Joel Davis: Welcome to the show. Apologies, we’re slightly late, there was technical difficulties, but we’re here. It is the 4th of November 2025.

 

Another show for you guys this evening and a lot to discuss, a lot to break down, before we get into the agenda. How are you doing? I actually haven’t spoken to you properly since we last did the show because I live in Sydney now, we don’t get to hang out so much, which is sad.

 

So how have you been?

 

Blair Cottrell: Good. Busy, working hard, trying to put together content for my business in my spare time. And I don’t mind the streams because now I get to play hardcore World of Warcraft every night we stream. It’s kind of the perfect slow paced background game. And my hardcore paladin is currently level 36. This is the first time I’ve played this character since we last trained. I’m pretty happy with it too. I’m pretty proud of myself. I got to level 36 without dying once, which is I think that’s a milestone. I don’t think I’ve done that before and I’ve been playing this game since I was like 14 or something, on and off. I haven’t been playing actually since I was 14.

 

But what’s been happening, …

 

Joel Davis: Level 36 without dying. Isn’t your birthday soon?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s on Remembrance Day. November 11th.

 

Joel Davis: That’s right, yeah. Remembrance Day, that’s like a week away. Everyone who went out of their way today to like put a bet on the Melbourne Cup or something, go out of your way on Remembrance Day to remember the fallen. More Australians gave their life in the First World War than basically every other war we’ve ever fought combined. So it needs to be reflected upon. We talk about it on Anzac Day often and so on, but it needs to be reflected upon.

 

The Anzacs were fighting for a White Australia. That’s what they thought they were fighting for, at the very least, they were fighting for the British Empire. And in the First World War, whatever you think of it, which I think there’s criticisms to be levied that the First World War was you know, Judeo-Masonic attack on the old monarchies of Europe and so on, from the Australian perspective, they were fighting for the British Empire in order to try and protect a land for the White man. For us here, that’s what they were fighting for. That’s why so many of them gave their lives.

 

Blair Cottrell: So I think too, if you were alive in those times and of fighting age, you were conscripted, was there conscription? Did Australians have to fight or was it all voluntary?

 

Joel Davis: No, it was voluntary.

 

Blair Cottrell: But if you were volunteering, you wouldn’t have been privy to all the information about criticisms of the mechanics behind the war. All you would have seen was war, like military recruitment propaganda about fighting for your country.

 

And that’s why you would have gone to war. If you put yourself back in those times, it’s very naive to believe that you would have behaved differently to how your great grandfathers behaved. You would have gone to war for the same purpose, to defend your country.

 

So I think it’s a mistake to denigrate soldiers of the past, because:

 

“Oh, it was just some contrived, you know, rich person business. It was some war put together by capitalists and they’re idiots for fighting!”

 

They still believed in what they were fighting for. Even if we have information now to prove those beliefs may have been misplaced, we still have to show respect for our ancestors. Right?

 

Joel Davis: Exactly! They were. And I mean, at the end of the day, we were a part of the British Empire and they were fighting to maintain British Imperial dominance, which is if the British Empire wasn’t brought down from within through traitors, jewish subversion and so on, then that would have been a completely valid thing. But by the same token, fighting the Japanese in World War II mean, obviously we don’t agree with fighting the Germans in World War II, but fighting the Japanese in World War II was obviously necessary to defend Australia from a hostile Asian empire with designs on our territories.

 

Blair Cottrell: Were the Japanese actually planning to invade Australian territory?

 

Joel Davis: They didn’t have really well developed plans to directly invade Australia. They did bomb Australia, though, and they did invade territories we controlled, such as Papua New Guinea. You know, New Guinea we actually got after World War I because New Guinea was actually under the control of the Germans up until World War I. And at the Treaty of Versailles, we basically walked away with control of New Guinea.

 

So when the Japanese got to New Guinea, they were effectively invading one of our territories. And we fought them there and resisted them there.

 

Also, we were part of the British Empire. The Japanese took Singapore off us. They invaded other kind of British Imperial holdings around Asia. So, yeah, it was a direct battle between our empire and theirs.

 

And ultimately, if we lost the Second World War to the Japanese, maybe they wouldn’t have invaded in the Second World War, but then they would have been this massive empire that we would have been at the mercy of and who knows what would have happened in the ensuing decades as a result.

 

[05:26]

 

Blair Cottrell: If the Germans and by extension the Japanese won the Second World War, what would that have meant for Australia, where would we be?

 

Joel Davis: I think we would have been forced to make an alliance with the Germans. The thing is, if they won the Second World War, that would mean some kind of victory over Britain for the Germans. If there was a victory over Britain for the Germans, then it would be like a Nazi Australia, I guess. It probably would have been pretty good. So that would have been pretty cool! But, you know, it went the way that it did.

 

Anyway. Rather than talking about World War II again, let’s talk about more current matters, more contemporaneous matters. I want to play this clip. It was publicized by The Noticer* in recent days, but I think it needs to be analyzed and discussed over and over again! And it got attention, but I thought it should have got more attention.

 

 

[* See: Police admit targeting nationalists and say it’s ‘concerning’ they’re forming political party-https:// www.noticer.news/police-target-nsn-white-Australia-political-party /]

 

A lot of cowards in Australian politics refusing to weigh in on this because they’re afraid of being seen to be sympathizing with Nazis, which is really pathetic! And it says a lot about the state of play and the rest of the Right-wing in this country. But I’ll play this clip. The person speaking is the acting Deputy Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police and it’s some Parliamentary committee [Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters] of some description. Here we go.

 

 

Female: And AFP [Australian Federal Police] can perhaps speak to this a little as well, Senator.

Nigel Ryan: (acting Deputy Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police) Yeah, thanks, Senator. I’m not aware of any specifics, but I think I can talk to some of the issues that we’re seeing and the things that we’re focusing on now, I don’t know whether you had the opportunity to hear our new commissioner, Chrissy Barrett, speak about the focus of the AFP at the moment and what we’re pivoting towards, particularly around issues affecting social cohesion and some of the groups that we’re seeing in society now that are affecting that social cohesion. Sovereign citizens are not necessarily a group, they’re usually individuals, but obviously of particular concern when you have a look at some of the instances of isolated violence more recently, particularly against police, that sovereign citizens have been partaking in.

I guess of more of a concern are some of those groups like the National Socialist Network, who we’re seeing trying to get into more of a political space. Our understanding is that the NSN is looking at whether they can form themselves as a political party, but we do see their activity more broadly. That doesn’t actually hit a threshold in terms of criminal offending, but the behaviour is concerning in terms of them pushing towards the line and a threshold that would be considered not violent behaviour, but disturbing behaviour in terms of what it means about how people feel about their safety and how they feel about the social cohesion aspect.

So to that extent, the AFP has formed new teams, the National Security Investigations teams, which are looking more towards those fringe elements that are working within society that are causing concern, but not actually meeting the threshold to have a look at where we can actively work in the preventative and disruptive space to dissuade some of those groups from some of their public behaviours.

Joel Davis: So, yeah, I mean, there’s a lot to break down there. Obviously you’ve seen the clip already, Blair.

 

I’ll say a few things. One, at the beginning he mentioned sovereign citizens. Obviously there was that recent occurrence in Victoria where Desi Freeman, the so-called sovereign citizen, I know they don’t like going by that term – that’s what the media and the police call them – where he killed two cops. Apparently the AFP is less concerned with people killing police officers than they are with us forming a political party because we might hurt people’s “feelings”. That’s quite incredible! He literally says in that spiel, that:

 

“He’s concerned about our behaviours which don’t meet the so-called criminal or violent threshold, but that we would disrupt so-called social cohesion.”

 

You know what disrupts social cohesion? Importing a bunch of niggers into my country! That’s what disrupts social cohesion! Deporting a bunch of sorry, importing a bunch of non-Whites of every different description into our country. That disrupts social cohesion. Because it means we don’t have a cohesive society because everyone is a different race. It’s pretty basic. They’re blaming us for pointing that out. It’s a total inversion of reality!

 

But yeah, now apparently it is now the police’s job to not worry about what crimes are. Not worry about people committing acts of violence, they’re less concerned about that. What they’re really concerned about is people trying to participate in liberal democracy who have opinions that differ from the status quo.

 

Blair Cottrell: Opinions that are “disturbing”. Not criminal, but disturbing. And they’re classified as such because they affect how people “feel” about social cohesion.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! So it’s just ridiculous! Obviously we have a constitution in this country that says we should have a representative democracy. Apparently the Australian people are sovereign. They get to elect their own leaders. Well, there’s an open admission there from the Australian Federal Police. They don’t actually believe in liberal democracy. They believe in this thing called “social cohesion”, which appears to be “White people being replaced and not getting upset about it”. That’s what they mean by social cohesion. Is that why people need to basically:

 

“Shut up and not complain about the fact that they are being genocided! The fact that we are being ethnocided!”

 

And if you complain about it, if you stand up against, if you try to form a political party and be political and follow the laws and don’t meet the threshold of criminality or violence, then the police are going to take it upon themselves, the Federal Police are going to take our tax dollars and then form special units that are going to disrupt that political party.

 

[12:25]

 

I mean, this is clearly unconstitutional, illegal. This is like a communist country. It’s like they’re basically admitting that they’re like the Stasi*, they’re like the NKVD*. They are political police, whose primary responsibility is to uphold the political establishment, not prosecute crimes.

 

[* Stasi: Official state security service of the German Democratic Republic (East Germany) The Ministry for State Security, commonly known as the Stasi, was the state security service and secret police of East Germany from 1950 to 1990. The function of the Stasi in East Germany resembled that of the KGB in the Soviet Union, ⁠ in that it served to maintain state authority and the position of the ruling party, in this case the Socialist Unity Party of Germany. Wikipedia]

 

[* The People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs, abbreviated as NKVD, was the interior ministry and secret police of the Soviet Union from 1934 to 1946. The agency was formed to succeed the Joint State Political Directorate secret police organisation, and thus had a monopoly on intelligence and state security functions. The NKVD is known for carrying out political repression and the Great Purge under Joseph Stalin, as well as counterintelligence and other operations on the Eastern Front of World War II. Prior organisation was the dreaded CHEKA.]

 

It’s quite an incredible admission. And what cowardice from the Australian Right-wing where basically none of them said anything about this. The only person who did that I saw were the New South Wales libertarians, like John Ruddick’s people in New South Wales as ideologically consistent libertarians. Ralph Babet said something and then deleted it, five to ten minutes later. He pussied out!

 

And no one else said anything. Probably because they’re partially happy that the Federal Police are going to fuck with us because they’re afraid that we’re going to take their voters away or something, that we’re going to come in and steal their spot! But it just kind of exposes the whole system for what it is! That these people who claim to be upholding democracy and all of this garbage, they don’t actually believe any of that it’s a total lie! It’s a total farce! And why are the Nazis at the forefront of free speech, democracy? Why are we the ones trying to uphold it? I mean, it’s a total inversion of the roles [chuckling] that are supposed to be denominated. But I think it’s an incredible story!

 

What’s your analysis, Blair? Like, what kind of tactics do you expect them to use because they said “disrupt”, they didn’t say they’re going to put it, … Obviously we don’t meet your threshold of criminality. They can’t stop us from forming a political party. They’ve got no legal recourse to do.

 

So I think some of the things that they’re doing probably is creating social media accounts and using them to spread misinformation about us, turn people against us, imitate us. We’ve seen a rise in fake NSN accounts online, causing dramas, a rise in accounts that seem like that all they do all day is just make posts about the NSN and how offended they are by us. And that’s the only thing that they post about. Who has time for that? You know, people usually have jobs and families and this kind of thing. So maybe it’s feds? Maybe it’s just all feds? A lot of these accounts.

 

What also they’re going to do probably frivolous lawsuits. We’ve had plenty of those. But yeah, other than making, basically doing psyops online and engaging with frivolous lawsuits, these are kind of the more obvious things. What else do you think they’re going to do, or are doing already?

 

Blair Cottrell: I suppose this explains why specialised teams of Federal Police officers have been raiding people across the country who are in any way, shape or form supportive of National Socialist Network or White Australia, raiding them on no evidence and trying to find some reason to set them up on charges. So this has probably been happening for a few months already. At least a few months.

 

And it’s really concerning because the term “disrupt”, when people in official politics use terms like “disrupt” and “dissuade”, that basically means anything. That means anything beneath the ostensible. And the ostensible must appear as legit. They have to act like they’re working within certain frameworks on the surface, but underneath the surface, that’s the realm of “disrupt and dissuade”. That’s like the tier of counterinsurgency. That’s literally anything, man! That’s anything they can get away with!

 

So that’s like a secret political police developing strategies to fuck with a specific group because they don’t want them forming a political party, and because they’re not actually doing anything criminal. I don’t think there’s any precedent for a Federal Police officer making that statement in Australian history. I can’t actually stress the significance of this is really fucked up! This basically means what I think this means, what it exposes to me is the Australian political system, the Liberal versus Labor voting system is extremely fragile. No one likes the Liberal Party and no one likes the Labor Party. They just kind of vote one way or the other based on traditional. And there’s no effective Third Position for people to vote their way out of that sequence, that never ending sequence of Liberal-Labour. There’s One Nation but they’re in bed with Israel. There’s the Greens, but they’re just communists.

 

So I think what they do, and I’ve said this before on previous streams, I think there’s like analysts within the government that run various scenarios through AI programs in order to estimate the effectiveness of a White Australia party. Meaning they run it through like a scenario system, a computerized AI system that’s going to give them answers based on the current political climate situation, based on the current environment:

 

“How many votes would a White Australia Party get if it was formed right now?”

 

And I think the answer is staggering! I think it’s really frightening them! I think they know that a White Australia Party could be like the next One Nation but bigger and cooler, younger, more exciting, more interesting. And because there is such a large silent White Australian voter base who can vote basically anonymously, I think it’s obvious that a lot of people would vote for White Australia Party right now! Not only is it new, fresh and exciting, it has its roots in tradition. And tradition is one of the pillars of power. You’ve got force, popularity and tradition.

 

And you’ve got to ask yourself what does the government have on its side right now in regards to those three pillars? Does the government have popularity? No! Does the government have tradition? It sort of pretends to observe tradition because it knows it has to in order to maintain power structure, but it’s actually trying to destroy Australian tradition and replace it with its own version of ceremonies and rituals, largely surrounding Aboriginal culture. Right?

 

[18:55]

 

The only thing the government has on its side is force. It’s operating on a single pillar. Whereas a White Australia party would have popularity and tradition on its side. So already the government is at a disadvantage. Even though it has all the resources, the only real resource it can call upon to defend its current position is force, is violence! And BC beneath the tier of violence, such as disruption and dissuasion, right? Which is all manner of cloak and dagger activities.

 

So I think they’re really worried! And I think they know they have to nip the White Australia Party in the bud! And I think there’s nothing they won’t fucking do to achieve that.

 

So it’s very concerning. It’s really concerning that the Australian Federal Police are now being used as a bulwark, as attack dogs against a specific group of young people coming together to try to form their own political party legally. As you said, how is that democracy? That’s not fucking democracy! And it just exposes yet again that we don’t live in a fucking democracy! So I don’t really know what to expect.

 

Basically, it’s:

 

“Brace yourself, lads!”

 

That’s my feeling. And my analysis, my intuition’s been telling me for the last six months that things are going to get really ugly. Because I could see the potential for a White Australia party. I could see it a year ago and the potential is growing! It’s especially going to grow in, how should I put it? In reference to what’s going to happen in England. Things are starting to heat up in England and around the West, the rest of the world. In Europe you’re going to see similar situation and people in Australia are going to look for a way to vote themselves out of a similar fate. And if White Australia is all there is, they will vote for it! It’ll get millions of votes! It’ll explode out of the blocks, I think.

 

And I think that’s what this is all about. Yeah. So very concerning times ahead, is where I’ll wrap up my analysis.

 

Joel Davis: Concerning, but it’s also exciting! It’s very exciting because I think, as you said, if they thought that it was going to be a dud, if they thought that we weren’t capable of achieving anything, then they just let us do it. They’d be like:

 

“Let them go down this path.”

 

This is going to be a more neutral path and a safer path from their point of view. You would think, they would almost, like if they didn’t think anyone would vote for us why not let us go up there and embarrass ourselves?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, that’s the thing, Joel. You don’t really need to be very intelligent to succeed in politics. You just need to be consistent and simplistic. I don’t mean like intellectually simplistic necessarily. I mean you just need that one simple, easy to understand message. You need to ground yourself in some manner of tradition relative to the culture that you’re trying to persuade, you’re trying to represent, and you just need to be consistent. You just need to keep pushing, keep fighting and protect your reputation as much as possible.

 

It’s not really rocket science, politics you’re basically trying to persuade simpletons to tick a box that says your name next to it. [chuckling] It’s not really a difficult process. And because the circumstances, the environment right now in Australia is perfect for a new, young, exciting party to basically steal the show, the current power structure is developing political police tactics in response to that.

 

And I think it’s going to be so something that we’ve never seen before. I think it’s going to be something that Australia, there’s no precedent for in Australia. So as I said, it’s like a brace yourself situation and prepare to support each other.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but what I’ve also noticed is that Australian police are very incompetent, …

 

Blair Cottrell: What makes you say that specifically? Give me an example of Australian policing incompetence.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I would say the way that they handled, for example, Australia Day last year we were in Adelaide. I think all they did was create a sympathetic scenario for us that gained a lot of positive attention and they tried to engage in a legal strategy that has been ridiculously unsuccessful, and just basically de-legitimize themselves and make themselves look stupid and mishandle the whole process. They have not been effective in stopping us. The only move they were able to make against us was more recently against Sewell, putting him in jail. But you know, that was an unforced error by Sewell. Like running up the police didn’t make him do that, run up a hill in 4K and beat someone up.

 

So in terms of like their strategic designs, the sum total of the efforts over the last two years are basically added up to fuck all, in terms of actually, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what it’s worth. It’s worse than fuck all! If you are in the position where you consider NSN an enemy or even a nuisance for yourself as a police officer or something. If you’re in a government position where you command police officers, you’ve made the situation worse for yourself! It would have been better for the police to do nothing than to publicly and aggressively arrest people for trying to host an Australia Day march. Like obviously that’s going to win sympathy from the public. For the public who loves an underdog, Australians love to see someone struggling against authority. They love an underdog!

 

[24:39]

 

So you’re kind of creating this hero class of people by policing in a manner as aggressive as that. So for them the situation is worse than zero. They’ve actually contributed to elevating you guys in. I think what’s really worried them is when you guys arrived at August 31, March for Australia rally, it was clear that you had support from the majority of the people there. Very clear! And people were doing interviews saying:

 

“They don’t even care if there’s Nazis here, as long as everyone’s united against immigration.”

 

And that means people won’t even care about voting for a Nazi party so long as it’s against immigration. You see, that’s what that translates into for any government analyst.

 

So I think that’s what’s triggered, … It’s one of the things that’s triggered this effort to create a new tier of political policing, which was already in the works before that anyway. But that really pushed it over the line because it would have proven their analysts correct if they had already ran the White Australia scenario through their AI sequencing. Then when they saw in real time people shaking hands with you guys, cheering you guys on, and just admitting in interviews that they’re willing to support you, like regular people, that kind of proved all the data they already would have been collecting. It proved it correct.

 

So that’s what’s motivating them, I think.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, the reason why people are supporting us is because they’re genociding the White race and people are waking up to it. I mean, it’s that simple. We’re actually behind the curve in this country from where it is in other Western countries.

 

I mean, I saw Lindsay Graham from the Republican Party giving an interview the other day, and he said:

 

“Oh, I’m from the ‘Hitler sucks’ faction of the Republican Party!”

 

He’s like:

 

“What how crazy is this thinking Hitler is awesome thing now?”

 

What is he implying? That there’s a Hitler is “awesome faction” of the Republican Party now? That’s crazy! Yeah, but there kind of is. And like the Overton Window has shifted so far the Zeitgeist, like the attitude of the people. And that’s largely down to social media, because what has happened with social media is the traditional media has lost its influence over the collective consciousness. There’s been a decentralisation of political media in particular.

 

And that means that jews don’t control political discourse anymore. And so jews and academics and all of these different, like, committed political groups that have advanced this agenda against our people. Now a more grassroots, a more independent form of political discourse exists. And so it will tend towards the authentic politics that we represent.

 

So what is coming? Like, where people are at now is already a lot better than where they were before. But what’s coming is way more than this! The next five to 10 years, there’s going to be an explosion in our worldview, particularly with young White people. An explosion! It’s inevitable and it can’t be stopped! Doesn’t matter how many laws they try to pass on censoring the Internet, how many divisions they create within the AFP to arrest anti-semites. It doesn’t matter, because they did all this stuff in Britain and it’s still happening in Britain!

 

I saw a opinion poll in Britain. If an election was held today in Britain, the conservatives and Labor between them would have like 29 seats out of a possible 650. That would be like if we were going to hold an election in Australia tomorrow and only three people were going to get elected from like Liberal and Labor. That’s literally where it’s at in Britain. The political centre has been eviscerated. And obviously the parties on the outside of that are still, they’re not perfect. They’re not what the kind of party we want to build.

 

But the point is that the old political formula has been smashed! It’s been fucking smashed in Britain! And it’s been smashed all over Europe and a new paradigm is rising and it will rise here, inevitably. Zoomers in America are more Right-wing than Boomers now. That’s insane! Like, no one was predicting this. Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson talking about the jews is like mainstream political discourse.

 

And then you’ve got like Ben Shapiro complaining about it on the corner of the Internet and no one’s watching anymore. That’s how it is now. No one’s watching the old jew media anymore. Everything’s different. Everyone’s Instagram algorithm is pumping out Hitler speeches at them. It’s become normal to talk about the jews now? It’s become normal to talk about these kinds of issues. And that’s just the start.

 

So when we come along and we bring a political party with the kind of policies that we’re going to put forward and the approach we’re going to be put forward, fuck yes, there’s a constituency for it! And they can throw the kitchen sink at us because we’ve already proven we will go to jail for this! If, I mean, we don’t want to go to jail, but if we have to, we have determination. We will sacrifice. We will continue pushing forward.

 

The Liberal Party isn’t going to go to jail to stay in the Liberal Party. The only people in the Liberal Party going to jail are the paedophiles that get caught. Like what happened to that guy the other day. Imagine if we had someone in our organisation, by the way, who got caught literally touching up a kid. They would call us paedophiles, right? Liberal Party literally just had that happen. Crickets! No one blames the Liberal Party.

 

But anyway, my point is this. The political establishment in this country is flimsy. It is weak. I’m not saying that we’re going to win an election anytime soon, but we are going to be a really disruptive force on this. And they can try and fuck with us, and they can try and put some of our guys in jail and they can make a nuisance of themselves. And I’m sure it will suck. I’m sure it will suck for me personally. It might suck for you personally, Blair, and a bunch of us, but we ain’t gonna fucking stop! And they’re not gonna kill us. I said this I think last. Do you agree with this take? They’re not like the communists of old. The communists of old would fucking shoot us. They’d just fucking kill us! These are fucking soft, they’re not gonna do that.

 

[31:13]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but there’s different standards now. It’s that there’s modern ways of being burned at the stake where it’s not really effective to kill. When you kill your enemies, especially in politics, you actually embolden your enemy further and you win more sympathizers for your enemy by how cruel your conduct is. And sort of factions within politics have worked that out these days. And plus, we live in this post violence era. Violence will always be a thing. It’s an eternal aspect of the world, our reality. But the era that we’re in right now is a post violence era, where everything except violence is basically permissible. Like, even down to the dirtiest, darkest tactics, so long as you’re not being outrightly violent, it’s all well and good!

 

And so, yeah, even though they won’t kill you, as I said, there’s modern ways for them to publicly burn you alive and sort of torture you, humiliate you in a political way. And that’s what you’ve got to be worried about, basically.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but it’s not as bad. They’re not going to kill us. So it’s like we grit and bear it. You know what I mean? It’s not the like, it’s bearable. Like this is not an enemy that you should be that afraid of:

 

“Oh, maybe if you work in one field where you will lose your job or something.”

 

Blair Cottrell: You say they won’t kill you too. How can you be so sure? I saw some information that Charlie Kirk may have been killed by some sort of mechanism that shot up out of the microphone he was wearing. That might sound a bit conspiratorial, but when I saw the footage, even I had to admit, sounds pretty weird! Do you think it’s possible that Charlie Kirk was assassinated by like an organised political effort by an overseas country?

 

Joel Davis: It’s not that it’s impossible! Like it’s possible, but I don’t think any of these theories about it was a mechanism on his body, blah, blah, blah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Have you seen the footage?

 

Joel Davis: If someone else was involved, they would have just like groomed a tranny to do it.

 

And then you’ve got the, like, they would like the way that it was described. Like it’s within the power of the intelligence agencies in America or in Israel or whatever to groom trannies into committing political assassinations or tranny fuckers nto political assassinations.

 

So I don’t think you need to have this elaborate:

 

“Oh, there was a device!”

 

You know, know all this kind of stuff. I don’t know why. We’ve talked about this before on the show. I don’t know what we’re going back to this.

 

Blair Cottrell: But I was just thinking about, because you said that’s the thing, …

 

Joel Davis: If they’re going around killing everyone who disagrees, why are they’re killing Charlie Kirk? Charlie Kirk was a fucking moderate! They’re not killing Nick Fuentes! They’re not killing like more radical voices. They’re killing the more moderate ones. That doesn’t even make any sense. Since Charlie Kirk has died, things have only become more anti-Israel, more racist, more radical! So you know, what the whole like, theory around it, …

 

Blair Cottrell: For the record, I don’t actually believe anything I’m putting forward here. I’m just saying that I saw that stuff on the Internet and a lot of people seem to believe it, but I was only throwing you something contrarian because you were suggesting they won’t kill you. Like these people won’t kill you.

 

But I think there’s some evidence they, …

 

Joel Davis: If they kill me one day, they’re going to turn me into a martyr and make me more popular!

 

Blair Cottrell: Israeli intelligence, yeah, definitely would kill you! But I think you have to be a pretty significant threat or you have to be projected to become a pretty significant threat for them to start considering that. Because, as I said, they run the risk of making you into a martyr and actually just building their opponent up even more.

 

But now we’re going full circle back to what I was talking about before.

 

Joel Davis: You’re doing like little haphazard killings is always counterproductive. You have to kill everyone. You just knock off a few people all you do is turn them into heroes and embolden the rest of them to get revenge and to kind of move forward. So, they’re not gonna kill every nationalist in Australia. There’s no one is shaping up seriously to do that it’s not going to happen. And they are creating obstacles.

 

Like, for example, there’s a lot of people that have not signed up on our website to be a political supporter. A lot of them is sheer laziness. And I know there’s a lot of the you lazy fucks that are listening to this right now, …

 

Blair Cottrell: When you say, …

 

Joel Davis: Wait a second, I want to say something. If you’re one of these lazy fucks that hasn’t signed up to our political party out of laziness, do it tonight! Do it now! Literally do it right now! You can do it while you’re listening to this or watching this, go to White Australia.org, sign up as a political supporter! If it’s just laziness holding you back, particularly if you live in New South Wales, because, that’s actually the key state where we need quick signups at the moment because, …

 

[36:11]

 

Blair Cottrell: What are you asking people to do? Because I don’t understand. What are you asking people to do when you say sign up as a political supporter, what does that mean? What are you asking?

 

Joel Davis: It means basically you, … We have an encrypted database, right, that you basically import your details into on our website. It is highly encrypted. We do not want anyone getting doxed and they won’t! It’s a highly encrypted database that you know is not going to be breached.

 

Blair Cottrell: But what information do you need? What information?

 

Joel Davis: Your basic details. Your name, address. But it has to be what your electoral role address where you’re enrolled to vote. And we can send that off to the Australian Electoral Commission to then say, we’ve got enough members of our party to register the party.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t mean to be, … Maybe it’s not the right question, but I’ll ask it anyway. Do you trust the Australian Electoral Commission?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I mean, yeah, they’ve never leaked anything like this before. So there’s privacy laws. It’s like the cops know, like ASIO know who all of you are! They can figure out every single person who watches one of these streams on their phone or something. They can figure out who you are. Right.

 

So you’re already on a list that the government can access, but they don’t just publish it. That’s not how it works. And it’s not going to be how it works. So people need to fucking chill. It’s never been like that and never will be like that.

 

Secondly, how the fuck are we going to do anything unless we build a political vehicle in order to advance our ideology, our worldview, our position with the Australian public? So if that means you have to take a little bit of risk, obviously it’s not really much of a risk. We are protecting your ass! We’re not asking you to put on the black block and go march in the street, yell “hail victory”. Just asking you to sign up to a political party. And there’s legal protections. You’ll be fine. And we’ve encrypted our databases.

 

But yes, that’s the small sacrifice you have to make of spending two minutes inputting your correct details into our website so that we can go and register a political party and perhaps get thrown in jail! We’ll deal with all the difficult shit for you! All you have to do is just sign the paper, put the fries in the bag. That’s all you got to do. So just do it! Particularly if you’re in New South Wales.

 

And then also don’t just do it yourself. Go to your friends, go to your family and get them to do it. Get them to do it as well. Get as many people as you possibly can to do it! We need as many members as possible. The more members we have, the more momentum. Like even once we reach the minimum thresholds, the more members, the better. And they’re going to audit the members. Some people are going to move house or have put in the wrong details or whatever.

 

And so we’re going to need to have a glut of members, like I’ve explained before. It’s such a minimal thing. That’s such a minimal ask. It’s a really minimal ask!

 

Blair Cottrell: I noticed someone in your organisation, one of the leaders I saw through Noticer News tried to register “White Australia” as a business entity through like some sort of government business or like regulatory board.

 

And the response from this board was that the term “White Australia” because it meant White ethnically, the registration request was rejected on that basis because it was like offensive or something.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that was to register a corporation. That wasn’t to register a party.

 

Blair Cottrell: I know that. My question is, has there been any progress with that? Because I know that that same board accepted a registration request from Black Lives Matter and registered them as a corporation, but they said no to White Australia because of the term White. But they didn’t have a problem with the term “black”. I wonder if there’s been any update with any response.

 

Joel Davis: We just registered under a different name. We couldn’t be, there’s an appeals process, but we just couldn’t be fucked with it because it doesn’t really matter that much.

 

Blair Cottrell: It would have been a good test because you’re probably gonna get the same response from the AEC.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, you know what would be an even better test? Building the fucking party!

 

So that’s why we’re focusing on that rather than dicking around, on arguing over registering corporations and stuff, because it’s a side issue, you know what I mean? But because a lot of people said:

 

“Oh, you can’t have your party because of that!”

 

It was like, it was almost like we shouldn’t have like put that out there because people don’t read past the headline and it confuses people. But they won’t be able to block the political party on those grounds because the Electoral Act doesn’t give them the same kind of leeway and the Constitution doesn’t give them the same kind of leeway on political parties, that they have with corporations.

 

And I think we would have won the appeal on the corporation, but it would have cost thousands of bucks and it would have taken a while and, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It would have said a precedent though too. So then you could have used the same argument with the aec. That’s what I was thinking.

 

[41:04]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we can look into, we can look into still doing it down the track, but it becomes a bit of a drawn out process anyway.

 

But when it comes to the party, like people just need to sign up! In New South Wales election is in March 2027. There’s a Victorian state election I think next November and then the following March in 2027 is the new South Wales election. So it’s some time away. It’s like a year until the Victorian election and then a year and four months till the New South Wales election and then the following year we’ll have the next federal election. Those are the three elections we’ve got our eye on. WA doesn’t have an election for years. Queensland doesn’t have an Upper House and so it’s less worth focusing on.

 

And the other states are kind of irrelevant, to be honest, not fully irrelevant, but they’re kind of irrelevant in terms of the national conversation. So Victoria, New South Wales are the two main, two biggest states, the two states where we have the most members and the two that we wanted to target first as a political party.

 

But in Victoria you only need 500 Victorian members in order to contest their state elections. And so that’s going to be a lot easier for us in Victoria. In New South Wales it’s 750. And in New South Wales, if you’re not, if you’re not registered a year prior to the election, you can’t get listed on the ballot paper.

 

Additionally, New South Wales, we probably have a better chance at actually getting someone elected than in Victoria, not because we’d get a higher percentage of the vote necessarily in one state or the other, but because of the system. So in New South Wales, like John Ruddick got elected off like 3% of the vote because New South Wales, they don’t have group voting. It’s more like kind of the Senate election in the federal election is kind of the same in the New South Wales state election.

 

Whereas in the Victorian state election they break the Upper House down into eight zones, three regional zones and five metro zones. And the top five from each of those zones get elected.

 

But the thing is that in Victoria, in the state election when you., … That seems like a good system, you just have to come fifth in your zone and you can get in. That doesn’t sound so hard. But and we probably could still do this. But the more difficult aspect of it is that in Victoria people usually don’t vote below the line and preference all of the different parties, they just put a vote above the line and then they get automatic preferencing. So we would have to do preference deals with all these other parties and get them to preference us high in order to get all their preferences. And it’d be really difficult because we’re Nazis and they’re probably not going to work with us. Who knows? We can cut some deals but it might be hard.

 

In New South Wales cutting the deals isn’t the same level of difficulty because there is an automatic preferencing in how people vote. So in New South Wales in theory we will get more preferences, you would think. So that’s why we really want to be registered to contest this election in New South Wales.

 

So if you live in New South Wales, sign the fuck up! ! We are desperate, and do it immediately because I would really much like it if we can get above the line that election, it would be great! But I’m going to stop talking about that. I know people are probably annoyed at me yammering on about that.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, we’re never annoyed about your yammering, Joel! Yammer away!

 

Joel Davis: I guess that’s what the show is. That’s literally why we’re here.

 

Blair Cottrell: But well you mentioned Remembrance Day, …

 

Joel Davis: Because people, Australians, one thing about us, and I’m like this too, we’re fucking lazy! We can’t be fucked as a people.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know if, would you say we’re lazy?

 

Joel Davis: We work hard, but when it comes to like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I think we’re more, we’re a bit black pilled on politics. I think that’s what it is. I just don’t think we like politics. Australians have a general disinterest. They don’t think there’s any hope. They think it’s all bullshit!

 

Joel Davis: That’s true. But also people are fucking lazy. People are fucking lazy in terms of doing it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Mental laziness that leads people to think this stuff too. Because politics is made to seem a lot more complicated than it really is. At the end of the day it’s just when you’ve got a homogenous society it’s different ideas competing, usually economic ideas and then there’s a few subversives in there trying to fuck your country up. If you have a good intelligence system it prevents that from happening.

 

We don’t have a homogenous society anymore. We have a multi-ethnic society. And so all politics is now is different ethnic groups trying to get an advantage over each other. It’s just different ethnic groups and some ethnic groups, namely the White ethnic group that’s currently in Parliament is working against its own ethnic interests. Generally speaking. And it’s happening in England, it’s happening in Europe. As soon as society becomes multi-ethnic political politics becomes racial. It’s just different racial groups battling each other to try to get an advantage or to try to put the other group at a disadvantage. And it’s really that simple. There’s Nothing else to consider in politics right now!

 

So you mentioned Remembrance Day, though, and I was curious, what would I call them? People from Sydney, New South Walers. What do people in New South Wales do for Remembrance Day? What do you do? Is there somewhere in the city that everyone goes?

 

[46:31]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we don’t really have, like a massive shrine, like in Melbourne, which I mean, I was in Melbourne for the last two Remembrance Days and so I was able to go to the Shrine of Remembrance, which is better.

 

Blair Cottrell: But what about Hyde Park, there’ a big stone structure?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. In Hyde Park, there is a big War Memorial.

 

So there’s something, but it’s just not as impressive as the temple, basically, that exists in Melbourne to the Anzacs, which is probably the most magnificent building in Australia. But we can talk about Remembrance Day next week because that’ll be the week of the show. I really want to talk about.

 

Blair Cottrell: I just want to say something about it.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, okay. Okay, go ahead.

 

Blair Cottrell: The date November 11th is significant for a couple of reasons. Ned Kelly was hanged on November 11th. And I’m pretty sure the Berlin Wall came down on November 11th as well, I mean, that’s not necessarily pivotal for Australia, but it’s definitely a pivotal moment in European history. I’ll just say a lot of significant stuff happens in November, and November 11th, like there’s this whole list of weird shit that happens on November 11th. I don’t know if anyone knows any more about that than I do, but if you’re into that kind of stuff, hit me up because I’m interested to learn more about the strange occurrences that always seem to take place throughout November.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I don’t know what are you alleging, what’s going to happen?

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know, it’s something to do with the stars, man! I’m telling you. Usually radical change, violent change, or just something really significant tends to be happening throughout November, historically speaking. And I don’t know why that is. Someone might have a better idea as to why that is. I’m not really talking from a numerological perspective. I’m not into numerology at all! But, yeah, I’m just throwing it out there. It’s always made me feel a bit weird about my birthday, too. It’s just like:

 

“Oh, God, what’s going to happen to me?”

 

Cukg Time will tell!

 

Joel Davis: But, yeah, on the party, I’ve been working a bit on the policies that we’re going to have and we haven’t put them out yet because it’s one thing that Tom can actually have some input in from jail. So send him some a draught and we’ll see what he thinks. He might have a few different ideas so we can at least work together on something even though he’s in prison.

 

But a few of the ideas that I’ve had, I mean, we’ve spoken about some of them on the show. Some of the policies that we agreed upon, like debt forgiveness and mother’s allowance and executing paedophiles and things like that. But a few others.

 

I was going to get your takes on some of my ideas Blair, of policies here or some of our ideas.

 

Blair Cottrell: You care what I think?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course.

 

Blair Cottrell: Let’s do it!

 

Joel Davis: Of course. So one idea for a policy that is oh so necessary is pretty basic, but just got to have restoring free speech in the platform. Now some people will call me a cuck. They’ll say:

 

“Why are you trying to restore free speech? Why are we trying to give free speech to communists and brown people?”

 

Now, yes, from an ideological standpoint, I don’t agree with giving free speech to everyone because I don’t believe in giving free speech to my political enemies. But considering the fact that it’s our speech that is being rejected, not theirs, I think tactically it makes sense to advocate for restoring free speech because it’s really only our speech that’s under threat.

 

So there’s that. Another policy area that we think is very important because we don’t have too many. We have like 10 policies and just call it there and keep it simple. Because as you said, Australians aren’t going to bother to read 50 policies and have opinions on them. But another policy is, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I do think free speech is dangerous because that makes you receptive to enemy ideology.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but the enemy ideology already has freedom. Our ideology is the one that’s restricted.

 

Blair Cottrell: So basically you want to reverse the current circumstances.

 

Joel Davis: At least level the playing field. I think that’s the right tactical decision. But yeah, well, maybe you don’t. Should we run on taking away communist speech or something? I don’t know.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, no, I just think just certain there just should be agencies dedicated to counter subversion.

 

So like if you’re identified as a subversive unit group ideology, then you don’t have many rights basically. And that can be abused, that kind of policy. So there would need to be some sort of oversight in place to prevent it from being misused. That’s the thing that we had ASIO, which is Australia’s version of like a security agency. Would it be the Australian version of FBI Joel? Is that accurate to say?

 

Joel Davis: It’s like NSA, FBI? Yeah, it’s like a few agencies in America mixed together.

 

[52:08]

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, subversion or working against subversive tactics was part of ASIO’s definition of state security before the Hawk Labor government, I think up until around 1989, around the year of my birth, somewhere around there perhaps. But the Hawk Labor government actually put ASIO to the test because they accused them of using the term “subversion” to intrude upon the freedoms of certain groups and personalities.

 

And so the Hawk Labor government removed “subversion” from ASIO’s definition of state security and replaced it with “politically motivated violence”. So I’ve spoken about that a few times because I think that was a real pivotal moment in Australia’s history because we had a state that was making some effort to prevent hostile ideology from taking root in institutions like schools, police departments, government agencies.

 

But that was all just removed by the Hawk Labor government. And instead our national security or intelligence agencies were refocused on just violence. As though pushing people around in the street because of ideology is more of a threat to the nation than teaching kids transgenderism and communism. You know, obviously subversive ideology is more of a threat than direct violence a lot of the time.

 

So I think that was one of the greatest mistakes any government has made in Australian history.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but that leads to the next policy which is like restoring patriotic education. Like getting rid of all anti-White garbage out of every level of education, including the universities, and restoring pro-Australian, pro-White version of how history is taught and also compulsory martial arts for all boys. Because I think we need to become a nation of fighters. That’s our education policy. I think if you fix it, the level of education, just regulate education correctly.

 

Blair Cottrell: You can’t run a nation on love. You can only run nations on hate. Like the current civilisation is run on hatred of White people.

 

So if you reverse that situation where suddenly White people are no longer the hated enemy which unifies all of multicultural society, who’s the new enemy? Who are we united against?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we’re not going to like create an education policy of like, we’re going to build an education policy of fuck jews, and make like anti-semitism, [chuckling] like official government like that, I mean, it’s probably not a smart angle. Like the Left didn’t do that. The Left appealed first to free speech and to equality and so on, first.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but that’s boring now. The reason conservative elements of society are failing right now is because appealing to all of this moral goodness is fucking boring! ! And we’ve got a desensitized youth who are looking for more edgy messaging. And Hitler sold anti-semitism to people openly and they took it.

 

Joel Davis: You can sell it to people openly like a political strategy.

 

But in terms of like, I mean, the point is that like the education system is basically penetrated or just like overwhelmed with anti-White ideology, like a genocidal ideology against our people. Basically. It just needs to be like reversed.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but the point still stands like within that edgy. You’re saying the Leftists are being crafty. They’re not really like, you go into a university and they’re like:

 

“White people are responsible for all the fucked up stuff in the world.”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know what I mean? Like you want to change it to:

 

“Jewish people are responsible for all the suffering of the nations.”

 

Like you want to flip that.

 

So the whole mantra of the education department would replace the enemy of society. It’s currently White people. It would need to be someone else, is the point that I’m making, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean patriots have many enemies. So like the historical enemies of patriots have been jewish subversion.

 

I mean, you talk about ASIO, the reason why ASIO [Australian Security Intelligence Organisation] came into existence in the first place was because jews immigrated here from Eastern Europe after World War II and they were communists, because all jews in Eastern Europe were communists at that time, basically.

 

That’s why they all had to be put in camps during the Second World War, which was against communists, by the Germans.

 

But anyway, they started stealing. They started infiltrating our government and stealing state secrets and giving them to the Soviet Union. That’s why they had to create ASIO to create a barrier. They never even needed to have something like ASIO before World War II because our country was so homogenous that there just weren’t any traitors. So there was no traitors to deal with. [chuckling] That’s the power of a homogeneous society, what it can achieve.

 

But yeah. What do you think about compulsory martial arts for all boys? I think that’s a good policy. I think we need it.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s okay. I always said that you should give people a choice because forcing all people through the same pipeline doesn’t always produce, …

 

Joel Davis: Children don’t get choices. Children get forced into all kinds of shit! Children don’t get a choice:

 

“Hey, would you like to learn how to read? Would you like, . ?”

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, no, no, the choice is pretty, like it’s not that much different. I always thought, and I’ve had you disagree with me on this before. I thought you should be able to choose between two years military service or an apprenticeship in a specific trade such as carpentry, bricklaying, plumbing, something like that.

 

So you’re either demonstrating yourself as useful to defend the country as part of a huge reserve army, you know how to use weapons, et cetera, and you’ve also had your mind and body hardened by the military training. Or if you don’t want to do it’s not your thing, you can learn a valuable skill and become useful to the nation in that way. You don’t have to do it. You can do your apprenticeship and then choose to go into university or do something else. But I’ve always thought or said you shouldn’t be able to become a citizen until you complete two years military service or complete a trade. That’s what I think.

 

[58:10]

 

 

Joel Davis: I agree with compulsory military training. I don’t agree with people being forced to do a trade.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s because you’ve never done an apprenticeship. You don’t know how tough it can be. It’s tough on your mind and stuff on your body.

 

Joel Davis: I did, I was a locksmith apprentice, once upon a time.

 

Blair Cottrell: A locksmith? Did you? Yeah, but you need to do some time on the shovel, Joel! You need to dig some trenches!

 

Joel Davis: I’ve worked in construction, I’ve done my time on the shovel. I’ve worked in landscaping.

 

Blair Cottrell: Okay. When did you do that?

 

Joel Davis: In Sydney, when I was younger.

 

Blair Cottrell: But like, then you got to understand the value, right? Like, it’s great to have soldiers, but you’ve got to have people who can actually produce something, who can build, who can plumb, who can wire a house.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, everyone’s going to do that anyway. Everyone’s going to get a job anyway. The, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s not true, though. No. People don’t get a job unless they have to.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, you do have to. How are you going to get money?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, right now the government will give you money for being a retard!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, obviously we’re going to do something about that. We can’t have 18% of the country on NDIS or whatever it is. Like, it’s ridiculous!

 

Blair Cottrell: Look, all I say, I’m a big advocate of learning a trade. Even if you don’t stick with it. To me is of equal value to learning how to defend the country with like real military.

 

Joel Davis: Objectively, not of equal value if you’re at war. Obviously nothing is more valuable.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, obviously. Well, not necessarily because you still need amenities, you still need transport.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course, I’m not saying that being a tradie is bad or something, but what I’m saying is if you got a kid who’s going to become a lawyer or something, we don’t need to be a tradie first.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, no. I think it’s about character building in that case. So even if he never becomes a bricklayer, if he does three years bricklaying before he goes to university to learn to become a lawyer, he’s learnt about the grit, the reality, the harshness of reality through three years of bricklaying, which is hard labour, right? Not just the labour itself, but the way you’re treated by the guys who you’re going to be working under. It builds character.

 

Joel Davis: Everyone be a bricklayer?

 

Blair Cottrell: But look, think. Have you ever played a strategy game like Warcraft 3, for example, back when it first came out? You can’t do anything without the worker unit. You can’t build soldiers without the worker unit. You can’t mine minerals without the worker unit. The worker unit is the beginning of everything. Building strong workers with good spirit, good character is, I think, it’s possibly even more valuable than having soldiers.

 

Joel Davis: Well, what I think is that when it comes to compulsory military service, I don’t think that people should be forced to serve in foreign wars. We should only ever, and that’s actually in the Constitution. You can’t conscript people to fight foreign wars under the current Australian constitution. The only pretext for conscription would be if Australia was like, invaded and we were like fighting a war of national survival.

 

Blair Cottrell: And that’s the benefit of having like mandatory military.

 

Joel Davis: But you could still force everyone to train for a year. They wouldn’t have to get deployed, but you could at least make everyone train so everyone knows how to use a gun. Everyone knows how to, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But that’s the point. But then if Australia does get invaded, if everyone’s done, two years military service in order to achieve citizenship.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: They’ve at least trained a huge reserve army of like everyone who knows how to use a gun.

 

Joel Davis: If every boy in Australia grows up doing martial arts, grows up doing combat sports, then they go and do their military service, then you’ve just got an entire nation of fucking beasts! You know what I mean? Everyone can fight. And then your baseline is so much higher than any other country at that point. That, to me, that’s going to be our policies.

 

Blair Cottrell: But did you do martial arts?

 

Joel Davis: Being bricklayers, that’s a bit extremist for me. I’m too moderate.

 

Blair Cottrell: Hang on! I think I explained my case pretty well. I’m surprised that you don’t agree!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I just don’t think you need to force people into particular fields in the economy. I think people can pursue their own career path, obviously if they’re doing nothing. But everyone doesn’t have to do a trade.

 

Blair Cottrell: My perspective is one of the reasons we have a lot of the problems we have is because we have weak people in positions of leadership and they wouldn’t be weak if they did a trade when they were young.

 

[1:02:41]

 

Joel Davis: Well, I know plenty of tradies who are soft cunts! So I don’t know.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like these days they work differently, I suppose. Maybe it’s just the way I was worked.

 

Joel Davis: But like, also, there’s different trades too. Like I said, if you’re a Sparky [electrician], like, you just walk around just plugging things in. It’s not really that hard.

 

Blair Cottrell: You still crawl around inside ceilings, underneath houses, occasionally have to dig around in, …

 

Joel Davis: In like in awkward spaces. Like, how’s that special? Like, I don’t know.

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re providing electricity to the community. It’s very special.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, they get paid well. Sparkies get paid well. But we don’t need to make everyone be a Sparky to like have a society or something like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. I think we have a very spoiled generation who just think that things just happen! They think that guns just get made and buildings just. Lights just turn on and shit just works because that’s how things have always been for them. But when the shit hits the fan, man, you’re gonna need to have a lot of maintenance men. You’re gonna need some men who know how to build shit and maintain shit! Otherwise no one’s gonna know even where to start.

 

Joel Davis: You know, Australia has one of the highest, I think we have like the second highest builders per capita of like any country in the world.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, they’re all going broke right now too, like it’s hard, hard times out there because we’re bringing in a lot of foreign people who are undercutting local builders but then producing really shit houses!

 

Joel Davis: Garbage! Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And yeah, people just getting ripped off and going broke left, right and centre. You have to be a pretty reputable builder with a good reputation to survive out there. I heard that Matt Trihey, who’s still a builder and runs a protest group called National Workers Alliance in Melbourne, he was on with Graham on Offaly Offensive podcast, I heard. And hopefully they discuss a little about what it’s like to be a builder currently out there. Because I haven’t been in construction for a few years now and I’m not sure how the building situation actually looks with boots on the ground from that perspective. Hopefully they talk about it.

 

Joel Davis: So speaking of Matt, because obviously Matt took over the Melbourne wing of the March for Australia, and the next March for Australia he’s going to be heading up Melbourne again, I believe. There’s been some interesting developments in March for Australia world that I’m privy to.

 

What I’ve heard is that, and what I’ve seen, is that the Brisbane March for Australia people have now broken away. They’ve created their own website which is actually a couple months old, which indicates that this is premeditated, called Australiamarches.com or some shit like that! And they’re stealing the branding of March for Australia but at the same time separating themselves and saying:

 

“Oh, we’re not racist, and we’re not Nazis!”

 

And so on. And they’re trying to cuck everything out and they’re separated themselves from the rest of the March for Australia around the country. Because people who were paying attention would have noticed that in Brisbane, March for Australia turned into a bit of a cuck fest. Like in the first one, they had like some Indian guy give a song speech at a mass immigration rally. And then basically it just seems like the last one was just like all these politicians back to back to back giving speeches as like campaign pitches. And like the idea of March for Australia was supposed to be this like grassroots nationalist uprising against mass immigration. And in Brisbane they’ve kind of moderated the message:

 

“Oh, patriotism has nothing to do with racism!”

 

And here’s 3 [6] million speeches from politicians. And there was disputes. The national March for Australia team wanted to ban Gerard Rennick from giving a speech at the last one because he came out the week before the rally kind of with all these pro-immigration comments. We discussed it on the last stream, but he was allowed to speak anyway. He didn’t even mention immigration. There’s an anti-immigration rally. He didn’t even mention immigration because these organisers up in Brisbane have gone their own way.

 

And so that’s interesting because now that I guess there’s going to be a bit of a dispute between two different factions. The people in Sydney, the people in Melbourne, in other cities, are a lot more radical than the people up in Brisbane. It feels like in Brisbane there’s like this big conservative scene. Brisbane has become kind of the capital of conservatism in Australia. You know, like all the Right, the kind of smaller Right-wing parties are kind of based there, it seems, and they have CPAC there and it’s like the heartland of the Liberal Party and all of that. And there’s a lot of all White Boomers who moved up to Queensland and it’s a Whiter state, it’s an older state, it’s got a lot of conservative voters.

 

Whereas like in Sydney and Melbourne it’s gone Left-wing, there’s a lot of immigrants, there’s a lot of Lefties. But then the Right-wing is a lot more nationalist and a lot more radical. It’s kind of polarised. Whereas like in Brisbane it’s just like a conservative, you know, hug box.

 

[1:07:54]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s funny, is that things need to be worse, things need to be pretty bad before people stop trying to be the nice conservative guy and just accept the fight for what it is like I heard Elon Musk on Joe Rogan Show recently. There was a clip of him and he was saying that:

 

“There is no perfect way to do deportations. That if you’re seeking perfection, it won’t happen.”

 

What he means by that is if you’re trying to be nice about deportations because they were talking about how there’s a conspiracy within the Democrat Party in Australia [America] to bring in as many illegals as possible because then they then count those votes through some voter fraud system. And that’s how they’re trying to keep themselves in power or regain power in that country’s system. And Musk was saying that deporting illegals is basically the main priority of the Trump administration because that’s one of the ways they can prevent the Democrats from leveraging that whole corrupt system to gain power, the illegal immigration system.

 

But anyway, he was saying that if you’re going to try to be like morally good, to be the nice guy and perfect how deportations happen, it just won’t happen! You’ve just got to like literally grab people and remove them. You’ve got to be mean, you’ve got to be nasty. You’ve got to understand that this is like an attack on your country.

 

And there’s a similar situation with conservatives in Australia where no one’s willing to just “be mean”. No one’s willing to understand that this is a fight for our survival. Right. It’s like everyone’s still trying to be the nice guy:

 

“I don’t want to say anything mean. I don’t upset those people over there.”

 

And I suppose things are still that way in Brisbane because things just aren’t bad enough in Brisbane yet? Come down and stay in Melbourne for a couple of months and you’ll realise how concern like bullshit trying to be the nice guy is. You realise how much of a waste of time it is trying to not be racist and not upset those people over there. It’s just that time is done down here in Melbourne! It’s done in Sydney as well! But I suppose Brisbane still needs to arrive at that realisation.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s part of it. I think that’s part of it. But also what’s part of it, I think, is that the institutional strength of the Right-wing there is such that they’ve kind of hijacked things. Before the first March for Australia, there were people that were behind the scenes trying to get involved and they wanted to bring in people from the One Nation Party and bring in people from this Right-wing minor party and that Right-wing minor party. And that’s one of the reasons why the NSN stuck our nose in it because we were like:

 

“No, fuck off!”

 

Because we had to secure it from being kind of watered down and turned into, just like a campaign opportunity for all these politicians. It’s not about the politicians, it’s about the rest of us! It’s about the fact that the politicians have failed us. It’s about the fact that there are no good politicians. We’re trying to create a new generation that could provide an alternative.

 

But the establishment is complicit. Even the Right-wingers that are somewhat better are still complicit because they haven’t offered anywhere near enough of a resistance, a meaningful enough of a resistance. That’s why March for Australia came into existence because no one was, I guess other than us, was doing it! Was saying what needed to be said anyway.

 

Of course they saw the numbers swell and the opportunity to gain legitimacy and whatever. And so then they started jumping on it late. But then they said:

 

“Oh but if you want, we’ll bring in money so you can have security and big stages and good speakers and like a speaker system and everything. But in order to get our A list speakers to give speeches, we can’t have the Nazis there and we can we can’t say things this way and we can’t say things that way and everything has to be toned down.”

 

And they were all told:

 

“To get fucked!”

 

But the people who kind of played ball were the guys in Brisbane. The guys in Brisbane were the ones that played ball with those types. And now it’s basically been a conspiracy to usurp not just the March for Australia Brisbane, but I think they want to try and take the whole thing. They’re not going to be able to.

 

Blair Cottrell: Unfortunately for them it’s not speakers and better electrical equipment that’s spark political upheaval and even revolutionary politics. It’s personalities.

 

So I don’t think the Liberal Party can produce the personalities to actually keep the March for Australia going. But is it the Liberal Party that’s actually doing this? Are they behind that?

 

Joel Davis: I don’t think it’s a Liberal Party. I think it’s the conservative establishment, let’s say.

 

Blair Cottrell: Who is that? And is that like all the T-shirt salesmen?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, there’s a series of influencers. People that are associated, on the fringes of Sky News, people that are associated with all these different One Nation, these other political parties, the Andrew Hastie wing of the Liberal Party, that whole spectrum. The professional protesters who are always doing protests all the time, the well oiled machine protesters that every time there’s an issue they pop up and try and do, … The people that were doing the September 13, a lot of the people involved in that this is what I’m talking about. There’s a whole kind of like industry. It’s nowhere near as big as it is in America, thank God, but there’s an industry of like professional conservatism, let’s say, that’s not in the Liberal Party. It’s like outside it. And sometimes there’s a cross pollination with it. And it’s those people and, …

 

[1:13:29]

 

Blair Cottrell: They’ll kill it, won’t they? If they do get control of it.

 

Joel Davis: We’re not going to be able to win this by being nice. That’s what they wanted. They want to nice guy our way to it.

 

Blair Cottrell: They don’t want to win it, though. They probably don’t want to win it. They probably just want to get control of it, leverage it, milk it for all it’s worth, or whatever they can get from it until it dies. That’s it!

 

And it will die in their hands. Because they just don’t know how to handle that kind of like, they see it as a marketing opportunity. They see it as a way to make some money. They see it as a way to divert some votes here and there, and that’s it. And that’s what they’ll do. They’ll just milk it for that purpose. They won’t see the energy, they won’t see the potential. They won’t use that energy for anything truly revolutionary, truly meaningful, to create an upheaval, to create a counterculture, to build momentum for a great change, like for a great purpose, which is going to change politics somehow. It’s just like:

 

“All right, how can we make some money out of these people? How can we sort of divert their votes in a direction which is favourable to our sponsors? And then how can we just move on after that and wipe our hands clean of it?”

 

That will be the conservative approach, the merchant approach to the March for Australia.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the “Merch for Australia”. So Brisbane is going to turn into grifter slop garbage, unfortunately. But Sydney and Melbourne, I think Perth and the other cities should stay solid. So for this is for Australia Day, of course, the next one is on Australia Day [Jan 26, 2026]. And that I remember when the idea of doing the August 31st March came up. Part of what made me excited to do it was thinking two steps ahead. Not just that it in of itself would be a great day and that it would be a powerful expression of national sentiment and so on. But I was thinking if that is a success, then you can then leverage that to then call the patriots back out on Australia Day. Because of course, everyone remembers what happened last Australia Day. Last Australia Day, we did our march in Adelaide. We had our national conference in Adelaide, you know, at the beginning of the year. And we were mass arrested for trying to celebrate our national holiday.

 

Meanwhile, you know, every city in Australia has these huge Invasion Day communist-Aboriginal fuck Australia, fuck White people protests! And it’s just outrageous! It’s outrageous that our cities get overrun by that every year on our national holiday. And there’s no proper celebration of our national holiday that Australia is under attack.

 

Blair Cottrell: How is that not disfavorable to social cohesion? It’s like you guys are the only thing affecting or having any sort of negative effect on how people feel about the state of social cohesion in Australia. But having like, what are they, what are they? These rallies against like Australia Day Invasion Day protests with people holding signs saying Burn Australia Down:

 

“Oh, that’s all fine. No threat to social cohesion there. No need for special AFP task forces! No need to disrupt and dissuade those people from their activities. No need to talk about that at all!”

 

It’s only nationalism that’s a threat to Australia, apparently.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Like, so being anti-Australia is sweet, but being pro-Australia is the worst possible thing. That’s literally like we live in the inverted, … Obviously everyone watching this gets it. We live in the total inversion.

 

Blair Cottrell: Wish we could be a fly on the wall. Like watching certain task forces and police officers get briefed on like Right-wing groups, the sort of shit that they would get fed about Right-wing groups.

 

Joel Davis: I know what they get fed! Because I’ve been pulled over with Jack Eltis. I remember we got pulled over by the Raptor Squad. This was last year. And the Raptor Squad are like an anti-bikie task force, which is for the benefit of the audience. And they were just like, Jack was driving and they were giving Jack like tickets for not indicating left when exiting roundabouts and just trying to fuck with him, you know, stuff that like police never care about, that no one, like stupid laws on the books, technically that no one obeys. And I said:

 

“Qu do you feel good about yourself? I mean, this is fucking pathetic! You guys are fucking pathetic!”

 

And they said:

 

“Well, you guys are terrorists!”

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that what they said?

 

Joel Davis:

 

“What!”

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s because before they go out to disrupt and engage with you guys and whatever you’re doing, someone from the government or someone from police command briefs them and says:

 

“These guys are terrorists. They will stab you, they will kill you! So go hard on them!”

 

That’s what they will get told. And these rank, these cops, you know what do you call it? Rank and file cops, they would just gobble that up because they’re paid to gobble it up, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: So who is it, who is it that’s lying to police and calling a group of people engaging in political protest “terrorists”? Who’s doing that? Wouldn’t that be illegal? Oh, I forgot. We don’t have any actual standards or rules. We’re not a real democracy. So nothing’s really illegal, is it?

 

[1:18:37]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, if myself, I know this is true. Also, I remember I’ve been in the car driving home from night out with Jacob Hersant and they got his licence and put it into the system and they’re like:

 

“Oh!”

 

And one cop pointed to the other and said:

 

“Oh, Counter Terrorism watch!”

 

Like he’s on a counter terrorism watch list. What act of terrorism has Jacob Hersant committed? None! He just conveys his political views in public that offend people’s feelings and that’s “terrorism”.

 

But yeah, they brief the police that we, they literally have political police in this country as we have been discussing. We have political police in this country that are basically briefed on so-called Right-wing extremism, nationalism, as the greatest threat to our country. And that people like us say that it’s the immigrants that are a threat to the country and so on, when it actually is! Like people like us say the truth and then. But apparently we’re the threats for saying the truth!

 

But anyway, my point is that the Australian people know, the average Aussie knows that Australia Day is under attack and that it’s under attack because they’re under attack, because we’re under attack as a people. And they attack our day because they’re attacking the legitimacy of our whole country because they’re attacking us and our claim to this country.

 

And so if you look at the opinion polls, Australia Day has become more popular in recent years because people are feeling defiant. That’s what happens when you attack people existentially.

 

And so what I think is necessary spiritually for this country is for the cities to be just covered in Australian flags and patriots on Australia Day because then the media will say that it’s racist and that we’re all Nazis, … Some of us are Nazis. They’re going to put us all over the television. We’re going to be ready for it, but they’re going to make it all about that.

 

And then the average Australian is going to be sitting at home and says:

 

“Isn’t that what’s supposed to happen on Australia Day? Aren’t we supposed to celebrate Australia Day? Aren’t we Australia?”

 

Blair Cottrell: You know what’s funny is a lot of recently arrived immigrants are confused about that too. Like, when people who have just arrived in Australia, they hear about Australia Days happening soon, they sometimes, like, show up in a public place with Australian flags and stuff because they’re like:

 

“Wow, we’re citizens. I can’t believe we’re in Australia. We’re so happy to be here!”

 

And then there’s like White Leftists, like blonde people with Aboriginal T-shirts on, just throwing bricks at them and screaming:

 

“You fucking racist!”

 

Like, [chuckling] could you imagine how confused you would be?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but that’s the thing. Like, last year, they were able to make it look like we’re this fringe crazy group. And people got very emotional. They were like:

 

“Well they shouldn’t be getting arrested for celebrating Australia Day, singing Waltzing Matilda. That’s fucked up!”

 

And we knew they were going to arrest us and that we’d create that optics trap. But how edifying would it be to then fast forward one year and it’s just tens of thousands and it’s all over the country and it’s like:

 

“Arrest this! What are you going to do this time?”

 

Then Australians need to remind one another that we’re still here and that we haven’t given up yet and that has an intangible quality. Some people say:

 

“What’s the point of marching in the street?”

 

And so on. But it has an intangible quality. And this wouldn’t be a protest. This would be a celebration. And the Lefties, they’re already protesting us regardless of whether we show up or not. They do it every year. They’re the protesters. Let them be the protests. We can be the ones celebrating who we are on our national holiday.

 

And I think this Australia Day will be incredible! I think if you’re not marching for Australia Day this year, you’re a fake patriot. I mean, you just have to get out there because, … Yeah, you just have to! We have to take our cities back. It’s like a matter of honour. Do you agree? I presume you must agree.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, what am I agreeing with exactly? That people should fly the flag of their country proudly on Australia Day and celebrate Australia Day.

 

Joel Davis: But then we should march, like in the cities, like with March for Australia.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, the local governments used to facilitate those marches. I think it was cancelled during the pandemic. The Australia Day parades, the traditional ones, were cancelled during the Covid pandemic for health reasons, for your “safety”. Because it’s not like any evil is ever done in the name of your safety.

 

And then they were just never reinstated. So after like Covid just vanished overnight after everyone got vaccinated because that’s all they cared about was injecting everybody with the shit that ended up causing heart attacks that they never talked about. Once they got what they wanted in that regard, well, everything just went back to normal. And the marches, the Australia Day parades were never reinstated.

 

So we should just have our own parades. I guess, like everyone should just get out on the streets and march through the city organically. You don’t need the government to tell you it’s okay to do it. Just go and do it for your country.

 

[1:23:45]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’d be a fun day out. So I’m really looking forward to it. That was like, I’ve had this vision in my mind for some time,. So and I think it’d be powerful. And then we’re going to be doing our conference, our national conference that weekend and be launching, we’ll probably be launching the political party around then. I don’t know exactly when we’re going to do that, if we’re going to try and bundle it together or do it separately. We haven’t exactly decided on that timing. But you know, next year is going to be a big one for us and for nationalism and what a way to kick it off.

 

So anyway, because of all of that, and that’s a beautiful vision, great things to think about. Is really disappointing what’s happened in Brisbane. And I think it’s going to turn into a big drama and this is going to be like the animating kind of battle lines, I guess, of the next phase of where it’s going to be the containment Right, the remnants of the conservative establishment trying to rebrand themselves as anti-immigration populists, even though they’re not really that sincere about it and are just kind of grifting off it or trying to angle it for their narrow political purposes.

 

But it’s basically just maintaining “conservatism incorporated”, you know, maintaining the inertia of that whole structure of compromise and cowardice versus the re-emergence of real grassroots nationalism, trying to use that intergenerational energy, the energy of the White youth fueling the rise of a real nationalist movement. And the battle between these two forces and picking a side between these two forces is going to be the animating battle of the next few years. And like you can see that’s also kind of true, I think in not just in this situation but in America as well.

 

Like recent developments over there where I’m just seeing the old guard, … The difference I think between the Americans and us is that there’s more of a conservative establishment. So it’s like in America they’re fighting over control of the conservative establishment. Like nationalists are trying to like claim the conservative establishment and redirect it towards their ends.

 

Whereas in Australia the conservative establishment isn’t worth trying to like take over. Like it’s a joke! You should just push it over, just blow it up, get rid of it, replace it, beat it!

 

Blair Cottrell: By blow it up you don’t mean like actually blow it up, right?

 

Joel Davis: No, not literally planting bombs or something of that nature, but like, it’s a metaphor. But ASIO don’t care at this point that we’re not violent, that we’re not terrorists.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah apparently. You’re being treated as though you are anyway.

 

Joel Davis: So ASIO, stop with fucking us! Feds, stop fucking with us! We’re gonna try and take this in a political direction. We’re going to go away from the kind of more terroristic angle that you guys don’t like and we’re going to move into a peaceful political solution orientation. Allow us to do it! Because if you actually care about terrorism in the sense of you want to stop it, the only way that you’re going to stop it is by giving people with our views an outlet to express them within the system.

 

If you lock us out so that we can’t participate in the system, that’s how you’re going to create, … And ASIO said this themselves, like Mike Burgess* has said this himself, that he doesn’t expect us to commit terrorism. He expects some random guy who’s a nationalist, who gets black pilled, who thinks the movement has got no hope, goes off as a lone wolf and does some crazy shit! But they don’t even care about that. They’re not talking about terrorism anymore because they know they can’t make that stick on us. So now they’re just talking about what, …

 

[* Michael Paul Burgess is an Australian intelligence official, and the current Director-General of Security in charge of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO). Prior to his appointment to this role on 16 September 2019, Burgess was director-general of the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD). Burgess was born in England, and immigrated to Adelaide, South Australia in 1973 at the age of seven. He was the first member of his family to study in higher education, receiving a degree in electrical engineering from the South Australian Institute of Technology in 1988.]

 

Blair Cottrell: What happens when like literally everyone who ever supported NSN or White Australia ends up feeling that way. Because as soon as they tried to form a political party, the police just went even harder to disrupt them from doing that. And there was no chance of them actually having a voice or any representation. [chuckling] It’s like you guys when you were just hosting protests, making social media posts. Like two years ago, things weren’t that bad. I mean, you had some minor problems with police, but mostly it was just journalists giving you shit in the media.

 

But now you want to form a political party, you’re almost on the way to doing it, you’re making real progress. And now all of a sudden the whole Federal Police service is forming task forces and openly admitting that they’re going to do everything possible to “disrupt you from forming a political party”. It’s like they go even harder when you actually try to establish yourself or establish some sort of legitimate political representation.

 

So if I were an intelligence agent, I’d be sitting there scratching my head thinking:

 

“What’s the real problem here? Is it these guys trying to form a political party and obey the law? Or is it whoever’s in government mobilising the police into special task forces to harass, disrupt and set those guys up on bullshit charges for trying to form a political party? Maybe we need to look a little deeper into the actual system. Maybe the system’s the problem!”

 

Joel Davis: This is an interesting, … So meanwhile, while they’re treating us as the problem, is this:

 

“ASIO boss Mike Burgess warns of realistic possibility foreign government could attempt to kill a dissident in Australia.”

 

This article came out today.

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s that in relation to? What foreign government?

 

Joel Davis: I’ll read it out:

 

“Delivering the 2025 Lowy Lecture on Tuesday, he said, ‘this threat is real. We believe there are at least three nations willing and capable of conducting lethal targeting. It is entirely possible the regimes would try to hide their involvement by hiring criminal cutouts, as Iran did when directing its arson attack’.”

 

So he’s still pushing this nonsense that Iran was behind the synagogue arson attacks when obviously it was the fucking jews!

 

[1:30:09]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s weird! It’s like, why would Iran do that? What benefit is there for Iran?

 

Joel Davis: There is no benefit.

 

Blair Cottrell: It could very possibly be someone acting through Iran to make it look like it’s Iran.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the jews! We know that Israel have penetrated Iran because when they had their war earlier this year, Mossad were conducting targeted assassinations inside Tehran of their top political and military officials. So it shows that Mossad have guys on the inside, that they’ve fully penetrated the Iranian system and establishment and so on.

 

So they could easily make, they could easily pay, you know, gangs here to do fire-bombings of synagogues and then make it look like they were Iranian or something. What a load of garbage!

 

But yeah, paying organised crime. So it came out, Mark Latham brought this up as well recently that he asked the, I think the police commissioner in New South Wales about, because they have something called Strike Force Pearl, which is their anti-semitism special task force or something. And he said:

 

“Of all the arrests they made in response to anti-semitic, you know, arson attacks and graffiti incidents and whatever, how many were organised crime?”

 

And they said:

 

“All of them!”

 

All of them were organised crime.

 

So it’s not anti-semites doing it. Someone’s paying, you know, biker gangs and shit to do it. Why? Why would they be doing that? Well, what was the net result? The net result? Did any jews get hurt? No.

 

So it wasn’t to get the jews. The net result was to basically provide a context, a pretext for the jewish lobby and its satellites in the media and Sky News. What does Mark Latham call it? “Sky jews”. And instead of the Daily Telegraph, he says the “Daily Tel Aviv”. For the jewish media and the jewish lobby to pressure successfully the government into passing Hate Speech laws.

 

So obviously it was the fucking jews that paid the gangsters. I mean, one plus one equals two.

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe they know that, maybe ASIO knows that. But they’re publicly running with the “oh, Iran did it”, to make Israel think they’re not on to them. I mean, that’s a long shot.

 

But what they say publicly doesn’t always need to line up with what they actually know. They’re an intelligence agency, so they could be playing a long game.

 

Joel Davis: This is interesting. In this article, it’s supposed to be about foreign governments attempting to kill dissidents. And you were just talking about how you think they could try to kill me potentially, if I get too successful. Or you, or our friends. What he says here:

 

“Angry, alienated individuals are embracing anti-authority ideologies and conspiracy theories, engaging in uncivil debate and unpeaceful protest.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Where’s that happen?

 

Joel Davis:

 

“The aggrieved, not necessarily espouse violent views. It may see violence as a legitimate way to affect political societal change. The way nationalist and racist violent extremists attempted to leverage the so-called March for Australia rallies is a case in point. The biggest neo-Nazi group, the National Socialist Network, or White Australia as it is rebranding itself, identified the demonstrations as a vehicle to raise its profile. It strategically and opportunistically exploited the organisers complaints about immigration and the cost of living. Even if the organisation does not engage in terrorism, I remain deeply concerned by its hateful, divisive rhetoric and increasingly violent propaganda?”

 

What do you mean violent propaganda?

 

Blair Cottrell: Hang on, did Burgess say that specifically?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah!:

 

“And the growing likelihood these things will prompt spontaneous violence, particularly in response to perceived provocation.”

 

So what this is saying:

 

“We might upset people who will then attack us, and that this is therefore irresponsible.”

 

What a joke!

 

Blair Cottrell: So he’s actually referencing members of Australian nationalism or specifically White Australia as potential targets for assassination. Is that what he’s saying?

 

Joel Davis: I haven’t seen those explicit comments here, but I’m still reading:

 

“While nationalist and racist violent extremists make up the significant majority of our investigations into ideologically motivated extremism.”

 

So still the majority of ASIO’s work is on us. I mean, it’s crazy to think about how many people working in these federal agencies are just focused on the boys, like literally us!

 

Blair Cottrell: Fucking crazy! Especially when you see the boys and like you know them. They’re literally just normal guys.

 

Joel Davis: Like they’re watching right now! There’s like feds watch, like they watch every episode of this shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, they have to.

 

Joel Davis: Like you’re fucking pathetic! Hi feds! Fuck you! Ike, what a joke.

 

Blair Cottrell: When he said, when Burgess said that White Australia or you guys utilise concerns about immigration to exploit or gain your profile or whatever as a political force. Doesn’t literally every fucking political group or party that ever existed do the same thing?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, One Nation is trying to exploit it for themselves. The Liberal Party tries to exploit it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Massive realisation, bro! Like literally that’s what politics is. You leverage an environment and situation to your advantage. Like as long as it’s not violent, it’s legal. But that’s changing right now, isn’t it?

 

Joel Davis: If people attack us and we fight back. And he says:

 

“Oh, they’re provoking violence.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s very concerning.

 

Anyway, continue.

 

Joel Davis: Since, oh, he’s just going on about fucking October [7th] 2023, anti-Israel, blah, blah, blah. All he cares about is people doing nationalism or being anti-Israel. It’s just like political policing. Like the positions of the state is that:

 

“White people bad, jews good! And we want to enforce that.”

 

That’s all he’s saying, basically.

 

[1:36:26]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: I think the days are almost gone, where you can sit on streams like this and talk like we’re talking now, I don’t think this will be possible in another year or two. Maybe even sooner than that. I think the world we grew up in where you can just observe how ridiculous the government is or how unjustly you’re being treated by government agencies, by police, and you can just openly discuss that or draw attention to it. I almost think those days are gone. We’re almost done with that.

 

Like, you’ll be streaming like this and they’ll just come into your house and smash your camera and arrest you over some like. [chuckling] I actually believe that we’re going to go through a time like that pretty soon. I feel it in my gut. Yeah, we’re almost done with this. This will be a thing of the past pretty soon.

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know. I think it’s a bit much. I don’t think.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think you’ll be surprised. Australia is very corrupt.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it is corrupt. It is corrupt, but I don’t think they have the ability to do that.

 

But anyway, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, they’re already raiding people on no evidence. Like they’re just coming into your house and saying:

 

“Oh, you did this!”

 

They don’t have any fucking proof. And they’re just using that as an excuse to take all your shit! So they’re doing it already.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, it’s not really the same thing though, is it? Because you don’t, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, it’s only one step away. Like, it’s basically within the same tier.

 

Joel Davis: That’s like, they use the, “the process is the punishment” type thing, but they are not actually succeeding in getting the punishment in those scenarios. I mean, Tom just represented himself from a jail cell over zoom in court and won the other day.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but he’s still in jail.

 

Joel Davis: Well, he’s in jail for running up a hill and hitting people. Like, it’s, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Partly. It’s like 25 other charges as well.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I mean, obviously what’s happening to him is unfair, but it’s like I push back against this, like catastrophizing:

 

“Oh, they’re just gonna round us all up and put us in jail anytime now.”

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, if you look at what’s happening, like if you just observe the pattern of their activity, what they do is when they don’t get a result by going or by increasing their activity in regards to like taking a more aggressive approach. When they don’t get the result they want by taking a more aggressive approach, they just become more aggressive again to try to get a result. And if that doesn’t work, then they just get more aggressive again. That’s the pattern of behaviour I’m seeing from the current political policing government system. So based on that pattern, it’s just mathematical certainty that they’re just going to become more aggressive.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but at the end of the day, like they don’t have the ability to just arrest, …

 

Blair Cottrell: They do have that.

 

Joel Davis: They still have to win in court. You’ll win in court and then you make them look stupid. Like there’s a limit., …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I agree. That can take years. But then it depends on how compromised the judges are as well. So there’s still variables there to consider.

 

And like they really do have the ability, they have the ability to do whatever they want. There’s just words on paper that they need to manipulate to make it seem legit.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, there’s legitimacy though. Like if they push too hard, particularly as we’re building this political party, if they push too hard against us, you know, it will be too delegitimizing. So they have, …

 

Blair Cottrell: There is that. But then you can argue that they’ll just make it exclusively about you and your ideology, and they’ll get everyone to agree on those terms. So it can’t happen to anyone else, but it can happen to these Nazis because of “how abhorrent they are”. And everyone will be like, “yes”! In Parliament. I think they made a law. Do you know who Julian Knight is? He was that guy who shot a bunch of police officers. Maybe Huddle Street Massacre, Was it Huddle Street?

 

Anyway, he’s in jail and he was eligible for parole a while ago. Did he get parole recently? I can’t remember. Maybe he did, maybe he didn’t. But Parliament made a law specifically to keep him in jail because he was considered such a villain of society, specifically to keep him in jail. So reason I’m telling you that is because though they can just try to make laws specifically to stop you guys registering exclusively, and they’ll claim that that’s, …

 

Joel Davis: Like, if they want to try and do that. And then I’m happy to go to the High Court. We’ll win. I’m pretty confident, like, it’s unconstitutional.

 

Blair Cottrell: I hope. So yeah.

 

Joel Davis: And then it will just be like, good publicity.

 

Blair Cottrell: And I’m not being. I’m not taking a black pill here. Like, if you just look at the pattern of behaviour, like I said, of the Australian government and policing system, this is what they’re gonna do, I reckon. Because they just get more and more aggressive, more and more.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, they’re playing games.

 

But the problem that they have is the police try to go further than what the laws actually allow them to. They’re getting ahead of themselves. They’re not going about it with the Right progression. It’s not the policy, …

 

[1:41:29]

 

Blair Cottrell: Where’s the incentive for them not to do that, though? Because they do that and then there’s no punishment. There’s no drawback for them. The charges against you that didn’t hold up in court and that took a year for you to sort of clear your name of two years. Well, you still have to go through all of that process and then the charges just get dropped or you get found not guilty or whatever. And then there’s no actual consequence for the police for taking two years of your life.

 

Joel Davis: There aren’t any consequence for me either. I got a bunch of court dates I have to call into, and I got held in a jail cell for a few hours. Like, I don’t give a fuck! Like, it doesn’t really change anything for me.

 

Blair Cottrell: So I just think there should be an immediate and pretty severe consequence for police, for the prosecution department, if they lay charges on you that end up just getting dropped or you found not guilty. You shouldn’t have to go through like a second lawsuit process that takes another two fucking years and costs another $40,000 to try to get like some sort of justice against malicious prosecution. It should just be like some sort of immediate consequence. Like the prosecutor who signed off on the bullshit charge should just get sacked straight away! Maybe his whole team, something like that.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I agree with that, but that’s not gonna, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Especially when we have a system where there’s no real punishment for just being malicious as a prosecutor or as a police officer. You can just do it and then later, oh the judge finds that this isn’t legit, so throws it out and then the cops just goes home laughing anyway. Because he’s still robbed you of all that time and energy and money!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but that’s what happens. It’s just like this circle jerk where we just get jerked around. Obviously there’s an exception when it comes to. When they allege, like, an assault or something that’s separate. But when it comes to these speech crimes and political machinations, it’s just this. It’s just this big, like, jerk around that then ultimately doesn’t actually result in very serious punishments, or if there’s even a conviction.

 

So it’s like, I just don’t really care that much. And you kind of let it. That’s the thing. That’s why I do find it annoying the catastrophizing, because that’s like, part of what it is. It’s like to create fear so that people think:

 

“Oh, well, like, we can’t do anything because the police stop us.”

 

And it’s like:

 

“Okay, but they haven’t stopped us yet. They haven’t actually stopped us.”

 

And so it shows that if they could just stop us so easily, they would have by now. But they can’t. Like, there’s limitations on what they can do, and we’re skirting on the edge. But they don’t have the ability to just like an easy, like, snap us in half option because they would have taken it by now.

 

Blair Cottrell: They’re trying to create one. The limitations are changing fast.

 

Joel Davis: They’re trying to.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what we’re observing right now!

 

Joel Davis: They haven’t actually come up with a formula on how to do it yet. They haven’t figured out how to do it. They’ve got all these think tanks and lobby groups and they’ve passed all these different laws and they do all these meetings and have all the, … And they still haven’t fucking done it yet.

 

So to me, that demonstrates something. You know, you got to take stock of that you have been around for a while. Tom’s been around for a while. Like this isn’t like something that just popped up in the last year that they’re dealing with. They haven’t figured out how to deal with it. All they’ve done is kind of amplify us and make us more famous. They haven’t figured out the method. And using like policing tactics to deal with something like this is the wrong way. If they wanted to beat us, the way you beat us is by creating a fake opposition movement that basically is kind of nationalist, but it’s still controlled by them. And you bring all the people that would otherwise support us into that alternative. But they can’t do that they don’t have the skills to do that and they don’t have the personnel to do that. And they don’t have the ability to concede that because they’re so ideologically fixated that even like the ZOG version of us, they would be still too offended by it, to allow it to exist.

 

So yeah, I think we should do some Superchats. Unless you can respond to that, but we could do some Superchats.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, it sounds like a good idea. It’s been a good discussion. Pretty intense talking points and topics. But it’s an intense environment down here in Australia right now, isn’t it?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah it is.

 

But yeah, Sign up to the party! Sign up to the fucking party! Like seriously. Mr. Marshwood said:

 

“What’s your take on the mischling* question?”

 

Well, I don’t even know what you mean by the mischling question. Like, yeah, do I agree with the Nuremberg Laws? Maybe they’re a little bit too lenient I would say.

 

[* Mischling was a pejorative legal term which was used in NS Germany to denote persons of mixed “Aryan” and “non-Aryan”, such as Jewish, ancestry as they were classified by the Nuremberg racial laws of 1935. In German, the word has the general denotation of ‘hybrid’, ‘mongrel’, or ‘half-breed’. Outside its use in official Nazi terminology, the term Mischlingskinder was later used to refer to war babies born to non-White soldiers and German mothers in the aftermath of World War II. Wikipedia]

 

But you know, from what I’ve seen like an Ashkenazi jew is like 70% White, 30% Levantine.

 

So if someone is like, so the Germans, if you’re between 1/2 and 1/8 jewish, you’d be classified as a Mischling, which meant that you weren’t classified as a full jew. Or you could stay in Germany but you couldn’t like work in like government or the media or any like sensitive position.

 

But if you were like 1/8 jewish or less, then you could be considered like a full German and you could do most things other than join the SS which had like 100% blood purity requirements. So like, is that what you’re asking? Like, I mean, I’m not going to criticise it. At the time it was probably a reasonable law. I would probably go about things a little bit differently today. And because the primary issue isn’t really like jewish mixing, it’s like other non-Whites who are, if jews are like mostly White with some admixture when they mix in, it’s a bit different than if someone’s like Asian or black or something because it’s more of a genetic divergence. So you have to be way more strict. Hazel Mango said:

 

“Why did you move to Sydney, Joel?”

 

I don’t really want to get into all the details of my personal life, but I’m from Sydney, so I kind of just like moved back. Oz88 said:

 

“Are there niggers in heaven?”

 

No! What do you think, Blair? Are there niggers in heaven?

 

[1:48:05]

 

Blair Cottrell: Are there black people in heaven? I’m sure there’s been some noble black people who have done some noble stuff. I think it’s pretty dismissive to say, …

 

Joel Davis: I’d say they’re not going to the same place we’re going.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, I don’t know, man! I don’t know. Do you believe in heaven, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: Not really, no. But like let’s say you did. Like let’s just say like for argument’s sake, like we’re on board with that. Do you think? Are we going to be, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, considering that, …

 

Joel Davis: Like what’s up my nigger?

 

Blair Cottrell: Like considering that like having that racial admixture creates an earthly hell, I can’t imagine the most ideal, it’s not really living conditions, like an afterlife, the most pristine existence would be multi-ethnic. It’s probably going to be very orderly and homogeneous, you would think.

 

But some people believe that heaven is like your own version of perfect. It’s like a perfect time in your past that you envision. You just kind of keep living in that.

 

What would your version of heaven be? What would you like, do you want? Are you like one of those 72 virgins kind of guys? Or do you have like, …

 

Joel Davis: No, I’m not a fucking Muslim. No, I think that’s a meme idea. I mean I like the notion of Valhalla where it’s just like basically you just fight all day and then pretty much until everyone dies. And then you like respawn, have a big piss up, party all night and then wake up the next morning and fight the death again.

 

And then you like respawn, have a party and it just goes like that forever. That sounds pretty cool to me. It’s like playing video games. I was thinking you can just play like GTA like IRL every day with your mates. Like imagine if we could kill each other. But you don’t have to feel bad because like you’ll see me tomorrow. Like just respawn, like be funny as fuck! I’ll kill you all the time.

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re like laughing about it. You’re like, bro, your skull exploded yesterday! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. [chuckling] But yeah. Do you have a dream of niggers? Because personally, in my dreams, everyone’s always White. I’m not just saying that to be edgy.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s a good point, actually. Well, I’ve never really had a close relationship with anyone who’s black. And so there’s not really effective, like memory data of interacting with someone who’s black.

 

So I suppose I don’t dream about it because there’s nothing for my brain to draw upon. Because I tend to dream about scenarios that I have experienced. But then there’s all this extra stuff like expansion content bolted on and it turns into something different. I’m sure if I knew a black guy that I probably would dream on occasion about a black guy, but I just, …

 

Joel Davis: You don’t dream about niggers! That’s!

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, do you?

 

Joel Davis: No!

 

Blair Cottrell: Why are we being asked these questions? What are these questions? Is this Superchats?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Tollah the Gotcha Joel bro:

 

“When’s your next debate? Get it done. That wog faggot on TikTok who dodged you is a coward! Who else is on the horizon apart from Avi and others?”

 

I don’t know. I don’t really have. I mean, everyone. I don’t know. I got to change my approach because it seems like when I try to debate people, I must be intimidating them. I must be coming on too strong. And they keep running away. In the debate world. I’m like the, desperate incel, who the girl replies to my text and then I spam her with like 45 texts about how she’s the one.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, [chuckling] you got to control that man!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I gotta play hard to get.

 

Blair Cottrell: Too keen. This young axe is too keen. That’s his problem.

 

Joel Davis: Treat ‘em mean, keep ‘em keen. Or something. But it’s like the opposite. I’m like, too mean!

 

[1:52:24]

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[2:45:15]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 11/9/2025 = 43, latest comments at top)

PongTheBoy
9 hours ago
you fuckinf idiots are single handedly destroying the end immigration movement your gay little marches don’t do anything but scare normies and empower the left and j’s.. fuck both of you retards hopefully you get locked up so us with a brain are able to take over the movement
0 likes

AndrewGalvin
1 day ago
What’s been up with Blair recently, it’s like he has no vril and spirit anymore. He started playing video games on stream and doesn’t seem to care as much.
3 likes

AndrewGalvin
1 day ago
Can we get Jacob on
1 like

CH484D_60Y1M
1 day ago
PATRIOTS organize – DIGITAL ID! TEXAS! Show of force as a protest is a must, Urgent Constitutionally legal show of force, armed assembly ! https://rumble.com/v71d4ei-patriots-organize-digital-id-texas-show-of-force-is-a-must.html
1 like

AussiePermaculture
1 day ago
My intuition is telling me things are going to get really good unexpectedly.
1 like

TheShowgun
VerifiedSupporter+
2 days ago
Literally laughed very loudly at Blair’s complete ignorance of JD Vance
0 likes

okkkkkk4
2 days ago
Best podcast in the world. Free tom. Blair says things that may happen and Joel says why they won’t lol
0 likes

ProvingNihil
2 days ago
Nice Joy Division shirt Joel!
1 like

jonottawa
2 days ago
It’s time to cut Blair loose. Every answer, every take, sets off alarm bells. Watch through the show again and tell me I’m wrong. He’s either a fed or his heart is no longer in it.
-1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
HeronNow
Supporter+
13 hours ago
YOU’RE WRONG
0 likes

Girnigoe
2 days ago
I don’t think Blair is ever being negative. Someone must play ‘devil’s advocate. As to what ZOG will do to you, look what they’ve done to everyone else who has opposed them. Get a Ouija Board and ask Julius Stretcher or Alfred Rosenberg.
2 likes

Restlessdreams88
3 days ago
Basic joy division shirt
1 like

imSofaKingRayZest
3 days ago
just a few important points for the white australia parties policies off the top of my head, ending australias un treaties is a must at the start as it legally underpins most of the un-australian laws in place, lima declaration, who health policies, climate change mandates, etc. free speech is also a must, as a org commented to truth, lies can always be defeated by truth, the holocost could never be pushed if truth was honored. a comprehensive policy on technology and its use is also essential with the neural/social distortion capacity, coming dominance of ai and agi and the robotic transition. a massive re education program for both women and men toward a more natural order.
1 like

imSofaKingRayZest
3 days ago
afp have the power to legally hack into your devices and plant illegal material on it then raid you and charge you for having said material. think about that for 58 seconds while another non white immigrant legally becomes australian, cobber.
0 likes

imSofaKingRayZest
3 days ago
so abbos calling for “their” land back and an end of australia or importing infinity turd world filth is not seen as racially divisive or threatening social cohesion but white aussies wanting a white australia like it used to be is when we are all suppose to be equal?
0 likes

Keane55
VerifiedSupporter
3 days ago
Also important to remember that Winston Churchill was responsible for the Galipolli disaster, of which the ANZACs were a massive percentage of the casualties.
0 likes

palacepony
Supporter
3 days ago
Yeah this DISRUPT LAW shit.. where is the line drawn here? Rape your wife? Kill your dog? Burn your car? Blair is great to expose the frailty of these stooges and their ‘disrupt law’.
1 like

BradC1988
3 days ago
The WAR film is fucking epic and inspirational. AUSTRALIA FOR THE WHITE MAN! THE REST MUST GO!
1 like

Bolzenschleuder
3 days ago
Joel serving up some sweet emo aesthetics tonight
0 likes

Seanybruv
4 days ago
2:22:00 slurs only exist for inferior people and inferior things. It’s why there are no proper slurs for White people, at least none that actually work in the same way they do for other races.
0 likes

SALAustNZ
4 days ago
No. There are no groups in heaven.
1 like

Seanybruv
4 days ago
I can’t believe you didn’t talk about the White Australia Rising documentary. I see it’s been taken off youtube already, it’s criminally underviewed on Rumble
1 like

Scovell7
Supporter
4 days ago
Blair’s blackpilling seems to increase with each episode. It really contrasts with what appears to be the mood of the NSN at the moment.
6 likes

› Show 2 replies
3010phil
4 days ago
They should look at how many from the AFD party in Germany have recently died . Way too many for coincidence
4 likes

fdgrdfg
4 days ago
1:25:50 Blair’s response was goated ahaha
0 likes

DJTriumph
Supporter
4 days ago
If there was a White Britain Party I would vote for the first time in my life
4 likes

TripleGas
VerifiedSupporter
4 days ago
Erika Kirk (née Frantze) is a yenta.
3 likes

TripleGas
VerifiedSupporter
4 days ago
this whole “nigggers are going to heaven” shit is so fucking retarded and is always pushed by fedora fags and Satanists as some kind of own. They don’t even believe in heaven but try concern troll Christians. Pathetic bunch they are.
-2 likes

AltKuyperian
Supporter+
4 days ago
Sad I keep missing these. Show is over before I get out of bed in the morning lol
3 likes

Dissident_Loner
Supporter
4 days ago
I had hoped that Blair would go off on an uplifting rant and he didn’t disappoint.
2 likes

LachlanMD
4 days ago
these ads before the show are getting ridiculous
7 likes

‹ Hide 5 replies
Seanybruv
4 days ago
watch on Brave browser, no ads
6 likes

MajesticCasual
4 days ago
Brave browser, or Adblock Plug in on FireFox, etc I probably haven’t seen an ad since 2008 or so. Ads become obsolete and why on YoudenTube they have people manually read ads.
1 like

AltKuyperian
Supporter+
4 days ago
Unfortunately, it’s due to the large presence of easily fooled boomers on the app.
0 likes

BradC1988
3 days ago
Brave browser solved that problem for me
0 likes

Strueth
3 days ago
p l l
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Strueth
2 days ago
oops sorry,, I had my phone in my pocket gardening and just noticed this weird pocket message…
0 likes

katana17
5 days ago
[Joel Davis – NSN Conference Speech – Aug 10, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/11/03/joel-davis-nsn-conference-speech-aug-10-2025-transcript/ [In this speech given at a National Socialism Network conference in August 2025, Aussie nationalist activist Joel Davis talks on “Why Individualism is Cowardice”, and how to be effective Whites need to see politics as a team sport, just like our enemies, organized jewry and other groups, and work together. Key points: Organisational strength and media coverage: “This whole weekend has been such an upgrade for the organisation… They think making us look strong is going to go against us.” Critique of individualist accusations: “These Nazis they can’t get a girlfriend, they’re poor, they’re a bunch of losers… And so they have to blame the jews, blame the system, blame society for their ills.” Political sacrifice as responsibility: “To engage in this form of politics requires incredible sacrifice. We are the ones that are taking personal responsibility for the future of Our nation.” Politics as inherently collective: “There is no such thing as individualism in politics because politics, by definition is how you organise a society.” Criticism of conservative withdrawal: “What these people actually are advocating for is for you to exit political life, for you to not participate in political life, to become apolitical.” Learning from Left-wing tactics: “The Left make the personal political… The reason why your life sucks is because of White supremacy, is because of Patriarchy… And the way that we’re going to fix it is we’re going to go and create a political movement.” Movement costs and commitment: “This movement exacts costs… If you participate in our movement, you get a lot of enemies… They’re trying to put us in jail.” Racial politics as team sport: “Politics is a team sport… We have to play as a team, as White people, if we want to win!” And more, ….
1 like

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: Okay, we are live. It is the 5th of October, 2025. Week off for Blair this week. He’s had a lot on, but it’s all good because we got Jacob back on the show. Often requested, the acting leader of White Australia, Jacob Hersant. How are you doing this evening?

 

Jacob Hersant: I’m going well. Just suffering because of the change of daylight savings. We lost an hour. So I’m just sad, just sad the Germans Instituted that during the First World War. Apparently a lot of people have car accidents when it like changes over. And I don’t know, it’s like an interesting argument, like either way, whether or not having more light daylight or having more people die, like, what’s like, more worthy? What do you think, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: I personally don’t really give a fuck! I really don’t give a fuck!

 

Jacob Hersant: That’s not something you’re gonna die on a hill for.

 

Joel Davis: No.

 

Jacob Hersant: You’re not gonna put that on the party policies.

 

Joel Davis: No.

 

Jacob Hersant: Repeal daylight savings. That’s our main issue.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, this is like the main problem with like a lot of people with political opinions. I had this thought this week that everyone who’s. Who cares about politics and is like actively involved in politics, but their motivation isn’t racism, that it’s like something else, something wrong with them. Like, why would you actually care about politics otherwise? Like, it’s a whole bunch of debates over minutia, like whether we should have daylight savings or not, or like what tax brackets should have to pay, what percentage and so on. It’s just like instant snooze fest for me. Like, yeah, it’s all pretty gay and, …

 

Jacob Hersant: Like talking about bean collections and things like that. There was this. I can’t remember his name, but it was a British nationalist who was criticising a radical group in Britain and he’s saying real politics is talking about bin collection. And the issues that affect everyday Britons. And he just completely missed the point that politics is really about like the main issues like identity and national survival and all these kind of things. He also had like a really funny accent and everyone just used to meme him, but I think he’s just disappeared now. I haven’t seen any of his videos for almost a decade now.

 

Joel Davis: This is a problem that Gerard Rennick has. Gerard Rennick has a lot of good policies, like particularly his economic policies because he has pretty nationalist economic policies. And his policy on immigration, even though he is cucked on race, his policy on immigration is actually better than any of the other parties I Believe. It was like a hundred thousand maximum. And the policy of like One Nation is Net Zero. And Net Zero is still like a quarter of a million people in a year because that’s how many people leave on average, emigrate away from Australia to other countries. Most of them are White. Most of the people coming in are non-White. And so even if you have Net Zero immigration, it’s still a demographic issue.

 

But I think for Rennick it was like, cut it to a hundred thousand, like gross, which would be like net negative migration. Obviously he doesn’t support limiting the intake to just Western countries or something, which would make it a much better policy.

 

But anyway, my point is this. Gerard Rennick is extremely boring. He just wants to talk about all of these minutia policies that a bunch of like Boomers find interesting on Facebook or something, but nothing that will actually grab headlines, nothing that will really motivate strong emotions, strong feelings in the people.

 

And that’s why, even though he has a lot of good policies, I don’t think his party is going to have a great deal of success. And it’s incredibly uninspiring. I had someone report to me on what went down his recent. Because he’s setting up branches around the country for his new party and they had a meeting in Western Sydney last week. Someone sent me a photo of the meeting and it was like 90% Boomers, like White hair Boomers just sitting there.

 

And apparently Rennick said to the people:

 

“We’re going to hand out flyers and this and that, but don’t say anything controversial. Don’t say anything that’ll get you into the newspapers. Don’t say anything that will get you called the Nazi by the media.”

 

And that’s his mindset. It’s like, how far are you going to get with that mindset, Gerard? Where, like, no one’s talking about you and no one cares about you, and no one has very strong feelings about what you have to say. I don’t think it’s going to get very far. I think you’re going to. I think obviously the way that we approach politics, I mean, you can get a lot further when you have ideas outside of the mainstream through controversy.

 

Like if you look at the rise of Pauline Hanson or the rise of Donald Trump or these kind of populist politicians that have actually accumulated a decent amount of support, even though we have criticisms of them due to their flaws, the reason they got that base of support was by being attacked by the media constantly, by being controversial and it’s a common trope. Same with Nigel Farage in Britain or all these kind of populist Right-wing politicians that have any kind of success. Again, these people are all Zionist cucks, but at the same time they understand that controversy is currency in, particularly on the political Right in the contemporary era.

 

[05:24]

 

And I think the few the future of Rightwing politics is going to depend on who can channel controversy to their best benefit as opposed to those who run away from it. Similar with March for Australia. March for Australia didn’t shy away from controversy and that’s why it got so big and so hyped and had such a good attendance because it invited controversy, it got attacked by the media, it got attacked by the politicians and that just inspired people who hate the media and hate the politicians to come out and march where they otherwise might not have even heard of jacob Hersant: Definitely! So what did you want to talk about tonight? What’s on the agenda?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I thought the reason why I called the stream “Ain’t no party like the White Australia Party”, which is a LeBron James reference for those who know. But the reason why I called it that was because I thought it’s been a slow news week and we should talk probably about like the state of the movement, you know what the plan is over the next few months because obviously it was a big winter, we had a lot going on, particularly in August, now Tom’s in prison and so on.

 

And I think maybe the people would be interested in where we’re going with things. Obviously we’re working towards setting up this political party that’s like our main focus. And there’s not a rush because there isn’t, keep saying this, there’s no significant election until the end of next year, which is the Victorian state election. So there’s no rush. But at the same time we want to get this thing set up and launch.

 

So that’s obviously a lot of the focus that we have. So I thought we could talk about that, like what the plan is so that you know this. The people that are following along at home can know what the plan is and buy into it and get where we’re going.

 

Jacob Hersant: Well, right now we’re focusing on just building up the amount of supporters that we have, specifically political supporters, because we need 1, 500 across the country to establish a federal party. Unfortunately, some of the work on the political party has been delayed because there’s just been a lot of reorganisation we’ve had to do with these charges that have been brought against a bunch of our members in Victoria in relation to the Camp Sovereignty incident where anti-fascists were attacking Australian patriots that were leaving the March for Australia.

 

So there was a scuffle there. A bunch of our people have been charged with violent disorder, given non-Association bail conditions and two of our members are in prison now, obviously one being Thomas national leader and another member which I won’t name. Hopefully we can get them out soon. We have a, we are organising another bail hearing for Tom and we’ve organised a bail hearing for the other member.

 

So hopefully there will be some good news in regard to that coming soon. So there hasn’t been much of an update other than so much.

 

There’s been so many people signing up to become political supporters in the wake of not only our winter nationals August 8, but also the March for Australia, August 31.

 

So there’s been a lot of people signing up. We haven’t yet reached that 1500 threshold but we’re majority of the way there and it couldn’t hurt to have a few more over that number. Obviously we’ll probably just allow it to go up further so that we have, we’re comfortably above that number when we actually establish the party.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So obviously we’ve got these, what we’re doing, excuse me, we’re doing regular events that are going to be opened up to our supporters. So that should be a good incentive people to go to White Australia.org. Sign up as a political supporter and then you can get invited to our seminars. When we put on nationals you can get invited to our national events which happen twice a year and you can be vetted to attend these types of events. You don’t have to join the Organisation as like a uniformed activist member. You can just, basically come to events like that it’s good for women, for maybe for old people, whatever. People that have sensitive professions, they feel like the commitment to being an activist is a bit much for them at this point in their life. You can still be somewhat involved, you can still come down and meet everyone and you can attend those types of events.

 

We’re gonna keep putting them on a regular basis and there’ll be speeches and so on. So get involved because yeah, go and sign up now by Australia.org and our seminars that are happening in about two weeks time. You can potentially come along to those.

 

But yeah, anyway, the, yeah, I think we should talk about a bit about the party itself because the way that I see it at this point, the way that the kind of political system is shifting. You know, we’ve seen the polling from the election was back in like what, April to now. So like in half a year, One Nation has like doubled its vote according to the polls. It’s now polling at like 13%. It’s polling above the Greens. Now the third biggest party in the country, the Liberals, are down to like 27%. So One Nation is almost at half the Liberal vote. And that’s not including all the other Right-wing parties. Like Trumpet of Patriots, I think was polling at 2% and the other parties make up an extra smaller percentage.

 

[11:25]

 

So the non-Liberal Party Right-wing vote is now crossed over the point where it’s like over half of the Liberal Party vote. And each time they do a poll, it seems like that number keeps closing and closing. The issues that we care about seem to be getting a lot of traction in political discourse. All the polling shows that people are increasingly dissatisfied with mass immigration and things like that.

 

Obviously the March for Australia was a huge bellwether for where public sentiment is on that issue. But the issue that we have in Australia, I think with distinction to Western Europe and even America, is that it’s not really happening for young voters.

 

If you look at the polling by age demographic Zoomers, Millennials, they’re not really going to the Right in the way that they are in America. Look at the polling in America, Zoomers are actually like more Right-wing than Boomers. Like Zoomers are the most Right-wing generation, which is like crazy! If you said that 10 years ago, no one would believe you because it used to be the complete inverse trend. Similar trends as well in Europe, where the Right-wing populist party is very popular with young voters. Conservative parties, not so much. But Right-wing populist parties, you know, are.

 

And what we see in Australia, because One Nation is kind of, it’s kind of like a Boomer party. It’s Boomer coded, it’s run by Boomers. Its leaders are old. It’s been around for decades. It was kind of at its zenith in the late 90s when it first launched. It doesn’t feel particularly fresh or new or dynamic. It doesn’t really appeal to young voters and they don’t know how to campaign to young voters or whatever. It just seems to be Boomers that are pissed off about immigration jumping ship to One Nation from Liberals or something.

 

And so there’s a massive gap in the market for a kind of youth focused nationalism where no one is really meeting that market right now! And I don’t really see anyone else in Australian politics that could meet that market except us. We are literally young. We’re in those, that age demographic as people than pretty much all of us.

 

And obviously our messaging and our promotion, it’s very like focused upon like on younger people, younger generations, people under the age of say like 35. You know, the way that we kind of put out our content and the way that it spreads online and so on, it appeals more to that kind of spectrum. So we think we have a golden opportunity where there’s like this market opportunity in Australian politics where no one is really competently. There isn’t like some Zionist populist Right party like they have been in Britain, or a lot of Western European countries that really appeals to that demographic in the same way. But the trends are all going in that direction where that demographic, something is going to have to emerge ultimately to cater to them.

 

And so we’ve got a golden opportunity I think to launch our party and actually have a untapped potential to draw voters from. Not that we can win an election off the back of just like young White voters, they’re outnumbered.

 

But the way that Senate works or Upper House elections work in the States, if you can get that 8%, Ralph Babet got elected to the Senate with 4.6% of the primary vote in Victoria, for example. You only need to get that radical fraction to come to your side and you can get people in into Parliament. So you know, there’s a lot of benefits to launching the party just in terms of like propping up our legal status within the system.

 

But I think that we have a proper chance of actually getting someone elected. And if we get just like one person elected, it’s infinitely more significant than any other party getting one person elected. Because it would be like a Nazi getting elected to Parliament. Like it’d be like international news story. It would be a really big deal, like the first Nazi elected in any English speaking country like ever!

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, well, there are many, many benefits to the party. That’s why we’re doing it. First being the legal protections that hopefully we can be afforded by actually being a political party. A lot of the time when we go into court, Victoria police will lie through their teeth and say:

 

“This isn’t a political organisation at all! This isn’t a registered political party. It’s a criminal group. A criminal group focused on putting up stickers!”

 

Political stickers I guess. And that has been quite annoying. If we establish a political party, the police will no longer be able to lie like that. And hopefully it will put the, it will kind of put the police on notice that they can’t keep using the same tactics that they have been using against the National Socialist Network particularly anymore.

 

So that’s what we’re hoping for. Maybe it won’t actually be that circumstance. A lot of the time these supposed liberal Democrats don’t actually care about liberal democracy, don’t care about the system they profess to defend. So this is just speculation. We’ll have to see what actually happens.

 

Another benefit is I, like you said I think we can get people elected. And when it comes to the long term strategy of the party, I think that eventually if enough energy goes into it and enough, enough people actually vote for it, we can get a substantial amount of people elected. Not to obviously take power, take a majority government, but just to have a bargaining chip, more or less being able to.

 

Actually, these other parties will have to come to us if they want to pass legislation that requires the other party, the major party in this, in this, in most cases it will be Liberal and Labor. If they want to pass legislation, they may need some of our politicians to vote for something.

 

[17:46]

 

So when you gain that power, you can use it to great effect. Especially if you are, if you have the right strategy and you have the right mindset where obviously if we were involved in politics, we’re not just going to be like any other minor party. We’re going to be causing all kinds of chaos. So we’ll have to see.

 

Like I remain, what I would say is I remain kind of cautiously optimistic about it. Like, it’s not something that I’m wedded to, something that I’m like, we have to do this, otherwise you know, everything’s gonna go to hell! There’s all these other projects that we’re working on as well, whether it be the street activism or community building and just the meta-political struggle we’re doing as well. So people need to understand that the political party isn’t the main thing. It’s not the only thing that we’re doing. Because a lot of people, when they think of politics, they think of party politics and they think that’s the only thing that matters. That is the whole game. Like if it is political, then it’s necessarily party politics.

 

But we have a completely different understanding of politics. We see it as broader and see our movement and what we have to do to further that movement as being broader than only party politics.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s true. But at the same time, I think the advantage of the political party, one of the main advantages is that it provides a way for the Australian public to buy into the movement en masse. Where if you’re just doing street rallies in uniform, it’s a pretty big step for a lot of people to go from just thinking that the video was cool to joining us and becoming one of us. But if you have a political party, it’s well, they could give you a vote, they could consider you as someone that they would vote for and that moves them into a position where now they’re supporting a National Socialist party and then that then maybe a larger percentage of them will then want to take the next step and the next step and the next step of involvement from there. So it provides, it’s good to provide a certain soft on ramp to the movement where it becomes accessible where people can see you as a viable alternative. Otherwise they get this view of like, well those guys in black, they’re pretty cool! But those ideas are obviously too extreme for the political system. And so I’m just going to have to vote for One Nation or something. If we give them an actual option to rally behind and they can go fuck one nation. All these Boomer cuck Sydney parties, I want the real deal, full spectrum.

 

So also, this is also part of why I think Liberal death., …

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, it’s important to give every like as many means to support the movement as possible. Whether it be donating or becoming a member or giving a vote or all these kind of things. So once we get a political party up, it’s just another way that people can support us. And yeah, that is very important. That’s a good point to bring up.

 

And another thing is if we get people elected, well then we can have, we can be given salaries to be full-time political soldiers, more or less. And all these establishment parties are, they’re kind of bolstered by these salaries that are being given out by the taxpayer. But we are pursuing our political mission without any taxpayer money! If we were given access to that through having our politicians elected and having staffers work with those politicians, imagine how much more work that we could do. Like these people are just taking the money of the taxpayer and wasting it on race treason and, or in the case of these smaller Right-wing parties, they’re just wasting it on Boomer nonsense that’s never, never going to change anything. Never going to save our race. We, despite having no money, are doing much more than they are. Imagine if the system was giving us some money or the taxpayer, rather. It’s not really the system, but the taxpayer.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean we are starting to get some resources behind us and that will continue. That’s the other thing as well with the political party people are going to be more inclined to join as members. They’re gonna back it. And so we can then create better propaganda as a movement because we’ll have like a party machine churning it out in general, it’s just like a, the obvious organisational structure or political movement.

 

And then also it’s like the legitimacy advantage as well. If you have someone in Parliament, it’s just like natural people would start taking it more seriously, like, as like a viable. It’s a viable thing. And if we’re in the Parliament and we’re in the black jackets or something in Parliament, everyone else is in a suit and we’re calling out the politicians, it’s going to be quite the spectacle! We’ll turn the Parliament into the usher, basically and the kind of stunts that we could pull in there and so on.

 

You also have Parliamentary privilege if you can Fed post in Parliament, like no legal charges can be laid against you can say anything. We could try and organise diplomatic visas for like, controversial people. There’s lots of things we could do. So it opens up a lot of interesting doors that we could exploit to our advantage.

 

[23:23]

 

But also we can give a voice to White Australians in the halls of power, which currently there is none. There is no voice for our people. And that’s obviously the main purpose of it is like the whole idea supposedly of representative democracy is you have politicians that represent you. Well, if you’re a nationalist, there are no politicians that represent you know, so you’re kind of picking over crumbs and coping about how this cuked politician kind of said something that’s kind of okay. You want someone to go in there and hold these politicians to account, call them out and tell it like it is. That’s supposed, you know, speak truth to power. That’s supposed to be the whole point of the representative democratic system or whatever. So we want to actually give the Australian people real democracy.

 

And if they don’t let us register the party, then we can show the Australian people that they don’t have a real democracy. They need to be, they need to see that made explicit to them because we give the system an option, either let us participate or destroy your own legitimacy to block us from participating. And it’s a choice. And I personally think we will be able to participate because of how robust Australian constitutional law is in regards to political parties. They tried to ban the Communist party in the 1950s, it failed. They went to a referendum to try and change the Constitution to enable them to ban the Communist Party. That referendum failed at the height of the Cold War. Very conservative political process at that time still failed. So it’s pretty airtight. They can’t block us. There have been registered National Socialist political parties in Australian history, you know, back in the 70s and so on.

 

So this precedent, it is not legally possible for them to block us without like an egregious unconstitutional action. And if they try to go to a referendum to try and ban us, the Australian people, I believe will vote that they can’t ban us. And it will just be another huge win!

 

So we’re going to put the system in a position where it’s kind of going to have to tolerate us if it doesn’t want to nuke itself and its own legitimacy. So we do that a lot. But this, I think in this instance it’s a much bigger, higher stakes proposition to the system where just like persecuting us over a political demonstration or something, it is a cost on legitimacy. But it isn’t as intense banning a political party. It’s a way bigger cost on its legitimacy.

 

So I don’t think they will do that. I think they’ll allow us to register, allow us to participate and I think we’ll surprise a lot of people with how successful we are. It’s going to be a lot of fun designing these campaigns. They’re going to be dynamic, they’re going to be interesting working on the policies at the moment. We’re going to have policies that are really powerful, that are conversation starters.

 

And again, talking about the meta-politics of what we’re doing, it’s going to have an effect on the rest of the political system. If we start gaining traction and having success, the other Right-wing parties are going to start moving to the Right. It’s going to shift the entire structure of the system. And that’s also why I’ve been promoting Total Liberal death. Because if we can lower the amount of votes going to the Liberal Party and direct them into the constellation of other rhyming parties, it’ll be a situation where the Right cannot govern as one party and it will fought before still like work as a coalition, a kind of uneasy coalition. And in that chaos, we can get a seat at the table and try and use that seat at the table to try and push for the most radical policies possible.

 

Jacob Hersant: I agree. Yeah, I agree. I don’t have much to add other than that. Yeah, I think we’ve covered the topic pretty well.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Do you want to, do you want to get into. You put out a post today saying we will not be attending October 19, March for Australia. Do you want to discuss that?

 

We will not be attending. But I want to preface it by saying that we have a good relationship with the organisers. We wish the march well. We hope that’s success. But in terms of our priorities as an organisation, we don’t think it makes sense for us to go again this time. We want to save our grill for Australia Day.

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Got the reasons why in the post why we decided against it for this one.

 

Jacob Hersant: Yes. So I made a statement saying that we’re not going to be showing up and I explained the reasons why because otherwise there was going to be speculation. This is, I guess it’s a tactical disagreement between us and March for Australia. It’s not a disagreement in ideals or we don’t oppose the organisation or anything like that. We like March for Australia and we’re happy to work with them again.

 

It’s just that in this circumstance, as you said, it doesn’t make sense for our organisation to participate again. We have a lot of things on that we have to do. We, well, we got to organise. We’ve got a lot of events going on in October as well. And when we attend these events, we bear a lot of the brunt of the consequences of those events. And we’re happy to do that when it’s a circumstance where we agree with it. We rally all the time, we do activism all the time and we face the consequences all the time.

 

[28:56]

 

But when it comes to, we’re selective with our activism, we really want it to be something novel, a message that we want put out there or even just one that if there hasn’t been a rally in a while, then I could understand doing a rally similar like that, similar to what they’re doing. But the issue is we don’t really see there as being a compelling reason, compelling reason to mobilise and I guess, you know, face the consequences, which. Yeah, I think we wouldn’t face any consequences anywhere other than Melbourne, where there’s obviously these violent Antifa. Even then I think it may be a circumstance where these Antifa are already beaten because they didn’t show up to that other cuck rally that was in September, the one that was organised in opposition to March for Australia. None of the Antifa showed up to that even though and you may say okay, the reason they didn’t show up to that was because they understood these were the cucked Right and they weren’t the Black Shirts or the March for Australia ethno-nationalists. But I don’t think Leftists make that distinction. I think anyone to the right of them is a neo-Nazi whether they like it or not.

 

So I was very surprised that that march wasn’t met with any violence and I think the reason was because they got the absolute piss beaten out of them last time maybe the reason why they didn’t do anything. So it may be that circumstances again. So there could be a situation where we wouldn’t even bear any consequences for this. Maybe the Left are just too scared to use violence against the marchers and let’s hope that’s the case because we don’t want anyone getting attacked for their, for their political views on our side. So yeah but it makes sense for us not to, not to, not to go to this one.

 

But as I said in the post we will be working with them again in the future particularly for Australia Day.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So in Melbourne I think Matt Trihey is going to be running today from the National Workers alliance who’s a solid guy, solid ethno-nationalist. A friend of ours and he’s alleged that he’s a ex-professional MMA fighter. Solid, solid ideologically has been for a long time. Doesn’t cuck on anything, not even the jewish question. Refuses to have people on the stage given speeches that they don’t meet a standard of being a true nationalist. So you know I think all power to him, support to him. I think Blair has worked with him a lot in the past so I’m sure Blair is going to help him out on this one. So we wish the march every success in Melbourne. In particular because it’s going to be our friends still doing the bit on the day and it’s an opportunity for because there was a lot of controversy about us being there.

 

The reason why we intervened in all August 31st as Sewell explained beforehand was because we wanted to make sure that Zionists and other you know, influence groups didn’t come in and take over the march and make it about them. And so we intervened because us just saying that we’re going to go pushes out a lot of those types. And also we kind of elbowed them, helped elbow them out the way behind the scenes. And we supported the organisers because none of the organisers are members of our organisation, but we know them to be actual nationalists.

 

And so even though maybe they don’t do the Hitler thing, whatever their private views are on the subject, we know that they are genuine nationalists and they care about our people when they’re doing it for the right reasons. So that’s why we supported them. And there was a lot of disputes between different in the nature of an event like that, between different elements that will:

 

“Keep the Nazis away and so on!”

 

But the actual organisers maintained a solid stance and said we’re welcome:

 

“They’re nationalists. They deserve to be here. They’re against immigration too.”

 

And so it’s adorable they didn’t cuck. They kept the messaging solid. The event was a huge success. And so they deserve respect for doing that because there’s a lot of people that do tuck under that kind of pressure. I think we added a lot of value to the event, like by going because we enhanced the controversy around the event.

 

But at the same time people said, oh well if the Nazis go, it makes Antifa attack everyone and it makes ruins the event. So now they have an opportunity to do it without us. And we can see like what, how that goes. You know, maybe us not being there all the people that said us not being there is going to make the event better and so on. Well, now you get to have your event. And everyone that said that we’re feds, that we just came down to the event to try and hijack it in order to give the media a certain narrative or de-legitimize the event. Well, here you go. Not even going to go to this one. So we’re not feds.

 

But yeah, the reality would be like if we rocked up in Melbourne again and we tend to do things nationally as a group, like if we’re going to do it somewhere, we do it everywhere. You know, we try to operate as a national group. We’re going to mobilise again in Melbourne, it’s probably going to mean potentially a whole bunch more assault charges.

 

[34:37]

 

Whereas, you know, we, you know, we’ve got to save our grill. Like Australia Day is going to be huge. I know much for Australia want to go again on Australia Day. I think that’s going to be massive because we’ve had these Invasion Day communist Aboriginal garbage rallies taken over our cities year after year on Australia Day for a while now with no official Australia Day celebration. And it can’t go on. We have to take Australia Day. We have to take our cities back on Australia Day. Australia Day has to be a celebration of our national identity and it can’t just be openly like disrespected and counter-protested and like they’re trying to basically make Australian pride illegal, get rid of all official celebrations of it to de-legitimize the fact that it’s our country, obviously. So it’s an attack on us. It’s not just about the day, it’s about what it means.

 

So we’re all in on that. And I hope that this event is successful so that it can be a kind of amplifier to a big Australia Day rally.

 

So we ’re not saying the event is cucked and therefore we’re not supporting it or some shit like that! I hope no one gets it twisted. We’re not trying to counter signal the event. It’s just our organisational priorities are like when we go, when the average person goes to a rally like this, the chances of them getting arrested or something like is much lower than if we go obviously. So we have to calculate that in our decision making.

 

And then also for the average person, they don’t really do anything politically. Like going to a March for Australia is like the one thing they’ve done this year that’s political organising. Whereas for us we’re trying to put on seminars, we’re organising a series of other events within our organisation and we’re trying to build up to launching our political party. And we’ve got our own brand. We don’t want to just become the March for Australia Black Shirts. We want to keep doing NSN rallies.

 

So yeah, I think it makes sense for all those reasons why we’re not going, but we wish them well. And it’ll be interesting, I guess, to see how it goes. Again. Sydney, they’re trying to take, they’re gonna take Hyde Park this time, which is like usually full of pro-Palestine protesters every weekend. So it’d be nice for it to be full of Australian flags instead.

 

But yeah. Is there much anything else you want to add on that?

 

Jacob Hersant: No, we covered it.

 

Joel Davis: But yeah, I think for the broader. This is a question I wanted to ask you about or get your thoughts on. And I presume you would have a similar view, but maybe you’d have a slightly different view. So it could be interesting.

 

There’s some debate that because obviously you get like conservatives who will say like horseshoe theory type stuff, oh, National Socialism and communism is actually very similar and like they’re two strains of the same virus and they’re all the same. And which is obviously insane! Right. But they say this kind of thing then you’ll get people on our side who will say:

 

“Oh, National Socialism isn’t Left-wing or Right-wing. And so we shouldn’t identify as being part of the Right-wing, we shouldn’t identify as the far-Right, we should identify as a Third Position.”

 

And obviously there’s some logic to that position.

 

But at the same time I think that that’s the incorrect way of going about things for two reasons. One, when National Socialism and fascism was first invented, what kind of denominator the political spectrum was quite different. It was a lot more about like climate, class distinctions than it is today. Today the Right and the Left aren’t really about what class you side with or your views on the Monarchy or the aristocracy or these types of things. It’s a lot more frankly like whether you oppose or have some sympathy to nationalism directionally.

 

And I think that should be encouraged. I think we should encourage the redefinition because Left and Right, as is just a relative determination like through history, it’s meant different things. Originally it meant do you support completely getting rid of the Monarchy and the aristocracy or you’re a conservative that supports retaining a certain amount of aristocratic privilege, or a constitutional monarchy or something like that.

 

And then also do you support the Church having like a prominent role in the state or not or whatever. And the Left were like get rid of it all, equalise everything. Then obviously the Left became a lot more about socialism, a lot more rather than just that liberal opposition to old world monarchism. And then it became kind of socialism versus like bourgeois liberalism which became the Right. And it became like your position on capitalism, your position on wage distribution or income distribution and things like that, redistribution, etc.

 

But I think increasingly that’s not the case anymore. I think a lot of people identify with the political Right-wing, but actually have so-called Left-wing or socialist views on economic policies, but they just support the Right-wing because they’re anti-immigration or they’re anti-trans or you know, that type of thing. They support Right-wing social policies. And a lot of people on the Left. What really animates them is those issues as well. Like they, you’ll get Leftists who you know, left us agree with billionaires that immigration is good for example. They don’t seem to really care about the White working class, seem to only care about brown people and black people or whatever and like their interests. There’s a lot of people on the Left that just want all the CEOs to become brown and black and then they support capitalism as long as it’s no longer like you know, propping up the White race or something in their perception.

 

So I think race is increasingly the main dividing issue on Left and Right and we should encourage this. We should like think, amplify it and say yes, us as like the pure position on this issue on the far-Right and the most ultra left are the most anti-White and everyone else kind of plots within that distinction. And we should try overcode the Left-Right dichotomy with our framework, our racialised framework and position ourselves on the far-Right.

 

Would you agree with that as like a orientation or would you side with the Third Positionist position?

 

[41:20]

 

Jacob Hersant: I’m not wedded to either really. I see validity in both kind of ways of framing it. Obviously we have some similarities with socialism being on the Left and then in terms of our values in nationalism and traditionalism, that’s more associated with the Right-wing.

 

So when you use that framework to talk about those similarities we have with the movement saying that we’re nationalists but we’re also socialists, sometimes going from that Third Position lens is useful when you’re trying to convince someone or persuade someone to become a National Socialist.

 

But at the same time I also like, I like being called far-Right man. I think it sounds good. I like being the furthest to the Right being the most pure position and I like the fact that when you’re right about something, you’re correct about something. We are far-Right, we are far correct, we are the most correct position and everything else is a watering down of our position. And the further you go, you go to the far-Left and that is, it’s good to have that contrast because I don’t think anyone’s going to be convinced by horseshoe theory. Because when you look at Black Shirts, we look like, we do look like the far-Right. That’s what you look at the far-Right. That’s what you would expect to see someone with a good haircut. Clean shaven, wearing all black, just proper like old school kind of look.

 

And then you look at the far-Left, it’s the complete opposite of that, where they’re disheveled, transgender freaks, spiteful mutants and all of that kind of stuff. So people, they look at the difference between our two groups, like let’s say the Victorian Socialists on one hand and then the National Social Network, despite the fact that you have the word socialist in it, look at the two groups and then try to say that they’re the same thing. It’s insanity! And that’s why it’s confined to midwits like Drew Pavlou, who’s, who used this type of argumentation because it’s not convincing. It’s so different from how things actually are. So I like both, I like calling myself far-Right, but when it comes to saying:

 

“Hey, actually we have some agreements with, I guess what you would call the historical left.”

 

Because most of the, most of the Left-Right now aren’t very socialistic when it comes to like the Labor Party and things like that. So I like being able to talk about that, but I also like being able to identify as far-Right.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, that’s fair enough.

 

But obviously Left and Right is a relativistic determination.

 

So originally classical liberals the original liberals were actually on the Left during that time, like I’m talking about the French Revolution or something.

 

Whereas like the so-called conservatives of today, they identify as liberals they are ideological liberals. The average member of the Liberal Party that is apparently a conservative or Liberal Party voter doesn’t support absolute monarchy or aristocratic peerage or like any of these, like the, like the clergy having like representation in the Senate or something like there would never support, or maybe a few of them would, but pretty much none of them would support things like that or even to conceive of them, which is what the traditional Right supported against the Leftists who were like, no, it should be one vote once per citizen, shouldn’t matter what social class you come from, whatever. So these things change over time. So we could have agreements with the historical Left, but so do conservatives. Conservatives literally are the historical Left, like in every respect.

 

And then when it comes to what the current left gets offended by, if I go up to a Leftist and say:

 

“Hey, I might have some agreement with you on, I don’t know, environmentalism, or I might have some agreement with you on like defending, you know, state funded healthcare systems or whatever.”

 

Now I’m going to be like:

 

“Oh, well, you know, it’s, just you being a racist, it’s not that big of a deal. Like we agree on most things. Let’s like try and work together to those ends. Let’s try and get all these different environmentalist and socialist policies passed and we could just leave the race discussion for later.”

 

They’re never going to do that! It’s far more likely that people on the Right-wing who are already anti-immigration and are already nationalists, but maybe they biased, what’s more of a free market system. They’re more likely to say:

 

“Oh well we agree on all of this stuff, but we don’t necessarily agree on economic policy, but we could still kind of work together.”

 

That’s way more likely that that’s going to happen. So like, obviously, therefore we’re on the Right because what fundamentally animates each side morally is those more fundamental social, like racial issues. And no, we’re not like communists when it comes to economics either. National Socialists defended private property. They defended small businesses. If you read about what the election campaigns were like in Germany in the late 1920s, early 1930s, the other Right-wing parties of that time, a lot of them tried to criticise the National Socialists for having like Bolshevik economic policies or whatever. Like that was actually an argument that they used.

 

And in those days, like it wasn’t like the NSDAP was considered controversial because it was racist or anti-semitic. Like half the parties were racist. Almost all the parties are racist and anti-semitic in Germany in the late 1920s, and early 1930s. So it was a completely different era.

 

[47:13]

 

But in the kind of debates they would have, the National Socialists would defend themselves saying:

 

“No, we support defending private property, we support defending agriculture. We support defending, you know, small businesses. We don’t support this kind of Americanised capitalism where these mega corporations take over all of these industries and remove your experience of being a worker, or a consumer completely alienated from your local context and make you a cog in this international machine run by jewish finance. We don’t support that. We support localism, we support mom and pop stores.”

 

And these are the types of things that conservatives care about apparently, like the party of small business. That’s what Liberals present themselves as, even though they’re really the party of big business. So that doesn’t sound like the same thing as a communist. You know, communists talk about how:

 

“We’ve got to like execute landlords and small business, big business doesn’t matter, they’re all capitalist scum and they all need to hang!”

 

You know, that’s completely different. National Socialism is not just like racist communism. It is like clearly distinct.

 

Jacob Hersant: Well that’s why you have the term National Bolshevism. Yeah, that describes what these people are describing and it’s a more or less a meme ideology now. Nobody really believes in it or is actually fighting for it. So yeah, it’s not an issue.

 

But I remember Jonathan Bowden to move back to the previous point. Jonathan Bowden, he defined the Right and the Left based on whether or not you support inequality or equality. But I think, which I think describes more or less the what you’re talking about as well.

 

But I think it’s easier for people to understand when it’s framed around nationalism and then I guess race treason and national treason on the other end. That’s probably easier for people to understand.

 

But that is more or less the defining Right versus Left-wing nowadays because it’s such a crucial and visceral issue that is defining this whole age like whether or not nationalism is going to win or you know, national treason. We need like a better word for that. I guess just race treason. Race treason. National treason. I guess anti-Whiteism. What do we put on the other end? What’s the Left defined by?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think it’s just defined by like White genocide basically. You’re either you’re non-White and actively supporting the theft of Western nations from the White race or you’re a race traitor White person who actively supports it.

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, White survival on one end and then White genocide on the other? That really is what is animating all of these political groups. But we also got to understand that what we call Right-wing parties today are more or less Left-wing parties. Like the people that vote for them tend to be Right-wing.

 

But then they’re betrayed over and over again by the politicians who they want to represent them. They don’t represent them at all! They take their votes, they take their money and they’re happy and then they Institute a similar agenda as the rest of the Left. The rest of the race traitors and traitors to Australia.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, this is part of why I supported in my article I wrote before the election “Reconceptualizing Liberal Party as a Left-wing party”. Because on policy it is a Left-wing party. Like name one Right-wing policy that Liberals have. You can’t, because there isn’t one. The Liberals were the party that were responsible for taking away our guns. They were the party responsible for passing gay marriage. They were the party responsible for institutionalizing multiculturalism as government policy under Fraser in the late 70s, Liberal Party openly declared, like Scott Morrison, ex-leader, ex-prime minister, Liberal Party said:

 

“We are the party that ended the White Australia Policy!”

 

He’s right. They were. The Liberal Party time and time again has, basically facilitated the agenda of the Left.

 

So why is it conceived of as a Right-wing party? It just shouldn’t. We should just like move the centre of Australian politics from one side of the Liberal Party to the other side. I think that’s a really easy distinction to make and one that needs to happen. That’s why again, I support Total Liberal Death.

 

One thing that we should be able to agree upon with the Right, even if you think we’re a little extreme for you is we’re going to destroy the Liberal Party because it is this traitorous entity that just sucks all the energy out of the general Right-wing and subordinates it to the interests of the establishment which is fundamentally defined by basically Left-wing social policies straight up and down the ticket. Like the Liberal Party supports transgenderism.

 

I remember there was a time I was still living in Sydney, but I was coming down to visit the boys in Melbourne a lot a few years ago and I made a trip down to Melbourne for some other reason. I think it was because the Stop Immigration rally was happening and some other things and I was like:

 

“Well, if I’m going to be in Melbourne, there was like all these Drag Queen Story Hours that were happening. Might as well just try and like attack these Drag Queen Story Hours.”

 

And so I started creating campaigns to like mobilise people to attack certain Drag Queen Story Hours. And I think Sewell was like:

 

“Yeah, let’s like mobilise like the NSN, the counter-protest one of them.”

 

But we didn’t have to counter-protest any of them because we just kept getting them shut down. As soon as like we started like attacking it and getting people to like call up and you know, complain and saying we’re going to do a kind of protest rally at the front of the child care centre or library or wherever it was being held. That would just pull it! The police would advise them to pull it and, or that they would buckle under the pressure and they’d pull it.

 

[53:43]

 

And so we got so many of these Drag Queen Story Hours shut down across Melbourne that it frustrated the Premier. I think at the time Dan Andrews was still premier. I think it was before he stepped down. That he actually held the Drag Queen Story Hour inside Parliament with all the media just to like, because it was the one place where we couldn’t get it shut down by threatening to counter-protest it.

 

And then at the time, John Pudo [sp] was the leader of the Victorian Liberal Party and he came out into the media, he was so upset about this Drag Queen Story Hour being held in Parliament because he wasn’t invited! Because he wasn’t invited. He said:

 

“How dare they not invite me. No one supports transgenderism more than Liberal Party. We love transgenderism even more than the Labor Party. And this is an outrage! They would try and portray us as an anti-trans, anti-LGBT party. We love gay people, we love trans people and so on.”

 

So that’s the Liberal Party, right? Just like let that sink in for a second. This is your so-called Right-wing party. Like it’s a joke!

 

Jacob Hersant: Well, it’s been interesting seeing the shills come out and try to mobilise and what’s the word? Recuperate some Right-wing support for the Liberal Party with this Andrew Hastie character. So I saw a video of him where he was, I guess, lamenting the fact that Australia’s car industry has died, which the Liberals did nothing to save anyway. But he was lamenting that with like a antique car. And he had a flashy video for it.

 

And this is what is being kind of dangled before the Right-wing to try and recuperate some support for the Liberal Party. And I’ve seen that you’ve been coming out against it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we’ve been talking about how Andrew Hastie is a faggot for the last two weeks in a row, on The Joel and Blair Show. So all viewers probably heard the talking points.

 

But yeah, I saw Andrew Hastie announced that he was stepping down from the front bench stepping or the shadow front bench because of the Liberal Party’s pro-immigration policies.

 

So I guess it’s kind of interesting that he’s tipped to probably make a leadership challenge next year. From what I heard from my sources inside the Liberal Party, he actually has the numbers. And considering the way things are going, the Liberals keep bleeding votes in the polls to One Nation and everything is kind of shifting to the Right in general discourse and public dissatisfaction. And we’re going to keep probably we’re going to keep definitely pouring kerosene on the fire of anti-immigration sentiment.

 

And so that trend will probably continue. I could see him being successful next year and Liberal Party trying to rebrand as you know, a more of an anti-immigration party in order to win votes in 2028 because otherwise, … It’s not so much that they’re losing votes to the Labor Party at this point or to the Teals, they’re losing votes to One Nation and other Right-wing parties and that’s existential for Liberal Party. If they lose the base they could become a micro party. They could never be a major party again, which is absolutely fantastic! So I support Sussan Ley. Hail Sussan Ley! She’s doing an incredible job, Agent Susan, destroying the Liberal Party. But unfortunately she’s doing too good of a job maybe. And so we accelerated too hard or something there and it could unravel.

 

But it’s very important that Andrew Hastie and this if he does get the leadership. He’s not believed! Because at the end of the day the Liberal Party is funded by corporate and industrial lobbyists that benefit from mass immigration. And they all, you know what he said was we’re going to, we should cut immigration to 2019 pre-covered levels which is still hundreds of thousands a year, net half a million a year gross. Over half a million people immigrated to Australia in 2019, I think it was like 200,000 roughly net over half a million gross.

 

And as I said earlier like quarter of a million plus Australians emigrate away from Australia every year, move to other countries. Most of them are White and most people coming in are not White. So 500,000 mostly not Whites coming in, 300,000 mostly Whites leaving. You do that for you know, the next 20 years, White people become a minority in this country. That’s what Andrew Hastie is offering you. So how is that worth supporting or rallying behind?

 

Also what it shows is that the only way it does occur, Andrew Hayesi does take power in the Liberal Party and they do pivot on their messaging. But what it shows is taking support away from the Liberal Party is the only way to make the Liberal Party become more Right-wing. If you give it all of its support, it just tries to win Left-wing votes at the centre, take away the support. Then it tries to actually listen to its own voters because that now it needs to. But at that point you’ve already got other parties that are better than the Liberal Party and other options that are better than the Liberal Party that are getting your support. So why would you take it back to the Liberal Party, just keep it over there? You know, so it’s like a, the incentive structure if you’re a Right-wing to support Liberal Party, isn’t there? The less you support it, the better it will get. The more you support it, the worse it will get.

 

So why support it?

 

[59:22]

 

Jacob Hersant: That is a good point. Yeah, I think this Andrew Hastie, it’s always not genuine when it comes to the, all this posturing and then they’re just going to continue immigration and it’s bizarre! It’s bizarre because you think they would pull the brake on it a little bit. Like what are the housing prices like in Sydney now? Somebody like showed it to me a few days ago and I couldn’t believe my eyes how expensive it is. And now they’re bringing in what’s the new legislation that brought in where it’s, I think you only have to have 5% now to get a, of the down payment to get a mortgage for a house. It’s just insanity! Like they’re just pumping up the usury even more. They’re pumping up the problems not only in terms of immigration and demand but then also economically. Like I don’t even understand what is happening. Maybe you’re going to have to explain it to me, Joel.

 

Joel Davis: Well, yeah, like the average house price in Sydney I think is over $2 million now, which is the average, I think the average income is about $100,000 a year.

 

So that’s 20 years average salary to buy a home. Obviously you can’t spend all your salary on just on mortgage repayments and then you’ve got interest on top of that. So basically if you’re taking out a 5% deposit loan as an like permanent debt slavery basically like just mathematically as like an adult.

 

Jacob Hersant: Could you even pay it off though? Even if you’re doing it somewhat, …

 

Joel Davis: I don’t think the bank would give it to you. I don’t think the bank would actually approve you for a loan at that, at those, on those. If you’re only earning $100,000 a year and you tried to buy a 2 million dollar house and you only had whatever 5% of that is like 100 grand deposit, I don’t think you could approve that. But like if they try to like force them to approve it through legislation. Like obviously that’s insanity!

 

And then also this whole system is just dependent upon. Then once you buy into the housing bubble and you get mortgaged up to the shit house in order to buy into it, well then now you’re basically kind of like leverage on it, continuing to expand because adding equity to your home is the only way that that becomes like financially viable. Like so then you’re not going to want to then support like cutting house prices in half by mass deporting 8 million non-Whites. Because that fucks you over. Which is why one of our keynote policies is going to be nationalizing the mortgage lending market and engaging in mass debt forgiveness. You’re going to have to write off a bunch of this debt in order to make it work, otherwise because we have to bring house prices down in order for housing to be affordable.

 

But we also have to like provide a way out for the people that got a mortgage to buy it. Like you know, they saved up, they worked hard, they got a massive mortgage for a massively overpriced property. We need to provide them with a relief as well. Like in order to like free them from debt slavery so that we can rebuild the middle class. Like it’s the only way to do it.

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah.

 

Is there anything else you want to talk about or should we go on to the Superchats?

 

Joel Davis: There isn’t that many Superchats because everyone’s being a cheap cunt tonight.

 

So we should probably, I don’t know pick one more subject.

 

Jacob Hersant: Talking about housing prices and it made them think about they’re being more sober with their spending.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! Yeah. What else is there to discuss? I guess another subject we could discuss. I guess is the subject of women in the movement. Seen a lot of like a lot more women in the movement lately. A lot more women online supporting policy. There was the poll that came out recently that showed Australian women actually have more negative attitudes towards immigration than Australian men. Of course, according to one poll. Obviously it’s one poll, but I thought that was interesting.

 

Obviously there’s the statistic that I think in the 1932 election the NSDAP actually got more votes from women than it got from men. So you know, we’ve said a lot of misogynistic things on the show over the years and I don’t take any of it back. But at the same time that’s interesting to note and obviously we’re not going to have women in the NSN anytime soon or ever! But that’s partly because of we just don’t. We don’t think it’s safe for women to be engaged in that kind of activity. But we’re putting on these seminars or whatever. There is a way for women to be involved and to support the party, that aspect of the movement, be a political supporter, attend those kinds of events. So we are giving women something they can do, some way to get involved other than just like, breeding.

 

So we’re throwing you a bone, throwing you a bone! But do you have thoughts on that? Did you see that poll? Would you have thoughts on that poll? Do you think it’s accurate?

 

[1:04:55]

 

 

Jacob Hersant: I’m not sure if it’s accurate. I can’t really. I don’t have any information that I’m privy to that can confirm whether it’s real or false. But it is interesting. That’s the same parallel that I made or the same connection I made was to the fact that the NSDAP got more votes from women than it did men. And it’s an interesting fact. I don’t think I have any definitive position on whether or not it’s a good thing to have more men voting for your party or more women voting for your party. It’s something that I’d have to sit down and really think about for quite a while. I’m kind of embarrassed that I haven’t thought about it a little bit more. But I guess this is an impetus to actually do that.

 

But as as Joel was saying you can become involved in our movement and White Australia that is not in the National Socialist Network because the National Socialist Network is focused on street activism. And just go watch the August 31st footage if you want to see why women aren’t involved in the National Socialist Network because there was some brutality happening on that day. So I’m sure women will be happy, to be spared that. And if you aren’t, okay, that’s pretty cool! But anyway we’re not gonna. We’re not gonna subject you to that nonetheless.

 

So you can get involved. Yeah, we’re doing things like seminar and where all the partners of members of the National Socialist Network and broader White Australia. All of the partners, the women meet up. A lot of them have children, so they’ll meet up and have play dates and those kind of things.

 

So there’s a lot that women can do if they are inclined to get involved and if you have a partner as well that isn’t involved. You should encourage them to get involved with one of the things that we’re doing at the very least.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. If you’re a woman, learn how to sew. Or maybe you already know how to sew, even better. So are some Australian flags, some nice because like the ones you buy in the shop that aren’t actually made, they’re just like Chinese, like plastic garbage! You can like make us a nice cotton Australian flag or several make us some Union Jacks. You can make us whatever. Or even better message one of us, then we’ll give you like, we’ll give you like stuff to make. There’s a lot, there’s lots of jobs for the grandmas that are good at sewing out there for a second example that they could do behind the scenes. Some of the women do help out. Some of the partners have helped out with that kind of thing in the past.

 

So there’s like women can be involved in the community aspect and they can do jobs like that, but just don’t want them on the front lines. I think that’s pretty reasonable.

 

But as for this poll, so this poll, the question was:

 

“Do you think immigration to Australia is generally positive or generally negative for the country?”

 

And men in this poll had about a thousand respondents, which is kind of normal, statistically normal for these kinds of things. Men were 46% positive, 39% negative, 14% unsure. Women were only 37% positive. They were 43% negative and, 20% unsure.

 

So that was interesting. And I was thinking about why would that be the case? Let’s just say that it’s at accurate. So we were disputing the accuracy, but I think it’s still like worth considering. Well, if it is accurate, why and polling the science people like say really low IQ about how polling is junk and how can you infer things about general populations if you only have a thousand or two thousand people in a study? But no, polling is actually extremely accurate. It’s been shown to be extremely accurate many times before in where polling can pretty accurately predict, you know, election outcomes with only a very small degree of like, not like perfect, like 100% accuracy, but only with, very small amount of discrepancy. So polling is science with empirical veracity.

 

But anyway, the point is that why would this be the case? I thought about a few things. One, I think what I observed, I don’t have polling on this, but what I observed just from like being out in public in Australia and somebody who travels around to different cities in Australia quite often and has a lot of varied experiences. Is that in Australia, mixed race couples, I’d say 8 out of 10 of them is a White man with a non-White woman at least and very small. A much smaller percentage of it is a White woman with a non-White man. Also when you go to like bougie White flight areas in like Sydney and Melbourne, I see a lot more women there than men. And all those women seem single.

 

So it seems like White women are more inclined to White flighting than White men and they’re less inclined, at least in Australia to dating non-Whites than the other way around. There’s a lot of White guys with Asian GFs and you’re seeing them with Indian GFs these days, which is like, I mean, what the fuck are you doing? But we’re seeing this as an epidemic. And you could say this is partly women’s fault for being, having being too hypergamous and having too high expectations. And so White men are like forced onto the yellow or brown GF plantation because they’re easier to pick up than a White woman. But at the same time, whatever the case may be, that’s a dynamic that I’ve observed.

 

And so if White guys are all banging gooks, they’re more inclined to say immigration is good. I’ve noticed a kind of dynamic where figures on the Australian Right like Drew Pavlou or John Ruddick, when they got rid of their Asian missus, they started pivoting to a far more anti-immigration stance almost immediately afterwards.

 

[1:10:52]

 

And I think there’s a correlation there. I think that there’s something to that. We’ve seen this many times with in like in general in the movement where you know, someone gets a non-White girlfriend and change their political opinions and vice versa because it makes sense.

 

Because if you’re going to breed with a non-White person, obviously everything changes in terms of what’s in your interest. When you become a full on like race traitor where you invest your genes in another race, then why would you care about White nationalism anymore? Now you’re invested in multi-racial society. So I thought maybe that could be one of the reasons why. Do you think that could be accurate?

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, I think women tend to race mix far less than men. And yeah, you’re right about that. Insofar as the most common race mixing couple that you’ll ever see is White man, Asian woman, at least in Australia, like you’ll see that quite frequently.

 

And I think it is for the reasons that you stated. And I want to hear your gradations of like, because you were saying I get it, why the Asian misses these pathetic White men are getting with the Asian women. But then you were far more disappointed about the fact that they’re getting with Indian women as well. [chuckling] So now we’re gonna have to hear like your [chuckling] hierarchy of like race fixing. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Well, I think it’s just objective. I mean, Asian women look like bugs. But like, obviously Indian women are next level disgusting! Like, Indians are the most putrid, unattractive race. They smell bad. They’re hairy as fuck! Asians don’t smell good either. But you have to be really close to them to realise that they smell bad. Whereas Indians, it’s a much more offensive odor. And you know.

 

Jacob Hersant: But where do blacks fit into there though?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I think having sex with the black woman is at least as gay as having sex with an Asian man! I would say that’s a kind of a different dimension. When I see a White man with a black woman, I think that maybe they’re like homosexual or they’re on the spectrum of homosexuality to a certain extent.

 

This is why I think as well, black men, like all niggers are gay. Like when blacks go to jail, they start butt raping each other. And like if you look at the data from America the gayest race per capita is blacks, according to the data.

 

So I think this is because black men obviously are attracted to black women, like, unlike anyone else seemingly, except for like a small group of freaks! And because they’re like biologically attuned to being attracted to black women, they kind of have to be almost bisexual because black women are so masculine. So their kind of sensitivity to the sexual sensitivity or whatever to homosexuality has to be reduced. So, yeah.

 

Jacob Hersant: Where do Red Indians fit? Are Red Indians equivalent of Asians?

 

Joel Davis: Well, it’s I don’t really know too many, like pure red Indians, like, usually like people that are native to the Americas are like mixed with White at this point to varying degrees. So.

 

Jacob Hersant: So like is Hispanic and like Arabic, because Arabic, a lot of Levantine people also have White DNA. Do you think like, the Hispanic and the Levantine are like a tier above the Asians?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean the Whiter ones. The Whiter ones, I would say so.

 

But then some of them are like, they have more of the putrid non-White DNA mixed into the point that it makes it like, really gross!

 

Obviously there’s Asian tiers as well. I think the Japanese are more attractive than, like, jungle Asians from, like, Vietnam or whatever, objectively.

 

So I think there’s tiers. Like, all race mixing is wrong, but, like, when you think about it, like, from the perspective of the inner world of the person who is sexually giving themselves over to that experience, like, it has to be a scale of degradation. Like I think that.

 

Jacob Hersant: Such a funny topic.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think. So yeah, I think it’s a funny topic. Send in some Superchats on that subject if you want some elaboration.

 

Jacob Hersant: Some people are going to be like, [chuckling] is it all right that I’m doing this? [chuckling] Oh, no! Like, don’t send in that Superchat. We’re just gonna tell you. No. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course it’s not all right if you have to ask if it’s all right and it’s not. But yeah I don’t know. Like, to me, it’s not like:

 

“Oh, man, I’m stuck having sex with White women. I really deeply I want to have a Japanese waifu, but because I’m loyal to Adolf Hitler, I’m stuck on the White implantation!”

 

I think White women are objectively, like, far more attractive, I think, in every way. Like, personally, like, obviously at their peak. If you said:

 

“This is the hottest Japanese girl in all of Japan and here’s like, the ugliest, fattest, most disgusting White girl.”

 

Obviously, like, … But luckily, I don’t have to make that choice. I can just be with a hot White chick. And that’s what you should all aspire to.

 

Jacob Hersant: Well, it seems to be when people say they have a preference for another race, the only one that you really hear about is yellow fever, like, having a preference for Asian women rather than White women. And you’ll hear this from, like, race traitors saying:

 

“I get what you’re saying about nationalism and all that, but I got yellow fever, mate!”

 

You [chuckling] never hear anyone saying they’re an oil driller or they’re obsessed with Levantine women or anything like that it’s only yellow.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. In Australia, I think a lot of Americans are into the Latinas.

 

Jacob Hersant: Oh, yeah, yeah. Actually, yeah.

 

[1:17:26]

 

Joel Davis: But we just don’t have too many of them in Australia, so it’s kind of like, not as much of a thing.

 

Jacob Hersant: They’re a similar race, though. Like the Red Indians. They’re almost like hapas [half and half], the Latinos are like hapas between Asians and Whites.

 

Joel Davis: It’s a scale that like some Latinos are like they’re like 3/4 plus White and then some of them are like brown as fuck k. And so there’s a spectrum. Like obviously like Nick Fuentes and like the average Mexican don’t look the same. Right? So there’s a massive spectrum in like how much mixed breeding with Whites occurred.

 

Obviously the Whiter it is, the more I can see why you’d be attracted to it because it comes closer to like White features that I find attractive. But that itself is a refutation in my opinion. But yeah, I think most of the time it’s a discount. Like they will say, people that have like Asian wives that try to justify it to me, they say:

 

“Oh, your White wife or girlfriend doesn’t respect you like my Asian wife, she’s cooking me fried rice and cleaning and she doesn’t like talk back and all this kind of shit!”

 

And it’s like obviously you don’t know how you can’t handle a White woman. You don’t know how to like make a White woman submit. So now like you just, you need a discount basically.

 

So it’s just like in a certain sense the trash taking itself out. I get less offended when I see a nerdy dysgenic White guy with an Asian misus because, I don’t support it. It’s still a problem. But I think:

 

“Well those genes, didn’t fail [pass] the test. So now I guess we don’t really need him on the race.”

 

Like if you’re a disgusting low IQ freak, do we need you reproducing with a White woman? Do we need you on the race anymore? Less. So but if it’s like a high stock looking, you know, solid White dude, it’s like, surely you could get a White girlfriend. Like what are you doing?

 

Jacob Hersant: I get crazy because they’re reducing a relationship to just having a domestic slave, more or less. It’s not about building a future, having children with this person, like the healthiest children you can have. The children that are going to be the most successful in the world. It’s just about having a domestic slave, which is crazy to me! But it just shows you the priorities that these race traitors have.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean just like watch your Sterling Cooper videos, Get skills and get a White domestic slave if that’s your thing.

 

Jacob Hersant: But I like how we started talking about, by talking about the party and big ambitions and now it’s, we’re talking about the gradations of race mixing! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: It’s a quality, it’s quality content. Like I’ve not like, I think the viewers enjoy it. It’s like fun but also it is actually serious.

 

So in your day to day life. Like you encountered this often and you have to have these conversations. Like I have conversations often with people who will say I’ve got the yellow fever or their race mixes. And I try to say something because I think:

 

“Well, it’s better I say something now while they’re just dating or they’re just fooling around with non-White women than no one’s saying anything and then all of a sudden they get married and have three hapa kids and now like it’s over. And now that that guy and his blood is lost from our nation forever!”

 

Like so it’s always good to say something. It’s always good to encourage others to say something because it’s dignity. It’s like as if you’re going to want your own flesh and blood not to be of your own people. Then what’s the point? Like what’s the point of putting in effort as a father? What’s the point of like are you gonna go to your grave like that? Like your bloodline is doomed? Like what are you, what are you doing?

 

Like, it’s such a baseline issue and it’s gonna, the amount of race mixing that is occurring, it’s going to become increasingly a bigger and bigger issue. We’re going to have all these resentful hapas, you know, ascending through institutions into positions of power and prominence over the next generation. A lot of them are going to be motivated by an anti-White animus. A lot of them are going to be motivated by their resentful mutant status. And it’s going to be a massive problem. So you know, it needs to be discussed, needs to be called out. Miscegenation was illegal too. Mixed race marriages were illegal in Australia in the past. They should be illegal.

 

If you want to marry an Asian, move to whatever her country of origin is and go and join her tribe over there. You know, that’s really what you want. But yeah. Should we get into the Superchats? What do you think?

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, let’s do it!

 

[1:22:40]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. All right. Fellow Comrade said:

 

“Lucky I work in real Estate!”

 

I guess, talking about how house prices are up, blah, blah, blah. Macula Torren said:

 

“Would you have Lucas Gage on the show again? He was stabbed in the back by the Brown Alliance. He’s writing his book Our Struggle, where he introduces neo-feudalism to solve America’s race issue.”

 

I’ve spoken to Lucas multiple times. We’ve done Twitter Spaces, we’ve done a few streams after January 26 for Australia Day. We had a big rally action. A lot happened. And he interviewed me afterwards. And again, Lucas is my friend. Sometimes we don’t see fully eye to eye on a lot of issues. But I do think that he does want to what is best for our race, for our people.

 

And even though I don’t agree with him on all takes because I think he tries too hard to win over the base non-Whites and develop some kind of one struggle philosophy, I do think that he’s earnest. I do think he’s just trying to do what he thinks will work to advance our people. I don’t think his motivations are like wrong.

 

So why wouldn’t I be friendly with someone like that? It’s okay to not agree 100% on all issues with people in our movement if their heart’s in the right place. They’re trying to advance movement, they’re trying to advance our people and they conduct themselves in a friendly manner. Like, why wouldn’t you still be friendly?

 

So if you wanted to do a stream, whether it would be discussing ideas we agree or disagree upon, I would always be down to do it.

 

But yeah, in terms of like, are you. This is gonna be something for you to sign up on Jacob, this whole allying with non-Whites thing. It was discussed after the March for Australia because there was some, mostly Americans. There’s like a wing of the American far-Right, the American nationals nationalist movement, where they’re so fixated upon anti-semitism, they’re so fixated upon anti-zionism that it’s almost like they put being pro-Palestine above being pro-White. Obviously we’re anti-Israel, obviously we’re anti-semitic, we’re anti-jew! But like, if I could deport every single jew to Israel tomorrow, I would do it without even thinking, of course I would do that. It feels like for some of these people, they wouldn’t even do that because it would be, it would facilitate the genocide of the Palestinians or something.

 

And it’s like, what? Like I’m not in politics because I give a shit about Palestinians. In politics because I give a shit about our race. You know, I don’t have anything particularly against the Palestinians either. I’m neutral on Palestine, but I’m anti-Israel because of what Israel is doing to our people.

 

And it’s like they can’t compute this. They think because Tom mentioned the anti-Israel, the pro-Palestine, anti-March for Australia protesters in his speech because we got into fights against people with Palestinian flags, that it means we’re allying with Israel. And like this, you’re either with Palestine or you’re with Israel and there’s no other position you could have. And I find this to be a ridiculous position. Do you want to weigh in on that?

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah. Well, if they’re so worried about us calling out Palestine, then these Palestinians need to police themselves and not attack our activists when we’re trying to do a March for Australia. If you’re going to position yourself against the Australian nationalist march, then obviously we’re going to oppose you in that’s a core principle. That’s what we’re fighting for.

 

So if they come out against us, we’re going to meet them. That’s the reality. Like, we’re going to oppose them in their opposing of us.

 

So it’s a bit ridiculous! What’s the alternative? Are we supposed to, anytime someone’s carrying a Palestine flag, are we allowed to just be beaten by them? And we can’t fight back because that would be playing into the hands of the jews? Obviously, if anyone’s playing into the hands of the jews, it’s these activists.

 

And I’m not saying all Palestinians are doing it. Obviously not all Palestinians are doing it, but these people that are having the Palestine flag and then coming out against Australian nationalism are the ones that are playing into the hands of the jews, not us, because they’re the ones that are instigating this conflict. Because otherwise, if it was not opposed to us and it was just against Israel and for Palestine, then we would support it because we don’t like Israel and we see Israel as being a bigger threat to Australian nationalism than Palestinian nationalism and Palestinian sovereignty. We have no problem with Palestine at all! In fact, we wish them well because they are fighting against a common enemy.

 

And in terms of, well, all we can do really is express solidarity with the Palestinians in their country. There’s not really that much more that we can do. We don’t have massive resources that we can just donate to Palestine. All of the money is going to the struggle for our nation. Just as the Palestinians are going to spend all their money on the liberation of their country. We’re focused on the liberation of our race and our country rather than foreigners. We’re focused on our race. Like we’re nationalists.

 

But a lot of these people that call themselves nationalists that are focused on Palestine particularly have become de-centered. They’ve lost what defines them largely which is nationalism. So they’re focused on foreigners instead of their own position and what is actually their own interest and what they should be fighting for.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And I think when it comes to the pro-Palestine movement, a lot of people in the movement are not Palestinian. They’re just like assorted Muslims of various types. There’s like Islamic solidarity. And these Muslim peoples are not our friends. They are one of the most hostile groups of immigrants to Australians. They weren’t just responsible for rape gangs in Britain was a way large scale, but that kind of shit happened here as well. That was one of the main fuels for the Cronulla riots* and so on and so this idea that we can ally with Muslims is ridiculous! Either Muslims live in their own countries on the other side of the world where they’re of no use to us, or they live in our countries in which case they’re hostile invaders and we want them to get the fuck out of our country.

 

[* The 2005 “Cronulla Riots” were a series of race riots in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. It began in the beachside suburb of Cronulla on 11 December, and spread over to additional suburbs the next few nights. The riots were triggered by an event the previous Sunday, when an altercation turned physical between a group of youths of Middle Eastern appearance (Lebanese) and White Australian lifeguards on the beach. Wikipedia]

 

[1:29:51]

 

So it’s like there’s no Muslim alliance that’s viable. They either have nothing to offer us or they’re just diametrically opposed to our interests.

 

And then the other major faction of the pro-Palestinian movement is communists who also hate us for all the obvious reasons. And so we’re not going to go and support the pro-Palestine movement. We stay away from it. We avoid it. I think Melbourne has had more pro-Palestine rallies in it than any other city in the world or something since October 7th, it has like the world record for pro-Palestine rallies. We have not interrupted a single one. It was only them that interrupted us. So we obviously stay away from them and let them do their thing because we’re not going to be foot soldiers for the jews. But yeah, this is, I think it’s a particularly like American online movement affliction.

 

And then a lot of people who amplify it are actually brown. They go into nationalist communities online but they have an anonymous avatar. No one can see their face. And then they pretend like they’re on our side just because they. But they’re just advancing their own interests. They then go and tell White nationalists they should stop being so hateful towards, towards other races and they should be focused on supporting Palestine and things like that it’s subversive! All of these people are falling for literal subversion.

 

There’s also an issue where a lot of the pro-Palestine rhetoric is anti-settler colonial. Like I’ve heard these people, the same arguments they use against Israel could be used against America or Australia like and us. So we oppose Israel not because it is conducting a genocide or whatever. We oppose Israel as White nationalists because Israel is the enemy of the White race! Because jews are the enemy of the White race and they are a parasitic influence on our countries. And if these people, this is the final kicker. I think. If you said there’s nothing that we can do for them. Well, there is one thing that we can do for them. We can take control of the Right-wing of Zionists, put in actual nationalists who are anti-jew in charge of the Right us instead of Zionists which currently control the institutional Right-wing.

 

How are we going to do that? Are we going to do that by waving Palestine flags? No, because if you look at the polling in Australia for example, Islam is by far the most hated religion in Australia. The Islamic migrant community is pretty much one of, if not the most hated groups in the country by the general population, particularly by Right-wing Australians. Patriotic Australians hate Muslims, period. There was polling done on this some time ago showed that the majority of Australians want a total ban on Islamic immigration. And then particularly with Right-wing voters, like a super majority of Right-wing voters supported that policy.

 

So we have to be strong on that issue. Otherwise if you have Zionists come forward on the Right like Zionist conservatives, like the Tommy Robinsons of this world and they are tough on Islam or they create the perception that they are and they’re the patriots against Islam and we are like soft on Islam. We’re waving Palestinian flags and talking about allying with Muslims. It’s just going to confuse a whole lot of patriotic Australians that we should be rallying behind us and our movement which is trying to take over the Right-wing from the Zionists.

 

So like if you’re pro-Palestine you should understand that even like from a tactical perspective it actually doesn’t make sense for us to directly support you because it would actually ruin our ability to take the Right-wing off the Zionists. And you guys already have control of the Left-wing. The Left-wing is already largely supporting you. So that’s the final move.

 

And then once that happens, then Israel is cut off from Western support because Left and Right together will oppose Israel for different reasons and then Israel’s fucked!

 

So that’s actually in your tactical interest, but also it’s in our tactical interest to deport jews to Israel and it’s in our interest to deport Muslims back to the Middle East. We want all of you gone! From your tactical point of view, you should stay out of our way and we’ll stay out of your way. But also we have fundamentally different interests. So the alliance is not viable.

 

Jacob Hersant: Well, in that regard it is a zero sum game where we want to deport all the jews to Israel and the Palestinians want to deport all the jews to our countries! And we don’t want the jews. So you guys, the Middle East is going to have to take the jews or we’re going to have to, … Maybe we can come up with a compromise where we send them all to Madagascar? I’ve heard of that plan. And maybe we’ll have to move some of the black, … I think actually the Madagascans are like a different ethnic group from regular Africans, like on the continent.

 

So maybe we can’t send them there, I don’t know.

 

Joel Davis: Madagascar as a metaphor for another place.

 

Jacob Hersant: You think it’s a metaphor for a different place? Yeah, I’m not going to talk about that because I’m a sensible wholesome chungus nationalist. I couldn’t even, I can’t believe you would suggest such a thing.

 

Joel Davis: No, no, no, of course not!

 

Jacob Hersant: I’m gonna be, I’m gonna be concerned, trolling you for like 30 minutes now. Be like, how could you say such a thing?

 

[1:35:13]

 

Joel Davis: No, no, I think, I mean realistically, if you tell people to get the out of your country, you don’t actually you kind of can’t force them to go to a particular country because they could just leave that country and go somewhere else else. Right? So like you just better tell them to get the fuck out and then it’s on them to figure out where they’re going.

 

So if you tell jews get the fuck out of Australia and you know, Europeans are telling jews to get out of Europe and Americans are telling jews to get out of America and so on. Obviously they’re just going to go to Israel, like that’s the main place for them to go next.

 

So it is what it is. I don’t give a fuck where they go as long as they get out of our countries, like then the problem is solved. The main problem in the past has been that all western or all White countries didn’t deport jews all at once. It was like this city in Europe says get out jews, let’s move to another city and set up operations there and keep fucking with us. And they just kind of like jumped around different parts of Europe. We have the main I guess issue is you know, and if we just, if we take over Australia and you know, other Western countries still ZOGged out, I guess a lot of jews are going to end up going there because a problem.

 

But ideally they get out of Western countries period. And that’s one thing that I think we could try to control is that when they leave they go to a non-Western country. But we can’t really stop them once they’re gone from where they go from there. Like realistically. Like we will tell when we are trying to do remigrate a lot of these non-Whites, like we’re not going to allow them to remigrate to White countries. We’re going to force them to remigrate to non-White countries. Like we could send them back to India but then America could let them back in. Like we can’t stop it! So there’s only like a certain amount of control we have over that.

 

But at the end of the day we’re anti-jew because we’re pro-White. We’re not anti-jew just for the sake of it. And you know we call out the jews and we criticise the jews openly obviously, but it’s not the be all and end all like we have to have a comprehensive position.

 

But we’ll go through some of these more of these Superchats. Unpopular opinionator said:

 

“Australia needs a nationalist church. Get Professor Andrew Fraser and James Donald to oversee the doctrine. Former group to revise the BCP. Find a renegade Bishop who’s down and you’ll have something.”

 

Well look, sounds great but it’s not the job for me. I don’t think Jacob’s that interested in either. But if you guys want to do that, knock yourself out. Like I would much rather there be racist churches than anti-racist churches. Jacob, do you agree with that?

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah. I agree with that.

 

Joel Davis: [word unclear] said:

 

“Hi guys. How do we address the Christian question? I see many potential White nationalists cucked into Christian nationals.”

 

What a double those two Superchats together. I mean in the National Socialist Network, in White Australia, we’re not anti-Christian. If you’re a Christian, you can join the Organisation as long as you accept the fact that it’s secular, meaning that not everyone in the organisation is of a particular religious faith. As a White Australian, you are free to explore your religious views as you see fit. We don’t allow Muslims, we don’t allow Satanists, we don’t allow Judaism obviously, but we have a few prohibitions.

 

But basically like if you want to go and fucking explore Buddhism or whatever, knock yourself out. You want to be a pagan, you want to be a Christian, you don’t really have a religious view, that’s fine! The function of the organisation is to defend our race. If you agree on its principles, then you can participate. So that’s our position.

 

Obviously the problem with Christian nationalism is this idea that you can define a nation by religion rather than by what a nation is, which is its people. Obviously we disagree with that. I don’t if the country becomes 99% non-White but everyone a Christian, it’s not Australia anymore. It’s some like racial slop that I want no part in.

 

So if you think that, like there’s no reason why as a Christian you have to accept that. The analogy I would use is that like say you’re a Christian and the other people in your family aren’t Christians, does that mean that you abandon your family and you just only associate with Christians that you aren’t related to? And pretend like they’re your family now? That would be ridiculous! Like your family is your family regardless of their religion is.

 

The same thing is true with the nation. Our nation is our nation, our people is our people, regardless of what their religious views are. Fellow Comrade said:

 

“He can see his reflection in my shiny nose.”

 

Do you have anything to say on the Christian question, Jacob?

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, well I wouldn’t come out and attack Christianity. We come out and attack people that are against ethno-nationalists. So if there are Christians that are against ethno-nationalism that then we’re attacking Christians in that way. But people that are ethno-nationalist Christians, we have no point problem with that it’s going to be a disparate group of people that call themselves Christian nationalists. And we support the Christian nationalists that are ethno-nationalists and we oppose the ones that are universalists who think that nationality can be defined by a religion. But we say that nationality is primarily defined by blood. So when we propagandize, we criticise on that basis rather than criticising people for being Christians because we have no problem with Christians who are racists.

 

[1:41:07]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, like Obviously we all have personal views on the subject and in the organisation those views vary. Everyone in the organisation there’s people with different religious views in the organisation.

 

So we don’t have like one official position on religion in the organisation because we allow members to have religious freedom. They become like some stateless lunatic or like a fucking Muslim or something, we draw the line there, but we’re pretty tolerant.

 

[word unclear] said:

 

“Fellow Comrade is a half caste mutt!”

 

Well, interesting. Aussie orders88 said:

 

“How much? , …”

 

I’m not going to read this. I’m not going to give him the satisfaction of this clip. Fellow Comrades said:

 

“How do we stop gay Superchats from everyone except me?”

 

I support gay Superchats because I can just not read them out but I still get your money. So aussie orders 88 said:

 

“Indians saying they are more Australian than us Anglos as they have abo blood is fucking solid. So hilarious! I like that admission by the jeet.”

 

Did you see that Jacob? There was this Indian woman who said:

 

“They have more of a right to be here than we do because they’re related to the Aboriginals as Dravidians and we aren’t.”

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, I did see that.

 

But at the same time they didn’t build anything so they can go to hell! They can get out as far as we’re concerned. They only immigrated here because. Not because of the soil, not because of the mountains, not because of the sea around this continent. But they immigrated because we built a civilisation here that they want to parasitize off. That’s the reality. Everybody understands that. Everyone understands why people are moving to Australia and they’re not moving to Africa, for example. It’s because they want to be economic parasites and they want to. Well, not only economic parasites but they want to be parasites on our civilisation. They want the material comforts that come along with living amongst White people. So they can get out as far as we’re concerned.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Also it’s just embarrassing that you’re genetically related to Aboriginals. Aboriginals are literally the most unimpressive race on the face of the planet. And it doesn’t surprise me that Indians and Aboriginals are related because they’re both vermin that in a better place planet would not exist.

 

Jacob Hersant: Would be sent to Madagascar. Is that what you’re saying?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think. Yeah. Just we probably shouldn’t go over that. Paul Bob said:

 

“How did we stop the March for Australia movement being subverted if there is no NSN presence?”

 

Well, it’ll be an experiment. We’ll see. I mean, there’s a lot of good people involved, so we’ll see how they go. Hopefully, it’s a solid event and but if, you know, it does get subverted, obviously we’ll look into what to do about future events, trying to do more of what we did last time. But from what I’ve seen it’s a solid team.

 

Jacob Hersant: If it gets subverted, then it’s not going to surpass the previous March for Australia. And it doesn’t really matter. If it gets subverted and it’s just a pathetic rally where they’re talking about multiculturalism. Maybe they’ll put on an extra Indian on the stage. Like, it was not bad enough in Brisbane when they put an Indian on the stage. Maybe they’ll put two on the stage next time.

 

But if they do that and it becomes cucked and it becomes pathetic, then it doesn’t really matter. Like the it’s just going to be like the other rally that happened. Nobody cares about it because it’s not controversial and it’s not in opposition of the establishment’s values.

 

The only reason March for Australia mattered was because the National Socialist Network was there to enforce a message that was against the establishment, against mass immigration, actually, for the historic Australian nation, for White Australia. That’s the reason why it was significant, why it was controversial, why it drew so many people out and why it was talked about so much.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but I don’t think it’ll be, … I mean, there’s issues with the Brisbane team. Some of them have made statements that are cucked on race, but I think they got a lot of negative feedback after the last one.

 

And I think they’re trying to pivot into framing that doesn’t offend actual nationalists so much. I don’t think we’re going to have another Indian on the stage. None of them wanted to take responsibility for that they all kept, like, blaming each other and so on, so I don’t think that’ll be reproduced. So it’ll be interesting to see how it goes in Brisbane.

 

But in Sydney and Melbourne, the organisers are solid like Beck and Jesse. From what everything that they’ve said, they’re clearly both nationalists. Jesse’s speech at the Sydney March for Australia was excellent! You know, he’s obviously a nationalist also. Same thing is true about Matt Trihey in Melbourne, who’s going to be running the Melbourne March for Australia. He’s obviously a nationalist.

 

So I don’t think they’re gonna cuck in Sydney and Melbourne. And it’s the same people that were running it last time across the country. So they were pretty solid last time in their bias and their, in their kind of orientation. The messaging was pretty good what they were putting out like officially to the public.

 

[1:46:56]

 

 

So yeah, I think it’s kind of the first one kind of said it like what it is and now it’s just kind of hopefully maintain that trajectory and then you know, we can intervene in the future if necessary as best we can to continue channeling it in the right direction if necessary. But we’ll see how they go now. They got established with the first one, it was a success and see how things go in the future.

 

But you know, again we’re gonna mobilise on Australia Day. We’re willing to take on all the risks associated for Australia Day because Australia Day is one of the most important days of the year. Only the Anzac Day is as important or more important than Australia Day. So we always march on Australia Day and we always will. Let’s see what else we got here. Blah, blah.

 

[word unclear] also said, oh no, sorry, I read that one already. Natalie said:

 

“Will White Australia criminalise race mixing?”

 

The approach that we’re going to take with policies, we are going to not have like a million policies on everything. We’re probably, we’re going to have our core policies, we’re going to put it forward and we’re going to say these are our policies. If we were elected as the government, these are the things, these are like the top 10 priorities in our opinion that need to be fixed.

 

There’s obviously more things that need to be done in general. But these are like 10 or whatever, we haven’t got the exact number. These are the core priorities policy wise and we’re just going to put all our energy as a political party on these things and then once they’re achieved, then we can look at adding the next 10 policies and we can bring them back to the people and see if they want to support us on that. But these are the 10 things we’re going to ask for your support on and try and build a support base on and you can be for it or against it.

 

So I don’t know if making laws about race mixing is worthy of being in that top 10 priority stack because you know, one of our policies is going to be mass deporting non-White.

 

So if you kind of deport all the non-Whites, there’s not going to be much race mixing happening after that point. So ideally it would be banned, it would be illegal I think in an ideal world. But it might not be the, it might not be in the initial list of priorities. Do you have a different opinion? Do you think it needs to be in the policies or?

 

Jacob Hersant: I think people understand that we’re going to criminalise race mixing because we’re going to deport all these non-Whites. I think what you said. Yeah it makes sense. Like we don’t need to say these are our policies and then like seven of them are like all about how we’re going to solve the non-White problem. Like there’s obviously going to be a lot of things. But I think the policy should just be yeah, re-migration and that’s when you say when we say we’re going to re-migrate all these people, all these people understand that there’s also going to be a lot of other things that we’re going to legislate like criminalizing miscegenation.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And when we go to like say we’re in a coalition or we’re working with a coalition of Right-wing parties, like you don’t know how it would end up fleshing out. You know we’re not going to be like well our condition for being in this coalition is that you create anti-miscegenation laws or something. Like we’re obviously going to prioritize like immigration and re-migration policy as like our number one priority for or working with the other groups like make concessions to us here. Maybe we’ll make concessions to you guys on other policies we’re not going to like. So yeah it’s about priority stack. We’re going to put the policies in an order of priority so that when people vote for us it’s like you’re voting for these priorities. Like you know if we have like there’s no point having like policies on like side issues that we’re not going to be, that’s not going to be one of our main issues because you know that’s not what it’s about.

 

So we’re not going to have like 38,000 policies. Fellow Comrade said:

 

“Fat gay black retards for Trump with Down Syndrome!”

 

I don’t know what he’s going on about. Liam Ford said:

 

“What is your advice to guys who have a mixed race kid and now regret it? This advice is not for me by the way. I’m just curious.”

 

Jacob, you want to take this one? What’s your advice?

 

Jacob Hersant: What to do with the mongrel spawn? Just have nothing to do with it! That’s my advice. Like I’ll never get myself in the situation. But if somehow someone. I think VicPol [Victorian police] have my DNA because of the Cathedral Rangers thing, if they somehow like transferred some of those like saliva cells into like sperm and then impregnated a non-White and I sired a child through that, through like what is it called? IVF. If that child appeared before me just randomly, then the only thing to do is to have nothing to do with it. And that’s probably the only time when I will advise someone to abandon a child. You shouldn’t abandon a child if it’s White and it’s yours. No matter how much the issues you have with like the mother or something like that, I’d say never abandon a child if it is of your blood, but if it is not of your blood, then have nothing to do with it.

 

Joel Davis: And if you’re like a total cuck who can’t abandon the kid, then what I would say is get your non-White family and move to wherever the mother is from and go join her tribe. So just basically eat it.

 

[1:52:51]

 

If you want to leave them there and come back, then Jacob’s strategy then even better. But you’re too much of a cuck. Then just stay over there. You got like a half Thai kid, go live in Thailand and just that’s the path you decided. So accept it. If you truly believe that White people should have their own countries, then you should not be in our country anymore because you’re you know, spiritually non-White now. Like you’re literally like in terms of like your bloodline. You’re now, you’ve left the tribe. So see you later!

 

Heidi Ellen said:

 

“Good to see Jacob tonight.”

 

And she threw a Roman with little O slash thing. And she said:

 

“I definitely need women involved at least in terms of political campaign and support roles. We’ll forgive Joel for his misogyny. Race.”

 

Well, there you go. See this is the thing with women. You can get away with misogyny if you earn it, you earn the rights of say misogynistic shit play by doing other things that are so awesome that you outweigh it. To make women not care that we’re misogynists.

 

Jacob Hersant: Did they give you the Misogynist Pass? You need like an actual card printed out, pass.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Jacob Hersant: And you just say:

 

“A woman gave this to me. I’m allowed to say it now. I’m allowed to say insensitive comments about women..”

 

Joel Davis: That would make me not want to do anymore. Because now, like, I’m like, now I’m like, subordinating myself to the gynocracy by like, seeking its approval. So maybe, like, there’s an argument that feminism isn’t so bad. Like, if we’re going to have all these Nazi activists, like, women are girl bossing these days, send your wife to work, let the bitch work, and then focus your time on reading Mein Kampf and doing NSN rallies and so on because they’ve got washing machines and fucking ovens and stuff now, like, being a homemaker is not that hard. Let’s be real. It’s pretty easy.

 

Jacob Hersant: It was funny when you brought it up and [chuckling] you’re like:

 

“I know I’ve said a lot of misogynist things and I apologise for absolutely nothing!”

 

Joel Davis: Oh, I support feminism now. Like you think about it like women, like, if you take like, [words unclear] work seriously, like, if they, if women truly lack, like, subjectivity in the way that men have it. Men should be free to pursue, you know, culture, art, ponder, and we can women there’s like, they just need to be told what to do anyway, so you might as well make money out of it. And so maybe feminism is a good idea. Maybe like the final misogyny red pill is like feminist accelerationism. Free men from ZOG, hard labour! And no, obviously I’m kidding! But Southern Sun 77 said:

 

“What are your thoughts on the Maltese and their devotion to the empire?”

 

I don’t really consider Maltese people White, to be honest. I think from a genetic standpoint, they’re actually less related to us than jews. So I think if you’re going to draw the line where we Keep jews, …

 

Jacob Hersant: Depends on what types of jews obviously, like, there’s different types of jews.

 

Joel Davis: Ashkenazi jews. If we draw the line where Ashkenazi jews are non-White, then we also would have to say Maltese and on non-White.

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah, it depends. I think there would be gradations with Maltese as well. Like there are with Sicilians and Greeks and things like that. So there would be ones that are more miscegenated with North African DNA and Levantine DNA from the history of Barbary piracy.

 

And then there would be ones that are like a little bit more White. But I don’t know, I guess you’d have to do an eye test for people that trying to join White nationalist organisations. There might be ones that are like very swarthy and they look like they’re fully North African.

 

Joel Davis: Philip Mailer said:

 

“What’s your advice on how to meet good women?”

 

Well, I’ll tell you this, good women, they should sign up as political supporters, come down to the White Australia seminars and events and you can meet a man of, who has far-Right beliefs. There’s a lot of women out there complaining they can’t find good men and so on. Well, here’s your chance. Join, join us. And there’s plenty of young bachelors at those events. And then I would say to you, sir, come down and pick up one of these fine ladies.

 

Do you have any advice, Jacob?

 

Jacob Hersant: Well, you just gotta go somewhere where there actually are women. You could just go out on the streets and start talking to random people. I don’t think most people are going to do that because there’s a lot of, it’s like, takes a lot of energy to be able to like go and talk to strangers. But you gotta join, you just gotta go. It could be anything. You could go into a profession that has women in it. You could go to university. There’s a lot of women there. You just need to go somewhere where there actually are women that you can start interacting with and then start, start talking to them.

 

That’s the most, [chuckling] that’s what a lot of people need to do because some people are spending too much time, especially people that are far-Right. We have interests that are male dominated so there’s not really that much opportunity to go out and find women. So I say you just the main thing is to go out and expose your. That was like the worst way to say that don’t expose yourself to women, but go and find women where they are. Yeah, [chuckling] that’s like the worst way to be say that! Don’t expose yourself to women! [chuckling]

 

[1:58:57]

 

Joel Davis: David P said:

 

“Never have I felt more proud than I was marching alongside fellow common sense patriots on the 31st. Keep up the good work, lads. Hail Sewell! Hail White Australia!”

 

Well, that’s a nice Chungus. Superchat. Aussie orders88 said:

 

“What’s your favourite song off Taylor Swift’s new album?”

 

Well, what kind of, … I’m not going to read the rest of that. What kind of question is that? RSA Liberty said:

 

“I joined late. Did you cover the NSN MFA press release? Hail Thomas Sewell!”

 

We did earlier in the show. Aussie orders 88 said:

 

“We looked up the mortgage numbers. Australian banks collect 20 billion a month in mortgage repayments. The average household would save 30k a year if mortgages were interest free.”

 

Some good, some good facts. [words unclear] said:

 

“TND. How do we avoid these national marches being taken over by the wrong crowd?”

 

We already dealt with that. Fellow Comrade said:

 

“When I think of politics, I think of mullets. When is Jacob going to grow out a mullet? It’s the right thing to do.”

 

That’s a it’s a great Superchat actually. I think it’s absolutely fantastic Superchat!

 

Jacob Hersant: I’m gonna stick to this style. This is my style and I’m not somebody that changes very quickly. So I think you’re going to be seeing me clean shaven with the short hair indefinitely.

 

Joel Davis: James UK 76 said:

 

“Hail the NSN! Love from White Vanguard!”

 

Well, I’m seeing White Vanguard getting out on the streets and doing something over in Britain which is admirable! And they stole our jackets but it looks cool so that they’re welcome to steal our jacket selection.

 

Jacob Hersant: They can take it. People are free to take whatever they want from our organising. If they want to wear the black, the Black Shirt, we support it. If you want to say “White Man Fight Back”, we support it. We want people to take up these bits of propaganda because the reason we do it is because we see value in it. So if other countries, groups, want to do that, we fully support that.

 

Joel Davis: Fellow Comrade said:

 

“Can you recommend me some women to Superchat?”

 

No, keep Superchatting me. Why do you want to give women your money?

 

Jacob Hersant: We got to get you on OnlyFans Joel. So that all the OnlyFans simps can send you money instead of these online prostitutes.

 

Joel Davis: Real! Yeah. Although I got some moves, I got some moves I think that people will appreciate. Kee five 5 said:

 

“How would you contrast NSN with what Patriot Front is doing in the US? They seem similar but less militant than you guys.”

 

I wouldn’t really say that that’s the main distinction. I think they probably have a lot of similarities in like how they are organised and how they do like street actions and stuff. I think probably the main distinction is more like the tone, like the approach to act like the kind of goals with activism and yeah like obviously like there’s a bit of an ideological distinction. They’re not National Socialists. So yeah. But I think the differences speak for themselves. I don’t really need to like explain them. If you don’t get it, then maybe just pay more attention. But obviously we’re friends with the Patriot Front guys.

 

Aussie orders 88 said:

 

“I’m reading these in a weird order.”

 

That’s correct. But trying to get through them all. BigWhite94 said:

 

“Much support. I love you lads. You give White men hope in the struggle.”

 

That’s a very nice thing to say. And Flo Bubba Noonga said:

 

“Thoughts on the British-Australian Community? Are they Zionists?”

 

I don’t think the British-Australian Community has a position on zionism. I think there’s some people in their organisation that are Zionists, but there’s also many people in their organisation who are critical of Israel and critical of jews even so there’s a bit of a spectrum. That’s what I’ve seen from the outside looking in. My general thought in the British-Australian Community is that I don’t think it’s the correct strategy for us to just start behaving like a minority, just to accept minority status and then just try and get a seat at the table of multiculturalism. I think that’s capitulation. And I don’t think it’s particularly inspiring. I don’t think it’ll work.

 

 

[See: Snitch journalism at the Sydney Morning Herald]

 

The justification that I heard given by Frank Salter for it is:

 

“Well, even if it doesn’t work, it’ll prove that multiculturalism is anti-White and anti-Anglo!”

 

It’s like, we don’t need you to prove that! Like it’s already pretty blatant. So I don’t really see the point in that, I think.

 

But fundamentally, them trying to advocate for the interests of Anglo Australians, I do support that, because I’m an Anglo Australian. I want people advocating for my interests and there are good people that are involved.

 

So I don’t have like an issue with them. But at the same time, obviously we have our own organisation where we do things differently because was if we agreed with their approach to things, we would be part of their organisation and doing it their way rather than our way.

 

So what do you think? Do you have thoughts on the British-Australian Community Jacob? I know you’ve known guys in the organisation and have known about them for some time. So you probably have, …

 

Jacob Hersant: I don’t know a lot of people in the BAC anymore. I knew more people back when it was Mark Moncrief in control of it, but now it’s, I think its Frank Salter that’s in charge. But it may be someone else.

 

Joel Davis: Harry Richardson is the president. Frank Salter seems to be kind of like a bit of a spokesperson of sorts and like the most well known public intellectual or something. But he’s not actually the president.

 

[2:05:30]

 

Jacob Hersant: Yeah. I don’t agree with a lot of the branding. Like coming up with the word “Anglophobia” and things like that. I think “anti-White” has already been mainstreamed and everyone. That’s what we use.

 

There was a recent article that came out about two people that are involved in the BAC. This Leftist piece of shit journalist was trying to get them fired. But at the bottom of the article, these two people who were involved were cucking and saying:

 

“We don’t even use the word ‘White’ because we don’t want to be associated with the people who use the word White.”

 

And they were saying, …

 

Joel Davis: That wasn’t the two of them. That was just what Stephen Chavura said. It wasn’t what McInerney said.

 

Jacob Hersant: Oh yeah.

 

Joel Davis: McInerney is better, much better than Chavura. McInerney criticises jews and he’s obviously, … That’s why I cut you off! Just because I don’t, …

 

Jacob Hersant: I’m glad you cleared that up because. Yeah. But yeah, saying that kind of stuff is crazy! It’s like they’re watering down something that has already been mainstreamed. People do talk about being White. People do talk about the fact that this government is anti-White and they wanna change it? Yeah, I don’t understand it. I don’t like it. We’re gonna stick to being White Australians and we’re going to be talking about the anti-White nature of this system.

 

And the reality is we are in line with the historic Australian nation. When they came up with a policy, they called it the White Australia Policy. They didn’t call it the Anglo-Australian policy. They didn’t talk about Anglophobia or anything like. Well, they didn’t even really talk about anti-White because it wasn’t an issue back then. But they would be talking about anti-White. They would be talking about White Australians. So we continue in that tradition.

 

Joel Davis: It’s also weird, like Stephen Chavura is the guy that’s going to lecture us on how we should refer to ourselves as Anglo-Celtic rather than White. But he’s not even Anglo-Celtic. Like Chabura, that’s not a Angelo last name. That’s not a Scottish, …

 

Jacob Hersant: What ethnicity is it?

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know exactly, but you can tell by looking at him that he’s clearly not an Anglo.

 

And again, I’m not saying that he’s not White obviously, but just kind of makes it even more silly.

 

And then he also said in those comments he doesn’t like using the term “White Australia”. Number one is he’s going to be associated with people who use that term, i.e., us.

 

And number two, because for him it’s not just about race, it’s also about culture. But like, culture obviously comes from race. What are you saying? You can be culturally Anglo-Celtic without actually being of our stock? That doesn’t actually make any sense.

 

So it’s kind of like a silly position. He also started an organisation recently called Australian Sons where they said that they would welcome non-Whites in who are Christians.

 

Jacob Hersant: Hmmm, …

 

Joel Davis: So it shows that he is weak on the race question. And I don’t think the other members, … All the other members of the BAC are much better on the question. So I wouldn’t want to say that he, his personal positions are indicative of the BAC in general. I think BAC allows people like him to be involved, but there’s a spectrum in this that they allow.

 

So I don’t think it’s fair to slander the BAC as a Zionist organisation. But I think it’s fair to criticise them for tolerating zionism because I don’t think they should tolerate it. I don’t think people who defend the state of Israel can be truly trusted as advocates for our people. Because jews are very clearly a hostile group that is directly antagonistic to our interests of people.

 

 

And even in Frank Salter’s book Anglophobia, which I read, I agree with you, by the way, that I don’t think it’s a term that we should really adopt because anti-White is far more mainstream than Anglophobia. And also using terms that have phobia in it is weaker than anti. Like jews don’t call you know, Judeophobic. They use anti-semitic. That’s more like potent as a phrase.

 

Jacob Hersant: And the very issue is that these people aren’t Anglophobic. They aren’t scared of us! [chuckling] That’s why they’re doing what they’re doing! If they were scared of us, they wouldn’t even come here! They’re just anti-White. That’s why they’re being so aggressive against us.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly!

 

So it’s just like a, it’s the wrong term. They want to say anti-Anglo, I’d say that’s better than saying Anglophobic. Because a lot of these are anti-Anglo too. Like for example, like Indians are very animated by an anti-Anglo animus specifically because of their grievances about being colonised by the British Empire and so on.

 

So I’m not obviously we’re not hostile to advocacy for Anglo-Australians or something like that. Some organisation should exist to advocate for Anglo-Australian interests. But that’s the other thing as well. They say:

 

“Oh, we advocate for Anglo-Australians and everyone who had. Everyone who has assimilated into the Anglo Australian stock.”

 

For most people in the BAC, only White people can do that. So then you basically are advocating for White Australians then because that basically is everyone who’s White. Or you’re like Stephen Chavura and you kind of leave it more ambiguous because you want to be able to go on Sky News and you know, you go to a church full of Zionists that you associate with or something. So then he waters it down even further. Where it’s:

 

“Well, Anglos are a distinct ethnic group that should be maintained as a majority, but it’s more about British culture. And if like non — Whites adopt British values then they can become part of our national family.”

 

And then it’s like you’re a hop, skip and jump away from like who we basically are, like a civic nationalist at that point. Then like what? Once you water it down to that level then like what position do you even have? He seems to be a foot on both sides of the fence guy, Stephen Chavura.

 

So I don’t respect him. Pick a team!

 

[2:11:50]

 

But I will say this, that most of the people in the BAC have picked the right team. I just don’t agree with the strategy. In Frank Salter’s book Anglophobia, he criticises the jewish influence, jewish lobby. So give him credit for that. He doesn’t cuck on the jewish question. And Stephen McInerney criticises jewish influence as well. So like a lot of their public facing people do criticise jewish influence.

 

So yeah, Matthew Maculatorin said:

 

“So when Jacob goes to prison, that’s when the mullet and full beard comes, like Stephen Wells?”

 

Jacob Hersant: I think you can get haircuts in there. I don’t think you have to grow it out.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think if I go to prison I’ll shave it off. I’ll become a prison skinhead. Big White 94 said:

 

“Much support and love to you lads.”

 

Oh, I already read that one. So nice. I read it twice, I guess.

 

And I think that could be basically it. Oh, crazy recluse. Last Superchat:

 

“Lebs [Lebanese] run a lot of Australian prisons. Is that a problem that they may try to target a strong White man like Tom in there?”

 

Well, number one, Tom is isolated from the other prisoners because, not because they’re worried about him being attacked. They’ll be quite fine with him being attacked. They’re worried about him organising all the White boys in jail into a giant [chuckling] prison gang! Recruiting them to the NSN when they get out and him taking over the prisons. So they put him in very restricted conditions, solitary conditions. So he will be fine.

 

But also what I’ve heard from Tom is that when he was getting marched through the aisle of the jail and Lebos saw him from their jail cells or whatever, they were yelling out support because they saw that the NSN beat up Abby Yemeni’s bodyguards and they were throwing Romans and found that to be quite amusing! So I don’t know, maybe there’s a certain amount of respect that he has from that community.

 

So also, it’s Melbourne. Melbourne doesn’t have as many lebos as Sydney. It’s different. But yeah. I think that could be it for the show tonight. Is there anything you wanted to touch on before we, … Oh, wait, one more Superchat, Georgie L said:

 

“Thank the gods a White man.”

 

And she sent a love heart. Well, that’s very nice of you. See, on the Joel and Jacob show, we are massive respecters of women, unlike The Joel and Blair Show where we usually, … [chuckling]

 

Is there anything you want to say before the end of the stream?

 

Jacob Hersant: No, I think we covered a lot. I think it was a good show. I’m happy to come on whenever. It normally just takes a lot for me to set up things, but now that I’ve got my new Rune background, I should be able to come on more frequently.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, it’s a sick background, but yeah, it’s a good show. Good to have you on a stream where we have Blair as well. I do like the three man streams as well. Two man is cozy. Three men sometimes can be dynamic, but, …

 

Jacob Hersant: Dynamic! [chuckling] No. Thank you for having me on. Blood and honour!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Hail victory! White power! You said blood and honour so I didn’t have to. And White Australia.org! Go to White Australia.org and join. Become a political support. Or even better, come one of the men in black, become an activist. Come down, we’ll teach you how to kickbox. Or you already know how to. Even better, you can beat up some of the guys who don’t know how to kickbox yet and teach them how to kickbox. And march with us. We got plenty of activism planned and it’s going to be a lot happening. So join the movement and we’ll see you next time.

 

 

[2:15:54]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 10/7/2025 = 73)

[Latest at top]

007lyse
7 hours ago
Life Chain in northern not so On terrible anymore polled 80 thumbs up (not including 60people there) to 12 thumbs down. The degenerates are dwindling. Poor lame death cultists are unaware 2 middle fingers is way worse than one. Lol
0 likes

frosty85
8 hours ago
Joel get a new microphone, your sound is terrible compared to jacobs.
0 likes

ForRealers
16 hours ago
Left Wing / Right Wing, should now be defined as: Brown Wing / White Wing… or…. just identify the left as anti white wing
1 like

TinyHatRemover
Supporter
18 hours ago
Send the jews to India.
5 likes

palacepony
SubSupporter
18 hours ago
Keith Woods in Poland & Germany; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylx6R8zz670
0 likes

katana17
18 hours ago
[Joel Davis – Ain’t No Party Like the White Australia Party – Oct 5, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/10/06/joel-davis-aint-no-party-like-the-white-australia-party-oct-5-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Jacob Hersant discuss the following:

1. Jacob Hersant appears as guest host, while Blair takes a week off, discussing daylight savings and its German origins during WWI.

2. Jacob argues that people motivated by politics for non-racist reasons have “something wrong with them” as politics involves “debates over minutia.”

3. They criticise Gerard Rennick’s new party for being “extremely boring” and focused on policies that won’t “grab headlines” or motivate strong emotions.

4. Jacob explains their political strategy: “controversy is currency in, particularly on the political Right in the contemporary era.”

5. They discuss building toward establishing a political party, needing 1, 500 supporters across Australia to register federally.

6. Progress has been delayed due to charges against members following the “Camp Sovereignty incident” where “anti-fascists were attacking Australian patriots.”

7. Thomas Sewell (national leader) and another member are currently in prison, with bail hearings being organised.

8. Joel notes One Nation has “doubled its vote according to the polls” and is now “polling at like 13%” above the Greens.

9. They identify a “massive gap in the market for a kind of youth focused nationalism” as existing parties appeal mainly to “boomers.”

10. Jacob explains legal benefits of party registration, and currently how: “Victoria police will lie through their teeth and say this isn’t a political organisation at all! This isn’t a registered political party. It’s a criminal group.”

11. Joel argues the party provides “a way for the Australian public to buy into the movement en masse” as a “soft on ramp.”

And more, …..
1 like

Delete
bobbytimms
20 hours ago
white woman step up and stop banging blk and brown. stop the social media brain washing and normalization of degeneracy
2 likes

bobbytimms
20 hours ago
local politicians, immigration agents, real estate agents, local councils, NGO, lobbyists, some church groups, immigrant services, ethnic councils, libraries, business people, building developers and investors, are the main enemies in your area! act locally.
1 like

bobbytimms
20 hours ago
some advice, if u gonna to enter the political arena , u need experience. get some guys to find jobs within the AEC, go to local council meetings and enter local council elections undercover, volunteer for other parties, go to election booth, volunteer as scrutineers at voting day, and speak to people. most of the NWO and immigration in done through local councils.! they corrupt asf
1 like

Sieger88
Supporter
22 hours ago
The whole Weeb culture is why White men are into Asians.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
BrossefStalin
15 hours ago
Also because they are more feminine than the feminist brainwashed White women. They are still traditional mostly if their parents still retain Asian culture
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
Sub
1 hour ago
those “traditional” asians very quickly succumb to kosher feminism from their new “western” girlfriends and turn into even viler women so as well as destroying your genetic heritage you are worse off in the end with yellow fever.
0 likes

Snow_Whitee
1 day ago
So, where does one find an original copy of Mein Kampf without Jewish commentary?
0 likes

‹ Hide 4 replies
RealTruePatriot
1 day ago
The most recent and best translation is by Thomas Dalton. This is a good site to purchase a physical copy from: https://www.clemensandblair.com/catalog/mein-kampf-two-volumes Or you can download free PDFs here: https://archive.org/details/mein-kampf-vol-1-2-dalton-translation-by-thomas-dalt-240208-110759 https://archive.org/details/mein-kampf-redpill-action-publications-2021 Or you can listen to audiobook: https://t.me/HeebWatch/3757
3 likes

‹ Hide 3 replies
SackOPossums
1 day ago
Stalag or nothing. https://archive.org/details/meinkampf_202404
0 likes

Snow_Whitee
21 hours ago
Perfect. Thank you! Exact type of bookstore I was looking for too.. Won’t let me join the telegram channel, I prefer reading anyway but thanks for all the info
0 likes

SackOPossums
1 day ago
https://ostarapublications.com/product/mein-kampf-stalag-edition/ An exact reproduction of the only official English translation produced by the NSDAP, meant to be given to POWs to sway their favor while captured. Good quality and affordable. If you just want access to the text, it is archived and available for free here: https://archive.org/details/meinkampf_202404
2 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
Snow_Whitee
21 hours ago
Oh, interesting.. have you read the Dalton one as well as this one? Curious to know if there’s a huge difference? I’ll probably eventually look into both. Thanks so much!
0 likes

AmalekAvenger
1 day ago
the Dalton translation is the best … please get that one
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
Snow_Whitee
21 hours ago
Thank you!!
0 likes

Neqis
1 day ago
I could listen to these guys talking about interracial couples forever, golden content
2 likes

Scovell7
Supporter
1 day ago
Abandon your child because they are mixed race? You guys come across as fanatical at times.
-2 likes

Keane55
VerifiedSupporter
1 day ago
Man, Jacob’s setup is killer
5 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
AmalekAvenger
1 day ago
yes. he needs to help joel sort out his studio and sound. Joel always sounds like he is in a drum or silo
3 likes

imSofaKingRayZest
Sub
1 day ago
2 things wrong with the white australia policy, 1, it ended and 2, it let in jews.
7 likes

Motown88
Supporter
1 day ago
National Socialism would be neither far right nor far left, it would seem to be more centrist with a mixture of socialist policy for supporting the collectivisation of White Aussies and conservative capitalist in terms of our heritage preservation and encouragement of individual meritocracy.
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
Neqis
1 day ago
It would probably be the most accurate to call it Authoritarian or radical centrism, if we are to use the traditional political compass.
0 likes

evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 day ago
Look….. there exist Arab and Persian women who are hotter than any white woman I’ve seen.
-7 likes

‹ Hide 4 replies
ArchipelagoWoes
Supporter+
1 day ago
Gay and retarded.
4 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
1Antonius
1 day ago
Your guru, Hersant, has visible Iranic traits.
-3 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 day ago
Like what?
1 like

SackOPossums
1 day ago
Then breed out. We don’t need you if you don’t have strong enough in-group preference to not stick it in a sand snatch.
2 likes

evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 day ago
Let’s clarify: The average white woman is 10x hotter than the average woman from any other race. In the range of extreme beauty, however, there exist hotter Middle East women, just barely. Nonetheless, is incumbent upon white men to only reproduce with white women.
1 like

‹ Hide 3 replies
1Antonius
1 day ago
Like his nose, eyes, eyebrows and hair color.
0 likes

1Antonius
1 day ago
The situation we’re facing is dire and not every man will have an opportunity to find his “perfect” white match. Finding an European looking middle eastern (Arab, Persian Turkish/Ottoman) willing to give you 7 kids is much more beneficial than standing around and coping. Just my 5cents…
0 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 day ago
This is a controversial take but I agree. It’s hard to formulate easily understandable rules for this though, so I’m fine with the mantra remaining “Only date white” since someone will bang an afro-arab and say “I thought you said we could bang arabs!” With genetic testing, I think we’ll be able to pick out those North Indian / Iranian / Arab women who are as Aryan as a blonde Swede. When everyone’s genome is mapped and public, then perhaps an easily understandable rule could be formulated, like “Only mate with >90% Yamnaya-descended women” or some such.
0 likes

1Antonius
20 hours ago
Yes, it is controversial and as you can see most morons here who happen to behave identically to the retards they pretend hating will downvote you to hell. These are hard times, man, and not everyone has the luxury of others.
0 likes

1Antonius
1 day ago
I agree. Their fetishism of blondes is pathetic.
-5 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
SackOPossums
1 day ago
Blondes? I only dig white women and don’t even prefer blondes.
1 like

Gurifisu
1 day ago
Love seeing Jacob on the show. o/
9 likes

RomanSaluter
1 day ago
BLAIR SUCKS AND IS RETARDED! KEEP JACOB AND TOM! FUCK BLAIR!
-8 likes

BasedKyubey
Supporter
1 day ago
Jacob Hersant looks like an AI.
6 likes

RealTruePatriot
1 day ago
Eric Striker was recently chimping out at European nationalists because they don’t like seeing their national monuments vandalized by pro-Palestine Antifa rioters. I used to enjoy some of the historical material covered on Warstrike, but he has completely lost the plot.
9 likes

‹ Hide 3 replies
v0lum3
1 day ago
Striker is brown himself. It’s no surprise he has become a third worldist, like Fuentes.
5 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 day ago
Italian?
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
v0lum3
1 day ago
He’s Puerto Rican or something.
0 likes
Neqis
1 day ago
I love Warren but can’t stand Striker, wish Warren dropped him and teamed up with someone better
3 likes

SackOPossums
1 day ago
WarStrike is one of the dumbest shows in the sphere. No idea why it’s as popular as it is. Pretty sure Striker is some flavor of white-adjacent non, like a puerto rican or something similar.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ArchipelagoWoes
Supporter+
17 hours ago
Your low IQ reply is why you don’t get the show.
0 likes

RealTruePatriot
1 day ago
Here’s a crazy fact that White normies really need to hear: If you have a mixed-race child, you are more closely genetically related to some random White child that you see walking down the street than you are to your own mixed-race child. If you want to perpetuate your genetic material, it’s better to adopt a White child than have a mixed-race child. https://x.com/JFGariepy/status/1827386764673028112
22 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
Motown88
Supporter
1 day ago
No coal burning, no oil drilling and keep off the rice wine…
4 likes

White_Dogs_House
1 day ago
Can’t get organ transplants. Can’t receive bone marrow. Wait till you see the artificial organ and cybernetics market boom.
3 likes

RealTruePatriot
1 day ago
Red Indians are around 2% of the US population. Unless you live in Alaska, near a reservation, or go to one of their casinos, you rarely see them. Also, a lot of them have White admixture at this point. It’s not the 1700s anymore. I used to hook up with one, and I was certain that she was White. She claimed to be native, and I told her she was full of shit, so she pulled out her tribal membership card to show me. In the US, Gen-Z is 40% Hispanic, so that’s why you’ll see low-tier White guys with them.
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
Neqis
1 day ago
It’s probably much less than 2%, it’s just cool and comes with benefits to identify as non-White. Same thing happened in Brazil, where the population of people who identify as mixed or native blew up because it stopped being cool to be just White, also in Australia so many Whites identify as aboriginals because it is cool and gives them an identity..
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
BrossefStalin
16 hours ago
Crazy that identifying as the race that conquered the world and invented everything was propagandized to be “not cool” such a losers mentality
0 likes

TheShowgun
Supporter+
1 day ago
Fuck i missed the stream
0 likes

katana17
1 day ago
[The Offaly Offensive – Tim Lutze – Part 2 – Sep 27, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/09/27/the-offaly-offensive-tim-lutze-part-2-sep-27-2025-transcript/ [In Part 2 Graham Connolly continues with his talk with Aussie nationalist and State Leader of White Australia Tim Lutze about how his boxing gym, Legacy, was forced to close, and subsequent involvement in political rallies with the NSN, including the recent massive March for Australia event. – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 22,475 – Duration: 107 mins]
2 likes

Delete
1Antonius
1 day ago
Why have you still not addressed the issue some people pointed out in the top comments of your previous live-video ?
-3 likes

‹ Hide 5 replies
RealTruePatriot
1 day ago
Tom is not a snitch. He did not snitch while in prison. This is old drama that subversives are trying to start up. Tom was in communication with other based White guys while in prison. The guys were located in a different area of the prison, so they exchanged letters through the mail. They discussed having Tom ask to be moved to the same cell block as them. This is a common practice in Australia. The prison staff regularly facilitates such requests and places similar races together. None of this was a secret. All prison communications are monitored. The prison staff could see that he was in communication with those guys and that they were friends. It was not a secret to the prison staff. Asking to be moved into the same cell block as your friends after they all discuss it is not snitching.
8 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
Carnierge
Supporter
1 day ago
Some of the people let’s just say in the more wignat proximate spaces are more privy to gaol lingo and prison etiquette, and they don’t like what Sewell said in that clip you’re referring to nobody else. People who are more Nat con, further right conservatives, ethnat lites, groyper adjacent etc don’t care because they aren’t interested in the criminal underworld aryan prison gang thing and have never been to prison because they don’t break the law. This is an issue for people who care about Australian prison politics to have. Stay out of prison but if you do go in try and come home as quick as you can. If Sewell ever gets sorted back into the main it might be the worst thing to happen to him so the governor did him a favour by not obliging.
1 like

‹ Hide 1 reply
RealTruePatriot
1 day ago
If any of those guys that were in prison with Tom thought that Tom had snitched on them, they could have come forward at any time. Prison politics in the US is not like Australia. This is some drama that Hammer started a couple of years ago when he got butthurt about Tom saying that men in South Africa need to kill rapists. Hammer was on stream with Tom and said nothing at the time about Tom being a snitch, but decided to bring it up later when he was mad at Tom.
3 likes

1Antonius
1 day ago
Personally, I would like them to come forward, acknowledge this and be transparent about it. But they don’t… And that’s a big minus.
1 like

RealTruePatriot
1 day ago
That old video is from the Truthslap channel on Bitchute. That guy is a schizophrenic who fedjackets everyone. You look like a subversive trying to share anything from that nutjob.
5 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
1Antonius
1 day ago
You’re babbling about fedjacketing, but you’re doing exactly the same thing, you fucking moron, LOL.
1 like

FlubbaBubbaNoonga
Supporter
1 day ago
What was the issue
2 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
RealTruePatriot
1 day ago
Some schizophrenic named Truthslap on Bitchute is a nutjob who fedjackets everyone in the scene. Tom did not snitch on anyone.
4 likes

› Show 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
Sub
1 day ago
vid of him admiting to being a snitch
1 like

‹ Hide 2 replies
RealTruePatriot
1 day ago
Tom asked to be transferred to the same cell block as his friends. The prison staff already knew that they were his friends because all communications are monitored and they were sending letters through the mail between their different cell blocks. The friends encouraged Tom to come join them. This is a common practice in Australian prisons. You have to be a bad actor or extremely misinformed to suggest that Tom is a snitch.
8 likes

imSofaKingRayZest
Sub
1 day ago
i thought as much but as it was mentioned in the last vid a few have felt it needed to be cleared up
0 likes

WhiteBitchTripleSix
Supporter+
1 day ago
Perhaps join the NSM if you like pointless drama so much and not accomplishing anything.
0 likes

SackOPossums
1 day ago
Because it was addressed… in the same stream the clip was from… 4 fucking years ago. The context is clear. You’re either retarded or intentionally subversive.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
1Antonius
20 hours ago
Not everyone was around 6 years ago you fuckface ! And I don’t care for you to explain the situation. I want Joel and the heads of this organization to come out as transparent. Absolute moron you guys are… A man asking for clarification and I get you retards instead. Reddit-level mongrels.
0 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live. It is The Joel and Blair Show this evening, but at the moment it’s just the Joel show because Blair is having a couple of technical difficulties which is getting sorted now, so he’ll be joining us soon.

 

But yeah, it’s just the Joel show so far. But the past week has been quite something. I think the national rallies on 31st of August was something truly incredible! There was, by my math, over 100,000 patriots marching across Australia with their Australian flags against mass immigration. We haven’t seen anything on that scale in Australia in a very long time. And it’s completely changed the perception, it’s completely changed the conversation. It is now being accepted by a larger and larger swathe of society that nationalism is a serious political force in this country, a force that many thought was dead, many thought was long gone. Well, they were wrong! Nationalism is back and it’s back in a big way!

 

Today is the 7th of September [2025] and yeah, the world saw scenes of Australian patriots marching in every city of Australia, filling up the streets. And these were rallies which were explicitly nationalist coded. They were explicitly pro-White, they were explicitly pro-Australian. They demanded an end to mass immigration. There were speeches given across the country, some by members of the National Socialist Network, including myself, and also some by other figures and across the board. The speeches given at the rally were not just immigration restrictionists, but nationalist in tone. The Zionists were kept out, the conservatives were kept out. There were no foreign flags except for a few annoying people with Aboriginal flags that were humiliated by the crowd. And what we saw was a proper nationalist mass mobilisation, the first of many to come, I hope. And it was quite something, it was quite special.

 

So, yeah, I was just very emboldened to see it. I was expecting it. I was expecting it to be what it was, but to see it actually materialise, to look back, because I was at the front of the march in Sydney, to look back down the street and just see an endless sea of patriots all the way back was quite the spectacle. And there’s a lot to break down, obviously, events all over the country.

 

But then if that wasn’t enough drama, if that wasn’t enough cinema, I mean, what happened in Melbourne was something else. I was in Sydney, but in Melbourne, the NSN literally had to fight their way through Antifa all day to get into the march. In a video that I’m sure you’ve all seen now of the NSN bashing the fuck out of Antifa to get themselves into the march.

 

But then also at the front of the march because there was a series of blockades that were set up on the march route by Leftists, by communists, that the NSN literally had to bash their way through to ensure the march to get to its destination. Then they get to Parliament. They set everything up. They have some brilliant speeches. Thomas Sewell gives an excellent speech with the theme fundamentally that we have to end mass immigration so that we can again become a nation, that Australia is no longer really a nation, that Australia has become this multicultural multiracial soup that’s lost its identity. And this was the assertion of the White Australian patriots that we’re not going to give up our country without a fight! Incredible scenes.

 

Then on their way back from the rally, the boys encountered the Antifa that had been fighting all day who were continuing to harass and attack patriots that were on their way home from the march, going back to their cars and so on. There were actually two patriots, you know, draped in Aussie flags that this horde of communists went down and punched on with and attempted to beat up. And the boys heard about this and where the boys actually parked when they arrived happened to be right near the Antifa staging ground, which was the so-called “Camp Sovereignty”, which is an illegal loitering encampment of communists and Aboriginal activists asserting some kind of Aboriginal ownership over the land or some garbage like this. Now I believe that the people that the NSN fought with at Camp Sovereignty, they were not actually the standard abos that just hang out there. The people that they fought with were random Antifa agitators who they’d been fighting with all day, the same crowd.

 

And so they confronted them. Another fight ensued, another flawless NSN victory ensued. The footage was then portrayed in the media like as if the NSN just went up there and started bashing abos for no reason, which is false. And then many arrests were made, including of Thomas Sewell, the leader of the organisation, who was subsequently denied bail. You know, kind of ridiculous, with a ridiculous reasoning. Because in Victoria you pretty much get bail for anything. They give bail to murderers, they give pet bail to manslaughters, they give bail to people who do home invasions, to people who have machete fights. You can do basically anything in Melbourne and get bail. For them to deny Thomas Sewell bail was egregious miscarriage of justice. He is currently in a jail cell.

 

The feeling in the leadership of the organisation is that we are going to try and do everything we can to get Thomas back out on bail and we will pursue legal avenues once more evidence has been collected to pursue that end. But considering the political bias in the court system, that is not necessarily super likely to be successful. It has a chance of success, but it’s not super likely to be successful.

 

And so as a result, we could be looking at a year, two years without Thomas Sewell. Well in public, he might be in a jail cell for a long period of time.

 

Also, the charges against him are quite serious. Many accounts of assault, violent disorder, other charges. You know, he’s probably going to have to do a shift in jail. So that’s just the reality of the situation. It sucks, but that’s where we’re at.

 

I see Blair is now ready.

 

Hello, Blair. You’ve arrived.

 

[07:12]

 

Blair Cottrell: Hey, guys, I’m testing this little microphone thing I have. Can everyone hear me? You can hear me okay?

 

Joel Davis: Yep, can hear you fine.

 

Blair Cottrell: Let me just double check. The audio is coming through, test. Yes, it is. Thank you for having me and thanks for being patient.

 

I’m in a position right now where I’m not set up the way I would usually be, so I’m not running with my usual setup. I was listening to what you were saying, though, and, man, those marches, let me start off by saying, were much bigger than I expected. Huge numbers! Blew my expectations out of the water in every state! What do you think, Joel? Were you expecting that many people? Were you surprised?

 

Joel Davis: It was exactly what I was expecting. I said tens of thousands in the major cities and according to media reports, 15 to 20,000 in Sydney, which felt about right. I would say 20,000. In Melbourne, it looked like just as many. In Adelaide, media reported 15,000. There were big reports in Brisbane and Perth, I think of a similar size. Then there were small rallies in Hobart and Canberra, in Townsville and lots of other towns. Which is why I estimated that the total national turnout was over 100,000 people, which for a grassroots anti-immigration rally that is promoted through social media over the space of a month to turn out over 100,000 people, it shows that the mood of the country is hungry for the return of nationalism and that a new nationalist movement is about to be born in Australia with a serious mass movement.

 

Blair Cottrell: People are definitely unhappy. Yeah, I just breathed in some water when I drank it.

 

But, yeah, people are definitely unhappy. People are definitely unhappy. The march seemed like a success. Do you feel it was a success? Like, do you feel that there was more gained than what was lost?

 

Joel Davis: It was an incredible success. In every conceivable metric, I think. What aspect of it could not be considered a success?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, Thomas Sewell going to jail.

 

Joel Davis: Yes, that. I guess that obviously is a setback, but frankly, the impetus for that was a brawl that occurred after the march was over.

 

So I don’t know if we can chalk that up to being the march. Obviously it was related, but I don’t think that takes away from the march. I think that the march spoke for itself. I think a lot of lessons were learnt. There was a lot of discussion in the lead up to the march:

 

“Oh, well, if the Nazis are there, then the media is going to decry it as a Nazi rally and no one will want to show up and no one will support the rally!”

 

Well, that was shown completely false!

 

First of all, I’ve noticed absolute radio silence from the jews all week. The jews did not attack this rally! The jews have barely spoken about the fact that Nazis were on the stage giving speeches in every major city at this rally other than Brisbane. The jews have completely kept their mouth shut about this rally because incredibly, they’ve shown the sense that it would be a really bad look for them because obviously a lot of the clashes between counter-protesters and patriots, they were between communists and patriots. But the communists obviously stylised themselves in the pro-Palestinian garb. And so there’s this kind of Palestine versus Aussies optic that obviously the jews don’t want to undermine.

 

And so the jews have kept kind of silent about it, even though Nazis and anti-semites were all over this rally, which was quite something. Not all jews have kept their mouth shut, but generally speaking, they’ve been quite quiet.

 

Also the prime minister who came out in the days before the rally pre-emptively condemning it, saying that White supremacists and Nazis were involved and so on. What he then said after the rally was:

 

“Oh, well, there was many of the people, there were good people, and the Nazis just hijacked it.”

 

So he completely changed his tune. Why did he do that? Because the prime minister of this country fears more the normalisation of National Socialism and our organisation than he does mass dissatisfaction with mass immigration, which is mass dissatisfaction with his leadership.

 

One thing that would unite every single person at that rally would be a hatred of Anthony Albanese, the prime minister.

 

And so for him to say that, completely turns everything everyone was saying on its head because they were all saying:

 

“Well, if you guys show up, they’ll call everyone Nazis!”

 

Well, what happened was the opposite. There was this scrambling by not just conservatives where you might expect it, but by Leftists, even. Mainstream Leftists in the mainstream media to distance the rally from the Nazis. And that was quite something to observe.

 

Secondarily, I would say the response of the conservatives was quite interesting, because a lot of conservatives did not want to touch this rally with a ten foot pole. They were afraid to weigh in, they were afraid to back it.

 

And then after they saw it was a massive success, then they tried to all pretend like they supported it the whole time and defend the rally. We saw Sky News basically defending the rally, Liberal Party politicians defending the rally and so on. And what this showed is that it doesn’t actually matter if the Nazis are involved. It doesn’t actually matter how supposedly “bad” the optics of the rally are.

 

[13:10]

 

At the end of the day, the people are still going to come out and they’re going to march against mass immigration and the system will still have to respond to those concerns as legitimate because of the sheer numbers and quantity. And when we do another one of these, the Nazis will be there again and the turnout will be excellent again. And the people will be glad that we are there. Like they were already glad that we were there. When we marched in Sydney with the boys in formation in Black bloc, the crowd literally gave us an ovation as we marched in the NSN was like applauded by the crowd at the beginning of the rally. There’s vision in Melbourne from the boys getting high fives and cheers and so on as they march into the crowd as well.

 

And a lot of the people that went to the rally in Melbourne saw the violence from the Left and loved to see the fact that there were some men willing to stand up and fight to ensure the rally was successful. There were reports in Melbourne that there were fat bitches on megaphones basically cucking out, saying:

 

“No, the Left have blocked off the rally, we have to turn around and go back.”

 

Well, no one listened to them because the National Socialists were at the front beating through the communists to ensure the rally could get to its destination.

 

And then when Thomas Sewell gave his speech at Parliament to a crowd of tens of thousands of patriots, he justified our presence, saying:

 

“I know not everyone here might be as radical as usual, but you need the fighters at the front and we are the fighters. When the Palestinians and the communists came to try and attack us and take the Aussie flags, it was us who fought through them!”

 

And the crowd erupted into enervation [?]. They absolutely loved it when he said that because they saw it with their own two eyes that that was real.

 

And so it was a massive victory, I think, for the NSN, because what it showed was that when push comes to shove, when the patriots need to mobilise, we will be there to facilitate it. And we facilitated it around the country. We did a lot of work behind the scenes to push Zionists, cuckservatives and so on out of this rally, who wanted to water it down, who wanted to turn it into a civic nationalist rally, who wanted to turn it into:

 

“Oh, we’re not racist, we love everyone, blah blah, blah!”

 

Just deprive it of all of its meaning and all of its direction. And we helped ensure that the rally went ahead as planned. And this is our message to Australian patriots. We’re on your side. We will help as best as we can to facilitate your dissatisfaction with immigration because this is our number one issue. There is nothing we care about more than preserving the White majority in Australia. That is literally priority one of our organisation! And we will do everything in our power to physically, politically and so on, protect patriots who want to stand with us against mass immigration, stand for continuing to have a nation, continuing to have Australia for the Australians.

 

And so I think it was a massive success for our organisation to show as a proof of concept the positive role that we can play and that a lot of the naysayers that their concerns were unfounded. And also it was a great show of force from the Australian people that they are willing to turn out in serious numbers on this issue. And I think it could get bigger from here.

 

I mean, there’s talk of another one soon. I know that it’s going to be redone on Australia Day and that could be the big one! I think the turnout on Australia Day could be quite special. And we need to take back our cities from these Aboriginal communist invasion Day, you know, “Fuck Australia” marches that go on in the middle of our cities every Australia Day. It’s ridiculous!

 

Australian patriots should run our cities and should through an expression of national pride on our national holiday. That should be what Australia’s cities look like on Australia Day is a sea of Aussie flags and patriots celebrating together.

 

But it’s going to probably be a fight. We’re going to need people to turn out in serious numbers to take the cities back, because the official Australia Day parades have all been shut down. And last year on Australia Day in Adelaide, we were all arrested for the crime supposedly of waving Aussie flags and celebrating Australia Day with pride. But this year it’s not going to be 60 or 70 of us. It’s going to be thousands and thousands and thousands of us in every city taking our cities back! And I think that could be glorious and that could be historic because that could be really the day where the tide turns in Australian politics.

 

Blair Cottrell: The march for Australia definitely would have just been Israeli flags and explanations from the speakers about why they’re not racist without the presence of White Australia. Are you guys going by the name White Australia now or are you still NSN? How do you address the organisation?

 

[17:56]

 

Joel Davis: Our organisation’s name is White Australia. The NSN is the activist vanguard of White Australia.

 

So you can go to White Australia.org, you can sign up to be a registered supporter. We’d love for you to sign up as a registered political supporter of White Australia to help us register our political party. And so White Australia is the umbrella organisation. The NSN is specifically the street activism wing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why do you think Melbourne, out of all the march locations, why do you think Melbourne was the most violent?

 

Joel Davis: Well, two reasons. One, Melbourne is by far the largest concentration of communists in Australia. So they had the most communists in the streets.

 

And also Victoria police are the most incompetent police force in Australia by a country mile. Victoria police completely abdicated their responsibility to maintain public order on the day. They allowed communists to set up blockades. They allowed communists to get right up to the march and attack the march. I saw in some of the footage that you put out of your experience on the day in Melbourne that there were confrontations between massive groups of communists and patriots with like literally not a copper in sight.

 

I don’t think New South Wales police, they’re just simply too competent at this stage anyway for that to happen. And I think there’s two reasons for that. One, Victoria police lost all their best guys because they tried to make them take jabs and tried to get them to shoot anti-Covid protesters with rubber bullets. And all their best guys left Victoria police because they refused to be complicit in such a corrupt institution, number one.

 

And number two, they’ve replaced them with Indians and women and people that can’t do anything when it comes to crowd control, anything serious. And second of all, it’s the fact that there’s no permit system in Melbourne because in Melbourne everyone has the right to protest at any time.

 

And so in other states there was a permit that the march for Australia organisers secured that facilitated a particular route that they had the Right to. And the police basically kept counter-protesters away from that area, more or less well, in the other cities from what I’ve heard. I know they did so in Sydney. I didn’t even see counter-protesters in Sydney. I know they were there, I saw footage of them. But, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Have you noticed the function of a counter-protest is essentially illegal? They make it look like it’s not. They say they’re going to occupy your space. If everyone has the right to protest. And how are counter-protests legal? Oh, because you’re protesting a protest, but you’re actually trying to stop somebody else from having their right to protest.

 

So how does that make any sense? And you’re trying to do it with physical intimidation, and where possible, violence, but for some reason it’s still legal. The only aim a counter-protester can have is unethical and potentially violent.

 

So why is it legal? What do you think? Should counter-protesting be illegal?

 

Joel Davis: No, I don’t think it should be illegal. I mean I’ve conducted counter-protests before, such as with the boys, such as the Fuck Off We’re Full rallies, which I thought were excellent!

 

But obviously when it’s like a big march and the police are notified well in advance, there’s going to be thousands and thousands of people that are going to march on this route. There was a police liaison for the Melbourne organisation that informed the police what the route was going to be. And the Left made it very clear what they wanted to do. And what they wanted to do was, … And we had intelligence from inside their camp that they wanted to literally physically block the rally. People like purple pingers, that communist piece of shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: They would have been successful too, if it wasn’t for the presence of Tom and the guys down here in Melbourne.

 

Joel Davis: Absolutely!

 

Blair Cottrell: I didn’t actually personally see any of the fights or clashes between Tom’s guys and the Leftists. But later when I was reviewing footage from other sources, I noticed that the entire march for Australia was Spearheaded by Tom’s group. And it would have been blocked by lines of aggressive communists who had all sorts of weird weapons or using things as weapons, by the way, like cans of fruit. They were throwing eggs at people. They were throwing petrol. One guy got doused with petrol. I saw that on your channel, actually.

 

Long story short, without Tom and the guys down here in Melbourne, I can say the march, it would, it wouldn’t have gone the way it did. It would have probably got stuck somewhere down near Flinders Street and it really would have been difficult to march anywhere. It just would have been a contained event. We never would have got to Parliament House, and the whole thing would have been declared a victory for the communists.

 

So yeah, it was definitely notable that Tom and his guys fought to defend the march and its original purpose.

 

Joel Davis: That’s the thing. The Left modus operandi in Victoria has been to use violence. And this has been true for decades. When the One Nation Party in the late 90s tried to set up branches in Melbourne, the people who came to attend their branch meetings, many of them were elderly women and so on. They were pelted with tinned food, bricks, hit with crowbars, punched in the face, in the back of the head and so on, by masked communist thugs. This also occurred. I know you know this from experience in the Reclaim Australia Days, back in the 2010s. In Melbourne, communists have been using violence to basically stop nationalists from organising for a very long time. They’ve also used it against us when they’ve come down to NSN rallies, such as the Stop Immigration rally that the NSN held at Parliament House in 2023. They threw tinned food, they threw eggs, like all the same shit that they were doing to this they did then! And the police just stood there and allowed them to do it. Didn’t make one arrest! I think only when a Leftist threw a tin at a cop, then he was arrested for it. But like you can throw them carte blanche at nationalists apparently who were then pepper sprayed by police and so on. The police facilitate Left-wing violence against nationalists in Melbourne. They have for decades. This is nothing new. And again on the weekend.

 

Jacinta Allan and the Labor government in Victoria is full of communists!

 

[24:43]

 

Blair Cottrell: Is that right? Do you think the police command are given specific instructions not to bother Leftist counter-protesters too much and to focus on, …

 

Joel Davis: Victorian police are an ideological institution. I know from dealing with them when they rammed their way into my house or dealing with them in the courts with the organisation, defending charges. Different members of the organisation. I have sat in many courtrooms or called into many courtrooms to listen to the proceedings. Victoria police, and this was true again in Tom’s bail hearing. Victoria police justified their actions against us on the basis that our political ideology is “bad” and that the community needs to be protected from nationalists.

 

So Victoria police are a totally captured institution. They fly trans flags, gay flags and so on at the front of their buildings. They are not a politically neutral organisation. And they have an entire department which is basically dedicated to politically policing the nationalist movement.

 

We’ve seen so much footage and so many reports of people who were not in the NSN, people who were just regular patriots, grandmas, grandpas. There was that one bit of footage of this old man getting bashed by like a horde of communists, he was hospitalised with broken ribs. The communists feel that they’re justified to go out there and beat the shit out of patriots simply because they love their country. And the footage is put all over the media, all over the Internet. The police see the footage and they make no arrests. The communists literally have a free pass to be violent!

 

Blair Cottrell: You know why that is, right? Like, you know why? Like, what’s the dogma that’s motivating this? It is that we are White people, all descendants of evil colonial devils! And that’s not just what Leftists think. That is the dogma of the society that we live in. And there’s three different categories. Every society needs its villains. Under Christendom, you had this kind of spiritual effigy of the devil, right? But it’s no longer a fundamentally Christian society. It’s more secular now.

 

So the villain has become a specific race, responsible for all historical woes and suffering. White people! There’s three different categories of villain as well, right? If you’re White, you’re automatically bad, you’re ethnically bad, your ancestors committed all these atrocities, colonialism, war, blah, blah, blah, slavery.

 

But you can atone for your sins and become an honorary member of the diverse system. You can even become part of the nobility if you disavow your own ethnic heritage. If you basically self abnegate:

 

“You hate your own race? Good! You’re in the club! You become an honorary member of the multiculturalism.”

 

But if you start noticing things or calling out the dogma as bullshit, you’re a racist, right? But if you start actually fighting against the system that’s imposing that dogma, you’re a Nazi!

 

So it’s very simplistic ideological subversion, and it’s kind of sick and twisted. But that is literally the society we live in the reason people are throwing cans of fruit at people’s heads on the street, the reason some people, White people, want to kill other White people is because they’ve been exposed to systemic dogma that makes them believe White people are bad, and need to be punished for historical sins, the sins of their ethnic ancestors! And it’s going to continue while this dogma is still being taught in education system, is still part of the administrative society, part of the society that we’re raised in.

 

So until that changes at a fundamental level, you’re going to have not just White people, but everybody else uniting against White people. Why does every society need its villain? Everyone needs to blame someone. No one likes to take responsibility for their own bullshit! Everyone has to blame someone else.

 

And it’s very important for a society’s power structure to have everyone united against the common enemy!

 

And like I said, because we’re not a religious society anymore, we’re secular. The enemy has to be of the material plane. It has to be a specific race. And it’s us! We are the designated villain of society. So it’s going to continue, it’s going to get worse. It’s kind of creepy actually. And I’ll get into this a bit more as I think about it more.

 

But it’s curious, isn’t it? Because even if you’re watching this, if you’re like of the Leftist opinions and you’re watching me explain this to you now, you still won’t get it! You’ll still think I’m just a racist Nazi and I should be killed or put in jail, because you’re that conditioned by the dogma. Realistically, I’m just a person. I’m a person who believes in just telling the truth as I see it, and that’s it. But you’ll never see me that way. Because of my ethnic heritage and because I’m actually critical of the dogma that you’ve come to love so much and trust so much because you’re so smart for learning it at higher education system. Right?

 

You couldn’t possibly be wrong. You couldn’t possibly have been tricked. You’re too smart for that. You’re too clever. That’s what they told you anyway.

 

But yeah, what do you think? I’ve got one more question for you actually. Another question for you. Did you already touch a little bit on the camp sovereignty that Tom and the guys?

 

[30:10]

 

 

Joel Davis: I did a bit, but we can discuss it because obviously a lot of arrests have been made. I believe seven members of the NSN, don’t quote me on that, have been charged. The police indicate more will be charged. So we’ll see how many of the boys cop charges. You know, the media is portraying it as they ran up the hill to beat up innocent Aboriginals that were sitting around.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ll be honest. That’s what it looks like. That’s what it looks like on camera. It looks really bad! It looks like Tom and his guys were the aggressors and they attacked people who weren’t doing anything. They were sitting there. And it’s not really important when you got video evidence like that going before the court, what happened, what was said, rumours, what might have been seen by someone, it’s all hearsay. It only matters what is provable.

 

Basically, what is assessed in court, the way determinations are made in court, as you know, Joel, isn’t the truth! It’s what things look like! It’s what the judge decides is true based on what is provable and the evidence.

 

So do you think, personally, I think if they didn’t attack the camp, I think he probably still would have got charged for a couple of things. But every other fight that I saw taking place between Tom’s guys and the Leftists, they had clear aggressors that were fighting them as well. So they had defense there, they had legal defense. It’s all on camera, and they’ve got defense.

 

If they didn’t attack the camp, I don’t think they’d be copying as much flak. I don’t think Tom would be in jail right now.

 

So do you think it was a tactical error to charge on the camp like that?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I think the benefit of doing so versus the cost is definitely not worth it. I think having Tom in prison for any period of time, but particularly a long period of time, is obviously not in our interests as an organisation. Of course not.

 

However, I was in Sydney. If I was in Melbourne, and I had just been fighting communists all day with the boys. And then I heard reports that these communists were camping, you know, up that hill and beating up patriots, gang bashing patriots on the way back to their car. And we had to go back to our cars, which were covered in graffiti because these patriots went down, identified cars that [belonged to] people that were attending the march and keyed the fuck out of their cars, spray painted “Nazi” all over them and kicked in the windows and shit like that!

 

And then you look up the hill and they’re up the hill and they’re throwing shit down at you and fucking yelling shit out. And it’s those same that you’ve been fighting all day that have been doing heinous things, beating up old people throwing projectiles at you. Some reports of throwing vomit, throwing shit! Throwing piss, like water balloons filled with piss, dousing people with petrol, all kinds of shit you’ve seen and dealt with throughout the day.

 

And then you see those cunts up on that hill, I can understand the impulse entirely to run up the hill and beat the shit out of them. And I probably would have, not probably, I definitely would have done it too! If I was there, I’d probably be in jail right now too. Or maybe I’d be on charges and be released on bail because I don’t have all the priors that Tom had.

 

But yeah, I completely understand why that happened. From a moral standpoint, it was 100% justified. 100% justified!

 

However, from a tactical standpoint, doesn’t look like the best move. But I can’t, you can’t judge. Like if you imagine yourself in the situation that they were in, if you’re a red blooded White man, you would have done the same thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Any man who sees that footage of the boys running up a hill screaming like the last charge of Gondor in Lord of the Rings or something, everyone I showed that to laughed! It’s amusing, it’s funny! It’s like:

 

“Oh my God, this is happening in the city between different political factions. This is crazy!”

 

But as I said, or what I was alluding to, is if you’re going to get strategic, which you need to do in politics, obviously you can’t just be governed entirely by impulse. Like the aggressive general. You need to know when not to fight. You need to know when to fight and when not to fight. And how to fight as well. You’ve got to remember too, that everyone’s got a video camera attached to their hand these days with their smartphones. Everyone’s filming everything all the time. It’s a really gay system we live in. It’s really fucking gay and annoying, but you kind of got to adjust to some degree.

 

Look, half the reason I have been close to the organisation is because I care about Tom. He’s my friend. Everyone knows I love Tom. I’ve got a long history with Tom. And I was trying to guide him best I could. I was, just by giving him advice. I still enjoy commentary, obviously. I enjoy analysis and putting together my videos on politics. But I wanted to try to keep Tom out of prison, because Tom is a no bullshit kind of guy. He’s a fighter, he’s a warrior! I admire him for that. But it was my intent to try to keep him out of jail, to try to make sure something like this didn’t happen. And it looks like I failed to do that. I did my best. But at the end of the day he was going to do whatever he was going to do. I’m just glad that his guys, …

 

Joel Davis: It was awesome! Like the Tom Sewell mythos ultimately just took insane W’s! Like there’s all this footage now of Thomas, so bashing communists and pulling the Bane pose and holding the Aboriginal flag, and yeah, he might do a little bit of time, but he’s going to get out! And when he gets out, we’re going to have the party built. The movement is going to be even more advanced. We’re going to have even bigger membership. A fully fledged political party operating. And his folk hero status was cemented, I think, over the weekend. Like Tom Sewell’s name was trending in America. It was on the news in Canada, it was on the news in Britain.

 

And then the whole epic-ness of the day of the speech to the 20,000, …

 

[36:58]

 

[Joel’s sound cut out for several minutes without him realizing it. When doing these shows they should have a written sign always handy, saying “you’re muted”, or similar, that they can hold up.]

 

[40:15]

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you hear me? Joel? If you can hear me, can you give me a thumbs up?

 

Joel Davis: How long was I gone? Did you lose me for a bit?

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you hear me? Can you hear me? Can you hear what I’m saying?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Test, test, test.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I can hear you. How long was that?

 

Blair Cottrell: I can’t hear what you’re saying.

 

Joel Davis: How long was that?

 

Blair Cottrell: If you can hear me, Thumbs up.

 

Joel Davis: I can hear you.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, you can hear me. Okay, thanks. Well, my audio is just shit itself! I can’t hear what you’re saying. I’ll say this quickly and then I’ll buzz off to try to fix my speaker.

 

Regarding Tom staying in remand and possibly even getting some pretty harsh sentencing when his charges do go to sentencing. There’s a few things to consider here because the judge can actually use what’s called “public denunciation, deterrence or racial motivation or racially motivated”, purposes behind his offences to essentially ignore mitigating factors like his military service, his work ethic, his family, and give him the maximum possible sentence for the charges. Public denunciation is basically, it’s a form of deterrence. It’s like for the public to see:

 

“Look, don’t do what this guy did, or this will happen to you!”

 

And they can do that. The law, if it’s a serious enough matter, they feel it’s a serious enough matter. Deterrence is like, on an individual level for him. Don’t do this again. Or this is what’s going to happen to you where we’re going to give you a harsh sentence. So you learn. And then the racial motivation thing.

 

And like I said, any one of those things can be used to give us especially harsh sentence. So he’s going to need some really good lawyers, he’s going to need some good legal advice and people to do some diligent work for him. Preferably, in my opinion, people who aren’t so emotionally invested necessarily in our side of politics, the right side of politics, or not so ideologically motivated. Just good, cold, logical lawyers that are going to crunch all the numbers and do all the magic.

 

Because what is law, at the end of the day, it’s symbols on paper. It’s words on paper that justify the government kidnapping you and making an example out of you if you’re not doing what they want you to do. But you need people who are good at putting really nice and intelligent words on paper. You need people good with that symbology bullshit to work their magic to try to make sure Tom doesn’t end up in jail for the next five years.

 

But I’m just gonna fix my audio. I can’t hear what you’re saying. I don’t fucking know why I don’t have my usual setup.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: So I’ll be back.

 

[Blair leaves]

 

[42:56]

 

Joel Davis: All right. So Blair’s audio shit itself just as my microphone fucked out. And I was cooking too, though. That’s really annoying. People are texting me saying it was like five minutes, “no audio” or something.

 

And anyway, I’m gonna go from the top. I’ll try and reprise what I was saying. What I was saying was this.

 

Number one, the people that are complaining that:

 

“Maybe Tom maybe made an incorrect strategic decision charging up that hill.”

 

What they’re complaining about is the fact that Thomas Sewell is a real nigger!

 

The reason why we are going to have, why we have the world’s most interesting and dynamic far-Right movement, while we have the most relevant Nazis in the 21st century in Australia, is because Tom Sewell doesn’t do what’s pragmatic. Tom Sewell lives, eats, breathes and shits blood and honour! And that’s why people love him! That’s why he is able to lead a movement that is as cool and dynamic and powerful as the one that we have.

 

So you can’t have your cake and eat it too. You can’t, on the one hand, be celebrating all of the excellent things that Tom does or the NSN does or White Australia does. And then on the other hand, be like:

 

“But, well, actually this was the incorrect strategic decision.”

 

It was the honourable decision. It was the moral decision.

 

[44:32]

 

 

And at the end of the day, the mythos of Thomas Sewell took a huge W! [win] What is Tom Sewell’s rap sheet going to be? Bashing a black security guard at Channel Nine! Bashing communists! Bashing Aboriginal activists! This is fucking awesome! If you’re going to have a rap sheet, if you’re going to go to jail, doing awesome shit! And he’s going to get out of jail. Maybe it’ll be one year, maybe it’ll be two years in the worst case scenario. But he’s going to get out of jail and we will have the political party built, we will keep recruiting, the movement will be bigger, be stronger, it’ll have more manpower. And he has solidified his status as a folk hero of Australia and as one of, if not the most leading voices in the struggle for White survival on the planet!

 

Thomas Sewell was trending in America. He was on the news in Canada! Like this is a truly global story. And the whole narrative arc of him and the boys beating their way through communists and then giving an epic speech at the front of Parliament to 20,000 patriots. And then the next day he like runs into Jacinta Allan [Victorian State Premier] and like hijacks a press conference and so on. I mean, it was incredible stuff! It was absolute cinema! The entire country was glued to this story, this incredible story!

 

So yeah, this is like the stuff of folklore, this is the stuff of legend. And this is the type of leader that we should have in this country. We should have an actual warrior, someone who beats the shit out of communists. We shouldn’t have a faggot like Anthony Albanese or Sussan Ley in a pantsuit, pushing just like cliches around!

 

We want a real red blooded human being. The way that he portrayed himself, the way that he conducted himself. That is what a leader is supposed to be that is a warrior! The king is supposed to be a warrior. The king is not supposed to be a corrupt nerd who sells his arse and his values for a cheque. A pragmatic:

 

“Well, I got to do this to keep this person happy and shake hands with this person.”

 

And that’s not the kind of leader that I want. I want a leader who puts their heart on their sleeves and who lives and dies for what they believe. A fighter for this country. That’s who should be leading.

 

So the mythos of Thomas Sewell just took an incredible W, [win] and the whole arc of going to jail and so on. Hitler went to jail, so many other political leaders went to jail, came out of it, and still had political success. Many of the Bolshevik Revolutionaries did time in jail, did time in exile. So many great leaders throughout history were exiled or jailed or what have you. That isn’t going to stop him, and it isn’t going to stop us. So what Tom made was a decision that was based in honour.

 

And in my experience, even if it doesn’t seem pragmatic, ultimately, the honourable decision always will end up being vindicated in time. Because that’s what the Aryan race is! What Aryan means is literally the honourable race. Like the root “arya” means honourable. It means noble. We are the noble race.

 

So that’s how we should behave. We take the fight to the enemy.

 

So, yeah, that’s kind of what you see a lot of naysayers as well, about this whole thing:

 

“Oh, well, you know what’s the point of marching around?”

 

That march completely changed the collective psyche of Australia. That march completely changed the global perception of Australia. It made people believe that nationalism could re-emerge in Australia as a political force. It made people believe that White Australians are not going to surrender this country without a fight. That is intangible. Right? You can’t quantify that you can’t get an Excel spreadsheet that represents exactly how that translates into, like, political metrics. Right?

 

But you know it! If you’re an Australian, you know it, you can feel it. You just experienced it. It felt like a reset of Australian politics.

 

I see Blair is back. Can you hear me this time?

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you hear me?

 

Joel Davis: I can hear you. Can you hear me?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. I think we’re back on. Really sorry about this, guys. I get really frustrated when we can’t just make basic technology work properly. It makes us look like idiots. [chuckling] What was I going to say? What were you saying just then? Do you need to finish a point?

 

Joel Davis: Well, we can move on to the next point. You missed my whole take on the Sewell situation, but it doesn’t. We’re going to keep the stream rolling. I’m not going to repeat it again. I said it once without the audio on. Again without you. So we won’t go over it again.

 

We should move to the next subject, which I wanted to cover, which was that people say:

 

“What’s the point of marching in the street? What’s the big deal? Okay? You had people marching all over Australia. Who cares?”

 

And what I was saying was that politics, you can’t always capture it all in a quantifiable metric. That what that march communicated to the Australian people was that this country is not being given up without a fight, that nationalism is still a force in Australian society. And that the idea that we’re just going to have this slow march into more and more Leftism and more and more multiculturalism. There’s nothing you can do about it. That march was a signal and a shot into the collective psyche that no, actually there is a choice, actually there could be a resistance and emboldens people to have a fighting spirit.

 

It emboldens people to embrace a more nationalist set of values and ideals and in their lives because they can see that they’re not alone. A lot of people don’t even allow themselves to think nationalist thoughts or think racist thoughts because they think that the conversation’s over and that it’s a lost cause. And what a march like that communicates to them in their hind brain in the kind of psycho-social dynamic of Australia, is that:

 

“No! It’s not a lost cause!”

 

Do you agree with that?

 

[51:10]

 

Blair Cottrell: I do, but there needs to be somewhere for them to go. You can’t just march in the street perpetually and not have an actual tangible solution. I know that you guys want to register a political party, but that needs to happen and it needs to happen really soon! Especially because of the situation in Australia. I’ll explain what I mean in a moment. But you guys need some basic legal protections and I think you’ll get that if you get registered as a party. They’re going to try to stop you from registering though, because I think they’ve got like AI models and experts and stuff that try to run certain scenarios through a point of assessment or series of assessments to determine how likely it is that a White Australia party could get votes.

 

And I think they know that it would get votes. And they’re going to try to shut you down. And it’s creepy what’s happening in Australia right now! It’s almost not safe for dissidents to live in this country at the moment. And it’s only going to get worse over the next one to two years, the next couple of years in Australia for leading dissidents who are trying to create organisation and solutions, somewhere for people to go, someone for people to vote for. It’s a dangerous place to live if you’re someone like that, for three reasons.

 

The first reason is because you remember the Welcome to Country ceremony at the Anzac Day memorial service or the Shrine of Remembrance in Melbourne, where some people booed that they voiced their protest against that. Now that’s a political statement. When a guy is performing the Aboriginal Welcome to Country, he’s doing that for political reasons. It’s a social political statement.

 

Now people in the crowd voiced their disagreement with that some of them were members of NSN or White Australia, and some other people joined in too. And even former soldiers actually understood why the Aboriginal thing was booed. But at least one person has just been charged with three criminal offences for booing! For voicing his disagreement just by booing of a government sponsored political statement at an Anzac Day War Memorial service. He’s been charged with three criminal offences.

 

Joel Davis: Nanthan Bull.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yes! That means he was charged for voicing his opinion, basically.

 

The second creepy thing that makes living in Australia really kind of weird and creepy right now is people are being raided on no evidence. Dozens of Australian Federal police joined by Counter Terrorism police, I think they are. They’re raiding people on no evidence for things they know those people haven’t done just to take their stuff!

 

I know because they did it to me just two months ago. Still haven’t got my stuff back. They reckon I did a Nazi salute. They know I didn’t do a Nazi salute! They know that I don’t do Nazi salutes! I don’t really go for the whole German, the copy paste German, National Socialism thing. It’s not my style, never has been. And they know that they would have intelligence on that, but they just raided me on the accusation anyway and they didn’t have any evidence! And this is creepy because there’s only one. Ics of you’re going to raid people on no evidence for what you know they didn’t do, that’s only one step away from just fabricating evidence, from just making shit up to throwing them in jail or ruin their life!

 

[Blair’s image frozen]

 

Joel Davis: Is he frozen for you guys too, or just me? Chat? Is Blair frozen? Put a F for frozen in the chat, if Blair’s frozen. Yep.

 

All right, it’s over. Well, I’ll interrupt Blair’s black pill rant. Yeah, I think ZOG had enough of the black pilling. I see the chat is full of F’s. We’ll see if he comes back. Hopefully he’ll be back soon.

 

But yeah, I think I take a different view. Like, yes, they’re trying to lay charges on us for speech crimes and things like this, but these are all very minor charges. They don’t carry serious sentences or they have limited prospects of success in court, they de-legitimize the system and create sympathy for our guys and for our movement. And this really shouldn’t deter people from getting involved in the movement.

 

Number one, they generally target people in leadership, prominent public facing activists. And number two, what’s the alternative to joining a movement like ours? Like just standing by and watch our country be stolen, be flooded with Indians and Chinese? Where it’s an irrevocable situation where we completely lose control of the continent forever. Fuck that! I’ve already made my peace with the fact that at some point, if we have enough success as a party, eventually someone might just come shoot me in the head! I don’t give a fuck! I’ll just respawn! Like I don’t care! Because what’s the alternative? I’m not just gonna just sit there like a cuck watching goy flicks and jerking my shit while Indians and niggers and fucking Muslims and shit are flooded into the country and there’s no Australia anymore, and it’s over. Fuck that. I’m not gonna stand by and allow that to happen, as you can all clearly see, and neither should you!

 

[56:47]

 

And if you would, fuck you! Like, you’re literally the reason why the White race is in decline, because of your refusal to engage in collective political action in defense of our race. And it’s not even that bad. Like I’m having a lot of fun being a political dissident. A lot of my friends are National Socialist or nationalist political dissidents. They’re having a good time! It’s actually a fun way to live. Like, I’m so sick of black pilling and:

 

“Oh, but this, but that and whatever!”

 

Who fucking cares! You know what? Non-Whites are flooding into the country by the hundreds of thousands! And now is the time to resist! Now is the time to get organised. Here is the movement. We are at the beginning phase of the movement to fight back, to take our country back. Where the fuck are you? Why the fuck haven’t you joined yet? There is literally zero excuses. We must fight or we will perish as a nation! Period!

 

I don’t care about the black pills. I really don’t. I don’t care about the, “but what?” It’s just pathetic! We don’t have time for that. What we need to focus on is how are we going to get more organised. How are we going to build up the collective resistance of the White Australian nation to resist our genocide! That’s what we need to focus upon and that’s all that matters.

 

And you know what? I remember discussing this on the show before. There is over one million White millionaires in Australia. There is more than 1 million White millionaires. I know a million dollars isn’t really, that much money anymore. But the point that I’m making is that there is plenty of resources out there in the White community. There is almost, 20 million White men and women in this country. Yes. Some of them are Lefties, and some of them are Boomers. Whatever. I mean, Boomers can still help. Boomers can still vote. Boomers have a lot of money that they can throw in. There’s a place for Boomers.

 

But a lot of them might be lost causes ideologically or what have you, but there are millions and millions of people that are going to be positively predisposed to White nationalism in this country, that if we organise just even a small percentage of them, we could build a political movement that could rival every other political movement in this country and then some. So we can win! It’s just a matter of willpower and a willingness to struggle and a willingness to sacrifice.

 

You know that I see Blair’s back. There was a gentleman in our organisation who is a dentist, who earns very good money as a dentist, he’s a friend of mine who was doxed by the enemy, by jewish journalists, and by Antifa. And they’re going about trying to destroy his career right now.

 

And, I mean, obviously that’s a setback for him on a personal level, but he doesn’t care, because he understands, like, ultimately he doesn’t care if that’s the sacrifice he has to make, because ultimately, saving our nation is what matters! And there’s plenty of people in our movement who have made incredible sacrifices, who have been attacked, who have had to go through trials and tribulations, have been incarcerated, have been charged and will do time in prison and so on. That’s the only way that we’re going to fucking win!

 

We’re actually not going to be capable of winning with a strategy which takes no risks, in which no one has to make any sacrifices, in which no one has to do any time in prison, no one has to pay any money, no one has to lose a job, no one has to lose a girlfriend, no one has to be estranged from their family. That’s not the story! That’s not the hero arc. The hero arc is trials and tribulation!

 

[Joel’s sound cut out]

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel, is your. Is that your microphone or mine? I suddenly just can’t hear you anymore.

 

Joel Davis: Am I back?

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re back now? Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Was it for long? Was it a short mute this time?

 

Blair Cottrell: I was like, 10 minutes, bro! You have to start again! No, I’m kidding! It was only, like, 10 seconds.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. What I was saying was that that’s the hero’s journey. The hero’s journey. You have to go through trials and tribulations. You have to suffer! You have to make sacrifices in order to develop the character, to become worthy of being the champion, of being the victim, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I agree.

 

Joel Davis: We’re all on the hero’s journey together. Everyone participating in this movement, we all must suffer. All my sacrifice! And we all must accept it valiantly and forthrightly.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I get it, but., …

 

Joel Davis: No one is making more sacrifices than the leadership. We got Tom willing to go to prison for the movement, and go to prison gladly. I mean, obviously not glad to be in prison, but he’s willing to do that if that’s what’s necessary, because there is going to be no victory without casualties. There’s going to be no victory without suffering, no victory without struggle.

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel, is it necessary? Was it necessary? That’s my question.

 

Sure, it’s like what you’re saying, I understand it. But at the same time, you don’t want to hand yourself over on a platter to the police prosecution and make it easy for them. So was it necessary for Tom to go to jail after this march? Was it necessary to attack the camp? I don’t think it was at this point.

 

[1:02:12]

 

 

Joel Davis: Well, attack I don’t see it as an attack. I see it as them defending themselves against communist agitators who were throwing projectiles at them and threatening them.

 

But nevertheless, whether it was necessary or not, is besides the point. What it was honourable, and what it was awesome! And it should be defended on that basis.

 

And moreover, it adds to, as I was saying before, the mythos of Thomas Sewell. The man, the myth, the legend, the folklore! I mean, it’s legendary stuff. This will go down in the history books on the arc of the rise and fall of Tom Sewell, the ups and downs and so on will be the fights with the communists and the street brawls and so on, which help demonstrate his authenticity to the fighters of Australia. This man is a fighter! This man takes the fight to the enemy on your behalf. Follow him! That’s powerful!

 

What are these faggots in the Liberal Party? Who are they fighting? No one! They’re just a bunch of cucks. Or in the One Nation Party:

 

“Hey, look at this piece of shit in the suit who says 20% of things that you might like sometimes. Follow them!”

 

No, that’s not inspiring! They’re not taking the fight to anyone. You know, when you see:

 

“Oh, Avi, Yemeni is doing a fundraiser because he’s doing videos on the street, and we’ve got to raise money for Avi!”

 

Like, this is not a hero. He doesn’t have anything heroic about him. There’s nothing heroic about Pauline Hanson. There’s nothing heroic about Alex Antic. There’s something heroic about any of these fucking losers! There is something heroic about Thomas Sewell. And he wouldn’t be heroic if he wasn’t also honourable. He wouldn’t be what he is if he didn’t sometimes make the incorrect tactical decision and do the based option.

 

So I think ultimately it’s going to work out for the best because when he gets out of prison, we’re going to have the party built up. The folklore will be in place. It’s a time for others to step up. You know, Jacob Hersant has to step up. I’ve got to step up. Jack Altis has got to step up.

 

The other state leaders have got to step up. Everyone’s got to step up to ensure that we execute on our plan, which has been set in place. We know what we want to do, what we want to achieve. And I have full confidence that we can achieve it while he’s in prison, so that when he gets out, the movement is in a stronger and better place. So, I’m still feeling positive.

 

I mean, I’m really pissed off that, I mean, you mentioned Tom is not just like a guy to you. He’s a close personal friend. Me, too. He’s one of my best friends. I hate the fact that he’s in a concrete box right now. I hate the fact that he can’t spend time with his kids, he can’t spend time with the boys. That he’s being degraded as a human being by being treated as a prisoner when he did nothing wrong. What he did was moral. Fuck those putrid communist faggots! They deserve worse than what was done to them.

 

And so I feel angry about that. I feel angry about the fact that they’re denying him books, that they’re denying him pen and paper so he can have more productive time in there. I feel a lot better when he’s at least able to read and write and things, things like that. He could get some product productivity out of his time in there. Hopefully that will be rectified soon. But I’ve got a lot of things that I’m angry about, and I hate not being able to hang out with him. He’s one of my best friends.

 

But at the end of the day, I back it. I backed the decision that he made because it was epic! Like him beating up the communists and so on was epic! It was fucking awesome!

 

And ultimately when people look back upon, upon things in the future, if we all do our jobs correctly and we keep advancing the movement, it’ll just become this awesome myth that will end up animating the movement for the better.

 

Blair Cottrell: They definitely won, Tom and the boys, they won every fight. Goodness me! The counter-protesters, they obviously don’t train for that kind of thing enough and maybe Tom’s guys do and that was the difference. There’s maybe a difference in physical health standards as well.

 

But yeah, I had a comment to make on that and now it slipped my mind. It’s really hot tonight. It’s been freezing cold in Melbourne and now all of a sudden it’s really hot! But there’s a storm outside. Have you noticed how hot it is today? I can’t relax because it’s too hot.

 

Joel Davis: It was a warm day up here in Sydney, but I don’t know, it’s a different climate. It’s nice though. I enjoyed it. Good weather.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, Joel’s the dealer in hope, isn’t he guys? Yeah. Joel always ooks at the glass half full. And Joel always has a positive spin to throw on things, which is good. You need people like that.

 

Joel Davis: It’s not just positive spin though. It’s like it’s confidence in what we’re doing. I believe in the power of, … Like that video of the boys bashing Antifa which everyone must have seen. That video has got 10 million views! That video is fucking legendary! Of the NSN taking the streets back from the communist scum! These commies have literally been running the streets of Melbourne on a political basis for decades. They’ve never had their arse handed to them like that in decades! They have been shutting down nationalism, shutting down everything that they don’t like basically.

 

And then they do rallies every other week about their bullshit causes. They think they own the place. And the boys that go down there and send one into the nose of these race traitor pieces of shit, because a lot of them are White race traitors, pathetic little cucks, was fucking awesome! And that is going to inspire the entire global pro-White movement and it’s going to inspire the fighters in Australia to come and join us, so that the movement grows larger.

 

And so the next time we do the street, a street rally and the next time and the next time we’re stronger and stronger and stronger so we can exert our will on the streets, which is what is politics fundamentally. It’s fundamentally about controlling territory. That’s the essence of politics. And in order to get sick cunts, to get hard cunts, to get fighters to join you have to prove that you’re a fighter. Fighters are only going to follow other fighters!

 

[1:08:56]

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, the Leftist activists. I think there’s a new generation coming through of Leftist activists as. Well, I mean, a lot of the guys in Tom’s group are part of a new generation of nationalists. So there’s obviously going to be younger and more aggressive communist activists at the same time who are being indoctrinated, who are being exposed to probably more aggressive conditioning than the generation that came before them as well. So everything’s becoming more radical as a result of that.

 

But there used to be basic boundaries and things that Leftist activists wouldn’t do. Those boundaries no longer seem to exist. They’ve been up to all sorts of mischief and just like relentless personal attacks on anyone that they can find, any information they can find on anyone at the rally. And they’re being assisted by major media journalists and government bureaucrats, as always. But it still doesn’t seem strange to them that maybe there are not on the right side.

 

But what I was saying before I got cut off is I’m concerned about the next couple of years for organisers on the right side of centre, if you want to use the political spectrum as a gauge, I don’t usually go for it, but it makes sense to you.

 

Use it in this for this explanation. I’m concerned because, first of all, as I summarized, someone’s been charged for “booing”. Someone’s been charged with three criminal offences for booing people all across the country. Only people who are nationalists or ethnic nationalists are being raided on no evidence and are having their stuff taken. Okay. And as I said, that’s very close to just making stuff up for the police. They’re not playing by the rules anymore. Usually if police are going to raid you for hours and take your stuff and hold it indefinitely, they need to have good evidence that you’ve done something criminal. And they usually only take things relevant to that offence.

 

Now it’s just take all your stuff! Take all your stuff and hold it as long as they want. And they’re doing it for things they know you haven’t done. And without evidence to back up any of it. Right. Very close to just fabricating or making up evidence to throw you away, if that’s what they’re going to do. Creepy shit!

 

And the third thing is Tom’s bail hearing, actually. The prosecutor, the police prosecutor, took the opportunity to add into the submission for why Tom should be remanded in custody. That means not given bail. He said that Tom had made hateful comments on the steps of Parliament, hateful comments about immigration.

 

All right, that’s notable because Tom has been accused of all sorts of violent offences. But then he also slotted the hateful comments remark in there in kind of like a “violent offence sandwich”. You know, you got violent offence, hateful comments, violent offence. And he fed that to the judge and the judge gobbled it up. She swallowed it down! Because after she ate that and made her decision, she said:

 

“People have the right not to be confronted by hatred, or hateful comments.”

 

Okay, so now it’s on record, legally, and the law works on precedent. It’s on record that an activist has been remanded in custody, refused bail. Yes, because he’s been accused of violent offences, but also because he made “hateful comments”. You see, what they’re trying to do here is they’re trying to take “hate speech” or “hateful comments” and they’re trying to elevate the severity of that crime to be similar or even akin to violent crime. So hate speech is going to become like violence in the eyes of the law, and you’ll be sentenced accordingly. Right.

 

So people being charged with criminal offences for booing. What is booing? It’s just voicing their disagreement with political statements. You’re getting charged for that. Raided on no evidence, which can easily lead to just fabricating evidence and hate speech crime possibly being punished as though it’s violence or having the same impact on society as violence. And this is not happening in 10 years. This is not happening for your kids, so you don’t have to worry about it. It’s happening here right now in Australia! It’s hectic, it’s creepy, but that’s our reality.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, that’s true, but we’ll see how that goes in court. Ultimately, like Nathan’s case, I think it has limited prospects of success. We will be going to the High Court because they’re unconstitutional laws, they’re untested laws, untested interpretations that don’t have precedent in Australian law.

 

And so again, there’s a serious legal fight. It isn’t something to just like give up upon:

 

“Oh, well, free speech is gone!”

 

There’s a lot of support for free speech in Australia. It’s the majority of the population and there’s a strong constitutional basis for free speech, at least political speech in this country.

 

[1:13:44]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: There is, but I’m concerned that Australia is becoming so viciously corrupt that the law is just boiling down to who has more resources, who has more influence. And whoever has more influence, which is always going to be the police prosecutor. They work for the government, they’re going to get the result they want. I’m concerned that that’s the situation right now in Australia. I mean, when has any nationalist had any sort of victory in the courts? Can you think of a single example?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, there are examples. I mean, we just had a pretty huge victory where they dropped like pretty much all of our charges in Adelaide. And now we’ve got them on the back foot. And now Stephen Wells is going to be extracting hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages out of South Australia police, if not millions.

 

So there are victories. There’s also a guy who. This is how robust the Constitution is in legal history. There was a guy, this is going back now maybe 10 plus years. And of course I don’t condone this, but it was a Nazi YouTuber, let’s say, but I think he was on YouTube, it was on a different website, who made a video more or less advocating to do a Holocaust, but for real in Australia. He was then charged with inciting violence. He successfully argued in court that, well, he was advocating for political policy. He wasn’t saying that he personally was going to go and build gas chambers and start gassing jews, but that he thinks the government should do it. Ideally in a representative democracy we should be able to elect a leadership on a pro-Holocaust platform or something. And he won the case!

 

So there are cases like this in Australian history. There is a very robust, as I said, constitutional protection for political speech. So there is precedent for victories on that front.

 

Now we’re entering into unprecedented territory with the recent cases that have been brought against members of the organisation. And so it hasn’t been tested properly. Nothing has gone past like the magistrate court level really. We’ve seen Jacob’s case going to the county court for the Roman salute in November. That’ll be interesting. But ultimately this stuff is going to end up in the High Court, more likely.

 

So we’re gonna have to wait and see before we ride it off like it’s Just completely. You can be sceptical that we can win, but I think it’s silly to just write it off when we haven’t even like properly fought, …

 

Blair Cottrell: No, no, that’s not what I’m doing. I’m not black pilling! I’m just looking at the situation objectively.

 

But what I wanted to end on was I think we should be, regardless of what happens, as dissidents, as nationalists, regardless of what they say, what they come up with, what they do to you, you have to keep your chin up and just keep moving forward. Like, you can’t let them break, you can’t let them turn us on each other. You know, don’t be compelled to flip. Don’t think you can go back to quote, unquote, “normal life”, because once you’ve crossed over the threshold, you realise there is no normal life. There’s just a war, an eternal battle for our collective ethnic existence. And we’re in a constant battle with people who don’t want us to exist anymore. Right?

 

That is the truth! So keep your chin up and keep moving forward. But be prepared for things to get really spicy in the next couple of years because As I said, the government, the police, they’re not really playing by the rules right now, not when it comes to Tom’s group specifically. They’re really going hard.

 

Joel Davis: The police definitely aren’t playing by the rules, and lower courts are garbage! Like this woman magistrate. I’ve sat in courtrooms where the magistrate has said things like:

 

“I’m not really in the mood to hear arguments today and statements of this nature.”

 

Female magistrates constantly talking about constantly making the phrase “I feel” in court. What do you mean “you feel”? You’re a magistrate, you’re there to like adjudicate over rational arguments and evidence.

 

So the magistrate’s court is a joke! It’s like it’s no surprise that we get garbage judgements in the Magistrates Court. But there are many levels of court higher than the Magistrates Court. And the higher up you go, the more rational and sensible the whole process gets.

 

So before we exhaust our legal options in higher courts, we should remain confident in victory, and we have a strong legal argument, like I said. Now in this case where where in terms of the so-called assaults or violent disorder on these communists at the so-called Camp Sovereignty, that is a different case that you can’t defend, obviously on the grounds of free speech because it was a physical interaction.

 

But in terms of these speech cases, I feel very confident that we can be successful in court. And even if you’re found guilty of a lot of these things, there’s actually no jail sentence.

 

Blair himself was found guilty of a speech crime years ago and it was a six thousand dollar fine. So it’s not that big of a fucking deal! Like, okay, it sucks to get fined $6,000 but it’s not going to be the end of your life. Right? It’s six grand.

 

So there needs to be a certain amount of a reality check that other than Tom, none of us are in jail right now. We’ve been doing this for years. So clearly the system doesn’t have a super efficient means of putting us away. Yes, they’re passing new laws and they have passed new laws and they’re trying to increase their powers and so on. It’s going to get more difficult.

 

[1:19:32]

 

But also our tactics will adapt to the new laws in kind. We’re not stupid. We know how to read the laws, we know how to study the laws, and we will persevere.

 

There’s a few other things that I wanted to cover. I don’t know what’s going on with Blair, if he’s coming back or if he’s gone. But one of them is there’s two bits of, … There’s a lot of criticism and said online, people calling us Feds and blah, blah, blah. And that’s just silly. Like if we were Feds, why do they just put our leader in jail? You know, if we’re Feds, why would the Prime Minister defend an anti-immigration rally of people who hate him and his government’s policies from the association with Nazis? The idea is:

 

“Oh, the Labor government sends in the Nazi Feds so that everyone at the rally gets called Nazis!”

 

Well, that actually didn’t even happen. In fact, the Prime Minister said the opposite.

 

So the Fed accusations are just ridiculous! There’s zero evidence supporting them. The logic, when people accuse us of being Feds, their logic is either based in falsehoods or their predictions never come true. It’s just garbage!

 

But what I wanted to discuss with two other bits of criticism or analysis. One, statements from various people, including Dave Right Now who gave a speech in Sydney and Stuart Bonds from the One Nation Party who gave a speech in Sydney. These people were saying that National Socialism and communism, these are the same thing as one another. I challenged both of these gentlemen to a debate on the subject. If they really believe this, they should be willing to sit down and debate me on the subject. We can have a neutral host that’ll make sure that it’s fair and so on. I’m not interested in getting into some kind of insult match with these people, but to have a sincere, gentlemanly, scholarly debate on the subject.

 

You know, Stuart Bonds is a he almost got elected up in the Hunter region for the One Nation Party. I think he was the most successful One Nation candidate. He was the most successful One Nation candidate in the lower house at the last election. He got the largest share of the vote in the lower house. He didn’t get elected, but he gave it a crack. He came close. So he’s a serious player in politics, let’s say, like one day he probably will end up in Parliament. So if he wants to call us communists, I take offence at that. It was our boys literally bashing through lines of communists to ensure that the rally was successful in Melbourne. No one hates us more than communists.

 

This idea that we’re somehow the same as communists, just racist or something, is ridiculous! Fundamentally, communists, historically. What was the opposition movement in Europe when communists threatened to take over Europe? It was the National Socialists and the fascists that fought the biggest war in human history to prevent communists from taking over Europe. Why did Hitler get elected in Germany? Why did the people support Mussolini? Why were fascist governments popping up all throughout Central Europe and beyond, Spain, Eastern Europe? Why? Because the people feared the rise of communism and they turned to the fascists to stop communists. Fascism is the antidote to communism! Fascism is the break glass option when the communists start taking over. That’s what motivated the people of Europe to get behind National Socialism and fascism, was the rise of communism.

 

So this idea that we’re all the same is just insane! It’s ridiculous! These movements are bitter enemies! Why are they bitter enemies? Because they fundamentally have a totally opposite view of human nature. Communists, they deny the reality of race. They view basically all men as being created equal. And they see all inequality between peoples, whether they be groups or individuals, as the product of artificial forms of exploitation created by structures of power within society. And they therefore want to tear down those structures of power and engage in their revolutionary activity to destroy society. Because basically any kind of function within society which ensures a distinction of quality, that people who contribute more are rewarded more than people who contribute less, that people who have more to offer are given more access than people who have less to offer, and so on.

 

Any kind of quality control within society they view as immoral, they view as something that needs to be destroyed, and therefore they want to destroy quality. Equality is the opposite of quality, should be called a-quality because equality is basically a prohibition on qualitative judgements between human beings being socially enforced in any kind of way. That’s what communists believe in.

 

What National Socialists believe in. National Socialists don’t just believe in the value of race and wanting to defend our race. Obviously that’s an integral. But National Socialists believe in hierarchy. National Socialists defended private property against Communists in the Weimar Republic. National Socialists defended hierarchical structures and supported the creation through the SS of a new aristocracy in Europe, supported eugenic breeding practices, supported a whole series of social reforms that would elevate the good blood, elevate people of quality into positions of power and esteem and status. It was about breeding up the race and therefore elevating society according to aristocratic principles.

 

So it’s a totally antithetical ideology, which is why communists allied with liberals against National Socialists and why to this day the communists ally with the forces of liberalism, the forces of capitalism against us!

 

[1:26:47]

 

So why would they be sitting on the far-Left and us on the far-Right if we had the same views? It’s a fundamentally insane position. So I challenge Stuart to a debate. Let’s set it up. There’s people I’ve spoken to behind the scenes that would be interested in potentially hosting it who don’t endorse fundamentally what I believe, but would think that it would be interesting. I think it would do views. I think NSN versus One Nation, the debate would be fun. He seems like a good sport.

 

If you want to talk shit online, back it up! Debate me! If you really believe that National Socialists are just like racist communists, let’s debate the subject or retract the statement if you’re not willing to actually back it up in a debate.

 

The other thing that I would like to address, I guess, is this “hijack narrative”, this view that:

 

“Oh, the NSN came in and just hijacked the March for Australia!”

 

No, we participated. We didn’t hijack. We worked with the other people in the march, and we were welcome in the march, as I said. We were literally given an ovation by the other rally goals when we showed up in Sydney. In Melbourne, we basically ran the whole thing and made the whole thing possible. We were helping and facilitating the march. And we had a core objective which we stated publicly before the march, which was to prevent, you know, establishment conservative, Zionist and other foreign forces from subverting the march and watering down its message. And I think we more or less executed on those objectives.

 

So if you’re happy with how nationalist the march was, with how pure its message was and so on, there’s other people to thank. But you should be also thanking us. We help to contribute to that eventuality, and we will help in future March for Australia events in a similar way.

 

And I think we earned it. No one else literally fought their way through hordes of communists to facilitate the March for Australia except the NSN.

 

So it’s like credit where credit’s fucking due! We got guys that are doing time now over facilitating that march.

 

Yeah, let’s just do some Superchats I guess and end the stream because I think Blair is off. White Triple Six said:

 

“Sending well wishes from Minnesota. Free Thomas Sewell!”

 

Yes, Free Thomas Sewell. I Was Made Up gifted subscriptions. Why are you gifting me subscriptions? Just send a Superchat. It’s kind of weird! What am I going to do with subscriptions? Joey JoJo12345 said:

 

“If you haven’t joined the NSN or at least given money, are you even White?”

 

Good point. Support the org. Evon626 said:

 

“There should be a call to a rally that says if you marched in Melbourne and you were not attacked, it is because of Tom Sewell preventing it.”

 

Well, I mean I think that was made clear that the boys secured the position in Melbourne very effectively. The footage makes that blatantly clear and eyewitness accounts of the day makes that blatantly clear.

 

Now there’s a lot of talk about this rally on in September 13, which is a cuck rally basically, which is a lot of the elements that were pushed out of August 31st who wanted to water August 31st down and cuck it out, or who counter signaled August 31st for being staunchly nationalist in its messaging. They consolidated to organise the September 13 March, which is a cringe display like the poster. It’s not the same thing.

 

A lot of people think incorrectly that it’s the same thing as the March for Australia or like some kind of continuity from the March for Australia. No one involved in the March for Australia is going to be involved in this rally.

 

And I would say to patriots stay home! Fuck this rally! Boycott this rally! Now okay, it’s got some all right issues here, but it’s like “Australia unites against government corruption”. This is the poster. Like this is vague! A rally against mass immigration, it’s a very controversial, spicy existential issue, one single issue obviously paired with the notion of Australian identity. But that’s what makes mass immigration an issue. It wasn’t just a rally about the housing crisis caused by mass immigration or economic consequences of mass immigration, but specifically, obviously mass immigration has economic consequences, but specifically the fact that mass immigration is destroying our national identity. And it was the assertion of our national identity and the defense of our national identity that animated Aug. 31, and will animate future March for Australia events and rallies and so on.

 

This is what conservatives always do. “Social media, ban digital ID”. Like they’re just like slapping together “Reform immigration policies”. Like what does that even mean? They slap together a whole series of vague issues and you think:

 

“Oh well I agree on those issues, I guess that’s a good thing.”

 

But then what is the meaning of this march going to be? This march is not going to police foreign flags. You’re going to see foreign flags, you’re going to see abo flags everywhere. It’s not going to be a sea of White Aussies with Aussie flags. It’s going to be a shit show, a admixture of all these different garbage side quest groups or watered down ideological groups. There’s even people that are marching explicitly against racism, against Nazism, in defense of Aboriginal sovereignty and all this shit! It’s like this hodgepodge of disparate groups. There’s no fundamental meaning or purpose to any of this. It was slapped together simply because August 31st was happening. They were salty that they couldn’t ruin it. And so now they’ve got to do their own cuck event.

 

[1:32:15]

 

 

And they’ll bring out a bunch of politicians and cuckservative speakers and so on onto the stage. They won’t get the turnout like last time. It won’t be interesting. It won’t count for anything. Don’t go! Fuck this bd! And if Antifa show up and bash everyone there in Melbourne, in the other cities it’s relatively safe. But if they ever show up in Melbourne and beat up everyone there, the NSN would be there to protect you. Good luck! Sorry to say, like if there’s grandmas or whatever, we love our grandmas that are misguided, but don’t let your grandma go to this.

 

Don’t let people go to this is garbage much for Australia. Will do another rally soon. They’re in talks, from what I’ve heard discussion of maybe a late October rally. But I don’t know for sure. I guess we’ll find out. Wait for that. Proper patriot anti-immigration rally and focus on building momentum up for Australia Day and having big march, anti-immigration marches, seas of Aussie flags. That’s what we want. The rationale here is like:

 

“Well, if we water it down, we’ll get more of a turnout.”

 

I think they’ll get less of a turnout. That’s why you should stay home and tell everyone you know to stay home and not go to this. Because I want the proof to be in the evidence of the images that we see from this rally that it’s a much weaker turnout than August 31st, to show that the energy on the Australian Right is for nationalism. It’s not for this hodgepodge of freedom movement and conservative issues or something. The energy is specifically about nationalism, it’s specifically about immigration. That’s what’s turning people out. That’s what people are angry about.

 

And that’s all that we should really be discussing because that’s the core existential issue. Not that we shouldn’t talk about free speech and other issues, but that needs to be the central animating issue of the Australian right. And if it isn’t, it’s because somebody is a non-White themselves and wants to defend their position in Australia. Someone is a careerist in the political scene and wants to avoid controversy so they can ingratiate themselves with the establishment. It’s one of those two things why someone would want to put on this cuck rally to compete with the March for Australia.

 

Rygo Weber said:

 

“I was at the Melbourne march and was super proud of the boys for protecting everyone. I saw the boys smash through the blockades and numerous normal Aussies cheering on Tom during his speech.”

 

Yes. I’ve just heard only good reports from people that I know that went there that weren’t part of the organisation. And I’m very proud of the boys, what they did in Melbourne. Everyone I know that was in Melbourne has told me that it was the fucking best day of their lives! That it was just fucking awesome! Anarchy on the streets of Melbourne, bashing commies, leading the charge of the patriots.

 

I did feel, I’ll be honest, I did feel kind of sad. I already was feeling sad I was going to miss out on the Melbourne march. It was good that I was in Sydney. We had a really good rally in Sydney. I gave a speech, Jack Eltis gave a speech, another gentleman from the Org gave a speech, and we had a great day out with the NSN in Sydney. Shook hundreds and hundreds of hands! So many people came up to me to thank me for what I was doing, to show their support. We had a great night! Sinking beers with the patriots. It was a great day, great evening, and I loved it! And I was glad to be here in Sydney.

 

But at the same time, the Melbourne rally was just like fireworks! Like and I knew it was going to be fireworks and so I do feel a little bit sad to have missed out. But what a day! What a day for the boys. DJ Triumph said:

 

“Hail Sewell! Hope he returns as leader sooner rather than later. God forbid he ends up martyr for the movement. I have faith the NSM will continue its forward momentum. Blood and honour!”

 

Yeah, well, he will be back out of prison. Hopefully sooner rather than later. I mean, hopefully he gets bail and he has the chance to come out, get his affairs in order, get shit together before, if he does have to serve time before serving it, rather than just being stuck in there. But we’re preparing for the worst, hoping for the best! That’s what we’re doing and we appreciate your support.

 

I know a lot of people have been saying the GiveSendGo is down. We raised $75,000 in like a day through GiveSendGo. Incredible outpouring of support. Then GiveSendGo withheld the donation. Like they basically shut it down and put it under review. We’ve been in contact with GiveSendGo trying to get it restored.

 

So if they don’t restore it, there’s going to be a big problem for GiveSendGo. GiveSendGo, this is a website which enabled that nigger who stabbed a White guy and killed him to raise half a million dollars! This is supposed to be the Right-wing free speech, you know, fundraising platform. They facilitated that. People want to donate money so that Thomas Sewell and the boys can defend themselves in court against charges people feel is unjust. Where they were out trying to have an anti-immigration rally here in Melbourne or here in Australia. Communist pieces of shit engaged in violence to try and stop that. And the boys have now cop charges standing up to those communists. A lot of people, a lot of pro-White people around the world, particularly in Australia, want to support a legal defense to keep these guys out of prison because they recognise that what they did was morally good. Now you can have a position that violence is bad or whatever, but at the end of the day they’re entitled to a legal defense. That’s what the money is being raised for. The money isn’t being raised to go and like pay for people to go and beat up Aboriginals or something it’s to facilitate a good legal defense. Tom and the boys.

 

[1:38:19]

 

So there is simply no justification for GiveSendGo not restoring this. Now we’re giving them a chance to restore it is under review. They haven’t said that:

 

“Nah! It’s over, fuck you!”

 

They haven’t told us to fuck off! If it’s just going to go under review for a few days and they restore it, then okay, that’s okay. It is what it is if they don’t restore it’s going to be a big PR problem for GiveSendGo.

 

A lot of people are going to be very angry and we’ll keep you guys updated as to whether it gets restored or denied or what. So keep an eye out and we’ll let you know. Dimmer 1313 said:

 

“How’s recruitment growing? Has there been an increase in interest since Sunday?”

 

Yes, a lot of recruits coming in. A lot of new people getting vetted that I know about in Melbourne, in Sydney. I’m sure around the country the chapters are growing in numbers and a lot of people have signed up as a supporter. White Australia.org. You should do it right now. If you’re an Australian citizen, sign up as a political supporter@white Australia.org. If you’re a sign up as a social supporter, upgrade to political supporter. Because if you’re a social supporter, that doesn’t necessarily help us to get registered as a political party. You need to be a political supporter so that we can you can be a member of the party proper. When we get registered with the AEC, we need to build this political party. We need to have a big, robust, thick membership so that we can maintain our registration. If it’s like 1, 501 then they can audit a few people and if people don’t return their calls or emails or something, they can cancel the registration.

 

So we need to have a glut of members! We need when you get into the 2000s, the 3000s, the 4000s of political supporters. So please sign up White Australia.org. It costs you nothing. We’ve got very good security. We’re going to do everything we can to protect your identity.

 

Before we register as a party, we’re going to send out information on how you can register as a silent elector so that you can ensure that your name can’t be searched up on the political electoral role. On the electoral role, I should say. Google it right now. How to be a silent elector. Everyone watching this, if you’re in Australia, Google how to be a silent elector. Become a silent elector right now. Just get your name off publicly accessible electoral rolls. It’s very simple. It’s very easy to do. That protects your identity regardless of whether you sign up as a supporter or not.

 

But in particular, you should do that if you want to sign up as a supporter. But we’re not even registering as a party just yet. We’re going to give you warning and send out information on how to do that. But we on our end have really good security, really good protection. Like, if not us, then who? We’re the only people in this country that are going to build a proper, uncompromising, White nationalist political party that has a chance at truly changing the political system in Australia. Completely a wrench into the system. That’s what we are! No one is going to have policies like us. No one is going to have notoriety like us. No one is as effective as us, as we’re going to be in, anywhere close in changing the conversation and subverting the narrative.

 

And ultimately, I really do feel confident we can get people elected. We can get the first Nazis elected basically anywhere in the world in the 21st century here in Australia. WhiteAustralia.org! Like sign up support us. Everything we do is for White Australia! That’s like the be all and end all for us.

 

So if you’re a White Australian, why would you not support a political party that just wants not just to secure this country for the race, but to enable this country to thrive, to restore our national sovereignty, which is under attack economically, militarily and so on. We want to seize control of the banks. We want to delete your mortgages. We want to get rid of usury. We want to make it. We want to rebuild the middle class. We want to pay your misses to stay home and breed White babies. We want to restore the White race in this country. We want the great Australian dream. Big White families. Everyone owns their own home. We have a plan to do it. So White Australia.org!

 

Michael underscore Goldberg 123 said:

 

“What happened to the GiveSendGo?”

 

I just addressed that. RL Underscore Nationalist said:

 

“So you can kill an innocent child and get 2k fine. But if you have a different political opinion, you get a year jail?”

 

Yeah, so, I mean, that was a story where were they Indian, were they Pakistani? There was some kind of like brown subcontinental garbage. They literally ran over and killed a school child. Were they even in school yet? Were they like a preschooler? Like a young child, … Walked away without prison with a small fine. I mean that’s just insane! Like they recklessly endangering children’s lives, killing them, no retribution. But Tom can’t even get bail.

 

So obviously putrid anti-White system! That’s what we’re dealing with. Spencey101 said:

 

“In the first fight you can see a communist who instigated violence wearing gloves inside the designated zone. When gloves are strictly prohibited, his face is shown. Why hasn’t he been arrested?”

 

This is a great point.

 

[1:43:59]

 

So the whole Melbourne CBD was a designated area, which means police can search people for weapons. And if you’re carrying illegal weapons, obviously that’s illegal. And wearing bike gloves if you’re not actually riding a motorcycle is illegal in Australia because they enable you to beat someone up with more effectively, obviously.

 

Anyway, I think it’s kind of a ridiculous law, but nevertheless it is the law.

 

But yeah, Antifa were allowed to have weapons, prohibited weapons and they still got their arse handed to them even though the police have a total double standard. Lieb Dick said:

 

“Good to see you at the march in Sydney, Joel. My mates and I all agreed that it felt much safer and in good hands with the vanguard up front. Hail the vanguard. Hail White Australia. Was good to see you too.”

 

I’m not sure exactly who you are, obviously, but so many people came up and said hello and I really appreciated that if you do see me, I am an approachable guy. If you’re a friendly person, if you’re a supporter. It happens a lot when I go out in public these days. You can come have a chat. I don’t mind. You don’t have to be intimidated. I know I can be intimidating, but I’m actually a nice guy. Lion Cross said:

 

“The September 13th rally is going to be a mess. Antifa regrouping and building bigger numbers to retaliate. Wouldn’t surprise if it gets rolled without the NSN.”

 

Yep. Well, that’s their problem. Hail Yay said:

 

“Shook hands with you before the march in Sydney. Sucks. Tom got arrested.”

 

Yeah, it does. It sucks! Good bloke said:

 

“Would people be judged purely on ancestry or in demonstrated loyalty and contribution to the nation?”

 

Of course we judge people on loyalty and contribution to the nation. It is blood and honour! Not just blood. Blood is worthless without honour. And Good bloke also said:

 

“Would deportations be part of the plan?”

 

Or maybe this is like a multi-Superchat thing. He said:

 

“Would deportation be part of the plan? If so, who would qualify? Migrants only. Or Australian citizens born here as well?”

 

Yeah, just because you have an Australian citizenship doesn’t mean we can’t deport you. Particularly if you’re a dual citizen, or if we can trace your ancestry to some other third world country, we can revoke citizenship and deport people to their shithole of ancestral origin. Ultra Saxon said:

 

“When I look at a man like Sewell I feel as though I’m looking at a Fuhrer as an Anglo Saxon. It makes me feel proud to know Thomas my kin. Hail Sewell!”

 

Well indeed. Thomas Sewell is a supreme gentleman and he just had like a goat run, like what a week. What a week he just had!

 

What have we got more Superchats here? I’m just scrolling through on Entropy the ThinRedLine said:

 

“Thank you NSN from Europe. Free Thomas Sewell! Joel, would you do a stream with Eric Striker?”

 

Well many years ago I did a few with Eric Striker. He talked a lot of shit about me in the time since we had been on good terms. And I did challenge him to a debate on Australian nationalism. Eric Striker claims to be a National Socialist but out of his personal animosity towards me he agreed with the position that Australia doesn’t need National Socialism and should embrace some kind of non-National Socialist nationalism. So I offered to debate him and he left me on scene.

 

Open Borders for Israel said:

 

“Hail Tom, hail Blair, Hail Joel and hail the NSN!”

 

Well thank you. Annabellacaust said:

 

“One month subscriber streak.”

 

Some Not on the Net said:

 

“Booing the acknowledgment of country Anzac Day is the future. Every major city on Anzac Day. It would be great optics for normies yet.”

 

Well next year if they do Welcome to Country at the Anzac Day services, you better all be there, and you better all be booing because it’s just disgusting! I mean that is the day of all days. It is the last day for that shit! Brian said:

 

“Great stream! Hail victory!”

 

I appreciate it. And I saw Annabellacaust left a Superchat last week asking:

 

“How does one approach the lads on Sunday?”

 

Obviously this was in before the rally last week. And it’s as simple as just simply seeing us and coming and saying hello, obviously.

 

So anyway, great stream tonight! I hope you guys enjoyed it. I thought it was a good episode despite Blair’s technical difficulties. And I put up a black sheet behind me which I thought looked quite good. Kind of thought that looked quite nice. I’m gonna do that in the future. But the idea to put it up was literally a few minutes before we started streaming, and so I just used like some shitty tape that I found lying around the house. And about an hour into the stream, the tape gave out. So I think I’m gonna have to get hooks or something for next time.

 

But I think it was a good look! In the chat. Do you like the black sheet? If you like the black sheet, put HH, …

 

[sound cut out for a couple of minutes]

 

I don’t understand why it just like mutes, and then I have to unmute it. I was just going through Superchats.

 

But yeah, what like a technical fuckfest of a stream! I apologise to the patriots out there. The Mossad has been fucking with me. There was a few other Superchats here that I read out. They were pretty like mid Superchats. I’m not going to read them again. What I will say, did you guys hear me talk about the black sheet? I don’t think anyone heard me talk about the black sheet.

 

So what I said was I put the black sheet up at the beginning of the stream. I think it looked good. Yeah, you talked about. So if you like the black sheet, I need to get hooks or something. Put HH. If you don’t like the black sheet, put F, and we’ll see who wins HH or F. You heard this part? We’re getting HHs. Okay. I think we’re going to bring the black sheet back. People saying, add runes to the black sheet. Look, one step at a time. One step at a time. But Heidi Allen said:

 

“No to the black sheet. It looks shit!”

 

I’m getting F’s in the chat! I thought the black sheet looked good! It’s polarizing opinion. I was expecting the black sheet to be popular, but it’s really polarizing opinion. People are saying Aussie flag. Well, look, someone votes for giant hooks. Yeah, well, the hooks are coming. People are demanding runes. Okay, it’s gonna be, … Okay. Who can sew? Who’s good at arts and crafts? Because, you’re making all these demands, like, …

 

But yeah, there’s one Superchat here. Some guy pretending to be a fed. TND 1488, White power saying:

 

“Hail Australia!”

 

And Rygo Weber saying:

 

“That NSN fight video smashing Antifa was so good, it reminded me of the 300 movie.”

 

And like, I love that video of the boys smashing Antifa so much. It’s fucking awesome! But I honestly, I can’t help but feel like I missed out and it makes me depressed. It seemed like the best day ever! Aussie Narralist, I presume he spelled nationalist wrong by mistake said:

 

“His wife will knit me one.”

 

Well, hit me up in the DMs. If your wife is going to knit me one, let me know.

 

But look. Hail White Australia! White power, blood and honour! Hail victory! We’re done. We’re done for the evening. I’m going to end the stream there. Hope you enjoyed the show. See you all next week.

 

[1:53:36]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 9/8/2025 = 68)

[Sorted by latest at top]

GusHayden
Supporter
53 minutes ago
Someone stole bro sheet
0 likes

Report
GusHayden
Supporter
1 hour ago
This is the stuff of folklore, this is the stuff of legend. ~ Joel Davis
0 likes

Report
GusHayden
Supporter
1 hour ago
Blair was 100% spot on around that 27min mark. He was in the zone big time
0 likes

Report
EarthlingCarl
2 hours ago
No offence but I think you guys really need to have more self control as going around getting involved in these fights is just giving the state what they want (it doesn’t matter if you were attacked first). Tom being locked up for 2 years is a nightmare for a movement that’s just getting going.
1 like

Report
WhiteWulfWodanaz
3 hours ago
The arrest of Thomas might have a positive of shutting people up who call you Feds
1 like

Report
Soozysuz
3 hours ago
Melbourne was awesome!! Fuck the commies!
1 like

Report
WhiteWulfWodanaz
4 hours ago
I appreciate Blair being honest and addressing that the camp sovereignty fight was in bad judgement. It’s great to see our guys learning from their mistakes and only getting better. Hail Australia
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
WhiteWulfWodanaz
4 hours ago
I also appreciate what Joel said, that who Thomas is means that you gotta take the good with the bad. And overall it’s good. I do feel sorry for Tom though, I wish him all the best in the world and a swift release into freedom
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
WhiteWulfWodanaz
4 hours ago
Fully agree with Joel that this march was so successful in making people realise they aren’t alone as Nationalists. I know it did so with me. Also agree with Blair that we need to direct that new energy into tangible results like a NS Party
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
WhiteWulfWodanaz
4 hours ago
Love Joel’s anti black pill speech
0 likes
Report
LaserFash
4 hours ago
Tom, and the leadership at large, needs to delegate the punching and rowdy behavior to the ranks. Be a leader and learn to delegate!
2 likes

Report
Bigboy6669
5 hours ago
Hail Thomas sewell
1 like

Report
Soozysuz
5 hours ago
I really hope Tom gets out sooner rather than later. His speech was incredible and not one person I saw turned away, because he was right! Look forward to a massive Australia Day March with millions!
0 likes

Report
ForRealers
5 hours ago
We should plaster that antifa dudes face all over the polices social media accounts and demand his arrest
0 likes

Report
palacepony
Supporter
5 hours ago
That’s a cool clip Joel @ 55:00
0 likes

Report
imSofaKingRayZest
6 hours ago
communism is judaism
1 like

Report
palacepony
Supporter
6 hours ago
Joel sound disappears for around 5 mins @ 37:00 mins. Returns 40:20? Stream beset with a few tech difficulties. Still, a worthy watch. Thanks lads
0 likes

Report
imSofaKingRayZest
6 hours ago
white australia will not slip quietly into the night
1 like

Report
TVR_
6 hours ago
Black sheet goes hard. The flag would be better.
0 likes

Report
imSofaKingRayZest
6 hours ago
free thomas sewell t shirts
1 like

Report
SilphC0
Verified
7 hours ago
Blair always makes such good, sober points. One massive issue with the active clubs around the world is that they’re chock full of grug brain deliquent criminals just looking for opportunities to fight. They simply espouse nationalism as their raison d’être because it gets them closer to punching faces. I just saw some dude, “will2rise” make a video sounding like a total n*gg*r laughing about being in jail for 8 years and how it’s just “whatever”. Active club? Prison is the definition of inactivity. Strategically, our guys should always be doing the utmost to avoid the judicial system but instead the movement is like 90% our guys literally KO’ing eachother all week long and getting brain damage. They never even use their violence against the enemy, it’s ridiculous. Of course these risks are most prevalant for leadership and that’s what makes them so honourable but normalizing going to jail is just being a n*gg*r. The obsession with violence and fighting within organizations edges guys so hard they can’t restrasin themselves from the impulse once they encounter the smallest opportunity. It’s an aspect worth reevaluating.
1 like

Report
TruthWillSetYouFree1488
7 hours ago
Talk about Chabad Lubavitch
0 likes

Report
WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
7 hours ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE
0 likes

Report
Jak_85
Supporter
9 hours ago
Joel Davis’ speeches are alway chilling and legendary. Thomas Sewell does best in the face of adversity and his theological talks are epic
1 like

Report
TuckerLimehouse
Supporter
9 hours ago
It’s becoming clear around the world, we can either fight along side the NS and keep what’s left of our civilizations, or we can be subjects of Communist tyranny.
1 like

Report
NateAus
9 hours ago
great to meet you at the march, got on a video with you on becfreedoms instagram page, keep fighting the good fight
1 like

Report
SunkToTheNutz
9 hours ago
Blair’s right, Joel. Love what you’re doing, but you MUST be more tactical! At this point, Tom being locked up is an unmitigated disaster! Tom’s proven himself long ago, it’s high time to rally the troops with laser-like precision to create a LEGITIMATE new pro-White party. NO more unnecessary blunders!
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
LaserFash
4 hours ago
Tom has proven himself enough and doesn’t need to be the one punching anymore. Be a leader and delegate!
1 like

Report
AmalekAvenger
10 hours ago
you need a producer
1 like

Report
hueyvam123
11 hours ago
Where’s the video?
0 likes

Report
Celsus
11 hours ago
Subscriptions are more dollars in your pocket than superchats. Check out the difference. Someone gifting a subscription to other chat participants is worth more than superchatting an equivalent amount.
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
AmalekAvenger
10 hours ago
what is the best way to get money to the lads ?
0 likes

Report
FancypantsandMP5S
VerifiedSupporter+
14 hours ago
The black sheet of the family
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
10 hours ago
HaHa the Antique glass & house doorway painted white is the true optic winner here
1 like

Report
radi8wl
14 hours ago
Sorry Blair, really! I was one of the few i suppose who defended you on social media back when you were in the spotlight, but right now you are being a negative Nancy, you may think that you sound like a ‘civilized rational high iq gentleman’ with all your quoting of laws, ‘concern’and faux intellectualism, but you just sound scared and effeminate, we need our White Men wielding Power, justly but unmercifully! No amount of pathetic crying from jews,poc, sympathetic White Women should sway our men from doing what is Right and that’s 95%+ population of Whites in White countries! Mixed race, race mixers,poc and all Whites that sympathize w other races above their own go with them bc obv their dna is defective. I’m GenX and the feminization of men is scary even the ones in in the so called dissident right. No dig at you, but Tom is the ONLY man in the ‘far right’ with the not only a high iq, but truly understand the big esoteric picture (except he’s fallen for the jew false characterization of Jesus). Most women are sick to death of cowardly White Men blathering on their podcasts trying to disassociate themselves from the nazzzzeeeeeesssss all while grifting other Whites who are praying for the next Hitler archetype to emerge, it’s ALL that’s happening in USA since the optics cucks won after UTR,we don’t need anymore effin papers, or ‘waking up the normies’ there is nothing new under the sun. And if covid taught us anything, the normies will do what they’re told! I only wish Tom was in America, where all the ‘White Men’sound like you or they’re sheep dipped with retarded jew pagan symbols tattooed on their face, proving to everyone they make bad decisions, or mixed race or civnats, even the guy starting the ‘White’ town has mixed-race family members and defends them lmfao so pathetic here in usa
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
Australian_Terra
10 hours ago
Criticising a bad decision doesn’t make him effeminate.
4 likes

Report
FancypantsandMP5S
VerifiedSupporter+
13 hours ago
The man that sticks by his mixed race family members is a better man than the one that cuts them off. He is obviously making the best of other family members bad choices. Blair is a good guy not everyone on the right has to agree on everything the guy is not a follower
3 likes

Report
JFurM
Verified
14 hours ago
Not surprising but still disappointing for the sake of the movement here in the US, Nick Fuentes criticizing NSN during the March, you don’t see him out there being active!
8 likes

Report
radi8wl
14 hours ago
At the 54min mark had to pause.I’m sorry Blair, we love you, you were ahead of your time in oz, I know you weren’t turned or a subversive, but you sound like your girlfriend talking or any 2013 conservative. It sounds like everything that you’re saying is for some possible future jury in defense of yourself for associating with Thomas. Like you have ptsd and are stuck in whatever year it was when you fought pedo’s in the street. That was Noble you shouldn’t be ashamed. If associating with nsm has you this fearful, maybe take a break bc you’re doing exactly what the optics cucks did here in usa after unite the right. Tbh if you weren’t Blair Cottrell I’d think you were a subversive We need real White Men that have the courage of their convictions. Tom is the Hero we need, the Germans did nothing wrong, it’s 2025 and people know Hitler was the good guy, even if they don’t say it out loud to strangers… Yet!
2 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
Australian_Terra
10 hours ago
Charging the hill was dumb. That’s all he’s saying.
4 likes

Report
freedomfighter356
8 hours ago
mate they already won they could’ve called the police told them what was happening and left Tom and some of the boys could get up to 5 years in jail Thomas Sewel is legit 50% of the group and its growth
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
6 hours ago
2 motorbike cops were across the road from where a 2 on 50 gang bashing took place and the did NOTHING
0 likes

Report
JFurM
Verified
15 hours ago
And exactly what the government wants is NSN to be afraid with all the ridiculous legal nonsense they throw at them, and if that doesn’t work they probably will threaten or enact violence against NSN members, but that’s exactly why the boys need to keep growing in number and keep pushing on.
9 likes

Report
JFurM
Verified
15 hours ago
We do really need to boost and cheer on our Aussie brothers and sisters though, because if they can’t succeed with Nationalism, there is t much hope for the rest of us Anglo nations.
5 likes

Report
Australian_Terra
15 hours ago
Charging the hill was regarded.
0 likes

Report
Dissident_Loner
Supporter
15 hours ago
I feel really sorry for Tom. A good hearted man who looked after orphans. I saw him on PWR with his daughter the other day. His kids are being traumatised. Similar thing with Sam Melia. The Jews behind this are absolutely evil and their Shabbos Goy traitor puppets equally so. They are lashing out in desperation now because they know what fate awaits them when nationalist take power.
29 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
GusHayden
Supporter
1 hour ago
Don’t feel sorry for him. He has God on his side, and he knows it. A lot of us do.
0 likes

Report
JFurM
Verified
15 hours ago
Agree with Joel and Blair (pertaining to the impact of the events of the march specifically with the NSN and Tom) yes, Tom’s myths as a leader is cemented but also yes, it’s getting more dangerous. Just look at what’s going on with the AFD party in Germany! Not a reason to cower, but to count the cost and keep going
5 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
imSofaKingRayZest
6 hours ago
7 dead afd politicians in 3 weeks and the eu has said if the afd win german election they will annul elections blocking them from taking any power ever. stay frosty my white brothers.
0 likes

Report
Sullivista
16 hours ago
So many fucking commercials
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
ItWasMadeUp
VerifiedSubSupporter
16 hours ago
$5 a month subscription to his channel, makes it ad-free & you will be supporting Joel.
2 likes

Report
Trying567
17 hours ago
I’ve tried to boost the other side of the story in comments online, but yeah, the move to charge the hill by the NSN was a major optical blunder. There were enough of them, too, that they probably could have gone to either side of the hill and just done retaliatory defense.
5 likes

Report
TheBeardedIndian
Supporter+
18 hours ago
Jacinta Allan’s face looks droopy like a Basset Hound.
13 likes

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
katana17
10 hours ago
Basset Hound’s object to this comparison!
1 like

Delete
ProletAryan
18 hours ago
I like eric strikers analysis on many subjects but after listening to his podcast for about a year or so, I get the feeling that he has some animosity towards Anglo cultures and Australians in general over some Anglos Vs Wogs complex he has. He has complained about and mentioned before that family members of his who came to Australia to work from South America were supposedly not respected or treated well in Australia.
7 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
Jak_85
Supporter
13 hours ago
I’ve noticed the Med v Northerner nuanced splits over the years as well. It’s subtle but explains a lot.
1 like

Report
PureWhitey
19 hours ago
When Blair is on point he’s got command presence. A powerful speaker.
21 likes

Report
TheQueensGuard
Supporter
19 hours ago
Joels mic disappeared for like 5 minutes that was aids cunt
17 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
GusHayden
Supporter
1 hour ago
Intercepted….
0 likes

Report
freedomfighter356
21 hours ago
Blair’s right what Thomas did was stupid, and generally terrible for the movement
-5 likes

Report
evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
21 hours ago
Boost this question to GiveSendGo asking why they froze White Australia funds: https://x.com/origindevel/status/1964669272745230355
8 likes

Report
Dumpstertron
VerifiedSupporter
23 hours ago
Fuck you Joel!! Fully on board with the NSN agenda but went to shake your hand in Sydney at the August 31 march, but your boys baulked that shit
-5 likes

Report
‹ Hide 3 replies
mharrison52
20 hours ago
people like joel must have body guards. surely you understand why.
4 likes

Report
freedomfighter356
21 hours ago
why?
1 like

Report
TheQueensGuard
Supporter
19 hours ago
probably coz ur jewish lad
1 like

Report
katana17
1 day ago
[Blair Cottrell – Australians Unite to Stop Immigration – Aug 31, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/09/03/blair-cottrell-australians-unite-to-stop-immigration-aug-31-2025-transcript/ [In this video Australian pro-White activist Blair Cottrell gives a running commentary and interactions during his attendance at the Melbourne “March for Australia” event held on August 31, 2025. – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 2,290 – Duration: 21 mins]
6 likes

Delete
katana17
1 day ago
[Thomas Sewell’s Speech at the March for Australia Rally in Melbourne – Aug 31, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/09/06/thomas-sewells-speech-at-the-march-for-australia-rally-in-melbourne-aug-31-2025-transcript/ [Aussie pro-White nationalist activist, founder of NSN, Tom Sewell gives a rallying speech at the March for Australia event in Melbourne on Sun, August 31, 2025: – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 855 – Duration: 8:30 mins]
7 likes

Delete
katana17
1 day ago
[Joel Davis – Patriots in Control of the Streets – Aug 29, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/09/05/joel-davis-patriots-in-control-of-the-streets-aug-29-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists and NSN members Joel Davis and Jacob Hersant discuss the coming March for Australia event that was held on Sunday, August 31st in Australian capital cities to protest against mass immigration. – KATANA] [TRANSCRIPT – Words: 18,189 – Duration: 111 mins]
4 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: We are live. It is the 17th of July, 2025. We had some bizarre technical nonsense going on for some reason, but we got the stream happening. We’re here we have Tom back. First time since Australia Day. We’ve got three of us back together. He’s finally off the ridiculous bail conditions. The South Australian police finally dropped the ridiculous charge of loitering from Australia Day, which I’m sure a lot of you are familiar with the events of that day. But it’s good to have you back, Tom.

 

How do you feel? I mean, I feel personally vindicated. I felt vindicated already considering all the other charges that were dropped. But this really cements the vindication that not just that we didn’t do anything wrong, we knew we didn’t do anything wrong, but that we made the right decision on the day to expose the tyranny. People were saying:

 

“Oh, how does going to jail, going to save the White race?”

 

Well, guess what, we’re not going to jail. Not for this anyway. [chuckling] Jury’s still out whether we go to jail for some other reason, but not for this.

 

So how are you feeling?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I think vindicated is the right word. It is a victory in the sense that we have shown the Australian people that through strength and persistence and resilience, we can get our message across. We can suffer without being humiliated.

 

And I think that’s important that Australians need to hear that. Currently we’re being humiliated as a people. The White Australian population is being obviously replaced and it is being humiliated while it’s being replaced. And if we stand up against this tyranny, they will make us suffer.

 

And I think through our strength, we’ve made it clear that suffering is more valuable than just living a peaceful life that’s ultimately humiliating.

 

So that’s how I feel strength. I feel strong. I feel that our strength and our resilience has proven us right.

 

Joel Davis: That’s a good point because you are naturally adapting to the kind of harassment tactics used to try to prevent you guys from doing what you’re trying to do, whether it’s activism or building the political party. And you do seem to have done or made a great deal of progress in the realm of adaptation. Because I’ll make the point, this basically panned out exactly as you said it would. You said you’re going to cop a beating on the day. You predicted there would be bullshit charges that wouldn’t stick and that have to drop eventually. And now that’s exactly what happened.

 

So not only are you adapting in terms of strategy, but you now know what to expect. As though the system has basically used all its cards and they can only keep doing the same thing they’ve always done. And you keep getting better at dealing with it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. And so much has changed for our organisation in terms of support from the public over the last six months. And I mean, what’s been really incredible is, and I don’t want this taken the wrong way, but we have had a lot of people that are former members of the Liberal Party reach out to us and say that one of the reasons why they have left the party and have started to donate to our cause and started to support our cause is because they can see, based off the election and the Liberal Party moving further to the Left and based off how we were treated by the system in Adelaide, which is, I think it’s a pretty strong liberal kind of state. I mean, Adelaide’s pretty churchy and has a lot of Christians in it and it’s got quite a conservative movement.

 

But this is how, you know, probably one of the more conservative states in the country, other than, I guess, Queensland. This is how they treat political dissidents on the Right. And that for them was the straw that broke the camel’s back. And their reason for supporting us going forward.

 

So it’s interesting that even in persecution, you can gain support and a following and assistance from people that have spent their whole life in mainstream politics. So I didn’t expect that. I didn’t predict that. I did predict that the Australian public in general would be more supportive of us, but I didn’t expect so many people would be jumping ship from the previous conservative faction of the Liberal Party.

 

The last thing I heard from our insiders within the Liberal Party is that about 50% of the members have left in the last two years.

 

And I’m not saying all of those have jumped across to us, but a significant portion of particular branches and seats have come across to show their support for us. So that’s good to see.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s a big number.

 

Joel Davis: It’s a good moment actually. I will say join the movement! Join the prospective political party White Australia.org. I do a bad job of remembering to shill this every week, so I’m just going to say it now while I’m thinking of it. If you’re in Australia, I put out a poll on Twitter a few days. Sorry, on Telegram a few days ago. The poll was, if you’re a White nationalist, how many times have you met up with other White Nationalists, at least one other White nationalist in real life this year to discuss politics or do anything political?

 

Very low bar. 57% of respondents said zero times. That’s crazy! So, like more than half of the Joel Davis spurg Telegram following can’t even meet up once with one White nationalist in real life since the beginning of this year. So I understand a lot of my followers are in other countries and whatever. But that’s a horrible statistic!

 

So if that’s you and you live in Australia, you have no excuse, like our country is being stolen from us. White Australia.org, sign up as a supporter. Maybe you don’t want to come and march in the street dressed in black and you know, get arrested, but you can at the very least join up as a supporter and help us found a political party to represent you and your beliefs, which obviously, if you’re watching this, unless you’re one of the assigned police officers or intelligence agents or journalists watching this, you share our beliefs.

 

So who else is going to represent them? No one except us! So sign up White Australia.org. Be part of the solution!

 

[06:43]

 

Blair Cottrell: Tom, what happened in your latest court appearance and what does that mean for you going forward?

 

Thomas Sewell: So today we had, I think, the third or fourth case conference, which is where the prosecution says they’re not ready to go to trial and they want to have a little bit more time to prepare. And they dragged us out for as many as they could, as many case conferences as they could, until eventually they had to drop the charges. Today the last charge I had was the loitering charge, which was the alleged reason for my arrest outside the Anzac Memorial in Adelaide on, I think it’s called North Terrace. I think the street, very beautiful part of Adelaide. We picked that area on purpose because of how beautiful it was.

 

And obviously I was arrested as I began giving a speech about how the South Australian police are corrupt and are serving traitor politicians.

 

So the whole purpose, the whole meaning or reason for the arrest was dropped and that was done very quickly. And then, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Was that the primary purpose for the arrest? Loitering? Is that what they tried to sell?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: And then when I was arrested and taken back to the police station for allegedly loitering, they said that I’m being charged with loitering, resisting arrest and Nazi symbols.

 

And then when I got my paperwork, it just had loitering and Nazi symbols.

 

And then about six weeks ago, the Nazi symbols charge got dropped, which was the Union Jack and NSN patch on our shoulders.

 

And then obviously today they dropped loitering. But they put on a new charge today, which they hadn’t sent any information about to the magistrate or to my lawyer. And they have charged me with breaching the bail conditions for the loitering charge.

 

So I was under non-Association for loitering. And they’re saying, they’re suggesting, they’re alleging that I breached at some point over the last six months, I associated, they’re alleging, with people in our community.

 

So they’ve dropped the bail conditions because they were attached to the loitering. But there is another court date again for breach of bail.

 

Blair Cottrell: So they’re accusing you of breaching bail on a charge that they’ve dropped?

 

Thomas Sewell: Correct. And I asked the judge that question. I said:

 

“How can someone be charged with breaching bail conditions that were put on me that have now been dropped? Like if I didn’t commit the crime, why was the bail conditions even put on me? And therefore, how could I be charged breaching bail conditions that are put on me falsely?”

 

Blair Cottrell: It would make sense that the conditions imposed during the bail period are now void because it’s been found that there was no evidence to uphold the original charge in the first place.

 

Thomas Sewell: That would make sense, wouldn’t it? That’s common sense. But that’s not, unfortunately, how the magistrate saw it.

 

And instead of answering my question, he instead told me that I was being represented and wasn’t allowed to talk. And I told him to:

 

“Answer my question, buddy!”

 

Blair Cottrell: He wouldn’t have liked that!

 

Thomas Sewell: Because these people don’t deserve any respect. They are absolutely disgusting, corrupt thugs, that think that they can lock Australians up for, in the case of Stephen Wells, 4 months, over 100 days in solitary confinement for charges that were dropped. And they think that they deserve some sort of respect or honour for their disgusting, corrupt behaviour! It’s absolutely putrid! The Australian people should be, it’s absolutely abhorrent what the political class, what the ruling class are putting Australians through.

 

And when I called him, “buddy”, he threatened to have me removed from the call. And I just said:

 

“Okay, well then remove me. Like, you’re nothing, but you’re all corrupt, basically. And I want the record to show that you’re all corrupt.”

 

And then they just booted me from my own court case.

 

So they could have just put me on mute, but instead they just booted me for my own court case.

 

So that’s pretty funny. But they’re just disgusting! I hate them! I absolutely hate them! They’re absolutely disgusting! The prosecutors are professional liars! They put so many good men in prison over nothing. Over nothing! And all the charges have been dropped, except I think Joel’s belt, his [eagle] belt buckle, and one other guy still hasn’t had his loitering charge dropped yet.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, before you ask your question, Joel, if they are so corrupt, I’m assuming you mean the magistrate is corrupt as well?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, all of them. The original magistrate.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, why participate in the process? Like, have you got a plan? What’s the end goal? If they’re so corrupt, like, why answer their summons?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, if you don’t, you eventually get shot!

 

So I’m not looking to get shot at this stage by the police. Ultimately, you have to play the game. You have to abide by the law at all times, only break it to seize power. I think that was Julius Caesar that said that. He also said, Julius Caesar said:

 

“We must endure pain with patience!”

 

And I feel that every day we have to endure this pain with patience. And we’ve been doing that for some time now. And we’re going to keep enduring pain until we take power. And when we take power, then we’ll reassess the laws.

 

[12:11]

 

Blair Cottrell: I can imagine you’re probably holding out for maybe some High Court judges that maybe aren’t corrupt, right?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, that’s a separate issue. So what we are looking to do is bundle all this stuff together with our High Court case, which I think you and Joel have covered a fair bit on the stream. I won’t go into too much detail, but, yes, we are still following through with two plans. One, appealing all the current criminal charges against us regarding Nazi symbols and gestures and any sort of attempt to stop our political communication.

 

And also we are looking to privately sue the police for their behaviour, their unlawful and unconstitutional behaviour.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think old Stephen Wells might have a role to play in that, because I can’t believe that guy spent, how long was it? Nearly four months. Three months. Four months in jail over a loitering charge that was then dropped just because he was trying to celebrate Australia Day publicly. I’ve never heard of anything close to that in Australian activism.

 

Joel Davis: According to High Court precedent, Stephen Wells has standing to go to the High Court and challenge the Constitutionality of what was done to him, of the acts that he was charged under. Because even though the charges were dropped, he did serve time. And particularly because they didn’t just charge him with loitering. Originally they did, but then when they realised that they’d have to release him after three months because it has a maximum sentence of three months. They then slapped a Nazi symbol charge on him in order to enable them to extend his stay in prison basically beyond the three month mark.

 

So he has standing to challenge that law at the High Court now because there’s been plenty of precedent established in High Court decisions that you don’t have to be being actively prosecuted under a particular law. You only need to have standing to go to the High Court. You just simply need to have suffered as a result of that law, that potentially unconstitutional law, and have reason to suspect that it could be applied to you again in the future. Now the Nazi symbol charge related to literally the symbol of our organisation or the NSN at the very least.

 

And so if you’re a member of the NSN, basically what they’re trying to say is that you could get arrested and thrown in prison for displaying our logo in public.

 

So it’s a political organisation. It seems like a pretty clear cut and dry constitutional issue.

 

So that’s what’s interesting that they’ve kind of facilitated Stephen potentially to go to the High Court. Also. Stephen Wells is up for a very handsome compensation payout. And so I think Stephen Wells will get paid very well for his four months. And Stephen Wells, the upstanding character that he is, he was saying to me today that:

 

“I want to sue these cunts, get as much money out of them as possible and then put that money away. So the next time someone gets arrested, they’ve got money to support them like the people who supported me.”

 

So he’s already like looking to be altruistic and pay it forward rather than just, I don’t know, sit on the cash, which he’s entitled to. So top bloke Stephen Wells! But it’s, I think he’s quite happy to do four months in prison and have a kind of epic story that inspires people and then go and collect money from ZOG and put it in the White Australia kitty, and so on. And now we’ve got standing to go to the High Court as I said.

 

So realistically we’ve taken a lot of wins here for not much suffering. I mean he had to suffer in prison. But the rest of us, we didn’t really need to suffer like we had minor inconveniences basically that we had to suffer. But the positive outcome from all of this has been to I think win a lot of sympathy in the public and gain a bit of legal leverage that we can now use.

 

Because when we set up this political party, obviously we’re contesting elections and it’s probably not going to be realistic that we’re going to go in and win government at the first election that we contest. Right? So we need something to do other than just march around and declare what we believe and try and get someone to vote for us.

 

And so these legal cases, not just these ones, but probably, I anticipate once we form the political party, there could be other High Court cases where they’re trying to take guns away from people who associate with us. We’re probably going to have to go to the High Court to try and protect their gun rights. There’s going to be stuff to do with the de-banking. Tom was saying he was intending on taking to the High Court. Then also, if we register our political party and then we have accounts on Instagram, Twitter, Facebook and so on, and they try to de-platform us, were currently de-platformed from these websites, well, then we’ve also got standing to go to the High Court and say these companies are basically impairing representative democracy, which is unconstitutional. They’re impairing our right to political communication. As a registered political party in Australia, how can Australians have a representative democracy if their own political parties can’t even communicate to the voters what their policies are? So we’d have a very strong case there.

 

I think that would have a lot of sympathy in the community because there’s so much push in the state at every level to increase censorship on the Internet. And this could be one of the only ways really to strike back without taking power and reversing all these laws and getting rid of the eSafety Commission and all this garbage, would be to try and get to the High Court and get a decision that would establish precedent that would limit state overreach and the overreach of these big tech companies.

 

So these legal battles are going to be very important for us going forward and if we can have some successes or at least, you know, stand up sympathetically for our rights as Australians, could be a great way to also raise a lot of support for the party and the movement in general to see that we’re trying to engage in productive battles to defend the rights and freedoms of Australians, even outside of political power.

 

[18:28]

 

Blair Cottrell: If I’m understanding correctly, Tom, you’re now a free man, limited by no legal conditions of association. You can now train with the boys, you can associate with who you want. I’m imagining this because you’re on the stream with us for the first time in a while. The reason you haven’t been able to jump onto the stream with Joel or I, or with Joel specifically, is because he’s a member of your organisation. Am I right in believing this? You’re a free man now? Well to some extent.

 

Thomas Sewell: Relatively, yeah. I’m not currently having my political communication suppressed by the Magistrates Court, but I do still have three pending court cases regarding other matters that are, like including the so-called offensive behaviour in Ballarat. Doing a political demonstration in Ballarat. Jacob Hersant’s also been charged with offensive behaviour for a rally he did in Melbourne CBD So those two rallies, both rally leaders or rally spokespersons, like the speakers of both those rallies have been charged. Myself and Jacob. Joel, have you been charged yet with offensive behaviour?

 

Joel Davis: No, they’re still investigating me for the jews Hate Freedom rally. But they’ve got 12 months, so they can basically, … They’re also investigating me for offensive behaviour also for when we had the boys, my rabbi friends, and we went down and endorsed the Liberal Party at the last election. And yeah, so we’ll see if they end up charging me on those, but we don’t know yet.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, so another tactic they’re using, Blair, is they’re confusing political speech with like public misconduct.

 

So they’re trying to use laws that stop you from mooning a police officer or something silly like that. Or I think it’s like really bad swearing or something like that. They’re trying to use these laws to prevent political communication. The same way in Adelaide they tried to use loitering as a law to stop us from politically communicating.

 

But yeah, so I’m on bail for those and I have trials upcoming this year for those cases. But yeah, I’m allowed to associate at this stage. Yes.

 

Blair Cottrell: I watch updates on Australian like motorcycle clubs sometimes just like Crime Updates, news on YouTube. It’s just a side interest of mine and I can’t help but notice that I think they’re trying to treat you guys the same way they treat some of these so-called outlaw motorcycle clubs. Because in Australia, if you don’t know, we have bikie gangs. In Queensland specifically, I’m pretty sure there’s strong legislation making it very difficult for those gangs to operate. I’m pretty sure you can’t even have a gang or MC club logo or insignia. Like you can’t even display it publicly. Or even have it in your house. If they know you’ve got it, they’ll raid you and take your jumper because it has a club logo on it.

 

And I’m just noticing similarities between the way the police treat you guys down here. It’s like they want you to be an outlaw gang and they expect to be able to get away with treating a political organisation which in the near future will be a registered political party, like they’re an outlaw gang. And I don’t think that’s going to fly. There’s no precedent in Australian legal history where that’s being tolerated by serious levels of court.

 

Of course, magistrates levels of court seem to tolerate whatever they’re told to tolerate. But I think once you get to county and beyond, you’ll probably see some judges and some outcomes that are more favourable to what is fair and actually legally applicable for you guys.

 

So, yeah, I’m glad you’re out! Well out of the conditions that were binding you and I’m glad you’re able to join us again.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: What’s going to be the main thing on our agenda? What are we going to go on with lads?

 

Joel Davis: Well, I think the big thing to discuss this week in international politics is the way that Trump is trying to really unsuccessfully sweep the whole Jeffrey Epstein thing under the rug. I mean, obviously the cover-up has been successful. They’ve managed to, well first the FBI and the Attorney General of the United States came out last week and said:

 

“Oh, the Epstein files, they don’t actually don’t exist. We’ve concluded our investigation and they don’t exist!”

 

Just tried to gaslight everyone. And obviously the reaction from just everyone in the world basically was:

 

“What do you mean they don’t exist?”

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, explain to me, Joel, explain to me. And for the audience, to make it simple, what are the Epstein files? What do they consist of? Is it a list of clients that were in a prostitution ring? Because that’s my understanding. Is that right?

 

[23:23]

 

Joel Davis: I’m sure the files contain a lot more than just that.

 

But obviously the files would contain names of who’s going there and there’s been all these allegations that potentially these people are named and those people like Bill Clinton or Prince Andrew and blah, blah, blah, and photos of different elites and that were involved with Jeffrey Epstein and so on, and people going to the island, the flight logs, the so-called Lolita Express that was taking all these people out to this private island in the Caribbean. But obviously we don’t know what’s in the files because the files have not been released. Right.

 

But there was a promise before the last election that if Trump was to win, the files would be released, which no one intelligent believed. But even like Donald Trump Jr. was saying:

 

“Release the files!”

 

You know, blah, blah, blah.

 

Blair Cottrell: And now they’re saying there are no files. Is that right

 

Joel Davis: No, they’re not actually saying that now. Now they said that. And then a few days later, Trump changed the narrative to, not there are no files, to:

 

“Well, the Democrats they’ve concocted fake documents!”

 

And the whole Jeffrey Epstein thing apparently is a Democrat op, just like the Steele dossier and blah, blah, blah. And:

 

“It’s a hoax and it’s a political witch hunt and all this stuff trying to undermine me!”

 

He’s trying to spin it like this. But it’s ridiculous!

 

Number one, because Jeffrey Epstein committed, quote, unquote, “suicide”. You know, no one really believes that he killed himself.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh yeah, I heard the footage that they had of him in jail. Someone ran it through a metadata analysis and found that it had been edited several times. They could even tell the programme it was edited with. So the stuff that they released or had regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s suicide has all been doctored and edited. That’s not the real footage of his so-called suicide.

 

Joel Davis: Well, also, when that occurred he was under the Attorney General of the United States was Bill Barr. Bill Barr’s father, by the way, employed Jeffrey Epstein a long time ago and they have long, deep family connections to one another. Bill Barr was made Attorney General of the United States by Trump. He was in the Trump administration and he was the one running the Department of Justice who had Jeffrey Epstein incarcerated.

 

So it was under his watch that Jeffrey Epstein was killed and it was under his watch that it wasn’t investigated and that it was covered up.

 

So the Trump administration covered this up to begin with. Also, Donald Trump himself was friends with Jeffrey Epstein from the 1980s onwards. They allegedly, their friendship allegedly broke down in the 2000s because they had a dispute like Trump bought some condo in Palm beach in Florida that Jeffrey Epstein wanted to buy and they had some dispute. But they were very close friends. There’s lots of video footage showing this and Jeffrey Epstein even described Donald Trump as his “best friend” at one point in the 1990s.

 

So that’s obviously very important to bring up.

 

And also there’s plenty of people in the Trump administration or around Trump, like Trump’s Lawyer Alan Dershowitz, who is a jew and who was one of the main lawyers working on the whole election fraud, so-called lawsuits and so on after the 2020 election. He was also Jeffrey Epstein’s Lawyer and apparently went to the island and so on. There’s just so many connections between Trump and Epstein and Trump’s original administration and associates and Jeffrey Epstein. The list just goes on. We could do a whole stream just detailing all this stuff. So move forward.

 

Obviously there’s a lot of Democrats that are implicated in this too, like the Clintons and so on. So the Democrats aren’t going to release the files. The Democrats aren’t going to hold people to account for what’s happened here either.

 

But Trump is saying because the Democrats were sitting on the files over the last four years, magically they’ve changed them all and he doesn’t want to release them because apparently he’s basically admitting guilt that he’s in the files.

 

Elon Musk came out a few weeks ago and said they’re not being released because Trump’s in the files. Put the pressure on Trump after they fell out. And the pressure is telling, because now while Trump is every day coming out saying:

 

“No one cares about Jeffrey Epstein, everyone needs to stop talking about it.”

 

And so on. We’re seeing more and more elements of his base, of his movement turning on him. Tucker Carlson is giving speeches.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I turn on my YouTube. I don’t even watch stuff in relation to Jeffrey Epstein. I know almost nothing about it. I know what most people would know that is that there is some sort of list or documents implicating people in very unethical activities, probably for the purposes of Israeli blackmail and influence over American politicians. That’s what I know. And I turn on my YouTube and all throughout my recommended videos is people that usually do streams on video games or conspiracies who don’t even usually talk about this stuff, like doing videos on this stuff. So it’s just across the board. Have you seen much of it?

 

Joel Davis: I saw an opinion poll by the way of Americans:

 

“And do you agree with how Trump is handling the Jeffrey Epstein case?”

 

And it was like 12% said yes. So he’s lost everyone. Like no one’s going along with this shit! But go ahead Tom.

 

Thomas Sewell: I don’t have anything to add on the Epstein thing. It’s obviously been covered. It’s my only observation, …

 

[28:55]

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you agree that it kind of feels really drawn out. It’s almost like I’m sick of hearing it. It’s like it’s been going on for so long and nothing’s ever come of it. Maybe they’re trying to create that feeling, just kind of make people feel fatigued.

 

Thomas Sewell: Maybe. I think that it’s a weapon that both sides have used against each other.

 

So when the Democrats were in power with Biden, they had the Biden laptop scandal and they had obviously a lot of people in the Democrat Party were connected to Epstein and other people that were on the Lolita Express. A lot of a list celebrities are Democrats and they were all on the list.

 

And then now that Trump’s in power being, you know, turned back on Trump obviously photos way back in the day, like before the 2020 election came out that showed Trump as friends with Epstein and Trump making comments about how Epstein’s got a particular taste in younger women. And Trump was saying that he kind of agreed with it. It was a bit incriminating. You know, if you were Italian, there’d be plausible deniability that you’re talking about 18 year olds or something. Anyway, I digress.

 

I think that it’s interesting to see a mega civil war or MAGA civil war, however you want to pronounce it. I think it’s good to see that there are these kind of Qtard, you know, conspiracy theorist, you know, MAGAs or Make America Great Again camp that all of a sudden are telling people to move on from a legitimate conspiracies, a legitimate Mossad blackmail entrapment scheme. Because they always want you to focus on conspiracy theories, but just not the ones that are real. They want you to focus on nonsense and talk about Antarctic, well, not necessarily nonsense, but they want to talk you about side quest things like Antarctica and 5G and stuff like that.

 

But then this is just black and white! This is an Israeli Mossad blackmail scheme. It’s undeniable, it’s a fact. And these people want us to brush it under the table.

 

And it just shows that, yeah, the MAGA camp is dead. It ties in good timing as well with obviously the tension between, you know, Musk, who’s a power broker in the US and Donald Trump. And so seeing the MAGA camp fall apart is a good thing. It’s a good thing. And it’s a good thing for the same reason why we’ve worked so hard to destroy the Liberal Party here in Australia, successfully destroy the Liberal Party here in Australia.

 

Americans need a form of Right-wing, pro-White politics that is superior to Make America Great Again. They need a much harder and more staunch, more ideologically consistent. It’s not just a kind of cult of personality around Donald Trump. So I’m watching, I’m watching along.

 

Joel Davis: What was very interesting this week was Tucker Carlson gave a speech at the Turning Point USA event where he basically said Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad agent. And this is being swept under the rug. How come Israel can blackmail our politicians with sexual blackmail, with a paedophile ring, and there’s a conspiracy on both sides of politics to cover it up:

 

“How is this acceptable?”

 

And the crowd was going ballistic at this conservative event. At Charlie Kirk’s Hail Israel Hail ZOG conservative event. The crowd’s still going ballistic.

 

So there’s been a sea change where conservative political discourse in the United States has become dominated by dissident Right talking points ideas. And the younger generation of Right-wingers in the United States and I think everywhere are turning against the jews, against Israel. They’re more radical on racial issues. And Tucker Carlson coming out and doing that, basically he just pissed in Trump’s face. And then Trump came out this few days ago and said:

 

“Well, anyone who wants to talk about Epstein, I don’t want their support. They’re fake supporters and we’re done with them.”

 

So what is he saying? He doesn’t want Tucker Carlson support, doesn’t want the support of Matt Walsh. I saw Matt Walsh come out and criticise Trump on the same grounds. Like so many of these really big, like massive following influential conservative commentators that come out on the side of the people against Trump.

 

And so what this is the foundation of a new American Right, in my opinion, that moves beyond Trump, that embraces more radical talking points. And it seems like Elon Musk is willing to fund these guys too.

 

So it’s shaping up to be quite interesting to see how this develops over the next couple years because a lot of people thought after the last election, Peter Thiel got his J.D. Vance, you know, curry burner, vice president installed. And Trump will just basically bamboozle all the Boomers and all the masses with his charisma and his policies and everyone will de-radicalise and then JD Vance will end up just being the heir to the throne and then he’ll become president and they’ll just hold this paradigm of politics down on lock for the next decade and we’re just going to have to eat the slop.

 

Well, actually, I don’t think so. actually, this has completely blown things up and now it seems like a more radical challenger could emerge to take the throne off The Prince.

 

So it’s quite interesting to observe.

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you guys think about, because you mentioned Tucker Carlson. What do you guys think about Tucker Carlson? What’s his game? Because his message has become more explicit in the last year or so. and where does he stand? Do you trust him?

 

[35:03]

 

Thomas Sewell: No! [chuckling] I don’t trust him.

 

But it’s an improvement of controlled opposition, certainly. If the controlled opposition has to continue moving further and further to our direction, well, eventually they’ll have to run a controlled opposition which is just a copy of us.

 

And I think people will choose the real us over the controlled opposition copy of us, when it gets to that point.

 

So, yeah, it’s a good to see, it’s very good to see the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Battle there is to continue existing. Yeah, because they won’t want you to exist. Right. But if he’s controlled opposition, Tucker Carlson, who’s controlling him, do you think? What are your theories?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, I think he’s in the CIA. Yeah, I think he’s in the CIA.

 

So I think he’s part of a different faction within the Deep State. And I think Trump was an independent person that was being influenced by different factions within the CIA.

 

And I think that perhaps they’re jumping ship from Trump. I don’t think that Tucker Carlson is entirely aligned with Musk, for example. I think he’s kind of like a fourth party when you think about it. I don’t know too much about Democrat politics, but I think the Right-wing is moving in an odd direction where there’s the Trump camp, there’s the Musk camp, and there’s the, what you could call like the Tucker camp. And I think those are the three most powerful forces in the American Right.

 

Blair Cottrell: I expect you have your reasons for believing that. There’s probably plenty of information that suggests that. I haven’t personally looked into it. What do you think, Joel?

 

Joel Davis: His father was a CIA agent. That’s confirmed. And then Tucker himself said that he wanted to join the CIA in the 1990s when he finished college, but he didn’t make the grade, apparently. He didn’t get the contract. So then he decided to become a journalist. But that seems, I don’t know [chuckling] if I believe that story.

 

Thomas Sewell: Bullshit!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Bullshit, because the CIA are desperate for recruits, and especially recruits with a high IQ, which he has. And it’s a fact that the CIA hires thousands and thousands of journalists a year. Hires people to become journalists.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. There’s something called Operation Mockingbird. Google it. Yeah. If you don’t know what it is.

 

Thomas Sewell: I mean, it’s slightly different, but it’s on the same talking point. You know, the Director General of ASIO only two or three years ago came out in a Senate inquiry and said that:

 

“They employ journalists, that they could be a journalist, they could be a teacher, they could be whatever, and they’re actually secretly an ASIO agent. We’re everywhere, basically.”

 

And in the case of journalism, it’s very important to have intelligence services control journalism. That’s probably the key industry for intelligence services to control.

 

Joel Davis: Also, if you want to understand Tucker Carlson’s motivations, I think the motivations could be understood if he is like a CIA operative or at least connected to the Deep State, is geopolitical.

 

So what does Tucker Carlson basically do with his influence? He plays down the whole Russia thing, criticises Zelensky, criticises funding the war in Ukraine. Now he’s criticising Israel and the involvement with Israel.

 

But he’s also always been a China hawk who has been very consistent that China is the real threat. America needs to focus on fighting China. And there’s other elements in the Trump administration and across the American Right who have that view. Elbridge Colby, who’s the Undersecretary of Defense, he’s been saying that for years, and now he’s the Under Secretary of Defense. He just came out the other day demanding that Australia and Japan commit to fighting alongside the United States if Taiwan is invaded, to give you an idea of what he’s all about. And he’s also the main guy in the Trump administration trying to block assistance to Ukraine and so on, because he thinks it’s taking away from a deterrent and potential action against China in vis a vis Taiwan.

 

So Tucker Carlson comes along and he can kind of wrangle the Crown by pushing this kind of anti-Ukraine, anti-Israel, which are both very popular with conservatives Angles in order to kind of push for a war with China or China, Hawking, at the very least, in addition to having a very kind of patriotic, you know, style and so on. You can see why the CIA would look upon him as someone or look upon that style of politics as something that they would support because they would see it maybe as in the geopolitical interests of the United States. And that’s what the CIA is fundamentally like. It’s fundamental reason for existing is basically keeping America the global hegemon.

 

Blair Cottrell: For our American viewers, I know we’ve had Thomas Rousseau on the show, leader of Patriot Front. Is he the primary guy, organisation, political faction or personality you guys would endorse in America? Is there someone else? Is he the main man? I mean, who’s the real deal?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, Thomas is, and Patriot Front is the most organised and they are the largest White nationalist group in the United States. They hold their cards a little bit closer to their chest than us in terms of their ideology. They keep things a little bit more “heritage American”, as they say. And that’s their strategy. It’s kind of like a halfway point between what we’re doing and the United Patriots Front, obviously, without UPF being a purely anti-Islam movement, it being a Patriot Front. So it, yeah, it’s definitely a specific tactic that he’s using and he’s done quite well with it. And they continue to grow.

 

There are a lot of other organisations. The Rob Rundo active club model was quite large and it’s all across the country. So their groupings are a lot smaller. You know, you’re talking usually five to ten guys at a time, but there are hundreds of groups of five to 10 guys.

 

And then you have Hammer, doing Blood Tribe. So we get accused of being wignats, but we’re pretty light on the wignatory compared to particular people in America.

 

And you’ve got all sorts of groups. You’ve got Wagner’s group, you’ve got Volkers Resistance Movement, you’ve got, … There’s a lot of groups in the United States. It’s very different to Australia in that sense. We’ve kind of co-ordinated all of the White nationalist energy all into one body, which has its pros and cons.

 

But in the United States, I think Patriot Front probably control 30 or 40% of the market, if you want to put it that way. But they certainly have over 90% of the visibility. What they’ve done very well is they’ve got the majority of the visibility.

 

[42:03]

 

 

[Remainder of Transcript in Progress]

 

 

[2:38:14]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 7/24/2025 = 33)

Blitz007
6 days ago
these people are great and we need more of em
18 likes

Report
WHITESUNITEWORLDWIDE
6 days ago
TEAM WHITE UNITE
12 likes

Report
Strueth
6 days ago
Thanks guys, I love listening to your chats… I don’t feel so alone in our country knowing you have our backs and are willing to stand up for our white Australia… I long for how it was in the 70’s… we had it all, and slowly it’s been taken right out from under us, betrayed by those wimps in parliament… Thank you
9 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
palacepony
Supporter
4 days ago
The fuckery really kicked off with Whitlam. Constitutional vandalism which needs to be addressed. That was when the gloves came off with Vietnamese immigration and demoralising ‘liberal’ law pushes. We were ruled by TV and under the oogabooga blues spell.
2 likes

Report
StevenGurr
6 days ago
Absolute total bullshit Sick of these cunt pigs and courts. Loitering isn’t even an arrestable offence and then to continue adding simple offences is a joke. And further to add non association conditions on the bail is totalitarian shit. Keep up the fight and go after every individual pig, judge and state lawyer involved.
5 likes

Report
Dissident_Loner
Supporter
6 days ago
Hey! The Three Amigos!
2 likes

Report
Restlessdreams88
6 days ago
88 .
1 like

Report
mharrison52
6 days ago
rome, pheonixian, ancient arayans in India. Mexica, Brazil, All of central and south america. America and Candada now. every great white civilization has ended the same way mongrolzation then conplete collapse. It’s a trend about whites that we cant afford to mistake again. in aglobal society there are no where to go. global genocide.
1 like

Report
Sieger88
6 days ago
Unfortunately Aston Martin is now owned by the kíke Strulović
0 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
paceytarzan
6 days ago
Sieg
0 likes

Report
Winstein_Synagoguehill
6 days ago
Luxury and comfort made the yankees soft. There’s not much of a White working class in the USA. Most working class are Amerindian and African. Go into a boxing gym in the USA and there’s not a single White person. Completely reversed from Britain and Ireland. American families the mother is usually the boss and dad has been cucked to a little muted nub.
0 likes

Report
KeithyFM
5 days ago
Turks and Greeks… chalk n cheese. Turks should be back in Turkmenistan.
0 likes

Report
Motion937
5 days ago
The mustache without the beard looks goofy with the shaved head.
0 likes

Report
Motown88
Supporter
4 days ago
Yes there are young women that have resisted the feminist conditioning, 5 of them are my daughters… and I’m so proud.
0 likes

Report
deputydawg000
4 days ago
CritalEyeMMA on youtube and AntiwokeMMA on rumble is also worth a look. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iz_LOvsbMiM https://rumble.com/v6w0l5s-livestream-one-year-anniversary.-its-the-jews.-race-realism-live-stream.html?e9s=src_v1_wh&playlist_id=watch-history
0 likes

Report
Orangejoos
4 days ago
Very pragmatic , and informed discussion . Always appreciate the three of you. I’m only informed by Nick otherwise , the rest is almost entirely bullshit or toxic. Thanks — for all you hero’s do.
0 likes

Report
wyrdweasel
3 days ago
I think that you have had to do something blackmailable in order to be able to do business at the highest level and to join the club. When everyone in that circle has something on everyone else, there would be a certain kind of mutual insurance when it comes to the threat of exposure.
0 likes

Report
empowerprivate
2 days ago
Rabbis, when they are sucking blood out, it’s Adrenochrome.
0 likes

Report
Restlessdreams88
19 hours ago
Gotta get Jacob on more
0 likes

Report
katana17
6 days ago
[Joel Davis – MechaHitler – a Manifestation of Musk’s Machiavellianism, or Something More? – Jul 11, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/07/17/joel-davis-mechahitler-a-manifestation-of-musks-machiavellianism-or-something-more-jul-11-2025-transcript/
-1 like

Delete
mharrison52
6 days ago
aTom has Aura like an Anglo Addy
-1 like

Report
hueyvam123
6 days ago
The best. Great to see the gang back together again.
-1 like

Report
EarthlingCarl
5 days ago
No hate but is Joel rocking a comb over?
-1 like

Report
RadicalAIAgenda
5 days ago

-1 like

Report
whitehonkymonkey
5 days ago
hello lads,good to see the crew back together. though it feels like a win with the courts,its all about getting rid of us on the day. they don’t give a f… about the arrests not sticking ,as long as they pull you off the street on the day. your tactics also need to create distractions when out protesting. create confusion. keep it up lads.
-1 like

Report
BasedNapoleon
5 days ago
Just watched ‘Latham at Large’ where Mark Latham featured as a guest journalist on 60 minutes covering the 2010 election between Tony Abbott and Julia Gillard. He deconstructed the campaign process and pressed Abbott about migration.
-1 like

Report
UncircumcisedCircus
5 days ago
I do think there is a waspy faction of the CIA that doesnt want to always take orders from the Mossad.
-1 like

Report
DaveScribe
5 days ago
Blair, all it takes is an accusation. Ironic since you were accused of stalking by a woman who was stalking you. It’s not uncommon for the perpetrator to call the police first in order to allay suspicion off from themself. I was in a holding cell with a middle aged white engineer who had a knife pulled on him by his neighbor. The neighbor called the cops first & got the engineer arrested.
-1 like

Report
Motown88
Supporter
4 days ago
Great stream guys, thanks
-1 like

Report
ProvingNihil
4 days ago
Would love to meet white nationalists in my area but can’t find any in my state.
-1 like

Report
ProvingNihil
4 days ago
Also when dating a woman, hell or just interacting with anyone in general. I personally record it on my GoPro, yeah it’s a tad bit weird some people don’t understand, but you never know what will happen, especially with women.
-1 like

Report
Makulatoren
VerifiedSupporter+
4 days ago
I disagree with Thomas about Tucker Carlson. The CIA would never betray the mossad in that way of having matyr made on. Because then they would lose their Epstein tickets. Tucker is just acting like the average boomer. He wants to back to the american ideal but knows deep down that it was fake. Yet he still yerns for it.
-1 like

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript