and they pay—to watch the men’s sport.

 

Sam Bamford: Well, I’d also just suggest as well, you just gotta look at the numbers and where the money flows to—people speak with their viewership.

 

James Howe: Sure. Yeah, exactly! Yeah. And I don’t want to be rude—like, I’m not saying that women’s sport doesn’t matter—but it’s really just not even about that. It’s not that I thought I was better than you. It’s also just that you, like, had a—you were defending a stupid ideology. So, like credit where it’s due. Like, it must have been rough being you know, let’s be honest.

 

And then we got onto abortion and you started saying:

 

“Oh, women have a right to have an abortion.”

 

And I think I just said:

 

“Well, like, what even is an abortion?”

 

And you’re like— it was almost like you’re like:

 

“I never really thought about it.”

 

Joanna Howe: Well, because I hadn’t. Because when you’re brainwashed by feminism, you just swallow the party line. You don’t necessarily—you don’t think through all these things. You’re just told what to think! You’re told what to think. I was an economics–law student at Sydney University when we met.

 

Sam Bamford: You know, well, that happens with a lot of us, right? With society—everything. Like, you get brainwashed soldiers, you get brainwashed Parliament members, you get brainwashed Leftists.

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah.

 

Sam Bamford: You get brainwashed people from the Right.

 

James Howe: Yeah. 100%.

 

Sam Bamford: Happens with everyone.

 

James Howe: Yeah, it does. And you can’t help it to some degree because you have to just learn some stuff in life. There’s too much information to do your own investigation about everything.

 

But ultimately, I do think it’s incumbent upon people to, when they’re presented with the evidence on an issue, to have the moral courage to actually grapple with it and find out where the truth is and to be willing to go with the truth!

 

Because I think, like, you can’t blame people for being brainwashed, but you can blame people for deciding to stay brainwashed. You know? And to your credit, after I pointed out to you, like:

 

“Well, okay, so it’s a baby after it gets born. What is it five minutes before it gets born?”

 

And you had absolutely no answer for it. Jo went—she was working for Bill Shorten at the time, who used to be the Labor leader, but he was the head of the Australian Workers’ Union—and he’d headhunted Jo to work for him two days a week because he said:

 

“I’ve never met anyone who is more hated by Labor Left than you.”

 

And I asked around and—

 

Joanna Howe: Because he was Labor Right?

 

James Howe: He was Labor Right, yeah, exactly!

 

Sam Bamford: I don’t get this stuff.

 

James Howe: Yeah, neither do I but anyway. And so she snuck into her office and shut the door and just Googled “aborted fetuses.” And some academic articles came up which had some photographs of aborted babies. And she could see that these were little people who’d just been sliced to pieces and ripped apart.

 

Sam Bamford: It genuinely affected me—our conversation. When we sat down, I remember sitting there, like, changing the diaper of my baby, like, an hour later, and I was like:

 

“Yeah, what the fuck’s going on here?”

 

Yeah, I genuinely—like, I was genuinely sitting there. I remember it was one of the only times I got teary on a podcast. I genuinely sat there and I was listening to this. I’m like:

 

“This is too much! We’re really doing this to babies, and everyone’s just going about their normal life.”

 

Yeah, it genuinely tore me up.

 

James Howe: Yeah, it’s horrible!

 

And the only reason it still happens is because people don’t talk about it. And the Left tries to silence you if you even raise it.

 

But it’s insane, man! Like, even last night we were just watching this movie, Knocked Up—

 

Sam Bamford: The old‑school one from—

 

James Howe: Yeah, same one. We’ve seen it before, but somehow we just found ourselves watching it again. And there’s the birth scene, and I’ve—like, each time we’ve had a baby and that baby comes out and starts crying, it just—it makes me teary, just because I’m like:

 

“Just the miracle of life!”

 

You just see—holy shit! There’s a person here on the scene. And I even had that experience just watching this movie last night. And I’m just thinking, man, that baby—it’s the same baby that was in there five minutes ago. It’s no different! It’s the same baby, so it can’t cry because its lungs are full of fluid.

 

But it’s the same baby. It’s capable of having all of the same experiences. It’s capable of having the same kind of sensations of pain. Same sort of comfort at the sound of its mother’s voice. Same child, same human being. And just the thought of killing that baby—it’s just murder like any other form of murder. And we just can’t tolerate it in a sane and civilised society. It’s just disgusting!

 

So, yeah—long story short!

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah. So I had to admit to him, maybe a fortnight later, that I’d changed my mind and that he was right and I was wrong.

 

Sam Bamford: It’s good, though. It shows you’re adaptable.

 

James Howe: Yeah.

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah.

 

James Howe: And she’s just had to do that again and again!

 

Joanna Howe: That’s [chuckling] not true! He’s had to—

 

James Howe: No, it’s gone the other way pretty much ever since, …

 

Joanna Howe: No, it hasn’t. But we’ve just—I guess— Yeah, we fell in love!

 

James Howe: On every personal argument, it’s had to go the other way.

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah. But I was a brainwashed Leftist and I’ve had to—I guess I’ve had to unpack all of the things I believed and realise which ones I still believe and which ones I still don’t. And that’s a journey that I would encourage other people to go on as well.

 

And if you are in South Australia, or even if you’re not, I encourage you to fly in for our rally on June 17 outside the South Australian Parliament, because that’s when we will be rallying and protesting for this bill. And I do think for these babies—after 25 weeks—we’re up against it. All of the peak medical bodies are against us; all of the media establishment; the Labor and the Greens like it; some of the Liberal Party, even.

 

And so you’re really up against it. But if we pass this bill, that’ll be the first pro‑life Bill to pass a House of Parliament in Australian history. But it’ll also be the first socially conservative Bill to have passed the South Australian Parliament—in history. So it’s big. And we do need—like, the Left is so good at turning up for evil. And our side, we’re just useless a lot of the time!

 

Sam Bamford: Because we’re all busy working.

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah, [chuckling] but this is after work. It’s 5:30 PM in the city. And so—

 

Sam Bamford: Well, most people have kids. Conservative families have kids.

 

Joanna Howe: Well, bring your kids. We bring our kids. Like, sorry, Sam, there’s not an excuse you can throw to me other than if you’re in Labor. If you’re in Labor or you’re dead, you don’t get to come. But you don’t have to come—you getta leave pass. But everybody else—like, these babies have no voice other than us.

 

And so if we don’t turn up, then the politicians just know we don’t care.

 

Sam Bamford: Yep.

 

Okay, so when is it again?

 

Joanna Howe: 17th of June. Tuesday, 5:30 PM to 6:30 PM, outside the SA Parliament, the City—North Terrace. Yeah. Really hope you can come by. Hope other people can come, too. It is really important. We bring our—we’ve got a six‑year‑old—and we’ve been bringing the kids to these things since they were just out of the womb—like, a couple of months old, three years old, four years old. They have to know what they’re up against in this society, in this culture. I think it’s important to raise them educated and awake.

 

[15:18]

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah, definitely! Because the other side is doing it as well.

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah.

 

Sam Bamford: But the thing with the other side is they’ve got—they seem to have—kindergarten, schools and universities to do that. As well, that’s why you asked me on the way in:

 

“Are you gonna home‑school?”

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah.

 

Sam Bamford: Did you ask me that question because—you know—because you’re know, …

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah, you’re awake. And I guess in the public education system in South Australia, you’re being taught the gender bred person. You’re celebrating—you’re told to dress up in purple for IDAHOBIT Day. You know, so there’s all these trans ideologies, …

 

James Howe: It’s about trans—and yeah, I don’t know what it’s about.

 

Sam Bamford: Are you saying I’m short?

 

James Howe: No, I was just looking at your hairy feet.

 

Joanna Howe: If you send your kid to a public school, they’re gonna come out indoctrinated by this.

 

And so then, yeah, we had to try pretty hard to find a school where this sort of BS wasn’t happening.

 

Sam Bamford: Well, it’s also happening everywhere now because the government can’t even define a woman.

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah.

 

Sam Bamford: I did a post about this the other day, right? And I sat down before I did the post—I’m like:

 

“What am I going to talk about here?”

 

And there was a clear thing there that I came up with: If you can’t define something, you can’t defend it. It’s like the “what is a woman” argument, you know what I mean? Like, same with the baby thing.

 

Like, if you just think that a baby, like you were saying before, isn’t the same baby when it’s born five minutes after, then you can’t define what that is, so then you can’t defend what that is.

 

And, I mean, the government at the moment—they do not have the capability to be able to control your economy that’s over a trillion dollars, while sitting there and telling us they can’t define a woman. Like, how are we supposed to defend women? How are we supposed to defend their rights, their spaces and their sports? And it’s good to see, actually, that although the Liberal Party for over a decade were in power after Julia Gillard—that stupid lady—decided to change the legislation around the definition of a woman, that they’ve finally come out and spoken out against it.

 

Do you think this will ever happen mainstream with abortions—fully?

 

Joanna Howe: Yep. Yeah.

 

Sam Bamford: Truly believe that?

 

Joanna Howe: No, I truly believe it.

 

So I think if you look at anything, like how slavery was overcome or any kind of injustice, you’ll find that initially the people that are jumping up and down about it are seen as extremists and everything’s done to kind of attack them and marginalise them.

 

But eventually it becomes mainstream. So, 10 years ago—like Sal Grover—right now every conservative politician in the country is trying to get her for a photo shoot, and they’re tweeting about it.

 

Sam Bamford: I need to reach out to her to get her on the pod.

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah, but everyone’s doing it. But five years ago that wasn’t the case—10 years ago, you know, it was even more not the case—at the time when Julia Gillard changed the, …

 

Sam Bamford: I remember a couple of years ago they got her on—what’s that stupid show where that W‑lead dude was on, …

 

Joanna Howe: The Project. Channel 7. The Project.

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah. And they tried to grill her a year ago, but now it’s like:

 

“Whoa! We’ve changed! Yeah, we have. Changed!”

 

Joanna Howe: No, things have changed. People are awake. The One Nation vote is surging. So people can—even the mainstream media can see things are shifting. People aren’t listening to them anymore. They’re now trying to come along to the party. Like, we’ve even noticed—in the coverage of our abortion issue—they have changed somewhat from being openly hostile to now almost being fair in the coverage we had last week on the announcement of the bill.

 

So I believe that on abortion this will happen. It takes time. But if you just think about—like, two years ago, we were at the Olympics and you’ve got a male boxer punching on a female in the women’s division and then getting gold.

 

But then Trump gets elected, does an Executive Order, that biology is the basis of male and female. The Olympic Committee’s now changed its tune and said they’re going to be checking birth certificates and doing tests to make sure that female sport is for women—biological females—only. So things take time. And in Australia we are quite behind—like, behind whether you can—three to four years.

 

So I think on abortion the fundamentals are there. This is a child in the womb who’s a human being. If you’re on the side of abortion, you support killing human beings. We’ll eventually catch up. We’ll eventually get there. It just takes time.

 

Sam Bamford: And how many babies do we abort in Australia per year?

 

Joanna Howe: So, close to 100,000. The most recent data suggests 88,000. But that data is a bit old.

 

And so it’s a lot. We talk about a migration, a population crisis and a fertility crisis, but part of that crisis is that we’re killing so many babies and we’re not replacing our population.

 

Sam Bamford: Yes—which is where my main argument comes in, right? Where we’re importing two, three migrants per birth in this country. Our birth rate is at one point—if it goes below 1.4, that’s generally, like, an extinction‑level event. And I guess this is where my glaring argument has come out over the past few days about stuff. But I don’t want to get to that yet. I want to stay on your stuff.

 

So, what’s your next step after this Bill passes in the SA Parliament?

 

[20:02]

 

Joanna Howe: Okay, so to get it through to law, it has to pass in the Upper House and the Lower House. We think we’ve got the numbers for the first time to pass it in the Upper House.

 

Sam Bamford: Is that because of the One Nation—

 

Joanna Howe: Yep. And so that’s really significant!

 

But then to get it through the Lower House, which Labor runs, that’s going to be tough.

 

But having said that, their MPs are now going to be forced, for the first time, to put on the record their support for killing babies after 25 weeks. Literally, they’ll have to say:

 

“We’re on the side of injecting these babies with poison into their hearts.”

 

Now, many of those MPs live in electorates where the people would not be with them on such an extremist position.

 

And so I think it’s going to be interesting. I think we’ll have a mountain to climb to get it through the Lower House. But I think we could. When they sold abortion up to birth in South Australia, they stood on the steps with this sign that said “decriminalisation”.

 

And so the lie that they sold was that we need this new law because we need to stop women going to jail. But no women had been jailed for abortion in anyone’s memory—like, that just had not happened. It was a total lie! What they were really doing was removing all upper gestational limits on abortion so that it could be available up until birth and for any reason.

 

So the good thing about this campaign is, for the first time, we can now have this debate on our own terms and we can say:

 

“Are you on the side of killing babies older than 25 weeks, or are you not?”

 

And if you are on that side—of killing babies older than 25 weeks—then you’re really an extreme person! Like, you’re a murderer. There’s no other way to describe it, because you support injecting that baby with poison and then delivering them dead when you could just induce that baby early, deliver them alive and place them for adoption. Like, you could do those babies have to come out. They either come out dead or they come out alive. You guys are on the side of bringing them out dead! And so I think having that debate publicly is really significant!

 

But then beyond that, once you have that debate—and whether we pass that law or we don’t—we keep having those debates then. Because I think, as James said to me when we were debating this when I was 21, was:

 

“Well, what’s the difference between a baby five minutes before birth and five minutes after?”

 

I guess I would say to people:

 

“Well, what’s the difference between a 24‑week‑old baby and a 25‑week‑old baby, or a 20‑week and a 25‑week—and so on and so on—that they are human from conception. And at any point in human history when we’ve taken human rights away from a group of humans, it’s always ended in a pretty bad place.”

 

Sam Bamford: But what about the right of the baby in the womb?

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah—

 

Sam Bamford: Like, what about their right of living? I know you’re talking about taking away the rights of someone else, but the right of that baby when they’re conceived?

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah. I would argue they have human rights because they’re human beings.

 

Sam Bamford: 100%.

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah. And so, even from the moment of fertilisation, you have a new and distinct human person that is created and, if left alone, will develop and grow and contribute to our society.

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah. And this is where—this is where we’ll probably flow into the argument of immigration as well. Like, we—I always talk about importing the next generation when I’m sitting here and we’re aborting the next generation!

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah, yeah.

 

Sam Bamford: We wouldn’t need high levels of immigration if we didn’t abort the next generation*.

 

[* The promotion of abortion fits in with the anti-White agenda that is pushed throughout the West by (((those))) that hate Whites and want to get rid of us by all means possible.]

 

Joanna Howe: Twenty‑eight percent of Gen Z is aborted.

 

Sam Bamford: What?

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah, 28%! So we are—because it’s one, …

 

Sam Bamford: Over one in four!

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah, because it’s the most unsafe place for a child to be, it’s not like on the playground unsupervised and a paedophile might come and grab him. It’s actually just in the womb. Like, that’s— we just—we are killing babies for any reason in this country. And yeah, it has to stop! This is the West—the West is doing this.

 

And so they’re importing—we’re importing—people and we’re killing our own babies. And it is having massive cultural disruption.

 

Sam Bamford: It’s even having the most massive cultural disruption now that people are, for the first time in history—and this is where we spoke about the other night—we’re debating between what’s an “Australian.” Like, this is a cultural division now that immigration is causing. I wouldn’t be having this argument if I was—five years ago—and, like, immigration wasn’t so high, right? No one had these arguments.

 

So before we have a discussion about this, I just want to say that the people that are doing this to us is the Labor government—through high levels of immigration, through their unsafe practices of immigration, through their terrible laws of aborting babies.

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah.

 

Sam Bamford: And now they’re making people on the Right jump and fight and disagree with each other, which is healthy to have debate. But we’re at a point now where—what I’m trying to say is—everything’s been pushed down to us by this Leftist, communist government that are trying to replace us in our own country, and they’re actually allowing the abortion of the next generation coming through.

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah.

 

So I would say abortion up to birth, radical trans ideology in classrooms, the eSafety Commissioner, the erosion of freedom of speech, and the migration mess that we find ourselves in—I think it’s a both‑sides issue. So I recognise that Labor is far worse than the Libs! But the migration blowout that’s happened since 1996 until the present day—that is a both‑sides issue.

 

And it’s only now that we’ve seen Pauline Hanson kind of force it open and that—and she somehow managed to break through since Bondi in a way that she wasn’t able to beforehand. Australians are awake now, or they’re awakening.

 

And now you see Angus Taylor and the Libs talk about:

 

“Well, we need a values test; we need a clampdown on mass migration.”

 

But they weren’t saying this before. I’ve worked with both governments, in my position as a researcher at Adelaide Uni in migration research. They both have always been on the side of a “big Australia”. And it’s only Pauline Hanson who’s consistently said, from her maiden speech in the ’90s, that if we have immigration, we need to have integration and assimilation, and the programme needs to be managed in a coherent way. Yeah.

 

[25:39]

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah, I’m sort of going one step further than her and saying—and this is where my argument is— like, I think Australians—let’s say your Anglo‑Celtic and/or Indigenous Australians— where we’re being replaced at a rate that is glaringly obvious! Right? I’m walking around, I’m seeing different cultures everywhere, where five years ago we didn’t really see that.

 

And my sort of argument at the moment is that there are so many people coming in at such a rapid rate. And the government are telling us that all these people are “Australian”. And I’m sitting back and I’m being like:

 

“Well, no! They’ve been here since breakfast! They can’t just be Australian if they’ve been here such a short time.”

 

Someone like yourself—this is where the debate is, right? Like, are you Australian? When did you come here?

 

Joanna Howe: So it would have been 1988.

 

Sam Bamford: 1988. How old?

 

Joanna Howe: I was about four years old. And my dad, … So this was before we introduced temporary work visas. We only had permanent work visas. So we came as permanent residents.

 

There was an IT need. My dad was highly skilled. He was able to bring over his wife and his three children. We settled in suburban Sydney, bought a house, made it our home. He actually died six months after. We didn’t get booted back because he was no longer able to do that job. We stayed because we were all permanent residents by that point. And we’ve made Australia our home. You know, we’ve got five children.

 

I guess—in our last conversation—I asked you:

 

“Do you think I’m Australian?”

 

And recently I’ve been seeing on X that your position on that has changed somewhat. Yeah—why have you changed your position? And what would be your answer now to that question? Am I Australian?

 

Sam Bamford: No—not ethnically. Values, culturally wise—this is where the argument is because there’s so many people like you that have come in, and you’ve come in when Anglo‑Celtic and/or Indigenous Australians have been the overwhelming majority. So you’ve been able to come in and assimilate to our culture pretty easily, and you’ve sort of left your culture at the door.

 

Now, the reason I’ve changed recently is because I’ve sort of done a lot of inner thinking, I’ve done a lot of reading, reviewing, and I think that if we can’t define something, we can’t defend it! And I purely think that Australia isn’t Australia without the Australian people. Just like Japan: Japan’s not Japan because it sits on the island of Japan; Japan’s Japan because of the Japanese people.

 

And I think that the culture comes from the people. And that if we replace the people, we replace Australia. And Australia then is some, …

 

James Howe: True.

 

Sam Bamford: Fluid—or some non‑binary, whatever it is—and it can just be changed. And I don’t want that change.

 

James Howe: You have to define what Australia is. But at the same time, we’re talking about her—who has everything that a White Australian would have, except for the colour of her skin. Would you agree with that?

 

Sam Bamford: Like, 100%.

 

James Howe: Yeah.

 

Sam Bamford: Completely came into this culture, completely adapted, and would arguably probably be doing more for Australia than anyone else in the history of Australia, given the [anti-abortion] Bill that she’s about to pass.

 

James Howe: Yeah. So we’re talking about Whiteness then, at the end of the day—not culture per se—because culture—that would just cancel out the culture issue, because culture’s the same. So we can just tick that off the list. We share that—share the same culture. So the only thing that you and I would not share with her would be her skin colour*.

 

[* Skin colour is just an obvious sign of racial difference, which are extensive including personality, temperament, general intelligence, propensity for violence, etc. Racial differences are not just skin deep, they are to the bone. And different racial groups have different cultures because of these innate racial differences.]

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah. Okay. So what built this nation then, from 1901 all the way up until 2001?

 

James Howe: White people! Yeah. So—hang on. Just to understand, though—you would say your ability to call yourself Australian would be that you share the same skin colour as the people who built the country?

 

Sam Bamford: Same origins. Anglo‑Celtic.

 

James Howe: Anglo‑Celtic, though—but that’s specific to the British Isles.

 

Sam Bamford: So who were the people that formed government?

 

James Howe: The Brits. So—but what I’m saying is, what’s your heritage?

 

[30:06]

 

 

Sam Bamford: So both of my family originated from the UK.

 

James Howe: So you’re Anglo‑Celtic.

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah. I think Dad’s family came here very early 1900s.

 

James Howe: Yeah.

 

Sam Bamford: Mum’s was a little different—maybe around the war.

 

James Howe: Okay.

 

Sam Bamford: First or second? I don’t really know.

 

James Howe: Okay. But I find it hard to believe that—just tell me if I’m putting words in your mouth, I don’t want to misrepresent your position. But I find it hard to believe that you would qualify her Australianness based on her skin colour or her Indian heritage, but that you would look at a guy who is like me—say, for example. Now, it just so happens that I have Irish blood, so I am technically half Anglo‑Celtic, but my other half comes from Holland. Imagine if both of my ancestors were from Holland. But I’m still just sitting here in front of you talking with an Australian accent.

 

Sam Bamford: Yes. I like to always say as well, that the Anglo‑Celtic and/or European culture—because I think that’s what we’re built off. So Anglo‑Celtic, European culture.

 

A lot of people don’t think that. A lot of people just say Anglo‑Celtic. But I’ve been very upfront, in some of the stuff I put out on Twitter, saying Anglo‑Celtic, European, and Indigenous culture. Because I believe that’s what built us from 1901 all the way until—let’s say— When did mass, …

 

Joanna Howe: ’75. So ’75 was when the Racial Discrimination Act was passed. And then we officially developed a non‑discriminatory migration program. And then, in terms of mass immigration, it’s been growing since 1996 and it really took off in the 2000s.

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah, yeah.

 

Joanna Howe: And then post‑COVID, it’s been on steroids.

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah. And that’s where my sort of argument is, because, …

 

James Howe: But would you say that indigenous people built the country?

 

Sam Bamford: No! This is my argument with indigenous people. They had the land before we built all the shit! So they had the land; we built it; now we share it.

 

James Howe: Yeah, but Australia is about the people and the culture, not about the land. So just because they happen to be on the same geographical parcel of land, how does that mean that they’re Australian? Because she’s on the land too. But you would say she’s not.

 

Sam Bamford: No, she didn’t forge the land from 1901 all the way up until mass immigration.

 

James Howe: No, but neither did indigenous people. They just happened to be here, just like she happens to be here.

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah, but they were here. They definitely were here. And they did forge, …

 

James Howe: They were here but they didn’t do anything to build it. I mean, they did a little bit, but no more than, say, an Afghan camel herder might have done, and various other ethnicities.

 

Sam Bamford: I think they’re definitely a part of the people and the culture which has shaped this country.

 

Joanna Howe: But the Westminster, … James is not denying that. But if you’re thinking about the institutions that the Brits brought over the Westminster system of government, the courts, separation of powers—all of that’s come from a Judeo‑Christian foundation from the British Empire.

 

Sam Bamford: Christian foundation—not Judeo‑Christian! Christian foundation. I think we’ve got to be clear.

 

Joanna Howe: We can acknowledge that.

 

James Howe: Yeah, but, like, I would say that Aboriginal people had a small—a very small—role to play in building modern Australia, but so did some other races as well. Like, Afghan people helped to open up the interior. Chinese people helped to build the railways and whatever. So, yes, they had a small role, but by that same token you would also extend that to other cultures.

 

Sam Bamford: So do you think anyone can be Australian then?

 

James Howe: No, I feel like in order to be consistent in your position, you should also say that Aboriginal people are not Australian—and that wouldn’t be new. Like, that was the position up until recently.

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah, so they’re indigenous Australians.

 

James Howe: Yeah, but they weren’t considered to be full Australians until the ’60s. Now, I believe that they are, but I’m the guy who doesn’t base things on race.

 

Sam Bamford: So would Joanna be Indian‑Australian then?

 

James Howe: You don’t have to say Indian‑Australian anymore than, …

 

Sam Bamford: We’re calling indigenous people “indigenous-Australians”.

 

James Howe: I would just call them Australians. And they can call themselves indigenous if they want to. She can call herself Indian if she wants to. It’s up to her. Like, I’m half Dutch—I don’t call myself a Dutch-Australian. I think that’s just on the individual; they can choose what—

 

Joanna Howe: But I also think if you come here, you actually should identify as this country.

 

So if you come here and you become a citizen of this country—you’re lucky enough to get that—we’re Australian! Like, people have been asking me on Twitter:

 

“Who do you support in the cricket? Who would you support in a war, if India—?”

 

Sam Bamford: I literally saw one and someone was like:

 

“This will end the argument. Who do you follow in cricket, India or Australia?”

 

And they’re like:

 

“If she says whoever, then she’s that!”

 

James Howe: Well, she doesn’t even know what cricket is—

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah, I don’t [chuckling] watch the cricket, but if I were to follow a team, it would be the Australian team. Like, in the Olympics or whatever. And if we’re at war, it would be Australia. I’ve only been to India once. And at home, the only language that was ever spoken other than English was Portuguese, because my mum and my grandmother, maternal side, speak it. I don’t—because I never spoke it. So we learnt English from day dot. Because I was born in England.

 

I think I do have a problem with the “ethnically Australian” thing that you’re banging on about now.

 

Sam Bamford: So what is it?

 

Joanna Howe: Well, because I don’t think it’s intellectually rigorous as a concept. Like, what is an “ethnic Australian”?

 

Sam Bamford: Anglo‑Celtic and or European, indigenous Australian. Because there’s a difference between “ethnic Australian” and then “Australian citizen.” The problem is now, if we cannot define what this is, then we cannot defend the massive flood coming in. Because Anthony Albanese [Aussie Labor PM] just keeps telling us that:

 

“Oh, these are people, are all Australian because their boots hit our shores.”

 

Joanna Howe: Okay, so we all agree, …

 

James Howe: We all agree that that’s bullshit, though. That’s not the question that’s under debate.

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah, we all agree that that’s bullshit!

 

Sam Bamford: So would you agree that if you can’t define that, then you can’t defend that.

 

James Howe: I agree but, …

 

Sam Bamford: Because by everyone’s logic, everyone should just be able to be put into Australia.

 

James Howe: We are not arguing on whether we should define it. We all agree that we should define it. What we’re arguing about is your definition of it.

 

Sam Bamford: Okay, so what is your definition?

 

James Howe: Well, first, let me ask you a question.

 

Sam Bamford: No, no, no—you give me your definition. What’s your definition of an Australian?

 

James Howe: Well, I don’t necessarily have a coherent one. I’ve been thinking about it ever since this first came up. It’s not something I’ve given that much thought to. I think I don’t need to provide a perfect definition of what I think an Australian is in order to try and prove that yours is wrong. Do you understand? Like, I can, …

 

Sam Bamford: Should we both have a base‑level argument of what an Australian is to be able to prove what it isn’t?

 

James Howe: No—because we should, …

 

Sam Bamford: No, no—that’s how you start a debate. You can’t just come out and be like:

 

“Okay, this is your argument. I’m going to pick it to pieces.”

 

But you don’t even give me your definition of “Australian,”. So you have to give me a definition of “Australian”.

 

James Howe: No—don’t— Let me explain.

 

Sam Bamford: Well, then what are we doing here then, dude? If you’re not going to define what an Australian is—what are we doing here?

 

James Howe: Just let me finish.

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah.

 

James Howe: Okay. If we find—say, like, we’re out digging a hole, right? We both dig a hole and we come across a large bone, okay? Now, if you say this bone came from, say a giant flying fairy, I can actually say:

 

“That’s not the case.”

 

And then you say:

 

“Well, what do you think it came from?”

 

And I go:

 

“I don’t fucking know! I just know it’s not from a giant flying fairy, because that’s a dumb theory.”

 

So—just me not having a coherent theory of my own—I try to be intellectually honest. I’m not going to sit here and go:

 

“Oh, well, here’s what I think.”

 

When I don’t know what I think yet. It’s hard to come up with this stuff. Okay. I agree with you that when people’s boots first land on the land, they’re not Australian straight away. I also don’t know if I think citizenship is the moment that that happens—although it could be, or maybe it happens sometime afterwards. It’s a vague line. I don’t know. It’s complicated!

 

It’s a little bit like when you start work at a new workplace. Right? At first, it’s a little bit awkward and you’ve got to, kind of, like—you’ve got to be a little bit submissive to the other people who’ve been there for 20 years, you know what I mean? But at some point you do become a true, like, fully fledged member of that company, you know what I mean? There is a point there and it’s a bit vague—like, it’s not necessarily super‑easy to nail down when that happens.

 

But I’m telling you this—I’m telling you this: If there’s one guy there who goes, you’ve both been there for 20 years, but this guy keeps on telling you that his grandfather started the company and therefore he has rights that you don’t have—you’re going to tell him to go get fucked, because it’s annoying, you know what I mean? Like, you’re like:

 

“We’ve both been here—we’ve both contributed—so shut the fuck up about your grandfather! I actually couldn’t give a shit!”

 

Sam Bamford: You’re getting angry that I’m calling your wife a non‑Australia.

 

James Howe: Oh, well, I’m not getting angry about that. I’m angry about—yeah, like, I’m angry at the theory because it’s stupid! Sorry—no offence. I think it’s dumb!

 

Look, let me ask you this question. Would you accept responsibility for White treatment of Aboriginal people in Australia if someone said:

 

“You’re a White guy, you should feel ashamed of yourself for the treatment of Aboriginal people!”

 

Sam Bamford: Not at all!

 

James Howe: Why? Explain.

 

Sam Bamford: Because it’s got nothing to do with me.

 

James Howe: Why?

 

Sam Bamford: Personally, I’ve done nothing to them.

 

James Howe: So then how come— all right, so you want to—as a White guy—you want to take the credit for building this country, but you want to reject all of the responsibility for anything negative that happened.

 

Sam Bamford: No, I’ve never said that.

 

James Howe: You want all of the rights but none of the responsibility! No, no, no—but do you understand the point that I’m getting at?

 

Sam Bamford: Okay, like—so do you think that I can just go to Japan, get a Japanese citizenship and then become Japanese? Is that what we’re saying?

 

James Howe: No, because—

 

Sam Bamford: Because there are definitions around this that we need to have a really tough stance on, and be like:

 

“Well, this is an Australian, and if we can’t define it, we can’t defend it.”

 

The same thing with the “what is a woman” argument. If we can’t define a woman, we can’t defend women. So if we can’t define Australian, …

 

James Howe: Dude, the way you’re defining an Australian is pretty much, bloody, the same as the Left’s definition of a woman!

 

Sam Bamford: How! How?

 

James Howe: Because you’re going all on superficial appearance*. The Left will define a woman as anything that looks kind of like a woman. You define an Australian as someone that you think looks kind of like an Australian. It’s the same shit!

 

[* Again racial differences are both superficial and deep.]

 

Sam Bamford: What, and demographics don’t matter? What, demographics don’t matter?

 

James Howe: I’m not saying, …

 

Sam Bamford: So you are literally saying that if we got 30 million Arabs here tomorrow—brought them all—and then just said they just adapted to our way of life for the next 15 years, that they’re all just Australian?

 

[40:04]

 

 

James Howe: Could be. You don’t know what that looks like.

 

Sam Bamford: You just said 30 million Arabs could be Australian if they came here tomorrow and adapted to our way of life over fifteen years!

 

Joanna Howe: Adapting to our way of life.

 

Sam Bamford: They could be. And then we just demographically change Australia, and we’re all just sitting here going:

 

“Yeah, that’s all right!”

 

Joanna Howe: Well, Italy might be an interesting case study for that.

 

James Howe: Well, hang on—you just brought up Japan. Okay. I think that Japan is a case that people always bring up because it’s, like demographically it’s just one race of people.

 

Sam Bamford: Or we could bring up India or whatever, if you want.

 

James Howe: Well, why don’t you bring up Russia?

 

Sam Bamford: We could bring up Africa.

 

James Howe: Why don’t you bring up Russia, right? Because you’ve got Sámi reindeer herders in the north; you’ve got, like, White people in the middle; you’ve got people that look Chinese down the bottom. You’ve got a whole range of different people.

 

But the other thing is, people always bring up Japan and say:

 

“Well, they don’t let people move into their country.”

 

It’s like the Japanese are pretty fucking bigoted! Like, they’re pretty racist and they’re a bunch of psychos! Like—no offence if there’s any Japanese listening—but I don’t have that much respect for Japanese culture. If you read about what happened in World War II, it was absolutely freaking horrific, man! They marched into China—into Nanjing—and they slaughtered 300,000 people*; they put 200,000 women into prostitution. No, but seriously-we don’t take cues from Japan!

 

[* This is highly disputed regarding the number and what actually happened. The Chinese themselves had no issue with killing millions of fellow Chinese during the early communist years.]

 

Sam Bamford: Like, yeah, but I’m not saying that. Yeah. So, like, you’re happily just sitting here saying:

 

“Yeah, you would gladly just watch Australians be demographically replaced in our own country because we’re not willing to sit here and define it.”

 

Like, this is the problem!

 

James Howe: I don’t think you’re defining it any more than I am. You just said it’s a White person.

 

Sam Bamford: Okay, you haven’t even—I have not said it’s just a white person. Stop trying to put words into my mouth! This is what you’re trying to do. You’re trying to sit here and just say:

 

“He wants a white only Australia!”

 

Like they all try and sit out there and do—they all try and sit there and say that:

 

“You just want a White Australia!”

 

So you can pin me up as some type of Nazi. It’s pissing me off! And you’ve been sitting here doing it for the last 10 minutes, mate!

 

James Howe: Well, that’s because I think that you are, …

 

Sam Bamford: Do you think I’m a Nazi?

 

James Howe: I think you’ve got an ideology that’s on the Nazi spectrum.

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah—for protecting Australia. For saying that Anglo‑Celtic, European and/or Indigenous Australians are, in my opinion, Australian. You think that is a Nazi? You think that ideology is being a Nazi?

 

James Howe: No, I don’t think you’re being a Nazi, but, …

 

Sam Bamford: No, no—you think that ideology is being a Nazi?

 

James Howe: Are you gonna let me talk?

 

Sam Bamford: No, you, …

 

James Howe: You’re asking me questions—every time I try and answer, …

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah, well, you sit over there, sitting over me, trying to talk over me, weren’t you?

 

Joanna Howe: Okay, guys, …

 

James Howe: Don’t say:

 

“Okay, guys.”

 

I’m trying to answer your questions, but you’re not letting me answer.

 

Sam Bamford: You can’t even define an Australian, bro. What is an Australian? What is an Australian?

 

Joanna Howe: You’re changing, …

 

James Howe: Okay—no, shut up! You need to define what an Australian is.

 

Sam Bamford: How many times have I done it? I’ve done it four times now! An Australian is an Anglo‑Celtic, European and/or indigenous‑descent person. That’s what I think—demographically, …

 

James Howe: So, a white person! So then you say—

 

Sam Bamford: I literally said European. “European” covers, like, Italy, Greek—the majority of Europe—because a lot of people migrated from Europe.

 

James Howe: Okay.

 

Sam Bamford: And then indigenous Australians. Indigenous Australians are brown!

 

James Howe: Okay. White people and indigenous Australians.

 

Sam Bamford: Indigenous Australians are brown! *

 

[* Unless there are freebies being handed out, then they can be blue-eyed Whites, with hundreds of thousands popping up!]

 

James Howe: Okay. So if someone comes—she’s been here for 20 years— If someone comes over from Europe 20 years ago and speaks with a broad Australian accent, then they just—purely because of their race—they’re an Australian, in your view. So, you asked me:

 

“Do I think that’s Nazi?”

 

Well, it’s not Nazi because you’re not talking about gassing jews* or whatever.

 

But it’s like a racist ideology!

 

[* As revisionists have conclusively proven there was zero gassing of jews by the Germans. It’s diabolical black “racist” propaganda against Germans and Whites in general. See the many links to this issue below.]

 

Sam Bamford: Okay, I’m happy to be called “racist” then.

 

James Howe: I’m not calling you racist—it’s the definition of the word!

 

Sam Bamford: Okay, well, I am happy to have a racist ideology then. That’s fine.

 

James Howe: Fine. It’s up to you. I don’t really care. But if you’re asking my opinion, that’s my opinion.

 

Sam Bamford: Okay, so what is an Australian?

 

James Howe: I already explained. I don’t, …

 

Sam Bamford: Can’t answer it!

 

James Howe: No—don’t do this podcasty thing. It’s annoying!

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah.

 

Sam Bamford: What is an Australian?

 

Joanna Howe: In my view, an Australian is someone who comes here—because everybody came here. Right?

 

Sam Bamford: Yep.

 

Sam Bamford: So—even the Brits that came here—they’re ethnically British. Like, your parents are ethnically British, right? Like—you talking about “ethnically Australian” — I’m not sure that there is such a concept, Scot.

 

Sam Bamford: Sam.

 

Joanna Howe: Sorry, Sam. [chuckling] I think I’m talking to Scot.

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah, yeah.

 

Joanna Howe: But I think that—because I’ve had a lot of these arguments with him, too.

 

But I think one of the issues is—like, and this might be why James is positing that this is a racist position for you to take—is because you’re happy to include all the people—like, you’ve got indigenous Australians in there—but it doesn’t actually make sense with your— If your definition is “the people that build the institutions that make the country what it is” —that wasn’t indigenous Australians. That was, …

 

Sam Bamford: Oh, no, no, no—it wasn’t. But we sort of took the land off them.

 

Joanna Howe: So I feel—yeah—so I feel like you’re including them in because you sort of feel like you have to.

 

But at the end of the day, your position says that if you have brown skin like me—because you came from India—it doesn’t matter that you’ve never been to India, you never lived there. It doesn’t matter that, …

 

Sam Bamford: Are you proud of your Indian heritage?

 

Joanna Howe: Well, I’ll be honest, Sam—I don’t even really know anything about it. Like, I don’t! The curries [chuckling] that I’ve learnt to cook have been from a cookbook. Right? And I’m a Catholic, a Christian, so it just feels to me that what your definition comes down to is essentially—it’s people with White skin, because, …

 

Sam Bamford: Indigenous people don’t have white skin!

 

Joanna Howe: Yeah, but I feel like you’re including them.

 

James Howe: Why would you include Indigenous people? It just makes no sense. Because they happen to be on the land.

 

Sam Bamford: Yeah, we had the land—sorry, they had the land. We took it off them and we built all the shit! And now they use all the shit that we built. I think they’re Australian.

 

[45:35]

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[1:54:23]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Youtube Comments

top

(Comments as of 5/29/2026 = 348)

@SonicBoom12345
5 hours ago
That was unreal guys. Thanks for trying to nut it out. To hear the passion in each other’s voices mean that you are all real and you aren’t paid for bureaucrats.
18

@aussiegypsywarrior
6 hours ago
Just gave 2worldscollide a whole new meaning.
15

@davidcole4229
5 hours ago
I appreciated the way the discourse was allowed to flow and the respect shown to each other even though there was differing perspectives.
Certainly not easy to define what an Australian is definitely.
I found this discussion useful to help me define what an Aussie is in my own mind.
Excellent job guys!
17

@jirvin623
5 hours ago
I absolutely loved listening to the passion you all have. It was intelligent and sincere, from all 3 of you.
I am a Scottish /Australian who came here as a 2 1/2 year old in 1965. I consider myself as being as much of an Australian as the next person. Australian is my home but I am proud of my heritage..
Thanks for having such an open, raw and honest discussion
21

@gpumn1
5 hours ago
Yeah it was a great one. Very passionate.
4

Hide replies

@jasontudehope5518
9 hours ago
You’re right Sam, we Aussies need an identity to protect, defend and fight for.
51

7 replies

@aussiegypsywarrior
8 hours ago
36 minutes in and this is getting awesome. We definitely need more of these types of conversations
11

@BrodieJamesBuchal
7 hours ago
Refreshing to see that on the right side of politics you can get heated without threatening to kill someone.
Take note lefties.
26

@tanztrueblue
5 hours ago
Love this firey debate this is the conversations we all need to hear. Brave of you all!!!!!
7

@aussiegypsywarrior
7 hours ago (edited)
Holy moly. This was brilliant. I can see where both sides are coming from.
9

@DrJoannaHowe
10 hours ago
Thanks Sam for having us on. It was an intense discussion but an important one. For context, it was me (not James) who asked Sam to remove 2 short 5 second clips because of some legal challenges I’m facing in my workplace. Sam graciously agreed, for which I’m grateful. Although James & I and Sam don’t see eye to eye on everything, I hope people can see from this conversation the importance of talking even when we robustly disagree. As Charlie said, when people stop talking that’s when violence begins.
78

@Stankyfrtz
9 hours ago
Scripture has the answer, Deuteronomy says that yes we should take in those vulnerable (immigration) but we should beware of being dependent on transient people as when they outnumber us they will subdue us (mass immigration).
Hopefully this helps with the immigration debate.
8

@suitathletics9074
4 hours ago
You are Australian , but Sams point is there is also founding Australians which are European and Aboriginal. Bu im sick of seeing Aust getting invaded .
8

@BLESSED2XS
9 hours ago
Please don’t let any of this upset Your Marriage, Dr. Jo
6

@domburton
6 hours ago
You’re an aussie to me mate.
6

@jasonwolfe5787
3 hours ago
Poor argument about irish immigration from 2008 to 2016. It was about 15k to 25k net migration from Ireland then compared to 150k to 250k from India
5

@micphoenix8200
2 hours ago
There’s a delicious irony in the fact that our ‘adopted’ sister Joanna is a leading advocate against abortion in Australia and that her tireless advocacy will hopefully result in an uptick in Australians having lots of future Australians.
5

@JessicaWright-t6b
6 hours ago (edited)
There were parts in this discussion where scripture jumps out and both sides should read Ezekial 18 and take it in. NONE of us who are alive today can take one ounce of guilt or one ounce of righteousness from the actions of our forefathers.
If Christians could all wholeheartedly and with unity agree with these teachings clearly spelled out in Ezekial 18 (which we all should if we are being logically coherent) then we could all in one accord say babies are INNOCENT and no baby is deserving of death and we are all created in the womb, of equal value in Gods eyes – then we would be able to rightly and consistently address the issue of abortion and also would give us a clearer/consistent starting place for the immigration discussion.
This is the only consistent basis on which to discuss these topics but the majority of the “Christian” world Catholic and Protestant alike reject Ezekial 18 and cling to doctrines of man invented thousands of years after Christ.
1

@Toastmalone6192
8 hours ago
53:08 that’s so cute

@LD2022-g7t
6 hours ago
Part of the problem with Angelo Celtic is they are slowly turning Muslim and they are no longer examples of great societies… Spain is automatically giving illegal immigrants citizenship. Christian based values under the west minister system is much better definition.
10

@nunoza
10 hours ago (edited)
As a South African, Portuguese, Australian citizen, I want to thank both Sam and Dr Jo for all the work they do. I love freedom of speech, this is a great example.
8

@351SVO
9 hours ago
Joanna, you think and sound like an Aussie, you are an Aussie!
8

@BLESSED2XS
8 hours ago
​ @351SVO If I move to India and earn their Cultural Respect, gain an authentic accent, think like them, talk like them, walk like them, Marry an Indian, and have Children, I am an Australian-Indian and my hypothetical Children would be half-Indian, half-Australian, that DOES NOT make me less than the Indians and DOES NOT make an Indian “racist” for clearly seeing that I am not Indian. Australia is not an NWO experiment, Australia is just as much a Nation as Germany, as Samoa, as Tonga, as all of the other young Nations that got formed in the 1800s & 1900s, no different. We are ethnically Australian and to say that We are no different to British is “racist” to Us just as it is to say that there is no difference between Samoans, Maoris & Hawaiians even though they are all Polynesians, they are DIFFERENT, just like English, Welsh, Scottish & Northern Irish are all British yet they are DIFFERENT, so are Aussies, Kiwis & Canadians, We are of the root race of White/Caucasian but DIFFERENT, just like Indians, Pakis, Nepalese, Sri Lankan & Bengals are all South Asian but DIFFERENT. Respect Heritage Australians!!!
16

@andyrew127
31 minutes ago (edited)
I don’t understand how people can confuse what Sam’s saying? He’s not being racist one bit in the beliefs and comments of his. He’s not saying she’s not Australian. She is an Indian Australian citizen. And an amazing Indian Australian mind you. Probably better than a lot of traditional Australians.
Her husband even started his reply when asked how they met? He said i met this Indian chick?
Isn’t that exactly the opposite of the argument they were fighting? She is an Indian Australian. It was her traditional race from India which naturally defines her skin colour and her families born nationality of their proud culture. So any immigration from different races and cultures are changing our demographical traditional people of these founded lands of our. The traditional Australian race is being outbred by other races and new Australian citizens, originating from other country races. That’s not racist it’s fact.
1

@treewhisperer07
3 hours ago
Can we please start using the word naturalisation instead of assimilation.
3

@deewilson3208
1 hour ago
​ @treewhisperer07 different words with different meanings

@Toastmalone6192
9 hours ago
34:53 you don’t have problem with it, you just don’t want to accept it
1

@Toastmalone6192
9 hours ago
Why doesn’t your husband debate Sam’s alone ?
1

@jacoblowe4247
5 hours ago (edited)
Hi Jo, just adding this to your comment because it’s another comment I posted directed at Sam but thought you might find it interesting because I think it was an angle your husband was trying to explore when Sam kept interrupting his questions
By your own reasoning mate you have to call yourself English Australian and not just Australian because you originated from there. It’s so absurd, your arguments and definition fall apart with even the slightest stress test. What so if someone migrates from India to Germany, then has a child there and then that child grows up and migrates to Australia are they then indian-German-Australian and do they then fit into your classification of being “Anglo-Saxon, European” or whatever? Or would you not want that person to come to Australia because they are somehow not European because their heritage originates elsewhere. Then it becomes just a weird dive back in heritages and if we all go back far enough it’s Africa so I guess I’m an African-English-German-French-natural born Australian.
How about we just say that if you’re a citizen and you love our way of life and culture you’re an Australian and we should drastically reduce immigration so that no matter the colour of your skin or where you come from you can adapt to our way of life, which will of course evolve because we don’t want to live in a bloody stagnate culture. Gosh many other cultures have food culture far superior than ours and we should totally import some of that… Man acts like he hates a curry.
I think the words of Martin Luther King apply that a man should be judged not by the colour of his skin (or where their bloody heritage is from), but upon their character. Being Australian is a matter of character, not heritage. I know plenty of Australians hailing from other countries like South Africa for example who display a level of patriotism for this country that far exceeds that of basically any leftist activist who consistently whine about our Australian heritage and values. Despite many of these activists being however many generation Australians I’d argue they are demonstrably less Australian then our proud Australians who have come from South Africa.
Do South Africans fit in your “Anglo European” categories? What about indigenous South Africans? Be careful how you answer to not make it about the colour of one’s skin hey…
Sorry “bro” but your views
fall apart with even the slightest pressure test.
And like bro how many generations in your mind does one no longer be say Indian Australian and just become Australian? You said Joanna’s kids are half Indian half Australian…. So after 10 generations that’s like 10% Indian and 90% Australian right? So you reckon you can define Australian, so what is a 90% Australian, how are they different than 100% Australian? Are you not 100% Australian because of your British heritage, so like 90% yourself? Genuinely curious…
6

Hide replies

@WinstonRugman
1 hour ago
Am an 85 year old born in England, have been an Australian citizen for 40 years and am proud to be an English Australian.

@davidataturk4357
9 hours ago (edited)
Australian culture is historically majority European/Anglo/Celtic and Aboriginal stock.
It should remain majority that way
But that doesn’t mean mixed blood Aussies who were born in Australia are less Aussie because one of their parents chose to marry outside of euro Anglo aboriginal or Celt.
10

@jacobeldridge5038
5 hours ago
Great job Sam. You’re correct, stick to your guns
7

@Cappuccino-ph7rp
1 hour ago
Fair call. You can’t criticise one person’s answer while being unable to answer the same question.

@HeatherClark-f5b
8 hours ago (edited)
I really admire Sam’s ability to stick to his guns.
12

@HeatherClark-f5b
3 hours ago
I am amazed at the way some people can get very angry with each other but kiss and make up.
2

@fpenman
7 hours ago
Podcast episode of the year
8

@JohnSmith-z4s
7 hours ago
An “ethnic Australian” typically refers to a person of primarily Anglo-Celtic (British and Irish) descent whose family has deep roots in Australia, often tracing back to the colonial period (late 18th century onward). This is distinct from Australian nationality (citizenship) or broader “Australian” identity.
13

@micphoenix8200
6 hours ago

@grannyannie2948
5 hours ago
I differentiate by how you or your ancestors arrived here. Sailing ship, ocean liner, or plane?

@jaydenMRPF
5 hours ago
The issue with that is in said 17-1800s we also had Dutch, German and Chinese all out here carving their own place in the country. SA had a very large amount of free settlers in this time period, a lot of which were German, not English. They also refer to Irish, but there were plenty of Scots too in this time period. Go look at old graves, street names, road names, even town names. There were a few large ethnic groups set up Australia, not just the British.

@JohnSmith-z4s
4 hours ago
​ @jaydenMRPF Germans are extremely close in genetics to the British and the Anglo-Saxons came from northern Germany. Scots are British btw. The Australian ethnicity is unique, forming in the 19th century and is around 50% 󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿English, 28% Irish, 14% Scottish and 5% German in origin. Australia will change drastically unless it only accepts immigrants who are ethnically British, Irish, Dutch, German, Danish, Norwegian, Swedish, Austrian, Belgian, Swiss or French!
2

@micphoenix8200
4 hours ago
​ @JohnSmith-z4s Exactly. If Australia was given a couple of thousand years applied with similar historical and technology development & circumstances then we’d have similar differences in language and culture etc between each state. Victorians would speak Victorianese, Tasmanians would have similar rates of first cousin marriage as Pakistan..
1

@micphoenix8200
4 hours ago
​ @jaydenMRPF All first world Western nations (Australia, Canada, USA etc) share a common ethnic and cultural heritage. Ethnically European and culturally Christian.

@jaydenMRPF
3 hours ago

@m @micphoenix8200 is is true. But the ethnicity is broad across a bunch of European countries. If you take a Scottish person and drop them in Holland, they’re very different, just like if you drop an English person northern island, the English person disappears lol The colonies, free settlers and freed convicts were made up of a lot of these different European ethnicities. The values, laws and cultures though are what the main common ground is. It was a culmination of all those people coming together and mixing to create what we today call Australian, or the Australian culture. But we can’t ignore the fact that there was also a large Chinese cohort here in the 1800s laying roots as well, you see this places like central Victoria. So I suppose I do agree with premise of at what point did these people tick over to be pure “Australian” and “English Australian” or “Dutch Australian” or “Irish Australian” as it was described. Because in the early 1900s and late 1800s every had come from somewhere and those born here were only 1-2 generations removed from somewhere else. Which means everyone is technically some sort of prefix Australian. No one other than native indigenous Australians have pure Australian Heritage. We are no different to America in that regard. Defining a pure Australian demographic isn’t that easy.

Hide replies

@RajNaidoo-b4e
8 hours ago
All of this doesn’t matter.
If you’re born in Britain, you’re British.
If you migrate to Australia, you’re a brit living in Australia.
Once you get citizenship, you’re still a Brit with an Australian Citizenship.
I think what we need to to define is what and who we give citizenship to… people who are contributing to and assimilating to Australia & hold our values.
If you’re born here you’re Australian. If you’re not, you are what / where you were born. That’s not the argument.
17

@gpumn1
5 hours ago
Totally agree
2

@moniquebeer-korver1107
5 hours ago
I think the problem there is if a person from another country comes here 8 months pregnant and gives birth here, their child is automatically an “Australian”. Now the parents of that child are bound to Australia because of that child, that’s why birth right citizenship probably needs to be looked at
2

@MSummaz
47 minutes ago
So basically, no one is Australian Australian because we all have heritage from all over the world! This make no freaking sense Sam

Hide replies

@MattGray-c9v
2 hours ago
To me Jo is an Australian. But Sam is right about being an Australian
3

@Kateeheel7
8 hours ago
I nearly broke my leg running to the comments
8

@aussiegypsywarrior
7 hours ago

Hide replies

@aussiegypsywarrior
6 hours ago
Sam has a hard time looking at it from a Christian perspective due to not really understanding Christianity. Culture comes from a belief system. Imo.
7

@Numptee86
3 hours ago
Hot debate. Thank you for working through it. I agree with Dr Jo (and as a PROUD Anglo-Celtic Aussie, i think she is an Aussie too) that we are at a GREAT moment in turning the tide…..DONT get lost in the weeds. Her husband is correct….its the Christian aspect that has made Australia what it is….and Christians come in all colours. But i can be fairly certain a Christian moving to Australia is likely to assimilate.
6

@bryce222nice
8 hours ago (edited)
Sam is NOT discriminating or making the argument that different ethnicities have less value. Just because Sam isn’t as articulate as a lifetime academic, it doesn’t mean his position is racist or discriminatory. James is emotionally reactive & can’t understand what the meat and potatoes of the argument is. Sam is trying to protect Australia. He wouldn’t move to India, get a citizenship, assimilate to Indian culture & call himself Indian? He’s now an Australian-Indian
7

@amandapinker2659
54 minutes ago
Guys I have become recent fans of all 3 of you. but I’ve never been comfortable with confrontation, that was hectic!

@justintarczon3347
1 hour ago
That was very well done and I sympathise with both sides but the main enemy is the labour government. Don’t forget that!
2

@jaydenMRPF
1 hour ago (edited)
As always, a great podcast having the conversations that need to be had. This was a good example of how to agree, disagree and agree to disagree without becoming mortal enemies.
On the topic itself, this is a prickly one. But ultimately trying to define an “Australian ethnicity” demographic is rather difficult given that during the 17-1800s, the penal colonies, settlers and freed convicts that banded together to create what we know today all came from different backgrounds themselves. Yes, a lot were of Anglo-Celtic and Western European descent, but there’s different ethnic groups within that bracket, English, Scottish, Irish, Dutch and German. All of these were prominent groups who laid the foundations of what we have today. All very different to one another. You only have to look at the names in old cemeteries, town names, street names, road names, a lot aren’t what you’d call typical “Anglo” names. South Australia being a prime example with Hahndorf or Klemzig. These names didn’t appear from nowhere. But the elephant in the room during that time period is the Chinese. This is another ethnic group that also laid foundations in Australia during that time before federation. So that does hinder the purely European demographic as being the people building Australia before federation. Then you get to the Australia as we know it today, which was ultimately built off the backs of post war migrants from both Western and eastern Europe. Melbourne being a good example with the cities cultural identity for food and coffee basically being forged by what we now fondly call (I mean this respectfully) as Wogs, Italians, Greeks etc. These people laid down roots, had families and their children became Australian. Ultimately it comes down to the values, laws, culture and traditions that these people all shared. Because as an Australian, we aren’t British, our culture and outlook on life is vastly different, drop an Aussie in a room with 3 Brits and the differences become apparent very quickly. As Australians we formed our own culture. Yes this is based of our European ancestry, but is uniquely our own, which is because we had all of these above mentioned ethic groups come together and intermingled to create the ”Australian” we all recognise today. We are the same as the USA and Canada in the fact that we’re all came from somewhere else at some point in our history or ancestry, with exception to the indigenous people. The attempt to define an Australian is important, but the definition that’s been presented is problematic. A clear definition and enforcement of our Values, Laws, Culture and traditions is what’s needed. Immigration frozen like Canada did and then when immigration is started up again, a slow, controlled system that allows for integration is needed. Linage also matters. If you come here from somewhere else and you on to have kids here, grandkids here and great grandkids here and so on, then just like our ancestors who all also came here from somewhere, they are Australian. No prefix added.
Also for Japanese argument, it’s stupid. We are like the USA and Canada in the sense that we were founded by people who came to those lands from elsewhere, we were not native to the land. The Japanese people are native to the land, they are the people of that land and have been there for thousands of years and such, you would expect it to be a homogeneous society demographically. To compare a society like that Australia is just uninformed or disingenuous.
In a modern Australia, the definitions of what an Australian is should be simple. 2 categories, A naturalised Australian citizen, someone who has immigrated here from somewhere else and has qualified to become an Australian citizen. OR a Native born Australian citizen, someone who was born in Australia to parents who are both Australian citizens either naturalised or native born. Dual citizenship shouldn’t be allowed for those immigrating here to Aquire citizenship. Nor should it be allowed in Parliament. Provided our immigration policy and society adequately promotes, protects and enforces the Australian laws, cultures, values and traditions, and we make sure those immigrating here are from places that share our values, then Australia will remain “Aussie” for many years to come regardless of original ethnicity. Unfortunately or governments are failing at this part miserably, which is why this whole conversation is being had in the first place.

@metgirl5429
6 hours ago
My parents came from holland
Here 50 years Dutch Australian never a prob
They saw themselves as that
Assimilated no Dutch club always spoke Australian
I have never seen myself as a Dutch Australian
Please make this make sense
Well we donot mention the elephant in the room
The cult / political ideology
That’s the issue
They are here to overtake not assimilate
And we are paying them to do that
The gov wants votes
Are we awake now
6

@jessiejordan2853
6 minutes ago
The Dutch are Germanic, so are Anglos.
We share common geography, ancestry and cultural heritage going back thousands of years.

Hide replies

@seikochako
6 hours ago
I feel there is only one real answer. If Western countries are built on Christian values, then immigration policy should also reflect those values.
People coming here should respect the foundations of the country, including its Christian heritage, laws, culture, and way of life.
I also believe schools and public institutions should stop pushing every religious belief and festival as if they are all part of Australia’s national identity. People are free to celebrate their own faith and culture, but that can be done in their own homes, churches, temples, community halls, or private spaces.
No one should feel the need to hide Christmas, avoid saying “Merry Christmas,” or remove the nativity just to avoid offending other religions.
5

@FrogBlasters
5 hours ago (edited)
We are one, but we are many, and from all the lands of earth we come, we share a dream and sing with one voice. I am you are we are Australian.
We need everyone who shares our values in the same tribe and we need to also follow the example of those who built Australia. Start there and build together. Dont strangle populism in the cradle.
1

@KathyRan
8 hours ago
Even the Australian Aboriginal came from somewhere else initially. They’ve just been here a bit longer. Australia has a definite culture but the absolute flood of recent immigration is diluting the prevailing Australian culture. The current policy is quantity over quality leading to silos. This needs to stop. Immigrants are visitors & it’s a privilege to become Australian. Treat citizenship like the valuable prize it is.
3

@h.epeterjohnmanthey6295
1 hour ago
The strongest armour a Christian can wear is our faith. Go to church, pray to Jesus for guidance and we’ll do what is right cause Jesus can perform miracles. As a Christian nation and people we love everyone & welcome all those who wish to live with us in peace. But it’s not wise to offer ones house to a stranger & put our own children out into the cold. Love & prudence. Practical judgment & dicipline through the use of reason.
3

@Eravide
4 hours ago
“I think this might be the start of a friendship,” great way to end it! It was intense at times, but that’s what you need- heated conversations with strong people who genuinely care to make positive change. SO glad to see you guys didn’t shy away from a difficult chat.
Ultimately, I found James and Jo very compelling. At first I was open to Sam’s definition of an Australian, but honestly James hit the nail on the head when he said, ‘there is a difference between race and culture.’ I also appreciated Jame’s transparency that it can be tempting to be tribalistic and prioritise your own race, but ultimately at the end of the day all people are equal in the eyes of God. This is a nuanced conversation, but James and Jo are right that the immigration problem can’t be solved on the basis of race, but rather on the basis of culture and values. Well done guys, love this podcast.
3

@martincoyle-o3b
24 minutes ago
Jo is all Aussie the type we need

@Numptee86
57 minutes ago
Duke it out, then find common ground and UNITE. We can’t risk fracturing and giving the labor/green side of politics any more chances

@raelaris
9 hours ago (edited)
the thing that turned me on abortion was when i watched a documentary on babies and they cited a study that found that newborn babies can recognise their father’s voice.
4

@triciamears7338
2 hours ago
Fantastic debate.
Keep them coming Sam.
I don’t have all the answers, but, listening to this type of debate only helps me to “define” what my opinions are and it helps all of us (the ones who are interested and care about where our country is heading) to appreciate the complexities of what we “Australians” are truly facing. Keep talking, we’re listening

@user-uu2ty6xs8l
7 hours ago
Sam much respect.
4

@yogibighouse1
9 hours ago
Yeah me and my wife tried ivf $15000 on procedures and nothing. Me and wife would of jumped on the opportunity to have a baby
6

@mic4788
6 hours ago
Sam, on that point I think you’re incorrect. Their children are Australian. They were born here
7

@batesmate5510
3 hours ago
I think it’s more about potential religious upbringing, European religion for the most part aligns with ours where as somewhere like India worships different gods. Even if Dr Joanna Dosnt practice Indian type religion it’s still that exposure.

@Samsy22
2 hours ago (edited)
Sam is wrong on this, too much ego built into the opinion, needs to rethink in the cold light of day after letting heat cool out of it. Sam is intellectually out of his depth with this debate and just on repeat like a broken record without ever actually listening or absorbing the logic or reason.
How do I know, cause I used to do the same thing, fall back on the stubborn/proud thing and die on that hill just because I had strong opinions held with white knuckles.
1

Hide replies

@GoranRadovanovic-m4b
7 hours ago
Oh my goodness what an episode? Definitely love listening to it. There’s a few points I’d love to have a pick at. but all in all it was good listening to all three of them.
2

@leonmiller4774
10 hours ago
How can any sane human poison and torture a living human baby and call themselves a medical proffesional because all abortion is murder anytime from conception onwards i say BAN ALL ABORTION
11

@grannyannie2948
10 hours ago
When a third of the population is born overseas, who are the Australian women choosing this procedure? It is often done in cultures that don’t value girls.
1

Hide replies

@Thecarnivorecoachkymbullen
4 hours ago
Such an important conversation. 3 strong personalities, you all did well.
2

@MaySpecials
7 hours ago
She’s good
7

@jimini_crikit322
3 hours ago
It’s clearly a complex and emotive issue; I think you have all made incredibly valid points. I meet the “definition” of what Sam deems to be Australian. However, I don’t agree that excluding people from being Australian based on their ethnic background is the answer here.
In my opinion, being Australian is that you were 1) Born here 2) Share our Christian values and culture 3) Denounce all other cultures
It’s not a perfect list, but I think it makes the most sense
2

@tonypalmer9575
7 hours ago
It is so important to have these debates. Most of us do not yet have the cultural vocabulary for these arguments. So many cultural and political terms in use at the moment are coded with meanings and histories derived from post war liberalism. I hope in time conservatives will formulate their own meanings on their own terms. Well done, Sam.
2

@kimeccleston5586
7 hours ago
Well said

Hide replies

@TrishOwen
1 hour ago
My definition of an aussie is someone who was born here or came here when they were small children, grew up celebrating Australia day with back yard cricket, beach, bbqs and beers and would fight for Australia.
I wouldn’t move to the middle east and refer to myself as middle eastern. I was call myself an aussie. And if war broke out, i wouod be back here in Australia fighting with Australia.

@kimeccleston5586
10 hours ago
It’s heavy going but probably necessary. Kind of like argueing on the deck of the Titanic if a Violin is Viola as the ship sinks beneath the waves.
4

@mic4788
7 hours ago (edited)
Sam you can use the annology of “rabbits & cane toads with regard to immigration” if we import the wrong immigrants they don’t assimilate. I can understand your point.
3

@treewhisperer07
2 hours ago
Great debate
2

@RajNaidoo-b4e
9 hours ago
James & Sam sound like long lost mates! Love it. (saying this 18 mins in, we’ll see how it goes)
3

@hamish2884
5 hours ago
Cant wait to watch this!
2

@Steve-HIMSELF
6 hours ago
Sam, your debating training pays for itself. This bloke definitely came in with an agenda and you clapped him with logic. This shows that he has the labour party mentality if he can’t even define what an Australian is.
10

@wildstallionbby6369
8 hours ago
Enjoyed this see it is possible to debate opposing ideas .. without (imagining )violence .. mostly
3

@greeningfam8359
2 hours ago
You’re right, that did get a little heated
1

@johnrogers5825
7 hours ago
Love the fiery arguments. So much better to have it out in the open as opposed to sleazy politicians who talk politely and deceptively. Stop the PC bullshit and say it how it is ffs.
3

@MaySpecials
7 hours ago
Fair debate
3

@leonmiller4774
9 hours ago
The 4 parts of my forebares came here as follows 1832 English whalers 1841 German in Klemzig Adelaide 1854 Ehglish 1904 Scottish Kiwi so what am i now i consider myself a true blue Aussie yes my ancestors help build this country we went to jail for this country (1st world war because of our German heritage even though we were 2nd and 3rd generation Aussie) i am white all my family is white and I’m proud to be a white Australian, i do believe in the white Australia policy and that it should be bought back for the fact people had to speak english and assimilate to our culture by denouncing where they come from and accept our way of life
5

@colin76545
4 hours ago
This debate has to happen and keep happening and every where this debate it always ends up the same way which is (I’m a civic national vs I’m an ethnic national) and no matter what happens it’s never going to stop

@darrenparsons5299
8 hours ago
Christianity is the key fundamental
3

@APP1E5
4 hours ago (edited)
By Sam’s definition, I would be Australian.
My parents were Australian. Three of my grandparents were Australian. The other was British and fought for Australia in the First World War 977 DCM.
So I am not objecting because his definition excludes me. I am objecting because it points nationality in the wrong direction.
Australia should not be reduced to Indian Australian, English Australian, Scottish Australian, German Australian, or any other divided label. There should be Australians.
A person’s ancestry may explain where their family came from, but it should not become their permanent political identity.
The real question is loyalty, assimilation, culture, language, law, and shared values.
If someone comes here, makes Australia their home, accepts Australia’s inherited institutions, speaks our common language, raises Australian children, and gives their loyalty to this country, then they should become Australian.
Not partly Australian. Not hyphenated Australian. Australian.
That is why Joanna matters in this conversation. She is of Indian descent, born in the UK, speaks with an Australian accent, holds Australian values, and the most important point is that she is Christian.
That places her much closer to the old civilisational inheritance of Australia than many people who may have the right ancestry but reject everything Australia was built upon.
Australia must control immigration. Australia must demand assimilation. Australia should not allow divided loyalty. Australian or nothing.
But the answer is not to turn nationality into race.
The answer is one people, one country, one loyalty.
Australians.
5

@blakewaugh2536
4 hours ago
could not sum it up better

@MSummaz
14 minutes ago

Hide replies

@Butcherbirdsarecool
9 hours ago (edited)
Geez this was a frustrating video. Sam did a great job to sit there and listen to that. Being yelled at by Dr Jo’s husband. I know he’s defending Jo but geez mate I felt like I needed to block my ears. I agree with Sam on this one.
Rude asf dude!! Jo’s husband was in full attack mode. He wouldn’t listen and didn’t want to listen. What a dick! Sorry but wtf!
16

@slash1989
1 hour ago
Give Gov A cut And a pay cut No big Australia get there heads out of the clouds

@MagicManintheSky-j9q
3 hours ago
Sam is right. These people don’t understand the difference between ethnicity and citizenship. It’s not rocket science.
1

@benkhosh
6 hours ago
An Australian is someone who comes here and completely adopts Australian values and heritage and does not congregate in there Enclave of ethnicities. And by my definitions you can become Australian before you get citizenship or by the same token you are not Australian even if you have citizenship but do not integrate fully
3

@aphaseelec
5 hours ago
Sam you are the man. I 100% agree with you. He was fine and I liked his points but that part where he kept going to skin color was frustrating as hell. One thing I disagree with you on is you invited him to your house that didnt need to come up.
1

@ColdPatterns
9 hours ago
Well hopefully I can go over to India as a white woman and be considered an Indian
4

@grannyannie2948
10 hours ago
Ban abortion And ban immigration. Problem solved.
4

@gpumn1
5 hours ago
Not enough of the conversation is being had around completely shutting down immigration for 4-5 years. It will buy us much needed time to fix our nation and help determine the right path moving forward.
1

@Guska95
8 hours ago (edited)
James came across far more thought out and intellectually honest. His family is Australian ditch the sub class catagories we can only unite on Christian values and culture
3

@blakewaugh2536
5 hours ago
Anglo Celtic is different to Anglo saxon (which is what you are referring to in Germanic). Which one are we using here…?
1

@akingsroad
7 hours ago (edited)
That would have been really good without all the name calling.
It was actually really interesting to listen when you guys were teasing out some of the ideas around what is an Australian.
Don’t stop talking about this guys. I hope you catchup again, and remove the personal attacks because there were some really interesting ideas being discussed.
1

@Kingxr6t
5 hours ago
I liked Sams argument and i admire hes attempt at defining what (Australians) are, but i also understand old mates view and the flaw hes seeing, it might sound bad and theres probably most definitely flaws here! But myself= a cut off point? When did the people living here become Australians? Land was Mostly made up of brittish “subjects” and indigenous in 1949 no longer subjects or (just indigenous) we become our own individual people i.e Australians and there is a difference we mingled with indigenous and weve mixed together to make something different no longer just! a brittish subject or just! Indigenous, Put an Australian and a brit in a room together? Are they the same? Can you tell them Apart? Who’s who? 1 word gets spoken & BANG! You know exactly who is who hes an Aussie hes an brit, different lingo or accent, we are different how? Still working on it! the only thing we have in common is religion/ Christian values, drop an Aussies in Britain or ANY! white country he wont instantly adapt because theres different social norms behaviours, celebrations ect brits tea and crumpets Aussies bacon and eggs we are different the way we interact theres so many differences ,and yea it can be hard to pin down thats only because the conversations haven’t happened, that doesnt mean we haven’t shaped into our own individual people (Australians) and this country was shaped into what it is today due to a mixture of indigenous/ white Christian based subjects (similar) to other Christian nations, a white American isnt now Australian because hes white and was born here, the population of 8 million that lived here in 1949 and the millions born over the decades are what Australians are! In my opinion if you decent from that 8 million then you define what Australians are
2

@Alessandro-b4k
1 hour ago
Hey guys, good to debate these things. I want to share that this was directly addressed during the Eureka rebellion, as the government accussed ‘foreigners’, basically non-english, as causing the rebellion. The Ballarat Times Jan 01 1855 has a letter where the author refer to new arrivals as being the newest Australians etc. Give it a read, I don’t have the link with me now and cbf typing it up. But it reflects a very early perspective on the matter, granted they are talking mainly about other Europeans, like Italians etc. that were a part of the rebellion, such as Carboni. I think it is a convenient definition the host has for Australian, when I was at school the anglos couldn’t work out if Euro wogs were Australian or not…thanks to the arrival of muslims and indians we are now conveniently Australian, well I won’t complain, but we are certainly NOT the same ethnicity as the anglos, and culturely massively different thanks be to God. Happy for Australia to stay British though says I. Cheers

@Shallowchal
10 hours ago
What did I just watch -holy heck.
7

@williamguile1788
6 hours ago
That was a tough listen.
1

@kimeccleston5586
10 hours ago
Do you have a definition around the 42 min mark?

@domburton
5 hours ago
Crazy aye

Hide replies

@DB-in3jy
4 hours ago
Brilliant episode!
1

@APP1E5
4 hours ago
Sam’s argument falls apart on “Anglo Celtic” Look up John Christian Watson reputedly born in Valparaiso, Chile. King OMalley, Evidence points to USA. Two of the first Parliament.
1

@JustJoshofficial89
3 hours ago
Good work pushing through guys, hashed it out in the end.
Want to hear more on the mass immigration part you all agreed on a thoughts on what could be done.
Perhaps a new rule for the pod, 15 mins stuck on the same argument move on.
1

@breban18
4 hours ago
I think Sam doesn’t really believe people from a non-European background aren’t Australian. Audience capture is a problem and clicks are a powerful driver of opinion.
1

@CoenKR
4 hours ago
While both parties have things I do and don’t agree with my opinion is that you can’t say someone has Nazi and racial ideology about what they believe is an Australian while saying they don’t know how to define what an Aussie is in saying that I’m pleased that these discussions and debates are being had the way it should be even if it gets heated

@ausbushman2347
2 hours ago
The key word that seems to be getting dropped too often is Ethnic. To be an ethnic Australian you have to have descent from here and Anglo-Celtic descent. If you come from an Anglo-Celtic heritage but aren’t born here, you are not an ethnic Australian, but you can be an Australian citizen. Everyone else can only be a citizen. Jo is a great Australian… citizen. She can never be an ethnic Australian because she wasnt born here. Her kids could be seen as ethnic Australians because they have an Australian father, even if they do have a mixed heritage. I dont think we can avoid having mixed heritage these days.
1

@leonmiller4774
9 hours ago (edited)
Sam in Joes case to me shes a pom not an Indian also as a Christian you should believe in creation not that crappy evolution in that case we all came out of Mesopotamia not Africa
On another level didn’t you say your forebares came here after 1901?
Jo there is only a few million Irish there is 1.5 billion Indians and we didn’t import 100,000 of thousands of them like we have Indians and Jo being born in England was a pom before becoming
Jo is an english Australian not Indian Australian
Actually Sam India was part of the British commonwealth up until just after WW2
According to our constitution we do not have freedom of religion but freedom of association and there is a difference and Jo’s kids are Aussie not Indian Australian
Sorry my comments are slightly incoherent but I’m following along your conversation
3

@reubensrichardson
3 hours ago (edited)
Great interview. Defining something is the first step in protecting it.

@NicholasWitham
2 hours ago
Sam, I hope you have watched this back by yourself.
James was trying to show that when you differentiate someone as Indian-Australian or just Australian you do actually create a hierarchy of Australian.
I am Australian born on Australia. My father is from England in the 70s and my Mother is from Malaysia. With your definition my “Australian” label is somewhat grey….and to James’ point, this is similar to how the left define woman…it’s grey when it shouldn’t be.
I’m glad you had this debate, and I’m glad there were no fists thrown lol.
I hope your debate skills can grow in the future, and that you do become open to other ideas, your ideas and opinions are great and well rooted in yourself, but being open to other ideas makes a much better debater as you can see things from the opposite side….which I don’t think you can do very well right now. You seem to be very staunch with your argument and not willing to hear the arguments against them…although James didn’t do a great job at explaining the argument.
Keep up the good work, I’m looking forward to more.
1

@SueMurphy-l2n
6 hours ago (edited)
James referred to the people in the NT as Chinese people. He actually identified them based on their looks, which is just what Sam is trying to establish
1

@jimhaggerty2741
4 hours ago
Question for Sam Bamford:
If Australia became a full republic tomorrow, cut constitutional ties to Britain, changed the flag, and built a completely independent Australian identity separate from the Crown — where would you stand on that?
Would you support a fully sovereign Australian nationalism with an Australian flag, independent identity, and recognition that Aboriginal Australians were the original people of the continent?
Or is your idea of Australia still ultimately tied to British heritage and the Anglo world?

@ShaneCooper-b2u
3 hours ago
thank you very much

@DanAttewell-y5b
45 minutes ago
So it’s a mentality.

@jacoblowe4247
5 hours ago (edited)
India was part of the British Commonwealth the same British empire that founded Australia. So I guess because of their British heritage they can call themselves Australians and not just Australian citizens right? They technically have British heritage too… Just like you pal… I really don’t think you thought about this deeper than skin deep!
In fact their country was colonised before ours so I guess you could say that they have a longer British heritage than you do man. So can we lump India into Anglo and European because of their British heritage?
2

@Citraz62
9 minutes ago
NO.

Hide replies

@Cappuccino-ph7rp
1 hour ago
He shouldn’t be able to ask questions he can’t answer himself.
1

@southern-samurai
6 hours ago
Join the Australian Natives Association. Sounds like they are in sync with your position.
1

@nomoremaybes
6 minutes ago
She did the meme lol

@johnrogers5825
7 hours ago
James has wiggled his way into the Dr Jo podcast and I have been unsure about him, but now, watching him here, I don’t like what I see. He has agendas, and his potty mouth is one of the worst I have ever heard.
4

@aussiegypsywarrior
6 hours ago
His potty mouth is one of the worst you’ve ever heard? Really? I don’t agree with foul language in any way however, I’ve heard much worse.
2

Hide replies

@slash1989
13 minutes ago
Not hard men we need strong men

@kjing8109
5 hours ago
So what’s an Australian according to each side? Someone save me watching this entire episode

@victorgomes7585
2 hours ago
Dr Jo is simply gorgeous. You guys are a wonderful compatible couple. And I had no idea Dr Jo has Portuguese heritage. Well… hugs from a proud Portuguese born Australian citizen. PS … to be in positions of power, politics etc… no dual citizenship should be allowed for such person. Our biggest enemy is within.
5

@brontepetropoulos4755
9 hours ago
Great video
2

@scooter183
6 hours ago
South Africa and Rhodesia, Take a look at the 70s and take a look Now.. Australia is Next . Case Closed.
1

@danielpearce7585
8 hours ago (edited)
Yeah. That’s the stuff. I can see me in you Sammy. It’s that logic that kicks in and its hard to talk to these folks. Your a good man and I hear your argument’s and your personality shining through. I love it. Ex navy myself of 11 years and I wonder how much of this logic come from subservience to your country and a cause.

@becomng
2 hours ago
Pausing immigration isn’t such a crazy idea. Pausing immigration gave Canadian renters their first nationwide rent relief in five years, pushing vacancy rates above their 10-year average and driving 12 straight months of falling asking prices.

@raphaelbotelho91
3 hours ago
What a fcking great episode, guys

@uebergangster
3 hours ago
An ‘Australian’ is a legal citizen of the country who adopts the cultural and religious norms (which are inter-related). Skin colour and prior national background aren’t relevant in that equation. However, the argument against mass immigration and exclusion of majority immigration of certain nationalities is that both may threaten to either overwhelm the cultural norm, or that there is a heightened risk that immigrants under such cirumstances will not endeavour to adapt.
1

@uebergangster
3 hours ago
So the definition of what we are protecting is the cultural norm, not a biological race (which is not a real thing anyway). The cultural norm of Australian is then defined as: Christian (you don’t have to be practising, but be at least sympathetic), family oriented, capitalist (not socialist), generally politically conservative, accepting Westminster style democratic parliamentary rule and equality under the law.
1

Hide replies

@wotslife
6 hours ago

@marleymeathook1975
9 hours ago
On 23 December 1901 the Immigration Restriction Act came into law. White australia policy. We would be a lot better off if it was still law. Do you think we would have a lot of these problems today? i dare say we wouldnt even be talking bout this. love this podcast bro!
3

@grannyannie2948
8 hours ago
Exactly. Our forefathers federated to achieve two objectives. To implement the WAP, and to build a navy capable of defending the country. I would argue that the federal government has been a complete failure and should be suspended.
I can’t understand why all three of them ran away from the term the White Australia Policy, which was very popular and should come back.
2

Hide replies

@BLESSED2XS
9 hours ago
Dr. Jo, I Love You soooo much, You are an AUSTRALIAN, Nationality & Culturally, and brilliant one at that!!! But You ethnically an Indian.
The British aren’t from Britain naturally, they are from mainland Europe and before that Israel and before that the Caucus Mountain Range hence “Caucasians.”
To say that there is no such thing as Ethnically Australian just because We’ve only been here since 1788 (yes, my Ancestors came over on the First Fleet) HAS to be matched with “there’s no such thing as Ethnically British, or any National-Ethnic Identity other than the 3 root races of old social science: Whites/Caucasians, Blacks/Negroids & Asians/Mongoloids, and everyone is just one of those or a mix of those.” But that is not true, Samoans are Samoans (not just Polynesians), Irish are Irish (not just Whites), Fijians are Fijians (not just Melanesians), Ethiopians are Ethiopians (not just Africans), etc.
I am all for a multi-racial Australia as long as everyone lives the Australian monoculture and Ethnically Australian Australians are put first and that ONLY Australians can be in Parliament/Federal Government, and in State & Local Governments.
I Love You just as much as any Australian and I would fight for You to be protected and secure in Australia.
GOD Bless
5

@BLESSED2XS
8 hours ago
If I move to India and earn their Cultural Respect, gain an authentic accent, think like them, talk like them, walk like them, Marry an Indian, and have Children, I am an Australian-Indian and my hypothetical Children would be half-Indian, half-Australian, that DOES NOT make me less than the Indians and DOES NOT make an Indian “racist” for clearly seeing that I am not Indian. Australia is not an NWO experiment, Australia is just as much a Nation as Germany, as Samoa, as Tonga, as all of the other young Nations that got formed in the 1800s & 1900s, no different. We are ethnically Australian and to say that We are no different to British is “racist” to Us just as it is to say that there is no difference between Samoans, Maoris & Hawaiians even though they are all Polynesians, they are DIFFERENT, just like English, Welsh, Scottish & Northern Irish are all British yet they are DIFFERENT, so are Aussies, Kiwis & Canadians, We are of the root race of White/Caucasian but DIFFERENT, just like Indians, Pakis, Nepalese, Sri Lankan & Bengals are all South Asian but DIFFERENT. Respect Heritage Australians!!!
1

Hide replies

@gregsags3364
2 hours ago
F-ing good podcast.

@Howdnz
8 hours ago
That escalated quickly

@trishwilson8141
5 hours ago
I agree values are Australian

@Toastmalone6192
7 hours ago
Aussie Logan Paul being triggered for 2 hours
3

@ItsMe-vy1wt
3 hours ago
I’d absolutely LUV to see that “Fuck the ABC” sign done up all nice & professional…..& LARGE!

@Itsmevgc
5 hours ago
My mum has been here since 77, she’s still British
1

@MSummaz
11 minutes ago
Is she a citizen? If she is, she’s an Aussie with an English background! This whole hyphenated thing is a load of nonsense and I refuse to play that game. I’m Australian first and foremost who happens to have English ancestry. Sam’s argument is asinine!

@Itsmevgc
7 minutes ago

@MSummazher words not mine. And she’s a hell of a lot wiser than you. You’re wrong, listen and learn. Sam is %100 correct.

Hide replies

@jittmet7766
1 hour ago
James – the GREEKS created democracy.

@broke3008
3 hours ago

@unipartywonagainstthepeople
9 hours ago
Great stuff
1

@Pauly-v9j
1 hour ago (edited)
As a Aboriginal descent and European descent. A Australian is a person been here from birth or been here 6 years plus when they received their citizenship AND speaking English AND Christian beliefs AND leaving any other cultures war’s at our Australian door before they come in. My thoughts. Probably not agreed by some people. But it’s okay everyone has a different opinion.
Problem not speaking English is my wife is a nurse and some nurses can’t speak English properly and my wife finds it hard to understand them.
So Dr Joanna Howe you would fit into my definition as a Australian. Been here more than 6 years with citizenship papers, speak amazing English AND Christian beliefs.
4

@KathyRan
7 hours ago
There are some Chinese families that have been here since before Federation, so many, many generations. They are Australian in my opinion. Not Chinese Australian.
2

@domburton
5 hours ago
You’re absolutely right.
1

Hide replies

@slash1989
1 hour ago
No foul Langauge

@domburton
5 hours ago
I like Sam, but his definition is very problematic. To say Joe’s kids are not fully Australian cause they have brown skin is unjust and ridiculous. They share our religion and values and culture. They have no connection to India, as i have no connection to Ireland or Britain, except parts of their culture.
3

@RajNaidoo-b4e
10 hours ago
Abortion is murder!
4

@h.epeterjohnmanthey6295
7 hours ago
Yeah those who get angry know they are wrong.
1

@blakewaugh2536
4 hours ago
for looking out for others who aren’t ethnically from here, but put much more heart, effort, meaning, emphasis on integration and following the very values the place was built on? You would be disregarding the work that many non Europeans have done. Should we have the arguments about immigration? Yes, but not based on ethnicity, becasue that is the basis of prejudice. It will be, and it must be, VALUES first.

Hide replies

@redfinfisho
3 seconds ago
Imagine comparing Ireland with a population of 5 Million people to India with a population of 1.4 BILLION!! Also Irish people integrate perfectly into Australian culture and were never taking large proportions of welfare. Whilst Indians are not integrating, costing a fortune whilst disrespecting our country through littering, illegal dumping, polluting rivers just to scrape the surface.

@sarahs2764
8 hours ago
“Why are you saying a bunch?” – uhhh because thats actually whats happening

@Coke_Addiction
2 hours ago
The debate is between nature vs nurture. Is culture down stream of biology or is culture down stream of theology? It would be very difficult to argue that it is solely one sided. The people that do, cannot answer the generalisation once it gets broken down to the individual level.

@PixieTinsel
8 hours ago
If one of Sam’s kids breeds with an Anglo Indian Australian born kid then his grandchild will be a citizen but technically an Anglo Indian but if his other child breeds with the Aussie born child of Pommy immigrants then it’s Australian through and through tru blue….
1

@Howdnz
7 hours ago
We just need Jesus
2

@aussiegypsywarrior
6 hours ago
I totally agree. Sam especially needs Jesus. He has good values and would make such a good Christian. He’s not understanding where these 2 are coming from.

Hide replies

@lukemagro6060
7 hours ago
I see both sides and both seem completely valid in my mind. Yes I get called racist all the time. If we stop citizenship for a year, kick out all non citizens and replace abortion with truely anonymous adoption, financialy encourage big families and restart immigration limited to .1% of the population per year. Thats 10% over 100 years we can integrate that many to be just like us without loosing who we are (that’s still replacement in 1,000 years but a preserved culture. That’s 28,000 “heavily vetted skilled migrants” at 28 million population) do this and the difference in these opinions will be a moot point.

@matthewleonardi247
3 hours ago
Sam’s argument is flawed for example a lot of Bosnians are Muslim but are also from Europe so how would he seperate the two? Say they’re Aussie because they’re European? Or say they’re not because they’re Muslim?
It should purely be cultural, does your culture follow the western Christian modal? If not, would you become a Christian or at least follow our cultural norms to assimilate into Australia? If no , you can visit but you can’t live here.
1

@leonmiller4774
9 hours ago (edited)
SAM ANGLO CELTIC EUROPEAN IS WHITE don’t be so defetist as to not use the word white Jo is an Aussie she wasn’t born in India she was born in our mother country England so Jo is an Aussie i don’t care her skin colour and i am a WHITE AUSTRALIAN and my family has been here for a bloody lot longer than yours so who is Australian we are matey all 4 of us. I’m 7th generation Aussie so therefoe Aussie NOT German Australian ol’mate and you’re only 2nd generation so who is an Aussie i am. I speak Strine so do you that makes an Aussie anyway i hope you read all of my comments oh to Jo’s hubby the Greeks invented democracy our forebares created the Westminster system
If i want to go back far enough I’m a Viking on one side and a Germanic barbarian on the other side how far do you want to go back we all came from one family Adam and Eve
I have to disagree Christianity is not a white mans religion original Christians were from the Middle East (out of Israel), and Greece(olive skin colour) not white anglo-celtic European
4

@grannyannie2948
8 hours ago
I’m also seventh generation Australian on all my lines. Funnily this includes a German family escaping the wars of German unification in the mid 1800s.
1

@Snappernose
4 hours ago
She’s Indian/austalian
If I mirrored her life in China would they say I’m Chinese?
Didn’t think so
1

Hide replies

@blakewaugh2536
5 hours ago
How does federation being the coming together of all 5 states and territories, be the essence of who ethnically built this country? The Anglo’s started building the colonies but lets just say its ‘federation’ when it happened. History speaks for itself, so you obviously don’t understand history…
1

@batesmate5510
3 hours ago
53ish mins bro, bloke would’ve been on the ground for telling me to shut up in my own house

@DanAttewell-y5b
49 minutes ago
Who would you consider Australian, albo= no Sam thaiday=yes

@jasonwolfe5787
3 hours ago
51:13 Poor argument about irish immigration from 2008 to 2016. It was about 15k to 25k net migration from Ireland then compared to 150k to 250k from India. Still x more back then. Dr Jo is great but that was weak.

@southern-samurai
6 hours ago (edited)
What is an Australian? An Australian is one born here and descended from the host and founding ethnic group. It defines us as a Nation. What is happening now is pure replacement of people and culture, of Country itself. It is as bad as military invasion and takeover, only this is supported and promoted by our seditious government.

@flexo-c
3 hours ago (edited)
32:19 Completely disagree, indigenous people helped build this country, they have thousands of years of connection with it, they’ve made big strides in politics and art, helped shape our laws and culture, as much as I like Joanna she doesn’t have that ancestry connection, apart from a few notable figures Indian people and culture wasn’t really a part of what built this nation, but I’d say she’s become Australian, she’s spent her life here, built a family, she has an Aussie accent lmao, and from what I’ve seen she puts Australia first, that’s what it means. Like those old videos of Greek and Italian people, they moved here and assimilated, they saw Australia as the new country, they respected the culture, they built lives within it, became a part of it and are always so grateful to have had the opportunity to live in one of the best, safest places in the world

@maxyorke2453
3 hours ago
First of all, culture is inextricably linked to race. So Australian “culture” is race made manifest. I’ve never been so embarrassed as listening to James use leftist ideology to explain away what it means to be Australian. What a train wreck. Really tough listen.
This debate has been settled; now it’s time to fix the problem.
2

@Alessandro-b4k
33 minutes ago
Bro he is nailing you on the point that you can’t define an Australian, you need to work through that . An Australian is anyone who votes for ON, all you others fall short.

@darrenparsons5299
8 hours ago
And im not religious

@boags9098
8 hours ago
This is wicked

@jessiejordan2853
40 minutes ago
Sam, 100% agree with you but I don’t know why you’re using Federation in 1901 as the beginning of our foundation as people when we’ve been here for 240years.

@aussiegypsywarrior
7 hours ago
53 minutes

@scooter183
7 hours ago
Woman’s Sport.. I love Woman’s Beach Volleyball..

@RichardJohnson-nq9ys
8 hours ago
Calm down James or you will have a coronary.
1

@mannus7776
7 hours ago (edited)
Something to consider on the ethnicity versus culture discussion. The reason peoples from our ethnic background Sam built all this was because of the culture that they were immersed in, that being the Judeo-Christian belief system. And yes those two are inextricably linked, there can be no Christianity without there first being Judaism. The New testament relies on the Old and Jesus and the apostles were all jews. You cut Christianity off from Judaism and it’s a cut flower. In short it’s culture that determines destiny not ethnicity.
Ps Really enjoy your podcast, keep up the good work and keep thinking

@blakewaugh2536
4 hours ago
I’m absolutely pissed off that he took the Judeo bit out. If he wants to turn his back on a community that has not only integrated but done more for this country than many Anglo saxon or whatever he refers them to be, he can get fked and we must CALL this OUT for what it is. All we look for is to be regarded as Australian’s especially after Bondi. If he is putting all his eggs in the ‘lobby basket’ he can F OFF with that ideology. That is sincerely Anti Australia to a tee.

Hide replies

@slash1989
8 minutes ago
You dont need churches or Priests You can talk to god he will answer you if your serios

@saqaleka
9 hours ago
1:02:58 why did her response about deporting muslims get cut out?
2

@Trunka34
8 hours ago
Why do you think haha
1

@grannyannie2948
8 hours ago
She explains it in the comments
1

Hide replies

@MaryAnzac
7 hours ago
My family I married into are German/Polish they embraced the Australian culture and had children here.
They still classed themselves as Europeans that live Australia, their children are Australian as they are born here.
Anyone who comes to Australia and embraces Australian culture are Australian.
These new people who come here are not embracing Australian culture !
But I personally know people who come from Iran and are Christian and live in Australia with an Australian passport but they still see themselves as Persian!
This race debate and who is Australian is silly as we are Multi cultural country?

@johnryan1386
9 hours ago (edited)
This is the argument in the Uk, Everyone can be British but you cannot be English,Irish or Welsh etc.
James is confusing ethnicity and nationality, sounds like a leftist frankly!
My wife is Chinese and my daughter is half Australian and half Chinese, it’s pretty simple
9

@gogeorgia707
10 hours ago
Go Jo . Any fool knows abortion is murder. Admitting it – another story. Yes pregnancy can be sad, complicated when young, or risk. ‘ a psychopath looking down an ultrasound..” Hilarious but horrifying. Adopted children are loved . Needed like the air we breathe.
I was on the left too, then realised this is too important.
3

@grannyannie2948
10 hours ago
I can’t understand how any mother chooses this instead of placing the baby for adoption. Pure evil.
2

@gogeorgia707
8 hours ago
@grannyannie2948 life is so precious. We’ve clearly been misled. It’s a tragedy if someone is young and can’t afford the baby. But the joy they create can come either for themselves, or a family who will love them forever .
1

@grannyannie2948
8 hours ago
​ @gogeorgia707 Instead of paying migrants Centrelink, we should be ensuring that young couple have the resources they need if they decide to keep the baby. If not I’m sure there are 100,000 Aussies who would love to adopt a newborn.

Hide replies

@nam55A
9 hours ago
There’s a reason for these terminations. The choice isn’t easy.
1

@grannyannie2948
8 hours ago (edited)
Yes they do it because the government gives them taxpayers money for having a “stillbirth.” To engage in such a depraved level of evil a nd greed might be difficult for some. Though I doubt it.
1

@Kateeheel7
8 hours ago
Elaborate on these reasons?

Hide replies

@NicholasWitham
2 hours ago
James’ argument on 10,000 Christians from India or 10,000 randoms from France is great. Sam, it sounded like you were going to say you’d prefer the randoms from France.
Well I believe those randoms from France will have ideologies that go against the Australian way of life than the Christian Indians. I wonder that if you did go ahead and say you prefer the French 10,000….I’d like to hear your argument for that preference….because it does seem you’d prefer them because they are white.
I’m not calling you a racist or a nazi, just trying to point out that it seems there’s a gap there.
I do disagree with your definition being based on geography over ideals/morals/ethics etc, but will still continue to support you, keep it going Sam…cheers

@peterscudds7299
8 hours ago
I have a mate in the NT whose heritage is Afghan Aboriginal Chinese, he grew up in the bush and had no choice about his heritage. So according to Sam he’s 1/3 Australian. It’s not about race it’s about values. Oh and by the way do some research Sam and find out how many races of people make up Anglo-Celtic European origins. They’re not all white caucasian.
1

@domburton
5 hours ago
100 percent mate. He’s aussie as.

Hide replies

@blakewaugh2536
5 hours ago
So someone who comes here at the age of 4, doesn’t hold their traditional ethnic culture, grows up in Australia, is still classed as an Australian Indian because of her heritage? Well then clearly your definition is ethnically based because you want to separate someone’s ancestry that they left at the door but have done everything asked of them and integrated? Christ almighty!
1

@slash1989
59 minutes ago
Two against one not fair and there waxing

@marleymeathook1975
8 hours ago
i think lock the gates perid become a self sufficiant country we build grow make everything we need in this country. zero imigration until this happens. lets see how that goes.

@slash1989
47 minutes ago (edited)
I cant beleive Australian Government had a whites only Policy I am a white ozzy bourne here We will nut this out plan in progress God is KING

@julianshalders6047
6 hours ago
We broke from england in1901 and identified our selves as australians under parlimentary law. Its called federation. The immigrants do not reconise this.

@blakewaugh2536
4 hours ago
The Anglo’s helped found and build the colonies. So why is the definition then in federation, not when the same race that has been identifed, come here to commence work to make this a country? If he was consistent in definition, it would be that date, but i can see why he would say federation as a nation forming event. If we are to define it as that, we would have to look further back from that in defining that term. Just doesnt make sense to me…

Hide replies

@JohnClark-l5p
6 hours ago
At some point in the future Australia will be renamed

@4litrespoolyboi206
6 hours ago
42:41, bro just literally told his wife to shut up because she tried to speak…

@DrJoannaHowe
5 hours ago
If you listen to the whole thing, you’ll see that I also tell James to shut up. We have a very robust marriage. It’s not everyone’s cup of tea but it is our dynamic, and I’m fortunate to be married to an incredible man.
1

Hide replies

@sinaimbriano8317
7 hours ago
His trans argument is going against him, I think there’s a middle ground

@adensticher6842
13 minutes ago
You killed it Sam, the amount of times you repeated yourself was painful mate
1

@77Coddie
24 seconds ago
You’re all trying to define what is an Aussie on both an international and national view at the same time, the chick would be considered Aussie by a foreigner but an Indian-Australian to someone like Sam. Can we get this straight?

@darrenparsons5299
7 hours ago
WELL SAID JO
5

@victorgomes7585
2 hours ago
An Australian is anyone who’s been born here. They follow they respect and uphold culture and history. If their parents were born overseas the children are still Australian. Some Australians like to show great pride to the nationality of their foreign born parents. And this is because there’s not much pride in celebrating Australia anymore. We are shamed by government, bureaucrats, education system… there’s a globalist communist agenda. You guys were debating it at a superficial level. Anyone causing trouble and destruction over foreign issues in australia should go to jail!

@peterrichards1058
40 minutes ago (edited)
Multiculturalism policies and their definitions is the issue Sam .Australian identifies are defined by our Christian based values which define our Australian culture skin colour has nothing to do with.

@leonmiller4774
9 hours ago
Sam I’m sorry to say the one who loses their temper first has lost the argument and you did exactly that so sorry matey go take 10 stop lossing it then you may win your debate point
1

@jasonwolfe5787
8 hours ago
I thought James went 1st. I don’t think these things wouldn’t have really been as big an issue but across the west demographics are under attack. I don’t have an issue with organic immigration, but the horse has bolted and drastic action is needed.
1

Hide replies

@nunyaconsern5590
6 hours ago
This guy’s history sucks Christianity started in the west lol democracy start in England lol what’s he rambling about he should learn these things because it’s embarrassing if your going to talk about these things on a public forum
1

@APP1E5
4 hours ago
James has a good point. Half man half woman.

@neilrwatts
7 hours ago
It’s quite simple Sam, your birth certificate defines your country of origin, what you are debating is something totally different and I hope that one day you can step back and fully comprehend that.
I’m an English immigrant from 1966 and was 6 years old when we arrived in Australia. I’m a permanent resident who has grown up in Australia so rest assured that posses Australian values. I have been educated, worked here and paid my taxes on my taxes like every other Australian, I consider myself as an Aussie and would gladly die for this country. However unlike my mother and sister I am still yet to take out citizenship. I refuse to pay to accept citizenship as a piece of paper and a little tree doesn’t change the fact that I have already contributed and paid my way for this country.
I have two children and by your analogy they are British Australian just like your daughter.
I originally started listening to your podcasts as like many other Aussies (see what I did there, just joking) I am totally disgusted with what is happening to our retuned soldiers. I realise and accept that we all have different opinions in life and hope that we all accept the need to respect that but I do fear that your position on this his matter is playing into the he White Supremisisme debate.
Let’s be clear, not labelling you as one though.
Stay safe.
An old British Aussie.

@marleymeathook1975
8 hours ago
Idont think the immigration restriction act had nothing about WHITE in there

@Coke_Addiction
4 hours ago
Did the Chinese who came here gold rush build this country, Sam ?

@chrisdavis6436
1 hour ago
Love your stuff Sam but you are way off here .
What you are talking about is being born in Australian makes you indigenous to this country no matter who your parents are .
Joanne is Australian .
My family some come out on second fleet , I have welsh , English , Jewish blood in my line .
So I’m am white and that Anglo as they come .
Just a thought I live in country our family moved here from Sydney when I was 3 growing up we were accepted by locals . It took 20 years for us to be seen as a local and I accept that get used to living in area and fit in . Now we are the locals being here for almost 50 years .
Now I used this as to being Australian . I’ve been to India love many of people I met . But in Singapore at universal studios on holiday just chatting to people in the line of a ride because they looked Indian got chatting enjoying time . I asked where they were from thinking maybe India they said Sydney I went wow ok cool no problems there . But yes they are Indian I said how long lived in Australia they said 20 years . Aww your Australians
They were so happy a white man said they were Australians and proud and we kept chatting . Mate you need to adopt this view . Because you are not going prove what an Australian is by race .
I’ll tell you what Australian is defined .
And Australian is someone who lives in this Australia and loves this country for all its best and its worst but want to work towards making the flag , the anthem , our history and respect for it , you assimilate to the Australia law and way of life .
You can’t make it ethnic Australia doesn’t work like that . I agree with Joanne’s husband many people have built this country .
I’m still watching Sam you taking this way to far brother . And I think you are talking to wrong people and you do owe Joanne an apology she is Australian mate .
Still love your stuff and I’m sure you are one who would accept truth if it was put to you the right way . This maybe not the best conversation in this video because it’s not only heated but personal on all sides. I’m up for the debate if ya want bro

@overpotato4133
10 hours ago
This guy is clueless lmao
2

@JohnClark-l5p
6 hours ago
The only Australian is an Australian with an Australian accent

@suitathletics9074
4 hours ago
Australian born of European heritage and indigenous are “founding ethnic Australians” , thats the facts….just call it
“”founding Australians “ Sam…, the rest are Australian born Australians or Australian citizens…..time to freeze all Citizenships. James is right about christians but he just does not get it about founding Australians..which should be the majority ….but he seems like a decent guy… Joanna is culturally and spiritually Australian……. It is time re migration. Deportations. This is all the Govt’s fault. Bring back the 1980s demographic.

@maxyorke2453
3 hours ago
Notice how these ‘conservatives’ (Jo and James) actually keep using liberal/leftist arguments and also argue within the leftist moral framework? This is so important for people to understand. Even Sam occasionally argues within this leftist moral framework.
That’s what needs to be dismantled. Also the “what is an Australian?” debate shouldn’t be a debate any longer — it’s White Anglo-Celtic peoples, with additional broader European ancestry. Shut and closed discussion. Now the problems need to be fixed.
2

@samg8313
6 hours ago
Ok god squad, Christians will not just save this country because half the country are non religeous.

@jacoblowe4247
5 hours ago
By your own reasoning mate you have to call yourself English Australian and not just Australian because you originated from there. It’s so absurd, your arguments and definition fall apart with even the slightest stress test. What so if someone migrates from India to Germany, then has a child there and then that child grows up and migrates to Australia are they then indian-German-Australian and do they then fit into your classification of being “Anglo-Saxon, European” or whatever? Or would you not want that person to come to Australia because they are somehow not European because their heritage originates elsewhere. Then it becomes just a weird dive back in heritages and if we all go back far enough it’s Africa so I guess I’m an African-English-German-French-natural born Australian.
How about we just say that if you’re a citizen and you love our way of life and culture you’re an Australian and we should drastically reduce immigration so that no matter the colour of your skin or where you come from you can adapt to our way of life, which will of course evolve because we don’t want to live in a bloody stagnate culture. Gosh many other cultures have food culture far superior than ours and we should totally import some of that… Man acts like he hates a curry.
I think the words of Martin Luther King apply that a man should be judged not by the colour of his skin (or where their bloody heritage is from), but upon their character. Being Australian is a matter of character, not heritage. I know plenty of Australians hailing from other countries like South Africa for example who display a level of patriotism for this country that far exceeds that of basically any leftist activist who consistently whine about our Australian heritage and values. Despite many of these activists being however many generation Australians I’d argue they are demonstrably less Australian then our proud Australians who have come from South Africa.
Do South Africans fit in your “Anglo European” categories? What about indigenous South Africans? Be careful how you answer to not make it about the colour of one’s skin hey…
Sorry “bro” but your views
fall apart with even the slightest pressure test.
1

@jacoblowe4247
5 hours ago
And like bro how many generations in your mind does one no longer be say Indian Australian and just become Australian? You said Joanna’s kids are half Indian half Australian…. So after 10 generations that’s like 10% Indian and 90% Australian right? So you reckon you can define Australian, so what is a 90% Australian, how are they different than 100% Australian? Are you not 100% Australian because of your British heritage, so like 90% yourself? Genuinely curious…
1

@grannyannie2948
5 hours ago
Australia federated in 1901 to implement the White Australia Policy. In the 1970s this was changed without a referendum. It can be argued Australia as a nation nolonger exists as the federal government nolonger serves its purpose.
1

@jacoblowe4247
4 hours ago
​ @grannyannie2948 so you’re saying the Australian government should exist to keep Australia white? That if you aren’t white you shouldn’t be Australian? Holy smokes that’s racist. I think most people these days subscribe to the superior ideology that things should be determined based upon the content of one’s character and not the colour of their skin. I’m sorry you’re stuck in the past pre Martin Luther King era.
1

@grannyannie2948
3 hours ago (edited)
​​​​ @jacoblowe4247 To be fair the federal government did have another purpose. It was to build a navy capable of defending the country. This has also been a failure.
I am saying no more than what was taught in history classes in the 80s. I have since read extensively on the subject and on constitutional law and facts don’t care about your feelings. This immigration policy was extremely popular. Their were pop songs written about it in the 1890s and early 1900s.
The reasons were not what you imagine. One was that sugar cane farmers in Queensland indentured servants from Pacific islands. These were virtual slaves. Australians hated this.
At this period Australia was the wealthiest country in the world. We also had the highest wages. History had taught Australians that Asians in particular, undercut wages. (Yes the WAP was left winged, unions etc. ). We were also an early democracy. All the states were self governing democracies, where even the working class could vote. To put this in proportion, the working class could not vote in Britain until after WW1. It was feared that collectivist cultures could corrupt our democracy.
My father collected antiques. Australian antique furniture is often marked with a stamp, saying, made with European labour. This was to show the workers were paid high wages. This continued into the 1950s.

@jacoblowe4247
2 hours ago
​ @grannyannie2948 a very long winded way of saying you are racist and a fan of parts of our history that were racist. Are you also a fan of the murder of indigenous Australians and them having less human rights that is also a sordid part of our history? Just because Australia had a prosperous time during its white Australia policy does not make it the morally correct approach for the future… America was pretty prosperous during slavery, doesn’t mean we should pull that ol’ one back out, jeez. Once again it should be about the content of one’s character not the colour of their skin or their heritage, otherwise it would be racist. It’s not that hard.

Hide replies

@slash1989
1 hour ago
If you leave islam you could be assasinated by shari law

@jessiejordan2853
24 minutes ago
Joanna, I like you but you’re not understanding what you’re asking of Australians like me.
My great great great great grandparents were BORN in Australia.
My most recent ancestor to migrate here arrived before Federation.
You’re not “just as Australian” as me, and it absolutely diminishes and trivialises everything that my family and our people endured and overcame over generations when you claim you are.

@adzshez
3 hours ago
Identity politics are lame. Dont break up the right with this crap.

@crankin77
2 minutes ago
Aboriginals were born in Australia so they’re Australian. It’s not that hard.

@clintanthony1779
1 hour ago
Sorry James, I really like you and Jo mate but you’re wrong in regards to what an Australian is. Totally wrong. And the nazi/racist name tag is nothing but a silencing tactic for when you’ve got no argument.
1

@MSummaz
54 minutes ago
Bullshit! Is Sam an Australian/Australian? Just asking questions….

Hide replies

@darrenparsons5299
7 hours ago
Jo n james overwelming win sorry sam
2

@simdavis4830
5 hours ago
Sam was an atheist until 5 minutes ago, changes his views
like he changes his jox. I’m a Christian and the old testament is Jewish, the new testament is Christian hence the terminology Judeo Christian not all that difficult. Sam isn’t a Nazi but he is seriously brushing up against it with his crappy non thought out positions.
1

@MSummaz
14 minutes ago
I couldn’t agree more…

Hide replies
Top is selected, so you’ll see featured comments

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: Welcome to the show tonight. [14th of November, 2024] Neither Tom nor Blair are here yet. Blair said he was going to be late. I don’t know exactly what’s happening with Tom. I think he’ll be on in a second.

 

But as you can see here I’ve got the “Your Body My Choice” T-shirt on in solidarity with Nick Fuentes’s total beatdown of the BPD jewish feminist that came to his house. Apparently the pepper spray that he sprayed in this crazy bitch’s face was kind of weak.

 

So, that’s what she said. So maybe he needs to get a better brand of pepper spray. Maybe he could ask Victoria Police for some advice?

 

But, you know, nevertheless, it was pretty funny. So anyway, I thought I’d wear the gimmick shirt. But hey, anyway, how you guys going this evening? Welcome to the show. Like I said the boys will be on shortly. I think Tom will be on any second now, and then Blair will be on a bit later. And there’s a few things I wanted to get into, probably when at least have one of them to join me.

 

So let me see, someone said here in the chat, by the way:

 

“Why do Nazis need to necessarily control women?”

 

It’s about abortion.

 

I mean, thing about the abortion thing is, abortion’s disgusting, but at the same time, I don’t think it should be the priority like in our politics, like in particular in America. I mean, quite frankly, you know, abortion is disproportionately performed by blacks, and it kind of culls the black population in a certain way.

 

Now, it’s pretty distasteful in a purely White, ethno-state, virtuous society, I don’t think we should really be having abortion. But is it really the priority? Like, should we be going after abortion first before we fix immigration, before we re-establish White rule? I don’t think so. I think it’s a very low priority.

 

But it’s funny! It was funny in the aftermath of the American election to see all these fat communist women, libtard women, proclaiming that they were not going to have sex with any man for the entirety of the Trump administration. Like as if the dudes were just lining up to slam these land whales! I found it quite humorous. It’s just a bit of a joke.

 

Anyway, it’s a bit of fun.

 

So here’s a story that I want to talk about actually, because it’s actually got an interesting context. I spoke to the editor over at The Noticer about this. So this is a story that was published today:

 

“Students punished for calling ‘trans’ teacher ‘sir’ at a high school taken over by radical gender ideology.”

 

Now this is from Richmond High School in, it’s in Greater Sydney. If you know Sydney, you know Richmond. It’s not the Richmond in Melbourne, it’s the Richmond in Sydney. But apparently one of the teachers there has turned out, has become a so-called “transformer”, if you will, is wearing a, … It’s a dude in a dress, right? It’s a dude in a dress. Some freak in a dress.

 

Anyway, so he’s obviously been demanding that the students all refer to him by the correct pronouns. And you know, as you can imagine there’s a lot of young boys there that aren’t going to vibe with that. So they’re refusing to go along with that. And they’re getting pulled before the principal’s office and so on and threatened with expulsion from this high school just because they won’t call the teacher Ms instead of Mrs. Sorry, Ms instead of Mr or Sir. I’ll read some of the article here, actually:

 

“Photos provided to Noticer News by students at Richmond High School northwest of Sydney show far-Left transgender propaganda posters produced by LGBT Youth advocacy group Minus 18 placed around the school. The teenagers said that pins promoting so-called transgenderism have also been handed out to teachers to wear and they’ve been threatened with suspension for complaining about the posters despite 80% of the student body being opposed to pro-LGBT material being put on display at their school. One of the large posters says: ‘All genders, identities, expressions, pronouns welcome here’ while another titled ‘Your identity is awesome’ provides unscientific radical Leftist definitions of so-called ‘LGBTQIAs identities.’”

 

You know, as you can see here in this image. A quote from one of the students.

 

“It seems as if the entire school has changed within the last year and the community is very unhappy about this,’ a student told Noticer News, adding that many of his peers and teachers were upset about having ‘views forced on [them] that they don’t agree with’.”

 

So apparently, by the way, according to the editor at Noticer News, the students at the school were advised by one of their teachers, I guess, who they trust, to reach out to Noticer News and provide these quotes. So obviously we’ve got some White nationalists, perhaps of some description that are embedded within the school there. So that’s pretty cool! A bit of a culture war brewing:

 

“The student says that changes began when a male teacher quote came out as trans and administrators began to threaten students for using the wrong pronouns. And now it felt like the whole school had been quote, ‘taken over’. To quote the student in September, ‘I greeted the teacher who I knew before he started to claim to be a woman with ‘Good day, sir’, which seems like a normal thing to say straight after, you know, he gets pulled out of class and reprimanded, etc.”

 

But threatened, not just with threatened to be expelled from the entire high school because he won’t go along with his nonsense! And yeah, just as you can see, predictable shit like the school just trying to force this nonsense down their throat.

 

Anyway, this is a Noticer News exclusive, so I thought bring attention to it. It is quite interesting, like a little bit of culture war playing out at an Australian high school.

 

[07:50]

 

Also a couple hours ago I replied to Senator Malcolm Roberts on Twitter. You know, I do make a habit of kind of trying to be part of the conversation with a lot of these politicians, particularly the ones that are the so-called, you know, Right-wing, our guys. Not really, but you know, the so-called our guys.

 

And anyway, I just left some, … Let me read out my response actually, because it is kind of interesting because he reacted to me and agreed with what I said. So people say:

 

“Ah this vote harder ism is the problem, you know, National Socialism or nothing!”

 

And obviously I agree with that principle. Obviously I agree with that principle.

 

But when it comes to injecting ourselves into the political conversation, sometimes you have to engage with it with a certain amount of good faith. And so we don’t have anyone running in the next election. As I’ve said we would. Our ambition is to have people running the election after the federal, not the next federal election, which will be, I think they’re saying, between March and May next year, the Australian election. It’s too soon for us to do it properly. We could do it, but we wouldn’t be able to do it properly.

 

Whereas if we wait till the next cycle, I think we can do it properly. But until we have our guys running in the election, well, what are we supposed to do? Just sit it out or try and engage with it in some way? Try and move the origin window, try and have an impact.

 

And so the two kind of parties that are to the right of the Liberal Party, which obviously I think are going to win the election, but obviously we’re not satisfied with. We’re not satisfied with the Liberal Party that are cuckservatives in every way shape and form, barely indistinguishable from the Left, frankly. But the two options therefore really at the national level is One Nation and the Libertarians. And they’ve both got problems, the Libertarians, well, their problem is that they’re libertarians so they’re not nationalists. They do have a lot of good policies on many issues though. They’re pretty solid on free speech and gun rights and so on. But to be fair, so are One Nation. They don’t seem to do the Zionist thing. I haven’t really heard the Libertarian Party say much about that either way. They just seem to avoid the subject.

 

I saw John Ruddick, the elected representative in New South Wales, get interviewed by a nationalist, which I mentioned on the show a couple weeks ago, I think, and he basically stated that he supports in Australia First, you know, foreign policy where we don’t meddle in the affairs of faraway countries. Explicitly called out, I think the Iraq war as something that he was opposed to. So that was a pretty good sign.

 

However, when it came, when it comes to One Nation we see Pauline Hanson, you know, bending over backwards to prostrate herself before the Zionist lobby and prove how pro-Israel she is. And, it’s pretty disgusting! But we’re not America. So it’s a bit less of an issue here than in America, where America, it’s very decisive because ultimately that’s where the decisions get made around that kind of thing and we just kind of get dragged along with the Americans.

 

So that’s a win for the Libertarian Party.

 

But then on immigration, traditionally you would think One Nation would have a better immigration policy and that’s the most important policy. So you would think you would lean more towards one nation. But John Ruddick said in that interview also that the Libertarians would support a five year immigration moratorium, meaning five years, complete shut borders, no one coming in for five years. I’m sure there might be some exceptions to that I don’t know, marriage visas or something like that, but basically shut the borders. And that’s more radical than the One Nation proposal, which is Net Zero, meaning we only let in the amount of people that we let out, which is about. Or that leave. It’s not about let out. Obviously you’re free to leave. So it’s about 70,000, I think, a year leave Australia and move to another country.

 

And so that way, like there would be basically one in, one out policy, which obviously is a lot better than the one that we currently have, but it’s still not exactly good enough because some of those ones out are going to be White and some of those ones in are going to be brown. So that’s not ideal. Right. If it was one in, one out, but they had to be White, then that’s a great policy. But they didn’t have any stipulations like they have to come from a Western country or anything like that.

 

So if they change the policy to something like that, obviously I’d be more supportive.

 

[12:44]

 

But, you know, neither of them are talking about sending the people back that are already here. You know, you’ve got, I think, 2.4 million people living in Australia on temporary visas, meaning they aren’t permanent residents, they aren’t citizens, they’re on some kind of classification of temporary visa. And a massive portion of that, I think about a million almost, are on student visas, which is just ridiculous! Particularly considering that we’re in a housing crisis. The university system is basically a giant rort.

 

Like a lot of these international students, they aren’t really students, they just sign up to some educational institution in order to get the visa, then don’t really study and they’re just like some Indian that comes in and then goes and starts driving Uber, eats and then tries to use that as a way to stay in the country.

 

Also, there’s hundreds of thousands of people in Australia estimated to be overstaying their visa, so they’re technically illegal immigrants. So they all need to be round up and deported.

 

Then you’ve got a million people here on student visas. Frankly, they should all just be cancelled and all sent back and not renewed and they shouldn’t be extended to anyone else. If you did that immediately, you’re sending, you know, one point something million, mostly brown people back out of Australia. The housing crisis would reset, wages would start growing, rents would start coming down. It would be a massive relief economically to the average Australian’s quality of life. But also the demographics of the country would improve. A lot of brown faces would be saying:

 

“See you later.”

 

So that’s something that I would support, but no one’s talking about it.

 

Obviously the Liberal Party must be getting funded in some way by lobby groups. We know for a fact that they’re getting funded by the property lobby that benefits from this policy. We know that they’re getting funded by the financial lobby which benefits from basically increasing property prices because everyone has to go and get a mortgage that’s even bigger to be able to buy a house. So that benefits the financial services industry. And then also big business corporate lobbyists also like immigration because it drives down the cost of wages.

 

So they’re all funding the Liberal Party campaign which is why they’ll try and act like they’re strong on immigration. But if you look at what they’ve actually concretely promised, I think it’s something like a 25% reduction on the already ridiculous record breaking immigration levels under Labor, which are more than double what they were under the previous Liberal government.

 

So what the Liberals are basically promising is not even to go back to the immigration levels under them before Covid when the last Liberal government was in charge and we had like a normal, like the pre-Covid because obviously during Covid the borders were shut and so that did reduce immigration.

 

But it wasn’t because, immigration wasn’t reduced because of as a policy, it was just a temporary thing because of Covid.

 

So they’re not even promising to go back to that. They’re saying we’ll go down 25% so they’re still going to be way above where they were before, and that’s what they’re promising. Will they actually deliver that? I don’t actually have faith in the Liberal Party to deliver that. Like the Labor government promised to reduce it even more than that and did the opposite.

 

So how can you trust either of these scumbags? You know, you just can’t!

 

So the Liberals basically are going to do nothing about immigration, more or less. We might as well just write it off entirely. They need to be pressured from the Right and obviously their policies are better. These are the kind of smaller Right-wing parties which between them will get if they campaign well, 15% of the vote between them I would predict if they campaign well.

 

So it’s a serious amount and the Liberals are probably going to win the election and there’s going to be a balance of power in the Senate that these smaller Right-wing parties might control. Very likely they could control.

 

So if they control that balance of power in the Senate then they’re going to have some leverage. So it is kind of relevant and important, like what their policies are, not just for, like the metapolitics of how they pressure the system, but also they have some leverage potentially and over the next government that they could exercise. Like the Greens exercise their leverage over the Labor government in a similar way to get a few concessions.

 

So, yeah, that means that if they want my endorsement and my endorsement obviously counts for something, then they’re going to have to try and win my endorsement. There’s a competition. And that’s how everyone needs to kind of play it. Like, in my opinion, as a movement, we say:

 

“Look, win us over. What we care about is immigration. Whoever’s going to go out there and fight hardest on immigration, you know, you’ll get our votes. And if no one fights on immigration, we’ll just sit out the election entirely. And if you both fight, we’ll try and pick the one that fights harder and gives us more.”

 

That’s a smart, transactional way of approaching this kind of thing. So that’s my approach.

 

I don’t actually anticipate that they’re going to give us very much at all! So I’m probably going to sit out the election entirely. But there’s a, you know, I’ll flirt with it, I’ll flirt with it. I’ll dance with the, with the, these politicians and we’ll see what they give us. If they just give us crumbs, they can go fuck themselves, if they want to give us something concrete, …

 

[18:12]

 

But anyway. So I responded to Malcolm Roberts and let me just pull it up so I can get up exactly what the conversation was. So he made a tweet which was:

 

“Albanese has let 393, 874 migrants arrive in Australia to September this year. This is the largest amount of arrivals for the first nine months of a year ever! This is why you can’t afford a house or find a rental!”

 

I mean, yeah, that’s true. I responded saying:

 

“You’re right to attack the government, but you should also be attacking the Liberals harder. They aren’t proposing anything close to the scale of immigration cuts necessary and they aren’t proposing the temporary Visa cancellations and deportations we badly need. Push harder, Malcolm!”

 

I really detest Pauline Hanson. Roberts does seem a bit better than her. I’m not saying I’m a Malcolm Roberts fan. You know, I’m not voting for it. I can’t vote for him anyway, I’m not from Queensland. But he does seem to be better, the better one in the party. Anyway, he responded saying:

 

“Agreed, Dutton has proposed a minor change to permanent visas per year. He has said nothing about temporary NOM which is adding to the 2.5 million TPV already in the country every year.”

 

TPV obviously is Temporary Visa holders. No, I’m obviously, I don’t know what that acronym means, but obviously has something to do with ones that are being proposed to issue in the future.

 

Anyway, it was a good response. So I said:

 

“Anti-immigration sentiment is the main reason why Aussies vote one nation. That’s just true. And you should be taking more votes of the Liberals than you currently are.”

 

Also true. I criticise them. You know, in the Queensland election they barely attacked the Liberals, they are attacking Labor and I understand that Labor is in government but frankly One Nation is competing with the Liberals for the Right-wing vote. They might get some votes off the Labor Party but they’re generally competing with the Liberals for voters.

 

So yeah, fine, attack Labor but you need to attack the Liberals just as hard, if not harder. And the fact that they don’t, it’s fundamentally suspect.

 

Which is why I speculated like are they a Liberal Party op? Do they exist as just like an extra wing of the Liberal Party to feed preferences into the Liberal Party? It’s entirely possible. Because obviously the way that preferential voting works in this country is that if you, because we have the temporary runoff system.

 

So if you have an electorate and say you’ve got like five candidates, well, the candidates that come first and second, if neither of them get 50% then the preferences from the candidates that get less votes filter into one or the other of the candidates depending on which one is preferenced higher or lower and then that ultimately produces the result. So One Nation feeds a lot of preferences into the Liberal Party, frankly.

 

And so they basically help the Liberals get elected. And Pauline Hanson came out and celebrated Liberals getting elected more or less, like in an indirect way immediately after the election.

 

But anyway, as I said here:

 

“And if you would make attacking their piss-weak policies on immigration and the student and family visa rorts your campaign focus, you would be taking more votes.”

 

So that’s just true.

 

So let’s see if he takes it to heart if they start going hard or if he starts going hard on student visas. And the family visa rort thing is also a thing like one jeet will get a visa whether they be a Refugee or some kind of working visa or whatever. And then they’ll drag in their parents not just the wife and kids, but their parents, their et cetera. And then all of a sudden, brothers, sisters, whatever. And all of a sudden we have this giant like family of jeets for like one guy. They say:

 

“Oh, we need to get more engineers into the country. Here’s one jeet that got a bullshit engineering degree from some bullshit like Indian university that probably can’t even do his job properly. This is going to help the economy so much and the country so much. We’ve got to get him in. So let’s get it. Bring him in!”

 

And then he brings his like retired Boomer Indian parents over who then just sit on Centrelink and collect benefits and collect Medicare and so on. And then brings in all these children who need to then go through our school system and so on. So then taxpayers just have to like dump hundreds of thousands of dollars a year onto this family of like parasites, which is probably more than the guy is even earning as a wage. And this is benefiting us how? This is contributing to our economy, how?

 

The whole thing is fucking ridiculous!

 

But yeah, so anyway, it was nice that he responded. I mean, Craig Kelly has responded to me before, but it was like an argument about race realism. But it’s good when the politicians respond. I do appreciate it. Even if they want to argue, at least have a conversation because yeah, frankly, a lot of the political, …

 

Like this week, two different journalists, one from Channel 7 and one from the ABC, contacted me to interview me and then pulled out when I agreed to it. And this has happened with many other journalists from others, whether it be newspapers or television channels or whatever, some even from overseas. So many times. I don’t think it’s the journalists themselves. I think what happens is that like maybe a journalist that’s like a low Ranking journalist goes:

 

“Well this is interesting look at what all these Nazis are doing.”

 

Then obviously not supportive. Like usually the journalists that contact me aren’t even White. They’ll go:

 

“Oh, this is interesting, an interesting story.”

 

And they probably want to write a hit piece like attacking me in some way. But I’ll agree to it, you know, I’ll give comment, why not? Let’s get some exposure.

 

[24:22]

 

And then they obviously put it before the editors and is like:

 

“Oh, here’s my idea, I’m going to go and interview Joel Davis or whatever.”

 

And they’re like:

 

“No, fuck!”

 

Like, they just like pull the pin. So that’s the strategy and it’s the strategy of a lot of people in Australian politics is to run away from having a discussion, or a disagreement or an argument, or a debate with me. Many run, few will front up.

 

That’s one good thing about Drew Pavlou. At least Drew Pavlou will have a debate. Like Drew Pavlou, he has this kind of weird ego complex where he won’t block anyone on Twitter and he’ll show up and like debate on the Elijah Schaffer show and everything and get embarrassed in front of hundreds of thousands of people. Not many other people in Australian politics will do that. So I like that about Drew. Like he’s so narcissistic that he ends up being useful.

 

But yeah, I highly doubt many other figures in Australian politics have the minerals to front up and debate me for two hours. I really do, because I’d smoke them! And they’re obviously intimidated. And that’s obviously one of the reasons why the journalists suppress any kind of interviews of me or whatever as well. Because they don’t want to have competent, … They do it to the other guys in the organisation as well. They don’t want us to have competent reply. They always want to frame it as just like a hit piece, take our comments, you know, out of context.

 

There’s been times where my comments have made the media when I’ve been in public at some event and then the media has interviewed me and they’ve played it on television or they’ve put it in a news article. But generally speaking, like whenever it’s planned and they have time to think about it, they always just, … It gets kiboshed. You know, the, like ZOG [Zionist Occupied Government] comes in is like:

 

“No, you can’t publish those quotes!”

 

So anyway, my point is its nice to be in the conversation as much as possible because it adds legitimacy and fundamentally my views are very reasonable. My views are more reasonable than pretty much all of the mainstream politicians. They just never get subjected to the right kinds of critical scrutiny.

 

Another issue in Australian politics that has been interesting. I’ll cycle through this as well before Tom gets here because he’ll be here soon.

 

Another issue in Australian politics recently which has been a positive development is, and we talked about this on the show last year a lot. There’s been a lot of discussion about it online recently because it’s been going through the Parliament. It’s the so-called Misinformation and Disinformation Bill, also known as the MAD Bill, which is a good name. And the bill, if you don’t know about it, basically what the Bill is, it enables a department within the Australian government called ACMA*, which is like the Department of Communications, basically to have authority over the regulatory practises of social media companies to basically impose their regulatory standards. So to be able to go to Twitter and Facebook and Instagram and so on, and say “this kind of discussion can’t be allowed on your platform”.

 

[* The Australian Communications and Media Authority is an Australian government statutory authority within the Communications portfolio. ACMA was formed on 1 July 2005 with the merger of the Australian Broadcasting Authority and the Australian Communications Authority. ACMA is responsible for collecting broadcasting, radiocommunication and telecommunication taxes, and regulating Australian media.]

 

And then if you look at the criteria for what constitutes so-called misinformation and disinformation, it’s ridiculous! Like, a lot of the stipulations in there basically enable them to shut down any kind of critical discussion of various government policies, like health policies, environmental policies, economic policies.

 

But in addition to that, they also say “harm”. But then if you look at the definition of harm within the legislation, harm is defined by a whole series of, … Actually, I’ll pull up the exact legislation here and I’ll read it out for you guys, because basically, more or less, it could ban basically everything that I say on the Internet because you could classify it according to how vague this is so, yeah:

 

“Misinformation and disinformation both have a provision in this Bill which is that it is reasonably likely to cause or contribute to serious harm. According to the definition of these terms. Harm means any of the following. (A) hatred against a group in Australian society on the basis of ethnicity, nationality, race, gender, sexual orientation, age, religion or physical or mental disability.”

 

How do you define that? That could basically mean advocating for White nationalism equals hatred. Therefore all of our shit needs to be banned!

 

There’s other stipulations here, like:

 

“Harm to the health of Australians, harm to the Australian environment.”

 

So doing harm to the health of Australians, like during Covid would that mean if you criticise the vaccine, they could say:

 

“Oh, that’s bad public health misinformation!”

 

And just like, ban it:

 

“Economic or financial harm to Australians.”

 

Like, so what does that mean? Like, if you go out and say:

 

“Hey, the economy is a Ponzi scheme, like, we’re in a per capita recession, the whole economy is propped up by mass immigration and financial usury and so on.”

 

What is that undermining public faith in the economy? Is all that discussion supposed to be banned?:

 

“Harm to the integrity of Australian democratic processes or of Commonwealth, state, territory or local government institutions.”

 

What does that mean? Like, just any criticism of the government itself, like, as a legitimate entity.

 

So this definition is so expansive, as I said, it could literally ban our entire political viewpoint. But not just our political viewpoint. Like almost any critical viewpoint from any position along the political spectrum could be just banned under the arbitrary whims of a bureaucracy.

 

So obviously that’s completely ridiculous and intolerable! How can that be?

 

[30:33]

 

 

Anyway, the good news is it did pass the House of Representatives, which is controlled by Labor, unfortunately. But Labor doesn’t control the Senate. There’s 76 Senators. I think Labor only has like 24. You need 39 to pass a bill. Now the Greens have like six and they’re tipped to support it. So that bumps their numbers up. And then there’s a maybe I’m getting the number slightly wrong here.

 

But basically on the No side, you have the Liberals who have come out against it. One Nation, Ralph Babet, who posted the N word on Twitter this week, which was kind of funny, speaking of Australian Senators and their Twitter antics. And a few of these of the other Independents. So according to everyone who has committed to voting against it, I think there’s 36 Senators that have committed to voting against it, and 36 Senators that have committed to voting for it. That is under the assumption that all the Green Senators and Labor Senators are going to vote for it. And there’s like four undecided Senators.

 

The undecided Senators are Jacqui Lambie. What’s that vile woman’s name, who used to be in the Greens, Lidia Thorpe. But she’s made some statements against it. She’s kind of like a loose cannon. She could go against it. That Muslim woman who left the Labor Party and is now independent. Payman, I believe her name is. She wears the hijab and she had that, like, cringe speech in the Senate where she tried to use all that Zoomer speak. That was probably the most cringe thing that’s ever happened in the history of Australian Parliament. And Senator [David] Van, who was in the Liberal Party, but then there was some kind of scandal where apparently he sexually assaulted some other member, like some staffer or something. Van has made statements that maybe he would support the bill, which is a shame.

 

But the other three have made statements that they’re critical. So if two out of those three or two out of those four go against the bill, the bill’s killed. And, yeah, so it’s looking like the Bill is going to suffer. They keep, like, avoiding the vote. I saw a lot of articles come out yesterday saying the Bill could be killed, basically. So I saw Australians versus the Agenda. They had like a list of all the Senators contact details that I just mentioned on their social media. So go check out their Telegram or their Twitter and you can like email the Senators and like tell them to vote against it or whatever if you want to do some, like, civic activism.

 

It seems like the pressure campaign against it is actually working because Pocock, who used to be a Wallaby rugby player who got elected, and some other Senator, I can’t remember her name, from Tasmania, they both came out against it on free speech grounds, said they’ll vote against it, and said that, well they’ve got a lot of public outcry against the bill.

 

Also, there was a poll that was done. And the poll, basically it had a lot of people that didn’t know whether they supported it or not, but 52% of people were against the Bill and only like 17 supported it and then the rest are undecided. So it’s clearly like really unpopular.

 

So hopefully that Bill gets killed because if that gets passed, it could pose a big problem. We might be kind of dependent upon the social media companies themselves telling the Australian government to get fucked or the American government, you know, imposing their regulations and kind of big dogging the Australian government. Otherwise, and I don’t really want to be dependent on the whims on either of those whimsical. That’s the situation.

 

But anyway. Blair, how you doing?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I made it! Sorry I was late tonight, guys. I just had a late client and things didn’t work out the way I planned. I intended to get home sooner. What does your T-shirt say, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: It says, “Your body, my choice”.

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that in reference to the video I saw of Nick Fuentes?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly!

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s the story with that? You might have been through it already, but who was that woman who went to his house?

 

Joel Davis: Maybe I could play the video. There’s like a video of it that was filmed from her phone so we could play it.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know anything about the circumstances surrounding that incident. Did he know who she was? I don’t know.

 

Joel Davis: So basically what happened was on the night of the election, of the American election, Fuentes made a tweet when it was clear that Trump would win, saying, “Your body, my choice”. Because obviously, like the catchphrase of the pro-choice feminists around the abortion issue is, “My body, my choice”. So he was kind of, it’s like a play on words because obviously it has a kind of like rape implication, but it doesn’t mean that it’s kind of like, cheeky because it doesn’t actually mean that. It just basically means the democratic will of the people, the collective, like, morality of society is preventing you from killing your own child.

 

So you can look at it in different ways, but either way, it made the feminists freak out, which was funny. And the tweet went super viral. And Fuentes also had a rant on his show that became like, TikTok viral and got millions and millions of views and lots of responses and all these media articles got played.

 

[36:28]

 

And so the feminists, because there’s all these feminists in America that they’re like, fat, putrid, disgusting! That are coming out and saying:

 

“I’m not going to have sex with anyone for the entire Trump presidency because my rights have been taken off me and I’m punishing men!”

 

And then it’s just like:

 

“Yeah, like, no one wanted to fuck you anyway, bitch!”

 

[chuckling] Or like everyone’s, conservatives, and they’re like:

 

“Yeah, we don’t want you having casual sex with random dudes anyway. Like, why don’t you get married and have sex with your husband and actually be like an upstanding woman, rather than a whore!”

 

So, it’s kind of funny. It’s like the seed.

 

But anyway, he had a rant which was just kind of rubbing it into the feminists, going on about how like:

 

“A woman will never be president. You know, the glass ceiling is like paved over with bricks!”

 

Because obviously this is the second woman that Trump has [chuckling] now beaten in succession, I guess, like if you kind of skip over the Biden one. And so, yeah, anyway, so this, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Did he know this girl who’s coming to his door?

 

Joel Davis: The feminists got really upset at Fuentes and they doxed his home address and posted it all over Twitter. I saw his address all over Twitter. And they were like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But who is this woman who went to his house?

 

Joel Davis: This is just some random jewish woman who’s like, she looks, you look at her face. She looks like a BPD*. Like a post menopausal fat BPD [Borderline Personality Disorder] woman in her early 50s or something. And she’s jewish.

 

[* Borderline personality disorder is a personality disorder characterized by a pervasive, long-term pattern of significant interpersonal relationship instability, a distorted sense of self, and intense emotional responses. People diagnosed with BPD frequently exhibit self-harming behaviours and engage in risky activities, primarily due to challenges regulating emotional states to a healthy, stable baseline. Wikipedia]

 

Blair Cottrell: Is she a journalist? What was her intention going there?

 

Joel Davis: She’s just like some feminist that just saw his dox and just, she’s just crazy! Went to harass him.

 

Blair Cottrell: Wow! And well, let’s see what happens.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Woman: Hi. Oh my God! What are you doing?

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s he doing? Kicking her? What’s he doing? He took her phone. Okay.

 

Joel Davis: Basically he maced her in the face. I think he like kicked her and then grabbed her phone, told her to get the fuck out of his house and then like started like smashing the phone underneath his foot or something. [Blair barely able to control himself from bursting out laughing]

 

But then the police showed up and made him give the phone back.

 

Blair Cottrell: Has he been charged or interviewed in relation to it? Like, does that mean I don’t know what happens in America? Are you allowed to do that in America?

 

Joel Davis: I think. So I mean, I don’t know what the, … I guess we’ll see because she said she’s going to press charges, but she, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Did he pepper spray her at the start? Is that capsicum spray he used?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But she said that the pepper spray was kind of weak. So I said earlier in the show that he maybe get on the phone to Vic Pol and get a recommendation for some high quality shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, the stuff Victoria Police uses down here is definitely not weak. [chuckling] Yeah, yeah.

 

Joel Davis: But anyway. But thing is that she was apparently at the front of his house for ages, yelling, shit, being hysterical. So like, so he’s sitting in his house. His address has been posted all over social media and it’s America!

 

Blair Cottrell: So it’s like he wasn’t just sitting there with Mace waiting for someone to knock on his door. She’d already made herself known.

 

Joel Davis: His address has been posted all over the Internet and all these people are posting:

 

“I’m gonna go over to Nick Fuentes’s house and like fuck with him or whatever.”

 

So he’s probably already like on edge.

 

And then this is crazy, like fat jewish woman, like being hysterical in his front yard. And then she comes up to the house and starts like hitting the doorbell. So I guess, you know, mace out, like, move quickly.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I suppose he felt threatened. Right? This woman’s at the front of his house. He doesn’t know who she is. She’s probably screaming out his name and all sorts of harassment, you know, comments that could be construed as harassment. Then she actually comes to the door.

 

So I don’t know. I think he’s within his rights to capsicum spray her.

 

Joel Davis: That in my opinion, he’s within his rights to do it.

 

I mean, at the end of the day, she’s on his property. So like. And she’s there to harass him. Like she’s there to fuck with him in some ways. So he can do what he likes.

 

Blair Cottrell: He would definitely be charged in Australia. You couldn’t do something like that in Australia. But no, America has all these what is it, the First Amendment rights, you have the right to defend yourself and your property or something?

 

Joel Davis: The Second Amendment says is the right to defend, to bear arms. It’s not the right to self defence. Self defence is protected through legislation. I don’t know what the specific laws are in Illinois because Fuentes lives in Chicago. I don’t know what the Illinois specific laws are.

 

So I can’t really comment on whether there’s a legal case or not. You know, also the fact that he is a political dissident of prominence and Illinois is a Blue state that probably has very like Left-wing judges that he could get in trouble on the basis of that, like their bias against him. Right? But she said she’s going to press charges.

 

But also in my opinion, her statements show a clear intent to harass him. She’s been hysterically posting all this on social media and was posting before she even like I think rang the doorbell. So.

 

[41:41]

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

[1:55:50]

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 11/15/2024 = 364)

HyperChat min: 100
Thorne91
4 hours ago
Could a healthy, fascist Australia handle a Chinese invasion? How many malnourished chinks can a Joel, Tom or Blair take at one time is the question.

2
0
Hide replies
WhiteLightWhiteHeat
2 hours ago
Many

ChainReaction
8 hours ago
o/

2
0
C.A.S.S.
8 hours ago
More

1
0
Thorne91
4 hours ago
Regarding Nick and American law: some states are a “stand your ground” state. Texas, Florida, typically red states. In other states run by liberals, you have a “duty to retreat” before you engage a threat. This would apply to being mugged or beat up or any of that. Maybe it’s different since she’s at his house, but I’m pretty sure a judge in Illinois can fuck him up if they want. He needs to move to a deep red state. In Texas you could probably shoot a woman who refuses to leave your property. Especially if she’s hostile and you’ve given verbal warning. So…self defense is definitely state by state.

1
0

@Horatius
8 hours ago
thanks. always get great insight from these streams. top notch articulation

1
0
MagicManintheSky
8 hours ago
o/

1
0

@Horatius
8 hours ago
o/

1
0
C.A.S.S.
8 hours ago
Less

1
0

@Horatius
8 hours ago
everyone can contribute in some way. just going into libertarian and conservative online chats and trying to win them over to our side is something that can be done. I’ve had success and others have to. they have a hard time arguing against us nowadays

1
0

@NotBabyHitler88
8 hours ago
Trumps at war with the establishment…he loves jews

1
0
Thorne91
4 hours ago
Whites are israel, that’s why Jews want to destroy us all. And I can prove it here in comments. This non-white immigration has nothing to do with banks or economics or any of that shit, those are just excuses and methodologies.
In 745 BC Menasseh (a tribe of Israel, a WHITE ethnostate) was conquered by he Assyrians. YHWH punished them and kept Menasseh in bondage 7X for their sin (check Leviticus
26:18
)
The original punishment was 360 years. So multiply that by 7. You get 2520. So add 2520 years to 745 BC. You get – 1776. The tribe of Menasseh is the founding stock of America. Same thing with Britain. The tribe of Ephraim (another white ethnostate) was conquered by Assyrians in 721 BC. 7X 360, add to 721BC, you get 1801. This prophecy in Leviticus
26:18
accurately predicts he founding of America and Britain and ascribes these lands to the tribes of Menasseh and Ephraim. So basically…Jews are lying about being “chosen.” They are Edom. Genetic mutant baby-eating, blood-drinking, ritual-sacrificing monsters who completely take over everything any chance they get and they are LYING about who hey are. Edomites. And their #1 goal is to wipe out YHWH’s people who are European whites and our posterity. So…whether you believe in God, or the Bible, or not – Leviticus
26:18
should at least make you think twice about WHY it is so important to protect our people, who we really are, and who the Jews are.
I’ll continue below.
Less

0
3
Hide replies
Thorne91
4 hours ago
The OT is not Jewish, it’s white. Jesus was white. The Talmud is the true Jewish book and it’s the only one they care about. They just pretend to follow Torah but it’s a show. If Jews actually followed he Bible, they’d stop the usury and porn and all that disgusting degenerate shit. They dgaf about the Bible. They only follow Talmud.
So…hopefully these prophecies and this knowledge is helpful to someone. If you dig, all of the evidence points toward Israelites being white and Jews being Edom. And it only further solidifies the position of the national socialists. Christianity DOES have racial teeth, if you get past the Jewish schofield fake israel Zionist bullshit. And Leviticus
26:18
is just one of many points of evidence to back up what I’m saying here.

0
2
Thorne91
4 hours ago
o/

Thorne91
4 hours ago
*1775 my bad. I

Thorne91
3 hours ago
Wait no, it’s not 1775 it actually is 1776 because you count count the “zero” between BC and AD. It just goes directly from 1BC to 1AD. So yeah…Menasseh is accurately and specifically prophecies to come into their new land in exactly 1776. If this isn’t evidence Hebrews we’re white, idk what is. I loved this stream so much and I see so many NatSocs and Christians fighting…thank you Joel for not doing that. Neutered white Christians need to realize they’re Hebrews. That way, white Christians can maintain their faith in Christ, and ALSO have the exact same secular goals and beliefs as the national socialists. This knowledge gives teeth back to Christianity and then there’s no more reason for atheist NatSocs to reject believers in Christ. This is the answer. White Hebrews and proven in Leviticus
26:18
and all across the Bible.

Indo-European
1 hour ago
The age restriction legislation is a disaster. it will eventually mean the end of casual, anonymous browsing of all video and file servers. It would be better to ban children from using smart phones. As if they would ever do that

@BMC1488
1 hour ago
DONALD TRUMP WHITE POWER!

@BowHunter88
2 hours ago
You talk politics, yet you raise criminal act after criminal act this government commits on a daily basis. Organized lawfare to vompel governments to act lawful is a strategy it seems has never been attempted.

@Clyde
6 hours ago

tranny teacher in Canada

Dawn Browning
8 hours ago

@Horatius
Yup. They did a good job on Westernkind. Me included. Onwards…..

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
Less

Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
JoelBlairLove Love to all you Beautifuls MWAH

@Horatius
8 hours ago
they don’t even know they are a people, or don’t want to believe they are. they see others as groups but don’t see whites as one. I come across this constantly when interacting with average Whites. they were convinced by propaganda that they are just random individuals or scared of their white identity because Jews say that’s racist

@Bamzal
8 hours ago
o/

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
8 hours ago
two bloody wankers

DOLO
8 hours ago
o/

Archipelago Woes
8 hours ago
o\

DOLO
8 hours ago
Where is Margo?

@Horatius
8 hours ago
yup. spot on Blair

Hess’ Channel
8 hours ago
remade version of The Day of the Jackal with Nigs

@WeWuzKrangz
8 hours ago
based Blair

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
Your body, my choice is brilliant. Those who don’t think it through will jump to the conclusion that you are dictating what they can or cannot do reproductively, but in reality it is your choice as a man whether or not you would impregnate her in the first place.

@david_smith
8 hours ago
QLD LNP has a minister specifically excluding White Men, you should lobby/petition for a minister for White Men.

@Horatius
8 hours ago
if White men are United, there is nothing that cannot be accomplished. have to come together for our own interests and give up on individualism nonsense

DOLO
8 hours ago

@MagicManintheSky
You got another holocaust movie for me? Yes sir i do!

MagicManintheSky
8 hours ago

@DOLO
I hear you

DOLO
8 hours ago

@MagicManintheSky
I can’t wait to not watch another holocaust movie.

MagicManintheSky
8 hours ago
I see there’s a new Holohoax movie out to push the Israel wagon….

Matt Hammond
8 hours ago
That was whitepilling

Hess’ Channel
8 hours ago

@katana17
try this –
https://archive.org/details/history-of-the-white-australia-policy-to-1920

@david_smith
8 hours ago
Very much legally

@david_smith
8 hours ago
There are certainly things that can certainly be changed, with legal politics.

Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
JOEL! It’s bedtime

@Horatius
8 hours ago
but at the same time, the Jews and their lackeys sure seem to want to destroy the West and don’t care about the consequences. They want revenge at all costs it seems.

Dawn Browning
8 hours ago
We duck out, they gone. They have to be fully exposed & 111’d before we’re taken seriously.

@Horatius
8 hours ago
if not enough whites live in an area to prop it up, it will collapse into total shit. the government realized this years ago when it did happen, they had no white taxes to give to blacks and browns

@david_smith
8 hours ago
Orangutans

@david_smith
8 hours ago
Ok Joel is basically inline with my thoughts

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 hours ago
I hope Jews fumble live granades

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
*An

@david_smith
8 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
I think they fucked themselves

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
And alternative to the Sampson option

@david_smith

ChainReaction
8 hours ago
More

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago

@david_smith
I think the Jews will force WWIII once the antisemitism in the west is at a tipping point.

MagicManintheSky
8 hours ago
No more brothers wars for the Jew.

Dawn Browning
8 hours ago

@katana17
Are you still transcribing?

Hide replies

@katana17
1 second ago(edited)
Of course!
https://katana17.com/

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 hours ago
gud thing we’ll have plenty of kids with hundreds of hours of tower defence under their belts to help with the dark future

@david_smith
8 hours ago
I doubt it, Joel normally steals my takes that I never told anyone, but I don’t think Trump can mobilize WW3

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago

@david_smith
lol

ChainReaction
8 hours ago
“Conservatives risk nothing at all and gain everything.” ~ Raging Dissident

Hess’ Channel
8 hours ago
Trump will not stop Ukraine SMO

@Horatius
8 hours ago
republicans always talk a big game but when the moment of truth happens, they cuck and back down. we’ll see. I’ll believe them when I see it

Dawn Browning
8 hours ago

@katana17

@david_smith
8 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
My brown streamer is better than your brown streamer

Hess’ Channel
8 hours ago

@katana17
thats a Cebu upload – that’s China text scanning

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
Less

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
8 hours ago
Less

@katana17
8 hours ago
https://archive.org/details/historyofwhiteau0000will/page/n5/mode/2up

@Sweet_Nerevar
8 hours ago
he literally one set above Voldemort

MagicManintheSky
8 hours ago
Jews own the Media. Jews control our minds.

The Crucible 01
8 hours ago

@david_smith
hasnt been decided yet, its either one of the mad max movies or trailer park boys.

@david_smith
8 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
Chopper?

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
come to

@JoeBorackOBiden
channel after joel is finished, we are watching a movie, (dw its chill there)

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@david_smith
Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. He’ll be right.

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
see subversive jew ^

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
when u decide who in power n u have blackmail on them, u effectively in power

DOLO
9 hours ago
If WN’s get control of just one country, it could have a domino effect throughout the world.

@Horatius
9 hours ago
I’ve heard people say that Jews don’t have true power, that they have heavy influence on those in power. there is a distinction. don’t know if true

MagicManintheSky
9 hours ago
Jews act like a hive mind

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
yes Joel Juice power is a certain extent an illusion

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
Some of us are up in 6 hours at 4am, you know.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
Yes, something forced can only last so long, everything returns to nature.

@david_smith
9 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
Poor guy tapped out to avoid being called racist for his honesty. Then got in shit anyway.

DOLO
9 hours ago
I think it’s the guy who threw the gangs in prison

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
It’ll return to the natural state…. eventually

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
tom got arrested again..(seriously hope not)

DOLO
9 hours ago
You could be right. One of the south american countries uses that leverage to still work with america, under threat of an alliance with russia/china

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@david_smith
I do miss Woodley

@Horatius
9 hours ago

@david
wow. did not know that or remember him saying that at the time.

@Crazy_Cat_Gentleman
9 hours ago
The food problem is easily solved. Make it possible for a man to be a provider and a woman to be a homemaker again. Men want to be the provider and women want to be the homemaker, but they took that from us.

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
wanker ^

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
it’s the numbers, i suppose

@Horatius

DOLO
9 hours ago
If you built up the navy and allied with Russia/China, you’d probably be okay.

@david_smith
9 hours ago

@Horatius
He supported the mRNA injection, that is proof he is not an intelligent honest person who understands science.

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@Horatius
to a degree

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Indonesia

@Horatius
9 hours ago
wouldn’t Australia be easy to defend?

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
please be aware of ChainReaction he is a liar defending grifters.

MagicManintheSky
9 hours ago
Jewmurica

DOLO
9 hours ago
Probably Britain lol

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago

@MarkCollett
yes, it lends its elf to a Sharia mentality

@david_smith
9 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
I liked it when he had Woodley to control his nonsense.

ChainReaction
9 hours ago

@MarkCollett
<– THAT

@Horatius
9 hours ago

@david
why do you say that? just curious. doesn’t he just read studies that he trusts are real and true?

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
yes…ban heavy

@Sweet_Nerevar
9 hours ago
they’re conditioned to be soft now, but if U leave a little one with only transformers to watch he will be violent lol and U will have to roll play as Megatron at least once a week lol

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@david_smith

@Horatius
I like Ed.

Mark Collett
9 hours ago
The problem with the “Your body, my choice” slogan, is I am sure plenty of Muslims groomers had that attitude toward white girls.

@Horatius
9 hours ago
pure individuals would die if they were kicked out of the group centuries ago. the dna knows this it seems.

@david_smith
9 hours ago

@Horatius
He cannot understand how to do science.

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
ppl who work in Coles supermarkets

Mark Collett
9 hours ago
Most people are actually not leftists

@Horatius
9 hours ago
Dutton thinks leftists are spiteful mutants who wouldn’t exist if not for technology that saves them from dying in the womb or as children

Mark Collett
9 hours ago
Most people are conformists

@david_smith
9 hours ago

@JoeBorackOBiden
Y?

MagicManintheSky
9 hours ago
Segregate schools again.

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Blair must be hungry

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
Sex is further ingrained into DNA than anything else

@Sweet_Nerevar
9 hours ago
yeah thousands of yrs of successful hunts

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@MarkCollett
Ey up luv. Busy 24 hrs for you. Woodlander chat was Tip Top

@Horatius
9 hours ago
cool. Mark is one of the best out there. has been for years

@Sweet_Nerevar
9 hours ago
fat ho power grid

@Sweet_Nerevar
9 hours ago
hamster wheels…green energy,they’ll probably buy it

@david_smith
9 hours ago
That is IRL Mark, he watches the show

@Horatius
9 hours ago
Hey Mark o/ if that’s really you lol

@david_smith
9 hours ago
?

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Big brain strong, mild autist

DOLO
9 hours ago
jock

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
You can be scrawny & brawny

@david_smith
9 hours ago
That is like the black super hacker

@Horatius
9 hours ago
part of the obesity issue is caused by a high percentage of people quitting smoking. just started stuffing their face instead

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
participation prizes

DOLO
9 hours ago
Jamie Oliver had a tv show and he made healthy school lunches, and all the women were bringing in crisps and chocolate and passing it through the fence. They had to end it because the parents complained so much..

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@MarkCollett
top of the morning to ya

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Hey Mark

@david_smith
9 hours ago
The food is poison.

@Horatius
9 hours ago
50’s physical education in America was pretty based

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@JoeBorackOBiden
good, give those faggots no rest!

Mark Collett
9 hours ago
Hi guys!

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Obesity is almost entirely because of diet.

Homeschooledjedi
9 hours ago
0/chat

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
Nah he fucked off

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
activity at schools

@david_smith
9 hours ago
There was a teacher at highschool who did that with young teenagers…

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
he has prolly blocked you to

@JoeBorackOBiden
and is now talking crap about ya in his bed with the boys lmao

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Mandatory carnivore

@david_smith
9 hours ago
You have to reform who controls what the military is for.

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@JoeBorackOBiden
lmao nice

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
For

@ChainReaction
Less

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@joeldavis
sorry for shitting up the chat with this crap, but chain reaction needs to be called out and nnr, flood, logos, drilla etc need to be exposed for the pieces of shit that they are. they are lying grifters, doxing banning white natsocs to line their own pockets

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
Sorry to shit up your chat

@joeldavis

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
Less

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
weak

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
omg muting cass now.

scoobyburn
9 hours ago
this is an AU stream,,,,

MagicManintheSky
9 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
LOL

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
Couldn’t handle Crucible? had to mute him?

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Kaz Ross

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@MagicManintheSky
Burke models himself on Albo so much that I get them mixed up.

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
check the Minister who wrote it – Rowling

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Lobby Qld government to have a minister for White Men. It would easily get enough signatures to make them respond to it.

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
it could lead to political idea censorships.

MagicManintheSky
9 hours ago
Burke is a super Shabbos Goy in bed with Mark Dreyfuss.

@Ral9010NatSoc
9 hours ago
You toxic faggots are infecting every chat on Odysee. Get a fucking life you bitch niggers.

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
it gives ACMA take down notices which doc media must adhere to

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
MAD Bill will be selective

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@DOLO
now ask, has any of the faggots like Chain Reaction defending these scum provided any facts proving their innocence?

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@Hess
Cheers

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Also many in cities and suburbia

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
This

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago

@DawnBrowning
yes – Erikson’s YT chan

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Plenty of rural Aussies have missed all the anti-White shit

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@DOLO
flood doxing rango dingboth
Less

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@Hess
Is it still online?

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
Less

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@DOLO
drilla reporting the people calling his grift out h
Less

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@MagicManintheSky
yup

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Neil did a good interview with Roberts years ago

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
“loons with ill intentions” your projection is obvious

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
^

MagicManintheSky
9 hours ago
The Jews are anti-Nationalist in our countries but pro-Nationalist in Israel. Funny that.

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
piece of shit

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
Less

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@david_smith
not gossip, they are lying grifters and need to be called out

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Burke is juice heritage

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@DOLO
Graf, owner of poa.st who confirmed nnr would complain to him about other people, changed nnr’s handle because he was sick of the faggotry h
Less

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
Can’t handle criticism?

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Stop shitting up the chat with higschool girl gossip

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago

@david_smith
That was awesome, Dan vs Piers

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
ABC upset about SSM

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
yeah, just block disruptive loons with ill intentions

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
Less

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@DOLO
nnr publicly complaining to odysee on twitter h
Less

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
I’m muting those who are discussing that which is not relevant. Love Love

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Burke would n’t say that to Faruqi

DOLO
9 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
Write an article and prove all of your claims then. I’m not going to watch 3 hour streams to get an idea of what’s happening. If someone did that, i’d take a look.

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
he used to be the whip in Parliament

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Watch Dan Bilzarian Vs. Pierce Morgan. More so share it with people who are naive.

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@DOLO
nnr has doxed, banned complained to higher authorities etc and started the timeslot wars

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
you are right Blair…and social media, wiki and dumb internet sites caused that

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
CDC is all juice

DOLO
9 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
again, you can use the word grifter, but what do you even mean?

@Bamzal
9 hours ago
they’re poppin outta tunnels

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Absolutely genetic to a large degree, also the talmud.

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Blair – research the Talmud

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
lol

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
fucken dbots

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@DOLO
i dont give a fuck about tuber, im calling out the grifters and their defenders, do i need to share the screenshots again?

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
hahaha Dbots it is from now on

DOLO
9 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
You keeps using words like subversive, but do you really know what they mean? Why are you still defending someone that’s outed as brown?

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
Blair? BLAIR?????

@david_smith
9 hours ago
Karl Marx

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
lets call them Dbots

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Larry Fink

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
But it is the jews

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
yes, we have the proof including the word of social media owner poa.st, your a lying subversive faggot

scoobyburn
9 hours ago
biggest revenue from the web is porn & gambling

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
It’s so dumb. My lads hacked my passwords dozens of times. These u-16yos will be voting next

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
i keep hearing things like that

@Hess
but has it rly been confirmed?

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
lol

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
umm I.D that is digital duhh

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Tails was 0dayed years ago by Exodus

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
wont have it for long if your already there.

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
widely available porn is no good for kids

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
TAILS OS <– last place we’ll have, get it while u can

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
ACMA

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
You will use your MyGov

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
neither are you now fuck off jew!

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
nah, social media no good for kids n youths

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Dischord is not good

@PureNomad
9 hours ago
Tom is still my best friend

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
data base got hacked long ago

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
haha

scoobyburn
9 hours ago
government data bases get hacked

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
they can play snake

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
yeah nokia 3310s

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
Then should just make smart phones illegal for people under 16, just give them old style flippers

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@JoeBorackOBiden
and gave us all a hecking laugh

M88
9 hours ago
see could have been packing heat, how is he to know.

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
HE had every right to do that

Dawn Browning
9 hours ago
She has the helium physiognomy voice

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Fuentes lives in a nice area…cops would back him up

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Blair – get it together

@TASMANIANDEVIL
9 hours ago
Depends on the state

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
glass ceiling? it’s brick, bitch

@Bamzal
9 hours ago
its technically in direct reference to abortion rights and thats it, but you can run wild with the implications

C.A.S.S.
9 hours ago
It was a troll and hilarious

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
he got doxed first

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Marla Rose

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
^

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago
BASED SHIRT

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
don’t let it happen again Blair..

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Trump will monitor the situation, only 2 weeks until free speech

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
twitter already 13+ age

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
odd how only Corperate submissions are published

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
unblock me on poa.st, you want to talk shit dont do it so i cant respond

@david_smith
10 hours ago
BLAIR YOU ARE MUTED

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
Van is secretary of Ukraine Club…got busted wearing Galacia patch

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
Lidia Thorpe got him…Van

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago

@JoeBorackOBiden
I like the cleaner cut

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
your a low life maggot claiming innocence and your far from it.

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
lol

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago
I like the shirt

@joeldavis

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
fucking cunt*

@TASMANIANDEVIL
9 hours ago
Castle doctrine?

@Bamzal
9 hours ago
i heard she pressed charges not sure tho

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago
nicky had a sperg out haha

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
your a literal pos

@Bamzal
9 hours ago
trump managed to do one thing right, which is blocking both first female presidents

scoobyburn
9 hours ago
na, who put that bell button in,, shocking

ChainReaction
9 hours ago
Murdoch Murdoch had the funniest take on Fuentes

The Crucible 01
9 hours ago

@ChainReaction
fuck off faggot

Hess’ Channel
9 hours ago
Marla Rose

@RedemptionDenied
9 hours ago
shame fuentes is a mexican twink

@david_smith
10 hours ago
I think I’m going to live where there is only 3G service and not buy Skynet from Elon

PaperBeatsRock
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
yeah, you really are an utter shit cunt

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
keep projecting you fucking you are finished.

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
Ban the Commie Fist? Ban the Middle Finger? Ban the o7 Salute?

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
you are a subversive lying piece of shit midwit larping as a “smart person” you support flood, nnr, drilla, logos, that all the proof anyone needs

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago

@Bamzal
Graf is Based, NNR is a faggot

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
that financial stuff is for scam baiting etc

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago
Speech doesn’t physically harm anyone, this is jew faggy commie shit saying speech harms

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
prove any of these claims u unhinged, stalking loser hahaha, keep seething, fags… whoa
More

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
GRAF OWNER OF POA.ST CHANGING NNR’S HANDLE BECAUSE HE WAS SICK OF THE COMPLAINTS NNR’S WOULD SEND TO POA.ST ABOUT OTHER PEOPLE
Less

@david_smith
10 hours ago
I doubt Joel gives a fuck about which brown people you prefer between HT and tuber

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
Less

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
I’m all good…I just come for the fellowship with like minded white people ….I’m not one to follow or idolize …I don’t toss my shekles at them either so no skin off my ass if some streamers are disingenuous grifters…keep things in proper perspective

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
cant prove it hey faggot, hold up i got more!!!

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
NNR COMPLAING TO ODYSEE ON TWITTER G
Less

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
FLOOD DOXING RANGO DINGBOT G
Less

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago

@david_smith
yea guilty

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
most of the media contacting you are just testing you

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
ohhh really faggot

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago
Drew PAvlou is an absolute faggot and he is not an Aussie

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@JoeBorackOBiden
You are doing timeslot war on Joel you cunt

Johnny Bags
10 hours ago
They wanna be able to write that you didnt respond to their request for comment, in their hit piece article

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
losers search streams in incognito mode just to seethe n talk shit they can’t prove… sad losers… seriously, sad

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@HitlersGhost
yes spy hunter and drilla have been doxing randbot, regardless what you think of rand, its wrong.

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago
proximity certainly does breed contempt

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
lol ^

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
You lick NNRs nuts like a fag, funny you say other people have a hard on for you

@fleabittenrat
10 hours ago
any jeet you find, i’ll find a white that can do better

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
Pressure valves. Don’t waste your $ being political ffs

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
Spy Hunter is on his dick too now I see

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@HitlersGhost
Move to a rural area

C.A.S.S.
10 hours ago
SAME SHIT IN AMERICA

@joeldavis

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
hilarious what that mentally ill faggot has a hard on for me, what a homo… actually searches to find me even though he blocked smh

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago
my city is now about 18% white …fucking depressing total beaner take over

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Roberts is a bit like David Icke, he really doesn’t get it, but is right occasionally.

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
chain reaction supports nnr’s subversive grifting

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@HitlersGhost
100% so is chain reaction

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
Roberts is pretty good in Estimates

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago

@TheCrucible01
NNR is a faggit

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Qld has state controlled by LNP, we should lobby for a minister for White Men, as they have a minister for specifically excluding White men.

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
g
More

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
g
More

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
supports the doxxing, banning and de-plattforming of white natsocs, he wants jews (Dbot) in the natsoc cause

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago
I fucking hate Whites who support immigration…our quality of life is degraded and big business benefits …crooked politicians too I would imagine as a diverse fractured population is easier to deceive and control

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
subversive

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago
Watch out for

@ChainReaction
he is a lying subverisive piece of shit

The Crucible 01
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
this you faggot – g
Less

@fleabittenrat
10 hours ago
take away the gibs and they’ll leave

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
all the Jeets cheat on exams

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@HitlersGhost
It is Aussie version of naturalization act

scoobyburn
10 hours ago
70% of new home builds are rented by international students

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago
yeah, get them out

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Also our universities are garbage, I would hate to think what they are like in worse places.

Hitlers Ghost
10 hours ago

@david_smith
Wet ass Pussy??

Dawn Browning
10 hours ago
Didn’t you listen to Woodlander?

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Retrospective WAP would be cool

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Pauline Hanson also went in ahijab thing to show solidiarity with muslims.

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
Less

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
Limbrick is Juice

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
abortion is not complicated…its become an industry which is used as Political policy…quiet easy to not get pregnant in 2024

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
Yeah mainly a wedge issue, where the centrist is correct.

ChainReaction
10 hours ago

@david_smith
tis a complicated topic, our prob tends to be that now it pushed like a right of passage by loons

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
I guess my opinion is that abortion should be available, it is just that people should be in a healthy state and not have any use for in in normal situations.

@fleabittenrat
10 hours ago
teacher owned by student

ChainReaction
10 hours ago

@david_smith
smh…

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
the + is animals…wtf

@david_smith
10 hours ago

@ChainReaction
Iknew someone who starved themselves to kill their baby to avoid getting an abortion. Even abos knew how to do abortions using drugs.

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
nuke it

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
if those whore had that kind of discipline, abortion wouldn’t be an issue…

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
forced sterilisation was court ordered in 28 states of US – way before Nazi heard of it

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Eugenic abortion is fine IMO, just not forced

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Capsicum spray is illegal as a self defense in Australia, but you can use habernero oil on your food.

@fleabittenrat
10 hours ago
it’s great for niglets

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
yeah, Zyklon it up brah

Bianca Fights The Zombies
10 hours ago
o/o/

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
Zyklon pepper spray

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
acid is better

ChainReaction
10 hours ago
lol, was looking for that t-shirt

DOLO
10 hours ago
excellent edit lol

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Oh naur muh peaceful invaders

@RockyTas
10 hours ago
WP

@david_smith
10 hours ago
Weaker than I think? How often do they win strongman competitions?

@NATIONAL-SAXONIST
10 hours ago
o/

DOLO
10 hours ago
Have you got a great title for me? Yes sir i do!

Hess’ Channel
10 hours ago
Achtung

@BlotOutTheMemoryOfJacob
11 hours ago
o/

ChainReaction
11 hours ago
great title o/

@katana17
12 hours ago

Joel Davis – One Nation – Ineptitude or Controlled Opposition? – Nov 4, 2024 – Transcript

0
0

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: It is The Joel and Blair Show. I’m at a bit of a different background this time because I’m in between places at the moment, and so it’s a bit of an ad hoc setup, but it looks okay, I guess. Gotta hold the mic with my hand, though. I couldn’t find a good resting point for it, so hopefully that works out okay.

 

But anyway. How you doing Blair? You got a haircut?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Hang on. You’re going to hold your microphone the entire time like a news journalist?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, I guess it’s good. It’s a little bit of a bicep activation or something, maybe. Solbra [sp] would probably say:

 

“Oh, it’s a good. You need to do, like, weird exercises or something to have a more complete workout.”

 

So this is just another workout. Maybe I should put a dumbbell on the microphone next week and just hold, like a 15 kilo dumbbell attached to it or something. And then eventually I’ll just be, like, so jacked.

 

Blair Cottrell: Impressed as always. I own by your dedication and resourcefulness. Like, if the stream is scheduled, Joel’s doing it no matter where he is and how limited he is. Doesn’t matter. He’ll just hold his microphone if he has to! It’s great!

 

Yeah, I’m doing fine, man. I’m really busy lately. I haven’t really uploaded much content or being that active online because we have our national weightlifting event coming up hosted by Tom and the guys. Same one I injured myself at last year, and so I’m really determined to come back this year and push some big numbers to kind of demonstrate that [I’m] freakishly strong at the moment, and I’ll demonstrate that at this year’s weightlifting event. I’m excited to get up there. I’ve got to travel a bit of distance to get there, so I’m doing some extra work to make sure I can do that comfortably. I think you’ll be going to. Is that right? Joel’s going to be pushing some big numbers as well. I think you’re up there with probably. I reckon you’ll be up there in the top five.

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know if I’ll make the top five. I’ve been pretty happy with that. But my squat shit, because of my knee injury, that will cost me a little bit.

 

But, yeah, I think my bench and my deadlift are coming along strong every week. The number keeps going up,. So this is the first year I’ve really trained for this. So I’m pretty. I’m kind of kicking myself, to be honest, that I didn’t get into this earlier because then I could maybe be challenging a bit higher up the rankings.

 

But I guess it’ll do my best, set a number and then next year come back and try and smash it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Better late than never, bro. Like you’re into it now and you can only improve from here.

 

It’s been an interesting week. Obviously not as intense or exciting as a presidential candidate being, you know, an attempted assassination on a presidential candidate. And I’ve just done a big leg workout quite intense. I’ve actually been doing less volume, more weights, and I’m really packing on tissue as a result. And it’s got me feeling a bit spaced out.

 

So if I do slur my words or something, know that I’m not retarded, my blood is just drained out of my brain and is currently sitting in my quads. And I’m not as articulate as I usually am when I’m in that state.

 

But the couple of things that I think we should cover this week. Everyone’s really angry about that Australian woman being raped in Paris by Africans, and rightfully. So there’s that, and there’s a couple of other topics I wanted to bring up as well, but are you happy to start with that?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. By the way, apparently I had the wrong mic selected. Didn’t tell me that I sounded like shit, so I couldn’t tell.

 

Blair Cottrell: You sound fine to me. Like you’ve got a voice that comes through nice and clear regardless of the mike.

 

Joel Davis: I actually checked the chat for once. Often I ignore it. It was an O7 to the chat.

 

Blair Cottrell: I better do that too, actually. I better keep an eye on the chat because I haven’t been doing that either.

 

But, yeah, this, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the French, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Because I’ve been, … Sorry.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I got The Noticer article here, but I pulled that up, because you said you don’t know too much about the story.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve seen it in newspaper. Like I said, I’ve been really busy with work. Haven’t had a lot of time to really read all the details, but I know it happened and I’ve seen newspaper reports, but I haven’t read The Noticer report. So yeah, let’s have a look at general perspective here.

 

Joel Davis: So here we go:

 

“Australian tourists, 25, gang raped by five Africans in Paris. One attacker followed her into a kebab shop where she took refuge.”

 

Well, the fact that she had to take refuge in a kebab shop probably says something about what part of town she was in. That’s the thing about going to these European cities. You know, the locals there probably know the areas that you’re not supposed to go to the areas that are full of Africans and Arabs and so on.

 

But, you know, this woman obviously was naive. Doesn’t really know Paris. Maybe had an idealistic notion of Paris, a romanticized notion of Paris. Thinks she can just walk around like she can on the streets of the inner city of Melbourne or Sydney. Which isn’t necessarily the safest place in the world, but it’s a lot safer than Paris, and obviously wandered into the wrong neighbourhood.

 

Anyway:

 

“Australian tourist was gang raped by five African men in Paris before fleeing to a kebab shop where one of her attackers followed her inside. The woman, 25, was attacked 03:00 am. Saturday morning near Boulevard de Clichy in the French capital’s 18th arrondissement, (whatever that is) close to the famous Moulin Rouge cabaret just days before the Olympic Games is due to begin. She sought refuge in a nearby kebab shop with her dress on backwards and partially torn, only for one of her rapists to confront her again, CCTV footage from the store obtained by 7 News shows.”

 

I guess the video has been removed by [word unclear]. That’s interesting, actually, that 7 News took the video down, probably because the video., … This was such a big story, everyone, …

 

 

[06:06]

 

Blair Cottrell: It may have been hot linked from YouTube, and YouTube took it down.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. It says here that the video has been removed by uploader.

 

So that’s interesting. Like, are they trying to memory hole this because they realised:

 

“Oh, this story’s a little bit too racially charged!”

 

“The footage shows the victim being helped by customers and staff before an African man in black pants and a white T-shirt walks in. According to seven News, she tried to tell locals he was one of the attackers, but they were unable to speak English. As he made an order and lingered in the shop, she was able to alert an English speaker, who confronted the African. He fled the shops just minutes before police arrived.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Did you watch the, … I sent you the footage of this [word unclear] Did you watch it?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I saw it. I didn’t see what you sent me, but I’ve seen it. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Uh, uh. It took a while for anyone to actually register that not only had she been sexually assaulted by a gang of Africans, but one of them was in the shop and had followed her there. Obviously, they weren’t done with her yet.

 

And I think someone in the footage actually took a swing at him, eventually attacked the guy, and the guy ran off just before the police arrived. But, man, it’s really frustrating to watch that footage! You’re in a kebab shop. There’s going to be utensils there. There’s going to be cutlery. You know, there’s opportunities you have there to defend yourself viciously because you’ve been assaulted viciously!

 

So it’s just really frustrating to see the lack of, I don’t know, protective community spirit that no one jumped to her aid. It took a woman to stand up first, and then a guy eventually stood up because he understood that there was a serious problem here. And someone who assaulted her actually followed her into the shop.

 

But he didn’t do enough. Like, he just had a jab. He took a jab at the guy and then let the guy run off. Why didn’t they restrain that guy? Why didn’t they restrain him until the police arrived? Why didn’t they do more? They just let a rapist run away. What the fuck is wrong with these people? What the fuck is going on in Paris! Why can’t an Australian citizen go to Paris without getting raped by gangs of Africans? Well, we know why that is! Because:

 

“Diversity is our greatest strength!”

 

And the government has to let all these people in from incompatible cultures who have no respect for French people or German people or Italians or Australians. Who see them only as targets for sexual assault and whatever else they want to do or feel like doing. I’m really frustrated by this! I’m frustrated by the response that I saw in the front page of Herald Sun News, which is a major Australian newspaper. They’re suggesting that Australian Olympians competing at the Olympics, which I believe is scheduled to be hosted in Paris. Is that right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re suggesting that Australian Olympians don’t wear the classic Australian green and gold colours. This is what the Australian Olympians who represent our country typically wear.

 

Joel Davis: It wasn’t the newspaper Blair, it was the actual Olympic Commission that has instructed them.

 

Blair Cottrell: Not to wear green and gold because they may be targeted just for being Australians. Because typically, like, even though we have a very pro-multicultural society down here in Australia, most of our athletes are still good stock White people, because they’re the people who are the most athletic, I suppose, and also have access to the best facilities, private schools in Australia. They’re still majority Whites. Our country is still majority White.

 

And so our athletes are majority White and usually the highest of our stock. Because if you’re going to be competing on an international level. You’ve got pretty good genetic stock, generally speaking. And they can’t even wear colours that represent their own national team because they might be targeted by Africans. This is where we’re fucking at! This is where, this is how fucking bad it is! And the Olympic Committee, what’s the Olympic Committee’s response? Not get these people out of the country. Not remigration, mass deportations now, which should be their message:

 

“Oh don’t wear your national colours when competing in our country because you might be raped by Africans! Sorry. That’s just how it is. Part and parcel of living in diverse modern society!”

 

Very frustrating to me, man! Very aggravating! And people have a right to be angry about this. I don’t know who this woman was. I’m slightly angry at the woman too. You’ve got to not be holidaying on your own as a woman.

 

Like, this is a tendency that, …

 

Joel Davis: And going out at night.

 

Blair Cottrell: And at night as well. The world’s not a playground! You know that wanderlust hashtag. And there’s all these movies about girls going and finding themselves in these different countries and going on adventures, discovering themselves! It’s all bullshit! Like, you’re just a victim! You’re just a target for people who want to exploit you. The world’s not a playground. It’s a dangerous place!

 

 

And if you have the perspective that:

 

“Oh, I should be able to go and travel where I want.”

 

Yeah, theoretically, you should be able to buy whatever you want and do whatever you want and live an imagined life of luxury and thrill. But that’s not the way the world actually is so stop treating it like it is. Stop treating the world like a fucking playground! I don’t know. These wanderlust, young, stupid girls! It’s the boomers that put it in their heads a lot of the time, has the message that a lot of boomer parents pumped into the soft heads of their daughters:

 

“Don’t get pregnant early. Don’t worry about traditional standards. Just get a job, get a mortgage. And before you do that, go party up in Eos, do the Greek cruise, sail Croatia, and travel Europe, and drink fancy, colourful cocktails on some beautiful beach somewhere! And do that until you’re 38. Then come back and think about having children!”

 

If your uterus can still you know, generate the power to do it.

 

And a lot of young girls took the advice of their boomer parents, and now that’s what they value. That’s their priority in life, is to go party up in Europe and travel around like it’s a playground. And then get raped by gangs of Africans. It’s so fucking ridiculous, man! The boomers really need to pull their heads. And if you’ve got children, you’ve got to inoculate them against this nonsense and actually raise them to understand that the world is a dangerous place and they need to be prepared for stuff like this to happen.

 

The woman shouldn’t have been there. She shouldn’t have been on her own. I’m not going to say, actually, I won’t go as far to say that she shouldn’t have been there. I mean, you can visit Paris, but she shouldn’t have been on her own out at night. I mean, it’s just, I don’t know. What have you got to say about it, man? I’m just going to end up going on a long, angry rant.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I agree with you. What I said this morning on, I did Mark Collett show this morning, and we discussed this a little bit. And my take was, well, obviously some responsibility has to go to this woman’s father because he obviously wasn’t a protective father who instilled within her a sense of value that she, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Exactly!

 

Joel Davis: Because that’s the thing. Like, there’s a sense of value that I guess can be instilled in a woman that’s feminist, which is kind of perverse, … It’s kind of like her autonomy is where her value is derived. Her freedom, her autonomy, her ability to take care of herself and so on. And that’s what gives you value.

 

But that’s a load of bullshit because as you said, she doesn’t actually have the capability to defend herself in situations like this.

 

So the other kind of value that you can instil in your daughters is the idea that you’re so valuable that you need to be protected, that you deserve protection, that you should seek protection.

 

And when you’re raised with good parents who instil that in you as a woman, then you end up behaving accordingly. I know women that have been raised by more conservative parents who wouldn’t put themselves in that situation because they would be genuinely afraid of that outcome and would just simply make different decisions.

 

So, yeah, it’s obviously a parenting failure, but that’s part of a larger cultural failure, like you said.

 

But also secondarily, it’s also because of the anti-racist ideology perpetuated in our society. People, White people, have mental blocks against assessing these kinds of risks. They have an innate kind of trusting nature. Like when you said:

 

“Oh, well you know why is this woman out at night?”

 

Well, if France was still only full of French people, she probably could go out at night on her own and not get raped. It still probably wouldn’t be advisable, but she probably wouldn’t be getting gang raped by a bunch of White French people, because that’s not how White people operate.

 

So there’s a kind of innate kind of high trust sensibility that White people have, and, then they’ve been kind of psyopped into extending that to out-groups, even though it’s totally illegitimate.

 

And obviously she must have, and all White people must have a certain amount of trepidation or fear response or whatever. They’ve done studies that show when they look at the kind of neurological scanning of, like brain scans, literally, and they’ll show people images of White people, black people, Asians, whatever. And when you get shown an image of someone who is of a different race, a complete different part of your brain lights up, which is associated with the kind of primal fear response, like your lizard brain lights up. And this has been reproduced by multiple studies. So, you know, there is a certain innate kind of:

 

“Oh, this isn’t a safe neighbourhood!”

 

But then you have this overriding self talk that has been instilled in White people that:

 

“Well, that would be racist to acknowledge that feeling.”

 

And so it gets repressed.

 

So then the internal psychological resources that have been given to this woman by, and all of us, by evolution aren’t activated, which are there to defend yourself against out-groups. And then shit like this happens.

 

Obviously it’s a multifaceted problem. It just demonstrates the it’s an example, or a manifestation of a lot of the main ideological problems in our society, like the individualism, the feminism, the anti-racism. I mean, why the hell are there even a whole bunch of niggers in Paris, anyway? There shouldn’t be! It makes no sense that they’re there.

 

So, yeah, it’s just a failure on so many levels.

 

I mean, they shouldn’t be having the Olympics in Paris. It’s basically a third world city. We see so many reports, there was massive race riots there last year.

 

There’s been so many terrorist attacks by Muslims. It’s one of the worst cities in the world for pickpocketing, and it’s just an absolute nightmare! Everyone that I know that has been to Paris only has negative stories. I’ve never heard any story from anyone except from a boomer that went there in like, the 1960s, who has a positive Paris holiday story. Every single person I’ve ever spoken to that’s been there has a negative story, and just rants about it. And it ends up just being a conversation about how it’s been ruined by mass immigration.

 

[16:46]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you remember that Japanese tourists who went to Paris and expected to see French people, but just saw mostly Africans and Arab people and was like:

 

“What the hell? Like, I came on a vacation to Paris because I wanted to see Paris. This is not what I expected.”

 

That was kind of a viral video about five or six years ago. So it’s obviously been this way for a while. But I just want revenge, man!

 

I mean, this is close to home. This is an Australian woman and I just want revenge. I’m just so dissatisfied with the result that the guy was allowed to just run away. And what’s akin to rape? Like, what’s, you know how do you deal justice in a situation like that? I don’t know, man. I’ve just got my imaginations running wild and I feel vengeful about it. I don’t know the woman, but she’s Australian. And so for that reason I just feel so torn up inside about it.

 

So, yeah, it’s very unfortunate you gotta tolerate shit like this in this fucking society, you know?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it shouldn’t be tolerated. Like, we should demand nigger scalps from the French as restitution.

 

But, yeah, it’s a pretty horrific story. It’s quite an obvious take in response. Blank Actual said:

 

“France needs a revolution.”

 

Well, that’s one thing that the French have always been pretty good at doing, is revolutions, so why not another one?:

 

“Diversity is up rated stench with a poo emoji.”

 

What were you saying?

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s a saying:

 

“That the whiff of grapeshot has prevented any revolutionary spirit in the French people ever since that particular incident.”

 

And grapeshot is when Napoleon fired broken up cannonballs, which have a shotgun type effect. Like, imagine a row of giant shotguns is blowing people apart because after the first, the new revolutionary government took power, the people were very offended because the regular people thought they were going to come to power. That didn’t happen, of course.

 

And so there was a bit of a counter revolutionary effort. And Napoleon was given the task of quelling that counter revolution, and he did it with grapeshot. And I don’t think there was a significant case of any French rebellion against the government since then. But we’re starting to see it now, definitely. I’m sure there’s French nationalists that are active and I’m sure they’re busy.

 

So I don’t want to take anything away from the French. As I said I’m very angry about an Australian citizen being raped by Africans in Paris. Just, I won’t harp on about it, though. I think we’ve almost said enough about it. Unless you’ve got more thoughts.

 

Joel Davis: No, think it does bridge, though, to a larger theme. Which is, when would enough be enough? Like how many of these stories do we have to hear?

 

And even in South Africa there are still White Leftists.

 

So the view that I take on this subject is that basically there is no amount of tragic or brutal outcomes that will eventually fill up the meter of what White people can tolerate before they respond. I think the only way enough will be enough is if we actually build a counterforce, a movement that people can believe in, that can make them believe that there is an alternative.

 

I think basically now most people have just kind of accepted and become accustomed to this being the reality of Western society, that you’re just going to have this massive violent, particularly in Europe, immigrant population, that you’re going to have all the other problems associated with mass immigration. And it just is what it is. Most White people are not happy about it, but they have a kind of learnt helplessness.

 

And moreover, I think from an evolutionary biology perspective, I think the vast majority of people have kind of been selected with a lot of pro-social traits that make them trusting, that make them forgiving, accepting of others and so on. Which are good traits on an interpersonal level. Like the kind of traits that make you a good person to work with or be neighbours with or be friends with or in a family with, are not the same kind of traits that make you good at analyzing threats on a political level and coming bringing the right attitude towards politics.

 

And this is kind of, I think the problem with democracy, or one of the main problems with democracy is that the average person just doesn’t have the correct psychological constitution to be able to see politics clearly.

 

[21:32]

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re taught that everyone’s their friend, like people in, under democracy, it’s everyone’s your friend, treat everyone like a friend. But that’s not how other people are seeing you. Especially people who aren’t from your country. Not everyone is your friend. People are trying to exploit you, people are trying to take advantage of you, and you have to go through life with that perspective. Not all of the time. You be kind to people as much as you can be because I think that’s reciprocal. If you’re kind to people are kind to you, generally speaking.

 

But, yeah, I definitely don’t go through life thinking everyone’s my friend and believing in some universal human equality, because it’s bullshit! It’s just that’s not reality of the world we live in. It’s not the reality of human beings and all of the races that we sum up under the phrase “humanity”. I actually don’t even like the phrase “humanity” because, or for the exact reason I just outlined it. It just categorizes too many different, radically different types of people under one phrase. I think that’s why egalitarians coined the phrase humanity and love to use the phrase “human being” or “us”. Everything’s about “us”. But that’s not the way all these other races and nations in the world see us, see White people or Westerners. A lot of them think we’re idiots, actually.

 

I was given a book recently by a colleague. I forgot the name of it. I think it’s called something like How the Rest Fight the West. And it’s a modern interpretation by a former soldier, I think a high ranking soldier, as to how other nations currently view the West and their understanding of how to sort of gain advantage over the West in certain social, political situations. So that’ll be a good read. I’ll look it up now, actually, so I can get more information to you guys on that book.

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, I think it isn’t just what democracy teaches people. It’s a democracy empowers people that don’t really have any business making political decisions. Like, for the vast majority of human history, up until very recently, the average pleb, the peasant, wasn’t involved in political decision making in any meaningful capacity. There is, I think in order to have a sound political mentality, you have to be somewhat anti-social. You have to be able to look at the world through a dog-eat-dog lens, analyze the world dispassionately and rationally in terms of threats, in terms of the potential for violence, the potential for conflict, and ensuring self preservation.

 

And if you have this mentality in your daily life, you might be a bit of an asshole! You might not be the most considerate and caring and forgiving person. Being really considerate and caring and forgiving is great on an interpersonal level. That’s how you should be within a community, if you have a community of White people all taking care of each other, or a family, or a friendship group, those are the traits that actually hold the group together. But on a larger political scale, those traits, if they take over the society, end up basically weakening it and opening it up and exposing it to a lot of these threats, and democracy opens that up.

 

Whereas if you have a society where you have a kind of selection mechanism to bring people with a more anti-social, dog-eat-dog world mentality, select them up the hierarchy into positions of power and influence, that they can make political decisions that ensure the preservation of the race, of the nation and its interests. And the rest of the masses are able to basically be wholesome chungus. They’re able to be caring and altruistic and so on, because it won’t impact politics. They’ll just be like that in their everyday life and produce the optimal society.

 

And I think that’s basically what European society was when we had more of an aristocratic government. And as that has been whittled away, I think we’ve gone in the complete wrong direction. We’ve had more and more egalitarianism.

 

Obviously, there’s more to the story than that because we had mass democracy in Australia or in other countries prior to the Second World War, and we still had White nationalism. Obviously, Hitler was voted into power and so on.

 

So there is the capacity for democracies to function better than the current one that we have. This spectre of the Second World War and the way in which academia and media institutions have been captured by our racial enemies who have then propagated an anti-racist ideology throughout our society. And that obviously can’t be negated.

 

But I think the masses are susceptible to that message because it plays upon these emotional triggers. And those of us who aren’t susceptible to it, maybe there’s, on a certain level, something slightly wrong with us. Like a lot of people pathologise the far-Right and say:

 

“Oh, the far-Right. You know, they’re psychotic! They’re narcissistic!”

 

They kind of portray us as like pathological in some way because we have maybe a certain amount of anti-social aggression. But that enables us probably to see clearly a lot of these political issues.

 

So, yeah, I think the kind of brutality of my mindset probably turns a lot of people off. But the brutality of my mindset or your mindset or whatever is the what is necessary to actually protect the functional society.

 

[27:03]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I think it’s important to cancel some of that receptivity. Australian people, American people, European people have to subversive hostile influence, by making certain things illegal or not tolerated on a government and social level.

 

For example, you’re coming over here selling transgenderism and setting up clinics for sex changes. That’s illegal! You’re going to jail! You can either leave the country or go to jail. Same is true with pornography or something like that. You’re coming over here with some new type of extreme porn that you’re trying to pedal to the Australian masses. Ban! Illegal! Go to jail!

 

There needs to be clear stops against efforts to subvert and undermine the social fabric of Australian culture, or what Australian culture once was. It has been subverted and undermined as a result of the people being taught to be receptive, or our entire country being receptive to outside influence that was hostile from the beginning.

 

And what sets us apart from ordinary people, as you say, isn’t that there’s something wrong with us. It’s just that we’re able to recognise social and psychological threats. Not every message, not every book, not every show is just completely passive and exists for the purposes of entertainment. They exist to influence, often in a hostile fashion, for very special, specific (((interested groups))), which often aren’t even Australian, as we know. Right?

 

So the only real thing that sets me apart, I think, is I’m able to recognise threats and hostile influence. I’m not going to be receptive to messages about transgenderism, or feminism or anything that’s, like, in the realm of atheism and nihilism. I understand that these things are peddled deliberately to attack spiritually, socially, psychologically, us as a people, our nation!

 

And it’s been this way since the beginning. That’s why I think hostile forces to Australia have laughed at our Democratic principles, understanding that it makes us receptive to hostile influence. If you’re stupid enough to allow everything, then you won’t really have a nation or civilisation eventually. Something, some cancer, is going to grow. Think of your country or nation like an organism, right? Like a human body. The body has an immune system and it’s intolerant of certain bacterial infections and viruses. It doesn’t allow these things, it’s not receptive to these things, it fights these things.

 

And we as a nation, we have to do the same thing. We have to have boundaries and rules where certain influence, certain external bacteria that’s going to do damage to our national organism is not allowed to come in the first place. And if it does, it’s fought and attacked until it’s destroyed! It’s simple stuff, man, really!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course. I talked to you about this a little bit the other day when we had lunch. I think Jonathan Haidt’s moral foundations theory is quite interesting and pertinent to this discussion. So for some background, Jonathan Haidt is, I think he’s like a part jewish social psychologist, researcher. And his research is interesting because he is a liberal and he kind of set out to analyze, … So he’s a moral intuitionist. In other words, he believes that people don’t really reason their way to their moral judgements, but they have a set of moral intuitions that they reason from.

 

And so people have a certain kind of psychological instinctive predisposition to come to certain moral judgements, and then they just find the reasons that fit with those fundamental intuitions. And I agree that’s true. I think that’s how people operate. Which explains why ethical arguments are never done, are always just kind of people clashing over having different fundamental intuitions. They’re never really like technical arguments that people can reason towards some kind of agreement upon.

 

But anyway, what he ended up finding was that conservatives are actually morally balanced. And liberals, or Leftists, obviously they call Leftist liberals in America, are morally unbalanced, which is probably for him a counterintuitive judgement. That’s what makes the research interesting.

 

And basically he identified five core moral foundations. Three of them you could say are collectivist, and two of them you could say are individualist, although they might appear collectivist. But I disagree.

 

So the two that are individualist and these are the only two that Leftists generally care about are harm avoidance and equality. And I say these are individualist because equality and harm avoidance, they might seem like they are altruistic. Like:

 

“Oh, you want everyone to be equal, you want everyone to be included. You don’t want anyone to get hurt.”

 

But if you’re weak, or if you’re not capable of ascending the hierarchy to a prominent position within a hierarchical social model, which is the majority of people, then equality and harm avoidance, as universal principles, are in your personal self interest. And you can actually present your personal self interest like it’s altruistic through signaling towards those values. If you’re afraid of engaging in violence or competing in hierarchies, it’s the perfect ideology for you. And that’s why it’s so ubiquitous.

 

And that’s why we see Leftists or Leftism has a very large correlation with physical weakness, with a whole series of like low testosterone and a whole other series of negative traits. Conservatives on average are better looking, particularly the women. Right-wing women are much better looking than Left-wing women. That’s been like, scientifically proven through a series of studies, obviously, on average. And Leftism also correlates with a whole series of mental illnesses. Right-wingers, generally speaking, have way less clinical diagnoses of basically every kind of mental illness. So Left-wingers are kind of just mentally and physically less healthy.

 

But anyway, the point is that they have like a two stroke morality. They only care about those things. Where conservatives generally care about those things. But they’re balanced out with three other values, which he defined as sanctity, loyalty to the in-group, and respect for authority.

 

Sanctity basically being like respect for traditions and, just kind of the customs of the group and so on.

 

So you can see how sanctity, loyalty and authority, these things are all groupish traits that kind of hold together the cohesion of the group. And Leftist’s just forsake all of these things, which is why they have no regard for tradition, they have no regard for custom. They have no regard for in-group loyalty. They’re often, they’re basically traitors to the in-group.

 

[33:36]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re powered by a hatred which really invigorates them. Hatred can be a really powerful motivator, and it actually doesn’t matter. Like the dominance of the Left in the institutions demonstrates that with enough leverage, a specific philosophical group, or a group pertaining or holding to one idea, in this case, you know, Leftist liberalism, it doesn’t actually matter how respectful or fundamentally correct that group is. They just need to hate!

 

And then they need to have the brutal us versus them dynamic, the black and white perspective, and they need to hold to it like a Christian’s holding to his church faith, or a Muslim is holding to their mosque faith. They need to believe that much in whatever it is that they’re parroting. And they’ll eventually rise to prominence and have a lot of influence in those institutions.

 

So I think it’s being demonstrated through Leftism that it’s like brutality and hatred that actually gets you power in politics. It’s not being fair and respectful.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course. But for Leftists, it’s always brutality in defense of equality and harm avoidance, the kind of Drew Pavlou:

 

“All people are equal. You want to kill millions of people!”

 

That’s basically Leftism in a nutshell. That’s basically what it is. That’s the two main moral intuitions. Anyone who disagrees with that is a threat to them. Because if you’re, as I said, physically weak and physically unhealthy and you lack, in certain areas, a society that is hierarchically structured and where violence actually can exist, where you don’t have a guarantee of peace, where you can run your mouth and say whatever you want is a threat. It’s something that really undermines a social position.

 

But I would say that someone who is far-Right, and I think there’s some evidence to support this as well, is someone who basically has those three values that conservatives also have, sanctity, loyalty and respect for authority, but cares less about, equality and harm avoidance.

 

And so therefore, someone who is far-Right is someone who has a purely groupish morality, someone who is willing to basically face a society that [can] face violence, face force and face hierarchy, be subjected to the test of violence and hierarchy, because someone who is far-Right knows that ultimately that is what’s necessary to strengthen the group and to maximize the strength of the group.

 

So being far-Right, it’s actually the most purely selfless and the most collectivist of all the moral intuitions or moral points of view. I would say, therefore, it demonstrates that we’re actually the noble element in all of this. Conservatives have a noble element, but it’s kind of balanced out. They’re kind of like centrists that have a balancing between us and Leftists, which makes sense. And Leftists are just purely kind of like spiteful individualists that are willing to basically destroy the cohesion of the group and destroy the strength of the group in order to maximize their own personal self interest and protections and advantages and privileges. So under like a false moral pretence.

 

So I would say, like in response to all of these issues, I think the primary reason, I guess, why we’re facing the problems that we’re facing is because our morality has been pathologised. You know, we are seen as kind of scary. We’re seen as brutal because we have no regard for equality or harm avoidance. And if you’re a kind of a weak person, you’re afraid, or you just kind of, just generally don’t have the minerals, you’re afraid of the kind of brutality perhaps, of us enacting our moral vision. You’re afraid of the tough love!

 

And so my view, it’s just the nothing is going to really improve until people of our persuasion can build up a power base where we can seem like a necessary corrective, where society gets so bad and we can rise and become strong enough, where people say:

 

“Well, we have to turn to the far-Right. We have to turn to the bad boys to restore order because look at what a mess everything has descended into.”

 

So we need to become credible enough to be able to provide an alternative.

 

But at the same time, everything has to., … It’s not just that things will get worse and then people will become Nazis or something. I think Nazis have to become strong in addition to everything getting worse. And that’s when the Whiteman will eventually turn to us as a solution.

 

Like, if you look at 1930s Germany, you had the crisis of the Great Depression and all the problems with the Weimar Republic, but you also had a massive movement that showed strength and vitality and power that people could then turn to secure themselves.

 

So I think that’s ultimately the problem. It’s not just we’ve got the social conditions degrading that are necessary for the far-Right to rise, but the far-Right is not able to basically power through into a position of a genuine alternative. And it’s mostly because so much of the movement is preoccupied with, rather than just simply showing strength, building strength and exhibiting strength, they’re obsessed with trying to get our mentality to be translated into the moral values of conservatives or the moral values of Leftists even, and warp the language and warp the presentation and have the right kind of clean optics that makes our ideas more agreeable.

 

And I don’t think that can ever work, because ultimately what that is a form of acquiescence to the sensibilities of our opponents. I think the only way in which we can actually provide a credible challenge to the system is by tripling down upon our own morality, our own perspective, and just building up strength within our own perspective to the point where we seem like a powerful enough horse that could actually be backed, because we can credibly actually challenge for power.

 

So I think strength is all that really matters in politics.

 

You said that about Joe Biden the other day, that there’s one rule in politics, “don’t appear weak”. He broke that rule. That’s why he’s out. I think that was so true. I think ultimately, politics really comes down to, it’s ultimately a gang fight, at the end of the day.

 

[40:00]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Because people vote like a woman choosing a mate, a woman choosing a leader. People are feminine, and so they’re responsive to strength. And I don’t necessarily mean, you know, brutality or violence when I say strength. I just mean you know, stoicism, being above pettiness, holding yourself with confidence, you know, et cetera, et cetera. All of these things are very important. Putin’s very good at understanding this. That’s why he’s been in power so long in Russia.

 

You spoke of harm avoidance, and I realised there’s a quality that probably comes from our ethnicity or some sort of spiritual realm, if you’re into that kind of stuff. And it’s the romanticisation, I suppose you could call it, of harm avoidance. Like, I romanticize lack of harm avoidance is what I’m trying to say, meaning, like, enduring harm for the sake of something greater. It’s kind of the bread and butter of human romance for me.

 

Joel Davis: That’s bravery.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I wonder if that’s being used against us, wonder if our enemies understand that we’re willing to put ourselves in harm’s way, a minority of us anyway, and that might be understood and used against us somehow. I haven’t thought enough about it. But I do know that I romanticize having no harm avoidance. Well, I don’t have no harm avoidance. I have some harm avoidance. Obviously, I want to stay alive. But my past history in politics and activism shows that I’m willing to endure harm for the sake of what I believe, years of it.

 

And like I said, that’s a romantic thing for me. I think that’s something that every man should have. I don’t really understand men who don’t have that compulsion, but how that could be used against us could be interesting to explore in the future.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I was listening to a audiobook by Thomas Carlisle, who was a really famous. I don’t know whether you would call him a pure historian, but he’s kind of like a philosopher of history. He’s English, from the 19th century, and he was a romanticist. And in the first part, because he kind of has a heroic conception of history, history understood through the narrative of great men. Great men move history, according to Carlisle.

 

So it’s like the complete opposite of Marxism. You know, Marxism is a theory of history where classes and structural forces move history. And what individuals do doesn’t really matter because everything is subject to the dialectic of material relations between economic classes or whatever. And Carlyle is the complete antithesis. Carlyle is like:

 

“No! History is moved by great individuals, noble, heroic individuals, challenging epochs, challenging paradigms, and dragging civilisations, nations and civilisations into new realities.”

 

Anyway, Carlyle begins by talking about Germanic Paganism. And it’s quite an interesting discussion. And in his discussion of what is at the core, it’s the core value, ultimately, of Germanic or Norse Paganism or traditional Anglo Saxon Paganism. He just talks about how the ultimate virtue is bravery. You know, like the you go to Valhalla because you are a brave man. Odin sends his valkyries to collect brave souls after death, dying on battlefield, dying with valour, dying with honour. So that really is something that is at the core of our people’s ethos in some kind of essential way, that romanticism of bravery as the highest virtue that you just mentioned.

 

So I definitely agree. I agree with that in terms of how that’s weaponised against us, as you said. Yeah, that could be an interesting discussion. I’d have to think about that some more. Do you want to say something in response to that, or do you want to move on to another story?

 

Blair Cottrell: I think what’s on my mind now is the revelation made by Elon Musk in a Jordan Peterson interview that his eldest son in 2019, when his son Xavier was around about 18 years old, I think, became officially transgender, changed their name to Vivian. And Musk’s former wife. I’m assuming it’s his former wife, and the mother of Xavier conned Elon into signing a document which basically gave his permission for his son to start taking puberty blockers. I don’t know why permission was needed at 18. Maybe you can’t do it until 21 in America or wherever it is they are. But I thought that was a huge revelation for him to make publicly, and he’s kept that quiet since 2019. That’s, like, five years ago now.

 

And you can see how that’s probably influenced his activity in the past five years because he was really upset about it. His exact words were, and I found this really profound, that “my son is dead”. He said his son is dead. And what he means is Xavier, the boy he helped to raise, no longer exists. In the place of Xavier, there is this drug addicted, deluded Vivian.

 

And the image that came into my mind, you know how in that horror universe, Alien, where there’s those, like, facehuggers and they lay an egg inside you, I saw the transgender influence of being the facehugger that latched itself onto the face of this boy, Elon’s son, and laid this egg of twisted ideology and perspective inside of him. And then bursting forth from his carcass was Vivian! This new transgender character, you know, made possible through drugs.

 

But, it’s not really transgenderism, is it? Because I don’t actually believe that transgender is a thing. I’ve said it before. I think that as transvestites, I think that it’s drug addicted transvestites. Meaning they’re taking drugs that confuse them, change their hormones around a little bit, but not enough to actually biologically change them, because that’s not possible. And they dress up like the other sex.

 

[46:06]

 

So we’re not talking about transgenderism. There is no transgenderism. There’s just drug addicted transvestites. That’s all they are. And now that’s what Elon Musk’s son is. And his exact words, as I said, were:

 

“My son is dead! Killed by the woke mine virus!”

 

And he said to Peterson in this interview:

 

“Since then, I vowed to destroy the woke mine virus!”

 

And that’s pretty profound stuff. I actually did a little bit of research on who Elon Musk is, where he comes from, and a little bit learnt a little bit about his personality after that.

 

And I think he’s a guy who’s a lot more sensitive than most people who become very powerful in the realm of finance and business. He doesn’t seem to be like everyone else who gets, … I’m not blowing smoke up his arse or anything like that.

 

I mean, the guy’s really vehemently pro-Israel, and we’ll get into that a little bit, too, so we’ll discuss how that ties into the changing political landscape. But I just thought it was really profound that he came out with this. He revealed this about his personal family, his life. And the way he explained it, I think, was perfect. That when a child, or a young person becomes, quote, unquote, “transgender”, goes down that trajectory of drug abuse, hormone blockers, which Elon Musk describes as simply “sterilisation drugs”. And he said it wasn’t explained to him that that’s what they were when he signed the document allowing his son to take these drugs at the request of his former wife, too. Sorry. I know I’m pivoting from the point I was just closing with there, but I want to add this in, because this has been my perspective.

 

Isn’t it interesting that it’s always the fucking women pushing for children to be taking puberty blockers and transgender drugs to try to make them into another sex! Basically killing off their child and having this thing be born from its dead carcass that doesn’t understand what it is, and then, you know, is basically just addicted to drugs and its own delusions. It’s weird because women are supposed to be the caregivers, so why are women doing this to their children? I don’t know.

 

I guess we can get into that a little bit, too, and try to understand the psychology of these White women, who are mutilating their children for some fucking reason! I mean, is it all just for likes and attention on Instagram or Facebook? Is it all just to feel like they’re good people because they’re giving their child what they think they what the child thinks it wants, but really it’s not what the child wants. It’s just a result of how the child’s been influenced by decadent culture? I don’t know. What are your thoughts, Mr Davis?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, you open up a lot of interesting topics with that. I mean, first of all, I would say that Elon’s remarks I found to be a little bit befuddling because I also saw him say on Twitter about this, that:

 

“Oh, well, my son was just a homosexual.”

 

And then these doctors convinced him that to this transgender nonsense!

 

And so if your son is a homosexual, well, then he’s basically dead, also.

 

I mean, the genetic line is done at that point,. So I’m not saying that:

 

“Well, what’s the difference?”

 

Obviously, transgenderism is even worse! But I know at that point, like, when you have a homosexual son, it’s basically over anyway.

 

So the fact that he’s kind of fine with that, but not fine with transgenderism, I didn’t think actually made any sense:

 

“Oh, he’s been sterilised!”

 

It’s like, yeah, but he was going to have sodomy instead of sex with a woman anyway, so he’s already sterilised by his own homosexuality. So I thought that was a little incoherent, but yeah.

 

Second of all, you know, Elon Musk you mentioned his celebration of Israel, his sycophantic love of Israel that has come about over the last year in a very explicit way, all of a sudden. He seemed to be like last year he seemed to almost be leaning in our direction and criticising the jews in a kind of in a soft core way. And it was quite interesting. And then he snapped back into a kind of very rigid pro-jewish stance after that.

 

Netanyahu just travelled to Washington, DC to give a speech, you know, early this morning, Australian time, and Elon Musk personally went to the Congress to go and see the speech.

 

And I remember when he did get in trouble, originally from the jews for basically criticising them. And in a certain way on Twitter. He went and he went to Auschwitz, and he was on a stage with Ben Shapiro and just did all of these, you know, really good goy, shabbos goy kind of signaling activities to re ingratiate himself with the jews. And he was on the stage sitting next to Ben Shapiro, and Elon Musk said something to the effect of:

 

“I’m not a jew, but I’m jew-ish.”

 

Implying that he must have some jewish ancestry or something. I know that one of the women that he has had children with has jewish ancestry, at least, in addition to that.

 

So, anyway, the point is, if you’re really so upset about transgenderism, well, why don’t you do a little bit of a trace and see where the hell did this transgenderism come from? And it’s one of those every single time moments. You trace it right back to jews! Whether we want to go back to the Weimar Republic and the jewish doctors that invented it, quote, unquote, “doctors, sexologists”, quote, unquote, “that invented it”, the pervert freaks that invented it.

 

But also in its modern or more contemporary iteration, it has been pushed in the United States by, particularly the Pritzker family, which are one of the billionaire jewish families, really influential in American politics, particularly in the Democrat party. They’ve been one of the biggest backers of transgenderism, as have many other jewish organisations and interests. So, it’s basically the “woke mind virus”, so to speak, is a “jewish mind virus”.

 

[52:16]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: I think the Nazis in Germany, as they were coming to power, burned down the world’s first transgender clinic. I saw a story on that years ago. I can’t remember all the details, but I thought that was significant.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. When they were doing the book burnings, they were basically burning books. They were probably burning some communist books, but they were burning a lot of this kind of gender ideology stuff that was being spread in the Weimar Rebublic.

 

Blair Cottrell: There was actually a clinic, though. It was like the first ever clinic for actually trying to change men into women or vice versa. And that entire building was burned down by the Nazis back in the day.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

And anyway, so I thought that was interesting, that he apparently is going to war against the work mind virus, but he’s fine with homosexuality and he’s fine with jews. It’s like this doesn’t really seem that coherent.

 

But anyway, those are a few of my initial thoughts. In addition, when you mentioned that his ex-wife, … He has many ex-wives and women that he’s had children with, and it just really exposes the stupidity of that breeding strategy, where instead of picking one quality woman that has the Right psychological constitution, he’s got this philosophy of, let’s just have as many kids as possible. I’m a billionaire, so I can afford to just, basically pay infinite child support. And so he’s knocked up a whole bunch of women.

 

But you know, this woman is transing his kid. I remember Grimes, one of the other women that he’s had children with, also made pro-transgender comments and so on, refusing, I think, when they had a kid, she was saying something how she refused to basically give it a gender, gender pronouns or something when it was a baby, and they had like, a kind of public spat over it on Twitter back in the day. I remember seeing something like that years ago.

 

So he keeps picking these really horrible women that are obviously themselves mentally unwell, which probably indicates, … I’ve been reading this book by Edward Dutton recently that was just released by Imperium Press called Woke Eugenics, where Edward Dutton advances this thesis that because in industrial society, infant mortality has fallen from almost 50% to 1%. Previously, before the industrial revolution, babies that had high mutational load, because even if you have two genetically healthy parents, if they have enough kids, eventually one will be a mutant. Because that’s just kind of how it works. The combination is just keep iterating. Eventually you get, like a mutant baby. Well, in pre-industrial Europe, that baby would probably wouldn’t survive the first year or two of its life, because it would just mutate. It would just get sick and die.

 

But with modern Medicine, we can keep those babies alive and then enable them to breathe and so on and so genetic mutations have spread rapidly through the White population. And then Dutton then points out a whole bunch of research that links all these different correlates of Left-wing political belief with genetic mutation, particularly coming to things like mental illness.

 

And then he posits that the wokeness, in a certain sense, is the genetic trash taking itself out, that it’s this kind of evolutionary mechanism whereby the mutant Leftists develop a series of memes that prevent them from passing on their genes to further generations. They take themselves back out of the gene pool so that only the more healthy, conservative and Right-wing people breed. And all these mutant bloodlines just kind of eviscerate themselves to kind of restrengthen the race.

 

And it’s an interesting idea, and that’s probably an example. We say, what are these insane women doing with the abortion and transing the kids and I and raising their kids to not have a gender identity and so on? What is this all about? Encouraging their daughters to not have children young and go and get a career? And what are all these behaviours about or delaying childbirth until very late?

 

Ultimately, what all these behaviours sum total to is basically not passing on their genes, more or less. There’s a decent amount of heritability in traits that predispose you to Left-wing political belief. So kind of like wokeness is like the trash taking itself out, basically. It’s just like all the genetic trash of the White race, like throwing itself into an oblivion.

 

And so that’s why you have to be very careful which woman you select.

 

Because if you have children with a woman that is psychologically Leftist or really psychologically unwell. And I know people could say all women are crazy, but no, there’s a difference between a normal kind of feminine crazy, which is just feminine hormones and so on, and like abortions, transing the kids crazy! And just complete lack of maternal instinct. Maternal instinct is supposed to be life affirming and life giving. It’s supposed to be fundamentally about nurturing the children and putting them in a position where they can then breed successfully and so on down the generation. It’s supposed to be enriching and protecting the bloodline so that it continues.

 

But this you know, this kind of Left-wing femininity is the complete opposite. It’s like this kind of self destructive tendency. If you breed with that doesn’t matter if you have eight kids and you’ve got all this money, your bloodlines are still on a trajectory towards oblivion, whether it be through all these different methods, sexual perversion or just nihilistic delaying of breeding to the point where you run past the window, you run out the clock, or outbreeding with other races or whatever.

 

And so then what’s the point? It’s much better to just pick one actually mentally healthy woman and make it work with her and actually have some kids that will end up just being normal and having normal families themselves and so on. So that there’s still, in his case, little Musks running around in a thousand years. Otherwise, what was this all for?

 

So I think that really shows the kind of perversity of his mindset.

 

[58:47]

Blair Cottrell: What about the mindset of the women who do this to their children? Any thoughts on that?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I mean, obviously they’re just completely mentally unwell, so.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s a must have some sort of motivation. They still must be compelled by something other than just insanity or mental illness. Because these women started off as relatively normal people. Like, they were born, they were little girls, and they grew up just like anybody else. Then they had their own children, and then they’re giving their children sterilisation drugs and mutilating them to become different gender. Why are they doing that? Why is it always the women? It’s never the men doing this to their children. The men are always opposed to it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I guess the idea is that there’s this idea that within the feminine nature, there isn’t just a life instinct, but there’s also a death instinct. You know, if we go back to, like, Mesopotamian mythology, the female deities, they were depicted as, like, fire goddesses that not just gave life, but also death. And Mother Nature kind of had this kind of, it’s a life giving quality, but also a destructive quality. It takes the trash out. And the gene pool has become so perverted by modernity, there’s so many mutant freaks out there, that there’s probably this kind of death instinct within the feminine that is engaging in this kind of arc of self destruction, cleaning out all of the defective bloodlines. And so that’s kind of, I guess, one way of explaining why we’re seeing this.

 

There was this one experiment that I found out about recently, and I’m surprised I didn’t know about it sooner, where these scientists got all these rats, and they created a rat enclosure that basically provided them with all the necessities of life so that they had basically everything that they needed.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like the rodent utopia experiment. Is that what you’re referring to?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, And then over time the rodents start developing all these mental illnesses, and they become homosexual, they become depressed, and then a whole series of killer rodents rise up and just murder all the other ones. And that’s kind of, I think maybe what’s happening in modernity, that modernity is too good, that nature couldn’t do its thing of basically selecting out all the bad blood.

 

And so we’ve had so much dysgenic breeding, and all the bad blood has been kept alive by modern science and egalitarian social mores, that now the death instinct, that’s what all this, you know, feminism and gay rights and this kind of scorn, pathological femininity, what all of these forces are like, Kamala Harris is an example of this. She’s like a mixed race woman in her sixties with no children. So she’s obviously got this kind of mutant defect.

 

And then, you know, she’s, like, now going to be the poster woman of basically Leftism in the presidential run. And she has this kind of sassy girl, boss energy. But she’s a complete idiot.

 

You know, that is the that is the kind of, as I said, the kind of trash taking itself out where there’s so much defective blood out there that it has this internal drive, maybe programmed into it by Mother Nature to just destroy itself because it’s not supposed to exist.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, interestingly, I remember that rodent utopia experiment, well. I think it was mice in some of the experiments, rather than rats. And because they had unlimited food, the rodents that started out in the experiment, that just ate a lot. They had a lot of children. These were kind of like the baby boomer generation. They got really fat, lots of kids.

 

And as their kids grew up, though, the kids resented their parents. And the rats, the main rats, the first ones, the ones beginning in the experiment, the ones that got fat, they were out during the day, but their children would actually stay in the enclosures that they had for them all day and would only come out at night. And they were very anti-social, very lethargic. And they started to turn gay. They started turning gay and weird and really violent as well. And they eventually just all killed each other. That’s how the experiment ended every time.

 

And the determination or the conclusion for the experiment, they did it multiple times to see if they got the same result, and they did. The conclusion was, without natural selection and the struggle for daily bread, a species can’t survive. It just destroys itself.

 

[1:03:39]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly!

 

And you can see that maybe that’s the White race. We created a civilisation that was too good for our own good. So then one idea developed, which was eugenics and National Socialism and building an entire society around struggle. And artificially taking over the natural selective process in order to simulate nature in order to keep the blood healthy.

 

And then another idea arose, which is quadrupling down upon egalitarianism, which is this Leftist idea. And obviously, the Leftist idea won because of how World War Two went. And what is that idea? Well, that idea is kind of like a dark eugenics. It ultimately will produce the same outcome, because by inviting in all of these foreign races and proliferating all of these degenerate ideologies, ultimately what they are doing is they’re creating a selection event. They’re creating conditions under which the majority of the White race now won’t survive.

 

So now it’s like, what elements of the White race can survive this crisis that we’ve (((self))) constructed? It’s only going to be those that are able to basically adapt to it. Which means how are you able to create bloodlines that are going to survive institutionalised, psycho-cultural memetic mass suicide?

 

And so those of us that can adapt will be the only White people left and then the blood will be re-purified and we’ll then go on to create probably another civilisation and probably it will be too good and maybe the same process will happen again. Maybe that’s just how nature works.

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe, hopefully we can break the cycle and achieve something greater in one of our civilisational, … God, how would you describe it? Periods?

 

But it’s all very interesting. And exploring human psychology is something that you can do for a long time. You can really go down a rabbit hole with it.

 

But I think unfortunately, people seem to be more bad than they are good, which is why they’re more easily led by their bad instincts, and which is why violence, terror, fear usually produce the best results in governing them. I think people are capable of being better, but I think we have taken the easy route which is appealing to people’s lower instincts, because that’s going to result in faster success and faster profits.

 

And the problem with this is we’re breeding a dumber race! We’re dumbing people down, we’re making people worse than they need to be in order to profit from them and in order to make them easier to control. And that’s the trajectory that we’re on a civilisational level. And there’s only one place that goes, and it’s not to some sort of higher culture or greater civilisational achievement or even greater technology. I even think we’re starting to see technology plateau, reach the limits. Like you get a new phone these days and it’s basically the same phone from six years ago, just maybe with a slightly better battery. But that’s because it’s just new and it hasn’t been used yet. It’s like technology is kind of almost capped now. Where technology is seeming to develop is with AI, but where that’s going to go is anyone’s guess.

 

But I think society is going in the opposite trajectory, compared with where it should be going. And what we believe is essentially antithetical to the current system because we believe in higher breeding, we believe in actually having children who are genetically better than us, smarter than us, stronger than us, and that would send society in the opposite direction. I suppose in order to implement a culture that was beneficial to what we understand to be humanity, we would have to stop appealing to people’s lower instincts. For the time being to actually get power. I think we still need to appeal to the lower instincts of people because that’s the only way to actually get people’s attention and to get people to trust and have faith in you, as the Churches understand better than anyone.

 

But I think long term we would have to gradually try to stop doing that. There would have to be a long multi-generational project where we actually would have to ban certain advertisers and expressions of certain political persuasions that were appealing to the lower instincts of people because the results of that we can see for ourselves.

 

I don’t know if you guys have noticed this, but when you go out in public these days, people have really bad spatial awareness now. I mean, 20 years ago, 25 years ago, people would be able to feel when you were close to them.

 

And I’ve said this a few times on stream because it’s really significant. It’s a significant change that I’ve noticed in people now where there’s so little consideration for what’s going on around them or for people walking in their path, people being close to them.

 

Especially true with Zoomers. You know, Zoomers have got their good qualities. But when I’m in the gym, man, I’m surrounded by these broccoli haired fucking kids that are standing, like right next to me. Like, right fucking! Their shoulders are almost touching mine. And I’m a guy that’s got a pretty intense aura, I think, like, you can feel when I’m there. I’m not a small person, not physically nor spiritually. Right? But they just don’t seem to pick up on my energy. They don’t seem to understand that them standing that close to me, working out right near me like that is fucking annoying, man! Like, it’s not just annoying, it’s just inappropriate and weird as well.

 

But I think there’s some sort of damage that’s being done. The intuitive senses of the Zoomers, probably as a result of early exposure to too great a technology. I spoke about this with you last time we talked as well. I think one of the benefits of being born in my generation is we became very adaptable. We had to be adaptable because we saw technology change very quickly. We experienced literally landline phones on the wall. That’s all we had.

 

And then the first mobile phones were coming in when I was like ten or eleven, but we didn’t get them yet because they were too expensive. And then by the time we were like 14, we had Nokias or something. Then the Internet gets introduced and we’re all on, like, file sharing programs like Kazar and Limewire, which aren’t around anymore. Then we get the first ever social media. Like, with there’s probably stuff that predated MySpace, but then there was MySpace, and everyone moved over to Facebook when I was about 18. And then suddenly there was iPhones and smartphone technology.

 

And basically we had to leave behind old stuff in the old ways, and we had to adapt to the new very quickly. This technology was introduced and developed, evolved very quickly, and so we had to develop very quickly along with it. But we were used to sort of a different range of experiences.

 

Like, I grew up in a sort of a pre-technological era, you might argue, where I was riding bikes and skating with the kids on the street, and we didn’t have phones, we didn’t have Internet. The only people I knew at that time in my life when I was a kid were the people in my immediate community, right? And I wasn’t connected with the rest of the world. I didn’t understand what was going on in the world, and I didn’t really need to or want to. And that feels like you remember times like that with nostalgia because it feels like a simpler time.

 

Probably because you weren’t so connected and plugged into everything everyone else was doing all the time, and you weren’t so worried about the online presentation that you were making and staying relevant and all that sort of stuff. Like everything that people are worried about now. People probably have access to too much information now, which is why on the back of the iPhones, there’s a picture of an Apple with a bite taken out of it, right? Like the forbidden fruit of knowledge. Maybe there’s a bit of a conspiracy around that. I don’t know if I believe it, but it’s interesting.

 

But the point is the Zoomers, they just had smartphones and iPads when they were like five years old. They didn’t understand any sort of life before that where there was any delayed dopamine response, where they actually had to wait for something to come out or they had to wait for something to load, or they had to put some sort of time in to achieve something. They became accustomed to instant gratification, instant reward, everything loading instantly, everything being right before them right away, getting what they want right away. Their parents all got divorced, too.

 

[1:11:44]

 

So what happens? The dad’s trying to win the affections of the child, as is the mother. They’re competing against each other, and they’re just buying the kid everything. The kid gets whatever they want from their dad, whatever they want from their mom, more than they could possibly ever want. And as a result, it contributes to that down regulation of the dopamine response.

 

And I think Zoomers are fucking cooked! I think they’re too cooked to have the intuitive sense to understand that they’re standing too close to you. There’s something that’s happened to them that’s shrunk down their auras. It’s like they’re small spiritually. Their presence is small, contained in some weird way. And it could, I think, have something to do with the introduction or them being introduced to technology too early in life. That was giving them too fast response of dopamine, as I just explained.

 

But, yeah, there’s an interesting difference in the generations, and I think it’s influenced largely by how technology is developed.

 

But am still glad, as I said, that I grew up in the time I grew up in, because I got to experience what life was like before all this shit existed. And I still remember it fondly. Like, I would prefer. I would still prefer to live in a world where there was no Internet, straight up. Everything would just be much smaller and simpler. Everyone’s world would be much smaller and simpler. Everyone would be more immediately community focused and less tied in with international nonsense that didn’t actually mean anything to them in any meaningful way, in any significant way, and is what I’m trying to say. So I think everything changed with the Internet.

 

Someone asked recently, they’re like:

 

“What do you think caused all the political extremism and all the turmoil across the world and shit?”

 

I said to them:

 

“I think there was always radicals and extremism and turmoil, but I think everyone just being able to see it and everyone being able to contribute to it, even in some small way, with an opinion, and everyone thinking their opinion fucking means something. It doesn’t.”

 

If you’re watching this, your opinion means fuck! All my opinion means fuck all. No one’s that important. No one’s that special. Everyone thinks they are. And that’s one of the ways they manipulate you, actually.

 

But, yeah, I’m just kind of rambling at this point. [chuckling] But the fundamental purpose, or the reason I was bringing this point up is I’m frustrated by the lack of consideration and energy observance or energy awareness of the average person out there. And I’ve, as I’ve probably just demonstrated, I’ve thought to some length about what’s causing people to be this way. And I do think it comes down to people just being cooked on a level of their meaning. Their dopamine response rate is just completely fucking fried out from too much instant gratification through technologies.

 

But anyway, I digress.

 

[1:14:39]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I would say that I’m thankful that the Internet exists because the people in my immediate vicinity would have been really boring. And through the Internet, I’ve been able to have a far more interesting social experience because you can put out a unique signal and then basically transmit it across the entire world and then draw people in from a much larger pool to find people who vibe with you. So I’m actually, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You could have just made pamphlets.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I don’t know. I’m a little bit of like an international citizen, I guess. I like being a participant in the entire world rather than just the kind of what’s [chuckling] happening in Australia, which could be, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Sort of like the people who are at home here, there and everywhere. Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: I mean, international, Anglo. That’s the thing we have a global empire. I have an imperial mindset. I don’t have a narrow Australian parochialism. The Anglo Saxon is a global ethnic group. I like being plugged into all of our affairs around the world.

 

And actually, Australia always, like, has been part of an empire and will necessarily need to be. We were talking about this before, like, if we had a situation in which the United States lost the war with China and Australia became basically subsumed under Chinese influence, obviously the current situation, we’re being replaced, but maybe it could be reversed. Maybe if Whites could get back control of the West, it could be reversed. But if we basically disconnected from the West because the imperial power projection of North America and Europe is basically kicked out of our region, then it’s over for White Australia. Like, now we’re basically stuck in a Chinese run region. And I just don’t think we would have the capacity to defend White Australia under those conditions without any assistance.

 

And that was basically what Australian foreign policy has been built around from the very beginning. That’s why we fought for the British Empire. That’s why we basically signed up to the American led international order as soon as the British Empire collapsed. Because our founders understood this Australia was an outpost of the White race or the British race on the other side of the planet.

 

So to me Australian politics is inextricable from the global situation of the European race. And so also, I think the same is true for culture. So, yeah, I don’t, therefore, I don’t have a super narrow minded parochialism.

 

I mean, there is a certain amount of childhood nostalgia that I guess you can tap into that has a certain value. But and, yes the Internet kind of makes everything bad, worse, obviously. Like, you wouldn’t probably have transgenderism if it wasn’t for the Internet on, like, a mass scale. Like, it accelerates everything, but it also can accelerate things in our direction as well. Like, we wouldn’t be able to grow our movement if the Internet didn’t exist. Like, we have no capacity to build our own television networks and national newspapers and things like that.

 

We never would have been able to compete with the jewish media or the establishment without the Internet. And you could say the Internet is also controlled, and so we can’t really compete on a level playing field. But at least we have a fighting chance on the Internet, where we had absolutely no chance under the previous paradigm, which is why from the 1960s to the development of the Internet, we were just basically constantly taking L’s. And only since the Internet became ubiquitous has there been a little bit of a counter revolution, has there been a little bit of a punchback from the Right. And the far-Right has kind of reconstituted itself and managed to get our talking points and our ideology out there again.

 

So I think the Internet makes everything bad, worse, but it also makes a lot of good things now possible that previously wouldn’t have been possible.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, there’s pros and cons. I just still think, well, look, people are much. People are actually easier to control before the Internet launched for special interest groups with influence and power and the wealth necessary to maintain that power.

 

What I mean is, they could have everyone in the West thinking the same thing, just with a few TV channels, because no one had alternative news sources. Like, everyone just watched the same channels, and so everyone thought the same thing. Problem now, especially with the youth, is they don’t watch TV. The youth are on social media applications, but also trolling the Internet and finding information from, how should I say, unfiltered sources.

 

And as a result, people have kind of split up. Like, remember how everyone used to like the same songs, basically, like, everyone had, … And I’m talking about normal people, so don’t personalise this. But normal people, you would only hear new songs on the radio, and there was a few genres, and everyone had a favourite band or genre that was probably something from the radio, because that’s the only place where people got music from.

 

Now, the different genres of music and styles of music and artists there’s thousands of them! And everyone likes weird stuff now that I’ve never even heard of and that’s because I think the Internet obviously has made this possible.

 

But I think the thing that I deal with on a daily basis, especially with younger people, is I see how social media and the Internet has negatively affected real life social interactions. Have you been through, like, a drive through lately, like, for KFC or something? You’ll say:

 

“Hey, I’ll get a large Zinger Stacker Burger meal with water for the drink, please.”

 

And then the response will be:

 

“Okay, what size was that?”

 

And I’ll say:

 

“Large.”

 

And they say:

 

“Okay, and what drink would you like?”

 

And I’m thinking, I already said all this, but they didn’t listen. They were only able to listen to one aspect of my request at a time. “Zinger Stacker Burger” was all they heard, even though I said everything that I wanted. And that’s a new phenomenon that never used to happen 20, 25 years ago. And when you speak to young people, it’s like they don’t know how to use basic manners.

 

But now it just seemed like I’m ranting about young people! Like, maybe I’m getting old?

 

Joel Davis: Boomer coded rant! That’s fine.

 

Blair Cottrell: Am I the boomer now?

 

Joel Davis: [words unclear] They’re fucking retards!

 

Blair Cottrell: One more thing while I’m on the train, actually, while I’m on the rant train about young people, I noticed something else I don’t like about young people.

 

But look, it’s not really something I don’t like. It’s just an objective observation. Despite some of these people actually knowing my personal history. Like, I was into street fights, and I was selling drugs, and then I went to jail. And then I was a popular political spokesperson on live TV panels and stuff. And then I got censored hard, shut down from Facebook, and three years through court for hate speech. And now here I am on this stream with Joel every week.

 

You would think they would ask me questions like they’re interested in politics, some of them. You would think they would ask me some questions, but they don’t. They just talk about themselves and their own ideas. And they just tell me how to think about certain philosophies and how smart they are. And how they came to think the way they do it. I’m just like:

 

“Huh, huh. Tell me more. And when did that happen? How long did that take? Yeah, tell me more.”

 

But inside I’m thinking:

 

“You fucking retards!”

 

You’re standing here before someone who has more life experience than average, I would say. And I used to ask people questions all the time when I was young, especially in the gym, the bigger guys and stuff. But all I did was ask questions because I wanted to learn. But I noticed young people struggle to do that. Now all they want to do is fucking talk about themselves!

 

And I suppose it ties back into that fried out dopamine response rate. They’re probably just geared towards the sort of social interaction and behaviour that’s going to give them the highest reward. And asking questions and actually listening to responses and waiting while they listen, that kind of thing. Like, that’s not really going to give you as much as a reward, like, chemical reward response in the brain as talking about yourself is. And I suppose that’s why they do so much talking about themselves, maybe.

 

But like I said, am I the am I the old one now? Am I just saying:

 

“Oh, back in my day!”

 

I mean, I’m only 35 this year. I’m not that old. But I suppose that’s approaching middle age, or maybe it is middle age. It’s definitely middle aged for me. I won’t be living past 70, not with the choices I’ve made. God won’t allow it. So I’m probably about halfway through my life.

 

Don’t take offence if you’re a young person. I still appreciate that. Fire a young spirit. I’ve said this. You don’t lose your youthful vigor. You say vig-or, don’t you, Joel? Not vi-gor. You say vig-or?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: You don’t lose your vigorousness. I mean, problem with getting older is, you see people lose their passion. They become burned out. They just get tired and lazy. And they get, I suppose, more susceptible to that harm reduction that we spoke about earlier. They’re worried about losing the little things they have, and they think that’s wisdom and growing up, but it’s not really. It’s just cowardice and laziness!

 

And what I love about the youth is they’re willing to take risks still. They still have that energy, that bravery, as Joel put it earlier, which in a lot of people can die out as they get older. As they get older, their bravery can die. And I’ve taken certain steps to make sure that my youthful boldness doesn’t die out as I age. I think it’s important to do that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I agree with that. But should we get to talk about any other stories?

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. We had a really big week. I missed the stream most of it. I got the end of it last week, but it was a huge news week last week.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

So this is another Noticer article:

 

“Young nationalists marched through Vienna demanding mass deportations with banner reading, ‘The Kids Want Re-migration’.”

 

This is Martin Selner’s boys over in Austria, the Identitarians, they were chanting:

 

“Fortress Europe! Re-migration! Close the borders!”

 

And they look pretty good. They look healthy young people. They look normal and yeah, I saw some videos of it going around. I feel like the Austrians really set a good standard for activism, and they’re very influential in Austrian politics. Austrian politics is a lot more Right-wing. The attitudes of the people are a lot more anti-immigration, on average, than most of the European countries and here.

 

Blair Cottrell: Did Austria, …

 

Joel Davis: Something to, like, admire or look up to this is what’s possible. Nationalist movement can develop and grow. And Martin Selner has been around for over a decade. A lot of work has gone into refining and building their street movement over there, but it seems like it’s going strong.

 

Blair Cottrell: So did Austria ever experience communism on a government level?

 

Joel Davis: No.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay. But they were pretty close to it, I suppose.

 

[1:26:38]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yes, they were right on the border. I think part of what has made Austria resilient is Austria never joined NATO. They kind of stayed neutral between the two sides in the Cold War somewhat. And Austria, of course, they still have the kind of anti-Nazi programming, but they didn’t get completely reprogrammed to the extent that the Germans did. And Austrians are basically Germans. They speak German, they’re part of the Germanosphere. So it’s maybe an example of where the Germans would be if they had a little bit less of the de-Nazification. And Austria used to be part of the Austro-Hungarian empire. Obviously, Hungary fell to communism, but Hungary is very Right-wing, and obviously, and they’re very resistant to immigration, and so is the Czech Republic in that area. That central European area is quite resilient against mass migration and quite nationalistic.

 

So, yeah, they’re definitely case studies worth looking at. How come they’re resistant? You could say partly it’s because of the Cold War conditions. And so on, but, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, hey, we’re talking about. Sorry, I just asked a stupid question. We’re talking about Austria, not Hungary. For some reason I had Hungary in my head. That’s why I asked if they experienced communism. Did the Hungarian people experience communism?

 

Joel Davis: Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s what I was thinking. Sorry, I got Austria and Hungary confused there for some reason. Sorry about that, guys.

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, no, it’s just good to see the Austrians making progress. I think the Freedom Party of Austria, which is the largest Right-wing party in Austria, I think they’ve decided to include remigration policies in their official platform. And they they’re getting over a quarter of the vote, I think, in a lot of polls. And in the recent European elections, they did very well. So Austrian politics is one of the more white pilling of the European countries.

 

So I think that’s a bit of a good news story. It shows that there’s examples of countries where everything., … They’ve still got all the same problems, of course, that we have in other Western countries, but they just seem to have more of a resilient opposition movement.

 

And so there’s a model to look to in some of these European countries to emulate. In Australia, I think we should be studying some of these central European countries in particular, trying to copy some of the things that they’ve done, not necessarily copy and paste, because it’s different conditions, different culture, obviously, in Australia. I think in Australia, we have to be a little bit more edgy, a little bit more bombastic, a little bit more, because Australia, that’s the Australian personality. We’re very like, no bullshit, get to the point! And we kind of have a little bit of that, like, convict energy in our. In our collective psyche. So you kind of need to have a little bit that outlaw element, a little bit of that abrasive bogan quality, but intermixed with a no bullshit attitude.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s what made me popular. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yes, of course. So I think a lot of other countries will look at us and say:

 

“Oh, the Aussies go a little bit too far!”

 

But I think that you have to in the Australian environment. I think in our culture, if you try to copy and paste too much from these other countries, I think you would end up coming across, like nerds, to a large portion of the Australian population.

 

And the problem that we have in Australia isn’t even, like, winning the argument. A lot of Australians are quite willing to hear our arguments, but it’s about making them give a fuck! A lot of us, we have a very apolitical society. Like, if you look at the opinion polls on Australian attitudes towards immigration, we actually have far more anti-immigration attitudes in our population than any other country in the Anglo-sphere and most countries in Europe.

 

But we have some of the worst Right-wing politics of any Western country because of how apolitical everyone is if you ask them:

 

“Oh, yeah, there’s too many immigrants!”

 

But then they just completely checked out of politics.

 

So we have to find a way to make people find politics interesting and get engaged in politics. And so then we have to kind of attune ourselves to the nuances of the Australian psyche. I think it’s a different problem for a lot of other countries. I talk about this before. Like, in America, it’s a very political society. So their problem isn’t that people don’t care about politics in America, but their problem is that people get sucked into the wrong kind of politics.

 

So it’s a completely different issue in America than in Australia. And I don’t know too much about Austrian culture, but anyway, it’s just good to see White power, global White power. So we support all nationalists everywhere doing anything, and have a lot of respect for the Austrians, that’s for sure.

 

Blair Cottrell: That remigration, mass deportation slogans seems to be becoming popular. It’s like amongst the general working class. I mean, there’s not a lot of disagreement, from what I can tell, with that particular message. I mean, people don’t want Africans living here. They don’t want free entry from India.

 

I mean, there’s 1.6 billion people in India! And we don’t want all those people coming here to Australia. Like, every working class Australian would agree with that. Most Indiana residents would agree with that, too in Australia, I think! [chuckling] Like, even I’ve seen some posts from Indian people saying:

 

“We’ve got to stop bringing in all these Indians!”

 

And they themselves are Indian!

 

But, yeah, like I said, the remigration thing, the mass deportation slogan, it’s generating some support from the working class, even here in Australia, from what you describe as an apolitical society. Very atheistic, too, if you’re watching this and you’re not from Australia. Australians aren’t very big on religion or politics, so it’s really hard to get through to them with anything.

 

As Joel suggested, the best way to penetrate their ignorance is just through being like them, being one of them and having that robust, vigorous patriotism and just kind of calling it as it is, pushing things to the point of being abrasive, taking some damage in the process from the institutions and the repercussions that come from these institutions.

 

They respect all of that, they liked seeing someone stand up. They love an underdog Australians! They love seeing someone who doesn’t have power. Yeah. Who doesn’t have wealth, stand up and win or make something of himself, or at least just create controversy to the extent where the system, the government, the police are pulling their hair out. The Australian working class loves seeing that! So I think that’s worth knowing.

 

[1:33:39]

 

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, one of the only countries in the world that would lionise a figure like Ned Kelly as a national hero with, you know, Ned Kelly was, for those who don’t know, just basically a gangster of the people, basically. [chuckling] That’s what he was!

 

Blair Cottrell: He was a bank robber. He was treated unfairly by the authorities and he ended up becoming a bank robber, I think. But, yeah, it was basically just a renegade bank robber. But he had his own principles and he felt like, as an Irishman, …

 

Joel Davis: No only robbed banks, he’d also burned the mortgage records of everyone in the town, so everyone loved him. And then he’d shout a night out on the piss. When the police showed up the people:

 

“Oh, we didn’t see him!”

 

Because he just burned, … They weren’t going to cooperate with the authorities. This guy just basically forgave their mortgage and shouted them on the beers. [chuckling] so, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Bit of an Australian Robin Hood, in a way, Ned Kelly, up against the rich, representing the little guy. And he had sympathies for the little guy, but he was an Irishman and as the story goes, he was experiencing some serious oppression from the Victoria police, which was largely British or English. And they had a bit of a, how should I say, racist sentiment towards the Irish settlers, you know. So there’s always been racism in Australia, even between Europeans.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I don’t know if that would be racism. That’s more just kind of ethnic conflict. But, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, that was the greatest racism we really expressed or experienced for thousands of years was just against others who were still kind of like cousins to us, but they were still different enough to be weird, you know what I mean? [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: We fought the Muslims. We kicked the Muslims out. A lot of our people, the Brits and the Irish, went down to Spain to help the Reconquista and kick all the Moors out of Spain and fought in the Crusades, and we kicked the Muslims out of the Balkans. And they got as far as almost, basically, almost all the way to Austria at one point. So no, race war has kind of been almost a perennial reality in European history. I mean, yes, as we kind of protected it from it more in Britain and Ireland than almost anywhere else, because it’s one of the absolute most secure zones for the White race, historically speaking.

 

But, yeah, of course, it’s a different kettle of fish in Australia. We get here and we’ve got abos and Chinese are coming over to the gold fields and there’s a different paradigm, similar to what the Americans experienced in North America, where they’re fighting the Mexicans and the Native Americans, and then you got black slaves to deal with and so on.

 

And so we kind of threw ourselves into a bit of a racial meat grinder. But, no, I hear what you’re saying. Like, in those days, the Irish and the English and their mutual rivalry kind of was what was the kind of dominant issue in Australia, because Aboriginals, we had obviously, a massive power advantage over them.

 

And one of the key precipitating, …

 

Blair Cottrell: They were never seen as a legitimate, like, organised threat, the Aboriginals, because they weren’t.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. One of the precipitating factors of White nationalism developing in Australia was the Chinese coming over, not the Aboriginals. The Chinese coming over. Then a bunch of English, Irish and Scotsmen realised:

 

“You know what? Yeah, we’ve got our little disputes with one another, but we’re all White men and we’ve got to get these chinks out!”

 

And so an amount of White unity formed around a mutual threat, which is obviously how these things often go.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, as I was saying earlier, we had a big news week last time you and Tom covered a lot of that stuff, and I chimed in on the end. I’m pretty ready to wrap this show up and have an early one this week if you’re keen. You got a Superchat?

 

Joel Davis: Okay. This wasn’t a Superchat, but I saw someone mention in the Odysee chat. “Mass Deportation Party, MDP”. I like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, maybe. Maybe?

 

[1:38:01]

 

Joel Davis: I like that’s cool! I like that. I like it. That’s all! I got a couple Entropy Superchats. One is from Borderland Rising. He said:

 

“Blair clicking his fingers when talking about Zoomers was fucking hilarious! Good show, lads. Keep it up.”

 

Thank you. And Ravenkeeper said:

 

“Greetings from the United States. Thanks to you, Blair and Tom, for all your great work! Have either of you been to the United States? If so, where? And what were your impressions?”

 

Blair, you never left the country, have you?

 

Oh, might be frozen. I don’t know if, … Blair’s frozen. Okay, I guess I’ll just answer this Superchat, then. Put ones in the chat if you can still hear me. Okay. Blair just dropped off.

 

I have been to the United States quite a few times. I’ve been to New York and just the tri-state area, I’ve been to Florida. I’ve been to Texas briefly, California briefly, and Hawaii. And my impressions of America are, I love the food. The portion sizes are massive! How good is the food? And so on. Yes. Like, particularly Texas had some really good steaks. I do like, whenever you get to the kind of White suburban areas in America where you get away from the major cities, and you get out into the White flight, it’s beautiful. And the people are really wholesome. There’s a big difference between Americans and Australians. Americans are super friendly, they’re super enthusiastic, and they’re quite warm. And I definitely appreciate that about them. So do like that aspect about Americans and America.

 

But, yeah, one thing I didn’t like about America was when I was in Manhattan in New York. I really do not like Manhattan at all! The buildings, there’s so many of them. They’re so tall and imposing. You feel like you’re in this kind of concrete cauldron, and there’s just so much, such a negative vibe. The whole place stinks of weed. There’s, kind of freakish looking people everywhere. There’s a lot of blacks, you know, particularly in a lot of public service jobs and so on. Like, public sector jobs and service jobs. And that’s a really kind of jarring experience. And there’s a lot of jews.

 

And so the whole energy of the place. The women are exceptionally slutty and the yeah, the whole energy of the place. Everyone’s very rude. Everyone’s very obnoxious. People are very inconsiderate. It’s not a good environment, I think when you squash so many people into one area, particularly with a whole lot of jews and non-Whites, it produces a very negative attitude. And homeless people produces a very kind of negative general attitude because you basically can’t give a fuck about all the people around you because you just can’t operate in society effectively being considerate to others because it’s such a dog-eat-dog environment. Such a obnoxious environment.

 

So you have to become obnoxious yourself in order to survive in that environment. And so, yeah, the place just has this very dark, unspirited energy. I really hated it. So that’s New York. America isn’t like that in general.

 

As I said, there’s other parts of America I went to. White picket fence, White flight suburbia, where everyone’s gorgeous! So it really depends where you go. But I think Americans are both the best and the worst of the White race in many respects.

 

But, Blair, you’ve never been to the US, have you? Never been overseas.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d be surprised if they let me in, because I’ve got, even though it’s a long time ago, it’s still a criminal record, which is pretty serious. And that, coupled with my politics, I think if I went there for a brief holiday, I could argue my rights to entry, but they could always, just on the whim of some border security bureaucrat, they could say:

 

“No, mate.”

 

And I kind of respect that about America, the fact they have, you know, strong principles against, or attitudes against criminals entering their country. But it’d be easy for me to get into a Commonwealth country, probably because I’m a Commonwealth citizen obviously.

 

But, yeah, never been to America. Never really had a strong desire to go. I’m not a travel around the world and see sights kind of person. I’m just happy at home usually. But if I had the opportunity, I wouldn’t waste it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I definitely am keen to go back to America. Hopefully I can get back in. And they let me back in. My girlfriend’s American, so that gives me a reason. I’ve got a lot of friends to go there as well. I want to go to America, and then when I get there, I’m going to get an AR 15 and I’m going to film myself shooting it into the air while throwing a Roman. And just enjoy my [words unclear]

 

Blair Cottrell: I was worried. I was worried what you’re about to say. I’m like, what the are you going to say? [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: I’m going to enjoy my First and Second Amendment rights, my ancient Anglo Saxon rights that still exist, at least somewhere.

 

Blair Cottrell: Somewhere I would actually like to go is like, to the Nordic countries. Like, just because I like the cold, and I want to see the mountains and the forests like, where would be a good place to go for that? Like Germany, Finland. Germany is not necessarily Nordic, but, you know what I mean, you’ve been to Sweden, we’ve spoken about Sweden before, but also Japan. Like, I wouldn’t mind seeing the mountains.

 

Joel Davis: Denmark as well.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, Denmark, right? Yeah.

 

[1:43:56]

 

Joel Davis: I thought Copenhagen was actually quite a nice city. The physiognomies, as well, were very familiar. I was like, I guess because that’s where the Anglos came from. Right? Denmark.

 

But, yeah, I was very surprised. I was like, the people kind of look Australian to me in a certain way in Denmark, but that was, that was a very pleasant place. I thought it was quite funny because the people are very kind of reserved and friendly, as most Scandinavians are.

 

But then when I went out drinking in Copenhagen of an evening, everyone gets fucking hammered! Like, it’s crazy! Like, [chuckling] they go hard. The inner Viking spirit comes out. I was like:

 

“There’s no Viking spirit here. Everyone is so sweet and pleasant. You know, where’s the Viking?”

 

And then you go out and then it gets to 11, 12 o’clock at night and you see the Viking come out. Everyone’s just absolutely sloshed! And there’s people keeled over, vomiting everywhere and passed out on trains.

 

And I thought that was kind of funny and endearing, actually. Yeah, but Scandinavian countries, very eugenic, a lot of good looking people, and they are very friendly and sweet. But I did find the Swedes, I like Swedes, but I did find the Swedes to be, they’re friendly, like, they’re very nice, but I don’t know, I find it hard to, like, connect with a lot of them because, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Is it because they don’t understand sarcasm?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, they don’t have, they don’t really banter like we do.

 

Whereas, like, when I was in England and Ireland, oh, I didn’t go to Ireland, but when I met Irish people in Europe or when I was in Britain or Scotland and I met people, you know, it was I had instant rapport, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, because that’s where we come from. That’s, like, genetic, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. And I felt like in, even though the people look like us in Scandinavia, they don’t have that aspect to their personality. Like, they’re very, you know, straight down the line, and I just found that a little bit I’m not gonna say uncomfortable. I wasn’t uncomfortable, but it’s just a little bit harder to connect with people when they don’t have that quality that we have. They’re almost, like, too nice. I don’t know how else to say it’s not a bad thing! You could say they’re more pure, maybe in a certain sense. It’s a noble thing. But you know, as an Anglo, I kind of like hearing, …

 

Blair Cottrell: People like, just, … There’s something about being an Australian where unless you’re actually hitting your friends with some hard truths and being a little bit abrasive with them, they don’t really trust you. If you’re too nice in Australia, it’s suspicious. You got to be a little bit harsh down here to be trusted and understood. Maybe it’s the criminal element in our stock. I don’t know what that is exactly, but it definitely comes from England, [chuckling] because the English are much the same.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but, I mean, like I said, I do like them as a people. Going there was a good experience because it made me care more, not that I didn’t care before, but made me care more about a little bit of insight. Care more about their politics and their people and so on, and keep an eye on I got to meet some activists when I was there in the Nordic Resistance Movement. They were very good people.

 

And, no, I’m grateful for that experience. I definitely kind of see, you know, after the Anglo-sphere the Nordic countries and the Germans and like, the Dutch and so on, I see them as they’re the most closest to us racially and culturally. And so I have a very big soft spot for all those countries and those people groups.

 

But, yeah, in terms of, there’s nothing really beats Australians to hang out with, because when you’re an Australian, that’s just who your people are. But so Australia itself, it’s a beautiful place, but it can be a little bit boring. But I just kind of I just wish there was Australians everywhere. Like, if there was an Australian pub in any foreign city, like, kind of like how there’s an Irish pub everywhere, which is, I guess, kind of close, but if there was an Australian pub in any of these, I’d be going straight there. And I really appreciate, when I got back after going to Europe for a year and I came back to Australia, I didn’t realise how much I appreciated Australian banter and friendship [chuckling] until I came back, because, yeah, no one really kind of gets me, like, Aussies.

 

So I think traveling only makes you appreciate home more in a lot of ways.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I’ve heard from a lot of my friends that you find Aussies when you’re overseas too. I think I’ve mentioned this before, like, even though you’re in England or somewhere in Europe, you can easily kind of hone in on your own accent. Like, you tend to find other Australian tourists really easily.

 

But I’ve got to go eat dinner soon. So did you want to go through the Superchats? Are you keen to fire off on that?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. There’s a few others here. Let’s have a look.

 

Blair Cottrell: I might just leave you to do them, man, because I’m super hungry and I’ve I’ve been pretty active, …

 

Joel Davis: Only a couple left because we read out a few other ones. It says here, I think this is from Cozy Clips:

 

“In 2010, a White liberal woman and Malcolm X scholar went to Haiti on a humanitarian work. She was raped and afterwards wrote an article blaming the White Patriarchy for it. No saving these women!”

 

Yeah, I remember reading that. And, yeah, obviously that’s a lost case. You know, it’s the point where like, a White Leftist, like, are they even White anymore? They’re basically they’ve become spiritual traitors and they’re so defective that they might as well not even consider them White, particularly someone that far gone.

 

Same reason why I wouldn’t consider a race mixer of White, or there’s really much point even being too concerned with homosexuals. I think either that are White because it’s like that’s just like a line of death. Like, there’s not perpetuation of the Aryan blood through that person. So they might as well be, like, black or brown as far as I’m concerned. Skinhead Friend said:

 

“Any thoughts on abortion being a eugenic necessary evil? Do we want the type of women who would even consider killing their babies to reproduce?”

 

If there’s an argument, do you want to answer that? Blair or, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I have a certain sympathy for people who, as you described earlier, homosexuals and in this case, women who are geared towards aborting their babies, because I think they’re a lot of the time victims of bad influence rather than inherently bad themselves. And so it actually makes me more vengeful against hostile subversive influence, which leads members of our race to make these decisions and do these things with their lives.

 

So that’s the way I look at it. It just reinforces what I discussed earlier in the stream, the necessity to inoculate our national community against this kind of influence that leads people to do these things or to behave in this manner.

 

So we’ve got to stop being so receptive to hostile ideas and understand what’s subversive, identify it, ban it, make it illegal, and jail people who are spreading it. You know it’s got to be that way for a while. I think, to actually reverse the damage that’s being done. It’s got to be like, literally full fascist dictatorship. This is the enemy, down with them sort of thing.

 

So until that becomes legal policy in Australia, you’re still going to get women going to abortion clinics for no real reason other than they want to travel or they just don’t feel like having a baby. You’re still going to get people turning gay and turning their children transgender with sterilisation, drugs, et cetera, et cetera, until the root cause of this issue is addressed, which actually isn’t the people themselves, but the way people are being influenced. Until that’s addressed, it’s going to continue.

 

Joel Davis: Well, the argument, the woke eugenic argument is that it actually, the fault is actually in the people, that some people have a resistance to the current culture. Like, they can exist, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t think, … I understand the argument. I just don’t think enough people have the resistance. People need to be protected. That’s the point.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think there’s a certain balance between these two tendencies, like a happy medium.

 

But I think the eugenics side of the argument does make, has some points in its favour. Like, for instance, women who get abortions, they are more likely to have narcissistic traits and other kind of psychological illnesses that would predispose them to being worse mothers.

 

So that you have a woman who’s, like, a total piece of shit and she kills her baby because she’s a piece of shit, it’s like, okay, like, that’s obviously an immoral thing and heinous thing, but it’s almost like, well, what are the genes that are going to be going into that baby? And what kind of nurturing environment are they going to be raised in if the baby’s kept alive? Like, is that baby just going to now be some defective? Like, if we keep that baby alive, are they going to be raised properly? Are they going to have good genes? Are they going to end up becoming a good functional member of the race? I mean, that’s an open question.

 

So I think the eugenicists have, like, points in their favour, but then at the same time. Yeah. I don’t think you can just allow these ideas to run rampant in your society. You know, some people, just because people are conformists, it doesn’t mean that that’s bad. Like, in a society, a lot of people are predisposed to conformity because for most of history, society wasn’t run by our racial enemies and wasn’t run by totally insane freaks like it is now. And so under those conditions, respecting authority and just conforming to the society around you and just going along with the culture would have been mostly good because we had a mostly good and healthy culture. And so those people are kind of victims of this larger process.

 

As I said earlier, talking about democracy, a lot of people aren’t cut out for thinking about politics in a very abstract way and thinking about the collective well being of the race or the nation in a very kind of Zoomed out way. They’re kind of optimized for just they’re kind of interpersonal relationships. And so a lot of those people aren’t necessarily, like, defective. They’re just kind of victims of a lack of good leadership.

 

So this points in Blair’s favour as well. I think you have to kind of balance both of these considerations, as I said.

 

But I think that’s basically it for the Superchats. So we’ll end the stream there. I hope you guys enjoyed the show this weekend. We’ll be back next week as always. And yeah, thanks, everyone who sent Superchats. Appreciate you supporting the show, and we’ll catch you all next week.

 

And also, if you’re watching on Rumble, I noticed we get way more views than their subscribers. I think that’s because a lot of people haven’t made Rumble accounts. They just kind of watch the stream sj make a Rumble account! Subscribe, like the streams! It helps boost them in the algorithm.

 

And then you can also leave comments. Yeah, just make a Rumble account.

 

And anyway, I also want to say, actually, as well, clip the show, post it on Twitter and post it on TikTok. I got to keep saying it because I want to keep reinforcing it. You got a spare bit of time, you’ve got a Twitter account, or you can make a TikTok account, make some choice clips of the show where you think there’s a couple minutes where one of us was cooking on something and it was a good clip and go spread it around. That’s how the show, one of the main ways we get new viewers to the show or the show grows, our influence grows.

 

So it’s kind of up to you, the audience, to help extend the influence of the show. There isn’t really much else like this in Australia. What we do, offering the perspective that we offer, that gets any, at least nothing that really gets much views or gets much attention. So help spread the show. We’re under so much censorship, we’ve been banned off YouTube. Now between Blair and I’ve got three YouTube channels banned. You know, obviously, Blair and Tom are banned from Twitter. Yeah, we’re fighting an uphill battle. We kind of can’t think about going on something like Facebook or Instagram. We just instantly get wiped out. I know Blair and Tom got wiped out from Facebook back in the day when that was still more of a relevant platform.

 

So the way in which we can get around censorship is by having a group effort to push our clips and push our influence around the censors. They can’t ban everyone. They can ban the key central nodes in the system, but they can’t ban all of you guys. So some of you get banned, but they can’t ban everyone at once.

 

So that’s a key strategic adaptation we have to make to make sure that our propaganda keeps spreading and promulgating online despite the censorship. So help out, participate, be an active node that advances.

 

And also, when you see other people do this, give them a, like, give them a retweet. Like I’ve been showing this guy, he made a Twitter account recently, it’s quite good, called the White Australia Policy. Go follow the White Australia Policy on Twitter. Great Twitter account. He clips the show and there’s a few other guys that clip the show.

 

And if you clip the show, like, send it to me if you want, like. And I can spread it around a little bit. Don’t just put a clip up. You got a Twitter account with 50 followers or something, and you put a clip up and it gets almost no views. You know, you got to post it in the replies, post it in the replies of my tweets, post it in the replies of other, you know, anti-immigration accounts or Australian nationalist accounts on Twitter, or even in the replies of our political enemies if it’s making some counterpoint to what they’re saying. Yeah, just get it out there!

 

[1:58:20]

 

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/30/2024 = 53)

Seppl88
5 hours ago
Altruism for racial outsiders is contributing to our demise. Race should be above all. You guys are on the right page.
0 likes

Seppl88
5 hours ago
Women in general lack an understanding of social realities and are prone to WOKEness. Giving women education past high school is detrimental to our race.
0 likes

MiamiBadGuy
15 hours ago
Trump is not “inevitable.”
0 likes

theunbeholden
21 hours ago
What organisation is Blair behind? I remember some group being mentioned before but I can’t remember it right now.
0 likes

masklophobix
1 day ago
God is beautiful so in their rebellion against God they must destroy anything that is beautiful, including themselves. Atheism has destroyed us.
1 like

blobgnarley
1 day ago
Joel looks like the Anglo bin Laden with that beard
1 like

Sceptaginoth
1 day ago
Theres no such thing as an aura you hippy
1 like

Sceptaginoth
1 day ago
channel the sol brah
0 likes

GovMarioPalmieri
2 days ago
I like the asocial tendencies of Swedes.
0 likes

Irishman2023
2 days ago
I think you have hit the nail on the head with the spatial awareness thing. Also with the dumbing down of society. Subscribed! Good work guys.
0 likes

FreedomFighter8888888888
2 days ago
Hertchfield in Berlin, a jew is the father of transgenderism, Elon is saying he wants to destroy the woke mind virus, wokeism is jewish. He needs to destroy the leftist jews who killed his son.
1 like

› Show 1 reply
Vicki88888888
2 days ago
Rumble is using BS algorithms to censor certain words like the N word. Arabs and N have F all respect especially towards WHITE WOMEN.
-1 likes

ADC789
2 days ago
Joel is getting more than 10k views
on Rumble. That means he is getting watched by more Aussies than the Olympic in fucking Paris.
0 likes

Sinagoglies
3 days ago
It was religious war between the British JudeoMasonic govt and Catholic Ireland. England genocided almost half of Ireland – forced starvation exporting food sources etc calling it a potato famine. The Eureka Stockade was quite international but dominated by the Irish and the leader was Peter Lalor – an Irish Catholic. Some even called it an Irish rebellion. I know Joel has tried to claim it as purely Anglo recently. Britain a Masonic Protestant wealth cult built to support the “jews spreading liberalism, faggotry and heathenry. You guys are looking more like anti Western civilisation Marxists quoting all these skanky modernists that J$ws promote! Joel even recently backed Jew Karl Marx’s justification of stealing land from Catholic Mexico. Hatred of mankind and self worship of race is a Jewish trait. Hitler did not hate mankind. Japan and Palestine were with the AXIS. You’re all pretty sloppy with historical facts – making it up as you go along. TWO FACED NAPOLEON EMANCIPATED THE JEWS! https://rumble.com/v58df44-when-will-enough-be-enough.html Jews love pagans! https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/barbarians Some Eureka historians have suggested that as well as most of the miners inside the stockade, in the area where the defensive position was established, the miners were overwhelmingly Irish. Even the password used at the Eureka Stockade – Vinegar Hill – was the scene of an 1804 Irish convict uprising in New South Wales.[6] http://www.eurekapedia.org/Ireland https://www.nma.gov.au/defining-moments/resources/castle-hill-rebellion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Eureka_Stockade_defenders A Great Mini Series on Australian convict history including the ship journey based on historical facts. It is very hard to find but I found one site that sold the DVD. Against The Wind TV series 1978 – Irish Rebellion (Vinegar Hill) Australia 1804 – Philip Cunningham’s pledge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-c90s1IlDw
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Sinagoglies
3 days ago
Irish Catholic Archbishop of Melbourne, Daniel Mannix was anti conscription (as were most Catholics as opposed to Protestants) waking up Aussies as he knew WW1 was a trade war / banker war. “During October 1916, he exploded onto the political stage in Australia, when prime minister William M Hughes tried to introduce conscription by a national plebiscite. Mannix opposed compulsory military service. “I hope and believe that the peace can be secured without conscription in Australia. For conscription is a hateful thing, and almost certain to bring evil in its train,” he said.” “England was the “greatest hypocrite in the world,” he charged. “Ireland has the same grievance against England which the American revolutionaries had, only ten times greater,” he told his summer school audience. “England was your enemy, is your enemy and shall be your enemy for all time.” https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/specialreports/archbishop-daniel-j-mannix-cork-born-cleric-drew-attention-to-irish-situation-943244.html Archbishop Mannix – a tribal icon, controversial prelate? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTt5sYxBbBw There was a Catholic movement in Australia which infiltrated the unions controlled by Communists in the 40’s and 50’s B.A. Santamaria and The Movement https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMceNPNZLZk
0 likes

Sinagoglies
3 days ago
Adolf Hitler’s Christian Germany: The Twelve Year Christendom https://www.bitchute.com/video/17SjPY3Z5RDo The history of the yellow star Although this public branding of the Jews is associated with Hitler’s Germany, it predated the Holocaust by centuries. In Europe, it first appeared in 1215, when the Fourth Congress of the Lateran introduced an easily distinguishable dress code for all Jews and Muslims. This took the form of a special head covering, such as a pointy hat, or a garb in the form of pieces of fabric attached to clothes. The aim was to force Jews to convert to Christianity, and the dress law persisted in some places until the eighteenth century. Only the age of the Enlightenment and the spread of liberalism led to the fall of the medieval ghettos, and the Jews to receive equality. https://www.abc.net.au/religion/covid-yellow-star-and-history-of-jewish-persecution/13539606 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Pius_VII#Reinstitution_of_Jewish_Ghetto Reinstitution of Jewish Ghetto[edit] Under Napoleonic rule, the Jewish Roman Ghetto had been abolished and Jews were free to live and move where they would. Following the restoration of Papal rule, Pius VII re-instituted the confinement of Jews to the Ghetto, having the doors closed at nighttime.[14] Pius VII issued an encyclical “Diu satis” in order to advocate a return to the values of the Gospel and universalized the feast of Our Lady of Sorrows for 15 September. He condemned Freemasonry and the movement of the Carbonari in the encyclical Ecclesiam a Jesu Christo in 1821. Pius VII asserted that Freemasons must be excommunicated and it linked them with the Carbonari, an anti-clerical revolutionary group in Italy. All members of the Carbonari were also excommunicated. Pius VII was multilingual and had the ability to speak Italian, French, English and Latin. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cum_nimis_absurdum
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
katana17
3 days ago
Transcript of the video is here: [Joel Davis – When Will Enough Be Enough? – Jul 25, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/07/26/joel-davis-when-will-enough-be-enough-jul-25-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss the following: – The Australian woman gang-raped by five Africans in Paris. – Criticize the lack of response from bystanders in the kebab shop. – Discuss the dangers of naive travel and the “wanderlust” mentality. – Blame boomer parents for encouraging unrealistic travel expectations. – They discuss Elon Musk’s revelation about his son becoming transgender. – They criticize the role of Musk’s ex-wife in the situation. – Express skepticism about transgenderism and its origins. – They discuss Elon Musk’s pro-Israel stance and its implications. – Genetic mutations and their potential link to leftist beliefs. – The importance of choosing a mentally healthy partner for reproduction. – Young nationalists marching in Vienna, Austria. – They compare political climates in different European countries. – The conversation shifts to Australian politics and culture. – The challenges of engaging Australians in politics. – Share their experiences and impressions of traveling to the United States. – The differences between various parts of America. – Their experiences in Scandinavian countries. – Cultural differences between Australians and Scandinavians. – Express appreciation for Australian culture and banter. – The concept of abortion as a potential eugenic tool. – Debate the balance between genetic predisposition and environmental influence. – The need to protect people from harmful cultural influences. – The challenges of conformity in society. – The importance of good leadership in shaping societal values. – Encourage viewers to engage with and share their content. – The challenges of censorship on various platforms. – Strategies for spreading their message despite censorship. ….
0 likes

Delete
GhostDogMan
Supporter
3 days ago
Good Show. Thank you for highlighting the BS of 5 wretched Subsaharans defiling a lively Aussie Lass. Enraging! If this was a Palestinian vs. Israel attack, Israel would have deported or obliterated 50 Africans for revenge. We need to stop their Supremacy
0 likes

PeroErcegovac
3 days ago
You are a racially aware. So are they. Why would they assist an Australian woman? To be honest I am surprised that someone took a swing at the black. On revenge? Yes. But only when one cannot be caught. Hence the Italian saying “revenge is a meal best served cold”. Always be careful when taking revenge, take it, but be very careful.
1 like

BradC1988
3 days ago
If there were no niggys running loose in Paris, that Aussie woman would never have been raped. We need mass deportations now!
1 like

ihatebolshevikscum
3 days ago
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡀⢐⡂⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⣤⣤⣴⣶⣾⣿⣟⣭⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣛⠲⣤⣤⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠷⢋⣉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣅⠛⣿⣿⣷⣦⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⠉⣭⣤⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣜⡛⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣭⡴⢶⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣤⢙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣠⢶⣶⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣌⠻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢋⣡⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠷⣆⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣏⠠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⢉⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⡷⠌⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠌⠙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⡘⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣀⠺⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⣃⣤⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠶⣌⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⣿⣿⡿⠿⡿⠿⣿⣿⣿⡆⢸⣿⣿⡿⣛⣉⣉⣙⣿⣟⣛⣻⣿⣿⣿⡆⣽⣯⣥⣴⣶⣶⣾⣝⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣶⣶⣦⣽⣧⣬⣭⣬⣾⣿⠏⠉⠉⠛⠛⠻⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⡜⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡋⠑⢦⣍⣋⣙⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⢶⣿⣿⣿⠟⣩⡿⠛⠉⠉⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⢳⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⣿⣿⣿⣮⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣽⣿⣿⣷⡌⢿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠀⠀⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⣠⣶⡿⠗⠺⣿⡏⢾⣿⣿⠃⣼⡏⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⢿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⣿⣿⣿⣷⣬⣝⡛⠛⠿⠿⠿⠛⣛⣛⣭⣴⠎⣿⣿⡿⠁⠀⣰⣿⣿⡄⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⣿⣿⣷⣶⣤⣼⣷⢸⣿⠃⢸⣿⠁⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄⠹⣦⣤⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣥⣾⡿⠋⠀⠀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣷⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠘⣿⡀⢸⡿⠀⠀⠀⢠⣿⣿⠋⣠⡶⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠛⠛⠛⠛⠛⠉⠉⢛⡟⠋⠀⠀⣠⡞⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀⠀ ⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⣿⣿⣤⣿⣿⣾⣷⣤⣤⣶⣿⣿⠇⣸⠏⠀⠀⠙⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⢠⣶⣿⣿⣿⠋⠀⣀⣴⡾⠿⣿⣄⠙⣻⢿⣿⠀⡀ ⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⣿⡋⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⢠⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣦⣬⡀⢻⣶⣾⣄⣏ ⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⣿⣧⠀⢻⣿⣿⠟⣩⣿⣿⣿⡇⣼⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⣿⣿⣿⡿⠟⠛⠛⠛⠉⠻⠿⣿⣧⣤⣄⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⠇⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⢠⣿⣿⡯⣏ ⠀⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⡀⠛⠋⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣿⣤⣴⣿⣿⣶⣤⣴⣿⣿⠟⣡⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣶⠀⣸⣿⣿⣷⣄⣿⣿⡿⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀⣿⣿⣿⡿⣯ ⠀⠙⣟⣅⠘⣿⡛⠻⣿⣿⣷⡄⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⢿⣿⡿⠀⢀ ⣴⣿⣿⣿⣧⠙⢿⣦⣄⡙⠻⠿⣆⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠉⣉⣉⣉⣁⣀⣀⠐⣾⣶⣶⣿⡄⠀⠀ ⠘⣿⣿⣿⣿⡧⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⡀⢸⣿⡟⠛⣟⠻⣿⣛⠻⢟⠻⠿⢟⣛⡟⢉⣉⣉⢱⣲⡯⣴⣶⡟⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠘⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⣄ ⠀⢻⣿⣿⣿⠇⣿⣿⣿⠿⢿⣿⣿⣧⢠⡇⣿⡔⣿⣗⣿⣿⢶⣿⣿⡷⣿⣿⣿⣾⣿⣿⢸⣿⠇⠟⣛⣅⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠆⠙⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀ ⠀⢸⣿⣟⣫⡄⠨⣥⣴⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⢨⡇⣹⡁⣛⡏⠻⠛⠛⣿⣛⠃⢛⣻⣏⣨⣭⣥⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠈⣷⣌⠻⣿⡏⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠛⣫⣤⣶⣦⡀⠉⠉⠉⢛⣿⣿⠚⣇⣿⡇⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⢿⣿⡿⢺⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢸⣿⠇⢛⣩⣡⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠋⠀⠈⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⢋⣤⣤⣄⡈⢻⣷⣌⠃⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⢰⣿⡿⠋⠁⠀⢹⣾⣧⣌⣛⣘⣛⣃⣘⣛⣃⣘⣛⣫⣬⣭⣥⣴⣶⣿⣟⣵⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠛⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢿⣿⣿⡇⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⡿⠿⠟⠛⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠛⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⣿⣧⡘⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠘⠛⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
1 like

› Show 1 reply
kalamazoogroyper
3 days ago
Really great ep boys – love the discussion around the psychology driving political thought and loyalty – also as an Aussie with an American wife I like hearing Joels take on the States and Americans
1 like

Motown88
Supporter
4 days ago
I like the street reporter vibe…
1 like

jamerry1982
4 days ago
Wandering,alone,at 3am,in a foreign country where dozens of similar incidents have occurred in the recent past,but,hey,that’s racist and racism’s much worse than a bunch of dudes raping a lone woman,this is beyond a fucking joke that the liberal media will suppress these stories because,y’know,diversity an that yeah,fucks sake.
2 likes

Sinagoglies
4 days ago
The natural order is hierarchical. Not egalitarian. “Equality” doesn’t exist in nature. http://www.catholiceducation.org/en/culture/art/20-ways-the-lord-of-the-rings-is-both-christian-and-catholic.html The Men Who Caused the French Revolution 1789 http://www.lovethetruth.com/books/pawns/03.htm In the previous chapter evidence was given to prove how a small group of foreign money-lenders, operating through their English agents, remained anonymous while they secured control of that nation’s economy for the modest sum of £1,250,000. Evidence will now be produced to identify some of these International Jewish money-lenders and prove they, or their successors, plotted and planned, and helped finance, the Great French Revolution of 1789, exactly the same way as they had plotted and planned and financed the English Revolution of 1640-1649. In succeeding chapters evidence will be produced to prove that the descendants of these same International Jewish Financiers have been The Secret Power behind every war and revolution from 1789 onwards. Cont… French Revolution = emancipation of J$ws giving equal status to Catholics – a disaster for Europe and the world! https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ajs-review/article/abs/french-revolution-and-the-jews-assessing-the-cultural-impact/6393D65C0AC8AFDE2320075927B15955 The Judeo-Masonic roots of the US founding fathers and the Constitution Freemasonry, hatched in the British Empire following the Enlightenment-Rosicrucian revolutionary overthrow of the Catholic Church in England, is the proxy arm of the international Jewish conspiracy against Christ and His Saints. Throughout the centuries, the Jewish conspirators have struggled to refrain from publicly gloating of their engineering of this proxy movement. Cont…
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
Sinagoglies
4 days ago
Jews have entirely created Masonry to corrupt the nations of Christian civilization and to propagate behind this veil the general revolution which is to bring about the domination of Israel. It is simply a tool and a means in the hands of the Jews. In support of this, we can quote the article of Dr. Isaac M. Wise published in the Israelite of America, 3 August, 1866: ‘Masonry is a Jewish institution, whose history, degrees, charges, passwords, and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end.’[I] This conspiracy to “corrupt the nations” was executed under the cover of “Enlightenment” progress and freedom. The Masonic Illuminati slogan is “liberty, fraternity, and equality”, which was shouted from rooftops as revolutionaries raped, pillaged, and murdered their way through France. https://fitzinfo.net/2014/02/26/alex-jones-freemasonry-and-the-cult-of-constitution/
0 likes

Joshua1000
4 days ago
W stream
0 likes

Sinagoglies
4 days ago
Jews were banned from England in 1290 and not allowed back until Oliver Cromwell lifted the ban in 1656. The Rothschild British Empire: Roman Catholic Guy Fawkes The Start Of The Warnings! Father Of Anonymous! How did England deal with a corrupt puritan government/parliament? http://politicalvelcraft.org/anonymous/ ISLAM AND JudeoMasonic PROTESTANT COLLABORATIONS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestantism_and_Islam Judaizers: https://slife.org/protestantism-and-islam/ Why The Crusades Were Awesome https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aFkoX6g1fE http://self.gutenberg.org/articles/Islam_and_Protestantism HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Following the Turkish conquest of Constantinople in 1453 by Mehmet II and the unification of the Middle Eastunder Selim I, Suleiman the Magnificent, the son of Selim, managed to expand Ottoman rule to Balkans. The Habsburg Empire thus entered into direct conflict with the Ottomans. At the same time the Protestant Reformation was taking place in numerous areas of northern and central Europe, in harsh opposition to Papal authority and the Holy Roman Empire led by Emperor Charles V. This situation led the Protestants to consider various forms of cooperation and rapprochement (religious, commercial, military) with the Muslim world, in opposition to their common Habsburg enemy. EARLY RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATION (15TH–17TH CENTURIES) During the development of the Reformation, Protestantism and Islam were considered closer to each other than they were to Catholicism: “Islam was seen as closer to Protestantism in banning images from places of worship, in not treating marriage as a sacrament and in rejecting monastic orders”.[1] Relief statues in the Cathedral of Saint Martin, Utrecht, attacked in Reformation iconoclasm in the 16th century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_Revolt#/media/File:UtrechtIconoclasm.jpg
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Sinagoglies
4 days ago
Anglo-Turkish piracy Main article: Anglo-Turkish piracy After peace was made with Catholic Spain in 1604, English pirates nevertheless continued to raid Christian shipping in the Mediterranean, this time under the protection of the Muslim rulers of the Barbary States, and often converting to Islam in the process, in what has been described as Anglo-Turkish piracy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turco-Calvinism ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestantism_and_Islam “As part of a propaganda campaign including prints, pamphlets and much else, many Geuzen medals were created as badges of affiliation, using a wide range of symbolism, including that associated with the Ottoman Empire. William I of Orange sought Ottoman assistance against the Spanish king Philip II.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geuzen ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestantism_and_Islam “From 1608, Samuel Pallache served as an intermediary to discuss an alliance between Morocco and the Low Countries. In 1613, the Moroccan Ambassador Al-Hajari discussed in La Hague with the Dutch Prince Maurice of Orange the possibility of an alliance between the Dutch Republic, the Ottoman Empire, Morocco and the Moriscos, against the common enemy Spain.[40] His book mentions the discussion for a combined offensive on Spain,[41] as well as the religious reasons for the good relations between Islam and Protestantism at the time: Their teachers [Luther and Calvin] warned them [Protestants] against the Pope and the worshippers of Idols; they also told them not to hate the Muslims because they are the sword of God in the world against the idol-worshippers. That is why they side with the Muslims. — Al-Hajari, The Book of the Protector of Religion against the Unbeliever” During the Thirty Years War (1618–1648), the Dutch would strengthen contacts with the Moriscos against Spain.[43] In the 17th century Protestant communities again asked for Ottoman help against the Habsburg Catholics.
0 likes

ProvingNihil
4 days ago
The only thing good about having the internet as kid nowadays, it’s a easier way to extra money, and build internet friendship’s that could turn into real life friendship’s. I do miss going outside riding my bike around town, not caring about a single thing. Being an adult is tough, but there’s absolutely nothing I can do about it. Also what happened with that Australian woman is utterly disgusting, it pisses me off that no one stepped in to help her. That shouldn’t have happened, it’s a real shame that European countries are being graped by these colored scumbags, hell look at their country for example it’s usually a cesspool.
0 likes

ADC789
4 days ago
You think you know Peak Feminism, check this one out. I have a client in her late 40s never married had IVF kid and she has put the kid on heavy antibiotics to kill down his microbiome so his shit doesn’t smell like mens shit is meant to. This boy is going to go through puberty soon, what chance is he?
-1 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Sinagoglies
4 days ago
IVF is extremely evil.
1 like

ProvingNihil
4 days ago
Blairs dropping those big fact BOMBS! 100% agree with you man, I was born in 1990. I remember the day’s as child going outside being a kid, where internet didn’t take over my life, and where it wasn’t a concern. These kid’s nowadays have no idea how bad they have it, man what a great conversation to bring up Blair.
6 likes

MelancholyMonkey
4 days ago
Great stream, as usual. You guys never disappoint. Warm greetings from America!
3 likes

Lueger
4 days ago
1:26:30 Austria, like Germany, was occupied by the bolshevik and Anglo-American agents of international jewry after WWII, but was able to get the occupants to leave in 1955 by pledging never to unify with Germany (irrespective of the democratic will of the population), to be neutral, and to limit their military to only self-defense forces.
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
Sinagoglies
3 days ago
“When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them, after suitable buildups, as fascist or Nazi or anti-Semitic, and use the prestige of antifascist and tolerance organizations to discredit them.” (Communist Party Directive, 1943) Austria defending against Commies/Liberals/globalists/Demoncrazy in 1934 𝐃𝐢𝐞 𝐕𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐥ä𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐭 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ip9iLTjogB8
0 likes

Metalhead86
4 days ago
problem with a lot of women is they bought into this naive notion that they shouldn’t be racist and ignore their instincts, just buying into the bullshit. African rape monkeys and towel head dune coons are out in the streets at 3:00 a.m. in every major city.
10 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Motown88
Supporter
4 days ago
You’d think all those Astronauts & Engineers, Doctors and Scientists would be home in bed at 3am, having a big day at work in the morning and all…
4 likes

Lueger
4 days ago
52:45 HJ ransacked the Institut fuer Sexualwissenschaft (Magnus Hirschfeld) and burned the library in front of the library of the University of Berlin (now the Humboldt Universitaet zu Berlin) along with other jew-communist degenerate “literature.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_Hirschfeld Apparently Hirschfeld was a sodomite himself.
5 likes

ballsagna
4 days ago
I was in France in 2012 and it was gorgeous, including Paris – granted I only went to Paris for 2 days and a night (mostly stayed with friends in Lyon / Nice / St Tropez).. & steered clear of all nonwhites. I wouldn’t go back now. My son has been intrigued by Italy since age 2 after seeing a mural at a local restaurant. I always wanted to take him there but after seeing the recent Africanization… I’m wary. These scum are stealing our history and our civilization.
14 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Carnierge
Supporter
3 days ago
The Italian police are more hardcore in dealing with the problem than other continental European nations. But you could still come across the wrong deranged Ugandan at the wrong time and have a very bad day. Overall Italy is still better than France in this regard, for now.
2 likes

vigilantejustice23
4 days ago
I think most women who go along with the tranny stuff for their kids are engaged in pathological altruism. Fathers are more likely to give their kids tough love and tell them something they don’t want to (but need to) hear. Fathers promote discipline. Mothers can be so empathetic that they end up enabling bad behavior (some even are manipulated by their own children.) of course this empathy is necessary for children, but it can be twisted for nefarious purposes. For example – these mothers are told that if they don’t let their kids “transition” they will fall into a deep depression and commit suicide, and it’ll be all their fault. Many of these kids are already engaging in self-harm like cutting, so their mothers are desperate for any fast solution. It’s a very evil way of corrupting a healthy maternal instinct. Most men oppose the tranny stuff not only because they aren’t as easily manipulated, but also because they’re put off by the lack of masculinity/faggotry. Women are generally less contemptuous of weak/feminine men in a SOCIAL context than men are (i.e. they certainly don’t want to sleep with weak men, but they also don’t want to beat them up) Anyway, the point is that I don’t think it’s a mothers “death instinct” generally motivating this stuff – there’s no logical reason to believe white mothers would evolve to develop a “death instinct” although the point made about the biological trash taking itself out is definitely interesting
7 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Motown88
Supporter
4 days ago
Public perception of single motherhood has been manipulated to go from shameful to preferrable, slut shaming & fat shaming will get you fired or even wind up in court while race mixing is promoted. And you just nailed all the reasons it is so – to get White Men out of the home.
0 likes

Nickdorshimer
4 days ago
fire
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
ADC789
2 days ago

0 likes

AvidFan
4 days ago
“Davis” is English. “Davies” is Welsh.
3 likes

katana17
4 days ago
Last week’s show. [Joel Davis – Trump Inevitable, Blair Censored, Paedo Freaks Destroyed – Jul 19, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/07/20/joel-davis-trump-inevitable-blair-censored-paedo-freaks-destroyed-jul-19-2024-transcript/
1 like

Delete
BillCarney
4 days ago
Thanks.
2 likes

BREPERR
4 days ago
Never underestimate the govts ability to mind control populations. Women are mentally warped and so are leftist men. That’s what’s driving them agaisnt maternal instinct. Look at birth control and how it makes women go towards more effeminate men who have lower testosterone, and when they get off the pill they are no longer attracted to their bf
15 likes

BREPERR
4 days ago
Please add link or screenshot of Australian official organization warning athletes to not wear national colors in Europe so we can share across social media
9 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
theunbeholden
21 hours ago
Also check out Gtvflyers.
0 likes

 

 

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Mark Collett: Hello everybody, and welcome to Patriotic Weekly Review, episode number 251! And we are here tonight live on Odysee, Dlive and Rumble. So with us being on so many platforms, if there’s one platform that stops working, you can jump on board with another.

 

Now, I say this at the beginning of every show, so please do give this a like and a share. If you’re on a platform that you can like it, and obviously you’re somewhere where you can share it.

 

So please do spread the word. Tell people what’s happening. We and myself, Patriotic Alternative and myself, we are the most deplatformed organisation, and I am the most deplatformed person in the whole of the UK! No one has lost as many bank accounts as me. Nobody has had the censorship that I have had. Nobody other than myself is banned from every single social network, including Twitter [X].

 

So please do help us spread the message.

 

Now, if you want to contribute to tonight’s stream, you can do. Please consider making a small donation, $3, $5, $10 or whatever you can afford. If you’re one of those newly minted Bitcoin millionaires, share some of your crypto wealth with us tonight because it’s going to be a very good show.

 

Now, everything that I do, all of my shows, my book, all of my pre-recorded videos, everything is available free of charge. Nothing has ever gone behind a paywall. Even my book is available to download for free from www.thefallofwesternman.com.

 

So if you like my work, and if you want to keep it churning out at the regularity that it does with at least five shows every week, then please do contribute something to tonight’s show. And any contribution with a message attached will be read out in the second half of tonight’s stream.

 

So thank you in advance for that.

 

Now, if you don’t want to give a Superchat but you want to give crypto-currencies, all of the crypto links are in the description below, and that includes Rumble, Odysee and the replay on DLive.

 

And finally, if you want to write to me, you can write to me at mark@thefallofwesternman.com if you want to contribute via other means, or if you want to work with me in the future, if you’ve got any questions to ask me, that is the place to do it.

 

Now, I have got a few things coming up later in the week. On Thursday. Thursday, no, nothing. And I’ve got nothing on Thursday. On Friday, I am live with Dr. David Duke 04:00 pm UK time on Friday evening I’m live at 07:00 pm for the PA monthly update.

 

Remember, this Friday, Sam Melia is being sentenced at Leeds Crown Court. He is likely to get a custodial sentence. I am going to be there with him on Friday, showing him some support, and we’ll report on that to you, myself and Laura on Friday night.

 

[03:14]

 

And on Sunday night, 07:00 pm it’s the Nationalist A-Team. So plenty of good shows coming up, so please do keep your eyes peeled for that. And I’ve already booked in four different people for the month of April for PWR, and they are all huge hitters, so there’s a lot to look forward to, including a new guest, Raging Dissident. Really looking forward to that one.

 

Anyway, let’s get into tonight’s show. Tonight we have the indomitable Joe Marsh! Joe Marsh is a good friend of mine. I’ve known him for years. I work closely with him, with PA. He’s our Welsh Regional Organiser. Joe is a guy that they just can’t keep down.

 

Like me, he has faced unprecedented political repression, yet he always bounces back. He is what we call a “super activist”. He is a man that never, ever stops! He’s always busy every weekend doing something positive to spread our message to the public. He appears on a number of different streams, and he is someone that you can always rely on. He’s never down in the dumps. He’s always happy, and he’s always pleased to be spreading the good word.

 

How are you doing tonight, Joe?

 

Joe Marsh: I’m okay. How’s it going?

 

Mark Collett: I am very well. I’m in a very good mood today. What have you been up to since we last spoke? I think we did a stream before Christmas and I said:

 

“It’s going to be soon before we get you back on.”

 

And it’s already the end of February.

 

So what have you been up to?

 

Joe Marsh: Yeah, well, I’ve been to a few demos. I went to Drag Queen Story Hour protest in Swindon. I went to one in Swansea. I went to Cannock last week as well, with PA. There was a big farmers demo today in Cardiff. It was massive! But I couldn’t go to it because I had to work. But a few of our activists have been down there. One of them has made a little video. I put a few little videos online earlier that people sent me.

 

Yeah, so we’re all always around. I’ve been reporting on some of the hotels in Cardiff and that. Like, if I’m not working, I’m doing activism. That’s what I do like. That’s my hobby.

 

Mark Collett: And it’s a good hobby to have! It’s something that I certainly endorse. And you’re always busy. But you mentioned the farmers today. That’s been a big issue all over the West at the moment, especially in European countries.

 

The fact that they seem to be trying, the powers that be, seem to be trying to force all farmers out of business, which seems insane because without farmers you have no food. And I don’t know what they’re even thinking of with those kind of policies. But there does seem to be a concerted pushback.

 

Now, we’ve seen these big pushbacks in places like Holland and France, but it’s now come here to the UK. What do you think about these farmers protests and what kind of reception have they received?

 

[06:09]

 

Joe Marsh: Right, well, it’s early days down here. Our farmers are not quite as militant as they are in Europe. A lot of them, countries like Poland and Italy and the Netherlands, they’ve just gone mental and they’re just not having it! And they’re on the streets all the time now.

 

The Welsh farmers, they’re fuming about it, but they’ve been terrified to start doing things because they want the public support and they don’t want to alienate the public.

 

So it’s been slow to start off. I know in England, they’ve done some protests down in Dover, but they didn’t really cause disruption. They just sort of turned up as if to say:

 

“This is what we could do!”

 

You know what I mean?

 

But this is a world-wide thing. All over the world, they’re trying to destroy the farmers. And I think it’s because they want to control the food supply, because if you control the food, you control the people. It’s been done in the past and we know that’s turned out. And we just can’t sit back and allow it to happen.

 

On this island that we live on, we should be self sufficient. And they’ve been making it hard for the farmers for years now.

 

But with this Agenda 2030 and all the rest of it, they’re just going for it now, completely trying to destroy them. I was going to say it’s not there anymore, but on the actual government’s website a while ago, I saw they were saying:

 

“If you’re a farmer and you no longer wish to do that, we will buy you out.”

 

But obviously they’re not buying them out to take over their farm, they’re just buying them out to get rid of them.

 

Mark Collett: So I’ve got to ask you a question then, Joe. You’ve been around a long time. If the farmers aren’t growing food, and we know what the farmland will be used for, to be used to build new build houses for White people fleeing cities so that we can make room for more migrants. But if the farmers aren’t growing food, where are we going to be getting our food from?

 

Because for a long time, Britain’s population has been growing and it’s growing more rapidly than ever at the moment. And all that growth is driven by mass immigration. As we know, the birth rates in Britain now are about, I think, 1.44, which means we’ve got a collapsing population. But the population is actually growing, which means this is all down to mass immigration.

 

Now, obviously, we are now at a position where I don’t think we could feed our own people anyway, because there’s just too many people in the UK. It’s a very small country with a population that they admit of about 67 million.

 

And I think when you add illegals and others there, it’s probably going to be really about 70 million. I’d say it was 70 million, but how are they going to feed everyone? And what do you think the game plan is? If the farmers are out of business, what do you think the plan is in order to feed this growing population?

 

[09:14]

 

Joe Marsh: Right, well, a lot of this agenda, it started out being called Agenda 21. They’ve changed it to 2030 now.

 

But a lot of the stuff that was there, … In the lockdown, I just sat and read and read and read loads of stuff from the World Economic Forum’s websites. And Bill Gates, I know he’s only like a fall guy. He’s a face they put up, right? He’s nowhere near the top of the chain. But he’s been buying all these factories in Argentina and places like that, and they’re making fake meat, which is like GM modified meat. They’re making fake eggs and fake milk! And God knows what else fake food they’re making.

 

I just think that they want to decimate the farmers, get rid of them on the basis of its for the climate, and then we’ll just be forced to eat this genetically modified stuff, which is not good for us. They want us to be in poor health, they want us to be on all sorts of medication. And I think they want us to be on poor diets as well. Plus they’ll control the whole food supply for the whole world, so they’ll be making a load more money again off it. And that’s what the game is.

 

And I’ve just watched a little video now of some Labour woman having a go at Rishi [Sunak] in Parliament saying:

 

“These farmers that are protesting today, they’re conspiracy theorists! And they’re spreading conspiracy theories!”

 

It’s not a conspiracy when you can see it in black and white in front of you, what their plan is! How is that a conspiracy?

 

Mark Collett: Well, I couldn’t agree more, mate. To me the idea of replacing all natural, organic, homegrown food with lab grown meat and GM crops is absolutely sickening! I wouldn’t even want to eat that stuff, and I’ll eat most things.

 

But there’s something really creepy and sickening going on at the moment! And I look at it and I’ve got to say it fills me with dread for the future and the fact that we would give up our prime farmland to basically ensure that we can house this ever growing population which is growing at such a rapid rate thanks to mass immigration because the White birth rate will be the lowest birth rate of everyone living here. I think it’s terrifying! And I think we’re moving more rapidly than I ever thought we would. We’ve got those leaflets saying that Whites will be a minority by 2066. I think it’ll be sooner than that.

 

And I think that we are headed for absolute disaster! And we’re headed there more quickly with each passing day.

 

[12:04]

 

Joe Marsh: That’s right. The thing is see, is like our government is trotting out exactly the same line as every other government all around the world about this climate change thing. Now in this country, if they really cared about climate change and the environment, the last thing they would be doing is increasing the population and building more houses. And obviously more people means more resources to be used. It just doesn’t make sense, does it?

 

So the whole thing of this climate change is just absolute nonsense! And these words that I’m saying now, they’re trying to criminalise what I’m saying. They’re saying that this is “mal-information”. It’s information that whether it’s true or not, could be harmful.

 

So if they had their way I wouldn’t be allowed to come on a stream and say these things about the World Economic Forum, about the GM crops and food. It’s just like communism. With communism comes censorship. And they want to shut us up. Like they haven’t shut us up enough already! Did you see Douglas Murray last week? He’s the president of the Free Speech Union. He wants tighter hate crime laws!

 

Mark Collett: It’s worst than that Joe, he doesn’t just want tighter hate crime laws, he wants a hate crime register. Like a sex offender’s register, but for people who have committed hate crimes.

 

So if you’re a thought criminal, or a speech criminal, Douglas Murray wants there to be a special register that you go on for a number of years.

 

Now this, to me, is absolutely insane! But it just goes to show how these Zionists control all Angles.

 

So they are the ones who control the Free Speech Union, but they use their control over the Free Speech Union to actually call for anti-free speech laws! [chuckling] It’s absolutely incredible!

 

Joe Marsh: I think they’ve already got a register like that, that we just don’t know about. Because when I was younger, I went to university and I did a criminal justice degree and I had this idea to work with young offenders. And I was told that I would never be allowed to do that in a million years.

 

Yet when I was young and I got in a little bit of trouble, we had probation officers who were ex-criminals and they were thought of as in a good position to teach people because they’d been in trouble themselves, like me. I was in a lot of trouble when I was young, but hardly anything when I’d been older. You know what I mean?

 

So all my convictions were spent, I should have been able to get a job with the probation service, and they wouldn’t entertain me at all! I was just getting letters saying that they can’t employ me. And then I was threatening to sue them for discrimination. And they were saying they don’t give feedback on interviews, so they won’t tell you.

 

But I think that because I was a member of the BNP [British National Party], that I was blacklisted. That’s what I think. I’ll never be able to prove that.

 

But, I mean, obviously they want it to be even worse than that, don’t they? That you’d never be able to get a job sweeping up, then.

 

[15:28]

 

Mark Collett: I think they want to make it so everything is linked in to some kind of central system that grades you on your adherence to the current political narrative.

 

So if you are an Israel loving multicultural fanatic that basically cheerleads for mass immigration, you will be eligible for the best paid jobs and you will actively be sought out to do those jobs.

 

However, if you’re someone that has the wrong ideas, if you’re somebody who’s like:

 

“Well, Britain should be self sufficient, we should cap immigration, we should ensure that this is a monocultural society because multiculturalism leads to problems., …”

 

And I’m not a big fan of Israel because they are literally genociding the Palestinian people. Well, you’re going to be the kind of person that just doesn’t get a job, or they get a job, but they get one of these horrific jobs which know just soul crushing, and that’s all you end up doing, because the system will grind you down one way or another. I think that’s really what they’re looking for.

 

And I think eventually these things will be tied to universal credit or benefit payments. So if you aren’t actually doing the right thing, as the government sees it, you won’t even be someone who can claim full benefits, and you’re basically starved!

 

Joe Marsh: Yeah, well, this is what the thing with this digital currency and the IDs, their passports and all that sort of thing. You’ll be the bottom of the heap then. And they can switch you off, they can take money off you. This is the system they want.

 

And this is why I was reading about, like, you’ve been de-banked and everything, right? They’ve been taking bank accounts off small businesses. They reckon that 140,000 small businesses have had their bank accounts closed for no reason at all!

 

And part of that Agenda 2030 thing is they want to destroy the self employed, right? Because I’m self employed and that’s why I can come on here and I can say what I want. I can go to demonstrations, I can show my face because I can’t be sacked, because I work for myself. People need the skills that I’ve got. Even if somebody that I was doing work for didn’t like what I was saying, I could easily go somewhere else.

 

[18:08]

 

So they don’t want people to have that kind of ability to defy them. If the only jobs you can get are for the system and for big corporations where you have to watch your P’s and Q’s, they’ve got total control over everybody.

 

And this is one of the reasons why they want to destroy the farmers as well and all. Look at the amount of small businesses they destroyed during the lockdown. And they’re not happy with that, now they’re moving on to the next phase of debanking people, and it’s just going to go on and on and on!

 

Mark Collett: Well, I think the lockdowns were disastrous for small businesses. And I made a couple of videos at the time saying that the lockdowns were essentially a system of concentrating wealth up the food chain.

 

So essentially, it further cemented the power of companies like Blackrock, who were basically using other people’s misfortune in order to buy their properties, their businesses. There were these huge campaigns by Blackrock to people:

 

“Sell your home. You’ve got equity in your home, you’re struggling. Your business is going under. Unlock that equity today, sell to Blackrock! We will sort you out tomorrow!”

 

And we’ve seen similar things here in the UK with this Webuyanyhouse.com, where you can sell your house in literally days at a knockdown price, just to get your hands on a little bit of equity to keep your head above water. But all of this is concentrating power in the hands of a tiny number of companies, these megacorporations that will literally own everything.

 

So you will rent your house, you will get your food from these big GMO producing companies that produce all of their food. Nothing will be organic. Everything will be genetically modified, grown in vats. Your money will be provided to you by the government.

 

And we’ve seen it in Germany, where blocks of flats that are being rented out to people. The tenants have been told:

 

“If you do anything that we perceive to be Right-wing or supportive of Right-wing ideals, you will be immediately asked to leave the flat.”

 

Well, what do you do then? You can’t live anywhere. You can’t buy food. You eat what you are told to eat.

 

The whole thing is just a nightmare scenario. And it’s looking grimmer and darker with every day.

 

Joe Marsh: It’s like one of them crazy films that you watch. And it’s just like, people watch these films, like the Hunger Games, and they’re rooting for the heroes in these films. They don’t realise we’re actually living in those times!

 

But because they’re boiling the frog slowly, it’s just a little bit at a time, little bit at a time. Take your car off you, do this, do that, make it so expensive you can’t even use your car now and then. I’ve seen people from the World Economic Forum saying:

 

“You don’t need your car! Because your car is like, 90% of the time is packed up. So what’s the point of that?”

 

So in the future, you’ll just phone a taxi and the taxi will be driverless. You don’t need a car. So there’s your freedom gone then, right? Plus, you’re living in a 15 Minutes City, so you’re not allowed to go further than 15 minutes from home unless you got enough points.

 

[21:40]

 

And these are all the things that are creeping in, creeping in! And to watch those absolute criminals in Parliament screaming about conspiracy theories and demanding that we be silenced when we’re talking! Honestly, God is like living in, … I feel like sometimes I’m the only one that’s awake and everyone else is just sleepwalking around me.

 

But obviously, I know there’s a lot of other people on the same page, but the majority of the normies, they’re in a trance! And even people saying to me:

 

“Well, I don’t care because I’ll be dead then.”

 

But you might be dead, but your children won’t be. Nor will their children. You’re happy to just die and let your grandchildren be slaves? Not just slaves! A hated minority as well, in their own ancestral lands. It’s unbelievable! Just people are just so placid. It’s like as if they’re drugged up! And they’re just walking around accepting everything. Unbelievable!

 

Mark Collett: Well, that’s very much how I feel about it.

 

And I will say this. Watching people go from voting Labour back to the Tories, then back to Labour, then back to the Tories again, and now they’re going to go back to Labour again. And it’s almost like they bounce between these two near identical parties that all endorse exactly the same social changes, and the people are sort of sleepwalking towards their own demise.

 

It’s almost like being in the Matrix. Like you’re one of the few people. We are the few people that understand that we’re in The Matrix. We understand what’s going on and everyone else is just going about their day as if it’s all great, it’s all normal, it’s all fine.

 

But it’s absolutely not! We know it’s not. But telling them that you often get sort of laughed at or demeaned for even trying to tell normal people that there are serious problems coming.

 

And the fact that these politicians dare stand up in Parliament and call all of this “conspiracy theories” when they are the ones who are essentially playing a part in this, who are in part architects of this madness, it really boils me up!

 

But as you say, most people are still asleep. And with most people still being asleep, what do you think will finally rouse them, Joe? What’s finally going to get people off their asses and doing something right?

 

Joe Marsh: I really don’t know. I think since Covid thousands and thousands of people have woken up. I went to some of the big Covid marches in London. They were absolutely massive! Because we were marching down this street and it was chockka! And we went off down this alleyway and went to this cafe.

 

[24:41]

 

And then we had some food and we were in there for about half an hour. And we came back down the same alleyway and rejoined the march. And it was still going!

 

I think a lot of people woke up then, but a lot of people still got half the idea. There’s still a lot of gatekeepers around that are keeping people on a certain track, that you can wake up so much but not all the way.

 

So a lot of people have still got crazy half baked ideas. But a lot more people are awake now than were before covid. And I don’t know, I think it’s like things like this with the farmers and that it’s going to wake a lot more people up.

 

Because at the farmers meetings, the majority of them there were all talking about the same way I’m talking about the WEF and everything. They were all completely on that page. They’re not just blaming the Welsh government, the Westminster criminals. They know this is coming from higher up, and it’s a world-wide conspiracy to get rid of the farmers. They know that!

 

And that’s why that Labour MP, that woman today, is kicking off and more or less demanding that we be silenced on the internet, because she knows people are awake to what’s going on.

 

Mark Collett: Well, they’re also terrified about people knowing about the truth! I mean, last night we saw protests in Kildare in Ireland because allegedly there’s been a rape of a seven year old girl and people are reporting that she was raped by three Roma gypsies.

 

I mean, this is absolutely horrific! And these things aren’t just a one off, are they? These things aren’t one off. They’re not happening once in a blue moon. These horrific crimes are becoming more and more prevalent. They’re becoming more and more regular. We’re seeing this happen more and more, and they’re still letting more and more of these people in.

 

So we’re having all of our rights taken away, but we’re living in conditions where, well, fundamentally we need more rights to speak! Having your voice curtailed, being silenced when you’re living in these horrific anti-White conditions is basically taking away all the agency that we have as victims, and we are victims of this system.

 

I mean, this migrant crisis, it’s just going to go on and on and on! And with Israel talking about potentially displacing 2 million Palestinians, they’ll be coming here next.

 

But again, what do you think? Because people are angry. I’ve never really spoken to any normal people. And when I say normal people, I don’t mean rabid Lefties or teachers, but normal people I meet in my daily life. I went for my haircut today and everyone knows me in the barbershop and they were talking to me, all of them think that immigration is out of control. I’ve never met normal people who want more immigration. But it seems that we’re going to be getting a lot more!

 

And again, what do you think it’s going to take to actually motivate these people who don’t want what they’re being fed, into actually doing something about it and forming a resistance?

 

[28:01]

 

Joe Marsh: Well, the thing is, everybody I meet, … I’m in a building trade and I do small repairs. I might go to three or four different properties in a day. I meet plumbers, electricians, carpenters, all of them, they’re all saying:

 

“This out of control, this is ridiculous!”

 

But none of them will get involved in anything.

 

I always say:

 

“We’re doing a match on Saturday. Come with us!”

 

Like:

 

“Oh, I can’t because of my job or my misses will get funny.”

 

You know what I mean?:

 

“Oh, I got to take my daughter out.”

 

And all this sort of thing, and it’s just like everyone is moaning about it, nobody will do anything.

 

But the thing is, what, you know as well as I do, that over the last, like 20 years, the police have created a climate of fear that we don’t know all these hate crime laws. They progressively got more tighter and tighter. The wording of them is so elastic that they can just make it up as they go along. There’s no clear definition of what “hate” is.

 

They just like, well, look at what just happened to Sam [Melia]. That’s a perfect case:

 

“The stickers are legal, but we think that his mindset was that he wanted to insult minorities.”

 

And it’s just unbelievable! It’s getting worse and worse and worse! I can’t blame some people when they think:

 

“Well, if I go on a march with Joe on Saturday, I might get my door kicked in!”

 

This is how people think. And even posting on the internet. Like I know people who are not involved in nationalism and they’ve had the police at their houses because they’ve made a comment on the Daily Mail’s comment section and things like that. They’re literally telling people:

 

“You need to shut up!”

 

So that’s one of the factors stopping people from getting on the streets. Somebody said to me on one of the demos we were on a while ago:

 

“If you couldn’t lose your job over this, we’d have lots more people on the demos.”

 

And we would. We’ve got people who work for major supermarkets and things like that, and if they get outed, they’re going to lose their job. They’re involved with us, but they’re like half-handedly because they’re:

 

“Oh my God! What if I get doxxed?”

 

And all this sort of thing.

 

So that’s one of the things holding everyone back. What we need is we should have the First Amendment sort of thing, but they’re never going to give us that. Even if they said they give us a Constitution or Bill of Rights, it would be written up now with all the LGBT shit and all the, …, you know what I mean? The protected characteristics and all that shit would be involved in it, you know what I mean? So it would not be freedom of speech anyway.

 

I think the only thing that’s going to get the British people really moving and on the streets is when they’ve literally got nothing left! When they can’t put food on the table.

 

[31:25]