Joel Davis: Hello, welcome to the stream. Another show this evening, The Joel and Blair Show. It is the 6th of the 6th! Ominous! 6th of June, 2025. Big show for you tonight. A lot to discuss. A lot’s going on. We’re going to be talking about the N-word. We’re going to be talking about all kinds of things on the show this evening. The question is where to begin.

 

Also, we’re streaming live on Comfies on Comfy Friends X channel. So we lost quite a few viewers when we got banned from X. So it’s nice to be back on X. Nice to have another platform back open to the show. So hello to all the viewers on X. Strap in. Should be a good show this evening.

 

Yeah, it’s pretty fucking cold down here in Melbourne. I got the heater going. I’m pretty cosy. But how you feeling, Blair? You like the cold weather? I actually don’t mind the cold weather. It’s kind of spiritually centreing. But I know you love it because the summer, it just irritates you.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, I’m always irritated by something, but I’m less irritated in the cold. I’m not really sure why. I seem, I don’t know, my neurons fire better in the cold. I think we’re more genetically adapted to the cold, our kin, members of our race. I don’t know, I just seem to be happier when the weather’s a little cooler. I mean, what do you want? You want to lay in bed sweating all night, getting eaten by mosquitoes? It’s not for me, man! I don’t know why people like going to these third world countries for holidays like Thailand and all that shit! Like:

 

“Oh, my God, everything’s so cheap!”

 

Yeah, it’s cheap because it’s a shit hole! And no one actually wants to live there. They make all their money through tourism. It’s too hot there! I don’t really. I’m not interested in that kind of weather. I like to be far away from the equator.

 

But Joel told me, I wasn’t going to wear the beanie because I thought it’s a bit of its a bizarre kind of a beanie. I don’t have any other beanies. This has kind of been handed down to me. I’ve had it for a long time. But Joel said it looked “ornamental”. So I don’t know if that’s good or bad, but you’re gonna have to endure the beanie, guys. Look, sorry if it looks stupid. I’m not taking it off. My head’s cold.

 

02 Trump vs Musk Feud

top

 

Joel Davis: Hold frame! Don’t concede frame like that, don’t concede frame like that.

 

But, yeah, no, I got the beanie on to, because I just want to be cosy, feel cosy. But yeah, so let’s get into it.

 

I mean, there’s a lot to break down. Today, all the news breaking, waking up this morning, Australian time, and all the news breaking of Elon Musk and Donald Trump falling out. That’s kind of interesting. Like, I wasn’t expecting to cover that on the show tonight. Kind of you could see that brewing for a while, but I wasn’t expecting it to blow up like that. I think maybe we will kind of analyse that, but maybe later in the show.

 

03 Clip of NSN Rally in Melbourne – Ban Niggers Not Machetes

top

 

But first there was a kind of provocative rally. I don’t know who did it. These guys, they all dress in black and so on. I don’t really know who they are, but it was kind of interesting. They had an interesting little banner drop, kind of banner action the other day. They put out a video. So maybe we could play the video and then. Yeah, then we could analyse it.

 

[Start of clip]

 

9 news: Bouquets of flowers marking another victim of Victoria’s machete crisis. Police say up to 10 young men of African appearance are, still on the run. A teenage boy has escaped. Injuries unleashed.

All seven people allegedly involved in that violent machete brawl at Melbourne’s Northland Shopping Centre have now been arrested. That’s good news. So Andrew McCormack is in Melbourne, Maca. It comes as the state’s landmark machete ban comes into effect today.

Anita Allan (Vic State Premier): These knives are dangerous weapons. They have no place on our streets anywhere! And that is why I will introduce as many laws to get these dangerous knives off the streets.

NSN members: Chanting (with “Ban Niggers Not Machetes” banner), White man! Fight back! White man! Fight back! White man! Fight back!

7 News: Police are investigating after a mob of masked militants gathered at Northland Shopping Centre in the early hours of this morning.

[End of clip]

 

Blair Cottrell: Funny how we didn’t have much of a problem with knife crime in Australia until the government filled the country full of Africans. [chuckling] But it’s the knives that are the problem, not the people wielding them! Not the people with sub 70 IQs that don’t really understand how to deal with conflicts or get what they want through any other method than by using a knife. That’s not the problem! It’s the knives themselves! Can you believe these people? I don’t know. Joel, what do you think?

 

[05:37]

 

04 Tactical Use of the N-Word, Pros and Cons

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean this it was interesting to watch the reaction to this, because by the standards of NSN rallies, this one was pretty tame. But just because there was a tactical N-word on the banner, it got a massive response online. Just from my clicking around on TikTok and Instagram and Twitter and so on. It accumulated more views. Like the short phone clip video of the action. It accumulated more views than Australia has people. I counted at least 30 million views. Not to mention it was broadcast on the news. And not to mention whoever else uploaded it or reacted to it, I didn’t see.

 

So this went very viral! Like this got a lot of attention online. And it got a lot of attention in not in, not with, not necessarily the most politically engaged audiences, because it was posted by mainstream media accounts or other just kind of random news accounts and so on.

 

So initially it was posted on Twitter. It was posted by people connected to the so-called dissident Right. And you know, a lot of people liked it, obviously.

 

But also it drew a lot of criticism from people who said:

 

“Oh this just associates our worldview with incivility and with vulgarity. And this is just going to turn people off. And normal people they’re willing to have an adult conversation about immigration and crime and even like race and crime, but not when you go dropping the N-word.”

 

But then I started reading the comment sections on Instagram and TikTok and so on, and the comment sections were dominated by seemingly normal people, loving it! And saying, “there’s nothing wrong here”. They were very supportive. They were saying:

 

“How come White people can’t stand up for ourselves? That’s a double standard, blah, blah blah.”

 

Basically siding with the demonstration. There wasn’t too much discussion of “are these people feds?” There wasn’t all this discussion of “is the N-word offensive?”. Now obviously Leftists and non-Whites in particular, non-Whites didn’t like the rally and reacted negatively towards it. But the rally’s not for them. It wasn’t designed to appeal to them. The people that it was designed to appeal to, seemingly liked it.

 

And I think what we need to kind of come to terms with is the fact that this so-called “normie” out there that, is willing to have a grown up conversation about race, but gets turned off if you ever mention Hitler or use a racial slur or something. This person doesn’t actually exist! It’s a totally contrived concept drummed up by over politicised conservatives.

 

Blair Cottrell: Really though? I think they exist in the form of the Boomer. Not all the time, but some older generation people, they close down as soon as you mention Hitler, as soon as you start to become vulgar with terminology that you’re using regarding race. I know Boomers that will shut off instantly with that kind of stuff. So they do exist, I think.

 

Joel Davis: I think the people that shut off with that kind of stuff, they’re also not willing to, they’re shutting off in general, like they’re shutting off towards, … I don’t think people that are really open to a pro-White, like a kind of racist, racialist perspective. I don’t think that there’s a lot of people like that that are also super offended by the N-word or something. I think if you’re offended by the N-word, it’s because you’re actually offended by racism in general, no matter how clean it’s presented to you.

 

And in fact, if you do, what you saw here was, if the banner said “ban blacks not machetes” or “ban Africans not machetes” or something like that, it would have got some traction, but nowhere near as much. It would have been nowhere near as provocative to I think mass audiences. And it wouldn’t have driven a conversation, because what it did is it created this dichotomy in people’s minds of:

 

“How come the system, how come the mainstream media is more concerned about naughty words then they’re concerned about knife crime? They’re concerned about people getting slashed up with machetes, that they’re concerned about you know, incompatible, you know, races being brought into our country en masse.”

 

I’ll just bring Blair back on. Dropped off there as, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Sorry to interrupt. I have this like this hectic new mouse that I bought and it’s got all these buttons on the side and apparently one of those buttons closes the tab that I’ve currently accessed.

 

So I have to be careful not to, or maybe I can programme it so that doesn’t happen. I’ll figure it out. Sorry, please continue.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so what I was saying was is that the use of the N-word, not only did it, basically get more attention as a result, but it also created this dichotomy between how come the system and the mainstream media is more concerned with mean words or offensive speech, than they are with you know, savage violence. And also the ridiculousness of government policy that no one can tell it like it is like machetes don’t produce violent crime you know, violent criminals produce violent crime! And there’s obviously a massive difference, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Africans statistically produce more violent crime as well. Like that is just a statistic fact!

 

05 Why the Fuck Are There Africans in Australia!

top

 

Joel Davis: And why the fuck are there Africans in Australia! Like indeed. The argument for immigration is usually these people come in, they contribute to our society, they work hard, they become doctors, they become, … Africans are not coming in and contributing to our society. They’re bringing with them incredible amounts of crime. These people are coming from war torn backwards countries. They’re savage races. They’re not compatible with Western civilisation.

 

You know, obviously we push back against the arguments made for you know, the benefits of, the so-called benefits, of like Asian immigration or something, but at least they have some kind of argument if you’re looking just through the prism of economics and you don’t think about certain things.

 

But with the African migrants it’s basically impossible to really see what the benefit, supposedly is, of these people coming into our country.

 

[12:15]

 

 

06 Whites Created the Problems in the Rest of the World Through Our Expansionism and Colonialism?

top

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s not on the basis of them being any benefit to our country that they’re brought into the country though. It’s on the basis of I think two things. Human equality, the idea that everyone can be equal if they just experience the same kind of social, opportunities, situation.

 

And also the fact that Africa or African people only live in extreme poverty and experience war conflicts as a result of White colonialism!

 

And so they’re not brought into the country on the basis of its beneficial to us or being beneficial to us, it’s equality, and White people must pay for what they’ve done! So how do we get around that? How do you get around those arguments in the conversation with the standard person when someone brings that up, what’s a nice effective, quick way to respond to that, to shut them down, do you think?

 

Joel Davis: Oh, I think it’s quite simple. Like, number one we are first and foremost responsible to our own people and to ourselves before we have to like, worry about the problems of the rest of the world. Like, it’s not our responsibility to say, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But we created the problems in the rest of the world through our expansionism and colonialism. It’s all our fault!

 

And so now we have the, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s just bullshit!

 

In sub-Saharan Africa they hadn’t even invented the wheel yet when the White man showed up. These people were living in a totally savage, weren’t they?

 

Blair Cottrell: Weren’t the Egyptians black? [chuckling] That’s what some of them think. I’ve seen that online the, …

 

Joel Davis: The pharaoh Akhenaten. Based upon the DNA evidence, do you know which population is most genetically similar to Akhenaten, Blair, in the world today?

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve heard. But remind me, it’s like redheads, isn’t it? Like Germans and redheads.

 

Joel Davis: Well, specifically the Scottish. The Scottish people are the most genetically similar, followed by the Irish.

 

Blair Cottrell: Wow! So there you go.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we waz. We waz [kangz].

 

07 How Irish Are You? Joel and Blair’s Ancestry

top

 

Blair Cottrell: How Irish are you? I think I’m a quarter Irish.

 

Joel Davis: Not that much. I got Ulster Scott in me, but they were from what’s called Northern Irish, but they’re not Irish, they’re Scottish. I’m more Scottish than anything other than English. Like a 50, 50 Scottish English blend. I used to think that there was more Irish in my ancestry because members of my family couldn’t distinguish correctly between northern and southern Irish. And then when I looked into it myself, I verified that.

 

But you can tell by the way I look as well. I think I got more of that look. I don’t have a very Irish look.

 

Blair Cottrell: I also thought I also thought I had more Irish in me than I do, since members of my family couldn’t distinguish between crime and peaceful resolution to conflict! [chuckling] But no, like, we go, okay. The Cottrells do all right. Mostly farmers and butchers is the history of my family. So honest people, hard working, honest people. I’m proud to come from lineage like that.

 

Joel Davis: Were you able to trace yourself back to any convicts?

 

Blair Cottrell: No. I haven’t really looked into it though, to be honest. I haven’t looked into it. My grandmother on my father’s side says that her line goes back to German and she had some evidence of that. I can’t remember what it was. But the name Cottrell often pronounced Cotrel, is from an old Frankish tribe, I think, and first appeared in England during the Norman conquests sometime during the 11th century or after that. So there’s all sorts of European stock from various different places there. English, possibly French, possibly German. We’re just not really sure.

 

08 DNA Labs Selling Your Data to Interested Parties

top

 

So, yeah, it’s all a bit grey. I don’t really go for that DNA testing type stuff. Because I have a friend who knows someone who actually got charged with an offence, a crime, as a result of someone in his family giving their DNA to one of those DNA testing websites, indicating that the testing websites, the people you send the DNA to, they sell your DNA to interested parties, state police, you know, someone growing something in a lab, perhaps. You don’t know what’s happening with your DNA when you hand it into those agencies.

 

So I haven’t done that for that reason. It might be a bit paranoid. Maybe it’s harmless. It’s up to you can do whatever you want, but I don’t really want to spit in a cup and send it through to DNA testing. What about you? Have you done any lineage?

 

09 History of the Name Davis

top

 

Joel Davis: No, I haven’t done the DNA testing, really, going off, tracing lineage. But my grandparents were pretty good at tracing lineage. So we know most of it back most generations. Yeah, people in the comments are saying Davis is Welsh, A, Welsh name. That’s true.

 

But the thing is that when the convention to develop last names came in Britain, which only happened after the Norman Conquest, so that was 1066, and it was brought in through phases in Britain up until about the 13th century, before everyone had a formal last name there or thereabouts.

 

A lot of people who became Davises was just simply because they were the son of David. You know, there was some guy called David who was their dad or their granddad or something. So that actually happened in Scotland and in England as well as in Wales. It wasn’t only in Wales where that happened, which is why, if you look at the commonality of the surname Davis, it’s more common in Britain. Oh, sorry, in England than it is in Wales. And it’s actually even more common in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and America than it is in Britain. And it’s especially common in America.

 

So obviously the Davises, we had a propensity to move when the time came to start settling the new World. So I think it’s like the seventh most common last name in America among American Whites.

 

[18:37]

 

Blair Cottrell: When I went to England, I showed you, I went to one of the oldest cathedrals in England in Winchester, which was the original capital of England before London. I don’t know if it was the official capital, but it was the centre of trade before London became the official capital. And in this cathedral there was like an old book with all of these servicemen, men who had died in service of the Crown. I think it was mostly from the First World War, but when you turned to the page D, DA, there was like 25 or 30 Davises. I noticed more Davises died for England than almost any other surname I could find in the book actually.

 

So, yeah, very popular surname from England.

 

10 Davises in the US Had Slaves Resulting in Niggers Having the Name!

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s a very common name. And yeah, famous Davises include Jefferson Davis, who was the president of the Confederacy of the Confederate States of America.

 

So yeah, we owned a lot of slaves unfortunately in the South. And that has resulted in a lot of niggers. It’s unfortunate for this reason, because we owned a lot of slaves and that has resulted in a lot of niggers in America taking on the Davis name. Why the fuck did we allow blacks to take on the last names of their slave owners? I mean that was. It’s gross! You like watch like the NFL and it’s like “Javante Davis” or some shit! And it’s like, for fuck’s sake! Why do they have our names?

 

Blair Cottrell: But the relationship between families and their slaves I think often was, you know there was relative friendship happening there.

 

And I think both the family and the slaves started really appreciating each other and maybe even the family just became a little too kind to the slaves and that’s how they ended up with the surnames. Or maybe they just kind of adopted those surnames. The slaves, when they were told to write down their name whenever they were becoming, you know, free or legitimate citizens because they couldn’t think of another name to adopt. There’s probably a multitude of reasons.

 

But I know that being a slave in old America didn’t always mean that you were mistreated in any significant way. I mean, sometimes it probably did, but it was sometimes it was just a better alternative to living in the African Wilderness. Right?

 

11 Whites, Jews, Blacks and the Slave Trade

top

 

Joel Davis: One must also remember that we didn’t go around we as in White and I guess a lot of jews were involved in the slave trade, obviously. But we weren’t going around like capturing random wild niggers in the bush of Africa or something. They enslaved their own people and then sold them to us. Right? So, like, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, they didn’t sell them directly to us. They sold them to the jewish merchants who owned the slave ships, who then sold them to us.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! So it’s their shame. Like, if we enslaved our own people and then sold them to niggers that would be our shame. It wouldn’t be their shame.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but we would have the intelligence to take responsibility for it. [chuckling] There’s the difference. Right?

 

12 Instagram and the Very Positive Response to the Ban Niggers Not Machetes Action

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But let me show you guys this.

 

So, I was on, scrolling around. I have a burner Instagram account, which I don’t really use Instagram, I just have a burner account for when people send me shit!

 

Blair Cottrell: Really? You should use Instagram more. You strike me as a real Instagram kind of guy. Not really!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, maybe I should because I’m banned from everything else, maybe I should give Instagram a go. So there’s this account.

 

Blair Cottrell: Apparently, before you continue. Instagram is popping off at the moment, I’ve heard like all the memes. Like, there’s a lot more free speech allowed on there than there was before. I think Zuckerberg’s worried about being cut out of the social media capital because I’ve heard reports that it’s actually pretty based. But I don’t know how the true that is in practice. I’ll have to jump on and use it a bit more myself and find out.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I heard that a lot of nationalist accounts who were doing well on Instagram from Europe and from America, were all recently banned in a big ban wave. And they’ve nipped that slightly in the bud recently, but, …

 

Blair Cottrell: I haven’t heard about that, so maybe I’m wrong.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, we should definitely probably try and make hay while the sun shines on Instagram while we’re banned from X.

 

So this is like just some random Instagram that’s got like less than 2,000 followers. Quick World. Never heard of this before. They just post random news clips, right? And then I was scrolling through and the news clips, they get like 2,000, 3,000 views, if that they posted the clip of the Ban Niggers Not Machetes banner [by NSN] action. 1.9 million views!

 

And then the comments, I was scrolling through every single comment. You know how they show like the top comments that get a lot of likes at the top.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Every single comment was positive! Look at some of these:

 

“A White man so-called hateful rally is 1 million percent more peaceful than a BLM rally. Hahaha!”

 

“So for years we get black riots with participants burning the nation’s flag, screaming black pride, and often committing acts of violence targeting Whites. But this is a disturbing display of pure hate hatred?”

 

This is how normal people are reacting. Right. I got more here, let me pull more up.

 

“I mean, they’re not wrong. No, they’re 100% correct this time. You conveniently left out the fact that they were protesting because four African teenagers threatened a 15 year old boy with a machete. Maybe give all the people the facts before making a biassed post!”

 

You know, it just goes on and on, these kinds of comments. It was incredible to see because I thought, okay, this rally is pretty controversial. I’m sure it, some people will love it, but it will it’s pretty provocative. I was surprised at how supportive a lot of these reactions were, scrolling through social media.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, me too.

 

Joel Davis: At the beginning you were telling me this is just going to upset normies and no one’s going to like this kind of thing. Maybe you don’t understand normies? Maybe normies are actually more based than you first realised?

 

[24:46]

 

 

13 Discussion on the Effective Use of the N-Word and Media Response

top

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s not just that, but I think people don’t always understand the purpose behind it. I mean, correct me if I’m wrong because it wasn’t my idea, but it’s sort of a tactical thing when you drop the N-word like that in a public way. Because it’s an effort, I suppose, to force government officials to react to what you’re doing and thereby demonstrate that they’re more offended, or taking the N-word more seriously than they are violent knife crime. It’s like it’s worse to hold up a banner with that word written on it apparently, than it is to assault someone with a machete in a public shopping centre in broad daylight in front of families and so forth.

 

It’s like that banner has essentially caused more outrage in the political and media class than the knife crime itself. Which is one of the reasons that you use that phrase. Right? You put that phrase on the banner to demonstrate for the public. Because the public don’t like that they don’t like it when there’s an obvious problem that isn’t being addressed for ideological reasons. And that’s what gets people on side. That’s Why I think the public is on your side, regardless of the slur. Because there’s obviously ideological problems. There’s a double standard being employed here.

 

Joel Davis: And that’s why it was a tactical use. Because if there’s a lot of situations where it’s a bit much maybe to drop the N-word, right? But sometimes it’s not a bit much. Sometimes it’s manifestly appropriate. And this is a situation where it is because when you’re talking about blacks running around with machetes, slicing people up in shopping malls, that’s nigger behaviour! What could be more nigger behaviour than that? That’s the exact reason why we have a slur like that for these people. So you know, it makes sense to drop a word like that.

 

And then you see a reaction where Leftists, non-Whites, who have contempt for White people, the system, all these people show so much concern about the use of a word on a banner at 3 o’ clock in the morning when no one got hurt, no one attacked anyone. It was just a video of guys holding a banner at the front of a shopping centre at 3 AM. This apparently is the most horrible thing ever! It’s so horrible! It puts everything in perspective for a lot of people. Like, hey, wait a second. And now you’ve got a sympathetic audience, a sympathetic receptacle for your N-word. Now your N-word can have a lot of potency and power because it really radicalises the conversation, enforces a conversation that otherwise wouldn’t be happening.

 

I mean, look at this. This is Daily Mail, Australia’s TikTok, right? I took this screenshot yesterday. I’m sure it has more views now. You see here I was scrolling through some of the TikToks get a lot of views. Like one here’s got half a million views. This one, 300 something thousand, 50,000.

 

 

Look at the one of the rally, though:

 

“Sickening scenes in Melbourne as White supremacists descend on Shopping Centre.”

 

7.1 million views! Right? I looked on the metrics on The Noticer. It was the biggest post the notice has made you know, this month, most traction and they’re putting out news every day. Comfy Friend posted, a clip of it. It was like one of the most viral things he’s posted. You know, it got incredible amounts of traction. I don’t think he’s got anything more viral than that all year. Why is it so interesting to people? If it’s bad activism obviously it’s good activism.

 

So that’s the thing. It’s like, apparently it’s the rule:

 

“Oh, you can’t use language like that!”

 

But, maybe it’s about trying to find the appropriate way to use language like that. Like controversy is a weapon. And now we’ve forced all of these the politicians to not only talk about the issue but also, very explicitly racialise the issue and show how, the anti-racist ideology is preventing anyone from stating the obvious and trying to come up with the only obvious solution, which is it doesn’t matter whether you ban machetes. If you’ve got a bunch of Sudanese refugees living in your city, they’re going to be engaging in violent crimes. You know, home invasions are happening every other day.

 

14 Sudanese in Pakenham Attacking White High School Kids at Party

top

 

The same night that this happened, by the way, there were a bunch of Sudanese in Pakenham, which is in southeastern Melbourne. They jumped the back fence into some some high school kids party and started bashing, filming themselves by the way, bashing all the White kids, saying:

 

“Oh, Sudanese things, just Sudanese things!”

 

And they’re like beating them up and taking their shoes, taking their phone, taking their wallet and they’re posting it online like:

 

“Haha, how funny is this? We’re just bashing White kids and taking all their shit!”

 

[29:34]

 

Blair Cottrell: What area was this in Pakenham?

 

Joel Davis: Packenham.

 

Blair Cottrell: Probably the White kids are like significantly outnumbered in Pakenham, I could imagine. Pakenham is a suburb in southeastern Melbourne, like inland suburb that is just notorious for being inundated with immigrants. A lot of immigrants, a lot of black immigrants, Indians. It’s just somewhere that most Australians don’t want to go anymore.

 

15 Machete Fight at Northland Shopping Centre

top

 

Joel Davis: Mm. But like in Melbourne you, home invasions are through the roof! Every single crime metric is through the roof! And every other day there’s some new story of blacks having a machete fight or running through someone’s house. And this machete fight, we talked about it last week at Northland Shopping Centre. The only reason that it was brought to a heel was because of a random White pedestrian, White shoppers.

 

Blair Cottrell: A random White guy. And isn’t that symbolic of the real solution to this entire problem, is that’s that standalone working class White male. The White male is the only real effective solution to this problem. The White male that is no longer afraid to just stand up and provide that physical, immediate solution. Without that guy willing to do that, then there isn’t any sort of effective solution. There’s just bureaucracy and excuses. So I found that really symbolic.

 

16 Magistrates in Victoria Are Being Trained in Diversity and Inclusion to Go Easy on Immigrants

top

 

Joel Davis: That’s the thing as well sthe only reason that we can’t solve this problem is because White guys don’t want to get thrown in jail. Because if we were to do something serious about this problem, the system would come down hard on us.

 

Meanwhile, the story was out in the Noticer earlier this year. It has come out in other mainstream outlets. It has come out that the magistrates in Melbourne or in Victoria are being trained by diversity and inclusion, whatever types, to make sure that they lower the sentencing against refugees immigrants and so on, to prevent them from getting deported when they commit violent crimes.

 

Blair Cottrell: So these magistrates would be smarter to realise, …

 

Joel Davis: These blacks are doing, like, home invasions, putting machetes to the throats of innocent families at 2 o’ clock in the morning, taking their car keys and taking their TV and their laptops, whatever. And the magistrates are being trained not to deport them, not to give them a jail sentence longer than one year, which would trigger them getting deported.

 

So then basically, they all know that even if they get caught, it’s a small holiday in prison at worst. So they’ve got no disincentive not to keep behaving like this. They know that they can just take the piss. Whereas if we rose up against them and put them in their place, they’d throw the book at us! Like, forget about it.

 

Not only are the police, and I don’t necessarily blame the police for this because it’s you know, their hands are tied. But the system! Not only is the system not enforcing the law correctly in order to deal with the problem, bringing them in the first place, which there’s no reason to bring them in, that makes any sense.

 

Secondly, not enforcing the law properly so that they basically feel emboldened to behave like this. Third, the they will actively destroy the lives and punish harshly anyone in the community who tries to put a stop to it ourselves.

 

And so they’ve created the problem, at all three levels.

 

Blair Cottrell: You think if you’re a magistrate, you’d be smart enough to realise that you’re being taken for a ride when you’re being put through a diversity and inclusion brainwashing process. You know, magistrates aren’t stupid people. You know, they’ve been in law quite a while. They’ve well I can only assume they’re not stupid people, but maybe they’re just so keen on keeping their position, keeping their their job as a magistrate that they’ll do whatever they have to do.

 

That’s the problem as well, isn’t it? It’s money, money, cowardice and the comfort of a minister’s chair or something like that.

 

17 The Problem of Anti-Racism Being Championed by Whites

top

 

But you were saying earlier, you were remarking on being surprised by how much support you were mustering up from regular people in response to a banner which would in times hitherto have just been considered vulgar and perhaps would actually just cause public uproar. And so isn’t that interesting though how The Times are changing and I think people are just angry. They’re angry enough to not even care about that word. They’re angry enough to support whoever is standing up against this, regardless of what kind of language they’re using, because people just want to see results. And that’s notable because the primary force or the sort of people who champion anti-racism are White people. White people are the reason anti-racism exists! Without naive, obsequious White people who are obsessed with feeling good about themselves, we wouldn’t have anti-racism.

 

But now we’re seeing this phenomena where many White people are sick of that. Many White people are turning their backs on anti-racism because they’re just interested in seeing results. If they have to be racist in order to see those results, so be it. They don’t care. And that’s exciting man. I’m excited to see where that future leads.

 

[35:11]

 

 

18 Upcoming Communist Anti-Nazi Rally at Northland Shopping Centre

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah it’s going to be interesting too because tomorrow, there’s some follow up stories about this shopping centre in Preston, in North Melbourne called Northland. Number one there’s going to be a communist organised rally tomorrow at the shops. An anti-Nazi rally because we held up a banner that said nigger on it. I wasn’t there, of course I wasn’t there! But, you know, members of the Org, members of the NSN allegedly were there.

 

And so they’re going to have an anti-Nazi rally. That’s going to be interesting. I wonder if that’s going to make the news. What kind of freaks are going to show up to that? I saw they said “trans folk and refugees welcome”. So I don’t know why the trannies are getting lumped in that.

 

[Image: The anti-Nazi Rally that took place on Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at Northland shopping centre Preston, Melbourne.]

 

Blair Cottrell: They’ll be destroyed. They’ll be destroyed! They’ll be de-legitimized by their own optics. So let them do it.

 

19 Meat Cleavers Being Carried as a Weapon

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, I hope we get some footage because it sounds like an absolute freak show!

 

And then also yesterday we had a story where someone was arrested at Northlands because they were wielding a meat cleaver as a weapon.

 

So the machete ban doesn’t seem to be going too well. They’re just moving on to meat cleavers now. So I wonder if they’re going to ban meat cleavers? I don’t know what the butchers are going to do. Say goodbye to your Scotch fillets because they won’t be able to chop them up anymore. Going to have to just buy the whole cow, basically, and just kind of gnaw it, because meat cleavers are probably going to be made illegal next.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s at the discretion of police when they bring in a ban like this. Like, if police see you carrying a meat cleaver on public transport obviously they’re going to take that from you. But if you’re using a meat cleaver as a butcher, I think you’re going to be okay. I know that you’re making a joke. Maybe I’m just being autistic. But yeah.

 

20 Machetes Useful When Going on Bushwalks

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I am making a joke, but that was already the case about machetes. But apparently they’ve got to ban them, so you can’t buy a machete at Bunnings [similar to Home Depot]. Say you want to go on a bushwalk a machete is very useful if you’re going off the beaten track to, basically slice your way through vegetation and so on. Because I don’t know if you guys have ever been on a bushwalk at home, or a forest walk or whatever you Americans call it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Walk through the woods.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. When you get off the path, and you’re kind of having to kind of crawl your way through shrubs and so on it becomes exhausting. Your arms get all sliced up. Having a machete just to hack through it makes your life so much easier.

 

So now we can no longer hack through vegetation without a special licence. I wonder how you get your machete licence? I don’t even know even how it works.

 

Blair Cottrell: You can’t even walk through a lot of bushland in Australia at all anymore. There’s this weird situation going on where certain lands and public parks. I don’t know what they’re called. They’re like National Parks. I think they’re called, which means they’re like public property, but they’re being closed off due to some Aboriginal heritage or Land Rights Act.

 

And apparently there’s dozens of National Parks all across the country that the government’s closed access to. And some of them are major tourist attractions. So people come to this country to walk through certain regions and see various landscapes and they can’t do it because of Aboriginal rights or something like that. But that’s a different subject to explore entirely. I saw this in a video recently. But I think there might be something deeper going on there. Perhaps the government is selling that land to private enterprise for some specific purpose. I don’t know. But I’ve got to look into it. If anyone knows anything about that, send me some details because I’m interested.

 

21 Calling Whites ‘Cum Skins’ as a Slur

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I see that there’s some seething! I don’t know if they’re a nigger, or a pajeet, but something like that, in the comments. I see the moderators have taken them out, but he called us “come skins”. I find that to be an interesting insult. Apparently this is an anti-White insult. Because of course we call them shit skins. I’d much rather be the come skin than the shit skin because you are refuse! But we’re the seed of life, you know. We’re the seed of life. So of all the kind of bodily fluids to identify with, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s virtually impossible to be offended by a racial slur if you’re White. [chuckling] Because it’s like being White is, it’s great to be White! It’s not a problem. Point it out in any way that you think is derogatory. And it’s just funny to us. [chuckling] You can’t get offended by racial slurs unless you don’t like yourself. Because someone’s pointing out your race to you and you’re trying to deny and cope with your own racial identity that you don’t like. And so you’re offended because someone’s pointing out a reality that you’re trying not to acknowledge, Right? So all you got to do is like yourself and suddenly racism is funny.

 

22 Blacks Are ‘Offended’ by ‘Nigger’ Because It Gives Them Power

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, that’s a thing with blacks too. Like if blacks, blacks already kind of 50% owned the word nigger because they turned it into like cool. You know, they got it in like rap music and they’re like, “what’s up my nigger?” And so on. And all it is like Latin for black etymologically. Like it’s nothing to even be offended by if they would just chill with everyone calling them niggers too, and like:

 

“Oh, yeah, I’m a, you’re a White guy, or whatever.”

 

It would have no potency, would have zero potency. It’s only got potency because they’re offended by it. Now they also pretend to be offended by it because it gives them power. They get to be a victim and it authorises them to commit acts of violence and aggression towards Whites.

 

And so they’ve charged it for their own hate, for the purposes of their own hatred. That’s very important to remember. The only reason why blacks get offended by the word is because they hate White people. And they want to be able to develop some kind of excuse by creating this kind of fake moral conundrum. They want to be able to create a way, a pretext, to express their racial hatred.

 

[41:04]

 

23 Average Aussies Males Don’t Like People Claiming to Be ‘Offended’

top

 

Blair Cottrell: They still want to be accepted by us as well. It’s like they don’t like us, but they also want to be treated as equals at the same time. So I don’t know what’s going on there. It’s kind of something to do with an inferiority complex, I think. But I don’t know. All I know, though, is if you’re offended by something, if you’re getting worked up about something, Australians, they’re going to keep doing whatever it is that offends you. They’re going to keep developing that line, they’re going to keep poking the bear and they’re gonna take the piss any way they can.

 

So this is not the kind of place where in social situations, being offended doesn’t really hold any weight down here in Australia. The government tries hard to make it a thing and the media’s on board, obviously.

 

But I think one of the reasons the standard working class Australian tends to still have pretty based perspectives is because it’s when you’re offended down here, it doesn’t mean anything. In a typical social situation, people just laugh at you. That’s a good thing!

 

24 They’re Trying to Make Being an Aussie ‘Bloke’ Illegal

top

 

Joel Davis: That’s how it works in a normal Australian friend group. Like, if you get offended by something, everyone will keep bullying you until you realise that you’re getting bullied because you’re offended.

 

Like if you just bantered back, then you wouldn’t be targeted. Yeah, it’s just until you realise that you’re making yourself a “victim” and then that produces a social space free of “soft cuntism”, basically, as Jacob Hersant calls it. That’s normal Australian, you know, particularly male relations.

 

And yeah, obviously they’re trying to make being a bloke illegal. Australia used to be all about being a bloke. It used to be about, drive a V8, get on the piss, do doies [donuts], send it, have a farm, you know, say what you want, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe an occasional race riot on the beach!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And they’re trying to make being Australian illegal. That’s what they’re trying to do. Because a bunch of faggot communists and seething ingrates in charge.

 

25 a Conspiracy to Make Aussies into a Mongrel Slave Race

top

 

Blair Cottrell: You can’t bully Aussies, can you? You can’t turn Australians into slaves, into a slave class. That’s why they’re trying to get rid of us. They want to replace us with a more manageable population they can bully, push around, force them to live in little McMansions and cubicles, force them to work 16 hours a day. You can’t do that to Aussies! They’re not going to play that game. And that’s what it all comes down to I think it’s about replacing us with a slave race, with a mongrel slave race. And that conspiracy, I think, is the most outstanding one! It’s the one that’s at the centre of all other conspiracies.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But also a lot of the people who want to convert us into a slave race are themselves already members of it. They’re trying to drag us down to their level. That’s the other thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Misery loves company, bro! Misery loves company!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. That’s all these freaks that are going to show up to the shops tomorrow to do their anti-Nazi protest. They’re basically the dregs of society that want to drag everyone down to their level.

 

26 the Miserable Mentality of Leftist Freaks

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Can you imagine the sort of things people like that talk about in private? Can you imagine the threshold of conversations like you wouldn’t be able to say anything that you’re actually thinking. All you’d be able to do is like, give shit to Nazis and talk about what a good person you are for standing up for minorities. You know, talk about the Arab style scarf that you just got given by Socialist Alternative rally on the weekend. What a boring shit life! [chuckling] It’s like, I can’t even visualise it, man! I don’t. Sorry for doing it to you. If you’re thinking about it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, they. It’s basically just a misery convention where they all get together and talk about how victimised they are and how all the different mental illnesses they have and you know, no one’s allowed to make any jokes that offend anyone. They just morally police each other all the time. It seems horrible.

 

When I was younger, I did associate with people who are ideologically Leftist in certain situations. And I never lasted long because I just offended them because I can’t help myself, I’m me! I’m an edge lord, you know, naturally. So it never worked out. But which is good. I mean, that’s obviously just natural. I don’t belong with them.

 

27 Blair’s Encounter as a Teenager at a Marxist Convention with Fat Lesbians

top

 

Blair Cottrell: So I found, I found them first as well. Like I’ve told the story a couple of times. Went to a Marxist convention when I was 18 because they were some of the first posters I saw. The posters they used to spread around Melbourne had a slogan on them saying “ideas to challenge the system”. You know, I was an edgy teenager. So, yeah:

 

“I don’t like the system. Let’s go meet these people and see what they’re talking about. No, man, not my clan at all!”

 

Wasn’t a single other working class person there. It was just all of these very overweight lesbian looking women glaring at me as though I was the enemy. And I’m like:

 

“Hey, I’m just here because we don’t like the system, right? Or hang on, these people kind of are the system. These are the exact, this is our problem right here. I’m thinking.”

 

So, [chuckling] yeah, it’s like a fake resistance. I determined it was kind of like a fake resistance that exists to possibly catch people like me and steer them in the wrong direction to essentially neutralise someone who could potentially join a revolutionary, a real revolutionary force.

 

[46:36]

 

28 Ted Kaczynski Summed up Leftism Pretty Well

top

 

Joel Davis: I think Ted Kaczynski summed up Leftism pretty well. His assessment is that:

 

“Leftists are people who are upset with the system or not embodying its own values purely enough. So they’re not revolutionaries. They don’t oppose the values of the system. They support the system so much that they’re upset with the system for not being more systemy than it actually is!”

 

So like that’s what they’re all saying. They’re like:

 

“Oh, look at the White privilege of these men standing in balaclavas at 3 AM! How come they weren’t arrested?”

 

They, probably weren’t arrested because it’s impossible to tell who the fuck they are because they’re covering up their identity because the anti-White system would arrest them and try to throw them in prison otherwise!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, but what the Leftists want is for like 30 likely suspects to be rounded up at random and, executed out in the Woods for social justice! Maybe they’d be happy with that, but probably that still complain that it didn’t happen fast enough. [chuckling] I don’t know, man!

 

I mean, that’s what’s, that’s how crazy things can get though. Like, history proves that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but that’s what they are.

 

I mean, these Leftists, they’re totally, entirely dependent upon the system as individuals. They they’re on all kinds of like, medications. A lot of them are on disability benefits or Centerlink. You know, these people are not independent people that don’t need like a large bureaucracy to prop up their lives. You know, they need to go and see like mental health professionals and they need all this support! Right. I think they advocate for, is making everyone feel included and supported and having more government programmes to take care of everyone. They call themselves “anarchists”. It’s the most un-Anarchistic position you could possibly have! They can’t have enough government. They want to turn everything into a democracy. They want everything in society to be this big bureaucratic voting committee procedure where, that’s their ideal. They don’t want to be left alone.

 

29 Marcus Follin Said That ‘Dysgenics is the Only Reason Leftism Still Exists’.

top

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d have more empathy for them if they weren’t so self contradictory, if they weren’t literally representing the opposite of what they claim to represent. It’s wild that people can come to that manner of existence.

 

But look, in summary, Marcus Follin [aka the Golden One] said that:

 

“Dysgenics is the only reason Leftism still exists.”

 

It’s just dysgenic. It’s bad genetics, bad blood, too much drugs, too much of that victim psychology that comes along with just being genetically deficient. And like, you can’t really get past that summary. I don’t think that’s a good summary. Wraps it all up.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah! Fair enough. Is there anything else to say about this particular subject? I mean everyone knows, everyone who’s an Australian at the very least knows about the problems with African crime. There’s not much point going over it again. I mean, it’s important to reiterate it to the public.

 

But you know, we all know about it and we cover it on the show all the time.

 

But yeah, it was interesting to see. I think the, it’s more the reaction to the banner and how it was received by different groups of people that I found more interesting to be honest than anything else.

 

30 A Non-White Reaction to the Ban Niggers Not Machetes Video

top

 

Blair Cottrell: I wanted to remark on a reaction video I saw that, a woman filmed. The woman was not White.

 

Joel Davis: Do you have it? I can play it.

 

Blair Cottrell: No, I don’t. I saw it in some chat on Telegram and I’m in so many different chats that people add me to, I can’t remember which one it was. But I remember some of what she said. She was clearly very upset, wasn’t White by anyone’s standards. I don’t know what she was though. She kind of looked maybe slightly African and, I don’t even know. But she was quite wide eyed in the video here and there, like kind of crazy eyed! But there was something she said I found interesting. She demanded that:

 

“Other people need to call this out!”

 

Sure, she said the police should arrest these guys and investigate and blah blah, blah. But she said:

 

“Other people must call this out!”

 

And I thought, isn’t that peculiar? Whenever someone who’s not White feels discriminated against, targeted by racism, they appeal to other White people to come to their aid. It’s like they feel like they can’t even help themselves. They require the White champions of anti-racism to storm in and save the day! And it brings me back to what I was saying before. What happens when those anti-racists no longer exist within the White community? What happens when White people actually start to become ethnically conscious and realise they’re just losing out as a result of this equality worldview? That anti-racism is actually just against their collective ethnic interests. It works against them in every way! You know what happens then? It’s like when all these non-White people are complaining about racism, it basically just dies out, doesn’t it? The whole thing dies out.

 

I mean what do you think? Why do you, why do you think they do that? Why do you think they appeal to White people whenever they experience discrimination? Why can’t they deal with it themselves? Why can’t they come up with some resolution as a result of their own thinking?

 

[52:09]

 

31 Why Non-Whites Call On Whites When They Experience ‘Discrimination’

top

 

Joel Davis: Well, because they know that they’re in our country. And, if White people en masse basically saw our position as legitimate and joined with us in our cause their position in our country becomes precarious. So they need, …

 

Blair Cottrell: It just occurred to me, maybe she was. I’m kind of just thinking while I’m listening and thinking back to the video as well. Maybe she was afraid? Maybe it wasn’t just anger in her eyes that I saw, but fear as well. Maybe she thought that the fact that banner drop happened, it might be a sign that White people aren’t as anti-racist as they were before and therefore her presence in our country isn’t as secure as she once previously believed? Maybe it’s kind of like a fear reaction, a self preservation thing. Like:

 

“Come on guys, we need to call this out. We can’t let this become the norm or I won’t be able to live here anymore. Fuck!”

 

Maybe it’s something like that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, it’s basically that she’s obviously showing her anxiety. You told a story about when you’re in jail and I thought that was pertinent. Where you were talking about how there was like some non-White guy. This is years ago, when you’re in prison, like before you became so ideological.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s a good story.

 

32 Blair’s Prison Story About a Nepalese Taking Advantage of His Kindness

top

 

Joel Davis: I mean, you should tell the story. It’s your story.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m like 22, I think. And, I’m almost done serving my prison sentence in Port Phillip Prison. And this new guy comes in. He’s Nepalese, from Nepal. Tiny little guy. Like he had a man’s face with stubble, but on the body of like an 8 year old boy by our standards. I couldn’t believe how small he was. And he looked like he hadn’t eaten a good meal in weeks.

 

And a little while later I was cooking some eggs. Used to cook eggs on a sandwich press, like on a toasted sandwich maker because we didn’t have anything else to cook on. So you just fire that up, cook your eggs on that. And I was cooking like 10 eggs. I used to buy a maximum amount of eggs you’re allowed to buy as a prisoner, which was three dozen a week. And he walked by and I signalled to him and I gave him some eggs just because he looked so skinny! It was almost irritating me. I’m like:

 

“Get some food into your mate. You look like you need a good meal!”

 

Problem is though he didn’t see it as a random act of kindness. I didn’t realise it at the time, but he saw it as a weakness! He looked at me a certain way and then every day after that he just asked me for more eggs and other stuff too! More than once actually.

 

After that I noticed him looking into my cell as he walked past, seeing what else I had, seeing what he could get out of me. And then a group of Arabs, I saw this happen. They pulled him into a cell, tied him to a toilet and kicked the shit out of him. Probably for no reason. That happens in jail sometimes.

 

And I remember this because I was sitting down while this was happening, a few cells down, I could hear it happening. And he was shouting my name! He was shouting. He couldn’t say my name properly because English was his second language. He was saying “Blaira”. Screaming at the top of his lungs, “Blaira, Blaira”. And they were laughing at him. I could hear them laughing at him, saying:

 

“He’s not going to help you.”

 

And I thought to myself:

 

“What does he expect? Does he expect me to charge in there and take on a pack of wild Arabs like it’s a fucking Bollywood movie?”

 

Like, I realised that just by doing one nice thing for this guy, he just expected me to fall all over myself after that, to come to his aid to protect him and to provide him with whatever else he could get out of me.

 

And I realised, this is a great lesson here. I realised that some people, particularly people of the brown distinction, they don’t see kindness as kindness, they see it as naive weakness! And they just try to leverage more out of you perpetually. And isn’t that a good lesson? Or wouldn’t that be a good lesson for our politicians to learn? Because what are the people coming to this country doing? They’re not grateful for being allowed to come into the country in the first place. They’re not seeing it as an amazing opportunity like the Greeks and the Italians did. They’re not working their asses off to do the best they can for their families. Not all of them, not by a long shot. They’re thinking:

 

“Ha! What a bunch of idiots! What else can I get out of these morons? Oh, I can get housing, I can get welfare, I can get special rights because I’m not White and I’m oppressed! I come from war torn country. Wow, these people are really fucking stupid! What else can I get out of them?”

 

And it just never ends, right? So when you’re kind, when someone’s nice to you, when you’re a White person, right, you think to yourself, great, and you make the most out of the opportunity. You’re thankful for it, but you move on. You don’t keep asking for more. You don’t see kindness as weakness. You just understand that it’s a random act of kindness. Because White people are like that. They’re randomly kind because they just empathise with someone in that situation. In the moment. But it doesn’t mean that you can take advantage.

 

And I don’t know, I thought that was a good story to demonstrate that a lot of people out there who aren’t like us, you shouldn’t show kindness to them. You shouldn’t be so nice to them because they just take advantage of it. They actually just see you as stupid or weak for being nice. Maybe I could have told that story better.

 

[57:30]

 

 

Joel Davis: No, you told the story very well. The word kindness, it’s got the, like, etymologically, it means treating someone as your kin, as your kinsman or kinswoman. It means treating someone like family. Well, these people aren’t your fucking family! Stop treating them like that. They’re taking the piss. I mean, it’s pretty obvious. But that’s how non-Whites think. I was thinking about this today as well, when I was thinking about why it is that, I guess I don’t know where Blair went. I guess we’ll be back soon.

 

33 Elon Musk Admired by Merchant Minded Indian and Asians

top

 

When I was thinking about how come it seems like Asians and Indians, like really respect Elon Musk, whereas White people I find even if, you know, Elon Musk has done things over the last couple years that some of the things that he’s done, people like us have liked. Some of the things that he’s done, we haven’t liked. Right. But he’s been a mixed bag the last couple of years.

 

You know, he’s throwing Romans. He partially restored our guys to Twitter, at least for a period of time. You know, he played to the pro-White thing a little bit. But he doesn’t really seem to be respected overall by people in our group, because everyone can kind of smell, White people can smell that he’s got an agenda, that he’s disingenuous in some way. That because he’s a billionaire! He’s one of the richest men in the world. We don’t trust this guy.

 

Blair Cottrell: No one gets that, … [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! Everyone knows that he’s obviously got an angle that is that there’s a disingenuous angle. Everyone can smell it. Every normal White person could smell it. Left-wing or Right-wing, everyone can smell it!

 

Whereas Asians and Indians, they all think that he’s, like, amazing! Because they’re merchant races. So to them:

 

“Wow, look at how rich and successful he is. And look at all of his companies!”

 

In Australia, when you see a Tesla, you will almost never see a White person driving it. I know in America a lot of Leftists before Elon switched teams, a lot of Leftist Whites were driving Teslas as a status symbol. And that happened a little bit here. But predominantly, if you see a Tesla, it’s a fucking Indian or an Asian driving it in Australia.

 

Blair Cottrell: I have noticed that.

 

Joel Davis: Because they get sucked in by it because he’s like this rock star merchant. But we’re not a mercantile race. It doesn’t jive with us in the same way. These people think differently. It’s the same.

 

34 Indians and Asians Obsessed with Ways to Make and Spend Money

top

 

I’ve said this before whenever I’ve worked with Indians and Asians, and then it’s been like the lunch break or something and was we’re talking just about you know, making conversation, making small talk. What I have found is that all they want to talk about is ways to make money and ways to spend money:

 

“Oh, I’ve got a good deal here. Oh, what do you think about crypto? Which crypto-currencies do you think are good? Oh, have you got a good bet on the cricket? Blah, blah!”

 

It’s all just like, ways of how to exchange m, you know, mercantile information with one another about ways in which we can make money or spend money more efficiently. That’s their entire fixation. When I talk with White people, yeah, those subjects come up occasionally, but generally speaking, it gets into something with a bit more depth in terms of like philosophy on family or life history or our perspective, our values, whatever, right? Music, art, something like that. But I’ve never been able to have much of a conversation about any of these subjects with an Indian or an Asian because they’re soulless!

 

Blair Cottrell: With the merchant brain it doesn’t really matter how you’ve achieved the success, how you own the companies, how you have the capital. What matters is that you’ve got it! You know what I mean? There’s no, like there’s less of a moral compass. It’s just about success for the sake of success, and that’s it. That’s good enough for the merchant. That’s the way they think.

 

35 More on the Nepalese Guy in Prison

top

 

And in regards to the story about the Nepalese guy, by the way, like, if you might be saying:

 

“Oh, that poor guy, he got beat up by people for no reason. Why didn’t you help him, Blair?”

 

Uh you got to understand, this guy’s in jail. I actually heard about this guy’s story. He was an immigrant on a working visa. He was doing an apprenticeship as a chef under an Australian citizen, and he stabbed the head chef! He stabbed an Australian citizen. So he’s in jail for that. Then he was going to be deported when he finished his sentence. So like there’s a reason he’s in jail, being tied to a toilet and having the shit kicked out of him by a group of Arabs. That’s because God wills it! That’s fate. [chuckling] That’s what happens if you come to this country, you’re not from this country, and you stab a citizen in this country. So like, don’t think that I’m in some position where I’m a noble protector of people who are being beaten up. And you should never think the same about yourself either. You see some guy getting stomped on the street, you have to understand that sometimes he’s put himself in that position and it’s happening for a reason.

 

So if you don’t know someone that’s happening to, or it’s not really your business, you stay out of it! That’s kind of the position I would take generally.

 

[1:02:37]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but if it’s a White guy and there’s a pack of nons, particularly if you’re out with the boys, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You read the situation, …

 

Joel Davis: You gotta back your boy. I mean, that’s happened. I’ve been out with the boys quite a few times, and there’s been a White guy getting picked on by a pack of non-Whites. And, the non-Whites picked on the wrong White, like, at the wrong time, because a pack of Nazis just happened to be there and sort it out.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, [chuckling] it can happen. Yeah. No, like I said. Anyway, it’s quite obvious when someone is being targeted unfairly, is being stood over, is being bullied, that kind of thing.

 

36 NSN Promo Clip

top

 

Joel Davis: I’m getting a message from NSN HQ Beaming into my headset. Apparently a new hype edit just dropped. Haven’t even seen this edit. I’m gonna play it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Let’s watch it. Let’s watch and get a raw reaction to it.

 

Joel Davis: Let’s hit it!

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Who makes those, bro? That’s fucking cool! If I was 19, 18, I would join straight away! I mean, put yourself in the position of a young guy growing up in the current conditions, societal conditions. You’re going to join that every time! Whoever sees that and who has any balls left at all is going to join. That’s good stuff. It’s good content.

 

37 On Why You Should Join the Org

top

 

Joel Davis: Imagine, imagine not joining us!

 

Like if you’re an Aussie, you’re a young White dude, even like a middle aged White dude. Join the fucking Org! Like, come on, like be a man, join the clan! You know, fucking hell, like what else are you going to do? What else are you doing? We’re all gonna die! You know, someone close to me died recently. It’s the first time a close member of my family has died so so far in my life and makes you reflect upon, just how quick and short life is and how you got to make it count because who knows, you get hit by a bus tomorrow, who knows?

 

But even if you have a full innings, it’s not that fucking long, you know, it blows, it goes quick and you gotta make it count! You gotta make sure that the time that you do have, you invest it in something worthwhile. And there’s been too many lives wasted amongst our people over recent decades. Too much nihilism, too much individualism in our people are just blowing through their lives on entertainment and trivial matters and you know, trying to make money and just shit that ultimately doesn’t really matter. I’m not saying that you shouldn’t be trying to make money and have a successful career but you know, what really matters, what really matters obviously is your family and your nation legacy that you’re leaving behind, the people that you love and that you care about your people and that’s all that really fucking matters. Everything else is secondary.

 

So you know, join the fucking tribe that’s going to put up a resistance to the genocide of our people for fuck sake. Like whatever else that you’re doing is significantly less important.

 

And it’s fucking fine, like we have a fucking great time! So yeah, join the Org, White Australia.org. You can join as a supporter. But if you want to join as a member, get on Telegram, message White Ausbot. That’s WHITE AUSBOT at White Ausbot on Telegram and get vetted and join the Org.

 

Blair Cottrell: I realised we just had an ad break, a really cool ad break. Like most streams you would get some gay product like you know, “men’s beard straighteners” or something like that! [chuckling] But in this one you get, we interrupt this stream to bring you exclusive new hype edit, Join the Nazi gang! [chuckling]

 

38 Succulent Chinese Meal – Democracy Manifest Guy

top

 

Joel Davis: Oh, yeah! By the way, did you see that thing that Tom posted on Telegram just before we went live here? He got a screenshot from everyone surely knows the:

 

“This is democracy manifest!”

 

You know, that guy, the very famous, he was eating a succulent Chinese meal in King’s Cross [Sydney’s old red light area]. I think this was back in the 90s. And he was arrested and it’s a viral clip. Maybe I should pull it up. Surely everyone’s seen that it’s such a famous meme! Such a famous meme. You know it Blair, surely?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Like the guy getting carried out of the restaurant?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you know the story behind that? The story behind that I, as I heard it is this guy was just travelling around Melbourne eating like really fancy restaurants. I mean, just walking out. So he was getting free dinners every night.

 

Joel Davis: It wasn’t him though.

 

Blair Cottrell: It wasn’t him?

 

Joel Davis: No, no, no! So it was in Sydney. It was in King’s Cross in Sydney. And it was a case of mistaken identity.

 

There was a guy that was doing “dine and dashes” as they call them, and they got the wrong guy or they thought he was doing credit card fraud or something like that. And they come in, they arrest the wrong guy, and he has that hilarious reaction. And now it’s you know, it’s a goated meme. It’s funny how like 50% of Australian memes are some guy getting arrested or engaging with police in some way because we’re a convict colony. It’s like, …

 

[1:09:05]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s funny how they have the wrong guy. They have the wrong guy, but he still just gives them so much grief! And it’s a complete smart ass, just by Aussie instinct.

 

I mean, I thought he was the guilty one from the way he reacted, but he’s not. He’s just Australian. [chuckling] And that’s his reaction to authority trying to tell him what to do.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, it’s awesome! It’s goated. It’s legendary. But Tom posted a screenshot from the Wikipedia article. Unfortunately, rest in peace. I believe he passed away. He was 82, but he passed away, I think a couple years ago. But it says here:

 

“In 2023, true crime author Mark Dappin published a biography of Carlson, (so his last name was Carlson) titled ‘Carnage A Succulent Chinese Meal, Mr. Rent a Kill, and the Australian Manson Murders’ that explores his connections to other criminals. The book revealed that Carlson was an admirer of Adolf Hitler and Nazism. And then on at least one occasion he threw a party at his home to celebrate Hitler’s birthday!”

 

Jack Carlson was his name.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Wow, I didn’t know any of that. That’s really interesting.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, so, pretty funny!

 

So the “Succulent Chinese Meal-Democracy Manifest Guy” was our guy! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: You can tell by the way he speaks that he’s a well read individual. You know, he’s quite articulate.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, absolutely! I think he was like a Shakespearean actor. He would act in Shakespearean productions and stuff.

 

39 Blair Giving a Lift to a Stranger

top

 

Blair Cottrell: So, yeah, it’s so interesting the lives people live and you wouldn’t know it. Like you walk pass people on the street.

 

For example, I was getting my car serviced recently and there was an old guy at the mechanic who was also leaving his car there and he had no way to get home, and he lived on the other side of town. So I said:

 

“I’ll take you home, mate, jump in.”

 

I was picking my car up actually, so it was when I was leaving, took him home and we were talking in the car for about 10 minutes. The guy did like 15 years in the Australian Navy, had been to like eight different countries and just had this incredible story, this life story that you wouldn’t have expected. Like he just seemed like some random old homeless guy [chuckling] from the way he was dressed.

 

But yeah, everyone’s got a really interesting set of experiences and if you just ask them the questions, you realise that there’s a lot of little individual worlds going on out there. So much knowledge, a wealth of knowledge. And if you just take an interest and god, I can’t give that advice enough to Zoomers! Zoomers don’t ask enough questions, man!

 

I mean, I love you guys, I love how fast paced you are, how quickly your minds tick over. But you have to ask more questions, right? There’s so much to learn from out there, so much knowledge to absorb.

 

40 More on the Musk-Trump Fallout

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, absolutely! Yeah, let’s talk about the Trump and Elon fallout because it’s quite interesting. Apparently they have a meeting scheduled tomorrow to try and patch things up. So but it was quite interesting.

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you reckon it’s some kind of a stunt with an agenda behind it? Does it seem contrived to you?

 

Joel Davis: No, I don’t think so. I think it’s a genuine falling out because Musk donated more, he was the biggest donor to Trump’s campaign. Not only did he donate heaps, but he also bought X and reformatted the whole site to make it more amenable to Trump’s election campaign, which it’s hard to quantify exactly what impact that had on the election, but it was only positive, whatever the impact was.

 

And obviously he got very close to Trump. He was on the campaign trail in the administration. Early days it seemed like every time Trump was doing a press conference Musk was there with him with his like kids and shit and you know, they seem like best buds all of a sudden. But then in recent months they seem to have drifted and Musk isn’t really getting what he wants. I saw he wasn’t happy with the tariffs. That obviously negatively affects his business interests. He was vocal about that. He’s, not happy with. Trump openly rejects the concept of global warming and backs coal and oil, and these traditional industries, even nuclear energy, but has a lot of contempt for so-called green energy programmes and rebates and subsidies and all that kind of stuff.

 

And so now they’re trying to get rid of those which would really negatively affect Tesla because the electronic vehicle rebates make them competitive in the marketplace in the United States. And the tariff regime is not good either way whether they make Teslas in America or outside America. Either they’re exporting out of America and paying a tariff or they’re bringing it into America and paying a tariff. It’s not good from his perspective.

 

And then also from the perspective of SpaceX I saw Trump say that Elon Musk proposed someone to be head of NASA and Trump knocked back because the guy was a Democrat or something is what he said. I don’t know much about it, but obviously Elon was trying to install his guy in NASA because he’s the number one contractor to the US government when it comes to basically rockets and you know, space faring technologies, etc.

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe Trump was worried that Elon was going to figure out that NASA is all bullshit! Just a way for the American government to divert funds into unknown endeavours. Or maybe I’m wrong. Maybe they are launching a lot of space satillites.

 

[1:14:42]

 

Joel Davis: I don’t think they give that much of a shit about space exploration. But I think NASA is mostly about building rocket tech and other technologies, imaging technologies, etcetera, in order to, create intercontinental weapons systems.

 

And obviously Trump is now pushing forward with trying to build, the Golden Dome to try and build new weapons tech that will potentially be able to neutralise the intercontinental ballistic missiles of their adversaries and neutralise their capacity to obliterate them with nuclear weapons through trying to intercept them mid flight and so on.

 

41 Musk and Big AI Contracts and Peter Thiel the Homosexual Billionaire

top

 

There’s also big AI contracts that were given out to Palantir, which is Peter Thiel’s company. Peter Thiel and Elon Musk are old associates that go back a long way. Peter Thiel actually fucked Elon Musk over, back when Elon Musk was CEO of PayPal. Thiel did a hostile takeover and kind of took over PayPal from Elon Musk back in the early 2000s when he was on his wedding honeymoon, and fucked him over. So they’re old enemies of sorts.

 

And Peter Thiel is the homosexual billionaire who was also basically responsible for J.D. Vance’s political career. He basically funded him all the way up into the Vice Presidency, first into the Senate and then into the Vice Presidency. Very key power player in American politics.

 

And so it seems like he won out over Elon on the AI contract because obviously Elon Musk has been developing Grok under X in order to develop AI capacity. So Musk has lost out on quite a few counts. And he’s obviously upset about that for perhaps obvious reasons. But it’s like as I said on I said on Telegram, it really goes to show that even if you’re like the number one campaign donor to Trump, it doesn’t buy you that much.

 

42 Trump’s Relationship with the Jews, and the Epstein Case

top

 

And so it really, like, begs the question when it comes to Trump’s relationship with the jews, it seems like it’s more than just campaign financing. It’s almost like the jews have a deeper hold over him than just that, a deeper connection with him than just that. And the campaign financing is secondary. It’s just that he’s their guy, so they give him money to help him get elected.

 

But, you know, it indicates that he’s not just doing the bidding of Israel because they threw a few hundred million at him in his political campaign. But there’s something deeper.

 

And of course, Elon Musk came out today and he’s throwing shit at Trump, accusing him of being in the Epstein files, and that’s why they haven’t been released. And was sharing videos of Trump, you know, chumming up with Epstein back in the day and dancing with him at a party and talking to him about all these girls that he was gonna bang at this party. Or whatever. And strongly implying that Trump was somehow involved in the whole Epstein Island thing. And I don’t know if that’s true or not, but there definitely is nefarious connections there of some sort between him and Epstein because they were associates.

 

But also there’s pictures of [chuckling] Elon Musk with what’s her name? Ghislaine Maxwell as well. So it’s not like Elon Musk has no connection to these people. So anyway, shit is being thrown in either direction. It’s pretty interesting to see a fallout like this.

 

43 On Trump’s Charisma

top

 

And I think that if they don’t patch it up, I think Musk comes off worse than Trump. Like, Musk, you know, came up with the big guns, trying to de-legitimize Trump. But the thing is, Trump supporters are so fucking loyal. Like, Trump has been screwing them over for like a decade, giving them basically nothing that he promised almost for a decade, and they are as loyal as fuck! Because the thing is that Trump has rizz. Trump is the most memeable human being on earth alive today. Like, he’s got incredible charisma, he’s funny, he’s likeable! Elon Musk, however, is not likeable.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I just wanted to add in addition to him being charismatic, the guy, I don’t know whether this is deliberate or not, but slotting himself into little, like, TV show cameos, classic American film, like when he appears in Home Alone inside that hotel and speaks to Macaulay Culkin, stuff like that really embedded him into American culture! It really made him a folk hero of the people of America. All of that is great PR. It’s almost like a long term strategy to becoming president later in life. It’s like it’s all worked to his advantage.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But like, you can’t deny that there’s just so many incredible moments from Trump. Like, there’s no end to it. Like when he almost got shot. It was awesome!

 

Blair Cottrell: He’s cool!

 

[1:19:33]

 

 

Joel Davis: When he got arrested, the mug shot he did was just goated. The time when he came out of the plane and Ruth Bader Ginsburg had just died and he was like:

 

“I did not know that! You’re telling me for the first time!”

 

Like, I could go on for like an hour talking about meme-able moments from Trump. Like, it just never ends. Americans love him because they identify with him. He’s kind of like, “that’s my president!” It’s almost like he’s like an avatar of patriotism in America, for better or worse. Right?

 

44 Trump’s Leverage over Musk

top

 

Elon Musk isn’t even really American, doesn’t even have an American accent. He wasn’t born in America. He doesn’t have that kind of loyalty from the people. And he’s kind of like awkward nerd, and so doesn’t have that kind of loyalty. But also, Elon Musk doesn’t have the leverage. Elon Musk companies, SpaceX, Tesla, they’re dependent upon government subsidies and contracts which Trump can control. And Trump came out and said:

 

“You know what, maybe one way that we could cut all the wasteful government spending that Elon has a problem with is to cut all of the subsidies and government contracts that Elon Musk has. Maybe that would be like the first thing to do. I don’t know why Biden didn’t do that.”

 

And so he’s basically threatening to just take an axe to his fortune. And Trump has the leverage to do that if he wanted to.

 

SpaceX is, they’re saying, has lost like half of its value in one day because of Elon’s antics today. And you know, there’s an argument I saw Steve Bannon come out and say that the Trump administration should just like, seize SpaceX as a national security asset off Musk entirely. And which it could if it wanted to. It has the ability to do that. I’m not saying that it’s going to do that. Trump is notoriously kind of moderate. He doesn’t punish his political enemies anywhere near hard enough. And he’s had that tendency for a long time. I wouldn’t expect it to change here. Probably wouldn’t go after Musk too hard. But he’s holding up the cards.

 

Whereas, like, what cards does Musk really have? Like, if Musk threatened to go and say:

 

“Oh, I’m going to go sell rockets to the Chinese instead of you!”

 

They’re just going to take SpaceX off him. If Trump doesn’t want to subsidise his Teslas, eat shit! What is he going to do about it?

 

45 Musk as a Capitalist, a Merchant and a Con Man

top

 

He can’t go to the Democrats and try and like, support the Democrats. They all hate him now. Like, he’s completely burned that bridge because over the last year or two, Musk has said more radical things than Trump has ever said about White genocide and issues facing White People. And I didn’t support Musk because he’s also gone against us on key issues. Like, I remember over Christmas and New Year he went against us on the whole H1B Visa thing. Apparently White people don’t work hard enough when they need to mass import Indians into America to prop up the tech industry. Which just goes to show how Musk is a fraud, doesn’t really believe in anything seemingly. And he just kind of cares about his bottom line, ultimately. For all the ideological bravado and idealism that he presents when he goes on the Joe Rogan podcast or something, it seems like he’s at the end of the day, he’s a fucking capitalist, he’s a merchant and he’s a con man. He kind of acts like he’s like a libertarian who’s against excess government spending and all this kind of stuff, yet he’s like the biggest net beneficiary of government handouts in America.

 

So I think people have a lot less patience for him than for Trump, and Trump has the leverage. So if Musk doesn’t cuck to Trump and doubles down, I could see this being like a death spiral for Elon Musk potentially, which I’d love to see because number one, it’d be funny. And number two, a punished Elon Musk. He could end up doing interesting stuff that destabilises politics in a way that opens up opportunities perhaps for us. You know, it’s its kind of like a wild card. Like the world’s richest man also pissed off at the government with like no political allies. What does he do next? Probably something interesting.

 

So hopefully they don’t patch it up tomorrow and we just like see this feud like exacerbate because it would be it’d be interesting at the very least, but it could potentially result in more free speech on X rather than less, or something where he goes off the reservation. I don’t know, tries to win, win us back somehow by playing to us more.

 

46 Blair Thinks Musk Will Patch Things up with Trump

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe finally my like mid takes that aren’t even that extreme, me and those takes will be allowed back on X. Like out of everyone that got censored, you got to admit, censoring me was one of the most unfair moves.

 

I mean, I try to play by the rules, I try to be the nice guy, but as I’ve said previously in politics, like being the nice guy doesn’t really get you anywhere. Sometimes you got to be the bad guy.

 

But I think they’ll patch it up, man! I think they’ll come to some sort of agreement, because especially in. By what you’ve just described it’s in Musk’s interests to really try to get somewhere with this. Right. It’s not really wise for him to be in Trump’s bad books. But it also goes to show that a lot of the time, political donors don’t have as much power as a lot of people think they do they probably have a lot more power in Australia, [chuckling] but in America, maybe not so much. A lot of the time the people they’re backing can turn on them for various reasons because politics is a bit unpredictable like that.

 

Joel Davis: Well, it goes to show that maybe it’s like the Mossad getting you on video banging underage people or, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Right.

 

Joel Davis: Capturing your children and marrying your children into their bloodlines and things like that are probably more significant than just who writes the checks, like, on some level.

 

Blair Cottrell: And they figured that out eventually, didn’t they? Like, foreign intelligence agencies would have figured out that eventually that money on its own just isn’t enough. They need more leverage over these personalities in countries of interest. But whenever there’s a big split or disagreement between two powerful characters in a country of interest, then it’s a good opportunity for subversives to sort of jump onto the scene as well. And it may, in some cases be the result of the work of subversives. So there’s that to take into consideration for Trump and Musk.

 

[1:25:43]

 

47 Trump’s ‘Big Dog’ Style of Treating Opponents

top

Joel Davis: I hope that their egos get the better of them. Because one thing you notice about Trump is when he has leverage over someone, he flexes on them. Like, I remember when he was kind of staunching in the first administration, he was staunching Kim Jong Un, and he was calling him Little Rocket Man, and he was like:

 

“You’ve got little rockets, I’ve got big rockets. You know don’t fuck with me. Like, if you want to test them out, we’ll send out big rockets and blow up your little rockets!”

 

And then Kim Jong Un ended up inviting him to North Korea, and Trump is standing in the demilitarised zone in Korea, and he was doing the little bunny ears behind Kim Jong Un for all the cameras, just kind of ridiculing him.

 

Or like, when he had Zelensky in the White House, you know, he Was big dogging him in front of the cameras. Trump big dogs world leaders, all the time. He kind of stands over them and he shakes their hand all aggressive and like, pulls them in. He’s got this kind of like natural kind of like dominance aura that he uses to, obviously his advantage. He is successful in politics and business for a reason. He knows how to put himself about. And he’s a great shit talker. He’s always shit talking all of his fucking rivals.

 

Elon’s gone pretty scorched earth here! Elon’s going on Twitter and is accusing him of being a fucking paedophile! He’s going hard! Like, it’s not just like saying you disagree over this or that government policy. Like, he’s going full scorched earth, saying he wants to fund a new political party that can take on the Republicans. And like he retweeted Ian Miles Chong saying:

 

“Trump should be impeached for being on Epstein’s island and J.D. Vance should become president.”

 

And all this kind of shit! So he’s going pretty hard.

 

48 Trump’s Appeal to Conspiratorial Paranoia

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Some of these relationships in politics, even amongst the world’s most powerful people are so fragile. What I was going to say is Trump is relentless. He knows how to appeal to the conspiratorial paranoia. Maybe it’s not paranoia, maybe it’s on point, but just the conspiratorial nature of a lot of his supporters. Like when he mentioned Elon’s black eye and before he was going on some show, he offered him some makeup to cover it up. And Elon didn’t want the makeup, which he thought was interesting. We all know what he’s insinuating there. There’s some weird theory about all of these celebrities that are in some sort of club and at one point they’ve all had black eyes, which may be part of some sort of ritual or initiation process. I don’t know. But maybe Trump doesn’t know either.

 

But the fact that he knows how to appeal to that strong nature of a lot of the people that support him, that’s interesting that he’ll, …

 

49 Trump is a High Level Freemason and is Supported by the Deep State

top

 

Joel Davis: Trump is a high level Freemason. He knows the score. Yeah, he knows what’s happening. He’s in charge for a reason. People were saying:

 

“Oh, Joel! (idiots online) Oh, Joel! If the Deep State has been against Trump for years, if he really went to Epstein’s island, they would have released it!”

 

The Deep State are totally fine with Trump being the fucking President of the United States. You think he’d be able to just waltz into the presidency if the Deep State had an issue? Like, if you’re in my Telegram chat, how are you still operating on this Qtard, like surface level understanding, like, Trump is fucking part of the Deep State! He’s chosen by the Deep State, you fucking idiots!

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, well, why did they attack him, Joel? Why did they go so crazy attacking him during his first presidency then? How do you explain that? You know what it is? This is my take.

 

Joel Davis: Okay.

 

50 Blair’s View of Trump and the Deep State

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Sometimes when you, as a subversive, when you’re into psych warfare, when you’re trying to create a fifth column, sleeper agents, you’re funding them, you’re setting them up. Sometimes when you breed a mad attack dog which has a lot of little weird attack dog puppies, those attack dogs can kind of run loose and it’s hard to get control of them. That’s what I think happened in America with that whole situation. I think there’s wild attack dogs that were just on the loose [chuckling] and it’s been hard to clean up the mess that they’ve made. That’s what I think that whole nonsense was.

 

Joel Davis: Think about it. They didn’t want Trump to win in 2020. They’re dropping Covid pandemics, which had other purposes other than that, obviously. They’re dropping BLM riots, they’re burning down the cities of America. They’re completely rigging the election. They’re launching crazy psyops. Right? This time they just stood down and let him win.

 

So obviously he was allowed to win! Obviously, they wanted him to win this time because things have changed. There’s a shift in strategy and there’s a recognition that he’s the guy for, …

 

51 Why Trump was Put Back In

top

 

Blair Cottrell: It might be that they realised that it was inevitable that he would win, that., …

 

Joel Davis: No! It wasn’t inevitable! They could easily have just rigged it again. They actually undermined Biden too, and took him out before the election was even going to happen.

 

Blair Cottrell: I disagree. I disagree. I think they need to maintain, at least ostensibly, some semblance of legitimacy. They can’t just keep rigging every election, obviously. Right?

 

[1:31:02]

 

Joel Davis: They didn’t though. I’m not saying this election was rigged, but what I’m saying is that they stood down, they didn’t obstruct him from winning this time because Israel got attacked. Biden wasn’t doing enough to protect Israel and the Democrats weren’t. Because the rise of China, issues with Russia. The American foreign policy was not working under the old paradigm. And there was a recognition that they needed to switch to a more realist framework that Trump was providing. Trump was going to provide the leadership that was going to bring people., … No one was signing up to the military anymore. We’re veering towards a potential World War III scenario, but no one wants to join the military. Need to wind the woke back, need to get Americans, you know, back behind their government, back behind their president, back into the military. Trump was just gloating today in a press conference with the German Chancellor Merz. They’re saying:

 

“Oh, it’s the 80th anniversary of D-Day.”

 

Or whatever. And he’s like:

 

“That wasn’t a good day for you, was it?”

 

And then Merz was like:

 

“No, well, no, it was a great day for us because you saved us from the Nazi dictatorship!”

 

And Trump’s like:

 

“Oh, yeah, of course!”

 

But Trump was saying you know, that the Germans need to do what he’s done to replenish their military, that no one wants to fight for Germany right now because they don’t have any spirit. He’s like:

 

“What we have done, we’re recruiting like crazy right now because we’ve brought the spirit back.”

 

And that’s obviously, the spirit comes, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, the spirit comes back to the Germans?

 

Joel Davis: There’s a recognition in the American Deep State that you need to have Trump running it to get the goys back on the team! White men are not playing for the team anymore. And they can’t run a global empire without the White guys running the companies running the military and so on. Rank and file. White men are the foundation of American power. And if you alienate them, America is no longer able to run the world. That’s why he was allowed to win!

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. But there’s people that play all sides, obviously, and if they predict or are able to understand that somebody’s rise is inevitable and can no longer be sort of, the floodgates have to come down and something needs to be allowed to happen, then it’s going to happen on their terms. Still, it’s a mistake to believe that there are sort of world players controlling literally everything in politics. Like, politics is a bit of a chaotic place and, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but this is national power plays in American politics. Like you could see before Israel was attacked on, was it October 7, 2023, Trump was behind Biden in the polls and was basically consistently behind Biden in all the polls for three years. Then as soon as, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Do you remember the polls before the 2016 Trump election? Was it 2015 or 2016? 2016, wasn’t it? The polls had Hillary at like 90% one week before the election.

 

52 The Role of October 7 and Trump

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, because they miscalculated. But the thing is, the polls were accurate this time. And the polls were accurate this time. And what it showed was that basically after October 7th, then all of a sudden the media, the jewish media, start attacking Biden. Rather than covering Biden’s arse for being fucking, basically off with the fairies and senile, they stopped covering his arse and they started exposing him to scrutiny, because Biden wasn’t playing ball for Netanyahu in Israel. It was very clear to see. And then Trump started getting boosted.

 

They had Trump by the balls. They had him in court over so many different court cases, it was looking like they were going to throw him in prison. So he couldn’t even, I mean he could still run from prison technically, but he’s probably not going to win the presidency from a prison cell. They had Trump by the balls, and then all of a sudden Supreme Court decision bails him out! This is after October 7th and then boom! Like Trump comes back and you know, Elon Musk buys Twitter, gets behind him, all the big jew donors get behind him, hundreds of millions get dropped behind him and then it looks like Trump is inevitable and then everyone goes:

 

“Oh, yeah, Trump was always going to win!”

 

But no, I was following this for years. It looked like there’s no, Trump might have been the Republican nominee, it looked like Trump was going to be thrown in prison.

 

So they had Trump fucked and then they let him off. They let him win!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Well, I trust your judgement because I know that you follow American politics a lot more closely than I do. The awkward situation now though, it seems for America, but for the world, or especially probably starting with America as a balancing act that needs to be struck with American culture where some sort of re-nationalised spirit, as you put it, needs to be helped to resurface without the country becoming ethnically nationalist at the same time. Which I think is its easy to do that in America, isn’t it? Because America is so multi-ethnic, whereas it’s not so easy to do in other countries. And that’s the balancing act that I suppose the Trump administration is going to try to strike for various reasons. Obviously they need to recruit more soldiers, police, etc. So interesting to see how that pans out.

 

[1:35:58]

 

53 Taking the Boot off the Neck of Whites

top

 

Joel Davis: They’re obviously taking the boot off the neck of Whites and they’re throwing bones to Whites at the moment. The political elements that are more conservative, the obstructions have been taken out of their ways obviously, like Leftists are still against them for ideological reasons. But the dirty tricks that were being played before stop being played. They got out of the way. The key power players.

 

And then you start seeing Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, these guys were funding Biden and funding the election security efforts and so on in 2020 and all that kind of thing, censoring Trump off all their platforms and so on. They’re all at the inauguration, they’re all shaking hands with Trump this time. There was a total sea change in the attitude of these elites. And there’s a reason for that. It doesn’t just happen because “the people” decided that they wanted him to be president. The people didn’t really change their perspective at all! It was the elites that changed their perspective, from my stance. But yeah, anyway, it’ll be interesting to see what happens.

 

54 Joel Will Be on with Thomas777 Re Philosophical Anti-Semitism, etc.

top

 

I see people saying:

 

“For real though, Joel is rocking the Thomas777 look!”

 

Well, actually I was just talking to Thomas earlier. I think Monday night Australian time, Monday morning American time. We’re going to do a, another collab. We’re going to talk about philosophical anti-semitism. We’re going to talk about Martin Heidegger. We’re going to get into the weeds of political philosophy and you know, NS philosophy and its precursors and so on. So it should be interesting stream for those who are looking for something a little bit intellectual. But our way inclined. Thomas is always an enjoyable collaborator. I’ve done a lot of podcasts with him over the years. He’s a good friend. So I’ll put up a link for that when the time comes. But yeah, like I said, Monday night, I think Monday morning America time.

 

People are saying that you were trying to speak but you’re muted.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I just realised that before. But that’s okay. I was just saying that it’s curious. Oh, it’s not really curious. It doesn’t even, it doesn’t need to be said. It’s fine. That’s why I didn’t even pick up on it.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, okay. I was looking at at something else. I wasn’t looking at the screen. Is there another, any other subjects for us to cover?

 

Blair Cottrell: No, I don’t think so. I’ve had a busy week so I only got a couple of days to actually spend or maybe a day and a half where I actually had time enough to post to my social media this week. But I’m going to look at spending a bit more time making some more clip content and putting some more stuff out there. So I’m looking forward to that.

 

But I think we, what do we do? We did the NSN banner drop at Northland Shopping Centre. We did the speculation around that, or not speculation, just discussion around the response. Then we did Elon versus Trump. What else has happened the last week? Is there anything else?

 

55 Thomas Sewell on the Ex-UFC Fighter Jake Shields Show

top

 

Joel Davis: I don’t think of any like huge stories. I see Anthony Scalise saying:

 

“Joel, any information on the Jake Shields collab?”

 

Yeah, Tom recorded a podcast with Jake Shields on the Jake Shields Show this week. I don’t know exactly when that is going to be released but I think soon. So obviously it’s already been recorded. So that’s an interesting one.

 

Obviously I’ve been on Jake’s podcast before. He’s a friend. And yeah it’s great, it’s great that he’s has platform Ed not only me, but Tom as well. That he’s platforming Australian nationalists. You know, ex-UFC fighter. No, he’s not a Nazi. He’s not as radical as us, but he’s at least open to like hearing our perspective and platforming our perspective. And you know he’s always very critical of jewish power and he’s sympathetic towards pro-White politics. So you know, it’s nice to have a platform like that to break the siege. Obviously we’re under censorship, pretty heavy censorship. Tom and I and you, some of the most censored people in the world. Like we’re censored from fucking everything!

 

56 Still Banned from X Jew to Oz Government Pressure

top

 

Blair Cottrell: So yeah, that’s what I was going to say. It’s like, I hope that Tom took the opportunity to try to put the message out there. And, I don’t know, maybe Jake can help put pressure on the right people to get us back on X. Because it sucks not being on X! It sucks not being part of the conversation around the world. You know, Telegram these days, Telegram was pretty big during Covid I remember a lot of people came to Telegram to get their news during the Covid era, the lockdowns and all that shit! But these days, everyone’s kind of moved on from Telegram. There’s still the kind of little small loyalist following that I have on there, but it’s just not the reach is nowhere near what it would be if we could get on X as well.

 

And as I just mentioned earlier, it’s a really unfair ban, I think. I mean, you look at the kind of stuff that’s posted on X, and especially the content I was putting out there, it wasn’t even that bad. It’s obviously like part of some contrived effort or pressure.

 

Joel Davis: The Australian government requested that we be banned.

 

Blair Cottrell: We don’t have any evidence of that, but it looks that way. It’s kind of obvious that that’s what happened because we all got taken down at the same time. All our appeals got ignored! We haven’t even had a single. I haven’t had a single reply. Have you had a reply from X staff?

 

Joel Davis: No! Usually when you get banned, they send you an email saying you’ve been banned. I didn’t even get that.

 

Blair Cottrell: Correct! I didn’t get that either. And I haven’t had a single, I’ve appealed a few times, haven’t had a single reply. They’re just like, fuck you! It’s like, what do I actually even do to get banned? Bullshit!

 

We were in the gym, Joel and I, just having a conversation, and some young guys overheard our conversation and they approached us and said:

 

“Hey, do you guys have social media? Where can we find you guys?”

 

And we had to tell them:

 

“Well, we’re kind of banned off everything. We have Rumble.”

 

They didn’t even know what Rumble was. And they said:

 

“Are you on X?”

 

And we said:

 

“No, we’re banned off X.”

 

And they laughed and said:

 

“How did you get banned off X?”

 

And I realised that to the standard person, X just seems to be a place where you can say whatever you want. So they’re like:

 

“Wow, what the hell did you post to get banned off X?”

 

They assume that you’ve posted something really bad, like gore or hectic shit that no one would want to see! But it wasn’t that. It was just because we are dissidents in Australia. It’s because the Australian government requested to X that we were banned. And it’s like, it made me realise how kind of like forced into the corner we are down here in Australia.

 

57 The Censorship is Preventing Them from Being a Sought After Voice in Oz

top

 

And what’s most frustrating I reckon. I don’t know if this is like big noting myself, but I could say the same for Joel, I think. If it wasn’t for all the censorship, I’m quite confident that I would still be one of the most sought after voices for just general commentary in this country. Because the following I had before I was banned was massive! I used to get the same reach as Channel 9, 7 and 10 put together on Facebook, at least, when I was allowed to use Facebook back in the day. And I would have only grown from there. I get banned and then Avi Yemeni kind of takes my place and all the former audience I used to have just watch him because there’s no one else to watch anymore.

 

That’s the problem with censorship. Like, you get kind of like taken off the table or off the stage, screen, whatever, and some like bullshit jewish Israel shill takes your place and just talks some shit and sort of spells the audience and misleads them, takes their money for all sorts of nefarious purposes:

 

“Guys, I’m in the back of a police car. You need to donate to my legal fund right now!”

 

You know, it’s like the results of the censorship have been dreadful! And it works, doesn’t it? Censorship? It really does.

 

[1:43:51]

 

 

58 Avi Yemeni Scamming His Supporters

top

 

Joel Davis: How is he getting thrown? How’s he getting arrested? They don’t even take his phone off him. Like, get fucking! That’s obviously, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. You know what they did? I know this too. Like, I heard about this. I wouldn’t say this if it wasn’t true too. That video, I think it was a few years ago where Avi Yemeni claimed he had been arrested unfairly because he was just trying to report on something. It might have been a lockdown rally or something. He was in the back of a police car instantly demanding money for a legal fund because the police had arrested him. They literally just drove him down the street and just dropped him up the next suburb. They didn’t even really arrest him, they just took him down the road. And everyone who donated just got fleeced! Just got fucking scammed! And that’s so sad, man, that people are trying to do the right thing. They’re believing in something, they want to support someone who they believe is representing them. And that’s what happens. You just get some jewish Israel shill taking your money and laughing at you. That’s what Avi does. He takes people’s money and he laughs at them. So it’s a shame, but that’s the kind of that censorship has facilitated.

 

59 Despite Censorship Our Recognition in the Public is Growing

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Well, I mean, even despite the censorship, we still go insanely viral all the time. Like, I was talking to some family members of mine, I won’t say who, younger guys the other day, and one of them was like:

 

“Oh, Joel. All the kids at school were like, watching this video and then they were showing it to me and it was you talking about Hitler! And I was like, ‘that’s my cousin!’.”

 

And then my other cousin goes:

 

“Oh, yeah, that’s like I saw this other video of you talking about Hitler on TikTok the other day. It had like millions of likes.”

 

I was like:

 

“Okay, I don’t even know what video that is.”

 

But, I mean, that’s pretty funny. Like I hear people say that all the time. They saw me on Instagram, they saw me on TikTok. I don’t even have accounts on these platforms. It’s just other people reposting it.

 

So obviously, even despite the censorship that we have, by being organically interesting we’re still known out there. Every time I go out in Sydney or Melbourne, if I go out to the city for a drink or something, at least one person comes up to me and recognises me and says:

 

“Oh, hey, it’s great to meet you. Keep doing what you’re doing, if not more.”

 

We’ve become infamous in Australia, or maybe famous, you could say, even in Australia, despite everything, despite how we’ve been treated.

 

Blair Cottrell: So I know that you like to look at the glass half full, which is what you’re doing now, but I realised you are right, now that I think about it. When I said censorship works, it works at first! It works to sort of not nullify, but significantly reduce your reach, but only for a year or two. And then gradually, if you’re consistent and if you try to find every way around the censorship possible. Yeah, you do you become more infamous. You become even more sought after, I think.

 

And the longer and more aggressively you’re censored, the more consistent you are in response to that, the more infamous you can potentially become. So it’s kind of like that real cliche saying that tyranny actually just feeds tyrants and censorship is a form of modern tyranny, which in the long run actually just feeds more people into our audience basket.

 

[1:47:25]

 

Joel Davis: Well, I don’t think so. I think if we had no censorship we’d have a much bigger viewership.

 

Blair Cottrell: Obviously it’d just grow faster. It just grow more organically. Right? But think of it like this. Think of it like a weed. I’m not saying that we’re like a weed, but that’s how the government views us. And they’re spraying us with poison. That’s what censorship is. And it, like, prevents us from growing, but it doesn’t kill us. We actually just start adapting to the poison and then they have to spray us with a lot more poison to get the same effect that they got previously. Then that poison doesn’t work. So they’ve got to go for some higher grade shit!

 

But all that’s actually happening is we’re adapting. We’re being forced to adapt the organism that we are to the circumstances imposed on us. That’s what censorship kind of forces you to do. I suppose.

 

60 Surviving the Censorship Because What We Have to Say is So Interesting

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

But I mean, the only reason that we’re able to get around, like, pretty much no one would be able to survive this level of censorship. The only reason that we can is because we’re just that interesting.

 

Blair Cottrell: And also very autistic. So we don’t really feel emotionally crushed by it. You know, it’s kind of like:

 

“Oh we got censored again. Okay.”

 

It’s like, [chuckling] you don’t really get disheartened by it, right?

 

61 Censorship Does Make It Hard to Recruit People Because They Don’t Know How to Join

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I think it’s more that we’re so motivated by our cause that we’re not going to stop.

 

But yeah, the main effect of censorship is actually this. Actually we managed to get out there and still be known and get talking points out there, get attention. But what’s difficult is recruiting people to our organisation because people will see a clip, people will see a news broadcast, they’ll see us, they’ll be aware that we exist. But they won’t really know:

 

“Okay, how do I go and like, join these guys or find out more?”

 

And if they go to look online to try and find out more, it’s hard to actually find the details. So that’s the main difficulty.

 

62 the System is Afraid of Us Recruiting Thousands of Men

top

 

It’s that it’s actually preventing us from recruiting effectively and that’s obviously why they do it, because what they’re really afraid of, it’s not just us being popular, people watching our videos. What they’re really afraid of is us building a movement of thousands and thousands of men. That’s what they’re petrified of!

 

And so that’s what their efforts are all about. Whether it be the way, how heavily we’re policed to try and intimidate people out of getting involved in the movement whether it be the way they go after people try and like take away their livelihoods. Censorship, all of it centres around trying to create obstacles for us to recruit people where the, …

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s truek.

 

Joel Davis: Making as difficult as possible to get a bunch of nationalists in the same room or the same place together.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s part of the government’s counter extremist efforts, which are, I’ve said previously, are just repurposed counterinsurgency.

 

The point is to prevent you from appealing to the public and then especially from recruiting from the public, or for recruiting from the public.

 

So what happens is if you’re a dissident, one that can potentially threaten the current regime, you get classed as an “extremist” and then you’re susceptible or targeted by counter extremist measures which include censorship, harassment ostracism from society, losing bank account, blah, blah, blah, the list goes on and on.

 

But as I’ve said, that’s not actually legal to do that in a democracy.

 

So eventually names, identities of people who are responsible for actually directing certain government agencies or setting up and being involved in government agencies that are doing that to Australian citizens, that are classifying them as extremists, basically stripping all their rights away and then just harassing and bullying them, preventing them from participating in society on a normal level. Eventually those people will be brought to justice.

 

63 Communists and Other Anti-Racist Activists Have Embedded Themselves Within Our Key Institutions

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! And that’s the thing, that’s what Australians don’t realise. There are communists and other anti-racist activists that have embedded themselves within our key institutions, not just at the academic level but at the policing level. And they’re engaging in political policing under the auspices of so-called “Counter Terrorism” measures. We’re not terrorists by any definition of that term. And even the head of ASIO has agreed with this multiple times under Senate scrutiny that we’re not terrorists and we can’t be classified as terrorists, we don’t engage in terroristic activity.

 

But then they go:

 

“But oh, you’re extremist!”

 

What is an extremist? I saw an old interview, actually, of you and Tom from way back in the day, Blair, on a Current Affair, talking about African crime actually, I think it was from like 2019 or something. And they accused you of being an extremist. And what Tom said was that:

 

“An extremist is just someone who takes an idea to its logical conclusion.”

 

And that’s literally all it is. It’s just taking an idea that seriously that you 100% believe in it, rather than being like these politicians who claim to have a whole set of different ideals but don’t take them to their logical conclusion, either because they don’t have the ideals, or because if you actually took them to their logical conclusion there’ll be very bad ideals. Like when it comes to, …

 

Blair Cottrell: But it depends on what the logical conclusion is, though.

 

[1:52:40]

 

64 Because We Have Ideals They Call That “Extremism”

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But if you take Leftism to its logical conclusion, it would result in basically exterminating White people, like in a very aggressive way.

 

And if you took our ideas to their logical conclusion, it would basically restore Australia to being a great country, across every metric and make your life, if you’re a normal White person, so much better than it is right now. But that’s what we’re guilty of we’re just guilty of actually having ideals and they call that “extremism”.

 

So basically what they’re trying to do is they’re trying to make it illegal essentially for you to have Right-wing ideals, for you to take the ideals of nationalism to the logical conclusion. Now they don’t have Left-wing extremism. Even though there’s Left-wingers that are engaging in political violence on a frequent basis, who harbour genocidal hatred. They’re allowed to take their ideas to their logical conclusion. So it’s a complete double standard! It’s a totally arbitrary standard applied ideologically just to be persecute the ideological enemies of the regime, of the current ruling class. An ideology which the majority of Australians don’t subscribe to and are actually offended by. But nevertheless because they control the levers of power and because of mass apathy and a mixture of apathy and demoralisation and disorganisation, they’re able to get away with it for now.

 

65 the System Calling Us “Extremists” to Justify Their Own Lawfare and Extremism Against Us

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. It’s why they come up with certain arbitrary terms in order to justify the sort of action that they take against dissidents such as extremists. Because lawfully extremist doesn’t mean the same as terrorists, does it? They know we’re not terrorists! They know I’m not a terrorist. They know you’re not a terrorist, as you said. The head of ASIO has publicly stated that these guys aren’t terrorists due to Senate inquiries or whatever the hell is going on there.

 

But they still need to try to justify the sort of measures that they take in order to prevent us from appealing or recruiting from the public. Appealing to or recruiting from the public, which, as I said is the whole point of counterinsurgency. So any sort of language, any sort of phraseology they can come up with to justify extreme censorship ostracism, bullying, bully tactics lawfare, all the sorts of stuff that we’ve experienced.

 

66 Blair Barred from a Tafe Course Because Minorities Might Be “Unsafe”

top

 

Like, I can’t even go to a school. I think I went to a TAFE to try to do a Cert 4. You know what happened? The course leader, after about four weeks, told me that:

 

“I had to withdraw from the course because my identity had been discovered and minority students in the classroom may be exposed to an unsafe learning environment.”

 

It’s [chuckling] like just because my name’s Blair Cottrell! That’s why I’m not allowed to go to a TAFE in Australia right now, in democracy. And they know that I’m not going to hurt anyone. They know that I don’t have a history of that kind of thing in politics. But that’s not what’s important. What’s important is how they can come up with the sort of language and phraseology to justify pushing me out of society! To make sure that I never appeal to anyone! Because my ideas are dangerous for the current system. The way the system is currently set up.

 

But yeah, it’s a system that needs to change.

 

67 Superchats

top

 

Joel Davis: Well, while you fix that microphone [Blair bumped it], I think we’ll get into the Superchats. You can send a Superchat on Rumble. I don’t think you can send them on Odysee anymore. You can send them only on Rumble or on EntropyStream dot Live slash Joel Davis.

 

Anyway, we’ve got a few here already. One from Calmius saying:

 

“Blair, what’s the story of your beanie?”

 

Blair Cottrell: It was given to me by someone I knew quite a while ago. I don’t know if it was handmade. I can’t remember. But it’s so absurd that I tend not to wear it in public. This is something that I put on, … Can you guys hear me? Okay? I had to plug my microphone back In. I knocked it off the stand. Can you hear it?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: Same as before. I don’t know if it’s been picked up. Yeah.

 

But yeah, there’s not a great story behind it. It’s just an orange beanie with. What do you call this? Do you call that a pom. A pom pom? [chuckling] I don’t know what that is.

 

Yeah. But I just, I’ve stopped caring so much about how I look and so I don’t really care. I’m just wearing it because it was cold tonight. I don’t know what you want me to say. It’s just a beanie, bro.

 

Joel Davis: It’s all that deep.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Rygo Weber said:

 

“Once again, great show guys. What do you think about the Trump and Elon spat?”

 

Well, we already got into that. So you don’t really need to answer it again. If you watch the show, we discussed it for like 20 minutes. Comfy Friend said:

 

“Great show!”

 

And shout out to Comfy Friend broadcasting the show on his X. Much appreciated. Zero seven to all the Comfy Friend viewers this evening. Of course the show’s on Rumble. It’s on Odysee and back on X for now.

 

So thanks for that man. I appreciate it. He does a good job shilling our shit collectively on X with all of us banned.

 

So you can follow Comfy Friend on X to still get your dose of NSN. Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell, Tom Sewell content. Jacob Hersant content as well:

 

“You will never have children!”

 

Spiteful mutant supporter said:

 

“Capitalism has made it this way. Old fashioned fascism will take it away.”

 

68 Superchat – Left Wing and Right Wing Views on Capitalism

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I always get a little bit awkward when someone just blames everything on capitalism. It seems like an oversimplification to me. What do you think, Joel?

 

[1:58:50]

 

Joel Davis: I mean, yeah, but it’s definitely a dynamic. I mean but there’s a distinction between I think like a Left-wing and a Right-wing criticism of capitalism. So generally Left-wing criticisms of capitalism have to do with exploitation. This idea that, oh there’s all these fat cats that are making all this money at the expense of everyone. And basically the implication is that if we could just somehow like divide up the benefits more equitably that it would be okay.

 

Obviously there’s other Left-wing critiques, like you know, the idea that commodification is culturally destructive or environmentally destructive, but that they would share with like Right-wing critiques of capitalism.

 

But, a more Right-wing critique of capitalism would be double pronged. One that capitalism as a structure elevates the wrong kind of people into political leadership. So under like a feudal society where you had like an aristocracy, the selection pressures on leaders were different and we had basically warriors, men who fought with honour who passed down their titles intergenerationally and raised their children through good breeding but also through good rearing to become, to develop a kind of honour based, you know, moral code and to rule with an honour based, you know, warrior code. And therefore that created a more virtuous society.

 

Where under capitalism you have all these merchants that simply gain political power because they made a lot of money. And the attributes that make you successful in business don’t necessarily make you an honourable man and therefore you don’t have an honourable government. That’s like a Right-wing critique of capitalism.

 

Or another Right-wing critique of capitalism would be that the process of commercialisation is destructive to folkways, to culture. That when everything becomes commodified and you have this kind of global marketplace that it breaks down the local traditions and forms of identity and globalises and abstracts everything out into this like universal, into like universal individual units. And we basically lose all connection with who we really are. And as a result our moral and cultural fabric like disintegrates. I think I agree with these criticisms. And that doesn’t mean that we should, become communists, obviously! There’s a false dichotomy between capitalist and communist.

 

The alternative is not necessarily to abolish money or abolish property or something. That’s not the issue. The issue with capitalism is in that some people are rich and some people are poor. The issue are these other things. It’s about how do you create a political system that basically ensures that virtuous honourable men maintain leadership and rule and hold other elements to account that everything doesn’t get relativised in terms of “what’s good for business”. And secondarily, how do you preserve the culture of your people from being liquidated into this global marketplace? How do you stop commodification and preserve some kind of sacredness and tradition?

 

And obviously National Socialism, political ideology tries to do this,

 

69 Francis Yockey’s Description of Socialism Versus Capitalism in His Book Imperium

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Mandatory military service. You can start with that. And no one holds office without having done their military service and have achieved a certain rank perhaps. I reckon that’s a good start.

 

But I like Francis Yockey’s description of socialism versus capitalism in his book Imperium, where he basically insinuates that capitalism represents one aspect of human nature and so it’s impossible to actually eliminate it because it represents the selfish motivation which is half the reason anyone ever does anything. If you make it so people can’t actually advance their own interests, then you kill the incentive to actually do anything. Because no one wants to do anything if it’s purely just in the interests of the community and not themselves. Because as humans we have to see some sort of benefit, individual benefit in things that we do.

 

He summarises that capitalism means basically every man for himself, whereas the opposing view, socialism, the opposing economic system of socialism, is the other form of human nature, which is to do things for the advancement of the community in spite of oneself sometimes, which again can be half the reason we’re doing things at the same time. So I like that summary because it’s more personable. It sort of gets more into the nature of people and the compulsion, the motivation that goes beyond just economics and financial considerations of why people do things.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Like we talk about the problems with individualism but at the same time also value liberty. Like anyone, I think like most people, most Anglo Saxons. I don’t like excessive bureaucracy and over regulation of everything. I like for normal people to be largely left alone to their own devices, to choose their own destinies up to a level. Obviously you need to put hard limits on that. But where possible, it’s good to basically bias towards freedom and have to justify it away rather than the reverse.

 

But having said that, like liberalism as an ideological framework has been obviously disastrous for our people. So it needs to be attacked at its root. And people have to come before our individual freedom ultimately.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. I was about to say that. I think politically we need to be more socialist than we are capitalists because the more socialist you are, the more you’re considering the effect on the broader community and the future generations rather than just how you are benefiting now in the moment or how you’re affected by anything happening in the moment.

 

And obviously if you’re dealing with the future of a country, you need to be more socialist in your considerations. And that’s all socialism actually means at the end of the day is considering how anything may affect the greater ethnic community. The problem with communism though is it doesn’t really consider socialism from an ethnic perspective. It doesn’t consider the group as, …

 

Joel Davis: Universal humanity.

 

Blair Cottrell: Correct. It’s universal and it’s also class based which is just like a different form of looking at humanity on a universal basis.

 

[2:05:42]

 

70 Marx and the Destruction of Classes

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. The reason why Marx identifies the proletariat as the revolutionary subject of history is not because he wants them to stay the proletariat, but because the proletariat, the working class, is being exploited by capitalism. He sees it as the vehicle to the destruction of classes.

 

So the ideal of Marxism is to abolish class and to end in a kind of, in like a universal humanity where we’re all on the same level. Like it’s about destroying the category of bourgeoisie, entirely. It doesn’t have this like perennial mindset that there’ll always be workers versus capitalists that will go on forever. Like obviously the idealist from the Marxist standpoint is to overthrow it.

 

But, whereas I think our view from the Right because we’re realists is more that like what you were saying before, that the forces that are imbued within capitalism they’re part of human nature and that they’ll always have some kind of representation within society. And it’s about trying to get the balance right. You’re never going to be able to ultimately decide on one or the other extreme. That’s kind of irrational utopianism.

 

But instead you kind of have to just take human nature for what it is and try and balance these forces as best you can. That’s a more Right-wing perspective.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s right. That’s definitely the attitude that’s the position I would take right now based on my understanding.

 

71 Superchat: is Techno Trance and EDM the Most Aryan Music Around?

top

 

Joel Davis: Mhm. All right. Superchat Aussie Artist 88 said:

 

“Blair bro, is techno trance and EDM the most Aryan music around? It’s the natural evolution of the Germanic spirit. Fast paced and yet spiritual. What’s your opinion?”

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve never thought of it that way, but maybe that’s a really interesting perspective. I can tell you no other genre of music makes me feel what I feel when I listen to really good trance and electronic dance music. Like that stuff just invigorates me in a way that’s difficult to explain through words. So it’s very possible. I do feel like it hits me on another level. One that’s hard to express. What do you think, Joel? You’re into your music a little bit, right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think, I mean the most Aryan music, I mean you’ve got classical music, you’ve got like heavy metal, all the different sub genres of metal. You’ve got electronic music. You know, they’re all different like phases in technology. Like Wagner couldn’t have started a metal band because electric guitars didn’t exist yet, you know. And then I don’t know, Slayer, I mean obviously there was like synthesisers and stuff, but they didn’t have like the apparatus that you use to make electronic music wasn’t fully developed yet and it’s produces different genres. So it’s like when Aryans are dealing with electronic instruments, they make a certain kind of music. When they’re dealing with electric instruments, they make another kind of music. When they’re dealing with pre-electric instruments, they make another kind of music. You know, that’s how I see it. I don’t think it makes sense to like try and argue, one is more airing than the other. It’s like all of them are expressions of our spirit. All of them are expressions of our racial nature.

 

Blair Cottrell: I think someone just really appreciates like trance music. I can say this. A thought occurred to me as I was listening to Joel just then that I think a lot of trance music, if you listen or pay attention to the structure of how the track develops, it’s basically, and I’m not trying to be vulgar with this is a very objective analysis. It’s how sex would sound to the soul. It’s almost like the process of sex put into audio form, if you understand what I mean. Like, I don’t know how to explain it exactly, but there’s like that build up or the process.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, kind of orgasmic quality.

 

Blair Cottrell: Right. Reaching that climax point and then the climax point hits and it hits really hard. And that is the sort of pinnacle of the track. Just like that is the pinnacle of the experience that you have through sex. I think maybe that’s why it makes us feel a certain way that other music can’t really.

 

Joel Davis: But yeah, there’s an ecstatic, there’s an ecstatic quality to it. That’s what’s appealing about it. I think that ecstatic quality is can also be found in psychedelic forms of guitar based music as well.

 

But yeah, it definitely comes through. And the lines get blurred sometimes between electronic instruments and those kinds of genres as well, particularly in recent decades. Like the kind of like music that’s categorised as goth in that spectrum, for example, often blurs the lines between those categories.

 

But yeah, I enjoy all, basically all of those genres of music. I’m glad that they all exist. They all represent different emotions. Like metal is like more epic! It’s kind of like music of like war and aggression and intensity and horror and all those kinds of spectrum of emotions. And you’ve got like gothic and alternative rock genres that have kind of romantic quality to them but they also have psychedelic quality. And then electronic music is like m can often be more ecstatic! Yeah.

 

[2:11:05]

 

72 Music Can “Spell” Us in the Same Way as a Good Speech

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Isn’t it true that music can spell us in the same way that a good speech can? It’s a similar type of magic or has a similar type of effects on people. And I realised that young.

 

And one of my secrets when I was learning about public speaking was I used to study certain songs that would make me feel a certain way. And I thought:

 

“Wow, maybe I can create a speech or practise roughly the way I can deliver a speech, or a method through which I can deliver a speech where I can incorporate the same melody, or a similar melody to what I’m hearing in this song and put that melody into the words I’m speaking.”

 

So I think, there’s something to be said about that and there’s probably some sort of underground science where you can get into that and study it. I didn’t really get into anything underground but I just made the connection as a result of my own, you know, learning when I was a bit younger.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well music is the language of the soul. You know, it has like the ability to say things that words can’t. Or maybe words can say it but they can’t really convey it in the same way that that music can because it’s more, viscerally emotive.

 

This is why I think like Schopenhauer’s view on music is utterly retarded! Because for Schopenhauer music was supposed to be like a method by which we could disconnect, from like the life force and disconnect from like the drives and will embedded in the body and achieve some kind of like mystical, you know, disinterested union with the absolute or whatever. And I find generally what’s great about music is precisely the opposite. That music is the life force made manifest in its most potent form. I guess on that side I would side with Nietzsche against Schopenhauer*.

 

[*Nietzsche criticised Schopenhauer’s pessimistic view of life and suffering, advocating instead for an artistic and affirmative approach to existence. He believed that embracing suffering could lead to personal growth and strength, contrasting with Schopenhauer’s call for resignation and detachment from desires.]

 

73 Sargon of Akkad Having an Event in Australia

top

 

But yeah, anyway, Skinhead Friend said:

 

“Have you seen Tom Roussell, also known as Survive the Jive and Sargoy of Akkad are speaking in Australia later this year. Sargoy is getting more based lately and Survive the Jive has always been solid.”

 

Yeah, I did see that. There is an event. I think they’re almost sold out. They only had 100 tickets for sale and they were selling them for like a thousand bucks each or something. So meant to be like an exclusive event.

 

Blair Cottrell: Isn’t it Sargon of Akkad. Why is he Sargoy of Akkad?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, that’s obviously a joke. Yeah, people used to call him Sargoy of Mossad well back in the day. Sargoy of Mossad. It’s pretty funny.

 

Blair Cottrell: Why is he called that though? Is it speculated, has he been accused?

 

Joel Davis: Well, back in the day, lately he has been better. But back in the day he was a big defender of classical liberalism. He always get into debates with people from the so-called Alt-Right. There was one really famous debate that he had with Richard Spencer back in the day, like 2018 era, something like that. Maybe 2017. I can’t remember the exact year, but it was back in that era. And, yeah, he was kind on the other side of the fence.

 

Whereas lately he’s kind of come more around. Not all the way, but he’s come a lot closer to like defending ethno-nationalism. Like he’ll defend ethno-nationalism like 90% now.

 

So yeah, I don’t think that he’s like an agent of the jews or something. I think he’s just a temperamental conservative. He’s a bit cucked because he’s just a temperamental conservative. But some of the people that he platforms on his Lotus Eater podcast platform that he runs, some of them aren’t bad, some of them kind of suck. Some of them are pretty good. Young, kind of like blonde Aryan English guys who are obviously our guys. A few of them, I won’t name names but you know, had some good interactions with some of them on Twitter over the years before I was banned.

 

So yeah, I don’t have anything against him. He seems like a nice guy. I think he I think his heart’s in the right place, but he’s just a little bit cucked, obviously, for my liking, but he’s all right.

 

As for Survive the Jive, he does good stuff. I’ve always enjoyed his YouTube channel. Have you ever seen his YouTube videos? He talks a lot about you know, Anglo and Germanic and Nordic history and ancient Paganism, things like that.

 

Blair Cottrell: A little bit. Yeah. A little bit. I was gonna say that. Seems like the boys have been successful on the bullying front with a Sargoy of Akkad. [chuckling] You know, with all the names and the pressure. It’s funny to see stuff like that build on some content creators and influencers who are obviously very in love. Not in love they’re very attached to their online Persona, whatever it is that they’ve created for themselves. They’ve managed to dodge the censorship and try to be reasonable or whatever, but through just chipping away through effective bully measures, the boys just managed to shove them in the right direction, gradually!

 

Joel Davis: I saw people complaining that they got banned from my Telegram chat. Look, I got a lot of moderators. It probably wasn’t me, but I’ll tell you this. If you send a Superchat with your Telegram app, I’ll unban it. That’s the deal. It’s a guarantee you can buy your way back in!

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel!

 

Joel Davis: There you go.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m surprised. I didn’t think Joel would be so easily sway with money.

 

[2:16:20]

 

Joel Davis: But if you post garbage, you might get banned again. So watch yourself. It doesn’t guarantee you a permanent residency, but you can buy a second chance. At The Joel and Blair Show, we believe in second chances.

 

Soul Vinda said:

 

“Amazing aesthetics on that NSN edit. This is the spirit that will win over the motivated youth.”

 

Yeah, it was a sick edit. I think it might have been Gus who made it. I don’t know who made it, but I’m feeling it was Gus. Yeah, but it was a sick edit. Did you like it? Were you just blowing smoke up its arse because it was on the show? Be honest. Do you think it sucks?

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, no man! Did you see me dancing to it? That was shit was hype! Loved it. If it was Gus that made it, salute, bro! Excellent work! Some of these young guys are great on the edits. Yeah. I wouldn’t even know how they do it, to be honest. I used to think I was pretty good at editing and I can edit, like, videos, basic edits, but I wouldn’t even know how to produce shit like that these days. So it’s good stuff. It’s impressive.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t do that you should know me better than that. I don’t blow smoke up people’s asses. If you’re hearing me say something nice, it’s genuine, man! I don’t throw around false compliments. I always just try to find something about people I can appreciate. So that’s why sometimes I can come across as probably too nice. But no, yeah, I really did like the video.

 

74 Getting Around Censorship with Uploading Clips, Edits

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I think Anderson puts out cool, cool edits. And yeah, that’s what you need.

 

By the way, those of you who are on TikTok, Instagram, whatever, Twitter, re-upload the edits and go find the old ones as well and spam them out there. Obviously we want you uploading clips from the show as well and other things, but get those hyper edits out there. Get, get some eyes on them! Put them particularly on places like TikTok and Instagram, where they’re gonna have more chance of going viral.

 

We’re just talking about censorship before. The main reason that we can get around censorship is part of it is through being provocative and interesting. But another massive component of it is you guys. You guys that are re-uploading content, clipping content, things like that, to make sure that even though we’re banned, the content lives on.

 

So I appreciate it. It’s one way that you can help the movement. Very easy way to help the movement is simply that.

 

Crafty Boom said:

 

“Lead the way, men. Let’s go!”

 

And Testy Testerson said:

 

“Buy a few beers on me.”

 

I see also on Entropy, Deer in the Headlights said:

 

“Carry on, gentlemen, you’re doing great work!”

 

And Shovelhead Amy said:

 

“Thanks for what you’re doing. From an avid listener here in Antario, Canada. People are paying attention.”

 

I should have said Ontario, sorry.

 

75 On Canadians and Australians

top

 

Blair Cottrell: What is with Canadians? Why do we vibe so hard with Canadians? What’s going on there? I think we’ve covered this on last couple of shows. I just keep seeing Canadians pop up all the time. And my heart goes out to Canada. They seem to be going through similar struggles and we seem to have, I don’t know, some sort of similarity between us Aussies and Canadians. They appreciate us and I appreciate them. So thanks, Canada. Thanks for watching.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but she said:

 

“From a true toque lover. Those are great toques.”

 

I wonder what a fucking “toque” is?:

 

“The consistency and level headedness that you men display is what people are Sorely craving. And I find it amusing that you call them beanies. It’s a toque. Toque is what we call them.”

 

Yeah, well we’re not fucking Canadians, so we call them beanies.

 

Blair Cottrell: You know what I thought? Toke, man! You know what I thought toke, meant? I thought it was a take, but it was like a take from someone that was like high on something.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, you give a bong head. Like “give us a toke”, that kind of thing. Yeah, no, we love Canadians. Canadians are kind of like nice versions of us. I think. They’re like, if Australians were nice.

 

Blair Cottrell: But the fact Canadians like us shows that perhaps they feel, I don’t know, there’s some deep appreciation for our nature and humour. So maybe they’re not as nice as they ostensibly seem or have a reputation for being. Maybe they have this like contained, …

 

Joel Davis: Unless they’re French-Canadians, they’re from the same stock. So I think they just kind of, they kind of understand us. They can, they have a similar national story. They come from the same root populations and so because of that ethnic connection, I think they can kind of understand where Australians are coming from, generally.

 

Blair Cottrell: Would you agree they’re very sensible people. Canadians always seem to be well spoken, I mean it’s not always going to be the case. It’s going to be outliers. But all the Canadians that I know of, they’re well spoken, presentable, sensible, intelligent people. They’re always easy to respect.

 

76 Canadians and Scandinavians Are Too “Nice”. It’s Time to Get Savage

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, well, I mean, you’ve kind of blown smoke up their arse a little bit now. They’re all right, they’re okay. They’re ookayy! Or whatever the fuck they say. I wish Canadians said “cunt” more! That’s my main critique of Canadians. I think there’s not enough vulgarity, not enough aggression. They’re too nice! It offends me as an Australian a little bit.

 

You know you see them, they got ice hockey going on, an aggressive national sport. If you look at their history, they’ve been great, they’ve got an incredible military history. They’re savages in their military history. Great, great victories in battle over the decades. So they’re obviously like, tough.

 

So I feel like they’re almost too nice. They’re kind of, almost like they let themselves be taken advantage of its like the great shame. Like it’s similar with Scandinavians, Scandinavians are so nice. And it’s a beautiful thing because that makes for a great society because if they’re living in a society full of their own kin, that pleasant nature, is fantastic!

 

But then under the current situation, it’s like, time to get mean! It’s time to get savage!

 

[2:22:57]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: You know, we must glorify hostility to outsiders. Hostility to outsiders must become a noble virtue, one expected of all of our kin.

 

Joel Davis: Mhm. Yes, it’s time to get mean Canadians! But Australia, I mean our issue is not so much that we’re too nice, it’s more that we’re too apathetic. We don’t care enough. That’s our problem, I think.

 

77 Superchat – Tips for Educating the Ladies on Our Politics?

top

 

Blair Cottrell: Too cynical as well. Most Aussies think:

 

“It’s all going to go to shit anyway. And yeah nothing ever changes, so why bother?”

 

There’s a bit of cynicism there. But Aaron, 32, just sent through 10 bucks and he asked an interesting question. Joel, he asks:

 

“Any tips for educating the ladies on our politics? HH!”

 

I’m of the opinion you can’t really or shouldn’t bother too much. How should I phrase this? I found there’s no real use ranting about politics or trying to educate any woman on your political views. I mean, you can talk to a woman about politics if she really wants to talk about that. But generally speaking, it’s better to just lead by example. It’s better to take care of yourself, demonstrate that you can take care of yourself, be in good health, be smart, be able to provide something of value to the woman that she can see value in. I don’t know, it’s like I’ve never really seen much point in talking to women about politics, put it that way. It’s like not something that I’ve done a great deal because I see that they’re just not that interested. They’re usually interested in talking about other things.

 

And I talk about, think about politics all the time. It’s like I’m always inside my own head about it. And I network with and deal with people for political purposes all the time as well. It’s probably my primary interest still in life. And so at the end of the day, I don’t want to go home and sit with my girlfriend and talk about politics as well. I want to remove myself from that world. And I see women as being kind of outside of the world of politics. Almost like a period of relief from politics. That’s how I feel about it. What do you reckon?

 

Joel Davis: Personally, I never stop talking about the subjects that matter to me. So women are subjected to those same subjects. And usually if a woman likes me, then they want to hear about it anyway because they just kind of like hearing you mansplain. But it’s a distinction, I guess, between talking to women who don’t already like, want to have sex with you or are having sex with you, and talking like general women in the community. Because if a woman is into you, then she’ll just kind of go along like she’s probably go along with having a discussion about whatever you want to talk about because obviously you’ve got a close relationship. So I don’t think you really need advice on that. Just like, just talk about what you think.

 

But when it comes to general women, like out in the community, I think women respond better to putting things in the language of care. So talk about you know, talk about kind of like the Righteous reasons why certain people you care about are getting fucking over. Whether it be your family’s future, whether it be victims of immigrant crime, whatever, White people collectively, whatever. And talk about how you care about these groups and how that’s what motivates you and so on. I think that can bring you come across a lot more sympathetically and I think put it to them. If they challenge you, say:

 

“What about what this person has suffered? Or what about this group of people? Don’t they deserve this? Don’t they deserve that?”

 

Usually this kind of framing is more persuasive, I think, to the feminine psyche. Because the feminine psyche processes, you know, social realities more through that prism than maybe how you would talk about it with men. So I don’t know. That’s based my basic take. I mean, it’s kind of obvious, right? But it’s true.

 

Blair Cottrell: A woman just needs to be ethnically aware. Ethnically aware is kind of like bare minimum. If a woman is not ethnically aware, at least, it’s like I can’t even be bothered. I can’t be bothered even having a conversation with her about anything. Because women should have good instincts. It’s of the female nature to be in tune with one’s instinct rather than be intellectualising everything and being sort of consciously processing what they’re observing through their senses. Women are very instinctual creatures. And if a woman can’t even be in touch with their own ethnic identity. If she can’t even acknowledge it or feel connected to that, then it’s like too far gone, man! [chuckling] I just can’t deal with that.

 

Joel Davis: So I think women are also receptive to when, if you talk about like the issues with race mixing and like the desire to have children that, maintain your ancestry and that have certain traits that you have or that your family has, …

 

[2:28:21]

 

Blair Cottrell: Even the anti-racist ones, even the woman women who masquerade as anti-racists, as soon as you bring up the inheritance of certain ethnic traits that they possess, like they’re always very interested in children looking like them. Usually they’re interested in passing on their blue eyes or their blond hair. They want to do that! Which just goes to show their instinct always trumps whatever they say they believe, which is what I was trying to get at before. The words women speak is never as powerful or as effective or influential over their actions as their instinct.

 

78 Superchat – My Lefty Girlfriend Told Me That She Hates Jews

top

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, no, I mean that’s definitely the case.

 

Anyway, Rigo Weber said:

 

“I just told my girlfriend that I’m currently looking into the true history of Hitler and the jews. And to my surprise, she told me that she hates jews. I found this surprising. And she’s always been a real Lefty.”

 

Well it’s not that surprising that Lefties are developing anti-semitic attitudes. I mean, generally Lefties they hate Israel. If they hate capitalism, they probably have noticed that a lot of these capitalists are jewish. There’s something jewish about capitalism, about international finance, etc.

 

So yeah, there’s certain demographics of people where it’s easier to talk to them about jews than it is to talk to them about race. And there’s other demographics where it’s easier to talk to them about race than about jews. And usually people that are more conservative, it’s easier to get to talk to them about race than it is about jews. And it’s easier inverse of people that are more of a Left-wing bias.

 

So yeah, that doesn’t surprise me. But yeah, I mean, if it’s your girlfriend, she’s gonna, even if she doesn’t agree with you, she’s gonna be open with you and like, she’s gonna trust you enough to say things that she wouldn’t say in polite company. Or she’ll like, hear you out, obviously, so you can be a lot more frank. You shouldn’t be afraid of being able to talk about how you really feel with your own girlfriend. That’s kind of fucked up!

 

79 Blair and Joel’s Interactions with Women

top

 

Blair Cottrell: I’ve never known a girl who’s like, strongly disagreed with me on anything. I’ve never been in an interaction with a female where we’ve argued about something like some social ideal, political idea, philosophy, nothing! I think when women like you, they tend to be more accepting of whatever it is you’re saying. They mimic your ideas. It’s always been really difficult for me to actually argue with a woman. I don’t even want to! Maybe that’s why. I don’t know.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, I don’t know. I think usually I’ve always dated women who have similar political proclivities. Like, may not be like full Nazis or whatever, but they’ve always been pretty, like, Right-wing and so haven’t been offended by my views on things and then being exposed to me. Anyone who’s exposed to me on a long enough timeline basically becomes a Nazi.

 

So, yeah, whether I’m having sex or not.

 

Blair Cottrell: Have you ever just asked people basic questions and watch them become frustrated by actually thinking about the answer to your question and realising how stupid it sounds?

 

Like, for example, you might be talking to some girl and she’s trying to tell you about how climate change is going to destroy the world or something. And you’ll ask her a simple question like:

 

“Okay, where did you get that information?”

 

And she’d be like:

 

“Oh, well, I was in university and this, like Professor told me.”

 

Or as part of some course or something like that. Okay:

 

“Well, where did that information come from, though? Where did they get it from?”

 

And they don’t actually, a lot of the time, like, as you just develop that line of questioning they get frustrated because they realise that it’s actually unreasonable to believe what they believe based on the sources that have, like, pass down that information to them because they can’t actually verify the sources. And by just asking them to explore those sources for a moment, they become visibly frustrated. Have you experienced that?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Like, so usually what has happened when I’ve been in social situations where there’s like, Leftist women, is they just kind of like start crying and then go to the bathroom or something. Or just basically act like as if I just did this horrible thing to them and then try and like act like a victim and then hope that someone like cucks out and sympathises with them because they’re not equipped to actually engage me in debate or critical discussion. That’s pretty much what happens every single time. So I think I have intimidating aura when it comes to debating. People don’t really like debating me.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh yeah! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: I don’t get people who are like political to debate me at this point. Like no one wants to debate me, so.

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, everyone has their strengths and yours is arguing a point. And you know any person in touch with some semblance of common sense knows that there are some armies not to engage, there are some battles not to fight.

 

And one of the battles not to fight in my opinion is entering into open debate with Joel Davis! [chuckling] Yeah, everyone’s good at something.

 

Joel Davis: Anyway, we’ve been going for two and a half hours.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, yeah.

 

80 Update on Tom Sewell’s Court Case – Prosecution Will Drop Case If Doesn’t Claim Legal Fees

top

 

Joel Davis: I hope everyone enjoyed the show. Like I said, Monday night our time late Monday night I’ll do a one off stream with Thomas777. By the way, update. Tom Sewell he had caught this week on Thursday another pre-trial conference, and it got basically adjourned for another week. Because basically what happened is that the prosecution offered to drop the charges against Tom if he wouldn’t pursue them for legal costs. So they were like we wouldn’t want to pay your lawyer fees for all us dicking you around for the last four months but we’re willing to drop the charge. Meaning like obviously he didn’t do it. And, he was like:

 

“No, you’re going to pay my legal fees, or you can’t like drop the charge, make me pay lawyer fees and then not front up for it.”

 

And so now the prosecution needs another week apparently to figure out whether it wants to pay his legal fees or not so what a joke, the legal process can be! But hopefully that resolves itself soon and we’ll have Tom on the show again soon.

 

81 Jacob Hersant Has Court Re Appealing His Roman Salute Sentence

top

 

Also Jacob Hersant has court this week. I can’t remember which day. Do you remember the dates?

 

[2:35:41]

 

Blair Cottrell: What dates?

 

Joel Davis: Hersant has court next week.

 

Blair Cottrell: I thought you were going to say has “caught something”. Not has like “court”, legal.

 

Joel Davis: No, no, no, no! He was sentenced to one month in prison for the Roman salute but then appealed it to the county court. The county court is going to conduct the trial this coming week.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know.

 

Joel Davis: I think it might come on the 10th, but we’ll update you.

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know, you’ll have to ask him.

 

Joel Davis: I’m going to go down there, at least one of the days, it’s like a three day trial, so I’m probably not going to sit through all three days of the trial. But I’m going to go down there and suss out what’s going on and give Jacob some support. And, we’ll cover it and we’ll report to you what’s happening. So that should be interesting if he wins or not. Obviously it’s a constitutional case as well. So that makes it doubly interesting. It’s challenging the Constitutionality of the act itself.

 

So that’s all happening this week. So there’s going to be some interesting kind of legal wranglings through next week for Tom and Jacob. And we’ll, yeah, probably cover that next week on the show. Plus whatever else is going down. There’s always something interesting. It never stops.

 

Thank God! We continuously make news because there really isn’t that much news in Australian politics.

 

Blair Cottrell: You imagine how boring, …

 

Joel Davis: Imagine if we had to log in and talk about how:

 

“Oh, Gerard Rennick was talking shit about Pauline Hanson on Twitter this week. Oh, wow!”

 

Blair Cottrell: How boring would Australian politics be if there was no NSN [National Socialist Network]? There’s been nothing happening! You just have your Sky News shills. I don’t even want to imagine it. I’m thankful for the current political situation, for you guys doing what you do. It makes things very interesting. Keeps pushing boundaries, which I’ve always been sympathetic to that kind of activity. Yeah.

 

Thanks for joining us guys. It’s been a cosy night. It’s been a good stream. We’ve gone for a little longer than we usually do, and I guess we’ll see you guys next week, right?

 

Is there anything else, Joel, before we finish up?

 

82 On the Physical Characteristics of Some Nationalists

top

 

Joel Davis: No. I see people are arguing in the chat. Megawatts says:

 

“I’m 190 centimetres built built beast. But I don’t seem like it from the face.”

 

But then Skinhead Friend said:

 

“I’m only three metres tall. So it’s like the opposite of an Anglo king you see, on the battlefield, Joel is taller IRL than in lore.”

 

Anyway, it’s kind of humourous, it’s ambiguous.

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel’s this weird blend between nerd and Chad, I don’t know, he’s like multifaceted, personality. But you get some of those. I’ve always noticed that whenever you get, any sort of character in politics which becomes prominent for whatever reason, they sometimes a blend of several different stereotypes. They never kind of, they’re never one dimensional and there’s something to be said for that.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I feel like most, it’s interesting too. Like most nationalists, prominent nationalists are usually pretty tall. Like Keith Woods is like six-five. You’re like six-four. I know Ferryman from Canada is like six-four. Hersant and myself are pretty tall. We’re over six, well over six foot. Tom Sewell’s the only prominent [chuckling] I could think of actually he’s under six foot, but he makes up for it because he could probably bash all of us! So that’s the thing, like you know.

 

Blair Cottrell: Everyone thinks Tom’s short.

 

Joel Davis: But it’s just like all these mates are too tall! It’s just kind of not fair really. He’s like normal size.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s one of the things. But he also has like it’s the way he’s built because he’s so compact and like square built, strong shoulders, strong legs and shit! I think because he has the long torso, like if Tom and I sit next to each other, he literally looks taller than me because he’s got like a long torso and he sits upright, he’s got good posture. Whereas I slouch and all my height is in my legs. If I sit down I look shorter than him. So it’s a weird sort of aesthetic thing where, …

 

Joel Davis: He’s not such a good squat because he’s got those squatter’s legs.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, he’s got like the most perfect squat I’ve ever seen! So I don’t know, everyone’s got their strengths.

 

But yeah, I suppose we’ll see you guys next week. We’ll wrap it up there. I need to go to the bathroom.

 

Joel Davis: White power! Blood and honour! Hail Hitler! It’s all happening.

 

Blair Cottrell: See you guys.

 

 

[2:40:27]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Rumble Comments

top

(Comments as of 6/15/2025 = 43)

johnnyboy2324
Supporter
3 days ago
the succulent meal guy, recently did an interview and admitted that he was robbing safes. he just got out of prison
0 likes

Report
ArchipelagoWoes
Supporter+
4 days ago
I know a couple Davis’s here in Pennsylvania. Good people
0 likes

Report
MrAnglo
Supporter
5 days ago
Never Compromise and Cuck. That is your Tactic. End of Discussion.
0 likes

Report
katana17
5 days ago
[Joel Davis – Tactical N-Word – Jun 6, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/06/08/joel-davis-tactical-n-word-jun-6-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss the tactical use of the N-word as used by NSN members in Melbourne with their Ban Niggers Not Machetes banner drop in front of a major shopping centre where Sudanese had engaged in a machete fight. See Table of Contents for points discussed. – KATANA]
01 Clip of Trump Using the N-Word
02 Trump vs Musk Feud
03 Clip of NSN Rally in Melbourne – Ban Niggers Not Machetes
04 Tactical Use of the N-Word, Pros and Cons
05 Why the Fuck Are There Africans in Australia!
06 Whites created the problems in the rest of the world through our expansionism and colonialism?
07 How Irish are you? Joel and Blair’s ancestry
08 DNA labs selling your data to interested parties
09 History of the name Davis
10 Davises in the US had slaves resulting in niggers having the name!
11 Whites, jews, blacks and the slave trade
12 Instagram and the very positive response to the Ban Niggers Not Machetes action
13 Discussion on the Effective Use of the N-Word and Media Response
14 Sudanese in Pakenham Attacking White High School Kids at Party
15 Machete Fight at Northland Shopping Centre
16 Magistrates in Victoria Are Being Trained in Diversity and Inclusion to Go Easy on Immigrants
17 The Problem of Anti-Racism Being Championed by Whites
(Cont’d)
[TRANSCRIPT – Words: 27,900 – Duration: 160 mins]
0 likes

FJB6666
5 days ago
Joel looks like a Sikh pajeet with that black beeny on.
0 likes

Report
cowolf
6 days ago
Speaking about the tactics. (I don’t know if you guys even read the comments here, never seen any response.) Sorry but I think you have to get rid of Hitler connotation (images, symbols, at least modify Roman salute), and this is from the supporter of the White cause, an European here. I haven’t seen any honest analysis of what Hitler actually did wrong. I mean, you have literally unlimited amount of material condemning Hitler and making him the greatest villain of all time (which he wasn’t, probably Stalin was) but it all comes from the Hitler’s enemies, it all comes from the WWII winners. What I want to hear is a reflection on Hitler’s mistakes from the Hitler’s supporters. And that is pretty obvious that you can’t go anywhere if you don’t know what went wrong in the first place and don’t want to repeat the mistakes. I watched the whole 12 hours of ‘Europa The Last Battle’ and while it is quite interesting there’s not a single word on what went wrong and why. For most of the countries of anti-German coalition of WWII Hitler will never be acceptable. You may not care that much but that’d be already the first problem: Whites need to learn how to make allies and how to support each other. So first of all, Hitler was not pro-White, he was only pro-German. That’s why he cannot be a unifying figure for all Whites. Every country Hitler attacked was at the time 100% White and nearly 100% Christian. Basically Germany didn’t kill a single non-white during the whole war, it was all White genocide. And tell me how can you blame everything on Jews then make ally with Soviet Union and bomb, burn and loot Poland? The biggest mistake Hitler did was to attack Poland, then it all went downhill. I am happy to hear any constructive opinions.
1 like

Report
‹ Hide 2 replies
CreateAnArmyToSaveWhites
6 days ago
I don’t know if it helps but WW2 was mostly about weakening Europe to then strengthen and later weaken the United States (ending segregation, making racism illegal, mass immigration, etc). Hitler could have kept his country on par with the United States without engaging in any war and could have kept his country purely white (if you consider the brown eye’d people white) but he didn’t. He decided to put it in harm’s way by attacking the entire White world FOR ABSOLUTELY NO REASON. Hitler’s people weren’t on the verge of becoming minorities like they are now.. (THANKS TO HITLER) You’d have to be foolish as hell to think Hitler cared about White people or Germany. You’d also have to be pretty dim to think Hitler didn’t massively assist the Jews with his rhetoric and acts against them. Israel was created not long after WW2. Any criticism of Jews or nonwhites in general is the most perceived evil thing anyone can do now thanks to Hitler. Whereas before, it was nothing but common sense to criticize and to attack one’s enemy. I also don’t think Stalin is as evil as Hitler because Stalin didn’t make White people evil by being racist and losing a war. Good luck in life fellow white.
1 like

Report
johnnyboy2324
Supporter
3 days ago
optics cuck. stop being a pussy.
0 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
cowolf
3 days ago
I asked specifically for ‘constructive opinions’ so get lost and stop being a low IQ retard.
0 likes

Report
BeornBeorning
6 days ago
Blair was talking about my brown college room mate. White people are stupid suckers handing out freebies to him.
0 likes

Report
predatorstomperrr
6 days ago
I’m an American white man and all my friends watch you while we watch ufc. Love you Joel! Don’t ever stop we cna win
0 likes

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
The parks r inaccessible BC we r all destined to 15 mins Eutopean cities where you will own nothing & be happy. If you leave more than you r allowed you will pay for it.
0 likes

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
When I worked with Redskins the conclusion I came to was they are embarrassed of their past. I saw more racism in nons all my life. Whites are hated BC they ARE superior.
1 like

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
Who owns Ayers Rock?
0 likes

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
Who misses military style education system? It’s the I’m ok ur ok bs ruining & satanizing society.
1 like

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
Just bought a cemetery plot where my great grandparents/grandparents/mother/sister are buried. All Catholics are buried there but BC the cemetery was turned over to township with woke employees it’s now a free for all like the ppl buried there have been excommunicated or something. My ancestors were the ones who had to hike in 10miles of bush with bags of flour on their backs to create farmland, roads & not mudhuts. Do you guys not know the PCR tests of last 4 yrs was taking everyone’s DNA to assess mRNA jabs while causing brain damage.
0 likes

Report
007lyse
6 days ago
The guys I follow are bent on dead weight lifting. I have a bunch of dead weights as friends. Lol Do you want them to lift BC I think it’s not being able to lift it’s about endurance. I was blessed to have the company of big strong guys on a 20km hike to have them barfing their under duress guts out all stressed/burnt out having the priest yelling “Just put one foot in front of the other” trying to avoid airlift out. I was 65 yo & could have redid the hike. Heard yrs later how it took a bunch of younger kids 3 days & 2 camping nites to do it. Lol. And boomers get constant lashings. I guess some yuppy boomers deserve it.
1 like

Report
Sinceresniper
6 days ago
Cottrell’s are also Jewish without being disrespectful to Blair.
0 likes

Report
Sinceresniper
6 days ago
The Normans fought a bigger battle in Durres Albania in 1081 against the Eastern Roman empire so Norman’s decendants are there also.
0 likes

Report
Nekropiate
6 days ago
Total support from the states!
0 likes

Report
Nekropiate
6 days ago
Total support from the states! WPWW o/ Hail Victory!
0 likes

Report
newgerman
6 days ago
ban nz not machetes…says it all in four words AAAAA+++++++
0 likes

Report
basedrespillzeus22
6 days ago
Great stream lads
0 likes

Report
GhostDogMan
Supporter++
1 week ago
lol. You guys are in Winter!! I just remember you are our Polar opposite brethren!
3 likes

Report
A655321
1 week ago
Blair, you don’t live in a traditional democracy anymore do you… Like my country you in a “Liberal democracy,” which exists to constrain the majority, turning the state into a referee for protected classes and global norms, rather than an instrument of national will. The government could care less if we are all replaced.
4 likes

Report
palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
Pakenham was a beautiful area back in the Australian days. Ironically, it was a place the youth of old Melbourne would run to for sporting fun on the weekends.
1 like

Report
palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
I wanna hear from the banner offended as their spleen is ruptured by a multiculturally enriched machete thrust.
1 like

Report
akdjfhgpjksdnkjnsdfg
1 week ago
I want to hear the NSN policies on the Covid jew-juice. Materialistic Jew-Pharma is going to ethnically cleanse us all, and a lot of people are angry and activated by the government policies. There is no pushback/accountability.
-1 likes

Report
mrwordsworth
1 week ago
it’s pronounced took
0 likes

Report
1488Brother
1 week ago
Yo four ads is crazy before I can get to a tactical N word.
0 likes

Report
Motion937
1 week ago
It isn’t a damn machete crisis. It is a niggerdom crisis. I need my machetes for clearing brush. I don’t need the negroes/Muslims. They provide no value to anyone.
21 likes

Report
Kroninn
Supporter
1 week ago
Exactly, Blair. Heat is for browns.
3 likes

Report
‹ Hide 1 reply
evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 week ago
TIL “caught” and “court” are homophones in Australian English. W North American English for clarity.
0 likes

Report
palacepony
Supporter
1 week ago
Trump/Elon distraction from real issue? – Mass surveillance/ PALANTIR Trump bill measures; https://youtu.be/Fg1JZDIconk?si=BGA8h
-1 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
ProvingNihil
1 week ago
Yeah my Nationalist account on IG was banned, hell also I was private.
1 like

Report
evon626
VerifiedSupporter++
1 week ago
TIL about KIN-dness.
-1 likes

Report
BlueNorth88
1 week ago
About censorship also, it can give content creators a kind of glamour. Look how Tommy and others milk it to death when it happens. Also the guys that follow to any smaller platform and remain loyal are true followers.
1 like

Report
EarthlingCarl
1 week ago
Blacks in London, Detroit and now Melbourne, all with the same result. Almost like race is the problem and Magic Soil is a myth.
11 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
EarthlingCarl
1 week ago
Why has Blair got a tea cosy on his head? lol
4 likes

Report
› Show 1 reply
Otoya_Yamaguchi_G00k
1 week ago
Australia was invented and built by Europeans for Europeans only. https://odysee.com/@joeldavis:0/the-white-australia-policy-%28feat.:6
9 likes

Report
katana17
1 week ago
[Joel Davis – Symbolic Victory – May 30, 2025 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2025/06/02/joel-davis-symbolic-victory-may-30-2025-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell discuss the following: 1. The show is resuming after a break, with the hosts discussing recent events.
2. Joel Davis mentions no longer having “onerous bail conditions”.
3. They discuss weightlifting and an upcoming competition.
4. Joel aims for a 220kg deadlift: “That’s my ideal. If I can hit 220 at nationals, I’ll be ecstatic!”
5. They discuss the challenges of heavy lifting and potential injuries.
6. They talk about a recent court appearance in Adelaide.
7. Joel describes interactions with journalists: “And these journalists, they’re all women. Sometimes in Melbourne, you get these really, like, soy, Lefty, ugly journalists.”
8. They discuss how charges against them are being dropped.
9. Joel criticises the police: “The South Australia Police are a bunch of scumbags!”
10. They discuss African gang violence in Australia.
11. Joel says: “Basically the only thing holding together our society right now is White guys who train because police don’t actually do anything at this point.”
12. They discuss the concept of “Anarcho Tyranny”.
13. Joel talks about attending an event at New South Wales Parliament.
14. They discuss the concept of Universal vs. Particular in philosophy and politics.
15. Joel says: “Until we can go back and say what the Nazi, like the kind of so-called “Nazi” coded what they asserted, that a particular nation can just be itself and assert itself on its own terms.”
16. They discuss the importance of asserting White Identity.
17. Joel criticises the Right-wing for constantly “cucking” to the morality of their enemies. (Cont’d)
1 like

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

 

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Joel Davis: It is another episode of the show. It is the 13 September 2024, and there’s a lot to get into tonight. Obviously, the Australian government this week has been making a lot of moves on the censorship front. They finally put the Bill before Parliament to censor the Internet, basically against so-called “misinformation and disinformation”. They’ve also announced plans to bring in an age limit for social media. And it effectively bans people under a certain age, which they didn’t actually specify, presumably 16 or 15 or somewhere in that vein, from using social media, which a lot of people, I think correctly think is a pretext to bring in digital ID requirements, to use social media, to kind of tie everyone to their identification for what they post online.

 

And in addition to that, also, there’s been some other things on that front. So we’ll discuss all of that, as well as this crazy story out of America. Haitians eating cats, but not, are they just eating cats like the kind of the US government and certain, let’s be real, Catholic charities and other so-called refugee charities, so to speak, have conspired to dump 20,000 Haitians in this town called Springfield in Ohio, in America, which is a town that I think only had a population of like 60,000 people to begin with. It’s not a big town.

 

And so now they’ve just been inundated with Haitians and the whole town is gone to shit, basically. And that’s been a very big story over the past week.

 

So that’s a very interesting story, I think.

 

So those are probably the big stories from this week. I would say. There’s been some other things as well, but there’s a lot to chew on just there. So we’ll probably cover that and maybe some other things.

 

But, you know, as the title of the show says, usually you tune in not really for a coverage of the news, but for the tangents that we inevitably go on. And that’s probably what makes the show so good to listen to.

 

So let’s begin with a bit of a tangent. How are you guys doing?

 

Blair Cottrell: How you doing, Tom? How you feeling?

 

Joel Davis: Tom? You like muted dude!

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, sorry. I was just replying to someone in the chat. They asked us to spurg out about the “Holocaust”. And I said:

 

“Maybe at the end we’ll do it.”

 

Yeah, I mean, he was saying something like:

 

“Can you once and for all put it to bed?”

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s too early.

 

Joel Davis: Once we put it to bed, then it’s finally done. Then the jewish, …

 

Thomas Sewell: And it’ll be finally done.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s too early in the evening, actually.

 

Thomas Sewell: Didn’t we, in the, …

 

Joel Davis: We didn’t really talk about the holocaust too much. We talked more about WWII. We didn’t specifically talk about the Holocaust.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, that’s true. We didn’t specifically talk about the Holocaust. Maybe we forget that a lot of our audience, they’re not in real life NatSoc circles, so they’ve never actually experienced the kind of real life Holocaust Holabonga debunking. Like, we’ve all experienced it like 500 times. So we’re over it! Like, every time we’re at a party, someone brings it up and then hear it all again and everyone chimes in.

 

And it’s like if you’re around Nazis in real life, you just, you hear it like probably once a week, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You become desensitisfied.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, you do. You’re kind of just over it. You’re like, it’s just a bygone thing. It’s like it’s obvious that it didn’t happen. And we could go into detail. We could do like top three favourite parts of the Holabonga.

 

Blair Cottrell: Hang on. I thought we were going to do this later. Are we doing it now or not? [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: No, later. Later! We’ll do it later!

 

Joel Davis: I would rather talk about why the Holocaust is a lot of BS than the Misinformation Bill:

 

“Oh, wow! We’re talking about this on the show like a year ago. Let’s just, let’s cover this again!”

 

One thing I will say about the Misinformation Bill, actually, let’s just maybe cover some news.

 

A lot of people have been reporting it, like, as if it’s a “hate speech Bill”. It is not a hate speech bill. The Bill does not authorize the government to go after private individuals for what they post online. It authorizes a regulatory body called the ACMA [Australian Communications and Media Authority], I believe, to basically go after the social media companies and impose government standards on their regulatory practices to try and basically force sites like Twitter and maybe even Rumble to take down certain kinds of content and change their moderation policies to become more strict and in line with the kind of policies that you see on Facebook or Instagram or YouTube, which are more in line with what the government wants.

 

[* The Australian Communications and Media Authority is an Australian government statutory authority within the Communications portfolio. ACMA was formed on 1 July 2005 with the merger of the Australian Broadcasting Authority and the Australian Communications Authority. ACMA is responsible for collecting broadcasting, radiocommunication and telecommunication taxes, and regulating Australian media.]

 

So that’s actually what the Bill is about. Obviously, that’s a bad thing, but it’s not the same thing as the government’s going to come knock on your door because you made a misinformation Twitter post. Not yet, anyway. That’s not what the Bill says.

 

Blair Cottrell: So why aren’t they doing that already? Well, with racist posts, anyway. Looking here online, …

 

Joel Davis: No, I can’t think of one person in Australia that has been door knocked over a racist Twitter post. Has that ever happened that you guys know?

 

Blair Cottrell: I mean, throughout the West, like Western civilisation, I’ve heard of it happening.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it happens in Britain, but it doesn’t happen in Australia.

 

So I don’t think we should be fear mongering about that being that can happen, because then people will be afraid to say things on the Internet. We don’t want them to be afraid to say things. It’s not illegal. You’re not going to get door knocked over something you send. Unless you’re, like, full on FED posting and advocating for killing people or something like crazy like that, you’re not going to get door knocked.

 

[05:34]

 

Thomas Sewell: I think people should be very careful, even in Australia, especially if they own legally owned firearms, they should be very careful what they put on Facebook, because there has been people that have been door knocked for things that I wouldn’t say were explicit calls to violence. They were more just like airing frustrations, like natural airing of frustrations on social media posts. There has been some people that have been door knocked and have lost their., … And they haven’t been involved with organisations. They’re just individuals on the Internet. They’ve got legal firearms and the government has used their Facebook posts, specifically Facebook. I don’t know of any other social media, but I know specifically Facebook posts to then say that they’re no longer fit and proper, so they can no longer hold the firearms, legal firearms.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. You’re not allowed to have emotions or opinions if you own guns legally.

 

Thomas Sewell: So you have to be very careful, yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: So when you said ACMA, I thought, where have I heard that before?

 

So I looked it up and I saw, it’s the Australian Communications and Media Authority. And then I remembered the ACMA was consulted by Sky News after my appearance on Sky News, namely Adam Giles show. When was that, Tom? That was about four or four years ago now, maybe five years ago?

 

Thomas Sewell: 2018

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. And they ended up ruling that there was nothing wrong with my appearance on Adam Giles show. And there was no actual reason to ban me or to take any action. But their ruling took, like, six to eight months to come through, so by that time, everyone had moved on, so it didn’t really matter.

 

But interesting that that’s going to be the agency that’s going to be trusted to hold platform providers to account for what they’re allowing to be posted on those platforms. Obviously, the ACMA has maybe in recent years, been kind of populated, you might say, by the right kind of (((people))) that the government needs it to have.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. It’s under their control too. So they could, if they’re not happy with the AMCA not sufficiently regulating so-called “disinformation”, which actually is a total misnomer because what the Bill outlines is that basically:

 

“Causing offence to any protected group is a form of disinformation.”

 

Thomas Sewell: Joel as just disconnected. He’s reconnected. Joel is back.

 

Joel Davis: Did I disconnect?

 

Blair Cottrell: Not on my end you didn’t. Yeah, you were fine on my end for some reason.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, maybe I disconnected.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, maybe you did.

 

Anyway, my, what I was saying was that you, disinformation and misinformation is something that is interpreted as literally anything that offends any kind of minority or protected group or people of a particular, even people of a particular political status, I think it said in the legislation. So you could construe almost anything as “causing harm” is actually the term that it uses. Causing harm to any of these groups. There’s a way that you can rationalise taking almost any content down on those pretexts. At least someone is going to “feel harmed” by almost any, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Joel, Joel, what about the harm that can potentially be caused, according to the contents of the bill, to bankers and, what do they call it? The economic market?

 

So you’re not allowed to undermine public confidence in banks or Australia’s economic markets! What does that mean? [chuckling] You’re not allowed to forecast a recession?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly! The Bill would basically make it possible for them to take down any kind of criticism of government health mandates, climate change, … So if you criticise vaccines or climate change or any of these things, if you go against the mainstream consensus on any of these issues, they could classify all of these things as “misinformation” or “disinformation” or whatever. The legislation is so broad, they can’t take anything down off the Internet that they want to.

 

But the thing is they can’t directly take it down. The legislation doesn’t basically give the AMCA the right to specifically say:

 

“I want this taken down. This post, this post, this post!”

 

What the legislation authorizes them to do is to basically provide guidelines to the social media companies on what they should be taking down.

 

So it’s kind of a little bit convoluted.

 

Blair Cottrell: Didn’t it say 5% of the revenue from the platform provider in question can be taken as a fine by the media association or the ACMA? Is that what the legislation said?

 

[10:07]

 

Joel Davis: So that’s basically what they’re going to do. And I would anticipate that. Elon Musk has already criticised the legislation multiple times. Unfortunately, he decided to say “fascism” as his form of criticism of this bill. I mean, how that’s “fascism”, I don’t really understand. Like the Internet, when fascist regimes existed, I don’t understand, …

 

But anyway, it’s a bommerism. But the point is that what this is actually is kind of liberalism, it’s socialism.

 

But anyway, the point is that the bill. Yeah. It ultimately is only as powerful as what the Australian government’s power is, which over a company that’s based in a foreign country, is quite limited.

 

So at the end of the day, all the servers for all these social media companies are hosted in foreign countries, and they can’t pull Elon Musk before a court and tell him what to do on his American website.

 

So all they can do is maybe mess with Australian based revenue streams into X which probably aren’t that substantial. I would imagine only a very small portion of how much revenue they raise comes from Australia. So they’re only going to take like, 5%. I could very much envisage Elon Musk basically just wearing it and telling them to get fucked, because it really would be such a minute amount of Twitter’s overall revenue.

 

So I don’t know if it’s actually that big of a deal. It could be a whole big song and dance of almost nothing, to be honest. We’ll see how it plays out.

 

Blair Cottrell: Who was that woman reading out the Bill in Parliament? What, they don’t read out the whole bill, but the preface for the bill. The preface for the bill. Who was that woman? Do we know anything about her? She had one of those toxic haircuts. Looked like the kind of woman.

 

Joel Davis: The kind of woman that would be in the government?

 

Blair Cottrell: In the government, in a high school. Yeah. Why do all women look like that? Why do all women, like government women, look like that? They all look like clones of each other, don’t they?

 

Joel Davis: Hot chicks, don’t want to go and become part of the government!

 

Blair Cottrell: No, it’s not. It’s more than that, it’s more than just not being attractive. It’s like they’re a whole different race. It’s like they’ve taken their the idea that they’re a member of this elitist superclass to the next level. And they’ve actually tried to create a physical, observable identity out of that liberal superclass. It’s like they’re a whole different race! The way they think, the way they look, the way they behave, it’s totally alien. It’s really weird!

 

Joel Davis: There’s a certain kind of allure that for a certain personality type, having an official title where you wear a pantsuit and you get to be an official title:

 

“Oh, look how successful I am! Look how prominent I am! Because I have of this position!”

 

Whether it be like a CEO of a large corporation or being in the government or being the principal of a high school or something like this. A so-called high status position within the system. Someone who’s kind of a loser that doesn’t really have any kind of normal, markable way within the culture of being kind of liked or affirmed or validated. They find a way:

 

“Well, if I just follow all these bureaucratic procedures and cross my t’s and dot my I’s, then I can get this piece of status, and then I can become important. And then all these people have to pretend. Have to kiss my arse and pretend that I matter, and I can be, oh, I’m such an inspiration for women everywhere because look at me! I’ve become the Member of Parliament, and now I’m the Minister for Education!”

 

Or some bullshit title or whatever that they get given.

 

And so it gives them this inflated sense of ego. Which indicates that something is quite wrong with them, that they can’t find meaning or validation in their life in any kind of normal, healthy channel. I think that really explains, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe it’s the default reaction to not attracting a partner or not being able to attract a partner or not presenting yourself as useful to. I don’t know, but, like, I couldn’t imagine anything worse. What you said there, where you said they’re aiming for a title or position where from they can force other people to be nice to them and everyone has to pretend to like them. I would hate that! I would hate that! I want to hear what people really think. I don’t want people pretending to like me.

 

Like, I don’t know where you guys stand on that. I think you would agree that there could be nothing worse than having sycophants just blowing smoke up your ass, just talking shit! Like, you want to hear what people really think, right? You want people to be honest. But, well, that’s just me.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. You see these women everywhere. They’re the stereotypical corporate, HR, or corporate governance lady. They’re in actual government. They’re in school, education, governance.

 

So I’ll give you an example recently, and I’ve seen the photo of this lady, and she looked exactly as Beck [Tom’s wife] described her. Beck obviously works part time consulting within the education system. And I’m sure the Lefties will try and dox that and stop that. I don’t give a fuck! [chuckling] Like, awesome! I hope she loses her job.

 

No, seriously. But no, she just does it not just out of the goodness of her heart. It is important to her to just stay within the industry and just keep tabs on it to see how fucking far it’s falling.

 

But she is working at a school at the moment. The principal’s a man and he’s currently, … I don’t know how much I can say legally, I guess I’m not naming names, so I can say whatever I want. But he’s currently under investigation for paedophilia. The principal.

 

And so the vice principal’s had to step up and is taking over the school. And all the staff hate the vice principal. It’s a woman. She doesn’t have children. She’s in her forties. And she has that haircut that you described, and she has that attitude that we all understand.

 

And all of her staff, mostly female. Most of the staff are female at the school. They are getting physically assaulted by students. And we’re talking, I’m pretty sure it’s a primary school. So they’re getting physically assaulted by grade twos, grade threes, grade fours, like, incessantly. And they are being told, …

 

Blair Cottrell: What do you mean? The kids are beating up the teachers?

 

[16:34]

 

Thomas Sewell: The kids are physically attacking the teachers. They’re kicking and punching the teachers. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: [chuckling] Okay! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: And so the school is in such a crisis that they’ve called for an independent consultant to come in and see what’s going on:

 

“Why are the children doing this? Clearly the gentle parenting and gentle schooling approach isn’t working. How do we rework it to make it work? How do we try and reinvent a wheel that’s broken?”

 

And it’s quite interesting because all the teachers are saying that every time they try to implement any sort of consequence, because they’re not allowed to say “disciplinary action” anymore, they now say “consequence”. They’re not allowed to implement any “consequence” for any negative behaviour, any “bad behaviour”. Bad behaviour basically doesn’t exist anymore in the primary school.

 

And this is a normal state school. This is a normal state school in Victoria. There’s no discipline. There’s not allowed to be any discipline. There’s no consequence. There’s not allowed to be any consequence.

 

And when the teachers report the violence that they’re receiving from the children to the acting principal, the acting principal basically tells them:

 

“Look, this conversation is too much for me. I’m getting anxious from this conversation. I’m going to have to leave this conversation.”

 

And then the principal then [chuckling] walks off and it’s fucking hilarious! But that’s what’s going on.

 

Blair Cottrell: What you’re saying is this school, this school was more functional under the leadership of an actual possible paedophile than it is from one of these corporate women! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. So the old principal, it’s kind of fucked up, but I’ll sidetrack that statement. But yes, but the other interesting factor with this principal is, or vice principal, acting principal is she is trying to get the principal’s job. So what she’s doing is she’s fudging the statistics. She’s pretending that there’s no incidences. She’s walking off on these conversations so that she doesn’t have to do her job, she doesn’t have to report the violence, she doesn’t have to report that the school is in chaos. The only team that’s been reported is this third party team. So obviously it’s all resting on her to write an honest report to the government to say:

 

“Hey, this is actually what’s going on at the school.”

 

So it’s interesting. [chuckling] It’s very interesting. [chuckling]

 

Also, Josh Roose*, who’s an anti-fascist researcher in the universities that regularly writes about how we’re all psychopaths and how we’re evil and the government should put us in jail. His wife is actually a principal at a school as well.

 

So that’s another interesting thing. [chuckling] It’s a small world! It’s a really small world!

 

[* Dr Josh Roose is a political sociologist and Associate Professor of Politics at the Alfred Deakin Institute for Citizenship and Globalisation at Deakin University, Melbourne. His research focuses on the intersection of politics, law, sociology, and religion with an emphasis on political and religious violent extremism and terrorism. He has also contributed expertise through interviews and background research for the full range of Australian television, print and radio outlets including ABC news programs including the 7.30 Program, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, 60 Minutes, The Guardian,  SBS, The Australian, and Sky News.]

 

Joel Davis: He wrote a whole article about how about me recently in the Australian. That was quite funny, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, Mr Roose.

 

Joel Davis: Because I ratioed him on Twitter. I said:

 

“Listen you should be thanking me that I’m giving you something to write about, otherwise you would be irrelevant. It wasn’t for people like us the Australian wouldn’t really be commissioning you to write any articles.”

 

And then he blocked me. So yes, he doesn’t have much of a sense of humour.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, he’s a pussy!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. It’s a picture of us cutting a Hitler cake in the like a swastika cake on Hitler’s birthday in the news.

 

So I thought that that that was pretty cool!

 

And what I didn’t like about the article, though, was he was making out like as if I’ve sprung to prominence after October 7. And my criticism of Israel, which didn’t really make any sense. Like, I barely talked about the Israel-Palestine conflict that much at all! Did a bit when it first kind of broke out. It was interesting to analyze, but it’s not really like my thing. So it was kind of bizarre! And he was trying to construe that somehow off the back of the anti-Israel movement we’re promoting neo-Nazism or something like that. If anything, it’s the other way around. We’re like:

 

“Oh, I guess we kind of hate Israel because it’s run by jews.”

 

But, you know, our focus isn’t really there. So he probably doesn’t actually watch the show as write an article that was that trash. These people get paid thousands of dollars to research us and they don’t even watch the show!

 

Meanwhile, poor old Miss Kaz Ross. She watches every single show religiously. Yeah, she’s watching right now! The media never ask her to write an article. [chuckling] She just gets upset how bad their articles are and how bad all these official researchers are.

 

[20:57]

 

Blair Cottrell: Who is Kaz Ross? Who’s that?

 

 

 

Joel Davis: She’s like the fat communist who, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, researcher.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, she’s obsessed with us. And she’s always posting on Twitter about us.

 

Thomas Sewell: She has a tenure at the University of Tasmania, I’m pretty sure.

 

Joel Davis: She knows us quite well. Like, her posts are actually kind of interesting. I mean, she has me blocked on Twitter. But occasionally Swindon will post a screenshot because he likes antagonizing her on the timeline in the group chat.

 

And so I’ll see some of what she has to say. And recently she did acknowledge that I’m an intelligent young gentleman. Apparently I’m an evil paedophile as well. But I’m an intelligent young gentleman.

 

So thanks for the compliment, Kaz. It’s nice. You obviously watch the show.

 

Blair Cottrell: Maybe Kaz is gradually, very gradually starting to turn? How long can you actually work on people like us before we start making a bit more sense than you expected?

 

Joel Davis: Maybe if she lost like 50 kilos, she’d come around?

 

Thomas Sewell: Our worldview would make sense if she lost 50 kilos. Because her main motivation is that she has a lack of self esteem because she’s a fat bitch! So she thinks she’s not allowed in the ethno-state. And so that’s why she wants to destroy the ethno-state. And this is just basic psychology 101. If you think you can’t go to the ethno-state, then you want to destroy the ethno-state.

 

And so that’s spiritual. That’s a spiritual construct.

 

So all these Antifa, all these communists, their fundamental motivation is they have low self esteem. They’re biological traitors. And they’re just like, well, misery loves company:

 

“If I can’t have it, no one can!”

 

You know:

 

“Why do these people got, ..!”

 

Like, it’s envy. It’s very strange. It’s hard to understand if you’ve got an attitude of:

 

“Okay, if I’m inferior, I should get good. If I’m not good at life, I should get better at life!”

 

But they don’t come at it from that angle. They just want to destroy the rich, eat the rich. They don’t even hate the jews because the jews are this, like, financial parasite that’s actually destroying society. They just hate the jews because the jews are better than them, or the jews are in positions of dominance or authority. They don’t hate the jews!

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s what we get accused of too. Like, we get accused of that.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, people mistake our motivations for being, like, anarchistic or communistic, but they’re not. Our motivations are we want a healthy society with a master morality. And a master morality doesn’t imply that we need to have slaves.

 

And I think that when a communist understands that, then they have a chance to sort of, maybe not empathize. That’s probably not the right word, but if they were accidently, … Not that we’re going to recruit many communists in the 21st century, obviously, Joel covered that last stream where the data shows that it’s a very different type of communist to 100 years ago.

 

But if there was some that got lost down the path, when they understand that our worldview isn’t about enslaving nons, it’s about just separating from and getting good, you know, it’ll make a bit more sense. Like, the fash doesn’t seem that bad anymore. Because that’s what they’re concerned about. They’ve got misdirected empathy.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Your modern communists, they’re less motivated by class war or even ideology than they are spurred on by dysgenics. It’s dysgenics which is at the heart of modern communism. It’s not even ideology. And in regards to the being fat, losing 50 kilos. You don’t lose 50 kilos, then adopt the National Socialist worldview. You start adopting the National Socialist worldview, then you lose the 50 kilos! That’s the process, in my opinion.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes!

 

Joel Davis: It’s a little bit of a chicken and an egg problem, though, because that being a fat piece of shit makes it so difficult for you to accept a worldview, …

 

Blair Cottrell: You have to hate yourself first, you need to hate that version of yourself first. You hate that! You keep looking at yourself in the mirror, and you say to yourself:

 

“Wow, I’m a piece of shit! I hate the way I look! I need to do something about this!”

 

And you say that every day until you start actually doing something to change it. You need to hate and reject the existing person you are, and the ideas that have led you to become that person, and completely, you know, re-imagine yourself. Right. That’s what I think for some of these.

 

[25:14]

 

Joel Davis: I mean, that’s good advice.

 

But actually what happens is that if you’re a fat piece of shit, nine times out of 10, is that you’d rather just cope about the fact that you’re a fat piece of shit by believing in a worldview which divorces you from nature in some way and nature’s inherent valuations. Because that’s what National Socialism is. National Socialism is an ideology that respects nature. That’s why, you know, Hitler’s view, he stated very explicitly, was that:

 

“A people that will not fight for its existence, does not deserve to live in this world.”

 

You have to earn your existence from nature through strength, through struggle. Otherwise, you can have no complaints if you’re wiped out of existence.

 

And the brutality of nature, which is a necessary brutality, because it’s a brutality that basically separates the wheat from the chaff that casts off weakness, that casts off basically erroneous directions that nature go in and refines the direction of life so that only the strong and the healthy can survive. And so nature has a way of kind of cleaning itself with its own inherent brutality and purifying itself with its own inherent brutality. And I learnt to kind of love and respect that aspect of nature. And to conform oneself to it by becoming strong and by becoming healthy and becoming worthy of existence, of continued existence.

 

That worldview is very difficult to embrace if you feel weak, if you feel disgusting, if you feel unhealthy. And there’s other worldviews that can come along and say:

 

“Well, actually, that whole idea of respecting nature is actually a form of domination, is actually a form of immoral brutality. People that lack empathy, that lack concern for other human beings, that don’t understand how difficult it is to be born in a certain body and to have certain natural handicaps or whatever, but we here in team communism or team Christianity or whatever, the form of egalitarianism team that you’re adopting, we care for all people, and we see value in everyone, and we want to lift everyone up together through this kind of, Chungus universal brotherhood of man or love or whatever!”

 

But of course, ultimately, that’s a total fraud. Ultimately, that doesn’t actually exist because nature actually exists.

 

And so all that ends up happening is that you facilitating parasitism and you’re facilitating the manipulation of outsider groups who will use that morality against you. Like we’re seeing with all of these non-Whites that are taking advantage of our egalitarian moment in the Western world. They can’t believe their luck at how stupid we are that we’re just giving away! We built the greatest civilisation in world history, and we’re just giving it away to them for free, and apologizing to them while we give it to them that we’re not giving it to you know, quickly enough and rapaciously enough or something.

 

Blair Cottrell: There’s many forces that will come at you in this world with the attractive idea that you aren’t your own responsibility and things aren’t your fault and your failures aren’t a result of your own weakness or naivety. But you’ve got to be careful that you don’t be swayed so easily by these forces. As Joel just pointed out, they come packaged in many different ways, sometimes as religions, sometimes as unions, and ideological groups. And sure, there’s collective oppression that you can challenge, but you can’t really be oppressed unless you’re weak enough to be in the first place.

 

So if you get strong enough, if you get good enough, then you’ll start doing the oppressing, and you really become immune to oppression.

 

And I think the world really is sort of “oppressed or be oppressed” in a way. You need to be in a position where you can crush any and all opponent that challenges you. Even if you don’t actually need to do it, you still have to have the capability of doing it. You have to keep yourself strong to prove your right to exist in this world.

 

And this glorification of weakness really irritates me in the West. It kills all incentive to perform when we’re rewarding and prioritizing the weakest and the sickest in our society. Where’s that going long term? The only logical conclusion is everyone’s going to try to be as weak and as sick as possible in order to be paid and rewarded for it.

 

Thomas Sewell: So I think it’s really important to know what’s going on in the schools. And I appreciated David Hiscock. He just wrote an article on that Misinformation Bill, just tying a few of these subjects together that have been floating around in the ether. But David Hiscock wrote about how the, … Sorry, not the Misinformation Bill, the banning of children from social media.

 

And I think that’s quite significant, because they’re still watching TV, they’re still getting programmed. They just don’t have the sort of Pandora’s box of the Internet.

 

And again, I’m not sure the exact age that they’re trying to legislate that children can’t use the Internet, but what they’re doing to children is ultimately what they’re trying to do to adults. And that was the point he was making in the article. And I think we discussed that on the show maybe two or three weeks ago as well.

 

This idea that Hitler talks about it, Stalin talks about it, and that’s not just because they’re both dictators by definition, but it is just commonly understood that who controls the youth, controls the future. And the way the Liberal tyranny or the anarcho-tyranny is doing it is they are making these changes. Oh, that’s right. I remember it was the show we talked about. It was when we talked about how the anti-bullying safe schools programme from six years ago has changed culture so significantly that children growing up that have had that change to the education curriculum are now adults. And now the government finally got the courage, or they finally got enough time behind them to start seriously changing how society functions in the same way that bureaucrats can just change how a high school works.

 

And a bit of a tangent, but a real world example I have of this is when I was in the army. When I got to battalion, when I marched out of training, we got pulled aside into a room by the lieutenant colonel, and he said, I think it was Forbes. And he died of cancer, conveniently. But he gave us a big speech about how:

 

“All the soldiers in the unit were cancer.”

 

That’s what he said to us. And we were, like, 18 years old. We just marched out of training. And he pulled all the new guys, because it was like about three or four Platoons* worth of new guys, new recruits, rocked up a battalion all at the same time. And he pulled us all into an auditorium and he said:

 

“All the soldiers just got back from Afghanistan. Basically, they’re cancer, they’re rotten, they’re no good. And basically I’m trying to get rid of them. And you guys are the future and you guys have been trained properly. And the army is going through some changes at the moment, and these people are trying to hold on to the old army. And what we need to do is have the new army. And you guys are the new army.”

 

[* In the Australian Army, an infantry Platoon has thirty-six soldiers organised into three eight-man sections and a twelve-man manoeuvre support section, with a lieutenant as Platoon commander and a sergeant as Platoon sergeant, accompanied by a Platoon signaller and sometimes a Platoon medic (full strength of forty men). A section comprises eight soldiers led by a corporal with a lance corporal as second in command. Each section has two fireteams (sometimes three) of four men, one led by the corporal and the other by the lance corporal. Each fireteam (also called a “brick” by Australian soldiers) has one soldier with an F89 Minimi LSW and the other three armed with F88 Steyr assault rifles. One rifle per fireteam has an attached 40 mm grenade launcher; one of the grenadiers is the lance corporal. Fireteam bravo has a HK417 7.62mm for the designated marksman role. More recently, the designated marksman of each Australian fireteam has been issued the HK417 in Afghanistan and possibly afterwards. The Platoon may also have three MAG 58 general-purpose machine guns, one M2 Browning heavy machine gun, or a Mk 19 grenade launcher at its disposal. Wikipedia]

 

And we told all the senior soldiers and they were like:

 

“Yeah, yeah, yeah, that’s Forbes. He’s a piece of shit! You know, good luck with him. Basically, we’re all leaving because we don’t want this guy as our commander. We’re all discharging, we’re all getting out of the army. And yeah, we just feel sorry for you and you guys because you don’t actually know what the army is. The thing you have joined is very different to what it was five years ago. It’s drastically changed in a very short period of time.”

 

[32:58]

 

 

And the army went from this boys club where it was like party hard, work hard, serve the country, do the hard yards. And it was this macho kind of warrior cult, and it just became PC. You’re basically a security guard for the state when they decide and when they don’t decide. And we’re going to be doing lots of humanitarian work and you’re kind of a bodyguard for like the UN humanitarian aid workers. And we’re going to transition away from a lot of this combat stuff. And we were infantry soldiers.

 

And I sensed this transition actually, when I applied because of dealing with the civilian recruiting agency and the kind of questions they would ask. It made me think, like:

 

“Am I joining the army or am I joining the Peace Corps?”

 

It was very strange, the questions. I won’t go into it. But I saw that firsthand. And I saw that when you drastically change the culture of an institution, you actually have to remove basically all the non-compliant manpower from the organisation and you have to restock the organisation with the new manpower that can be loyal to the institution, because it doesn’t even know what the old institution was like because it wasn’t around. And you’ve got this fresh slate.

 

And so that’s what’s happening at a macro level and at a micro level. So at a macro level, they’re replacing us, you know, ethnically. Like, the White people are getting replaced from Australia and Britain and Canada, America, Germany, wherever. We’re getting replaced, and they’re bringing in these migrants.

 

And one of the main reasons is that the White people are just the “cancer”. This is what our bureaucrats think of us. This is what the ruling elites think of us. Because White people want things like justice and fairness and freedom and honour and respect and rights and liberties! That’s what the White people want. But the Chinese and Indian bug people they don’t know. What the fuck does fairness and righteousness and justice mean to them? This isn’t in their psyche. This isn’t in their psyche. These words are Western words. These are Western concepts. These belong to us!

 

And so to change the culture into the tyranny that they’re trying to make, they need to replace us. And they can’t replace all the Whites all at once, so they got to brainwash them in school. And so we’re seeing the anarcho-tyranny playing out where you’ve got children. They can’t be punished for basically what is proto-criminal behaviour.

 

So that’s the anarchy. But they can be punished. If you say the word “gay”, I guarantee there’s a punishment for it. I guarantee there’s consequences. If you said the word “gay” in class, you get punished! But you punch the teacher:

 

“Oh, why are you feeling this way? What’s wrong? Tell us why you’re feeling this way.”

 

Joel Davis: See if you punch the gay kids?

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, I have one anecdotal story. We have run a similar. We haven’t run the experiment. I’m aware of an anecdotal, …

 

Blair Cottrell: We [chuckling] have some experience in this! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Ha! [chuckling] There were some gay jews that tried to run me over the car and shit happened. But that’s a different discussion.

 

We have in the school environment, one of the younger siblings of a member was made aware. I think he’s like 13 or something. He was made aware that there was going to be a tranny at school the next year.

 

So the teachers sat all the kids down, said:

 

“When Jeffrey comes back next year, he’s actually not Jeffrey. He’s like, Janice and it’s a girl now, and you have to refer to him as a girl.”

 

And although all the boys in the class apparently just had a huddle and were like:

 

“Let’s just bully the fuck out of this faggot!”

 

And then they just went, as soon as Jeffrey came back, and he was like, all the teacher and the girls were like, trying to call him Janice and all this, and all the boys were like:

 

“Shut the fuck up, Jeffrey! You faggot!”

 

And the whole class did it, and they couldn’t expel everyone. So the kid eventually just dropped out of the school. So the Zoomers are winning. Actually, I think these are, these might be Gen Alpha. These might not even be Zoomers. I think we’re seeing, …

 

Blair Cottrell: The exact same thing happened, … When you were telling that story, the same thing happened in Port Phillip Prison when I was there. And it was a little jewish woman who was part of the prison staff, who brought into our unit a young Indian kid. I think he was about 18, 19 years old, but he was doing minimum ten year sentence because he killed his White girlfriend. I don’t know what the circumstances were. But in prison, when you kill a young girl, the other prisoners don’t really appreciate that. And it tends to be the sort of crime that if you’re convicted of it, you spend your time in the “slot”, we call it, or solitary confinement. You don’t really mix with the mainstream of the prison, for your own safety.

 

But yeah, one of the little jewish woman she was called the Youth Development Officer. Uh, she was all right to me, but she came up with this idea:

 

“We’re going to integrate this person into the mainstream unit.”

 

We had a meeting headed up by this woman who said:

 

“Look, there’s a guy coming into this unit who’s you know, he’s convicted of murder, he’s made a mistake and all that, but we’re trying to integrate him into mainstream to give him a chance.”

 

And the same thing happened, like, as soon as she left the room, we all just looked at each other, because we heard the details of what he’d done, and we’re just like:

 

“Let’s just fucking get this cunt!”

 

So [chuckling] he was only in there for an hour, but before he had to be taken out. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, Well, based!

 

Thomas Sewell: You cannot stop the Aryan spirit, and it lives in the youth, so good luck to them.

 

[38:51]

 

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I mean, getting suspended from school isn’t even that bad. I mean, you just get to sit at home for three days. Yeah, it’s one of the best punishments. Well, when I got suspended, my dad would, like, pack up the Xbox and take it with him to work, so I couldn’t play it. Fucking asshole!

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, my dad used to hide it. But he thought I didn’t know where he hid it, but I knew. So when he wasn’t home, I’d go and get it and then put it back.

 

Joel Davis: That’s what I did first. And then he figured that out. So then he just took it to work.

 

So then I was just fucked!

 

Thomas Sewell: My dad would take the power cable and I just wouldn’t tell him that I just stole a backup one from school. It’s the same power cable. They’re universal. [chuckling] So he took the power cable to work.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. The toaster cord. Yeah, yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. But I’ll talk about this story. Actually, let’s get a bit of a story going.

 

So I don’t know if you guys saw this, but it’s going around:

 

“Sweden to pay immigrants up to $34,000 US to leave. Sweden plans to boost payments up to $34,000 to immigrants who leave the nation that has been a haven for the war weary and persecuted, the Right-wing government, said on Thursday.”

 

So called “Right-wing”, I’m reading. This is from Associated Press.

 

Thomas Sewell: Can you put the article up?

 

Joel Davis: :

 

“The Scandinavian country was for decades seen as a, quote, ‘humanitarian superpower’, but over the years has struggled to integrate many of its newcomers. Immigrants who voluntarily returned to their countries of origin from 2026 would be eligible to receive up to 350,000 Swedish krona, …”

 

Which is $34,000. So what is that? Almost like 50 grand Australian?:

 

“The government, which is propped up by the anti-immigration Sweden, Democrats, told a press conference, quote, ‘We are in the midst of a paradigm shift in our migration policy’, migration minister Johann Forsal told reporters as the government presented its latest move to crack down on migration. Currently, immigrants can receive up to 10,000 krona per adult and 5,000 per child, with a cap of 40,000.”

 

So that’s a pretty massive increase.

 

Anyway. So this is making a lot of news because I think this is like the biggest payment of any European country or any Western country or I think any country in the world for people to re-migrate back to their countries of origin. And it’s obviously quite significant. There was some polling that was done that suggested that a very substantial portion of a lot of these immigrants, if they were paid enough to be able to resettle back in their homeland, would be interested in going home. So hopefully it gets rid of some of the shitskins out of Sweden.

 

But my response to this is that ultimately this isn’t the way. It’s not going to produce a very large scale of responses. Only a very small minority, I think, of these migrants will take the bait and go home. What’s stopping them coming back again later? I don’t know if there really is any mechanism to stop them coming back later, even after taking the money. Maybe their Visa gets ripped up or whatever, but they could reapply.

 

But also, moreover, it’s still playing into the idea that these immigrants are entitled to, basically the free choice of what country they want to live in and support to live a good life on the back of the Swedish taxpayer and so on. It isn’t creating disincentives or negative incentives. It isn’t saying we’re going to put a big levy or tax upon immigrants in order to basically make it difficult for them to make a substantial living in Sweden and therefore create the incentive for them to leave. It isn’t forcibly removing people.

 

And I think until you cross that boundary where you say:

 

“I’ll be willing to make the lives of immigrants substantially worse and actually ruin their choices, not expand their choices and try and give them a golden handshake, but actually make their life worse to stay.”

 

You’re not really going to get a substantial shift.

 

Additionally, that’s a lot of money. How the hell are these immigrants entitled to more from, … It’s still, I think, morally wrong almost to take even more from the Swedish people and give it to these browns.

 

But nevertheless, it probably, probably will reduce the overall numbers to a degree. So it’ll be interesting to see as an experiment how successful the programme is and keep an eye on it. It is part of like a changing attitude, I think, in European politics to the idea of the immigrants going back, which is a positive thing.

 

Blair Cottrell: Could it be a throw off just to placate the public who see what’s happening? Like:

 

“Oh, yeah, we just re-migrated a hundred people!”

 

But then another thousand came in.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course. Of course!

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s a step in the right direction. And I know that sounds like a really reformist take, not a revolutionary one. But it, as you said, it’s a new dynamic. It’s a new dynamic. We haven’t really had this dynamic. This hasn’t been a conversation on the table. Now that it’s a conversation on the table, it’s a clever little ploy from the conservatives. It’s like:

 

“Well see some of them went back, see, it is possible.”

 

And then you can just keep ramping it up.

 

And I shared, when the riots were happening in London, I shared an Enoch Powell interview. It’s maybe only like five or seven minutes long. And he’s with a very hostile kind of libtard journalist. And Enoch Powell is talking about these kinds of things, that there’s different measures that the British government could take to turn Britain back to being 100% White or 99.9% White.

 

And obviously he’s talking about a very small community of non-Whites. I think he’s talking about 100,000 or 200,000 that he sees need to go back.

 

Now, obviously, it’s in the millions. Potentially it’s like 10 million. But he does mention that. He says that there’s sort of this carrot and stick dynamic.

 

And then the libtard journalist says:

 

“Well, what happens if they don’t take the carrot?”

 

Basically, what happens if they don’t take these, … The journalist refers to them as “coercive measures” and defines this as coercion because you’re saying:

 

“Here, do this is the easy way because otherwise there’ll be a hard way. It’s like it’s subtly implied that you’re going to bring harm to migrants.”

 

And Powell’s playing the game. He’s not going full Hitler mode because that’s not what he was, but he’s not cucking on the question. He’s kind of trying to hold this, …

 

[45:19]

 

Joel Davis: Like, well, I mean, Hitler did play this game. Hitler did make a deal with the Zionists to relocate the jews to Palestine in exchange for, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, yes, technically, yes.

 

Joel Davis: So Hitler invented re-migration in a certain way, you could say.

 

Blair Cottrell: You’re saying that Adolf Hitler explored peaceful solutions to avoid war?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, of course!

 

Actually, at that time in the mid 1930s, because a lot of people say:

 

“Oh, Hitler actually supported zionism!”

 

And like this retarded mental gymnastics. At the time, in the mid 1930s, the International Jewish community was whipping up an intense amount of hatred against Germany at a time when Germany wasn’t as prepared for war as it was at the beginning of the Second World War. This is in the mid 1930s. Hitler only been in power for a couple of years. And the international clique of jews, particularly in New York, but everywhere, were whipping up a lot of anti-German sentiment. And the Poles were very emboldened by this to pursue a kind of aggressive posture against Germany, over the disputed territories and so on. You know, obviously, at the end of the First World War, a lot of former German territories were either handed over to Poland or the free city of Danzig was created as a kind of compromise as well.

 

But anyway, there’s a lot of details. I don’t even want to go down explicating them all. If you don’t know about this, read up on your history.

 

But the point is that Germans were in a relatively weak point at that point. Then the jews basically started fighting amongst themselves. All these different factions of people trying to get together and put sanctions on Germany and put pressure on Germany and make Germany a pariah state in the international community and so on. They kind of got consumed with the “two jews, three opinions”, internal warfare within themselves or internal arguments within themselves.

 

And the only faction within, the most unstable faction within that was the Zionists, who thought that they could exploit how anti-semitic the National Socialist regime was to get a big jewish population to go and participate in their settlement programme in Palestine, because obviously, this is before the state of Israel existed.

 

And at that time, zionism was just a dream of a certain subset of the jewish community in Europe. And they were trying to convince the jews to move there, most of whom had no interest, frankly, in moving to Palestine, because they were living in Europe and doing quite well in Europe and didn’t see the necessity, or didn’t really have the inclination to go and become part of a settler project, which, when you’re the first mover on those kinds of things, it isn’t always particularly in a maybe hostile place filled with Arabs, it isn’t necessarily the most alluring proposition.

 

So they saw what was happening in Germany as an opportunity, so they tried to seize it. And Hitler saw it as an opportunity to get one faction of the jews to maybe turn on the other factions, because then all the other factions would get pissed off at the Zionists for making a deal with Hitler, whilst at the same time getting rid of some jews out of Germany, which obviously was an objective.

 

So Hitler made it, you could say, a deal with the devil, which he thought was good strategy at the time. And it was actually a strategic masterstroke. Hitler was willing to, he was a strategic politician, like any good politician, looking out for the interests of their nation. I mean, he was willing to ultimately make an alliance with Stalin, not really an alliance, it was a non-Aggression pact, but he was willing to do deals ultimately in order to pursue Germany’s interests. And people say:

 

“Oh, this means that the National Socialists actually supported the Soviet Union, supported the jews!”

 

Which is the most ridiculous thing that you could possibly say! These are their mortal enemies. But it was just response to a particular strategic landscape that these things happened.

 

But getting back to re-migration. Unless you guys want to go off on that digression further, you’re welcome to interrupt and do so.

 

On the re-migration issue. I think the most beneficial thing about what the Swedish government is doing with this is that it won’t work. $34,000 US, it’s a substantial amount of money. But ultimately, going back to fucking Shitgannistan, wherever the fuck these people are from, Syria or whatever, you know, it sucks! Going back with 34 grand in your pocket. It’s still shit! And you’d much rather live in Sweden.

 

So I don’t think almost anyone is going to take this deal. And we’ll see that it won’t work. And that ultimately, if you don’t have sticks as well as carrots, you’re not getting these fucking browns out of Europe!

 

And I think we’ll learn that lesson hopefully quite quickly, as a result of the failure of this policy.

 

[50:09]

 

Blair Cottrell: You’ll get revolving door, too. What happens when they take the money, go home and run out of money? They’ll come back. And say:

 

“Oh, it didn’t work out. I’ll try again. Where’s the money?”

 

You know you can say:

 

“Oh, well, we’re going to create checks and balances so they can’t apply twice.”

 

But they’ll just come back with a different name. How are you going to tell them apart? They all look the same. [chuckling] Like it’ll be exploited. I think you’re right. It’s not going to work. There’s too many exploits.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. All of this is part of the subconscious rising of racial nationalism. I mean, slightly off topic, but in line with this concept of all these subtle ways of dealing with the problem, White people are just experts of subtle ways of dealing with the problem.

 

Let’s not be overt. Let’s just be constantly subtle. And the father, that cuck in Springfield, Ohio, whose son was killed by a Haitian migrant, and then he got up and did a speech. This is like last week, Blair, or this earlier in the week. And he said that:

 

“He wished that it was a Whiteman that killed his son.”

 

Joel Davis: Want to play it?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, sure.

 

Joel Davis: All right, give me, … You can keep going because it would take me about, …

 

Thomas Sewell: And then there was a community meeting where all these people got up and were complaining about these Haitian migrants.

 

And then there was like a black Governor, or a black town Mayor, and she was like:

 

“This meeting is over. It’s done!”

 

And there was people in the crowd that were like:

 

“But what are we going to do? How are we going to educate all these kids, they don’t speak English!”

 

And they were kind of shouting at the Mayor all these kind of sidetrack issues, not actually addressing the main issue. But it was, there’s like these traitors and there’s these lukewarm, and then there’s the fighters, as Hitler says. And the traitors are like:

 

“I wish a Whiteman killed my son.”

 

Because then there wouldn’t be more racism towards, you know, this enemy.

 

And then the lukewarms are like, they want what’s good. They’re neutral. I think neutral is a really good way of describing the normie, because they just want to live in a functioning society. They’re not bad people, but they want, I think, the same thing that the fighters want. We both want the same thing, but the fighters will come out and say it. The fighters will say:

 

“We’re going to get rid of these Haitians! Just get rid of them! Clear them out!”

 

But the neutrals will say:

 

“Oh, how are we going to? How is the school system going to work? We need to hire more teachers. Who’s going to pay for that? Because none of these Haitians speak English.”

 

And so they’re looking for some kind of gotcha moment. They’re always looking for a gotcha to try to get what they want. The problem is they’re dealing with an enemy. They’re dealing with a traitor. And the traitors like:

 

“Oh, we’ll work that out. We’ll figure that out.”

 

And it’s like:

 

“Damn it! Back to the drawing board. What’s the next complaint? To try to get what we want.”

 

But it’s like, you don’t get what you want by complaining and saying, how is this going to work? Or, like:

 

“How are we going to send the Syrians from Sweden back to Syria? Do we pay them 34,000? What if they come back?”

 

There’s all these kind of arse about face, roundabout ways of trying to resolve the problem.

 

But obviously, ultimately, it’s the stick. You just got to put the fighters in charge, and the fighters, like:

 

“You’re all going home! See you later. Hope you enjoyed your holiday. Bye bye!”

 

You know, no policy, …

 

Joel Davis: Idi Amin, … Sorry.

 

Thomas Sewell: No, that’s all right.

 

Joel Davis: I was just saying, when Idi Amin came to power in Uganda, he just said to the pajeets, because there was heaps of pajeets living in Uganda at the time, you know, part of the British Empire. There was a lot of pajeet migrants through the British colonies all across Africa. You know, Gandhi was actually from South Africa, for example.

 

Anyway, he came to power and he basically told the pajeets:

 

“They got 72 hours to get the fuck out or we’re going to start shooting!”

 

And the pajeets got out!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: You know, now that’s a pretty vulgar, you know, Idi Amin is like some butcher African dictator, but that’s probably the most effective re-migration policy I’ve ever heard of anyway, here’s the video of, …

 

Blair Cottrell: What did Heinrich Himmler say about this subject? He said:

 

“Humanitarianism is the expression of cowardice and weakness.”

 

So all these humanitarian alternatives to dealing with whether it’s, you know, immigrants, re-migration. Well, you know what I’m trying to say. They don’t make you better. I think that’s a problem. A lot of these people have, government officials, people that work in the media industrial complex. What the kind of thing, like, they think that humanitarianism makes them smarter, better people. It doesn’t. It makes you an idiot! It makes you a coward and an idiot! Straight up!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, exactly!

 

Joel Davis: I’ll play, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Like this guy right here. Like, this guy’s the perfect example of what I’m fucking talking about! Here’s some classic humanitarian cowardice and stupidity from the father of this poor kid that was. I don’t even know how the kid was killed. What’s the story behind this, Joel?

 

[54:56]

 

 

Joel Davis: By the way, talking about physiognomy like he looks like a mutt. He’s quite short. So what happened to this kid, by the way?

 

Thomas Sewell: [words unclear] Down Syndrome.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Yeah, he does.

 

So what happened to this kid? For context, for those who don’t know, there was a Haitian who was driving recklessly, he didn’t have a licence and basically caused a bus to swerve and crash. And an eleven year old boy on the bus that tragically died as he was basically thrown out the window of the bus as it crashed, in some way. And this is his father addressing the media.

 

Father: You know, I wish that my son, Aiden Clark, was killed by a 60 year old Whiteman. I bet you never thought anyone would ever say something so blunt. But if that guy killed my eleven year old son, the incessant group of hate spewing people would leave us alone. The last thing that we need is to have the worst day of our lives violently and constantly shoved in our faces. But even that’s not good enough for them. They take it one step further. They make it seem as though our wonderful Aiden appreciates your hate. That we should follow their hate. And look what you’ve done to us. We have to get up here and beg them to stop. Using Aiden as a political tool is, to say the least, reprehensible for any political purpose.

And speaking of morally bankrupt politicians, Bernie Moreno, Chip Roy, JD Vance, and Donald Trump, they have spoken my son’s name and used his death for political gain. This needs to stop now! They can vomit all the hate they want about illegal immigrants, the border crisis, and even untrue claims about fluffy pets being ravaged and eaten by community members.

However, they are not allowed, nor have they ever been allowed, to mention Aiden Clark from Springfield, Ohio. I will listen to them one more time to hear their apologies. To clear the air my son, Aiden Clark, was not murdered. He was accidentally killed by an immigrant from Haiti. This tragedy is felt all over this community, the state, and even the nation. But don’t spend this towards hate. In order to live Hayden, you need to accept everyone. Choose to shine, make the difference, lead the way, and be the inspiration! What many people in this community and state and nation are doing is the opposite of what you should be doing. Sure, we have our problems here in Springfield and in the US, but, …

 

Blair Cottrell: How was that guy’s, how he says:

 

“Donald Trump and other politicians have used the death of my son for politics.”

 

Really? Wow! Politicians use tragic circumstance for politics. That’s not going to stop, mate! When he says, this needs to stop that’s just been an eternal reality, core component of politics, and it always will be. That’s what politics is.

 

Joel Davis: He talked about a thing that happened.

 

Blair Cottrell: And the fact remains, like, he’s just trying to do what I think he’s Hoodwinked into believing is right. I mean, the guy wrote that, proofread it, and still thought it was a good idea to read that on camera.

 

Joel Davis: Like, just casually, …

 

Thomas Sewell: His wife proofread it. You can tell.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, probably.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: But the fact remains, I hope the guy hears this. I hope the guy hears this. The fact remains, mate, that if that Haitian immigrant was never in the country in the first place, your son would still be alive! It wasn’t the 60 year old Whiteman who killed your son. It was the immigrant. Your son is dead because of that immigrant! Yeah, that’s just a fact.

 

Joel Davis: I just wish that the immigrant had hit him. I wish he died. Hopefully one hits him soon. Hopefully one of these Haitian migrants eats him! I know that they prefer cats and ducks, apparently. Just I saw there’s a bit of controversy about abounding now in the American media because they’ve “fact checked”. Because in the Trump Harris debate, Trump pulled out the line of:

 

“The Haitian migrants, they’re eating the cats, they’re eating the dogs!”

 

And they were like:

 

“They fact checked it. No, technically, there’s no evidence of Haitians eating cats.”

 

But I’m seeing all these videos of Haitians, like, breaking cats necks and sucking their intestines out on my Twitter feed. So I don’t know what’s going on there exactly. But what I do know is that they put 20,000 [word unclear] down, and I saw a video of this guy saying that basically the government has come in and is paying way over the odds for the Haitian migrants to take up all the rentals in the town.

 

So everyone got kicked, all their leases got cancelled, and basically everyone were kicked out, because now every landlord can charge the state way over the odds to put a Haitian migrant in their house, and the rent is paid for by the State.

 

And so now there’s mass homelessness in this city. All these White people basically got thrown out of their homes so they could put Haitians in. These Haitians don’t have jobs, so they’re just loitering around on the street. They’ve come from a, you know, Haiti isn’t just war torn, Haiti is a totally, like, failed society where they’re eating mud! They’re eating, like, mud sandwiches, like, for breakfast in Haiti.

 

[1:01:15]

 

Blair Cottrell: And what’s native to Haiti? Are they, …

 

Joel Davis: They’re a bunch of niggas. They’re a bunch of, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Black people. Okay.

 

Joel Davis: They’re niggas. Like, they’re literal, like, slaves. So Haiti’s origin story is, …

 

Blair Cottrell: When you say black people, it’s like, there’s different thresholds of black people. What kind of black people in Haiti?

 

Joel Davis: They are the full niggas.

 

Blair Cottrell: Like, really black, midnight heart of darkness from Africa type thing? Or the ones that can actually run, …

 

Joel Davis: Like, how much milk is in the chocolate? Because they would have raped a lot of Amerindian woman. And all the local, whatever the local DNA was of the kind of Amerindians, they’re probably being kind of garbled up into, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Like, black Brazilians. You know, you see, like, a Brazilian that’s black, and they’ve kind of got a weird kind of Mexican black look to them.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s what the average Haitian looks like. They’re kind of Mexican black. They’re not for Hispanic, but they’re mostly black.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, they’re pretty nigger. Like, they’re niggas.

 

Anyway, the point is, Haiti was built off the slaves revolting against the French. And to the eternal shame of the British Empire, we helped them in our animosity to the French. They overthrew and mass raped and mass murdered. And ate literally, like, consumed the flesh of all the French that could get their hands on.

 

Thomas Sewell: 1830s, was it 1840s?

 

Joel Davis: Correct.

 

And basically, Haiti has been an anarchic cesspool of totally degenerated you know, nigger-retardation ever since. It’s like there’s African countries that are totally failed states where they’ve got child soldiers and weird voodoo magic and cannibalism and so on. Haiti has basically got that going on. Like, it’s a total shitscape. So bringing Haitian in, …

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s, like, worse than India. It’s actually a country worse than India. India is disgusting! But Haiti is India on steroids. Like, the trash is piling up in the streets. No one takes the trash out. So imagine years of rubbish everywhere. They’ve chopped down every tree. It’s an open sewer. It’s an open sewer!

 

And as Joel articulated, it was built. Yeah, we’ve got a problem. Yeah, it was.

 

Blair Cottrell: Remember the children are walking barefoot and pot bellied! We got a problem! Remember that testimony?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Black people. Not one seafaring ship. Not one! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: And they never built one boat that was seaworthy. Not one! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, Haitians are disgusting!

 

And again, they have the legacy of White genocide. Haiti as a country, I mean, it was a French colony, as Joel articulated, probably ten or 20% French. And then a whole bunch of African slaves were there picking the cotton fields, or it was probably sugarcane or fruit, something like that. And, yeah, there was a planned revolt, and they overthrew the French overlords and they killed them all. And they killed all the mulattoes that were in any sort of administrative or middle tier, middle rank, kind of like the Second Class, if the first class was the full blooded Whites, and the kind of Amerindian or African mulattoes with White blood in them were the kind of Second Class that helped, like the house niggers. And then the third class were the field niggers.

 

And basically the field niggers revolted and killed all the Whites, ate them and raped them, and then they killed all the mulattoes. Because they had too much White in them and they didn’t trust them. So they killed all the people that knew how to manage a farm, how to do anything [chuckling] other than just the most basic manual labour and be told what to do.

 

So then they all starved to death. Basically, like, 80% of the population died. And then what’s left are kind of the cannibals that managed to survive that genetic selective process. So they’re just, the worst scum, …

 

Joel Davis: That’s why foreign aid is disgusting, because they send all these UN aid packages to breed the Haitians back up to a large level.

 

Thomas Sewell: And then they dump them on America like a bio, …

 

Joel Davis: Like just degenerate into savagery and their population numbers will just collapse and barely any of them will be alive, which is good because they’re an abomination. But no, we’ve got to go and send in UN aid packages and raise money for Haiti. And then now we’ve got millions and millions of Haitians, and then all these do good libtards and shit now start importing them into the United States.

 

And actually Kamala Harris herself, like, personally presided over a programme to resettle Haitians in the United States en masse, which is why it has been made into a political campaign issue in the US presidential election over the past week, because they’re able to kind of pin this on her specifically.

 

And Trump was posting all these memes about how, like Kamala Harris is wants to kill all the cats in America and cats for Trump and shit! It’s kind of, it’s become this whole meme. And people have criticised it, saying:

 

“Why is he focusing on the eating cats thing.”

 

Rather than on the real issues of how, like, White people, like, you didn’t really say anything about how, like, average White people in Ohio, how their quality of life has been basically thrown off a cliff and their entire town has been ruined and thrown into chaos. So he’s not really kind of taking it seriously with his rhetoric, but just going for the meme. But the meme solicits the media reactions. So that’s like one argument for going for it.

 

But what’s interesting, I guess, about this is a few things, actually. One, they identified Catholic charities as being integral in the process of resettling them. And people say:

 

“Oh, but the Catholic charities are all run by jews!”

 

It’s like, yeah, there’s some jews involved, but, like, you have to acknowledge, libtard Catholics literally presided over this mass resettlement Program of Haitians.

 

[1:07:25]

 

Blair Cottrell: The Catholics had to sign off on it.

 

Joel Davis: There’s a whole bunch of libtards that are in the Catholic Church that operate within the Catholic Church’s framework.

 

Thomas Sewell: I bet the women have the same haircut. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. And so, you know, that’s interesting dynamic because, you know, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Long house haircut. Oh, God!

 

Blair Cottrell: You guys seen that theory? Apparently there’s this supernatural creature called the Mothman. They made a movie about it with, yeah, what was that guy’s name? It’s a real story. If there’s real sightings of this creature called Mothman that appears before a tragedy is going to happen and tries to warn you about it. And there’s stories about it having been seen a lot in Ohio right before a bridge in Ohio collapsed. I think it might have been in the nineties. But I was just saying [chuckling] that as a result of the immigrants from Haiti, maybe there’s a shitload of Mothman sightings right now. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: The Haitians probably ate the Mothman, bro!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, [chuckling] Mothman’s probably dead.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, man! He was just trying to warn us. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, the Haitians ate that nigger. It’s over! I don’t know. Maybe he’s not cute enough for them to eat. They seem to only eat cute things, like French people, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I took notes. Hold on. I took notes before when that cuck was talking, because it’s really important, like, dissecting that dad whose son died. He kept saying:

 

“It’s a political tool. It’s a political game.”

 

And what it came across is he is thinking politically. I don’t think the average person is thinking that politically, if the prime minister or the president talks about their son dying, they’re not thinking like:

 

“Oh, this fucking asshole! How dare he talk about my son dying!”

 

You know if someone’s son died, and then if you’re not a political person and the Albanese says that, like, mentions about the son dying, you’re not going to get upset about that you can be like:

 

“Oh, well the government recognises this tragedy, okay. Like, they’ve got their take on it.”

 

But you don’t think, like:

 

“They’re trying to win the argument. How dare you try to win the argument. You’re trying to win the argument!”

 

It’s very feminine the way he was talking came across, so he wasn’t concerned about the truth, which should be your main concern. Like, if your son died, someone’s responsible.

 

And then later on, he didn’t even say that the Haitian was responsible. He specifically said, although he is correct, it’s not murder, it’s manslaughter.

 

But he didn’t say that it was manslaughter. He said it was “accidentally killed”. So that the Haitian wasn’t responsible:

 

“It’s not the Haitians fault. You see. There should be no consequence, there should be no punishment, because it was an accident!”

 

And this is this just this long house. It’s this constant, overwhelming force coming from these faggot cucked men and women, and a lot of women as well. But I’m mostly focused on the men.

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s objectively not an accident as well. It’s culpable driving. That’s not an accident. It’s even legally recognised. It’s a crime.

 

Joel Davis: We did a vehicular homicide. And he said:

 

“Wouldn’t it be good if I wish it was a 60 year old Whiteman that killed my son?”

 

Yeah, he said that. Murdered. So White men does it. You want it to be a murder because you want to be able to talk about how evil White people are or something like it’s, …

 

Blair Cottrell: What a failure of a father. Like, dismal failure of a father is all that comes to mind.

 

Thomas Sewell: So they are always projecting. He’s saying:

 

“How dare JD Vance and Donald Trump use this as a political tool so that they can win their political game!”

 

But he is using it as a political tool! He’s trying to win a political game, and he’s projecting! They are only mentioning the truth, and he doesn’t want the truth mentioned because the truth gets in the way of him and his traitor ilk winning their political game! That’s my breakdown of it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. And I’ve seen this many times, particularly in England. But you see, I’ve seen it in America as well, where a young person, child, is murdered by some kind of illegal immigrant or other type of immigrant, and the parents are brought out to say:

 

“It’s nothing to do with race!”

 

Thomas Sewell: And I love Mexico.

 

Joel Davis: You don’t blame any particular community.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Stop the hate!

 

Joel Davis: If I was killed as a child by some shitskin, you know, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Tell me you would not come back as a ghost. You’d come back as a ghost.

 

Joel Davis: Like fucking niggers!

 

Blair Cottrell: You’d come back as a ghost.

 

Joel Davis: Okay. Like, at least my death was kind of cool. At least my parents are angry. Like, at least I was loved as a child.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Tell me you would not come back as a ghost and whisper into your father’s ear every night until he did something about it:

 

“Kill them all!”

 

[chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, yeah, speaking of, there’s another story, an opposite story that Joel shared today of the Swedish teenagers that tortured and killed that Afghani rapist. They all got off!

 

Joel Davis: Oh, yeah, yeah. So they actually, I think, were convicted originally, but they got off on appeal.

 

So basically the story TLDRx is that, so this Swedish girl was raped by some Arab piece of shit, and she must have sent him a message or something, saying:

 

“Oh, hey, like, let’s meet up.”

 

Or whatever, and lured him in so that all of her friends could basically fuck him up and kill him. Now, I don’t think, like, she obviously can be like:

 

“Oh, I didn’t know what they were going to do.”

 

So she obviously, I think, got away with that one. But they were all tried for murder, but they were acquitted on appeal because none of them talked. And their lawyers argued that:

 

“Well, all five of them couldn’t have done the murder at the same time. So that means you don’t actually know which one of them actually committed the murder.”

 

[1:13:40]

 

Blair Cottrell: Who cares? Just convict them all!

 

Thomas Sewell: No, we say don’t convict them all. No! Five White kids killed a black, Blair, you’ve misread.

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, sorry, I heard the wrong way around. Don’t convict them. Don’t convict them!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Black raped a White girl. And then the five White friends of the White girl lynched the black and torched him.

 

Blair Cottrell: And they got away with justices served. Why is there even any court case.

 

Thomas Sewell: And they got away with it. The reason why they got appealed is because nobody talks, everybody walks! That’s the fucking rule! No comment! [chuckling]

 

Blair Cottrell: Imagine that. Imagine White boys understanding how White courts work.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. Nobody talks, everybody walks!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Anyway, that’s just interesting story. Yeah, took some pleasure in it.

 

So, yeah, like hail to those kids.

 

Thomas Sewell: Swedish friends.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Good luck to them. Hope they enjoy their freedom. They deserved it, but, …

 

Thomas Sewell: They’re heroes.

 

Joel Davis: Teenage girls that get raped by these fucking shitskins and then they end up killing themselves. I like that this Swedish girl, instead of killing herself, went and got her friends together and was like:

 

“Let’s kill this fucking motherfucker!”

 

That’s a nice response. Yeah, exactly!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Then it needs to happen more often because I can’t fathom. Every man is gonna get, and not every man, but some men are gonna get tested in life with something as serious as this. A family member, you know, their wife, their daughter, you know, is going to have a bad circumstance with multiculturalism and diversity. And when that happens, you should really consider is it worth living in the shame of not doing something about that? Now I’m not going to advocate for violence because that would be illegal. But are you going to live in shame for the rest of your life, or are you going to do something about it?

 

And if it never happens to you, then you’re kind of lucky in a way that you never get your mettle really tested.

 

But yeah, it’s good to know that there are people out there that are like:

 

“Fuck it! I’m going to die on this hill. This is unacceptable. I don’t care what the punishment is. I don’t care what the consequences are. This should not have happened. And we need justice!”

 

And the Swedish courts. I mean, there’s cases and for sure they did this with the motivation and with the knowledge that there are cases of Swedish girls that have been raped. They’ve gone to the police. The police have locked up or arrested the rapist and the courts have let the rapists go and then paid them out 3 million krona or whatever the fuck it is for undue processes or something like that.

 

I mean, there was a there was an Afghani or Syrian that raped a Swedish girl recently and he was released and then he sued the Swedish government for some sort of like. There was some issue with the paperwork.

 

I can’t remember exactly what it was, but it was like he didn’t prove that he didn’t do the rape. He just proved that some undue process he had to go through like as part of his incarceration. And he got paid out like millions of krona, which I think is like hundreds of thousands of dollars, like 700 grand or something. And he got an early release as well. I think he only did three years and he was meant to do six or something. And it’s just fucking disgusting!

 

So if the justice system won’t do their job, it’s time for just global White civil disobedience and we should just get our own justice.

 

Joel Davis: I agree very much with Hersant’s view that we don’t give anywhere near enough love to the KKK anymore. [Thomas laughs] Ku Klux Klan. No, they seriously, they are true fucking heroes of the Aryan race. They kept America’s streets safe for White people for decades, not just through infiltrating the government and basically running the Democrat party for many, many generations. But also through some extra legal guarantees of peace and order in the streets. And they deserve a lot more respect and admiration.

 

At one point, think about this. At their peak, I think in the 1920s, like, one in ten American men were in the Ku Klux Klan. That’s how many klans from. They had like 5 million klansmen or something in the United States. And, well, America was a White supremacist country at that point. And black people did not fuck around. They were behaving themselves largely across the board, you know, trying to wear a suit and go to church and prove themselves to the Whiteman. And the Whiteman actually had a dignified existence in the United States at that point in history. And America was a great nation thanks to the Klan!

 

And since the Klan was dissolved basically after the Second World War, the whole place has gone to shit! So really, the Ku Klux Klan was really holding together, the whole of America when you look at it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Was that thanks to the Klan, or was the Klan kind of born of that circumstance? Maybe a bit of both.

 

[1:19:05]

 

 

Joel Davis: Well, I think the Klan deserves a lot of credit. I mean, because they had basically infiltrated the courts, the legal system, the state itself. They were incredibly well connected in addition to the extra legal activities, let’s say.

 

So it’s not just about you know, lynching some rapist negro, but it’s about the fact that they basically strike fear into the heart of those communities. Like:

 

“Well, you better not fuck around because the Klansman is going to fetch the rope!”

 

So when you create that credible fear. Like, we’re talking about Hitler’s re-migration policy, when the jews are like:

 

“Here’s your ability to move to Palestine, or you can stay in Germany with us. And here’s all the Goebbels anti-semitic propaganda getting Beamed at everyone.”

 

And the Nuremberg rally and stuff. It’s like:

 

“Where do you want to go jews?”

 

At the moment, there isn’t the fear to go along with the “here’s your way out”. Where when the Klan was around, there was, fear is the only language these savage races understand. It really is.

 

But, yeah, but organised White Mendez are the backbone of civilisation. Civilisation cannot stand without organised White men holding together justice in a society and order.

 

And so I think the Klan deserves a lot more credit than it gets. Because a lot of their activities were clandestine. That, like they can’t be celebrated as openly and ostensibly as the cause for what was looking back on it now, a golden era, really, in American history. That kind of White supremacist zenith that was the early part of the 20th century.

 

But I think you know, looking at it objectively, I think they have to take a very substantial amount of the credit for that. And they should be admired. I’m not saying everyone should get the White Hoods out and redo the whole Klan larp, but they should be admired nevertheless, a lot more in the culture for the role that they played. And that’s probably a controversial take. And people say:

 

“Oh, but then the Klan, there’s all these they were Freemasons and they went after this group, they went after Italians and blah, blah, blah!”

 

Yeah, whatever. Like I’m not, I don’t really want to get stuck in the minutiae of all of that. I was talking about the very basic, the very basic kind of fact of White men organised around, you know, rudimentary justice, racial justice and racial self defense.

 

And society is breaking down. The civil order is breaking down. This is going to be the only way that you’re going to be able to secure your communities going forward in the coming decades. Like, the state is not going to Reform itself and become better at executing law and order. Like the anarcho-tyranny is only going to get more and more retarded as time goes on.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. Think about Ohio as a textbook example where the government are nefarious. And a malicious government can send, 20,000 turbo niggers into your town of, I think it was either 38,000 or 58,000 Whites. And they sent like a quarter of the population, or a third of the population to just, … And they’re mostly, what? Young fighting age men. And they’re all speaking, you know, they’re all foreigners in a big country, so they’re going to stick together.

 

So even though they’re only a third of the population, that’s a powerful third, a very powerful third. Because most of the Ohio, it’s probably, they’ve got more fighting age men. I would guarantee that’s 20,000 Haitians would be more fighting age men than 60,000 Whites, because you’ve got women. And then think about all the old people that are in Ohio. Springfield, it’s like a small town. Like, mostly young people probably moved to the big cities for work.

 

So they’ve just built, they’ve just shipped an army of blacks into your town! And this is why White flight is not the solution. And having more children is not the solution.

 

I mean, these things are they can assist, you know, setting up defensible positions is important. Getting out of the poison and the poverty and, it’s just like the environment, culturally and physically, is polluted in the cities. So, yeah, it’s important to live somewhere that you can be healthy and raise children in a healthy way. And of course, healthy children is important. Having as many as you can.

 

But it still doesn’t solve the problem. Just more White people for the meat grinder. I mean, we can’t, we’re not going to out breed these population groups. We have to actually solve the problem before they become the demographic majority.

 

And that’s why it’s so important. As always, here’s a little segment for today’s show to get active, to build in real life community. Because I watched the town hall meetings. I watched two of them from Ohio, Springfield, and they were disgusting! It was like the, there was a couple men with some courage that stood up and they’re saying:

 

“Why is this happening? And this is not right and this is unfair.”

 

And then they basically get told:

 

“This meeting is over. This meeting is over!”

 

Like the DMV lady, like the black Mayor is like:

 

“This meeting is over. We’re not doing this!”

 

And then they’re standing there like:

 

“That’s illegal. You can’t do that you can’t shut down a meeting mid Question Time, or mid speaking time. This is against the Constitution or against the rules of Ohio. You know, the state legislator has to allow the time. The public has a right of reply, or a right of engagement in the political process, and you’re just undermining those rights.”

 

And the real question is, what the fuck are you going to do about it? You know, the system now is so nefarious and evil, it just makes the rules up as it goes along.

 

So what are you going to fucking do about it? You don’t get a right of reply. You don’t have Civil Liberties! You can’t sit there and say:

 

“I don’t want 20,000 Haitians in my town!”

 

They don’t give a fuck! They just steamroll you’re just an individual and individuals, …

 

Joel Davis: If you had 20,000 Klansmen in Ohio.

 

Thomas Sewell: Exactly! It was very different.

 

Joel Davis: Whose cats are getting eaten then? No one.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, [chuckling] 20,000 Klansmen. But that’s the point. You can’t run from this. You can’t hide from this. No matter where you are, no matter how isolated or how alienated you are, if you’re in the cities, you’re surrounded on all sides.

 

Like where I live right now, in the Eastern suburbs of Melbourne, there’s probably 70 or so houses on my street, I’ve only seen, other than myself, only two other White families. There’s three White families on my street. And I’m in a kind of a middle class or like well, there’s no such thing as middle class anymore, but I’m in a decent area in the Eastern suburbs of Melbourne.

 

Joel Davis: You’re surrounded by gooks, not Indians and niggas.

 

[1:25:45]

 

Thomas Sewell: There are Indians. No, no, there’s a lot of Indians. There’s three Indians in very close proximity, but it is mostly Chinese. But there’s also a lot of Indians. It’s probably, like 80% Chinese and probably 15% Indian.

 

But, you know what I mean? Like, there’s no running from there’s no hiding from this. We got to organise everywhere we go, whatever town you’re in. That town meeting would be very different if there was 100 or 200 men! Actual fucking men in the town! If there was just 100 or 200 men in that town of 58,000, and they went to that town meeting and they said:

 

“No, this meeting isn’t over!”

 

And they fucking, you know, who’s going to turn on those 200 men? The local police? No fucking way! They’d have to bring the feds in. They’d have to bring in some outside force to crush those 200 men! Because the local police would probably side. What if it’s in a small town environment, I don’t see any reason why these 200 men couldn’t be friends with the local police in a small town. That would be appropriate. It’s not like you’re dealing with the feds. You’re not breaking the rules there. You know, the Klan was very successful at controlling local police forces.

 

So, yeah, we need the Klan. We need to bring back the Klan. Jacob was right again.

 

But, yeah, just get active!

 

Joel Davis: Telegram, look up NSN contact bot or EAM contact bot, either one. And send a DM. And we’ll put you in touch through messaging the EAM or NSN contact bot with your most local representative.

 

So you can be better. You can join the organisation. Because yeah, no one else is going to build the Klan in this country except us. We’re the only ones building it. So you got to join us. You got no other choices.

 

Blair Cottrell: Be worth researching the how do you say Ku Klux or Klu Klux?

 

Joel Davis: Ku Klux Klan.

 

Blair Cottrell: Jacob still calls me Klansman, and I think he does it because I used to be against all the KKK stuff. But then I actually asked myself:

 

“What do I know about the KKK? Really? Nothing!”

 

So I can’t comment.

 

Joel Davis: He’s just like, klansman? Klansman! Like when he walks in the room, he shakes everyone’s hand and just says, Klansman! It’s actually White [word unclear]

 

Thomas Sewell: But he is correct. We are of the White clan. You know, we are. You know, the Klans were powerful. When I had that conversation with the Scottish descent Aussie farmer, he was talking about how all the farms. He lived one suburb over from Pakenham. What is it, Nar Nar Goon? And he was founding stock. His great grandfather bought that farm off the British Crown prior to Federation. And everyone had between 60 to 100 hundred acres. And they were all Scottish families. And he was telling me about how when he grew up, everyone, he had the smallest family because he only had five kids and everyone bullied him for it. And everyone else, he was like:

 

“The McMillan’s, they had 15 and these guys, they had twelve, and these guys had 13.”

 

And he said:

 

“If there was a problem in the town and you did something to one of these girls or you know, you did some bad business dealing with one of these families, you would have a hundred guys at your door!”

 

And he’s talking to me about this regarding Covid. I didn’t bring up Covid, but he was talking about the protests in the city. He was talking about what the government was doing to people. And he said:

 

“That’s the problem with today.”

 

This guy was 73 years old, same age as my father. He said:

 

“That’s the problem with the people today is we got things done in the past. The government couldn’t do this stuff to us in the past.”

 

And then he used these words. He said:

 

“Because we were a clan!”

 

He used those words. He said:

 

“We were a clan! There were six families here, and everyone had around ten kids each on average. So we were a clan. We were like a greater family. And the clan inside the clan, they were all community because the daughter from one of the McMillan’s married the Forbes’s and da da da da da.”

 

So there’s blood, loyalty, there’s loyalty. There’s blood and honour. There’s natural foundational loyalty because that’s your brother in law. You’ve got like hundreds of like, second relations. You have a duty! You’ve got fucking a dog in the fight. You got skin in the game. Literally got skin in the game! If something happens to one of these people, if the government fucks with one of those people like, I think about that pregnant lady that was helping organise the Covid rallies, or she shared a Covid rally post on Facebook, and then like, 20 counter-terrorism rocked up to her house and she’s like, pregnant.

 

I remember seeing that video. And it just makes you, … It makes you burn inside when you see it. You’re like, if we were a real community, if we were a real clan, as White people, that wouldn’t be tolerated! Those cops would never be able to live it down. Those cops would never, ever get a handshake ever again! They would be spat on in the streets, everywhere they went! That they would be. They would have to leave the police force, they would have to run away, they’d have to change their name and go to another country. If we were a real country, if we were a real clan.

 

I’m not fed posing, I’m just saying, just the social pressure, just the ostracisation, businesses would say:

 

“You’re not welcome here. Get the fuck out! You did that to my sister in law!”

 

Or my cousin’s sister in law, or whatever the hell relation it is if we were actually tight knit! If we’re actual community, you know, that’s power! That’s real power. That’s grassroots power. A couple hundred, …

 

Blair Cottrell: This is why it’s in the interests, the system, to encourage hyper individualisation, right?

 

So everyone sees themselves as separate from each other. Everyone’s got their own mortgage, their own Netflix subscription. Everyone sits by themselves and doesn’t look at each other. And that’s the kind of culture we have to break.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yes. And just the obsession with social media. I think ultimately it’s a good thing. The more regulation they put, I don’t think this problem is going to be solved with social media. I think it’s good that we can organise using it and we can spread our ideas more rapidly than we ever have before.

 

But all the action is coming from in real life. All the action is coming from grassroots, from community building, from activism, from training together, from building culture from scratch, whatever that culture may be, whatever temple or institution that we’re building from scratch, whether it be a school, or a gym, you know, whether it be for fertility or martial, whatever it is. We’re rebuilding the pantheons. And I think that’s important.

 

Joel Davis: I think the concern with the yeah, I don’t really have a problem with you know, banning children off social media. I think there’s more harm than good that comes from them participating in that kind of thing I’m sure they’ll find ways around it, frankly. I don’t know exactly how feasible it will be. It just seems like a pretext to bring in-laws to mandate using, basically identifying yourself when you create social media accounts and log into social media accounts as a way to, basically give the government records of exactly whose Twitter account is whose and so on. Which seems to be kind of a step, therefore beyond that, to be able to bring in hate speech legislation and start actually door knocking people for racist tweets and so on like they do in Britain.

 

[1:33:06]

 

 

So that is a bit of a concern. It’s more like the kind of, oh, this is a pretext that you can get mums and dads behind, you know, everyday punters. Like:

 

“Yeah, you know what? Maybe we shouldn’t have twelve year olds on Instagram. Maybe that’s actually kind of fucking up the kids. We shouldn’t have, you know, twelve year olds scrolling TikTok for 3 hours a day watching skippity toilet videos and shit!”

 

I can understand that.

 

So then they’ll support it. And then all of a sudden you bring in they bring in a measure that can lead to like hate speech regulations. So, it’s one of those issues.

 

By the way, I think there’s actually going to be a rally against this, against the government censorship, the Misinformation Bill, which is a separate thing as well as related issues such as digital ID and so on, in Sydney this weekend. I think I have the details here somewhere. I’ll just pull them up. For those of you, I don’t live in Sydney anymore.

 

Thomas Sewell: Is there a Melbourne one?

 

Joel Davis: I haven’t seen anything in Melbourne as of yet. If anyone knows of anything, please send it to me.

 

But in Sydney I saw this is posted by John Ruddock, who is a member of New South Wales Parliament for the Libertarian Party. So it seemed like a kind of a big tent kind of thing. Speaker’s Corner in Sydney [https://soapboxspeakers.wordpress.com], which is on Art Gallery Road, The Domain, opposite New South Wales Art Gallery, if, you know, where that is in the city.

 

John Ruddock said here:

 

“Federal Labour has introduced the most insidious Bill since Federation, the Combating Misinformation and Disinformation Bill. They are erecting an East German style surveillance state. They want to treat us like farm animals. Join the resistance on Saturday the 28 September.”

 

So actually, no, it isn’t this weekend. I’m glad that I read this. It’s 11:30 in the morning, Saturday the 28 September. So that’s not tomorrow Saturday, but it’s actually Saturday, two weeks from tomorrow. So that gives you plenty of time to. We’ll talk about it some more. I really encourage nationalists to go down there, get your mates, go down there. Even just for the networking reason. It’d be good for there to be a good show of public opposition to force some discourse and embolden the Right-wing parties to put up some resistance to this, because it has to go through the Senate. And yeah, the Left do have the numbers, but in the Senate it gets a little bit complicated.

 

So it could be good to force some public debate and perhaps take a little bit of the edge off the Bill for some to negotiate it a little bit or something. But even if that isn’t possible, just go down there and go network. It’s a good opportunity to meet potentially sympathetic normies. I did like that John Roddick said “East German style”. As well, that’s nice. That’s obviously communist East Germany that he’s referring to. I like that he’s attacking. Libertarians are usually a bit better about this attacking than conservatives. They’ll attack it as a communist thing rather than as a “fascist” thing, which is better messaging.

 

But yeah, I have said before as well, I do think we should have some strategic friendship as much as possible between nationalist and libertarian factions in Australian politics, because a libertarian faction does care about putting up a defense of our free speech rights, which nationalists desperately need in order to advocate for our worldview. I don’t think libertarians really have much of a chance at becoming a real threat to us in becoming a very prominent political faction that could seize power, but they can nevertheless mobilise in defense of freedom of speech. And so I think we should be friendly on that grounds.

 

And often a lot of libertarians can be not so bad on quite a few issues. Like a lot of the libertarians that I speak to are usually more Right libertarians that are will agree that, yes, immigration has gone way too far and should be stopped and they’re importing Left-wing voters. Then they’ll stop short of being full race pilled. But nevertheless, politically speaking, they’re a lot better than pretty much all the other factions on a lot of the key issues.

 

So I think it’s worth having an open dialogue with them. Not making our points and our points of disagreement, but also seeing them as another kind of marginalised faction of the Right that perhaps we could kind of get along with. And because they aren’t as hot in terms of the controversy surrounding them, they’re more accepted, even though they aren’t part of the mainstream, they’re like accepted. They aren’t as controversial. So that gives them the ability to kind of operate effectively in ways that when you’re a full on nationalist, you meet a lot more opposition, from the state, from the Left, and so on.

 

Blair Cottrell: Are there any active libertarians like in the, what I suppose you could call the activist sphere? I don’t know of any.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I mean, I just mentioned this guy’s literally a Member of Parliament, John Roddick of the Libertarian. He’s the head of the Libertarian Party in New South Wales. The Libertarian Party seems like it’s reasonably serious faction. That’s the rebranding of the Liberal Democrats, by the way. People might remember the Liberal Democrats. So they obviously have associated people. There’s a lot of, I notice there’s a bunch of libertarians on Twitter. I got jumped into Twitter space with a few of them the other day and debated a few things with them. No, quite friendly, to be fair. And we had a good discussion. So they do seem to have a decent little faction online line, and they seem to be willing to engage in this freedom movement stuff, which is kind of a leftover from Covid. But moving on now to other issues, now that Covid is kind of behind us.

 

So they’re doing a street rally right here. A lot of these people were involved in the Vote No rallies [re the Abo Voice referendum] and that whole clique as well. So there seems to be a certain continuity in general with this general kind of populist, dissident element of kind of the activist kind of big tent. And the libertarian movement seems to make up a big bulk of that. So yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Cool. Do you want to wrap it up? Do the Superchats?

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, I think we’ll finish a little bit earlier tonight. I’ve got a big day tomorrow, so I need to get to bed soon. We’ve only had, as far as I can tell, two Superchats on Rumble.

 

So if you want to send one through, do it now, because Joel will be checking our other platforms for Superchats there, too. You’ll have a bit of time to get one through if that’s what you want to do to support the show.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I just also want to mention quickly, before we do the Superchat, this article, because it’s important to mention Jacob this week was in court, Jacob Hersant, we mentioned him a little bit earlier. This is The Noticer article:

 

“Australian facing year in jail for political salute vows to appeal if convicted in landmark free speech case.”

 

 

Basically Jacob has been the first person in Victoria charged with doing the banned Roman salute. And it was kind of like a semi-salute. For those who don’t know, he came out of court after a previous issue was finally resolved and he kind of almost threw a Roman, but then pulled his arm back and was like:

 

“Oh, can’t do that now. It’s illegal!”

 

To the media. And they charged him over it. So Jacob is arguing in court, or his lawyers arguing in court that it’s actually unconstitutional, that the Constitutional implied right to freedom of political communication, which has been established by high court precedent, would make this an unlawful or an unconstitutional law and therefore he shouldn’t be convicted of the crime.

 

But also there’s the softer argument that, well, he didn’t actually do the Roman salute, so it’ll be interesting to see how this case goes. It’s only in the Magistrate’s Court. So above that, there’s County Court, and then there’s like the Supreme Court of Victoria, and then potentially even the High Court. I don’t think it would go that far. I guess it’s possible.

 

Regardless of what happens, whether he wins or loses, getting appealed to a higher court, particularly if he loses, he’ll definitely appeal it.

 

[1:41:37]

 

Thomas Sewell: And if he wins, the government will appeal it. Because if he wins at Magistrates, which is very unlikely, the judge, the magistrate, is the Constitutional law magistrate. He’s a specific magistrate. I can’t remember the guy’s name, but he’s specifically selected for this case because he’s the expert on constitutional law at the magistrate’s level, which is really more focused on obviously Victorian legislation, because it’s not the Supreme or High Court. If he’s a cowboy, then there’s a chance that he can win. But I don’t know the guy, I don’t know what kind of magistrate this guy is.

 

But what the boys said that went and took notes was that the first day the prosecution called a whole bunch of witnesses, including a bunch of communists from Melbourne Uni, and they basically explained to the court a whole bunch of things that are incorrect about the history of the Roman salute. But they also explained that Jacob doing the Roman salute is against the Constitutional rights of minorities to have their political views, and that minorities have an implied right to freely express their opinions in Australia. And Jacob doing the salute is a violation because it intimidates every non-White in the vicinity, and basically that exists in Australia into not expressing their political rights.

 

So they did, like this weird projection where they’re not stopping Jacob’s political rights, they’re stopping Jacob from stopping other people’s political rights, because Jacob doing an arm gesture takes away from the implied right of non-Whites to have rights. It’s a full double-think tautology. Really interesting!

 

So that was the first day of evidence. And then the second day of evidence. So that was the Monday and then the Tuesday, the Victorian government, because it’s a constitutional matter, the Victorian government had to supply a team of lawyers to represent the Attorney General, or the Victorian version of the Attorney General. And they basically repeated, those lawyers repeated almost word for word, the same thing as the communist “think tank” from Melbourne Uni. They basically said the same thing. They said:

 

“Well, this law is constitutional, and we’re here to represent the Attorney General that put this law through.”

 

I’m pretty sure the Victorian Attorney General is a jew. Is that correct, Joel? He’s jewish?

 

Joel Davis: Victorian Attorney General? I know the Federal Attorney General* is jewish.

[* Mark Alfred Dreyfus is an Australian politician and lawyer who has been attorney-general of Australia and cabinet secretary since June 2022, having held both roles previously in 2013 and from 2010 to 2013 respectively. Dreyfus is a member of the Australian Labor Party, and has been the MP for Isaacs since the 2007 election. Dreyfus was born (1956) in Perth, Western Australia, the son of George Dreyfus, a noted composer who came to Australia from NS Germany. He is of jewish ancestry. Wikipedia]

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, Dreyfus is a jew. Yeah, Dreyfus was I think, the first politician or one of the first politicians to do the Senate inquiry into us, to try to ban us as a terror group back in 2020. So Dreyfus has been on the agenda the whole time [chuckling] trying to ban us, ban the salute, ban everything! Jaclyn Symes*. Yeah. Okay, well, anyway, representatives of Jaclyn Symes, the Victorian Attorney General, just repeated word for word that Jacob doing the salute, like, is why she. They didn’t say this word for word, but this is kind of what they implied that him doing it kind of creates this, like, “force wave” through society. Like it’s this magic superpower that floats through society again, player. They didn’t say this word for it, but this is what they’re implying. They’re implying his action of doing the salute is so powerful, so gracious, so incredible that it actually basically brain blocks all the non-Whites and jews in the vicinity, in an infinite vicinity within the boundaries of Australia, because it intimidates them. And now they can no longer express whatever it was they were going to express. They’re completely, …

 

[* Jaclyn Symes is an Australian politician and Attorney-General of the state of Victoria. She is a Labor member of the Victorian Legislative Council, having represented Northern Victoria Region since 2014. Symes worked for five years as a ministerial advisor for Rob Hulls, the Victorian Deputy Premier and Attorney-General. Wikipedia]

 

Blair Cottrell: I’d love to see how that was worded. Love to see how they worded that! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: It’s so insane! It’s like using your rights of political communication, intimidates others into not being able to communicate their political opinions. It doesn’t make any fucking sense!

 

Thomas Sewell: So what I said to Jacob was, I was like:

 

“This is fascinating! This if this law passes, like, if they actually get Jacob on this and they make this legislation, it’s still a political victory from us in the sense of accelerating. The government is just accelerating.”

 

Because we can articulate this to the public that. Hang on a minute. Whites are Second Class citizens. Non-Whites are allowed to express their political views. But if Whites express their political views, it violates the political views of non-Whites! So only non-Whites are allowed to express their explicit political views. Whites are only allowed to repeat the political views expressed by non-Whites. They don’t have any actual individual. Well, not individual. That’s the wrong word. But they don’t have any unique political views that are only for Whites. Those views are banned!

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: So we’re Second Class citizens in our own country!

 

Joel Davis: One thing that could. Could happen here is the judge could rule that, … Could kick the can down the road and rule that:

 

“Well, he didn’t actually complete the Roman salute. He just kind of made his arm halfway extend and then aborted it.”

 

And therefore, he doesn’t actually have to rule upon it as a constitutional matter because he can just simply rule, …

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s the worst case scenario.

 

Joel Davis: But then eventually, at some point, a court is going to have to rule on this because someone is going to do it.

 

Thomas Sewell: Someone is going to do it! [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. [chuckling]

 

But, yeah, I would anticipate. Honestly, I do think we have a very good chance of victory here. Maybe not in the Magistrates Court, but when it goes into the higher courts, because that argument is just so bad! Like, if that’s the best constitutional argument they have, they’ve got nothing! Absolutely!

 

Thomas Sewell: That’s the argument they have.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

[1:47:35]

 

Thomas Sewell: I asked Jacob for more information, and he was like:

 

“That’s the argument they have.”

 

They didn’t have another argument. It was that:

 

“Jacob doing it basically creates negative feelings and harm in non-Whites in the vicinity and violates their rights. So therefore the law should be constitutional because the law isn’t imposing on the rights of Australians, it’s actually assisting the rights of Australians, because it’s stopping people who are trying to stop Australians from expressing their rights!”

 

It’s fascinating, but that’s their argument.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, but anyway, I’ll get onto some of these Superchats because Blair’s tired and, uh. Yeah, we got.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m okay. I’m okay. Don’t mind me. I’m here.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, you’re all right.

 

Blair Cottrell: I’m sick of being the tired one. I’m sick of being the oldest, tiredest one! [chuckling]

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, just gonna get on the White energy. The White monster.

 

Joel Davis: I was gonna, I actually had one more video. Do I have permission?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Blair, I specifically want to get your reaction to this, and maybe you being kind of a little moody might actually make it funnier.

 

So I don’t know if you actually.

 

Blair Cottrell: All right, let’s do it! What have we got.

 

Joel Davis: You might have seen this already because it went pretty viral online. When I saw this, I thought it was fake, and then I realised that I don’t think it actually is fake. I think, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, no!

 

Blair Cottrell: Haven’t seen it yet. So let’s have a look.

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, no!

 

Joel Davis: I can’t believe that this is real.

 

Female in Muslim garb: To the stigmas of Australia, I say that this goofy air government have been capping not just now, but for a long time. A few of you may remember when they said there’ll be no phantom tax under the government I lead. They’re cappaholics!

They’re also yappaholics. They yap non-stop about how their cost of living measures are changing lives for all Australians. Just put the fries in the bag, Lil bro. They tell us that they’re not proving the housing situation in this country. They must have brain rot from watching too much kaisenet [sp] and forgot about their plans to ban social media for kids under 14. If that becomes law, you can forgore skull emoji, all about watching Duke Dennis or catching a dub with the bros on Fort. Chat, is this prime minister serious? Even though he’s the prime minister of Australia, sometimes it feels like he’s the CEO of Ohio. I would be taking an hour if I did not mention the ops who want to cut WA’s [word unclear] and services tax. The decision voters will be making in a few months time will be between a mid government, a dogwater opposition, or a crossbench that will mock both of them. Though some of you cannot yet vote, I hope when you do, it will be in a more goated Australia for a government with more aura, skivity.

 

Blair Cottrell: What did I just watch? What did you make me watch? What’s her strategy for appeals court, …

 

Joel Davis: Only 20 seconds. I couldn’t actually get through it.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, man. I don’t know. I’m trying to get over the initial cringe to understand her strategy there. What is it to, … Isn’t [word unclear] too young to vote anyway? Like, aren’t these Parliamentarians whores for votes? The people she’s trying to appeal to can’t even vote yet! [chuckling] I don’t understand. Obviously she’s just looking for clout. Who is this woman? Who’s this headscarf woman in Parliament anyway? Does anyone know? I’ve never seen her before in my life. Maybe that’s the point.

 

Thomas Sewell: I’ve seen her. I’m pretty sure she did a speech. She hit the algorithm a while ago because it wasn’t until the refugee crisis. Didn’t she get in trouble because she went to a meeting that was declared anti-semitic? Isn’t that same one? Fatima? Isn’t that her name? Fatima?

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, yeah! Yeah, that’s right. Wasn’t she the one who said, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Is she a Green Senator?

 

Blair Cottrell: She’s the Green Senator. She’s the Green Senator who said that:

 

“Regardless of what sort of initiative it is, jewish lobbyists try to get into it and take over it.”

 

She’s the one who said that, wasn’t she? Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I’m pretty sure that’s the one. Yeah.

 

Blair Cottrell: All right, well. Hmm. [chuckling] Maybe I don’t like hater that much. I don’t even know. I don’t know. It’s too late in the night for me to process.

 

Joel Davis: She was in the Greens. I don’t think she the person. You’re just describing someone else. She was in Labour, and she got booted from Labour recently because she refused to vote with them on some resolution about Israel-Palestine, obviously siding with the Palestinians against the government, which has a kind of moderate but more pro-Israel position, obviously, because, you know, who runs the country.

 

Thomas Sewell: She’s Labour.

 

Joel Davis: She’s no longer Labour. So now she’s basically Independent. She’s 28 years old.

 

Blair Cottrell: Not quite as bad as that haka? Remember that Maori woman? And doing the haka in New Zealand Parliament? What is it with women just making a mockery out of Parliament and of themselves in the process?

 

Thomas Sewell: The Greeks predicted that.

 

Joel Davis: Women just aren’t funny. That’s the problem. When they try to be funny. It’s, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, well, I’m not sure. Is it more embarrassing for Fatima, the woman who just delivered that nonsense, or Parliament itself? It’s kind of embarrassing for us. Is it humiliating?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Women in the Senate, …

 

[1:53:26]

 

Blair Cottrell: The more of a dancing monkey they can be inside Parliament or inside our institutions, the more they can make a mockery of those institutions and by extension, of us as a people, I think. Maybe that’s the strategy. Maybe that’s what’s going through her head. And the heads of all of these women in Parliament, that’s probably the best way to understand it, I suppose.

 

Thomas Sewell: She’s married to an Aussie as well.

 

Joel Davis: Obviously you can tell, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, you gotta do something to stand out to these days from the crowd. So she’s probably trying to do that a little bit, too.

 

Thomas Sewell: But all the brown anti-racist women are all looking to get bleached. They’re all hypocrites!

 

Blair Cottrell: Oh, yeah. Well, there’s only one way genetics can go. Like, when it comes to selecting a mate. It’s like, actions speak louder than words. It’s a very cliche, classic saying, but you can always, …

 

Joel Davis: Some, like, fat, super soy, like, libtard guy. Often they’re gingers.

 

Thomas Sewell: And I think he’s kind of half ginger. He’s like a [word unclear] ginger.

 

Joel Davis: Look, I’m not, … This is not ginger hate. People accuse me of ginger hate, because I noticed before, a lot of the White converts to Islam happen to be ginger. And people are like:

 

“I won’t stand for this ginger hate! You’re anti-White! Gingers are White!”

 

Or what I’m not saying gingers aren’t White. I support them. I’m just noticing a trend. They got, like, a certain kind of strangeness they can get pulled into, like, this weird relationship with the Islamic world.

 

And I think it’s because they’re Scythian heritage, and the Scythians once ran that whole region.

 

And so there’s this kind of ancestral, like, those are, like, their ancient enemies, which they have, like, ancient relationships with. And there’s some weird, like, unconscious thing going on. Not saying that there’s something fundamentally wrong with gingers. I’m not saying that. I like gingers. I’m pro-ginger. Some people have thought that I was ginger, incorrectly, because I’m not!

 

But I guess on, like, there’s been pictures of me taken that in a certain light, my hair looks a little bit gingery. And people have accused me of being a ginger online.

 

And I was like:

 

“Well, first of all, that’s not offensive. I’d be quite happy to be ginger if I was. But second, I’m not a ginger. But if I was, why is that bad?”

 

Thomas Sewell: The guys at work asked me, like, last week, they’re like:

 

“Tom, would you rather be a ginger or bald?”

 

Ginger! Instantly ginger! Give me my hair back! [Blair burst out laughing] I’ll be red headed, just give it back! But no, it doesn’t work like that, unfortunately. [chuckling] It’s like half of their personality is just from Family Guy, like, and I think Google’s always listening as well, because after they said that the first thing that came up in my algorithm when I went to put music into YouTube was a Family Guy clip. And it was like, Peter asking the black guy, the wheelchair guy, and the sex pest:

 

“Would you rather be Hitler in 1943, or homeless with a 5% chance of being a billionaire?”

 

Or something like that. [chuckling]

 

And then the wheelchair guy’s like:

 

“Am I still in a wheelchair?”

 

And the black goes:

 

“Am I still black? Am I black in a wheelchair?”

 

[chuckling]

 

And I was like:

 

“Man, this is funny!”

 

You’re almost strawberry blonde. Almost. Yeah, you’re like strawberry blonde.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. Well, the red gene is in my family, but the gingers have these special abilities that kind of make them slightly different. Like, sometimes slightly worse, sometimes slightly better. And in my, in the case of my family, I think they’re even better because my cousin plays for Carlton, and he’s one of the redheads in the family. Probably the only one currently, actually. No, there’s two. But the other one’s a woman, so she’s obviously not going to play football. But he plays a professional level, like AFL.

 

Yeah, there’s some qualities that are apparently exclusive to the redhead experience, the redhead human experience. And one of them that I found fascinating was different pain thresholds, sometimes experiencing more pain than other people would from small cuts and grazes. But major injuries don’t cause a great deal of pain.

 

And there’s also a resistance to certain types of drugs, particularly anesthetic. And this is well known by anesthesists or anesthesiologists, if you’re in America, the people who administer the concoction which sedates you and puts you into a deep sleep while you’re being operated on. It’s known by these people that if they get a redhead on the operating table, they all get a bit nervous because they don’t know how that person’s going to react to the anesthetic. A lot of them wake up during the surgery. Sometimes it just doesn’t work on them at all, and they have to pump them with twice as much to get a result. So it’s weird! I haven’t seen any explanation for why this is the case, but redheaded people have some special abilities.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, they’re definitely a unique people, and there’s definitely some ancient law to it. For example, a lot of the mummies of pharaohs in Egypt were redheads.

 

And interestingly, George Washington. I believe it’s George Washington, was a redhead. And they did a DNA testing on him about five years back, or seven years back. And it turns out he has a very rare haplogroup. So most of us are like, R1B or R1BA or something like that, R1A. And there’s a few that are less common for western European people. But he was like some weird haplogroup. He was like J or K haplogroup, which has been traced directly back to most of the pharaohs.

 

So that means he’s a direct, George Washington’s a redhead, and he was a direct descendant. Like direct, not indirect, like a lot of us are, I think Joel put up something today that, like, 80% of Irish people have some, and they’re mostly redheads or not mostly, but they’re the highest. Scots Irish had the highest percentage of redheads.

 

But, yeah, that’s an interesting fact. So it’s obviously an ancient race. There’s obviously an ancient race of redheads that conquered Mesopotamia.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. One of the myths as to why the Scots became known as the Scots, is that because they descended from the Egyptian princess Scotia.

 

And then that’s kind of interesting because you look at, like, Scottish Rite Freemasonry, and it’s got all these pyramids and shit in it! And you’re like, what’s with this, like, weird Egyptian connection? There’s some evidence that the prophet Muhammad, and maybe even Jesus Christ could have been gingers as well, based upon certain descriptions.

 

[2:00:30]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: The descriptions of Muhammad was that he was a redhead and he had a red beard. That’s why Muslims love redheads. That’s why they’re always trying to recruit gingers, because they want the ginger genes back. It’s just subconscious. They don’t even know why. And they’re not allowed to draw Muhammad, but they, but someone drew his brother and his daughter way, way, way back in the day, and his daughter was blonde and blue eyed. I don’t know, I can’t remember his brother’s hair colour. But they’ve got Muhammad’s beard. They’ve got hairs from his beard in some of the old mosques.

 

And it’s like, if you go to a serious mosque, if you’re a Muslim, they’ve still got, like, artifacts of Muhammad, even if it’s just one hair and it’s almost always red.

 

Blair Cottrell: We are conquerors! Always have been, huh?

 

Thomas Sewell: Even when our ideologies get diluted [chuckling] like Buddhism or, …

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. So Ginger’s a kino. Like, we should be pro-ginger on the show and in the movement, I think when Hitler painted a picture of Mary and Jesus, he gave Jesus ginger hair. Hitler was ginger pilled!

 

But anyway, there’s enough, you know, gingers, we’ve trolled you before, but we just gave you, like, a nice glazing. Ginger glazing, tonight on the show.

 

Let’s get into some Superchats, and I’ll go to the Entropy chats first. Deer in the Headlights just sent a full stop, so thanks. The Gump said:

 

“Honour to you for keeping the message pure and uncompromised. Hail victory!”

 

Well, thank you. And Based Teneri George said:

 

“Have you, Joel, read Carl Schmitt’s beautiful book Land and Sea? If you have, any thoughts on it, and on Schmitt and his thought more generally, can you name an American White advocate counterpart you especially admire, though he may not agree on everything, my great respect to you Aussie warriors for the race, Joel, Blair and Tom.”

 

Okay, well, you put a lot there.

 

First of all, I have not read Land and Sea, but I have read a lot of Carl Schmitt’s other books. I just reread The Concept of the Political with a reading group we had within the organisation, actually, this week, which is a brilliant book that I’ve read multiple times. Short, but Carl Schmitt’s thought is incredible! I don’t think there’s many political theorists on his level. He’s one of the absolutes! I think he’s the best political theorist of the 20th century. Incredibly prescient. He basically predicted the ideological implications of the post World War Two international order, what form it would take, before World War Two, anyone even knew that was going to happen. He could kind of see the direction that liberalism was going in. And, yeah, very, just incredibly accurate political analysis, I would say, in general, very cutting, like, theoretical analysis in general that basically everyone should be aware of obviously, Carl Schmitt ended up joining the NSDAP and advised it. And also refused de-Nazification after the war. And despite this, he was too big to cancel from Western academia because he was just simply too influential. And so his work remains ubiquitous in kind of Political Science postgraduate courses.

 

I would say about Schmitt that, yeah, like, I think he is an essential reading for people in the movement. A towering figure. So very, very long praise, but I haven’t read his Land and Sea. I am aware that his geopolitical thought, that he kind of largely played off, that obviously he had the idea of great spaces, and he largely played off, I think, the kind of Mackinder Theory* around, like, sea powers and land powers, obviously, in that text, and I think it is quite accurate, when you look at the history of the British Empire with respect to the history of the Germans or the Russians as a land power and a sea power, they have very different kind of political orders. If you’re a sea power, that means that you rule basically through international trade networks.

[* “The Geographical Pivot of History” is an article submitted by Halford John Mackinder in 1904 to the Royal Geographical Society that advances his heartland theory. In this article, Mackinder extended the scope of geopolitical analysis to encompass the entire globe. He defined Afro-Eurasia as the “world island” and its “heartland” as the area east of the Volga, south of the Arctic, west of the Yangtze, and north of the Himalayas. Wikipedia]

 

And so then you bias towards a more commercial form of government, a form of government that is kind of dominated more by commercial interests. And your legal system and your political system will reflect that.

 

And so you can see, that’s why, like the Anglo Saxon world, whether it be American led or British led, has led to a more laissez faire, so to speak, liberal system.

 

Whereas the Germans and the Russians, being that they are land powers, their power isn’t necessarily derived from international trade networks, but from building up the core, the land core.

 

So you can amass, like this, these massive industrial centres and raise massive land armies that can dominate land spaces rather than oceans. And so rather than them being commercially dominated, they’re dominated more by a centralised bureaucratic structure that comports more with massive military forces. And you can see, therefore, in the history of German and Russian politics, particularly in the modern world, tendency towards illiberal political systems as a result.

 

But anyway, I definitely recommend Schmitt, particularly The Concept of the Political, which I think is integral reading.

 

[2:06:10]

 

As for an American White advocate counterpart that I especially admire. Let me put on the spot here a little bit. I have a lot of respect for James KirkPatrick, aka Kevin Deanna, who he works with Vdare, and American Renaissance, but he’s his own man. He’s got one of the best Twitter accounts, very good political analysis, been around for a very long time, and kind of just like, generally very well respected across the scene by most factions. I would say that his analysis is very good because he basically boils everything down to just a pure White Identity Politics position, like pure White identitarianism. No frills, really, no cucking. Incredibly ideologically consistent. And this actually comports with my idea about Carl Schmitt and The Concept of the Political. He has a very Schmittian approach to White identitarianism.

 

In other words, he has a lot of respect for the friend-enemy distinction. Like for Schmitt, the core essence of politics is the distinction between friend and enemy. Not between your personal friends and enemies, but between the public friend and enemy.

 

In other words, who are you willing to fight for? And who are you willing to fight against?

 

In other words, what is the particular way of life and identity that you identify with? Unto war, unto revolution, unto existential conflict. And obviously, if we make that determination in White racial terms, then that then becomes like a totalizing political view. And all other political issues need to be fundamentally processed through a kind of pro-White friend-enemy distinction. And I think his political analysis does that quite effectively.

 

MLG also said:

 

“Will watch on replay. Great work, fellas. Supporting from London.”

 

Thomas Sewell: Is Greg Johnson a faggot?

 

Joel Davis: Yes.

 

Thomas Sewell: People spread rumours about that. Is that true? Is it?

 

Joel Davis: It’s not rumours.

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, that’s sad.

 

Joel Davis: You didn’t know that he was a faggot? That’s unfortunate.

 

Thomas Sewell: I had people say, I don’t own any of his books, but I’ve been kind of buying up some books recently. And someone said to me:

 

“Oh, Greg Johnson’s a faggot.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Oh, that’s a shame.”

 

Joel Davis: Unfortunate, because his outfit Counter-Currents, not just what he has put out, but they’ve put out a lot of good stuff over the years because they’ve published a lot of other authors in the movement. And I don’t think you should just never read anything on their website just because he’s a faggot.

 

But at the same time, they’ve also put out pro-faggot propaganda. There actually was a really good article written by Andrew Joyce a few years ago against the pro-gay. I reread it recently, but yeah, against the kind of pro-gay articles they put out on Counter-Currents, where they would have stuff basically insinuating that being homophobic is actually jewish [Tom starts laughing] and it’s actually Aryan to love fags because in Greco, … Which is kind of an ahistorical analysis of Greco-Roman society, they respected fags. And then the jews came in with their Christian morality and turned us against gays!

 

Thomas Sewell: On Counter-Currents, there’s a book by a guy called James J. O’Meara called The Homo and the Negro.

 

 

And then the blurb says that it’s basically about how homosexuals have been integral for building civilisation because they don’t waste time with women. It’s kind of like that what’s that other faggot? He wrote a book. It’s kind of like Baps [sp] theory book. And it’s about, it’s kind of like manosphere culture, how women are just purely for utility.

 

Anyway, it doesn’t matter. It’s all gay shit! Who cares?

 

Joel Davis: Literally [chuckling] all gay shit!

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. It’s just gay shit! I really don’t like faggots. They’re just traitors to life. They’re not just traitors to the race. They’re traitors to life. There’s nothing noble in faggotry. There’s nothing, like, if they dedicate themselves to art, why do they have to be a faggot? Like, you don’t have to be a faggot to dedicate yourself to art. You can still be heterosexual. [chuckling] You know what I mean? It’s like a strange cope. It’s like I can’t get rid of the faggot artist, like:

 

“Oh, I can’t get rid of the gay thoughts.”

 

So instead of trying to deal with that or whatever, fix that problem, however the fuck you can fix it, I don’t know. They’re like:

 

“I’ll just dedicate myself to expanding Western civilisation in this realm.”

 

But it’s like anything they create is ultimately going to be tainted by their poor spirit. Like, they’ve got a bad spirit, a gay spirit.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Their life forces has been totally perverted at the fundamental level.

 

Thomas Sewell: So how do you trust any art that they create? There’s going to be something sick in it. There’s going to be something twisted in it.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Because from a metaphysical standpoint, like a male, a masculine-feminine duality, I think, is really in the essence of the entire universe. Like, you could even, like, look at, like, subatomic relationships through that lens.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Electromagnetism through that lens and so on, all the way up through, like, life! That’s the force that perpetuates life, is the masculine-feminine polarity. So that’s corrupted in someone’s personality. It’s kind of like the very kind of core of their life essence has been corrupted. It’s almost worse than almost anything else as a result of that because it’s so fundamentally fucked!

 

So if someone is a faggot, a sodomite, it’s like, almost like almost anything that comes out of their mouth, you kind of have to almost disregard because there’s no foundation from which anything good could come. Like, they might actually say something accurate at times, but it’s just not worth even listening, because they’re a faggot.

 

But when it comes to someone like Greg Johnson, like, I’ve seen complicity from his publication in publishing pro-homosexual apologia, which just then becomes subversive. You know, then it’s like this rationalisation of why we need to be more accepting towards homosexuals and so on.

 

Like, if the jews invented homophobia, then I would just have to give to the jews credit for coming up with a good idea that would be like, one W to the jews. But they didn’t! Homophobia actually is in every, pretty much every, like, culture ever in human history.

 

[2:13:07]

 

Thomas Sewell: So jews are probably the least homophobic. So that is completely subversive because it’s a complete, …

 

Joel Davis: Tel Aviv is literally the gayest city on earth.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah. Jews don’t have an issue with gays. They want to sow seeds of chaos everywhere.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think also niggers are the gayest race statistically as well.

 

Thomas Sewell: They are! That’s why they’ve got AIDS and Monkeypox.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: My God keeps cursing them.

 

Joel Davis: Well, that’s not, I don’t know if that’s why God keeps cursing them. It’s just, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Well, it’s par for the course. [chuckling] You can’t behave that way and not have consequences. There’s consequences for all things against natural law.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I think niggas might be just kind of cursed just by being born as niggas in the first place. [LOL]

 

Thomas Sewell: For sure!

 

Joel Davis: Like, they probably did something fucked up in their past life.

 

Thomas Sewell: Absolutely!

 

Joel Davis: Like, according to the Mormon cosmology, you know, primordially before the beginning of the universe, you know, there was a battle in heaven, and there were all these celestial beings and Lucifer, you know, tried to raise this rebellion against God. And then basically everyone who was complicit in that rebellion became the demons. And everyone who fought on the side of Jesus and God, they became incarnated as White people. And then everyone who stayed neutral, they became the niggers! I’m not saying I believe in Mormonism, obviously, but it’s kind of based. It’s kind of funny.

 

Blair Cottrell: I remain for those, … Sorry, I’m too tired to even spit the phrase:

 

“The hottest fires of hell are reserved for those who remain neutral in times of struggle!”

 

I think it was Gandhi who said that?

 

Thomas Sewell: It would be an ancient question quote. Gandhi’s a fraud!

 

Blair Cottrell: Probably.

 

Joel Davis: Anyway, I’ll go through some more of these Superchats. I think you guys posted them in here. Yeah. Ukrainian Groyper, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Dante’s Inferno*. That’s where that quote is from. That’s from Dante’s Inferno. The first layer of hell is for the inactive, the people that don’t get active, the people that don’t pick a side. That’s the first layer of hell. Yeah.

 

[* Inferno is the first part of Italian writer Dante Alighieri’s 14th-century narrative poem The Divine Comedy. It is followed by Purgatorio and Paradiso. The Inferno describes the journey of a fictionalised version of Dante himself through (the nine levels of) Hell, guided by the ancient Roman poet Virgil. Wikipedia]

 

Joel Davis: Ukrainian Groyper said:

 

“Joel is the only one out of the three who doesn’t have a Wikipedia page. How am I supposed to know that he’s a Nazi?”

 

Yeah, well, I thought about creating a Wikipedia page for myself, and then I realised it would immediately get taken over by Leftists and then converted into like, this awful hit piece about how I’m a satanic paedophile or something. So I decided I would just try and live without a Wikipedia page as long as possible, because yeah, we don’t control. [chuckling] Wikipedia is not under patriot control.

 

Thomas Sewell: Not yet. We’re working on it. First mission is to change my profile picture on Wikipedia to a good one. That’s your first mission Wikipedia guys. [chuckling] Not like a screen grab from an old video.

 

Joel Davis: RSA Liberty Supporter said:

 

“You start with the most generous re-migration package and crank it up from there. You two step them and the Liberals incentivise them to take the earliest option as it’s in their best interests.”

 

That’s the thing. I don’t really think that’s what we’re getting here. I mean, ultimately, we talking about, … Could you even call them conservatives? But we’re talking about like, the Swedish, like, mainstream Right, who has been complicit in like, mass immigration. They’re not initiating phase one of like a six phase process to like purify the Swedish population and send millions back or anything, and work their way towards mass deportations. It’s limited measure that they probably don’t intend to go much further then.

 

So, yeah, someone also said here, Thorn 91:

 

“I know not everyone here is Christian, but Obadiah 18 prophesies the end of the jews.”

 

Obadiah 18? I don’t remember that from the Bible.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I just searched that before. It’s just like:

 

“Jacob will be fire and Joseph will be flames and Esau will crumble!”

 

Joel Davis: Okay. Yeah. Okay. I’m looking up the book of Obadiah. Okay, I just don’t really remember reading that in the Bible. “Prophecy concerning the divine judgement of Edom and the restoration of Israel”. That’s kind of interesting because of how the Edomites ultimately kind of got fused with the Judeans in like, the second century. But anyway, we’re not going to get, … That’s a bit of a tangent.

 

Man Before Time said:

 

“Have you done much reading from the Stoics, particularly Aurelius, Epictetus, Plato. So what aspect of Stoicism, personally, think is the most important?”

 

I don’t think you can classify Plato as a stoic. But, yeah, Marcus Aurelius. I have read some of the meditations many, many years ago. I don’t really take much inspiration.

 

[2:18:55]

 

 

Thomas Sewell: Prison ideology. It’s a prison ideology in my opinion.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

But I know that some of the other Stoics, like, they were more complicated philosophers that had a full on metaphysics. And I read about them as being discussed by, like, Gilles Deleuze* and other, like, 20th century philosophers. But I haven’t gone back to the stoics and got their complete system. So I don’t actually have a super well educated view on the full philosophical system of the Stoics.

 

[* Gilles Deleuze (January 18, 1925–November 4, 1995) was one of the most influential and prolific French philosophers of the second half of the twentieth century. Deleuze conceived of philosophy as the production of concepts, and he characterized himself as a “pure metaphysician.” In his magnum opus Difference and Repetition, he tries to develop a metaphysics adequate to contemporary mathematics and science—a metaphysics in which the concept of multiplicity replaces that of substance, event replaces essence and virtuality replaces possibility. Standord Encyclopedia of Philosophy]

 

But as for Marcus Aurelius the fact that he was a literal cuckold, out of condition a little bit. Yeah. It’s like, imagine the worst possible outcome and learn to accept it so that you can confront it when it occurs. It’s like, no, I’d rather just not imagine my wife getting slammed by some gladiator. And he ended up, like, I think the story was he ends up killing the gladiator and then filling a bathtub with his blood and then shagging his missus in the bathtub or something along those lines.

 

Thomas Sewell: He sounds like Jordan Peterson.

 

Joel Davis: Why don’t you kill the woman? You know, she cheated on you. Why are you killing the gladiator? I mean, you can kill him, too, if you want. You’re the emperor. But kill the woman like she cheated on you. Why are you?

 

Thomas Sewell: We don’t need that blood. We don’t need that blood in the family, that’s for sure.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Like, I don’t understand this about cheating. Like, if you get cheated on and you’re going after the person like that you weren’t actually in a relationship with, but the secondary, … I understand you might want to take some revenge on them, but the more primary thing is the actual person who cheated on you. Like, they should be the main culprit. They’re the main culprit. They’re the ones who portrayed you. The other person didn’t.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, it’s hard to see it that way when you’re a young man, because you see the woman as, like, a victim of circumstance. Because when you’re young, that’s kind of how you’re raised to see women. And because women are beautiful, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I still see it that way.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah. But when women are beautiful, when you’re a young man, too, you kind of see them as, well you imagine that you associate their beauty with innocence. Yeah. You don’t think that someone or anything that looks that good could do something so consciously and deliberately bad.

 

And so you always think it was the male party who’s at fault. And because it’s a man, you feel that urge for violence, for confrontation, but you don’t feel that with a woman. So by default or instincts, you hold the, if you’re in a love triangle, you hold the male party, the other male party, wholly responsible until you actually calm down and think about it. And then you realise the woman was probably orchestrating the entire thing.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I’m not against going after the man as well. I can just go after both of them, though. Don’t just go after, like, you kill the gladiator and then what does the woman get as a, … You’re the emperor of Rome, your wife cheats on you!

 

Blair Cottrell: And the way I look at it now, though, like. In truth, unless you have some sort of reputation to maintain, there’s no reason to be bent on revenge over some girl. If some girl leaves you, who cares? Someone else is having sex with her now. Who cares, man? You’re a man. The world is yours. Do whatever you want. If you want revenge, do that. If it means that much to you.

 

Joel Davis: If you’re the emperor of Rome and she’s your wife.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, that’s different. That’s what I mean. There’s reputation.

 

Thomas Sewell: He has the power to do something about it. And he gets psyopped by a woman to not. Like that’s what she wants. Like any woman that does that kind of behaviour. Like, if women don’t want to be with you, they’ll just leave, right? It’s pretty simple. So if they’re doing that and staying with you, it’s because they want it both ways.

 

Blair Cottrell: Women won’t leave you. They’ll tee up an alternative before they leave you. So if a woman’s thinking about leaving you, …

 

Thomas Sewell: They won’t cheat and then stay with you. Like, if their intention is to leave, it’s, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Like there’s different reasons. Some women will treat cheat to get a reaction out of you, or just to cause drama. But typically what women will do if they don’t like you is they’ll stop sleeping with you and then yeah, …

 

Thomas Sewell: They monkey branch on to something else.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah, they monkey branch. They set something else up and if that doesn’t work, they stay with you until they can get something else set up. They just kind of like a butterfly onto the next flower. Onto the next flower, sucking out all the nutrients until there’s nothing left! [chuckling] [LOL]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, yeah. I mean, but yeah, you’re dating, like, who cares, like, if she cheats on you, it’s not worth, like, let it go and move on.

 

But if you’re like, married and you’re fully committed and then she cheats on you after you’ve got the mortgage and the two kids and so on. It’s like that bitch has got to pay! You can’t go back and like, fix that now. Like, if you were just dating and then she did, like who cares! You’ve dodged a bullet. Like, it’s good that she’s shown her hand early before you get committed you can read the signs and, …

 

[2:24:46]

 

Blair Cottrell: Can I just say, I was thinking about this the other day in a different context. I was thinking that if a woman has social media, if your girlfriend, you’re watching this, you got a girlfriend, you got a wife, and she has social media, she’s going to cheat on you [Tom laughs]. And she will. They can’t have social media because of the female human condition, which is hypergamous in by nature. They can’t even help it! Women are always looking for upgrades, not just in relationships per se, but in their life. That’s why women always want the bigger house and the better car and the nicer holiday. And they’re looking for upgrades in men as well, whether it’s wealth, status, height, genetics. And if a woman is given access to social media, she’s eventually going to full victim to her own hypergamous nature. She’s going to cheat on you. It’s only a matter of time. It might take five years, it might take 15 years, it will happen! If you’re a woman watching this and you’re interested in a serious relationship that isn’t going to break down, delete your social media! If you don’t have the strength to do that, you’ll never be in a long term relationship that won’t break down eventually. You can’t have social media as a woman. You just can’t fucking do it!

 

Joel Davis: I don’t know.

 

Thomas Sewell: I mean, [word unclear] banned from social media.

 

Joel Davis: I think, basically it’s not actually that intense. Like, every woman is gonna cheat on you. Like, as far as I know, no woman ever cheated on me. Like, it’s not like:

 

“Oh, every bitch is just gonna leave you and so on!”

 

I don’t really have that mentality, to be honest. I think you can actually tell, like, if the relationship is fucked up or not. If you’re really, like, honest and reflective on the dynamics within the relationship, you can kind of see the signs that it’s messed up or not.

 

And then if you continue to persist on with it despite it being fundamentally flawed and you’re a bad match and she doesn’t actually respect you or you don’t really love her or whatever, then you’re asking for it to go wrong. In Marcus Aurelius’ situation that woman was obviously a whore. Like, he was retard for even, … What kind of woman cheats on the Roman emperor? You know what I mean?

 

Thomas Sewell: Drama Queen. Attention seeking drama queen.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah.

 

Thomas Sewell: Specifically the social media. That’s a problem. I know it sounds silly, but specifically Instagram, for our generation, at least. Facebook, not so much. You know, Snapchat. It’s sort of dorky. It’s just sort of sending stupid videos. I don’t know much about TikTok because it’s more of a Zoomer thing. But Instagram specifically, the way the algorithm is programmed is that it keeps feeding you. I mean, I guess they’re all like this, especially TikTok. But Instagram is very personal. It’s not so much like a stupid dance, or a stupid thing. It’s sexual advertising. Instagram is purely sexual advertising. It’s just like soft Tinder. It’s basically, …

 

Blair Cottrell: Pretty much. The guy who made Tinder got his idea from Instagram. People were already using Instagram messages, basically as a Tinder service, and some guy was like:

 

“I could make an app just doing this.”

 

And that’s how that took off. But men are liars, too. So the second part of my message to women is you can’t have social media if you want the serious relationship due to your own female human condition, which is hypergamous. But you’ll get tricked by lying men as well, who present themselves as a potential upgrade, but they’re actually not! So you’ll end up cheating on your husband or partner for no fucking reason! There’s nothing but disaster on social media for a woman in a relationship, if you’re in a relationship, …

 

Thomas Sewell: Like, Instagram is very fake. It’s built off trying to build, like, a fake Persona. It’s very, very toxic. When the government banned me from Instagram, I was actually kind of happy. I know these nationalism starting up on the, … Young guys tell me that on Instagram. Not young, young, but, like, kind of halfway between us and Zoomers. They say that there’s a lot of nationalist circles on Instagram now. There’s a lot of different cliques forming and a lot of pages now to follow. It’s all above board, so to speak. Like, it back in the day, it was all banned and shut down.

 

But now they’re kind of working out the algorithm, how to get around it. So that there’s a positive to that. Like, we’ve had a couple recruits from Instagram. I think we’ve had two recruits from Instagram. Obviously not our primary recruiter. But again, Instagram is not really that political. It’s mostly sexual. Instagram is a sexual platform.

 

Joel Davis: It’s just a shit platform. Like, I remember I had it briefly when I was a teenager, and I just stopped using it because I don’t want to look at a bunch of people’s fucking faces and:

 

“Here’s me doing this, and here’s a picture of my, like oh, we went on a fuck! We went here, we went there!”

 

And I don’t give a fuck! You know?

 

[2:29:42]

 

Blair Cottrell: Are you sure you don’t want to set up a selfie stick and a tripod and take a picture of yourself proposing to your future wife and show the world, get some rose petals and throw them in the lens. Are you sure you don’t want to do that, Joel? I mean, what’s wrong with you?

 

Thomas Sewell: Is that your algorithm? Blair, just rose petals?

 

Blair Cottrell: This is what people do. This is what people do in this. I’ve got Instagram. I’ve got a business, Instagram, for work. I barely use it. I get most of my work through Telegram. But whenever I go on there, I see people I’ve known in the past who found me on there and that you look at their profiles, and everyone thinks they’re a fucking rock star. Everyone thinks they’re famous, and they act like they’re famous. No one gives a shit about when you propose to your wife and how you did it. That should be something between you and your wife. Why the fuck am I looking at this? It’s the weirdest shit! It’s this strange. I don’t know how to say it.

 

Thomas Sewell: It’s very personal. Outside of that level. Yeah. Yes. All right. Are we done?

 

Blair Cottrell: We’ve got one more Superchat. Did you read out this Jake 1219? He’s sent 20 bucks. The tide of the Caine. No, sorry:

 

“The tide for Caine will rise for the brotherhood.”

 

He said:

 

“What’s the tide for Caine?

 

Thomas Sewell: What’s that, like a Command and Conquer Generals reference? Was that like a Red Alert or what? Was it Tiberian Sun? Is it a gamer reference?

 

Blair Cottrell: I don’t know. Maybe. We have to find out. Obviously we need to find out.

 

Thomas Sewell: There’s an old movie about. Was it Citizen Kane? Okay. 12th century. The story of King Canute. The tide of, … I don’t know. No, I can’t find it.

 

Joel Davis: Superchats from Goyboy 1488 on uh, Odysee.

 

So I’m going to read them out. He said:

 

“First of all, imagine being the father of the kids who bullied faggot Jeffrey must be so proud.”

 

Obviously referring to the Jeffrey kid that became a tranny. That in Tom’s story at the beginning of the stream, Goyboy 1488 also said, qi can’t stand American libertarians. So individualistic that they defend gun ownership for illegal migrants.”

 

Yeah, I understand the insufferability of libertarians. It’s a little bit different in Australia. The point of focus, it isn’t just like the single minded fixation upon, and honestly, we need some gun rights. Like, in America, you guys actually have gun rights. Ours have been destroyed. So I’m with libertarians here on working our way back towards more gun ownership.

 

But yeah, obviously in America it can get ridiculous where it’s like instead of caring about any, it’s like gun nationalism where like, owning guns is like what defines the nation. Like being pro-gun rather than having any actual ethnic concept of the nation or whatever. It’s like, yeah. Oh, Goyboy also said:

 

“They have no loyalty to their people.”

 

Obviously talking about libertarians. He said:

 

“Both my brothers are 110 to 130 IQ libertarians. They are politically insufferable!”

 

Obviously libertarians need to be worked on to progress them beyond their worldview. Usually they’re open to having a conversation.

 

And so there’s fertile ground there. A lot of people in the movement were former libertarians that were converted to the nationalist worldview. But then, yeah, there’s a certain kind of like holding pen where they stay libertarian because they have either this kind of hyper individualistic fixation on themselves and they never mature out of it or they get Asian missus. Tom said that, I think you had an experience, right, of like going to some libertarian meeting years ago and like everyone’s missus was Asian.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, I went to the LDP Victorian meeting, annual general meeting, whatever it is.

 

Joel Davis: And this is the Libertarian Party by the way.

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, Lionel Helm [sp] was there, the chairman was there, there was a few other speakers. And honestly the audience was almost entirely White men in their late twenties. And about maybe 20% of the audience brought their girlfriends and almost all their girlfriends were Asian. And I was the last question because it was a Question Time. And Lionel Helm was a full weirdo. Like it was really, he was really bizarre in person. He was way more autistic than I realised. And I’m pretty sure his food came out first. And he was like halfway through his speech and he just stopped his speech and just ate his food in front of everyone. Like just like a super autist! Like couldn’t read the room, like didn’t give a fuck! Like it was a real bad look. I don’t know, I guess we’re all different. But it was really, really strange thing to do.

 

And then I was the last question and I brought up immigration. And this is fucking pretty early days, this is like 2017 or something. And I said to him basically:

 

“As a young person, I can’t afford a home in the area I grew up in or even really a couple suburbs over. It’s just becoming unaffordable. The housing crisis is a massive issue. And what’s the Liberal Democrats going to do about trying to assist housing affordability fee for young people that are just pushed out of the market every year it’s getting harder.”

 

I was looking at a house, it was 700 grand. It was just around the absolute cap at that point of my borrowing capacity.

 

And by the time I actually tried to go to the bank and look at getting that house and working out how to make the finances of the work and save up the deposit, all the house in that area went up to about 770, 800. So I’m like:

 

“Fuck! I gotta go another suburb, another couple suburbs over!”

 

And I was just explaining that to him and he said something like:

 

“Oh well the LDP, we’re gonna do less taxes. Less taxes means more money in your pocket. Anyway, next question.”

 

And I was like:

 

“Hang on a minute, hang on a minute. If everyone’s paying less taxes, if everyone’s got more money in their pocket, then the housing price is gonna go up, everyone’s got more expendable income. Everyone’s got more.”

 

Anyway, that’s the story I’ve already said on stream before. But yeah, it was an interesting meeting. My second question was about cadre building. It was about:

 

“Do the libertarians as classical liberals or as classical libertarians, whatever you guys are you interested in building up a cadre of people that believe in the ideology, truly understand it, and then sort of pass that worldview on to the rest of the population? Or are you kind of just hoping that the general public come to their senses and realise that the libertarian party is just the way forward? Is that how you perceive getting political victory?”

 

And Lionel Helm said:

 

“Yeah, the second one. Yeah, like, people were just going to realise that less taxes means more money in your pocket and more money in your pocket, less taxes on cigarettes. You buy more cigarettes, and, yeah, you just have more money. You just be better off. And eventually everyone will work that out and vote for us.”

 

And I was like, interesting. And the chairman had stopped eating his dinner and just looked up at me and was like:

 

“Who the fuck is this guy?”

 

It was really interesting night.

 

[2:37:07]

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I see, …

 

Thomas Sewell: And then, and then, sorry, quickly. And then when the meeting was done and I tried to leave, I got, like, ambushed by, like, three libertarians with Asian girlfriends. And they were like, telling me how:

 

“What were you trying to imply with immigration? Like, why were you trying to imply that it’s a supply and demand issue? I mean, really, it’s really not about demand. It’s about supply, we should build more houses. The real problem is the Liberal Party, Labor Party put too much red tape on building a house. And if we just change zoning laws, da da da da da da da. And we need a big Australia!”

 

And I was like:

 

“Okay, would you rather live in Brazil or Switzerland?”

 

“Like, what? Like, why do we need a big Australia? Why do we need to be a big Australia?”

 

And they’re like:

 

“Oh, bigger GDP is better!”

 

And I was like:

 

“Okay, so Brazil, or Switzerland?”

 

And then they just all went silent. And I was like:

 

“Yeah, you guys are fucking idiots!”

 

And then I just walked out. Like, Brazil’s GDP is like 30 times Switzerland, but you’d much rather live in Switzerland, wouldn’t you? Like, who the fuck wants to live in Brazil?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, it’s like the, …

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m sure there’s a nice parts of Brazil, but in general, it’s fucking full of crime and poverty. Like, what the fuck? Switzerland’s like a utopia.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. Like, why don’t we just combine the whole world into one country. Then we can have the ultimate maximum GDP of the whole world. GDP of one country.

 

Thomas Sewell: Genius!

 

Joel Davis: It’ll [chuckling] be a totally free market. Everyone can trade with everyone.

 

Thomas Sewell: But that’s the classic libertarian position. They’re either kind of too smart for their own good, but not intelligent enough to work out that their ideas are stupid, or they’re kind of just philosophically corrupted because they got the Asian GF, and they would go down the far-Right path, but they’re held up. They’re stuck at that level probably forever for most of them.

 

Joel Davis: Old Kiparian said:

 

“Double my cigarette prices if it means I keep my nation.”

 

Yeah, well, you should really stop smoking. As someone who has quit smoking, my advice to you is run! And then when you run, you’ll realise that you can’t, and that it sucks! And then if you keep running, you’ll continue realizing how much it sucks! And then that’ll inspire you to stop smoking so that your lungs can heal and you can actually breathe while you run. Because you need to run. If you can’t run, you could be fucked! That could literally be the end of your life because you can’t run in a certain kind of situation.

 

So, yeah, not being able to run is fucking gay!

 

Blair Cottrell: We got one more here. One more again from Jake 1219 sends through $20. Thanks very much, Jake. Serious one:

 

“40 billion being raped from Australian taxpayers yearly to fund the Aboriginal communist plight with no oversight. Thieving, that’s a serious military budget going towards dirt eaters.”

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. I also see Bog. He sent a 0.02 lbry coin Superchat on Odysee, which, when I put it into the conversion, that works out to 0.0031 US dollars! So [chuckling] you might as well have not even bothered sending a Superchat at all because that’s just literally nothing. But I’ll read it out anyway. He said:

 

“Do you promise to never take fed jew money to be draught enforcer, sending Whites to die in Taiwan for Jew Yankee Empire, or act as blocking units shooting retreating Whites there? I’m not dying on hill 838 in Ching Chong Prefecture, Oz government built Covid camp. So I’ll take my chances with Chink overlords!”

 

Thomas Sewell: Uh, no, no! he missed it at the end there. He was kind of doing well with the question until the end there. Then he fucked it. That was dumb.

 

Joel Davis: I feel like this guy is probably Chinese or something, like this kind of, …

 

[2:41:26]

 

Thomas Sewell: Oh, good call. Good call!

 

Joel Davis: Because the Chinaman would be cheap enough to send a 0.003 USD Superchat. You know what I mean?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, they were utilitarian.

 

Joel Davis: Oh, hey, fellow Aryans. Don’t you just love China?

 

Thomas Sewell: Yeah, don’t you just love your Chinese overlords? Don’t send me to go fight for Taiwan. [chuckling]

 

Joel Davis: Does it make any sense? Like there’s not going to be a ground war in Taiwan that you’re going to be conscripted to. Like, it’s even really logical.

 

Adult White Female said:

 

“We are so unique and so strong a race, and yet every time a non-gets mixed in, our genetics get blown out. Visual confirmation that it is the true definition of adultery and is an abomination unto our creator. Great show, gentlemen, and thank you. And a tenner for rose petals.”

 

Thomas Sewell: I’m done.

 

Joel Davis: And Ben Shapiro Sigma also just sent a Superchat saying, hell, Ben Shapiro Sigma is kind of funny.

 

“Hello from England. Do you have any recommendation for a place to start understanding China’s political structure and how it is National Socialist? Joel’s comments on it have been very interesting.”

 

I wouldn’t describe China as National Socialist.

 

Blair Cottrell: All right, before you answer that, I’m signing off. See you guys. Love you all.

 

Joel Davis: See you dude! Have a good one. I wouldn’t describe China as a National Socialist. Indirectly, I have done that for polemical reasons in the past, drawing more parallels between Chinese state ideology and fascism or National Socialism than doctrinaire Marxism, of which there are several parallels.

 

And I think it’s an important parallel to draw, because the Chinese government, obviously, there’s a lot of fucked up things about it, completely fucked up things that no White government, you know, actually genuinely White run government, would subject its people to. Like a great amount of brutality and so on.

 

But at the same time, the Chinese state obviously has brought big business interests and foreign interests to heel. They run China directly for the national strength, and China has managed to accumulate a lot of economic and military power in a very short period of time through that kind of system, which demonstrates when you implement certain principles of fascism or National Socialism, they make your country stronger. And that’s objectively true. When you see China, China wouldn’t be anywhere near as strong as it is if it was a liberal democracy. It was a liberal democracy. It would be beset by jews, foreign business interests, and so on. It would be subject to American or judeo-American, I should say, cultural subversion and so on. And it would be far more limited in its ability to develop its own independent power in the world.

 

So but I wouldn’t classify it as National Socialist because there’s a lot of elements to the Chinese regime I don’t like and said ideology I don’t like which are reflections I think, of the Chinese national character and the communist legacy as well like the Maoist legacy as opposed to, … So I’d say basically everything that’s good in the sense of not good for us because China being strong is actually bad for us, but good in that kind of universal sense like effective for what they’re trying to do. Like everything about the Chinese government that makes China stronger is basically National Socialists or fascist, and everything about it which sucks almost invariably isn’t. And that isn’t just a cope because of my ideological predilections like that’s just my genuine analysis of the situation.

 

But anyway, I think basically we’re done here, so see you guys later. It’s been a long stream I hope you enjoyed it and yeah, we’ll see you all next week.

 

[2:45:39]

 

 

END

top

 

 

 

============================================

 

Odysee Comments

top

(Comments as of 9/15/2024 = 35)

Se7enius
2 days ago
letsgooooo
8 likes

ForOurPeople
1 day ago
catholic charities started from the Church centuries ago, but now works for and is funded by the government and that’s why they are helping flood our nations with foreigners
7 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
ForOurPeople
1 day ago
in America under Biden (who’s supposed to be Catholic) the government agencies have spies in traditional Catholic churches and have made raids at the homes of traditional Catholic activists homes
2 likes

WillyPete9
1 day ago
Soooo Jewish misinformation/disinformation is still legal? So confusing
7 likes

‹ Hide 2 replies
averagefreedomenjoyer
1 day ago
yes Jewish misinformation is what mainstream media is.
1 like

EternalReich
22 hours ago
Huh?….
0 likes

ForOurPeople
1 day ago
the government that doesn’t fear the people is the problem
5 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
AllegianceMountain
18 hours ago
good quote
1 like

ProvingNihil
1 day ago
As an animal lover especially of cat’s and dog’s. What those dirty inhuman apes are doing to those innocent creature’s piss me off beyond belief. I would go to jail/prison if one of them attempted to harm my cat or dog.
5 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
GovMarioPalmieri
1 day ago
guy we got grifted. the footage is from 2020 and the bitch isn’t Haitian. beware click baiters mocking these very real problems.
1 like

‹ Hide 2 replies
averagefreedomenjoyer
1 day ago
how is ni66ers killing cats and dogs different from Haitians?
2 likes

ProvingNihil
16 hours ago
Are you sure? Not being a prick btw, I swear I saw a video of a Haitian woman skinning a cat.
1 like

katana17
2 days ago
Last week’s show: [Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/09/07/joel-davis-wwii-revisionism-re-enters-the-mainstream-sep-6-2024-transcript/ [In this livestream episode Aussie nationalist activists Joel Davis, Blair Cottrell and Tom Sewell discuss the recent Tucker Carlson interview with American historian Darryl Cooper and how he considers: “The real bad guy of World War Two was Churchill.” Points include: • View the interview as a watershed moment for mainstreaming revisionist narratives. • “This is the re-mainstreaming for the first time in that I can remember in living memory of World War two revisionism.” • Cooper’s approach is a “humanitarian” and “honest” way to discuss controversial topics. • Discuss Churchill’s role in WWII, with Cooper calling him “the foremost villain” of the war. • Explore the idea of having “Nuremberg-style trials” for those responsible for mass immigration. • Discuss the importance of World War II revisionism in understanding current political issues. “World War two really is the datum point from which all perspective of the present day is forged.” • They share their personal journeys into World War II revisionism and White nationalism. • Discuss the impact of reading Mein Kampf and other revisionist materials. “Reading Mein Kampf and learning the truth about world War two breaks the spell of Holocaustianity.” • World War II narratives are central to current anti-White ideologies. • Discuss the challenges of promoting revisionist views
in mainstream discourse. • The importance of ideological purity in their movement. “Maximum ideological purity can actually disadvantage you because it means you’re going to piss people off, alienate people.” • Discuss the role of social media and online activism in spreading their ideas. • Share anecdotes about discussing their views
in everyday situations. • Talk about recruitment and the growing interest …
2 likes

Delete
katana17
2 days ago
For tonight’s show a relevant topic is 9/11. [Christopher Bollyn – Tricked into War – Israeli Zionist Government was Behind the 9/11 Attack – Sep 20, 2018 – Transcript] https://katana17.com/2024/09/12/christopher-bollyn-tricked-into-war-israeli-zionist-government-was-behind-the-9-11-attack-sep-20-2018-transcript/ [In this 2018 presentation Christopher Bollyn, an American investigative journalist and author of several books on 9/11 sets out in detail, naming names, on why and how Israel carried out the, years in preparation, false flag attack 9/11, i.e., to unleash The War OF Terror on the Middle East using American blood and treasure. Some points Bollyn makes, include: Is an author of books on 9/11 and the War on Terror. 9/11 and the War on Terror are connected and part of an Israeli plan. “9/11 was a policy coup” blamed on Muslims to start the War on Terror. The War on Terror aims to redraw the Middle East map according to Israeli interests. Menachem Begin, founder of Likud party, is described as “the father of terrorism”. 9/11 was designed to “instill fear and rage in the American population”. The War on Terror is “the longest and most expensive war, foreign war in US history”. Trump is quoted: “We have spent $7 trillion in the Middle East. You know what we have for it? Nothing!” The War on Terror is “based on the official myth of 9/11”. Wesley Clark is quoted describing a “policy coup” by “hard-nosed people” after 9/11. The plan is to “take out seven countries in five years” starting with Iraq. This follows the “Yinon Plan” to break up Arab states into smaller entities. Hillary Clinton is mentioned as seeking to overthrow Syria’s government “to save Israel”. Asks “Is the United States waging Israel’s wars?” Israel wants to expand from “the Nile river to the Euphrates”. Christian Zionism is “a big problem” in supporting Israel. John F. Kennedy was “the last great reformer” who challenged these interests. …
2 likes

Delete
EternalReich
22 hours ago
The tangents are fine. But everybody does tangents that’s all anyone does. I respect you guys because of your activism. We don’t need another fucking show where a few people sit around and talk about how bad it is for white people. We know. The thing that sets you guys apart is you actually strategize and discuss the best way to make more people aware. That is what we should all be doing. We don’t need another Nick Fuentes or red ice, sitting in front of a camera and talking about news articles and asking for donations. It’s crazy to me, how so many of us know that we are on a sinking ship, but so many are content to just play video games and occasionally watch videos about white replacement online, and this pacifies us. I always get frustrated because I always have the sensation kind of like your underwater and you are starting to get desperate for a breath, I have that anxiety every time I think about our situation, and it frustrates the hell out of me to see so many who don’t care at all. And when you talk about trying to meet up and brainstorm and do things, it’s fed posting. On one hand I can understand the concern, but on the other hand why even bother discussing it at all then? If trying to organize is fed posting and we can’t do it, then we may as well accept our fate and just enjoy the ride.
2 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
AllegianceMountain
18 hours ago
The Patriot Front is a viable group to get involved with. I do not believe the accusations that they are set up by the feds. Even if oneself doesn’t join a local active-club, there’s fliers and posters and stickers you can print at home, laminate, and distribute in public places to stimulate people’s awareness of the dystopian living conditions. The monopoly on mass media and mass entertainment is one of our great obstacles, IMO. Because mass media and mass culture is how the average normie talks to him/herself and how they “validate” what is an acceptable viewpoint or opinion. Still, even without us overthrowing the corrupt leftist media-matrix, there’s human instinct to sew seed of optimism. Life will find a way, as Jeff Goldblum once said. You’re definitely correct about the role video-game, sports entertainment, and pop-culture distractions are strategically put into place to lessen and hinder the inevitable instinctive awakening of hive-mind survival response among our folk. Joel, Tom, and Blaire (as well as other individuals in our movement worldwide) are examples of what one man can do when he doesn’t resign to stagnant pessimism and what one man can do to inspire others in proportion to the ripple-effect, contagious nature of inspiration, and other facts of sentient existence
1 like

RSALiberty
Supporter
1 day ago
Come for the tangents, stay for the news
1 like

Rockwell1488Pierce
1 day ago
Follow Joel and Blair on twitter, Tom on (telegram) https://x.com/joeldavisx https://t.me/Thomas_Sewell https://x.com/b_cottrell89
1 like

augustonvenus
1 day ago
1:13:40 Blair had me dying
1 like

johnnyboy2324
Supporter
1 day ago
o/ o/
1 like

TherealMcCoy88
1 day ago
Haitians are the deepest darkest looking Africans. They are so dark sometimes they look a dark purple. This comes a guy who grew up in Brockton, MA. We had Haitians. They are retarded.
1 like

AllegianceMountain
18 hours ago
You guys have inspired me to be more open and explicit with my left-leaning friends. Last week for example, I was on vacation w/ friends and these are ppl I’ve been friends w/ a long time and they trust me, love me, and have faith in my intelligence/morality, and when they began mocking and ridiculing DJT, I chose to verbally debate my friends in a calm composed way (instead of not even bothering to engage in verbal debate). There are two tactics I adopt; 1.) I either deliberately banter in an ambiguous way where I choose the conservative neutral stance in which to defend Trump and dispel/disarm their far-left regurgitated nonsense. or… 2.) I choose my debate stance in self-reaffirming unapologetic nationalistic old-world sensibility. On two separate occasions I was poked and prodded by female friends in their obsessive offensive to “expose” me for my underlying reasons for why I won’t denounce or disavow Trump, and similarly how I won’t denounce country-clubs, blue-bloods, and traditional family structure and the right for husbands to beat their wives and discipline their children, etc. I chose a shift in approach whereby I now don’t even care anymore. I admit I support all things “far-right”, nationalistic and pro-White. My friends are learning to deal with it, and my gut instinct tells me that a couple of my male friends are actually starting to align themselves more w/ me now that I’ve endured the initial scrutiny and carved a path for them, as it were. Of course it’s a larger paradox pattern, whereby as long as more of us first-wave vanguard white-nationalists pave the way, then some of our more intelligent friends will follow, especially if the friendship is built on real trust and real respect
1 like

MelancholyMonkey
11 hours ago
Good one, lads.
1 like

WillyPete9
1 day ago
re: Mr Clark…willing to bet the bag that the read script & money came in smelled of bagels
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
averagefreedomenjoyer
1 day ago
oy vey shut it down!
0 likes

Venedith666
1 day ago
awwww I was hoping for a few laughs watching the lefties cop beatings by cops this week in Melbourne
0 likes

PhooeyPhoxide
1 day ago
Jews and their brown bioweapons
0 likes

CrazyRecluse
1 day ago
joel u need to watch this to understand how the russian propaganda works with the western propaganda. 2 sides of the kosher sandwich: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6L7F-tWSQQ
0 likes

GIONtheDON
1 day ago
Before Sweden raised the price only 1 immigrant left
0 likes

ProvingNihil
1 day ago
And that boys father is in complete denial, what a fucking pussy can’t accept a reality check.
0 likes

AidsBug
1 day ago
If you wanna stop smoking you need to not be still for a few weeks. When you’re busy moving and doing stuff the addiction thoughts don’t creep up on you nearly as much. Exhaust yourself during the day so you can get to sleep without a crazy battle of thoughts at night.
0 likes

‹ Hide 1 reply
GovMarioPalmieri
1 day ago
ku cucks klan
0 likes

Nordicshaman88
10 hours ago
Love you three guys keep up the good streams need more like these.
0 likes

david43
8 hours ago
America is not far behind the bitch people in Australia, the good whites have been neutered and it makes me sick… our main people are petrified to say isreal is behind anything, terrible
0 likes

JungleEaglesNest
7 hours ago
Dante quote The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who, in a time of moral crisis, maintain their neutrality
0 likes

==========================

See Also

top

 

 

/>

Joel Davis – WWII Revisionism Re-enters the Mainstream – Sep 6, 2024 – Transcript

Jacob Hersant: The never ending tide of non-White immigration is drowning us! We are but 25 million in Australia and New Zealand, ten thousand miles from our brothers in Europe and surrounded by a Third World coloured masses. Everywhere we look, we see the foreign faces leering with thoughts of taking their land!

But make no mistake about it, they’re guests here and they’re unwelcome! It’s our civilisation! These islands belong to us, and we’ll fight for them! That’s what they’ll never understand. These scum that leave their kind to parasitise off us! With the nerve to insult and make demands of us in our country!

Yet what do they offer us to return? They can only pollute our blood and dishonour the estate our ancestors left us. The time has come to set us back! No more apathy! No more patience! No more tolerance! Get out! Australia for the Whiteman! The rest must go! Mass deportation now! Blood and honour! Blood and honour! Blood and honour! Blood and honour! Australia for the Whiteman! The rest must go! Australia for the Whiteman! The rest must go! Shut up you race traitor! Hail victory! Hail victory!

 

Joel Davis: Just realised my mic was muted.

 

Another show Thursday night.

 

Blair Cottrell: I was going to tell you bro, you’re muted.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, Thursday night, August 1, 2024, 8:30 Australian Eastern Time. So another show. Tom can’t make it tonight. He’s got a family engagement. I was actually going to get Jacob Hersant, but didn’t quite work out. I might do a stream with him separately to discuss some things in the future, but it’s going to be Blair and I this evening.

 

And yeah, Joel and Blair show has Joel and Blair on it, so should be an interesting show. I got one Superchat from Ukrainian Groyper that said:

 

“Hey, Joel, they banned your Telegram channel for the iPhone users.”

 

Yeah, I got my Telegram channel got App blocked on both just like ten minutes or 15 minutes before we went live on the stream. So that kind of sucks! I might have to make a new Telegram as a result. It’s kind of inexplicable. I don’t think I really posted anything outrageous lately in comparison to what I generally post, so don’t know why that happened, but once it happens, you can’t reverse it.

 

Like it happened to Tom Sewell’s channel. And there’s no appeal process. I mean, you can still access my Telegram if you download the a directly from the Telegram website onto your Android phone or on the web a if you use Telegram on a computer, on a desktop. If you’re on an iPhone, basically, you can’t access Telegram without the blockages that they put on certain channels without going through the browser.

 

So that’s quite annoying for Apple users.

 

And so it’s kind of just annoying in general when you get App blocked because it kind of takes out maybe a third of your audience from being able to see your channel.

 

So maybe more so that really sucks, but it is what it is. We soldier on!

 

But yeah, Blair, how are you feeling this evening?

 

 

Blair Cottrell: Fine. I actually saw your channel get censored because I shared the link for this stream. It was visible. I was using an Apple device when I shared it, and then I checked it five minutes later and I couldn’t see it anymore. So I said:

 

“Bro, you’ve just been Apple banned!”

 

And it’s pretty annoying because it reduces your channel traffic by at least 50% because at least half people out there are still using iPhones. It’s iPhone technology is good. It’s easy, and so it draws in the people who want to be using the easy services.

 

But you can make a Joel Davis alerts channel like Tom did, just to keep everyone., … You can keep using your main channel and just make, like, a secondary alerts channel that’s not censored, that can still reach people. The amount of people who are using Telegram, dissidents, people who are interested in nationalism, seems to have reduced somewhat since those lockdowns and vaccine mandates.

 

Joel Davis: Because Twitter was bought by Elon Musk and Twitter is just a better platform now.

 

Blair Cottrell: Definitely! Everyone’s moved over to X. Telegram is still a reliable alternative, but it seems to be most of the traffic is moving through X at the moment. So Telegram is still a sort of corner alternative platform, and you’re still allowed to post on X, is that right?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, my Twitter’s fine.

 

Blair Cottrell: Yeah.

 

Joel Davis: Well, I don’t see the point in having one, like, two different channels.

 

And, I mean, I’ll keep the other one up for a little while I transition, but it seems better to just make a whole new channel. And I’m sure the majority of the audience that actually check the channel will probably move over.

 

[06:12]

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s annoying that you don’t have any information about why you’ve been censored. There’s no appeal process. You don’t actually understand what’s going on. Like, you’re just kind of targeted because of who you are. But that’s the way censorship seems to roll out these days. It’s like you didn’t really say anything specifically that they’re concerned about. It’s just everything you believe and who you are, that’s the problem.

 

Joel Davis: It’s not the Telegram platform either that makes a decision. I think it’s like the a itself, like, Google and Apple impose it upon Telegram in order for them to have an a on the a store. So, like, what are you supposed to do? Appeal the ban to like, Apple and Google, it’s so convoluted.

 

So, yeah, there is no recourse. It’s the probably the main issue with the Telegram app, which is otherwise quite good, quite reliable. There have been instances where people have been banned outright from Telegram, but that’s, I think, almost always because they’re outright advocating calling for like a genocide or something quite explicit in a quite explicit way or something like this. And even still, you can usually get away with that kind of thing.

 

Or they, like the state, like specifically requests Telegram to take a particular channel down. I believe that probably is what happened to Tom’s first channel that was taken down. Um, it was probably literally like the Australian security services that requested it of Telegram.

 

But that is quite rare. So in this instance, that’s not what happened to me. I think what happened is probably just getting mass reported by the various political enemies that we have.

 

And eventually it’s succeeding.

 

Blair Cottrell: I have made something of a conscious effort to not get Apple banned by Telegram. And so far it seems to have worked. The effort I have made is just not to post that much.

 

And then when I do posts, I word things in such a way where it’s not so explicit or vulgar. You’ll notice that I go through periods where I’m like making a lot of content and then I calm down for a while and go through a rest period. This is for a couple of reasons. Like recently, I haven’t been posting much content because work’s picked up for me and I’ve needed to make some extra money because I was a bit behind in my personal life.

 

But I also don’t mind taking a break because it just kind of takes the heat off you. The all seeing eye of international jewry, you might say, kind of just overlooks you because you’re not really posting for a while. Then you can pop up again and make some videos for a couple of months. And you can take a break again for a couple of months. It seems to have worked so far, but I could be wrong. They could just target me next and I’d just be eating my words.

 

So I don’t know.

 

But the point is that I am concerned about being censored. Unfortunately, that’s just the game we’re in. And I try to balance my posting in such a way where I’m less likely to be censored, although I probably still will be eventually.

 

It’s a very frustrating game we have to play with these platforms, but it’s just the way it is.

 

The worst thing you can allow censorship to do is affect your own thoughts and perspective, though censorship can have that effect. If you’re so geared towards avoiding censorship, you can actually start changing your own thoughts and words. And, well, if you change your words enough to suit censorship standards, you’ll end up thinking differently.

 

And I think it can then have an impact on your psychology and even on your fundamental philosophy and perspective of the world. It’s very important not to let censorship do that.

 

But we obviously opened up this stream with a pretty cool video. Really good video, actually. I think it’s sick! Jacob’s peech. Jacob Hersant and some kind of flash activism. When did this occur? Joel? This particular rally? Was this recently?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. So we marched on Saturday, a bit after 03:00 pm. I was there. Like, the rule basically is, and this is actually isn’t what my preference is, but what the current decision is in the group, is that we should have uniformity. All of us should have balaclavas on, except for the one speaker who’s going to do the speech. In this instance was Jacob. In the past, it has been Tom.

 

And I think actually, in one rally, maybe a smaller one, I think maybe Tim Lutz actually was leading that one and went mask off for that rally.

 

But personally, and this is how some of the prior rallies went, they had basically anyone who doesn’t care about being doxxed, who’s already maybe a known figure, would have their face out. Everyone else would have to mask on. But the argument is that breaks down the kind of uniformity. The idea is to have this idea of anyone could be in the march, and to create this certain kind of Enigmatic vibe. I get the logic behind it.

 

So I had a mask on, as everyone else did other than Jacob. I was actually standing next to Jacob for the majority of the rally.

 

[11:25]

 

 

So basically what happened was that we formed up near the Immigration Museum, and for those who don’t know Melbourne, the Immigration Museum is just down the road down Flinders Street from Federation Square, which is a kind of prominent point in the kind of middle of the city, across the road from Flinders Street Station, which is, I think, the biggest train station in the city of Melbourne.

 

And so the objective was to basically form up at the Immigration Museum, snap a photo at the front of it, and then march down adjacent to the Yarra river, which runs through the centre of Melbourne down to the Federation Square, where we would kind of form up and do a speech and so on, make a little bit of a scene. There’s a lot of foot traffic around there, although it was quite a dreary day, actually. It was raining on and off. When we marched, the rain had died down, but it was periodically raining on and off, and it was quite cold, so there wasn’t as much foot traffic as you’d usually get.

 

But nevertheless, there were people about.

 

And so we formed up there in a couple places, and Jacob, you know, gave some speeches and we did some chants. Just made a bit of a scene, as we customarily do. Then we kind of Marched across the road, formed up in front of the train station. And as we formed up in front of the train station, I started to notice the police had started to react. And cop car after cop car was pulling up, and more and more police were forming up into a larger and larger blob.

 

And I said to Jacob:

 

“We probably want to get moving, [chuckling] because it looks like they’re about to kind of set upon us.”

 

But Jacob had other ideas and just kind of got on the front foot, [chuckling] kept yelling into the megaphone, and ultimately the police targeted him. So they must have been about eight or ten police, and they just kind of surrounded Jacob, grabbed onto him, said:

 

“Jacob Hersant, you’re under arrest!”

 

And just all grabbed him instantly.

 

So there wasn’t really much that could be done to prevent that without committing a crime and, like, violently resisting arrest.

 

So that was at the point at which we decided, let’s get the hell out of here. Because what’s the point of all of us getting arrested? We basically already finished the march at that point.

 

So we started moving off as a group, and we got out of there. The police grabbed on to some of us, including me, and just kind of like, just pulled my sleeve away, and they kind of gave up trying to grab us, and we all left, went home.

 

So that was the situation. But Jacob was arrested. They didn’t actually charge Jacob yet. They took him into the police station and processed him and threatened to charge him with this crime called “grossly offensive behaviour”, which is a crime in the state of Victoria. Most other states in Australia don’t have this as a crime. It’s actually quite a recent addition to the Crimes Act of Victoria, and in my opinion, is a totally ridiculous law. I mean, what is “grossly offensive behaviour”? This is such a vague and general notion.

 

I think, actually, we talked about up the stream before. I think Tom talked about the infamous so-called Dick Pusey incident. This guy, Richard Pusey was his name. I believe he had some interaction with a police officer. I think he got pulled over for speeding while high on cocaine or something like this, and the police officer got hit by an oncoming car. I believe. I could be misremembering this, so apologies if I get the details slightly wrong.

 

And I believe he kind of had a really callous reaction of filming him on his phone and laughing at him, rather than aiding the police officer, I think might have actually died. And this was considered such a horrible thing, but it wasn’t a crime to laugh at a dead police officer. So they brought in this so-called grossly offensive behaviour law, I believe, as a way to put something on the books so that when someone engages in particularly “callous and heinous behaviour”, they said at the time that they could go after them.

 

But in this instance, the pretext is a political march. Now, in Australia, we do have an implied right to a political free expression under the Constitution.

 

So if they do decide to try and charge Jacob with this crime, we’ll see them in court. And I would anticipate that we would have a good chance, actually, of success. And that would be fantastic, actually, if they would charge Jacob, because then we could attack this in court and basically try and maybe even countersue the police for denying us our political constitutional rights. But that would be a very long process.

 

And they still haven’t charged him yet. I guess they’re still weighing up whether they think it strategically makes sense, because what they have done, basically, if they don’t charge Jacob, is that they’ve invoked a law that probably is unconstitutional and shouldn’t really be applied in this context anyway, to a political rally. There’s no precedent for it.

 

But then if they don’t actually place the charge, they don’t actually have to defend this in court, but they can still use that as a pretext to make an arrest and break up the rally and basically prevent us from engaging in our, what is lawful political activity. So it just shows the lengths that the state is willing to go to mess with us, really, where we weren’t doing anything that required police intervention. We were literally marching around peacefully, giving speeches, making chants with a sign with a big banner that said, Mass Deportations Now!

 

At the RNC [Republican National Convention] in the United States, a week or two ago, there were a bunch of boomers holding up Mass Deportations Now signs in the crowd while Trump was speaking and stuff, and other people were speaking at the Republican National Convention. This is a mainstream political idea. Senator Malcolm Roberts of the One Nation party from Queensland, he called for mass deportations on Twitter a few months ago.

 

So we weren’t really engaging in rhetoric that was particularly extreme, even by our own standards! So this, to be considered grossly offensive, is basically crossing a line where now basically they want to say that it’s illegal to advocate for a political position, that, I wouldn’t say that maybe the majority of Australians would agree with, but a very substantial minority of Australians, if polled – haven’t seen any polling on mass deportations in particular – but I would anticipate there would be a significant portion of the public that would support such a thing. And regardless of the percentage of the public that would support such a thing, we’re supposed to have political rights and freedoms under, quote, unquote, “liberal democracy” in this country.

 

So it was a particularly egregious act of political policing. And we will look at probably what we can do legally about this.

 

[18:23]

 

 

But in addition, this law is also being used in a couple other applications. I think it’s being used to go after people who did the Roman salute. I think Nathan Bull is one of the members, Nathan Bull and Michael Nelson, who infamously threw Roman salutes in the city while wearing a provocative T-shirt which had like a Chud Jack on it and said:

 

“6 million. That’s a bit much, mate!”

 

We’ve covered this on the show before. This was one of, before the Roman salute was made illegal under these more recent laws that they’ve brought in to ban the Roman salute and the swastika and so on in public display.

 

But this was before those laws, so they’re saying:

 

“But it was grossly offensive behaviour.”

 

So that’s now before the courts. So those court cases are active. I anticipate there’s going to be a big legal battle against this idea, this notion of “grossly offensive behaviour” as a way to stifle political speech.

 

And I think it’s important that we maybe try and reach out to some of the libertarians. Some of the libertarians don’t agree with us on a lot, but supposedly they care about political freedom of expression. And so insofar as they do care about these things, it will be consistent for them to actually come and defend it in this instance.

 

So if anyone is out there listening, who’s in the libertarian sphere, or who has associates in the libertarian sphere, or who’s a lawyer who wants to help, who wants to give legal advice or whatever, get in contact, because this is really where the battleground for Australian free political expression is going on.

 

I mean, even from a non-nationalist perspective, if they can successfully implement this law to stifle our political speech, well, then what’s next? Then they’ll move on to the next controversial thing and the next controversial thing. They could use this under who knows what pretext. You know, you saw how tyrannical the state was during Covid against the Covid protesters.

 

The jews are now coming out and calling for the pro-Palestine protesters to face kind of legal repercussions. But who knows in coming years what pretexts and what political context they could try and extend this to, if they can successfully use it against us. So even if you don’t agree with our politics, you should come to our aid in this instance and come to our support.

 

But overall, I think the rally was a great success. Videos circulating from the rally accumulated almost a million views online over the past few days.

 

So that’s been very good to see a lot of public support. Even on the day, there was a lot of people that yelled out support at us, beebed their horns and put the thumbs up out the window of the car as we were walking down the street. There were some people that were filming us and they had kind of friendly expressions and so on.

 

Yeah, there were some Lefties that also had something to say as well, as you would expect in the middle of Melbourne. It’s a very Left-wing city.

 

But I would say the public reaction was pretty balanced.

 

A lot of people were just kind of interested, like:

 

“What is this?”

 

And what’s interesting as well that I find is that in these kinds of things, the non-Whites never have anything to say. Non-Whites just kind of like scurry past, whereas the, you either get White Leftists who yell out something negative or normal White people who give, like, a positive reaction.

 

So that’s kind of interesting.

 

But yeah, the idea with the rally was to do something that was kind of get in, march around, get out. We almost succeeded in doing that other than the Jacob Hersant arrest.

 

But maybe the Jacob Hersant arrest was in the grand scheme of things for the greater good, because maybe it’ll give us a chance to fight an unjust law here. And also it was all over the news.

 

So maybe that’s for the best to kind of get the message out that we’re out there and operative. So overall, I think we consider the rally to be a great success, and on to the next one.

 

But what do you think about all this, Blair?

 

Blair Cottrell: Well, I just wrote down a few points that I’ll make and a couple of questions for you as well.

 

But my take was that I was really impressed by the ferocity of Jacob’s speech. I’ve known Jacob since he was a kid. He was always smart, witty, loved to laugh, loved to joke. But I didn’t know he had that passion, that fire in his belly that I heard in his voice in the speech that he gave. And I was inspired! I was roused by it! It was a really good speech, and I’m really glad that he’s putting himself out there, like that. It was ballsy!

 

That’s what I said on my Telegram channel when I shared it’s ballsy stuff! Considering the current political climate and considering the fact that enemies to your country seem to have all the resources, to just throw yourself out there and speak your mind, stand up for what you believe and point out the truth! Because everything that Jacob said in that speech was the truth! It’s how things are.

 

But at this point, from what you’ve said, the information you’ve given about the day, it seems like Victoria police have just moved you on and haven’t formally charged you with anything criminal at this point. And Victoria police in Australia, they have the power to move protesters on if they believe it will prevent an incident. So they can just say:

 

“Oh, we believe there was going to be a violent incident, so we had to move them on to keep the peace.”

 

The thing is, though, they can’t really move you on if there’s enough of you that you can stand your ground and you don’t move on.

 

So if you can make these kind of flash protests more regular, to the extent where you’ve grown to two or 300 participants, at that point, the police couldn’t really move you on without excessive force and without making a real scene.

 

So I think maybe that could be the goal. You want to grow this kind of thing to the point where the police are forced to facilitate your rallies and you become a legitimate, regular protest, that happens in Melbourne. Because there’s heaps of regular protests that happen in Melbourne. And for that reason, in Melbourne, I, …

 

Joel Davis: I believe 21 protests a weekend!

 

[24:38]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: And many of them are much more aggressive than the protest you guys had.

 

So I think for that reason, there’s a lot for the police to think about if they’re going to charge you with some grossly offensive conduct, because if they’re going to charge you, they’re probably going to have to think about charging other protesters with something similar, and they’re going to be going up against all of Melbourne protest culture eventually. And there probably exists at least a few legal precedents where protesters have won against government intervention or overreaching, because there’s a lot of rights in Melbourne for public protest and political protest. It’s why everybody comes to Melbourne to host their protests.

 

There’s people in Melbourne from all over the world protesting about some country that I’ve never heard about. I walk through Melbourne and there’s these little, like, islander, Asian looking people holding some banner or flag that I’ve never even seen before, and they’re complaining about some dictator in their country in Melbourne. And I’m thinking, I don’t even know what’s going on here, know who these people are. That’s what Melbourne’s known for, right?

 

So, like I said, what I was getting at is it’s going to be a bit of a minefield for the department, Department of Public Prosecutions to successfully convict you guys of a criminal charge just for peacefully protesting. Because that was your intention, right? Your intention was to host a peaceful protest. Am I wrong?

 

Joel Davis: Yeah. If they were going to charge anyone, it would exclusively be Jacob, because the rest of us literally walked around without saying anything.

 

Blair Cottrell: They could claim that something Jacob said or did was specifically offensive. So they could then argue that you’re not being charged for protesting, Jacob himself is individually being charged for something that he did, but nothing that he did or said seemed overly inflammatory or illegal.

 

So I don’t know how they gotta go about doing that. Like I said, it’s gonna be a lot of work for the prosecution to actually put this into practice. But they may try. I don’t think they will. It’s going to be too hard for them, I think. But they may try because they may want to get a precedent, a foot in the door, something they can use against these other protesters, namely the pro-Palestinian protesters who the jewish lobby and jewish groups in Australia who are very upset with these protesters, and they probably want some sort of legal precedent to work with towards shutting these protesters down as well.

 

So for that reason, the prosecution might actually, police prosecution might try to put a case together. However, I think it’s going to be pretty easy to defend against it.

 

As I said, though, this kind of activism, if it’s made more regular, it will normalise it. And then you can potentially grow your attendance to the point where you’re protected by your own numbers. And that’s the immediate thing that comes to mind for me, I don’t really have much more to add other than that. I was really kind of shocked and impressed by it. Like I said, it was really ballsy. Jacob has the fire in his belly, and, yeah, it was cool to see someone just speaking their mind on the street. You got to admire that. It doesn’t even matter if you don’t like this kind of activism or politics. You got to admit, it takes balls to do that in this day and age, in our current political climate.

 

So it was cool to see.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think people will criticise. They say:

 

“Oh, well, normal people might be a little freaked out by the masks, and why do you say mass deportations? Why don’t you go for a more toned down message and so on?”

 

And it’s well, there’s ample opportunity for anyone who wants to do that, to do that kind of thing. The objective, the main objective of mobilising in the way that we did is to try and appeal to a specific niche, to appeal to people with a more aggressive, militant mindset, people who want the whole enchilada. People who want the style that we’re putting forward, because we want to recruit those kinds of people into our organisation to get bigger. But also we want to create a kind of forceful expression of willpower.

 

Because the largest problem that we face as White people is not that we don’t have the correct marketing strategy for how to dress up our politics or that we don’t have the right arguments or, … The problem is that most White people are fucking pussies! That’s the problem. That’s the fundamental problem!

 

And until White people stop being pussies and start getting angry and start getting focused and organised and start putting our willpower into practice in the world and start manifesting our will in an outward way, in an ostensible way, and taking the challenge to the system. Nothing is going to change. Because the all these other races and all of our enemies, they, at the moment, laugh at us! They can’t believe how easy they have it, that we are just allowing them to run over us like this.

 

[29:38]

 

And basically, all the immigrants pouring in, the anti-White agenda infecting all the major institutions, the way in which they sap White men of their dignity, the way that they strip White women of any kind of safety or civilised security that they can expect when they’re out in the public. They can’t believe that we’re letting them get away with it. They can’t believe that we’re sending our kids to school where they can be picked on by gangs of Arabs or blacks, and the teachers are going to propagandize them with all this nonsense about how evil their ancestors were. They come to our country, they have no gratitude. They then tell us that:

 

“Well, it isn’t your country anyway. You stole it from the Aboriginals! And White people, you’re all convicts and so on.”

 

You’ve heard all the talking points. There’s no respect! And you only get respect in this world when you demand it. No one’s going to give it to you. And the same thing is true when it comes to political power. The same thing is true when it comes to political support. No one is going to support a political movement and be willing to make sacrifices and put their life on the line. I don’t mean necessarily die, but just make sacrifices, put in money, put in time, potentially take damage, maybe get fired from a job, maybe lose certain opportunities lose certain friends.

 

People aren’t going to be willing to make those kinds of sacrifices if there isn’t a leadership, if there isn’t a kind of Spearhead of people who have balls! Who have determination, who make them believe these guys are going to be going at it till the end. These people are completely committed. Their hearts are pure. They care for the cause. You know, you have to instil that confidence in people to make them follow you.

 

And that is true on a smaller scale in terms of just building our current movement, but also on a larger scale upon trying to convince the public that there is a far-Right that can actually do something, that actually can mobilise enough numbers that it can actually protect them in some way from what is happening.

 

Until we become a horse that’s strong enough to take the fight to the enemy, who’s going to back us? You know, you’re backing a losing horse at the moment. So the only reason people are going to back us is because we light a fire of passion in them and they really resonate. And that’s basically what we were trying to do on the weekend. We’re trying to say:

 

“Look, there’s 40 of us out here.”

 

I mean, that’s just the Melbourne guys. There’s people all around the country. And not all the Melbourne guys showed up. But we got 40 guys in the street this weekend. Wouldn’t it be better if it was 400? Wouldn’t it be better if it was 4,000? Well join us! And then eventually it will be.

 

And then when it’s 4,000, people see 4,000 people in the street, then they start believing in something quite different. They start actually taking the message very seriously. And it seems as though it’s a message that has force, manpower behind it, and it will make people believe.

 

And so when the time comes where there’s something that needs to be responded to, like what we’ve seen. I want to talk about what’s happened in England with the horrible stabbing murder of those three young girls by that African. And he stabbed a bunch of other children, like, between the ages of six and ten. I think the rest of them, hopefully, are going to make it. I don’t actually know the full update on all of their conditions, but he killed three little girls, injured I don’t know how many more, eight or nine more or something. And the English are in the streets. They’re actually responding. They’re showing that there’s a reaction. They’re showing that they’ve had enough, and it’s making other people wake up and go:

 

“You know what? You’re right! This is enough. This has gone too far!”

 

And people are organising and people are radicalising and so on.

 

They’re radicalising not because of what happened in particular, because what happened in particular is that kind of thing has happened before many times in England, and it’s happened all over Europe. But there wasn’t the same reaction. And so it didn’t really move people enough.

 

But now that there’s a reaction, it actually inspires people to develop and cultivate a fighting spirit in themselves. And if enough White people start cultivating that fighting spirit, then all of a sudden we have a political movement that can actually do something.

 

So that’s the objective of that kind of activism, and our kind of approach, is we’re not going for mass appeal. We’re not trying to tone ourselves down and be maximally agreeable, because agreeable, toned down white people are getting nowhere! They’re getting run over! They’ve been getting run over for decades. What we need is White people that have had enough of the bullshit, and they’re not interested in putting on the suit and the tie and toning down our attitude to meet the sensibilities of middle class conservative types that don’t actually want to put anything on the line, that don’t want to risk anything. They just want to be able to vote for a party that solves the problem for them. That’s not how it’s going to work. How it’s going to work is thousands and thousands of men willing to go into the streets.

 

So that’s who we’re trying to appeal to. We’re trying to find that next 1,000 men that’ll come stand in the street with us.

 

And the only way that you can do that is by going and standing in the street and saying:

 

“Hey, come join us! Look, we’re ready!”

 

[35:09]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: I think increasing the frequency of the protests, as I said before, and also leaning heavily on that “right to peaceful protests” and obeying the law as much as you can, I think that’ll help you guys out a lot.

 

But you mentioned something earlier which I thought was interesting, even though you were standing there and Jacob was screaming “Australia for the Whiteman”, calling for mass deportations and so forth. Speaking of non-White races, you mentioned that non-White people passing by didn’t say anything. They didn’t really pay attention. They kind of just scurried away. And it got me, it got me thinking just now, is mass immigration and multiculturalism an exclusively White programme and policy?

 

And I think it is.

 

And while White governments kind of implement these policies and debate whether they’re good enough or whether they’re being moral or anti-racist enough, people who aren’t White, they just actually take advantage of those policies and then privately laugh about it.

 

So I think that’s why they don’t actually react when things like this happen, because they probably don’t feel that it’s their right to do so or that it’s in their interest to do so, or it’s just in their interest to take advantage of the policy and to kind of fly under the radar. I don’t know. What do you think?

 

Joel Davis: I mean, there’s plenty of approaches that people can take. Like, as I have said before, anyone that wants to do anything that is vaguely supportive of White interests and White nationalism, like, as long as you’re not like raping kids or doing something additionally that’s completely egregious that I can’t cosign, i’ll support you! Because anyone doing anything is better than nothing!

 

And I believe in honouring people that put in work, trying to advance our cause and the race. So there’s lots of different approaches that can make sense for different strategic reasons, but the idea is someone has to go full balls out and go:

 

“You know what? We’re going to take the fight to the enemy!”

 

Obviously as legal, like within the legal framework. No overstepping the legal Mark outside of these grossly offensive behaviour, bullshit laws that they’re trying to use. But not overstepping any actual laws.

 

And then the idea with that is we’ll march right up to the limit of what’s possible and what’s acceptable. And that’s going to appeal very much to a fraction of the population that are people that are potential radicals, people that are likely to actually devote their life to, like, White nationalist activism. And then we’re going to try and recruit that 1% or recruit that 3% into the movement.

 

And then you can have a movement of people who are really, really radical that then can then really, like, push the boundary of what’s acceptable and inspire the rest of the population, stretch the Overton Window and so on. That’s the idea.

 

And then there’s a whole bunch of other groups that can kind of fill in behind that and occupy different strategic positions behind that. The idea that us doing what we’re doing is going to make people less racist or something. Like:

 

“Oh, there’s guys in Balaclava’s marching around, therefore, I don’t like racism anymore or something.”

 

It doesn’t really make any sense. I don’t think that’s how anyone thinks. The public response whenever I’ve done these things has actually been more positive than negative, which I actually found surprising. I was expecting it to be more negative than positive.

 

So I think a lot of average working class White Aussies, they kind of appreciate the ballsy style of the way that we go about things.

 

Blair Cottrell: That’s not what the mainstream media said, though. The mainstream media report was, well, they made it their business to broadcast in their report that passerbys and the public did not support you.

 

But because they went out of their way to put that in their broadcast to make that part of their quick little story about you guys the opposite might be true. You can see that there’s a strong effort by the what would you call the institutional class, the media class, to reinforce into the minds of their viewers that:

 

“People do not support this!”

 

They kind of try to tell people what’s popular and what’s not popular, what they should support and what they shouldn’t support. And they were very quick to hone in on a couple of people who allegedly said something negative to you guys when you were protesting.

 

But my question for you earlier was, why do you think, or you remarked that non-White people didn’t react to your protests? Why do you think that is?

 

Joel Davis: I think non-Whites don’t react, number one, because they’re intimidated. And I think a lot of them like a lot of the non-Whites in Melbourne are like Asians, Indians. I mean, these people are not known for being particularly confrontational.

 

So I think it’s partly because of that.

 

But yeah, I think it’s also because I don’t think they feel the same kind of moral indignation because I think a lot of them realise that they’re outsiders and they’re just kind of making hay while the sun shines and almost can’t believe how accepting and permissive White people are because no other reason.

 

[41:10]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: It’s like they themselves understand better how foreign to Australia they are, than kind of like White liberals or White people in Australia who are educated from a young age to see outsiders and foreigners as Australians as well. Everyone’s Australian. But the people who actually come from other countries into this country, even people who are born of families of immigrants, they still feel and understand that they’re not from here. They’re not native to the Australian nation as it was established by the British colonials. And I do see this phenomenon all the time. They themselves, foreigners, understand how foreign they are.

 

Yet White people who grow up in Australia are taught not to see them as different. And they actually fully believe that these people are equal to them. We are raised from a young age to believe that. And a lot of people do still thoroughly believe that’s the conditioning of human equality program.

 

Joel Davis: Yeah, I think basically the White liberals that express their indignation as well, the thing is they have to morally differentiate themselves from their own Whiteness. They have to kind of come to terms with their own Whiteness as individual White people within our culture.

 

And so if they come to terms with their own Whiteness in the way that Leftists do, by pathologizing White Identity and kind of seeing Nazis as the most evil thing ever and so on, and develop this kind of out-group sensitivity, really a traitor mindset, frankly, then that’s going to become very important and integral to their identity.

 

Whereas if you’re just like some Asian immigrant, how you feel about Nazis actually isn’t really that important, because you don’t have to kind of contend with:

 

“Could I be a Nazi? Am I a racist?”

 

And have to go through some kind of cuckery within your own, like some kind of subconscious cuckery of your own, like racially charged thoughts or something:

 

“Oh, I had a racist thought. I’m so terrible. I must never allow myself to think that again or something!”

 

So it’s kind of like this thing with White people.

 

Blair Cottrell: I had an argument once in a taxi when I was younger. A couple of friends and I were getting a taxi home from a pub, and the Taxi Driver was Indian, and I was ranting to my friends because I had a couple of drinks. I don’t often drink, and I can handle my drinks. I don’t not drink because I can’t handle it. I just prefer not to drink. That’s why I don’t do it.

 

But when I do drink, I can get a little bit of that confidence kicks in. And I was trying to explain to my friends that people who weren’t White or descendant from the colonials, they weren’t actually Australians, and they themselves understood that they weren’t Australians, right? But my friends were arguing with me and saying:

 

“Nah, man. Like, as long as they obey our laws and live by our standards, and they’re Australians, too.”

 

But I used the taxi driver, the Indian character, driving the taxi, as an example, and I questioned him. I said:

 

 

 

“This guy himself.”

 

Let’s just say his name was Sadid or something. I said:

 

“Sadid, you’re not Australian, right? You’re from India, you’re not like me. We are different. You’re foreign to this country. Correct?”

 

And he says:

 

“Yes.”

 

I said:

 

“Right, so you’re Indian. You’re a different race to me. We’re not the same. Correct?”

 

He says:

 

“Correct.”

 

I said:

 

“So you would put your people first because that’s who you identify with. And I could be expected to do the same thing. Fair?”

 

And the Taxi Driver was like:

 

“Yeah.”

 

And I said to my friends:

 

“Well, there it is. Plain as day! Plain as the nose on your face, boys!”

 

And they still argued with me. They still said:

 

“Nah, nah, he’s just as Aussie as we are, man. He’s an Aussie as well.”

 

I said:

 

“He just said that he wasn’t!”

 

I said:

 

“He just openly told you that he’s foreign. He doesn’t consider himself Australian, and you’re still trying to argue that he’s Australian. He himself doesn’t even say that!”

 

I couldn’t believe that it’s like a core memory for me because it eally demonstrated the ignorance and the level of brainwashing of my own people in my own country. And it’s sometimes hard not to resent my own people, but I decide to regard them as victims of bad influence rather than being stupid or deliberately bad. And that gets me in the mood to spread some good influence and help people.

 

But, yeah, that’s, I thought that would be an interesting story to add to the equation.

 

Joel Davis: Well, on the leftist question, to me there’s two kinds of Leftists. There’s I think there’s what I would call “spiteful Leftists” or “bio Leftists”, where someone who is seriously biologically defective, whether it be mainly in their mental illness constitution, but generally it corresponds to physical weakness, physical ailments, sickness of the body of various kinds, being ugly, being small. If you feel like you, like, lesser than the average person, you feel like you basically got the short end of the genetic stick, then you’re going to be kind of quite resentful. You’re going to have this deep resentment towards White people who are actually healthy and noble. Resentful towards the standard racial hierarchy. And you’re going to be kind of turned off by any kind of ideology which celebrates hierarchy or celebrates certain virtues that are basically distributed to people better than you.

 

And so, you know how can you get revenge on all the chads and the Stacy’s? Obviously through this kind of egalitarian moral inversion.

 

And then you can then ally with out-groups against your own people as a way to then basically invert the status hierarchy. And you can dress it all up as you being a moral and superior person.

 

[47:30]

 

So I think for those people, I think those people, there’s no saving them. And they’re just basically like our biological enemies. They might as well be reclassified as of a different race because they’re such a defective part of our race that they’ve basically become differentiated into this totally distinct biological entity from us.

 

But then, and that’s, I think, a minority.

 

But then the majority of people with Leftist views are what I would call like “status seeking Leftists”.

 

And I think a lot of people are kind of conformist by nature. And just because the prevailing moral sensibilities of our time are Leftist, they basically think:

 

“Well, this is the values of all these institutions and determines the culture and the social status around me.”

 

And so they internalise those values and they don’t actually really think about it too deeply.

 

I think a lot of people, they just kind of internalise the values around them:

 

“Well, everyone else around me seems to believe this stuff, so it’s obviously true.”

 

And then anyone who challenges that, they then perceive as there’s something weird about this person. Why is this person thinking differently and violating all the moral norms that seem to be holding together the social space that I’m participating in and I have all these incentives to agree with so I just tell myself I agree with it internally because it’s just so much psychologically easier for me to just believe all of this stuff than to have to actually think about it because I don’t want to be cut off from society. This is all like subconscious thoughts that I’m describing.

 

So I think there’s a lot of people like that. Where if we had a society that was more Right-wing in its culture, they would all become more Right-wing as well, they would just conform to whatever the values of society were.

 

Whereas like what I called bio-Leftists or spiteful Leftists, I think they would still basically have Leftist proclivities even in a more Right-wing society.

 

So, yeah, I think the status seeking Leftists, I think we should have more compassion towards them. It’s not necessarily a bad thing that some people are conformist. If you have a society that has good leadership, it’s actually a good thing. It holds together society, makes it more stable. They are kind of the glue that holds together the social fabric and they just need better leadership. It’s not their fault that they have terrible leadership. They just don’t have much agency.

 

So whatever the leadership is, that’s what you’re going to get out of them. And it is what it is.

 

Blair Cottrell: Sounds like a supervillain, doesn’t it? Bio-Super-Saiyan Leftists. That’s what we’ve got to deal with these days, guys, bio-Leftists!

 

But did you want to segue into the story that you already mentioned, the story in England of little girls who I think were at a Taylor Swift themed dance party or something. They were set upon by a knife wielding African immigrant.

 

But I think he was a first generation or maybe second generation immigrants. I think he may have been born in England, but I’m not sure of all the details. What do you know, about that?

 

Joel Davis: So I believe the killer was a 17 year old of Rwandan descent and the media was like:

 

“Oh, he was born in Cardiff!”

 

Which is in Wales, and his family moved to, I think, Southport, I think is what it’s called, which is right near Liverpool in the northwest of England. Near the top of Wales on the Western coastline. Oh, when he was a six year old boy with his, with his family.

 

But you know, don’t neglect to mention that. And then like later it’s like:

 

“Oh, and his family were from Rwanda.”

 

Or something:

 

“But he’s British, you know! We’ve got these probably these Welsh baby killers out there we’ve got to watch out for!”

 

There was an image that I saw on Twitter of the guy, and he just looks like this, like, demonic. Like, he’s just black as fuck! And he had this, like, demonic expression on his face. They said he was 17. He looks like 35, horrifying, kind of dead look in his eyes!

 

So, yeah, anyway, so it was a Rwandan. I don’t think he would necessarily have probably have been a Muslim, because there was some speculation like, is this an Islamic, you know, terrorist attack? I mean, it’s possible. Most Rwandans, I don’t think, are Muslim. I think most of them are Christians or whatever weird variant of maybe they nominally Christian, but they have some, like, weird voodoo religion or something. But, it’s possible that he could have converted to Islam or that he’s from a minority of Islamic people that are Rwandans. I don’t know. But I think that’s beside the point.

 

I mean, the point is that he’s black! The point is that Rwandans shouldn’t fucking be in Britain! Or any Africans, for that matter! And that Africans are savage, and they’re way more predisposed to psychotic behaviour. And the media response was, rather than sympathizing with the victims, that we have these little girls stabbed to death for literally no reason.

 

Instead, the media focus is covering up the race of the murderer and then demonizing and attacking the protesters, who I think the reason why the riots initially broke out was they got together for a vigil. People of that community, they got together for a vigil for these girls that died.

 

And then a Islamic individual who wasn’t African, he looked like he was somewhere from the subcontinent in the images I saw, was arrested wearing a balaclava, holding a machete, by police. And when the people got wind of this, they reacted quite forcefully, saying:

 

“You know, so there was basically a Muslim coming to come and hack us for holding a vigil for dead children?”

 

And they lost it. Justifiably. And a bit of a riot ended up breaking out of sorts in the area, and protests and so on seem to be kind of erupting around the area now and maybe even in other parts of Britain from some of the things I’ve seen online.

 

So, which is good. It’s good to see a reaction, because when this thing happens, horrible things have happened where young people have been killed senselessly by hese racial aliens, these savages from Africa or the Middle East and there’s no reaction. They’ll have some big vigil in the middle of the city where they all sing Kumbaya and talk about how:

 

“We can’t blame this on race or something. We all have to come together!”

 

And that kind of bullshit! And that’s all that happens. It’s good to see a proper reaction. It’s good to see that the English people have a little bit of dignity left in them and righteous anger. Because righteous anger, bridging on what I said before, that’s the force that’s going to fucking save us! We’re not going to be saved by optics at the end of the day, we’re going to be saved by willpower!

 

So I think it’s actually quite good to see such a strong reaction, and long may it continue. I don’t think it’s over. I think there’s still a lot going on.

 

[55:00]

 

 

Blair Cottrell: That being said, I think the optics of your last demonstration were pretty good. Everyone being in black, everyone being pretty fit, everyone being in, I suppose, what you could say, an organised structure. Everyone knew where to stand, knew when to speak, knew what to do.

 

And I think it kind of looks cool that there’s only one guy with the mask off. At least it creates that perspective of uniformity.

 

So the aesthetics, which is what I regard optics as, the aesthetics were good. And it never hurts to have good aesthetics. You’ll notice people who protest on the left, whether they’re communists or Marxists, they always lack aesthetics because they’re not very healthy people. They look like shit!

 

And if you look like shit, it’s really hard to sell something to people because you’re like a physical example of what a philosophy is producing in a person, right?

 

So if your philosophy is good, you’re gonna look good. If you believe it well enough, and if you actually adhere to it. If your philosophy is bad, false, you’re gonna look like shit eventually, the longer you adhere to it. So a philosophy produces a physical expression relative to the quality of the philosophy itself.

 

And so I think for that reason, aesthetics will always be on our side, which is good.

 

Joel Davis: Aesthetics, I guess, like the word optics, it depends what you mean. Obviously you want to look good, you want to look cool.

 

But I guess what I meant to say is often optics is used as “don’t scare the hoes”. You know, don’t come across as too aggressive or too forceful. Tone it down. Make your message something that the majority of people would agree with. But the problem is that the majority of people are fucking pussies! And the majority of people have the wrong sensibilities.

 

So I don’t want to put a message forward that the majority of people would agree with, because that message isn’t good enough. I want to put forward a message that majority will don’t agree with, not yet. And they need to be challenged with. And, yeah, we’ve got to make it look cool.

 

So in that sense, you need good optics. You always got to look cool.

 

But it’s about showing strength. It’s about showing conviction.

 

And that’s what I love to see about what’s coming out of England at the moment is a lot of people disavowed the violence, so to speak. I’m not gonna do that. I could probably don’t want to say too much, but it’s good to see that these people just don’t give a fuck that they’re angry and that they’re expressing a true emotion. And we saw just in a week or two ago in, there was a massive riot in northern England. And I can’t remember which city it was. I think it was in Leeds. And some gypsy kid was, … Child Services came in to take a gypsy kid custody away from its parents. I don’t really know what the story was about, why they were trying to take custody off the gypsy parents. You know, maybe the gypsy parents were abusing the kid, I don’t know.

 

But then the gypsy community started rioting. And then a bunch of local Muslims just started joining in on the rioting as well, because why not? They just, like rioting. And the city descended into total anarchy. And the police basically had no control of the situation, and it lasted for days. And they had to just wait for them to stop rioting, and they got the kid back.

 

And so the message that that sent was like:

 

“Well, in England, like if you try to, like, peacefully and politically organise, you know, particularly as White people, you won’t get shit! But if you go and kick up a stink, then you can get something.”

 

So they basically said riot, and the police have shown weakness and a lack of capacity to restore order. Multiple instances in England. And the police have a reputation there for basically solving no crimes, being totally just weak and inept at protecting communities from violence, from all the rape and the gang violence and other forms of racially motivated hate crimes and so on.

 

But they’ll go knock on your door, if you make a racist tweet or something, Britain’s fucked! Particularly England, in the way that it’s policed. So no one should have any respect for the police in Britain because they don’t actually do their job. They don’t actually protect the people. They uphold an anti-White anarcho-tyranny.

 

And so White people ultimately are going to have to start organising to take care of their own fucking communities because the state is no longer actually functioning in a way that protects them. That’s what happens when you don’t protect people, when you invite in all these violent people where you give them soft sentences.

 

There’s been child rapists in Britain that have been sentenced to paltry sentences and, like, let out early and stuff because of their:

 

“Oh, they’re struggling with cultural assimilation or and where they come from, they don’t have laws against rape. How are they supposed to know they weren’t supposed to rape ten year olds or something!”

 

I mean, it’s insane the kinds of things that happens.

 

Meanwhile, they put Sam Melia in jail for two years for distributing stickers. They put other nationalist activists in jail for even longer sentences than that for handing out literature or giving speeches that were too edgy or something. Britain is unbelievably fucked! It’s way worse than Australia with this kind of thing. It’s quite bad here, as we were talking about earlier.

 

So this idea that the English people are supposed to just get your local representative elected and just peacefully organise, even though they tried to do that, they tried to build the nationalist party, the BNP. The intelligence services of Britain actively sabotaged and destroyed it. They had the National Action guys, various other nationalist groups that were prescribed, listed as terrorists, mass jailed. So many nationalist activists have had to flee the country or if they have, to avoid being locked up. The nationalist movement in Britain has been utterly attacked for decades by the State.

 

[1:01:05]

 

Anyone who tries to organise to defend, basically the idea that English girls shouldn’t be mass raped by Pakistanis or that they should have some modicum of justice for White victims of senseless and egregious acts of violence, in some cases murder, get called racist and marginalised from society and fired from their jobs. And so on. The list goes on.

 

So what the fuck are they supposed to do? All their other options have been exhausted.

 

So there’s absolutely no moral reason whatsoever that you can conjure up that’s good to justify not supporting almost anything that they do at this point, because their anger is totally justified. Their country is being fucking stolen from them, and they’re basically being forced to be subjected to third world conditions.

 

And basically the entire government is designed around preventing them from organising to protect themselves while completely unleashing an anarchy, a brutal anarchy of these foreign invaders engaging in all kinds of egregious behaviour against them! Like, it’s fucking insane! So godspeed to them.

 

I hope that the protests get bigger and get more aggressive and more and more people get in the streets, and I hope it swells up into a fucking mess that the government doesn’t know how to deal with over there. I really do, because that’s what’s necessary probably, to, like, force the issue and to force a polarisation.

 

And I’ve seen a lot of more conservative types on social media from Britain saying:

 

“You know what? I don’t give a fuck anymore! I’m a racist! There, I said it!”

 

And this kind of rhetoric, you know, it does seem like it’s a very polarizing time in Britain at the moment with recent events and good! About fucking time!