Joel Davis: We should be live. It is the 19th of December, 2024, and another show for you guys this evening. Our big stories from last week seem to continue to be the big stories again. The war on freedom by the jews perpetuates. So we’ll be talking about that. And with the new laws that they’re proposing to bring it into Victoria because there was a synagogue fire that was allegedly, I think a jew did it. But they haven’t actually determined who did it. But that’s good enough reason, even though they haven’t determined who did it or why, to take away freedoms to politically demonstrate peacefully. Like, what’s the connection? So we’ll discuss that.

We’ll also discuss the development of the Parminder Singh Gate or Parmindigate, as it’s been called on Twitter, where, yeah, One Nation have been running this Indian candidate and it’s caused, I mean, the story., … There’s so many new elements to the story. I wrote an opinion piece on it a few days ago for The Noticer and there’s even more elements of the story coming through now. So we’re going to talk about that.

Also, there’s been another shooting in America that’s kind of gay and weird, but instead of was, I guess, at least it’s a different shooting than last week. But yeah, this teenage girl, you know, trying to be edgy, doing some dumb school shooting. The alleged manifesto that was her manifesto was, yeah, really like incoherent and weak. So we’ll be discussing that and some other things. Thomas Sewell will be joining us soon as well, so we’ll get his thoughts as well this evening on all of this.

But how you doing this evening, Blair?

Blair Cottrell: All right. I just worked out how to share this on an X account because on my phone I can’t see a lot of your tweets. There’s some sort of ban or layer of censorship on the posts that you make. And I still haven’t actually worked out how to get around that on my phone, I think I can see them on my laptop. So I was able to share for the first time, I’m sharing our show on X and I’m glad I figured out how to do it.

Other than that, yeah, I’m fine, man! Everything’s good. Been training pretty hard, which has resulted in me feeling a bit more stressed. Well, not feeling stressed, but my body is showing signs of stress. Like I have a little, a mini, little ulcer on my tongue, probably from training too much. But I’m getting more time to train because it’s coming up to the end of the year and clients are starting to drop off, people are getting ready for Christmas, and I have more free time. I’m glad for that you know, it gives me the time, the chance to get inside my own head and process my own thoughts, which I really enjoy doing. Actually, I feel like if I don’t get that time, I get very angry.

But, yeah, a little bit tired, but I’ll stay with it. Like you said, the news seems to be just further developments on what we talked about last week, but still interesting.

Yeah, just a little segue before we get stuck into it, before Tom arrives, I was just scrolling X as one does, and I saw a picture of what I thought was a young me. I’m like:

“Whoa, that looks like me when I was 16 and in construction.”

But then on closer inspection, it wasn’t me, but it was posted by Victoria police. They’re looking for a guy. Yeah, see if you can bring it up, because they’re looking for a guy in Balaclava, which is a suburb down in Victoria, Australia, which is heavily populated by jews. I think.

Joel Davis: Police are investigating a report of racially motivated offensive behaviour.

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know what that means exactly, but that looks exactly like me when I was a teenager. Look at that. This looks like skinny, younger me coming home from work.

Joel Davis: Pre-steroid Blair.

Blair Cottrell: Come on man! Anyway, scroll down. Scroll down because police.

Joel Davis: I got my cop coming in. He didn’t do nothing!

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I know. I saw that. And I think it’s one of the best, but keep scrolling down. I mean, everybody, this is a serious story, right? Offensive behaviour, racially motivated offensive conduct. Should read the comments for more information.

Joel Davis: What is the charge? Speaking of slur, a succulent ethnic slur! [chuckling] Being White in public is now illegal! Where’s his energy? Motivated violence against Whites by Sudanese immigrants at train stations. Comfy, friend with the big comment there? Yeah, what the fuck is offensive behaviour?

Blair Cottrell: There’s got to be a list.

Joel Davis: Even if I knew him, I wouldn’t report it to you fucking pigs! All the boys in there and the girls. Yeah, look at this guy. He’s just photoshopped a jew’s face. Arrest all people who look like this. People are just going hard in the comments.

Blair Cottrell: That’s what community pressure looks like. That’s what a legitimate, organic community response to a police story looks like. If you give everyone free speech, this is what happens. That’s why free speech is a great thing! That’s why we support free speech, because that gives us the ability to speak. And this is what happens. A lot more people out there have more based opinions than you realise. And threads like that demonstrate that reality.

[05:30]

Joel Davis: Quite funny. Well, I hope they don’t catch him.

But if you do have any information on this individual. Please forward it to the NSN contact bot. We’d love to recruit him. We’re pretty racially motivated ourselves.

But anyway, [chuckling] that is a funny story. I mean, hopefully doesn’t get in trouble. I don’t know what happened there, but it’s obviously a nothing burger. Offensive behaviour is the most ridiculous crime. Like, how is that even a crime? We should have a right to behave offensively in this country. I mean, what the hell, we’re Australians! This is ridiculous! But I digress.

As I said, there’s a few big stories to talk about the first thing I want to talk about, Blair, you were shutting me down last week because I was talking about how that Luigi, I can’t remember his last name, some Italian shit! That Luigi guy in America who shot the CEO of some health insurance company or whatever. I was saying that the terror, it was kind of gay and boring. You know, his terrorism was boring. It wasn’t interesting. This is a far cry from the interesting terrorists of yesteryear. You know, like Ted Kaczynski or whatever. I’m not going to rattle off all the names. And you were trying to shut me down. You know, you were saying, …

Blair Cottrell: Hey, that’s a pretty rough way to put it. I wasn’t trying to shut you down.

Joel Davis: Just trying to cancel me. I wasn’t being politically correct enough. The “woke” were coming at me.

Blair Cottrell: We need to be smart. If you’re going to start talking about sensitive topics, we need to skim across the surface of them without getting too analytical, you know, sharing opinions. You know, that’s the way things are. I don’t want to be, …

Joel Davis: Like I said terrorism, but I was saying the opposite. I was saying that this particular piece of terrorism is gay. And it’s like the, like terrorism has lost its way. And then I think that was an accurate call because then an even gayer form of terrorism happened in America this week, or a few days ago with this 15 year old girl who’s a little edgelord retard decided to shoot up her school and then kill herself for literally no reason. I read the manifesto this week.

Blair Cottrell: What is this? I haven’t seen any information on this. Have you got something to bring up on the screen?

Joel Davis: I can find something in a sec.

But basically she’s a 15 year old girl. Can’t remember her name. But the manifesto was just like deranged rambling about how she doesn’t like her parents and like life sucks! And it was like this like nihilistic yap that had no like discernible point. Like there’s no political message. There was no real existential message. Like it just seemed like she was like moody, like some emo moody chick. And then she’s gone along and like done something crazy like that. Terrorism has just become gay now. I said something on Twitter, like:

“Terrorism is like where rock music was in the late 2000s.”

You know, it’s just gay and lame at this point. And the only people that take it seriously are like retarded teenage girls. She was obviously trying to do some kind of like Columbine shooting, you know, homage. But at least the Columbine guys had cool clothes and stuff. They were retarded as well. But at least they had like an aesthetic. They had like an energy.

The point that I’m making actually is ASIO [Australian Security Intelligence Organisation] should be happy about my message. My message is that terrorism has become gay. Don’t try terrorism because you’re going to come off like a fag. Like everyone that’s trying to do this stuff lately. That [guy] set himself on fire for Palestine. I can’t remember his name. That was lame as well. It’s all become very like played out at this point. It’s been done. Plenty of others have got the headlines and they’ve done it cooler than you and more interestingly than you. And it’s old at this point! You know, it’s like trying to make a grunge band. It’s like the 90s was like three decades ago. What are you doing? Like, it’s over! No one’s gonna care. You know what I’m saying?

Blair Cottrell: I suppose so.

I don’t have a lot of thoughts on the matter. I just think shooting or killing random people because you’re mad about something in order to make a statement and have an impact on society or to attempt to have an impact on society. I just think it’s deranged bullshit, man! I always have. I don’t really find any sort of terrorism interesting. I’m not one of those people who’s like:

“Let’s study these psychos and work out the way the psychology of a pervert, or a murderer, or a paedophile!”

That’s what modern psychology does. It’s like:

“Let’s deconstruct and understand them.”

No, you don’t have to understand these people. You just execute them. They’re defective and you just execute them. You know, I have to say that. I can’t say anything even remotely in support of politically motivated violence. Very sensitive times in Australia.

[10:28]

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, that’s what I’m saying. I’m criticising politically motivated violence. I’m saying every time someone seems to engage in it just keeps getting gayer and gayer. Like, I mean, terrorism is either gay or it’s totally fake! Like this fake jew firebombing on the synagogue. I mean you had 9/11 where the jews blew up the Twin Towers, [see links below re 9/11 being a ZOG false flag] and then like, blamed it on, … Apparently we had to invade Iraq for some reason because an Israeli think tank commissioned by Benjamin Netanyahu in the 1990s, transplanted itself into America, called itself the Project of the New American Century [PNAC]. And then Richard Perle, this dual citizen, ends up saying:

“Hey, this idea that we had in this Israeli think tank about invading Iraq in the mid-90s, we’re going to like, dress it up in neocon language and then try and sell it to conservatives in America in 1999.”

And then he gets put into the Bush administration and then the jews do the fake 9/11. And then even the official story is that there was Saudi Arabian terrorists. What the hell does that have to do with Iraq?

But that really pissed everybody off. And then boom, da, da boom! Apparently Saddam Hussein has Weapons of Mass Destruction and he’s friends with Al Qaeda or something. And then the CIA literally said to the Bush administration:

“Well, that’s bullshit! Like, our intelligence doesn’t say that.”

And so they created a whole sub-dimension of the government called the Office of Special Plans run by the Zionists and jews in the Bush administration to create all this fake intelligence as a pretext to invade Iraq. We invade Iraq:

“Oh, there’s no Weapons of Mass Destruction!”

But Israel’s plan from the mid-90s to invade Iraq gets achieved.

So this is the jewish playbook. Fake terrorism is a jewish playbook. And you know that basically was used as a pretext to destroy, to basically bring in all these new laws that facilitated mass surveillance and anti-terrorism legislation that is now being used against nationalists and all the rest of it. And they’re doing it again. The jewish playbook of fake terrorism where you know, they burn their own synagogue and then the solution to your synagogue getting firebombed isn’t a task force against political firebombings or religious firebombings or something. That would actually solve the apparent issue that was created. But we haven’t even figured out who did the firebombing. I don’t think we ever will because I think the Counter Terrorism police know that the jews did it to themselves. But apparently the solution is to ban masks at public demonstrations and to prevent people from doing rallies within 150 meters of religious buildings, which by the way, there’s churches all through the centre of Melbourne.

So that means that like major landmarks in Melbourne, like I think Flinders Street Station, we’ve done rallies before over the years. I remember watching a video of you, Blair, from I think Tom might have been there too. This is like from like eight or nine years ago you guys did a rally at Flinders Street Station. And obviously we did the ‘Mass Deportations Now’ rally earlier this year, you know, at Flinders Street Station or partially at Flinders Street Station. So that’s a very significant landmark in Melbourne, right across from Fed Square. But it’s within 150 meters of a church. So now you can’t do a demonstration there? Oh well, not now. But when these laws inevitably get passed. What the hell does that have to do with firebombing? Firebombing is already illegal. Why can’t you just prosecute the firebombing?

But what this shows is that what jews are afraid of isn’t actually terrorism, but they’re afraid of his criticism! You know, every time jews do a fake terror attack, all the laws that they get passed and the agenda that gets passed has nothing to do with the original thing. It’s just an excuse to violate your rights and to direct the government into doing things that the jews already wanted to do prior to the alleged act. And we’ve seen now as well, …

Blair Cottrell: Why do you think jews are afraid of criticism?

Joel Davis: Well, they’re afraid of criticism because they’ve committed crimes on like a societal scale. They subverted this country. They have incredible power, way more power than they should have as 0.4% of the population.

And also they use that power to siphon off resources and support for Israel even though Israel’s got nothing to do with Australia. Why does Peter Dutton do press conferences with the Australian flag and the Israeli flag behind him? Why? Why is Israel even an issue in Australian politics? It’s on the other side of the fucking world! What relevance does it have to us? Nothing! The relevance it has is that jews control Australia. Jews control Australian politics. Like what the Jacinta Allan, the Premier of Victoria, said in a press conference is:

“This is what we’re going to do for the jews.”

And then outlined a whole series of laws that they’re going to pass. She literally said:

“This is for the jews!”

That’s crazy! They’re 0.4% of the population. Why do they just have the major parties? Because the Liberals love the jews even more than Labor. Why are they falling over themselves to prove how much they love the jews and prostrate themselves before them and say:

“We’re doing as much as we can to pass as many laws to make it impossible for the people you don’t like!”

Which isn’t just us. They’re coming after us to try to destroy our ability to protest, but they’re also going after the pro-Palestine Left. They want to shut down any kind of political activity that jews don’t like. And this is somehow relevant because if people do political activity that’s critical of jews, someone might want to go and firebomb a synagogue or something. And so like, you can’t just have a law against firebombing. You have to completely control how people think and how people act so just ban all criticism of jews from society entirely. I mean, it’s ridiculous! It’s tyrannical!

But nevertheless, what the government is showing is that to them, jewish feelings matter more than our freedoms or any kind of modicum of fairness. I mean, there was a church in Geelong that was burnt down a few weeks ago. Where’s the anti-Christian task force? There was a priest stabbed in Sydney earlier this year in the middle of a church service by a Muslim terrorist. You know, like it’s only the jews that get these special protections.

[16:47]

Blair Cottrell: Not just interject for a moment to draw attention to Tom Sewell’s new moustache. Looking great, mate! Kind of reminiscent of Mosley or something. What made you go with the stash?

Thomas Sewell: Hello, can you hear me?

Blair Cottrell: Loud and clear.

Thomas Sewell: This is the first stream that I’ve done for the Joel, … Sorry, let me just mute all my shit!

Blair Cottrell: … For a few weeks, man! What’s happening?

Thomas Sewell: Well, I needed some time to process, you know, digest. There’s a lot going on in the world, obviously. But, yeah, I got a new cam and a new mic, so hopefully I’m coming through nice and clear. The MO was just “Movember” for last month, and I decided to keep it because my dad had a MO when I was born. So I figured I’ll keep it until the next one’s born. I got a baby on the way, so could be anytime soon. I won’t say exactly how soon, but very soon.

Blair Cottrell: Well, congratulations, man! It’s exciting stuff! Lots of boys having babies in the community throughout Australia, I’ve noticed. Lots of new families being started. Some guys quite young, too. They’re getting started young. They’re like 22 years old. Punching our kids already, which is awesome to see. I think it’s better off having kids when you’re younger. They’re bound to be healthier when you’re younger. What do you guys think?

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I do regret in some ways not starting younger. And the main reason for that is. Yeah, it’s the first six months especially is really hard, and it takes up a lot of your time. It all works out, I think, anyway. At the end of the day, you either have kids early and then you develop that part of your life while you’re young. And then when you’re older, you can develop deeper parts of your understanding philosophy. You have more time to yourself.

I mean, I know a lot of Boomers and a lot of that generation, once their kids grow up, they kind of just go on holiday. But I think what you’re meant to do is leave some sort of intellectual legacy. You’re meant to do something worthwhile. A lot of people just, it’s sort of career or holiday. They don’t really think about anything more than that.

But the other way of doing it, rather than having kids and then developing that stuff later, is you develop in your 20s and 30s, your world view and your philosophy, your personal constitution, and then you have kids later, in which case you’re going to then struggle to have time to continue to develop, but hopefully you’ve laid enough of a foundation. So I think it balances out. But I would have preferred to have been changing nappies and going through screaming babies in my early 20s than my early 30s. So I sympathize with those in their 40s that are doing it. I can certainly think of better things to be doing in my 40s than dealing with screaming babies. Because you just want peace and quiet.

As a man, I think the most important thing for developing your personal constitution is peace and quiet. And if you’re just in constant baby family chaos, you can’t really develop like your drive, your mission, your focus. You kind of just caught up in the feminine chaos of the babies. So it makes me think a lot about our ancestors and our ancestral culture. A lot of ancient Germanic and Celtic cultures. They didn’t! The father didn’t really have much of a this is what I’ve read. I don’t know if this is fact, but what I’ve read is that the fathers didn’t have much input until the sons turned 10 and there was sort of a transfer of ownership. Men sort of stayed out of the mums and bubs club, so to speak, and the toddlers and all that. Obviously you’re still there, you’re still present, but you know, there’s a water fight usually. So yeah, not until a boy’s around 10 years old is there that one on one time consistently.

Blair Cottrell: I could imagine you would feel once you’ve had a child even more of a drive to make a difference and to do something that makes you useful. Do you find that’s a sensation you’ve experienced after having a kid?

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, absolutely! It’s what ties us to the infinite.

So I believe that our children are our afterlife and that we heal this world by making better humans. I think that’s the primary point of what we’re doing. We make better humans. We’re in this mess because of shit humans. We can talk about the jews, we can talk about the Africans, we can talk about all these horrible circumstances, economic pressures. But all of this, in my opinion, is secondary to the quality of humans we’re producing. And if we produce better quality humans in terms of environment, stock, that software, you know what operating system, what personal constitution are you plugging into them? How are you explaining the world to them? And how are you helping them grow and adapt and overcome this dystopian society that we live in?

So to me that’s absolutely crucial and it’s extremely motivating because. Yeah, it’s like when you have kids, then you’re trying to create a better world for them, not just like your motivation is now rooted to the centre.

[22:01]

Blair Cottrell: And why wouldn’t you make better quality versions of yourself if you could? Why wouldn’t you make copies of yourself? I mean, our own lives in the span of all existence, eternity, are absurdly short. Our lives are like a blip on the screen. And we are here now because our parents, their parents, all made copies of themselves. We are just copies of our forefathers, forebearers. So I’ve always believed the same thing too. Like, what is a greater purpose than trying to breed a higher humanity? At the end of the day, that’s the only real meaning of life that in this physical realm we can understand to be true and worth pursuing.

Thomas Sewell: Absolutely, yeah.

Joel Davis: Yeah.

So anyway, onto the news stories. I think I’ll just play this clip, actually. I’ll get you guys to react. I know a lot of people have probably seen it, but this is the Premiere of Victoria, Jacinta Allan announcing these new laws that they want to pass.

Jacinta Allan: Today, the government of Victoria renews its promise to jews and to everyone of every background. Whoever you are, whoever you pray to, you deserve to be safe and welcome here in this state. Today too, we support that promise with strong action, strong action to fight hate and help Victorians heal! Action that I will now outline. We will be setting a standard, a standard that we do not tolerate anti-semitism. We do not tolerate anti-semitism! Just as we do not tolerate any form of hate, racism or discrimination against a jew, a Muslim, a Sikh, a Hindu, a Chinese Victorian, or against a woman, against a gay, lesbian or trans person. It’s all despicable! All racism is wrong! All racism is evil! It’s hateful, it’s corrosive. And anti-semitism is racism! And there are too many, there are too many who want to qualify anti-semitism or make excuses for it. And I want to make it absolutely clear that I never will!

We’ve also had enough of the protests that have caused division and disruption in our streets. Now, peaceful protests can and must be protected in this state. Protests that harm others cannot!

Firstly, we will ban the flags and symbols of listed terrorist organisations in public. That includes Hamas, Hezbollah and several other groups, including White national extremists and radical, racist, violent extremist Right-wing groups. We will also ban the use of face masks and balaclavas at protests. We know they are being used to conceal identities, shield agitators from crowd control measures, like capsicum spray. Well, face masks aren’t a free pass to break the law. And there should be no place to hide in this state if you’re a racist stirring up hate on the streets.

And we’re also going to ban the use of glue, rope, chains, locks and other dangerous attachment devices that protesters use to cause maximum disruption and also endanger others. There was an incident that occurred, an incident that was both rightly condemned, but also an incident that became the Genesis of the work that we have released on introducing stronger anti-vilification laws to the Victorian Parliament. But we know it’s rearing its head again and we will act. We will legislate to protect the right for people to gather and pray free from fear, free from harassment and free from intimidation from, …

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, she only mentions enemies of the jewish community. Like apparently anti-fascist violence is fine. One of the boys had his car firebombed about a year ago around Christmas, a year ago. That was Leftist extremism. But apparently that’s not a problem because they don’t cause any issue for the jewish community, they only target the enemies of jews! An important point, I think.

Joel Davis: No, of course! Also you notice there, she didn’t mention in these list of protected groups Whites or any religions that Whites practice in any serious number when she was mentioning religions. So it’s typical, but it’s nevertheless exposing what we say is true, it’s revealing, the system is showing its face that, yeah, as you just said quite accurately, the number one protected community is the jews. No one is allowed to criticise them.

And then the number two protected communities are basically everyone who isn’t White. And yeah, the banning face masks thing, that will be interesting. Obviously we use them at demonstrations, but we also get criticised a lot for using them. So now we’re just going to have to, probably when they pass these laws in Victoria, we’re going to have to do demonstrations without face masks.

Blair Cottrell: I gotta say this, you guys could look cooler without the masks. I mean, you’re good looking boys. This could be a beautiful blessing in disguise.

[27:14]

Joel Davis: We’ve had internal debates about it. Like a lot of us want to take the masks off. And I think it will make us look more human to the public.

So yeah, it could backfire. Like the jews have banned the Roman salute, they’ve banned the masks and everyone says:

“Oh I like what you guys do, but the balaclavas and the Roman salutes that not going to appeal to normies.”

Well, the jews are forcing us to have normie appeal! So if this is how they’re going to play it, I guess we’re going to have to play it by these rules. You know, it is what it is. It’ll be interesting to see if it ends up backfiring on the jews and they just end up making us more popular with the public.

So I think also the jews are making themselves less popular with the public because they’re making this very explicit, like for a very long time, when you start talking about the jews in Australia, people are like:

“What are you like? This is crazy talk!”

And also it’s very abstract. You’re talking about the banking system or international finance or things happening in America, things happening in the Middle East, things happening historically in Europe, doesn’t feel very real and important to average everyday Australians and their average everyday lives. But this is very explicit. This is the jews coming after your freedoms in Australia in 2024. This is the jews attacking you! Flexing on you!

And so now the jewish problem isn’t just some abstract problem. It isn’t just some thing that fringe people talk about. Now. This is actually something that everyday Australians have to be confronted with, which is that they live in a jewish dominated society. And why does 0.4% of the population get to order the government around? Why does the government, why are the major parties falling all over themselves to grovel to this group? They’re not a significant voter base. There’s barely any jewish voters.

So the only reason that they could be groveling to them is because they have money and power! It’s the only reason! They have a lot of it! And that should concern you that your government is beholden to a tiny ethnic group with incredible money and power that can essentially, according to the whims of its hysteria, trash your rights!

But what’s interesting is that I’m seeing a lot of criticism for these new laws from the far-Left. And also maybe I don’t mind that Antifa’s not allowed to wear masks anymore. You know, they also going to bring in anti-doxing laws in Australia, which the jews pushed for because some jews got doxed by pro-Palestinian activists or whatever.

So they’re going to ban doxing, they’re going to ban face masks. What’s Antifa going to do now? Like their whole strategy is kind of fucking! Like they can’t go, …

Blair Cottrell: Disguises aren’t banned. You just wear disguises. As long as it’s not like a face covering.

Joel Davis: Well, what kind of disguise can you wear that isn’t a face covering?

Blair Cottrell: There’s like stockings that change your face, but they’re not really a mask or you could wear. And they don’t even look like you’re wearing a mask.

Joel Davis: I think the law might still cover that. I mean, we don’t know the exact legislation right now, but I would anticipate they wouldn’t leave any of those easy loopholes like that.

Blair Cottrell: You never know.

Joel Davis: Yeah, I guess we’ll see. But I think, it’s interesting, Antifa’s gonna have to take the masks off. They can’t dox people anymore. Now you’re gonna be able to start, you’re gonna be able to sue the Left. If they dox you for being a White nationalist or something and try and get you fired from your job, you can go after them now. Media too. So that’s interesting.

Blair Cottrell: No one on the Right seems to sue anyone. Well, there’s been a couple of, …

Joel Davis: Well, they should we need to try and make use of these laws and because doxing is one of the main weapons the enemy uses to keep people scared, to speak out or even to maintain anonymous accounts or whatever.

So there’s been plenty of people over the years that I know of that have been advocates for our way of thinking to some level or degree that have been doxed and they’ve been taken out, wiped off the Internet or had their careers ruined or their lives ruined in one way, shape or form. So that’s interesting. But that’s a little bit, that’s a bit of a separate issue.

But the point is that the rules are changing. Yeah, like I’m annoyed at the rules changing, but it isn’t actually the worst set of rule changes. Like we can adapt to these rule changes. It’s not going to stop us.

So you know it, all they’re doing is showing their hand. But they’re not really getting a huge win out of this. Like it seems to me to be a misstep where they’re pissing everyone off. I’ve seen the Left is pissed off! Libertarians are pissed off!

A lot of people that are kind of more pro-Israel or whatever that are on the conservative side, they’re really struggling to defend this. You know, they look kind of silly at this point because now it’s not just about being pro-Palestine or it’s not just about being pro-this group or that group now. It’s like:

“Well, our freedoms!”

I thought the whole point of being allied with Israel is that they’re a liberal democracy and the Judeo-Christian values and our rights and freedoms and all this bullshit! Well, they’re just showing that’s all nonsense and doesn’t mean anything.

Blair Cottrell: Did you actually think that?

Joel Davis: Well, I never thought that, but I’m talking about what conservatives think. I’m saying like the narratives are kind of collapsing to defend the jews from a lot of corners ideologically and they’re losing a lot of support from all corners. You know, when I’ve been making anti, … I’ll go and leave comments on Twitter that’ll be calling out the jews, but they’ll be some anti-Israel comment. And then I see all the likes are all Leftists. Like a lot of Leftists are genuinely like anti-semitic at this point. They aren’t just anti-Israel. Like, I don’t know, The Times are changing. The jews don’t have a lot of friends and they’re rapidly destroying their friendships in a lot of corners. And they’ve just got all this power they’re holding on. They’re kind of ham fisting through the power and influence that they have on the basis of their finances and their elite institutional power. But they’re not doing it very good of selling it. Their optics is terrible, their public relations is terrible!

So it’s a perfect environment for us to spread our message against them. So I invite them to make missteps like this to be honest, I’m not. I actually think it’s in a certain way, like it’s a bad thing that they’re doing. Obviously we don’t want these laws, but in a certain way I invite them to do things like this because it’s only proving our point and strengthening our position politically in a certain way.

What do you think about that Tom? Do you agree or disagree?

[33:31]

Thomas Sewell: I’ll let Blair go first.

Blair Cottrell: I was just thinking maybe in the long run it will create strong sense of dissatisfaction, disloyalty in the general community, or maybe they can downgrade the quality of the people so much that kind of fear Police State will be enough to administer them long term. I just think like in the immediate future having laws against anti-semitism which, it’s quite a vague basis for any set of laws, which leads to the police kicking your door down because of some comment you made on the Internet that’s offensive, racially offensive, whatever, probably isn’t a good thing in the short term.

Joel Davis: The anti-vilification laws are concerning. Those are different laws than these ones. But yeah, those are the more concerning ones. Those were going to have to fight hard in the courts.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah it doesn’t feel like there are enough people with the right sort of stuff and legal prowess to actually put up a good fight. But I could be wrong. The Clive Palmers out there might have a building full of lawyers that may be useful for that purpose.

But it’s probably about time some people who still believe in protecting Australia dedicate some resources to defending the rights of Australians. I don’t have any power. I’m just sitting down here in the suburbs trying to run my business and doing my best to pay my taxes. I’m not the sort of person that knows lots of lawyers and that has a lot of influence in this field. But I don’t know, hopefully people out there get the message sooner or later.

And I’m not seeing any great effort right now in the courts to actually establish, you know, boundaries, freedom of expression for Australians to challenge this legislation that is used to justify hate speech crime and stuff like that. But maybe I’m wrong. Maybe this kind of stuff is just hushed up and I don’t know about it. I’m just saying that I think in the short term all these things can be bad.

However, I understand what you’re saying. It’s clear overreach. And it lends to the criticism or observations that we’ve already made and we’re trying to make other people aware of that the jewish people do have a great deal of power in our country. Undue power! How did they get it? Who’s allowing them to have it? And how do we take back power for ourselves and establish a destiny, a future existence for ourselves as Australians. Because right now we don’t seem to have one.

Joel Davis: No, exactly! But what you were saying though, there was a lot of coalescence of support around Jacob [Hersant] and his court battles and that’s going up the courts. We don’t expect the lower courts to strike down laws and rule in our favour, but we do expect to have a strong case going up to the Supreme Court and then particularly in the High Court. And the same thing with this anti-vilification legislation. What is key is that the first people that get charged with this stuff, which will probably be our guys in a lot of these situations because they’re going to come for us with these laws, is riding it all the way up to the High Court. And for that we need community support from the nationalist community in general. But not just that, we need to go out beyond that and get libertarians and other adjacent factions that care about defending these rights.

Blair Cottrell: Here’s the thought. How long will White Australian cops willingly enforce these laws? Is there always going to be people who are willing to trade the future of their country for a meagre wage? Or eventually are most cops going to fall off and be replaced with Indians, Chinese and so forth?

Joel Davis: That’s already happening, isn’t it, because of Covid? I mean a lot of the all the good cops left during Covid and now they’re bringing in foreigners as police. And they’re not just like immigrants, they’re literally recruiting from foreign countries.

Blair Cottrell: We’re going to have a significant physical advantage over the police force if it ends up being completely Indian, for example. And so it’s like that’ll be interesting times, that’ll be sporty times.

Joel Davis: No, I would definitely like a situation where NSN’s on the streets and we swell up. We’ve got like some better than like bigger numbers and, …

Blair Cottrell: We’re the police now!

Joel Davis: These cops show up and it’s on. That’d be a funny interaction, if and when it happens. What a juxtaposition.

Thomas Sewell: It’ll make more people support us. More White Australian support us. When they see that it’s Indian cops versus the White lads that have to be mask off and maybe have to carry Australian flags and all the other sort of optics cuckery we’re forced into by the State, I think that’s just going to Garner more and more public support. So in a strange kind of accelerationist or anti-accelerationist way, the government is strengthening our position in the eyes of the public. They’re doing all these things in hopes that we give up, but we’re actually not going to give up. We’ve picked this strategy because it’s the most effective at creating that juxtapositional, that shock and awe strategy to wake the public up into action. And over time we’re going to become more and more legitimate. But it’s very hard to create legitimacy when no one puts up any opposition. And if they do put up opposition, it’s so tame that it doesn’t even get any attention.

[39:01]

So you have to get the people’s attention first. I’m not saying you get attention and then you start mellowing out your message. You maintain a strong message and everyone knows what you’re about. And most people have a decent memory. Even if they get confused by the current thing every two weeks, they still have a decent memory as to:

“Well, those are the racists!”

And we’re normalizing racism, we’re normalizing White nationalism and White people are overall getting to the point where they’re just upset with how the state of the country is.

And then they’re about to have Christmas and they want to just relax and wind down and celebrate. And it’s a spiritual and it’s a cultural time of year for White people and they turn on the news and it’s just jews complaining that there’s not enough laws against people that hate them.

And as a White person, you’re watching that and you’re just like:

“When are these jews going to shut up? Are they ever going to be happy?”

And then you hear that more money is going to them and we’re in a cost of living crisis. And if you’ve been paying attention, you know that they already get hundreds of millions of dollars a year for their so-called “security”, which they funnel into their fake security companies that they launder money back into the synagogue and probably do all sorts of dubious things with it once they’ve got it there.

And on top of that it goes into CSG [Community Security Group] here in Victoria, which is a Mossad front group which is funded by the Australian taxpayer and the Victorian taxpayer. So on top of that, the way that the politicians are handling it is the worst possible way to handle it. I guess they’re just not equipped with any sort of nuance. But I personally am sick, and I say this almost every stream with you guys when you put a politician up like the video up. And my initial instinct or reaction was I feel like I’m in primary school! Like listening to this Jacinta Allan:

“We do not do anti-semitism!”

[Blair putting in some eye drops] What’s going on there? Clear us. You’re right, Blair? We’re back.

Blair Cottrell: Yes. My eyes get a bit dry. But while I’m interjecting, don’t you agree though that it’s like the jewish version of rioting. I said this to Joel the other day. The jewish response to the synagogue fire is like the jewish version of a riot. It’s not physical. It’s like complaining:

“Give us money, give us rights, give us more laws!”

Joel Davis: Because they’re a feminine race, passive aggressive response.

Blair Cottrell: If the government could learn, see the way the Assyrians reacted to a terror attack against Bishop Murray, the Christian Assyrians they physically rioted. And the government’s response to that was:

“No tolerance!”

They arrested the Christians and made a strong effort to demonstrate themselves, you know, controlling the situation, containing the situation:

“This riot’s not acceptable!”

Why doesn’t the government take the same position towards the jewish version of rioting, which is just, as I said, kvetching.

Thomas Sewell: Because they’re all just a bunch of primary school teachers. These politicians aren’t leaders, they’re just primary school teachers. And they just lecture the public the way a primary school teacher lectures a small child. Like:

“We do not do anti-semitism, we do not do anti-semitism!”

I mean, who are they talking to?

And then the other thing that I noticed was the it’s a little bit of a will to power, to be honest, to give them a bit of fairness. Not that they deserve it, but they haven’t passed these laws yet. But they always speak as if they’ve already passed them or that they’re going to pass.

So they’re saying:

“We’re going to, …”

Well, that’s technically not correct. Not to sound like a conservative, but you’re going to “try to change the law”. That’s what they’re planning on doing. You’re going to try. What the accurate statement would be is:

“We’re going to try to change the law to strengthen these religious vilification laws.”

But they didn’t say that, they said:

“We’re going to change the law.”

So although it’s got a bit of a will to power and there’s a bit of strength to that, it’s the only strength they really portray is when jews are under attack. All of a sudden the government are very strong. But the problem is that that might work on some people, but the average Joe wants to at least pretend that we live in a democracy. And when that is no longer the tone at which they’re being spoken to by their leaders, they’re not going to be looking for Democratic or liberal means to counter the way that the centre Left is speaking to them. They’re going to be looking for a slightly more authoritarian tone amongst the centre Right, which I guess goes into our next point, doesn’t it Joel?

The self implosion of One Nation. [chuckling] Where the centre is going now is in two places. You know, the Left are just doubling down and the Right doesn’t know what to do and doesn’t have any representation within The Liberal Party or Labor Party or One Nation for that matter. And they’re absolutely begging now for a semi-authoritarian centre Right, that has that same kind of tone. Because there has to be a balancing. There has to be this harmony, for politics to survive as a democracy, there has to be equal weights on either side of the centre. And otherwise it keeps tipping one way until the Left take total state power and just tell you what’s going on. They don’t even consult.

[44:33]

Joel Davis: But we talked about on the show last.

Thomas Sewell: Do you want to move on to the next subject or was there more?

Joel Davis: Yeah, I’ll bring it in. But I’m just going to reiterate what we were talking about last week. I don’t know if I use the term “Bitchocracy”. It’s like, whoever bitches the hardest rules. But I use the term like that. And I was describing how like Anthony Albanese, when he gave your statements last week, he was like:

“Jews need to feel safe!”

And I was like, politicians didn’t used to talk like this, even back in the 2000s, where they talk about “feelings” like it’s a total like, feminisation of the language. Like you said, when you use the analogy of the primary school, that’s basically the level that public discourse is at now.

But it’s obviously very effective because when you move the discussion into feelings, then you don’t actually need to like, back it up with any kind of fairness or facts or whatever. It’s just like, I think I made the analogy on Twitter. Like, our relationship with the jews is like a shitty marriage where nothing you do is ever good enough and nothing they do you can never like, bring up. Otherwise you’re mean and you’re making them feel horrible and so on and so that’s what the jews want. They want to classify all criticism of their behaviour as “anti-semitism”. No criticism of jewish behaviour is tolerated, full stop, end of discussion!

But at the same time, they want to then dictate policy. They want to basically run society. How can you be in charge but then at the same time also demand zero criticism? And then play the victim, like:

“Oh, like, I can’t believe you would say that. That’s just like another ‘Holocaust’!”

You know, it’s ridiculous! But that’s literally the situation that we’re in, and that’s fundamentally unstable. Like, yeah, they’re trying to brute force it, but ultimately you need to rule with carrots and sticks.

And at the moment it’s all stick and no carrot. And jews don’t know how to rule. Just it’s like having a single mom. Single moms don’t know how to raise young boys because they don’t understand how to, they don’t have that innate ability basically to know when to basically go hard and when to go soft. If you are just constantly, when you’re raising a child, I mean, I’m not a father, but this is obviously true. If you’re just constantly super strict and just like being like:

“Don’t do this, don’t do that!”

And constantly like bitching and moaning and everything that they do, they’re not going to take any of it that seriously because it’s no matter what they do, you’re just reacting in the same way. And it’s really more, …

Blair Cottrell: Dogs are the same. If you keep giving dogs incessant stupid commands, they stop listening to anything.

Joel Davis: Frivolous. They don’t take you seriously.

If you want to instil fear in a population, you wait until you’re very upset about something. You have your red lines and then you get really angry! But otherwise you’re chill. And that’s how you, that’s how people respect your rules. Because they know, like, okay, those are the red lines, they’re very clear.

But this is the complete opposite. In our society today, all the lines are ambiguous. All these new laws that they’re bringing in, they have all these ambiguous definitions. There’s all these double standards and triple standards based upon feelings:

“Well, if this group does it, it makes this group of people feel upset and they’re victims for this reason. And so we have to care about this, but when the roles are reversed or like, …”

It’s just retarded! So there’s no legitimacy or coherence to any of this. All they’re going to do is push people into more sympathy to our position when we call it out.

But I will say:

Secondarily, the main reason why the Left is winning and the conservatives are losing in general., … The jewish issue is different. On the jewish issue, the conservatives are even deeper up the arsehole of the jews than the Left, frankly. The jews completely just own the conservative movement. It’s grotesque! But on every other issue, on these issues of free speech and political correctness and wokeness and anti-White double standards and so on the conservative attitude is always, … Because in politics you got a Left-wing position, a Right-wing position, and everything that happens is centrism. You never get what the far-Left and the far-Right want, never actually happens. Within a democracy, everything that happens is always, is always basically at the centre, in perpetuity.

Now what Left-wingers do is they run away from the centre towards the most radical Left-wing position they can possibly go for. And what that does is it then stretches the Overton Window and then the centre then shifts towards the Left. What Right-wingers do is go, hey, or conservatives, I should say is:

“Oh, hey, the centre always wins. So let’s go and jump in the centre and occupy the centre and be like, we’re the reasonable people in the centre. We’re not like these fringe lunatics. And then we’ll win because the centre always wins.”

[49:42]

But what they do by jumping in the centre is they then push the centre away from them, in between them and wherever the Left is. And so when you chase the centre, you’re constantly chasing the centre and you’ll never grab it because you’re constantly pushing it away from yourself while you chase after it. You have to run away from the centre to drag it in your direction. That’s the basic mechanics of a liberal democracy.

And this is why they always lose. Even if they win, conservatives win most elections. Like Liberal Party was just in power for like a decade. There was a brief period where you had like Rudd and Gillard for a few years. Then you had Howard in charge for ages. If you go through Australian history, the conservatives pretty much are always in power. The Left barely gets power. But when the Left gets power, they completely change the entire country, initiate all these new reforms, and then the next conservatives are getting in, basically have the same policies and just like entrench them.

So even though the Right wins elections, the Left always wins on the issues, all the big issues. Unless it’s the jews. Then when it comes to the jews, then that goes out the window. Right?

But I want to bring the reason why I articulate that because I want to bring up this story. So we talked about Parminder Singh on the show last week, who is a Sikh guy who can’t speak English properly. Yeah, he speaks with this broken English. And he’s being run for the Upper House in the upcoming Western Australian election by One Nation. And a Twitter account popped up a few days ago just after I wrote my opinion piece in The Noticer, which by the way, go check it out. It’s called One Nation Goes Full Retard. [https://www.noticer.news/one-nation-goes-full-retard/] I articulated basically the state of things with the Parminder Singh issue earlier in the week, but now all this new stuff has come to light.

So this page dropped called Parminder Singh One Nation Exposed. This guy says he’s a disgruntled former One Nation candidate and member with direct information over the coming days on Rod Caddies, who is the leader of One Nation in Western Australia and Parminder Singh.

Now, what he exposed was this. Well, one of the things he exposed. So Parminder Singh has a company called Punjabi Properties, and you can see on the back of these shirts, which are official One Nation merchandise. Punjabi Properties is displayed all across the back of these shirts. So, like what? One Nation is now sponsored by Punjabi Properties? This is all happening while Pauline Hanson is posting about how we’ve got to end foreign ownership and immigration is too high and all this kind of stuff. Yes, he’s posting here about how Rod Caddies is blocking everyone. He blocked me. He’s blocking all of everyone who’s asking questions. He’s not going to take accountability for his actions.

Blair Cottrell: Who is Rod Caddies?

Joel Davis: The guy who runs One Nation in Western Australia.

Blair Cottrell: Right.

Joel Davis: He put up a video. I think maybe he put up the video actually, after we did it on the show last week. I’ll pull up that video soon. And in that video, he basically wheeled this Parminder guy out to explain that he agreed. No, he agrees with all of Pauline Hanson’s policies, even though we’ve got him on record saying the exact opposite, even as like earlier this year on his Facebook account.

And also he ran for office. When he ran for office in local government, I believe Canberra, which level of government it was. When he ran without the One Nation endorsement, one of his policies was “repopulating rural areas with immigrants”. His policy was to bring immigrants into country towns to help build up their population. That doesn’t sound like anti-immigration to me. It sounds like the exact opposite. And he actually reiterated that statement on his Facebook account in his customary tortured, broken English with terrible grammar. It barely makes sense, but you could at least get that’s what he was saying. He also defended the student visa thing, saying:

“Oh, well, if we don’t bring students in on student visas, how are universities going to make money?”

And when he was talking to What’s News on a video that we watched in the show last week on a phone interview, he was like:

“Oh, Indian immigrants are good because they bring money into Australia.”

And he even made the point that:

“Oh, well, White Australians they don’t want to work hard enough. They don’t want to work on weekends, they don’t want to work 80 to 100 hour weeks. They expect to be paid over $30 an hour.”

And this is why they, …

Blair Cottrell: Need to give this perspective. He actually did say that? He said he thinks Australians are lazy because they won’t work 100 hours a week. 100 hours a week is over 14 hours per day, every day of the week. That’s the idea of a normal working week for this dude who’s running now Western Australia, in One Nation as a candidate.

[54:22]

Joel Davis: This is like the slave mentality of Indians. This is why the globalists, the big business, the jews, that’s why they want to bring Indians into, or one of the reasons why they want to bring them in. I mean, for some groups like far-Left and the jews, they just want to replace us out of like racial animus towards the White race. But from a business standpoint, one of the reasons they want to bring it in, and from a political standpoint is because they’re a slave race.

You know, every time I’ve had a conversation, unfortunately in my life, when I’ve been subjected to Indians through my employment, whenever I’ve had the misfortune of having to make small talk with them, all they talk about is how to make money and how to spend money. That’s literally the substance of everything that they want to talk about every single time! They have purely economic mindset, like, of a slave. They don’t have like a sense of freedom, a sense of like higher spirituality or any of these things that White people have. A sense of high dignity or honour or any of these things. And so that makes them easier to rule.

That’s why we could show up to India during the British Empire with, 200,000 Anglos and run their whole continent of like hundreds of millions of slave browns. And we did it for hundreds of years and it was easy, because they’re a pathetic race. And this is why they want to bring them in because they’ll accept shitty conditions and they’ll work long hours and they’ll work three different jobs because all they care about is money and the quality of life in India sucks! It’s still better than back home and this is great for big business, but it’s depressing your wages and destroying your quality of life. And that’s the whole point of voting One Nation right? They’re the one party that’s going to shut down the borders and stop this shit! But now they’re running this guy.

Blair Cottrell: That’s exactly why the financial sector lobbies the major parties to bring in as many Indians as possible because they’ll live in little Jeet boxes, as Joel calls them. They’ll work for less and they’ll work longer hours. And all big business cares about is people working more for less.

Obviously the quality of the goods being produced isn’t going to be as good, but they don’t care about that. People are going to still have to buy it if they’re the only ones offering it.

So, yeah, it is all just about replacing the Australian working class with a more manageable slave race. I’ve been saying that for years, actually. What do you think Tom? Do you think they have souls? Do you think Indians have souls?

Thomas Sewell: I do.

Joel Davis: We’re going deep here.

Thomas Sewell: I do. But I believe that souls aren’t really a binary. I believe that they’re a spectrum. So I believe dogs have souls. So of course Indians would have them as well, but they’re just not very large, they’re not very high. Yeah, they’ve got a very mediocre soul. There would be maybe one in a million that would have a very high soul, like a high Aryan soul. White people have huge potential in their soul, but they don’t use it. White people are like the stereotype of the talented person that never uses what they have. White people don’t, …

Blair Cottrell: They’re just capable of so much, … Has Tom cut out or have I cut out?

Joel Davis: Yeah, Tom’s frozen up for me.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, he’ll be back.

Joel Davis: His connection was a little bit dodgy before. Hopefully he gets it sorted. While we’re waiting for him to figure that out. Oh, you’re back Tom?

Blair Cottrell: I like hearing these takes, though. I like hearing these deep esoterics.

Joel Davis: He still seems kind of frozen up there.

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Am I back? Can you hear me?

Joel Davis: You’re back.

Thomas Sewell: We’re in the first world country of Australia. I pay the top rate for the Internet.

Blair Cottrell: Apparently the NBN maintenance crew is Indian now as well.

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think One Nation has been taking tips or the NBN have been taking tips from One Nation on their hiring policies. You know, they got the $25 an hour Jeets doing maintenance.

Anyway, …

Thomas Sewell: Infrastructure will fall apart in our lifetime. I guarantee everyone that.

I mean, I have friends in South Africa and they tell me that you may as well live rurally as long as you’re protected. Because in the cities there’s just constant blackouts. There’s just constant infrastructure issues. Yeah. With what Elon Musk is doing with the Starlink, it doesn’t matter whether you’re rural or in the city anymore.

So the infrastructure is garbage! I can’t believe how much the Internet drops out. But back on topic, prior to your question about whether Indians have souls or not, just the blatant, it’s like some strange form of corruption I’ve never personally seen., …

Blair Cottrell: He’s gone again. That’s really frustrating. He was going to say something good. He was about to say, …

Joel Davis: He was cucking. Yeah. It’s annoying.

Thomas Sewell: This is a pain in the ass.

Joel Davis: Be back.

Thomas Sewell: What an absolute pain in the ass.

Joel Davis: I don’t know.

Thomas Sewell: I’m gonna drop off. I’ll just make my last point. But the Internet is just intolerable and you guys are all blurry for me. I thought it was your Internet’s playing up. And I was like, sweet, my Internet’s fine. And then I clicked on the stream. I was like:

“Oh, it’s actually me!”

Joel Davis: I’m gonna blame ZOG.

Thomas Sewell: It’s just excellent! It’s excellent to see that One Nation. This won’t be forgiven. Especially in WA [West Australia]. It might be forgiven in the rest of the country because Noticer News is not Sky News yet, but one day it will be.

Thomas Sewell: But in WA, this is not going to be forgiven. And it’s good to see that it even led to or impacted or pressured the one sitting MP or Senator to actually drop off. I don’t know if that’s been covered on the stream yet, but I saw that recently as well.

[1:00:26]

Joel Davis: No, I was gonna bring that up Yeah. Is he gone again?

Blair Cottrell: Seems that way.

Joel Davis: The elusive Sewell. Yeah, I think ZOG have taken him out. You’ve taken out our boy. We’re gonna have to ride this one, the two of us.

Blair Cottrell: We have to keep marching forward, guys! We have to keep going. There’s going to be casualties.

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, yeah, we’ve got to keep moving forward.

So I’m going to go through. I’m going to like unpack all the details to fill everybody in on some of the updates to the Parmindergate, if you will, and then we’ll do some analysis.

So this flyer came out. So there was a video which I will pull up in a second. And in the video Parminder Singh was Rod Caddie’s, the guy who runs One Nation WA, he got Parminder Singh on and said:

“There’s a lot of people online that are spreading all this misinformation saying that Parminder Singh is pro-immigration. And I’ve got him here to say that no, he’s not got those views.”

And basically Parminder Singh just more or less said:

“I read all the One Nation policies on Pauline Hanson’s website and I agree with the policies.”

He didn’t actually like articulate anything specific about him agreeing with those policies or why he agrees with those policies, which kind of gives itself to the accusation that he’s a grifter, basically. That he’s identified One Nation as the biggest party that is stupid enough to give him the nomination.

Because if he tried to rock up to the Liberals or whatever and throw around his curry shop money, it wouldn’t go very far. The Liberals are getting that big like jew money coming in from the property developer jews and the banks and all the rest of it. So they wouldn’t be interested. He doesn’t have that kind of high roller money.

If he went to the Labor Party. Well, the Labor Party they would run Indians, but they’ll run Indians that can speak English properly, that have been to university. They’re actually a serious professional political outfit to a degree.

And so I don’t know how big the Greens are at WA but again, they’re going to run people that actually are ideologically competent. This guy can barely string three sentences together that make any sense. Like he has like a really superficial understanding. He’s probably got like an 80, 80 to 85 IQ. Like he’s not smart, he’s not well educated, he’s not a good speaker. And so anyway, the next option then is One Nation. That’s the fourth biggest party. And he’s obviously bought his way in. There’s a it’s alleged that he made a twenty thousand dollar donation which sounds like nothing. If that’s all it costs to buy your way into One Nation maybe we should try and like do a GoFundMe to like buy the nomination for Blair or something! [chuckling] Because we could crowdfund that from you guys in like two days.

Blair Cottrell: No, they wouldn’t take it. They’re too concerned about optics to take me.

Joel Davis: Yeah, they’re too concerned about optics to take you. A well spoken White Australian that people actually like that’s actually a nationalist, but they will take some fat hairy Sikh that can barely speak English correctly and can barely articulate what policies he supports.

Anyway, he put out this document here. It says down the bottom authorized by Parminder Singh.

So this is put out on behalf of One Nation from his office and it says here:

“We want One Nation not a divided nation.”

And the key beliefs:

“Key belief one, support for immigrants.”

You know, immigrants are great basically:

“Key belief two, balanced immigration. One Nation is not anti-immigration but we recognise allowing too many people in too quickly constrained services.”

This is a really big watering down of One Nation’s policies from:

“Immigration is causing a housing crisis. We need to cut it down to Net Zero.”

Like when Pauline first got elected to Parliament she gave a speech saying:

“We’re in danger of getting flooded by Asians. We’re losing our culture.”

Now look at One Nation. They’re being cucked by some curry shop owner. Apparently as well, it says here:

“All the One Nation WA merchandise at events had a logo on the back that said Punjabi Properties. The logo is bigger than the One Nation logo. Ask anyone who attended the event in Mandurah November 9th. And the food at the event was curry supplied by Parminder Singh’s curry company or restaurant.”

So you go down to the One Nation rally. Look at all these White Boomers. They’re going down to the One Nation rally because you know there’s too many immigrants coming into this country and they want something done about it. And they get given their One Nation shirt with Punjabi Properties on the back and served curry!

Blair Cottrell: That’s [chuckling] bad!

Joel Davis: And then some fat Sikh gets up there and speaks in broken English and doesn’t even understand the policies of the party that he’s joined. That’s the state of One Nation! That’s the state of One Nation. I mean like it’s bad!

Blair Cottrell: Sad!

Joel Davis: This is levels of cuckservatism previously not thought possible. I mean it’s not even competent cuckservatism. It’s just embarrassing. What I said on my opinion piece was its actually more respectable if they were paid off to run this guy. It was purely a financial decision. If they thought this was a good idea on any metric, that’s actually more embarrassing than just being like shills. In my opinion, that’s how bad this guy is.

[1:06:03]

Blair Cottrell: Well, I was just going to ask you a question. Do you think they’re foreseeing an increase in the Indian population and they want a piece of that they can see that a lot of that’s going to go towards either Liberal or Labor and the strategy is:

“We need a piece of the Indian voting bloc that’s going to be set up in Australia.”

Already is being set up in Australia by the other parties. Has it got something to do with that. What do you think?

Joel Davis: It can’t be for the Indian voting block. They’re not that significant of a voting block. And the reality is, I mean we’ve done, …

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know man, there’s a lot of Indians in India. How many Indians are in India?

Joel Davis: But I’m talking about here.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but they’re going to keep coming in. There’s going to be hundreds of thousands every few months. It’s going to end up being millions.

Joel Davis: One Nation’s supposed to be stopping them from coming in. Isn’t that the whole, …!

Blair Cottrell: They’re not! They must be thinking:

“Well they’re going to come anyway, we might capitalise on it anyway.”

Joel Davis: The majority of Indians, … They have done the studies. They vote Labor and then Labor are going and making deals saying:

“We’re going to bring in shitloads of Indians and we love Indians!”

And then Liberals come out and say:

“We love Indians just as much as Labor, actually!”

And they’re going and making deals with the Indians and so on.

So why is One Nation? Is it really think that it’s going to convince the Indian community:

“Hey, we’re the anti-immigration party that everyone calls racist and everyone in the party, everyone who votes for us are all like one White bogans.”

Or whatever according to the common, …

Blair Cottrell: Just trying to make sense of it.

Joel Davis: Vote for us instead! Like we’ve done the studies, we’ve gone through them on the show. Like the majority of Australians want immigration cut. They want immigration lowered, and they don’t have anyone to vote for basically except One Nation to do that.

So One Nation, if they sell themselves as the anti-immigration party. Well yeah, okay, Indians are coming in but over fucking 70% of voters are White! So selling “keep the Indians out to White voters” and WA has got a higher than 70% White ratio. I think it’s like almost 80% White. So trying to sell an anti-immigration message to White voters, people that actually vote for you, do you think that should be the priority? Not trying to market yourself to the 4% of the population that’s Indian that’s already voting for your political enemies that don’t like your policies anyway. That’s just fucking retarded politics! Like, it’s insane!

This is what I was saying before about like conservatives running to the centre to try and occupy the centre, but the centre escapes them. Like One Nation’s job is to run away from the centre and to stretch the discourse out, force the Liberals to justify themselves. Like the Liberals right now, the majority of Liberal voters want immigration cut, but the Liberals are avoiding the issue.

One Nation, if they did a proper anti-immigration campaign and sold themselves the true Right-wing party that’s going to shut down the borders, they’d get shitloads of votes that’d be very popular. But no, they want to try and prove how not racist they are by running some fat Indian. And he was the guy, by the way, we talked about on the show when Pauline went to the Sikh temple over in Perth. It was this guy’s Sikh temple. He organised all that. Pauline in that head scarf, turban thing.

Blair Cottrell: He must have given him more than 20 grand. It must have been more than 20 grand! He must have given him something else.

Joel Davis: I hope so, because it’s embarrassing, man! It’s embarrassing!

Blair Cottrell: It seems like he’s bought out the whole party. That’s what it seems like.

Joel Davis: Yeah. In WA at least. And people were saying:

“Oh, it’s not Pauline’s fault because it’s the WA wing of the party and they don’t control it.”

But it’s like that’s bullshit! She controls it.

Blair Cottrell: It’s her party. She’s ultimately in charge of everything that happens. She should just pull the pin on him. She should just pull the pin on him and say:

“Get rid of this guy. What’s he talking shit for about wanting more Indians? We’re against that. People are voting for us because we’re against that. Get rid of this guy!”

Why can’t you do that, Pauline? That’s what everyone’s waiting for.

Joel Davis: The party’s literally called Pauline Hanson’s One Nation. Like her name’s in the name of the party. Like, you know what I mean?

Anyway, I’ll pull this video up for everyone’s viewing benefit. This is what I was describing before. This is that Rod Caddies joke who runs WA One Nation. A lot of nationalists have spoken to me privately, by the way, who were involved in Western Australian One Nation and they hate this guy. Like, this guy and others involved have been advocating for moderating and cucking for years. And alienating a lot of the true nationalists in the party over there. Cucking to the Aboriginals, now cucking to the jeets. I mean it’s embarrassing! But anyway, I’ll play this for everyone’s benefit.

Rod Caddies: Hey guys, just wanted to jump on here and have a chat with Parminder. I mean there’s been a few things put around on social media lately about immigration and how Parminder wants to flood our country with Indians and I know for a fact that’s not true, but I wanted to show you guys and let you have a listen to Parminder for himself and where he stands with One Nation and immigration.

Parminder: So hi everyone. Before I joined the One Nation party, I read the all policies, whatever the Pauline stand for and I fully support the Net Zero the immigration policy. And if some people lucky enough to come here, I request all those people that respect the Australian culture, Australian values and Australian constitution. And the English is my third language. So and I try to make a videos, that’s why it’s a little bit like I think in my own language first, then I speak in English. So that’s why it’s bit slow. So I [word unclear] One Nation policies.

Rod Caddies: So there you have it.

[1:11:50]

Blair Cottrell: Wow! I mean he just said something I’ve always said and it’s something. Hang on one minute, I’ve got music playing and I shouldn’t have music playing, stupid. I’ve always said that you’ve got to be careful when dealing with foreign people because even though they may learn your language and churn out sentences in some form of your language, they’re thinking in their own language and they have words and phrases for things that we don’t even conceptualise often, especially if they come from a more mercantile, ruthless kind of society and culture. So he just basically admitted that in that video. He’s like:

“I’m thinking in my own language but then I’m speaking in yours. So what I’m actually thinking, who knows? You’ve just got to trust me guys!”

That’s [chuckling] pretty heavy stuff.

Joel Davis: The excuse that he used is that he’s incapable of articulating his true beliefs correctly because he can’t speak English properly. How does that qualify you to be a politician in Australia if you’re incapable of articulating yourself correctly in the language that Australians speak? That’s immediately disqualifying, immediately! Like it’s ridiculous!

But secondarily what he said there, like the grammar’s horrible, like “I supported the Pauline” and so on, like it’s embarrassing! But as he was describing, he’s like:

“I fully support the policies of One Nation.”

Now we’ve got all of these statements that he’s made that are contrary to those policies on immigration. So he’s changed his mind. Doesn’t he owe us an explanation for why he changed his mind? Because he’s acting like, as if, it’s not like he’s always had these views. He’s just signed up to this party that has different policies than what he’s advocated before in his public statements and his previous attempts at being an independent politician. So you would owe us an explanation for why you changed your mind and why we can trust you now.

But instead, what this was just like, wheel him out, say he agrees, tell everyone to shut up, gaslight everyone, and then just block everyone on Twitter that’s saying the opposite. I mean, absolute PR disaster for One Nation! Good work to all the boys putting pressure on. I tried to do my bit to force this kind of reaction. And then what we saw today, and, …

Blair Cottrell: Absolutely! And that video, let me interject quickly, is a direct response to the pressure you guys have been putting on these people. So it goes to show how influential we are as a community. They have to play ball with us because we are the people who vote for One Nation. We used to be anyway, people watching this video, that was supposed to be the Nationalist Party. So good effort for everyone or good effort by everyone putting the pressure on as a result of this stupid decision.

Joel Davis: Yeah, I see a Superchat from Ukrainian groiper saying, “Naan Nation”*. That’s pretty funny.

[* Naan (Asian flatbread) Naan is a leavened, oven-baked or tawa-fried flatbread, that can also be baked in a tandoor. It is characterised by a light and fluffy texture and golden-brown spots from the baking process. Naan is found in the cuisines of Iran, Central Asia, South Asia, Southeast Asia, and the Caribbean. Composed of White or wheat flour and combined with a leavening agent, typically yeast, naan dough develops air pockets that contribute to its fluffy and soft texture.]

But anyway, so this is the article in The Noticer just dropped just before we went live:

“Western Australia’s only One Nation MP suddenly quits the party.”

This is Ben Dawkins. He presumably joined the One Nation party to keep the likes of Parminder out of the country. Like that’s the whole point of One Nation. It’s an anti-immigration party.

https://www.noticer.news/ben-Dawkins-quits-one-nation-western-Australia/

Anyway:

“He’s been a member for the southwest region since March 2023 and is according to The Noticer, pro-freedom and anti-woke. He formally tended his resignation from Pauline Hanson’s party on Tuesday, saying on Thursday that he made the decision ‘reluctantly’. His resignation comes amid controversy over One Nation selection of Sikh businessman Parminder Singh as the third Upper House candidate in Western Australia due to his support for mass immigration from India.”

And this is like the original video. By the way. Go check out this article on the Noticer dot News. It’s the number one article at the moment because he just got put out.

And then you can watch this video by What’s News here where he interviews Parminder Singh on the phone and you can hear for yourself of what he said. The quotes here from Mr. Dawkins:

“I hold Pauline Hanson in high regard as a courageous advocate for everyday Australians. Indeed, Pauline Hanson’s One Nation should be the party with the guts to say what you’re thinking. As an independent candidate, I will continue to have the courage to speak for those who feel unheard.”

Blah, blah, blah. Who’s obviously amicably leaving the party. But the fact that he’s decided to quit right now, I mean, what other reason could it possibly be? Surely he’s quitting because of this. Surely this is the final straw. What do you think Blair?

Blair Cottrell: All we can do is speculate about that. I’m sure I don’t know the man, I can’t speak to his motivations.

[1:16:26]

Joel Davis: Yeah. Someone says here:

“Joel, with all due respect, this is like saying that a dog owes us an explanation for chewing issues. He’s a fresh off the boat jeet. There isn’t any explanation. He couldn’t articulate one in English regardless.”

Well, yeah, I mean, what I was articulating.

Blair Cottrell: We don’t care about his explanation. We want an explanation from Pauline Hanson. What’s going on with the party?

Joel Davis: Yes.

Blair Cottrell: They’re supposed to represent the Australian people. That’s what we’re waiting for.

Joel Davis: Yeah, like how are you going to keep immigrants out of Australia if you can’t even keep them out of your own party? I mean, it’s pretty basic.

But keep the pressure up, all of you on Twitter. Every time Pauline Hanson tweets, Malcolm Roberts tweets, any of these other One Nation accounts from anywhere in the country, get in the replies, post the links to all this stuff, keep the pressure up, keep asking the question and just keep making it a nuisance for them because they need to, as you said, they owe us an explanation. We are nationalism in this country. You need to explain yourself to us!

I saw some rumours coming out that the Libertarian Party’s immigration platform is not going to be too crash hot. Then I asked some people that I knew in those circles and they said:

“No, actually it’s going to be better than he says.”

Or whatever. I said:

“You guys have to get your immigration policy together and you need to come out and you need to explain to us nationalists why it’s better than One Nation’s.”

And they said:

“Yeah, we’re going to do that.”

So we’ll see if they cuck or don’t cuck. We’ll cover it live. We’ll break it down. Will they end up bringing out a policy better than one nations? I don’t know. I’m sceptical. They’ve got elements in the party that seem not to care as much about immigration as an issue as others. We will see who wins out. We’ll see when the formal policy comes, comes forward.

But you know, One Nation’s in danger here. If the Libertarians put out a good immigration policy that’s better than theirs, they’re going to steal their votes off them and deservedly. So and if the Libertarians don’t put out a good immigration policy, I’m not going to advocate for voting for One Nation while they’re running these jeets. There’s no fucking way, there’s no fucking way! I’m going to be telling all of our audience to not vote. If our vote has to be earned. And at the moment, none of these Jokers are earning it. Like, none of them are taking this issue, even like a quarter of percent seriously compared to what they should be taking it. This is an existential issue. Our nation is being destroyed. And it’s also the number one issue destroying the average Australian’s quality of life. The housing crisis, wage stagnation, et cetera. Immigration is being rammed down the throat of this country by big business interests, big corporate interests, big finance interests, so that they can keep making ridiculous profits while in an economy that’s faltering. We’ve been in a per capita recession every quarter for the last, you know, two years basically. Australia’s fucking! Everything is getting worse on every level and immigration is the reason why.

So the average Joe on the street definitely wants the border shut down, definitely wants something done.

Blair Cottrell: What about those people who are saying:

“No, it’s not immigration, it’s landlords putting up property prices. It’s capitalism, it’s greedy capitalists, that’s what’s destroying Australia!”

How do you respond to that? It’s not immigrants, it’s capitalists!

Joel Davis: Well, the way that I would respond to that is simple.

Number one, these big capitalist lobby groups, like the property developer lobby, the finance lobby, the big corporate industry lobbies, they ask the government, they fund the political campaigns of the major parties and they demand higher immigration. Their public representatives that they pay to come and advocate for their interests want more immigration.

So when they say it’s not immigration, it’s the capitalists, it’s like, well the big capitalists are the ones that are deciding that they want the immigration. So you can’t actually divide the two things from one another. This is ridiculous! Like the capitalists are telling us immigration is good for them, so it must be good for them.

And if you have a Marxist worldview where you believe that the capitalists make profits under the exploitation of the working class, well everything the capitalists do driven by that profit motive must be to exploit the working class, including the fact that they’re pumping all this money into politics to keep immigration high, against the public will. Because it’s not the Democratic will. We’ve seen the polls, we’ve gone through them on the show every time they do one, every time they do a poll on immigration is wildly unpopular. So liberal and Labor don’t have the immigration policies they do because of what their voters want. They have it because it’s what their donors want. And their donors are the big capitalists. So it’s just a complete non-starter of an argument.

Blair Cottrell: Would it be fair to say that shutting down discussion on immigration on the grounds that it’s “racist” is protecting the profits of the capitalists?

Joel Davis: Absolutely! 100%! It’s not even in question.

Blair Cottrell: That really throws a spanner in the works, doesn’t it? I wonder what came first, the chicken or the egg? Did the capitalists dream up this whole anti-racist movement and use it to usher in this new slave class that’s going to live in smaller spaces, work long hours and for less, like for lower wages? Or have they just kind of adjusted themselves to that culture that already established itself as a result of subversion? I would lean towards the second scenario.

[1:22:10]

Joel Davis: I think it almost doesn’t really matter! What matters from our standpoint is going to Leftists and saying:

“You claim to be against capitalism, yet the social values that you put forward are the social values of the big capitalists.”

The big capitalists are fine with gay marriage and they support transgenderism and they support mass immigration and all the rest of it. They support political correctness, they support wokeness.

So if they support all of those things, clearly all of those things are compatible with capitalism. Clearly all of those things are beneficial to capitalist power. Otherwise why would they support them? And we can actually explain why they benefit from capitalist power. Because what those things do is they destroy the fabric of the nation, they destroy national loyalty, they destroy patriotism.

And that’s why Leftists attacked them. Because Leftists decided after World War II that, well, probably earlier, but they particularly decided this after World War II, that nationalism was their main enemy. Nationalism, National Socialism, fascism, that whole suite of ideas, that’s their main enemy. And that was more important, fighting that was more important to them than advocating for the working class.

In fact, a lot of Leftist theorists said:

“Well, the White working class betrayed us because they supported National Socialism and fascism. So fuck the White working class! We’re going to replace them with a brown and black working class and a gay working class and so on, that will support communism.”

So they made the decision that destroying nationalism was more important than destroying capitalism. And capitalists then looked at the world and said:

“You know what? The biggest threat to us actually isn’t communism, its nationalism.”

And you can see that in World War II. Because in World War II the Liberal capitalist West allied with the Soviet Union to destroy National Socialist Germany. So clearly they made a decision then that they were more threatened by National Socialism than Communism, otherwise they wouldn’t have allied with one against the other. That’s just a brute fact of history that communists and Leftists cannot argue away. That’s reality.

[Capitalism and Communism are both jewish systems so their co-operation, both overtly or covertly, is natural-K]

Then they then set upon systematically funding and supporting the destruction of nationalism and anything approximating nationalism in every Western country under their control.

So why would capitalists want to do this? Well, nationalism is the greatest threat to an international market system because nationalists, when they come to power and they take over the government, they go and look at what’s happening in international markets and they say:

“Well, hey, wait a second, this capitalist over here is making a profit at the expense of my nation. He’s taken jobs to other countries, he’s importing goods from other countries and he’s doing all of these things that are good for him to make extra profits, but they’re actually bad for the strength of my nation. And so I’m going to start creating all these laws that protect local industries, keep wealth and resources in my country to build up the national strength, make sure there’s good jobs for my people.”

But international finance, they didn’t want to do that because at the end of the post-war globalisation that we’ve had, they wanted to go and exploit the cheap slave labour in China and other foreign third world countries and then import all that cheap crap into the West and sell it to us. And they took away all the manufacturing jobs.

Like back in the 1960s or the 1970s, over 30% of Australia’s economy was manufacturing. We used to make cars, we used to make computers, we used to make everything here. Now it’s only 6% of the economy, we make nothing here. And that’s one of the reasons why people are doing it tough. Because there isn’t good quality jobs for the working class anymore, because they sent all those jobs to foreign countries.

And the people that would stop that are nationalists, which is why they attack the White Australia Policy, which is why they attack nationalism, which is why they attack your identity. Because they don’t want White Australians supporting a political leader that’s loyal to them before he’s loyal to big business. All the biggest companies in this country, the top 20 countries, sorry, the top 20 companies in Australia are majority foreign owned. It’s all Wall Street, jewish banking firms and shit that own all of our shit! Like all of our shit has been sold to all these like foreign interests. Our country has been completely sold off. All the jobs have been shipped offshore. We had so much wealth in this country. We were one of the wealthiest countries per capita in the entire world. So much has been shipped overseas to the benefit of large corporate interests at your expense.

And if you had leaders that were nationalists like they used to be before World War II in Australia, who put White Australian people first, they wouldn’t have let that happen.

So that’s why they had to destroy that ideology to facilitate this. That’s what international finance wanted and that’s why the world that is run by international finance, these big capitalists, attack people like us and our ideas hard rather than the Left. They fear them less than us because we are the true enemy. And the Left is complicit. The Left attacks us harder than it attacks them even though they have the power and we don’t. So their entire worldview is bullshit! They’re complete frauds!

Blair Cottrell: What you seem to be saying there is the Left are larping as class communists, like they’re not actually against the bourgeoisie or the rich. They’re actually race communists, like race and race hate, punishing White people is at the centre of all of their politics.

[1:27:31]

Joel Davis: Yes! Yes, they care more. And we see this in their revealed preference. They care more about attacking us than they care about attacking capitalist power. Why is the Left, their number one focus is anti-fascism. Why isn’t anti-capitalism? Why aren’t they going after the enemy in a serious way? Because number one, that’s hard. Because you’re going after the people that are actually powerful! That’s what we do. And we get locked up in jail and we get dragged through courts and horrible things happen to us. People get fired from their jobs. When you go after the real power, real power goes after you!

Blair Cottrell: No bank accounts, no monetisation, no Patreon, no YouTube.

Joel Davis: Yeah. The only time the Left do anything that really goes after the power, serious power, is when they go after Israel.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And then they feel some consequences finally, for the first time in their lives.

Joel Davis: The only time they feel any consequences. And that also proves the other aspect of what we say, which is that capitalism is jewish! The capitalist elite, a lot of them are fucking jews!

And if you look at the history of capitalism, capitalism was developed, the entire logic and structure of capitalism was developed by basically jewish practices subverting medieval European society. We talked about this on the show a few weeks ago. Werner Sombart’s work, the book is called jews and Modern Capitalism. And Werner Sombert wasn’t just any old anti-semite or something. Werner Sombart was the greatest theorist of the German historical School of historical economics in the late 19th and early 20th century. He was a genius! He was a genius!

And as he was writing his work, basically trying to articulate the whole history of capitalism, how it came into existence and why, he realised that the jews played such an important role that he had to write a completely separate book just on the jews and their involvement in the development of capitalism. And in that book he describes how in medieval Europe, merchants had a completely different ethos.

So if you were a merchant in medieval Europe and you went out into the public square and you started praising your wares and talking about how great the stuff at your shop is and how low your prices are and all this kind of stuff, that was considered immoral. If you tried to get customers off the other shop owners, that was considered immoral. If you charge a different price than the other merchants, if you tried to like sell your stuff extra cheap, that was considered immoral. Everything had a set price. You sell it at that price. You don’t big up your goods. You are a Christian. The people who made it are Christians. Everyone should just trust that the quality is there, that’s that! There’s no Hoodwinking, there’s no marketing, there’s no manipulation that was permitted. There’s basically, it was just a fair, equitable system and it was completely mediated through charitable, good faith Aryan society.

Then the jews come in and the jews will come in, they’ll get. Jews had international networks. They they’re an “international clique” as Hitler described. They would be involved, particularly in early colonisation. They were going after the gold mines and the silver mines and stuff over in South America. But they were very involved in these international trade networks also all the trade networks that ran through the Middle East into Europe as well. And they were an international ethnicity, every other ethnic group was in one location. The jews had people everywhere.

So the jews could use the fact that they were one international group to build all these relationships with the other jewish merchants all around the world and to facilitate international trade.

And then, as a result, they could then import goods and bring them into your community and sell them cheaper than the stuff made in your local community. And they didn’t have laws against that kind of stuff back then or any kind of regulations back then, because it was an honour system.

And so they’d come in and they would sell stuff at half the price, and they’d destroy local industries. They’d be haggling people on the street trying to sell stuff. They’d be advertising their goods. This is why the jews took over the media, because the jews were the first people to get into advertising. It was considered immoral to advertise for Aryans. But jews didn’t have any issue with advertising.

And so they then got into that industry. And that the advertising industry is the backbone of the printing, you know, print media. Print media makes a lot of money off the advertising on the papers, in the newspaper. So as newspapers were invented in the early 18th century and widely distributed, jews played a leading role in financing a lot of that, because jewish merchants would advertise through those.

And then that gave them a lot of control over media and therefore public perception. But jews innovated in these industries, and so they were able to undercut the opposition. That’s why jews are getting kicked out of all these different cities and countries all across Europe all the time, because they would come in with their investment practices and destroy the livelihoods of local industries and local merchants, completely upset the whole apple cart of the local community. And eventually there would be enough public resentment that they’d run them out of the city and demand that they’d be kicked out of the city. And then they go to the next city and they do the same thing and so on. And the process kept repeating.

But eventually they were able to become normalised in Europe because they made so many deals with elite political actors and traitors that got in bed with these jewish merchants and were making a quick buck.

[1:33:18]

And I’m not even talking about usurious lending as well, which is a whole other aspect of this, that eventually jewish mercantile behaviour became normalised. And now it’s considered normal to have advertising. Now it’s considered normal to try and undercut and compete with other firms and try and sell things cheaper and import goods from all over the world.

And instead of like buying things from like local producers and you know, we’ve got this completely globalised, marketized, corporatized, consumerized society.

Now this all came from originally the impact of the jewish mentality and jewish culture on Aryan Middle Ages Europe. Without that maybe we wouldn’t live in this fucking shitscape. So capitalism is fundamentally and inherently jewish in a certain way. You could argue according to Sombard’s theories, which I think are really compelling, the history that he describes in that book.

But then secondarily we can see that jews are very, up to this day. Like I’ve talked about on the show before, how look at the property development industry which is a massive supporter of mass immigration because more immigrants means more demand for property. So they can build more high rise fucking ZOG [Zionist Occupied Government] slave high rise apartments and sell them for you 800 grand a pop like in some overcrowded part of like inner city Sydney or Melbourne or something. And a bunch of Asians and pajeets will buy them or want to rent them or whatever. And that’s a great business model for them. It doesn’t do anything for our country, it just clutters our cities, makes traffic worse, depresses wages with cheap labour and so on, but drives up the price of rent and all this kind of stuff. But for them it’s great! They’re making millions, they’re making billions.

And the biggest property developer in Australia is Harry Triguboff. The jew. And the jews have always been instrumental in high rise development in this country because before World War II we didn’t allow high rise development in Australia because our culture said if we have all these high rise apartments in the cities, what this is going to encourage people to do is to move in there, move out of their parents home when they’re in their 20s, move into one of these apartments in the city and they’re not going to have children, they’re not going to get married, they’re going to start having frivolous sex, they’re going to start developing this kind of cosmopolitan Left-wing culture, they’re going to become basically soy Jack Reddit libtard types. We don’t want that! That’s happened in Europe and it’s created all these revolutionary communist movements and it’s been a mess in Europe. We don’t want that in Australia.

The Australian dream is going to be we’re going to have, everyone is going to have their own quarter acre block and have their own home that you can fit a family in. And they’re going to get married young, they’re going to have children and they’re going to have a dignified existence and you can go and work at the factory before we send the jobs overseas and you can earn enough to be able to support a wife and three kids and so on.

And that’s how we’re going to build our society. It’s going to be healthy. The tallest building in town is going to be the Church. Nothing’s going to be bigger than the Church. No high rise development. Everyone’s going to have a backyard, everyone’s going to be out, kids playing outside, healthy, blah blah, blah. That was the great Australian dream. And the jews came in after World War II, started building high rise developments. The first high rise developments were in the jew areas of Sydney and Melbourne, in Bondi, in St Kilda.

The places that still to this day are where the jews live. That’s where the first high rise developments were. And they got money from their international jewish finance buddies to finance them because they have the international networks that give them low interest loans to then build their high rise developments. And this is where the money for a lot of these wealthy jewish families that are now controlling our government came from is from setting up shop, basically subverting our society, building these high rise developments, developing these giant corporations that now control our government and are forcing immigrants down our throat. And these have been a lot of the money that’s been behind multiculturalism and so on has come from these developments and they’ve completely subverted Australian society.

Now we do have these cosmopolitan communist Leftists that are like they don’t have any children and so on and live in the inner cities and perpetuate this Left-wing ideology, just like it was predicted.

And so you can see like the same jewish infection of our society, kind of like what I described in medieval Europe has happened here to create this current problem.

But a lot of people don’t know understand this or know about this, but this is just history, this is just how it works. So you know, when we’re talking about the problems with capitalism, it’s not just an abstract idea, we’re talking about fucking jews!

So anyway, I went on a bit of a tangent there, but I thought it was important.

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, you sometimes do that. I tend to try to just let you go. But it was all very good stuff. That’s the thing. It’s a lot to unpack for the average person. But because people can go back and they can re-watch it, they can replay these little segments. I think it’s all really good stuff. I’ve got to jet. I’ve got some responsibilities to see to. But it’s been a great stream so far. You’re gonna stay with it Joel, I suppose, and, …

[1:38:26]

Joel Davis: No. We’ll end it there.

Blair Cottrell: That’s okay. We can do some Superchats then. I can stick around for that, I suppose.

Joel Davis: All right. There’s not that many. Clever Name said:

“Never get to catch you live. The moustache needs a badge and some brutality to go with it. Solid 7 out of 10. Congrats on the little one.”

That’s obviously directed towards Tom. And I agree that Tom kind of has a cop physiognomy. Tom does kind of look like a cop in a way. Maybe in a healthy society, he would be a cop.

Blair Cottrell: Whoa, Are you talking about Thomas Sewell?

Joel Davis: Yeah. Don’t you think he kind of looks like a cop?

Blair Cottrell: Maybe with a moustache a little bit. But I always thought I could be a good cop if I was living in a society where that was feasible. Obviously, it’s not feasible now, …

Joel Davis: Like, seven years, … Cops that wear the aviators and …

Blair Cottrell: Well, you used to have to be a guy like me to be a cop. You have to be as big and as tall as me. They were like the basic physical standards to be a police officer because you had to command respect in the community. You had to be intimidating to a certain degree, but also respectable. So, like, my physiognomy was the one they used to go for. But now there’s all these equality you can’t discriminate, that kind of stuff.

So I wouldn’t last as a police officer because I wouldn’t be able to toe the line. I wouldn’t be swearing allegiance to feminism and the LGBT community. And so I’d quickly be shunned by the rest of the force.

But, yeah, once upon a time, I think I could have been a good cop.

Joel Davis: No, in a healthy society, yeah the NSN would be the cops and we’d keep the streets safe. You know, that story the other day of that fat nigger that raped that poor young girl, and they had the CCTV. I posted it, Noticer News posted as well, this fat, disgusting nigger!

And I think I said in the replies to when the mainstream news posted the video, looking for the suspect, I was like:

“Why the fuck do we have negroes in Australia? Like, why the fuck are they here?”

Like, if you just stop and think, like, take a step back.

Blair Cottrell: They are a bioweapon!

Joel Davis: Just think how ridiculous that is! Why the fuck are they here?

Blair Cottrell: They are bioweapons!

Joel Davis: Why did we build planes and boats and transport fucking savage rapist beasts halfway across the fucking world into our country? You know, give them like Centerlink bucks and like feed them full of KFC hormones and just let them roam the streets, like with no supervision, like not even putting them in a cage or anything! They can just roam the streets! It’s like, what next? Like chimpanzees, lions? What other wildlife are going to bring from Africa? I mean, it’s fucking insane!

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, no comment. We want to start with the Superchats. We’ve got a few from Rumble. We’ve got the Shogun 21. Thanks very much:

“Violence prevails when democracy fails.”

Said Molotov Solution:

“If you enjoy metal and are red pilled, they are a must listen.”

Oh, it must be a band, Molotov Solution.

All right, Molotov Solution. It sounds interesting. I’m actually I won’t talk about that.

Anyway, next is Ukrainian groiper, sends through 10 bucks. You went through that one already, “Naan Nation”. Yeah. And Fellow Comrade, regular supporter of the show, sends through $10. Thanks, mate. He says:

“I wonder if the face mask ban will cover people wearing Groucho Marx glasses as a disguise?”

Maybe, but they said one of the reasons given for banning the face masks was it was protecting people from capsicum spray, which I don’t think face masks do very well.

Joel Davis: No, they don’t work.

Blair Cottrell: You need to have like a full gas mask with like airtight goggles to protect your eyes. It burns your skin too. Like, so it’s not really. It incapacitates you. I’ve been hit by mace once at a fair distance too. And it doesn’t matter who you are, that stuff incapacitates you for 10 minutes.

Joel Davis: If you have good goggles, you can deal with it. Like it’s kind of real spicy and that’s not great! But, excuse me. [coughing] Thinking of capsicum spray just like fucked me up then.

But if you have good goggles that keep it out of your eyes, it’s tolerable. It’s tolerable. It’s like eating like fuck loads of chilies or something. Like, if it gets in your nose or whatever, unless you get like straight in your mouth or something, then obviously.

Blair Cottrell: Do you like spicy food, Joel? Do you like spicy food? Is that your thing?

Joel Davis: Yeah, to an extent, but I’m not like, crazy about it. You know what I mean?

Blair Cottrell: I love the stuff.

Joel Davis: I mean, yeah.

Blair Cottrell: I don’t look like he sort of guy who would like spicy food, but I can’t get enough of it. Makes me salivate just thinking about spicy food.

Joel Davis: I’m not a huge fan of the Indian, maybe it’s just I’m so racist. I can’t bring myself to enjoy Indian food, but, …

Blair Cottrell: I don’t eat Indian. Indian curries are just created to disguise the fact that the meat is off and really poor quality. That’s why Indians curried their food. They didn’t have refrigeration for a long time. So Indian cuisine is just rotten, poor quality food mixed in slop to disguise how bad it actually is. Like, I don’t know why people go to Indian restaurants. The fact that Indian restaurants even exist is ridiculous! I don’t know.

[1:43:55]

Joel Davis: Yeah. I mean first of all, the premise, an Indian is going to cook you dinner? Doesn’t matter what they’re making, that’s fucked! Anyway, Mexican food. I don’t mind the burrito, but from what I understand the burrito that as we understand it, is actually an American invention that’s White people improving Mexican cuisine and like upgrading it from, like, schlop to something like, actually edible.

So that’s not really a Mexican thing. It’s like fake Mexican. Tex Mex. I think it’s Texan. So, …

Blair Cottrell: Aussie autist 88 sends through five bucks. Thanks, mate. He says:

“Happy midsummer. It’s two days time.”

Oh, someone knows. I won’t divulge anything about that. There’s nothing crazy going on. It’s just like a little private Christmas party.

But yeah, you guys might see some photos of that after the fact. We’ll see.

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, Midsummer’s good to celebrate. We don’t celebrate it properly in Australia because unlike the Europeans, it’s like so close to Christmas where the Europeans is like the opposite side of the year.

Blair Cottrell: So. Hang on, isn’t Midsummer that movie. Is that the name of the movie?

Joel Davis: I’m sure there’s a movie called Midsummer I can’t think of, …

Blair Cottrell: I was thinking of the direct Shakespeare’s, …

Joel Davis: The Midsummer’s Night Dream. That’s like a play.

Blair Cottrell: No. Okay, well I was thinking of our Christmas party in two days time which has a Midsummer dress theme. I might as well just give it away now.

Joel Davis: Dude OPSEC! OPSEC [Operations Security]! We can’t be divulging our private, … On our online show.

Blair Cottrell: It’s just a dress code. [chuckling] Who cares like whatever. I hope we get some photos.

Joel Davis: We don’t. I don’t know what you’re talking about.

Blair Cottrell: I’m just excited about it. I’ve already bought my get up and I’m excited!

Joel Davis: Why don’t we like go through our criminal records again on stream? And go through all the horrible things, …

Blair Cottrell: Well okay, where do I begin? [chuckling]

Joel Davis: [chuckling] And then on Odysee I got a Superchat from Clever Name. Oh no, I already read that one. On Entropy I’ve got a Superchat from the Gump. He said:

“White people need to start to favour our own kind in business. That’s the only way to generate and keep resources in our group interests. Big contracts, fundings, positions. They all have diversity requirements to weaken us.”

Well I agree with that. Insofar as you can do business with Whites and work with Whites and so on, you always should. You absolutely should! And I think that’s quite clear and obvious a good thing to do. Personally I hate working with non-Whites, and your goal should be to work with them as little as possible, and if possible not at all do business with them. Not at all if you can. But I understand that a lot of industries it’s unavoidable so it is what it is for some people. But that should be your objective.

But also yeah like if you can source your produce from like local farmers, if you can get milk from local farmers, eggs from local farmers, etc. Meat is like not only is it going to be high quality and better for you, better for your health but also that’s so much better than going down to like you know the ZOG options of Woolies or Coles and like dumping your money into some foreign jew owned you know megacorp that is importing half the from overseas and injecting the other half of the with fucked up hormones that are bad for your health and screwing over Australian farmers etc. Etc. So yeah definitely always try and do your business locally and within the race.

But I think that’s more or less all the Superchats.

So thanks for watching the show this evening. It’s been a good chill stream. Unfortunately, Tom. Yeah suffered ZOG DDoS attacks and they took him out. They took out our boy. So RIP to the big man!

But I think next week we’ll figure out whatever was wrong there. We’ll fix that up. Hersant [Jacob] should have his setup sorted as well. He was supposed to be on tonight, but then some things came up.

So we’re gonna have Hersant and Tom on more again in the future, like it used to be. Well, Hersant’s been on a few times, but Tom used to be on more regularly. I do like doing the show when it’s like three or four of us a bit more because it’s kind of like often we cook up like a more intense conversation sometimes. What do you think?

Blair Cottrell: I think it was pretty intense. Oh, well, it wasn’t as intense as some of our conversations, but we’re building on it.

Joel Davis: Some of the best shows, when we go up on tangents for like an hour. That’s some of the best content in my opinion.

[1:48:58]

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Well, people watch the show in the background a lot of the time. The benefit of long streams is you can put them on while you’re doing other stuff. So people sometimes only catch glimpses of what you’re talking about, then they go back to it later if they’re really interested.

And that’s the point of these shows. It’s to kind of replace your standard television programme so you’re not being brainwashed by bad propaganda. You’re getting the good kind of propaganda from us. Because whatever you’re going to watch, it’s propaganda to some degree. Whatever you expose yourself to in the realm of entertainment information, it’s always propaganda to some degree. So choose the Right propaganda and you’ll know it’s the Right propaganda if you start if your life starts improving. I think like, one way to gauge the quality of the content you’re exposing yourself to is how your health shifts or develops or declines over time. Like, if you start watching a new type of political, ideological content, you get into that kind of thing, you’re into it for a few years. Compare the way you look and feel. Compare your physical health and your mental health to where you were three years prior, before you were into that stuff. If it’s worse, it’s probably shit for you. If it’s better, it’s good for you! And I seem to be getting healthier. So nationalism is good for you guys. Take my word for it.

I don’t know if I’m making no sense there. I’m getting to the point where I’m getting really drowsy.

But it’s been a good show, guys. Thanks for joining us.

Joel Davis: Before you go, that Ben Dawkins, who just quit the One Nation Party in WA, he just tweeted:

“I’ve been following some of the fallout from Parminder social media, but my press release says what I’m saying on my resignation from Pauline Hanson’s One Nation. I’ll post it tomorrow.”

So the fact that he mentioned it means it’s probably something to do with that. We’ll see tomorrow what comes out.

But yeah, keep up the pressure. Parmindergate has only just begun! Keep the pressure up on One Nation. If you’re not on Twitter, make a Twitter account. I’ve said this the whole time on this show. There’s a way to do online activism. You can make an impact online because everyone who’s speced into politics, works in politics, is in political media. They’re all on Twitter. If you can push narratives and direct conversations on Twitter, you can actually create an effect in actual politics if you do it effectively and aggressively with a big enough group. So get on there, help support the initiatives. And yeah, should be a Merry Christmas to everyone.

By the way, I know we’re still a few days out, but we probably won’t do another show until after Christmas. Maybe we will, maybe we won’t. Probably not. It’s a lot on, a lot of stuff with the community, with family and stuff I got to do personally. And that’s what you should be doing this time of year. Hopefully people have got time off work and you can spend it with your close friends, with your family in particular. And tis the season. Enjoy yourselves and we love you all. We’ll see you all in the next episode. And White fucking Power!

Blair Cottrell: See you guys.

[1:52:15]

END

top

============================================

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 1/1/2026 = 63)

akdjfhgpjksdnkjnsdfg
1 day ago
You must worship the JEW, or you are a national security threat.
2
0

Jak_85
Supporter
25 weeks ago
The aesthetic argument against terrorism is very true! It doesn’t all have to surround logic or false logic, but cool or not cool, gay or not gay.

XYZezima
1 year ago
Know what sucks? I can’t shit right now. I’m sitting here with a log that is apparently just too wide to pass. It’s honestly stressing me out. Why the fuck do we have all these weird health problems? My body can’t even regulate the size of its own turds and now I’m going to have to go to the hospital or die of a blockage. It’s not even funny, this honestly sucks. I am barely 30, I don’t smoke, drink maybe two times a year, diet could be better but I always feel like shit. Fuck I hate this world. Went and bought a little bottle of milk, it had 21g of sugar. 21g of fucking sugar for some 2% darigold milk. The chocolate milk had as much sugar as a Pepsi, almost 50g. Insane. Absolutely insane to pump us full of so much sugar. And now I can’t even shit. You guys understand I’m sitting here and I’m going to die from a prolapsed asshole (look it up, not a joke) and my cats are going to eat my fucking body. These jews got my body to sabotage itself, choking on its own shit. .. I hate this world.

BuckinghamPhallus
1 year ago
ON being run by a retarded fat bastard versus the polished opposition Indian bastards is part of the ruse. if you’re talking about “your” Indian you’re not talking about why he is even fucking there. brilliant movement of Overton window

masklophobix
1 year ago
Can Joel please just spend 80 bucks on a webcam already?? Potato-vision needs to go.

Napoleontas
1 year ago
I understand you are Australians, but if you want to attract the attention of a wider audience, you need to focus on broader issues. Just a friendly advice.

‹ Hide 1 reply
Jak_85
Supporter
25 weeks ago
Gay

Napoleontas
1 year ago
I like how the neurotic harpy excludes specifically White MEN from her “discrimination” and “racist” list. “Laws” legitimize the state employees to use violence against you, physical violence. That’s what “Laws” are.

Motion937
1 year ago
Balaclavas would be totally acceptable to them if it were only left-wing activists wearing them.
1
0

kitsubot
VerifiedSupporter
1 year ago
Banning face masks at protests? Lets see them ban makeup – u can use face paint to obfuscate ur identity too
3
0

‹ Hide 1 reply
Motion937
1 year ago
Ban left wing activists & politicians.

palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
EMJ addressing similair themes; https://rumble.com/v62kcve-chicago-talk-show-host-emj-interview-5-translate-hate-the-catholic-edition.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
Merry Christmas Joel. Don’t let the bastards get you down.

palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
Merry Christmas https://rumble.com/v5zbhph-the-xmas-song-2024.html?e9s=src_v1_upp

‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
Xmas larf

palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
‘JEWS HATE FREEDOM’. That is a great op when you objectively look at the power these cunts are abusing in parliament in Victoria. Well done Joel & lads.

‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
Melb- Canberra-DC-City of London

fdgrdfg
1 year ago
55:25 So India’s population in 1858 year was 203.000.000 of Indians and 20.000 British soldiers conquered them? That’s like 1:10000 ratio wtf.

BradC1988
1 year ago
White Fucking Power! o/
2
0

Rumbolinawave321
1 year ago
It’s a simple question How many immigrants are India taking? And if they aren’t taking any, why is it so?
3
0

newgerman
1 year ago
Talking about terrorism as she did without a peep about Israeli massacres.. then mentioning “anti-Semitism”… GOD IT IS FUCKING ENRAGING!!!!!
3
0

shovelheadamy
1 year ago
…nice shiner, btw

shovelheadamy
1 year ago
I heard this saying once, “In youth, wisdom and beauty is rare”. I think that this applies to you Joel. I am always impressed by your deep insight into such a wide array of subjects, fringed with a decent sense of humour, for someone so young. Always stay humble and hold fast. Thanks, from a Canadian. Blair and Tom are equally interesting to listen to. You men all seem to embody the spirit of our common gentlemanly ancestry with your decorum and manners.
2
0

Bumble_Bee
1 year ago
Anders Breivik, JDL confederate shoots up a bunch of boycott Israel Labor supporters on an island after the U.N voted to give Palestine a spot in the E.U parliament…. Brenton Tarrant the very year of the Pandemic did a hollywood style performance art that mirrors Wendy Scur’s account at Port Aurthur in which not only was there a ammo mag left in the hallway as Brenton Enters, the bodies laying by the chairs move by the time Brenton re-enters the mosque… All the bodies were not ripped apart by high velocity rounds nor at point blank range…also, Firearms experts show that nato rounds will go right through walls and produce smoke in enclosed spaces like that, Brenton was using an airgun and those “Muslims” were actors and the whole operation was a Mossad public relations excercise…. all in time for the pandemic…. which I’m sure they knew was coming… because Trump went to China and what a perfect place in China’s corrupt and disorganized system to launch a controlled release of a virus…(even it was even a virus since they’ve never isolated it nor shown what “covid 19″ actually is”

› Show 1 reply
FJB6666
1 year ago
Again. FFS. Joel your a LEGEND. I love your rants. They are the best..
3
0

FJB6666
1 year ago
Joel, your a LEGEND. I love your rants. There the best. 👍👍👍👍👍
7
0

Pincermovement
1 year ago
Go black face
3
0

FJB6666
1 year ago
Thomas should shorten his moustache, he’s needs the Adolf look.
6
0

LordVividColours
1 year ago
Blair was for sure on to something when he was talking about choosing the right propaganda to consume I became a nationalist about 2 years ago and in that time I quit smoking weed & tobacco, I stopped being a total degenerate, I got more & more active, I learned to see the bad propaganda clearly, I lost a shit tonne of weight and slowly my life has more meaning giving me more drive to actually have a life instead of an existence. I’d rather kill myself than go back to the way I was
23
0

‹ Hide 2 replies
UncircumcisedCircus
1 year ago
The system relies on people being doped up/down for people to not notice. The more sober I have been the easier it was to see through the lies.
4
0

newgerman
1 year ago
good for you man
2
0

MadHatterAU
1 year ago
Les Dawson could model that face on churches as a gargoyle.

› Show 1 reply
jjbeez57
1 year ago
Elephant in the living room…. Tom’s moustache looks gay. Sorry to say this as the guy’s a legend, but the people around him need to let him know. Like the intervention of an alcoholic by friends and family, they do it because they love them.
0
2

palacepony
Supporter
1 year ago
The stream breaks up with Tom’s very contentious exam into the racial nature of souls. Coincidence? Australian disrupt law?

TheShowgun
VerifiedSupporter+
1 year ago
You have officially lost your freedom gentlemen. 😔
0
3

ProvingNihil
1 year ago
Those laws for wearing face masks are ridiculous, they’re desperate at this point to find out our identity.
1
0

RoseRock444
Supporter
1 year ago
There is no such thing as a soul, Blair
1
2

‹ Hide 1 reply
Jak_85
Supporter
25 weeks ago
Soul from from Old English sawol from Old Norse sala from Proto-Germanic *saiwalō. “It has been suspected to have meant originally “coming from or belonging to the sea,” the supposed stopping place of the soul before birth or after death [Barnhart]; if so, it would be from Proto-Germanic *saiwaz (see sea). Klein explains this as “from the lake,” as a dwelling-place of souls in ancient northern Europe.” [etymonline source] Our soul is our “gene-lake” or “gene-pool”

bush_bash_boy
1 year ago
for an extremely smart fella, joel does the cause and himself, a disservice by talking about sensitive subjects, such as terrorism, and using words like “it’s gay” and “edge lord”. completely fine to say between mates, but it’s hard to take you serions when you talk like a troll.
8
7

‹ Hide 5 replies
EnglandAwake
1 year ago
Shut the fuck up with your unearned critiques.
6
0

‹ Hide 3 replies
HKeithVarange88
1 year ago
It was authoritative and humorous, don’t be a boomer
5
2

‹ Hide 1 reply
NaziGoering
1 year ago
He’s right. Joel talks like a troll because he thinks it sounds “edgey” but it’s just cringey.
5
2

‹ Hide 2 replies
whitehonkymonkey
1 year ago
agree, this podcast below , clearly states how hitler respected other cultures,yet preferred to separate. spoke about what was beneficial to germany and the messaging, he agreed with goebbels, talking down the others was of no benefit to the movement. why joel and some others fall for this denigration does not benefit the national socialist movement, if such people continue on this path,the jews win. comment below not aimed at you nazigoering. do as the fuhrer would do, FFS. yes your feeling a bit hurt by these comments, but please get on board we need to win over the masses. keep the denigration at home if you cant control it. be like the fuhrer. thank you. HH.https://rumble.com/v5jtq51-all-the-lies-you-have-been-told-about-hitler-part-1-x-space.html?playlist_id=watch-history
0
1
newgerman
1 year ago
This was an excellent WN discussion by the Three Aussi-teers. Where’s “Numero quatro”? Hope he’s not in jail or some shit. Above all, heartfelt congratulations on the upcoming baby, Mr. Sewell
1
0

LaborCorruptionCommission
1 year ago
Those guys are doing so much damage. Islam is the immediate problem. STFU and let their terrorism be front and centre. This shit just lets people be diverted to the Far Righht boogey man. IQ is not one of their qualities.
1
1

thorne91
Supporter+
1 year ago
Last comment I promise. But it seems like that fat jew cow on TV was talking directly to you guys. o/o/o/
1
1

thorne91
Supporter+
1 year ago
Jews always pass anti-“hate speech” laws right before they do a white genocide. It’s textbook for them, just like 9/11 and October 7th. It’s impressive how they have this shit down to a tee
9
1

‹ Hide 1 reply
thorne91
Supporter+
1 year ago
Main reference for this would be the Bolshevik Revolution, which I believe was simple a prototype of the worldwide cabal they intend to form. And they’ll mobilize their mud golems to carry it out against their white “oppressors” but I’m not worried because a few whites always crawl out of the ashes and rebuild. It’s just a condition of our existence to repeatedly overcome Jews and their golems.
4
1

thorne91
Supporter+
1 year ago
“His terrorism was boring and gay” hahahahaha
2
1

thorne91
Supporter+
1 year ago
I’m kind of surprised we still have a first and second amendment in USA at this point. It’s like the only based thing about living in this gay empire
2
1

Boonske
1 year ago
LIKE AND SHARE THE STREAM ITS THE LEAST YOU CAN DO
7
3

==========================

See Also

top

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript